Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council 12/05/2005
AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL *REVISED* REGULAR MEETING December 5, 2005 Monday, 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Annexation and R-8 zoning of 10.6 acres located east of 138th Ave. SE and north of SE 132nd St. (Lindberg) b. Extension of moratorium on sewer availabilities for new subdivisions in the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area for an additional six months 4. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 5. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 6. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/21/2005. Council concur. b. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/28/2005. Council concur. c. Community Services Department requests authorization to reallocate $95,220 from the Major Maintenance Public Buildings Fund 316 to support the replacement of the Tiffany Park Recreation Building. Refer to Finance Committee. d. Community Services Department recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $84,190 with JGM Landscape Architects to develop a tri-park master plan for the integrated use of Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the NARCO property. Council concur. e. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of an agreement with the King Conservation District Number 9 to accept the City's share of the King Conservation District's 2002-2005 assessments in the amount of $59,953.85, and approval to use $4,869 for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. Council concur. (See 8.b. for resolution.) 7. CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Patrick J. Gilroy, LandTrust, Inc., 1560 140th Ave. NE, Suite 100, Bellevue, 98005, stating that in order to service the Wedgewood Lane Divisions 1, 2 and 3 preliminary plats with sanitary sewer, City staff requested two improvements to facilitate future development of surrounding properties. Mr. Gilroy asked that the City share the cost of the infrastructure improvements. Refer to Utilities Committee. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. a. Committee of the Whole: 2006 Budget Ordinances* (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) b. Committee on Committees: 2006 Council Committee Assignments c. Planning & Development Committee: Reclassification of Stream in Vicinity of Jones Ave. NE & NE 20th St. 9. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Establishing facts, extending a moratorium on sewer availability for new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area, and establishing a termination date (see 3.b.) b. King Conservation District Number 9 grant agreement (see 6.e.) Ordinances for first reading: a. Approving the Lindberg Annexation (see 3.a.) b. Establishing R-8 zoning for the Lindberg Annexation (see 3.a.) c. Fire prevention fees (see 8.a.) d. Golf course greens fees (see 8.a.) e. Various utility fees (see 8.a.) f. 2006 annual City of Renton Budget (see 8.a.) g. 2005 amendments to the Comprehensive Plan (Council approved 11/21/2005) h. Griffin Home & vicinity property rezone from R-1 to R-4 (Council approved 11/21/2005) i. Southport Development property rezone from COR to UC-N2 (Council approved 11/21/2005) j. Jones Ave. properties rezone from R-8 to RC (Council approved 11/21/2005) k. Monterey Court properties rezone from R-4 to R-1 (Council approved 11/21/2005) 1. NE 28th St. & Edmonds Ave. properties rezone from R-8 to R-I (Council approved 11/21/2005) m. Maplewood Glen & vicinity property rezone from R-8 to R-4 (Council approved 11/21/2005) n. Panther Creek Wetland property rezone from R-8 to R-1 (Council approved 11/21/2005) o. Maplewood Addition property rezone from R-8 to R-4 (Council approved 11/21/2005) p. Revising land uses in RC and R-1 zones (Council approved 11/21/2005) q. Changing provisions for residential uses within CA zone (Council approved 11/7/2005) Ordinance for first reading and advancement to second and final reading: Amending and reestablishing the property tax levy for 2006 (see 8.a.) Ordinances for second and final reading: a. System Development Charges and Annexation Fee (1st reading 11/28/2005) b. Allowing application for a fee in lieu of street improvements (1st reading 11/28/2005) c. Approving the Mosier II Annexation (1st reading 11/28/2005) d. Establishing R-4 zoning for 34.7 acres of the Mosier II Annexation (1st reading 11/28/2005) e. Establishing R-8 zoning for 20.5 acres of the Mosier II Annexation (1st reading 11/28/2005) 10. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 11. AUDIENCE COMMENT 12. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) CANCELLED • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNC11L Regular Meeting December 5, 2005 Council Chambers Monday, 7:00 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE, Council President; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City ATTENDANCE Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; JENNIFER HENNING, Principal Planner; MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator; MICHAEL BAILEY, Finance and Information Services Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; REBECCA LIND, Planner Manager; COMMANDER KATIE MCCLINCY, Police Department. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Lindberg, 138th accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Ave SE & SE 132nd St public hearing to consider the proposed annexation and R-8 zoning of 10.6 acres located east of 138th Ave. SE (Duvall Ave. NE) and north of SE 132nd St. (NE 2nd St.); Lindberg. Don Erickson, Senior Planner, stated that the annexation site contains nine single-family dwellings, and is relatively flat with a two percent slope from west to east. Potential wetlands affect two northern parcels. He noted that the site is served by Fire District #25 and the Renton School District, and is within the Renton water, Water District #90, and Renton sewer service areas. Mr. Erickson reported that current King County zoning is R-4 (four dwelling units per gross acre), and the City's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Single Family, for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning is proposed. The fiscal impact analysis estimates a deficit of $575 at current development, and a surplus of $8,580 at full development, assuming a potential of 63 new single-family homes and a new assessed home value of $350,000. He noted the estimated one-time parks development cost of $35,383. Mr. Erickson concluded that the annexation proposal serves the best interests and general welfare of the City, and is consistent with City policies. Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE 10.6-ACRE LINDBERG ANNEXATION AND ADOPT THE CONCURRENT R-8 ZONING, WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION. CARRIED. Utility: Sewer Moratorium in This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in East Renton Plateau PAA accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the public hearing to consider extending the moratorium on sewer availabilities for December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 431 new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area (PAA) for an additional six months. The current moratorium expires on December 6th. Rebecca Lind, Planner Manager, stated that the moratorium was enacted in response to a citizens group, Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (CARE). The purpose of the moratorium was to allow consideration of a proposed annexation petition for the East Renton Plateau prior to vesting developable properties under King County development standards. She reported that CARE submitted an annexation petition on November 15th that designates an annexation boundary, and calls for an election. The petition has been submitted to King County for certification. Ms. Lind explained that the boundary designated by the annexation petition does not include the entire PAA. However, staff recommends that the moratorium continue to cover the entire East Renton Plateau PAA because some property owners outside the petition boundary may want to be added, and because the Boundary Review Board has the authority to modify the annexation boundary by five percent of its proposed acreage, and there is no indication of which areas may be either included or excluded. Continuing, Ms. Lind reviewed the differences between the Renton and King County development standards for the area, such as Renton only allowing single-family development. She reported that within 60 days of the certification of the annexation petition by King County, Council must either approve or reject the petition. If approved, an election date request will be made to King County. Ms. Lind pointed out that the earliest possible election date is in April or May. In conclusion, Ms. Lind stated that extending the moratorium for six more months allows for the following: Council to consider the annexation petition without extending the sewer availabilities, a date to be set for the election, and the registered voters in the area to determine the election outcome before resuming sewer availabilities. Public comment was invited. Tom Carpenter, 15006 SE 139th Pl., Renton, 98059, stated that he is an elected member of the Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council that represents three voting districts inside the East Renton Plateau PAA. He expressed his support for extending the moratorium; however, he pointed out that annexation is not going to handle the area's decreasing quality of life issues in a timely manner. Mr. Carpenter stressed that an interlocal agreement between Renton and King County is needed that addresses the movement of funds to support planning efforts for the area, and establishes design standards. He indicated that King County Councilmember Reagan Dunn is prepared to support such an agreement. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reported that Renton is already in discussion with King County regarding this issue. Gwendolyn High, President of CARE, 13405 158th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, urged Council to extend the sewer moratorium. She explained that CARE sees the moratorium as one of many critical steps being undertaken in the community through the larger annexation discussion and process. Ms. High indicated that the moratorium builds on the positive momentum already December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 432 growing in the community, and it provides opportunity for the preservation of the community's character and quality of life. Garrett Huffman, South King County Manager of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties, 335 116th Ave. SE, Bellevue, 98004, stated that extending the moratorium has consequences in that he is aware of one particular developer who wants to develop a property, and does not know whether Renton or King County development standards will apply. Mr. Huffman asked the City to expedite the process. Fred Herber, Bennett Development, 12011 NE 1st St., Suite 201, Bellevue, 98005, indicated that he is the developer referred to by the previous speaker, and stated his preference for developing to Renton's standards. Mr. Herber expressed concern regarding the amount of time needed for the annexation process, which delays his project. In response to Councilman Clawson's inquiries, Mr. Herber stated that sewer hook-up should be available for his project by next summer, and he confirmed that the project delay is also a result of not knowing on which development standards to base the design. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. (See page 437 for resolution.) ADMINISTRATIVE Economic Development Administrator Alex Pietsch reviewed a written REPORT administrative report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: Join in the holiday spirit and share in the Angel Tree Program, which helps children and families who are less fortunate. Trees with tags representing requests from families screened by the Renton Salvation Army are available this year at City locations, including the Community Center, City Hall, and Carco Theatre. The annual Candy Cane Canine Fun Run and Walk will be held on December 1 Ith at the Community Center. AUDIENCE COMMENT Barbara Hicks, 1835 NE 20th St., Renton, 98056, spoke on the topic of the Citizen Comment: Hicks - proposed stream reclassification, located in the vicinity of Jones Ave. NE and Stream Reclassification, Jones NE 20th St., that was referred to Planning and Development Committee on Ave NE & NE 20th St 11/28/2005. She stated that reclassifying the stream to Class 5, which is an artificial stream where no natural channel existed before, is inconsistent with her personal knowledge of that stream. Ms. Hicks noted the lack of notification regarding this matter and another matter related to the NE 20th St. area. She requested that action not be taken on the stream reclassification without further study. Citizen Comment: Cook - F. Jay Cook, 14012 SE 133rd St., Renton, 98059, stated that he lives in the Mosier II Annexation, 140th Puget Colony Homes area, for which Renton's R-8 zoning is proposed as part of Ave SE & SE 136th St the Mosier II Annexation. He indicated that he submitted an application to change the zoning from R-8 to R4, and requested a waiver of the associated fee. However, Mr. Cook pointed out that the subject ordinance establishing R- 8 zoning is scheduled for second reading this evening. December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 433 Economic Development Administrator Alex Pietsch explained that the Puget Colony Homes development is part of the expanded Mosier H Annexation area, and Mr. Cook has submitted an application for a 2006 Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the area's land use designation to Residential Low Density which allows R4 zoning. Noting that the Comprehensive Plan designates the subject area as Residential Single Family, which only allows R-8 zoning, Mr. Pietch stated that by law, the area can only be annexed to Renton if it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use designation. Mr. Pietch pointed out that Council does have the ability to waive the $3,000 application fee. Mr. Cook said that it is more difficult to first establish R-8 zoning for the area, and then change the zoning to R-4. Councilman Persson noted that the roadways are not designed to handle R-8 zoning. Stating that he does not want to delay the annexation, Mr. Persson suggested further discussion about R-4 zoning at a later time. Mr. Pietsch explained that if the annexation is adopted this evening, the next step is for either Mr. Cook to pay the fee or the City waive the fee for a possible Comprehensive Plan Amendment to downgrade the zoning. He noted the presence of restrictive covenants for most of the homes in the development that limit the ability of the homeowners to subdivide. Discussion ensued regarding the restrictive covenants, Council's ability to waive the Comprehensive Plan Amendment fee, and the setting of a precedent by waiving the fee. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler asked that staff compile more information regarding this matter in time for next week's meeting. Citizen Comment: Finnicum - Karen Finnicum, 1302 Aberdeen Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, also commented on Stream Reclassification, Jones the proposed stream reclassification, stating that she grew up at a house located Ave NE & NE 20th St at 2001 NE 20th St. She pointed out that the house backed up to wetlands that helped feed the blueberry farm and Kennydale Creek, and she described how the area has changed over the years. Ms. Finnicum emphasized that the stream runs year-round and is natural, and she asked for further review of the matter. Councilman Clawson reported that the Planning and Development Committee met on this issue on December 1st, and he indicated that this is not the type of action that requires notification. He stated that he plans on leaving the item in committee for further review, and inquired about the urgency of the matter. Jennifer Henning, Principal Planner, stated that the developer is eager for an answer; however, she acknowledged the interest of the community members. She explained that the City recently adopted critical areas regulations that classify streams as Class 1 through Class 5, and the inventoried streams are shown on a Water Class Map. Ms. Henning noted that each stream class has a different buffer requirement. Ms. Henning reported that the subject stream is located on three properties, and a pre -application meeting was held to discuss possible subdivision of the properties. The properties contain a water feature that is considered to be part of Kennydale Creek, and Kennydale Creek is mapped as a Class 4 stream in this area. She indicated that the developer has requested a reclassification of the stream from Class 4 to Class 5 through these properties, and has submitted evidence showing that the stream qualifies for Class 5 designation. December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 434 In response to Councilman Corman's inquiry, Ms. Henning confirmed that a Class 5 stream has no setback requirements. Citizen Comment: Rider - Susan Rider, 1835 NE 20th St., Renton, 98056, emphasized that the Kennydale Stream Reclassification, Jones wetland system is dying, and the stream reclassification is yet one more blow to Ave NE & NE 20th St the system. She stated that no one profits from this action but the developer. Pointing out that the regulations are supposed to protect the environment, Ms. Rider stressed that the creek does not meet the definition of a Class 5. She requested further study, and notification of upcoming related meetings. Citizen Comment: Nelson - James Nelson, 1905 NE 20th St., Renton, 98056, stated that he grew up in the Stream Reclassification, Jones area of the subject stream reclassification, and noted that he has never seen the Ave NE & NE 20th St creek run dry. He expressed his concern that future development will destroy the entire natural area. Citizen Comment: Gordley - Lauralee Gordley, 2010 Jones Ave. NE, Renton, 98056, stated that she is the Stream Reclassification, Jones property owner of the stream reclassification area. Ms. Gordley pointed out Ave NE & NE 20th St that a lot of work has been done for the reclassification, and all of the critical area regulation requirements have been fulfilled. She reviewed the reports that were prepared, and noted that aerial photographs show the creek was not present before the ditch was dug. Ms. Gordley acknowledged people's concerns, but stressed that the area has changed in many ways and cannot return to the way it was. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that the concerned parties will be notified of the next committee meeting. Councilman Clawson reiterated that this issue merits further review. CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/21/2005. Council concur. 11/21/2005 Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 11/28/2005. Council concur. 11/28/2005 Community Services: Tiffany Community Services Department requested authorization to reallocate $95,220 Park Recreation Building, from Fund 316, Major Maintenance Public Buildings, to support the Fund 316 Reallocation replacement of the Tiffany Park Recreation Building. Refer to Finance Committee. Community Services: Tri-Park Community Services Department recommended approval of a contract in the Master Plan, JGM Landscape amount of $84,190 with JGM Landscape Architects to develop a tri-park master Architects plan for the integrated use of Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the Narco property. Council concur. Utility: King Conservation Utility Systems Division recommended approval of an agreement with King District Grant Conservation District Number 9 to accept the City's share of the King Conservation District's 2002-2005 assessments in the amount of $59,953.85, and approval to use $4,869 for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. Council concur. (See page 437 for resolution.) MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 435 CORRESPONDENCE A letter was read from Patrick J. Gilroy, LandTrust, Inc., 1560 140th Ave. NE, Citizen Comment: Gilroy - Suite 100, Bellevue, 98005, stating that in order to service the Wedgewood Wedgewood Lane Preliminary Lane Divisions 1, 2 and 3 preliminary plats with sanitary sewer, City staff Plats Utility Improvements, requested two improvements to facilitate the future development of surrounding Cost Share Request properties. Mr. Gilroy asked that the City share the cost of the infrastructure improvements. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THIS CORRESPONDENCE TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Council President Briere presented a Committee of the Whole report regarding Committee of the Whole adoption of the 2006 budget ordinances. Budget: 2006 Annual City of property Tax Levy. The preliminary information provided by King County, Renton and used to develop the revenue estimates, provided a total general government property tax estimate of $21,755,827. This was based on a new construction estimate of $167,912,009. In developing the 2006 budget estimate, the property tax estimate used contained the long-term financial forecast of $22,026,700. This was based on an estimate of $250,000,000 in new construction. It was believed that the estimate was a bit high, but left some room for fine-tuning of King County's estimates. A revised preliminary property tax worksheet was recently provided by King County. It revised the estimate for total general government property taxes to $22,209,409 based on $311,622,057 in new construction. The difference will not be collected without a revision to the ordinance. Original Budget Final King County Estimate King County Tax Amount 219755,827 22,026,700 22,209,409 New Construction AV 167,912,009 250,000,000 311,622,057 The recommendation was to add $182,709 to General Fund reserves and amend the 2006 Budget to invest in needs as identified in the priorities of government effort and at the Council retreat. These funds cannot be spent without additional Council action. Fire Prevention Fees. The Committee recommended that certain fire plan review and inspection fees be increased. Golf Course Greens Fees. The Committee recommended that certain golf course greens fees be increased. Various Utilities Fees. To meet the capital and operating expenses of utilities, as recommended by the Planning/Building/Public Works Administration, the Committee recommended that certain utility fees be increased for surface water, surface water utility services, special rates for senior and/or disabled citizens and double occupancy households, the fire protection charge, minimum rates for metered water, commodity rates, commercial customers, low-income rates, disposal rates for sewage, and King County wastewater sewer rates. 2006 Budget. The Committee recommended adoption of the 2006 Budget, including the following changes: • Increase the revenue estimate in the General Fund for property taxes by $50,000. December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 436 • Increase the revenue estimate in the General Fund for intergovernmental revenues by $200,000. • Increase the Police Department budget in the General Fund by $200,000 to provide for two additional police officers • Increase the Council budget, professional services account, by $15,000. • Increase the reserve account in the General Fund by $35,000. • Reduce the appropriation in Fund 316 by $4.2 million for a Parks Maintenance Facility, and increase the Parks Maintenance Facility reserve fund balance correspondingly. • Reduce the appropriation in Fund 316 by $68,000 for a park in the Heather Downs neighborhood, and increase the undesignated fund balance correspondingly. The Committee recommended a total, balanced 2006 Budget of $172,019,527. The Committee further recommended that the ordinances regarding these matters be presented for first reading.* Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes pointed out that a revision in the property tax estimate affects the 2006 property tax levy ordinance adopted last week; therefore, an ordinance amending and reestablishing the property tax levy has been prepared for first and second reading tonight. *MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 437 for ordinances.) Committee on Committees Council President-elect Corman presented a Committee on Committees report Council: 2006 Committee recommending the following Council committee chairmanships and committee Assignments assignments for 2006: Community Services Committee: Toni Nelson, Chair; Marcie Palmer, Vice Chair; Dan Clawson, Member. Finance Committee: Don Persson, Chair; Denis Law, Vice Chair; Toni Nelson, Member. Planning and Development Committee: Terri Briere, Chair; Dan Clawson, Vice Chair; Marcie Palmer, Member. Public Safety Committee: Denis Law, Chair; Toni Nelson, Vice Chair; Don Persson, Member. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Marcie Palmer, Chair; Don Persson, Vice Chair; Terri Briere, Member. Utilities Committee: Dan Clawson, Chair; Terri Briere, Vice Chair; Denis Law, Member. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 437 Resolution #3783 A resolution was read establishing facts, extending a moratorium on sewer Utility: Sewer Moratorium in availability for new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau Potential East Renton Plateau PAA Annexation Area, and establishing a termination date for the moratorium of 6/5/2006. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3784 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Utility: King Conservation interlocal cooperative agreement with King Conservation District Number 9 for District Grant award of a non-competitive grant. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 12/12/2005 for second and final reading: Annexation: Lindberg, 138th An ordinance was read annexing approximately 10.6 acres generally located Ave SE & SE 132nd St north of the centerline of SE 132nd St. and east of the eastern edge of the 138th Ave. SE right-of-way (Lindberg Annexation). MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Annexation: Lindberg, R-8 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of approximately Zoning 9.72 acres located east of 138th Ave. SE and north of SE 132nd St. annexed within the City of Renton from R-4 (Urban Residential - four dwelling units per acre; King County zoning) to R-8 (Residential - eight dwelling units per acre) zoning; Lindberg Annexation. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Budget: Fire Prevention Fees An ordinance was read amending Section 4-1-150, Fire Prevention Fees, of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code by amending the fire prevention fees. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Budget: Golf Course Greens An ordinance was read amending Chapter 1, Fee Schedule, of Title V, Finance Fees and Business Regulations, of City Code by increasing certain golf course greens fees. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Budget: Utilities Fees An ordinance was read amending Sections 8-2-2.G and 8-2-3.E. I of Chapter 2, Storm and Surface Water Drainage; Sections 8-4-24 and 8-4-31 of Chapter 4, Water; and Section 8-5-15 of Chapter 5, Sewers of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of City Code by increasing fees. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Budget: 2006 Annual City of An ordinance was read adopting the annual City of Renton 2006 Budget in the Renton total balanced amount of $172,019,527. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Comprehensive Plan: 2005 An ordinance was read adopting the 2005 amendments to the City's 2004 Amendments Comprehensive Plan, maps, and data in conjunction therewith. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005.* December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 438 Councilman Law stated that while he supports the primary changes to the Comprehensive Plan, he objects to the portion that includes bringing the West Hill into Renton's Potential Annexation Area. He stated that the timing is wrong, and the City should wait until the Legislature or some other entity comes up with money to help fund that issue. *MOTION CARRIED. Rezone: Griffin Home & An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Griffin Home Vicinity, N 26th St, R-1 to R-4 and vicinity properties consisting of approximately 6.8 acres located along Lake Washington Blvd. N. and N. 26th St. from R-1 (Residential - one dwelling unit per acre) to R-4 (Residential - four dwelling units per acre) zoning; LUA-05- 006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area B. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Rezone: Southport An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Southport Development, COR to UC-N2 development property consisting of approximately 17 acres located south of Lake Washington from COR (Commercial Office Residential) to UC-N2 (Urban Center - North 2) zoning; LUA-05-006, CPA 2005-M-07, Southport. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Rezone: Jones Ave Properties, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Jones Ave. Jones Ave NE, R-8 to RC properties consisting of approximately 5.4 acres located along Jones Ave. NE from R-8 (Residential - eight dwelling units per acre) to RC (Resource Conservation) zoning; LUA-05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area El. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Rezone: Monterey Court An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Monterey Properties, NE 31st St, R-4 to Court properties located in a native growth protection easement as part of the R-1 Brookridge Plat from R-4 (Residential - four dwelling units per acre) to R-1 (Residential - one dwelling unit per acre) zoning; LUA-05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area E2. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Rezone: NE 28th St & An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the NE 28th St. Edmonds Ave Properties, R-8 and Edmonds Ave. properties from R-8 (Residential - eight dwelling units per to R-1 acre) to R-1 (Residential - one dwelling unit per acre) zoning; LUA-05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area E3. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Rezone: Maplewood Glen & An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Maplewood Vicinity, SE 5th St, R-8 to R-4 Glen and vicinity properties from R-8 (Residential - eight dwelling units per acre) to R-4 (Residential - four dwelling units per acre) zoning; LUA-05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area L2. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 439 Rezone: Panther Creek An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Panther Creek Wetland, SR-167, R-8 to R-1 Wetland properties from R-8 (Residential - eight dwelling units per acre) to R-1 (Residential - one dwelling unit per acre) zoning; LUA-05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area P. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Rezone: Maplewood Addition, An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of the Maplewood SE 1 lth St, R-8 to R-4 Addition properties from R-8 (Residential - eight dwelling units per acre) to R- 4 (Residential - four dwelling units per acre) zoning; LUA-05-006, CPA 2005- M-1, Area K3. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Comprehensive Plan: 2005 An ordinance was read amending Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Amendments, R-1 and RC Standards of Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code by revising land Zones uses in the RC (Resource Conservation) and R-1 (Residential - one dwelling unit per acre) zones. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. Planning: Residential Uses in An ordinance was read amending Chapter 4-2, Zoning Districts - Uses and the Commercial Arterial Zone Standards, Chapter 4-3, Environmental Regulations and Special Districts, and Chapter 44, Citywide Property Development Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code by changing the provisions for residential uses within the CA (Commercial Arterial) zone. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 12/12/2005. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for first reading and advanced for second and final reading: Budget: 2006 Property Tax An ordinance was read amending and reestablishing the property tax levy for Levy the year 2006 for both general purposes and for voter approved bond issues. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED. Ordinance #5168 Following second and final reading of the above ordinance, it was MOVED BY Budget: 2006 Property Tax LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS Levy READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance #5169 An ordinance was read amending Sections 4-1-170 and 4-1-180 of Chapter 1, Utility: System Development Public Works Fees, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code by Charges, Annexation Fee changing the fee schedules. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #5170 An ordinance was read amending Section 4-9-060 of Chapter 9, Permits - Development Services: Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of City Code by allowing Deferral of Street application for a fee in lieu of street improvements. MOVED BY CLAWSON, Improvements SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. December 5, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 440 Ordinance #5171 An ordinance was read annexing approximately 65 acres of property located Annexation: Mosier II, 140th between 140th Ave. SE and Lyons Ave. NE, north of SE 136th St. (Mosier II Ave SE & SE 136th St Annexation). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #5172 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately Annexation: Mosier II, R4 34.7 acres annexed within the City of Renton from R4 (Urban Residential - Zoning four dwelling units per acre; King County zoning) to R4 (four dwelling units per acre) zoning; Mosier II Annexation. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #5173 An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification for approximately Annexation: Mosier II, R-8 20.5 acres annexed within the City of Renton from R-4 (Urban Residential - Zoning four dwelling units per acre; King County zoning) to R-8 (eight dwelling units per acre) zoning; Mosier II Annexation. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Pointing out that the budget process was the most collaborative he has Budget: 2006 Annual City of experienced, Councilman Clawson stated that he is proud of what was Renton accomplished in the somewhat challenging economic environment. AUDIENCE COMMENT Responding to the inquiries of F. Jay Cook, 14012 SE 133rd St., Renton, Citizen Comment: Cook - 98059, City Clerk Bonnie Walton reviewed the process and timeline for the Mosier II Annexation, 140th notification of parties affected by the Mosier II Annexation, and Mayor Ave SE & SE 136th St Keolker-Wheeler explained that ordinances legalize actions taken by the Council. Ms. Walton stated that ordinance summaries are published in the King County Journal, and the ordinances are posted at the Renton libraries. Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes pointed out that the Mosier II ordinances are effective 30 days after publication (1/8/2006). EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL RECESS AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTES TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:42 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:11 p.m. v. Ll/Qzo?�O-� Bonnie 1. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann December 5, 2005 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 5, 2005 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (Briere) COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Persson) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Clawson) PUBLIC SAFETY (Law) TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) (Palmer) UTILITIES (Corman) MON., 12/12 MON., 12/12 CANCELLED CANCELLED MON., 12/12 Vouchers; 5:30 p.m. 2005 Year -End Budget Amendment Ordinance; Sister City Program Fund Allocation; Library Software Migration Contract with Dynix, Inc. THURS., 12/08 Honey Brooke West Preliminary Plat 2:00 p.m. Appeal *Council Chambers* NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. Y ♦(111� ),�+ LINDBERG ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING ANNEXATION RESOLUTION & FUTURE ZONING December 5, 2005 The Council accepted the 60% Direct Petition to annex for this annexation on May 23, 2005. At that time it also authorized the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for their mandatory 45-day review period. Under state law, two public hearings, at least 30-days apart, are required before the zoning on land annexed into a city can be changed. The Council considered future zoning for the 10.6-acre site at its meeting on May 23, 2005. Now that the Boundary Review Board has approved this annexation, the Council must decide whether it wants to go ahead and accept it, and, if so, decide what zoning classification would be applied to it when it comes into the City. Tonight's public hearing is being held for this purpose. The site currently has King County's R-4 zoning, which allows 4 units per gross acre outright and bonuses up to 6 units per gross acre. The subject site is designated Residential Single Family (RS) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Future zoning, consistent with this designation, would be Renton's R-8 (8 units per net acre) zone. This is the same zoning that exists on the surrounding properties in the City on the annexation site's southern and western boundaries (see back of handout). With the City's R-8 zoning, the 10.6-acre site could accommodate approximately 63 single-family detached dwelling units, at full development. Under the County's R-4 zoning, it could accommodate as many as 58 units. As previoiusly noted, reviewing departments have raised no major objections to this annexation. The Administration is recommending that Council: • Adopt the 10.6-acre Lindberg Annexation by ordinance; and, • Adopt by ordinance, R-8 zoning for it, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's RS land use designaton shown for it. Public Hearing Handout 12-05-05.doc\ 2 \ \§ \� 7:1 \ \ \ \ � \ } \ �� % ) } \ cn Zw o7:7, SE cl'q O oa ", rD 14 777 LA Fr :z S Z! Ro in ,LL o � ; § � \ / cc /Vkf) � � { \ : \ \ ƒ \ al \ /E to ® - k§ § k . - 2 ECl #R §f /E § .§ \ y 2 & 3 = } 3 \ Y EXTENSION OF EAST RENTON PLATEAU SEWER MORATORIUM PUBLIC HEARING December 5, 2005 In June of this year, in response to a citizen group, Citizens Allied for a Responsible Evendall (CARE), Council passed Resolution 3758 establishing a six-month moratorium on sewer availabilities for new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. The purpose of the moratorium was to allow consideration of a proposed annexation petition for the East Renton Plateau prior to vesting developable properties under County development standards. The present moratorium expires December 6th, 2005. On November 15, 2005, CARE submitted an annexation petition to the City designating an annexation boundary, and calling for an election. The petition was submitted by Renton to King County Elections for certification, and, if certified, the Renton City Council will consider a resolution within the next 60 days supporting the proposed annexation and setting an election date. Extension of the moratorium will continue the present City position of allowing the election outcome to determine whether City or County standards will guide development within this community. It is recommended that the moratorium be extended with the understanding that: 1) If the election fails, then the moratorium automatically expires or is repealed and King County standards will be used to vest subdivisions with out -of -city sewer requests. 2) If the election passes, then the moratorium will be extended through the time Renton either formally annexes the area or successfully negotiates an interlocal agreement with King County to allow review of subdivisions using Renton development standards. 3) The area of the moratorium shall continue to include that portion of the sewer service area that is within the entire East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area, rather than the smaller area included within the current proposed annexation. The Administration recommends that the moratorium continue to cover the entire East Renton Potential Annexation area, generally defined as that portion of the service area east of the current city limits bounded by the Plat of White Fence Ranch and the urban growth boundary to the north, Plat of Maplewood Heights and the City limits to the west and the urban growth boundary to the south and east. This original boundary should continue to be used because the Boundary Review Board has the authority to modify the annexation boundary by 5% of its proposed acreage, and there is as yet no indication of which areas might be either included or excluded. H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\East Renton Plateau PAA\Moratorium Extension Hearing Handout 12-05.doc Should the City continue to restrict out of city sewer availabilities in the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area pending an election annexation? Background ■ Moratorium enacted in response to citizen's group CARE • Council supported CARE request to let citizens determine election outcome prior to providing sewer outside the City ■ Council indicated continued support if the 10% petition was filed ■ Moratorium expires Dec. 6, 2005 Public Hearing Out of City Sewer Service Moratorium City Council December 5, 2005 Proposal: Continue the Moratorium in the designated area ■ Sewer availabilities allow property owners to vest for development under King County standards ■ Moratorium covers new sewer availabilities ■ Annexation proponents prefer Renton development standards Annexation petition submitted ■ CARE submitted a 10% petition requesting an election annexation ■ Save Our Plateau Annexation ■ 391 signatures ■ 270 required ■ The petition is being certified • Boundary does not include the entire PAA • Excludes White Fence Ranch • Excludes Maplewood Heights Proposed Annexation Boundary VS Moratorium Boundary f µ }# :. k �rjjltP arh.rauixur.8nn t- %rze - Santary Sewer Moratorium Extension Area Difference between Renton and King County standards ■ Renton land use single family -No multi -family ■ Small increment of density (Renton is equal to or less density due to gross vs. net density) • Road width ■ Lot size and setbacks Public Process ■ Upon certification the City Council will review the petition ■ With 60 days ■ Council will either approve or reject by resolution ■ If approved, Council will request King County to set an election date ■ Earliest possible election date • April/May Moratorium Boundary ■ Different from Proposed Annexation Boundary ■ Include several areas not included In the CARE petition ■ Larger moratorium area is needed - some property owners outside the petition boundary want to be added - The boundary review board can change the boundary SX - No analysis of where that 5% might occur Difference between Renton and King County standards ■ Landscape standards ■ Quality of road construction standards ( gravel base and thickness of asphalt) ■ Standard curbs (rolled in County) ■ Secondary access ■ Parks mitigation Recommendation ■ Extend the moratorium for six months • Allows the Council to consider the annexation petition ■ Allows a date to be set for an election • Allows the registered voters in the area to determine election outcome before resuming sewer avallabilities 2 Publie- 14wrmg Benda Vem -y ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC +, ,` PLANNING DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 30, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council CC: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator W` STAFF CONTACT: Rebecca Lind, Planning Manager (ext. 6588) SUBJECT: Extension of Sewer Moratorium for Sewer Service to New Subdivisions Outside City Limits on the East Renton Plateau ISSUE: Should the City extend the existing moratorium on sewer availabilities for new subdivisions on the East Renton Plateau for an additional six months? RECOMMENDATION: 1a-5-a005 Extend the current moratorium on sewer availability for new subdivision requests on the plateau to allow the Citizens Allied for a Responsible Evendall (CARE) group to actively pursue this annexation. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: In June of this year, in response to a citizen group, CARE, Council passed Resolution 3758 establishing a six-month moratorium on sewer availabilities for new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. The purpose of the moratorium was to allow consideration of a proposed annexation petition for the East Renton Plateau prior to vesting developable properties under County development standards. The present moratorium expires December 6, 2005. The original impetus for the moratorium was based on CARE's preference that development meet all of Renton's development standards including lot setbacks, lot width, lot depths, and landscape standards. They believe that the adopted Renton standards best meet their view of preserving the distinct character of their community. CARE is concerned that if the larger parcels of land vest under the lesser standards, then H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\East Renton Plateau PAA\Extension of Sewer Moratorium Issue Paper.doc Terri Briere, Council President Page 2 of 3 November 30, 2005 Renton will not be able to effectively implement the new land use policy adopted by Council in 2004, upon annexation. The CARE leadership also believes that allowing development to occur under King County standards will cause a perception that Renton is not following through on the R-4 zoning. They feel this perception could result in an anti -Renton backlash. On November 15, 2005, CARE submitted an annexation petition to the City designating an annexation boundary and calling for an election. The petition was submitted by Renton to King County Elections for certification, and, if certified, the Renton City Council will consider a resolution within the next 60 days supporting the proposed annexation and setting an election date. Extension of the moratorium will continue the present City position of allowing the election outcome to determine whether the City or County standards will guide development within this community. It is recommended that the moratorium be extended with the understanding that: 1) If the election fails, then the moratorium automatically expires or is repealed and King County standards will be used to vest subdivisions with out -of -city sewer requests. 2) If the election passes, then the moratorium will be extended through the time Renton either formally annexes the area or successfully negotiates an interlocal agreement with King County to allow review of subdivision using Renton development standards. However, an additional public hearing and resolution would be required to extend it beyond six months. 3) The area of the moratorium shall continue to cover the entire East Renton Potential Annexation Area, generally defined as that portion of the service area east of the current city limits bounded by the Plat of White Fence Ranch and the urban growth boundary to the north, Plat of Maplewood Heights and the city limits to the west, and the urban growth boundary to the south and east. The original boundary should continue to be used because the Boundary Review Board has the authority to modify the annexation boundary by 5% of its proposed acreage, and there is as yet no indication of which areas might be either included or excluded. In addition, some property owners outside the proposed annexation boundary indicated an interest in being included. An additional petition for lands excluded from the present petition boundary could be received during this six-month moratorium period. CONCLUSION: One of the primary goals for establishing the current code for sewer service outside the city limits was to provide for a long-term vehicle for approaching annexation on the plateau. With the current work being performed by CARE, Staff feels this goal will be H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\East Renton Plateau PAA\Extension of Sewer Moratorium Issue Paper.doc Terri Briere, Council President Page 3 of 3 November 30, 2005 better achieved by allowing CARE to proceed with its annexation plans and providing an additional six-month window of no new sewer availabilities for new subdivisions. By giving this group all the tools possible to work with the property owners in this area, the potential for success is greatly enhanced. cc: Gregg Zimmerman, PBPW Administrator Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Dave Christensen, Utility Engineering Supervisor H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\East Renton Plateau PAA\Extension of Sewer Moratorium Issue Paper.doc k6%ic Ream y /a - s =-zcos 6"C_id ft^t k4ao, Comments to the Renton City Council December 5, 2005 hearing on the sewer certificate moratorium My name is Tom Carpenter. I live at 15006 SE 139th Place in Renton. I'm also an elected member of the Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council representing 3 of the voting districts inside the East Plateau Potential Annexation Area. I rise tonight in favor of any actions that postpone development on the East Renton Plateau until such time as design templates and rules sensitive to the character of the neighborhood are put in place and enforced. As a result, I am in favor of extending the sewer certificate moratorium for the plateau. I made similar comments at the original moratorium meeting June 20, 2005. At that time I mentioned that, although I supported the moratorium, I was concerned that, without the proper focus, we ran the risk of tragically being in a worse quality of life condition at the end of the moratorium period. That prediction, unfortunately, has come true. Recently, King County and the Four Creeks UAC surveyed residents of the plateau asking specifically about the residents feelings about the build out so far. I quote from the published results: "In nearly -unanimous fashion, community members dislike the recent development in the East Renton Plateau. Some blame King County, some blame the City of Renton, and some blame the developers, but nearly all respondents cite recent developments as unattractive. They use adjectives like "ugly," "boxy," "over -dense," and "poorly -planned" to describe the development, which they see as the antithesis of the lifestyle they sought when buying homes on the East Renton Plateau." Clone homes (similar designs just different shades of beige) along 128th, 10 different frontage fence designs/materials/colors in the 4 tenths of a mile west of 156th Ave SE, and only 1 people place (a sitting area outside a Starbucks) along the entire 5.4 mile length of SE 128th between Interstate 405 and Lake Kathleen are examples of the concerns being expressed. Although, through the efforts of Gwen High and her team, meaningful progress has been made in the area of annexation for a major portion of the plateau, annexation is NOT going to deal with the quality of life issues in a timely manner. Long before the annexation vote, Renton and King County need to create an inter -.local agreement that addresses at least 1) the movement of funds to support planning efforts for the plateau, and 2) the establishment of critical design standards appended to the permitting process used by King County DDES (assuming that permitting cannot be transferred to Renton.) These design standards should include a set of templates and rules for development on the plateau that address urban livability issues sensitive to the specific character and vision for the plateau. Initially, the inter -local should focus on the most visible parts of the build out which implies focus on the major traffic, business, and common use areas. This means NE 4th/SE 128th, 156th SE all the way down to Maple Valley Highway, and the major connectors to Sunset Highway and May Valley Road. To this end, I briefed Reagan Dunn, King County Council Member -elect for this district, on this subject a couple weeks ago. Reagan stands prepared to support a request from Renton for just such an inter -local agreement. The Four Creeks UAC, along with the 5 other UACs in King County, concerned that lack of focus on livable urban spaces, like the plateau, will eventually jeopardize Growth Management's intent to keep development out of the rural areas are preparing an outline for the inter -local agreements between the potential annexation cities and the county. I would be pleased to offer this work to Renton. I call upon the Mayor and Councilmember Clawson, chair of the Planning and Development Committee to take advantage of Reagan's offer and put in place the developmental guidelines necessary to reverse the trend currently being experienced by the residents on the plateau. And I call upon the Council to extend the moratorium as a means to assure those guidelines are in place before any new permits are allowed. 1) Qk, geariny & mtnoi Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell Annexation Committee Sf-(�, JY19✓ta�f7jrd�C�'J P.O. Box 2936 Renton, WA 98056 highlands—neighbors@hotmail.com Renton City Council Meeting December 5, 2005 RE: Extension of the current sewer moratorium for new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau PAA Dear Council Members, Thank you for renewed attention to this issue of such concern in our community. We offer thanks as well for the original implementation of this moratorium in June of this year. This moratorium has indeed achieved much in line with the expectations that we sited in our original request: • It pushed the "Pause" button on the outside development pressures active in our community so that we, the residents, had an opportunity to engage in a thoughtful and thorough evaluation of our options in regard to the annexation question, and • Out of this spirited discourse, a consensus has begun to rise as recorded by the submission of our 10% Petition to Commence Annexation Proceedings which we tendered November 15, and ■ It demonstrated a real, practical and very visible expression of Renton's good faith on one of the issues of highest concern in this community. We urge you to extend this sewer moratorium. We see it as one of many critical steps being undertaken by our community through the larger annexation discussion and process. Progress has been made, but as one of you so shrewdly observed in the original debate, the resolution of the annexation question will, and should, take time. We are doing all we can, and tonight we look to you to continue to demonstrate forethought and forthrightness by voting to extend this moratorium. ■ It build on the positive momentum already growing in the community, and • It holds the opportunity window open so that together we can preserve the character of our community and our quality of life. As the Preserve Our Plateau 10% Petition itself says, there are still other vital steps to be checked on the list - particularly the refinement of zoning and building regulations - and we look forward to continued cooperation and progress toward the best future for all of us - for the city, our current neighbors and for the new neighborhoods to come. Please vote to extend the temporary sewer moratorium. Thank You,, Gwendolyn Hh CAREAC chair/treasurer CARE president a � ceN,�� CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION • Everyone is invited to stroll through Coulon Memorial Beach Park and see the beautiful Clam Lights holiday display, which will shine nightly through January 1st. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • Would you like to help children and families who are less fortunate? Join in the holiday spirit and share in the Angel Tree Program. Trees with tags representing requests from families screened by the Renton Salvation Army are available this year at City locations, including the Renton Community Center, City Hall, and Carco Theatre. For more information about this program, please call Captain Christine Giffey-Brohaugh at 425-255-5969. • Come and enjoy the Renton City Concert Band's Holiday Concert on Thursday, December 8th at 7:30 p.m., at the IKEA Performing Arts Center. Tickets will be available at the door for $7 for adults and $5 for students and seniors. • Children ages 2 to 12 are invited to a special Saturday breakfast with Santa on December loth. Parents, grandparents and kids can enjoy a fabulous breakfast and wonderful entertainment. Children must be accompanied by an adult. Two seatings, at 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., are available. Advance tickets are required and are now on sale. Cost is $6 per person. For more information, call the Renton Senior Activity Center at 425-430-6633 • Take in still more holiday music at the Renton Youth Symphony Orchestra's Holiday Concert on Sunday, December 1 lth at 3:00 p.m., at Carco Theatre. Tickets will be available at the door for $7 for adults and $5 for students and seniors. • The annual Candy Cane Canine Fun Run & Walk will be held on Sunday, December 1 lth, beginning at 9 a.m. at the Renton Community Center. This is a great family activity with or without a dog! Free photos with Santa will be available after the race. Pre -registration is $15 (includes a t-shirt) before December 2nd. Thereafter, including race day, registration is $20 (no t-shirt guaranteed). The event also includes a pet food drive. Administrative Report December 5, 2005 Page 2 Work on large red oak trees will occur in December at the south beach of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Five trees have branches that are encroaching across the fence into the adjacent Bristol Apartments property. Four trees will be pruned and one tree removed to enhance spacing and growth for adjacent overcrowded trees. Work is expected to begin Saturday, December 17th. FINANCE & INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT Audio Video improvements were made to the Council Conference Room this past week. In addition to a permanent LCD projector mounted in the ceiling, a video / VHS player with full television capabilities was also installed. The large television in the room has been removed. PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • The Washington State Department of Transportation will host an Open House related to the Renton I-405 Nickel Improvement Project on Thursday, December 8th, from 4:00 to 7:00 p.m. at the Renton Housing Authority, 2900 NE loth Street. The focus of the meeting will be to present and review with the public draft discipline reports written for the Environmental Assessment. For more information, call 425-456-8555. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. Community Services Staff Contact...... Peter Renner Ext. 6605 Subject: Reallocation of Fund 316 Major Maintenance Public Buildings to support replacement of the Tiffany Park Recreation Building (TPRB). Exhibits: Issue Paper — TBRB Project History with attachments L n Al #: • For Agenda of. 12/5/05 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept ..... x.... Finance De t..x... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $95,220 Transfer/Amendment....... $95,220 Amount Budgeted....... $206,000 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $301,220 City Share Total Project.. X SUMMARY OF ACTION: Original funding for the project was available from a WCIA insurance settlement for the Narco property building that burned. The settlement did not provide full funding for this high -priority project. Staff seeks approval to use project savings from other 2005 CIP projects to fund the construction. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the use of project savings dollars for the Tiffany Park Recreation Building. Rentonnedagnbill/ bb n7, COMMUNITY SERVICES *DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 21, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Peter Renner, Facilities Director X6605 SUBJECT: Tiffany Park Recreation Building Update Issue: Should Council approve additional funds for the Tiffany Park Recreation Building? Recommendation: Approve using 2005 CIP project savings to fully fund the Tiffany Park Recreation Building. Background: The 2005 Capital Improvement Budget includes replacement of the Tiffany Park Recreation Building. The City received a WCIA settlement of $204,750 for the fire loss of a recreation building on the Narco site. Council will recall that the existing Tiffany Park Recreation Building is quite small, 800 square feet, severely limiting the types of recreation programs that can be run at this site. The existing building is also in very bad condition, having developed wood rot and mold from water intrusion in the past. Further, the floor joists are rotting from the bottom up because the foundation does not drain properly, and the crawl space is pervious to moisture. An architect with considerable park building experience was retained to develop plans and specifications for a replacement building. Recreation staff provided programming input that resulted in a building with a minimum footprint larger than original assumptions, due in part to the relative isolation of Tiffany Park from other City recreation facilities, due in another part to the increase in the number of children in the neighborhood. issuepapertprb.doc Terri Briere, Council President November 21, 2005 Page 2 of 3 A general contractor's preliminary cost estimate was well beyond the insurance reimbursement. We simplified the design of the building and used the lowest cost finishing materials consistent with low continuing operating and maintenance costs. You are probably already aware of the construction materials cost increases that occurred this year. Further, we eliminated elements such as exterior decks, landscaping, and furnishings that can be added in future years without impacting mechanical systems or the foundation. We investigated a range of building alternatives: • We considered a modular building provided by the State contract holder as well as stick framing on site. The modular building approach provided no construction cost savings. • Another approach was to integrate a manufactured building from the Renton Municipal Airport that was offered to the City by Boeing. However, the cost of disassembling and moving the structure, and the cost of making substantial changes to it, outweighed the advantage that it was available at no cost. In the meanwhile, another Boeing division asked to have it back. • Finally, we discussed general contracting the project internally, using Facility Division management and labor, and/or volunteer group labor for portions of the work, not unlike a Habit for Humanity project. The City Attorney researched this option and responded that there is a project limit of $35,000 for City staff - contracted public work. The work will have to go to public bid, even though it is a relatively simple project. Recently, we engaged the services of a construction cost -estimating firm to provide cost projections based on standard building practices and features. Their worksheets are attached, along with our departmental summary for the finished project cost. With a 10% construction cost contingency allowance, these costs total $339,760. Funds to supplement the original project budget are available from cost savings on other 2005 CIP projects. ■ Four -thousand five hundred dollars ($4,500) from a revised solution to deal with FS 11 sewer problems. ■ Fifty Thousand ($50,000) for a new security panel at City Hall because of extensive problems with the existing panel in the last few years. However, we made a change in the panel service contractor, and it appears that adjustments they have made isolated the electronic problems that were occurring, and restored the functionality and reliability of the existing panel. ■ Sixteen Thousand dollars ($16,000) remaining project balance from the P3 resurfacing project ■ Eleven Thousand dollars ($11,000) remaining balance from P3 water mitigation/irrigation repair projects ■ Twenty-two Thousand dollars ($22,650) remaining balance from Carco Wing wall repair project. issuepapertprb.doc Terri Briere, Council President November 21, 2005 Page 3 of 3 ■ Thirty -Six Thousand two hundred dollars ($36,200) remaining balance from Public Works Shop intrusion alarm system project. ■ Five -thousand four -hundred dollars ($5,400) remaining balance FS 12 HVAC unit replacement. ■ However, we also had some additional unexpected expenditures from 316 Major Maintenance, Public Buildings. There was demolition work and fencing at the FS 15 site ($44,723), reengineering of the aquatic center boiler system ($4,153), and an engineering review and testing of the Renton City Hall curtain wall system after a spandrel panel blew out during a storm ($1,681). ■ The savings balance available in this account totals $95,220. Combined with the original insurance payments, that totals $301,220 available to complete the project. Because of the high priority of this project, we are also suggesting that the difference of $38,540 can be made up by further cost reductions in the project, in the form of bid alternatives, if necessary. Conclusion: Compared to other areas of the City, the isolated Tiffany Park area is underserved in the area of recreation facilities. The recreation structure there is undersized and exceeded its useful life years ago. We recommend Council approval of the use of project savings to fully support the construction of a new Tiffany Park Recreation Building. Attachments issuepapertprb.doc SD Estimate TIFFANY PARK Renton, Washington August 23, 2005 2005.016.01 i IN I Prepared For: Gensler + Seattle Seattle, Washington C3 Management Group Inc. 2484 North Moenavi Circle St. George, Utah 84770-4858 Tel (425) 828-2468 Fax (425) 828-2788 h1tp:;%C3MG.com E-mail: dpoffi@C3MG.com TIFFANY PARK Site Development Estimate Summary DIRECT COSTS DESIGN CONTINGENCY Subtotal GENERAL CONDITIONS Subtotal HOME OFFICE OVERHEAD Subtotal CONTRACTOR FEE Subtotal CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES GEO ENGINEERING BUILDING PERMITS DEMOLITION Subtotal WSST TOTAL 8% 5% 5% 10% 210,253 11,025 221,278 17,702 238,980 11,995 250,835 11,792 247,627 24,762 24,090 8,000 2,900 4,900 312,279 27,481 339,760 TIFFANY PARK Renton, Washington SD ESTIMATE C3 MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. C3 MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. P.O. BOX 2056 2484 N. MOENAVI CIRCLE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98083-2056 ST. GEORGE, UTAH 84770 VOICE:425-828-2468 FAX:425-828-2788 2005.016.01 http://www.C3MG.com Description Quantity Unit $ Total $ Element 0111 WALL FOUNDATION CONCRETE PERIMETER FOOTINGS 180.00 LNFT 46.00 8,280 Tota I Element 0111 WALL FOUNDATION S8,Y80 Element 0112 COLUMN FOUNDATION CONCRETE COLUMN FOOTINGS 14.00 EACH 125.00 1,750 Total Element 0112 COLUMN FOUNDATION $1,750 Element 0118 FOUNDATION DRAIN PERIMETER DRAINAGE SYSTEM 180.00 LNFT 10.81 1,946 Total Element 0118 FOUNDATION DRAIN $1,946 Element 0211 STANDARD SLAB ON GRADE ENGINEERED FILL UNDER SOG 200.00 CUYD 24.38 4,876 4"/6" SOG 1.800.00 SQFT 3.50 6,300 Total Element 0211 STANDARD SLAB ON GRADE $11,176 Element 0313 DECKS DECK 232.00 SQFT 22.00 5,104 Total Element 0313 DECKS $5,104 Element 0322 PITCHED ROOF STRUCTURAL TUBING 23.21 CWT 168.69 3,915 ROOF FRAME: GLB, JOISTS, PLYWOOD 2,400.00 SQFT 6.50 15,600 Total Element 0322 PITCHED ROOF $19,515 Element 0411 EXTERIOR WALL 6" SPLIT FACE BLOCK 720.00 SQFT 13.67 9,842 3/4" AC/CD PLYWOOD 80.00 SQFT 1.87 150 WOOD FURRING 720.00 SQFT 1.11 800 6"WOOD STUD FRAMING 1,209.00 SQFT 1.97 2,387 2" RIGID INSULATION 720.00 SQFT 1.28 924 R19 BATT INSULATION 1,209.00 SQFT 0.75 905 METAL SIDING 1,129.00 SQFT 4.00 4,516 5/8" GWB, X, T&F ON WALL 1.929.00 SQFT 1.49 2,872 GYPSUM SHEATHING 1,209.00 SQFT 0.96 1,159 Total Element 0411 EXTERIOR WALL $23,553 Element 0415 EXTERIOR SOFFIT METAL SOFFIT 600.00 SQFT 4.50 2,700 Total Element 0415 EXTERIOR SOFFIT $2,700 Element 0421 WINDOW ALUM WINDOW, OPER, DEL GLAZED 288.00 SQFT 28.00 8,064 HORIZONTAL BLINDS,1",STEEL 288.00 SQFT 3.50 1,008 Total Element0421 WINDOW $9,072 Element 0423 EXTERIOR DOOR & FRAME HM FRAME, 3-0 X 7-0 3.00 EACH 137.06 411 2005.015.01.est Page 2 8/23/2005 TIFFANY PARK Renton, Washington SD ESTIMATE C3 MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. ApiwArAIIIIIIIIII C3 MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. P.O. BOX 2056 2484 N. MOENAVI CIRCLE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98083-2056 ST. GEORGE, UTAH 84770 VOICE:425-828-2468 FAX:425-828-2788 2005.016.01 http://www.C3MG.Com Description Quantity Unit $ Total $ ALUM FRAME, 6-0 X 7-0 1.00 EACH 663.83 664 HM DOOR, 3-0 X 7-0 3.00 EACH 252.87 759 ALUM DOOR, GLASS, 3-0 X 7-0 2.00 EACH 1,315.05 2,630 PANIC HARDWARE DEVICE, PAIR 1.00 EACH 1,736.62 1,737 F1N.HDWRE.-SGL,EXTER,PASSAGE 3.00 EACH 500.15 1,500 FIN.HDWRE.-DBL,EXTER,PASSAGE 1.00 EACH 866.28 866 PAINT DOOR & FRAME, SINGLE 3.00 EACH 40.39 121 Tota I Element 0423 EXTERIOR DOOR & FRAME $8,688 Element 0431 CANOPY ENTRY CANOPY 100.00 SQFT 25.00 2,500 Total Element 0431 CANOPY $2,500 Element 0501 ROOF COVERING STANDING SEAM ROOF, 24 GA 2,400.00 SQFT 7.25 17,399 Total Element0501 ROOF COVERING $17,399 Element 0503 ROOF INSULATION & FILL 4" RIGID POLYISO INSULATION 2,400.00 SQFT 2.40 5,759 Total Element 0503 ROOF INSULATION & FILL $5,759 Element 0504 FLASHING & TRIM GALVANIZED GUTTER 61.00 LNFT 12.00 732 GALVANIZED DOWNSPOUT 20.00 LNFT 9.00 180 Total Element 0504 FLASHING & TRIM $912 Element 0611 FIXED PARTITION STUDS & PLATES WD FIRM CONST 1,537.78 BDFT 1.29 1,980 R19 BATT INSULATION 1,534.00 SQFT 0.75 1,149 5/8" FIRECODE GYPSUM BOARD 3.068.00 SQFT 1.46 4,475 Total Element 0611 FIXED PARTITION $7,604 Element 0616 INTERIOR DOORS & FRAMES HIM FRAME, 3-0 X 7-0 6.o0 EACH 137.06 822 SC DOOR, OAK, 3-0 X 7-0 6.00 EACH 293.92 1,764 FIN.HDWRE.-SGL,INTER,PASSAGE 6.00 EACH 359.83 2,159 H.M. RELIGHT FRAME W/ GLASS 28.00 SQFT 30.75 861 PAINT FRAME ONLY, SINGLE 6.00 EACH 2O.57 123 STAIN/SEAL DOOR, SINGLE 6.00 EACH 35.34 212 Total Element 0616 INTERIOR DOORS & FRAMES $5,941 Element 0621 WALL FINISH FRP PANELS AT M&W WAINSCOT 208.00 SQFT 5.00 1,040 PAINT WALL 1.00 SQFT 0.60 1 Total Element 0621 WALL FINISH $1,040 Element 0622 FLOOR FINISH STAIN CONCRETE FLOOR 1,800.00 SQFT 3.00 5,400 Total Element 0622 FLOOR FINISH $5,400 2005.015.01.est Page 3 8/23/2005 TIFFANY PARK Renton, Washington SD ESTIMATE C3 MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. C3 MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC. P.O. BOX 2056 2484 N. MOENAVI CIRCLE KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98083-2056 ST. GEORGE, UTAH 84770 VOICE:425-828-2468 FAX:425-828-2788 2005.016.01 http://www.C3MG.com Description Quantity Unit; Total $ Element 0623 CEILING FINISH STAIN EXPOSED STRUCTURE 1,800.00 SQFT 0.75 1,350 Total Element 0623 CEILING FINISH $1,350 Element 0631 GENERAL SPECIALTIES MISC. SPECIALTIES ALLOWANCE 1,800.00 SQFT 1.00 1,800 Total Element 0631 GENERAL SPECIALTIES $1,800 Element 0632 BUILT-IN FITTINGS/CASEWORK BASE CABINET, 1-SHELF & DOOR 12.00 LNFT 82.06 985 WALL CABINET, DBL DOOR 12.00 LNFT 66.47 798 PLASTIC LAM. COUNTER TOP 12.00 LNFT 27.95 335 VANITY TOP W/ APRON 8.00 LNFT 38.52 308 RECEPTION DESK 12.00 LNFT 219.80 2,638 Total Element 0632 BUILT-IN FITTINGS/CASEWORK $5,064 Element 0810 PLUMBING SYSTEMS PLUMBING SYSTEM 7,00 FIXT 2,800.00 19,600 Total Element 0810 PLUMBING SYSTEMS $19,600 Element 0830 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS SPRINKLER SYSTEM NIC Total Element 0830 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS Element 0840 HEATING/COOLING SYSTEMS RADIANT HOT WATER FLOOR HEAT 1,800.00 SQFT 7.50 13,500 HEAT PUMP COOLING 1,800.00 SQFT 5.00 9,000 Total Element O840 HEATINGICOOLING SYSTEMS $22,500 Element 0900 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ELECTRICAL ALLOWANCE 1,800.00 SQFT 12.00 21,600 Total Element 0900 ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS $21,600 ESTIMATE TOTALS $210,253 2005.015.01.est Page 4 8/23/2005 Gensler Architecture and Planning Worldwide City of Renton - Tiffany Park Recreation Building Fee Analysis - WA 3 Gensler Subtotal PM Designe Job Captain 1 hrs $$ hrs wks $$ hrs wks $$ hrs wks $$ Schematic Design Document Sustainable Strategies 2 $150 0 0 21 1 150 Site Plan 3 $278 0.5 1 60 0.5 1 68 21 1 150 Programming / Site Lines / Adjacencies verification 2 $203 0.5 1 60 0.5 1 68 1 1 75 Floor Plan 3 $278 0.5 1 60 0.5 1 68 2 1 150 Building Elevations 4 $353 0.5 1 60 0.5 1 68 3 1 225 Perspective Sketch (1) 4 $353 0.5 1 601 68 3 1 225 Prepare Draft SD Package for Pricing & Owner rev. 2.5 $210 0.5 1 601 Ol 2 1 150 Review Cost Estimate and provide clarification 2 $225 1 1 1201 0.51 1 681 0.51 1 38 Owner Review Meeting Review Meeting w/ City of Renton Facilities Team 2 $240 2 1 240 0 0 Schematic Design Revisions (Minor) If required 10 $855 1 1 1201 11 11 1351 81 1 600 Prepare Final SD Package for Owner 2.5 $2101 0.51 11 601 1 1 01 21 11 150 Owner Follow Up Meeting Deliver Package and meet w/ City of Renton 2 $2401 21 11 2401 1 1 01 1 0 9.51 1 1,1401 41 1 540125.51 1,913 Schematic Design Subtotal 1 39 $3,593 Design Development Incorporate Sustainable Strategies 2.5 $210 0.51 1 60 0 2 1 150 Site Plan 2.5 $210 0.51 1 60 0 2 1 150 Verity Program Requirements 2 $203 0.51 1 60 0.5 1 68 1 1 75 Floor Plan 5 $428 0.51 1 60 0.5 1 68 4 1 300 Reflected Ceiling Plan 2.511 10 0.51 1 60 0 2 1 150 Roof Plan 2.5 $210 0.51 1 60 0 21 1 150 Building Elevations 5.5 $495 0.51 1 60 11 1 135 4 1 300 Building Sections 2.5 $210 0.5 1 60 0 2 1 150 Critical Wall Sections / Details 8.5 $660 0.5 1 60 0 8 1 600 Prepare Draft DD Package for Pricing & Owner rev. 5 $428 0.5 1 60 0.5 1 68 4 1 300 Review Cost Estimate and provide clarification 3. $$383 2 11 240 0.5 1 68 1 1 75 lhvner Review Meeting Review Meeting w/ City of Renton Facilities Team (1) 4 $390 2 1 240 0 2 1 150 Design Development Revisions (Minor) If required 10 $855 1 1 1201 11 11 135 8 1 600 Prepare Final DD Package for Owner 4.5 $3601 0.51 11 601 1 1 01 41 1 300 Owner Follow Up Meeting Deliver Package and meet w/ City of Renton 2 $2401 21 11 240 1 1 0 0 112.51 1 1,5001 41 1 5401 461 3,450 Design Development Subtotal 162.51 $5,490 Revised 9/13/2005 Gensler Architecture and Planning Worldwide Construction Documents Site Plan 8.5 $660 0.5 1 60 0 8 1 600 Floor Plan 8.5 $660 0.5 1 60 0 8 1 600 Reflected Ceiling Plan 4.5 $360 0.5 1 60 0 4 1 300 Roof Plan 4.5 $360 0.5 1 60 _ 0 4 1 300 Building Elevations 9.5 $795 0.5 1 60 1 1 135 8 1 600 Building Sections 4.5 $360 0.51 1 60 01 41 1 300 Critical Wall Sections 9 $720 11 11 120 0 8 1 600 Details 38 $3,150 4 1 480 2 1 270 32 1 2,400 Quality Assurance Review / Pickup 11 $975 2 1 240 1 1 135 8 1 600 Prepare Draft CD Package for Pricing & Owner rev. 4.5 $360 0.5 1 60 0E4] 1 300 Review Cost Estimate and provide clarification 4 $450 2 1 240 1 1 135 1 75 Owner Review Meeting Review Meeting w/ City of Renton Facilities Team (1) 2 $2401 21 11 2401 1 1 01 1 1 0 Construction Documents Revisions (Minor) If required 12 $1,110 21 11 2401 21 1 1 2701 81 1 600 Prepare Final DD Package for Owner 4.5 $3601 0.51 11 601 1 1 01 41 1 300 Owner Follow Up Meeting Deliver Package and meet w/ City of Renton 2 $2401 21 11 240 1 1 01 1 0 19 2,280 7 945 101 7,575 Construction Documents Subtotal 1 127 $10, ruction Administration Site visits (8 total) Minutes by GC Review and Responses to RFI's (up to Submittal Reviews Design Development Subtotal 1 95 $7,800 Grand Total 1 324 $27, Additional Scope: Construction Administration Upon Owner request and approval of WA, Gensler will provide additional construction administration services such as substitution request reviews, field changes, additional site visits, etc. Revised 9/13/2005 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Community Services Department Dept/Div/Board. Parks Maintenance Division Staff Contact. Leslie Betlach (x-6619) Subject: Contract award to JGM Landscape Architects for a Master Plan of the tri-park complex (Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the NARCO property) Exhibits: A. Issue Paper B. Contract Recommended Action: Council Concur AI #: For Agenda of: December 5, 2005 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution ............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: $84,190.00 Expenditure Required $84,190.00 Transfer/Amendment....... N/A Amount Budgeted $95,000.00 Revenue Generated......... N/A Total Project Budget $84,190.00 City Share Total Project.. X SUMMARY OF ACTION: The proposed consultant contract would provide for evaluating current uses and future needs, conducting a series of public meetings, soliciting citizen input, incorporating future I-405 development plans, and coordinating with recreational user groups to develop a master plan for the Cedar River Park, Liberty Park and Narco Property. Funding for this planning effort was approved in the 2005 City Budget. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Award a Consultant Contract to JGM Landscape Architects in the amount of $84,190.00 for a Tri-Park Master Plan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract. 1:\2005 Files\2005-146mb (Agenda Bill -Cedar Rv Greenway Project).doc U6 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT , ""� M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 23, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA:K,,/Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator _�h vvl� STAFF CONTACT: Leslie Betlach, Parks Director (x-6619) SUBJECT: Contract Award to JGM Landscape Architects ISSUE Should a contract be awarded to JGM Landscape Architects for the development of a master plan for Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the Narco Property? RECOMMENDATION Award the contract to JGM Landscape Architects to develop a tri-park master plan involving Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the NARCO property. BACKGROUND SUMMARY Council approved, as part of the 2005 budget, the expenditure of $95,000.00 to develop a Long Range Master Plan for the integrated use of Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the NARCO Property. The Community Services Department negotiated a contract with JGM Landscape Architects to undertake the development of such a master plan for Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the Narco Property to include consideration of the I-405 Improvement Project. The project scope contains a site reconnaissance, Community Workshops, Open Houses, Park Board Meetings, and Council Briefings in order to gather public input in the Master Plan Development Process. The contract cost will be $84,190.00. The consultant will coordinate with the Washington State Department of Transportation in the I-405 improvements and incorporate conceptual design elements developed by the I-405 Charette Team. The IA2005 Files12005-145mb (Issue Paper Memo -Cedar Rv Greenway Project).doc Memorandum Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Contract Award to JGM Landscape Architects November 23, 2005 Page 2 of 2 final product will be a Master Plan Update that will guide the City of Renton through re -development and new development within this park complex in order to meet the future needs of Renton residents, while providing optimum recreational opportunities with the available property. The existing Cedar River Greenway Master Plan will be updated as part of this effort to provide context to the Tri-Park Plan Development. CONCLUSION This contract will allow the City of Renton to enter into an agreement with JGM Landscape Architects to provide future direction to developments at Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the Narco Property, while considering the changes dictated by the I-405 regional projects. 1A2005 Files12005-145mb (Issue Paper Memo -Cedar Rv Greenway Project).doc -y o� DESIGN CONSULTANT AGREEMENT CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT This agreement, made and entered into this , day of , 20 by and between the City of Renton, hereafter called the "City," and JGM Landscape Architects, hereafter called the "Consultant." The Consultant agrees to provide professional engineering services required in connection with the Tri-Park Master Plan (Liberty Park, Cedar River Park and the NARCO Property) Project, as described in the Scope of Work below. The City agrees to compensate the Consultant as set forth below under payment of fees. A. SCOPE OF WORK/BASIC SERVICES The Consultant agrees to provide professional services for the design portions of the Project as specified in Exhibit A, the Scope of Services. B. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Provide location for meetings and host meetings. 2. Provide information maps and information from City of Renton files. C. ADDED SERVICES The City agrees to pay the Consultant for any services provided under added services on a negotiated basis and must be in an addendum to this contract. D. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES Mileage Reproductions Courier Service E. PAYMENT TO THE CONSULTANT Payment for services shall be made by the City to the Consultant for completed work on a monthly basis. Such payment shall be the full compensation for work performed, services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. All billings for compensation for work performed under this agreement will list actual time and dates during which work was performed, the title of the Consultant employees doing the work and the compensation shall be figured using the standard hourly rates submitted by the Consultant. CEDAR RIVER GREENWAY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1 of 4 Design Consultant Agreement KIAORCIP011 RICedar River GreenwaylCedar Rv Greenway-Design Consultant Agrmt.doc (mb) Design Consultant Agreement Total payment for this work as listed under Basic Services shall not exceed $84,190.00 (Eighty Four Thousand One Hundred Ninety Dollars and no cents), without a written addendum to this contract, agreed to and signed by both parties. F. TIME OF COMPLETION All design drawings and related documents shall be completed no later than 250 calendar days after approval of this agreement. Remaining services shall be completed in a timely manner consistent with the construction schedule. G. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. The Consultant shall submit a Standard Accord Certification Form (Exhibit 6), prior to the execution of the contract. The minimum insurance requirements for agreements and contract service providers are set forth in Exhibit 3. 2. The Consultant shall provide the City with a 45-day notice of cancellation or non -renewal of insurance. H. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement may be terminated by either.party upon ten (10) days written notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of the other, subject to the non -performing party curing any failure to perform within said ten (10) days. Should failure to perform be cured within ten (10) days, then this contract shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be paid for services performed up to the termination date and accepted by the City. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant shall become the City's property, and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work completed on such documents and other materials. I. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS The City and the Consultant each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of the Agreement. J. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL STATE AND LOCAL LAWS Except to the extent permitted by a bonafide occupational qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows: CEDAR RIVER GREENWAY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2 of 4 Design Consultant Agreement K: ApdRCIPMMI RICedar River GreenwaylCedar Rv GreenwayDesign Consultant Agrmt.doc Design Consultant Agreement The Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, physical, sensory or mental handicaps or marital status. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training. The Consultant will, in all solicitations for employees job orders placed with any employment agency or other firm or agency, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard for race, creed, color national origin, sex, age, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital status. The words "equal opportunity employer" in advertisements shall constitute compliance with this paragraph. The Consultant will include the provisions of the foregoing paragraphs in every subcontract or purchase order for the goods or services which are subject matter of this contract. In the event of non-compliance by the Consultant with any of the non- discrimination provisions of the contract, the Owner shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the contract in whole or in part. If the contract is canceled after part performance, the City shall be obligated to pay the fair market value or the contract price, whichever is lower, for goods or services which have been received and accepted. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws and workman's compensation. The City requires all businesses and individuals doing business in Renton to have and maintain a current City of Renton business license. (For information contact licensing at 425-430-6851.) K. ARBITRATION Arbitration of all questions of dispute under this Agreement shall be at the choice of either party and shall be in accordance with the provisions, then obtaining, of the laws of the State of Washington. The results of arbitration shall be binding on both parties. Choice of Arbitrator shall be as follows: each party to choose one with the third choice by mutual agreement or, if unable to agree, chosen by a Superior Court Judge. Rules of arbitration: American Arbitration Association. CEDAR RIVER GREENWAY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 3 of 4 Design Consultant Agreement H:%priRCIP0iII RlCedar River Greenway\Cedar Rv Greenway-Design Consultant Agrmtdoc Design Consultant Agreement L. HOLD HARMLESS The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City, its officers, employees, agents and representative harmless from any and all claims, demands and actions based upon or arising out of alleged errors, omissions or acts of negligence of the Consultant or its associates, employees, sub -consultants or other agents while performing service under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the Consultant's general liability insurance policies defend, or shall be endorsed to defend the City from claims of bodily injury and or property damage, including claims from third parties, arising out of any alleged acts of negligence of the Consultant or its associates, employees, sub -contractors or other agents while performing services under this Agreement. CONSULTANT CITY OF RENTON Signature Signature Printed Name and Title Business Name Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Printed Name and Title Attest Mailing Address Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk Printed Name and Title city State Zip Telephone CEDAR RIVER GREENWAY MASTER PLAN UPDATE 4 of 4 Design Consultant Agreement H:1ApdRCIP\Bill R\Cedar River GreenwaylCedar Rv Greenway-Design Consultant Agrmt.doc Exhibit A JGM Landscape Architects Scope of Services Tri-Park Master Plan (Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the NARCO Property) With an Update to the Cedar River Greenway Master Plan September 23, 2005 1. Project Management — Manage Team resources, schedule and coordinate with Owner's representatives; provide quality control and assurance; and prepare monthly progress reports. 2. Data Research/Field Reconnaissance/Mapping/Site Analysis Data Research — Gather and review existing conditions information utilizing the Owner's GIS data base. Review on -going I-405 modifications as proposed (and provided) by the Owner, WSDOT and/or their consultant team. Review proposed widening modifications for SR169 (Maple Valley Highway) that are to be implemented this year. Inventoryand document environmental regulations that would influence planning decisions in the Cedar River Corridor. Deliverables: A preliminary site analysis map documenting constraints and opportunities.* Field Reconnaissance — Visit the corridor to inventory the existing parks, trails, facilities and park lands. Prepare a photographic inventory of site conditions. Review conditions and share impressions with Owner's representatives in the field. Deliverables: Photographic inventory.* Mapping — Prepare "free -hand" base maps for Liberty Park, Cedar River Park/NARCO Site and the overall Cedar River Greenway Corridor. The maps will be based on Owner - provided GIS maps. Present at appropriate scale(s). Deliverables: Site base maps.* Site Analysis — Map site inventory findings and prepare a site analysis map that depicts the corridor's constraints and opportunities. Factors influencing the site analysis include sensitive areas (as described by ordinances), transportation and existing facilities. Deliverables: Site analysis mapping and a list of assumptions related to future proposed I-405/WSDOT improvements.* EXHIBIT A - ]GM Landscape Architects/Scope of Services Page 1 of 4 Tri-Park Master Plan w/Update to Cedar River Greenway Master Plan - Rv. 11 /29/05 1:X2005 Files\2005-149mb (JGM REV21b Exhibit A Cedar River) .doc 3. Staff Meeting #1— Prepare for, attend and participate in a meeting with the Owner's department leaders to outline the purpose and intent of the Greenway Master Plan Update. Present photo images of the corridor, the site analysis and review the findings of the WSDOT/City of Renton I-405 Charette. Each department would be invited to identify their needs, concerns, hopes and fears related to the I-405 Project and to the Greenway Master Plan Update. Discuss methods of involving the community in the master planning process and formulate a Draft Vision Statement. Deliverables: Minutes from the meeting, questionnaire and Draft Vision Statement. 4. Community Workshop #1 — Prepare for and conduct a workshop to present: • A list of assumptions related to the future envisioned improvements of the I-405 Project • Draft Vision Statement • Site analysis • Invite the community attendees to share their ideas, needs and/or concerns utilizing small group discussions and questionnaires. The workshop information and questionnaires could also be posted on the Owner's website for broader community input. Following the workshop, JGM will tabulate the responses. Note: No alternatives will be presented at this workshop including the I-405 Charette findings. Deliverables: Workshop presentation, meeting agenda, questionnaires and a tabulation of responses. 5. Meeting with Parks Staff — Review community input from workshop with Owner representatives. Deliverables: Minutes from the meeting. 6. Park Board Meeting #1 — Present an overview of the planning process to date to the Park Board for their review and comment. Include the following: • A list of assumptions related to the future envisioned improvements of the I-405 Project • Review Vision Statement • Site analysis • Invite Park Board to share their ideas, needs and/or concerns. Deliverables: Minutes from the meeting. 7. Preparation of Preliminary Plan Alternatives — Prepare 2 or 3 master plan alternatives for Liberty Park, Cedar River Park, and the NARCO site. The basis for all of the plan alternatives will be the site analysis, the I-405 Project, assumptions, Owner input, community input, and Park Board input. EXHIBIT A - JGM Landscape Architects/Scope of Services Page 2 of 4 Tri-Park Master Plan w/Update to Cedar River Greenway Master Plan - Rv. 11/29/05 1:%2005 Fles\2005-149mb (JGM REV21b Exhibit A Cedar River) .doc Deliverables: 2-3 Preliminary Plan Alternatives for Liberty and Cedar River Parks, the NARCO site and the overall Greenway Plan.* 8. Meeting with Parks Staff — Review Preliminary Plan Alternatives prior to Council Briefing. Deliverables: Minutes from the meeting. 9. Council Briefing #1 — Review information received from Community Workshop #1, tabulated questionnaire results and Park Board meeting #1 for development of Preliminary Plan Alternatives. Present 2-3 Preliminary Plan Alternatives and solicit input. Incorporate comments to plans. Deliverables: Revised Preliminary Plan Alternatives. 10. Community Open House #1 — Prepare for and host a community open house to review materials presented at the first workshop and tabulated questionnaire, and present the Revised Preliminary Plan Alternatives. Gather community responses to the various alternatives. Deliverables: Presentation graphics, agenda, questionnaire and response tabulations and Open House Summary. 11. Park Board Meeting #2 — Present the Revised Preliminary Plan Alternatives and the community workshop responses to the various alternatives. Solicit Park Board input. Deliverables: Minutes from the meeting. 12. Meeting with Parks Staff — Review community input from Community Open House #1 and Park Board Meeting #2 in preparation for City Council Briefing. Incorporate input to develop a Preliminary Preferred Alternative. Deliverables: Preliminary Preferred Alternative. 13. Council Briefing #2 — Prepare for and assist Park's staff with presentation to the City Council. Presentation would include a comprehensive update of the process, Preliminary Plan Alternatives, community and Park Board input received to date and presentation of the Preliminary Preferred Plan. Solicit input on the Preferred Alternative Plan. Deliverables: Notes from briefing. Preferred Plan. 14. Refined Preliminary Preferred Plan — Refine the Preliminary Preferred Plan and incorporate City Council input. Prepare rough order -of -magnitude cost estimates. Review with Park staff. EXHIBIT A -1GM Landscape Architects/Scope of Services Page 3 of 4 Tri-Park Master Plan w/Update to Cedar River Greenway Master Plan - Rv. 1 I/29/05 1:\2005 Files\2005-149mb (JGM REV21b Exhibit A Cedar River) Am Deliverables: Refined Preliminary Preferred Plan * and Preliminary Cost Estimates. 15. Community Open House #2 — Prepare for and conduct a Community Open House to present the Preliminary Preferred Plan. Record comments about the Preliminary Preferred Plan. Deliverables: Minutes from the Open House. 16. Park Board Meeting #3 — Meet with the Park Board and Owner's representatives to present the Preliminary Preferred Plan and rough order of magnitude cost estimates. Present comments about the Preliminary Preferred Plan from the Community Open House. Solicit input. Deliverables: Park Board Meeting minutes. 17. Draft Master Plan Graphics and Report — Prepare the Draft Master Plan Graphics and Report detailing the planning process including documentation of community workshop, and open houses, park board meetings and council briefings and a written Executive Summary of the planning process.* Review with Owner's staff. Deliverables: Draft Master Plan Graphics and Report — a camera-ready copy will be forwarded to the Owner. A rendered illustrative Master Plan similar in format, quality and character to the 1993 Greenway Master Plan, an updated cost estimate and rendered illustrative sketches.* 18. City Council Presentation — Prepare for, attend and present the Draft Cedar River Greenway Master Plan Update to the City Council for adoption. Assist the Owner's staff in addressing the Council's questions. Deliverables: Draft Master Plan Report. Draft Master Plan Graphics. 19. Master Plan Report — Prepare and submit the final Master Plan Report and Graphics incorporating Council comments. Deliverables: Camera-ready master plan report and graphics. End of Scope of Services *Digital images will be forwarded to the Owner for review and comment and for posting on the Owner's website. EXHIBIT A - JGM Landscape Architects/Scope of Services Page 4 of 4 Tri-Park Master Plan w/Update to Cedar River Greenway Master Plan - Rv. 11/29/05 1:12005 FlIes12005-149mb (JGM REV21b Exhibit A Cedar River) .doc Exhibit B Fee Proposal Cedar River Greenway Master Plan Update September 23, 2005 JGM Landscape Architects Task Estimated Hours: Principal Proj. Land. Drafter Clerical Arch. 1. Project Management 24 24 2. Data Research/Field Recon/Mapping 44 92 36 3. Staff Meeting # 1 4 4 4 4. Community Workshop #1 16 16 8 5. Meeting With Parks Staff#1 4 4 6. Park Board Meeting # 1 4 4 7. Preliminary Plan Alternatives 72 72 24 8. Meeting With Parks Staff#2 4 4 9. City Council Briefing #1 8 4 10. City Council Presentation #1 8 8 11. Park Board Meeting #2 4 4 12. Meeting With Parks Staff#3 4 4 2 13. City Council Briefing #2 8 4 14. Refine Preliminary Preferred Alternative 72 88 24 2 15. Community Open House #2 8 8 4 16. Park Board Meeting #3 4 4 17. Draft Master Plan Graphics and Report 56 80 24 12 18. City Council Presentation 8 4 19. Master Plan Report 6 2 8 Hours Subtotal 360 410 124 50 x Hourly Rate $114.00 $75.00 $75.00 $62.00 Individual Subtotals $41,040.00 $30,750.00 $9,300.00 $3,100.00 Estimated Fee Subtotal $84,190.00 Total does not include reimbursable expenses. H:\April\CIP\Bill R\Cedar River Greenway\Cedar Rv Greenway-JGM REV Exhibit B fee 9-23-05.xis CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: s Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface December 5, 2005 Water Utility Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Agenda Status Consent .............. Subject: Public Hearing.. 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Correspondence.. Noncompetitive Grants Ordinance ............. Resolution ............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Resolution Information......... Agreement for Award of Noncompetitive Grants VA Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other. X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... $59,953.85 (requested fund allocation for 2002-2005) Total Project Budget... City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The King Conservation District (KCD) agreement allows the transfer of the City of Renton's $1.00 per parcel share of the $5.00 per parcel KCD Assessment of parcels within Renton. The grant funding can be used on projects that are approved by KCD such as water quality, habitat enhancement, water and fisheries resource protection projects and programs. The current estimated balance of the grant funding available to the City from 2002 through 2005 is approximately $65,936.00. This includes the yearly -accrued assessment from prior years (2002-2004) of $49,178.20 plus the estimated 2005 allocation of $16,757.80. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of the total 2002-2005 estimated assessment to fund the following projects: (1) The City sponsored SW 34`h Street Culvert Replacement Project, and (2) the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005, and approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. CADocuments and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\AgenBill-grant funds.doc\AQIp Y PLANNINGBUILDING/ E- , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT &11*vo� M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 5, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the City Council VIA: )L 'O,)Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerma>-6Fdministrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor Allen Quynn, Surface Water Engineer SUBJECT: 2002-2005 King Conservation District Agreement for Noncompetitive Grants ISSUE: Should the Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to (1) execute an agreement with the King Conservation District (KCD) to accept the City of Renton annual share of the approved King Conservation District assessment, and (2) approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance? RECOMMENDATION: The Planning/Building/Public Works Department staff recommends that Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton's share of the King Conservation District fund allocation from 2002 to 2005. In addition, staff also requests that the Council approve using a portion ($4,869) of Renton's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The City of Renton became a member of the King Conservation District in March 1992, upon the passage of Resolution No. 2885. At that time, the King County Council approved a $1.25 per parcel assessment against all properties within jurisdictions that are members of the King Conservation District on August 16, 1993. Subsequently, King County Ordinance 12959, approved by the King County Council in December 1997, adopted the Regional Water Quality Committee's recommendation to raise the Conservation District annual assessment from $1.25 per parcel to $5.00 per parcel. The $1.25 per parcel assessment had been in place since the King County Council adopted Ordinance 10981 in Terri Briere December 5, 2005 Page 2 of 2 August 1993 and was renewed in 1995 by Ordinance 12095. The ordinances provide that the generated revenues be distributed as follows: • $3.00 distributed equally to each of the five watershed forums • $1.00 per parcel to the County and each city in the District from which the funds were collected • $1.00 per parcel to the District for implementation of its approved work program. The District will either spend the funds in cities by providing services, or will transfer the funding to the cities to be used as financial assistance for stream restoration, fish habitat, and/or water quality projects. Based on the assessment collected in 2004 by the King Conservation District, the annual share available to Renton is approximately $16,393 per year. The grant funds could be used to pay the District for specific additional services or could be transferred to the City for use on eligible projects. The agreement for 2005 will allow the City to receive $59,953.85 of a total KCD assessment from 2002 through 2005 estimated at $65,936. The amount of the agreement does not match the total estimated assessment due to the fact that the agreement amount is based on the approved grant application submitted in July of this year. The amount requested in the application was based on the estimated 2005 assessment at the time the application was prepared. Since that time, the estimated 2005 assessment has been revised by KCD to include an additional $6,000.15. Although the balance of $6,000.15 cannot be used under the 2005 agreement, it will be available for the City to use for future projects covered under a separate grant application and subsequent agreement. The KCD assessment will be used to fund the City sponsored SW 30 Street Drainage Improvement Project ($55,084.85) and the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance ($4,869). Both of these projects will help to restore fish habitat as well as improve water quality in the Springbrook Creek Basin. Attached, is a brief description of projects that are being requested for funding by the District for this year. Also attached, is a copy of an agreement to allow the transfer of funds from the King Conservation District to the City along with a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement. CONCLUSION: Council approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement with the King Conservation District to accept the City of Renton share of the approved King Conservation District assessment and approve the use of a portion of the City's assessment for the Black River Channel Restoration Project sponsored by the Black River Watershed Alliance. CADocuments and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\Issue Paper.docAQlp CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION 11 The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for the award of a non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk 1 RESOLiTTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES:1145:11/23/05:ma rKCD t Name: SW 34' Street Culvert ement Project ant: City of Renton _ pal Partners (itany): — Renton rotect Cost: S900,000 estimatedundin Re nested: $55,084.85 Start Date: Aril 2005 End Date: Fall 2007__ 1. Brief Project Description (--- 200 words): Contact: Allen Quynn — Title: Project Manager!` v Address: 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 425-430-7247 Fax: 425-430_-7247 E-mail: a u nn c�.renton.wa.us The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing of SW 34" Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP) culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River (see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 34'" Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels, which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34"' Street. • Upsizing the SW 34'h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee (bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, -here appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing, timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers, the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34'h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34'h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d (111) Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives, lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding, preserving and restoring fish habitat, protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP), which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 34`h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria, the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 34'h Street during the I00-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In -stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9. The draft WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. HAFile Sys1SWA -Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I- Interagency CooperationMing Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grmts11003 City CorrespondencelCity KCD grant application.doclAQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Rgional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(11), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months_ Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34`" Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better -lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 30 Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 1 I- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District12002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application_doc\AQtp 4 King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or "BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above -described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles, websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments • iU FAVA VIN i Mp• . • � Q Date HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\ 1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application_doc4AQtp King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez estoration Project nt: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Fiscal Agent: Duwamish Tribe rFriends al Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 135`h St. enton Renton, WA 98059 of Black River Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelion@yahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description (-- 200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase 1 and Phase 2, and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29, 2004, and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase 1 is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to, the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately Y2 acre in size. As in Phase 1, the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\.SWA - Surface Water section AdministrationlSWA l a- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District12002-2005 KCD Grants11003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. • Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee (bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects — Intent. The legislature .declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and, in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria "to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and, in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition, the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD, (Large Woody Debris), which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area, with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife, producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in, the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria "to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1, there were four community events: one day for planting, two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system. Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls, Herons Forever members, Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members, Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other HAFile Sys1SWA - Surface Water Section Adminisuation\SWA l l- Interagency CooperationTing Conservation Dis►rict\2002-2005 KCD GrantsU 003 City Correspondence0oris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low -maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1, the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area, as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely, Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present, which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase I, community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger, they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting_ The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion, reduce storm - water run-off by absorbing water through their roots, clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees, with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase 1 was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future, will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional Funding Princ_ples As stated in the # 3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv), "Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring (data collection, studies, evaluation) and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently, there are two Renton schools, Lindbergh High School and Black River High School, which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest, Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\S WA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\ 1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 4 The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above, the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: 1. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60% ground cover on the riverbank and a 35% ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island, and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were I I ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work, the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe, to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions, pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field, 20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results, the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation, and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2% mortality rate, and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site, especially in the field area, since the soil is very well -drained and does not retain water. A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March, but once the drip irrigation system was running, the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys1SWA - Surface Water Section AdministrationlSWA 11- Interagency CooperationWing Conservation Districtl2002-2005 KCD GrantsU 003 City Correspondenee\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 5 and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support, evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members, are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation, the growth of the invasive weeds, checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking, or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: 1. Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set, vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting, mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year, to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90% of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation. The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each. Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources. Native trees will also control erosion, storm -water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil, control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids, will be added as necessary. H:Tile Sys1SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 6 8. Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants, the drip irrigation system, the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds King County Waterworks Grant Other Funds (specify) Total Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional Services $15,138 $15,138 Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 1 190 Other (Fiscal Agents) $4,684 1 $4,684 TOTAL $4,869 IS48,690 J$53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. f Z Date H:\FileSys\SWA -Surface Water Section Administration\SWA It- Interagency CooperationWing Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application1doc RENTON RS G IS SHOPPING 11 :CENTER M RIS AV S 1114 OR RD. S AV 41g6 ROLLING HILLS CREEK SHA I TLICK WAS TAt T V�LLEY PANTHER J CREEK GENERAL IsAN \k HOSP17AL Y 36*x48' BOX 60. SR-1.67 36' I VALLEY RD Cr it nil !it 4r EL AV S r Lv AV Ji .......... D;f: Replacement Project :5i. z SCALE I'=ioW '_T14OWAS AV SW 0 POMfLL AV SW CONNECTING CHANNEL PMECT T 1.21i fl (CCIMPLETED 60. 1995) ' oAKESDAIf AV SWSW' ow VAILILEY AREA 36* LEGEND I i i 36' ( In STUDY AREA 36* DIAMETER STORM DRAIN STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL :R CULVERT(S) a4CKSON SIN PUMP STATION FLOOD WATER MILL STORAGE POND OR CITY LIMITS TU I CREEK —ITS RR ----- ---- - J EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER RR WATERSHED PROJECT BLACK EST VALLFi H FIGURE 6-2 PUMP W RIVER STATION RENTON VALLEY AREA EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO VEGRR EEN—C RI kUWAMISH rams Block River Pump Stoti s Black River Water Quality Management Plan Study Area -, Renton 'Valley gbrook Tukwila King County LKing Count Renton, T� �k w��o i I i i APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET Springbrook Creek ether Lake Garrison Creekr, / Road IF _N N I Kent Lagoons East Side (:,en River Watershed 6undary I i L King County Kent 81 Kent EAST SIDE GREEN RIVER WATERSHED PROJECT FIGURE 6-1 PROJECT AREA AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT Black River Watershed Alliance This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the Black River Watershed Alliance, a non-profit organization in King County, Washington, located at 16444 SE 135 h Street, Renton Washington 98059 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things, provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Four thousand eight -hundred sixty-nine Dollars ($4,869) from 2002 Assessments. Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Grant funds from 2002 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five (5) business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the -1- Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty (30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures. are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington ("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. -2- 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. SIE DISTRICT: By Name Title Date Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: Byc - 1� Name f c- C . f ,,m odt Date I.S M4i-9i-M-1; By Name Title Date Approved as to Form: RECIPIENT'S ATTORNEY: sy Name Date ME �IM King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 1 Project Name: Black River Channel Native Contact: Doris Yepez Plant Restoration Project Applicant: Doris Yepez Title: Project Coordinator Phase 1 Fiscal Agent: Seattle Audubon Society Phase 2 Fiscal Agent: Principal Partners (if any): Address: 16444 SE 135`h St. City of Renton Renton, WA 98059 Friends of Black River Herons Forever Duwamish Tribe Total Project Cost: $53,559.00 Phone: 425 891-0730 KCD Funding Requested: $4,869.00 Fax: 425 917-0872 Project Start Date: 9/29/2004 E-mail: dorisdandelionpyahoo.com Project End Date: Spring 2008 1. Brief Project Description (— 200 words): There are two phases to the Black River Channel Restoration Project, Phase 1 and Phase 2, and the funding requested covers both Phases. The goals for both Phases are to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, and develop community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. Phase 1 began September 29, 2004, and concludes in Spring 2007 with a commitment to maintain and monitor the restoration site for two years. The restoration area for Phase 1 is .83 of an acre in size and located on the south bank of the Black River Channel, off of Monster Road SW, adjacent and immediately downstream from the DNRP Black River Pump Station and upstream from the Monster Road Bridge. Much of the work has been completed to date and included: 1. The removal of invasive plants on the top 20 ft. of the riverbank and in the adjoining field. 2. The removal of 11 ecology blocks left on the property. 3. Scarification of the soil to loosen the gravelly soil on half of the field area. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger. 5. Soil amendments. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs. 7. Installation of a drip irrigation system to increase the survival rate of the newly planted native vegetation. What remains is the monitoring and maintenance of the restoration site for the two year committed period. Phase 2 will begin in Fall 2005 and will conclude Spring 2008. Phase 2 is on the south bank as well, but immediately upstream from, and adjacent to, the DNRP Black River Pump Station. The restoration area is approximately'/2 acre in size. As in Phase 1, the goal is to restore riparian habitat along the Black River in Renton, Washington, as well as expand community stewardship of the Black River and the environment. The new site will also be monitored and maintained for two years. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11- Interagency CooperationWing Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 2 The project objectives are: • Provide shade, food sources and habitat improvements for the fish and wildlife through the removal of invasive weeds and the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs. • Acquaint the community and students with the Black River. • Educate the community and students about the Black River Channel Restoration Project and the Black River watershed, forest and channel ecosystem. Involve the community and students in the restoration work. The following provides a brief description of specifically how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee (bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.450: "Watershed restoration projects — Intent. The legislature declares that it is the goal of the state of Washington to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and, in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat. It is further the policy of the state insofar as possible to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals." Description of how this project meets the first part of the criteria "to preserve and restore the natural resources of the state and, in particular, fish and wildlife and their habitat": This project restores the riparian habitat along the Black River Channel and adjoining field, and improves the fish and wildlife habitat. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs restores the area to its more natural state. In addition, the native trees planted along the riverbank will provide shade that will keep the temperatures of the water at a more desirable level for salmonids. The debris from the trees and shrubs, leaves falling, will also provide a source of food for the fish; and fallen trees will act as LWD, (Large Woody Debris), which give salmon areas to rest and spawn. The field area, with the planting of native trees, shrubs and forbs, will provide a buffer from the noise and pollution of the street, as well as provide a diversity of food sources for the other wildlife, producing berries and flowers at different times of year. Also, once grown in, the vegetation will provide more habitat areas for the wildlife. Description of how this project meets the second part of the criteria "to utilize the volunteer organizations who have demonstrated their commitment to these goals": During Phase 1, there were four community events: one day for planting, two others for mulching and weeding, and the last was the installation of the drip irrigation system. Numerous groups helped with these tasks including Renton Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls, Herons Forever members, Friends of Black River, Duwamish tribal members, Sierra Club members, Boeing volunteers and the Briarwood Student Leadership Group. The same volunteer organizations will be asked to help with Phase 2 in order to increase the groups' sense of connection and commitment to the Black River and to give them the opportunity to see the growth and progress made through their participation in the restoration tasks during Phase 1. KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria As stated in the KCD Strategic Plan Initiative Criteria, Section b ii): "Promoting Natural Habitat Restoration. The District will provide information and assistance to landowners, businesses, and other HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application citizens in rural and urban areas on the preservation and restoration of natural habitats including the creation of low -maintenance native plant habitats that conserve water and are friendly to wildlife, eco- 'landscaping, establishing naturescaping demonstration sites, intrusive species management and community stewardship". Description of how this project meets this criteria: The restoration work included, in Phase 1, the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field area, as well as the removal of other invasive shrubs such as the Butterfly bush. Maintenance of the restoration site includes weeding, specifically focusing on removing the new growth of Himalayan blackberries and Butterfly bush, and removing other weeds on the site that are on the Washington State and/or King County Noxious Weed List, namely, Tansy ragwort, Bull thistle and Oxeye daisy. Other invasive weeds will be removed as needed. Phase 2 also calls for the removal of Himalayan blackberries on the riverbank and in the field areas, and the removal of other noxious weeds present, which include Japanese knotweed. During Phase 1, community stewardship has been developed through the involvement of the different volunteer organizations in the restoration tasks and in the presentation of the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to four different groups. As stated in the KCD Strategic Initiative Section d, i): "Population Growth and Increased Urbanization. The District will actively promote workable solutions that help minimize the effects of population growth and increased urbanization on the natural environment." Description of how this project meets these criteria: When the planted native trees get larger, they will create a dense wooded area, a small forest, in a highly urbanized setting. The planting of trees in urban areas is very beneficial to the environment. Trees absorb contaminants, control erosion, reduce storm - water run-off by absorbing water through their roots, clean the air, and as stated above, are beneficial to the fish and wildlife by providing more shade, additional food sources and habitat. The trees, with the falling of large wooded debris, also enhance our stream systems. The grassy, field area that was part of the restoration site in Phase 1 was under laid with gravel to accommodate the trucks when the Black River Pump Station was built. One, of the restoration tasks, during Phase 1, included ripping up the gravelly field and planting native trees, shrubs and forbs. Mulch was also added throughout the field area. The addition of mulch, and the decomposition of native vegetation in the future, will enrich the soil and help rebuild it. KCD Regional Funding Principles As stated in the # 3 KCD Regional Funding Principles, iv), "Water quality and watershed restoration and protection support services such as coordination of monitoring (data collection, studies, evaluation) and public education programs". Description of how this project meets this criterion: During Phase 2, community involvement will expand to include the Renton schools and other local schools. Presently, there are two Renton schools, Lindbergh High School and Black River High School, which have provided written commitments to involve their students in hands-on learning at the Black River, as well as introducing a Black River component into their science curriculum. The Black River Riparian Forest, Channel and restoration areas will be used as a living laboratory for students to learn about scientific methods and concepts and to learn about the Black River and its components. HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 4 The Black River Restoration Project will also be included as an option in a tour sponsored by the King County Waste Treatment program, Wheels to Water. A visit to the South Treatment Plant will include a tour of the Black River and the opportunity to participate in restoration tasks or learn about the history and components of the Black River through a walking tour of the Forest, Channel and restoration sites. In addition to the above, the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation shown to different groups during Phase 1, helped educate the public about the restoration work and the Black River. The PowerPoint presentations will also be shown to new groups participating in Phase 2. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Phase 1: 1. Removal of invasive weeds: Himalayan blackberries were rampant on the riverbank and on a small vegetation island in the middle of the field. There were a few other invasives such as the Butterfly bush, but the Himalayan blackberry was the predominant invasive weed with a 50- 60% ground cover on the riverbank and a 35% ground cover on the island. Most of the invasive blackberries on the restoration site have been eradicated through the cutting and grubbing of the blackberries. Earthcorps was hired to cut and grub the blackberries on the top 20 ft. of the bank. Volunteers and salaried crew have removed the remainder of the blackberries on the island, and have been tackling the new growth of the Himalayan blackberry that is popping up throughout the site. A salaried person has also been cutting blackberries on the lower part of the bank, beyond the 20 ft., and throughout the site. 2. Removal of ecology blocks: There were 11 ecology blocks on the site before the project began. These have all been removed with the help of King County roads crew. 3. Ripping up of the gravelly field: Before the restoration work, the entire field area was grown over with grass and under laid with gravel that was deposited when the Black River Pump Station was built. It was almost impossible to dig into the field to plant native vegetation since the ground was so compacted. Half of the gravelly field was ripped up with the use of a backhoe, to allow for planting, and now the soil is looser. Thrushes were observed, on at least two different occasions, pecking at the soil since it has been loosened. The backhoe also removed the other invasive shrubs that were in the island. 4. Digging planting holes with an auger: In the other half of the gravelly field, 20 rows of planting holes were dug with an auger. The field area is being used as a test site to see which side produces better results, the augured field area or the area where the backhoe ripped up the gravel and grass. 5. Soil amendments: Approximately 60 cubic yards of mulch was spread throughout the field area of the restoration site beginning January 2005 through May 2005. The mulch helps with weed control; helps keep some moisture close to the newly planted native vegetation, and will enhance the soil as it decays. The soil in the field area is nutrient poor, and some plants are in need of fertilizer. Biosolids are in the process of being purchased from the South Waste Treatment Plant to place around the plants that need some fertilizing. 6. The planting of 613 native trees, shrubs and forbs: Most of the native plants were planted in January 2005. Some were planted in February 2005, and approximately 10 more were donated and planted in May 2005. There has been less than a 2% mortality rate, and those were mostly the Pacific madrones, which have the reputation of being difficult to plant. 7. Installation of the drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system was installed in April 2005. A drip system is crucial at this site, especially in the field area, since the soil is very well -drained and does not retain water. A few of the native plants had yellowed a little with the early heat spell in February/March, but once the drip irrigation system was running, the plants regained their healthy, green look. The drip irrigation system is attached to the faucet at the Pump Station HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I1- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\I003 City Correspondence\DoriS grant application3.doc King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 5 and is turned on at least 4 times a week by the Pump Station crew, and occasionally on hot and dry weekends, by the restoration project coordinator. 8. Community involvement: The community has shown interest and support, evidenced with the large numbers of participants. For two of the community activity days, there were over 50 volunteers helping on each of those days. 9. Monitoring and maintenance: The project is being monitored and maintained at least twice a month. Partners to the grant, Herons Forever and Friends of Black River members, are helping with the maintenance and monitoring. Monitoring includes tracking the condition of the native vegetation, the growth of the invasive weeds, checking the drip irrigation system and noting any wildlife in the area. Maintenance includes protecting the native vegetation from being eaten, if necessary; removing the invasive weeds by either weed whacking, or manually cutting then grubbing, as in the case of the blackberries; replacing dead native vegetation and repairing, if necessary, the drip irrigation system. Monitoring and maintenance is very important in helping the native plants thrive as well as ensuring that they will not be out competed by the invasive weeds or eaten by wildlife. The project activities and measurable results for Phase 2 include: L Planning and organizing: A Scope of Work Budget for King County needs to be completed before December 2005. Dates for the different restoration tasks need to be set, vendors need to be contacted, materials need to be purchased, subcontractors need to be lined up, requests for payments and other paperwork need to be submitted to King County throughout the project. Other grant paperwork needs to be completed including a report to KCD. Reports are submitted to partners on a regular basis. Media will be solicited for the various community events. Planning and organizing is critical for the project to run smoothly and to get the needed tasks done. 2. Contacting different volunteer organizations: Different volunteer organizations will be contacted to help with the native planting, mulching and installation of the drip irrigation system. Involving the community will develop community stewardship of the Black River. We will attempt to involve the same organizations as last year, to strengthen community stewardship, and contact new groups as well. The new groups will be shown the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation to acquaint them with the Black River and to build some desire and enthusiasm to help with the restoration tasks. 3. Contacting Lindbergh and Black River High Schools to set up dates for student participation in the restoration project and discuss the specifics of the addition of the Black River into the science curriculum. 4. Developing a tour schedule with the Wheels to Water Program and writing up an oral presentation for the tour. 5. Removing invasive weeds: The invasive weeds account for at least 90% of the present groundcover, and most of the weeds are Himalayan blackberry. The weeds need to be removed in order to plant native vegetation. The roots of the weeds will be removed to inhibit the return growth of the weeds. The abundant Himalayan blackberries create a monoculture with a food source that has limited value since it is not eaten by much of the wildlife. 6. Planting native trees, shrubs and forbs: Approximately 500 trees, shrubs and forbs will be planted with numerous species of each. Native vegetation will enhance the area by providing food sources, shade and habitat for the wildlife; and a diversity of native vegetation will provide a variety of food and habitat sources. Native trees will also control erosion, storm -water run-off, clean the air and absorb contaminants in the soil. 7. Soil amendments: Mulch will be added around the areas where the native vegetation is planted. Mulch will help retain the moisture in the soil, control weeds as well as enrich the soil as it decays. A natural fertilizer, such as biosolids, will be added as necessary. HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application 6 8. .Installing a drip irrigation system: The drip irrigation system will keep the native vegetation hydrated and increase their chance of survival. Watering is critical especially during the area's dry summer months. 9. Maintenance and monitoring of the restoration site: Monitoring includes checking and recording the condition of the native plants, the drip irrigation system, the growth of the invasive weeds and wildlife activity. Maintenance involves repairing the drip irrigation system, removing the growing weeds, replacing dead native plants and protecting the native plants from being eaten by wildlife. Frequent maintenance and monitoring will help keep the invasive growth from getting out of control and help insure the successful growth of the native vegetation as well as catch any other problems that come up. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds King County Waterworks Grant Other Funds (specify) Total Salaries and Benefits $1,034 $14,000 $15,034 Travel/Meals/Mileage $253 $2,043 $2,296 Office/Field Supplies $3,489 $12,728 $16,217 Contracted/Professional Services $15,138 $15.,138 Land Acquisition Permits $93 97 190 Other (Fiscal Agents) $4,684 $4,684 TOTAL 1$4,869 IS48,690 1 1 $53,559 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. The KCD contribution will be noted on the signs that will be placed at the two restoration sites upon the termination of the project. King County has been advised that KCD funds will potentially be the source of the cash match for the project for both phases. Any newspaper articles or photos will acknowledge KCD as a contributor to the project. KCD will be acknowledged as a contributor and partner in the Black River Channel Restoration Project PowerPoint presentation. KCD will also be mentioned and acknowledged in other correspondence related to the project. NO" %�% ��i wt f'i • 12- C, �/;o Date HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\,SWA I I- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\Doris grant application3.doc C v�x-I ? v AGREEMENT FOR AWARD OF NONCOMPETITIVE GRANT City of Renton This Agreement is made between the King Conservation District Number 9, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 935 Powell Ave. SW, Renton, WA 98055 (referred to herein as "District"), and the City of Renton, a municipal corporation in King County, Washington, located at 1055 South Grady Way, Renton Washington 98055 (referred to herein as "Recipient"), for the purposes set forth herein. SECTION 1. RECITALS 1.1 Whereas, the District is a special purpose district organized and existing under authority of Chapter 89.08 RCW. The District engages in and provides certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and 1.2 Whereas, on December 15, 2000, the Metropolitan King County Council enacted King County Ordinance No. 14016 which, among other things, provides for the distribution of noncompetitive grant funds from a portion of the special assessments imposed by King County Ordinance No. 14016 and collected by the District pursuant to Chapter 89.08 RCW; and 1.3 Whereas, on November 19, 1998, the District adopted Resolution No. 98-20 relating to the policy and procedures governing the District's award of any noncompetitive grants authorized by King County; and 1.4 Whereas, the District has reviewed the grant application submitted by Recipient and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Chapter 89.08 RCW and the District's policy and procedures for awarding noncompetitive grants; and 1.5 Whereas, the District and Recipient desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions relating to the District's award of a noncompetitive grant to Recipient. SECTION 2. AGREEMENT 2.1 The District agrees to award Recipient a grant in the total amount of Fifty-five thousand eighty-four dollars and 85 cents ($55,084.85) ($10,618.51 from 2002 Assessments, $16,271.58 from 2003 Assessments, $16,656.05 from 2004 Assessments, and $11,538.71 from 2005 Assessments). Grant funds shall be used by Recipient solely for the performance of the work described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The District shall pay the grant funds to Recipient in accordance with the following paragraphs. 2.1.1 Grant funds from 2002, 2003, and 2004 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient within five (5) business days after District's receipt of a fully executed Agreement. -1- 2.1.2 Grant funds from 2005 Assessments shall be paid by District to Recipient on or before January 31, 2005, provided that such funds have been collected and received by the District and thereafter in quarterly installments as funds are received. 2.2 Recipient represents and warrants that it will only use the grant funds for the work described in Exhibit A, which may be amended by the parties pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized work. Further, Recipient agrees to return to the District any grant funds that are not expended and/or remain after completion of the work covered by this Agreement. 2.3 Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the grant funds may only be expended on work which shall be entirely within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. The following municipal entities are not within the District's jurisdictional boundaries: Enumclaw, Federal Way, Milton, Pacific, and Skykomish. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for work performed outside the District's jurisdictional boundaries. 2.4 In the event the scope of work authorized by this Agreement includes the use of grant funds to purchase houses located on real property within a flood hazard area, Recipient acknowledges and agrees that grant funds may only be used for such purposes if the houses to be purchased were constructed before floodplain mapping or sensitive areas regulations were in place for that area. Recipient shall be required to refund to the District that portion of any grant funds which are used for unauthorized purposes. 2.5 Recipient shall be required to provide the District with biannual financial and project progress reports, along with an annual summary report. Financial and project reports shall be due May 31 and November 30 each year. The Recipient shall also be required to submit to the District a final report which documents the Recipient's completion of the work in conformance with this Agreement within thirty (30) days after the completion of the work. The final report shall, among other things, summarize the project's successes and shall address the regional benefits accomplished by the work. The final report shall also identify any obstacles or challenges which were encountered during the work, along with general recommendations regarding ways to avoid such obstacles or challenges in the future. If requested, Recipient agrees to provide the District with additional financial or progress reports from time to time, at reasonable intervals. 2.6 Recipient's expenditures of grant funds shall be separately identified in the Recipient's accounting records. If requested, Recipient shall comply with other reasonable requests made by the District with respect to the manner in which project expenditures are tracked and accounted for in Recipient's accounting books and records. Recipient shall maintain such records of expenditures as may be necessary to conform to generally accepted accounting principals and to meet the requirements of all applicable state and federal laws. -2- 2.7 Recipient shall be required to track project expenses using the Budget Accounting and Reporting System for the State of Washington ("BARS"). 2.8 The District or its representative shall have the right from time to time, at reasonable intervals, to audit the Recipient's books and records in order to verify compliance with the terms of this Agreement. Recipient shall cooperate with the District in any such audit. 2.9 Recipient shall retain all accounting records and project files relating to this Agreement in accordance with criteria established in the Revised Code of Washington and the Washington State Archivist. 2.10 Recipient shall ensure that all work performed by Recipient or its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors is performed in a manner which protects and safeguards the environment and natural resources and which is in compliance with local, state and federal laws and regulations. Recipient shall implement an appropriate monitoring system or program to ensure compliance with this provision. 2.11 Recipient agrees that in the event a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the imposition or collection of the special assessments authorized by King County Ordinance No. 14016 are unlawful and orders the repayment of such assessments, Recipient agrees to reimburse the District for the full amount of the grant award, including any interest which may be awarded by the court. 2.12 Recipient agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, its agents, officers, officials and employees from all claims, alleged liability, damages, losses to or death of person or damage to property allegedly resulting from the acts of the Recipient or any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. 2.13 Recipient agrees to acknowledge the District as a source of funding for this project on all literature, signage or press releases related to said project. SECTION 3. GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.1 This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 3.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No prior or contemporaneous representation, inducement, promise or agreement between or among the parties which relate to the subject matter hereof which are not embodied in this Agreement shall be of any force or effect. 3.3 No amendment to this Agreement shall be binding on any of the parties to this Agreement unless such amendment is in writing and is executed by the parties. The parties MIE contemplate that this Agreement may from time to time be modified by written amendment which shall be executed by duly authorized representatives of the parties and attached to this Agreement. 3.4 Each party warrants and represents that such party has full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and each person executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he/she has been fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that such party is bound by the signature of such representative. 3.5 Expenditure of grant funds shall be subject to appropriation by the Metropolitan King County Council. DISTRICT: RECIPIENT: By By Name Name Title Date Approved as to Form: DISTRICT LEGAL COUNSEL: By l Name C- C ° }- a' , Y}1 T Date (! 2 3 Title Date Approved as to Form: By Name Date -4- Project Name: SW 341' Street Culvert Replacement Project Contact: Allen Quynn Ci of Reton Title: Project Mana er Lhicant: artners (if any): ton Address: 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Total Project Cost: $900,000 estimated Phone: 425-430-7247 KCD Funding Requested: $55,084.85 Fax: 425-430-7247 Project Start Date: April 2005 E-mail: a u nn ci.renton.wa.us Project End Date: Fall 2007 1. Brief Project Description (— 200 words): The purpose of this project is to replace the existing Springbrook Creek culvert crossing 34of SW `h Street in Renton, Washington. The crossing consists of 4 existing, undersized corrugated metal (CMP) culverts that will be replaced with a new box culvert. Springbrook Creek is the main drainage channel for the 24-square mile Black River Basin that includes portions of the Cities of Renton, Kent, Tukwila and unincorporated King County. Springbrook Creek drains to the Black River Pump Station where flows are pumped into the Green River (see attached figures 6-1 and 6-2). The fisheries resources within Springbrook Creek include Chinook and Coho salmon, steelhead and cutthroat trout. The existing culverts were constructed in 1980 and are a major restriction of flows that contribute to the flooding problems in portions of the south valley during storm events. The project consists of the following elements: • Construction of a new box culvert including stream bypass. • Placement of spawning gravel in the bottom of the culvert. • Placement of woody debris on the sides of the channel. • Planting of riparian trees and shrubs along channel bank. 2. Project Objectives (Citing specific paragraphs and subtexts, provide a brief description of how the project meets one RCW 89.08 criteria and one KCD Strategic Plan Initiative criteria outlined in the Policy and Procedure Overview): The project will accomplish the following objectives: • Eliminate flooding of the SW 340' Street/Springbrook Creek crossing during the 100-yr storm event. • Lower upstream water levels, which will increase the capacity of local storm systems in Lind Avenue and SW 34`h Street. • Upsizing the SW 34`h Street culvert in conjunction with future pipe system improvements will help the City meet flood protection goals in the valley. • Provide improved fish passage and riparian habitat for salmonid migration. The following provides a brief description of how the project meets a minimum of one of the activities/purposes established for conservation districts pursuant to RCW 89.08 and a minimum of one of the King Conservation District's Strategic Initiatives and one of the Regional Funding Principles approved by the Regional Water Quality Committee (bolded text indicates the specific wording that this proposal is addressing): RCW 89.08 As stated in RCW 89.08.01: "To prepare and keep current a comprehensive long-range program recommending the conservation of all the renewable natural resources of the District. Such King Conservation District 2 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application programs shall be directed toward the best use of renewable natural resources and in a manner that will best meet the needs of the District and the state, taking into consideration, where appropriate, such uses as farming, grazing, timber supply, forest, parks, outdoor recreation, potable water supplies for urban and rural areas, water for agriculture, minimal flow, and industrial uses, watershed stabilization, control of soil erosion, retardation of water run-off, flood prevention and control, reservoirs and other water storage, restriction of developments of flood plains, protection of open space and scenery, preservation of natural beauty, protection of fish and wildlife, preservation of wilderness areas and wild rivers, the prevention or reduction of sedimentation and other pollution in rivers and other waters, and such location of highways, schools, housing developments, industries, airports and other facilities and structures as will fit the needs of the state and be consistent with the best uses of the renewable natural resources of the state. The program shall include an inventory of all renewable natural resources in the District, a compilation of current resource needs, projections of future resource requirements, priorities for various resource activities, projected timetables, descriptions of available alternatives, and provisions for coordination with other resource programs. Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project meets the above criteria by reducing flooding of SW 34`h Street as well as upstream storm systems that discharge to Springbrook Creek. The new culvert will be designed to prevent flooding of the SW 34`h Street crossing during the 100-yr storm event and lower tail water conditions for outfalls discharging upstream. The project will also help protect fish by lowering stream velocities during storm events through the new culvert to facilitate fish passage. KCD Strategic Plan Initiate: This proposal meets the strategic plan element 2,d (iii) Support for Regional Conservation Initiatives, which states: "The District will join in regional conservation initiatives, lending its leadership and expertise on issues such as major river flooding, preserving and restoring fish habitat, protecting and restoring water quality in watersheds and general public conservation education programs in the region". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is one element of a series of projects recommended in the City of Renton's 1997 East Side Green River Watershed Plan and EIS (ESGRWP), which was a basin wide planning level study to identify projects that would help reduce the flooding in the Renton valley area. The ESGRWP identified the replacement of the SW 34`h Street crossing of Springbrook Creek to reduce upstream water levels and improve fish passage. As discussed under the previous criteria, the proposed project will eliminate flooding of SW 341h Street during the 100-yr storm as well as reduce flooding in local storm systems upstream that discharge to the creek. The project will also improve water quality and provide wildlife habitat with the addition of riparian plantings such as native shrubs and trees along the channel bank. In -stream woody debris will also be added to provide fish rearing and refuge habitat. Springbrook Creek is within Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9. The draft WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan identifies the need for improving fish passage riparian habitat and water quality to benefit Chinook salmon and other salmonids. H:\File Sys1SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA 11- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District 3 Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Regional Funding Principles Established by the King County Regional Task Force The project satisfies regional task force funding principles criteria 3,1(ii), which states: "Habitat restoration which enhances ecological significant fish runs". Description of how this project meets this criteria: This project is located on Springbrook Creek, which historically has poor water quality, particularly low dissolved oxygen due to high water temperatures. The basin, especially the valley floor has become highly urbanized with large commercial and industrial areas that directly discharge to Springbrook Creek. This project will address water quality by planting plants and trees along the channel bank that will help provide shade and help cool the creek during the summer months. Woody debris will also be incorporated into the project to provide channel rearing and refuge habitat for salmon. 3. Project Activities and Measurable Results: Project activities include the following: • Replace existing undersized culverts with a new box culvert to increase conveyance capacity and reduce flooding of SW 34`h Street and upstream storm pipe systems. • Construct stream bypass during provide dewatering of groundwater during construction. • Relocate utilities. • Provide a more natural and better -lined streambed to enhance fish passage. This includes adding new spawning gravel substrate within the culvert. • Provide riparian habitat planting including a mix of shrubs and trees along the stream bank upstream and downstream of the new culvert. Measurable Results include: • After project construction, observe lower water surface elevations in the channel upstream of SW 340' Street during high flow events. • A year after construction complete, observe the establishment of native riparian plants in areas planted as part of project restoration. 4. Budget Expenses Budget Item KCD Funds Other Funds City of Renton Total Salaries and Benefits Travel/Meals/Mileage Office/ Field Supplies icesd [jCMtracted/Professional $55,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 Ac uisition Permits Other TOTAL 555,084.85 $844,915.15 $900,000 5. Describe how KCD funding will be acknowledged over the duration of the project. HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I- Interagency CooperationTing Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp King Conservation District Municipality Noncompetitive Grant Application Funding will be acknowledged, reported and tracked using the State of Washington Accounting and Reporting System or `BARS". The use of taxpayer funds provided through the King Conservation District for the above -described projects will be acknowledged through newspaper articles, websites or other information released during project implementation. Attachments 1 -Z/70� Date HAFile Sys\SWA - Surface Water Section Administration\SWA I I- Interagency Cooperation\King Conservation District\2002-2005 KCD Grants\1003 City Correspondence\City KCD grant application.doc\AQtp Black River East Side mien River Water Ouality King c.,ounty Watershed iundary Management Plan Study Area �.%------•� r- eek r Panther Lake I t �•_•-1 (� 1 I I LKing Count Garrison j Renton Creek 1 Renton j ^ I King County 5pr�ingbr, ._._._.f �._._._..i �.J'•_..l Valley Area 0; 167 Kent Springbrook Creek ,"? East Valley Road W Black River Pump Station Tukwila 0 3000 6000 1 1 j APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET Springbrook Creek 81 181 N Kent N Kent Lagoons EAST SIDE GREEN FINER WATERSHED PROJECT FIGURE 6-1 PROJECT AREA I r I i i , _SWTWRS I Z5 1 �j RENTON SHOPPING Ail A41B6l ENTER MORRIS AV S -RD WHIT -flip RQL6vo HILLS CREEK ----------- �zz - SHATTUCK SHATTUCK t, 75, WAS A'j VALLEY GENERAL cL Ln TALBOf CREEK WE"" PANTHER HOSPI AV S r ]!Z:;�_ � 167 - - , -- " TAL - - -- ------ A 36'x48' BOX SR-IG7 36 60' • LA E VALLEY RD !F rf� .Z I v1I I j 48' 1-405 AV S AV Lill SW 34 Street Culvert SENCA tIII ReplacementProject i ji iA I It i SCALE 1*=1000' 0 OM, AS AV W F It ig CONNECTING r I CHANNEL PROJECT (COMPLETED 60' 1995) OAKESD;W,AV SW 36- LEGENDI I VALLEY AREA 3fi i; (STUDY AREA) 36' DIAMETER STORM DRAIN I STREAM/DRAINAGE CHANNEL i i '� _ CULVERT(S) JACKSON. SW 48 tj &L PUMP STATION FLOOD WATER CR STORAGE POND TUKWILA R RENTON CITY LIMITS EAST SIDE GREEN RNIER WATERSHED PROJECT BLACK' t WEST VAEE�yy_ "g: H RTVER FIGURE 6-2 PUMP STATION RENTON VALLEY AREA EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO GREEN-DUWAMISH RIVER � \ c�EE�s �`_� CITY OF RENTON, WASHiNGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (JONES AVENUE PROPERTIES) FROM RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC (R-8) ZONING TO RESOURCE CONSERVATION (RC), FILE NO. LUA- 05-006 (CPA 2005-M-1, AREA El). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residential 8 du/ac; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 5, 2005, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHNGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Resource Conservation (RC) as hereinbelow specified. The EDNSP ORDINANCE NO. Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Property consisting of approximately 5.4 acres located along Jones Avenue). SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1229:11/21/05:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor F171-i1 R `A ATTACHMENT A BONES AVENUE PROPERTIES REZONE FROM R 8 TO RC LUA 05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, AREA El LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 108 through Lot 119, inclusive, of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Div. No. 2, as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 64, records of King County, Washington, said plat being situated in the northwest quarter of Section 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH that portion of road (N 38a' Street) that attached by Operation of Law per City of Renton Ordinance No. 1941; EXCEPT those portions lying westerly of the easterly right-of-way margin of SR 405 (State Highway No. 1, FLY SEC STATE HWY NO. 2-A); and EXCEPT roads Properties on Jones Rd. Rezone from R-8 to RC LUA05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area E1 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 0 200 "�( TOO Alex Pietsch, Administrator G. Del Rosario 16 November 2W5 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (MONTEREY COURT PROPERTIES) FROM RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC (R-4) ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL 1 DU/AC (R-1), FILE NO. LUA-05-006 (CPA 2005-M 1, AREA E2� WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residential 4 du/ac; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 5, 2005, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential 1 du/ac as hereinbelow specified. The EDNSP Administrator is ORDINANCE NO. hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Property in a native growth protection easement as part of the Brookridge Plat). SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1230 :11 /21 /0 5 : m a Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. Wilco 2 ATTACHMENT A MONTEREY COURT PROPERTIES REZONE FROM R 4 TO R-1 LUA 05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, AREA E2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts D and E of Brookridge, as recorded in Volume 210 of Plats, Pages 78-82, records of King County, Washington, said plat being situated in the southeast quarter of Section 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. IM 1-� V'--i Attachment B Properties adjacent to Monterey Ct. Rezone from R-4 to R-1 LUA05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area E2 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 0 200 ' A TOO Alex Pictsch, Administrator G. Del Rosario 16 November 2005 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (NE 28TH STREET AND EDMONDS AVENUE PROPERTIES) FROM RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC (R 8) ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL 1 DU/AC (R 1), FILE NO. LUA-05-006 (CPA 2005-M 1, AREA E3). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residential 8 du/ac; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 5, 2005, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential 1 du/ac as hereinbelow specified. The Neighborhoods and ORDINANCE NO. Strategic Planning Division is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Near NE 28'h Street and Edmonds Avenue). SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1231:11 /21 /05 : ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. 2 ATTACHMENT A NE 28TI STREET AND EDMONDS AVE PROPERTIES REZONE FROM R 8 TO R 1 LUA 05-006, CPA 2005-M 1, AREA E3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Those portions of the northwest quarter of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and the southeast quarter of Section 32 and the southwest quarter of Section 33, both in Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., all in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast comer of said southeast quarter of Section 32; Thence northerly, along the east line of said Section 32, a distance of 30 feet, to the northerly right-of-way margin of NE 286' Street, said right-of-way margin also being the southerly line of Tract 369, C. D. Hillmans Lake Washington Garden of Eden No. 6, as recorded in Volume 11, Page 84, records of King County, Washington; Thence westerly along said southerly line of said Tract 369 and said northerly right-of- way margin, a distance of 470 feet; Thence N 000 51'40" E, to the north line of said Tract 369; Thence easterly along said north line, to a point 103.63' westerly of the east line of said Section 32; Thence southeasterly, along a zoning boundary line separating RC and R-8 zones, across portions of Sections 32 and 33 in said Township 24 and across a portion of Section 4 in said Township 23, to the point of intersection of the easterly boundary of the west 641.42 feet of said northwest quarter of said Section 4 and the northerly right-of-way margin of NE 270' Street; Thence westerly, northwesterly and westerly along said northerly right-of-way margin to a point on the west line of said northwest quarter, Thence northerly along said west line to the northwest comer of said northwest quarter, said northwest comer also being the southeast comer of the southeast quarter of Section 32, and the point of beginning; EXCEPT that portion of said Tract 369 defined as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Tract 369, a distance of 390 feet westerly of the east line of said Section 32; Thence westerly, along said south line, a distance of 80 feet; Thence N 00*5 F40" E, a distance of 120 feet, Thence S 89°32'00" E, a distance of 64.59 feet; Thence S 38°09'49" E, a distance of 24.47 feet; Thence S 00*51'40" W, a distance of 100.88 feet, to the point of beginning. EXCEPT roads. e ..yi E_N aiTT-:- m Attachment B NE 28th and Edmonds Properties Rezone from R-8 to R-1 LUA05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area E3 0 Economic Development, Neighborboods & Strategic Planning 0 300 600 Alex Pietsch, Administrator G. Del Rosario 16 November 2(W CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (MAPLEWOOD GLEN AND VICINITY) FROM RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC (R 8) ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC (R 4), FILE NO. LUA-05-006 (CPA 2005-M 1, AREA L2). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residential 8 du/ac; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 5, 2005, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential 4 du/ac as hereinbelow specified. The EDNSP ORDINANCE NO. Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Maplewood Glen and Vicinity). SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 123 3 :11 /21 /05 : ma ATTACHMENT A MAPLEWOOD GLEN AND VICINITY REZONE R-8 TO R-4 LUA 05-006, CPA 2045-M-1, AREA L2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The plat of Maplewood Division 1, as recorded in Volume 39 of Plats, Page 24, records of King County, Washington, and the plat of Maplewood Division 2, as recorded in Volume 39 of Plats, Page 39, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT Lot A and Lot C of City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment No. LUA-99-167- LLA, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 20000522900016; and EXCEPT that portion of Block 9 in said Maplewood Division 2, described as City of Renton Short Plat No. LUA-99-093-SHPL, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 20010105900006, records of King County, Washington; and EXCEPT the southerly 120 feet of the westerly 88.25 feet, as measured along the southerly line and at right angles thereto, of Lot 9, said Block 9 of Maplewood Division 2; and EXCEPT Tracts A and B of said Maplewood Division 2 and that portion of Maplewood Park Place that attached to Tract A by Operation of Law per City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 4600; and EXCEPT that portion of Lot 9, Block 6 of said Maplewood Division 2, described as follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner of Lot 1, Block 6 of said plat; Thence S 61' 09' 15" E along the southwesterly line of said lot, a distance of 50 feet; Thence S 09° 55' 00" W, a distance of 51 feet; Thence N 65° 05' 00" W, a distance of 40 feet, to a point on the west line of said Lot 9; Thence northerly along said west line of said Lot 9, a distance of 59.6 feet, to the point of beginning; EXCEPT roads and highways; TOGETHER WITH the plat of Cedar River Summer Homes Sites, as recorded in Volume 31 of Plats, Page 44, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads; All situate in Government Lots 4 and 6 and the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 16, and in Government Lots 1 and 5 of Section 21, all in Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. rent B Maplewood Glen and Vicinity Rezone from R-8 to R-4 LUA05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area L2 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning • Alex Pieneb. Adminblreror \ / G. Del Rosario e) 16 November 20D5 III 114FA JaNFA .........................:.. CITY OF RENTON, WASH NGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 4-1-150, FIRE PREVENTION FEES, OF CHAPTER 1, ADNIINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY AMENDING THE FIRE PREVENTION FEES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Section 4-1-150 of Chapter 1, Administration and Enforcement, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 4-1-150 FIRE PREVENTION FEES: Value of Work Fee Amount $0 to $249.99 $30.00 $250.00 to $999.99 1:$20.00 plus 2% of the cost $1,000.00 to $4,999.99 $50.00 plus 2% of the cost $5,000.00 or more $60.00 plus .9% of the cost Construction Re -inspection A fee of $60.00 per hour may be assessed if the requested inspection does not meet the approval of the inspector Infraction Re -inspection after 30-day $50.00 period (whenever 30 days or more have passed since Fire Department notification of an infraction which required re - inspection and such violation has not been remedied or re -inspected) 1 ORDINANCE NO. Pre -citation follow-up inspection when $50.00 each inspection. re -inspections are required beyond the original re —inspection. Malfunctioning fire alarm fee. First, second, and third false alarms - no charge. Fourth and fifth false alarms in a calendar year - $50.00/each. Sixth false alarm and successive false alarms in a calendar year - $ 100. 00/each. Late payment penalty $25.00 for late payment of malfunctioning fire alarm fee and pre -citation inspection fee. Operational Fire Code Permit (issued in $60.00 per year. Exception 1— Non profit accordance with Section 105.6 of the IFC) place of assemble permit $20.00 per year. Exception 2 — Hazardous materials and HPM facilities $100.00 per year. Construction Permit 20% of the above Plan Review/Inspection Fee or a minimum of $50.00, whichever is eater Replacement for lost permit $25.00 for each permit. Hazardous Production Materials Permit $100.00 per year (for businesses storing, handling, or using hazardous production materials as regulated in the Fire Code Underground Tank Removal Permit See plan review and construction permit Commercial fees. Underground Tank removal or $60.00 abandonment -in -place permit residential SECTION IL This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2006. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1236:11/23/05:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 3 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 1, FEE SCHEDULE, OF TITLE V, FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS, OF ORDINANCE NO.4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY INCREASING CERTAIN GOLF COURSE GREENS FEES. WHEREAS, the City of Renton wishes to provide to its citizens the most cost effective services possible; and WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted a policy that the golf course fees shall cover the costs of services; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Section 5-1-5 of Chapter 1, Fee Schedule, of Title V, Finance and Business Regulations, of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 5-1-5: GOLF COURSE FEES A. Greens Fees: The cost of golf course greens fees shall be as follows: 18 Hole / Weekday $26.00 18 Hole / Weekend $32.00 9 Hole / Weekday $18.00 9 Hole / Weekend $19.00 1 ORDINANCE NO. 18 Hole / Seniors / Weekday $19.00 9 Hole / Seniors / Weekday $13.00 18 Hole / Junior / Weekday $16.00 9 Hole / Junior / Weekday $12.00 For purposes of this ordinance, weekend shall mean Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. Weekday shall mean the remaining four days of the week. B. Golf Cart Fees: 18 Hole course $24.00 9 Hole course $14.00 SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective April 1, 2006. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: OR D :1221:11 /21 /0 5 : ma Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor F 2005. 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 8-2-2.G AND 8-2-3.E.1 OF CHAPTER 2, STORM AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE; SECTIONS 8-4-24 AND 8-4-31 OF CHAPTER 4, WATER; AND SECTION 8-5-15 OF CHAPTER 5, SEWERS, OF TITLE VIII (HEALTH AND SANITATION) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY INCREASING FEES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 8-2-2.G of Chapter 2, Storm and Surface Water Drainage, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: G. Special Rates: 1. a. Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualified under Section 8-4-3 LC for low-income rates prior to August 1, 1994, are eligible for rates of one dollar sixteen cents ($1.16) per month for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy, or one dollar sixty cents ($1.60) for a forty percent (40%) rate subsidy. b. Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualify under Section 8-4-3 LC for low-income rates after August 1, 1994, are eligible for rates of one dollar forty three cents ($1.43) per month for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy, or three dollars forty cents ($3.40) for a forty percent (40%) subsidy. C. Double occupancy households who qualify under Section 8-4-3 LC for low-income rates after August 1, 1994 with an income between thirty percent (30%) and fifty 1 ORDINANCE NO. percent (50%) of the median household income for King County will pay three dollars and eighteen cents ($3.18) per month. SECTION II. Section 8-2-3.E.1 of Chapter 2, Storm and Surface Water Drainage, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: E. Charges For Surface Water Utility: 1. The following schedule is hereby adopted as the monthly charges to be paid to the City for surface water utility services: a. Single-family dwelling $5.55 per unit b. Low intensity, 0.5 acre or less $13.75 per acre C. Medium intensity, 0.5 acre or less $19.89 per acre d. High Intensity, 0.5 acre or less $25.65 per acre e. Low intensity, more than 0.5 acre $27.50 per acre f. Medium intensity, more than 0.5 acre $39.77 per acre g. High intensity, more than 0.5 acre $51.29 per acre h. Gravel pits $55.30 per acre i. City streets $13.79 per acre SECTION III. 8-4-24.A.1 of Chapter 4, Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Fire Protection Charge: The private fire protection charge will be three dollars sixty eight cents ($3.68) per month per inch of fire meter size. 2 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION IV. Section 8-4-31.B of Chapter 4, Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: B. Metered Rates: 1. The minimum rates for metered water supplied within the City in one month or fractional period thereof are hereby fixed in the following schedule: Size Of Service Total Service Charge 3/4 in. $ 11.36 1 in. 14.23 1-1/2 in. 18.23 2 in. 31.87 3 in. 94.36 4 in. 136.40 6 in. 204.63 8 in. 284.22 10 in. 409.26 12 in. 568.44 2. Commodity Rates: Two (2) consumption blocks will be established for residential customers (single-family and duplex customers). The size of the first block will be zero to one thousand (0 to 1,000) cubic feet of water consumed per month. The second block will be all consumption over one thousand (1,000) cubic feet per month. The rates for these two (2) blocks are as follows: 1 to 1,000 cubic feet $1.91 Over 1,000 cubic feet $2.04 All commercial customers (multi -family, commercial and industrial) will pay for consumption at the first block rate of one dollar ninety one cents ($1.91) per one hundred (100) cubic feet. 3 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION V. Section 8-4-31.C.1 of Chapter 4, Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: Low -Income Seniors: A "low-income senior citizen" is defined as a person sixty- two (62) years of age or older who resides in a single-family dwelling that is separately metered for water usage, either as owner, purchaser, or renter, and whose total income, including that of his or her spouse or co -tenant, does not exceed the annual income threshold for low-income rate eligibility. The annual income threshold for eligibility for low-income rate shall be adjusted annually, using the Income Guidelines for King County as provided annually by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Any household with a disposable income of thirty percent (30%) or less of the median household income for King County will be eligible for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy. Any household with an annual disposable income between thirty percent (30%) and fifty percent (50%) of the King County median household income is eligible for a forty percent (40%) rate subsidy. For the calendar year 2006 those figures shall be sixteen thousand three hundred fifty dollars ($16,350) or less per annum for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy and between sixteen thousand three hundred fifty dollars ($16,350) and twenty seven thousand two hundred fifty dollars ($27,250) for a forty percent (40%) rate subsidy for single occupancy, and for double occupancy eighteen thousand seven hundred dollars ($18,700) or less for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy, and between eighteen thousand seven hundred dollars ($18,700) and thirty one thousand one hundred fifty dollars ($31,150) for a forty percent (40%) rate subsidy. For households with more than two (2) individuals qualifying under subsection C of this Section, an additional five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) is added to the income threshold per qualifying individual. 4 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION VI. Section 8-4-31.C.4 of Chapter 4, Water, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Low -Income Rates: a. For those senior citizens and disabled persons who qualified as economically disadvantaged and were on this low-income rate prior to August 1, 1994, the following rates for water service relating to such single-family dwelling in which such eligible person or persons permanently reside are as follows: (1) One dollar thirty five cents ($1.35) per month for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy and two dollars forty three cents ($2.43) for a forty percent (40%) rate subsidy, limited to nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per month. this Section. (2) Any excess shall be charged as provided in subsections A and B of b. For those senior citizens and disabled persons who qualify as economically disadvantaged, and were on this low-income rate after August 1, 1994, the following rates for water service relating to such single-family dwelling in which such eligible person or persons permanently reside: (1) Two dollars ninety eight ($2.98) per month for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy, limited to nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per month, and seven dollars fourteen cents ($7.14) per month for a forty percent (40%) rate subsidy, limited to nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per month. 5 ORDINANCE NO. (2) Any excess shall be charged as provided in subsections A and B of this Section, except for those persons who qualify under home kidney dialysis. These customers are limited to one thousand seven hundred (1,700) cubic feet of water per month before any excess is charged as provided in subsections A and B of this Section. For those senior citizens and disabled persons who become eligible according to the criteria in subsections C 1 and C2 of this Section after the effective date hereof, the following rates for water service relating to such single-family dwelling in which such eligible person or persons permanently reside: (1) Two dollars seventy one cents ($2.71) per month, limited to nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per month, and for households with income thirty percent (30%) or less of the median household income for King County; and six dollars forty nine ($6.49) per month, limited to nine hundred (900) cubic feet of water per month for double occupancy households with income between thirty percent (30%) and fifty percent (50%) of the median household income for King County. (2) Any excess shall be charged as provided in subsections A and B of this Section. SECTION VII. Section 8-5-15.A of Chapter 5, Sewers, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Disposal Rates: The monthly rates and charges for sewage disposal service shall be as follows: Single -Family: Thirteen dollars ninety seven cents ($13.97). 10 ORDINANCE NO. 2. All Other Users: A base charge of two dollars twelve cents ($2.12) plus one dollar fifty eight cents ($1.58) per month for each hundred (100) cubic feet of water used, but not less than thirteen dollars ninety seven cents ($13.97) per month. 3. Charges For Sewer Service Without City Water: In the event that water obtained from sources other than purchased from the City is either discharged or drained into the sewer system, users shall be charged by one of the two (2) following methods: ($13.97) per month. For single-family residences, thirteen dollars ninety seven cents b. For other than single-family dwellings, the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator shall install a water meter into such private water system at cost to property owners, and the method of billing shall be in compliance with subsection A.2 of this Section. SECTION VIII. Sections 8-5-15.0 and D of Chapter 5, Sewers, of Title VIII (Health and Sanitation) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as follows: C. Service Outside Of City: The rates to such special uses shall be one and one-half (1-1/2) times the basic City water rates applicable to resident users for similar services plus any monthly fees levied by King County Wastewater except that such exemptions and discounts as provided in RMC 8-4-32 and subsections DA and D.5 of this Section shall likewise apply to these rates. D. Additional Charges: In addition to the foregoing charges specified in this Section, the following rates shall be charged: 7 ORDINANCE NO. 1. A charge of twenty five dollars sixty cents ($25.60) per month payable to King County Wastewater for each single-family dwelling unit. 2. A charge of twenty five dollars sixty cents ($25.60) per month payable to King County Wastewater for each seven hundred and fifty (750) cubic feet, or any fraction thereof, of water used for all users other than single-family. 3. Any additional charges hereafter imposed by King County Wastewater under the "Industrial Cost Recovery" or "Industrial Waste Surcharge" programs required under the FWPCA (PL 92-500), Section 204, or as same may be amended hereafter, plus fifteen percent (15%) thereof as an additional charge for the City's cost of implementing such programs. 4. Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualified under RMC 8-4-3 LC for low-income rates prior to August 1, 1994, are eligible for the following rates: a. Twenty five dollars sixty cents ($25.60) per month for King County Wastewater sewer, and one dollar twenty cents ($1.20) per month for City sewer charges for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy and two dollars twenty eight cents ($2.28) per month for City sewer charges for a forty percent (40%) rate subsidy. b. Senior and/or disabled citizens who qualify under RMC 8-4-3 LC for low-income rates after August 1, 1994, are eligible for the following rates: (1) Twenty five dollars sixty cents ($25.60) per month for King County Wastewater sewer and three dollars fifty eight cents ($3.58) per month for City sewer charges for a seventy five percent (75%) rate subsidy, and eight dollars forty cents ($8.40) per month for City sewer charges for a forty percent (40%) rate subsidy. M. ORDINANCE NO. (2) For double occupancy households, seven dollars eighty four cents ($7.84) per month for households with incomes between thirty percent (30%) and fifty percent (50%) of the median household income for the City. 5. For those senior citizens sixty two (62) years of age or older and/or disabled citizens, when such seniors and/or disabled citizens are not otherwise eligible for special rates as low-income seniors and/or disabled citizens, but who qualify for property tax exemption pursuant to RCW 84.36.381(5)(a) and are not residents of the City shall be exempt from the fifty percent (50%) utility surcharge applicable to those customers not residents of the City. To receive this exemption the applicant must provide the information required under RMC 8-4- 31.C.2. SECTION IX. This ordinance shall be effective January 1, 2006. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1218 :12/01 /05 : ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor E Lan(�ffrust . RESIDENTIAL I ROPERIY DEVEfAPMEM November 23, 2005 Renton City Council Renton City Hall -- 71h Floor 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 i e e-0S-00,2 ;TY OF RENTON NO V 2 3 2005 RECEIVED i I Y CLERK'S OFFICE 3 -. 3 RE: COST SHARING REQUEST Wedgewood Lane Divisions 1, 2 and 3 (LUA03-053, LUA05-009, -086) HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL: In order to service the above -mentioned preliminary plats with sanitary sewer, the City's Wastewater Utility has requested that we make two improvements to facilitate future development of surrounding properties: a. Upsizing of a sanitary sewer lift station to handle a tributary area of approximately 238 acres; b. Installation of a sewer main in Hoquiam Avenue NE that will accommodate future development to the west of our project. I have attached a schedule of values that outlines our costs to perform this work. We respectfully request that the City Council approve their share of the cost to make these improvements, per this estimate Sincerely, LANDTRUST, INC. 4 Patrick J. Gilroy Actual costs may vary. 1560140Tti AVE NE dd : )Oar SUITE 100 BELLEVUE, WA 98005 [425] 747-1726 [425] 747-4157 FAx WWW.LANDTRUSTINC.COM Page 1 of 1. Lanc!Tru-qt Inc Wedgewood Lane, 123 Lots Sanitary Sewer Lift Station .....,.,ow I , .- ORIGINAL COST ESTIMATE/BUDGET "QUANTUNlT,pRfCEV,,`TOTAL" # I City of Renton Cost Sh rinq ',"1QUANTITY 'PEJR I UNIT PRICE �,`TOT , QUANTITY LandT PER ustCost Sharinq I UNIT PRICE TOTAL 11 7777 Lift Station Forcernain to Hogwarn Permit Subtotal Tax (8.8%) Total "f„sue 1 I 1 _LS LS LS 437,700.00 60,493,00 14,025,00 4137700.00 60,493.00 14,025.00 512,218.00 43,840.98 556,058.98 777= 1 # I 1 LS LS LS 7 1 135,00000 0,00 0.00 135,000.00 000 - 0,00 135,000.00 11,880.00 146880.00 1 1 1 LS LS LS 1 302,700.00 60,493.00 14,025. 00 302,700.00 60,493.00 14,025.00 377,218.00 31,960.981 409,178.98771 Gravity Conx from Ex. Lift Station I Demo & Clear Erosion Cntri Raise Ex MH to grade Core, ronnect, re -channel ex MH 101, PVC 10" DI Type It 48" MH Extra Depth De -Water Quarry Rock Export Unsuitable 1 1 1 I 485 21 3 9 1 I 725 - S LS LS LS LF LF LS VF LS LS TN 3,150.00 840.00 63 00 3,36000 29.40 4410 1 2,85000 1 31500 1 1.575.00 1 1,57500 1050 3,150.00 840.00 630 00 3,360.00 14,259,00 92610 8,550.00 2,835.001# 1,575.00 1,575.00 7,612,50 -1-6,380.00 # 1 # 1 # 1 # 1 # 485 # 21 # 3 9 # 1 # 1 # 725 LS LS LS LS LS LF LF LS VF LS LS TN 3,150,00 84000 1 63000 1 3.36000 1 29.40 44.10 2,850,00 315,00 11,575.00 1,57500 10.50 3,150.00 84000 630.00 3.36000 14,259.00 926.10 8,550.00 2,835.00 1,575.00 1.575.00 7,612.50 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 _2 0 LS LS LS Ls LF LF LS VF LS- LS TN 3,150.00 1 840.00 1 63000 T-- 3,36000 29.40 4410 2,850.00 315.00 1,575.00 1,57500 10.50 0.00 70-0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 Select Backfill 1260 TN 13.00 # 1260 TN 1300 16,380.00 0. TN 13.00 0.00 Sawcut, demo, restore road I LS 3,750,00 3,750.00 # 1 LS 3,750.00 3,750.00 0 LS 3,750.00 0.00 Construct temp road I LS 1.890.00 1 LS 1,890,00 1,890.00 0 LS 1,890.00 0.00 Pothole ex Utils 1 LS 1,260.00 1,260 00 # 1 LS 1,260.00, 1,260.00 0 LS 1,260.00 0.00 Repair 24" culvert 1 LS 525.00 525.007- 1 LS 1 525,00 52500 0 LS 52500 0.00 Connect to ex lift sta 1 LS 1,050.00 1,0%00 # 1 LS 1 1,05000, 1,050.00 0 LS 1,05000 000 Traffic cntrI I LS 1 1.260,00 1,260.00 # I LS 1 1,26000 1,260.00 0 LS 1,260.00 0.00 Test and t.v. 1 LS 1 535.00 535.00 # LS 1 53500 535.00 0 LS 535.00 0.00 Subtotal 1 71,962.60 71,962.60 0.00 Tax (8.8%) 6,332.71 6,332.71 0.00 Contingency (15%) 10,794.39 10,794.39 0.0-0 . . ... Total 7 77=�' 7777 8908970 777777777 8908970 77 -7777 7,f- 0.00 Hoquiam SS Install & Rd Restoration Design & permit fees 1 LS 13,414.00 13,414.00 1 LS 3,35150 3,353.50 1 LS 10,060.50 10,06050 48" MH 3 EA 2,850,00 8,550 00 # 3 EA 712.50 2,137.50 3 EA 2,137,50 6,412.50 Extra depth 3 VF 315,00 945,00 # 3 VF 1 7875 236.25 3 VF 236.25 - 708.75 8" PVC 493 LF 2450 12,07&50 # 493 LF 1 6,13 3,01963 493 LF 1838 9,058.88 61, PVC 90 LF 20.00 1,800Z0 # 90 LF 1 500 45000 90 LF 1500 1,35000 Pothole exist utils I LS 9E 00 900.00 # 1 LS 22500 225,00 11 LS 1 67500 67577 Export spoils 438 CY 10.50 4,599.00 # 438 CY 263 1,14975 4381 CY 1 7.88 3,449.25 Select backfill 644 TN 1300 8,372.00 # 644 TN 325 2,09300 644 TN 975 6,279.00 Sawcut 1026 LF 352 3,611.52 # 1026 LF 902.88 1026 LF 264 2,70864 Traffic cnIrl I LS 8,00000 8,300.00 ; 1 LS -----088 2,00000 2,000.00 1 LS 6,000.00 6,00000 4" ATB 155 TN 52.00 8,060 001# 155 TN 13,00 2,015,00 1,55 TN 3900 6,04500 Test and t v 493 LF 0.88 433,841# 493 LF 0.22 10846 493 LF 066 32538 Raise MH to finish. grade 3 EA 253.00 759.00 # 3 EA 63.25 189,75 3 EA 189,75 56925 Asphalt demo & remove 110 TN 32.00 3,520.00 # 1101 TN 1 8.00 880,00 7-0 TN 24.00 2,640.00 Remove 9" subgrade 110 CY 9.20 1,012.00 # 110 CY 1 2.30 253,00 110 CY 6.90 75900 Install crushed rock base 120 TN 18.31 2,197 20 # 120 TN 1 458 549,30 120 TN 13.73 1,6479-0 2" Class b 75 7�N 60.00 4,500.00 # 75 TN 1500 1,12500 75 TN 4500 3,37500. Striping I LS 1 1,000.00 1,000.00 # 1 LS 250.00 25000 1 LS 75000 750,00 Subtotal 83,752.06 20,938.02 62,814.05 Tax (8.8%) 6,189.75 1,547.44 4,642.31 Contingency (15%) '2' N 2,637.68 7,913.03 Total '50,42 25,123.13 75,30.39 GRAND ib*At 746 641. ;..20 � 092 83 484,54S.37 Summary: Grand Total $745,641.20 LandTrust Cost Sharing ($484,548.37) City of Renton Cost Sharing $261,092.83 APPT-WED BY COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE QTV�;�]. COMMITTEE REPORT Date la-S aDOS + December 5, 2005 ADOPTION OF THE 2006 BUDGET ORDINANCES, AS FOLLOWS: PROPERTY TAX LEVY FIRE PREVENTION FEES GOLF COURSE GREENS FEES VARIOUS UTILITY FEES 2006 BUDGET (Referred October 24, 2005) Property Tax Lew. The preliminary information provided by King County, and used to develop the revenue estimates, provided a total general government property tax estimate of $21,755,827. This was based on a new construction estimate of $167,912,009. In developing the 2006 budget estimate, we used the property tax estimate contained in the long-term financial forecast of $22,026,700. This was based on an estimate of $250,000,000 in new construction. We believed that the estimate was a bit high, but left some room for fine-tuning of the county's estimates. A revised preliminary property tax worksheet was recently provided by King County. It revised the estimate for total general government property taxes to $22,209,409 based on $311,622,057 in new construction. This difference will not be collected without a revision to the ordinance. Original County .Budget Estimate ; Final County Tax amount 21,755827 22,026,700 22,209,409 New construction AV 167,912,009 250,000,000 ;' 311,622,057 _ .w _ .. . Recommendation is to add $182,709 to General Fund reserves and amend the 2006 budget to invest in needs as identified in Priorities of Government effort and Council retreat. These funds cannot be spent without additional Council action. Fire Prevention Fees. The Committee of the Whole recommends that certain Fire Plan Review and Inspection Fees be increased. Golf Course Greens Fees. The Committee recommends that certain Golf Course Greens Fees be increased. Various Utilities Fees. To meet the capital and operating expenses of Utilities, as recommended by Public Works Administration, the Committee recommends that certain utility fees be increased for surface water, surface water utility services, special rates for senior and/or disabled citizens and double occupancy households, the fire protection charge, minimum rates for metered water, commodity rates, commercial customers, low-income rates, disposal rates for sewage, and King County wastewater sewer rates. 2006 Budget. The Committee recommends adoption of the 2006 Budget, including the following changes: • Increase revenue estimate in the General Fund for property taxes by $50,000. • Increase revenue estimate in the General Fund for Intergovernmental revenues by $200,000. • Increase the Police Department budget in the General Fund by $200,000 to provide for two additional police officers. Increase the Council budget, Professional Services account, by $15,000. Increase the reserve account in the General Fund by $35,000. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT ADOPTION OF THE 2006 BUDGET ORDINANCES December 5, 2005 Page 2 • Reduce appropriation in Fund 316 by $4.2 million for a Parks Maintenance Facility, and increase the Parks Maintenance Facility reserve fund balance correspondingly. • Reduce appropriation in Fund 316 by $68,000 for a park in the Heather Downs neighborhood, and increase the undesignated fund balance correspondingly. The Committee recommends a total, balanced 2006 Budget of $172,019,527 The Committee further recommends that the Ordinances regarding these matters be presented for first reading. Terri Briere, City , ouncil President cc: Michael E. Bailey, Finance & Information Services Administrator Dennis Culp, Community Services Lee Wheeler, Fire Chief Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES COMMITTEE REPORT December 5, 2005 Council. C' 'mi, e, Ass gnm#rats for 200 APPf'Olmo By CTy COUNCIL Date /a-s- Aoos" The Committee on Committees recommends the following committee chairmanships and committee assignments for the Council for 2006: FINANCE 727T4 M—ondays, 5:00 pm) Don Persson, Chair Denis W. Law, Vice -Chair Toni Nelson, Member PUBLIC SAFETY (1S & 3rd Mondays, 4:00 pm) Denis W. Law, Chair Toni Nelson, Vice -Chair Don Persson, Member UTILITIES (1S &� Thursdays, 4:00 pm) Dan Clawson, Chair Terri Briere, Vice -Chair Denis W. Law, Member F#andy Corman, President-elect r Toni Nelson, President fo-Tem-elect kw" (';'� "-- Denis W. Law, Member PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (15 & 3d Thursdays, 3:00 pm) Terri Briere, Chair Dan Clawson, Vice -Chair Marcie Palmer, Member TRANSPORTATION / AVIATION (1S'& 3 Thursdays, 2:00 pm) Marcie Palmer, Chair Don Persson, Vice -Chair Terri Briere, Member COMMUNITY SERVICES (Is '& 3rd.Mondays, 5:00 pm) Toni Nelson, Chair Marcie PaImer, Vice -Chair Dan Clawson, Member 4do,Oled CITY OF RENTON, WASH NGTON RESOLUTION NO. 57K3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING FACTS, EXTENDING A MORATORIUM ON SEWER AVAELABH.ITY FOR NEW SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE EAST RENTON PLATEAU POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA, AND ESTABLISHING A TERMINATION DATEPR THE MORATORIUM. 04 ?urv- 612-00 b WHEREAS, the City of Renton has established a portion of the East Renton Plateau within its Potential Annexation Area, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has established this portion of the East Renton Plateau as being within its sanitary sewer service area, and WHEREAS, a citizen's group is currently pursuing potential annexation of the East Renton Plateau area; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton desires that all new subdivisions be developed to its land use, zoning and public works standards; and and WHEREAS, subdivisions developed in the county do not comply to all City standards; WHEREAS, once properties are annexed to the City, new subdivisions not vested within the county would be required to meet all City standards; and WHEREAS, declaring a moratorium would prevent vesting of subdivisions before the property could be annexed to Renton; and WHEREAS, a moratorium was established by Resolution No. 3758 to provide adequate time for establishment of an annexation petition to be submitted to the City Council for its consideration; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, such annexation petition has been making adequate progress; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to extend the moratorium to provide adequate time for the petition to be presented to the City Council, and for the Council to consider the advisability of such annexation; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 5th day of December, 2005, to take testimony on extending the moratorium; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASEINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION 11 There is hereby extended a moratorium on issuance of sewer availabilities for new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau annexation area; such moratorium area is shown on the attached map. The purpose of the moratorium is to preclude issuance of any new sanitary sewer availabilities prior to consideration by the City Council of a proposed annexation petition for the East Renton Plateau submitted by the citizens within this potential annexation area. SECTION III. The moratorium shall be in place for a period not to exceed six additional months, unless otherwise extended for one or more additional periods by the City Council, but only if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal, to support such renewal. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 2 2005. RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2005. Kathy Keohker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE S .114 3 :11 / 16/0 5: m a M.M III it JIMIRRIMMI MEMO ,9dojokd a-s=avas CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO..37911 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH KING CONSERVATION DISTRICT NO. 9 FOR AWARD OF A NON- COMPETITIVE GRANT. WHEREAS, King Conservation District No. 9 has funds available to it to assist the City of Renton in providing certain conservation activities that are authorized and described in RCW 89.08.220; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has applied for and received a grant to perform such activities; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions relating to the award of the grant to the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION 11 The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into an agreement for the award of a non-competitive grant to the City of Renton from King Conservation District No. 9. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk 1 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence I Warren, City Attorney RES:1145:11/23/05:ma CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (LINDBERG ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04-008) WHEREAS, under the provisions ofRCW 35A.14.120 as amended, a petition in writing requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about February 28, 2005; and WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A 14.120, and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to assume their fair share of the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified on March 7, 2005, the signatures on the petition for annexation and determined signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the area to be annexed, as provided by law; and ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said Property to the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed May 23, 2005, as the time and place for public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices, public hearings have been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of Intention" approved as of September 22, 2005; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site R-8, eight units per net acre; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS; SECTION L The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of 2 ORDINANCE NO. Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein [Said property, approximately 10.6 acres in area, is generally located north of the centerline of SE 132°d Street and east of the eastern edge of the 138n' Avenue SE right-of-way] and the owners of the property within the annexation shall assume their fair share of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains to the property, and the property shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION LL This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 3 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 123 7:11 /23 /05 : ma EXHIBIT A . LINDBERG ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Southeast quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of the Northwest quarter (1/4) of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 186.15 feet of the west 234 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion for Road (138th Avenue SE); TOGETHER WITH Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 8201220536, records of King County, Washington, in the Northwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH the south 100 feet of the west 190 feet of the north half (1/2) of the Southwest quarter (1/4) of the Northwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH the east 30 feet of the west 220 feet of the south 30 feet of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of 140th Ave SE in the south half (1/2) of the Southwest quarter (1/4) of the Northwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of SE 132nd Street in said subdivision, lying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050 extended southerly, to the south line of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of SE 132°d Street in the Southwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of said Section 15, lying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050 extended southerly, to the southerly right-of-way margin of SE 132°d Street, and lying easterly of the easterly right-of-way margin of 140th Ave SE extended northerly, to the north line of said subdivision; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of right-of-way located at the southeast corner of the intersection of 140th Ave SE and SE 132°d Street in the Southwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of said Section 15, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said subdivision; Thence S 88° 21' 10" E, along the north line of said subdivision, a distance of 62 feet; Thence S 00' 31'45" W, a distance of 30 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence N 88' 21' 10" W, a distance of 20 feet; Thence S 00' 31' 45"W, a distance of 20 feet, to the beginning of a curve to the right (concave to the southeast), having a radius of 20 feet; Thence northeasterly along said curve, an arc distance of 31.81 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ` c � J $ TT I ' AFv `V I 136th CDi X cn 138tf1�;�-_i' I it I 140th! Abe E x 03 o I A ---� A NE 42 F , 11� rd ' e SE 01 0 o I th ve S( -�---� �--� �r Ave NIE ' N I o a� Lons vINfI ii 7LJ�l f r-! CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R4 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL, 4 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO R 8 (RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC; EIGHT DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) (LINDBERG ANNEXATION, FILE NO. A-04-008). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning, which said annexation having previously been approved and the property annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this zoning application, the first hearing being held on May 23, 2005, and the second hearing being held on December 5, 2005; and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned to R-8 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's 1 ORDINANCE NO. zoning ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the zoning ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [Said property, approximately 9.72 acres, is located east of 138h Avenue SE and north of SE 132d Street.] SECTION IL This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.123 8 :11 /23/05 : ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2 EXHIBIT A LINDBERG ANNEXATION. REZONE R-8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Southeast quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of the Northwest quarter (1/4) of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 186.15 feet of the west 234 feet thereof, and EXCEPT those portions for Roads (138t' Avenue SE and 140t' Avenue SE); TOGETHER WITH Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 8201220536, records of King County, Washington, in the Northwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH the south 100 feet of the east 160 feet of the west 190 feet of the north half (1/2) of the Southwest quarter (1/4) of the Northwest quarter (1/4) of the Northeast quarter (1/4) of said Section 15; TOGETHER WITH the east 30 feet of the west 220 feet of the south 30 feet of said north half (1/2) of said subdivision. ' 0 1 . x � Rs ° c- 3. (D d� X O i I I � j 0X = 140th Ave E N� o cc 0 00 0 A 0 E oI 1�-4th Ave SE �' LL136th� e E 13�8 th Ae iSE , ff 7 o .ou r A. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2005 AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S 2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, MAPS AND DATA IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Renton has heretofore adopted and filed a "Comprehensive Plan" and the City Council of Renton has implemented and amended said "Comprehensive Plan" from time to time, together with the adoption of various codes, reports and records; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has heretofore fully recommended to the City Council, from time to time, certain amendments to the City's "Comprehensive Plan"; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton, pursuant to the Washington State Growth Management Act, has been required to review its "Comprehensive Plan"; and WHEREAS, the City has held a public hearing on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has made certain findings and recommendations to the City Council, including implementing policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly determined after due consideration of the testimony and evidence before it that it is advisable and appropriate to amend and modify the City's "Comprehensive Plan" and WHEREAS, such modification and elements for the "Comprehensive Plan" being in the best interest for the public benefit; ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The "Comprehensive Plan," maps, data and reports in support of the "Comprehensive Plan" are hereby modified, amended and adopted as said "Comprehensive Plan" consisting of the following elements: Comprehensive Plan Introduction, Vision, Land Use and Land Use Map, Utilities, and Glossary as shown on the attached Exhibits A, B, C, D and E and incorporated herein as if fully set forth. SECTION II. The Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to make the necessary changes on said City's "Comprehensive Plan" and the maps in conjunction therewith to evidence the aforementioned five amendments. SECTION IV. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file this ordinance as provided by law, and a complete copy of said document likewise being on file with the office of the City Clerk of the City of Renton. SECTION V. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of . 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2005, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1235:11/21/05:ma ATTACHMENT A CITY OF RENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTRODUCTION It is the City of Renton's primary responsibility to provide public services and facilities, develop policies, and adopt regulations that ensure the public health, safety, and welfare. The City government is also charged with guiding the growth of the City so that quality of life of the community and opportunities for its citizens remain high. The guide for Renton's growth and development is the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan and the Growth Management Act The City of Renton Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act of 1990. This legislation requires cities in rapidly growing areas to adopt Comprehensive Plans that include land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, parks, human services, and transportation elements. All elements of the Comprehensive Plan must be consistent with each other and with adopted statewide and countywide planning goals. Statewide planning goals include provisions that discourage urban sprawl, support affordable housing, protect the environment, and support provision of adequate urban services. In addition to these requirements, plans must be designed to accommodate 20- year growth forecasts, determined by regional agencies and local jurisdictions, within well-defined `urban growth areas." Regional or countywide planning has defined "urban centers" in locations where concentrations of people and uses maybe logical. Cities and counties have worked cooperatively to identify where the provision of urban services may be appropriate (the urban growth areas), where urban -rural transition areas are located, and where low density population and low intensity uses will be situated. The Comprehensive Plan (Plan) is a broad statement of community goals, objectives, and policies that directs the orderly and coordinated physical development of the City. Renton's Comprehensive Plan anticipates change and provides specific guidance for future legislative and administrative actions. It is the result of citizen involvement, technical analysis, and the creativity and experience of decision -makers in City government. The Vision, goals, objectives, policies, and maps of the Plan provide the foundation for the regulations, programs, and services that implement the Plan. The Plan serves as a guide for designating land uses, infrastructure Lure development, and community services. The Plan is designed to be a functional document that guides Renton's future development and fulfills the City's regional responsibilities toward state -mandated growth management. The Plan contains background information on Renton's history and profile, citywide trends, and local and regional growth projections. Page 1 of 13 The Plan summarizes a Vision for Renton that has been endorsed by the community. The "Elements" of the Plan contain goals, objectives, and policies that further the evolution of the City toward attaining that Vision. The Planning Process Renton residents, business owners, and City staff work together to shape the future of the community through the ongoing development of the Comprehensive Plan. The planning process provides an opportunity for individual citizens to contribute to this effort by attending community meetings to identify, study, and resolve issues of concern or by serving on committees, task forces, boards, or commissions that function as citizen advisors to the City Council. [The following paragraph moved up from below] Because public input is vital to effective planning, community groups, businesses, and individuals are invited and encouraged to work with City staff to identify and achieve community goals. The following principles should guide the planning process: • Encourage and facilitate public participation in all phases of the planning process. • Work to ensure that the planning process is accessible to all citizens, that it is consistent, timely, and can be widely understood by all potential participants. • Base land use decisions on the interests of the entire community and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. • Demonstrate that proposed land use change responds to the interests and needs of the entire City and the neighborhoods directly impacted by the project, as well as the property owner and the project proponent. • Balance the interests of commercial and residential communities when considering modifications to zoning or development regulations. • Encourage and emphasize open communication between developers and neighbors about land use issues. • Strive for compatibility of land use within the City. The primary responsibility for formulating the Comprehensive Plan rests with the Planning Commission. The Commission is a committee of citizen volunteers appointed by the Mayor to make recommendations to the Council for land use policy changes to the Comprehensive Plan. Before making a recommendation, the Commission conducts public hearings on behalf of the Council. Information and comments presented by individual citizens and community organizations are weighed by the Planning Commission as it prepares Plan revision recommendations to the City Council. The final planning decisions are made by the City Council. The Council is responsible for initiating plan reviews, considering Planning Commission recommendations, and adopting amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. To implement the Plan, the Council is also responsible for adopting the City budget, regulations, programs, and for levying taxes and making appropriations. Changing the Comprehensive Plan Because the City is constantly evolving, it may be occasionally necessary to make revisions to the Comprehensive Plan. These changes are in the form of amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council considers amendments to the Plan, based on recommendations made by the Planning Commission, once a year (unless in the case of an emergency). Proposed amendments may be submitted by the annual deadline by the Mayor, City Council, Planning Commission, or private parties. Implementing the Comprehensive Plan After adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the next step toward realizing the City's Vision is implementation. The Plan is implemented through the Development Standards and Zoning. CITY OF RENTON BACKGROUND Location and Physical Setting Renton is located at the south end of Lake Washington on the edge of metropolitan and rural King County. Its location approximately equidistant from the central business districts of Seattle and Bellevue, and within close proximity to downtown Tacoma, places Renton in the center of a region that is the economic hub of the Northwest. The City is at the crossroads of a regional transportation network where seven State and Interstate highways converge and is central to national and international air travel. Renton covers more than 17 square miles of land and is bordered by King County, Kent, Tukwila, Newcastle, and Bellevue with Seattle nearby. The freeway system is a dominant visual feature of this city. Interstate 405 and SR 167 bisect the City, create visual barriers within the community, and define the edges of districts and neighborhoods. The natural features that define the edges of the City and its neighborhoods include Lake Washington, hills, plateaus, stream corridors, and the valleys of the Green and Cedar Rivers. While development over time has changed the appearance of the community, the natural features have generally remained constant. Renton has a strong sense of community. It is made up of both long-established and vibrant new residential neighborhoods, a strong employment base, and a growing commercial/retail sector. Page 2 of 13 Page 3 of 13 Renton's residential areas have traditionally been organized around schools, parks and other institutions. Both new and existing neighborhoods offer diverse housing stock wide-ranging in unit size, style, type, and price. Although it is one of the older cities within the region, Renton still has vacant and underused land in many neighborhoods, including the historic downtown, that offer an opportunity for growth. Abundant views and green wooded areas characterize the hillsides encircling the downtown and along the Cedar River and May and Honey Creeks. The topography and location of the City afford beautiful scenic views of a variety of significant natural features including Mt. Rainier, Lake Washington, and the Olympic and Cascade Mountains. Renton's Past Duwamish Native Americans werethe earliest known people to live in what is now Renton. The Duwamish had their villages near the confluence of Lake Washington, the Cedar and Black Rivers, at the base of Earlington Hill. In 1853, east coast entrepreneur Henry Tobin came upon this area and laid claim to an area at the confluence of the Cedar and Black Rivers. Being at the confluence of two rivers near a large lake was thought to be ideal for siting a future city for industrial and commercial growth with navigable transportation nearby. The City of Renton was formally established in 1875 with the filing of a plat by the officers of the Renton Coal Company. The plat included the area that now forms the downtown core. Early industries and businesses included coal mining, lumber, brick making, and rail and freight transportation. Early grocery stores and other family -run stores were located in what is presently downtown Renton. The downtown core was linked to other communities by both the Walla Walla Railroad and the Puget Sound Electric Railway. In its early days Renton had many businesses including banking, drug, hardware, junk, grocery, clothing, and home furnishings stores. In 1901, upon incorporation, the City had a total area of one square mile. Since then, incremental annexations have increased the size of the City to encompass approximately 17.3 square miles. Employment in Renton was dominated by industry from when the City was first settled in the mid 1800's. Because of the nearby forests and proximity to water for transport, the first local industry was timber harvesting and processing. Beginning in the 1870's and continuing through the 1940's, Renton was known for its coal mining and brick making operations. Other industries included production and transport of lumber, and the supply of steel, pig iron, and equipment to railroad companies. During this period, the City established itself as an important industrial center. The Boeing Company's decision in the early 1940s to build a new plant at the south end of Lake Washington dramatically influenced the City's future. Rapid growth of the Boeing Company and Pacific Car and Foundry (PACCAR) accelerated the City s rise as a regional industrial and employment center. With construction of the Boeing Company's Renton plant, Renton was transformed from a small town of 4,500 to a thriving city with a population of 16,039 in the decade from 1940-1950. With the shift away from rail toward automobile and truck transportation in the 1940s and 1950s, a new type of regional transportation hub was created in Renton. Two major freeways (Interstate 405 and SR 167) and three State highways (SR 900, 515, and 169) augmented and replaced the rail system. This road system was developed to provide a regional network allowing access around Lake Washington to serve the Renton industrial area. During this period, the transportation demand shifted from exporting raw materials to importing a major work force. The industrial employment centers developed at the same locations formerly occupied by extractive industries --perhaps in part because the transportation network to serve these sites was already well established. This became important because the industrial area remained in the heart of the City and was served by a transportation network that converged on the downtown area. Renton is again experiencing transition of its "downtown" industrial area, as the Boeing Renton Plant within Renton's Urban Center becomes available for redevelopment as mixed -use residential, retail/commercial, office and light industrial uses. Once again, the transportation network is expected to be well positioned to further the transition. Renton developed as an independent city with its own downtown area and surrounding neighborhoods. Through a continuing series of annexations, it has expanded from one square mile in 1901 to more than 17 square miles in 20051. With continued growth, the City provides urban services to an increasing number of businesses and residents. Community Profde Renton has grown from a small, compact town, nestled on the shore of the lake, to a large city that now spreads across the Cedar and Green River Valley floors and onto the adjacent hills. Once separated by Waal areas and open space, Renton and its neighbor cities are growing together and have become part of the larger Puget Sound metropolitan region. Incorporated in 1901, Renton is fifth oldest of King County's 39 cities and ranks fourth in the County in population size2. Renton is the fourteenth most populous city in the state' and King County is the seventeenth most populous county in the nation. The 2000 U.S. Census indicated that Renton had a population increase over the previous ten years of more than 20 percent. Only 1.5 percent of the increase is attributable to annexations. An increase in population of almost 10 percent between 2000 and 2003 indicates that Renton has become one of the fastest growing cities in King County. Renton is currently home to 54,900 people'. In Renton, the largest age group of the population are people of working age (18 to 64 years) at 34,016, five to seventeen year - olds number 7,392, those sixty-five and over number 5,123, and 3,521are under five2. The median age is 35.7 years. Page 4 of 13 Page 5 of 13 The increase in the Renton School District No. 403 population between 1990 and 2000, 18 percent2, was slightly less than the citywide increase. Some annexations during that period included areas of the Issaquah School District (school district boundaries are typically unaffected by changing city boundaries). As the population of the City grows, it also becomes more diverse. The 2000 census indicated that only 68 percent of the population considers itself as white, a change from 83.5 percent from the previous census. Both the Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic/Utino populations more than doubled during the 1990s and the number of Hispanic students in Renton schools increased by 379 percent. An additional 63,600 people live in the unincorporated area surrounding the City in the Fairwood area (40,600), on West Mll/Bryn Mawr/Skyway (14,300), and on the East Plateau (8,700). The average wealth of Renton households is $226,395'. Approximately 8.5 percent of the working age population (18 to 64) lives below the poverty level2. The assessed value of Renton's land area (in thousands of dollars) is 6,272,6326. Almost 52,000 people work for 2,312 employers' and at 1,517 businesses in Renton. These jobs, that are covered by Washington State unemployment insurance, are divided into sectors by type. Manufacturing, with almost 21,000 jobs remains Renton's largest sector. This indicates that The Boeing Company and PACCAR remain major players in the local and regional economy. The next most significant sector, with 11,413 employees, is the Finance, Insurance, Real Estate, and other Services sector. 2 Renton, historically, has been a small town and in many ways it still resembles a small city. But several factors place it on the threshold of change: the continued vitality of Renton's industrial sector, regional population growth; and its location at the crossroads of local, national, and international transportation. These factors foreshadow a new role for Renton as an important metropolitan center in the Region - Renton, along with the rest of the Northwest, has been experiencing an increase in professional and service jobs over the past few years. Boeing's related research and development facilities in and around Renton have been a major factor in the development of office parks south of the downtown and at the north end of the Green River Valley. At the same time, there has been increased demand for goods and services as evidenced by the number and types of commercial businesses in the City. As more land is developed for office and commercial uses there will be less available for future industrial uses and the type of jobs they provide. The pressures of economic growth and progress have resulted in the construction of office buildings, factories, housing projects, and supporting infrastructure in the City. A network of freeways, arterials and transmission lines crisscross Renton and both connect and divide the community. Development occurring outside of the City has also affected the character of Renton. Regional shopping centers competing with Renton's downtown retail core have resulted in a shift in marketable goods in the downtown from general merchandise to specialty items. This transition has changed the visual character of the downtown as businesses open or relocate. Within the next few years, as the first redevelopment of the Boeing Renton Plant occurs, it is anticipated that major national retailers will locate in Renton and provide counter -competition for the shopping malls locate nearby at Factoria and Southcenter. Vacant land remains scattered throughout Renton, but, as infill development continues, land will become an increasingly scarce resource. Some vacant land, located outside of the Urban Center, is environmentally sensitive and may not be suitable for development. As annexations occur, some undeveloped land will become available. There are approximately 975 acres of vacant and developable land within the City of Renton. Of this, the largest blocks of vacant land are generally found in Renton's outlying areas. Smaller parcels that are available for development can be found in the City's existing neighborhoods. The challenge for Renton is to manage growth in a manner that maintains the desirable features of the City while being flexible enough to take advantage of opportunities for change. TRENDS During the 1980s and 1990s, commercial development in Renton shifted away from downtown, as a number of retail and office uses located along major roadways. Although this may have increased convenience to some residents, it also eroded the viability of the downtown, contributed to traffic congestion, intruded upon neighborhoods, and encouraged strip -type commercial development along the major thoroughfares throughout the City and the adjacent unincorporated area. At the end of the decade and the beginning of the new century, however, Renton's downtown core saw several significant developments that indicated a turn -around of the forma trend had begun. City -initiated redevelopment of the Piazza area, including a multi -story public parking garage, a transit center, and performing arts center enhanced several privately initiated mixed -use residential/commercial developments. Following this energetic infusion of creative energy and financing, focus shifted from the Urban Center — Downtown to the Urban Center — North. Changes in The Boeing Company business plan resulted in the surplus of approximately 45 acres of land by 2004. The first step toward transition of an area used for industrial manufacturing for over sixty years into an urban mixed -use neighborhood had been taken. (Note: For a discussion of trends in residential land use, see the Housing Element of this Plan] Commercial Corridors: Due to relatively low land cost, it is expected that the low intensity, suburban -type growth pattern seen along Renton's commercial corridors will likely continue, at least until land values rise. Evidence of this development pattern can be seen along NE 4'e Street. Strip commercial is another common result of low intensity Page 6 of 13 Page 7 of 13 development, especially along principal and major arterial routes; one example is along both sides of Benson Road south of Carr/SE 176th. Unfortunately this development pattern carries economic and environmental costs to the entire City. Economically there is a cost for the extra driving required for work and personal trips. In terms of environmental costs there is the declining air quality from automobile emissions, inefficient land use, and disruptions to existing neighborhoods. Institutions: The expansion of the Valley Medical Center is expected to continue, although like Renton Technical College, available land is limited. As both of these institutional uses grow to serve the region, they will need to expand beyond their current boundaries into surrounding neighborhoods. Industrial: Industrial employment, especially manufacturing, is declining nation-wide. In the Puget Sound region, while the proportion of jobs in the industrial sector is projected to decline, the number of manufacturing jobs in this area is expected to remain relatively stable, at least through the year 2020. While The Boeing Company has largely consolidated existing operations at the Renton Plant onto less space, any change that would reduce their industrial workforce could have a significant impact on this sector in the local area, if not the region. In Renton, commercial uses and services were adversely affected by the downturn in the information technology industry in the late 1990s. The biggest impact of this event however, was on office vacancies, which rose significantly and, at mid -decade, were just starting to turn around.. This situation slowed the demand for office and service uses which until then was a healthy indicator of the regional, and local, shift from an industrial base to a service base. In Renton the most noticeable changes are occurring in the mix and type of industrial activities within the City. Most noticeable is a trend away from heavy industrial/manufacturing toward medium and light industrial uses. Although manufacturing is expected to remain stable and industrial jobs are expected to decline, the number of fight and medium industrial jobs in wholesale/transportation/communications/ utilities is projected to nearly double in the Renton area through 2020. Renton sees itself as an ideal market area for uses based on the biotechnology industry. In addition to Renton, several Puget Sound Region urban areas are competing for this niche market. A second trend is a blurring of land use category descriptions as technology changes the way work is done and more activities include office and computer components. This change is manifested by an increase in the mixes of uses, either within one company or within one building or complex. For example, many businesses are constellations of light industrial, manufacturing, research and development, and office uses. The ideal situation, in terms of regional needs (reduction of traffic on arterials), would add residential uses to that mix. Changes are expected to occur in Renton's employment areas incrementally over a long period of time. Some industrial areas, such as the Boeing Renton Plant in North Renton, are now being redeveloped into other uses, but in some cases inadequate infrastructure or high cost of the cleanup of contaminants on the site may limit redevelopment. in other cases, viable industrial uses exist on a site and will continue to operate for several years, but property owners may anticipate a change in use over the long term. For example, both the Old Stoneway Cement Plant and Barbee Mill sites have submitted proposals for fixture projects mixing office and residential uses. Although the rate of change in industrial lands is slow it is significant because if too much land is converted to non- industrial uses, it could have a detrimental effect on retaining the industrial base. The industrial area of the Valley is not expected to change in either use or size in the near term. Schools: Multiple use of school facilities has been a trend that may continue as long as security does not become an insurmountable issue. Following its peak in 1970, Renton School District enrollment declined at the rate of of 15% during the 1970's and 100/. during the 1980's. Enrollment increased, however between 1990 and 2000, by 18 percent. Although school district boundaries are not affected by annexations, projections anticipate larger enrollments and an increased need for facilities in the district based on increased birth rates for the population in general. Religious Centers: The trend over the past few decades has been for religious groups to provide more services to their members and the public at large. These services require additional land and facilities including that for schools, gymnasiums, offices, parking, and social services. Hours of worship, typically on the weekend, have expanded to include other activities on weekdays and evenings. As a result these facilities are having a greater impact on adjacent neighborhoods and the existing infrastructure. Open Space: Renton has an ambitious open space/greenway acquisition program within the Department of Community Services. The program's main goals are to preserve, protect, and enhance the natural areas in an urban environment and to ensure public access to these areas with limited development and disturbances. Many of the sites will remain relatively undisturbed, while wildlife and habitat areas that are less &agile will be more developed with park and recreation facilities and allow greater public access. As the City of Renton has grown, portions of the City that have naturally occurring hazardous features were passed over for land more easily developed. Now, however, with the amount of easily developable land diminishing, the critical areas are becoming more attractive for urban uses. Annexation: The City has historically undertaken annexation in response to requests from local property owners. There are three types of annexations that may be initiated by property owners or by the City: 1) annexation of large, undeveloped parcels that can now be provided with City of Renton utility service; 2) annexation of smaller infill parcels that are already developed at urban densities, but lack urban levels of services such as sewer, and 3) annexation of commercial and/or residential neighborhoods that have already developed in King County to county standards. Transportation: There is one unchanging transportation trend within the region: traffic is increasing. Several factors are responsible for this: the growth in population, jobs and housing; an increase in people commuting within the region and making longer trips; the location of employment and price of housing, which influences the length and type of trip Page 8 of 13 Page 9 of 13 made; new housing development that is occurring on vacant land in outlying parts of the metropolitan area rather than on land closer to traditional urban centers (again, a function of the cost of housing and its relationship to the scale of wages; and the relocation of employment areas to suburban areas (frequently a function of land and transportation costs). The cumulative effect of all of these factors is more cars on the road and greater traffic congestion. Airport: The Renton Municipal Airport is a heavily used facility and demand on the airport continues to increase steadily. This is primarily due to the Airport's function as a "reliever" facility for air traffic from the SeattlefTacoma Airport. The other nearby reliever airport, `Boeing Field" (the King County International Airport), is frequently unavailable because if is functioning at about 98 percent capacity. An additional factor is the increase in the number of small private planes and corporate jets and the closure of other general aviation airports in the region such as those that were at Bellevue, Issaquah, and Kent. In addition, there is increased activity at the Will Rogers / Wiley Post Memorial Seaplane Base due to closure of similar facilities elsewhere in the region. The expected trend is continued increase in demand at the Airport. This demand may be balanced, somewhat, by a corresponding decrease in Airport use by The Boeing Company as it changes the nature of its business in Renton. For example, 2004 saw the closing of the Boeing 757 production line. Since the Renton Airport is the exiting mechanism for Boeing aircraft, following assembly, this change and other Boeing corporate changes will undoubtedly affect the Airport. The timing of anticipated changes, however, remains unknown to the City. Public Facilities: Public facilities are not measured by "trends" so much as public will and available financing. In Renton, the late 1990s and early part of the next decade saw a significant increase in the inventory of major pubic facilities. These include the development of a "central park" (the Piazza in downtown), a public parking garage, a transit center, a performing arts center, a skateboard park, and a new public water park. PROJECTIONS Trends are identified for the purpose of extrapolating them into projections of the future. Although trends are continuously affected by external factors beyond the control of government, there is still a need to evaluate trends in order to both measure current effectiveness of government policy and have indicators that policy adjustments may be necessary. Population Although the population of Renton grew 20 percent in the decade of the `90s, that was actually a decreased rate from the 1980s, which saw the City's population increase by 36 percent2. The 2001-2022 Household Growth Target for the City of Renton is 6,198 (households to be accommodated by 2022). The decrease in the rate of population growth is reflected in the revision of this number, down from the original 1992-2012 Growth Target of 8,960'. [For additional information on residential growth and housing, see the Housing Element of this Plan-] Population growth is directly tied to employment, partially because the number of those entering the workforce fluctuates as the birthrate goes up or down almost two decades earlier. Employment In 1990, it was estimated that the number of jobs in the City of Renton (48,602) would increase, by 27,300 by the year 2010. What actually happened was that employment in Renton dropped in the first half of the decade by almost 20 percent. Although those lost jobs were regained and job growth grew somewhat during the latter half of the decade, another downturn between 2000 and 2002 resulted in a loss of about 6 percent of the 2000 total. Although there are signs that the economy is improving, jobs would have to increase by about 32 percent by 2010 to meet the projection made in 1990. In a relatively small city, such as Renton, where there are a few large employers, such as Boeing, the employment rates are subject to wide fluctuations. In order to get a sense of the long-term projection of employment growth, it may be valuable to look at what is expected to occur on a larger scale. The average annual growth rate between 1970 and 2003, statewide, was 2.4 percent. It is expected that this rate will decrease to about 1.1 percent for the years 2003 to 2030. It is predicted that a higher rate, 1.4 percent will occur from 2003 to 2010, then that rate will slow to about 0.9 percent between 2010 and 203013. The reasons for this decline may be seen locally as well as on a larger scale. The population is aging and birth rates are declining. There are possibilities that the rate could be influenced by factors such as a workforce made huger by a greater number of immigrants, should immigration regulations be relaxed, or by workers staying in the workforce beyond the traditional retirement age range of 62 to 65. The latter situation may be caused by disincentives to retirement caused by changes in pension plans or an increase in the Social Security retirement age and other changes to that program. Originally, it was expected that King County employment growth targets for the City of Renton would be lower than growth forecasts because the Countywide Planning Policies direct job growth from non -urban center areas into urban centers and Renton's urban center was considered almost totally built out. Approximately 4,000 fewer jobs than preliminary growth targets were expected to be accommodated in the City. However, changes in the Boeing Company business plan and subsequent amendments to the Comprehensive Plan that would allow much more intense land use in the Urban Center has changed that condition. Pace 10 of 13 Page 11 of 13 Nevertheless, the decrease in the employment rate that is expected state-wide in the coming decades is an indicator that a similar situation will be experienced in Renton, although the numbers will be higher. The situation may be typified by the terms, "growing, but sluggish economy." A goal will be to ensure that the availability of land for housing remains high enough so that as the employment rate increases at whatever rate is seen, the cost of housing workers will stay within the range of affordability. Page 12 of 13 References 1. Renton_ Where the Water Took Wing, David M. Buerge 2. "The 2003 King County Annual Growth Report," Office of Management and Budget 3. "The Changing Face of Renton," City of Renton, Department of Community Services, Human Services Division Washington State, Office of Financial Management 4. City of Renton, Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning 5. Renton Chamber of Commerce 6. King County, Office of Management and Budget and King County, Department of Assessments 7. `Benchmark Report, September 2004," Transportation and Environment, King County, Office of Management and Budget "The 2004 Long -Term Economic and Labor Force Forecast for Washington," Washington State, Employment Security Department and the Office of Financial Management Page 13 of 13 ATTACHMENT B Vision The Vlsion for the City is simply stated — "Renton — The center of opportunity in the Puget Sound Region where businesses and families thrive." These few words are intended to provide a representation of how the City views itself at the present time and into the future. The words communicate both truths about and hopes for the City of Renton. The Vision words stand for much more — • A community that is healthy and safe, that has cohesive, well -established neighborhoods and a growing diversity of housing to match the diversity of the population with its various needs and wants • A working town with a full spectrum of employment opportunities for all economic segments, regardless of education, age, gender, or ethnic origin • A regional center for active and passive recreation that features access for all to a healthy river, a clean lake, and clear mountain views to enhance the experience Renton has a city government, business community, and citizens infused with a passionate belief that it is the best place to be. They also have the will, desire, and resources to nurture the qualities that make it that and to make it even better in the future. That is the Vision. The Renton MissiO states, unequivocally, the responsibility of the City, "in partnership with residents, businesses, and schools" to take the steps necessary to fulfill the Vision. These include: • Providing a healthy, welcoming atmosphere where citizens choose to live, raise families, and take pride in their community, • Promoting planned growth and economic vitality, • Creating a positive work environment, and • Meeting service demands through innovation and commitment to excellence. The Business Plan Goal& with the Vision and Mission, form the basis for City objectives and policies. The Goals are adopted annually by the City Council. Each year objectives and implementing policies of the Comprehensive Plan are checked against current goals and objectives. The resulting adjustments are formed into annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Current policies of the Comprehensive Plan direct future growth to the Urban Center, the core of an economically healthy, working city, and to mixed -use areas created outside of Page I of 3 Revised 8/31/05 the downtown. Although densities of development are based on user preference and market factors, policies encourage maximum land efficiency, even outside the Urban Center, and strive for development that is more intense than typical "suburban" prototypes. Ideally, the mixed -use areas will result in a reduction of transportation impacts within the City by allowing residents to work and shop close to where they live, in both new and well -established neighborhoods, thereby providing alternatives to single -occupant vehicles, and maintaining a balance between parking supply and demand. To further the goal of a balance between single- and multi -family housing, there is an objective to increase the supply of single-family housing through infill development. Some of this single-family infill will occur in newly annexed areas of the City, as a way to meet the desired single/multi-family housing mix and provide efficient urban services. There is, however, a corresponding objective to restrict expansion of traditional multi- family housing in outlying areas and channel mixed-use/multi-family into the downtown, South Lake Washington, and the Highlands. By this means, sufficient land capacity to accommodate future growth, including Renton's share of projected regional housing needs, will be ensured while maintaining the quality of life in both new and established neighborhoods. A significant characteristic of the neighborhoods of Renton is their multi -level diversity. Most neighborhoods include households that vary from one another in age range or generation, economic level, and place of origin or nationality. In order to respect and protect this quality, the City must allow for a full range of housing types to accommodate the diverse population, from larger, "move up" homes to smaller scale single-family, multi -family, and condominium developments, as well as to traditional single-family houses. A goal is to enhance the present character of the City and improve the quality of fife. This must be done on several levels. On a community level, City policies support activities that strengthen neighborhood cohesiveness. The energy of a neighborhood that strives for a greater "sense of community" by meeting and working together can lead to amenities that make the area more attractive or improve its function as a neighborhood center. On a project level, a high standard of design is a function of development standards. On the broadest level, the City policies ensure that urbanization, economic development, and natural area protection are balanced. The unique setting of the City of Renton was recognized as "advantageous" from its earliest days. Its situation on the shore of Lake Washington, its hilltop views of the expanses of the lake, Mt. Rainier, the Cascades and Olympic Mountains, tree shrouded slopes, natural wildlife corridors, valley neighborhoods, and the clear water of the Cedar River and the many creeks and streams that run through the City are deeply appreciated by its residents. There is an abiding commitment to protect, restore, and enhance Paee 2 of 3 Revised 8/31105 environmental quality within the City. Likewise, there is a desire to ensure quality parks and adequate open space within this environment to meet the recreational needs of residents. It is understood that, with other factors, the quality of the environment is dependent on the reliability and efficiency of existing utility systems, in order to protect the public health and safety and minimize impacts. High levels of service are maintained, while the cost of implementation is shared in an equitable manner. Basic to Renton's Vision is the concept that urban living provides both choice and balanced opportunities for residents; employment and housing, recreation and religion, goods and services, all available in the community. To this end, the City has a responsibility to ensure availability of adequate land capacity so that both the employment and economic base can be expanded and diversified. Policies encourage expansion of development in the Valley and redevelopment within the Urban Center to broaden the City's employment and economic base. Fundamental to the Vision is a revitalized Downtown Core, within the Urban Center, that functions as a living / working / entertainment area for both the community as a whole and for a "24 hour Downtown population." The City will continue to work to bring a balance of uses, consisting of retail and other commercial, office, light industrial, and residential into the Downtown. Redevelopment of the south Lake Washington neighborhood, within the "Urban Center — North," will contribute to the renewed vitality of the Downtown Core. The Urban Center - North, used for heavy industrial manufacturing and associated parking for more than 60 years, offers the potential for an expanded Urban Center that will become a regional focus. The City of Renton's Vision is ambitious and far-sighted. It is the underlying structure for policies that strengthen the character of a City that entered its second century with renewed energy, ready to capitalize on fresh opportunities. ATTACHMENT C LAND USE ELEMENT GOALS 1. Plan for future growth of the Urban Area based on regionally developed growth forecasts, adopted growth targets, and land capacity as determined through implementation of the Growth Management Act. 2. Minimize risk associated with potential aviation incidents on the ground and for aircraft occupants. 3. Actively pursue annexations. 4. Maintain the City's natural and cultural history by documenting and appropriately recognizing its historic and/or archaeological sites. 5. Pursue the transition of non -conforming uses and structures to encourage more conforming uses and development patterns. 6. Develop a system of facilities that meet the public and quasi -public service needs of present and future employees. 7. Maintain the City's agricultural and mining resources as part of Renton's cultural history. 8. Promote new development and neighborhoods in the City that: a) Contribute to a strong sense of community and neighborhood identity; b) Are walkable places where people can shop, play, and get to work without always having to drive; c) Are developed at densities sufficient to support public transportation and make efficient use of urban services and infrastructure; d) Offer a variety of housing types for a population diverse in age, income, and lifestyle; e) Are varied or unique in character; f) Support "grid" and "flexible grid" street and pathway patterns where appropriate; g) Are visually attractive, safe, and healthy environments in which to live; h) Offer connection to the community instead of isolation; and i) Provide a sense of home. 9. Develop well-balanced attractive, convenient, robust commercial office, office, and residential development within designated Centers serving the City and the region. Page 3 of 3 Page I of 70 10. Support existing businesses and provide an energetic business environment for new commercial activity providing a range of service, office, commercial, and mixed use residential uses that enhance the City's employment and tax base along arterial boulevards and in designated development areas. 11. Achieve a mix of land uses including industrial, high technology, office, and commercial activities in Employment Areas that lead to economic growth and a strengthening of Renton's employment base. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 of 70 Page 3 of 70 I. REGIONAL GROWTH POLICIES Goal: Plan for future growth of the Urban Area based on regionally developed growth forecasts, adopted growth targets, and land capacity as determined through implementation of the Growth Management Act. Discussion: "Capacity" is the room for growth provided by the plan. Targets are the politically determined share of growth assigned to each community in the region through the Countywide Planning Policies. Forecasts are the expected growth in the City based on regional employment and population modeling. The objective of this plan is to appropriately analyze regionally generated estimates of both forecast growth and targets and align those estimates with Renton's desire for economic growth and development. Renton has the local land use authority to provide sufficient capacity to meet and exceed both targets and forecast growth. Excess capacity can encourage sprawl and discourage redevelopment, while insufficient capacity can make it more difficult for the market to work. The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan should provide sufficient direction to achieve a balance between excessive and insufficient capacity, in order to avoid difficulty in implementing the Plan. Objective LU-A: Plan for future urban development in the Renton Urban Growth Area (UGA) including the existing City and the unincorporated areas identified in Renton's Potential Annexation Areas (PAA). Policy LU-1. Continue to refine the boundary of the Urban Growth Area (UGA) in cooperation with King County, based on the following criteria: 1) The UGA provides adequate land capacity for forecast growth; 2) Lands within the UGA are appropriate for urban development; and 3) Urban levels of service are required for existing and proposed land uses. Policy LU-2. Designate Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs) as those portions of unincorporated King County outside the existing City limits, but within the Urban Growth Area, where: 1) Renton can logically provide urban services over the planning period; 2) Land use patterns support implementation of Renton's Urban Center objectives; and 3) Development meets overall standards for quality identified for city neighborhoods. Policy LU-3. Provide for land use planning and an overall growth strategy for both the City and land in the designated PAA as part of Renton's regional growth policies. Discussion: The Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies establish urban growth areas where urban levels of growth will occur within the subsequent 21-year period. These areas include existing cities and unincorporated areas. Within the Urban Growth Area, the Potential Annexation Area (PAA) is designated for future municipal expansion and governance. Policies guiding annexation and provision of services within the PAA are also located in the annexation portion of the Land Use Element; Utilities Element; Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Element and Transportation Element. Objective LU-B: Evaluate and implement growth targets consistent with the Growth Management Act and Countywide Planning Policies. Policy LU-4. Adopt the following growth targets for the period from 2001 to 2022, consistent with the targets adopted for the region by the Growth Management Planning Council for the 2002 Renton City limits and Potential Annexation Areas: I) City of Renton Housing: 6,198 units 2) City of Renton Jobs: 27,597 jobs 3) Potential Annexation Area Housing 1,976 units 4) Potential Annexation Area Jobs: 458 jobs Policy LU-5. Amend growth targets as annexation occurs to transfer a proportionate share of Potential Annexation Area targets into Renton's targets. Policy LU-6. Monitor targets through the City's Outcome Management evaluation process. Objective LU-C: Ensure sufficient land capacity to accommodate forecast housing and job growth and targets mandated by the Growth Management Act for the next twenty-one years (2001-2022). Policy LU-7. Plan for residential and employment growth based on growth targets established in the Countywide Planning Policies, as a minimum. (See Housing Element Goals and Capacity section and Capital Facilities Element, Policy CFP-1 and Growth Projection section. Policy LU-8. Provide sufficient land, appropriately zoned, so capacity exceeds targets by at least twenty percent (20%). Policy LU-9. Encourage infill development as a means to increase capacity for single- family units within the existing city limits. Policy LU-10. Use buildable lands data and market analysis to establish adopted capacity for either jobs or housing within each adopted zoning classification. Policy LU-11. Minimum density requirements shall be established to ensure that land development practices result in an average development density in each land use Page 4 of 70 Page 5 of 70 designation sufficient to meet adopted growth targets and create greater efficiency in the provision of urban services. Policy LU-12. Minimum density requirements should: 1) Be based on net density; 2) Not be applied to lots created after 1995 of less than one-half acre in size; 3) Not be required of individual portions or lots within the project, 4) May be reduced due to lot configuration, lack of access, or physical constraints; and 5) Not be applied to construction of a single dwelling unit on a pre-existing legal lot or renovation of existing structures. Policy LU-13. Phasing, shadow -platting, or land reserves should be used to ensure that minimum density can eventually be achieved within proposed developments. Adequate access to potential future development on the site must be ensured. Proposed development should not preclude future development. Policy LU-14. Parking should not be considered as a land reserve for future development, except within the Urban Center. Policy LU-15. Amend capacity estimates as annexation and re -zonings occur. Objective LU-D: Maintain a high ratio of jobs to housing in Renton. Policy LU-16. Future residential and employment growth within Renton's planning area should meet the goal of 2 jobs per 1 housing unit. Policy LU-17. Sufficient quantities of land should be designated to accommodate the desired single family/multi-family mix outside the Urban Center, and provide for commercial and industrial uses necessary to provide for expected job growth. Policy LU-18. Small-scale home occupations that provide opportunities for people to work in their homes should be allowed in residential areas. Standards should govern the design, size, intensity, and operation of such uses to ensure their compatibility with residential uses. Discussion: The ratio of new jobs to new housing units will affect the future character of the City. Renton currently is an employment center with a high jobs/housing ratio characterized by a high level of day -time activity, a high demand for infrastructure, a high tax base, and a high level of commuter traffic. Renton's current ratio of jobs to housing units is roughly 2.1 jobs per 1 housing unit. Within King County, the overall ratio is about 1.5 jobs per 1 housing unit. Forecasts from the Puget Sound Regional Council indicate that there will be an even greater number of new jobs within Renton than new housing over the next 20 years. This will increase the discrepancy between jobs and housing units within the City. However, the number of housing units in the unincorporated areas within Renton's Potential Annexation Area are expected to grow faster than jobs so that the balance of jobs to housing will be maintained within the City limits and the Potential Annexation Areas. Page 6 of 70 Page 7 of 70 II. AIRPORT AIRPORT COMPATIBLE LAND USE POLICIES Goal: Minimize risk associated with potential aviation incidents on the ground and for aircraft occupants. Discussion: In order to meet a mandate of the Growth Management Act, the City of Renton has developed a set of objectives and policies to address land use compatibility between the Renton Municipal Airport and an area of the City known as the Airport Influence Area (see RMC 4-3-020). Renton's approach to planning for minimization of risk associated with potential aviation incidents was to analyze four primary categories of aviation operations in relation to land use compatibility. The categories used are, 1) general aviation safety, 2) airspace protection, 3) aviation noise, and 4) overflight. A "compatibility objective" was developed for each, with strategies to meet the objective, and measurement criteria to ensure that the objective is met. The objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, with the implementation included in the Development Regulations (RMC 4-3-020) meet the state requirement of GMA and the goal of this section. General Aviation Safety Objective LU-E: Minimize risk associated with potential aviation incidents Policy LU-19. Adopt an airport compatible land use program for the Renton Airport Influence Area, including an Airport Influence Area Map. Policy LU-20. Develop performance -based criteria for land use compatibility with aviation activity. Policy LU-21. In the Airport Influence Area, adopt use restrictions, as appropriate, that meet or exceed basic aviation safety considerations. Airspace Protection Objective LU-F: Reduce obstacles to aviation in proximity to Renton Municipal Airport. Policy LU-22. Require that submittal requirements for proposed land use actions disclose potential conflicts with airspace. Policy LU-23. Provide maximum protection to Renton airspace from obstructions to aviation. Policy LU-24. Prohibit buildings, structures, or other objects from being constructed or altered so as to project or otherwise penetrate the airspace surfaces, except as necessary and incidental to airport operations. Aviation Noise Objective LU-G: Address impacts of aviation noise that is at a level deemed to be a health hazard or disruptive of noise -sensitive activities. Policy LU-25. Prohibit the location of noise -sensitive land uses from areas of high noise levels, defined by the 65 DNL (or higher) noise contour of the Renton Municipal Airport. Policy LU-26. Within the Airport Influence Area require disclosure notice for potential negative impacts from aviation operation and noise, unless mitigated by other measures. Policy LU-27. Residential use and/or density should be limited, within the Runway Protection Zone and the Runway Sideline Zone to reduce negative impacts on residents from aviation operation noise. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption date of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-28. Non-residential use and/or intensity may be limited, if such uses are deemed to be noise sensitive, to reduce negative impacts on users from aviation operation noise. Policy LU-29. Approval of residential land use or other land uses where noise -sensitive activities may occur should require dedication of avigation easements and use of acoustic materials for structures. Policy LU-30. Require master planning of land to increase land use compatibility through sound attenuation in the environment and techniques such as: • Place uses with highest sensitivity to noise at greater distances, in consideration of the factor of distance from the source. • Consider creation of micro -climates to utilize mitigating meteorological conditions (i.e. air temperature, wind direction and velocity). • Create soft ground surfaces, such as vegetative ground cover, rather than hard surfaces. • Provide at appropriate heights, structures, terrain, or other barriers to provide attenuation of sound. Overflight Objective LU-H: In the Airport Influence Area, address impacts of overflight that are disruptive. Page 8 of 70 Page 9 of 70 Policy LU-31. At the time of land use approval (i.e. subdivision of land) avigation easements should be granted to the City in areas of Renton subject to negative aircraft overflight impacts. Policy LU-32. At the time of land use approval (i.e. subdivision of land) deed notices should be recorded in areas of Renton subject to negative aircraft overflight impacts. Policy LU-33. The City should establish a presence on noise -abatement review committees, or similar forums, and request notification of noise -abatement procedures at nearby airports that may have aircraft that impact Renton. Policy LU-34. The City should provide information to Renton citizens of noise complaint procedures to follow for reporting negative impacts from overflights associated with not only Renton Airport, but also Seattle Tacoma International Airport and King County International Airport. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption date of GMA update. III. ANNEXATIONS Goal: Actively pursue annexations. Discussion: The growth of the City through annexation is expected to continue throughout the planning cycle. The policies in this section are intended to guide the annexation process. The City recognizes that fiscal impacts are only one of many criteria to be evaluated, and must be balanced with other annexation policy goals, such as transition to urban land use, protection of sensitive areas, provision of public service, governmental structure, provision of infrastructure, aquifer protection, and community identity. Objective LU-I: Support annexation of county areas that are identified as being within the City of Renton's Potential Annexation Area and can be efficiently provided with infrastructure and City services, are urban separators, or have environmental constraints. Policy LU-35. The City will continue to recognize that it has an inherent interest in future land use decisions affecting its Potential Annexation Area. Policy LU-36. Encourage annexation where the availability of infrastructure and services allow for the development of urban densities. Renton should be the primary service provider of urban infrasfructure and public services in its Potential Annexation Area, provided that the City can offer such services in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Policy LU-37. The highest priority areas for annexation to the City of Renton should be those contiguous with the boundaries of the City such as: 1) Peninsulas and islands of unincorporated land where Renton is the logical service provider, 2) Neighborhoods where municipal services have already been extended; 3) Lands subject to development pressure that might benefit from City Development Standards, 4) Developed areas where urban services are needed to correct degradation of natural resources, such as aquifer recharge areas; 5) Lands that are available for urbanization under county comprehensive plan, zoning, and subdivision regulations; and 6) Developed areas where Renton is able to provide basic urban services and local governance to an existing population. Objective LU-J: Promote annexations that would maintain the quality of life in the re- sultant City of Renton, making the City a good place to work, live, play, shop, and raise families. Policy LU-38. Support annexations that would result in future improvements to City services or eliminate duplication by service providers. Services include water, sanitary sewer, storm water drainage, utility drainage basins, transportation, park and open space, library, and public safety. Page 10 of 70 Page I I of 70 Policy LU-39. Support annexations that complement the jobs and housing goals adopted in the Regional Growth Strategy. Policy LU-40. Support annexations that would simplify governmental structure by consolidating multiple services under a single or reduced number of service providers Policy LU-41. Promote annexations of developed areas with a residential population already using City services or impacting City infrastructure. Policy LU42. Support annexations of lower density areas where it would protect natural resources or provide urban separator areas. Objective LU-K: Create city boundaries through annexations that facilitate the efficient delivery of emergency and public services. Policy LU-43. The proposed annexation boundary should be defined by the following characteristics: 1) Annexation of territory that is adjacent to the existing City limits; in general, the more land adjacent to the City the more favorable the annexation; 2) Inclusion of unincorporated islands and peninsulas; 3) Use of natural or manmade boundaries that are readily identifiable in the field, such as wetlands, waterways, ridges, park property, roads/freeways, and railroads; 4) Inclusion/exclusion of an entire neighborhood, rather than dividing portions of the neighborhood between City and County jurisdictions; and 5) Inclusion of natural corridors either as greenbelts or urban separators between the City and adjacent jurisdictions. Policy LU-49. Annexations should be pursued in areas that lie within existing, emerging, or prospective aquifer recharge zones, that currently or potentially supply domestic water to the City and are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area. Policy LU-50. Zoning should be applied to areas for purposes of resource protection, when appropriate, during the annexation process. Objective LU-M: Promote a regional approach for development review through the use of interlocal agreements to ensure that land development policies in King County are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies or other City of Renton development standards. This policy should be implemented within five years of the adoption date of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-51. Urban development within Renton's Potential Annexation Area should not occur without annexation unless there is an interlocal agreement with King County defining land use, zoning, annexation phasing, urban services, street and other design standards, and impact mitigation requirements. Policy LU-52. Long-range planning and the development of capital improvement programs for transportation, storm water, water, and sewer services should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions, special districts, and King County. Policy LU-53. Interlocal agreements with other jurisdictions should be pursued to develop solutions to regional concerns including, but not limited to water, sanitary sewer, storm water drainage, utility drainage basins, transportation, park and open space, development review, and public safety. Policy LU-44. Existing land uses, development, and redevelopment potential should be considered when evaluating a proposed annexation. Objective LU-N: Provide full and complete evaluation of annexation proposals by Policy LU-45. Commercial uses that do not conform to Renton's land use plan should be relevant departments and divisions upon the submission of the annexation proposal. encouraged to transition into conforming uses or to relocate to areas with compatible land Policy LU-54. Appropriate zoning districts should be designated for property in an use designations. Illegal uses not listed under King County zoning should be required to annexation proposal. Zoning in the annexation territory should be consistent with the cease and desist upon annexation. comprehensive plan land use designations. Policy LU-46. Annexation proposals should include areas that would result in City Policy LU-55. Larger annexations should be encouraged, when appropriate, in order to control over land uses along major entrance corridors to the City ("Gateways"). realize efficiencies in the use of City resources. Policy LU-47. Boundaries of individual annexations will not be reconsidered to Policy LU-56. Annexations should be expanded if they include areas surrounded by the exclude reluctant property owners, if the annexation is consistent with land use, City on three or more sides or if they include properties with recorded covenants to environmental protection policies, and the efficient delivery of services. annex. Objective LU-L: Protect the environmental quality of Renton by annexing lands where future development and land use activity could otherwise adversely impact natural and urban systems. Policy LU-48. Shoreline Master Program land use designations, including those for associated wetlands, should be established during the annexation process. Policy LU-57. The City should respond to community initiatives and actively assist owners and residents with initiating and completing the annexation process. Policy LU-58. The City should ensure that property owners and residents in and around the affected area(s) are notified of the obligations and requirements that may be imposed upon them as a result of annexation. Policy LU-59. The City should work with potential annexation proponents to develop acceptable annexation boundaries. Page 12 of 70 Page 13 of 70 Policy LU-60. The City should conduct a fiscal impact assessment of the costs to provide service and of the tax revenues that would be generated in each area proposed for IV. HISTORICAL AND ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES annexation. Goal: Maintain the City', natural and cultural history by documenting and appropriately recognizing its historic and/or archaeological sites. Discussion: Renton has a rich and interesting history as a community. It was the site of an established Native American settlement and changed through the years of early European immigration into a pioneer town. The City incorporated in 1901 and later became a major regional employment center and residential area. The following policies are intended to guide efforts to recognize and integrate Renton's past into future development as the City evolves into a dynamic urban community. Objective LU-O: Communicate Renton's history by protecting historic and archaeological sites and structures when appropriate and as opportunities arise. Policy LU-61. Historic resources should continue to be identified and mapped within the City as an on -going process. Policy LU-62. Natural and cultural resources should be identified by project proponents when applying for land use approval, as part of the application submitted for review. Policy LU-63. Potentially adverse impacts on cultural resources deemed to be significant should be mitigated as a condition of project approval. Implementation of this policy should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-64. The City should work cooperatively with King County by exchanging resource information pertaining to natural and cultural resources. Policy LU-65. Historical and archaeological sites, identified as significant by the City of Renton, should be preserved and/or incorporated into development projects. Policy LU-66. Downtown buildings and site development proposals should be encouraged to incorporate displays about Renton's history, including prominent families and individuals, businesses, and events associated with downtown's past. Implementation of this policy should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Page 14 of 70 Page 15 of 70 NON -CONFORMING USE Goal: Pursue the transition of non -conforming uses and structures to encourage more conforming uses and development patterns. Discussion: As a community grows, changes in land use policies sometimes result in "non -conforming uses" as remnants of an earlier land use pattern. Some of these non- conforming uses can retain a viable economic life for long periods of time and even become desirable reminders of the evolution of the City. These policies are intended to guide decision -making about non -conforming uses and structures in the context of current land use policy. Objective LU-P: Evaluate requests for rebuilding of non -conforming uses beyond normal maintenance where they can be made more conforming and are compatible with their surroundings. Policy LU-67. Encourage compatibility between non -conforming uses and structures and conforming uses in neighborhoods that have significant numbers of non -conforming uses. Implementation of this policy should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-68. Encourage developments that increase the number of conforming uses and structures. Policy LU-69. Transition of uses and structures from non -conforming to those that conform to zoning and development standards should be implemented in a manner that recognizes the overall character of the neighborhood. Implementation of this policy should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-70. Evaluate permits for non -conforming uses, based on the following criteria. 1) Relationship of the existing non -conforming use or structure to its surroundings; 2) The compatibility of the non -conforming use with its context and other uses in the area, 3) Demonstrated community need for the use at its present location; 4) Over -concentration of the use within the City or within the area; 5) Suitability of the existing location; 6) Demonstration that the use has not resulted in undue adverse effects on adjacent properties from noise, traffic, glare, vibration, etc., (i.e. does not exceed normal levels in these areas emanating from surrounding permitted uses); 7) Whether the use was associated with a historical event or activity in the community and as a result has historical significance; 8) Whether the use provides substantial benefit to the community because of either the employment of a large number of people in the community or whether it generates considerable revenues to the City; and 9) Whether retention of the use due to current market conditions would not impede or delay the implementation of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Objective LU-Q: Ensure that the effects of non -conforming structures on character of the conforming patterns of Renton's neighborhoods are minimized. Policy LU-71. Evaluate applications to repair or expand non -conforming structures based on the following factors: 1) Whether it represents a unique regional or national architectural style or an innovation in architecture, use of materials, or functional arrangement, and/or is one of the few remaining examples of such a style or innovation, 2 Whether it is part of a unified streetscape of similar structures that is unlikely to be replicated, unless the subject structure is rebuilt per, or similar to, its original plan; 3) Whether redevelopment of the site with a conforming structure is unlikely; and 4) The structure has been well -maintained and is not considered to be a threat to the public health, welfare, or safety, or it could be retrofitted so as not to pose such a threat. Page 16 of 70 Page 17 of 70 VL PUBLIC FACILITIES Goal: Develop a system of facilities that meet the public and quasi -public service needs of present and future employees. Discussion: The purpose of these policies is to address the aspect of a public/quasi public use that is not addressed in the pertinent land use policies. Public facilities, also includes quasi -public uses such as cultural and religious facilities. Facilities discussed in this section vary widely in their size, function, service area, and impacts. For that reason, these policies are aimed at addressing the generic impacts of all of the facilities and the specific impacts of each. (Renton Technical College and Valley Medical Center are also addressed in the Commercial Corridor section of the Land Use Element.) Objective LU-R: Locate and plan for public facilities in ways that benefit a broad range of potential public uses. Policy LU-72. Facilities should be located within walking distance of an existing or planned transit stop. Policy LU-73. Primary vehicular access to sites should be from principal or minor arterial streets. Policy LU-74. Internal site circulation should be primarily pedestrian -oriented. Policy LU-75. Manage public lands to protect and preserve the public trust. Policy LU-76. Sites that are underused or developed with obsolete public uses should be considered for another public use prior to changing uses. Policy LU-77. Surplus public sites should be considered for alternative types of public use prior to sale or lease. Policy LU-78. A public involvement process should be established to review proposals to change uses of surplus public properties. Policy LU-79. Guide and modify development of essential public facilities to meet Comprehensive Plan policies and to mitigate impacts and costs to the City. Policy LU-80. Use public processes and create criteria to identify essential public facilities. Public processes should include notification, hearings, and citizen involvement. Criteria should be developed to review and assess proposals for public facilities. Objective LU-S: Site and design municipal facilities to provide the most efficient and convenient service for people while minimizing adverse impacts on surrounding uses. Policy LU-81. Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, trails, art work) should be incorporated into municipal projects. Policy LU-82. Municipal government functions that are people -intensive should be centrally located in or near the Urban Center. Policy LU-83. Fire stations should be located on principal or minor arterials. Policy LU-84. Future fire stations should be sited central to their service area with as few barriers as possible in order to achieve best possible response times. Policy LU-85. Land for future fire stations should be acquired in advance in areas where the greatest amount of development is anticipated. Policy LU-86. Site and building design of police facilities providing direct service to the general public should be easily accessible. Policy LU-87. Major functions of the police should be centralized in or near the Urban Center. Policy LU-88. Satellite police facilities may be located outside of the Urban Center. Objective LU-T: Site and design regional facilities to provide the most efficient and convenient service for people while minimizing the adverse impacts on adjacent uses and the City Urban Center. Policy LU-89. Regional facilities that provide services on -site to the public on a daily basis (i.e. office uses) should be located in the City's Urban Center. Policy LU-90. Siting of regional facilities that are specialized (e.g. landfills, maintenance shops) or serve a limited segment of the population (e.g. justice centers) should rely more strongly on the special locational needs of the facility and the compatibility of the facility with surrounding uses. Objective LU-U: Preserve the cultural amenities and heritage of Renton. Policy LU-91. The downtown library should continue to be the main facility for the City. Policy LU-92. When branch libraries are developed, they should be located to provide convenient access to a majority of thew users. Policy LU-93. Future branch libraries and other satellite services may be located in mixed -use developments to serve concentrations of users in those areas. Page 18 of 70 Page 19 of 70 Objective LU-V: Assure adequate land and infrastructure at appropriate locations for development and expansion of facilities to serve the educational needs of area residents and protect adjacent uses from impacts of these more intensive uses. Policy LU-94. Post secondary (beyond high school) and other regional educational facilities that require sites larger than five acres should be located in the Employment Area — Industrial, Employment Area — Valley, Commercial/Office/Residential, or the Urban Center designations. Policy LU-95. Alternative funding sources (e.g. impact fees) should be explored for facilities necessitated by new development. Policy LU-96. Schools in residential neighborhoods should consider mitigating adverse impacts to the surrounding area in site planning and operations. Policy LU-97. The City and the school district should jointly develop multiple -use facilities (e.g. playgrounds, sports fields) whenever practical. Policy LU-98. Community use of school sites and facilities for non -school activities should be encouraged. Policy LU-99. Facilities that are planned for closure, should be considered for potential public use before being sold for private development. Policy LU-100. Elementary schools should be located near a collector arterial street. Policy LU-101. Safe pedestrian access to schools should be promoted (e.g. through pedestrian linkages, safety features) through the design of new subdivisions and roadway improvements. Policy LU-102. Vehicular access to middle schools, senior high schools and other large scale facilities (e.g. bus maintenance shops, sports facilities) should be from arterial streets. Objective LU-W: Assure that adequate land and infrastructure are available for the development and expansion of facilities to serve the health care needs of the area. Policy LU-103. Health and/or medical facilities larger than five acres should be located in portions of the Commercial Corridor designation mapped with Commercial Office zoning, Employment Area — Valley, Commercial/Office/Residential or the Urban Centers designations. Smaller scale facilities should locate in the Commercial Arterial portions of Commercial Corridor. Objective LU-X: Site religious and ancillary facilities in a manner that provides convenient transportation access and minimizes their adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. Policy LU-104. When locating in predominantly residential areas, religious facilities should be on the periphery of the residential area rather than the interior. Policy LU-105. Parking should be provided on -site and buffered from adjacent uses. Policy LU-106. Large-scale facilities should be encouraged to locate contiguous to an existing or planned transit route. Policy LU-107. Religious facilities should be located on and have direct access to either an arterial or collector street. Objective LU-Y: Accommodate large commercial recreation that depends on open land and is intended to serve consumer demands within a region. Policy LU-108. Commercial recreational uses should be located contiguous to a principal arterial in areas with immediate access to an interstate or a state route. Policy LU-109. Commercial recreational uses should be located outside of the trade area of other commercial recreational areas offering similar recreational opportunities. Policy LU-110. Vehicular access to a commercial recreational site should be from a principal arterial street with the number of access points minimized. Page 20 of 70 Page 21 of 70 VII. RESOURCE LAND Goal: Maintain the City's agricultural and mining resources as part of Renton's cultural history. Discussion: Renton is an urban community with a rich history based on industrial and agricultural uses that is now transitioning into a vibrant urban center. Some agricultural resource -based uses remain in environmentally sensitive areas of the Potential Annexation Area and in Residential Low Density Designations or on vacant land in commercial areas. Current policies recognize these existing uses and encourage them as cultural resources. Objective LU-Z: Maintain existing commercial and hobby agricultural uses such as small farms, hobby farms, horticulture, beekeeping, kennels, and stables, that are compatible with urban development. Policy LU-111. Prohibit commercial agricultural uses that are industrial or semi - industrial in nature, and create nuisances such as odor or noise that may be incompatible with residential use. Policy LU-112. Limit access of large domestic animals to shorelines and wetlands. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-113. Control impacts of crop and animal raising on surface and ground water Policy LU-114. Encourage public and private recreational uses in agricultural areas. Policy LU-115. Allow cultivation and sale of flowers, herbs, vegetables, or similar crops in residential areas, as an accessory use and/or home occupation. Implementation of this policy should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-116. Recognize and allow community gardens on private property, vacant public property, and unused rights -of -ways. Implementation of this policy should occur within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Objective LU-AA: Maintain extractive industries where their continued operation does not impact adjacent residential areas, the City's aquifer, or other critical areas. Policy LU-117. Extractive industries including timber, sand, gravel and other mining within the City's Potential Annexation Area should be mapped and appropriately zoned upon annexation to the City. Policies governing these sites should be consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. Policy LU-118. Mining and processing of minerals and materials should be allowed within the City subject to applicable City ordinances, environmental performance standards. Policy LU-119. Extractive sites, when mined out, should be regraded and restored for future development compatible with land use designations for adjacent sites. Implementing code will be in place within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-120. New plats adjacent to operating extractive sites should carry a notice on the face of the plat specifying the impacts that are expected from the extractive use: potential dust, noise, traffic, light and glare. Policy LU-121. Hours of operation of extractive uses should be based on impacts to adjacent uses. Policy LU-122. The City should apply conditional use permits or other approvals as appropriate for mineral extraction and processing when: 1) The proposed site contains rock, sand, gravel, coal, oil, gas, or other mineral resources, 2) The proposed site is large enough to confine or mitigate all operational impacts, 3) The proposal will allow operation with limited conflicts with adjacent land uses when mitigating measures are applied, and; 4) Roads or rail facilities serving or proposed to serve the site can safely and adequately handle transport of products and are in close proximity to the site. Page 22 of 70 Page 23 of 70 VIII. RESIDENTIAL POLICIES Goal: Promote new development and neighborhoods in the City that: j) Contribute to a strong sense of community and neighborhood identity; k) Are walkable places where people can shop, play, and get to work without always having to drive; 1) Are developed at densities sufficient to support public transportation and make efficient use of urban services and infrastructure; m) Offer a variety of housing types for a population diverse in age, income, and lifestyle; n) Are varied or unique in character, o) Support "grid" and "flexible grid" street and pathway patterns where appropriate; p) Are visually attractive, safe, and healthy environments in which to live; q) Offer connection to the community instead of isolation; and r) Provide a sense of home. Discussion: The purpose of the Residential policies is to provide a Citywide residential growth strategy. The Residential policies address the location of housing development, housing densities, non-residential uses allowed in residential areas, site design, and housing types in neighborhoods. (See Public Facilities Section for policies on schools, churches, and other facilities in residential areas. See Housing Element for policies relating to housing types and neighborhoods and the Community Design Element for policies guiding quality design.) Objective LU-BB: Manage and plan for high quality residential growth in Renton and the Potential Annexation Area that: 1) Supports transit by providing urban densities, 2) Promotes efficient land utilization, and 3) Creates stable neighborhoods incorporating built amenities and natural features. Policy LU-123. Pursue multiple strategies for residential growth including: 1) Development of new neighborhoods on larger land tracts on the hills and plateaus surrounding downtown; 2) Infill development on vacant and underutilized parcels in Renton's established neighborhoods; 3) Multi -family development located in Renton's Urban Center; 4) Infill in existing multi -family areas; and 5) Mixed -use projects and multi -family development in Commercial/Office/Residential and Commercial Corridors Land Use designations. Policy LU-124. Promote the timely and logical progression of residential development. Priority for higher density development should be given to development of land with infrastructure capacity and land located closer to the City's Urban Center. Policy LU-125. Encourage a city-wide mix of housing types including: 1) Large -lot single family; 2) Small -lot single family; 3) Small-scale and large-scale rental and condominium multi -family housing; and 4) Residential/commercial mixed -use development. Objective LU-CC: Maintain the goal of a fifty-fifty ratio of single family to multi- family housing outside of the Urban Center. Policy LU-126. A maximum of fifty percent (50%) of future residential land capacity should occur in multi -family housing in parts of the City and PAA located outside of the Urban Center. Policy LU-127. Infrastructure impacts of the goal of 50/50 ratio of single-family to multi -family outside the Urban Center should be evaluated as part of the City's Capital Improvements program. Policy LU-128. Multi -family unit types are encouraged as part of mixed -use developments in the Urban Center, Center Village, Commercial/Office/Residential, and the Commercial Corridor Land Use designations. Policy LU-129. Small -lot, single-family infill developments and plats should be supported as alternatives to multi -family development to both increase the City's supply of single-family detached housing and provide homeownership opportunities. Policy LU-130. Adopt urban density of at least four (4) dwelling units per net acre for residential uses except in areas with identified and documented sensitive areas and/or areas identified as urban separators. Policy LU-131. Encourage larger lot single-family development in areas providing a transition to the Urban Growth Boundary and King County Rural Designation. The City should discourage more intensive platting patterns in these areas. Policy LU-132. Discourage creation of socio-economic enclaves, especially where lower income units would be segregated within a development. Page 24 of 70 Page 25 of 70 RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: Policies in this section are intended to guide development on land appropriate for a range of low intensity residential and employment where land is either constrained by sensitive areas or where the City has the opportunity to add larger -lot housing stock, at urban densities of 4-du/net acre, to its inventory. Lands that are not appropriate for urban levels of development are designated either Resource Conservation or Residential Low Density Zoning. Lands that either do not have significant sensitive areas, or can be adequately protected by the critical areas ordinance, are zoned Residential 4. Objective LU-DD: Provide for a range of lifestyles and appropriate uses adjacent to and compatible with urban development in areas of the City and Potential Annexation Area constrained by extensive natural features, providing urban separators and/or providing a transition to Rural Designations within King County. Policy LU-133. Identify and map areas of the City where environmentally sensitive areas such as 100-year floodplains, floodways, and hazardous landslide and erosion areas are extensive and the application of critical areas regulations alone is insufficient to guide future development. Policy LU-134. Base development densities should range from 1 home per 10 acres (Resource Conservation) to 1 home per acre (Residential 1) on Residential Low Density (RLD) designated land with significant environmental constraints, including but not limited to: steep slopes, erosion hazard, floodplains, and wetlands or where the area is in a designated Urban Separator. Density should be a maximum of 4-du/net acre (Residential 4) on portions of the Residential Low Density land where these constraints are not extensive and urban densities are appropriate. Policy LU-135. For the purpose of mapping four dwelling units per net acre (4-du/ac) zoned areas as contrasted with lower density Residential I (R-1) and Resource Conservation (RC) areas, the prevalence of significant environmental constraints should be interpreted to mean: 1) Critical areas encumber a significant percentage of the gross area; 2) Developable areas are separated from one another by pervasive critical areas or occur on isolated portions of the site and access limitations exist; 3) The location of the sensitive area results in a non-contiguous development pattern; 4) The area is a designated urban separator; or 5) Application of the Critical Areas Ordinance setbacks/buffers and/or net density definition would create a situation where the allowed density could not be accommodated on the remaining net developable area without modifications or variances to other standards. Implementation of this policy should be phased in within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-136. Rural activities, such as agricultural and animal husbandry, should be allowed. Policy LU-137. Warehousing, outdoor storage, equipment yards, and industrial uses should not be allowed. Where such uses exist as non -conforming uses, measures should be taken to negotiate the transition of these uses as residential redevelopment occurs. Policy LU-138. To provide for more efficient development patterns and maximum preservation of open space, residential development may be clustered and/or lot sizes reduced within allowed density levels in Residential Low Density designations. Implementation of this policy should be phased in within two years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-139. Minimize impacts of animal and crop -raising on adjacent residential uses and critical areas such as wetlands, streams, and rivers. Policy LU-140. Control scale and density of accessory buildings and barns to maintain compatibility with other residential uses. Policy LU-141. Residential Low Density areas may be incorporated into Urban Separators. Policy LU-142. Undeveloped portions of Residential Low Density areas may be considered for designation of trail easements or other public benefits through agreements with private parties. Objective LU-EE: Designate Residential 4 du/acre zoning in those portions of the RLD designation appropriate for urban levels of development by providing suitable environments for suburban and/or estate style, single-family residential dwellings. Policy LU-143. Within the Residential 4 du/acre zoned area allow a maximum density of 4 units per net acre to encourage larger lot development and increase the supply of upper income housing consistent with the City's Housing Element. Policy LU-144. Ensure quality development by supporting site plans and plats that incorporate quality building and landscaping standards. Policy LU-145. Interpret development standards to support projects with higher quality housing by requiring: 1) A variety of compatible housing styles making up block fronts; 2) Additional architectural features such as pitched roofs, roof overhangs, and/or decorative cornices, fenestration and trim; and Page 26 of 70 Page 27 of 70 3) Building modulation and use of durable exterior materials such as wood, masonry, stucco, or brick. Policy LU-146. Interpret development standards to support provision of landscape features as well as innovative site planning. Criteria should include: 1) Attractive residential streetscapes with landscaped front yards that are visible from the street; 2) Landscaping, preferably with drought- resistant evergreen plant materials; 3) Large caliper street trees; 4) Irrigated landscape planting strips; 5) Low -impact development using landscaped buffers, open spaces, and other pervious surfaces; and 6) Significant native tree and vegetation retention and/or replacement. RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: Lands in the Residential Single Family Designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. Policies in this section are to be considered together with the policies in the Regional Growth, Residential Growth Strategy section of the Land Use Element, the Community Design Element, and the Housing Element. Policies are implemented with R-8 zoning. Objective LU-FF: Encourage re -investment and rehabilitation of existing housing, and development of new residential plats resulting in quality neighborhoods that: 1) Are planned at urban densities and implement Growth Management targets, 2) Promote expansion and use of public transportation; and 3) Make more efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per net acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. Policy LU-148. A minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet should be allowed on in -fill parcels of less than one acre (43,560 sq. ft.) in single-family designations. Allow a reduction in lot size to 4,500 square feet on parcels greater than one acre to create an incentive for aggregation of land. The minimum lot size is not intended to set the standard for density in the designation, but to provide flexibility in subdivision/plat design and facilitate development within the allowed density range. Policy LU-149. Lot size should exclude private sidewalks, easements, private road, and driveway easements, except alley easements. Policy LU-150. Required setbacks should exclude public or private legal access areas, established through or to a lot, and parking areas. Policy LU-151. Maximum height of structures should not exceed two (2) stories in single-family residential neighborhoods. Policy LU-152. Single-family lot size, lot width, setbacks, and impervious surface should be sufficient to allow private open space, landscaping to provide buffers/privacy without extensive fencing, and sufficient area for maintenance activities. Policy LU-153. Interpret development standards to support plats designed to incorporate vehicular and pedestrian connections between plats and neighborhoods. Small projects composed of single parcels and/or multiple parcels of insufficient size to provide such connections, should include future street stubs. Future street connections should be clearly identified to notify residents of future roadway connections. Policy LU-154. Interpret development standards to support new plats and infill project designs incorporating street locations, lot configurations, and building envelopes that address privacy and quality of life for existing residents. Policy LU-155. New plats proposed at higher densities than adjacent neighborhood developments may be modified within the allowed density range to reduce conflicts between old and new development patterns. However, strict adherence to older standards is not required. Policy LU-156. Interpret development standards to support projects incorporating site features such as distinctive stands of trees and natural slopes that can be retained to enhance neighborhood character and preserve property values where possible. Replanting should occur where trees are not retained due to safety concerns. Retention of unique site features should be balanced with the objective of investing in neighborhoods within the overall context of the Vision Statement of this Comprehensive Plan. RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The Residential Medium Density designation is intended to create the opportunity for neighborhoods that offer a variety of lot sizes, housing, and ownership options. Residential Medium Density neighborhoods should include a variety of unit types designed to incorporate features from both single-family and multi -family developments, support cost-efficient housing, facilitate infill development, encourage use of transit service, and promote the efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. Objective LU-GG: Designate land for Residential Medium Density (RMD) where access, topography and adjacent land uses create conditions appropriate for a variety of Page 28 of 70 Page 29 of 70 unit types designed to incorporate features from both single-family and multi -family developments, and to support cost-efficient housing, infill development, transit service, and the efficient use of urban services and infrastructure. Policy LU-157. Residential Medium Density designated areas should be zoned for either Residential 10 dwelling units per net acre (R-10), Residential 14 dwelling units per net acre (R-14), or new zoning designations that allow housing in this density range. Policy LU-158. Residential Medium Density neighborhoods may be considered for Residential 10 (R-10) zoning if they meet three of the following criteria: 1) The area already has a mix of small-scale multi -family units or has had long standing zoning for flats or other low -density multi -family use; 2) Development patterns conducive to medium -density development are established; 3) Vacant lots exist or parcels have redevelopment potential for medium -density ill development, 4) The project site is adjacent to major arterial(s) and public transit service is located within'/4 mile; 5) The site can be buffered from existing single-family residential neighborhoods having densities of eight (8) dwelling units or less; or 6) The site can be buffered from adjacent or abutting incompatible uses. Policy LU-159. Areas may be considered for Residential 14 (R-14) Zoning where the site meets the following criteria: 1) Adjacent to major arterial(s); 2) Adjacent to the Urban Center, Highlands Neighborhood Center, or Commercial Corridor designations; 3) Part of a designation totaling over 20 acres (acreage may be in separate ownership) 4) Site is buffered from single-family areas or other existing, potentially incompatible uses; and 5) Development within the density range and of similar unit type is achievable given environmental constraints. Policy LU-160. Support projects that create neighborhoods with diverse housing types that achieve continuity through the organization of roads, sidewalks, blocks, setbacks, community gathering places, and amenity features. Policy LU-161. Support residential development incorporating a hierarchy of streets. Street networks should connect through the development to existing streets, avoid "cul- de-sac" or dead end streets, and be arranged in a grid street pattern (or a flexible grid street system if there are environmental constraints). Policy LU-162. Development densities in the Residential Medium Density designation area should range from seven (7) to eighteen (18) dwelling units per net acre, as specified by implementing zoning. Policy LU-163. For attached or semi -attached development in the R-14 zoned portions of the Residential Medium Density designation, a bonus density of 18 dwelling units per acre should be available, subject to Density Bonus Review and other applicable development conditions. Policy LU-164. When a minimum density is applicable, the minimum development density in the Residential Medium Density designation should be four (4) dwelling units per net acre. Objective LU-HH: Residential Medium Density designations should be areas where creative approaches to housing density can be implemented. Policy LU-165. Provision of small lot, single-family detached unit types, townhouses, and multi -family structures compatible with a single-family character should be allowed and encouraged in the Residential Medium Density designation, provided that density standards can be met (see also the Housing Element for housing types). Policy LU-166. Very small -lot single-family housing, such as cottages, zero -lot line detached, semi-detached, townhouses, and small scale multi -family units should be allowed in the Residential Medium Density designation in order to provide a wide range of housing types. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-167. A range and variety of lot sizes and building densities should be encouraged. Policy LU-168. Residential developments should include public amenities that function as a gathering place within the development and should include features such as a public square, open space, park, civic or commercial uses in the R-14 zone. The central place should include passive amenities such as benches and fountains, and be unified by a design motif or common theme. Policy LU-169. Residential Medium Density site development plans having attached or semi -attached housing types should reflect the following criteria for projects: 1) Parking should be encouraged in the rear or side yards or under the structure; 2) Structures should be located on lots or arranged in a manner to appear like a platted development to ensure adequate light and air, and views (if any) are preserved between lots or structures; 3) Buildings should be massed in a manner that promotes a pedestrian scale with a small neighborhood feeling; 4) Each dwelling unit should have an identifiable entrance and front on streets rather than courtyards and parking lots; Page 30 of 70 Paw 31 of 70 5) Fences may be constructed if they contribute to an open, spacious feeling between units and structures; and 6) Streetscapes should include green, open space for each unit. Policy LU-170. Residential Medium Density development should provide condominium or fee simple homeownership opportunities, as well as rental or lease options. Objective LU-II: Residential Medium Density development should be urban in form and fit into existing residential neighborhoods if developed as infrll projects. Policy LU-171. Buildings should front the street rather than be organized around interior courtyards or parking areas. Policy LU-172. Non-residential structures, such as community recreation buildings, that are part of the development, may have dimensions larger than residential structures, but should be compatible in design and dimensions with surrounding residential development. Policy LU-173. Non-residential structures should be clustered and connected within the overall development through the organization of roads, blocks, yards, focal points, and amenity features to create a neighborhood. Policy LU-174. Single-family detached building types in the Residential Medium Density designation should have a maximum lot coverage by the primary structure of fifty (50) percent. Policy LU-175. In the Residential Medium Density designation common open space equal to 1,200-square feet per unit and maintained by a homeowners' association, should be provided for each semi -attached or attached unit. Policy LU-176. Support site plans that transition to and blend with existing development patterns using techniques such as lot size, depth and width, access points, building location setbacks, and landscaping. Sensitivity to unique features and differences among established neighborhoods should be reflected in site plan design. Interpret development standards to support ground -related orientation, coordinated structural design, and private yards or substantial common space areas. Policy LU-177. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of a project in the Residential 14 zone should consist of the following primary residential types: traditional detached, zero lot line detached, or townhouses with individual yards that are scaled appropriately for each unit. Policy LU-178. Longer townhouse buildings or other types of multi -family buildings, considered secondary residential types (see RMC 4-9-065), should be limited in size so that the mass and bulk of the building has a small scale multi -family character, rather than a large, garden -style apartment development. Policy LU-179. In the Residential 14 zone, multi -unit townhouses that qualify as a primary residential type (see RMC 4-9-065) should be limited in size so that the mass and bulk is at a human scale. Policy LU-180. Projects in a Residential 14 zone should have no more than fifty (50) percent of the units designed as secondary residential types, i.e. longer townhouse building clusters, or longer multi -family buildings of other types. Policy LU-181. Mixed -use development in the form of civic, commercial development, or other non-residential structures, may be allowed in the central places of Residential Medium Density development projects within the Residential 14 zone, subject to compliance with criteria established through development regulations. RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMMY LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The multi -family residential land use designation is intended to encourage a range of multi -family living environments that provide shelter for a wide variety of people in differing living situations, from all income levels, and in all stages of life. Although some people live in multi -family situations because they do not have an alternative, others prefer living in multi -family environments rather than in single-family, detached houses. Regardless of why they live there, they want and deserve the same high standards for their homes and neighborhoods. Single-family and multi -family residential developments have different impacts on the community. The City must identify a housing mix and implement policies that adequately address and balance the needs of both residents and the community as a whole. The Multi -family Residential designation is implemented by Residential Multi -family (RMF) zoning. Objective LU-JJ: Encourage the development of infill parcels with quality projects in existing multi -family districts. Policy LU-182. Residential Multi -family designations should be in areas of the City where projects would be compatible with existing uses and where infrastructure is adequate to handle impacts from higher density uses. Policy LU-183. Land within the Residential Multi -family designation areas should be used to meet multi -family housing needs, without expanding the area boundaries, until land capacity in this designation is used. Residential Multi -family designations have the highest priority for development or redevelopment with multi -family uses. Policy LU-184. Expansion of the Residential Multi -family designation is limited to properties meeting the following criteria: P.— zl „F 7n Page 33 of 70 Properties under consideration should take access from a principal arterial, minor arterial, or collector. Direct access should not be through a less intense land use designation area; Properties under consideration must abut an existing Residential Multi -family land use designation on at least two (2) sides and be on the same side of the principal arterial, minor arterial, or collector serving it; and Any such expansion of the Residential Multi -family land use designation should not bisect or truncate another contiguous land use district. Policy LU-185. Development density in the Residential Multi -family designation should be within a range of ten (10) dwelling units per acre as a minimum to twenty (20) dwelling units per acre as a maximum. Objective LU-KK: Due to increased impacts to privacy and personal living space inherent in higher density living environments, new development should be designed to create a high quality living environment. Policy LU-186. New stacked flat and townhouse development in Residential Multi- family designations should be compatible in size, scale, bulk, use, and design with existing multi -family developments in the vicinity. Policy LU-187. Detached cottage housing designed to include site amenities with common open space features should be supported in multi -family designations if density goals are met. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-188. Evaluate project proposals in Residential Multi -family designations to consider the transition to lower density uses where multi -family sites abut lower density zones. Setbacks may be increased, heights reduced, and additional landscape buffering required through site plan review. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. I ) In order to increase the potential compatibility of multi -family projects, with other projects of similar use and density, minimum setbacks for side yards should be proportional to the total lot width, i.e. wider lots should require larger setback dimensions; 2) Taller buildings (greater than two stories) should have larger side yard setback dimensions; and 3) Heights of buildings should be limited to three stories and thirty-five (35) feet, unless greater heights can be demonstrated to be compatible with existing buildings on abutting and adjacent lots. Objective LU-LL: New Residential Multi -family projects should demonstrate provision of an environment that contributes to a high quality of life for future residents, regardless of income level. Implementing code will be put in place within two years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-189. Support project design that incorporates the following, or similar elements, in architectural design: 1) Variation of facades on all sides of structures visible from the street with vertical and horizontal modulation or articulation; 2) Angular roof lines on multiple planes and with roof edge articulation such as modulated cornices; 3) Private entries from the public sidewalk fronting the building for ground floor units; 4) Ground floor units elevated from sidewalk level; 5) Upper -level access interior to the building; 6) Balconies that serve as functional open space for individual units; and 7) Common entryways with canopy or similar feature. Policy LU-190. Support project site planning that incorporates the following, or similar elements, in order to meet the intent of the objective: 1) Buildings oriented toward public streets, 2) Private open space for ground -related units, 3) Common open or green space in sufficient amount to be useful, 4) Preferably underground parking or structured parking located under the residential building, 5) Surface parking, if necessary, to be located to the side or rear of the residential building(s), 6) Landscaping of all pervious areas of the property, and 7) Landscaping, consisting of groundcover and street trees (at a minimum), of all setbacks and rights -of way abutting the property. Implementation of this policy should be phased within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-191. Residential Multi -family projects in the RMF zone should have a maximum site coverage by buildings of thirty-five (35) percent, or forty-five (45) percent if greater coverage can be demonstrated to be both mitigated on site with amenities and compatible with existing buildings on abutting and adjacent lots. Policy LU-192. Residential Multi -family projects should have maximum site coverage by impervious materials of seventy-five (75) percent. Page 34 of 70 Page 35 of 70 M CENTERS Goal: Develop well-balanced attractive, convenient, robust commercial office, office, and residential development within designated Centers serving the City and the region. Discussion: The Centers category of land use includes two areas of the City, the Center Village in the Highlands and the Urban Center located in the historic downtown and the employment area north to Lake Washington. The Urban Center includes two sub -areas: Urban Center- Downtown (220 acres) and the Urban Center -North (310 acres). Together these two areas are envisioned to evolve into a vibrant city core that provides arts, entertainment, regional employment opportunities, recreation, and quality urban residential neighborhoods. The Renton Urban Center is envisioned as the dynamic heart of a growing regional city. Renton's Urban Center will provide significant capacity for new housing in order to absorb the city's share of future regional growth. This residential population will help to balance the City's employment population and thereby meet the policy directive of a 2:1 ratio of jobs to housing. The Center Village designation is envisioned as a revitalized residential and commercial area providing goods and services to the Greater Hghlands area. The area could potentially become a focal point for a larger area, the Coal Creek Corridor, connecting Renton to Newcastle to Issaquah. While development is envisioned at a smaller scale than expected in the Urban Center, the Village Center will still focus on urban mixed -use projects with a pedestrian oriented development pattern. Objective LU-MM: Encourage a wide range and combination of uses, developed at sufficient intensity to maximize efficient use of land, support transit use, and create a viable district. Policy LU-193. Promote the innovative site planning and clustering of Center uses and discourage the development of strip commercial areas. Policy LU-194. Phase implementation of development within Centers to support economically feasible development in the short term but also provide a transition to achieve new development consistent with long term land use objectives. Policy LU-195. Designate Center boundaries according to the following criteria: 1) The boundary should coincide with a major change in land use type or intensity; 2) Boundaries should consider topography and natural features such as ravines, hills, and significant stands of trees; 3) Boundaries should occur along public rights -of -way including streets or utility easements, or at rear property lines where justified by the existing land use pattern. Boundary lines should not be drawn through the interior of parcels; and 4) As a maximum distance, the boundary should be drawn within a walkable distance from one or two focal points, which may be defined by intersections, transit stops, or shopping centers. Policy LU-196. Designate Centers in locations with the following characteristics: 1) A nucleus of existing multi -use development; 2) Potential for redevelopment, or vacant land to encourage significant concentration of development; 3) Center locations should be located on major transit and transportation routes; 4) Center locations should be served by the City's arterial street system. Policy LU-197. Change adopted boundaries only in the following circumstances: 1) The original mapping failed to consider a major natural feature or significant land use that would make implementation of the boundary illogical, or 2) The amount of land within a Center is inadequate to allow development of the range and intensity of uses envisioned for the Center. Policy LU-198. Support new office and commercial development that is more intensive than the older office and commercial development in existing Centers in order to create more compact and efficient Centers over time. Policy LU-199. Allow stand-alone residential development of various types and urban densities in portions of Centers not conducive to commercial development, or in the Urban Center in districts designated for residential use. Policy LU-200. Allow residential uses throughout Centers as part of mixed -use developments. Consider bonus incentives for housing types compatible with commercial uses or lower density residential that is adjacent to Centers. Policy LU-201. Include uses that are compatible with each other within mixed -use developments; for example, office and certain retail uses with residential, office, and retail. Policy LU-202. Locate and design commercial uses within a residential mixed -use development in a manner that preserves privacy and quiet for residents. Policy LU-203. Modify existing commercial and residential uses that are adjacent to or within new proposed development to implement the new Center land use vision as much as possible through alterations in parking lot design, landscape, signage, and site plan as redevelopment opportunities occur. Policy LU-204. Consolidate signage for mixed -use development. Policy LU-205. Identify major natural features and support development of new focal points that define the Center and are visually distinctive. Policy LU-206. Design focal points to include a combination of public areas such as parks or plazas, architectural features such as towers, outstanding building design, transit stops, or outdoor eating areas. These features should be connected to pedestrian pathways if possible. Policy LU-207. Evaluate existing intersections of arterial roadways for opportunities to create focal points. Page 36 of 70 Page 37 of 70 Policy LU-208. Consolidate access to existing streets and provide internal vehicular circulation that supports shared access. Policy LU-209. Locate parking for residential uses in the mixed -use developments to minimize disruption of pedestrian or auto access to the retail component of the project. Policy LU-210. Connect residential uses to other uses in the Center through design features such as pedestrian access, shared parking areas, and common open spaces. Objective NN: Implement Renton's Urban Center consistent with the "Urban Centers criteria" of the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) to create an area of concentrated employment and housing with direct service by high capacity transit and a wide range of land uses such as commercial/office/retail, recreation, public facilities, parks and open space. Policy LU-211. Renton's Urban Center should be maintained and redeveloped with supporting land use decisions and projects that accomplish the following objectives: 1) Enhance existing neighborhoods by creating investment opportunities in quality urban scale development; 2) Promote housing opportunities close to employment and commercial areas; 3) Support development of an extensive transportation system to reduce dependency on automobiles; 4) Strive for urban densities that use land more efficiently; 5) Maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services; 6) Reduce costs of and time required for permitting; and 7) Evaluate and mitigate environmental impacts. Policy LU-212. Establish two sub -areas within Renton's Urban Center. 1) Urban Center -Downtown (UC-D) is Renton's historic commercial district, surrounded by established residential neighborhoods. The UC-D is located from the Cedar River south to South 7th Street and between I405 on the east and Shattuck Avenue South on the west. 2) Urban Center —North (UC-N) is the area that includes Southport, the Puget Sound Energy sub -station, and the South Lake Washington redevelopment area. The UC-N is located generally from Lake Washington on the north, the Cedar River and Renton Municipal Airport to the west, Sixth Street and Renton Stadium to the south, and Houser Way to the east. Policy LU-213. Maintain zoning that creates capacity for employment levels of 50 employees per gross acre and residential levels of 15 households per gross acre within the Urban Center. Policy LU-214: Support developments that utilize Urban Center levels of capacity. Where market conditions do not support Urban Center employment and residential levels, support site planning and/or phasing alternatives that demonstrate how, over time, infill or redevelopment can meet Urban Center objectives. Policy LU-215. Site and building design should be pedestrian/people oriented with provisions for transit and automobiles where appropriate. URBAN CENTER DOWNTOWN LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The Urban Center - Downtown (UC-D) is expected to redevelop as a destination shopping area providing neighborhood, citywide, and sub -regional services and mixed -use residential development. UC-D residential development is expected to support urban scale multi -family projects at high densities, consistent with Urban Center policies. Projects in the UC-D are expected to incorporate mixed -uses including retail, office, residential, and service uses that support transit and further the synergism of public and private sector activities. In the surrounding neighborhoods, ill urban scale townhouse and multi -family residential developments are anticipated. Site planning and infrastructure will promote a pedestrian scale environment and amenities. Objective LU-OO: Create a balance of land uses that contribute to the revitalization of downtown Renton and, with the designated Urban Center - North, fulfill the requirements of an Urban Center as defined by Countywide Planning Policies, Policy LU-216. Uses in the Urban Center Downtown should include a dynamic mix of uses, including retail, entertainment, restaurant, office, and residential, that contribute to a vibrant city core. Policy LU-217. Development and redevelopment of Urban Center Downtown should strive for urban density and intensity of uses. Policy LU-218. Ground floor uses with street frontage along Wells Avenue South between Houser Way and South 2nd Street and along South 3rd Street between Main Avenue South and Burnett Avenue South should be limited to businesses which primarily cater to walk-in customer traffic (i.e. retail goods and services) in order to generate and maintain continuous pedestrian activity in these areas. Walk-in customer oriented businesses should also be encouraged to locate along street frontages in the remainder of the downtown core. Policy LU-219. Projects in the Urban Center - Downtown should achieve an urban density and intensity of development that is greater than typical suburban neighborhoods. Characteristics of urban intensity include no or little setbacks, taller structures, mixed - uses, structured parking, and urban plazas and amenities within buildings. Policy LU-220. Non -conforming uses should transition to conforming uses. Non- conforming structures should be re -used to house conforming uses unless the size and scale of the structure significantly limits the intensity and quality of development that can be achieved. Policy LU-221. Development should not exceed mid -rise heights (maximuml0 stories) within the Urban Center - Downtown. Objective LU-PP: Encourage the evolution of downtown Renton as a regional commercial district that complements the redevelopment expected to occur in the Urban Center - North. Page 38 of 70 Page 39 of 70 Policy LU-222. Automobile -related sales and service uses that require large amounts of land and currently exist within the Urban Center — Downtown should be encouraged to locate in the City's "Auto Mall" located outside of the Urban Center - Downtown or to consolidate their sites and provide multi -storied facilities. New automobile -related sales and service uses should be discouraged from locating in the Urban Center - Downtown. Policy LU-223. Discourage uses including expansion of existing uses in the Urban Center - Downtown that require large areas of surface parking and/or drive -through service queuing space. Objective LU-QQ: Encourage additional residential development in the Urban Center - Downtown supporting the Countywide Planning Policies definition of Urban Center. Policy LU-224. Maximize the use of existing urban services and civic amenities and revitalize the City's downtown by promoting medium to high -density residential development in the downtown area. Allowed densities should conform to the criteria for Urban Centers in the countywide policies. Policy LU-225. Mixed -use development where residential and commercial uses are allowed in the same building or on the same site, should be encouraged in the urban Center - Downtown. Incentives should be developed to encourage future development or redevelopment projects that incorporate residential uses. Policy LU-226. Net residential development densities in the Urban Center - Downtown designation should achieve a range of 14-100 dwelling units per acre and vary by zoning district. Policy LU-227. Density bonuses up to 150 du/ac may be granted within designated areas for provision of, or contribution to, a public amenity (e.g. passive recreation, public art) or provision of additional structured public parking. Policy LU-228. Condominium development and high -density owner -occupied townhouse development is encouraged in the Urban Center - Downtown. Objective LU-RR: Recognize the following Downtown Districts reflecting varying development standards and uses that distinguish these areas. 1) Downtown Pedestrian District; 2) Downtown Core; 3) South Renton's Williams -Wells Subarea (see South Renton Neighborhood Plan); 4) South Renton's Burnett Park Subarea (see South Renton Neighborhood Plan); and 5) Cedar River Subarea north of the Downtown Core. Policy LU-229. Encourage the most intensive development in the Downtown Pedestrian District and Downtown Core with a transition to lower -scale commercial and residential projects in areas surrounding the Downtown Core. Policy LU-230. Ground -floor uses with street frontage in the Downtown Pedestrian District should be limited to businesses that primarily cater to walk-in customer traffic (i.e. retail goods and services) in order to generate and maintain continuous pedestrian. activity in these areas. Policy LU-231. Walk-in customer -oriented businesses should be encouraged to locate along street frontages in the Downtown Core Area and the portion of the Urban Center Downtown located west of it. Policy LU-232. Medium -rise residential (6-10 stories) should be located within the Cedar River Subarea, primarily between the Cedar River and South 2nd, and between South 7th and the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way. Policy LU-233. The area between South 7th and the Burlington Northern Railroad right- of-way should include a combination of low- (1-5 stories) and medium -rise residential to provide a transition between the employment area and the mixed -use core. Policy LU-234. Specific streetscapes, development standards, and design guidelines for the South Renton Neighborhood are outlined in the South Renton Neighborhood Plan within the Subarea Plan section of the Comprehensive Plan. Objective LU-SS: Promote a reasonable balance between parking supply and parking demand within the downtown. Policy LU-235. Parking should be structured whenever feasible. Accessory surface parking is discouraged. Policy LU-236. The existing supply of parking should be better managed to encourage joint use rather than parking for each individual business. Policy LU-237. Downtown parking standards should recognize the different demands and requirements of both local and regional commercial parking versus those of office and residential uses. Policy LU-238. Alternatives to individual on -site parking that encourage efficient use of urban land (e.g. fees in lieu of parking, multiple -use or shared parking leased off -site parking, car -sharing) should be encouraged. Policy LU-239. Parking standards and requests for parking modifications for downtown residents should reflect the market demand of urban residential uses, taking into account transit service availability, car -sharing availability, and other transportation demand management tools available. Policy LU-240. In order to maximize on -street parking availability in the downtown, loading and delivery areas for downtown uses should be consolidated and limited to alleys, other off-street areas, or city -designated on -street loading zones. Alley and off- street loading and delivery areas should be screened from view of the street. Policy LU-241. Alleys should be maintained in the Urban Center - Downtown in order to facilitate use of alley -accessed parking areas, freight delivery, and removal of refuse and recyclables. Objective LU-TT: Develop a transit circulation/distribution system that provides convenient connections between downtown and residential, employment, and other commercial areas within the Renton planning area. Page 40 of 70 Page 41 of 70 Policy LU-242. Transit should link the downtown with other parts of the Urban Center, other commercial activity areas, and the City's major employment areas to encourage use of the downtown by those employees both during and after work hours. Policy LU-243. Future development and improvements in the Urban Center — Downtown should emphasize non -automobile oriented travel both to and within the downtown, while maintaining an adequate amount of parking for regional retail customers. Transit and parking programs should be integrated, balanced, and implemented concurrently. Policy LU-244. Both intercity and intra-city transit should be focused at the Renton Transit Center, the multi -modal transit facility located in the Downtown Core Area. Policy LU-245. Permanent park and ride facilities in the Urban Center - Downtown should use structured parking garages and support the Transit Center. Policy LU-246. Continue development of transit -oriented development in the activity node established by the downtown transit facility. Policy LU-247. Seek ways of improving speed and reliability of transit serving Renton's Downtown. Policy LU-248. Transit span of service should increase as Downtown Renton adds evening entertainment, dining, and recreation opportunities. Objective LU-UU: Improve the City's pedestrian and bicycle network to increase access to and circulation within the Urban Center - Downtown. Policy LU-249. Pedestrian spaces should be emphasized and connected throughout the downtown. Policy LU-250. Pedestrians should be given priority use of sidewalks within the Urban Center — Downtown designated pedestrian areas. Policy LU-251. Block lengths and widths should be maintained at the pedestrian - friendly standards that predominate within the downtown. Policy LU-252. Where right-of-way is available and bicycle demand justify them, bicycle lanes should be marked and signed to accommodate larger volumes of bicycle traffic on select streets designated by the City. Policy LU-253. Secure bicycle parking facilities, such as bike lockers and bike racks should be provided at residential, commercial, and public establishments to encourage bicycle use. Objective LU-W: Improve the visual, physical and experiential quality, lighting and safety, especially for pedestrians, along downtown streets. Policy LU-254. Strong visual linkages should be created between downtown Renton and neighborhoods using landscaped arterial streets and connectors. Policy LU-255. Buildings along South 3rd Street between Main and Burnett Avenues should retain a pedestrian scale by employing design techniques that maintain the appearance and feel of low-rise structures to avoid creation of the "canyon effect" (e.g. preserving historic fapades, stepping fagades back above the second or third floor). Policy LU-256. Downtown gateways should employ distinctive landscaping, signage, art, architectural style, and similar techniques to better delineate the downtown and enhance its unique character. Policy LU-257. Parking lots and structures should employ and maintain landscaping and other design techniques to minimize the visual impacts of these uses. Objective LU-WW: Improve the visual and physical appearance of buildings to create a more positive image for downtown. Policy LU-258. Site and building designs, (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and setback; landscaping; and parking, should reflect unity of design to create a distinct sense of place and mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent uses. Policy LU-259. Incentives should be developed to encourage rehabilitation (e.g. facade restoration) of older downtown buildings. Objective LU-XX: Maintain and expand the available amenities to make the Urban Center - Downtown more appealing to existing and potential customers, residents, and employees. Policy LU-260. Design guidelines should assist developers in creating attractive projects that add value to the downtown community, attract new residents, employees, and visitors, and foster a unique downtown identity. Policy LU-261. Design guidelines may vary by zone within the downtown area to recognize and foster unique identities for the different land use areas (i.e. South Renton's Burnett Park subarea). Policy LU-262. New downtown parks should complement existing park facilities and be compatible with planned trails. Trails should be integrated with the existing trail system. Policy LU-263. Urban Center - Downtown development should be designed to take advantage of existing unique downtown amenities such as the Cedar River, City parks and trails, the downtown Transit Center, IKEA Performing Arts Center, and Renton High School. Policy LU-264. Public amenities such as art, fountains, or similar features should be incorporated into the design of public areas, major streets and gateways of the Urban Center - Downtown. URBAN CENTER NORTH LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The purpose of the UC-N is to redevelop industrial land for new office, residential, and commercial uses at a sufficient scale to implement the Urban Centers criteria adopted in the Countywide Planning Policies. This portion of the Urban Page 42 of 70 Page 43 of 70 Center is anticipated to attract large-scale redevelopment greater than that in the Urban Center -Downtown, due to the large available land holdings under single ownership. In addition, this new development is expected to include a wider group of uses including remaining industrial activities, new research and development facilities, laboratories, retail integrated into pedestrian -oriented shopping districts, and a range of urban -scale mixed -use residential, office and commercial uses. The combined uses will generate significant tax income for the City and provide jobs to balance the capacity for the more than 5,000 additional households in the Urban Center. Development is expected to complement the Urban Center -Downtown. UC-N policies will provide a blueprint for the transition of land over the next 30 years into this dynamic, urban mixed -use district. Policy LU-265. Support more urban intensity of development (e.g. building height, bulk, landscaping, parking standards) than with land uses in the suburban areas of the City outside the Urban Center. Policy LU-266. Achieve a mix of uses that improves the City's tax and employment base. Policy LU-267. Support a range and variety of commercial and office uses. Policy LU-268. Allow hospitality uses such as hotels, convention and conference centers. Policy LU-269. Co -locate uses within a site and/or building in order to promote urban style, mixed -use development. Policy LU-270. Support incorporation of public facilities such as schools, museums, medical offices, and government offices into redevelopment efforts by developing a public/private partnership with developers and other Renton stakeholders such as the school district, technical college, and hospital district. Policy LU-271. Support uses that sustain minimum Urban Center employment levels of 50 employees per gross acre and residential levels of 15 households per gross acre within the entire Urban Center. Policy LU-272. Support uses that serve the region, a sub -regional, or citywide market as well as the surrounding neighborhoods. Policy LU-273. Support integration of community -scale office and service uses including restaurants, theaters, day care, art museums and studios. Policy LU-274. Support transit stations and transit usage connecting to a system of park and ride lots outside the Urban Center -North. Support park and ride facilities within the Urban Center only when they are included in structured parking as a stand-alone use or are developed as part of a mixed -use project. Policy LU-275. Support an expanded and extended public right-of-way in the vicinity of the present Logan Avenue to provide new arterial access within the Urban Center. Additionally, this will provide a physical buffer between redevelopment and continuing airplane manufacturing operations. Policy LU-276. Support extension of Park Ave. to Lake Washington Policy LU-277. Recognize the need for secure limited access within large manufacturing facilities by retaining private drives and roads in areas where airplane manufacturing operations continue. Policy LU-278. Support creation of a significant gateway feature within gateway nodes as shown on the Urban Center -North Gateway Map. Policy LU-279. Support privatetpublic partnerships to plan and finance infrastructure development, public uses and amenities. Policy LU-280. Use a hierarchy of conceptual plan, master plan and site plan review and approval to encourage the cohesive development of large land areas within the Urban Center -North. Incorporate integrated design regulations into this review process. Policy LU-281. Address the mix and compatibility of uses, residential density, conceptual building, site and landscape design, identification of gateway features, signs, circulation, transit opportunities, and phasing through master plan and site plan review process. Policy LU-282. Fully integrate signage, building height, bulk, setbacks, landscaping, and parking considerations in structures and site plans across the various components of each proposed development. Policy LU-283. Require significant pedestrian element in internal site circulation plans. Policy LU-284. Allow phasing plans for mixed -use projects. Policy LU-285. Consider placement of structures and parking areas in initial redevelopment plans to facilitate later infill development at higher densities and intensities over time. Policy LU-286. Support structured parking to facilitate full redevelopment of the Urban Center over the 30-year planning horizon. Where structured parking is infeasible for early phases of development, parking should be located in the rear or the side of the primary structure. Policy LU-287. Discourage parking lots between structures and street right-of-way. Policy LU-288. Orient buildings to streets to emphasize urban character, maximize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use within the District. Policy LU-289. Use design regulations to provide direction on site design, building design, landscape treatments, and parking and circulation. Policy LU-290. Support a combination of internal and external site design features such as: 1) Plazas; 2) Prominent architectural features; 3) Significant natural features; 4) Distinctive focal features; and 5) Gateways. Policies for surrounding residential area (north Renton neighborhood south of N 6a' St) Page 44 of 70 Page 45 of 70 Policy LU-291. Provide a transition in land use with respect to intensity of development where areas mapped Residential Single Family and Residential Options border Urban Center - North designations. Policy LU-292. Create boulevard standards for arterial streets connecting or running through adjacent residential neighborhoods that address noise, pedestrian sidewalks, planting areas between vehicular lanes and pedestrian areas, traffic calming techniques, lighting standards, a landscape planting plan for street trees and other vegetation, and street furniture. Policy LU-293. Support a mix of activities within the Urban Center - North designation that support populations in adjacent residential areas as well as new development within the re -development area. Examples of uses that serve the needs of existing populations include neighborhood -scale retail that addresses the day-to-day needs of residents, restaurants and coffee houses, public facilities, and places of assembly such as parks and plazas. Policies for Public Facilities Policy LU-294. Evaluate public facility needs for projected new populations within the Urban Center — North to accommodate a wide range of future users. Policy LU-295. Support a partnership with community stakeholders such as the Renton School District o provide a transition for public properties adjacent to the Urban Center — North such as the Sartori School and Renton Stadium facilities. Transition of these facilities could range from accommodating a new clientele as the area transitions to mixed use activities, or physical re -development of properties addressing the needs of employees or residents of the Urban Center. Policy LU-296. Recognize the Renton Municipal Airport as an essential public facility. (See Section on Airport Compatibility Policies). Urban Center Nortb Districts The proposed Urban Center -North is divided into two districts for planning purposes. Each District has a different emphasis in terms of range, intensity and mix of uses. These are District One, east of Logan Avenue, and District Two, west of Logan Avenue. The implementation of planning concepts for District Two will be dependent on decisions by The Boeing Company regarding continued airplane assembly operations at the Renton Plant. For this reason, initiation of redevelopment in District Two will likely occur after transition of the area east of Logan Avenue, District One, has begun. Consolidation of Boeing operations may cause certain property located within District One to be deemed surplus, making it available for redevelopment within the near future. District One is envisioned to include a variety of uses. The intensity of these uses would require substantial infrastructure improvements. More extensive development, ultimately anticipated with the future development of District Two, will likely require even more significant infrastructure upgrades. Redevelopment in both districts of the Urban Center - North will be responsive and protective of the North Renton residential neighborhood to the south. While the North Renton neighborhood is not a part of the Urban Center, its residents will benefit from the significant amenities provided by development of a new urban community. Redevelopment within both districts will occur in a manner that is not incompatible with the operations at the Renton Municipal Airport, recognizing that the airport is an essential public facility located within an urban area. Redevelopment within both districts will be consistent with the City's Airport Compatible Land Use Program. The program responds to State requirements to consider how land use in the surrounding areas affects the Renton airport. The current supply of underutilized land north of N. St° Street creates an immediate redevelopment opportunity for a first phase of development in District One. However, the industrial character of the surrounding developed properties, both within District Two to the west and the Employment Area -Industrial area to the east, will make it difficult to achieve true urban intensities in District One at the beginning of this transition. The overall Vision for the District contemplates much more than a series of low-rise structures with large parking lots. Therefore, it is important that this initial development facilitates later stages of investment as the neighborhood matures and property values increase. It is also critical that the early -stage vision for District One sets the stage for high -quality redevelopment in District Two. The following "visions" have been developed for each District. Vision - District One The changes in District One will be dramatic, as surface parking lots and existing large- scale industrial buildings are replaced by retail, flex tech, and office uses. Initial development may be characterized by large -format, low-rise buildings surrounding internal surface parking lots and bordered by a strong pedestrian -oriented spine along Park Avenue. As the Urban Center -North evolves, the buildings of District One may be remodeled and/or replaced with taller, higher density structures. Parking structures may also be built in future phases as infill projects that further the urbanization of the District. Two initial patterns of development are anticipated within the District: one, creating a destination retail shopping district; and the other, resulting in a more diverse mixed -use, urban scale office and technical center with supporting commercial retail uses. It is hoped that over time these patterns will blend to become a cohesive mixed -use district. In its first phases of development, District One hosts for the region a new form of retail center. Absent are the physical constraints of a covered mall. Although parking initially may be handled in surface lots, their configuration, juxtaposed with smaller building units, eliminates the expanse of paving that makes other retail shopping areas unappealing to pedestrians. Building facades, of one or two stories, are positioned adjacent to sidewalks and landscaped promenades. Destination retail uses that draw from a sub -regional or regional market blend with small, specialty stores in an integrated shopping environment to support other businesses in the area. While large -format ("big - box") retail stores anchor development, they do not stand-alone. Rather, they are architecturally and functionally connected to the smaller shops and stores in integrated shopping centers. Cafes with outdoor seating, tree -lined boulevards and small gathering places invite shoppers to linger after making their initial purchases. Retail development Page 46 of 70 Page 47 of 70 takes an urban form with high -quality design considering a human scale and pedestrian orientation. While retail development will add to the City's tax base and create a modest increase in employment, the vision for the Urban Center -North is that of a dense employment center. Within the initial phases of redevelopment, job growth will also occur in high -quality, well -designed flex/tech development and low- to mid -rise office, lab and research and development buildings that provide attractive environments for companies offering high - wage careers in information technology, life sciences and light (clean) manufacturing and assembly industries. Redevelopment in this area will also include residential opportunities in low- to mid -rise buildings with upper -story office and/or ground -related retail. Additional supporting retail will also be constructed. Logan Avenue is extended and redeveloped for public use as a major, tree -lined parkway. During the second generation of redevelopment in District One, changing property values and further investment will allow for higher density development in the form of offices and residences mixed with other uses. As this area is transformed into a mature mixed - use district, community gathering spaces and recreation facilities to support the City's neighborhoods and business districts become viable. Cultural facilities, as well as convention and conference centers may be located within the District and could be incorporated into mixed -use development with retail, office and hotels. Small parks, open space, and community gathering places will be incorporated into site design. Facilities such as multiple -screen theaters and other cultural facilities may add to the amenity value of the District. District One Policies Objective LU-YY: Create a major commercial/retail district developed with uses that add significantly to Renton's retail tax base, provide additional employment opportunities within the City, attract businesses that serve a broad market area and act as a gathering place within the community. Policy LU-297. Support office and technology -based uses with retail uses and services along portions of the ground floors to facilitate the creation of an urban and pedestrian environment. Policy LU-298. Support uses supporting high-technology industries such as biotechnology, life sciences, and information technology by providing retail amenities and services in the area. Policy LU-299. Allow for the development of destination retail centers that are consistent with a district -wide conceptual plan. Policy LU-300. Encourage the placement of buildings for retail tenants along pedestrian - oriented streets to create urban configurations. Policy LU-301. Ensure that big -box retail functions as an anchor to larger, cohesive, urban -scale retail developments. Policy LU-302. Encourage a variety of architectural treatments and styles to create an urban environment. Objective LU-ZZ: Create an urban district initially characterized by high -quality, compact, low-rise development that can accommodate a range of independent retail, office, research, or professional companies. Support the continuing investment in and transition of low-rise development into more intensive, urban forms of development to support a vital mixed -use district over time. Policy LU-303. Encourage pedestrian -oriented development through master planning, building location, and design guidelines. Policy LU-304. Support urban forms of setback and buffering treatment such as: a) Street trees with sidewalk grates, b) Paving and sidewalk extensions or plazas, and c) Planters and street furniture. Policy LU-305. Allow phasing plans for developments as part of the master plan and site plan review that: a) Provide a strategy for future infill or redevelopment with mixed -use buildings. b) Preserve opportunities for future structured parking and more intense employment -generating development. Policy LU-306. Support parking at -grade in surface parking lots only when structured or under -building parking is not market viable. Policy LU-307. Support development of parking structures using private/public partnerships when market will not support structural parking without subsidy. Policy LU-308. Support surface parking lots behind buildings, and in the center of blocks, screened from the street by structures with landscape buffers. Policy LU-309. Consider public/private participation in provision of structured parking, to stimulate additional private investment and produce a more urban environment. Policy LU-310. Support shared parking by averaging parking ratios for co -located and mixed -uses. Policy LU-311. Reduce the suburban character of development, preserve opportunities for infill development, and provide for efficient use of land by setting maximum parking standards. Policy LU-312. Support the co -location of uses within a site and/or building in order to promote urban style mixed-use(commercial/retail/office/residential) development. Policy LU-313. Discourage ancillary retail pads. Page 48 of 70 Page 49 of 70 Vision - District Two Ongoing Boeing airplane manufacturing is supported to continue across District Two for the foreseeable future. This important industrial base will continue to provide high -wage jobs within the Urban Center — North as redevelopment occurs in District One. Should Boeing surplus property west of Logan Avenue, redevelopment that follows will take on more urban characteristics, incorporating mixed -use (residential, office, and retail) development types. Planning for the redevelopment of District Two will take into consideration the unique issues involved in the transition of a site historically used for heavy industry adjacent to the Renton Municipal Airport. Redevelopment will be consistent with the City's Urban Center -North Airport Compatible Land Use Program. Eventually, redevelopment will lead to the creation of a vibrant new lakefront community providing additional housing, shopping, and employment opportunities to the region. The South Lake Washington neighborhood will be a center of activity in the Puget Sound region —a premiere address for residents, a hub of economic activity providing capacity for high -wage jobs and a world -class destination for shopping, dining, recreation, and entertainment Mixed -use projects will be high in design and construction quality, and offer landmark living, shopping, and working environments planned to take advantage of a regionally centralized location, efficient access, mass transit, potential passenger ferry connections, stellar views of lake and mountains, and restored natural environments along the Cedar River and Lake Washington shorelines. Development within District Two will be organized into neighborhoods with housing, shopping, employment, and recreation opportunities located within walking distance. Low- to mid -rise buildings will be located to the south while development to the north will be primarily mid -to- high-rise in order to maximize views. While some on -street or surface parking may occur, the majority of parking will be provided in the lower levels of mixed -use buildings or in stand-alone structures designed to blend in with the surrounding neighborhood. This environment attracts a residential population living in up -scale neighborhoods featuring higher -density condominium and apartment forms of housing north of N. 8' St. Townhouse developments south of N. 8a' St. provide a transition to the adjacent North Renton neighborhood in terms of scale and use of buildings. Residents of both neighborhoods will find ample shopping and employment opportunities in the immediate vicinity. Residents, employees and visitors will enjoy new public open space. These range from public access to the lakefront through small parks, overviews, and trails, to large public plazas and central greens that provide gathering places, recreational opportunities, and a celebration of views of the Seattle skyline, the Olympic Mountains, and Mount Rainier District Two Policies Objective LU-AAA: Support ongoing airplane manufacturing and accessory uses. Policy LU-314. Support existing airplane manufacturing and accessory uses while allowing for the gradual transition to other uses should The Boeing Company surplus property within District Two. Policy LU-315. Allow airplane manufacturing and related accessory uses such as airplane sales and repair, laboratories for research, development and testing, medical institutions, and light industrial uses including small scale or less intensive production and manufacturing, and fabricating with accessory office and support services. Objective LU-BBB: If Boeing elects to surplus property in District Two, land uses will transition into an urban area characterized by high -quality development offering landmark living, shopping and work environments planned to take advantage of access and views to the adjacent river and shoreline. Policy LU-316. Should The Boeing Company elect to surplus properties in District Two support the redevelopment with a range and variety of commercial, office, research, and residential uses. 1) Support a mid- to high-rise scale and intensity of development. 2) Support retail and service activities as ancillary uses that are synergistic with commercial, office, biotech, research, technology, and residential activities. Traditional retail (Main Street), general business and professional services, and general offices are examples of the types of uses that are supported in combination with other activities. 3) Support urban scale residential development in District Two. North of N. 8'6 Street structured parking should be required. 4) Allow a limited range of service uses, such as churches, government offices and facilities, commercial parking garages, and day care centers through the conditional use process. 5) Allow eating and drinking establishments and cultural facilities as part of office or mixed -use development. 6) Prohibit new warehousing, storage including self -storage, vehicle sales, repair and display (including boats, cars, trucks and motorcycles), assembly and packaging operations, heavy and medium manufacturing and fabrication unrelated to production of new commercial airplanes. 7) Support development of public amenities such as public open space, schools, recreational and cultural facilities, and museums. 8) Allow commercial uses such as retail and services provided that they support the primary uses of the site and are architecturally and functionally integrated into the development. CENTER VILLAGE LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: Center Village is characterized by areas of the City that provide an opportunity for redevelopment as close -in urban mixed -use residential and commercial areas that are pedestrian oriented. These areas are anticipated to provide medium to high - density residential development and a wide range of commercial activities serving citywide and sub -regional markets. Center Villages typically are developed within an Page 50 of 70 Page 51 of 70 existing suburban land use pattern where opportunities exist to modify the development pattern to accommodate more growth within the existing urban areas by providing for compact urban development, transit orientation, pedestrian circulation, and a community focal point organized around an urban village concept. Objective LU-CCC: Develop Center Villages, characterized by intense urban development supported by site planning and infrastructure that provides a pedestrian scale environment. Policy LU-317. Apply the Center Village Designation to areas with an existing suburban and auto -oriented land use pattern, which, due to availability and proximity to existing residential neighborhoods, are candidate locations for a higher density mixed -use type of development. Policy LU-318. Implement the Center Village Designation using multiple zoning designations including Residential 10 (R-10), Center Village (CV), and Residential Multi -family (RMF). Strategy 319.1. Evaluate commercial and residential development standards in the Center Village and replace zoning designations or re -zone with the vision for a Center Village designation Strategy 319.2. Prepare a Highlands Plan as a sub -area plan to further refine the land use concept for and implement the Center Village land use concepts. Phasing of the Highlands Redevelopment Plan is expected to occur over a 2 — 5- year period. Strategy 319.3. Areas east of Edmonds and north of Sunset currently zoned RMF are to remain in residential use. The area north of 12`s St. currently zoned R-10 is to remain in residential use. Policy LU-320. Allow residential density ranging from 10 to 80 dwelling units per acre in the Center Village Designation. Policy LU-321. Encourage mixed -use structures and projects. Policy LU-322. Orient site and building design primarily toward pedestrians and people to maximize pedestrian activity and minimize automobile use for circulation within the Center Policy LU-323. Accommodate parking within a parking structure. Where structured parking is infeasible, parking should be located in the back or the side of the primary structure. Discourage parking lots between structures and street rights -of- way. Policy LU-324. Use alley access where alleys currently exist. Encourage designation of new alleys in redevelopment projects. Policy LU-325. Encourage shared parking to use urban land efficiency. Policy LU-326. Develop design guidelines to provide direction on site design, building design, landscape treatments, and parking and circulation components of new development projects. Implementation of this policy should be phased within three years of the adoption of the 2004 Update. Policy LU-327. Encourage uses in Center Villages that serve a sub -regional or citywide market as well as the surrounding neighborhoods. Policy LU-328. Encourage more urban style design and intensity of development (e.g. building height, bulk, landscaping, parking) within Center Villages than with land uses outside the Center. Policy LU-329. Promote the clustering of community commercial uses and discourage the development of strip commercial areas. Policy LU-330. Residential development within Center Villages is intended to be urban scale, stacked, flat and/or townhouse development with structured parking. Policy LU-331. Prohibit new garden style multi -family development. Policy LU-332. Provide community scale office and service uses. Page 52 of 70 Page 53 of 70 X. COMMERCIAL Goal: Support existing businesses and provide an energetic business environment for new commercial activity providing a range of service, office, commercial, and mixed use residential uses that enhance the City's employment and tax base along arterial boulevards and in designated development areas. Discussion: There are three commercial designations: 1) Commercial Corridor; 2) Contrnercial/Office/Residemlal; and 3) Commercial Neighborhood. These commercial areas range from intense retail corridors to major office parks to neighborhood scale commercial. Many commercial areas are located along arterials where the high volumes of daily traffic provide a substantial customer base. COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The Commercial Corridor district is characterized by concentrated, pre-existing commercial activity, primarily in a linear urban form, that provides necessary goods and services for daily living, accessible to near -by neighborhoods, serving a sub -regional market and accommodating large volumes of traffic. It is the intention of City objectives and policies that Commercial Corridor areas evolve from "strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site planning incorporating efficient parking lot design, coordinated access, amenities, and boulevard treatment. Commercial Corridor areas may include designated districts including concentrations of specialized uses such as the Auto Mall, or features such as transit stops and a combination of businesses creating a focal point of pedestrian activity and visual interest. Commercial Corridor areas are characterized by medium intensity levels of activity. It is anticipated, however, that intensity levels in these areas will increase over time as development of vacant space occurs, increased land value makes redevelopment feasible, and land is used more efficiently. In these districts, provision of pedestrian amenities is encouraged, as are opportunities to link adjacent uses and neighborhoods. Objective LU-DDD: The Commercial Corridor land use designation should include: 1) Established commercial and office areas; 2) Developments located on large parcels of land; 3) Projects that may be highly visible from principal arterials; 4) Uses dependent upon or benefiting from high -volume traffic; 5) Uses that provide significant employment; and 6) Businesses that provide necessary or desirable goods and services to the larger community. Policy LU-333. The Commercial Corridor Land Use designation should be mapped in areas with the following characteristics: 1) Located on, and having access to, streets classified as principle arterials; 2) High traffic volumes; or 3) Land use pattern characterized by strip commercial development, shopping centers, or office parks. Policy LU-334. The Commercial Corridor designation should be implemented through Commercial Arterial, Commercial Office, or Light Industrial zoning. Policy LU-335. Increased demand for commercial uses should be accommodated primarily through redevelopment and intensification of existing business area designations rather than expansion of those areas. Objective LU-EEE: Create opportunities for development and re -development of land in portions of the Commercial Corridor designation for general business and service uses. These include a wide range of restaurant, small-scale to big -box retail, offices, auto dealers, light industrial, and residential uses. Policy LU-336. Portions of the Commercial Corridor designation appropriate for a wide range of uses catering to low and medium intensity office, service, and retail uses should be mapped with Commercial Arterial zoning. Policy LU-337. Areas that should be considered for Commercial Arterial zoning should meet the following criteria: 1) The corridor is served by transit or has transit within one -quarter mile; 2) A historical strip commercial urban development pattern predominates, 3) Large, surface parking lots exist; 4) Primary development on the site is located at rear portions of the property with parking in front of the buildings; 5) Parcel size and configuration typically is defined by a larger parcel fronting the arterial street with multiple buildings and businesses; and 6) The corridor exhibits long block lengths and/or an incomplete grid street network. Policy LU-338. Commercial Arterial zoned areas should include an opportunity for residential uses and office as part of mixed -use development. Objective LU-FFF: Create opportunities for intensive office uses in portions of Commercial Corridor designations including a wide range of business, financial, and professional services supported by service and commercial/retail activities. Page 54 of 70 Paee 55 of 70 Policy LU-339. Areas of the City identified for intensive office use may be mapped with Commercial Office implementing zoning when site is developed, historically used for office, or the site meets the following criteria: 1) Site is located contiguous to an existing or planned transit route; 2) Large parcel size; 3) High visibility; and 4) Opportunities for views. Policy LU-340. Small-scale medical uses associated with major institutions should be located in the portions of Commercial Corridor designated areas with Commercial Office zoning, in the Urban Center, or in the Employment Area — Valley. Policy LU-341. Retirement centers that have a medical facility as a component of the services offered should be located in areas of the Commercial Corridor that have Commercial Office zoning. Policy LU-342. Medium and high intensity office should be encouraged as the primary use in Commercial Office zoned areas. Policy LU-343. Retail and services should support the primary office use in areas identified for Commercial Office zoning, and should be located on the ground floor of office and parking structures. Policy LU-344. In the Commercial Office zone, high-rise office development should be limited to ten (10) stories. Fifteen (15) stories may be obtained through a height bonus system. Policy LU-345. Height bonuses of five (5) stories may be allowed for office buildings in designated areas of the Commercial Office zone, under appropriate conditions, where sites provide additional public benefits such as plazas, parks, exceptional landscaping, and/or public art. Objective LU-GGG: Guide redevelopment of land in the Commercial Corridor designation with Commercial Arterial zoning, from the existing strip commercial urban forms into more concentrated forms, in which structures and parking evolve from the existing suburban form, to more efficient urban configurations with cohesive site planning. Policy LU-346. Support the redevelopment of commercial business districts located along principal arterials in the City. Policy LU-347. Implement development standards that encourage lively, attractive, medium to high -density commercial areas. Policy LU-348. Encourage consolidation of individual parcels to maximize flexibility of site design and reduce access points. Policy LU-349. Support development plans incorporating the following features: 1) Shared access points and fewer curb cuts; 2) Internal circulation among adjacent parcels, 3) Shared parking facilities; 4) Allowance for future transition to structured parking facilities; 5) Centralized signage; 6) Unified development concepts, and 7) Landscaping and streetscape that softens visual impacts. Policy LU-350. New development in Commercial Corridor designated areas should be encouraged to implement uniform site standards, including: 1) Minimum lot depth of 200 feet; 2) Maximum height often (10) stories within office zoned designations; 3) Parking preferably at the rear of the building, or on the side as a second choice; 4) Setbacks that would allow incorporating a landscape buffer; 5) Front setback without frontage street or driveway between building and sidewalk; and 6) Common signage and lighting system. Policy LU-351. Identify and map activity nodes located along principal arterials that are the foundation of the Corridors, and guide the development or redevelopment of these nodes as activity areas for the larger corridors so that they enhance their function. Policy LU-352. Development within defined activity nodes should be subject to additional design guidelines as delineated in the development standards. Policy LU-353. Structures at Commercial Corridor intersections should not be set back from the street and sidewalk so as to allow vehicular circulation or parking to be located between the sidewalk and the building. Policy LU-354. Commercial Corridor intersections frequented by pedestrians, due to the nature of nearby uses or transit stops, should feature sidewalk pavement increased to form pedestrian comers and include pedestrian amenities, signage, and special design treatment that would make them identifiable as activity areas for the larger corridor. Policy LU-355. Parking at designated intersections should be in back of structures and not located between structures and the sidewalk or street. Policy LU-356. Structures in Commercial Corridor areas that front sidewalks abutting the principal arterial or are located at activity nodes should be eligible for a height bonus and therefore may exceed the maximum allowable height in the district. Policy LU-357. Public amenity features (e.g. plazas, recreation areas) should be encouraged as part of new development or redevelopment. Policy LU-358. Parking areas should be landscaped (including street trees, buffers, berms), especially along roadways, to reduce visual impacts. Objective LU-HHH: Support methods of increasing accessibility to Commercial Corridor areas for both automobile and transit to support the land use objectives of the district. Pace 56 of 70 Page 57 of 70 Policy LU-359. Support routing of the citywide transit system to Commercial Corridor areas to provide greater access. Policy LU-360. Encourage development proponents to work with the City Transportation Division, King County METRO, and Sound Transit in order to site transit stops within the Commercial Corridor areas. Policy LU-361. Public transportation transit stops located in Commercial Corridor areas should be safe, clean, comfortable, and attractive. Objective LU-111: Ensure quality development in Commercial Office zones. Policy LU-362. Office sites and structures should be designed (e.g. signage; building height, bulk and setback; landscaping; parking) to mitigate adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. Policy LU-363. Parking provided on -site, in parking structures, and either buffered from adjacent uses or incorporated into pedestrian -oriented street design, is preferred. Policy LU-364. In areas developed with high intensity office uses, circulation within the site should be primarily pedestrian -oriented. Policy LU-365. In areas developed with high intensity office uses, vehicular access to the site should be from the primary street with the access points minimized and designed to ease entrance and exit. Policy LU-366. Public amenity features (e.g. parks, plazas, recreation areas), should be encouraged (i.e. through incentives or similar means) as part of every high -intensity office development. Policy LU-367. In areas developed with high intensity office uses, site and building design should be transit-, people-, and pedestrian -oriented. Ground floor uses and design should be pedestrian -oriented. Objective LU-JJJ: Where Commercial Corridor areas intersect other land use designations, recognition of a transition and/or buffer between uses should be incorporated into redevelopment plans. Policy LU-368. Consideration of the scale and building style of near -by residential neighborhoods should be included in development proposals. Policy LU-369. Development should be designed to consider potential adverse impacts on adjacent, less intensive uses, e.g. lighting, landscaping, and setbacks should all be considered during site design. Policy LU-370. Landscape buffers, additional setbacks, reduced height, and screening devices such as berms and fencing should be employed to reduce impacts (e.g. visual, noise, odor, light) on adjacent, less intensive uses. Renton Auto Mall Discussion: The Renton Auto Mall is intended to serve several purposes on behalf of the City and business community. It increases vehicle sales and corresponding tax revenue returned to the City. It has special development standards that are predictable, cohesive, and uniform throughout the District. It is easily accessible from regional interstate transportation systems, and improves and increases values of underdeveloped property The Auto Mall, by providing a District for this concentrated activity, allows land that might otherwise be used for vehicle sales and service to be reutilized more efficiently in other Districts, such as the Urban Center. Additional benefits may accrue to both City residents and people on a regional basis due to the opportunity to comparison shop and conveniently participate in activities related to auto sales and service. Objective LU-KKK: Provide support for a cohesive Commercial Corridor District specifically for the concentration of auto- and vehicular -related businesses in order to increase their revenue and the sales tax base for the City. Policy LU-371. The Renton Auto Mall should be primarily located along SW Grady Way, between Oakesdale Ave. S.W. and Williams Ave. S., but may be expanded beyond this area as warranted. Policy LU-372. The objectives and policies of the Commercial Corridor designation should be implemented by Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning within Auto Mall District A and by the underlying zoning in Auto Mall District B. Objective LU-LLL: In order to further the continued cohesiveness of the Auto Mall Improvement District, a right-of-way improvement plan should be completed, adopted, and implemented by the City in coordination with property owners and auto dealers. Policy LU-373. The coordinated right-of-way improvement plan should address area gateways, signage, landscaping, circulation, and shared access. Policy LU-374. A designated gateway to the Auto Mall District should be made visually distinctive through the use of gateway features. Policy LU-375. In order to facilitate the consolidation of land into a cohesive district, fees and other compensation normally levied for street right-of-way vacation should be waived. Objective LU-MMM: Auto Mall Improvement District development standards, site planning, and project review should further the goal of the City to present an attractive environment for doing regional -scale, auto -related business. Policy LU-376. Landscaping along principal arterials should be uniform from parcel to parcel in order to further the visual cohesiveness of the District. Page 58 of 70 Page 59 of 70 Policy LU-377. On -site landscaping should consist of a minimum two and one half percent (2.5%) of the gross site area. Policy LU-378. On -site landscaping should primarily be located at site entries, in front of buildings, and at other locations with high visibility from public areas. Policy LU-379. Vehicle service areas should not be readily visible from public fights -of - way. Objective LU-NNN: Use of the Auto Mall District by pedestrians should be encouraged by improving safety and creating an attractive, "walkable" business environment. Policy LU-380. Designated walkways should be part of a larger network of pedestrian connections between businesses throughout the district. Policy LU-381. To enhance use of the Auto Mall Improvement District by pedestrians the following features should be used: • Wheel stops or curbs placed to prevent overhang of sidewalks by vehicle bumpers. • Customer parking located and clearly marked near site entries. • Coordinated dealer -to -dealer signage should be developed. NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor Discussion: The AE Sunset Boulevard Corridor is unique in the City due to the highly eclectic mix of commercial and residential uses along its length. These integrated uses, located at a "gateway" to the City, are an appropriate signal to those entering Renton that the community is diverse in many ways. Height limitations in the Development Standards have kept buildings along the NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor at two stories or below, a scale that is generally consistent with the various forms of residential along the corridor. Objective LU-000: A special district should be designated along NE Sunset Boulevard. The purpose of this area would be to make the commercial environment more attractive to local and sub -regional shoppers so that local businesses will be more economically viable and the City's tax base will increase. Implementing code will be put in place within three years of the adoption date for the GMA update. Policy LU-382. Within the NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor, a "Business District" should include the commercial properties along NE Sunset Blvd. from east of Duvall Ave. N.E. to west of Union Ave. N.E. Policy LU-383. The NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor, due to its location on the east boundary of the City, should include City gateway features. Policy LU-384. The NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor, due to its location abutting Highlands Neighborhood Center, should be considered a gateway to that district and feature design elements that are coordinated with, and reflect the nature of the Highlands Neighborhood Center. Policy LU-385. The policies of the Commercial Corridor designation and the NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor should be implemented by Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning. Policy LU-386. Vehicle sales businesses existing in the NE Sunset Boulevard Business Corridor should be encouraged to relocate to the Renton Auto Mall District. Northeast Fourth Corridor Discussion: The Northeast Fourth Corridor is an active commercial area located at a gateway to the City. It features a wide variety of retail and service uses and several different structural forms from small professional offices to large-scale strip malls with major grocery anchors. Annexations of land into the City to the east of this commercial area and subsequent development of large single family housing projects has increased the market area for the Northeast Fourth Corridor considerably in recent years. Objective LU-PPP: A special commercial area should be designated along Northeast Fourth Street. The purpose of this area would be to enhance the commercial environment to increase revenue of local businesses and the City's tax base. Policy LU-387. Within the Northeast Fourth Corridor, the "Business District" should and extend from west of Monroe Ave NE to Field Ave N.E. Policy LU-388. The policies of the Commercial Corridor designation and the Northeast Fourth Corridor Business District should be implemented by Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning. Objective LU-QQQ: The Northeast Fourth Corridor Business District should be enhanced to improve efficiency, safety and attractiveness to both potential shoppers and pass -through traffic. Policy LU-389. Due to its location at a key entrance to the City from the east, the Northeast Fourth Corridor Business District should include gateway features. Policy LU-390. The Northeast Fourth Business District should be enhanced with boulevard design features such as landscaped center of road medians for the purpose of improving safety through traffic control and slowing traffic for pedestrian safety and improved conditions for vehicles leaving and entering the principal arterial. Policy LU-391. To the extent possible, undeveloped parcels and pads and/or redevelopment in the Northeast Fourth Corridor Business District should feature street - facing building facades located a maximum of fifteen (15) feet set back from the non - curb edge of sidewalks abutting the principal arterial. Policy LL'-392. In the :Northeast Fourth Business Corridor Business District, where buildings are set back more than fifteen (15) feet from the principal arterial, new development or redevelopment should: Paue 60 of 70 Page 61 of 70 1. Contribute a furnished public gathering space, abutting the sidewalk along the principal arterial, of no less than 1,000 square feet with a minimum dimension of twenty (20) feet on one side. Such space should have landscaping, including street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian -scaled lighting and seating, at a minimum. 2. Designate appropriate site(s) for future pad development for additional commercial structures located to conform to maximum setback requirements. Puget Corridor Discussion: The Puget Corridor is a commercial area along a busy arterial, bordered by multifamily development. It features a mix of retail, office, and service uses. Objective LU-VW: A special commercial area should be designated along South Puget Drive. The purpose of this area would be to enhance the commercial environment to increase revenue of local businesses and the City's tax base. Policy LU-406. Within the Puget Corridor, the "Business District" should and extend from the intersection of Puget Drive and Benson Road S to the I405 overpass. Policy LU-407, The policies of the Commercial Corridor designation and the Puget Business District should be implemented by Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning. Policy LU-408. Due to its location at a key entrance to the City from the south, the Puget Business District should include gateway features. Automall (map) NE Sunset Blvd Business District (revised map) NE 4'6 Business District (revised map) Rainier Business District (map) Puget Business District (map) COMMERCIAIJOFFICE/RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The Commercial/Office/Residential (COR) designation provides opportunities for large-scale office, commercial retail and multi -family projects developed through a master plan and site plan process incorporation significant site amenities and/or gateway features. COR sites are typically transitions from an industrial use to a more intensive land use. The sites offer redevelopment opportunities on Lake Washington and/or the Cedar River. Objective LU-WWW: Development at Commercial/Office/Residential designations should be cohesive, high quality, landmark developments that are integrated with natural amenities. The intention is to create a compact, urban development with high amenity values that creates a prominent identity. Policy LU-409, Designate Commercial/Office/Residential in locations meeting the following criteria: 1) There is the potential for redevelopment, or a sufficient amount of vacant land to encourage significant concentration of development; 2) The COR site could function as a gateway to the City; 3) COR sites should be located on major transit and transportation routes; and 4) The COR location has significant amenity value, such as water access, that can support landmark development. Policy LU-410. Consistent with the locational criteria, Commercial/Office/Residential designations may be placed on property adjacent to, or abutting, residential, commercial industrial designations or publicly owned properties. COR designations next to higher intensity zones such as industrial, or next to public uses, may provide a transition to less intense designations in the vicinity. Site design of COR should consider the long-term retention of adjacent or abutting industrial or public uses. Policy LU-411. Uses in Commercial/Office/Residential designations should include mixed -use complexes consisting of office, and/or residential uses, cultural facilities, hotel and convention center type development, technology research and development facilities; and corporate headquarters. Policy LU-412. Commercial uses such as retail and services should support the primary uses of the site and be architecturally and functionally integrated into the development. Policy LU-413. Commercial development, excluding big -box, may be a primary use in a Commercial/Office/Residential designation, if: 1) It provides significant economic value to the City; 2) It is sited in conjunction with small-scale, multiple businesses in a "business district;" 3) It is designed with the scale and intensity envisioned for the COR; and 4) It is part of a proposed master plan development. Policy LU-414. Individual properties may have a single use if they can be developed at the scale and intensity envisioned for the designation Commercial/Office/Residential project, or if proposed as part of a phased development and multi -parcel proposal that includes a mix of uses. Page 62 of 70 Paae 63 of 70 Policy LU-415. Structured parking should be required. If lack of financial feasibility can be demonstrated at the time of the COR development, phased structured parking should be accommodated in the proposed master plan. Policy LU-416. Sites that have significant limitations on redevelopment due to environmental, access, and/or land assembly constraints should be granted flexibility of use combinations and development standards through the master plan process. Policy LU-417. Private/public partnerships should be encouraged to provide infrastructure development, transportation facilities, public uses, and amenities. Policy LU-418. Adjacent properties within a designated COR should be combined for master planning purposes and public review regardless of ownership. Policy LU-419. Master plans should coordinate the mix and compatibility of uses, residential density, conceptual building, site and landscape design, identification of gateway features, signs, circulation, transit opportunities, and phasing regardless of ownership of individual parcels. Policy LU-420. Maximum residential density at COR designated sites should range between 30 to 50 dwelling units per acre. The same area used for commercial and office development may also be used to calculate residential density. Policy LU-421. CommerciaUOffice/Residential master plans should be guided by design criteria specific to the location, context, and scale of the designated COR. COR Design Guidelines should fully integrate signage, building height, bulk, setbacks, landscaping, and parking considerations for the various components of each proposed project within the COR development. Policy LU-422. Internally, Commercial/Office/Residential developments should be primarily pedestrian -oriented. Internal site circulation of vehicles should be separated from pedestrians wherever feasible by dedicated walkways. Policy LU-423. Primary vehicular access to COR development should be from principal arterials Internal streets should be sized hierarchically. Curb cuts should not conflict with pedestrian routes, if possible. Policy LU-424. Commercial/Office/Residential developments should have a combination of internal and external site design features, such as: 1) Public plazas; 2) Prominent architectural features; 3) Public access to natural features or views; 4) Distinctive focal features; 5) Indication of the function as a gateway, if appropriate; 6) Structured parking; and 7) Other features meeting the spirit and intent of the COR designation. COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement. The purpose of Commercial Neighborhood designation is to provide small scale, low -intensity commercial areas located within neighborhoods primarily for the convenience of residents who live nearby. Uses should be those that provide goods and services. In addition, a limited amount of residential opportunities should be provided Objective LU-XXX: Commercial Neighborhood designated areas are intended to reduce traffic volumes, permit small-scale business uses, such as commercial/retail, professional office, and services that serve the personal needs of the immediate population in surrounding neighborhoods. Policy LU-425. The Commercial Neighborhood designation should be implemented by Commercial Neighborhood zoning. Policy LU426. Commercial Neighborhood designated areas should be located 1) Within one -quarter mile of existing and planned residential areas; 2) To the extent possible, outside of the trade areas of other small-scale commercial uses offering comparable goods and services; and 3) Contiguous to a street no smaller than those classified at the collector level. Policy LU-427. Commercial Neighborhood designated areas should not increase in scale or size to the point of changing the character of the nearby residential neighborhood. Policy LU-428. The small-scale uses of Commercial Neighborhood designated areas should not increase in intensity so that the character of the commercial area or that of the nearby residential area is changed. Policy LU-429. A mix ofuses (e.g. convenience retail, consumer services, offices, residential) should be encouraged in small-scale commercial developments within Commercial Neighborhood designated areas. Policy LU-430. Commercial Neighborhood designated areas should consist primarily of retail and/or service uses. Policy LU-431. Products and services related to large-scale motorized machinery, vehicles, or equipment should not be allowed in Commercial Neighborhood designated areas. Nor should uses that result in emissions, noise, or other potential nuisance conditions be allowed in such areas. Policy LU-432. Residential uses should be located above the ground floor, limited to no more than four units per structure and should be secondary to retail and services uses. Pace 64 of 70 Paae 65 of 70 Policy LU433. Commercial structures in Commercial Neighborhood designated areas should be compatible with nearby residential areas in height, frontyard setbacks, lot coverage, building design, and use. XI. EMPLOYMENT AREAS Goal: Achieve a mix of land uses including industrial, high technology, office, and commercial activities in Employment Areas that lead to economic growth and a strengthening of Renton's employment base. Discussion: These policies are designed to ensure that Renton will have adequate reserves of land and appropriate use designations to further its economic development efforts. Adequate land is necessary to attract new businesses in an effort to expand and diversify, and stabilize the employment base. There are two Employment Area Land Use Designations: Employment Area — Industrial Employment Area — Valley Flexibility is encouraged in the Employment Areas by allowing a range of uses and multiple users on sites. Research and development businesses may need to evolve into production and distribution facilities as products are developed and receive approval for marketing. A flexible approach can facilitate business development and stimulate creation of nodes of employment activity supported by commercial and service uses. Objective LU-YYY: Encourage economic growth resulting in greater diversity and stability in the employment and tax bases by providing adequate land capacity through zoning amounts of land to meet the needs of future employers. Policy LU-434. The City should endeavor to expand its present economic base, emphasizing new technologies, research and development facilities, science parks, and high-technology centers, and supporting commercial and office land uses. Policy LU-435. In each employment designation, an appropriate mix of commercial, office, light industrial, and industrial uses should be supported. The mix will vary depending on the employment area emphasis. Policy LU-436. Encourage flexibility in use and reuse of existing, conforming structures to allow business to evolve in response to market and production requirements. Policy LU-437. Support location of commercial and service uses in proximity to office or industrial uses to develop nodes of employment supported by services. Objective LU-ZZZ: Promote the development of low impact, light industrial uses, particularly those within the high-technology category, in Employment Area -Valley and Employment Area -Industrial designations where potentially adverse impacts can be mitigated. Policy LU-438. Site planning review should ensure that light industrial uses are neither intrusive nor adversely affected by other uses nearby. EMPLOYMENT AREA -INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The Employment Area Industrial designation is intended to provide continued opportunity for mamrfacturing and industrial uses that create a strong employment base in the City. Discussion: Although location is an important factor for all types of development, it is especially critical for industrial development. Industries need good access in areas with low traffic volumes. As the City becomes more urban, they need assurance that incompatible uses will not be allowed that could eventually force them to relocate. Other uses, especially residential, also want to ensure that industries do not impact their neighborhoods with noise, traffic, and other nuisances and hazards. For these reasons, although commercial areas may see more diversity and mixing of uses, industrial areas will remain somewhat isolated from other uses. Objective LU-AAAA: Sustain industrial areas that function as integrated employment activity areas and include a core of industrial uses and other related businesses and services, transit facilities, and amenities. Policy LU-439. The primary use in the Employment Area - Industrial designation should be industrial. Policy LU-440. A mix of offices, light industrial, warehousing, and manufacturing should be encouraged in the Employment Area -Industrial classification, with conditions as appropriate. Policy LU-441. Industrial uses with a synergistic relationship should be encouraged to locate in close proximity to one another. Policy LU-442. Industrial parks that provide space for several related or unrelated, but compatible users should be encouraged to: 1) Include more than one industrial use organized into a single development; 2) Share facilities such as parking, transit facilities, recreation facilities, and amenities; 3) Include properties in more than one ownership; 4) Locate in areas with adequate regional access to minimize their impacts on the local street network; and 5) Organize the site plan to place building fronts to the street with service and parking screened from the front. Policy LU-443. Existing industrial activities may create noise, chemicals, odors, or other potentially noxious off -site impacts. Within the Employment Area -Industrial designation existing industrial activities should be protected. Although the designation allows a wide Page 66 of 70 Page 67 of 70 range and mix of uses, new businesses that would be impacted by pre-existing industrial activities should be discouraged. Policy LU-444. When more intensive new uses are proposed for locations in close proximity to less intensive existing uses, the responsibility for mitigating any adverse impacts should be the responsibility of the new use. Policy LU-445. Off -site impacts from industrial development such as noise, odors, light and glare, surface and ground water pollution, and air quality should be controlled through setbacks, landscaping, screening and/or fencing, drainage controls, environmental mitigation, and other techniques. Policy LU-446. Light industrial uses that result in noise or odors, should be located in the Employment Area -Industrial designation. EMPLOYMENT AREA -VALLEY LAND USE DESIGNATION Purpose Statement: The purpose of the Employment Area -Valley designation is to allow the gradual transition of the Valley from traditional industrial and warehousing uses to more intensive retail service and office activities. The intent is to allow these new activities without making industrial uses non -conforming and without restricting the ability of existing businesses to expand Objective LU-BBBB: Provide for a mix ofemployment-based uses, including commercial, office, and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. Policy LU-447. Develop the Green River Valley ("The Valley") and the Black River Valley (located between Sunset Blvd and SW Grady Way) areas as places for a range and variety of commercial, office, and industrial. Policy LU-448. Non -employment -based uses, such as residential, are prohibited in the Employment Area Valley. Policy LU-449. Multi -story office uses should be located in areas most likely to be served by future multi -modal transportation opportunities. A greater emphasis on public amenities is appropriate for this type of use. Policy LU-450. Developments should be encouraged to achieve greater efficiency in site utilization and result in benefits to users with techniques including: 1) Shared facilities such as parking and site access, recreation facilities and amenities; 2) An improved ability to serve development with transit by centralizing transit stops; and 3) An opportunity to provide support services (e.g. copy center, coffee shop or lunch facilities, express mail services) for nearby development that otherwise might not exist. Policy LU-451. Uses such as research, design, and development facilities should be allowed in office designations and industrial designations when potential adverse impacts to surrounding uses can be mitigated. Policy LU452. Recognize viable existing and allow new industrial uses in the Valley, while promoting the gradual transition of uses on sites with good access and visibility to more intensive commercial and office use. Objective LU-CCCC: Provide flexibility in the regulatory processes by allowing a variety of zoning designations in the Employment Area -Valley designation. Policy LU-453. Changes from one zone to another should be considered to achieve a balance of uses that substantially improves the City's economic / employment base. Factors such as increasing the City's tax base, improving efficiency in the use of the land, and the ability of a proposed land use to mitigate potential adverse land use impacts should be considered. Policy LU-454. Commercial Arterial (CA) should be supported only when the proposed commercial use has access to SW 43rd Street, and/or East Valley Road south of SW 27th Street or is located north of I405 and south of 10th Avenue SW and the area under consideration is part of a designation totaling over 5 acres (acreage may be in separate ownerships). Policy LU-455. Zoning supporting industrial uses should be established when a mix or wider range of uses is not yet appropriate for a site. Policy LU-456. Properties lying between SR-167 and East Valley Road from SW 22nd Street to SW 41st Street should not be granted an industrial zone classification that is more intensive than Light Industrial in order to avoid the potential for degradation of the high visibility SR 167 corridor. Policy LU-457. Commercial Office zoning should be supported where a site has high visibility, particularly in those portions of the Valley that are gateways and/or along the I- 405 and SR 167 corridors, where larger sites can accommodate more intensive uses, and where sites can take advantage of existing and/or future multi -modal transportation opportunities. Objective LU-DDDD: Ensure quality development in Employment Area -Valley Policy LU-458. Street trees and landscaping should be required for new development within the Valley to provide an attractive streetscape in areas subjected to a transition of land uses (Refer to the Community Design Element). Policy LU-459. Vehicular connections between adjacent parking areas are encouraged. Incentives should be offered to encourage shared parking. Policy LU-460. Site design for office uses and commercial, and mixed -use developments should consider ways of improving transit ridership through siting, locating of pedestrian amenities, walkways, parking, etc. Page 68 of 70 Noe Fo of 7n Policy LU-461. Site plan review should be required for all new projects in the Employment Area -Valley pursuant to thresholds established in the City's development regulations. Policy LU-462. New development, or site redevelopment, should conform to development standards that include scale of building, building facade treatment to reduce perception of bulk, relationship between buildings, and landscaping. i yr RCIV I VIV Comprehensive Plan ow.__ Land Use Map _ ®GooriBo �uax.��mfr+aeMc.MWal AngKYl.nnin8 ��c........ _—_ �. on,.o 7n .d 7n ATTACHMENT D TABLE OF CONTENTS UTILITIES ELEMENT GOAL Facilitate the development and maintenance of all utilities at the appropriate levels of service to accommodate the growth that is anticipated in the City of Renton. Page 1 of 41 Page 2 of 41 Summary: The Utilities Element guides future utility service within the greater Renton area. It helps ensure that adequate utilities will be available to both existing and new development. It also ensures that utility improvements will be used to help implement the Comprehensive Plan and will be phased according to community priorities. The Utilities Element indicates how utility improvements can be used to maintain equitable levels of service, guarantee public health and safety, and serve new development in a timely manner. In addition, the Utilities Element defines how to minimize the detrimental impacts of utility improvements on surrounding development as well as the community as a whole. The Utilities Elements looks to promote efficiency in the provision or improvement of service wherever appropriate and feasible. in addition, it asks that the costs of improvements should be distributed in an equitable manner. Beyond the City's existing boundaries, the Utilities Element fosters coordination with regional and adjacent utility systems. It also guides the provision of services to areas outside of the City, but within the City's planning area especially in cases of annexation. The City of Renton provides water, wastewater, and storm water utility services for citizens residing within the city limits and by agreement with other purveyors for some areas located outside of the City's boundaries. Renton contracts with a private hauler for collection of solid waste and residential recycling. Other utility services that affect the City include: cable television, conventional telephone, fiber optic cable systems, cellular telephone service, natural gas, petroleum products, and electricity. (See the Annexation Section of the Land Use Element, the Stormwater Section of the Environmental Element and the Capital Facilities Element for additional policies related to the Utilities Element.) General Policies Discussion: The follawing general policies are designed to ensure that utility services are safely and efficiently provided, and are constructed in an environmentally sound manner that reasonably mitigates impacts on adjacent land uses. The policies also emphasize cooperation and coordination with other agencies, jurisdictions, and purveyors to create and maintain utilities. Objective U-A: Provide an adequate level of public utilities in response to and consistent with land use, protection of the environment, and annexation goals and policies. Policy U-1. Utility facilities and services should be consistent with the growth and development concepts directed by the Comprehensive Plan. Policy U-2. Promote the collocation of new public and private utility distribution lines with planned or pre-existing systems (both above and below ground) in joint trenches and/or right-of-ways where environmentally, technically, economically, and legally feasible. Policy U-3. Process permits and approvals for utilities and facilities in a fair and timely manner and in accord with development regulations that encourage predictability. Policy U-4. Strive to protect the health and safety of Renton citizens from recognized harmful effects of utility generated environmental hazards. Policy U-5. Encourage the appropriate siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land uses. Policy U-6. Where appropriate, encourage conservation in coordination with other utilities and jurisdictions. Policy U-7. Continue to encourage the coordination of non -emergency utility trenching activities and street repair to reduce impacts on mobility, aesthetics, noise, and other disruptions. Policy U-8. Continue to coordinate the construction and replacement of City -managed utilities with other public and private infrastructure. in order to minimize construction related disruptions and contain costs. Policy U-9. Where appropriate, work cooperatively with other jurisdictions to ensure that reliable and cost-effective utilities are available to meet increasing demands resulting from local and regional growth. Policy U-10. Where appropriate require reasonable landscape screening of site -specific aboveground utility facilities in order to diminish visual impacts. City -Managed Utilities Policy U-11. Identify utility capacity needed to accommodate growth prior to annexation. Do not annex areas where adequate utility capacity cannot be provided. Discussion: The following general policies are designed to ensure that utility services are provided concurrently with new development. The policies are designed to prevent unplanned, disorderly land development, which can demand costly infrastructure upgrades and expensive temporary solutions. Annexation policies related to utility provision are intended to create a strong connection between land use and infrastructure implementation programs. City utilityfacilities expansion is intended to further the long-term development goals of the City rather than to promote extension of the utility system of a separate entity. Objective U-B: Provide and maintain safe, reliable and adequate utility facilities and services for the City's current and future service area to meet peak -anticipated demands of the City in an efficient, economic, and environmentally responsible manner. Policy U-12. Approval of development should be conditioned on utility systems with capacity to serve the development, without decreasing locally established levels of service being in place or with a financial commitment to provide service within a specified time frame. Policy U-13. Coordinate the extension of utility services with expected growth and development. Policy U-14. Apply level of service standards consistently throughout the service area for city - owned or managed utilities. If necessary, this level - of -service standard may be phased -in over time. Policy U-15. Preference should be given to capital facility improvements that will support the development and redevelopment of the Downtown, mixed -use centers, the Urban Center, and other high growth areas concurrent with anticipated growth. Policy U-16. Encourage the use of water and energy conservation technologies throughout the City. Policy U-17. Timely and orderly extension of City provided utility services (water, sanitary sewer, surface water, solid waste) should be provided within the City's existing and firture service areas to meet public health and safety requirements. Policy U-18. Water, sewer, and storm water facilities and services should be in place prior to occupancy of development projects. Policy U-19. Implementation and coordination programs for the improvement, phasing and financing of water, sewer, and storm water infrastructure should be developed consistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy U-20. All development should be required to pay an equitable share of construction costs for improvements to utility systems for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water necessitated by that development. When utility improvements will provide a general public benefit, the City may contribute funds for the construction of improvements to utility systems to support the public interest. Page 3 of 41 Page 4 of 41 Policy U-21. Upon annexation, if there is a threat tc health and safety, the City may require upgrading of the deficient infrastructure as a condition of the annexation. Policy U-22. The City shall not be responsible for funding the immediate upgrading of utility systems located in annexed areas. At such time that the existing infrastntcture is replaced, upgraded or extended, the new infrastructure must conform to City of Renton standards. Policy U-23. When an annexation encompasses property served by a utility district, and that district continues to provide service, that district will be required to execute a franchise agreement with the City in order to operate within the City. Policy U-24. The owners of all properties, located in unincorporated portions of the Renton Planning Area and outside of municipal service areas, should Non -City Managed Utilities agree to develop in accordance with specified City development standards, if granted City utilities. Exceptions would be allowed in the cases of threats to public health and safety. Policy U-24.1. The owners of all properties located in unincorporated King County that are within Renton's Potential Annexation Area (PAA) that receive City water services should be required to sign a covenant to annex. Policy U-25. Pursue future annexation of all lands that have recorded covenants to annex or that receive City water and sewer service using the 60% Assessed Valuation method of direct petition or other methods that allow for the enforcement of covenants not to oppose future annexation. Policy U-26. In the event of a threat to public health and safety, the City utilities may use utility resources to prevent or mitigate such threats. Discussion: The following policies are designed to ensure Renton is aware of proposed ran -city managed utilityfacility upgrades and that utility purveyors are fully aware of the City's needs. Objective U-C: Ensure non -City managed utilities provide service commensurate with required state -mandated public service obligations and established safety and welfare standards. Policy U-27. Coordinate data exchange with utility planners for use with the City of Renton's geographic information system. Policy U-28. Upon renewal, all franchise agreements should be reviewed for compliance with the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan and the State of Washington Growth Management Act. Policy U-29. New telecommunications and electric utility distribution lines should be installed underground within the City where practical in accordance with rules, regulations, and tariffs applicable to the serving utility. Policy U-30. New or reconstructed structures, towers, and transmission lines should be designed to minimize aesthetic impacts appropriate to their surroundings whenever practical. Policy U-31. Coordinate periodic updating of the utility element and relevant implementing development regulations with adjacent jurisdictions and purveyors. Polity U-32. Encourage the exchange of information relevant to public and private planning processes. Polity U-33. Recognize and continue to allow existing utility facilities that may have regional significance within the City, consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. Policy U-34. Ensure that development regulations are consistent with and do not otherwise impair the fulfillment of the serving utilities' public service obligations. Page 5 of 41 Water Supply Background The Renton Water Utility is operated as a self-supporting enterprise utility under the direction of the Mayor and City Council. Operations are guided by policies of the City of Renton Comprehensive Water System Plan, 1998. (Update scheduled for adoption in 2005.) City of Renton Utility Service Area The City of Renton's Water Utility System provides service to an area approximately 16 square miles in size, and to more than 14,700 customer accounts (Figure 2-1). In addition, the City supplies water on a wholesale basis to the Bryn Mawra akeridge Water District through a single metered connection. Boundaries of the water service area are defined by the City and approved by King County, The City's service area boundaries are not necessarily the same as the corporate boundaries of the City. Agreements between Renton and adjacent purveyors allow Renton to serve some areas outside of the city limits and provide for other districts to serve limited areas within Renton's corporate limit. Existing City Water Supply Facilities Within City Limits Current active and primary water supply sources include five wells drawing water from the Cedar Valley aquifer, three wells from the Maplewood aquifer and one artesian spring. The wells provide eighty-six percent (86%) of the City's water production. in addition, the City maintains seven metered backup water supply interties with Seattle Public Utilities, one emergency intertie with the City of Kent and one emergency intertie with the City of Tukwila. Water treatment consists of chlorination, fluoridation, and corrosion control. As a result of Renton's topography, Renton's service area encompasses twelve hydraulically distinct pressure zones. A system of booster pump stations and pressure reducing stations allow water transfer between zones. Currently there are eight reservoirs in the City's water supply system, strategically located to provide adequate equalizing and fire flow storage. Pressure reducing valves are used to supply lower pressure zones from higher - pressure zones that contain water reservoirs. Capacity of Existing Facilities City's active wells and Springbrook Springs currently provide 11,900 gallons per minute (gpm) or 17.14 million gallons per day (mgd). The back up Maplewood wells and emergency well can deliver an additional 7,000 gpm or 10.08 mgd. Together, active, standby, and emergency wells provide 18,900 gpm or 27.22 mgd. Emergency interties with neighboring cities and water districts can provide 12,000 gpm or 17.28 mgd. The Washington State Department of Health has established guidelines for estimating the amount of supply necessary for adequate water supply. Based on composite growth forecasts, the City has sufficient on-line supply capacity to meet demands through at least 2020. Forecasted Conditions - City of Renton City of Renton Future Water Utility Service Needs The following forecasts are based on Puget Sound Regional Council projections, which have been allocated by the City of Renton, based on local assumptions. Expected increases in population will result in a total of 61,694 Page 6 of 41 persons (or 26,940 households) living within the current city limits by the year 2010; and, 77,752 persons (or 29,128 households) in the annexation area. The total forecast population of Renton's Planning Area is expected to be 139,446 persons (or 60,893 households) by 2010. The total projected maximum day demand by 2010 of about 19.9 mgd is anticipated and provided for in the adopted and approved 1998 Renton Comprehensive Water System Plan. The completion of the Maplewood wells, booster pump station and water treatment facility in 1998 should produce adequate quantities of water to accommodate projected growth, provided the City's existing supply is not lost through contamination or some other unforeseen event. City 4Renlon Future Source 4Supply Water demand will continue to increase as the City's population grows. In response, the City has rehabilitated one emergency well in the Cedar Valley aquifer and developed three others on the Maplewood aquifer. If no other supply sources are developed, the additional supply from the three wells will adequately meet demands until at least 2020, Figure 2-1 Water System Plan Page 7 of 41 Page 8 of 41 Figure 2-2 Existing Water System 1%newel .ss rR.e.. rsx crrY of aErrrox Weer S"—PI- sm Im ne.w.i ew fso ne.weue. EXISTING WATER SYSTEM l'ro nee,. rm rav sexes mm �nn�rie: u.ru+� Page 9 of 41 Discussion: Groundwater is Renton's primary source of drinking water. Nearly all of the City's water supply comes from the shallow Cedar Valley Aquifer and from Springbrook Springs. Development ofgroundwater supply has been successful in that it has provided substantial volumes of very high quality water. It is assumed that the potential for increased withdrawal rates is possible and that the aquifer is the City's best source of long-term water supply. The Cedar Valley aquifer is shallow and is covered by permeable material Therefore, potential contamination problems exist from industrial, commercial, and residential development in the aquifer recharge area and from the transportation of contaminants through the aquifer area. Groundwater contamination would directly and immediately affect all Renton water customers. The Renton City Council has ranked aquifer protection as its number one priority, and it is the single most important issue in providing a reliable water supply to the service area. The City must assure that water supplies will be adequate to serve future growth. This can be accomplished through prudent use ofcurrent sources, the acquisition ofnew sources, and water reuse programs. In Renton, thousands ofgallons a day of high quality drinking water are currently expended in applications for which reclaimed water is a possible substitute. The cost of treating effluent for reuse is generally less than acquiring and developing potable water supply for non potable uses. Using reclaimed water also improves the quality of water bodies by reducing the amount of of fluent discharged into them from wastewater treatment plants. Renton is integrating a reuse program into its water resource management program. The maximum level of sustainable draw from the City's groundwater system is not currently known. Therefore, it would not be prudent to commit Renton's potable water resources to supplying future growth in areas outside of Renton's present city limits when other service options are available. Obligating the City to provide unincorporated areas with water might impede annexations. This policy direction is not intended to preclude provision to neighboring areas prompted by emergency conditions. These policies will help the City ensure that adequate water supply is available to serve all portions of the municipal .service area at adopted standards. Objective U-D: Provide, protect, and maintain a consistent, ample, and safe water supply for the City and future service areas. Policy U-35. Protect water resources to assure continued long-term, high quality groundwater and artesian spring water supplies. Policy U-36. Ensure that there is an adequate supply of high quality potable water to meet current and future water needs. Policy U-37. The intensity and type of development should be limited in the Aquifer Protection Area to those types of development that do not create adverse impacts on the aquifer. Policy U-38. Designate and protect areas of aquifer recharge within the City's Potential Annexation Area boundary. Policy U-39. Water supply sources (i.e. wells, and Springbrook Springs) should be protected from uses and activities that have been determined to be hazardous to these sources. Policy U-40. Continue to promote the efficient and responsible use of water through conservation and public education programs. Policy U-41. New alternative source supplies of potable water should be developed through wells or other sources. Policy U'42. The City's Water Utility will strive to meet maximum day demand during a reasonable "worst case" supply system failure. Page 10 of 41 Policy U43. Coordinate with the regional wastewater purveyor to develop programs to substitute reclaimed wastewater for potable water in landscape watering, heating and cooling buildings, and other safe uses, whenever practical. Policy U-44. The availability of adequate fire flow should be assured prior to the issuance of commercial or industrial building pewits or the approval of residential subdivisions. Policy U45. Allow extensions of water service without annexation, to areas outside of the city limits: 1) when such areas are within the City's water service area, or 2) when no other reasonable service is available AND it is determined by the City and/or State Department of Health that a public health emergency exists or is imminent. Polity U-46. Renton Water Utility will serve areas annexed to the City that do not have existing municipal supply. Policy U47. Renton will not supply water to areas annexed with other existing municipal water suppliers and water districts. Polity U48. Renton will use water service boundaries, established by agreement as a result of regional coordinated water system plans and agreements with neighboring cities and water districts. Wastewater System Policy U49. Renton will follow state guidelines in assuming portions of adjacent water systems as a result of annexation. Policy U-50. Continue to actively participate in regional supply forums in order to reduce the cost of service and improve reliability, quantity and water quality. Policy U-51. Pursue the elimination of all supply from the Seattle Cedar River Transmission Pipelines, and supply all customers within the Water System's service area from the City's supply sources. However, the Seattle supply meters will remain operational to provide emergency supply if it is necessary. Policy U-52. Areas annexed with existing municipal water supply should be responsible for the costs of utility system improvements needed to raise the level of service to City standards. These upgrades may be phased over time if necessary. Policy U-53. The City may defer compliance with Renton Water Standards in the case of temporary or emergency water service. Policy U-54. Utilize water conservation and reuse programs to ensure adequate water supply to meet the essential needs of the community. Discussion: Septic systems are not appropriate means of providing wastewater service in urban or aquifer protection areas. Therefore, these policies support the provision ofprimary wastewater service through an extensive sanitary sewer system throughout the municipal service area. This system is intended to serve both new and existing development in a manner consistent with planned land uses and at an appropriate level of service. Service by the sanitary sewer system should be in place at the time of development. Existing Conditions The Renton Wastewater Utility is operated as a self-supporting enterprise utility under the direction of the Mayor and CityCouncil. Operations are guided by policies of the City of Renton Long -Range Wastewater Management Plan (current version adopted October, 1999). City of Renton Utility Service Area Renton's sanitary sewer service is provided by the City's Wastewater Utility. Portions of Renton are served b} adjacent water and sewer districts, under imerlocal agreements. Boundaries separating the City's sewer service area from adjacent districts have been agreed upon by the purveyors and the City. It has been Renton's policy to allow these districts to continue to serve areas after annexation by Renton until assumption of service to these areas is logical, in accordance with state law, and in the City's interest. Figure 3-1 shows existing service areas for Renton and adjacent districts. The City of Renton Wastewater Utility serves approximately 13,800 customers (residential and business) which includes approximately ninety-five percent (95%) of the City's population and eighty-five (85%) percent of the City's land area. The remaining five percent (5%) of the population currently uses private, on -site, wastewater disposal systems. General Description of Existing City Wastewater Facilities The City of Renton is divided into seven major wastewater collection basins, each of which consists of one or more sub -basins. For the most part, these collection basins and sub -basins follow the natural drainage patterns of the Renton service area. Where the collection basins do not follow the natural drainage patterns, it is typically due to lack of downstream facilities and the need to pump from a given point into an adjacent drainage basin. Renton's sanitary sewer system consists of about 184 miles of gravity sewers, 23 lift stations with associated force mains, and approximately 3,400 manholes. Wastewater is discharged to regional facilities (King County) at over 70 locations within the City's service area. The sewage is then conveyed to King County's South Plant at Renton. Currently, King Counties wastewater treatment consists of primary treatment, secondary treatment, and bio-solids processing. The location of Renton's sewer interceptors and lift stations, as well as King County's sewer trunk lines and treatment facility, are shown on Figure 3-2. Capacity of Existing City Wastewater Facilities Computer hydraulic modeling of the City's system has revealed that facilities in several basins are near capacity. These areas are addressed in the Long -Range Wastewater Management Plan and the Six -Year Wastewater Capital Improvement Program. In addition, there is a capacity issue related to King County's handling of flows. During peak flows, King County will use its interceptors for storage of wastewater and for controlling flows in the South Treatment Plant in Renton. This results in wastewater backing up into King County interceptors. King County reserves the right to allow wastewater to back up in its interceptors to an elevation of 25 feet. Although King County has never reached this extreme, King County's storage of wastewater in its interceptors has caused Renton's sewers to surcharge (back up) in low-lying areas through manhole covers and back up side sewer connections into homes and businesses. Reliability of Existing City Wastewater Facilities Problems associated with the City's gravity sewer system include the age of the system, improper construction or settlement, penetration by tree roots, and grease buildup. The 23 lift stations operated by the City pose a different kind of reliability problem. Unlike gravity sewers, lift stations are subject to power and mechanical failures, and thus are less reliable. They also require higher maintenance and operation costs and cause increased adverse impacts on downstream facilities. Some lift stations are in need of replacement because of age and deterioration. Other stations are in good shape, however, they lack some of the safety or reliability features required under current codes. Page 11 of 41 Page 12 of 41 t ♦ 1 uERceR „x. ISLAND -- r SEATME J � + ti• ?' TtTKIVIL r: 5✓� ((�� ' I Figure 3-2 NEWCASZ_ — t ^ SANITARY SEWER TRUNK LINES v •t i C�f�l r j i KENT • Lift stations i —o-- Metro Trudy Lines i City of Renton interceptors 40 Metro's East Division Reclarostion Plant City Limits Urban Growth Boundary - Sphereoflntluence 0 1000 12000 1:72,000 Note: For graphic presentation only Facilities are not to scale. ��!aa�� LONG RANGE PLANNING •• 0. .� �, D. YyM . D. E04 20 SM—bn 2004 Forecasted Conditions Future Capacity of Facilities The wastewater collection system currently has no capacity restraints. However, continued development within the Lake Washington East Basin will require that additional capacity be provided by means of the Sunset Interceptor. These improvements are currently scheduled in the Wastewater Six -year Capital Improvement Program. The most significant amount of increased flow is anticipated to occur in the East Cedar River Basin. Sufficient capacity exists within this basin to accommodate this anticipated growth due to the construction of the East Renton Interceptor in the mid-1990s. Significant additional growth will also continue to occur within the West Cedar River, Black River, and Lake Washington West Basins. The current modeling of the system shows sufficient capacity to accommodate this growth as well. The utility is currently developing a new hydraulic model to update its modeling to fit recently completed flow analysis performed system wide as part of King County's Regional Inflow and Infiltration Study, scheduled for completion in early 2005. This update to the program will help the utility to better understand what, if any, additional capacity restraints may exist within its system. The City of Renton has several agreements with adjacent utilities that allow joint use of facilities within the City. Adjacent utility systems' comprehensive plans predict the future capacity they will need when they convey wastewater through Renton. However, adjustments to the City's interceptors may need to be made as these systems further clarify their needs. While these agreements restrict the volume of wastewater discharged to the joint use facilities, if wastewater flows from adjacent upstream utilities exceed the agreed upon flows, then capacity problems could occur. Reduction of inflow and infiltration in Renton's collection system will help to make additional capacity available for anticipated growth and development. This will also reduce King County's need to make expensive additions or improvements to increase the capacity of their treatment and conveyance facilities. King County's adopted wastewater plan, based on Puget Sound Regional Council population and employment projections, includes system improvements necessary to meet service levels in the area served by the regional wastewater conveyance system and treatment plant in Renton. Future System Reliability - City of Renton If proper attention is paid to the on -going inspection, maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of City mains, the reliability of Renton's sewer system is expected to remain at an adequate level. A significant portion of the City's wastewater collection and conveyance system is over fifty years old. The materials used for sewers at the time these were installed are expected to have a useful life of approximately fifty years. Some of these mains are in an elevated need of repair and are ranked high in priority in Renton's 20-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The old mains are continually being inspected to determine which ones will need to be replaced during the second half of the 20-year CIP. Not all the fifty -plus year old mains are in the 20- year CIP. Continual evaluation of these facilities may indicate the need to re -prioritize CIP projects and dictate the advancement of some programs to ensure the integrity of the system. The 2005 update of the Wastewater Long -Range Management Plan will further evaluate the priority of replacements. Proposed sewer projects are ranked according to a prioritization process based on defined needs. The ranking system, at this time, includes categories that give points for improving substandard or deteriorating facilities, increasing the efficiency ofthe system, and protecting the environment. Objective U-E: Provide and maintain a sanitary sewer collection system that is consistent with the public health and water quality objectives of the State of Washington and the City of Renton. Policy U-55. Ensure and encourage the use of the sanitary sewer system within urban areas in a manner consistent with land use and environmental protection goals and policies. Policy U-56. All new developments should be required to connect to the sanitary sewer system, except low -density single-family residential development located away from environmentally sensitive areas, outside of Aquifer Protection Areas, and having adequate soils to support on -site septic systems. Policy U-57. Sewer connections should be provided in presently unsewered areas if the areas, by remaining unsewered, pose a health hazard to the aquifer, or if other groundwater contamination occurs. Policy U-58. Adequate sewer service capacity should be assured prior to the approval of any new development application (e.g. short plat, long plat, multifamily, commercial, and industrial development). Policy U-59. Sewer service should be expanded so that the current levels of service are maintained through build -out of the adopted land use classifications. Policy U-60. Excess sewer capacity alone should not be sufficient grounds for challenging the existing zoning for an area. Policy U-61. Coordinate with the regional wastewater agency and adjacent jurisdictions in the planning and maintenance of regional wastewater systems in and near the City. Policy U-62. Development should be conditioned on the orderly and timely provision of sanitary sewers. Policy U-63. Coordinate with the regional wastewater agency and adjacent jurisdictions to ensure that wastewater lines passing through Renton are operated in a safe manner at all times. Policy U-64. The City of Renton will follow state guidelines that define a City's ability to assume facilities in annexation areas. Policy U-65. Areas annexed without existing municipal sanitary sewer service will be served by Renton unless a service agreement exists or is negotiated with a neighboring utility. Policy U-66. Areas annexed with existing sanitary sewer service must meet the City's sanitary sewer service objectives. Upgrading to City standards of sanitary sewer facilities within all or portions of newly annexed areas will be required if there is a threat to public health and safety. If improvements are necessary, they may be accomplished by developer installation or LID as a condition of the annexation. Policy U-67. All property owners in unincorporated King County and Renton's PAA, who are granted City sanitary sewer services, should be required to sign a covenant to annex. Policy U-68. In areas where annexation is logical, extensions of service may be contingent upon request for annexation. (See Annexation policies in the Land Use Element) Policy U-69. Allow the extension of sanitary sewer services within the City's Potential Annexation Area according to such criteria as the City may require. Sanitary sewer services will not be established within another sewer service district, which provides sanitary sewer service except by agreement with that sewer service district. Policy U-70. The City may assume existing portions of adjacent sanitary sewer systems, at the discretion of the City Council, when such assumptions promote the logical and efficient development of the City's sanitary sewer system area. Policy U-71. The City Council will consider annexations without assumptions of existing sanitary Page 15 of 41 Page 16 of 41 sewer facilities under conditions defined in the Long Range Wastewater Management Plan. Policy U-72. Actively promote all residents within the City to connect to public sewer. Surface Water Policy U-73. Private sewage disposal systems will be allowed within the City limits, subject to city, county, and state regulations and when public sewers are not available. Discussion: Natural hydrologic systems play an integral role in effective surface water management. Engineering techniques can control much of the storm water through detention and retention systems. However, the cumulative effects of storm water can only be managed by a combination of engineering and preservation ofnatural systems. Surface water can dissolve and transport toxins from the human environment as well as carrying eroded materials. Renton's municipal water supply, as well as downstream water bodies, must be protected from water -borne contaminates through prudent management practices. Existing Conditions Renton's Surface Water Utility was organized to meet specific ordinances, regulations and to ensure that planned facilities meet defined engineering standards. The Utility is operated as a self-supporting utility under the direction of the Mayor and City Council. Utility Service Area The Utility's service area currently includes all lands within the City boundaries, more than 17.2 square miles. However, surface flows from the urban area within the Potential Annexation Area (PAA) and the rural area also affect the natural and constructed surface water management systems. This potential annexation area is currently serviced by King County. As areas within the PAA are annexed into the City, Renton will assume responsibility to provide surface water management services within the annexed areas. General Location of Facilities The existing surface and storm water facilities follow natural drainage patterns wherein surface water is collected and detained to reduce peak runoff rates, to provide water quality improvement, and for infiltration. Alternatively, it is conveyed through pipes to numerous surface water bodies. These surface water bodies include several creeks and rivers, and Lake Washington. The major topographic elements of the service area include several major drainage areas or basins within the city limits (seeFigure 4-1). The northern -most basin is the May Creek Basin, which begins northeast of the city limits and flows to Lake Washington. The Cedar River Basin runs through the heart of downtown Renton. This basin extends far beyond the city boundaries. Thus, hydrologic events and urban growth beyond the city limits may have a significant impact upon the surface drainage system, particularly near downtown and the outliall into Lake Washington. The facilities within the city limits for these basins include storm sewers, detention facilities, open channels, and other protective works. The Black River Basin, also know as the Eastside Green River Watershed (ESGRW), is a major basin in the southwestern portion of the City. The basin encompasses approximately 24 square miles that includes areas of Kent, Tukwila, and King County. Thus, coordination with other agencies in this area is essential. The City of Renton makes up less than one third of the total basin area. The facilities within the city limits for this basin include the Black River Pump Station, Springbrook Creek (P-1 channel), storm sewers, detention facilities, open channels, and other protective works. The remaining basins within the city limits include the West Hill Basin, which drains to Lake Washington, the Lower Empire Sub -basin in the Duwam ish Basin, which drains to the Green/Duwamish River and the Sons Creek Basin. The Soos Creek Basin is primarily outside of the city limits. Basin plans for the Black River Basin, the Maplewood Sub -basin, the Cedar River Basin (with King County), and the May Creek Basin (with King County) have been completed and actions identified in these plans are being implemented Existing Capacity of Facilities The existing surface water drainage system is meeting capacity requirements under normal conditions. However, in some areas of the City, the system has become inadequate to serve present needs during large, infrequent storm events. Of particular concern are inadequate facilities located within several basins. These basins are each affected by upstream development activities that have occurred in their respective watersheds, creating downstream capacity deficiencies. Currently there are no special efforts for floodway protection outside of the development review process and emergency responses during flooding. The City is studying frequently flooded areas including the Cedar River, North Renton, and the Black River Basin. Problems in the Black River Basin include widespread flooding or surface water ponding in the valley during severe rainfall events and the loss of outlet culvert capacity from the Panther Creek Wetlands. Existing and future surface water quality issues, loss of wetland habitat and fishery passage problems are additional concerns, with the continued development of the upstream portion of the watershed within Renton's Urban Growth Area and areas within the Cities of Kent and Tukwila. Page 17 of 41 Page 18 of 41 It3° OZ a8ed Vp molmW�. 1 ------------- irk . �♦ I - CO ' I Go cn ItJO 61 aged stung auumia ja;sM a3vpng I-t ain2Ij Other areas within the City with surface water problems include much of the Downtown and Rolling Hills vicinities. Storm drain facilities in areas along SW 7th Street, near the Renton Center, and Renton Village are over capacity during severe storm events causing flooding of facilities that are undersized for current flows from their tributary uplands. North of Downtown, both the Gypsy Creek and the North Renton Basins experience flooding caused, in part, by inadequately sized pipes, ditches and detention facilities. Flooding in the Gypsy Creek Basin is associated with facilities located near an interchange of Id05. Flooding in the lower portion of North Renton is largely caused by the system not being able to convey drainage from the Highlands neighborhood. Existing Reliability To a large extent, the reliability of the storm drainage system depends on three factors. In areas where growth has occurred, or will occur, the facilities must be designed to control the flows that are discharged from new development to pre -developed conditions (detention), and conveyance systems that are sized to convey the increased storm water runoff due to future land use conditions. Additionally the facilities require regular maintenance to prevent debris and blockage, that impair the system's ability to function properly, and routine observation to ensure they operate as designed during high flows. Thus, reliability is a function of proper sizing of storm water conveyance systems and flow control systems, along with the need for routine maintenance and replacement of these storm water management systems. City facilities in the lower reaches of several watersheds no longer meet the capacity requirements and, in some instances, may not have been maintained on a regular basis. Thus, they may not be considered reliable. As part of the Surface Water Utility System Plan, a Capital Improvement Program (CEP) has been developed to solve drainage problems and improve reliability. The Surface Water Utility System Plan also identifies maintenance and operation programs that are funded by the Utility to maintain public storm systems and address surface water management problems in the City. The Surface Water Utility has identified needed improvements through the basin plans. The current Surface Water Utility Six -year CIP is provided in the City Capital Improvement Program document. Surface Water Quality and Quantity Best Management Practices to be Implemented to Mitigate Future Land Use Impads The City adopts surface water management design standards that require the implementation of storm water quantity and quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) and controls as part of the approval of a project to mitigate the project's storm and surface water impacts during and after construction. These standards include erosion and sedimentation BMPs during construction, flow control, water quality treatment, and conveyance system sizing standards to manage the quantity and quality of storm water runoff from projects. The City has adopted the I990 King County Surface Water Design Manual as the design standard that projects must comply with to mitigate impacts to surface water However, as a condition of Environmental Review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), projects are conditioned to comply with the standards in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual in certain parts of the City. The Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (August 2001) also provides design standards and BMPs to mitigate impacts to surface water from new and redevelopment projects. The City of Renton is a Phase 2 community under the Clean Water Act National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program for Municipal Separate Storrs Sewer Systems. The NPDES program is intended to protect water quality from non -point source pollution from stormwater nrnoff. City will be required to obtain a NPDES Phase 2 stormwater permit from Ecology for its Municipal Separate Stone Sewer Systems in 2005, once Ecology completes development of the permit. The NPDES Phase 2 stormwater program requires the implementation of the following six minimum control measures: l . Public Education and Outreach on Stormwater impacts 2. Public Involvement/Participation 3. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination 4. Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control 5. Post -Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment 6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations The Surface Water Utility currently implements these six minimum control measures to some degree. It is expected that the NPDES Phase 2 stormwater permit will require some expansion of these programs and the adoption of new design standards for construction projects that are equivalent to the standards in the Ecology 2001 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The City has adopted wetland, stream buffer, steep slope, and flood hazard critical area ordinances, shoreline regulations and other development regulations that also protect surface water systems. The listing of Chinook salmon as threatened under the Endangered Species Act will require additional stormwater controls and strengthening of Critical Area Ordinances, updates to development regulations, and land use changes that will further reduce future land use impacts on streams, rivers, lakes, and wetlands in the City. The City currently operates a stone system maintenance program that includes cleaning catch basins, pipes and other facilities, along with a street vacuum sweeping program. The maintenance programs remove sediment and pollutants from City -owned and operated storm systems and streets, which reduces flooding and non -point source pollution from being discharged into water bodies in the City. Forecasted Conditions Future Utility Service Area The Utility's Service Area could enlarge substantially to approximately 35 square miles if the City of Renton annexes all areas within the Urban Growth Area. The areas that may be annexed are currently served by King County facilities. The City, upon annexation, would assume these facilities, their upkeep, and maintenance. General Location of Future Facilities The Renton surface and storm water system currently operates much like the gravity -based sewer system, although the destination is surface water bodies, rather than wastewater treatment plants. Stone and surface water facilities will generally remain in their current locations, although the individual sections may be replaced to convey higher flows. For new development, surface water facilities are usually constructed on a site -by -site basis, rather than on a comprehensive or system -wide basis. Storm water pipes and detention facilities will be constructed on -site during each construction project, and the off -site release rates should be limited to rates no greater than pre -development levels, per the King County Surface Water Design Manual. Most existing and new storm conveyance systems are constructed in public or private streets. Although peak flows are required to be regulated to pre -development levels, total volumes of flow will increase due to the increase in impervious area. New development may create negative downstream impacts although the development had complied with storm water controls and requirements due to the increase in runoff volume. The total volume of runoff will increase in all areas of new development, which may increase erosion and sedimentation and decrease surface water quality. Page 21 of 4l Page 22 of 41 The unincorporated urban area has existing storm water conveyance systems that are planned and administered by King County. The County land use plans for these areas are similar to the Renton plan. Since the King County facilities are designed with the same standards as City facilities, they function the same as City facilities. Future Capacity of Facilities Many of the existing facilities within the city limits will require modifications to increase capacity to provide adequate conveyance capacity and flow control (detention). All facilities would be sized to provide flow control and water quality treatment in accordance with the adopted city surface water design standards. Stormwater conveyance systems are required to convey storm flows from the twenty-five year or greater design storm event. New development is required to detain flows on -site in accordance with the adopted surface water design standards and to discharge the post construction runoff at rates no greater than pre -developed runoff rates. Basin plans will be prepared to determine need for and sizes of new regional drainage facilities. Several basin plans have been prepared and the City is also participating in regional salmon conservation planning within Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIA) 8 and 9. As the City annexes new areas within unincorporated King County additional basin/sub-basin planning will be needed. in addition, the Surface Water Utility System Plan will be updated and will comprehensively define resources, standards, and programs needed to effectively manage storm and surface water runoff in the City and potential annexation areas. The anticipated increase in impervious surface in all areas will increase surface runoff and require new facilities at development sites. In addition, new development, particularly infill development, may increase surface flows beyond existing facility capacity, requiring the enlargement of facilities downstream of the development. City standards require that new development mitigate for impacts to surface water by releasing runoff from the site at a rate no greater than the pre -developed runoff rate. Also, if downstream problems exist, new development is required to perform offsite analysis to ensure that the downstream problem is not made worse by the development. Surface Water Quality Requirements in Aquifer Protection Area Zone], Zone 1 Modified, and 2 Development projects located in either Zone 1, Zone I Modified, or Zone 2 of the Aquifer Protection Area (APA) are required to pass additional City review to ensure the projects do not produce water quantity and/or quality impacts that may affect the aquifer, which is used for the City's potable water supply. Areas of particular concern include areas subject to vehicular traffic or the storage of obemicals. The adopted land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan proposes areas for development of more intensive land uses by the year 2022. This includes substantial development and redevelopment of the Downtown. Portions of this area are within Zone 1 of Renton's APA. Zone 1 requirements include closed detention facilities including wet vaults on site, and pipe conveyance systems that meet pipeline specifications to prevent infiltration of storm water from these systems. APA Zone 2 and Zone 1 Modified requirements affect much of the northern and eastern portions of Renton. These requirements are not as stringent as Zone 1 requirements and generally require lining of conveyance system and water quality facilities to protect groundwater in areas with relatively porous soil. The APA regulations may increase the potential surface and storm flows generated from both zones, especially in Zone 1, since infiltration systems are not allowed. The increase in runoff may require existing facilities to be enlarged to meet the increased capacity need Objective U-F: Provide and maintain surface water management systems to minimize impacts on natural systems and to protect the public, property, surface water bodies, fish habitat, and groundwater from changes in the quantity and quality of storm water runoff due to land use changes. Policy U-74. Design storm drainage systems to minimize potential erosion and sedimentation problems, and to preserve natural drainage systems including rivers, streams, flood plains, lakes, ponds, and wetlands. Policy U-75. Encourage the retention of natural vegetation along lakes, ponds, rivers, and streams, where appropriate, in order to help preserve water quality, protect fishery resources, and control erosion and runoff. Policy U-76. Filling, culverting, and piping of natural watercourses that are classified as streams shall not be allowed, except as needed for a public works project. in the case where a public works project requires the filling, culverting, or piping of a natural watercourse, if no other option is available, then such projects should follow specific design standards to minimize impacts to the natural watercourse. Such standards should prevent flooding and the degradation of water quality, aquatic habitat, and the effectiveness of the local natural drainage system. This would include providing mitigation to replace the lost functions provided by the natural watercourse that is filled, culverted, or piped by the public works project. Policy U-77. Promote and support public education and involvement programs that address surface water quality and other surface water management issues. Policy U-78. Encourage the safe and appropriate use of detention and retention ponds, biofihration swales, clean roof run-off, and groundwater recharge technologies to reduce the volume of surface water run-off, to recharge aquifers, and to support base flows in streams for aquatic resources. Solid Waste Policy U-79. Work towards protecting surface water resources and groundwater resources from pollutants entering via the storm drainage system. Policy U-80. Implement stormwater standards that adequately control flow (quantity) and quality of stormwater runoff from new and redevelopment projects to protect public health and safety, prevent property damage, prevent erosion, and protect surface water quality, groundwater quality, and fish habitat. Policy U-81. Coordinate with adjacent cities, counties, and state and federal agencies in the development and implementation of the Clean Water Act's National Pollution Eliminating System Phase 2 Permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems. Policy U-82. Existing natural drainage, watercourses, ravines, and other similar land features should be protected from the adverse effects of erosion from increased storm water runoff. Policy U-83. Storm and surface water management programs should be coordinated with adjacent local and regional jurisdictions. Discussion: These policies support the provision ofadequate and safe waste handling and disposal facilities. In addition, these policies support active recycling efforts aimed at extending the life cycle of these facilities Page 23 of 41 Page 24 of 41 Existing Conditions Utility Service Area Solid waste collection within the city limits is mandated by state and city code and only the City's contractor may provide such service. The City sets rates for solid waste collection, and bills all customers directly for these services. The City contracts with Waste Management -Rainier for all solid waste collection within the city limits. State law also gives Renton the authority to contract for collection of residential recyclables and yard waste. Curbside collection of recyclables is available to all single-family and duplex residents of the City, and onsite collection is available to all multi -family and duplex residents fourplex and above). Yard waste collection is available to all single-family and duplex residents with the exception of mobile home park residents. Yard waste collection may be available to multi -family and mobile home residents for an additional fee. Waste Management, Inc. provides collection containers for all of these programs. The recycling and yard waste collection programs are voluntary. The City contracts with Waste Management, inc. for these services. Coordination with Other Solid Waste Purveyors Through an interlocal agreement with King County, the County's disposal system handles all solid waste generated within city limits, except solid waste diverted by waste reduction or recycling activities. King County regulates the types of waste accepted at its facilities as well as the disposal rates. Renton's mterlocal agreement with King County also authorizes the County to prepare the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan and to include the City in the Plan. The County achieved its 1995 goal of fifty percent (50%) waste reduction and recycling under the Plan. Renton works cooperatively with other jurisdictions in the region to implement the Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan (LHWMP). Participants in the LHWMP include thirty-eight (38) suburban cities, the City of Seattle, King County Solid Waste Division, King County Water and Land Division, and the Department of Public Health, Seattle -King County. The LHWMP provides a regional program to manage hazardous waste generated in small quantities by households and businesses in King County. To provide funding for the LHWMP, the City of Renton and all other solid waste and sewer service providers in King County, tolled hazardous waste fees from customers through utility bills. Regional Solid Waste Purveyors within the City Limits The King County Solid Waste Division owns and operates the Renton Transfer Station in the 3000 block of NE 4th Street in the Renton Highlands neighborhood. Local waste haulers and residents of unincorporated King County who haul their own waste use this facility. City residents also use this facility for disposal of large and bulky items. Due to state legislation and Washington Utilities and Trade Commission (WUTC) regulations, the City does not have the authority to contract exclusively for collection of recyclable materials generated by businesses. However, a number of private companies do collect recyclables from businesses in Renton. Location and Capacity of xisting Solid Waste Facilities There are three existing solid waste facilities within the City's Planning Area: a King County Transfer Station, the Cedar Hills Landfill, and the Black River Construction, Demolition, and Land Clearing Transfer Station (CDL). King County's Renton Transfer Station is located in the Renton Highlands. A majority of the solid waste generated in Renton is transported there by the City's contractor, Waste Management, inc. A majority of the vehicles that utilize the Transfer Station are garbage trucks from waste hauling companies. Regional Disposal's Black River Transfer and Recycling Center (a Rabanco facility), located at 501 Monster Road SW, opened in late 1993. Under a contract with King County, this facility accepts construction, demolition, and land clearing waste. The facility received 89,300 tons of CDL material in 1999. There is no data on the amount of CDL processed at construction sites and hauled directly to a processor. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the amount of CDL waste being diverted from the facility. The Cit-, of Renton recognizes that the Mt. Olivet Landfill (closed 1991) NNas not closed in accordance with State of Washington closure standards. Areas of deficiency include excessively steep slopes, lack of adequate capping, possible negative environmental consequences, failure to obtain an approved closure plan, and other related deficiencies. The City continues to monitor groundwater quality in the vicinity of the landfill to assure that potential contaminants do not enter the City's drinking water aquifer. If contamination is detected, the City has contingency measures to address this problem, such as selective operation of the City's eight wells and groundwater pumping to remove contaminants. Identified areas of contamination would be monitored until the contaminants are removed. King County's Cedar Hills Landfill, owned and operated by the King County Solid Waste Division, and located southeast of Renton, will continue to receive all solid waste generated in the City of Renton. This facility's remaining permitted capacity is approximately 12.5 million tons (as of January 2000). At the current level of fifty percent (50°/u) waste reduction and recycling, Cedar Hills will be able to accept solid waste until 2012. Recyclables collected from single family, duplex, and multi -family residents in the City are taken to Waste Management, Inc.'s Cascade Recycling Center in Woodinville, WA. Yard waste for single-family and duplex residents in the City is currently taken to Cedar Grove Recycling in Maple Valley. Their yearly capacity is 195,000 tons of organic material. Currently, the facility handles approximately 172,000 tons anmtally. Cedar Grove is permitted by the Seattle -King County Health Department to have 250,000 cubic yards of organic material onsite. The City's residential yard waste collection program has diverted increasing amounts of the residential waste stream every year, successfully diverting over 30% in 2001, and more than seven percent (7%) of the City's total Page 25 of 41 Page 26 of 41 waste stream annually since it began in 1989. Yard waste makes up only 0.9 percent of the remaining residential waste stream; therefore any increase in diversion would be minimal. Food waste makes up almost thirty-five percent (35%) of the residential waste stream after recyclables and yard wastes are diverted. The Solid Waste Utility implemented a pilot food waste composting program in 1994 and 1995 to assess the feasibility of diverting this material from Renton's residential waste stream. Worm compost bins were delivered to approximately 200 residents and weekly measurements were made on their waste practices. This led to a period of several years in which residents could obtain a worm bin from the city for the purpose of residential food waste composting. Reliability of Existing Solid Waste Services and Facilities The services of the City's solid waste and recycling collection contractor, Waste Management, inc., have been very reliable since the inception of the program in 1989. The number of missed collections has remained consistently low. Contingency plans for collection are provided in the solid waste contract in the event of extreme weather conditions. Interruption of service due to a contract dispute is not likely because the City has completed negotiations of a new contract with Waste Management, Inc. The new contract terminates at the end of 2005, but has the potential to be extended with two 2-year extension options. At this time, the capacities of the Renton Transfer Station and the Cedar Hills Landfill are sufficient, and any regulatory issues are being addressed by the appropriate agency. The capacity of the Cascade Recycling Center for processing recyclables and the capacity of Cedar Grove Recycling for composting yard wastes are both adequate to meet the City's needs. Forecasted Conditions Future Utility Service Areas The City's Solid Waste Utility will continue to provide solid waste collection to all residents and businesses within the city limits. Curbside collection of recyclables and yard waste will continue to be available to all single- family and duplex residents in Renton. Multi -family residences continue to be eligible for on -site collection of recyclables. Yard waste collection will continue to be offered to mobile home parks and multi -family complexes for an additional fee. When annexations take place, the franchise hauler in the annexed area has authority to collect solid waste for a period of up to seven (7) years. After seven years, the City's contractor may take over service in the annexed area. The City's contractor should be able to increase solid waste, recycling, and yard waste collection service to households and businesses as needed. Since King County has planned for both incorporated and unincorporated areas in the County, disposal facilities are anticipated to be adequate should the City annex areas of unincorporated King County. Location and Capacity of Future Facilities Currently, King County plans to keep the Renton Transfer Station operational and to install a compactor by 2012, at a cost of S4,000,000. This date coincides with the projected closure of the Cedar Hills Landfill, and will enable the facility to prepare waste for transport to a new location. Transportation of noncompacted waste costs approximately 1.5 times more than the cost of hauling compacted waste. Therefore, the installation of the compactor should nummize any necessary rate increases caused by the greater distance between the transfer station and a new facility. King County's Final 2000 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan suggests that a study be made of the possibility of privatization of the transfer system. The City of Renton is concerned that this may limit market competition in the private sector. The City is also concerned that ending public ownership of transfer facilities will limit the City's influence over rates and service levels. King County's Cedar Hills Landfill is the last regional landfill located in the County. While the diversion rate by City residents has risen sharply in the past ten years (diverting 58.6 percent as of July 2001), the overall quantity of waste has also risen, and Cedar Hills is scheduled for closure in 2012. Under the 2000 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, the King County Solid Waste Division is exploring waste export possibilities. After the Cedar Hills closure, it is likely that solid waste will be exported outside the County. Waste Management, Inc.'s Cascade Recycling Center will continue to receive Renton residents' recyclables as long as the City contracts with Waste Management, inc. for collection. To increase their overall processing capacity, Waste Management Inc. has diverted paper generated in North King County and South Snohomish County from the Seattle plant to its Woodinville transfer station for processing. This change has allowed the Seattle plant to handle more recyclable material generated in South King County. The amount of yard waste collected through the City's program is not expected to increase significantly. Therefore, capacity at the Cedar Grove composting facility in the County should be sufficient to meet future needs. Coordination with Other Purveyors The interlocal agreement between the City of Renton and King County, which designates the County s disposal system for the disposal of all solid waste generated within city limits, remains in effect through June 30, 2028. Either party may request review and/or renegotiation of the agreement every five years. It is anticipated that the City will coordinate with the County to negotiate a new interlocal agreement upon the expiration of the existing agreement. Interloeal Agreements Chapter 70.95 RCW requires the County to regularly update the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (the Plan). According to the provisions of the City s interlocal agreement with King County, this update will occur every three years The City will be included in future Plan updates, and representatives of the City will continue to be involved in the Plan update process. The Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan (LHWMP), in which the City of Renton participates, follows a five-year update schedule as required by Chapter 70.105 RCW. The first update occurred in 1995. The City will continue to work cooperatively with other jurisdictions and agencies involved in the LHWMP to implement programs to manage hazardous wastes generated in small quantities from households and businesses in King County, including the collection of hazardous waste fees from City solid waste customers. Reliability Annexations to the City and the closure of the Cedar Hills Landfill are not expected to have a significant impact on the ability of the City's contractor to provide reliable solid waste, recycling and yard waste collection services. If changes within Waste Management, Inc. affect the ability of their company to provide services to City customers, the City has the ability to renegotiate the contract, or enter into a contract with another service provider. Page 27 of 41 Page 28 of 41 Depending on regional regulations, the yard waste composting facility at Cedar Grove, may have problems handling significant increases in the amount of organic waste collected in the future. However, the City does not anticipate this to happen. Objective: U-G: To provide a responsible, comprehensive waste management program that includes economic efficiency, environmental sensitivity, and responsiveness to the needs of the community The City should pursue a reduction of the overall waste stream, recycling, and long-term waste handling and disposal solutions. Policy U-84. Provide and maintain an adequate system of solid waste, recycling collection, disposal and handling to meet existing and future needs. Policy U-85. Coordinate with regional agencies in planning for the facilities and services necessary for solid waste collection and disposal, including the siting of regional transfer and waste handling facilities. Policy U-86. Reduction of the waste stream should be supported and promoted for all residential, commercial, and industrial uses within the city (i.e. through programs and public education including recycling, composting, re -use, and energy recovery Programs that meet environmental standards). Policy U-87. Where economically feasible and legally acceptable, citywide collection of recyclable materials should be supported and promoted. Policy U-88. The proper handling and disposal of solid waste should be required to protect public health and safety. Electrical System Existing Conditions Background Policy U-89. Contamination of land, air, and water should be minimized or eliminated. Policy U-90. Coordinate with agencies in the region on educational and other programs for the safe management and disposal of hazardous household wastes. Policy U-91. Support products and practices that offer safe and effective alternatives to the use of Potentially hazardous substances in order to reduce the total amount of hazardous waste. Policy U-92. Actively support the creation of markets for products made with recycled materials Policy U-93. Actively support regionally coordinated efforts that promote producer responsibility and environmental stewardship. Three purveyors distribute electricity to and within the Renton Planning Area: Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Seattle City Light (SCL), and Puget Sound Energy (PSE). BPA is the regional administrative entity of the U.S. Department of Energy. Seattle City Light is a publicly owned utility serving Seattle and environs. Puget Sound Energy is a private, investor -owned utility that provides electrical service to approximately 1 million customers in the Puget Sound region. These three utilities are part of an integrated transmission grid that connects points of production and demand and Permits inter -utility exchange of power across the region. To make this possible, the various elements of the individual systems were designed to function compatibly with the facilities of otter network utilities. High capacity transmission lines also allow inter -regional and international power transfers to compensate for seasonal, region -wide vanations in generation and demand. BPA owns and operates most of the major transmission lines and substations located throughout the Pacific Northwest. The agency sells transmission services on the high capacity grid to customers throughout the region. Additionally, BPA markets electricity generated by federal hydroelectric projects and the Washington Public Power Supply System. Puget Sound energy, Seattle City Light, and other utilities purchase power and transmission services from BPA as local situations warrant. Electricity is retailed to customers in the Renton Planning Area by Puget Sound Energy and, to a lesser extent, by Seattle City Light. For both utilities, the primary generation facilities are located outside their service areas. Puget Sound Energy supplements these sources with power generated and/or purchased within its greater service area. Each utility schedules electrical generation to meet anticipated local demand loads with excess production sold elsewhere on the power grid. Existing Utility Service Area Puget Sound Energy is the principal provider of electrical service within the Renton city limits, as well as most of the remainder of the Renton Planning Area. Electricity is provided to the Bryn Mawr and Skyway portions of the Renton Planning Area by SCL. General Location of Facilities Electrical facilities can generally be divided into generation, transmission, and distribution functions. Transmission limes are identified by voltages of 115 kilovolt (kV) and above, distribution facilities have less than 55,000 volts (55 kV), and a distribution substation transforms voltages of 115 kV or greater to feeder circuits at lower voltages of 12 or 34 kV. Within the Planning Area, BPA operates transmission facilities, Seattle City Light operates transmission and distribution facilities, and Puget Sound Energy engages in all three functions. Renton's geographic position offers a logical location for transmission routes. Five BPA transmission circuits follow the Rocky Reach -Maple Valley right-of-way, which enters the Planning Area from the east, just south of the Cedar River, and terminates at BPA's Maple Valley Substation. The lines, two 500 kV, one 345 kV, and two 230 kV, originate at BPA facilities north, south, and east of Renton. As electrical service provider to most of the Planning Area, Puget Sound Energy builds, maintains and/or operates various facilities. These include high voltage transmission lines for bulk power transfers, substations for system monitoring and control and changing of voltage levels, and lower voltage feeder lines to carry the electricity to the consumers. The high capacity lines energized at 230 kV and 115 kV feed out from the Talbot Hill Station, which receives power from the adjacent BPA Maple Valley Station. From Talbot Hill these lines carry power to other transmission stations or to distribution substations where the voltage is stepped down for entry into the feeder system. Page 29 of 41 Page 30 of 41 The portion of Renton's Planning Area currently served by Seattle City Light is small, containing only two minor distribution substations, Bryn Mawr and Skyway. Power is provided to these substations by Seattle's Creston distribution substation. In addition, several Seattle City Light rights -of -way pass through the City and the Urban Growth Area. These circuits include: The Bothell -Renton Right -of -Way (ROW), with one oftwo SCL 230 kV lines currently in use and leased to Puget Sound Energy. The Renton -Creston ROW, with six 230 kV lines. The Cedar Falls ROW, with one 115 kV line. Capacity/Reliability of Evicting System Puget Sound Energy and Seattle City Light are both capable of meeting the current electrical load in their respective service areas. Puget Sound Energy operates eleven distribution substations in the Renton Planning Area with a total nameplate capacity of 284,400 kilowatts (kW). The residential/commercial peak load utilization factor for these substations is 87.5%. SCL's Creston substation is outside the Planning Area, but supplies power within it. Creston's capacity is 106,000 kW and has a utilization factor of 81 %. The utilization factor, or the load to capacity ratio, is normally maintained in the 75% to 85% range. Leaving excess capacity under normal conditions allows a reserve for periods of extraordinary load during extreme cold weather, and for system diversity. The capacity of individual elements is not the sole consideration in evaluating an electrical system, however. Our dependence on electrical power is such that the overall grid and the constituent utilities must continue to famish power even with the failure of individual components. Electric service interruptions are most frequently a product of extraordinary circumstances. Either an unusual load has overtaxed an element of the system or it has been weakened or removed by some external condition or event. Any such occurrence could cut off an area from the grid and/or endanger other parts of the system by a sudden transfer of power from one conductor to another of insufficient capacity. To mitigate these threats to the system, redundant lines and facilities of adequate capacity are necessary. This diversity is programmed to meet reliability criteria, which assume a failure of one or two components of a system (single or double contingency) with no loss of customers or damage to equipment. Forecasted Conditions- Electrical Forecasted increases in population would result in 135, 161 persons and 91, 874 jobs, within the Planning Area, by 2010. Based on these forecasts the Renton Planning Area will have an additional load of 147.3 MVA, excluding industrial load increases, at the extreme winter peak in 2010. Industrial load additions will comprise some part of the 82.3 MVA increase that Puget Sound Energy anticipates for Renton industrial consumers by 2020. Future Capacity of Electrical Facilities To assure system reliability and to provide the capacity necessary to accommodate the growth anticipated for the Renton Planning Area, SCL, BPA, and PSE have planned for upgrades and additions to their respective systems. Puget Sound Energy has prepared a King County Draft GMA Electrical Facilities Plan. According to this plan, the utility has several system improvements in progress within the Renton Planning Area that are necessary to serve forecasted load growth for the next thirty years. Puget Sound Energy's plans for future transmission lines, facilities, and upgrades will increase system capacity and reliability. Also proposed is the Aqua substation. This substation may or may not be located within the City's Urban Growth Boundary, but in either case would likely serve residents both within and outside of the urban growth boundary. Existing SCL 4 kV lines are being replaced with a new 26 kV network. The Bryn Mawr and Skyway substations will no longer be needed and will be taken off-line when this upgrade is complete. Additionally, SCL has indicated the possibility of adding two 230 kV transmission lines from BPA's Covington Substation to South Seattle on existing transmission line corridors to serve load growth within the next twenty years. The BPA has plans to increase reliability by installing additional 500 kV circuits and 500 kV to 230 kV transformers. While these will benefit Renton, they are not within the Planning Area_ The only project that BPA currently has planned for inside the Planning Area is a static VAR for the Maple Valley Station. This device senses increased load and signals the capacitors to release stored energy. Conservation & Demand Management Conservation is one means to reduce loads, existing or projected, on the electric system. This can delay the need for new or expanded generation and transmission facilities. System wide, Puget Sound Energy expects that conservation will yield an additional 296 average MW and 592 MW on system peak in the year 2010. Conservation programs are enacted on a utility -wide basis and regulated by the WUTC. While conservation reduces overall electrical consumption, demand -side management influences when the demand will occur. Educating consumers to modify their consumption patterns, imposing a sliding rate structure for time - of -day and for increment of energy used, or directly controlling energy use by certain customers, can all serve to spread the load throughout the day. Since electric utility systems are designed to accommodate peak loads, this method can delay the need for additional capacity. Objective U-H: Promote the availability of safe, adequate, and efficient electrical service within the City and the remainder of its Planning Area, consistent with the utihty's regulatory obligation to serve. Policy U-94. The provision of electricity to the City's Planning Area should be coordinated with local and regional purveyors to ensure the availability of electricity to meet projected growth in population and employment. Policy U-95. Encourage purveyors of electrical power to make facility improvements/additions within existing electric facility corridors where appropriate. Page 31 of 41 Page 32 of 41 Natural Gas And Fuel Pipelines Existing Conditions - Natural Gas Background Natural gas is a mixture of hydrocarbon and non -hydrocarbon gases extracted from porous rock formations below the earth's surface. The gas makes its way from the producing fields via the interstate pipeline at high-pressures, often over one thousand pounds per square inch (psi). Colorless and odorless as it comes off the interstate pipeline, a powerful odorant, typically mercaptan, is added for safety purposes to make leaks easier to detect. Through a series of reduction valves, the gas is delivered to homes at pressures of from 0.25 to 2 psi. In recent decades, the residential popularity of natural gas has risen. Cleaner burning and less expensive than the ahernatives, oil and electricity, it has become the fuel of choice in many households for cooking, drying clothes, and heating home and water. Natural Gas Utility Service Area Puget Sound Energy provides natural gas service to approximately 650,000 customers in the Puget Sound Region, including Renton and its Urban Growth Area. General Location ojNatural Gas Facilities Puget Sound Energy operates under a franchise agreement with the City of Renton, which allows PSE to locate facilities within the public street right-of-ways. The gas distribution system consists of a network of high-pressure mains and distribution lines that convey natural gas throughout the Planning Area. Natural gas is provided to PSE by the Northwest Pipeline Corporation, which operates a system extending from Canada to New Mexico. Two parallel Northwest Pipeline Corporation high-pressure mains enter the Planning Area south of Lake McDonald and terminate at the South Seattle Gate Station. PSE high-pressure mains then extend to smaller lines branching -off from the primary supply mains. Through a series of smaller lines and pressure regulators the gas is delivered to consumers. PSE also operates an underground propane storage facility. Capacity ojNatural Gas Facilities Although PSE serves most of Renton and its Urban Growth Area, a portion of the Planning Area, west of the Renton Municipal Airport, and straddling SR-900 is currently not served by Puget Sound Energy. Provision of natural gas service to this area would only require extension of intermediate service lines. The capacity of the system is primarily constrained by the volume of gas entering the PSE network from the Northwest Pipeline Corporation mains. Current capacity of the South Seattle Gate Station, the point of entry for natural gas to the area, is nine million standard cubic feet per hour (scfh). This can serve approximately 180,000 residential customers. The minimum pressure at which gas can be delivered is fifteen pounds per square inch (15 psi). Methods for increasing supply to a particular area include replacement of the lines, looping, installing parallel lines, and inserting higher -pressure lines into greater diameter, but lower pressure mains. A reserve of natural gas supply is maintained in order to respond to temporary shortfalls in the natural gas supply due to weather -driven higher demand or supply interruptions. A number of separate utilities share the facility, however, and hence it is not dedicated to the Renton Planning Area. Natural Gas System Reliability Since natural gas is chiefly used as a home heating fuel, demand rises as the outdoor temperature drops. The locally available gas supply and the capacity of PSE's delivery system may not always be sufficient to provide product to all customers during periods of exceptional demand. Therefore, PSE has several short term, load - balancing strategies. As stated previously, PSE operates a storage facility that provides a reserve of additional gas for times of shortfall. Also, some gas customers are served under an interruptible service contract. For those times when gas resources become limited, these connections can be temporarily dropped from the system. Residential customers are always granted first priority for available gas supply. Another strategy to maintain system pressure is the looping of mains. Feeding product from both ends of a pipeline decreases the possibility of localized pressure drops and increases system reliability. Forecasted Conditions Puget Sound Energy predicts a growth rate of 41.2% in demand for this 20-year planning horizon. According to this assumption, demand for gas will average 1,227,562.6 cubic feet per hour for December 2010 within the Renton Planning Area. PSE has stated that they will be able to accommodate this increased demand. This will be accomplished through an upgrade of the South Seattle Gate Station to allow the entry of an additional two million scfh into the system, for a total capacity of eleven million scfh. The backfeed from Covington will add another three million scfh and, with the current peak hour feed of one million scfh from Issaquah, there will be sufficient supply capacity to serve the customer base anticipated for 2010. Proposed New or Improved Facilities There is one high pressure main proposed to meet the increased gas demand, which should result from the forecast growth. The ultimate placement of the line will be based on right-of-way permitting, environmental standards, coordination with other utilities, and existing infrastructure placement. PSE has a policy to expand the supply system to serve additional customers. Gas connections arc initiated by customer requests. Maximum capacity of the existing distribution system can be increased by the following methods: increasing distribution and supply pressures in existing lines, installing parallel mains, replacing existing with larger sized mains, looping mains, and adding district regulators from supply mains to provide additional intermediate pressure gas sources. Page 33 of 41 Page 34 of 41 Petroleum Fuel Pipelines Existing Conditions Utility Service Area Olympic Pipeline Company is a joint -interest company that provides a variety of fuel oil products via a system of Pipelines throughout the region. The stock is held by Atlantic Richfield Corporation (Arco), Shell, and Texaco oil companies. Olympic transports oil products from the Ferndale British Petroleum (BP) refinery, the Cherry Point Arco refinery, and the Anacortes Shell and Texaco refineries through Renton to Seattle, Sea-Tac international Airport, and points south to Portland, Oregon. Olympic's Renton facilities function as a regional distribution hub, as well as supplying the local market with petroleum products. General Location of Fuel Product Pipelines and Other Facilities The Olympic Pipeline Company's facilities in the Renton Planning Area include a system of pipes, varying from 12 to 20 inches in diameter, and a central monitoring station atLind Avenue SW. Petroleum products enter Renton via two pipes from the City's northern border, and then extend south and west to the Renton Station. From here, a 12-inch main heads north, eventually intercepting the City of Seattle Skagit Transmission Line right- of-way toward Seattle. Two parallel branches also extend westward to the Green River, at which point one line heads west to Sea-Tac Airport and one turns south to serve Tacoma and beyond. Renton Station is the monitoring and control center for the entire pipeline network. Here, also, oil products are transferred to trucks for distribution. Capacity of Fuel Product Pipelines and Facilities The Olympic Pipeline Company currently carries an average of approximately 270,000 barrels of product per day, varying according to the transported material. The absolute capacity of the system is over 350,000 barrels. As the primary supplier of petroleum products to Western Washington, Olympic states that system capacity is sufficient to meet current demand.Forecasted Conditions Olympic, though not directly serving City of Renton, affirms that they can and will increase the capacity of the system to accommodate a demand commensurate with the expected population and land uses anticipated by 2020 in the Renton Planning Area. Aside from laying new pipelines, options for increasing capacity include introducing drag reducing agents to the petroleum products, increasing the horsepower of the pumps, and replacing individual sections of pipe where bottlenecks tend to occur. Objective U-I: Promote the safe transport and delivery of natural gas and other fuels within the Planning Area Policy U-96. Coordinate with local and regional Policy U-98. Allow for the extension of natural gas purveyors of natural gas for the siting of distribution lines to and within the city limits and transmission lines, distribution lines, and other Urban Growth Area, provided they are consistent facilities within the Renton Planning Area. with development envisioned in the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy U-97. Support cost effective public programs aimed at energy conservation, efficiency, and supplementing of natural gas supplies through new technology. Policy U-99. Require that petroleum product Pipelines are operated and maintained in such a manner that protects public safety, especially where Telecommunications those facilities are located in the Aquifer Protection Area. Telecommunications: Conventional Telephone, Fiber Optic Cable, Cellular Telephone, and Cable Television Existing Conditions - Conventional (Wirelindlandline) Telephone Utility Service Area - Conventional Telephone Service to Renton and its Planning Area is provided by Qwest Communications, Inc (formerly US West). Qwest is an investor -owned corporation, whose holdings include companies serving regional, national, and international markets, including telephone services to 25 million customers in 14 western states. The subsidiaries include directory publishing, cellular mobile communications and paging, personal communications networks, cable television, business communications systems sales and service, communications software, and financial services. All cities within the State of Washington fall within a particular Local Access and Transport Area (LATA). These LATAs are telephone exchange areas that define the area in which Qwest is pernutted to transport telecommunications traffic. There are 94 exchanges within Washington where Qwest provides dial tone and other local services to customers. General Location of Conventional Telephone Facilities Telephone service systems within Renton and its Planning Area include switching stations, tnmk lines, and distribution lines. Switching stations, also called "Central Offices" (COs), switch calls within and between line exchange groupings. These groupings are addressed uniquely by an area code and the first three digits of a telephone number. Each line grouping can carry up to 10,000 numbers. Renton has 14 of these groupings. Four main "feeder" cable routes generally extend from each CO, heading to the north, south, east, and west, Connected to these main feeder routes are branch feeder routes. The branch feeder routes connect with thousands of local loops that provide dial tore to every subscriber. These facilities may be aerial or buried, copper or fiber. Local loops can be used for voice or data transmission (such as facsimile machines or computer modems). A variety of technologies are utilized including electronics, digital transmission, fiber optics, and other means to provide multiple voice/data paths over a single wire. Methods of construction are determined by costs and local regulations. Page 35 of 41 Page 36 of 41 Capacity of Conventional Telephone Facilities Capacity of a CO is a fimction of the type of switch employed. Advances in technology and the use of digital transmission provide for increases in switch capacity to meet growth. Reliability of the Conventional Telephone System Telephone service is very reliable with the exception of extraordinary circumstances such as severe weather events or natural disasters. In many cases, the system may still be operational, but the volume of calls being placed to and from the affected area creates shortfalls in service. in Renton, the inauguration Day windstorm of January 1993 resulted in some system outages. Generally, following a catastrophic event, public telephone systems would be restored before service to individuals and businesses. Forecasted Conditions- Conventional Telephone Forecasted Capacity of Conventional Telephone Fatalities Ample capacity exists in the Renton CO to accommodate growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element. Recent technological advancements have resulted in consolidation of equipment at the Renton CO. Several additional floors are available in the building housing the CO for future expansion of the system. Line facilities within the Planning Area would require some upgrading, but no new buildings would be needed to meet projected growth. Regulations governing telecommunications require that the purveyor provide adequate telecommunication service on demand. Upgrading facilities and constructing new facilities accommodate growth. New technology is employed to enhance service, when available and practical. Enhancements necessary to maintain adequate capacity are determined through regular evaluation of the system. Qwest has confirmed that they will be able to extend timely service to all current and new subscribers anticipated in the population forecasts for the Renton Planning Area. Existing Conditions - Fiber Optic Telecommunication systems Utility Service Area -Fiber Optic Telecommunications The Staroom Service Corporation, a Washington corporation of the Canadian Starcom International Optics Corporation of Vancouver, B.C. plans to locate facilities within the City of Renton Planning Area. The system is a "carriers carrier" and is not intended to connect with individual users in the City of Renton. Services are to be leased to other telecommunications purveyors. The cable based telecommunications system will provide a telecommunication link between Vancouver B.C. and Seattle. General Location of Existing Fiber Optic Telecommunications Facilities As of this writing, no Starcom fiber optic facilities are in place in Renton. However, the company is currently engaged in the permitting required to bury cable within the 100 foot wide Burlington Northern Railroad right-of- way, about four feet below ground. The line generally follows the eastern shore of Lake Washington from the northern city limits to the Boeing facility, and then roughly parallels 1405 until it intersects with 1-5. Forecasted Conditions- Fiber Optic Telecommunications Systems Forecasted Capacity of Fiber Optic Telecommunications Facilities According to Starcom, the proposed fiber optic cable and latest technology regenerative equipment will provide capacity to meet growth envisioned in the City's Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Existing Conditions - Cellular Telephone Background - Cellular Telephone Cellular system technology works on the principle of reusing radio frequencies. The same radio frequency can be reused as long as service areas do not overlap. In this way, shorter antennas can be used and located on top of existing structures, rather than constructing freestanding towers. Siting of cellular facilities depends on how the system is configured. The cell sites must be designed so that channels can be reused, because the FCC allocates a limited number of channels to the cellular telephone industry. As cell sites were initially developed, a few large cells were established using hilltops or tall buildings to site transmission and receiving antennas. This allowed for maximum coverage of the large cell. Clusters of smaller cells have since replaced the larger configuration, diminishing the need for larger antennas. Thus, shorter antennas and poles provide coverage for the smaller cell sites. This division of cells will continue to occur as the demand for cellular service grows. Eventually, cell sites will be placed less than two miles apart with antennas situated on poles about 60-feet high, or the height of a four-story building. Cell sites are located within the center of an area defined by a grid system. Topography and other built features can affect signal transmission, so the cell is configured to locate the cell site at an appropriate place to provide the best transmission/reception conditions. Sub -cells are sometimes created because natural features such as lakes, highways or inaccessible locations prevent siting within the necessary one -mile radius from the ideal grid point. Preferred cell site locations include: existing broadcast or communications towers, water towers, high rise buildings, vacant open land appropriately zoned that could be leased or purchased, and areas with low population densities to diminish aesthetic impacts. When new antenna structures are required for the cell site, monopoles or lattice structures are often utilized. Monopoles generally range in height from 60 feet to 150 feet. The base of the monopole varies between 40 to 72 inches in diameter. Monopoles are generally more aesthetically acceptable, but changes in the system such as lowering of antennas are not possible without major changes. Lattice structures are either stabilized by guy wires or self -supported. Generally, the maximum height of a lattice structure is limited to between 200 and 250 feet. Guyed towers can be built to accommodate a greater height, but the guy wires can pose navigational problems to migrating birds and aircraft. in addition, the taller towers often are perceived to have more severe aesthetic impacts. All structures require that a six to eight foot separation occur between antennas for signal reception. This is termed "system diversity" and is needed on the reception antennas in order to receive an optimal signal from the mobile telephone. Page 37 of 41 Page 38 of 41 Utility Service Area - Cellular Telephone Cellular telephone service is licensed by the FCC for operation in Metropolitan Service Areas (MSA) and Rural Service Areas (RSA). The FCC grants two licenses within each service area. One of those licenses is reserved for the local exchange telephone company (also referred to as the wireline carrier). Qwest Cellular (NewVector) holds the wireline licenses in the Tacoma, Seattle, Bellingham, and Spokane MSA. The non -wire line licenses in these areas, and also in the Yakima MSA is held by McCaw Cellular Communications (Cellular One). Recently, Cellular One merged with AT&T. Existing Capacity of Cellular Telephone Facilities Forecasting for cellular facilities is accomplished using a two-year horizon. Information regarding current and future predicted number of subscribers is considered by the purveyors to be proprietary, and no data was furnished in this regard. However, statewide customer counts total approximately 250,000, with the number anticipated to increase to several million by the year 2010. It is predicted that by the period covering the years 2005 to 2010, approximately twenty percent (20%) of the population in Washington State will be served. Reliability of Cellular Telephone Facilities Cellular communications are considered to be more reliable than conventional telephone systems because they can continue to operate during electrical power outages. Each cell site is equipped with a back-up power supply, either a battery or generator, or combination of the two. Severe weather events or natural disaster conditions have validated the use of cellular telephones on numerous occasions throughout the country. When conventional telephone systems fail, or telephone lines are jammed, cellular calls have a better chance of being completed. Forecasted Conditions- Cellular Telephone Future Capacity of Cellular Telephone Facilities As previously stated, forecasting for new cellular facilities uses a relatively narrow time frame of two years. Expansion is demand driven. Raising the density of transmission/reception equipment to accommodate additional subscribers, cell splitting, follows rather than precedes increases in local system load. Therefore, cellular companies must maintain a short response time and a tight planning horizon. Existing Conditions - Cable Television Background - Cable Television Cable television or CATV (Community Antenna Television) originated with small-scale attempts to obtain a clear television signal in areas too remote or too obstructed to receive one via the airways. Dating from the 1940s, the early systems were constructed of surplus wiring and basic electronic hardware. Subsequent technological innovations in signal transmission have increased the number of available channels and permitted the emergence of new players in the television broadcast industry. The multiplicity of channels and the ability to direct the signal to specific addresses have opened up both niche and global markets to information and entertainment purveyors. In addition to the provisions of cable television services, advancements in technology have allowed the current purveyor to provide high speed access to Internet services with the provision of additional features expected as market demands dictate. Page 39 of 40 Utility Service Area - Cable Television The current purveyor holds a cable television franchise to serve the City of Renton. The service area includes the entire incorporated area of the City, expanding with annexations. All residential neighborhoods within the City are currently served. Service is still unavailable in some commercial areas due to market conditions, which presently preclude line extension. General Description and Location of Cable Television Facilities The current purveyor's facilities supplying Renton with cable television service are composed of a receiver, a headend, a trunk system and a feeder system. The receiver and the headend, which amplifies, processes and combines signals for distribution by the cable network, are located north of Bu nen, Washington. The signal is then transmitted via low -power microwave to a site in Kern, Washington, where it enters the trunk system. Amplifiers placed at intervals along the cables maintain signal strength. The amplifiers also serve as junction points where the feeder system taps into the trunk cables. Service drops then provide the final connection from the feeder line to the subscriber. Generally following street rights -of -way, the present network encompasses residential neighborhoods to the east, north, and south. The unserved portion of Renton generally includes the commercial and industrial areas located in the Green River Valley. Capacity of Cable Television Facilities A cable system is not subject to the same capacity constraints as other utilities. Providing and maintaining the capacity to serve is the contractual responsibility of the utility. According to the City s franchise agreement, the purveyor must make service available to all portions of the franchise area. In some circumstances, costs associated with a line extension may be home by the service recipient. The current purveyor offers various packages including as many as 130+ active analog and digital television channels plus nearly 40 digital music channels, and has the capacity to greatly increase those numbers as well as the other types of services that they may decide to offer in the future_ Forecasted Conditions- Cable TelevisionAccording to the provisions of the current purveyor's franchise agreement with the City, the company must continue to make cable service available upon request, when reasonable, for any property within the current or future city limits. Therefore, under the current terms of this franchise, the current purveyor would be required to provide cable service to projected growth within the City and the remainder of the Planning Area. Objective U-J: Promote the timely and orderly expansion of all forms of telecommunications services within the City and the remainder of its Planning Area. Policy U-100. Require that the siting and location collocated on existing structures and towers Of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in wherever possible and practical. a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. Policy U-102. Pursue the continued development of a wireless Internet communication grid throughout Policy U-101. Require that cellular communication the City for the use and enjoyment of Renton structures and towers be sensitively sited and residents, employees, and visitors. designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be Page 40 of 41 Policy U-103. Encourage healthy competition among telecommunication systems for provision of current and future telecommunication services. Page 41 of 41 ATTACHMENT E IX. GLOSSARY accessory housing: dwellings constructed within an existing single family home, usually for use as a rental unit. An "accessory unit" is a separate dwelling, including kitchen, sleeping, and bathroom facilities. Also known as "mother-in-law aparhncat." activity node: an area of clustered higher density land uses. adaptive use: the utilization of an older building that is no longer suited for its original purpose, but may be modified and used for a different purpose such as housing. A common example is the conversion of older public school buildings to rental or condominium apartments. affordable housing: housing that meets the needs of a household earning at or below eighty percent (80%) of county median income (adjusted for household size), for which the household pays no more than thirty percent (30%) of its gross income toward housing costs, including utilities. aquifer: Groundwater -bearing geologic formation or formations that contain enough saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells. aquifer protection area (APA): Zone of capture and recharge area for a well or well field owned or operated by the City of Renton. aquifer protection zones: Zones of an APA designated to provide graduated levels of aquifer protection. Each APA may be subdivided by the City into two aquifer protection zones. Zone 1: The land area situated between a well or well field owned by the City of Renton and the 365- day groundwater travel time contour. Zone 2: The land area situated between the 365-day groundwater travel time contour and the boundary of the zone of potential capture for a well or well field owned or operated by the City of Renton. Protected APA designated Zone 2: If the aquifer supplying water to a well, well field, or spring is fly pad by overlying geologic strata, the City of Renton may chose not to subdivide an APA into two zones. In such a rase, the entire APA will be designated as Zone 2. arterial, minor: right-of-way that serves as a distributor of traffic from a principal arterial to less important streets, directly to secondary traffic generators such as community shopping areas and high schools, and serves trips between neighborhoods within a community. Minor streets are more intensive than collectors, but less intensive than principal arterials. arterial, Principal: rightof-way that connects regional arterials to major activity areas and directly to traffic destinations. Principal arterials are the most intensive arterial classification, serve major traffic generators such as the urban Center, major shopping and commercial districts, and move traffic fim community to community. basin (Water Utility): An area defined by the natural features of the landscape such that any flow of water in said area will flow toward one low point. basin (Surface Water Utility): An area drained by a river and its tributaries Pace I of 13 Best Management Practices (Surface Water Utility): Conservation practices or systems of practices and management measures that: a. Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by nutrients, animal waste, toxins, and sediment; b. Minimize adverse impacts to surface water and groundwater flow, circulation patterns, and to the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of wetlands; and c. Include allowing proper use and storage of fertilizers/pesticides. bicycle facility: an improvement designed to facilitate accessibility by bicycle, including bicycle trails, bicycle lanes, storage facilities, etc. boulevards: typically a broad thoroughfare that is often separated by a landscaped modian or center divider that has potential to function as linear open space. Boulevard designation would imply a higher priority for landscape, sidewalk, or trail improvements. buildable lands analysis (BLA): a Washington State law that requires six Washington counties to determine the amount of land suitable for urban development, and evaluate its capacity for growth, based upon measurement of five years of actual development activity. King County (and five others) must report the results of the buildable lands analysis to the state every five years. capacity: the space to accommodate population growth or increases in employment or residential uses as determined by the methodology used in the Buildable Lands program capacity problem (wastewater utility): When flow rates exceed what the facility is designed to convey. capital facilities: as a general definition, structures, improvements, pieces of equipment or other major assets, including land. City capital facilities are provided by and for public purposes and services. cell (Cellular Telgmhoue Service): The geographic cellular telephone covewge area, approximately 2 to 10 miles in radius, served by a low -powered transmitters. cell site (Cellular Telephone Service): A communications site that includes the cellular transmitting and receiving antwmas, cellular base station radios, and intcromnocting equipment. Ibis equipment is necessary to route cellular telephone system through the mobile telephone switching office and connect to the conventional wireline telephone network. cell splitting (Cellular Telephone Service): The process of dividing a larger cell into several smaller units, to provide additional channels within the same cell. Chemicals (Surface Water Utility): All "Regulated Substances" as defined by the City of Renton in the Aquifer Protection Ordinance (APO). circuit: A set of conductors through which an electric current is intended to flow. Also called a "line" cluster development: a development design technique that concentrates buildings in specific areas on a site to allow the remaining land to be used for recreation, common open space, and preservation of environmentally critical areas. collocation: the concept of placing public facilities at or near the same location to provide increased public access. One example is the collocation of a public school with a community center. commercial use: a business or employment activity or other enterprise that is carried out for profit on a property by the owner, lessee, or licensee. community: a subarea of the city consisting of residential institutional and commercial land uses and sharing a common identity (In Renton, for example, the Highlands). community separator: See "Urban Separator" commute trip: a trip made from an employee's residence to a worksite for a regularly scheduled work day oammute trip reduction (CPR): a Washington State law requiring counties with a population greater than 150,000 to implement a plan to reduce single occupant commute trips and number of eourmute trip vehicle miles traveled per employee by employees of major public and private sector employers. The plan is developed in cooperation with local transit agencies, regional transportation planning organizations, major employers, and the owners of and employers at major worksites. concurrency: a Growth Management Act requirement that transportation facilities and other infrasWcture, such as water and sewer, needed to maintain adopted Level of Service ("LOS-) standards, are available within six years of development at the tine of occupancy or within a specified time period. conductor: A wire or cable intended to carry electric power, supported by poles towers or other structures. Countywide Planning Policies: as required by GMA, the King County Council adopted a series of policies that embody a vision of the future of King County. These policies (along with the Framework Policies) are intended to guide the development of Renton's Comprehensive Plan. critical eras: wetlands, aquifer recharge areas, fish and wildlife habitat, fiequemly flooded, and geologically hazardous areas regulated by the City of Renton's Critical Areas Ordinance. demand (Water Utility): The quantity of water obtained fro, the water supply source over a period of time to tried the needs of domestic, commercial, industrial and public use, and also fire fighting water, system losses, and miscellaneous other water uses. Demands are normally discussed in terms of flow rate, such as million gallons per day (mgd) or gallons per minute (Slim). The flow rates can be described in terns of a volume of water delivered during a certain time period. Flow rates pertinent to the analysis and design of water systems are: Average Daily Demand (ADD). The total amount of water delivered to the system in a year divided by the number of days in the year. This is further divided into average residential (ADDR), commercial (ADDC), industrial (ADDI), and unaccounted for (ADDN) demands. Maximum Month Demand. The total amount of water delivered to the system during the month of maximum water use. Peak Hour Demand. The amount of water delivered to the system in the hour of maximum use US-4 occurring during the maximum day. Page 2 of 13 Pane 3 of 13 density: the number of swelling units per net acre. Renton bases its density requirements on net density, in which environmentally sensitive areas, public rights -of -ways, and private access easements are subtracted from gross acreage before density is calculated. density bonus: incentive provided to a developer of housing, in exchange for meeting a specified condition or conditions such as quality of design or provision of a certain type of housing unit or other use. detention/retention facilities: Facilities designed either to hold runoff for a short period of time and then release it to the point of discharge at a controlled rate or to hold water for a considerable length of time and then consume it by evaporation, plants or infiltration into the ground. development standards: in respect to any development, fixed requirements or standards imposed by ordinance and regulation . in Renton, development standards are included in the Renton Mmicgxd Code Tide IV, "Development Regulations.,, dupkr: a residential building containing two attached dwelling units under one roof, located on a single lot. In the Renton Municipal Code, such units are called "flats." dwelling unit: one or more roans located within a structure, desigoedas and arranged for living accommodations, and occupied or intended to be occupied by not more than one family and permitted roaners and boarders, independent from any other family. The existence of a food preparation area and sanitation facilities within the room or rooms shall be evidence of the existence of a dwelling unit. Dormitories, institutional housing, and other group quarters are not counted as dwelling units. equal®g storage (Water Utility): Equalizing storage provides the difference between the capacity of the sources of supply and the maximum demand rate (generally considered the highest use hour of the hottest day of the year). In water systems which service a large number of residences, the demand for water varies hourly and supply fircilities are sized to meet the average rate of the maximum day demand. The nhaxduvnc hour demand rate is typically about twice the average maximum day rate. if equalizing storage is not available to provide water during peak bars, the supply facilities and major pipelines would have to be sized for the maximum hour demands. However, during non -peak hours, much of the supply capacity would not be used. Instead, equalizing storage facilities are used to make up the difference between maximum hour and maximum day demand. The stored water is released when demand exceeds the supply, and replenished when the supply exceeds demand. In this way supply facilities and pipelines can be smaller than if equalizing storage is not available, and, therefore, lower costs for supply and pipeline facilities are obtained. feeder system (Cable Television Service): The line that carries the signal from a trunk lice amplifier to the subscriber's service drop, fiber optic cable: A mulb4ayered cable composed of fine strands of glass fibers capable of transmitting large quantities of coded data by means of modrdated light rather than elmuonic signals. R is preferred as a medium for television signals as it can carry more signals with less dissipation. fireflow: The rate of flow of water required during fire fighting fire storage: Reservoir capacity required to meet fire flows. force main: A sanitary sewer main that utilizes artificial means (pressure) to transport waste. A force main usually moves sewage from a lower elevation to or across a higher elevation. A lift station typically pumps sewage from one basin through a force main to another basin. functional plans: city deparhnents prepare Planning documents that establish long-range goals and objectives to guide their operations and capital development requests. These plans, referred to as functional plans, typically represent the ideal goals for the department in prov iding ding urban services and facilities. gate station (Natural Gas Service): The point at which gas from Northwest Pipeline enters the Puget Sand Energy system, where oderant is added for safety, pressure is reduced to 200 to 300 psi, and the gas is metered. gateway: a point of entry that identifies a transition between different land uses, landscapes and jurisdictional boundaries and enhances a feeling of anticipation and arrival for the approaching traveler. geologically hazardous: areas which may be prone to one or more of the following conditions —erosion, flooding, landslides, coal mine hazards, or seismic activity. gravity sewer, A sanitary sewer main installed with the intention of utlllm% gravity or "down hill flaw" to move the waste. The maximum capacity for a gravity sewer is the volume of flow that can be carried in a sewer at a depth to diameter ratio of 0.70. greenbeh: an area intended for open space, recreation, very low density residential uses, agriculture geographic relief between land uses, or other low intensity uses. Growth Management Act (GMA) of 1990: a law passed by the Washington State Legislature in 1990 and amended periodically thereafter that mandates comprehensive planning in designated counties and cities statewide. (RCW 36.70A) hazardous waste: Any wastes included in the State of Washington, Department of Ecology Dangerous Waste Regulations, chapter 173-303 of the Washington Administrative Cade (WAC). headend (Cable Television Service): The electronic equipment that amplifies and processes television signals from all sources. After being assigned a channel, the signals leave via the trunk system. heavy industrial: a type of land use including manufacturing processes using raw materials, extractive land uses, and any industrial uses that typically are incompatible with adjacent uses due to noise, odor, toxic chemicals, or other activities which could pose a hazard to public health and safety. high -occupancy vehicle (HDV): generally, a vehicle carrying two or more people, including a carpool, vanpool, or bus. housing unit: any dwelling unit, housekcepirg unit, guest room, dormitory, or single -occupancy unit impact fees: a See imposed on developers to pay for the communityAs casts of providing services to a new development. Such charges are an extension of efforts to make new development pay for their impact on the community. Impact Sees may also involve some effort to predict the total cast of the community for servicing the new development and relate it to the revenues that will be produced by the development once it is completed. impervious surface: A hard surface area which either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle under natural conditions prior to development, and/or a hard surface that causes water to rim, off the PI.— a of 11 Pate 5 of 13 surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions Prior to development. Common examples include, but are not limited to, rooftops, walkways, patios, decks, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gavel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam, or other surfaces that similarly impede the natural infiltration of storm water. industrial: a type of land use characterized by production, manufacturing, distribution or fabrication activities. infill development: development consisting of either construction on one or more lots in an area that is mostly developed, or new construction between two existing structures. infill housing: construction of new dwelling units on vacant or underutilized parcels in built-up areas. Because utilities, transit, and other infrastructure are already in place, the costs and impacts of new units are generally lower than for development on raw land. infiltration (Wastewater Utility): Infiltration is the entrance of ground water into the sanitary sewer system through cracks, pores, breaks, and defective joints in the sewer piping network. inflow: Inflow refers to direct flow of storm water into sanitary sewer systems through hookups from storm water collection facilities and illegal connections. infrastructure: the underlying foundation, or basic framework of a city. The system of essential services, utilities, public and community facilities, e.g. water, sewerage, power, roads, schools, health facilities etc., which are necessary to enable urban development to function. institution: a structure (or structures) and related grounds used by organizations providing educational, medical, social, and recreational services to the community such as hospitals, vocational or fine arts schools, child care centers, whether operated for nonprofit or profit -making purposes; and nonprofit organizations such as colleges and universities, elementary and secondary schools, commodity paters and clubs, private clubs, religious facilities, museums, and institutes for advanced study. intensive office: nud to high-rise office development including structured parking typically located in areas with regional transportation access. intermediate pressure Cip) distribution main: Underground Imes varying from 1.25 to 6 mites in diameter. Pressure averages 35 psi. jobsthousing balance: a term representing the ratio between jobs and housing within a specified area. The jobslhoustog balance can influence housing costs and transportation demand. land use zoning: traditionally, a technical or physical approach to the segregation of incompatible land uses, such as residential and industrial use, through systems of land use and development controls. More recently, the techniques have emphasized reinforcing position relationships between compatible land uses such as residential and neighborhood pxnmercial. The contemporary approach also emphasizes the close relationship between transportation and land use to more effectively respond to accessibility, reduction of infrastructure coats, urban design, air, noise, and water pollution, energy conservation, and conservation of resource lands. landfill: A disposal facility, or part of a facility, where solid waste is permanently placed in or on land and which is not a land spreading disposal facility. large scale multi -family: a residential building, or group of buildings that contain more than four dwelling units in each building. level -of -service (LOS): a qualitative rating of how well some unit of transportation supply (e.g-, streot, intersection, sidewalk, bikeway, transit route, ferry) meets its current or projected demand. linear parks: parks which are long and narrow, and follow a natural or man-made corridor such as a road or stream course. lift station: A sewage pumping facility that consists of a wet well for collecting wastewater, mechanical equipment such as Pumps, valves and piping, electrical and control equipment, and a force main. The maximum capacity for a lift station is equal to the peak, wet weather flow that the largest pump within the lift station has been designed to convey. fight industrial: a type of land use including small scale or less intensive production, manufacturing distribution or fabricating activities. Some office activities and supporting convemence retail activities may also be included. looping main (Natural Gas Service): A main which connects to a supply line at both ends, thereby Providing an alternate route for natural gas to travel to an area needing additional supply. manufactured housing: a broad term including mobile homes, modular homes, and other "factory built" housing. The main distinction between manufactured hones and site -built bones is that manufactured homes are created in one or moue parts away from the site, and then transported to a. "Red Sea,, manufactured homes are built to HUD standards, with the chassis included as a permanent part of the home, although the axles must be removed when the home is installed. These homes, however, are built so that they may be Pied on a permanent f modation. "Gold Seal" modular homes are constructed in a factory m several pieces that may be smaller or I= complete than the pieces of a "Red Sea,' manufactured home. Gold Seal homes are built to the speoificab ms of the Uniform Building Code, and are placed on a Permanent foundation, similar to a "stick -built" home. Unlike Red Seal homes, the chassis for transportation is not a permanent part of the home. Mobile homes, as opposed to manufacture d or modular horses, are typically located in established mobile home parks and were built betake HUD standards for mare f icbrred housing went into effioct June 15, 1976. master plan: a plan that shows how proposed development will comply with the development standards in the applicable zoning. It also is intended to show compatibility of development within the Master Plan, and compatibility of anticipated uses in areas adjacent to and abutting the Master Plan area. It provides long- term guidance for a smaller area than a Conceptual Plan, but a larger area than a detailed Site Plan, Metro: Metro is a coney -wide agency run by Metropolitan King County that provides regularly scheduled public transit service (both express and local service), park and ride lots, vampools, ride -sharing, and customized service to rocet people with special needs. Metro is also a regional sewage treatment agency charged with the collection, treatment, and disposal of sewage from the City of Renton and much of King County. minimum density: a development standard that sets the least amount of density permitted in a residential zone and results in a more efficient use of urban land than might otherwise be attained through market forces. mitigation (Surface Water Utility): Avoiding, minimizing or compensating for adverse wetland impacts. Mitigation, in the following order of preference, is: a.. r r11 Paw 7of13 a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking deliberate steps to avoid or reduce impacts; c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; e. Compensating for the impact by restoring or providing substitute resources or environments f. Monitoring the impact and the compensation project and taking appropriate corrective measures. Mitigation for individual actions may include a combination of the above measures. mixed use: the presence of more than one category of use in a structure or development project, for example, a mixture of residential units and retail or offices in the same building or if in separate buildings, in close proximity to one another. mode: types of transportation available for use, such as a bicycle, an automobile, or a bus. mode -split: the proportion of total Persons using a Particular mode of travel. in this document, mode -split generally refers to the percentage of people using public transportation as opposed to other motorized modes. multi -family use: a structure or portion of a structure containing two or more dwelling units. multi -modal: referring to accessibility by a variety of trawl modes, typically pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and automobile modes, but may also include water and air transport nodes. natural gas: For the most part methane, a naturally occurring mixture of hydrocarbon and non - hydrocarbon gases found in Porous geologic formations beneath the earths surlaoe often in association with petroleum. neighborbood commercial: small commercial areas providing limited retail goods and services such as groceries and dry cleaning for nearby customers. net density: a calculation of the number of lousing units that would be allowed on a property after sensitive areas, public streets, and private access easements are subtracted from the gross area (gross acres minus strcets, easements, and sensitive areas multiplied by allowable housing units per acre). Ibis calculation applies to residential uses only. Northwest Pipeline: Interstate pipeline providing gas to Puget Sound Energy. Pressure varies from 600 to 900 Psi in two parallel pipes, 26 and 30 inches in diameter, off -site release rates (Surface Water Utility): As a result of development, the peak release rate of water from the developed Property during the design storm. on -street parking: Parking spaces in the rights -of -way open space: any area of land, or water which provides physical or visual relief from the developed environment. Open space may be essentially unimproved and set aside, designated or reserved for public use or enjoyment, or for the private use and enjoyment of adjacent property owners. Open space may also consist of undeveloped or developed areas including urban plazas, Parks, pedestrian corridors, Landscaping Pastures, woodlands, greenbelts, wetlands, and other natural areas or strect rightsof-way which provide visual relief within developed areas. The term does not include driveway, parking lots, or other surfaces designed for vehicular travel. outiall: The Point, location, or structure where wastewater or other conduit drainage discharges from a sewer, drain or P-1 Channel: An existing channel in the lower Green River Valley that transports the surface water flows of Springbrook Creek to the Black River Pump Station. peak flow (wastewater utility): The maximum amount of sewage, either actual or estimated, that must be transported through the system in a given time (usually in gallons per minute). Peak flow is usually measured or calculated during the wettest time of the year when rain and high ground water add inflow and infiltration to the normal flow of the system at the time of day when domestic use is the greatest. Peak hour: one -hour interval within the peak period when travel demand is usually highest, e.g. 7:30-8:30 a.m. and 4:30-530 p.m. Pedestrian -orientated: a type of development where the location and access to buildings, types of uses permitted on the street level, and design of building facades are based on the needs of people on foot. Pedestrian facility: an mVfOvcffw designed to facilitate accessibility by foot or wheelchair, including sidewalks, curb ramps, crosswalks, overpasses and undercrossings, etc. pipeline: Buried pipe systems (including all pipe, pipe joints, fittings, valves, manholes, sumps, and appurtenances that are in contact with the substance being transported) utilised for the conveyance of regulated substances. Pipelines include, but are not limited to, sanitary sewers, side sewers, leachate pipelines, and product pipelines, such as petroleum. Planning Area: A geographic area as specifically defined on a map in a comprehensive plan that is a logical area for expansion of the system. Conversion of a planning area to a utility service area requires Kong County approval of an amendment to a comprehensive plan. Pig: essentially a map of a piece of land which slows the location, boundaries, area, detail of lot boundaries, proposed streets, utilities, public areas, and all other necessary data to demonstrate compliance with subdivision regulations; state statutes Provide for the recording of plats, and the selling of lots or parcels of land by referring to the recorded plat. It is usually unlawful to sell land by referring to an unrecorded plat. Potential Annexation Area (PAA): The area within the Urban Growth Area that is not already incorporated as a city and is designated for fid ure annexation by specific cities. pre -development levels (Surface Water Utility): The rate of flow under a design storm occurrence that would occur in absence of the planned development. Pressure zone (water utility): A water system subsection operating from one source at a common hydraulic elevation. Pam R of 1 i Page 9 of 13 public facilities: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, park and recreational facilities, schools and public buildings. public works: Ile City of Renton's Planning/Building/Public Works Department. recyelables (Solid Waste Utility): Newspaper, uncoated mixed paper, aluminum, glass and metal, food and beverage containers, Polyethylene terepthalate (PET # 1) plastic bottles, High Density Polyethylene (HDPE #2) plastic bottles, and such other materials that the City and contractor determine to be recyclable. residential use: any land use that provides for living space. Examples include artist studio/dwelling, boarding house' caretaker's quarters, single family, multi -family, special residence, floating homes, and mobile home park. rezoning: raAnmg is a change in the designation or boundaries of property as shown on the Official Zoning Map and defined in Title IV of the Renton Municipal Code. Rezoning is a legislative act and can be legal only if enacted by the governing body. Rezoning can take two forms: 1) a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (revision or modification of the zoning text and citywide map), or 2) a change in the zoning classification of a particnilar parcel or parcels, without a change in the Comprehensive Plan land use designation. rights -of -way: the rights -of -way is the right to pass over or otherwise use designated property. It usually refers to a strip of land legally established for public use by Pedestrians, vehicles, or utilities. nmof * that portion of precipitation that flows over land surface and enters a natural drainage system or constructed scorn sewer system during and immediate following a storm. rural area: a sparsely developed area located outside of the Urban Growth undeveloped or primarily used for Area, where the land agicultual, forestry, resource extraction, very low density residential uses, or open space purposes. sanitary sewer: A piping system that carries liquid and waterbome wastes from residences, commercial buildings, industrial plants, and institutions, together with minor quantities of ground, storm, and surface waters that are not admitted intentionally. SEPA: See State Fnvironmental Policy Act. service area: A geographic area within which service to customers is available as specifically defined on a map in a utilities service plan and approved by Kwg County. service drop (Cable Television Service): Smaller diameter cable that runs from a feeder Ime to the subscriber's television. side sewer: In plumbing, the extension from the building drain to the public sewer or other place of disposal. Also called house connection or side sewer (private). A side sewer stub is that portion of the side sewer between the collector sewer and the individual property line. single -occupant vehicle (SOV): a vehicle carrying only one person solid waste: a general term for discarded materials destined for disposal, but not discharged to a sewer or to the atmosphere. special benefit districts: subareas of a community designated by city ordinance to assess paymenu for construction or installation of public facilities which primarily benefit the property owners within the district. special needs housing: this category refers to housing that is provided for low income or indigent persons and, where applicable, their dependents who, by virtue of disability or other personal factors, face serious impediments to independent living and who require special assistance and services in order to sustain appropriate housing on a permanent, long -arm or transitional basis. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA): the state law passed in 1971 requiring state and local agencies to consider environmental impacts in the decision -making process. storm sewer or storm drain: a sewer that carries storm water and surface water, street wash and other wash waters, or drainage, but excludes domestic wastewater and industrial wastes. storm water: water originating from precipitation, surface ninoff shallow ground water, or other drainage that does not include domestic wastewater or industrial wastes. strip commercial: an area occupied by businesses along an arterial street, located in one-story structures or platted lots and/or small shopping centers arranged in a line and set back fiom the street to allow front of store parking lots with individual draiveway entrances and individual parking. structured parking: vehicle parking within a building having one or more stories. surface parking: open lots or grounds with at -grade vehicle parking facilities. townhouse: a form of ground -related housing where individual dwelling units are attached along at least one cemrnon wall to at least one other dwelling unit. Each dwelling unit occupies space from the ground to the roof. transfer of development rights (TDRs): a program in which the amused portion of a "sending" pnopcay's zoned capacity -one of the separable rights of property —is sold to the developer of a "roceivhg" site, who is allowed to add the capacity to the zoned limit of that site. transfer station: permanent, fired, supplemental collection and transportation facility, used by puns and route collection vehicles to deposit collected solid waste fiom off -site into a larger transfer vehicle for transport to a solid waste handling facility. Transfer stations may also include recycling faa ones and compaction/baling systems. transit: public transportation by public bus, light rail, heavy rail, and commuter rail transport, but not ferries or vanpools. transportation demand management (TDM): a system for reducing traffic congestion and provide multi - modal transportation opportunities. Implemented in Washington State through the Commute Trip Reduction law. See Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) definition. transportation improvement Program (TIP): a plan adopted by a jurisdiction that details the priority for improvements to the transportation system related mfiastructure and the means and methods of financing those improvements. transportation systems management (TSM): accommodating transportation demand by using the existing supply more efficiently and by emphasizing lower cost improvements that can be implemented Poor. to of 17 Pane 11 of 13 quickly. For example, converting a general purpose traffic lane into a transitway might increase the person -carrying capacity of a highway more easily and quickly than widening the highway for additional traffic lanes. trunk system (Cabe) Television Service): The cables that carry signals from the headend to the feeder lines. Since the signal loses strength as it travels down the cable, a series or cascade of amplifiers, located at intervals along its length, boost signal strength. undeveloped rights -of -way: any undeveloped portion of a strip of land legally established for the use of pedestrians, vehicles, or utilities. upzoning: a change in the zoning classification of land to a classification allowing more intensive development, such as a change from single family to multi -family. urban center: defined by the Countywide Planning Policies, recognized by the Puget Sound Regional Council, and so designated by City Council Resolution, the Urban Center is an area of Renton with existing and/or future high employment concentration, residential use at high density, and accessibility. These areas promote non-SOV mobility, reduce sprawl, and maxim= benefits of existing public investment. urban growth area: area designated by the City and endorsed by the County for development over the next twenty years as required by the Growth Maoagemeat Act. Urban growth patterns should not occur outside these areas. urban separator: corridors of natural areas or very low density rural development between higher density urban areas. Examples include lands useful for open space, wildlife habitat, recreation trails and connection of critical areas, agricultural uses, or lands which have a coral character. Also sometimes referred to as "Community Separator." utilities: All lines and facilities related to the provision, dminbution, collection, transmission, or disposal of water, storm and sanitary sewage, oil, gas, power, information, telecommunication and telephone cable, and includes facilities for the generation of electricity. Vision 2020: Puget Sound Regional Council's 1990 adopted regional comprehensive vision that describes linking high -density residential and employment centers throughout the region by high capacity transit and promoting a multi -modal transportation system. wastewater: The spent or used water of a community or industry that contains dissolved and suspended contaminants that cannot be discharged directly to a lake, stream, or river. wetlands: areas characterized by the presence of surface or groundwater at a frequency or duration to support vegetation adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. For the purposes of inventory, incentives, and non -regulatory programs, those lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the land is covered by shallow water. For the purposes of regulation, wetlands are defined by the Federal Manual for the Regulation and Delineation of Jurisdictional Wetlands pursuant to this Chapter, Section 4-32-3.C. Wetlands crated or restored as part of a mitigation project are regulated wetlands. Wetlands intentionally created for purposes other than wetland mitigation, including but not limited to, stonnwater management, wastewater treatment or landscape amenities, drainage ditches are not considered regulated wetlands, wildlife habitat: an area characterized by wildlife that forage, nest, spawn, or migrate through, in search Of food and shelter. yard waste (Solid Waste Utility): Includes leaves, grass, prunings and clippings of woody as well as fleshy plants. Materials larger than two inches (2") in diameter and four feet (4) in length shall not be considered yard waste. No. 17 r,f t 3 Page 13 of 13 V CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (GRIFFIN HOME AND VICINITY) FROM RESIDENTIAL 1 DU/AC (R-1) TO RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC (R 4) ZONING, FILE NO. LUA-05-006 (CPA 2005-M 1, AREA B). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residential 1 du/ac; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 5, 2005, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential. 4 du/ac (FL 4), as herembelow specified. The EDNSP ORDINANCE NO. Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Property consisting of approximately 6.8 acres located along Lake Washington Boulevard and N. 26 h Street). SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1228:11/21/05:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 9►11 2005. 2 ATTACHMENT A GRIFFIN HOME AND VICINITY REZONE R 1 TO R4 LUA 05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, AREA B LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 29 of Eldon Acres, as recorded in Volume I 1 of Plats, Page 86-A and 86-B, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT the easterly 30 feet thereof dedicated for road as recorded under King County Recording No. 8408209013; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lot 30 of said plat lying southerly of the north 123.12 feet thereof; and lying easterly of the west 100 feet thereof; and TOGETHER WITH Lots 32 through 38, inclusive, of said plat; EXCEPT that portion of Lot 32 deeded for road per King County Recording No. 8811150481; TOGETHER WITH that portion of road (Pelly Place N) that attaches by Operation of Law, per City of Renton Street Vacation Ordinance No. 41 S8; and TOGETHER WITH Lots 42 through 47, inclusive, of said plat; EXCEPT those portions for road (Lake Washington Blvd. N); All situate in Government Lot I and in the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North, Range 5 North, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. k Attachment B Griffin Home and Vicinity Rezone from R-1 to R-4 1UA05-006, CPA 2005-M-9, Area B Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic planing ♦ ♦ Alen Pisxrcb, Administrator G. Dal Rom& e) 16 November 2W5 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOUTHPORT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM COMMERCLA.L OFFICE RESIDENTIAL (COR) ZONING TO URBAN CENTER NORTH 2 (UC-142) FILE NO. LUA-05406, (CPA 2005-M-07 SOUTHPORT). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Commercial Office Residential (COR); and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 5, 2005, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: S) ON I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Urban Center- North 2 (UC-N2) as hereinbelow specified. The ORDINANCE NO. EDNSP Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Approximately 17 acres south of Lake Washington). SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1227:11/21/05:ma Bonnie Walton, City Clerk day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor ATTACHMENT A SOUTHPORT REZONE FROM COR TO UC-N2 LUA 05-005, CPA 2005-M-07 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. LUA-99-134-SHPL, as recorded under King County Recording No. 20000131900006, records of King County, Washington; All situate in the south half (1/2) of the southwest quarter of Section 5, and the north half (1 /2) of the northwest quarter of Section 8, all in Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. Southport Rezone from COR to UC-N2 LUA05-006, CPA 2005-M-7 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Alex Pietsck Administrator G. Del Rosario 16 November 20115 CITY OF RENTON, WASUNGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 2006. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION_L After due notice and public hearing thereon as provided by law, the annual budget for the City of Renton for the year 2006, previously prepared and filed with the City Clerk, as modified hereby, be and is hereby ratified, confirmed and adopted, in all respects, as such annual budget for the year 2006. Such annual budget is detailed in Attachment A, 2006 Budget Summary by Fund, Resources and Expenditures, which is incorporated herein as if fully set forth. Another ordinance, to be adopted by December 2005, fixes the amount of tax levies necessary for the year 2006. SECTION U. Attachment A defines the total sums authorized and allowed for expenditures and establishes such sums in each of the funds in the annual 2006 budget. SECTION III. The following funds are hereby created: Water Utility Operations Fund (Fund 405) Wastewater Operations Fund (Fund 406) Storm Water Utility Operations Fund (Fund 407) King County Metro Fund (Fund 416) Water Utility Construction Fund (Fund 425) Wastewater Utility Construction Fund (Fund 426) ORDINANCE NO. Storm Water Utility Construction Fund (Fund 427) Information System Fund (Fund 503) as illustrated in Attachment A. SECTION W. Acts pursuant to this Ordinance, but prior to its passage or effective date, are hereby ratified and confirmed. SECTION V. A copy of the annual 2006 budget, as herein adopted, shall be transmitted to the Office of the State Auditor, Division of Municipal Corporations, and such other governmental agencies as provided by law. SECTION VL This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of . 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1217:11 / 16/05 : ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 0� ORDINANCE NO. ATTACHMENT A 2006 Budget Summary By Fund, Resources and Expenditures 2006 2006 Fund Resources Expenditures GENERAL GOVERNMENT FUNDS: 000/General $50,096,256 $50,096,256 004/Community Dev Block Grant 262,257 262,257 007/Parking Garage Maintenance 0 0 010/Fire Memorial Fund 0 0 101/Park 11,260,376 11,260,376 103/Street 6,738,878 6,738,878 106/Library 1,809,862 1,809,862 201/ Ltd G.O. Bonds/Gen. Govt. Misc. Debt Sery 990,300 990,300 207/1978 Limited G.O. Bonds 21,500 21,500 212/1989 Limited Ref. G.O. Bonds 0 0 215/Gen. Govt. Misc. Debt Service 1,800,800 1,800,800 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: 102/Arterial Street 440,000 440,000 104/Community Dev Block Grant 0 0 107/Parking Garage Operations Fund 0 0 110/Hotel/Motel Fund 220,000 220,000 118/Reserve for Paths & Trails 0 0 125/1% For Art 60,000 60,000 127/Cable Communication 143,900 143,900 131/Park Memorial 0 0 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS: 213/1983 Unlim. Ref. G.O. Bonds 0 0 219/1989 Unlimited G.O. Bonds 518,400 518,400 220/L.I.D. Debt Service Fund 32,025 32,025 221/L.I.D. Guaranty Fund 0 0 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS (CIP): 301/Garage CIP 0 0 303/Community Dev. Mitigation Fund 255,000 255,000 304/Fire Mitigation Fund 525,000 525,000 305/Transportation Mitigation Fund 1,984,800 1,984,800 306/Leased City Properties 904,902 904,902 307/Aquatics Center 0 0 316/Municipal Facilities CIP 3,177,000 3,177,000 317/Transportation CIP 18,283,700 18,283,700 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. ATTACHMENT A 2006 Budget Summary By Fund, Resources and Expenditures 2006 2006 Fund Resources Expenditures ENTERPRISE FUNDS: 401/Waterworks Utility 0 0 402/Airport 2,416,800 2,416,800 403/Solid Waste Utility 9,510,248 9,510,248 404/Golf Course 2,421,880 2,421,880 405/Water Utility Operation Fund 8,359,528 8,359,528 406/Wastewater Operation Fund 3,930,762 3,930,762 407/Storm Water Utility Operation Fund 3,241,951 3,241,951 416/King County Metro Fund 8,418,000 8,418,000 421/Waterworks Utility Construction 0 0 424/Golf Course Capital Fund 250,000 250,000 425/Water Utility Construction Fund 6,715,000 6,715,000 426/Wastewater Utility Construction Fund 2,600,000 2,600,000 427/Storm Water Utility Construction Fund 2,300,000 2,300,000 45 1 /Waterworks Revenue Bond Fund 3,211,800 3,211,800 461/Waterworks Bond Reserve 0 0 471/Waterworks Rate Stablilization 0 0 481/2004 Water/Sewer Bonds 0 0 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS: 50 1 /Equipment Rental 3,255,110 3,255,110 502/Insurance 3,007,503 3,007,503 503/Information System Fund 3,431,550 3,431,550 512/Healthcare Insurance 7,219,009 7,219,009 522/LEOFF 1 Retirees Healthcare Insurance Fund 1,748,130 1,748,130 FIDUCIARY FUNDS: 601/Firemen's Pension 457,300 457,300 TOTALS $172,019,527 $172,019,527 2 of 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ZONING DISTRICTS — USES AND STANDARDS OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" REVISING LAND USES IN THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION (RC) AND RESIDENTIAL-1 DU/AC (R 1) ZONES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Section 4-2-060, "Zoning Use Table — Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations", of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown in Attachment `A'. SECTION II. Section 4-2-070.A, Resource Conservation (RC), of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment `B'. SECTION IIL Section 4-2-070.B, Residential-1 DU/AC (R-1) of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts -- Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment C,. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY TBE MAYOR this day of 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1219:11/18/05:ma ATTACHMENT A 4 2-M ZONING USE TABLE — USES ALLOWED IN ZONING DESIGNATIONS ld►IY._.i 'ill: ` • _ ...... iiiiiiipiiitiiipiii� i��ii�■ii■r�ar�ca�ii■i�■i�ii�i�i�iii�ii ■i li■ L •i ' mum ` MM ' • L- •!-h ih:.hr. ��m�v...r ►' � u' ___iYiWiS1Ll'r1ii_�iY.©� MUM Pepe i ATTACHMENT A Blank ■ Not Nrowed AC P ■ Perrnkted ' " Use H ■ Hearing Examiner Conditional Use AD • Administrative Conditionsi Use S ■ Condkaon(s) PS ` Permitted (Provided condition can be met) Uses may be further restricted try: RMC 4-3-M. Airport RNaled HOW and Use Restriction; RMC 4-3-OW, Aquifer Pmtedlon Regulations; RMC 4-3.o4m. Uses PWMN►Ad In r►,. e,a,,., " I...__. — Distracts; RMC 4.3-M. Shoreline Master Pwwv f�a..,,7.....�..� MM icmill LiA0��0�MLi0om""Mm tm • .00�:7�700000000i�1�700ii © iiiiiii�00A ©teltiti�p�r� .• �fT7n 11 uL ' Page 2 ATTACHMENT A $lent ■trot Allowed AC ■ Acoeasory Use P a ParmitEed AD a Administrative Cad@lmol Use III ■ ��(Exami Examiner Conditional Use PS Parmilled (Prowl i condition can be met) Uses may be f nowr wed by., RMC 4-3-020, AkWrt Related MeigM and Use Rsstdoilon, RMC 43-0500, Aquifer Protection Regulatt m. RMC 434340C- Un. Dlstriofe: RMC 4.3-M. 3hermWrm Most., a..,,, — e� •../._ .......m®©©..©m.-�©'' f . «• ©i©©©iiiiiiiiiii©�� mmmmmmommmmmmummumm f71 r7,1• '7• ••, Tr iiiiiiii�,�.l7i®�1C����YJ♦ Le =1711 ' liiiiiii�L���pp�7� •- • - iiiiii�i0�0i�iii��� - I �:J - •I • r� ++77 ii©©©© KK ©i�7©�®gyp®®�7 •/ iiiii©©©iiii©©©p�7�� ' • 1 •. iiiiiiii��®®ii��iii�� alanrz - rna AUGV a AC - Acoessory the H a Hearing Ezernitwr Conditional Use P • Pettrtfaed AD = Adminkdrstive Conditional Use O - Conditions) Page 3 ATTACHMENT A PS ■ Permitted (Provided condition can be met) Uses may be further reatrlofed by: RMC 4.3.02p. Airport Related HeWM and Use Restriction: RMC 44.050C, Aquifer Protection Regulations: RMC 4-3.040C, Usea Permitted in the Aid.0 �.�...,,..e.. �.. Districts: RMC 4-3-090. Shoreline Mewder w� a....r e..._..� ' .. -.------©©©MM©--- iiiiiiii 901-2 iKd� F, KXTI L-7�iSQBA� iiiiiiiiLT•��iii0i��i�� ITEiiiiiiiiiiiEW • iiiiiiiii©iiiiiii�� ... .,..t .• . .. iiiiiiiitii0[���i1Q�0�fl�1Q�f�� iiiiiiiim�'-�7��7i�'•��iii�� • �•' iiiiiiiii0t�iiiiii�� iiiiiiii��.-��..•��;E.7ii�"c�!0�JiO�iC! tslgnx +?W snowed AC - Accessory Use H - Hearing Examiner Conditional Use P u Permitted AD w Admintatrative Conditional Uee 9 a CondRion(s) P# 0 Permitted (Provided oondttion can be met) Page 4 ATTACHMENT A Uses may be � -- ..s...�.further restricted by 4-3-020, Related Districts; RMC 4-3-M. Sheralinw ..* w.,,..e.., oe.MOW and Use Restriction; RMC 4-3-0 C, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4.34mm tJ� ae.�,�. � �. #I._ A..._—, , ...__ mtl YYM1ilV1111 and fabrication medium MQnuhwtufft and tabNcatfan, tlyM Solid WA Recyoft oolelction and proosssing center Reoydin0 ooltectlon station disposalSawage arrd trnatmem Waste reovoll and transfer fact lkles O. TIEti P P14 P P P38 P PP67 Pig P N P P P P38 P P P p23 P P Communloati" broadcast and relay H H H H H H H ovvers H H38 H29 H38 H H H H H N Electrical power generation aadcogeneration H H66 H68 H66 H66 H86 H66 H66 H66 H66 Uttlkles *mail UtNitbs medium P P AD C AD P P P33 P P P P P P P P P P P P W la H AD AD AD A AD AD AD AD EXIM FA H HH I H H H IH N I H I H I H Lattice towers support structures Macro fact a as AD, AD46 AD46 AD 6 AD46 M48 P44 AD47 PM A047 A047 F48 H48 AD47 H48 AD47 Ha o antennas P PP P P P P44 PM P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 H H Mini faok antennas tvltnor moditlCatlons to existing vahebas P44 P49 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P44 P P44 P P44 P P44 P P44 P P44 P P44 P P44 P P44 P P44 P P44 AD P AD P communication faoUttles 449 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P49 P P monopole 1 support structures Monopole II support structuresM43 H45 H45 H45 1445 H46 ht45 Hob AD46 P44 P44 P44 IAD46 PM P44 AD46 P44 AD48 ACC RY >l4:S AD47 AO47 AD47 I H48I HO AD47 H48 AD47 H48 Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-OW and as AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC AC defined in Chapter 4.11 RMC, where not AC AC AC AC AC AC Otherwise listed in Use Table R. T11MPORAItY 1 Ums Model homes In an approved residential P53 FM P53 P53 P53 P53 PS3 P53 P53 development: one model home on an P53 P53 P53 exFatkrg lot Saies/marladirrg trailers, on-ske P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 P53 PM P53 PS3 P53 P10 P10 Temporary or manufactured buildings used for construction P10 P10 P10 1310 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 P10 NO P1 0 P10 P10 P10 I P10 7;10 10 P10 Tem uses P53 f P53 I P53 P53 P53 PWI P53 P53 I P53 I P53 PS3 P53 P53 I P53 PS3 P53 PAj' essay use H a Hearing Examiner Conditional Use P - Pemdtod AD a Administrative Conditional Use 0 = Condltlon(s) P8 ■ Permitted (Provided condition can be met) Uses may be further restricted by: RMC 4-0-020, Airport Related Height and Use Restriction; RMC 4-3-MOC, Aquifer Protection Regulations; RMC 4-3-040C, Uses Permitted in the Automall Improvement Districts; RMC 4.3-M, Shoreline Master Program Requirements (Ord. 4738, 8-24-1996; Ord. 4773, 3-22-1999:Ord. 4777, 4-19-1999; Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999; Ord 4803, 10-25.1999; Ord 4827, 1-244000; Ord 4340, 541-2000; Ord 4857, 8.21- 2000; Ord. 4915, 8-27-2001; Ord. 4917, 9-17-2001; Amd. Ord. 4963, 5.13-2002; Ord. 4971, e-10-2002:Ord. 4982, 9.23-2002; Ord. 4999, 1-13-2003; Ord 5027, 11-24-2003) Page 5 ATTACHMENT B 4-2-070A RESOURCE CONSERVATION (RC) Uses allowed in the RC Zone are as follows: USES: TYPE: AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES Agriculture P Natural resource eAractionlrecovery H ANIMALS AND RELATED USES Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small animals per acre) P #51 Animal husbandry (4 or fewer medium animals per acre) P #51 Animal husbandry (ma)imum of 1 large animal per acre) P #51 Greater number of animals than allowed above H #36 Beekeeping P #35 Kennels AD #37 Kennels, hobby AC #37 Pets, common household, up to 3 per dwelling unit or business establishment AC Stables, commercial AD #37 RESIDENTIAL Detached dwelling P#19 muifaaWW Homes Manufactured homes, designated P#19 OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND HOME OCCUPATIONS Accessory dwelling unit AD #7 Adult family home P Group homes 11 for 6 or less AD Home occupations AC #6 PARKS Parks, neighborhood P Parks, regional/community, existing P Parks, regional/community, new AD OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Community Facilities Religious institutions H Public Faciilrttes City government facilities H Other government offices and facilities H OFFICE AND CONFERENCE ATTACHMENT B Veterinary offices/clinics p RETAIL Eating and drinking establishments P #1 Horticultural nurseries H ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION Entertainment Cultural facilities H Recreation Golf courses (existing) P Golf courses (new) H SERVICES Services, General Bed and breakfast house, accessory AD Bed and breakfast house, professional H Day Care Services Adult day care I AC Family day care AC UTIUTIES Communications broadcast and relay towers H Utilities, small P Utilities, medium AD Utilities, large H WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Macro facility antennas AD M Micro facility antennas P Mini facility antennas P rM Minor modifications to existing wireless communication facilities P #49 Monopole I support structures H #4s GENERAL ACCESSORY USES Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC, where not otherwise listed in the Use Table AC TEMPORARY USE Sales/marketing trallers, on -site P 853 Temporary or manufactured buildings used for construction P #10 Temporary uses P #53 ATTACHMENT C 4-2-0708 RESIDENTIAL-1 DU/AC (114) Uses allowed in the R-1 Zone are as follows: USES: TYPE: AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES Agriculture P Natural resource extraction/recovery H ANIMALS AND RELATED USES Animal husbandry (20 or fewer small animals per acre) P #51 Animal husbandry (4 or fewer medium animals per acne) P #51 Animal husbandry (ma)imum of 1 large animal per acre) P #51 Greater number of animals than allowed above H #36 Beekeeping P #35 Kennels, hobby AC #37 Pets, common household, up to 3 per dwelling unit or business establishment AC Stables, commercial AD #37 RESIDENTIAL Detached dwelling P #19 Flats or townhouses, no greater than 2 units total per building (e)isting legal) P Manufactured Homes Manufactured homes, designated P #19 OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND HOME OCCUPATIONS Adult family home P Group homes 11 for 6 or less P Group homes 11 for 7 or more H Home occupations AC #6 Retirement residences H SCHOOLS K-12 educational institution (public or private) 1H #9 K-12 educational institution (public or private), existing IP #9 PARKS Parks, neighborhood P Parks, regional/community, existing P Parks, regional/community, new AD OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Community Facile ATTACHWNT C Cemetery H Religious institutions H Service and social organizations H Public Facilities City government offices AD City government facilities H Other government offices and facilities H RETAIL Eating and drinking establishments P #1 Horticultural nurseries H ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION Entertainment Cultural facilities H Recreation Golf courses (existing) p Golf courses (new) p Marinas p SERVICES Serviced General Bed and breakfast house, accessory AD Bed and breakfast house, professional AD Day Care Saviaes Adult day care I AC Family day care AC UTIUTIES Communications broadcast and relay towers H Utilities, small p Utilities, medium AD Utilities, large H WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Macro facility antennas AD #as Micro facility antennas p Mini facility antennas p #44 Minor modifications to existing wireless communication facilities P #aa Monopole I support structures H #as GENERAL ACCESSORY USES ATTACHMENT C Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC, where not otherwise listed in the Use Table AC TEMPORARY USE Model homes in an approved residential development: one model home on an existing lot P #W Salestmarketing trailers, on -site P#53 Temporary or manufactured buildings used for construction P #10 Temporary uses P #53 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 4-2, ZONING DISTRICTS — USES AND STANDARDS, CHAPTER 4-3, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AND CHAPTER 44, CITY-WIDE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY CHANGING THE PROVISIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL ZONE. WHEREAS, the City conducted review of the entire Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations of Ordinance 4260, performed analysis of needed revisions based on Growth Management Act compliance and developed a work program to implement needed updates of development regulations; and WHEREAS, the Residential Density Bonus District was eliminated within the Commercial Corridors; and WHEREAS, the prior Residential Density Bonus District provisions allowed attached residential units without a mix of commercial uses within the same building and platting of residential development greater than 150 feet from the primary arterial within the district; and WHEREAS, the City desires to re -instate the ability to plat attached unit developments within portions of the Commercial Corridor land use designation; and WHEREAS, the primary purpose of the NE 0, Sunset, and Puget Business Districts is to provide opportunity for a wide range of commercial uses, however residential uses are allowed as part of the mix of uses in the zone; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that revisions are needed to the Title IV Development Standards to reinstate stand-alone residential uses in a limited way, and to modify 1 ORDINANCE NO. procedures and review criteria for those uses to ensure that development is consistent with the purpose of the Commercial Arterial zone; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Section 4-2-020.L of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: L. COMAMRCIAL ARTERIAL ZONE (CA): The purpose of the Commercial Arterial Zone (CA) is to evolve from "strip commercial" linear business districts to business areas characterized by enhanced site planning, incorporating efficient parking lot design coordinated access, amenities and boulevard treatment. The CA Zone provides for a wide variety of indoor and outdoor retail sales and services along high - volume traffic corridors. Limited residential uses may be integrated into the zone if there are permanent physical connections to commercial uses. The zone includes four designated business districts along mapped corridors with development standards designed to encourage concentrated commercial activity, a focal point of pedestrian activity along the corridor, and visual interest. Designated business districts include: Automall, Sunset Boulevard, Northeast Fourth, and the Rainier Avenue. The CA zone is intended to implement the Commercial Corridor Comprehensive Plan designation. Interpretation of uses and project review in this zone shall be based on the objectives and policy direction established in the Commercial Corridor land use designation, Objectives LU- DDD through LU-UUU, Policies LU-333 through LU-405 or the Employment Area -Valley land is ORDINANCE NO. use designation, Objectives LU-ZZZ through LU-BBBB, Policies LU-445 through LU-460, and the Community Design Element of the Comprehensive Plan. SECTION IL Subsection C, Residential, of Section 4-2-060, Zoning Use Table — Uses Allowed in Zoning Designations, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment A. SECTION M. Section 4-2-070.I, Commercial Neighborhood, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment B. SECTION IV. Section 4-2-070.L, Commercial Arterial, of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment C. SECTION V. The Corridor Maps in Sections 4-2-080Y (NE 0 Corridor), 4-2- 080.G (Puget Corridor), 4-2-080.H (Rainier Corridor), and 4-2-080.I (Sunset Corridor) of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby deleted. SECTION VL Subsections 14, 18, 19, 20, 44, 46, 47, 48, 68, and 69, of Section 4- 2-080, "Conditions Associated with Zoning Use Tables" of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses ORDINANCE NO. and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as follows: 14. Except that when operations are predominantly conducted out-of-doors rather than completely enclosed within an enclosed structure, an administrative conditional use permit is required within the Sunset Business District, within the NE 4'h Business District, and within the Center Village designation. 18. a. General Requirements: Subject to the density limits of the development standards for this zone and only permitted within a structure containing retail and/or on -site service uses on the ground floor except in the Employment Area Valley or Commercial Business Districts, as described below. b. Employment Area Valley: Residential uses are not permitted in the Employment Area Valley (EAV) land use designation. See EAV Map in RMC 4-2-080.B. C. Commercial Business Districts: Townhouse units are allowed without ground floor retail within the building if located more than 150 ft. from an arterial in the NE 4' Business District, Sunset Business District, and Puget Business District with an administrative conditional use permit, subject to the criteria in 4-9-030K. Residential units developed as part of a same building mixed -use project are allowed at a maximum of 60 du/acre if the requirements for mixed use development in the Business District Overlay at 4-3-040 are met . 19. Subject to the density limitations located in the development standards for this zone. CN zone- Additional: only permitted within a structure containing retail and/or on -site service uses on the ground floor. 20. Not allowed in locations within the Sunset Business District, the NE 4'h Business District, and within the Puget Business District. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 44. Within the NE a Street Business District and within the Rainier Avenue Business District, permitted provided that the facility has a minimum setback of one hundred feet (100') from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel, otherwise an administrative conditional use permit is required. 46. Within the Sunset Boulevard Business District, eligible for an administrative conditional use permit provided that the facility has a minimum setback of one hundred feet (100') from any adjacent residentially zoned parcel, otherwise a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit is required. 47. Within the Rainier Avenue Business District, may be allowed by an administrative conditional use permit if the monopole R facility is to be constructed on property where wireless communication support structures presently operate, and the new monopole II facility will not exceed the height of the existing support structures. Prohibited if located within three hundred feet (300') of an RC, R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10, orR-14 Zone unless the Development Services Division determines that all residentially zoned property within three hundred feet (300') of the proposed facility is undevelopable due to critical areas regulations (RMC 4-3-050), then the new wireless support structure can be reviewed as an administrative conditional use. 48. Within the NE a Business District and within the Sunset Boulevard Business District prohibited if located within three hundred feet (300') of an RC, R-1, R-5, R 8, R 10, or R-14 Zone, otherwise may be allowed with a Hearing Examiner conditional use permit. 68. Within the NE 0 Business District, within the Sunset Business District and within the Puget Drive Business District, a. uses are subject to the size restrictions ofRMC 4-2-120.A, and I ORDINANCE NO. b. within Puget and Sunset Business District, department stores are not permitted. 69. Within the NE a Business District, within the Sunset Business District and within the Puget Drive Business District, uses are subject to the size restrictions of RMC 4-2- 120A: a. Within Sunset and Puget Business District, Only the following on -site services are permitted: Entertainment media rental, financial and real estate services; repair services (excluding auto repair). b. Rental services require an administrative conditional use permit. SECTION VIL The subsection "Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations" of Section 4-2-120.A of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment D. SECTION The subsections 2 and 16, of Section 4-2-120.C, "Conditions Associated with Development Standards for Commercial Zoning Designations", of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as shown on Attachment E. SECTION IX, The map in Section 4-3-040.H entitled "NE Sunset Boulevard Corridor Business District" of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General ORDINANCE NO. Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to be entitled "NE Sunset Business District." SECTION X. The map in Section 4-3-040.I entitled "NE e Street Corridor Business District" of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to be entitled "NE 4" Business District." SECTION XL The map entitled "Rainier Corridor Business District" at 4-3-040.J of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby renamed "Rainier Business District." SECTION XII. Sections 4-3-040.A - G, "Commercial Corridor Business Designations" of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as follows: A PURPOSE: These regulations establish development standards to implement the Commercial Corridor Comprehensive Plan designation and establish "business districts". These regulations guide the redevelopment of strip commercial urban forms into more concentrated urban forms, provide for design guidelines for residential development within the district, enhance the pedestrian environment, make the commercial environment more attractive, improve the City's tax base, and result in a more successful business district. B. APPLICABILITY: 1. Renton Automall District. 7 ORDINANCE NO. a. Automall Area A: That area bounded by Grady Way S. on the north, Rainier Avenue S. (SR-167) on the east, I405 on the south, and Seneca Avenue S. on the west; and That area bounded by S.W. Grady Way on the north, Raymond Avenue S.W. on the west, Seneca. Avenue S.W. on the east, and the alley midway between S.W. Grady and SW 12th Street, on the south. b. Automall Area B: That area along the south side of S.W. Grady defined by the alley between S.W. Grady Way and S.W. 12th Street on the north, Seneca Avenue S.W. on the east, Raymond Avenue S.W. on the west, and I-405 on the south; That area along the south side of S.W. Grady Way west of Raymond Avenue S. between S.W. Grady Way on the north, Raymond Avenue S. on the east, a north/south line approximately four hundred feet (4001) east of Raymond Avenue S.W. on the west, and I-405 on the south; That area along the north side of S.W. Grady Way west of Lind Avenue S. bounded by S.W. Grady Way on the south, Oakesdale Avenue S.W. on the west, S.W. loth Street on the north, and Lind Avenue S.W. on the east; That area along the north side of S.W. Grady Way between Lind Avenue to the west and Rainier Avenue S. on the east. Beginning at a point approximately four hundred feet (400) north Of S.W. Grady Way along the east side of Lind Avenue S.W. on the west, then east for a distance of approximately three hundred twenty five feet (325), then south to a point approximately one hundred eighty feet (180) north of S.W. Grady Way, then east from this point parallel to S.W. Grady Way to a point approximately ninety feet (90) west of Rainier Avenue S., then north from this point approximately sixty feet (60), then west approximately fifty feet (50), and then north 8 ORDINANCE NO. approximately two hundred fifteen feet (215) and then east approximately one hundred sixty feet (160) to Rainier Avenue S. on the east; That area north of South 7th Street and west of Hardie Avenue generally described as the area beginning at the northwest corner of South 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S. and then Proceeding west approximately four hundred twenty five feet (425), then north approximately four hundred fifty feet (450') to the southern edge of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of- way, then east along the railroad right-of-way approximately two hundred thirty five feet (235') to Hardie Avenue and then south along Hardie Avenue to the beginning point; That area north of South 7th Street between Hardie Avenue on the west, the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way on the north, and Rainier Avenue on the east; That area north of South 7th Street between Rainier Avenue S. on the west, a line approximately one hundred ninety feet (190) north of and parallel to South 7th Street on the north, and Shattuck Avenue S. on the east; The triangular area on the south side of South 7th Street between Hardie Avenue on the west and Rainier Avenue on the east; The larger area north of S. Grady Way between Rainier Avenue on the west and Shattuck Avenue S. on the east between South 7th Street on the north and S. Grady Way on the south; That area north of S. Grady Way between Shattuck Avenue S. on the west, the northern edge of the former railroad right-of-way approximately one hundred fifty feet (150') north of S. Grady Way, and Talbot Road/Smithem Avenue S. on the east; That area along the south side of S. Grady Way between SR-167/Ra.inier Avenue S. on the west and a north/south line approximately one thousand six hundred thirty feet (1,630') east of SR-167 on the east, S. Grady Way on the north, and on the southwest along S. Renton Village E ORDINANCE NO. Place approximately one hundred seventy five feet (175) to the 1998 zoning boundary between the CA Zone and the CO Zone on the south; and That area along the south side of S. Grady Way east of Talbot Road bounded by Talbot Road on the west, S. Grady Way on the northwest, Renton City Hall on the north/northeast, Benson Road S. on the eaWsoutheast, and the I405 right-of-way on the south. 2. N.E. Sunset Boulevard Business District: That area (RMC 4-3-040H) along NE Sunset Blvd. from east of Duvall Ave. NE to west of Union Ave. NE. 3. Northeast Fourth Business District: That area (RMC 4-3-040I) west of Monroe Ave NE and extending to Field Ave NE on the east. 4. Rainer Ave. Business District: The area (RMC 4-3-040n north of South 2nd Street on the north and the Houser railroad trestle on the south to the Renton Automall District. 5. Puget Business District: The area (RMC 4-3-040K) south of the 405 overpass between South Puget Drive and Benson Road South, and an area east of Benson Road South near Eagle Ridge Drive, and an area east of Benson Road South and north of Puget Drive. C. USES PERMITTED IN THE RENTON AUTOMALL U"ROVEMENT DISTRICT: The following use provisions take precedence over the underlying zoning: 10 ORDINANCE NO. USES ALLOWED IN AREA A USES ALLOWED Only the following uses are permitted within IN AREA B Automall Area A Within the CA Zone: Auto, motorcycle, snowmobile, lawn and garden equipment, and passenger truck sales; Secondary uses including: Licensing bureaus, car rentals, public parking, and other uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to directly support dealerships; Within the IM Zone: Auto, motorcycle, snowmobile, lawn and garden equipment, passenger truck sales, and existing office; Secondary uses including: Licensing bureaus, car rentals, public parking, off -site parking consistent with RMC 4-4-080E2 and other uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to directly support dealerships. All uses permitted by the underlying zoning D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR USES LOCATED WITHIN THE RENTON AUTOMALL - AREAS A AND B: All permitted uses in Area A and all auto sales and related uses in Area B of the Renton Automall shall comply with the following development standards: ALL USES IN AREA A, NON -DEALERSHIPS DEALERSHIPS AND AND RELATED USES IN RELATED USES IN AREA B AREA B SERVICE AREA Service areas shall not face Service areas shall not face ORIENTATION public street frontage. public street frontage. LANDSCAPING - A 15-foot-wide landscape Pursuant to landscaping STREET strip along these street requirements listed in FRONTAGE frontages. This frontage chapter 4-2 RMC LANDSCAPING requirement is in lieu of the (requirements for the REQUIREMENTS frontage requirement listed underlying zone) and RMC for lots which abut for the zone in chapter 4-2 44-070. Lind Avenue S.W., RMC. S.W. Grady Way, Unimproved portions of the Talbot Road S. (SR- right-of-way may be used in 515) and Rainier combination with abutting Avenue S. private property to meet the riwillired 15-foot landscape 11 ORDINANCE NO. strip width. The landscaping shall include a minimum 30-inch- high berm and red maples (Ater rubrum) planted 25 feet on center. LANDSCAPING - N inimum 2.5% of the gross Pursuant to landscaping MINIMUM site area shall be provided requirements listed in AMOUNT AND as on -site landscaping. chapter 4-2 RMC LOCATION Landscaping shall be (requirements for the consolidated and located at underlying zone) and RMC site entries, building fronts, 44-070. or other visually prominent locations as approved through the site plan development review rocess. WHEEL STOPS If frontage landscaping is If frontage landscaping is relocated, then permanent relocated, then permanent wheel stops or continuous wheel stops or continuous curbs must be installed a curbs must be installed a minimum of 2.5 feet from minimum of 2.5 feet from sidewalks to prevent sidewalks to prevent bumper overhang of bumper overhang of sidewalks. Where these sidewalks. Where these requirements differ from the requirements differ from the requirements of the parking, requirements of the parking, loading and driveway loading and driveway regulations of chapter 4-4 regulations of chapter 44 RMC, these requirements RMC, these requirements shall govern. shall govern. CUSTOMER Customer parking shall be Customer parking shall be PARKING designated and striped near designated and striped near entry drives and visible entry drives and visible from public streets. Where from public streets. Where possible, customer parking possible, customer parking shall be combined with shall be combined with adjacent dealership adjacent dealership customer parking and customer parking and shared access. Where these shared access. Where these requirements differ from the requirements differ from the requirements of the parking, requirements of the parking, loading and driveway loading and driveway regulations of chapter 44 regulations of chapter 44 RMC, these requirements RMC, these requirements shall overn. shall eovern. 12 ORDINANCE NO. AUTOMALL Once completed, all Once completed, all RIGHT-OF-WAY development shall development shall IMPROVEMENT coordinate with a right -of- coordinate with a right -of - PLAN way improvement plan. A way improvement plan. A COORDINATION right-of-way improvement right-of-way improvement plan shall be completed by plan shall be completed by the City in coordination the City in coordination with adjacent property with adjacent property owners, and shall address owners, and shall address gateways, signage, gateways, signage, landscaping, and shared landscaping, and shared ss. access. AUTOMALL FAIIevelopment shall All development shall BIPROVEMENT dinate with the coordinate with the PLAN Automall Improvement. Plan Automall Improvement Plan COMPLIANCE adopted by Resolution No. adopted by Resolution No. 3182. The plan addresses 3182. The plan addresses potential street vacations, potential street vacations, right-of-way improvements, right-of-way improvements, area gateways, signage, area gateways, signage, landscaping, circulation, landscaping, circulation, and shared access. and shared access. MODIFICATIONS Where full compliance with these provisions would create a hardship for existing uses undergoing major modifications, the Zoning Administrator may modify them. Hardship for existing uses may result from existing lot coverage, existing siting of buildings, etc., which preclude full compliance. E. POTENTIAL WAIVER OF STREET VACATION FEES FOR DEALERSHIPS LOCATED WITHIN THE RENTON AUTOMALL AREA A: All street vacation fees and compensation for the right-of-way may be waived by the Council for developing properties in Area A, provided: 13 ORDINANCE NO. The properties are designated to be vacated on the Automall Improvement Plan Map, 2. The application for street vacation conforms to RMC 9-14-10, Administrative Procedure for Right -of -Way Vacations, and 3. The uses proposed conform to subsection C of this Section. F. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR USES LOCATED WITHIN THE SUNSET BOULEVARD, NORTHEAST FOURTH STREET, PUGET, AND RAINIER AVENUE BUSINESS DISTRICTS. 1. Northeast Fourth, Sunset, and Puget Business Districts: a. Maximum Front Yard Setback: Maximum front setback of 15 feet from the property line. In the NE Fourth Business District, the 15 ft. setback may be modified to accommodate the Boulevard Improvement Plan. When the 15 foot setback is modified, a 15 foot landscaped buffer shall be required within the enlarged setback. Required parking shall not be located within a modified setback. 14 ORDINANCE NO. b. Public Plazas: Provision of a public plaza of no less than 1,000 sq. ft. with a minimum dimension of 20 feet on one side abutting the sidewalk at all arterial intersections in the business district. In the NE e Business District, this includes any intersection with NE 4's. In the Sunset Business District, this includes any intersection with Sunset Boulevard. In the Puget Business District, this includes the intersection of Benson Rd and Puget Drive. . A landscape plan consistent with RMC 4-4-070 shall be required for the public plaza, showing at a minimum, street trees, decorative paving, pedestrian scaled lighting, and seating. c. Future Commercial Development Pads: For parcels that are not fully developed, designate appropriate areas for future pad development to occur in later phases. d. Parking: The maximum number of parking spaces provided for uses within the corridor designation is limited to the minimum requirement in section 4-4-080F 10 Number of Required Parking Spaces. Garage structures shall not open directly onto a principal arterial or street. Parking lots shall be oriented to minimize their visual impact on the site. No more than 6 stalls may be consecutively clustered without an intervening landscaped area a minimum of 5 ft. in width and the length of the stall. e. Pedestrian Connections: i. Location of Pedestrian Connections (1) A minimum of one pedestrian connection shall be provided to connect the entry or entries of each detached building to the street in addition to sidewalks required in Section 4-6-060F. 15 ORDINANCE NO. (2) A minimum of one pedestrian connection shall be provided from each parking field located on the back and/or side of a building to the entry or entries. (3) A minimum of one pedestrian connection shall be provided from each side of a property or development abutting or adjacent to commercial and/or residential uses. (4) Space for the minimum required pedestrian connections above shall be reserved for future pad development and when the proposed development is abutting or adjacent to an unused parcel. ii. Design Standard for Internal Pedestrian Connections (1) Pedestrian connections shall be ADA accessible and a minimum of 5 ft. in width. (2) At least one of the following materials shall be used to define the walkway: pavers, changes in texture, or changes in the composition of the paving. (3) The entry and exit of the walkway shall be defined with a trellis, special railing, bollards, or other architectural features, as approved by the Reviewing Official. (4) Planting strips required in 4-6-060F shall be located between the road and the required sidewalk. Trees, shrubs, groundcovers, and perennial planting are required components of landscaping. Landscaping is subject to the requirements of RMC 44-070. 16 ORDINANCE NO. (5) Bollards or other decorative features may be provided at the pedestrian access points between commercial and residential uses. Chains across vehicular or pedestrian access points are prohibited. f. Additional Standards for Stand Alone Residential Uses: Site design shall include design elements that support a quality mixed use business district. The following minimum standards shall be met, however, the Reviewing Official may require additional elements consistent with site plan review criteria when determined necessary to integrate commercial and residential uses within this district. i. Street Grid: The project shall use a modified street grid system where residential buildings are oriented to a street. A public street grid system within the project shall be provided. No cul-de sacs allowed. Hammerhead turnarounds may only be used if the ends are able to accommodate future connection as part of the modified street grid system. Emergency fire access shall be provided through public streets or private easements connecting to the adjacent commercial or residential area. ii. Site design: Each unit shall address the public street, private street, or court with a private residential entry on the front facade of the structure designed to provide individual ground floor connection to the outside. iii. Residential Building Size: A maximum of 4 consecutively attached units shall be allowed. 17 ORDINANCE NO. iv. Minimum Land Area: A minimum of 1,200 sq.ft. of land area per dwelling unit is required. Each dwelling shall have a ground related private useable outdoor space of at least 200 sq. ft. with a minimum dimension of 10 ft. v. Building Design Standards: Urban Center Design Guidelines District B standards shall be required. Distinctive building design shall be provided with a superior level of quality for materials, details, and window placement. A consistent visual identity shall be applied to all sides of building that can be seen by the general public. Buildings should integrate pitched roofs, dormer windows, etc. to illustrate residential massing. Variation of modulation of vertical and horizontal facades of a minimum of 6 ft. depth and 20 ft. length is required at a minimum of a 40 ft., interval to reduce overall bulk and add interest and quality. Facades may be articulated with bays, terraces, balconies, awnings, stoops, recessed openings, etc. Large "boxes" without articulation are not allowed. No parapet or roofline shall exceed V2 the length of the building facade without a change in elevation. Building entries should be the most prominent feature of the facade, emphasized through the use of materials and architectural detail such as tower, projections, varied roofs, trellis work, pergolas, or covered entryways. vi. Walling and Fencing: Any walling or fencing shall use materials used in the architectural treatment of the dwellings_ In addition, where fencing occurs between residential and commercial uses, a minimum of one 18 ORDINANCE NO. pedestrian access point shall be required consistent with the standards above. vii. Additional Residential Parking Standards: parking must be within an enclosed structure located to the rear of the primary structure or in a detached garage with rear access. If this absolutely cannot be accomplished due to physical constraints of the site, then garages shall be designed to have minimum impact on streetscape appearance and function through the use of shared drives, architectural detailing, or facade design. The required guest spaces for attached residential uses may be surface parking. g. Additional Standards for Mixed Use (within the same building) Commercial and Residential Uses: Site design shall include design elements that support a quality mixed use business district. The following minimum standards shall be met, however, the Reviewing Official may require additional elements consistent with site plan review criteria when determined necessary to integrate commercial and residential uses within this district. i. Access: Hammerhead turnarounds may only be used if the ends are able to accommodate future connection as part of a modified street grid system. Emergency fire access shall be provided through public streets or private easements connecting to the adjacent commercial or residential area. ii. Site design: Commercial space must be reserved on the ground floor of all mixed used buildings, at a minimum depth of 34 ft. along the street ORDINANCE NO. frontage on the ground floor in the NE 4d', Sunset, and Puget Business District Overlay. Residential uses shall not be located in the ground floor commercial space, except for a residential entry feature linking the residential portion of the development to the street. iii. Building Design Standards: Urban Center Design Guidelines District B standards shall be required. Distinctive building design shall be provided with a superior level of quality for materials, details, and window placement. A consistent visual identity shall be applied to all sides of building that can be seen by the general public. Variation of modulation of vertical and horizontal facades of a minimum of 6 ft. depth and 20 ft. length is required at a minimum of a 40 ft., interval to reduce overall bulk and add interest and quality. Facades may be articulated with bays, terraces, balconies, awnings, stoops, recessed openings, etc. Large "boxes" without articulation are not allowed. No parapet or roofline shall exceed Y2 the length of the building facade without a change in elevation. Building entries should be the most prominent feature of the favade, emphasized through the use of materials and architectural detail such as tower, projections, varied roofs, trellis work, pergolas, or covered entryways. iv. Additional Mixed Use Parking Standards: parking must be within an enclosed structure located under the residential portion of the building. The required guest spaces for residential uses may be surface parking. ?n ORDINANCE NO. 2. Rainier Avenue Business District SECTION XIIL Sections 4-3-040.H and I, maps of NE Sunset Business District and NE 0 Business District, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as shown on Exhibit F. SECTION XIV. The map of Section 4-3-040.1 of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington' is hereby amended by renaming the map as "RAINIER BUSINESS DISTRICT." SECTION XV. A new Section, 4-3-040.K, map of Puget Business District, of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington' is hereby amended by reading as shown on Exhibit G. SECTION XVL Sections 4-9-030.K — P of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended as follows: ORDINANCE NO. K. SPECIAL DECISION CRITERIA FOR STAND ALONE RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE NE 4', SUNSET, OR PUGET BUSINESS DISTRICTS 1. Stand alone residential use may not be located within 150 ft. of an adjacent or abutting arterial street. This includes Sunset Boulevard, Duval Avenue, Anacortes Avenue, or Union Avenue in the Sunset Business District; NE 4t' Street, Union Avenue, or Duvall in the NE 4°i Street Business District; and Puget Drive or South Benson Road in the Puget Drive Business District- as shown on the Business District Maps in Section 4-30-040. 2. A mix of commercial, service, and residential uses exist within a 150 ft. radius of the proposed residential use. 3. Commercial use of the property is not feasible for reasons including, but not limited to: lack of commercial frontage, lack of access, critical areas and/or critical area buffers, or property configuration. 4. Residential use will augment the primary purpose of the commercial arterial zone by adding a pedestrian oriented land use that provides a physical connection between residential and commercial uses. 5. The use provides a transition between commercial and lower density Residential-10 and Residential-9 zoned areas and provides a visual, pedestrian, and vehicular connection from the residential zoned areas to the Commercial Arterial zoned areas. 6. Development standards from section 4-3-04OF are met unless the applicant opts for a Planned Urban Development, subject to section 4-9-150. Pedestrian connection standards from this section must be met without modification. L. DECISION AND CONDITIONS: 91) ORDINANCE NO. The governing authority may grant, with or without conditions, or deny the requested conditional use permit. The Zoning Administrator or Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant the conditional use permit upon making a determination, in writing, that the use is consistent with subsection G of this Section, Decision Criteria. The Zoning Administrator or Hearing Examiner may limit the term and duration of the conditional use permit. Conditions imposed by the Zoning Administrator or Hearing Examiner shall reasonably assure that nuisance or hazard to life or property will not develop. M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO BE COMBINED WITH SITE PLAN REVIEW: Where a use or development requires review under RMC 4-9-200, Site Plan Review, the site plan review and administrative conditional use permit shall be combined. N. FINALIZATION: (Reserved) O. EXPIRATION AND EXTENSION: See RMC 4-8- I OOH and I. P. MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED PLAN: (Reserved) SECTION XVII. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 22005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 11 ORDINANCE NO. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1220:11/22/05:ma 24 ATTACHMENT VA ATTACHMENT A 4-2.080 ZONING USE TABLE — USES ALLOWED IN ZONING DESIGNATIONS RC I R-1 I R4 R-tt RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM �� v••�Ry CESK3NATION3 - ••ry w GA CD CO COR UCN-1 UCN-2 P19 or townhouses, no greater than 2 P P i Ir P tots Per hgding (exlft P P ATTACHMENT ATTACHMENT B 4-2-0701 COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD (CN) K-12 educational institution (public H or private) K-12 educational institution (public P ss or private), e)dsting PARKS Parks, neighborhood P Parks, regionaUcommunity, eAsting P Parks, regional/community, new AD OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Cw mx* FaaeiW Cemetery H Religious institutions H Service and social organizations H PaW Fad0w City govemment offices AD City govemment facilities H USES: TYPE: OFFICE AND CONFERENCE Medical and dental office 1AD Uses allowed in the CN Zone are as follows: Offices, general AD 1#17 RETAIL Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC Eating and drinking establishments P #22 Horticultural nurseries H Retail sales P #s0 ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION EnAwfthment Cultural facilities AD SERVICES Servk es, G&7a a✓ Bed and breakfast house, accessory AD Bed and breakfast house, professional AD On -site services :MJ31 Drive4n/drive-through service Ac Day Cave Saidvw dult day care I P #rl Adult day cane II P #22 Day care centers P #22 Family day care AC Heal&X" SErmtes Medical institutions H VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES Car washes AD #2 Vehicle fueling stations AD #110 Vehicle service and repair, small AD #2 STORAGE Indoor storage Ac 1k11 ATTACHMENT B INDUSTRIAL Solid Wa %e�yraGvrp IP Recycling collection station UTILITIES mmunications broadcast and relay rtowers H Electrical power generation and H cogeneration #66 Utilities, small P Utilities, medium AD Utilities, large H WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Lattice towers support structures H Macro facility antennas P 944 Micro facility antennas P Mini facility antennas P Minor modifications to e)asting P m.VIc00 w11n1w11R'fUU11 Iduffues I support structures 11 support structures GENERAL ACCESSORY USES Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-050 and as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC, where not otherwise listed in AC the Use Table 11 TEMPORARY USE Model homes in an approved residential development: one P model home on an eAsting lot ' IlSalesJmarketing trailers, on -site I:__ II IlTemporary or manufactured buildings1#10 P II used for construction uses (Ord. 4773, 3-22-1999; Ord. 4786, 7-12- 1999; Ord. 4803, 10-25-1999; Amd. Ord. Ord. 5100, 11-1-2004) 2 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT C 4-2-070L COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL (CA) Uses allowed in the CA Zone are as follows: AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES Natural resource extraction/recovery 1H ANIMALS AND RELATED USES Kennels, hobby AC #37 Pets, common household, up to 3 per dwelling unit or business establishment 1AC Semi -attached dwelling AD #18 Attached dwelling R-AD #18 Flats or townhouses (e)isting legal) OTHER RESIDENTIAL, LODGING AND HOME OCCUPATIONS Group homes I H Group homes I I for 7 or more H Home occupations AC #s K-12 educational institution (public or private) H #8 K-12 educational institution (public or private), exsting P #s Other higher education institution P Schools/studios, arts and crafts P Trade or vocational school H Parks, neighborhood P Parks, regional/community, existing P Parks, regional/community, new AD OTHER COMMUNITY AND PUBLIC FACILITIES CamxaW FaCAf&s Cemetery H Religious institutions H Service and social organizations H PUD& FacAtigs USES: TYPE: City government offices AD City government facilities H Other government offices and facilities H OFFICE AND CONFERENCE 1 ATTACHMENT C Conference center P #38 Medical and dental offices P Offices, general P Veterinary of oes/dinics P RETAIL Adult retail use P #43 Big -box retail P #72 Drive-in/drive-through, retail AC Eating and drinking establishments P Horticultural nurseries H Retail sales P #ss Retail sales, outdoor P #15 Taverns P #20 Vehicle sales, large P #41 Vehicle sales, small P #20 ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATION Ent Adult entertainment business P#43 Card room P #52 Cultural facilities AD Dance clubs P #20 Dance halls P #20 Gaming/gambling facilities, not -for -profit H#20 Movie theaters P #20 Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition halls, indoor P #20 Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition halls, outdoor AD #20 Reavation Recreation facilities, indoor IP Recreation facilities, outdoor H #20 SERVICES Serwbw, Geneva/ Hotel P #20 Motel P #20 Off -site services P #38 On -site services P #es Drive-in/drive-through service AC Vehicle rental, small P #20 VayC&v Smvkw Adult day care I P #22 Adult day care 11 P #22 Day Care Centers P #22 ATTACHMENT C Family day care AC hlealftem Sery fo.-S Convalescent centers H Medical institutions H VEHICLE RELATED ACTIVITIES Body shops H #31 Car washes P #22 Express transportation services AD #20 0 Parking garage, structured, commercial or public P 20 #20 Parking, surface, commercial or public P Park and ride, shared -use P #109 Park and ride, dedicated P #105 Transit centers H2O Vehicle fueling stations P Vehicle service and repair, small P Air Tmtmpa1Ww uses Helipads, accessory to primary use H #20 STORAGE Indoor storage JAC �Y11 ATTACHMENT C Utilities, large H WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES Lattice towers support structures AD #47 Macro facility antennas P #44 Micro facility antennas P Mini facility antennas P #44 Minor modifications to existing wireless communication facilities P #49 Monopole I support structures P #44 Monopole 11 support structures AD #47 GENERAL ACCESSORY USES Accessory uses per RMC 4-2-030 and as defined in chapter=11 RMC, where not otherwise listed in the Use Table AC TEMPORARY USE Model homes in an approved residential development: one model home on an existing lot P #53 Salestmarketing trailers, on -site p #53 Temporary or manufactured buildings used for construction P #lo Temporary uses P # 4 ATTACHMENT Ic ATTACHWNT D 4-2-120A DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS CN CV CA LOT DIMENSIONS None, except: 1,200 sq. ft. in the Sunset, NE Fourth, Minimum Lot Size for lots 5,000 sq. ft. 25,000 sq. ft. and Puget Business created after Nov. 10, 2004 Districts. See maps in RMC 4-3-040 Minimum Lot Width/Depth for lots None None None created afterNov. 10, 2004 LOT COVERAGE 65% of total lot area 65% of total lot area or 75% if parking is or 75% if panting is or of total lot area5% Maximum Lot Coverage provided within the provided within the 75% 7if parking is provided for Buildings building or within an building or within an within the building or on -site parking on -site parting within an on -site parking garage. garage. garage. DENSITY (Net Density in Dwelling Units per Net Acre) Net Residential 10 dwelling units net acre. None, except in the Sunset, NE Fourth, and Puget Business Districts. See maps in RMC 4-3-04 : 10 dwelling units per net (DENSITY (Net Density in Dwelling Units per Net Acre) (Continued) Net ResidentialJ4 dwelling units per dwelling units net acre. Center Village Residential Bonus Pursuant to RMC 4- 3-095, up to 80 dwelling units per net acre may be granted for provision of: A minimum depth of 30 ft. and a minimum length of 60 ft. of commercial use on the first floor 20 dwelling units per net acre, except within the . Sunset, NE Fourth, and Puget Business Districts, it shall be 60 dwelling units per acre for development Nith mixed commercial and residential use in the ;ame building. See maps n RMC 4-3-040 ATTACHMENT D the primary ructure, and T king enclosed der or enclosed within the first floor of the primary stricture. SETBACKS 10 ft. The minimum 10 ft. The minimum setback may be setback may be 10 ft. The minimum reduced to 0 ft. reduced to 0 ft.� may be reduced through the site plan through the site plan to 0 ft. through the site Minimum Front Yard18 development review development review plan development review process provided process provided process provided blank blank walls are not blank walls are not wails are not located located within the located within the within the reduced reduced setback. reduced setback. setback. None, except 15 ft. in the Rainier Avenue, Sunset, Maximum Front Yard18 15 ft.15 15 ft.15 NE Fourth, and Puget Business Districts. See maps and standards in in RMC 4-3-040. The minimum 10 ft. The minimum ck may be setback may be 10 ft. The minimum d to 0 ft. reduced to 0 ft. setback may be reduced h the site plan through the site plan to 0 ft. through the site Minimum Side Yardopment review development review Plan development review Along a Streetl8ss provided lb p provided process provided blank walls are not blank wails are not walls are not located d within the located within the within the reduced ed setback. reduced setback. setback. Minimum Freewayfrom andscaped the 10 ft. landscaped setback from the10ft. landscaped setback Frontage Setbackty line. from the property fine. Property line. SETBACKS (Continued) None, except 15 ft. None, except 15 ft. if lot abuts or is if lot abuts or is None, except 15 ft. if lot adjacent to a adjacent to a abuts or is adjacent to a Minimum Rear Yard18 residential zone, residential zone, residential zone, RC, R-1, RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, R-4, R-8, R-10, R-14, or R-10, R-14, or RM- R-10, R-14, or RM- RM-F. F. F. None, except 15 ft. None, except 15 ft. None, except 15 ft, if lot Minimum Side YaM18 If lot abuts or is if lot abuts or is abuts or is adjacent to a adjacent to a adjacent to a residential zone, RC, R-1, residential zone, residential zone, R-4, R-8, R-10, R-14, or ATTACHMENT D RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, RM-F. R-10, R-14, or RM- R-10, R-14, or RM- F• F. [ClWearVisionArea In no case shall a In no case shall a In no case shall a structure over 42 in. in height intrude into structure over 42 in. in height intrude into structure over 42 in. in the 20 ft. dear the 20 ft. dear height intrude into the 20 vision area defined vision area defined ft. dear vision area in RMC 4-11-030. lin RMC 4-11-030. defined in RMC 4-11-030. BUILDING LIMITATIONS None, except: 5,000 gross sq. ft. a. In the NE Fourth The maximum size Business District: shall not be 65,000 gross sq. ft. Maximum Gross Floor exceeded except by b. In the Puget Sunset and Area of Any Single conditional use None Business Districts:, Commercial Use on a peffnk.2,9 These 35,000 sq. ft. Site restrictions do not apply to residential Restrictions do not apply uses subject to net to uses subject to net density limitations. density limitations and grocery stores (see maps In RMC 4-3-040). None, except: a.. In the NE Fourth 3,000 gross sq. ft.21 Business District: The The maximum size 65,000 gross sq. ft. shall not be b. In the Puget Sunset and exceeded except by Business Districts:, 35,000 sq. ft. Maximum Gross Floor conditional use The total gross square Area of Any Single Office permit. ' These None footage of these uses Use on a Site2, 9 do not shall not exceed 50% of apply to residential the gross square footage of the site.2,9 uses, which are These restrictions do not subject to net apply to residential uses, density limitations. which are subject to net density limitations. (See maps in RMC 4-3-040.) All commercial uses shall have their primary entrance _ See RMC 4-3-040 for Building Orientation and shop display NA standards for the Puget, window oriented Sunset and NE Fourth toward the street Business Districts. frontage. LANDSCAPING ATTACHMENT D Minimum on -site Landscape Width Required Along the Street Frontage Minimum On -site Landscape Width Along the Street Frontage Required When a Commercial lot is Adjacent8 to Property Zoned Residential, RC, R4, R-4, R-8, R-10, R-14, or RM Minimum Landscape Width Required When a Commercial Lot is Abutting? to Property Zoned Residential, RC, R4, R-4, R-8, R40, R44, or RIM 10 ft., except where 10 ft., except where reduced through the reduced through the site plan site plan development review development review process. process. ft. wide sight - landscape strip.3,5 If the street is a designated principal arterial,l non -sight - obscuring landscaping shall be provided unless otherwise determined by the Reviewing Official through the site plan) levelopment review 15 ft. wide landscaped visual barrier consistent with the definition in RMC 4-11-120. A 10 ft. sight- randscape strip may be allowed through the site plan development review process.3,4 15 ft. wide landscape buffer is required3 unless otherwise led by the ng Official the site plan merit review 15 ft. wide landscaped visual barrier consistent with the definition in RMC 4-11-120. A 10 ft. sight - !landscape strip may be allowed through the site plan development review process.3,4 10 ft., except where reduced through the site plan development review process. There are additional landscaping standards for pedestrian connections in the Puget, Sunset, and NE Fourth Business Districts. See maps and standards at RMC 4-3- 15 ft. wide sight -obscuring landscape strip.3,5 If the sheet is a designated principal arterial,1 non -sight - obscuring landscaping shall be provided unless otherwise determined by the Reviewing Official through the site plan development review process. There are additional landscaping standards for pedestrian connections in the Puget, Sunset, and NE Fourth Business Districts. See maps and standards at RMC 4-3- 15 ft. wide landscaped visual barrier consistent with the definitions in RM{ 4-11-120. A 10 ft. sight- Dbscuring landscape strip may be allowed through the site plan development 'eview process. There ire additional dscaping standards pedestrian mections in the let, Sunset, and NE irth Business Acts. See maps and idards at RMC 4-3- ,..3,4 4 ATTACHMIENT D it Requirements for rties Located the Green River Planning Area Maximum Building Height,14,16 except for Public uses with a `Public Suffix' (P) designation20 135 ft. In no case shall height exceed the limits specified in RMC 4-3-020. In the Green River Valley, an additional 2% of natural landscaping shall be required per the Soil Conservation Service Environmental Mitigation Agreement. These areas should not be dispersed throughout a site, but should be aggregated in one portion of the property. Where possible, the required 2% landscaping for adjacent properties should be contiguous. A drainage NA swale, planted with vegetation suitable for habitat, may be counted toward the 2% additional landscape requirement if the Reviewing Official determines that the proposed planting plan and Swale design will function to meet the intent of these regulations, including but not limited to, that the facility slope and fencing design would not inhibit wildlife use. See RMC 4-4-070D6, Green River Valley Landscaping 50 ft., except 35 ft. for residential use only buildings in the Sunset and NE Fourth Business 50 ft. except when Districts. See maps in abutting lots zoned RMC 4-3-040. R-8, RMH, R-10, R- Heights may exceed the 14, or RM-F, then maximum height with a 45 ft. Conditional Use Permit.16 In no case shall height exceed the limits specified in RMC 4-3-020. Imaielesximu ComHghtmunication ISee RMC 4-4-140G.ISee RMC 4-4-140G.ISee RMC 4-4-140G. I 5 ATTACHMENT D Facilities SCREENING Outdoor, Loading, Repair, Maintenance, Work, or Storage Areas; Surface -Mounted Utility and Mechanical See RMC 4-4-095. See RMC 4-4-095. See RMC 4-4-095. Equipment; Roof Top Equipment (Except for Telecommunication Equipment) Refuse or Recyclables See RMC 4-4-090. See RMC 4-4-090. ISee RMC 4-4-090. PARKING See RMC 10-10-13 and RMC 4-4-080. For the NE General See RMC 10-10-13 See RMC 10-10-13 Fourth, Sunset, Puget, and RMC 4-4-080. and RMC 4-4-080. and Rainier Avenue Business Districts, see RMC 4-3-040. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS pedestrian connection A pedestrian A pedestrian shall be provided from apublic connection shall be connection shall be entrance to the Provided from a provided from a street, in order provide Public entrance to public entrance to direct, dear and separate the street, in order the street, in order pedestrian walks from to provide direct, to provide direct, sidewalks to building General Gear and separate clear and separate entries and internally from pedestrian walks tied pedestrian walks buildings to abutting retail from sidewalks to from sidewalks to properties. There are building entries and building entries and additional standards for internally from internally from the Rainier Avenue, NE buildings to abutting buildings to abutting Fourth, Sunset, and Puget retail properties, retail properties. Business Districts. See RMC 4-3-040 for maps and standards. SIGNS See RMC 4-4-100. There are additional standards General See RMC 4-4-100. See RMC 4-4-100. for the Rainier Avenue Business District at RMC 4-3-040. LOADING DOCKS See RMC 4-4-080. See RMC 4-4-080. See RMC 4-4-080. Location within Site Shall not be Shall not be Shall not be permitted on permitted on the permitted on the the side of the lot adjacent side of the lot side of the lot to or abutting a residential ATTACHMENT D adjacent to or adjacent to or zone, RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, abutting a abutting a R-10, R-14, or RM.3 residential zone, residential zone, RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, RC, R-1, R-4, R-8, R-10, R-14, or RM.3 PSRe.itse R-10, R-14, or RM.3 R/RECYCLING COLLECTION AREA ation of cycling SeeRMC4-4-090. SeeRMC4-4-090. SeeRMC4-4-090. CRITICAL AREAS General See RMC 4-3-050. See RMC 4-3-050. See RMC 4-3-050. ATTACHMENT E ATTACHMENT E 4-2-120C CONDITIONS ASSOCIATED WITH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLES FOR COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS 2. The following table indicates the maximum requested size/standard change that may be allowed by conditional use permit. Increases above these levels may not be achieved by a variance or the conditional use permit process. APPLICABLE ZONE STANDARD CHANGE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST PERNIIT TYPE Uses restricted to 3,000 gross CN s.f. —increases: H Between 3,000 — 5,000 s.f. max. Uses restricted to 5,000 gross s.f. —increases up to: AD CN 10% or 500 gross s.f. 120% or 1,000 gross s.f. H Uses restricted to 35,000 Puget and Sunset Business gross s.f. — increases up to: AD Districts in the CA Zone 20% or 7,000 gross s.f. 401/o or 14,000 gross s.f. H NE 4th Business District in Uses restricted to 65,000 gross s.f. —increases up to: CA and CV Zone AD 20% or 13,000 gross s.f. 140*/* or 26,000 gross s.f. H H = Hearing Examiner Conditional Use AD = Administrative Conditional Use ATTACHMENT E 16. The following height requests may be made: APPLICABLE ZONE HEIGHT CHANGE CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST PERMIT TYPE Puget and Sunset Business Exceed height by less than 20 Districts in the CA Zone feet AD Exceed height of 50 feet AD CV and NE 4th Business Exceed height of 45 feet District in CA Zone when abutting R-8 or R-10 H Zone CA Exceed height of 50 feet H rH = Hearing Examiner AD = Administrative Conditional Use In consideration of a request for conditional use permit for additional building height the Reviewing Official shall consider the following factors in addition to the criteria in RMC 4-9-030, Conditional Use Permits, among all other relevant information. a. Location Criteria: Proximity of arterial streets which have sufficient capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the development. Developments are encouraged to locate in areas served by transit. b. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations and any other plan, program, map or regulation of the City. C. Effect on Adjacent Properties: Building heights shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. When a building in excess of the maximum height is proposed adjacent to or abuts a lot designated R-1, R4, It-8, R- 10, R-14 or RM F, then the setbacks shall be equivalent to the requirements of the 2 ATTACHMENT E adjacent residential zone if the setback standards exceed the requirements of the Commercial Zone. NE-"22nd ; Cf NEI Li NEI 106, '� i { i - ... .- 1 .': .. rNE'� tl`�l� E Ii ,i i Nr7lh -St NE 17 t . ' ;Lsa f y_ I � I,l;St; RM—F s 64 E� - V} r�Ilk G ` CA CA CAOA tTth 'Pti 11 f Pt_ _.. C. _ aSE 1#th Y Sf. a. #ffi CRr- E i Gt : 1 1 f 00 1 IN I; - , f� 6 NE,,,Sunset BivdCorridorCommercial r a aw" , „a,,.,,,,, r n.wst �� COMMerd8I Corridor f Nt 16 ff x &; _ . . . ' Cat t PJ CL k r , t ` RM—F CAS NE �-h 3 .. ' �i B 4th Street Business District Srnesm�a Mralagcunl, !1aa/FlaQuarta k :71nea�e llrtali� 7�a�allset/ky1! r. �4mb CA CA T%A CA -- Commercial Comdor rt rt n (D Z rt IM ATTACHMENT G CAtr' tNentG'1 Vilicge PI 'CA co CA CA SAD C A s it st sty Lf9e i CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITE' OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (PANTHER CREEK WETLAND) FROM RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC (R 8) ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL 1 DU/AC (R-1), FILE NO. LUA-05-006 (CPA 2005-M-1, AREA P). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residential 8 du/ac; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 5, 2005, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential 1 du/ac as hereinbelow specified. The EDNSP Administrator is ORDINANCE NO. hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Acreage along the Panther Creek Wetland). SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1232 :11 /21 /05 : ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. 2005. 2 ATTACHMENT A PANTHER CREEK WETLAND REZONE R-8 TO R-1 LUA 05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, AREA P LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That portion of the east half (1/2) of Section 30, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying southerly of the north line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 30, easterly of the easterly right-of-way margin of SR 167 (Primary State Highway No. 5), northerly of the north line of the Valley Medical Center Binding Site Plan, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 9311240441, and westerly of the following described line: Beginning said line at the southeast corner of Lot 4 of the City of Renton Short Plat No. 77-113, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 7808151009, said corner also being a point on the north line of said Valley Medical Center Binding Site Plan; Thence northerly along the west line of said Lot 4, a distance of 421.49 feet, to the northwest corner of said Lot 4; Thence easterly along the north line of said Lot 4, to the southwest corner of the plat of Mance Addition, as recorded in Volume 68 of Plats, Page 21, records of King County, Washington; Thence northerly, easterly and northerly along the west line of said plat, to the most northerly northwest comer of said plat, said northwest corner also being a point on the south line of the plat of Ziegenfuss Addition, as recorded under Volume 93 of Plats, Page 18, records of King County; Thence westerly along said south line, to the southwest corner of said plat; Thence northerly along the west line of said plat, to the northwest comer thereof, Thence northeasterly to the southwest comer of a property described as the south 534.25 feet of that portion of the north half (1/2) of the southeast quarter of said Section 30, lying west of County Road #80 (Talbot Road S), excepting the west 1381.86 feet thereof and the south 224 feet thereof, Thence northerly, along the west line of said property and the northerly extension of said west line, to a point on the south line of the north half (1/2) of the north half (1/2) of said southeast quarter, said point being a distance of 447.57 feet westerly of the westerly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road S (County Road #80); Thence northwesterly to a point on the south line of the north half (1/2) of the north half (1/2) of the north half (1/2) of said Section 30, said point being a distance of 398.03 feet westerly of the westerly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road S (County Road #80), said point also being a point on the south line of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 78-197, as recorded under King County Rec. No. 7908239009; Thence easterly along said south line, to an intersection with the southerly extension of the northern most easterly line of said Lot 4; Thence northwesterly along said southerly extension and said easterly line of said Lot 4, to a point on the north line of the northwest quarter of said southeast quarter, said point also being 224.09 feet westerly of the westerly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road S (County Road #80); Thence easterly along said north line, to the southwest corner of Lot 4 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 90-141, recorded under King County Rec. No. 9703259002, in the northeast quarter of said Section 30; Thence northerly along the west line of said short plat and it northerly extension, to the north line of the south three-quarters of the south half of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter; Thence westerly along said north line, to a point 140.00 feet westerly of the westerly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road S (County Road #80); Thence northwesterly, to a point on the south line of the north half (1/2) of the southwest quarter of said northeast quarter, said point being 162.00 feet westerly of the westerly right-of-way margin of Talbot Road S (County Road #80); Thence westerly along said south line, to the west line of the east 400 feet of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, Thence northerly along said west line, to the north line of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 30 and the terminus of the herein described line. 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON (MAPLEWOOD ADDITION) FROM RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC (R-8) ZONING TO RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC (R-4), FILE NO. LUA-05-006 (CPA 2005- M-1, AREA K3). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residential 8 du/ac; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about October 5, 2005, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residential 4 du/ac as hereinbelow specified. The EDNSP ORDINANCE NO. Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to -wit: See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (The portion of the Maplewood Addition within City Limits). SECTION H. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1234:11/21/05:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor ■ ATTACHMENT A MAPLEWOOD ADDPITON REZONE R-8 TO R 4 LUA 05-006, CPA2005-M-1, AREA K3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The plat of Brodell's Maple Garden Homes, as recorded in Volume 77 of Plats, Page 33, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads; TOGETHER WITH the plat of Paull's Maplewood Addition, as recorded in Volume 53 of Plats, Page 77, records of King County, Washington; EXCEPT roads; All situate in the east half (1/2) of Section 21 and the west half (1/2) of Section 22, all in Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington. LM ment B Maplewood Addition Rezone from R-8 to R--4 LUA05-006, CPA 2005-M-1, Area K3 8Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Sfttegic Pbnning ♦ ♦ Alex Pidwb. Adn*dsu for G.Del Rosub 16 Novanba ZOOS 'i li Ali ;•;•,i:r�::... �r.�::>: >:::::::;:: r:::: is v: t &qied CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. Jr173 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTYAANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-4 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 4DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO R-8 (RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC; EIGHT DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) (MOSIER II; FILE NO. A-05-006). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning, which said annexation having previously been approved and the property annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this zoning application, the first hearing being held on October 24, 2005, and the second hearing being held on November 28, 2005, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned to R-8 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. CO is-p at pt -41kc Kos/& a Armco aukv [Said property, y, approximate v 20.5 acres, is located in Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington]. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1225:11/21/05:ma 2 Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. 2005. EXHIBIT A MOSIER II EXPANDED ANNEXATION, ZONE R-8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lots 1 through 64, inclusive, of the plat of Puget Colony Homes, as recorded in Volume 86 of Plats, Page 59, records of King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH Lot 2 of King County Short Plat No. 881050, recorded under King County Rec. No. 8201220536; and TOGETHER WITH Lots B and C of King County Lot Line Adjustment No. 885073, as approved on September 27,1985; and TOGETHER WITH the south half (1/2) of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 145 feet of the west 140 feet of the east 170 feet thereof, EXCEPT streets. All situate in the northeast quarter of said Section 15. Proposed Mosier II Annexation o 400 800 Zoning Map --- Renton City limits 1 : 4800 GtiT �� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Annexation Boundary :{�i ♦ Alex Pietsch, Administrator Proposed R 8 J� G. Del Rosario ��NT� 30 September 2005 1 6-t read/ng -!�evl'sed /149-0.5 Cs ecfloA ,III added, p. l q) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 4-1-170 AND 4-1-180 OF CHAPTER 1, PUBLIC WORKS FEES, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY CHANGING THE FEE SCHEDULES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Section 4-1-170.A of Chapter 1, Public Works Fees, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding an annexation fee, to read as follows; A. �l��ICATON T` �� �►4�UN'lC Annexation by 60% Direct Petition and 50/50 Petition Method $2,500.00 SECTION IL Sections 4-1-180.H and I of Chapter 1, Public Works Fees, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as follows: H. TEMPORARY UTILITY CONNECTION FEES: Temporary Connections Surface Water Fee Wastewater and Water Fee Temporary connections to a Annual fee equal to ten Annual fee equal to ten City utility system may be percent (10%) of the current percent (10%) of the current granted for a one-time, system development charge system development charge temporary, short-term use applicable to that portion of applicable to that portion of of a portion of the property the property, but not less the property, but not less for a period not to exceed than seven hundred fifty than one thousand three (3) consecutive years nine dollars ($759.00) per seventeen dollars ($1,017) ear* 1 ORDINANCE NO. * Said fee shall be paid annually (nonprorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system. The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development service area for use in the fee determination I. CHARGES FOR EQUITABLE SHARE OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES: Owners of properties to which improvements are being proposed that have not been assessed or charged an equitable share of the cost of public works facilities, such as water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting, shall be subject to one or more of the charges listed in the following subsections. Any fees triggered by improvements or development, as detailed in this Section, are due and payable at the first of the following instances: • Prior to the issuance of a Public Works Construction Permit, or • Prior to the recording of a single family residential plat or single family residential short plat, or • Prior to the issuance of a building permit. All of the following charges shall be paid into the Waterworks Utility Construction Fund except that any fees collected under a private Latecomer's Agreement shall be passed on to the holder of the agreement with the appropriate fees paid to the general fund. For the purposes of this Section the terms "property(ies)" or "parcel(s)" shall mean a lot of record as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC. 1. Private Held Latecomer's Fees and Special Assessment District (Formerly Known as City Held Latecomer's) Fees: a. Applicability of Private Held Latecomer's Fee: The City has the discretionary power, as detailed in chapter 9-5 RMC, to grant latecomer's agreements to developers and owners for the reimbursement of a pro rata portion of public works facilities 2 ORDINANCE NO. (water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting) they install and turn over to the City. b. Applicability of Special Assessment District Fee: The special assessment charge is a fee that enables the City to recover a pro rats portion of the original costs of public works improvements (water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting) from the owners of property who would benefit from future connections to, or future users of, improvements to the City's infrastructure that were not installed by LIDs or by it private developer under a latecomer agreement. The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning these charges are detailed in chapter 9-16 RMC, Special Assessment Districts. Interest may be charged pursuant to RMC 9-16-6, Payments to City. C. Exemptions for Latecomer's or Special Assessment District Fees: i. Segregation of Fees: The City may grant segregation of private developer latecomer's fees or special assessment district fees on large parcels of land per subsection (I)(3) of this Section. ii. Relief Due to Two (2) Similar Facilities: The PlanningBuilding/Public Works Administrator will consider relieving a parcel of a latecomer's or special assessment district fee/assessment if the property has a benefit from either (but not both) of two (2) similar facilities. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will make the decision based on engineering and policy decisions as to which facility(s) benefit and/or are utilized by the parcel. The assessment due would be that associated with the utilized facility. If there are no sound engineering or policy reasons that indicate one facility over the other, the City shall give the applicant the choice of facilities to utilize. 3 ORDINANCE NO. iii. Relief Due to Future Subdivision: At the time the latecomer's agreement or special assessment district is formed, and as a condition of the latecomer's agreement or special assessment district, the City may require that the assessment against a parcel be divided such that a single family residential connection will be assessed based upon the size of a typical single family residential lot in that area. The remainder of the cost attributed to said site will be due at such time as the parcel develops further either by subdivision or increased density. In the case of a special assessment district, interest will continue to accrue on the remaining portion of the assessment. iv. Reallocation of Assessment Due to Subdivision of Property: The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider reallocation of the latecomer's assessment or the special assessment if a property is subdivided for any purpose other than single family use. Reallocation may be granted based upon front footage, area, or other equitable means. Consideration may be given to adjusting the assessment between the new parcels, based upon value of benefit from the improvements, such that two (2) similar parcels may pay different amounts because one receives more benefit. 2. System Development Charges (SDC) — Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water: The City may hold and charge certain other fees similar to special assessment district charges, which are commonly referred to as "system development charges." a. Applicability of System Development Charge: The system development charge is hereby imposed against properties and, by inference, the owners of said properties which have not been assessed or charged or borne an equitable share of the cost of the City's utility systems. Said property owner(s) shall pay, prior to connection to or benefit from a City utility or utility facility, the system development charge associated with that utility as detailed in 4 ORDINANCE NO. the fees table in subsection (1)(2)(b) of this Section. A parcel may benefit from a City utility system during the development or redevelopment of the property with or without a connection to an established facility. Therefore, the system development charge for a utility may be triggered without a physical connection to an existing facility. i. Development of a utility system shall mean: Development of the sanitary sewer system, including but not limited to lift stations, force mains, interceptors and other sewer collection mains. • Development of the surface water system, including but not limited to retention/detention or water quality facilities, flood hazard reduction improvements, lift stations, force mains, interceptors, and other surface water collection and conveyance systems. Development of the water system, including but not limited to wells, pump stations, reservoirs and transmission mains. ii. The phrase "properties, which have not been assessed or charged or borne an equitable share of the cost of the utility," as used in this Section, shall mean any of the following: • First Time Service Connection or Benefit: Any property which has not paid a system development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the property and which is connecting to or benefiting from a Renton utility system for the first time (including but not limited to new construction, conversion from private well, or conversion from septic system). • Further Subdivision: Any property which has not paid a system development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the property and is served or 5 ORDINANCE NO. benefited by the utility and is subdividing further for single family usage shall receive a credit for the existing single family residence(s). For example, a five (5) acre parcel with an existing single family house is being subdivided for single family lots. If the existing house is connected to the City sewer and water systems, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for sanitary sewer, storm water, and water. If the existing house was not connected to the City sewer system, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for storm water and water. A property subdividing further for single family usage that receives a credit for existing single family residence(s) shall not qualify for prorating of the system development charge under subsection (I)(2xc) of this Section. • Existing Developments — Water and/or Sanitary Sewer: Property that was developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances for water and sanitary sewer in 1974 is exempted from the connection charge(s) for water and sanitary sewer. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted property that does not require additional water usage such that a fire hydrant, additional meter, or larger meter is necessary will not trigger a new system development charge. However, except as provided herein, when property is redeveloped or the use changed or intensified such that larger or additional water meter(s) or the addition of a fire hydrant is necessary, application(s) for these items will trigger the system development charge(s). An application for the installation of a meter(s) solely for the purpose of either irrigation or fire protection or the installation of a fire hydrant will trigger a system development charge for water. An application for an additional or a larger water meter(s) for any ORDINANCE NO. purpose other than solely for irrigation or fire protection will trigger a system development charge for both water and sewer. Exceptions: The addition of an irrigation meter only for an existing single family residential dwelling will not trigger a system development charge for water or sewer. If an existing single family residence is being remodeled or rebuilt and remains a single family residence on the same lot (not involved in a new plat, short plat, or lot line adjustment), the addition of a larger or additional meter will not trigger the system development charges for water or sewer. The addition of a second meter to an existing duplex in order to divide consumption for billing purposes will not trigger a system development charge. • Existing Developments — Surface Water: Property that was developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances for surface (storm) water in 1992 is exempted from the surface water system development charge. The addition of any new impervious surface to exempted properties will require payment of the system development charge for surface water for the additional new impervious area only. If an exempted property is making a connection for the first time to a surface water system, it will require payment of the system development charge for surface water only for the impervious area tributary to the point of connection. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted property that does not create additional impervious surface area or does not cause a first time connection to be made will not require payment of the system development charge for surface water. Exceptions: 6 ORDINANCE NO. Improvements to existing single family residential units such as additions that are less than five hundred (500) square feet, decks, small sheds and other minor improvements are exempt from the system development charge for surface water unless a new connection to the Renton surface water utility collection system is proposed or required as part of the permit application. b. System Development Charge Table: Type of Land Use Water Fee Amount Wastewater Fee Surface Water Fee Amount Amount Single family residence $1,956.00 per $1,017.00 per $759.00 per dwelling (Including dwelling unit dwelling unit unit Mobile/Manufactured homes Multi-family(in all $1,174.00 per $610.00 per dwelling $0.265 per square zones except CD and dwelling unit unit (auxiliary foot of new COR zones) (auxiliary buildings buildings like club impervious like club houses are houses are considered surfacing, but not considered inclusive inclusive to the less than $759.00 to the development development and are and are not counted not counted as a as a dwelling unit and dwelling unit and are are thus not included thus not included in in the calculation of the calculation of the the fee) fee Mixed Use (in all zones Mixed use buildings Mixed use buildings $0.265 per square except CD and COR with over 50% floor with over 50% floor foot of new zones) space used for space used for impervious surface, residential shall be residential shall be but not less than assessed at the rate of assessed at the rate of $759.00 $1,174.00 per $610.00 per dwelling dwelling unit unit CD and COR zones $0.273 per gross $0.142 per gross $0.265 per square square foot of square foot of foot of new property, but not less property, but not less impervious surface, than $1,956.00 than $1,017.00 but not less than $759.00 All other uses $0.273 per gross $0.142 per gross $0.265 per square square foot of square foot of foot of new property, but not less property, but not less impervious surface, than $1,956.00 than $1,017.00 but not less than $759.00 8 ORDINANCE NO. C. Prorating the System Development Charge for Redevelopment of Property: An option exists for prorating the system development charge(s) for property which has not previously paid a charge in full. Any parcel that currently has water or sanitary sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge for the associated utility. i. Prorating Based upon Meter Sizes: The prorated system development charge will be based upon the capacity of the new meters as compared to the capacity of the existing meters. Meters installed solely for fire protection, either existing or proposed, are not included in the calculation for water or sanitary sewer. If there is an additional or larger meter solely for fire flow or additional hydrants required for the proposed development, please refer also to sub- section (1)(2)(d)(ii) of this Section. Meters installed solely for irrigation (either existing or proposed) are not included in the calculation for sanitary sewer. This prorated redevelopment charge is calculated using the following formula: [Proposed meter(s) capacity in gallons per minute (GPM) — Existing meter(s) capacity in GPM)/[Proposed meter(s) capacity in GPM] x [SDC Fee] = Amount owed. The City will determine the safe maximum operating capacities of all meter sizes using American Water Works Association tables (see below). The fee paid shall be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. Reduction in meter capacity shall not result in a payment from the City to the applicant. WATER METER EQUIVALENCIES for purposes of calculating redevelopment credit: Meter Size In Inches Safe Maximum Operating Capacity (UM 5/8 20 5/8 x 3/4 20 0 ORDINANCE NO. 3/4 30 1 50 1-1/2 100 2 160 3 300 4 500 6 1000 8 1600 10 2300 12 3375 20 8250 ii. Prorating the System Development Charge for Fire Protection Improvements Associated with Redevelopment of Property: Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system, such as a new hydrant or fire sprinkler system, shall be charged a fee equal to thirty percent (301/o) of the system development charge applicable to the portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve. Thirty percent (30%) is the amount the water utility has expended throughout its system for fire flow protection. This fee shall be posted to the City's database and applied as a partial payment to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. For the purposes of this Section, "portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve" shall be described as: The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty (20) feet around the footprint of the building being served by the meter installed for fire protection. The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty (20) feet around the footprint of the building(s) which by their construction, reconstruction or improvement triggered the need for the new fire hydrant(s). 10 ORDINANCE NO. "Footprint" shall include the primary building plus ancillary structures such as garages, carports, sheds, etc., that are considered by the Fire Department when calculating fire flow requirements. In the case of multiple improvements, overlapping areas shall only be counted once. If the "portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve" is eighty percent (80%) of the parcel or more, then the thirty percent (30%) shall be calculated on the total square footage of the property. If a project both increases water meter capacity and installs a fire protection system, the total of both prorated system development fees (subsections i and ii) would be charged. Payment of said fees would be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. In no case shall the total of the prorated system development charge(s) be more than the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system shall not trigger a sewer system development fee. iii. Prorating the System Development Charge for Installation of an Irrigation Meter Only: When a water meter is installed solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water for private landscaping (exempt meter), there will be charged a fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the water system development charge applicable to the property. Said fee shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another). Payment of said fee would be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. At the applicant's option, the full water system development charge may be paid instead of the ten percent (10%) payment described herein. iv. Examples: 11 ORDINANCE NO. Example 1: A redevelopment project that involves a change from a single family home on a ten thousand (10,000) square foot lot with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter (5/8" x 3/4", a standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20) gallons per minute (GPM), to a commercial usage with a one and one-half inch (1-1/2") meter with a safe operating capacity of one hundred (100) GPM can apply to pay for the following prorated charges: (100 GPM — 20 GPM)/(100 GPM) = 0.8 For water: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.273/sq. ft.) = $2,184.00 For sewer: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.142/sq.ft.) _ $1,136.00 Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $0.142/sq.ft.. x 10,000 sq. ft. _ $1,420.00 for sewer and paid $0.273/sq. ft.. x 10,000 sq. ft. _ $2,730.00 for water. Example 2: A property owner is planning to redevelop a half acre parcel that includes a single family home with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter (5/8" x 3/4", a standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20) GPM. The new development will be an eight (9) unit multi -family dwelling with a two inch (2") meter with a safe operating capacity of one hundred sixty (160) GPM, a three-quarter inch (3/4") irrigation meter with a safe operating capacity of thirty (30) GPM, and a four inch (4") meter for fire sprinklers. The property owner can apply to pay the following prorated charges: For water: based on meters (160 GPM + 30 GPM — 20 GPM)/(160 GPM + 30 GPM) = 89.5% based on fire service = 30•/o Total = 119.5% Therefore, 100'10 of the water system development charge would be due. 12 ORDINANCE NO. (8 units x $1,174.00/unit = $9,392.00 ) For sewer: based on meters — irrigation meter excluded (160 GPM — 20 GPM)/(I 60 GPM) = 87.5% Therefore, 87.5% of the sewer system development charge would be due. 87.5% x (8 units x $610.00 /unit) _ $4,270.00 Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $610.00 /unit x 8 units = $4,880.00. d. Exemptions to System Development Charge: i. Installation of an Irrigation Meter Solely for the Purpose of Providing Irrigation Water to City Right -of -Way: Installation of a water meter solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water to City right-of-way is exempted from the system development charge. ii. Exemption for City -Owned Property: No system development charge will be collected on City -owned properties. The benefits to the utility from the use of other City properties such as utility easements, lift stations and other benefits offset the amount of the system development charge. iii. Limited Exemptions for Municipal Corporations: A limited exemption to the system development charge will be granted to municipal corporations for portions of property subject to the system development charge to the extent that those specific areas are available and maintained at all times for public use (e.g., ballfields adjacent to a school building) and shall be segregated from the fee determination as herein provided. In applying this exemption to the extent possible, a single straight line shall be drawn across the property separating the exempt property from the property to be charged. If a single straight line would 13 ORDINANCE NO. not achieve substantial equity, then additional lines may be drawn to include substantial open space areas in the exemption. For purposes of this exemption, substantial open space areas shall be at least one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet in area. Lines shall not be drawn closer than fifteen feet (15¢) to any structure. Nonexempt Areas: Parking lots, driveways, walkways, similar areas and required landscape areas shall not be part of the exempt area. Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording the segregated fee. At the time of application for system development charge segregation the applicant shall pay the administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00). Restrictive Covenants: The exemption must be memorialized by means of a restrictive covenant running with the land. Should the property exempted under this Section later develop, then that property shall pay the system development charge in place at the time of development. Interpretation of Partial Payment: The Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall make the final decision on the interpretation of this limited exemption and the achievement of substantial equity. iv. Exemption for Undeveloped Critical Area(s) and Undeveloped Major Easement(s): When calculating the area to be charged the system development charge, undeveloped critical areas (per RMC 4-11-030) and undeveloped major easements within the property shall not be included in the square footage for the calculation of the charge. It is the responsibility of the property owner or applicant to submit a study determining and classifying the critical area. The property owner or applicant shall submit a legal description of any 14 ORDINANCE NO. easement(s) or critical area(s) so that these portions of the property can be exempted from the development charge(s). The intent of this exemption is to not charge property that is undevelopable. If the property is used or can be used to satisfy any condition of the development such as parking or landscaping, it shall be considered developed and does not meet the qualifications of this exemption. V. Exemption Credit for Regional Improvements: If an applicant's project proposes to solve a regional drainage problem, over and above the requirements to mitigate their project's impacts, the value of the additional improvement shall be credited toward the surface water system development charges due. The applicant must provide the Administrator of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works with the costs of the drainage improvements and a suggested method of calculating the costs due to the extra work done to solve a regional drainage problem. The Administrator will make the final decision on the amount of the credit. In no instance shall the credit duplicate a latecomer's agreement such that the applicant will be paid twice, nor may the credit against the connection charge exceed the connection charge (i.e., no payment to the applicant under this Section). vi. Surface Water Exemption for Infiltration Facility: Developments which infiltrate or contain on site one hundred percent (100%) of the on -site storm water runoff volume from a one hundred (100) year storm are exempt from the surface water system development charge. For the application of this credit, the owner/developer must use the current design criteria to show that the infiltration facility will infiltrate all of the volume of runoff produced from the site during the one hundred (100) year storm. 15 ORDINANCE NO. If a development that is granted an exemption under this Section discharges water offsite during a one hundred (100) year storm or less, the development shall be required to make corrections or improvements to the onsite system such that it will infiltrate up to the one hundred (100) year storm. It in the future, the development can no longer infiltrate one hundred percent (100%) of the on -site storm water runoff from a one hundred (100) year storm, the systems development charge shall be due and payable as a condition of the connection to or utilization of the City's storm water system. Nothing in this Section shall relieve the property owner(s) from complying with the City's current flow control and water quality treatment standards at the time the development converts from one hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm system. When a development is converted from one hundred percent (1001/o) infiltration to use of the City storm system, the storm water management standards used shall consider the existing conditions prior to the property being developed under the one hundred percent (100%) infiltration exemption and the developed conditions at the time the conversion is made. There may be certain areas within the City that partially or completely prohibit the use of infiltration facilities. If a current or future code or standard prohibits or limits the use of infiltration facilities to any level below the one hundred (100) year storm, the development will not qualify for this exemption. 3. Segregation Criteria and Rules: Except for parcels being developed for single family use, the ability exists for the segregation of system development, special assessment district, and latecomer's charges in the partial development of a large parcel of property. This segregation shall be based on the following criteria and rules: 16 ORDINANCE NO. a. Segregation by Plat or Short Plat: Charges shall be determined on the basis of the specific platted properties being developed regardless of the parcel size. Unplatted or large -platted parcels may be platted or short -platted prior to development, in which case the system development charge will be applied to the specific platted lots being developed. b. Segregation by Administrative Determination: For the partial development of a large tract of property the owner may apply for a segregation of the system development, special assessment district, and latecomer's charge(s) for the specific portion of the property to be developed. The burden of establishing the segregation by legal description, number of units, and map would be on the party owing the fee and not the City. The following criteria shall determine the segregation of fees: Provisions: This provision shall apply to all developments with the exception of single family residential home developments. When a parcel is segregated by administrative determination, prorating of the system development charge for redevelopment shall not be allowed. ii. Segregation of Fees: The segregation of fees shall be by formal, written agreement, including a legal description approved by the City, which shall be recorded as a restrictive covenant running with the land. The restrictive covenant shall list the percentage of the system development charge fee that has been paid for the property. The applicant shall also include a detailed plan, drafted to current adopted City standards, of the proposed development, which shall include the proposed boundary line, as described in the legal description, for the system development charge determination. iii. Segregated Areas: Minimum size of area segregated for determination and payment of system development charge(s) shall be two (2) acres. The 17 ORDINANCE NO. segregated area shall include, but not be limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system development charge(s) have not been paid; all proposed buildings; driveways and sidewalks; parking areas; grass and landscape areas; public access areas; storm drainage facilities and detention ponds; and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The boundary line for the segregation of system development charge shall be established by survey and legal description and shall not be closer than fifteen feet (15¢) to any structure. iv. Remnant Parcel: Minimum size of the remnant parcel of undeveloped property for which the system development charge is deferred shall be two (2) acres. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later develop, then that property shall pay the system development charge fee in place at the time of development. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later be subdivided, then the partial payment credit shall run with the subdivided lots. The burden of establishing that the partial payment has been made would be on the party owing the fee and not on the City. V. Determination of Charge: The system development charge shall be determined on the basis of the percentage of a property that is developed (existing development plus proposed development). When a proposed development takes a parcel over the threshold of full development, as described in this Section, one hundred percent (100%) of the system development charge(s) is owed and any balance is due and payable. vi. Full Development: For the purpose of this Code, "full development" is considered to be sixty percent (60%) property coverage for multi -family development and eighty percent (80%) property coverage for commercial, industrial, mixed use, and all other development. "Property coverage" is defined as the portion of the property 18 ORDINANCE NO. supporting buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). vii. Developed Area: The "developed area" shall include, but not be limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system development charges have not been paid: all existing and proposed buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts. viii. Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the fee(s). At the time of application for system development charge partial payment the applicant shall pay the administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) for each segregation. If the same segregation is used for more than one utility's system development charge, then only one administrative fee is collected. ix. Interpretation: The Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall make the final decision on interpretation of the partial payment of system development charges. 4dded -;�r SE HL Section 4-9-010 of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 4-9-010 ANNEXATION PROCEDURES: It is the intention of the City Council that provisions of State law governing annexations as set forth in chapter 35A.14 RCW as it presently exists or as it may be amended shall control IV ORDINANCE NO. and that this section shall be supplemental thereto. Upon filing a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings with the City Clerk, as referenced in RMC 4-8-120.D., the submitting party shall simultaneously pay an annexation processing fee in the amount stipulated in Section 4-1-170.A to compensate the City for administrative cost and expense in the processing, checking and handling of such annexation request, which fee shall likewise include the publication and posting expense of any notice pertaining to the annexation. SECTION W. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 72005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1214:11/28/05:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor RE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. &'I g Added: 21nd 1'2I5/ Zoorj �dopfeJ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING AND REESTABLISHING THE PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR THE YEAR 2006 FOR BOTH GENERAL PURPOSES AND FOR VOTER APPROVED BOND ISSUES. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has met and considered its budget for the calendar year 2006; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5167 establishing the property tax levy for the year 2006; and WHEREAS, new information was made available to the Council prior to the ordinance's adoption, which changed the figures in Ordinance No. 5167, requiring an amendment; and WHEREAS, this ordinance reconciles the figures in the ordinance with those presented to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton, after hearing and duly considering all relevant evidence and testimony presented, determined that the City of Renton requires a regular levy in the amount of $22,209,409, which includes an increase in property tax revenue from the previous year, and amounts resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase in the value of state -assessed property, and amounts authorized by law as a result of any annexations that have occurred and refunds made, in order to discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the City and in its best interest; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton also has a voter -approved property tax levy for Senior Housing Bonds, and the debt service requirement on those bonds is $514,100 in 2006; and WHEREAS, the City must levy this amount in order to discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the bond; ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The regular property tax levy is hereby authorized for the 2006 levy in the amount of $22,209,409, which is a percentage increase of 1 percent from the previous year plus amounts for new construction and annexations. SECTION H. In addition, the City of Renton requires a levy of $514,100 for the purpose of paying debt service on voter approved Bonds for Senior Housing. SECTION M. The total property tax levy for the City of Renton shall be $22,723,509. This increase is inclusive of revenue resulting from the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any increase in the value of state assessed property, and any additional amounts resulting from any annexations that have occurred and refunds made. SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and approval. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 12005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1239:12/2/05:ma 16-t reading -Revi'scd 1149-05 (S echon -Madded, p- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTIONS 4-1-170 AND 4-1-180 OF CHAPTER 1, PUBLIC WORKS FEES, OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY CHANGING THE FEE SCHEDULES. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L Section 4-1-170.A of Chapter I, Public Works Fees, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended by adding an annexation fee, to read as follows; A. APPLICATION TYPE: FEE AMOUNT:. Annexation by 60% Direct Petition and 50/50 Petition Method $2,500.00 SECTION H. Sections 4-1-180.H and I of Chapter 1, Public Works Fees, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to read as follows: H. TEMPORARY UTILITY CONNECTION FEES: Temporary Connections Surface Water Fee Wastewater and Water Fee Temporary connections to a Annual fee equal to ten Annual fee equal to ten City utility system may be percent (10%) of the current percent (10%) of the current granted for a one-time, system development charge system development charge temporary, short-term use applicable to that portion of applicable to that portion of of a portion of the property the property, but not less the property, but not less for a period not to exceed than seven hundred fifty than one thousand three (3) consecutive years nine dollars ($759.00) per seventeen dollars ($1,017) year*I per ear* 1 ORDINANCE NO. * Said fee shall be paid annually (nonprorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the Property to another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system. The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development service area for use in the fee determination. I. CHARGES FOR EQUITABLE SHARE OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES: Owners of properties to which improvements are being proposed that have not been assessed or charged an equitable share of the cost of public works facilities, such as water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting, shall be subject to one or more of the charges listed in the following subsections. Any fees triggered by improvements or development, as detailed in this Section, are due and payable at the first of the following instances: • Prior to the issuance of a Public Works Construction Permit, or • Prior to the recording of a single family residential plat or single family residential short plat, or • Prior to the issuance of a building permit. All of the following charges shall be paid into the Waterworks Utility Construction Fund except that any fees collected under a private Latecomer's Agreement shall be passed on to the holder of the agreement with the appropriate fees paid to the general fund. For the purposes of this Section the terms "property(ies)" or "parcel(s)" shall mean a lot of record as defined in chapter 4-11 RMC. I. Private Held Latecomer's Fees and Special Assessment District (Formerly Known as City Held Latecomer's) Fees: a. Applicability of Private Held Latecomer's Fee: The City has the discretionary power, as detailed in chapter 9-5 RMC, to grant latecomer's agreements to developers and owners for the reimbursement of a pro rasa portion of public works facilities 2 ORDINANCE NO. (water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting) they install and turn over to the City. b. Applicability of Special Assessment District Fee: The special assessment charge is a fee that enables the City to recover a pro rata portion of the original costs of public works improvements (water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water drainage systems, and street improvements including signalization and lighting) from the owners of property who would benefit from future connections to, or future users of, improvements to the City's infrastructure that were not installed by LIDs or by it private developer under a latecomer agreement. The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning these charges are detailed in chapter 9-16 RMC, Special Assessment Districts. Interest may be charged pursuant to RMC 9-16-6, Payments to City. C. Exemptions for Latecomer's or Special Assessment District Fees: i. Segregation of Fees: The City may grant segregation of private developer latecomer's fees or special assessment district fees on large parcels of laud per subsection (1)(3) of this Section. ii. Relief Due to Two (2) Similar Facilities: The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider relieving a parcel of a latecomer's or special assessment district feelassessment if the property has a benefit from either (but not both) of two (2) similar facilities. The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will make the decision based on engineering and policy decisions as to which facility(s) benefit and/or are utilized by the parcel. The assessment due would be that associated with the utilized facility. If there are no sound engineering or policy reasons that indicate one facility over the other, the City shall give the applicant the choice of facilities to utilize. 3 ORDINANCE NO. iii. Relief Due to Future Subdivision: At the time the latecomer's agreement or special assessment district is formed, and as a condition of the latecomer's agreement or special assessment district, the City may require that the assessment against a parcel be divided such that a single family residential connection will be assessed based upon the size of a typical single family residential lot in that area. The remainder of the cost attributed to said site will be due at such time as the parcel develops further either by subdivision or increased density. In the case of a special assessment district, interest will continue to accrue on the remaining portion of the assessment. iv. Reallocation of Assessment Due to Subdivision of Property: The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator will consider reallocation of the latecomer's assessment or the special assessment if a property is subdivided for any purpose other than single family use. Reallocation may be granted based upon front footage, area, or other equitable means. Consideration may be given to adjusting the assessment between the new parcels, based upon value of benefit from the improvements, such that two (2) similar parcels may pay different amounts because one receives more benefit. 2. System Development Charges (SDC) — Water, Wastewater, and Surface Water: The City may hold and charge certain other fees similar to special assessment district charges, which are commonly referred to as "system development charges." a. Applicability of System Development Charge: The system development charge is hereby imposed against properties and, by inference, the owners of said properties which have not been assessed or charged or borne an equitable share of the cost of the City's utility systems. Said property owner(s) shall pay, prior to connection to or benefit from a City utility or utility facility, the system development charge associated with that utility as detailed in 4 ORDINANCE NO. the fees table in subsection (1)(2)(b) of this Section. A parcel may benefit from a City utility system during the development or redevelopment of the property with or without a connection to an established facility. Therefore, the system development charge for a utility may be triggered without a physical connection to an existing facility. i. Development of a utility system shalt mean: Development of the sanitary sewer system, including but not limited to lift stations, force mains, interceptors and other sewer collection mains. Development of the surface water system, including but not limited to retention/detention or water quality facilities, flood hazard reduction improvements, lift stations, force mains, interceptors, and other surface water collection and conveyance systems. Development of the water system, including but not limited to wells, pump stations, reservoirs and transmission mains. ii. The phrase "properties, which have not been assessed or charged or borne an equitable share of the cost of the utility," as used in this Section, shall mean any of the following: First Time Service Connection or Benefit: Any property which has not paid a system development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the property and which is connecting to or benefiting from a Renton utility system for the first time (including but not limited to new construction, conversion from private well, or conversion from septic system). Further Subdivision: Any property which has not paid a system development charge for the property based upon the total square footage of the property and is served or 5 ORDINANCE NO. benefited by the utility and is subdividing further for single family usage shall receive a credit for the existing single family residence(s). For example, a five (5) acre parcel with an existing single family house is being subdivided for single family lots. If the existing house is connected to the City sewer and water systems, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for sanitary sewer, storm water, and water. If the existing house was not connected to the City sewer system, the development would get credit for one single family system development charge for storm water and water. A property subdividing further for single family usage that receives a credit for existing single family residence(s) shall not qualify for prorating of the system development charge under subsection (1)(2)(c) of this Section. • Existing Developments — Water and/or Sanitary Sewer: Property that was developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances for water and sanitary sewer in 1974 is exempted from the connection charge(s) for water and sanitary sewer. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted property that does not require additional water usage such that a fire hydrant, additional meter, or larger meter is necessary will not trigger a new system development charge. However, except as provided herein, when property is redeveloped or the use changed or intensified such that larger or additional water meter(s) or the addition of a fire hydrant is necessary, application(s) for these items will trigger the system development charge(s). An application for the installation of a meter(s) solely for the purpose of either irrigation or fire protection or the installation of a fire hydrant will trigger a system development charge for water. An application for an additional or a larger water meter(s) for any ORDINANCE NO. purpose other than solely for irrigation or fire protection will trigger a system development charge for both water and sewer. Exceptions: The addition of an irrigation meter only for an existing single family residential dwelling will not trigger a system development charge for water or sewer. If an existing single family residence is being remodeled or rebuilt and remains a single family residence on the same lot (not involved in a new plat, short plat, or lot line adjustment), the addition of a larger or additional meter will not trigger the system development charges for water or sewer. The addition of a second meter to an existing duplex in order to divide consumption for billing purposes will not trigger a system development charge. Existing Developments — Surface Water: Property that was developed before the effective date of the first development charge ordinances for surface (storm) water in 1992 is exempted from the surface water system development charge. The addition of any new impervious surface to exempted properties will require payment of the system development charge for surface water for the additional new impervious area only. If an exempted property is making a connection for the first time to a surface water system, it will require payment of the system development charge for surface water only for the impervious area tributary to the point of connection. Any rebuilding, change in use or additions to exempted property that does not create additional impervious surface area or does not cause a first time connection to be made will not require payment of the system development charge for surface water. Exceptions: ri ORDINANCE NO. Improvements to existing single family residential units such as additions that are less than five hundred (500) square feet, decks, small sheds and other minor improvements are exempt from the system development charge for surface water unless a new connection to the Renton surface water utility collection system is proposed or required as part of the permit application. b. System Development Charge Table: Type of Land Use Water Fee Amount Wastewater Fee Surface Water Fee Amount Amount Single family residence $1,956.00 per $1,017.00 per $759.00 per dwelling (Including dwelling unit dwelling unit unit Mobile/Manufactured homes Multi-family(in all $1,174.00 per $610.00 per dwelling $0.265 per square zones except CD and dwelling unit unit (auxiliary foot of new COR zones) (auxiliary buildings buildings like club impervious like club houses are houses are considered surfacing, but not considered inclusive inclusive to the less than $759.00 to the development development and are and are not counted not counted as a as a dwelling unit and dwelling unit and are are thus not included thus not included in in the calculation of the calculation of the the fee) fee Mixed Use (in all zones Mixed use buildings Mixed use buildings $0.265 per square except CD and COR with over 50% floor with over 50% floor foot of new zones) space used for space used for impervious surface, residential shall be residential shall be but not less than assessed at the rate of assessed at the rate of $759.00 $1,174.00 per $610.00 per dwelling dwelling unit unit CD and COR zones $0.273 per gross $0.142 per gross $0.265 per square square foot of square foot of foot of new property, but not less property, but not less impervious surface, than $1,956.00 than $1,017.00 but not less than $759.00 All other uses $0.273 per gross $0.142 per gross $0.265 per square square foot of square foot of foot of new property, but not less property, but not less impervious surface, than $1,956.00 than $1,017.00 but not less than $759.00 8 ORDINANCE NO. C. Prorating the System Development Charge for Redevelopment of Property: An option exists for prorating the system development charge(s) for property which has not previously paid a charge in full. Any parcel that currently has water or sanitary sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge for the associated utility. i. Prorating Based upon Meter Sizes: The prorated system development charge will be based upon the capacity of the new meters as compared to the capacity of the existing meters. Meters installed solely for fire protection, either existing or proposed, are not included in the calculation for water or sanitary sewer. If there is an additional or larger meter solely for fire flow or additional hydrants required for the proposed development, please refer also to sub- section (1)(2)(d)(ii) of this Section. Meters installed solely for irrigation (either existing or proposed) are not included in the calculation for sanitary sewer. This prorated redevelopment charge is calculated using the following formula: [Proposed meter(s) capacity in gallons per minute (GPM) — Existing meter(s) capacity in GPM]/[Proposed meter(s) capacity in GPM] x [SDC Fee] = Amount owed. The City will determine the safe maximum operating capacities of all meter sizes using American Water Works Association tables (see below). The fee paid shall be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. Reduction in meter capacity shall not result in a payment from the City to the applicant. WATER METER EQUIVALENCIES for purposes of calculating redevelopment credit: Meter Size In Inches Safe Maximum Operating Capacity (GPM 5/8 20 5/8 x 3/4 20 E ORDINANCE NO. 3/4 30 1 50 1-1/2 100 2 160 3 300 4 500 6 1000 8 1600 10 2300 12 3375 20 8250 ii. Prorating the System Development Charge for Fire Protection Improvements Associated with Redevelopment of Property: Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system, such as a new hydrant or fire sprinkler system, shall be charged a fee equal to thirty percent (300/9) of the system development charge applicable to the portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve. Thirty percent (30%) is the amount the water utility has expended throughout its system for fire flow protection. This fee shall be posted to the City's database and applied as a partial payment to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. For the purposes of this Section, "portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve" shall be described as: The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty (20) feet around the footprint of the building being served by the meter installed for fire protection. The smaller area of either the total square footage of the property or the square footage of the property designated by a line drawn twenty (20) feet around the footprint of the building(s) which by their construction, reconstruction or improvement triggered the need for the new fire hydrant(s). 10 ORDINANCE NO. "Footprint" shall include the primary building plus ancillary structures such as garages, carports, sheds, etc., that are considered by the Fire Department when calculating fire flow requirements. In the case of multiple improvements, overlapping areas shall only be counted once. If the "portion of the parcel containing the improvements for which the fire protection system is constructed to serve" is eighty percent (80%) of the parcel or more, then the thirty percent (30%) shall be calculated on the total square footage of the property. If a project both increases water meter capacity and installs a fire protection system, the total of both prorated system development fees (subsections i and ii) would be charged. Payment of said fees would be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. In no case shall the total of the prorated system development charge(s) be more than the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. Installation of a water meter solely for a fire protection system shall not trigger a sewer system development fee. iii. Prorating the System Development Charge for Installation of an Irrigation Meter Only: When a water meter is installed solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water for private landscaping (exempt meter), there will be charged a fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the water system development charge applicable to the property. Said fee shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another). Payment of said fee would be posted in the City's database and applied to the total system development charge applicable for the parcel. At the applicant's option, the full water system development charge may be paid instead of the ten percent (10%) payment described herein. iv. Examples: 11 ORDINANCE NO. Example 1: A redevelopment project that involves a change from a single family home on a ten thousand (10,000) square foot lot with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter (5/8" x 3/4", a standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20) gallons per minute (GPM), to a commercial usage with a one and one-half inch (1-1/2") meter with a safe operating capacity of one hundred (100) GPM can apply to pay for the following prorated charges: (100 GPM — 20 GPM)/(100 GPM) = 0.8 For water: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.273/sq. ft.) = $2,184.00 For sewer: 0.8 x (10,000 sq. ft. x $0.142/sq.ft.) _ $1,136.00 Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $0.142/sq.ft.. x 10,000 sq. ft. = $1,420.00 for sewer and paid $0.273/sq. ft.. x 10,000 sq. ft. = $2,730.00 for water. Example 2: A property owner is planning to redevelop a half acre parcel that includes a single family home with a five -eighths inch by three-quarter inch meter (5/8" x 3/4", a standard single family meter) that has a safe operating capacity of twenty (20) GPM. The new development will be an eight (9) unit multi -family dwelling with a two inch (2") meter with a safe operating capacity of one hundred sixty (160) GPM, a three-quarter inch (3/4") irrigation meter with a safe operating capacity of thirty (30) GPM, and a four inch (4") meter for fire sprinklers. The property owner can apply to pay the following prorated charges: For water: based on meters (160 GPM + 30 GPM — 20 GPM)/(160 GPM + 30 GPM) = 99.5% based on fire service = 30% Total = 119.5% Therefore, 100% of the water system development charge would be due. 12 ORDINANCE NO. (8 units x $1,174.00/unit = $9,392.00 ) For sewer: based on meters — irrigation meter excluded (160 GPM — 20 GPM)/(I 60 GPM) = 87.5% Therefore, 87.5% of the sewer system development charge would be due. 87.5% x (8 units x $610.00 /unit) _ $4,270.00 Without the redevelopment credit, this project would have paid $610.00 /unit x 8 units = $4,880.00. d. Exemptions to System Development Charge: i. Installation of an Irrigation Meter Solely for the Purpose of Providing Irrigation Water to City Right -of -Way: Installation of a water meter solely for the purpose of providing irrigation water to City right-of-way is exempted from the system development charge. ii. Exemption for City -Owned Property: No system development charge will be collected on City -owned properties. The benefits to the utility from the use of other City properties such as utility easements, lift stations and other benefits offset the amount of the system development charge. iii. Limited Exemptions for Municipal Corporations: A limited exemption to the system development charge will be granted to municipal corporations for portions of property subject to the system development charge to the extent that those specific areas are available and maintained at all times for public use (e.g., ballfields adjacent to a school building) and shall be segregated from the fee determination as herein provided. In applying this exemption to the extent possible, a single straight line shall be drawn across the property separating the exempt property from the property to be charged. If a single straight line would 13 ORDINANCE NO. not achieve substantial equity, then additional lines may be drawn to include substantial open space areas in the exemption. For purposes of this exemption, substantial open space areas shall be at least one hundred thousand (100,000) square feet in area. Lines shall not be drawn closer than fifteen feet (15¢) to any structure. • Nonexempt Areas: Parking lots, driveways, walkways, similar areas and required landscape areas shall not be part of the exempt area. Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording the segregated fee. At the time of application for system development charge segregation the applicant shall pay the administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00). • Restrictive Covenants: The exemption must be memorialized by means of a restrictive covenant running with the land. Should the property exempted under this Section later develop, then that property shall pay the system development charge in place at the time of development. Interpretation of Partial Payment: The Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall make the final decision on the interpretation of this limited exemption and the achievement of substantial equity. iv. Exemption for Undeveloped Critical Area(s) and Undeveloped Major Easement(s): When calculating the area to be charged the system development charge, undeveloped critical areas (per RMC 4-11-030) and undeveloped major easements within the property shall not be included in the square footage for the calculation of the charge. It is the responsibility of the property owner or applicant to submit a study determining and classifying the critical area. The property owner or applicant shall submit a legal description of any 14 ORDINANCE NO. easement(s) or critical area(s) so that these portions of the property can be exempted from the development charge(s). The intent of this exemption is to not charge property that is undevelopable. If the property is used or can be used to satisfy any condition of the development such as parking or landscaping, it shall be considered developed and does not meet the qualifications of this exemption. V. Exemption Credit for Regional Improvements: If an applicant's project proposes to solve a regional drainage problem, over and above the requirements to mitigate their project's impacts, the value of the additional improvement shall be credited toward the surface water system development charges due. The applicant must provide the Administrator of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works with the costs of the drainage improvements and a suggested method of calculating the costs due to the extra work done to solve a regional drainage problem. The Administrator will make the final decision on the amount of the credit. In no instance shall the credit duplicate a latecomer's agreement such that the applicant will be paid twice, nor may the credit against the connection charge exceed the connection charge (i.e., no payment to the applicant under this Section). vi. Surface Water Exemption for Infiltration Facility: Developments which infiltrate or contain on site one hundred percent (100%) of the on -site storm water runoff volume from a one hundred (100) year storm are exempt from the surface water system development charge. For the application of this credit, the owner/developer must use the current design criteria to show that the infiltration facility will infiltrate all of the volume of runoff produced from the site during the one hundred (100) year storm. 15 ORDINANCE NO. If a development that is granted an exemption under this Section discharges water offsite during a one hundred (100) year storm or less, the development shall be required to make corrections or improvements to the onsite system such that it will infiltrate up to the one hundred (100) year storm. If, in the future, the development can no longer infiltrate one hundred percent (100%) of the on -site storm water runoff from a one hundred (100) year storm, the systems development charge shall be due and payable as a condition of the connection to or utilization of the City's storm water system. Nothing in this Section shall relieve the property owner(s) from complying with the City's current flow control and water quality treatment standards at the time the development converts from one hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm system. When a development is converted from one hundred percent (100%) infiltration to use of the City storm system, the storm water management standards used shall consider the existing conditions prior to the property being developed under the one hundred percent (100%) infiltration exemption and the developed conditions at the time the conversion is made. There may be certain areas within the City that partially or completely prohibit the use of infiltration facilities. If a current or future code or standard prohibits or limits the use of infiltration facilities to any level below the one hundred (100) year storm, the development will not qualify for this exemption. 3. Segregation Criteria and Rules: Except for parcels being developed for single family use, the ability exists for the segregation of system development, special assessment district, and latecomer's charges in the partial development of a large parcel of property. This segregation shall be based on the following criteria and rules: 16 ORDINANCE NO. a. Segregation by Plat or Short Plat: Charges shall be determined on the basis of the specific platted properties being developed regardless of the parcel size. Unplatted or large -platted parcels may be platted or short -platted prior to development, in which case the system development charge will be applied to the specific platted lots being developed. b. Segregation by Administrative Determination: For the partial development of a large tract of property the owner may apply for a segregation of the system development, special assessment district, and latecomer's charge(s) for the specific portion of the property to be developed. The burden of establishing the segregation by legal description, number of units, and map would be on the party owing the fee and not the City. The following criteria shall determine the segregation of fees: i. Provisions: This provision shall apply to all developments with the exception of single family residential home developments. When a parcel is segregated by administrative determination, prorating of the system development charge for redevelopment shall not be allowed. ii. Segregation of Fees: The segregation of fees shall be by formal, written agreement, including a legal description approved by the City, which shall be recorded as a restrictive covenant running with the land. The restrictive covenant shall list the percentage of the system development charge fee that has been paid for the property. The applicant shall also include a detailed plan, drafted to current adopted City standards, of the proposed development, which shall include the proposed boundary line, as described in the legal description, for the system development charge determination. iii. Segregated Areas: Minimum size of area segregated for determination and payment of system development charge(s) shall be two (2) acres. The 17 ORDINANCE NO. segregated area shall include, but not be limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system development charge(s) have not been paid; all proposed buildings; driveways and sidewalks; parking areas; grass and landscape areas; public access areas; storm drainage facilities and detention ponds; and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The boundary line for the segregation of system development charge shall be established by survey and legal description and shall not be closer than fifteen feet (15¢) to any structure. iv. Remnant Parcel: Minimum size of the remnant parcel of undeveloped property for which the system development charge is deferred shall be two (2) acres. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later develop, then that property shall pay the system development charge fee in place at the time of development. Should the property partially paid for under this Section later be subdivided, then the partial payment credit shall run with the subdivided lots. The burden of establishing that the partial payment has been made would be on the party owing the fee and not on the City. V. Determination of Charge: The system development charge shall be determined on the basis of the percentage of a property that is developed (existing development plus proposed development). When a proposed development takes a parcel over the threshold of full development, as described in this Section, one hundred percent (100%) of the system development charge(s) is owed and any balance is due and payable. vi. Full Development: For the purpose of this Code, "full development" is considered to be sixty percent (60%) property coverage for multi -family development and eighty percent (80%) property coverage for commercial, industrial, mixed use, and all other development. "Property coverage" is defined as the portion of the property 18 ORDINANCE NO. supporting buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). vii. Developed Area: The "developed area" shall include, but not be limited to, all contiguous existing developed land for which the system development charges have not been paid: all existing and proposed buildings, driveways and sidewalks, parking areas, grass and landscape areas, public access areas, storm drainage facilities and detention ponds, and improvements required for mitigation of environmental impacts. viii. Administrative Fees: The applicant shall pay the City's administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the fee(s). At the time of application for system development charge partial payment the applicant shall pay the administrative fee of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00) for each segregation. If the same segregation is used for more than one utility's system development charge, then only one administrative fee is collected. ix. Interpretation: The Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department shall make the final decision on interpretation of the partial payment of system development charges. Mde,d -;�r SECTION UML Section 4-9-010 of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 4-9-010 ANNEXATION PROCEDURES: It is the intention of the City Council that provisions of State law governing annexations as set forth in chapter 35A.14 RCW as it presently exists or as it may be amended shall control 19 ORDINANCE NO. and that this section shall be supplemental thereto. Upon filing a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation Proceedings with the City Clerk, as referenced in RMC 4-8-120.D., the submitting party shall simultaneously pay an annexation processing fee in the amount stipulated in Section 4-1-170.A to compensate the City for administrative cost and expense in the processing, checking and handling of such annexation request, which fee shall likewise include the publication and posting expense of any notice pertaining to the annexation. SECTION IV. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and 30 days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of . 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1214:11 /28/05 : ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 20 lSf�aC1� 11-a� OS CITY OF RENTON WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5170 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 4-9-060 OF CHAPTER 9, PERMITS -- SPECIFIC; OF TITLE IV (DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY ALLOWING APPLICATION FOR A FEE IN LIEU OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION. Section 4-9-060.C.9 of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows: 9. Fee In Lieu Of Required Street ILnprovements: a. General. The provisions of this section establish under what circumstances the requirements of this chapter may be satisfied with payment of a fee in lieu of required street impovements. b. Authoft To Grant and Duration. (1) Application: If the proposed development of the subject property requires approval through a short plat approval described in the subdivision ordinance, a request for payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements will be considered as part of this process under the provisions of this section. (2) Duration: If granted under a short plat review process, the authorization to pay a fee in lieu of street improvements is binding on the City for all development permits issued for that short plat approval under the Building Code within 1 ORDINANCE NO. five (5) years of the granting of the request for payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements. C. Standards: The City will not accept the applicant's proposed payment of a fee in lieu of street improvements if the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator or his/her designee determines that it is in the City's interest that the street improvements be installed abutting the subject property, taking into account such factors as the pedestrian safety impacts that result from the development. The City may accept payment of a fee in lieu instead of requiring installation of street improvements in the following circumstances: (1) There are no similar improvements in the vicinity and there is no likelihood that the improvements will be needed or required in the next five (5) years; or (2) Installation of the required improvement would require substantial off -site roadway modifications; or (3) The Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator or his/her designee determines that installation of the required improvement would result in a safety hazard; or (4) Other unusual circumstances preclude the construction of the improvements as required. d. Amount of Payment of Fee in Lieu of Street L—provements. In each instance where the City approves a proposed fee -in -lieu under the provisions of this section, the amount of the fee -in -lieu shall be 100 percent of the then - estimated cost of constructing the street improvements that would otherwise be required under this chapter, based on information compiled and kept current by the 2 ORDINANCE NO. Planning/Building/Public Works Department on the cost of street improvement construction. e. Use of Funds. In each instance where the City accepts payment of a fee in lieu of installing a street improvement under the provisions of this section, the City shall deposit those funds into a reserve account and expend the funds collected within five (5) years of the date collected to fund other pedestrian safety improvements in the City. f. No Further Obligation from the Propgrt}ft., In each instance where the City accepts payment of a fee in lieu of installing street improvements, the subject property will not be subject to participation in future street improvement costs (along the property frontage) unless redevelopment occurs that will generate more traffic trips than what was occurring at the property at the time of the payment of the fee in lieu of installation of street improvements. SECTION H. Section 4-9-060.C.10 of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby deleted. SECTION M This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and. 30 days after publication. PASSED BY TBE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 3 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD.1216:11 / 16/05 : ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 4 l57`,Ua4g# CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. S171 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (MOSIER II ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-05-006) WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 as amended, a petition in writing requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about June 28, 2004; and WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120, and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to assume the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified the signatures on the petition for annexation and determined signatures represent assessed value, as provided by law, in excess of sixty percent (60%) of the area to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Renton; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the City Council fixed February 7, 2005, as the time and place for public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, the City notified the King County Boundary Review Board on May 9, 2005, that it was invoking its jurisdiction and requesting consideration of expanded annexation boundaries; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board met on July 18, 2005, and July 19, 2005, and held a public hearings to consider the "Notice of Intention" and possible expansion of the original 31-acre annexation site to 65-acres; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having considered the "Notice of Intention", issued its closing letter on September 13, 2005, approving it with modifications; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.340, the Council is required to hold two public hearings on zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed October 10, 2005, and November 28, 2005, as the time and place for public hearings in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, on the expanded annexation and possible future zoning thereon and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices public hearings have been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with 2 ORDINANCE NO. the petition and possible future zoning further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently prezoning the annexation site R-4 and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein E,i eonsi�-+ o� iK 4ke- vict"Wrsf 1V��" q,,S � Z 136 [Said propertl, approximately 65 acres, is located in the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington;] 3 ORDINANCE NO. and the owners -petitioners of the property shall assume the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains to the property, and the property to be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1223:11/21/05:ma 4 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. EXHIBIT A MOSIER II EXPANDED ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION The southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; EXCEPT the north 30 feet of the east 30 feet thereof, and EXCEPT the north 30 feet thereof lying westerly of the southerly extension of the east line of Lot 1 of King Count Short Plat No. 881050, to the southerly right-of- way margin of SE 132°d Street (NE 2° Street), said short plat located in the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 15; and EXCEPT the west 42 feet of said southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15; TOGETHER WITH the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 15, EXCEPT the east 30 feet thereof; and TOGETHER WITH the south half (1/2) of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 15; EXCEPT the north 145 feet of the west 140 feet of the east 170 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the east 30 feet for road; and TOGETHER WITH the south half (1/2) of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 15; EXCEPT that portion lying westerly of the east line of said Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 881050 and the southerly extension of said east line to the south line of said subdivision; TOGETHER WITH Tracts 10 and 11 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 101, records of King County, Washington; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of 144`h Avenue SE, within the west 30 feet of the east half (1/2) of the northeast quarter of said Section 15, lying southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton, as annexed by Ordinance No. 4876; TOGETHER WITH that portion of SE 1360' Street and 144`h Avenue SE, within the north 30 feet of the east half (1/2) of the east half (1/2) of the west half (1/2) of the southeast quarter of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of 1441h Avenue SE, within the north 30 feet of the west 30 feet of the east half (1/2) of the southeast quarter of said Section 15; and TOGETHER WITH that portion of SE 136`h Street, within the north 30 feet of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 15, EXCEPT the north 30 feet of the west quarter (1/4) thereof. a Mop W is s aoas CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING TTE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY,'- °ED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-4 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 4DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO R-4 (RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC; FOUR DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) - - ). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning, which said annexation having previously been approved and the property annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this zoning application, the first hearing being held on October 24, 2005 and the second hearing being held on November 28, 2005, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 1 ORDINANCE NO. SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned to R-4 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. CD 6tt} *5 of � OF � Atostcr IT krte-t4ga' Q��9 [Said property, approximately 4.7 ac , is located in Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington] SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and thirty days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1224:11 /21 /05 :ma 2 Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. 2005. EXHIBIT A MOSIER II EXPANDED ANNEXATION, ZONE R-4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington; EXCEPT the east 30 feet, the west 30 feet and the south 30 feet thereof, TOGETHER WITH Tracts 10, 11, 25, 28, 29, and 32 of Black Loam Five Acre Tracts, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 101, records of King County, Washington; All situate in the northeast quarter of said Section 15.