No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 09/12/2005AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCI L REGULAR MEETING September 12, 2005 Monday, 7:30 p.m. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL. CALL 3. PROCLAMATION: National Anthem Project Day - September 14, 2005 4. PUBLIC HEARING: Park Terrace Annexation and future zoning for 80 acres (expanded from 7.65 acres by the Boundary Review Board for King County) located between SE 1 12th and 122nd Streets, if extended, and east of Anacortes Ave. NE to 142nd and 144th Avenues SE 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Counciimember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 8/15/2005. Council concur. b. City Clerk submits request from Kevin M. Wyman and Durwood E. Blood, 16540 SE 149th St., Renton, 98059, for a latecomer agreement for sewer main extension along SE 132nd St. at 152nd Ave. SE. Refer to Utilities Committee. c. Court Case filed on behalf of Jason Echon Masangkay by Marja Starczewski, 18520 44th Ave. W., Lynnwood, 98037, who seeks compensation for emotional distress allegedly due to violation of civil rights when arrested on 11/13/98. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. d. Development Services Division recommends approval, with conditions, of the Stoneridge Final Plat, aka Windstone; 49 single-family lots on 12.7 acres located on the west side of Nile Ave. NE and north of SR-900 (FP-05-001). Council concur. (See 10.a. for resolution.) e. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional right-of-way at Meadow Ave. N. to fulfill a requirement of the Long Short Plat (SHP-05-01 1). Council concur. f. Development Services Division recommends acceptance of a deed of dedication for additional right-of-way at NE 19th St. to fulfill a requirement of the Dalpay Estates Division It Short Plat (SHP-03-125). Council concur. g. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Hoquiam Annexation and recommends a public hearing be held on 9/26/2005 to consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 20.49 acres located along the west and east sides of Hoquiam Ave. NE between 140th Ave. SE and 144th Ave. SE. Council concur. h. t inance and Information Services Department recommends approval of a resolution updating signature authorities for depositories and electronic fund transfers for the City, due to personnel changes. Council concur. (See 10.b. for resolution.) (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) i. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of a contract in the amount of $129,257.19 with URS Corporation to update the Airport Layout Plan. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. j. Transportation Systems Division recommends approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 6 to CAG-01-071, contract with Perteet, Inc. for additional work in the amount of $99,880 for the Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169) Improvements Project Phase 2. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. k. Utility Systems Division recommends that Council concur in the acceptance of the 1975 quitclaim deed for the Tonelli property consisting of 50 square feet near Logan Ave. N. and the Cedar River Waterway, and concur in the approval of a quitclaim deed for Richard Tonelli's rights to the property. An additional recommendation is that Council refer the subject of a memorial on the property for former Renton Police Chief Ang Busato and the memorial financing to Community Services Committee. 1. Utility Systems Division requests approval to transfer funds in the amount of $130,000 from the SW 7th St. Drainage Improvement Project Phase II account to the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update Project account ($50,000) and the N. 26th St. and Park Pl. N. Storm Improvement Project account ($80,000). Refer to Utilities Committee. 8. CORRESPONDENCE 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Motion regarding Akers Farms Annexation (tabled on 8/15/2005) b. Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by the Chair if further review is necessary. 1) Finance Committee: Vouchers; Morris Ave. Townhomes Fee Waiver Request 2) Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Trans -Valley Intelligent Transportation Systems Project Interlocal Agreement*; Sound Transit Phase 2 Work Plan Renton Prioritized Projects List; SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Extension Supplemental Agreement with Perteet 3) Utilities Committee: BDJS Associates Request for Utilities Oversizing Reimbursement 10. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Resolutions: a. Stoneridge, aka Windstone, Final Plat (see 7.d.) b. Updating signatures for banking transactions (see 7.h.) c. Trans -Valley Corridor interlocal agreement (see 9.b.2) 11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 12. AUDIENCE COMMENT 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION (property transaction and labor relations) 14. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) Council Chambers 6:30 p.m. Highlands Sub -Area Plan RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting September 12, 2005 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE, Council President; MARCIE PALMER; RANDY CORMAN; COUNCILMEMBERS TONI NELSON; DAN CLAWSON; DENIS LAW. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMAN DON PERSSON. CARRIED. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator; DENNIS CULP, Community Services Administrator; LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER TIM TROXEL, Police Department. PROCLAMATION A proclamation by Mayor Keolker-Wheeler was read declaring the day of National Anthem Project Day - September 14, 2005, to be "National Anthem Project Day" in the City of 9/14/2005 Renton endorsing the National Anthem Project as an opportunity to support music education and promote American traditions. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Annexation: Park Terrace, SE accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the 112th St & Anacortes Ave NE public hearing to consider the proposed expanded annexation and future zoning of 80 acres located generally between SE 112th Pl. on the north and NE 6th Pl. on the south, and between 136th Ave. SE on the west and 144th Ave. SE, if extended, on the east (Park Terrace). Don Erickson, Senior Planner, explained that the Boundary Review Board (BRB) for King County held its public hearing on the expanded annexation on 5/24/2005, for which affected property owners were notified via site posters and newspaper publications. The City was notified on 7/16/2005 that the BRB approved the expansion of the boundaries from 7.65 to 80 acres, including the abutting street right-of-ways. He noted that this is the first of two public hearings on the expanded annexation area and future zoning. Mr. Erickson stated that 112 dwelling units exist on the site, and that Fire District #25, Water District #90, Renton water, Renton sewer, and the Renton School District serve the site. He relayed that the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of $39,955 at full development, assuming 116 new dwelling units and 90 remaining units. The estimated one-time parks acquisition and development cost is $131,183, and the estimated resurfacing cost for 138th Ave. SE is $483,725. Continuing, Mr. Erickson pointed out that existing King County zoning is R-4 (four dwelling units per gross acre) generally on the west side of 138th Ave. SE, and R-6 (six dwelling units per gross acre) generally on the east side of September 12, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 302 138th Ave. SE. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the southern part of the site as Residential Single Family, and the northern tip of the site as Residential Medium Density. He reported that the proposed zoning for the site is R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) for the southern portion and R-10 (ten dwelling units per net acre) for the northern tip. Mr. Erickson concluded that the proposed annexation is generally consistent with relevant City policies and BRB objectives. Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Administrator, noted that the City has been in discussions with King County regarding the needed resurfacing of 138th Ave. SE, and will continue to pursue the matter with them. Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, described the current condition of 138th Ave. SE, and pointed out that the longer the improvements are delayed, the more costly it will be to restore the roadway in the future. Public comment was invited. David Maulding, 11221 137th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated that he wanted assurance that the R-10 zoning includes his property, as he is planning high - density development on his property. He recommended including the properties all the way down to NE loth St. in the R-10 zone. Mr. Maulding also suggested the inclusion of a turn lane on 138th Ave. SE at NE 12th St. when the roadway is repaired. He concluded by expressing his support for the annexation. In response to Stuart Whittaker's concerns, 11827 139th Ave. SE, Renton, 98056, regarding the notification for the annexation and the effect of the annexation on property owners, Mr. Erickson discussed sewer connections, taxes and fees. He noted that annexations are exempt from SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) review, and any future development will undergo an environmental review process with due notification to property owners in the affected area. Mr. Pietsch stated that while the BRB does notify citizens of its annexation expansion public hearings by site postings and newspaper publications, in the future, City staff plans to also send a letter of explanation to parties affected by the expansion. Councilman Corman further reviewed the sewer connection requirements for annexed property owners, noting that the occurrence of Local Improvement Districts (where a majority of residents approve the connection to sanitary sewers and an assessment is charged) are rare and can take place in King County as well as in Renton. Ardice Menager, 12021 140th Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated that she has been well informed of the proposed annexation via notifications and meeting attendance. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE BRB TO EXPAND THE ORIGINAL PARK TERRACE ANNEXATION TO 80 ACRES; AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF THE ZONING ORDINANCES FOR THE REZONING September 12, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 303 OF THE NON -STREET PORTIONS OF THE ENLARGED SITE TO R-8, SOUTH OF SE I t3TH ST., IF EXTENDED, AND TO R-10, NORTH OF SE 113TH ST., IF EXTENDED, CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS; AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF THE EFFECTUATION ORDINANCE; AND SET A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING ON 10/3/2005 TO FURTHER CONSIDER THE ANNEXATION AND FUTURE ZONING. CARRIED. Councilmembers Clawson and Briere suggested that staff investigate the possibility of extending the R-10 zoning further south. Mr. Pietsch stated that a Comprehensive Plan amendment will be required to extend the R-10 zoning. Mr. Erickson confirmed that previous speaker David Maulding's property is within the area of the proposed R-10 zone. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: The City of Renton is working in conjunction with King County and the State of Washington to assist victims of Hurricane Katrina. The City is participating in a Planned Day of Giving on September 15th. Donation giving stations, accepting donations on behalf of the Red Cross, will be located at the Renton Community Center, Renton City Hall, Renton Public Library, and the Highlands Library. • In conjunction with the Kennydale Neighborhood Picnic, the new play equipment at Kennydale Lions Park was dedicated last week. The City had budgeted funds to replace the play equipment, landscape around the structure, install new tables and benches, add new drainage and irrigation, and install new curbing and walkways. Starbucks awarded a $15,000 community grant to add additional features to the playground structure. • The 2005 Fall Recycling Day will be held September 17th, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at Renton Technical College's north parking lot. Community Services: Mayor Keolker-Wheeler commented that the community grant awarded by Kennydale Lions Park Starbucks for the Kennydale Lions Park playground equipment installation Playground Equipment referred to in the administrative report included a bench made of recycled Installation plastic from milk cartons used in its stores. Councilwomen Palmer acknowledged the many groups and individuals that helped with the project. AUDIENCE COMMENT Charles Doyle, 306 Morris Ave. S., Renton, 98055, announced that a debate Citizen Comment: Doyle - occurred today between the three Renton municipal court judge candidates, and Municipal Court Judge a replay of the debate will be cablecast at various times on community access Candidate Judicial Forum channel 77. Citizen Comment: Petersen - Inez Petersen, 3306 Lake Washington Blvd. N., #3, Renton, 98056, Various acknowledged the success of the judicial forum held today for the Renton municipal court judge candidates. Additionally, Ms. Petersen announced that she is now a member of the Highlands Community Association's executive board, and looks forward to working with the neighborhood association. She also asked that a tax break on utilities be considered for senior citizens during the upcoming budget discussions. September 12, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 304 Citizen Comment: Ableidinger Robert Ableidinger, 10908 SE 164th St., Renton, 98055, expressed the - Akers Farms Annexation, following concerns regarding the proposed Akers Farms Annexation: the 108th Ave SE & Puget Dr S addition of his property to the annexation area without his permission, his paying for a Local Improvement District for sewer over the past 20 years, water drainage issues on his property as a result of development to the west, and the loss of control over his property. (See page 306 for further discussion on this matter.) CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of August 15, 2005. Council concur. August 15, 2005 Latecomer Agreement: City Clerk submitted requested from Kevin M. Wyman And Durwood E. Wyman/Blood, Sewer Blood, 16540 SE 149th St., Renton, 98059, for a latecomer agreement for sewer Extension (SE 132nd St), LA- main extension along SE 132nd St. at 152nd Ave. SE. Refer to Utilities 05-003 Committee. Court Case: Jason Echon Court Case filed on behalf of Jason Echon Masangkay by Marja Starczewski, Masangkay, CRT-05-008 18520 44th Ave. W., Lynnwood, 98037, who seeks compensation for emotional distress allegedly due to violation of civil rights when arrested on 11/13/98. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services. Plat: Stoneridge, Nile Ave NE, Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the FP-05-001 Stoneridge Final Plat, aka Windstone; 49 single-family lots on 12.7 acres located on the west side of Nile Ave. NE and north of SR-900 (FP-05-001). Council concur. (See page 307 for resolution.) Development Services: Long Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Short Plat, ROW Dedication, dedication for additional right-of-way at Meadow Ave. N. to fulfill a Meadow Ave N requirement of the Long Short Plat (SHP-05-011). Council concur. Development Services: Dalpay Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of Estates Division H Short Plat, dedication for additional right-of-way at NE 19th St. to fulfill a requirement of ROW Dedication, NE 19th St the Dalpay Estates Division II Short Plat (SHP-03-125). Council concur. Annexation: Hoquiam, 140th Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department Ave SE & SE 122nd St submitted 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Hoquiam Annexation and recommended a public hearing be held on 9/26/2005 to consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 20.49 acres located between 140th Ave. SE and 144th Ave. SE and between NE 6th St. and NE 6th Pl., if extended. Council concur. Finance: Signatures for Finance and Information Services Department recommended approval of a Banking Transactions resolution updating signature authorities for depositories and electronic fund transfer for the City, due to personnel changes. Council concur. (See page 307 for resolution.) Airport: Layout Plan Update, Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of a contract in the URS Corporation amount of $129,257.19 with URS Corporation to update the Airport Layout Plan. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. CAG: 01-071, Maple Valley Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of Supplemental Hwy Improvements, Perteet Agreement No. 6 to CAG-01-071, contract with Perteet, Inc. for additional work in the amount of $99,880 for the Maple Valley Hwy. (SR-169) Improvements Project Phase 2. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. September 12, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 305 Utility: Tonelli Property Utility Systems Division recommended that Council concur in the acceptance Quitclaim Deeds, Memorial of the 1975 quitclaim deed for the Tonelli property consisting of 50 square feet for Former Renton Police near the northeast intersection of Logan Ave. N. and the Cedar River Chief Ang Busato Waterway, and concur in the approval of a quitclaim deed for Richard Tonelli's rights to the property. It was also recommended that Council refer the subject of a memorial on the property for former Renton Police Chief Ang Busato and the memorial financing to Community Services Committee. Utility: Springbrook Creek Utility Systems Division requested approval to transfer funds in the amount of Floodplain Map & N 26th $130,000 from the SW 7th St. Drainage Improvement Project Phase II account St/Park PI N Storm to the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update Project account ($50,000) Improvement Projects Fund and the N. 26th St. and Park Pl. N. Storm Improvement Project account Transfer ($80,000). Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY BRIERF., SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Transportation (Aviation) recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Committee Supplemental Agreement #3 to CAG-03-033, contract with Perteet, Inc. in the CAG: 03-033, SW 27th amount of $110,846 for construction management services for the SW 27th St/Strander Blvd Extension St./Strander Blvd. Connection Phase I, Segment 1 Project, and to authorize the Design with Perteet, Fund 317 Mayor and City Clerk to execute the supplement subject to Council's approval Budget Adjustment of a forthcoming Finance Committee recommendation that authorizes the funding. The Committee also recommended that consideration of a budget adjustment to the Transportation 317 Fund to allow funding of the SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Connection Phase I, Segment 1 Project, be referred to the Finance Committee for review and recommendation on 9/19/2005, of the following: 1) the construction contract award and cost of the lowest responsible construction bid, plus a 20% contingency (sealed bids were due 9/7/2005); 2) the construction management services agreement supplement in the amount of $110,846 (CAG-03-033); and 3) staff and other soft costs in the amount of $195,154. The Committee further recommended that if Council approves a budget adjustment for this project, that the Transportation Fund be reimbursed by bonding to be secured in 2006. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Sound Transit: Phase 2 Work Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Plan, Renton Prioritized recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to prioritize the Sound Projects List Transit Phase 2 (ST2) projects in Renton as follows: 1. New high occupancy vehicle (HOV)/Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line from Bellevue to Renton includes: Completion of Sound Move Project - N. 8th St. l IOV direct access at I-405; Transit Station and structured parking at N. 8th St. and Logan Ave. N.; and Connection to Longacres Commuter Rail Station and completion of SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. 2. HOV Direct Access at SW 27th St./SR-167 3. HOV Direct Access at Rainier/SR-167/I405 4. BRT Station at Lind Ave. SW September 12, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 306 5. BRT Station at NE 44th St. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilman Corman reported that he attended an Eastside Transportation Partnership (ETP) meeting at which this topic was discussed. He relayed the confusion experienced by many cities regarding Sound Transit's listing of the project priorities, and announced that a special meeting of the ETP will be held on September 30th to clarify the matter. *MOTION CARRIED. Transportation: Trans -Valley Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report Corridor Intelligent recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor Transportation System and City Clerk to execute the Trans -Valley Intelligent Transportation System Interlocal Agreement Project interlocal agreement for the transfer of ownership and the operation and maintenance of traffic signals and related equipment along the Trans -Valley Corridor. The Committee further recommended that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 307 for resolution.) Utilities Committee Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report regarding the request by Utility: Oversizing BDJS Associates for the Urban Crafts development utility oversizing Reimbursement Request, reimbursement. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff Urban Crafts, BDJS recommendation to approve the final costs for oversizing of utilities along Associates Olympia Ave. NE for sewer and water in the amounts of $56,769 for water and $67,279 for sewer. The Committee further recommended that Council authorize the Administration to reimburse the developer for his costs, not to exceed the final amounts approved herein. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Vice Chair Nelson presented a report recommending approval of Claim Vouchers 240557 - 241078 and two wire transfers totaling $4,242,030.86; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 59606 - 59932, one wire transfer, and 617 direct deposits totaling $2,034,386.41. MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Tabled Item Referring to the motion that was tabled at the 8/15/2005 Council meeting Annexation: Akers Farms, regarding the Akers Farms Annexation, Councilman Clawson relayed that 108th Ave SE & Puget Dr S Council received a memo from the Administration requesting concurrence in the motion without the exclusion of Mr. Ableidinger's property, and pointing out that removal of this property would set a precedent and likely have a detrimental effect on future annexation efforts. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REMOVE THE MOTION FROM THE TABLE. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE AKERS FARMS 60% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX, SUPPORT FUTURE ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN'S RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY LAND USE DESIGNATION, AND AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATION TO SUBMIT THE NOTICE OF ber 12, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 307 INTENT PACKAGE TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD AND PREPARE THE RELEVANT ORDINANCES.* In response to Councilman Corman's inquiry, Mr. Pietsch explained that staff was unsuccessful in their attempts to contact Mr. Ableidinger by telephone; however, a letter was mailed to him outlining the effects of the annexation on his property. He stated that the annexation was expanded to include the Ableidinger property since the initial annexation had signatures representing 100% of the initial property owners, and expansion to the east created a more reasonable boundary while allowing the City to bring in more developable area. Councilman Corman noted Mr. Ableidinger's concern regarding his participation in a Local Improvement District (LID) for sewer. City Attorney Larry Warren explained that the LID assessment by law cannot be more than the increase in value of the property, occasioned by the improvements. If Mr. Ableidinger paid for an assessment for sewer to his property, his property had to be increased in value equivalent to the amount he has paid over the years; therefore, he could not suffer a loss by definition. *MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: ORDINANCES Resolution #3769 A resolution was read approving the Stoneridge Final Plat, aka Windstone; Plat: Stoneridge, Nile Ave NE, approximately 12.7 acres located west of Nile Ave. NE and north of SR-900 FP-05-001 (FP-05-001). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3770 A resolution was read authorizing signature for depositories and electronic fund Finance: Signatures for transfers on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton. MOVED BY Banking Transactions LAW, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3771 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to enter into an Transportation: Trans -Valley interlocal agreement for the transfer of ownership and the operation and Corridor Intelligent maintenance of traffic signals and related equipment along the Trans -Valley Transportation System Corridor. MOVED BY PALMIER, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL Interlocal Agreement ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Robert Ableidinger, 10908 SE 164th St., Renton, 98055, expressed his Citizen Comment: Ableidinger unhappiness with Council's decision to include his property in the Akers Farms - Akers Farms Annexation, Annexation. Noting the lack of control he has over his own property, he 108th Ave SE & Puget Dr S pointed out that his property has been taken from him and used without his consent, that due process was not considered, and that his property has been devalued. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL RECESS AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 45 MINUTES TO DISCUSS PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS, PROPERTY LITIGATION, AND LABOR RELATIONS WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:54 p.m. September 12, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 308 Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:58 p.m. &X4 'ly,Wp Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann September 12, 2005 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 12, 2005 COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (Briere) COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Persson) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Clawson) PUBLIC SAFETY (Law) MON., 9/19 Gas Tax Supported Projects in Renton; 5:30 p.m. Rainier Ave. Corridor Study Briefing; Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Restoration Plan MON., 9/19 Reimbursement Resolution for S. Lake 5:00 p.m. WA Roadway & SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Connection Projects; SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Connection Project Budget Adjustment, Perteet Contract Supplement & Bid Award THURS., 9/15 Zoning Text Amendments re: Removal of 2:00 p.m. Residential Uses in the Commercial Arterial Zone MON., 9/19 TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 9/15 (Palmer) 2:30 p.m. UTILITIES (Corman) THURS., 9/15 4:00 p.m. CANCELLED Contract Supplement with Perteet for Maple Valley Hwy. Improvements; Rainier/Hardie Corridor (briefing only); Contract with URS Corporation for Airport Layout Plan Update; Bosair Lease Addendum and AcuWings Operating Permit Latecomer Agreement for Sewer Main Extension along SE 132nd St. NOTE: Conurrittee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. CITY OF RENTON WU Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler W herea,k, the study of American heritage through music inspired by important moments in our nation's history is basic to a complete education and the future of our country and its citizens; and W heYea a; school music education ensures that students learn to take pride in all for which our nation stands through the use of songs that teach history and heritage of the United States; and W hewea4; the study of music provides increased opportunities for valuable educational experiences; engages students in individual and group activities; and develops creativity, problem -solving, and critical thinking skills; and W he e,CW, the City of Renton, Washington, is concerned with maintaining and improving high school music programs for all students and teaching the importance of the historical events that created our great nation; and W h.e e-CW, the City of Renton recognizes and commends local music teachers, the National Association for Music Education, and the National Anthem Project for their commitment to enhancing the quality of music education in Renton schools and their efforts to restore American heritage and promote the significance of the national anthem; NOW, Theref'O-re; I, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim September 14, 2005, to be Natw-vw,LA nthem Praj� may in the City of Renton. Furthermore, I endorse the National Anthem Project as an opportunity to support music education and promote American traditions, and I encourage all citizens to join me in this special observance. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed this 12'h day of September, 2005. Kathy K lker-Wheeler Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6500 / FAX (425) 430-6523 R E N T O N ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer AHEAD OF THE CURVE Y PARK TERRACE ANNEXATION - EXPANDED PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF EXPANDED ANNEXATION SITE AND PROPOSED R-8 & R-10 ZONING September 12, 2005 The Boundary Review Board for King County notified the City on July 16, 2005 that the Park Terrace — Expanded Annexation, had been approved by that body. The original 7.65-acre Park Terrace Subdivision annexation site was expanded to approximately 80-acres by bringing in the so called "hook", a peninsula of unincorporated King County along 138th Avenue SE that is surrounded by the City along approximately 90% of its perimeter. The Council authorized staff to seek this expansion at their December 20, 2004 public hearing on this annexation. Because this is the first time that Council has considered the expanded annexation and because two public hearings are required on future zoning, tonight's public hearing is considered to be the first. The annexation site abuts the City on its western, northern, southern, and most of its eastern boundaries (see map on reverse side). 138th Avenue SE (Duvall Avenue NE), if extended, defines portions of its eastern and western boundaries. It is the major arterial that bisects this expanded annexation area. The expanded area includes 112 existing dwelling units and is expected to grow to 206 at full development. There are some major anticipated costs, primarily for road resurfacing, associated with the expanded annexation area. Staff estimates a cost of $483,000 for roadway resurfacing and approximately $131,183 for parks acquisition and development to served this area at build out. Council is holding tonight's public hearing to consider whether it wishes to accept the expanded 80-acre annexation site, and if so, what future zoning for it should be. Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows two designations for this area, Residential Medium Density for a small area at the northern tip of this unincorporated peninsula, and Residential Single Family for the majority of area remaining to the south. To be consistent with these land use designations the northern portion would most likely be zoned R-10, ten units per net acre, and the remaining area, R-8, eight units per net acre. Petitioners have agreed that property owners within the annexation site should assume their fair share of the City's outstanding indebtedness, and that properties within the annexation site should be zoned consistent with Renton's Comprehensive Plan. The Administration is recommending that Council: • Accept the recommendation of the Boundary Review Board to expand the original 7.65- acre Park Terrace Annexation to 80-acres by bringing in the unincorporated peninsula to the north, Park Terrace — Expanded Annexation Public Hearing 09/08/2005 2 • Authorize the Administration to prepare zoning ordinances for the rezoning of the non - street portions of the enlarged annexation site to R-8, south of SE 113th Street, if extended, and to R-10, north of SE 113th Street, if extended, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map; • Authorize the Administration to prepare an ordinance for the effectuation of the enlarged annexation, itself, and, set a second public hearing date for October 3, 2005 to further consider zoning, and if it concurs, implement the annexation by adopting the effectuation and rezoning ordinances concurrently. Park Terrace Annexation 0 600 1200 Figure 1: Vicinity Map 1 : 7200 a Economic Development. Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning G. Pi—h.Pih, AdministratorProposed Annexation Area I ugust� 5 Proposed Hoquiam Annexation Area Park Terrace Annexation - Expanded L .rst Public Hear'-, on L xparded Area and lor..,g Septe'rnhrr I_' _'/lie; a . ,r 4 ,�, , ?►.,� Exiting Cord;tlons P f cpanded area within Renton'% Porential Vmt%ation %rea location - Ne+t and east sides of 138' 4%enue SE, betwean 1361" Aaenue SE on the t%v%t and 1441" %i enue SE., if extended, on the east �Y ;¢^�a ,� ik Y� Ail(r'Ij!�My Size • ± gU acres, including abuttln l) street RN1 »t pirl s�:.a i (des 112 rxistft single-famdh deeeilings �[�"�•�'''-f L,���' ,� ii1:1� t- a A . Buundarics -This peninsula of unincorporated land abuts Renton on more than SU"o of its perimeter Background • Initially .uhr fitted as 7,65 acre annexation • At hU' � puhb, heanng Council aathon/cd ,tart to send Notice ,,t Intent to BRB where it was A:N the boundaries would be extended to the north Or ,^qa, P-- A • BRB cor.sldcr,d expanded anncxattoll at Its Puhite hearim, :tn %1ax 24. 2005 • BRB notified C sty on July 16, 2003 that It P, yo,ed SuPPoncd cxp ending onginal anncx ition by '2.3*; H,.yujam acres to ehrrinatc unincorporated peninsula x'In�>-ti,,n • T onight•s hcanne, required to consider future coning for ,:r larved area icinity Map m . � 0 Con � . � a � \ 7,� .� am2 - - }�7 `\ ( � \ \ [ \ ueld a.slcuagaudwoj uoluaaH 311S ...m M.MII' lwetaunP01101-M- rA 4 la„counp8) r'N- r rl;\ UIUOZ UOIU, r `- C�1.,�� G1Sua4 �R�IIr wn1P'1S Icuu,PIS'M - •"awl;; tmy� yiwclal- su,S � cuua Isa Imamm, �:_.�� 1 elm � - � ._.V!!=..1 pue1 urld ZIuloJ u0111.M i?u1uoZ pasodOld pue uolIeugisaQ uejd dLuoo uolu3,d jo ;.o )'m •r,;nc'a IS ?nv,k. nu! 1 3\ pr,nQ z.wit''ua p-.trunl� 1 . 'W11r,'U: V ­! "I .`1y111y,tl[ io ;Sod tumudol; �.IQ pun uunicn•.b�t ,y.r,1 �wir'uc palruiq� ] . 11JijaQ SS6.6£S 18bs snlduns Z 16`6LZS 099'L£ lS S1SOD L98'61£S 1b1.8£1S sanuaNaE lualudola.nap luawdoj1 %iG : o� pnr 11n f waa.ln J SiS,kjeud pedwj jeosi j Slaalls �UlmpnS0.1 j0 . 1s0� paleunls3 - 11e; Ol auluulpoq au l lel.lns IS IV 418£I f. S,�Lnkpeo-d - SuoIJipuoJ guilsix3 np Y-Y "I do x xrrun4 9-8 l'un deli ausuagaadwoj ilunoJ ..n Af np 9 oI diz msmwy t-H „ Ills ae S9'L irul3uo auipnpw 3S'N�. zt1 019S ",V 'N£1 Jo rra .'n 13 np 9 Inqu,ptsa-d - 9-H - puatxa-{� 13S Jo y,noS PUe 9S'1H a$:I JO .'r .if np t lenu,picajj - t-M - u1uoZ J N ae/npZ1-1• IelluaplsaH uega:-1 rlti OS,( Pura ,) N i3utuoZ Jua.ijnD pue uoIjeuaISa(j uejd duioD njuno,D EuiN uolu..,a ut onuo%v 11cwG) IS?iw: n1- oxtI SauoZ auUoS ui 'Ouideispue-j . Duilg21111311S . ° sjjc"apls put, r . s1a11nn'sgmJ . r, ju;)wdojo.,,aQ gii.�v lumoax lduaj ne.Mpeo'j Jo F) o-j pajediotjud saanimijS tfullslx3 Spin �ugSn7 1 I — SuolJIpuo,� 5.uijSix3 � _ _ .. __ ,� � ! _ I JQ i rl. r 7v f"r� ✓: .'S ,�J � C � � � � � T� /� - r CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: September 12, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION Through our emergency coordination procedures, the City of Renton is working in conjunction with King County and the State of Washington to assist victims of Hurricane Katrina. As you may have heard, the State of Washington is undergoing a three-phase planning process, known as Operation Evergreen, to help people who have been displaced by Hurricane Katrina. The State of Washington may possibly receive guests from the Gulf Coast as soon as mid -September. People who want to donate time, large bulk goods, or services may call the State's Operation Evergreen hotline at 1-800- 941-2930. Along with many cities around the region, the City of Renton is participating in a Planned Day of Giving on Thursday, September 151h. Donation "giving" stations, accepting donations on behalf of the Red Cross, will be located at the following public facilities in Renton: Renton Community Center, Renton City Hall, Renton Public Library, and Highlands Library. The giving stations will be operating during normal business hours for each of those facilities. • Congratulations to Alex Pietsch, Renton's Economic Development, Neighborhoods, and Strategic Planning Administrator who was named to the 2005 Puget Sound Business Journal's 40 under 40 roster. Honorees were selected based on their entrepreneurial spirit and their contribution to the region through their business and community involvement. • 'The State Primary is Tuesday, September 20th, and the General Election will be held on Tuesday, November 8th. To learn about the primary process, polling locations, or the election process, please visit the King County Elections Information at www.metrokc.gov or call the Renton City Clerk's Office at 425-430-6510. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • The swimming season at the Henry Moses Aquatic Center closed on Monday, September 5th. Revenue was generated from paid admissions, swim lessons, classes, rentals, and concessions. If you used the new facility this summer, please help staff evaluate services at the Aquatic Center by filling out an -online survey, available on the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us. Administrative Report Page 2 A major renovation project is underway on the Riverview Park bridge, located at 1719 Maple Valley Hwy. The parking lot to the park will not be available for public use. The park remains open to the public, but will only be accessible via the Cedar River Trail. The project's estimated completion date is December 15, 2005. If you have any question, please call Bill Rasmussen, Project Manager, at 425- 430-6617 In conjunction with the Kennydale Neighborhood Picnic, the new play equipment at Kennydale Lions Park was dedicated last week. The City had budgeted funds to replace the Kennydale Play Equipment, landscape around the structure, install new tables and benches, add new drainage and irrigation, and install new curbing and walkways. Starbucks awarded a $15,000 community grant to add additional features to the playground structure. Many members of the Kennydale Neighborhood Association helped put together the structure under the guidance of a certified installer. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, & STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT • Jimi Hendrix's childhood home was moved in two pieces over the weekend from its temporary location on South Jackson Street in Seattle to its new one in Renton (3612 N.E. Fourth St.), across the street from Hendrix's grave at Greenwood Memorial Park. The Jimi Hendrix Foundation plans to turn the house into a museum and is leasing the property for $1 a year. The City looks forward to the timely renovation of the house as its owner continues to meet the conditions of his City permit allowing the house move. PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • The Sound Transit Finance Committee will meet on September 15 and the Sound Transit Board will meet on September 22 to consider the proposal to amend Sound Move in order for Sound Transit to provide funding to two City of Renton projects: the Rainier Ave. South/Hardie Ave. SW Corridor improvements project, and the SW 27th St./Strander Blvd. Extension project. The King County Elliott Bridge project has been completed and opened to the public. Restoration of this access route across the Cedar River will provide relief in Renton by removing some of the additional traffic that was using NE 3rd and 4th Street down to Sunset Blvd. North and the Maple Valley Hwy during the bridge closure. The 2005 Fall Recycling Day will be held Saturday, September 17th, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at Renton Technical College's north parking lot. This one -day event gives residents an opportunity to recycle large items and hard -to -recycle materials at one convenient place. For details about acceptable materials, visit the City's website or call 425-430-7398. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: Submitting Data: For Agenda of: September 12, 2005 Dept/Div/Board. AJLS/City Clerk Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton, City Clerk, x6502 Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Latecomer's Agreement Request for SE 132nd St. Sewer Correspondence.. Extension at 152nd Ave. SE (Kevin Wyman and Ordinance ............. Durwood Blood, Petitioners) File: LA-05-003 Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Verification of Application Sufficiency Study Sessions...... Latecomer's Agreement Request with Exhibits Information......... Recommended Action: Refer to Utilities Committee Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Amount Budgeted....... Total Project Budget N/A Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Transfer/Amendment....... Revenue Generated......... Share Total SUMMARY OF ACTION: Kevin M. Wyman and Durwood E. Blood, 16540 SE 149`h St., Renton, 98059, requests a latecomer's agreement for a sewer extension along SE 132nd St. at 152nd Ave. SE. The Planning/Building/Public Works Department has verified the petition, the property ownership, cost figures, legal descriptions and maps. The latecomer's agreement application fee of $1,000 has been received. The total cost is estimated at $60,290.92. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Grant preliminary approval for the SE 132nd St. latecomer's agreement request for a period of one year, and authorize staff to forward the preliminary assessment roll to the City Clerk for notification of affected property owners. cc: Karen McFarland, Utility Systems Div., x7209 Reference: RMC: Title Ix, Chapter 4 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/ AUG 3 0 2005 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECEIVED "u CITY CLERK'S OFFICE o� M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 30, 2005 TO: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk FROM: Karen McFarland x7209 )�� SUBJECT: Verification of Latecomer Application Wyman -Blood Sewer Extension, LA-05-003 We have received and reviewed the above referenced application and find it complete and valid. After reviewing the engineering plans and the estimated cost data that has been submitted, staff believes that the amount covered by the latecomer's is: Cl $20,000.00 or less. V/"between $20,000.00 and $100,000.00. O greater than $100,000.00. Please place this request for a Latecomer on Council's ZMS agenda. I will contact the City Council Liaison to schedule a briefing for Council on this latecomer request. Finally, please add the following Department File Number to the City Clerk Card File indexing information PRM 27- 00 3 0 I will draft the legal description of the latecomer's boundary and a preliminary latec me 's boundary 1 p and will deliver the notice to be mailed to all owners of record by ip 240 . P:\PRM-27 - Assessment Districts Prom 1994 and ForNN ard\Latecomer_templates\clerk_appmemo.doc L q- o5-oa3 Wednesday, July 27, 2005 Kevin M Wyman & Durwood E Blood 16540 SE 149"' St Renton WA 98059 (206) 419-0349 (866) 817-3376 fax To: Mayor Keolker-Wheeler & City Council c/o City Clerk City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way, 7t" Floor Renton WA 98055 Subject: Wyman — Blood Sewer Extension Near corner of 152°d Ave SE and SE 132" d St Honorable Mayor and members of the Renton City Council: Ci?-Y OF f3t5^NTON v LIVE �. iTy C,i.., Hk"S OFFICIE On behalf of Kevin M Wyman and Durwood E Blood, we respectfully request a latecomer agreement be drawn up so that adjacent properties will be required to share in the cost of the sewer main extension along SE 132" d St. This extension will allow Mr. Blood and Mr. Wyman to each build one single family residence without the need for a previously approved on site sewage system. The property that will benefit in the future from the sewer main extension is located along the north side of SE 132" d St along the proposed extension and as shown on the attached vicinity map. Attached hereto are the estimated cost data and inventory for the installation, the legal description of our properties, and the King County Tax account number for the benefited property. Upon administrative acceptance of our application, we will submit the applicable processing fee. Sincerely, �K-evin M Wyman Legal Description for Wyman — Blood Developer Extension Project: LOTS 3 AND 4, CEDAR CREST ESTATES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME 95 OF PLATS, PAGE 54, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Wyman — Blood Developer Extension Project: List of King County Tax Account Numbers of Benefited Properties: 1423059003 A WA Scbweim & Associates, pllc Civil Engineering, Project Management & Consulting 1945 South 375th Street Phone: (253) 815-1700 Federal Way, Washington 98003 Fax: (253)815-1701 bselm eiklrilcomeast.net SE 132tnd STREET - PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION SA PROJECT NO: 05026 LATECOMERS AGREEMENT VICINITY MAP y +s Ff�t f r� ts� s fast t Ems --------------- ---1423b59003===_____— ------------------- _ _ _ v ♦cvvccv`ccvv�c.-c a c _c-v^ccc°o cvv c•° 36 I i LOT 1 I LOT 2 w( I � c°cvvn°ecv vvccvcv cvv IJ x OM ccvvccvacc cc vac000 vcvo�v„cvv vyvocvcc cAvo - - - - 7o cvcvvcovvo vvv v°vovo°v- ° voo°o vvcv vc o v c v o °coo v (�. r---- \ o ovvc vc6cov v ov ccov ° o v ti \ I \ I I I I _ _ _ = BENEFITED PROPERTIES "'°° '-,' ° DEVELOPERS PROPERTY — — — — LATECOMER BOUNDARY SCALE 1 " = 100' 100' 0 50' 100' 200' ESTIMATED COST DATA AND INVENTORY FOF _)TENTIAL LATECOMER RECOVERY SUBJECT: {lel- �� r; r j�,, CITY PROJECT NUMBERS: WTR - WWP - PROJECT NAME: SWP - TRO - TED - TO: City of Renton FROM: Plan Review Sectionrsi��. Planning/Building/Public Works I S� �I<r.•4 1055 South Grady Way, 6 h Floor Renton, WA 98055 DATE: #3 Estimated Cost Data and Inventory for Improvements Per the request of the City of Renton. the following information is furnished concerning costs for improvements proposed to be installed for the above -referenced project. WATER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Length ize Type L.F. of " WATERMAIN L.F. of " WATERMAIN L.F. of " WATERMAIN L.F. of " WATERMAIN EACH of " GATE VALVES EACH of " GATE VALVES EACH of " GATE VALVES EACH of " FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES (Cost of Fire Hydrants must be listed separately) Engineering Design Costs City Permit Fees Washington State Sales Tax TOTAL COST FOR WATER SYSTEM IITARY SEWER SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS: .'gth Size I ype 34 L.F. of _ �r j� SEWER MAIN — — L.F. of. SEWER MAIN L.F. of " SEWER MAIN EACH of DIAMETER OF MANHOLES Engineering Design Costs City Permit Fees Washington State Sales Tax (Sewer Stub — line between sewer main and private property line) TOTAL COST FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM $ 1933.9& AMMINUM ��1r - STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Lengtn 5tze Type L.F. of " STORM LINE L.F. of " STORM LINE L.F. of " STORM LINE EA of " STORM INLET EA of " STORM CATCHBASIN EA of " STORM CATCHBASIN Engineering Design Costs $ City Permit Fees Washington State Sales Tax TOTAL COST FOR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM $ STREET IMPROVEMENT: (Including Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Asphalt Pavement and Street Lighting). SIGNALIZATION: (Including Eng. Design Costs, City Permit Fees, WA State Sales Tax). STREET LIGHTING: (Including Eng. Design Costs, City Permit Fees, WA State Sales Tax) signatory nam9( (day phone #) IGN,,VrORE) (Signatory must be authorized agent or owner of subject development) P:1Cunent Projects1atecomerUpdateUlandout\3_CostData_Estimated. doc SE 132ND STREET - PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION A PORTION OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SEC. 14, TWP 23N., RGE. 5E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON EX $SMu "l RE SAT E2 CITY OF RI:NTON COUNCIL A(;f:NI)A BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/Div/Board.. AJT.S/City Clerk Staff Contact... Bonnie Walton SUBJI:C"I: CR"T-05-008; Court Case Jason Echon Masangkay vs. City of Renton; Renton Police Department; Renton Police Department Memher K.C. Watkins; Unknown Renton Police Officers; Ron S. I laiman; Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons I:XIIIBIts: Summons and Complaint FOR AGENDA OF: 9/12/2005 AGENDA STATUS: Consent.... X Puhlic I tearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance... Resolution... Old Business....... New Business...... Study Session.... Other.... RI:C0N1MI:NDI-D ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept...... Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services Finance Dept.... Other........... FISCAL IMPACT: - I:xpcnditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted........ Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Summons and Verified Complaint for Money Damages filed in United States District Court Western District of Washington at Seattle by Marja Starczewski, 18520 44th Ave. W., Lynnwood, 98037, on behalf of Jason Echon Masangkay who seeks compensation for severe emotional distress allegedly due to violation of civil rights when arrested on 1 1/13/1998. �[Ty OF RENTON -:AO 440 (Rev. 3/01) Summons !n a Civii action CITY CLERK'S OFFIQE ��ITiD STATES DISTRICT COURT -Handlkli•ve��1 6y L -�'J Snrvl rr_ _ District Of _ � 1 SUMMONS I-1 A CIVIL CASE V. CASE w) --� 10 _ , y - TO, Name and address of Defendant) IV, SS S. 6,camPY WA- I'll, YOU ARE HEREBY SUN VIONED and required to serve on PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY (name and address) Marja Starczewski Attorney At Law 18520 44th Ave. W Lynnwood, WA 98037 ce NtkJ A-hf 111 ra"Or �tsk i�1cvna 6pu rnt an answer to the complaint which is served on you with this summons, within 1 f L'( '/ days after service of this summons on you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. Any answer that you serve on the parties to this action must be filed with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable period of time after service. CLERK f // L/ J (By) DEPUTY CLERK DATE -_ jjj/// "'IIIJJJ CIS OF RENTON AL10 18 2005 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE JASON ECHON MASANGKAY, Plaintiff vs. The City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation, City of Renton Police Department, K.C. Watkins, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Renton Police Department, "John Doe 14" unknown officers of the Renton Police -Department, individually and in their official capacity as a members of the Renton Police Department, Ron S. Haiman, individually and as a member of the Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons (SCRAP), a Washington Nonprofit Corporation, Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons (SCRAP), a Washington Nonprofit Corporation. I No: VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 COMES NOW the plaintiff, Jason E. Masangkay, and, for cause of action against the defendants above -named states as follows; VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY LAW OFFICES OF MARJA STARCZEWSKI, PLLC DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18520 - 44`h Ave W. Lynnwood, WA 98037 1' (425)640-2430 I. Jurisdiction and Venue. 1.1 Plaintiff has, at all times relevant hereto, been a resident of the Western District of Washington. 1.2 The acts complained of occurred in the Western District of Washington. 1.3 Defendants are individuals who, at the time referred to in this complaint, were acting "under color of law", as police officers of the City of Renton Police Department, and as Jail personnel and/or guards of the King County Jail, and as a Public Defender, with S.C.R.A.P., an agency within King County, Washington. Remaining defendants are entities, which have a policy and custom of the conduct complained of herein, which conduct does not fall within the state's waiver of sovereign immunity. 1.4 Plaintiff was born on August 10, 1984, he turned 18 years old on August 10, 2002. This suit is filed within 3 years after the plaintiff's 10`h birthday. _1.5 This suit is brought under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, specifically, section 42 USC § 1983. Jurisdiction is properly in this court under the general federal jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(3), which grants jurisdiction to redress violations of federal laws that provide for equal rights of citizens. II. Facts. 2.1 Plaintiff Jason E. Masangkay was 14 years old at the time of the incident in question, on November 13, 1998. VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY LAW OFFICES OF MARJA STARCZEWSKI, PLLC DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18520 — 44" Ave W. Lynnwood, WA 98037 2' (425) 640-2430 2.2 Plaintiff had been looking at videos or games at the Renton Fred Meyer store, with two other boys whom he had just met, when the two boys disappeared. Surprised, plaintiff went to look for the two boys, and left the "electronics" section of Fred Meyer, holding one or two of the videos or games that he had been looking at. When he realized the two other boys were not there, plaintiff turned to return to the "electronics" section of the store. At that point, plaintiff was tackled, thrown to the ground, and severely bruised about his neck and face. 2.3 Renton police came on the scene, when plaintiff was being detained at Fred Meyer. 2.4 Upon information and belief, the officer who came on the scene was K.C. Watkins, whose full name is unknown to plaintiff. 2.5 Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this complaint when the full name of the responding officers is known to him. 2.6 The Renton Police Officer asked plaintiff his age, and was informed that the plaintiff was 14 years old. 2.7 The plaintiff was winded from being thrown to the floor, and had difficulty catching his breath. The Renton Police Officers did not investigate the scene, did not wait until plaintiff could recover his breath to tell what happened, and immediately took plaintiff to the police station. 2.8 While plaintiff was at the police station, and later while he was at a King County detention facility (upon information and belief, possibly "juvenile hall"), plaintiff was not given any medical attention for his ctits and bruises, and was not VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY LAW OFFICES OF MARJA STARCZEWSKI, PLLC DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18520 - 44th Ave W. Lynnwood, WA 98037 3' (425) 640-2430 permitted to see his parents or speak to his parents. Plaintiff was not allowed to make any telephone calls or see his parents for three days and nights, while he was frightened and in pain in the detention facility. ri-T t-Ate;VC,1,' 2.9 Plaintiff was assigned a Public Defense attorneys d "f,iw-as Darby Nicole rDomb. He was then re -assigned or transferred to another attorney, who, upon information and belief, was Ron Haiman. Upon information and belief, both attorneys were with "SCRAP", the "Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons", which is a Washington Nonprofit Corporation. 2.10 Neither Darby DuComb nor Ron Haiman ever asked that plaintiff what happened at Fred Meyer, and they never investigated the incident. f,�,,1, I j,"— , f' 4 / 2.11 The first attorney, who, upon information and belief, was Darby DuComb, told plaintiff that he would be in prison for 20 years, if he will not plead guilty. -2.12 The second attorney, who, upon information and belief, was Ron Haiman, had a meeting with the plaintiff's parents, and then immediately had the plaintiff plead guilty. 2.13 The second attorney, who, upon information and belief, was Ron Haiman, told the plaintiff that he had only 7 minutes to plead, and that if he pleads "guilty" that would only be "paperwork", and there would be no prison or jail time, but only community service. He put enormous pressure upon the plaintiff, by counting out the minutes (time), out loud, to increase the pressure. Finally, plaintiff shouted that he did not want to be in prison, and agreed to the plea. VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY LAW OFFICES OF MARJA STARCZEWSKI, PLLC DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18520 — 44"' Ave W. 4 Lynnwood, WA 98037 (425) 640-2430 2.14 Plaintiff was then sentenced to 9 months, which was never a part of the plea discussions with his counsel. 2.15 Plaintiff was later pardoned, in full, by the Governor. III. First Cause of Action; Civil Rights Violation. 3.1 Plaintiff reiterates paragraphs 1.1 through 2.15. 3.2 Acting under "color of law", the named individual officers of the Renton Police Department violated the plaintiff's civil rights by performing a perfunctory arrest, not investigating the incident, and by keeping plaintiff under arrest in detention for three days without a telephone call, without counsel, and without any contact with his parents. 3.3 When plaintiff's parents called the police department and jail, they were told that they could not see the plaintiff. This continued for three days after the arrest. 3.4 The City of Renton and the Renton Police Department did apparently have a policy or custom of not allowing parents to see or speak with their children who were under arrest, and of not allowing the child a phone call home, and of not providing medical treatment for the wounds, cuts, and bruises that the child had suffered. These practices, policies or customs deprived the plaintiff of his civil rights. - VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY LAW OFFICES OF MARJA STARCZEWSKI, PLLC DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18520 — 44" Ave W. Lynnwood, WA 98037 5' (425) 640-2430 IV. Second Cause of Action; Civil Rights Violation; Failure to Provide Counsel; 4.1 Plaintiff re -iterates paragraphs 1.1 through 2.15, and 3.2 through 3.4. 4.2 In addition to being deprived of counsel while initially arrested, plaintiff was deprived of counsel by SCRAP, the Society of Counsel Representing Accused Persons, the individual attorneys, and the City of Renton, which assigned the attorneys' to plaintiff. 4.3 The information given to plaintiff, that he was facing 20 years in prison, was false. This was false information given by Ms. DuComb, or another person from SCRAP, designed to coerce the plaintiff into pleading guilty. 4.4 The information given to plaintiff, that upon pleading guilty he would not face any prisons or jail time and would merely entail "paperwork and community service was false. This was false information given by Mr. Haiman, or another person from SCRAP, designed to coerce the plaintiff into pleading guilty. 4.5 The tactics of counting out 7 minutes, out loud, and limiting the time that the plaintiff had to consider a plea to only 7 minutes, were tactics of coercion, and were employed by Mr. Haiman to coerce the plaintiff into pleading guilty. 4.6 Throughout the proceedings, the plaintiff had no competent assistance of counsel, was not informed of his rights or of the probably outcome of a trial. 4.7 Plaintiff was therefore deprived of his right to counsel, within the meaning of the 6a' and 14`h Amendments to the US Constitution, which is a violation of the plaintiff's civil rights. VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY LAW OFFICES OF MARJA STARCZEWSKI, PLLC DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18520 - 441h Ave W. Lynnwood, WA 98037 6' (425) 640-2430 4.8 Plaintiff has suffered, and continues to suffer, severe emotional distress due to having been incarcerated for 9 months for a crime he did not commit. The Governor's pardon, while clearing the plaintiff's record, cannot wipe away the trauma of being forced and coerced into pleading guilty, and losing 9 months of a 14 year -old child's life. 4.9 Plaintiff has no adequate remedies available under State law. Relief Requested; Plaintiff prays for relief as follows; 1. Monetary damages against the defendants, in an amount that is not yet ascertained, but which is estimated for purposes of this pleading at $60,000. 2. Monetary relief in amounts consistent with Trezevant v. Tampa, 741 F.2d 336 (CAI 1 1984) as applied to confinement deemed an undue loss of liberty. 3. Plaintiff's costs and Reasonable attorney's fees for the prosecution of this action. 4. Any and all other remedy the Court may deem necessary and just. Respectfully submitted, August 8, 2005; Marja Starczewski, WSBA 26111 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY LAW OFFICES OF MARJA STARCZEWSKI, PLLC DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 18520 - 44th Ave W. Lynnwood, WA 98037 �' (425) 640-2430 Verification of Complaint. I, Jason Echon Masangkay, hereby certify that I have read the complaint to which this Verification is attached. I believe the complaint is true and correct, to the best of my knowledge, and upon information and belief. Signed in f6, Washington, on this August , 2005; d:�� �i. 1,7 Jason E. Masangkay STATE OF WASHINGTON SS: COUNTY OF KING On this 19 day of August, 2005, before me personally appeared Jason E. Masangkay, to me known, or sufficiently identified, to be the individual who executed the foregoing -instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my hand and official seal the day and yF.r list a VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR MONEY DAMAGES under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Notary Publi6, in and for t e State of Washington, Residing atI. I Commission Expires on LAW OFFICES OF MARJA STARCZEWSKI, PLLC 18520 — 441h Ave W. Lynnwood, WA 98037 8' (425) 640-2430 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building /Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact...... Juliana Fries x:7278 Subject: STONERIDGE (A.K.A. WINDSTONE) FINAL PLAT; File No. LUA 05-001 12.7 acres located at the west side of Nile Ave NE and north of SR-900. Exhibits: 1. Resolution and legal description 2. Staff report and recommendation Recommended Action: Council concur Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Amount Budgeted....... Total Project Budget N/A SUMMARY OF ACTION: Al #: For Agenda of: September 12, 2005 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. X Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Approvals: Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... Other ............... Transfer/Amendment...... . Revenue Generated......... City Share Total Project.. The recommendation for approval of the referenced final plat is submitted for Council action. Stoneridge (a.k.a. Windstone) divides 12.7 acres into 49 single-family residential lots with water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, street lighting, curb and gutter, sidewalks and street improvements. Design and construction of utilities, lighting and pavement will be approved, accepted or deferred (and a security device posted) as required through the Board of Public Works prior to recording the plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat by the King County Hearing Examiner will be met prior to recording of the plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve Stoneridge (a.k.a. Windstone) Final Plat, LUA 05-001, FP, with the following conditions and adopt the resolution. a) All mitigation fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. b) All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of the City staff prior to the recording of the plat. X X CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING FINAL PLAT (STONERIDGE, A.K.A. WINDSTONE; FILE NO. LUA-05-001FP). WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Pubiic Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is proper and advisable and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools, schoolgrounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHTNGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION He The final plat approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth RESOLUTION NO. (The property, consisting of approximately 12.7 acres, is located west of Nile Avenue NE and north of SR 900) is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Pubhc Works Department dated August 10, ZOOS. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1130:8/11/05:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2 EXHIBIT A Stone Ridge (AKA Windstone) Legal Descriptions Parcel A Lot X of King County Boundary line Adjustment No. LOOL0089, recorded under Recording No. 20020702900007, in King County, Washington. Parcel B: The North 165 feet of the South 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT county roads; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lot 2, King County Short Plat No. 486017, recorded under Recording No. 8703039001, described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 2: thence South 87'49'15" East along the North line of said Lot, a distance of 97.38 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 2'10'45" West a distance of 158.13 feet to the South line of said Lot 2 and a point on a curve concave Northwesterly, the radial center of which bears North 19'44'42" West; thence Northeasterly along the South line of said Lot 2 and the arc of said curve having a radius of 95.00 feet, through a central angle of 31'38'59", a distance of 52.48 feet to a point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Southeasterly, the radial center of which bears South 51'23'41" East; thence continuing Northeasterly along said South line of said Lot 2 and the arc of said curve having a radius of 65.00 feet, through a central angle of 53'34'26", a distance of 60.78 feet: thence continuing along the South line of said Lot 2, South 87'49'15" East a distance of 223.23 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot; thence North 1*24*12" East along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 100.02 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot; thence North 87'49'15" West along the North line of said Lot a distance of 315.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning. (also known as Lot Y of King County Boundary line Adjustment No. LOOL0089, recorded under Recording No. 20020702900007.) Parcel C: Lot 1, King County Short Plat No. 486017, recorded under Recording No. 8703039001, and amended by affidavit of correction recorded under Recording No. 6706260950, in King County, Washington, being a portion of the South half of the South half of the South half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the following described property in accordance with decree quieting title in King County Superior Court Cause No. 86-2-22118-2 entered on March 23. 1987: the South 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 840.50 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the North 165 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion of lying within the South half of the South half of the South half of said subdivision; and EXCEPT county roads. Parcel D: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; thence North 65 feet along the East line of said Section 3; thence West 670.2 feet; thence South 65 feet to the South line of said Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 3, thence East along said South line, 670.2 feet to the Point of Beginning', EXCEPT roads. EXHIBIT A Stone Ridge (AKA Windstone) Vicinity Map SE MAY �gLLE Y RD w m SE 100TH ST — Q SE 102TH ST GO Z SE 105TH PL > w Q � J W -1 > Q Q > SITE 0 NE SUNSET gLv � U) R�NI SSA() AH n RD S'Q 9 Q a 5MAY VALLEY OO COUNTY PARK X o Centre 33701 9th Avenue South Federal Way, WA. 98003 N (253) 661-1901 NOT TO ��®� P Pointe SCALE s V Surveying Stone Ridge (AKA Windstone) 33701 9th Avenue South Federal Way, WA. 98003 A.— (253) 661-1901 NOT TO SCALE o Surveying DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION BUILDING/PLANNING/PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF RENTON STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS APPLICANT: LOCATION: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: RECOMMENDATION: Wayne Potter Stoneridge (A.K.A. Windstone) Final Plat. File: LUA 05-OO1FP West side of Nile Ave NE & North of SR-900. Section 03, Twp. 23 N., Rng 5 E. Final Plat for 49 single-family residential lots with water, sanitary sewer, storm, street and lighting. Approve With Conditions FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION Having reviewed the record documents in this matter, staff now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Wayne Potter, filed a request for approval of Stoneridge (A.K.A. Windstone), a 49-lot Final Plat. 2. The yellow file containing all staff reports, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit No. 1. 3. The Department of Development Services (DDES), the King County responsible official, issued a Determination on Non -Significance -Mitigated on November 3, 2000 for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at the west side of Nile Ave NE & north of SR-900. The new plat is located in Section 03, Twp. 23 N., Rng 5 E. 6. The subject site is comprised of 4 parcels totaling 12.7 acres. 7. The Preliminary Plat (LOOP3008) was approved by the King County Hearing Examiner on June 5, 2001. 8. The preliminary plat was approved by King County under R-4 standards however upon annexation to the City of Renton it was zoned as Residential 5 DU/AC (R-5) and subsequently rezoned to City of Renton R-4 when the R-5 zoning was eliminated. 9. The Preliminary Plat was subject to a number of conditions as a result of both environmental review and plat review. The applicant complied with the Renton requirements for compliance with the conditions imposed by the King County Hearing Examiner. 9.1. Compliance with all platting provisions of Title 19 of the King County Code. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall complete the plat required street, utility and drainage improvements per the approved preliminary plat. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Renton Subdivision Regulations for final plat approval procedures. Streets, utilities, drainage improvements, signage and lighting are under construction and will be approved, accepted or deferred (and a security device posted) as required through the Board of Public Works prior to recording the plat. In accordance with Renton Subdivision Regulations, all departments with an interest in the matter have reviewed the final plat. 9.2. All persons having an ownership interest in the subject property shall sign on the face of the final plat a dedication that includes the language set forth in King County Council Motion No. 5952. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Renton Subdivision Regulations for final plat approval procedures. The applicant complied with the Final Plat Procedures, established on the Renton Subdivision Regulations. 9.3. The plat shall comply with the base density and minimum density of the R-4 zone classification. All lots shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements of the R4 zone classification or shall be generally as shown on the face of the approved preliminary plat, except that minor revisions to the plat that do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Department of Development and Environmental Services. Any changes to the plat design which are mandated by the conditions which follow shall also be permitted. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written for density and dimension requirements. The applicant shall provide a copy of the R-4 zone dimensional requirements with the final plat application. Minor revisions to the plat that do not result in substantial changes may be approved at the discretion of the Development Services Division. The preliminary plat was approved by King County under R-4 standards and complied with county R-4 standards. However upon annexation to the City of Renton it was zoned as Residential 5 DU/AC (R-5) and subsequently rezoned to City's R-4 when the R-5 zoning was eliminated. 9.4. The applicant must obtain final approval from the King County Health Department. Existing septic tanks on the site must be properly abandoned prior to final Health Department approval. Renton Requirement: The applicant must obtain final approval from the King County Health Department prior to recording of the plat. Construction of the new ,sewer main system for the plat. per City of Renton requirements, must be completed and accepted by the City prior to recording of the plat. The sewer mains were installed and accepted by the public works inspector. Documentation of proper removal on all on -site septic tanks has been provided prior to final plat recording. 9.5. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with the King County Road Standards established and adopted by Ordinance No. 11187, as amended. Renton Requirement: All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with City of Renton requirements, with the exception of street pavement widths for the new streets. The new streets can be constructed with the pavement widths approved with the preliminary plat. The pavement thickness must be a minimum of 4 "of asphalt over 6" of crushed rock. Rolled curb is not acceptable, thus vertical curb will be required. Any streets narrower than 32 feet in width must be posted for no parking along one side of the street. Any street narrower than 28 feet must be posted for no parking along both sides of the street. Street lighting must be provided to meet the minimum street lighting levels established in Renton Code. All streets within the plat will be subject to naming specified by the Development Services Division. The streetlights along the arterial streets must be constructed per City of Renton standards, and turned over to the City for ownership and maintenance. The streetlights on the residential streets can be constructed as a City system, or as a Puget Sound Energy (PSE) system. The maintenance and electrical bills to PSE would be the responsibility of the homeowners' association for a PSE system. The streets were designed and installed per City of Renton standards. All public streets have 32 feet of pavement, vertical curb, gutter and 5-foot sidewalks. All streetlights were designed and installed per City standards. 9.6. The applicant must obtain the approval of the King County Fire Protection Engineer, to demonstrate compliance with the fire hydrant, water main and fire flow standards of Chapter 17.08 of the King County Code. plat. Renton Requirement: The applicant must obtain the approval of the Renton Fire Department for the fire hydrants and water main system for the preliminary plat. The applicant shall work with Water District #90 to demonstrate that the minimum fire flow requirements of one hydrant with a minimum fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute within 300 feet of each new lot are satisfied. All such hydrants must conform to City of Renton standards, including stortz fittings. Sprinklers for the proposed residences shall be required if fare flow does not meet the above standards for minimum fire flow. Fire Department has reviewed and approved the design of Stoneridge 1 (A.K.A. Windstone). Fire Department will also inspect and approve installation of improvements prior to recording of the plat. 9.7. Final plat approval shall require full compliance with drainage provisions set forth in King County Code 9.04. Compliance may result in reducing the number and/or location of lots as shown on the preliminary approved plat. Preliminary review has identified the following conditions of approval, which represent portions of the drainage requirements. All other applicable requirements in KCC 9.04 and the Surface Water Design Manual must also be satisfied during engineering and final review. a) Drainage plans and analysis shall comply with the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). DDES approval of the drainage and roadway plans is required prior to any construction. b) Current standard plan notes and ESC notes, as established by DDES Engineering Review, shall be shown on the engineering plans. c) The following note shall be shown on the final recorded plat: "All building downspouts, footing drains, and drains from all impervious surfaces such as patios and driveways shall be connected to the permanent storm drain outlet as shown on the approved construction drawings # on file with DDES and/or the Department of Public Works. This plan shall be submitted with the application of any building permit. All connections of the drains must be constructed and approved prior to the final building inspection approval. For those lots that are designated for individual lot infiltration systems, the systems shall be constructed at the time of the building permit and shall comply with plans on file. " d) Core Requirement No. 1: Discharge at the Natural Location The applicant has received approval for a requested diversion ofsurface water flows within the project, under Drainage Adjustment LOOV0062. The conditions of approval of this drainage adjustment shall be satisfied during the design and review of the project engineering plans. e) Core Requirement No. 3: Runoff Control. To mitigate for downstream capacity issues, the applicant shall provide Level Three flow control, as outlined in the KCSWDM The size of the proposed drainage tract may have to increase to accommodate the required detention storage volumes and water quality facilities. The stormwater facility shall be located in a separate tract and dedicated to King County, unless portions of the drainage tract are used for required recreation space in accordance with KCC21 A.14.180. As specified in Section 5.1.1 of the KCSWDM, roof drain storm water shall be infiltrated or dispersed within the lot area if the soil conditions are favorable. Infiltration of storm water for both lot areas and roadway improvements is recommended if determined to be feasible. A geotechnical report shall be provided to evaluate soil conditions, seasonal depth to groundwater and other design requirements as outlined in the KCSWDM. fl Core Requirement No. 4: Conveyance Systems. As part of the applicant's submittal for engineering plan review, upstream flows shall be analyzed to determine whether there is adequate conveyance capacity in the existing 18-inch CMP that crosses northwest under 148th Avenue SE into Tract C in the eastern portion of the site. g) Core Requirements No. 8: Water Quality. The project is required to meet the basic water quality requirements of the 1998 KCSWDM. h) Special Requirements No. 2: Foodplain Delineation. Because a wetland and two stream are located on the property, a floodplain analysis shall be performed. The 100 year floodplain boundaries shall be shown on the final engineering plans and recorded plat. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. The note on the final plat shall refer to the Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department instead of the King County agencies. Please note that the City of Renton does not assume maintenance responsibilities for the drainage facilities for new subdivisions. The homeowners' association will be responsible for the ownership and maintenance of these facilities. The development is in compliance with City of Renton drainage provisions. a) The project was designed and constructed in accordance to the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. b) Erosion Control was provided during construction of the plat improvements. c) A note has been placed on the face of the plat referencing connection of building downspouts and footing drains to the storm system design approved by the City of Renton. d) The pond discharge is to an on -site wetland and maintains the discharge to a natural location. e) Level 3 detention was provided to control runoff. f) The conveyance system analysis was completed and the existing culvert on 148th Ave SE will be upsized to provide capacity for future developments (this culvert is within King County Right -of -Way). g) Basic water quality has been provided. h) The 100-year floodplain is shown in the plans as well in the final plat. 9.8. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the 1993 King County Road Standards (KCRS): including the following requirements: a) Road A shall be improved as an urban neighborhood collector between 148th Avenue SE and Road C, and as an urban sub collector west of Road C. The design of the subject plat shall be modified so that the lots in the plat will not take individual direct access from the neighborhood collector portion of Road A. This modification to the design may result in the relocation of the proposed alignment of Road A. b) Roads C and D, at a minimum, shall be designed to the urban, sub access street standard. c) Tract I shall be dedicated as public road right-of-way and improved to the urban, sub access street standard. d) 148th Avenue SE along the frontage of the site shall be improved to the urban collector arterial standard, including provision for a bicycle lane. e) Tracts Mshall be improved as a private joint use driveway and shall serve a maximum of two lots. Lots 40 and 41 shall have undivided ownership of the tract and be responsible for its maintenance. A note indicating the ownership of the tract and the parties which are responsible for its maintenance shall appear on the final plat and engineering plans. As specified in KCRS 3.01 C, improvements to the tract shall include an 18 foot wide paved surface and a minimum tract width of 20 feet. Drainage control shall include a curb or thickened edge on one side of the roadway. Tracts D, F and L shall be designed and improved as private access tracts and shall each serve no more than six lots. The lots served by each tract shall have undivided ownership of the tract and be responsible for its maintenance. A note indicating the ownership of each tract and the parties responsible for each tract's maintenance shall appear on the final plat and engineering plans. Improvements shall conform to KCRS 2.03 for urban minor access roads, which includes a 22 foot wide paved driving surface. The centerlines of Tracts D and Fshall be aligned with the centerlines of Roads D and C, respectively. The minimum tract width shall be 26 feet with a maximum length of 150 feet. g) The width of Tract N may be reduced to 20 feet. No improvements to this tract are required. h) A temporary turnaround shall be provided at the terminus of Road A. If this turnaround is located off -site, easements shall be deeded to King County to allow for the temporary public use of the turnaround until Road A is extended further north as a public road. i) Street illumination shall be provided at the intersection of Road A with 148th Avenue SE, a collector arterial, in accordance with KCRS 5.03. j) 148th Avenue SE along the frontage of the site may require a design for a bus zone and turn outs. As specified in KCRS 2.16, the applicant's design engineer shall contact METRO and the Issaquah School District to determine if a bus zone is needed, and if so the specific design requirements. k) Modification to the above road conditions may be considered by King County, pursuant to the variance procedures in KCRS 1.08. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. All construction and upgrading of public and private roads shall be done in accordance with City of Renton requirements, with the exception of street pavement widths for the new streets. The new streets can he constructed with the pavement widths approved with the preliminary plat. The pavement thickness must be a minimum of 4 "of asphalt over 6" of crushed rock. However, rolled curb would not be considered acceptable; therefore, vertical curbs would be required. Any streets narrower than 32 feet in width must be posted for no parking along one side of the street. Any street narrower than 28 feet must be posted for no parking along both sides of the street. All streets within the plat will be subject to naming specified by the Development Services Division. Street lighting must be provided to meet the minimum street lighting levels established in Renton Code. The streetlights along the arterial streets must be constructed per City of Renton standards, and turned over to the City for ownership and maintenance. The streetlights on the residential streets can be constructed as a City system, or as a Puget Sound Energy (PSE) system. The maintenance and electrical bills to PSE, would be the responsibility of the homeowners' association for a PSE system The development complied with City of Renton roadway standards. Upon recording, all new internal roads will be classified as residential streets. All roads were designed and constructed to the City of Renton standards. All roadways have 32 feet of pavement, vertical curb, gutter, 5-foot sidewalks, streetlights and pavements section per City of Renton code. Dedication to the City of Renton of a 12-foot strip along the frontage with 148"' Ave SE will have sidewalks and streetlights. Improvements along 1481' Ave SE are being installed per King County standards, since it is King County Right -of -Way (is outside the Growth Boundary Area and the ROW was not included in the annexation). 9.9. Boundary Line Adjustment LOOL0089 shall be completed and put into effect through the recording of deeds, prior to the approval of the engineering plans for the subject plat. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. The Boundary Line Adjustment has been recorded. 9.10. All utilities within proposed rights -of -way must be included within a franchise approved by the King County Council, prior to final plat recording. Renton Requirement: All utilities within proposed right-of-way must be approved by Renton Development Services Division prior to final plat recording. Plans for all utilities, including electric, gas, telephone and cable must be approved by the Development Services Division prior to construction, and the construction of these utilities must be approved by a Renton inspector. All design of utilities within proposed right-of-way were reviewed by the City of Renton. 9.11. The applicant or subsequent owner shall comply with King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), by paying the required MPS fee and administration fee as determined by the applicable fee ordinance. The applicant has the option to either: (1) pay the MPS fee at final plat recording, or (2) pay the MPS fee at the time of building permit issuance. If the first option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the fee in effect at the time of plat application and a note shall be placed on the face of the plat that reads, "All fees required by King County Code 14.75, Mitigation Payment System (MPS), have been paid. " If the second option is chosen, the fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of building permit application. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall pay the City of Renton the standard transportation mitigation fee of $75 per net new average daily trip, prior to recording of the final plat, as required by City of Renton concurrency policies. The transportation mitigation fee, based on 44 new single family lots shall be $31,581.00. Transportation mitigation fee will be paid prior to recording of the plat. 9.12. Lots within this subdivision are subject to KCC 21A.43 and Ordinance 14009 which imposed impact fees to fund school system improvements needed to serve new development. As a condition of final approval, fifty percent of the impact fees due for the plat shall be assessed and collected immediately prior to recording, using the fee schedules in effect when the plat receives final approval. The balance of the assessed fee shall be allocated evenly to the dwelling units in the plat and shall be collected prior to building permit issuance. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall pay the City of Renton the standard Issaquah School Impact fee of $2,937.00 per net new residence, prior to the issuance of building permits, as required by City of Renton policies. Payment of Issaquah School District will be required prior to the issuance of any building permit. 9.13. There shall be no vehicular access to 148th Avenue SE from those lots in the subject plat, which abut this street. There shall be no direct vehicular access to the portion of Road A east of Road C from the lots, which abut this portion of this street. A note to this effect shall appear on the final plat and engineering plans. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. No lots will have direct vehicular access from 1481h Ave SE. A minor modification was granted on April 28, 2004 providing direct access to Road A for all lots abutting that right-of-way. 9.14. Twelve feet of additional right-of-way for 148th Avenue SE shall be dedicated along the east property line, allowing for 42 feet of right-of-way from centerline. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. Upon recording of the plat, a 12-foot strip along the frontage with 1481h Ave SE will be dedicated to the City of Renton for Right -of -Way purposes. 9.15. The following note shall be shown on the final engineering plan and recorded plat: RESTRICTIONS FOR SENSITIVE AREA TRACTS AND SENSITIVE AREAS AND BUFFERS Dedication of a sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer conveys to the public a beneficial interest in the land within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. This interest includes the preservation of native vegetation for all purposes that benefit the public health, safety and welfare, including control of surface water and erosion, maintenance of slope stability, and protection of plant and animal habitat. The sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer imposes upon all present and future owners and occupiers of the land subject to the tract/sensitive area and all trees and other vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer. The vegetation within the tract/sensitive area and buffer may not be cut, pruned, covered by fill, removed or damaged without approval in writing from the King County Department of Development Environmental Services or its successor agency, unless otherwise provided by law. The common boundary between the tract/sensitive area and buffer and the area of development activity must be marked or otherwise flagged to the satisfaction of King County prior to any clearing, grading, building construction or other development activity on a lot subject to the sensitive area tract/sensitive area and buffer. The required marking or flagging shall remain in place until all development proposal activities in the vicinity of the sensitive area are completed. No building foundations are allowed beyond the required 15 foot building setback line, unless otherwise provided by law. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. Reference should be to the Renton Development Services Division in place of DDES and King County. The note regarding Restrictions for Sensitive Area Tracts and Sensitive Areas and buffers has been placed on the face of the plat. 9.16. The proposed subdivision shall comply with the sensitive area requirements as outlined in KCC 21A.24. Permanent survey marking and signs as specified in KCC 21.A.24.160 shall also be addressed prior to final plat approval. Temporary marking of sensitive areas and their buffers (e.g. with bright orange construction fencing) shall be placed on the site and shall remain in place until all construction activities are completed. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. Bright construction fencing has been installed delineating sensitive areas and buffers. In addition a split rail fence has been installed around the wetland and its associated buffer and signs will be placed indicating the presence of environmentally sensitive area within Tracts A, B and C. 9.17. Preliminary plat review has identified the following issues which apply to this project. All other applicable requirements for sensitive areas shall also be addressed by the applicant. a) Wetland B (in Tract B) shall have a 25 foot native growth buffer, as measured from the wetland edge. Wetland A (extending from the north boundary of the site to the north boundary of the Road A right-of-way) shall have a 50 foot native growth buffer, as measured from the wetland edge, to the extent such buffers falls within the subject property. These wetlands and their required buffers shall be placed in Sensitive Area Tracts in the subject plat. b) The streams crossing Tracts A and C shall have a 50 foot buffer measured from each side of the stream channel, to the extent such buffers fall within the subject plat. These buffers are not required where proposed road right-of-way in the subject plat crosses a stream channel. c) A 1 S foot building setback line (BSBL) shall be established on the final plat from the edge of the sensitive areas tracts. The BSBL shall be delineated on all affected lots and tracts. d) Buffer averaging may be allowed, pursuant to KCC 21A.24.320 and 21A.24.360, provided the total amount of buffer area is not reduced and better resource protection is achieved, as determined by the King County Land Use Service Division (LUSD). If buffer averaging is proposed, a buffer averaging plan shall be submitted by the applicant for review and approval by LUSD. LUSD may require the submittal of a bound or other financial guarantee by the applicant to assure the installation and survival of required plantings for a five year period. e) The stream and wetland crossing by Road A is permitted. This road crossing shall comply with the provisions of KCC21A.24.330Nand 21A.24.370G. The amount of wetland area and stream affected by the road crossing shall be minimized to the extent feasible through the use of retaining structures, if determined appropriate by LUSD. A mitigation plan shall be submitted by the applicant for LUSD approval, to addressed impacts from the wetland/stream crossing. LUSD may require the submittal of a bond or other financial guarantee by the applicant to assure the installation and survival of required plantings for a five-year period. j) The stormwater outfall facility for the stormwater ponds in Tract Hshall not be placed in wetland or stream buffers, unless determined necessary by LUSD, pursuant to provisions of KCC 21A.24.330H4. g) The applicant shall delineate all erosion hazard areas on the site on the final engineering plans. (Erosion hazard areas are defined in KCC 21A. 06.41 S.) The delineation of such areas shall be approved by an LUSD senior geologist. The requirements found in KCC 21A.24.220 concerning erosion hazard areas shall be met, including seasonal restrictions on clearing activities. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. Reference should be to the Renton Development Services Division in place of DDES, LUSD and King County. 10 Wetland B (in Tract B) has a 25-foot buffer and wetland A (in Tract A) has a 50- foot buffer. These buffers were placed in Tracts and labeled as Native Growth Protection Areas (NGPA). The stream crossing the site has a 50-foot buffer on each side of the stream channel and were placed on Tracts A and Tracts C and both are identified as NGPA. A 15-foot building setback line (BSBL) from the edge of the sensitive area tracts is shown on the face of the plat. Buffer averaging with a wetland mitigation plan has been reviewed and approved by Development Services. The design of the culvert for the stream crossing was reviewed and approved by Development Services as well as by Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. The stormwater outfall for the stormwater pond was installed at the edge of the wetland buffer. 9.18. Suitable on -site recreation space shall be provided consistent with the requirements of KCC 21A.14.180 and KCC 21A.14.190 (i.e. sports courts, children's play equipment, picnic tables, benches, etc). The amount of recreation area shall equal or exceed 390 square feet per lot, as required by KCC 21A.14.180A. a) An overall conceptual recreation space plan shall be submitted for review and approval by L USD, with the submittal of the engineering plans. The conceptual recreation plan shall include location, area calculations, dimensions and general improvements. The approved engineering plans shall be consistent with the conceptual plan. b) A detailed recreation space plan (i.e. landscape specifications, equipment specifications, etc) consistent with the overall conceptual plan noted in Item "a " above, shall be submitted for review and approval by LUSD and King County Parks, prior to or concurrently with the submittal of the final plat documents. c) A performance bond for recreation space improvements to assure their installation and the survival of required planting for a three-year period, shall be posted prior to recording of the plat. Renton Requirement. The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. The applicant shall obtain approval of the Development Services Division of the detailed recreational facilities plan before f nal plat approval will be granted. Recreation space will be provided on Tract "F". A recreation space plan was submitted, reviewed and approved by Development Services. The installation of the recreation space and landscape has been deferred through the Board of Public Works and a security device will be in place prior to recording the plat. 9.19. A homeowners' association or other workable organization shall be established to the satisfaction ofLUSD which provides for the ownership and continued maintenance of the recreation and open space areas. Renton Requirement: A homeowners' association shall be established to the satisfaction of Development Services Division in order to maintain the recreation facilities and associated landscaping, and sensitive areas. The homeowners' association shall also be responsible for the maintenance of the drainage facilities constructed for the plat. A Homeowners Association has been created and the CC&Rs (Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions) have provisions for the HOA responsibilities in the maintenance of the recreation facilities and associated landscaping and sensitive areas. The HOA will also be responsible for the maintenance of the drainage facilities, wetlands and open space and the recreational tract. The CC&R was reviewed by the City Attorney and Development Services. 9.20. Street trees shall be included in the design of all road improvements within and adjacent to the subject plat. The street tree landscaping design shall comply with Section 5.03 of the KCRS and the following: a) Trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree for every 40 feet of frontage. Spacing may be modified to accommodate sight distance requirements for driveways and intersections. b) Trees shall be located within the street right-of-way and planted in accordance with Drawing No. 5-009 of the 1993 King County Road Standards, unless L USD determines that trees should not be located in the street right-of-way. c) IfL USD determines that the required street should not be located within the right-of-way, they shall be located no more than 20 feet from the street right-of- way line. d) The trees shall be owned and maintained by the abutting lot owners or the homeowners' association or other workable organization unless the County has adopted a maintenance program. This shall be noted on the face of the final recorded plat. e) The species of trees shall be approved by LUSD if located within the right-of- way, and shall not include poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, gum, any fruit - bearing trees, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct sanitary or storm sewers, or that is not compatible with overhead utility lines. The applicant shall submit a street tree plan and bond quantity sheet for review and approval by L USD prior to engineering plan approval. g) The applicant shall contact Metro Service Planning at (206) 684-1622 to determine if 148th Avenue SE is on a bus route. If 148th Avenue SE is a bus route, the street tree plan shall also be reviewed by Metro. h) The street trees must be installed and inspected, or a performance bond posted prior to recording of the plat. If a performance bond is posted, the street trees must be installed and inspected within one year of recording of the plat. At the time of inspection, if the trees are found to be installed per the approved plan, a maintenance bond must be submitted or the performance bond replaced with a maintenance bond, and held for one year. After one year, the maintenance bond 12 may be released after DDF,S has completed a second inspection and determined that the trees have been kept healthy and thriving. A $538 landscape inspection fee shall also be submitted prior to plat recording. The inspection fee is subject to change based on the current County fees. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. Reference should be to the Renton Development Services Division in place of DDES. There is no separate landscape inspection fee within the City of Renton. The street trees shall be included as part of the construction permit, with appropriate plans, fees and inspections. The street trees plan has been reviewed and approved by Development Services. The installation of the trees has been deferred through the Board of Public Works and a security device will be in place prior to recording of the plat. The trees will be maintained by the adjacent lot owners as noted in the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's). 9.21. Documentation shall be submitted from a licensed land surveyor to demonstrate that all required zoning setbacks are met for any existing residences or outbuildings that are retained on the site. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. The following conditions have been established under SEPA authority as necessary to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of this development. The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with these items prior to final plat approval. All previously existing residences and outbuildings were demolished and removed from the site. This condition is no longer applicable. 9.22. Eastbound and westbound left turn lanes shall be constructed by the applicant on SR 900, at the SR 900/148th Avenue SE intersection. The design for the intersection shall be approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). At a minimum, the existing entering sight distance for the north and south legs of the intersection must be maintained. All construction work associated with turn lane construction shall be completed between April Ist and September 30th. The seasonal restriction shall appear on the final engineering plans. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. The design for the improvements on SR-900 at the SR-900/148"' Ave SE intersection were approved by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). A "Developer Agreement for Stoneridge" has been executed and a Bond for Agreement to WSDOT has been posted. 9.23. The east leg of the SR 900/148th Avenue SE intersection shall be modified, as necessary, so that the stopping sight distance requirements of WSDOT are met on the east leg of the intersection. (Note that per the applicant's engineer, this can be achieved by the clearing of vegetation along SR 900.) In addition, the applicant shall 13 clear vegetation within the right-of-way along SR 900, east of 148th Avenue SE, to maximize the entering sight distance for the north and south legs of the intersection. Renton Requirement: The applicant shall comply with the condition as written. The design for the SR-900/148"' Ave SE intersection have been approved by WSDOT. In addition, a letter from a Professional engineer certified that currently there is no sight distance problem at the intersection. 9.24. A tree containing a red-tailed hawk nest is located on a parcel adjoining the north boundary of the site. Tract K in the subject plat, as depicted on the preliminary plat map received 101900 (sheet I of 3), lies south of this nest tree. This tract shall be labeled as a native growth open space tract on the final plat and engineering plans. This tract shall remain as undeveloped open space unless it is documented by the property owner, to the satisfaction of King County, that the nest is no longer used by red-tailed hawks, (i.e. abandoned for at least five years). If it is demonstrated that the nest has been abandoned, the tract may be developed through the approval of a future plat application, short plat application, or plat alteration application. If Track K is subdivided, the number of lots created in this tract shall be consistent with the zoning and overall permitted density for the entire plat of Stone Ridge. A note implementing the preceding requirements shall appear on the final plat and engineering plans. Documentation was submitted by a wildlife biologist (Chad Armor) assessing the condition of the Red Tail Hawk (RTH) nest that was located in a Douglas -fir tree on the adjacent property to the north (Exhibit 2). The letter states that the nest is no longer present. The branches of the Douglas -fir that supported the nest broke off the tree during a snowstorm in January 2004. Therefore the County requirement for creation of Tract K is no longer relevant. The plat complies with King County overall density. 9.25. Accept as provided below, outdoor construction activities on the subject property on any area lying within a radius of 650 feet from the nest shall be prohibited from February 1 through July 31. For a specific development permit, this seasonal limitation may be waived by King County if it can be shown to the satisfaction of the County that the nest is not being used by hawks. Any waiver will last for one nesting season and must be renewed for subsequent nesting seasons. For any season in which nesting activity occurs, the July 31 seasonal limitation termination date may be adjusted by the County, based on determination that the hatchlings have already fledged and the period of disturbance risk has passed. Any waiver or shortening of the seasonal limitation shall conform with Condition 5 below (#26 in this report). A note implementing the preceding requirement shall appear on the final plat and engineering plans. The utility construction permit was issued on May 2004. According to the biologist the nest was no longer present at that time and the seasonal limitation in construction activities no longer applied. 14 9.26. For any nesting season in which the applicant proposed a waiver or shortening of the seasonal limitation as provided in condition 4 above (#25 in this report), a plan formulated by a qualified wildlife biologist shall be submitted to DDES no later than February 1, describing protocols for monitoring the nest for hawk use and if nest usage is taking place, for identification whether eggs have been laid and hatched and when fledging has occurred. Any proposed shortening or waiver of the seasonal limitation shall be based on the monitoring data and is subject to the approval of DDES. A note implementing the preceding requirements shall appear on the final plat and engineering plans. According to the wildlife biologist the nest was no longer present when the construction permit was issued and the seasonal limitation in construction activities no longer applied. 9.27. A six-foot high cedar fence shall be constructed on the south boundary of Tract K, adjacent to Lots 26 — 34 and Tracts H and N. The purpose of this fence is to limit access to Tract K by the adjoining residence and to lessen impacts on nesting red- tailed hawks. Since there is no Tract K to fence and the red tailed hawk nest is no longer present, this condition is no longer applicable. 9.28. To mitigate the significant adverse impact the plat of Stone Ridge has on the intersection of SR 900/148th Avenue SE, the applicant shall either individually or in conjunction with other developments in the area, install a traffic signal. The signal design shall be reviewed and approved by WSDOT and an appropriate financial guarantee shall be posted prior to engineering plan approval. The applicant submitted copies of the approved plans for the intersection of 1481h Ave SE and SR-900. A bond has been placed with WSDOT to assure the installation of the required improvements. 9.29. All grading work in designated erosion hazard areas on the site shall be completed consistent with the seasonal restrictions appearing in KCC 16.82.150D (see condition 17g above.) A note to this effect shall appear on the engineering plans. Erosion control facilities were installed and maintained during all grading and installation of improvements. Erosion control were designed in accordance to the King County Surface Water Design Manual. CONCLUSIONS The Final Plat generally appears to satisfy the conditions imposed by the preliminary plat process and therefore should be approved by the City Council. 15 RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the Final Plat with the following conditions: 1. All plat fees shall be paid prior to the recording of the plat. 2. All plat improvements shall be either constructed or deferred to the satisfaction of City staff prior to the recording of the plat. SUBMITTED THIS 10'h DAY OF AUGUST, 2005 4.6ate-412 IANA FRI DEVELOPMENI SERVICES DIVISION cc: Kayren Kittrick LUA-05-001-FP 16 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL [AI N: C . Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: September 12, 2005 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. City of Renton code for new short plats and the Long Ordinance ............. Short Plat — LUA05-011 Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Study Sessions...... Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Information......... Administrative Report & Decision Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... X Other..... .... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The City requires a 5' dedication along the frontage of the Long Short Plat (LUA05-011) property to conform to the right-of-way width needed on Meadow Ave. N. Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording the deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. 1:\PlanReview\COLSON\Shortplats 2005\Long SHPL 04m AGNBILL.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 334270-0620 Project File #: Street Intersection: N 38'" ST/MEADOW AV N. Reference Number(s) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Meadow, LLC Grantee(s): I • 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page 4) A FIVE FOOT WIDE PARCEL OF LAND FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR MEADOW AVENUE NORTH. ALL BEING LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated in the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. ADDroved and Accented Bv: Grantor(s): Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that i'Gn Cmd Notary Seal must be within box IC01 `l �i��i ackn�ed d it to be hislher/t�heirfreo and voluntary actfor lthe instrument es and purposes O H ti� mentioned to the instrument. 4.�Sgl F�, %. �t1OTA FR yA�9N _ ip �iq� PuBuo o Notary Public in and for the St a of Washington ,A ,0F p� Notary (Print) _ cndr>2 Lf:► c '�eE R 9 A \.. ®� • . • • ' My appointment expires: i� - _n WAS Dated: Hforms/xxxFnVAGREEIDEED.DOC\ CoR Page 1 FORM 04 0001/bh INDIVIDUAL FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING 1 I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: REPRESENTATIVE FORM OF A CKNO WLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that, /)') �QRA'Cp�� �i,�� ��,�%� signed this instrument, on oath 41` .`Sg j p jy' F+A stated th4t iWshe/tiiey was/were authorized to execute the instrument and o NoTAR y �'• _ acknowledged it as the *7jgM d as of rnQ�'� ti [_ to be the free and voluntary act of such °' wow °'' _ sN :tOo �U2L10 party/parties for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. f`�yy�He°°� 4.II Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary(Print)��� My appointment expire: i a .!�2 _C77 Dated: CORPORATE FORM OFACKNOWLEDGMENT Notary Seal must be within box STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING On this day of , 19 , before me personally appeared to me known to be of the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledge the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and each on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) My appointment expires: Dated: deed Page 2 ' Exhibit A Legal Description PARCEL FROM WHICH DEDICATION IS BEING MADE FROM TAX PARCEL NO. 334270-0620 THAT PORTION OF TRACTS 123 AND 124 LYING WESTERLY OF STATE HIGWAY NO. 2—A; EXCEPT THE NORTH 95.6 FEET OF SAID TRACT 124, ALL IN HILLMAN'S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN ADDITION TO SEATTLE NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 64, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF TRACT 124 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 124 WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 95.6 FEET OF SAID TRACT 124; THENCE SOUTH 88'42'01" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 95.6 FEET OF TRACT 124, 121.89 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT—OF—WAY MARGIN OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 405 (STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2—A); THENCE SOUTH 04'34'20" WEST ALONG SAID MARGIN 2.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8847'04' WEST 121.75 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 124: THENCE NORTH 01'39'10" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 3.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL BEING SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32. TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., CITY OF RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Page 3 luar 1S/nmH rvAGRFvDEED.DOCi cox FORM 04 0001/bh Exhibit B Legal Description AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF RENTON LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Tracts 123 and 124 of Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Addition to Seattle No. 2 according to the plat recorded in Volume 11 of plats, page 64, in King County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Tract 123 of said plat, said point being also on the easterly right-of-way margin of Meadow Avenue North; Thence N 01 ° 39' 10" E 116.67 feet to the new property line established by a Boundary Line Agreement recorded under Recording No. 20050118900001; Thence S 88' 47' 04" E 5.00 feet; Thence S 01 ° 39' 10" W 116.68 feet to the South line of said Tract 123; Thence N 88' 42' 07 W along said South line 5.00 feet to the Southwest corner of Tract 123 and Point of Beginning. All being situated in the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 24 North, Range 5 East, W.M., City of Renton, County of King, Washington. Page 4 Worms/xxxmvAGRBE/DEED.D0C1 coR FORM 04 0001/bh WQ ^ WO I N �' %i U I I W O y I W O i = Q— 1 i / W p�ti U g } p ti J to F- I� /� W L- 0* T , �V F- m Z �O = O (D W N / �l �pN -iq� 00 / / d CV = ImoI C=>. u-No N W O W U N m =1 cD 1 m cV i O LL-< m I Co dmOZ 1 00 z Co1- / 1 N JLr;O l uJ(ALi m � Z / ��� 1 00 N I �� Z a r - -�----- ----- I L --- -�- --- -- W M '-------- / (V Z / a 04 31d0 S £8S 89' l M „0 ,6 l0 S HRION L9'91 1 3 „OL,6£ N .J N.1 �i 2-c� .X C F''{is '! 4 '.J •y h! Y� : ' t O -#S'`rti��� �'N' s �.UPE ti Co - >7 Baima Holmberg Inc. f E N G I N EERS & SURVEYORS 11332 100 FRONT STREET SOUTH ISSAQUAH, WASHINGTON 98027 (425) 392 - 0250 Sj�I may..• . • - - - AL LAB Page 5 EXP11//0�' TIOAREA OF DEDICAN = 583.38 sq. ft.• Exhibit C IRES 30 � Inc/•l. FS� �/I^ R O .-� z I$T AMEND x 49 'ST PO RD ,,� �. i b A Dplyp, J II ,'P ✓i U IT 1:: , ` p y♦)e �90 ` 0.52 Ac io 75 Ac. 36 Gpy� J.16 4�S 82A. 70A<® :4_`u<- 6 O g N. 40TH 89 4 3D 493. 141 a 3 1 1 3xe.e -- 00 95 6 5 es pN a 3 z F. ESL s ,o es es as. 109 40 50 Z Il0 so 3E 12_ N. 38TH o )oo 51 ti N 7f/ W 3 1 Q ' ! 1 o_ i N 1 0 1x 1 0 c I us I 7M , . �' l3731 5 • 7? 10 �S. --- - i 372 ,37 3 M_ _ I.r 24W. � _2 60. - 120 y 11> u) (2) oas. a e-n ce) I r ig $:P.039-83 F P.359-7 m u 56.9! 16q 150 IID 98 12 3. I I. i Boll (A) �37 2 • c 65.6 es u ws i 0) /3 -------- �7 TI-1 ST. a .s o . +I. so .a 3f S.PLUA.9 (A) OSSS 1 Y 12 o ©(I) Y � S(B) .3 - - S.P.193-78 60 xT.0 BD coo i � 600 0 ' N" ' 6TH T. „ ;0 10a 110 10 x 7 .'].^�f !, ;1� 1n (I) (2) F a +ypli l ^1 11 II N IK S.P.00 •90 II_ I I<J �I I ,I I�--_-__- a (3) 3s12 (4) a �2, = S"}---ti� (• iul I t ir3 /S 10-tslx s <ti' q o lob At 1u1.I 1 B.6o L 4� <�-, F-Lo i-------'� - ,),I -' l a a I ^= J.qi. I I ••' 29 21,. r%� o I^..3506 152 ' c l4o ao' n Fru� 73 2 32 ST. �, `�-- 30 Bi 73 231i5F-=L26 ---- - 1_____ (;, I N_ ry �_._b4l 20 21 22 23� 1r \ SP 110-77 - ,Ir ® 30 ,29 8 25_ r--i 1 1 {2yJ Ti. act h 0 so 0 141 uFi' JI I it u i I 1 :i N. 34TH N ST.- �---, 11 IB1 g 3 f9 G ±o y ` ie 19 zo 22, 2 za 5 33 d 1l1s,.rp6,2-81 ,8 (A) +7 W. r3 r ED 1:2 ' 11133 g E(I) n2 0 (2) 15001 (3) 50 (4) S ut42 S.P.056 30001 - s r/ 41 __= 200 1 aoo ao 104 Ion AOO --- 1 103 --38° ,AKE4 W Goo �, 02 600 291.23 U S)•Dq'4GF GARq GFS r l INCH 200 FEET . .. '-----------a:3i ---- C . I W rM2 PH. 4 Z i run.$ 7 ---_—__------Y--- • E'er. 12.03 AC. o Q0 h ^ /6 V = P C'l - W 2l2.13 to ur Nor OPEN 1-114, `° G A D wl..! J 4 TRA W s ,! TR. B 297.97 LI ti ar 52 '( Ofrn5 �QZ__- W( c� e Z, S.P; s S O 92S �.56 '.VACATE �I a 1140 „ fns,51B g � 115 3 1 e 117.4 ° 104.11 223. 117Lo ( (10,Za3 0 - --� - - 156.17 ------------ 9 q ; 6o '� 6 e 119 3 ' - - 36TH bo 1d..12 ST 11 �1 1— Nor 234.25 � 1 ` 736.a :) 1 May Cree E 68, u° Park x z AI 671 t King County Pork. D-PI �• ; IA I 66 rl Q U v \ a 4\? 4o W 6�� o REPORT City of Renton of Planning / Building / Public Works &Department DECISION ADMINISTRATIVE SHORT PLAT REPORT & DECISION A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: REPORT DATE. March 3, 2005 Project Name Long Short Plat Owner/Applicant: Meadow, LLC 2624 260"' Place SE Sammamish, WA 98075-7907 Contact., Shupe Holmberg, Baima & Holmberg, Inc 100 Front St. S Issaquah, WA 98027 File Number LUA-05-011, SHPL-A Project Manager Jill Hall, Associate Planner Project Description Administrative Land Use Action (Short Plat Review) for the subdivision of an existing 13,866 square foot (0.32 acre) parcel zoned Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre into 2 lots and a 5-foot dedication of right-of-way. An existing 1,344 sq. ft. residence and 371 sq. ft. detached garage are proposed to remain on Lot 2. Proposed Lot 1 area would be 6,116 square feet, proposed Lot 2 area would be 7,167 square feet, and the proposed right-of- way dedication is 583 square feet. Access to the proposed lots would be from residential driveways onto Meadow Ave N. Project Location 3704 Meadow Ave N Project Location Map AdminRPT Long.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED March 3, 2005; PROJECT LUA-05-011, SHPL-A Page 3 Section 4-7-150: Streets -General Requirements and Minimum Standards Section 4-7-170: Residential Lots -General Requirements and Minimum Standards 5. Chapter 9 Procedures and Review Criteria F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. 1. Land Use Element — Residential Single Family 2. Community Design Element G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. Project Description/Background The applicant, Meadow, LLC, is proposing to subdivide a 0.32-acre (13,867 square feet) parcel zoned Residential — 8 dwelling units per acre (R-8) into two lots. The property currently contains a 1,344 square foot single-family residence, which will remain on new Lot 2. The required front yard setback is 15 feet for the primary structure and 20 feet for an attached garage. The required rear yard setback is 20 feet. Proposed lot sizes are: Lot 1 at 6,116 sq. ft. and Lot 2 at 7,167 sq. ft. The proposal for the eventual development of one new single-family residence on Lot 1 with the existing residence to remain on new Lot 2 would arrive at a density of 7.7 dwelling units per net acre (du/ac). The allowed density range in the R-8 zone is a minimum of 4.0 to a maximum of 8.0 dwelling units per acre. Access to the proposed lots would be through single-family residential driveways onto Meadow Ave N. The topography of the subject site is generally flat with a gradual slope or approximately 8% from southwest to northeast. Of the currently existing 12 trees onsite, 5 trees on Lot 1 would be removed to accommodate the building pad, driveway, and utilities for the new single family residence. No trees are proposed to be removed on Lot 2. 2. Environmental Review Except when located on lands covered by water or sensitive areas, short plats are exempt from SEPA Environmental Review pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(a). 3. Compliance with ERC Conditions N/A 4. Staff Review Comments Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address issues raised by the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. Consistency Short Plat Criteria Approval of a plat is based upon several factors. The following short plat criteria have been established to assist decision -makers in the review of the plat: a) Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Designation The site is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Lands in the RSF designation are intended to be used for quality residential detached development organized into neighborhoods at urban densities. It is intended that larger subdivision, infill development, and rehabilitation of existing housing be carefully designed to enhance and improve the quality of single-family living environments. The proposal is consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Community Design Element policies: Policy LU-147. Net development densities should fall within a range of 4.0 to 8.0 dwelling units per acre in Residential Single Family neighborhoods. The proposed project for two lots would arrive at a net density of 6.7 dwelling units per net acre, which is within the allowable density range. AdminRPT_Long. doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED March 3, 2005; PROJECT LUA-05-011, SHPL-A Page 5 c) Community Assets Of the existing 12 trees located onsite, 5 trees on proposed Lot 1 would be removed for the development of the short plat. The City's landscape code (RMC 4-4-070) requires all short plats to provide a 5 foot landscaped strip in the front yard area of lots that abut a public right-of-way. The applicant will be required to install a 5-foot of landscaped strip along the frontage of Meadow Ave N within the proposed lots. In addition, the applicant will be required to plant two ornamental trees, a minimum caliper of 1-1/2 inches (deciduous) or 6 — 8 feet in height (conifer), within the 15-foot front yard setback area for the proposed lots. A landscape plan must be submitted for approval by the Development Services Project Manager prior to recording of the final short plat. d) Compliance with Subdivision Regulations Streets: No new public streets would be created as part of the proposed short plat. Meadow Ave N is classified as a Residential Access Street on the City's Arterial Street Map. Residential Access Streets require a right-of-way width of 50 feet and 32 feet of paving (RMC 4-6- 060F). Meadow Ave N is currently substandard with a right-of-way width of 40 feet with 31 feet of pavement along the frontage of proposed Lot 1 that narrows to 20 feet of pavement along the frontage of proposed Lot 2. Therefore, the applicant will be required to dedicate five feet of right-of- way along the site's Meadow Ave N frontage. The Subdivision Regulations require the installation of half street improvements, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk, along the site's Meadow Ave N frontage (RMC section 4-6-060), unless waived or deferred through the City of Renton Board of Public Works. A restrictive covenant will be required to be recorded with the short plat if the street improvements are deferred. The proposed short plat is anticipated to generate additional traffic on the City's street system. In order to mitigate transportation impacts, staff recommends a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring a Transportation Mitigation Fee based on $75.00 per net new average daily trip attributed to the project. One new lot (credit given for the existing residence) is expected to generate approximately 9.57 new average weekday trips. The fee for the proposed short plat is estimated at $717.75 ($75.00 x 9.57 trips x 1 lot = $717.75) and is payable prior to the recording of the short plat. Blocks: No new blocks will be created as part of the proposed short plat. Lots: The size, shape, orientation, and arrangement of the proposed lots comply with the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations and the development standards of the R-8 zone. Each lot is rectangular in shape, oriented to provide front yards facing Meadow Ave N, and provides direct access to a public street (Meadow Ave N). The minimum lot size in the R-8 zone is 5,000 square feet. The proposed lot sizes are 6,116 square feet for Lot 1 and 7,167 square feet for Lot 2, which meet the minimum lot size requirements. The minimum lot width in the R-8 zone is 60 feet for corner lots and 50 feet for interior lots. Proposed Lot 1 has a lot width of 53 feet and Lot 2 has a lot width of 63 feet. The minimum lot depth in the R-8 zone is 65 feet. Proposed Lot 1 has a lot depth of 115 feet and Lot 2 has a lot depth of 112 feet. The dimensions of the proposed lots meet the minimum width and depth requirements and are compatible with other existing lots in this area under the same R-8 zoning classification. In addition, both lots appear to contain adequate building areas for the construction of suitable single-family residences when taking setbacks and lot coverage requirements into consideration. These requirements will be reviewed at the time of building permit application. e) Reasonableness of Proposed Boundaries Access: Each lot would have direct access to a public right-of-way (Meadow Ave N) the single- family residential driveways. Topography. The topography of the subject site is generally flat with a gradual slope or approximately 8% from southwest to northeast. Relationship to Existing Uses: The properties surrounding the subject site are single-family residences and are designated Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre (R-8) on the City's zoning AdminRPT Long.doc City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED March 3, 2005; PROJECT LUA-05-011, SHPL-A Page 7 4. Zoning: The proposal as presented complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Residential Single Family - 8 (R-8) zoning designation, provided all advisory notes and conditions of approval are complied with. 5. Subdivision Regulations: The proposal complies with the requirements established by the City's Subdivision Regulations provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 6. Existing Land Uses: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); East: Interstate 405 (zoned R-8); South: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8); and West: Residential Single Family (zoned R-8). 7. Setbacks: The setbacks for future development on the proposed lots would be evaluated based on the standards applicable to lots along streets existing as of March 1, 1995. The front yard setback of the proposed lots would face to the west onto Meadow Ave N. An existing residence on Lot 1 is proposed to remain and would comply with the setback requirements of the R-8 zone. The setbacks for Lot 2 would be verified at the time of building permit review. 8. System Development Charges: A Water System Development Charge, a Surface Water System Development Charge and a Sewer System Development Charge, at the current applicable rates, will be required for the each new single-family residence as part of the construction permit. 9. Public Utilities: The applicant will be required to install individual sewer and water stubs to serve the new lots. In addition, a new fire hydrant must be installed and must be fitted with 5" quick disconnect Storz fittings. 1, Conclusions: 1. The subject site is located in the Residential Single Family (RSF) comprehensive plan designation and complies with the goals and policies established with this designation. 2. The subject site is located in the Residential — 8 Dwelling Units Per Acre zoning designation and complies with the zoning and development standards established with this designation provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 3. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the subdivision regulations as established by city code and state law provided all advisory notes and conditions are complied with. 4. The proposed two lot short plat complies with the street standards as established by City Code, provided the project complies with all advisory notes and conditions of approval contained herein. J. DECISION: The Long Short Plat, File No. LUA-05-011, SHPL-A, is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall pay the required Transportation Mitigation Fee at the rate of $75.00 per net new average daily trip associated with the project. The Transportation Mitigation Fee shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 2. The applicant shall pay a Fire Mitigation Fee based on a rate of $488.00 per new single-family lot with credit given for the existing residence. The fee for this short plat is estimated at $488.00 (1 new single family lot x $488.00 = $488.00) and shall be paid prior to the recording of the short plat. 3. A landscape plan must be submitted for approval by the Development Services Division Project Manager prior to recording of the final short plat. DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: SIGNATURES: AdminRPT Long.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Land Use Action REPORT AND DECISION DATED March 3, 21-05; PROJECT LUA-05-011, SHPL-A page 9 ADVISORY NOTES TO APPLICANT The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the administrative land use action. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for the land use actions. Planninq 1. RMC section 4-4-030.C.2 limits haul hours between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm, Monday through Friday unless otherwise approved by the Development Services Division. The Development Services Division reserves the right to rescind the approved extended haul hours at any time if complaints are received. 2. Commercial, multi -family, new single family and other nonresidential construction activities shall be restricted to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Work on Saturdays shall be restricted to the hours between 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. No work shall be permitted on Sundays. Property Services 1. Please see attached comments from Property Services. 1. Afire hydrant with 1,000 GPM fire flow is required within 300 feet of all new single-family structures. If the building square footage exceeds 3,600 sq. ft. in area, the minimum fire flow increases to 1,500 GPM and requires two hydrants within 300 feet of the structures. 2. Street addresses shall be visible from a public street. Plan Review— Storm/Surface Water 1. A Surface Water System Development Charge of $715.00 per single-family lot is payable at the time of issuance of the utility construction permit. Plan Review — Sewer 1. Short plats shall provide separate side sewer stubs to each new building lot. Side sewers are required be installed prior to the recording of the short plat. No dual side sewers are allowed. 2. A Sewer System Development Charge of $900.00 per new building lot is payable at the time of issuance of utility construction permit. Plan Review — Water 1. A Water System Development Charge of $1,525.00 per each new single family lot is payable at the time of issuance of a construction permit. 2. Water service stubs to each building lot are required to be installed prior to recording of the short plat. Plan Review — Streets/Transportation 1. Street improvements including curb/gutter, sidewalks and paving are required on the project side, along Meadow, Ave N. Plan Review — General 1. All plans shall conform to the Renton Drafting Standards. 2. A construction permit is required. When plans are complete, three copies of the drawings, two copies of the drainage report, a construction estimate, application and appropriate fees shall be submitted to the 6 h floor counter. AdminRPT Long.doc H 3 g a a rw 0- 0Ln z ox O W W; UJ N w a PORTION OF THE N.W. 1/4, OF SEC. 32, TWN 24 N., RGE 5 E., W.M. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON •Nr Q • .•rt+ NErt+ p rRL Nm+ANT N u +r m 9c+ NW..aE O 9•r0. 9• N ]DN 51 51*E Q CI z Y I: � a , i ,� u eerN s VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION NIT POWWOW OF TRACTS 123 AND 121, r1Nc WESTERLY OF STATE «ONWAY NO 2-A. E%CERt NE NORM 9-rEEr Or SAIc TRACT IM ALL IN HILL.-$ LARE wA3NINcicN —oEN Or EOCN —TIOW 10 SEATTLE FRNRE1 2. ACCOROINO TO NE PLAT N(REOr RE—0 IN —LK 11 Or PLA15. PACE 64. RECON0$ Or' —0 D—TY, WAS..CloN. SNATE TN TIE D-11 Or RINO, STATE Or wASNRVGTM. BASIS OF BEARING NELD REA.Nc, N66'a]'AS'w, ON CENI(RLINE Or N. ]6N MEET. PER "SWAN vJE SNORT PIAi', REc—ID IN wLUNE 11e Or SURKK. PACE 2J1. RfCOR05 a NINO COUNTT, WASIRIOTON. BENCHMARK GTv a RENTON N0. 326 TOR or NARO NAIL 2 rEET EA51 Or CENTERLINE INTCRSEC RON or PUR AA-I,E NmN AND NORM "' PLACE TO CLEVAN . 162.09 FEET DATUM NAw ee INSTRUMENTATION INI R 111 11E1: s s(ca+D roTAL srARaN. nElO -- WAS 9v CLOSED TWA1(RSC LOOPS. NPIINVW CLOSURE OF LOOPS WAS 5:22.0Do. IN ACCORDANCE WIN WAC 332-130-09o. OWNER/DEVELOPER: E I- 262A 26ON PLACE SE. SAIANAAWSN, WA 96025 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: 8ANA A NOLIKRO. INC. W MR T STREET ISSAOVAN. WA. 9e027 CHECKED FOR CONPUANCE TO CITY STANDARDS � Debi art �� Ceii rronl 8 before you 1.800-424-5555 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL [AI k: I., V. Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: September 12, 2005 Dept/Div/Board.. Development Services Division Staff Contact...... Carrie K. Olson x7235 Agenda Status Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: Acceptance of additional right-of-way to comply with Correspondence.. City of Renton code for new short plats and the Dalpay Ordinance ............. Estates Division H Short Plat — LUA03-125 Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Deed of Dedication Study Sessions...... Exhibit Map Vicinity Map Information......... Hearing Examiner's Report Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... X Other. Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project. SUMMARY OF ACTION: As a condition of the Hearing Examiner's Report and in order to provide additional right-of-way width for future expansion of NE 19th St., the City requires a 10' dedication of property along the north property line of the Dalpay Estates Division II Short Plat (LUA03-125). Council acceptance of said right-of-way should be completed prior to recording the deed with the short plat. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Deed of Dedication. 1APlanReview\C0LS0N\Shortp1ats 2005\Dalpay Estates SHPL 06m AGNBI LL.doc Return Address: City Clerk's Office City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 DEED OF DEDICATION Property Tax Parcel Number: 3340401595 Project File #: LUA03-125 Street Intersection: NE 19` Street Reference Numbers) of Documents assigned or released: Additional reference numbers are on page Grantor(s): Grantee(s): 1. Dalpay Properties, LLC 1. City of Renton, a Municipal Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (Abbreviated or full legal must go here. Additional legal on page ) THE SOUTH 10 FEET OF THE NORTH 25 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROTION OF LAND: THE EAST HALF.017 THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE EAST 155 FEET THEREOF; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING The Grantor, for and in consideration of mutual benefits conveys, quit claims, dedicates and donates to the Grantee(s) as named above, the above described real estate situated In the County of King, State of Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day and year as written below. Approved and Accepted By: Gra�r Grantee(s): City of Renton Mayor (�V 0,41-F4Y 1D9d?C-1T7/E5, LIZ City Clerk INDIVIDUAL FORM OF STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Notary Seal must be within box DA �.P1g� signed this instrument and ledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes NOTARY PUBLIC ment ned in the instrument. STATE OF WASHINGTON TERRANCE R. WILSON My :Appointment Expires May 1, o Public in and for the State of Washington Notary (Print) 1z4L►N-3 G ? V) My appointment expires: V-X Pt a Dated: 1 o Page 1 FORM 04 0001 /bh Exhibit A Legal Description THE SOUTH 10 FEET OF THE NORTH 25 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROTION OF LAND: THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M.; EXCEPT THE EAST 155 FEET THEREOF; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF RENTON, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 2 FORM 04 0001lbh CL m LU 4 FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT W1 3 BRASS DISK IN CASE E. 1/4 COR. VISITED ON 2-7-97 40016 t l R�CIST6RtiO:' J ANA L LAIN 5 1 O EXPIRES: SCALE N � co NCRTE MONUMENT " =40' 2 'RASS DISK IN CASE AT REDMOND AVE. N.E. 40 40 N. LN., S.W. 114, N.E. 1 /4' S. E. 114 SEC 4, T23N, RSE, W.M. W 984. 913, 19TH ST. -- _ — `J 8os --- 171.968 ' _ v; 171.975' 2 J AREA TO BE DEDICATED ----------BSB FOR RIGHT—OF—WAY w g _ _ — — — — — — — — L TO THE CITY OF RENTON LOT 1 1O,32Of SQ. FT. --------------------'—'' 172.012' �Ns 0 WO �W• a -ra u + SE 104 H a x : i• / t , H ,7 i7 .!A, y _ {lo J ��, tl Its i = Irll+ou .. •ot v to 4 ,e N r i yr ', y•' e t I♦ , 7f • Z i►a1T la i G R E E N :'1 "A 7 o I NL n ,1 is ■ �! try r„ 0»,1' u t ■ rl Q r .A I , . t� ' I.l r. ■I Q D titE t f9TH I ST 1 II # N. E. 1jT 1 Park ' Ix y m ■ w R i I h r = n Mf 77N NE. 17TH s . , QI 1ar � n o • 1 S r �At 1 `� Q 1Nat 7iS� Irk , >W p: L �•• 0 r ® C J71A. _. F NEe C9 Ir " ` 2 =�= SUNSET _ "Q S ■ QUA, J ■ I om .� %04,'., 1®, LY C23 Ent. S / > a N NEZ14TH S . III ■ W n /. �/ .• �, �` i 2 1 7 At \� I StAJ 44 � �— ,>l,l.t YO/R n� ,1„4 1 J � W 1 � •`K >y!d ril� , r•i�. '•y /,I\ I IN 10 t I IlJfR M/.t is !I• II 2 I'p ti/1 2 �ii / I I ? _ @l i >'r',." �, `I April 13, 2004 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT: Dalpay and Associates 4033 NE Sunset Boulevard Renton, WA 98059 Dalpay Estates Division II Short Plat File No.: LUA-03-125 SHPL-H, ECF LOCATION: 3801 NE 19"' Street CONTACT: Ale Kondelis Cramer NW, Inc 945 North Central Kent, WA 98032 SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Subdivide an approximately 2.52-acre site into 5 lots intended for the development of new detached single-family homes. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on March 23, 2004. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application, field checking the property and surrounding area; the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The following minutes are a summary of the March 30, 2004 hearing. The legal record is recorded on CD. The hearing opened on Tuesday, March 30, 2004, at 10:23 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No. 2: Neighborhood Detail Map application, proof of posting, proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 3: Preliminary Plat Drawing Exhibit No. 4: Tree Cutting and Land Clearing Plan Dalpay Estates II Short Plat File No.:LUA-03-125, SHPI, II, ECF April 13, 2004 Page 2 Exhibit No 5_ Zoning Map Exhibit No. 6: Memo from Sonja Fesser (also part of the Yellow File) _Exhibit No. 7: Letter from Enoch V. Maffeo, attorney for Dalpay Properties, dated 4/12/01 Exhibit No. 8: Letter from John T. Ludlow, attorney for Susan Bledsoe, dated 4/18/01 Exhibit No. 9: 4/25/01-- - -- Letter from John T. Ludlow dated Exhibit No. l0A4: Tree photos ---- ---- Exhibit No. 11: Drawing by Mr. Barfknecht — - _-- — The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by Kristina _Catlin, Planner, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way, Renton, Washington 98055. The applicant is proposing to subdivide 2.5 acres into 5 lots. The site is located south of NE 19°i Street. A previously existing single-family residence on the property was demolished in 2001. Approximately 33,045 square feet of the site is proposed to be located within a Native Growth Protection Easement (NGPE) due to the presence of protected and sensitive slopes. On the tree -cutting plan, the applicant proposed to remove up to 9 coniferous trees and 7 deciduous trees which are located outside the steep slope areas. The Environmental Review Committee reviewed this project and issued a Determination of Non -Significance -- Mitigated (DNS-M) with 15 mitigation measures. No appeals were filed. This property is designated Residential Single Family (RSF) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. It is compatible with several of the land use policies. This proposal allows 5 units where previously there was only one unit. The proposal arrives at a net density of 2.89 dwelling units per acre, which is less than the minimum density allowed in the R-8 zone. However, due to the sensitive areas in this parcel, a deduction in density is allowed. Renton Municipal Code Section 4-2-110D.I.b allows minimum density requirements to be waived due to lot configuration, lack of access, environmental or physical constraints. The proposed lot dimensions in this short plat comply with the minimum lot standards of the R-8 zone. Setbacks in the R-8 zone require a 20' front yard, 20' rear yard and 5' on each side as well as a 15' side yard along a street setback. The F,RC also required that a 25' setback be observed from the top of the steep slopes. Building height in the R-8 zone is 30', a maximum of two stories. These requirements will be evaluated at the time of individual building permits on the individual lots, which will take place after the recording of the short plat. Each unit must provide two off-street parking stalls per unit. No parking will be permitted on the private streets. The lot lines intersect NE 19"' Street at right angles. The proposed private street extending south from NE 19"' will provide access to Lots 1-3, from that point the roadway will be reduced to a shared driveway to provide access to Lots 4 and 5. Each of the lots do meet the minimum lot size, width and depth requirements. Staff does recommend the establishment of a Homeowner's Association or Maintenance Agreement. The proposal is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and "Zoning Code and would not be out of character with recent development in the area. Dalpay Estates 11 Short Plat File No..LUA-03-125, SHPL-I-1, ECF April 13, 2004 Page 3 The proposed subdivision is expected to generate additional traffic on the City street system, the ERC imposed a Traffic Mitigation Fee. Police and Fire Prevention staff indicate that sufficient resources exist to furnish services to the proposed development. The ERC imposed a Fire Mitigation Fee. The ERC imposed a mitigation measure that the applicant be required to submit certified evidence from a structural engineer that the storm water detention vault is able to withstand the load of a 30 ton vehicle with a 322-psi point loading. The proposed short plat is exempt from detention and water quality requirements according to the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The ERC required this project to comply with the Department of Ecology's Erosion and Sediment Control Requirements as outlined in Volume II of the 2001 Stormwater Management Manual. They also required that a maintenance agreement between the owners of the new plat and the Homeowners Association of Dalpay Plat Division I be established so that the homeowners of the new plat would be required to participate in maintaining the storm drainage facility located on this parcel. Staff recommends approval of the Dalpay Estates Division II Short Plat, subject to 5 conditions. Jim Dalpay, PO Box 2436, Renton, WA 98059 requested that the short plat be approved as presented by the City. Susan Bledsoe, 26828 Maple Valley Highway #282, Maple Valley, WA 98038 stated that she is the property owner of the adjoining lot and she did not receive any notification of this hearing. She is the owner of 3807 NE 19`h Street. There was no mention that there is some encroachment onto the property that Dalpay wants to develop. She presented a February 5, 2004 memo from the City of Renton Planning, Building, Public Works, to Kristina Catlin from Sonja Fesser, stating "the issue of encroachment by the adjoiner to the east of the subject short plat property will need to be resolved prior to the final approval of the short plat by the City." That is referring to some buildings on her property. She received a letter from Mr. Dalpay's attorney on April 12, 2001 regarding the encroachments, stating that we had seven days to remove the encroachments. Ms. Bledsoe hired an attorney and a letter dated April 18, 2001 was sent to Mr. Dalpay's attorney stating the history of the property and buildings on her property. Mr. Dalpay's attorney responded with a letter and an offer to purchase the property for $90,000. Ms. Bledsoe's brother and his daughter live on this property. She was not willing to move them out of their home. Ms. Bledsoe's attorney responded to the offer stating that they were not interested in selling. The Examiner asked to have someone explain the encroachment and what it means to the Dalpay project. Kristina Catlin stated that a memo was received from the Property Services Department, which addresses the encroachment of the existing single-family residence to the east of the property proposed to be developed. It does encroach onto the subject site. The memo states that that issue needs to be resolved, the City does not dictate how that issue needs to be resolved, only that there needs to be some resolution that should be reflected on the survey that is submitted for the final short plat. The Examiner stated that it may require moving things and the Examiner will need to know that before the short plat can be approved. Ms. Catlin continued that the issue of the road may mean an adjustment of five feet, the lot sizes would all still comply, the density is already underdense and would not cause any complication, it would bring it closer to compliance if any square footage was removed from the property. From an evaluation with the development standards this encroachment is not foreseen to cause any problems that would make a significant difference in the compliance of this project. Dalpay Estates 11 Short Plat File No.:LIJA-03-125, SHPi,-H, ECF April 13, 2004 Page 4 Paul Bartknecht, 3807 NE 19"' Street, Renton, 98056 stated that he had several issues, one when Dalpay I was developed Ms. Bledsoe was notified by mail, on this current project she was not notified. The issue here is the nine large trees that sit behind the garage. One tree is six feet from the back of the garage, it is 8 feet in diameter and 3 feet from the roofline of the garage. It will be very difficult to remove a tree that is so close to the garage. Mr. Barfknecht showed several pictures of the nine trees that are bordering the subject site and stated his concerns with their removal. The property was purchased in 1992 and nothing has changed since that purchase. There is also a concern about some additional trees that are slated to be removed, there is some doubt as to whether those trees are actually on the Dalpay property. Another adjacent property had an apple orchard on it and several trees. The Examiner inquired about the hammerhead driveway that will require the removal of these trees, if that could be moved, it appears that Lot 2 or 3 could have room with an alternate configuration. M_s. Catlin stated that she would have to confirm with the Fire Department, it is possible that it could be inverted so that the hammerhead portion went onto Lot 2 rather than Lot 3 while still providing a hammerhead at the same distance into the property that is now shown. Mr. Barfknecht further stated that there is a cyclone fence that goes along the side of his property. The concern is that if a road is built over the tank, how will the fence be protected. When the houses across the street were built and the cement work was done, the crew cleaned their tools and flushed the wash down the drain. Now there is cement in the drains. The tank seems that it should be cleaned out before the new houses are built and more cement goes down the drains. Mr. Dales stated that they would not be next to the garage, which is actually an add -on to a garage. The plat would have no connection to the garage. Kayren Kittrick, Development Services Division, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. She indicated that as part of the construction that would be required with the particular short plat, an inspection by the maintenance group would be required of the state and condition of this vault and it would be required to be cleaned at that time. It will be noted that maintenance will go take a look at the tank immediately. The hammerhead that is shown on this particular plat is a non-standard design. It meets the design requirements from the Fire Department but there are other designs that can be used. The Examiner asked if the road could be placed along the west side of the property, what would that do to the bottom two lots as to where they have or do not have access. Mr. Kittrick stated that it could be moved, it has been looked at, however, Lot 5 would be lost with that change. Aleanna_Kondelis, Cramer Northwest, Inc., 945 N Central, Suite 104, Kent, WA 98032 wanted to submit that the Homeowners Association in Dalpay Estates I has current restrictions to maintain and keep that vault up to standards. There will be a cooperation to come up with a new Homeowners agreement, it is important that the new development be brought into the loop on maintenance, restructuring, etc. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at H :14 a.m. FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: Dalpay Estates 11 Short Plat . File No.:LUA-03-125, SHPL-H, ECF April 13, 2004 Page 5 FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Dalpay and Associates, filed a request for approval of a Short Plat. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official, issued a Determination of Non -Significance - Mitigated (DNS-M). While short plats are generally exempt from environmental review the subject site has both sensitive and protected slopes making it subject to review. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 3801 NE 19th Street. The subject site is located on the south side of 19th between Shelton Avenue NE on the east and Queene Avenue on the west. 6. The subject site was annexed to the City in May 1960 with the adoption of Ordinance 1827. 7. The subject site is zoned R-8 (Single Family; 8 units/acre). 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of single-family uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The subject site is approximately 2.52 acres or 110,206 square feet in size. The parcel is approximately 640 feet (north to south) deep by approximately 172 feet wide. 10. A building located on the site east of the subject site encroaches into the subject site. 11. The site slopes down from the north to the south around a ravine or swale. The site is essentially level for its first 200 feet from NE 19th Street and then drops at approximately 25% slopes and even more steeply to greater than 40% slopes. The 25% slopes are defined as sensitive and the slopes 40% are protected. 12. An existing single family home was removed from the site in 2001 and the site is now vacant and covered with shrubs, grasses and a variety of trees. 13. The area is predominantly developed with single-family uses. A new single plat north of the subject site was developed by this applicant. That development created a detention system on the subject site that was intended to serve both that adjacent site and the subject site. 14. The applicant proposes dividing the parcel into five lots. There would be a new private street running north to south along the east edge of the parcel. It would then narrow to an easement driveway. The new roadway would end in a hammerhead turnaround for emergency access and onsite maneuvering. 15. The proposed lots would be stacked north to south across the width of the parcel. Proposed Lot 1 would be the northernmost lot. It would be 60 feet deep and approximately 172 feet long. Proposed Lots 2, 3 Dalpay Estates II Short Plat File No.:LUA-03-125, SHPL-H, ECF April 13, 2004 Page 6 and 4 would each be approximately 50 feet wide by the same 172 feet long. Proposed Lot 5 would be the largest lot and encompass the steep sloped areas. It would be approximately 420 feet deep and, again, 172 feet long. Proposed Lot 1 is approximately 10,320 square feet, while Proposed Lots 2, 3 and 4 are all just over 8,600 square feet. Proposed Lot 5 is approximately 72,332 square feet. 16. In order to develop the lots and access ways, the applicant proposes removing 16 trees of 33 located outside of the slope areas. Trees within the steep sloped areas will be retained in a native growth protection easement. 17. Staff noted that NE 19th Street does not provide standard width and that the applicant will have to dedicate 10 feet along the frontage to widen the street. The applicant will also have to provide standard frontage improvements including curb, gutter and sidewalk. 18. As noted above, the applicant proposes a private road that will be 26 feet wide and have 20 feet of paving. The road would then narrow to 20 feet as it enters Proposed Lots 4 and 5 where it would become a private driveway. Staff has recommended that the applicant restrict parking on the private access ways to permit access by emergency services. In order to reduce the number of adjacent curb cuts, staff recommended that Proposed Lot 1 be restricted to access via the easement roadway. 19. The site is located in the Renton School District which assigns students on a space available basis. The proposed development would generate approximately two additional school students. 20. Density is calculated after subtracting the private roadway, the street dedication and the critical areas, in this case, slopes. Code generally requires a density of between 5 and 8 units per acre but does allow reductions when environmental or physical constraints limit development potential (Section 4-2- 110D.1.b). As proposed, the density of the plat will be approximately 2.89 units per acre. 21. The development will generate a total of approximately 50 vehicle trips per day. 22. As noted above, the subject site has already developed a stormwater detention vault that serves a neighboring property. The applicant proposes developing the private roadway over the vault. The Fire Department has required that the vault be able to withstand the loading of a 30-ton vehicle with a 322- psi point loading. The site will have to comply with the Department of Ecology's erosion measures of their 2001 manual. 23. The subject site is located in Aquifer Protection Zone 2. 24. The subject site will receive domestic water and sanitary sewer service from the City. 25. The neighbor with the encroaching building is concerned that development will not harm their property rights. Staf noted even if there is a lot size reduction due to the encroachment, there is sufficient area to permit the development of five lots. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed division of the subject site appears to serve the public use and interest. The development both increases the stock of additional lots for housing choices while preserving the environmentally sensitive steep slopes. The proposed density of 2.89 units per acre is appropriate given the acreage constrained by the steep Dalpay Estates II Short Plat File No.:LUA-03-125, SHPL-H, ECF April 13, 2004 Page 7 slopes. In addition, the applicant has to provide both dedicated right-of-way along 19th as well as a private roadway. The proposed five lots is sufficient given these limitations, The proposed short subdivision creates new single-family lots in an area where urban services are available. The development provides for a variety of lot sizes including the large lot with the natural ravine and vegetation. 4. The ERC required the payment of mitigation fees that will help to offset the impacts of the additional housing on parks, traffic and fire services. The applicant will be required to provide erosion control measures specified by the Department of Ecology. This should help protect the ravine and downstream watercourses. The applicant will have to work around the neighboring encroachment but the City is not in a position to deal with the two parties' legal issues or uncertainties. In conclusion the proposed Short Plat appears reasonable in light of the constraints found on the subject site. DECISION: The six -lot Short Plat is approved subject to the following conditions: The applicant shall comply with all of the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee. The portion of the proposed private street crossing Lots 1-3 shall be posted with "No Parking — Fire Lane" prior to short plat recording. A note shall be placed on the face of the short plat requiring Lot I to take access from the private street. 4. A homeowner's association or maintenance agreement shall be established for the maintenance of the private street and shared utility improvements prior to short plat recording. The applicant shall dedicate a 10-foot strip along the north property line of the site as right-of-way prior to short plat recording. ORDERED THIS l3th day of April 2004. FRED J. KAUF N HEARING EX A INER TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of April, 2004 to the parties of record: Kristina Catlin Jim Dalpay Susan Bledsoe 1055 S Grady Way P.O. Box 2436 26828 Maple Valley Highway 4282 Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98059 Maple Valley, WA 98038 Dalpay Estates 11 Short Plat File No.:LUA-03-125, SHPL-H, ECF April 13, 2004 Page 8 Kayren Kittrick Paul Barfknecht 1055 South Grady Way 3708 NE 19"' Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98056 TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of April 2004 to the following: Mayor Jesse Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Members, Renton Planning Commission Larry Rude, Fire, Deputy Chief Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Transportation Systems Division Utilities System Division Janet Conklin, Development Services King County Journal Aleanna Kondelis Cramer NW, Inc 945 North Central Kent, WA 98032 Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Admin. Neil Watts, Development Services Director Alex Pietsch, Econ. Dev. Administrator Larry Meckling, Building Official Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Julia Medzegian, Council Liaison Jennifer Henning, Development Services Patrick Roduin, Development Services Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section I OOGof the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., April 27, 2004. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in Judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 110, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. An appeal must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m., April 27, 2004. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants, the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision -maker concerning the proposal. Decision -makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. -- --- --� -- - --oD �- -��=-����---- ----'--s' [S -'--- _ --- 95[6 /1� ca no CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP/Strategic Planning Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (x6581) Subject: Hoquiam Annexation - 60% Direct Petition to Annex Exhibits: Issue Paper 60% Direct Petition King County Certification Document Al N: For Agenda of: 12.2005 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution....:...... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . Recommended Action: Approvals: Council concur in setting the public hearing for Legal Dept......... September 26, 2005 Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Council received a 60% Direct Petition on July 12, 2005, to annex approximately 20.49 acres of unincorporated King County located within Renton's Potential Annexation Area. The proponent's petition was certified on August 1, 2005 as having signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. Under state law, if the Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition, it is required to hold two public hearings on future zoning. The site is currently designated Residential Single Family (RS) on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and would be zoned R-8, eight units per net acre, consistent with this designation, if it is annexed into the City. The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent Package to the Boundary Review Board if Council decides to accept the 60% Direct Petition. The City, at that time, may decide whether to invoke the Board's jurisdiction and request expansion of the proposed annexation's boundary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council set September 26, 2005, for a public hearing to decide whether to accept the 60% Direct Petition to annex as well as future zoning for the area, if it does. Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh ��y O ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 2, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: '� I,) Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor �` FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator Yod STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (6581) SUBJECT: Hoquiam Annexation - Acceptance of 60% Direct Petition to Annex and Support for Future R-8 Zoning T.Q.4T TR• Should the City Council wants to accept the 60 % Direct Petition to Annex for the Hoquiam Annexation now that the petition has been certified as sufficient by the King County Department of Assessments? If Council decides to accept the 60 % Direct Petition to Annex, whether future zoning should be R-8, consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan land use designation? If Council decides to accept the 60 % Direct Petition to Annex, whether it wishes to authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board? Whether the City should invoke jurisdiction during the Boundary Review Board's 45- day review period, in order to expand the annexation's boundaries to include those properties with covenants to not oppose future annexation as well as other properties to the east to 148' Avenue SE, in order to create a more coherent interim city boundary? RECOMMENDATION: The Administration recommends that Council: • Accept the 60 % Direct Petition to Annex for the 20.49-acre Hoquiam Annexation site; • Adopt the recommendation of the Administration to support R-8 zoning, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan RS land use designation on the site; h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\hoquiam\60% direct petition issue paper.doc Teri Briere, Council President Page 2 of 3 September 12, 2005 • Authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package for the Hoquiam Annexation to the Boundary Review Board; and, • Refer the issue of invoking jurisdiction and expansion of the annexation area to the east to the Planning and Development Committee for review and recommendation. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: At its April 25, 2005, public meeting, Council accepted the 10 % Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition and authorized circulation of a 60 % Direct Petition to Annex. Council at that time specified that petitioners agree to support future zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation and assume their proportional share of the City's outstanding indebtedness upon possible future annexation to the City. Except for parks, reviewing staff identified no other issues. Because of nearby wetlands and the potential for flooding, however, future development likely will be required to mitigate potential impacts to surface water. The City received the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for this revised annexation on July 12, 2005. The petition was certified by the King County Department of Assessments as having signatures representing at least 60 % of the area's assessed valuation on August 1, 2005. Council is now being asked to decide whether it wishes to accept the 60 % Direct Petition to Annex, and if it does, what the future zoning of the site should be if the Boundary Review Board approves it and it is subsequently annexed into the City. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation for the subject site is Residential Single Family. This designation allows R-8 zoning at eight units per net acre. King County currently has R-4 zoning on the site, which allows four units per gross acre, and with bonuses, allows up to six units per net acre. Pursuant to GMA and the Countywide Planning Policies regarding the creation of more efficient service areas and the reduction of duplication of services, both the City and County have the authority, under state law, to invoke Boundary Review Board's jurisdiction and request that it modify the annexation's proposed boundaries. Because the City currently has covenants to annex for two development projects to the northeast of the annexation site as well as a desire to consolidate its boundary on the east abutting the Urban Growth Area boundary, the Administration is recommending that the Council authorize it to invoke the Board's jurisdiction, if it accepts the 60 % Direct Petition and authorizes sending the Notice of Intent package to the Board. At a minimum, staff is recommending that the boundaries be expanded east to at least 148' Avenue SE. It might also be advisable to ask the Board to expand the boundaries all the way east to the City's existing boundary south of SE 120`' Street, the Urban Growth Area boundary (see attached map). A more detailed discussion of this proposed annexation and review comments was contained in the department's April 4, 2005 10 % Notice of Intent issue paper. h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\hoquiam\60% direct petition issue paper.doc Teri Briere, Council President Page 3 of 3 September 12, 2005 CONCLUSION: The proposed Hoquiam Annexation has been certified as having signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. It also has reasonable boundaries and appears to comply with all relevant Boundary Review Board objectives. Reviewing staff raised no significant objections to this annexation. Community Services, however, indicated a general deficiency in the area of parks and estimate a one-time parks acquisition and improvement cost of $77,877 for the original annexation area. This is based upon an estimated future population of 313 people, living in 125 dwelling units, at build out. Staff estimates revenues to the City of approximately $7,713 per year at build out in today's dollars. Based upon the above and the previously submitted analysis in the 10 % Notice of Intent issue paper, staff concludes that the proposed Hoquiam Annexation would further the City's business goals, be consistent with its Comprehensive Plan, and be in the general welfare and interest of the City. h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\boquiam\60% direct petition issue paper.doc 00 _7t F_ TPM F toL-M --7, St 1 � L Ive-liffilr9l ill Uwe raw III, I MEN= IVnd W"i 9 c- C_ —LI I I IJ 44 H DOI- Proposed Hoquiarn Annexation Jgure 1: Vicinity Map Site Boundary City Limits Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Alex Pietsch, AdministratorG G. Dcl Rosario o 1 March 2005 n d Q C3 O W p o�3 roposed Hoquiam Annexation figure 3: Existing Structures Map Site Boundary City Limits o� �t Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning *®• Alex Rh, Administrator Existing Structure G. Dell Rososario �L�NTO� 1 March 2005 6 26 X - �. ,40.16 X . \, 5 ;\ - X - %�< X d X 3.9 43 52 < 142 57 qa - X ! X ` X .EX 5 5.04 146. 5 \\_ 1-2 27 �\� X Y. Xte 47 X'35.E, X ' 62.E J : X j 35, Xp \� \ I X' 46 _ x X143.39 14256 �\ Xd '' 142.37 \ X \j ; � \ Xt4.64 i XI .t9 X 142.17/ 141.72 (/\ 141.60 1 .\ \\ \ / X X14 .18 X141.16 \\ 4 \ X141.28 \ /I\ X X X \ / / X1 .68 X \ \ X t42.29 X X 140.55 1 142.47 /{ X 135. X 1 X X 139.t0 / i / 1 UZ24 136.90 140.55 X 140.22 X X 137.62 ! 41.4 140.82 X \ \ / X X\ 141.6 X . 139.73 I 13626X X 141.16 137.62 1\ \ \ \ \ \ 422 X X1J9.99 X X t .58 { X 136.19 41,65 39.T7 8X X 139.65 7.45 737.31 \' X X ))) X 140.64 X I .77 X \ \ / 139.85 t3 1 1 t X �a0.53 X 1. 5.52 139.81 I W X I 38.6J 9 \ X 1 0.49 X 137.41 138.41 X X 1 X 1 .87 37.6 /36.78 X1 4. X 8.84 C\ �j 5.2 I X 137.8 1 O X1 9,99 X 139.99 / I X137.80 X \ \ X 18.68 \ 12 27 _- X \ 1 9.Sfi % 138.11 1 138.55 13 .52 9.23 38.1 139.12 X / I ; X 139 22 X X 1 2.76 \ X 139.12 13839 2.27 j 13 3 X 8.27 X X 139.70 8.69 122`93 X \ l 1 X 139.53 3 X IX9.4 12J.3sX\`�Iz3slX1 i 246 ---- X 1i X \ X 138.33 i \ X 21.8 ' j ' X .� / r �1f ! / t39.68 X'39.59 ,,proposed Hoquiam Annexation figure 4: Topography Map Site Boundary - - - City Limits \ SSY o Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning � g g ----- Alex Pietsch, AdminisS trator 1 m Interval Contour *•` G. Del Rosario �ANTO� 1 March 2005 HOQUTAM ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET Reve is is es . sts' Units Population AV Existing dev. 20 50 $5,109,000 Full dev. 125 313 $41,859,000 Assumptions: 2.2 persons / household $255,450 AV / existing unit $350,000 AV / new unit Existing Full Rate Regular le $16,042 $131,437 3.14 Excesslevy $402 $3,291 0.07861 State shared revenues Rate (per cap) Existing Full Liquor tax $3.52 $176.00 $1,101,76 Liquor Board profits $5.04 $252.00 $1,577.52 Fuel tax - roads $14.46 $723.00 $4,525.98 Fuel tax - arterials $6.47 $323.50 $2,025.11 MVET $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Camper excise $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Criminal justice $0.36 $18.00 $112.68 Total $1,492.50 $9,343.05 Miscellaneous revenues Rate Existing Full Real estate excise* $48.57 $2,428.50 $15,202.41 Utility tax** $133.20 $2,664.00 $16,650.00 Fines & forfeits* $17.53 $876.50 $5,486.89 Total $5,969.00 $37,339.30 * Per capita ** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate Per capita Existing Full Contracted Services Alcohol $0.19 $9.50 $59.47 Public Defender $4.68 $234.00 $1,464.84 Jail $8.56 $428.00 $2,679.28 Subtotal $671.50 $4,203.59 Court/legal/admin. $66.92 $3,346.00 $20,945.96 Parks maintenance* $14.90 $745.00 $4,663.70 Police $276.89 $13,844.50 $86,666.57 Road maintenance** N/A $0.00 $4,894 Fire*** $1.25 $6,386.25 $52,323.75 Total $24,993.25 $173,697.57 * See Sheet Parks FIA ** See Sheet Roads FIA *** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract) i hd4lrrie osts> Parks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA) Other one-time costs: Total revenues Existing $239©538 Full ':$1$1=41015 Total ongoing costs Existing $24 5:53 5. Full $173� � 57 .................... Net fiscal impact Existing a8s7 Full $771258 $77,452.00 $425.00 Total one-time costs:$77$77( Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo 4-05-00a c"'WTITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON JUL 0 7 2005 UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 RECEIVED (60% Petition Hoquiam Annexation) CTO: TES 6f rlf,� COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Applicant; Telephone No.?. V-AO - 00 The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton. We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 et seq. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of this petition. In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW 35A.14.120 on April 25, 2005. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree to: (1) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the subject property consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and (2) Assume their proportional share of the City's outstanding bonded indebtedness. all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of such meeting. WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask: (a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and (b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the above described territory to become part of the City of Renton, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, and to receive City public services. This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures. WARAM. Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or Page 1 of 2 Hoquiam Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names ofpetidoners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the drain of title to the real estate.) 1�'Ikir�fV47 T'"_.� .k• r. � 3"ii r�l'-��'�• iil-$ICI; liiilNW+s�I:%.4iVe+L. upig s yx�, yT�3"j.,<k—'ii�re ",.ta t t;.�°i T,i t `� iJ:iy.. 1 [G 's:s 't {: e.o ',. r i'�YP�'!�'�/�},t�, C e � r T"?'1.,�,4I. ��Lt� 3' 1I'�^� � ibuliNHrrntri r.a.' Yw,J.:✓�L:L�fu..ail�l,4NL1TY:i.IY�� 'o ,• ` .!. 1Ai n C n..e r 1 I ✓. f:f;C1 y �y r d L " v .�Y7 }"Sr! Pn ] a r• f Y ! y t �.-i!J ti° s�°n t7 !}}7 }ir!� ix.�s` �/) rT;� f�7�ry14:�.i., �x iJ+w�� 'CIS: I '2 ItlIJ.WF G�S�'.er`` '*c��'it'�'rS. Y'•i.1 t3�MKM1 7 is L..4.��' y Renton,98059 r I .► r 4, f J f i v i � r � � I - ♦ w • I • r A 1 Page 2 of 2 Hoquiam Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.) f 'a x of LegalNi . 4, Snafu andQika!'Iatl�ng Descrlptiou lejtes P' tad amp�d?� _ . s�f' �i- ) 40, :fix 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. (Y Page 2 of 2 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition. (Names ofpetitioners should be in identical form as the name that appears on record in the title to the real estate.) f.J`t.S.Y2r31'i`"„`..t a3s�L�° �`s �'�.Ni4 `Y% "�': ,i .::ij,h .r`-t T:-.kW �,w�..� Y-v S Qt.gaA ii Vi.��y'ss5 )t }�tedmefvrter r' .i a�tsl,.e`,g: d - i' 3� °a1iL1 oft .TS ..5F 3F` '. tk SCIiSS y ,� #- 3 DE SG3i3tioI1" { ' I�SSeSS( Ci zZ ignadflro , MeR>Ycgro�'-' ,PUP h apeytt��sti� 1 t r to , tiT Q S f s.£ Area '.Xi .��7s I LUC)& 'SE t a� 5 - 1(9 a 3 05 �� dov 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Page 2 of 2 H:\DIVISION.S\P&TS\PLANNINGWNNEX\10% Notice of Intent (rev's).doc\DE 02/01 /05 Exhibit 2 HOQUTAM ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the south half (1/2) of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington, lying northerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4924; TOGETHER WITH the south 30 feet of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 10, said south 30 feet also being known as SE I22nd Street; and TOGETHER WITH the south 30 feet of the west 30 feet of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 10, said parcel also being known as a portion of SE 142nd Street. King County Department of Assessments King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue, Room 708 Seattle, WA 98104-2384 (206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595 Email: assessor.info@ajnetrokc.gov www.metrokc.gov/assessor/ Scott Noble Assessor ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted July 12, 2005 to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson, Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to Renton of the properties described as the Hoquiam Annexation, has been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002. The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to be the case. Dated this 1st day of August, 2005 Scott Noble, King lounty Assessor ('I I-Y OF RIA'IN(J11—M"I"NDA Ili IH. Submitting Data: I kpt, Div, Board.. Finance & IS Department Staff Contact...... Michael E. liailcy, Administrator Subject: Update of Resolution "Authorizing Signature for Depositories and Electronic Fund Transfers on Behalf ol' and in the Name of the City of Renton" Exhibits: Resolution For- Agenda of: September 12_, 2005 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Ilearing.. Correspondence - Ordinance. ............ Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... X 0 Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... X Council concur Finance Dept...... X Other ............... Fiscal Impact: S0 Expenditure Required... Transfer,Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... "Dotal Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The proposed Resolution updates Sections 1, IV, and VI of Resolution 3737. Section I identifies the authorised signers for "pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments in the name of the City of Renton." In Section I, the proposed Resolution adds Michael E. Bailey, Finance & Information Services Administrator, as the second authorized signer. Section IV identifies the individuals that are "authorised to initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purposes of'disbursing and depositing City Funds for the purposes of investing, cash management, and accomplishing authorized City business in the City's name." The proposed Resolution adds Michael E. Bailey, Finance & Information Services Administrator, and adds Hang Parkinson, Finance Analyst Supervisor, with "Initiate" and "Approve" authority for the purposes described under Section IV. Section VI states the effective date of September 15, 2005, for the changes to Sections I and IV. It also repeals Resolution No. 3737. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the proposed Resolution that updates Sections I, IV, and VI of' Resolution 3737. 11 1 IN N\( f NUMASI P f I I \pcndafilIIs ♦ Cc OI I]Orl ttivielr ALItPwriird 1 11aturr, Scpl 'Irnti dog CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RE, NTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE FOR DEPOSITORIES AND ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS ON BEHALF OF AND IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, the City of Renton maintains one or more accounts at one or more qualified public depositories, including the state operated Local Government Investment Pool for primary banking, investing, or third party trust agreement purposes; and WHEREAS, the City's appointed Finance & Information Services Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to open and maintain these accounts as required from time to time on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The depositories are hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments in the name of the City of Renton and signed by any one of the following officers and officials of the City of Renton: Title Mayor Name Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Finance & Information Services Administrator Michael E. Bailey SECTION II. Any of the above named officers or officials are further authorized to endorse any such checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing same into the City's accounts. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION III. The designated depository for the account in the name of City of Renton Municipal Court (Municipal Court account) is hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments signed by the Court Services Director or Municipal Court Judge. The Director or Judge are further authorized to endorse checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing the same into the Municipal Court account. Title Name Court Services Director Joseph T. McGuire Muncipal Court Judge Terry L. Jurado SECTION IV. The following individuals are authorized to initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purposes of disbursing and depositing City funds for the purposes of investing, cash management, and accomplishing authorized City business in the City's name: Title Name Initiate Approve Finance & Information Services Administrator Michael E. Bailey Yes Yes Fiscal Services Director Linda Parks Yes Yes Finance Analyst Supervisor Cindy Zinck Yes Yes Finance Analyst Supervisor Bang Parkinson Yes Yes Finance Analyst Linda Dixon Yes No SECTION V. There shall be no obligation on the part of the depositories to see the application of funds in any case whatsoever, and that a true copy of this resolution be certified and delivered to each said depository at the time any such account is opened on behalf of the City of Renton. 2 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION VI. Effective September 15, 2005, Section I and Section IV of Resolution No. 3737, which was passed and approved on February 7, 2005, is hereby repealed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.I 133:9/8/05:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 3 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL 4 Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems September 12, 2005 Staff Contact...... Ryan Zulauf, Ext. 7471 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Subject: Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Airport Layout Plan Contract with URS Corporation Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... X Exhibits: Study Sessions...... Issue Paper Information......... Scope of Work Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee. Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $ 129,257.19 Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... $ 200,000.00 Revenue Generated......... $ 150,000.00 Total Project Budget $ 200,000.00 City Share Total Project.. $ 13,111.00 SUNIMARY OF ACTION: The Airport Layout Plan is a planning document that the Federal Aviation Administration uses to determine future Airport funding needs. The Airport Layout Plan is updated about every ten years. The last update was in 1997 and is considered, by FAA standards, to be out-of-date. Future grants from the FAA will be unobtainable without a current Airport Layout Plan (ALP). The City executed a contract with Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc. to update the 1993 Airport Base Map, which will be used in updating the ALP. A Federal Aviation Administration grant of $150,000 has been obtained and will fund 90% of the project. The City's portion of the funding, $13,111, will come from the Airport Layout Plan CIP account, which has a remaining budget of $190,463.59. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the contract with URS Corporation in the amount of $129,257.19 to update the Airport Layout Plan. C:ADocuments and Settings\mneumannALocal SettingsV'remp\ w bill URS Contiact.doc PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IZ� �OV M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 12, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler FROM: Gregg Zimmerm,A__Z_ ministrator STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager, x7471 SUBJECT: Airport Layout Plan Contract with URS Corporation ISSUE: Should the City execute a contract with URS Corporation in the amount of $129,257.19 to update the Airport Layout Plan? RECOMMENDATION: Approve the contract with URS Corporation in the amount of $129,257.19 to update the Airport Layout Plan. BACKGROUND: The Airport Layout Plan is a planning document that the Federal Aviation Administration uses to determine future Airport funding needs. The Airport Layout Plan is updated about every ten years. The last update to the Airport Layout Plan was in 1997 and is considered, by FAA standards, out-of-date. Future grants from the FAA will be unobtainable without a current Airport Layout Plan (ALP). The City executed a contract with Duane Hartman & Associates, Inc. to update the 1993 Airport Base Map, which will be used in updating the ALP. A Federal Aviation Administration grant of $150,000 has been obtained and will fund 90% of the project. The City's portion of the funding, $13,111, will come from the Airport Layout Plan Update CIP account, which has a remaining budget of $190,463.59. Attachments cc: Leslie Lahndt, Transportation Design Supervisor Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager Ryan Plut, Transportation Design Engineering Specialist Bruce Fisher, Airport Operations Specialist H_\Divisions\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\Rvan\Projects\Airport_ALP-CIP URS\iss paper I IRS Contract 2.doc EXHIBIT B-1 SCOPE OF WORK AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN SET and ALP NARRATIVE, REPORT STII RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT (INCLUDING WILL ROGERS-WILEY POST SEAPLANE BASE AIP Project Number: 3-53-0055-15 The airports listed above will be completing an ALP Update with Narrative Report. This update and report project will provide the airport, including the seaplane base with revised ALP drawings and a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as set forth in this Scope of Work. The ALP and CIP will provide the airport with a method and proposed schedule for correcting identified airport design deficiencies. It is the intent of this study to update existing drawings and provide a review of the existing and long range needs of the airport. The project shall be completed in conformance with standards, criteria and recommendations of the following: • FAA's Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5070-6A, Airport Master Plans. (Version 613 has been issued in draft form) • FAA AC 150/5300-13 (Changes 1 through 7), Airport Design — Appendix 7 for Narrative Report and ALP Drawing set. • FAA Order 1050.1 E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures. • FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook. FAA TERPS Order • FAA FAR Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace and FAA Order FAA Order 7400.2, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters • Other FAA Advisory Circulars, Orders, and Regulations as applicable to this study. This scope has been prepared to identify the goals of the project, define the work effort, estimated cost and anticipated completion schedule, as well as set forth the framework by which all parties will participate in the study. The ALP project will utilize the 2003 Washington System Plan Inventory Update, the existing 1997 Airport Master Plan, and the Airport Development Study completed in 2005 to augment data needs and the airport vision for the project. The work items to be included in the project are: An inventory of existing Facilities at the airport; Forecasts of future aviation demand levels utilizing projections from the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Aviation Division's Washington State Aviation System Plan (WSASP), FAA General Aviation Forecasts, and one other published growth rate such as population growth rate for Washington State. A determination of new Facilities required, and/or expansion of existing facilities that will be required to accommodate the projected activity; CJAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc Any existing or recommended facilities that do not meet FAA design criteria will be identified. Justification for a Modification to Standard or a reaffirmation of existing Modification(s) to Standard, if there is no other alternative, will be provided; A Capital Improvement Program that prioritizes and stages the proposed development during each year of the 5 and 10 year planning horizon and as a group for the 10 to 20-year planning horizon will be provided; Preparation of an updated ALP drawing set utilizing Computer Aided Design/Drafting (CADD) equipment; Completion of the work elements should result in: 1. Current ALP drawings that graphically depict existing conditions at the airport as well as proposed capital improvements. 2. A narrative report that describes the steps taken to arrive at the improvements shown on the ALP. Included will be Inventory, Forecasts, Facility Requirements, Development Plan, and Capital Improvement Plan. 3. A schedule of airport improvements correlated with an identified specific volume of activity, which would mandate action to accomplish the needed improvement. 4. A realistic and workable Capital Improvement Program that identifies items necessary to maintain/expand airport Facilities. GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc 2 ELEMENT 1 — STUDY INITIATION Task 1.1 —Refine Scope of Work, Budget and Schedule Consultant will develop a detailed Scope of Work, budget, and schedule to be made a part of the project contract fee negotiations and complete the FAA AIP Grant application. A detailed task -by -task itemization of the project budget and schedule will be provided. Product. The consultant will attend a scope review meeting with the client at the FAA offices in Renton, Washington. After this meeting a Project Manual will be prepared to guide project team members in communication protocols, schedule, budget and other issues required for successful project completion. The final Scope of Work which will be used to obtain an independent cost estimate for the project for use in contract negotiations. A breakdown of project costs for each element and task will be provided along with completed copies of the FAA AIP Grant Application. Task 1.2. Coordination and Control Consultant will assist the Airport Sponsor in identifying agencies and individuals that need to be contacted, informed of the study process and will provide background and technical information. Input received during the course of the Study will be compiled by City staff and presented in an appendix to the final report document. The consultant will assure that meetings necessary to conform to the guidelines of the FAA and the Airport Sponsor are conducted. Graphic displays will be prepared. It is assumed that there will be no public hearings or presentations to the general public. The Consultant will provide the Sponsor with monthly reports on the progress of the study. The monthly reports will be in email format and address work completed to date, work in progress, next steps and any unresolved issues. The Consultant will be required to attend one setup meeting with the Sponsor, three review meetings with the City's team and participate in a presentation to the Renton Airport Advisory Committee Product: A channel of communication with agencies and individuals that should be involved during the Airport Layout Plan Set and ALP Narrative Report Study. G:\WORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc ELEMENT 2 — INVENTORY EXISTING CONDITIONS Task 2.1 — Evaluate Existing Documents Consultant will review and evaluate existing documents, previous planning studies and airport records, as provided by airport management, including data pertaining to based aircraft, historic aviation activity, construction programs, FAA Grants and financial information. In addition, local land use patterns and zoning regulations will be collected and evaluated as they relate to the airport. Existing data is available through the 2003 Inventory Update of the Washington State Aviation System Plan, the 1997 Airport Master Plan, the 2002 Airport Business Plan, and the 2005 Airport Development Study. Product: A summary of existing documents andprevious planning efforts for input to future tasks of this study. Summaries of based aircraft by type, Airport Reference Code (ARC) and weight, and of historical aviation activityfor the last 5 years. A summary of previous plan recommendations and the disposition or implementation status of the previous recommendations will also be provided. Task 2.2 — Obtain Aerial Photography Consultant will purchase the most recent available aerial photography of the airport and surrounding area for the purpose of planning evaluations. Product: Aerial photography for the airport with electronic copies on diskette will be provided to the City. Task 2.3 — Inventory Airport Facilities Consultant will utilize the inventory data, including an examination of plans, construction drawings, lease documents, utility information and other relevant documents, as provided by airport management. An on -site inspection of major components of the airport will also be performed. The examination will include a determination of the facility's use, type, size, condition, adequacy, and the extent it meets or exceeds FAA standards. The facilities that will be inventoried and the data that will be provided include but are not limited to the following: 1. Airfield Pavements, including an update to the 2002 Pavement Conditions Index (PCI) report, described under Task 8.5. 2. Airfield Lighting and Navigational Aids. 3. Fixed Base Operator (FBO) Services. 4. Fuel Facilities — Storage and dispensing locations, tank capacities and condition, spill containment provisions. 5. Airport Access Roads and Auto Parking. GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc 4 6. Utility Systems — Key components of utility systems, including water, sewer, electric and telephone will be identified. 7. Perimeter Fencing — The adequacy of airport perimeter fencing and access to the airport operations area will be examined along with Phase II of the Airside/Landside Project (already designed) to ensure efficient airside/landside separation. 8. Building heights for major or controlling structures (completed under Task 8.1) Product: Tabulated airport facilities inventory for input to later tasks. Existing Conditions chapter of the report ALP Narrative document summarizing inventory data. All inventory data will be presented in narrative, graphic and tabular form as appropriate at the completion of this task. The updated inventory data will be presented in the form of a draft chapter for the Airport Layout Plan Update. GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc 5 ELEMENT 3 — AVIATION FORECASTS Task 3.1 — Update Existing Forecasts Consultant will use the WSDOT Aviation Division's Washington State Aviation System Plan, the FAA's Terminal Area (TAF) and General Aviation Long -Range Forecasts, and the Puget Sound Regional Airport System Plan, the 2005 Airport Business Plan forecasts and one other published growth rate forecast such as population growth as a baseline for a 20-year aviation activity forecast. Extensive forecast methods will not be conducted but the rationale for selecting the recommended forecasts will be clearly stated in the report. Forecasts of aviation activity will use the historical data recorded in the TAF for the year 2004 as the base and will be prepared in 5-year intervals for a 20-year planning period as follows: 1. Number of based aircraft (in terms of ARC; and single engine, multi -engine piston, multi -engine turbine, business jets, helicopters). 2. Number of annual general aviation operations (in terms of military operations and annual instrument approaches; itinerant and local operations; and VFR and IFR operations). 3. Mix of local vs. itinerant general aviation operations (in terms of approach category and design group and aircraft weight). 4. Identification of the fleet mix of general aviation aircraft expected to be based at or use the airport during the planning period. 5. Identification of existing and future critical aircraft, in terms of aircraft and ARC. Product: This chapter will discuss historic and forecast aeronautical activity levels. The forecast of aviation demand for the Renton Municipal Airport will be documented in narrative, tabular, and graphic form for use as a chapter in the Airport Layout Plan report. Details on the study's findings, identification of all assumptions used and documentation of the decision process used for making the final recommendation will be included in the report. The recommended forecast will be compared and contrasted with the current FAA TAF for RNT, as well as with the 2005 Airport Business Plan forecast. Because this data will become the basis for facility requirements analysis, the forecast and critical aircraft projections must be reviewed and accepted by the City and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) prior to completion of subsequent tasks. GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc 6 ELEMENT 4 — FACILITY REQUIREMENTS Task 4.1- Facility Requirements Determination Facility requirements and the role of the airport will be determined for the next 5-, 10-, and 20-year periods. The determination of additional facilities will be based on maintenance of the existing airport, compliance with governmental regulations including environmental issues and providing the facilities necessary to accommodate projected demand. Final recommendations will result from an analysis of FAA design criteria, knowledge of conditions at the airport and the desires of the airport sponsor. The following will be included: • Airport Reference Code and Critical Aircraft • Airfield Facility Requirements — This will include runways, taxiways, lighting and markings, and navigational aids. Printouts of the FAA "Airport Design Program" version 4.213 will be included for critical airfield dimensions. From this, a table will be developed showing those areas where current facilities are either in compliance with or are non -compliant with FAA standards. • Approach Area Requirements — This will include Runway Protection Zones and approach slopes associated with existing approach procedures. • Aircraft Storage Requirements — This will include all types of aprons, hangars and tiedowns for the storage of based and transient aircraft. Aircraft apron and parking areas suitable for long-term storage of large commercial aircraft will be identified. • Vehicle Parking and Access Requirements — This will include vehicle parking lots, and the internal airport surface access system. • Utilities and Drainage Requirements — This will include determining requirements for all service utilities (electricity, water, waste water, natural gas, and telecommunications lines). • Support Facilities — This will include requirements for the storage and distribution of aircraft fuel, facilities and equipment required for the maintenance of the airport and accommodation of emergency equipment. • Perimeter fencing/equipment. • Airport land. Preliminary planning for landside areas compatible with airport operations. • Minor Property Acquisitions. • Seaplane Base Improvements/ Terminal/ Maintenance to Navigation Product: Facility requirements for Renton Municipal Airport will be presented in tabular, graphic, and narrative form, as appropriate. Print-outs from the current version of the FAA Airport Design computer program for runway length requirements and dimensional design standards will be submitted to FAA and included as an appendix to GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc the draft and final reports as appropriate. The Declared Distances module from the Airport Design program vill be provided at the time of the ALP preparation (Element 5). Task 4.2 — Select Recommended Facility Requirements Using the "new" Facility Requirements identified under Task 4.1, alternatives will be evaluated on the basis of their efficiency in meeting the recommended requirement, estimated cost and ease of implementation, engineering difficulty, ability to comply with FAA airport design criteria, and environmental impacts. Product: As many as three airport development alternatives will be graphically depicted. New facilities needed as part of these alternatives will be prioritized based on the forecasts prepared at the time of the study. Improvements will be correlated with a specific volume of activity or change in the level of service that will require construction of the recommended improvement. as well as land and water areas required to support airport and seaplane base facilities. A table listing all deviations from current FAA design standards pertaining to the recommended ARC will be provided in the report as well as on the ALP drawing, including proposed disposition of the deviations. Disposition would entail recommended development and/or recommended FAA approval of modifications to standards. GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc ELEMENT 5 — AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN DRAWINGS The Airport Layout Plan (ALP) drawings will be created or revised to reflect existing and future land and facilities necessary for operation and development of the airport. All of the major development proposed in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) will be shown on the ALP in schematic form. The current FAA Seattle Airports District Office ALP Checklist (which is attached to this Scope of Work) will be used, to prepare the ALP drawings for this project. A completed checklist will be submitted to the FAA along with the ALP drawings when they are submitted for coordination. All items found in Appendix 7 of Advisory Circular 150/5300-13 Changes 1 - 8, form a part of this scope of work, unless otherwise approved. Task 5.1 — Update the Airport Layout Plan The ALP will be prepared to reflect updated physical features, wind data, location of airfield facilities (runway, taxiways, NAVAID'S) and existing terminal area development. Development of alternatives and ultimate airfield facilities will be based on short, intermediate, and long-range requirements which incorporate both airside and landside requirements. Appropriate wind rose data based on historical conditions will be annotated on the ALP (if available) as well as revised airport reference point coordinates. Product. An updated ALP Drawing (CADD-based) for the airport. Task 5.2 — Update the Building Area Plan(s) A building area plan for the seaplane base and general aviation areas plan(s) will be developed that reflect recommended development of future general aviation needs on the airport. This drawing may be combined with the Airport Layout Plan Drawing. Product. Updated building area plan projecting development of building areas at the airport, surface access, perimeter fencing, future T-hangar locations and future buildings. Task 5.3 — Update the Airport Airspace Drawing FAR Part 77 Utilizing the Inventory Update, the consultant will prepare an obstruction/approach zones, FAR Part 77 drawing. This drawing will show a plan view of all FAR Part 77 imaginary surfaces associated with current conditions at RNT. In addition, FAR Part 77 Surfaces associated with the proposed instrument approach will be analyzed. If any obstructions exist, they will be listed, the amount of penetration determined and their proposed disposition will be identified. Fifty -foot contour intervals will be shown for all FAR Part 77 imaginary surfaces for full length of all approach surfaces. Field surveys to accurately identify specific elevations or heights of obstructions are not a part of this study. USGS quadrangle maps may be utilized, but the use of a digital terrain model is preferred to better illustrate the location of Part 77 surfaces in relation to the topography of the City. Product. An obstruction/approach zone, FAR Part 77 drawing for the airport with a three dimensional view using a digital terrain model provided by the City. G:\WORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc 9 Task 5.4 — Update the Runway Protection Zone Approach Plan (RPZ) and Profile for Runway Drawings will be prepared that show the plan and profile of both the existing and proposed Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) for Runway 15-33. Any obstructions within the RPZ will be identified and a recommended disposition will be provided. Aerial photography will be used to develop these drawings. Runway profiles will be taken from existing maps. Product. A Runway Protection Zone/Approach Plan and Profile drawing that shows the RPZ's for each runway at the airport. Task 5.5 — Provide Full Approach Plan and Profile for Each Runway Drawings will be prepared that show the existing and full approach plan and profile for the approaches to each runway. Any obstructions within the approaches will be identified and a recommended disposition will be provided. City aerial photography showing ground elevations may be used to develop these drawings. This drawing may be combined with other drawings. USGS maps may be utilized. Product. An Approach Plan and Profile drawing that shows the approaches for each runway at the airport. Task 5.6 — Update the Existing Land Use Drawing An electronic drawing on an aerial will be prepared depicting existing and recommended land uses within the ultimate airport property boundary as well as land that is impacted by aircraft flight patterns. Noise contours will be generated using INM Model 6.2 for both existing traffic and that forecast for 20-years hence. Contours depicting 65, and 70 dnl levels will be shown on the land use plan to determine the aiprort's off -site impacts. Product: An electronic drawing that provides the Sponsor aplan for on -airport land uses, land acquisition areas and illustrates the off -airport areas affected by aircraft operations. Task 5.7 — Exhibit "A" Property Map Airport sponsors are required to prepare and maintain a current Exhibit "A" Property Map, which identifies the airport land dedicated for airport purposes and land acquired with Federal funds. An Exhibit "A" Property Map will be prepared based on information provided by the Airport. Product. - An Exhibit "A " Property Map depicting properties acquired with federal funding, if any, by applicable grant, , as well as other Airport property allocations as required. GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc 10 ELEMENT 6 — FINANCIAL EVALUATION The purpose of this study element is to establish a financial implementation program to provide the airport development requirements necessary to meet the projected aviation activity demands. Task 6.1 — Capital Improvement Program The Consultant will prepare an airport Capital Improvement Program (CIP) which will include a detailed 5-year CIP with recommended phases of development, estimates of cost for each improvement and a program implementation plan. The CIP will include estimates of the amount of funding eligible from FAA grant-in-aid programs, as well as other funding sources. A 20-year CIP will also be prepared evaluating proposed future projects, their estimated cost and potential sources of funding. The first 5-year program will be listed numerically in sponsor -priority order. Product: An evaluation of airport expenses and revenues at 5-year intervals will be compared to the CIP in order to identify a balanced approach for executing the program. GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc I I ELEMENT 7 — REPORTS AND DOCUMENTATION Task 7.1 — Interim Report To insure proper coordination of the planning effort and assure agreement between the consultant and the Sponsor, an Interim Report (Draft Phase I Report) containing the results of the inventory, forecast and facility requirements will be prepared prior to detailed development of the ALP. The Airport Layout Plan Set and ALP Narrative Report Study will be presented in the narrative and graphic form at a meeting with the Sponsor. This report will form the basis for agreement and recommendations by the Sponsor and coordination with the FAA. Forecasts will be submitted to the FAA for review and approval prior to formulation of the Interim Report. Product: Ten (10) copies of the Airport Layout Plan Set andALP Narrative Report Study update for the airport and ten (10) sets of `preliminary" ALP drawings will be provided. Task 7.2 — Final Report and ALP Drawing Set The Final Report and drawings for the Airport Layout Plan Set and ALP Narrative Report Study will be prepared for Sponsor acceptance and submittal to the FAA for coordination and approval. Product: Fifteen (1 S) copies of the "final " Airport Layout Plan Set and ALP Narrative Report Study reports, and ten (10) sets of full size 22 " by 34 " ALP drawing sets of the airport. Task 7.3 — Summary of Products to FAA (per FAA request) TASK Product: Working Paper/Draft Chapters Draft Final Report Draft ALP Print Sets & FAA Checklist Final Draft ALP Prints Final ALP Prints Final ALP (mylars/sepia) CADD File (final ALP set) NUMBER OF SETS 6 (FAA Airspace coordination) 2 (Sponsor/FAA approval set; color copies needed) 6 vWORK\RentonAScopeAFinal Scope.doc 12 ELEMENT 8 — MISCELLANEOUS Task 8.1 — Surveying, Elevations and Profiles Existing topographic maps will be used for developing all plans, however, the elevations of existing buildings will be measured to determine their heights relative to the FAR Part 77 Surfaces. Objects inside the RPZ and the Runway Object Free Area (OFA) will also be identified from existing maps and survey data. Extensive obstruction surveying will not be required. Profiles along runway centerlines and extended centerlines will be taken from existing construction documents. Measuring building heights will be done using the Impulse Laser Rangefinder. The Rangefinder is aimed at the building and takes the horizontal distance, then shoots the base of the building and follows with the top. Pressing the "fire" button the fourth time displays the object's height. All of this is accomplished without the use of a reflector target, therefore eliminating the need to physically stand on the top of the building. Accuracy The Impulse Laser Rangefinder has a vertical accuracy of +/- 0.1 degree. Accuracy therefore depends on the distance away from the building that the measurement is being taken, and the height of the building. For example, if the building is 100 feet tall, and the building height measurement is taken with the Impulse Laser Rangefinder at a distance of 100 feet away from the building, then the vertical accuracy will be around +/- 0.35 feet. . Task 8.2 — Travel to Airport It is anticipated that trips to the airport will be required to complete the studies. Trips will be scheduled as follows: To meet with the sponsor and become familiar with the airport and it's environment and set up preliminary meeting with Advisory Committee. 2. Inventory airport facilities. 3. Presentation of the interim report to include inventory, forecasts and facility requirements. An inventory and forecasts report will be submitted to the FAA prior to development of the facility requirements. 4. A presentation of the Preliminary Airport Layout Plan Set and ALP Narrative Report Study and Drawings. Task 8.3 — Environmental To meet State requirements, a SEPA checklist will be prepared based on information gathered as part of the Airport Layout Plan Update process and agency coordination efforts associated with obtaining SEPA approval will be included. It is anticipated that no additional scientific data creation will be required for completion of this task. GAW0RK\Renton\Scope\Fina1 Scope.doc 13 Task 8.4 — Checklist Fhe FAA Airport Layout Plan Checklist dated April 1997 and the Airport Layout Plan Narrative Report checklist dated April 1997 shall be completed, as they are applicable to the airport. Task 8.5 - Pavement Management As part of this task, URS will conduct a detailed inspection of all pavements at the Renton Municipal Airport that were not included in the recent PCI Update conducted by the WSDOT Aviation Division, evaluate the pavement condition, and develop a pavement management plan for the next six years. Research with WSDOT shows that the area that they have covered includes the runway and western parallel taxiway only. Therefore, our efforts will include all apron areas (both east and west side) and the perimeter roadway. The task will specifically include the following subtasks: 8.5.1 Review of data: URS will compile the pavement history, and develop pavement maps to serve as the basis for the remainder of the analysis. 8.5.2 Pavement Condition Index Survey: Under this subtask, URS will make a site visit(s) to visually observe the conditions of the identified pavements and record the conditions and signs of pavement distress. The survey will be conducted in accordance with the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method described in ASTM D5340 and as adopted by FAA (Advisory Circular 150/53 80/6A). 8.5.3 Update MicroPAVER Database: The pavement condition data collected (distress type and density) will be entered into the existing MicroPAVER database and PCI values of the pavement sections will be computed. Pavement condition ratings will be established for each pavement sections. 8.5.4 Pavement Condition Evaluation: Based on the data collected the existing conditions and the remaining life of the pavement sections will be evaluated. 8.5.5 Update Pavement Management Program: URS will update the airport's pavement management program to include all of the pavements that are the responsibility of the City.. URS will also develop a six -year pavement maintenance plan based on the updated pavement management program developed in this task as well as the information on runway and taxiway pavements from the WSDOT report. 8.5.6 Reporting: URS will prepare a written report summarizing the work completed, results obtained, and the conclusions made from the subtasks above. GAWORK\Renton\Scope\Final Scope.doc 14 Renton F P Update Renton Airport Airport Layout Plan Update . Budget Estimate and dget Estimate oject Mgr. ectect Manager ii. Airport Airport E�nvirn. Planner I Planner Engineer Planner Word i, Multiplier Rate Processing 2.80 Total Basic TOWI Cost Hrs. labor Cost 2.016 •'" u - - ... 40 1,800 - - - - - - - 40 1.800 5,040 ;., _. .'_-.:� 4 ...,..:. .:' _:-.. Subfaal� tip. �Q9kl 4,. 4,500; -:;.. -. - -> -. •. ,ay:�._,::-_: - - - - .ti"•; - 10,0 480A 2,4Q4 _-. � .9.8Sa ELEMENT 2 -INVENTORY EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 1 Review and Evaluate Existing Documents. Compi:e Existing Plans, Studies and Background Data 2 90 10 240 330 924 Summarize Findings and Recommendations of Existing Documents 2 90 16 384 - - - - - - - - 18 474 1,327 i 2.2 Obtain Aerial Photography _ _ 2 qg 2 48 134 2.3 inventory Airport Fadlities 2 20 161 384 - - - - - 18 404 1.131 2.4 On -Sae Fad:ily Inventory 8 360 24 576 - - - - - - - 32 936 2.621 2.5 Develop Base Maps 4 180 4 96 - - - 40 800 - - 48 F 1,07E 3,013 2.6 Produce Exist N Conditions Chapter 8 360 40 960 - - - - 4 80 - - 52 1,400 3,920 2.7 ELEMENT Draft Existing Condliorls Review and Comment 3 -AVIATION FORECASTS 4 180 12 288 - - - - 8 160 .... - 24 628 1,758 3.1 Update Existing Forecasts Co:!ect and Review Forecasts 6 Historical Data 4 180 16 384 - - - - - - - 20 564 1.579 Analyze Forecasts v. Actual Activity 4 180 8 - - - - 12 I 180 504 Develop Forecast Model, ARC and Critical Aircraft 2 90 12 288 - - - - - - - - 14 378 1,058 3.2 Produce Draft Forecast Chapter 2 90 24 576 - - - - - - - 26 666 1,865 _ mo Draft Forest Review 8, Comment (RNT) 2 90 4 96 - - - - - - 6 186 521 ELEMENT4-FACILITY Draft Forecast Review 6 Comment (FAA) y�Nk;1:.9Sa`Is REQUIREMENTS 4 -77 7 _B'-. 180 ,. 7:-8.1Q; 4 := 6, 96 :. ^;:,:. �ny40 - .:' .. .....: .: .......:- - ..:,.. - - z-•` - -.:'. - .- - 8 •_... 88 275 ,;:-:'22§� 773 .<.L..; fi,300; - 4:9%. 4.1 Fad!;ty Requirements Determination- 2,port Reference Code and Critical Aircraft 2 90 4 96 - - - - - - - - 6 186 521 AirIWO Requirements Approach Area Requirements 2 2 90 90 12 8 268 192 2 2 34 84 - - - - - - - - - - - 16 12 1 462 366 1,294 1,025 Aircraft Storage Requirements 2 90 12 2881 14 : 378 1,058 Vehide Pank�ng and Access Requirements UQLties and Dra,nage Requirements 2 2 90 90 4 4 96 r 96 16 672 - - - - - - - - _ - _ 6 22 186 858 521 2,402 Support Fa6:9�s 2 90 4 1 96 2 84 - - - - - 8 270 756 Perimeter Fencing!Equipment 2 1 90 2 48 - - _ _ _ - - 4 138 386 Airport LandR — Minor Property Acquisitions Other BuJding Areas and Land Uses 2 2 2 90 90 90 4 2 4 96 48 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 4 6 186 138 186 521 386 521 Seaplane Base Improvements 2 90 16 384 2 84 - - - - - - 20 558 1,562 4.2 Rewmmended Fad.ity Requirements 7 ;K2 )5 Renton ALP Budget Estimate • Ju.`y 2005.As I Budget Detail N k S /e ewf sell `"' P rO+0O S4 ( 1 or 2 Penton Ali Update get Estimate nr r,8 Renton Airport Airport La out Plan Update -- - y__. .._ Budget Estimate_ _- Project Manager Airport _.._ Airport Airport Envim. AutoCAD Word Multiplier Pier Rate Planner Technician Processing 2.80 Planner Planner Hrs. T122 Basic v Labor Total Cost % of Total Labor Hrs. Cost Hrs. Cost Hrs. Cost Hrs. Cost Hrs. Cost Hrs. Cost Afiematwes Analysis 8 360 12 288 2 84 - - - - - 732 2.050 Summary of ACematives 4 180 8 192 1 42 - - - - - 414 1.159 Summary of FacCy Requrements 8 360 24 576 - - - - - - - 936 2.621Faci:;y Requ;remenls/A9emalives Review and Comment 4 180 4 96 - - - - - - - - 276 773 ' Se�ect Recommended Fadlilies/Allematies4 180 4 96 - _ _ _ - _ _ 276 773 Coa late Future F,.:' y Requirements with Existing Facilities 4 180 8 192 - - - - - _ - 12 372 1,042 -+ Summarize Rawred Improvements and Planning Thresholds 4 180 8 192 - - - - - 12 372 1,042 - _ Prepare Impiementa8on Plan and Capital Requirements 4 180 12 288 4 168 - - - - - - 20 636 1.781 - a Final Fady Requ reme.nIs Rev ew and Comment _F-.' "," 4 180 8 192 2 84 - - 14 45 6 1,277 .. 'z -.•. ,-_ ; o_ r-'s".is .:„_ ...c_ -... ELEMENT 5 -AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN DRAWINGS 1'i -;-68' 3O60i `" 164.:-�r, 39 6 .. ,.-;33. _-:� 1176 - ,-�...-. :' - - - - - 'i.... :., I83�2 _-.:_ 23:470`� . . 5.1 AirportLayout Plan 4 180 20 480 - - - - 80 1.600 - - 104 2,260 6,328 5.2 Bui:ding Area Plan 2 90 8 192 - _ _ - 40 800 - - 50 1,082 3,030 5.3 Airport AjmPace Drawing - FAR Part 77 2 90 8 192 - _ - 24 4g0 - - 36 762 2,134 5.4 RPZ Plan and Prof:e Drawings 2 90 4 96 - - 24 480 - 30 666 1.865 5.5 Approach Plan and Pf0@'e for Each Runway 2 90 4 96 1 24 480 - - 30 666 1,865 5.6 Airport Land Use Drawing 2 90 4 96 - - - 24 480 - - 30 666 1,865 5.7 Fxh:bt A Property Map 2 90 4 96 - - 32 640 - 38 826 2,313 5,1 Pre'"urinary FAA Review S Comment 4 180 8 96 - - . 16 320 - 28 5961 1,669 ELEMENT 6 - FINANCIAL EVALUATION "(94ti7 " 6.1 ELEMENT Capital Improvement Program/20-Year CIP 7 -REPORTS AND IMPLEMENTATION 4 180 40 - 960 16 6-12 - - - - - - - 60 1,812 i 5,074 3,9% 7.1 7.2 Interim Report Fnzl Report and ALP Drawing Set 8 8 360 360 16 16 384 384 - 4 - 168 - - - 72 12 240 240 40 20 1,120 5601 76 60 2, 104 1,712 5.891 4,794 7.3 Summary of Products to FAA (per FAA request) '..<.,^._3<r- �-,�.� .. ELEMENT 8 -MISCELLANEOUS TASKS 8.1 Surveying, Elevations and Profiles 8.2 Travel to Airport - 3 - 10 - r.- r` 7 b1 - 450 - z's 32? 4 - _- ., .8 96 - '4 40 - $ 1,680 - - - - - _-ti': - - 24� 8 - 480 160 --_3e Os - - :'.'t• 8ot - 1 52 10 r" x 1,936 450 5,421 1,260 8.3 Environmental 2 90 2 48 - - 40 1.800 - - - - 44 1,938 5,426 8.5 PrePare FAA Cheddsts 4 180 8 192 - - - - - - - - 12 372 1,042 8.6 Pavement Management 8 360 20 ;;480 120 .160r 5,040 6;7pU - ;.i.iOc_-.1rE005.12;496 - 40 800 40 1,120 228 7,800 21,840 14 280 12,530 522 213 8,946 40 1,800 388 7,760 too 2,800 1,543 46,076 129,013 129,013 Expenses Travel 350 Printing 2,000 Courier , Soo Total Expenses 2,850 Total ALP Update Budget 131,863 Renton ALP Budget Estimate - Juty 2005.xis ! Budget Detail, 2 012 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL FAI a: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division September 12, 2005 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Robert Lochmiller, x7303 Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Subject: Correspondence.. Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements Ordinance ............. (Phase 2) Resolution............ Perteet, Inc. Supplemental Agreement No. 6 Old Business........ (CAG 01-071) New Business....... X Exhibits: Issue Paper and Attachment A Study Sessions...... Supplemental Agreement Information......... 2006-2011 TIP Project Sheet Recommended Action: Approvals: Legal Dept......... X Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Finance Dept...... Risk Management X Fiscal Impact: 317.12175.016.5950.0000.67.000000 Expenditure Required.. $ 99,880 Amount Budgeted....... $ 0 Total Project Budget $8,350,791 (2006-2011 SUMMARY OF ACTION: Transfer/Amendment.... $ 99,880 Revenue Generated....... $2,973,993 (Phase 2) City Share Total Project. $4,744,545 This supplemental agreement provides for the design work needed to complete plans, specifications and estimate (PS&E) plans for Phase 2 of the portion of roadway work in the vicinity of the I-405 location. The City has decided to construct the project in three phases: Phase 1 is starting construction in September on a signalized intersection and access road for the park; Phase 2 will construct the widening improvements along SR 169; Phase 3 will construct the remaining 250 feet of the eastbound right -turn lane into the park and the remaining parking lot improvements. Design work for this supplement includes: design Phase 2 to the new stormwater requirements; design this phase to be a stand-alone construction project; incorporate Phase 1 construction into existing conditions; gain approval from WSDOT on channelization; and, design Phase 2 to accommodate the maintenance building. The supplemental agreement is for $99,980 in addition to the initial contract work, which makes the total new maximum amount payable $970,657. The Transportation Systems Division is proposing a budget of $100,000 in 2006 for the project. A transfer of fiends is needed to complete this design work in 2005 instead, to allow for construction in 2006. Attachment A details funding transfers from programs/Droiects budceted in 2005. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 6 with Perteet, Inc. in the amount of $99,880. 11 Truns/Admin/Agendi 2005/050728 Agenda Bill Supp 46 TY N VO/ CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: September 12, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: ,)Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmermak dministrator STAFF CONTACT: Robert Lochmiller, Transportation Systems Design Project Manager, x7243 SUBJECT: Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements Perteet, Inc., CAG 01-071 Supplemental Agreement No. 6 ISSUE: Should the Council approve Supplemental Agreement #6 to the Perteet, Inc. agreement to complete the final plans, specifications and estimate for Phase 2 improvements? RECOMMENDATIONS: Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 6 with Perteet, Inc. in the amount $99,880. BACKGROUND: The design of the SR 169 widening improvements anticipated all improvements being constructed as a single project. The City went forth with a phased approach to complete the project due to funding issues with the full construction costs. Phase 1 involved the new signal and access road into the Cedar River Park. This portion of the project will start construction in September 2005. The funding has recently become available for the second phase of the project from the Transportation Improvement Board and Federal grants. The uncertainties of the Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council September 12, 2005 Page 2 Re: Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Improvements Project Perteet, Inc., CAG 0 1 -071 Supplemental Agreement No. 6 relocation schedule of the Park's maintenance building necessitated putting this second phase on hold. Transportation Systems Division now proposes to build the widening improvements in two more phases - Phase 2 and Phase 3. Phase 2 will construct the majority of the improvements along SR 169. The Parks maintenance building can then remain and our grant funds will not be lost due to pushing the construction schedule farther back than 2006. Phase 3 will construct the remaining 250 feet of the eastbound right -turn lane into the park and the remaining parking lot improvements after the vacation of the maintenance building. The Parks Department has agreed to this approach. This supplemental agreement is to complete the final plans, specifications and estimate for Phase 2. Design work includes: redesign Phase 2 to the new stormwater requirements; take the Phase 2 improvements out of the master plan and into a stand-alone project; indicate Phase 1 improvements as existing conditions for Phase 2; gain approval from WSDOT on channelization; and, design Phase 2 to accommodate the Parks maintenance building and allowing Phase 3 to be built at a later time. Approximately 25-30% of the cost for this work is attributable to accommodating the Parks maintenance facility requirements. Additional funding will be needed for design of Phase 3. This supplemental agreement is for $99,980 in addition to the initial contract work, which raises the total new maximum amount payable to $970,657. The Transportation Systems Division has budgeted $100,000 in 2006 for the project's design for Phase 2. A transfer of funds is needed to complete this design work in 2005 instead to allow for construction to be completed in the 2006 construction season. Attachment A details funding transfers from programs/projects budgeted in 2005. Attachments: Attachment A Vicinity Maps: 3 cc: Sandra Meyer, Director, Transportation Systems Division Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator Leslie Betlach, Director, Parks Department Leslie Lahndt, Transportation Design Supervisor Robert Lochmiller, Transportation Project Manager Sharon Griffin, Program Development Coordinator H \Division. s\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda 2005\SR 169 Supp 6Issue Paper Rev 2.doc Attachment A Fund 317 Transfer Maple Valley Highway (SR 169), Phase 2, Improvements Need: Design contract $ 99,880.00 Transfer: 8/10/05 2006-2011 Current 2005 Transfer New 2005 project # TIP # Project Reallocation Amount Allocation Comment 15 Project Development/ Predesign $ 175,000 $ (25,000) $ 150,000 12150 No consultant contracts expected through year-end. 17 Arterial Circulation $ 155,000 $ (39,880) $ 115,120 29 No consultant contracts expected through year-end. $ 830,000 12123 28 Duvall Ave. NE $ 850,000 $ (20,000) Project progress and billing allow for transfer. 31 Transportation Concurrency $ 40,000 $ (10,000) $ 30,000 12107 Consultant contract will be reduced. Out Interagency Signal Coordination $ 5,000 $ (5,000) $ - 12140 Program discontinued in 2006- 2011 TIP, 45 SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR 900 $ 1,366,100 $ 99,880 $ 1,465,980 12175 Required funding for redesign to phase demolition of Parks Maintenance facility. Total j $ 2,591,100 $ - $ 2,591,100 SGriffin\Budget\SR 169 Ph 2 Redesign Fund Transfer Aug 2005 Attachment A Fund 317 Transfer Maple Valley Highway (SR 169), Phase 2, Improvements Note: $100,000 "budgeted" in 2006 for the SR 169 project will be used to reimburse the above projects, as needed, in 2006. 8/10/05 SGriffin\Budget\SR 169 Ph 2 Redesign Fund Transfer Aug 2005 r LIDO tviC, �w u+ 8 q4r: C z N g O g� s rn �< z L" N Z A W 0f 0 i 1 I 1 I 1 i I 1 I I I I t 1 I 1 AND MAR t.0-m TL" 1M 4'A•PE�a I REDIf1 LANE Ne.J LANE W 4 ( 111 1111 (Ir Tl71 Rf• m' Rn IMf70rfIND I I I I, t_ t�1 r1 rir « 4. I r (IS' RT t 00' Rn ( I I I �I I I I I I 1 1 I rr rl e , AP. SIDLWNK >0 R 1 I 1 Ar 1Y , 17 AP. SIDEwA1R 42 n, 1 r scm DADP IANE LME (I. Rn ' I I I II I I I I Ir 711r1 1 11 I I I � Fn l 1 I 1 rrnn x I F 1�Y I �U 8 Cry GEgN TW WAY LM M IURN �� 1 M LMIE LRIE (1r LT) L EN l M LIE ftl TAPERS (Ir LT A 28' LT) R _- I la I MD WAY II W M DDUBU YELLM I I I > I STA 15JPl7 ASTIC i 1 PU511C TP.VM Ntl1( I 2t2 TV I � I I I SlA tJM«7L M L Lro 1ANE IJIE 11/' Ln I STA iD w I I I � c a wAu ui L- I I P ws c r ` eEaM Da1RLE ru7aw LM (Lv A D «7e Y I 1 END tRc lLAW UNE (' I 111111 1 NA SSW LWE (rL�i-sz9 Rn PLASDC CLOMWIR LM (x' LT - 4r Rp i '(., ._ 11 STONEWAY/CEDAR RM PARK ENTRANCE - ,p�.+ "' r SEE DRAWING CH 7 FAJ IMIE ui eEDM PL/SiIC wLDE tM (70' r KDRI YFiLDw EDDE LR6 (L' Ll a S' Rn -( lr/7 1 17' )NtlNitfllLw WE G I I25 = I r 1Y I 1 � ADP U.E S Li-42 L RaM LANE LJ1E (1r Lt) MATCHUNE STA 1541+00 KM ^'LSM WOE LME (JD• LT) ' SEE DRAWING No. CH5 PLASTIC TROPIC LETTERS 'ONLY" 16- 4A' #A co P;— CENTERUNE CURVE DATA PA. STAl10N DELTAWDIUS Imma IFIK'1. H SUPER13151ei.Y OJ'SE'le' e000ao' 300.3!' IOLM' "/A ISS].OeJ•1 el'ISbY eoo.ao' 3" ewll' IR Mtl_1J1N21 101OTI]' Sl.07 IIe.J]' 1e13!' IR SEC. 17 T. 23 N., R. 5 E., W.M. V MAP TAPER (E 1N5] p, 8 ta im yy ggg�gyyg ^ � U 'd' IA � rRDP. R/r `— z « AT�+CE Qi£4 a0:1 TAPaI — Sft-169UJ « UW — 141 ie.Ji rAAtTt — ,� �1 TAA�A1 f• }�. = ` w +« �N - - - - - - � --- b -- SST �� ---- --- - - w y g 0 E R €W^3? Syex ��y CHANNEUZATION NOTES: OI RAISED 11EIAEIO BALL OEE OE'TAl 0 dVlYeq 11� OIL O RACED 11MTEIC NHD. fEE ORAL E ORA11e1O 1.� OK O wow mwm m/+o. SEE OETIL r Mom w OIL OA'AeA1ED Ilovrlo ISIAIO. SEE OETAL . — _ 1 O 002ST.4 C�. I � R i Z • � � € � t5 i{1 aye+ i b NIX ®Perteet Engineering, Inc. J1vr asr bar. er,. 00 . a..M tl un . UNNTON car, E �f Al6ADOi T,R Wl14 )�_lla k A==—l'ee�.. NOTES: I. SEE ST-LL M II/el N-M FOR MYppR NelGll' OkTAAS. 2 tm �SAl"" IlAI1 .-J 111U H-]. FOR 1'MD1 1 D"W O RAe1r uAEs AM TXVM KWOIR.S m *E FOA M R m WSULLAnON a AW.pK.R 55gwC ♦. ALL Evdto UKL T o AWkM%. SWR U AA 005SROIA LRIES MALL BE IIERYE,WCRIIATE (WY). gg1 NEE SCALE CITY OF RENTON CH5 MAPLE VALLEY HIGMVAY (SR169) _ M.P. 22.98 TO M.P. 25.23 CHANNEUZATI(NJ PI AN V�K10 rt R0 < �U O cO A mm o a Z uv 0 J MATCHUNE STA ieawoorw..• a v _----- 0 D r � X z Z z� r co D r= � s "'A Washington State Department of Transportation Organization and Address Supplemental Agreement No. 6 Perteet, Inc. 2707 Colby Avenue, Suite 900 Everett, WA 98201 Agreement Number CAG 0 1 -071 Project Number Phone 425-252-7700 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) $ 970,657 Description of Work Finalize Phase 2 construction documents for the I-405 vicinity. The Local Agency of City of Renton desires to supplement the agreement entered into with Perteet, Inc. and executed on 6/5/2001 and identified as Agreement No. CAG 01-071 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: The original scope of services is amended to include additional services as described in detail in the attached Exhibit "B". Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: 160 days from contract execution Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: Additional services described in Exhibit "B" will cause an increase to the contract of $99 980 as shown in the attached exhibit "D-1" for a new Maximum Amount Payable of $970,657. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. Dated this day of 2005. By: Crystal L. Donner, Executive Vice President By: PERTEET, INC. Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 10/97 Exhibit "B" — Supplemental Agreement No. 6 Scope of Services City of Renton Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) 140 Way SE Intersection Improvements Vicinity of I-405 Northbound Freeway Ramps Phase 2 — I-405 Vicinity INTRODUCTION This work supplements the scope of services to finalize Phase 2 construction documents for the I-405 vicinity. Phase 2 improvements will be constructed around the City's park maintenance property adjacent to Cedar River Park to avoid impacts to the maintenance facility. The eastbound auxiliary lane on SR 169 will be merged into the adjacent through lane to avoid the existing maintenance building. Temporary retaining wall and sidewalk will be constructed along the park maintenance property frontage. No additional improvements along the new park access road or in the vicinity of the parking lot constructed in Phase 1 will be included in Phase 2 construction. The remaining improvements, including the concrete barrier on Wall 1 along the access road, the remaining portion of the parking lot on the park maintenance site, and the remaining portion of Wall 1 and widening along SR 169 on the park maintenance site will be constructed as part of Phase 3 as a separate bid document. Similarly, improvements at 140t" Way SE will not be included in Phase 2 construction, but will be constructed under a separate bid document. The scope of services of the basic agreement is amended to add the following scope of services items. All provisions of the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement: TIME FOR COMPLETION All work under this supplement agreement shall be completed within 160 calendar days of notice to proceed. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. Project Management and Coordination 1. Prepare, monitor and update project schedule. Monitor project budget. 2. Prepare monthly billings and progress reports. 3. Attend up to six meetings with City staff for project coordination and plan review, and prepare meeting minutes. 4. Assist the City in coordination with WSDOT. Attend up to two meetings with WSDOT for review of channelization plans. 5. Quality Assurance. B. Utility Coordination 1. Attend one utility coordination meeting to discuss utility relocations and resolve any conflicts. 2. Obtain updated utility information from utilities and incorporate any new information in the plans. DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 10/97 C. Surveying and Basemapping No additional topographic survey is included, but if required can be provided under a supplement to this agreement. D. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis 1. No additional geotechnical investigation is included, but if required will be provided under a supplement to this agreement. E. Environmental Documentation l . It is assumed that all environmental documentation for Phase 2 construction is complete, however, discussion with WSDOT Local Programs and National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS) will be initiated to determine if detention flow control can be exempted from project. {Explanation: The 2004 WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual and 2005 WDOE Manual have identified the Cedar River as being a receiving water exempt from detention, given the very large size of it's watershed. However, the letter from the NMFS (dated 4-6-05) has identified detention as being applied to this project. A discussion is in order to clarify if it is advisable to utilize the exemption for this project.} A clarification letter requesting exemption for detention will be prepared. 2. Additional environmental documentation, if required, can be provided under a supplement to this agreement. F. Channelization Plan for Approval A modified channelization plan to accommodate construction around the park maintenance facility will be prepared for review and approval by WSDOT. This plan will incorporate a lane reduction to merge the eastbound auxiliary lane on SR 169 into the adjacent through lane west of the park maintenance building. It is assumed that design deviations will not be necessary, but if required, can be provided under a supplement to this agreement. Channelization plan submittals will consist of one draft and one final submittal. WSDOT review comments provided for the draft submittal will be incorporated into the final submittal. G. Drainage The design of the detention and water quality facilities will be done in accordance with the 2004 WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual (HRM), and the City of Renton drainage standards. It is assumed that stormwater detention and water quality facilities are to be underground vaults due to land use constraints. It is important to get concurrence with the basic design elements before proceeding with final design. Therefore, Tasks 1 and 2 are to be conducted and concept plans submitted to the City for review and concurrence prior to commencing the remaining drainage tasks. 1. Prepare up to two conceptual storm plan layouts for detention and stormwater quality treatment, showing the approximate sizes of the facilities. Concept layouts are to be prepared for each of the two drainage basins. Present to the city for concurrence and input. 2. For the purposes of this scope, it is assumed that detention will be provided. However, as noted under environmental documentation, exemption for detention will be pursued with WSDOT and NMFS. If an exemption is approved, detention will not be included. 3. Prepare drainage calculations for sizing detention facilities for the two drainage basins within the project. The calculations will be done using continuous simulation modeling using WWHM software, and using "forested cover" for pre -developed conditions. 4. Prepare drainage calculations for sizing stormwater quality facilities for the two drainage basins within the project. 5. Prepare conveyance calculations for the proposed storm pipe system. DOT Form 1 40-063 EF Revised 10197 6. Prepare drainage plans and details for detention and stormwater quality treatment facilities, and conveyance. It is anticipated that a vault will be used for stormwater treatment. The stormwater vault design will include civil drawings that show inside dimensions, pipe connection locations, access and baffle locations, grades and elevations. This scope of services does not include structural plans and details for the vault. Based on performance specifications developed by the Consultant, the pre -cast concrete supplier will prepare structural drawings for the concrete vault, stamped by a licensed engineer, which is to be submitted by the Contractor at time of construction. 7. Prepare a draft and final Technical Information Report (TIR), using the format identified in the 1998 King County drainage standards. The TIR will be limited to the task items in this scope, and will include drainage calculations, narrative description of the project, drainage basin maps, pipe conveyance calculations, and erosion control calculations. Submit the draft drainage report to the City for review and input prior to preparing the final report. 8. Prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for construction. This is required to meet state requirements when more than 1 acre is disturbed. Prepare and submit a notice of intent (NOI) application to the WDOE. H. Retaining Walls 1. A temporary gravity block wall will be constructed along the park maintenance property frontage on SR 169. The wall will match into the temporary wall constructed under Phase 1 at the east end and the permanent Wall 1 at the west end near the west park maintenance property line. I. PS&E 1. Prepare 90% plans, specifications, and opinion of cost for Phase 2 construction documents. Plans will be revised to incorporate the auxiliary lane reduction modifications from the channelization plan prepared for WSDOT approval and remove Phase 1 and Phase 3 improvements. A temporary sidewalk and wall configuration will be designed along the park maintenance property frontage. The design will incorporate guardrail and fence for crash and fall protection respectively. Drainage plans and details will be prepared for detention and stormwater quality treatment facilities, and conveyance. The stormwater vault design will include civil drawings that show inside dimensions, pipe connection locations, access and baffle locations, grades and elevations. This scope of services does not include structural plans and details for the vault. Based on performance specifications developed by the Consultant, the pre -cast concrete vault supplier will prepare structural drawings for the concrete vault, stamped by a licensed engineer, which is to be submitted by the Contractor at time of construction. Plan utility callouts will also be revised to reflect current design for relocation of facilities. The following table shows the list of plan sheets with the anticipated level of revision. Design revisions pertain to the above described changes. Format revisions pertain to updating title blocks, logos, dates, sheet numbering etc. Sheet Title Number of Sheets Design Revisions Format Revisions Cover Sheet 1 X Summary of Quantities 4 X X Alignment Plan 1 X Construction Sequencing 2 X X TESC Plan & Details 4 X X Typical Roadway Sections 2 X X Plan and Profile 6 X X Roadway Details 1 X DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 10/97 Drainage Details 2 X X Wall Plan and Details 10 X X Form Liner Details 2 X X Channelization Plan 4 X X Signal Plans and Details 9 X X Signing and Illumination Plans 3 X X Driveway Profiles 1 X X Sign Structure Plans and Details 9 X Landscape Plans and Details 4 X X Irrigation Plans and Details 5 X X Total 70 Traffic control plans are not included, but if required, can be provided under a supplement to this agreement. Special provisions will be replaced with the City's current GSP's and updated to reflect federal funding requirements. Amendments to the Standard Specifications previously prepared will be replaced with the current version. The opinion of cost will be updated to reflect changes to bid items, quantities and current prices. 2. Incorporate City review comments from the 90% submittal. Submit final plans, specifications, and opinion of cost for the construction contract. Minor adjustments to the final plan set will be made if required prior to printing of the contract document package and advertisement for bids. J. Right-of-way Documentation 1. It is assumed that no additional right-of-way documentation is necessary, but if required, can be performed under a supplement to this agreement. K. Bidding Assistance 1. Assist City in answering contractor questions as requested during bidding. ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CITY 1. Setup of utility coordination meeting. Distribution of plans to utilities. 2. Front-end specifications not including: Special Provisions, Amendments to the Standard Specifications, and the bid proposal. 3. Printing of final contract package. 4. Two copies of final contract package for Perteet. PROJECT DELIVERABLES The Consultant shall provide the following deliverables with this project: • Three (3) copies of the Drainage TIR at draft and final submittals. • One (1) copy of the opinion of cost at 90% and final submittals. • Five (5) sets of all sheets (at half-size, 11-inch x 17-inch) comprising the set of contract documents for City review at the 90 percent completion stage. DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 10/97 • Two (2) copies of the Special Provisions, Amendments to the Standard Specifications, and Bid Proposal for City review at the 90 percent design submittal. • One (1) set of full-size final plans on translucent bond paper. • One (1) set of half-size final plans on bond paper. • One set of final Special Provisions, Amendments to the Standard Specifications, and Bid Proposal. • One (1) copy of Notice of Intent completed application. • One (1) copy of S WPPP. DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 10/97 Project: Maple Valley Highway Supplement #6 Client: City of Renton HOUR ESTIMATE Classification Hours Rate Cost Associate 8 x $47.12 = $377 Senior Project Manager 150 x $44.79 = $6,719 Lead Drainage Engineer 118 x $42.31 = $4,993 Environmental Planner 6 x $42.31 = $254 Design Engineer III -Site 168 x $30.51 = $5,126 Design Engineer III 150 x $27.27 = $4,091 CADD Operator/ Drafter 173 x $27.50 = $4,758 Clerical 22 x $20.00 = $440 TOTAL HOURLY COST = $26,758 OVERHEAD (OH COST - including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC 168.80% x $26,758 = $45,168 FIXED FEE (FF): FF Rate X DSC 35% x $26,758 = $9,365 REIMBURSABLES: Watershed (Detention Clarification Letter) $800 Mileage @ current federal rate $175 CADD Station @ $10/hr $1,730 Misc. $130 TOTAL REIMBURSABLE COST = $2,835 SUB -CONSULTANTS: CivilTech $12,904 Hough Beck & Baird $2,950 GRAND TOTAL: TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS COST = $15,854 $99,980 DPofar�o@,yF: Carl Einfeld Revised 10/97 Date: July 27, 2005 PROJECT SCHEDULE Maple Valley Highway- Phase 2 TASK COMPLETION DATE Draft Channelization Plan Submittal August 19, 2005 Draft Drainage TIR Submittal August 26, 2005 City Review of Draft TIR September 9, 2005 WSDOT Review of Draft Chann. Plan September 16, 2005 Final Channelization Plan Submittal September 30, 2005 Final Drainage TIR Submittal September 30, 2005 90% PS&E Submittal October 28, 2005 City Review of 90% PS&E November 18, 2005 Final PS&E Submittal January 13, 2005 Ad Date January 31, 2005 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2nnFi - 2n11 SIX-YFAR TIP SR 169 HOV - 140th Way SE to SR-900 Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12175 RANK: 45 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: Construct queue jumps and bypass lanes that provide transit priority traffic signal improvements on SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) at 140th Way SE and in the area 1-405. Involves roadway widening at intersection approaches and modifications to channelization and traffic signals. Also includes widening to improve the north -bound on ramp and south -bound off ramp movement at the 1-405/SR 169 interchange. Improve access to Cedar River Park and Stoneway site through traffic modifications. JUSTIFICATION: This is a high volume, high congestion corridor where providing travel time benefits for transit and car/van pools can be achieved with high cost effectiveness. Also there are severe congestion and safety problems that can be addressed by adding a right turn lane west -bound on SR-169 and a protected right turn lane from the 1-405 northbound off ramp on to east -bound SR-169. STATUS: WSDOT committed $300,000 to design and $450,000 to construction. King County committed approximately $275,000 to this project by constructing a holding pond at 140th Way SE for our use. Design is complete for total buildout. Received TEA-21 Countywide grant of $392,947 for construction. Council allocated $1.2 million from the King County Metro mitigation fund (`included in proposed fund balance). CHANGES: All phases for this project are now funded. Awarded $2,208,000 from the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) for Phase 2 right-of-way and construction. Received $765,993 TEA-21 Countywide funds for Phase 2 construction. State legislature funded $2.5M in gas tax revenue for 2007-2009 biennium. Funded : 18,350,791 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 E PENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 1,046,291 896,231 50,060 100,000 100,000 R-O-W includes Admin 500,005 500,000 500,000 Construction Contract Fee 6,024,500 1,273 935,027 5,088,200 1,038,200 1,800,000 2,250,000 Construction En /Admin 780,000 87 132,713 647,200 117,200 280,000 250,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES SOURCE OF FUNDS: 8,350,791 897,591 1,117,800 6,335,400 1,755,400 2,080,000 2,500,000 Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 197,251 197,251 197,251 Proposed Fund Balance ` 1,200,000 178,991 724,853 296 156 296,156 Grants In -Hand TIB/TEA-21 3,366,940 392,947 21973,993 11655,400 11318,593 Miti ation In -Hand 786,600 418,600 368,000 100,000 268,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other WSDOT & State Le 2,800,000 300,000 2,500,000 21500,000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCESI 8,350,7911 897,591, 1,117,8001 6,335,400 1,755,4001 2,080,0001 2,500,0001 SR18Q_H0V 081MIM5 209 PM 5 - 45 FINAL CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL \ 1 # . e! Submitting Data: Planning/BuildinC,/Public Wurks For Agenda of: September 12, 2005 Dept/Div/Board.. utility Systems/"Technical Services Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Karen McFarland (cxt.7209) Consent .............. X Public Ilearing.. Subject: Tonelli Dedication (50 square feet near the northeast Correspondence.. intersection of Logan Ave N and the Cedar River Ordinance ............. Water" ay) Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhihits: Issue paper Study Sessions...... Exhibit A Information......... Exhibit 13 April 16, 1976, letter from Gerard M. Shcllan August 26, 1975 Quitclaim Deed Recommended Action: Approvals: • Accept (2) Quitclaim Deeds Legal Dept......... • Refer subject of a memorial to Community Services Finance Dept...... Committee Other ............... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... 'Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated ......... Total Project Budget City Share 'Total Project.. SUNINIAKY OF ACTION: Mr. Richard Tonelli has contacted the City of Renton to resolve a matter about property that he believes was deeded to the City of' Renton, in August of 1975, for purposes of a memorial to Police Chief Ang Busato. S'I'AFF I*XOMMENDATION: Accept the 1975 quitclaim deed, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a quitclaim deed prepared by the City Attorney for Richard Tonelli's signature and refer the subject of a memorial for Police Chief Ang Busato and any financing of such a memorial to the Community Services Committee. (' \llorunwill, and scltin<_sl�nncunttmnU.ur�1 Srttui�>>A'rrntpla, hilrUlU�h docAK.%1[p �ti`sY O� PLANNINGBUILDING/ �- , PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 6, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: �Vd Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmemlln-,&dministrator STAFF CONTACT: Karen McFarland, Engineering Specialist (ext. 7209) SUBJECT: Tonelli Dedication (50 square feet near the northeast intersection of Logan Ave N and the Cedar River Waterway) ISSUE: Mr. Richard Tonelli has contacted the City of Renton to resolve a matter about property that he believes was deeded to the City of Renton, in August of 1975, for purposes of a memorial to Police Chief Ang Busato. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the 1975 quitclaim deed, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a quitclaim deed prepared by the City Attorney for Richard Tonelli's signature and refer the subject of a memorial for Police Chief Ang Busato and any financing of such a memorial to the Community Services Committee. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Mr. Richard Tonelli contacted the City of Renton in May 2005 to inquire about property that he believed that August and Theresa Tonelli had deeded to the City of Renton in August of 1975 for purposes of a memorial to Police Chief Ang Busato. A quitclaim deed and some correspondence in the City Clerk's files indicated that while a quitclaim deed had been signed by August and Theresa Tonelli, the City Council did not take any action to accept this property. Furthermore, the City's final correspondence on the subject from Gerard Shellan, the City Attorney at the time, indicated that there were items left to be resolved. Council/Tonelli September 6, 2005 Page 2 of 2 In his April 16, 1976, letter to Mayor Charles Delaurenti, Mr. Shellan states that "some understanding apparently had been worked out between [the Tonellis] and [Mayor Avery Garrett] concerning a memorial." The nature of this understanding is unclear and staff has been unable to determine what agreement, if any, was made from the available records. In the same April 16, 1976, letter to Mayor Charles Delaurenti, Mr. Shellan requests that his office be contacted "when the City is ready to accept the title and nature of the memorial", so that an appropriate resolution can be prepared. Staff searched the official records from August 1975 to the present for Council resolutions on this matter. Staff found no resolutions on this matter. Staff also reviewed the meeting minutes of the City Council for discussion of this matter from the period of August 1975 to May 1977. Staff could find no record that the City ever accepted title to this property or that Council ever discussed or acted to establish a memorial Police Chief Ang Busato. CONCLUSION: Mr. Richard Tonelli has contacted the City to have this matter resolved. Administration recommends Council accept the 1975 quitclaim deed and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a quitclaim deed prepared by the City Attorney for Richard Tonelli's signature. It is also the recommendation of the Administration that Council refer the subject of a memorial for Police Chief Ang Busato and any financing of such a memorial to the Community Services Committee. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Dave Christensen, Wastewater and Technical Services Supervisor H:\File Svs\PRM - Property Services Administration\Current Projects\Tonelli\issuepaper07O5.doc\KLMtp y N _1S 113NW18 ssesz �" o ),1 y s o� of sz Mos-er-os rz ocr 13 0 '•ff/ I I i N / TO , y 9 ,9ye .. \� poi p4 p 9b / Qo h ti 6ira..9 jY � \ a \o~n•' 6'a, \ / z ceLs s s s yPP � 1�(��,,� LLJ —{ m _ n ` ", LEI U o aJ � Nbo° .......... 0 01 LLJ -IL o / � � 4,, p,• Q � I 'a `N A a I Exhibit B Tonelli Property R a Renton MemorialN. 7� m Renton Senior x �; kctivity Center" _v Renton Municipal AirportuIF r u ! Y� 44 r Abe y S Airport ,Way rII x.. j Proposed Deed Area Technical Services K.aMcFar andlding/Public Works 1 3- nTb July 27, 2005 trwd � a OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 026. 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 9e063 255 ee7B GERARD M. SHELLAN, CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE I WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY April 16, 1976 Mayor Charles Delaurenti Renton City hall Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Deed of Gift - Tonelli to City of Renton Dear Charlie: Enclosed you will find copy of a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Tonelli's attorney and the original together with a copy of the Dedication Deed. You will note that some understanding apparently had been .worked out between Mrs. Tonelli and the former Mayor concerning a memorial on subject property. If this is to be financed by the City then some appropriation should be made. We are also sending a co�eriiify y of this letter and a copy of the Deed to Mr. Gonnason to the legal description and the ownership of the Tonellis.l When the City is ready t of the memorial, please resolution can be prepar We remain GMS:bjm Enc. cept the. title and the nature e us know so that an appropriate d/ e M- M [ransamerlc6 Title Insurance on IFT S -ire nJ a nsa ruerrra Cor/•oralio•, Filed for Record at Request of Name ..-._....... 1i11L11am-..L-__..aQna is Address....... _803 E. Main St. ..... ..._................- ... City and State ------ - Auburn, Washington 98002 :HJS SPACE RESERVED FOR RECORDERS USE ------------------------------------------- Quit Claim Deed 4681 Rev THE GRANTORS AUGUST TONELLI and TERESA TONELLI, his wife for and in consideration of deed of gift conveys and quit claims to CITY OF RENTON the following described real estate. situated in the County of King State of Washington, together with all after acquired title of the grantor(s) therein: All that portion of Govt Lot 1, Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, lying easterly of Logan Street and westerly of the Northern Pacific right-of-way and the 2nd class shorelands adjacent thereto less the right-of-way of Commercial Waterway No. 2. Said property to be for the use of the public and for the erection and maintenance of a monument to the memory of former Renton City Police Chief Ang Busato. hated this o? 6-W day of lel�e—q , 19 Aug-ust' Yonel11 --..._ fieresa Tonelli ----------••-- STATE OF WASHINGTON. 1 ss. County of King On this day personally appeared before me August Tonelli and Teresa Tonelli to me known to be the individuals described in and wh- executed the within and foregoing instrument, and arknowleged that they signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned - GIVEN under my hand and official seal this d` ay of /y�� v 19 75. otorrll in for the State of Washington, residine at CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL FAI #. Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of- Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems Division/ Surface September 12, 2005 Water Utility Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Ron Straka (ext. 7248) Allen Quynn (ext. 7247) Consent .............. X Public Hearing.. Subject: CIP Fund Transfer Correspondence.. SW 7`h Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II — Ordinance ............. Lind Ave SW to Morris Ave S Account Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Utilities Committee Legal Dept......... Finance Dept...... X Other ............... Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required... $0 Transfer/Amendment....... $130,000 Amount Budgeted....... $130,000 Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget... $558,000 City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Surface Water Utility requests Council approval to transfer $130,000 from the SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II — Lind Ave SW to Morris Ave S account (#421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065430) to the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update Project (# 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065287) account in the amount of $50,000, and the N 26th Street and Park Place N Storm Improvement Project (# 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065330) account in the amount of $80,000. Construction on the SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement project has been completed. The approved 2005 project budget for SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II — Lind Ave SW to Morris Ave S is $558,000. Approximately $313,000 has been spent year-to-date to complete construction and $115,000 of the approved project budget is still needed for the final street overlay and project management. The remaining $130,000 is surplus budget, which could be used to provide additional funding for other Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Projects. The additional $50,000 for the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update Project is needed for additional Hydrologic and Hydraulic modeling requested by FEMA. The additional $80,000 for the N 261h Street and Park Place N Storm Improvement Project is needed to fund an estimated increase in project construction costs and increased costs associated with obtaining easements for the Droiect. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve transferring a total of $130,000 from the SW 7`h Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II — Lind Ave SW to Morris Ave S account to the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update ($50,000), and the N 26th Street and Park Place N Storm Improvement Project ($80,000). HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2959 SW 7th St. Drainage Improvement Project\1003 City Correspondence\AgenBill-Fund Transfer.doc\AQtp PLANNING/BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �� lv&% M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 31, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheel Mayor FROM: ' Gregg Zimmerma Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor (ext. 7248) Allen Quynn, Surface Water Utility Engineer (ext. 7247) SUBJECT: CIP Fund Transfer — SW 7�h Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II ISSUE: The construction of the SW 7TH Street Drainage Improvement Project has been completed with the exception of the final overlay of the street, which is to be completed as part of the City street overlay program this summer. The Surface Water Utility (SWU) would like to reserve $115,000 in the project account to cover the estimated overlay costs and staff time to close out the project. SWU requests Council approval to transfer the surplus funds of $130,000 to other Surface Water CIP accounts. RECOMMENDATION: Approve transferring $130,000 from the SW 7`h Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II - Lind Ave SW to Morris Ave S (account # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065430) to the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update Project (account # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065287) in the amount of $50,000, and the N 26`h Street and Park Place N Storm Improvement Project (account # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065330) in the amount of $80,000. BACKGROUND The construction of the SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement Project has been completed. Council approved the Final Pay Estimate of $3,092,793.99 on July 11, 2005. The SWU estimates that $115,000 of construction funds will be needed to cover the final costs to overlay SW 71h Street as part of the 2005 Street Overlay Program and administrative staff costs to closeout the project. The SWU requests Council approval to transfer the remaining funds to other Surface Water CIP accounts. Council/CIP Fund Transfer August 31, 2005 Page 2 of 2 The total 2005 budget for the SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II — Lind Ave SW to Morris Ave S is $558,000. Based on expenditures to date, there remains approximately $245,000 in the project budget. $115,000 will be needed to cover the cost of the final overlay ($104,000) and staff costs to close out the project. The remaining $130,000 is surplus project budget and could be used to provide funding for other Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Projects. The Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update Project is currently undergoing agency review and will ultimately re -map the floodplain of Springbrook Creek. Due to the extensive review comments from FEMA, additional hydrologic and hydraulic modeling is required that was not in the original consultant contract scope of work and budget. To cover this additional work, the SWU would like to transfer $50,000 from the SW 7th Street Storm System Improvement Project account to the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update Project account, increasing its approved 2005 budget from $35,000 to $85,000. The N 261h Street and Park Place N Storm Improvement Project will reduce stormwater discharge at the top of a steep hillside. The project will construct a new flexible stormwater pipe down the hillside and redirect flow from existing storm systems into the new pipe. The project is currently being designed and easements are being obtained. The approved 2005 budget for the project is $200,000. The estimated construction cost for the storm system portion of the work is approximately $150,000. The SWU would like $80,000 transferred to the project account to ensure adequate funding for final engineering design, easement and restoration costs, construction, and unexpected project costs. The fund transfer would increase the N 261h Street and Park Place N Storm Improvement Project approved 2005 budget to $280,000. CONCLUSION The Planning/Building/Publie Works Department recommends that Council approve transferring $130,000 from the SW 7th Street Drainage Improvement Project Phase II — Lind Ave SW to Morris Ave S. (account # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065430) to the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update Project (account # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065287) in the amount of $50,000 and the N 26th Street and Park Place N Storm Improvement Project (account # 421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065330) in the amount of $80,000. cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2959 SW 7th St. Drainage Improvement ProjectU 003 City Correspondence\IssuePaper-Fund Transfer.doc\AQtp TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT September 12, 2005 SW 27th Street Connection Project- Phase 1, Segment 1 (Referred August 15, 2005) The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff t_,D F3 it CF�'ir Gil C9'L Date 9-/�_ a005- recommendation to approve Supplemental Agreement #3 with Perteet, Inc. in the amount of $110,846 for construction management services of the SW 27th Street Connection Phase 1, Segment 1 Project, and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Supplement #3, subject to Council's approval of a forthcoming. Finance Committee recommendation that would authorize the funding. .The Committee also recommends that consideration of a.budget,:adjustment to the Transportation (317) Fund to -allow -funding of the SW 27th Stree,fConnection Phase I, Segment I Project, be referred to the Finance Committee for review and recommendation on 9/19/2005, of the following: 1) the construction contract award and cost of the lowest responsible construction bid, plus a 20%contingency (sealed bids are due 9/7/2005-); 2) the construction management services Supplement<in.the-amount of,$_110,846; and, 3) staff and other soft costs in the amount of $195,154 The Transportation Committee further reconmends tlat if Council approves a budget adjustment for this project, that he Transportation Fund be reimbursed by bonding to be secured in 2006. Marcie Palmer, Chair Don Persson, Vice -Chair Randy Corman, Member cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director Leslie Lahndt. Transportation Design Supervisor Robert Lochmiller, Transportation Design Project Manager Connie Brundage, Transportation Systems Administrative Secretary TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT September 12, 2005 By C' d V COU+NCI Date Prioritization of Sound Transit Phase 2 (ST2) Renton Projects List (Referred August 15, 2005) The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to prioritize the Sound Transit Phase 2 projects in Renton as follows: 1. New HOV/Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line from Bellevue to Renton includes: • Completion Sound Move Project N 8tn HOV direct access @ I-405 • Transit Station and structured parking at N 8tn and Logan • Connection to Longacres Commuter Rail Station and completion of SW 27tn / Strander Boulevard 2. HOV Direct Access at SW 27tn/SR 167 3. HOV Direct Access at Rainier/SR 167/I-405 4. BRT Station at Lind Ave SW 5. BRT Station at NE 44tn Marcie Pale, Chair Don Persson, Vice -Chair andy Corman, Member cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Director Nick Afzali, Transportation Planning & Programming Manager Connie Brundage, Transportation Administrative Secretary H..Trans/Admin/Committee/2005/ST 2 Priority Liscdoc "y„9t DY TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE C y' .O°:JNCI COMMITTEE REPORT ! Date September 12, 2005 Trans -Valley ITS Project Interlocal Agreement (Referred August 8, 2005) The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Trans -Valley ITS Project interlocal agreement for the transfer of ownership and the operation and maintenance of traffic signals and related equipment along the Trans -Valley Corridor. The Committee further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. Marcie l-rr�er, Chair Don Persson, Vice Chair (I- kandy Corman, Member cc: Karl Hamilton Connie Brundage H:Trans/admin/Committ/2005/Supplemental Street Liglting Standard A> �� BY 1 Date 9-1 a- UTILITIES COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT September 12, 2005 Urban Craft Utility Oversizing Reimbursement (August 1, 2005) The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the final costs for oversizing of utilities for sewer and water in the amounts of $56,769 for water and $67,279 for sewer. The Committee further recommends that Council authorize the Administration to reimburse the developer for his costs, not to exceed the final amounts approved herein. R dy Corman, Chair Dan Clawson, Vice Chair .iC Y\.` f Don Persson, Member cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director Dave Christensen, Wastewater Utility Supervisor Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT September 12, 2005 C577 COUNCIL ©ate APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS The Finance Committee approves for payment on September 12, 2005, claim vouchers 240557- 241078 and 2 wire transfers, totaling $4,242,030.86 , and 617 direct deposits, payroll vouchers 59606-59932, and 1 wire transfer, totaling $2,034,386.41 . Don Persson, Chair Toni Nelson, Vice -Chair Denis Law, Member 1 _ 7 Y'/�'\ ��Y O ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC ' ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 30, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: yAathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Alex Pietsch STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson SUBJECT: Akers Farms Annexation Referral Response At the public hearing on August 15, 2005, on the Akers Farms Annexation, Mr. Robert Ableidinger testified that he was opposed to having been included in the annexation. At the public meeting on April 18, 2005, Council expanded the annexation to include Mr. Ableidinger's property since the initial annexation had signatures representing 100% of the initial property owners (only 10% was required at this stage, and 60% at the later 60% Direct Petition stage) and expansion to the east created a more reasonable boundary while allowing the City to bring in more developable area. Although Mr. Ableidinger was not notified of the 10% Public Meeting, he was apparently notified of the public hearing before Council on whether it wished to accept the 60% Direct Petition and, if so, possible future zoning on the subject site. Despite several attempts to contact Mr. Ableidinger staff has not be able to talk directly with him. We did, however, write him and included in our letter, as an attachment, a copy of the Renton Annexation Report as well as a fiscal analysis for his property comparing what he now pays in taxes and for services in King County with what he would pay if he were annexed into the City. On August 30, 2005, Mr. Ableidinger did leave a phone message indicating his continued opposition to annexation. Some of the reasons he gave in his message were he had made improvements to his property while his neighbors had not, the fact that he has a doublewide trailer on his property, and the fact that he has a number of variances from King County for uses the City might not want to continue. A return message was left for him noting that his doublewide trailer and variances would most likely be grandfathered in if they were legally granted to him by King County. In this case, the exclusion of the Ableidinger property probably would not adversely affect the Akers Farms Annexation. This is because it is located on the periphery (eastern edge) of the annexation and the annexation proponents already have a sufficient number h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\akers farms\refeiTa) response.doc Terri Briere, Council President August 30, 2005 Page 2 of 2 of signatures without the Ableidinger property to still meet the requirements for annexation. Staff is concerned, however, that if the Council decides to remove the Ableidinger property, a precedent will be established to allow those representing up to 40% of an annexation area's assessed value who do not support annexation (only 60% of the assessed value needs to be represented on the 60% Direct Petition) to similarly request exclusion, in the future. Unless a petition has sufficient signatures, such deletions could weaken or kill an annexation, or, result in boundaries unacceptable to the Boundary Review Board. They could also result in annexations smaller than the ten -acre minimum Council has established. Conclusion: In this instance, it would be possible to exclude the Ableidinger property without jeopardizing the current annexation request or resulting in irrational boundaries. However, this area has long been in the City's Potential Annexation Area and is assumed to one -day annex to Renton. In addition, the concerns of this property owner appear to be unfounded. The removal of this property from the annexation would set a dangerous precedent that will likely have a detrimental effect on future annexation efforts in this and other areas. For these reasons, the Administration cannot support Mr. Ableidinger's request for removal. Therefore, the Administration requests that the question of the Akers Farms 60% Direct Petition to annex be taken off the table and adopted as presented. A recommended motion is below: Recommended Motion: The Administration recommends that Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the 13.3-acre Akers Farms Annexation, support future zoning consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan land use designation shown for it, and, authorize the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board and begin preparing relevant implementation ordinances. Referral 05043-C cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Bonnie Walton, City Clerk i:\correspondence\mayor\05043-c.doc 15, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 289 Continuing with Sound Transit 2 (ST2), Ms. Earl stated that on July 7th, after many public hearings, the Sound Transit Board adopted six changes to its long- range plan, which was originally adopted in 1996. The changes increase the emphasis on serving the designated urban centers, and stick with commuter rail, light rail, and bus rapid transit transportation technologies. She reviewed the ST2 preliminary project lists for the East and South King County Subareas, and the timeline for setting the ST2 project priorities, determining the financial needs, and bringing the package to a public vote. Ms. Earl concluded by reviewing the project evaluation criteria, such as ridership, costs, reliability, system integration and customer experience, which the Sound Transit Board must consider when making a choice among competing transportation technologies. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler expressed her appreciation to Councilmembers Persson and Palmer for serving on SCATBd and ETP. Councilman Corman noted that the Transportation Committee will review on 9/1/2005 the list of prioritized projects within Renton for inclusion in the ST2 work plan. In response to Councilman Persson's inquiry regarding annexing areas to the Sound Transit District, Ms. Earl explained that per Sound Transit's policy, jurisdictions must want to be annexed. Community Event: Renton Community Relations Specialist Sonja Mejlaender introduced Bill Hulten, River Days Recap IKEA Renton River Days Board of Directors Chairman, who presented a report on the 2005 City of Renton community festival held during the week of July 19th through July 24th. Mr. Hulten thanked the City of Renton, the sponsors and contributors, the media partners, and the Renton service clubs for their assistance and support. He reviewed the festival events, activities, entertainment, and exhibitions that took place, such as Kids' Day, Art in the Park, Nibble of Renton, Library Book Sale, and the Skate Park Exhibition. In conclusion, Mr. Hulten expressed his appreciation for the many volunteers who contributed over 9,500 hours in planning for and assisting with the festival. PUBLIC HEARING Annexation: Akers Farms, 108th Ave SE & Puget Dr S This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the public hearing to consider the 60% Notice of Intent to annex petition and R-8 zoning for the proposed 13.3-acre Akers Farms Annexation, located south of Puget Dr. S. and east of 108th Ave. SE, if extended. Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Administrator, reported that the site contains five single-family dwellings, and slopes downward from the southwest corner to the northern point at a 3% slope. The northern portion of the site contains an unclassified coal mine hazard area. In regards to the public services, he indicated that the site is within Fire District #40, the sewer service areas of Renton and the Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, the water service area of Soos Creek Water and Sewer District, and the Renton School District. Mr. Pietsch noted that the site is currently zoned R-8 (eight dwelling units per gross acre) in King County. Renton's Comprehensive Plan designation for the site is Residential Single Family, for which R-8 (eight dwelling units per net acre) zoning is proposed. Reviewing relevant City policies and Boundary Review Board criteria, he explained that this smaller than normal annexation is limited to the future development of 84 or fewer single-family lots and has poor connectivity to the City because of the power line corridor to the northeast. However, the annexation proposal is a potential catalyst for the annexation of a August 15, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 290 larger area to the east, and will facilitate upgrading this portion of Benson Hill under City development standards. Continuing, Mr. Pietsch said the fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of $25,990 at full development, and an estimated one-time parks acquisition and development cost of $33,708. He noted that staff suggests Level 2 flow control for new development, and that the cumulative impact of recent annexations will eventually require more police staff. Mr. Pietsch concluded that the proposed annexation serves the best interests and general welfare of the City, particularly if the annexation facilitates higher quality development near Nelsen Middle School. Public comment was invited. Robert Ableidinger, 10908 SE 164th St., Renton, 98055, expressed his opposition to the inclusion of his property in the annexation proposal, which iconsists of approximately 2.5 acres and is located on the eastern edge of the site. He explained that he has been out of town for over three years, and did not have any input into whether he wanted to be a part of the annexation or not. Mr. Ableidinger asked that his property be removed from the annexation area. Additionally, he noted that it is difficult to afford and obtain building permits from the City of Renton. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler countered that Renton is known for its quick, easy, and predictable permit activity. Councilman Corman also noted the City's fast permit issuance process, and stated that he does not want to force Mr. Ableidinger to come into the City if he objects. Mr. Ableidinger noted the potential of developing more units on his property if it remained in King County. Mr. Pietsch stated that there may be a net reduction in Mr. Ableidinger's ability to develop his property if it were in Renton; however, the City's development fees are approximately an eighth of the cost of the fees in King County. In response to Mr. Corman's inquiry, City Attorney Larry Warren confirmed that at this point in the process, property can be withdrawn from a proposed annexation. Councilman Clawson expressed concerns regarding setting a j precedence and creating holes or irregular boundaries if property were to be j removed from an annexation area, in this instance or in any other, unless there were extreme circumstances. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Moved by Clawson, seconded by Law, Council accept the Akers Farms 60% Direct Petition to annex, support future zoning consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Residential Single Family land use designation, and authorize the Administration to submit the Notice of Intent package to the ,,--,Boundary Review Board and prepare the relevant ordinances.* Councilman Corman noted the number of unanswered questions regarding Mr. Ableidinger's property and suggested staff review of the matter. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler pointed out that the Boundary Review Board is likely to add property to the boundaries of annexations, since King County is trying to divest itself of unincorporated areas. i August 15, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 291 City Clerk Bonnie Walton confirmed that at staffs recommendation, Council j agreed to expand the Akers Farms annexation area to include the subject eastern parcel and abutting street right-of-way when the 10% petition was j accepted and the circulation of the 60% petition was authorized on April 18th. Councilman Clawson urged Council to support the annexation as presented. Councilman Corman indicated there may be extenuating circumstances in this particular case. ' *MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL TABLE THE MOTION UNTIL THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING ON 9/12/2005. .CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: The annual Kennydale Splash Day, organized by Recreation Division lifeguards, was held on August I Ith. Eighty swimmers, 16 years and younger, competed in races and contests, in and out of the water. The 39th session of the Renton Police Department Citizen's Academy begins September 13th. The academy meets for 12 weeks on Tuesdays, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., and interested individuals must apply by September 2nd. RECESS MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:52 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:57 p.m.; roll was called; all Councilmembers present. AUDIENCE COMMENT T.C. Davis, 1615 S. Puget Dr., #D, Renton, 98058, referenced unfinished Citizen Comment: Davis - business item 9.c., the Transportation (Aviation) Committee report concerning Airport Hangar Buildings the recommendation to revert the Cedar River Hangar Limited Partnership's Reversion to City Ownership airport hangar buildings to City ownership. Mr. Davis expressed his opposition from Cedar River Hangar to the reversion, saying that the City should not be in the retail business. He Limited Partnership asked that the recommendation to approve this action be reconsidered, and that the City's related financial information be reviewed. (See page 294 for committee report.) Citizen Comment: Gannett - Jim Gannett, 14443 NE 61st St., Redmond, 98052, referring to the same topic Airport Hangar Buildings as the previous speaker, reviewed the proposed 15-year lease submitted by Reversion to City Ownership Cedar River Hangar Limited Partnership in May, and questioned the soundness from Cedar River Hangar of the City's financial information concerning the matter. He indicated that the Limited Partnership reversion will put the partnership out of business, and noted the revenue the City has received from the business over the course of its lease. Mr. Gannett stated his concerns regarding the reversion of private enterprises to public ownership, and expressed his unhappiness with the reversion recommendation and the City's handling of businesses as the Airport. (See page 294 for committee report.) CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of 8/8/2005. Council concur. 8/8/2005 Adopled CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, APPROVING FINAL PLAT (STONERIDGE, A.K.A. WINDSTONE; FILE NO. LUA-05-001FP). WHEREAS, a petition for the approval of a final plat for the subdivision of a certain tract of land as hereinafter more particularly described, located within the City of Renton, has been duly approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, after investigation, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has considered and recommended the approval of the final plat, and the approval is proper and advisable and in the public interest; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools, schoolgrounds, sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the public use and interest will be served by the platting of the subdivision and dedication; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The final plat approved by the Planning/Building/Public Works Department pertaining to the following described real estate, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth 1 RESOLUTION NO. (The property, consisting of approximately 12.7 acres, is located west of Nile Avenue NE and north of SR 900) is hereby approved as such plat, subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton, and subject to the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department dated August 10, 2005. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1130:8/11/05:ma Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2 EXHIBIT A Stone Ridge (AKA Windstone) Legal Descriptions Parcel A: Lot X of King County Boundary line Adjustment No. LOOL0089, recorded under Recording No. 20020702900007, in King County, Washington. Parcel B: The North 165 feet of the South 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT county roads; TOGETHER WITH that portion of Lot 2, King County Short Plat No. 486017, recorded under Recording No. 8703039001, described as follows. - Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence South 87*49'15" East along the North line of said Lot, a distance of 97.38 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 2'10'45" West a distance of 158.13 feet to the South line of said Lot 2 and a point on a curve concave Northwesterly, the radial center of which bears North 19'44'42" West; thence Northeasterly along the South line of said Lot 2 and the arc of said curve having a radius of 95.00 feet, through a central angle of 31'38'59", a distance of 52.48 feet to a point of reverse curvature of a curve concave Southeasterly, the radial center of which bears South 51*23'41" East; thence continuing Northeasterly along said South line of said Lot 2 and the arc of said curve having a radius of 65.00 feet, through a central angle of 53'34'26", a distance of 60.78 feet; thence continuing along the South line of said Lot 2, South 87'49'15" East a distance of 223.23 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot; thence North 1'24'12" East along the East line of said Lot 2 a distance of 100.02 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot; thence North 87'49'15" West along the North line of said Lot a distance of 315.14 feet to the True Point of Beginning. (also known as Lot Y of King County Boundary line Adjustment No. LOOL0089, recorded under Recording No. 20020702900007.) Parcel C: Lot 1, King County Short Plat No. 486017, recorded under Recording No. 8703039001, and amended by affidavit of correction recorded under Recording No. 8706260950, in King County, Washington, being a portion of the South half of the South half of the South half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; TOGETHER WITH the following described property in accordance with decree quieting title in King County Superior Court Cause No. 86-2-22118-2 entered on March 23, 1987: the South 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 840.50 feet thereof; and EXCEPT the North 165 feet thereof; and EXCEPT that portion of lying within the South half of the South half of the South half of said subdivision; and EXCEPT county roads. Parcel D: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, in King County, Washington; thence North 65 feet along the East line of said Section 3: thence West 670.2 feet; thence South 65 feet to the South line of said Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 3; thence East along said South line, 670.2 feet to the Point of Beginning; EXCEPT roads. IS EXHIBIT A Stone Ridge (AKA Windstone) Vicinity Map SE MAV VALLEY RD w Cn SE 100TH ST Q SE 102TH ST 1-- Q w Iz Uj SE 105TH PL > w Q cn J w > a Q 0 UNSET gLV� `� NE S I �r 9�0 SITE n m R�N�ON rSSAQV HH R Q s MAY VALLEY c'a/ I COUNTY PARK X a Centre 33701 9th Avenue South Federal Way, WA. 98003 �� N (253) 661-1901 NOT TO e®�� a Pointe SCALE V Surveying ,qdo 4-d 9-/0?-90105- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 3 710 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE FOR DEPOSITORIES AND ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFERS ON BEHALF OF AND IN THE NAME OF THE CITY OF RENTON. WHEREAS, the City of Renton maintains one or more accounts at one or more qualified public depositories, including the state operated Local Government Investment Pool for primary banking, investing, or third party trust agreement purposes; and WHEREAS, the City's appointed Finance & Information Services Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to open and maintain these accounts as required from time to time on behalf of and in the name of the City of Renton; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The depositories are hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments in the name of the City of Renton and signed by any one of the following officers and officials of the City of Renton: Title Mayor Name Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Finance & Information Services Administrator Michael E. Bailey SECTION II. Any of the above named officers or officials are further authorized to endorse any such checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing same into the City's accounts. 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION III. The designated depository for the account in the name of City of Renton Municipal Court (Municipal Court account) is hereby authorized to honor and pay checks, drafts, and similar instruments signed by the Court Services Director or Municipal Court Judge. The Director or Judge are further authorized to endorse checks, drafts, or other instruments made payable to the City of Renton for the purpose of depositing the same into the Municipal Court account. Title Name Court Services Director Joseph T. McGuire Muncipal Court Judge Terry L. Jurado SECTION IV. The following individuals are authorized to initiate and/or approve electronic fund transfers for the purposes of disbursing and depositing City funds for the purposes of investing, cash management, and accomplishing authorized City business in the City's name: Title Finance & Information Services Administrator Fiscal Services Director Finance Analyst Supervisor Finance Analyst Supervisor Finance Analyst Name Initiate Approve Michael E. Bailey Yes Yes Linda Parks Yes Yes Cindy Zinck Yes Yes Bang Parkinson Yes Yes Linda Dixon Yes No SECTION V. There shall be no obligation on the part of the depositories to see the application of funds in any case whatsoever, and that a true copy of this resolution be certified and delivered to each said depository at the time any such account is opened on behalf of the City of Renton. 2 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION VI. Effective September 15, 2005, Section I and Section IV of Resolution No. 3737, which was passed and approved on February 7, 2005, is hereby repealed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.1133:9/8/05:ma Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. 2005. 3 14oPled 9 o?-;W6- CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 577/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AND THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND RELATED EQUIPMENT ALONG THE TRANS -VALLEY CORRIDOR WHEREAS, King County has a Capital Improvement Project to interconnect the traffic signal system along the Trans -Valley Corridor from SE 151't Street on Petrovitsky Road to S. 18e Street at Southcenter Parkway; and WHEREAS, portions of the corridor are located in Renton, Tukwila and unincorporated King County; and WHEREAS, Renton and Tukwila own certain traffic signals along the corridor; and WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Project involves installing closed-circuit television cameras, Intelligent Transportation Systems, and Transit Priority Request equipment; and replacing City signal equipment; and WHEREAS, the parties would find it mutually beneficial for the cities to maintain their respective equipment located within their jurisdiction, and for the county to operate the city signals, at county expense for two years, in coordination with related county, city and state equipment; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the terms and conditions under which this agreement will be undertaken; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects. SECTION H. The Mayor and City Clerk are authorized are hereby authorized to enter into an interlocal agreement for the transfer of ownership and the operation and maintenance of traffic signals and related equipment along the Trans -Valley Corridor. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this APPROVED BY TBE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1122:7/20/05:ma day of 72005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2