HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 10/17/2005AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
October 17, 2005
Monday, 7:00 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PROCLAMATION: Make a Difference Day - October 22, 2005
4. PUBLIC MEETING:
State Initiative 912 concerning motor vehicle fuel taxes and transportation infrastructure, which will
be on the November ballot
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Park Terrace annexation and zoning for 80 acres located between SE 112th and 122nd Streets, if
extended, and east of Anacortes Ave. NE to 142nd and 144th Avenues SE (continued from
10/3/2005 )
b. Vacation petition for portion of unopened Aberdeen Ave. NE, south of NE 40th St. at Monterey
Pl. NE (Petitioner: Ron G. Dohm)
6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
7. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of 10/10/2005. Council concur.
b. City Clerk reports receipt of $13,100 compensation paid by petitioner, as set by Council on
7/11/2005, and recommends adoption of an ordinance to finalize the Robin Bales vacation of
portion of Lyon Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St. (VAC-04-002). Council concur. (See 1 l.d. for
ordinance.)
c. City Clerk reports receipt of $21,285 compensation paid by petitioner, as set by Council on
7/11/2005, and recommends adoption of an ordinance to finalize the Pool Brothers Construction,
LLC vacation of portion of N. 14th St., east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park (VAC-05-001). Council concur. (See ILe. for ordinance.)
d. City Clerk submits Quarterly Contract List for period of 7/1/2005 to 9/30/2005; 56 contracts and
16 addenda totaling $8,700,156.66. Information.
e. Community Services Department recommends approval of an agreement with MIG, Inc. in the
amount of $50,000 to update the Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan.
Council concur.
f. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 60% Notice
of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Querin II Annexation and recommends a public
hearing be set on 11/7/2005 to consider the petition and R-8 zoning; 7.18 acres located between
Hoquiam Ave. NE on the west and 144th Ave. SE, if extended, on the east, south of SE 112th St.
Council concur.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
g. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends
approval, with conditions, of Boeing's Subdistrict 113 Conceptual Redevelopment Plan for a
second phase of redevelopment of surplus property located south of N. 8th St. and east of Logan
Ave. N. Refer to Committee of the Whole; set public hearing on 11/7/2005.
h. Legal Division requests the emergency adoption of an ordinance clarifying penalty provisions in
Title IV, Title V, and Title IX of City Code. Council concur. (See 11. for ordinance.)
i. Transportation Systems Division requests approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 3 to CAG-
03-151, agreement with Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. for design services in the amount of
$85,409 for the King County portion of the Duvall Ave. NE Widening Project. (King County
will reimburse the City for the additional costs.) Council concur.
j. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan entitled
"Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9
Salmon Habitat Plan, Making our Watershed Fit for a King." Council concur. (See 11. for
resolution.)
9. CORRESPONDENCE
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Committee of the Whole: 2006 Legislative Priorities
b. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Sprint Master Use Agreement*
11. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Resolution: WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan ratification (see 8.j.)
Ordinances for first reading:
a. Approving the Park Terrace Annexation (see 5.a.)
b. Establishing R-8 zoning for 63 acres of the Park Terrace Annexation (see 5.a.)
c. Establishing R-10 zoning for 3.4 acres of the Park Terrace Annexation (see 5.a.)
d. Vacation of portion of Lyons Ave. NE; petitioner Robin Bales (see 8.b)
e. Vacation of portion of N. 14th St.; petitioner Pool Brothers Construction (see 8.c.)
Ordinance for first reading; and advancement to second and final reading:
Clarifying penalty provisions for violations of City Code (see 8.h.)
Ordinance for second and final reading: Sprint Master Use Agreement (1st reading 10/10/2005)
12. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
13. AUDIENCE COMMENT
14. ADJOURNMENT
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Council Conference Room
5:00 p.m.
2006 Legislative Priorities;
Third Quarter Financial Report
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
October Ill, 2005
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:00 p.m.
M I N U T E S Renton City Hall
CALL, TO ORDER
Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF
RANDY CORMAN, Council President Pro Tem; DENIS LAW; DAN
COUNCILMEMBERS
CLAWSON; TONI NELSON; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL EXCUSE
ABSENT COUNCIL PRESIDENT TERRI BRIERE. CARRIED.
CITY STAFF IN
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief
ATTENDANCE,
Administrative Officer; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney;
BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; SANDRA MEYER,
Transportation Systems Director; NICK AFZALI, Planning and Programming
Supervisor; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON
ERICKSON, Senior Planner; LINDA HERZOG, Interim Assistant to the CAO;
MIKE WEBBY, Human Resources Administrator; COMMANDER KEVIN
MILOSEVICH, Police Department.
PROCLAMATION A proclamation by Mayor Keolker-Wheeler was read declaring the month of
Arts and Humanities Month - October 2005, to be "Arts and Humanities Month" in the City of Renton and
October 2005 encouraging all citizens to join in the special observance as arts and humanities
enhance and enrich the lives of all Americans. MOVED BY CORMAN,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION
AS READ. CARRIED.
Barbara Nielsen, President of the Allied Arts Council, accepted the
proclamation. She announced that an Allied Arts of Renton Family Concert,
featuring the Seattle Philharmonic Orchestra, will be held at the IKEA
Performing Arts Center on October 30th. Pointing out that Renton offers many
venues for the arts, such as three live theaters and the annual art festival, Ms.
Nielsen expressed her appreciation for Renton's support of the arts.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION Tom Carlson, BuRSST for Prosperity Executive Director, explained that
Human Services: BuRSST for BuRSST is a new long-term initiative to strengthen communities and generate
Prosperity, Northwest Area prosperity for all residents of Burien, Renton, SeaTac, Tukwila, and the
Foundation community of Skyway. Ile noted that the Northwest Area Foundation
identified the following trend in this Central South King County area: the shift
in urban poverty from urban, inner-city neighborhoods to the "first ring"
communities at the larger city's edge.
Mr. Carlson reported that a community -developed and driven strategic plan was
developed to tackle poverty. The plan consists of four strategies: improve
family stability, enhance economic opportunity, invest in children and youth,
and build strong communities. He indicated that a team of community
advocates representing the diverse geographic and ethnic communities within
BuRSST is being deployed to build connections within and among the
communities. Additionally, a multi -cultural training institute is being launched
to help develop and train new community leaders.
October 10, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 345
PUBLIC MEETING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Annexation: Leitch, SE 136th accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
St & 140th Ave SE public meeting to consider the 10% Notice of Intent to annex petition for the
proposed Leitch Annexation; 14.6 acres bounded generally by 140th Ave. SE,
if extended, on the west, 143rd Ave. SE, if extended, on the east, SE 136th St.,
if extended, on the north, and SE 138th St., if extended on the south.
Senior Planner Don Erickson reported that eight single-family dwellings exist
on this site, which is virtually flat except for the southeast corner where
Maplewood Creek is present. Reviewing the public services, he noted the site
is served by Fire District #25, Water District #90, Renton sewer, and the
Renton School District. Existing King County zoning is R-4 (four dwelling
units per gross acre), and Renton's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as
Residential Low Density for which R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre)
zoning is proposed.
Continuing, Mr. Erickson pointed out that improvements on SE 136th St., 140th
Ave. SE, and 143rd Ave. SE are needed to meet City standards, and will mostly
likely be paid for by developers. He also pointed out the potential drainage
problems, noting that King County's 2005 Surface Water Manual, Level 2
standards are recommended for new development. Mr. Erickson stated that the
fiscal impact analysis indicates a surplus of $450 at current development and a
surplus of $13,773 at full development, assuming an increase to 46 single-
family homes. Additionally, he noted the estimated one-time parks acquisition
and development cost of $20,984.
In conclusion, Mr. Erickson reported that the annexation proposal is generally
consistent with Renton policies and Boundary Review Board criteria. The
annexation serves the best interests and general welfare of the City, particularly
if it facilitates annexation of the unincorporated area to the west and south.
Public comment was invited. There being none, it was MOVED BY NELSON,
SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC MEETING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ACCEPT THE
LEITCH 10% ANNEXATION PETITION, AND AUTHORIZE
CIRCULATION OF THE 60% DIRECT PETITION TO ANNEX REQUIRING
THAT SIGNERS SUPPORT ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SUPPORT PROPERTY OWNERS
ASSUMING A PROPORTIONAL SHARE OF THE CITY'S BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS. CARRIED.
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted
included:
Take part in the "Cedar River Salmon Journey" this fall, and see spawning
salmon. Volunteer naturalists will be stationed from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00
p.m. at the Renton Library (100 Mill Ave. S.), Cavanaugh Pond (east of
Renton on the Cedar River, on Maple Valley Hwy.), and Landsburg Park
(276th Ave. SE in Kent) on October 15th, 22nd, 23rd, and 29th.
October 10, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes
346
ks The public is invited to attend Are You Ready?, a free Puget Sound region
emergency preparedness event at the Seattle Exhibition 1{all on October
21st and 22nd. Product suppliers and experts in preparedness will display
and sell emergency and safety products, services and technologies.
Tiles commemorating veterans will be engraved during the week of
October l7th to 21st, weather permitting, at Veterans Memorial Park.
Applications are now being accepted for the Spring 2006 engraving, which
will be completed in time for Memorial Day 2006. The cost is $50 per
name.
Council: Initiative 912 (Motor
Noting the importance of being informed about State Initiative 912 (motor
Vehicle Fuel Taxes Repeal)
vehicle fuel taxes repeal), it was MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY
PALMER, COUNCIL. HOLD A PUBLIC MEETING ON INITIATIVE 912 ON
10/ 17/2005. CARRIED.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Tom Carpenter, 15006 SE 139th PI., Renton, 98059, indicated that he has lived
Citizen Comment: Carpenter -
in the unincorporated East Renton Plateau area for 25 years and is a member of
Annexation Policy, Perception
the Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council and a citizens advisory board
by Public
that is advising on annexation open house and discussion events. Mr. Carpenter
expressed concerns that Renton's annexation policy is not perceived as positive
by the public, which is shown for example, by the lack of the City's name on a
flier advertising an upcoming annexation open house. Ile explained that in the
absence of a positive message, residents may feel that local governments are
abandoning them, thus perpetuating the feeling that they have no control over
their own destiny.
MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ALLOW THE
SPEAKER FIVE ADDITIONAL MINUTES FOR 11IS COMMENTS.
CARRIED.
Mr. Carpenter stated that he is active in the development of the comprehensive
plan for the East Plateau, and although he supports the objectives of the Growth
Management Act (GMA), he is a critic of its implementation. Noting that
residents in the growth areas have little say in the changes that affect their
neighborhoods, Mr. Carpenter emphasized that Renton has an opportunity to
deliver a positive message during this contentious GMA implementation
process.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated that Renton is participating in the annexation
workshops, and pointed out that Renton supports annexations when they are in
the best interest of the City. Councilman Clawson noted the importance of
evaluating each annexation individually, and expressed his hope that Renton is
not inadvertently communicating a less than welcoming message to East
Plateau residents.
Citizen Comment: Bosair Douglas N. Owens, PO Box 25416, Seattle, 98165, stated that he represents Mr.
Lease at Airport, AcuWings and Mrs. Acuner and their company AcuWings, LLC, who are applying for an
Operating Permit and operating permit for a flight school and aviation supply and rental business at
Agreement Renton Airport in property leased by Bosair, LLC. He pointed out that the
Transportation (Aviation) Committee is recommending approval of the
AcuWings operating permit, and the change to the Bosair lease to permit the
activities. Mr. Owens urged Council to approve the Committee's
recommendation. (See page 348 for Committee report.)
Octuber 10, 200.E Renton City Council Minutes Page 347
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of
Approval of Council meeting minutes of 10/3/2005. Council concur.
10/3/2005
Court Case: [;state of James
Court Case filed on behalf of the Estate of James Frederick Brutsche, et al by
Frederick Brutsche, CRT 05-
John R. Muenster, 1111 3rd Ave., Suite 2220, Seattle, 98101, pertaining to a
012
police drug raid on the Brutsche family property located in the City of Kent on
7/ 10/2003. Refer to City Attorney & Insurance Services.
D veloprnc•nt Services:
Development Services Division recommended approval to replace the option
Deferral of Street
for deferral of street improvements for short plats with participation in fee -in -
Improvements
lieu of deferred street improvements. Refer to Transportation (Aviation)
Committee.
Plat: Cherie Lane, S 351h St &
Development Services Division recommended approval, with conditions, of the
Wells Ave S, 111-05-073
Cherie Lane Final Plat; 16 single-family lots on 4.98 acres located at S. 35th St.
and Wells Ave. S. (FP-05-073). Council concur. (See page 349 for resolution.)
Development Services:
Development Services Division recommended acceptance of a deed of
Ridgeview Court & Flmhurst
dedication for additional right-of-way on Bremerton Ave. NE to fulfill
Plats, ROW Dedication,
requirements of both the Ridgeview Court Plat (PP-04-131) and the Elmhurst
Bremerton Ave NE
1--'inal Plat (FP-05-090). Council concur.
Annexation: Mosier 11, 140th
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Ave SE & SE 136th St
recommended a public hearing be set on 10/24/2005 to consider the proposed
Mosier 11 Annexation and future zoning of the site, the boundaries of which
were expanded front 31.24 to 65 acres. The site is located between 140th Ave.
SF and Lyons Ave. NE, north of St, 136th St. Council concur.
Ifuman Resources: Police
Ilurnan Resources and Risk Management Department requested approval of the
Officers Guild Commissioned
Renton Police Officers' Guild Commissioned Unit and Renton Firefighters
& Local 804 Firefighters
Local 864 labor agreements, each for three years (2006 to 2008). Council
Labor Contracts
concur.
WSDOT: Renton hill Access
Transportation Systems Division recommended concurrence with the
Concurrence Letter
Washington State Department of Transportation regarding Renton Hill access.
Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee.
MOVED BY COR'V1AN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
CNFIN1SHED BUSINESS
Councilman Corman reported on the Eastside Transportation Partnership's
Transportation: Bus Rapid
(ETP) recommendation for Sound Transit Phase 2 (ST2), in particular the issue
Transit
of 1-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). He explained that prior to a recent ETP
meeting, BRT was not an element of ST2, and thanks to the work of City staff
and elected officials, ETP was successful in the listing of the BRT stations and
capital improvements on the ST2 plan for evaluation by Sound Transit.
Councilman Corman gave a briefing on BRT, highlighting characteristics of the
bus, including its low floor design, configuration, capacity, and precision
docking capability. He noted BRT's streamlined fare collection system, and the
queue jump lanes and transit signal priority, which allows BRT to bypass
queues of general-purpose vehicles at intersections and to extend the signal
green time or reduce the signal red time at intersections. Mr. C'orman displayed
conceptual drawings of the park and rides and inline stations, and drawings of
the potential alignment of this transit service.
October 10, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 348
Nick Afzah, Planning and Programming Supervisor, reviewed the potential
alignments, noting that they are the result of a June 16, 2005, I-405 South
Corridor B RT pre -design report, conducted as part of the I-405 Corridor
Program. Mr. Corman also pointed out that the 1-405 Corridor Program
Executive Committee reviewed various treatments for the corridor and
determined that BRT was the best rapid transit option.
Utilities Committee
Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report recommending
CAG: 03-108, Maplewood
concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Addendum No. 3 to CAG-
Water Treatment Facility
03-168, agreement with HDR Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $134,211 for
Improvements, HDR
additional engineering services assistance for the construction of the
Engineering
Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements Project. MOVED BY CORMAN,
SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Utility: Springbrook Creek Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report recommending
Floodplain Map & N 26th concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the fund transfer of
St/Park PI N Storm
$130,000 from the SW 7th St. Drainage Improvement Project Phase II, Lind
Improvement Projects Fund
Ave. SW to Morris Ave. S. (account 421.600.18.5960.38.65.65430) to the
Transfer
following Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program project
accounts:
• Funds in the amount of $50,000 to the Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map
Update Project (account 421.600.18.5960.38.65.65287); and
• Funds in the amount of $80,000 to the N. 26th St. and Park Pl. N. Storm
Improvement Project (account 421.600.18.5960.38.65.65330).
The transferred funds will be used for consultant modeling, construction,
easement acquisition, and other project costs. MOVED BY CORMAN,
SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Finance Committee
Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval
Finance: Vouchers
of Claim Vouchers 241479 - 241977 and two wire transfers totaling
$2,748,053.95; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 60209 - 60440, one wire
transfer, and 588 direct deposits totaling $1,894,637.03. MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor
WSDOT: SR-167 Mainline and City Clerk to provide a concurrence signature to the Washington State
Alignment Concurrence Letter Department of Transportation regarding the SR-167 mainline alignment from
the southern Renton City limit to I-405. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED
BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Airport: Bosair Lease, Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
AcuWings Operating Permit recommending approval of a new lease agreement with Bosair, LLC at the
and Agreement Renton Airport (LAG-05-004). The Committee further recommended approval
of an operating permit and agreement with AcuWings, LLC to sublease from
Bosair, LLC for the purposes of flight training services, aircraft rental, and the
sale of pilot supplies to the general public. MOVED BY PALMER,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
October 10, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 349
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated for the record that the Administration
recommended denial of the action for the following reasons: l) The precedent
that is created because the existing Bosair lease did not allow flight schools and
there are other locations at the airport that do allow flight schools. The
Administration did not want to a change an existing lease to allow a use that is
not normally allowed. 2) Concerns from residents regarding the impacts from
flight schools and the planes that circle the area, and CounciI's prior direction to
deal with those issues differently than proposed. 3) The presence of an Airport
Plan, which is another direction from Council, that proposes higher and better
uses for the .Airport.
Councilwoman Palmer explained that AcuWings has shown that they are
concerned about the residents, will be a good tenant, and have participated with
the Airport Advisory Committee. She noted that the flight school has different
plans than the flight schools currently in place. Ms. Palmer stated for the
record that the decision was made with a great deal of thought and
investigation.
RESOLUTIONS AND
The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES
Resolution #1775
A resolution was read approving the Cherie Lane Final Plat; 4.98 acres located
Plat: Cherie Lane, S 35th St &
in the vicinity of S. 35th St. and Wells Ave. S. (FP-05-073). MOVED BY
Wells Ave S, FP-05-073
CLAWSON, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADOPT" 1'l IE
RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED.
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
Council meeting of 10/ 1 7/2005 for second and final reading:
Franchise: Sprint
An ordinance was read granting unto Sprint Communications Company L.P., a
Communications, Fiber Optic
Delaware Limited Partnership, its successors and assigns, the right, privilege,
Communication Facilities
authority and master use agreement to install telecommunication facilities
together with appurtenances thereto, upon, over, under, along, across the
streets, avenues, and alleys of the City of Renton within City right-of-way and
public properties of the City. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY
PALMER, COUNCIL KEFER THE ORD[ ANCF. FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING ON 10/ 17/2005. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL. REFER
Council 2006 Legislative
2006 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE.
Priorities
CARRIED.
EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY C'ORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL RECESS INTO
AND ADJOURNMENT EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 70 MINTJTES TO
DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN
AND THAT THE COLJNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE
EXECUTIVE SESSION 1S ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:06 p.m.
Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive
session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:21 p.m.
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
October 10, 2005
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 10, 2005
COMMITTEE/CHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
(Briere)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE
(Persson)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
(Clawson)
PUBLIC SAFETY
(Law)
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Palmer)
UTILITIES
(Corman)
MON., 10/17 2006 Legislative Priorities;
5:00 p.m. Third Quarter Financial Report
*Council Conference Room*
MON., 10/17 Renton Transit Center Safety Concerns
4:00 p.m.
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council
Conference Room unless otherwise noted.
CITY OVA RENTON
Mayor
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
W hewea-k, serious social problems concern our nation and threaten its future; and
WhZre,C , connecting with others and working together through volunteer service can bridge
the differences that separate people and help solve serious social problems; and
Whewec4; we, the American people, have a tradition of philanthropy and volunteerism; and
Wherea. 4, countless self-sacrificing individuals have touched and enhanced the lives of
millions on the annual Make A Difference Day by giving where there was a need, rebuilding
what had been torn down, teaching where there was a desire to learn, and inspiring those who
had lost hope; and
Wh we.a,k, USA Weekend Magazine and its affiliate newspapers and The Points of Light
Foundation and its affiliate Volunteer Centers have joined to promote an annual national day of
doing good that celebrates and strengthens the spirit of volunteer service; and
Whe,rea4, volunteer service is an investment in the future we all must share;
Now, T7Wrefvre, I, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby
proclaim October 22, 2005, to be
M ake/ A D 6ffi?.1re4Ace1Day
in the City of Renton, Washington, and urge my fellow citizens to observe this day by connecting
with friends, fellow employees, and relatives, and with religious, school, and civic groups to
engage in projects benefiting our community.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be
affixed this 17`" day of October, 2005.
Kathy Ke lker-Wheeler
Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington
REI TON
1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6500 / FAX (425) 430-6523
e1his paper mntains 50 % recyded matenal, 30 % post consumer
-
AHEAD 0F THE CURVF.
`�Y O
�vo
Public Meeting
Initiative 912
Assumptions for Analysis
of Initiative 912
Repeals the phased -in 9.5 cents -a-
gallon increase
- — 3 aants a gallon on July 1, 2005
— 3 nts a gallon on July 1, 2006
— 2 cents a gallon on July 1, 2007
— 1.5 ants a gallon on July 1, 2008
• Initiative does not affect scheduled
increases in the state tax on diesel fuel
2005 State Legislative
Actions
• 16-year plan to address transportation
needs
• Funded mostly by a 9.5-cent phased
gas tax increase
• $4.4 billion, plus $1 billion in proposed
bond proceeds for 265 transportation
projects throughout the State
Assumptions for Analysis
of Initiative 912
Gas tax increase generates $4.434 billion plus
$1.041 billion in net bond proceeds over 16 years
— 80% of the cost of 265 new transportation projects specked
by the Legislature
Eliminates $562 million that cities and counties
would received over 16 years for local
transportation projects.
— Includes $482 million that cities and counties would receive
as direct revenue distributions from gas tax increases
— And, $80 million in grants to local government.
Fiscal Impact Statement
for Initiative 912
• Eliminate $5.475 billion in fuel taxes and
net bond proceeds, over 16 years
• Eliminate 80 percent of funding for 265
new transportation projects specified by
the Legislature.
— About $562 million for new, local -government
transportation projects over 16 years would also be
eliminated
1
1-405: SR 167 to SR 169
• Add one
northbound
I to I-405
from SR 167
to SR 169
• Reduce
congestion
'W
and improve
a
efficiency of
'
SR-167?
interchange
A-405: Interchange at Talbot
• New on ramp ,
to the north r'
and off -ramp 3
's from the north = � ,X k
�• Reduce
congestion,
improve F
efficiency of
167 and $ + r
169 '
interchanges
Reduce traffic r
on local
streets
14
1-405:
NE 441h Street to 1121h Ave SE
One northbound
�lane,
one
southbound lane
Interchange,
z
improvements to
r J
be determined
Reduce'
congestion and
- _
improve
str«t
efficiency at
r
interchange
SR 167: 1-405 to SW 415t St
1-405:
1-5 to West Valley Hwy
Add one lane
�,xr
northbound
N4
and one lane
southbound
i,.,.
• Improve
safety and
reduce
Y,
congestion
x
near the 1-5
and 1-405
•�
interchange
a Local Project Funding from
gas tax
• The City of Renton's estimated new fuel tax
revenue over six years is approximately $1.3
million.
• Allows for partial funding of local project:
— SW 27th Street connection $240,000
— Rainier Avenue $375,000
T
— Hardie Avenue $155,000 7 "
— NE 3rd/NE 4th Street Corridor $540,000
M
r
Major Renton Projects
NE 3rd/4th Street Corridor
Improve traffic NE 3r"!4"' Sample
flow and access Street layout plan
to property f "
• Pedestrian, votc
bicycle, and
streetscape C
improvements -
• Phased ; «—
implementation
Major Renton Projects:
Rainier/Hardie Aves.5=;.
Construct bus
lanes on Hardie •�,
Ave SW P
t Reconstruct
railroad bridge
• Widen and,
complete
sidewalks
Provide landscape
-
medians
Major Regional Projects
SR 99/Alaskan Way Viaduct $2 billion
• SR 520-Bridge replacement
and HOV projects $500 million
3 1-405 Corridor
Improvements (total) $990 million
Bridge Seismic retrofit $87 million
�-
In total, 265 new transportation projects
t
Y
Major Local Projects:
...
Rainier/Hardie Aves.
" ''
•
m Widen and
complete
- sidewalks.
Provide Q,.•_
landscape
medians
Improve -
" ` pedestrian °"aifii6YAvaf�u
+ g.
access and •:
'A, safety ImpibV�lm
r•
A Grant Funding
r-In
addition to the transportation
projects funded by the gas tax, the
,=
following grants would also be funded
- Small City Pavement Program
- Safe Routes to Schools
— Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
3
11
PARK TERRACE ANNEXATION - EXPANDED PUBLIC HEARING
EXPANDED ANNEXATION AND PROPOSED R-8 & R-10 ZONING
October 17, 2005
The Boundary Review Board for King County notified the City on July 16, 2005 that the Park
Terrace — Expanded Annexation, had been approved by that body. The original 7.65-acre Park
Terrace Subdivision annexation site was expanded to approximately 80-acres by bringing in the
so called "hook", a peninsula of unincorporated King County along 138th Avenue SE that is
surrounded by the City along approximately 85% of its perimeter. Staff noted at the July 12,
2004 public meeting that it was possible that the Boundary Review Board at a later date would
expand the original boundaries to include this enlarged area. Council held the first of two
required public hearings on future zoning for the expanded annexation on September 12, 2005.
Tonight's continued hearing is the second of two required public hearings on the now enlarged
area.
The expanded annexation site abuts the City on its western, northern, southern, and most of its
eastern boundaries (see map on reverse side). 138th Avenue SE (Duvall Avenue NE), if extended,
defines portions of its eastern and western boundaries. Also, it is the major arterial that bisects
this expanded annexation area.
The expanded area includes 112 existing dwelling units and is expected to grow to 206 dwelling
units at full development. There are some major anticipated costs, primarily for road
resurfacing, associated with the expanded annexation area.
Council is holding tonight's continued public hearing to further consider whether it wishes to
accept the expanded 80-acre annexation site, and if it does, what future zoning for it should be.
Renton's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map shows two designations for this area, Residential
Medium Density (RM) for a small area at the northern tip of this unincorporated peninsula, and
Residential Single Family (RS) for the majority of area remaining to the south. To be consistent
with these land use designations the northern portion would most likely be zoned R-10, ten units
per net acre, and the remaining area, R-8, eight units per net acre.
The Administration is recommending that Council:
• Accept the recommendation of the Boundary Review Board to expand the original 7.65-
acre Park Terrace Annexation to 80-acres by bringing in the unincorporated peninsula to
the north,
• Hold the first reading of the ordinance annexing the Park Terrace — Expanded
Annexation into the City,
• Hold the first reading of the ordinance rezoning approximately 3.4 acres toRenton's R-
10 zone, and
Hold the first reading of the ordinance rezoing approximately 63 acres to Renton's R-8
zone.
N
(*P
City of Renton
PUBLIC INFORMATION HANDOUT
October 17, 2005
STREET VACATION PETITION
VAC-05-003
For additional information, please contact: Karen McFarland;
City of Renton Technical Services 425.430.7209
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will hear a proposal requesting the vacation of an unopened portion of
Aberdeen Ave NE right-of-way, 30' in width and 255' in length. The requested vacation
area is shown on the accompanying map exhibit.
SUMMARY:
A vacation petition was received on July 28, 2005, from Ronald G. Dohrn. The portion
of right-of-way included in this petition was dedicated in the plat of C.D. Hillman's Lake
Washington Garden of Eden Division No. 7 on July 22, 1907.
The City has no facilities in the area of this vacation. However, the Coal Creek Utility
District, the water and wastewater service provider for this vacation area does have an
8" water line in the south half of the requested area.
The petitioner plans to use the requested vacation area in the proposed Dohrn Short
Plat development. According to the petitioner, the public benefit provided by the
proposed vacation would be to reduce limitations on development of the site and to
reduce future congestion. Furthermore, the petitioner contends that development of
this right-of-way into a road would unnecessarily duplicate the access provided by 113th
Ave SE.
None of the City Departments surveyed have objections to the vacation. The PBPW
Department's Water Utility and Wastewater Utility Sections and the Fire Department all
noted that the requested area fell within the Coal Creek Utility District's service area
and have no objections to the proposed right-of-way vacation provided that the Coal
Creek Utility District receives any easements which are necessary to protect its
facilities.
As established by RCW 35.79.030, the street vacation petition, if granted, must be
approved by the City Council through ordinance after a public hearing is held. The City
shall receive compensation in accordance with RCW 35.79.030 for the vacated alley.
The ordinance shall be recorded with King County once it is in effect.
Vicinity Map
Street Vacation VAC-05-003
Petitioner: Ronald Dohrn
NE 40th St
City
Limits
0
4j
W
0
z
3
=
al
0
w
Z
��p
Q
>
a�
v
3
Proposed
Vacation
Area
Vicinity Map
0 150 300
1:1800
•®Technical Services
• planning/Building/public Works
K. McFarland
O Sept. 12. 2005
Public Hearing
on
VACATI
VACowO5,--,003
Octo,
r 17, 2005
LOCATION
LOCATION
Lake
Washington
Kennydale
Beach Park
_®lamCity •
■���a��®!11
Area of
Vacation
Request
LOCATION
LOCATION
z
0
U
O
a
-'+.-, •��+ y'�,g lip +fig ,�iiy�, F:< � ., A, �°'� x",�.�. - .�, n r _ ��,
J•'"�.�7 q. T q Y� 1' � ' X
f
W
x �T" � 9Y A ;. � 3 f" R t' ,'�b" A. . 3' s�''. - _k �� r^§ � .•-0e q
`,s r. � �y4 '".xa "a. # fi x a "y a a � t t�• F s "t �"°S ° � t .� Z ,*
Tv
Ra
k
Aa 1
all
w
yk
WAY A
l , tiy. !'
amok
MEN
Vic
VT
y * P
^t 8
k
MTV
i
LOCATION
BACKGROUND
• Petition received August 200 5
• Pursuant to State and City Code, more
than 2/3 of the abutting owners must
sign the petition
• 100% of abutting owners have signed
BACKGROUND
• Right-of-way dedicated in the plat
of C.D. Hillman's Lake Washington
Garden of Eden Division No. 7 on
July 227 190 7
• No City -owned facilities
Coal Creek Utility District's facilities
include an 8" water Line in a portion of
This R-O-W
PUBLIC BENEFIT
• Request associated with the proposed
Dohrn Short Plat.
• According to the petitioner, the public
benefit would be to reduce limitations on
development of the site .
• The petitioner also contends that
development of this right-of-way into a
road would unnecessarily duplicate the
access provided by I I 3th Ave SE.
NOTIFICATION
RESEARCH/SURVEY
9 Vacation request was circulated to
various City departments and outside
agencies for review
• No objections were raised
RESEARCH/SURVEY
Internal Review Comments
• Coal Creek Utility District's facilities:
— PBPW/Water and Wastewater Utility Sections
and the Fire Department all noted that the
requested area fell within the Coal Creek Utility
District's service area and have no objections to
the proposed vacation provided that the Coal
Creek Utility District receives any easements
which are necessary to protect its facilities
RESEARCH/SURVEY
Internal Review Comments
• EDNSP Department:
— made no formal recommendation
— EDNSP concerns:
• whether right-of-way necessary for future
transportation network
✓ Transportation Division looked at the area and
determined that roadway not necessary;
accordingly, Transportation has no objection
• whether the City of Newcastle had an opportunity to
comment on the proposed street vacation. ✓ YES
RESEARCH/SURVEY
Outside Agency Review Comments
• PSE, QWEST and Electric Lighiwave have no
facilities in the requested vacation area and have
indicated that no easement is needed.
• To date, Comcasi has not responded to the Ciiy's
request for comments.
• Coal'Creek Utility District has indicated that it has
an 8" waterline in the southern half of the
requested vacation area and that an easement will
be needed.
RESEARCH/SURVEY
Outside Agency Review Comments
• The City of Newcastle has not formally
responded. Through phone conversations,
staff learned that the City of Newcastle's
primary concern was to ensure that
Newcastle properties would not be
landlocked as a result of this proposed
vacation.
✓No properties in the area of the proposed
vacation would become landlocked.
The Planning/Building /Public Works
Department recommends that Council
approve the request to vacate subject to the
following conditions:
✓The petitioner shall provide satisfactory proof
that the Coal Creek Utility District has received
and is satisfied with any easements which are
necessary to protect its facilities in the
requested vacation area.
NEXT STEPS
If Council approves This vacation petition:
• Petitioner orders and submits an
appraisal
• Staff reviews the appraisal and returns
to Council so that compensation can
be set
The Planning/Building/Public Works
Department recommends that Council
approve the request to vacate subject to the
following conditions:
✓The petitioner shall provide satisfactory proof
that the Coal Creek Utility District has received
and is satisfied with any easements which are
necessary to protect its facilities in the
requested vacation area.
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
GENERAL INFORMATION
You are invited to attend a comprehensive emergency preparedness event this weekend at the Seattle
Exhibition Hall. The "Are You Ready?" event will be held on Friday, October 21st, and Saturday,
October 22nd, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. This free event is open to the public. Workshops and
speakers will be presented both days. Friday's emphasis is for working professionals and features a
special workplace preparedness series. Saturday is "family day" and includes a special preparedness
passport series for children. Product suppliers and experts in preparedness will be present to display
and sell emergency/safety products, services, and technologies. For more information, visit
www.Preparedness-AreYouReady.com.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• The Annual "Boo Carnival" is scheduled for Saturday, October 29th, at the Renton Community Center
from 10:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. for children ages 8 and under. Crafts, games, and inflatables will
entertain everyone. The event is co -sponsored by Stoneway Concrete. Call 425-430-6700 for more
information.
• The Annual Renton Senior Activity Center Craft Bazaar will be held on Saturday, October 29th, from
9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at the Renton Senior Center. Handmade crafts by Renton area senior citizens
will be available for purchase. Call 425-430-6633 for more information.
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The Washington State Department of Transportation will host an Open House related to the Renton
I-405 Nickel Improvement Project on Tuesday, November 1st, from 4:00 to 7:00 p.m. at the Renton
High School Commons, 400 South 2nd Street. The focus of the meeting will be to present findings of
the discipline reports drafted for the Environmental Assessment of the projects.
The Sound Transit Board met on October 13th. The Board unanimously and enthusiastically approved
the change to Sound Move that will provide Renton with a $19 million funding contribution for two
City of Renton projects: $15 million for the Rainier/Hardie Avenue Corridor improvements and $4
million for the SW 27th Street/Strander Extension project. This funding approval is the culmination
of extensive negotiations with Sound Transit initiated by Mayor Keolker-Wheeler and Sound Transit
Board members Connie Marshall, Julia Patterson, Fred Butler, and Jack Crawford, and with the
participation of Renton City Councilmembers Marcie Palmer and Don Persson.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact......
AJLS/City Clerk
Bonnie Walton, x6502
Subject:
Street Vacation Petition for a Portion of Lyons Ave.
NE, south of NE 4`h St.
(Petitioner: Robin Bales; File No. VAC-04-002)
Exhibits:
Minutes of 8/23/2004 & 7/11/2005
Ordinance
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
For Agenda of: 10/ 17/2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence.
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On August 23, 2004, the City Council held a public hearing and approved a vacation request,
submitted by Robin Bales, for a portion of Lyons Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St. On July 11,
2005, Council accepted the appraisal and set compensation at $13,100 for the right-of-way, 30
feet in width and approximately 100 feet in length. On August 19, 2005, the City Clerk
received the compensation amount of $13,100. The Utility Systems Division has since
confirmed that no other amounts are due, and that all conditions of the vacation approval have
been satisfied. Therefore, the ordinance can be adopted to finalize the vacation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Finalize the street vacation by adopting the ordinance
cc: Karen McFarland
X
/:/
X
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
August 23, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 284
Vacation: Lyons Ave NE,
Bales, VAC-04-002
• All residential buildings shall be detached single-family residential
buildings;
• All future residential lots within the site that directly abut the site's south
boundary shall have a minimum lot width of 50 feet; and
• The net residential density of any development of the site shall not exceed
ten dwelling units per net acre.
Mr. Erickson pointed out that since the election ballot stated "annexation with
R-8 zoning," staff recommends that the site be initially annexed into the City
with R-8 zoning and then be rezoned to R-10 in order to be consistent with
Comprehensive Plan designation and the provisions of the development
agreement. Mr. Erickson stated that the proposed annexation furthers City
business goals, is consistent with City policies, and is supported by the
Boundary Review Board. He noted that the fiscal implications, except for
parks, appear to be relatively minor. Mr. Erickson concluded that the best
interests and general welfare of the City appear to be served by this annexation.
Public comment was invited.
David Halinen, 10500 NE 8th St., Suite 1900, Bellevue, 98004, stated that he
represents the property owner, Liberty Ridge LLC, and thanked City staff for
their cooperation throughout this extended process. He urged Council to move
forward with the annexation as proposed.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY BRIERE,
SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL: ACCEPT
THE 9.61-ACRE TYDICO ANNEXATION SUBJECT TO THE VOTER
APPROVED PROVISIONS OF THE ELECTION BALLOT; REZONE THE
SUBJECT SITE, EXCLUDING PUBLIC STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO R-8
CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED BALLOT MEASURE; AND
SUBSEQUENT TO THE R-8 REZONE, REZONE THE SITE R-10, SUBJECT
TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
CURRENT RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND
USE DESIGNATION.*
Council President Persson noted that the integrity of the existing community
will be protected, and he thanked the Administration for responding to the
adjacent neighbor's concerns.
*MOTION CARRIED. (See page 291 for ordinances.)
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
public hearing to consider the street vacation petition submitted by Steve Beck
on behalf of Bales Limited Partnership for a portion of approximately 100 feet
of the remaining unopened 30-foot right-of-way of old Lyons Ave. NE, an
unimproved road located between NE 3rd and 4th Streets, and between Jericho
Ave. NE and Nile Ave. NE (VAC-04-002).
Karen McFarland, Engineering Specialist, explained that this vacation request
is associated with the Amber Lane Short Plat currently in preliminary
development. She relayed that the petitioner said this vacation serves the
August 23, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 285
APPEAL
Planning & Development
Committee
Appeal: Dalpay Estates
Division 11 Short Plat,
Barfknecht, SBP-03-125
public benefit by removing unusable right-of-way that will allow for a better
configuration of lots. Ms. McFarland reported that no objections about the
proposed vacation were received from City departments and outside agencies.
The City will obtain an easement at a later date through the development
process after it has been determined where to place the facilities. Currently, no
public facilities are contained in the right-of-way.
In conclusion, Ms. McFarland stated that staff recommends Council approve
the request to vacate the street right-of-way. If approved, the applicant will
submit an appraisal, and the matter will come before Council again once the
appraisal is reviewed, for determination of the compensation.
Public comment was invited.
Myles Ostheimer, 353 Lyons Ave. NE, Renton, 98059, stated that he lives east
of the area to be vacated. He indicated that he thought if the area to be vacated
were ever sold, he would have the ability to bid on at least 15 feet of the 30-foot
property.
Ms. McFarland noted that a portion of a previous vacation (VAC-01-006)
attached to Mr. Ostheimer's property. She stated if the subject vacation request
is approved, it would most likely attach to the property on the west.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
Council President Persson clarified that when there is a full -street right-of-way,
it is divided in two and the abutting property owners may buy the half that
attaches to their properties. He pointed out that a previous vacation dealt with
one-half of this right-of-way, and the subject vacation concerns the other one-
half. Therefore, the subject vacation would attach to the property on the west.
MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL APPROVE THE
REQUEST TO VACATE THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY. CARRIED.
Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report on the
appeal of the Dalpay Estates Division II Short Plat (SHP-03-125). The
Committee met on 8/19/2004 to consider the appeal of Paul Barfknecht and
Susan Bledsoe. This is an appeal of the decision of the Hearing Examiner
dated 4/13/2004. The subject property is located at 3801 NE 19th St. The
proposed land use action is a short plat, subdividing a 2.52-acre parcel into five
lots, for the development of five detached single-family residences.
The Committee found the following facts:
• The appellants are the neighbors of the subject property.
• There is a dispute between the appellants and the applicant regarding an
apparent encroachment on the applicant's property by the appellants.
• The 2.52-acre parcel could support the proposed short plat despite whether
the property encroached upon is awarded to the appellant in a civil action,
if any, between the parties.
• The Hearing Examiner did not render a decision regarding the legal rights
of the parties as they relate to the encroachment. The appellants appealed
this absence.
July 11, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 249
Vacation: Lyons Ave NE, Utility Systems Division reported submittal of the appraisal performed for the
Bales, VAC-04-002 vacation of a portion of Lyons Ave. NE, south of NE 4th St. (VAC-04-002;
Bales Limited Partnership), and requested that Council accept the appraisal and
set compensation for the right-of-way at $13,100. Council concur.
ESA: WRIA 8 Chinook Utility Systems Division recommended approval of the Water Resource
Salmon Conservation Plan Inventory Area (WRIA) 8 Chinook Salmon Conservation Plan. Refer to
Utilities Committee.
CAG: 04-027, SW 7th St Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-04-027, SW 7th St. Drainage
Drainage Improvement Phase Improvement Phase II; and requested approval of the project, authorization for
11, Frank Coluccio Const Co final pay estimate in the amount of $15,248.50, commencement of 60-day lien
period, and release of retainage bond to Frank Coluccio Construction Company,
contractor, if all required releases are obtained.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED TO REMOVE ITEM 8.n. FOR
SEPARATE CONSIDERATION. CARRIED.
Separate Consideration Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of the honorary
Item 8.n. naming of the Renton Municipal Airport as Clayton Scott Field.
Airport: Honorary Name, Councilwoman Palmer stated that Clayton Scott's 100th birthday is on July
Clayton Scott Field 15th, and rather than referring the item to the Transportation (Aviation)
Committee, she recommended approval. Councilman Corman expressed his
support for the action.
In response to Councilwoman Nelson's inquiry, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler stated
that the Renton Municipal Airport will remain the legal name.
In regards to the Airport signage, Councilwomen Nelson stated her preference
to list "Renton Municipal Airport" first, and then "Clayton Scott Field."
Councilman Corman noted the need to have a statue and plaque explaining the
honorary naming, pointing out that a proposed statue will be privately funded.
Councilman Persson stated that he wanted a cap placed on the expenditure for
the Airport signage, so the $5,000 proposed by staff is not exceeded without
further deliberation by Council.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE HONORARY NAMING OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AS
CLAYTON SCOTT FIELD WITH A $5,000 CAP ON THE EXPENDITURE
FOR THE SIGNAGE. CARRIED.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE
THE ADMINISTRATION TO PREPARE A PROCLAMATION TO BE
PRESENTED TO CLAYTON SCOTT AT HIS 100TH BIRTHDAY
CELEBRATION ON JULY 15, 2005. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval
Finance: Vouchers of Claim Vouchers 238902 - 239306 and two wire transfers totaling
$2,662,714.34; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 58109 - 58506, one wire
transfer, and 590 direct deposits totaling $1,998,413.29. MOVED BY
PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
VACATING A PORTION OF LYONS AVENUE NE, LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 144 FEET SOUTH OF NE 4TH STREET, ON THE
WESTERLY HALF OF THE ROAD, FOR A DISTANCE OF
APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET. (STEVE BECK & CORE DESIGN
[BALES] VAC 04-002).
WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of Lyons Avenue NE,
located approximately 144 feet south of NE 41h Street, on the westerly half of the road, was
filed with the City Clerk on June 15, 2004, and that petition was signed by the owners
representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to
be vacated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No_ 3702, passed on July 26, 2004, set
August 23, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time
and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of
this hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in
favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and
arguments presented to it; and
WHEREAS, the Administrator of the PlanningBuilding/Pubfic Works Department has
considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public
benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described portion of Lyons Avenue NE, to wit:
1
ORDINANCE NO.
A portion of Lyons Avenue NE, located approximately 144 feet south of NE
4"' Street, on the westerly half of the road, for a distance of approximately 100
feet, described more particularly in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and
made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein,
be and the same is hereby vacated.
SECTION H. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $13,100 (Thirteen
Thousand, One Hundred Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, which has been paid to the City.
SECTION M. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections,
and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1203:10/4/05:ma
2
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
2005.
day of 2005.
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
EXHIBIT A
CORE DESIGN, INC.
BELLEVUE WA 98007
Core Project No: 02087
4/16/04
Legal Description — Right -of -Way Vacation
That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington described
as follows:
COMMENCING at the northwest corner of Morgan Place H, according to the Short Plat
thereof recorded in Volume 152 of Plats, pages 248 and 248B under Recording No.
20020607900006, records of said county, thence S00°21'l3"W, along the west line of
said Short Plat and the east right-of-way margin of Lyons Avenue NE as established by
City of Renton Ordinance No. 4958, recorded under Recording No. 20020404000988,
records of said county, 144.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein
described tract; thence continuing S00°21' 13", along said west line and east margin
103.52 feet to the southwesterly corner of said Short Plat; thence N65'01'55"W, along
the northwesterly prolongation of the southerly line of said Short Plat 33.00 feet to the
east line of Tract 2, Black Loam five acre Tracts, according to the Plat thereof recorded in
Volume 12 of Plats, page 101, records of said county and the west right-of-way margin of
said Lyons Avenue NE; thence N00°21'l3"E, along the east line of said Tract 2 and west
margin 90.45 feet to the north line of the south half of said Tract 2; thence S88°21'I 1"E,
along the easterly prolongation of said north line, 30.01 feet; to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Contains 2,909 f square feet (0.0668 f acres)
C
"01N'911
/
1
15 — 1981.92
N-E- 41H ST-
FOUND 3" BRASS
SURFACE DISC
WITH PUNCH
TRACT 2
BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE
TRACTS. VOL 12. PG. 101
EXHIBIT B
1488-21'16"W
2642 56 MEA_ (2647.0 PLAT) _ _l0 11
660.64 j 5 14
d N
(S E. 128TH ST.)
N
d
N. LINE, S. 112 TRACT 2 N88-21*11"W
AREA OF RIGHT OF -
WAY TO BE VACATED
REC. NO. 20021009002754
AMBER LANE
RIGHT OF WAY VACATION
WuBff
30'
2v a
1 a
�ct:
<8
h
_j 2: M
N
0
0
z
1
MORGAN PLACE 11
VOL 152, PG'S_
248-2486.
REC. NO.
20020607900006
1 FOUND 3" BRASS
— SURFACE DISK STAMPED
"KING COUNTY MON"
W/PUNCH RENTON
CONTROL MON_ NO_
1852
2
1
PAGE
I OF I
1 14711 1E 2M F6, # 101
acn�, wof4r.oa.. v8007
125.6857877 Fox 425.8857963
��� / DESIGN
ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVEYING
JOB [V4_ 02087
N
I�
SCALE- 1' = 60
0 30 60
37555
�� tCldTt4t�
UNAL LX�
FXPIIiSS_ 4/29/06
CITY OF REN"TON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of: 10/17/2005
Dept/'Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton, x6502
Consent .............. X
Public Ilearing..
Subject:
Street Vacation Petition for a Portion of N. 14" St.,
Correspondence.
Last of Lakc Washington Blvd. N. and Gcne Coulon
Ordinance ............. X
Beach Park
Resolution............
(Petitioner: Pool Bros. Construction, LLC; File No.
Old Business........
V A C -05-00 l )
New Business.......
1:Xlltbtts:
Minutes of4/4/2005 & 7/11/2005
Study Sessions......
Ordinance
Information.........
jRcconiniendcd Action:
Council Concur
11--Tsc31lnnpact: - —
F.\pcuditure Required...
Amount Budgeted.....-.
7 otal Project Budget
N/A
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
"Transfer/Amendment.......
Revenue Generated.........
City Share "Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On April 4, 2005, the City Council held a public hearing and approved a vacation request,
suhmittcd by Pool Bros. Construction, LLC, for a portion of N. 14"' Street, also known as the
southerly half of Morgan Avenue or SE 1 10`t' St., east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Gene
Coulon Beach Park. On July 11, 2005, Council accepted the appraisal and set compensation at
` 21.285 tOr the right-of-way, 30 feet in width and approximately 303.77 feet in length. On
September 21, 2005, the City Clerk received the compensation amount of $21,285. The Utility
Systems Division has since confirmed that no other amounts are due, and that all conditions of
the vacation approval have been satisfied. Therefore, the ordinance can be adopted to finalize
the vacation.
STAFF RECONINIENDATION:
Finalize the street vacation by adopting the ordinance
cc Karen McFarland
X
Kenti�nucUaienhill: till
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
April 4, 2005
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF
TERRI BRIERE, Council President; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; DON
COUNCILMEMBERS
PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY
LAW, COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS TONI NELSON
AND RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED.
CITY STAFF IN
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief
ATTENDANCE
Administrative Officer; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney;
BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; KAREN MCFARLAND,
Engineering Specialist; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development
Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; DEREK TODD, Assistant to
the CAO; COMMANDER KATHLEEN MCCLINCY, Police Department.
PROCLAMATION
A proclamation by Mayor Keolker-Wheeler was read declaring the month of
Records and Information
April, 2005, to be "Records and Information Management Month" in the City of
Management Month - April,
Renton and encouraging all citizens to recognize the important service
2005
performed by records and information professionals and to join in this special
observance.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION Economic Development Administrator Alex Pietsch announced that the Puget
EDNSP: Airport Compatible Sound Regional Council (PSRC), an entity in charge of coordinating planning
Land Use Program, VISION and growth management implementation for King, Pierce, Snohomish, and
2020 Award from PSRC Kitsap counties, honored Renton's Airport Compatible Land Use Program with
its VISION 2020 award. He noted that PSRC annually recognizes projects that
best demonstrate growth management and this is the fourth VISION 2020
award bestowed upon Renton within the past five years. Mr. Pietch stated that
the project was completed in 2003 and 2004 and involved a significant amount
of research due in part to the Airport's urban location.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Vacation: N 14th St, Pool
Brothers Construction, VAC-
05-001
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
public hearing to consider the Pool Brothers Construction, LLC petition to
vacate an approximately 300-foot-long and 30-foot-wide portion of N. 14th St.,
located east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Gene Coulon Beach Park (VAC-
05-041).
Karen McFarland, Engineering Specialist, stated that the petitioner plans to use
the subject vacation area in a cafe and office development on the adjoining site
to the south. She relayed that according to the petitioner, a larger lot will be
created to allow for more attractive landscaping and for development in a
manner consistent with the City's vision of the lakefront area.
Ms. McFarland pointed out that the vacation area does not contain any City
facilities. She also pointed out that no objections were raised when the
vacation request was circulated to City departments and outside agencies. In
conclusion, Ms. McFarland stated that staff recommends approval of the
requested vacation.
July 11, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 250
Human Resources: Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending
Reclassification of Four concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve reclassification of
Positions positions and pay ranges that do not require additional 2005 budget
appropriation as follows:
Police Manager, grade m34 to m36, $4,392 budget change through 2005; and
Civil Engineer III (New Title - Utility/GIS Engineer), grade a27 to a31, $7,452
budget change through 2005.
The above changes are effective 1/l/2005.
Housing Assistance Specialist (New Title - Housing Repair Coordinator), grade
a18 to a20, $1,708 budget change through 2005; and
Housing Maintenance Worker (New Title - Housing Repair Technician), grade
a07 to a08, $1,309 budget change through 2005.
The above changes are effective 6/l/2005.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Plannine & Development
Committee
Vacation: N 14th St, Pool
Brothers Construction, VAC-
05-001
Planning and Development Committee Vice Chair Law presented a report
recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation for the N. 14th St.
street vacation, located east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park, to accept the appraisal and set compensation at $21,285
for the vacation (VAC-05-001; Pool Brothers Construction, LLC, petitioner).
MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
RESOLUTIONS AND
The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption:
ORDINANCES
Resolution #3760
A resolution was read approving the Shamrock Heights II Final Plat;
Plat: Shamrock Heights 11,
approximately 4.8 acres located west of Lyons Ave. NE, east of Jericho Ave.
Lyons Ave NE, FP-04-148
NE, and north of NE 4th St. (FP-04-148). MOVED BY BRIERS, SECONDED
BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ.
CARRIED.
Planning: Multi -Family
Second reading of the ordinance concerning the multi -family housing property
Housing Property Tax
tax exemption modifications was postponed.
Exemption Modifications
The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance #5149
An ordinance was read amending Title VI (Police Regulations) of City Code by
Police: Street Racing Event
adding Chapter 6-27, Race Attendance, that prohibits race attendance within a
Attendance Prohibition
"No Racing Zone" and imposes criminal penalties. MOVED BY LAW,
SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ.*
Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes noted the ordinance language revision
that occurred after the first reading of the ordinance.
*ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
Responding to Councilman Corman's inquiry, Ms. Fontes confirmed that signs
will be posted in the designated "No Racing Zone" areas.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
VACATING A PORTION OF N. 14TH STREET EAST OF LAKE
WASHINGTON BLVD. N. AND GENE COULON BEACH PARK (POOL
BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C., PETITIONERS; VAC-05-001).
WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of N. 14t' Street east of Lake
Washington Blvd. N. and Gene Coulon Beach Park, was filed with the City Clerk on
January 24, 2005, and that petition was signed by the owners representing more than two-
thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to be vacated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3740, passed on March 7, 2005, set
April 46, 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and
place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this
hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or
in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and
arguments presented to it; and
WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has
considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public
benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described portion of N. 14'' Street, to wit:
A portion of N. 14th Street east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Gene
Coulon Beach Park, described more particularly in Exhibits "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein,
be and the same is hereby vacated.
1
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION H. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $21,285 (Twenty -
One Thousand, Two Hundred and Eighty -Five Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, which has been
paid to the City.
SECTION M. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections,
and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1205:10/4/05:ma
2
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
2005.
Exhibit A
Legal Description — Street Vacation (Portion of North 14th Street):
The southerly 30 feet of the 60-foot right-of-way delineated as Morgan Avenue in C.D.
Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Division 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in
Volume 11 of Plats, Page 83, Records of King County, Washington, lying westerly of State
Highway 405 and easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard North.
Situate in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North,
Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington.
EXHIBIT B
Vicinity Neap
Street Vacation VAC-05-001
Petitioner: Pool Brothers Construction, LLC
Gene Coulon
Beach Park
N. 14th St.
Vacation Request
Vicinity Map
0 200 400
bmummad
1:2400
tenTechnical Services
♦ Planning/Building/Public Yorks
�-/ IL McFarland
Feb. 25. 2005
I-405
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA
Al #:
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of: 10/17/2005
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton, x6502
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
City of Renton Contracts List
Correspondence..
Third Quarter 2005
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
List of contracts and addenda signed from July 1
Study Sessions......
through September 30, 2005
Information......... X
Recommended Action:
None; Information only
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The contract list shows all agreements executed between the City and outside parties and/or
agencies during the third quarter of 2005. There were 56 contracts and 16 addenda, totaling
$8,700,156.66.
2005 Contract List
Third Quarter 2005
I APPROVALCOD/ UN� ENS NAME/TITLE AVOiNUMBER�: I EXPURPOSE DATE
A ( DIV
King County Roads Add spawning gravel to the Cedar River downstream of the
CAG-02-134 Adden #3-05 Maintenance Divisioin 34,079.65 Landsburg Bridge; project begins August 2005
CAG-03-033 Adden #2-05
Perteet Engineering, Inc.
N/A Extend completion date to 9/30/2005
Strander Blvd./SW 27th St. Connection Project Phase 1,
CAG-03-033_ Adden #3-05
Perteet_Engineering, Inc.
110,846.00 Segment 1 Construction Management Services
'NE Sunset Blvd/Duvall Ave. NE Obligates Funds for
CAG-03-041 Adden #1-05
WA Transportation
586,000.00!Construction
CAG-03-080 Adden #1-05
� _
Interlocal/Port of Seattle
- --- N/A Valley Special Response Team
'Roth Hill Engineering
Additional Design Services for Sanitary Sewer and I & I
CAG-03_102 Adden #2-05
Partners LLC
43 250.00'Program
_
_ -
Waterline Drafting on Duvall Ave NE - Extend completion
CAG-03-131- Adden #5-05
Berger/Abam Engineers Inc.
_ _ _ _ --___ 0.00 date from 7/31/2005 to 7/31/2006
CAG-03-132 Adden #5 OS
' Ber er/Abam Inc.
gEngineers-- -
-
Services forSunset/DuvallIntersection
19,500.00 -- - - -
Add�ional design for or roect'sroadwa infrastructure
p J Y
CAG-04-013 Adden #4-05
I W&H Pacific
11,092.00 improvements to support redevelopment by Harvest Partners
CAG-04_117 Adden #2-05
Canbor Corps
- 3,642.78'Changes to the maintenance schedule for sites 12 & 27-
CAG-04-146 Adden #1 05
WSDOT
3,185,541.00 SR 169 HOV Lanes & Queue Jump Improvements Phase 2
King County Office of Extension of project timeline for Level A Suit SCBA
CAG-04-160 Adden #1-05 i Emergency_ Management N/A Connection Pass Throughs (FFY03 -UASI-03 1) -
- --- - ------ King County Office of � -- -- - -- - -- -- Extension of project timeline for Radiation Dosimeters
8/8/2005 U
7/7/2005 T
9/22/2005 - T
- 7/28/2005__ ---T
8/25/2005 by
City POL
9/7/2005 L--U-
7/22/2005
T
9/27/2005-
T
---- -
--- -- --
9/21/2005
- T
i
7/11/2005 -�
PA
9/27/2005 by
_City---T
-T -
9/14/2005 F
CAG-04-160 Adden #2-05 Emergency Management - N/k(FFY03-UASI-033) 9/14/2_0_0.5 F
Healthcare Management
-_ - Replacing certain language in CAG-OS-042 8/12/2005 HR
CAG-05-042 Adden #3-05 Administrators ---- - - N/A' - - - - - -_ _-- }- R
CAG-05-046 Adden #1-05 TruGreen Land Care 3,083.301Create and plant City Hall Monument Flower Bed 8/18/2005 PA
H:/City Clerk/Contract Log 2005.xls Page 1 10/12/2005
2005 Contract List
Third Quarter 2005
:CONTRACT ADDENDUM/ AMOUNT .:-:-:PURPOSE PURPOSE I APPROVAL I DI.:
NUMBER EXTENSION NAME/TITLE
CAG-05-052
CAG-05-073
CAG-05-078
CAG-05-085 -
CAG-05-089
CAG-05-098
CAG-05-102
CAG-05_104
CAG-05-108
CAG-05-109
CAG-05-110
CAG-05-111
CAG-05-111
Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park Boat Launch Repair
Global Diving & Salvage
109 168.08 Project
7/25/2005 PA
(Western
Asphalt Inc. :_
875,181 04'2005 Street Overlay
7/21/2005 T
_
Valley Electric Co. of Mt.
_ -t_
Vernon Inc.
178,805_30'II Traffic
S 4th St & Burnett Av S Trac Improvements
8/3/2005 T
_
—
VJM Construction Co.
666,822.14:Talbot Hill Water main Replacement Project Phase II
i
8/5/2005 U
Epic Construction LLC -,
118,374.401P_3 Parking Lot Resurfacing Project - - _
_8/12/2005 PA_
Sanders General
Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) Cedar River Park Access
Construction LLC
-972,213.00-Improvements
! 8/24/2005 '
T
-
YWCA
23,000.0012005
Domestic Violence Advocacy Services
7/5/2005
HS
Hamilton/Saunderson
Marketing Partnership
g p
1
40,OO�Putting on the Valley medical Center Cinema on the Piazza
_ 7/5/2005
ED
_
Pacific Groundwater Group
i Hydrogeologic Services to Evaluate Causes for Cedar Valley
--
(PGG)
�-
_ 9,482.00 Aquifer Level Declines
39 482.00i -- ----__ - -
7/7_/2005 - U
g-- Y Emergency
Kin Count Emer enc
Medical Services
�
Security Rule of the Health Insurance Portability
Accountability Act of 1996 as CAG-03-121
A N A!_
9/2/2005 F
_ per
Visiting Nurse Services of
'(the Northwest
1 500 00
2005 Mental Health Program Support
7/11/2005
HS
2005 Community Development Block Grant Funds (Grant j
--_ - I amount $326,327 8/3/2005
Kin Count CDGB Funds � _ N/A ',
Amendment correcting budget line item on Exhibit III (Grant 9/22/2005 by
Adden #1-05 JKing County CDGB Funds N/A amount $9,460) City
--- ! --
CAG-05-112 39,250.00 isla
DougLe Outcomes b - — 2005/2006 Legislative Consultant Services _ !Doug Levy" Y g--- � 7/15/2005
Dou
CAG-05-113 Group Health Cooperative 287,000.00 1 2005 Agreements for Group Health Medical
HS
HS
ED
7/21/2005 ; HR
H:/City Clerk/Contract Log 2005.xls Page 2 10/12/2005
2005 Contract List
Third Quarter 2005
CONTRACT.*
ADDENDUM/
CONTRACT
APPROVAL:
NUMBER .::
E:XTENSION
NAIVIE%TITLE
AMOUNT
PURPOSE
DATE
Marine Vacuum Service,
CAG-05-114
Inc.
207,500.00 Riverview Park Bridge Renovation
8/26/2005
PA
CAG-05-115
WSDOT
N/A Johns Creek Outfall Concurrence Letter
7/21/2005
U
UW Office of Regional
Develop/implement a fagade improvement project or
CAG-05-116
1 Affairs
10,000.00 "Storefront Studio" for historic downtown Renton
7/21/2005
�- ED
Remove existing play area at Kennydale Lions Park &
CAG-05-117
',Young Life Construction
32,671.82'construct new play area
7/25/2005
PA
- -
Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mercer Island for
-
CAG-05-121
City of Mercer Island
N/A Housing Inmates in the Renton City Jail
7/28/2005
POL
CAG-05-122
,Puget Sound Energy
80 537.19'Maple-Valley Highway Improvents: Phase I - PSE Relocation
8/3/2005
T
--`--
_
MacLeod Reckord
Professional Design Services in Connection with Burnett
fi
CAG-05-123
jLandscape Architects
18,815.00 Linear Park Play Area Project
8/2/2005
PA
Interlocal Agreement to Receive Community Development
CAG-05-124
King County
_ - -
'
N/Ai Block Grant Funds (Grant amount $283,361)
8/11/2005
HS
Interlocal Agreement with the City of Burien for Housing
CAG-05-125
City of Burien
N/A, Inmates in the Renton City Jail
8/3/2005
j POL
CAG-05-126
CAG-05-127
CAG-05-128
CAG-05-129
CAG-05-130
CAG-05-131
Phinney/Bischoff Design
House 4
HDR Engineering
-- -_ -__- signers Plus --
Multi -Service Center
Communities in Schools of
Renton- _
Elder r Health
INW/Connection
00 City Web Page Design
50,000.00 i Preparation of Port Quendall Access Study
Design an exit stairway for the Maintenance Shop at Renton
-13,247_10 Municipal Airport
2005 CDBG Employment Development and related support
28,694.00 services
9.460.001,2005 CDBG Family Liaison Contract
9,460.00 1 2005 CDBG Adult Day Health Contract
8/4/2005 E
8/8/2005 I. ED
8/8/2005 T
8/11/2005 1 HS
8/10/2005 I HS
8/11/2005 j HS
HICity Clerk/Contract Log 2005.xls Page 3 10/12/2005
2005 Contract List
Third Quarter 2005
CONTRACT ADDETLDUM/ CONTRACT APPROVAL
-NUMBER . EXTENSION NAME/TITLE AMOUNT PURPOSE ( DATE:
Domestic Abuse Womens'
CAG-05-132 Network 10,424.0012005 CDBG Shelter Programs 8/11/2005 HS
Visiting Nurse Services of
CAG-05-133 the Northwest 9,460.00112_00_5 CDBG_ Health Assessments Contract 8/10/2005 HS
Federal Aviation
CAG-05-135Administration N/A'Conduct Airport Layout Plan Update 8/19/2005 A
Department of Justice - Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Project:
CAG-05-137 _ Bureau of Justice Assistance' Domy �estic Violence Advocacy Assistance Program $39,120)8/24/2005 POL
- -- ---- -------- -- Duane Hartman & -N/A i - — - -- ---- - --- ---- --- -------- -
CAG-05-138 Associates, Inc. 31,248.00 Renton Municipal Airport Base Map Updates 8/19/2005 T
CAG-05-139 KPG Inc. — - - 115,639 07' Hardie Av Trans it-Multimodal Improvement Roadway Project 8/19/2005 T
- - --
Northwest Hydraulic
CAG-05-140 - Consultants -Inc. 17,990.00'IAnnual Cedar River Cross Section Surveys 8/19/2005 U
1
CAG-05-141 Loomis, Fargo & Co. 26,314_00',Armored Car Services 8/22/2005 FIN
CAG-05-142 WSDOT - N/A Funding Implementation of State Commute Trip Reduction 9/7/2005 T
I Implementation of City -Wide Commute Trip Reduction
CAG-05-143 (King County Transportation__ 35 828.O0 1Program 9/20/2005 T
Community Health Centers
CAG-05-145 of King County 13 284.002005 CDBG Dental Contract _ 8/25/2005 HS
Emergency Feeding Program
CAG-05-146 of Seattle and King County — 12,318.00 2005 CDBG Emergency Feeding Program
- L8/29/2005 -'i HS
- ---- ---- - --- - - -- ------ ----- - -
_ CAG-_0_5_-_147 _ RH2 Engineering, Inc. 229,608.00�Consultant Services for Design of Hazen 565 Zone Reservoir 9/7/2005_ U
- Annual Parts & Preventive Maintenance for Live Fire Training 8/26/2005 by
CAG-05_148 t Kidde Fire Trainers, Inc. J 41 040.00 i System City F
----- --- � 9/7/2005 by --
CAG-05-149 Bates Technical College FirefighterN/A , Training Agreement for Recruits city F
H:/City Clerk/Contract Log 2005.xls Page 4 10/12/2005
2005 Contract List
Third Quarter 2005
CONTRACT: ADDENDUM/;: CONTRACT
APPROVAL:
NUMBER EXTEN.MON : NAME/T1TLE AMOUNT PURPOSE DATE DIV:::
FEMA Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG)
_ { _ _ _ to supplement the OEM Budget, Contract #E05-237 9/8/20_05 F
y p New World Systems Corp software maintenance agreement or li
CAG_-OS-150 I _ WA State Military Dept. N/A _
CAG-05-151 New World S stesm Corp. 83,348.00_ ':Police Department 9/8/2005 F
King County/City of Signals & Related Equipment along the Trans -Valley 9/22/2005 by
- - - - - - - - -- - r------- Corridor. City T
CAG-OS-152 - -- _ Tukwila - - 50,000 00'', --- - _ - _-.- - _-
URS Group, Inc. (URS
CAG-05-153 _ Corporation) _ 129,257.19 Airport Layout Plan Update 9/22/2005 T
Geneva Court Homeowners
CAG-05-154 !Association i 1,544.00 Retention Pond Improvements and add fencing 9/27/2005 ED
i
Ginger Creek Neighborhood
CAG-05-155 Association 1,538.00 Urban Park Improvements 9/27/2005 ED
North Renton Nelghborhood -� - -- ----- __ I -- --- ------ i _ --
- -- - --'I - - - - -- — -
CAG-05-156 Association 12,586.00 _ - ! Beautification of Sartori Educational Center - _ 9/27/2005 ED
T----- it Cedric Homeowners� -- --_--------— i -
CAG-05-157 Association 737.00,Right-of-Way Landscape Improvements ,I 9/27/2005 ED
Valle Vue Homeowners
CAG-05-158 Association - _ 2,600.00_ Neighborhood Tree Planting _9/27/2005 ED
King County Office of FFY03-UASI-035 Operational Plans Revisions to be
CAG-05-160 _T Emergency Management N/Aperformed by Hanson Professional Services, Inc.) 9/13/2005 F
Hanson Professional Provide facility planning tool related to hazardous materials
CAG-05-161 Services, Inc_ _ 12,000.00 [(reimbursed by grant from King County CAG-05-160) 9/27/2005___ 1 F
Permanent-- -
CAG-05-168 Solutions, Inc. Concrete
In�� _ 15,177.60 Kitchen Floor Resurfacing at the Maplewood Golf Course 9/19/9/2005 PA
56 Contracts
16 Addenda
TOTALS 8,700,156.66
H:/City Clerk/Contract Log 2005.xis Page 5 10/12/2005
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact......
Community Services
Sylvia Allen, X6609
Subject:
Contract with MIG, Inc. to complete the Long Range
Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan update
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Contract
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Al #: ,
, For Agenda of. Oct 17, 2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Approvals:
Legal Dept ......... X
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $50,000 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... 2005-$25,000 Revenue Generated.........
2006-$25,000
Total Project Budget not to exceed $50,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
A Statement of Qualifications and Request for Proposal was published in May of 2005 inviting
consultants to submit a list of three similar projects previously worked on and their relevant
qualifications. A total of four submittals were received and MIG was selected.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve hiring a consultant to complete the Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space and
Trails Plan update, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract with MIG, Inc. in
the amount of $50,000.
/V
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bb
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: October 10, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: I,- Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
FROM: -�/' . Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Sylvia Allen, Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Contract To Update the Long Range Parks, Recreation,
Open Space and Trails Plan
ISSUE:
The existing Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan was completed
in 1992. A current plan (one that is updated every seven years) is required to qualify for
grants.
RECOMMENDATION:
Council concur with staff recommendation and authorize the Mayor to execute the
contract to update the Long Range Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Trails Plan.
BACKGROUND:
A consultant was hired in 2001 to update the plan; however, this contract was terminated
due to the poor quality of work. An abbreviated document was produced in-house to
enable the City to apply for grants but it did not go through the entire SEPA process.
This authorization will allow the City to hire a firm to consolidate the work done by the
first consultant and our staff and use it to complete a SEPA approved plan and be in
compliance with current grant requirements.
Attachments
Cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Leslie Betlatch, Parks Director
Jerry Rerecich, Recreation Manager
h:\cs_admin\comprehensive plan\2005 long range plan update\issue paper on comp plan update contract.doc
1�Y �
.. (C)
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
NT°� CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
This agreement, made and entered into this 1 day of October, 2005, by and between
the City of Renton, hereafter called the "City," and MIG, Inc., hereafter called the
"Consultant." The Consultant agrees to provide professional consulting services to
produce an an update to the Long Range Parks, Recreation, and Trails Plan.
The City agrees to compensate the Consultant as set forth below under payment of
fees.
A. SCOPE OF WORK/BASIC SERVICES:
The Consultant agrees to provide consulting services as outlined in the
"Proposed Work Program," Exhibit A.
B. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
See Exhibit A.
C. ADDED SERVICES
Any additional services will be in writing.
D. REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
None, unless authorized prior to work. If work is started without written
authorization, it will be at the expense of the consultant.
E. PAYMENT TO THE CONSULTANT
Payment for services shall be made by the City to the Consultant for completed
work on a monthly basis. Such payment shall be the full compensation for work
performed, services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment
and incidentals necessary to complete the work. All billings for compensation for
work performed under this agreement will list actual time and dates during which
work was performed, the title of the Consultant employees doing the work and
the compensation shall be figured using the standard hourly rates submitted by
the Consultant.
Total payment for this work as listed under Basic Services shall not exceed
50 000 including Washington State Sales Tax, without a written addendum to
this contract, agreed to and signed by both parties.
F. TIME OF COMPLETION
Page 1
All work shall be completed no later than 12 months from the date of this
contract.
G. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The Consultant shall submit a completed Insurance Form, meeting all the
requirements contained in Exhibit B.
2. The Consultant shall provide the City with a 30-day notice of cancellation or
non -renewal of insurance.
H. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon ten (10) days written
notice should the other party fail substantially to perform in accordance with its
terms through no fault of the other, subject to the non -performing party curing
any failure to perform within said ten (10) days. Should failure to perform be
cured within ten (10) days, then this contract shall remain in full force and effect.
In the event of termination, the Consultant shall be paid for services performed
up to the termination date and accepted by the City.
In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys,
drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by the Consultant
shall become the City's property, and the Consultant shall be entitled to receive
just and equitable compensation for any work completed on such documents
and other materials.
1. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
The City and the Consultant each binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns,
and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the
partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with
respect to all covenants of the Agreement.
J. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL STATE AND
LOCAL LAWS
Except to the extent permitted by a bonafide occupational qualification, the
Consultant agrees as follows:
The Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for
employment because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, physical,
sensory or mental handicaps or marital status. The Consultant will take
affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are
treated during employment without regard to their race, creed, color, national
origin, sex, age, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital status. Such
action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading,
demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination,
rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.
Page 2
The Consultant will, in all solicitations for employees' job orders placed with any
employment agency or other firm or agency, state that all qualified applicants will
receive consideration for employment without regard for race, creed, color,
national origin, sex, age, physical, sensory or mental handicaps, or marital
status. The words "equal opportunity employer" in advertisements shall
constitute compliance with this paragraph.
The Consultant will include the provisions of the foregoing paragraphs in every
subcontract or purchase order for the goods or services which are subject matter
of this contract.
In the event of non-compliance by the Consultant with any of the non-
discrimination provisions of the contract, the Owner shall have the right, at its
option, to cancel the contract in whole or in part. If the contract is canceled after
part performance, the City shall be obligated to pay the fair market value or the
contract price, whichever is lower, for goods or services which have been
received and accepted.
The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal,
state and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion
of the project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws and workman's
compensation.
The City requires all businesses and individuals doing business in Renton to
have and maintain a current City of Renton business license. (For information,
contact licensing at 425-430-6925.
K. ARBITRATION
Arbitration of all questions of dispute under this Agreement shall be at the choice
of either party and shall be in accordance with the provisions, then obtaining, of
the laws of the State of Washington. The results of arbitration shall be binding
on both parties. The arbitrator shall make written findings of fact and
conclusions and that appeal of the arbitrator's decision shall be only for errors in
fact or law or if the decision of the arbitrator is arbitrary and capricious. Choice
of Arbitrator shall be as follows: each party to choose one with the third choice
by mutual agreement or, if unable to agree, chosen by a Superior Court Judge.
Rules of arbitration: American Arbitration Association
Page 3
L. HOLD HARMLESS
The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City, its officers, employees, agents
and representative harmless from any and all claims, demands and actions
based upon or arising out of errors, omissions or acts of negligence of the
Consultant or its associates, employees, or sub -consultants while performing
service under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that the Consultant's
general liability insurance policies defend, or shall be endorsed to defend, the
City from claims of bodily injury and/or property damage arising out of any acts of
negligence of the Consultant or its associates, employees, sub -contractors or
other agents while performing services under this Agreement.
The parties waive their immunity under Title 51 RCW solely for the purpose of
this agreement. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties and
shall survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.
CO
r-
CITY OF RENTON
Signature
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Printed Name and Title Printed Name and Title
MIG, Inc.
Business Name
412 NW 13th Avenue
Mailing Address
Portland OR 97209
city State Zip
503-297-1005
Telephone
Attest
Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
Printed Name and Title
Page 4
City of Renton
Long -Range Parks, Recreation & Trails Plan Update
Scope of Work
Task 1: Existing Conditions and Synthesis of Recent Planning
The MIG Team will review planning documents and identify key issues and questions to prepare for the
kickoff meeting with city staff. In addition, MIG will work with the City to help select members of a
Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) that represents a wide range of recreation interests in the Renton
community. This committee will work directly with MIG and the City staff on a regular basis. (Given
the abbreviated nature of this effort, it may make sense for the Board of Park Commissioners to act as
the advisory committee, or perhaps the Park Board with a select few additional members.) MIG will
then attend Staff Meeting #1 to identify staff s desired plan outcomes and format and brainstorm about
potential recommendations, strategies, and policies. PAC Meeting #1 will include a discussion of the
role of the PAC, desired plan outcomes and priorities, and review existing documentation. Following
these meetings, MIG will develop an outline for the Park, Recreation, and Trails Plan. After City review
and comment, MIG will synthesize the extensive documentation from previous planning efforts into
initial draft chapters for the current plan update, including analysis of the planning area, existing parks,
and facilities.
Estimated budget for task:
Professional fees: $9,790
Direct Costs: $ 270
Task 1 Total: $10,060
Task 2: Recreation Survey
MIG proposes a self-administered random household survey distributed to selected households in the
community. Completed in the prescribed manner, an accurate sampling of opinions and participation
levels can be made. We propose a sample size of 400 responses, which will give us a 95% confidence
level. The MIG project manager will meet with city staff to develop a survey that directly addresses the
city's priorities. Some of the information that can be expected to be collected is:
■ Population profile information
■ Attitudes and opinions related to services
■ Park and facility needs
■ Information on current recreation participation compared to the MIG AVERAGE,
which is the average participation levels for the last 15 communities surveyed.
■ Analysis by geographical areas of the community
■ Measure of support for funding facilities and programs
■ Perceived need for specialized facilities such as sport fields, indoor recreation space
and aquatic facilities
These results can be directly compared to those from Renton's 1991 survey, which was conducted by JC
Draggoo & Associates. MIG maintains data from earlier Draggoo surveys and uses a similar format for
new surveys, allowing comparisons with earlier local surveys and those in other communities.
Draft — Scope of Work City of Renton Long -Range Parks, Recreation & Trails Plan
Estimated budget for task:
Professional fees: $8,855
Direct Costs: $7,700
Task 2 Total: $16,555
Task 3: Recreation Needs Assessment
Based on information derived from the survey, previous planning documents, input from City staff, and
mathematical models previously developed by MIG, the MIG Team will develop demand standards
specific to Renton. These standards will be expressed in terms of a ratio of acres or facilities per 1,000
people. The recommended standard (Level of Service) will then be used to compare with the existing
supply to identify existing and future needs in terms of acres, miles or number of facilities. The Needs
Report will include:
■ A discussion on national recreation trends
■ A comparison of land/facilities with other cities
■ Results of the survey
■ Input data from public workshop meeting
■ Input from special interest groups
■ A collection of the raw survey tables
■ A description of how each demand model was developed and what it means in terms of additional
land or facilities.
The MIG project manager will meet with city staff and the PAC to review the survey results and needs
assessment prior to drafting this chapter of the plan update.
Estimated budget for task:
Professional fees: $4,685
Direct Costs: $ 220
Task 3 Total: $4,905
Task 4: Recommendations and Policies
MIG will prepare draft recommendations and policies for the Renton Park, Recreation and Trails Plan,
including:
■ Design and development standards for each type of park, trail system or open space area proposed in
the city's park system
■ A park and facility plan that describes the general location of future park sites, trail systems, open
space areas and other facilities
■ Needs for major new facilities such as an indoor recreation center, sports field complex, aquatic
complex or other specialized facilities
■ Goals and Objectives in compliance with IAC guidelines
■ A recreational trail plan for the community including development standards
Draft — Scope of Work City of Renton Long -Range Parks, Recreation & Trails Plan
■ Recommended changes, additions or improvements needed to existing parks
Recommendations in program areas, maintenance and operations, and overall management of leisure
services
The MIG project manager will meet with city staff and the PAC to review recommendations and
policies and obtain comments prior to developing the action plan.
Estimated budget for task:
Professional fees: $4,225
Direct Costs: $ 270
Task 4 Total: $4,495
Task S: Action Plan
Based on the above efforts, MIG will prepare a list of capital projects, identify funding options and a
strategy, and develop a capital improvement plan. Also as part of this effort, MIG will identify
maintenance requirements and park operations impacts of proposed facilities.
Estimated budget for task:
Professional fees: $2,925
Direct Costs: $ 0
Task 5 Total: $2,925
Task 6: Adoption and Documentation
MIG will prepare a draft of the Park, Recreation and Trails Plan and send one copy to the City for
reproduction and distribution. After review by City staff, MIG will revise the draft, complete the SEPA
review checklist, and present it for review to the Board of Park Commissioners and City Council.
Making revisions based on input from the City staff, the PAC, the public meeting and the City Council,
MIG will finalize the Master Plan. Final documents will include one unbound hardcopy of the final plan
and one CD containing an electronic PDF file. The Final Master Plan will include maps and text that
provides the following information:
■ Description of the planning process
■ Summary of the community profile information
■ Assessment of parks and programs offered
■ Park and facility needs assessment
■ Park design standards
■ Recommendations and policies
■ Implementing and funding recommendations
■ One full-sized and one reduced version colored copy of the Existing Parks and Facilities Map and
the Park Layout Plan
Draft -- Scope of Work City of Renton Long -Range Parks, Recreation & Trails Plan
Estimated budget for task:
Professional fees: $10,765
Direct Costs: $ 595
Task 6 Total: $11,360
Total Project Budget by Task:
Task 1:
$10,060
Task 2:
$16,555
Task 3:
$ 4,905
Task 4:
$ 4,495
Task 5:
$ 2,925
Task 6:
$11,360
Project Total:
$50,000
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board..
Economic Development,
October 17, 2005
Neighborhoods, and Strategic
Planning Dept.
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Don Erickson
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing.. X
Subject:
Querin Annexation
- 60% Direct Petition to Annex
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Study Sessions......
Annexation Petition
Certification
Information.........
60% Petition
Recommended Action:
Council concur
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total Project..
91
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The City is now in receipt of the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the proposed 7.18-acre
Querin Annexation. The site abuts the City on its southern and western boundaries. The site is
designated Residential Single Family on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and most
likely would be given R-8 zoning if Council eventually accepts this annexation. Before this can
happen, however, it must decide whether or not it wants to accept the 60% Direct Petition, and
if it does, whether it wants the Administration to forward the Notice of Intent package to the
Boundary Review Board for their 45-day mandatory review. Also, the BRB must approve the
annexation before the Council can further consider it.
State law requires that the Council hold at least two public hearings 30-days apart to consider
future zoning. Tonight's hearing would be the first for this 7.18-acre s ite.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council set November 7, 2005 for a public hearing to decide whether wants to accept the 60%
Direct Petition, and if it does, what future zoning for this annexation site might be.
C:\Documents and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\60% Agenda Bill for 11-07-05.doc
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
U s; NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC
+ PLANNING DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: October 6, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Az�.
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administratorj.
1
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (x6581)
SUBJECT: Proposed Querin Annexation — 60% Petition to Annex and
Future Zoning
ISSUE:
Now that the King County Department of Assessments has certified at least 60% of the
annexation area's assessed value, as represented by signers of the petition to annex,
does the City Council want to accept this petition to annex?
If the Council accepts this petition, does it support future R-8 zoning consistent with the
current Residential Single Family land use designation shown on the Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Map?
If the Council accepts this petition, does it wish to authorize the Administration to
forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for its mandatory
45-day review and evaluation?
RECOMMENDATION:
• Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the 7.18-acre Querin
Annexation, supports future zoning consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan
land use designation, and authorizes the Administration to forward the Notice of
Intent package to the Boundary Review Board with the understanding that it could
invoke jurisdiction to expand this annexation to include properties to the north and
east, south of SR-900.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The City received the 10 % Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition for this
revised annexation June 8, 2005, and after having the signatures certified by King
h:\ednsp\paa\annexations\querin\60% issue paper.doc
Terri Briere
Page 2 of 3
October 6, 2005
County, held a public meeting with the applicants on August 1, 2005, to consider
whether to accept it, modify it or reject it. At that time, Council decided to accept the
10% Notice of Intent petition and authorized circulation of a 60% Petition to Annex.
The latter was subject to property owners accepting future zoning consistent with the
City's Comprehensive Plan and agreeing to accept a proportionate share of the City's
existing outstanding indebtedness.
On September 6, 2005 the City received the 60% Petition to annex this 7.18-acre area
and, shortly thereafter, forwarded it to the King County Assessor's Office for
certification of signatures. On September 13, 2005, the Assessor's Office certified that
the signatures on the petition were sufficient, under the provisions of RCW 35.13.002,
to equal at least 60% of the area's assessed value.
As noted in the July 7, 2005, issue paper, all responding departments and divisions
noted that the annexation represents a logical extension of their respective
services/systems. The annexation area is within the water service area District 90 by
agreement under the East King County Coordinated Water System Plan. The area
currently is not served by sewer, but Renton is the designated service provider for it.
Fire suppression services are currently provided by Fire District 25 and the King
County Sheriff's Office provides police services. Upon annexation, Renton would take
over both fire suppression and police services. Also, the annexation is located within
the Honey Creek Sub -basin of May Creek where drainage problems exist downstream.
As a result, future development would likely have to meet the Level II standards of the
2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Fiscally, the proposed annexation is estimated to create a surplus for the City of
approximately $9,410 a year in 2005 dollars at full build out in ten or less years. A
one-time parks acquisition and development cost attributable to this annexation would
be $30,194. It is also worth noting that because new development would be built to
City rather than County standards, the City will be obtaining new streets with curbs,
gutters, and street lighting at no cost to it. Also, as noted in the 10% issue paper, the
proposed annexation complies with most relevant City annexation policies as well as
relevant Boundary Review Board objectives.
CONCLUSION:
Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the proposed Querin Direct Petition to Annex has been
certified as having signatures representing at least 60% of the area's assessed value. It
also has reasonable boundaries and appears to comply with relevant Boundary Review
Board objectives, although the area is smaller than most annexations. If the City were
to invoke the Boundary Review Board's jurisdiction, it is possible that they would
expand the boundaries of this annexation north to SR-900.
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Querin\60% Petition and Rezone Issue Paper.doc
Terri Briere
Page 3 of 3
October 6, 2005
Since the annexation site is within Renton's Potential Annexation Area and no
impediments to the provisions of City services have been identified, the proposed
Querin Annexation would appear to be in the City's general interest and welfare.
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Querin\60% Petition and Rezone Issue Paper.doc
- ��1� ` -
`1 {
�+ T� �� 1T - �{ 2 d ! 1
SE 1b4th St,
-
L oQ — -
l
I
- L �
� pI'
d
0
LLJ oney C#eek I
CO -1 5?' I /Ssp
I II jl 9
s -
S��
i --
1 -
-1 C SE 11 t r
( l
00
-
-�
TF St
- - - _ 6 Elf t
- Q
3th St
- o -- --_l _-- -u - — --
1
-
_1
---
11 1-
r3t-�
J
- -- Ca -- -
E 6th S ev -- — — — Th. dowment is o graphic repr—t.tion no, guwmNed
to ay acwracy, tended !or city pu as of
ly and
- based the beat forrnotion o-il f the dote shown.
�— — This mop is for display purposes only.
Querin II Annexation I goo 1600
Figure 1: Vicinity Map MOMMUM
1 : 9600
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — Renton City Limits
♦/ ♦ Alex Pietsch, Administrator
G. Del Rosario Proposed Annexation Area
4 May 2005
11
-, X
_ \
f.
IIII ~ \\
l�
37 3E 48 X I x f, . x . <,-' 2' / " -
- X ., I� 13C 6E J ,
<n
\..
-
� 1\
139 55 - - - 33tB.92 122
139 49 X . 9.27 X _. x 13413 \ '.\ \X t
91
.7 v X1351E
1117 _ 35 E7
10 4
\ X, _
X 1.7
r\
.1141
<7 69 X \
x'
7ox
x 1,0.18 X \ \
140.59
ICJ 1t .e3 140.85
v x X
42.
X ,0.42 T
X \\ \ \ \
,4292 „X256
X 2 ,
X'4 \
i0 142.63 '113.26
�../ ta3. 9 x 1 \ \\ \ I
X / x1 2 e xt 23 11 \ \. \ \`�
38+ X t43. t 315 ` x 112.8b \ .\
x
143.46 \ + -
X
\ x \
1 c3.5a 14J.41 143. 5 14
X
X \`
14 .27 1♦2.60 141.52
v143.52 143. +\
X x i <4.61 X X X 143.78
X 4 .8fi 14%.60 1� ; V 1 �� � _ � ,25,86
145 8 ✓ \, \
i{<.96 X
i
% 41 59 "1. 2
X
a3.66
'45.36 tu,1E t4_ 3.6C 7 x 1<C.29 This dooumMt (e a graphic reCCresMla tlon, not guoruntesd
X X / to y «curocy, tended fsr clfy pu Qoxe ly and
-�-J toaed on the Dent intonnation awilabl 5 of the dote shorn.
14532 I 1 Ths map is for disploy purposes Mly.
Querin II Annexation
�gure 2: Topography Map
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
♦ Alex Pietsch, Administrator
J� G. Del Rosario
�t�NTO$ 4 May 2005
0 200 400
1 : 2400
1 m Interval Countour
- - Renton City Limits
CO Proposed Annexation Area
O�
Ea
❑ 0Q3
4 ❑ C❑ d
o
SE 1
0
❑ ❑❑
F1
❑ ❑
--q]
UL
Oep This document h a ip dedrfor tbatlan, not x-e ed
to sur �y accuracy, y purposes y
based the beri information owilobla ae o1 the date shown.
--- This mop is for display purposes only.
Querin II Annexation 0 200 400
Figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 2400
Gti�Y 0,{ Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Existing Structure
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
G. Del Rosario — — Renton City Limits
��oNzo$ 4 May 2005 O Proposed Annexation Area
-7
o �
\
\
\\
O
(7�
I F
This document fa a g^aphic rIVVresenla"on, nol quwonteed
to aur�y xcuracy, tended fer city pu ue see only and
based the beat informolion awilable of the date shown.
This mop is fw display purposes only.
Querin II Annexation
'igure 4: Sensitive Areas Map
Gti�Y os Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning
J` Alex Pietsch, Administrator
J` G. Del Rosario
4 May 2005
0 200 400
High Erosion 1 : 2400
Hazard Boundary
Wetland Boundary — — Renton City Limits
® > 40% Slope O Proposed Annexation Area
M
xfKI
r 'r
s
kr
A '. g41
j•
24,
k
F
k
i
_
I5
Thfa document to a 9f:,h< re7reaentation, not guaranteed
to rvey xcuracY, tended for dty W Qoxs ly and
Daaed on the Dea< inf-tion awilaDle a of the date shown.
Thia map is for display purpoen only.
Querin II Annexation 0 200 400
Figure 5: Aerial Map
1 : 2400
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning — — Renton City Limits
! Alex Pietsch, Administrator Proposed Annexation Boundary
G. Del Rosario
��NT�$ 4 May 2005
QUERIN ANNEXATION FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
Coss
.................
.................
Units
Population
AV
Existing dev.
3
7
$987,000
Full dev.
46
106
$17,200,000
Assumptions: 2.2 persons / household
$400,000 AV / new unit
$325,000 AV /existing unit
Existing
Full
Rate
Regular levy
$3,099
$54,008
3.14
Excesslevy
$78
$1,352
0.07861
State sharPrl revern yes
Rate(per cap)
Existing
Full
Liquor tax
$3.52
$24.64
$373.12
Liquor Board profits
$5.04
$35.28
$534.24
Fuel tax - roads
$14.46
$101.22
$1,532.76
Fuel tax - arterials
$6.47
$45.29
$685.82
MVET
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Camper excise
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Criminal justice
$0.36
$2.52
$38.16
Total
$208.95
$3,164.10
Misr.Pllanenus revenues
Rate
Existing
Full
Real estate excise'
$48.57
$339.99
$5,148.42
Utility tax"
$133.20
$399.60
$6,127.20
Fines & forfeits'
$17.53
$122.71
$1,858.18
Total
$862.30
$13,133.80
Per capita
" Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate
Per capita
Existing
Full
Contracted Services
Alcohol
$0.19
$1.33
$20.14
Public Defender
$4.68
$32.76
$496.08
Jail
$8.56
$59.92
$907.36
Subtotal
$94.01
$1,423.58
Court/legal/admin.
$66.92
$468.44
$7,093.52
Parks maintenance'
$14.90
$104.30
$1,579.40
Police
$276.89
$1,938.23
$29,350.34
Road maintenance"
N/A
$0.00
$1,301
Fire"'
$1.25
$1,233.75
$21,500.00
Total
$3,838.73
$62,247.84
'See Sheet Parks FIA
" See Sheet Roads FIA
"' Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract)
One=firrie �o ts>'Parks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA):
Other one-time costs:
Total revenues
Existing $48QZ 4
Full $7fi59J
Total ongoing costs
Existing !'$3$3$<33
....................
....................
Net fiscal impact
Existing s $4092
Full a9A115
....................
....................
Total one-time costs:i$2228:.0>2
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
King County
Department of Assessments
King County Administration Bldg.
500 Fourth Avenue, Room 708
Seattle, WA 98104-2384
(206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595
Email: assessor.info@metrokc.gov
www.metrokc.gov/assessor/
Scott Noble
Assessor
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted September 7, 2005
to the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson,
Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to
Renton of the properties described as the Querin Annexation, has
been examined, the property taxpayers, tax parcel numbers, and
assessed value of properties listed thereon carefully compared with
the King County tax roll records, and as a result of such examination,
found to be sufficient under the provisions of the New Section of
Revised Code of Washington, Section 35.13.002.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 13thday of September, 2005
Scott Noble, King C unty Assessor
CITY OF RENTOt4
PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON
UNDER RCW 35A.14.120 SEE 0 6 2005
(60% Petition—QuerinAnnexation) RECEIVED
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
TO: THE CITY COUNCIL Of SUBMITTED BY: 6ww - I .
THE CITY OF RENTON ADDRESS: / 2 A16 44-!Y,
1055 South Grady Way a,
Renton, WA 98055 PHONE: 0-7/
The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (60%) in value according to the
assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton.
We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of
RCW 35A.14,120 et seq.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to
the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit A) and legal description (Exhibit B) are included as part of
this petition.
In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation
proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW
35A.14.120 on August 1, 2005. The City Council then determined that the City would accept the
proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners agree
to:
(1) Accept the City's simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations for the
subject property consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
designations as they effect the subject property; and
(2) Assume their proportional share of the City's outstanding bonded
indebtedness,
all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of
such meeting.
WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask:
(a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such
proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted,
specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all
persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their
approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and
(b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the
Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the
above described territory to become part of the City of Renton,
Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in
force, and to receive City public services.
Page 1 of 2
Querin Annexation
This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking
the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and
may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures.
WARNING: Everyperson who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real
estate.)
1. �HAgo "V A)WkY/
a0 n
2. � lay k�
�3in if.6 Q�
l81:v NE fi Lo
5.
6.
7.
9.
10.
Page 2 of 2
Exhibit A
�I� i ICI
L�
a
o
Z -
0
�.a„t�
eon y rn: t to optmw'a"o t°ne'e
- tn� may � t« duWoy wmuses «ay.,
Querin II Annexation o 200 400
Figure 3: Existing Structure Map
1 : 2400
*.)
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Existing Structure
Alex l Rosh, Administrator
c. nee Rosario —Renton City Limits
a May 2005 C J Proposed Annexation Area
Exhibit B
QUERIN ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of
Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying
northerly of the south line of the north 165 feet of the south half (1/2) thereof;
LESS the west 30 feet thereof.
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.
Staff Contact......
Subject:
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Al #:
For Agenda of.
EDNSP October 17, 2005
Alex Pietsch (x6592)
Boeing Subdistrict I Conceptual Plan Approval
Exhibits:
Agenda Status
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution ............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Issue Paper Study Sessions......
Proposed Conceptual Plan Information.........
Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban
Center —North
Recommended Action: Approvals:
• Refer the Conceptual Plan to Committee of Legal Dept......... X
the Whole Finance Dept...... X
• Set a public hearing on November 7, 2005 Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTIONS:
The Boeing Company is proposing a Conceptual Plan for a second phase of redevelopment of surplus
property at the Boeing Renton Plant known as Subdistrict 1B. The 2003 Development Agreement
with the Boeing Company requires Council adoption of a Conceptual Plan prior to redevelopment.
This Conceptual Plan will serve as the basis for all future land use approvals related to this
development. A public hearing to consider the proposed plan should be set on November 7, 2005.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the proposed Conceptual Plan with the following conditions:
• Park Avenue be designated as a "pedestrian -oriented street;" and
• That transit facilities (e.g., transit stops, stations, parking, etc.) be allowed within the "ROFO
area" should funding opportunities arise and development of such facilities is supportive of the
surrounding redevelopment and supported by the property owner(s).
RentoH:\EDNSP\Council\Issue Papers -Agenda Bills-Ctte Reports\2005\Bocing 113 Conceptual Plan Agenda Bill 10-10-05.doc
c4a),
ECONOMIC'DEVELOPMENT,
NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC
' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: October 10, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA:Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator (x 6592)
SUBJECT: BOEING SUBDISTRICT 1B CONCEPTUAL PLAN
ISSUE:
The City Council is asked to approve a Conceptual Plan, in accordance with the
December 2003 Development Agreement between the City and The Boeing Company,
for the 50.7-acre portion of the Boeing Renton Plant, known as Subdistrict 113.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council should approve the proposed Conceptual Plan with the following
conditions:
• Park Avenue be designated as a "pedestrian -oriented street;" and
• That transit facilities (e.g., transit stops, stations, parking, etc.) be allowed within
the "ROFO area" should funding opportunities arise and development of such
facilities is supportive of the surrounding redevelopment and supported by the
property owner(s).
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
2003 Boeing Development Agreement and Conceptual Planning
In 2003, the City of Renton worked with The Boeing Company to change its land use
policies and regulations to bring about the potential surplus and sale of portions of its
Renton Plant for redevelopment. In addition to a significant Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, creation of two new zoning designations (Urban Center North 1 and Urban
Center North 2), and expanded design guidelines, Boeing and the City established a
Development Agreement establishing the public and private responsibilities necessary to
bring about successful redevelopment. One of the key provisions of the Development
Agreement was Conceptual Planning.
h:\ednsp\council\issue papers -agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing I b concept plan 10-10-05.doc
Boeing Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual Plan
Page 2 of 6
October 10, 2005
In order to give the City some assurance and comfort about when and how properties
would be made surplus and redeveloped in the future, the Development Agreement
requires that Boeing plan and the City Council approve, in a conceptual way, three large
"subdistricts" that make up the Renton Plant "at the time at which the Owner wishes to
subdivide, develop, sell, or otherwise alter any property within the subdistricts for uses
not related to airplane manufacturing or supporting uses."
The Development Agreement included a Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict 1 A and it was
approved by adoption of the Development Agreement. This is the property that was
purchased by Harvest Partners. However, while another development group, Center Oak,
was considering purchase of the property, it presented and the Council adopted a slight
revision to the Subdistrict IA Conceptual Plan in October 2004. Harvest Partners
continues to plan its redevelopment of this property consistent with the amended
Conceptual Plan.
Now, The Boeing Company seeks to subdivide and sell a portion of Subdistrict 1B and
has presented the attached Conceptual Plan for the Council's consideration.
Requirements of a Conceptual Plan
Per the 2003 Development Agreement, a proposed Conceptual Plan will include:
• A narrative describing the conceptual redevelopment proposal and its relationship
to the Renton's Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for the Urban Center —
North;
• The estimated timing and sequencing of property surplus and sale (if applicable);
• A description of the proposed uses, including the general mix of types, estimated
square footage of each building and parking for each structure, heights and
residential densities;
• The general description of use concentrations (i.e., residential neighborhoods,
office or retail cores, etc.);
• Vehicular and pedestrian circulation that includes a hierarchy and general location
of type, including arterials, pedestrian -oriented streets, other local roads and
pedestrian pathways;
• General location and size of public open space; and
• An economic benefit analysis demonstrating the conceptual development's
anticipated economic impact to local, regional and state governments.
The Development Agreement states "the Council will base its approval on the proposed
Conceptual Plan's fulfillment of the adopted Comprehensive Plan Vision and Policies for
the Urban Center —North. Once adopted, the City will use the Conceptual Plan to
evaluate all subsequent development permit applications within the subdistricts based on
consistency.
Proposed Subdistrict 113 Conceptual Plan
The attached Conceptual Plan proposal outlines Boeing's plans for the redevelopment of
the property south of N. 81h St. and east of Logan Ave. N. It divides the property into two
distinct parts: the northerly 21.2 acres that is currently under a "right of first offer"
h:\ednsp\council\issue papers -agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing I concept plan 10-10-05.doc
Boeing Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual Plan
Page 3 of 6
October 10, 2005
(ROFO) agreement with Harvest Partners and will likely be sold in the very near future,
and the southern portion of the Subdistrict, which contains 660,000 square feet of
existing office buildings with re -use potential and 12.85 acres of remaining land available
for in -fill redevelopment.
The Conceptual Plan describes redevelopment of the ROFO property as complementary
of the urban retail development currently being planned by Harvest Partners to the north.
It includes the possibility of as much as 270,000 square feet of retail, with one large -
format (big -box) retailer on the eastern side of the property. Small and medium-sized
shops would also be developed on either side of Park Avenue. The plan also shows
pedestrian connections between the remaining properties to the south, through the retail
development and to Park Ave. This plan is consistent with the thoughts Harvest Partners
has expressed to date regarding development of this property. And, all indications are
that the company will exercise their right of first offer and purchase this property.
The economic benefit analysis in the plan suggests that redevelopment of the ROFO
property would create 1,061 direct and indirect new jobs, predominately retail -oriented,
annual tax revenues to Renton of $856,000 beginning in 2008, and $667,000 in one-time
revenue to the City during construction.
Boeing indicates that, for the most part, the ROFO area is the only property that is
available for redevelopment in the near future. The timing of surplus of the remaining
property is longer term —five to 10 years, perhaps. However, this property has
significant potential to house high -paying jobs in the future in both the re -used existing
buildings and in new office and lab buildings. In fact, the Conceptual Plan describes
capacity of the remaining properties of as much as 900,000 square feet of new lab space
in addition to the existing 660,000 square feet of office buildings. If the in -fill properties
were developed as more traditional offices, the potential square footage reduces to
540,000 square feet.
A 4.9-acre property in the southwest corner of the subdistrict may be available for
redevelopment more quickly. This property is the site of the 10-71 building, a 144,000-
square foot laboratory facility. The City has worked with Boeing and potential users to
explore the possible re -use of this facility for life sciences research or, possibly even
manufacturing. The Conceptual Plan includes the possibility that this building may be re-
used. It also allows multi -family or retail development to occur, if a user for the existing
building cannot be found in a timely manner.
Additionally, the Plan includes the possibility that the southeast corner of the property,
described as DP-3, could be developed as retail to support the emerging job center in the
area.
If the property was redeveloped to the full potential outlined in the Plan, the economic
benefit analysis shows that more than 2,100 direct and indirect new jobs would be created
by full redevelopment. One-time revenues to the City would top $6.2 million and new
recurring revenues to Renton would nearly reach $2.3 million.
h:\ednsp\council\issue papers -agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing I concept plan 10-10-05.doc
Boeing Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual Plan
Page 4 of 6
October 10, 2005
The Vision and Policies of the Urban Center —North
Renton's Vision for redevelopment of the Urban Center — North, as described in the
Comprehensive Plan, is one of dramatic change as existing low-rise industrial and mid -
rise office buildings are reconfigured into a dynamic new retail and office neighborhood.
This vision would be supported by the proposed plan for the ROFO area. The Vision
states, "Two initial patterns of development are anticipated within the District: one,
creating a destination retail shopping district; and the other, resulting in a more diverse
mixed -use, urban scale office, and technical center with supporting commercial retail
uses." The conceptual plan for the ROFO area, in conjunction with Harvest Partners'
plan for the area north of N. 8th St., meets the first part of this vision. The plan for the
remaining area to the south meets the second part of the Vision.
Also, part of the Vision for the Urban Center - North is "a dense employment center."
Although the end users are unknown at the present time, the concept of combining new
structures and re -utilizing high -quality existing structures will meet the vision of job
growth occurring in "high -quality, well -designed flex -tech development and low- to mid -
rise office, lab, and research and development buildings... with ground -related retail."
The Purpose Statement for the Urban Center — North envisions redevelopment at a
larger scale than found in Downtown Renton with a wider range of uses, taking
advantage of the greater size of available land holdings. These uses are anticipated to
include some industrial -type uses as ongoing within the larger context of
commercial/retail, office, and residential.
The building heights proposed by the conceptual plan would be consistent with both the
existing buildings to remain and Policy LU-265: "Support more urban intensity of
development (e.g. building height, [etc.]) than with land uses in the suburban areas of the
City..."
The combination of large -format retail development with medium -format retailers and
smaller, specialty retail shops along Park Avenue meets the intent of Policy LU-301:
"Ensure that big -box [large -format] retail functions as an anchor to larger, cohesive,
urban -scale retail developments."
The conceptual plan has a pedestrian orientation within the site, with connections to the
perimeter along N 6th St. and Park Ave. This concept is consistent with Policy LU-303:
"Encourage pedestrian -oriented development..."
The eventual proposed parking ratio of 3.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet is consistent with
Policy LU-311: "Reduce the suburban character of development, preserve opportunities
for infill development, and provide for efficient use of land by setting maximum parking
standards."
h:\ednsp\council\issue papers -agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing I concept plan 10-10-05.doc
130e19g Subdistrict 113 Uonc ptual Plan
Page 5 of 6
October 10, 2005
Possible Conditions of Plan Approval
While the proposed Conceptual Plan is consistent with the Vision and Policies of the
Urban Center- North, staff asks the City Council to consider approving the plan with
two conditions.
First, given the fact that Boeing proposes pedestrian connections through the property to
Park Avenue, making it the main pedestrian access to the retail/entertainment
development expected to develop in Subdistrict 1 A to the north, and the large number of
office/lab workers that will one day be in the area when the existing office buildings are
re -occupied and in -fill development occurs, staff believes that Park Avenue should have a
strong pedestrian orientation. The Urban Center Design Guidelines provide enhanced
streetscape and urban design requirements on streets specifically designated as
"pedestrian oriented." Staff proposes that Park Avenue between N. 81h and N. 6th Streets
be designated as a "Pedestrian -Oriented Street" in the Conceptual Plan approval. This is
consistent with the Vision: "Initial development may be characterized by ... a strong
pedestrian -oriented spine along Park Avenue" and Policy LU-300: "Encourage the
placement of buildings for retail tenants along pedestrian -oriented streets to create urban
configurations."
Additionally, staff proposes preserving the possibility of siting a transit facility in the
ROFO area. As the City Council is aware, the City, the State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT), and Sound Transit have been planning a HOV Direct Access
Interchange on Interstate 405 at N. 8th Street. Additionally, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) is
being planned as a high -capacity transit strategy, linking Renton to Bellevue and other
locations on the Eastside. Current plans for BRT, have busses exiting the freeway at N.
8th and landing in the redevelopment area, before traveling south along Logan Avenue to
the Downtown Transit Center. If the City, State, and Sound Transit can outline a plan
and funding for development of a transit facility, that may include passenger load/unload
areas, structured parking, etc, that is supportive of redevelopment and supported by the
property owners, the Conceptual Plan should allow such a facility to be developed. This
is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Objective NN: "Implement Renton's Urban
Center consistent with the `Urban Centers criteria of the [King County] Countywide
Planning Policies to create an area of concentrated employment and housing with direct
service by high capacity transit..." and Policy LU: "Renton's Urban Center should be
maintained and redeveloped with supporting land use decisions and projects that...
support development of an extensive transportation system to reduce dependency on
automobiles..."
CONCLUSION:
The Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict I is generally consistent with the Vision and
Policies established in the Comprehensive Plan for the Urban Center ----North and should
be supported with the following conditions:
1) Park Avenue be designated a "Pedestrian -Oriented Street," and
c:\documents and settings\mpetersen\local settings\temp\boeing I concept plan 10-10-05.doc
Boeing Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual Plan
Page 6 of 6
October 10, 2005
2) Transit facilities would also be an allowed within the "ROFO area," should funding
opportunities arise and development of such facilities is supportive of the surrounding
redevelopment and supported by the property owner(s).
Approval of this Conceptual Plan will form the basis for all land use approvals going
forward, unless the Plan is amended with City Council approval.
Attachments: Urban Center— North Vision, Objectives, and Policies
Proposed Conceptual Plan
cc: Jay Covington — AJLS Chief Administrative Officer
Gregg Zimmerman — PBPW Administrator
Neil Watts — Development Services Director
Ben Wolters — EDNSP Director
Jennifer Henning — Development Services Principal Planner
Nancy Weil — Development Services Senior Planner
h:\ednsp\council\issue papers -agenda bills-ctte reports\2005\boeing lb concept plan 10-10-05.doc
� �
g
� » �
�
\
/ w3~
� �~
�°\-.,�
tom,\ �¥a�.�2\»2�6
%•m
. � .. �,
�_&., .
-
. !. -• �
- � a�
� �
' � -
. ,
��.
w
#�
THE BOEING COMPANY
CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
SUB -DISTRICT 1-13
Submitted to the City of Renton
October 3, 2005
CONCEPTUAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
Sub -District 1-B
Renton, Washington
Background
The Boeing Company has been working with the City of Renton since early 2003 to
evaluate potential redevelopment strategies associated with its 737 facility in Renton,
Washington (the "Renton Plant Site"). In December 2003, The Boeing Company and
The City of Renton entered into a Development Agreement that established certain roles
and responsibilities for the potential phased redevelopment of all or a portion of the
Renton Plant Site, including:
■ Renton commitments to fund and construct certain public infrastructure
improvements;
■ Boeing commitments to fund certain private aspects of redevelopment; and
■ Boeing commitments to complete Conceptual Plans when it elects to subdivide,
develop, sell, or otherwise alter any property for uses not related to airplane
manufacturing.
Per the terms of the Development Agreement, Conceptual Planning was anticipated to
occur incrementally, and would be completed for three discrete areas of the Site, known
as Sub -Districts 1-A and 1-B, and District 2 (see Exhibit 1). City Council approved
Boeing's Conceptual Plan for Sub -District 1-A in December 2003 and amended it in
October 2004. Boeing subsequently sold this portion of the Site to Harvest Partners in
December 2004.
Harvest Partners is currently refining its development plan for Sub -District 1-A, which is
also sometimes referred to as both Lots 1 — 4 and Lakeshore Landing. Harvest Partners'
preliminary planning anticipates the development of an urban retail center containing
approximately 800,000 square feet of retail, with the potential for additional hotel, office
space and multifamily residential units. Construction of the retail project is anticipated to
begin in 2006.
Sub -District 1-B
Sub -District 1-13 is located immediately to the south of Lakeshore Landing, as illustrated
on Exhibit 2, and totals approximately 50.7 acres, net of that portion which has been
reserved for the extension of a four -lane 8`h Avenue between Logan and Park Avenues.
As is outlined within the 2003 Development Agreement, the construction of two new
lanes along this segment of 81h is necessary to support the redevelopment of Sub -District
1-B (see Exhibit 3).
Page 1 of 9
October 3, 2005
The City of Renton is currently completing its design for this segment of 81h Avenue, and
expects to begin building at least the two northern -most lanes in March, 2006,
simultaneous with the other infrastructure improvements necessary to support the
redevelopment of Sub -District 1-A. Ultimately, two additional lanes (to the south) along
this same segment of 81h will be required to support the redevelopment of District 2.
Harvest Partners has a Right of First Offer to purchase a portion of the Sub -District
which totals approximately 21.2 acres (see Exhibit 3). Harvest Partners has indicated
their interest in developing this portion, known as the ROFO area, with retail uses that are
complementary with the proposed development of Sub -District 1-A as an urban retail
center. The development intent of the ROFO area as depicted with this Conceptual
Redevelopment Plan is based upon feedback from Harvest Partners as to their proposed
project and from The City of Renton as to their goals for redevelopment within the Urban
Center North.
The remainder of Sub -District 1-B contains approximately 29.5 acres and is described
herein as the "Boeing Remainder", as illustrated on Exhibit 2. Portions of the Boeing
Remainder are currently improved with office buildings that Boeing owns and will
continue to utilize as part of on -going airplane manufacturing plant operations.
Interspersed between these existing office buildings are approximately 12.85 acres of the
Boeing Remainder that have been identified as potential development parcels ("DP 1"
through "DP 4") within this Conceptual Plan.
Submittal
Included within this submittal are a narrative description of Boeing's proposal for Sub -
District 1-B, a Conceptual Planning Diagram, and two economic benefit analyses
demonstrating a range of potential one-time and recurring revenues generated by:
(1) Development illustrated within the Planning Diagram on the ROFO portion of the
Sub -District (beginning in 2007); and
(2) Development illustrated within the Planning Diagram on the Boeing Remainder
(beginning in 2007 for DP 1 and in 2016 for DP 2 — DP 4).
Boeing seeks the City's approval of this Conceptual Plan so that it can complete a
Binding Site Plan creating additional lots, and finalize negotiations with Harvest Partners
related to the acquisition of the ROFO portions of the Sub -District. The timing of a land
surplus decision by Boeing or redevelopment associated with the majority of the Boeing
Remainder (with the exception of DP 1) is not currently envisioned to occur sooner than 5
to 10 years in the future.
Page 2 of 9
October 3, 2005
September 26, 2005
FULLER SEARS
ARCHITECTS
CONCEPTUAL PLAN
SUB -DISTRICT 1-13 �-BOE/NG
Im
0
0
MF
z
z
w
a
'w
'
DP-1
z
0
MF
F_
nDP-1
MAX 110 UNITS
PER ACRE
MULTI -FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
(535 UNITS)
NOTE:
MAX. 30'h LOT
COVERAGE IF 1-STORY
RETAIL (65,000 SF)
LEGEND:
R RETAIL
L LAB
O OFFICE
P PARKING GARAGE
M F MULTI -FAMILY
NORTH 8TH STREET
MAX. 30% LOT COVERAGE
IF 1-STORY RETAIL
(270,000 SF)
I Illm m m
EXIST DATA ,
HUB '
i
m FF,
rolp
VO
STREET
DP-2
PP-3 J
MAX. TWO
MAX. ONE
6-STORY
6-STORY
LAB BLDGS.
LAB BLDG.
(360,000 SF
(180,000 SF)
TOTAL)
W/SHARED
PARKING IN DP-2
NOTE`
GARAGE
MAX. ONE
6-STORY BLDG.
NOTE:
IFOFFICE
MAX, ONE
(120,000 SF)
6-STORY BLDG.
IF OFFICE
(120,000 SF)
WITH NEW
PARKING GARAGE
111
OD x
Q
6 0
r z
w
z
w
DP-3 Y
Q
a
,VO
DP-4 J
MAX. TWO
6-STORY
LAB B
(360,000 SF
TOTAL)
SUPPORTED BY
EXIST PARKING
GARAGE
NOTE:
MAX. TWO
6-STORY BLDGS,
NOFFICE
0'000 SF)
WITH NEW 2-3 STORY
PARKING GARAGE
(E)
R
EXISTING
GARAGE
VO
D P-4
VO
NOT
A
PAR
`tills)(
EXISTINC
GARAGE
NOT
A
PART
u
D
I
_
u
D
PEDESTRIAN
CONNECTIONS
Conceptual Development Plan
The Conceptual Plan for Sub -District 1-B is comprised of two somewhat distinct parts.
The ROFO area makes up the northern portion of the property along 8thAvenue, has been
identified as surplus by Boeing operations, and is available for near -term redevelopment.
The Boeing Remainder makes up the southern portion of the Sub -District, and contains
660,000 square feet of existing office space with re -use potential and approximately
12.85 acres of land with future redevelopment potential.
ROFO Area
Boeing recognizes that high -quality retail development is essential to the successful
transition of the area from its industrial roots to the City's vision for the Urban Center -
North. Harvest Partners and the City are both committed to ensuring that the
development at Lakeshore Landing is well -designed and initiates redevelopment of a
quality and at a scale which is consistent with the City's long-term vision for the area.
As planning for Lakeshore Landing has progressed, the land south of 81h has been
identified as an important component of the overall project. The area, known as the
ROFO portion of Sub -District 1-B, has been illustrated within this Conceptual Plan as an
integral part of the retail development planned to the North.
The ROFO portion of the Sub -District is envisioned to contain a large format
"destination" retailer located along Logan Avenue, with supporting retail shops space
concentrated along both sides of Park Avenue. Generally, the large format retail
development (users with footprints of 50,000 square feet or larger, and building heights
up to 45 feet) is planned to occur along 81h and Logan, facing eastward toward Park
Avenue. The supporting retail shops space would include a mixture of medium format
retailers (ranging between 10,000 and 50,000 square feet in area, with building heights up
to 40 feet) and some component of smaller, specialty retail shops overlooking Park
Avenue.
The Plan anticipates pedestrian connections to occur internally within the site both east
toward Park Avenue, and south toward 6th Avenue. Vehicle access would occur off of
Park Avenue, with loading and delivery functions relying upon Garden Avenue and an
internal service road running along the southern edge of the ROFO property line.
At a maximum lot coverage ratio of 30%, the ROFO site could accommodate up to
270,000 square feet of retail space. Harvest's current planning anticipates a total of
225,000 to 230,000 square feet, comprised of a 135,000 — 140,000 square -foot large
format retailer located along Logan, and 85,000 to 90,000 square -feet of shops space.
Parking is located in well -organized surface parking lots, with primary pedestrian
entrances facing inward or directed toward Park Avenue.
A small portion of the site, containing a data hub for the Boeing Plant, needs to be
retained by Boeing for the foreseeable future. It can be accommodated along the
Page 5 of 9
October 3, 2005
southern portion of a mid -block parking field without having a negative impact on the
surrounding retail uses.
Summary
Redevelopment of the ROFO parcel as envisioned within this Conceptual Plan meets
many of the City's vision and policy statements for the Urban Center -North, which call
for "retail integrated into pedestrian -oriented shopping districts." This site is located
within District 1, where the City identifies its first objective as follows:
"Create a major commercial/retail district developed with uses that add significantly to
Renton's retail tax base, provide additional employment opportunities within the City,
attract businesses that serve a broad market area and act as a gathering place within the
community."
Boeing Remainder
This portion of the plan is significantly influenced by the presence of four, 1980s-vintage
office buildings that are located throughout (the 10-13, 10-16, 10-18 and 10-20
buildings). Each structure is 5 — 6 stories in height, ranging between 160,000 and
170,000 square feet. Parking is accommodated in separate, structured garages and in
surrounding surface lots, at an overall ratio of 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet. Boeing
currently utilizes these four buildings and anticipates no near -term changes that would
result in significant rehab or sale of the structures.
In addition to the existing office buildings, there is also a 1960s-vintage lab building,
known as the 10-71 building, located along Logan Avenue. Although the condition of
the building and the planned widening of Logan Avenue may impact its potential re -use,
Boeing and the City are interested in exploring viable adaptive re -use opportunities. To
illustrate the potential capacity for redevelopment within the Conceptual Plan, the 10-71
building has been assumed to be demolished, creating a 4.9-acre development parcel
between Logan Avenue and the 10-20 building (DP 1). However, Boeing would like to
retain the flexibility of considering either re -use of the existing structure or
redevelopment in the future.
We have assumed that the existing office buildings remain, but could be supported in the
future by parking at a market -driven ratio of 3.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet, rather than at
Boeing's more conservative rate. As a result, surplus parking stalls exist within the three
existing parking garages, and three additional development parcels are created: a 3.9-acre
site between the 10-18 and 10-20 buildings (DP2); a 1. 8-acre site on the west side of Park
Avenue north of 6th (DP3); and, a 2.2-acre site on the west side of Garden Avenue north
of 61h (DP4).
Page 6 of 9
October 3, 2005
DPI
This 4.9-acre parcel is located along Logan Avenue, immediately south of the ROFO
property. Fronting on 61h Avenue, it is also adjacent to the 10-20 office building and
associated parking structure. Given its location and near -term redevelopment potential,
the Plan envisions its redevelopment as either a mid -rise, multifamily project or,
potentially, a retail development ancillary to that anticipated on the ROFO piece. If,
instead, the existing building were re -used, it is envisioned that it would be of interest
either as a cost-effective research and development or contract manufacturing facility.
With the demolition of the existing structure, the DP-1 site could support a significant
multi -family project, either incorporated in one or more stories above ground -floor
retailers, or developed at higher densities as a single use project. A five- to six -story
residential project, developed at densities of 110 units per acre, would be both consistent
with the residential development currently planned at Lakeshore Landing and compatible
with the surrounding uses. At this higher density, approximately 535 units could be sited
on DP
Alternately, redevelopment of the DP I parcel could accommodate up to 65,000 square
feet of retail space at a 30% lot coverage ratio, taking the form of additional medium -
format and small, specialty shops space backing up against Logan. Although access
would most likely occur off of 6thAvenue, the development of DP 1 could be integrated
with the larger retail development occurring on the ROFO parcel.
DP2 and DP4
These two parcels are both infill opportunities that exist when parking requirements for
the existing office buildings are reduced. Currently underutilized and serving for the
most part as overflow parking areas for Boeing employees, the Plan envisions their
redevelopment with 6-story office or lab buildings, consistent with the current
development pattern.
In some instances where new lab development is planned, surplus parking within existing
garages could fully support new development, and allow for the creation of new, private
open spaces or campus greens within the neighborhood. In order to create this surplus
parking opportunity, the Plan assumes either that the four existing Boeing office
buildings are sold to other users with market -based parking requirements or that Boeing
provides new parking areas on the Plant to accommodate its employees.
The Conceptual Plan illustrates the potential redevelopment of each of these parcels with
laboratory uses, resulting in approximately 720,000 square feet of new space in four
separate structures. Both DP2 and DP4 could accommodate two, 6-story structures
containing 180,000 square feet each. A new 2- to 3-story parking garage would be
constructed between the new buildings on DP2, and the additional parking needs would
be provided by ear -marking a portion of the stalls within the 10-20 parking garage. On
Page 7 of 9
October 3, 2005
DP4, sufficient surplus parking exists within the existing 10-18 parking garage that no
new parking would need to be constructed in this location.
Alternately, either DP2 or DP4 could also be redeveloped with new office uses. Given
the greater parking requirement for office space (3.5/1,000) when compared to lab space
(1/1,000), less development is able to be accommodated on the parcels. On DP2, a
single, 6-story structure would be developed, containing 120,000 square feet. New
structured parking would be developed behind. On DP4, approximately 300,000 square
feet could be constructed in two, 6-story buildings, with all parking still provided within
the existing 10-18 building garage.
h
This parcel is located just south of the 10-18 office building, at the corner of Oh and Park
Avenues. The Plan envisions the development of this parcel with new lab or office uses,
in both cases housed within a single 6-story structure. If developed as lab space, the
building could contain approximately 180,000 square feet, supported by dedicated
parking stalls within a new, multi-user garage constructed on DP2. If developed as office
space, a building of approximately 120,000 square feet could be constructed on site, with
parking either provided in a new garage on DP3 or accommodated by providing
additional parking levels within a DP2 garage.
Alternately, the DP3 parcel could accommodate up to 24,000 square feet of neighborhood
retail space, fronting on Park Avenue and offering amenities to the surrounding workers
and residents. Although no redevelopment of the land on the other side of Park Avenue
is envisioned as part of this Conceptual Plan, redevelopment of DP3 could also lead to
other improvements along Park Avenue at key intersections. It is envisioned that, if
developed with retail uses, DP3 would begin to meet the increased demands for amenities
and services that redevelopment along the 61h Avenue corridor would require.
Summary
Redevelopment as illustrated within this Conceptual Plan would be consistent with the
City's Urban Center -North vision and long-range planning policies, creating a vibrant,
mixed -use corridor on the north side of 61h Avenue and along Park, with mid -rise
buildings fronting the streets and structured parking behind. If new development took the
form of multi -family and laboratory space, the corridor would contain a total 535 new
multi -family units and 900,000 square feet of new lab space at full build -out. This new
mix of uses would be at a scale consistent with the 660,000 square feet of existing office
space already located in the corridor.
Page 8 of 9
October 3, 2005
Economic Benefit Analysis Summary
Boeing's Conceptual Redevelopment Plan for Sub -District 1-B seeks to both allow for
the near -term redevelopment of Boeing's underutilized assets while advocating for a mix
of uses that significantly improves the City's tax and employment base. Two economic
benefit analyses (Exhibit 4) have been completed to support this submittal, demonstrating
the potential one-time and recurring revenues generated by:
(1) Development illustrated within the Planning Diagram on the ROFO portion of the
Sub -District (beginning in 2007); and
(2) Development illustrated within the Planning Diagram on the Boeing Remainder
(beginning in 2007 for DP 1 and in 2016 for DP 2 — DP 4).
The economic benefits to the City of Renton associated with the redevelopment of the
ROFO portion of the site can be summarized as follows:
■ By 2008 (project stabilization), it is estimated that over 1,061 jobs would be
created in the City of Renton alone; of this job total, 859 direct jobs would be
located within the development and 202 would be indirect City jobs;
■ The City is estimated to gain one-time revenues of nearly $667,000 during
redevelopment of the parcels;
■ The City is also forecast to receive an increase in recurring annual tax revenues of
nearly $856,000, beginning in 2008.
The economic benefits to the City of Renton associated with the redevelopment of the
Boeing Remainder portion of the site (DP 1 — 4) can be summarized as follows:
By 2013 (project stabilization), it is estimated that over 2,100 jobs would be
created in the City of Renton alone if this portion were developed with
multifamily and lab uses as illustrated on the Conceptual Plan; of this job total,
1,700 direct jobs would be located within new buildings and 400 would be
indirect City jobs;
■ Under this same set of land use assumptions, the City is estimated to gain one-
time revenues of more than $6.2 million during redevelopment of the parcels;
■ The City is also forecast to receive an increase in recurring annual tax revenues of
nearly $2.3 million, beginning in 2013.
Page 9 of 9
October 3, 2005
L
am
Renton —Sub District 1 B
Phase I=�'�`�_
r
ROFO
1 .Y
t
21 acres
St
41*1.
Boeing Remainder f ��`
x
dvIt
rPZ' r
Sub
District�a
I B
\ O
ti
ira Mir r.r �
UPI M• � 1 K
1
J
O � O
.r�r.
s
I
i
i
D
H
e LEc3�N4
RNAIAY COVSRut�rT :n
%
T [OrSW.CRpr 't
•. �R; +e
noluvr corm to rJ
pp�pR; YTRW 2
OA Av+ca'r gwp-
Li RUrAMY SEC'�'T' iSA.w
i
NOTES
I AM IS
I
• r. ■ f = —'. _ _ _..f TY� _ ___.- iM AVM01 f,� lSgj. `WL X 1N W.iitOnl-�I yi4wr I
AK.vE. Vt 9 . m WCum N M-A *11 Lri4 rhea i!O
/LAN VIEW GLLGAdi'Sw (di !HLR 4 / Lo l xCR'ti >Db JR*EN +a'AB,rPc�Y
PROPOSED ARTERIAL RIGHTS OF WAY
TO SUPPORT DISTRICT 2
(FULL BUILDOUT) EXHIBIT
ECONOMIC BENEFIT STUDY
HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PARCELS
BOEING SUB DISTRICT 1-B PROPERTY
RENTON, WASHINGTON
I. PURPOSE
Boeing Realty Corporation (BRC) is seeking to estimate the community economic
benefits of redeveloping certain Sub District 1-B property under option by Harvest
Partners at its Renton, Washington facility into additional retail land uses. This
"right of first option" (ROFO) property is the Phase II expansion of Harvest
Partners' development underway on Boeing's Renton Sub District 1B property
The ROFO Phase II land area being considered for redevelopment as retail space
by Harvest Partners is comprised of 21.20 net acres. It is only a portion of the
50.70 gross acres that comprises Boeing's entire Sub District 1-B Renton property.
The specific purpose of this document is to show City of Renton the economic
benefits derived from Harvest Partners redeveloping this target ROFO property if
fully developed as follows:
Retail —Shop Space 91,000
Retail —Big Box 135,000
Total 226,000 Sq. Ft.
The analysis presents an estimate of economic benefits if Harvest Partners excises
their option to purchase the targeted Renton Boeing parcels. The benefits are
measured by comparing the full redevelopment of this property as retail uses
between 2006 and 2008 versus no action. Economic impacts have been measured
(one-time and recurring) in terms of
➢ Jobs
➢ Income
➢ Property values
➢ Public revenues
State of Washington
King County
City of Renton
Page 1
Deleted: 9/23/2005
II. LIMITATIONS
The economic benefit findings of redeveloping Harvest Partners ROFO parcels
into retail space are only as valid as the underlying assumptions.' These
assumptions reflect reasonable approximations of actual economic experience in
the marketplace. The economic benefit model developed for this assignment
reflects these assumptions. It is the culmination of a series of computer -based
sensitivity analyses.
III. OVERALL ECONOMIC BENEFIT FINDINGS
Redevelopment of the Harvest Partners ROFO portion of the Boeing Renton Sub
District 113 property into retail uses will result in positive economic impacts for
the City of Renton, King County and the State of Washington. The text, charts
and tables that follow summarize economic findings by comparing job, income
and property value differences by year 2008 between "redevelopment" of the
Harvest Partners ROFO parcels versus "no use" scenarios. A summary of key
findings follow:
➢ By 2008 (project stabilization), an estimated 1,667 jobs would be created if
the target 21.20 acres comprising Harvests Partners ROFO parcels in Sub
District 1-B are fully redeveloped and absorbed into shop space and big box
retail uses.2
➢ Of this job total, an estimated 859 direct jobs would be created in the
redeveloped buildings and 808 indirect jobs would be created by 2008.
➢ These jobs would generate an additional $ 80 million in recurring annual
income at full occupancy in 2008.
➢ Of this income total, nearly $45 million in direct income would be created
on the redeveloped Sub District I-B ROFO parcels and over $35 million in
indirect income would be created in 2008 and thereafter.
➢ The corresponding increase in property values for the Harvest Partners
ROFO parcels is forecast at nearly $53 million by 2008.
1 Although not guaranteed, the economic benefit estimates expressed in this document are intended to
reflect information from sources deemed to be authoritative and reliable. All monetaryfigures are
expressed in 2005 dollars.
2 This job total includes both direct and indirect jobs. Indirect jobs is the measure of secondary job creation
resulting (induced) from expenditures associated with direct job creation.
DeWted: 9/23/2005
"' Page 2
➢ The increase in recurring annual tax revenues by 2008 to the State of
Washington is estimated at nearly $5.1 million. This is in addition to
nearly $3.8 million in one-time state revenues collected during
redevelopment and absorption of the additional retail space on the Harvest
Partners ROFO parcels.
IV. RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFIT FINDINGS
The economic benefits to the City of Renton of Harvest Partners redeveloping this
excess Boeing property in Sub District 1-B are now summarized:
➢ By 2008, it is estimated that over 1,061 jobs would be created in the City of
Renton alone from redeveloping these Harvest Partners ROFO parcels in
Sub District 1-B. Of this job total, an estimated 859 direct jobs would be
created in the redeveloped buildings and 202 indirect City jobs would be
created by 2008.
➢ The City of Renton is estimated to gain one-time revenues of nearly
$667,000 during redevelopment of the Harvest Partners ROFO Sub District
1-B parcels.
➢ The City is also forecast to receive an increase in recurring annual tax
revenues of nearly $856,000 in 2008 and thereafter upon full build -out and
absorption of the new retail space.
Table 1 summarizes these estimated benefits to the City in terms of new jobs,
income and municipal revenues. These data reflect one-time benefits during
development as well as estimates of annually recurring economic benefits. For
example, during the assumed 2006 through 2008 development period, accrued
City tax revenues are estimated to generate over $66,000 during land development
and over $601,000 during construction of the retail shop and big box space.
Sources for these municipal revenues are sales tax and real estate transfer taxes.
Once the retail space is completed and absorbed (2008 estimate), annually
recurring tax revenues are projected at nearly $856,000. Nearly $187,000 of this
total will result from the City of Renton's share of property taxes. Annual sales
taxes generated from the retail space is estimated to exceed $584,000. The City's
employee head tax is forecast to generate over $58,000 each year and real estate
transfer taxes are estimated at over $26,000 annually.
Deleted: 9/23/2005
-' In :200Page 3
Table 1
CITY OF RENTON ECONONIIC BENEFITS
HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PARCELS
HARVEST PARTNERS SUB DISTRICT 1-B
One-time Land One-time Building Recurring
Redevelopment Scenario I Development I Develo ment 2006-2007 in 2008
CITY JOBS
Direct Jobs
42
92
859
Indirect Jobs
16
39
202
Total Jobs
58
131
1,061
ANNUAL INCOME
Direct Income
$
2,121,030
$ 9,432,720
$ 44,657,600
Indirect Income
$
678,445
$ 3,384,707
$ 8,889,439
Total Income
$
2,799,475
$ 12,817,427
$ 53,547,039
CITY TAX REVENUES
Property Tax
$ 186,873
Sales Tax
$
66 379
$ 295,201
$ 584,225
Employee Head Tax
$ 58,346
Real Estate Transfer Tax
$ 306,257
$ 26,325
Total Tax Revenues
$ 601,458
$ 855,769
Chart 1 shows that 1,061 permanent jobs are estimated to be created within the
City of Renton. Of these, 859 would be direct on -site jobs in the City of Renton,
resulting in an estimated 202 additional indirect off -site jobs in the City. This
assumes that one quarter of the indirect jobs created occur within the City of
Renton. This compares to no such jobs without the redevelopment of the Harvest
Partners ROFO property in Boeing's Renton Sub District 1-B area.
Chart 1
City of Renton Permanent Jobs Created In 2008
1,200
,
800
400
With Project Without Project
Deleted: 9/23/2005
-; j n Page 4
Chart 2 illustrates that these jobs will generate new annual income within the City
of Renton estimated at nearly $54 million. This corresponding income reflects
both indirect off -site as well as direct on -site income creation in 2008 and
thereafter.
Chart 2
New Job Annual Income in 2008
$60
$54
S-
i With Project Without Project
Chart 3 shows the increases in City of Renton property values of redeveloping the
Harvest Partners ROFO parcels in Sub -District 1-13. After redevelopment
completion in 2008, the assessed value of these parcels is estimated to increase
from $8.6 million to nearly $61.3 million —an increase of $52.7 million.
Chart 3
PROPERTY VALUE INCREASES BY 2008
REDEVELOPMENT OF HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO
PROPERTY
I
Without Project $8.6
i
With Project $61.3
$0 $25 $50 $75
Dollars in millions
Deleted: 9/23/2005
. Page 5
Chart 4 shows that the City of Renton will accrue one-time tax revenues from
sales and real estate transfer taxes of nearly $668,000 during the estimated 2006 _
through 2007 development period. In addition, the City is forecast to increasingly
receive annually recurring tax revenues from redevelopment of the Harvest
Partners ROFO portion of Boeing's Renton Sub District 1-B property starting in
2007. This will increase until 2008 where it peaks at nearly $856,000 as an
ongoing annual cash flow to the City.
Chart 4
New City Of Renton Tax Revenues
$1,000,000
rA
$800,000
c
d
a$600,000 ■ Recurring
� $400,000
■ Onetime
41
$200,000
$ I ti
-
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Deleted: 9/23/2005
._.... _.....
Page 6
ECONOMIC BENEFIT STUDY
SUB DISTRICT 1-11 BOEING DEVELOPMENT PARCELS
RENTON, WASHINGTON
I. PURPOSE
Boeing Realty Corporation (BRC) is seeking to estimate the community economic
benefits of redeveloping four parcels in Boeing Sub District 1-B at its Renton,
Washington facility into a new mix of lab and multi -family land uses. The land
area of these redevelopment parcels comprises 12.85 net acres. It is only a portion
of the 50.70 gross acres comprising Boeing's Sub District 1-B Renton property.
The proposed new land use mix for these four Boeing redevelopment parcels
resulted from an evaluation of the holding capacity of these excess properties and
from market potential considerations.
The specific purpose of this document is to show City of Renton economic
benefits derived from redeveloping these four targeted Boeing Renton parcels if
fully developed as follows:
Lab 900,000
Multi -Family 535,500
Total 1, 435,500 Sq. Ft.
The analysis presents an estimate of economic benefits if the targeted Renton
Boeing parcels are entirely redeveloped and absorbed between 2008 and 2013
versus no action. Economic impacts have been measured (one-time and recurring)
in terms of :
➢ Jobs
➢ Income
➢ Property values
➢ Public revenues
State of Washington
King County
City of Renton
II. LIMITATIONS
The economic benefit findings of redeveloping the four Boeing Renton parcels
comprising 12.85 net acres into modern lab and multi -family space are only as
Deleted: 9/23/2005
- - - Page 1
valid as underlying assumptions.' These assumptions reflect reasonable
approximations of actual economic experience in the marketplace. The economic
benefit model developed for this assignment reflects these assumptions and is the
culmination of a series of computer -based sensitivity analyses.
III. OVERALL ECONOMIC BENEFIT FINDINGS
Redevelopment of the four Boeing Renton parcels into the proposed uses will
result in positive economic impacts for the City of Renton, King County and the
State of Washington. The text, charts and tables that follow summarize economic
findings by comparing job, income and property value differences by year 2013
between "redevelopment" of the four Boeing parcels versus "no use" scenarios.
A summary of key findings follow:
➢ By 2013 (project stabilization), an estimated 3,300 jobs would be created if
the target 12.85 acres comprising four Boeing parcels in Sub District 1-B
are fully redeveloped and absorbed into lab and multi -family uses.2
➢ Of this job total, an estimated 1,700 direct jobs would be created in the
redeveloped lab buildings and 1,600 indirect jobs would be created by
2013.
➢ These lab jobs would generate an additional $ 158 million in recurring
annual income at full occupancy in 2013.
➢ Of this income total, over $88 million in direct income would be created on
the redeveloped Sub District 1-B parcels and over $70 million in indirect
income would be created in 2013 and thereafter.
➢ The corresponding increase in property values for the four target Renton
redevelopment parcels is forecast at over $550 million by 2013.
➢ The increase in recurring annual tax revenues by 2013 to the State of
Washington is estimated at over $3.6 million. This is in addition to over
$33.5 million in one-time state revenues collected during redevelopment
and absorption of new lab and multi -family space on the four Boeing
parcels at the Renton Sub District 1-B site.
' Although not guaranteed, the economic benefit estimates expressed in this document are intended to
reflect information from sources deemed to be authoritative and reliable. All monetary figures are
expressed in 2005 dollars.
2 This job total includes both direct and indirect jobs. Indirect jobs is the measure of secondary job creation
resulting (induced) from expenditures associated with direct job creation.
Deleted: 9/23l2005
1 1). 2(,: Lei;, , Page
IV. RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFIT FINDINGS
The economic benefits to the City of Renton of redeveloping Boeing's four parcels
of excess property in Sub District 1-B are now summarized.
➢ By 2013, it is estimated that over 2,100 jobs would be created in the City of
Renton alone from redeveloping these four Boeing parcels in Sub District
1-B. Of this job total, an estimated 1,700 direct jobs would be created in
the new lab buildings and 400 indirect jobs in the City would be created by
2013.
➢ The City of Renton is estimated to gain one-time tax revenues of over $6.2
million during redevelopment of the four Boeing Sub District 1-B parcels.
➢ The City is also forecast to receive an increase in recurring annual tax
revenues of over $2.3 million in 2013 and thereafter upon full build -out and
absorption of the new lab and multi -family space.
Table I summarizes these estimated benefits to the City in terms of new jobs,
income and municipal revenues. These data reflect one-time benefits during
development as well as estimates of annually recurring economic benefits. For
example, during the assumed 2008 through 2012 development period, accrued
City tax revenues are estimated to generate over $40,000 during land development
and over $6,168,000 during construction of lab buildings and multi -family
structures. Sources for these one-time municipal revenues are sales tax and real
estate transfer taxes.
Once the lab and multi -family buildings are completed and absorbed (2013
estimate), annually recurring tax revenues are projected at over $2,343,000.
Nearly $1,953,000 of this total will result from the City of Renton's share of
property taxes. The City's employee head tax is forecast to generate over
$115,000 each year and real estate transfer taxes are estimated at over $275,000
annually.
Deleted: 9/23/2005
Page 3
Table 1
CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFITS
BOEING SUB DISTRICT 1-B DEVELOPMENT PARCELS
Redevelopment Scenario
One-time Land
I Development
One-time Building
I Development 2008-2012
Recurring
in 2013
CITY JOBS
Direct Jobs
25
381
1,700
Indirect Jobs
9
159
400
Total Jobs
34
540
2,100
ANNUAL INCOME
Direct income
$ 1,285,625
$ 49,960,680
$ 123,146,400
Indirect Income
$ 411,248
$ 34,962,754
$ 17,596,700
Total Income
$ 1,696,873
$ 84,923,434
$ 140,743,100
CITY TAX REVENUES
Property Tax
$ 1,952,593
Sales Tax
$ 40,234
$ 3,049,318
$ -
Employee Head Tax
$ 115,496
Real Estate Transfer Tax
$ 3,118,965
$ 275,071
Total Tax Revenues
$ 40,234
$ 6,168,283
$ 2,343,I60
Chart 1 shows that 2,100 permanent jobs are estimated to be created within the
City of Renton. Of these, 3j 7 0 would be direct on -site lab jobs in the City of
Renton, resulting in an esti ted 400 additional indirect off -site jobs in the City.
This assumes that one quarter of the indirect jobs created occur within the City of
Renton. This compares to no such jobs without the redevelopment of the four
Boeing Sub District 1-B parcels.
Chart 1
City of Renton Permanent Jobs Created In 2013
3,000
2,100
2,000
1,000
With Project Without Project
I Deleted: 9/23/2005
', '- 2(jo5. Page 4
Chart 2 illustrates that these jobs will generate new annual income within the City
of Renton estimated at nearly $141 million. This corresponding income reflects
both indirect off -site as well as direct on -site income creation in 2013 and
thereafter.
Chart 2
New Job Annual Income in 2013
$150
41
A
$100
- —
O
r..
0
I e
$50
--
With Project
Without Project
Chart 3 shows the increases in City of Renton property values of redeveloping the
four Boeing parcels in Sub -District 1-B. After redevelopment completion in 2013,
the assessed value of these parcels is estimated to increase from under $74 million
to nearly $624 million —an increase of $550 million.
Chart 3
PROPERTY VALUE INCREASES BY 2013
BOEING SUBDISTRICT 1-13 DEVELOPMENT PARCELS
Without Project I . 1 $73.7
With Project $623.8
$0 $200 $400 $600
Dollars in millions
Meted: 9/23/2005
{ _ Page 5
Chart 4 shows that the City of Renton will accrue one-time tax revenues from
sales and real estate transfer taxes of over $6,208,000 during the estimated 2008
through 2012 development period. In addition, the City is forecast to increasingly
receive annually recurring tax revenues from redevelopment of the four Sub
District 1-B parcels starting in.2009. This will increase each year until 2013
where it peaks at over $2,343,000 million as an annual flow into the City.
Chart 4
New City Of Renton Tax Revenues
$3,000,000
y
$2,000,000
■ Recurring
■ Onetime
$1,000,000
U
S-
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Deleted: 9/23/2005
v- 20 2w Page 6
Table 1
CITY OF RENTON ECONOMIC BENEFITS
FOUR BOEING DEVELOPMENT PARCELS
BOEING RENTON SUB DISTRICT 1-B PROPERTY
One-time Land One-time Building Recurring
Redevelopment Scenario I Development I Development 2008-2012 1 in 2013
CITY JOBS
Direct Jobs
Indirect Jobs
Total Jobs
ANNUAL INCOME
Direct Income
Indirect Income
Total Income
CITY TAX REVENUES
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Employee Head Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
Total Tax Revenues
25
381
1,700
9
159
400
34
540
2,100
$
1,285,625
$
49,960,680
$
123,146,400
$
411,248
$
34,962,754
$
17,596,700
$
1,696,873
$
84,923,434
$
140,743,100
$
1,952,593
$
40,234
$
3,049,318
$
-
$
115,496
$
3,118,965
$
275,071
$
40,234
$
6,168,283
$
2,343,160
HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PARCELS
BOEING RENTON SUB DISTRICT 1-B PROPERTY
One-time Land One-time Building Recurring
Redevelopment Scenario I Development I Development 2006-2007 1 in 2008
CITY JOBS
Direct Jobs
Indirect Jobs
Total Jobs
ANNUAL INCOME
Direct Income
Indirect Income
Total Income
CITY TAX REVENUES
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Employee Head Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
Total Tax Revenues
42
92
859
16
39
202
58
131
1,061
$
2,121,030
$
9,432,720
$
44657,600
$
678,445
$
3,384,707
$
8:889,439
$
2,799,475
$
12,817,427
$
53,547,039
$
186,873
$
66,379
$
295,201
$
584,225
$
58,346
$
306,257
$
26,325
$
66,379
$
601,458
$
855,769
FINAL —Combined Benefits—RevlP 9/26/2005
The data and calculations presented herein while not guaranteed, have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS
COMBINED ECONOMIC BENEFITS
HARVEST PARTNERS ROFO PARCELS & BOEING DEVELOPMENT PARCELS
BOEING RENTON SUB DISTRICT 1-B PROPERTY
One-time Land One-time Building Recurring
Redevelopment Scenario I Development I Development 2006-2012 1 in 2013
CITY JOBS
Direct Jobs
Indirect Jobs
Total Jobs
ANNUAL INCOME
Direct Income
Indirect Income
Total Income
CITY TAX REVENUES
Property Tax
Sales Tax
Employee Head Tax
Real Estate Transfer Tax
Total Tax Revenues
67
473
2,559
25
198
602
92
671
3,161
$ 3,406,655 $ 59,393,400 $ 167,804,000
$ 1,089,693 $ 38,347,461 $ 26,486,139
$ 4,496,348 $ 97,740,861 S 194,290,139
$ 2,139,466
$ 106,613 $ 3,344,519 $ 584,225
$ 173,842
$ 3,425,222 $ 301,396
$ 106,613 $ 6,769,741 S 3,198,929
FINAL --Combined Benefits--RevlP 9/26/2005
The data and calculations presented herein while not guaranteed, have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS
$4,000,000
y
$3,000,000
v
pG $2,000,000
E4
$1,000,000
■ Recurring
® Onetime
U
$- LW
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
FINAL —Combined Benefits--Rev1P 9/26/2005
The data and calculations presented herein while not guaranteed, have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
COMMITTEE REPORT
November 14, 2005
Boeing Subdistrict 113 Conceptual Plan
(October 17, 2005)
The Committee of the Whole recommends concurrence with the staff recommendation to adopt the
Conceptual Plan proposed by The Boeing Company for the potential redevelopment of 50.7-acres of
Boeing property in the South Lake Washington area known as Subdistrict 1B with the conditions
outlined below. The northern 21.2 acres of the property is expected to become surplus and brought
forward for redevelopment in the immediate future. This property is under a "right of first refusal"
agreement with Harvest Partners, the owner and developer of the 46 acres of property formerly owned
by Boeing immediately adjacent to this property to the north. Boeing proposes that this intial parcel be
developed with as much as 270,000 square feet of retail. The remaining property is expected to be
retained by Boeing for five to 10 years. However, upon redevelopment, as much as 900,000 square feet
of lab and/or office, as well as some additional retail and multi -family housing, could be developed in
and around the 660,000 square feet of existing office buildings, which are anticipated to be sold and re-
occupied by other companies.
To enhance the Plan and its consistency with the Vision and Policies for the Urban Center North
adopted in the Comprehensive Plan, the Committee recommends the following conditions be imposed
on the Conceptual Plan:
1) That Park Avenue be designated a "Pedestrian -oriented Street," to ensure an urban form of
development and provide pedestrian linkages between the subdistrict and the planned
retail/entertainment center expected to be developed to the north, and
2) That a transit facility be an allowed use in the immediately available property, if funding for such a
facility emerged and developed in a way that was supportive of surrounding redevelopment and
supported by the property owner(s).
The envisioned retail and employment center resulting from the redevelopment proposed under the
conditioned Conceptual Plan will have positive economic and social impacts for the City as a whole.
As outlined in the 2003 Development Agreement with The Boeing Company, all subsequent land use
applications related to this property will be checked against this document for consistency prior to
approval.
Terri Briere, Council President
cc: Alex Pietsch
Gregg Zimmerman
Neil Watts
Jennifer Henning
Nancy Weil
CI)ocuments and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\Boeing 113 Conceptual Plan COW Report.doc
91
PUBLIC HEARING
BOEING SUBDISTRICT 1B CONCEPTUAL PLAN
November 7, 2005
In 2003, the City of Renton and The Boeing Company entered into a Development Agreement
whereby changes were made to the City's Comprehensive Plan that allowed rezoning of certain
Boeing Company properties. This rezone allowed a wide range of uses under various scenarios
that anticipated vibrant, mixed -use development throughout and area designated as Renton's
Urban Center -North (UC-N). The UC-N was divided into three Subdistricts. A conceptual plan
for Subdistrict I (between North 8th Street and Lake Washington Drive) was approved as part
of the Development Agreement and amended by the City Council in October 2004. The current
Conceptual Plan submitted for approval applies to Subdistrict 1 B (see reverse).
A conceptual plan must be submitted for each subdistrict prior to subdivision, development, sale,
or other alteration of the property not related to airplane manufacturing or supporting uses. The
owner of Subdistrict 113, The Boeing Company, seeks to subdivide and sell a portion of the
property. Therefore, they have submitted a Conceptual Plan for Subdistrict 113.
The Subdistrict 113 Conceptual Plan should further the Vision of the Comprehensive Plan for the
Urban Center — North. Upon review, staff finds that the Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual Plan is
consistent with the City's Vision for this area, which anticipates that the southern portion of
District 1, between North 6th Street and North 8th Street will be redeveloped into a vibrant,
pedestrian -oriented, mixed -use district. A key feature of the proposed Subdistrict 1 B Conceptual
Plan is the integration of existing and new structures, interlaced with pedestrian circulation
patterns, internal parking areas (both surface and structured), and employment -generating uses.
Staff is recommending that Council approve, with conditions, the Boeing Subdistrict 113
Conceptual Plan in accordance with the December 2003 Development Agreement between the
City of Renton and The Boeing Company for the 50.7-acre portion of the Boeing Renton Plan,
known as Subdistrict 113.
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev. 11-01-04
M CENTERS
Goal: Develop well-balanced attractive, convenient, robust commercial office,
office, and residential development within designated Centers serving the City and
the region.
Discussion: The Centers category of land use includes two areas of the City, the Center
Village in the Highlands and the Urban Center located in the historic downtown and the
employment area north to Lake Washington. The Urban Center includes two sub -areas:
Urban Center- Downtown (220 acres) and the Urban Center -North (310 acres). Together
these two areas are envisioned to evolve into a vibrant city core that provides arts,
entertainment, regional employment opportunities, recreation, and quality urban
residential neighborhoods. The Renton Urban Center is envisioned as the dynamic heart
of a growing regional city. Renton's Urban Center will provide significant capacity for
new housing in order to absorb the city's share of future regional growth. This residential
population will help to balance the City's employment population and thereby meet the
policy directive of a 2:1 ratio of jobs to housing.
The Center Village designation is envisioned as a revitalized residential and commercial
area providing goods and services to the Greater Highlands area. The area could
potentially become a focal point for a larger area, the Coal Creek Corridor, connecting
Renton to Newcastle to Issaquah. While development is envisioned at a smaller scale
than expected in the Urban Center, the Village Center will still focus on urban mixed -use
projects with a pedestrian oriented development pattern.
Objective LU-NM: Encourage a wide range. and combination of uses, developed at
sufficient intensity to maximize efficient use of land, support transit use, and create a
viable district.
Policy LU-193. Promote the innovative site planning. and clustering of Center uses and
discourage the development of strip commercial areas.
Policy LU-194. Phase implementation of development within Centers to support
economically feasible development in the short term but also provide a transition to
achieve new development consistent with long term land use objectives.
Policy LU-1! 5$,,1 .qj ate Center boundaries according to the following criteria:
1) The boundary should coincide with a major change in land use type or intensity-,
2) Boundaries should consider topography and natural features such as ravines, hills,
and significant stands of trees;
3) Boundaries should occur along public rights -of -way including streets or utility
easements, or at rear property lines where justified by the existing land use pattern.
Boundary lines should not be drawn through the interior of parcels; and
4) As a maximum distance, the boundary should be drawn within a walkable distance
from one or two focal points, which may be defined by intersections, transit stops, or
shopping centers.
1X-36
CITY O1: PENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-196. Designate Centers in locations with the following characteristics:
1) A nucleus of existing multi -use development;
2) Potential for redevelopment, or vacant land to encourage significant concentration of
development;
3) Center locations should be located on major transit and transportation routes;
4) Center locations should be served by the City's arterial street system.
Policy LU-197. Change adopted boundaries only in the following circumstances:
1) The original mapping failed to consider a major natural feature or significant land use
that would make implementation of the boundary illogical, or
2) The amount of land within a Center is inadequate to allow development of the range
and intensity of uses envisioned for the Center.
Policy LU-198. Support new office and commercial development that is more intensive
than the older office and commercial development in existing Centers in order to create
more compact and efficient Centers over time.
Policy LU-199. Allow stand-alone residential development of various types and urban
densities in portions of Centers not conducive to commercial development, or in the
Urban Center in districts designated for residential use.
Policy LU-200. Allow residential uses throughout Centers as part of mixed -use
developments. Consider bonus incentives for housing types compatible with commercial
uses or lower density residential that is adjacent to Centers.
Policy LU-201. Include uses that are compatible with each other within mixed -use
developments; for example, office and certain retail uses with residential, office, and
retail.
Policy LU-202. Locate and design commercial uses within a residential mixed -use
development in a manner that preserves privacy and quiet for residents.
Policy LU-203. Modify existing commercial and residential uses that are adjacent to or
within new proposed development to implement the new Center land use vision as much
as possible through alterations in parking lot design, landscape, signage, and site plan as
redevelopment opportunities occur.
Policy LU-204. Consolidate signage for mixed -use development.
Policy LU-20 `'Identify major natural features and support development of new focal
points that define the Center and are visually distinctive.
Policy LU-206. Design focal points to include a combination of public areas such as
parks or plazas, architectural features such as towers, outstanding building design, transit
stops, or outdoor eating areas. These features should be connected to pedestrian
pathways if possible.
Policy LU-207. Evaluate existing intersections of arterial roadways for opportunities to
create focal points.
IX-37
CITY OF ItENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-208. Consolidate access to existing streets and provide internal vehicular
circulation that supports shared access.
Policy LU-209. Locate parking for residential uses in the mixed -use developments to
minimize disruption of pedestrian or auto access to the retail component of the project.
Policy LU-210. Connect residential uses to other uses in the Center through design
features such as pedestrian access, shared parking areas, and common open spaces.
Objective NN: Implement Renton's Urban Center consistent with the "Urban Centers
criteria" of the Countywide Planning Policies (CPP) to create an area of concentrated
employment and housing with direct service by high capacity transit and a wide range of
land uses such as commercial/office/retail, recreation, public facilities, parks and open
space.
Policy LU-211. Renton's Urban Center should be maintained and redeveloped with
supporting land use decisions and projects that accomplish the following objectives:
1) Enhance existing neighborhoods by creating investment. opportunities in quality
urban scale development;
2) Promote housing opportunities close to employment and commercial areas;
3) Support development of an extensive transportation system to reduce dependency on
automobiles;
4) Strive for urban densities that use land more efficiently;
5) Maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services;
6) Reduce costs of and time required for permitting; and
7) Evaluate and mitigate environmental impacts.
Policy LU-212. Establish two sub -areas within Renton's Urban Center.
1) Urban Center -Downtown (UC-D) is Renton's historic commercial district,
surrounded by established residential neighborhoods. The UC-D is located from the
Cedar River south to South 7th Street and between I-405 on the east and Shattuck
Avenue South on the west.
2) Urban Center —North (UC-N) is the area that includes Southport, the Puget Sound
Energy sub -station; and the South Lake Washington redevelopment area. The UC-N
is located generally from Lake Washington on the north, the Cedar River and Renton
Municipal Airport to the west, Sixth Street and Renton Stadium to the south, and
Houser yVay_,to. the. east._
Policy LU-213. Maintain zoning that creates capacity for employment levels of 50
employees per gross acre and residential levels of 15 households per gross acre within the
Urban Center.
Policy LU-214: Support developments that utilize Urban Center levels of capacity.
Where market conditions do not support Urban Center employment and residential levels,
support site planning and/or phasing alternatives that demonstrate how, over time, infill
or redevelopment can meet Urban Center objectives.
Policy LU-215. Site and building design should be pedestrian/people oriented with
provisions for transit and automobiles where appropriate.
IX-38
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-291. Provide a transition in land use with respect to intensity of development
where areas mapped Residential Single Family and Residential Options border Urban
Center - North designations.
Policy LU-292. Create boulevard standards for arterial streets connecting or running
through adjacent residential neighborhoods that address noise, pedestrian sidewalks,
planting areas between vehicular lanes and pedestrian areas, traffic calming techniques,
lighting standards, a landscape planting plan for street trees and other vegetation, and
street. furniture.
Policy LU-293. Support a mix of activities within the Urban Center - North designation
that support populations in adjacent residential areas as well as new development within
the re -development area. Examples of uses that serve the needs of existing populations
include neighborhood -scale retail that addresses the day-to-day needs of residents,
restaurants and coffee houses, public facilities, and places of assembly such as parks and
plazas.
Policies for Public Facilities
Policy LU-294. Evaluate public facility needs for projected new populations within the
Urban Center — North to accommodate a wide range of future users.
Policy LU-295. Support a partnership with community stakeholders such.as the Renton
School District o provide a transition for public properties adjacent to the Urban Center —
North such as the Sartori School and Renton Stadium facilities. Transition of these
facilities could range from accommodating a new clientele as the area transitions to
mixed use activities, or physical re -development of properties addressing the needs of
employees or residents of the Urban Center.
Policy LU-296. Recognize the Renton Municipal Airport as an essential public facility.
(See Section on Airport Compatibility Policies).
Urban Center North Districts
The proposed Urban Center -North is divided into two districts for planning purposes.
Each District has a different emphasis in terms of range, intensity and mix of uses. These
are District One, east of Logan Avenue, and District Two, west of Logan Avenue. The
implementation of planning concepts for District Two will be dependent on decisions by
The Boeing Company regarding continued airplane assembly operations at the Renton
Plant. For this reason;iitiatori"of redevelopment in District Two will likely occur after"'
transition of the area east of Logan Avenue, District One, has begun.
Consolidation of Boeing operations may cause certain property located within District
One to be deemed surplus, making it available for redevelopment within the near future.
District One is envisioned to include a variety of uses. The intensity of these uses would
require substantial infrastructure improvements. More extensive development, ultimately
anticipated with the future development of District Two, will likely require even more
significant infrastructure upgrades.
Redevelopment in both districts of the Urban Center - North will be responsive and
protective of the North Renton residential neighborhood to the south. While the North
IX-46
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev. 11-01-04
Renton neighborhood is not a part of the Urban Center, its residents will benefit from the
significant amenities provided by development of a new urban community.
Redevelopment within both districts will occur in a manner that is not incompatible with
the operations at the Renton Municipal Airport, recognizing that the airport is an essential
public facility located within an urban area. Redevelopment within both districts will be
consistent with the City's Airport Compatible Land Use Program. The program responds
to State requirements to consider how land use in the surrounding areas affects the
Renton airport.
The current supply of underutilized land north of N. 81h Street creates an immediate
redevelopment opportunity for a first phase of development in District One. However,
the industrial character of the surrounding developed properties, both within District Two
to the west and the Employment Area -Industrial area to the east, will make it difficult to
achieve true urban intensities in District One at the beginning of this transition. The
overall Vision for the District contemplates much more than a series of low-rise
structures with large parking lots. Therefore, it is important that this initial development
facilitates later stages of investment as the neighborhood matures and property values
increase. It is also critical that the early -stage vision for District One sets the stage for
high -quality redevelopment in District Two.
The following "visions" have been developed for each District.
Vision - District One
The changes in District One will be dramatic, as surface parking lots and existing large-
scale industrial buildings are replaced by retail, flex tech, and office uses. Initial
development may be characterized by large -format, low-rise buildings surrounding
internal surface parking lots and bordered by a strong pedestrian -oriented spine along
Park Avenue. As the Urban Center -North evolves, the buildings of District One may be
remodeled and/or replaced with taller, higher density structures. Parking structures may
also be built in future phases as infill projects that further the urbanization of the District.
Two initial patterns of development are anticipated within the District: one, creating a
destination retail shopping district; and the other, resulting in a more diverse mixed -use,
urban scale office and technical center with supporting commercial retail uses. It is hoped
that over time these patterns will blend to become a cohesive mixed -use district.
In its first phases of development, District One hosts for the region a new form of retail
center. Absent are the physical constraints of a covered mall. Although parking initially
may be handled in surface lots, their configuration, juxtapose d'with`snmaller building
units, eliminates the expanse of paving that makes other retail shopping areas
unappealing to pedestrians. Building facades, of one or two stories, are positioned
adjacent to sidewalks and landscaped promenades. Destination retail uses that draw from
a sub -regional or regional market blend with small, specialty stores in an integrated
shopping environment to support other businesses in the area. While large -format ("big -
box") retail stores anchor development, they do not stand-alone. Rather, they are
architecturally and functionally connected to the smaller shops and stores in integrated
shopping centers. Cafes with outdoor seating, tree -lined boulevards and small gathering
places invite. shoppers to linger after making their initial purchases. Retail development
Ix-47
CITY OFHENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev. 11-01-04
takes an urban form with high -quality design considering a human scale and pedestrian
orientation.
While retail development will add to the City's tax base and create a modest increase in
employment, the vision for the Urban Center -North is that of a dense employment center.
Within the initial phases of redevelopment, job growth will also occur in high -quality,
well -designed flex/tech development and low- to mid -rise office, lab and research and
development buildings that provide attractive environments for companies offering high -
wage careers in information technology, life sciences and light (clean) manufacturing and
assembly industries.
Redevelopment in this area will also include residential opportunities in low- to mid -rise
buildings with upper -story office and/or ground -related retail. Additional supporting
retail will also be constructed. Logan Avenue is extended and redeveloped for public use
as a major, tree -lined parkway.
During the second generation of redevelopment in District Ones changing property values
and further investment will allow for higher density development in the form of offices
and residences mixed with other uses. As this area is transformed into a mature mixed -
use district, community gathering spaces and recreation facilities to support the City's
neighborhoods and business districts become viable. Cultural facilities, as well as
convention and conference centers may be located within the District and could be
incorporated into mixed -use development with retail, office and hotels. Small parks, open
space, and community gathering places will be incorporated into site design. Facilities
such as multiple -screen theaters and other cultural facilities may add to the amenity value
of the District.
District One Policies
Objective LU-YY: Create a major commercial/retail district developed with uses that
add significantly to Renton's retail tax base, provide additional employment opportunities
within the City, attract businesses that serve a broad market area and act as a gathering
place within the community.
Policy LU-297. Support office and technology -based uses with retail uses and services
along portions of the ground floors to facilitate the creation of an urban and pedestrian
environment.
Policy LU-298. Support uses supporting high-technology industries such as
biotechnology, life sciences, and information technology by providing retail amenities
and services in the area.
Policy.LU-299. Allow for the development of destination retail. centers that are
consistent with a district -wide conceptual plan.
Policy LU-300. Encourage the placement of buildings for retail tenants along pedestrian -
oriented streets to create urban configurations_
Policy LU-301. Ensure that big -box retail function's as an anchor to larger, cohesive,
urban -scale retail developments.
IX-48
CITY OF RENTON LAND USE ELEMENT
Rev. 11-01-04
Policy LU-302. Encourage a variety of architectural treatments and styles to create an
urban environment.
Objective LU-ZZ: Create an urban district initially characterized by high -quality,
compact, low-rise development that can accommodate a range of independent retail,
office, research, or professional companies. Support the continuing investment in and
transition of low-rise development into more intensive, urban forms of development to
support a vital mixed -use district over time.
Policy LU-303. Encourage pedestrian -oriented development through master planning,
building location, and design guidelines.
Policy LU-304. Support urban forms of setback and buffering treatment such as:
a) Street trees with sidewalk grates,
b) Paving and sidewalk extensions or plazas, and
c) Planters and street furniture.
Policy LU-305. Allow phasing plans for developments as part,bf the master plan and site
plan review that:
a) Provide a strategy for future infill or redevelopment with mixed -use buildings.
b) Preserve opportunities for future structured parking and more intense
employment -generating development.
Policy LU-306. Support parking at -grade in surface parking lots only when structured or
under -building parking is not market viable.
Policy LU-307. Support development of parking structures using private/public
partnerships when market will not support structural parking without subsidy.
Policy LU-308. Support surface parking lots behind buildings, and in the center of
blocks, screened from the street by structures with landscape buffers.
Policy LU-309. Consider public/private participation in provision of structured parking,
to stimulate additional private investment and produce a more urban environment.
Policy LU-310. Support shared parking by averaging parking ratios for co -located and
mixed -uses.
_Policy LU-311. Reduce the suburban character of development, preserve opportunities
for infill development, and provide for efficient use of land by setting maximum parking
standards.
Policy LU-312. Support the co -location of uses within a site and/or building in order to
promote urban style mixed -use (commercial/retail/office/residential) development.
Policy LU-313. Discourage ancillary retail pads.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
fvn� I ' 1
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.. City Attorney's office
Staff Contact...... Lawrence J. Warren
Subject:
Amendments to City Code to clarify penalty provisions
Exhibits:
Ordinance
For Agenda of October 17, 2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
X
X
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Adoption on emergency basis Legal Dept......... X
Council concur Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: None
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION: The penalty provisions in City Code Title 4, Chapters 4-2 through 4-7, 4-9
and 4-10; Title 5, Chapter 5-13; and Title 9, Chapters 9-10, 9-13, and 9-15, are amended in this ordinance
in order to clarify the type of penalty indicated for specific City Code violations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the ordinance clarifying penalty provisions in Title 4,
Title 5, and Title 9 on an emergency basis, to be effective immediately.
Redonnet/agnbill/ bh
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
REPEALING SECTION 1-3-2.C.1 OF CHAPTER 3, REMEDIES AND
PENALTIES, OF TITLE I (ADMINISTRATIVE); AND AMENDING
CHAPTERS 4-2 THROUGH 4-7, 4-9, AND 4-10 OF TITLE IV
(DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS); CHAPTER 5-13 OF TITLE V
(FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS); AND CHAPTERS 9-10, 9-
13, AND 9-15 OF TITLE IX (PUBLIC WAYS AND PROPERTY) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY
CLARIFYING THE PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF
CITY CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 1-3-2.C.1 of Chapter 3, Remedies and Penalties, of Title I
(Administrative) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of
Renton, Washington" is hereby repealed.
SECTION Il. Section 4-2-050.A of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. CATEGORIES OF USES ESTABLISHED:
This Section establishes permitted, conditional, accessory and prohibited uses, by zone,
for all properties within the Renton City Limits. All uses in a given zone are one of six (6) types:
PERMITTED USES: Land uses allowed outright within a zone.
CONDITIONAL USES (ADMINISTRATIVE): Land uses which may be permitted
within a zoning district following review by the Development Services Division Director to
ORDINANCE NO.
establish conditions mitigating impacts of the use and to assure compatibility with other uses in
the district.
CONDITIONAL USES (HEARING EXAMINER): Uses with special characteristics that
may not generally be appropriate within a zoning district, but may be permitted subject to review
by the Hearing Examiner to establish conditions to protect public health, safety and welfare.
ACCESSORY USES: Uses customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use
and typically located upon the same lot occupied by the principal use. Some accessory uses are
specifically listed, particularly where a use is only allowed in an accessory form, whereas other
accessory uses are determined by the Development Services Division on a case by case basis per
RMC 4-2-050.C.4 and C.6, Accessory Use Interpretations and Unclassified Uses.
PROHIBITED USES: Any use which is not specifically enumerated or interpreted by the
City as allowable in that district. Any use not specifically listed as a permitted, conditional, or
accessory use is prohibited, except those uses determined to be unclassified and permitted by the
Development Services Division Director pursuant to RMC 4-2-040.C.6. Any prohibited use is
illegal and is a misdemeanor punishable under RMC 1-3-1.
UNCLASSIFIED USE: A use which does not appear in a list of permitted, conditionally
permitted, or accessory uses, but which is interpreted by the Development Services Division
Director as similar to a listed permitted, conditionally permitted or accessory use, and not
otherwise prohibited, pursuant to RMC 4-2-050.C.6, Unclassified Uses.
SECTION III. Section 4-2-140 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-2-140 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 2 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION IV.
Section 4-3-010.D of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
D. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Violation of this Section on Adult Retail and Entertainment Regulations is declared to be
a public nuisance per se, which may be abated by the City by way of civil abatement procedures,
RMC 1-3-3, or Civil Penalties RMC 1-3-2, or both, and not by criminal prosecution.
SECTION V. Section 4-3-090.0 of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
0. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 3 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION VI. Section 4-3-120.13 of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 3 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
3
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION VII. Section 4-4-050.0 of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES:
Any person in violation of this Section shall be informed in writing of the violation and
shall be given fourteen (14) days to comply with this Section. Following this action, if a
subsequent garage sale is conducted in violation of this Section, each day the sale is conducted
shall be considered a separate violation and shall be subject to the following penalty.
Any person conducting any "garage sale" as defined herein in RMC 4-11-070 without
being properly licensed therefore or who shall violate any of the other terms and regulations of
this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION VIII. Section 4-4-060.S of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
S. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 4 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION IX. Section 4-4-100.0 of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
U. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 4 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
11
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION X. Section 4-4-150 of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-4-150 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 4 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XI. Section 4-5-050.D.2 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Violations and Penalties: Section 113 of the International Building Code (relating
to Violations and Penalties) is hereby amended by substituting in its stead the following
language: Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section are misdemeanors subject to
Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XII. Section 4-5-055.13 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. APPLICABILITY:
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter,
repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building
or structure in the City, or cause or permit the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any
of the provisions of this Code. Unless otherwise specified, violations of this Section are
misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
5
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XIII.
Section 4-5-070.C.13 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
13. Notice of Violation — Chapter 1, Section 109.2 of the International Fire Code,
2003 Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows:
109.2 Notice of violation. When the fire code official finds a building, premises, vehicle,
storage facility or outdoor area that is in violation of this code, the fire code official is authorized
to prepare a written notice of violation describing the conditions deemed unsafe and, when
compliance is not immediate, specifying a time for re -inspection. Whenever the Fire Department
has given proper notification of a violation which required reinspection and thirty (30) days have
expired with such condition or violation still in existence, a second re -inspection will be
required. Any re -inspection after the original thirty (30) day period of time shall be done only
upon the payment of a re -inspection fee as specified in RMC 4-1-150, Fire Prevention Fees, to be
assessed against the person owning, operating or occupying the building or premises wherein the
violation exists. This re -inspection fee must be paid within ten days of the notice for the re -
inspection. However, any building owner, operator or occupant, upon a reasonable request to the
Fire Code Official, may obtain an extension of said thirty (30) day period for a reasonable period
to be established by the Fire Code Official to allow such time for compliance. The request for an
extension must be received by the fire department prior to the expiration of the original re -
inspection date.
SECTION XIV. Sections 4-5-070.C.16 and 17 of Chapter 5, Building and
Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260
6
ORDINANCE NO.
entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to
read as follows:
16. Violation Penalties — Chapter 1, Section 109.3 of the International Fire Code 2003
Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 109.3 Violation penalties. Persons who shall violate a provision of this code or
shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair
or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the fire code
official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of this code, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and subject to the penalties of RMC 1-3-1 except for those provisions adopted in
RMC 4-5-070.C.69. Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be
deemed a separate offense.
17. Failure to Comply — Chapter 1, Section 111.4 of the International Fire Code, 2003
Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows:
111.4 Failure to Comply. Any person who shall continue any work after having been
served with a stop work order, except such work as that person is directed to perform to remove
a violation or unsafe condition, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XV. Section 4-5-070.D.20 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
20. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Section 4-5-070.D of Title 4 RMC are
misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC. Each day upon which a violation occurs or
continues constitutes a separate offense.
ORDINANCE NO.
ECTION XVI. Section 4-5-100.0 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
The first paragraph of Section 108.4 of the IFGC, relating to violations and penalties, is
amended by substituting in its stead the following language: Unless otherwise specified,
violations of this section are misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XVII.
Section 4-5-140 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-5-140 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 5 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XVIII. Section 4-6-030.N of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
N. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section are misdemeanors subject to
Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XIX. Section 4-6-070.0 of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
U. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES:
ORDINANCE NO.
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 6 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XX. Section 4-6-110 of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-6-110 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 6 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXI. Section 4-7-250 of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-7-250 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 7 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXII. Section 4-9-040.I of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
I. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXIII. Section 4-9-050.E of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
9
ORDINANCE NO.
E. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXIV. Section 4-9-080.G.2 of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXV. Section 4-9-100.I.3 of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. Violations of this Chapter and Penalties: Notwithstanding the revocation powers
of the Finance and Information Services Director, and unless otherwise specified, violations of
this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXVI. Section 4-9-110.J.2 of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Misdemeanor: In addition to subsection J1 of this Section, any person, firm or
corporation violating any of the provisions of this Section shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a
misdemeanor subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC, and each such person, firm or corporation shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any
violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter is committed, continued or permitted.
10
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XXVII. Section 4-9-150.R of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
R. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXVIII.
Section 4-9-170.E of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
E. VIOLATION OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Construction without Permit Considered Public Nuisance: All street railways, telegraph
lines, telephone lines, electric light lines, gas mains or underground conduits for use of any
public utility company and all rails, ties, planks, posts, wires or other structures, apparatus or
material built, constructed or placed in any street, avenue or alley of the City without a permit
having first been issued therefore in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter shall
constitute a public nuisance and shall be abated in the manner provided by the City law of the
City. Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXIX. Section 4-9-190.P.1 of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
11
ORDINANCE NO.
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXX. Section 4-9-195.F of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
F. Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are
misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXI. Section 4-9-260 of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-9-260 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 9 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXII. Section 4-10-100 of Chapter 10, Legal Nonconforming Structures,
Uses and Lots, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-10-100 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 10 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXIII. Section 5-13-19 of Chapter 13, Public Dances and Dance Halls, of
Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
5-13-19 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
12
ORDINANCE NO.
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 13 of Title 5 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXIV.
Section 9-10-12 of Chapter 10, Street Excavations, of Title
IX (Public Ways and Property) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
9-10-12 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to construct, alter, repair, remove
or improve any facility located on public right-of-way without the required permits or
authorization of the Public Works Director or his duly authorized representative. Unless
otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 10 of Title 9 RMC are misdemeanors subject to
Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXV. Section 9-13-2 of Chapter 13, Trees and Shrubbery, of Title
IX (Public Ways and Property) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
9-13-2 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 13 of Title 9 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXVI. Section 9-15-6 of Chapter 15, Weeds and Noxious Matter,
of Title IX (Public Ways and Property) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
9-15-6 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 15 of Title 9 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
13
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XXXVII. An emergency is hereby declared and this ordinance shall
take effect immediately.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of )2005.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1210:10/12/05:ma
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
14
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works
Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems
Staff Contact...... James Wilhoit, x7319
Subject:
Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. Contract (CAG 03-151) for
King County Portion of the Duvall Avenue NE Widening
Project, Supplemental Agreement No. 3
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Consultant Agreement Supplemental Agreement No.3
Supplemental Agreements No. 1 & 2
2006-2011 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Al k: v
For Agenda of:
October 17, 2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept.........
Risk Management....
1:/
Fiscal Impact: 317.12305.016.5950.11.67.000000
Expenditure Required: $ 682,177 Transfer/Amendment -0-
Total Amount Budgeted: $ 636,768 Revenue Generated $ 682,177
Total Project Budget $4,503,364 City Share Total Project -0- (King County
Reimbursable)
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The proposed supplemental agreement is to modify the existing agreement with Berger/Abam for
design services for the King County portion of the Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project, to redesign
the drainage detention pond and extend the completion date from July 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006.
We are currently in the final phases of right-of-way acquisition and design. The project is projected to
go out for advertisement in the Spring of 2006.
The supplemental agreement is for $85,409 in addition to the initial contract work and two previous
supplements, which makes the total new maximum amount payable $621,228. The supplement is
necessary because the County has indicated that it prefers another location for the drainage detention
pond that would simplify the pond outfall configuration and has other advantages. Additionally, due to
design and coordination issues not evident at the time the agreement was originally executed and delays
in waiting for the County to complete its preliminary design for the pond, it became clear that design
could not be completed by the current completion date of July 31, 2005, and a time extension was
needed. Extending the design agreement will not delay the construction schedule.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 3 with
Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $85,409 to redesign the drainage detention pond
and extend the completion date from July 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006, for design services for
the King County portion of the Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project in unincorporated King
County.
`SY O PLANNING/BUILDING/
'� • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
a� 1
DATE:
M E M O R A N D U M
October 17, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: )�,GreggZimmer.O'Kathy Keolker-Whee Mayor
FROM: maAd inistrator
,
STAFF CONTACT: James Wilhoit, x7319
Transportation Project Manager
SUBJECT: Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. Contract (CAG-03-151) for
King County Portion of the Duvall Avenue NE Widening
Project, Supplemental Agreement No. 3
ISSUE:
Should the City approve Supplemental Agreement No. 3 with Berger/Abam for design
services for the King County portion of the Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project in the
amount of $85,409, to redesign the drainage detention pond and extend the completion
date from July 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006?
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Supplemental Agreement No. 3 with
Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $85,409 to redesign the drainage detention
pond and extend the completion date from July 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006, for
design services for the King County portion of the Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project
in unincorporated King County.
BACKGROUND:
On September 25, 2003, following approval by the Council, contract number CAG-03-
151 was executed with Berger/Abam Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $487,000 for
design services for the King County portion of the Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project.
Design of this project was programmed in the approved TIP for 2003 and 2004 and
construction for 2005-2006. Design and construction of the King County portion of the
Duvall Avenue NE Widening Project is being funded entirely by the County from the
Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
October 10, 2005
Page 2 of 2
TIB and their own funds through reimbursement to the City. The City is administering
this project in conjunction with its own TIB project through an interlocal agreement
between the City and the County (CAG 03-133, dated August 20, 2003).
Subsequently, in the course of planning and design, it was determined that additional
surveying of the project area was needed for the appropriate environmental
documentation and coordination of road alignment with the City of Newcastle.
Supplemental Agreement No. 1 for $46,807 was executed for this purpose on May 27,
2004, increasing the total from $487,000 to $533,807.
It was later determined that an ASTM Standard E 1527-00 Phase 1 ESA investigation
should be conducted on a property parcel known as the Brant property at 9620 Coal
Creek Parkway. The acquisition in its entirety was needed at that time for access to the
City of Renton -owned May Creek Park and for a drainage detention pond. Supplemental
Agreement No. 2 for $2,012 was executed for this purpose on November 23, 2004,
increasing the total from $533,807 to a new total of $535,819, and extending the
completion date from October 31, 2004 to July 31, 2005.
The County subsequently indicated that it preferred another location for the drainage
detention pond on the adjacent Oehrling property (north of the Brant property) because it
would simplify the pond outfall configuration and had other advantages. The County
prepared a preliminary design for the pond at the new location that must now be
completed and incorporated into the overall project design by Berger/Abaco through this
proposed change. The change would be funded entirely by the County, which has
guaranteed funding for the change. Prior to the need arising for this change, the $636,768
TIP amount for Preconstruction Engineering/Administration included a $40,000
contingency, which would have covered this change. However, since this change
exceeds that amount by $45,409, that amount (all funded by the County) must be
increased to $682,177.
Due to design and coordination issues not evident at the time the agreement was
originally executed, coupled with delays in waiting for the County to complete its
preliminary design for the pond, it became clear that design could not be completed by
the current completion date of July 31, 2005, and a time extension is needed. Extending
the design agreement will not delay the construction schedule.
We are currently in the final phases of right-of-way acquisition and design. The project
is projected to go out for advertisement in the Spring of 2006.
Attachment: Berger/Abam Engineers, CAG 03-151 Supplement #3
cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director
Leslie Lahndt, Transportation Design Supervisor
h:\division.s\transpor.tat\admin\agenda 2005\issue paper for duvall ave supplement 3 for kc.doc
Supplemental Agreement No. 3
Contract Number
Organization and Address
CAG-03-151
BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc.
33301 Ninth Avenue South, Suite 300
Federal Way, WA 98003
Project Number
Phone
FAPWT-04-033
206/431-2300
Project Title
New Maximum Amount Payable
Coal Creek Parkway
$621,228
Renton City Limits to SE 951h Way
Description of Work
Supplement No. 3 addresses
the redesign of the stormwater pond to be located on the Oehrhng
property.
See Section IV below.
The Local Agency of City of Renton desires to supplement the agreement entered into with
BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. and executed on 6 August 2003 and identified as Contract
No. CAG-03-151.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows.
Section I, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
The work includes:
STORM DRAINAGE
This work involves preparing a storm drainage plan for the county roadway also known as Coal
Creek Parkway. The 2005 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) and King County
Road Standards shall be used. The work will include the following:
• Design a revised storm drainage system for the project as follows:
i. Calculate required pipe sizes and slopes to convey roadway runoff from from the previous
pond location to the proposed pond location.
ii. Calculate size of jailhouse weir for pond control structure.
iii. Size the pond spillway.
iv. Perform a backwater analysis to confirm that no overtopping of the pond will occur,
including the pond outlet pipe for the 100-year storm event.
V. Size the necessary ditches and channels and design accordingly for conveyance of the
roadway and cut slope runoff.
Supplement No. 3, Pond Redesign BERGER/ABAM, O:A04033
Duvall Avenue NE Project B-1
13 June 2005
vi. Design the water quality and quantity facility for roadway runoff only. If a joint facility to
accommodate both roadway and off -site runoff is required, a separate scope of work and
budget will be negotiated and a Supplement to the Contract will be executed.
vii. Provide geotechnical engineering for pond berms greater than 6 feet in height. See
GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS.
viii. Determine if the proposed stormwater treatment wetland needs a liner based upon
measured/inferred infiltration rates on site. If required, determine if "low permeability" or
"treatment" liner is required.
ix. Provide Level 1 downstream analysis. This work will include a map of the study area,
description of drainage system, field inspections, description of existing, and predicted
drainage issues.
A Surface Water Technical Information Report (TIR) for the drainage analysis will be prepared for
the project's drainage basin contributing to May Creek. The TIR will address the existing conditions
for the on -site, off -site, and downstream effects of the county project.
Included in the TIR will be the following:
• Topographic mapping necessary to determine contributing runoff areas.
• A Drainage Area Map showing contributing areas.
• Review and confirm detention pond volume provided by King County based on King County's
Runoff Time Series.
• Calculate volume required for Stormwater Pond for live storage.
• Calculation of dead storage to determine the required surface area of the treatment wetland.
• Calculate surface area required for Stormwater Wetland.
The Consultant will assemble this material into a Draft TIR. Provide 8 copies of the draft document
to the City for review. Finalize the report based on one round of City and County reviews and
submit 8 copies of the Final TIR to the City.
The stormwater construction documents will include the following:
• Plan and Section views of the pond.
• Detailed section view of the control structure and emergency overflow spillway.
• Details for the energy dissipater and associated splash pad.
• Access road to the pond.
• Fencing with access gate and signage for pond.
• Plan and Profile for pond outlet pipe system on plans at 1"=20' horizontal, 1"=10' vertical scale.
The right-of-way plans will be revised include the following:
• Revise plans to include the Oehrling property as a total take.
• Revise access easement for the new access road to the park parcel, et al.
• Revise the plans to incorporate land exchange between the City of Renton Park property and the
County. Revise the access to this City Park parcel. Coordinate county and city agreements.
The other construction documents will be revised to include the following:
• Clearing limits and restortion on the Oehrling property.
• Planting/landscape plan for the stormwater pond.
• Revised driveway access to the city park parcel, et al.
Supplement No. 3, Pond Redesign BERGER/ABAM, O:A04033
Duvall Avenue NE Project B-2 13 June 2005
This scope provides time for the Consultant to prepare, administer, and coordinate with Widener &
Associates and GeoEngineers, Inc. for environmental review and documentation and geotechnical
investigations, respectively.
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
SEPA Checklist
The Consultant shall provide a revised preliminary draft SEPA Checklist in accordance with
applicable City of Renton regulations and guidelines. As a result of the stormwater pond relocation
by King County, the Checklist shall address the following issues at a minimum: project purpose and
need, alternatives evaluated but rejected, agency coordination, land use, community impacts, right-
of-way acquisition and displacement, economics, pedestrians, bicyclists, air quality, noise, water
quality, wetlands, wildlife, ecologically sensitive areas, sensitive species, cultural resources,
hazardous waste, groundwater, visual quality, energy conservation, and construction impacts. The
level of analysis provided on each issue will vary depending on the level of potential impact.
Discipline studies performed as part of this project and possibly others provided by the City shall be
used to prepare the Checklist. Elements of the environment that are not covered in a discipline
study will be evaluated in a qualitative manner, unless the potential for significant impacts indicates
the need for additional analysis. This task includes compiling the impact analysis sections,
document editing, word processing, graphics, and other production tasks necessary to provide final
copies of all necessary documents.
The following environmental elements will not be affected as a result of the stormwater pond
relocation: project purpose and need,, land use, community impacts, economics, pedestrians,
bicyclists, air quality, noise, hazardous waste, or energy conservation.
The Consultant shall provide eight copies of the revised preliminary draft SEPA Checklist to the
City for review.
The City and County will review the revised preliminary draft SEPA Checklist and provide one
consolidated set of comments to the Consultant.
The Consultant shall address these comments and requested revisions and provide eight copies
of the revised preliminary SEPA Checklist to the City for distribution.
Sensitive Area Studies
Develop special studies, as set forth, in the following section during the final design:
The Consultant shall review available information and perform a site reconnaissance to identify
sensitive areas of wetlands, streams, and erosion hazards. A field investigation shall be conducted to
determine potential impacts to sensitive areas, if any, and what mitigation requirements are
associated with each sensitive area.
The Consultant shall prepare a revised Sensitive Area Analysis Report for the County -selected sotrm
drainage pond design alternative. The analysis should include consideration of potential changes to
applicable regulatory requirements that may occur prior to anticipated permitting and construction
phases. The following potential topics will be addressed, as necessary, because of the new pond
location:
• Wetlands
• Streams
• Erosion hazard areas
• Landslide hazard areas
• Steep slope hazard areas
Supplement No. 3, Pond Redesign BERGER/ABAK O:A04033
Duvall Avenue NE Project B-3 13 June 2005
• Seismic hazard areas
• Identify, delineate, and characterize all sensitive areas within a minimum of 200 feet of the
project limits
• Establish required buffer and setback areas
• Identify and assess the hazard(s) to the project due to the sensitive area
• Identify and assess the impacts of any proposed alteration to the sensitive areas
• Identify and assess other impacts by the project on the sensitive areas
• Propose mitigation, maintenance, and monitoring measures
Deliverables
Stream Report
Eight (8) copies of the Draft Stream Report for City and County review and comment
Eight (8) copies of the Revised Draft Stream Report for City and County review and comment
Eight (8) copies of the Final Stream Report incorporating the City's consolidated comments
Wetland Report
Eight (8) copies of the Draft Wetlands Report for City and County review and comment.
Eight (8) copies of the Revised Wetlands Report for City and County review and comment
Eight (8) copies of the Final Wetland Report incorporating the City's consolidated comments
Sensitive Areas Report
Eight (8) copies of the Draft Sensitive Areas Report for City and County review and comment
Eight (8) copies of the Revised Draft Sensitive Areas Studies Report for City and County review and
comment
Eight (8) copies of the Final Sensitive Areas Studies Report incorporating the City's consolidated
comments
Cultural Resources
An initial cultural resources screening has been completed by the City, and shall be provided to the
Consultant. As a result of the screening, a historic resources inventory is recommended. The
Consultant shall review available information and perform a site reconnaissance to identify possible
impacts to historic resources and possible associated mitigation requirements for the design
alternative being considered.
Cultural Resource Report
The Consultant shall perform the following:
Conduct a historic resource inventory and prepare a technical report in accordance with applicable
Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) and U.S. Secretary of
Interior standards. The inventory and report shall cover study area defined by the City based on
their preliminary delineation of a proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE). As additional project
details are defined, the City may make adjustments to finalize the proposed APE. The inventory and
report shall be used in partial fulfillment of Section 106, SEPA, and other regulatory requirements.
Deliverables
Eight (8) copies of the Draft Historic and Cultural Resources Report for City and County review and
comment
Eight (8) copies of the Revised Historic and Cultural Resources for City and County review and
comment
Supplement No. 3, Pond Redesign BERGET/ABAM, O:A04033
Duvall Avenue NE Project B-4 13 June 2005
Eight (8) copies of the Final Historic and Cultural Resources incorporating the City's consolidated
comments
Historic Building Survey
The Consultant shall perform the following:
Conduct a historic building survey in compliance with the King County landmark ordinance, which
requires all properties 40 years of age and older to be recorded. According to King County assessor
information, there are six of these structures that are within the limits of unincorporated King
County for this project.
The Consultant shall coordinate with the City to address potential project impacts to sensitive
species, particularly with respect to applicable requirements of the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Federal permits will be needed and, therefore, this project will require ESA Section 7 concurrence
from the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS). The consultant will confirm which species are federally listed by NMFS and USFWS. The
Consultant will also provide priority species and habitat information from (1) the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), Priority Habitats and Species Program, (2) the
Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), Washington Natural Heritage Program, and
(3) the City GIS. The Consultant shall review this information, as well as other appropriate sources
of information from existing literature and data resources, in conjunction with any necessary field
reconnaissance.
In conjunction with other sensitive areas site reconnaissance activities, the Consultant shall verify
the presence and availability of potential habitat for species of concern in the project action area.
These may require confirmation of potential habitat for bald eagles and other federally -listed species
beyond the immediate project area.
The Consultant will prepare required documentation for ESA compliance. Documentation for
consistency with the ESA will consist a Biological Assessment pursuant to Section 7 of the ESA. A
revised Biological Assessment Report will be prepared consistent with the WSDOT Guidelines.
Deliverables
Eight (8) copies of the Revised Draft Biological Assessment
Eight (8) copies of the Final Biological Assessment
ATTENDING MEETINGS
Attend meetings, as required, with the City and relevant agencies, to identify their major concerns.
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
• National Marine Fisheries Service
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife
• King City Department of Natural Resources
• Washington State Department of Ecology
• King County Department of Development and Environmental Services (DDES)
• King County Department of Parks System
• King County Department of Construction and Facilities Management
Supplement No. 3, Pond Redesign BERGERIABAM, O:A04033
Duvall Avenue NE Project B•5 13 June 2005
GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Based on our site visit, the Consultant will complete up to eight test pit explorations at the site to
characterize the near surface soil and groundwater conditions. The test pit explorations will be
completed with a midsize track -mounted excavator. In order to gain access to the site, the
Consultant plans to unload the excavator along the shoulder of SE 95th Way and track it across Coal
Creek Parkway into the driveway of the Brant property. Currently, there is no access for an
excavator to the Oehrling property; therefore, the Consultant plans to track the excavator from the
driveway of the Brant property onto the Oehrling property. This will require creating an opening in
the existing fence. Tracks from the excavator will remain on the ground surface in the area between
the driveway and the property line. At this time, the Consultant does not plan on restoration of the
ground surface.
Supplement No. 3, Pond Redesign BERGERIABAM, O:A04033
Duvall Avenue NE Project B-6 13 June 2005
The Oehrling property is moderately wooded with trees and underbrush. Access to the test pit
locations will require clearing of brush, small trees, and deadfall trees to allow access for the
excavator. At the test pit locations, the spoils from the test pits will be temporarily stockpiled near
the test pit. Evidence of the stockpiles and test pits will remain following backfilling of the test pit.
Efforts will be made to minimize the number of trees removed during clearing operations. The
Consultant will avoid removing any trees with diameters that exceed 6 inches. At this time, the
Consultant does not plan on restoration of the test pit or access route following completion of the
work. The test pit explorations are planned to be completed in one day.
The Consultant will require that test pit locations or several control points be established by a
surveyor prior to the exploration.
The scope of services for the geotechnical evaluation of the Oehrling property for the stormwater
facility is presented below:
Provide planned test pit locations for a surveyor to stake in the field.
2. Contact the One -Call utility locate service and have utilities located by a private utility locate
service.
3. Clear access to the planned subsurface exploration locations using a track -mounted excavator.
Clearing will be completed in a fashion that minimizes the impact to existing vegetation. Trees
larger than 6 inches diameter will not be removed.
4. Excavate up to eight test pits within the vicinity of the stormwater facility. The test pits will
be completed using a track -mounted excavator and will extend up to 12 feet below existing site
grades. The test pits will be backfilled with the spoils excavated from the test pits. The spoils
will be compacted to the extent practical using the bucket of the excavator. This work will not
include installation of temporary erosion control measures or restoration of the site following
excavation.
Complete laboratory testing on soil samples obtained from the test pits to characterize the
moisture content and grain -size distribution of the soils.
6. Provide a geotechnical evaluation of the design and stability of planned pond embankments
and on the infiltration characteristics of the on -site soils.
7. Prepare a summary memo of the results of the evaluation. This will include a summary of the
field explorations and observations, laboratory testing, and design recommendations.
Supplement No. 3, Pond Redesign BERGER/ABAM, O:A04033
Duvall Avenue NE Project B-7 13 June 2005
LNI
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, shall be amended:
The work under this supplemental agreement, other previous supplemental agreements, and the
original contract shall be completed by December 31, 2006.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the
appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action.
By: BERG R/ABAM Engineers Inc. By:
Consultant Silfnature
Approving Authority Signature
END OF SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 3
Supplement No. 3, Pond Redesign BERGER/ABAM, O:A04033
Duvall Avenue NE Project B-2 13 June 2005
KING COUNTY EXHIBIT D-1
Analysis of Costs - BERGER/ABAM Inc.
Direct Salary Cost (DSCI
PERSONNEL
Hours
Pay Rate
Cost
Project Executive
0 $
71.20 $
-
Project Manager
62
52.60
3,261
Project Engineer
0
39.60
-
Senior Engineer
310
24.20
7,502
Planner
0
Engineer/Technician
0
28.00
-
Graphics/CADD
243
27.40
6,658
Project Coordinator
8
20.30
162
Clerical
0
22.00
-
Direct Salary Cost Total
623
$
17,584
Overhead Cost
Net Fee
Reimbursables
Travel/Parking
Computer/CADD
Reproduction/Postage
Project Notebook
Public Meeting Graphics
ROW Services
BERGER/ABAM SUBTOTAL
Subconsultants: (See Exhibit G)
GeoEngineers
Widener & Associates
158.00% of DSC $ 27,782
32.00% of DSC $ 5,627
SUBTOTAL $ 50,993
SUBTOTAL -
$ 50,993
11.8% Participation $ 10,088
28.5% Participation 24,328
SUBCONSULTANTS SUBTOTAL $ 34,416
GRAND TOTAL $ 85,409
Date
EXHIBIT D-2
Reimbursables
Travel:
Mileage to County, Subconsultant Offices, and Miscellaneous
Computer:
CADD Design and Drafting
Approx 90% of CADD Hours @ $10/hr
Reproduction
Project Notebooks
Public Meeting Graphics
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Exhibit D-4
Labor Hour Estimate (COST EST.)
Project Name: Duvall Avenue NE - King County
Project No: FA PWT 04-033
Prepared By: NAS PROJECT DESIGN PRELIMINARY & FINAL DESIGN RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
Date: 11-Jul-05
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT
EXEC
PROJECT
MGR
PROJECT
ENGR
SENIOR
ENGR
PLANNER
ENGR/TECH
GRAPHIC/CA
DO
PROJECT
COORD
CLERICAL
TOTAL
SUB
DELIVERABLE
TASK 2: GEOTECHNICAL TESTING AND ANALYSIS
2.11. Site reconnaissance/review topo/access requirements
1
3
1
1
6
GEO
2.12. Develop work plan
1
2
1
4
GEO
2.13. Coordinate field work/field labor
1
5
18
2
2
261
GEO
2.14.Engineering analyses/develop recommendations
2
4
4
1
1
12
GEO
2.15. Meetings
0
GEO
2.16. Project management
4
4
GEO
2.17. Draft report
0
GEO
Report (8)
2.18. Final report
2
6
5
2
1
1
17
GEO
Report (8)
2.19. Coordinate Environmental Document & Permitting
4
8
12
2.20. Review and Comment
4
8
12
TOTAL ABAM GEOTECH TESTING 3 ANALYSIS HOURS
8
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
24
ABAM Hourly Rates
$ 206.48
$ 152.54
$ 114.84
t 70.18
$
$ 81.20
$ 79.46
$ 58.87
$ 63.80
ABAM Task 2 Cost Subtotals■
$ -
$ 1,220
$ -
$ 1,123
$
$ -
9 -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,343
TOTAL GEO GEOTECH TESTING AND ANALYSIS HOURS
7
0
0
24
0
26
2
5
5.0
69.0
GEO
GEO Hourly Rates
$ 159.58
$
$
d 130.18
$
$ 79.79
$ 83.12
$ 58.18
$ 58.18
GEO
GEO Task 2 Cost Subtotals■
$ 1,117
$ -
$
$ 3,124
$ -
9 2,075
$ 166
$ 291
$ 291
S 7,0631
GEO
Task 2 Total-
1,117
1,220
4,247
2,075
166
f 291
291
9,407
0:\200.,.. %PWT-04-033\ProjMgt\Budget\Supplement_No3_Pond_Design_ KingCounty_FINh_....s
Exhibit D-5
Labor Hour Estimate (COST EST.)
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT
EXEC
PROJECT
MGR
PROJECT
ENGR
SENIOR
ENGR
PLANNER
ENGR/ TECH
GRAPHIC/CA
Do
PROJE T
COORD
CLERICAL
TOTAL
SUB
DELIVERABLE
TASK 6: ENVIR DOC & PERMITTING
-AAA
Report
6.9. Coordinate Environmental Document & Permitting
2
4
6
6.10. Review and Comment
2
41
1
61
I
TOTAL ABAM ENVIR DOC. & PERMITTING HOURS
0
4
0
8
0
0
01
0
0
12
ABAM Hourly Rates
$ 206.48
$ 152.54
$ 114.84
$ 70.18
$
$ 81,20
$ 79.461
$ 58.87
$ 63.80
ABAM Task 6 Cost Subtotals-
$
$ 610
$ -
$ 561
$
$
$ -
$
$ -
$ 1,172
'OTAL� "`0
1,
-
A
0
...... b
......
01
' WA'
"A
�EW
3
p&q
S 1.663
, , .14%,
1 1 W
S 5611
9
s
P"RE
*A
TASK 7: SENSITIVE AREAS STUDIES AND PLAN
I
I
4
g
Ifl6W-W6fk
7.15. Coordinate Environmental Document & Permitting
2
4
6
7.16. Review and Comment
2
4
6
TOTAL ABAM SENS AREA STUDIES & PLAN HOURS
0
4
0
8
0
01
0
0
14
ABAM Hourly Rates
$ 206.48
$ 152.54
$ 114.84
$ 70.18
$
$ 81.20
$ 79.46
$ 58.87
$ 63.80
ABAM Task 7 Cost Subtotals-
$ -
$ 610
$
$ 561
$
$ .
$ -
$
$
$ 1,172
JO'rAkV"ENSITIVE-ARLk$T0 �,,RL*
0
-1
0
�'go
41,
Teak 7 Total-
Aft
02
4L'q
lWks
4,821
$ 13,245
TASK 11: CULTURAL RESOURCES
0io4cd
M,
0
um,
t,
.
........
�'Wk
-All -9 NEW
',*VA
" 4 W"m
Ne 0, �
2
an
"Q
4
6
11.4. Coordinate Cultural Resources Technical Report
11.5. Review and Comment
2
4
6
TOTAL ABAM CULTURAL RESOURCES HOURS
0
4
0
81
0
0
0
0
14
ABAM Hourly Rates
$ 206.48
$ 152.54
$ 114.84
$ 70.18
$
$ 81.20
$ 79.46
$ 5&87
$ 63.80
ABAM Task 11 Cost Subtotals-
$ -
$ 610
$ -
$ 561
$
$ -
$ -
$
$
$ 1,172
t0TAL UN WTURALIMS oulks
i
,PW ..
-4-r�, WA;6ff,6
X0,
t
ti
tAW
4, $A4
4, -4 525
vVA,
Task 11 Total-
$
$ 2,716I
$ 2,4191
561
$
$
$
5,696
0:\2004\FAPWT-04-033\ProjMgt\Budget\Supplement—No3—Pond—Desigri— KingCounty_FINAL.As
Exhibit D-6
Labor Hour Estimate (COST EST.)
DESCRIPTION
PROJECT
EXEC
PROJECT
MGR
PROJECT
ENGR
SENIOR
ENGR
PLANNER
ENGR/TECH
GRAPHICICA
DD
PROJECT
COORD
CLERICAL
TOTAL
SUB
DELIVERABLE
TASK 13: PRELIMINARY PROJECT PLANS
13.15. Review 2005 King County SWMM Manual
4
36
40
13.16. Design volume for detention pond
2
18
20
13.17. Calculate required areas (in plan view) for stormwater wetland cells
1
8
9
13.18. Calculate surface area for stormwater wetland cells
1
8
9
13.19. Calculate live storage detention for pond
1
4
5
13.20. Spifiway sizing
1
4
4
9
13.21. Jailhouse weir stzJng
1
4
4
9
13.22. Backwater analysis including pond outlet pipe
2
15
17
13.23. Design of catch basin energy dissipater and associated splash pad
2
16
25
43
1 dwg
13.24. Section views of Pond
2
12
40
54
2 dwg
13.25. Section view of control structure and emergency overflow spUway
1
25
31
1 dwg
13.26. Profile for pond outlet pipe system
2
15
25
42
1 dwg
13.27. Access road from new driveway to pond
3
10
13
13.28. Planting/ landscape plan for pond area
5
10
is
13.29. TIR
5
30
81
43
a. Provide new calculations for pond and conveyance
2
12
14
b. TIR text to include new standards (2005 KCSWM), basin
descriptions, routing
3
30
33
c. Misc Changes to existing graphics
1
5
6
13.30. Update plan set to include new property: demo, TESC, SO
5
1
60
72
4 dwgs
13.31. Redesign access road to park property
2
14
10
26
13.32 Update ROW plans and legal descriptions
2
16
35
53
2 rev & 1 new dwg
TOTAL PRELIMINARY PROJECT PLANS HOURS
0
42
0
270
0
0
243
8
0
563
ABAM Houtly Rates
1 $ 206.481
$ 152.541
$ 114.84
$ 70.18
$
$ 81.201
$ 79.46
$ 58.87
$ 63.80
ABAM Task 13 Cost Subtotals-1
$
9 6,407
$
$ 18,949
$
S
$ 19,309
$ 471
9
$ 45,135
Task 13 Total-
OA2004,. hPWT-04-033\ProjMgt\Budget\Supplement_No3_Pond_Design_ KingCounty_FINr+—Is
Exhibit D-7
Labor Hour Estimate (COST EST.)
DESCRIPTION
EXEC
ECT
MGR
PROJECT
ENGR
SENIOR
ENGR
PLANNER
ENGR/ TECH
GRAPHIC/C
DO
PROJECT
COORD
CLERICAL
TOTAL
SUB
DELIVERABLE
SUMMARY OF LABOR HOURS BY CONSULTANT
TOTAL THIS PHASE
BERGER/ABAM Engineers
0
62
0
310
0
0
243
8
0
623
ARAM Hourly Rates
$ 206.48
E 152.54
$ 114.84
$ 70.18
$
$ 81.20
$ 79.46
$ 58.87
$ 63.80
ABAM Cost Subtotals=
$ -
$ 9,457
$ -
$ 21,756
$
$ -
$ 19,309
$ 471
$ -
$ 60,993
Goo Engineers
7
0
0
24
0
26
2
5
5
69
GEO
GEO HourlyRates
$ 159.58
$
$
$ 130.16
$
$ 79.79
$ 83.12
$ 58.18
$ 58.18
GEO
GEO Cost Subtotals=
$ 1,117
$
$
$ 3,124
9
$ 2,075
$ 166
$ 291
$ 291
$ 7,063
GEO
YVldenbr14';Assoolates r. :y ,.,. ,.r
tl
56
l60
02
0
0
$
5..,
iiVV�kF
_ ....�.....N .,r
z�s�
.^TM,$•�_
.r�.Rv
TOTAL ALL LABOR HOURS
7
118
160
334
0
26
245
13
5
908
TOTAL=j
Does
not Inclucfe
rellnbUrsableS costs as noted
in the budget
sum maryirapplicable
77,5
0:\2004\FAPWT-04-033\ProjMgt\Budget\Supplement No3_Pond_Design_ KingCounty_FINAL.As
EXHIBIT G-1
Sub -Consultant Analysis of Costs - GeoEngineers
Direct Salary Cost (DSC)
PERSONNEL
Hours
Pay Rate
Cost
Project Executive
7 $
48.00
$
336
Associate
0
-
Senior Environmental Geologist
0
-
Project Engineer/Senior Engineer
24
39.15
940
Engineer/Scientist 2
0
-
Engineer/Scientist 1
26
24.00
624
Senior Technican
2
25.00
50
Project Coordinator
5
17.50
88
Clerical
5
17.50
88
Direct Salary Cost Total
69
$
2,125
Overhead Cost
197.46%
of DSC
$
4,195
Net Fee
35.00%
of DSC
744
SUBTOTAL
$
7,063
Reimbursables
Travel/Parking (120 miles @ $0.405/mile)
Field equipment
Geotechnical laboratory testing
Subcontracted drilling
Subcontracted backhoe
Subcontracted private utility locate
Computer/CADD
Reproduction/Postage
$ 49
$98
$1,000
$1,520
$304
$30
$24
SUBTOTAL $ 3,025
TOTAL $ 10,088
EXHIBIT G-2
Sub -Consultant Analysis of Costs - Widener Associates
Direct Salary Cost (DSC)
PERSONNEL
Hours Pay Rate Cost
Project Executive
0 $ _ _
Project Manager
56 47.00 2,632
Project Engineer
160 27.00 4,320
Senior Engineer
0 _ _
Planner
0 _ _
Engineer/Technician
0 _ _
Graphics/CADD
0 _ _
Project Coordinator
0 _ _
Clerical
0
Direct Salary Cost Total
Overhead
Net Fee
Reimbursables
Travel/Parking (400 miles @0.405/mile)
Reproduction/Postage
Communications
Cultural Resources Sub
216
$ 6,952
150.00%
of DSC
$
10,428
30.00%
of DSC
$
2,086
SUBTOTAL
$
19,466
$ 212
250
4,400
SUBTOTAL 4,862
TOTAL $ 24,328
CAG-03-151 Adden #1-04
Supplemental Agreement No. 1
Contract Number
Organization and Address
CAG-03-151
BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc.
33301 Ninth Avenue South, Suite 300
Federal Way, WA 98003
Project Number
Phone
206/431-2300
Project Title
New Maximum Amount Payable
Coal Creek Parkway
$533,807
Renton City Limits to SE 951"
Way
Description of Work
Supplement No. 1 includes topographic survey to extend the existing base maps to the limits of
the proposed improvements.
See Section I below.
The Local Agency of City of Renton desires to supplement the agreement entered into with
BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. and executed on 25 September 2003 and identified as Contract No.
CAG-03-151.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows.
Section I, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
This scope of services for survey applies to those areas along Coal Creek Parkway necessary to
analyze entering sight distances at intersections and driveways within the project limits as well as
provide survey information for the preliminary and final design of the roadway edges and potential
storm drainage facilities. The work includes
Survey Area
• Extend survey 100' from both sides of the existing ROW line from Sta. 204+20 to 218+00.
• Extend survey 15' from the existing ROW for parcel 1094000010
• Survey the entire parcel 0323059116 (Brant).
• Survey existing driveway south of parcel 0323059116
• Survey 50' strip of parcel 0323059112 (Cook).
• Entire buildings/structures within 100' of existing ROW line in the following parcels:
0323059136
0323059052
0323059005
• Survey the entire Parcel 3424059086 (Oehrling).
• Extend survey from North side of parcel 3424059086 to the far edge of the bed of May Creek
P00123/Supplement-No 7.doc Exhibit B-1
The survey will include:
• Documenting parcel street addresses.
• Completing incomplete or missing ROW limits
• Documenting utility pipestsleeves specifications (locations, diameters and materials) for
storm drainage,culverts, sanitary sewer, and water,
• Documenting telephone and cable lines, underground power lines, power poles, and fiber
optic lines.
• Including missing utility lines information.
• Determining boundary limits between the City of Renton and King County as well as
between King County and City of Newcastle.
• Research of existing utilities and property boundaries along May Creek
• Calculations of right-of-way lines, elevations, and contours
Deliverables will include:
• AutoCad drawing(s) with survey data shown: Topographic survey of data collected including
right of way lines, contouring, and utilities in specified survey area.
• AutoCad drawing will match to existing data provided by the City of Renton.
• All point data and copies of field notes will be provided.
• Project manager will provide status updates during the course of this work.
This scope provides time for the Consultant to prepare, administer, and coordinate Sander &
Associates contract.
IV
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION shall be amended:
The work under this supplemental agreement, other previous supplemental agreements and the
original contract shall be completed by October 31, 2004.
V
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended:
To include hours and expenses as set forth in the attached Exhibits D and G, and by this reference
made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the
appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action.
By: BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc.
By: CITY OF RENTON, WA
/• .��1��0
Consultarif Signature A roving Authority Signature
Kathy eolker—Wheeler, Mayor
ATTEST: 4. WCL&ey,—
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
POO) 23/Supplenwnt- No 7 doc - ExhibitB-2
Y MAY MEEK BED ARO DUVALL
*V SiIM S AppR%, RD DATA AVAILABLE)
EXHIBIT D-1
Analysis of Costs - BERGER/ABAM Inc.
Direct Salary Cost (DSC
PERSONNEL
Project Executive
Project Manager
Project Engineer
Senior Engineer
Planner
Engineer/Technician
Graphics/CADD
Project Coordinator
Clerical
Direct Salary Cost Total
Overhead Cost
Net Fee
Reimbursables
Travel/Parking
Computer/CADD
Reproduction/Postage
Project Notebook
Public Meeting Graphics
ROW Services
BERGER/ABAM SUBTOTAL
Subconsultants: (See Exhibit G)
Sanders & Associates
wiL"
-Jam
Hours
Pay Rate
Cost
$
62.50
$
-
4
50.00
200
20
37.40
748
33.00
-
35.50
-
20
26.80
536
26.20
-
20.30
-
20.60
-
44
$
1,484
158.00%
of DSC
$
2,345
32.00%
of DSC
$
475
SUBTOTAL
$
4,304
SUBTOTAL
-
$
4,304
$ 42,504
SUBCONSULTANTS SUBTOTAL $ 42,504
GRAND TOTAL $ 46,807
3/q/b4/
Date
EXHIBIT D-2
Reimbursables
Travel:
Computer:
Reproduction
$0
$0
$0
Project Notebooks $0
EXHIBIT D-3
THIS SHEET LEFT BLANK
EXIHBIT G
SUBCONTRACTED WORK
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for the following portions of the work of this AGREEMENT.
■ Sanders & Associates
13256 Northup Way, Suite 15
Bellevue, WA 98005
P00123/Supplement-No Tdo Exhibit G-1
Direct Salary Cost (DSC
PERSONNEL
Principal
PLS
Survey Crew (2-man)
CADD
Flagger (1)
Administration
Direct Salary Cost Total
Overhead Cost
Net Fee
Reimbursables
EXHIBIT G-2
Sub -Consultant Analysis of Costs - Sanders & Associates
Stakes and Field Supplies
Survey Equipment ($100 per day)
Flagging Equipment ($8 per hour)
Hours
Pay Rate
Cost
3 $
55.28 $
166
32
42.50
1,360
196
29.64
5,809
126
40.00
5,040
82
21.00
1,722
8
19.25
154
447
$
14,251
150.00% of DSC
$ 21,377
30.00% of DSC
4,275
SUBTOTAL
$ 39,904
$ 600
$2,000
SUBTOTAL
$ 2,600
TOTAL $ 42,504
DUVALL/NEWCASTLE PROJECT AREA
(Shaded) Not to scale
May Creek Bridge— — —
sF
Newcastle City Li m itsN ton Reh
n
-- -- w<
City of Renton
Duvall Ave.
Widenieg Project
City of Renton
Sunset/Duvall I
Improvement F
--- 'Kina Co.
Li m itS King Coun
- --
! Renton
CAG-03-151 Addendum #2-04
Supplemental Agreement No. 2
Contract Number
Organization and Address
CAG-03-151
BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc.
33301 Ninth Avenue South, Suite 300
Federal Way, WA 98003
Project Number
Phone
206/431-2300
Project Title
New Maximum Amount Payable
Coal Creek Parkway
$535,819
Renton City Limits to SE 951" Way
Description of Work
Supplement No. 2-includes Environmental Site Assessment on one property and extends the
complete date for the project. See Sections I and IV below.
The Local Agency of City of Renton desires to supplement the agreement entered into with
BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. and executed on 25 September 2003 and identified as Contract No.
CAG-03-151.
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows.
Section I, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
This scope of services for an environmental site assessment for the Brant property to provide
information for the preliminary and final design of the roadway edges and potential storm drainage
facilities.
This scope provides time for the Consultant to prepare, administer, and coordinate GeoEngineers
contract.
IV
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION shall be amended:
The work under this supplemental agreement, other previous supplemental agreements and the
original contract shall be completed July 31, 2005.
V
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended:
To include hours and expenses as set forth in the attached Exhibits D and G, and by this reference
made a part of this supplement.
POO129/Su pplemel-No, Tdoc Exhibit B-]
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the
appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action.
By: BERGER/ABAM Engineers Inc. By:
Consultant Signature
I
p c�f ayes V/
Approving Authority Signature
//4 A -0
YW123/Supplement-No 7 d1x Exhibit B-2
EXHIBIT D-1
Analysis of Costs - BERGER/ABAM Inc.
Direct Salary Cost (DSC)
PERSONNEL
Hours
Pay Rate
Cost
Project Executive
$
62.50
$ -
Project Manager
0
50.00
-
Project Engineer
37.40
-
Senior Engineer
33-00
-
Planner
35.50
-
Engineer/Technician
26.80
-
Graphics/CADD
26.20
-
Project Coordinator
20.30
-
Clerical
20.60
-
Direct Salary Cost Total
0
$ -
Overhead Cost
158.00%
of DSC
$ -
Net Fee
32.00%
of DSC
$ -
SUBTOTAL
$ -
Reimbursables
Travel/Parking
Computer/CADD
Reproduction/Postage
Project Notebook
Public Meeting Graphics
ROW Services
BERGER/ABAM SUBTOTAL
Subconsultants: (See Exhibit G)
GeoEngineers
SUBTOTAL -
$ 2,012
SUBCONSULTANTS SUBTOTAL $ 2,012
GRAND TOTAL $ 2,012
-1/4.rasp
Date
EXHIBIT D-2
Reimbursabies
Travel:
Computer:
Reproduction
Project Notebooks
$0
$0
011
$0
EXHIBIT G
SUBCONTRACTED WORK
The AGENCY permits subcontracts for the following portions of the work of this AGREEMENT.
GeoEngineers, Inc.
8410 154`h Avenue NE
Redmond Wa. 98052
PI)OPL3/Supplenient -No 7 doc Exhibit G-1
EXHIBIT G-2
Sub -Consultant Analysis of Costs - GeoEngineers
Direct Salary Cost (DSC)
PERSONNEL
Hours
Pay Rate
Cost
Project Executive
0 $
45.00 $
Associate
0
40.00
Senior Environmental Geologist
21
35.00
Project Engineer/Senior Engineer
0
735
Engineer/Scientist 2
0
33.00
Engineer/Scientist 1
0
23.00
Senior Technican
10
19.00
Project Coordinator
25.00
250
Clerical
0
18.00
2
17.00
34
Direct Salary Cost Total
33
$
1,019
Overhead Cost
197.46%
of DSC $
2,012
Net Fee
30.00%
of DSC
306
SUBTOTAL $
TOTAL $ 2,012
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION
(Duvall Ave NE (Coal Creek Parkway) - King County
ming roadway to 5 lanes, includes: curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements, street lighting,
nelization, signal modification and interconnection, and bikeway from Renton's north city limits to SE
Way (Newcastle's south city limits).
TIFICATION:
ving residential areas use this route which is also becoming a major through route between Renton
Bellevue, as well as freight traffic. There are currently two general-purpose lanes with little or no
Wrian facilities, and left -turn lanes at various locations. Because there are uncompleted gaps
Peen the five -lane sections from unincorporated King County to Sunset Bv., the arterial exhibits
lestion and travel -time delays for all modes of traffic.
Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317
Proj. Length: Proj: 12305
RANK: 53 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319
STATUS:
The City is managing the King County project with full reimbursement from the County per
approved interlocal agreement. All programmed funding is subject to King County's
ongoing approval. King County manages the grant reimbursement for their TIB grant
award of $3,196,000.
CHANGES:
Construction delayed to 2005 or 2006 due to environmental, drainage and County
coordination issues. Increase in construction cost estimate. R-O-W costs, other than
minor administrative costs, have been removed; R-O-W will be purchased directly by King
County. Funding spent tracked through project spreadsheet, not Eden, due to project split -
out; actual reimbursement shown Pre-2005.
V111 NIIViiV .
Project ota s Programmed Pre-2006 Six -Year Pro ram
cvoc�iece. ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 20072008 2009 1 2010 1 2011
oe%veoos en.w
5 - 53 FINAL
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
6
Submitting Data:
Planning/Building/Public Works
For Agenda of. October 17, 2005
Dept/Div/Board..
Utility Systems/Surface Water
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Lys Hornsby (ext. 7239)
Ron Straka (ext. 7248)
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat
Plan Ratification
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution............ X
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Issue paper
Study Sessions......
Resolution
Information.........
Executive Summary
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Approvals:
Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept...... X
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: $10,400 (2006)
Expenditure Required... $10,400 (2006) Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $10,400 (2006) Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $10,400 (2006) City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Salmon Habitat Plan (Plan) for the Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 has been
completed. The members of the WRIA 9 Forum have recommended that the Plan be submitted
for ratification by jurisdictions within WRIA 9. The Plan recommends the actions (programs,
projects and regulations) and strategies that would protect, preserve and improve habitat within
WRIA 9 in response to the Endangered Species Act listing of Chinook salmon as threatened. The
Plan has been completed in accordance with the City's approved November 13, 2000, Interlocal
Agreement for the development of this Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the
resolution ratifying the Plan.
C:\Documents and Settings\mpetersen\Local Settings\Temp\WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan RatificationAGENDABILL.doc\RStp
`SY O� PLANNING/BUILDING/
- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
0 M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: October 6, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
VIA: �L Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
FROM: Gregg Zimmermald,Aedministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor (ext. 7248)
SUBJECT: WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan Ratification
ISSUE:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department requests Council approval of a
resolution ratifying the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water
Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9, Salmon Habitat Plan (Plan), Making Our Watershed
Fit For A King, dated August 2005.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
sign the resolution ratifying the Plan.
BACKGROUND:
In accordance with the Interlocal Agreement for WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Planning,
which was approved by the City in November of 2000 along with 17 other jurisdictions
in WRIA 9, the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan has been completed for ratification. The
WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan was developed in response to the March 1999 listing of the
Puget Sound Chinook Salmon as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). The Plan was produced over the last 5 years by the WRIA 9 Steering Committee,
which included representative stakeholder groups including cities, counties,
environmental groups, business groups, state agencies and citizens. The WRIA 9 Forum,
which consists of elected representatives from jurisdictions within WRIA 9, has reviewed
the Plan and recommended that it be forwarded for ratification by each jurisdiction within
WRIA 9.
The WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan incorporated a comprehensive scientific review of the
current and future habitat conditions, current fish use of the habitat and problems that are
Council/WRIA9 Ratification
October 6, 2005
Page 2 of 3
affecting the habitat. Based upon the review, actions were identified that can be
implemented over the next 10 years that will help to protect, improve and restore habitat,
which is beneficial to Chinook salmon, bull trout and other fisheries resources. These
efforts will complement habitat improvements in other parts of Puget Sound and changes
to hatchery and harvest practices and contribute to the overall recovery of Puget Sound
Chinook salmon and bull trout. In addition, these measures provide other benefits such
as water quality protection, open space preservation, flood hazard reduction, maintenance
of cultural heritage and general quality of life benefits. If, as a region, we lose the ability
to maintain healthy ecosystems to the point where fisheries resources are lost, it will
result in increased regulatory requirements as a result of the Endangered Species Act or
the Clean Water Act, and will eventually affect the beneficial uses (swimming, boating,
fishing, aesthetics, water supply) that we all enjoy.
The Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed (WRIA 9) includes a total
area of 664 square miles that includes 93 miles of the Green/Duwamish River and 90
miles of Puget Sound shoreline and numerous tributary streams and other water bodies.
The current Chinook salmon is highly variable and ranges between 2,450 to 11,500 adults
per year. The 2004 estimated human population within WRIA 9 is 630,329.
The City of Renton is located within the Lower Green River Sub -watershed. The
primary habitat used by Chinook salmon in the Lower Green River Sub -watershed is the
Green/Duwamish River. The City does not have any of the Green/Duwamish River
within its corporate limits. However, the Black River and Springbrook Creek (both
located in Renton) flow into the Green/Duwamish River and are also used by Chinook
salmon. The priority habitat improvements in this Sub -watershed are protection of water
quality and quantity, restoration of sediment process and improvement of mainstream
river, tributary and off -channel habitats. These actions will increase rearing habitat,
spawning productivity and survival of salmon at the adult, juvenile and egg -to -fry life
stages.
The actions in the plan are divided into 2 main categories:
• WRIA 9 Watershed -Wide Programs: These include 17 programmatic actions and
public education and stewardship, incentive programs, regulatory
recommendations and enforcement. The focus is on protecting riparian habitat,
water quality, and managing storm water runoff from existing and new
construction.
Lower Green River Sub -watershed Specific Policies, Programs and Projects: Site
specific projects to improve habitat by setting back levees where possible,
restoring off -channel habitat, including modifying the Black River Pump Station
to improve fish passage and rehabilitating habitat for rearing and off -channel
habitat on Springbrook Creek and acquisition of sites with good habitat or where
habitat can be restored.
IIAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2760 WRIA 9 Planning\WRIA 9
Forum\City Correspondence\WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan Ratification Issue paper.doc\RStp
Council/WR1A9 Ratification
October 6, 2005
Page 3 of 3
The WRIA 9 Plan recommends an adaptive management approach to take advantage of
opportunities to implement actions, to assess progress, and to adjust actions, as we learn
more. Monitoring is also a component of the Plan, used to evaluate how well the Plan is
being implemented and measuring how well individual actions are working to provide the
intended benefits.
The WRIA 9 Plan sets a high goal for the implementation of actions over the next 10
years. The estimated total cost to implement the identified priority projects range from
$198 million to $291 million. The primary sources of funding for implementation of the
Plan include the State Salmon Recovery Funding Board, the Army Corps of Engineers
Green/Duwamish Watershed Ecosystem Restoration Program, the King Conservation
District Assessment that provides funding to each WRIA in King County, local
governments and other state and federal funding sources.
Local government funding will initially stay the same or decrease slightly. A review of
possible new funding sources by the local governments within WRIA 9 is recommended
and funding commitment will be considered during this review and the development of a
new interlocal agreement for Plan implementation. The increase in funding for the Plan
implementation is expected to come primarily from state and federal funding sources. If
the funding needed to implement the Plan is not secured, it will take longer to implement.
The City of Renton Surface Water Utility has contributed approximately $13,000 per
year, in accordance with the approved Interlocal Agreement, to the WRIA 9 Salmon
Habitat Plan development. In 2006, the City is requested to provide approximately
$10,400 to fund the administrative resources needed to start work on Plan
implementation. It is anticipated that this range of funding ($10,400 to $13,000 per year)
will continue for the implementation of the Plan. In 2006, a new interlocal agreement
will be developed for approval by the jurisdictions in WRIA 9. This agreement will
establish the level of funding from local governments, the organizational structure and
how the Plan will be implemented.
CONCLUSION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends approval of the resolution
ratifying the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource
Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, Making Our Watershed Fit For A King,
dated August 2005.
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2760 WRIA 9 Planning\WRIA 9
Forum\City Correspondence\WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan Ratification Issue paper.doc\RStp
CITY OF RENTON, WASMNGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
RATIFYING THE "WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA) 9
SALMON HABITAT PLAN, MAKING OUR WATERSHED FIT FOR A
KING."
WHEREAS, in March 1999, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) Fisheries listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon evolutionary significant unit as a
threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA); and
WHEREAS, in November 1999, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
listed the Puget Sound bull trout distinct population segment as a threatened species under the
ESA; and
WHEREAS, significant areas of the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound
Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9, are designated by the federal government as
critical salmon habitat; and
WHEREAS, coordination and cooperation among federal, state, and local agencies,
tribes, businesses, non -governmental organizations, landowners, citizens, and other interests are
essential to plan for and implement a salmon recovery plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton supports cooperation at the WRIA level to set common
priorities for actions among partners, efficient use of resources and investments, and distribution
of responsibility for actions and expenditures;
WHEREAS, 17 local governments in WRIA 9 entered into an inter -local agreement in
2001 to jointly fund development of the Green Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed,
RESOLUTION NO.
Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, Making our Watershed Fit for a King,
published August 10, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, developed by a steering committee
comprised of multiple interests, includes a wide variety of actions that focus on habitat recovery
for Chinook salmon, bull trout, and other salmonids for the next 10 years and prioritizes them to
guide efforts to recover the Green River Chinook salmon population; and
WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan is based upon a sound scientific
foundation, and includes an adaptive management approach and funding strategy for
implementation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The City of Renton hereby ratifies the Green/Duwamish and
Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan,
Making our Watershed Fit for a King, dated August 2005. This resolution does not obligate the
City of Renton Council to future appropriations beyond current authority.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 72005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12005.
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
2
RESOLUTION NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES. I 136:10/05/05 : ma
SALMON HABITAT PLAN
Making Our 1A
sat
z?%,
•�
y
M
t
Y
WIN"
� z
�i
IN
IMyll
•A i1�1111irI. �' e"91!'.gOlr'tMma z111�1�11�1
RAI
if,
147,
'• '�" `^" .. ...�.{# 4 s X "'�' .,•,♦"�' w µme►- "A► .. i.�
Grp hlDutvamish and
Central PugetSound Watershed
` Water Resource
fi
d n
rrr;. fi ri-Inve�t�t4 -YArPa 9 -
y� .y*. `' Ma..,.• `, • 9 � ,� �:. �,. .: � use" �, -- � . . e
OKI*, AR,
•�.,4 fy k"i .�� #� iv+�N "ja.�"`h'S y,ea. +M .'r'.e
�V ie4 ♦ . " `s .�
�M1- � r P �-�'-u�wM► as � ta#Y..f1�+ ` !? � • �X� ..a � �.�-; �� ��
The story of salmon in Puget Sound is one told in
rivers, streams, and the marine waters of Puget Sound.
That story of migration, spawning, growth,
abundance, and decline is a common one,
experienced by all of the watersheds in the Puget
Sound region, including the Green/Duwamish and
Central Puget Sound Watershed (Figure 1-1).
But the future of this story is in jeopardy. Will people a
century hence view the salmon as a living icon of their
watersheds? Or will it be a historical symbol of a
bygone era that can only be viewed in the wild by
traveling to Canada or Alaska? Will future stories
acknowledge the wisdom and effort of our generation,
which saw problems and boldly solved them? Or will
our descendents shake their heads at our lack of
understanding and commitment that left them an
impoverished watershed that functioned poorly for
both people and fish?
No less important is the fact that the present decline in
watershed health that harms salmon also jeopardizes
other goods and services that the watershed provides
its many human residents at low or no cost: clean,
abundant water, locally -grown foods, forest products,
flood protection, recreational opportunities, and great
natural beauty. Will we take action to conserve a
resource that benefits us daily in many ways?
We who share this watershed have an opportunity to
shape the answers to these questions as we decide
whether and how to implement the recommendations
of this Salmon Habitat Plan.
After 120 years of intense development, the strains on
fish and the ecosystem of the Green/Duwamish and
Central Puget Sound Watershed began to be apparent
to many. We ask much from our watershed. The
ecosystem goods and services it provides include water
for drinking and industrial purposes, food, forest
products, waste assimilation, numerous recreational
opportunities, and floodwater retention. For many
years, it provided a wealth of salmon, too. As more of
these goods and services have been demanded than
can be sustainably renewed, watershed health has
suffered. In response to these stresses and changes in
national, state, and local priorities over the last three
decades, we have begun to take better care of the
watershed and its ecosystem.
Green/Dnwan sh and Central
Puget Sound
Watershed (WRIA 9) at a Glance
Human population:
630,329 (2004 est.)
Chinook salmon population:
2,450 to 11,500 adults per year
(highly variable)
Appraised land value:
$27.6 billion
Improvements value:
$43.9 billion
Square miles:
664 total (575 land area)
River miles (mainstem):
93
Puget Sound shoreline miles:
90
Value of ecological goods and services per
year (waste assimilation, recreation, flood
reduction, etc.):
$1.7 billion to $6.3 billion per year
(depending on assumptions)
Page 1-1
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
People and fish are never far apart in the watershed, as shown herein
Auburn at rivermile 30 on the Green River. July 2004 photo.
Stewardship of the watershed is evolving. For over a
century following European settlement, the watershed
was a bank from which resources could be drawn
seemingly endlessly. The Green/Duwamish and
Central Puget Sound Watershed offered a bounty of
drinking water, fish, forest products, farm products,
and minerals. Later, it became a center for commerce
and industry in Western Washington and the water-
shed became a sink into which wastes could be poured
with apparently few consequences. In the 1960s,
environmental protection efforts began to address
some of the consequences of these patterns of use.
Initial efforts focused on specific, obvious problems
such as point source water pollution from factories.
Recent recognition of the ecological importance of the
entire watershed has resulted in a broader apprecia-
tion of the environmental health and ecological
integrity of the watershed. Beginning in the 1980s,
people in the watershed began to seek to reduce on-
going sources of harm, protect remaining healthy
habitats, and restore degraded areas. During the 1990s,
a wide variety of private and public land owners and
managers committed to being better stewards of the
farm, forest lands, parks, and natural areas that make
up much of the watershed. Improvements in growth
management and stormwater practices helped reduce
the impacts of the rapid population growth and
development in the last decade of the 20th century.
The federal government listing of Chinook salmon and
bull trout as "threatened" under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA) accelerated the change in perspec-
tive and a greater motivation for action. The Green/
Duwamish summer/fall Chinook and Newaukum
Creek summer/fall stocks are included in the Puget
Sound Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) for Chi-
nook. This ESU was listed as "threatened" under the
ESA in 1999.
In response to these federal listings, the WRIA 9 ( Water
Resource Inventory Area) Forum of Local Governments
helped fund the creation of this Salmon Habitat Plan
("Plan") to guide protection and restoration of Chinook
salmon and bull trout in the Green/Duwamish and
Central Puget Sound Watershed. The Forum includes
all the local governments —15 cities and King County —
in the watershed. The City of Tacoma also is a partner
because of the importance of the Green River for its
municipal water supply.
This Habitat Plan recommends actions that should be
taken over the next 10 years to protect and restore
salmon habitat, using an ecosystem approach, in the
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed.
These efforts will complement habitat improvements
in other parts of Puget Sound and changes to hatchery
and harvest practices and thereby contribute to the
recovery of Puget Sound Chinook salmon and bull
trout.
Even within the watershed, this Salmon Habitat Plan is
a piece of a larger picture. Many individuals, non-profit
groups, businesses, and governments have worked
hard to protect and improve ecosystem health and
salmon habitat for years. Some have made long-term
commitments that will contribute greatly to watershed
salmon recovery.
This Plan recommends a comprehensive approach to
protect and restore salmon habitat in the Green/
Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed. It
provides a strategy to accelerate salmon habitat
recovery locally and recommends specific and achiev-
able projects, programs, and policies that can be
implemented within the first 10 years following plan
adoption. The Plan relies on an ecosystem approach
Page 1-2
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
Duwamish Estuary
` Subwatershed
BuaIEN �.Jl r Kwria102
j - 0 Middle
y«,:, ✓ .;,a i `f Green River
Subwatershed
i `r L
un
FIGURE 1-1
Green/Duwamish and Central =
Puget Sound Watershed WRIA 9
Location Map
03 04
os —
os
�s NO Is LINTY'
0g.(edu.
mamish 07
1is _ KI G COUNTY
39
t
o J: V
Marine t 3Nearshore.� �� �aR . gip, • s3` n r;b0
so
SubwatershedAl .S .. "�Y
Lower \ �, a0� v n {
Green River
Subwatershed Y r' `
..
I River Mile
.1
• River Mile at Subwatershed Boundaryso
85
' River
Major Road
Upper
Urban Growth Area Line N Green River "
--I—WRIA9Subwatershed Boundar A.nlr. a..imnl.anomnlnl„nlW,.ni�,nn Subwatershed
y Kon1f0 MSalmo UUliranon'lWYlomv al t9]51
mm rM.i.i k
%�oO' WRIA 9 Boundary w�cwnnow.awK.ala,.a rFro
0 3 JM1n pNRV GarM NUNwalComm{Wep Un1E
FM
Open Water August 2005 osa xvwe ia: wn[
with a focus on the needs of Chinook salmon. Many if
not most of its recommendations also will benefit bull
trout (also listed as "threatened) and other non -listed
species such as coho salmon and steelhead trout.
Watershed ecosystem health and salmon recovery is a
long-term task that will take decades and may last as
long as a century. While this Plan focuses on actions in
the next 10 years, it provides tools that can be used in
the future to develop and evaluate actions. Its adaptive
management program, moreover, will provide valuable
information to further refine and target additional
actions. This Plan has a practical, 10-year focus for
most actions complemented by a long-term vision and
enduring tools for further work. These actions and
vision, as well as other interesting facts about the
watershed, are depicted in the WRIA 9 poster, "Making
our Watershed Fit for a King."
Although the recommendations of this Habitat Plan
are based on the best collective judgment of its many
authors, new information in the future should be used
to refine and modify these recommendations. To be
most effective, this Plan should be considered a "living
document." What this means is that when someone
picks up a copy in 2015, they'll find dog-eared pages,
implementation notes jotted alongside project de-
scriptions, inserted summaries of new scientific
information, new project ideas on post -its, project
construction and ribbon -cutting photos inserted
between pages, references to monitoring reports for
completed projects, and, assuredly, a dust -free cover.
The Plan before you is the product of ever -greater
voluntary cooperation in assessing, planning for, and
acting to meet salmon habitat needs across the water-
shed. Local governments, federal and state agencies,
business and environmental interests, private property
owners, volunteers, and interested citizens have
demonstrated enormous dedication and public
spiritedness. They are essential participants in this
long, increasingly fruitful endeavor. Good stewardship
of the watershed and its salmon populations in the
years ahead will surely rely on continued cooperation
and shared responsibility.
Native -origin Chinook salmon in the Green/
Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed could
become extinct within our lifetimes.
In response to this possibility, the National Marine
Fisheries Service (now known as NOAA Fisheries)
listed Puget Sound Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshaurytscha) as a threatened species under the ESA in
March 1999. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed
bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) as a threatened
species in November 1999.
Approximately 106 wild salmon stocks in the Pacific
Northwest are now extinct, 214 are at high or
moderate risk of extinction, and others being reviewed
for listing under the Endangered Species Act.
The causes of decline attributable to human activities
include:
• Hydropower operations;
• Fishing (harvest);
• Poor hatchery practices; and
• Degradation of habitat through land use and
water -use practices.
The Green River is the primary source of drinking water for the City of
Tacoma and many of its suburbs. Water is diverted at the Tacoma
Head works at river mile 61. July 2004 photo.
Page 1-5
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
In addition, climatic and ocean changes are respon-
sible for natural variability that provides a background
of change. Predation of salmon by mammals, birds,
and other fish during different life history stages also
has an impact on salmon populations.
Although the relative impact of these factors varies
among watersheds, habitat loss and degradation are
considered contributing factors in the decline of most
salmonid' populations (Spence et al.1996).
Although many people are working today to help
salmon in our watershed, more work is needed to
arrest the decline of these fish and restore the health of
the ecosystem that sustains them. This Habitat Plan
builds on existing work and takes advantage of the
latest scientific understanding to chart a course for
habitat improvements over the next 10 years and
provides tools and information for the years beyond.
The watershed Habitat Plan relies on local knowledge
and dedication to identify and solve problems in our
watershed. It is part of the commitment across Puget
Sound to develop a bottom -up recovery plan that will
meet the requirements of the Endangered Species Act
while being informed by the knowledge and values of
our communities. This Puget Sound -wide plan — the
Shared Strategy— will be the venue for integrating
habitat solutions for this watershed with other habitat
efforts and efforts to address hatchery, harvest, and
hydropower impacts.
There is another compelling reason for marshalling the
resources and energy to implement this Habitat Plan:
the health of the watershed. The Green/Duwamish and
Central Puget Sound Watershed sustains a human
population of 630,000 people with goods and services
worth billions of dollars.
Just a few of these include:
• Domestic water supply;
• Produce and other farm products;
• Forest products;
• Mitigation of floods and droughts;
• Detoxification and decomposition of wastes;
• Recreational opportunities; and
• Aesthetic beauty.
Healthy watersheds provide many of these services for
free and in perpetuity and others at low cost. As our
watershed is degraded, we lose these services or have
to pay more to create substitutes (e.g., stormwater
systems to manage runoff exacerbated by large
amounts of pavement). Investments in ecosystem
health to benefit salmon and bull trout also will yield
benefits for people. Alternatively, failure to act to
protect and restore the watershed - which may cause
the loss of wild Chinook salmon— will cost us in other
ways as well.
The needs of salmon are few and straightforward. They
need:
• Cool, unpolluted water;
• Spawning gravels that are not scoured out by high
flows or covered up with deposits of fine sediment;
• Accessible freshwater habitats- side channels, off -
channel marshes and sloughs, and shallow water
areas — that provide food, shelter from predators,
and refuge from high stream flows;
• Nearshore marine habitats that provide food,
shelter, and migration corridors to and from the
Pacific Ocean; and
• An opportunity to return to their natal streams at
the time they are ready to spawn.
Long-term salmon recovery depends on:
• Protecting existing high quality habitat;
• Protecting and improving water quality and
ensuring adequate streamflows;
• Restoring rivers, streams, estuaries, and nearshore
habitats that have been degraded, guided by an
understanding of population needs, current
habitat conditions, and the salmon -producing
capacity of streams, rivers, and the marine
nearshore;
• Maximizing access to suitable habitats in the
watershed;
• Reforming hatcheries so their management
supports viable salmonid populations; and
• Managing harvest to ensure adequate escapement
of wild -spawning fish.
1. Salmonids include salmon, trout, and chars (including bull trout) from the Family Salmonidae.
Page 1-6
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
EGGS GRAVEL
Female salmon lay 2,000
to 4,000 eggs in clean,
FRY ALEVIN ri -" well -oxygenated gravel.
After they lose the egg sac, In about 50 days, the baby '
these pine -needle sized fish salmon hatch, but they stay in
must feed on their own. the gravel, getting food from a yolk y
qt
sac still attached to their bodies.
they grow, they acquire
ark markings to camouflage e "-
themselves in the shady
pebbles of the river. The Salmon Cycle
SMOLT
After 2 to 16 months, these young
salmon start their long journey to
the sea. Their kidneys and gills change
to prepare them for life in salt water,
and they turn silver to camouflage
themselves in the ocean.
: -� Is:
ADULT KING (CHINOOK) SALMON
Salmon spend about 4 years in Puget Sound
or in the ocean where they feed and grow.
The following long-term (50- to 100-year) population
targets for summer/fall Chinook salmon in WRIA 9 are:
• 17,000 spawning adults annually (lower limit);
• 27,000 spawning adults (midpoint and adopted
target); and
• 37,000 spawning adults (upper limit).
Refinement of these targets is expected to occur as
additional analyses are completed. These targets have
been accepted by the Puget Sound Technical Recovery
Team (TRT) and by the Washington State Department
of Fish and Wildlife (see January 25, 2005 letter in
Appendix A).
Portions of the Middle Green River, shown here at river mile 39, provide
good spawning and rearing habitat.
SPAWNING
King salmon change color as they
swim upstream to the exact same
stream where they were hatched.
After spawning, the salmon die.
Their bodies provide food for animals
and valuable nutrients to the streams.
For context, the current target number for spawning
adult summer/fall Chinook for the Green/Duwamish
River watershed is approximately 9,300 Chinook. Of
this number, 5,800 fish are targeted to spawn in the
river ("escapement"), and 3,500 adult fall Chinook are
intended for broodstock. Broodstock are artificially
spawned at the Soos Creek Salmon Hatchery.
The number of returning fall Chinook to the Green
River varies tremendously year to year. From 1989 to
2001, total returning fall Chinook naturally spawning
in the river ranged from 2,450 to 11,500. Summer/fall
Chinook returning to the hatchery have exceeded
9,000 adults every year since 1995, except for 2000,
when approximately 6,000 returned.
In addition to the numerical target focused on abun-
dance, the recommendations of the Habitat Plan are
intended to improve the three other viable salmonid
population parameters by:
• Increasing productivity (growth rate) of the
population;
• Improving diversity in terms of genetic makeup
and behavioral traits; and
• Improving the spatial structure of the population
to better distribute fish to take advantage of good
habitat and to lower risk from catastrophic events.
Page 1-7
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
This Habitat Plan is the result of a five-year planning
effort supported by the WRIA 9 Steering Committee
and Forum. The Steering Committee is a cooperative
effort with members representing the variety of
perspectives found in the basin, including govern-
ment, business, recreation, agriculture, the environ-
ment, and others. The Forum is the WRIA decision -
making body composed of the 16 local governments in
the WRIA 9 watershed plus Tacoma Public Utilities.
Although the Habitat Plan is focused on future steps, it
is important to acknowledge the dedication and
successes to date in this watershed.
Despite being intensively developed, this watershed
still retains a natural ecosystem worth saving and
improving. It also is reaping the fruits of the millions of
dollars and thousands of hours devoted to salmon
habitat and ecosystem health in recent years. These
commitments range from local grants from the local
King Conservation District to over $7.3 million in
federal and state funds from the Salmon Recovery
Funding Board. A partnership between the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Indian tribes, and local govern-
ments has begun to implement a suite of projects in
the Green/Duwamish Watershed portion of WRIA 9. An
extensive array of farm management practices and
other land use policies, regulations, and programs that
are implemented by all local governments also im-
prove conditions for fish while preserving sustainable
agriculture and urban and rural residential areas. For
example, the development rights for over 13,000 acres
(county -wide) have been acquired through the Farm-
land Preservation Program and are therefore protected
from development. Improved stormwater manage-
ment by cities large and small is contributing to
reduced impacts on streams from development.
NW-T—Acton Agwid.
ter 9.1— N�Entl CO-11.0 n
- Much of the work done to
improve the watershed
ecosystem is listed in the 2002
WRIA 9 Near -Term Action Agenda
and two subsequent annual
progress reports.
Hundreds of acres of high -quality habitat have been
preserved through public purchase and innovative
incentive programs. Growth management has focused
development in the existing urban areas, helping to
keep rural areas rural for the benefit of rural residents
and fish. Meanwhile, countless private landowners
quietly go to the expense and effort of managing their
land to preserve its habitat value. Finally, thousands of
volunteers have donated their labor to plant native
trees and shrubs and control invasive weeds.
Chapter 2, Introduction, provides a brief description of
these and other efforts. A more complete summary is
in the 2002 Near -Term Action Agenda (along with two
annual follow-up progress reports), which was devel-
oped as an interim predecessor to this Habitat Plan.
The many accomplishments to date are a foundation
for the hope that the ambitious recommendations of
this Habitat Plan are accomplished.
The recommendations of this Plan rest on a strong
foundation of scientific assessment and analysis. A
summary of the current scientific understanding of the
watershed is provided in Chapter 4, Scientific Founda-
tion, and Chapter 5, Habitat Management Strategies.
This understanding is based on years of study of the
watershed that culminated in a Strategic Assessment
during 2002-2004 (King County Department of Natural
Resources and Parks et al. 2004). This Strategic Assess-
ment consists of original research to fill in gaps in
understanding identified by previous work. It also
includes analysis that helped make sense of a tremen-
dous amount of technical information and began the
process of translating science into policy.
The scientific work in the Strategic Assessment was
guided by the:
1) Viable Salmonid Population (VSP) framework
(McElhany et al. 2000);
2) Habitat Plan Substantive Scope and Approach,
approved by the Steering Committee in 2002; and
3) Technical guidance document developed by the
Puget Sound Technical Recovery Team (2003) for
integrated salmonid habitat recovery planning.
Page 1-8
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
As the scientific foundation for the Habitat Plan, the
Strategic Assessment includes information on:
• Historical and current habitat conditions;
• Salmonid population conditions;
• Fish utilization, including juvenile migration and
rearing patterns, habitat usage, and habitat
limiting factors; and
• Water quantity and quality.
The WRIA 9 Habitat Limiting Factors and Reconnais-
sance Assessment Report (Kerwin and Nelson (Eds.)
2000) and the State of the Nearshore Ecosystem Report
(Brennan (Ed.) 2001) were used as raw material for
further analysis as part of the Strategic Assessment.
The Strategic Assessment analysis included examining
the functional linkages between habitat conditions
and populations and developing conservation hypoth-
eses. Conservation hypotheses are a "best estimate" of
how improvements in habitat conditions and pro-
cesses will lead to improvements in the four viable
salmon parameters (abundance, productivity, diver-
sity, and spatial structure) that are critical to long-term
survival. The Strategic Assessment also identified
necessary future conditions to support a viable popu-
lation of Chinook salmon. The necessary future
conditions are also essentially hypotheses about what
is thought to be necessary habitat to recover the
Green/Duwamish River Chinook population. The
conservation hypotheses and necessary future condi-
tions were ultimately used to develop habitat manage-
ment strategies for each subwatershed (the watershed
is divided into five subwatersheds [Figure 1-1] for
analytical purposes).
Years of scientific assessment have yielded valuable understanding about
how the marine nearshore, estuarine, and freshwater habitats of the
watershed meet Salmonid needs. This nearshore beach seining on Vashon/
Maury helped determine salmonid presence. May2001 photo.
These scientific products — information on conditions,
conservation hypotheses, necessary future conditions,
and habitat management strategies — have been
essential tools in identifying, refining, reviewing, and
revising the actions recommended in this Plan. They
constitute a logic train (Figure 4-3) that link present
scientific understanding to recommended future
actions.
The results of the Strategic Assessment have made
possible the identification of clear priorities for work
over the next 10 years.
Scientific assessments — summarized in the WRIA 9
Habitat Limiting Factors and Reconnaissance Assess-
ment (Kerwin and Nelson (Eds.) 2000) and WRIA 9
Strategic Assessment (2002-early 2005) — indicate that
there are limiting habitats in the Duwamish Estuary
transition zone; Middle Green, Lower Green,
Duwamish Estuary, and Marine Nearshore
Subwatershed rearing habitats; and Middle Green and
upper Lower Green Subwatersheds spawning habitat.
It also appears that a decline in productivity of the
juvenile life stage undermines the viability of the
population (King County Department of Natural
Resources and Parks et al. 2004).
Based on this understanding, this Habitat Plan adopts
the following as a 10-year strategy (cited as Policy MS1
in Chapter 5, Habitat Management Strategies and
Policies):
The focus of management action (projects and pro-
grams) implementation efforts in this Habitat Plan will
be on the following limiting habitats that exist within
the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound
Watershed:
• Duwamish Estuary transition habitat;
• Middle Green River, Lower Green River,
Duwamish Estuary, and Marine Nearshore rearing
habitat; and
• Middle Green and Lower Green River spawning
habitat.
Page 1-9
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
Transition zone habitat, shown here at the Hamm Creek confluence with
the Duwamish at river mile 5.0, is critical for Chinook juveniles. July 2002
photo.
Because of the importance of the Duwamish transition
zone — where young salmonids make the transition
from being freshwater fish to saltwater fish — and the
negative effect on habitat recovery efforts upstream if a
severe transition zone restriction does exist, 40% of
funding for projects and programs will be focused on
the transition zone. The remaining 60% of funding for
projects and programs will be split between rearing
and spawning limiting habitats. For example, if $100
million became available to implement this Plan, $40
million would be targeted toward rehabilitation of and
increases to transition zone habitat. $60 million would
be targeted toward high priority projects that protect,
restore, rehabilitate, or substitute for rearing and
spawning habitat.
The focus of habitat efforts in these areas will be on
increasing the productivity of the population by
improving the quality and quantity of habitats identi-
fied above.
This strategy is based on current understandings of
how the watershed meets and does not meet the
habitat needs of Chinook salmon. Additional informa-
tion and analysis may lead to changes in how re-
sources are allocated.
Based on the findings of the Strategic Assessment, the
Habitat Plan focuses on actions and policies that
address the following key salmon habitat needs:
Watershed -Wide Needs
• Prevent and reduce armoring of stream banks and
shorelines;
• Promote low impact development such as porous
pavement, bioswales, and clustered development;
• Replace culverts that block fish passage on tribu-
tary streams;
• Protect and improve water quality by focusing on
"nonpoint" pollution that comes from stormwater
runoff from streets, highways, parking lots, roofs,
yards, and cleared lands;
• Allow natural river flows in an unconstrained river
channel where possible; and
• Maintain adequate stream flows.
Upper Green River Subwatershed
• Facilitate Chinook salmon and bull trout access
above Howard Hanson Dam and the Tacoma
Headworks by providing passage upstream for
adults and downstream for the young fish;
■ At river mile 61, the Tacoma Diversion
Dam diverts water to serve customers in Pierce
and southern King County. Three miles
upstream, Howard Hanson Dam holds back
flood waters and stores water for late summer
release. Both dams block upstream fish
passage but beginning in 2007, adult salmon
migrating upstream will be collected at the
Tacoma Diversion Dam. The fish will be
released into the Upper Green River to spawn,
opening up the upper watershed to salmon
for the first time since 1911.
Page 1-10
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
Howard Hanson Dam was not designed
for safe downstream passage by young
salmon. A new fish passage tower will
q gather young salmon and pass them safely
around Howard Hanson Dam. The tower
can pass fish regardless of fluctuating
A _ water levels in the reservoir.
�Srtrof propc er•d Inwer
• Protect and restore riparian habitat along the
Upper Green River mainstem and major tributar-
ies by restoring the riparian corridor, increasing
channel complexity, and decommissioning old
logging roads;
• Remove fish passage barriers such as culverts from
tributary streams; and
• Protect and restore natural sediment movement
by reducing road failures.
Middle Green River Subwatershed
• Protect and restore side channels, off -channel
wetlands, tributary mouths, and pools that
provide shelter and habitat complexity for young
salmon;
• Protect and restore natural sediment movement
by reconnecting sediment sources to the river;
• Protect and restore spawning and rearing habitat
in lower Newaukum and Soos Creeks; and
• Maintain regional groundwater recharge and base
flows to the mainstem Green River through forest
retention and low impact development.
Lower Green River Subwatershed
• Protect and restore side channels, off -channel
wetlands, tributary mouths, and pools that
provide shelter and habitat complexity for young
salmon;
• Protect and restore natural sediment movement
by reconnecting sediment sources to the river;
• Preserve groundwater inflow from the historical
White River channel; and
• Modify the Black River Pump Station to improve
fish passage.
Duwamish Estuary Subwatershed
• Restore vegetated shallow subtidal and intertidal
habitats and brackish marshes by restoring
dredged, armored, and filled areas;
• Increase shallow water and slow water "transition
zone' habitat where salmon transform from
freshwater to salt water fish;
• Improve sediment quality through the Lower
Duwamish Waterway Superfund cleanup;
• Protect and restore water quality through point
and nonpoint pollution source control;
• Restore off -channel refuge habitat and mainstem
pools in Tukwila; and
• Improve natural sediment transport and deposi-
tion processes.
Marine Nearshore Subwatershed
• Protect and restore lagoons, spits, and pocket
estuaries where small streams enter Puget Sound;
• Protect and expand vegetated shallow water
11nearshore" and marsh habitats;
• Protect feeder bluffs that provide sediment
needed for beach nourishment by preventing and,
where possible, removing bulkheads;
• Protect and expand forage fish spawning beaches
used by herring, sand lance, and surf smelt; and
• Improve sediment quality, particularly in Elliott
Bay.
..
-------------------------
The Habitat Plan calls for the creation of off -channel, shallow -water
habitats like the Codiga project in Tukwila. May 2004 photo courtesy of
City of Tukwila.
Page 1-11
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan August 200S
Chapter 7, Proposed Actions and Policies to Achieve a
Viable Salmonid Population, lists the most important
projects and programs to implement over the next 10
years to improve the aquatic ecosystem, thereby
benefiting Chinook salmon, bull trout, and other
salmonids. Of these projects, those that address the
limiting habitats for the Green/Duwamish River
Chinook population are considered of greatest priority
and are listed in Table 8-2 (Chapter 8).
Actions in this Habitat Plan can be divided into two
categories:
Programs: A body of work requiring staffing and/
or funding. In this Plan, programs focus on
stormwater management, stewardship/public
education, internal government practices, and
other governmental and non -governmental
efforts.
Projects: On -the -ground actions to protect,
restore, rehabilitate, or substitute habitat or the
processes that create habitat.
The Plan recommends an array of projects and pro-
grams that watershed partners can strive to carry out
over the next 10 years. These actions will:
• Protect existing processes and habitats that are
working well;
• Restore processes and habitats that can be re-
turned to good conditions;
Heahhy
riparian
habitat
Plants add
structure
RIPARIAN HABITAT-
sal-eed
The transition zone between
plants also
the water where fish live
attratt insects
and upland areas. forfoodand
shade to keep
:: q%:`�, •y yw'
the water cod.
Poor riparian habitat-
Lack of native trees and
shrubs allow the water to
heat up and allow non-native
invasive weeds like
blackberry to take over.
f
1
1
• Rehabilitate damaged processes and habitats that
can be sustained with on -going efforts; and
• Substitute processes and habitats that are lost.
In the first 10 years, the Plan recommends:
• 75 on -the -ground restoration projects;
• 57 habitat protection projects (including 50
habitat protection areas on Vashon/Maury Island
and seven King County -proposed "Last Best Places
Middle Green" acquisitions); and
• 30 programs (16 watershed -wide and 14
subwatershed).
Even more opportunities for citizen stewardship, such as shown here at the
joint CityofAuburn-King (ountyFenster project, will occur under the
Habitat Plan. October1004 photo.
56 of the 75 on -the -ground habitat projects are consid-
ered the highest priority because of their importance
in addressing habitat limiting factors affecting Chi-
nook salmon (Table 8-2).
These recommended actions were identified and
evaluated by people who understand the watershed.
Each project had to pass both a scientific/technical
review and a feasibility review to be included in this
Plan. As with many recommendations in this Plan, it is
expected that these projects will be refined in the years
to come as ever more scientific information becomes
available.
Projects are on -the -ground efforts that move earth and
plant trees, including:
• Excavating shallow water habitat in estuarine and
marine nearshore habitats;
Page 1-12
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
Protect
sediment
sources
Bluff erosion is
natural. Bulkheads
starve beaches of
sediment and damage
beach ecology. Salmon
and other marine
creatures suffer.
Preserving native trees and
shrubs keep erosion rates
at natural levels.
t Overhanging trees keep
the beach healthy for
prey fish that salmon
eat.
Bulkheads
Cut off
sediment
;r
Eroding
beach
• Installation of large woody debris in freshwater
habitats;
• Planting of native vegetation in both marine and
freshwater habitats;
• Control of noxious and invasive weeds throughout
the watershed;
• Levee setbacks on the Green River mainstem;
• Introduction of spawning gravel in the Green River
mainstem;
• Side channel reconnection in freshwater habitats;
and
• Removal of bulkheads or replacement with softer
forms of shoreline protection in marine nearshore
habitats.
Complementing these restoration/rehabilitation/
substitution projects are projects to protect high value
habitat. Depending on the habitat value, location (e.g.,
next to a migrating channel), and interest of the
landowner, these projects will make use of property
acquisition, conservation easements, incentives, and/
or information and education.
The recommended projects in this Plan will comple-
ment on -going and planned habitat activities such as:
• Good stewardship of streams, shorelines, and
uplands by homeowners;
• Implementing farm plans and other conservation
measures by farmers;
• Sustainable forestry practices by small woodlot
owners;
• Use of BuiltGreenTm and other low impact devel-
opment practices by developers;
• Habitat restoration projects organized by non-
profit organizations and carried out by thousands
of volunteers;
• Improved stormwater management by local
governments;
• Sound land use planning and growth manage-
ment by local governments;
• Fish passage facility construction and operation to
the Upper Green River Subwatershed by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the Tacoma Public
Utilities; and
• Many other innovative, sustained efforts by
individuals, groups, businesses, and governments
intended to improve water quality and protect and
restore salmon habitat.
Finally, the Plan includes policies that provide high-
level guidance to activities that directly or indirectly
affect salmon habitat.
These Auburn high school students improved habitat by planting trees at
Whitney Bridge Park at river mile 40.3 on the Green River. October 2004
photo.
Page 1-13
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
Implementation of the priority projects (Table 8-2)
recommended by this Habitat Plan are estimated to
cost from $198 million to $291 million. Implementa-
tion of all projects recommended by this Plan would
cost from $272 to $389 million. Cost estimates for the
policies and programs were not developed.
Chapter 8 of this Plan provides a strategy for imple-
menting this Plan's recommendations, including
funding scenarios. Additionally, there is a Puget
Sound -wide effort being undertaken by Shared Strat-
egy to develop a finance plan for implementing the
Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan. Preliminary
approaches of the Puget Sound -wide effort include a
mix of federal, state, and local funding sources to pay
for implementation.
The expenditure of these substantial sums, fortunately,
will benefit far more than the silver fish. WRIA 9
ecosystems produce $1.7-6.3 billion of value in goods
and services every year for individuals, communities,
businesses, and governments within WRIA 9. The value
of salmon restoration and healthy ecosystems to future
generations is likely to be even greater as the popula-
tion grows and the amount of habitat is reduced (Asia -
Pacific Environmental Exchange 2005). Expenditures
on the recommendations of the Habitat Plan will help
secure the current stream of goods and services and
may increase their value.
Effective and efficient recovery of Puget Sound Chi-
nook populations depends on addressing the causes of
salmonid decline including:
• Habitat degradation;
• Hatchery practices; and
• Harvest management.
The Habitat Plan currently does not address hatchery
and harvest practices because these are the responsi-
bility of the co -managers (Treaty Tribes and the
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife). As
of mid-2005, the WRIA 9 partners were informed that
the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife
had committed to lead the effort to complete the
integration of habitat, hatchery, and harvest recovery
efforts at both the watershed level and at the Puget
Sound regional level.
Following this so-called "H-integration" effort, it may
be necessary to review elements of this Plan to deter-
mine whether and how decisions made regarding
hatchery and harvest practices affect the habitat -
focused recommendations of this Plan.
In addition to addressing the habitat needs of Chinook,
this Habitat Plan will also provide habitat improve-
ments for bull trout, listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service as threatened in November 1999. The ecosys-
tem approach - with a focus on habitats and the
processes that create those habitats - is intended to
benefit all salmonid species.
Very little is known about bull trout presence and use
of habitats in WRIA 9 but Appendix K of Volume II
provides a matrix showing how the recommendations
in this Plan address the bull trout recovery actions
listed in the Draft Recovery Plan for the Coastal -Puget
Sound District Population Segment of Bull Trout (U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service 2005).
Page 1-14
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan- -August 2005
Successful implementation of the Habitat Plan actions
depends on monitoring and adaptive management.
Monitoring of projects will occur at multiple levels.
Implementation monitoring will tell us which projects
have been carried out. Effectiveness monitoring will
determine whether the habitat objectives of the project
have been achieved. Finally, validation monitoring will
confirm whether the actions of this Plan are achieving
the desired changes in the population parameters of
abundance, productivity, diversity, and spatial struc-
ture. Worthwhile monitoring is in turn informed at the
outset by adaptive management.
Adaptive management is a systematic process for
continually improving management policies and
practices by learning from the outcomes of actions.
Adaptive management embodies a simple imperative:
policies are experiments - learn from them. Adaptive
management recognizes that uncertainty and unex-
pected changes are inherent in managing complex
ecological systems. Adaptive management relies on a
problem -solving approach to address this uncertainty
through six steps: (1) assessment, (2) design, (3)
implementation, (4) monitoring, (5) evaluation, and
(6) adjustment. The actions recommended in this Plan
and the success of salmon restoration within the
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed
depend on a rigorous monitoring and adaptive man-
agement program.
Together, monitoring and adaptive management will
provide a stream of information and insight that can
inform course corrections as the recommendations of
this Plan are implemented.
Although the bulk of the recommendations in this
Habitat Plan are likely to be carried out through a
partnership of governments, the long-term health of
the watershed in terms important to both people and
fish will be influenced greatly by those who call it
home.
In daily life, we who share this watershed have an
impact on its health. Daily practices in the home, in
the yard, and with our cars are magnified by our
numbers and concentrated by water. Every volunteer
who picks up a shovel to control invasive weeds or
plant native trees is acting for a better watershed.
Ultimately a healthy watershed depends on the actions
of all of us in our roles as consumers, business people,
students, members of myriad organizations, and
citizens in a community.
Consequently, this Plan recommends policies and
programs to promote ever greater understanding and
action by all of us. You can start today by visiting the
watershed website — http: / /dnr.metrokc.gov/Wrias/9/
index.htm — which contains abundant tips and links
for salmon -friendly living.
The future of salmon is in our hands. Juvenile salmonid in the Duwamish.
May 2005 photo.
Page 1-15
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
The publication of this Salmon Habitat Plan com-
mences the 90 day review period by the WRIA 9 Forum
of Local Governments. The Forum may approve the
Plan or remand it back to the Steering Committee for
further deliberation. However, the Forum cannot make
changes to the Plan. Following adoption of the Plan by
the Forum, a minimum of five cities representing at
least 70% of the population within the watershed must
ratify the Plan before their respective legislative bodies.
Only then will the Habitat Plan truly become final.
This Habitat Plan also will be included as a chapter in
the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Plan produced
through the Puget Sound Shared Strategy.
Within a year of Plan ratification, we will need to
develop a detailed implementation plan and begin to
pursue funding. We also need to arrive at agreements
among all of the WRIA 9 participating jurisdictions on
how to fund and implement the Plan. As a watershed,
what assurances can we make and what risks are we
willing to take are fundamental questions that need to
be answered.
In the long term, use of the action evaluation tools and
the monitoring and adaptive management approach
described in this Plan will allow local governments to
continue to use the habitat planning process to meld
Plan recommendations with their local regulations,
policies, plans, and programs.
A lot of hard work lies ahead. Progress to date, how-
ever, and the love that so many people have for the
place we call home offers tremendous hope. We know
that it is not our generation alone that thrills to the
sight of the mighty Chinook salmon returning to the
Green/Duwamish River after years in the ocean. It is
not just those of us alive now who enjoy the many
benefits of a healthy watershed. Future generations
depend on us to be good stewards and to recognize
that clean water and healthy habitat are good for
people and are good for fish.
Let's get to work "making our watershed fit for a King."
Page 1-76
Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Salmon Habitat Plan —August 2005
A�7-T 'WF-0 BY
CbTV COUNCIL
Date
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
COMMITTEE REPORT
October 17, 2005
2006 Legislative Priorities
(October 10, 2005)
The Committee of the Whole concurs with the recommendation of the Administration to
adopt the 2006 Legislative Priorities as presented. Topics include municipal finance,
transportation funding, economic development and annexation tools, land use, law
enforcement, and the Growth Management Act. The Council further authorizes the
Administration to work with other agencies and the Legislature regarding these issues and
initiatives on its behalf.
Terri Brier ;, Council President
cc: 4ey eovingten
'k4m4triSftMtM
' 09
Alec Pie{sc{-
Legislative Priorities 2006 COW report.doc\ rev 01/02 bh
4dopled /0-/7,OS
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. J776
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
RATIFYING THE "WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA) 9
SALMON HABITAT PLAN, MAKING OUR WATERSHED FIT FOR A
KING."
WHEREAS, in March 1999, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA) Fisheries listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon evolutionary significant unit as a
threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA); and
WHEREAS, in November 1999, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
listed the Puget Sound bull trout distinct population segment as a threatened species under the
ESA; and
WHEREAS, significant areas of the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound
Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9, are designated by the federal government as
critical salmon habitat; and
WHEREAS, coordination and cooperation among federal, state, and local agencies,
tribes, businesses, non -governmental organizations, landowners, citizens, and other interests are
essential to plan for and implement a salmon recovery plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Renton supports cooperation at the WRIA level to set common
priorities for actions among partners, efficient use of resources and investments, and distribution
of responsibility for actions and expenditures;
WHEREAS, 17 local governments in WRIA 9 entered into an inter -local agreement in
2001 to jointly fund development of the Greend) wamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed,
RESOLUTION NO.
Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, Making our Watershed Fit for a King,
published August 10, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, developed by a steering committee
comprised of multiple interests, includes a wide variety of actions that focus on habitat recovery
for Chinook salmon, bull trout, and other salmonids for the next 10 years and prioritizes them to
guide efforts to recover the Green River Chinook salmon population; and
WHEREAS, the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan is based upon a sound scientific
foundation, and includes an adaptive management approach and funding strategy for
implementation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The City of Renton hereby ratifies the GreenlDuwamish and
Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan,
Making our Watershed Fit for a King, dated August 2005. This resolution does not obligate the
City of Renton Council to future appropriations beyond current authority.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
day of , 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005.
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
FA
RESOLUTION NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RES. 113 6:10/05/05 : ma
4dded and
4do
,Okd ia-o-aoos
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 377y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, STATING ITS OPPOSITION TO WASHINGTON
INITIATIVE 912, WHICH WOULD REPEAL THE 9 1/2 CENT MOTOR
VEHICLE FUEL TAX (GAS TAX) RATE INCREASE, ENACTED BY
THE WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURE DURING THE 2005
LEGISLATIVE SESSION, FOR STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION AND
PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES, AND URGING VOTERS TO VOTE "NO"
ON THIS INITIATIVE ON NOVEMBER S, 2005.
WHEREAS, throughout the Puget Sound area, and in Renton in particular, congestion is
a serious public safety, economic and quality -of -life problem; and
WHEREAS, Interstate 405 and State Routes 167, 169, 515, and 900 all pass through
Renton, bringing more than 350,000 vehicles a day through the City; and
WHEREAS, many organizations, including the Washington Alliance for a Competitive
Economy, the Blue Ribbon Commission on Transportation, and former Governor Locke's
Competitiveness Council, have all identified transportation as a critical issue for Washington state,
and have called for the state to increase its investment in transportation infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, in response to this need, the Washington State Legislature took an
important step forward and enacted the 2005 Transportation Partnership Funding Package, which
included a 9 1/2 cent per gallon motor vehicle fuel tax (gas tax) rate increase, of which three cents
took effect in July, 2005, and additional increases that would take effect over the next three years;
and
WHEREAS, Renton has a pressing need for highway and local road projects, and
congestion relief will only occur by completing roadway expansion; and
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, according to the Secretary of State, the gas tax increase would provide $4.4
billion plus $1 billion in proposed bond proceeds for 265 transportation projects throughout the
state. Additionally, this plan distributes $562 million for improvements to the arterial streets and
other transportation infrastructure managed by local governments; and
WHEREAS, Washington Initiative 912 (I-912), which would repeal the gas tax increase
enacted by the Washington State Legislature, has been certified for the November 8, 2005
General Election ballot; and
WHEREAS, approval of I-912 would end funding from the gas tax increase for
scheduled projects vital to the well-being of Renton citizens and businesses, including funding for
the Small City Pavement program, Safe Routes to Schools program, Pedestrian and Bicycle
Safety program, and the Freight Mobility Safety Investment Board; and
WHEREAS, in and around Renton, the gas tax increase would have provided funding for
further improvements to 1405, including the construction of an additional northbound lane from
167 to Maple Valley Highway, construction of one northbound and one southbound lane from NE
44th Street to 112th Ave SE, the addition of a northbound and southbound lane from Interstate 5
to State Route 181, construction of a new on -ramp to the north and off -ramp from the north at
State Route 515, and the construction of an additional southbound lane from I-405 to 41 st Street,
and without this funding, these project will be delayed, and possibly not built; and
WHEREAS, locally, the estimated new fuel tax revenue to the City of Renton over six
years is approximately $1.3 million and would provide partial funding to the SW 27th Street
project, improvements to Hardie Avenue SW and Rainier Avenue South, and improvements along
the NE 3rd and NE 4th Corridor; and
2
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, the people of Renton have repeatedly expressed support for funding local
transportation improvements; and
WHEREAS, approval of I-912 would negatively affect all corners of the state of
Washington, reducing or eliminating funding for over 265 transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, approval of 1-912 would have an enormous adverse economic impact on the
state of Washington by eliminating, or preventing the creation of, thousands of direct and indirect
jobs associated with transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, approval of I-912 would seriously harm the state of Washington's ability to
maintain its aging transportation infrastructure, putting at risk the health and safety of millions of
residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The above findings are true and correct in all respects.
SECTION H. The City Council declares its opposition to Washington Initiative
912, and urges voters to vote "no" on the initiative at the November 8, 2005 General Election.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 112005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
3
RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVED BY TBE MAYOR this day of , 2005.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
RE S .113 7 :10/ 17/05 : ma
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
4
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (PARK
TERRACE — EXPANDED ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04-002)
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A 14.120 as amended, a petition in writing
requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed
to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about September 16,
2004; and
WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City
of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such
proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120, and upon
public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to
assume the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the
territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as
it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and
WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments examined and verified the
signatures on the petition for annexation and determined signatures represent acreage, as provided
by law, in excess of sixty percent (60%) of the area to be annexed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, after due notice and publication, held a public hearing on
the 601/o Direct Petition and possible future zoning for the initial 7,65-acre annexation site on
1
ORDINANCE NO.
December 20, 2004, and at that time accepted the 60% Direct Petition and authorized the sending
of the "Notice of Intention" to the Boundary Review Board for King County; and
WHEREAS, during the Boundary Review Board's mandatory 45-day review period the
City "invoked" the Boundary Review Board's jurisdiction by letter on March 22, 2005, requesting
the expansion of the initial annexation by some 72.35 acres; and
WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board for King County, after duly publishing and
posting the expanded area, held a public hearing in Renton on May 24, 2005, to consider
Renton's request to expand the boundaries of the initial 7.65-acre annexation site;
and
WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board for King County issued its proceedings and
hearing decision on July 14, 2005, expanding the boundaries of the Park Terrace Annexation to
80.0 acres; and
WHEREAS, no appeals of the Boundary Review Board's decision were filed with King
County Superior Court within 30 days of its decision; and
WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said
expanded annexation area to the City of Renton; and
WHEREAS, the City Council fixed September 12, 2005, and October 3, 2005, as the
time and place for public hearings in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington,
FA
ORDINANCE NO.
upon the expanded area and future zoning for it, and notice thereof having been given as provided
by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council continued the October 3, 2005, public hearing until
October 17, 2005, more than 30 days after its first public hearing; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices, public hearings having been held at the time and
place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the
annexation and having further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law
applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and
WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of
Intention" approved as modified on July 16, 2005; and
R-10;
WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently prezoning the annexation site R-8 and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASMNGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition
method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. It is
further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and
territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being
contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of Renton, and
such annexation to be effective after the approval, passage, and publication of this Ordinance; and
3
ORDINANCE NO.
on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be
subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being
described as follows:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
[Said property, approximately 80 acres, is generally located south, east, and north
of existing City of Renton boundaries and more specifically, east of Anacortes
Avenue NE, if extended, south of SE 112'b Street, if extended, north of SE 122nd
Street, if extended, and west of Hoquiam Avenue NE (144`h Avenue SE), if
extended, as shown on Exhibit "A".]
The owners -petitioners of the property shall assume the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of
the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains to the property, and the
property is subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code.
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
thirty days after its publication.
A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of
Washington, and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 2005.
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
rd
ORDINANCE NO.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1212:10/7/05:ma
EXHIBIT A
PARK TERRACE ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying northerly and easterly of
the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 3553;
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the
southeast quarter of said Section 10, lying westerly and southerly of the existing City
Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 5097, EXCEPT the south 30 feet thereof;
and
TOGETHER WITH the south 165 feet of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of
the southeast quarter of said Section 10, EXCEPT the west 30 feet of the south 30 feet
thereof, and
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the west half (1/2) of the southwest quarter of the
northeast quarter of said Section 10, lying westerly of the existing City Limits of Renton
as annexed by Ordinance No. 5097, and lying southerly and westerly of the existing City
Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215; and
TOGETHER WITH that portion of the east half (1/2) of the northwest quarter of said
Section 10, lying easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance
No. 2000, No. 5012, No. 2210, No. 4383 and No. 3058, lying westerly of the existing
City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 2945, and lying southerly and
westerly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215.
Ud
DI
[IIIID -`
ULU -�
1---- -- - _ _ _ -
Park Terrace Annexation 0 600 1200
Figure 1: Vicinity Map —
Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 1 : 7200
Alen Rctsch. Adimnrsuator r Proposed Annexation Area
��+.•`/� G net Ros:uto
FNT�' ' A°�n" '00% r Proposed Hoquiam Annexation Area
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-4
(URBAN RESIDENTIAL 4 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING), R
6 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL 6 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY), AND R 8
(URBAN RESIDENTIAL 8 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY) TO R-8
(RESIDENTIAL 8 DU/AC; EIGHT DWELLING UNITS PER NET ACRE)
(PARK TERRACE — EXPANDED ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04-002).
WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards,
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in
conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of
Renton; and
WHEREAS, property owners within the original annexation area petitioned the City of
Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning;
WHEREAS, the original annexation area having been expanded by the Boundary Review
Board for King County on or about July 15, 2005, from 7.65 acres to approximately 80 acres, the
latter which had previously not been considered for rezoning;
WHEREAS, the City having now held two public hearings to consider zoning for the
expanded area, the first hearing on zoning being held on September 12, 2005, and the second
hearing being held on October 3, 2005, and continued to October 17, 2005, and said zoning being
in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly
1
ORDINANCE NO.
considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support
thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
zoned to R-8, to wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
[Said property, approximately 63.0 acres, is generally located south of SE 112t'
Street, if extended, and east of Anacortes Avenue NE (130h Ave SE), if extended,
north of SE 122d Street, if extended, and west of 144`h Avenue SE, if extended.
Said property includes Tracts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, V11, VIII, and IX, as shown as a
part of this exhibit.]
The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to
evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change
the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning.
SECTION IL This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval,
and thirty days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12005.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1211:10/7/05:ma
3
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
EXHIBIT A
TRACT I — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The west half (1/2) of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County,
Washington; EXCEPT that portion lying westerly and southerly of the existing City
Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No.5012; EXCEPT the west half of the north
half of the north half of said subdivision; and EXCEPT the north 230 feet of the East half
of said subdivision; TOGETHER WITH the south 125 feet of the west 142.2 feet of said
north 230 feet of the East half of said subdivision;
EXCEPT roads.
TRACT II — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County,
Washington;
EXCEPT roads.
TRACT III — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County,
Washington;
EXCEPT roads.
TRACT IV — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the south half (1/2) of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of
Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King
County, Washington, lying easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by
Ordinance No. 3058;
EXCEPT roads.
TRACT V — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 10, Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, lying
northerly and easterly of the existing City Limits of Renton as annexed by Ordinance No.
3553;
EXCEPT roads.
TRACT VI — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of
Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King
County, Washington, lying westerly and southerly of the existing City Limits of Renton
as annexed by Ordinance No. 4215;
EXCEPT roads.
TRACT VII — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 10,
Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County,
Washington;
TOGETHER WITH the north half (1/2) of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter
of the southeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the
City of Renton, King County, Washington;
EXCEPT roads.
TRACT VIII — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The south half (1/2) of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast
quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton,
King County, Washington;
EXCEPT roads.
TRACT IX — LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The south 165 feet of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast
quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton,
King County, Washington.
EXCEPT roads.
71
_?—l'
.''; ' �_
fs
A
� t
Park Terrace
1.8 zDning Map
Annexation
Lk-) &TIllem. A
0."0 .+lr. htKct� �,1��ruar•>n
♦
23 sweritf D,�
TT
R
0 6W 1200
1 --7200
R-8
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R-6
(URBAN RESIDENTIAL 6 DU PER ACRE, KING COUNTY ZONING) TO
R-10 (RESIDENTIAL 10 DU/AC; TEN DWELLING UNITS PER NET
ACRE) (PARK TERRACE — EXPANDED ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04-
002).
WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards,
of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in
conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of
Renton; and
WHEREAS, property owners within the original annexation area petitioned the City of
Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning;
WHEREAS, the original annexation area having been expanded by the Boundary Review
Board for King County on or about July 15, 2005, from 7.65 acres to approximately 80 acres, the
latter which had previously not been considered for rezoning;
WHEREAS, the City having held two public hearings to consider zoning for the
expanded area, the first hearing on zoning being held on September 12, 2005 and the second
hearing being held on October 3, 2005, and continued to October 17, 2005, and said zoning being
in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly
1
ORDINANCE NO.
considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support
thereof or in opposition thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby
zoned to R-8, to wit:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein.
[Said property, approximately 3.4 acres, is located generally south of SE 112t`
Street, if extended east of Anacortes Avenue NE (136 h Avenue SE), if extended
north of SE 113 Street, if extended, and west of Duvall Avenue NE (138
Avenue SE), if extended. Said property includes Tract I, as shown as a part of this
exhibit.]
The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to
evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to change
the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning.
SECTION II. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval,
and thirty days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of 12005.
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1213:10/7/05:ma
EXHIBIT A
TRACT I - LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of the northwest
quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton,
King County, Washington;
TOGETHER WITH the north 230 feet of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of
the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of said Section 10; EXCEPT the south 125
feet of the west 142.5 feet thereof;
EXCEPT roads.
- i JL 14TI
LLJ
---
ao
T St
T
_ � - - -
--
t
NE 8th St
f -
CN
- - E 6th St
- < z—
LF6-Ell
Park Terrace Annexation 0 600 1200
10 Zoning Map
1� �{ Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning 1 : 7200
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
G. Del Rosario R-10 Zone
c�NTOZ 23 September 2005
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
VACATING A PORTION OF LYONS AVENUE NE, LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 144 FEET SOUTH OF NE 4TH STREET, ON THE
WESTERLY HALF OF THE ROAD, FOR A DISTANCE OF
APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET. (STEVE BECK & CORE DESIGN
[BALES] VAC 04-002).
WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of Lyons Avenue NE,
located approximately 144 feet south of NE 4`h Street, on the westerly half of the road, was
filed with the City Clerk on June 15, 2004, and that petition was signed by the owners
representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to
be vacated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3702, passed on July 26, 2004, set
August 23, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time
and place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of
this hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in
favor or in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and
arguments presented to it; and
WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has
considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public
benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described portion of Lyons Avenue NE, to wit:
1
ORDINANCE NO.
A portion of Lyons Avenue NE, located approximately 144 feet south of NE
4`h Street, on the westerly half of the road, for a distance of approximately 100
feet, described more particularly in Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and
made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein,
be and the same is hereby vacated.
SECTION U. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $13,100 (Thirteen
Thousand, One Hundred Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, which has been paid to the City.
SECTION M. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections,
and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1203:10/4/05:ma
2
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
2005
2005.
EXHIBIT A
CORE DESIGN, INC.
BELLEVUE WA 98007
Core Project No: 02087
4/ 16/04
Legal Description — Right -of -Way Vacation
That portion of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 15, Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington described
as follows:
COMMENCING at the northwest corner of Morgan Place II, according to the Short Plat
thereof recorded in Volume 152 of Plats, pages 248 and 248B under Recording No.
20020607900006, records of said county; thence S00°21'l3"W, along the west line of
said Short Plat and the east right-of-way margin of Lyons Avenue NE as established by
City of Renton Ordinance No. 4958, recorded under Recording No. 20020404000988,
records of said county, 144.61 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein
described tract; thence continuing S00°21' 13", along said west line and east margin
103.52 feet to the southwesterly comer of said Short Plat; thence N65'01'55"W, along
the northwesterly prolongation of the southerly line of said Short Plat 33.00 feet to the
east line of Tract 2, Black Loam five acre Tracts, according to the Plat thereof recorded in
Volume 12 of Plats, page 101, records of said county and the west right-of-way margin of
said Lyons Avenue NE; thence N00°21'l3"E, along the east line of said Tract 2 and west
margin 90.45 feet to the north line of the south half of said Tract 2; thence S88021'11"E,
along the easterly prolongation of said north line, 30.01 feet; to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Contains 2,909 -+ square feet (0.0668 f acres)
VON
5- —� —
'�--- 1981.92
N.E 41H ST.
FOUND 3" BRASS
SURFACE DISC
WITH PUNCH
TRACT 2
BLACK LOAM FIVE ACRE
TRACTS, VOL 12, PG. 101
N. LINE, S. 1/2 TRACT 2 N88
AREA OF RIGHT OF -
WAY TO BE VACATED
EXHIBIT B
N88'21 ' 16 "W
2642.56 MEA. (2647.0 PLAT) -JO 11
�0 660.64 15 14
� , (&E. 128TH ST.)
I'll -WI
ULU. NU. ZUUZIUU9UOZ/54
�r
MORGAN PLACE it
VOL 152, PG'S-
248-2486,
REC. NO.
20020607900006
1 FOUND 3" BRASS
- SURFACE DISK STAMPED
"KING COUNTY MON-
W/PUNCH RENTON
CONTROL MON_ NO.
1852
2
I
ti
N
o �
3 G/
I
v
SCALE. 1 " = 60
0 30 60
AMBER LANE PAGE v v
RIGHT OF WAY VACATION
1OF1 1.
EXHIBIT y�C of rAde r
O
Dcc^' , N'mfi:.pJ� 98007
� � DESIGN 425.88578n Fa c (25.885I963
0 ----t
ANAL LAB
ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVEYING
S33>IHBS- 4 29 06
JOB NO_ 02087
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
VACATING A PORTION OF N. 14TH STREET EAST OF LAKE
WASHINGTON BLVD. N. AND GENE COULON BEACH PARK (POOL
BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, L.L.C., PETITIONERS; VAC-05-001).
WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of N. 10 Street east of Lake
Washington Blvd. N. and Gene Coulon Beach Park, was filed with the City Clerk on
January 24, 2005, and that petition was signed by the owners representing more than two-
thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to be vacated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3740, passed on March 7, 2005, set
April 4"', 2005, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and
place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this
hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or
in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and
arguments presented to it; and
WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has
considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the public
benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this vacation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. The following described portion of N. 14'h Street, to wit:
A portion of N. 14°i Street east of Lake Washington Blvd. N. and Gene
Coulon Beach Park, described more particularly in Exhibits "A" and `B"
attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein,
be and the same is hereby vacated.
1
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION U. The City Council hereby elects to charge a fee of $21,285 (Twenty -
One Thousand, Two Hundred and Eighty -Five Dollars) to the petitioner -owners, which has been
paid to the City.
SECTION M. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections,
and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of 2005
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1205:10/4/05:ma
2
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
2005.
Exhibit A
Legal Description — Street Vacation (Portion of North 14th Street):
The southerly 30 feet of the 60-foot right-of-way delineated as Morgan Avenue in C.D.
Hillman's Lake Washington Garden of Eden Division 5, according to the plat thereof recorded in
Volume 11 of Plats, Page 83, Records of King County, Washington, lying westerly of State
Highway 405 and easterly of Lake Washington Boulevard North.
Situate in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 23 North,
Range 5 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington.
I
EXHIBIT B
Vicinity Map
Street Vacation VAC-05-001
Petitioner: Pool Brothers Construction LLC40
Gene Coulon
Beach Park
N. 14th St.
Vacation Request
Vicinity Map
0 200 400
1:2400
♦nTechnical Services
♦ Planning(Building/PubUc York.
K. McFarland
Feb. 25. 2005
I-405
j Sf� 0. n4' lead rn9 V,
Qdop�-Ion
M- l 7-D.'
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 6-16-q
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
REPEALING SECTION 1-3-2.C.1 OF CHAPTER 3, REMEDIES AND
PENALTIES, OF TITLE I (ADMINISTRATIVE); AND AMENDING
CHAPTERS 4-2 THROUGH 4-7, 4-9, AND 4-10 OF TITLE IV
(DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS); CHAPTER 5-13 OF TITLE V
(FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS); AND CHAPTERS 9-10, 9-
13, AND 9-15 OF TITLE IX (PUBLIC WAYS AND PROPERTY) OF
ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY
CLARIFYING THE PENALTY PROVISIONS FOR VIOLATIONS OF
CITY CODE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 1-3-2.C.1 of Chapter 3, Remedies and Penalties, of Title I
(Administrative) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of
Renton, Washington" is hereby repealed.
SECTION II. Section 4-2-050.A of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. CATEGORIES OF USES ESTABLISHED:
This Section establishes permitted, conditional, accessory and prohibited uses, by zone,
for all properties within the Renton City Limits. All uses in a given zone are one of six (6) types:
PERMITTED USES: Land uses allowed outright within a zone.
CONDITIONAL USES (ADMINISTRATIVE): Land uses which may be permitted
within a zoning district following review by the Development Services Division Director to
1
ORDINANCE NO.
establish conditions mitigating impacts of the use and to assure compatibility with other uses in
the district.
CONDITIONAL USES (HEARING EXAMINER): Uses with special characteristics that
may not generally be appropriate within a zoning district, but may be permitted subject to review
by the Hearing Examiner to establish conditions to protect public health, safety and welfare.
ACCESSORY USES: Uses customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use
and typically located upon the same lot occupied by the principal use. Some accessory uses are
specifically listed, particularly where a use is only allowed in an accessory form, whereas other
accessory uses are determined by the Development Services Division on a case by case basis per
RMC 4-2-050.C.4 and C.6, Accessory Use Interpretations and Unclassified Uses.
PROHIBITED USES: Any use which is not specifically enumerated or interpreted by the
City as allowable in that district. Any use not specifically listed as a permitted, conditional, or
accessory use is prohibited, except those uses determined to be unclassified and permitted by the
Development Services Division Director pursuant to RMC 4-2-040.C.6. Any prohibited use is
illegal and is a misdemeanor punishable under RMC 1-3-1.
UNCLASSIFIED USE: A use which does not appear in a list of permitted, conditionally
permitted, or accessory uses, but which is interpreted by the Development Services Division
Director as similar to a listed permitted, conditionally permitted or accessory use, and not
otherwise prohibited, pursuant to RMC 4-2-050.C.6, Unclassified Uses.
SECTION III. Section 4-2-140 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-2-140 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
2
ORDINANCE NO.
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 2 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION IV. Section 4-3-010.13 of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
D. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Violation of this Section on Adult Retail and Entertainment Regulations is declared to be
a public nuisance per se, which may be abated by the City by way of civil abatement procedures,
RMC 1-3-3, or Civil Penalties RMC 1-3-2, or both, and not by criminal prosecution.
SECTION V. Section 4-3-090.0 of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
0. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 3 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION VI.
Section 4-3-1203 of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 3 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
3
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION VII. Section 4-4-050.0 of Chapter 3, Environmental Regulations and
Overlay Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code
of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES:
Any person in violation of this Section shall be informed in writing of the violation and
shall be given fourteen (14) days to comply with this Section. Following this action, if a
subsequent garage sale is conducted in violation of this Section, each day the sale is conducted
shall be considered a separate violation and shall be subject to the following penalty.
Any person conducting any "garage sale" as defined herein in RMC 4-11-070 without
being properly licensed therefore or who shall violate any of the other terms and regulations of
this Section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION VIII. Section 4-4-060.S of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
S. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 4 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION IX. Section 4-4-100.0 of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
U. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 4 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
4
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION X. Section 4-4-150 of Chapter 4, City -Wide Property Development
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-4-150 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 4 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XI. Section 4-5-050.D.2 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Violations and Penalties: Section 113 of the International Building Code (relating
to Violations and Penalties) is hereby amended by substituting in its stead the following
language: Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section are misdemeanors subject to
Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XII.
Section 4-5-055.B of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. APPLICABILITY:
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter,
repair, move, improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building
or structure in the City, or cause or permit the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of any
of the provisions of this Code. Unless otherwise specified, violations of this Section are
misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
5
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XIII. Section 4-5-070.C.13 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
13. Notice of Violation — Chapter 1, Section 109.2 of the International Fire Code,
2003 Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows:
109.2 Notice of violation. When the fire code official finds a building, premises, vehicle,
storage facility or outdoor area that is in violation of this code, the fire code official is authorized
to prepare a written notice of violation describing the conditions deemed unsafe and, when
compliance is not immediate, specifying a time for re -inspection. Whenever the Fire Department
has given proper notification of a violation which required reinspection and thirty (30) days have
expired with such condition or violation still in existence, a second re -inspection will be
required. Any re -inspection after the original thirty (30) day period of time shall be done only
upon the payment of a re -inspection fee as specified in RMC 4-1-150, Fire Prevention Fees, to be
assessed against the person owning, operating or occupying the building or premises wherein the
violation exists. This re -inspection fee must be paid within ten days of the notice for the re -
inspection. However, any building owner, operator or occupant, upon a reasonable request to the
Fire Code Official, may obtain an extension of said thirty (30) day period for a reasonable period
to be established by the Fire Code Official to allow such time for compliance. The request for an
extension must be received by the fire department prior to the expiration of the original re -
inspection date.
SECTION XIV. Sections 4-5-070.C.16 and 17 of Chapter 5, Building and
Fire Prevention Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260
3
ORDINANCE NO.
entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" are hereby amended to
read as follows:
16. Violation Penalties — Chapter 1, Section 109.3 of the International Fire Code 2003
Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 109.3 Violation penalties. Persons who shall violate a provision of this code or
shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair
or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the fire code
official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of this code, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and subject to the penalties of RMC 1-3-1 except for those provisions adopted in
RMC 4-5-070.C.69. Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be
deemed a separate offense.
17. Failure to Comply — Chapter 1, Section 111.4 of the International Fire Code, 2003
Edition, is hereby amended to read as follows:
111.4 Failure to Comply. Any person who shall continue any work after having been
served with a stop work order, except such work as that person is directed to perform to remove
a violation or unsafe condition, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XV. Section 4-5-070.D.20 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
20. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Section 4-5-070.13 of Title 4 RMC are
misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC. Each day upon which a violation occurs or
continues constitutes a separate offense.
7
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XVI.
Section 4-5-100.0 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
C. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
The first paragraph of Section 108.4 of the IFGC, relating to violations and penalties, is
amended by substituting in its stead the following language: Unless otherwise specified,
violations of this section are misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XVII. Section 4-5-140 of Chapter 5, Building and Fire Prevention
Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-5-140 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 5 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XVIII. Section 4-6-030.N of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
N. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section are misdemeanors subject to
Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XIX. Section 4-6-070.0 of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
U. VIOLATIONS OF THIS SECTION AND PENALTIES:
ORDINANCE NO.
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 6 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XX. Section 4-6-110 of Chapter 6, Street and Utility Standards, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-6-110 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 6 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXI. Section 4-7-250 of Chapter 7, Subdivision Regulations, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-7-250 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 7 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXII.
Section 4-9-040.I of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
I. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXIII.
Section 4-9-050.E of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORDINANCE NO.
E. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXIV. Section 4-9-080.G.2 of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXV. Section 4-9-100.I.3 of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
3. Violations of this Chapter and Penalties: Notwithstanding the revocation powers
of the Finance and Information Services Director, and unless otherwise specified, violations of
this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXVI. Section 4-9-110.J.2 of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
2. Misdemeanor: In addition to subsection J1 of this Section, any person, firm or
corporation violating any of the provisions of this Section shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a
misdemeanor subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC, and each such person, firm or corporation shall be
deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any
violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter is committed, continued or permitted.
10
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XXVII. Section 4-9-150.R of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
R. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXVIII.
Section 4-9-170.E of Chapter 9, Permits — Specific, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
E. VIOLATION OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Construction without Permit Considered Public Nuisance: All street railways, telegraph
lines, telephone lines, electric light lines, gas mains or underground conduits for use of any
public utility company and all rails, ties, planks, posts, wires or other structures, apparatus or
material built, constructed or placed in any street, avenue or alley of the City without a permit
having first been issued therefore in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter shall
constitute a public nuisance and shall be abated in the manner provided by the City law of the
City. Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXIX. Section 4-9-190.P.1 of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of
Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
1. VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
11
ORDINANCE NO.
Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXX. Section 4-9-195.F of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
F. Unless otherwise specified, violations of this section of Title 4 RMC are
misdemeanors subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXI. Section 4-9-260 of Chapter 9, Permits - Specific, of Title
IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-9-260 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 9 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXII. Section 4-10-100 of Chapter 10, Legal Nonconforming Structures,
Uses and Lots, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of
General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
4-10-100 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 10 of Title 4 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXIII. Section 5-13-19 of Chapter 13, Public Dances and Dance Halls, of
Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
5-13-19 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
12
ORDINANCE NO.
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 13 of Title 5 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXIV. Section 9-10-12 of Chapter 10, Street Excavations, of Title
IX (Public Ways and Property) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
9-10-12 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES:
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to construct, alter, repair, remove
or improve any facility located on public right-of-way without the required permits or
authorization of the Public Works Director or his duly authorized representative. Unless
otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 10 of Title 9 RMC are misdemeanors subject to
Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXV. Section 9-13-2 of Chapter 13, Trees and Shrubbery, of Title
IX (Public Ways and Property) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of
the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
9-13-2 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 13 of Title 9 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
SECTION XXXVI.
Section 9-15-6 of Chapter 15, Weeds and Noxious Matter,
of Title IX (Public Ways and Property) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
9-15-6 VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER AND PENALTIES:
Unless otherwise specified, violations of Chapter 15 of Title 9 RMC are misdemeanors
subject to Chapter 1-3-1 RMC.
13
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XXXVII. An emergency is hereby declared and this ordinance shall
take effect immediately.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
Bonnie L Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1210:10/12/05:ma
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
14
/sf M, coos
Ado��e,d Id- i7-05'
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. S/ D
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
GRANTING UNTO SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., A
DELAWARE LIMITED PARNERSHIP, ITS SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS, THE RIGHT, PRIVILEGE, AUTHORITY AND MASTER USE
AGREEMENT TO INSTALL TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES
TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES THERETO, UPON, OVER,
UNDER, ALONG, ACROSS THE STREETS, AVENUES AND ALLEYS OF
THE CITY OF RENTON WITHIN CITY RIGHT OF WAY AND PUBLIC
PROPERTIES OF THE CITY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Master Use Agreement
There is hereby given and granted unto Sprint Communications Company L.P., a Delaware
Limited Partnership, its successors, and assignees for a period of 10-years from the effective
date of this master use agreement, the rights, privileges, and authority to construct, operate,
maintain, replace, alter, remove and repair one or more wireless communications facilities
("Facilities"), together with all equipment, support structures, conduit, cables and appurtenances
of Grantees' systems, under, along, over, below and through certain public right-of-way and
other public lands within the City of Renton.
The following City codes shall apply to this agreement in their entirety:
City Code 4-2-080A 5-19-05
4-4-140
5-19-07
4-2-070
5-19-08
4-5-050B
5-19-09
4-11-230
5-19-10
SECTION II. Non -Exclusive Master Use Agreement (Code 5-19-5)
This Master Use Agreement is granted upon the express condition that it shall not be deemed or
held to be an exclusive agreement in, along, over, through, under, below, or across any of said
public rights -of -ways, public thoroughfares, sidewalks, and utility easements within the City of
Renton. Such agreement shall in no way prevent or prohibit the City of Renton or its tenants
from using any of said roads, streets or other public or tenant properties or affect its jurisdiction
over them or any part of them. The City of Renton retains full power to make all necessary
changes, relocation's, repairs, maintenance, establishment, improvement, dedication of same as
they may deem fit including the dedication, establishment, maintenance and improvement of all
ORDINANCE NO.
new rights -of -ways and thoroughfares and other public properties of every type and description.
Sprint Communications Company L.P., as Grantee herein, agrees and covenants at its sole cost
and expense to protect, support, temporarily disconnect, relocate, or remove from any street any
of its installations when so required by the City of
Renton, upon not less then ninety (90) days prior written notice. ("Relocation Notice"). The
Relocation Notice shall specify the applicable City Project, the "Cause" of the relocation and any
alternate right of way available for relocation - Cause for the City of Renton to issue such
Relocation Notice shall be the City's reasonable determination that Grantee's Facilities will
conflict with a City Project. "City Project" is the project necessitating the relocation, which City
project must primarily benefit the public (and not directly, or indirectly, primarily benefit a
private entity or entities or other commercial enterprise). Examples of City Projects include but
are not limed to public safety, street vacations, dedications of new rights -of -ways and the
establishment and improvement thereof, freeway construction, change of establishment of street
grade or the construction of any public improvement or structure by Government agency acting
in a Government capacity for the benefit of the public generally ("City Project"). The parties
acknowledge and agree that when a relocation is requested in connection with a project primarily
benefiting or facilitating a planned development of a private entity, business owner or
commercial concern, the party or parties benefiting from the utility relocation should bear the
cost of utility relocation. The Grantee shall in all such cases have the privilege to temporarily by-
pass, in the authorized portion of the same street, upon approval by the City of Renton, any
section of the System required to be temporarily disconnected or removed If Grantee is unable to
by-pass the affected Facilities during the City's Project, the City and Grantee shall reasonably
cooperate to allow Grantee to operate a temporary facility on property owned, operated or
controlled by City in the immediate vicinity, if possible. In the event Grantee must permanently
relocate any Facilities due to such Project by the City, the City agrees to use best efforts to
relocate Grantee's Facilities to an adjacent right of way area.
Grantee may, after receipt of written Relocation Notice requesting a permanent relocation of its
Facilities, submit to the City written alternatives to such relocation. The City shall evaluate such
alternatives and advise Grantee in writing if one or more of the alternatives are suitable to
accommodate the work, which would otherwise necessitate relocation of the Facilities. If so
requested by the City, Grantee shall submit additional relevant information to assist the City in
making such evaluation. The City shall give each alternative proposed by the Grantee full and fair
consideration, within a reasonable time so as to allow for the relocation work to be performed in a
timely manner. In the event the City ultimately determines not less than fifteen (15) days from the
commencement of such work by the City that there is no other reasonable alternative, Grantee shall
relocate its Facilities as otherwise provided in this Section.
SECTION III. Location of Facilities:
The location of facilities shall be underground or in accordance with City code 5-19-5(I) 1
through 4 as conditions warrant.
2
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION IV. Master Use/Franchise Construction Permit (Code 5-19-9):
A Master Use/Franchise Construction permit application with three (3) sets of plans is required
for each proposed project. All construction, and installation of work wherever same crosses any
of the public properties shall be done under the supervision of the duly authorized representative
of the Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, and Grantee shall timely submit unto the
Public Works Administrator, prior to any such work, detailed plans and specifications of any
proposed work. The location of any Permit on public property in a street, Municipal Airport, or
other public area shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Administrator or his
authorized representative and such approval shall be provided in writing.
The Grantee shall further inform the City of any time or date that the Grantee is performing work
within the franchised area to allow the City to inspect such work. Work within City Streets
shall be accomplished through boring rather than open trenchinLl whenever reasonably
feasible. New facilities installed within City rights -of -way shall be located outside of the street
travel and parking lanes, whenever feasible and will not delay or increase the costs of the
proposed facilities. The Master Use/Franchise Construction permit fee is stated in Section 18 of
this agreement document.
SECTION V. System Components:
All components of the System and other components of any communication line, to be placed
within any street right-of-way, Municipal Airport, or other public property shall be designated,
manufactured, and installed in accordance and in full compliance with industry standards and
applicable ordinances.
Placement of conduit in street crossings shall be PVC schedule 80 or steel conduit. Schedule 40
PVC is acceptable in areas outside the roadway.
SECTION VI. Permanent Records (Code 5-19-9)(N):
The Grantee shall at all times keep full and complete plans, profiles and records showing the
location, installed depth and size of all its installations and systems wherefore laid in the City
and hereafter installed. Such plans and records shall be kept current by the Grantee. As -built
plans and records shall be available to the City at all times upon request. A telephone contact
number for requested plans shall be supplied to the City and kept current.
SECTION VIL Planning for Construction:
During any period of construction, all surface structures, if any, shall be erected and used in such
places and positions within said public right-of-way, and other public properties so as to interfere
as little as possible with the free passage of traffic and the free use of adjoining property and
tenants and Grantee shall at all times post and maintain proper barricades during such period of
construction as required by the laws and statutes of the State of Washington. The Grantee shall
avoid the use of arterials as designated by the City of Renton Arterial Street Map, defined by the
Transportation Department and recently constructed or paved overlaid streets as much as
possible. Specific route alignments are subject to approval by the City via the construction
ORDINANCE NO.
permitting process. All components of the System constructed and installed by the Grantee
underground, within the City of Renton, shall be located in approved locations, buried and
installed to a depth of not less than three feet and as otherwise provided for in the aforesaid
Code, the laws of the State of Washington, and the ordinances of the City of Renton, now or
hereafter in force, regulating such installations. Grantee shall establish and maintain at all times
adequate facilities on the portion of each of the systems installed under the authority of this
agreement, and elsewhere on the system, to promptly localize operating troubles and to minimize
the effects thereof, whether on City streets or on their use by the public.
All truck, vehicles, and equipment working in City right-of-way shall be marked with
company logo, including company name and phone numbers.
Approved traffic control plans shall be utilized for each installation when working in the public
right-of-way (code 5-19-11)(F).
The Grantee shall be responsible for all work by their contractor, meeting the
requirements of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for all work
within the public right-of-ways.
The Grantee shall be responsible for notifying the Valley Communication Center for any
street closures, a minimum of 24 hours prior to said closure.
The Grantee shall subscribe to and maintain membership in the regional "One -Call" utility
location service and shall promptly locate all of its lines upon request.
SECTION V111. Restoration And Repair of Facilities (Code 5-19-10)(H):
Grantee, its successors and assignees, hereby agrees and covenants to promptly repair any
damage to City or tenant property of every type and nature and all other City or tenant
improvements caused by failure of Grantee's work during the life of this Agreement. Should it
be necessary to make any excavation within any public right-of-way, in the laying, constructing,
maintenance, removing, replacing, altering or repairing of all or any portion of the system,
Grantee shall without delay and at Grantee's sole cost and expense, restore the surface of said
right-of-way or other public or tenant property to at least the same condition immediately prior to
any such installation and construction. In case of damage by the Grantee to said streets, avenues,
roads, alleys, lanes, public places and ways, to the pavement, turnouts, gutters, ditches, walks,
poles, pipes, plantings, rail, bridges, trestles, wharves or landings, and/or other appurtenances
and improvements, the Grantee shall immediately repair all damage at its sole cost and expense.
Grantee shall comply with all ordinances and regulations of the City of Renton, Washington,
regarding such excavation and whenever deemed necessary by the Public Works Administrator
shall be required to post a performance bond in favor of the City warranting, among other things,
that such restoration work will be done promptly to a condition equal or better than the original
condition and in a proper, workman like manner.
Where concrete encased recorded monuments have been disturbed or displaced, Grantee shall
restore the monument to federal state and local standards and specifications.
All restoration of public streets, sidewalks, and other amenities shall conform to current City of
Renton Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction and the City of
lv
ORDINANCE NO.
Renton's Trench Restoration Standards. As a condition of receiving the right to work within the
public right-of-way, Sprint Communications Company L.P. shall assume full responsibility for
using materials and installation methods that are in full compliance with City Standards and shall
verify this by submittal of documentation of materials and testing reports when requested by the
City. All costs for performing on -site testing, such as Compaction tests, shall be borne by Sprint
Communications Company L.P.
SECTION IX. Hold Harmless Agreement:
The Grantee, its successors and assignees, agrees and covenants to indemnify and hold harmless
the City of Renton from and against any and all liability, loss cost, damage, whether to persons
or property, or expense of any type or nature to the extent it arises (collectively, "Claims") from
any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Grantee, its successors and assigns arising
from or connected to the Grantee's work under this Agreement, except to the extent any such
Claim is due to the negligence or intentional acts of the City, its employees, agents or
independent contractors. In addition, in case any suit or action is instituted against the City by
reasons of any such damage or injury, City shall (i) cause written notice thereof to be given unto
Grantee and (ii) give all reasonably requested assistance in defense or settlement of such claim at
Grantee's expense, and (iii) grant Grantee the right to control the defense or settlement of such
claims.
SECTION X. Liability Insurance (Code 5-19-10 (O, P, Q & R):
Sprint Communications Company L.P. shall maintain in full force and effect throughout the term
of this agreement, Comprehensive General Liability insurance coverage, inclusive of umbrella
coverage, insuring both the Grantee and the City and its elected and appointed officers, officials,
agents and employees as additionally insured as follows:
1. Comprehensive general liability insurance, inclusive of umbrella coverage, with limits
not less than:
a. Five million dollars ($5,000,000) for bodily injury or death to each person;
b. Five million dollars ($5,000,000) for property damage resulting from any one
accident;
2. Automobile liability insurance for owned, non -owned, and hired vehicles, inclusive of
umbrella coverage, with a limit of three million dollars ($3,000,000);
3. Worker's compensation with statutory limits and employer liability insurance, inclusive
of umbrella coverage, with limits of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000); and
4. Comprehensive form premises - Operations, explosions and collapse hazard,
underground hazard and products completed hazard, inclusive of umbrella coverage, with
limits of not less than three million dollars ($3,000,000).
The Grantee shall submit to the City Clerk evidence that it has in full force and effect and shall
keep in full force and effect during the life of the Agreement, comprehensive general liability
insurance naming Grantee and the City of Renton as additional insured with coverage as stated
above.
ORDINANCE NO.
It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy may not be canceled until 30 days after receipt
of a written notice addressed as required by such intent to cancel.
After receipt by the City of said notice, and in no event later than ten days prior to said
cancellation, the Grantee shall obtain and furnish to the City replacement insurance policies
meeting the requirements of this section.
SECTION XI. Revocation or Termination of Grant (Code 5-19-10)(U &V):
For the purpose of compelling compliance by the Grantee with all the terms and conditions of
this Agreement and the maintenance of said System and facilities in good condition, City retains
the right to end and terminate and fully forfeit the Agreement herein granted, within (30) thirty
days after written notice unto the Grantee, whenever the Grantee fails to comply with any of the
material terms and conditions hereof, provided that Grantee has a reasonable length of time in
which to cure such noncompliance. Upon forfeiture the City shall have the right to require the
Grantee to remove any and all of its systems within the City of Renton, all at the Grantee's cost
and expense, and to promptly and timely restore all roads and other public properties to the
condition immediately prior to any such forfeiture and termination.
However, the Grantee may apply to the City for an extension of time to comply due to
unavoidable delays and events beyond its control. The extension of time will not be
unreasonably withheld as determined by the City.
SECTION XII. Reservation of Rights (Code 5-19-12)(D):
The Grantee acknowledges that its rights hereunder are subject to the legitimate rights of the
police power of the City at all times and the City shall enforce general ordinances necessary to
protect the safety and welfare of the public. The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable
general laws enacted by the City as long as such regulations do not increase the burden or impair
the rights of the agreement hereunder.
The laying, construction, installation, maintenance and operation of the Facilities, System and
facilities in connection therewith shall not preclude the City of Renton, its authorized agents,
contractors and representatives from blasting, grading, excavating or doing other necessary or
public works over, unto, abutting, or contiguous to Grantee's System provided, however, that
Grantee shall be given (10) ten working days written notice of any such blasting, grading, or
excavating so that the Grantee may take proper steps to protect its communication line and
facilities.
The parties agree that this Agreement is intended to satisfy the requirements of all applicable
laws, administrative guidelines, rules, orders and ordinances (the "Law"). Accordingly, any
provision of this Agreement or any local ordinance, which may conflict with or violate the Law,
shall be invalid and unenforceable, whether occurring before or after the execution of this
Agreement, it being the intention of the parties (i) to preserve their respective rights and
remedies under the Law, and (ii) that the execution of this Agreement does not constitute a
waiver of any rights or obligations by either party under the Law. The provisions of this
Agreement shall be applied to all telecommunication providers in a competitively neutral and
nondiscriminatory manner.
31
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION XIII. Damage, Injury, or Loss (Code 5-19-10)(K):
Except for damage, injury, or loss caused by the City of Renton, the Grantee shall have no
recourse whatsoever against the City of Renton for any loss cost, expense, or damage arising out
of any provision or requirement of this Agreement or the enforcement thereof. This Agreement
does not relieve the Grantee of any requirement of any City Ordinance, rule or regulation, or
specification of the City, including but not limited to any requirement relating to street work,
street excavation permits and fees therefore, or the use, removal or relocation of property and
streets. No privilege nor exemption is granted or conferred unto the Grantee by this Agreement
except those specifically prescribed herein, and any such privilege claimed under this Agreement
by the Grantee in any street shall be subordinate to any prior lawful occupancy of the street or
any subsequent improvement or installation therein.
SECTION XIV.
Discontinued Agreement (Code 5-19-10(1) 1-5):
In the event the use of any permitted property is permanently discontinued by Grantee, or no
Permit has been obtained therefore upon expiration of this Agreement, or within thirty days after
any termination of this Agreement, then the Grantee shall promptly remove from the streets and
other properties all its facilities, other than any the City may permit to be temporarily or
permanently abandoned. However, upon written consent by the City, Grantee may leave any
facilities temporarily or permanently abandoned within the streets or other properties.
SECTION XV. Ownership Transfer (Code 5-19-10(T) 1-6):
This Agreement may not be assigned to a successor or assignees without the prior written
consent of the City Council of the City of Renton, provided that Grantee may assign this
Agreement to a parent or affiliate upon prior written notice to the City. The City will not delay or
withhold written consent without just cause. For the purposes of this section, a merger or
corporate reorganization of any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with
Grantee shall not be deemed a transfer of assignment.
SECTION XVI. Security Device (Code 5-19-10(Q):
The Grantee shall, within (10) ten days after the award of this Agreement, file with the City of
Renton Public Works Department at all times thereafter maintain in full force and effect an
acceptable
security device or escrow account in duplicate effective for the entire term of this Agreement,
and conditional that in the event Grantee shall fail to comply with any one or more of the
provisions of this Agreement then there shall be recovered jointly and severally from the
principal and surety of such security device or escrow account any damage suffered by the City
as a result thereof, including
the full amount of any compensation, indemnification or cost of removal or abandonment of
properties herein above described, up to the full amount of the said bond, said condition to be a
continuing obligations within the City of Renton or may have arisen from the acceptance of such
7
ORDINANCE NO.
Agreement by the Grantee or from its exercise of any such privilege herein granted. The
security device or escrow account initially filed in accordance with the requirement of this
Section shall be in the amount of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000). In the event of
substantial change in volume of street space occupied by permitted properties, the City may
permit or may require a corresponding change in the amount of such security device or escrow
account. The bond form set forth as attachment " C " is deemed an approved security device.
SECTION XVII. System Expansion:
Upon application to the City of Renton's, Department of Building/Planning/Public Works by the
Grantee, the Department of Public Works may authorize the Grantee to install, construct and/or
retain in City streets additional System expansions, as contemplated in Section I hereof, in
manner satisfactory to the Department of Public Works. Such additional installations shall be
subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Master Use Agreement and to any such
additional conditions as may be prescribed by the Department of Public Works as to any such
additions.
The City of Renton conducts both an annual pavement overlay program and a 6-year
transportation improvement program for the repair and improvement of city streets. The City
publishes updates to these programs annually. It is the City's intent that newly paved streets not
be excavated or damaged within five years of pavement installation. It is therefore the Grantee's
responsibility to obtain the City's annual publications regarding the pavement overlay program
and the 6-year transportation improvement program, and to schedule any system expansions or
programmed maintenance operations in such a way as to avoid disturbing pavement within five
years of installation. The City of Renton reserves the right to withhold issuance of permits for
planned expansion or maintenance activities that will damage pavement within five years of its
installation.
SECTION XVIII. Telecommunication/Permit Fees:
The Grantee, Sprint Communications Company L.P., its successors and assignees) agrees to pay
annually to the City of Renton from and after the date of acceptance of this Agreement and
during the period it shall remain in effect a yearly recurring fee of $3,000.00 for the use of the
public rights -of -way within the City of Renton.
Payment to the City will be made to the Finance and Information Service Administrator on or
before August 1 st of each year during the period that this Agreement shall remain in effect.
Master Use/Franchise Construction Permit Fee is $50.00. Inspection rate is billed at $40.00 an
hour.
Sprint Communications Company L.P. does hereby agree to pay a one time Administrative fee
for Agreement preparation and processing of $5,000 dollars.
SECTION XIX. Applicants Contacts:
Any notices or information required to be given to parties under this Master Use Agreement may
be sent to the following addresses unless otherwise directed.
ORDINANCE NO.
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Attn: Transaction and Project Services
Mailstop: KSOPHT0101-Z2040
6391 Sprint Parkway
Overland Park, Kansas 66251-2040
Forward copies of notices of default to:
Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Attn: Real Estate Attorney
Mailstop: KSOPHT0101-Z2020
6391 Sprint Parkway
Overland Park, Kansas 66251-2020
SECTION XIX. Effective Date:
Renton City Hall
Attn: Jan Illian
Development Services
1055 — S. Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
6th Floor
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and five days
after it legal publication as provided by law, and provided it has been duly accepted by Grantee
as herein above provided.
SECTION XX. Environmental Indemnification:
Grantee shall not introduce or use any Hazardous Substance on the Property in violation of any
applicable law. Grantee shall be responsible for, and shall promptly conduct any investigation
and remediation as required by any applicable environmental laws, all spills or other releases of
any Hazardous Substance caused by Grantee, that have occurred or which may occur on the
Property. Each party agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other from and against
any and all administrative and judicial actions and rulings, claims, causes of action, demands and
liability (collectively, "Claims") including, but not limited to, damages, costs, expenses,
assessments, penalties, fines, losses, judgments and reasonable attorney fees that the indemnitee
may suffer or incur due to the existence or discovery of any Hazardous Substances on the
Property or the migration of any Hazardous Substance to other properties or the release of any
Hazardous Substance into the environment (collectively, "Actions"), that relate to or arise from
the indemnitor's activities on the Property. The indemnifications in this section specifically
include, without limitation, costs incurred in connection with any investigation of site conditions
or any cleanup, remedial, removal or restoration work required by any governmental authority.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of )2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
9
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.1208:10/6/05:ma
ACCEPTED BY GRANTEE, SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P. this
day of
Signature
Print Name
Signature
Print Name
TITLE
TITLE
20
2005.
10
BY t
TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE CITY COUNCIL ;
COMMITTEE REPORT
Date aDCQS
October Jam, 2005
Master Use Agreement for Sprint Communications.
(Referred September 19, 2005)
..., �.....�portation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff
recommendation to approve the Sprint Communications Master Use Agreement, which
would generate revenue of $3,000 annually over the proposed 10-year term. Sprint
Communications, a telecommunications provider and carrier, requested the Master Use
Agreement, and plans to build a lateral fiber route from their backbone system in Tukwila
to their switch site located at 1415 Maple Avenue SW in Renton. The build is for
Sprint's own corporate use. Conduit and fiber will be installed underground using
conventional trenching, horizontal boring, and directional drilling methods. City Code
encourages telecommunications services such as this to promote competition and provide
advanced services on the widest possible basis to businesses, institutions, and residences
of the City for the future.
The Committee further recommends that the Master Use Agreement Ordinance be
presented for first reading.
Marcie Pawner, Chair
Don Persson, Vice Chair
Randy Corman, Member
cc: Jan Illian, Engineering Specialist