No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 06/20/2005AGENDA RENTON CITY COUNCIL *REVISED* REGULAR MEETING June 20, 2005 Monday, 7:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL 3. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Survey Results on the Effectiveness of the Ahead of the Curve Campaign 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Sewer moratorium for sewer service to new subdivisions outside City limits on the East Renton Plateau b. Proposed Wedgewood Lane Annexation and zoning requirement for 35.68 acres located east of 144th Ave. SE (Jericho Ave. NE), if extended, and west of 148th Ave. SE (Nile Ave. NE) 5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT 6. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.) When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME. 7. CONSENT AGENDA *(item removed)* The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further discussion if requested by a Councilmember. a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of June 13, 2005. Council concur. b. City Clerk reports bid opening on 6/14/2005 for CAG-05-078, S. 4th St. and Burnett Ave. S. Traffic Improvements; three bids; engineer's estimate $172,165.95; and submits staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Valley Electric Co., in the amount of $178,085.30. Council concur. c. Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommends the following: reorganization, title changes, and salary adjustments for two positions in the Housing Repair Division; salary adjustment for the Police Manager position; and title change and salary adjustment for the Civil Engineer III position in the Utilities Division. Refer to Finance Committee. d. Transportation Systems Division submits the annual update of the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Arterial Street Plan. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee; set a public hearing on 7/11/2005 to consider the TIP. e. Transportation Systems Division requests approval of an Airport sublease from AirO, Inc. to Worldwind Helicopters, Inc., and approval of an operating permit and agreement with WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. f. Transportation Systems Division requests approval of an Airport sublease from AirO, Inc. to Aero-Copters, Inc., and approval of an operating permit and agreement with Aero-Copters, Inc. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. (CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE) g. Utility Systems Division recommends approval of a concurrence letter with Washington State Department of Transportation for the proposed Johns Creek Outfall storm water system. Refer to Utilities Committee. 8. CORRESPONDENCE E-mail from Diane McClaine, 23402 SE 217th Pl., Maple Valley, 98038, expressing concern regarding the lack of parking at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park for those who have signed up to take a class at the park. She suggested reserving parking spaces for class attendees or allowing class attendees to park in the boat launch parking area. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 10. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Ordinances for first reading: a. Approving the Wedgewood Lane Annexation (see 4.b.) b. Approving R-4 zoning for the Wedgewood Lane Annexation (see 4.b.) Ordinance for second and final reading: 2005 Budget amendment (lst reading 6/13/2005) 11. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded information.) 12. AUDIENCE COMMENT 13. ADJOURNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE AGENDA (Preceding Council Meeting) CANCELLED • Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk • CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting June 20, 2005 Council Chambers Monday, 7:30 p.m. MINUTES Renton City Hall CALL TO ORDER Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. ROLL CALL OF TERRI BRIERE, Council President; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER. CITY STAFF IN KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief ATTENDANCE Administrative Officer; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; DAVE CHRISTENSEN, Utility Engineering Supervisor; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development Administrator; DON ERICKSON, Senior Planner; COMMANDER KENT CURRY, Police Department. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Administrator, explained that in 1998 the EDNSP: Business Leaders City partnered with the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce, Valley Medical Views of Renton Survey Center, Renton Technical College, and the Renton School District to combine resources and collectively market the Renton community. The partnership resulted in the development of the "Ahead of the Curve" brand, and Renton was one of the first cities in the nation to brand its community in this manner. Mr. Pietsch reported that the Renton Community Marketing Campaign Committee hired Elway Research, Inc. to conduct a survey to assess whether the "Ahead of the Curve" branding played a role in the economic expansion of the City. Mr. Pietsch introduced Stuart Elway who reported on the findings of the Business Leaders' Views of Renton survey. He stated that a telephone survey was conducted of business operators of 157 businesses located between Mukilteo and Federal Way. Mr. Elway reviewed the survey questions and results, which related to business location, business relocation, community requirements and amenities, familiarity with Renton, Renton's strong points and drawbacks, and the "Ahead of the Curve" slogan. Mr. Elway summarized that the survey showed recognition of Renton as a changing and growing city, and that the marketing campaign is having the intended effect. Mr. Pietsch stated that the marketing committee will review the survey results, and the data will be used to formulate future marketing campaign strategies. He noted that some of the businesses expressed interest in being contacted in the future to discuss the potential of locating to Renton. Councilman Corman said he was impressed with the number of people who have heard of Renton's slogan. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler expressed her pleasure with the number of people who have visited Renton within the last year. PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Utility: Sewer Moratorium in accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the East Renton Plateau PAA public hearing to consider the six-month moratorium on sewer availabilities for new subdivisions within the East Renton Plateau potential annexation area. June 20, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 222 Dave Christensen, Utility Engineering Supervisor, reviewed ordinances relating to the provision of sewer service outside the City limits. He pointed out that Ordinance 5123, adopted in January 2005, allows sewer availabilities for new subdivisions conditioned upon development meeting Renton's basic zoning and land use criteria. Mr. Christensen noted the receipt of a letter in May from the Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (CARE), in which concern was expressed regarding Renton's issuance of sewer availabilities that cover only the core development standards. He noted CARE's belief that the City's development requirements would have a negative effect on the group's effort to gather support for an annexation. Continuing, Mr. Christensen stated that the resolution establishing the moratorium was adopted on June 6th. He reported that the City has received three complete applications for sewer availability outside the City limits since the adoption of Ordinance 5123 in January. Two of the subdivision projects have received sewer availability certificates, and the third project, which was submitted on June 2nd, is currently under review. Public comment was invited. Correspondence was read from Theresa M. Brehmer, Land Acquisition Manager for Bennett Development, Inc., 12011 NE 1st St., Suite 201, Bellevue, 98005, stating that while she supports CARE's annexation effort, she is concerned about how the moratorium will affect Bennett Development's subdivision development located within the East Renton Plateau area. Noting that a majority of the annexation process is achievable within the six-month moratorium period, Ms. Brehmer asked that the City not extend the moratorium unless a formal submittal has been given to the Boundary Review Board by the beginning of October 2005. Correspondence was read from Tom Carpenter, 15006 SE 139th Pl., Renton, 98059, expressing support for the moratorium. Noting that the moratorium is linked to an annexation effort, he stressed that the annexation decision, regardless of the outcome, will have a profound impact on the qualify of life in the East Renton Plateau area. Mr. Carpenter urged the City to add its voice with King County and the State to address the issue of quality of life in urban growth areas such as this. Theresa M. Brehmer, Land Acquisition Manager for Bennett Development, Inc., 12011 NE 1st St., Suite 201, Bellevue, 98005, stated that Bennett Development is in the process of developing property within the subject area, and she expressed her hope that CARE will expedite its annexation effort and that the moratorium will not be unduly extended. Garrett Huffman, 335 116th Ave. SE, Bellevue, 98004, speaking on behalf of the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties, questioned how the City can implement a sewer moratorium if the City is not experiencing a sewer capacity issue. Noting that the Master Builders Association has appealed other jurisdiction's decisions relating to actions in their annexation areas to Superior Courts, Mr. Huffman stated that the association wants to further discuss the moratorium with the City Attorney. June 20, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 223 Discussion ensued regarding a future discussion of the matter by the City's and the association's legal counsel, and the timing of the annexation effort, the moratorium, and a potential court challenge. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Annexation: Wedgewood This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in Lane, 144th Ave SE & 148th accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the Ave SE public hearing to consider the proposed annexation and R-4 zoning of property that abuts Renton on its west; and is bounded on the north by SE 114th St., if extended; on the south by approximately SE 121st St., if extended; and on the east, south of SE 117th St. by Honey Creek, and north of SE 117th St. by 148th Ave. SE (Wedgewood Lane). Don Erickson, Senior Planner, reported that this is the second of two public hearings on the matter, and the Boundary Review Board approved the proposed annexation on 5/17/2005. He noted that the site consists of approximately 35.68 acres, and contains 25 single-family dwellings. He described the topography of the site, which slopes downward from the northwest and northeast corners towards Honey Creek at a ten to fifteen percent slope. Reviewing the public services, Mr. Erickson indicated that Fire District #10, Water District #90, Renton sewer, and the Issaquah School District serve the site. Mr. Erickson reported that current King County zoning for the site is R-4 (four dwelling units per gross acre), which is comparable to Renton's R-8 zoning. The Renton Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Residential Low Density, for which R-4 (four dwelling units per net acre) zoning is recommended. He noted that R-4 zoning is consistent with the environmental sensitivity of the area. Continuing, Mr. Erickson reviewed the fiscal impact analysis, assuming a new home value of $450,000 and a potential of 114 single-family homes at full development. The City will realize a deficit of $434 at current development, and a surplus of $30,902 at full development. The estimated one-time parks acquisition and development cost is $74,030. Mr. Erickson concluded that the proposed annexation serves the best interests and general welfare of the City, and pointed out that new development will result in streets and stormwater detention facilities built to City standards. Public comment was invited. Correspondence was read from Mark Engbaum and Renee Korsmo, 14522 SE 116th St., Renton, 98059, expressing support for the annexation and R-4 zoning. They noted that R4 zoning will help preserve the rural feel of the area. There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. June 20, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 224 MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL: SUPPORT R-4 ZONING CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION, ACCEPT THE WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION, AND CONCURRENTLY IMPOSE R4 ZONING ON THE NON -STREET PORTIONS OF THE ANNEXATION SITE. CARRIED. (See page 226 for ordinances.) ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included: • A community meeting to discuss the future Heather Downs Park will be held on June 28th, 7:00 p.m., at the Highlands Community Center. On June 30th, an open house will be held at the future park site located on Union Ave. NE between NE 3rd Ct. and NE 2nd Pl. from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. • The City's swimming beaches will be open for the season from June 25th through September 5th, from 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m. • Conveniently rid your house, garage, and yard of unwanted junk during the one -day -only Neighbor -to -Neighbor Curbside Cleanup on June 25th. Solid Waste: Clean Sweep Mayor Keolker-Wheeler pointed out that the one-time Neighbor to Neighbor Renton Events Curbside Cleanup is the last opportunity to participate in the Clean Sweep Renton program events. Councilwoman Palmer noted the participation of the Kennydale Neighborhood Association in the Neighborhood Association Cleanup event over the weekend. AUDIENCE COMMENT David Main, 40305 302nd Ave. SE, Enumclaw, 98022, requested a hardship Citizen Comment: Main - exemption from the moratorium on new development in the Highlands Sub - Highlands Sub -Area Plan Area Plan study area. He explained that he submitted an application to replace Study Area Moratorium, a destroyed home located on Monroe Ave. NE with one single-family dwelling Exemption Request and was informed that he is unable to proceed with the project until the moratorium ends. Mr. Main pointed out that the plat has covenants attached that precludes any lot in the subdivision from being smaller than 6,000 square feet and narrower than 60 feet. Mr. Mann stated that the purpose of the moratorium is to review the area for possible density increases. He indicated that if it were not for the covenants recorded on the plat, two or three properties would be allowed on the site per current Renton zoning. Noting the economic hardship of not being able to develop his property, Mr. Mann suggested amending the moratorium to allow for hardship exemptions. Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator, stated that this situation seems to be an unintended consequence of the City's moratorium action. The moratorium was implemented to prevent subdivisions and activities in the R-10 zoned areas while the City reviews policies and new development standards. He explained that the moratorium provision that does not allow the issuance of building permits was mainly for those particular types of vested subdivisions. Mr. Zimmerman suggested that the matter be reviewed Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Administrator, stated that when the moratorium was invoked, he was unaware of the covenants underlying the June 20, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 225 subject subdivision. Noting the possibility of downzoning the subdivision to R- 8 to better match the underlying covenants, Mr. Pietsch agreed that the matter should be reviewed. The Mayor noted that the covenants may be in conflict with the Growth Management Act. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED. On another subject, Mr. Main complemented the City on its vision, pointing out that he intends to move back to Renton within the next five years. Citizen Comment: Huffman - Garrett Huffman, Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Highlands Sub -Area Plan Counties, 335 116th Ave. SE, Bellevue, 98004, expressed support for the City's Study Area Moratorium, review of Mr. Main's exemption request from the Highlands area moratorium. Exemption Request CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing. Council Meeting Minutes of Approval of Council meeting minutes of June 13, 2005. Council concur. June 13, 2005 CAG: 05-078, S 4th St & City Clerk reported bid opening on 6/14/2005 for CAG-05-078, S. 4th St. and Burnett Ave S Traffic Burnett Ave. S. Traffic Improvements; three bids, engineer's estimate Improvements, Valley Electric $172,165.95; and submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder, Valley Electric Co., in the amount of $178,085.30. Council concur. Human Resources: Salary Human Resources and Risk Management Department recommended the Adjustments of Four Positions following: reorganization, title changes, and salary adjustments of two positions in the Housing Repair Division; salary adjustment for the Police Manager position; and title change and salary adjustment for the Civil Engineer III position in the Utilities Division. Refer to Finance Committee. Transportation: 2006-2011 TIP Transportation Systems Division submitted the annual update of the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Arterial Street Plan. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee; set a public hearing on 7/11/2005 to consider the TIP. Airport: WorldWind Transportation Systems Division requested approval of an airport sublease from Helicopters Operating Permit AirO, Inc. to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc., and approval of an operating permit & Sublease and agreement with WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Airport: Aero-Copters Transportation Systems Division requested approval of an airport sublease from Operating Permit and Sublease AirO, Inc. to Aero-Copters, Inc., and approval of an operating permit and agreement with Aero-Copters, Inc. Refer to Transportation (Aviation) Committee. Utility: Johns Creek Outfall Utility Systems Division recommended approval of a concurrence letter with Stormwater System Washington State Department of Transportation for the proposed Johns Creek Concurrence, WSDOT Outfall stormwater system. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. June 20, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 226 CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Diane McClaine, 23402 SE 217th Pl., Maple Citizen Comment: McClaine - Valley, 98038, expressing concern regarding the lack of parking at Gene Gene Coulon Park, Lack of Coulon Memorial Beach Park for those who have signed up to take a class at Parking for Class Attendance the park. She suggested reserving parking spaces for class attendees or allowing class attendees to park in the boat launch parking area. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Public Safety Committee Chair Law presented a report regarding the race Public Safety Committee attendance ordinance. The Committee recommended concurrence in the staff Police: Street Racing Event recommendation to approve an amendment to City Code prohibiting attendance Attendance Prohibition at nighttime street racing events and criminalizing violations. The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for adoption. MOVED BY LAW, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.* Expressing concern that the language in the ordinance is overbroad, Councilman Clawson noted that a person who happens to be in the area of a street race may unintentionally observe the event. He recommended language such as "an intent to be in the area for the purpose of observing the race." Councilman Corman stated his appreciation for Councilman Clawson's concern, and encouraged him to review the ordinance. Zanetta Fontes, Assistance City Attorney, pointed out that the ordinance states: "It is unlawful for any person to enter or remain in a designated 'No Racing Zone'... if... 2) (S)he intends to observe, support, or encourage the unlawful race event." Ms. Fontes stated that the language was included in an effort to avoid the situation that Mr. Clawson referred to, the accidental observation of a race event. Discussion ensued regarding the ordinance language. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler pointed out that the matter before Council is the Committee report, and the ordinance has not yet been scheduled for first reading. She suggested that Mr. Clawson pursue his concerns about the ordinance language with the City Attorney. *MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTIONS AND The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the ORDINANCES Council meeting of 6/27/2005 for second and final reading: Annexation: Wedgewood An ordinance was read annexing approximately 35.68 acres located east of Lane, 144th Ave SE & 148th 144th Ave. SE (Jericho Ave. NE), if extended, and west of 148th Ave. SE (Nile Ave SE Ave. NE), north of SE 117th St., and west of Honey Creek, south of SE 117th St., if extended (Wedgewood Lane Annexation). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/27/2005. CARRIED. Annexation: Wedgewood An ordinance was read establishing the zoning classification of property Lane, R-4 Zoning annexed within the City of Renton located east of 144th Ave. SE (Jericho Ave. NE), if extended, and west of 148th Ave. SE (Nile Ave. NE), north of SE 117th St., and west of Honey Creek, south of SE 117th St., if extended, from R-4 (Urban Residential - four dwelling units per acre; King County zoning) to R-4 (Residential - four dwelling units per acre) zoning; Wedgewood Lane Annexation. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/27/2005. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: June 20, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 227 Ordinance #5146 An ordinance was read amending Ordinance 5110 relating to the City of Renton Budget: 2005 Amendment 2005 Budget, increasing the 2005 Budget to $177,386,415. MOVED BY (Carry Forward & Additional LAW, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS Appropriations) READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER Budget: 2005 First Quarter THE 2005 FIRST QUARTER BUDGET STATUS REPORT TO THE Status Report FINANCE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. EXECUTIVE SESSION MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL RECESS AND ADJOURNMENT INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTES TO DISCUSS LITIGATION WITH NO OFFICIAL ACTION TO BE TAKEN AND THAT THE COUNCIL MEETING BE ADJOURNED WHEN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IS ADJOURNED. CARRIED. Time: 8:57 p.m. Executive session was conducted. There was no action taken. The executive session and the Council meeting adjourned at 9:21 p.m. Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk Recorder: Michele Neumann June 20, 2005 RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR Office of the City Clerk COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 20, 2005 COMMITTEEXHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE (Briere) COMMUNITY SERVICES (Nelson) FINANCE (Persson) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (Clawson) PUBLIC SAFETY (Law) MON., 6/27 Prosperity Partnership Regional Economic 6:30 p.m. Strategy MON., 6/27 CANCELLED MON., 6/27 Vouchers; 5:00 p.m. 2005 Group Health Cooperative Medical Coverage Contracts; Position Reorganization and Reclassifications through June 2005; First Quarter Budget Status Report THURS., 6/23 2:00 p.m. TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION) THURS., 6/23 (Palmer) 2:30 p.m. UTILITIES (Corman) Multi -Family Housing Property Tax Exemption Amendments Airport Development Study; I-405 Funding (briefing only) NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers unless otherwise noted. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room unless otherwise noted. N 0 r 00 r Ln Lr) Lf) M W O O O rn U U o O c"j U O c 0 a c � m d N U d 0 O a 3 9 O w G O T V i11 Z O a n Q O N�N �f O o -� O p' O O O O d 0 M � 1 cD CD o ( tD O ffl CD A CD C C� O CCD N Q C O 7 z N ;Ai a � O J N Q L•iJ O o< O c CYI C EZ m� C) D 00 + Cn CD Q- CD D Z Z O CJ1 (D v o C) 00 Z C 3 cr MT h m a 0 N a O = O N + O V W r N U O J 4-1 m N V � � o i N ^� W 0 0 CD qrl Y_ A J Y Y J > Z Z 0 0 Q A m A A � cD o Z n O a D) C' a N A O c n N c m n d cc C C7 CD -i O -1 tAll O J c y O 7 70 O n C O 'a 0 0 O o N 0 cZD ' 2 O O CDsu Acu - - w' 0 .� .� CD N 7 7 ) rt o o C n V fit N � rn N to rt N a o a C O o d A N p rt JN. O N ^ o Q o J (n ZGo O < to 0 Co o 0, 0 c "e N Ao N Oo 0 m O Z Z < M 0 m r < x M r A D n 0 fD n C t 0 m OD � O p ° i pf n' N O z 3 O � N � - � N r 3 . � = z d� o � - o jR m V > M A N low.° O � N 4. O r � o 0 q u' K E d O �' O 2 LL U fn F- v > = CY Q >. o ' c � C3 z v aCL(D c ~ O Q o C1 o a c p L) y p c � a � 1-10 O at 04 N 0 N 0 � r o E To N O lC r � tD J J Vj C C d e- M 0 a 0 N n 0 0 1 vi c 3 c o '< z m G) ^ °o a � O a O a �° K r n 0 _ a O K -i 0 O 3 O z f0 o M F 0 0 W C O CL C D d _ 9 CD N CI a O A o O D J A 0 J c ` M N O r+ O r� Yl r+ Mg O 0. r+ E �m i N 3 O C cn^ l/ < M O � C 1 < O K � m 3 O y �; ^^ \ / O 7 7 K m 0 eYM. a W O Q Ul Q O Q O co e Q p� Q O 8 Renton - Ahead of the Curve 2005 12 Renton's Drawbacks Traffic I Commute 35% Already Well Located Not Mainstream t Out of Loop 15% Location No Need for Our Type of Biz Via% Too Far for Employees S% Negative Image 5%; Theft 3% Labor I Business Costs 3% Nothing T*fo. Don't Know 70�a 016 EllLRY RESERRCH.IMC. Renton -Ahead of the Curve 2005 13 Rating Renton Excellent - 6-9 Neutral 1-4 Poor Regional Medical Facility 6% 34% Competitive Taxes/Fees 6% 58°io Well -Run Government 5% 59% Affordable Housing 496 29% Quality of Life 3°10 !^`'e- as°io Good Public Schools 3% Nearby Training 296 `'' 41o% Quality Amenities 2% h;'rr�. 42% 017 ELWRY REEERRCN INC. D P c 0 CD 0 m o a N 0o o n�i C om, a c N O Z m < U. Ni CD fD O' (D N O' I CL D _W Q N ,. A O N CD ,. N O n' L " A L j L. CDN L F. 0A D 1 o `: u,' v o c c m 3 1 3 3 Gl O O. C O » O v 7 0 3 N N N N CO 00 O O 0 0 0 0-0- N 0 \ e o O N 0 A 0 0 i D 7 Z ID p O d a M c � o n Tj an d m w o c 00 d m o ^' iY m F+ N O '� N 7 C O Tom• ryrA 3 3 o c N a a n a N m 7 .Z) 3 c `D rCD < (O n N N U3 .Oi !D N fD o HN a O o� r f A 0 aJ iA N Ul A n m N J L m J 3 rt O A Renton - Ahead of the Curve 2005 Heard From 010 Renton - Ahead of the Curve 2005 Source of Info About Renton =37 Radio 41 % Newspaper 24% Word of Mouth 16% Mail 11% Magazine 5% Television 3% Fax I Email 3% Don't Recall 11 % Q10a 16 El ELINnVRESERRMINC. 17 a ELWRV RESERRCN.INC. 0 w Q 0 N O C -� I D 7 fD 3 ' - Q d a a 7 CD 3 d � in //���� n 0 (a U) < N aN 0 Ci o to< < :r C < m CD 0 0 n o C o G < V 3 0 N � o � N V o � ' ■ a N F1 � S 2 w 0 0 Z-< 0 CD to O 4W w= W ce /cn .i i 4W V _O O GC O N M CITY OF RENTON JUN 2 1 2005 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, RECEIVED On y ti U a; �LERK�s oFF,cENEIGHBORHOODS, PLANNING DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 14, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor -KW FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator (x6592)144 SUBJECT: MARKETING CAMPAIGN BUSINESS LEADER SURVEY As you know, the Renton Community Marketing Campaign began in 1998 as a partnership between the City of Renton, Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce, Renton Technical College, Renton School District, and Valley Medical Center. Since that time, these five agencies have pooled resources to market the community to the region. This campaign created the "Ahead of the Curve" brand and has been nationally recognized for its innovative approach. One of the challenges of the Campaign is that we have not been able to specifically measure our success. We know anecdotally that impressions of Renton have changed, but we have never been able to measure it. In 2005, the Marketing Campaign Committee used some of its resources to survey business leaders in the Puget Sound area. The attached document summarizes the findings of this survey. The results will be the basis of a special presentation at the Council meetings June 20th. Additionally, staff has offered to the other four stakeholders a similar presentation to their respective boards and leadership committees. Attachment cc: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer Department Administrators Julie Brewer, Communications Manager h:\ednsp\council\issue papers -agenda bills -me reports\2005\marketing survey memo.doc RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Business Leaders' VIEWS OF RENTON May 2005 Et ELWRV RESERRCH, INC. RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Business Leaders' VIEWS OF RENTON May 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction................................................................1 Methods.................................................................. 2 Respondent Profile ................................................ 3 Sources of Information..........................................3 2. Key Findings...............................................................4 3. Summary .................................................................... 7 Location Tendencies .............................................. 7 Important Community Attributes ........................... 8 Renton Awareness.................................................8 Impressions of Renton.........................................10 Possibility of Relocation.......................................12 4. Discussion................................................................14 Summary: Potential Messages ...........................15 5. Charts of Major Findings.........................................16 6. Appendix...................................................................36 Questionnaire with Topline Data Crosstabulation Tables May 2005 R ELMYRESERRCH, INC., I RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 1 INTRODUCTION This study was conducted by Elway Research for the Renton Community Marketing Campaign, which consists of the City of Renton, the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce, the Renton School District, Renton Technical College, the Renton Visitor's Connection, and Valley Medical Center. For the study, 157 business decision makers were interviewed by telephone. They were all located in the central Puget Sound region, between Mukilteo and Federal Way. As many of the largest businesses as possible (in terms of number of employees) were contacted, with the final sample consisting largely of companies of over 35 employees. The main purpose of the study was to evaluate Renton's brand recognition. Specifically, the survey sought to: 1) Measure the level of awareness of the Renton "Ahead of the Curve" campaign; 2) Assess Renton's perceived strengths and weaknesses; 3) Determine whether businesses would consider moving to Renton; 4) Identify effective means of communicating with business leaders. This narrative interpretation of findings is followed by charts of more detailed survey results. A complete set of crosstabulation tables is presented in the appendix, along with a copy of the questionnaire. May2005 M ELwRvjzESERRCH,iNC. RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN__ METHODS TECHNIQUE: Telephone survey of 157 businesses located between Mukilteo and Federal Way. The actual respondent within the company was identified as being responsible for decisions regarding location. Businesses of 50 or more employees were called first, followed by those with 35 to 49 employees. In order to obtain more responses, three companies of 25 to 35 employees were included. FIELD DATES: April 27th - May 6th, 2005 MARGIN OF ERROR: Since all businesses of the desired size were contacted, a "margin of sampling error" is not applicable. Not all firms are represented, though, as many businesses 'do not take part in surveys. There is no reason to believe, however, that those who declined to participate would be systematically different in their views toward Renton than those who were surveyed. DATA COLLECTION: Calls were made during weekdays. All interviews were conducted by trained, professional interviewers under supervision. Up to four attempts were made to contact a business leader at each number in the sample before a substitute number was called. Each questionnaire was checked and edited for completeness, and a percentage of each interviewer's calls was re- called for verification. INCENTIVE: Respondents were offered $20 for participating, to be donated to a charity of their choice. Their names and addresses were collected after completion of the survey and recorded separately. It must be kept in mind that survey research cannot predict the future. Although great care and rigorous methods were employed in the design, execution and analysis of this survey, these results can be interpreted only as representing the answers given by these respondents to these questions at the time they were interviewed. May 2005 CC ELWRV RESERRCN, Mr. RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN _ 3 RESPONDENT PROFILE The survey respondents provide a "snap -shot" of the larger businesses in the Puget Sound region (see Table 1): • There were a fair number with over 150 (10%), and with 81 to 150 (28%) employees. • More were inside the Seattle city limits than in any other region (41%). The second most popular location was the Eastside (26%). • Most were professional services (32%), wholesale/distributors (19%), or consumer services (10%). Note: Here and throughout this report, percentages may not add to 100%, due to rounding. NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: CURRENT LOCATION TYPE OF BUSINESS 10% Over 150 28% 81-150 36% 51-80 26% Under 50 14% N. King, S. Snohomish 41% Seattle 26% Eastside 19% S. King 32% Professional Services 19% Wholesale / Distributing 10% Consumer Services 8% Construction 6% Retail 5% Non -Profit 3% Media 3% Manufacturing 14% other Sources of News and Information Total (157) North (17) Seattle (63) Eastside (40) South (34) Puget Sound Business Journal 64 65 62 70 59 Seattle Times 41 41 41 53 26 Trade Publications/Associations 41 41 41 40 38 Seattle Post-Intelligencer 29 12 40 30 18 King County Journal 10 24 2 28 0 Internet 10 0 11 8 15 May 2005 Et ELWRV RESERRCH, INC., i RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 4 KEY FINDINGS ♦ General familiarity with Renton was high: • Half (49%) had been to Renton within the past month. • Many (24%) had heard something directly about doing business in Renton. This was only slightly fewer than had heard from Bellevue (29%). • Almost half (43%) had heard the slogan "Renton: Ahead of the Curve." This was even higher on the eastside (50%). • When asked what "Renton: Ahead of the Curve" meant to them, most correctly interpreted it as a mix of reference to the S-curves (27%), being progressive/tech (22%) and/or changing/growing (17%). ♦ There were few negative opinions of Renton: • When asked on their own what came to mind when they heard the word "Renton," very few said something negative (under 9% each saying "industrial/blue collar," "low-income," and the "traffic.") • The most frequent response ("Boeing," by 36%) was neutral. ♦ There is opportunity to capture moving businesses - 45% said that they are likely to move within the next five years. Over a quarter (28%) had moved in the past five years. ♦ Moving to Renton specifically is a possibility for quite a few: 8% said that they were "very likely" to consider moving their business to Renton. • Another 20% said that it is possible. ♦ However, there is strong resistance to moving far from current locations: • From a list of reasons for locating a business read to the respondents, two of the top five had to do with current proximity ("close to customers" was #1, "close to employees" was 4th, and proximity to the respondent's own home 5th in importance.) • "We're already well located" was the 2nd most frequently given drawback to doing business in Renton (19%). May 2005 Et ELWRYRESERRCH, mr., I RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 5 ♦ Addressing the issues of Renton's traffic congestion perception and selling ease of transportation are key: From the list of reasons for locating a business read to the respondents, two of the top four in importance dealt with efficient transportation ("for freight/cargo" was 2nd and "for commuters" was 4th .) • When asked in their own words what the biggest drawback would be to being located in Renton, more businesses (35%) said something about the traffic/commute than any other category. • There is a base for improving this perception, as another 38% brought up Renton's central location/accessibility/transportation as advantages that the city could offer their business. ♦ Another opportunity is promoting Renton's "quality of life for employees." • Quality of life was the 2^d most important factor for locating businesses (7.1 on average on a 10-point scale, from a pre-set list). • However, perceptions of Renton's quality of life lag behind its importance: The average rating of Renton's quality of life was 5.9, with another 43% saying that they didn't know. ■ It cannot be known exactly how respondents define "quality of life"; however, "having good public schools" - arguably a component - was one of the city's lowest ratings (an average 5.1 out of those answering, with another half saying that they didn't know.) ♦ The local government can have a great impact on Renton's desirability: • "Competitive local business taxes and fees" and "a well -run local government" were ranked numbers one and three in importance (8.1 and 7.0 on average, on the 1-10 scale.) • More than half of all respondents (58% and 59%) said they didn't know enough to rate Renton on these two important factors. • Among those who did offer a rating for the city, the average scores were 6.6 and 5.7, which were respectable, but not the city's highest. ♦ Another local attribute with good potential for marketing is the affordable real estate. • This was one of Renton's two most highly rated factors (6.7 on average, on the 1-10- scale.) It was also the factor with the fewest businesses saying that they "didn't know" (29%). • This factor was also relatively important to the businesses (6.5 in importance, or 4th out of eight on the list.) May 2005 M EL WRV RESERRCH, INC, I RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 6 ♦ Some of what might have been perceived as Renton's strengths are actually of lesser importance to these businesses: • From the lists of reasons for locations read to them, respondents rated proximity to Sea-Tac toward the bottom. • "Having a regional medical center" was rated as one of Renton's top two community attributes (an average 6.7 on the 10-point scale.) And it was one of the two factors where the fewest respondents said "don't know" (34%). • However, having "a regional medical facility," and "a college nearby that provides training and re-training," received two of the lowest importance ratings (5.4 and 4.4). ♦ Focusing on the service industries may be most successful: Across this group of businesses of mostly 35+ employees, "professional services" was the dominant type (32%). Another 10% were consumer services. • "Professional services" (including health care, legal, financial and marketing) was also the most prevalent category of business in the group that would consider relocating to Renton (they comprised 36%). ♦ The Puget Sound Business Journal is a clear choice for reaching the business leaders - 64% of all respondents said that they look to the Journal for information pertaining to their business. The preference for the Journal holds true over all of the geographic regions. May 2005 EtELwgv REsERRCH, iw., I RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 7 SUMMARY Toward the beginning of the survey, the respondents were asked if their company would be likely to move in the next year or five years. 19% said that they would be likely to move within the year, and 45% are likely to move within five years. Companies in no particular region or of any certain type were more likely to think of moving than any other. The business leaders were then read a list of reasons why people locate their companies where they do and asked to rate each on a 0-10 scale:' - Proximity (to customers and employees) was a factor in two out of four top reasons. These included: • "It is close to your customers" (rated "10" by 19%, and 6-9 by another 24%. ) • "Your business be close to your current employees" (14% and 52%). Transportation infra -structure issues were also twice in the top four, specifically: . "There is efficient transportation for commuters" (14% and 52%). . "There is efficient transportation for freight and cargo (15% and 36%). The least important reasons, with only around a quarter or fewer giving them ratings of "six" or over were the nearness of suppliers, Sea-Tac Airport, and other, similar businesses. This is not surprising, given the number of service companies included. 'Where "zero" meant "not at all important," and "10" meant "very important." May 2005 a ELwRY RESEARCH, INC., I RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 8 IMPORTANT COMMUNITY ATTRIBUTES When asked how important a list of variables about the community was in their location decisions, issues of local government topped the list: • More than a third (36%) rated "competitive local business taxes and fees" a "10" on the one -to -ten scale, and another 51% rated it a six to nine. • Two of five (22%) rated "a well -run local government" a 10, and another 44% rated it six to nine. Other variables were substantially less likely to be rated a 10, including the "quality of life," having "affordable rents and real estate prices," and a "nearby regional medical center." Each of these was given the highest importance rating by only one in 10 (10% to 12%). Least important were "good public schools," "quality amenities," and "a college nearby that provides training and re-training for employees." • Each of these was rated a "ten" by fewer than 10% (8%, 7%, and 4%, respectively.) • "Quality amenities, like restaurants, parks, and health clubs" did at least get a six to nine rating from over half (53%) of businesses. First hand knowledge was high: Almost half (49%) had been to Renton within the past month including 29% who had been in the city within the past week. Only 15% had not been to Renton in five years or more. Business people from South King County were most likely to have been to Renton in the past month: 76%, compared to 55% of Eastsiders, 38% of Seattle respondents, and 30% in the north end. Direct Communication From / About Renton: A quarter (24%) of these business people had heard something directly about doing business in Renton. This included none of the 17 businesses north of Seattle . May 2005 Et ELWRV JZESERRCH, INC., RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Those who had heard from Renton were most likely to say it was on the radio (41% of those responding.) This computes to about 10% of all the businesses hearing and having it been from radio. The likelihood to have heard about doing business in Renton did not vary across different sized businesses, but did vary by region somewhat: Renton's saturation seems deepest in the Eastside (30% had heard). Bellevue's numbers are driven up by the finding that 55% of Eastside businesses said they had heard directly about doing business in Bellevue. Bellevue's reach was lowest in the south (12%). Renton "Top of Mind" More than a third of respondents said that the first thing that comes to mind when they think of Renton is "Boeing" (36%). This was over three times as many as mentioned any other aspect of the city. Encouragingly, few said anything negative. These included: • "Industrial/blue collar" (8%), • "Low income/trashy" (6%), and • Something about the traffic or one-way streets (6%). Some respondents (5%) did mention the "Ahead of the Curve" slogan before being prompted. "Renton - Ahead of the Curve:" Almost half (43%) said that they had heard the slogan when asked directly. Recall was highest on the Eastside, where 50% had heard the phrase, compared to 29% of businesses in the North End, 43% in Seattle, and 38% in South King County. The meaning seemed to come across as intended: • Business people said that the term made them think of the S-curves/ 1-405 (27%), progressive/high tech connections (22%), and/or that Renton is redefining/changing/growing (17%). . Few had a negative reaction (8% said "marketing fluff.") May 2005 a ELWRV RESERRCH, INC.. II RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 10 One of Renton's strongest points for businesses is clearly the central location/ accessibility/transportation advantages. Nearly 4 in 10 (38%) volunteered location when asked what Renton could offer a business like theirs. This impression was strongest in the south (41%) and Eastside (35%). The next most common answer, "lower property prices," was significantly lower at 16% (22% said "nothing.") The biggest drawback seems to be the traffic/commute. More than a third (35%) said, in their own words, that traffic would be the biggest drawback for businesses such as theirs. This includes half (56%) of the South County businesses; however, these data are based on only 34 respondents, so are somewhat unreliable. The next most common reply when asked about "drawbacks" was instead a statement that they were "already well located" (19%). Asked to rate Renton on a list of other specific factors, respondents rated Renton as "good" (6-9 on the 0-10 scale) for: • Affordable housing or real estate prices (62%). • Having a regional medical facility (53%). • Being near a college that provides training and re-training for employees (31%). For most of the other attributes, around half (42% to 59%) of the businesses simply "didn't know" how to rate Renton. There were few negative scores. However, one in five did give Renton scores below a five on having "good public schools." Fewer than 10% rated Renton "excellent" (10) for any of the attributes. May 2005 EZELwRvRESERRCH, INC., RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 11 Ratings Compared to Importance It is useful to compare respondent ratings of Renton on these factors with the importance ratings they gave to those same factors: Most useful are the items where Renton's rating did not quite match up to the importance of the factor, indicating areas where improvements in the city's reputation could make the most difference to businesses. These are: • "Being competitive in terms of local business taxes and fees" (8.1 in importance, vs. 6.6 performance rating); 2 • "Quality of life" (7.1 vs. 5.9); and • "Having a well -run city government" (7.0 vs. 5.7) • "Quality amenities, like restaurants, parks, health clubs" (6.2 vs. 5.5). The best "matches" came for • "Affordable rents or real estate prices" — Renton was given an average 6.7 on the 0-10 scale (a tie for the highest average rating) and the factor was a 6.5 in importance • "A quality public school system (5.1 and 5.2). Renton's rating exceeded the importance ratings for the remaining two factors: • "Having a regional medical facility" (6.7 vs. 5.4); and • "Being near a college that provides training and re-training of employees" (5.7 vs. 5.4). Awareness Varies by Area The tendency to say that they "didn't know" Renton well enough to give certain ratings varied by the location of the business (see Table 4): The Seattle and Eastside businesses were the most likely to not know how to rate Renton on "having competitive taxes and fees" (48% and 53%) and local government (40% and 45%). The northern businesses were particularly in the dark about Renton's quality of life (29% said "don't know"), affordable real estate (35%) and quality amenities (29%). 2 The averages are only among those who answered, omitting the extensive number who said that they "don't know." May 2005 CV ELIIIRV RESERRCH, INC., I RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN _ 12 Table 4 Those Who "Didn't Know" About Top Attributes3 Total (157) North (17) Seattle (63) Eastside (40) South (34) Competitive taxes/fees 41 41 48 53 18 Quality of Life 17 29 21 10 15 Well -Run Government 35 41 40 45 15 Affordable rents/real estate 13 35 11 10 9 Quality Amenities 13 29 14 5 12 If they were to move their business: • Almost one in ten (8% of all respondents) said that they were "very likely" to consider Renton. . Another 20% said "It is possible." Interestingly, this finding did not vary geographically. For example, south county businesses were essentially as likely to say they were very likely to consider Renton (17%) as say "not at all likely" (21%). The only exception was that none of the North End businesses said that they were "very likely to move to Renton." However two (11%) of those in the North End did say it was possible. Possibility of Relocation by Business Profile Some variation in likelihood to consider Renton can be seen when considering business size and type (see Tables 5 and 6). The largest businesses (81 employees or more) were more likely to consider Renton than dismiss the possibility. . Almost half (45%) of those who said that they would at least consider Renton had over 80 employees. This compares to 32% of those who said "not at all." • Companies of 50 or under employees were more likely to say "not at all." Although they comprise 26% of all the businesses, they account for 32% of those who said "not at all" and only 20% of those who said it was possible/very likely. 3 Only factors that were in the top four of importance overall are included on the table. May 2005 Et ELWRYRESERITCN, INC., RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Table 5 Likelihood of Relocation by Business Size # of Employees Likely to Consider Renton? Total (157) Possible/Very4 (44) Not Very (50) Not at All (63) 50 and under 26% 20% 24% 32% 51-80 36% 34% 36% 37% 81+ 38% 45% 40% 32% Of those who would consider Renton: 36% are in professional services (financial, legal, health, etc.). This compares to only 16% in the wholesale or distribution businesses; and 14% in consumer services. Table 6 Likelihood of Relocation by Business Type Type of Business Likely to Consider Renton? Possible/Very (44) Not Very (50) Not at All (63) Professional Services 36% 34% 27% Wholesale/Distribution 16% 18% 22% Consumer Services 14% 6% 10% Construction 9% 6% 8% Retail 5% 10% 5% other 20% 26% 28% 4 "Very likely" (12 respondents) and "It is possible" responses were combined to give a more reliably -sized group. 13 May 2005 C'C ELIURYRESERRM, IN[., I RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 14 DISCUSSION It is encouraging that many businesses are familiar with Renton, have heard the "Ahead of the Curve" slogan, and are interpreting the slogan correctly. They harbor very few negative opinions of the city, but, on the other hand, are unaware of some of its advantages. Renton's location works for it and against it. It is thought to be "central" by many, but others bemoan the commute. For many businesses, dependent on a certain clientele and employee pool, it may never be feasible to move far. However, enough companies are actively thinking of moving, and enough would consider Renton to make fertile ground for more marketing. The prevalence of service businesses (mainly professional services, but including consumer services as well) should be kept in 'mind when promoting the city. Not only are these the most prevalent types of businesses in the area, but they are the most likely types to say they would consider moving to Renton. Wholesale and distribution companies were the second most prevalent overall, but none of these said that they were "very likely" to consider the city. There is a strong perception of traffic problems and congestion in Renton, which should be addressed. Some attributes of the area, such as the regional medical center, nearby technical college, and proximity to the airport, do not seem to be of the highest importance to most businesses, although they are seen as Renton strong points. Thus, the marketing should probably lead with other points or connect these factors to more pertinent decision points. Aspects of local governance (including taxes and fees) are of great importance, and are the types of factors which can be promoted or explained. Half of the businesses know nothing of Renton's performance on these important governance attributes, and thus there is great opportunity for improvement. There is a decent perception of Renton's real estate prices, a community factor that is also relatively important to businesses. Still, most think Renton only "good" on affordability, so improvement here is possible. Finally, although knowledge of Renton did vary geographically, businesses across the region were most likely to say that they read the Puget Sound Business Journal. This provides an excellent vehicle for reaching the entire central Puget Sound region with more clarification as to the advantages to locating businesses in Renton. May 2005 a ELWRYRESERRcH, INC., RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Summary: Potential Messages Several potential messages emerged from these interviews. Of course, the marketing messages need to be a combination of what matters most to the businesses and what the facts are regarding the advantages in Renton. For example, whether or not Renton's government is more "business friendly" than other cities, and in what ways, needs to be established before a marketing campaign calling Renton "the most business friendly" city government would be credible. That being said, the themes with the greatest potential are: . That Renton's government is "business friendly" in terms of fees, taxes, permits, etc. • The location is central for those drawing business from a broad geographic region (central Puget Sound, including Seattle, the Eastside, and Tacoma). • A mixture of economics, promoting the customer base as being affluent enough to support services, yet with real estate prices low enough to be affordable to businesses and their employees. • Whatever can be said to combat the impression of traffic congestion. This may mean focusing on the highways and arterials that link Renton, and take attention away from the "S Curves." n Charts of major findings are presented In the following section May 2005 CC ELWRYRESERRCN, Mr., ENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 16 Respondent Position with Company Q1: What is your title? Vice -President President / Owner Other Managers Office Manager CEO CFO Other Directors May 2005 i ELl/wRvREsEmrm,mC: ' IRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Description of Business Q2: How many full-time or full-time equivalent employees to you have at this location? Number of Employees ■ Under 50 ® 51-80 ■ 81-150 ■151+ Type of Business Professional Services Wholesale / Distribution Consumer Services Construction Retail • ' Non-profit Agency ' Media Ir Manufacturing Other 17 May 2005 Et EL WRVRESERRCH,INC. I[RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 18 Years at Current Location ?N, Q5: The next couple of questions are about the location of your business. How long have you been at your current location? ■ <5 ® 6-10 ■ 11-20 ■ 20+ May 2005 EZ ELWRYRESERRrH,INC IIRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Likely to Relocate Business Q6: How likely do think you would be to move your business, or open another location, in the next year? Would you say... Within the Next Year Within Next 5 Years ■ Very Likely ® Not Very Likely ■ Not Likely ■ DK ■ Very Likely ® Not Very Likely ■ Not Likely ■ DK / Not Asked 19 May 2005 M ELBIRvRESERRLH,isr. ' [RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 20 Current Location: Important Factors Q8: I'm going to read you a list of various reasons why people locate their businesses where they do, and ask you to rate each on a scale of zero to 10, where zero means it is Not At All Important to you, and 10 means it is Extremely Important. If you were looking today for a location for your business, how important would it be that... ■ Very ® 6-9 ❑ No Opin ■ 1-4 ■ Not 19% 24% 22% 15% 15% 36% 22% 18% 14% 52% • ' , 12% 6°/ 10% 46% • ' 13% 8% - - 8% 37% ' ' 20% 12% • • - - . 25% ' ' 34% 20% 16% li 33% 28% 12% • ' 40% 31 % May 2005 Et ELIURV RESERRCH, Mr. IRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 21 Important Community Factors Q9: The next group of variables has to do with the community in which your business is located. Using the same scale, how important is it for the location of your business that the community where your business is located has... ■ Very ® 6-9 ❑ No Opin s 1-4 ■ Not Competitive • , . 51% o/ 04 Taxes/Fees Well -Run Government Quality of Life ' . ' . Affordable Housing% 13' Regional Medical .. 28%• ' Facility 34 Good Public , , 7% . , Schools Quality Amenities ' • ' , 21 % ' ' ' Nearby Training • ' . ' ' 18% • ' ' ' May 2005 Et ELumvRESEARCH,mr. IRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Sources of Business News, Information Q4: What are some local sources you use for news and information that affects your business? Puget Sound Biz Journal ' Seattle Times Trade Pubs / Assns Seattle P-1 Eastside Journal ' Internet 1 ' Wall Street Journal • ' , Word of Mouth Radio ■ 6% Television 05% Everett Herald 12% Tacoma News -Tribune 12% So. County Journal12% Local Biz Publications 12% • 22. May 2005 EZELWRYRESF.RRcH,INC. IIRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Heard from Cities in Region? NNINWW�III Q10: Several cities in the Puget Sound Region have active Economic Development efforts underway to attract new businesses to their community. Have you heard anything directly from, or about doing business in the following communities: Bellevue Renton SeaTac Auburn Lynnwood Federal Way 23 May 2005 Et EUBRvRESEmwgINC. [RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN "Renton - Ahead of the Curve" Heard the slogan? ■ Yes ■ No What Does it Mean to You? S-Curves Progressive / High Tech Refining / Changing / Growing Competition / Innovation Catchy / Funny / Clever * 24 Marketing Fluff ; • , Q13: When you hear that slogan, what does it mean to you? "Renton - Ahead of the Curve?" No Answer May 2005 R ELwRvREsmRcH,mr. [RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Source of Info About Renton Q10: Do you recall where you heard about Renton? [n=37] Radio Newspaper Word of Mouth Mail Magazine M Television Fax / Email Don't Recall Last Visit to Renton Within Last Week - Within Last Month - Last 6 Months In Last Year In Last 5 Years More than 5 Years Never M. May 2005 25 ERELwRv RESERRCH, /NC. IREN"TON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Renton Top of Mind Impression Q11: When you think of Renton, what is the first thing that comes to mind? Boeing Location Many Amenities Industrial / Blue Collar Low Income / Trashy Traffic / One Way Streets Ahead of the Curve S-Curves Answers by Region (% giving each answer)* Boeing Location Amenities Industrial Low Income Traffic Ahead of Curve S-Curves North Seattle Eastside South am a ■tea a oa a as a 26, * It should be noted that these cell percentages are based on a small number of respondents and therefore are not statistically significant. May 2005 Et ELwRvxEsERRCH,mr. ' IRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Renton Strong Points (unaided) Q15: What would you say are some strong points that Renton might have to offer a business like yours? Central Location / Transportation Property Prices Lower Good Property / Availability M Good Neighbors M Community Need for Business M Accessibility to Services S. Nothing Don't Know 27 May 2005 ER ELwRYRESERRCH, mr. ' IRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 28 Renton Drawbacks (unaided) Q16: What would be some drawbacks about Renton for a business like yours? Traffic / Commute Location / Too Far * Alerady Well Located ' No Need for Our Type of Biz M Negative Image , Theft Labor / Business Costs Nothing Don't Know * Contained within this category: Too far from customers/suppliers (15%), Location, Non-specific (7%), Too far from employees (5%). May 2005 Fi ELwRvRESERR[H,mr. « 1 IRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Rating Renton Q17: I'd like to go back to some of the items I read before, and ask you to rate Renton on each of the factors. Again, use the zero to 10 scale, where zero now means you would rate Renton as extremely poor on that factor, and 10 means Renton is excellent. Regional Medical Facility Competitive Taxes/Fees Well -Run Government Affordable Housing Quality of Life Good Public Schools Nearby Training Quality Amenities ■ Very ® 6-9 D No Opin ■ 1-4 ■ Not 58% 59% 52% 43% 41% 42% 29 May 2005 R ELWRYRESERRCH,IAC. IRENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN Location Factors: Rating Importance vs. Renton Q9xl7: Important for location of business and how Renton rates on those factors: Competitive Taxes/Fees Quality of Life Well -Run Government Affordable Housing ■ Important to Me ■ Rating Renton 5.9 7.1 5.7 7.0 Quality Amenities Regional Medical Facility • Good Public Schools Nearby Training , 30 May 2005 Et ELWRYRESERRCH mr. I[RENTON COMMUNITY MARKETING CAMPAIGN 31 Likely to Move Business to Renton Q18: If you were to move your business, or open a new location, how likely would you be to consider Renton as a possible location? ■ Very Likely ® It is Possible ■ Not Very Likely ■ Not Likely May 2005 EZ ELwnv RESEARCH, /NC. QUESTIONNAIRE WITH DATA Lq ELWBVRESERRCH, INC. Renton "Ahead of the Curve" TOPLINE PAGE 1 TOPLINE DATA This summary presents response frequency distributions for the survey of Eastside Business Executives on behalf of the Renton Community Marketing Campaign. Telephone interviews were completed with 158 executives of businesses with at least 35 employees, located in King and Snohomish Counties. The interviews were conducted by telephone between April 27 and May 6, 2005. The interview lasted an average of 12 minutes. If this were a strictly random sample, the overall margin of sampling error would be approximately t8%. That means, in theory, there is a 95% probability that the results of this survey are within t8% of the results that would have been obtained by interviewing executives in all similar business in the two counties. However, since the cooperation rate was only 19%, the margin of error should not be applied to these results. data are presented here in the same order the questions were asked in the interview. figures in bold type are percentages of respondents who gave each answer. :entages may not add to 100% due to rounding. 1 What is your title? GENDER: MALE ... 72 FEMALE ... 28 President/Owner... 22 CEO (Chief Executive Officer) ... 5 COO (Chief Operating Officer)... 3 CFO (Chief Financial Officer) ... 5 Office Manager ... 18 Vice -President... 25 Other Managers ...19 Other Directors ... 5 2 How many full-time or full-time equivalent employees to you have at this location? AVERAGE (MEAN) NUMBER =108 MEDIAN = 70 3 How would you classify your business? Are you in... Professional services (health, legal, financial, marketing, etc.) ... 32 Wholesale and Distribution ... 19 Consumer services (hotels, restaurants, fitness) ... 10 Construction... 8 Retail ... 6 Non-profit agency... 5 Media ... 3 Manufacturing... 3 Other ... 14 TOPLINE.doc 4/15/05 ELWRV RESERRCH, INC. Renton "Ahead of the Curve" TOPLINE PAGE 2 4 What are some local sources you use for news and information that affects your business? [PROBE FOR SPECIFIC SOURCE] Puget Sound Business Journal 64 Seattle Times ... 41 Trade Publications / Associations ... 41 Seattle P-1...29 Internet...10 Eastside Journal...10 Wall Street Journal 9 Word-Of-Mouth/Friends/Business Associates 8 Radio 6 Television 5 Everett Herald ... 2 Tacoma News -Tribune ... 2 So. County Journal ... 2 Local Business Publications ... 2 5 The next couple of questions are about the location of your business. How long have you been at your current location? AVERAGE (MEAN) -16 YRS MEDIAN = 11 YRS 6 How likely do think you would be to move your business, or open another location, in the next year? Would you say... SKIP TO 08E VERY LIKELY ... 19 NOT VERY LIKELY ... 33 7 In the next five years [n=128] NOT AT ALL LIKE LY... 47 [DK/NA]... 1 VERY LIKELY ... 26 NOT VERY LIKELY ... 23 NOT AT ALL LIKELY ... 28 [DK/NA]... 24 TOPLINE.doc 4/15/05 ELWRVRESERRCH, ►NC. Renton "Ahead of the Curve" TOPLINE PAGE 3 8 I'm going to read you a list of various reasons why people locate their businesses where they do, and ask you to rate each on a scale of zero to 10, where zero means it is Not At All Important to you, and 10 means it is Extremely Important. If you were looking today for a location for your business, how important would it be that... ROTATE NOT ..................................................... VERY mean 1. Your business be close where you live yourself...........................................0....1 ... 2....3... 4.... ®....6 ...7....8 ... 9...10 5.1 2. Your business be close to your current employees.............................................0....1 ... 2.... 3 ... 4.... 5 ... ®... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....5.8 3. Your suppliers are nearby ......................0....1 ... 2.... 3 ... ® ... 5 ....6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....3.7 4. It be close to similar types of businesses................................................0....1 ... ®... 3... 4.... 5....6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....2.5 S. There is efficient transportation for freight and cargo...............................0....1... 2.... 3... 4.... 5... ®... 7 ....8 ... 9 ...10 ....5.1 6. There is efficient transportation for commuters........................................0....1 ... 2.... 3 ... 4.... 5 ....6 ... 8 ... 9...10 ....6.4 7. It is close to Sea-Tac Airport ...................0....1 ... ® ... 3 ... 4.... 5....6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....3.0 8. It is close to your customers ...................0....1 ... 2.... 3... 4.... ®.... 6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....5.2 9 The next group of variables has to do with the community in which your business is located. Using the same scale, how important is it for the location of your business that the community where your business is located has... ROTATE NOT ..................................................... VERYmean 1. A regional medical facility.....................0....1 ... 2....3... 4.... ®....6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....5.4 2. A college nearby that provides training and re-training for employees. ..0 .... 1 ... 2.... 3... 4E]5....6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....4.4 3. A quality public school system...............0....I ... 2....3... 4.... ®.... 6 ...7....8 ... 9...10 ....5.1 4. Affordable rents & real estate prices ...... 0.... 1... 2....3... 4.... 5....6 ...8 ... 9...10 ....6.5 5. A good quality of life for your employees.......................................0....1 ... 2....3... 4....5....6 ...8....8 ... 9...10 ....7.1 6. Quality amenities, like restaurants, parks, and health clubs............................0....1... 2....3... 4....5....6 ...8....8 ... 9...10 ....6.2 7. A well -run local government ..................0....1 ... 2.... 3 ... 4.... 5 ....6 ... 7... ®... 9...10 ....7.0 8. Competitive local business taxes and fees...................................................0....1 ... 2.... 3 ... 4.... 5 ....6 ... 7 ....8 ... M...10 .... 8.1 TOPLINE.doc 4/15/05 ELWRV R.ESERRCH, INC. Renton "Ahead of the Curve" TOPLINE PAGE 4 10 Several cities in the Puget Sound Region have active Economic Development efforts underway to attract new businesses to their community. Have you heard anything directly from, or about doing business in the following communities: 10.1 Lynnwood....................................................................................12 10.2 Auburn........................................................................................13 10.3 Federal Way...............................................................................13 10.4 SeaTac.........................................................................................16 10.5 Bellevue.......................................................................................29 10.6 Renton..........................................................................................24 10.6.a IF YES: Do you recall where you heard about Renton? (N=37] RADIO ... 41 NEWSPAPER ... 24 WORD OF MOUTH ... 16 MAIL ... 11 MAGAZINE... 5 TELEVISION...3 FAX/EMAIL... 3 DON'T RECALL 11 11 When you think of Renton, what is the first thing that comes to mind? BOEING...36 LOCATION ... 10 MANY AMENITIES ... 10 INDUSTRIAL / BLUE COLLAR ... 8 LOW INCOME / TRASHY ... 6 TRAFFIC / ONE-WAY STREETS ... 6 AHEAD OF THE CURVE ... 5 S-CURVES... 5 12 Have you heard the slogan: "Renton — Ahead of the Curve?" YES ... 42 13 When you hear that slogan, what does it mean to you? "Renton — Ahead of the Curve?" S-CURVES... 27 PROGRESSIVE / HI TECH ... 22 REDEFINING / CHANGING / GROWING ... 17 COMPETITION / INNOVATION ... 10 CATCHY / FUNNY / CLEVER ... 9 MARKETING FLUFF ... 8 NO ANSWER ... 10 TOPLINE.doc 4/15/05 ELWRVRESERRCH, INC. Renton "Ahead of the Curve" TOPLINE PAGE 5 14 The next few questions are about Renton. How long has it been since the last time you were in Renton? Within The Last Week ... 29 Within The Last Month ... 20 Within The Last 6 Months...22 Within The Last Year ... 14 Within The Last 5 Years ... 10 More Than 5 Years Ago ... 2 Never...3 15 What would you say are some strong points that Renton might have to offer a business like yours? ACCESSIBILITY TO COMMUNITY ... 33 PROPERTY PRICES LOWER ... 16 GOOD PROPERTY / VIEWS / AVAILABILITY...6 GOOD NEIGHBORS...6 COMMUNITY NEED FOR BUSINESS ... 6 LOCATION...5 ACCESSIBILITY TO SERVICES ... 3 NOTHING ... 22 DON'T KNOW ... 8 16 What would be some drawbacks about Renton for a business like yours? TRAFFIC / COMMUTE ... 36 ALREADY WELL LOCATED ... 19 NOT MAINSTREAM / OUT OF LOOP ... 16 LOCATION...7 NO NEED FOR OUR TYPE OF BIZ ... 6 TOO FAR FOR EMPLOYEES ... 6 NEGATIVE IMAGE ... 6 THEFT ... 3 LABOR / BIZ COSTS ... 3 NOTHING ... 7 DON'T KNOW ... 7 TOPLINE.doc 4/15/05 ELWRV RESERRCH, INC. Renton "Ahead of the Curve" TOPLINE PAGE 6 17 I'd like to go back to some of the items I read before, and ask you to rate Renton on each of the factors. Again, use the zero to 10 scale, where zero now means you would rate Renton as extremely poor on that factor, and 10 means Renton is excellent. First, what about ROTATENOT ..................................................... VERYMEAN 1. Having a regional medical facility . ........ 0.... 1 ... 2.... 3... 4....5....6 ... M.... 8 ... 9...10 ....6.7 2. Being near a college that provides training and re-training for employees. ..0 .... 1 ... 2.... 3 ... 4.... 5 ... ®... 7 ....8 ... 9...10 ....5.7 3. Having a quality public school system ...0....1 ... 2.... 3... 4.... ®.... 6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....5.2 4. Affordable rents or real estate prices .....0....1... 2.... 3... 4.... 5....6 ...8 ... 9...10 ....6.7 5. Offering a good quality of life for your employees.......................................0....1 ... 2.... 3 ... 4.... 5 ... ®... 7 ....8 ... 9 ...10 ....5.9 6. Including quality amenities, like restaurants, parks, and health clubs ......... 0.... 1 ... 2....3... 4.... ®....6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....5.5 7. Having a well -run local government ...... 0 .... 1 ... 2....3... 4.... ®....6 ... 7....8 ... 9...10 ....5.7 8. Being competitive in terms of local business taxes and fees............................0....1 ... 2.... 3... 4.... 5....6 ... 18 If you were to move your business, or open a new location, how likely would you be to consider Renton as a possible location? Would you say VERY LIKELY ... 8 IT IS POSSIBLE ... 20 NOT VERY LIKELY ... 32 NOT AT ALL LIKELY ... 40 [DK/NA] ... 9 18.1 Would you mind if someone from Renton contacted you to talk about this in more detail? OK TO CALL [ N=141 TOPLINE.doc 4/15/05 ELWRYRESERRCH, INC. Renton "Ahead of the Curve" TOPLINE PAGE 7 Q4 Source of Busienss information Pct of Category label Count Cases Seattle Times 64 40.8 Seattle P-I 45 28.7 Eastside Journal 16 10.2 Everett Herald 3 1.9 Tacoma News Tribune 3 1.9 Wall Street Journal 14 8.9 Puget Snd Biz Journal 100 63.7 Trade Pub/Associations 65 41.4 TV 7 4.5 Radio 9 5.7 Friends/Associates 12 7.6 South County Journal 3 1.9 Local Community Pubs 3 1.9 Internet 15 9.6 Flyers/Brochures 1 .6 Only Affected By Govt 1 .6 Western 1 .6 National News Pubs 2 1.3 Phonebooks 2 1.3 None/Nothing 2 1.3 Q11 Renton Top of Mind Pct of Category label Count Cases Boeing 56 35.7 South Center Mall 3 1.9 Location 16 10.2 Growth/Revitalization 5 3.2 Trashy/Low Income 9 5.7 Congested/Overcrowded 2 1.3 Good People/Population 5 3.2 Low Rent 1 .6 Too Far From Me 5 3.2 Industrial/Blue Collar 12 7.6 Small Town 5 3.2 Many Amenities 16 10.2 Property Available 3 1.9 Airport/Airplanes 6 3.8 Ahead of the Curve/Competition 7 4.5 Traffic/One Way Streets 9 5.7 Car Dealerships 2 1.3 S-Curves 7 4.5 Longacres/Horse Racing 1 .6 Middle Class 1 .6 None/Nothing 1 .6 Other 1 .6 DK/NA 2 1.3 TOPLINE.doc 4/15/05 ELWRV RESERRCH, INC. Renton "Ahead of the Curve" TOPLINE PAGE 8 A Q13 What Does "Ahead of the Curve" Mean to You Category label Pct of Count Cases S-curves 42 26.8 Catchy/Funny/Clever 14 8.9 Progressive/High Tech 34 21.7 Redefining/Changing/Growing 26 16.6 Good Supply of Workers 1 .6 Competition/Innovation 15 9.6 Location 3 1.9 Vague 3 1.9 Not True/Marketing Fluff 12 7.6 Still Work to be Done 3 1.9 Distance/Travel Issues 2 1.3 None/Nothing 11 7.0 DK/NA 5 3.2 Q15 Renton Strong Points Pct of Category label Count Cases Location 8 5.1 Accessibility to Services 5 3.2 Accessibility to Community 51 32.5 Property Prices Lower 25 15.9 Promotes Biz/Comm Support 10 6.4 Revitalization of Downtown 3 1.9 Good Property/Views/Availability 9 5.7 Good Neighbors 10 6.4 Community Need for Biz 9 5.7 Have Considered Future Move 4 2.5 Closer to My Competition 3 1.9 Population(General) 4 2.5 Available Workforce 1 .6 None/Nothing 35 22.3 DK/NA 12 7.6 Q16 Renton Drawbacks Pct of Category label Count Cases Location 11 7.1 Too Crowded 2 1.3 Traffic/Commute 54 34.6 Not Mainstream/Out of Loop 24 15.4 Neg Image/Hard to Deal With 8 5.1 Too Much Empty/Vacant Offices 1 .6 No Need for This Type Biz 10 6.4 Already Well Located 29 18.6 Too Far for Employees 8 5.1 Real Estate Too Expensive 4 2.6 Lot of Work to Do First 1 .6 Labor/Biz Costs 4 2.6 Theft 5 3.2 Need More Warehouses/Buildings 3 1.9 Nothing/NA 12 7.7 Other 1 .6 Dont Know 11 7.1 TOPLINE.doc 4/15/05 ELWRMRESERRCH, /NC. A City of Renton PUBLIC INFORMATION HANDOUT June 20, 2005 SEWER MORATORIUM FOR SEWER SERVICE TO NEW SUBDIVISIONS OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS ON THE EAST RENTON PLATEAU For additional information, please contact: Dave Christensen; City of Renton Utility Services 425.430.7212 DESCRIPTION: The City Council adopted Resolution Number 3758 on June 6, 2005, establishing a moratorium on sewer availabilities for new subdivisions on the East Renton Plateau area for an initial period of six (6) months. A map is included on the back showing the moratorium area. SUMMARY: On January 3, 2005, Council passed Ordinance 5123. This ordinance revised City code for the provision of sewer service outside City limits. This Ordinance was adopted with the understanding that while development in the County would not meet all of the City's development standards, the City could condition sewer availability to require that the most critical of the development standards be met. These standards include meeting the City of Renton's (1) adopted general land use category, (2) allowed density within the adopted land use category, and (3) allowed structure type and scale within the adopted land use category. Adoption of Ordinance 5123, also made sewer availability contingent upon the property owner executing a Covenant To Annex for the developed property. In addition to providing service within Renton's sewer service area, one of the primary reasons for the City to offer sewer availability is to promote long-term annexation through the use of the Covenants To Annex. Since the adoption of Ordinance 5123, the Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell (CARE) group has been very active in developing a potential large-scale annexation on the plateau. In its letter to Council, CARE cites issues it shares with a number of property owners within the potential annexation area who have expressed concern with the City issuing sewer availabilities that cover only the core development issues as discussed above. It would be CARE's preference that development within the moratorium area meet all of Renton's development standards including lot set -backs, lot widths, lot depths, and our newly adopted landscape standards. CARE believes that the City of Renton's adopted standards is the best approach to preserving the distinct character of life within its community. With the adoption of Resolution Number 3758, a moratorium on new sewer availabilities for new subdivisions is in place for a period of six (6) months. Council may extend the moratorium if a need still exists at the end of six months. This moratorium only affects the area shown on the attached map and only impacts proposed new subdivisions for this area. Existing lots may still receive sewer availability for a single home upon that lot. �y7Ei1-c� 3 + �� EI:��� Sewer Moratorium for Sewer Service to New Subdivisions Outside City Limits on the East Renton Plateau Resolution No. 3758 Timeline: June 2002 — Ordinance 4969. This ordinance was passed to significantly limit sewer availabilities due to two primary concerns. First was State Supreme Court decision that invalidated Petition Method Annexation and second, density concerns on the East Renton Plateau. August 2002 — Ordinance 4981. Amendment to Ordinance 4969 to allow limited availabilities for existing platted lots. January 3, 2005 — Ordinance 5123. Revised code for sewer outside the City to allow availabilities outside City with certain City standards for Land use and zoning. State Supreme Court reversed its earlier decision and City established zoning standards for the East Renton Plateau. May 9, 2005 - Letter request from Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evendell requesting a moratorium referred to Committee of the Whole. Although City had adopted certain standards that apply to new availabilities, neighborhood group concerned that not all standards are applied, and that this was hurting their efforts to form an annexation area on the Plateau. May 23, 2005 — Presentation by Staff in support of a Moratorium on Sewer Availabilities for New Subdivisions on the East Renton Plateau at Committee of the Whole and request at Council to have Resolution prepared for 6-month Moratorium at next regular Council Meeting June 6, 2005 — Council adopts Resolution No. 3758 establishing a 6-month Moratorium on Sewer Availabilities for New Subdivisions on the East Renton Plateau and establishing a Public Hearing date of June 20th. June 20, 2005 — Public Hearing Status of Availabilities for New Subdivisions - Jan. 3rd to June 6th: Davis Plat, 17 lots, 13804 162°d Avenue SE, Submitted 3/4/05, Issued 3/31/05 Miya Plat, 17 Lots, 140xx 162nd Avenue SE, Submitted 2/15/05, Issued 5/13/05 Threadgill Plat, 17 Lots, 13502 162°d Avenue SE, Submitted 6/2/05, Currently Under Review. June 16, 2005 Public HeaVin9 eorrcs vt de�rce A rcnda Tfcirr a, 6 •�D-.?GOS Living Architecture CITY OF RENTON UUN 17 2000 Terri Briere, Council President RECEIVED and City Council Members CITY CLERK'S OFFICE NB4 City of Renton Builder of 1055 S. Grady Way the Year 2003 Renton, WA 98055 Re: Public Comment Sewer Moratorium within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area Dear Madam President and City Council Members: We support the City of Renton and the Citizens' Alliance for a Responsible Evandale Over 100a (CARE) in the annexation of the East Renton Plateau area. We are concerned however, MAME Awwards , about some of the language written in the Sewer Moratorium Referendum and how it will affect our subdivision development which is located within the East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area. We have a nine acre parcel of land that is affected by this sewer moratorium. We are in partnership with American Classic Homes who also has another nine acre parcel adjacent to our development site. These two parcels will be combined to create one subdivision. We removed feasibility on our development site and paid a substantial down payment for Award 2004 this property after the City of Renton began issuing sewer certificates in January of this year. And now the City is once again not allowing sewer certificates. We are concerned about the City of Renton's language in the Sewer Moratorium Referendum allowing CARE six months to present a formal submittal for an election -- -" annexation. We feel the group should be able to get the 10 percent signatures required for formal submittal within one month. There has been an adequate amount of communication to the residents within the annexation area, including at least three BUILTE o g oomeetings EN� neighborhood in s and written material mailed to the area residents. We feel that a Member majority of the annexation process could be achieved within the six month moratorium period. Val" BIAW Builder Appreciation Award BENNETT DEVELOPMENT, INC. 12011 NE 1st St Suite 201 Bellevue WA 98005 business 425.709.6500 Journal fax: 425.709.6553 fastest Growing www.bennettdevelopment.com Company Award Below we have outlined a timeline for the annexation process we feel is attainable. • Gather 10% signatures - I month (July, 2005) • Council Review and Approval — 60 days (August - September, 2005) • County Council/Boundary Review Board Approval — 60 days (October - November, 2005) • Vote — February 2006 We would like the Sewer Moratorium Referendum written so CARE cannot use this moratorium as a means to stop growth in this area. If CARE is allowed until December 6, 2005 to submit a formal package than this annexation process could be prolonged up to one year. We feel you should not extend the Moratorium unless a formal submittal has been given to the Boundary Review Board by the beginning of October, 2005. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Sincerely, Z Theresa M. Brehmer Land Acquisition Manager Cc: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Public Aeank 6ne'rawmce A� e�da -Zkm q a, �-�o•aoos From: Bonnie Walton To: Tom Date: 6/20/2005 8:22:00 AM Subject: Re: Input to tonight's sewer moratorium hearing Dear Mr. Carpenter: Thank you for your input. A copy of your email and attachments will be forwarded to the City Council members and Mayor, and it will be entered into the record at tonight's public hearing. Sincerely, Bonnie Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> "Tom" <TDCarp@comcast.net> 6/20/2005 8:02:29 AM >>> Bonnie, The attached documents are written input to the June 20, 2005 hearing on the Sewer Moratorium for the Renton East Plateau Potential Annexation Area (PAA). I will be unable to attend the meeting in purpose. One document is a letter to the council with input specific to the hearing. The other document is a context document that focuses on the subject of Quality of Life in the PAA. Please forward both documents in the appropriate form to all members of the Renton City Council and other interested parties as you or the Council see fit. I appreciate the opportunity to provide input to this important subject. Thank you Tom Carpenter 15006 SE 139th Place Renton, WA 98059 425-271-2035 TDCarpoa comcast. net To: Renton City Council June 20, 2005 From: Tom Carpenter 15006 SE 139th PI Renton, WA 98059 As we approach the 15-year anniversary of Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA) and having just passed the 10-year anniversary of King County's alignment to GMA, the plateau east of Renton, like so many other areas, is at a crossroads. A host of emerging trends and issues challenge our core values and way of life. Without question, we face significant change in the future. How we shape such change is a matter of our own choosing. It's not clear if there is an agreed -upon vision for the plateau to help guide such choices, satisfactory participation by stakeholders and decision makers to manage such choices, or meaningful outcome measures to monitor such choices. One such choice is the sewer moratorium for the Renton East Plateau Potential Annexation Area. Purpose This letter is written input to the Renton City Council's hearing on the sewer certificate moratorium scheduled for Monday June 20, 2005. Unfortunately, I will be unable to attend the hearing in person, however, I welcome questions and feedback. Background We became interested in quality of life in the neighborhood around the time of the construction of the QFC strip mall off Duval Ave. and SE 128`h St. That construction heralded a series of noticeable changes extending mainly out the SE 128�h St. corridor although it includes residential and commercial development on both sides of Duval Ave. Since that time we've seen change on the Renton East Plateau at a significantly higher pace than we had witnessed in all the other time we had lived in the area. I spoke briefly during the Audience Comment period at the end of the Renton City Council meeting held on June 6, 2005. At the time I stressed that a fundamental concern of the East Renton Plateau area is not being addressed. If the area is annexed to Renton, the City will face the issue of how quality of life is maintained, if not improved, as the area is developed out according to the Urban Growth Area land use designation that occurs in the Growth Management Act. I also stressed that it is important to address this issue as a joint effort between the affected residents, the developers and realtors, King County, and Renton. I represent myself only and am not affiliated with any organized effort either for or against the moratorium although I support any informed efforts that are attempting to bring fact - based understanding to the citizens of the neighborhood. Comments on the sewer moratorium Although I support the moratorium, I'm concerned that, without the proper focus, we run the risk of tragically being in a worse quality of life condition at the end of the moratorium period. The moratorium is linked to the question of annexation, and the annexation decision, regardless of the outcome, will have a profound impact on the quality of life in the neighborhood. A vote to annex into Renton will place a new burden on the City of Renton to address the quality of life issue in the area while a vote to stay in Unincorporated King County will force the issue of service support by King County and will continue to leave the East Renton Plateau with representation only at the County level (currently undergoing a change because of the "re -districting" of the King County Council and the recent decision on the part of KC Council representative David Irons to run for a different County position.) For the efforts that are focused on quality of life in the area to be effective responsible participation in the issue is required by all stakeholders including county and state governments, developers, and citizens. If annexation were to occur, Renton would also become a more significant stakeholder. My concern is that the moratorium may not be sufficient action necessary to stop the current build out of the area in any meaningful way. Also, the focus that the moratorium will create on the question of annexation can be distracting to the larger issue of quality of life, an issue that has its roots in the moratorium itself. I call on the Renton City Council to add its voice to King County and the State regarding the issue of quality of life in the neighborhood they might inherit through annexation or will end up being neighbored to if the area remains in Unincorporated King County. I also call on the Council, along with King County, the State of Washington, and the local citizens to take the time created by the moratorium to produce a meaningful, agreed upon plan to address what I consider to be a critical juncture in the question of the impact on quality of life in Urban Growth Areas, like the East Renton Plateau. I also call on the Renton City Council to look into other areas that can effectively put a temporary moratorium on the build out of the East Plateau PAA. Attachment Attached is a working document used to capture descriptions of the situation in the area, a desired target state, and the beginnings of a proposal to address the overall question of quality of life in the neighborhood. This information should be considered "work in process" and is a snapshot of the thinking at this date. Next steps Along with providing input to responsible citizens groups in the neighborhood, the King County Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council has been made aware of this issue and will be receiving this input along and a briefing in mid -July, 2005. The objective at this stage is to develop high quality information with the participation of stakeholders and decision makers. I appreciate any feedback on information quality or the participants. Tom Carpenter 2 Q11afity of lffe As we approach the 15-year anniversary of Washington State's Growth Management Act (GMA) and having just passed the 10-year anniversary of King County's alignment to GMA, the plateau east of Renton, like so many other areas, is at a crossroads. A host of emerging trends and issues challenge our core values and way of life. Without question, we face significant change in the future. How we shape such change is a matter of our own choosing. It's not clear if there is an agreed - upon vision for the plateau to help guide such choices, satisfactory participation by stakeholders and decision makers to manage such choices, or meaningful outcome measures to monitor such choices. Even what can appear to be an innocuous decision, like a sewer certificate moratorium, can be an example of one such choice. 1 Summary • We are long time residents of the plateau east of Renton, sometimes called the "Renton Highlands". We first moved here in the mid-1970s and bought our current home in 1981. • We're seeing the effects of urban growth in our neighborhood. • We moved into this area choosing a quality of life based on our choice of housing and neighborhood at the time. • There are underlying forces that are causing growth to be moving into Urban Growth Areas including Renton's East Plateau. • The measure of any type of growth management is accountability to the outcome quality of life. • Using accepted analysis and influence techniques, develop an integrated plan that assures our voice and that of the neighborhood's residents, is being heard. • Growth Management is an experiment based on theories. The theories that are the basis for Growth Management are commonly called New Urbanism and Smart Growth. • Consultants bring the theories to the Decision Makers. There accountability generally ends when the contract terminates. A significant improvement would be to make them more Accountable for the Outcome. 2 Purpose The short term purpose includes stopping all development efforts until such time as an agreed upon, comprehensive plan for the area, including an emphasis on quality of life, can be developed. See Sewer Moratorium letter 3 Background My wife, Sharon, and I have been residents of the Renton East Plateau since the late 1970's, buying our current home in 1981. Our home, which is also the location of our ®2005 Carpenter & Associates I QOL0506 Rev: New 06/20/05 Quality of life businesses, lies in an area which, at the time of purchase, was part of the new construction in one of the very few residential developments outside the Renton City limits on the plateau. We became interested in quality of life in the neighborhood around the time of the construction of the QFC strip mall off Duval Ave. and SE 128th St. That construction heralded a series of noticeable changes extending mainly out the SE 1281h St. corridor although it includes residential and commercial development on both sides of Duval Ave. Since that time we've seen change on the Renton East Plateau at a significantly higher pace than we had witnessed in all the other time we had lived in the area. For 20 years we didn't experience much growth here on the plateau and the quality of life reflected the reasons we bought here in the first place. Large stands of old fir trees often spotted with maple and alder dominated the vegetation in the area. Our own yard has ten 100' fir trees with samples of spruce, alder, hemlock and pine all on slightly more than a quarter acre. Driving through the neighborhood is a little surreal because of the still - dense vegetation. Most residential property residents preserved the original plant life while adding their own concepts to the landscaping. Today the plateau still reflects its rural roots. There was very little noticeable development until roughly the time when the section of Maple Valley Highway between 144 SE and 1541h SE was converted from rural farmland into park and recreation space and residential housing. Roughly the same time, the land on either side of Duvall Ave. north of SE 128th was converted from a dense stand of tall native timber to at least three housing developments at a density considerably higher than the average on the plateau. The area also included the development of the "QFC shopping area" and the intersection of Duvall and SE 129th. Today development continues east on the plateau with dramatic changes occurring along the SE 1281h and Sunset Blvd/SR 900 corridors. Not surprisingly this has lead to increased traffic in the area mostly noticeable as increasing delays at key intersections. Ambient noise levels are noticeably higher. As residential development occurs, utility construction also increases which effects traffic flow and roadway quality. Even something as innocuous as the amount of animals becoming "road kill" is indicative of reduction in habitat for native animals. As witnesses to the land use conversion of the plateau it's easy to have feelings of loss and tragedy. As residents of the area, it's easy to have feelings of frustration over the effects on quality of life. And as property owners and tax payers in the area it's easy to have feelings of anger over the decisions being made. For long time residents, we chose to live here because of the quality of life it promised. It feels like we have no choice in changes to that quality of life. In spring, 2005 we received a meeting notice from a non-profit corporation called CARE (Citizens Alliance for a Responsible Evondale). Concerned with the quality of life changes in the neighborhood, we've attended all the CARE meetings including some of their officer's meetings. CO2005 Carpenter & Associates 2 QOL0506 Rev: New 06/20/05 i.ualih, of I Afe Recently, we've become involved in the efforts of another group, the East Renton Plateau Citizens Council who also have a position on the subject of annexation. We've also begun engaging with decision makers (e.g. Renton City Council, King County Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council) 4 About this document This document is a "snapshot" of work in progress. The Change History can help set the context of the specific version. Feedback is always welcome. 5 Objectives and Principles We became interested in quality of life in the neighborhood around the time of the construction of the QFC strip mall off Duval Ave. and SE 128t11 St. That construction heralded a series of noticeable changes extending mainly out the SE 128th St. corridor although it includes residential and commercial development on both sides of Duval Ave. Since that time we've seen change on the Renton East Plateau at a significantly higher pace than we had witnessed in all the other time we had lived in the area. Our objectives are to discover the appropriate means to influence quality of life in our neighborhood. The technique being used is based on the principle of "inclusion". This means that it is more important to include all points of view without taking a bias. The intent is to empower through accurate information. The assumption is that change is inevitable however outcomes are not. Results are based on the forces that exist that influence them. The level being used here is relatively high with detail investigations ONLY used to validate the higher context. Models are important because of the way they can enhance communication. 6 Scope and Boundaries There are multiple boundary designations in the neighborhood, including City Limits, Potential Annexation Area, Urban Growth Area, Unincorporated King County, and probably others along with the geographical boundaries based on the physical attributes of the area. All of these can be divided up into smaller units from a variety of perspectives. From a physical perspective the natural boundaries of the plateau east of Renton appear to be roughly I-405 on the west, Sunset Blvd/SR900 on the north, Maple Valley Highway on the south, and Lake Kathleen on the east. ©2005 Carpenter & Associates 3 QOL0506 Rev: New 06/20/05 Quality of U fe 7 Definitions 7.1 Quality of Life In general, the definitions of Quality of Life (QOL) appear to focus on the more subjective attributes of a System. There is a rich discussion of this topic in the medical profession which focuses, of course, on the Human System. The measures of quality of life are viewed from the perspective of the overall wellbeing of the person and how certain things can affect that wellbeing. Without attempting to overuse the point, a neighborhood (whether few houses, a few blocks, a few miles, a city, a county, a state, a country, etc.) can be viewed as a System with attributes not unlike a Humane System, particularly considering the dominant participation humans have in the Neighborhood System. 7.2 Livability Other, more objective attributes of the Neighborhood System can generally be categorized under the heading of Livability. In this context, Livability contributes to Quality of Life 7.3 Neighborhood The definition of neighborhood can vary considerable from person to person or group to group so it's important to understand the context within which the word is used. Here, it is usually meant as: The area included in some physical boundary definition (e.g. this street, this block, this city, this boundary, etc) The boundaries of a neighborhood can be set based on more subjective affinity factors. For example, the neighborhood boundaries may be based on similarities in vegetation or housing type, or they might be based on external definitions like voting precinct or Growth Management land use designation. The focus here is on a neighborhood's quality of life and the ways that actions affect that quality of life. 8 Approach Inclusive: All positions are included Tools: Frameworks and Models (e.g., Influence, Accountability, Proposal, Support) 9 Readings 9.1 Randall O'Toole and the Thoreau Institute Randall O'Toole has a writing that does a very good job of providing the background and forwarding some analysis of their experience in a build -out area outside Portland, OR. He also authored a 2000 book on growth management whose principles are embodied 02005 Carpenter & Associates 4 QOL0506 Rev: New 06/20/05 Quality of Lffe and advocated by the Thoreau Institute, an advocacy group for which he is the senior economist. I've briefly corresponded with him and understand that the position he, and the Thoreau Institute, take is one of "seeking ways to protect the environment without regulations, bursary, or central control." They represent a position that is against the high degree of regulation approach to implementations of growth management and would prefer an incentive -based approach. They support letting market forces with appropriate incentives and penalties, influence the overall quality of life as growth management is played out. They also express an opinion regarding the effectiveness of "Smart Growth", the underlying theory behind Oregon's and Washington's Growth Management Acts. Their belief is that the number one negative outcome of Smart Growth is its impact on affordable housing. The Thoreau Institute web site Randall O'Toole's 2001 "The Follv of Smart Growth " Personal Note: I think that the objective should be one of striking a balance between regulation and incentive -based growth management. There may also be a concern as to whether it's "too late" for King County to adopt incentive -based implementation because of the politics of image. In other words, the County has been severely criticized regarding its planning and outcome success. There may not be enough time to step back to integrated incentive -based components to their growth management plan. There is a visual tour of Oak Grove. OR that does a great job of integrating digital photographs with text to explaining the situation that they faced and are continuing to face. 9.2 Washington Research Council This is about the most comprehensive writing I've found analyzing the outcome of Washington State's Growth Management Act. The series of papers written in 2000-2001, focused on the objectives and measurable outcomes of the GMA at its I0-year anniversary. The Board of Trustees and Board Members of the Washington Research Council is a whose -who of Northwest businesses and the council strives to be "the independent authority on taxes and efficient government." The WRC index to publications can be found here. The I I -part series on Growth in Perspective was written in 2000 and 2001, the archives of which can be linked to via this page. The entire 11-part series can be viewed here. Given the changes that have occurred in the area and the world since 2001, I've made a request of the WRC for an update based on more current information. 10 Growth Management The topic of Growth Management became popular during the 1980s principally because of the debate between growth and environment. Based on theories like New Urbanism and Smart Growth, States across the country began to develop comprehensive growth management plans. (D2005 Carpenter & Associates 5 QOL0506 Rev: New 06/20/05 t)uality ot'l.ife Washington State created the Growth Management Act (GMA) in 1990 with a significant revision in 1991. At the time, the Federal Government publicly recognized Washington State's Growth Management Act as one of the most comprehensive pieces of land management legislation yet produced. Based on the theory of Smart Growth, and with 13 goals, the GMA was intended to produce outcomes that struck a balance between growth and environment. Its implementation approach is characterized by significant reliance on regulations. It divides State land into sections based on intended land use and requires local governments to deal with the issue of balancing issues. As implementations of growth management legislation across the country reach their 10- year marks, there are expectations that major updates to the original plans will be produced. Part of that effort should be to review whether the legislation has produced the intended outcomes. The Washington Research Council produced an outcomes analysis of Washington State's GMA in 2000-2001. The degree to which the current land use characteristics of any region aligns to the intended land use characteristics for the GMA designation is directly related to the amount of change that the area will experience assuming that adequate attention and funding is available to factors deemed critical to the change. Some of the issues that have emerged from this change are issues of property rights, and the degree of authority current residents and area users have in the designation and/or change process. There are groups that are challenging the theories that underlie Growth Management. Smart Growth's reliance on regulations to manage the implementation has been challenged by those that argue that other forms of incentives will be at least as effective. Outcome measures reviews are also pointing to significant failures of Smart Growth to produce the intended results, particularly in the area of Affordable Housing. And local citizens, generally not involved in the process of Growth Management, are becoming more vocal about the impacts they are experiencing from its implementation. 11 Personal Information 11.1 Work experience Sharon and I recently finished 27-year careers at The Boeing Company, being hired within 6 months of each other in 1975. At Boeing, our careers included management positions from line supervision through executive levels and spanned a transformative period in Boeing's history, the outcome of which we see today as a very "different" company than the one we started with. During the period Boeing awoke from a culture of defects and shims with an attitude of having "a God-given right to 50% market share" and moved into a culture of quality, efficiency, and global competition. Being part of the culture ourselves AND in positions with leadership responsibilities we had to face head- on the challenges of causing a positive transformation in the company. Since leaving Boeing, we've started our own home -based business together. Under the trade names of Timeless Serenity and Carpenter & Associates, we enjoy the learning and experience of bringing high -quality alternative (soy -based) candles and candle (D2005 Carpenter & Associates 6 QOL0506 Rev: New 06/20/05 Quality of lffe accessories to customers, and providing consultation and facilitation to small businesses using the experience and expertise we gained in our working careers. Sharon, who had volunteered with the Humane Society for Seattle/King County for over 15 years, also took a part time job managing their outreach programs which provide animal -related assistance for low-income AIDS disabled and senior citizens. Tom and one of his business associates have collectively volunteered close to 2,000 hours since 2003 project managing and facilitation the Humane Society's disaster preparedness and business continuity program. Sharon and I are both degreed in Business Administration, one from Seattle University and the other from Seattle City College. I moved to Seattle in 1966 after graduating from high school in Iowa and, with the exception of three years as an officer in the U.S. Army, have lived in the Seattle area ever since. Sharon, on the other hand, is Renton -born and graduated from Renton High in 1970. Her parents and sister still live in the Renton area. 12 Contacts • Bonnie I. Walton Renton City Clerk • Renton City Council with special interest by Terri Briere (Chair in liaison to the King County Growth Management Council, Dan Clawson (Chair, Planning & Development Committee) • Four Creeks King County Unincorporated Area Council (initial contact in June, 2005; follow up planned for July, 2005) • CARE and Gwen High • East Renton Plateau Citizens Council • King County Growth Management Council (TBD via Terri Brier and David Irons) 13 Copyright This document and information may be shared freely as long as the copyright notice and version identification information is preserved. 14 Change history QOL0506 Rev: New • Initial release intended for use during the initial contacts with the Renton City Council and King County's Four Creeks Unincorporated Area Council (mid-2005) V2005 Carpenter & Associates 7 QOL0506 Rev: New 06/20/05 WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION PUBLIC HEARING COUNCIL CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE R-4 ZONING AND ANNEXATION EFFECTUATION June 20, 2005 The City has now received notice from the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County that they have approved the proposed 35.68-acre annexation (see map on back of handout). Renton is required to hold a second public hearing on future zoning for the subject site. If Council continues to support this annexation the Administration is asking that it also consider adopting an ordinance implementing the annexation itself as well as an ordinance for concurrent City zoning. The subject site is located within the City's East Renton Plateau Potential Annexation Area and is designated Residential Low Density (RID) on the City's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. This 35.68-acre site currently has King County's R-4 zoning on it and there are 23 dwelling units situated within it. The City's proposed R-4 zoning would allow up to 114 units and, unlike the County zoning which allows both attached and detached units, would all be detached single-family units. Tonight's public hearing will be the second of the two such required public hearings to consider future zoning. The Administration is asking the Council to consider future zoning that would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation of Residential Low Density. The recommended R-4 zone is consistent with this designation. If the Council concurs, the Administration is recommending that it hold the first reading of the annexation ordinance and the ordinance for future zoning. Recommendation: The Administration is recommending that if the Council wishes to bring the Wedgewood Lane Annexation into the City at this time that it rezone it R-4, consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designation, and that it hold the first reading tonight of the two ordinances it authorized staff to prepare when it last considered this annexation on March 14, 2005. Council Hearing Handout 06-20-05.doc\ El � t=77 C� ❑ i � - - -- -- - ❑ d F o 1 o + I � � 4 - ct3 B Qi 1� : ❑ T - --°l -+_ C D --r - — — --7--- ❑ -- -- — -- — - ° ❑ o -Cb U 00 UD —13] L - - - i - - - q 0 a — -- - e ❑ This doament is o grophk reDDruentatlon, not guaranteed to survey acaracy, Ilnntended Fr city ppurposes only and based on the but in/ormatlon avoitobla as of the data shown. This map Is for display purpuu oNy. Wedgewood Lane Annexation 0 400 800 Figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 4800 Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Existing Structure Alex Pietsch, Administrator — — Renton City Limits G. Del Rosario Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. L'NT� 24 September 2004 please see legal description for actual boundary. l� Proposed Annexation Area W dgeNwod Lane Annexation 2"d Public Haring on R-4 Pre/one A 0 innx'xation D) spo%itu}n a FXIStillp- Conditions P A A - M ithin Renton's Potential Annexation Area Location - East of 144th % t c St. if extended, and south of St 11T Street. Site abuts t rhan Growth Boundarx on its cast. • Size - + 35.68 acres • t ses Approximately 15 existing,mKle-family dwellings • Boundaries Abuts Renton on its west. Bounded on the north bx St 11411 St; if extended, and on the south bs approximateh SI- 111", it extended. Bounded on the cast, south of St I 1"" St, bx Honey ( reek and, north of St 11"" St, b) 148" are St.. Bac kgmUnd \oh�c„t Intent ern Dcscmbo h. 'uo4 • ( ouricif a�ccptcd Ott° 1'etation to knncx -n Mash 14. 'uir • ( rt� 1I0SIn'l 01c'r trot, I3„undary Rcs ie A Hoard ,ri xluy l'- liwI Fxi,ting Conditions - Vicinity Generally located between SE 11511 St it extended on north and SE 121 St if extended. on south Located between 144th Ave SE if extended on the west and Honey Creek South of SE 1?'th A ieinitx Flap MO m o pmowoo -- 3J0< -0 0) CD ID o � �T N N C7 d. 3 3 N. CT (D 3 G1 y m o �� j+Qm N 7 JOc o0) 7 N O DZj .N.. V J CD y 3 C 0 J fn N O CDO ID N y (D 3 ID 3 .J • rn 0In N � CY CD no o (A CD CrJ r— ID 0y M x CD m N i4 Cn lO C ID ti. 71 ID 7 O_ ^' d IDga 05 3 ID J 0 z '� 3 _ 9 Q ID Dl J O. r�• it �N...'.. . CD CD 3 (D CD rl� WOMM� G �./ in N U. C `3 7 c 3 y m '0r cI ~1 may/ Fi M C d 7 £ 4 Q d :, = s' ' C G 1i f 45 J l r I � 7 c_ - .. c v X S Q 15 C e, PuJUi c Hearirl9 Correspottq�«tc� 4 -go- aoos- �G!'IG�it Zfcna � 6, From: Bonnie Walton To: maren4@comcast.net Date: 6/20/2005 1:13:43 PM Subject: Re: Comments for Public Hearing/Wedgewood Lane Annex. and Zoning Requirement Dear Mr. Engbaum and Ms. Korsmo: Thank you for your email. Copy of this will be forwarded to all Council members and Mayor Keolker-Wheeler, and it will be entered into the record at tonight's public hearing. If I can provide further information or assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Bonnie I. Walton City Clerk City of Renton 425-430-6502 >>> <maren4@comcast. net> 6/20/2005 1:00:35 PM >>> To: Bonnie Walton City Clerk, Renton Washington From: Mark Engbaum and Renee Korsmo We will be unable to attend the Public Hearing tonight (6-20-05) regarding the Wedgewood Lane Annexation and Zoning Requirements, so we ask that this e-mail be added to the public comments. Could you please e-mail us back at maren4ecomcast.net to let us know that our comments have been recieved and will be read for the record at the Public Hearing tonight? Thank you Ms. Walton for your help. Renton City Council Members and Madam Mayor - We Mark Engbaum and Renee Korsmo own a home at 14522 S.E. 116th St. in Renton (presently unincorporated King County). We support the annexation of our property to the City of Renton. We also support net R-4 zoning for this area and want to go on record that we are opposed to anything higher than net R-4 zoning. Our single family home is on an acre and a quarter of land that borders the north boundary (east corner) of the Wedgewood Lane properties (specifically Wedgewood Lane III). Many of our neighbors have homes on three quarters of an acre or more in this rural area and so the net R-4 zoning would help preserve the rural feel of this area while allowing for growth within this urban growth zone. Thank you Council Members and Madam Mayor for considering our comments in your discussion of this issue. Sincerely, Mark Engbaum and Renee Korsmo Jq 6 �VV S C /I ( A St, gem 41-n qq o 6 q CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: June 20, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer SUBJECT: Administrative Report In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week: GENERAL INFORMATION • Renton's Enhanced Code Enforcement and Abatement Team (REACT) concept was selected over 21 other programs by the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) to receive the 2005 Municipal Achievement Award. These awards promote and recognize innovative and effective city government programs that significantly improve the quality of life in local communities. Mayor Keolker-Wheeler will receive the award on Wednesday, June 22°d, during a ceremony at AWC's annual conference in the Tri-Cities. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT • A community meeting to discuss the elements and layout of the future Heather Downs Park will be held on Tuesday, June 28 h, at 7:00 p.m. at the Highlands Community Center, 800 Edmonds Avenue NE. In addition, on Thursday, June 30"', an open house will be held at the future park site located on Union Avenue NE between NE 3rd Court and NE 2°d. People will be able to drop in and walk the site from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Representatives from the design consultant team, JA Brennan Associates, and the City of Renton Parks Division will be on -site to answer questions. For more details about either event, please call 425-430-6600. • On Tuesday, June 140', at the Renton Community Center, over 200 people celebrated the accomplishments of 104 athletes who participated in the Specialized Recreation track and field, soccer, and cycling programs. The Greater Renton Kiwanis cooked for the event, and Renton Youth Councilmembers were on hand to serve. • More than 400 people packed the Renton High School Stadium to watch the Youth Track and Field Meet with the City of Snoqualmie. This program continues to be a favorite of surrounding communities with 220 young people now registered for the Renton program. • The Indoor Volleyball League season came to a close last week with 41 spring teams participating over the last ten weeks. And, despite the rain, Summer Softball Adult Leagues have played over 545 games through June 17"'. The Fall Softball Leagues will start August 15L. • The After -School Program at Tiffany Park Elementary School concluded on June 17`s with a performance by the Tiffany Spirit Club, a group of over 60 children who have been meeting weekly to learn stomp and dance routines. • The Henry Moses Aquatic Center will be open daily for its second season beginning Wednesday, June 22°d, at noon, and ending September 50'. Public swim hours are 12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., seven days a week. New features include a slide for smaller children, a spray feature at the lazy river, a separate pass card gate for season pass holders, group rates, a second canopy for rent, non -slip surfaces in the locker rooms, improved signage, and pizza at the Shark Bite Cafe. For more information, call 425-430-6780. Administrative Report June 20, 2005 Page 2 • The City's swimming beaches will be open for the season from Saturday, June 25t', through Monday, September 5`s, from 12:00 noon through 8:00 p.m. Lifeguards will be on duty daily at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach, 1201 Lake Washington Boulevard North, and Kennydale Beach Park, 3600 Lake Washington Boulevard North. For more information, contact 425-430-6700 PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT We have learned that Puget Sound Energy will be cutting down all the large trees on their substation site south of 12'h (between Aberdeen and Edmonds). This activity will take place this coming fall. Phase One of the Sunset Sewer Interceptor project is complete and Houser Way Tunnel and Sunset Boulevard have now been opened. This roadway has been patched and is scheduled to be overlayed at the end of the project. Phase Two begins today, Monday, June 20"', including a local closure of Sunset Boulevard NE in the vicinity of the work zones, and will last until the contractor reaches NE Sunset Boulevard (new Sunset). The first portion of this phase will close the south and northbound lanes of Sunset Boulevard NE between Bronson Way South (at the entrance to Windsor Hills) and NE 7th Street during working hours only, and will be reopened to traffic each night and on weekends. Detour routes will be posted around the construction area but it is suggested that drivers try to avoid the work area. Conveniently rid your house, garage, and yard of unwanted junk during the one -day -only "Neighbor -to - Neighbor" Curbside Cleanup on Saturday, June 25 h. Items must be at the curb by 7:00 a.m. For more details about this event, call 425430-7397 or visit the City's website at www.ci.renton.wa.us. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL SUBMITTING DATA: Dept/DivBoard... City Clerk Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton SUBJECT: Bid opening on 6/14/2005 for CAG-05-078, S. 4th St. and Burnett Ave. S. Traffic Improvements Project EXHIBITS: Staff Recommendation Bid Tabulation Sheet (three bids) d A OF: June 20, AGENDA STATUS: Consent......... X Public Hearing.. Correspondence.. Ordinance....... Resolution...... Old Business.... New Business.... Study Session... Other........... RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Legal Dept...... Council concur Finance Dept.... Other. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... $178,085.30 Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted........ Revenue Generated... Total Project Budget ... $265,000.00 City Share Total Project... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Engineer's Estimate: $172,165.95 RECOMMENDED ACTION: In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Valley Electric Co. in the amount of $178,085.30. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM June 15, 2005 Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Ryan Plut, Project Manager X&IJO South 41h Street and Burnett Avenue South Traffic Improvements Proiect The work on the South 41h St. and Burnett Ave. South Traffic Improvements Project will include reconstruction of a traffic signal and pedestrian facilities at the intersection of South 41h Street & Burnett Avenue South in Renton, including but not limited to removal and installation of traffic signal appurtenances, installation of drainage structures, asphalt paving, signing, striping, sidewalk and curb ramp construction. This Traffic Improvement Project in the South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood is ranked number 12 in the 2005-2010 TIP. The funding for this project is budgeted from the 502 South Renton Reserve Fund. The lowest bid of $178,085.30 submitted by Valley Electric Co. fell within the project's total budget at $265,000 and over the engineer's estimate of $172,165.95, with a difference of $5,919.35. The Transportation Design Section would like to recommend that the contract be awarded to Valley Electric Co. Additionally, we also recommend that the Agenda Bill outlining this project go Council Concur since the low bid is within budget, there were three bids submitted, and the only irregularity in the low bid was an addition error of one dollar. Attachments: Ord. 5134 2005 Budget pg. 6-50 Bid Tabulation cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director Leslie Lahndt, Transportation Design Supervisor Ryan Plut, Transportation Design Project Manager File Amends ORD: 5110 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 513 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5110 RELATING TO THE CITY OF RENTON 2005 ANNUAL BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND BALANCE, INCREASING THE 2005 BUDGET, AND REALLOCATING THE EXPENDITURES IN SPECIFIC TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. WHEREAS, the City Council passed the 2005 Annual Budget Ordinance (Ordinance No. 5110) on December 20, 2004; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and advisable to amend the 2005 budget to accommodate new grants and other revenue and corresponding expenditures to complete transportation projects; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASIHNGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following adjustments are hereby allowed and established in fund listed below: Fund 2005 Budget Fund Balance, Jan. 1, 2005 $ 10,539,176 -Beginning Total New Revenue 6,145,200 Total Committed Expenditures (7,986,500 Budget Adjustments Per this Ordinance 2,382,300 Total Adjusted Budget $ 10,368,800 Ending Fund Balance; Dec. 31, 2005 $ 6,315,576 SECTION H. A list of all individual budget adjustments in the Transportation Capital Fund is hereby attached as Attachment A, and is available for public review in the office of the City Clerk, Renton City Hall. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 5134 SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effecti-ve upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 18th day of April 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 18 th day of Apri 1 , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, ity Attorney Date of Publication: 4/ 2 2/ 2 0 0 5 (summary) ORD: 1172:4/7/05:ma W — e4' - 4"-� , .1-� - Kathy K er-Wheeler, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. 5134 Transportation Capital Fund Attachment A Project Proposed TIP Project Title Number 2005 Budget Change 2005 Budget Comment Add'R-lonal funding needs + 2005 1 Street Overlay ram 317.012108 $ 405,000 $ 300,000 $ 705,000 budget. See ►rote 1. 2 ISR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 317.012138 10,000 5,000) 5,000 Reduced request $5,000 for 2005. Completes 30% design for entire project. Recent federal award of 3a Strander Bv/SW 27th St Connect 317.012239 800,000 10,000 810,000 $750,000. See Note 2. Complete final design for Ph. 1, 3b Strander Bv, Phase 1, Segment 1 ` 317.012239 210,000 210,000 Segment 1. See Note 2. TO and Metro mitigation funding. Construct Ph 1 in 2005. Prepare PSSE padmge for Ph 2 with possible additional design ($100k) due to 4 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 317.012175 10,000 1,107,800 1,117,800 Maintenance facility- See Note 3. 5 Renton Urban Shuttle RUSH 317.012163 5,000 - 5,000 Same as 2005 budget. 6 Transit Program 317.012109 20,400 - 20,400 Same as 2005 budget. $12,000 for additional work required to coordinate with Sound Transit and for 7 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ imprm 317.012193 20,000 63,100 83,100 additional project needs. Reduced $305,3W from 2005 budget; final report, public outreach, consultant 8 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 317.012176 315,300 305,300 10,000 for first project. $166,000 Metro mitigation funding for Highlands. Maplewood added. See 9 Walkway ram 317.000009 236,600 263,400 500,000 Note 4. New developer. Site plan being developed. Rough estimate to complete 10 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improy. 317.012306 - 1,100,000 1,100,000 100%design. See Note 5. 11 SR 169 Corridor Study 317.012401 50,000 - 50,000 same as 2005 budget. Construction was underfunded; new construction estimate; includes $60.000 12 South Renton Project 317.012194 18,200 246,8W 265,000 reserve; kwkdes raihoed cost. 13 1-4051m vements in Renton 317.012210 30,000 - 30,000 same as 2005 budget. 14 Project Develo en n 317.012150 175,000 - 175,000 Same as 2005 budget. Same as ZOOS budget. Potential need 15 NE 4th StfHogularn Av NE 317.012209 344,900 - 344,900 for increase at pry bid- 16 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th Pl 317.012308 585,000 265,000 320,000 Reduced request for 2005. - TO funding. Construction 2005. Project scope reduced to coordinate 17 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 317.012309 459,400 244,000) 215,400 with WSDOT nickel Project. 18 Arterial Circulation Program 317.000029 200,000 - 200,000 Saone as 2005 budget. Bridge inspections this year, load rate Wells Ave. Bridge, Prepare May Creek 19 Bridge Inspection & Repair 317.000106 40,000 6,300 46,300 BRAC application. For project completion. Funding 20 Loop Replacement Program 317.000016 20,000 12,000 32,000 needed for 2W4 bid stir pending. 21 Sign Replacement Program 317.012113 7,500 - 7,500 Same as 2005 budget. 22 Pole Program 317.000091 25,000 - 25,000 Same as 2005 budget. 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 317.012171 10,000 - 10,000 Same as 2005 budget. 24 Traffic Safety Program 317.012115 80,000 (40,000) 40,000 Reduced $40,000 in 2005. 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 317.012162 251,900 - 251,900 Some as 2005 budget. 26 JCBD Bike & Ped. Connections 317.012185 50,000 (200) 49,800 Finish upgrading all ramps. 27 Arterial Rehab. Prog. 317.012186 195,000 - 195,000 Average em-diture on program. 28 Duvall Ave NE 317.012123 1,258,700 408,700 850,000 Defer additional exists to 2006. Federal HFS grant of $396.000. Construction cost estimate kwr88se. Bids will determine actual construction 29 SunseVDuvaN Intersection 317.012301 381.000 437,700 818,700 fuming needs- 30 RR Crossing Safety Pr . 317.012166 5,000 - 5,000 Same as 2005 budget. 31 TDM ram 317.012135 64,200 - 64,200 same as 2005 budget - Sam as 2005 budget update LOS 32 Trans Concurrency 317.012107 40,000 - 40,000 program. ORDINANCE NO. 5134 Transportation Capital Fund Attachment A TIP Project Title Project Ntunber 2005 Budget Charge Proposed 2005 Budget Comment 33 Missing Links Program 317.012106 30,000 - 30,000 Same as 2005 budget. 34 GIS Needs Assessment 317.012206 35,000 15.000 20,000 Reduced $15,000 in 2005; do in-house, no consultant. 35 Grady Wy Corridor Study 317.012127 35,000 15,000) 20,000 Reduced $15,000 in 2005. 36 Sk Route Dev. Pr ram 317.012173 20,000 - 20,000 Same as 2006 budget. 37 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 317.012121 79,500 8,000 1,500 Defer $92,000 to 2006 or later, remaining construction delayed. 38 1 Signal Coord. 317.012140 12,000 ,000 6,000 Reduced request i7, 000 for ZOOS. 39 Environmental Monitoring 317.012187 85,000 - 85,000 Maintenance continues on both Phase 1 and 2. 40 Trans -Valle A Soos Creek Corr. 317.012191 5,000 3,000 2,000 Reduced $3,000 in 2005. 41 WSDOT Coordination Program 317.012146 10,000 5,000 15,000 Need input on needs for 2005. 42 1% for the Arts 317.012112 50,000 20,000 30,000 Reduced $20,000 in 2005. 43 Arterial HOV Program 317.012160 10,000 5,000 5,000 Reduced $5,000 in 2W5. Park -Sunset Corridor 317.012177 25,000 10,000 15,000 Reduced $10,000 to 2005; initiate in - house corridor study. 45 Lind AvSW 16th - SW 43rd 317.000024 5,000 - 5,000 Same as 2005 budget; Initiate in house corridor study. 46 Benson Rd S IS 31st St 317.012129 61,500 61,500 - King Co. lead; schedule unknown. See Note 6. 47 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 317.012303 - - - Programmed for 2W8. 48 Carr/Mill ilgrial 317.012304 5,000 3,000 2,000 Reduced $3,000 in 2005. 49 Transit Priority signal Systern 317.012174 30,000 22,600 7,400 Reduced $22.600 in 2005; lGng Co. expenditure no longer iricluded. 50 Transit Center Video 317.012208 10,000 - 10,000 Same as 2005 budget. 51 Houser ft S - Main to Burnett 317.012213 - - - Programmed for 2W8. 52 Trans Valley ITS 317.012211 5,000 45,000 50,000 Kwrg Co. lead; Ren ion's cortributio- from 2004 budget; P.O. in procew 53 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 317.012302 10,600 526,500 537,100 Go to ad and construct this year. Design is complete. 54 Monster Road Bridge 317.0123C 7 12;000 456,700 468,700 Construction will continue until May 2005. 55 SW 7th SUUnd Ave SW 317.012153 26,500 23,500 3,000 Reduced $23,5W. Completed. Federal and State audit passed. Need fonds for Project closeout and WSDOT bags. 56 Duvall Ave NE - King County 317.012305 1,311,300 (876,200) 435,100 Reductions: -$983,600 RigM4-way (King County will do directly); most construction costs deferred to 2006. Increased design costs. Strander Reserve _ Reserved for currently unknown capital Proje t- Total Sources i 7,996 500 $ 2,382,300 $ 10,368,800 ' ff funding received for St wxW, Ph. 1, Segment 1 cor6tnuction. $ 3,000,000 General fund or bonding $ 13,368,800 NOTES 1. The 20M overlay project requires additional funding due to Poorer c0rlddi0n of streets. 2. Total request for 3a and 3b is $1,020,000 (construction not included). 3. Phase 1. WIN adjust allocation based upon actual low bid when known. 4. Maplewood Glen sidewalk replacement added t0 2005 program. 5. Design contract for full design likely tD occur this year. Timing unknown. $1 million or more is estimated to complete design District 1. Bonding antic bed. 6. City has committed an upper limit of 200,000. Will return tD Council should project materialize in 2005. 7. The Dec. 31, 2005, fund balance is projected to be $6,315,576. fAgrtffiMbudget12005U0D5 Realtocation Summary Fund 502, Insurance Fund Fund 502, is an internal service fund which provides accounting for self- insurance services to all City departments for losses on property, liability, worker's compensation, unemployment compensation and a healthcare program. Expenses are paid by the Insurance Fund and rates are charged to departments based on use and/or coverage requirements. Effective January 1, 2004 a new Fund 512, Healthcare Insurance Fund was created to report all healthcare related items. Table 6-46. Fund 502, Insurance Fund 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 Change Item Actual Actual Adj Bdgt Actual Budget 04/05 REVENUE -- Interest Earnings 50,000 124,994 50,000 0.0% Liab/Prop Ins Premiums 1,840,800 1,840,800 1,932,400 5.0% Industrial Insurance Premiums 715,800 831,764 786,700 9.9% Unemployment Comp Premiums 114,700 114,700 114,700 0.0% Judgements/Settlements/Misc 0 136,497 0 N/A Other Financing Sources, Transfers in 940,000 940,000 0 -100.0% TOTAL NEW REVENUE 3,661,300 3,988,755 2,883,800 -21.2% Use of Prior Yr Revenue 162,500 0 665,500 309.5% TOTAL RESOURCES 3,823,800 3,988,755 3,549,300 -7.2% EXPENDITURES: Regular Salaries 104,800 106,521 109,100 4.1% Personnel Benefits 31,400 27,967 32,700 4.1% Other Benefits: Worker's Compensation 467,000 560,310 467,000 0.0% Unemployment Compensation 142,000 83,421 142,000 0.0% Professional Services: Industrial Ins Administrative Costs 250,000 273,983 250,000 0.0% Other Miscellaneous Services 42,000 2,500 42,000 0.0% Insurance: Property/Liability Claims 987,800 817,662 1,737,000 75.8% Premiums & Assessment Fees 634,300 619,863 703,200 lag% Travelrfraining 2,000 1,517 2,000 0.0% Miscellaneous: Memberships/Reg/Publications 2,500 410 2,500 0.0% Emergency Services 100 2,180 100 0.0% Transfer Out to Fund 512 1,100,000 1,100,000 0 -100.0% Interfund Payments 59,900 59,900 61,700 3.0•10 TOTAL COKMTTED EXPENDITURES 3,823,800 3,656,234 3,549,300 -7.2% Increase to Reserves 0 0 0 N/A TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,823,800 3,656,234 3,549,300 -7.2% Fund Balance, January 1 7,611,589 7,611,589 7,944,110 4.4% Total New Revenue 3,661,300 3,988,755 2,883,800 -21.2% Total Committed Expenditures (3,823,800) (3,656,234) (3,549,300) -7.2•0 Fund Balance Plus Reserves 7,449,089 7,944,110 7,278,610 -2.3% Anti Recessionary 2,100,000 2,100,000 2,100,000 ao% South Renton Reserve 660,000 660,000 660,000 0.0% Reserve for Claims 750,000 750,000 0 -100.0% Operating Reserves of GG Funds 5,420,448 5,116,291 4,518,610 -16.6% Fund Balance, Dec 31 (1,754,359) (682,181) 0 -100.0% Budget by Fund 6-50 Project Title: S. 4th Street & Burnett Avenue S. Traffic Improvements BID DATE: June 14, 2005 Item City of Renton Engineers Estimate Unit Est. I Unit Bid Quantity Price Amount _ 4 _ Remove Cement Concrete Sidewalk, Including Haul SY 126 _ 5 Remove Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter, Including Haul LF 274 _ 6 - _ Roadway Excavation Including Haul __ LS 1 _ 7 Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 350 8 Cement Concrete Sidewalk SY_ 281 9 Asphalt Concrete Sidewalk Ton - 2 10 Cement Concrete Curb Ramp EA 8 11 Asphalt -Treated Base Ton _ 14 12 Asphalt Concrete Pavement Class B _ Ton 11_ 13 Catch Basin Type 1 EA 1_ _ 14 Catch Basin Type 2, 48" _ LS 1 _ 15 Reconnection of Existing Pipes to New Drainage Structure LS _ 1 _ 16 Storm Sewer Pipe 8"D.I. CL 52 LF 35_ _17 _Traffic Signal and Illumination System - Complete LS _ _ 1 18 _ Permanent Signing _ EA _ 4 19 _ Remove Existing Traffic Markings LS 1 ^_ 20 Plastic Crosswalk Stripe _ SF 230 21 _ Plastic Stop Bar LF _ _ 62__ 22 Plastic Arrow EA _ 3 23 4" Wide, White Paint, Edge Line LF 150 24 Raised Pavement Markers LF 645 SCHPRICE XLS, 6.dTab 3.50 _2,205.06 8.00 2,176.00 10.00 1.260.00 5,000.00 12.0_0 5,000.00 4,200.00 _ 65.00_ _ 120.00 _ _ 18,265.00 240.00 400.00 __ 12_0.00 3,200.00 1,6_8090_ 120.00 1,200.00� _1,320.00_ 1,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 900.00 900.00 30.00 95,132.50 300.00 1,050.00 95,132.50 1,200.00_ 5,000.00 5.000.00 �10,00 2,300.00 8.00 496.00 _ 50.00 _ 150.00 2.50 375.00 TOTAL: 172,165.95 Valley Electric Unit Bid Price Amount 9,000.00 9,000.00 11.75 7,402.50 43.40 11,804.80 42.00 5,292.00 16.00 4,02.00 4,384.00 , ,,-M 00 33.00 11,550.00 _ 51.00 14,331.00 312.00 624.00 _ 1,650.00 13,200.00 312.00 4,368.00 312,00 3,4_32.00 _ 2,490.00 2,490.00 5,174.00 5,174.00 1,034.00 1,034.00 93.00 3.255.00 68,900.00 68,900.00 475.00 1,900.00 1,366.00 1,366.00 3.60 828.00 4.50 279.06 85.00 255.00 1.20 180.00 3.20 2,064.00 (One dollar higher than bid document) Dennis R. Craig Transtech Electric, Construction, Inc. Inc. Unit Bid Unit Bid Price Amount Price Amount 18,600,00 18,600.00 17,900.00 17, 900.00 2.10 1,323.00 5.25 3.307.50 33.40 9,084.80 38.45 10.458.40 32.25 4,063.50 37.10 4,674.60 12.25 3,356.50 14.10 3,86340 6,070.00 6,070.00 10,895.00 10,895.00 25.20 8,820.00 29.00 10,150.00 39.75 11,169.75 45.70 12,841.70 500.00 1,000.00 225.00 450.00 1,275.00 10,200.00 1,465.00 11.720. C C 195.00 2,730.00 225.00 3,150 CO 350.00 3,850.00 225.00 2,475.00 1,913.00 _ 1,913.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 3,975.00 3,975.00 4,570.00 4,570.00 795.00 _795.00 2,915.00 2,915.00 71.50_ 2,502.50 82.25_ 2,878.75 87,276.80 87,276.80 72,490.25 72,490.25 _ 280.00_ 1,120.00 325.00 1,300.00 1,176.00 1,176.00 2,210.00 2,210.00 3.10 713.00 3.15 724.50 3.90 __ 241,80 4.05 251.10 - 72.80 218.40 -- 74.75 - -224.25 --------------- -- -- 1.10 165.00 1.15 172.50 2.80 1,806.00 2.90 1,870.50 182.170.05 183, 692 ,45 CITY OF RENTON BID TABULATION SHEET PROJECT: S. 4th St. and Burnett Ave. S. Traffic Improvements; CAG-05-078 DATE: June 14, 2005 FORMS BID BIDDER Bid Triple Bond Form Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc. X X $182,170.05 PO Box 595 Redmond, WA 98073-0595 Janie Craig Transtech Electric, Inc. X X $183,692.45 PO Box 7429 Kent, WA 98042 Mary T. Guthmiller $178,085.30 Valley Electric X X $178,094.30 1100 Merrill Creek Parkway Everett, WA 98203 Vicki Myers ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $172,165.95 *corrected LEGEND: Forms: Triple Form: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti -Trust Claims, Minimum Wage CI T Y O F RENTON CO I INCI L fI GEND,A B IL L SUBMITTING DATA: Debt/Div/Board. 11uman Resources & Risk Management Staff Contact....... Michael Webby (x - 7650) FOR A GE,VDA OF: June 20, 200 1 AGENDA STATUS: Consent ................. X SUBJEC"I': Public I tearing..... Reorg, Cmty. Svcs. Housing Repair Division, Salary Adjustment for Dousing Repair Positions effect. June 2005; Police Manager; P/PW Dept. Utility Eng effect. January 2005 FXHIBI'TS: Issue Paper & Executive Summaries for January 2005 and June 2005, Fiscal Costs, and Job Classifications for. Utilities/GIS Engineer, I lousing Repair Coordinator, I lousing Repair Technician Correspondence... Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Session....... Other ..................... REAOMEMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS: Refer to Finance Committee Legal Dept-.-X Finance Dept. X Otherr..................... FISC�11. IiIIPAC'T: Expenditure Required ..... $ 14,801. Translcr/Amendment.... Amount Budgeted ........... $ 14,861. Revenue Generated....... SUI\ MARY OF :ACTION: Salary Adjustment and "Title Change of the following classifications. Current Title Current New Grade Budget Change thru Grade 2005 _ Police Manager m34 m38 $4,392 Civil Engineer Ill (New Title- Utilit /GIS Engineer) a27 a31 $7,452 The above changes, if approved, will be effective January 1, 2005. These reclassifications will not require additional budget appropriations. Current Title Current New Budget Change thru Grade Grade 2005 Housing Assistance Specialist (New Title —Housing a18 a20 $1,708 _Repair Coordinator) I ousing Maintenance Worker — (New Title housing a07 a08 $1,309 Repair Technician) The above changes, if approved, will be effective June 1, 2005. These reclassifications will not rcqmre additional budget appropriations. STAFF RF.COi\I1IENDATI0N: Approve the I lousing Repair Division of the Cornrnunity Services Department reorganisation, title changes, and salary adjustments, the Police Department salary adjustment, and the I'lanning/Building/Puhlic Works Department title change and salary adjustment. Funds to implemetit this recommendation are contained within the respective departmental budgets, which will cover the additional costs of these reclassifications in 2005. 64,11, O�HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK _- MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 4 \�,.Trco� M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 10, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President r , Members of the Renton City Council VIA: *ebby, eolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: HR & RM Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Eileen Flott SUBJECT: Reorganization and Salary Adjustments The purpose of this document is to provide an executive summary of the review process of certain positions. If approved, the recommended salary adjustments contained in this report would be retroactive to January 1, 2005 except for two (2) classifications, which would be retroactive to June 1, 2005. The salary analysis affects positions in the Community Services, Planning/Building/Public Works, and Police Departments. We processed four (4) reviews during this period and are recommending four (4) for salary adjustments for 2005. The result of this review process, if approved, will provide salary adjustments to four (4) employees. Salary adjustments are based upon the labor market and internal equity. The cost of implementation during FY 2005 is approximately $14,861, excluding salary related benefits. Recommendation by Department PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS Civil Engineer III (Local 2170, P-rade a27,) Utilities Division (JD Wilson): Over the past five years this position has added additional duties of creating and maintaining hydraulic models and GIS databases. These additional duties had been contracted out previously costing the utility approximately $20,000 - $30,000 a year. With these changes it is recommended the current Civil Engineer III position, salary range a27, occupied by J. D. Wilson be converted to Utility/GIS Engineer salary range a31, effective January 1, 2005. is\files\reclass\council\issue paper re_org 2005.doc Michael Webby Page 2 of 2 June 10, 2005 POLICE Police Manager (Non -Represented, grade m34) Penny Bartley: The duties performed by the Police Manager have continued to increase. Recently she assumed responsibility for managing a very complex interlocal agreement among 37 public agencies relating to the collection, holding and transportation of detainees. In order to maintain equity within the division managers and to compensate Ms. Bartley for her level of responsibility staff recommends a salary adjustment to grade m38, effective January 1, 2005. COMMUNITY SERVICES Housing Assistance Specialist (Local 2170, grade al 8): The reorganization of duties of this position will allow this position more time to manage the contracts and develop a small job roster. This position will be more of a contract manager, then a journey -level maintenance worker. Our recommendation to change this position is based upon labor market analysis as well as internal equity. We recommend the position be increased to grade a20 and the title changed to Housing Repair Coordinator effective June 1, 2005. Housing Maintenance Worker (Local 2170, grade a07): The reorganization of duties of this position will allow this position more time to provide information/education to homeowners to prevent future health and/or safety hazards from occurring. Our recommendation to change this position is based upon labor market analysis as well as internal equity. We recommend the position be increased to grade a08 and the title changed to Housing Repair Technician effective June 1, 2005. i:\files\recIass\council\issue paper re_org 2005.doc JANUARY 2005 GRAND TOTAL COSTS DEPARTMENT TOTALS 2005 TOTALS COMMUNITY SERVICES $ 3,017.00 PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS $ 7,452.00 POLICE $ 4,392.00 TOTALS $ 14,861.00 RCLCOST_January04.xls GR_TOTALS Page 4 6/7/2005 June 2005 RE -ORGANIZATION COSTS EMPLOYEE CURRENT POSITION Jan -Dec 05 June -Dec 05 COST NOTES NEW POSITION & GRADE Before Re -class After Re -Class Vacant Housing Assistant Specialist $ 57,444.00 $ 59,152.00 $ 1,708.00 grade a20 step E Housing Repair Coordinator Lynn Rothlisberger Housing Maintenance Worker $ 43,764.00 $ 45,073.00 $ 1,309.00 grade a8 step E Housing Repair Technician TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES $ 101,208.00 $ 104,225.00 $ 3,017.00 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES $ 101,208.00 $ 104,225.00 $ 3,017.00 Reorcg_January05.xls cnry_svcs Page 1 6114/2005 JANUARY 2005 RE -ORGANIZATION COSTS EMPLOYEE CURRENT POSITION Jan -Dec 05 ,Jan -Dec 05 2004 COST_ NEW POSITION & GRADE Before Re -class lAfter Re -Class John Wilson Civil Engineer III $ 71,760.00 $ 79,212.00 $ 7,452.00 UtilitylGIS Engineer grade a31 UTILITIES GRAND TOTAL $ 71,760.00 $ 79,212.00 $ 7,452.00 LLI.1=5200 PLANIBLDGIPBLC WORKS GRAND TOTAL 71 760.00 $ 79,212.00 RCLC0ST_January04.x1s pbpw Page 2 61712005 JANUARY 2005 SALARY ADJUSTMENT COSTS EMPLOYEE CURRENT POSITION Jan -Jun 05 Jan -Dec 05 !COST NOTES Before Re -class !After Re -Class Penny_Bartley .Police Manager 86472' 90864fi 43921Step D grade m38 Support Services Total_�$- - 86,472 $ - 90,864 1$ 4,392 -- - POLICE GRAND TOTAL $ 86,472 $ 90,864 $ 4,392 RCLC' muary04.As Police 3 1 6/7/2005 ,, CITY OF RENTON Human Resources & Risk Management Kathy KeolkerWheeler, Mayor Michael R. Webby, Administrator DATE: May 9, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the City Council VIA: K by Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: ebby, HR & RM Administrator SUBJECT: New Position and Salary Recommendation BACKGROUND: Mr. J.D. Wilson is a Civil Engineer III. He creates and maintains hydraulic models of the City's water system; he also creates and maintains a GIS database of the water system. The GIS database work traditionally had been contracted out costing the utility approximately $20,000 - $30,000 a year. He has performed these additional duties and responsibilities for the last five years. To further describe the benefits of Mr. Wilson's GIS work I have attached an issue paper from Gregg Zimmerman, Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator ISSUE: Gregg Zimmerman met with Eileen Flott and me and discussed his concerns related to Mr. Wilson's responsibilities, value to his Department and the City, as well as his concern about J.D.'s level of compensation. He explained his interest in addressing pay equity for Mr. Wilson's "unique" collection of duties and responsibilities. Gregg requests Mr. Wilson's salary range is adjusted to recognize the added GIS work he performs. CONCLUSION: With this in mind, I recommend the City create a new position of Utility/GIS Engineer to replace the existing Civil Engineer III position occupied by Mr. Wilson. I also recommend the new position be classified at range a31, effective January 1, 2005. 1055 South Grady Way -- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-7650 MThis—,—tai— 5n^4 .s.r 4-1 material 3()% rx t r RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 24, 2005 TO: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer CC: Mike Webby, HR & Risk Management Administrator FROM: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator (ext. 7311�A STAFF CONTACT: SUBJECT: ISSUE: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director (ext. 7239) Request for a New Position and Title for J.D. Wilson from Civil Engineer III to Utility & GIS Engineer Request to form a new position for J.D. Wilson from Civil Engineer III, grade 27 to a new position titled Utility and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Engineer, grade 31. RECOMMENDATION: Create a new position titled "Utility and GIS Engineer", grade 31, to replace a Civil Engineer III position in the Water Utility section. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: For the past five years, J.D. has voluntarily taken on a significantly greater role than his current position, as a Civil Engineer III requires. The most significant changes in J.D.'s duties include the following: • Creation and Maintenance of the Hydraulic Model of the City's Water System J.D. applied his expertise and high level of competency in advanced computer and engineering technologies in the creation, development, operation and maintenance of the hydraulic computer model of the City's water system. This knowledge of advanced computer and engineering technologies, software applications and technical skills is not required under J.D.'s current position. The City and other public and private agencies use the hydraulic model to determine the available fire flow and water pressure for the purpose of Covington/CE III/GIS Recommendation February 24, 2005 Page 3 of 3 Knowledge of and ability to use Visual Basic (VB), Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), ArcObjects, and other component object model (COM) objects to create data retrieval, report, and map applications. • Comparison With Other Jobs in the City For comparison, some of J.D.'s duties overlap with several City job descriptions at higher grades, such as Program Development Coordinator I1(grade 29), Mapping Coordinator (grade 29) and Application Support Supervisor (grade 30). Duties that J.D. performs that are covered under these other positions include updating and maintaining maps using CAD and GIS; providing hardware and software support to staff, and supporting the City's GIS development, implementation and maintenance. In addition, J.D. performs many other duties at an advanced technical level that are not included in any current City job description and have historically been completed by hiring outside consultants, such as hydraulic modeling and database management. J.D. also possesses the higher education and experience levels cited for these higher -grade positions. CONCLUSION: J.D. performs a wide variety of duties at an advanced technical level that are well outside the Civil Engineer III classification. These additional tasks have resulted in substantial one-time savings estimated at over $300,000 and continue to provide an estimated annual savings of over $142,000 to the City. Moreover, by performing these duties in-house, the City saves time and money, and is better able to respond to customer requests. To properly compensate J.D. for performing these additional duties, we recommend the creation of a new position title of "Utility and GIS Engineer" at a grade 31. cc: Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Engineering Supervisor Eileen Flott, HR Manager City of Renton Received MAR 0 3 2005 Human Resources & Risk Management HA\File Sys\USA - Utility Systems Division Administration\USA-04 - Personncl\USA-04 - 0006 Correspondence - Personnel\reclass-issue- J.D.doc\AGtp CITY OF RENTON CLASS TITLE: C4VI-L-UTII,ITY/GIS ENGINEER4H (EN-24752425 BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of an assigned supervisor, plan and conduct complex and large scale engineering studies and projects; develop and maintain Geographic Inforination Systems (GIS) g�eodatabases for the City's utilities, create complex hydraulic models, coordinate and direct outside engineering consultants and firms on assigned projects and studies. r aM09.1" HamrQ•e REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: *Create and maintain hvdraulic models for Citv's utilities. Perform hvdraulic, quality and energy -use analyses of the systems. Gather information from diverse sources to create and maintain complex hydraulic models for the Citv utilities. Interpret the results of model analyses by applying professional engineering judgment, knowledge, and understanding of the capabilities and limitation of the hvdraulic models. *Interprets results of hvdraulic analyses, develops and recommends capital improvements to the City's utilities to improve short-term and long-term demands of City's utilities. *Provides necessary information reearding the availability of water flow and pressures for the purposes of fighting fires and specified locations in the water distribution system. Advises the Water Maintenance Section on options to address water quality problems in the system and recommends locations for water quality monitoring stations. *Create, maintain, and document schema for databases and geographic information systems (GIS geodatabases) for piped utilities. Coordinates with other sections, divisions and departments within the City to ensure schema Civil Engineer III - Continued Page 2 developed for both piped utilities and used by piped utilities are compatible with enterprise wide information needs. * Tests new software applications and provides data retrieval and reports for use by various City departments. *Plan and conduct large-scale engineering studies utilizing staff from within the City or outside consultants as necessary; develop timelines, specifications and project objectives; monitor progress and provide periodic reports regarding assigned projects. *Develop specifications and cost estimates for bids on major projects requiring outside consulting assistance; participate in the selection of consultants; negotiate and monitor contracts and services of outside firms to assure compliance with specifications, timelines and City ordinances and policies; approve payments to contractors on major projects as appropriate and submit to superiors for final authorization. *Provide work direction and guidance to other engineering personnel on City projects as requested; provide project leadership as assigned on projects requiring City personnel; establish and maintain project schedules and activities. *Provide written and verbal reports as necessary on assigned projects and contracts; present reports to outside groups, City Council, commissions or others as requested; maintain records for assigned activities. *Meet with City personnel as necessary on capital construction, transportation, utility projects and studies to assure needs are being met by proposed designs and specifications; assure proper communication at key intervals between consultants, contractors, department heads and others. *Review complex architectural and engineering plans and drawings for major construction projects within the City to assure compliance with City ordinances and policies; approve plans or indicate deficiencies with corrective action guidelines. *Make complex calculations involving assigned engineering specialty including utilities, construction, transportation and others; review calculations and designs of others to assure conformance with City engineering standards. *Prepare and review drawings and design as necessary for major projects to lead or assist in the overall design effort. Civil Engineer Ill - Continued Page 3 *Prepare engineering drawings in support of technical models for permit — review, in-house projects and project management. *Provide for and lead plan reviews for outside contractors on major projects and studies to assure compliance of building and other construction with City codes, ordinances and policies; inspect sites as necessary. Perform related duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Advanced principles, practices, methods and techniques of civil engineering. • Various modeling software (i.e. MWH Soft H2Onet and InfoWater hydraulic modeling software). • Using manipulating and formatting complex queries. • Designing relational databases system schemas and implementingi with various software. • Connecting to various compliant databases (i.e. Open Database Connectivity ODBC . • Computer aided software engineering (CASE) tools such as MS Visio Professional, Rational Rose and Unified Modeling Language (UML). • Creating maintaining and documenting schema for databases and geodatabases. • Using various programs (ESRI ArcGIS (Arclnfo, Arc Catalog, Arc Map, Arc Tools, etc) to create maintain and document geodatabases and map applications. • Using various programs to create data retrieval reportand map applications (i.e. Visual Basic (VB) Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), Arc Objects, and Component Object Model (COM). • Technical specialty within engineering discipline appropriate to assignment. • Modern engineering methods as applied to the design, project management and construction of public works, public utilities, transportation and general construction. • Applicable laws, codes, regulations, policies and procedures. • SEPA and/or NEPA environmental review requirements associated with field of specialty. • Oral and written communication skills. • Correct English usage, grammar and vocabulary. • Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. • Principles of work direction and guidance of other technical personnel on project teams. ABILITY TO: 0 Perform difficult and complex engineering mathematical computations. Civil Engineer III - Continued Page 4 • Use various modeling software (i.e. MWH Soft H2Onet and InfoWater hydraulic modeling, software). • Use manipulate and format complex queries. • Design relational databases system schemas and implement with various software. • Connect to various compliant databases (i.e. Open Database Connectivity (ODBC). • Use computer aided software engineeringL(CASE) tools such as MS Visio Professional Rational Rose and Unified Modeling Language (UML). • Create maintain and document schema for databases and geodatabases. • Use various programs (ESRI ArcGiS (ArcInfo Arc Catalog, Are Map, Arc Tools, etc) for creating maintaining and documenting geodatabases and map applications. • Use various programs for creating data retrieval reporting and map 4pplications (i.e. Visual Basic (VB) Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), Arc Objects, and Component Object Model (COM). • Design and evaluate engineering projects to assure objectives and codes are followed. • Compile and analyze statistical and technical information, maps, research data and other pertinent data. • Prepare and obtain state and federal permits required for Capital Improvement Program projects associated with field of specialty. • Understand and follow oral and written directions. • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. • Make verbal presentations and lead technical meetings. • Meet schedules, commitments and time lines. • Plan, organize and lead complex projects involving other technical personnel. • Interpret, apply and explain codes, rules, regulations, policies and procedures. • Maintain records and prepare comprehensive reports. • Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with others. • Observe legal and defensive driving practices. EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination equivalent to: bachelor's degree in Civil Engineering or related field and four years increasingly responsible engineering experience. LICENSES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS: Some positions in this classification may require a Professional Engineer license. Valid Washington State driver's license. WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is performed in office and field environments. *Denotes an essential function Civil Engineer llI - Continued Page 5 Effective Date: January 2005 September- 1993 ..Il Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor DATE: May 9, 2005 CITY 'OF RENTON Human Resources & Risk Management Michael R. Webby, Administrator TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: 4kebby, HR & RM Administrator SUBJECT: Human Services Division Reorganization Recommendation BACKGROUND: The Human Services Division has two full-time positions in the Housing Repair Assistance Program, which are funded by Community Development Block Grant funds, and is contemplating a modification to the scope of work, job duties and responsibilities of the two positions. The Human Services Divisions proposes the changes in order to make the repair program more cost effective: For more information on the changes I have attached a copy of a memo from Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator explaining the department's rationale for the reorganization and job modifications. ISSUE: Dennis Culp and Karen Bergsvik�met with Eileen Flott and me and discussed their concerns related to Housing Repair Assistance program reorganization. The changes in duties of both positions will require new job classifications and possibly title changes. The Human Resources Department surveyed other municipalities for salary comparisons and found a few matches for both positions. The survey data shows the current base wage of the proposed Housing Assistant Specialist position and the Housing Maintenance Worker position to be below our, 60t' percentile target. Both of these positions are within the AFSCME, Local 2170 bargaining unit. CONCLUSION: With this in mind, it is our recommendation the Housing Assistant Specialist's salary be adjusted to a20 from a18, which is approximately five percent, and the title changed to Housing Repair Coordinator. The Housing Maintenance Worker's salary be adjusted to a08 from a07, and the title changed to Housing Repair Technician. With your approval we recommend the effective date of these salary adjustments to be June 1, 2005. 1055 South Grady Way -- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-7650 MThknano,—tai-50 rpfv k lmaterial 30% oust consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE •/r MEMORANDUM AVON .4AN CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY SERVICES 0 Committed to Enriching Lives 0 DATE: February 18, 2005 TO: Mike Webby, HR/RM Administrator „Eileen Flott, HR Manager FROM: Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator _X� St vg4,'tQ SUBJECT: Human Services Division Staff Assignments The Human Services Division is contemplating a modification to the scope of work, job duties and responsibilities of two positions in the Housing Repair Assistance Program. Two full-time positions are funded by Community Development Block Grant capital funds. The Housing Maintenance Worker presently performs a variety of skilled work related to home maintenance and minor repair for qualifying low-income Renton residents. The Housing Assistance Specialist position performs a wide variety of duties including assuming responsibility for the projects and operations of the program, assisting the Housing Maintenance Worker as needed, and supervising and evaluating assigned personnel to ensure repairs are made in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, policies and procedures. We propose the following change in order to make the repair program more cost effective: The Housing Assistance Specialist will establish a small job roster for contracted jobs. Currently, we solicit three bids from contractors. This is very time consuming for the current staff and we do not have relationships with many of the vendors so there is not a price reduction. The roster will not only give the vendors an opportunity to bid the work at a reasonable price but will enable us to establish a working relationship. Policies adopted in 2003 shifted the focus from a variety of repairs to only providing repairs relating to the health and safety of the residents. The majority of the repairs are in the areas of plumbing, heating, accommodations for disabilities, and roofing. While the workers are able to do the simple repairs, they may not have the necessary skills to do more complex work. If that is the case, repairs will then be contracted. MEMORANDUM Fs ,.0 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY SERVICES 0 Committed to Enriching Lives 0 DATE: February 18, 2005 TO: Mike Webby, HR/RM Administrator „Eileen Flott, HR Manager FROM: Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator SUBJECT: Human Services Division Staff Assignments The Human Services Division is contemplating a modification to the scope of work, job duties and responsibilities of two positions in the Housing Repair Assistance Program. Two full-time positions are funded by Community Development Block Grant capital funds. The Housing Maintenance Worker presently performs a variety of skilled work related to home maintenance and minor repair for qualifying low-income Renton residents. The Housing Assistance Specialist position performs a wide variety of duties including assuming responsibility for the projects and operations of the program, assisting the Housing Maintenance Worker as needed, and supervising and evaluating assigned personnel to ensure repairs are made in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, policies and procedures. We propose the following change in order to make the repair program more cost effective: The Housing Assistance Specialist will establish a small job roster for contracted jobs. Currently, we solicit three bids from contractors. This is very time consuming for the current staff and we do not have relationships with many of the vendors so there is not a price reduction. The roster will not only give the vendors an opportunity to bid the work at a reasonable price but will enable us to establish a working relationship. Policies adopted in 2003 shifted the focus from a variety of repairs to only providing repairs relating to the health and safety of the residents. The majority of the repairs are in the areas of plumbing, heating, accommodations for disabilities, and roofing. While the workers are able to do the simple repairs, they may not have the necessary skills to do more complex work. If that is the case, repairs will then be contracted. Redefining the Housing Assistance Specialist position will allow this position more time to manage the contracts and develop a small job roster. The position will be more of a contract manager, than a person who performs journey -level repairs and assists the Housing Maintenance Worker. The Housing Maintenance Worker position will continue to do the simple repairs. Additionally, this employee will provide information/education to homeowners to prevent future health and/or safety hazards from occurring. This may be done on either an individual or group basis. Copies of the proposed job descriptions are attached for you review. If you concur in these changes, please finalize the draft job descriptions, evaluate them to assign an appropriate job title and pay grade, and post the vacancy for the recruitment of the Housing Assistance Specialist. Attachments as stated Cc: Karen Bergsvik, Human Services Manager January 2005 Survey Detail with 2005 wages Housing Assistant GRADE Specialist a18 DEPT_ Cnnty Services Perform a wide variety of duties in planning and administering the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program (HRAP). Responsible for ensuring repairs are made in conformance with applicable laws, regulations, policies, and proceudres. Assessing homes for the safety and health hazards that need repair; developing specifications, requesting bids, and preparing RFQs for work to be performed maintaining a small job roster; inspecting completed work to ensure compliance with specifications and applicable laws, codes and regulations; coordination with volunteer groups; evaluation of the program — ensuring excellent customer service; record -keeping and reporting; understanding correct application of CDBG and contract requirements; develop budget, may perform minor home repairs CITIES ---� Population TOP OF ' Adj -T- -- Notes - - ----- - -- _ _ SALARY RANGE 1 Range _ Auburn 45,355 n/m Bainbridge Island 21,350 _ Bothell Burien 30,910 31,480 n/m Des Moines 29,120 n/m Edmonds 39,580 _ Everett 95,470 5280 5280 Housing Improvement Inspector _ Federal Way 83,500 n/m Issaquah 15,110 n/m _. Kent 84,210 5026 5026 Human Services Coordinator Kirkland 45,630 n/m Lakewood 58,940 4397 4397 Housing Repair Coordinator Lynnwood 34,500 Mercer Island 21,840 n/m Mountlake Terrace 1 20,380 Olympia ! 42,860 Puyallup i 35,490 n/m Redmond 46,480 n/m SeaTac 25,100 Shoreline 52,730 n/m Snohomish 8,640 Tacoma 196,300 5105 5105 Housing Rehab Coordinator Tukwila 17,230 n/m University Place 30,720 n/m _ Renton—� 54,900 $-------- 4,787 ' $ 4,787 -5.9% - --- __— --_ — Median $ 5,065 $ 5,065. 60th Percentile I T $ 5,089 $ 5,089 2005 Jan_Reclass.xis Detail (2005) Page 1 3/21/2005 January 2005 Survey Detail with 2005 wages Housing Maint GRADE DEPT Worker a07 Cmty Services perform a variety of work related to home maintenance and repair for the HRAP. This includes minor repairs related to the health and safety of low and moderate income homeowners, assessing homes for needed repairs and teaching preventative maintenance and demonstrating how to do minor home repairs for Renton residents. Mus comply with all applicable federal regulations, and requirements. CITIES Population TOP OF Adj Notes SALARY RANGE Range Auburn 45 355 m Bainbridge Island 21,350 Bothell 30,910 n/m Burien 31,480 Des Moines 29,120 n/m Edmonds 39,580 Everett 95,470 _- - 4954 Housing Improvement Advisor (NO MATCH) Federal Way _ 83,500 n/m Issaquah 15,110 n/m Kent 84,210 4047 3642 Maintenance Worker III (Does more complex repairs, more lead responsibilities decrease 10%) Kirkland 45,630 n/m Lakewood 58,940 n/m Lynnwood 34,500 — Mercer Island 21,840 n/m Mountlake Terrace 20,380 Olympia 42,860 Puyallup _ 35,490 n/m Redmond 46,480 n/m SeaTac 25,100 Shoreline 52,730 n/m Snohomish 8,640 Tacoma 196,300 4604 Housing Rehab Specialist (NO MATCH)___ _ Tukwila _ 17,230 n/m �.---- ---- --- -- — — - - University Place _ 30,720 -- n/m Renton 54,900 $ 3,647 ! $ 3,647 0.1 Median _ $ 4,604 $ 3,642 60th Percentile -� $ 4,674 $ 3,642 - 2005 Jan Reclass.xls Detail (2005) Page 1 5/3/2005 CITY OF RENTON CLASS TITLE: HOUSING ASSISTANCE SPECIALIST (AS-2487) BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of the Human eo.-,,iees nn,,.,,,gemn assigned supervisor, —,perform a wide variety of duties in planning and administering the City's Housing Repair Assistance Program (HRAP).This program servesllousiH Repaii: Asssistanee Pi-ogi-am fo the low and moderate -income homeowners that are residents of the City of Renton. I'ei-€o} Responsible forte censuring repairs are made in conformance with applicable laws, regulations, building codes, policies, and procedures. The housing Repair Assistance Program is funded by federal Community Development Block Grants (CDB(;), and must comply with all applicable federal regulations and requirements (for example historical preservations, and lead -based paint). \v,--S f-a�irtc�ec—}T iwide at. fskilled —maintenance iscs--fc'i7c'c'"i'n`a` age-, Skills and trdifling in all j and e Areas of responsibility include etistemersassessing homes for the safety and health hazards tfin-t—needing; repair; developing specifications requesting bids and preparing Request for Qualifications (RFQs) for work to be performed; maintaining a small iob roster,• inspecting completed work to ensure compliance with specifications and applicable laws codes and regulations_; coordination with volunteer groups; evaluation of the program; ensuring excellent customer service �, record -keeping and reporting; understanding correct application of C'DBG and contract requirements; developing and managing the program budget. May perform a variety of minor home repairs.. maintenane- maintains aeeur-ate Feeards and logs; and assists in the REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: the Community Development Bloek Grant (CI)BG) Fits and accordance with established policies and Develop and administer annual budget for the Housing Repair Assistance Program. Approves expenditures for the program. Review and approve purchase orders:. * Review, evaluate, and recommend changes to the Housing Repair Assistance Program policies andprocedures-.Research and seek monetary and in -kind donations for the program. Write applications for funding and donations. Develop: and maintain positive relationships with businesses that make donations. Housing Assistance Specialist - Continued Page 2 * Develop -program goals, objectives-,- a-nd timelines to accurately and adequately respond to public n.Recruit volunteers and volunteer groups to assist in performing repairs. Prioritize schedule, coordinate and supervise projects with volunteer groups. Provide direction/instructions to volunteers regarding the scope of work for repairs. * Analyze home velar needs of et Sden is have applied 4o- 44+e Frog -afw. 4; xph4 T the- -4' o usi n g Repair- A��e-- Vrog ffl {)ol ides - am Prue—ed 4rc,,P-f-e iii--4o-c4ients the -process Anvoved in -the repairs, -% repair services, eduv4tte- -dents - about w- 410tne "M:ntenance, and respond to-enner-gefw-y, calls.Conduct initial assessment of homes for safety and health hazards. When appropriate, docomplete final inspection of repairs to ensure compliance with applicable codes, contracts, rules, and regulations. n- er-Wrm und-4keet-ethers on fleFfOFmn„sresidential jou-ney-level--rear work- t+tdudin -� ", �•�,--ei+rf�ente3`� , windows e ,-dead usedpaint abatement, historiF-+eservatfen; lead and -radon testing of residences, end asbestos control vi-t fedeFal and program guidelines.Review, evaluate, and recommend changes to the Housing Repair Assistance Program policies and procedures. *--Cendttc­t- comprehen home i-Spections; e.,z.matenaturye# :f feasib T `P A-y fop necessary permits. Conduct .final with -work plans, sch"..'es budget, tN amicable s, building codes, and the C14BG controet. * 1'r-ovide training, dir-eetion and assistance to other Housing Repair- sta summer erew and sub eontmetors. Train, direet and lead assigned staff in the staff and efficient operation of all equipment used to complete worif assignments: Develop outcome measurements for the program. Review customer service survev results; with program manager and make changes as needed. *Develop specifications, request for bids, and prepare Request for Qualifications (RFQs) for work to be performed. Maintain a small _job roster. Evaluate contractors for timeliness and quality of repair. *Interpret and explain policies and regulations to clients and potential clients.; Rremain current regarding applicable laws, codes, rules and procedures. *Develop and maintain working relationships with other entities, such as King County Minor Home Repair Program, Masters Builders Association, and Rebuilding Together. Housing Assistance Specialist - Continued Page 3 *Help prevent future safety and health hazards by educating individual homeowners about home maintenance. *Ensure contract requirements with King County are met. *Review work order requests and assess the urgency of the repair and the depth of the repair to determine the appropriate contractor to do the work. .:� ......�:.....�n. materials,* Purchase tools,and equipment in compliance with budget-. *—Prepare and maintain accurate records including daily, monthly, and annual reports in computerized database programs. Assist in grogram outreach and marketing. Provide excellent customer service. Perform related duties as assigned. * Denotes Essential Job Functions KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Uniform Building Code (UBC), Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC), Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC), Uniform Housing Code (UHC), National Electrical Code (NEC), Washington State Energy Code (WSEC) related to residential construction and repairs. • Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Housing Urban Development (HUD), and Housing Repair Assistance Program's polices and procedures. • Department of Labor and Industries health and safety regulations. • Basic record -keeping methods. • Word processing, spreadsheet and/or database software. • Principles and practices of training and supervision. • How to do basic minor home repairs. • Provide excellent cEustomer sService. • Program evaluation tools, including outcomes and outputs. • Telephone techniques and etiquette. • City policies, procedures organization, and objectives. • Other community programs that can assist residents as needed. Housing Assistance Specialist - Continued Page 4 ABILITY TO: • Communicate effectively both orally and in writing. • Address and resolve potential or actual problems effectively as they occur in any of the housing programs. • Schedule and prioritize multiple projects and meet established deadlines. • Maintain accurate records on all programs, contractors and participants. • Read, interpret, apply and explain rules, regulations, codes, policies and procedures. • Make effective oral presentations at public hearings and meetings. • Prepare and maintain accurate records and generate reports, and the ability to collect, analyze and interpret data. n sist in the development of gran Prepare grant applications. • Establish and maintain cooperative and effective working relationships with clients community volunteers, contractors, and staff. • Operate machine1y, tools, and equipment relevant to the position. plumbing,�412ei,foFm the funetions i-equir-ed by the position inelading but not limited to , et-. •,t �o aL • Ability to lift up to W50 pounds. • Accurately inspect and assess needed repairs on residential and mobile homes. • Perform initial, interim, and final inspections of repairs to ensure compliance with applicable codes, contracts, rules, and regulations. • Plan,-ateprioritize and organize work • Work independently with minimum supervision. • Train, supervise, and provide work direction to others. EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE: Any combination equivalent to- graduation from high school; and three ye s of ;^"m e-ya capackjand two years experience in project management managing contracts general construction and building maintenance-_ LICENSES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS: Valid Washington State driver's license. WORKING CONDITIONS: Work is primarily performed in an office environment; and at client homes.., in eenf ned FS OF emerge_., may have to be peFfOFfned in homes sei-ved. Occasional weekend or evening hours required. Housing Assistance Specialist - Continued Page 5 Effective Date February 2005 Effective Pa+eRevised History; December 2001 Revised History December 2000 Revision History January 1995 CITY OF RENTON CLASS TITLE: ROUSING MAINTENANCE WORKER (MA-7126) BASIC FUNCTION: Under the direction of tl+e- lI{+mm+ assigned supervisor, perform a variety of work related to home maintenance and repair for the } 4*+m R-tIN i+ P+++u+a+++Ilousing- Rcpair Assistance 1'r(),(;ra_m: (HRAP).-„r+-+*v-itlt• i++i++t": 4Vpi+i+ +� +t +t+ f t't+r f+e+a++v +k+ wk - t+a+E+ a++tt p+++v++4e k-+wk- ti i+++c 1 t+N+t•+ ay,,;w,Hed.`11his includes_ minor repairs related to the health and_ safety of low and moderate -income homeowners, assessinghomes for needed repairs tl+at-itrt teaching preventativemaintenance and demonstrating how to do minor home repairs. for Renton residents. The program is funded by federal_ Community Development Block Grants _JCUBG), and_ must comply with all applicable federal regulations and requirements (for example, historical preservation and lead -based paint ahatemcmi REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES: * Perform a variety of home repairs acti-v+tit-, invf►I 4w, plE++0114t—, {•iWtA-tor-. elec"++l, fkm+4n+ , painting an4 rm repair Io+ 14+f+w Rv"i+related to the health and safety of the Housing Repair Assistance Program clients. This includes the installation of smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. It may include minor repairs such as repairing electrical switches or outlets, repairing faucets and/or toilets, checking breakers and fuses, installing or replacing locks, changing filters in furnaces, resetting garbage disposals, and caulking interior and exterior areas of the home. Repair -i n i utintuin t4ttn+h Fw, sy',itenis 1N` i et)i++i+N-, +►r f-eplac++?-, faHf{4s: h*t-watertanks, tt+ilets +++44f+++++syste s; kPite i+4)es M14 era w1 St l'e+lfir m ;+ a++etv +►f ++ft+en t f y w o F k ++elf+Ft+++g Ow re p a i F +►r t++++wt+ �+t t i++++ ►1' newsteps landings, hand Is 4+r wlievk4utif f+++++ps rty"-t ++r-fty+latk-+I+►f+r�; Mass• **4f�e+�: y Repai+- +►e replace ++utlets, U#4+ i+, 4x4c++c",-, -641V i-f-t larva4c— +4— ta4 4ises fepai+' s f i m I +t#p is+a+'+ Review (:i+e++++e+t++e­,�+a+d ilss 4 endin work orders and assess work procedures before beginning a job.-. +­e+e+a+++-+e *tke-d I:-++: t?+}+t+"Itl++t'y fvt)- + 0 +++++++,C44 to se+ i= i+;ei '� }�feth� +:e ;++�<1 ++►+i i fa t++i t+ iv++r k +rftie+:s ;ac; +tit+ i F ec1: VrAmt- t++—. a-e+++++ve deh l iti- +++<1 pt,4� +++H e++er++t var+l mai++te++a++ee 444 es a4 +ed:*Prepare and maintain records. This includes assessment forms, release of liability forms, bids, client applications, work orders, and any other necessary record keeping. Housing Maintenance Worker - Continued Page 2 * install and maintain smoke detectors; repitir (w--4!ep1a-ce-4+wk-.Y-a4id other Communicate with loeaI -contractors to f- eme+sleRe',Y- f coordinate work activities to assure timely and proper completion of repairs: and assure compliance with standard practices and building codes. Assist in maintaining a working inventory of parts and equipment. Assist in conducting initial assessments of client homes for health -and -safety related issues. *Help prevent future safety and health hazards by educating homeowners about home maintenance and basic repairs. This may be done on either an individual or group basis. *Comply with all applicable federal regulations and requirements relating to Community Development Block Grants, and ensure repairs are made in conformance with applicable laws, building codes, policies and procedures. Perform related duties as assigned. Denotes Essential Job Functions KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITIES: KNOWLEDGE OF: • Maintenance and repair of residential plumbing, electrical and mechanical systems. • Methods, practices, procedures, equipment and tools used in various trades including plumbing, carpentry and electrical. Health and safety regulations. Proper methods of utilizing and storing equipment, materials and supplies. Interpersonal skills using tact, patience and courtesy. Basic construction and remodeling methods and terminology. Principles of training and providing work direction. • Basic home repairs. • Building codes related to job functions. • Applicable laws codes regulations policies and procedures. • Record -keeping techniques. ABII..ITY TO: bA ,} CITY OF RENTON tip Human Resources & Risk Management Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Michael R. Webby, Administrator DATE: May 26, 2005 TO: Tern Briere, Council President Members of the City Council VIA: Kahby eolker-Wheeler, Mayor FROM: Webby, HR & RM Administrator SUBJECT: Salary Range Adjustment Recommendation BACKGROUND: Ms. Penny Bartley is the manager of the City's jail operation and also directs the staff services division. She has performed her duties and responsibilities since September 1, 1992. Her responsibilities include developing, budgeting and providing all forms of services required to operating our jail, manage all organization records, public disclosure requests, and public information responsibilities as well as represent the City of Renton and the Renton Police Department on various committees and associations. More recently, she has assumed responsibility for managing a very complex interlocal agreement among 37 public agencies relating to the collection, holding and transportation of detainees. In her capacity as Jail Manager she reports directly to the Deputy Chief of Police ISSUE: The Police Chief met with Eileen Flott and me and discussed his concerns related to Ms. Bartley's responsibilities, value to his Department and the City, as well as his concern about her level of compensation. He explained his interest in addressing internal equity within his management family. That is, adjusting her base salary level so her position would be in line with other division managers (Police Commanders) in the Police Department. In preparing for our discussion with the Chief, Eileen conducted a salary survey of Jail Manaers and found Ms. Bartley's current base wage to be significantly below our 60` percentile target. CONCLUSION: With this in mind, it is our recommendation the Jail Manager's salary is adjusted to m38/E from m34/E, which is approximately ten percent. With your approval we recommend the effective date of this salary adjustment to be January 1, 2005. cc: Garry Anderson, Police Chief Kevin Milosevich, Deputy Police Chief 1055 South Grady Way /-�R�enton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-7650 Ill —, ...,..o.—t.f.,< rn°/ r Ipd material '40 % DcAt Consumer RENTON AHEAD OF THE CURVE Police Manager Survey Detail with 2005 wages Police Manager GRADE DEPT m34 Police Position manages two police department divisions. In addition, the Police Manager negotiates million dollar contracts on behalf of 35 cities in King Count Position supervises and evaluate the performance of assigned personnle, responds to emergencies during off and on -duty hours, Oversees training, assignment, discipline i Investigates and resolves complaints, prepares, presents, and administers annual division budgets. Attends meetings and conferences pertaining to dept. operations. _ Particiapates in long and short range planning, conducts internal investigations. Adj Notes CRIES Population TOP OF SALARY RANGE Range _ Auburn 45,355 6131 6131 Detention Facility Supervisor 52 beds, depends on judge's sentence report to Assist Police Chief Bainbridge Island Bothell 21,350 30,910 Burien 31,480 n/m Des Moines 29,120 Edmonds 39,580 n/m Everett 95,470 n/m Federal Way 83,500 n/m Issaquah 1 15,110 5445 5445 Jail Manager 54 beds 1 yr maximum Reports to Police Commander Kent 84,210 7776 7776 Police Captain 130 beds,1 yr maximum report to Deputy Police Chief Kng County 8092 8092 Plus receive longevity, and education pay. May be like Police Captain position Krkland 45,630 7738 7738 Police Lt. 12 bed, max capacity is 18 30 day holding Lakewood 58,940 n/m Lynnwood 34,500 1 6729 6729 Detention Commander 34 beds, 60 days reports to Deptuy Police Chief Mercer Island 21,840 n/m ! Mountlake Terrace 20,380 _ Olympia 42,860Puyallup Redmond SeaTac Shoreline Snohomish Tacoma Tukwila 35,490 46,480 25,100 52,730 8,640_-- 196,300- 17,230 n/m n/m University Place 30,720 Renton 55,360 $ 7,206 $ 7,206 -6.9% $ 7,234 Median $ 7,234 60th Percentile 1 $ 7,738 $ 7,738 2005 Police Mgr Redass.xls Detail (2005) Page 1 1/18/2005 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Systems Division Staff Contact...... Sharon Griffin, ext. 7232 Subject: Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Arterial Street Plan Exhibits: Issue Paper Resolution 2006-2011 TIP Changes from Previous TIP Draft TIP (2006-2011), including Project Map, Exhibit A, and Map Index, Exhibit B, within document Arterial Street Plan, Exhibit C Al For Agenda of: Agenda Status: Consent .............. Public Hearing...... Correspondence.... Ordinance........... Resolution........... Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information......... Other ................ Interlocal June 20, 2005 X Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Transportation Committee and set Legal Dept.......... X Public Hearing date of July 11, 2005 Finance Dept....... X Fiscal Impact: Expenditure Required..... N/A Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted......... Revenue Generated......... Summary of Action: The City is required by law to annually review and adopt by resolution the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). In conjunction with this, the Arterial Street Plan is also updated. The proposed TIP includes three new projects: Rainier Avenue — S 4th Pl to S 2nd, Hardie Ave. SW Transit/Multi-modal, and the May Creek Bridge Replacement. Six completed or cancelled projects were dropped from the program. Staff Recommendations: The Council adopt: 1) the annual updates to the "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program"; 2) the "Arterial Street Plan"; and, 3) set July 11, 2005, as the public hearing on the TIP. Staff further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. H: Trans/planning/sgri ffin/T[Ps/2006_TIP_agendab i I I CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 20, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Kathy Keolker-WheTanning/Building/Public Mayor FROM: Gregg Zimmerma�l, Works Administrator STAFF CONTACT: Sharon Griffin, ext. 7232 SUBJECT: 2006-2011 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) ISSUE: Should the City Council approve the resolution adopting the 2006-2011 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)? RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Council adopt: 1) the annual updates to the "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program"; 2) the "Arterial Street Plan"; and, 3) set a July 11, 2005, public hearing on the TIP. Staff further recommends that the resolution regarding this matter be presented for reading and adoption. BACKGROUND: The City is required by law to annually review and adopt by resolution the Six -Year Trans- portation Improvement Program (TIP). The draft TIP is presented to the Transportation Committee and distributed to the rest of the Councilmembers for review in advance of the public hearing. In addition to the projected revenues and expenditures for the future six years, the TIP also includes current -year project allocations and past project expenditures. The City Council adopted the previous Six -Year TIP — 2005 through 2010, on July 26, 2004, as a planning document for the next six years. It was distributed to the Puget Sound Regional Council, the Washington State Department of Transportation, King County Department of Terri Briere, Council President Members of Renton City Council June 20, 2005 Page 2 Re: 2006-2011 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Transportation, the Association of Washington Cities, Puget Sound Energy, surrounding local agencies, the library, and to internal departments. A spreadsheet ("2006-2011 Six -Year TIP Summary") is attached which outlines the expected revenues and expenditures for the six -year period. The 2005 budget reallocation and increase of $2,382,300 is included as an estimated expenditure to correspond with the reallocation Ordinance 5134 (attached). The six -year estimated expenditures were balanced to fall within the expected revenues, leaving a balance of $42,011 on December 31, 2011, for the combined Fund 317 and Fund 305. The proposed six -year program required underfunding some future projects at this time to achieve the successful completion of other newly funded projects. Required funding levels for some of the newly funded projects were determined by the receipt of funding from outside sources that required City match: o #7 Rainier Avenue — S 41h Pl to S 2nd (Sound Transit funds) o #8 Hardie Avenue SW Transit/Multi-modal (Sound Transit funds) o #3 Strander Boulevard/SW 27th St, Phase 2, Segment 2a (State and federal funds) o #45 SR 169 HOV — 1401h to SR 900, Phase 3 (State transportation budget) o #19 May Creek Bridge Replacement is shown as a fully City funded project pending a grant. Some of the newly funded projects were determined by economic development needs that required City match: o # 12 South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements (Proposed funding by sale of bonds) o # 3 Strander Boulevard/SW 27th St, Phase 1, Segment 1 (Proposed funding by sale of bonds) • Some programs requested and received additional funding because of elevated priority: o # 1 Street Overlay Program o # 10 Walkway Program Some projects which may be delayed due to the above needs are: o #11 Rainier Avenue — SW 7th to 4th PI (the City is committed to 30% design and re-evaluation of the escalated construction costs) o #9 NE 3`dAth Corridor (limited funding has been allocated for small projects along the corridor) H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\ADMIN\Agenda 2005\IP 2006 TIP.doc Terri Briere, Council President Members of Renton City Council June 20, 2005 Page 3 Re: 2006-2011 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Ultimately, all projects in the TIP are presented to Council for review and approval, collectively during the budget process, and individually when approval is requested for design and construction contracts. Attachments: 2006-2011 Six -Year TIP Summary Fund 317 Capital Improvement Fund (Budget by Fund) Sheet Fund 305 Transportation Impact Mitigation Fund (Budget by Fund) Sheet Ordinance 5134 Budget Adjustments and Reallocation dated April 18, 2005 cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director Nick Afzali, Planning and Programming Manager Sharon Griffin, Program Development Coordinator Nenita Ching, P/B/PW Administrative Analyst Bang Parkinson, FIS/IS Supervisor Project File H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TATIADMIN\Agenda 2005\IP 2006 TIP.doc 2006 - 2011 Six -Year TIP Summary 6/9/2005 Transportation Capital Improvement Fund Fund 317 (including Fund 305) 2006-2011 Item Budget Comment FUND 317 REVENUE: Business License Fee $ 9,600,000 At $1,600,000 per year. Transportation Grants 11,596,292 Charge for Services/Plan Sales - Penalty/Gen. Bus. Lic. - Miscellaneous - Trf-In From 305 7,068,575 As shown below in Fund 305. Trf-In Fm Art Str Fd/Gas Tax 2,100,000 At $350,000 per year (Overlay Program). New Vehicle Fuel Tax 1,310,000 Varied annual amounts. Other In-Hand/Legislature 13,988,390 Includes $5 million from legislature Bonds 18,939,000 TOTAL NEW REVENUE $ 64,602,257 Use of Prior Yr Revenue for 2006-2011 5,787,933 TOTAL RESOURCES $ 70,390,190 EXPENDITURES: 2006-2011 TIP Projects (Funded) 70,390,190 Additional Estimated 2005 Expenditures 2,382,300 Approved budget increase and reallocation. TOTAL PROGRAMMED EXPENDITURES $ 72,772,490 SUMMARY: Use of Prior Yr Revenue 2006-2011 5,787,933 Use of Prior Yr Revenue Estimated 2005 2,382,300 USE OF PRIOR YR REVENUE TOTAL $ 8,170,233 Budgeted Fund Balance, January 1, 2006 8,197,876 Total New Revenue 64,602,257 Total Programmed Expenditures' (72,772,490) 317 Fund Balance, December 31, 2011 $ 27,643 FUND 305 Budgeted Fund Balance, January 1, 2006 3,482,943 Anticipated New Revenue 2006-2011 3,600,000 Estimated at $600,000 per year. z Total Committed Expenditures (7,068,575) Transfer to Fund 317 as shown above. 305 Fund Balance, December 31, 2011 $ 14,368 TOTAL FUND BALANCE 317 & 305 3 $ 42,011 . . -December 31, 2011 ' TIP #11 Rainier Ave (railroad bridge) may need further funding pending•en s cost estimate. 2 Dependent on development and credits. . ' a This addresses ability to fund program, not cash flow. .. . . 1:\SGriffin\TIPs\2006\6-Yr Revenue Analysis k JFund Capital Improvement — 317, Transportation Fund This fund supports City of Renton Transportation projects and projects linked with various State and Federal Funding programs. Many of the projects are dependent on acquisition of outside grants, formation of LID's and mitigation revenue. Investment earnings generated on the fund balance throughout the year are credited to the General Fund. Table 7-33. Fund 317, Transportation Capital Improvement Fund 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 Change 1 Item Actual Actual Adj Bdgt Actual Budget 04/05 REVENUE Per Capita Business License Fees Transportation Grants 1,790,890 2,277,504 1,631,474 2,175,881 1,936,400 2,150,000 1,637,081 930,096 1,600,000 1,920,500 -17.4% -10.7% Local Vehicle License Fee/Transp 466,822 11,683 350,000 0 0 -100.0% King County Wit 0 0 0 2,216,000 0 N/A Charges for Svcs/Plan Sales, Wisc 515 1,126 0 214 0 N/A King County Reimbursement/Duvall Ave 0 0 0 169,677 1,311,300 100.0% Transfer In Fund 000 0 575,000 0 0 0 N/A Transfer In Fund 102 353,500 353,500 0 353,500 0 N/A Transfer In Fund 220 0 425,000 0 0 0 N/A Transfer In Fund 301 0 0 1,500,000 1,500,000 0 -100.0% Transfer In Fund 305 1,200,000 533,300 1,389,300 721,000 1,313,400 -5.5% TOTAL NEW REVENUE 6,089,231 5,706,965 7,325,700 7,527,568 6,145,200 -16.1 Use of Prior Yr Revenue 0 0 3,350,700 0 1,841,300 -45.0•1a TOTAL RESOURCES 6,089,231 5,706,965 10,676,400 7,527,568 7,986,500 -25.2•0 EXPENDITURES: TBZ Planning Studies 0 0 0 0 0 WA Professional Services 136,146 125,495 100,000 99,885 125,000 25.001 Transportation Projects 4,629,221 4,136,863 10,576,400 5,177,125 7,861,500 -25.7% Transfer Out Fund 125 14,192 0 0 3,278 0 N/A TOTAL COMviTTED EXPENDfURES 4,779,559 4,262,358 10,676,400 5,280,288 7,986,500 -25.2•10 Increase to Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 N/A TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,779,559 4,262,358 10,676,400 5,280,288 7,986,500 -25.2•10 Fund Balance, January 1 5,537,618 6,847,290 8,291,896 8,291,896 10,539,176 27.1% 1 Total New Revenue 6,089,231 5,706,965 7,325,700 7,527,568 6,145,200 -16.1 Total Committed Expenditures (4,779,559) (4,262,358) (10,676,400) (5,280,288) (7,986,500) -25.201. Fund Balance plus Reserves 6,847,290 8,291,896 4,941,196 10,539,176 8,697,876 76.0% Reserve: KCWitigation/StranderBlvd 0 0 0 0 500,000 '0070%'.'.'.'.'-' Fund Balance, Dec 31 6,847,290 8,291,896 4,941,196 10,539,176 8,197,876 sl ' .......... Budget by Fund 35-54 Fund 305, Transportation Impact Mitigation Fund Fund 305 was created for the purpose of identifying Transportation Impact Mitigation revenue and expenditures. Mitigation fees are charged to new • development projects within Renton city limits using a vehicle trip rate which �[ has been established based on the number of vehicle trips generated between •[ 1990 and 2010 by new development. The Designated Fund Balance is for city identified projects in the 2005-2010 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and j the 2005-2010 Transportation Capital Improvement Program (TCIP). JTable 7-29. Fund 305, Transportation Impact Mitigation Fund 2002 2003 2004 2004 2005 Change Item Actual Actual Adj Bdgt Actual Budget 04/05 REVENUE - Transportation Mitigation Fees 1,001,645 388,768 500,000 915,752 500,000 0.0. Investment Interest 90,534 161,347 150,000 35,404 100,000 -33.3' Transfer In Fund 316 0 0 107,000 107,000 0 -100.0% TOTAL NEW REVENUE 1,092,179 550,115 757,000 1,058,156 600,000 -20.7% Use of Prior Yr Revenue 0 0 632,300 0 713,400 12.8% TOTAL RESOURCES 1,092,179 550,115 1,389,300 1,058,156 1,313,400 -5.59*1 i J J IXPENIATUFiES: Transfer Out Fund 317 1,200,000 712,325 1,389,300 721,000 1,313,400 -5.5% TOTAL COM VTED EXPENDffURES 1,200,000 712,325 1,389,300 721,000 1,313,400 -5.5 , Increase to Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 N/A TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,200,000 712,325 1,389,300 721,000 1,313,400 =5.5% Fund Balance, January 1 4,129,217 4,021,396 3,859,186 Total New Revenue 1,092,179 550,115 757,000 Total ComrittedExpenditures (1,200,000) (712,325) (1,389,300 Designated Fund Balance 4,021,396 3,859,186 3,226,886 Undesignated Fund Balance, Dec 31 0 0 0 3,859,186 4,196,343 8.7•1 1,058,156 600,000-20.7•1* (721,000) (1,313,400) :55q 4,196,343 3,482,943 0 0 tBudget by Fund 1 31-54 ta Amends ORD: 5110 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 5134 % AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5110 RELATING TO THE CITY OF RENTON 2005 ANNUAL BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND BALANCE, INCREASING THE 2005 BUDGET, AND REALLOCATING THE EXPENDITURES IN SPECIFIC TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS. WHEREAS, the City Council passed the 2005 Annual Budget Ordinance (Ordinance No. 5110) on December 20, 2004; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and advisable to amend the 2005 budget to accommodate new grants and other revenue and corresponding expenditures to complete transportation projects; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following adjustments are hereby allowed and established in fund listed below: Fund 2005 Budget Beginning Fund Balance, Jan. 1, 2005 $ 10,539,176 Total New Revenue 6,145,200 Total Committed Expenditures 7,986,500 Budget Adjustments Per this Ordinance 2,382,300 Total Adjusted Budget $ 10,368,800 Ending Fund Balance, Dec. 31, 2005 $ 6,315,576 SECTION H. A list of all individual budget adjustments in the Transportation Capital Fund is hereby attached as Attachment A, and is available for public review in the office of the City Clerk, Renton City Hall. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 513 4 SECTION M. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 18 th day of April 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 18th day of April . 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, ity Attorney Date of Publication: 4/ 2 2/ 2 0 0 5 (summary) ORD:1172:4/7/05:ma W Kathy Ke lker-Wheeler, Mayor 2 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, UPDATING THE CITY'S SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2006-2011. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has heretofore adopted a "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program" pursuant to RCW 35.77.010, and the plan and program having been amended and modified from time to time as authorized by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, held a public hearing on July 11, 2005, after notice to the public as provided by law for the purpose of considering adoption, modification, and amendments of the plan and program; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing held on July 11, 2005, due consideration was given to the proposed changes and amendments for the purpose of updating the plan and program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City's "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial Street Plan" are hereby further amended and modified, all as more particularly shown on the attached Exhibits "A," "B" and "C" incorporated herein as if fully set forth. SECTION II. The plan and program, as evidenced by said Exhibits, shall be and constitute the City's "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial Street Plan," and shall remain in full force and effect until further revised, amended, and modified as provided by law. 1 6-2 RESOLUTION NO. SECTION III. The Administrator of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to file this Resolution, together with the Exhibits, with the Director of Highways for the State of Washington and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1114:6/9/05:ma 4 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP C�I:h��CrI��33dri�J7��1[�I1���1 New TIP Old TIP Project No. Project Title Changes From Previous TIP / Comments 1 1 12108 Street Overlay Program Increased 2005 and 2006 funding significantly. 2 2 12138 SR 167/SW 27th SUStrander By No change. 3 3 12239 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 30% design nearingcompletion all phases; construction start 2005. 4 5 12163 Renton Urban Shuffle (RUSH) No change. 5 r8 6 12109 Transit Program No change. 6 7 12193 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Im rov. Two new projects originatingfrom this stud split off into next two projects. 7 New 12501 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd New project pendingSound Transit Board fundingapproval. New 12502 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal New project pending Sound Transit Board funding approval. 9 8 12176 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor Final report adopted by Council May 2005. Projects pending available funds. 10 9 9 Walkway Program 2005 funding doubled to address pilot sidewalk rehabilitation project. 11 16 12308 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI Will proceed to 30% design; re-evaluate increased construction costs/funds. 12 10 12306 S Lake Wash. Roadway Im rov. The City will apply for bonds to fund this project. 13 12 12194 South Renton Project Design complete; construction in 2005 and 2006 pending reserve fund transfer. 14 13 12210 1-405 in Renton Staff time will increase for project impact due to additional le islative funding. 15 14 12150 -improvements Project Develo ment/Predesi n No change. 16 15 12209 NE 4th SUHo uiam Av NE Design complete; construction may roceed with development in 2006. 17 18 29 lArterial Circulation Program No change. 18 19 106 JBridge inspection & Repair Houser Way bridge to be painted in 2006; May Creek Bridge split off. 19 New 12503 May Creek Bridge Replacement New project; grant submitted for replacement project. 20 20 16 Loop Replacement Program No change. 21 21 12113 Sign Replacement Program No change. 22 22 91 Pole Program No change. 23 23 12171 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access No change, 24 24 12115 Traffic Safety Program Pre-empt Program complete in 2005; two new programs LED and UPS). 25 25 12162 Traffic Efficiency Program Upgrading signal controllers with new centrals stem continues into 2006. 26 26 12185 JCBD Bike & Ped. Connections Curb ramp upgrades complete in 2005; emphasis on sidewalk preservation. 27 27 12186 Arterial Rehab. Frog. Continue paving schedule. 28 28 12123 Duvall Ave NE Increase in construction estimate; delayed by environmental/drainage issues. 29 30 12166 RR Crossing Safety Pro . No change. 30 31 12135 TDM Program No change. 31 32 12107 Transportation Concurrency No change. 32 33 12106 Missing Links Program No chan e. 33 34 12206 IGIS Needs Assessment Work plan expected to be completed in 2005. 34 35 12127 JGrady Wy Corridor Study Project proposal for study to be under development and review by late 2005. 35 36 12173 Bicycle Route Dev. Program Miscellaneous facilities reviewed. 36 37 12121 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk Waiting for developer to continue construction. 37 38 12140 Interagency Signal Coord. In construction in 2005. 38 39 12187 Environmental Monitoring Attempting to get early acceptance for Phase 1 site due to its success. 39 40 12191 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. Program extended through 2008. 40 41 12146 WSDOT Coordination Program No change. 41 42 12112 1% for the Arts Increases expected due to aggressive design and construction ro ram. 42 43 12160 Arterial HOV Program No change. 43 44 12177 Park -Sunset Corridor Study to be initiated in 2005; consultant selection 2006. 44 45 24 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd No change. 45 4 12175 SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR900 AllPhases now funded through grants and legislative funding. 46 17 12309 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main Partial construction 2005; WSDOT 1-405 project to absorb southern 1,000 feet. 47 29 12301 Sunset/Duvall Intersection Increase in construction estimate; going to ad August 2005. 48 47 12303 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair No change. 49 48 12304 Carr/Mill Signal No change. 50 51 12213 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett No change. 51 53 12302 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane Contract lower than estimate; design higher. 52 54 12307 Monster Road Bride Project construction complete; reports due in June. 53 56 12305 Duvall Ave NE - King County Construction delayed to 2006 due to environmental/drainage issues. Drop 11 12401 SR 169 Corridor Study WSDOT lead agency; City will contribute $50,000 in 2005. Dro 46 12129 Benson Rd S / S 31 st Project dropped by King County. Drop 49 12174 Transit Priority Signal System City project complete; King County to complete in 2005. Drop 50 12208 Transit Center Video Project complete. Drop 52 12211 Trans Valley ITS Project complete in 2005. Drop 55 12153 SW 7th St/Lind Ave. SW Construction complete. Planning/Building/ Di thlir, XA1r%A-c DRAFT Six -Year Transportation Improvement CITY OF Promote citywide economic development *Continue aggressive redevelopment efforts Downtown and in the Highlands *Facilitate quality development of waterfront land *Recruit and retain businesses to ensure a diversified emblovment base *Transition surplus industrial properties to their highest and best use Promote neighborhood revitalization *Support the vitality of neighborhoods through community involvement and improved infrastructure *Ensure quality development citywide *Create opportunities for new investment in the Highlands and South Renton neighborhoods VISION Renton: A world -class city where people choose to live, work, and play MISSION The City of Renton, in partnership with residents, businesses, and schools is dedicated to: • Providing a healthy atmosphere to live and raise families • Encouraging responsible growth and promoting economic vitality • Creating a positive community work environment • Meeting service demands through innovation and commitment to excellence Promote the City's image in the community and region . • Engage our diverse citizenry in City goals, . challenges, and • achievements • *Continue the City's marketing efforts • through expanded partnerships • Project Renton's . positive image through • superior service delivery Meet the service demands that contribute to the livability of the community *Develop and maintain quality City infrastructure, amenities, and services *Provide efficient services through partnering, innovation, and outcome management •Support productivity through training, tools, and technology Influence regional decisions that impact the City *Aggressively pursue transportation and other regional improvements and services that benefit Renton . *Ensure that • annexations, service changes, and other • agreements benefit Renton •Actively oppose . unfunded mandates • and other proposals that negatively impact • Renton 1-2 SECTION ONE PURPOSE OF SIX -YEAR TIP PROGRAM • Purpose of Six -Year TIP 1-1 • Vision Statement 1-2 • Mission Statement 1-2 • City Business Plan 1-2 CITY OF RENTON SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2006-2011 PURPOSE • Reflects involvement by citizens and elected officials. • Implements the City of Renton Mission Statement. • Used to coordinate transportation projects and programs with other jurisdictions and agencies. • Multi -year planning tool for the development of the transportation facilities within the City. • Required for State and Federal funding programs. • Vital part of planning under the Growth Management Act. • Mandated by State Law. 1-1 SECTION TWO SIX -YEAR TIP MAP • TIP Map, Exhibit A 2-1 • Map Index, Exhibit B 2-2 1� 4 a ��-SA4 Exhibit A CITY OF RENTON SIX - YEAR T.I.P. 2006 - 2011 Project Map O S i { 19 53 }�aY O } t1Zi�WW u 28 IF �� 36 III -lU�, )I 43 es�N�[ 11 � � �I �l • 47 d = 21 k4l ref l- g 16 � I l 23 ��� �� rsln lI °� II " I)- y ' ,� "S , ^�� �- ([]�fl?®� • �� � Jam( � � n z , m �— jJ cLILT l 34 - -. , 52 l r� r �W V 46+'' J �»��_ ~\1tP'n '�5 `+•�`t4 3 tE \\x��� rI II •l M� \ � J( kb )� M � INNA �II � � i��.,.�� ea ��� { of •lam �� - , II �I� �����fL 7f��1 rz�( I( �iJT�\�_"�'r�� t,o,�?��w' ��` ; � x—, I }� Y� III �` �� ___ � �� �_ �� � � - • �I MT .L_ R JL �J� � i! �����)-J✓ I� E�Rt ' � ILA IL �j� �� ( • Y/l)1fJ J`_,. 49 2-1 EXHIBIT `B' City of Renton 2006 — 2011 Transportation Improvement Program Map Index TIP No. Project Title 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR167/SW 27th Street/ Strander Boulevard 3 Strander Blvd/SW 271h Street Connection 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Avenue Corridor Study and Improvements 7 Rainier Ave — S 41h PI to S 2nd 8 Hardie Ave SW Transit/Multi-modal 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Ave — SW 7th to 41h Pl 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improvement 13 South Renton Project 14 I-405 Improvements In Renton 15 Project Development/Predesign 16 NE 41h Street/Hoquiam Avenue NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection and Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Replacement Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections 27 Arterial Rehabilitation Program 28 Duvall Avenue NE 29 Railroad Crossing Safety Program 30 TDM Program 31 Transportation Concurrency 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Way Corridor Study 35 Bicycle Route Development Program 36 Lake Washington Boulevard — Park Avenue N to Coulon Park 37 Interagency Signal Coordination 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley and Soos Creek Corridor 2-2 2006 — 2011 SIX -YEAR Transportation Improvement Program Map Index TIP No. Project Title 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1 % for the Arts Program 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park —Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Avenue —SW 16t' to SW 43 rd 45 SR169 HOV — SE140" to SR 900 46 Benson Road — S 26'h to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Avenue Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Way S — Main to Burnett 51 Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE — King County 2-3 EXHIBIT `B' HAFII-E SYS\TRP\TRP-24\2006 TIP Map Index SECTION THREE DEVELOPMENT & PRIORITIZATION OF THE SIX- YEAR TIP • General Programming Criteria 3-1 • Specific TIP Development Activities 3-3 • Summary Table of Projects and Programs: 3-5 DEVELOPMENT AND PRIORITIZATION OF THE SIX -YEAR TIP I. General Programming Criteria The yearly update of the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is part of an on -going process intrinsically linked with the development of the City's Capital Improvement Program. The Six -Year TIP is also linked with various state and federal funding programs, regional/inter- jurisdictional planning and coordination processes and the City's Growth Management Act Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Projects are developed and prioritized based on both specific goals to be achieved by the program and on general programming considerations. Those general programming considerations are: Planning. How, on both a local and regional level, a project fits with or addresses identified future transportation goals, demands and planning processes must be evaluated. This is strongly influenced by ongoing land use decisions and by regional highway and transit system plans. Financing. Many projects are dependent on acquisition of outside grants, formation of LID's or the receipt of mitigation funds. Prioritization has to take into account the peculiarities of each of the various fund sources and the probabilities of when, and how much, money will be available. Scheduling. If a project is interconnected with, or interdependent on, other projects taking place, this is reflected in their relative priorities. Past Commitment. The level of previous commitment made by the City in terms of resources, legislative actions or inter -local agreements also must be taken into consideration in prioritizing TIP projects. In addition to the general considerations discussed above, there are five specific project categories through which the TIP is evaluated and analyzed. They are: • Preservation of Existing Infrastructure • Multi -Modal and Transportation Demand Management • Community Livability and Enhancement • Economic Development • Operations and Safety These categories provide a useful analysis tool and represent goals developed through an evaluation of the City's transportation program in response to input from citizens and local officials and to State and Federal legislation. Taken as a whole, the five categories provide a framework for evaluating projects both individually and as part of a strategy that seeks to meet and balance the transportation needs of Renton during a 3-1 time of increasing transportation demand, decreasing revenues and growing environmental concerns. Although each project can be identified with an important concern that allows it to be classified into one of the five categories, most projects are intended to address, and are developed to be compatible with, multiple goals. Preservation of the Existing Infrastructure is a basic need that must be met by the program. The Mayor, City Council and Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee have all addressed the importance of sustaining strong programs in this project category. The state Growth Management Act also requires jurisdictions to assess and address the funding required to maintain their existing transportation system. Multi -modal and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) projects and programs are oriented toward "moving people" through a balanced transportation system that involves multiple modes of transportation and provides alternatives to the existing heavy reliance on the single occupant vehicle (SOV). Included are facilities that facilitate the movement of transit and carpools, and programs that promote the use of high occupancy vehicles (HOV's) and reduce the number of SOV's. The Federal Transportation Efficiency Act (TEA-21), the State and Federal Clean Air legislation and the State Commute Trip Reduction Act (CTR) have added momentum to regional efforts and placed requirements on local jurisdictions such as Renton to promote these transportation elements. Community Livability and Enhancement consists of projects that have been developed with major emphasis on addressing community quality of life issues by improving and/or protecting residential livability while providing necessary transportation system improvements. Bicycle and pedestrian projects are included in this category. Economic Development projects and programs involve transportation improvements necessitated by new development that is taking place. Thus, a significant source of local funding for these projects is projected to come from mitigation payments and from specific access needs financed by new development. Operations and Safety projects and programs are developed through on -going analyses of the transportation system and are directed mainly toward traffic engineering concerns such as safety and congestion. Projects are identified not only by analysis of traffic counts, accident records and geometric data, but also through review and investigation of citizen complaints and requests. Following this text are tables that display and summarize the six -year funding plan broken out in accordance with the five program categories. ?7P FLJM.doc 3-2 Below is a more specific discussion of the activities involved in TIP development. II. Specific TIP Development Activities TIP project and financial development activities are intricately intertwined and involve interactions with many groups and agencies at the local, regional, state and federal levels. Within the Transportation Systems Division of the City of Renton, project development involves year -around coordination among the Maintenance and Operations Section, the Planning and Program Section and the Design Section. The Transportation Maintenance and Operations Section compiles accident and traffic count data, performs level of service calculations needed to identify operational/congestion problems and tracks all transportation -related complaints, suggestions and requests that come into the City. The Transportation Design Section, through the TIP's "Overlay Program" and "Bridge Inspection and Repair Program", works closely with the Maintenance Services Division and with its Pavement Management System to establish structural ratings for the City's roads and bridges. These and other data are being used by the Planning and Program Section to develop transportation improvement projects, prepare grant applications, interface with ongoing state and federal transportation programs, and develop a TIP that supports the goals of the City's long range Comprehensive Plan and short range business plan. Two important examples of how this data is used are: 1. To complete Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Arterial Inventory Worksheet forms for each section of each arterial in the City and 2. To complete Washington State Bridge Inventory System (WSBIS) forms for each bridge. These forms provide a ranking of overall deficiency both within the City and in comparison with similar facilities elsewhere in the state. These rankings, in turn, become important elements in securing funding from the TIB's Transportation Partnership Program (TPP) and Arterial Improvement Program (AIP) and from the federal bridge program. The data are also used in making other grant applications for hazard elimination and safety projects and for railroad crossing upgrades and other federal programs under TEA-21. The Transportation Planning Section works with Metro Transit, the Puget Sound Regional Council, Sound Transit and other groups and agencies to assure consistency between Renton's transportation policies and programs and those of the region. Such consistency is required by the Growth Management Act and related legislation and by federal and state grant programs. On -going transportation planning activities, such as updating the Transportation Element and traffic model, coordinating with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the development of sub -area plans, TIP FUND.doc 3-3 such as the Central Business District, the Valley and the North Renton areas, play an important part in identifying and prioritizing transportation improvement projects. State and regional transportation projects also play an important role such as those involving Sound Transit, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and the State Systems Plan. Within the City of Renton, there are actions and interactions involving other departments and divisions, the private sector, the City Council and Administration, which strongly influence the direction of the transportation program. For example, the transportation system is significantly impacted by land use decisions, private development proposals and by public water and sewer extensions which increase transportation demand by making possible higher density and/or intensity of land uses. Such proposals need to be monitored and analyzed in regard to how they individually and collectively create the need for transportation improvements. All departments and divisions in the City, the City Council, the Administration and the Mayor's Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee are solicited each year to provide input, discuss and comment on the Six -Year TIP. Additional input is also gathered through interactions with other public and private organizations and through public meetings held in the community concerning specific transportation projects and programs. At the City, State and Federal level there are new laws and regulations that create the need for new or different kinds of transportation projects and programs. Examples include the Transportation Efficiency Act (TEA-21), the Growth Management Act, the Clean Air Act, the Commute Trip Reduction law, the Endangered Species Act and the Surface Water Management Ordinance. All of these laws have tremendous impacts on the development and costs of transportation projects. Interconnection and/or interdependence among TIP projects and with projects by other City departments and by other jurisdictions is another important element that affects the development, the prioritization and the timing of transportation projects. Equally important is the likelihood, the time frame and the amount of outside funding that will be obtainable to finance transportation projects. In summary, with its heavy dependence on many different and unpredictable sources of outside funding and with the significant impacts created by on -going local and regional land use decisions, transportation project development is a continuous activity comprised of a multitude of diverse elements. TIP FUND.doc 3-4 CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING / BUILDING/ PUBLIC WORK" TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION - 2006-2011 TIP T e Tlh I Project Title Project No. Previous Costs 2006 2007 2w.. 2009 2010 2011 Six -Year Period Total Total Project Cost Funded -._nded 1 Street Overlay Program 12108 1,093,500 655,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 2,680,000 3,773,500 3,773,500 11 Rainier Av-SW7thto4th PI 12308 323,454 871,000 1,285,000 1,000,000 3,360,000 20,000 6,536,000 6,859.454 3,860,854 2,998,605 13 South Renton Project 12194 305,000 395,000 75,000 470,000 775,000 775,000 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 106 125,538 220,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 420,000 545,538 545,538 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 12503 120,000 710,000 5,000 835,000 835,000 835,000 u 20 Loop Replacement Program 16 33,807 20,000 20,000 110,000 20,000 20,0001 20,000 120,000 153,807 153,807 3` 21 Sign Replacement Program 12113 9,358 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 45,000 54,358 54,358 2 22 Pole Program 91 44,200 25,000 25,000 115,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 194,200 194,200 27 Arterial Rehab. Prog. 12186 388,916 240,000 205,000 310,000 230,000 180,000 180,000 1,375,000 1,763,916 1,763,916 28 Duvall Ave NE 12123 1,381,419 2,474,800 447,000 2,921,800 4,303,219 4,303,219 33 GIS Needs Assessment 12206 36,682 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 135,000 171,682 171,682 38 Environmental Monitoring 12187 184,838 75,000 50,000 b0,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 429,838 429,838 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 12303 1 1 460,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 12302 1 637,600 2,400 2,400 640,000 640,000 52 MonsterRoad Bridge 12307 671,934 27,000 27,000 698,934 698,934 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County 12305 810,174 3,169,190 524,000 3,693,190 4,503,364 4,503,364 2 SR 167/SW 27th SUStrander By 12138 358,596 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 55,000 413,596 413,596 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 12163 6,142 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 36,142 36,142 5 Transit Program 12109 32,359 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 122,406 154,759 _ 154.759 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 12193 287,652 20,000 20,000 ?0,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 407,652 407,652 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 12501 10,000 2,197,000 1,943,000 2,160,000 6,300,000 6,310,0001 3,310,000 3,000,000 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 12502 1 190,000 2,577,000 6,070,000 6,500,000 15,147,000 15,337,000 3,337,000 12,000,000 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 12176 212,147 314,000 394,500 413,000 5,017,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 12,738,500 12,950,647 1,333,647 11,617,000 15 Project Development/Predesign 12150 274,708 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 1,424,708 1,424,708 ? 17 Arterial Circulation Program 29 324,711 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 1,300,000 1,624,711 1,624,711 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 12171 58,967 5,000 5,000 63,967 63,967 30 TDM Program 12135 118,805 64,200 64,200 C4,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 385,200 504,005 504,005 34 Grady Wy Corridor Study 12127 20,619 35,000 120,000 E10,000 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 3,295,000. 3,315,619 315,619 3,000,000 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 12191 6,886 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,00(i 21,886 21,886 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 12146 24,137 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 65,000 89,137 89,137 42 Arterial HOV Program 12160 127,354 10,000 10,000 137,354 137,354 43 ParkSunset Corridor 12177 26,277 50,000 390,000 440,000 466,277 466,277 45 1 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 12175 2,015,391 1,755,400 2,080,000 2,500,000 6,335,400 8,350,791 8,350,791 10 Walkway Program 9 516,832 250,000 250,000 260,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 2,016,832 1,776,832 240,000 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 12173 34,342 20,000 18,000 18,000 110,000 80,000 80,000 326,000 360,342 270,342 90,000 0 41 1%for the Arts 12112 33,278 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 230,000 263,278 263,278 -� 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 12309 222,963 2,500 2,500 225,463 225,463 > 3 Strander Bv/SW 27th St Connect. 12239 2,491,727 6,369,000 1,750,000 34,174,000 5,748,000 48,041,00(' 50,532,727 13,753,927 36,778,800 0 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improv, 12306 2,050,773 17,507,000 00 3,432,0 16,950,000 37,889,00( 39,939,773 22,989,773 16,950,000 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 12210 72,271 30,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 90,000 162,271 162,271 0 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 12185 74,956 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 374,956 374,956 u 31 Trans Concurrent 12107 40,047 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 110,000 150,047 150,047 w 36 1 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 12121 317,418 84,500 141,600 226,10C 543,518 543,518 16 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 12209 172,200 227,800 227,800 400,000 400,000 a 24 Traffic Safety Program 12115 145,351 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 240,000 385,351 385,351 A 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 12162 361,589 157,000 98,000 i5,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 420,000 781,589 781,589 29 RR Crossing Safety Prey. 12166 5,182 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 30,00(- 35,182 35,182 32 Missing Links Program 12106 56,886 30,000 30,000 i0,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 236,886 236,886 0 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 12140 19,572 12,000 12,000 31,572 31,572 q 44 Lind Av -SW 16thSW43rd 24 5,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 2,545,000 2,550,000 10,000 2,540,000 47 SunseUDuvallIntersection 12301 909,561 33,300 33,300 942,861 942,861 O 49 CarrlMill Signal 12304 2,000 3,000 10,000 �_0,000 340,000 400,000 10,000 783,00(! 785,000 35,000 750,000 so Houser Wy S -Main to Burnett 12213 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 Total Sources 17.673.118 35.916.990113 222 200 5,963,100 52,966,100 38 724100 14 832 100 16 624 590 179 179,297,708, 88,063,308 91,234,400 q tom, 3-5 SECTION FOUR EXPENDITURES & REVENUES • Total Project Expenditure Summary 4-1 • Summary of Funding Sources 4-2 • Itemized Funding Sources: ■ Vehicle Fuel Tax 4-3 ■ Business License Fee 4-4 ■ Proposed Fund Balance 4-5 ■ Grants In -hand 4-6 ■ Mitigation In -Hand 4-7 ■ Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed 4-8 ■ Other In -Hand 4-9 ■ Grants Proposed 4-10 ■ Mitigation Proposed 4-11 ■ L.I.D.'s Proposed 4-12 ■ Other Proposed 4-13 ■ Undetermined 4-14 Note: The Vehicle License Fee was eliminated by initiative I-776 and has been dropped from the 2006-2011 program. CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Six -Year Project Cost Summary * TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 655,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 2,680,000 2 SR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 55,000 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 6,369,000 1,750,000 34,174,000 5,748,000 48,041,000 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 5 Transit Program 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 122,400 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 2,197,000 1,943,000 2,160,000 6,300,000 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 2,577,000 6,070,000 6,500,000 15,147,000 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 314,000 394,500 413,000 5,017,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 12,738,500 10 Walkway Program 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,0001 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 871,000 1,285,000 1,000,000 3,360,000 20,000 6,536,000 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improv. 17,507,000 3,432,000 16,950,000 37,889,000 13 South Renton Project 395,000 75,000 470,000 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 30,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 90,000 15 Project Development/Predesign 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 16 NE 4th St/Ho uiam Av NE 227,800 227,800 17 Arterial Circulation Program 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 1,300,000 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 220,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 420,000 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 120,000 710,000 5,000 835,000 20 Loop Replacement Program 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 21 Sign Replacement Program 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 45,000 22 Pole Program 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 5,000 5,000 24 Traffic Safety Program 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 240,000 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 157,000 98,000 75,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 420,000 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 27 Arterial Reha6. Pro . 240,000 205,000 340,000 230,000 180,000 180,000 1,375,000 28 Duvall Ave NE 2,474,800 447,000 2,921,800 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 30 TDM Program 64,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 385,200 31 Trans Concurrency 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 110,000 32 Missing Links Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 33 GIS Needs Assessment 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 135,000 34 Grady Wy Corridor Study 35,000 120,000 80,000 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 3,295,000 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 20,000 18,000 18,000 110,000 80,000 80,000 326,000 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 84,500 141,600 226,100 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 12,000 12,000 38 Environmental Monitoring 75,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 65,000 41 1% for the Arts 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 230,000 42 Arterial HOV Program 10,000 10,000 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 50,000 390,000 440,000 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 2,545,000 45 SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR900 1,755,400 2,080,000 2,500,000 6,335,400 46. Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 2,500 2,500 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 33,300 33,300 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 460,000 460,000 49 Carr/Mill Signal 3,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,000 10,000 783,000 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 810,000 810,000 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 2,400 2,400 52 Monster Road Bride 27,000 1 27,000 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County 3,169,1901 524,0001 1 3,693,190 Total Expenditures 35,916,9901 13,222,2001 5,963,1001 52,966,1001 38,724,100 14,832,100 161,624,590 -Y«,_p.J_s_ 'Including unfunded amounts. .10 4-1 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP SUMMARY OF FUNDING SOURCES Period ITEM Period Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 SIX -YEAR PROJECT COSTS: Project Development 3,592,000 744,000 644,600 564,600 524,600 569,600 544,600 Precon En /Admin 10,732,600 2,061,600 568,000 171,000 5,014,000 2,428,000 490,000 R-O-W includes Admin 10,272,000 2,949,000 650,000 5,500,000 1,173,000 Construction Contract Fee 123,601,390 27,342,890 9,898,700 4,537,700 37,747,700 31,383,700 12,690,700 Construction En /Admin 11,792,100 2,505,000 1,060,900 422,300 3,772,300 3,047,300 984,300 Other 1,634,500 314,500 400,000 267,500 407,500 122,500 122,500 Sub - TOTAL SIX -YEAR COST 161,624,690 35,916,990 13,222,200 5,963,100 52,966,100 38,724,100 14,832,100 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 3,410,000 440,000 565,000 585,000 595,000 610,000 615,000 Business License Fee 9,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600 000 Proposed Fund Balance 5,787,933 1,352,800 1,608,533 280,000 908,600 893,000 745,000 Grants In -Hand 11,596,292 5,155,000 3,724,892 600,000 2,116,400 Mitigation In -Hand 7,068,575 1,400,800 1,718,575 348,900 749,500 1,417,900 1,432,900 Bonds / L.I.D.'s Formed 18,939,000 15,507,000 3,432,000 Other In -Hand 13,988,390 10,461,390 573,200 2,549,200 306,200 49,200 49,200 Sub - TOTAL SIX -YEAR FUNDED 70,390,190 35,916,990 13,222,200 5,963,100 6,275,700 4,570,100 4,442,100 Grants Proposed 2,084,000 1,884,000 200,000 Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed 19,480,000 7,780,000 5,700,000 6,000,000 Undetermined 69,670,400 37,026,400 28,254,000 4,390,000 TOTAL SOURCES - FUNDED & UNFUNDED 161,624,590 35,916,990 13,222,200 5,963,100 52,966,100 38,724,100 14,832,100 Summ_ol_Soume 06/09/2005 13:03 4-2 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Vehicle Fuel Tax TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 3502000 2,100,000 2 SR 167/SW 27th SUStrander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 240,000 240,000 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 110,000 110,000 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 155,000 155,000 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 90,000 215,000 235,000 540,000 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 245,000 20,000 265,000 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Im rov. 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Develo ment/Predesi n 16 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair_._ 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program _ 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrent 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Stud 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1% for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 45 SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR900 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources 440,000 1 565,000 585,000 595,000 610,000 615,000 3,410,000 arovmos eao 4-3 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Business License Fee TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 IStreet Overlay Program 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 330,000 2 ISR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 45,000 3 IStrander By/SW 27th St Connect. 82,749 114,600 40,000 237,349 4 lRenton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5,000 5,0001 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 5 ITransit Program 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 122,400 6 1 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 8 Hardie Av SW TransiVMulti-modal 200,000 100,000 165,000 465,000 9 INE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 lWalkway Program 100,000 100,000 250,000 170,000 170,000 176,000 960,000 11 lRainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 149,900 154,000 20,000 323,900 12 IS Lake Wash. Roadway Improv. 13 ISouth Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 15 Project Development/Predesi n 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 16 NE 4th SUHoquiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 1,300,000 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 140,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 330,000 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 70,000 5,000 75,000 20 Loop Replacement Program 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 21 Sign Replacement Program 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 45,000 22 Pole Program 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 5,000 5,000 24 Traffic Safety Program 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 240,000 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 157,000 98,000 75,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 420,000 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 55,000 50,000 281,600 95,000 147,100 147,100 775,800 28 Duvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 30 TDM Program 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 31 Trans Concurrency 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 110,000 32 IMissing Links Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,0001 30,000 30,000 180,000 33 GIS Needs Assessment 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,0001 20,000 135,000 34 Grady Wy Corridor Study 20,000 80,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 160,000 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 20,000 18,000 18,000 20,000 80,000 80,000 236,000 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 12,000 12,000 38 Environmental Monitoring 20,000 25,000 17,500 12,500 25,000 25,000 125,000 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 65,000 41 1% for the Arts 60,0001 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 230,000 42 Arterial HOV Program 10,000 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 2,100 2,100 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 433",0300 45 SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR900197,251 197,251 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 2,500 47 SunseUDuvalllntersection 33,300 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 3,000 10,000 20,000 33,000 50 Houser W S -Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 2,400 2,400 52 Monster Road Bride 27,000 27,000 53 Duvall Ave NE - Kin County Total Sources 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 9,600,000 4-4 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Pronosed Fund Balance TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 250,000 250,000 2 SR 167/SW 27th SUStrander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 156,600 140,651 231,600 528,851 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Im rov. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 600,000 418,000 425,000 1,443,000 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 77,000 475,000 310,000 862,000 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 260,000 280,000 540,000 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Im rov. 13 South Renton Project 395,000 75,000 470,000 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Develo ment/Predesi n 16 NE 4th St/Ho uiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 80,000 10,000 90,000 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 50,000 710,000 760,000 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 421,200 126,726 547,926 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrent 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Stud 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1 % for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 45 SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR900 296,156 296,156 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources 1,352,800 1,608,533 280,000 908,600 893,000 745,000 5,787,913 R,pe Fu BaWc� oem+coos a+o 4-5 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Grants In -Hand TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 969,400 1,526,600 2,000,000 4,496,000 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5 Transit Program 6 lRainierAv Corridor Study/ Improv. 7 1 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 8 1 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 9 INE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 lWalkway Program 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 522,600 771,000 600,000 116,400 2,010,000 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Im rov. 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Develo ment/Predesi n 16 NE 4th SUHo uiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement __i0_'Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 14 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike 8, Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 1,967,600 70,274 2,037,874 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrenc 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Stud 35 IBicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 40,000 38,425 78,425 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1 % for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 45 ISR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 1,655,400 1,318,593 2,973,993 46 113enson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources 5,165,000 3,724,8921 600,0001 2,116,4001 11,596,292 4-6 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Mitinatinn In -Hand TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 10,000 10,000 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 100,000 160,000 260,000 4 Renton Urban Shuttle RUSH 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 497,000 425,000 525,000 1,447,000 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 795,000 870,000 1,665,000 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 224,000 179,500 178,000 581,500 10 Walkway Program 150,000 150,000 300,000 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 198,500 100,000 100,000 398,500 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improv. 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 30,000 30,000 15 Project Development/Predesi n 16 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 227,800 227,800 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 185,000 155,000 58,400 135,0001 32,900 32,900 599,200 28 Duvall Ave NE 86,000 250,000 336,000 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrent 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Study 35,000 100,000 135,000 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 44,500 103,175 147,675 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 55,000 25,000 12,500 17,500 5,000 5,000 120,000 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program. 41 1% for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 50,000 387,900 437,900 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 5,000 5,000 45 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 100,000 268,000 368,000 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources 1,400,800 1,718,575 348,900 749,500 1,417,900 1,432,900 7,068,575 mkwtion mi OBIOtf1006 a-t0 4-7 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Bonds / L.I.D.'s Formed * TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 IStreet overlay Program 2 ISR 167/SW 27th SUStrander By 3 1 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 3,000,000 3,000,000 4 Renton Urban Shuttle RUSH 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 WalkwayPro ram 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Im rov. 12,507,000 3,432,000 15,939,000 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Development/Predesi n 16 NE 4th SVHoquiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access '14 Traffic Safety Program 15 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrent 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Stud 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1% for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 45 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 IDuvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources 15,507,000 3,432,000 1 18,939,000 wwtiba fwmW 4-8 DRAFT Bonding in process; no L.I.D.s formed. Od08�iW5 130 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP nthPr-in-Hand TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR 167/SW 27th SUStrander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect 2,243,000 257,000 2,500,000 4 Renton Urban Shuttle RUSH 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Im rov. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 9 NE 3rdINE 4th Corridor 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Im rov. 5,000,000 5,000,000 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Develo ment/Predesi n 16 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Pod. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 49,200 49,200 49,200 49,200 49,200 49,200 295,200 31 Trans Concurrent 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Stud 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1 % for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 45 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 2,500,000 2,500,000 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County 3,169,190 524,000 3,693,190 Total Sources 10,461,390 573,200 2,549,200 306,200 49,2001 49,200 13,988,390 4-9 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Grants Proposed TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR 167/SW 27th SVStrander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 1,254,000 1,254,000 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5 ITransit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improv. 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Dove lopmenVPredesi 9 n 16 NE 4th SVHoquiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 13 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access t Traffic Safety Program -5 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrent 32 IMIssing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Stud 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1% for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 630,000 200,000 830,000 45 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Lo an Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources 1,884,000 200,000 2,084,000 Od01/3fM5 6:10 4-10 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Mitiaation Proposed TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improv. 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Development/Predesi n 16 NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrenc 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Stud 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1% for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16thSW43rd 45 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources M'RpMion PropoW ObO1IZ005 6:10 4 -11 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP L.I.D.'s Proposed TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Improv. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Im rov. 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Develo ment/Predesi n 16 NE 4th SUHo uiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrent 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 -drady Wy Corridor Stud 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1% for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 45 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources oero+noos s,o 4-12 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Other Pronosed TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 4,000,000 4,000,000 4 Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Im rov. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 3,000,000 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 2,300,000 4,700,000 5,000,000 12,000,000 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 10 Walkway Program 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improv. 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Development/Predesi n 16 NE 4th SUHoquiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 Duvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrent 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Stud 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1% for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 45 SR 169 HOV - 140th to SR900 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 49 Carr/Mill Signal 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 480,000 480,000 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County Total Sources 7,780,000 5,700,000 6,000,000 19,480,000 _012 6:10 4 -13 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Undetermined TIP Project Title 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Period Total 1 Street Overlay Program 2 SR 167/SW 27th St/Strander By 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 26,216,800 5,308,000 31,524,800 4 Renton Urban Shuttle RUSH 5 Transit Program 6 Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Im rov. 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 8 Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 5,017,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 11,617,000 10 Walkway Program 80,000 80,000 80,000 240,000 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 2,998,600 2,998,600 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Improv. 16,950,000 16,950,000 13 South Renton Project 14 1-405 Improvements in Renton 15 Project Development/Predesi n 16 NE 4th St/Ho uiam Av NE 17 Arterial Circulation Program 18 Bridge Inspection & Repair 19 May Creek Bridge Replacement 20 Loop Replacement Program 21 Sign Replacement Program 22 Pole Program 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 24 Traffic Safety Program 25 Traffic Efficiency Program 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 27 Arterial Rehab. Pro . 28 IDuvall Ave NE 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 30 TDM Program 31 Trans Concurrent 32 Missing Links Program 33 GIS Needs Assessment 34 Grady Wy Corridor Study 210,000 1,790,000 1,000,000 3,000,000 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 90,000 90,000 36 Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 38 Environmental Monitoring 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 41 1% for the Arts 42 Arterial HOV Program 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 44 Lind Av - SW 16th-SW43rd 1,284,000 426,000 1,710,000 45 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 46 Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 48 Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 460,000 460,000 49 Carr/Mill Signal 340,000 400,000 10,000 750,000 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 330,000 330,060 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 52 Monster Road Bridge 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County F77FTotal Sources 37,026,400 28,254,000 4,390,000 1 69.670.400 w�ww_am oarovtoos e.�o 4-14 DRAFT SECTION FIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS • Summary of TIP Projects & Costs 5-la • Detailed Project Descriptions 5-1 to 5-53 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING / BUILDING / PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006-2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Tnfni Prnianf rnctc TIP Project Title Previous Costs 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Six -Year Period Total Total Cost Total Funded Total Unfunded 1 Street Overlay Program 1,093,500 655,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 2,680,000 3,773,500 3,773,500 2 SR 167/SW 27th SUStrander By 358,596 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 55,000 413.596 413,596 3 Strander By/SW 27th St Connect. 2,491,727 6,369,000 1,750,000 34,174,006 5,748,000 48,041,000 50,532,727 13,753,927 36,778.800 a Renton Urban Shuttle RUSH 6,142 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 36,142 361142 5 Transit Program 32,359 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 122,400 154,759 154,759 s Rainier Av Corridor Study/ Im rov. 287,652 20,000 20.000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 407,652 407,652 7 Rainier Av - S 4th PI to S 2nd 10,000 2,197,000 1,943,000 2,160.000 6,300,000 6,310,000 3,310,000 3,000,000 a Hardie Av SW Transit/Multi-modal 190,000 2,577,000 6,070,000 6,500,000 15,147,000 15,337,000 3,337,000 12,000,000 9 NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor 212,147 314,000 394,500 413,000 5,017,000 3,300,600 3,300,000 12,738,500 12,950,647 1,333,647 11,617,000 10 Walkway Program 516,832 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 2,016,832 1,776,832 240,000 11 Rainier Av - SW 7th to 4th PI 323,454 871,000 1,285,000 1,000,000 3,360,000 20,000 6,536,000 6,859,454 3,860,854 2,998,600 12 S Lake Wash. Roadway Im rov. 2,050,773 17,507,000 3,432,000 16,950,000 37,889,000 39,939,773 22,989,773 16,950,000 13 South Renton Project 305,000 395,000 75,000 470,000 775,000 775,000 14 1-406 Improvements in Renton 72,271 30,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 90,000 162,271 162,271 15 Project Develoment/Predesi n 274,708 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 1,424,708 1,424,708 1s NE 4th St/Hoquiam Av NE 172,2001 227,800 227,800 400,000 400,000 17 Arterial Circulation Program 324,711 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 1,300,000 1,624,711 1,624,711 1e 1 Bridge Inspection & Repair 125,538 220,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 420,000 545,538 545,538 1s May Creek Bridge Replacement 120,000 710,000 5,000 835,000 835,000 835,000 20 Loop Replacement Program 33,807 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 153,807 153,807 21 Sign Replacement Program 9,358 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 45,000 54,358 54,358 22 Pole Program 44,200 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 194,200 194.200 23 Sound Transit HOV Direct Access 58,967 5,000 5,000 63,967 63,967 24 Traffic Safety Program 145,351 40,0001 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 240,000 385,351 385,351 25 ITraffic Efficiency Program 361,589 157,000 98,000 75,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 420,000 781,589 781,589 26 CBD Bike & Ped. Connections 74,956 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 374,956 374,956 27 Arterial Rehab. Pr . 388,916 240,000 205,000 340,000 230,000 180,000 180,000 1,375,000 1,763,916 1,763,916 29 Duvall Ave NE 1,381,419 2,474,800 447,000 2,921,800 4,303,219 4,303,219 29 RR Crossing Safety Pro . 5,182 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 35,182 35,182 30 TDM Program 118,805 64,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 64,200 385,200 504,005 504,005 31 Trans Concurrency 40,047 10,0001 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 110,000 150,047 150,047 32 Missing Links Program 56,886 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 236,886 236,886 33 GIS Needs Assessment 36,682 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 135,000 171,682 171,682 34 Grady Wy Corridor Study 20,619 35,000 120,000 80,000 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 3,295,000 3,315,619 315,619 3,000,000 35 Bicycle Route Dev. Program 34,342 20,000 18,000 18,000 110,000 80,000 80,000 326,000 360,342 270,342 90,000 3s Lake Wash. By -Park to Coulon Pk 317,418 84,500 141,600 226,100 543,518 543,518 37 Interagency Signal Coord. 19,572 12,000 12,000 31,572 31,572 3e Environmental Monitoring 184,838 75,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 245,000 429,838 429,838 39 Trans -Valley & Soos Creek Corr. 6,886 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 21,886 21,886 40 WSDOT Coordination Program 24,137 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 65,000 89,137 89,137 41 1% for the Arts 33,278 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 230,000 263,278 263,278 42 Arterial HOV Program 127,354 10,000 10,000 137,354 137,354 43 Park -Sunset Corridor 26,277 50,000 390,000 440,000 466,277 466,277 44 Lind Av - SW 16thSW43rd 5,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 2,545,000 2,550,000 10,000 2,540,000 45 SR 169 HOV -140th to SR900 2,015,391 1,755,400 2,080,000 2,500,000 6,335,400 8,350,791 8,350,791 as Benson Rd - S 26th to Main 222,963 2,500 2,500 225,463 225,463 47 Sunset/DuvallIntersection 909,561 33,300 33,300 942,861 942,861 4a Logan Av Concrete Panel Repair 460,000 460,000 460,000 460,000 49 Carr/Mill Signal 2,000 3,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,060 10,000 783,000 785,000 35,000 750,000 50 Houser Wy S - Main to Burnett 810,000 810,000 810,000 810,000 51 Lake Wash. By Slip Plane 637,600 2,400 2,400 640,000 640,000 52 Monster Road Bride 671,934 27,0001 27,000 698,934 698,934 53 Duvall Ave NE - King County 810,174 3,169,1901 524,000 3,693,190 4,503,364 4,503,364 Total Cources 17,673,1181 36,916,9901 13 222 200 5 963 100 62,966,1001 38,724,100114,832,1001161 624 590 179,297,708188 063 308 '1 234 400 TOM Pr .Ca o&Wam ).OB n4 5-1 AFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Street Overlay Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12108 Type: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 1 CONTACT: Bill Wressell 425.430.7400 DESCRIPTION: Annual program for repairing and resurfacing existing roadways, operating the City's Pavement Management System and providing data for deficiency ratings. JUSTIFICATION: ACP overlay, SMA, and slurry seal of streets provide for improved driving surface and are highly cost effective ways of avoiding expensive repairs and reconstruction. The computerized Pavement Management System and yearly survey of roadway conditions greatly improve the efficiency of the Overlay Program. The arterial streets are rated in odd years (2005, 2007, etc.) and all other streets are rated in even years (2006, 2008, etc.). STATUS: Ongoing yearly program. This program funds overlays on neighborhood streets and collector streets. The Arterial Rehabilitation Program funds major and minor arterials. CHANGES: 2005 funding was increased $300,000 to cover the cost of major patching needed in the Victoria Park Neighborhood and the increased oil costs. The funding for 2006 was increased $250,000. The oil costs and OCI will be monitored for future spending needs. Funded : 13,773,500 1 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 8,076 8 076 Precon En /Admin 70,667 667 10,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 3,371,757 339,757 652 000 2,380,000 605,000 355,000 355,000 355,000 355,000 355,000 Construction En /Admin 323,000 40,000 43,000 240,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 3,773,500 388,500 705,000 2,680,000 655,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 2,803,500 353,500 350,000 21100,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 Business License Fee 415,480 30,480 55,000 330,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 Proposed Fund Balance 550,000 300,000 250,000 250,000 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Dev. Reimb. 4,520 4,520 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 3,773,5001 388,500 705,0001 2,680,000 655,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405,000 405 000 WNroY NNNNNMNNYRNYINNNNNNOWN 6:10AM 5-1 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP SR 167 I/C / SW 27th St / Strander By Corridor Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: MinorArterial Proj. Length: RANK: 2 Fund: 317 Proj: 12138 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: Planning, coordination and oversight of the corridor project for the entire length. This includes arterial HOV lanes on SW 27th Street from East Valley Rd. to Oakesdale Av. SW and the extension to West Valley Hwy. (SR-181), as well as the coordination with WSDOT for a new interchange at SR-167 and SW 27th Street. JUSTIFICATION: There are numerous projects within the Renton Valley, led by a number of different agencies. This project provides the necessary coordination to ensure future transportation needs within the Renton Valley are served by the SW 27th St corridor in coordination with: King County Carr Rd project, King County TransValley project, Sound Transit rail station and ST Express transit service, King County Metro transit, and WSDOT 1-405 and SR-167 improvements. STATUS: The design of Segments 1 and 2 were shifted to a new project in 2003. The City of Tukwila transit oriented development (TOD) project adjacent to the SW 27th St / Strander Blvd. Corridor is still planned. CHANGES: Funded : 1413,596 lUnfunded Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 402,376 342,376 5,000 55,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 Precon En /Admin 11,220 11,220 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 413,596 353,596 5,000 55,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 48,684 3,684 45,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand 293,794 293,794 Mitigation In -Hand 71,118 56,118 5,000 10,000 10,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 413,5961 353,596 5,0001 55,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000, 10,000, 5,000 5tra tl. osro,rzoos 6 10 AM 5-2 DRAFT CITY OF, -_ _TON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2008 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Strander Boulevard / SW 27th Street Connection Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj. Length: 1.27 miles Proj: 12239 Type: 4 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 3 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: This project provides a critical four/five lane arterial that will serve as a connector to West Valley Highway (SR-181) and East Valley Road, as well as an arterial connector to SR-167 from the south. The project will provide a grade -separated crossing at the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Burlington Northern Sante Fe (BNSF) railroad tracks. Segments 1 and 2 include from West Valley Hwy to East Valley Road. JUSTIFICATION: A new east -west arterial roadway will connect the Cities of Renton and Tukwila, and provide significant congestion relief to existing arterials. The new road will provide direct access to the new Tukwila Station, a multi -modal center being developed immediately north of the new alignment, and to the Boeing Longacres site. The eventual direct HOV connections to southbound SR-167 will provide significant advantages to HOV and transit usage. By crossing under the UPRR and BNSF railroads, the new arterial will provide significant benefits to both freight mobility and to general motorists. STATUS: Up to 30% design was contracted in March 2003 for $2,213,349. It includes the environmental documents, base -mapping, road sections, and project phasing by June 2005. $1,000,000 was received from the General Fund in 2003. $745,563 TEA-21 was obligated in May 2003 with an additional $2,398 obligated in May 2005. The design and construction costs reflect Phases 1 and 2 CHANGES: *The City is in the process of applying for bonds. Nearing completion of 30% design for all phases. Engineering estimates are lower than the planning level estimates. Phase 1, Segment 1, is in full design with construction to start late 2005, early 2006 paid for with approximately $3 million in bonds. A shared -use detention pond with the developer will lower the costs of construction. $500,000 Metro mitigation reserve is pending Council approval. New fuel tax 2010. Funded:Funded:l 13 753 927 Unfunded-:1 36,778,800 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 6,199,727 1,471,727 1,020,000 3,708,000 850,000 2,350,000 508,000 R-O-W includes Admin 4,543,000 4,543,000 21243,000 2,300,000 Construction Contract Fee 35,900,000 35,900 000 2,970,000 1,570,000 26 760,000 41600,000 Construction En /Admin 3,890,000 31890,000 306,000 180,000 1 2,764,000 640,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 50,532,727 1,471,727 1,020,000 48,041,000 6,369,000 1,750,000 34,174,000 5,748,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 240,000 240,000 240,000 Business License Fee 237,349 237,349 82,749 114,600 40,000 Proposed Fund Bal./Reserve 772,617 243,766 528,851 156,600 140,651 231,600 Grants In -Hand State & Fed 5,243,961 554,799 193,162 4,496,000 969,400 1,526,600 2,000,000 Mitigation In -Hand 760,000 500,000 260,000 100,000 160,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed 3,000,000 3,000,000 3000000 Other In -Hand GF & Boeing) 3,500,000 416,928 583,072 2,500,000 2,243,000 257,000 Grants Proposed Earmarks 1,254,000 11254,000 1,254,000 Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed (S.Transit) 4,000,000 4,000 000 4,000,000 Undetermined 31,524,8001 31 524,800 26,216,8001 5,308,000 TOTAL SOURCES 1 50,532,7271 1,471,7271 1,020,0001 48,041,000 1 6,369,0001 1,750,0001 34,174,0001 5,748,0001 Str�nWr Corwcnon o5N111om $-10AM 5-3 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) Program Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 4 Fund: 317 Proj: 12163 CONTACT: Nathan .tones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: The Renton Urban Shuttle (RUSH) is a shuttle bus service provided by King County Metro that runs peak hours between Longacres Multi -modal Commuter Station (where the Sounder train arrives mornings and evenings) and North Renton (Boeing). The City intends to work with Metro and transit consultants to develop this service into a program that delivers greater benefits to Renton area residents and employees. JUSTIFICATION: Congestion relief, increased travel options and economic development are outcomes dependent upon increasing transit patronage in Renton. The RUSH shuttle compliments existing transit service by providing additional local service. STATUS: In 2001, Metro assumed full fiscal responsibility for the existing shuttle service. CHANGES: ]Funded: 136,142 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 36,142 1,142 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5 000 5,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other RUSH Contract TOTAL EXPENSES 36,142 1,142 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 36,142 1,142 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I. D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 36,1421 1,142, 5,000, 30 000 5 000 5,000 5,000, 5,000 5 000 5,0001 sh.o. �1=5 610AM 5-4 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Transit Program Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: N/A Fund: Proj. Length: N/A Proj: RANK: 5 CONTACT: Nathan Jones 317 12109 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: Determine and provide funding for short-range and long-range transit needs, routes, and facilities, including park and ride lots, bus shelters, and arterial system improvements required to facilitate transit access. Joint projects with King County Metro and Sound Transit will also be pursued to improve local and regional transit service in Renton. Work with transit agencies, community, and businesses for implementation. JUSTIFICATION: Transit improvements are a vital component of the transportation system's ability to absorb future traffic demand and meet Level -of -Service standards. The City and private developers have invested millions of dollars in capital improvements in support of transit -oriented development and services. Transit will be one key in meeting the goals of the downtown area as well as development in other parts of the City. Coordination with Metro and Sound Transit projects and programs will help leverage these funds and increase benefits to Renton. STATUS: Staff continue to attend regional coordination meetings with transit agencies. Will monitor service and capital facility improvements within Renton, and will pursue and advocate for better -timed arrivals and departures at our major transit facilities. CHANGES: Funded : 1154,759 lUnfunded Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent In 2004 2006 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 154,759 11,959 20,400 122,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20 400 20,400 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other (Contingency) TOTAL EXPENSES 154,759 11,959 20,400 122,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 154,759 11,959 20,400 122,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed FTA Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 154,7591 11,959 20 400 122,400 r 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20,400 20 400 Tr.w aemirm 6:10AM 5.5 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Rainier Ave Corridor Study and Improvements Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12193 Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM RANK: 6 CONTACT: Nathan Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: Pre -engineering study to evaluate short-term and long-term traffic flow and safety improvements in this corridor. Included will be potential for adding HOV lanes, signing and intersection improvements, and access control/consolidation of driveways. JUSTIFICATION: This is a critical corridor serving the central Renton area with existing operational problems and it is projected to experience severe congestion in the future. Potential improvements include those that will offer benefits to transit - increased speed, reliability, and ridership - as well as HOV and general purpose traffic safety improvements. STATUS: Upon completion of the study, anticipated by the end of 2005, staff will prepare a report for Council review and adoption. CHANGES: Two new projects originating from this study have been split off: 1) Hardie Ave. SW Transit / Mulitmodal Improvements and 2) Rainier Ave. Improvements - S 4th PI to S 2nd St. Funded : 1407,652 lUnfunded Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six -Year Pro ram ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 407,652 204,552 83,100 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 407,652 204,552 83,100 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 276,552 136,552 20,000 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance 63,100 63,100 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 68,000 68,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I. D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SUM= 407,6521 204,552 83,1001 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 R.44. 0&0112005 6:10 AM 5-6 DRAFT CITY OF 1. 4TON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Rainier Ave. Improvements - S 4th PI to S 2nd St Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: Principal & Minor Fund: 317 Proj. Length: 0.4 miles Proj: 12501 RANK: 7 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430,7223 DESCRIPTION: Rebuild sidewalks including curb and gutters; add pedestrian -scale illumination, bollards (at crossings), transit facility improvements (shelters, benches, info kiosks), planted buffer strips and landscaped medians, and eastbound transit cue jump at S 3rd St. JUSTIFICATION: Rainier Ave. is a critical corridor in central Renton with existing operational problems and in need of infrasructure enhancements to provide greater ease of non -motorized and transit -based travel. STATUS: Anticipated design contract to be authorized in mid- to late 2005. Sound Transit is the key funding partner. Funding shown in 2009-2011 will move to 2006-2008 pending MOU development with Sound Transit. CHANGES: New project. Approximately $10,000 is required in 2005 to evaluate design options; the funding will be reallocated from the NE 4th St/Hoquiam Ave. project by Council process. Funding shown 2009-2011 will likely be spread over 2006-2012 pending Sound Transit Board approval of funds. un a Unfunded , Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed. Sent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 607,000 10,000 597,000 597,000 R-O-W includes Admin 11600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 Construction Contract Fee 3,800,000 3,800,000 1,800,000 2,000,000 Construction En /Admin 303,000 303,000 143,000 160,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 6,310,000 10,000 6,300,000 2,197,000 1,943,000 2,160,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 110,000 110,000 110,000 Business License Fee 310,000 10,000 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Proposed Fund Balance 1,443,000 1,443,000 600,000 418,000 425,000 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 1,447 000 1,447,000 497,000 425,000 525,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed S. Transit 3,000,000 3,000,000 11000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 6,310,0001 1 10,0001 6,300,000 2,197,000 1 943 000 2,160,000 Rdrwr 67 OWlrW5 6:10AM 5-7 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION grins - gr111 SIX -YEAR TIP Hardie Ave. SW Transit / Multimodal Improvements Functional Classification: Principal & Minor Fund: 317 Proj. Length: 0.7 miles Proj: 12502 Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM RANK: 8 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430.7223 DESCRIPTION: Add Business Access Transit (BAT) lanes in both directions; rebuild the Hardie railroad bridge;add non- motorized facilities, i.e., multimodal trail, northbound transit -only signal at Rainier and Hardie, curb gutter sidewalks between Sunset Blvd. and Rainier Ave. S. JUSTIFICATION: Regional transit agencies have expressed a desire to partner with the City to design and build systematic transit improvements throughout Renton for the purposes of reducing travel times and improving speed and reliability for routes serving Renton. Additionally, there is a need for improved non -motorized facilities providing north to south connections. There are also safety benefits for all by replacing the substandard railroad bridge over Hardie south of SW 5th Pl. STATUS: Design contract authorization anticipated mid- to late 2005. Sound Transit is the key funding partner. Funding shown in 2009-2011 will move to 2006-2008 pending MOU development with Sound Transit. CHANGES: New project. Approximately $190,000 is required in 2005 to evaluate design options; the funding will be reallocated from the NE 4th St/Hoquiam Ave. project by Council process. Hardie Ave. SW will be changed from a Collector Arterial to a Minor Arterial. Funding shown 2009-2011 will likely be spread over 2006-2012 pending Sound Transit Board approval of funds. Funded:Fundedd 3,337,0001 Unfunded :1 12,000,000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 1,667 000 190,000 1,477,000 1,077,000 400,000 R-O-W includes Admin 21423,000 21423,000 1,500,000 923,000 Construction Contract Fee 10,413,000 10,413,000 1 4,413,000 6,000,000 Construction En /Admin 834,000 834,000 334,000 500,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 15,337,000 190,000 15,147,000 2,577,000 6,070,000 6,500,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 155,000 155,000 155,000 Business License Fee 465,000 465,000 200,000 100,000 165,000 Proposed Fund Balance 862,000 862,000 77,000 475,000 310,000 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 1,855,000 190,000 1,665,000 795,000 870,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed S. Transit 12,000,000 12,000,000 2,300,000 4 700 000 5,000,000 Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 15,337,0001 190,000, 15,147,000 2,577,0001 6,070,0001 6,500,000 H.dw 5-8 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 9nnA - 9(111 SIX-YFAR TIP NE 3rd/NE 4th Corridor Improvements Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12176 RANK: 9 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: This project involves a series of key improvements in this corridor to improve traffic operations such as rechannelization and traffic signal modifications, possible construction of an eastbound hill -climbing lane from Monterey Ave to east of Edmonds Ave, possible transit priority signal treatments and possibly queue jumps. This project will seek to meet pedestrain, transit and bicycle needs. JUSTIFICATION: This corridor has a strong potential for transit usage and is experiencing rapid residential and retail growth. STATUS: The NE 3rd/4th Corridor Study was initiated in 2001 and completed in 2004. The study refined the corridor transportation needs and costs, including pedestrian, transit users, bicyclists, as well as streetscape enhancement. Costs shown reflect estimates from the study. CHANGES: The final report was presented to Council for adoption May 2005. Projects will be identified to go to design and construction pending funding. A likely candidate is the south approach at the NE 4th St and Duvall Ave NE intersection. The project would include widening the approach to three lanes including a left -turn lane, and signal modification. New fuel tax funding is shown for this corridor 2006-2008. Funded : 11,333,647 lUnfunded : 111,617,000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 200,740 199,440 1,300 Precon En /Admin 11297,907 2,707 8 700 11286,500 100,000 38,500 488,000 330,000 330,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 10,630,500 10 630,500 192,500 344,000 400,000 4,194,000 2,750,000 2,750,000 Construction En /Admin 821,500 821,500 21,500 12,000 13,000 335,000 220,000 220,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 12,950,647 202,147 10,000 12,738,500 314,000 394,500 413,000 5,017,000 3,300,000 3,300,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 540,000 540,000 90,000 215,000 235,000 Business License Fee 27,147 27,147 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 766,500 175,000 10,000 581,500 224,000 179,500 178,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 1 11,617,0001 11 617,000 1 1 5,017,000 3 300 000 3,300,000 TOTAL SOORCESI 12,950,6471 202147 10,0001 12,738,500 1 314,0001 394,500 413,000 5 017 000 3:300:0001 3,300,0001 NEffiC_NEft o6/0it= 610 AM 5-9 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION gnnR - gn11 SIX-YFAR TIP Walkway Program Type: 3 -COMMUNITY LIVABILITY / ENHANCEMENT Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 9 RANK: 10 CONTACT: Dan Hasty 425.430.7246 DESCRIPTION: This program provides for the design and construction of high priority non -motorized transportation facilities for pedestrians. Projects will be identified and prioritized in the upcoming Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study and through coordination with the City's Neighborhood Program. JUSTIFICATION: Providing safe and convenient non -motorized facilities is an integral part of a complete transportation network. Specific improvements will respond to the needs of school children, the aged and persons with disabilities, and will support increased use of transit. STATUS: The Comprehensive Citywide Walkway Study, completed in May 2003, is being used to select some of the projects that will move into the design and construction phases. Council -approval of $166,000 in Metro mitigation funds is split between 2004 and 2005. CHANGES: Funding shown in 2005 will be used to construct the Highlands and Maplewood Glen Sidewalk Replacement Project. This construction will be combined with the Benson Road Pedestrian TIB grant project under one construction contract. Funding has been separated for the purposes of the grant. Funded : 11,776,832 lUnfunded : 240 000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 44,932 8 332 6,600 30,000 5 000 5,000 5 000 5,000 5 000 5,000 Precon En /Admin 203,400 53,400 150,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25 000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 1,632,500 8,500 406 000 1,218,000 203,000 203,0001 203,000 203,0001 203,000 203,000 Construction En /Admin 136,000 34,000 102,000 17,000 17,0001 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 2,016,832 16,832 500,000 1,500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 1,060,000 100,000 960,000 100,000 100,000 250,000 170,000 170,0001 170,000 Proposed Fund Balance 180,232 180,232 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 370,600 70 600 300,000 150,000 150,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand KC Metro Mit 166,000 16,832 149,168 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 240,0001 240,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 TOTAL SOURCESF 2,016,8321 500,0001 1,500,000 250,000 250,000 250,0001 250,0001 250,000. 250,000 W.Ik-y 06/01l1005 B:tOA 5-10 DRAFT CITY OF r-ATON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2nn6 - 2n11 SIX -YEAR TIP Rainier Avenue - SW 7th St to S 4th PI Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Fund: 317 Proj. Length: o.3 miles Proj: 12308 Type: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 11 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: Improvements complete a missing link, remove barriers, eliminate sub -standard conditions, control and consolidate access points to existing major businesses, and provide an enhanced pedestrian environment. Project elements include adding a third NB through -lane, adding a left -turn lane, removing the BNSF railroad bridge support pier, lowering the roadway to provide standard clearance under the bridge, and widening sidewalks to 10 feet with streetscaping. JUSTIFICATION: Existing high level of traffic congestion and accidents. Bottleneck including reduction of lanes from three to two at S 7th St and the BNSF bridge and support pier just south of S 4th PI. The improvements will enhance traffic flow and reduce accidents. They will provide a missing link on Rainier Ave. with one additional northbound (NB) lane. STATUS: Design consultant has been selected. Design will continue through September 2006 and go to ad for construction soon after. Received a TIB Transportation Partnership Program (TPP) grant award of $2.2 million in November 2003. $300,000 of mitigation funds must be dedicated to this project to fulfill the grant requirements. CHANGES: Total estimated project costs have increased from the original planning level cost estimate. Bridge replacement costs is one of the largest contributing factors to the increase in the budget; steel prices have increased. New fuel tax funding is shown in years 2009 and 2010. Funded:Fundedd 3,860,8541 Unfunded :1 2,998,600 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2006 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 773,454 3,454 320,000 450,000 450,000 R-O-W includes Admin 206,000 206,000 206,000 Construction Contract Fee 4,972,000 4,972,000 200,000 1,063,000 832,000 2,877,000 Construction En/Admin. 408,000 408,000 15,000 87,000 68,000 218,000 20 000 Other 500,000 500,000 135,000 100,000 265,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 6,859,454 3,454 320,000 6,536,000 871,000 1,285,000 1,000,000 3,360,000 20,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 265,000 265,000 245,000 20,000 Business License Fee 323,900 323,900 149,900 154,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance 540,000 540,000 260,000 280,000 Grants In -Hand 2,202,000 192,000 2,010,000 522,6001 771,000 600,000 116,400 Mitigation In -Hand 529,954 3,454 128,000 398,500 198,500 100,000 100,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 2,998,600 2,998,600 2,998,600 TOTAL SOURCES 1 6,859,4541 3,454 320,0001 6,536,000 871,0001 1,285,000 1,000,000 3 360 000 20,000, R.-AR Bft owuirlom E 10" 5-11 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP South Lake Washington Roadway Improvements - Districts 1 & 2 Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12306 Type: 4 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RANK: 12 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: The project will construct the needed roadway improvements in the South Lake Washington area to support future redevelopment plans. New roads and intersections will be built and existing roadways will be widened/extended to provide adequate future traffic flows. Redevelopment is phased into 2 districts, each having their own needed roadway improvements. Roadways included in the project are Logan, Park, and Garden Avenues, and 6th, 8th, and 10th Streets. JUSTIFICATION: Key project fro the redevelopment of Boeing's north Renton site. The partnership between the City and Boeing aspires to draw private interest in an area to be redeveloped from the aerospace company's use to commercial/retail use. A tight deadline has been outlined in the agreement that entails the needed roadway improvements and the new stormwater, sewer, and water utilities required to accomodate the shift in land use. STATUS: Consultant contract awarded in 2004 to complete 30% design for roadway improvements needed to support District 1. The consultant was awarded a contract to complete final design of District 1 in 2005 for $927,330 to be completed by Feb. 2006. City Council allocated $1.5 million from the General Fund in 2004. Transportation funds expended from Fund 317 will be reimbursed. CHANGES: * The City is in the process of applying for bonds to fund this project. Costs reflect roadway improvements to include road and stormwater, as well as sanitary sewer and water improvements. $5 million is expected from the State legislature as shown in 2006. uneUnfunded , Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 3,342 773 950,773 1,100,000 1,292 000 292,000 1,000,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 33,270 000 33,270 000 15,650 000 31120,000 14,500,000 Construction En /Admin 3,327,000 3,327,000 1,565,000 312,000 1,450,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 39,939,773 950,773 1,100,000 37,889,000 17,507,000 3,432,000 16,950,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds*/L.I.D.'s Formed 16,489,773 550,773 15,939,000 12,507 000 3,432,000 Other In -Hand GF and State 6,500,000 950.773 549,227 5,000 000 5,000 000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 16 950,000 16.950.000 16,950,000 TOTAL SOURCES 1 39 939,7731 950,773 1,100,0001 37,889,000 17,507,000 3,432,000 16,950,0001 5 L.WA `mprov. 06N9r2ox 1:03 PM 5-12 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX YEAR TIP (South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood Street Improvements 1-INFRASTRUCTURE ESCRIPTION: rovide improvements and asphalt overlay in the South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood to include e S Burnett Av/S 4th intersection. Asphalt overlay Shattuck Av S from SW 7th St to Houser Wy S, 0uth 6th St from Burnett Av S to Shattuck Av S, SW 7th St from Shattuck Av S to Rainier Av S, 0uth 5th St from Burnett Av S to Smithers Av S. (JUSTIFICATION: Deteriorating streets. New 2006 projects provide sidewalks and access to Burnett Linear Park Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12194 RANK: 13 CONTACT: Ryan Plut 425.430.7372 STATUS: Traffic improvements in the South Renton Burnett Park Neighborhood expected to go to ad in June 2005. King County Metro mitigation funds of $175,000 were assigned to as follows: $40,000 for design of improvements for Burnett/S 4th intersection; $60,000 reserved for Burnett/S 4th intersection construction with Council concur; $75,000 for South Renton street overlay projects. CHANGES: Intersection design of 4th & Burnett complete; construct improvements in 2005 pending funding available. Need Council approval of $60,000 remaining Metro mitigation funds and $210,000 reserve funds from South Renton Reserves. Remaining overlay streets to be added to the 2007 overlay project list. New 2006 projects: 5th & Burnett, 6th & Burnett, and mid -block between 5th and 6th pending addition of $390,000 reserve funds. Project Totals I Programmed Pre-2006 g Six -Year Program ITEM IlProgrammed I Spent Pre-2005 1 2005 1 Total 1 2006 2007 1 2008 T 2009 1 201-0---F 2011 ax n-Ha rm Zi 3 S R� Bohol pypt2005 0:10.m 5-13 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION gnnA - gn11 SIX-YFAR TIP 1-405 Improvements in Renton T e: 4 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12210 RANK: 14 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: Conceptual planning process to evaluate performance of existing and future freeway and interchange facilities along 1-405. Construction impacts to local streets will also be evaluated. JUSTIFICATION: The intent of this planning study is to coordinate proposed improvements to 1-405 by WSDOT with the City interests. STATUS: Programmed funds will be utilized for staff time and potential consultant cost. The South Renton Nickel project Environmental Assessment has been initiated by WSDOT. Construction is scheduled to begin in late 2007. The South Renton Nickel project budget is $136 million. CHANGES: The program budget was extended to 2011. Washington State Legislature passed a 9.5 cent gas tax increase, signed into law in May 2005 as the Transportation Partnership Act (TPA). The TPA budget for South Renton is $180 million. The TPA also has budget for I- 405 improvements north of the N 44th St. interchange. Funded:Funded:1 162,2711 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 162,271 42,271 30 000 90,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 162,271 42,271 30,000 90,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 132,271 42,271 30,000 60,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10 000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 30,000 30,000 30,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 162,271, 42,271, 30,0001 90,000 1 30,000. 20,000 10,000 10,000, 10,000, 10,0001 1405 Imp oeo,rmos 5-14 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX-YFAR TIP Project Development & Pre -Design Program Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 15 Fund: 317 Proj: 12150 CONTACT: Sharon Griffin 425.430.7232 DESCRIPTION: Perform critical activities needed for the development of future CIP projects and for grant applications, including scoping, cost estimates, pre -design, interlocal agreements and deficiency analysis. Also provides for the monitoring of active grant projects for compliance with State and Federal laws, regulations and specifications. JUSTIFICATION: Analysis of existing and projected transportation operation problems, infrastructure maintenance needs, local and regional mobility goals and revenues/costs is vital to the development of transportation projects that will be buildable, financable, best serve the needs of Renton and compete well for grants. Also to maintain eligibility for grant funding, the City must assure that project specifications and management comply with current State and Federal standards. STATUS: Ongoing yearly program. CHANGES: In 2004, this program began including more staff time reimbursement to the General Fund. Funded : 11,424,708 lUnfunded Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 1,089,708 99,708 130,000 860,000 130,000 130,000 150,000 150,000 150 000 150,000 Precon En /Admin 335,000 45,000 290,000 45,000 45,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 1,424,708 99,708 175,000 1,150,000 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 1,424 708 99,708 175,000 1,150 000 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Pro osed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 1,424,7081 99,7081 175,0001 1,150,000 175,000, 175,0001 200,000 200,0001 200,0001 200,0001 P,.� o owlr2oos 8:10AM 5-15 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Type: 5 -OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: tzzos RANK: 16 CONTACT: Leslie Lahndt 425.430.7223 DESCRIPTION: Install new fully actuated traffic signal, including poles, signal and pedestrian displays, detection loops, emergency pre-emption, a new signal controller, interconnect to master computer and associated channelization. Right-of-way needs are unknown at this time. JUSTIFICATION: Increasing vehicular and pedestrian traffic in this area is warranting a traffic signal based on safety and delays. STATUS: Design should be completed in Summer 2005 pending coordination with developers on south side. CHANGES: Construction may proceed with development in 2006. $200,000 of the 2005 allocation was split between two new 2005 projects: 1) Hardie Ave. SW Transit and 2) Rainier Ave. Improvements; it is shown as reallocated to 2006 for this project. Funded: 400,0001 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 42,000 27,267 14,733 R-O-W includes Admin 50,000 50,000 Construction Contract Fee 280,000 72,200 207,800 207,800 Construction En /Admin 28,000 8,000 20,000 20,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 400,000 27,267 144,933 227,800 227,800 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 10,000 267 9,733 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 390,000 27,000 135,200 227,800 227,800 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.LD.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 400,0001 27,267 144,9331 227,800 227,800 NE 4th Street/Hoquiam Avenue NE Functional Classification: N/A NE{1N SVHOW Av O&OV-1005 6:10 AM 5-16 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Arterial Circulation Program Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 17 Fund: 317 Proj: 29 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: This program provides for the long-range and short range planning and traffic analysis required to evaluate and update the Transportation Plan in relation to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, to assess the impacts of new development proposals and to recommend local and regional transportation system improvements for all modes of travel. Funding for hardware, software and employee hours required to operate the computer model is also included under this program. JUSTIFICATION: Combined State and Federal Clean Air legislation, the Growth Management Act, passage of the RTA plan and the increasing importance of making sure that local and regional transportation plans are coordinated to the benefit of Renton, make on -going, multi -modal planning a high priority need. STATUS: This project will fund the on -going planning work which will lead to refinement and/or adjustment of the of improvement projects on the arterial network identified in the Transportation Plan. CHANGES: Funded : 11,624,711 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed. Sent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 11624,711 124,711 200,000 11300,000 200,000 200,00 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 1,624,711 124,711 200,000 1,300,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 1,624,711 124,711 200,000 1,300,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 250,000 250,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1,624,7111 124,711 200,0001 1,300,000 200,OOOJ 200,000 200,000 200,0001 250,0001 250,000 5 -17 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 7rV1F _ 9n11 RIX-YEAR TIP Bridge Inspection & Repair Program T e: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE Functional Classification: N/A Fund: Proj. Length: N/A Proj: RANK: 18 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 317 106 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: Inspect all roadway bridges owned by the City every two years to determine bridge sufficiency and load ratings, seismic retrofit needs, undertake minor repairs, and preventative maintenance as needed. JUSTIFICATION: Inspection program must be done for safety and funding purposes and as part of WSBIS Program to determine structural deficiencies, physical deterioration, or functional obsolescence and to qualify for Federal bridge replacement grant funding. Repair funding is provided to accomplish improvements, identified through the inspection program, that will increase the safety and extend the longevity of the structures. STATUS: Biennial bridge inspections occur in 2007, 2009 and 2011. CHANGES: The Houser Way Bridge will be painted in 2006. The May Creek Bridge Project was split off into a separate project due to the aniticipated replacement in 2006/2007. The 2005 Monster Road Bridge repairs require an annual inspection frequency for the next three inspection cycles, resulting in higher annual expenditures. Funded : 1545.538 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 205,538 79,238 46,300 80,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 150,000 150,000 150,000 Construction En /Admin 10,000 10,000 10,000 Other 180,000 180,000 30,000. 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 545,538 79,238 46,300 420,000 220,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 449,238 79,238 40,000 330,000 140 000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 Proposed Fund Balance 96,300 6,300 90,000 80,000 10,000 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 545,5381 791.238 46,3001 420 000 220,0001 40,000, 40,000 40,0001 40,000140 000 BriEp�_Inp�cl 06101MC5 6:10 AM , 5-18 DRAFT CITY OF t-,-,4TON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP May Creek Bridge Replacement Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12503 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 19 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: Completely reomve the existing bridge structure and the timber piers within the waterway. Replace with a single span, concrete structure supported on concrete abutments. Adjust the alignments of both approaches to conform to the increase in bridge deck height. This replacement will require some right -of- way acquisition due to the adjustment of the alignment and the new bridge location. JUSTIFICATION: The existing structure is four feet below the 100-year flood water level standards set by WSDOT. The bridge deck is supported by a timber pier that is vulnerable to the weakening effect of rot and damage from debris flows. Failure of this pier would cause immediate collapse. The timber abutments are showing evidence of rot and deterioration. STATUS: The May Creek Bridge is scheduled for routine inspection in 2005. The findings will be used to apply for BRAC funding in 2005. WSDOT Bridge Preservation will determine eligibility for bridge replacement funding. CHANGES: New project. Split off from the Bridge Inspection and Repair Program. Funded:Funded:1 835,0001 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 130,000 130,000 120,000 10 000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin 650,000 650,000 650,000 Construction Contract Fee 55,000 55,000 50,000 5,000 Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 835,000 835,000 120,000 710,000 5,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 75,000 75,000 70,000 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance 760,000 760,000 50,000 710,000 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 835,000 835,000 120,000 710,000 5,000 May C—k owirlom 6:10AM 5-19 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 9nnA - g(111 SIX -YEAR TIP Traffic Signal Loop Replacement Program T e: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: Fund: 317 Proj: 16 20 CONTACT: Dave Whitmarsh 425.430,7423 DESCRIPTION: Replace failed or failing traffic signal vehicle detection loops and repair pavement as required to achieve proper installation and assure reliability. JUSTIFICATION: Most of Renton's signals require extensive vehicle detection systems to provide traffic count data needed for the intersection controllers and VMS signal coordination system to operate effectively. The detection loops in the pavement must be properly maintained; their failure results in highly inefficient operation. Pavement deterioriation due to heavy traffic volumes, trucks, and adverse weather have increased the need for replacement. STATUS: On -going yearly program. CHANGES: Funded : 1153,807 lUnfunded Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 135,807 1,807 32,000 102,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 Construction En /Admin 3,000 3,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 Other(City Force 15,000 15,000 2 500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 153,807 1,807 32,000 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 153,807 1,807 32,000 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,0001 20,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 153,80 1,807 32,0001 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000, 20,000 20,0001 20,0001 L.P. 06/0112m 6:10 AM 5 - 20 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Traffic Sign Replacement Program Type: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 21 CONTACT: Fund: 317 Proj: 12113 Dave Whitmarsh 425A30.7423 DESCRIPTION: This program provides for the replacement and/or relocation of signs that are obsolete, faded, poorly located or no longer appropriate. JUSTIFICATION: Poor signing can create safety problems and driver confusion. Purchase of these materials falls beyond normal maintenance budget. STATUS: On -going yearly program. Contract fee amount is for purchase of materials that will be assembled and installed by City. CHANGES: Funded : 154,358 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 35,000 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 5 000 5,0001 5,000 5,000 Construction En /Admin Other (CityForces 19,358 1,858 2,500 15,000 2 500 2 500 2 500 2,500 2,500 2,500 TOTAL EXPENSES 54,358 1,858 7,500 45,000 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 54,358 1,858 7,500 45,000 7,5001 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,5001 7,500 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 54,3581 1,858 7,5001 7 500 7 500 7 500 7 500 7 500 7 500 Sq. 06110irms 610AM 5-21 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 9nns - gni 1 SIX-YFAR TIP Pole Replacement Program Type: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 22 CONTACT: Fund: 317 Proj: 91 Dave Whitmarsh 425.430.7423 DESCRIPTION: This program is for the replacement of damaged luminaire and signal poles. These poles have been damaged in unknown incidents where reimbursement through normal channels is impossible. JUSTIFICATION: Pedestrian and vehicular safety is highly related to adequate signal displays and street lighting. Purchase of these poles falls beyond normal maintenance budget. Changing out a single pole costs $10,000 to $14,000. Damaged and rusting poles that loose galvanization degrade to the point of threatening their structural integrity. STATUS: On -going yearly program. Contract fee amount is for purchase and repair of poles. CHANGES: Funded : 1194,200 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 6,000 6,000 1,500 1 500 1,500 1,5001 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 159,000 25,000 134,000 25,000 25,0001 21,000 21,0001 21,000 21,000 Construction En /Admin Other 29,200 19,200 10,000 2,500 2 500 2,500 2 500 TOTAL EXPENSES 194,200 19,200 25,000 150,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 194,200 19,200 25,000 150,000 25,000 25,000 25 000 25,000. 25,000 25,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Miti ation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 194,2001 19,200 25,0001 150,000 1 25,000 25 000 25,000, 25,000 25 000 25,0001 vae O6q/2005 6'.tOA 5 - 22 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Sound Transit HOV Direct Access Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: Freeway Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 23 CONTACT: Fund: 317 Proj: 12171 Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: This program provides for coordination with and input into WSDOT and Sount Transit plan for the HOV Direct Access interchange and South Renton transit improvements. JUSTIFICATION: Direct access to 1-405 HOV lanes is an important element in increasing transit speed and ridership in Renton. STATUS: Funds are identified for coordination critical to ensuring Sound Transit (ST) improvements are consistent with City needs and desires. CHANGES: Funded : 163,967 lUnfunded Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 63,967 48,967 10,000 5,000 5,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 63,967 48,967 10,000 5,000 5,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 63,967 48,967 10,000 5,000 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCESI 63,9671 48,967 10,0001 5,000 1 5,0001 ST nOv 06/01120M 510 AM 5 - 23 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 9008 - 9011 SIX -YEAR TIP Miscellaneous Traffic Safety Program Type: 5 -OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12115 RANK: 24 CONTACT: Karl Hamilton 425.430.7220 DESCRIPTION: This ongoing yearly program provides for special small-scale traffic safety improvements that are identified and require materials, labor or equipment beyond the normal scope of City operations and maintenance crews. JUSTIFICATION: Historically, this level of traffic safety improvements are required on an annual basis. This program budgets for safety projects to address these needs. Projects are typically identified through citizen concerns, analysis of accident records or observation by City Traffic Operations and Maintenance personnel. Traffic Operations Section identify and prioritize locations. STATUS: Some funds may be used to match potential Hazard Elimination & Safety (HES) grants. All stages of the Signal Pre-empt Program (upgrading the systems to prevent unauthorized pre emption of the signal system) will be completed in 2005. CHANGES: The final stage of the Pre-empt Program will be completed in 2005. Two new programs: 1) LED Replacement Program will replace signal indicators at ten intersections per year (all years), and 2) UPS Program will install uninterruptable power supply (UPS) at two critical intersections per year (all years). Funded : 1385,351 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 27,000 27,000 4 500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 195,000 195,000 32,500 32,500 32,500 32,500 32,500 32,500 Construction En /Admin 18,000 18,000 3,000 3 000 3,000 3,000 3 000 3,000 Other 145,351 105,351 40,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 385,351 105,351 40,000 240,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 385,351 105,351 40,000 240 000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL S5URCES1 385,3511 105,3511 40,0001 240,000 40,000 40 00 440 000 40,000, 40,0001 40,000 sa oeo,rr.,os ,o 5-24 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Traffic Systems Efficiency Improvements Program Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12162 Type: 5 - OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 25 CONTACT: Karl Hamilton 425,430.7220 DESCRIPTION: Provides for improvements to the operational efficiency of the existing roadway system, including such items as development and implementation of signal coordination programs, signing and channelization improvements, surveillance control and driver information system (SC & DI), transit signal priority, Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems (IVHS), signal improvements such as protective / permissive phasing, and matching funds for possible grants to upgrade the Central traffic control system. JUSTIFICATION: Improving the capacity and efficiency of the existing roadway system is a very cost effective element of the transportation program. STATUS: Completed three Signal Synchronization grant projects: Grady Way (2001), Sunset Blvd. (2002), and NE 3rd/4th St. Corridor (2003). $15,000 - $17,000 in years 2002 through 2005 for Transportation's contribution to the City's GPS Mapping Program. Upgrading of all signal controllers to new to be compatible with the new Central System) continues into 9 ( p y ) 2006. CHANGES: Funded : 1781,589 IUnfunded Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 44,000 19,000 25,000 5,000 5,000 5 000 5,000 5 000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 146,000 71,000 75,000 15,000 15 000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Construction En /Admin 40,900 11,900 29,000 4,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Other 550,689 109 689 150,000 291 000 153,000 73,000 50,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 781,589 109:689 251,900 420,000 157,000 98,000 75,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 771,189 99,289 251,900 420,000 157,000 98,000 75,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand 10,400 10,400 Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCESI 781,5891 109,689 251,9001 420,000 157,000 98,000 75,000 30,000 30,000130 000 Eff „y 05101 X5 610AM 5.25 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP CBD Bicycle and Pedestrian Connections Type: 4 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 26 CONTACT: Fund: Proj: Dan Hasty 317 12185 425.430.7246 DESCRIPTION: This program will plan, design and construct projects which support non -motorized access to and circulation within the downtown. It focuses on connection to and between significant non -automobile transportation features such as the Cedar River Trail, Lake Washington Loop trail, South Renton Park & Ride and the Renton Transit Center. Preservation of existing bike and pedestrian features is also part of the program. JUSTIFICATION: Providing non -motorized circulation and connections between downtown transportation elements is challenging due to existing development. The City is committed to enhancing non -motorized access and circulation within the entire downtown, as well as making connections to transportation features outside the downtown area. STATUS: 14 ADA curb ramps will be installed in late summer 2005 at locations that either have sub - standard ramps or vertical curbs. CHANGES: The entire downtown core will be accessible to all upon completion of the 2005 curb ramp construction. In 2006, the program emphasis on upgrading and installing curb ramps will change to sidewalk preservation. Funded : 1374,956 lUnfunded Project Totals Programmed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 34,656 156 4,500 30,000 5,000 5,000. 5,000 5 000 5,000 5 000 Precon En /Admin 41,400 11,400 30,000 500 5 000 5,000 5 000 5 000 5,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 278,500 25,000 30,300 223,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 37,200 Construction En /Admin 20,400 3,600 16,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2 800 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 374,956 25,156 49,800 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 374,800 25,000 49,800 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Proposed Fund Balance 156 156 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I. D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 374,9561 25,156 49,800 300,000 50,0001 50,000 50,000 50,000. 50,000 50,000 CDB 8ik._F.d OBI 1=5 8:10AM 5 - 26 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Arterial Rehabilitation Program Type: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE Functional Classification: various Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 27 CONTACT: Fund: Proj: James Wilhoit 317 12186 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: As funding is available, this program will provide for the rehabilitation of arterial streets where the restoration requirements are beyond that which can be accomplished through the annual Overlay Program. JUSTIFICATION: The Overlay Program concentrates to a great degree on maintaining residential streets, where relatively small traffic volumes and less truck and bus traffic make standard asphalt overlays a long term means of maintenance. Arterial streets can often deteriorate rather quickly and often require more costly rehabilitation measures and/or costly temporary repairs to avoid more extensive deterioration. A number of arterials identified as needing major rehabilitaion are being addressed in this program and the Overlay Program. STATUS: Proposed paving schedule: 2005 - South 7th St., 2006 - NE 4th St., 2007 - NE 12th., 2008 NE 3rd St., 2009 - South Carr Rd., 2010 - Puget Dr. SE. $200,000 in King County Metro Mitigation funding was used in 2004/2005. CHANGES: Funded : 11,763,916 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Pro ram ITEM Programmed Spent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 54,000 54,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 1,655,916 193,916 195,000 1,267,000 222,000 187,000 322,000 212,000 162,000 162,000 Construction En /Admin 54,000 54,000 9,000 9,000 9,0001 9,000 9,000 9,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 1,763,916 193,916 195,000 1,375,000 240,000 205,000 340,0001 230,000 180,000 180,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 820,800 45,000 775,800 55,000 50,000 281,600 95,000 147,1001 147,100 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 743,116 143,916 599,200 185,000 155,000 58,400 135,000 32,900 32 900 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Metro Mitigation) 200,000 193,916 6,084 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1,763,9161 193,9161 195,0001 1,375,000 240,0001 205,000 340,0001 230,000 180,000 180 000 Aft-LstNmb W01R005 6'10" 5 - 27 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2nnB - 2n11 SIX -YEAR TIP Duvall Ave NE - SR-900 to North City Limits Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj. Length: 1.67 miles Proj: 12123 RANK: 28 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: Widening roadway to 5 lanes, includes: curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, street lighting, channelization, and bikeway from SR-900 to the North City limits. JUSTIFICATION: Growing residential areas use this route which is also becoming a major through route between Renton and Bellevue, as well as freight traffic. STATUS: Received a TIB grant in partnership with King County; the City of Newcastle also received a TIB grant for their section of Coal Creek Parkway. The City of Renton's grant award is $3,095,640. The City is managing King County's project separately. CHANGES: Increase in construction cost estimate of approximately $700,000. Construction delayed to late 2005 or 2006 due to environmental and drainage issues. Funding spent tracked through project spreadsheet, not Eden, due to project split -out. Funded : 14,303,219 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Pro ram ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 927,966 519,391 356,475 52,100 52,100 R-O-W includes Admin 448,258 12,028 436,230 Construction Contract Fee 2,712,700 50,000 2,662 700 2,262 700 400,000 Construction En /Admin 214,295 7,295 207,000 160,000 47,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 4,303,219 531,419 850,000 2,921,800 2,474,800 447,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 22,274 22,274 Proposed Fund Balance 588,405 40,479 547,926 421,200 126,726 Grants In -Hand TIB 3,095,640 382,666 675,100 2,037,874 1,967,600 70,274 Mitigation In -Hand 596,900 86,000 174,900 336,000 86,000 250,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 4,303,2191 531,419, 850,0001 2,921,800 2,474,8001 447,000 0-1 5 - 28 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Railroad Crossing Safety Program Type: 5 - OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12166 RANK: 29 CONTACT: Karl Hamilton 425.430.7220 DESCRIPTION: Install railroad crossing upgrade improvements at locations determined to warrant safety improvements. Depending on the needs of the location, work could include rubber crossing pads, lighted or unlighted signing, motion detectors, gates and connections to traffic signals to provide signal pre-emption. JUSTIFICATION: Railroad roadway crossings can present a serious safety concern that needs to be addressed when conditions warrant improvements. STATUS: Concrete railroad crossing upgrades completed in 2002: Bronson/Houser mainline, SW 7th Street, Lind Avenue SW spurs, and Mill Avenue. Moved the Railroad Crossing Safety Program grant to Lake Washington Blvd. - Park Ave. N to Coulon Park project in 2003. CHANGES: Funded : 135,182 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 35,182 182 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other Lake Wash. Xing) TOTAL EXPENSES 35,182 182 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 35,182 182 5,000 30,000 5,000 5,000 10,000 10,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 35,182, 182 5,000, 30,000 5 000 5,000 10,000 10,000 RR %npt Od IQ005 610O 5 - 29 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP rtation Demand Management Program 's TDM program implements the State's Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Act by encouraging a m in the use of single occupancy vehicles (SOV). Incentives are offered to employees (at ;ses with 100 or more employees) arriving to work between 6 and 9 AM. The City has two CTR ns: 1. The Citywide and 2. the City Hall CTR program (see note below). The TIP funds the e CTR Program and offers technical assistance to Renton businesses affected by the Act. Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12135 RANK: 30 CONTACT: Nate Jones 425.4: STATUS: It is expected that technical assistance to employers for the Citywide program will continue at current levels in future years provided State funds in support of this program continue. Renton receives a State allotment every two years to help fund the Citywide CTR program. The actual amount is determined by the number of CTR-affected worksites and the number of trips reduced. JUSTIFICATION: CHANGES: The City is required by 1991 State Legislation to develop and implement a CTR program. This law applies to areas of the State with continuing air quality problems. TDM is an important element in achieving desired transportation, environmental, and land use goals. Note: Renton City Hall is an affected CTR site and must implement its own CTR program for City employees; it is funded outside the TIP program. Project Totals I Programmed Pre-2006 I Six -Year Program ITEM I Programmed I Spent in 2004 1 2005 1 Total 2006 2007 1 2008 1 2009 2010 2011 152.81 64 200 TDM 06D7/X105 :1 5 - 30 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Transportation Concurrency / LOS Program Type: 4 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Functional Classification: NIA Proj. Length: NIA RANK: 31 Fund: 317 Proj: 12107 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: The City has created a city-wide Transportation Benefit Zone as part of the GMA Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Concurrency requirements to provide a source of funds for transportation improvements necessary to support new development. This project supports the necessary planning effort to determine appropriate fees to charge as part of the mitigation process, to adjust the fee due to transportation plan changes and other factors affecting the fees as a funding source and to monitor the funds collected. JUSTIFICATION: Management of the Transportation concurrency and mitigation programs are an integral part of planning transportation improvements, ensuring that new development pays a fair share of the cost, and in maintaining a level of service required under GMA to allow new development to be approved and to take place. STATUS: On -going yearly program. 2003 funds were used for LOS documentation and inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan. CHANGES: Funded : 1150,047 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 150,047 47 40,000 110,000 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 150,047 47 40,000 110,000 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 150,047 47 40,000 110,000 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 150 047 47 40,0001 110,000 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 10 000 Cq„arnn y MIOM 05 610 AM 5 - 31 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Missing Links Program Type: 5 - OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 32 CONTACT: Fund: Proj: Ran Plut 317 12106 425.430.7372 DESCRIPTION: This funding provides for the completion of transportation links that do not qualify for other sources of funding. An example would be a section of roadway between two LID's or between two developer mitigation improvement projects. JUSTIFICATION: Making the necessary, and often small-scale, improvements needed to connect other projects can achieve significant benefits. STATUS: With the ongoing development in the City, this funds potential City/developer partnership opportunities. The City will continue to identify and complete the priority missing links. CHANGES: Funded : 1236,886 IUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 28,000 4,000 24,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 168,000 24,000 144,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 Construction En /Admin 14,000 2,000 12,000 2,000 2,000 2 000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Other 26,886 26,886 TOTAL EXPENSES 236,886 26,886 30,000 180,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 236,886 26,886 30,000 180,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 236,8861 26,886, 30,0001 180,000 30 000 30,000, 30,000, 30,000 30,000 30,000 M_Unks 08I01RM5 9:10A 5 •32 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX YEAR TIP Geographic Information System - Needs Assessment Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12206 Type: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 33 CONTACT: Nate Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: Develop a Needs Assessment and Data Development Plan for Transportation Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data and software development to meet the requirements of City's departmental needs. JUSTIFICATION: The Transportation Systems Division is interested in expanding the development and use of GIS technology, data, and applications to support the Division's business needs. Effective use of GIS-related resources is dependent on careful planning and execution. The Needs Assessment allows the evaluation of Division needs and the development of an action plan for logical development and implementation of GIS capability within the Division. STATUS: City Transportation staff, in coordination with Technical Services and Information Services staff, are working on a Needs Assessment for transportation -related GIS data. A work plan is expected to be completed in 2005, and will be used to guide transportation -related GIS and software development. CHANGES: Funded : 1171,682 1 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Pro ram ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 171,682 16,682 20,000 135,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 171,682 16,682 20,000 135,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 171,682 16,682 20,000 135,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Miti ation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 171,682 16,682 20,000 135,000 1 35,0001 20,000 20,000 20,0001 20,000 20,000 c+s aMMM 8:10AM 5 - 33 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 9nns - 2D11 SIX -YEAR TIP Grady Way Corridor Study Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Fund: 317 Proj. Length: 0.44 miles Proj: 12127 Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM RANK: 34 CONTACT: Nathan Jones 425.430.7217 DESCRIPTION: In conjunction with WSDOT, Sound Transit, and property owners along the corridor, perform a comprehensive analysis of short- and long-range multi -modal transportation improvements. The City will conduct a pre -engineering study to evaluate short- and long-term traffic flow and safety improvements along Grady Way including major intersections and traffic controls from Main Avenue to the West City Limits. JUSTIFICATION: The two freeway interchanges and freeways and the high volume surface level regional routes of SR 515, Rainier Avenue, Lind Avenue, and Grady Way which converge in this area are of major importance to all travel modes, including transit, freight, HOV, and general-purpose travel. Grady Way is a critical east to west link serving the south Renton area and the downtown Central Business District; the potential for operational problems and congestion is high if this corridor is not managed effectively. STATUS: The City's Grady Way Study was added in 2003 to closely coordinate with WSDOTs proposed improvements for the 1-405/SR 167 interchange, as well as with the Rainier Avenue Corridor Study conducted by the City. Our coordination with WSDOT will assure that all proposed short-term and long-term improvements on these corridors will be compatible with one another and with long-range needs. CHANGES: A project proposal for the Grady Way Study will be under development and review by late 2005. Following review, a consultant selection process will be initiated, probably by early 2006. Funded : 1315.619 Unfunded : 13,000,000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 315,619 619 20,000 295,000 35,000 120,000 80,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Precon En /Admin 250,000 250,000 210,000 40 000 R-O-W includes Admin 250,000 250,000 250 000 Construction Contract Fee 2,500,000 2,500,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 3,315,619 619 20,000 3,295,000 35,000 120,000 80,000 230,000 1,810,000 1,020,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 160,619 619 160,000 20,000 80,000 20,000 20,0001 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 155,000 20,000 135,000 35 000 100 000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 3,000,000 3,000 000 210,000 1,790,000 11000,000 TOTAL SOURCES 3 315 619 619 20,000 3 295 000 35 000 120,000 80,000 230 000 1,810,000 1 020 000 G�dr co.. OVOM2006 610o 5-34 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Bicycle Route Development Program Type: 3 - COMMUNITY LIVABILITY / ENHANCEMENT Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 35 CONTACT: Fund: 317 Proj: 12173 Dan Hasty 425.430.7246 DESCRIPTION: Further develop the City's non -motorized facilities. Sign Bicycle Routes along preferred corridors. Construct missing links in the bicycle route system. Construct site -specific improvements. Upgrade routes as needed to safely accommodate bicycle traffic. Publicize Renton bicycle route network. Provides funding to match grant requests for bicycle construction improvements. JUSTIFICATION: The City does not currently have a well -developed bicycle route system; this program will complete an integrated system of bicycle routes and trails and upgrade streets to better accommodate bicycles. Many locations along existing and potential routes have site -specific safety problems, which would be addressed in this program. Additionally, there is a strong demand for better -developed non -motorized facilities in Renton. STATUS: Routes will be evaluated to assess the effects of any changes in the Trails Master Plan when the update is released by the Parks Department. CHANGES: Review of miscellaneous proposals for bicycle facilities within the rights -of -way for City projects such as Duvall Ave., NE 3rd/4th St., SW 27th St./Strander Blvd., and Benson Road. Funded : 1270.342 lUnfunded : 190,000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program Programmed Sent In 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 34,342 14,342 10,000 10,000 10 000 Precon En /Admin 56,000 10,000 46,000 10,000 2000 2,000 10,000 11,000 11.000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 246,000 246,000 14,000 14,000 90,000 64,000 64,000 Construction En /Admin 24,000 24,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 360,342 14,342 20,000 326,000 20,000 18,000 18,000 110,000 80,000 80,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 270,342 14,342 20,000 236,000 20,000 18,000 18,000 20,000 80,000 80,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 1 90,0001 90,000 90,000 TOTAL SOURCES 360,3421 14,342 20,0001 326,000 20,000 18,000 18,000 110,000 80,000. 80 000 S.w_Ro oefovm 7'.08 AM 5 - 35 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Lake Washington Blvd. - Park Ave N to Coulon Park Type: 4 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Functional Classification: Corrector Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12121 RANK: 36 CONTACT: ,lames Wilhoit 425.430,7318 DESCRIPTION: This project includes road widening, traffic signals, railroad crossings, drainage, curb, gutter and sidewalks. JUSTIFICATION: This project will serve the development and access needs to Coulon Park and to the Southport Development. STATUS: Developer to design and construct, and get credit toward mitigation contribution. The developer is completing the project in 3 phases. Project received $185,000 Railroad Crossing Safety grant. Estimated contract costs and developer reimbursement is included. CHANGES: Railroad crossing construction complete except for signal start-up requirements. Waiting for developer to continue their construction. Funded : 1543,518 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 15,000 13,600 1,400 1,400 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 498,500 287,000 1,000 210,500 78,500 132,000 Construction En /Admin 15,000 4,800 500 9,700 2 100 7,600 Other 15,018 10,518 4,500 2,500 2,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 543,518 315,918 1,500 226,100 84,500 141,600 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax 15,000 14,490 510 Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand 185,000 106 575 78,425 40,000 38,425 Mitigation In -Hand 343,518 194 853 990 147,675 44,500 103,175 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TO FAL tiOURC ES 543,5181 315,918 1,5001 226,100 1 84,5001 141,600 lk WA M01/2OS 6'10 AM 5 - 36 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 9nnA - 9(111 qlY-YEAR TIP Interagency Signal Coordination Type: 5 -OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12140 RANK: 37 CONTACT: Karl Hamilton 425.430.7220 DESCRIPTION: Provide means of signal coordination across jurisdictional boundaries of Renton, Kent, Tukwila, King County & WSDOT. Implement signal sequences coordinated through broadcast world time with necessary hardware to interface with Renton's master signal computer. Develop regional traffic flow parameters & signal timings. JUSTIFICATION: Improve traffic flows, reduce congestion, reduce fuel consumption & air pollution. FHWA demonstration project. STATUS: Tukwila is lead agency for an inter -jurisdictional ISTEA grant approved for design of this project. Grant funds are being managed by Tukwila for the other agencies. Project could be expanded to include Intelligent Transportation System Improvements on Carr Rd / SW 43rd St / S 180th Street corridor. CHANGES: In construction in 2005. Funded : 131,572 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 7,266 7 266 Precon En /Admin 7,184 7,184 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other 17,122 122 5,000 12,000 12 000 TOTAL EXPENSES 31,572 14,572 5,000 12,000 12,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 31,572 14,572 5,000 12,000 12,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.Ws Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 31,5721 14,572f 5,0001 12,000 1 12,0001 uQ— Ca om"2005 elom 5 - 37 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION ,)nnA - gf111 CIX-YFAR TIP Environmental Monitoring Program T e: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 38 Fund: 317 Proj: 12187 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: Monitoring of wetland mitigation installed as a project environmental requirement and to perform biological assessments as required by the Endangered Species Act. JUSTIFICATION: Monitoring ensures that the wetland vegetation installed is properly established. Creates an account to pay for unscheduled project environmental assessments. STATUS: The Year 3 report for the Oakesdale, Phase 1, site has been sent to the regulatory agencies for review. The Year 1 report for the Phase 2 site is being prepared. Phase 1 and 2 site maintenance continues. CHANGES: Attempting to get early acceptance for the Phase 1 site due to its recent success. Funded : 1429,838 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 105,000 15,000 90,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,0001 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 50,000 15,000 35,000 10,000 5,0001 5,000 5,000 5,000 5 000 Construction En /Admin 274,838 99,838 55,000 120,000 50,000.. 30,000 10,000 10,000 10 000 10 000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 429,838 99,838 85,000 245,000 75,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 170,838 25,838 20,000 125 000 20,000 25,000 17,500 12,500 25,000 25,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Miti ation In -Hand 259,000 74,000 65,000 120,000 55,000 25,000 12,500 17,500 5,000 5,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Miti ation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 429,8381 99,8381 85,0001 245,000 1 75,0001 50,000 30,000 30,0001 30,000130 000 E- OW01/2005 6:10AM 5 - 38 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Trans -Valley and Soos Creek Corridor Program Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12191 RANK: 39 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: A joint study with King County, Kent, Tukwila and SeaTac to evaluate long-term and short-term multi -modal transportation improvements in the Soos Creek and Valley area. This program will fund study and pre -design work plus matching funds for grant applications. JUSTIFICATION: This is an area with limited transportation facilities while experiencing high growth rates. STATUS: The Trans -Valley Study was completed in March 2002, providing documentation, research, priority corridor identification, and potential solution sets. Further work placed on indefinite hold by King County in 2003. Design coordination continues with King County Carr Road Corridor projects. Funding for projects that are developed may come from the Arterial HOV and the Arterial Circulation Programs. CHANGES: Program extended through 2008. Funded : 121,886 1 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 21,886 4 886 2,000 15,000 5 000 5,000 5 000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 21,886 4,886 2,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 21,886 4 886 2,000 15,000 5,000 5 000 5,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL 500=1 21,8861 4,886 2,0001 15,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 TnroV.1 OWAQW5 Clow 5 - 39 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 7nnr - gn11 GIX-YEAR TIP WSDOT Coordination Program Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: N/A Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 40 CONTACT: Fund: Proj: Sharon Griffin 317 12146 425.430.7232 DESCRIPTION: Provide pre -design, design and construction coordination for WSDOT projects within or adjacent to Renton to assure that those projects provide the maximum benefits and minimum problems for Renton's transportation system. JUSTIFICATION: WSDOT projects can have signficant impacts within the City. STATUS: Ongoing yearly program. Staff coordinating on the 1-405 Corridor Study and other grant - funded projects. CHANGES: Funded : 189137 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 89,137 9 137 15,000 65,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 89,137 9,137 15,000 65,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 89,137 9,137 15,000 65,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,0001 10,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 89,1371 9137 15,000! 65,000 15,000, 10,000 10,000 10,000, 10,000, 10,0001 W500T owir z 8:10 AM 5 - 40 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP 1% for the Arts Program Type: 3 - COMMUNITY LIVABILITY / ENHANCEMENT Functional Classification: N/A Fund: Proj. Length: NSA Proj: RANK: 41 CONTACT: Sharon Griffin 317 12112 425.430.7232 DESCRIPTION: Beautify entrance locations to the City. Projects to include signing and landscaping. Funding is tied to the calculated share of eligible types of transportation projects and transportation funding subject to the City's1 % for the Arts program. All gateway project proposals under this program are subject to approval of the Arts Commission. JUSTIFICATION: Displays a sense of civic pride. STATUS: Program is now based on actual design and construction costs. 2001 was estimated and the remainder from the actual costs was used for 2002 and part of 2003. $3,278 was transferred in 2004 to cover the remaining 2003 expenditures. CHANGES: $15,669 was transferred in 2005 for 1 % of 2004 actual expenditures. [Funded: 1263,278 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 7,000 1 000 6,000 1 000 1 000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other 256,278 3,278 29,000 224,000 59 000 29,000 29,000 49,000 29,000 29,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 263,278 3,278 30,000 230,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 263,278 3,278 30,000 230,000 60,000 30,000 30 000 50 000 30,000 30,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Miti ation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 263,2781 3,278 30,0001 230,000 60,000 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 30 000 1%AM O6 l/= 6:10 AM 5-41 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 90nS - 9n11 SIX-YFAR TIP Arterial HOV Program Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: N/A Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12160 RANK: 42 CONTACT: Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: Perform a comprehensive analysis of short and long term HOV needs for the Renton area and develop a prioritized list with cost estimates of recommended arterial improvements, such as HOV lanes, HOV queue jumps, park and ride lots and other HOV facilities. Also provides funding in future years for construction of high priority projects as they are identified. JUSTIFICATION: Development of arterial HOV improvements will be necessary to promote the use and efficiency of transit and other HOV mobility options. Funding from this program will be directed to individual projects with HOV facilities as those projects move forward. STATUS: HOV Arterial Study to identify specific improvements along three corridors has been completed. Sound Transit Direct Access Program will need to do pre -design work and construction in upcoming years. CHANGES: Funded : 1137,364 IUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 136,474 121,474 5,000 10,000 10,000 Precon En /Admin 880 880 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 137,354 122,354 5,000 10,000 10,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 56,210 41,210 5,000 10,000 10,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -hand ISTEA 81,144 81,144 Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SQURZS�l 137,354 122,354 5,000 10,000 1 10,000 M_HOV 00101=05 6:10AM 5 - 42 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION gnnFR _ 7r111 q[Y-YEAR TIP Park -Sunset Corridor - Garden Avenue to Duvall Avenue Type: 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM Functional Classification: Principal Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 43 CONTACT: Fund: 317 Proj: 12177 Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: Identify and construct traffic operational improvements as needed throughout the corridor. JUSTIFICATION: This important corridor is subject to high growth in travel demand. STATUS: CHANGES: Study to be initiated in 2005 with selection of a transportation consultant in 2006. Funded : 1466,277 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 76,277 11,277 15,000 50,000 50,000 Precon En /Admin 390,000 390.000 390,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee Construction En /Admin Other TOTAL EXPENSES 466,277 11,277 15,000 440,000 50,000 390,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 28,377 11,277 15,000 2,100 2,100 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 437,900 437,900 50,000 387,900 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOU RCESI 466,2771 11,2771 15,0001 440,000 1 50,0001 390,000 Pvk Suwt 0601=05 a-10 AM 5 - 43 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Lind Avenue - SW 16th St to SW 43rd St Type: 5 - OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Proj. Length: 1.69 miles RANK: 44 CONTACT: Fund: 317 Proj: 24 Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: Widen existing roadway to 5 lanes where required. Includes new roadway, curbs, sidewalks, drainage, signals, lighting, signing and channelization. JUSTIFICATION: Increasing traffic demands in the Valley including the proposed development at the Boeing Longacres site, will create the need for increasing the capacity of this major north/south arterial. STATUS: The needs, priorities and schedules for improvements on Lind Avenue will be determined through Arterial Circulation studies. Construction of a signal at the intersection of Lind Av and SW 27th St occurred in 1998 as an initial phase. CHANGES: Funded : I 10 000 lUnfunded 12,540,000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 10,000 5000 5,000 5,000 Precon En /Admin 78,000 78,000 78,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 2,280 000 2,280 000 1,700,000 580,000 Construction En /Admin 182,000 182,000 1 136,000 46,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 2,550,000 5,000 2,545,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed 830,000 830,000 1 630,000 200,000 Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 1,710,000 1 1,710,000 1,284,000 426,000 2,550,0001 5,0001 2,545,000 5,000 1,914,000 626,000 LUM 0&V12005 610 AM 5 - 44 DRAFT 169 HOV - 140th Way SE to SR-900 2 - MULTI -MODAL / TDM CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Functional Classification: Principal Fund: 317 Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12175 RANK: 45 CONTACT: Rob Lochmiller 425.430.7303 DESCRIPTION: STATUS: Construct queue jumps and bypass lanes that provide transit priority traffic signal improvements on SR-169 (Maple WSDOT committed $300,000 to design and $450,000 to construction. King County committed Valley Highway) at 140th Way SE and in the area 1-405. Involves roadway widening at intersection approaches approximately $275,000 to this project by constructing a holding pond at 140th Way SE for our us and modifications to channelization and traffic signals. Also includes widening to improve the north -bound on ramp Design is complete for total buildout. Received TEA-21 Countywide grant of $392,947 for and south -bound off ramp movement at the 1-405/SR 169 interchange. Improve access to Cedar River Park and construction. Council allocated $1.2 million from the King County Metro mitigation fund ('included Stoneway site through traffic modifications. in proposed fund balance). iTIFICATION: CHANGES: is a high volume, high congestion corridor where providing travel time benefits for transit and car/van pools All phases for this project are now funded. Awarded $2,208,000 from the Transportation be achieved with high cost effectiveness. Also there are severe congestion and safety problems that can be Improvement Board (TIB) for Phase 2 right-of-way and construction. Received $765,993 TEA-21 essed by adding a right turn lane west -bound on SR-169 and a protected right turn lane from the 1-405 Countywide funds for Phase 2 construction. State legislature funded $2.5M in gas tax revenue for ibound off ramp on to east -bound SR-169. 2007-2009 biennium. Project Totals I Programmed Pre-2006 I Six -Year Program 1 ITEM I Programmed 1 Spent Pre-2005 1 2005 1 Total 1 2006 1 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 1,117 (Business License Fee 1 197,2511 1 1 197,251 1 197 251 Proposed Fund Balance 1 1.200.0001 178.9911 724.8531 296.156 1 1 296 156 M SR16R-HOV owirz= 6:10AM 5 - 45 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2006 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP Benson Road South - Main Avenue to S 26th St Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj. Length: 0.6 miles Proj: 12309 Type: 3 -COMMUNITY LIVABILITY / ENHANCEMENT RANK: 46 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: This project will complete three missing sidewalk links (2300 LF) on the east side of Benson Road S. A small retaining wall, raised painted crosswalk, and pedestrian refuge island will also be part of the project. JUSTIFICATION: Needed to improve the safety for children traveling to and from school and provide a safe pedestrian facility for those doing business north and south of the project. STATUS: Project is under design and should go to ad by July 2005. Awarded a TIB Pedestrain Safety & Mobility Program (PMSP) grant of $150,000 which will likely be reduced due to reduced grant scope (transfer of 1000 LF to WSDOT 1-405 project). CHANGES: Due to the upcoming WSDOT project to widen 1-405 and realign Benson Rd, the southern 1000 LF of sidewalk will be constructed by WSDOT and has been removed from this project scope. un ed:1 225,4631 Unfunde Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed. Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 47,563 7 563 40,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 165,400 165,400 Construction En /Admin 12,500 10,000 2,500 2 500 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 225,463 7,563 215,400 2,500 2,500 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 5,063 2,563 2,500 2,500 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand 70,400 70,400 Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L. I. D.'s Formed Other In -Hand KC Metro Mit. 150,000 5,000 145,000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 1 225,4631 7,563 215,4001 2,500 1 2,5001 8-RbTIS om1R005 6:10 AM 5 - 46 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 9nns - 9(111 SIX-YPAR TIP NE Sunset By / Duvall Av NE Functional Classification: MinorArteriai Fund: 317 Proj. Length: Proj: 12301 Type: 5 - OPERATIONS AND SAFETY RANK: 47 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: The project will realign and rechannelize lanes approaching, through and exiting the intersection, add an eastbound left -turn lane, modify the traffic signals, and extend a drop lane. The modification of the fully actuated traffic signal will include poles, signal and pedestrian displays, detection loops, emergency pre- emption, and a new signal controller. JUSTIFICATION: The intersection experiences a high number of accidents including turning movements, rear ends, and side swipes. STATUS: Awarded an HES grant for $396,000 in 2002. Design cost increased by $56,000 due to additional surveying and re -design requirements. CHANGES: Increase in construction cost estimate. Going to ad in August 2005. Ineligible costs reflect items outside the original scope of the grant such as extending lane lengths required by WSDOT (on state route) and additional drainage improvements to the area. Funding spent tracked through project spreadsheet, not Eden, due to project split -out. $20,000 of 2005 allocation moved to 2006. Funded : 1942,861 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Pro ram ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 92,000 87,861 4,139 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 597,300 574,000 23,300 23,300 Construction En /Admin 64,561 56,561 8,000 8,000 Other (Ineligible costs 189,000 23,000 164,000 2,000 2,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 942,861 110,861 798,700 33,300 33,300 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 92,800 59,500 33,300 33,300 Proposed Fund Balance 404,561 12,661 391,900 Grants In -Hand (HES) 396,000 29,700 366,300 Mitigation In -Hand 49,500 9,000 40,500 Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 942,8611 110,861 798,7001 33,300 33,300 S...VDN11 owir.10M 6:10AM 5 - 47 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION ?t7DR - ?D11 SIX -YEAR TIP Logan Av N Concrete Panel Repair Type: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 48 CONTACT: Fund: 317 Proj: 12303 James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: Location: From the Logan Avenue Bridge north to N 6th St. Repair concrete panels under the asphalt to stop the panels from moving. JUSTIFICATION: The panels are moving , causing the asphalt overlay to severely spall at the joints. STATUS: CHANGES: Low priority. Funded : I lUnfunded 1460,000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six ear Program ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 25,000 25,000 25,000 Precon En /Admin 25,000 25,000 25,000 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 400,000 400,000 400,000 Construction En /Admin 10,000 10,000 1 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 460,000 460,000 460,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Pro osed Other Proposed Undetermined 460,0001 460,000 460 000 TOTAL SOURCES 460,0001 1 460,000 460,000 LW.. P-1 061012m 6:10 AM 5-48 DRAFT CITY OF .._,JTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 2008 - 2011 SIX -YEAR TIP S Carr Rd / Mill Avenue S Type: 5 -OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Proj. Length: N/A RANK: 49 CONTACT: Fund: 317 Proj: 12304 Keith Woolley 425.430.7318 DESCRIPTION: Install new traffic signal, including poles, signal and pedestrian displays, detection loops, emergency pre- emption, a new signal controller, and associated channelization. Also, construct roadway widening to accommodate turning lanes. JUSTIFICATION: A traffic signal is warranted based on vehicular volumes, delay, and safety. New developments north of the intersection have been required to participate with the City. Adjacent private school desires to participate in order to realign their access to become the fourth leg to signalized intersection. King County Carr Rd Corridor project possibly will widen and/or realign Carr Rd through this project site. A signal will provide a safe, pedestrian environment and crossing of Carr Rd. STATUS: Project currently at the planning level, being coordinated with Development Services/new developments, the King County Carr Rd project, and New Horizons private school. CHANGES: Funded : 35 000 Unfunded : 750 000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Pro ram ITEM Programmed Sent in 2004 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 15,000 2,000 13,000 3,000 10,000 Precon En /Admin 60,000 60,000 20,000 40,000 R-O-W includes Admin 100,000 100,000 100,000 Construction Contract Fee 300,000 300,000 300,000 Construction En /Admin 310,000 310,000 1 200,000 100,000 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 785,000 2,000 783,000 3,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,000 10,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 35,000 2,000 33,000 3 000 10,000 20,000 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand g10,000 Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 750,0001 750,000 340,000 400,000 TOTAL SOURCF-S 785,000 2,000 783,000 3,000 10,000 20,000 340,000 400,000 C.-Mill 08/012005 8:10 AM 5-49 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION ?nnA - 2f111 SIX-YFAR TIP Houser Way S - Main Av S to Burnett Av S Type: 5 - OPERATIONS AND SAFETY Functional Classification: Non-arteriai Fund: 317 Proj. Length: 0.2 mites Proj: 12213 RANK: 50 CONTACT: James Wilhoit 425.430.7319 DESCRIPTION: Upgrade railroad tracks to concrete on Houser Way S between Main Avenue S and Burnette Avenue S. JUSTIFICATION: This segment of roadway has a pavement management OCI rating (Year 2003) as low as between 0 and 12 points (out of a possible 100 points). The quality of the roadway is very poor due to the flexing of the tracks. An overlay will only be effective if the tracks are placed in concrete. STATUS: Discussions with Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad to share funding on this project were initiated in 2003. BNSF Indicated by letter of 5/20/03 that it was not interested in the City's proposal. The project remains unfundec. CHANGES: Funded:Fundedd I Unfunded :1 810,000 Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six -Year Program ITEM Programmed Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 800,000 800,000 800,000 Construction En /Admin 10,000 10,000 10,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 810,000 810,000 810,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed BNSF 480,000 480,000 480,000 Undetermined 330,0001 330,000 330,000 TOTAL SOURCES 1 810,0001 810,000 810,0001 Ho�wr trka OMM2005 610 AM 5 - 50 DRAFT CITY OF, ._NTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 7nnri - 9n11 SIX -YEAR TIP Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Fund: 317 Type: 1 -INFRASTRUCTURE Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12302 RANK: 51 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425,430.7243 DESCRIPTION: Retain the failing slope on the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard and reconstruct both north and southbound lanes within the slide area. This project will be coordinated with the Coal Creek Utility District for the repair of their sewer line within the slide area. The project limits are along Lake Washington Boulevard from NE 51st St south 0.1 mile. JUSTIFICATION: Since the Nisqually Earthquake in 2001, the slope along the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard (LWB) has been moving. Consequently, this has produced a large semi -circular crack in the southbound lane of LWB. Additionally, Coal Creek Utility staff has noticed that their sewer line has moved with the slide. Attempts have been made to seal the cracks in the roadway and have been unsuccessful due to the rapid movement of the slide. STATUS: Construction to be completed in 2005. As-builts to be finished in 2006. CHANGES: Project contract $27,000 lower than original estimate; additional funds were needed for design and may be needed for construction engineering due to the nature of the project. Funds in 2006 moved from 2005 allocation. Funded : 1640,000 lUnfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed Spent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development 27,356 27,356 Precon En /Admin 79,486 74,086 5,400 R-O-W includes Admin 1,373 1,373 Construction Contract Fee 470,000 470,000 Construction En /Admin 61,785 59,385 2,400 2 400 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 640,000 102,815 534,785 2,400 2,400 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 640,000 102,815 534,785 2 400 2,400 Proposed Fund Balance Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined 640,0001 102,8151 534,7851 2,400 1 2,400 LVM Slid O6g1R005 610 Nx1 5-51 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION 20nFi - 9n11 SIX-YFAR TIP Monster Road Bridge Repair Functional Classification: Fund: 317 Proj. Length: Proj: 12307 Type: 1 - INFRASTRUCTURE RANK: 52 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 425.430.7243 DESCRIPTION: Install longitudinal restrainers on the top and bottom flanges of each of the girder lines, place a steel support (corbel) at the bottom of each girder, and inject each of the cracks with epoxy material. JUSTIFICATION: During the 2003 bridge inspection, it was reported to the City that each of the girders had cracks that needed immediate attention. A live load test was conducted using instrumentation that measures small movements in cracks. It was found that the cracks were opening under load, an indication that the bridge was not behaving as the intended design. STATUS: Construction to be completed in 2005. CHANGES: As-builts and project closeout in 2006. Total project cost was increased to $672,000 by Council in 2004 to reflect rapidly increasing steel prices. Additional bridge testing required to verify repair increased project costs further. Funded:Funded:1 698,9341 Unfunded Project Totals Pro rammed Pre-2006 Six Year Program ITEM Programmed. Sent Pre-2005 2005 Total 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 EXPENSES: Project Development Precon En /Admin 115,181 115,181 R-O-W includes Admin Construction Contract Fee 564,320 80,620 468 700 15,000 15,000 Construction En /Admin 19,433 7,433 12,000 12,000 Other TOTAL EXPENSES 698,934 203,234 468,700 27,000 27,000 SOURCES OF FUNDS: Vehicle Fuel Tax Business License Fee 39,000 12,000 27,000 27,000 Proposed Fund Balance 659,934 203,234 456,700 Grants In -Hand Mitigation In -Hand Bonds/L.I.D.'s Formed Other In -Hand Grants Proposed Mitigation Proposed L.I.D.'s Proposed Other Proposed Undetermined TOTAL SOURCES 698,934, 203,234 468,700, 27,000 27,000, M-- Rd Brdg OW01=05 6:10 AM 5 - 52 DRAFT CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION JDuvall Ave NE (Coal Creek Parkway) - King County ning roadway to 5 lanes, includes: curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage improvements, street lighting, nelization, signal modification and interconnection, and bikeway from Renton's north city limits to SE Way (Newcastle's south city limits). TIFICATION: ving residential areas use this route which is also becoming a major through route between Renton Bellevue, as well as freight traffic. There are currently two general-purpose lanes with little or no ;strian facilities, and left -turn lanes at various locations. Because there are uncompleted gaps ,een the five -lane sections from unincorporated King County to Sunset Bv., the arterial exhibits lestion and travel -time delays for all modes of traffic. IM Functional Classification: Minor Arterial Fund: 317 Proj. Length: Proj: 12305 DAAIII- 94 f+n WTAf`T- 1———..11. 4 A-fC— STATUS: The City is managing the King County project with full reimbursement from the County per approved interlocal agreement. All programmed funding is subject to King County's ongoing approval. King County manages the grant reimbursement for their TIB grant award of $3,196,000. CHANGES: Construction delayed to 2005 or 2006 due to environmental, drainage and County coordination issues. Increase in construction cost estimate. R-O-W costs, other than minor administrative costs, have been removed; R-O-W will be purchased directly by King County. Funding spent tracked through project spreadsheet, not Eden, due to project split out; actual reimbursement shown Pre-2005. ITEM I Proarammed I Snent Pre-2005 1 2005 1 Total 1 2006 1 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 Tax Hand D..A-" Cara 0"Ir2 05 6:10 AM 5 - 53 DRAFT SECTION SIX APPENDIX • Abbreviations & Acronyms 6-1 • TIP Adopting Resolution 6-2 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS The following list defines the abbreviated words or acronyms used in the City of Renton's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan. ACP Asphalt Concrete Pavement ADA American Disability Act AIP Arterial Improvement Program (administered by TIB) BNSF Burlington Northern Sante Fe BRAC Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee CBD Central Business District CIP Capital Improvement Program CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality CTR Commute Trip Reduction (State Act) DOE Department of Ecology EB Eastbound ECL East City Limits EIS Environmental Impact Study ER Emergency Relief FAS Federal Aid Secondary Program FAUS Federal Aid Urban System FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration GIS Geographic Information System GMA Growth Management Act HCT High Capacity Transit HES Federal Aid Hazard Elimination and Safety Program HOV High Occupancy Vehicles UC Interchange ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (Federal Highway Bill) ITS Intelligent Transportation System IVHS Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems LID Local Improvement District LOS Level of Service METRO Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle MUTCD Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices NCL North City Limits NB Northbound PMS Pavement Management System Precon Preconstruction Engineering/Administration (design phase of project) PS&E Plans, Specifications, and Estimates ROW Right-of-way RUSH Renton Urban Shuttle SB Souhbound 6-1 r SC&DI SCATBd SCL SMA SOV ST STP TDM TEA-21 TIA TIB TIP TOD TPP UATA UPRR VMS WB WCL WSBIS WSDOT Surveillance Control and Driver Information South County Area Transportation Board South City Limits Structural Matrix Asphalt Single Occupant Vehicle Sound Transit Surface Transportation Program Transportation Demand Management Program Transportation Efficiency Act Transportation Improvement Account (previous TIB program) Transportation Improvement Board Transportation Improvement Plan Transit Oriented Development Transportation Partnership Program (administered by TIB) Urban Arterial Trust Account (previous TIB program) Union Pacific Railroad Vehicle Master System Westbound West City Limits Washington State Bridge Inventory System Washington State Department of Transportation I:\TIPs\2006\PublishW CRONYMS.DOC CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, UPDATING THE CITY'S SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2006-2011. WHEREAS, the City of Renton has heretofore adopted a "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program" pursuant to RCW 35.77.010, and the plan and program having been amended and modified from time to time as authorized by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after recommendation of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department, held a public hearing on July 11, 2005, after notice to the public as provided by law for the purpose of considering adoption, modification, and amendments of the plan and program; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing held on July 11, 2005, due consideration was given to the proposed changes and amendments for the purpose of updating the plan and program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The City's "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial Street Plan" are hereby further amended and modified, all as more particularly shown on the attached Exhibits "A," "B" and "C" incorporated herein as if fully set forth. SECTION II. The plan and program, as evidenced by said Exhibits, shall be and constitute the City's "Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program" and the City's "Arterial Street Plan," and shall remain in full force and effect until further revised, amended, and modified as provided by law. 1 6.2 RESOLUTION NO. • SECTION III. The Administrator of the Department of Planning/Building/Public Works and the City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to file this Resolution, together with the Exhibits, with the Director of Highways for the State of Washington and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES. 1114:6/9/05:ma 2 day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of , 2005. Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI H: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Division June 20, 2005 Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Ryan Zulauf, x7471 Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Subject: Operating Permit and Agreement with WorldWind Correspondence.. Helicopters Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... X Exhibits: Issue Paper Study Sessions...... Operating Permit and Agreement Information......... Sublease Agreement Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment........ Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Approval is requested for a new Operating Permit and Agreement with WorldWind Helicopters. WorldWind Helicopters operates an aircraft charter/taxi service and aircraft maintenance facility, and has had an approved Operating Permit and Agreement for their sublease with Aero Dyne Aviation since January 2000. In January 2004, WorldWind Helicopters moved their business from the Aero Dyne hangar at the south end of the Airport to the 800 Building on the west side of the Airport to sublease from AirO, Inc. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of an Operating Permit and Agreement with WorldWind Helicopters and their sublease with AirO, Inc. H:\AIR\Projects\Tasks\Agenda Bills\AgBill for Worldwind Helic sublease wAirO.doc CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 7, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: �1(/oA / Mayor Kathy Keolker- eeler FROM: Gregg Zimmerman ministrator Planning/Building/Public Works STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager ( x7471) SUBJECT: Operating Permit and Agreement with Worldwind Helicopters ISSUE: Approval is requested for a new Operating Permit and Agreement with WorldWind Helicopters for their sublease from AirO, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of an Operating Permit and Agreement with WorldWind Helicopters and their sublease with AirO, Inc. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: WorldWind Helicopters has been operating an aircraft charter/taxi service and aircraft maintenance and repair facility on the Airport since January 24, 2000. WorldWind Helicopters had been operating under an approved Operating Permit and Agreement for their sublease with South Cove Ventures, LLC, dba Aero Dyne Aviation. In January 2004, WorldWind Helicopters terminated their sublease with Aero Dyne and entered into a sublease with AirO, Inc. WorldWind Helicopters and Aero-Copters, Inc. are both owned by Mike O'Leary, owner of AirO, Inc. AirO, Inc. has had a lease agreement, LAG 03-002, with the City since November 1, 2003, for the purpose of operating an aircraft charter/taxi service and aircraft maintenance and repair facility. An Operating Permit and Agreement has been written for the new sublease between WorldWind Helicopters and AirO, Inc. and the sublease is an attachment to the Operating Permit and Agreement. H:FileSys/Air/Projects/Tasks/Agenda Bills/Iss paper worldwind helic sublease wAirO.doc PAG OPERATING PERMIT AND AGREEMENT between the City of Renton and WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. THIS IS A PERMIT TO OPERATE AN AVIATION RELATED ACTIVITY UPON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND AN AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation ("Permittor"), and WorldWind Helicopters, Inc., a Washington corporation ("Permittee"). IN CONSIDERATION of the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SUB -LEASE: I. I. Pursuant to lease agreement LAG 03-002, executed on November 1, 2003, the City of Renton (Permittor) granted a lease of the subject premises to AirO, Inc., as Lessee, for the purpose of operating a Fixed Based Operation, which includes the sale of jet fuel and avgas, aircraft maintenance and repair, aircraft storage and air taxi/charter services. 1.2. Thereafter, AirO, Inc.(Lessee) sublet the subject premises to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc., (Permittee) by sublease agreement, executed on January 1, 2004, for the purpose of operating an aircraft repair and maintenance facility and an air taxi/charter business for the benefit of the public, located at 800 West Perimeter Road, Renton, Washington. 2. GRANT OF OPERATING PERMIT: 2.1. Description of Premises: The premises leased by WorldWind Helicopters, Inc., the Permittee, is described in the sub -lease as: 2.1.1. Interior Space: Shared use of the lobby, flight planning room, conference room and restrooms. 2.1.2. Hangar Space: Shared use of the hangar building located at 800 West Perimeter I' •.o1 These two (2) categories (Paragraph 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 above) of the property, being subleased by AirO, Inc. to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc., shall hereafter be referred to as the "Premises". 3. CONDITIONS: 3.1. Specific Conditions: This grant of an Operating Permit is subject to the following: OPERATING PERMIT ORIGINAL City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. 3.1.1. Easements, restrictions and reservations of record and as further set forth herein; 3.1.2. Such rules and regulations as now exist or may hereafter be promulgated by the Permittor from time to time, including the Airport's Minimum Standards which are incorporated herein by this reference, and Permittor's standards concerning operation of public aviation service activities from the Airport; and 3.1.3. All such non-discriminatory charges and fees for such use as may be established from time to time by Permittor; and 3.1.4. TOGETHER WITH the privilege of Permittee to use the public portion of the Airport, including runway and other public facilities provided thereon, on a non-exclusive basis. 3.2. No Conveyance of Airport: This Operating Permit and Agreement shall in no way be deemed to be a conveyance of the Airport, and shall not be construed as providing any special privilege for any public portion of the Airport except as described herein. The Permittor reserves the right to lease or permit the use of any portion of the Airport for any purpose deemed suitable for the Airport, except that portion that is permitted hereby. 3.3. Nature of Permittor's Interest: It is expressly understood and agreed that Permittor holds and operates the Airport, and the Premises under and subject to a grant and conveyance thereof to Permittor from the United States of America, acting through its Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and subject to all the reservations, restrictions, rights, conditions, and exceptions of the United States therein and thereunder, which grant and conveyance has been filed for record in the office of the Recorder of King County, Washington, and recorded in Volume 2668 of Deeds, Page 386; and further that Penmittor holds and operates said airport and premises under and subject to the State Aeronautics Acts of the State of Washington (chapter 165, laws of 1947), and any subsequent amendments thereof or subsequent legislation of said state and all rules and regulations lawfully promulgated under any act or legislation adopted by the State of Washington or by the United States or the Federal Aviation Administration. It is expressly agreed that the Permittee also accepts and will hold and use this lease and the Premises subject thereto and to all contingencies, risks, and eventualities of or arising out of the foregoing, and if this lease or the period thereof or any terms or provisions thereof be or become in conflict with or impaired or defeated by any such legislation, rules, regulations, contingencies or risks, the latter shall control and, if necessary, modify or supersede any provision of this lease affected thereby, all without any liability on the part of or recourse against the Permittor in favor of Permittee, provided that Permittor does not exceed its authority under the foregoing legislation, rules and regulations. 3.4. Future Development/Funding: Nothing contained in this lease shall operate or be construed to prevent or hinder the future development, improvements, or operation of Airport by Permittor, its agents, successors or assigns, or any department or agency of the State of OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. Washington or of the United States, or the consummation of any loan or grant of federal or state funds in aid of the development, improvement, or operation of the Renton Airport. 4. TERM OF LEASE, SUBLEASE AND OPERATING PERMIT: 4.1. Permit Term: The term of this Operating Permit is one (1) year and may be extended to include any Extended Term as may be in effect between AirO, Inc. and WorldWind Helicopters, Inc.. After the Initial Term, the Extended Term of the sublease is on a year-to-year basis, for a period of ten (10) years, ending on January 1, 2014. Any extension of the Initial Term of this Operating Permit is only renewable upon written notice received by theCity ninety (90) calendar days in advance of the termination date of the Initial or Extended Term of this Operating Permit and Agreement. In no event will the term of the Operating Permit and Agreement be extended beyond November 1, 2018. 5. RENTAL: 5.1. Rent on lease: As rental for the premises described in LAG 03-002 and addenda thereto, Lessee has agreed to pay Permittor a monthly rental in the sum of Four Thousand Six Hundred Ninety -Five Dollars and Ninety -Two Cents ($4,695.92) throughout the twelve (12) month period commencing on November 1, 2003, which does not include leasehold excise tax. 5.2. Rent on sublease: As rental for the premises described in Section 2, above, during the term of this permit, Permittee has agreed to pay AirO, Inc. a monthly rental in the sum of Four Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($4,500) throughout the twelve (12) month period commencing on January 1, 2004. In the event Lessee fails to pay the rent identified in Paragraph 5.1., then Permittee may, whether Permittee subleases all or part of Lessee's Airport leasehold interest as described in LAG 03-002 and addenda thereto, pay said rent, when due. In the event neither the Lessee nor Permittee pay said rent, then the Permittor may terminate this permit with ten (10) days notice. 5.3. Other Charges: Permittee further agrees to pay, in addition to the rental specified and other charges hereinabove defined, all fees and charges now in effect or hereafter levied or established by Permittor, or its successors, or by any other governmental agency or authority, being or becoming levied or charged against the premises, structures, business operations, or activities conducted by or use made by Permittee of, on, and from the leased premises which shall include, but not be limited to, all charges for light, heat, gas, power, garbage, water and other utilities or services rendered to said premises. 5.4. Leasehold Excise Tax: In the event that the State of Washington or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction thereover shall hereafter levy or impose any similar tax or charge on the leasehold estate described herein, and Lessee fails to pay said tax or charge, then Permittee may, whether Permittee subleases all or part of Lessee's Airport leasehold interest as described in LAG 03-002 and addenda thereto, pay said tax or charge, when due. Such tax or charge shall be in addition to the regular monthly rentals. In the event neither the Lessee nor OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. Permittee pay said tax or charge, then the Permittor may terminate this permit with ten (10) days notice. 6. PAYMENT OF UTILITIES AND RELATED SERVICES. 6.1. Whether Permittee subleases all or part of Lessee's Airport leasehold interest as described in LAG 03-002 and addenda, if Lessee fails to pay such utilities and service charges, then Permittee may pay all light, heat, gas, power, garbage, water, sewer and janitorial service used in or on the Premises when due. In the event neither the Lessee nor the Permittee pay said utility or service charges, then the Permittor may terminate this Permit with ten (10) days notice. 6.2. Permittor shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by or resulting from any variation, interruption, or failure of said utility services due to any cause whatsoever; and no temporary interruption or failure of such services incident to the making of repairs, alterations or improvements, or due to accident, strike, act of God, or conditions or events not under Permittor's control, shall be deemed a breach of the Permit or as an eviction of Permittee, or relieve Permittee from any of its obligations hereunder. 7. PERMITTEE'S ACCEPTANCE OF PREMISES. By occupying the Premises, Permittee formally accepts the same in AS IS condition, and acknowledges that the Permittor has complied with all the requirements imposed upon it under the terms of this Permit with respect to the condition of the Premises at the commencement of this term. Permittee hereby accepts the premises subject to all applicable zoning, municipal, county and state laws, ordinances and regulations governing and regulating the use of the premises, and accepts this Permit subject thereto and to all matters disclosed thereby and by any exhibits attached hereto. Permittee acknowledges that neither Permittor nor Permittor's agent has made any representation or warranty as to the suitability of the Premises for the conduct of Permittee's business or use. Except as otherwise provided herein, Permittor warrants Permittee's right to peaceably and quietly enjoy the premises without any disturbance from Permittor, or others claiming by or through Permittor. 8. PURPOSE AND USE: 8.1. Use of Premises: The Premises are leased to the Permittee for the following described purpose: 8.1.1. Operation of an Aircraft Charter and Aircraft Taxi Service in accordance with the Airport Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards for the operation of this type of commercial aeronautic activity at the Renton Municipal Airport. 8.1.2. Operation of an Aircraft Maintenance and Repair facility in accordance with the Airport Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards for the operation of this type of commercial aeronautic activity at the Renton Municipal Airport. OPERATING PERMIT 4 City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. 8.2. Continuous Use: Permittee covenants that the premises shall be continuously used for those purposes during the term of the Permit, shall not be allowed to stand vacant or idle, and shall not be used for any other purpose without Permittoe's written consent first having been obtained. Consent of Permittor to other types of activities will not be unreasonably withheld. 8.3. Non -Aviation Uses Prohibited: Permittee agrees that, except as expressly provided above, the Premises may not be used for uses or activities that are not related, directly or indirectly, to aviation. 8.4. Signs: No advertising matter or signs shall be at any time displayed on the leased premises or structures without the written approval of Permittor, which will not be unreasonably withheld. One sign, of the type and dimensions specified by the Airport Manager, shall be permitted to be displayed on the Rainier and Airport Way entrance fences through the termination date of this permit. 8.5. Conformity with Rules: Permittee further covenants to keep and operate the Premises and all structures, improvements, and activities in conformity with all rules, regulations and laws now or hereafter adopted by Permittor, including the Airport Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards which are incorporated herein by this reference, the Federal Aviation Administration, the State Aeronautics Commission, or other duly constituted governmental authority, all at Permittee's cost and expense. 8.6. Waste, Nuisance, Illegal Activities: Permittee covenants that he will not permit any waste, damage, or injury to the Premises or improvements thereon, nor allow the maintenance of any nuisance thereon, nor the use thereof for any illegal purposes or activities. 8.7. Increased Insurance Risk: Permittee will not do or permit to be done in or about the premises anything which will be dangerous to life or limb, or which will increase any insurance rates upon the premises or other buildings and improvements. 9. HAZARDOUS WASTE: 9.1. Permittee's Representation and Warrant: In particular, Permittee represents and warrants to the Permittor that Permittee's use of the Premises will not involve the use of any hazardous substance (as defined by R.C.W. Chapter 70.105D, as amended), other than fuels, lubricants and other products which are customary and necessary for use in Permittee's ordinary course of business. 9.2. Standard of Care: Permittee agrees to use a high degree of care to be certain that no such hazardous substance is improperly used, released or disposed on the Premises during the term of this lease by Permittee, its agents or assigns, or is improperly used, released or disposed on the premises by the act of any third party. 9.3. Indemnity: The parties agree that Permittor shall have no responsibility to the Permittee, or any other third party, for remedial action under R.C.W. Chapter 70.105D, or other legislation, in the event of a release of or disposition of any such hazardous substance on, in, or at OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. the Premises, and not caused by Permittor, during the term of this Permit. Permittee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Permittor from any obligation or expense, including fees incurred by the Permittor for attorneys, consultants, engineers, damages, including environmental resource damages, etc., that are suffered or incurred due to the release or disposition of any such hazardous substance upon the Premises not caused by Permittor, during the term of this Permit, including remedial action under RCW 70.105D. 9.4. Dispute Resolution: In the event of any dispute between the parties concerning whether any release of or disposition of any such hazardous substance on, in or at the premises (a) occurred during the term of this lease, or (b) was caused by Permittor, the parties agree to submit the dispute for resolution by arbitration upon demand by either party. Each party shall select one (1) arbitrator. The two (2) selected arbitrators, if unable to agree upon an arbitration award within a period of thirty (30) days after such appointment, shall select a third arbitrator. The third arbitrator shall be an engineer with experience in the identification and remediation of hazardous substances. The arbitrators shall make their decision in writing within sixty (60) days after their appointment, unless the time is extended by the agreement of the parties. The decision of a majority of the arbitrators shall be final and binding upon the parties. Each party shall bear the cost of the arbitrator named by it. The expenses of the third arbitrator shall be borne by the parties equally. 10. MAINTENANCE: 10.1. Maintenance of Premises: The Premises and all of the improvements or structures thereon and authorized by the Permittor for use by the Permittee, shall be used and maintained by Permittee in an operable, neat, orderly, and sanitary manner. Permittor shall not be called upon to make any improvements, alteration, or repair of any kind upon the Premises. Permittee is responsible for the clean-up and proper disposal at reasonable and regular intervals of rubbish, trash, waste and leaves around the Premises, including that blown against fences bordering the Premises, whether as a result of the Permittee's activities or having been deposited upon the Premises from other areas. 10.2. Removal of Snow/Floodwater/Mud: Permittee shall be responsible for removal of snow and/or floodwaters or mud deposited there from the Premises and those areas of the Sublessor utilized by the Permittee, with the disposition thereof to be accomplished in such a manner so as to not interfere with or increase the maintenance activities of Permittor upon the public areas of the Airport. 10.3. Permittor May Perform Maintenance: If Permittee fails to perform Permittee's obligations under this Paragraph, Permittor may at its option (but shall not be required to) enter the Premises, after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to Permittee, and put the same in good order, condition and repair, and the cost thereof together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve (12%) percent per annum shall become due and payable as additional rental to Permittor together with Permittee's next rental installment. OPERATING PERMIT 6 City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. 11. ALTERATIONS. 11.1. Protection from Liens: Before commencing any work relating to alterations, additions and improvements affecting the Premises, Permittee shall notify Permittor in writing of the expected date of commencement thereof. Permittor shall then have the right at any time and from time to time to post and maintain on the Premises such notices as Permittor reasonably deems necessary to protect the Premises and Permittor from mechanics' liens, materialmen's liens or any other liens. In any event, Permittee shall pay when due, or bond around, all claims for labor or materials furnished to or for Pennittee at or for use in the Premises. Permittee shall not permit any mechanics' or materialmen's liens to be levied against the Premises for any labor or material furnished to Permittee or claimed to have been furnished to Permittee or to Permittee's agents or contractors in connection with work of any character performed or claimed to have been performed on the Premises by or at the direction of Permittee. 11.2. Bond: At any time Permittee either desires to or is required to make any repairs, alterations, additions, improvements or utility installation thereon, or otherwise, Permittor may at its sole option require Permittee, at Permittee's sole cost and expense, to obtain and provide to Permittor a lien and completion bond in an amount equal to one and one-half (1-1/2) times the estimated cost of such improvements, to insure Permittor against liability for mechanics and materialmen's liens and to insure completion of the work. 11.3. Permittor May Make Improvements: Permittee agrees that Permittor, at its option, may at its own expense make repairs, alterations or improvements which Permittor may deem necessary or advisable for the preservation, safety or improvement of the Premises or improvements located thereon, if any. 11.4. Notification of Completion: Upon completion of capital improvements made on the Premises, it is the Permittee's responsibility to promptly notify Permittor of such completion. 12. ASSIGNMENT: 12.1. Assignment/Subletting: The sublease or any part thereof shall not be assigned by Permittee, by operation of law or otherwise, nor shall the premises or any part thereof be sublet without the prior written consent of Permittor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. If Permittee is a corporation, the transfer of a majority of Permittee's stock shall constitute an assignment for purposes of this paragraph. 12.2. No Release of Permittee's Liability: No assignment of this leasehold interest shall release Permittee from the obligation to pay the rent and to perform all other obligations to be performed by Permittee under the terms of its sublease. No assignment shall so release Permittee unless Permittor's consent is obtained pursuant to Paragraph 12.1. In the event that Permittor's consent to assignment is so obtained, Permittee shall be relieved of all liability arising from this permit and arising out of any act, occurrence or omission occurring after Permittor's consent is obtained. The Permittee's assignee must assume and agree to carry out all of the obligations of Permittee under this permit. OPERATING PERMIT 7 City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. 13. DEFAULT: 13.1. Definition: It shall be a default of this Permit if the Permittee fails to comply with any of the statutes, ordinances, rules, orders, regulations, and requirements of the federal, state, and/or city governments, any terms of this Permit and/or the underlying lease. 13.2 Action Upon Notice of Default: 13.2.1 In the event of default as provided above, the Permittor may, if it so elects, at any time thereafter, terminate this permit and the term hereof, on giving to the Permittee thirty (30) days notice (Notice of Default), in writing, of the Permittor's intention to terminate the Permit. 13.2.2. Alternatively, the Permittor may allow the Permittee to cure the default within thirty (30) days or, within that time, provide adequate assurance of future ability to cure the default. Adequate assurance shall include, but not be limited to, a deposit in escrow, a guarantee by a third party acceptable to Permittor, a surety bond, or a letter of credit. The default must be cured within ninety (90) days of the notice of default. 13.3. Termination of Permit: Upon the expiration of either of the notice periods specified in Paragraph 13.2 above, and if the event causing the default is not corrected in a timely manner, this permit and the term hereof, together with any and all other rights and options of Permittee herein specified, shall expire and come to an end on the day fixed in such notice. 13.4. No Waiver of Remedies: In the event of default by Permittee, the Permittor may choose not to pursue a claim against Permittee. Such decision will not operate as a waiver of any other remedies or claims then available to the Permittor or those that may become available. 14. BINDING AGREEMENT: Subject to the restriction upon assignment or subletting as set forth herein, all of the terms, conditions, and provisions of this Permit shall be binding upon the parties, their successors and assigns, and in the case of a Permittee who is a natural person, his or her personal representative and heirs. 15. RIGHT OF INSPECTION. Permittee will allow Permittor, or Permittor's agent, free access to the Premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspection, or for making repairs, additions or alterations to the Premises, or any property owned by or under the control of Permittor. 16. SURRENDER OF PREMISES: Permittee shall quit and surrender the premises at the end of the term in a condition as good as the reasonable use thereof would permit, normal wear and tear excepted. Alterations, additions or improvements which may be made by either of the parties hereto on the Premises, except movable office furniture or trade fixtures put in at the expense of Permittee, shall be and remain the property of the Permittor and shall remain on and be surrendered with the Premises as a part thereof at the termination of this lease without hindrance, molestation, or injury. Permittee shall repair at its sole expense any damage to the Premises occasioned by its use thereof, or by the removal of Permittee's trade fixtures, OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. furnishings and equipment which repair shall include the patching and filling of holes and repair of structural damage. 17. INSURANCE: 17.1. Personal Property: It is agreed that Permittor shall not be held liable in any manner for, or on account of, any loss or damage to personal property of the Permittee, Permittee's invitees or other persons, which may be sustained by fire or water or other insured peril, or for the loss of any articles by burglary, theft or any other cause from or upon the Premises. It is acknowledged that Permittor does not cover any of the personal property of Permittee, Permittee's invitees or other persons upon the Premises through its insurance. Permittee, its invitees and other persons upon the Premises are solely responsible to obtain suitable personal property insurance. 17.2. Liability_ Insurance. The Permittee agrees to maintain, in force, during the term of this Permit a policy of comprehensive public liability and property damage insurance written by a company authorized to do business in the State of Washington against any liability arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the Premises and all areas appurtenant thereto. The limits of liability shall be in an amount of not less than $1,000,000.00 for injury to or death of one person in any one accident or occurrence and in an amount of not less than $1,000,000.00 for injury to or death of more than one person in any one accident or occurrence, and of not less than $1,000,000.00 for property damage. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Permittee hereunder. The insurance policy shall have a Landlord's Protective Liability endorsement attached thereto. 17.3. Insurance Policies: Insurance required hereunder shall be written in companies acceptable to Permittor and rated A-10 or better in "Best's Insurance Guides". Coverages shall be submitted on forms prescribed by Permittor. Prior to possession, the Permittee shall deliver to Permittor copies of policies of such insurance acquired by Permittee, or certificates evidencing the existence and amounts of such insurance, with loss payable clauses satisfactory to Permittor. Permittor shall be named as an additional insured. No such policy shall be cancelable or subject to reduction of coverage or other modification except after forty-five (45) days' prior written notice to Permittor. Permittee shall, not less than forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration of such policies, furnish Permittor with renewals or "binders" therefore. Permittee shall not do or permit to be done anything which shall invalidate the insurance policies referred to above. Permittee shall forthwith, upon Permittor's demand, reimburse Permittor for any additional premiums attributable to any act or omission or operation of Permittee causing such increase in the cost of insurance. If the Permittee shall fail to procure and maintain said insurance the Permittor may, but shall not be required to, procure and maintain the same, but at the expense of Permittee. 18. LIMITATION UPON PERMITTOR'S LIABILITY. Permittor shall not be liable for any damage to property or persons caused by, or arising out of (a) any defect in or the maintenance or use of the Premises, or the improvements, fixtures and appurtenances of which the premises constitute a part; or (b) water coming from the roof, water pipes, flooding of the OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. Cedar River or other body of water, or from any other source whatsoever, whether within or without the Premises; or (c) any act or omission of any Permittee or other occupants of the building, or their agents, servants, employees or invitees thereof. 19. INDEMNITY: Permittee covenants to indemnify and save harmless Permittor against any and all claims arising from the conduct and management of or from any work or thing whatsoever done in or about the Premises or the improvements or equipment thereon during the lease term, or arising from any act or negligence of the Permittee or any of its agents, contractors, patrons, customers, or employees, or arising from any accident, injury, or damage whatsoever, however caused, to any person or persons, or to the property of any person, persons, corporation or other entity occurring during the lease term on, in, or about the Premises, and from and against all costs, attorney's fees, expenses, and liabilities incurred in or from any such claims or any action or proceeding brought against the Permittor by reason of any such claim, except such claims arising directly or indirectly out of Permittor's sole act or omission. Permittee, on notice from Permittor, shall resist or defend such action or proceeding forthwith. 20. HOLDING OVER: Permittee understands that upon expiration of the term of this permit, Permittee must execute a new permit with the Permittor as a condition to remaining on the premises. Permittee further understands that if, without execution of any extension or renewal of this permit, Permittee should remain in possession of the premises after expiration or termination of the term of this permit, notwithstanding any extension of its sublease with Lessee, then the Lessee shall be in default of its lease, LAG 03-002, and Permittor may evict the Lessee and the Permittee. All the conditions, terms and provisions of this permit shall be applicable during such holding over. 21. NO WAIVER: It is further covenanted and agreed between the parties hereto that no waiver by Permittor of a breach by Permittee of any covenant, agreement, stipulation, or condition of this lease shall be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same covenant, agreement, stipulation, or condition, or a breach of any other covenant agreement, stipulation, or condition. 22. NOTICES: All notices under this lease shall be in writing and delivered in person, with receipt therefore, or sent by certified mail, to the following addresses: a) For the City of Renton: b) For the Permittee: Airport Manager WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. 616 West Perimeter Road 800 West Perimeter Road Renton, Washington 98055 Renton, WA 98055 23. DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED: 23.1. Discrimination Prohibited: Permittee covenants and agrees not to discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, or any other class of person protected by Federal or State law or the Renton City Code, in the use of any OPERATING PERMIT 10 City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. of its facilities provided for the public in the Airport. Permittee further agrees to furnish services on a fair, equal and not unjustly discriminatory basis to all users thereof, and to charge on a fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory basis for each unit of service; provided that Permittee may make reasonable and non-discriminatory discounts, rebates, or other similar types of price reductions to volume purchasers. 23.2. Minority Business Enterprise Policy: It is the policy of the Department of Transportation that minority business enterprises as defined in 49 C.F.R. Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of leases as defined in 49 C.F.R. 23.5. Consequently, this lease is subject to 49 C.F.R. Part 23, as applicable. No person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or otherwise discriminated against in connection with the award and performance of any contract, including leases covered by 49 C.F.R. Part 23, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex. 23.3. Application to Sub -leases: Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 12 of this Permit, Permittee agrees that it will include the above clause in all assignments of this lease or sub -leases, and cause its assignee(s) and sub-lessee(s) to similarly include the above clause in further assignments or sub -leases. 24. FORCE MAJEURE: In the event that either party hereto shall be delayed or hindered in or prevented from the performance of any act required hereunder by reason of strikes, lockouts, labor troubles, inability to procure materials, failure of power, restrictive governmental laws or regulations, riots, insurrections, war, or other reason of like nature not the fault of the party delayed in performing work or doing acts required under the terms of this Lease, then performance of such act shall be extended for a period equivalent to the period of such delay. The provisions of this paragraph shall not, however, operate to excuse Permittee from the prompt payment of rent, or any other payment required by the terms of this Permit, to be made by Permittee. 25. CAPTIONS: Article and paragraph captions are not a part hereof. 26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Permit contains all agreements of the parties with respect to any matter mentioned herein. No prior agreement or understanding pertaining to any such matter shall be effective. This Permit may be modified in writing only, signed by the parties in interest at the time of the modification. In the event of conflict between the terms of this Permit and the sublease agreement between Permittee and Lessee, the terms of this Permit supersede. 27. CUMULATIVE REMEDIES: No remedy or election hereunder shall be deemed exclusive, but shall, wherever possible, be cumulative with all other remedies at law or in equity. 28. CORPORATE AUTHORITY: If Permittee is a corporation, each individual executing this Lease on behalf of said corporation represents and warrants that he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Permit on behalf of said corporation in accordance with a duly adopted resolution of the Board of Directors of said corporation and in accordance with the OPERATING PERMIT 11 City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. Bylaws of said corporation, and that this Permit is binding upon said corporation in accordance with its terms. 29. TRANSFER OF PREMISES BY PERMITTOR: In the event of any sale, conveyance, transfer or assignment by Permittor of its interest in the Premises, Permittor shall be relieved of all liability arising from this Permit and arising out of any act, occurrence or omission occurring after the consummation of such sale, conveyance, transfer or assignment. PERMITTEE: WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. a Washington corporation By Michael O'Leary its: Owner/President Date: OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. PERMITTOR: THE CITY OF RENTON a Washington municipal corporation Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor Date: ATTEST: By Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Date: Approved as to legal form: City Attorney 12 LEASE AGREEMENT AirO, Inc. OFFICE/ HANGER LEASE This Lease Agreement (this "Lease") is dated January 1, 2004, by and between Michael O'Leary ("Landlord for AirO), and WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. ("Tenant"). The parties agree as follows: PREMISES. Landlord, in consideration of the lease payments provided in this Lease, leases to Tenant shared office/hanger space in the building and shared ramp space on the west side of Renton Municipal Airport. (the "Premises") located at 800 West Perimeter Road, Renton, King County, Washington 98055. TERM. The lease term will begin on January 1, 2004, and will terminate on December 31, 2004, and will be automatically renewable in one year increments if mutually agreed upon, up to a total of 10 years. Lessor or Lessee has the right to renegotiate terms in the month of December prior to automatic renewal. LEASE PAYMENTS. Tenant shall pay to Landlord monthly installments of $4500.00, payable in advance on the first day of each month. This payment is for the aircraft owned by WorldWind Helicopters. WorldWind will pay $1250.00 a month for additional leased aircraft stored on the premises. Payments shall be made to the Landlord at 800 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98055, which address may be changed from time to time by the Landlord. DESCRIPTION OF SUBLEASED AREAS. Aircraft can be parked anywhere within the hanger general area. Other common areas include: lobby, flight planning room, conference room, restrooms, and the use of the ramp area. POSSESSION. Tenant shall be entitled to possession on the first day of the term of this Lease, and shall yield possession to Landlord on the last day of the term of this Lease, unless otherwise agreed by both parties in writing. At the expiration of the term, Tenant shall remove its goods and effects and peaceable yield up the Premises to Landlord in as good a condition as when delivered to Tenant, ordinary wear and tear excepted. PURPOSE AND USE. Use of Premises: The Premises are leased to the Permittee for the following described purposes: ■ The operation of an Aircraft charter and Aircraft Taxi Service in accordance with the Minimum Standards for the operation of this type of commercial aeronautic activity at the Renton Municipal Airport • The operation of Aircraft Maintenance and Repair, in accordance with the minimum Standards for the operation of this type of commercial aeronautic activity at the Renton Municipal Airport. Continuous Use: Permittee covenants that the premises shall be continuously used for those purposes during the term of the Permit, shall not be allowed to stand vacant or idle, and condition of this lease shall be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same covenant, agreement, stipulation, or condition, or a breach of any other covenant agreement, stipulation, or condition. PARKING. Tenant shall be entitled to parking privileges associated with the building. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Tenant shall maintain liability insurance on the Premises with personal injury limits of at least $1,000,000.00 for injury to one person, and $1,000,000.00 for any one accident, and a limit of at least $1,000,000.00 for damage to property per terms of the Airport Operating Permit and Agreement with the City of Renton. Tenant shall deliver appropriate evidence to Landlord as proof that adequate insurance is in force issued by companies reasonably satisfactory to Landlord. Landlord shall receive advance written notice from the insurer prior to any termination of such insurance policies. Tenant shall also maintain any other insurance which Landlord may reasonably require for the protection of Landlord's interest in the Premises. Tenant is responsible for maintaining casualty insurance for its own property. MAINTENANCE. Tenant shall have the responsibility to maintain the Premises in good repair at all times during the term of this Lease. UTILITIES AND SERVICES. Landlord will pay water, sewer, power, gas, and garbage. Any other services that the tenant requires will be there sole responsibility. TERMINATION. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Lease, Landlord may terminate this lease upon 90 days' written notice to Tenant. DEFAULTS. Tenant shall be in default of this Lease if Tenant fails to fulfill any lease obligation or term by which Tenant is bound. Subject to any governing provisions of law to the contrary, if Tenant fails to cure any financial obligation within 30 days (or any other obligation within 30 days) after written notice of such default is provided by Landlord to Tenant, Landlord may take possession of the Premises without further notice (to the extend permitted by law), and without prejudicing Landlord's rights to damages. In the alternative, Landlord may elect to cure any default and the cost of such action shall be added to Tenant's financial obligations under this Lease shall be additional rent, whether or not such sums or charges are designated as "additional rent". The rights provided by this paragraph are cumulative in nature and are in addition to any other rights afforded by law. HOLDOVER If Tenant maintains possession of the Premises for any period after the termination of this Lease ("Holdover Period"), Tenant shall pay to Landlord lease payment(s) during the Holdover Period at a rate equal to the most recent rate preceding the Holdover Period. Such holdover shall constitute a month -to -month extension of this Lease only if terms of payment due. CUMULATIVE RIGHTS. The rights of the parties under this Lease are cumulative, and shall not be construed as exclusive unless otherwise required by law. REMODELING OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS. Tenant shall have the obligation to conduct any construction or remodeling (at Tenant's expense) that may be required to use the Premises as specified above. Tenant may also construct such fixtures on the Premises (at Tenant's expense) that appropriately facilitate its use for such purposes. Such construction shall be undertaken and such fixtures maybe erected on with prior written consent to of the Landlord, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Tenant shall not install awnings or advertisements on any part of the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent. At the end of the lease term, Tenant shall be entitled to remove (or at the request of Landlord shall remove) such fixtures, and shall restore the Premises to substantially the same condition of the Premises at the commencement of this Lease. ACCESS BY LANDLORD TO PREMISES. Subject to Tenant's consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld), Landlord shall have the right to enter the Premises to make inspections, provide necessary services, or show the unit to prospective tenants or workers. However, Landlord does not assume any liability for the care or supervision of the Premises. As provided by law, in the case of an emergency, Landlord may enter the Premises without Tenant's consent. During the last three months of this Lease, or any extension of this Lease, Landlord shall be allowed to display the usual "To Let" signs and show the Premises to prospective tenants. INDEMNITY REGARDING USE OF PREMISES. To the extent permitted by law, Tenant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Landlord from and against any and all losses, claims, liabilities, and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, if any, misuse of the Premises, except Landlord's act or negligence. DANGEROUS MATERIALS. Tenant shall not keep or have on the Premises any article or thing of a dangerous, flammable, or explosive character that might substantially increase the danger of fire on the Premises, or that might be considered hazardous by a responsible insurance company, unless the prior written consent of Landlord is obtained and proof of adequate insurance protection is provided by Tenant to Landlord. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS. Tenant shall promptly comply with all laws, ordinances, requirements and regulations of the federal, state, county, municipal and other authorities, and the fire insurance underwriters. However, Tenant shall not by this provision be required to make alterations to the exterior of the building or alterations of the structural nature. ARBITRATION. Any controversy or claim relating to this contract, including the construction or application of this contract, will be settled by binding arbitration under the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and any judgment granted by the arbitrator(s) may be enforced in any court of proper jurisdiction. ASSIGNABILITY/SUBLETTING. Tenant may not assign or sublease any interest in the Premises, nor effect a change in the majority ownership of the Tenant (from the ownership existing at the inception of this lease), nor assign, mortgage or pledge this Lease, without the prior written consent of Landlord, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. DISCRIMINATION. Discrimination Prohibited — Lessee covenants and agrees not to discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of race, color, creed, sex or national origin in the use of any of its facilities provided for the public on the Airport. Lessee further agrees to furnish services on a fair, equal and not unjustly discriminatory basis to all users thereof, and to charge of a fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory basis to all users thereof, and to charge on a fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory basis for each unit of service: provided that Lessee may make reasonable and not -discriminatory discounts, rebates, or other similar types of price reductions to volume purchasers. NOTICE. Notices under this Lease shall not be deemed valid unless given or served in writing and forwarded by mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: LANDLORD: AirO, c/o Michael O'Leary 800 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 TENANT: WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. 800 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 Such addresses may be changed from time to time by either party by providing notice as set fourth above. Notices mailed in accordance with the above provisions shall be deemed received on the third day after posting. GOVERNING LAW. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington ENTIRE AGREEMENT/AMENDMENT. This Lease Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and there are no other promises, conditions, understandings or other agreements, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter of this Lease. This Lease may be modified or amended in writing, if the writing is signed by the party obligated under the amendment. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Lease shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and enforceable. If a court finds that any provisions shall continue to be valid and enforceable. If a court find that nay provision of this Lease is invalid or unenforceable, but that by limiting such provisions, it would become valid and enforceable, then such provision shall be deemed to be written, construed, and enforced as so limited. WAIVER. The failure of either party to enforce any provisions of this Lease shall not be construed as a waiver or limitation of that party's right to subsequently enforce and compel strict compliance with every provision of this Lease. BINDING EFFECT. The provisions of this lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of both parties and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns. LANDLORD: AirO, Inc. Michael J. O'Le, Owner/President' TENANT: WorldWind Helicopters, Inc. LOM January 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept/Div/Board.. Transportation Division Staff Contact...... Ryan Zulauf, x7471 Subject: Operating Permit and Agreement with Aero-Copters, Inc. Exhibits: Issue Paper Operating Permit and Agreement Sublease Agreement Al k: For Agenda of: June 20, 2005 Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing.. Correspondence. . Ordinance ............. Resolution........... . Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions...... Information........ . X Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Transportation/Aviation Committee Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: N/A Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Approval is requested for an Operating Permit and Agreement with Aero-Copters, Inc. Aero- Copters, Inc. has been subleasing hangar space from AirO, Inc. in the 800 Building on the west side of the Airport since January 2004. The purpose of Aero-Copter's sublease is to provide aircraft maintenance and repair services to AirO, Inc. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of an Operating Permit and Agreement with Aero-Copters, Inc. and their sublease with AirO, Inc. II:AAIR\Projects\7'asks\Agenda Bills\AgBill Aero-Copters sublease wAirO_doc CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: June 7, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler FROM: Gregg Zimmerma&Ainistrator Planning/Building/Public Works STAFF CONTACT: Ryan Zulauf, Airport Manager ( x7471) SUBJECT: Operating Permit and Agreement with Aero-Copters, Inc. ISSUE: Approval is requested for an Operating Permit and Agreement with Aero-Copters, Inc. for their sublease from AirO, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of an Operating Permit and Agreement with Aero-Copters, Inc. and their sublease with AirO, Inc. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Aero-Copters, Inc. has been subleasing hangar space from AirO, Inc. in the 800 Building on the west side of the Airport since January 2004. Aero-Copters, Inc. subleases building space from AirO, Inc. for the purpose of providing aircraft maintenance and repair services to AirO, Inc. This purpose of use is consistent with the Purpose of Use section of AirO, Inc.'s lease agreement, LAG 03-002. Aero-Copters, Inc. and WorldWind Helicopters are both owned by Mike O'Leary, owner of AirO, Inc. AirO, Inc. has had a lease agreement, LAG 03-002, with the City since November 1, 2003, for the purpose of operating an aircraft charter/taxi service and aircraft maintenance and repair facility. AirO, Inc.'s lease will continue until November 1, 2013. H:FileSys/Air/Projects/Tasks/Agenda Bills/Iss paper worldwind helic sublease wAirO.doc PAG OPERATING PERMIT AND AGREEMENT between the City of Renton and Aero-Copters, Inc. THIS IS A PERMIT TO OPERATE AN AVIATION RELATED ACTIVITY UPON THE RENTON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AND AN AGREEMENT between THE CITY OF RENTON, a Washington municipal corporation ("Permittor"), and Aero-Copters, Inc., a Washington corporation ("Permittee"). IN CONSIDERATION of the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SUB -LEASE: 1.1. Pursuant to lease agreement LAG 03-002, executed on November 1, 2003, the City of Renton (Permittor) granted a lease of the subject premises to AirO, Inc., as Lessee, for the purpose of operating a Fixed Based Operation, which includes the sale of jet fuel and avgas, aircraft maintenance and repair, aircraft storage and air taxi/charter services.. 1.2. Thereafter, AirO, Inc. (Lessee) sublet the subject premises toAero-Copters, Inc., (Permittee) by sublease agreement, executed on January 1, 2004, for the purpose of operating an air taxi/charter business and an aircraft repair and maintenance facility for the benefit of the public, located at 800 West Perimeter Road, Renton, Washington. 2. GRANT OF OPERATING PERMIT: 2.1. Description of Premises: The premises leased by Aero-Copters, Inc., the Permittee, is described in the sub -lease as: 2.1.1. Interior Space: Shared use of the lobby, flight planning room, conference room and restrooms. 2.1.2. Hangar Space: Shared use of the hangar building located at 800 West Perimeter Road. These two (2) categories (Paragraph 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 above) of the property, being subleased by AirO, Inc. to Aero-Copters, Inc., shall hereafter be referred to as the "Premises". 3. CONDITIONS: 3.1. Specific Conditions: This grant of an Operating Permit is subject to the following: 3.1.1. Easements, restrictions and reservations of record and as further set forth herein; ORIGINAL OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. 3.1.2. Such rules and regulations as now exist or may hereafter be promulgated by the Permittor from time to time, including the Airport's Minimum Standards which are incorporated herein by this reference, and Permittor's standards concerning operation of public aviation service activities from the Airport; and 3.1.3. All such non-discriminatory charges and fees for such use as may be established from time to time by Permittor; and 3.1.4. TOGETHER WITH the privilege of Permittee to use the public portion of the Airport, including runway and other public facilities provided thereon, on a non-exclusive basis. 3.2. No Conveyance of Airport: This Operating Permit and Agreement shall in no way be deemed to be a conveyance of the Airport, and shall not be construed as providing any special privilege for any public portion of the Airport except as described herein. The Permittor reserves the right to lease or permit the use of any portion of the Airport for any purpose deemed suitable for the Airport, except that portion that is permitted hereby. 3.3. Nature of Permittor's Interest: It is expressly understood and agreed that Permittor holds and operates the Airport, and the Premises under and subject to a grant and conveyance thereof to Permittor from the United States of America, acting through its Reconstruction Finance Corporation, and subject to all the reservations, restrictions, rights, conditions, and exceptions of the United States therein and thereunder, which grant and conveyance has been filed for record in the office of the Recorder of King County, Washington, and recorded in Volume 2668 of Deeds, Page 386; and further that Permittor holds and operates said airport and premises under and subject to the State Aeronautics Acts of the State of Washington (chapter 165, laws of 1947), and any subsequent amendments thereof or subsequent legislation of said state and all rules and regulations lawfully promulgated under any act or legislation adopted by the State of Washington or by the United States or the Federal Aviation Administration. It is expressly agreed that the Permittee also accepts and will hold and use this lease and the Premises subject thereto and to all contingencies, risks, and eventualities of or arising out of the foregoing, and if this lease or the period thereof or any terms or provisions thereof be or become in conflict with or impaired or defeated by any such legislation, rules, regulations, contingencies or risks, the latter shall control and, if necessary, modify or supersede any provision of this lease affected thereby, all without any liability on the part of or recourse against the Permittor in favor of Permittee, provided that Permittor does not exceed its authority under the foregoing legislation, rules and regulations. 3.4. Future Development/Funding: Nothing contained in this lease shall operate or be construed to prevent or hinder the future development, improvements, or operation of Airport by Permittor, its agents, successors or assigns, or any department or agency of the State of Washington or of the United States, or the consummation of any loan or grant of federal or state funds in aid of the development, improvement, or operation of the Renton Airport. OPERATING PERMIT 2 City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. 4. TERM OF LEASE, SUBLEASE AND OPERATING PERMIT: 4.1. Permit Term: The term of this Operating Permit is one (1) year and maybe extended to include any Extended Term as may be in effect between AirO, Inc. and Aero- Copters, Inc.. After the Initial Term, the Extended Term of the sublease is on a year-to-year basis, for a period of ten (10) years, ending on January 1, 2014. Any extension of the Initial Term of this Operating Permit is only renewable upon written notice received by theCity ninety (90) calendar days in advance of the termination date of the Initial or Extended Term of this Operating Permit and Agreement. In no event will the term of the Operating Permit and Agreement be extended beyond November 1, 2018. 5. RENTAL: 5.1. Rent on lease: As rental for the premises described in LAG 03-002 and addenda thereto, Lessee has agreed to pay Permittor a monthly rental in the sum of Four Thousand Six Hundred Ninety -Five Dollars and Ninety -Two Cents ($4,695.92) throughout the twelve (12) month period commencing on November 1, 2003, which does not include leasehold excise tax. 5.2. Rent on sublease: As rental for the premises described in Section 2, above, during the term of this permit, Permittee has agreed to pay AirO, Inc. a monthly rental in the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500) throughout the twelve (12) month period commencing on January 1, 2004. In the event Lessee fails to pay the rent identified in Paragraph 5.1., then Permittee may, whether Permittee subleases all or part of Lessee's Airport leasehold interest as described in LAG 03-002 and addenda thereto, pay said rent, when due. In the event neither the Lessee nor Permittee pay said rent, then the Permittor may terminate this permit with ten (10) days notice. 5.3. Other Charges: Permittee further agrees to pay, in addition to the rental specified and other charges hereinabove defined, all fees and charges now in effect or hereafter levied or established by Permittor, or its successors, or by any other governmental agency or authority, being or becoming levied or charged against the premises, structures, business operations, or activities conducted by or use made by Permittee of, on, and from the leased premises which shall include, but not be limited to, all charges for light, heat, gas, power, garbage, water and other utilities or services rendered to said premises. 5.4. Leasehold Excise Tax: In the event that the State of Washington or any other governmental authority having jurisdiction thereover shall hereafter levy or impose any similar tax or charge on the leasehold estate described herein, and Lessee fails to pay said tax or charge, then Permittee may, whether Permittee subleases all or part of Lessee's Airport leasehold interest as described in LAG 03-002 and addenda thereto, pay said tax or charge, when due. Such tax or charge shall be in addition to the regular monthly rentals. In the event neither the Lessee nor Permittee pay said tax or charge, then the Permittor may terminate this permit with ten (10) days notice. OPERATING PERMIT 3 City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. 6. PAYMENT OF UTILITIES AND RELATED SERVICES. 6.1. Whether Permittee subleases all or part of Lessee's Airport leasehold interest as described in LAG 03-002 and addenda, if Lessee fails to pay such utilities and service charges, then Permittee may pay all light, heat, gas, power, garbage, water, sewer and janitorial service used in or on the Premises when due. In the event neither the Lessee nor the Permittee pay said utility or service charges, then the Permittor may terminate this Permit with ten (10) days notice. 6.2. Permittor shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused by or resulting from any variation, interruption, or failure of said utility services due to any cause whatsoever; and no temporary interruption or failure of such services incident to the making of repairs, alterations or improvements, or due to accident, strike, act of God, or conditions or events not under Permittor's control, shall be deemed a breach of the Permit or as an eviction of Permittee, or relieve Permittee from any of its obligations hereunder. 7. PERMITTEE'S ACCEPTANCE OF PREMISES. By occupying the Premises, Permittee formally accepts the same in AS IS condition, and acknowledges that the Permittor has complied with all the requirements imposed upon it under the terms of this Permit with respect to the condition of the Premises at the commencement of this term. Permittee hereby accepts the premises subject to all applicable zoning, municipal, county and state laws, ordinances and regulations governing and regulating the use of the premises, and accepts this Permit subject thereto and to all matters disclosed thereby and by any exhibits attached hereto. Permittee acknowledges that neither Permittor nor Permittor's agent has made any representation or warranty as to the suitability of the Premises for the conduct of Permittee's business or use. Except as otherwise provided herein, Permittor warrants Permittee's right to peaceably and quietly enjoy the premises without any disturbance from Permittor, or others claiming by or through Permittor. 8. PURPOSE AND USE: 8.1. Use of Premises: The Premises are leased to the Permittee for the following described purpose: 8.1.1. Operation of an Aircraft Charter and Aircraft Taxi Service in accordance with the Airport Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards for the operation of this type of commercial aeronautic activity at the Renton Municipal Airport. 8.1.2. Operation of an Aircraft Maintenance and Repair facility in accordance with the Airport Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards for the operation of this type of commercial aeronautic activity at the Renton Municipal Airport. 8.2. Continuous Use: Permittee covenants that the premises shall be continuously used for those purposes during the term of the Permit, shall not be allowed to stand vacant or idle, and shall not be used for any other purpose without Permittor's written consent first having been obtained. Consent of Permittor to other types of activities will not be unreasonably withheld. OPERATING PERMIT 4 City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. 8.3. Non -Aviation Uses Prohibited: Permittee agrees that, except as expressly provided above, the Premises may not be used for uses or activities that are not related, directly or indirectly, to aviation. 8.4. Signs: No advertising matter or signs shall be at any time displayed on the leased premises or structures without the written approval of Permittor, which will not be unreasonably withheld. One sign, of the type and dimensions specified by the Airport Manager, shall be permitted to be displayed on the Rainier and Airport Way entrance fences through the termination date of this permit. 8.5. Conformity with Rules: Permittee further covenants to keep and operate the Premises and all structures, improvements, and activities in conformity with all rules, regulations and laws now or hereafter adopted by Permittor, including the Airport Rules and Regulations and Minimum Standards which are incorporated herein by this reference, the Federal Aviation Administration, the State Aeronautics Commission, or other duly constituted governmental authority, all at Permittee's cost and expense. 8.6. Waste, Nuisance, Illegal Activities: Permittee covenants that he will not permit any waste, damage, or injury to the Premises or improvements thereon, nor allow the maintenance of any nuisance thereon, nor the use thereof for any illegal purposes or activities. 8.7. Increased Insurance Risk: Permittee will not do or permit to be done in or about the premises anything which will be dangerous to life or limb, or which will increase any insurance rates upon the premises or other buildings and improvements. 9. HAZARDOUS WASTE: 9.1. Permittee's Representation and Warranty: In particular, Permittee represents and warrants to the Permittor that Permittee's use of the Premises will not involve the use of any hazardous substance (as defined by R.C.W. Chapter 70.105D, as amended), other than fuels, lubricants and other products which are customary and necessary for use in Permittee's ordinary course of business. 9.2. Standard of Care: Permittee agrees to use a high degree of care to be certain that no such hazardous substance is improperly used, released or disposed on the Premises during the term of this lease by Permittee, its agents or assigns, or is improperly used, released or disposed on the premises by the act of any third party. 9.3. Indemnity: The parties agree that Permittor shall have no responsibility to the Permittee, or any other third party, for remedial action under R.C.W. Chapter 70.105D, or other legislation, in the event of a release of or disposition of any such hazardous substance on, in, or at the Premises, and not caused by Permittor, during the term of this Permit. Permittee agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Permittor from any obligation or expense, including fees incurred by the Permittor for attorneys, consultants, engineers, damages, including environmental resource damages, etc., that are suffered or incurred due to the release or disposition of any such OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. hazardous substance upon the Premises not caused by Permittor, during the term of this Permit, including remedial action under RCW 70.105D. 9.4. Dispute Resolution: In the event of any dispute between the parties concerning whether any release of or disposition of any such hazardous substance on, in or at the premises (a) occurred during the term of this lease, or (b) was caused by Permittor, the parties agree to submit the dispute for resolution by arbitration upon demand by either party. Each party shall select one (1) arbitrator. The two (2) selected arbitrators, if unable to agree upon an arbitration award within a period of thirty (30) days after such appointment, shall select a third arbitrator. The third arbitrator shall be an engineer with experience in the identification and remediation of hazardous substances. The arbitrators shall make their decision in writing within sixty (60) days after their appointment, unless the time is extended by the agreement of the parties. The decision of a majority of the arbitrators shall be final and binding upon the parties. Each party shall bear the cost of the arbitrator named by it. The expenses of the third arbitrator shall be borne by the parties equally. 10. MAINTENANCE: 10.1. Maintenance of Premises: The Premises and all of the improvements or structures thereon and authorized by the Permittor for use by the Permittee, shall be used and maintained by Permittee in an operable, neat, orderly, and sanitary manner. Permittor shall not be called upon to make any improvements, alteration, or repair of any kind upon the Premises. Permittee is responsible for the clean-up and proper disposal at reasonable and regular intervals of rubbish, trash, waste and leaves around the Premises, including that blown against fences bordering the Premises, whether as a result of the Permittee's activities or having been deposited upon the Premises from other areas. 10.2. Removal of Snow/Floodwater/Mud: Permittee shall be responsible for removal of snow and/or floodwaters or mud deposited there from the Premises and those areas of the Sublessor utilized by the Permittee, with the disposition thereof to be accomplished in such a manner so as to not interfere with or increase the maintenance activities of Permittor upon the public areas of the Airport. 10.3. Permittor MU Perform Maintenance: If Permittee fails to perform Permittee's obligations under this Paragraph, Permittor may at its option (but shall not be required to) enter the Premises, after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to Permittee, and put the same in good order, condition and repair, and the cost thereof together with interest thereon at the rate of twelve (12%) percent per annum shall become due and payable as additional rental to Permittor together with Permittee's next rental installment. 11. ALTERATIONS. 11.1. Protection from Liens: Before commencing any work relating to alterations, additions and improvements affecting the Premises, Permittee shall notify Permittor in writing of the expected date of commencement thereof. Permittor shall then have the right at any time and from time to time to post and maintain on the Premises such notices as Permittor reasonably OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. deems necessary to protect the Premises and Permittor from mechanics' liens, materialmen's liens or any other liens. In any event, Permittee shall pay when due, or bond around, all claims for labor or materials furnished to or for Permittee at or for use in the Premises. Permittee shall not permit any mechanics' or materialmen's liens to be levied against the Premises for any labor or material furnished to Permittee or claimed to have been furnished to Permittee or to Permittee's agents or contractors in connection with work of any character performed or claimed to have been performed on the Premises by or at the direction of Permittee. 11.2. Bond: At any time Permittee either desires to or is required to make any repairs, alterations, additions, improvements or utility installation thereon, or otherwise, Permittor may at its sole option require Permittee, at Permittee's sole cost and expense, to obtain and provide to Permittor a lien and completion bond in an amount equal to one and one-half (1-1/2) times the estimated cost of such improvements, to insure Permittor against liability for mechanics and materialmen's liens and to insure completion of the work. 11.3. Permittor May Make Improvements: Permittee agrees that Permittor, at its option, may at its own expense make repairs, alterations or improvements which Permittor may deem necessary or advisable for the preservation, safety or improvement of the Premises or improvements located thereon, if any. 11.4. Notification of Completion: Upon completion of capital improvements made on the Premises, it is the Permittee's responsibility to promptly notify Permittor of such completion. 12. ASSIGNMENT: 12.1. Assignment/Subletting: The sublease or any part thereof shall not be assigned by Penmittee, by operation of law or otherwise, nor shall the premises or any part thereof be sublet without the prior written consent of Permittor, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. If Permittee is a corporation, the transfer of a majority of Permittee's stock shall constitute an assignment for purposes of this paragraph. 12.2. No Release of Permittee's Liability: No assignment of this leasehold interest shall release Permittee from the obligation to pay the rent and to perform all other obligations to be performed by Permittee under the terms of its sublease. No assignment shall so release Permittee unless Permittor's consent is obtained pursuant to Paragraph 12.1. In the event that Permittor's consent to assignment is so obtained, Permittee shall be relieved of all liability arising from this permit and arising out of any act, occurrence or omission occurring after Permittor's consent is obtained. The Permittee's assignee must assume and agree to carry out all of the obligations of Permittee under this permit. 13. DEFAULT: 13.1. Definition: It shall be a default of this Permit if the Permittee fails to comply with any of the statutes, ordinances, rules, orders, regulations, and requirements of the federal, state, and/or city governments, any terms of this Permit and/or the underlying lease. 13.2 Action Upon Notice of Default: OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. 13.2.1 In the event of default as provided above, the Permittor may, if it so elects, at any time thereafter, terminate this permit and the term hereof, on giving to the Permittee thirty (30) days notice (Notice of Default), in writing, of the Permittor's intention to terminate the Permit. 13.2.2. Alternatively, the Permittor may allow the Permittee to cure the default within thirty (30) days or, within that time, provide adequate assurance of future ability to cure the default. Adequate assurance shall include, but not be limited to, a deposit in escrow, a guarantee by a third party acceptable to Permittor, a surety bond, or a letter of credit. The default must be cured within ninety (90) days of the notice of default. 13.3. Termination of Permit: Upon the expiration of either of the notice periods specified in Paragraph 13.2 above, and if the event causing the default is not corrected in a timely manner, this permit and the term hereof, together with any and all other rights and options of Permittee herein specified, shall expire and come to an end on the day fixed in such notice. 13.4. No Waiver of Remedies: In the event of default by Permittee, the Permittor may choose not to pursue a claim against Permittee. Such decision will not operate as a waiver of any other remedies or claims then available to the Permittor or those that may become available. 14. BINDING AGREEMENT: Subject to the restriction upon assignment or subletting as set forth herein, all of the terms, conditions, and provisions of this Permit shall be binding upon the parties, their successors and assigns, and in the case of a Permittee who is a natural person, his or her personal representative and heirs. 15. RIGHT OF INSPECTION. Permittee will allow Permittor, or Permittor's agent, free access to the Premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspection, or for making repairs, additions or alterations to the Premises, or any property owned by or under the control of Permittor. 16. SURRENDER OF PREMISES: Permittee shall quit and surrender the premises at the end of the term in a condition as good as the reasonable use thereof would permit, normal wear and tear excepted. Alterations, additions or improvements which may be made by either of the parties hereto on the Premises, except movable office furniture or trade fixtures put in at the expense of Permittee, shall be and remain the property of the Permittor and shall remain on and be surrendered with the Premises as a part thereof at the termination of this lease without hindrance, molestation, or injury. Permittee shall repair at its sole expense any damage to the Premises occasioned by its use thereof, or by the removal of Permittee's trade fixtures, furnishings and equipment which repair shall include the patching and filling of holes and repair of structural damage. 17. INSURANCE: 17.1. Personal Property: It is agreed that Permittor shall not be held liable in any manner for, or on account of, any loss or damage to personal property of the Permittee, Permittee's invitees or other persons, which may be sustained by fire or water or other insured peril, or for the loss of any articles by burglary, theft or any other cause from or upon the Premises. It is OPERATING PERMIT City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. acknowledged that Permittor does not cover any of the personal property of Permittee, Permittee's invitees or other persons upon the Premises through its insurance. Permittee, its invitees and other persons upon the Premises are solely responsible to obtain suitable personal property insurance. 17.2. Liability Insurance. The Permittee agrees to maintain, in force, during the term of this Permit a policy of comprehensive public liability and property damage insurance written by a company authorized to do business in the State of Washington against any liability arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the Premises and all areas appurtenant thereto. The limits of liability shall be in an amount of not less than $1,000,000.00 for injury to or death of one person in any one accident or occurrence and in an amount of not less than $1,000,000.00 for injury to or death of more than one person in any one accident or occurrence, and of not less than $1,000,000.00 for property damage. The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Permittee hereunder. The insurance policy shall have a Landlord's Protective Liability endorsement attached thereto. 17.3. Insurance Policies: Insurance required hereunder shall be written in companies acceptable to Permittor and rated A-10 or better in "Best's Insurance Guides". Coverages shall be submitted on forms prescribed by Permittor. Prior to possession, the Permittee shall deliver to Permittor copies of policies of such insurance acquired by Permittee, or certificates evidencing the existence and amounts of such insurance, with loss payable clauses satisfactory to Permittor. Permittor shall be named as an additional insured. No such policy shall be cancelable or subject to reduction of coverage or other modification except after forty-five (45) days' prior written notice to Permittor. Permittee shall, not less than forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration of such policies, furnish Permittor with renewals or "binders" therefore. Permittee shall not do or permit to be done anything which shall invalidate the insurance policies referred to above. Permittee shall forthwith, upon Permittor's demand, reimburse Permittor for any additional premiums attributable to any act or omission or operation of Permittee causing such increase in the cost of insurance. If the Permittee shall fail to procure and maintain said insurance the Permittor may, but shall not be required to, procure and maintain the same, but at the expense of Permittee. 18. LIMITATION UPON PERMTTTOR'S LIABILITY. Permittor shall not be liable for any damage to property or persons caused by, or arising out of (a) any defect in or the maintenance or use of the Premises, or the improvements, fixtures and appurtenances of which the premises constitute a part; or (b) water coming from the roof, water pipes, flooding of the Cedar River or other body of water, or from any other source whatsoever, whether within or without the Premises; or (c) any act or omission of any Permittee or other occupants of the building, or their agents, servants, employees or invitees thereof. 19. INDEMNITY: Permittee covenants to indemnify and save harmless Permittor against any and all claims arising from the conduct and management of or from any work or thing whatsoever done in or about the Premises or the improvements or equipment thereon during the lease term, or arising from any act or negligence of the Permittee or any of its agents, contractors, patrons, customers, or employees, or arising from any accident, injury, or damage whatsoever, however caused, to any person or persons, or to the property of any person, persons, OPERATING PERMIT 9 City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. corporation or other entity occurring during the lease term on, in, or about the Premises, and from and against all costs, attorney's fees, expenses, and liabilities incurred in or from any such claims or any action or proceeding brought against the Permittor by reason of any such claim, except such claims arising directly or indirectly out of Permittor's sole act or omission. Permittee, on notice from Permittor, shall resist or defend such action or proceeding forthwith. 20. HOLDING OVER: Permittee understands that upon expiration of the term of this permit, Permittee must execute a new permit with the Permittor as a condition to remaining on the premises. Permittee further understands that if, without execution of any extension or renewal of this permit, Permittee should remain in possession of the premises after expiration or termination of the term of this permit, notwithstanding any extension of its sublease with Lessee, then the Lessee shall be in default of its lease, LAG 03-002 and Permittor may evict the Lessee and the Permittee. All the conditions, terms and provisions of this permit shall be applicable during such holding over. 21. NO WAIVER: It is further covenanted and agreed between the parties hereto that no waiver by Permittor of a breach by Permittee of any covenant, agreement, stipulation, or condition of this lease shall be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same covenant, agreement, stipulation, or condition, or a breach of any other covenant agreement, stipulation, or condition. 22. NOTICES: All notices under this lease shall be in writing and delivered in person, with receipt therefore, or sent by certified mail, to the following addresses: a) For the City of Renton: b) For the Permittee: Airport Manager Aero-Copters, Inc. 616 West Perimeter Road 800 West Perimeter Road Renton, Washington 98055 Renton, WA 98055 23. DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED: 23.1. Discrimination Prohibited: Permittee covenants and agrees not to discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of race, color, creed, sex, national origin, or any other class of person protected by Federal or State law or the Renton City Code, in the use of any of its facilities provided for the public in the Airport. Permittee further agrees to furnish services on a fair, equal and not unjustly discriminatory basis to all users thereof, and to charge on a fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory basis for each unit of service; provided that Permittee may make reasonable and non-discriminatory discounts, rebates, or other similar types of price reductions to volume purchasers. 23.2. Minority Business Enterprise Policy: It is the policy of the Department of Transportation that minority business enterprises as defined in 49 C.F.R. Part 23 shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of leases as defined in 49 C.F.R. 23.5. Consequently, this lease is subject to 49 C.F.R. Part 23, as applicable. No person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of or otherwise discriminated against in OPERATING PERMIT 10 City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. connection with the award and performance of any contract, including leases covered by 49 C.F.R. Part 23, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex. 23.3. Application to Sub -leases: Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 12 of this Permit, Permittee agrees that it will include the above clause in all assignments of this lease or sub -leases, and cause its assignee(s) and sub-lessee(s) to similarly include the above clause in further assignments or sub -leases. 24. FORCE MAJEURE: In the event that either party hereto shall be delayed or hindered in or prevented from the performance of any act required hereunder by reason of strikes, lockouts, labor troubles, inability to procure materials, failure of power, restrictive governmental laws or regulations, riots, insurrections, war, or other reason of like nature not the fault of the party delayed in performing work or doing acts required under the terms of this Lease, then performance of such act shall be extended for a period equivalent to the period of such delay. The provisions of this paragraph shall not, however, operate to excuse Permittee from the prompt payment of rent, or any other payment required by the terms of this Permit, to be made by Permittee. 25. CAPTIONS: Article and paragraph captions are not a part hereof. 26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Permit contains all agreements of the parties with respect to any matter mentioned herein. No prior agreement or understanding pertaining to any such matter shall be effective. This Permit may be modified in writing only, signed by the parties in interest at the time of the modification. In the event of conflict between the terms of this Permit and the sublease agreement between Permittee and Lessee, the terms of this Permit supersede. 27. CUMULATIVE REMEDIES: No remedy or election hereunder shall be deemed exclusive, but shall, wherever possible, be cumulative with all other remedies at law or in equity. 28. CORPORATE AUTHORITY: If Permittee is a corporation, each individual executing this Lease on behalf of said corporation represents and warrants that he is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Permit on behalf of said corporation in accordance with a duly adopted resolution of the Board of Directors of said corporation and in accordance with the Bylaws of said corporation, and that this Permit is binding upon said corporation in accordance with its terms. 29. TRANSFER OF PREMISES BY PERMITTOR: In the event of any sale, conveyance, transfer or assignment by Permittor of its interest in the Premises, Permittor shall be relieved of all liability arising from this Permit and arising out of any act, occurrence or omission occurring after the consummation of such sale, conveyance, transfer or assignment. OPERATING PERMIT 11 City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. PERMITTEE: Aero-Copters, Inc. a Washington corporation 40 By Michael V Leary its: Owner/Presid�gnt Date: S"7/OS PERIVIITTOR: THE CITY OF RENTON a Washington municipal corporation Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor Date: ATTEST: By Bonnie Walton, City Clerk Date: Approved as to legal form: City Attorney OPERATING PERMIT 12 City of Renton to Aero-Copters, Inc. LEASE AGREEMENT AirO, Inc. OFFICE/ HANGER LEASE This Lease Agreement (this "Lease") is dated January 1, 2004, by and between Michael O'Leary ("Landlord for AirO), and Aero-Copters, Inc. ("Tenant"). The parties agree as follows: PREMISES. Landlord, in consideration of the lease payments provided in this Lease, leases to Tenant shared office/hanger space in the building and shared ramp space on the west side of Renton Municipal Airport. (the "Premises") located at 800 West Perimeter Road, Renton, King County, Washington 98055. TERM. The lease term will begin on January 1, 2004, and will terminate on December 31, 2004, and will be automatically renewable in one year increments if mutually agreed upon, up to a total of 10 years. Lessor or Lessee has the right to renegotiate terms in the month of December prior to automatic renewal. LEASE PAYMENTS. Tenant shall pay to Landlord monthly installments of $1500.00, payable in advance on the first day of each month. This payment is for the aircraft owned by Aero-Copters. Aero-Copters will pay $1250.00 a month for additional leased aircraft stored on the premises. Payments shall be made to the Landlord at 800 West Perimeter Road, Renton, WA 98055, which address may be changed from time to time by the Landlord. DESCRIPTION OF SUBLEASED AREAS. Aircraft can be parked anywhere within the hanger general area. Other common areas include: lobby, flight planning room, conference room, restrooms, and the use of the ramp area. POSSESSION. Tenant shall be entitled to possession on the first day of the term of this Lease, and shall yield possession to Landlord on the last day of the term of this Lease, unless otherwise agreed by both parties in writing. At the expiration of the term, Tenant shall remove its goods and effects and peaceable yield up the Premises to Landlord in as good a condition as when delivered to Tenant, ordinary wear and tear excepted. PURPOSE AND USE. Use of Premises: The Premises are leased to the Permittee for the following described purposes: ■ The operation of an Aircraft charter and Aircraft Taxi Service in accordance with the Minimum Standards for the operation of this type of commercial aeronautic activity at the Renton Municipal Airport ■ The operation of Aircraft Maintenance and Repair, in accordance with the minimum Standards for the operation of this type of commercial aeronautic activity at the Renton Municipal Airport. ■ Continuous Use: Permittee covenants that the premises shall be continuously used for those purposes during the term of the Permit, shall not be allowed to stand vacant or idle, and condition of this lease shall be construed to be, a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same covenant, agreement, stipulation, or condition, or a breach of any other covenant agreement, stipulation, or condition. PARKING. Tenant shall be entitled to parking privileges associated with the building. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Tenant shall maintain liability insurance on the Premises with personal injury limits of at least $1,000,000.00 for injury to one person, and $1,000,000.00 for. any one accident, and a limit of at least $1,000,000.00 for damage to property per terms of the Airport Operating Permit and Agreement with the City of Renton. Tenant shall deliver appropriate evidence to Landlord as proof that adequate insurance is in force issued by companies reasonably satisfactory to Landlord. Landlord shall receive advance written notice from the insurer prior to any termination of such insurance policies. Tenant shall also maintain any other insurance which Landlord may reasonably require for the protection of Landlord's interest in the Premises. Tenant is responsible for maintaining casualty insurance for its own property. MAINTENANCE. Tenant shall have the responsibility to maintain the Premises in good repair at all times during the term of this Lease. UTILITIES AND SERVICES. Landlord will pay water, sewer, power, gas, and garbage. Any other services that the tenant requires will be there sole responsibility. TERMINATION. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Lease, Landlord may terminate this lease upon 90 days' written notice to Tenant. DEFAULTS. Tenant shall be in default of this Lease if Tenant fails to fulfill any lease obligation or term by which Tenant is bound. Subject to any governing provisions of law to the contrary, if Tenant fails to cure any financial obligation within 30 days (or any other obligation within 30 days) after written notice of such default is provided by Landlord to Tenant, Landlord may take possession of the Premises without further notice (to the extend permitted by law), and without prejudicing Landlord's rights to damages. In the alternative, Landlord may elect to cure any default and the cost of such action shall be added to Tenant's financial obligations under this Lease shall be additional rent, whether or not such sums or charges are designated as "additional rent". The rights provided by this paragraph are cumulative in nature and are in addition to any other rights afforded by law. HOLDOVER If Tenant maintains possession of the Premises for any period after the termination of this Lease ("Holdover Period"), Tenant shall pay to Landlord lease payment(s) during the Holdover Period at a rate equal to the most recent rate preceding the Holdover Period. Such holdover shall constitute a month -to -month extension of this Lease only if terms of payment due. CUMULATIVE RIGHTS. The rights of the parties under this Lease are cumulative, and shall not be construed as exclusive unless otherwise required by law. REMODELING OR STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS. Tenant shall have the obligation to conduct any construction or remodeling (at Tenant's expense) that may be required to use the Premises as specified above. Tenant may also construct such fixtures on the Premises (at Tenant's expense) that appropriately facilitate its use for such purposes. Such construction shall be undertaken and such fixtures maybe erected on with prior written consent to of the Landlord, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Tenant shall not install awnings or advertisements on any part of the Premises without Landlord's prior written consent. At the end of the lease term, Tenant shall be entitled to remove (or at the request of Landlord shall remove) such fixtures, and shall restore the Premises to substantially the same condition of the Premises at the commencement of this Lease. ACCESS BY LANDLORD TO PREMISES. Subject to Tenant's consent (which shall not be unreasonably withheld), Landlord shall have the right to enter the Premises to make inspections, provide necessary services, or show the unit to prospective tenants or workers. However, Landlord does not assume any liability for the care or supervision of the Premises. As provided by law, in the case of an emergency, Landlord may enter the Premises without Tenant's consent. During the last three months of this Lease, or any extension of this Lease, Landlord shall be allowed to display the usual "To Let" signs and show the Premises to prospective tenants. INDEMNITY REGARDING USE OF PREMISES. To the extent permitted by law, Tenant agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Landlord from and against any and all losses, claims, liabilities, and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, if any, misuse of the Premises, except Landlord's act or negligence. DANGEROUS MATERIALS. Tenant shall not keep or have on the Premises any article or thing of a dangerous, flammable, or explosive character that might substantially increase the danger of fire on the Premises, or that might be considered hazardous by a responsible insurance company, unless the prior written consent of Landlord is obtained and proof of adequate insurance protection is provided by Tenant to Landlord. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS. Tenant shall promptly comply with all laws, ordinances, requirements and regulations of the federal, state, county, municipal and other authorities, and the fire insurance underwriters. However, Tenant shall not by this provision be required to make alterations to the exterior of the building or alterations of the structural nature. ARBITRATION. Any controversy or claim relating to this contract, including the construction or application of this contract, will be settled by binding arbitration under the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and any judgment granted by the arbitrator(s) may be enforced in any court of proper jurisdiction. ASSIGNABILITY/SUBLETTING. Tenant may not assign or sublease any interest in the Premises, nor effect a change in the majority ownership of the Tenant (from the ownership existing at the inception of this lease), nor assign, mortgage or pledge this Lease, without the prior written consent of Landlord, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. DISCRIMINATION. Discrimination Prohibited — Lessee covenants and agrees not to discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of race, color, creed, sex or national origin in the use of any of its facilities provided for the public on the Airport. Lessee further agrees to furnish services on a fair, equal and not unjustly discriminatory basis to all users thereof, and to charge of a fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory basis to all users thereof, and to charge on a fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory basis for each unit of service: provided that Lessee -may make reasonable and not -discriminatory discounts, rebates, or other similar types of price reductions to volume purchasers. NOTICE. Notices under this Lease shall not be deemed valid unless given or served in writing and forwarded by mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: LANDLORD: AirO, c/o Michael O'Leary 800 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 TENANT: Aero-Copters, Inc. 800 West Perimeter Road Renton, WA 98055 Such addresses may be changed from time to time by either party by providing notice as set fourth above. Notices mailed in accordance with the above provisions shall be deemed received on the third day after posting. GOVERNING LAW. This Lease shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington ENTIRE AGREEMENT/AMENDMENT. This Lease Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and there are no other promises, conditions, understandings or other agreements, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter of this Lease. This Lease may be modified or amended in writing, if the writing is signed by the party obligated under the amendment. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Lease shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the remaining provisions shall continue to be valid and enforceable. If a court finds that any provisions shall continue to be valid and enforceable. If a court find that nay provision of this Lease is invalid or unenforceable, but that by limiting such provisions, it would become valid and enforceable, then such provision shall be deemed to be written, construed, and enforced as so limited. WAIVER The failure of either party to enforce any provisions of this Lease shall not be construed as a waiver or limitation of that party's right to subsequently enforce and compel strict compliance with every provision of this Lease. BINDING EFFECT. The provisions of this lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of both parties and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns. LANDLORD: AirO, Inc. Michael J. O'Leary/ Owner/President TENANT: Aero-Copters, Inc. By: v w111�11 r t caiuvut, : January 1, 2004 January 1, 2004 CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: June 20, 2005 Dept/Div/Board.. Utility Systems, Surface Water Staff Contact...... Ron Straka, (ext. 7248) Agenda Status - Consent .............. X Subject: Public Hearing.. WSDOT I-405 Project Concurrence Letter - Johns Correspondence.. Creek Outfall Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Exhibits: Issue paper Study Sessions...... Concurrence Letter — Johns Creek Outfall Information......... Recommended Action: Approvals: Refer to Utilities Committee Legal Dept...... Finance Dept... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... None Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget City Share Total Project.. SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is proposing a new storm system outfall to Johns Creek, located in Gene Coulon Memorial Park. The storm system would convey storm water runoff from the portion of I-405 that currently drains to Johns Creek along with runoff from the area upstream of I-405 within the same drainage basin. The new outfall would allow WSDOT to directly discharge runoff to Johns Creek and Lake Washington without having to provide flow control (detention) for the runoff from I-405. WSDOT would provide water quality treatment for all of the runoff from I-405. The proposed new storm water outfall and Concurrence Letter was developed in coordination between WSDOT, the Surface Water Utility and the Parks Division. The Concurrence Letter is based upon a 15% design and identifies the conditions and requirements associated with future final design and construction of the proposed outfall. The Concurrence Letter will allow WSDOT the certainty to proceed with the proposed outfall in their project environmental review, future design phases and ultimately construction as part of the future I-405 Renton to Bellevue widening project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Concurrence Letter with the Washington State Department of Transportation for the proposed Johns Creek Outfall storm water system. H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27-3124 North Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Johns Creek Outfall LOC AGENDA BILL.doc\RStp PLANNING/BUILDING/ + RPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 10, 2005 TO: Terri Briere, Council President Members of the Renton City Council VIA: U Mayor Kathy Keolker,-.Wheeler FROM: Gregg AlZimmermaministrator STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Utility Supervisor (ext. 7248) SUBJECT: WSDOT I-405 Project Concurrence Letter — Johns Creek Outfall ISSUE: The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) requests the City's approval of a Concurrence Letter for the Johns Creek Outfall to discharge I-405 storm water runoff and runoff from upstream tributary area to Johns Creek, in the Gene Coulon Memorial Park, as part of the future widening of I-405. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to sign the Concurrence Letter with the Washington State Department of Transportation for the proposed Johns Creek Outfall storm water system. BACKGROUND SUMMARY: The WSDOT has worked with the City Parks Department and Surface Water Utility to develop a 15% design for a storm system to convey storm water runoff from areas that are tributary to Johns Creek that include the I-405 right-of-way and area upstream of I-405. The proposed storm system would discharge into Johns Creek, located in the Gene Coulon Memorial Park (see Exhibit attached). The size of the proposed storm system is 72-inches at the outlet in the Park. The proposed Concurrence Letter defines the conditions and requirements for proceeding with the proposed design of the Johns Creek Outfall. The Concurrence Letter will allow WSDOT to include the proposal in the I-405 project environmental review (NEPA) documents. The new outfall would allow WSDOT to directly discharge runoff to Johns Creek and Lake Washington without having to provide flow control (detention) for the runoff from I-405, which would reduce the cost of the I-405 widening project. WSDOT would provide water quality treatment for all of the runoff from I-405, which is currently not being treated. WSDOT Johns Creek/WSDOT Letter June 10, 2005 Page 2 of 2 performed a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the total basin area based upon future land use conditions and assuming that I-405 was widened. The analysis showed that the change in runoff from the total tributary area would be minor and could be accommodated in the Johns Creek channel. As the design process proceeds, further analysis will be done to verify that flows can be accommodated in the Johns Creek channel without causing damage to the Park. The proposed new Johns Creek Outfall would intercept runoff from areas upstream of I-405, within the North Renton sub -basin, which all currently drains to Johns Creek. The runoff from this area currently drains from upstream of I-405 to a storm system in N 81h Street that connects to storm systems in Garden Avenue N, which convey the runoff to Johns Creek just downstream of the intersection of Lake Washington Boulevard and Sunset Blvd. The proposed new outfall would free up capacity in the storm systems in N 81h Street and Garden Avenue N. This would improve drainage in the area of the Boeing re -development (Lakeshore Landing) and could reduce the need for system improvement in the future. CONCLUSION: The Council is requested to authorize the Mayor to sign the Concurrence Letter with WSDOT for the Johns Creek Outfall. Attachment cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director 1I:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP 27-Transporation Projects (TIP)\I-405 Corridor Study\SWP 27- 3124 North Renton Project\1003 City Correspondence\Johns Creek LOC Issue Paper.doc\RStp Congestion Relief & Bus Rapid Transit Projects 600 —108th Avenue NE, Suite 405 Bellevue, WA 98004 Main 425-456-8500 Fax 425-456-8600 May 10, 2005 Gregg Zimmerman, Public Works Director City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Concurrence Letter - Johns Creek Outfall Dear Mr. Zimmerman: This letter documents that the City of Renton and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) concur with the 15% design for the Johns Creek Outfall. Johns Creek Background The City of Renton and WSDOT have jointly investigated a non-traditional proposal to provide water quality treatment and stormwater controls for runoff from the I-405 Corridor Project from MP 4.59 to MP 6.09. Water quality treatment will be provided for all runoff from the I-405 right-of-way, which will include 7.3 acres of new impervious area from the I-405 improvements in the Johns Creek watershed. The Johns Creek watershed is 1082 acres. Upstream of I-405, the watershed includes 868 acres of primarily residential land use. I-405, including the new impervious area, occupies 72.6 acres. The watershed downstream of I-405 is primarily commercial land use and includes 215 acres of land (including the I-405 area). The increased impervious area from expansion of I-405 would increase impervious area within the basin by less than 1%. All water within the basin currently drains to Johns Creek, and this water is currently discharged near the entrance to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Under existing conditions, runoff from this part of I-405 is combined with runoff from the upper Johns Creek watershed (City of Renton, residential area), and then discharged to the City of Renton drainage system located in the lower basin. The City storm system routes the runoff westerly along N 8`h to where it joins the North 8`h Street/Garden Avenue North storm system. The Garden Avenue North storm system then conveys the water north to where it discharges to a series of intermittent stream and culvert conveyances on Johns Creek beginning approximately 200 yards upstream of the entrance road to Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park. Greg Zimmerman April 25, 2005 Page 2 A traditional stormwater response for this watershed would construct a series of stormwater vaults within the existing WSDOT Right of Way (ROW) to provide both water quality treatment and flow control, as required by the WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual. The City of Renton and WSDOT held a series of discussions in 2004 and early 2005 to develop a more efficient and cost-effective solution to managing stormwater within the Johns Creek basin. 15 % Design Development The City of Renton and the I-405 team held a series of discussions to develop the proposed Johns Creek Outfall as the stormwater component of the North 8ih Street HOV Direct Access Project. This design concept was investigated sufficient to allow preparation of a 15% design package. The design addresses a series of potential concerns and opportunities that were identified through the discussions. Protection of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park facilities and plant materials was identified as a major concern, which triggered additional study, consideration of several discharge locations, and careful routing of the discharge pipe to minimize disturbance to Park facilities. Minimizing disruption to Park operations and the Parks users was also a major concern and resulted in limitations on construction timing and activities. Sizing the new stormwater facilities to handle anticipated future flows from both I-405 and from residential areas in the upper watershed was also addressed during preliminary design. Finally, minimizing impacts to the backwater channel of Johns Creek was also a major concern which triggered studies of the projected changes to water surface elevation and stream flow velocities. Preliminary design discussions identified the opportunity to forgo stormwater detention (flow control) for this project. The purpose of stormwater detention is to provide protection to downstream areas from erosion and flooding problems associated with increased flows as a result of a project. Studies as part of preliminary design established that detention would not provide any meaningful additional protection to downstream areas, and detention would not serve a useful purpose for this project. The bulk of the downstream conveyance for this project will be drainage pipes specifically sized and constructed to convey both current and anticipate future flows. This piped system has been sized specifically for the projected future flows and will not be affected by either erosion or flooding issues. A short section of Johns Creek within Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park that would receive the additional discharge was investigated during preliminary design. Studies established that this is a backwater channel of Lake Washington, and the channel is sufficiently large that neither water elevation nor flow rate will be noticeably changed by the project's peak discharges. To address concerns identified during the preliminary design process, a series of conditions were developed which state the specific concerns and how they will be addressed during final design and construction. A full listing of the conditions, which will guide final design and construction, is attached (Johns Creek Outfall Attachment 1) *Elk Page 2 Washington State V, Department of Transportation —Greg Zimmerman April 25, 2005 Page 3 Final DesijZn Development The City of Renton and WSDOT anticipate continuation of the cooperative design process during the development of Final Design for this project. Development of the final design will be guided by the conditions established during the preliminary design process and described in the attached Johns Creek Outfall Attachment 1. Funding for the final design and construction of the North Renton Congestion Relief and Bus Rapid Transit Project is dependent on future funding actions, such as legislative action by the State of Washington or a Regional Transportation Investment District (RTID) public vote. Concurrence I am anticipating a project that will set a high standard of cooperation between the City of Renton and WSDOT. I ask, by signing below, that the City and WSDOT concur with the 15% design for the Johns Creek Outfall. This 15% design will be examined by the project's NEPA and ESA documents, which are currently in preparation. The City and WSDOT commit to work together, guided by the conditions in the attached Johns Creek Outfall Attachment 1, to develop the final design, obtain necessary approvals, and prepare associated permits once funding becomes available. Craig J. Stone, PE Urban Projects Director City of Renton Concurrence: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Mayor, City of Renton Attest: Date Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk cc: Administrators Executive Committee members City Design Team members I-405 Project Team file A1111111► Page 3 Washington State W, Department of Transportation Johns Creek Outfall Attachment 1 This document outlines an understanding between the City of Renton and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to establish a stormwater discharge to Johns Creek at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park in the City of Renton. Included in this outline is a listing of the responsibilities of each party as part of the anticipated agreement, and the 15% design for the Johns Creek Outfall and related conveyance systems (Appendix E: Johns Creek Backwater Analysis and Appendix F: Outfall Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis, Supplements to Preliminary Hydraulic Report, North 81h HOV Direct Access). Both parties are aware that the Johns Creek Outfall is a part of the larger Renton to Bellevue Project and that funding for the Renton to Bellevue Project has not been allocated at the time this document was prepared. Both parties presume that funding will occur in the foreseeable future and they wish to complete this letter of concurrence now to provide the certainty that the Johns Creek Outfall and the associated flow exemption will be included as designed in the Renton to Bellevue Project once funding is secured and construction commences. Both parties agree: - the Park needs to be protected during construction ♦ That Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park is an important recreational resource to the City of Renton, and that substantial efforts should be made during construction of the Johns Creek Outfall to minimize disruption of Park uses; and - the Johns Creek Backwater Study is accurate ♦ That the Johns Creek Backwater Study based upon the 15% design work accurately describes the existing condition of the local drainage system in the vicinity of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park at the time of this agreement, and accurately anticipates the effects of Johns Creek Outfall on the local drainage systems in the Johns Creek watershed. An updated hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the proposed Johns Creek Outfall storm system improvements and the Johns Creek channel down to Lake Washington will be conducted as part of the project final design; and flows under discussion currently go to -Johns Creek ♦ That stormwater runoff flows from the affected section of I-405 and tributary areas of the City are currently routed to Johns Creek via local drainage systems, and these flows are contributing to infrastructure limitations in the local conveyance systems; and - the change in impervious area in the Johns Creek Watershed; from I-405 improvements is small ♦ That construction of the Renton to Bellevue Project would increase impervious area within the Johns Creek watershed by approximately 7.3 acres. This amounts to less than 1% increase in impervious area across the Johns Creek watershed, which would result in a very small increase to existing flows; and Attachment I page 1 Johns Creek Outfall - providing water quality treatment to I-405 runoff will improve Johns Creek ♦ That providing enhanced water quality treatment to 100% of the stormwater flows from the I-405 corridors existing and proposed pollution generating pavement surfaces within the Johns Creek watershed would result in an improvement to water quality of existing storm water discharges to Johns Creek; and that detention is not necessary in this instance as it provides no additional protection to downstream resources ♦ That providing detention to I-405 runoff routed to the Johns Creek Outfall prior to discharge would provide limited environmental or resource protection benefit. The outfall location, as shown to the north of the Park entrance, is within the backwater area of Lake Washington, there is sufficient channel capacity in the affected reach of Johns Creek to safely accommodate unrestricted stormwater runoff flows from the I- 405 corridor, and that post -project flow velocities would be low enough that there are no erosion or bank stability concerns; and - the new system will also convey the 100 yr local flows from upstream basins ♦ That the I-405 conveyance shall convey the 100-year design storm of 3 upstream sub - basins of Johns Creek that currently cross 1-405 to the new discharge so that these flows are removed from the local conveyance systems they currently occupy; and - the new conveyance system and outfall will reduce flooding near Southport bridge ♦ That establishing the Johns Creek Outfall will reduce flooding in the vicinity of the Southport stream crossing immediately upstream of Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park; and - the new conveyance system will free capacity in existing conveyance systems ♦ That establishing the Johns Creek Outfall will free capacity in existing local drainage and conveyance systems. City of Renton agrees: - to provide easements upon approval of final design ♦ To approve drainage and temporary construction easements submitted by WSDOT on properties owned by the City to allow construction and operation of the stormwater outfall and related conveyance system as described in the 15% design document (Appendix E: Johns Creek Backwater Analysis and Appendix F: Outfall Pipeline Hydraulic Analysis, Supplements to Preliminary Hydraulic Report, North 9h HOV Direct Access).; and - to participate in finalizing design ♦ To participate in discussions with WSDOT and the Design/Build team as part of progressing the 15% design to the final design such that a final design review by the City will take place in timely manner to approve required City permits for construction; and - to support direct discharge waiver if'one is needed ♦ To support a WSDOT request for a direct discharge waiver to Department of Ecology, should such a waiver be deemed necessary as part of the permitting process for the Renton to Bellevue Project. City support will be based on hydraulic and hydrologic analyses reviewed by the City and is subject to any environmental reviews that may be performed in the future; and Attachment I page 2 Johns Creek Outfall - to work towards consensus to address new issues ♦ To work with WSDOT and the Design/Build team to reach consensus on how to address new issues as they develop as part of the implementation process for the Johns Creek Outfall; and - to own, operate, and maintain the conveyance system outside of WSDOT ROW ♦ To accept ownership upon completion of construction, and to operate and maintain those portions of the conveyance system which lie outside of the WSDOT ROW as shown in the 15% design review plans. The City's agreement to maintain these systems is contingent upon the City's approvals in regards to ease of maintenance access. A final agreement addressing maintenance issues will be developed as part of final design and will address which portions of the final will system will be maintained by the City and which portions will be maintained by WSDOT, and how maintenance costs will be distributed between the two parties. WSDOT agrees: - to construct as planned ♦ To construct the Johns Creek stormwater outfall as described in the 15% design document (Appendix E: Johns Creek Backwater Analysis and Appendix F: Outfall Pipelineydraulic Analysis, Supplements to Preliminary Hydraulic Report, North 8` HOV Direct Access).and - to participate in finalizing design ♦ To participate in discussions with City of Renton and the Design/Build team as part of progressing the 15% design to the final design; and - to make no project changes without concurrence from Renton ♦ To make no changes to the 15% design document (Appendix E: Johns Creek Backwater Analysis and Appendix F: Outfall Pipeline Hydraulic Anal Supplements to Preliminary Hydraulic Report, North 81h HOV Direct Access) or the area draining to this outfall without prior concurrence from the City of Renton; and - to provide enhanced water quality treatment for I-405 flows ♦ To provide enhanced water quality treatment methods (per the approved water quality treatment methods defined in the WSDOT Highway Runoff Manual that are applicable at the time of final design) for 100% of the existing and proposed pollution generating pavement surfaces within the I-405 corridor which is routed to the Johns Creek discharge; and to provide conveyance capacity to handle 100yr flows from 1-405 ♦ To provide conveyance capacity sufficient to handle stormwater flows generated by the implementation phase of the Renton to Bellevue Project; and - to provide conveyance capacity to handle 100yr flows from offsite basins for future land -use conditions ♦ To provide conveyance capacity sufficient to handle current and future off -site flows from upstream tributary areas identified on Sheet 1, Exhibit A, and upstream land use for ultimate development as determined from the City of Renton Zoning Map, adopted 12/22/03 (Appendix E: Johns Creek Backwater Analysis), and as described in Appendix E: Johns Creek Backwater Analysis. It is agreed that WSDOT will capture off -site flows upstream of I-405 and route them directly to the Johns Creek Attachment 1 page 3 Johns Creek Outfall Outfall without detention or treatment, thereby diverting flows away from existing City of Renton local conveyance systems west of I-405. It is agreed based upon the 15% design that 200 cfs constitutes sufficient capacity to meet this requirement, which may be revised as part of the final design; and - to own, operate, and maintain the conveyance system within the WSDOT ROW ♦ To own, operate, and maintain the portions of the Johns Creek conveyance system that lie within the WSDOT ROW. A final agreement addressing maintenance issues will be developed as part of final design and will address which portions of the final will system will be maintained by the City and which portions will be maintained by WSDOT, and how maintenance costs will be distributed between the two parties. ♦ To secure all necessary Section 4(f), Section 6 and/or other approvals related to use of the City park as part of the WSDOT project. Protection of Park Uses, Timing Issues - to minimize impacts to Park operations ♦ To work diligently with City of Renton Parks Department and the Design/Build team during construction to minimize physical impacts and disruption to recreation activities and maintenance operations at Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park and at the Park Maintenance Facility; and - to construct upland portions between Oct 15"' and March I" ♦ To minimize disrupting access to the Park by Park users, construction of the portions of the Johns Creek Outfall in the vicinity of the Park will occur during periods of low Park use (between October 15`h and March I't) except where limited by State and Federal permits; and - to start construction of in -water structure after July 4th weekend ♦ To minimize disrupting access to the Park by park users. When construction activity which must occur during high -park use periods due to State or Federal permit conditions, such activities will occur after July 41h weekend and not during Renton River Days; and to keep'access open to Maintenance Facility between 5am and llpm ♦ To minimize disrupting access to the Park Maintenance Facility, construction activities impacting access to the Maintenance Facility will occur during periods of low Park use (between October 15`h and March I") and will occur so that access to the Maintenance Facility is available during maintenance staff work hours (between 5AM and 11 PM) and - to maintain security at the maintenance facility during construction ♦ To provide and maintain security of maintenance facility during night work conditions when existing security measures are adversely affected by construction activities. Protection of Plant Materials - to avoid impacting median planters and plant materials Attachment 1 page 4 Johns Creek Outfall ♦ To avoid impacts to the Park's natural resources and plant materials, measures will be implemented to protect valuable plant materials within existing median planters on Park roadways. Measures will include prohibition of machinery operation in planter areas, prohibition of stockpiling in planter areas, protective fencing around planter areas during construction, and other measures agreed to by both parties during development of final design; and - to avoid removing trees ♦ To avoid impacts to the Park's natural resources and plants, no mature trees will be removed within the Park and substantial measures will be implemented to protect mature trees adjacent to the outfall route. Measures will include establishment and fencing of an exclusion zone around existing trees, prohibition of any construction related activity within the exclusion zone, and other measures agreed to by both parties during development of final design; and - to confine construction disturbance to aphalt=areas; where practicable ♦ To avoid impact to the Parks natural resources and plant materials, all construction activity will be confined to areas of existing asphalt paving where practicable. Construction of the outfall itself will necessitate work on the stream bank within the Park Maintenance Facility, and will not be confined to asphalt paving areas; and to "restore disturbed areas ♦ To restore all disturbed areas including asphalt, mulching, landscaping, fencing, etc. to pre -project conditions at completion of construction; and - to',verify design accommodates antid,pated'improvements ih4he Basin ♦ To minimize reconstruction of the outfall, the final design shall verify that the outfall system accommodates future City and private improvements that are known by the City at the time of the final design. - To address other impacts as identified ♦ To minimize park impacts as required. Construction outside of WSDOT I-405 ROW ♦ To minimize impacts to traffic, adjacent business and property owners when constructing the Johns Creek storm water conveyance system outside of WSDOT ROW, WSDOT will provide coordination with property owners and business and provide for approval by the City a traffic control plan; and ♦ Be responsible for any and all Utility relocates that may be required, the acquisition of any easements or property rights required for the construction of the Johns Creek stormwater conveyance system that are not covered by existing WSDOT permits or agreements (any Betterment for Utility to be by the Utility owner), and provide full and complete restoration of the construction area to existing (pre -project) conditions. Permits from' other agencies are required ♦ The final design and construction of the proposed Johns Creek Outfall is dependent upon the results of the environmental review (SEPA/NEPA) and WSDOT obtaining the required approvals and permits from all appropriate local, state and federal agencies, including grant agencies Attachment 1 page 5 Johns Creek Outfall eorresfon dence 6 -ao-os From: "John, Diane & Scott McClaine" <mcclaine3@comcast. net> To: <council@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: Wed, Jun 15, 2005 12:32 PM Subject: [Fwd: Suggestion] I hope to hear from you. Respectfully, Diane McClaine -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Suggestion Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:27:17 -0700 rom: John, Diane & Scott McClaine <mcclaine3@comcast. net> To: jrerecich@ci.renton.wa.us My son registered for the Red Cross sailing class at Gene Coulon Park in Spring and is eager to continue and convince his friends to sign up for the summer class. I am very impressed with the organization and instruction of the class and the park is a beautiful creation that has been excellently maintained for the many patrons who obviously enjoy it. am dismayed at the struggle to find a parking spot to enable my son to take this class. I spoke with a gentleman at the Community Center who was very sympathetic, but saw no options for a solution. If I pay for a class I should expect the class to take place and be provided with a reasonable opportunity to attend. At present, at Gene Coulon Park (on sunny days ... and perhaps during summer months) I have no way of knowing whether I can get my son there and stay around to supervise him and take him home afterwards because of the limited parking. If I go to the park as a citizen, I expect to take my chances of finding a place to park. If I go as a paying customer, I would expect some reasonable accommodation to assist me with getting access to what contracted for. Have you considered reserving 5-10 spaces near the canoe launch area marked with "Class instruction vouchers required" parking? Thus, when pay for this class you have also fulfilled your obligation to provide me with access to the class site by handing me a voucher tag to be displayed in my vehicle (for the designated class dates only)! Another option could be having a voucher to park in the regular boat launch area; again, I can receive my parking voucher tag to display in my car when I register and pay for class. I cannot afford paying the $5-$10 fee to park in that area the 8-10 times necessary for class instruction when I have already paid for the class. But, I would be willing to pay an additional $5 -$10 dollars added to the class fee for such a voucher giving me the opportunity to actually be able to park and attend the class I paid for. I think it is unreasonable to offer a paid service class and in essence imply, "We'll take your money, but good luck trying to get the service you paid for." 1 doubt I am the only paying customer having this problem and it seems this can be fixed, even if I have to pay a bit more for the privilege. I value the program you have created with the sailing club and I hope you value the customers who are willing to pay and promote your recreation classes. I have worked in the recreation field and I know that programs can be redesigned to better serve the public when there is an obvious problem. I am complaining with solutions included that can make your program more user friendly for others like me who are deciding whether to continue purchasing services from the City of Renton. I appreciate your evaluating this difficulty and finding a solution since the present conditions are unresponsive to the needs of your customers. I appreciate your consideration and response. Sincerely, Diane McClaine 425-432-5285 a s'/o;z S.E. A/7"" to/ tAa�e va<<eyl WA 4s038 PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT June 20, 2005 "Race Attendance" Ordinance (Referred June 6, 2005) APPROVE-0 DY CITY COUNCIL Date 6 -�o• aaoS The Public Safety recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve an amendment to the Renton Municipal Code to prohibiting attendance at night-time street racing events and criminalizing violations. The Committee further recommends that the ordinance regarding this matter be prepared and presented for adoption. 44t4-_,.� L'� /4"1-- Denis W. Law, Chair R�ndy Corman, ice -chair Tom Nelson, M e m b er C: Garry Anderson, Chief of Police Zanetta Fontes, Assistant City Attorney CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXING CERTAIN TERRITORY OF THE CITY OF RENTON (WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION; FILE NO. A-04-005) WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120 as amended, a petition in writing requesting that certain territory contiguous to the City of Renton, as described below, be annexed to the City of Renton, was presented and filed with the City Clerk on or about January 19, 2005; and WHEREAS, prior to the filing and circulation of said petition for annexation to the City of Renton, the petitioning owners notified the City Council of their intention to commence such proceedings as provided by law, as more particularly specified in RCW 35A.14.120, and upon public hearing thereon, it having been determined and the petitioning owners having agreed to assume their fair share of the pre-existing outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as it pertains to the territory petitioned to be annexed; and to accept that portion of the City's Comprehensive Plan as it pertains to the territory including the applicable Zoning Code relating thereto; and WHEREAS, the King County Department of Assessments has examined and verified on or about February 4, 2005 the signatures on the petition for annexation and determined signatures represent at least sixty percent (60%) of the assessed value (excluding streets) of the area to be annexed, as provided by law; and 1 ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, the Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department of the City of Renton having considered and recommended the annexing of said property to the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, the City Council fixed March 14, 2005, as the time and place for public hearing in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, Renton, Washington, upon the petition and notice thereof having been given as provided by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said notices, public hearings have been held at the time and place specified in the notices, and the Council having considered all matters in connection with the petition and further determined that all legal requirements and procedures of the law applicable to the petition method for annexation have been met; and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board having deemed the "Notice of Intention" approved as of May 17, 2005; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton is concurrently zoning the annexation site R-4, four units per net acre; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I, The findings, recitals, and determinations are hereby found to be true and correct in all respects. All requirements of the law in regard to the annexation by petition method, including the provisions of RCW 35A.14.120, 130, 140 and 150, have been met. It is further determined that the petition for annexation to the City of Renton of the property and territory described below is hereby approved and granted; the following described property being contiguous to the City limits of the City of Renton is hereby annexed to the City of 2 ORDINANCE NO. Renton, and such annexation to be effective on and after the approval, passage, and publication of this Ordinance; and on and after said date the property shall constitute a part of the City of Renton and shall be subject to all its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force and effect; the property being described as follows: See Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein [Said property, approximately 35.68 acres in area, is generally located east of 144 Avenue SE/Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, and west of 148 h Avenue/Nile Avenue NE, north of SE 1171e Street, and west of Honey Creek, south of SE 117`h Street, if extended.] and the owners of the property within the annexation shall assume their fair share of the outstanding indebtedness of the City of Renton as prescribed in RCW 35A.14.120 as it pertains to the property, and the property shall be subject to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. SECTION U. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the King County Council, State of Washington, and as otherwise provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of _ , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk 3 ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1191:6/06/05:ma 4 Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. I I - ❑ CD- _ Ej o J Exhibit A p c!] r 4 III GIU I� Qao F ICJ u a 9 a a C�o oq EEJ 9 _,� a o o d aQ o Ln Q ° G' ° ❑ o o rr j V � o Q � Q ° EJ 0 n L D � � p Thb, document b o yrophk to sxvEy occurecy. �d an Mortnotion representotim, not guoronleed mended far city puryoses only and awiade oa of the dote aAown. CJ . fat a d1- I. I Thb mcq raploY GurVos« °^lY• Wedgewood Lane Annexation 0 400 800 Figure 3: Existing Structure Map 1 : 4800 US�Y O� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Existing Structure Alex Pietsch, Administrator =• - G. Del Rosario Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. L N t0 8 October 2004 Please see legal description for actual boundary = Renton City Limits Proposed Annexation Area Exhibit B WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the east half (1/2) of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southerly of the south line of the plat of Honey Creek Estates, as recorded in Volume 63 of Plats, Pages 30 and 31, records of King County, Washington, and the westerly and easterly extensions thereof, and lying northerly of the north line of the south 990 feet of said Northeast quarter of Section 10; EXCEPT the east 30 feet thereof for County Road (148`h Avenue SE); TOGETHER WITH Lot C of King County Boundary Line Adjustment No. 1-041,0055, as recorded in Volume 180 of Surveys, Pages 222 and 223, under King County Recording No. 20041223900001, in the east half (1/2) of said Section 10. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ESTABLISHING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY ANNEXED WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM R4 (URBAN RESIDENTIAL, 4DU PER ACRE, HING COUNTY ZONING) TO R4 (RESIDENTIAL 4 DU/AC; FOUR DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) (WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION, FILE NO. A-04-005). WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Zoning Districts — Uses and Standards, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has not been zoned in the City of Renton; and WHEREAS, said property owners petitioned the City of Renton for annexation and concurrent rezoning, which said annexation having previously been approved and the property annexed to the City of Renton, and the City having held two public hearings to consider this zoning application, the first hearing being held on March 14, 2005, and the second hearing being held on June 20, 2005; and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION L The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby zoned to R-4 as hereinbelow specified. The annual ordinance adopting the maps of the City's 1 ►I ORDINANCE NO. zoning ordinance is hereby amended to evidence said rezoning and the EDNSP Administrator is authorized and directed to change the maps of the zoning ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to wit - See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. [Said property, approximately 34.65 acres in area, is generall located east of 144h Avenue SE/Jericho Avenue NE, if extended, and west of 148 Avenue/Nile Avenue NE, north of SE 117 h Street, and west of Honey Creek, south of SE 117 b Street, if extended.] SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005. Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005. Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1192:6/06/05:ma 0) Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 0 A A WITITITAff".. fro I Exhibit B WEDGEWOOD LANE PREZONE LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of the east half (1/2) of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying southerly of the south line of the plat of Honey Creek Estates, as recorded in Volume 63 of Plats, Pages 30 and 31, records of King County, Washington, and the westerly and easterly extensions thereof, and lying northerly of the north line of the south 990 feet of said Northeast quarter of Section 10; EXCEPT the east 30 feet thereof for County Road (1481h Avenue SE); TOGETHER WITH Lot C of King County Boundary Line Adjustment No. L04L0055, as recorded in Volume 180 of Surveys, Pages 222 and 223, under King County Recording No. 20041223900001, in the east half (1/2) of said Section 10; EXCEPT streets. Of 6-/3..,,I 6 aD-.2DD5 CITY OF RENTON, WASHNGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 5110 RELATING TO THE CITY OF RENTON FISCAL YEAR 2005 ANNUAL BUDGET. WHEREAS, the City Council passed the City of Renton's 2005 Annual Budget Ordinance (Ordinance No. 5110) on December 20, 2004; and WHEREAS, appropriated funds not expended in 2004 due to capital project interruptions and delays in invoice payments, need to be carried forward into this fiscal year resulting in the need to amend the City of Renton's 2005 Annual Budget; and WHEREAS, it is a priority of the City to appropriate $400,000 of funds into the Solid Waste Utility Fund (Fund 403) for the "Clean Sweep Renton" program, which includes funding the "Reuse It" program, Neighborhood Association Cleanup event, and associated public education and outreach campaign; and WHEREAS, it is a priority of the City to allocate $132,000 of funds into the Municipal Facilities Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 316) for the replacement of the entire current inventory of defibrillator equipment which is at the end of its useful life; and WHEREAS, the City needs to allocate $90,000 into the Waterworks Utility Fund (Fund 401) to fund the examination of the rate structure for the water, sewer and stormwater utilities by conducting a comprehensive utility rate study; and WHEREAS, the Police Department is in need of filling existing enforcement positions that have been left vacant due to military commitments and temporary assignment of duty to the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission and Immigration/Customs Enforcement Task Force; ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Ordinance No. 5110 establishing the City of Renton's 2005 Annual Budget is hereby amended as follows: 1. The General Fund (Fund 000) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: GENERAL FUND (Fund 000) FY 2005 Original Amended (ENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change of Prior Year Revenue 0 1,901,416 1,9019416 Revenues 0 1,901,416 1,901,416 Transfer Out to Fund 316 0 1,901,416 1,90 Expenditures 0 1,901,416 1190 The staffing level of the Police Department budget within the General Fund shall be increased from 132.2 full time employees (FTEs) to 134.2 FTEs in order to accommodate and permit the Department to fill vacancies created as a result of two law enforcement staff being assigned to other public agencies on a temporary basis through contract arrangements with those agencies. 2. The Parks Fund (Fund 101) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: Use of Prior Year Revenue Revenues PARK FUND (Fund 101) FY 2005 Original 2005 Budget 0 0 dty Services - Pest Mgmt. Program 94,300 Out to Fund 316 0 Amended 2005 Budget Chu 116,187 116,1 116,187 116,1 125,700 84,787 210,487 3 ORDINANCE NO. 3. The Street Fund (Fund 103) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: STREET FUND (Fund 103) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 322,576 322,576 Revenues 0 322,576 322,576 Out to Fund 316 0 322,576 3 Expenditures 0 322,576 3 4. The Community Services Block Grant Fund (Fund 104) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT FUND (Fund 104) FY 2005 Original Amended VENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change of Prior Year Revenue 0 23,700 23,700 Revenues 0 23,700 23,700 Improvement 0 23,700 23 Expenditures 0 23,700 23 5. The Library Fund (Fund 106) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: LIBRARY FUND (Fund 106) FY 2005 Original Amended VENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change of Prior Year Revenue 0 520,012 520,012. Revenues 0 520,012 520,012 Out to Fund 316 0 520,012 Expenditures 0 520,012 3 ORDINANCE NO. 6. The 1% for Art Fund (Fund 125) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: REVENUES Use of Prior Year Revenue Revenues 1% FOR ART FUND (Fund 125) FY 2005 Original 2005 Budget 50,000 50,000 comity Services Henry Moses Aquatic Center Art 0 Expenditures 0 Amended 2005 Budget 90,000 90,000 40 7. The Garage Capital Improvement Project Fund (Fund 301) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: GARAGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND (Fund 301) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 53,300 53,300 Revenues 0 53,300 53,300 EXPENDITURES Community Services Police Substation, Municipal Garage 0 53,300 53,300 Expenditures 0 53,300 53,300 8. The Leased City Properties Fund (Fund 306) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: LEASED CITY PROPERTIES FUND (Fund 306) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Chan e Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 100,000 100,000 Revenues 0 100,000 100,000 EXPENDITURES Community Services Chiller for 200 Mill Building 0 100,000 100,000 Expenditures 0 100,000 100,000 4 ORDINANCE NO. 9. The Municipal Facilities Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 316) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: MUNICIPAL FACILITIES CAPITAL H PROVEMENT FUND (Fund 316) FY 2005 Original Amended VENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Chan of Prior Year Revenue 1,386,500 5,193,200 3,806,7 isfer In — Fund 000 980,500 2,881,916 1,901,4 isfer In — Fund 101 0 84,787 84,7 tsfer In — Fund 103 0 322,576 322,5 isfer In — Fund 106 0 520,012 520,0 Revenues 2,367,000 9,002,491 6,635,4 ent — Defibrillators 0 132,000 132,000 uc Development Capital Reserve 0 2,828,791 2,828,791 Improvement 1,509,000 5,183,700 3,674 700 10. The Waterworks Utility Fund (Fund 401) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: WATERWORKS UTILITY FUND (Fund 401) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Chan Use of Prior Year Revenue 1,258,200 4,588,050 3,329,850 Revenues 1,258,200 4,588,050 3,329,850 EXPENDITURES Professional Services - Utility Rate Study 0 90,000 90,000 Transfer Out to Fund 421 1,731,000 4,970,850 3,239,850 Expenditures 1,731,000 5,060,850 3,329,850 11. The Airport Fund (Fund 402) is hereby amended to reflect the following Cr"10Us11 Pi a�d appropriation amendments: �n ask p solid Fu"d 1 r� �orfc�' 5 ORDINANCE NO. AIRPORT FUND (Fund 402) FY 2005 Original. Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Chan e Use of Prior Year Revenue 273,800 447,400 173,600 Revenues 273,800 447,400 173,600 EXPENDITURES Apron C Utility Improvements 0 173,600 173,600 Expenditures 0 173,600 173,600 12. The Solid Waste Utility Fund (Fund 403) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: SOLID WASTE UTILITY FUND (Fund 403) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change Solid Waste Fees 8,614,300 8,777,800 163,500 Grant Revenue 80,600 213,900 133,300 Use of Prior Year Revenue 212,700 449,200 236,500 Revenues 8,907,600 9,440,900 $33,300 EXPENDITURES Coordinated Prevention Grant 0 71,300 71,300 KC WR/R Grant Program 89,300 151,300 62,000 Clean Sweep Program 0 400,000 400,000 Expenditures 89,300 622,600 533,300 13. The Waterworks Utility Construction Fund (Fund 421) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: WATERWORKS UTILITY CONSTRUCTION FUND (Fund 421) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change Use of Prior Year Revenue 181,000 905,267 724,267 Transfer In from Fund 401 0 3,239,850 3,239,850 Transfer In from Fund 481 0 3,095,283 3,095,283 Revenues 181,000 7,240,400 7,059,400 EXPENDITURES Capital Improvement 1,509,000 8,568,400 7,059,400 Expenditures 1,509,000 8,568,400 7,059,400 M ORDINANCE NO. 14. The Municipal Golf Course System Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 424) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (Fund 424) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change Use of Prior Year Revenue 156,000 346,800 190,800 Transfer In from Fund 404 150,000 310,000 160,000 Revenues 306,000 656,800 350,800 EXPENDITURES Capital Improvement 310,000 660,800 350,800 Expenditures 310,000 660,800 350,800 15. The Waterworks Bond Fund (Fund 481) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: WATERWORKS BOND FUND (Fund 481) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Chan e Use of Prior Year Revenue 0 3,095,283 3,095,283 Revenues 0 3,095,283 3,095,283 EXPENDITURES Transfer Out to Fund 421 0 3,095,283 3,095,283 Expenditures 0 3,095,283 3,095,283 16. The Equipment Repair and Replacement Fund (Fund 501) is hereby amended to reflect the following appropriation amendments: EQUIPMENT REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FUND (Fund 501) FY 2005 Original Amended REVENUES 2005 Budget 2005 Budget Change Use of Prior Year Revenue 4,236,841 4,636,841 400,000 Revenues 4,236,841 4,636,841 400,000 EXPENDITURES Planning/Budding/Public Works New Fire Engine 918,600 1,318,600 400,000 Expenditures 918,600 1,318,600 400,000 VA ORDINANCE NO. SECTION H. A list of all individual budget adjustments and descriptions are hereby attached as Attachments A & B and are available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk, Renton City Hall. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five (5) days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: ORD. 1181:6/13/05:ma 8 Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk day of Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor 2005. 2005. 2004 to 2005 Carry Forwards Attachment A 2004 2005 2005 2005 Adjusted 2004 2004 Carry',rd Original Adjusted Project Title Budget Expense Balance Request Budget Budget Short Explanation/Reason Park Fund 101 1 Integrated Pest Management Program 141,300 113,147 28,153 31;400 94,300 125,700 Consultant under contract and money needed for contractual obligation. 101Total Carry ForwardRe4uest $31"400� $94,300 $125,700 CDBG Fund 104 _ 2 MultiService Center_ 30,000 6,310 23,690 -- <! 23,7001 0 23,700 To complete work that was delayed in 2004. 104_Total Car y`Ydi*ard Request °- $23;700 $0 $23,700 1 % Art Fund 125 3 Art for Henry Moses Aquatic Center 50,000 0 50,000 40,000 50,000 90,000 For design and creation of artwork at the Aquatic x Center. 125 Total Car6"; tward $50,000 $90,000 Garage Fund 301 4 Police Substation 101,500 48,129 53,371 it 0 53,300 Final building costs of the police substation at the m Municipal parking garage. 301 Total Car "`";?ForwardRe "nest b. tr 3• 'S53' 00 $0 $53,300 Leased City Properties Fund 306 5 Chiller Replacement at 200 Mill 300,000 64,624 235,376 100 000" 0 100,000 The chiller at 200 Mill was budgeted for in 2004 but completed in 2005. 306 Total^Ca `" Forward":Re oast $10,0-000 $0 $100,000 Municipal Facilities CIP Fund 316 6 7 8 9 10 11 Fire RMS Project 400,000 235,179 164,821 155;SOU 400,000 555,500 Three-year project had trouble meeting software delivery schedule. Maintenance Task Management 125,000 20,725 104,275 165`000 85,000 250,000 Consultant fees during vendor selection and implementation. Wireless Network Project 500,000 344,753 155,247 67;000- 0 67,000 Radio and antenna equipment installation on two n -y 4 h more water towers. Copier Replacement 75,000 102,683 -27 68316 il0tl, 90,000 106,000 New copier in Police Records needed. Parks Contingency Plan 95,000 0 95,000 r95 tl(ii` 0 95,000 Select design consultant. Re -master plan Cedar River Park, Liberty Park, and Narco property for r 'pz �. future development and expansion. Park Maintenance Facility 2,000,000 10,825 1,989,176 1,90-000 0 1,989,000 For property acquisition, site planning, and building design. 2005_Carryforward Attachment A Black & White.xls, 2004 - 2005 Carry Forward Page 1 of 4 2004 to 2005 Carry Forwards Attachment A 2004 `2005 2005 2005 Adjusted 2004 2004 Car Forwi, Original Adjusted Project Title Budget Expense Balancer Request Budget Budget Short Explanation/Reason 12 Major Maintenance Parks 737,500 219,187 518,313 445,900 430,000 875,900 Projects to maintain city parks and amenities in a safegood working order. 13 Major Maintenance Operational Facilities 38,000 0 38,000 38,000 157,000 195,000 FSI I Alarm $20k FSI I drainage $18k . 14 Major Maintenance Public Facilities 656,000 180,573 475,427 466,30,0 172,000 638,300 City Hall resurfacing of P3, single storage building at RCC Public Restroom refurbishment. 15 Parks Long Range Plan 24,600 0 24,600 24,600 25,000 49,600 To complete long-range plan to meet state grant requirements and identify future acquisition and development. 16 Major Maintenance Museum 25,000 220 24,780 0 000 0 20,000 Intrusion and fire alarms stem at Museum. 17 Neighborhood Beautification 27,100 2,857 24,243 25.000 0 25,000 Consultant under contract to complete tree inventory and assessment. 18 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail 126,700 552 126,148 100,000 226,200 Consultant services to complete conceptual design phase and easement negotiation. 19 Neighborhood Grants 50,000 20,723 29,2772 200 50,000 91,200 This amount covers prior grant commitments. 316 Total Ca ."`rForwuril`R nest:;-$3`°64700 $1,509,000 $5,183,700 Airport Fund 402 20 Apron C Utility Improvements Solid Waste Utility Fund 403 21 Coordinated Prevention Grant 22 KC WR/R Grant Program Waterworks Utility Fund 421 23 Sanitary Sewer Main Extension 740,700 567,057 173,643 79,700 8,487 71,213 89,300 27,320 61,980 3,450,000 798,360 2,651,640 24 Lift Station Replacement/Rehabilitation 720,000 439,409 280,591 0 173,600 Contract with Potelco will be closed out in 2005. The gas utility portion of the project still needs to be completed when Pilchuck decides to complete the proiect. $0 $173,600 0 71,300 CPG is a two year grant cycle. All funds were budgeted in 1 st year of cycle. 89,300 151,300 WRR grant is a two year grant. Funds are budgeted each year based on MKCC approval of KCSWD Budget. $89,300 $222,600 2,000,000 4,650,000 Sunset Interceptor Phase I1(2,200,000) has construction delays of approximately 6-months. Central Plateau Interceptor (450,000) is also delayed due to King Countv. 0 280,000 Lake Washington Flush and Misty Cove Lift 2005_Carryforward Attachment A Black & White.xls, 2004 - 2005 Carry Forward Page 2 of 4 2004 to 2005 Carry Forwards Attachment A 2004 2005 2005 2005 Adjusted 2004 2004 Carry Forward Original Adjusted Project Title Budget Expense Balance Request Budget Budget Short Explanation/Reason 25 Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement 1,215,000 317,637 897,363 850,000 250,000 1,100,000 Covers projects we were not able to complete: Downtown Sewers (240,000), Earlington Sewer Extension (370,000), Sanitary Sewer Model (100,000), and Renton Center Extension 140 000 . 26 Maplewood Water Rights 30,000 5,340 24,660 24,600 10,000 34,600 To complete contract work started in 2004. 27 Pipe Oversizing Costs 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 80,000 For payment to developers for projects started in 2004 28 Water Telemetry Systems Improvements 93,000 73,192 19,808 . 19,800 0 19,800 To complete contract work started in 2004. 29 Water System Plan Update 146,000 102,662 43,338 -" -= 43 300 50,000 93,300 To complete contract work started in 2004. 30 Update Emergency Response Plan 71,000 21,309 49,691 `49 600 5,000 54,600 To complete contract work started in 2004. 31 Water Main Rehabilitation 1,432,000 1,035,972 396,028 396,00 1,000,000 1,396,000 To complete contract work started in 2004. 32 Update Fireflow Analysis 10,000 5,278 4,722 431 00 5 000 9,700 To complete contract work started in 2004. 33 Reservoir Recoating 4 000 0 4,000 0 4,000 To complete contract work started in 2004. 34 Emergency Response Projects 50,000 1,198 48,802 48 800 50,000 98,800 To complete contract work started in 2004. 35 Large Meter Replacement 20,000 0 20,000 'p "~20`000 0 20,000 To complete contract work started in 2004. 36 Downtown Core Rehabilitation 253,000 103,242 149,758 149,700 0 149,700 To complete contract work started in 2004. 37 Water Quality Monitoring 10,000 3,619 6,381 6,300 10,000 16,300 To complete contract work started in 2004. 38 Water Pump Stations Rehabilitation 15,000 3,555 11,445 % 11,40 0 11,400 To complete contract work started in 2004. 39 Maplewood Water Treatment 8,000,000 6,438,754 1,561,246 :.. ; ' 1 561,200 3,100,000 4,661,200 To complete contract work started in 2004. Improvements Construction 40 Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan 218,000 14,506 203,494 203;000 0 203,000 Project delayed due to Ecology's failure to issue Kx the NPDES Phase 2 permit requirements. 41 Small Drainage Problems 225,000 54,430 170,570 170,000 180,000 350,000 The project construction to replace sewer, water, and storm systems was delayed to avoid project construction to occur during the winter and the 2004 holiday season. 42 Lower Cedar River Sediment Management 292,000 258,232 33,768 , >3Ux000 275,000 305,000 Spawning Channel Replacement Project was Program ;" delayed due to the lack of federal funding for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to construct the project. 43 Cedar River Basin CIP - Floodplain 12,500 5,487 7,013 ._=7;000 0 7,000 Consultant Contract work was delayed due to Mapping USACE failure to provide levee certification needed for the update of the flood lain map. 44 Renton Stormwater Manual 143,000 575 142,425 542,000 0 142,000 Work was delayed due to Ecology's failure to issue rr the NPDES Phase 2 permit requirements. 45 Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map 108,200 68,351 39,849 :''--`35;000 0 35,000 To complete contract work started in 2004. 46 May Creek Basin Plan Implementation 198,000 41,240 156,760 '.` 155,000 275,000 430,000 To complete design and construct project in 2005. 2005_Carryforward Attachment A_Black & White.xls, 2004 - 2005 Carry Forward Page 3 of 4 2004 to 2005 Carry Forwards Attachment A 2004 2005 2005 Adjusted 2004 2004arry,Votvard Original Adjusted Project Title Budget Expense Balancer f" Request Budget Budget Short Explanation/Reason 47 SW 7th Storm System 3,407,500 2,971,833 435,667 158 900 400,000 558,000 Project construction started later than planned and 9 the construction took longer than planned. 421 Total Carry Forward Re ueq, :.` S7 059,400 $7,650,000 $14,709,400 Municipal Golf Course System Capital Improvement Fund 424 48 Parking Stall Addition/Cart Path Paving 355,400 144,590 210,810 2108Q0 145,000 355,800 Project includes lighting, landscaping, netting and storm water detention for future maintenance facility. 49 Major Maintenance Golf Course 140,000 0 140,000 144;000 165,000 305,000 Driving Range Netting replacement, Driving U, 0 a; Range turf carpet repair to be completed in 2005. 424 Total"Car ,` oxwird:Re ue n , ., $350 800 $310,000 $660,800 Equipment Repair and Replacement Fund 501 50 New Fire Engine 1,027,800 501 Ordinance No. 5110 Original Budget $150,349,200 Ordinance No. 5134 PBPWI ransm otarionArimciidment* , „ 38300 Ordinance No. Carry Forward Budget Amendment 12,040,200 2005 Committed Expenditures $164 771700 5 918,600 1,318,600 New fire $918,600 $1,318,600 #Currenjlyetiding,City-CounciI apprdval-' ; delivery delayed to 2005. 2005_Carryforward Attachment A Black & White.xls, 2004 - 2005 Carry Forward Page 4 of 4 Attachment B 2004 to 2005 Carry Forward Ordinance Title and Description Amount 1 Integrated Pest Management Program (Community Services) $31,400 Funds were transferred from EDNSP to Parks Professional Services in 2004 for the Integrated Pest Management Program. Consultant is under contract and money is needed to complete contractual obligation. 2 MultiService Center (Community Services) $23,700 Necessary to complete the MultiService Center due to delays in starting the program. 3 Art for Henry Moses Aquatic Center (Community Services) $40,000 For design and creation of art for the Henry Moses Aquatic Center. 4 Police Substation (Community Services) $53,300 To complete work on the Police Substation (which was finished in February). 5 Chiller for 200 Mill (Community Services) $100,000 The replacement of the chiller for 200 Mill building was completed in 2005. Expenses include elevators and gates. 6 Fire RMS Project (Finance and Information Services) $155,500 This project involves a number of different project elements and was planned as a three- year effort. During the second year, 2004, they had trouble meeting the project's software delivery schedule. 7 Maintenance Task Management (Finance and Information Services) $165,000 The enterprise -wide project team has completed the project specification and the project is awaiting responses to an RFP. This carry forward request represents unpaid consultant fees that will be used during vendor selection and implementation. 8 Wireless Network Project (Finance and Information Services) $67,000 This project has two remaining elevated water towers to which radio and antenna equipment must be installed. The equipment will be installed in early 2005. 9 Copier Replacement (Finance and Information Services) $16,000 This project replaces the Richo, which is well over five years old. This copier is in service 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, by the police records staff. There was no upgrade plan contained in the 2005 budget request; however, replacing this copier will provide an opportunity to improve the records process by utilizing the new copier's built-in email system to transmit records electronically rather than hard copy. 10 Parks Contingency Plan (Community Services) Select design consultant. Re -master plan Cedar River Park, Liberty Park and Narco property for future development and expansion including developing and integrating a public involvement process. 11 New Maintenance Facility (Community Services) In 2004, $2,000,000 was appropriated as designated fund balance for property acquisition, site planning and building design; of this amount, only $11,000 was spent. 12 Major Maintenance Parks (Community Services) Projects to maintain City parks and amenities in a safe, good working order. Kiwanis Park Playground $7,374, Sunset Court Play equipment replacement $7,071; Jones Park Play Equipment replacement $6,768; Kennydale Beach Play equipment replacement $67,348; Liberty Park building removal $32,400; Coulon Park Launch Lanes 1-4 Repairs $52,838; Coulon Gang Ways Replacement $185,091; and Edlund Property Demolition $87,010. $95,000 $1,989,000 $445,900 Page 1 of 4 Attachment B 2004 to 2005 Carry Forward Ordinance Title and Description Amount 13 Major Maintenance Operational Facilities (Community Services) $38,000 Fire Station 11 alarm and sprinklers ($20,000), Fire Station I 1 drain replacement ($18,000). 14 Major Maintenance Public Facilities (Community Services) $466,300 City Hall resurfacing of P3 $205,000 (Three components: Water mitigation $30,000, Actual resurfacing $150,000, Restoring irrigation $25,000). City Hall Major Maintenance and small projects $41,300. Renton Community Center, single storage building $100,000. Public Restroom Refurbishment $120,000. 15 Parks Long Range Plan (Community Services) $24,600 Necessary to complete long-range plan to meet state grant requirements and identify future acquisition and development. Anticipate hiring consultant in first quarter 2005. 16 Major Maintenance Museum (Community Services) $20,000 Intrusion and fire alarm system at the Museum. 17 Neighborhood Beautification (Community Services) $25,000 Consultant under contract to complete tree inventory and assessment, park tree inventory, natural and open space tree inventory, and a strategic plan. 18 Sam Chastain Waterfront Trail (Community Services) $126,200 Necessary for consultant services to complete conceptual design phase and easement negotiation. 19 Neighborhood Grants (Economic Development) There are two grant cycles each year. Some of the funds granted, especially in the fall cycle, are not spent until the following year. This carry forward amount covers prior grant commitments. 20 Apron C Utility Improvements (PB/PW —Transportation) Contract with Potelco will be closed out in 2005. The gas utility portion of the project still needs to be completed when Pilchuck decides to complete the project. 21 Coordinated Prevention Grant (PB/PW-Solid Waste) CPG is a two-year grant cycle. All funds were budgeted in first year cycle with intent to carry forward unspent funds. 22 KC WR/R Grant Program (PB/PW-Solid Waste) WRR Grant is a two-year grant. Funds are budgeted each year based on MKCC approval of KCSWD Budget. Unspent funds from 2004 may be carried forward under grant agreement. $41,200 $173,600 $71,300 $62,000 23 Sanitary Sewer Main Extension (PB/PW-Wastewater) $2,650,000 Sunset Interceptor Phase 11($2,200,000) has construction delays of approximately six months, requiring the construction funds to be carried forward. Central Plateau Interceptor ($450,000) is also delayed due to King County's bridge work causing construction to continue into 2005. 24 Lift Station Replacement/Rehabilitation (PB/PW-Wastewater) $280,000 Lake Washington Flush and Misty Cove Lift Station Rehabilitation was delayed. Funds carried forward are to cover construction costs for 2005. 25 Sanitary Sewer Main Replacement (P/B/PW-Wastewater) $850,000 Carry forward covers projects that were not competed including Downtown Sewers ($240,000), Earlington Sewer Extension ($370,000), Sanitary Sewer Model ($100,000), and Renton Center Extension ($140,000). Primary reason for delay is due to unplanned work associated with development of Lakeshore Landing and FRB site. Page 2 of 4 Attachment B 2004 to 2005 Carry Forward Ordinance Title and Description Amount 26 Maplewood Water Rights (PB/PW-Water) $24,600 To Complete contract work started in 2004. 27 Pipe Oversizing Costs (PB/PW-Water) $40,000 For payment to developers for projects started in 2004. 28 Water Telemetry Systems Improvements (PB/PW-Water) $19,800 To complete contract work started in 2004. 29 Water System Plan Update (PB/PW-Water) $43,300 To complete contract work started in 2004. 30 Update Emergency Response Plan (PB/PW-Water) $49,600 To complete contract work started in 2004. 31 Water Main Rehabilitation (PB/PW-Water) $396,000 To complete contract work started in 2004. 32 Update Fireflow Analysis (PB/PW-Water) $4,700 To complete contract work started in 2004. 33 Reservoir Recoating (PB/PW-Water) $4,000 To complete contract work started in 2004. 34 Emergency Response Projects (PB/PW-Water) $48,800 To complete contract work started in 2004. 35 Large Meter Replacement (PB/PW-Water) $20,000 To complete contract work started in 2004. 36 Downtown Core Rehabilitation (PB/PW-Water) $149,700 To complete contract work started in 2004. 37 Water Quality Monitoring (PB/PW-Water) $6,300 To complete contract work started in 2004. 38 Water Pump Stations Rehabilitation (PB/PW-Water) $11,400 To complete contract work started in 2004. 39 Maplewood Water Treatment Improvements Construction (PB/PW-Water) To complete contract work started in 2004. 40 Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan (PB/PW-Surface Water) Project delayed due to the Department of Ecology's failure to issue the NPDES Phase 2 permit requirements, which will identify required new programs that need to be reviewed in conjunction with all programs. $1,561,200 $203,000 41 Small Drainage Problems (PB/PW-Surface Water) $170,000 The project construction to replace sewer, water and storm systems in Wells Ave. S. and Williams Ave. S., between S. 2nd St. and S 3`d St., was delayed to avoid project construction occurring during the winter and the 2004 holiday season. Project construction will start in spring of 2005. Page 3 of 4 Attachment B 2004 to 2005 Carry Forward Ordinance Title and Description Amount 42 Lower Cedar River Sediment Management Program (PB/PW-Surface Water) $30,000 Spawning Channel Replacement project was delayed due to the lack of federal funding for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to construct the project. The carry forward request is needed to fund anticipated City costs associated with the construction of the Spawning Channel Replacement Project in the summer of 2005, assuming the federal funding for the project is provided to the USACE. 43 Cedar River Basin CIP — Floodplain Mapping (PB/PW-Surface Water) $7,000 Consultant Contract work was delayed due to USACE failure to provide Levee certification needed for the update of the floodplain map. Final report and maps to be produced in 2005. 44 Renton Storm water Manual (PB/PW-Surface Water) $142,000 Work was delayed due to the Department of Ecology's failure to issue the NPDES Phase 2 permit requirements, which would identify standards for storm water management that would have to be included in a design manual. 45 Springbrook Creek Floodplain Map Update (PB/PW-Surface Water) $35,000 Consultant contract work to finalize the hydraulic model and produce the draft floodplain work map took longer than planned, which delayed the completion of the project in 2004. Funding is being carried forward to complete the remaining work in 2005. 46 May Creek Basin Plan Implementation (PB/PW-Surface Water) $155,000 Funding is being carry forward to complete design and construct project in 2005, if required permits and access rights are obtained. 47 SW 71e Storm System (PB/PW-Surface Water) $158,000 Project construction started later than planned and the construction took longer than planned. Funding is being carried forward to fund the completion of the project construction. 48 Parking Stall Addition/Cart Path Paving (Community Services) $210,800 This project, which includes lighting, landscaping, netting and storm water detention for future maintenance facility, is in conjuncture with the Water Utility Department's construction of the Maplewood Water Treatment Facility. All work will be completed in 2005. 49 Major Maintenance Golf Course (Community Services) $140,000 The driving range netting replacement and driving range turf carpet repair will be completed in 2005. Access to portions of the project will not be available until completion of current water treatment facility construction. 50 New Fire Engine (PB/PW-Equipment Repair and Replacement) $400,000 Due to major hurricanes, the delivery of the new Fire Engine (pumper) was moved back to mid -March 2005. Page 4 of 4 FUND BALANCES AFTER CARRY FORWARD ORDINANCE revised: 05117105 GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Attachment C 201 207 215 TOTAL 000 007 010 101 103 106 LTGO LTGO LTGO GENERAL GENERAL GARAGE MEMORIAL PARK STREET LIBRARY City Hall Senior Ctr Misc GOVERNMT'L + 1/1/2004 Beg FB 6,164,584 - - 1,625,841 891,151 246,418 13,536 25,057 1,018,824 9,985,411 + 2004 Act Revenues 46,599,703 149,442 31,153 9,678,105 5,862,686 1,953,727 654,730 29,148 1,788,896 66,747,590 - 2004 Actual Expenditures (46,081,936) (34,686) - (10,350,791) (5,925,665) (1,560,557) (652,460) (27,175) (2,211,875) (66,845,145) = 2004 Ending Fund Balance 6,682,351 114,756 31,153 953,155 828,172 639,588 15,806 27,030 595,845 9,887,856 + 2005 Budgeted Revenues 46,874,100 - - 10,462,100 6,283,500 1,494,700 654,300 35,900 1,866,300 67,670,900 - 2005 Budgeted Expenditures (47,933,500) (70,000) - (10,462,100) (6,286,200) (1,494,700) (654,300) (35,900) (1,866,300) (68,803,000) Fund Balance 5,622,951 44,756 31,153 953,155 825,472 639,588 15,806 27,030 595,845 8,755,756 8% Reserve/Reserves (3,721,535) (44,756) (31,153) (836,968) (502,896) (119,576) (15,806) (27,030) (595,845) (5,895,565) Available Fund Balance 1,901,416 - - 116,187 322,576 520,012 - - - 2,860,191 Carry Forwards - - - (31,400) - - - - - (31,400) REMAINING FUND BALANCE 1,901,416 - - 84,787 322,576 520,012 - - - 2,828,791 - Proposed Transfer Out (1,901,416) - - (84,787) (322,576) (520,012) - - - (2,828,791) Page 1 of 6 FUND BALANCES AFTER CARRY FORWARD ORDINANCE revised: 05/17/05 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS TOTAL 102 104 110 118 125 127 131 SPECIAL Arterial St CDBG Hotel/Motel Resv Path/Tr 1% Art Cable Com Parks Gifts REVENUE + 1/1/2004 Beg FB 161,026 19,321 244,111 2,807 96,413 196,137 50,000 769,815 + 2004 Act Revenues 396,893 297,833 217,142 19 5,428 38,524 50,690 1,006,529 - 2004 Actual Expenditures (353,500) (288,520) (206,405) (3,293) (29,223) (880,941) = 2004 Ending Fund Balance 204,419 28,634 254,848 2,826 98,548 205,438 100,690 895,403 + 2005 Budgeted Revenues 353,500 314,500 220,000 - - 38,900 - 926,900 - 2005 Budgeted Expenditures (353,500) (314,500) (220,000) - (50,000) (38,900) - (976,900) Fund Balance 204,419 28,634 254,848 2,826 48,548 205,438 100,690 845,403 8% Reserve/Reserves (204,419) (4,934) (254,848) (2,826) - (200,000) (100,690) (767,717) Available Fund Balance Carry Forwards 23,700 (23,700) 48,548 5,438 (40,000) - 77,686 (63,700) REMAINING FUND BALANCE - - - 8,548 5,438 - 13,986 !. Attachment C Page 2 of 6 FUND BALANCES AFTER CARRY FORWARD ORDINANCE revised: 05117105 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 219 220 DEBT SERVICE ugob-Sr Housirn LID Debt S FUNDS + 1/1/2004 Beg FB 574,513 30,690 605,203 + 2004 Act Revenues 526,022 25,083 551,105 - 2004 Actual Expenditures (527,874) (12,585) (540,459) = 2004 Ending Fund Balance 572,661 43,188 615,849 + 2005 Budgeted Revenues 519,100 9,500 528,600 - 2005 Budgeted Expenditures (519,100) (12,800) (531,900) = Fund Balance 572,661 39,888 612,549 - 8% Reserve/Reserves (572,661) (39,888) (612,549) = Available Fund Balance - - - - Carry ForwardsREMAINING - - - FUND BALANCE Attachment C Page 3 of 6 FUND BALANCES AFTER CARRY FORWARD ORDINANCE revised: 05117105 CONSTRUCTION FUNDS Attachment C TOTAL 301 303 304 305 306 307 316 317 CAPITAL Garage Com Dev Mit Fire Mit Transp Mit Ls City Prop Swim Pool CIP Transp CIP FUNDS 1/1/2004 Beg FB 2,041,114 1,060,080 1,498,202 3,859,186 158,244 1,231,412 4,978,135 8,291,896 23,118,269 + 2004 Act Revenues 1,688 515,035 840,108 1,058,156 1,060,542 62,337 7,150,657 7,527,568 18,216,091 - 2004 Actual Expenditures (1,869,810) (1,274,704) (1,596,136) (721,000) (567,111) (1,116,359) (2,894,625) (5,280,288) (15,320,033) = 2004 Ending Fund Balance 172,992 300,411 742,174 4,196,342 651,675 177,390 9,234,167 10,539,176 26,014,327 + 2005 Budgeted Revenues - 255,000 300,000 600,000 446,700 - 2,948,500 6,145,200 10,695,400 - 2005 Budgeted Expenditures - - (300,000) (1,313,400) (446,700) - (4,335,000) (7,986,500) (14,381,600) = Fund Balance 172,992 555,411 742,174 3,482,942 651,675 177,390 7,847,667 8,697,876 22,328,127 - 8% Reserve/Reserves - - - - - - (3,616,000) - (3,616,000) = Available Fund Balance 172,992 555,411 742,174 3,482,942 651,675 177,390 4,231,667 8,697,876 18,712,127 - Carry Forwards (53,300) - - - (100,000) - (3,674,700) (8,697,876) (12,525,876) - New Programs - - - - - - (132,000) - (132,000) REMAINING is •r + Proposed Transfer In 2,828,791 2,828,791 Page 4 of 6 FUND BALANCES AFTER CARRY FORWARD ORDINANCE revised: 05117105 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Attachment C TOTAL 401 402 403 404 421 424 451 461 481 ENTERPRISE WW Utility Airport Solid Waste Golf Course WW Constr Golf CIP WW Rev Bond WS Reserve 2004 WS Bond FUNDS 1/1/2004 Beg FB 4,965,150 2,344,624 885,911 1,362,027 1,165,903 403,778 129,020 2,606,852 - 11,256,413 + 2004 Act Revenues 22,076,192 1,320,600 8,983,953 2,189,791 13,148,034 273,579 2,496,666 - 10,591,010 61,079,825 - 2004 Actual Expenditures (20,173,202) (1,321,644) (8,571,929) (2,255,713) (13,408,670) (320,233) (2,513,803) - (7,495,727) (56,060,921) = 2004 Ending Fund Balance 6,868,140 2,343,580 1,297,935 1,296,105 905,267 357,124 111,883 2,606,852 3,095,283 16,275,317 + 2005 Budgeted Revenues 22,724,100 1,686,200 8,866,000 2,321,200 9,269,000 154,000 3,049,800 - - 48,070,300 - 2005 Budgeted Expenditures (23,982,300) (1,960,000) (9,078,700) (2,321,200) (9,450,000) (310,000) (3,012,100) - - (50,114,300) = Fund Balance 5,609,940 2,069,780 1,085,235 1,296,105 724,267 201,124 149,583 2,606,852 3,095,283 16,838,169 - 8% Reserve/Reserves (1,412,232) (1,896,180) (726,300) (589,742) - - - (2,606,852) - (7,231,306) = Available Fund Balance 4,197,708 173,600 358,935 706,363 724,267 201,124 149,583 - 3,095,283 9,606,863 + New Revenues - - 296,800 - - - - - - 296,800 - Carry Forwards (3,239,850) (173,600) (133,300) (160,000) (724,267) (190,800) - - (3,095,283) (7,717,100) - New Programs (90,000) - (400,000) - - - - - - (490,000) REMAINING • Page 5 of 6 FUND BALANCES AFTER CARRY FORWARD ORDINANCE revised: 05117105 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS TOTAL 501 502 512 522 601 INTERNAL SVC Equip R&R Insurance Active Health LEOFF Health Fire Pens FUNDS 1/1/2004 Beg FB 3,418,397 7,611,589 - - 5,133,314 16,163,300 + 2004 Act Revenues 2,888,431 3,988,755 6,713,830 990,110 224,531 14,805,657 - 2004 Actual Expenditures (2,220,686) (3,656,234) (5,407,028) (760,624) (381,723) (12,426,295) 2004 Ending Fund Balance 4,086,142 7,944,110 1,306,802 229,486 4,976,122 18,542,662 + 2005 Budgeted Revenues 3,176,900 2,883,800 6,472,500 1,282,000 160,000 13,975,200 - 2005 Budgeted Expenditures (3,026,200) (3,549,300) (6,490,400) (1,359,900) (672,300) (15,098,100) Fund Balance 4,236,842 7,278,610 1,288,902 151,586 4,463,822 17,419,762 Anti Recessionary Reserve (2,100,000) (2,100,000) South Renton Reserve (660,000) (660,000) Health Reserve (1,115,600) (199,000) (1,314,600) 8% Reserve/Reserves (3,377,944) (4,518,610) (4,463,822) (12,360,376) Available Fund Balance 858,898 Carry Forwards (400,000) 173,302 (47,414) 984,786 (400,000) Attachment C Page 6 of 6