Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil 02/28/2005if
AGENDA
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
February 28, 2005
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PROCLAMATION: Red Cross Month - March, 2005
4. SPECIAL PRESENTATION: Community Services Department Employee Recognition
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. Petition for vacation of portions of Bremerton Ave. NE between NE 2nd and NE 3rd Streets
(Petitioner: Liberty Ridge LLC)
b. 2004 City Code Title IV (Development Regulations) docket and related amendments
6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
7. AUDIENCE COMMENT (Speakers must sign up prior to the Council meeting. Each speaker is
allowed five minutes. The comment period will be limited to one-half hour. The second audience
comment period later on in the agenda is unlimited in duration.)
When you are recognized by the Presiding Officer, please walk to the podium and state your name
and address for the record, SPELLING YOUR LAST NAME.
8. CONSENT AGENDA
The following items are distributed to Councilmembers in advance for study and review, and the
recommended actions will be accepted in a single motion. Any item may be removed for further
discussion if requested by a Councilmember.
a. Approval of Council meeting minutes of February 14, 2005. Council concur.
b. City Clerk reports receipt of $16,500 compensation paid by petitioner, as set by Council on
10/25/2004, and recommends adoption of an ordinance to finalize the Conner Homes vacation of
portions of 140th Ave. SE, between SE 132nd St. and SE 136th St.; VAC-04-001. Council
concur. (See 1 La. for ordinance.)
c. City Clerk reports bid opening on 2/22/2005 for CAG-05-008, Lake Washington Blvd. Slip
Plane; seven bids; engineer's estimate $436,860; and submits staff recommendation to award the
contract to the low bidder, Northwest Cascade, Inc., in the amount of $440,000. Council concur.
d. Court Case filed on behalf of Boeing Employees Flying Association, Inc. by Philip T. Mattern,
Demco Law Firm, P.S., 5224 Wilson Ave. S., Suite 200, Seattle, 98118, regarding the removal of
underground fuel tanks from leased property at the Renton Airport. Refer to City Attorney and
Insurance Services.
e. Community Services Department recommends approval of the emergency repair of two elevators
located at the 200 Mill Building in the amount of $38,156.16. Council concur.
f. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department submits 60% Notice
of Intent to annex petition for the proposed Wedgewood Lane Annexation, and recommends a
public hearing be set on 3/14/2005 to consider the petition and future zoning; 25.63 acres located
between 144th Ave. SE and 148th Ave. SE. Council concur.
g. Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department recommends the
appointment of Kim Hart, general manager of the TownePlace Suites and SpringHill Suites by
Marriott, to the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee to fill the vacancy left by Terry Godat.
Council concur.
(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)
h. Legal Division recommends adoption of an ordinance that amends City Code Chapter 6-1,
Abandoned Vehicles, by adding definitions, expanding the scope of junk vehicles to include parts
thereof, adding explanatory language, and criminalizing violations. Refer to Public Safety
Committee.
i. Municipal Court requests authorization to hire a Probation Officer at Step D of the salary range.
Refer to Finance Committee.
j. Utility Systems Division requests approval of a consultant agreement with Golder Associates,
Inc. in the amount of $99,396.12 to implement the 2005 Monitoring Plan for the Cedar River
Section 205 Flood Damage Control project. Council concur.
9. CORRESPONDENCE
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Topics listed below were discussed in Council committees during the past week. Those topics
marked with an asterisk (*) may include legislation. Committee reports on any topics may be held by
the Chair if further review is necessary.
a. Finance Committee: Vouchers; Information Management Services Agreement with GM2
Systems; Claims Processing Fee Schedule with Healthcare Management Administrators
b. Planning & Development Committee: R-1 Zone Community Separators; Critical Areas
Ordinance
c. Transportation (Aviation) Committee: Bruce Levin Airport Lease Addendum; Kaynan, Inc.
Airport Lease Addendum; Bosair, LLC Airport Lease Addendum; I-405/SR-167 Interchange 5%
Design Concurrence Letter with WSDOT; I-405 Mainline Alignment Concurrence Letter with
WSDOT
d. Utilities Committee: Springbrook Creek Wetland & Habitat Mitigation Bank Concurrence Letter
with WSDOT
11. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Ordinances for first reading:
a. Vacation of portions of 140th Ave. SE; petitioner Conner Homes (see 8.b.)
b. Medical Institution definition amendment (Council approved 2/7/2005)
Ordinances for second and final reading:
a. Service fees for special water meter read services (1st reading 2/14/2005)
b. Service fees for utility outstanding balance searches (1st reading 2/14/2005)
12. NEW BUSINESS (Includes Council Committee agenda topics; call 425-430-6512 for recorded
information.)
13. AUDIENCE COMMENT
:O • 1:►ul
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
AGENDA
(Preceding Council Meeting)
Renton Transit Center
6:30 p.m.
Tour of Police Sub -Station
• Hearing assistance devices for use in the Council Chambers are available upon request to the City Clerk •
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED LIVE ON GOVERNMENT ACCESS CHANNEL 21 AND ARE RE-CABLECAST
TUES. & THURS. AT 11:00 AM & 9:00 PM, WED. & FRI. AT 9:00 AM & 7:00 PM AND SAT. & SUN. AT 1:00 PM & 9:00 PM
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
February 28, 2005
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF
TERRI BRIERE, Council President; DENIS LAW; DAN CLAWSON; TONI
COUNCILMEMBERS
NELSON; RANDY CORMAN; DON PERSSON; MARCIE PALMER.
CITY STAFF IN
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; LAWRENCE J. WARREN, City
ATTENDANCE
Attorney; BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; SANDRA MEYER, Transportation
Systems Director; MIKE STENHOUSE, Maintenance Services Director;
DAVE CHRISTENSEN, Utility Engineering Supervisor; KAREN
MCFARLAND, Engineering Specialist; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic
Development Administrator; DENNIS CULP, Community Services
Administrator; PETER RENNER, Facilities Director; SYLVIA ALLEN,
Recreation Director; KAREN BERGSVIK, Human Services Manager; DEREK
TODD, Assistant to the CAO; COMMANDER FLOYD ELDRIDGE, Police
Department.
PROCLAMATION
A proclamation by Mayor Keolker-Wheeler was read declaring the month of
Red Cross Month - March,
March, 2005, to be "Red Cross Month" in the City of Renton and urging all
2005
citizens to join in this special observance. The American Red Cross serving
King and Kitsap Counties reaches out to those whose lives have been touched
by adversity and helps thousands of others prevent and prepare for crises yet to
come. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL
CONCUR IN THE PROCLAMATION AS READ. CARRIED. Red Cross
volunteer Vicki Lee accepted the proclamation.
SPECIAL PRESENTATION
Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator, explained that the
Community Services:
Community Services Department employee recognition committee is comprised
Employee Recognition
of employees who select quarter and annual individual and team awardees. He
introduced Facilities Director Peter Renner who announced the 2004 employee
and team recognition awards as follows:
Employee of the First Quarter: Janice Bicknell, Library Technical Assistant
Employee of the Second Quarter: Dianne Utecht, CDBG Specialist
Employee of the Third Quarter: Ryan Spencer, Office Assistant III
(Community Center)
Employee of the Fourth Quarter: Teresa Nishi, Recreation Specialist 1
Team of the Second Quarter: Facilities Technical Staff - Dennis Conte, Tanya
Carey, Warner Curl, Sam Kamphaus, Dennis Murdoch, Casey Pearson, and
Paul Youngedyk
Team of the Third Quarter: Senior Center Staff - Shawn Daly, Debbie Little,
Wendy Kirschner, Bobbi Lane, and Patty Wills
Team of the Fourth Quarter: Parks Maintenance Staff at Gene Coulon Park -
John Akerlund, Mark Berry, Ernest Flowers, Dale Hall, Patricia Hunter,
Rebecca H. Johnson, Jeff Nasset, and David J. Peterson
February 28, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 59
Mr. Renner also announced that Ryan Spencer was chosen as the 2004
Employee of the Year, and the Facilities Technical Team was chosen as the
2004 Team of the Year.
PUBLIC HEARINGS This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Vacation: Bremerton Ave NE, accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
Liberty Ridge, VAC-04-007 public hearing to consider the petition to vacate three portions of Bremerton
Ave. NE, located south of NE 4th St. and north of SE 2nd PI. (Liberty Ridge
LLC; VAC-04-007).
Karen McFarland, Engineering Specialist, explained that the petitioner plans to
use the subject vacation area in the proposed Elmhurst Plat to create a uniform
half -street right-of-way width along the western half of Bremerton Ave. NE.
She noted that the vacation area does not contain any City facilities. Ms.
McFarland reported that the vacation request was circulated to various City
departments and outside agencies for review and no objections were raised.
Continuing, Ms. McFarland pointed out that both the Transportation Systems
Division and the Development Services Division recommended that a 25-foot
right-of-way width from the road centerline be maintained. She stated that staff
recommends approval of the vacation subject to the two northerly portions
being set to a maximum vacation width of 12.5 feet to allow for the 25-foot
right-of-way width, and subject to the petitioner providing satisfactory proof
that outside utilities are satisfied with any easements necessary to protect their
facilities.
Public comment was invited.
David Halinen, 10500 NE 8th St., Suite 1900, Bellevue, 98004, representing the
petitioner Liberty Ridge LLC, expressed agreement with the conditions as
recommended by staff and urged Council to approve the vacation proposal.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE REQUEST TO VACATE THREE PORTIONS OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
ALONG BREMERTON AVE. NE SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS: THE TWO NORTHERLY PORTIONS OF THE ORIGINAL
REQUEST BE SET TO A MAXIMUM VACATION WIDTH OF 12.5 FEET,
AND THE PETITIONER PROVIDE SATISFACTORY PROOF THAT
OUTSIDE UTILITIES HAVE RECEIVED AND ARE SATISFIED WITH
ANY EASEMENTS NECESSARY TO PROTECT THEIR FACILITIES IN
THE VACATION AREA. CARRIED.
Planning: Development This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
Regulations (Title IV) 2004 accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
Docket & Amendments public hearing to consider the 2004 City Code Title IN (Development
Regulations) Docket and related amendments.
Alex Pietsch, Economic Development Administrator, explained that the
purpose of the Title IV Docket is to consider annual zoning code text
amendments proposed by both applicants and the City of Renton. The City
reviews the text amendments as a group once a year, although some items may
February 28, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 60
be the subject of separate work programs. He introduced Lisa Grueter,
consultant with the land use consulting firm Jones & Stokes Associates, who
reviewed the ten amendment requests.
Lisa Grueter stated that the proposed changes to Title IV, Chapter 1, include:
cleaning up long-standing inconsistency, interpretation, and organization
issues; addressing school impact fees by consolidating subsections and
removing provisions that are more suitable for the interlocal agreement or
appear unnecessary; and instituting the current City practice in cases where the
City requires securities or bonds. In Chapters 2 and 7, Ms. Grueter noted that
amendments are recommended to address an inconsistency between the
minimum lot size and the maximum density in single-family zones.
Ms. Grueter reported an amendment to the R-10 zone (Chapter 2) proposed by
Nora Schultz, who owns a property on Wells Ave. N. Ms. Schultz desires to
build a duplex that meets the minimum lot size; however, the density is greater
that ten units per acre. City Code does not allow attached units on pre-existing
smaller lots if the maximum density is exceeded.
Ms. Grueter reviewed four options that address this matter as follows: 1) No
action; 2) Allow multiplexes on individual pre-existing lots that meet the
minimum lot size but not the maximum density in the North Renton area only;
3) Allow multiplexes on individual pre-existing lots that meet the minimum lot
size but not the maximum density by requiring a conditional use permit; and 4)
Amend the Comprehensive Plan land use map and rezones to higher densities in
selected areas such as North Renton. Ms. Grueter stated that the Planning
Commission and staff recommends taking no action on this request, and
addressing the matter through the Cedar River Master Plan for 2005/2006 for
the North Renton area.
Moving on to the amendment concerning habitat set -aside in the Green River
Valley (Chapters 2 and 4), Ms. Grueter noted that the City's land acquisitions
have exceeded the original multijurisdictional target, and staff recommends
determining and documenting that the two percent habitat set -aside provisions
have been fulfilled and can be deleted from City Code. She reported another
amendment, proposed by Courtney Flora, regarding binding site plan (BSP)
provisions (Chapter 7) that are applicable to commercial, mixed use, and
industrial zones. Ms. Flora requests allowing subdivision of the Washington
Technical Center and similarly situated properties by treating the site as a
whole when considering compliance with zoning and development standards.
Ms. Grueter noted concerns with this proposal, including future property owner
disputes, creation of nonconformities, smaller lots and fragmentation, and
economic shifts. She reviewed the BSP options as follows: 1) No action; 2)
Revise BSP provisions so that, when reviewed as a whole, the site meets all of
the zoning and subdivision requirements; 3) Revise BSP provisions to include
allowances for condominiums as an option when the minimum lot size
requirements cannot be met through the BSP process; and 4) Revise the
planned unit development (PUD) regulations to allow for commercial/industrial
PUDs.
Continuing, Ms. Grueter reported that the next amendment concerns Growth
Management Hearings Board appeals (Chapter 8). Staff recommends correctly
identifying the appeals process for City Council actions on Comprehensive Plan
and Development Regulation amendments. Another amendment concerns the
February 28, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 61
permit and SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) process for nonproject
actions (Chapters 8 and 9). Ms. Grueter said this proposal addresses the timing
of the environmental review and the separation of the SEPA appeal and the
legislative hearing.
Ms. Grueter stated that the final amendment concerns PUD regulations
(Chapter 9). She explained that PUD regulations allow modification of
standard development regulations in exchange for open space or innovative
designs not otherwise allowed by the basic regulations applicable to a site. The
proposal modernizes the regulations, and provides a process to request
modifications to development standards in exchange for public benefits. The
amendments address applicable zones, the types of regulations that may be
varied with the PUD regulations, and other procedural items. In conclusion,
Ms. Grueter indicated that all docket items will remain in the Planning and
Development Committee for study.
In regards to the PUD regulations, Councilman Corman inquired if the
possibility of allowing apartment houses, via clustering, in the R-1 zone has
been eliminated. Ms. Grueter confirmed that variations are not allowed to the
permitted uses or the densities.
Public comment was invited.
Nora Schultz, 540 Williams Ave. N., #12, Renton, 98055, spoke on the subject
of her docket item concerning the R-10 zone amendment. She pointed out that
the nature of the North Renton area is changing, the R-10 zone only applies to a
portion of the North Renton area, and the area is already highly dense, due in
part to a number of existing non -conforming use structures. Ms. Schultz
indicated that a duplex will not adversely affect the area, and expressed her
support for the second or third option presented by City staff that allow
multiplexes in only North Renton or by conditional use permit.
Courtney Flora, 2025 1st Ave., #1130, Seattle, 98121, spoke on behalf of
Transpacific Investments, the proponent of the BSP amendment that applies
zoning and development standards to the entire BSP site rather than each
individual lot. Noting that the amendment has been adopted by other
jurisdictions, she explained that the proposal allows sites to be broken up and
marketed to individual users. She pointed out that this will help Renton, as the
City is experiencing a high vacancy rate, and will level the playing field with
other jurisdictions. Ms. Flora noted the importance of attracting businesses that
can actually use what is available. In regard to the PUD amendments, she
stated that it is unclear whether an existing office park will be able to comply
with those regulations.
Stan Kleweno, 101 SW Main St., #350, Portland, OR, 97204, stated that
Transpacific Investments is pursuing the BSP process amendment as a way to
compete in a challenging market. He indicated that it is difficult for individual
tenants and businesses to build and develop a property on their own, and this
would be an opportunity to attract tenants, owners, and users to the area. Mr.
Kleweno acknowledged that the leasing market can change; however, the
ability of a business proprietor to own property is invaluable in the current
market condition or any other.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY CLAWSON,
SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
February 28, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 62
ADMINISTRATIVE Derek Todd, Assistant to the CAO, reviewed a written administrative report
REPORT summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work programs
adopted as part of its business plan for 2005 and beyond. Items noted included:
Carco Theatre will receive a $5,000 grant from 4Culture (formerly King
County Arts Commission), which will be allocated toward this year's
Summer Teen Musical Grease.
As part of Boeing's Move to the Lake effort, the sky bridge across Park
Ave. N. was demolished on February 26th.
Finance: Interim Administrator Mayor Keolker-Wheeler introduced Mike Wilson, the interim Finance and
Introduction (Mike Wilson) Information Services Administrator, who indicated that during his 26-year
tenure in city management, he has worked for a number of cities and counties
including the cities of Bremerton, Sumner, and Gig Harbor. Mr. Wilson stated
that he is looking forward to working at the City of Renton over the next
several months.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Andrew Duffus, 9605 143rd Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, stated that Urban
Citizen Comment: Duffus - Separator regulations have been the subject of an extensive public process. The
R-1 Community Separators Planning Commission, City staff, and the Planning and Development
Committee received public input on various aspects of the matter, and a
solution has now been found. He indicated that support for the Urban
Separator regulations is widespread, including those who want to develop their
property and those who want to maintain the Urban Separator greenbelt. Mr.
Duffus urged Council to approve the proposed regulations.
Citizen Comment: Rollins - Jean Rollins, 9605 143rd Ave. SE, Renton, 98059, explained that the need for
R-1 Community Separators the City Code amendment for Urban Separators arose because of the proposed
Merritt H Annexation in May Valley. The King County Executive requested
the Boundary Review Board invoke its jurisdiction on the annexation proposal
due to a number of issues, including protection of the designated May Valley
Urban Separator. Commending City staff and the Planning Commission for
their hard work on the amendment, Ms. Rollins emphasized that the proposed
regulations respect the development rights of property owners as well as the
intent and environment of Urban Separators. She concluded by asking that the
dilution of development incentives for the enhancement of the greenbelt to earn
more lots be prohibited, and that the proposed regulations be approved.
Citizen Comment: Rogers -
Debra Rogers, 5326 NE 22nd Ct., Renton, 98058, expressed her support for the
R-1 Community Separators
previous speakers' comments and her appreciation for the City's effort on the
matter of the Urban Separators. She urged Council to approve the regulations.
Citizen Comment: Noland -
Dennis Noland, 14326 SE 100th Pl., Renton, 98059, reported that he lives
R-1 Community Separators
adjacent to the May Valley Urban Separator, and commended the Planning
Commission for developing guidelines for the Urban Separators. He said the
guidelines are respectful of the development rights of the property owners, are
respectful of the intent of the Urban Separators, and address environmental
concerns. Mr. Noland concluded by voicing his support for the proposed
regulations.
MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL SUSPEND
THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT ON THE R-1 ZONE COMMUNITY SEPARATORS.
CARRIED.
February 28, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 63
Planning & Development
Planning and Development Committee Chair Clawson presented a report
Committee
regarding the R-1 zone community separators. The Committee recommended
Planning: R-1 Zone
concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the City Code Title IV
Community Separators
(Development Regulations) amendment creating Urban Separator Overlay
Regulations and amending the R-1 zone to require mandatory clustering of
development outside of the contiguous open space mapped within the Urban
Separator. The Committee also recommended that the minimum lot size for
clustered development in the R-1 zone be changed to 10,000 square feet.
The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter
be presented for first reading. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY
LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of
Approval of Council meeting minutes of February 14, 2005. Council concur.
February 14, 2005
Vacation: 140th Ave SE,
City Clerk reported receipt of $16,500 compensation paid by petitioner, as set
Conner Homes, VAC-04-001
by Council on 10/25/2004, and recommended adoption of an ordinance to
finalize the Conner Homes vacation of a portion of 140th Ave. SE, located
between SE 132nd St. and SE 136th St.; VAC-04-001. Council concur. (See
page 65 for ordinance.)
CAG: 05-008, Lake
City Clerk reported bid opening on 2/22/2005 for CAG-05-008, Lake
Washington Blvd Slip Plane,
Washington Blvd. Slip Plane; seven bids; engineer's estimate $436,860; and
Northwest Cascade
submitted staff recommendation to award the contract to the low bidder,
Northwest Cascade, Inc., in the amount of $440,000. Council concur.
Court Case: Boeing
Court Case filed on behalf of Boeing Employees Flying Association, Inc., by
Employees Flying Association,
Philip T. Mattern, Demco Law Firm, P.S., 5224 Wilson Ave. S., Suite 200,
CRT-05-001
Seattle, 98118, regarding the removal of underground fuel tanks from leased
property at the Renton Airport. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services.
Community Services: 200 Mill
Community Services Department recommended approval of the emergency
Bldg, Emergency Repair of
repair of two elevators located at the 200 Mill Building in the amount of
Elevators
$38,156.16. Council concur.
Annexation: Wedgewood
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Lane, 144th Ave SE & 148th
submitted 60% notice of intent to annex petition for the proposed Wedgewood
Ave SE
Lane Annexation, and recommended a public hearing be set on 3/14/2005 to
consider the petition and future zoning; 35.68 acres located between 144th Ave.
SE and 148th Ave. SE. Council concur.
EDNSP: Renton Lodging Tax Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Advisory Committee recommended the appointment of Kim Hart, general manager of the
Appointment TownePlaceSuites and SpringHill Suites by Marriott, to the Renton Lodging
Tax Advisory Committee to fill the vacancy left by Terry Godat. Council
concur.
Development Services: Legal Division recommended adoption of an ordinance that amends City Code
Abandoned & Junk Vehicles, Chapter 6-1, Abandoned Vehicles, by adding definitions, expanding the scope
City Code Amend of junk vehicles to include parts thereof, adding explanatory language, and
criminalizing violations. Refer to Public Safety Committee.
Municipal Court: Probation Municipal Court requested authorization to hire a Probation Officer at Step D
Officer Hire at Step D of the salary range. Refer to Finance Committee.
February 28, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 64
Public Works: Cedar River
Utility Systems Division requested approval of a consultant agreement with
Section 205 Flood Damage
Golder Associates, Inc. in the amount of $99,396.12 to implement the 2005
Reduction 2005 Monitoring
Monitoring Plan for the Cedar River Section 205 Flood Damage Control
Plan, Golder Associates
Project. Council concur.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL APPROVE
THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Utilities Committee Chair Corman presented a report recommending
Utilities Committee
concurrence in the staff recommendation to collaborate with the Washington
Utility: Springbrook Creek
State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to create the Springbrook Creek
Wetland & Habitat Mitigation
Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank on approximately 130 acres of City -
Bank Concurrence, WSDOT
owned property located west of SR-167 and south of I-405. The Committee
further recommended the Mauer sign the letter of concurrence with WSDOT.
MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL CONCUR
IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Finance Committee Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending
Human Resources: 2005/2006 concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the fee schedule agreement
Claims Processing Fee with Healthcare Management Administrators for the 2005 and 2006 employee
Schedule, Healthcare medical plan administration. The Committee further recommended that the
Management Administrators Mayor and Cites be authorized to execute the fee schedule agreement.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN
THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Finance: Information Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending
Management Services, GM2 concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the annual consultant
Systems agreement for information management services with GM2 Systems, George
McBride, President. The Committee further recommended that the Mayor and
City Clerk be authorized to execute the agreement. MOVED BY PERSSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Finance: Vouchers Finance Committee Chair Persson presented a report recommending approval
of Claim Vouchers 234898 - 235346 and two wire transfers totaling
$1,132,929.17; and approval of Payroll Vouchers 55893 - 56118, one wire
transfer, and 570 direct deposits totaling $1,850,535. MOVED BY PERSSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE
REPORT. CARRIED.
Transportation (Aviation) Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Committee recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Addendum
Lease: Kaynan Addendum #10 to the Airport lease with Kaynan, Inc. (LAG-84-003) for an increase of
#10, Airport, LAG-84-003 6,260 square feet in the leased area to include pavement adjacent to the taxilane
at the Airport resulting in added revenue of $2,050 per year. The Committee
further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the
lease addendum. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Lease: Bosair Addendum #3, Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Airport, LAG-86-003 recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Addendum
#3 to the Airport lease with Bosair, LLC (LAG-86-003) to increase the leased
area by 21,510 square feet to allow aircraft access to Bosair's hangar, and
provide for an increase in the ground rental rate from $.27 to $.31 per square
foot using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Seattle, resulting in a total
annual rent increase of $4,724. The Committee further recommended that the
February 28, 2005
Renton City Council Minutes Page 65
Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the lease addendum. MOVED BY
PALMER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
Lease: Bruce J Leven
Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Addendum #7, Airport, LAG-
recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve Addendum
88-001
#7 to the Airport lease with Bruce J. Leven (LAG-88-001), which decreases the
leased area to eliminate 2,578 square feet because of the 1999 Cedar River
Floodwall and Levy Project, and 934 square feet because of the 2002 Airport
Airside/Landside Separation Improvement Project. This results in an annual
reduction in revenue of $715.81 and a one-time credit of $2,173.17. The
Committee further recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized
to sign the lease agreement. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY
NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Transportation: 1-405 Mainline
Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Alignment Concurrence,
recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor
WSDOT
to provide a concurrence signature to the Washington State Department of
Transportation regarding the I405 mainline alignment from the western City
limit to SR-169.
The concurrence concept for the I-405 project was established in the I-405
Corridor Program Final EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) as a method of
formal written determination on key issues by agencies so the I-405 program
may proceed to the next phase. The Council, on several 1405 key issues, has
provided concurrence since 1999. Concurrence regarding the I-405 mainline
alignment allows the Renton Nickel Project to progress without unintentionally
constraining future I-405 projects. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY
CORMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT.
CARRIED.
Transportation: I-405/SR-167 Transportation (Aviation) Committee Chair Palmer presented a report
Interchange 5% Design recommending concurrence in the staff recommendation to authorize the Mayor
Concurrence, WSDOT to provide a concurrence signature to the Washington State Department of
Transportation regarding the I-405/SR-167 interchange 5% design. The
concurrence concept for the I-405 project was established in the I-405 Corridor
Program Final EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) as a method of formal
written determination on key issues by agencies so the 1405 program may
proceed to the next phase. The Council, on several I-405 key issues, has
provided concurrence since 1999.
Concurrence regarding the I405/SR-167 interchange 5% design allows the
Renton Nickel Project to progress without unintentionally constraining future I-
405 projects. MOVED BY PALMER, SECONDED BY CORMAN,
COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED.
RESOLUTIONS AND The following ordinance was presented for first reading and referred to the
ORDINANCES Council meeting of 3/7/2005 for second and final reading:
Vacation: 140th Ave SE, An ordinance was read vacating a portion of unimproved road located on 140th
Conner Homes, VAC-04-001 Ave. SE between SE 132nd St. and SE 136th St. (Conner Homes; VAC-04-
001). MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL
REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON
3/7/2005. CARRIED.
February 28, 2005 Renton City Council Minutes Page 66
The following ordinance was presented for first reading and advanced for
second and final reading:
Planning: Medical Institution
An ordinance was read amending Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV
Definition, City Code Amend
(Development Regulations) of City Code by revising the definitions of
"Medical Institutions" and "Convalescent Centers," and adding a definition for
"Holistic Health Centers." MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY
NELSON, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND
FINAL READING. CARRIED.
Ordinance #5125
Following second and final reading of the above ordinance, it was MOVED BY
Planning: Medical Institution
CLAWSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE
Definition, City Code Amend
AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading and
adoption:
Ordinance #5126
An ordinance was read adding Section 5-1-2.K to Chapter 1, Fee Schedule, of
Finance: Special Water Meter
Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of City Code to adopt service fees
Read Service Fees
for special meter readings, new utility account set up, and utility account
transfers. MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL
ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES.
CARRIED.
Ordinance #5127
An ordinance was read amending Section 5-1-2.K to Chapter 1, Fee Schedule,
Finance: Utility Outstanding
of Title V (Finance and Business Regulations) of City Code to adopt service
Balance Search Fees
fees for utility outstanding balance searches. MOVED BY PERSSON,
SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS
READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
Councilwoman Nelson reviewed Renton School District happenings, which
School District: Activities
included: the naming of Nicole Parris, Lindbergh High School senior, as a
finalist in the National Achievement Scholarship Program; the selection of Lori
Dunn, Hazen High School physical education and health teacher, as the
Northwest District High School Teacher of the Year by the Association of the
American Alliance of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance; and
the celebration of Black History Month at Hazen High School.
ADJOURNMENT
MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL ADJOURN.
CARRIED. Time: 9:07 p.m.
,Box,,u c.' , / Wat4y-'
Bonnie I. Walton, CMC, City Clerk
Recorder: Michele Neumann
February 28, 2005
RENTON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETING CALENDAR
Office of the City Clerk
COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS SCHEDULED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 28, 2005
COMMITTEEXHAIRMAN DATE/TIME AGENDA
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MON., 3/07 Emerging Issues;
(Briere) 6:00 p.m. Filling Council Vacancies Policy #800-10;
Southport Development Concerns
*Council Conference Room*
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Nelson)
FINANCE MON., 3/07 Probation Officer Hire at Step D
(Persson) 5:00 p.m.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
(Clawson)
PUBLIC SAFETY MON., 3/07 Amendment to City Code regarding
(Law) 5:30 p.m. Abandoned & Junk Vehicles
TRANSPORTATION (AVIATION)
(Palmer)
UTILITIES
(Corman)
NOTE: Committee of the Whole meetings are held in the Council Chambers. All other committee meetings are held in the Council Conference Room
unless otherwise noted.
CITY OF RENTON
Mayor
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
W he.Yea4,, the American Red Cross has been serving the people of Washington State for more than
100 years; and
Wherea4; the American Red Cross is a national non-profit leader in the delivery of disaster relief,
both domestically and internationally; and
W herea4, the American Red Cross serving King and Kitsap Counties reaches out to those whose
lives have been touched by adversity and helps thousands of others prevent and prepare for crises yet to
come; and
Wherea�, the American Red Cross serving King and Kitsap Counties provided disaster relief to
more than 1,000 Washingtonian families last year; and
W heYeaw; the American Red Cross serving King and Kitsap Counties trained over 66,000
Washingtonians in health and safety courses and more than 3,000 in disaster preparedness; and
Whev'eCW, the American Red Cross serving King and Kitsap Counties provided emergency
communication for over 1,100 members of the U.S. Armed Forces and their families; and
W herea%, the American Red Cross serving King and Kitsap Counties provides nearly all its services
in Washington State through the contributions of more than 3,000 volunteers;
NOW, The4,ec re, I, Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor of the City of Renton, do hereby proclaim
March 2005, to be
2e& Cro�-k M oiqth/
in the City of Renton, and I urge all citizens to join me in this special observance.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Renton to be affixed
this 28`h day of February, 2005.
-K4-t&' 0"'_
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
Mayor of the City of Renton, Washington
RENTON
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425) 430-6500 / FAX (425) 430-6523
® This papercontains 50 % recycled material, 30 % post consumer
City of Renton
PUBLIC INFORMATION HANDOUT
February 28, 2005
STREET VACATION PETITION
VAC-04-007
For additional information, please contact: Karen McFarland;
City of Renton Technical Services 425.430.7209
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will hear a proposal requesting the vacation of three portions of
Bremerton Ave NE south of NE 4th Street and north of SE 2nd Place. The requested
vacation area is shown on the accompanying map exhibit.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council conditionally
approve the request to vacate portions of the right-of-way.
SUMMARY:
A vacation petition was received from David Halinen, Attorney, representing Donald J.
Merlino on behalf of Liberty Ridge, LLC. City Code requires that more than two-thirds
(2/3) of the owners whose property abuts the street to be vacated must sign the
petition. One -hundred percent (100%) of the abutting property owners have signed this
petition.
There are no public facilities within the requested area.
None of the City Departments surveyed have objections to the vacation. However, the
Transportation Systems Division and Development Services Division have no objection
as long as certain conditions are met.
The requested vacation area will be used in the proposed Elmhurst Plat which is
currently in preliminary development. The petitioner states that public benefit provided
by the proposed vacation would be to create a uniform half -street right-of-way width
along the west half of Bremerton Ave NE.
As established by RCW 35.79.030, the street vacation petition, if granted, must be
approved by the City Council through ordinance after a public hearing is held. The City
shall receive compensation in accordance with RCW 35.79.030 for the vacated alley.
The ordinance shall be recorded with King County once it is in effect.
P �aa�i
<�
``
-,,x
I �
I
O
f5:
•
•
Bremerton Avenue NE STREET
STREET E LN NW 4 TREET VACATION
VACATION SEC 15 VACATION
Public Hearing
on
STREET VACATION PETITION
VAC,-,04,-,007
February 28, 2005
RENTON
LOCATION
LOCATION
NE41th Street
Cn
Bre"merton Ave NE
Street., Vacations
LOCATION
LOCATION
LOCATION
LOCATION
BACKGROUND
• Petition received December 2004
• Pursuant to State and City Code, more than
2/3 of the abutting owners must sign the
petition
• 100% of abutting owners have signed
BACKGROUND
• Right-of-way obtained Through
various instruments.
• Currently:
There are NO City facilities in the
right -of --way
PUBLIC BENEFIT
• Request associated with the proposed
Elmhurst Plat currently in preliminary
development.
According to the petitioner, the public
benefit would be to provide a uniform
half -street right-of-way .
NOTIFICATION
• Notice was given to property owners
within the immediate vicinity of the
proposed street vacation.
• To date, staff has received one phone
call regarding this petition.
RESEARCH/SURVEY
• Vacation request was circulated to
various City departments and outside
agencies for review
• No objections were raised
RESEARCH/SURVEY
Infernal Review Comments
• Transportation Systems Division (PBPW):
— Area of vacation be amended so that the
two northerly portions allow a 25- foot
right-of-way width be maintained from the
road centerline
RESEARCH/SURVEY
Internal Review Comments
• Development Services Division (PBPW):
— Area of vacation be amended so that the
two northerly portions allow a 25-foot
right-of-way width be maintained from the
road centerline
RESEARCH/SURVEY
Outside Agency Review Comments
QWEST has no facilities in the
requested vacation area and has
indicated that no easement is needed
• To date, PSE, Comcast and Electric
Lightwave have not responded to the
City7s request for comments
The Planning/Building/Public Works
Department recommends that Council approve
the request to vacate three portions of right-of-
way along Bremerton Ave NE subject to the
following conditions:
✓Area of vacation for the two northerly
portions of the original request be set to a
maximum vacation width of 12.5 feet;
✓The petitioner shall provide satisfactory proof
that outside utilities have received and are
satisfied with any easements, which are
necessary to protect their facilities in the
requested vacation area.
NEXT STEPS
If Council approves this vacation petition:
• petitioner orders and submits an
appraisal
• staff reviews the appraisal and returns
to Council so that compensation can
be set
v ,y
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
City of Renton Municipal Code, Title IV Procedural and Development
Regulation Revisions 2004
February 28, 2005
The City reviews Municipal Code Title IV text amendments as a group once per year, although
some items may be the subject of separate work programs. The purpose of the Title IV Docket is
to consider annual zoning code text amendments proposed by both applicants and the City of
Renton. Table 1 provides a summary of the proposed code amendments considered as part of the
Docket or as individual related work programs. A summary of the requests, options reviewed,
and staff and Planning Commission recommendations is available. Contact Strategic Planning at
425-430-6575 for a copy.
Table 1. Title IV Amendment Requests
Title 4, Chapter 1, Housekeeping Amendments: 04-1
Docket Item: Yes
Proponent: City of Renton
Summary: Amend to be more concise, better organized, and internally consistent.
Title 4, Chapter 1: School Impact Fees: 04-2
Docket Item: Yes
Proponent: City of Renton
Summary: Amend to be more concise, and remove provisions that are more suitable for the Interlocal
Agreement or appear unnecessary.
Title 4, Chapter 1: 4-1-230 Sureties and Bonds
Docket Item: No
Proponent: City of Renton
Summary: Amend RMC 4-1 Administration and Enforcement to codify common City of Renton
conditions and practice in cases where the City requires securities or bond.
Title 4, Chapters 2 and 7: Minimum Lot Size and Maximum Density: 04-5
Docket Item: Yes
Proponent: City of Renton
Summary: Consider possible amendments to Title 4 in order to address an inconsistency between
minimum lot size and maximum density in single-family zones.
Title 4, Chapter 2: R-10 Zone, Attached Townhouses or Flats on Pre -Existing Lots: 04-13
Docket Item: Yes
Proponent: Nora Schultz
Table 1. Title IV Amendment Requests
Summary: The proponent owns a property on Wells Avenue North currently zoned R-10. The
proponent's desire is to build a duplex on the property that meets the minimum lot size, which would
result in a density greater than 10 units per acre. Section 4-2-1 1OF specifies that the density
requirements take precedence over the minimum lot size standards. The code does not allow infill of
multifamily structures on existing lots that meet the minimum lot size but do not comply with density
limits. Options reviewed address possible policy and code amendments that allow multiplexes (2, 3, or
4 units) on lots that meet the minimum lot size but not the zone density. Some options would apply
design standards. Some options would limit the effect of the regulations to North Renton, or limit the
multiplexes by requiring a conditional use permit. Another option conceptually reviews the potential
for Comprehensive Plan land use map and rezones; however this would require review in 2005 as part
of the annual Comprehensive Plan amendment process.
Title 4, Chapters 2 and 4: Green River Valley Landscaping: 04-6
Docket Item: Yes
Proponent: City of Renton
Summary: Determine/document if 2% habitat set -aside provisions have been fulfilled and can be
deleted from the code.
Title 4, Chapter 7: Subdivisions Regulations: Binding Site Plan: 04-8
Docket Item: Yes
Proponent: Courtney Flora
Summary: The proponent has opted to seek a text amendment to RMC 4-7-230, the City's binding site
plan regulations, to allow further subdivision of the Washington Technical Center and similarly
situated properties by treating the site as a whole when considering compliance with zoning and
development standards. The binding site plan process is applicable to commercial, mixed use, and
industrial zones. Other code amendment options address provisions to combine condominium
ownership with binding site plans, as well as amending the current PUD regulations (see below).
Title 4 Chapter 8: Appeal Process — Growth Management Hearings Board: 04-11
Docket Item: Yes
Proponent: City of Renton
Summary: Correct the appeals process for Growth Management Act actions.
Title 4, Chapters 8 and 9: Permit and SEPA Process For Nonproject Actions
Docket Item: No
Proponent: City of Renton
Summary: Identify and address options for the timing of environmental review for nonproject actions
and consider amendments for consistency with SEPA rules regarding the separation of hearings for
nonproject actions.
Title 4, Chapter 9: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Regulation Update
Docket Item: No
Proponent: City of Renton
Summary: The proposal would modernize the City's current PUD regulations and provide a process to
request modifications to development standards in exchange for public benefits. The amendments
address applicable zones, the types of regulations that may be varied with the PUD regulations, and
other procedural items.
i
City Council Hearing
February 28, 2005
Purpose
■ Adopt a series of regulation amendments to Title
IV as part of the annual docket process (RMC 4-
9-025)
w Most procedural or housekeeping
m Substantive issues related to R-10 zone, binding
site plan provisions, and PUD regulations
Proposed Amendments
A. 4-1: Housekeeping Changes
B. 4-I: School Impact Fees
C. 4-1: Sureties And Bonds
D. 4. 2 and 4-7: Minimum Lot Size and Maximum Density
E. 4- 2: R-10 Zone, Multiplexes on Pre -Existing Lots
F. 4- 2 and 4-0: Green River Valley Landscaping
G. 4-7: Subdivisions Regulations: Binding Site Plan
H. 4-8: Appeal Process — Growth Management Hearings Board
I. 4- 8 and 4-9: Permit and SEPA Process For Nonproject Actions
J. 4- 9: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Regulation Update (related to
BSP).
RMC 4-1 Housekeeping
Changes
a Amendments to clean up long-standing
inconsistency, interpretation, and organization
issues identified by various staff PBPW.
List of Comp. Plan Elements matches GMA
Duties of interpretation (e.g. Zoning Administrator)
Definitions of violation and statement of remedies/penalties
Reorganization of PW fees (no change to fees themselves)
Clarify that fee waiver for Co, RM-U and RM-T replenished
from tax revenues (not just mitigation fees replenished).
School Impact Fees
a Purpose: Reduce and streamline Title 4 & set up a
framework within which future amendments
could be made to convert SEPA mitigation fees to
impact fees if City pursues this approach.
Consolidate 14 subsections into five subsections and
Remove provisions that are more suitable for the Interlocal
Agreement or appear unnecessary.
a Review of ISD Capital Plan and any fee
adjustments -- separate process.
Sureties
= Overview: What are sureties?
Devices that set aside funds as a guarantee to ensure that
Infrastructure, landscaping, and environments! mitigation are
Installed and maintained to City satisfaction, or for temporary
uses to ensure they are removed when the time limit is reached.
a Features - Proposal would institute current City practice:
Type of security devices: cash, letter of credit, set aside letter,
savings account, and performance or maintenance bond.
Requirements (City Is payee, binding heirs, etc.)
City approval tied to term of security device - If the device is not
renewed and the Improvements or conditions are not fulfilled, the
City's approval would lapse.
Ability to transfer obligation of the security device.
Provisions addressing default, failure to complete work.
Release of securities for private/onsite knprovements and for
public Improvements.
2
Min. Lot Size and Max. Density
w Amend the RMC 4-7 (Subdivision Regs) to require:
Further subdivision of lot(s) must be consistent with the
applicable maximum density requirement as measured within the
plat as a whole.
■ Amend the RMC 4-2 single family zones with a note:
Covenants shall be filed as part of any Flnol plat that establishes
that future division of land within the plat must be consistent with
the maximum density requirements as measured within the plat
as a whole.
■ Does not affect R-10 and R-14 because those zones
explicitly state that density controls over lot size and
covenants are required to establish the density and unit
mix for those zones.
R-10 Zone Amendment
m A Renton property owner, Nora Schultz, owns a property
on Wells Ave N zoned R-10.
■ Desire is to build a duplex on the property.
■ R-10 zone allows multiplexes (up to 4 attached) on
smaller lots in new subdivisions if overall plat density is
met.
to Zone does not permit attached units on preexisting
smaller lots if max. density would be exceeded.
■ Question — should the R-10 zone be amended to allow
multiplexes on preexisting lots that meet the min. lot size
but exceed the max. density?
zNOMA: .
Q
Q
-10 in N. Renton
0
J
5.000 - 7.499 Sq. Ft.
�a31® 7,500-10,000 Sq. Ft
®�® � - 10.000 Sq. Ft.
3
R-10 Options
1. No Action -- Density Controls over Lot Size.
A "Cedar River Master Plan" to be developed in 2005/2006. Could
look at zoning options In the North Renton area.
2. Allow multiplexes on indiv. pre-existing lots that meet
the min. lot size but not the max. density — but only in N.
Renton
Policy LU-165 would need to be amended.
Could require some standard design features.
The mix of SF and MF could change to become more uniformly
multiplex In N. Renton on lots smaller than 8,700 s.f.
3. Allow multiplexes on indiv. pre-existing lots that meet
the min. lot size but not the max. density — but by
ADCUP. Same issues as #2, more oversight.
R-10 Options (cont.)
4. Amend Land Use Plan/Rezone to higher densities
if City vision has changed in selected areas such
as North Renton arterial frontage lots.
e.g. RM-T zone: "The RIM-T Zone occurs in areas where
compact, traditional residential neighborhood
development already exists, or ... where traditional
residential neighborhoods are planned in the future.
Density ranges from fourteen (14) to thirty five (35)
du/acre."
Policy decision requiring Comp. Plan amendment
R-10 Recommendation
■ Recommendation: Option 1 No Action —
Do not amend the R-10 zone.
Address the Issue of appropriate zoning and unit types through
the "Cedar River Master Plan' work program for 2005I2006
addressing the North Renton area.
a Allowing duplexes on existing smaller lots meeting the
lot size of 5,000 s.f.
Could lead to densities that are significantly higher than the R-10
zone maximum- up to 17 dulac
Would not meet the current R-10 zone Intent.
Allowing lot size to control may mean more multiplexes In
established R-10 neigh'ds without a way to control dwelling mix
as happens in newly created larger plats.
0
Green River
Valley: City
Ownership
& Wetlands
Green River Valley
Green River Valley Habitat Set
aside -- Recommendation
■ The City should repeal the 2% habitat set aside
• regulations in RMC 4-2 and 4-4.
City's land acquisitions have exceeded the original
multijurisdictional target (purchased 340 ac. with approx.
208 ac. of wetlands greater than 110 acre target)
The City's critical area, shoreline, and clearing regulations
are essentially substitute regulations that achieve the
intent for habitat protection that the 21/6 set aside was
enacted to provide.
Binding Site Plan - Request
■ Revise BSP provisions so that, when reviewed as
a whole, the site meets all of the zoning and
subdivision requirements.
5
Binding Site Plans - Key Issues
w Pitfalls of treating the site as a whole:
Future property owner disputes — need for complex cross
easements, joint use and maintenance agreements, etc.
::. Creation of nonconformlties—that require ongoing administrative
Interpretations and review.
Smaller lots and fragmentation — reduces the redevelopment
potentlal of the ekes — "freeze' development In place.
.. Reducing the individual lot sizes below the minimum zone
standards could circumvent the zones' purposes.
. Industrial, Office, and Urban Center zones — larger scale,
. Corridor Commercial zone intended for smaller comm.& bus.
development.
a Allowing parcel fragmentation could result in defacto "rezones".
Binding Site Plans - Key Issues
(cont.)
The incremental and potentially uncertain benefit of attracting a
different pod of "business buyers" as opposed to "business
tenants' appears short-term in nature.
Economic shifts may result in a greater demand for vacant space
without the need for the code amendment. _
The City should consider Its overall long-term vision: -
. The City is trying to reinvent itself and shouldn't limit long term
economic development goals;
. The City is an Urban Center which will have spin-off and
supporting economic development;
a Having zones with larger properties are important for the City's
vision/strategies,
Sample Bindirlg.she Plan Lot Configurallon
Gel
Binding Site Plans - Options
n. No Action- Keep the current requirements that the
development standards for the underlying lot apply to
each individual lot created. (Staff recommendation)
Revise BSP provisions so that, when reviewed as a
whole, the site meets all of the zoning and subdivision
requirements.
Revise BSP provisions to include allowances for
condominiums as an option when the minimum lot size
requirements cannot be met through the binding site plan
process.
u Revise the PUD Regulations (RMC 4-9-150) to allow for
commercial/industrial PUD's.
GMHB Appeals
a Purpose: Correctly identify the appeals process for City
Council actions on Comprehensive Plan Amendments and
Development Regulation Amendments. I
Tables in RMC 48 show that appeals of City GMA related decisions
would go to Superior Court, when they would need to be be filed
with the Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB).
The GMHB decisions then may be appealed to Superior Court -
fill Ordinance specifies:
Who may file an appeal
Matters which may be appealed
Who has standing
Time for an appeal
Contents of Petition
Changes to Permit Process —
Nonproject
a Public Process — No Code Changes
The Notice of Application process should be retained.
Public hearing notices would continue.
Consider other public participation techniques when preparing
the public participation plan for the annual CPAs or Title IV
docket amendments. GMA requires plan; City practice more
formalized.
Administrative Appeal - Keep current process that allows.
a Environmental Review — Code Amendments.
For nonproject actions, start env. review before hearing on
proposal, but Issue SEPA determination (e.g. OS, DNS, MONS)
after hearing on proposal - lets SEPA be conducted on more
firmly described proposal.
Housekeeping: Related to hearings on nonproject actions - SEPA
appeal and legislative hearing do not need to be combined.
7
PUD Amendments - Overview
■ Outgrowth of BSP docket options, but long outdated.
■ PUD regulations allow modification of standard
development regulations in exchange for open space or
innovative designs not otherwise allowed by the basic
regulations applicable to a site.
■ E.g. cluster developments, low impact developments, zero
lot line developments, or other approaches may be
allowed with the process.
PUD Amendments - Issues and
Approach
■ Which zones are eligible?
Currently the City's PUD regulations only apply to
residential zones.
Recommended code allows Planned Unit Development
regulations to be applied in residential zones and
commercial, mixed use and industrial zones.
. Options include allowing PUDs with any City zone, or any City
zone except R-1 and R4 zones, which have their own cluster
regulations, or the COR zone since it is like a "master plan" zone
now with few numeric standards.
PUD Amendments - Issues and
Approach (Cont.)
is What regulations should be allowed to be varied?
_- Allow variations to:
a Zoning, subdivision, and parking standards (continue)
a Property Development Standards in RMC 4-4
a Street standards in RMC 4-6. Streets could be public or private.
a Allow modification of other standards with City Council approval
O/sa//ow variations to:
a Allowed land uses or maximum densities
. Utility standards in RMC 4-6 (e.g. water, wastewater, storm water),
. Building/fire codes in RMC 4-5
a Procedures
a CAR, S&P, Tree Cutting/Land Clearing, and Grading
. Can combine modifications/variances to these with PUD (keep
same review criteria).
M.
PUD Amendments - Issues and
Approach (cont.)
■ Open Space: Currently, 35% of the site inc. critical areas.
Since critical areas may vary from site to site, an alternative
would be to place emphasis on common usable open space.
Residential: Open space must be equal to or greater In size than
the total square footage of the lot area reductions requested by
the PUD.
Mixed Use, Commercial, Industrial: Similar to Urban Center req'ts
with some recent amendments by EDINISP.
■ Process:
City Council review of Preliminary PUD and HEX review of Final
PUD.
Consider HEX review and approval for existing nonresidential
developments proposing to use the binding site plan process.
The decision would be appealable to the City Council.
W
CITY OF RENTON
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 28, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
FROM: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
SUBJECT: Administrative Report
In addition to our day-to-day activities, the following items are worthy of note for this week:
ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• The City Clerk's office, in compliance with State law and with the help of the Records Coordinators in each
Division, recently completed the disposal of approximately 5.6 tons of City records that had reached the end of
their useful and required retention periods per the State General Records Retention Schedules. Thus, 11,190
pounds of paper will be made into new products via a recycling process.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
• Carco Theatre will receive a $5,000 grant from 4Culture (formerly King County Arts Commission). The grant
will be allocated toward this year's Summer Teen Musical Grease. This is the 20th anniversary of the teen
musical.
Renton Community Center hosted its annual Safety Day on Thursday, February 240'. Over 300 parents and
children attended this successful event, which is co -sponsored by Valley Medical Center, Valley Com, and the
Renton Police and Fire Departments.
Even though the Renton School District took a mid -winter break last week, the Highlands and North Highlands
Neighborhood Centers were open, offering drop -in activities to Renton youth. Three different mini -camps
were also offered - two cheerleader camps and one sports camp.
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
• As part of Boeing's Move to the Lake effort, the sky bridge across Park Avenue North was demolished last
Saturday, February�`h. Park Ave North at the Boeing Plant was closed at 7:00 a.m. and reopened by 6:00
p.m. The sky bridge was taken down in two sections and the work completed as scheduled.
--
r-os
-----••--------------- ------- ----- --OS13l/2u04 MO •o) ----- ---- -O
tri _t Four
King County
Ron Sims P. E C E I V E D
King County executive
AUG 3 0 20114
D13TFI T FOU51
K)WG C,UVTY COU;�CII.
August 2?, 2004
Lenora Blauman, Exocutive Secretary
Washngtotl State Boundary Review Board of Kin, C01.1nty
YeSler Building, Room- 220
400 Yesle- ��7ay
Seattle, WA, 98104
Dear Ms. 81aunlaa:
011 J111y I' , 2004 the Office of I 'lanagement and Budcet receiv; d fro-ill.your office the city of Renton's notice of intention to ann-,N prcperty located lVltlllll tliC c:ty,s East
Renton Plateau potential annexation area. Based on a careful and deliberative reviaw b,,
various county departments and agencies, the county believes that there are a number o:l inherent concerns and issue_ wi=_h the proposal that if left unaddressed 'would likely rest., t
in an annexation which does not further the interests of King Clown% residents, floes not:
111eet tile spirit of state and County b owtn i>,anagemen.t pt)licy, and does not further the
Objectives of the Boundary Review; Board.
The 20.6 acre lierritt li annexation proposal is located in an area of urban uniLlcorf,or:1tc,i King County that lies between the cities of Renton and Newcastle. Thr proposed
Anne:�ati.otl Daises a nunllle-c1f;i,nificant co7lcet-7s «,hic11;11clude, but care no{ limited to
1. The county's continued ability to provide effIcient local set ti'iC sin all urban
uturleurporated area kalught \vith iu2•e;,zul&r rnunicip,
isolated between the cities of Renton au,d INewcasel boiu-ldari4s and relatively.,
2• EIlvir011Y11e11t3.1 and Surface water I?lail"ierletlt issues EiSov; i te,;j Wllh rile
Valley corridor;
3. The application of appropriate zoning to protect the re&rionally designated 11Iay
Valley urban separator;
4. Consistency -with adopted plans and policies including the 1 ir?g' County
Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and tale King County Count wide Planning
Policies; and
S. Consistellcy with Boundary Rcviev,- Roarer objectives.
an;! cnr-plic' wit?; :he '.![ntericanS with Disnbilirier act AD—Iu
-------------------------•------------------------------
--------------------------
_
18"30i:004 MC1.v 16:01 FAX 20629603;0 KO", D1);tI'1ct Four zol)2
Len ra Blaumall
AuE .1st 27, 2004'
Piles 2
For here reasons, I respectful)y request that the Boundary Relviexv Braid invoke its
juri: fiction and �rol7r.ssd action. I fuI?lier request that a public hearing date
LPL lr:.. rhis matter at the boar,,FS ;;,"•lrlieSt', ccmveillenca. A. vabllc hearing will me me QllntV, i?tTl'CTCG C?TlLCrI� `MC Clt�' Qn oppolnin-1ty to revie'Fi al d discuss, Within t e
parz 1?ete-s of the Board's ci'.cision mn.°_kmg process. Elie proposal 1-1 grcaler detail.
Ple% St drect further communications 'Z ,3.rdino this hatter to 'like Thamas. Senior
Poli y Analyst, Office of?Mamgement ?lid E3l:dgot at 206-20i-0...,0. { _o "l'hanic you or
you assistance in this matter.
Sint ;r%c.?v,
,1
•kA/t
On Sims
Ill; County Extc cuiive
rc: The Horiorable Larry Pn ill ps, Chair, icing. Cotulty Coun'-1
K'lii Triplett, Chief of Staff. king Col nn, Execui.ive Gfrice
Steve Call, Director, Office of Manapment and Budget (Gi�1B i
Mike Thomas, Se .for Policy A—ria1Z'st, O."YgB
kCvIlY Wr'1ght, Sr. P1.Osecu'ri14 .",tcl;le)', Kills County Prose ..�Attot elt's :T a
C CJti.:`. IC.
King County ltlterd--partmeanta.i Annexation Group
A:ex Pietscll, Director, Ne 2hbolhoods. Strweglc Pianllin and i:conomic
Develops?lent. City of p elltoll
King County Allnexatioll Tejrr:
C:W COUNCIL
Date '�- a F- .200S
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
R-1 Zone Community Separators
Referred December 6, 2004
The Planning & Development Committee recommends concurrence in the staff
recommendation to approve a Renton Municipal Code, Title IV amendment creating Urban
Separator Overlay Regulations and amending the R-1 zone to require mandatory clustering of
development outside of the Contiguous Open Space mapped within the Urban Separator.
The Committee recommends that the minimum lot size for clustered development in the R-1
zone be changed to 10,000 square feet.
The Committee further recommends that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for
first reading.
Da Clawson, Chair
A.,- C'J,
Denis W. Law, Vice Chair
Marcie Palmer, Member
cc: 4af-Gev-iAg,=
Alex Pietsch
Rebecca Lind
RIZoneCommSepVersionldod Rev 01/04 bh
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact......
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI #: r
AJLS/City Clerk
Bonnie Walton, x6502
Subject:
Street Vacation Petition; Portions of 140th Ave. SE,
between SE 132"d and 136th Streets.
(Petitioner: Conner Homes; File No. VAC-04-001)
Exhibits:
Minutes of 6/14/2004 & 10/25/2004
Ordinance
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
For Agenda of: 2/28/2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence.
Ordinance .............
Resolution............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions.....
Information.........
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: N/A
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
/:/
X
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
On June 14, 2004, the City Council held a public hearing and approved the Conner Home
vacation request for a portion of 140th Ave. SE, running north and south between SE 132"d St. and
SE 136th St. On October 25, 2004, Council accepted the appraisal and set compensation at
$16,500 for the right-of-way, 20 feet in width and approximately 308 feet in length. On January
21, 2005, the City Clerk received the compensation amount of $16,500. The Technical Services
section has since confirmed that no other amounts are due, and all conditions of the vacation
approval have been satisfied. Therefore, the ordinance can be adopted to finalize the vacation.
Per staff request, ordinance language includes retention of a 10-foot utility easement for existing
stormwater facilities
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Finalize the street vacation by adopting the ordinance
cc: Karen McFarland
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
June 14, 2004
Council Chambers
Monday, 7:30 p.m.
MINUTES Renton City Hall
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler called the meeting of the Renton City Council
to order and led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag.
ROLL CALL OF
DON PERSSON, Council President; MARCIE PALMER; TERRI BRIERE;
COUNCILMEMBERS
DENIS LAW. MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON,
COUNCIL EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS DAN CLAWSON,
TONI NELSON AND RANDY CORMAN. CARRIED.
CITY STAFF IN
KATHY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Mayor; JAY COVINGTON, Chief
ATTENDANCE
Administrative Officer; ZANETTA FONTES, Assistant City Attorney;
BONNIE WALTON, City Clerk; GREGG ZIMMERMAN,
Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator; DAVE CHRISTENSEN,
Utility Engineering Supervisor; ALEX PIETSCH, Economic Development
Administrator; REBECCA LIND, Planner Manager; CHIEF LEE WHEELER,
DEPUTY CHIEF LARRY RUDE, and FIRE MARSHALBATTALION
CHIEF STAN ENGLER, Fire Department; DEREK TODD, Assistant to the
CAO; COMMANDER KENT CURRY, Police Department.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Vacation: 140th Ave SE,
Conner Homes, VAC-04-001
This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and published in
accordance with local and State laws, Mayor Keolker-Wheeler opened the
public hearing to consider the petition by Conner Homes to vacate a 20-foot by
308.85-foot unimproved portion of 140th Ave. SE running north and south
between SE 132nd and SE 136th Streets (VAC-04-001).
Dave Christensen, Utility Engineering Supervisor, explained that the petitioner
plans to remove unusable right-of-way and provide new right-of-way as part of
its proposed Laurelhurst Plat, which is currently in development. The new
right-of-way will serve the proposed residential lots and provide the same
functionality as the requested vacation area.
Mr. Christensen stated that 100% of the abutting owners have signed the
petition for vacation. The right-of-way included in this petition came into the
City as part of the recent Carlo Annexation. It was obtained through a
quitclaim deed to King County in 1966, and the unimproved right-of-way was
never opened for public use, nor maintained by King County. He noted that the
right-of-way immediately south of the petition area was vacated by King
County in 1998.
Continuing, Mr. Christensen reported that facilities in the right-of-way include
a 36-inch storm drain that is owned by the City, and a buried water line that is
owned by Water District #90. He stated that no objections were raised when
the request for the proposed vacation was circulated to City departments and
outside agencies. The Surface Water Utility Division requested that an
easement be retained for storm facilities. In conclusion, Mr. Christensen
recommended approval of the street vacation request with the stipulation that
the City retain a ten -foot utility easement for the existing storm drain, which
skirts and crosses the eastern boundary of the area. Additionally, he
recommended that staff be directed to work with the petitioner to determine the
compensation through an appraisal of the vacation area.
June 14, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes
196
Public comment was invited.
David JorDan, 14004 SE 135th St., Renton, 98059, raised questions regarding
the easement, the abandonment of 140th Ave. SE, the proximity of the
proposed houses to the new property line, the maximum height of the proposed
structures, preservation of the neighborhood's character, adding the balance of
the easement to the abutting properties, and the environmental impacts of the
proposed development.
In answer to Mr. JorDan's questions, Mr. Christensen stated that of the 50-foot
right-of-way, 30 feet is adjacent to the homes east of the area and is within
King County, and 20 feet is within the City limits. He pointed out that King
County is responsible for determining whether the adjacent property owners
can add the 30-foot (King County -owned) right-of-way to their property.
Continuing, Mr. Christensen indicated that the Transportation Division
determined that 140th Ave. SE is not a corridor that will be developed in the
future. In regards to the proposed development, the height restriction is 35 feet
and the backyard setback is 20 feet. The street vacation process is exempt from
SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act); however, the proposed plat will
undergo environmental review. Mr. Christensen emphasized that the applicant
is only in the early stages of the development process for the proposed plat.
Planner Manager Rebecca Lind added that the R-8 zone allows eight dwelling
units per net acre, and she reiterated that the development is in the early stages
of review and there will be further opportunities for the public to comment.
Karen Cook, 14012 SE 133rd St., Renton, 98059, expressed concern regarding
the R-8 zoning abutting her property's R-4 zoning, and suggested that the
existing 20-foot right-of-way serve as a buffer. Indicating that the developer
may tie into the storm drainage system that was installed to relieve flooding,
Ms. Cook stated that the effect the increased stormwater will have on the
system has not yet been addressed. She questioned how the vacated area will
be used, why the vacation request was changed from 30 feet to 20 feet, and
where the roadway will be constructed.
Mr. Christensen clarified the applicant did request 30 feet; however, the right-
of-way width is actually 20 feet with a ten -foot easement. He explained that the
unusable right-of-way that cannot be developed as street section will be
replaced with new right-of-way to serve both this area and the proposed plat.
Mr. Christensen said the storm drainage issue will be addressed during the
development process. In regards to the roadway, he stated that it will be
constructed interior to the plat.
PlanningBuilding/Public Works Administrator Gregg Zimmerman stated that
the proposed plat is a separate process. The plat will undergo SEPA review,
and property owners within 300 feet of the proposed land use action will be
noticed, as well as any citizens that request to be parties of record.
Jay Cook, 14012 SE 133rd St., Renton, 98059, stated that in regards to the
subject property, it is unclear what King County is responsible for and what
Renton is responsible for. He expressed concern about the stormwater
drainage, and recommended that the vacation be denied because not enough is
known about the proposed development at this time.
Mr. Christensen explained that the storm line runs along the centerline of the
right-of-way, which is why the ten -foot easement has been requested. The
June 14, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 197
easement area, along with the 30 feet of remaining right-of-way, is more than
adequate for the maintenance of the storm line. He stressed that adjacent
property owners need to contact King County regarding the 30-foot portion of
right-of-way that is under King County's jurisdiction.
Lola Archer, 14004 SE 133rd St., Renton, 98059, expressed concerns regarding
the roadway, the size of the easement, the storm drain, stormwater drainage,
and flooding. She indicated that because there are too many unknowns, she
wants to see the development proposal before the vacation request is approved.
In response to a previous speaker's (Mr. JorDan) additional inquiries regarding
the submittal of vacation petitions to King County, the value of the vacation,
and the location of a roadway, Mr. Christensen stated that preliminary
development plans indicate that new residences' backyards, not a roadway, will
abut the property line. He explained that King County abides by State law in
regards to vacation requests, as Renton does, and an appraisal must be
conducted on the subject property.
Lily Bishai Treadwell, 14005 SE 133rd St., Renton, 98509, expressed concern
about the stormwater drainage, pointing out that her property was damaged six
years ago due to rising groundwater and she was forced to move out of her
house for six weeks. She agreed with the idea of a buffer area between the new
development and the existing residences. Ms. Bishai stressed that the vacation
request should not be pursued until the drainage problem is addressed.
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler explained that the developer is pursuing the vacation
first, so that it can develop its plans accordingly. She indicated that the
speakers' concerns regarding stormwater drainage are on record, and drainage is
one of many aspects that will be reviewed when the plat is submitted. The
Mayor advised that the developer must meet City standards in regards to
stormwater drainage; however, the City has no control over what King County
does on its property. She emphasized that citizens will have the opportunity to
comment during the development process.
Rene Treadwell, 14005 SE 133rd St., Renton, 98059, indicated that the King
County installed storm line was only designed to serve the pond to the north,
and if the developer ties into it, the line will exceed its capacity to drain. He
stated that he does not want his property to flood again.
There being no further public comment, it was MOVED BY PERSSON,
SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CARRIED.
Councilwoman Briere expressed her support for the recommendation to vacate
the street, saying that there would be a much greater impact to the neighbors if
this property became a street, rather than the new residences' backyards.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR WITH
THE RECOMMENDATION TO VACATE A PORTION OF 140TH AVE. SE
RUNNING NORTH AND SOUTH BETWEEN SE 132ND ST. AND SE
136TH ST. ROLL CALL: THREE AYES: PALMER, BRIERE, LAW; ONE
NAY: PERSSON. MOTION CARRIED. (See page 199 for related
discussion.)
June 14, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 199
Renton swimming beaches open on June 19th. Lifeguards will be on duty
daily from noon to 8:00 p.m., through September 6th, at Gene Coulon
Memorial Beach Park and Kennydale Beach Park.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of
Approval of Council meeting minutes of June 7, 2004. Council concur.
June 7, 2004
Appointment: Nishiwaki Sister
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler appointed the following individuals to the Nishiwaki
City Committee
Sister City Committee: Pat Auten, 14401 SE Petrovitsky, #B-105, Renton,
98058, to fill position vacated by Sylva Coppock; Theresa Clymer, 1704 Lake
Ave. S., Renton, 98055; and Nancy Osborn, 4635 Morris Ave. S., #F, Renton,
98055. Refer to Community Services Committee.
Appointment: Park Board
Mayor Keolker-Wheeler reappointed Marjorie Richter, 300 Meadow Ave. N.,
Renton, 98055, to the Park Board for a four-year term expiring 6/01/2008.
Council concur.
EDNSP: Hotel/Motel
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
Allocation to Renton Visitors
recommended approval of the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
Connection, Renton Visitors
recommendation to allocate an additional $3,500 of hotel/motel tax revenues to
Guide
the Renton Visitors Connection to print 10,000 additional copies of the Renton
Visitors Guide. Council concur.
Streets: Rename SW 41st St to
Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department
IKEA Way
requested authorization to proceed with the proposal to rename SW 41st St.,
from SR-167 to Oakesdale Ave. SW, to IKEA Way. Refer to Transportation
(Aviation) Committee.
Legal: Curbside Mailboxes,
Legal Division recommended adoption of an ordinance restricting parking next
Parking Restriction
to curbside mailboxes. Council concur. (See page 203 for ordinance.)
Public Works: SR-169
Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommended approval of
Corridor Study, Maple Valley
memoranda of understanding with the cities of Maple Valley and Black
& Black Diamond Memo of
Diamond concerning application for Puget Sound Regional Council funds for
Understanding
the SR-169 (Maple Valley Hwy.) Corridor Study. On their behalf, Renton will
submit the TEA-21 countywide grant application. Council concur. (Seepage
203 for resolutions.)
CAG: 03-083, NE loth
Utility Systems Division submitted CAG-03-083, NE loth St. and Anacortes
St/Anacortes Ave NE Storm
Ave. NE Detention Pond and Storm System Improvement; and requested
System Improvement, Santana
approval of the project; authorization for final pay estimate in the amount of
Trucking & Excavating
$11,424, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of retained amount
of $39,762.25 to Santana Trucking & Excavating, Inc., contractor, if all
required releases are obtained. Council concur.
MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL APPROVE THE
CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Discussion ensued regarding the consequences of the motion made pertaining
Vacation: 140th Ave SE,
to the Conner Homes street vacation request. (The motion made to approve the
Conner Homes, VAC-04-001
request was originally thought to have failed; see page 197.)
June 14, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 200
RECESS
Vacation: 140th Ave SE,
Conner Homes, VAC-04-001
(continued)
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THE
CONNER HOMES VACATION TO THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE TO REVIEW ADDITIONAL ISSUES
THAT WERE RAISED. CARRIED.*
Recommending that further research concerning the motion be conducted, it
was MOVED BY PERSSON, SECONDED BY BRIERE, COUNCIL RECESS
FOR TEN MINUTES. CARRIED. Time: 8:53 p.m.
The meeting was reconvened at 9:03 p.m.; roll was called; all Councilmembers
present except Clawson, Nelson and Corman, previously excused.
Assistant City Attorney Zanetta Fontes explained that when a legislative action
is on the table, a majority of the voting body (four of the seven -member
Council) must vote in the affirmative for the legislation to be adopted. In this
case, the motion was an action based on the staff recommendation of whether
or not to move forward with the vacation and eventually bring forward an
ordinance. The motion was not a legislative act; therefore, the motion to
approve the vacation carries, as a majority of the quorum voted in favor of the
motion (three of the four Councilmembers present).
*MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL RESCIND THE
MOTION TO REFER THE CONNER HOMES VACATION TO THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL REFER THE
PROCESS FOR HOW THE CITY HANDLES STREET VACATIONS TO
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Planning & Development Planning and Development Committee Chair Briere presented a report
Committee
regarding park and ride regulations. The Committee met on June 9th to
Planning: Primary Use Surface
consider proposed regulations for park and ride facilities within the Urban
Parking Lots Development,
Center, Rainier Corridor, Employment Area Valley, and surrounding
Park & Ride Facilities
commercial and residential areas. The Committee concurred in the
recommendation of staff for approval of legislation establishing "Shared Use
Park and Ride" and "Dedicated Park and Ride" as separate uses subject to
conditions requiring structured parking within the Urban Center and Rainier
Corridor, allowing surface parking facilities south and east of I405, and
allowing shared -use park and rides in churches and similar non-residential uses
within residential areas.
The Committee further recommended that, due to the expiration of the current
moratorium on surface parking lot development on 6/15/2004, the proposed
legislation be forwarded to the City Council for first and second reading.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY LAW, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE
COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See later this page for ordinance.)
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL SUSPEND
THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO THE ORDINANCE ON TIES TOPIC.
CARRIED.
Planning: Primary Use Surface
An ordinance was read amending Chapter 2, Zoning Districts - Uses and
Parking Lots Development,
Standards, and Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV (Development Regulations)
Park & Ride Facilities
of City Code to add regulations for park and ride facilities. MOVED BY
BRIERE, SECONDED BY PALMER, COUNCIL ADVANCE THE
ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING. CARRIED.
-^� October 25, 2004 Renton City Council Minutes Page 371
ADMINISTRATIVE Chief Administrative Officer Jay Covington reviewed a written administrative
REPORT report summarizing the City's recent progress towards goals and work
programs adopted as part of its business plan for 2004 and beyond. Items noted
included:
• The Renton Senior Activity Center's Annual Craft Bazaar, featuring
handmade crafts by Renton area senior citizens, is on October 30th, from
9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
• The Washington State Department of Transportation cameras along the I-
405 corridor have now been linked to the City so that the images of traffic
on I-405 can be viewed in the Traffic Control Center at City Hall.
AUDIENCE COMMENT Marty McCombs, Highlands Community Association (HCA) Vice President,
Citizen Comment: McCombs - 3412 NE Sunset, Blvd., Renton, 98056, asked for assistance on behalf of HCA
Pedestrian Safety Issues, in resolving two pedestrian safety issues at the 800 block of Harrington Ave.
Harrington Ave NE
NE. The first is the broken and buckled sidewalk, and the second is a storm
drain that is located approximately six inches below grade. Mr. McCombs
requested that HCA be informed as to when these problems will be repaired.
MOVED BY BRIERE, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER
THESE ISSUES TO THE ADMINISTRATION. CARRIED.
Citizen Comment: Mroczek -
Larry Mroczek, 14130 SE 154th PI., Renton, 98058, stated that he owns
Property Rezone from R-8 to
property at 700 SW 4th Pl., and thanked the City for including his property in
CN, SW 4th PI
the SW Sunset Blvd. rezone from R-8 to Commercial Neighborhood.
CONSENT AGENDA
Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the
listing.
Council Meeting Minutes of
Approval of Council meeting minutes of October 18, 2004. Council concur.
October 18, 2004
Budget: 2005, Annual City of
Finance and Information Services Department recommended setting public
Renton
hearings on 11/8/2004 and 11/22/2004 to consider the City of Renton 2005
Budget. Council concur.
Vacation: 140th Ave SE,
Technical Services Division reported receipt of appraisal performed for Conner
Conner Homes, VAC-04-001
Homes Street Vacation (VAC-04-001) for portion of 140th Ave. SE, and
requested Council accept the appraisal and set compensation at $16,500 for the
right-of-way. Council concur.
Airport: Pro -Flight Aviation
Transportation Systems Division recommended approval of Addendum #1 to
Lease, Addendum #1, LAG-
LAG-99-002, Airport lease with Pro -Flight Aviation, Inc., for a rent increase
99-002
from $9,342.41 to $11,700.08 annually, and to change the purpose of use to
allow a fuel storage facility and fuel sales. Refer to Transportation (Aviation)
Committee.
CAG: 04-076, 2004 Street
Transportation Systems Division submitted CAG-04-076, 2004 Street Overlay;
Overlay, ICON Materials
and requested approval of the project, authorization for final pay estimate in the
amount of $138,108, commencement of 60-day lien period, and release of
retained amount of $33,271.61 to ICON Materials, contractor, if all required
releases are obtained. Council concur.
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
VACATING A PORTION OF UNIMPROVED ROAD LOCATED ON
140TH AVENUE S.E. BETWEEN S.E. 132ND STREET AND S.E. 136TH
STREET. (CONNER HOMES, VAC-04-001)
WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of unimproved road located
on 140`h Avenue S.E. between S.E. 132"d Street and S.E. 1361h Street was filed with the
City Clerk on or about April 15, 2004, and that petition was signed by the owners
representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to
be vacated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3691, passed on May 17, 2004, set
June 14, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and
place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this
hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or
in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and
arguments presented to it; and
WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has
considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the
public benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this
vacation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION I. The following described portion of unimproved road located on
140`h Avenue S.E. between S.E. 132"d Street and S.E. 136`h Street, to wit:
[The right-of-way 20 feet in width and approximately 308 feet in length, of
1401h Avenue S.E., south of S.E. 132nd Street]
See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully
set forth herein
is hereby vacated subject to a stormwater utility easement over, across, under and on all the
following described area in favor of the City:
The East 10.00 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the
City of Renton, King County, Washington.
This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing,
enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to,
water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto. The
City may also construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is subject to
the following terms and conditions:
That a utility easement will be retained by the City over the above -described area, with
the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated,
with the City's approval, at the sole cost of the developer; and
That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the
parties, and their heirs and successors in interest and assigns.
SECTION II. The City Council hereby elects to charge a compensation amount
of $16,500 (Sixteen Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars) to the petitioner -owners.
2
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections,
and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1173:2/23/05:ma
3
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
2005.
EXHIBIT A
CORE DESIGN, INC.
BELLEVUE WA 98007
Core Project No: 02052
03/08/04
Legal Description — Street Vacation (Portion of 140th Ave. S.E.)
The east 30.00 feet of the north half of the northeast quarter of the southeast
quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 15; Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington;
Except the north 20.00 feet thereof.
02052LI Ldoc, 3/8/04, page I
NE CORNER NORTH HALF
NE1/4, SE1/4, NW1/4
SEC. 15-23-05
0
N
30.01
PORTION OF 140TH AVE SE
TO BE VACATED
30
N
W
pip N
t6 -
SCALE 1" = 50' Mo
S LINE NORTH HALF 30�
NE1/4, SE1/4, NW114
SEC. 15-23-05
3/
PORTION OF VACATED
t 40TH AVE. NE. I
PER KING CO. ORDINANCE
NO. 13228 I
REC. NO. 20020208002079
S.E. 132ND ST.
I
I 1
I
W�
wz
>w
o \0 0
I 15
I
16
IPUGET COLONY\
HOMES
F
17 /
I
I
CARLO PROPERTY PAGE
LARUELHURST/RENTON
2 OF 2
ROAD VACATION EXHIBIT
' 14711 NE 291h Place Suite 101
Ml--, Woshigton 98007
Coo
425.865.7877 fx 425.865.7963
ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVEYING
JOB NO_ 02052
4�
4
3
5
2
w
sew�,.
8
9
t0
11
R E N T 0 N
kole
NE 4TH St
SE 1281H ST.
BIA PT.,
BN PT.
1852
2103
N
CREENW000
C AIETERY
17 169
16
15
14
`
Cmw
MAPLEWOW
CO1.F COURSE
VICINITTYp,MAP
CARLO PROPERTY PAGE
LAROELHURST/RENTON
/ROADDVVACATION EXHIBIT 10F 2
con14711 ME 29th Ploce Svite 101
25.885- 877 Fo -4 P8007
425.8857877 Fox 425.8857963
DESIGN
ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING
JOB NO_ 02052
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
SUBMITTING DATA:
Dept/DivBoard... City Clerk
Staff Contact...... Bonnie Walton
SUBJECT:
Bid opening on February 22, 2005, for CAG-05-008,
Lake Washington Blvd. Slip Plane Project
EXHIBITS:
Staff Recommendation
Bid Tabulation Sheet (seven bids)
Al11 #: 3 . `
FOR AGENDA OF: February 28, 2005
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent......... X
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance.......
Resolution......
Old Business....
New Business....
Study Session...
Other...........
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Legal Dept......
Council concur Finance Dept....
Other.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required... $440,000 Transfer/Amendment..
Amount Budgeted........ Revenue Generated...
Total Project Budget ... $640,000 City Share Total Project...
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Engineer's Estimate: $436,860
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
In accordance with Council procedure, bids submitted at the subject bid opening met the following three
criteria: There was more than one bid, the low bid was within the project budget, and there were no
irregularities. Therefore, staff recommends acceptance of the low bid submitted by Northwest Cascade,
Inc. in the amount of $440,000.
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 23, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the City Council
VIA: Bonnie Walton, City Clerk
FROM: Transportation Design
STAFF CONTACT: Jaso rritzler, x7243
SUBJECT: Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Project
The work on the Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Project shall include installation
of a soldier pile wall on the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard near NE 50 St in
Renton. This work includes but is not limited to grading, installation of piles, installation
of tiebacks (anchors), testing of tieback capacities, and minor roadway rehabilitation.
The Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Project is ranked number 53 in the 2005-
2010 TIP and currently has $640,000 budgeted. The lowest bid submitted by Northwest
Cascade fell within the project's total budget at $440,000 and over the engineer's
estimate of $436,860, with a difference of $3,140.
The Transportation Design Section would like to recommend that the contract be
awarded to Northwest Cascade. Additionally, we also recommend that the Agenda Bill
outlining this project go Council Concur since the low bid is within budget, there were
seven bids submitted, and there were no irregularities in the low bid.
Attachments: TIP #53
Bid Tab
cc: Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director
Leslie Lahndt, Transportation Design Supervisor
Jason Fritzler, Transportation Design Project Manager
File
H:\Division.s\TRANSPOR.TAT\DESIGN.ENG\IASON\Projects\Lake Washington Boulevard Slide\City Correspondence\Contraa Award Memo.doc
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIVISION
9nnF _ 9nin CIY_VCAD TID
Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Functional Classification: Principal Arterial Fund: 317
Proj. Length: N/A Proj: 12302
RANK: 53 CONTACT: Jason Fritzler 426.430.7243
DESCRIPTION:
Retain the failing slope on the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard and reconstruct both north and
southbound lanes within the slide area. This project will be coordinated with the Coal Creek Utility District
for the repair of their sewer line within the slide area. The project limits are along Lake Washington
Boulevard from NE 51st St south 0.1 mile.
JUSTIFICATION:
Since the Nisquaily Earthquake in 2001, the slope along the west side of Lake Washington Boulevard
(LWB) has been moving. Consequently, this has produced a large semi -circular crack in the southbound
lane of LWB. Additionally, Coal Creek Utility staff has noticed that their sewer line has moved with the
slide. Attempts have been made to seal the cracks in the roadway and have been unsuccessful due to
the rapid movement of the slide.
Project Totals Programmed Pre-2005
STATUS:
Construction to be completed and sewer line repaired by Coal Creek Utility District in 2004.
As-builts, final payments, and project closeout in 2005.
CHANGES:
Funded : 1640.000 1 On -funded
Six Year Program
ITEM
Programmed
Spent In 2003
2004
Total
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Project Development
27 370
27,370
Precon En Admin
64,030
2 030
62 000
R-O-W includes Admin
Construction Contract Fee
496,60
489.00
7,600
7.600
Construction En /Admin
52,000
49,000
3,000
3,000
Other
TOTAL EXPENSES
640,000
29,400
600,000
10 600
10,600
SOURCESD :1/2
Cent Gas Tax
Business License Fee
640,000
29,400
600,000
10,600
10,600
Grants In -Hand
Mitigation In -Hand
L.I. D.'s Formed
Other In -Hand
Grants Proposed
Mitigation Proposed
L.I.D.'s Proosed
Other Proposed
Undetermined
LM Oft
urmr a "AM
5 - 53 FINAL
Project Title: Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane
City of Renton
BID DATE:
February 22, 2005
Engineers Estimate
Caicos Corp
Condon -Johnson
DBM Contractors
Malcolm Drilling
Northwest Cascade
Item
Unit
Est.
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
Unit
Bid
No.
Description
Quantity
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
Pr%rz _,.;
Amount;;
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
Price
Amount
1
Contractor Supplied Surveying (R1-05.4(3))
LS
1
7,500.00
7,500.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
"2.QQ 00
' 2000:00.
4,000.00:
4,000.00
4,50_0.00
4,500.00
10,0_00.00
10,0_00.00
2
Traffic Control and Signage(R1-10)
LS
1
32100.00
32 100.00
28,000.00
28,000.00
10,Q00 00
000.00
8,500.00
8,500.00
12 600.00
12,600.00
6,300.00
6,300.00
3
Temp. Water Pollution/Erosion Control (Rt-07.15, WSDOT 8-01)
- LS
1
1100010
550.00
1,550.00
1,000.00
00
00
.7 00 b0
19;000.00
19,000:'00
---
1,950.00
--
1,950.00
1,320.00
1,320.00
4
Utility Potholing(R1-07.7)
FA
-
1
-
- 650.00
650.00
-
650.00
650.006b00
5560U°
650.00.
650.00
650.00
650.00
650.00
650.00
5
Resolution of Utility Conflicts (1-07.17)
FA
1
950.00
950.00
950.00
- --
950.00
r950.00
950<00 =
950,00,
950.00
950.00
950.00
950.00
950.00
6
-
Mobilization (1-09.7)
LS
1
12 500.00
-
12 500.00
45,000.00
-
- 45,000.00
65000 00
65 000 00
40;000 S0
-40 000:00
50,000.00
50 000.00
11,000.00
11,000.00
7
Clearing and Grubbing (2-01)
LS
1
2 600.00
2 600.00
12,OOb.00
12,000.00
16 000 00
10 000 d0
3,500:00
-
3 500.00
3,750.00
3 750.00
5,500.00
5,500.00
8
Removing and Resetting Beam Guardrail (8-11)
LF
200
30,00
00.60
- 40 00
8,000.00
=25 90
,' 5,180 DO
12:00
2,400:00
22.50
- - --
4,500.00
-
40.00
-
8,000.00
9
Remove Asphalt Concrete Pavement (2-02)
SY
300
25.00
7,500.00
11.00
31300.00
11.00,:'
3 300 00"
1500,
4,500:00
14.40
4,320.00
12.00
3,600.00
Remove Plastic Traffic Markings (8-22.3(6))
LS
1
1,000.00
1,000.00
650.00
650.00
150.00
150 a0
>1 00
100 :
--
600.00
- ----
600.00
- --
165.00
---
165.00
11
Replace Ashalt Concrete Pavement (5-04.2 and 5-04.3)
TON
80
150.00
12 000.00
108.00
8,640.00
89 00
7 120 00
t10 00
8 8Q0 OQ' .;
150.00
12,000.00
145.00
11,660.00
12
Install New Traffic RPM Markings [Type t] (8 09, 8 22 and 9-21)
LS
1
2,000.00
2,000.00
950.00
950.00
920 00
''• 92EY,bQ
1 t50 00 .
.1 150.00
- -
900.00
--
900.00
-00
1,012.00
1,012.00
13
--
Soldier Piles Drilling (WSDOT Soldier Pile Wall Special Provision)
- LF
1,200
-
85.00
102,000.00
--
85.00
- -
102,000.00' -
150.00-180,000.00
".95.00 .
1.14,000.00 .
135.00
-
162,000:60
-
95.00
-
114,000.00
14
_Soldier Piles Material (WSDOT Soldier Pile Wall Special Provision
LF
1,200
95.00
114 000.00
61.00
-
73,200.00 ;
• `a "]00 b0
':120 OOQ.00
,130.00 �15s,00b:b0
105.00
- -
t26,000.00
--- -10
84.00
100,800.b0
15
Prefabricated Drainage Material
SY
150
26.00
3 900.00
10 00
1,500.00
600.00,
25.00
`r3 750 00
5.00
750.00
6.00
900.00
16
Timber Lagging Installation (Soldier Pile SP 2.02, 9-09.2)
MBM
9
2,500.00
22,500.00
1,300.00
11,700.00 '-3;000 00
'-27,000.00
,
3;250.00 f '-29,250:00
4,500.00
40,500.00
1,930.60
17,370.00
17
Removing Obstructions (Soldier Pile SP 3.03G, 1-09.6)
FA
1
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5000.00, .
5,000.00 `
5,000.00
5.000.00
5 000.00
t000.00
5,000.00
18
Tieback (Permanent Ground Anchor (PGA) SP 2.Oi and 3, 6 02.2)
EA
28
2,900.00
81,200.00
4,500.00
126,000.00
5,500.00 ;'.'
154 000 00
.3,250.00
91,000.00
5,500.00
154,000.00_
3,000.0_0
84,000.00
19
Tieback Performance Test (PGA SP 3.04D)
EA
3
390.00
1 170.00
--
1,600.00
-
4,800.00
-
400 00
> 1200 „ 2 000 00
6,000.00
2,500.00
7,500.00
1 050.00
3,150.00
26
Tieback Verification Test Program (PGA SP 3.04C)
LS
1
-
7,000.00
-
7,006.60
3,000 00
3,000.00 10 000 00
---
10 000 O(3
21,000 00
21 Ob0',00
- -
3,500.00
3,500.00
5,200.60
_
5,200.00
21
Excavation for Lagging Installation
CY
1,000
2.20
2,200.00
95.00
95,000.00
45.00 -. 95,000 00 =
17.00 "
1,7,000:00
12.00
12,000.00
-----
7.50
-
22
Removal of Soil Spoil from Site
CY
1,000
7.00
7,000.00
45.00
45,000.00
30 00
30 000 0
17.00
17,000.00
12.00
12,000.00
17.00
_7,500.00
17,000.00
23
Hydroseeding and Planting (9 14.2)
LS
1
300.00
300.00
750.00
750.00
1;1.95 00 ry "1 1951,000.00
900.00
-- -- -
900.00
- -
1,320.00
1,320.00
24
Erosion Contol (Jute) Matting (9-14.5)
LS
-
1
-
390.00
- -
390.00
-
2,300.00
-
2,300.00
1 AOO.OQ
1 400 00"'
1,000:00
- 1,000.00
1,800.00
1,800.00
3,000.00
3,000.00
25
Topsoil Type A (9 14)
LS
1
2,300.00
2,300.00
3,000 00
3,000.00
2.000 00
2 000 00
1;000.00
-
1,000.00
3,750.00
3,750.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
26
Finish and Clean-up (1-04.11)
LS
1
1,550.00
1,550.00
1,500 00
1,500.00
1,000 00.I
nnn-nn
1,500.00
1,500.00
7,500.00
7,500.00
15,663.00
15,663.00
TOTAL:
436,860.00
586,890.00
660,665,00
557,951.00
633,920.00
440,000.00
LOW BIDDER
SCRPRICE LWB Slip Plane, Bldiab
Project Title: Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane
BID DATE: February 22, 2005
Item
No. Description
RW Scott TBH & Associates
Unit Est. Unite Bid- Unit Bid
Quantity Price Amount.:-,., Price Amour
1
Contractor Supplied Surveying (Rt-05.4(3))
LS
1
2
Traffic Control and Signage(Rt-10)
LS
1
3
Temp. Water Pollution/Erosion Control (Rt-07.15, WSDOT 8-01)
LS
1
4
Utility Potholing (Rt-07.7)
FA7___
1_
5
Resolution of Utility Conflicts (1-07.17)
_
FA
1
- 6
Mobilization (1-09.7)
LS
1 1.
7
Clearing and Grubbing (2-01)
LS
1
6
Removing and Resetting Beam Guardrail (8-11)
LF
2_00
9
Remove Asphalt Concrete Pavement (2-02)
SY
300_
10
Remove Plastic Traffic Markings (8-22.3(6))
LS
1
11
Replace Ashalt Concrete Pavement (5-04.2 and 5-04.3)
TON
80
12
Install New Traffic RPM Markings [Type 1) (8-09, 8-22 and 9-21)
LS
1
13
Soldier Piles Drilling (WSDOT Soldier Pile Wall Special Provision)
LF
1 200
14
- Soldier Piles Material (WSDOT Soldier Pile Wall Special Provision
LF
1,200 ;7,
_15
Prefabricated Drainage Material
SY
150
_
16
Timber Lagging Installation (Soldier Pile SP 2.02, 9-09.2)
MBM
9
17
Removing Obstructions (Soldier Pile SP 3.03G, 1-09.6)
FA
1
18
Tieback (Permanent Ground Anchor (PGA) SP 2.01 and 3, 6-02.2)
EA
28_
19
Tieback Performance Test (PGA SP 3.04D)
EA
3
20
Tieback Verification Test Program (PGA SP 3.04C)
LS
1
21
Excavation for Lagging Installation
CY
1,000 "
22
Removal of Soil Spoil from Site
CY
1,000
23
Hydroseeding and Planting (9-14.2)
LS
1
24
Erosion Contol (Jute) Matting (9-14.5)
LS
1
25
Topsoil Type A (9-14)
LS
1
26
Finish and Clean-up (1-04.11)
LS
1
TOTAL:
15 92. ;QO
49,670.29
49,670.29
7;466.02-
7,466.82
650 9t ;
.650.00
650.00
5 00
950.00
950.00
113 OQO
35,048:21
- ---
35,048.21
4 OOE O
2,883 39
- - - - - - - -- - -- -- - -- — --
2,883,39 — -
7` 600
-
80QQ 2446_
5
7,338.00
2 Q Off
1$2.31
-- -- - —
182.31. -- - - - -- -
10,8Q OQ
-199.159
15,887.20
1,00 0,0 ,
1;374:34
76 80. 00
193.27 ;
- - - -- - - -
231,924,00
.�SasQ�xq�
t�aas��1421a8;©o
900 Ot�
8.30
:' , 1;245:00'
8,55tOQt,
2,83747_'
- -- - —
.25,537.23
5 OQO 00�
5 000 00
5,000.00
140,QOtrf�Or 249668
69907.04
5�� 542 76 '1 628 28
40 0(k�
6 797 05r
:6 79705
16
-:16
090 00
'�80Q0d4 2V46
- - - — - - ----
21,460.00
729 24
729;24 - -
7Q OOr
1,729,72
1,729,72
2 60004
6 811.23
6,811.23 .
9,2,'19
37
9,372 19. - -
]4';2 O.1b , 674,995.60
' Submitted bid was
$674,995.86. The red
cells indicate a
multiplication error in the
unit price and the number
of units. Item #8 indicates
$8,386.26 in the amount
column on the Schedule of
Prices.
SCHPRICF "'P Plane, BidTab
CITY OF RENTON
BID TABULATION SHEET
ROJECT: Lake Washington Boulevard Slip Plane Project; CAG-05-008
DATE: February 22, 2005
FORMS
BID
BIDDER
Triple
Bid
Addendrun
Addend►un
Includes 8.8% Sales Tax
Form
Bond
1
2
Caicos Corp.
X
X
X
X
$586,890.00
PO Box 267
Port Gamble, WA 98364
Luke Ivey
Condon -Johnson & Associates, Inc.
X
X
X
X
$660,665.00
651 Strander Blvd., Ste. 110
Tukwila, WA 98188
Eric Dybevik
DBM Contractors, Inc.
X
X
X
X
$557,951.00
PO Box 6139
Federal Way, WA 98063
Paul Groneck
Malcolm Drilling Co., Inc.
X
X
X
X
$633,920.00
S701 S. 192nd St.
ent, WA 98031
Michael Pollock
Northwest Cascade, Inc.
X
X
X
X
$440,000.00
PO Box 73399
Puyallup, WA 98373
Harry Thetford, Jr.
R.W. Scott Construction Co.
X
X
X
X
$514,250.00
4005 West Valley Hwy., Ste. A
Auburn, WA 98001
Jeff Scott
TBH & Associates, LLC
X
cliecks
X
X
$674,995.86
6119A NE 88th St.
Vancouver, WA 98665
Peter A. Tapio
:'NGINEER'S ESTIMATE TOTAL: $436,860.00
LEGEND:
Form: Triple Form: Non -Collusion Affidavit, Anti -Trust Claims, Minimum Wage;
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
UBMI TTING DATA:
Dept/Div/Board.. AJLS/City Clerk
Staff Contact... Bonnie Walton
SUBJECT:
CRT-05-001; Court Case
Boeing Employees Flying Association, Inc. v. Action Aviation,
Inc.; William O. Wiles & Marilyn Hazel Wiles; Robert H. Snow
& Elaine Snow; and City of Renton
EXHIBITS:
Summons and Complaint
FOR AGENDA
AGENDA STATUS:
Consent....
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance.. .
Resolution...
Old Business.......
New Business......
Study Session....
Other....
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVALS:
Legal Dept......
Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Services Finance Dept....
Other.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment..
Amount Budgeted ........ Revenue Generated...
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Summons on Amended Complaint and First Amended Complaint for Damages, Remedial Action, Costs,
and Injunctive Relief filed in King County Superior Court by Philip T. Mattern, Demco Law Firm, P.S.,
5224 Wilson Ave. S., Suite 200, Seattle, 98118, on behalf of Boeing Employees Flying Association, Inc.,
regarding the removal of underground fuel tanks from leased property at the Renton Airport.
CITY OF RENTON
1 FEB 14 2005
BECE► ED
2 CITY CLERK'S CFFiC-C
3
4
5
6
7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
8 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
9 BOEING EMPLOYEES FLYING
10
ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington NO. 04-2-08871-2KNT
nonprofit corporation,
11 SUMMONS
Plaintiff, ON AMENDED COMPLAINT
12
V.
13 ACTION AVIATION, INC., a Washington
corporation; WILLIAM O. WILES and
14 MARILYN HAZEL WILES, husband and wife
and the marital community comprised thereof;
15 and ROBERT H. SNOW and ELAINE SNOW,
husband and wife and the marital community
16 comprised thereof; and the CITY OF
17 j'�
RENTON, a Washington municipality, R aAarmxt/,
18 Defendants. PIOPW 4AMu1t5+y-0_+0r
19 TO: The above -named defendant(s).
20
A lawsuit has been started against you in the above -entitled court by plaintiff, Boeing
21 Employees Flying Association, Inc. Plaintiffs claims are stated in the written amended
22 complaint, a copy of which is served upon you with this summons.
23 In order to defend against this lawsuit, you must respond to the amended complaint by
stating your defense in writing, and by serving a copy upon the persons signing this summons
241 within twenty (20) days after service of this summons, excluding the day of service, if you are
served within the State of Washington, or within sixty (60) days after service of this summons,
25 excluding the day of service, if you are served outside the State of Washington. If you do not
respond, a default judgment may be entered against you without notice. A default judgment is
26 one where plaintiffs are entitled to what they ask for because you have not responded. If you
Summons on Amended Complaint - 1
DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
5224 WItSON Av.. S., SUITE 200
SEAT I-F, WASHINGTON 98118
(206) 723-2330
FAX: (206) 723-2332
1
2
3
4
5
serve a notice of appearance on the undersigned persons, you are entitled to notice before a
default judgment may be entered.
Any response or notice of appearance which you serve on any party to this lawsuit must
also be filed by you with the court within 20 days after the service of summons, excluding the
day of service.
If you wish to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter, you should do so promptly so
that your written response, if any, may be served on time.
THIS SUMMONS is issued pursuant to Rule 4 of the Superior Court Civil Rules of the
7 State of Washington.
8 DATED this 1 Oth day of February, 2005.
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17'
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
ZABEFMAction Aviation\c021005 summ am cm
Summons on Amended Complaint - 2
DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
By
John W. co, WSBA # 00866
Philip T. Mattern, WSBA #16986
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
5224 WILSON AVE. S., SUITE 200
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118
(206) 723-2330
FAX: (206) 723-2332
3
5
6
E
I
11
12
13
14
15
16
17.
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
CITY OF PENTION
FEB 14 2005
%C EEIV1=D
CITY Gi.cciK;6 OFFICE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING
BOEING EMPLOYEES FLYING
ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington NO. 04-2-08871-2 KNT
nonprofit corporation,
Plaintiff,
V.
ACTION AVIATION, INC., a Washington
corporation; WILLIAM O. WILES and
MARILYN HAZEL WILES, husband and wife
and the marital community comprised thereof,
and the CITY OF RENTON, a Washington
municipality,
Defendants.
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
DAMAGES, REMEDIAL; ACTION
COSTS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
I. PARTIES
1.1. Plaintiff, Boeing Employees Flying Association, Inc. (`BEFA'), is a licensed
nonprofit Washington corporation with its headquarters in Renton, WA.
1.2. Defendant, Action Aviation, Inc. ("Action'), is a licensed Washington
corporation with its headquarters in Renton, WA.
1.3. Defendant, William O. Wiles, is the president and an officer and shareholder of
Defendant Action Aviation, Inc., and is an individual living in the state of Washington at all
times pertinent to this lawsuit.
1 st AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, REMEDIAL ACTION
COSTS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF - 1 —�
0�oV
DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
5224 WILSON AVE. S., SUITE 200
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118
(206) 723-2330
FAX: (206) 723-2332
4
5
6
7
8.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
11
19
21
22
23
24
25
1.4. Defendant, Marilyn Hazel Wiles, is the wife of Defendant William O. Wiles and
an officer and shareholder of Defendant Action Aviation, Inc., and is an individual living in the
state of Washington at all times pertinent to this lawsuit.
1.5. All acts done by Defendants Wiles were done for the benefit of their marital
community.
1.6 The City of Renton is a Washington municipality located in King County.
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2.1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and claims, and venue in this Court is
proper.
III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
3.1. On December 11, 1987, a contract was entered into between BEFA and Action
("1987 Agreement") wherein, inter alia, Action purchased underground fuel storage tanks,
appurtenant equipment, and apparatus (collectively referred to hereinafter as "the fuel farm")
from BEFA.
3.2. On October 15, 1996, a contract was entered into between BEFA and Action
("1996 Agreement") wherein, inter alia, BEFA and Action modified their landlord/tenant
relationship and Action reaffirmed its ownership of the fuel farm.
3.3. The fi1e1 far„ ;L- t„-.,+oa — .L_ ,--- A
Washington ("subject property").
3.4. At all times pertinent to this lawsuit, BEFA maintained a leasehold estate from the
City of Renton in the subject property.
3.5. The 1996 Agreement provides that a portion of BEFA's leasehold interest in the
subject property is assigned to Action. At all times pertinent to this lawsuit, the parties have
acted in accordance with the lease assignment and landlord/tenant relationship.
3.6. Action used the fuel farm as equipment in its business of providing fuel and oils
to the general public during its period of possession of the subject property.
1st AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, REMEDIAL ACTION
COSTS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF - 2
DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
524 WILSON AVE. S., SUITE 200
SEATPLE, WASHINGTON 98118
(206)723-2330
FAX: (206) 723-2332
L
3
4
5
6
7
8
J•7. On June 24, 1997, Action notified BEFA of its intention to terminate the 1996
Agreement. From that point on, BEFA and Action operated on a month -to -month tenancy.
3.8. BEFA notified Action on March 22, 2003 that it intended to terminate its assignment
of any leasehold interest in the subject property to Action and notified Action that it would have
to vacate the premises by April 30, 2003.
3.9. On March 28, 2003 the City of Renton notified Action that its authority to sell
fuel at the Renton Airport was terminated.
3.10. Action, through its attorney, on March 29, 2003 acknowledged a month -to -month
9 tenancy relationship with BEFA and requested that BEFA not require them to vacate the
1011 premises until June 30, 2003. In accordance with its request, Action vacated the property at or
11 around the end of June, 2003, but did not remove the fuel farm that still to this day remains in the
12 land of the subject property.
13 3.11. Action did not pay rent for the months of April, May, or June of 2003.
14 3.12. Action has caused there to be incidents of the releasing of fuels that have caused
15 contamination to the leased premises.
16 3.13. Action is obligated to remove all of its property from the subject property.
17 3.14. Action is in breach of the 1996 Agreement by abandoning its underground fuel
18 farm at the subject property, and is therefore unlawfully in possession of the land.
19 3.15. On December 1, 2003, the City of Renton demanded that Action secure the tanks
20 in the fuel farm by temporary closure.
21 3.16. BEFA has never operated the fuel farm. BEFA has never had control over the
22 operations of the fuel farm. BEFA has never received any benefit from the operation of the fuel
23 farm. At all times material to this action, the fuel farm has been operated and controlled by
24 Action and its officers.
25 3.17. The Washington State Department of Ecology has determined that Action is the
26 owner/operator of the subject fuel farm and has demanded that Action remove the same.
I st AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, REMEDIAL ACTION
COSTS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF - 3 DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
5224 WILSON AVE. S., SUITE 200
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118
(206) 723-2330
FAX: (206) 723-2332
2
3
4
5
3.18. Over a period of many years, the City of Renton was aware of and consented to
Action's operation of the fuel faun. The City of Renton provided Action the licenses necessary
to operate the fuel farm, and received tax revenue from the operation of the fuel farm. Whenever
any issue of possible fuel spillage was brought to the attention of the City of Renton, the City
until 2004 looked to Action for resolution. The City of Renton was aware of and acquiesced in
BEFA's assignment of lease to Action and in BEFA's sale of the fuel farm to Action.
7 3.19. Contrary to the previous pattern of looking to Action for remediation, in 2004 the
8 City of Renton made demands of BEFA that were related to Action's operations. In a letter dated
9 March 2004, the City of Renton directed BEFA to remove the tanks of the fuel farm. Ott May
10 13, 2004, the City of Renton sent notice to BEFA that it would issue a citation against BEFA and
11 threatened fines and imprisonment.
12 3.20. In a Memorandum Decision dated December 27, 2004 in response to plaintiffs
13 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Judge George T. Mattson stated that, based on the record
14 before him; it is possible that the fuel farm may belong to the City of Renton and that therefore
15 the City of Renton is a necessary party to this lawsuit to determine the obligations of the parties
16 with regard to removal of the tanks.
17 IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
18 Action Breach of Contract
19 4.1. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1.1 — 3.20 as if fully set forth herein.
20 4.2. Action is in breach of the 1996 Agreement by not removing the underground fuel
21 farm and therefore not fully vacating the subject property after the expiration of the term of its
22 leasehold, and BEFA has been harmed and is entitled to damages in an amount to be proved at
23 trial.
241 4.3. BEFA is entitled to all reasonable expenses, costs, and attorney's fees incurred in
25 pursuing this action.
26
1 st AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, REMEDIAL ACTION
COSTS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF - 4
DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
5224 WILSON AVE. S., SUITE 200
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118
(206) 723-2330
FAX: (206) 723-2332
1
2
3
Violation of Pollution /Toxic Substances Laws
5.1. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1.1 — 4.3 as if fully set forth herein.
5.2. Action is in violation of RCW 70.105D.010 et seq. by releasing hazardous
substances into the environment and is strictly, jointly and severally liable for the costs of
511 remedial action.
6 5.3. William O. Wiles is in violation of RCW70.105D.010 et seq. as an operator of the
7 fuel farm for releasing hazardous substances into the environment and is strictly, jointly and
8 severally liable for the costs of remedial action.
9 5.4. BEFA is entitled to all reasonable expenses, costs, and attorney's fees incurred in
10 pursuing this action pursuant to RCW 70.10513.080.
11 5.5. Upon information and belief, defendants Wiles and Action have violated other
12 statutes, ordinances, and common law controlling pollution, toxic substances, and nuisance.
13 Trespass
14 6.1. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1.1— 5.5 as if fully set forth herein.
15 6.2. By not removing its fuel farm, Action is trespassing on the subject property and
16 BEFA has been harmed and is entitled to damages in an amount to be proved at trial.
17 6.3. BEFA is entitled to all reasonable expenses and costs incurred in pursuing this
18 action, and is entitled to have Action remove its fuel farm from the subject property.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Unlawful Detainer
7.1. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1.1 — 6.3 as if fully set forth herein.
7.2. Action is in unlawful possession of the subject property and is therefore in
violation of the Washington Unlawful Detainer statute (RCW 59.12.010 et seq.) and BEFA has
been harmed and is entitled to damages in an amount to be proved at trial. In the alternative,
Action should be ordered ejected from the subject property.
7.3. BEFA is entitled to all reasonable expenses and costs incurred in pursuing this
action, and is entitled to have Action remove its fuel farm from the subject property.
Ist AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, REMEDIAL ACTION DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
COSTS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF - 5
5224 WILSON AVE. S., SUITE 200
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98118
(206)723-2330
FAX: (206)723-2332
1
2
3
4
5
6
I
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1911
21
22
23
24
25
26
Estoppel
8.1. The City of Renton by various actions and representations acquiesced in Action's
operation of the fuel farm.
8.2 BEFA reasonably relied on such actions and representations, and would suffer
unjust detriment if the City of Renton were now allowed to deny the effect of such actions and
representations.
8.3 The City of Renton should be estopped and precluded from demanding that BEFA
remove the fuel farm or any tanks thereof.
V. RELIEF REQUESTED
Plaintiff requests entry of judgment as follows:
1. Awarding Plaintiff damages for Defendant Action's breach of contract;
2. Declaring the rights and obligations of the parties, and ruling who, as between
Action and its officers on the one hand and the City of Renton on the other, has the obligation of
removing the fuel farm;
3. Imposing strict, joint and several liability on Defendants Wiles and Action for
breach of RCW 70.105D.010 et seq. and requiring that said Defendants immediately be required to
comply with that statute and/or other applicable statutes and regulations, whether state or local,
including paying for all costs of remedial action as defined in that statute;
4. Awarding Plaintiff damages against Defendants Action and Wiles for trespass;
5. Awarding Plaintiff damages against Defendants Action and Wiles for their unlawful
detainer;
6. Requiring Defendants to remove the underground fuel farm from the subject
property;
7. Precluding the City of Renton from requiring Plaintiff to remove the fuel farm; and
I st AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, REMEDIAL ACTION DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
COSTS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF - 6 5224 WILSON AVE. S., SUITE 200
SEATPLE, WASHINGTON 98118
(206) 723-2330
FAX: (206) 723-2332
1
2
3
5
I
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
8. Awarding Plaintiffs' reasonable attorney fees, expenses, costs, and disbursements
pursuant to RCW 4.84.030 and RCW 70.105D.080 as against defendants Action and Wiles; and
9. Awarding such additional relief as the Court may deem to be just, equitable, or
Otherwise appropriate.
DATED this /0-& day of Fehis,ev y )2005.
DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
By
JohnVW.Mco, WSBA # 00866
Attorney for Plaintiff �
_l�,/,,pT • �G%7�rh
Z:\BEFA\Action Aviation\cc012105 clean am complaint.doc
1st AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, REMEDIAL ACTION
COSTS, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF - 7
DEMCO LAW FIRM, P.S.
5224 WILSON AVE. S., SUfrE 200
SEATrLE, WASHINGTON 98118
(206) 723-2330
FAX: (206)723-211?
r
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AI N:
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board. .
Staff Contact......
Community Services
Peter Renner Ext. 6605
Subject:
Emergency elevator repairs at 200 Mill Street Building
Exhibits:
Info Paper
For Agenda of: 2/28 105
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept .....
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $38,156.16 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Budgeted in Fund 306 Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $38,156.16 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
X
One of the two elevators at the 200 Mill Building ceased to function because of the failure of parts that
are no longer available. While reviewing the repair and safety upgrade proposal, the other elevator
began to exhibit characteristics indicative of imminent failure. Repairs to both are being made on an
emergency basis. Funds are available from Fund 306 - Chiller Replacement Project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council concur with emergency repair of disabled elevators using excess funds from Fund 306 -
Chiller Replacement Project.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
MEMORANDUM
;:
"u
CITY OF RENTON
COMMUNITY SERVICES
0 Committed to Enriching Lives 0
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the City Council
VIA: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
FROM: Dennis Culp, Community Services Administrator
STAFF CONTACT: Peter Renner, Facilities Director, x6605
SUBJECT: Emergency Elevator Repairs
DATE: February 23, 2005
PURPOSE:
To secure Council ratification of the expenditure of $38,156.16 from Fund 306 — Chiller
Replacement Project to pay for emergency repairs on the two elevators at the 200 Mill
Building.
BACKGROUND:
• There are two elevators in the 200 Mill Building. The doors and their opening
mechanisms recently required emergency repairs. Although the elevators at the
200 Mill Building have been well maintained, they are 37 years old and have not
previously been retrofitted, other than earthquake repairs.
• The door -opening mechanisms required frequent service work by Thyssen -Krupp,
the City's contracted elevator service company. Late last year, Thyssen -Krupp
advised GVA Kidder Matthews, the City's property manager at 200 Mill, that the
doors and opening mechanisms were worn beyond further adjustment and would
require retrofitting. Within three months, one of the doors stopped working and
could not be repaired with existing parts.
• Repair or rebuilt parts are no longer available for the type of doors and opening
mechanisms of the 200 Mill Building elevators. Our choice was to either order
custom -fabricated parts or approve the immediate retrofit of the broken elevator
N I
Terri Briere
February 23, 2005
Page 2
door. Custom -fabricated opening mechanism parts take much longer, are more
expensive than alternative new parts, and do not address the associated issue of
door obsolescence.
• For the retrofit, doors were obtained from another manufacturer, including control
modules, wiring, and programming. These were adapted and retrofitted to the
elevator.
• Concurrently, the other elevator doors began to exhibit operating symptoms
characteristic of imminent failure. Thyssen -Krupp was authorized to retrofit the
second elevator as well. Pending this retrofit, service calls were made almost
daily in order to maintain elevator service to the tenants.
• The retrofit of the doors represents a portion of a complete elevator retrofit that
has been advised by Thyssen -Krupp. A complete retrofit involves replacing the
controls, wiring, and cabling, plus upgrading safety features to current standards.
• The cost to retrofit the two elevator doors and their operating mechanisms is
$38,156.16. Funds are available from Fund 306 — 200 Mill Chiller Replacement.
The project engineer's estimate for the chiller project was $180,000, but the
actual project cost was $121,594.88, leaving a balance of $58,405.12.
C: Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
Larry Warren, City Attorney
Linda Parks, Finance Analyst Supervisor
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of.
Dept/Div/Board.. Economic Development,
February 28, 2005
Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning
Agenda Status
Staff Contact...... Don Erickson (x6581)
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing.. X
Subject:
Correspondence..
Wedgewood Lane Annexation — 60% Direct Petition
Ordinance .............
Resolution ............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Issue Paper,
Study Sessions......
60% Petition
Information.........
KC Certification of Sufficiency
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council concur. Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.
Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue
Generated.........
Total Project Budget N/A City Share Total
Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
The Council accepted a 10% Notice of Intent petition to initiate annexation of approximately 25.63-
acres on December 6, 2004. The subject site at that time included the area between 144th Avenue SE,
if extended, on the west and 148th Avenue SE, north of SE 117th Street on the east, SE I I5th Court, if
extended on the north, and SE 117th Street on the south, east of Honey Creek, and approximately SE
121" Street, west of Honey Creek. At that meeting Council authorized expanding the annexation by
approximately ten acres. The proponents submitted a 60% Petition to Annex on January 18, 2005,
and was certified as sufficient by the King County Department of Assessments on February 3, 2005.
Council is being asked to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex and hold the first public hearing
on future zoning. The Administration is also seeking authorization to forward the Notice of Intent
package to the Boundary Review Board for King County and to prepare zoning and annexation
ordinances for future Council consideration, if it decides to enact this annexation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Council set March 14, 2005 for the first of two required public hearings on future zoning for the
Wedgewood Lane Annexation and to accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex. Staff is also
requesting Council to authorize the Administration to send the Notice of Intent package for the
annexation to the Boundary Review Board for King County and to prepare zoning and annexation
ordinances for later consideration, if Council decides to proceed with this annexation.
H:\EDNSP\PAA\Annexations\Wedgewood to Expanded\Agenda Bill 60%.doc/
CITY OF RENTON
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS AND
STRATEGIC PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 10, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Counc
il
VIA: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
FROM: Alex Pietsch, Administrator kwv `
STAFF CONTACT: Don Erickson (x-6581)
SUBJECT: Wedgewood Lane (Expanded) Annexation — 60% Direct Petition
ISSUE:
Should the Council accept the 60% Direct Petition to Annex, now that the King County
Department of Assessments has certified 60% or more of the annexation area's assessed value is
represented by its signers?
If the Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition, what zoning classification should be applied at
the time of annexation, since the Comprehensive Plan designation allows three different zones?
If the Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition, does it want to authorize the Administration to
forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board to begin its 45-day review
period, pursuant to RCW 36.93.090?
And, if the Council accepts the 60% Direct Petition, does it want to authorize the Administration
to begin preparing the annexation and rezone ordinances for future Council consideration?
RECOMMENDATION:
On the basis of the following analysis, the Administration recommends that Council accept the
60% Direct Petition to Annex for the expanded Wedgewood Lane Annexation. If Council
concurs with this recommendation, the Administration further recommends that Council take the
following action:
• Authorize it to forward the Notice of Intent package to the Boundary Review Board for
King County beginning its mandatory 45-day review period; and,
Wedgewood Lane Annexation — Acceptance of 60% Direct Petition
February 22, 2005
Page 2
• Authorize it to prepare zoning and annexation ordinances for the expanded 35.68-acre
annexation site consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, for future Council consideration.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The City received the 10% Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation petition in October 2004
and, after having the signatures certified by the King County Department of Assessments, held a
required public meeting with the applicants on December 6, 2004. Council, in authorizing
circulation of a 60% Direct Petition, required the area be zoned consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and property owners within it assume their proportionate share of the City's
outstanding indebtedness. Under the Residential Low Density land use designation, three zones
are allowed: Resource Conservation (RC), with one dwelling per 10 acres; R-1, with one unit
maximum per each net acre; and R-4, with four units maximum per net acre. Given that current
King County zoning allows up to six units per gross acre using bonuses and/or development
rights transfers, the City is recommending the denser R-4 zoning for this site.
On January 18, 2005, the City received a 60% Direct Petition to Annex for the expanded 35.68-
acre site and forwarded it to the County for verification of signers and the assessed value they
represent. On February 4, 2005, the King County Department of Assessments notified the City
the signatures listed were sufficient under the provisions of RCW 35.13.002 to equal or exceed
60% of the area's assessed value.
Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.340, the City is required to hold two public hearings before rezoning
the subject annexation site. The first of these is at the time the Council accepts the 60% Direct
Petition to Annex. The second is after the Boundary Review Board for King County completes
its review and approves the proposed annexation.
In the 10% issue paper for this annexation, staff noted that City reviewers had raised no major
obstacles to annexation. Parks noted there was a shortage of neighborhood and community parks
in the area and future parks development would probably take place on existing undeveloped
parklands owned by King County. An estimated one-time public expenditure of $73,499, in
excess of what the City would receive from parks mitigation fees from new construction on the
site, is attributable to this annexation. Also, the Surface Water Utility division noted that the
1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Level-2 flow control requirements should be
required of new development, unless the City adopts stricter standards in the future, in which
case they would apply. The fiscal analysis conducted by staff for this project indicated at full
development there would be a surplus of $30,902 per year, in 2005 dollars.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed expanded Wedgewood Lane Annexation has been certified by the County as
having sufficient signatures to represent 60% or more of the area's assessed valuation. It also
has reasonable boundaries and appears to comply with relevant Boundary Review Board
objectives. Reviewing staff raised no significant obstacles to this annexation. The proposed
expanded Wedgewood Lane Annexation appears to further the City's business goals and be in
the general welfare and interest of the City.
Wedgewood Lane (Expanded) Annexation — 60% Direct Petition
-
-
.�� � rya Q � 0 1 ��
- o
o ° a-,
cr-15
0 0 -- CPU oQ ED
❑ o [� -
41A EX
f::�*'� - a�
6 o
p
�a 1 0 - h -
Q
.��
F-I--V1
El -T -
Elk
EE] CD
a� -- - t
P - —
tPlY
--
t�
- — --
—
�']-- Thta document Is o graphic re rsaentotion, not guaranteed
LJ to survey occurocy, Intended fpir city purposes only and
boned on the boat tnfo tion owilable as of the date shown.
This map la for display purposes only.
Wedgewood Lane Annexation 0 400 goo
gure 3: Existing Structure Map
1 : 4800
ti�Y o{ Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Existing Structure
Alex Pietsch, Administrator — — Renton City Limits
Ye�� G. Del Rosario Note: Annexation boundary may differ from diagram.
�t�NTO$ 8 October 2004 Please see legal description for actual boundary. E 7 Proposed Annexation Area
WEDGEWOOD LANE - REVISED ANNEXATION - FISCAL ANALYSIS SHEET
(35.68 acres)
RevoiitliGs' €I'
...................
.................
................
Cij5t5
Units
Population
AV
Existing dev.
24
60
$6,769,340
Full dev.
114
285
$47,269,340
Assumptions: 2.5 persons / household
$450,000 AV / new unit
$282,056 AV / existing unit
Existing
Full
Rate
Regular levy
$21,256
$148,426
3.14
Excesslevy
$542
$3,782
0.08
State shared revenues
Rate(per cap)
Existing
Full
Liquor tax
$3.52
$211.20
$1,003.20
Li uor Board profits
$5.04
$302.40
$1,436.40
Fuel tax - roads
$14.46
$867.60
$4,121.10
Fuel tax - arterials
$6.47
$388.20
$1,843.95
MVET
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Camper excise
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Criminal justice
$0.36
$21.60
$102.60
Total
$1,791.00
$8,507.25
Micr.PllnnPnus revenues
Rate
Existing
Full
Real estate excise*
$40.86
$2,451.60
$11,645.10
Utility tax**
$133.20
$3,196.80
$15,184.80
Fines & forfeits*
$18.33
$1,099.80
$5,224.05
Totall
1 $6,748.207
$32,053.95
" Per capita
** Per housing unit - based on $2,220 annual utility billing @ 6% tax rate
Per capita
Existing
Full
Contracted Services
Alcohol
$0.23
$13.62
$64.70
Public Defender
$3.13
$188.04
$893.19
Jail
$7.19
$431.52
$2,049.72
Subtotal
$633.18
$3,007.61
Court/legal/admin.
$57.08
$3,424.80
$16,267.80
Parks maintenance*
$14.90
$894.00
$4,246.50
Police
$270.00
$16,200.00
$76,950.00
Road maintenance**
N/A
$500.00
$2,307
Fire***
$1.25
$8,461.68
$59,086.68
Total
$30,113.66
$161, 865.58
* See Sheet Parks FIA
** See Sheet Roads FIA
*** Rate per $1,000 of assessed valuation (FD#25 contract)
C3icosts;: Par 'etiiri ks acquisition & development (from Sheet Parks FIA):
...................
...................
Other one-time costs:
Total revenues
Existing ' ' $3Q; 36';47
Full $1278€A
Total ongoing costs
Existing $ RA-
Net fiscal impact
Existing '222g2
Full s��$3Q��2�
$73,499.00
Total one-time costs: $73,499.Oe
Revised 8-29 per Finance Memo
rile: R-0y-005-
PETITION TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF RENTON
CITY OF: RENTON UNDER RCW 35A.14.120
JAN 18 2005 aV- (60% Petition — Wedgewood Lane Annexation)
TQCEIW CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON
CITY CLERK'»566fith Grady Way
Renton, WA 98055
Applicant: „
Address: /SL o - /3/o'"` h� _ ,c x-
#1;
f4'ZS'
Telephone N . 7y7 l�� xia2
The undersigned are owners of not less than sixty percent (601/6) in value according to the
assessed valuation for general taxation, of real property located contiguous to the City of Renton.
We hereby petition that such property be annexed to the City of Renton under the provisions of
RCW 35A.14.120 et seq.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is contiguous to
the City of Renton. A map (Exhibit 1) and legal description (Exhibit 2) are included as part of
this petition.
In response to a duly filed and considered "Notice of Intention" to commence annexation
proceedings, the City Council of the City of Renton met with the initiating parties under RCW
35A.14.120 onDecember 6, 2004. The City Council then determined that the City would accept
the proposed annexation. Further, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.120, the undersigned petitioners
agree to:
(1) Accept new zoning consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Map designation for the subject property upon annexation;
and,
(2) Assume their proportional share of the City's existing outstanding
indebtedness.
all as noted in the minutes of the Council meeting and contained in the electronic recording of
such meeting.
WHEREFORE, the undersigned property owners petition the City Council and ask:
(a) That the City Council fix a date for a public hearing about such
proposed annexation, cause a notice to be published and posted,
specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all
persons who are interested to appear at the hearing and state their
approval or disapproval of such annexation or to ask questions; and
(b) That following such hearing, and consistent with any approval by the
Boundary Review Board, the City Council by ordinance annex the
above described territory to become part of the City of Renton,
Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in
force, and to receive City public services.
This two page form is one of a number of identical forms which comprise one petition seeking
the annexation of the described territory to the City of Renton, Washington as above stated, and
may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures.
Page 1 of 2
Wedgewood Lane Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING. Every person who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than ene of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate)
Y
S� xj P
signature ands '
�Vl�ing ,
s
llescrrp�ou
llate
Pi lnfeci
(Lo ioe, 1 lat Asser
Iy4c)Co S� / /6�
69
1.
/
Rem �� f )Aw,,T
os
� m� 3 � 3� 2.
e
2.
S C-1,16
12e ,7Zw 9 ros'1
I CJ 223 o 59 3Y 7
$.
i-AfQKFII64%f VA-'(1ICIk
42.vll"Ij R oo"
J
IO2-305136 z
lq.r2 sC 116 s>
tQ�llTbNt 980,51
l d 2-30 59365"
7.
�/� n to �
Gc.�t��.oJ
� S�6ao s r 1,16 Iql 5
E6 �S1ACus/V
2� N 9i
1v23os`f382
8.
1/10/o5
j�/G2o ,SE' ii6,A 5r
w A��l Su �z���/
&N rvN, `j8v5y
/© 2.3 o Ste/ 3 7 0
9.
1/10/0 5
9
AILLIVIKA�
/4-6 z 4 5C 11(0" sr
1 b 2 3 6 5q qS/
"tve S �LLE-V
reeNM#O 98a51
10.
11405
41L1g2
6 sE 1i6 � 5 r
©D� �2 Lon
RERIro,V q$o�y
/a23oS93G3
Page 2 of 2
Wedgewood Lane Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Everyperson who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein an'y false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
Page 2 of 2
Wedgewood Lane Annexation 60% Direct Petition to Annex
WARNING: Everyperson who signs this petition with any other than his or her true name, or who
knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he or
she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he or she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who
makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
The undersigned have read the above petition and consent to the filing of this petition.
(Names of petitioners should be in identical form as the same that appear on record in the chain of title to the real estate.)
f (-05
—
I y6 28 ,5z //6 v", Sr
RW7U) 'TgO5
IO2-305936ce
y
ft-rUtr -s
lryyr " IyB���sE
014W q,
q00 sq
>02 3o15-17
Lax,.-V
!y& /9 1/64 sr
3.
�o O�
k' n
Nlyl �
�� � %has%
lo Z 3 6 5-1 3s p
4.
r
�t
io�PS'
RyVAIIu 0
/o23o03Sq
7
RYnrru
/0230s73Co
i ti e
7UI7L-/00
coCr E 7-e �A)
�12xcAtvA, WA�643
rn23o�c�o�7
q 72o n1 E /zo"P t
5-rE 1
/02-3c) C,1oz3
%<Ii2KLA, 6oF) y8031/
a
10.
Page 2 of 2
LETTER OF CERTIFICATION
WE, the undersigned, certify that we are the owners of King County Assessor Tax Parcel
Numbers 102305-9023, -9017, and -9390, which were recently subject to a Lot Line
Adjustment, and are now Lots A, B and C of King County Lot Line Adjustment No.
L041,0055, as recorded in Volume 180 of Surveys, Pages 222 and 223, under King
County Recording No. 20041223900001.
The undersigned are in the process of consumating a transaction to transfer property
ownership, whereby Wedgewood Lane, LLC will be the sole owner of Lot C of the Lot
Line Adjustment, and CamWest Development and/or CamWest East Renton, LLC, will
be the owners of Lots A and B.
ed epwood Lane, LLC 102305-9390) Date
By: J�'�ti.9�a �• ��.e�ay
Its:
K—Z�I>z x 71 i .,7 o S
CAM ST East nton, LL (as to APN 102305-9017) date
By: jn:,C1c, CA-A"PB&Z.L-
Its: Al#M } (le
CAMWEST De elopment (as to APN 102305-9023) Date
By: CRtc �e¢tfR4�t-L
Its: /C� iaev'J7--
E415C - PEE 2:3
4rr4O 4JO;Nr: k . c.. W-A 0 4 oy c,vo$,-T-
Pam'
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that RICHARD A. GILROY is the person who appeared before me
and acknowledged that he/she signed the instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and
acknowledged it as the jjWPf&,0�t� of WEDGEWOOD LANE, LLC, d voluntary act of such
institution for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. `GK J.
Q� •'•��10N ••`'•
Dated: �// $'' � •.•`•�5S F�-•.%'�'
tl .o
Signature: —� aQa� �aTaRy _�
Name (Print): P/}'%KK(L /I, iU
s PUBLIC
My Appointment Expires: //��/r N:A ��:• p2
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ERIC CAMPBELL is the person who appeared before me and
acknowledged that he/she signed the instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and
acknowledged it as the //JAW#*fi51C, of CAMWEST EAST RENTON, LLC, to be the free and voluntary act of such
institution for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
G
Dated: / T � KJ.
Signature: ,[,�•`5S10NA ,+
Name (Print): �}i�f *fog e5►It / 4�- o� t�aTaRi'
My Appointment Expires:
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
PUBLIC
Z
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ERIC CAMPBELL is the pets i before me and
acknowledged that he/she signed the instrument, on oath stated that he/she was autho ' Ykeo tF ment and
acknowledged it as the of CAMWEST DEVELOPMENT, to, `eM�`vo t of such
institution for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
.,
Dated: /7� a�rC U �OTARy tpm*��
--► H N 1
Signature: (P= PUBLIC s
2
Name (Print): 6/L2Af-' 9>,'•. rl _ 1 -��••• �0
My Appointment Expires: ��-►J/� ��F �/ASN��
KfNG COUNTY, WASHINGTON VCX /PACr
0"OARY U
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
A ';TMEN
PJU, T STATE OF WASHINGTON
KO... L0460055 Ccum OF KA hl 41 P6AS
x OLD LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
........... I CVtnFY THAT I KNOW OK NAME. RATIVACTORY MDENCE THAT _AL4+L*10 At L .�W .;�. — ON
THAT APPEARED BEFORE ME. AND SAIn PFRAON ACIVICNMOM THAT W4SHE DQHEO ON (TAX PARM IMMS-1210)
ACKNOVILMOM IT AS
DtibLARA-TION-, ---%I. -TE THE INS AND Tn" IIA4VD UABXJTY un 1 7 wo mmww.w A AT "m 117704 Fromm Loom KING owm lociIm" Na lwsiww. IN KAG OIK'N",
THAT t I EVFZREl! ZU %CLUNTARY ACT Or 1A USES AND PLAUMM" MFNTIONFI) IN
KNOW MEN BY.TACSE THAT *
I W0HE UNW�W OAN�`%(*)- ',0) PARTY FOR 1INCIA'a WASHINGM.
C
LAND aly..U' ME 110 K INSTRUMENT,
70 ROW ,
S NE
PURSUANTUD HEN ,,04 A 9 OCCARaIlW
THEREOF 1 0 ANO _ :'.S UR& (TAX PAWL lft=1017)
W K THE ORXPNRC
AD,kIS RErRE TATI- nE*THF,%,AUE. AND THAT mm.4 SAIO �IMAWTTNEN`l IS MADJE. Mal Ile Fo MIT I Or )TORT FLAT HOL 117/= ALCONUNNI 10 M SIMI MAT WOVIIIED UIDDI KNO O"TY RE 40. 7SM13
S
WT4 "g CONDUIT
"TICS
2.
FS t� !�f OV'"FR(S) S WKER NAPE DATED
OUR TAKNOTA4415 -'C I* WE KA• G�jo_ .71910Z., 1440!��
-L.% AINTEO un a (TAX FAACEL 101306-som
ormy —Xi-j" ANC Fum 0
A 'T'Al' VMSHP 23 NOR, RUM 5 EAST, RA,
IN I a" mc momim mr or INF w" w OF m w" a&, a NNEmcar"t Gym OF am scumu.7 cumm or S=GN III.
Y APPomTMEN%f R:
)D LANE LLDUIERT CWT WAD (140H AV= wimmi)
%Wnfllc%VN
SASAUTE. IN TTHEMNYY Of Kh% STAR Or WASHINGTON.
AS�;VT, �9�C ANY
— y •
STATE Or WASHIN TON
WASHINGTON FEDERAL SAVINGS, )SS
A L"14D STATES CORPORATION 66UNTY or 410cii
KNOW OR'�AV. SAPSI'?,14IIty EVII)pi6c miAT iTUM, GRICTIONS
AFPPIANEp UEFCAE.MlEm AND
OATH L CH
l't4H �Z—ENT, 1) ACKNOwLEvQw rp A
Za SAIANGS, A
ITS: 'TO ft I� I U, SKATES CORPvRA'.)ON.•S, FASDAENTS, PROWSIONS CONNED ANDANt DLIWAIED ON THE FACE Or THE flJtKY
_to 5 �
F U AND WkJH!AR�,#CT OF S�pi PARTY FO 'THE 6 AND PU. A
INSTRUMEH 5 ONED IN M; almim"
CAWWEST DE V.OPMLMT 2 '"KINK INS SIC IS *MW 10 My AND Al OFRRS IF CEDIC�ATIDK COMXaRra ft EkZAXM MIX UWV.JNU.
A WASHM,GT5r ostoort�
OSOVMQES MONS ARD/N PROWPOKS SHOW OR D601= BY KING C(UNtY SHORT MAT 90 117103. *=NDQ UNDER 04
ODA IT WARW,.,�' 7 A USU
I mo Fwwmm cwgi42K OOOJMUfr DRUID 'SWIM MCA NOTW AS DISMOn
SHE IS R&M TO
DATED, 7'04� 1(� " *T
ED
Touly F,.ZWAW
ilr'i TAT OF tow mma a snomlig
J, "M4 if;�10 SHE *&�YJO PK0WaQNS,O?4�N El�LL pl FOR MWtSS AND CUM Al RSOASEB BY hSTRUwEKr
CA.W.r.T CAST PENTON LLC .4rwNG 4, i4t
A WATTC�nTEl) UA446'ry CoWeANY f APPPGII UEk T EXPIRM.., mj* wo. =K-m
AGA Ir I
S. 14 'Art a 7M.1C1 10 I Ic" "A ff" 01 AN 146DIT AS IXIMM NY ffiTRUWDff RECORDED UNDER IkCW..Q
I'd KaGO
ITS:
"'BE r*"M NQO�OF TAP XCIONNEC1140� "M KAIE DED1 CA KD 0100 ON 11IN
4*-ofvm+ am au it mmom
tl� RE ;t*MMI Of I "aZ AS DISMSED by WMAIDIT RECORDED WDElt RECORIMC NO M210atit,
SIAIL DM WASHINGTON I
-"Qt� IF 7. 1111% AIIE 4 St"cl A"
CouNly IN; _K"?,Jk OG0t'AXfWP= By INSIR" KWVn UNDER RECORDING NO. NUOU221.
wv;64'� IS "I Al DUy"TKN OF W T
MOW OR HAVF -.qAttVACTORY E)AUI,K- THAT IS PFRSOM OA WM By INMAOT KWM UNDER RECORDING IKX NOW12ft
APPROVAL Y. THAT I AND SAID REM" ACKNOWILUICED THAI HE/SHE SIGNED THIS WSMWrNT-. ON M ON ITIF AND X USOIC"NON Cr NNE LAND DUE To X LGC.A7M OF 'CO^I' muAiI
NAT ('HUN ID EIVE
OATH AUTHORIZED TO EXLVUlt THE :HSTRUMENI. AND ACKNOVUDGCD IT AS sou **Aspl.
11PARININT OF 41OPMENT AND ENl':IR-4.aT-A.L`SMVICCS CAM T Mcm?. INC.. A WASIRMSTON CORPMATION, TO
K AND Y�XIWTARY ACT OF SIMH PARTY FOR yE QAS AND PURPOSES MENTIONM IN THE tm am IM IS poNvow or A wwwww or AQWFMNl AS IMS02m IT INXINUOT KCmm
V,
APPROVED THIS7GM':07 ..... ----- Iw" Rmwovs MIS mwxwo 004 Am 2&voom
It. 16 SE 6 SUSICT 10 INE RXHTS W P"T."M ROPER AND INCH' CCWMY TO ENTER THE LA40 10 WAIT REPAIRS AND 70
air SINS;I= WHIDI Ca911111! A MALICE OR DAIW 10 ME EMIM MMl-SSW M *e AS GCDUXg�G a,
LAND __v ON DA
UWWOM PLATTING UNIT NSMAIDITRECOR03) tpw wtuac No. 3z?sx
P i�AVF'_
NO Y PUDUC IN AND PCIR IML
I EXAMINED AND APMRO.D JTA OF AS"N -I
INC COUNTY DEPAMINI"I OF AS 0 0 AT
T JREs; NOTES
.............
KING COUNTY ASSESSOR DEPUTY KING COUNFBaltc
TY ASSCSSOR•• 1. ALL 22Z INFORMADON SHOW IN INS W NAS FIBER OMAM FROM FIRST AMERICAN DIU 111SURANCE CWMY SLIOV"
0
0"AtARTIf IIIRC R"T GRDOI P& 421111I61551. PAID DEMKIIER B. 200A AS 70 LOT A. AND NUMSNATION 11". INSURANO'
COMPAKY &RIMPAM "%MIDE THIRD I" AND t III Mfpmw 2WM13k RATED DECIDABIR 106 2014 AS 10 MIS 0
STATE OF WA.QNGTON INS MOP, CORE OOHH K45 CDAINIMED SIM SUNAV NOt 5 CORE DESIGN AWARE IF MY Atr ISSUES AFFUTNQ DIE
ACCOUNT NOS. 1623050300. SURW" PAMTY GRIER " IWOSIE 2" ON INE VAR AND 0=010) BY THE ABOVE REIT1000) I" AMCM AND I
1123151011 AN 1023051,21 rAINTY OF it •'AILE CMIMRUIW� CORE BCSIQN HAS ROM IIHMLY IN MR AMOKM AND RAMATION BILL O[SIP"T
........ . ATOKS OF If. IM Fr CONDRION M PREPARE THIS MONEY AND THEREFORE CORE DESIGN WAUF= ]HE WAP'S ACCURACY
I CERTOY MAT I KNOW I* HAw sAmsrAcTorYhrDENcE T4ir of"t-tf"d- Cft&iI22Z-:I' THE PMVA" 9�� ID IIIAT rAmst,
THAT APPEARED OOFO`F MF, AND SAID PEW"'AL'KNU*uDGED*'"T ' �K It nn.
IT
WE WAS AUIMOKIZLD TO EXECUTE THE 'MEVSHE SIGNED TMIS
CXWANY/FF. TO 9E THE IHtk AND — ow %:AoWFV&St EAST RWTCN LLIT='N. .1r a,'Ty 1: I/s Is A FEW iihOti[ SURAY. A SOW 5 SECING IlECWKMC TIRM StAIK01 VAS USED M MEASURE at MMA Naa
V"UN M Ere
TARY AC .3 IN
711C INSTRUMENT. I 7w, Umd AND PoripcSES LCRANII THE CONTRCUM MORIANDRADON AS SHOWN. CLOSURE. RATIOS OF ad TRA'mA A( Im LaaLTFD
-pIr WAC 311- USUNCC A"SUP" EQUIRMAIT K43 BOD4 COMPARED TO M NAM "SEEM UBM ONE TEA
J. "WA�. I .:' " -C "' F 14�011WI "Upt MIKE Rmb.
APPROVAL NOTES: MTED 'G A. ML1O""aw`S AS Wm
THIS REDUE I CUAUFIES I'DR EXEMPTION UNDER KOC igA.2& IT DOES NOT *OTAN). Hue _Jkk6ff' .'
y
S GUARANTEE PUBUC IN AND H)N THE
THAT THE LOT. YAtg WiAt%EfpoK IN THE 2, . 7 SFER or O=TT.Cwow OR ;;i*�l T FAIA!!ppy' ......
UML 'ME
LEGAL T
By SEPARATE
D T
SAME OYI� ATE INSTRUMENT, UNLESS ALL INE L071 HFADH ARE UNDER THE F• I. -OINTMENT EXPURES a A—
msw.
FUR.10ONS OF. ME SF. 41461"I-HE NE. 1/4:4: AND4.' S
RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE .................... LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE nlcjJ I/A OF THESE. 1/4. SEC. 10
Rap FOR RECORD JHI-;2-l.DAY 0 THIS BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSTMENT CORRE com
AIJAV. M IN DOW. 0 OFFH� ...AT P AGZ.. e-, A I REPRESENTS A SUNWY MADE FIT ME OR UNDER MY RccoltblNo 0.
X " y
EQUEST OF STEPHEN J. SCHRE3
THE R DIRECTION IN CO FORMANCr4w S4T iH SrA,7. AN. COUNTY
STATUTES IN . gl$ER,
14711 Me. 29)h Mix., #101 L)VIN. UY JOB IP?�.
A.M.—N W."91- 90007
.. ................... .............. 1"20 .6
frT
SUPT. OF RECMh.'; CERTIFICATE NO. J7555 423.085.78" 1— 42MO5.7963 SCALE c"Ill. rly IS t"" OF
ING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
0 UN: ARY
A.VJUSTM NT
-O.--:':'d4-L0055
.... ....... * ......
- '."' / .2 .2- .-4 900 0 <;,/
4"
OLD LOT AREA
-M 1- AREA
LOT
840,1.17* If.
415,264:1, IF.
A
(14 .70.61 At)
AC)
LOT
640.756A IF.
74ck030* S.F.
(14.7007k At)
(17.00031 At)
LOT
213.127* IF.
&r.
C
(4.6017* At)
41
7.764a* At)
I'
1DTAL1.
4. k &r.
(34.3071d;
1,4N,4132 IF
(34.3071* At)
.............
CA
r 2v A- EAT
RC N3. �t�v.
a Co. r
X PLAT
. * : . RFC END. 776 111
fDT 2*'&TY-& FVITON
UM.ATMI) A. LK I "I V 1/4.
'A QL' '"PLATTED
1 �g
�.hgsgf 46
LOT A
41-
1 �E I 111v ,.LOT C
.4.
..... IAS la LOT
.-Y Q" V RLN;tw •WwW
PM7 N:, 11145 'OJND I-
(mzln j0muiar "III DID lot IINE.........
cs
1.
401 3 2 .0,W11IT No, w7i—
Mr t
'n.UN pa
X
94
SCALE- 1" LOT 13
<
3?D
02'
F 24,
01 31
cruNna QNI
0, 194
fGRd "'Zt7 wk*cm
SCvAkIl KI
AIOCI (01
Irt;
:P. q
It :CACK M 1.6 IN
......
r. I oulf. Ii
PER K[F NC. C
7T%
.
I'r. 1 0' 1
Iff"X Tom cm
-1"
P: "1
13t.
ar' OF MX'QK
ill No
qua
10
is 4
SUBDIVISION
DIAGRAM
1' - low
BASIS OF BEARINGS
Nwon, 'E BETWM 'NE WONUMINTS FOUND IN PLACE AT
QUARTER AND NCRTNEAST CORNER OF SECTION
PER REF. I
REFERENCES
I- RECORD Or RAWY By KM�k AMD _AK1tWJCN'NM
REQ NM 0805149004.
VOL./PA(
C'>-�sk TIN
OW .� .. CAU,
C OF PENT V
CONTTIOL P_. ho. too
30'v
W" SEPX-
WIrco
y ^ c M., a
awIII'
\ 9
7zx
".* "OUt
�y -F— I
e� V.umAqT
ron 0 LOT LINE,
I/-. w 1/4. sm ill-n
./7
Im Am r
11sw A:iLIYS III
i4ml-rf
/Z i J.V
a
UASMT 11ji
X V
V
X TO,
KI 1" 19 'U2
14711 ME 2% fl—, #101
A.".* W.Wkww VSW7
42"SS.7M Fax 425.8857003
Q IND. OY
Oi'IHE K.:-i"/'4OF*'t'F NF.. 1/4:'0
1/4 OF THvsc. 1/4. 1-5
... ��Ec.
.V
"
AM
Date
TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
Bosair, LLC Lease Addendum 03-05
(Referred February 7, 2005)
The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff
recommendation to approve Lease Addendum 03-05 to LAG-003-86 with Bosair, LLC to
increase the leased area by 21,510 square feet to allow aircraft access to B s ir's hangar, and
provide for an increase in ground rental rate from $.27 to $.31 per square Musing the
Consumer Price Index for Urban Seattle, resulting in a total annual rent increase of $4,724.
The Committee further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the
lease addendum with Bosair, LLC.
V�tAV'&_
Marcie Palmer, Chair
Don Persson, Vice -Chair
andy Corman, Member
cc: Connie Brundage
Susan Campbell -Rehr
Kathie Nye
Date a -a "005_
TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
Kaynan, Inc. Lease Addendum 10-05
(Referred February 7, 2005)
The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff
recommendation to approve Lease Addendum 10-05 to LAG-003-84 with Kaynan, Inc. for an
increase of 6,260 square feet in the leased area to include pavement adjacent to the taxilane at
the airport resulting in added revenue of $2,050 per year.
The Committee further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the
lease addendum to the Kaynan, Inc. lease.
Marcie Palmer, Chair
Don Persson, Vice -Chair
A(e_
R dy Corman, Member
cc: Connie Brundage
Susan Campbell-Hehr
Kathie Nye
FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
Date
APPROVAL OF CLAIMS AND PAYROLL VOUCHERS
The Finance Committee approves for payment on February 28, 2005, claim vouchers 234898-235346
and 2 wire transfers, totaling $1,132,929.17 , and 570 direct deposits, payroll vouchers 55893-
56118, and 1 wire transfer, totaling $1,850,535.00 .
Don Persson, Chair --�
Toni Nelson, Vice- hair
w
Denis Law, Member
0 BY
1 u"L' COUNCIlL
FINANCE COMMITTEE a_��_ BOOS
COMMITTEE REPORT Date
February 28, 2005
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR INFORMATION SERVICES
MANAGEMENT WITH GM2 SYSTEMS (GEORGE McBRIDE)
(referred February 7, 2005)
The Finance Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the
Annual Consultant Agreement with GM2 Systems, George McBride, President.
The Committee recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the
Annual Consultant Agreement
6�
Don Persson, Chair
Toni Nelson, Vice Chair
&" Lj' A','
Denis Law, Member
cc: Linda Parks, Fiscal Services Director
GM2 Systems contract.doc
Date a - a 8- Roos -
FINANCE COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
Fee Schedule Agreement with Healthcare Management Administrators
(referred January 24, 2005)
The Finance Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to approve the
Fee Schedule Agreement with Healthcare Management Administrators for 2005 and 2006
employee medical plan administration.
The Committee recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the fee
schedule agreement.
Don Persson, Chair
Toni Nelson, Vice Chair
&.." Lj. 4,
Denis W. Law, Member
cc: Mike Webby, HR & RM Administrator
Terri Shuhart, HR Benefits Analyst
Document9\
FeeSchedulel-IMA.doc\ Rev 01105 bh
P-77"ITED BY
t.. J COUNCIL
UTILITIES COMMITTEE Date R- 2 S- R00,5
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank
(Referred February 14, 2005)
The Utilities Committee recommends concurrence in the staff recommendation to collaborate
with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to create the Springbrook
Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank on approximately 130 acres of City -owned .
property located west of SR-167 and south of I-405. The Committee further aut�er�a�s the
Mayor 4a. sign the Letter of Concurrence with WSDOT.
Randy Corman, Chair
an Clawson, Vice Chair
Don Persson, Member
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
e
aos
4
3
5
2
w
`�►� 1D-
8
9
10
11
R E N T 0 N
SITE
NE 47H ST.
SE 128TH ST.
BM PT.
BM PT.
dF-
1852
2103
GREENWOOD
CEMETERY
17 169
16
15
14
� y�
CEDAR
�
!t�
MAPLEWOOD
GOLF COURSE
VICINIT 0 MAP
_0'±
CARLO PROPERTY PAGE
LAROELHURST/RENTON
10F 2
ROAD VACATION EXHIBIT
14711 N.E.29t6 Place Suite 101
Con Fox 4 Bellevue, Woshi98007
425.885.7877 Fax 25.8857963
DESIGN
ENGINEERING ENNGGINNEEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING
JOB NO_ 02052
�'4L L13�/
NE CORNER NORTH HALF
NE1/4, SE1/4, NW1/4
SEC. 15-23-05
0
N
PORTION OF 140TH AVE SE //
TO BE VACATED
30
N
W
� N
c�
SCALE 1 " = 50' M o
S LINE NORTH HALF 30
NE1/4, NW7/4 //
SEC. 15-23--23-OS
PORTION OF VACATED
140TH AVE. NE.
PER KING CO. ORDINANCE
NO. 13228 I
REC. NO. 20020208002079
I
S.E. 132ND ST.
I
i 1
W z%
w
a Q
o \
o 0 `
�v I 15
I \
16
IPUGET COLONY\
HOMES
F
17 /
I/ 5
CARLO PROPERTY PAGE
LARUELHURST/RENTON 1• Q
ROAD VACATION EXHIBIT 2 OF 2 y: of WARWAS'.
I A CO14711
4 14i ME 19th Suite 101 Sp0 :• O
Belfewe, Washingttonon 98007 •. t �•9.=
425.885.7877 Fax 425.885.7963 ��y '•.I gStf-'
DESIGN Z. L11�
ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING jgg$; 10 26 pp
04
JOB NO_ 02052
EXHIBIT A
CORE DESIGN, INC.
BELLEVUE WA 98007
Core Project No: 02052
03/08/04
Legal Description — Street Vacation (Portion of 140th Ave. S.E.)
The east 30.00 feet of the north half of the northeast quarter of the southeast
quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,
W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington;
Except the north 20.00 feet thereof.
02052L1 l .doe, 3/8/04, page 1
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION III. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication.
A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed with the Office of Records and Elections,
and as otherwise provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1173:2/23/05:ma
I
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
2005.
2005.
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION I. The following described portion of unimproved road located on
140th Avenue S.E. between S.E. 132"d Street and S.E. 136th Street, to wit:
[The right-of-way 20 feet in width and approximately 308 feet in length, of
140th Avenue S.E., south of S.E. 132nd Street]
See Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully
set forth herein
is hereby vacated subject to a stormwater utility easement over, across, under and on all the
following described area in favor of the City:
The East 10.00 feet of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in the
City of Renton, King County, Washington.
This easement is for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, installing, repairing, replacing,
enlarging, operating and maintaining utilities and utility pipelines, including, but not limited to,
water, sewer and storm drainage lines, together with the right of ingress and egress thereto. The
City may also construct such additional facilities as it may require. This easement is subject to
the following terms and conditions:
That a utility easement will be retained by the City over the above -described area, with
the understanding that the property may be developed fully if the existing utilities are relocated,
with the City's approval, at the sole cost of the developer; and
That this easement shall run with the land described herein, and shall be binding upon the
parties, and their heirs and successors in interest and assigns.
SECTION II. The City Council hereby elects to charge a compensation amount
of $16,500 (Sixteen Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars) to the petitioner -owners.
2
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
VACATING A PORTION OF UNIMPROVED ROAD LOCATED ON
140T" AVENUE S.E. BETWEEN S.E. 132ND STREET AND S.E. 136T"
STREET. (CONNER HOMES, VAC-04-001)
WHEREAS, a proper petition for vacating a portion of unimproved road located
on 140th Avenue S.E. between S.E. 132nd Street and S.E. 1361h Street was filed with the
City Clerk on or about April 15, 2004, and that petition was signed by the owners
representing more than two-thirds (2/3) of the property abutting upon the street or alley to
be vacated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 3691, passed on May 17, 2004, set
June 14, 2004, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the City of Renton as the time and
place for a public hearing on this matter; and the City Clerk having given proper notice of this
hearing as provided by law, and all persons having been heard who appeared to testify in favor or
in opposition on this matter, and the City Council having considered all information and
arguments presented to it; and
WHEREAS, the Administrator of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department has
considered this petition for vacation, and has found it to be in the public interest and for the
public benefit, and that no injury or damage to any person or properties will result from this
vacation;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1
February 1, 2005
EXHIBIT C
Cedar River Monitoring 2005
Proposed Budget
P05-1060
Task
Task Description
Project
Cost/Task
Labor
Labor
Subtotal
Travel
Field Equipment
Misc.
Budget
Hours
Overhead
profit
Fax/Phone/Copies
(164.94%)
(12%)
100
Project
110
3,519.56
5,601.73
1,094.55
10,215.84
145.80
-
-
11,001.64
Management
200
Fry Monitoring
576
14,685.44
23,373.35
4,567.05
42,625.84
1,283.85
2,451.22
40.00
46,400.91
300
Landsburg
180
4,775.76
7,601.10
1,485.22
13,862.08
135.68
1,190.50
-
15,188.26
Physical Surveys
400
Vegetation
26
788.92
1,255.65
245.35
2,289.92
40.00
147.85
-
2,477.77
Surveys
500
Lower Cedar
36
1,100.88
1,752.16
342.37
3,195.41
55.08
272.48
-
3,522.97
River Spawner
Surveys
600
Side -Channels
90
2,752.20
4,380.40
855.91
7,988.51
182.25
226.25
-
8,397.01
S awner Surveys
700
Report Writing
122
3,792.32
6,035.86
1,179.38
11,007.56
-
-
1,400.00
12,407.56
TOTAL
I
I
I
I
I
1
1 99,396.12
0108pc3.doc
February 1, 2005
EXHIBIT B
Cedar River Monitoring Timeline
P05-1060
Page 2 of 2
July
August
September
I
October
November December
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005 2005
Task 100
5
Project Management
61s,
Task 200
Fry Monitoring
Task 300
Landsburg Physical Surveys
Task 400
Vegetation Surveys
Task 500
Lower River Spawning Surveys
Task 600
Side -Channel Spawning Surveys
Task 700
W
Report Writing
L
Rev. 2 2005 timeline Ldoc
February 1, 2005
EXHIBIT B
Cedar River Monitoring Timeline
P05-1060
Page 1 of 2
January
February
March
April May June
2005
2005
2005
2005 2005 2005
Task 100
A
Project Management
Task 200
a
g"
Fry Monitoring
Task 300
Landsburg Physical Surveys
Task 400
Vegetation Surveys
Task 500
Lower River Spawning Surveys
Task 600
Side -Channel Spawning Surveys
Task 700
Report Writing
Rev. 2 2005 timeline Ldoc
City of Renton
Mr. Christian Munter
February 1, 2005
P05-1060
records. Please note that if further research or monitoring is required, Golder will notify the City of
Renton and discuss both scope and budget modifications.
We trust the foregoing is satisfactory for your current needs. If you should have any questions or
require additional information, please do not hesitate to call us at (425) 883-0777.
Sincerely,
GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC.
Doug Dunster
Principal
Attachments
DD/PC/tp
0108pcl.doc
Paul Conrecode
Project Fisheries Biologist
City of Renton February 1, 2005
Mr. Christian Munter 2 P05-1060
gravel samples taken from the source pile to determine if the material meets WDFW
specifications.
Task 400: Vegetation Surveys: This task will include vegetation monitoring to ensure survival
of mitigation planting and to determine if maintenance activities to remove non-
native invasive plants should be undertaken. The plantings in Elliot
Rearing/Spawning Side -Channel will be evaluated for percent cover, canopy cover,
and percent survival. Photos will be taken from the pre -established points to assess
the overall vegetation to ensure plots are representative of the entire area. This task
will also include coordination with groups working with restoration plantings.
Task 500: Lower Cedar River Sockeye Spawning. The objective of spawning surveys is to
determine the location and total number of live sockeye and chinook, and their redds,
between the mouth of the Cedar River at Lake Washington and the I-405 Bridge.
The surveys will be conducted in three field days corresponding to the peak of
spawning, and two weeks prior and two weeks subsequent to that date —
approximately: October 5, October 20, and November 5. Redds and fish will be
counted on surveys conducted by foot that use the high banks and numerous bridges
of downtown Renton, and serve as a check on WDFW and tribal boat surveys
conducted by boat. Redds and fish will be counted by river reach as previously
conducted.
Task 600: Elliot Rearing/Spawning Side -Channel and Newly -Constructed Side -Channel
Spawning Surveys. Surveys will be conducted to determine total number of live
fish, number of redds, and redd locations. Surveys will be conducted biweekly, and
weekly at the peak of spawning.
Task 700: Report Preparation.
This task includes the preparation of the final report of all the data collected from
tasks 200 through 600. Each report will be submitted within 60 days following
completion of the last monitoring date for each task. Four reports will be prepared:
1. Results of fry monitoring.
2. Results of Landsburg physical surveys.
3. Results of vegetation survey, including recommendations.
4. Results of lower main stem and side -channel sockeye spawning
surveys.
ASSUMPTIONS
Golder staff will have access to the site for field visits.
ESTIMATED COST
We will complete the scope of work for an estimated fee of $99,390.13 The estimated costs and
timeline to complete the proposed scope of work are detailed and presented in Exhibits B and C. The
contract for this work is also attached. Upon your approval, please sign and return a copy for our
EXHIBIT A
January 31, 2005
City of Renton
Utility Systems Division -Surface Water
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, Washington 98055
ATTENTION: Christian Munter, P.E., Project Manager
RE: CEDAR RIVER MONITORING 2005
Dear Mr. Munter:
Our ref: P05-1060
The following is a scope of work presented by Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) to complete fisheries
monitoring activities during 2005 on the Cedar River, in Renton, Washington. The monitoring is
required to ensure that proposed mitigation actions adequately address any significant environmental
impacts from the USACE Cedar River Section 205 Flood Damage Reduction Project implemented by
the Corp of Engineers and the City of Renton. The following includes a proposed scope of work and
budget to complete the fieldwork and reports for this project.
SCOPE OF WORK
The following is a list of tasks that need to be completed to successfully perform each monitoring
component.
Task 100: Project Management: This task includes tracking project budget and submitting a
"percent task completed" update with each invoice to the City of Renton. It will also
involve periodic discussions with the City of Renton, and other agencies involved in
similar work on the Cedar River.
Task 200: Fry production in Elliot Rearing/Spawning Channel: This task includes use of
fyke nets to assess sockeye fry emergence and outmigration from the side -channel to
determine survival -to -emergence of embryos from fall and winter spawning, and
overall fry production from the side -channel. Fry outmigration will be monitored
two nights per week from March through May. Secondary objectives include
characterization of emergence and outmigration timing, use of side -channels by other
salmonids, and use of side -channel by non-salmonid fishes.
Task 300: Landsburg Physical Surveys: This task's objective is to determine channel changes
after gravel supplementation consistent with previous years' methods. It includes
five cross -sectional river surveys, and five Wolman pebble counts. Task 300 also
includes snorkel surveys to determine if adult steelhead or Chinook spawners are in
the area, water quality monitoring associated with gravel placement, and analysis of
XIV
SUBLETTING OR ASSIGNING OF CONTRACTS
The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the work covered by this Agreement without the express consent of
the City.
XV
ENDORSEMENT OF PLANS
The Consultant shall place their certification on all plans, specifications, estimates or any other engineering data
furnished by them in accordance with RCW 18.43.070.
XVI
COMPLETE AGREEMENT
This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the
parties. Any supplements to this Agreement will be in writing and executed and will become part of this Agreement.
No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be liable
for, any statement, representation, promise, or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or
modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment
to this Agreement.
The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions hereof,
and this Agreement shall be construed in all respects as if such invalid or unenforceable provision were omitted.
XVII
EXECUTION AND ACCEPTANCE
This Agreement may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original having identical legal effect. The Consultant does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Request for Qualifications, and the supporting materials
submitted by the Consultant, and does hereby accept the Agreement and agrees to all of the terms and conditions
thereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.
Z/8/() 5
Date
CJy V1_ rA ac r1�H
type or print name
Title
CITY OF RENTON
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Date
ATTEST:
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GolderContract2005\2005GolderContract.doc\ c 9 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts
/2000_Consultant.doc bh
The Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and
shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands or suits at law or equity arising in whole or part
from the Consultant's errors, omissions, or negligent acts under this Agreement provided that nothing herein shall
require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based
upon the conduct of the City, its officers or employees and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by
or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the Consultant's agents or employees and (b) the City, its agents,
officers and employees, this provision with respect to claims or suits based upon such concurrent negligence shall be
valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or
employees except as limited below.
The Consultant shall secure general liability, property damage, auto liability, and professional liability coverage in
the amount of $1.0 million, with a General Aggregate in the amount of $2 million, unless waived or reduced by the
City. The Consultant shall submit a completed City of Renton Insurance Information Form, and the Standard Acord
Certification Form prior to the execution of the contract. The City of Renton shall be named as an "additional
insured" on all contracts/projects. The Consultant shall also submit copies of the declarations pages of relevant
insurance policies to the City within 30 days of contract acceptance if requested. The Certification and Declaration
page(s) shall be in a form as approved by the City. If the City's Risk Manager has the Declaration page(s) on file
from a previous contract and no changes in insurance coverage has occurred, only the Certification Form will be
required.
The limits of said insurance shall not, however, limit the liability of Consultant hereunder.
All coverages provided by the Consultant shall be in a form, and underwritten by a company acceptable to the City.
The City will normally require carriers to have minimum A.M. Best rating of A XII. The Consultant shall keep all
required coverages in full force and effect during the life of this project, and a minimum of forty five days' notice
shall be given to the City prior to the cancellation of any policy.
The Consultant shall verify, when submitting first payment invoice and annually thereafter, possession of a current
City of Renton business license while conducting work for the City. The Consultant shall require, and provide
verification upon request, that all subconsultants participating in a City project possess a current City of Renton
business license. The Consultant shall provide, and obtain City approval of, a traffic control plan prior to
conducting work in City right-of-way.
The Consultant's relation to the City shall be at all times as an independent contractor.
HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GolderContmct2005\2005GoiderContract.doc\ c 8 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts
/2000_Consultant.doc bh
C. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City other than for fault on the part of the Consultant, a
final payment shall be made to the Consultant for actual cost for the work complete at the time of
termination of the Agreement, plus the following described portion of the net fee. The portion of the ne4
fee for which the Consultant shall be paid shall be the same ratio to the total net fee as the work complet,
is to the total work required by the Agreement. In addition, the Consultant shall be paid on the same
basis as above for any authorized extra work completed. No payment shall be made for any work
completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the Consultant of the Notice to Terminate. If the
accumulated payment made to the Consultant prior to Notice of Termination exceeds the total amount
that would be due as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the Consultant shall
immediately reimburse the City for any excess paid.
D. In the event the services of the Consultant are terminated by the City for fault on the part of the
Consultant, the above stated formula for payment shall not apply. In such an event the amount to be paid
shall be determined by the City with consideration given to the actual costs incurred by the Consultant in
performing the work to the date of termination, the amount of work originally required which was
satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether that work is in a form or of a type which is
usable to the City at the time of termination, the cost to the City of employing another firm to complete
the work required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value
to the City of the work performed at the time of termination. Under no circumstances shall payment
made under this subsection exceed the amount which would have been made if the formula set forth in
subsection C above had been applied.
E. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to completion of the work, the original copies of all
Engineering plans, reports and documents prepared by the Consultant prior to termination shall become
the property of the City for its use without restriction. Such unrestricted use not occurring as a part of
this project, shall be without liability or legal exposure to the Consultant.
F. Payment for any part of the work by the City shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any remedies of
any type it may have against the Consultant for any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant, or for
failure of the Consultant to perform work required of it by the City. Forbearance of any rights under the
Agreement will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act
or omission by the Consultant.
XII
DISPUTES
Any dispute concerning questions of facts in connection with work not disposed of by agreement between the
Consultant and the City shall be referred for determination to the Director of Planning/ Building/Public Works or
his/her successors and delegees, whose decision in the matter shall be final and conclusive on the parties to this
Agreement.
In the event that either party is required to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any of its rights in this
Agreement, both parties agree that any such action shall be brought in the Superior Court of the State of
Washington, situated in King County.
XIII
LEGAL RELATIONS
The Consultant shall comply with all Federal Government, State and local laws and ordinances applicable to the
work to be done under this Agreement. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws
of Washington.
HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GolderContract2005\2005GolderContract.doc\ c 7 Piaua/Data_Center/Fortns/City/Contracts
/2000_Consultant.doc bh
and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act on behalf of said employees, while so
engaged and any and all claims made by a third party as a consequence of any negligent act or omission on the part
of the Consultant's employees, while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall
be the sole obligation and responsibility of the Consultant.
The Consultant shall not engage, on a full or part-time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any
professional or technical personnel who are, or have been at any time during the period of this contract, in the
employ of the City except regularly retired employees, without written consent of the City.
If during the time period of this Agreement, the Consultant finds it necessary to increase its professional, technical,
or clerical staff as a result of this work, the Consultant will actively solicit minorities through their advertisement
and interview process.
X
NONDISCRIMINATION
The Consultant agrees not to discriminate against any client, employee or applicant for employment or for services
because of race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex, age or handicap except for a bona fide occupational
qualification with regard to, but not limited to the following: employment upgrading; demotion or transfer;
recruitment or any recruitment advertising; layoff or termination's; rates of pay or other forms of compensation;
selection for training; rendition of services. The Consultant understands and agrees that if it violates this Non -
Discrimination provision, this Agreement may be terminated by the City and further that the Consultant shall be
barred from performing any services for the City now or in the future, unless a showing is made satisfactory to the
City that discriminatory practices have terminated and that recurrence of such action is unlikely.
XI
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time upon not less than ten (10) days
written notice to the Consultant, subject to the City's obligation to pay Consultant in accordance with
subparagraphs C and D below.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory
personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the
work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar
to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the
City so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving
members of the Consultant, with the City's concurrence, desire to terminate this Agreement, payment
shall be made as set forth in Subsection C of this section.
HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GOiderCOntract2005\2005GolderContract.doc\ c 6 Piaaa/Data_Center/Forrns/City/Contracts
/2000 Consultant.doc bh
A short narrative progress report shall accompany each voucher for progress payment. The report shall include
discussion of any problems and potential causes for delay.
To provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for consultant employees, the City may conduct employet.
interviews.
Acceptance of such final payment by the Consultant shall constitute a release of all claims of any nature, related to
this Agreement, which the Consultant may have against the City unless such claims are specifically reserved in
writing and transmitted to the City by the Consultant prior to its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however,
be a bar to any claims that the City may have against the Consultant or to any remedies the City may pursue with
respect to such claims.
The Consultant and its subconsultants shall keep available for inspection, by the City, for a period of three years
after final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement and all items related to, or bearing
upon, these records. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the three-year retention
period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims or audit findings involving the records have been
resolved. The three-year retention period starts when the Consultant receives final payment.
VII
CHANGES IN WORK
The Consultant shall make all such revisions and changes in the completed work of this Agreement as are necessary
to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the City, without additional compensation.
Should the City find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts
thereof revised, the Consultant shall make such revisions, if requested and as directed by the City in writing. This
work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as provided in Section VIII.
VIII
EXTRA WORK
The City may desire to have the Consultant perform work or render services in connection with the Project in
addition to or other than work provided for by the expressed intent of the Scope of Work. Such work will be
considered as Extra Work and will be specified in a written supplement which will set forth the nature and scope
thereof. Work under a supplement shall not proceed until authorized in writing by the City. Any dispute as to
whether work is Extra Work or work already covered under this Agreement shall be resolved before the work is
undertaken. Performance of the work by the Consultant prior to resolution of any such dispute shall waive any claim
by the Consultant for compensation as Extra Work.
IX
EMPLOYMENT
The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract and that he has not paid or agreed to
pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award
or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this
Agreement without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration or otherwise
recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the Consultant, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the
Consultant under this Agreement, shall be considered employees of the Consultant only and not of the City and any
HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GOlderCOntract2005\2005GolderContract.doc\ c 5 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts
/2000_Consultant.doc bh
VI
PAYMENT
The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided
hereinafter as specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed
or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the
work. All billings for compensation for work performed under this Agreement will list actual time (days and/or
hours) and dates during which the work was performed and the compensation shall be figured using the rates in
Exhibit C. Payment for this work shall not exceed $ 99,396.12 without a written amendment to this contract, agreed
to and signed by both parties.
Cost Plus Net Fee
Payment for work accomplished shall be on the basis of the Consultant's actual cost plus a net fee. The actual cost
includes direct salary cost, overhead, and direct non -salary cost.
I . The direct salary cost is the salary expense for professional and technical personnel and principals for the
time they are productively engaged in the work necessary to fulfill the terms of this Agreement. The
direct salary costs are set forth in the attached Exhibit C and by this reference made a part of this
Agreement.
2. The overhead costs as identified on Exhibit C are determined as 164.94 percent of the direct salary cost
and by this reference made a part of this Agreement. The overhead cost rate is an estimate based on
currently available accounting information and shall be used for all progress payments over the period of
the contract.
3. The direct non -salary costs are those costs directly incurred in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement,
including, but not limited to travel, reproduction, telephone, supplies, and fees of outside consultants.
The direct non -salary costs are specified in Exhibit C, Cost Estimate. Billings for any direct non -salary
costs shall be supported by copies of original bills or invoices. Reimbursement for outside consultants
and services shall be on the basis of times the invoiced amount.
4. The net fee, which represents the Consultants profit shall be 12 percent of direct salary plus overhead
costs. This fee is based on the Scope of Work and the estimated labor hours therein. In the event a
supplemental agreement is entered into for additional work by the Consultant, the supplemental
agreement will include provision for the added costs and an appropriate additional fee. The net fee will
be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of the project completed as estimated in the
Consultant's monthly progress reports and approved by the City. Any portion of the net fee not
previously paid in the monthly payments shall be included in the final payment, subject to the provisions
of Section XI entitled TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.
Progress payments may be claimed monthly for direct costs actually incurred to date as supported by
detailed statements, for overhead costs and for a proportionate amount of the net fee payable to the
Consultant based on the estimated percentage of the completion of the services to date. Final payment of
any balance due the Consultant of the gross amount earned will be made promptly upon its verification
by the City after completion and acceptance by the City of the work under this Agreement. Acceptance,
by the Consultant of final payment shall constitute full and final satisfaction of all amounts due or
claimed to be due.
Payment for extra work performed under this Agreement shall be paid as agreed to by the parties hereto in writing at
the time extra work is authorized. (Section VIII "EXTRA WORK").
HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GoiderCOntract2005\2005GoiderContract.doc\ c 4 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts
/2000_Consultant.doc bh
IV
OWNERSHIP OF PRODUCTS AND
DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CONSULTANT
Documents, exhibits or other presentations for the work covered by this Agreement shall be furnished by the
Consultant to the City upon completion of the various phases of the work. All such material, including working
documents, notes, maps, drawings, photo, photographic negatives, etc. used in the project, shall become and remain
the property of the City and may be used by it without restriction. Any use of such documents by the City not
directly related to the project pursuant to which the documents were prepared by the Consultant shall be without any
liability whatsoever to the Consultant.
All written documents and products shall be printed on recycled paper when practicable. Use of the chasing -arrow
symbol identifying the recycled content of the paper shall be used whenever practicable. All documents will be
printed on both sides of the recycled paper, as feasible.
V
TIME OF BEGINNING AND COMPLETION
The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed according to Exhibit B, Time Schedule of Completion,
attached hereto and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services are to
be completed and all products shall be delivered by the Consultant unless there are delays due to factors that are
beyond the control of the Consultant. The Consultant shall not begin work under the terms of this Agreement until
authorized in writing by the City. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed, the Consultant is delayed in the performance
of its services by factors that are beyond its control, the Consultant shall notify the City of the delay and shall
prepare a revised estimate of the time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to the City for
its approval. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as
otherwise herein.
Delays attributable to or caused by one of the parties hereto amounting to 30 days or more affecting the completion
of the work may be considered a cause for renegotiation or termination of this Agreement by the other party.
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GolderContract2005\2005GolderContract.doc\ c 3 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts
/2000_Consultant.doc bh
Washington State Department of Transportation/American Public Works Association (WSDOT/APWA),
"Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction," as amended by Renton
Standard Specification.
2. WSDOT/APWA, "Standard Plans for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction."
Washington State Department of Transportation, "Highway Design Manual."
4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "Standard Specifications for
Highway Bridges."
Washington State Department of Transportation, "Bridge Design Manual, Volumes I and 2."
Washington State Department of Transportation, "Manual of Highways Hydraulics," except hydrologic
analysis as described in item 14.
7. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Materials Laboratory Outline."
8. Transportation Research Board, "Highway Capacity Manual."
9. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, "Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices for Streets and Highways."
10. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Construction Manual."
11. Washington State Department of Transportation, "Local Agency Guidelines."
12. Standard drawings prepared by the City and furnished to the Consultant shall be used as a guide in all
cases where they fit design conditions. Renton Design Standards, and Renton Specifications shall be
used as they pertain.
13. Metro Transit, design criteria.
14. King County Surface Water Design Manual, Sections 1.2 and 1.3 of Chapter 1, and Chapters 3, 4,
and 5.
15. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets."
III
ITEMS TO BE FURNISHED TO THE CONSULTANT
BY THE CITY
The City will furnish the Consultant copies of documents which are available to the City that will facilitate the
preparation of the plans, studies, specifications, and estimates within the limits of the assigned work.
All other records needed for the study must be obtained by the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with
other available sources to obtain data or records available to those agencies. The Consultant shall be responsible for
this and any other data collection to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. City will provide to Consultant
all data in City's possession relating to Consultants services on the project. Consultant will reasonably rely upon the
accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of the information provided by the City. Should field studies be needed, the
Consultant will perform such work to the extent provided for in the Scope of Work. The City will not be obligated
to perform any such field studies.
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GolderContract2005\2005GolderContract.doc\ c 2 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts
/2000_Consultant.doc bh
ENGINEERING
ANNUAL CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this , day of , 2005, by and between the CITi
OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION HEREINAFTER CALLED THE "CITY," and
Golder Associates, Inc. whose address is 18300 NE Union Hill Rd, Ste 200, Redmond, WA 98052, at which work
will be available for inspection, hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT."
PROJECT NAME: 2005 Cedar River Section 205 Project Monitoring
WHEREAS, the City has not sufficient qualified engineering employees to provide the engineering within a
reasonable time and the City deems it advisable and is desirous of engaging the professional services and assistance
of a qualified professional consulting firm to do the necessary engineering work for the project, and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has represented and by entering into this Agreement now represents, that it is in full
compliance with the statutes of the State of Washington for registration of professional engineers, has a current valid
corporate certificate from the State of Washington or has a valid assumed name filing with the Secretary of State and
that all personnel to be assigned to the work required under this Agreement are fully qualified to perform the work to
which they will be assigned in a competent and professional manner, and that sufficient qualified personnel are on
staff or readily available to Consultant to staff this Agreement.
WHEREAS, the Consultant has indicated that it desires to do the work set forth in the Agreement upon the terms
and conditions set forth below.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performances contained herein below,
the parties hereto agree as follows:
I
SCOPE OF WORK
The Consultant shall furnish, and hereby warrants that it has, the necessary equipment, materials, and professionally
trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A, Scope of Work,
which is attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.
The Consultant shall perform all work described in this Agreement in accordance with the latest edition and
amendments to local and state regulations, guidelines and policies.
The Consultant shall prepare such information and studies as it may deem pertinent and necessary, in order to pass
judgment in a sound engineering manner on the features of the work. The Consultant shall make such minor
changes, amendments or revisions in the detail of the work as may be required by the City. This item does not
constitute an "Extra Work" item as related in Section VIII of the Agreement.
The work shall be verified for accuracy by a complete check by the Consultant. The Consultant will be held
responsible for the accuracy of the work, even though the work has been accepted by the City.
II
DESIGN CRITERIA
The City will designate the basic premises and criteria for the work needed. Reports and plans, to the extent
feasible, shall be developed in accordance with the latest edition and amendments of local and State regulations,
guidelines, and specifications, including, but not limited to the following:
HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GoiderContract2005\2005GolderContract.doc\ c 1 Piazza/Data—Center/Forms/City/Contracts
/2000_Consultant.doc bh
Golder/2005 Cedar River
February 11, 2005
Page 3 of 3
TABLE 2
2005 MONITORING ACTIVITIES - TASKS AND OBJECTIVES
Monitoring
Description
Task and Objective
Activity
(Per Table 1)
1
Vegetation
Monitor installed riparian vegetation along the river and
at mitigation sites to determine if the goals have been
met.
4
Proposed Side-
Monitor the spawning activity and rearing activity within
Channel
the proposed side -channel (that will replace the 205
Groundwater Channel) to determine if spawning goals
have been met and salmonids other than sockeye are
utilizing the channel.
5
Cedar River
Monitor the number of sockeye and redds (i.e. egg nests)
Spawning
in the Cedar River between Lake Washington and I-405
to determine if the lower river escapement goal has been
met.
9
Landsburg
Monitor the river channel below the Landsburg bridge to
Physical Surveys
determine if supplanted spawning gravel was transported
downstream.
10
Elliott Side-
Monitor the spawning activity and rearing activity within
Channel Rearing
the proposed side -channel (that will replace the 205
Groundwater Channel) to determine if spawning goals
have been met and salmonids other than sockeye are
utilizing the channel.
cc: Lys Hornsby, Utility Systems Director
HAFile Sys\SWP -Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 -Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 -
Monitoring\10.01 -Scope of Work\GolderContract2005\2005GolderIssuePaper.doc\CMtp
Golder/2005 Cedar River
February 11, 2005
Page 2 of 3
verification of predicted project impacts and mitigation benefits on key species (i.e. sockeye and
Chinook salmon, longfin smelt, and etc.). The City is responsible to ensure that the plan is
successfully implemented on an annual basis.
The overall monitoring plan (associated with the 1998 dredging and related mitigation projects)
consists of ten activities as shown in Table 1. Currently, seven of the ten activities have been
completed. It is important to note that the extension of certain monitoring activities (i.e. spawner
surveys in lower river and side -channels) beyond the permit condition is recommended. The
additional spawner surveys will be very useful to determine the actual long-term impacts of
dredging on target species and the overall benefits of the mitigation elements, which may help to
prevent the need for future mitigation.
A list and brief description of the monitoring activities included in the 2005 Monitoring Plan are
shown in Table 2. The scope of work, cost estimate, and schedule for the 2005 Monitoring Plan
is also attached.
CONCLUSION:
The Surface Water Utility recommends approval of the consultant agreement with Golder
Associates, Inc., to implement the 2005 Monitoring Plan for the Cedar River Section 205 Flood
Damage Reduction Project. The Surface Water Utility has funding sufficient to support
implementation of the 2005 Monitoring Plan in the 2005 Capital Improvement Program budget.
TABLE 1
2005 MONITORING PLAN ACTIVITIES - STATUS
Monitoring
Activity
Description
Actual
Start
Date
Estimated
or Actual
End Date
Completed?
1
Vegetation
1998
2005
No
2
Bird Use
1999
2000
Yes
3
Salmonid Use of Maplewood Revetment
1999
2000
Yes
4
Replacement Side -Channel
2005
2010
No
5
Cedar River Spawning
1998
2002
No
6
Salmonid Predation
1999
2000
Yes
7
Longfin Smelt
1999
2002
Yes
8
Scour Chains
1998
2000
Yes
9
Landsburg Gravel Supplementation
2000
2010
No
10
Elliott -Side Channel
2000
2003
No
* Requirements have been completed, but the City is still monitoring these activities.
HAFile Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 -
Monitoring\10.01 -Scope of Work\GolderContract2005\2005GoiderlssuePaper.doc\CMtp
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 11, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of Renton City Council
VIA: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Wheeler
FROM: Gregg Zimermak mdministrator
STAFF CONTACT: Ron Straka, Surface Water Supervisor (ext. 7248)
Chris Munter, Surface Water Engineer (ext. 7205)
SUBJECT: Engineering Consultant Agreement for 2005 Cedar River
Monitoring Plan
ISSUE:
The Surface Water Utility is required to implement the 2005 Monitoring Plan for the USACE
Cedar River Section 205 Flood Damage Reduction project per the Hydraulic Project Approval
issued by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife.
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute this agreement with Golder Associates, Inc., in
the amount of $99,396.12, to assist with the implementation of the 2005 Monitoring Plan for the
USACE Cedar River Section 205 Flood Damage Reduction project. Project funding ($305,000)
is appropriated in the Lower Cedar River Sediment Management Program account in the
approved 2005 Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program budget
(421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065095). Golder Associates, Inc., is included on the 2005 Utility
Systems Annual Consultant Roster and, in addition, conducted the required monitoring as part of
the 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 plans.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
As part of the permit conditions associated with the USACE Cedar River Section 205 Flood
Damage Reduction Project, the City and USACE developed a detailed post -construction
monitoring plan. Implementation of the plan, which is also a permit condition, will afford field
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.
Staff Contact.....
PBPW/Utility Systems
Ron Straka, x7248
Chris Munter, x7205
Fill
For Agenda of.
February 28, 2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Subject: Public Hearing..
Consultant Agreement to Implement the 2005 Correspondence..
Monitoring Plan for the Cedar River Section 205 Flood Ordinance .............
Damage Reduction Project Resolution............
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
Contract
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information.........
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Council Concur Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept...... X
Other. .....
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... $99,396.12 Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... $99,396.12 Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget $305,000 City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
As part of the necessary permit conditions for the Cedar River Section 205 Flood Damage Reduction
Project, the City and USACE developed a detailed biological and physical monitoring plan.
Implementation of the plan, which is also a permit condition, will afford field verification of
predicted project impacts and mitigation benefits on key species (i.e. sockeye and Chinook salmon,
longfin smelt, and etc.). The City is responsible to ensure that the plan is successfully implemented
each year until completion. The 2005 monitoring work includes surveys of adult spawning in the
lower Cedar River and constructed spawning channels, vegetation surveys, fry production in the
Elliott Spawning Channel, and physical surveys at the Landsburg Gravel Supplementation mitigation
site.
Project funding ($305,000) is appropriated in the Lower Cedar River Sediment Management Program
account in the approved 2005 Surface Water Utility Capital Improvement Program budget
(421.000600.018.5960.0038.65.065095). Golder Associates, Inc., is included on the 2005 Utility
Systems Annual Consultant Roster and, in addition, conducted the required monitoring as part of the
2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 plans.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute this agreement with Golder Associates, Inc., in the
amount of $99,396.12, which is already budgeted in the Project Funding ($305,000), to assist with
the implementation of the 2005 Monitoring Plan for the USACE Cedar River Section 205 Flood
Damage Reduction project.
H:\File Sys\SWP - Surface Water Projects\SWP-27 - Surface Water Projects (CIP)\27-2817 Cedar River Section 205 Project\10.0 - Monitoring\10.01 -
Scope of Work\GolderContract2005\2005GolderAgendaBill.doc\CMtp
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
ADMINISTRATIVE, JUDICIAL, AND LEGAL
SERVICES DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
February 14, 2005
Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Council
_�C- , Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
Jay Covington, Chief Administrative Officer
STAFF CONTACT: Joe McGuire, Court Services Director (x6531) i
'�
SUBJECT: New Hire above C Step
ISSUE:
Hiring Probation Officer at D step
RECOMMENDATION:
Council Concur with the Request and grant hiring at the D step.
BACKGROUND SUMMARY:
The Probation Officer position is now vacant. This position requires an employee with a high
level of skill, judgment and experience to perform this function for the City. The candidate
has six years experience as a Probation Officer and is currently employed as a Probation
Officer at the City of Kent. She is earning pay equal to the D step.
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board.
Staff Contact.....
Subject:
AJLS/Municipal Court
Joe McGuire, X6531
Hiring a Probation Officer at Step D
Exhibits:
Issue Paper
AI #: r
For Agenda of: 2/28/05
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Refer to Finance Committee Finance Dept......
Other........ ....
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... None Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Budgeted at D Step Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
X
SUMMARY OF ACTION: The Probation Officer position is now vacant. This position requires an
employee with a high level of skill, judgment and experience to perform this function for the
City. The candidate has six years experience as a Probation Officer and is currently employed
as a Probation Officer at the City of Kent. She is earning pay equal to the D step.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Council Concur in the request and grant the D step.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
ORDINANCE NO.
If any provision of this Chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances
is held invalid, the remainder of this Chapter and the application of such provisions to other
persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
SECTION IL There is hereby declared an emergency and this ordinance shall
take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1167:2/10/05:ma
day of 72005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
day of 2005.
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
I
-r, i;• j}t
ORDINANCE NO.
unless such owner in the transfer of such vehicle or vehicle hulk has complied with section
46.12.101 RCW and shall constitute a lien thereon.
C. Impoundment After Posted Notice: It shall be the duty of the Chief of Police to
remove any abandoned vehicle or vehicle hulk, parked or left on any street, highway or City
property as hereinabove defined after notice of removal, indicating his or her authority to
impound, has been posted on the vehicle or vehicle hulk for a period of not less than twenty four
(24) hours, and no claim has been made by the owner, or on his behalf, during the twenty four
(24) hour posting period. Such vehicle or vehicle hulk shall be removed by any tow truck
operator or as the City may otherwise determine, and in case of a tow truck operator, such
abandoned vehicle or vehicle hulk shall be stored at the established place of business of such
operator and he shall have a lien upon such vehicle or vehicle hulk for all services provided in
the towing and storage of the same, and shall also have a claim against the last registered owner
of such vehicle or vehicle hulk for services provided in the towing and storage of the same. See
also Renton Municipal Code Section 10-5-2.
D. Charge on Violation: The removal or impound of a vehicle from any street,
highway or property shall not preclude charging the violator with any violation of the law on
account of which such vehicle was impounded.
E. Reporting Procedure: The tow truck operator, or if none, the Chief of Police, shall
complete the required reporting and/or notifications as provided in section 46.90.345 RCW.
F. Disposition and Sale: Disposition and sale of an abandoned vehicle or vehicle
hulk shall be as provided in RCW 46.55.120(4), RCW 46.55.130 or RCW 46.90.375.
6-1-5 SEVERABILITY:
7
t
ORDINANCE NO.
licensed dismantler or licensed vehicle dealer and is fenced according to RCW 46.80.130, or 3) a
vehicle or part thereof which is stored or parked in a lawful manner on private real property in an
area zoned for and in connection with the business of a licensed auto body repair shop or facility.
I. Removal by Landowner: Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent any
landowner or the person in control of real property, except City property, from immediately
removing a vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof, which was left on such property without
the landowner's permission, irrespective of any time limits specified elsewhere in this Chapter,
by means of towing or otherwise, to a garage designated by the Police Department; provided,
that the Police Department shall be notified one hour prior to the removal of such a vehicle,
vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof.
J. Penalties: Any person violating RMC 6-1-2.A shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Penalties for any violations of any of the provisions of this Section shall be in accord with RMC
1-3-1.
6-1-4 ABANDONMENT OF VEHICLE OR VEHICLE HULKS ON STREETS, HIGHWAYS
OR CITY PROPERTY REGULATED:
A. Abandonment of Vehicle or Vehicle Hulks on Streets, Highways or City Property
Prohibited: No person shall abandon any vehicle or vehicle hulk as hereinabove defined on any
street, highway or City property. Any such vehicle or vehicle hulk is hereby declared to be a
public nuisance which shall be removed in accordance with this Chapter.
B. Presumption of Responsibility of Owner of Record for Abandonment: Any costs
incurred in the removal of such vehicle or vehicle hulk may be assessed against the last
registered owner of the vehicle or vehicle hulk if the identity of such owner can be determined,
T,
ORDINANCE NO.
on the King County tax assessment roll and to the last registered owner and legal owner of
record of such vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof, unless the vehicle is in such condition
that identification numbers are not available to determine ownership.
F. Testimony: The applicant for hearing may either appear in person at such hearing
or present a written statement in time for consideration at the hearing and deny responsibility for
the presence of the vehicle on the land, with his or her reasons for such denial. If it is
determined at the hearing that the vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof was placed on the
land without the consent of the landowner, and that the landowner has not subsequently
acquiesced in its presence, then the Hearing Examiner shall not assess costs of administration or
removal of the vehicle, vehicle hulk or any parts thereof against the landowner of the real
property upon which the vehicle, vehicle hulk or any parts thereof is located or otherwise attempt
to collect such costs from the landowner.
G. Disposal: After notice has been given by the Police Chief of the City or his or her
designee, of the intent of the City to abate the vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof, and no
request for a hearing is received, or a hearing is held and the Hearing Examiner orders the
vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof removed, the said vehicle, vehicle hulk or parts thereof
shall be removed from private real property by the Police Chief or his or her designee and
disposed of to a licensed auto wrecker with notice to the Washington State Patrol and the State of
Washington Department of Licenses.
H. Exceptions: This Chapter shall not apply to: 1) a vehicle or part thereof which is
completely enclosed within a building in a lawful manner where it is not visible from the street
or other public or private real property, or 2) a vehicle or part thereof which is stored or parked in
a lawful manner on private real property zoned for and in connection with the business of a
L"
ORDINANCE NO.
the City may be first assessed against the last registered owner of the vehicle, vehicle hulk, or
any parts thereof, if the identity of such owner can be determined, unless such vehicle owner in
the transfer of the ownership of such vehicle or vehicle hulk has complied with RCW 46,12.101,
or second, the costs may be assessed against the landowner on which such vehicle, vehicle hulk,
or any parts thereof is stored, provided that said vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof, is
stored, maintained, kept or retained with the landowner's permission or acquiescence and shall
constitute a lien thereon.
D. Notice: Before the abatement or removal of a junk, wrecked, dismantled or an
apparently inoperable vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof, notice shall be given by the
Police Chief or his or her designee to the last registered vehicle owner and legal vehicle owner of
record, if the identity of such owner can be lawfully determined, and the landowner of real
property upon which such vehicle or vehicle hulk or any parts thereof is located, that a public
hearing may be requested before the Hearing Examiner of the City, by mailing a copy of the
notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the last known address of the vehicle's last
registered and legal owner and landowner of real property on which the vehicle, vehicle hulk or
any parts is located, or by personal service upon said owners, and if no hearing is requested
within twenty-one (21) days from the date of mailing or personal service, the vehicle, vehicle
hulk or any parts thereof may be removed and abated in accordance with this Chapter and RMC
1-3-3.G.
E. Request for Hearing: If a request for hearing is received by the Hearing Examiner,
a notice giving the time, location and date of such hearing on the question of the abatement and
removal of such vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof, as a public nuisance shall be mailed
by certified mail with a return receipt requested, to the landowner of the real property as shown
0
ORDINANCE NO.
MAINTAIN or MAINTENANCE: To hold or keep in an existing state or condition,
or keep in existence or continuance.
RETAIN or RETENTION: To continue to hold, have, keep, own, possess, or to
exercise dominion or exercise control over.
STORE or STORAGE: To place, accumulate, or leave in a location.
VEHICLE: RCW 46.04.670 is hereby adopted by reference, as now or hereafter
amended, as if fully set forth herein, and shall apply to the interpretation and enforcement of this
Chapter.
VEHICLE HULK: Any part or portion of the body or chassis of a vehicle that is
apparently inoperable or unable to be lawfully operated upon public roads or highways.
WRECKED: A vehicle or vehicle hulk, or any part thereof that is disabled, destroyed,
apparently inoperable, or extensively damaged.
6-1-3: JUNK VEHICLE OR VEHICLE HULKS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY REGULATED:
A. It shall be unlawful to store, maintain, keep or retain: a junk, wrecked, dismantled
or an apparently inoperable vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any part thereof, on private real property in
the City of Renton.
B. The storage, maintenance or retention of junk, wrecked, dismantled or an
apparently inoperable vehicle, vehicle hulk, or any parts thereof, on private real property in the
City is hereby declared to be a public nuisance in accordance with this Chapter and RMC 1-3-4,
as now or hereafter amended, and may be abated in accordance with this Chapter and RMC 1-3-
3 . G, as now or hereafter amended.
C. Abatement Costs: Costs of abatement and removal of junk, wrecked, dismantled
or an apparently inoperable vehicle, vehicle hulk, or parts thereof, from private real property in
3
ORDINANCE NO.
The purpose of this chapter is to preserve the health, safety, welfare, and character of the
City's neighborhoods and to reduce blight by eliminating as nuisances, junk vehicles from
private property, and to provide procedures for the removal of junk vehicles as authorized by
RCW 46.55.240 and RMC 1-3-3.G, as now or hereafter amended. It is a further purpose of this
chapter to provide a procedure for handling the abandonment of vehicles or vehicle hulks from
public property.
6-1-2 DEFINITIONS:
DISMANTLED: A vehicle that is in parts or pieces such that it is apparently
inoperable or unable to be lawfully operated upon public roads or highways.
INOPERABLE: A vehicle that is apparently not functioning or is inoperative or
cannot be lawfully operated upon public roads or highways.
JUNK VEHICLE: A vehicle that meets at least three of the following requirements: (1)
a vehicle that is three years old or older; (2) a vehicle that is extensively damaged, such damage
including but not limited to any of the following: a broken window or windshield, or missing
wheels, tires, motor, or transmission; (3) a vehicle that is apparently inoperable; (4) a vehicle that
has an approximate fair market value equal only to the approximate value of the scrap in the
vehicle's current condition, or (5) evidence of inoperability or damage that includes, but is not
limited to any buildup of debris that obstructs use, or a flat or missing tire or tires, or a
nonfunctional motor or transmission, or missing bumpers, or missing license plates, or expired
vehicle license plate tabs.
LANDOWNER: A legal owner or owners of private real property, or a person in
possession or control of private real property.
2
f
L � F <, I u
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 6-1, ABANDONED VEHICLES, OF TITLE VI
(POLICE REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260 ENTITLED
"CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON" BY OUTLAWING JUNK VEHICLES ON PRIVATE
REAL PROPERTY, REVISING ABATEMENT PROCEDURES, ADDING
DEFINITIONS, DECLARING CERTAIN VIOLATIONS A
MISDEMEANOR, ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE FOR HANDLING
THE ABANDONMENT OF VEHICLES OR JUNK VEHICLES FROM
PUBLIC PROPERTY, AND PROVIDING A STATEMENT OF
LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Chapter 6-1, Abandoned Vehicles, of Title VI (Police Regulations)
of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton,
Washington" is hereby amended to read as follows:
CHAPTER 1
JUNK VEHICLES OR ABANDONMENT OF VEHICLES
SECTION:
6-1-1: Purpose
6-1-2: Definitions
6-1-3: Junk Vehicle Or Vehicle Hulks On Private Property Regulated
6-1-4: Abandonment of Vehicle Or Vehicle Hulks On Streets, Highways Or City
Property Regulated
6-1-5: Severability
6-1-1: PURPOSE:
I
Mayor and City Council
Amendments to City Code re: junk vehicles/abandonment of vehicles
Page - 2
Finally, violations of the junk vehicle portion of this chapter were made infractions. However,
under state law, the City could not obtain a search warrant to go on private property to establish
a violation of the Code. State court decisions allowed search warrants of private property only
upon the showing of criminal probable cause that a violation was being committed. By
criminalizing the Code, the City may obtain a search warrant and go upon private property. It
is frequently necessary to get a search warrant to clearly establish all of the elements of a "junk
vehicle."
There is only one change in the chapter with respect to abandonment of vehicles. State law
defines "abandoned vehicles" in a manner that relates only to vehicles not claimed from tow
yards. Therefore, we have changed the title of the chapter, and the appropriate subsection, to
"abandonment of vehicles" to avoid the state definition of "abandoned vehicles." The Code
section has worked well for the police department over a number of years, but while the Code
was being amended, this wording change was made to avoid any potential difficulties.
R
CITY OF RENTON
.,u Office of the City Attorney
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor Lawrence J. Warren
Assistant City Attorneys
Mark Barber
Zanetta L. Fontes
Ann S. Nielsen
MEMORANDUM Sasha P. Alessi
Whitney A. Faulkner
DATE: February 11, 2005
TO: Terri Briere, Council President
Members of the Renton City Counci
VIA: Mayor Kathy Keolker-Whee
FROM: Vtlawrence I Warren, City Attorney
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Barber, Assistant City Attorney
Ann Nielsen, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Amendments to the City Code dealing with Junk Vehicles or
Abandonment of Vehicles
ISS E:
Should Chapter 1 of Title VI of City Code be amended to include definitions, clarify sections,
expand the scope to include parts of junk vehicles, and criminalize portions of the Code?
RECOMMENDATION:
Review, comment, and recommend passage of the proposed ordinance to the full City Council.
BACKGROUND:
With the current emphasis on nuisance abatement, the City Attorney's office has taken a close
look at several portions of the City Code, including the code section on junk vehicles or
abandonment of vehicles. Both junk vehicles and abandonment of vehicles are covered by
state law delegating the authority to the city to regulate junk vehicles or abandonment of
vehicles. Some of the definitions in state law have changed since the original adoption of this
Code section, and so, it is necessary to update City Code. Additionally, the state law has certain
inconsistencies that are resolved by including more properly worded definitions and
explanations in City Code.
The prior City Code did not explicitly state that violation of its terms would be unlawful. That
lack presented a potential defense to charges brought by the City and so a section was added to
resolve this difficulty.
Post Office Box 626 -Renton, Washington 98057 - (425) 255-8678 / FAX (425) 255-5474
® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 30 % past consumer
RENTON
AHEAD OF THE CURVE
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
Submitting Data:
Dept/Div/Board..
Staff Contact......
City Attorney's office
Lawrence J. Warren
Subject:
Amendments to Chapter 6-1 titled "Junk Vehicles or
Abandonment of Vehicles"
Exhibits:
Ordinance
•
For Agenda of February 28, 2005
Agenda Status
Consent ..............
Public Hearing..
Correspondence..
Ordinance .............
Resolution ............
Old Business........
New Business.......
Study Sessions.....,
Information........ .
X
//
Recommended Action: Approvals:
Refer to Public Safety Committee Legal Dept......... X
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact: None
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Chapter 6.1 is updated to add definitions, expand the scope of junk
vehicles to include parts thereof, add explanatory language and criminalize violations
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve an amendment to the Renton Municipal Code, Title VI,
Chapter 1, regarding junk vehicles and abandonment of vehicles.
Rentonnet/agnbill/ bh
CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AIN:
Submitting Data:
For Agenda of:
Dept/Div/Board.. EDNSP
February 28, 2005
Staff Contact...... Alex Pietsch (x6592)
Agenda Status
Consent .............. X
Public Hearing..
Subject:
Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
Correspondence..
Appointment
Ordinance .............
Resolution........... .
Old Business........
New Business.......
Exhibits:
Study Sessions......
Information........ .
Recommended Action:
Council Concur
Approvals:
Legal Dept.........
Finance Dept......
Other ...............
Fiscal Impact:
Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.......
Amount Budgeted....... Revenue Generated.........
Total Project Budget City Share Total Project..
SUMMARY OF ACTION:
Resolution #3288 established the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee and authorizes
Council to review the membership annually and fill any committee vacancies. Resolution #3686
established that two representatives from the lodging industry be represented on the Committee.
Terry Godat, of the EconoLodge has resigned. Kim Hart, general manager of the TownePlace
Suites and SpringHill Suites by Marriott has been nominated by the Renton Visitors Connection
to replace this vacant seat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Renton City Council appoint Kim Hart to the Renton Lodging Tax Advisory Committee.
H:\EDNSP\Economic Development\Hotel-Motel Tax\Council Action - Agenda Bills and Issue Papers\2005\Committe Vacancy agbill - Hart.doc
City of Renton - -J
oney CreekFEas_ t t NVCASTLE
Current Annexations 27.5 ac.
URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY -
GfI'YWAITS .,- , �.. t..•, Merritt II
ACTNE ANNEXATION f- /�(
INACTIVE ANNEXATION t - 133.3 ac.
t EHendrickson
. A
conamk Devebprtwnt. Neipf,twAwods 8 Btrsteglc Planning ' t
♦ AMPieYCA.
° ,Rr D..e.,zoa 'Approved by the B.R.B. 23.1 ac. T-` .t� � i ":
Wedgewood
Querin t,
' I Lane
T i
}k
sx9.4 ac. �_
'.A Y 38.9 ac.
Anderson
s
19.8 ac.
Maplewood
Park Terrace � p
r , ta; East
7.6 ac.
x T , fYI 26.1 ac.
e� �, . s�
Lindberg H �.�;,._
10.6 ac.
I
Mosier 11Y4 Y
„ 31.0 ac. .•,
' `-�Y ` Maplewood
I ' Maplewood � Highlands
Maplewood,,.,, g
Addition9.5 ac.
TUKWiI ,''`i I .. 60.5 ac. lementary h-r
1 i .ih =y
' E )1J111 Falk I I 9.8 ac.
4.
------ 6.8 ac.;"Z
i
Ant hone'
�- 4.9 ac.
KENT !. j k 4• t i i {,.�, ,
I
FEB 42005
E
King County�� (�`NNI7JG
Department of Assessments Scott'NO'W-' -
King County Administration Bldg, Assessor
500 Fourth Avenue, Room 708
Seattle, WA 98104-2384
(206) 296-5195 FAX (206) 296-0595
Email: assessorinfo@metrokc.gov
www.metroke.gov/assessor/
ANNEXATION PETITION CERTIFICATION
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the petition submitted January 24, 2005 to
the King County Department of Assessments by Don Erickson,
Senior Planner for the City of Renton, supporting the annexation to
Renton of the properties described as the Wedgewood Lane
Annexation (Revised), has been examined, the property taxpayers,
tax parcel numbers, and assessed value of properties listed thereon
carefully compared with the King County tax roll records, and as a
result of such examination, found to be sufficient under the
provisions of the New Section of Revised Code of Washington,
Section 35.13.002.
The Department of Assessments has not verified that the signature
on the petition is valid through comparison with any record of actual
signatures, nor that the signature was obtained or submitted in an
appropriate time frame, and this document does not certify such to
be the case.
Dated this 3rd day of February, 2005
Scott Noble, King County Assessor
A •®1MM
AM181 r 2,
WEDGEWOOD LANE ANNEXATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the east half (1/2) of the Northeast quarter of Section 10, Township 23
North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, lying south of the south line of
the north 20 acres thereof, and lying north of the south line of the north 50 acres thereof;
LESS the east 30 feet thereof for County Road (148t' Avenue SE);
TOGETHER WITH Lot C of King County Boundary Line Adjustment No. L041,0055, as
recorded in Volume 180 of Surveys, Pages 222 and 223, under King County Recording
No. 20041223 90000 1, in the east half (1/2) of said Section 10.
Exhibit 1
o�aQci 1t
❑ �o ❑ o 0
--_ _ 1 a o r Q Q w
� ❑ � o Q 13
t� 7
P Lri lJ LJ ❑
3
1� h
Q
_ 6
C� ❑ D o
Q q >
a n
co T
cl Ln
L9 ID
O
Q ❑
P ❑ D
a
W I ❑ �}
a �
o �a
as
------------
o D
o � a
o �
9 a ThL Ooament k �phk reprcsentatkn, nat quarantesd
[] to twre occurocy. intended /w dt oNY —
O based on the best F/ormotion w Y os of Ne dota shown•
This nrtq IS Mr displOY purposes M:Y.
Wedgewood Lane Annexation 0 400 goo
'igure 3: Existing Structure Map
1 : 4800
ti�Y O� Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Existing SWdure
Alex Pietsch, Administrator
G. Del Rosario Note., Annexation boundary may differ from diagram. Renton City Limits
�Nzo 8 October 2004 Please see legal descWbon for actual boundary, 0 Proposed Annexation Area
r '
�VW
TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE
Date
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
Bruce Leven Lease Addendum 07-05
(Referred February 7, 2005)
The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff
recommendation to approve Lease Addendum 07-05 to LAG-001-88 with Bruce Leven to X
decrease>(the leased area to eliminate 2,578 square feet because of the 1999 Cedar River
Floodwall and Levy Project and 934 square feet because of the 2002 Airport Airside/Landside
Separation Improvement Project, resulting in an annual reduction in revenue of $715.81 and a
one-time credit of $2,173.17.
The Committee further recommends that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign the
lease agreement.
0 _ (, e��L
Marcie Palmer, Chair
Don Persson, Vice -Chair
andy Corman, Member
cc: Connie Brundage
Susan Campbell-Hehr
Kathie Nye
TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE Date a'2?
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
I-405 Mainline Alignment — Renton Western City Limit to SR 169 Concurrence Letter
(Referred February 14, 2005)
The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff
recommendation to authorize the Mayor to provide a concurrence signature to the Washington
State Department of Transportation regarding the I-405 mainline alignment from the western
Renton city limit to SR 169.
The concurrence concept for the I-405 project was established in the I-405 Corridor Program
Final EIS as a method of formal written determination on key issues by agencies so the I 405
program may proceed to the next phase. The Council, on several I-405 key issues, has
provided concurrence since 1999.
Concurrence regarding the I-405 mainline alignment allows the Renton Nickel Project to
progress without unintentionally constraining future I-405 projects.
�/ w;L l
Marcie Palmer, Chair
Don Persson, Vice -Chair
111�1 (r",
R ndy Corman, Member
cc: Gregg Zimmerman, Administrator
Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director
Nick Afzali, Transportation Systems Planning and Programming Manager
Connie Brundage, Transportation Systems Administrative Secretary
1-405 Mainline Alignment Committee Report.doc\ rev 01/04 bh
TRANSPORTATION/AVIATION COMMITTEE Date
COMMITTEE REPORT
February 28, 2005
I-405/SR 167 Interchange 5% Design Concurrence Letter
(Referred February 14, 2005)
The Transportation/Aviation Committee recommends concurrence in the staff
recommendation to authorize the Mayor to provide a concurrence signature to the Washington
State Department of Transportation regarding the I-405/SR 167 Interchange 5% Design.
The concurrence concept for the I-405 project was established in the 1-405 Corridor Program
Final EIS as a method of formal written determination on key issues by agencies so the I-405
program may proceed to the next phase. The Council, on several I-405 key issues, has
provided concurrence since 1999.
Concurrence regarding the I-405/SR 167 interchange 5% design allows the Renton Nickel
Project to progress without unintentionally constraining future I-405 projects.
Marcie P er, Chair
Don Persson, Vice -Chair
Rdndy Corman, Member
cc: Gregg Zimmerman, PB/PW Administrator
Sandra Meyer, Transportation Systems Director
Nick Afzali. Transportation Systems Planning and Programming Manager
Connie Brundage, Transportation Systems Administrative Secretary
HATRANSWDMI'MAGENDA 2005 1-405 SR 167 Interchange 5% Committee Report
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. Sl o?S
aoos C�
J64W//6.
Est 4 a AW
a. �-aoos
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING CHAPTER 11, DEFINITIONS, OF TITLE IV
(DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260
ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
RENTON, WASHINGTON" BY REVISING THE DEFINITIONS OF
"MEDICAL INSITUTIONS" AND "CONVALESCENT CENTERS," AND
ADDING A DEFINITION FOR "HOLISTIC HEALTH CENTERS."
WHEREAS, the City of Renton includes definitions of different categories of land use
within its development regulations; and
WHEREAS, the City from time to time refines these definitions to facilitate better
review of land use applications; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined, after consideration of the testimony and
evidence before it, that specific definitions require amendment or inclusion in order to provide
adequate direction for interpretation of land use regulations;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. Section 4-11-030 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) is hereby amended by revising the definition of Convalescent
Centers, to read as follows:
CONVALESCENT CENTERS: Facilities for patients who are recovering health and
strength after illness or injury, or receiving long-term care for chronic conditions, disabilities, or
terminal illnesses where care includes ongoing medical treatment and extended care facilities.
This definition does not include retirement residences, adult family homes, group homes II,
medical institutions, and/or secure community transition facilities.
1
ORDINANCE NO.
SECTION II. Section 4-11-080, of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) is hereby amended by adding a definition for Holistic Health Care
Center, to read as follows:
HOLISTIC HEALTH CARE CENTER: A combination of activities intended for
improvement or maintenance of health including out -patient and/or in -patient care and
supporting accessory activities including space for medical practitioners, retail sales, educational
classrooms and meeting spaces.
SECTION III.
Section 4-11-130 of Chapter 11, Definitions, of Title IV
(Development Regulations) is hereby amended by revising the definition of Medical Institutions,
to read as follows.
MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS: Facilities providing physical or mental health services, in-
patient accommodations, and medical or surgical care of the sick or injured. This definition
includes hospitals, clinics, hospice, and holistic health centers. This definition excludes medical
and dental offices, convalescent centers, retirement residences, and group homes II and I.
SECTION IV. This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
five days after its publication.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
Bonnie I. Walton, City Clerk
2
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 2005.
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD.I 171:2/25/05:ma
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
3
a-ay-aoos
CITY OF RENTON, WASHCNGTON
ORDINANCE NO. .S/o2 6
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, ADDING
SECTION 5-1-2.K TO CHAPTER 1, FEE SCHEDULE, OF TITLE V,
(FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 4260
ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF
RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO ADOPT SERVICE FEES FOR SPECIAL
METER READINGS, NEW UTILITY ACCOUNT SETUP, AND UTILITY
ACCOUNT TRANSFERS.
WHEREAS, the City provides special request water meter readings to title and escrow
companies at the close of property sales in Renton, and the City processes new utility billing
accounts and transfers accounts; and
WHEREAS, the cost of creating new utility billing accounts and transferring accounts
should be paid by those requesting the information, and not by all rate payers; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that fees assessed in the following
amounts are reasonable fees, and these fees are based on the actual cost of providing these
special services: Thirty dollars ($30.00) for a special request water meter reading; twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) for a utility new account setup; and five dollars ($5.00) for a utility billing
account transfer;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L A new Section, 5-1-2.K, of Chapter 1, Fee Schedule, of Title V
(Finance and Business Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General
Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" is hereby added, to read as follows:
K. Utility Fees:
Special Request Water Meter Reading
$30.00
1
ORDINANCE NO.
Utility New Account Setup $25.00
Utility Billing Account Transfer $5.00
SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
30 days after publication, and the new fees will be charged beginning May 1, 2005.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this
APPROVED BY TBE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1163:2/7/05:ma
day of , 2005.
Bonnie 1. Walton, City Clerk
day of _ , 2005.
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
a-�� aoos
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. S/ 2`I
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING SECTION 5-1-2.K TO CHAPTER 1, FEE SCHEDULE, OF
TITLE V (FINANCE AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE
NO. 4260 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON" TO ADOPT SERVICE FEES FOR
UTILITY OUTSTANDING BALANCE SEARCHES.
WHEREAS, the City provides utility outstanding balances to title and escrow companies
at the close of property sales in Renton; and
WHEREAS, the cost of providing a water utility outstanding balance search should be
paid by those requesting the information, and not by all rate payers; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that fees assessed in the following
amounts are reasonable fees, and these fees are based on the actual cost of providing these
special services: Twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for an internet water utility balance search and
fifty dollars ($50.0) for a water utility outstanding balance search requested by fax, messenger
or letter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIC CITY OF RENTON,
WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION L Section 5-1-2.K, of Chapter 1, Fee Schedule, of Title V (Finance
and Business Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the
City of Renton, Washington" is hereby amended, to read as follows:
K. Utility Fees:
Special Request Water Meter Reading
Utility New Account Setup
$30.00
$25.00
1
ORDINANCE NO.
Utility Billing Account Transfer $5.00
Internet Water Utility Balance Search $25.00
�k Water Utility Outstanding Balance Search Requested By
Fax, Messenger or Letter $50.00
SECTION iL This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and
30 days after publication, and the new fees will be charged beginning May 1, 2005.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 2005.
APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this
Approved as to form:
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Date of Publication:
ORD. 1166:2/7/05:ma
Bonnie 1. Walton, City Clerk
day of , 2005.
Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Mayor
7, �
From: Julie Brewer
To: Council News
Date: 2/24/2005 10:54:43 AM
Subject: Fwd: Renton schools Good News
FYI - from the Renton School District - Julie
>>> "Randy Matheson" <randy.matheson @ renton.wednet.edu> 2/24/2005 9:14:17 AM >>>
Below are Renton School District good news announcements read by School
Board members at last night's meeting. Please feel free to use these in
conversations with your coworkers, friends and constituents.
Randy Matheson
Executive Director, Community Relations
Renton School District
425.204.2345
rmatheson@renton.wednet.edu
"GOOD NEWS" ANNOUNCEMENTS
February 23, 2005
* Nicole Parris, a senior at Lindbergh High School, has been named a finalist in the National Achievement
Scholarship Program, an academic competition providing recognition for outstanding black high school
students. Students enter the National Achievement Program by taking the Preliminary SAT/National Merit
Scholarship Qualifying Test and meeting other requirements for participation. Nicole was selected based
on her test scores and her abilities, skills and accomplishments. She is one of only 800 finalists
nationwide. '
✓ * Lori Dunn, physical ed and health teacher at Hazen High School, has been selected Northwest District
High School Teacher of the Year by the Association of the American Alliance of Health, Physical
Education, Recreation and Dance (AHPERD). Lori will receive her award next month during the
organization's annual convention. She will compete for AAHPERD's National Teacher of the Year honor.
* Five students in Lindbergh High School's Future Business Leaders of America program placed at a
recent region competition. The students now move on to compete at the state level:
Julian Reyes received a 1 st place in visual basics and a 3rd place in job interviewing
Winnie Kwan received 1st place in public speaking
Mark Henry received 2nd place in business communications
Jobren Jucal received 3rd place in marketing
* Dimmitt Middle School student Stephanie Hay recently competed for a chance to be named 2005 King
County Youth of the Year, a program sponsored by the Boys & Girls Club of America and the Reader's
Digest Foundation. The program recognizes teens for their academics, moral character, life goals, and
service to family and community. Although not selected, Stephanie was one of only 12 teens countywide
interviewed for the honor in a public presentation at Benaroya Hall.
* Hazen High School celebrated Black History Month with a culminating event featuring keynote speaker
Ron Ward, the first African American to be selected as president of the Washington State Bar
Association. The event also featured a celebration luncheon for students who completed training provided
by Sheila Houston, a Hazen parent and president of It's Your Choice Leadership Development & Training
Institute. Sheila has worked with Hazen for the past three years to develop positive life choices for African
American students.
* Dimmitt Middle School Principal Kathleen Heaton -Bailey recently testified in front of the state Senate
Committee on Early Learning, K-12 & Higher Education, urging full support for Joint Memorial 8011, a
resolution from the Washington state Senate to President Bush and the U.S. Congress, asking for full
funding and support to implement the No Child Left Behind Act. Kathleen's testimony included Dimmitt's
demographics as well as achievements and the progress the school is making toward meeting state and
federal goals outlined in the law. Senate Joint Memorial 8011 also asks the federal Department of
Education to improve language and regulations in the Act allowing Washington state to be able to comply
with its implementation.
* Two Lindbergh High School students, Kristi Slattery and Dennis Doan,will perform with professional
musicians as part of the Pontiac Bay Symphony Orchestra in two concerts featuring music from film,
theater, and television. The first concert, scheduled for Saturday, March 5 at 7:30 p.m. at Kane Hall, on
the University of Washington campus, will feature music from James Bond, Mission Impossible, Catch Me
If You Can, Peter Gunn and more. A second concert, featuring a tribute to the music in classic and
contemporary westerns, is scheduled for Saturday, June 11 at 7:30 p.m. Pontiac Bay Symphony
Orchestra is a blend of professional musicians, members of other orchestras, and private music teachers
all performing alongside young musicians, ages 12 to 18.