Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA83-065 OF R4 ,4 ® ; o THE CITY OF RENTON ®® ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0,9q��D SEPSE°�P October 1, 1982 Mr. Loren Davis Holvick deRegt Koering 1818 Westlake North Seattle, WA 98109 Re: Appeal of Holvick deRegt Koering SA-094-81, SA-095-81 and V-014-82 Dear Mr. Davis: The Renton City Council , at its regular meeting of September 20, 1982, considered the Planning and Development Committee report concerning your appeal . The City Council affirmed the July 16, 1982 decision of the Hearing Examiner and found no error in fact or law. The Council also determined not to consider any new evidence that could have been available at the time of the hearing before the Land Use Hearing Examiner. However, the Planning and Development Committee felt the requirement for installation of traffic signals prior to the issuance of the building permit pursuant to the site plan approval would not be feasible. The City Council concurred in the modification of Condition No. 2 of both site plans as follows: Condition No 2: Deferral of improvements with appropriate bond executions of contracts for installation of signals and issurance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and Southwest Seventh Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. Council has determined that, in order to obtain occupancy permit for this site, you must either obtain deferral of improvements with the appropriate bonding or have completed installation of signals pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. Mr. Loren Davis Holvick deRegt Koering October 1, 1982 Page 2 If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor Acting City Clerk MEM:j km ycf, � AMENDED PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT September 20, 1982 TO: '; Renton City Council FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: , Appeal by Holvick DeRegt Koering SA-094-81, SA-095-81 and V4114-82 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of Holvick DeRegt Koering from the decision of the Hearing Examiner in the above mentioned matter dated July 15 and 16, 1982. Finding no error in the requirement for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way, and Hardie and S.W. 7th Street, as a condition of the site plan approval, the Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner. The appellant has requested that the Committee consider additional traffic study evidence from appellant' s consultant . However, the Committee finds that the evidence could have been available at the hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon timely request by the appellant. Therefore, the Committee recommends that no new evidence be considered by the Council . However, it appears that the requirement for installation of traffic signals prior to issuance of the building permit pursuant to the site plan approval is not feasible. Therefore, the Committee recommends that Conditions No. 2 of both site plan approval decisions be modified to read as follows : No . 2. Deferral of improvements with appropriate bond, executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and S .W. 7th Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. .ar / - r < i)e ov 13,\,, A triji C'Y ' f , 'Renton City Council September 13, 1982 Page 3 AUDIENCE COMMENT continued Mandatory Ms. Taylor addressed the Council and reiterated her complaints Garbage Service as stated in her letter. Mayor Shinpoch explained that every continued bidder on the city's garbage contract submitted their estimates - based on all residences in the city and, in order to provide service to the citizens, all citizens must be included. M. L. Gibson, 1215 North 28th Place, agreed with Ms. Taylor's objections to mandatory garbage service and suggested unified demands by cities would require companies to submit "per residence" bids. Mayor Shinpoch explained reduced garbage rates and the addition of a one-can rate for those needing limited service. Holvick deReq_t Loren Davis, Holvick deRegt Koering, requested that the Planning Koering Appeal and Development Committee report be advanced. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SA 094-81 SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL SUSPEND THE REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS SA 095-81 AND ADVANCE TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. V Q 14-82 CARRIED. Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill submitted a committee report recommending Council affirm the Hearing Examiner decisions of July 15 and 16, 1982, regarding installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way, and Hardy and SW Seventh Street as a condition of the site plan approval . The Committee also recommended that no new evidence be considered by the Council since all evidence could have been available at the hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon timely request by the appellant. The Committee did recommend that Condition 2 of both site plan approval decisions regarding require- ment for installation of traffic signals prior to issuance of the building permit be modified as follows: No. 2 Executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for instal- lation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and SW Seventh Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT.** Councilman Reed questioned the lack of time restriction on actual installation of traffic lights. Following discussion, it was MOVED _DY R0CKHILL, S.ECaNDED_M_3EED_. _10 ACCEPT. THE AMENDMENT OFFERED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY TO WIT: FOLLOWING "NO. 2" - THE DEFERRAL OF IMPROVEMENTS WITH APPROPRIATE BONDING OR THE INSTALLATION OF SIGNALS WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT. CARRIED. **Original motion as amended: CARRIED. Garbage Pickup Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Avenue South, commended the present garbage Commendation/ collection firm for its fees, neatness, quietness and observation Mandatory Leash of traffic flow on Mill Avenue South. Mr. Webb also criticized Law Enforcement the enforcement of the mandatory leash law and suggested repeal of the leash law if it is not to be enforced. Councilman Stredicke requested the record reflect that there had been a death of the animal control officer, and recommended strengthening the manpower to more than the current one animal control officer for next year' s budget. Mayor Shinpoch left Council Chambers at 10:00 p.m. and did not return for remainder of meeting. Mandatory Leash Karen Lunder, 506 Stevens Court NW, agreed with all comments re- Law Enforcement garding lack of enforcement of the mandatory leash law and suggested additions to the animal control office to supply personnel for more than eight hours a day, weekdays only. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, SUBJECT MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPORT BACK BY BUDGET TIME. CARRIED. M ( ) l~ s PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT TO: Renton City Council August 27 , 1982 FROM: Planning and Development Committee RE: Appeal by Holvick DeRegt Koering SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and V41 14-82 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of Holvick DeRegt Koering from the decision of the Hearing Examiner in the above mentioned matter dated July. 15 and 16 , 1982 . Finding no error in the requirement for installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way, and Hardie and S .W. 7th Street , as a condition of the site plan approval , the Committee recommends that the City Council affirm the decisions of the Hearing Examiner. The appellant has requested that the Committee consider additional traffic study evidence from appellant ' s consultant. However, the Committee finds that the evidence could have been available at the hearing before the Hearing Examiner upon timely request by the appellant . Therefore, the Committee recommends that no new evidence be considered by the Council However, it appears that the requirement for installation of traffic signals prior to issuance of the building permit pursuant to the site plan approval is not feasible . Therefore, the Committee recommends that Conditions No. 2 of both site plan approval decisions be modified to read as follows : No . 2 . •Executions of contracts for installation of signals and issuance of a bond (in an amount and form approved by the City) to complete any uncompleted portion of such contracts for installation of traffic • signals at the intersection of Powell and Grady Way and Hardie and S.W. 7th Street pursuant to specifications established by the Public Works Department. 412 . / / �-4/ • r.UILDING AND 'ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE vEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JULY 13, 1982 APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING FILE NUMBER: SA-094-81 /t/ - 0/4- 82 A. StililiivA & PD"!''*SE +1Er The applicant seeks Site Plan approval for construction of four , (4) one-story buildings (12-15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing. Also sought is a Variance to permit joint access driveways on common property lines. B. GENERAL INFO rai+-i,\\TIO : 1 . Owner of Record: Holvick, deRegt & Koering 2. Applicant: Holvick, deRegt & Koering 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Southwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: +3. 36 acres. 6. Access : Via S.W. 7th Street & Powell Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: M-P, ManufacturingcPark. 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: M-P, Manufacturing Park. 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park. 10. Notification: The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on July 2, 1982, and posted in, three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on July 2, 1982. C. HISTORY/;: XG:,.S+WJD The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No. 1745 of April 14 , 1959, and rezoned from "G" to M-P by Ordinance No. 3344 of August 17, 1979. PRELIMINARY REP TO THE HEARING EXAMINER `', HOLVICK, deREGT _„ KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 • PAGE TWO D. P::'ySIOAL :AtCKG,'4U1 ID: 1 . Topography: The subject site is basically level. 2. Soils: Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo) . Permeability is moderately slow. There is a seasonal highwater table at or near the surface. Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard unless flood protection is provided. This soil is used for row crops , pasture and urban development. 3. Vegetation: The only vegetation on site consists of scrub brush, grass and weeds . 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No surface water was observed on the subject site (July 2, 1982) . 6. Land Use: The subject site was part of a golf course but is being prepared for future office • and warehousing uses. Similar uses are to the east of the subject site .while the property to the south and west is also being prepared for storage uses. The property to the north remains undeveloped. E. NEI ;n;;I, ;I OON C RACTE ISTIOS: The surrounding properties are a combination of warehousing, storage and office park- uses. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: Twelve-inch water mains extend east-west on S.W. 7th Street and north-south on Powell Avenue S.W. with a ten-inch sanitary sewer also located on Powell Avenue S.W. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by" the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Not applicable. 4. Schools : Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMP' um,'NSIVE r LAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOOD1 IvT. 1 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, June 1976. 2. Policies Element, Comprehensive Plan (1981 ) . I. IMPACT ON 'T.E NATURAL OR ': IE m i\i 1 IROi T: 1 . Natural Systems : Construction on the site will • remove the vegetation,. disturb the soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the vicinity. Through proper development controls and procedures, however, these impacts can be mitigated. PRELIMINARY REPORT T 'HE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE THREE 2. Population/Employment: Some increase in employment opportunities may be expected. 3. Schools : Not applicable. 4. Social: Minor. 5. Traffic : The proposed development will increase traffic in the vicinity by approximately 1 , 640 average daily trips . J. Ema,N*NMENTAL ASSESS T/'7L"U1 ES::OLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a Memorandum of Concurrence was issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee in January, 1982. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS C vNTM T'ED: 1 . City of Renton Building & Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Policy Development Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site and the present zoning of M-P, Manufacturing Park. 2. The proposal is to construct four (4) buildings totaling 46 ,400 square feet on proposed Lot 8 of Washington Technical Center. The applicant proposes that up to 30% of the floor space will be utilized for office with 70% remaining for light industrial uses. The site plan as presented show parking along the perimeters of the lot adjacent to Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street with the loading areas contained within a court yard. The proposal utilizes common access drives along the southern and western property lines. The applicant has applied for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (A) (1 ) which requires the driveways not be closer than five (5) feet to any property line. Applying Section 4-722 (G) (3) it can be determined that the variance is warranted as follows: • HARDSHIP: The first criteria requires that a hardship exists as a result of size, shape, topography, or location to surroundings. The size and shape of a lot created in a manufacturing park is a direct result of the industrial function and the market. In this specific case, a 300 x .400 lot is proposed and will consist of approximately 120, 000 square feet. This is a small to medium sized industrial lot. Many of the new industrial lots farther to the south have buildings located on them which are 1 00, 000 to 200,000 square feet in size and the lots are 4+ acres in size. The function of any industrial PRELIMINARY REF P TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREG`I -a KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13, 1982 PAGE FOUR park is to maximum the coordination between adjoining internal uses. Section 4-2204 (2) (C) (1 ) states that there shall not be more than two driveways for each 330 feet of street frontage on property under unified ownership or control. This clearly shows an attempt to limit access . The applicant is proposing to limit access more by controlling and encouraging on-site circulation. Therefore, strict application of size and the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant the original functional intent of an industrial park. MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL: Reducing the access points onto major streets would limit the potential points of conflict with traffic flowing on those streets and from a design point of view, it should be encouraged. In actuality, the proposal would ultimately reduce the curb cuts by 50% and would not create a detrimental impact upon the adjacent properties or general public. SPECIAL PRIVILEDGE: The Parking and Loading Ordinance specifically disallows the creation of a common curb cut; however, in the next section it specifically encourages, though indirectly, close consideration of curb cut locations . This consideration in the past has allowed the City in the case of Koll Industrial Park (Files SA-269-78 and FP-362-79) to allow a uniform cohesive development serviced by common curb cuts and access easements. In addition, the Sunset Square proposal (File SA-104-80) allowed joint use, parking and access easements for the development of a shopping center. This would suggest that in cases of coordinated, comprehensively planned commercial or industrial facilities that a variance should not be considered a special priviledge. It would be considered a functional necessity and a reasonable decision. In some cases, the buildings were originally designed to function independently but based upon the market and eventual sales of the property, the buildings function together as an industrial complex. This is the present case of the Benaroya portion of Glacier Park Development along S.W. 43rd Street. In that particular case, curb cuts have been eliminated, security fences installed and access limited to common driveways and gatehouses. MINIMUM NECESSARY VARIANCE: The applicant' s proposal would reduce the number of curb cuts by 50%. The variance request is the minimum necessary to allow this reduction to happen. However, each site plan review should consider the functional acceptability of placing a common curb cut on a property line. In the case of the western property line, the thirty (30) feet utility and access easement is actually reserved to allow future rail access to the site. Allowing a curb cut at this location would appear to conflict with that ultimate intent. PRELIMINARY REPORT T THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING, SA-094-81 ' JULY 13, 1982 PAGE FIVE The Building Division advises that other parking variances maybe necessary as a result of the statements that all parking must be on-premise parking. A parking space does not function by itself. Necessary access aisles must be provided. In the case of sharing a common curb cut, access is then joint and provisions for joint access easements should be provided. Granting of the curb cut variance along with the requirement to provide joint access easements should be sufficient to address this issue. 3. The primary natural issue accompanying the development of this entire site has been the question of present and future flood water storage. The prelimary plat required dedication of sufficient area to construct the fore-bay for the P-1 Channel together with the Environmental Review Committee's decision to require the applicant to construct sufficient storage to mitigate any filling of the subject site. This primary issue appears to have been resolved. However, final resolution will not occur until the final plat is recorded and the property is transferred to the City of Renton. Therefore, any site approval should be conditioned upon filing of the final plat. 4. A secondary major issue surrounding the development of the subject site has been traffic generation. The Manufacturing Park Zone would allow all types of development ranging from light industrial through all office. Surprisingly, the heaviest anticipated use would be the light warehousing according to the ITE manual generating 50 trips per 1 ,000 square feet. The EIS prepared suggests a maximum of 30% office over the entire development which would anticipate that one complex may be all office and another complex might be all industrial. In any case, the focus comes back to the two "choke points" that limit access to the general area. The Environmental Review Committee specifically included participation in the traffic signals at S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. in the amount of 20% and improvements in the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way in the amount of 35% with the additional requirement that the developer construct the extension of S.W. Powell Avenue. The Enviromental Review Committee in issuing the Memorandum of Concurrence for the site approval stated clearly that "the intersection of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way will be unsafe until the intersection is signalized. Therefore, Powell Avenue can not be open to Grady Way until the signalization is completed to City standards. " This is a simple statement which is not a requirement of the Environmental Review Committee. Even though the initial two site approvals probably would not generate sufficient traffic levels to warrent the installation of the traffic signal, it seems inconsistent to require that Powell Avenue be extended prior to the development of Phase 1 , but not be open for public use. The matter could be resolved by requiring the applicant to install the traffic signal and then have him seek a latecomer' s agreement from adjacent developments. PRELIMINARY REP( TO THE HEARING EXAMINER ' 1 ), HOLVICK, deREGT KOERING, SA-094-81 JULY 13 , 1982 PAGE SIX In the case of the intersection at S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. , those improvements are presently included in the bond which the applicant has submitted to allow filing of the final plat. However, a bond is a very tenuous instrument to proceed against and the cash should be available to allow the City to develop that intersection at this time. The City has currently designed the revisions for that intersection and has other property owners within the general area committed to proportionate shares in that signalization cost. 5. The applicant has provided 102 parking spaces for the subject. site. The 46 ,404 square feet of building space (30% office and 70% warehousing) would require exactly 102 parking spaces. However, the 13 spaces provided on the west side of Building No. 15 cannot be considered permanent because they are adjacent to an access easement which would provide for future rail extension to the plat. Elimination of these 13 spaces would reduce permanent parking to 89 spaces and reduce the maximum allowable office development within these four buildings to 23% of the total volume or 10, 675 square feet. To assure that no more than 23% of the building floor area can be developed for office, restrictive covenants should be filed limiting total office space on Lot 8 to require a new site plan approval if the 1 0, 600 square feet of office space is exceeded. Primary intent of the restrictive covenants is to notify any future owner that there is a limitation on development on the site unless there is additional City review. It should be pointed out that at some point the buildings may become all office in nature and there may be sufficient area if the interior court designated for loading area was redeveloped into parking lots. 6. The Fire Department advises that all fire hydrants should be installed prior to construction. 7. The landscaping plan meets the intent of the original presentations for the preliminary plat, but lack an irrigation system required by City code. M. DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the variance request, V-014-82, be approved subject to the condition that joint access easements be filed on all affected property lines as they are approved by the Hearing Examiner after site plan approval. Approval of the site plan request, -SA-094-81 , subject to the following: 1 . Filing of the final plat for Washington Technical Center. 2. Signalization of the intersection of S.W. Grady and Powell Avenue S.W. prior to occupancy. 3. Filing of restrictive covenants requiring site plan approval at the time office space exceeds 23% of the total 46 ,404 square foot building area or 10, 675 square feet. 4. Require payment of participation (35%) in signal improvements to S.W. 7th Street and Edwards Avenue S.W. within 60 days after issuance of building permits. 7\\\\\N::: !!.1P,sl ' 4( • 4;r:// , _ /.. . . ,, , it 4-1 ////1744, , hl , 0/ 4...t,0 • ir. - 4irt jr Pi.,4 - / L s I • , i ArPe<'‘' . , ifk 14 ,!, ,,t, iik.a • ./, . Ltit.i a1,/-4..1,/, 4fi4, Iif e `ram ,4404.4L444li4i o f - 6:* 4:Vbc ‘-471. ' 7- k . 1:11/ 11; • \-,....' •11' ' ;41. '.. - , ' , iti : .4 te-1., ' kit 1 ---41'--4:Ybi I- ' ' slit!, 'eifiP0e'? 6arit I" ' -44tar,114%/714:414- .Cw14-41' !Ii','"I fki4101/0, triii kirl 4?-.1.0/ ' ��• tr,17 7 it , \? 3, rjr iijt Maio i /64)4( - ‘r tt, I S le . _ . . ... . ri-T , Si 4:4 _� - -_ __._ _ - -- -1 - - - r - _ _ _-- — S.W. _ .. �ME %X i N ; I 1 \ 1 , i ' I 1 i; Q 3 i HOLVICK, deRErT. & KOERING SA-094-81 BUILDINGS 12 , 13 , 14 & 15 WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER 1 APPLICANT Holvick , deRegt & Koering TOTAL AREA + 3 . 36 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Powell Ave . S . W . . & S . W. 7th Street EXISTING ZONING M-P , Manufacturing Park EXISTING USE Vacant/Golf Course PROPOSED USE Industrial Park COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park COMMENTS 4—_ li • 142lj1 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • '11 plication : � � �---SI/.1 ..APPR 6 •._C]rQ!AeleA eces a 6,4 a -is). oft.ityclohe vPelee* 4D1o.1105 . Lk t1lit V4 Lccation:$WeorineH0'" tom/ __l_ _ff1 gj /f ,„ 4 v . Al.pl t :reperil 1_14644 de 1 ; Public ks Department • ngineering Division SCHEDULED ERC DATE:, y Traffic Eng. Division SCHEDULED HEARING DALE: ""'"12•"' ❑Uti iities Eng. Division• -- � - • Fire Dep,irtmornt: • Parks Department DBui1dirig Deportment Q Police Department • Others: . - -.-... - - - . • • k20MMEN TS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARD.! ::G TEl S APPLICATION SHOC)LD I3E PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO .t'rIE PLANNING 'DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. PEV1Eiti1NG DEPARTMENP/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions f Not Approved • 2 ., •6Je - /h s-.-l(ic.76i f Q.0 c e. "2- # �— a) �-- �� ,�//•..c..•r4.vi d'y.0 � +,r�s�Q •� � ,r-t a . '�>' � � '`.-ee 6`"- DATE: /2 2 2-4-/ gnatore of DirL. 31' or Auth rize Representative REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: girt f, (]Approved ipproved with Conditions [] Not Approved • O/ Sire I / r c /y ' nweiX �c' ro v1,;lec t �B r r e G+i e o gdept Ct C C e S S /O k /'v v„1„/ e D c C.M 1a c l -- DATE: /?'v?/- ?/ • Signature of Director or Authorized Fepre.- tive OF 1 . k'N If :;,w 0 THE CITY OF RENTON ,, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o '".t. ' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR a POLICE DEPARTMENT 9,0 r0' • HUGH R.DARBY. CHIEF 0,9Ire0 SEPlog' CITY OF RENy®H� ; lei E M O R A P C 1I 1�YDU � gp1981 � � DE TO: The Environmental Review Committee FROM: Lieutenant D. R. Persson BUILDING1°14 A�T�1? RE: Springbrook Technical Center After reviewing both applications for site approval in the Springbrook Technical Center, I find that both requests will have a substantial impact on the Renton Police Department's operation. As I am sure you are aware, the Renton Police Department requested six additional officers for 1982. This amount of officers was necessary to meet the increasing demands placed upon the police department by the general public.. The six positions were denied in the 1982 budget, which means that we cannot continue to offer the same level of service to the citizens of Renton if building is allowed to continue without additional help for the police department. Naturally the impacts that a development such as this will place on the department can be mitigated to some extent by proper building methods. These methods include but are not limited to such things as proper placement of outside lighting; burglar alarm systems; security windows, doors, and locks. Another major concern of this development is the traffic that will be generated. At the present time we have a traffic situation at Southwest 7.th' and Hardie that is unbelievable. Everyone agrees that a traffic signal is necessary at this intersection, however, the signal and funds for the signal do not appear to be present or even available in the immediate future. This development will further impact this particular intersection as well as the intersections of 7th and Lind, 10th and Lind, Lind and Grady Way, as those intersections will be the major access points to the new development. Therefore, it is my suggestion that this development not be allowed..until : 1 There is a signal at 7th and Hardie. 2 Powell Avenue Southwest be completed all the way through to Grady Way, and the intersection at Grady Way and Powell be signalized. 3) The intersection at Lind and Grady Way be improved; some fairly inexpensive improvements .at the intersection of Lind and Grady can be accomplished which would greatly enhance the traffic flow on a short term basis. . • Because of the above reasons, I strongly urge a declaration of significance be issued on this project. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e-93e---b 6 gd Approved Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved ed-- - - -- - _ -— DATE: 12-ZZ-s� Sicc") of Director or Ait i��rized ReE�rosentati ve - -___ • --Y/ /. • a _ �� y \ 1 H L,- FM, �\ off 1 I 1 \--- / \ (x H ' I d : ' I Q \\... / • Y. • ® �// ij \ t � l J. f 1.e .OP...Imo .. rt.u . `_q H ir( 1 OW 7 TM , In iv- NE. 6 . _.____ 1; 2 \ P i SITE U I ! .\ ( * ii ei we . \ ____.\_ 5—;.1 1,-1..: iVo 1—.LI : O. 'Sw- eatt remit repel.for all surcharoiN noRS • ..1 _. `71>•S PoJ00' SS _ ( • .. rca<m„r w,•rw�.an e, .. 0 • ,g-\ , Aioct 11 w � ,me.<,w. tenant ni i i%sn. �� '■A■A 9 _ a o ,„7"„,,,, Rene:i..exI'®:.nSe.m��Nnu..`viirnl.s•.••• :i'eon.) hi • r.. .. , \ 1 11Ell \\ R. =. ▪ ,..w.b �,,.e..,rk..L: ,..q,',—,\/,',.,",,, • % l -.-; ' IL R_ EN-TON L 0w,.r„r,..m, e 1,,,,,,,, , pin. ;,,......., , \ .; \ , VICINIYY MAP .. •w 1e 7. 71,:t?,,,:iiin. w<`.�Ly.z.vow.v w�ia y wa n;o.,. ■ 1 rf',- . ,. g.:=.„,=,,,,,‘:,:177,,,,.,,:,=,:v,.,„, „,,,,,,..„.,...„,,,.,.....,,..r.,„02=....=. 1 ,...„...sNII pay all no, fees N0 east tends PI - ' } BITE PLAN - (see SOW*.x r+.ww...o e1n n.w.) 1 - I. .,. �,.17,....•\\ •• tll 1 al c mom a �m i r.�..�'• \ �..�.,..,....e..�.,�.. 1 �/ 7 ISCA1.• ..---\..._............. -%'.. I V-014-82 1 �. �/ A 1 ,,, ...., • ....... ......... It I Iv Ng . 1.:- \ I I ,-4111 1 I ) \----. -N•• • f) ,6.W. he veHrk AVE` 4.41.4 0114 4. KSV PL•hl - - 1.43.1.• S. ,,,_ ....F•41.411 14. LABIZAL Of•OCAP•110N :1---:.'''I'•!--1 --' - ' -c----- - ._ MrA. .... _/;--- -'-•-r '..... :..:.'• • rr••' - /7 {-48-;:ekl%.-- -. 7,t....1---- - • ' • • • MAT POOTIO•Of 12 14.21.12•42 0.94111 OF --- 1---11--^• ' ----..-- . iZTVIIIT•I'XIIP:rtgle74:::7.::7.'" :-.,--'. • • 1•..I.MIN EOUIFT,11,11.141011.021.11.21 1.2 . -- --172•114,414111. . --ril- i ' . Pr 101.1.041 COMIIC1011 AT 12 00021424 MHO OF 12 ROT ' g? i 1 • , :,,-....,;•rrarm glg.T.,.;.;N:-.:::, ......, --f.,.. , 41.2.14-04-0.4 2 0.2 OF F0•21.1.4121.112 1/ ' r •C__C-iX0.1"11 ......./.441,„„) 1 4.L.I.,,wr,„,7,-,.;:_ 1....,t.... ....104.7.MT TO 4111 VW POINT OF•201•11144. ill a , =1.7-•101.1 MECO 40.11141144 44040 2414 1.11.1 MTN J :4 s„. .•.....•NM 181 2.12144 NOON A r I. ..4 I En - .... 7- iil .7't,___, I:1 •-•:: »,:.; 4.1 I ••• 1 I 1 • 114•14.00•2442 43124 FUT TO 111 POINT OF 014•IITY02 Of•MOO FOOT MI.CUM TO 1142 c.. 21 14)1 j144441.2/42.4.2e L3 - . 2:111::•4111:70::74;r0;1417='2.0%1 WI: II. /MT OF 112011011•1 -a 1-92A-04 L,-'_, 1 _ Dui L v N&•12 _ , WILDING..V I i 1 ,. - -°'MM.=Mt 11rh 51.2110.1/1113121 54.1 142 I.. iiign7.7 OFFICE A MOMS,12 '.;.0i Ffl0C."T •441212.‘....arr. 1.4.51a.5515.5, ---.--- ..". 6i IGI Dit II 1 a 3- U EFE:4I.A' .4ceto 4' 111 I OGL4g.46 12£1-A•11- I ,1 -a--r4;•:'V.i' . . FIX2211 OF 2112 COt[0.4.42!11.1V .... i 1 9.104 MUM V 455 , 555 4144.4.44's 1.4 4 1.114 STALLS 40041240. .1. ......... 5 .5.5.55 a. . maim FAO$41[0.4211.4041 (or,S8.5• II' I -' I .7.41:--L' ....... n..... Ill ii..) TII;I!. In:;-.; -• 144.1,..X.,11,11.41.24,., -[ -..2r... -- r -___-• I, ,....._.....\ ..-..4.- :Cr .t .,kc.±.--5I ...,g 2t 01 SITE %III..., 40.11.1.400541100 F0041021<O1101.fr.,[2:22.LIMO 52,55a.,1 •• 5 0 W (--ta f55a On) 1 'I'' -- 11 ,....;,' -11.....• 0 _ •, .: ,, ,, . ....... ,.. , 1- Ii. -i ..t . 'I I t ' . Wil.G1N6. '14 ,,,,...... 11---''' l' i.) :-1 a 16' 3 :1 al 1 - 1 I eviLiviN,..iv . i Hi.,,,... I .% o 8•I a M,14.2.1.. .1 a 14 1.4.11..L.L.T..1 1 L 1 4,1- (3 iti• 5 i z ...1 i a _!..f.' _ . ,„,„-. , Il 1.-6 - 1r-i---- -1 II a. ,,),,,Ik -.1 itm, I, , co a. 1 = rd. 1 _,_.,.....,-,. • ,-. i. ., ii. .. ''.111''''''- ' NI ---14-::: st---1- --.-ti. '15,4•14.1 I' • .4 4.-1 t I L 2 1 I • --1 ' 1 1 -r--- 4-2 -II • \ - a I • • • , . • I ' . I 111 1 I VS 0,14.1.0.10 (.111.1. 1121.144 t . • I I I I 0 an,SA-0 9 4-8 1 5 ITe PLAN - f51.-P46 .12-15 < a . V-01 4-8.2 Eb ..,... •• t "A • . • -,.,,. -. ---...::. • • .. I . i ......................— r.'''''''.%.`.: • 777. _ •••.*_ __ • A. .) 1'. --- • — .. I - - • _-_ , 1 . . .1 1. 7- .H • . . . __ • . e.i....=......"....,/ . i 41 4.Tir...1) EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION ...--zia,-.,-'4,5.7,...rsts.A.-:-.....7....,-^-• , a I T11,....,... •• • 44 15 :_j • • . ' .-- - I--I •:'-' ...! . - ____ . t '1 • . . . . . . 1,I.-,1 • ... • • I • 't .1.. .----. .t..6.1, ._ - • . .. . . ...a.LaMar M.......a.1 Turin, itift......efe 0.4.1”.AY ow eac•.......•OreCnal.gr.T.I.... .,..,..,.......•,zw.....,7-„,...,...,WET eLEVATION ) SoUTH ELEVATION E• . 1 1 1 0 ci . •J-- -.. - ... • . •..... f 1. ,_-1.' 1 '. f.' ri- '.. r 1 1 . 6 0 . ,---,.?, ... .... . •„•. . 1,:;..---.._ 0 41 ., , . ui 1 , 5 . 0 1 . l'" 1 i X g 0 01 1 ... • 0 o i a 1 ..• • m-. • . Or , . 2 . .0, i ..: . I 1 I I • ., , , . , _,..... t.--. .. .. _ .._ ............... •i - 1 1 , i 1 . le .a _ . 1 • 0 ... ."' - I )-- • C.,....w.... 1 .AV •- ,. ) =....... -4 IA,.._......._,....t r r.,'.-7.-4.7.014:4—-6 ' •—.L i 1 1 . _._ _ _•• __ _., . e •......••,....••OD,•. .4.,4,.., I SA-0 9 4-8 1 ..... e ..,.,.. 0. • - - V-014-82 FLOOR PLAN . 1.) P. • BLDG. 1 15 2....al -1. • ............... ... "• r r.'"t..."... ..,*".. .S. P.......... ".”........, 6..c...m. ....I, ...=2 r2:"17.'''...t..7. lor n...• I • „.4 • • r• • .• .• . • =._. ---- -: ...,... .. , 1,_-,• , • • 7-F,. - .1.... 1•:..-.• •,,,..._ ••• ••• ..• .• IT. : . ..,.. -. .. . .. . 'r'-' • -.'• • . •,_,, =,- _. . _.., . . ....; 7. .•.' 7'. • . I .. .• : 1 _ tr. --______ • • I: ________ •,,•••r- ) -"r.-1,'L'...1 ., ...i.......-.....-......-. . ., It ' ..................--..--mtnct.,‘ .1.,.....4.t....-.-'•••"--,,,',.........„...,.._ - ... . . ""r •`...,•-•4 1"7. "-- . EAST eLevAnom NORTH ELEVATION . II I J r -7 .-. il t . • • • ..•.-• -. ------ ,-,-:. . --- ..1 1 . g;--" -".• - -I - - -- ...I 1 —i-- (-....7--..IA-h.-. _ . I • 1 • •• 1 . . —rt. .. . • . . . . . • --.7" '...7 .--7. • • • • •• . — - . .., '• '' 1 . • WE6T EL.EVATIoN SoUTH eLe VAT IN . : I I • 9 ..,'••.' "'""' T ''''''.,•..• 5:4-'741.T.Z5S.I. i a •... d - --r....-v-_-,,I ‘ - -, ,''t-at- /:—1 ---- Nt----.:'--"-- ....,rr.t.:3.--.-... r . r.: • .1,00 P. ,,}N 7. ii._4,...t.....“!fl'a ir. •.-• .- .."14.1-'41)-::1.'77:1 VAR*., ,..... .r.. • ". CH• .-1. I".14r ---..1-.-. . 1 i I 11 - „...........• . .H. ..0 .-, •• s 1 i a " 511 1 • *1 -111 i •.__. C......„ 's g pm*rola/MUM._r .....* • i 1 $ tnet td B o IN V...... , 1 .! • IB r I , 1 , t , 2 • • , II • 4 - a I 1 • ! GO O. - . • .. 0 • ••• . • • , 31 • . ,.,•• e ' all .1 • • ',b., .......• I....k --:::i.:. ' J••• - fr, ...••,..• A-094781 ,,,. • . ,.. • .• . • S . . I• , - ,11! L 1 ii'7..,:, •-::_ V-014—.82 CS rZ! 0 1 ,,: ..:.•, • „,..•-.1.,s, CD PLOOR PLAN . A BLDG. 'I IN 3 •,, • _ -_ _ — �• 11111111 EAST ELEVATION • .r.....,".....i. .111=•••.,..4.146 NORTH ELEVATION IIIIIIIIIIE • , ; L.wtsr E NATION ., yi u� h f • "`� I ail It 1 • SourH eLEVATIoN ` ' t a 4 a I ~' ' '" -�--'1 i ' I a I it 5 i I - i . __ - i • o, r rl • _ a ,, r 1 .® • .SA-094-81 � : .� = _ l' 1 w.:'..— V-014-82 .1`. � ` ,e ;1. R. n Ik FLOOR PLAN -t- n€ • 111. r 151.130. 13 1 n i ems_ NORTH ELEVATION .•�.�v ' ,.. ..t w,.� + �•..• ;..� ' au'.. �.. .•.� nn4,� �,�".' :wv"+j'�"-`.n.' w a.. ,7'i w p�i •— I m,Y, XA V'ir w'.,....•s.• q 7 • L_-_—_ _�w wr,.U..,1 '-- I_ . -_ � • - I ''''''Hill m. s` , r , ,y,.".-7 �� CCC— n I ii:: ''^ WEST ELEVATION f TM i . TMMa ; I ... i i, . �_ • SOUTH ELEVATION . 1 L ^„•'-m LiJ• _ j :fir: ;•...., ---_ __-- _ O. tU , /'ems••�"' '�.�' _ '.::....n.a, . ....S.r, ,,...y j I Y .: ? a - Y EAST ELEVATION - .��:='�--•'TM'JI �\ i i //=• f s. .e.,. .,— am ®r I IQ as."',. .y d I I . 1 : a I -� i i ' _�• 0- r • I. .wa.cw' Y7•• .V •w.4rN • tlu• 'IA •Mu. ••v •,' v 1 ,::01E..1...) • V-014-82 O O O O 9 • FLGbR PLAN . i A DtB■L . 14 3 • • )' 1 • .... "I i;I ."' — TDP 14.40 —_ w - 6."wK.�C.—Nu+ ,..,) -w.�ii 6. - I Man..,uw..n.wAn. 1 i-I • ppp fc it wM .+.KN. „w' ......vv.....Ce...T) , 1 222---"a7j I•` aY $ • • 4'►D. — ( •+Q -_ T..1',T, f �k�.a. 1` • KEY PLAN g ' 9 • +�• ° TYPIG4[� ib/ING Sitc',.ON'p-A' A / 1 1 ii .• N Ilk• •" <� ...,T.., .,<a ....mama tie P' I w..<.K 3 1�d�.,.fi�... C a' 7 I. yL� .G.c.<c.4 l . :..war n i a>...� I d ' liko' r.JGpIE °-.30" Y • b J F.F. IS`'-� Le yY + I. a_J } l " I? F F. 16so \ + f W$ C n- °I. •.1• n J _ ' .Tc. .i 9 j l l l f LEGEND /� Q .,______ •F - I..de.I<I - - c.a..,6 d n: ♦� — w<wna..� VJ 9. < iw'iii. to .� a j I I qw' N.aore..o..� .....,e.. ' one,a...ate'm' + I' �.' ve,.J '� '� 3 y I.I I :..— nuvnnb•w.0.m.r.MO. m II�qq ` I * NH L e J Mean.o ...K w r,� +b T/ ; +.ant ',.. %- •a I ,a.",e u ' •� 4 FAblMENT lnrAT.pN naN b 'ii J �v a°~�r.Ja M �" j J . ' 10. ,6......c.),.. I.....»1 mow. 6 J .u.c�..: .. ...o u c., r• ,..n.v.. !.6 _-_ ,7` ........ J F E 1859 iw zg`o d !/ j. [ 1 w • F. F. I8 2. J 0 na.1O.....All...... ,ro ADO POT..v nnw FP a.-.n. [+ee.p J 7 I Tw.. + 6 ° u,,.,.Nun in •` mu.L wa '+I fi Y T....•e n TMw°N`..°o'�:'ia r.tt ne.°` K! } $ �• 1�1 / w I i it I COW..nv. ..III.v,..c.v.c. Tel UTILITY TII.K. ° N®1 r 2 alnee SW% >� I. ten. d .,1 - ,..a u...Um..nuu. + �k �,i° — —1— c......,v., n WIN...n.a.'a,N'.nn u.... ■ I \ 41 ri TO 1.1.0.1111 FOR PIPES 27 MP A. MC..BILO•PIPE TO SPRIN.T.IN ...i�os• I N...uort ..+.nne w.kill.. OiO..0 PIPE.Tat I.:.a r ' 1. •.,...1.P.110.nc e1wnm ro..rwiwmn. u . 11 °°mn°a .N u.""' O .. o.n. .°.r nv. .i SI NTT.TRAP. • OF°.,B.AES P CATCH ERCENT. I.WITH..ININa COVE,e.io:: y ; 1: X 1 .. n.A 4.PAL AAAAA RAI.SNARL al PREM. i L 1 • SA-094-81 �� I V—014—8 2 , � n. ., ,,.. „ ..n.,r, ..... CES.LIN.MO • T V • ..... 6.,.�,C,.�g6,.G,.w.6 .NM ILO..,in..,io r.°'c.n.nw MO....-WITH NI.,.nn 1 -.e,.n , / ->>h <<.L .(:4-•--,?,r):".. c=i- ef 4 w• ewe a j GENERAL NOTES __Jilin.g.g■.�► n«�e.oe � .'1~MTV .am o u aww.uv a ww x rw.ac,.w a 11 11-��MAIMIW �i� T W I `h[ wn'di.go w.rµrreu 0'WOK.. t w:�� `� 6.00.t G.0.4.C2T-m wsaLv L..40.-+mti76 A 'l 1� 1 00 I Kof oh wa...CAM cvw.w 1 4►w ' /Bo `VlYi�t�4... � tint �)�U�,•{ .�V�r 1 - ...a n rwwu+11......5....S.a,c4..o+wt a4w.+ �� c ZS it. r ;' ,V 1.-Its- P.n.,wv.. w e:-zo+e...•.�',e..a v.crrw.»w,. a^�4•iltii Ai -xnw r s 6,..ru.ew a...a.R+,+r wwa,n w.a■a. eav+,.care......, � - 4� ;V-,a■v PLAN u,' I evr we.w.,+r..ee✓,a.+ca,+..-s►u.0 m5w ' [uac r.oNoa...YD.w■o).m0..01...LPL..e, a..0 Pee Co.a...r.b. . !r13141/0,01VICArase V-•-.0-'- '15•0 I pi,I •0........,r000,5..:405.4.09.4....•(4.con.n.). t . `,LI* L- 4! , - i it' • °'""` - w«a� w um.wu o-r u.s MALE,• 'U .; . ._ v• :.1•E s w 1 v ' •.? ''+ ^',AIL •.Nos a►0..R.c*ae V.vwr u+n.r.w..nw.a. 0• . , ,-n _,_- , r_.i. ' .awnGW..nT44 KS APPICA..u4.-MG..6 faira9 . ' �' v r . D • -u.+rr.,av raan..crma a va,a sw•.a...IN, e avPu.hs vavw.;'. • 'Yyr..` 3 2� -Mas.+N roM.W.+I IR.•+i4}tR WOYM-uMt■w1(D. , � {Rl •, • l `• I -st •rou.,w SISILY uu.rb Ro+OCD MR Ni.......J.0.A.p. / 2 N . ;. ;•_, - "G _ - - '.. t``.54t Y3�_ :� ,9p■ YIu fln...8✓A a ,u -4 ;'4- e1 I 1 ; K r.Muw"MP s.aw ,,,P• 0 k 1 lei, ,,, { i I �', Ld.NDF.GAPE P-EPM ALGLICt PLDC. I - I OYY9IJR�Me70:.� .I \�� O 4uu �•v U . 1 • a Ouu9uY H. '1 ___„,,,... •.^,. 'v' ,.., 1, w '+?..4H+Lh_,..rS•i3_ c4ana+- �yg Inn'.S , .+n'.'^-- ,: �' M:_d1. •Puts YK�NrTPO 0 1 ti � V - ED C:.- �' . a p D • a i I Ii co a • LANDSCAPE PLAN q- —_ Vty __ a PLANT SCHEDULE '""" � ..:m / .' ■ mem tun Oink ��■ w..,rt, -..-v. .,.a.. .....Tr% i p■■ V• ,. !e P.u.. �.M.4 I r.P1+4 o a*5 . ..0 ,..u..3e.N �.n do a.. ..... t Yx ,..... R w r.y rwwu w.n-.mau rvw.4''' 'rri IL. © w wwr eo....a.:,.-:•P.as aP.n e:o.,. �.erA....odµ _ .,vim. Q..on.0.. 1 ¢wnW an .n...N wm:P.uP WT., n - WW1 FW.rm•a.-- rw •-a::..o.o e9w.�uawrfo....,,ao„txn-w..rw ueoo. .. o, .vo..,. . 1.4 s PPmmo'rew rL.s -ww,w e„ I zY:-Hrr- O 45 v. 'w...0..0 r'uu,aui.' , .o..nu........ 40 _Ku oz..�aa. ,IO s P.•,.31,•'aCnuwL - .11f�w....1 tl,d.,. 6 F..0....., - YWL'E,CNS •r+.v.a: N'=•G T. I ..".... � I A. cwn mu Amor i ©o a stPL,.4m.,. - .rw+rs-,....z,...4. .:.4.N. 0 r.. .ra".v.uM w.»•a.,„+-> Prsr.s v,,...«., m'-•,..',PR. TKE, w.JI1G PETNL-TT Jr63u..G,UYIIIG DE7^IL-Tyr 6 = xeo P.,<ww..,•..wow-...on,....,, a»u..,.,— y To,a P... . 1/1 Lam- u..w. g 0: .. - fill .,8 111 SA-094-81 s ¢ a V014-82 - L 1 • • -•ve im.MOM. •.aeon ON,: r. Irn �.a) 5W yn iW1 if itri¢o Ott. WI✓y,Wes �T fe K s�•wr I.Myaso: S 4!•rlf eM /5.15 NKwMegf oW1nou %a w& if. -..771_ e$®7Q I;1 I Tiv ow.-5� nannw..o-a. �j 3 r .r .n a I. I K..un 5�M a KM —.m.a.ew uw'u i — 4oxr wwNet 3 !� e) 4•M6i b ewe (el.ItfetSR•AMW�awiJS ` W.uY A 11,15 4 NOP,an n..l I L:jjf ' WOG,'ruoiuAL Gf:okJ (RAIJSV6RhE hEGrio� ff C� ` 1=1 • . Q I • Iwi tI v . 118 0 0 I 0 Zr 1 'a • a • a • 1i I • • `1-314-82 I 1-0 A Ig 4 _CIRCULATED: June 30,198 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION :ET Ui�LIT'1 APPROVED • APPROVED •WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPRO VED SIGNATUR OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZ DATE: 7f2/" - ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ElAPPROVED IDAPPROVED .WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED (... DATE: 74/F SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI ED REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 • 'tfi ;Ikillk> • • • r t; MEMORANDUM OF COI CU C,:. APPLICATION NO(s) : SA-094-81 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct four (4) one-story concrete tilt-up buildings (12 to 15) to be used as a business park or for light warehousing. PROPONENT: Koering, Holvick de Regt (Washington Technical Center) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. LEAD AGENCY: Building .and Zoning Department DATE OF ERC REVIEW: Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined that the requested modifications to the initial proposal reviewed under PP-056-80, R-057-80 on February 1980 are within the scope of that original proposal and the environmental determination of non-significance is still valid. This decision was reached following a presentation by Roger Blaylock of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Richard Houghton, Ronald Nelson, David Clemens, Roger Blaylock, Steve Munson, Gary Norris and James Matthew. Incorporated by reference in the record of proceedings of the ERC on application SA-094-81 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Impact Statement: Earlington Park Dated: February 1981 2) Application (s) : PP-056-80, R-057-80, FP-096-81 . This memorandum of concurrence is issued subject to the following conditions : 1 ) Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. Grady Way will be unsafe until the intersection is signalized. Therefore, Powell Avenue cannot be opened to Grady Way until the signalization is completed to City standards. 2) The Final Plat for Washington Technical Center must , be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. SIGNATURES: 7 ArtiA Ronald G. Nelson avid . Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director • wig R' hard C. Hou hton Public Works Direct Date circuld: -' .. Comments due : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 101_ 81 APPLICATION No (s) . SA-094-81 PROPONENT : Koering, Holvick de Regt PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center Proposal to construct four (4) one-stor} Brief Description of Project : concrete tilt-up buildings (12-15) to be used as a usiness par or f h warehousin . LOCATION: Southwest corner. of S.W. 7th Street and Powell Avenue S.W. SITE AREA : 146 , 330 sg ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) - +46,404 sq. ft. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : 31 . 7% . IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE .. INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : X 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : x 3) Water & water courses : X 4 ) Plant life : X 5 ) Animal life : X 6) Noise : • X 7) Light & glare : x 8 ) Land Use ; north : undeveloped east : industrial south : undeveloped west : undeveloped Land use conflicts : minimal View obstruction : further evaluation with individual buildings 9) Natural resources : i X 10) Risk of upset : X 11 ) Population/Employment : X 12 ) Number of Dwellings : Not applicable 13 ) Trip ends CITE ) : (From EIS) Assuming 50% office & 50% light indust] traffic impacts49 trips Major 14 ) Public services: ( X 15) Energy : X 16) Utilities: x 17) Human health: X 18) Aesthetics: X 19) Recreation: X ' 20) Archeology/history: X COMMENTS : EIS previously prepared. Supplemental traffic data provided. 1 . Project generally conforms to EIS 2. Traffic impacts remain crucial although somewhat reduced. Signatures: 3. Flood hazard remains unreso d. 7 fLi 4� (///2 12 .Ronald G. Nelson Building Official �iid R. -Clemens Policy Development Director hard C. Ho ghton‘ ublic Works Direct r BEN' NI BUILDING & ZONING DEP _�TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 103 - - ,_ APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT : Holvick, deRegt & Koering PROJECT TITLE: Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. .TO: • ' OPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : x• ENGINEERING DIVISION 1=1 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION D5FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT flPOLICE DEPARTMENT OPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT IIl0THERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 r REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: -r-i4-7 El' PROVED J APPROVED 'WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED CRenton FiretionBu Dept. 22FirrePrPreven2reMMau22J O JUL, 1 1982 DATE: `,l /8-e SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT PRIZED REPRESENTATIVE f REVIEWING DEPARTMEI: ,, DIVISION ; 2§L/,-/ i - ° 0 APPROVED • AS APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS EI NOT APPROVED I -7 I-I"-1/f.- ay ce-&-v- /yezQ /////1 lMv� /et, / A-Cr// U-z - w ! `��'G� ��'L !�� .fr" we= /2-10, 2/ -'��< / DATE; ll� -- 3 � "7Z— SIGNATURE lSIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 6/1982 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; /'4'(j A?�EO ,6w / L��' APPROVED ® APPROVED .WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED `4iz cimeilif ' (-ee?by' ' 57e6/ ,, gai 61db2( a/4 4' /eZe744/ d ,‘,/1 ,7----i a", �� DATE: 4' 0 /1 - SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 6/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; jJtL e N r 'APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED /� g � TIr`AIAT11 DATE; / --1�r' , TTr]r-r`TAn An AIITI, r Y'9r!T IIr-r1r I 'I-kITw-rrr 4111111110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ALTERRA CORPORATION (BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK) Appeal by Alterra Corporation, File AAD-052-82, of a decision by the Environmental Review Committee regarding imposition of certain mitigating measures upon a rezone request,, File R-129-80, for a 71 . 16 acre parcel from G-1 , General Zone, to M-P, Manufacturing Park; located north of S.W. 7th Street, east of the proposed P-1 Channel, • south of the old Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul Railroad Right-of-way, and west of the extension of Thomas Avenue S. HOLVICK, deREGT &. KOERING Application for site approval to locate four (4) one-story building (12-15) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing, File SA-094-81 ; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street & Powell Avenue S.W. HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING Application for site approval to locate five (5) one-story buildings (1-5) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing, File SA-095-81 ; property located at the northwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street. HOLVICK deREGT & KOERING Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (A) (1 ) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines, File V-014-82, to be asociated with Washington .Technical Center, Final Plat, File FP-096-81 . Specifically related to site plan reviews SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and SA-101-81 for Holvick, deRegt & Koering. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: July 2 , 1982 . RONALD G. NELSON BUILDING AND ZONING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE mUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 30th day of .June, 1982. ` �� SIGNED: W, BEN'. ,AI BUILDING k ZONING DEP__,_TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82] PROPONENT : Holvick, deRegt & Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO : ' fl PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : x • D ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZON,ING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LI OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ° BY 5':00 P .M. ON A.s.A.P. . CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /11' r . 01\-1--3PROVED • El APPROVED °WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DC Renton Fire Dept. i' ((�FFi((rePr�Preven22tion Bureau �J JUL 1. 1982 (-'------r. , L7- DATE: 7 `G ts-e SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR. OR AUT ' RIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 RENi-uN BUILDING & ZONING DEE:sdTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT: Holvick, deRegt & Koering PROJECT TITLE: Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO: ' El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : x 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 0 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU iiiiPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZON.ING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ' BY 5:00 P .M. ON A.S.A.P. . CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ?e/,--/D46c El APPROVED ` � APPROVED °WITH CONDITIONS- Ei NOT APPROVED 7-- --i---21,_;,%__ a_.7 L c ‘((cw/L-.2-- l-E- , ,a,,,, ,41- cr-2- 64/-4- 7--,/ - ,,/,... , 2_4", DATE: !1/ r 2)1`'-7Z— SIGNATURE IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN U JN BUILDING & ZONING DEF ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103. — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT: Holvick, deRegt & Koering PROJECT TITLE: Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways a.t property lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : X 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 ® UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT D .BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5':00 P.M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /7* /j°xetif,e/0 APPROVED 0 APPROVED 'WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /.ed /a1 4k&, & 5-e-ef DATE: Of SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN U JN BUILDING & ZONING DEF A.1TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT: Holvick, deRegt & Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO: ' 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : X • 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZON;ING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1O APPROVED • ® APPROVED •WITH CONDITIONS fl NOT APPROVED 1. DATE: 7 - SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REIktrciN BUILDING & ZONING DEI--,TIMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF — 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT: Holvick, deRegt & Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO: ' 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : x El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZON`ING DEPARTMENT [' POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT IlOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5':00 P.M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ALITY APPROVED • APPROVED °WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED 11111111 DATE : 7 Z/QZ SIGNATUR( OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN,.-,:;N BUILDING k ZONING DEF ^_ITMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 103 — 81 APPLICATION NO(S) : VARIANCE (V-014-82) PROPONENT: Holvick, deRegt & Koering PROJECT TITLE : Washington Technical Center BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Application for a variance from Section 4-2204 (2) (1) of the Parking and Loading_ Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines. LOCATION : Property located at Powell Avenue S.W. & S.W. 7th Street. TO: ' ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : x • 1 ENGINEERING DIVISION 11 TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7-13-82 El UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZON,ING DEPARTMENT D POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5':00 P .M. ON A.S.A.P. CIRCULATED: June 30, 1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ..APPROVED • ❑ APPROVED °WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: 74-/F SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHOR ED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Y r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00, A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: ALTERRA CORPORATION (BLACK RIVER OFFICE PARK) Appeal by Alterra Corporation, File AAD-052-82, of a decision by the Environmental Review Committee regarding imposition of certain mitigating measures upon a rezone request, File R-129-80, for a 71 . 16 acre parcel from G-1 , General Zone, to M-P, Manufacturing Park; located north of S.W. 7th Street, east of the proposed P-1 Channel, • south of the old Chicago Milwaukee St. Paul Railroad Right-of-way, and west of the extension of Thomas Avenue S. HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING Application for site approval to locate four (4) one-story building (12-15) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing, File SA-094-81 ; property located at the southwest corner of S.W. 7th Street & Powell Avenue S.W. HOLVICK, deREGT & KOERING Application for site approval to locate five (5) one-story buildings (1-5) on the subject site to be used as a business park or for light warehousing, File SA-095-81 ; property located at the northwest corner of Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street. :64E deR+EGT 410.01ttg,4 Applic d— r-ianc-e from Section 4-2204 (2) (A) (1 ) of the Parking and Loading Ordinance to allow the location of driveways at property lines, File V-014-82, to be asociated with Washington Technical Center, Final Plat, File FP-096-81 . Specifically related to site plan reviews SA-094-81 , SA-095-81 and SA-101-81 for Holvick, deRegt & Koering. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 13, 1982, AT 9 : 00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: July 2 , 1982 . RONALD G. NELSON BUILDING AND ZONING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I, STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County, on the 30th day of June, 1982. °,74efflApir.41D1 �i 7s� 2La. SIGNED: AO/ A. CITY OF RENT( T N? 21796 FINANCE DEPARTMENT 3 - RENTON, WASHINGTON1a 98055 - -c� 19 F r RECEIVED OF O ) - - Q-a-k- riaAth/rw TOTAL <j 0 00 GWEN E. MARSHALL, N CE DIRECTOR BY 0 • Receipt # �,; t-/' • f : -CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME :.+� ?, ��'o ` t �:' �� rA�� f, s;� DATE t. PROJECT & LOCATION Kit/. , fir> 4 /;',.(1/;,,',r 44?a> < , / .A Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total t €1 i�t t.P�.l'�L;a' _. �r'9 y•��.',r'� 'rJ J'„<L • Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES :_.3e4 s=s Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank You. IIOLVICK deREGT KOER,ING Date January 18 , 1982 To: CITY OF RENTON Planning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Ave. So. - Renton, WA 98055 Attn . : Mr. Roger Blaylock RE: Variance Application We are transmitting herewith: Two copies of the application with the filing fee of 450. 00 . If maps are needed, please contact Bob Roed of Bush, Roed, & Hitchings. (206) 323-4144/ Remarks : Very truly yours , HOLVICK deREGT & KOERING By Mike Selman For your approval : X For your records : RENTO"I BUILDING DEPARTMENT As per your request: MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2RENION LL AVE WAISHE 980 U SOU5E Approved as noted: As per instructions : JpN 21 REC'D ONE OAKMEAD TERRACE•1230 OAKMEAD PARKWAY,SUITE 210•SUNNYVALE,CALIFORNIA 94086•(408)736.8533 OF R�� • . „ z VARIANCE _ APPLICATION CITY• OF RENTONT • 090 � � PLANNING DEPARTMENT gTEo SEP1 - (206) 235-2550 • • NOTE: TO APPLICANT: Please OFFICE USE ONLY • read 'instructions::. -on:: back of this form Apglication No:-: V-61//71-2 carefully before Associated File.(s) : (/9 -p preparing your appli- �� 95,6g/ . 5/9 cation for VARIANCE. Date Received: - • - Date Accepted:• -. Approved: ❑ ) :..Denied•_.:. ❑ )DATE: • Publication Date: Affidavit: Comprehensive Plan Zoning: • • **************-**********:***********_ ;.*-*****************.***********_*.***** In addition to the information below, the applicant should include--a site map and any other pertinent information which will assist -in the review.-of this application. The Planning Department reserves the right to require additional information needed to evaluate the application (note Variance-Application Procedure on the last page).. • • 1. --:Name of Applicant: -.=:M•nlvirk deReg.t_._KQPring • 2. _ Mailing Addreess: 1 Oakmead Terrace, 1230: Oakineed Parkway, Suite 210 - -- Sunnyvale, CA. 94086 /Telephone No (408) 773-0111 3. APPLICANT IS: Ea_Owner ❑ Lessee - - _ -- ❑ Contract Purchaser: Other (Specify) • 4. Name and address of- owner, if other than_;applicant: NIA • • /Telephone No.-: • • 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) : Powell Ave SW & SW 7th St. • • 6. Legal-Description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) : See legal description - - . .• on property map. • • • 7. State. EXACT VARIANCE REQUESTED/SPECIFY CODE SECTION: . Code Section - Chapter 22 Parking and Loading (4-2204) Part 2.A.1 . Variance for location of driveway at _property lines. RENTON BUILDING DEPARTU:CNT MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH • BEN"UN, WAbti• 980. • -1- J N 21 Eel) 1 M 8. Why can't the property bC. veloped within the requiremen )f the ordinance? Our desire is to construct a business park with free flow of traffic from. one lot to another within the plat. A common driveway with half the driveway on each lot better serves1 the common access space between buildings as generally done in business park developments. AFFIDAVIT • John S. deRegt I, (Pre.sideit of ,Holvick deRegt & Koering, the) being duly sworn, declare • that I am the/owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • Si t e o Owner • 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 210 Address Sunnyvale, Ca. 94086 • City, State, and Zip Code Number) Telephone No. (4 0 8) 7 7 3-0111 • Subscribed and sworn before me this 15th day of January , 19 82, Notary Public in and for the State of Ca fo nia n5 residing at Sunnyvale iYilliyie�Hie®eeeeeoeeaeeaeeoeeeeiaoe®u�e�eZeeeee6ee�iYYeei MARY JO ALDERSON ' NOTARY PUBLIC—CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL C. FICE IN Name of,Notary Public SANTA CLARA COUNTY My Commission Expires July 25,1983 limo mansaeeaeeononoeeseouimennesusandemaa • 1230 Oakmead Parkway, Suite 210 Address Sunnyvale, Ca. 9408.6 • -2- Justification for Driveway Variance Variance for the driveway locations is necessary to better serve the goal of this development in providing an overall business park environment for the entire plat of the Washington Technical Center. Other business park developments utilize the concept of one common driveway used by adjoining lot owners. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare and will enhance the property improvements within the vicinity and zone surrounding the Washington Technical Center. The approval of the driveway variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege since the City of Renton has granted similar variances for other business parks. Common driveways represents good layout design and use of expensive property. 4-2204 4-2204 1) provided for single family dwellings and duplexes. Alleys shall not be used for off-street parking and loading purposes. (Ord. 2787, 7-2-73) 2. Ingress-Egress A. Driveway Location (1) Industrial, Warehouse and Shopping Center Uses. The location of ingress and egress driveways shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Department under curb cut permit procedures. Driveways stall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the street frontage that the property fronts on. There shall be a minimum of forty feet (40') between driveway curb returns where there is more than one driveway on property under unified ownership or control and used as one premise. Driveways shall not be closer than five feet (5') to any property line exclusive of the property line the curb cut is parallel to. (2) All Other Uses. The location of ingress and egress driveways shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Department under curb cut permit procedures. Driveways shall not exceed forty percent (40%) of the street frontage that the property fronts on. There shall be a minimum of eighteen feet (18') between driveway curb returns where there is more than one drive- way on property under single ownership or control and used as one premise. Driveways shall not be closer than five feet (5') to any property line exclusive of the property line the curb cut is parallel to. B. Driveway Width (1) Industrial, Warehouse and Shopping Center Uses. The width of any driveway shall not exceed forty feet (40') exclusive of the radii of the returns or taper section, the measurement being made parallel to the center line of the street roadway. The Board of Public Works may grant an exception upon proper application in writing and for good cause shown, which shall include, but not be limited to the absence of any reasonable alternative. (2) All Other Uses. The width of any driveway shall not exceed thirty feet (30') exclusive of the radii of the returns or the taper section, the measurement being made parallel to the centerline of the street roadway. C. Number of Driveways (1) Industrial, Warehouse and Shopping Center Uses. There shall not be more than tv.o (2) driveways for each three hundred thirty feet (330') of street frontage on property under unified ownership or control. 370;873;181 Li Li wow 4...a.n.now 44 4...•••....,4- 44,....A.M.M.f. _i_it _L\. 1 . . ''••• ', it• .40.0/4 ... 4. •••Or se..• . j._ -' --- ... .. a 71 _____ -,r_________, . \I a ,___ ...______„, i • f-------- -v • .. ,. , . _. t 1 . • - t ,I t 4 L%i • : ...•-. .. 1" .u„...p.,',46,' ... .,..., .. 1 . 4 „* rt, 4 C.UiLvine..1. rF•.:i,:'.1•::2:•:4L;iO'7..Oi7.K-0':7.T";C':E.1"1N'l:B"i i'i"I!4'.M•,'P 7."•TF' --,`,,Tr.j.f,,.,,i,...1.e._._24_.f•iii_f___,_,,_-1,,„t 11.__4-,4.4-..-i,-,i1)_,_ •••- 7. 7„--S-.-•I4 1..,.-.44l 1e. .I '' m---4-._,.!•!_i_I. , 4. ......T44.L..e,4i4.e..s4..... . -- :I:1I 1,..•.- ..1 '.44. .,..4 4a•4,; -De anie -I/-AI IC- IIV„. • I Y4 OOO i ; I 0 _ .. . 6) I 1 I ..a... ,-, , .....•M.WM 4,M.M.••••• -11 /...10*.A''!..•'6:0' 1- . AT TM•OMMASTOKT COMM Of Off ....'....7.O...0 ...._... 00_.._.....0 1...._' ..__.._,.„..‘„,,..,4__f. _....._ ......_....._jr.t•i...__4_,_-.' ••• ..-i ;0..,•*i.4, .";...--.jr 11 5". SOOTIMAT 00.00 MIT OF MIO MIK./3.AMO I ' - .... i 01 OK•rellit GO Mt OM.t.ilif Of SMO.41•00 istOMMJAL Maw M.1.AS 0300•010 OF MUM 03 . f- -. M •- t .. ' • 0 I /l• • .1 r•101:44"44Cgi=ZVI,10.g r3.7'4006 ' 1 . I, f'-, • ) ',, i •IT '\ %O:SrlIT='Fir.'rISTrOONrirlIA1141;" 1 1, ' ' ..I''''' . .' 'O•1o1P:1 rf4/S`S7KTO'tr A,sM:AM..geT1,O0:!I:.e.T1 O r:'FMEP..TIAzM•OTSMIT=!l..M'.;•A La.OorC1:.O M,s M.Nf rl:rCgOtu.gOtt MT:.eoTO:1 O:3T m:FMo:0M70:sT%O:.:O"M.i.gMI.C.taI.".DO.i"rI.NT-"C.TI.tO.1M.rOT/Mfa417 0,1.CI;.K.'M1,S:"5 O•I" illaiii i ....4 ..... -IBnMi= - . . 0.; k L4.... -4..;: . -•-.-_-_--.,.-.%+!.-.*...m -....-.....-.4-a-..,7.-..__.•.....•...•.•.•.• 1, .,.. 1. 4 0f.i.t.1 11 a• 410.05 FEU'TO TM POMT or•••••••••••. •\\ ,,,.it .....----- I 4. 11 __i... g _.....--•• !e ..,,,...._c_r_././:!,11./ .. •• _re :„.„--- U 1 I 15.,t.olma. '4 4444t 4u. 0E111 4 .:2°,r‘ . ._ r. .41 • t 1 , 2 I 1 3• 1. )4.1 , - ,.. ___ Nt t I' ••• '..I• .'. ___1 _ Ifi_ 1 ' - . 1... ..4*' . ' • 1 4 1 ' ' I.. •: 44.1% _-2 ., i .4 - I j1Yy," .1. Sok ....:...... .! • .4 11,,4 0e.1. .. -t.e. i'''.4".• ' -4. :."Z..„-:.: 1-•••• ' I 1 •I 1 444., j, 44,4e ,/ 44. 1 *V . • ''.5"r1Ve g., .7...:...;....... .0 . .... 0 ., ,..,,,.•.1., : 14.2,4i4cr co.4re 4) .1.-- --.: -----,-, 3 al : c) '.1 -'- .___-)S2i4 09:1 ,.'-'• 7 '_. gr.it.,` ' • I 1 0 I eL ''''1 r: , •• •,v-1.... .. ni 4 / _____ . * '2 LOT 1 mo,„.ir.I , ,, , • sow 4......4 i .4 ...,.413 4.11 • , 1 .1 , .. 1 60,nri4•o ___. f' i 1- 4 I ,.•....r" :1. , 4 11,4•4 .• e I • , I ... /4 •• :,',.-...cra....v 1.1`e .• . /' f;'; ... i ,.,.1 _.' - .1',Fizs 1 . . 4 .1f . ... f .- - ' 7 .1 L. _ . 2 - --- i le, ,5, ., 4 .,.......,....,. L,..• i. ' / . / , c , ., •k‘": /111.11111m. el.- ' , • t, • • LIIIIIIIMI ____L_ it . 1 El LOT• WWI.I. I ...., ' .!, 4 .. -,rter•n•-5T.o•••*I ' v .. 1 ., !•• j. ) / . / ,.. LI / -1'111.1-• /-• - • 1! il (n a. ak ... •:,.,..1.4gtv-14,4,1;..M / . .,4 #.,.Li ,' 4....,, .....- ,-* ,..,,. ... ...1 .....,:/ / 4___ N. -II .1ei. (r) : i , • ...;,.t rz,..4.1.1P`I. InfluDINO S 0•Mr.•I , ' I . t..d. I '..m.•••.1.11.40S1ea 7.g.a.44 4.. • - ‘;- 1 •• 1 ' •••••••- 1 I .64.,4 • .•,..14.•144%••••MA 1,0,4•••••ii 51... • -, • / • /, - -..1 I 2 14";:"th Titft fl . ,.........---..,i.,..LC Wean ej j):.4 L..-s • . -- ,•.-Se-T.. -...-----11 ,...AL., . -4...-.;-- -4_-,- -a, ...- __./L--.el__••••- •1/•.• ,.• • 18 : /-••• , . - ' 7 • ' -.1 17- ' • Si/••....oe•tr ../Wily- •••••.7 .. !..••• LOY• WO..• -- --- no e•%"•••.7..)Ia.*am.. ' __ imos! 2 • __ .._j ( litlyr.-ire) 14.4••••••••••••r... •••••••ETA teen MM. IT41161 4 F. '4'41•rf"M"gievr./2.1•1:=I: 4 +I -111 . . . .itrt SO Male 1 1.0101,1 + + I'M.W. 4 e V e N T 1-4 "v e •VAIK No.04,1•114 MA. V,W..sf. ,..14 11,40•••••uul,‘0.0 .0.14.a/ 41 ............, -----C--- _._ .,..z-,.... ---4,--- 1 l_ _ I I _ I _. -,''• -.:--- ............. •••••••I LK 0.000,10 ?....) • -- - -•i-- •--- - _- ___T____ -. J -,--i - L - .. I 1.______ I-1 "1 1 e...I. bAltTeLL'S 4.0 I 1 T• am ! LOmo/.IA 1. • .11.101.•Me 4.1.o. peReNre4444 fur,NITURe RENTALS _ rsi Mr.:AL?' t4.40. I 1 WannIti ____4 = 4R INtiel.1.4 PiRe PROle6TIOM 31.57L/444 . 444 •••••T.••• ! ! I • , •Til: UT. 1 /....kl•••• :1:11a1F5Z7or 1S, •.,•,•Em 1 Sm.'s. 1 • , ,,..' 1 ,1 ..,.; --1-i• 41 Te PLAN - t5LCtl.4, •1- ..--- MOM'S, .1,•••••M -r., X . , k-Ur4... t ..... ,,L.,Loonews,1401,01E• 4S,J,•••4,(Meg IS) I '..!5•A**:‘..d' roir..:41:1" •3 A 0 011g.f. fieLmk 2 _•,,• • ! WIMMIIMY IMP a ,, 4 II 1 51•tt. shorig - Nv1d a119 ,"'"-CP- F I I 1 til i 4; e,,.......,„, 4- i r 1 r, t , , .. n..N Yt M f Ai— I .i'9' J Ii I I r. �JL I. ,: . - "I R T — ...w— 4 WO 4, 1 Ti i _,Z c `".: I t I. I t o I """ 4to r ewa, . av 1 t T� F: tT V I y��•�JNIO1Mq ) +O/ I.I 1ii ID ,f < jj �T,•.., ,y 1�; R ww....«......so S t 11 r,tiw. nws'w Ow.w.re1 rm.):'ii i,ti"o l vw.ntn -y • ti 5 r 0 i (1 1 wu "..,.=.'a_ ram.s..:um-� I'•n .{.n.:uw� av ....1 Ir �! 7w_ ,,,w, ,�. a v_!t i' I �IM136 `t�!17� (.w w�i �tii a�� ma law.*Ica �� f' ,u— 'I' sew ...,.� - .iR,J .w+ ___ 1.. m,III.. ' i'J9„ U. ...n.lo.POIe-y 'q I I I.'1Nia1uq c.L;.,: zi l 1 Q �- _pilaw l 91:�a "Ea c ».., t .. w , Al .4 .it�Jltiaua Z 1` — �_ AID A 11;11k........ ....,..,,NANO,...n....Au....1�w.0 -5 1 }r xi c.-- . --- „... . N �0.. 7tl.Oli . f1 a...wr .1AY HIHanao •M� r. , _ • . • . _,, _ .. _ _ NV Nal,...4•16 , -----'\ , — ,11.1 14 I ` I / 1_._.! ............ OF FILE FILE TITLE • l• • • t'+ Y ••