Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA83-081 BEGINNING • OF FILE FILE TITLE fat lab 0 I --- 0 t ; • • -_,1 5.1 .0,n Pr003 Bata A.2 Bles.16 iloor Plan /B :-3 91::69.1: 8169.E.....lona 11 first Floar Plan • t 05 069.17 A-6 11169.13 kcced Floor Plan — - ' r --,8-- - - - -1- --- A33 0109.16 ;It alralalaala.IP 0000 . . - 6.11 11109.1B Blolg.110013061014/1.19 6101, .ziumrrysar...a_se.rAxmeur .I •,,,,,,.. ..•uf,1- !. 6.9 0109.II 6 LB Pall SectIons 1.1 I -r--- 7 1.1 Clirle 3.e....1... ,.,.. at 'Ma:g.11.113.19 a:VP Mt'''' / dia ' • 4 m. A-13 Bawls I . _ ..., „....,-;=7-, 1 " . . , ri-sc/t.pare . . 10 • . 1 1 ': • I _- __ I '' I i _ 1 • ' -1 I I . •i ; • _. ___ t 4 1 1 1 • • II i -. BULDING 19 --- _---E____ , •' L• ....,,F - • , '.21.41DNG IC , Lc, ,.,.14 1 ' =INDEX 1 I _ • Al ..• t .Iii-, • _ _ ,__ ___\ . . ------4,-- ) . -,--- . , . t 131 - ..(ilA: .-771/. -- 4' I ' ed •-",...-12:,-.71,-.:.--. ' '' ail I;4• 1 1 'IR —.-•t', al 4 1 `' :..........,...Z I ....',, tp•.-- - _ 1 ___.. t• -I ;,44 - '. 4- 1' BE r o I .r----7. 1%1 I1' • , • . i , , , , 1 -: —1111'• f ' i• \ , - •• • ; • ; I • . I> (:•:".... -_--• • ' --- 9 I ,..- "\.`• --j . . . . -A z I ' II II—I•.-4 I . . __ . _ PlUILONG le ,,. -. 1 21.11.DING 17 . f" •••••1 p . , 4,...::. ,,.. , _ , . . ...... IL..f.„___ I ''.• _ a,..s, ..-_i_._iLL. ' . 7- • • . __ -- m ...419/s11:= . --=_..." . . . _ __ VICINITY MAP' fi',1001 2 11-71 enaachn.sr (...H) I .. . . • . ____P:, 0 yr..1,3.‘:Nr..... '••—•7 • • ' ' : I -.— . •tli' 1 / 5 I .1...../43/536a 1 ,0/6.0315W.Eca ,--..-.... r. / / • / I 3,/ T . i I I I I 14, la • ' I, • . i ! , • I • i I • • • -A.-.1 -. ...-: •- -.1—. tr.:'....-::.-t:-. —,,. 1...„..... .n.1..c..—.......—, ................. 1. ..,....— ,—. •i .POWELL AVE.S.W. • . v.-cam-FA i f 1 1 - -- r------1-i • 1 , , SITE PLAN 113,, 5 GENERAL NO I LS 3 . A-1' • ., • . - • . . ---7:1---d": • t....,,,A=,... , rj. n THE.... MAEI-LLM GR,,(::Is, i-n XI .1.,•,:„ a...........-:17.4. -- ARCHITECTS 1.4..2;Ia . c_c) 4 r,• . • . • a • cv • - . . --j Ln-- .0 1 f•-•-: c_) LU•• • • ..-J . I. 1 • . C.- • a 1! .11 rt Z -1 . a. . 1/1? 7.----. - - - c4 1,31 -. . / 11 / i .___.. z. !. 8 0 1,-F- • • . • t_-_-.1 ,? A 1 -- 1) 1 I 1: .1 Ni•ti, I a 0---- .,?., - • ---i -- . • . ,_. --- I• 11.a. • . . _ 1-t, ,_ __•L, i . i . 0( {- • . . . ,, 1 - ----f - . Ia ----- - '' • —. --- - . 1.., ._ ... T., 0 `i x_____ • ' • • ,___,...: i . h ;?. (-1 1—•—• o I CITY OF RENTON_ • a L- • . , N. \,' . • 11 r: i,i -- NOV 141933 -.-.• o •11}II • , - - 1. i 1 1 /I 1 i I I 1 i 1 1 i , i . . BUtf...DiNG/aJNING DEFT. ao 0....,...,_ . . - .,; • L S' • w + ' rro.awn:....s.T'"."Tit• wc.00cm uwep , -_ --- ---- —_—-� TENANT NAME __ b I ' 7 H. 1 -4,,th,-, I T I I '' l 1' j 1 i . EAST f[.a'xJ[xt.f.�n.vi-lM3L T1�D C.A.EPwaF.IA.=ALUM.iiY.as r V.NO'�cAPE 2FAM • l __-__— - - _ -. - -___.- --._ -ate Y ��- - e, . /, � - —1 r ' 'i....j—ir u ' ' ,____________ v t T SOUTH yr NORTH - - �—r - ' l WEST BLDG. 16 A-3 ELEVATIONS • EIJI, . 3 .�"lam -� --- p- - --- - ' _ I V - THE - O L •�1� h 1 H' eus-uorrt C7 r�._ I- In... . . ; MAEHLUM GROUP • `. - e..-,,� ARCHITECTS n % - -'' ,77 � �r �� SECTION A-A „ar • r^ • --17 __ IL6�a,__ ___._ _.___ _-__..__. -__..-__ ..-_.--.__ .- . ir-1- . • • .. I . , r- ”L--, _ _____i I i. f. II - , II _:. E ',. . . . . , 0 _$1-111N, 'III y � i • - .. • • • FIRST FLOOR PLAN 9 BLDG. 17 A-4 co t et �7 r� � 0 MAEF LUM r o :y�' GROUQ _' r' ;,,, --.; `c _0 ARCHITECTS r, co z r- , . • . , . . . ,. . . , . . . . , . . . . , < . . . • }-• . . „ u • d —- • • • on 1—. L.7 c- --,--, . , 0_ _ • _ . , . Z. < _. a. cc 0 2 • ._:___„___:.._____ ,____,___ _, . ..,._ 0 z o • . L.,' cn ii ki:El 1 . . . . I .111 d 7111:pk III d . — .i, II six,wa ._ II 0 Lan_immmiw-1 1 11 II , ii ii . 11 • d II II I . II d a -i' E d d c II 1 . . . . 1 1 : • _ • . • --minim • mummy 1111111111' _== ,) . . -- CITY OF FIENTOn • I - fr'''-'-••••• ••'"R, ff. , 1 ill ii rg IP r7), 11 vvi rg '. 9 1 ' NOV 1419E3 • • . . . ; • • - - y • y -t 1 r1 ;1 — _ i .i . , I I t d 1 I I, 7 s- y— �� r �� S. WEST air 1 , r �1 SOUTH(iie' 5 NORTH 118. 2 + ay..� '.• .,�..) ram.,.._.._-CLAW TWO ILWILCWL SOLI • I I . . 7 • H _LI _ li�' r. •i - / - �. / - EAST I inr 3 'BLDG. 17 A-6 . . I • ELEVATIONS rR e.s MRS .N,.uwr-rrn • 1 1 an�r-w ue•m,.,ros -- .reM,s'c ER' a - -� , -4 h T THE • p • o �__ _ . '" MAEHLUM A.0. < GROUP fa.'JI YS 4 I •r- -a,c rarr Is-LA ;." cry r �— . / — _ __ ,� I - — t.,u. ARCHITECTS i`' tj SECTION A-A Pa' 4 , . • • 313I TENANT NAME EAST / r ,.T-,.P - Tomo . �� 1 '- ! tom- - 7 • NORTH '.j._771 g w :.rirt7 '" --i a WEST ii, BLDG. 18 A-8 ,:i —- _____,_-2 THE 1 ,, . I, — 4�� d 3 (lmAnium litt 1 ; GROIN ARCHITECTS !1 f i fl 11 4� I` � f` SECTION A—A SOUTH ' I ` „a • a . . , (0:- - ' . ' i -- '-11 1-1-1<r*0 =7 • - • • . .\ , , . � a a . 7 c 0 O Z \-1--"-°77-1-'-fr.\'' '' . i. . . • I , Q • f- i y L ! 1 • zi_.____ ____47-7 - 1 i 1 i. ,/ , . \ --." 0 • O I'" • O • • • • CITY OF RENTON u ' 1L!; ; • • NOV 14 i a3 I .. • E.•n L--)1 t i',r/,.x:t,','•�1 i 1'.,,. yl 1.,i,1'. ›. 1. . . ., . . . , •'''' . • .• • • • • . . . • . . • - , • . . • !WS re,.ts mum'sem. • . . , 4 e•-•Wilk .. 7-777-r1-1-T-1--", ; i 1 . • ir:. .,:agoo.. . I \ / C)* '11-11-0r -1)777; ' ; , iii , 11. .( .1) r_ i -, • . , , , • ' r . ___.. i I , 1--L, ah..u._ IP . • . _ 1 I , _ , . -. _ . _ r . 1 , • , ),.... —._, — i f • •. • . -- . . • ---. — , - 411i • # I •,,--- I. I • , , 0E141 — -•-_ ,,i — . 411 . et• • rr.,Tiee-drrre ,....... ed-cl -;#44‘,N.42.44,c4,--- co-c[ a4.y -4 _ - — 4 _._ . , __. :MV. .111.011,'--r ----- els.42..c,L.(............0 I , 1 ._ ____ N I • Ill - ....... . _..._ rRt 1. -. -- . . _ • (0 1 —• ___ sr *.t..4==1 '"' 1 i----L, . .: 11112$01kil,•;• .• I I 2 . -,,-.,-114.q !IL 0 . . . . /AI. •11:416.. i . . ..IOW E . _._. __ .___. 1.1„... 1--1,,,.r . • . * . . . . . /- .• :' •-• ",-... ' ii==l Acson,60,........) I.• I • .,- • — -f,4'.:4.0 I ' i 1 ' i/4..2 ..N. 0., s I I ME I11 I :" -,- "" '- I . . 1 • 1 , . . • . • • • • • • • • • i / . • . ,,... 74/.7:: •al, ..'r.;,..„.„. • . •:.....44•••:- 1.',4",,,I. i'.i:;4`. .ii* ' ".. ••"'' '11' :..:::t lAr". I • "--1,L.' -!or-fiMMVie..:/- •••i'-'04-:, . '.:,:•.k:.?: ,,;•°••;lb.„.4-':::1;• 2..',9?,.:-n:l',.•'!".'2....'4';. 0.0.1.•*---tag'•-..• 4 a...' ...,.../. • - ••.7, ..,31* 4111=1K.C.7 •_ ..,C, -La. • M••.....,1111W.,10,•-,:.-:.•...7.6%,22,..:....• %.•-_....• .272 _.NOMG-4.!!!,...:1''71,1„,,,' i . • . 447:- fi.,Z.:..:•' l!r'-•;Ayr, - ,*4 7:•'t7r.s7.:.--,i.;,, . . . .„.., . • • , . . • • , • SITE PLAN ;:arigii-it losspi LA-1r . • , GENERAL NOTES PLANT LIST KIL: • ..PC Erls„....,...,.. tramil..................1., 'W 'aim;affirili OTIO.CM.O11 11112131xeg I 244•41Val., '. cr..„1 -.. . To Rena ow IS nuke/twodago, CI ,-ailoonal=Tom OraarTtiOcc.....t, • • ante TOM& !ITOISTEU sal.Tikrza;iAlpag S. laer rosary ololincs• nu troj.PT, oron= otatert= 1—•. r•ac. - '...r•-r.In ..ruinfor.men arm To non. 05.11[Mai, TT,Tili rye.• ilep• _ lit=11•46.1 Ealaffo oil 11.1.4..r. 113,11.111I,na....jagrAh... THE •, • :....., ,•:, ... •<.- ,---,0 MAEFIli'vl C 77...,XI . , 1,!, , ':". .7.-.E rg3 GRCAJ" • , • • • -..., z -, ARCHITECTS C'D _ •LI . C....) ;1.7..,--lz . -7. . . • . --i . . . . . • ,... . G OF R4, 11/ 4 1 • ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ti z Z �rLL o • RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 ` MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 9.0 �. o9�TFp SEPS„JO- BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: January 14. 1986 TO: Files (All Holvick, deRegt and Koering (HDK) and First City Equity Files) FROM:ao er J. Blaylock. Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 'B' OF SPRINGBROOK TECHNICAL CENTER The ERC conditions at the time of plat approval required the dedication and construction of Oakesdale Avenue (2 lanes) along the west side of Tract 'B' from S.W. Seventh Street to S.W. Grady Way prior to the development of Tract 'B'. Development of the parcels adjacent to Tract 'B' by First City Equities and Holvick. deRegt and Koering (HDK) have been short of parking spaces on existing lots. In order to accommodate proposed parking. lot tine adjustments have been approved in which a portion of Tract 'B' is added to the adjacent lots. These lot line adjustments for parking lot areas raised the question of whether Oakesdale needed to be constructed. On October 30. 1985. the ERC upon review of a new traffic analysis determined that "... parking lots can be constructed on Parcel B without the implementation of the condition to construct Oakesdale Avenue. This interpretation does not include the construction of any buildings." J t u i a d R,g RJB:JSM:ss PP. FLU FP' �1c0 gt Witt) SFl I ?�57ih 2156Z s�1 - 44 -85 Fa so -62G•$3H 1`i -off- Faspooi8,26 1-At, .ay 'l K�►� ('uu'$'5 4116 31-,u5-nSUS 3P'9t119, r 1k City Or keN i O?.) R N a nni AN ID1 Affidavit of Publication 6 1984 E3UILOING/ZONING DEFT STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. ;udrey DeJoie :zP>mzm being first duly sworn on .-4 v W m 'Or%co261CZ stye chief clerk _ °DZZo�o oath,deposes and says that is the of I Ir-m 0>m z=o THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE,a newspaper published six(6)times a j>p=to >�m week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been o rp m=g v,o OT for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, <> c z printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper s t -�m m 0 published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington,and it is un m c 0- 73 now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Daily Record g» g m >. x_71-1 m O 2)m m—__ Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior c.o o o O 0=$z m r'm z Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, o m o <$m 2 33 r-z m>`-$0 m 1 to m 5 g•zZz •'n• z07o0mmz Notice of Public o4 Z S sUMFD°0 oDZoz8�0 Washington.That the annexed is a °'c j a ?� p >m z1 c c o-0m =z wnmom gi }�earin R8876 ,� o $ com m Zoo= CO C- $ m § z.m0 m 09,12 momz ozia "vAz m mo. -��0 �9 nmac9m"n C) 21m>O z z> as it was published in regular issues(and m o - z v 4°o not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period p mlAc m a s c,',ORO CJ* C j2 a g5 ?.m of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the n y am $ S a 2 m<m 2 g.f Ji;tl dayof Decarli�ar ,19 t33 ,and ending the I og ?a* goI, F. ¢.. m 7-go � o ^.flmMcm/o & -"•* i c Oth December �3 `m-r` 5 Rai, _ a9 6-zra 3 day of ra ,19 both dates c i»'} a k m g'm m o p~m4- w- inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub— scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee - QQom 5•$g -Doom m m-• oc 46.20 a - �� -�'°8 ro,,n2k6 E-t charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ which ,,, 3 3 v m a rm v> `� Ed 7 y „,-6.—"' has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the °�' °i c rn m cn o _. first insertion andper folio of one hundred words for each subsequent < m m v o insertion. Q lEu Ram v c)>'9.m o <o'$ 3 mmmvg - 2n�c CDm•�o v, 2�n m m 't7 i- 3 CD gm-CIm . m2--mvoco -3m m Chief Clerk ?, afg �,.�a aQ 9<• ins=2+ m 3rd. pn=s m• m. m gn>ca o yr_ 2 m$ $r v g m �o Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of n g� m m m$ �_ro'oo m t �, -o off= =Wt-oggir Rm ..acm January 81j Ow m0 aga0Ai�m vo.,gso) y� mba , 19 65-VE3725c_mma aaiR vm 053 gamin �.' 3w -O651) rT v v' a to - m 0 B.1 .-: u m 0 � Notary Public in and for the St f Washington, "e a g, -, 1SZ $H ` ° r c� resic�j K4 County. .�'?f?n x o o o a 76 m m —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955. —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. VN*87 Revised 5/82 OF I J A THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 5.y milL • ° BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 co. o P FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9�Tco SEP11-- February 2. 1984 Mr. Larry Davis Holvick. deRegt. Koering 725 Powell Avenue S.W. Renton. WA 98055 RE: File No.:SA-081-83 Holvick. deRegt, Koering Dear Mr. Davis: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published on January 12, 1984 has not been appealed within- the - 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered_final_and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely. ,,- . -13 • 4 Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department 0422E SA- OZI-b3 S HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Bad. . , ,~-, November 23, 1983 NOV 2 8 1983' Mr. Roger Blaylock Planning Office CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER SITE PLAN APPROVAL BUILDING #16-19 Dear Mr. Blaylock: Holvick deRegt Koering has asked the Transpo Group to review and comment on our alternative use proposals for Washington Technical Center. They have prepared a comparison of the changes in daily and p.m. peak hour trip generation between the final environmental impact statement statistics of building mix to a proposed mixed use of 75% office and 25% manufacturing. The review and comparison is enclosed in the following Transpo Group report. The results of the Transpo Group review indicates that although we are increasing the office use over the projected office use in the environ- mental impact statement, we are reducing overall trips generated from the site. This reduction is due to the seventeen acres being lost to the City of Renton for the P-1 channel and the reduction of the heavy truck traffic trip generation that was associated with heavy and light warehousing. This report should answer any questions the City has regarding their concern of trips generated from the site and how it may affect the original impacts outlined in the environmental impact statement. If you have any questions, please contact myself or Mr. Dave Markley at The Transpo Group at your earliest convenience. We look forward to hearing from you on when we will be scheduled before the Hearing Ex- aminer on our site plan approval for the above referenced buildings. Very truly yours, HOLVICK deREGT KOERING Loren Davis LD/gb 725 POWELL AVENUE S.W., SUITE A, RENTON, WA 98055 TELEPHONE (206) 226-1222 copy The • Transportation Engineering & Planning Consultants hiSpo Wow B 1. taa F,...� .die%&Zcrirx,L'ej,ti /Hi November 22, 1983 °' �_� Mr. Loren Davis NOV 2 8 Holvick deRegt Koering • ��'� 725 Powell Avenue SW Suite A Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Dear Mr. Davis: Thank you for asking The TRANSPO Group to review and comment on alterna- tive site plan proposals for the Washington Technical Center. As requested, we have prepared a comparison of the changes in daily and PM peak hour trip generation, the generation of heavy truck traffic, and a general estimate of the effect of these traffic volumes on the street network. • Development Options The base condition used for comparison is the development proposal outlined .in the February 1981 FEIS for the Earlington Park project. The Earlington Park proposal covered 109.31 acres with a building area of 1,980,880 square feet. As depicted in Table 1 this proposal contains a mix of warehouse, business park and office uses. The first development option (Option#1) covers 81.28 acres and accounts for a total building area of 1,416,230 square feet. The reduction in building acreage is the result of 17 acres that were set aside for a retention pond for roads that were not accounted for in the initial EIS. The uses under Option #1 are confined to business park and office uses only. Under Option #2, the 81.28 acres is divided into two parcels in .accor- dance with ownership of the property including 28.17 acres under the control of Holvick deRegt Koering (HdK), and 53.11 acres under the control of First City Equities. Under development Option #2, the HdK properties would be developed with business park and office uses only, while the First City Equities properties would maintain a mix of land uses that are proposed to be in approximate proportion to the mix of land uses found in the original Earlington Park proposal . The TRANSPO Group, Inc. • 23-148th Avenue SE, Bellevue, Washington 98007 • (206) 641-3881 The r RANSPO Mr. Loren Davis @ro I' November 22, 1983 Page 2 Summary In summary, this analysis finds that the daily trip generation associated with development Options #1 or #2 would decrease by 9 and 11.5 percent, respectively, as compared with the original Earlington Park proposal . The evening peak hour traffic volumes will decrease from 2660 vehicles per hour (vph) by 430 to 470 vph or a 16 to 18 percent decrease as compared with the Earlington Park proposal . Of greater significance is the reduction in the heavy truck volumes that relate to the elimination of heavy warehousing. On a daily basis, heavy truck volumes are anticipated to reduce by 15 to 60 percent. During the peak hour, volumes are estimated to stay the same or be reduced by as. much as 40 percent as compared with the Earlington Park proposal . A part of the Washington Technical Center Revised Site 'Plan, is a connection from the site to Monster Road. As noted in our previous report of September 14, 1982, this is expected to reduce volumes by as much as 15 to 25 percent of the daily and peak hour traffic volumes. As part of the development of the first phase of devlopment two traffic signals were installed. These improvements served. to mitigate first and second phase impacts. The Monster Road Connection, the reduction in traffic volumes, the lower number of heavy trucks, and •the recent traffic control improvements combine such that there will be a noticeable reduction in the level of impact that is expected to occur due to development of either of these options as compared with the impacts outlined in the FEIS for the original Earlington Park project. Trip Generation A comparison of daily and PM peak hour trip generation was made using trip generation rates found in the traffic analysis for the Earlington Park project so the results could be directly compared. The results of this analysis are depicted on Table 1 and show that the daily trip generation associated with Options #1 and #2 are estimated to be 18,060 and 17,750 vehicles per day (vpd), respectively. This is to be compared with the daily trip generation associated with the original Earlington Park proposal which was forecasted to generate 19,820 vpd. The evening peak hour traffic volumes will also decrease from the 2,660 vph level associated with the Earlington Park proposal to 2,230 and 2,190 vph for development Options #1 and #2, respectively. This The Mr. Loren DavisSI November 22, 1983 Page 3 Grovp • reduction is due to several factors. Primary among them is the reduc- tion of the total building land area from 109.31 acres to 81.28 acres. This has resulted in a reduction in the total building area from 1,980,880 square feet to 1,416,230 square feet and 1,387,260 square feet for development Options #1 and #2, respectively. Further, the proposed site coverage was reduced. These factors offset the increased propor- tion of more intensive uses like business park and office. Truck Traffic As indicated above, the percentage of trucks in the traffic stream is expected to reduce sharply as a result of the decrease in heavy ware- housing activity. Under the Earlington Park proposal , between 2,710 and 6,070 trucks per day were estimated to be generated. Under Option #1, this truck volume reduces to between 1,060 and 5,365 trucks per day, and Under Option #2, the reduction is from 1,575 to 5,145 trucks per day. See Table 2. During the PM peak hour, the Earlington Park proposal would generate between 65 and 170 trucks per hour, while development Option #1 would generated between 70 and 145 trucks per hour. Option #2 contains some light warehousing, and the reduction is therefore somewhat less than Option #1 and ranges between 40 and 150 trucks per hour. On a daily basis, truck traffic could reduce between 15 to 60 percent, while during the evening peak hour volumes could reduce as much as 38 percent. The significant aspect of these reductions is that the traffic impact of each heavy truck is equivalent to between 2 and 4 passenger vehicles. This is because the heavier trucks move more slowly and have operating characteristics that are less responsive than passenger vehicles. Thus, while the actual reduction in heavy truck trips maybe 700 to 1,700 trucks per day, it may have an impact equivalent to a reduction of 1,400 to 6,000 passenger vehicle trips. • Based on the review of trip generation characteristics outlined above in combination with the improvements that are proposed as well as improve- ments that have already been made to intersection design and signaliza- tion, this analysis indicates that development under Option #1 or Option #2 would have traffic impacts that would be noticeably less severe than those outlined in the Environmental Impact Statement for the Earlington Park development (FEIS, February 1981) . The Mr. Loren Davis TRANSPO November 22, 1983 Cr®Vp Page 4 • I trust this letter responds to your questions regarding changes in traffic impacts that result from redefinition of the development profile for the Earlington Park/Washington Technical Center project. If you or the City of Renton have any questions regarding our findings and conclu- sions, I encourage you to call me at your convenience. Sincerely, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. David D. Markley Principal DDM/lf Attachments • - Table 1 LAND DEVELOPMENT AND TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY Trip Generation Rate Trip Generation Use Building Land Area Site Building Daily PM Peak Daily PM Peak Acres Sq.Ft. Coverage Area Original EIS Heavy Warehousing -- -- -- 774,490 5 .9 3,870 700 Light Warehousing -- -- -- 377,340 6 .9 2,270 340 Business Park -- -- -- 338,470 10 1.3 3,380 440 Office -- -- -- 490,580 21 2.4 10,300 1,180 Total 109.31 -- -- 1,980,880 -- --- 19,820 2,660 Option #1 Business Park 60.96 • 2,655,420 40% 1,062,170 10 1.3 10,620 1,380 Office 20.32 885,140 40% 354,060 21 2.4 7,440 850 Total 81.28 3,540,560 40% 1,416,230 -- --- 18,060 2,230 Option #2 HdK Business Park 7.04 306,660 40% 122,660 10 1.3 1,230 160 Office 21.13 920,420 40% 368,170 21 2.4 7,730 880 FCE Light Warehousing 26.55 1,156,520 45% 520,430 6 .9 3,120 470 Business Park 13.28 578,480 35% 202,460 10 1.3 2,020 260 Office 13.28 578,480 30% 173,540 21 2.4 3,650 420 Total Light Warehousing 26.55 1,156,520 --- 520,430 6 .9 3,120 470 Business Park . 20.32 885,140 --- 325,120 10 1.3 3,250 420 Office 34.41 1,498,900 --- 541,710 21 2.4 11,380 1,300 Total 81.28 3,540,560 --- 1,387,260 -- --- 17,750 2,190 Table 2 TRUCK VOLUME SUMMARY Heavy Truck Volumes • Use - Daily PM Peak Hour Original EIS Heavy Warehousing 1570 - 2750 35 - 70 Light Warehousing 880 - 1540 15 - 35 Business Park 260 - 1030 15 - 35 Office 0 - 750 0 - 30 • Total 2710 - 6070 65 - 170 Option #1 • Business Park 1060 - 4250 70 - 140 Office 0 - 1115 0 - 5 • • Total ' 1060 - 5365 70 - 145 Option #2 HdK Business Park 125 - 490 10 - 15 Office 0 - 1115 0 - 45 FCE Light Warehousing 1250 - 2185 20 - 45 Business Park • 200 - 810 • 10 - 25 Office 0 - 545 0 - 20 Total Light Warehousing 1250 - 2185 20 - 45 Business Park 325 - 1300 20 - 40 Office 0 - 1660 0 - 65 Total 1575 - 5145 40 - 150 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) SUE -ELL I S TO N , being first duly sworn. upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 12th day of January , 19 83 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. • Subscribed and sworn to me this 12 t h day of January , 1983. _eot Not Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Ren ton therein. Application, Petition or Case : HOLV I CK, deREGT, KOER I NG: SA-081-83 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) January 12, 1984 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING FILE NO. SA-081- 83 LOCATION: Approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site approval to allow construction of three (3) one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one (1) two-story tilt-up concrete building with a total of 66,000 square feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval, subject to conditions. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning Department Report was DEPARTMENT REPORT: received by the Examiner on January 3, 1984. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on January 10, 1984, at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following were entered into the record by the Examiner: Exhibit #1: Yellow file containing the application, staff report, and other pertinent documents pertaining to posting and publication. Exhibit #2: Site Plan which also shows some schematic landscaping. The staff report was presented by Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator. He stated the applicant is requesting a site plan approval to allow development of the next + 4.3 acres of building area in Phase 1 of Washington Technical Center. The site plan proposed is for 66,000 square feet of building in one-story, tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story, tilt-up building; that this phase is located immediately south of the present buildings which have been approved under site plan approvals SA-094-81 and SA-065-83. Mr. Blaylock further stated the applicant has provided the city with the proper utility easements for the site, and that the surrounding area is developing into a business park setting also. He also noted it is difficult to estimate the number of trips per day this will generate, but it has been estimated at between 263 average trips as proposed, to 1,14.6 average trips if the site were developed based on maximum parking for office use • HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING SA-081-83 JANUARY 12, 1984 Page 2 It was pointed out that the site plan complies with the modified approved plat for Washington Technical Center; that this plat was modified under boundary line adjust (LLA-•016-•83) to move the lot line to increase the size of Lot #3 on which the project is proposed to be developed; that the utility easements are in the process of being modified and the site plan approval should be granted subject to vacation of utility easements by the City Council. Mr. Blaylock stated the staff recommends approval of the request, subject to the release of utility easements by the City Council. The Examiner called on the applicant or representative. Responding was: Loren Davis Holvick, deRegt, Koering 725 Powell Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Davis indicated the applicant concurs with the staff report for this phase and they are keeping with the same atmosphere of the previous buildings; that they are seeing a good response to their endeavors in this area. Further, he stated it is the applicant's intention to landscape the next set of buildings similar to the ones already completed, and that they hope the utility easement will come before the Council shortly. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was none. The Examiner then called for testimony in opposition to the application. There was none. The Examiner closed the hearing at 9:20 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, Holvick, deRegt, Koering, filed a request for approval of a site plan for four new buildings in an M-P (Manufacturing Park) Zone. 2. The application file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the Building and Zoning Department Report, and other pertinent documents, was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC), responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. The subject proposal met with no opposition from the public. 6. The subject site is located near the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W., and is part of the Washington Technical Center at the site of the old Earlington Golf Course. 7. The site is level and covered with grasses and small shrubs. 8. The applicant proposes erecting four additional buildings as part of its phased development of the Technical Center. Buildings have already been erected north and northeast of the subject site. 9. The buildings will be tilt-up concrete buildings. Three of the structures will be one story (Buildings 16, 18 and 19), while one of the buildings (Building 17) will be a two-story building. The design will be consistent with the existing building in the complex. • HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING SA-081-83 JANUARY 12, 1984 Page 3 10. While the landscaping plans submitted with the application are not consistent with those already in place in the complex, the applicant has expressed willingness to install similar landscaping. 11. The buildings will contain approximately 66,000 sq. ft. of interior floor space. Parking will be provided for 266 vehicles. The parking space limits the mix of office and warehousing which may be contained within the buildings. A ratio of 50,000 sq. ft. of office and 16,000 sq. ft. of warehousing could be achieved under the parking constraints. 12. The applicant will have to meet the requirements of the Fire Department for access to all areas of the subject site. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed site plan appears to serve the public use and interest subject to a modification of the landscaping plans to tie in with the existing landscaping of the already constructed portion of the complex, and further subject to the approval of the city's landscape architect. 2. The applicant is limited to a certain mix of uses under the underlying environmental decisions regarding traffic impacts and is similarly governed in this respect by the parking requirements for office versus warehousing. The proposed 266 parking spaces would allow 50,000 sq. ft. of office space and 16,000 sq. ft. of warehousing. The Building and Zoning Department intends to monitor the mix of uses as development of the site proceeds and as a tenant mix is arrived at by the applicant. 3. Development will expand the opportunities and variety of options available for light industrial and office users and thereby broaden the economic base of the city. New employment opportunities should also be created by the additions to the Technical Center. DECISION: The site plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1) modification of the landscaping plan to assure uniformity of design with existing development in the complex and subject to approval of the city's landscape architect; and 2) vacation by the City Council of the utility easements underlying the center of the subject site. ORDERED THIS 12th day of January, 1984. zsik Fred J. Kaufman Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of January, 1984 to the parties of record: Larry Davis Holvick, deRegt, Koering 725 Powell Avenue S.W. Renton, WA 98055 • HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING SA-081-83 JANUARY 12, 1984 Page 4 TRANSMITTED THIS 12th day of January, 1984 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director David Clemens, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before January 26, 1984. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the the proposal must be made in public. This permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • `r- 2-' .,,...,_. ' - I!t'... • • . 1. .. ..:If:'.... - ' I-1 . /, .. ..`----f„yi --. ,,,,, - ' ' ' • ' Lti 2 I I k..‘ "t. 1 --Z... 4-..,,fi I 1 1.--- .• •• •. , S r •../0 - 1 L: - • ii , a •- I 1. i , . . •••**pi •,,,, --a: r-- . . ' z'A.3.10) • - ' 1 , , 4 I ! L•••.--____„-.-r-- I --.. -.......• '1•......,„ I ,. "......, •4 ‘r r•••4-,.0.,,„ e I 10.. cc. f.• "‘• Prr-.77 I 414pliiii i : . l .. it) S / , • ---4 tk.,.. ...N.#g ,, .,7 9, . •'-'-',1i i I __ • .T. , 444.• kiii• : jf• i o • lollrr 4 ',..;" •2'..4 4,404:: V,..;4..O'''4•'•i;• _ W 't •-; ;117's i . . , ,V4i: 5 I ' . 1 . • ' ,, - - _:_,...----- , ----,,,... : N,,...... . / k '. .4.7.7 .1",'7th77..•-{ „ . ' irrA4 . •,-,;'74:1•L/4. .. • 1 .:,. . \ I 1 ,0 • - •• ........"' - — — .. .• ......, 1 •I• ',L.? •',.,..„ -**,1%;"-t f Li III• . i • ,... dr . . .0,••r Th • - .f; -• '5- \...•'' D.:-. - ...... ......, \ 1 • _.....173.A_.- .. 1i3Olgsa. • • I - 11111141 . • .4. .....-• ---.....- _....›.; _.___ _. _6th i .--.1 ‘ .• I ; 5iTE• fkr-',".:-.D.v.-,.. . \ . ' .....0.... , \ N-----____ ---7 — —- —- —- ----"7--'...- ' -- - -- —- ,- - --- -- s... 15 f------ - I , ' \ .----• • .. I , N , let‘ \\ •4..-.. •...-v,.., . % [ •II• I 1 1 -.... — — — t--- ....... 'r- - ..""' ... ... -- ..a j I ,.. • L . e 1 4.• ' .. ,.. 1 i M(6/0 \ - ' - -- --- i • ••q• \\ . I: -L-Z.% 0.•'. • ':..:';...;, 1 '. ; METR • ,. _. \. N . •. •:•. . . ., 1. ‘ 4 ‘' 0 I - • • 4.•,' t • _ . .., __ ____ __ _ 10—1_._ k_! 11 • Ef ' . 1 1 .-- ... I--7 — --- - ——'• ,..-- _ . • A -',..A. ...:; pis PO 5 AlL le' v\ L ---- p.CiptikS6 t-'... . t-40"- CPO . • Hi I \....._ !I 101111:001 i il 1 ' Tr 1 on ro , 1 al , IF •4;•S,t'rN i‹., ...,.. ITO 4.111 4f11 Mi lPi 1 1 glI 'A\ • 4.4•1 llomm..:=- • jin.. ,, 10,- li " WV° 'I. . • I, H • numill I 111 A 11110• ----<:-.7..---- nal" , t c0•0•Ib.--• ••• e, -..-....12:15"1---r- •••• ,, ----=-:•.M.g -444•L-Q Aiewili •IT:i MI . i Maiial e. HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING • SA-081-83 + APPLICANT HOVICK, deREGT, KOERING TOTAL AREA - 4.3 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING M-P,. MANUFACTURING 'PARK EXISTING USE VACANT PROPOSED USE 3 ONE-STORY BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE • USE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK • COMMENTS • . • . CITY OF RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 10, 1984 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING (WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A) Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing, file SA-081-83; property located at approximately the 80.0 block of Powell Avenue S.W. GEORGE SMITH SHORT PLAT • Application to short plat 1.88 acres of property into three (3) lots. One lot of the short plat will be used for an automated car wash with the remaining lots left undeveloped, file SH. PL. -084.-83; property located at the southeast corner of N.E. 4th Street and Union Avenue N.E. MAMIE SWALES (ECF-054-83) Application to rezone 1.3 acres of property from R-1 to L-1 for future light industrial development, file R-062-83; property located at 1307 Maple Avenue S.W. and 325 S.W. 13th Street. CASCADE PACIFIC DEV. CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES (ECF-068-83) Application for preliminary plat, file PP-074-83, and PUD approval to redesign and replat Cedar Ridge residential park of + 30.7 acres from a multi-family attached environment to a neighborhood of single family detached homes totaling 138 units, file PPUD-075-83; property located at 1800 Lake Youngs Way S.E. 0496Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 10, 1984 APPLICANT: HOLVICK, deREGT. KOERING FILE NUMBER: SA-081-83 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST:. The applicant seeks site approval to allow construction of three (3). one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one (1) two-story tilt-up concrete building with a total of 66,000 square feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Holvick. deRegt. Koering 2. Applicant: Holvick, deRegt. Koering 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. 4. Legal Description: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Building & Zoning Department. 5. Size of Property: ±4.3 acres 6. Access: Powell Avenue S.W. 7. Existing Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: G-1. General Use; I..-1, Light Industry; and M-P, Manufacturing Park 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park 10. Notification: The applicant Was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Daily Record Chronicle on December 30. 1983, and posted in three pllaces on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on December 30, 1983. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1745 of April 14. 1959. and rezoned from G, General Use, to M-P, Manufacturing Park by Ordinance #3344 of August 17, 1979. A site plan for the subject site was submitted in 1981 (SA-101-81), but never reviewed by the Hearing Examiner. D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Topography: The subject site is relatively flat. 2. Soils: Woodinville Silt Loam (Wo), slopes are less than 2%. Permeability is moderately slow. The available water capacity is high. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard unless flood protection is provided. This soil is used for row crops. pasture and urban development. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: SA-081-83 JANUARY 10, 1984 PAGE 2 3. Vegetation: The subject site is covered by grasses, heather, and scrub trees. 4. Wildlife: The vegetation on the subject property is sufficient to provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals. 5. Water: Ponding on areas of the site was observed on December 14, 1983, during a field study to the site. 6. Land Use: The subject site is presently undeveloped. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Development in the area surrounding the subject property consists of office and warehouse uses to the north; warehousing and an industrial park to the east; and undeveloped property to the south and west. F. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: a. Water - A twelve-inch water main extends east-west on S.W. 7th Street and north-south on Powell Avenue S.W. b. Sewer - A ten-inch sanitary sewer is located on Powell Avenue S.W. c. Storm Water Drainage - The subject site drains into Springbrook creek. No on-site storm water retention is required. No compensating flood storage is required. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: METRO Transit Route #912 operates along S.W. Grady Way approximately 800 feet south of the subject site. 4. Schools: Not applicable. 5. Recreation: Not applicable. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-730, M-P, Manufacturing Park District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, p: 31-35. • 2. Policies Element, City of Renton Comrprhensive Plan Compendium, Industrial Goals and Objectibes, p. 18-19. IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1. Natural Systems: Construction on the site will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils, increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the vicinity. Proper development controls and procedures can mitigate the identified impacts of site development. 2. Population/Employment: Minor. More information is necessary to determine the actual impact of the utilization of the site for business park warehouse uses on employment in the Renton area. 3. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social: Minor. 4 J PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT. KOERING: SA-081-83 JANUARY 10. 1984 PAGE 3 5. Traffic: The traffic impact of the proposed project is difficult to determine without any indication as to precentage of business park use versus warehouse. use. The project as proposed is expected to generate 263 average daily trips (Traffic Engineering estimate). However, if the site were developed for office use based on maximum parking (worst case). then 1.146 average daily trips would be generated (based on 21 ADT per 1,000 square feet). J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended. RCW 43-21C. a final declaration of non-significance was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on December 7, 1983. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building& Zoning Department. 2. City of Renton Design Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities.Engineering Division. 5. City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau. 6. City of Renton Policy Development Department. 7. City of Renton Parks & Recreation Department. L. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS; 1. The applicant, Holvick. deRegt .& Koering, is requesting site plan approval to allow development of the next ±4.3 acres of building area in Phase 1 of Washington Technical Center. The site plan proposed 66.000 square feet of building in one-story, tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story, tilt-up building. The proposal is located immediately south of the present buildings approved under site plan approvals (SA-094-81 and SA-065-83). 2. The proposal, as submitted. complies with the: Comprehensive Plan designation of Manufacturing Park for the subject site,and the present M-P. Manufacturing Park zoning. 3. The specific site plan complies with the modified approved plat for Washington Technical Center. This plat was modified under boundary line adjustment (LLA-016-83) to move the lot line to increase the size of Lot #3 on which the project is proposed to be developed. The utility easements are in the process of being modified and the site plan approval should be granted subject to vacation of utility easements by the City of Renton City Council. 4. Public services to the site have been provided through the completion of Phase 1 of the plat. Minor modifications will result with the actual development of the site. In 1982, a variance was granted to allow joint use access on the common property lines, File V-014-82. This variance is still valid. The site plan as presented utilizes a joint use access on the northern property line only. 5. The parking as shown complies with the dimensional requirements of the Parking and Loading Ordinance. Based upon the 266 parking spaces provided, only 50.000 sq. ft. out of the total 66,000 sq. ft. proposed can be utilized for office space. The remaining 16.000 sq. ft. would be categorized as light warehousing. As tenant improvements occur in the buildings. the Building and Zoning Department will keep track of required parking per use. 6. The Environmental Review Committee has issued a Declaration of Non-Significance subject to the provision that access roadways from Phase 1 to the north are to be extended through Phase 2 to a minimum standard for design required by the Fire Code. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING: 'SA-081-83 JANUARY 10, 1964 PAGE 4 7. Based upon the maximum number of parking spaces available on site, a traffic generation estimate was completed using the criteria established in the draft Environmental Impact Statement to determine if the project was still within the scope of the original EIS for Phase 1. Average daily trips (ADT) for Phase 1 were estimated in the DEIS to 6,660. Any development that would exceed that number for Phase 1 would require a supplemental evaluation of traffic impacts. The following table shows trip generation as actually developed in Phase 1 at this time and proposed in Phase 1-C (SA-081-83). The total to date would account for 1,848 trips which is well within the limits established for Phase 1. TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATED IN D.E.I.S. DAILY AND PM PEAK HOUR Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr I ; 2060 370 2265 340 2335 305 0 0 6600 1015 II 1815 325 0 0 1050 135 5150 590 8015 1050 TOTAL 3875 695 2265 340 3385 440 5150 590 14,675 2065 ACTUAL - Phase One Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Bldg 12 331 38 331 38 Bldg ' 13 20 2 109 12 129 14 Bldg 14 205 23 205 23. Bldg 3 37 5 37 5 (3,677 Occupied) 20 2 37 5 645 73 702 80 PROPOSED - Phase I-C Phase Heavy Warehousing Light Warehousing Business Park Office Park Total Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Daily PM Peak Hr Bldg 16 ) 16,000 square feet light warehousing Bldg 17 ) 50,000 square feet office Bldg 18 Bldg 19 ) 96 14 1050 120 1146 134 Total to Date 116 16 37 5 1695 193 1848 214 8. Departmental comments have been attached for the Hearing Examiner's and the public's review. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis, it is recommended that the site approval request, SA-081-83, be approved subject to the release of utility easements by the City Council. t. ' I \ f r...:.i • I I, ' •1 4 :,t f' ., �^---1 / .1 'c, ..,-4.._ ji' 3 ' ,k-,71" h a iL....,.......„ ,. ,-$1%,. . tn`f:, , ti�q vy-I'' ' ' I' �� -i XJ) I CrrC''1 • ,ti• /aki: -Z. 44, • w �Jy;�„C 7•r /,. .1 1-L:‘-4111/4/ / if i:.. .. ....;,.• , 7,.: .- , 4? fr 1'" 7•••/:/ i , --..,..„., ,..',A '"' '' • \\I '7.'kt'„ •• '12:72111146:1 r - : ,, ... • I ' \ R--2 to cc6-:Lei c ,gip . _ rie re�ekr , ': T20 • \ _ •1:T.. , , J,�; ., L ': •' \. : A ABANOD%vE0 �- \ \ -�- • - - - '� 11b5tr. 1 R-1 s ' uN r r;:: ‘ \ �1 1 t: , ., . . ... -t,, .....,,.. : . , ,,),, ; . .... . ,• . . a , _ „ ...„.. , i .... .. ..._...... • , } __ _ __•: _t_ •.....• •,,,,, ,. •..„,,,, ......,_ .„, ,.., 1 Iy 'Z E I • I ` ♦ , . • y1 , i ' � , . bra ' „e"+' S AlA L L_ , o,C. , VII - _ I I � EQ / III ✓' \ ' ,-=- ��--em _ $1:;' 111 ' 1 .! N`, --\...____ Liu • ' ,Q •_ � , '1 I I (11 ' . �G ' 1i1Iii ►11h1 ,.�, \ i L-1 •, O �' up �i. r'w ` /- Aillitli6" rlllll!"i11111111111' 'lll II1111 S=z �'�- HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING . SA-081-83 . + APPLICANT HOVICK, deREGT, KOERING TOTAL AREA . - 4.3 ACRES PRINCIPAL ACCESS POWELL AVENUE S.W. EXISTING ZONING M-P,' MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE VACANT • PROPOSED USE. 3 ONE-STORY BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO-STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE USE • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK ' COMMENTS . . • • • • . MKS f:PDT Dgall mai. • 1••••••• •••asen 'Alllik 41- II. 411. :s ....ir 1.1..ha C.D.DA maim.._ jig Nill .1•01111•. 77..771777'97 7-17—r T-17/ 1 , I--1 . •1 1 1 --‘' 1 , I , , , , .... ___ ...._ ._ , p\4.- I a '• all --111 ---- — 'a : • _ ow-, . .•• •• •• •• •.. 0,74 ips.04,a.a.aa .;.. .. Aw,/....i.t.0....__ _ ...1 .):11c, __a_ I 1,m6 _ 111 a' 1 ! . i 1 : ' 1 "., r Pr:\T___ , No _•761 ( . .-• . , t. ; . ' •!-:i 41 1 i D ... . — I a 1 fAilk \WIF •— _ - 1 •__ ./. C I ...• itIMPV(..." r"7-......1. 1 1 \ ...MB .'CO alili• 8 c. I NW NIPIr I .t- • • • : ' • ' _• ,...,... 7V.7.,••• .44: li'e'.. 1,‘ ,4 •••';•.+.4.4./41/..4-111 .4.1.41... 4":.-V:•-• TA;..a. '26:1..:1154,4'..•-a,,,..::- -,_,,,^4%-..''.-.., 4.'i.;/..4.. .....•r...ar. ..., .....7, ' _.39,i,..,%/111111111,'.:4.... AV...., '. -,A-4.iin. "G,.4..4-011•10.,W. 2=6401%;.r.......'r,"--:!•_-,r-i-'• 413.14''''.; '''''.'''' i . • .4,47':.• 17.•.'... '7..1;:i.:,,:ar,171•' 1 ••.7 ru••..,.);.-• e r SITE PLAN' a ' • GENERAL NOTES PLANT LIST lc mres..___mp CYVAND DI ONO VI •01 MIT DMZ reri•cmon Ircinell i sAsocas, • •-1. .=7;11VrEtrlir.../MITI:in.,1".e• °INK. as 111a3638 imams =IA..an.an I/6/4•4•01.. ' ..=BM ''''"."4":47".../E•77,11 . 71 .... ..„.....auf; 3112.: ...Mila0.. KY ay Iv, arianseuez lonagnaitaa t au. 1,s-aw.c. • - , , ..t. . _ •ictiniunille Wig UV VD VDDIen V ODINV 1.3102... VS.he.rat. Illp • .. ..... TI-E- - I . : :; ._ ::,,-i ARCHITECTS .:, -110 r ) •,,, .. , . . . . . . . • . an... ,-_... ..1 SI4 Pin 11.1.1 0ee1 I-) Siff IS II-r Ma r 0 I-1 flp,If MS.11-f11••• b IA {Ip.1/ I1n1 II-r Pl. F Mf flp.i) fK�1 Vow fl.f i •. flp.N .Ip.11•••11fM .- _.. -_ — __ ___ —. —_ _..• —_ _—. __ -. _ .. �_ __ _ _— I.? S4f.II Ile-•1•n Nlp.If•s11-)' - t�.rf•all•K`.-....DA 1 T 41 VV.: N .l .11-•It-yll•f.N•M1-) ... . . • • ., . e r a ... u•f.u 1 u 11 4eu-• — •••d Yor—•rd��t. _ ---41 411 411 Wells.N.II �•//1- _ I I I it. 4N p•411• I_—.. t,r �, ___ I J I ,1yJ1YaM1 i - i s 91ADNG,9 +��K a'� , it I . _ �, _ ., 12, it71.d .1/4 C. 1 41 ,( c- I 1 i"/ s�,■ Icy / �. _ —_,I ,� 111 . _. - TJI> 1' /Disc rf. �AAS[7A i! .-_- .t 4 Ihi i . 1 S. P. A 1 J I - ' 'lunar 1S I II/1DM v - Z • *��t!�. �. --.-=a,•za Dr o gym. _ . It ..� __ =i,��M ., — f>�„r („ F VICINITY'MAP E 12 .j . lS .i �woc`Nv�n I t i II -.^ �.��_'� . ,6.�� s---a1.r•mw./1/.�. . ...�/.` .�� oaaTvua�'LT �gei.rl44.: r._ s 1001r•ID-Iw.4.141 . I 10e..lfnwYlt+Y "Ind...)" q�j••. — — — — -i� — -- POWELL AVE.S.W. -- - 9 f }-'-jam• {- . SITE PLANI 'o 5 GENERAL NOTES 13 A-1 • n e Irs 1r) w THE - o MAEHLUM ~ ---7C1 IG.• ® - r f. c T - - ARCHITECTS (i) t Ia ;ram .e . i t tV1hWlr •UhlAIZIMhNI/U1V151UN : 7r APPROVED 'At-. ..OVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED 1 r, • I • i I Ra&_, t, DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Fo rm 182 .. - REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : t47L tT4/ 4-Aftci 66.e.oils p ® APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED lJ UTILITY APPROVAL SiiiiiLCi i . IC-COMERS COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER N® t. • WE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER NJo SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • WATER . p'<• } Q, 04 k$,AT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE • SEWER yEs. ' /'•04 is-§.Pr. 1 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • WATER Ntj p SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE • SEWER NO � ' APPROVED WATER PLANES �� JS i APPROVED SEWER PLAN Yg-s- ^ , APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS BY FIRE DEPT. Y6-S FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS fil /�C �6,.. _ 1 f I DATE: /!- - I - V3 SIGNATURE 0% DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 i KtV1tW1IVV UtrAIiIM I1I/U1V1sjuIN : / oaf f/L 1--1-12/ue�r-?u; ", . 0 APPROVED - 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS .. ® NOT APPROVED ti i li jeL-1 ---- G ) i 1.\' DATE; /�/ "�> . - i SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 [=1 APPROVED AI OVED WITH CONDITIONS DNOT APPROVED ' R ' ' -----NV 5 740,e P744// k ye$h#i .v�. , 400 r'eyu remei 4r ®ffC t e ea 05e o'l ren e‘7 , , /1Lwfl, DATE: 1(,/SIGNATUREOF DIRECTOR OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 , i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: X , APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED i P ! 1 1 <��r 4%;7l� -- -- DATE: / 2 - (5 SIGNATtU>5rDIRECTOR OR AUT 0 ZED REPRESENTATIVE i. REVISION 5/1982 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /e i DAPPROVED UAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ❑ NOT APPROVED . 7 !, �,�7A1Z- AJAiT Sc%.1iYil;5• ,¢it; 41,7,-.� �/o,C) L:.),97-Er (/T/�/%f/ s�L )A li /r�2 cam=/c:,Z ,0�.'. cSi"TE fl./,� Jic.cJ7'4,ll i%x- //ec-,T- c '7 U,✓. 0_ /4ge cS-J' /2o.e2f'f,`l4/,s � a-44- /-3r/Ac�� •.Z^ i c, ;,cic- / /00re rr/ 43E I . A2 -Xix- 0 T/f''c.-'C/6 jd /=-i`f/.1 J ,.T - "ram /1//0/41 t'41 S:A x40,4 2..b,5 J • l r eG2� DATE: A.- / 2 SI ATURE-- Ff- RE TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 ' 0 ENGINEERING DIVI )N ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ® FIR.E PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED [1] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED )4tJl�e DATE: , c, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPR SENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; , ' PROVED [I] APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED DATE: / �9t �.,� 5IGNATUR' OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1082 1 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): SA-081-83 Environmental Checklist No.: ECF-071-83 Description of Proposal: Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing. Proponent: Holvick, deRegt, Koering Location of Proposal: Located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. Lead Agency: City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 7, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, James Matthew, David Clemens, James Hanson, Gary Norris and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-071-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Loren Davis, DATED November 1.4, 1983. 2. Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-081-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Fire Prevention Buearu, Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Building and Zoning Department, Police Department, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division, and Utility Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was Made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject development will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and the following requirement shall be complied with: 1. Access roadways from Phase I to the north are to be extended through Phase II to minimum standards of design required by the Fire Code. SIGNATURES: t it/&-e/ 7 R nald G. Nelson David R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Rioa gnd C. Houghton Public Works Directo PUBLISHED: December 12, 1983 APPEAL DATE: December 26, 1983 - • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 _ 83 APPLICATION No(s) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT: HOLVICK DE REGT KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINi'ON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE STORY TILT UP CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND 1 7.110 STORY '1'1L'r up WM. . BLDG. YOH A 'J.'UrAL Ur' b b,O U U be 2. FT. OF BLDGS. ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK & LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION: APPROXIMATELY THE800 BLOCK OF POWF.T,T, AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : 66,000 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : - IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : X 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X 3) Water & Water Courses : X 4) Plant Life: X 5) Animal Life: X 6) Noise: X 7) Light & Glare: X 8) Land Use; North: WAREHOUSE/OFFICE East : WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL PARK South: UNDEvEmpED West : UNDEVELOPED Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPATED 9) Natural Resources : X 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : X 13) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 263 TRIP ENDS (1.363 100% OFFICE-WORST CASE) Traffic Impacts : 'SECTIONS OF S,W. 7th & HARD E AVE. SW GRADY & I;OWELL A\ 14) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X r 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : Ronald G. Nelson aid I Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director /� C - PUBLISHED: DEC. 12, 1983 Richard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE DEC. 26, 1983 Public Works Director 6-83 ERC-06 FORM #7 { NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON JANUARY 10, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING (WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A) Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing, file SA-081-83; property located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. MAMIE SWALES (ECF-054-83) Application to rezone ± 1.3 acres of property from R-1 to L-1 for future light industrial development, file R-062-83; property located at 1307 Maple Avenue S.W. and 325 S.W. 13th Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JANUARY 10, 1984, AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : December 30, 1983 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I, JEANETTE SAMEK, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in the King County, on the 30th day of De ember, 1983. _ 3_&Jet-. SIGNED: (,v`k OF RE IN ciTicE , ,Ci 0 6p Z co. % E'D SEPSS.M�Q . City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will hold 'a. ,': PUB IC 111 . • .. . in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL ON - JAiJllARY 10, 1984 . . BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. _ 'P.M.. CONCERNING: .FILE SA-081-83 7. REZONE From "To ' . SPECIAL ICONDITIQNAL USE PERMIT To A I I SITE APPROVAL ' ,PLAT/SUBDIVI,SION ,of Lot SHORT , ____ PLANNED UNIT. DEVELOPMENT ' VARIANCE FROM . , ', 7 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR . ADDRESS: L, LOCATED AT APPROXI114TELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT. ' ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION, E] SIGNIFICANT lig NON-SIGNIFICANT ' , : FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 'THE CITY ' OF RENTON BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT . .TO BE REMOVED WITHOU'1 /= '4.' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF 071 _ 83 APPLICATION No(s) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT: HOLVICK DE REGT KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE STORY TILT UP CONCRETE BUILDINGS AND 1 TWO STORY 'Till!' Ur UUNL; .13LUL4. rUK A TOTAL Ur b6,000 5t . FT. OF BLDGS. ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK & LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION: APPROXINA'1ELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S S.W. SITE AREA: 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (Gross) : 66,000 SQ. FT. DEVELOPMENT COVERAGE (%) : - IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1) Topographic Changes : , X 2) Direct/Indirect Air Quality: X 3) Water & Water Courses : X 4) Plant Life: X 5) Animal Life : X 6) Noise: X • 7) Light & Glare: X 8) Land Use; North: WAREHOUSE/OFFICE East : WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL PARK South: UNDEVELOPED West : UNDEVELOPED Land Use Conflicts : MINOR View Obstruction: NONE ANTICIPATED) 9) Natural Resources : X • 10) Risk of Upset : X 11) Population/Employment : X 12) Number of Dwellings : X 13 ) Trip Ends ( ITE) : 263 TRIP ENDS (1,363 100% OFFICE WORST CASE) Traffic Impacts : -INTESECTIONS OF S.W. 7th & HARDIE AVE. SW GRADY & )0[WWELL AN 14 ) Public Services : X 15) Energy: X 16) Utilities : X 17) Human Health: X 18) Aesthetics : X 19) Recreation: X 20) Archeology/History: X Signatures : , e7. Ronald G. Nelson vid . Clemens Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director 1;!-44,L0(il- • PUBLISHED: DEC. 12, 1983 Richard C. Houghto APPEAL DATE:EC. 26, 1983 Public Works Director 6-83 ERC-06 FORM #7 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s): SA-081-83 Environmental Checklist No.: ECF-071-83 Description of Proposal: Application/for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing. Proponent: Holvick, deRegt, Koering Location of Proposal: Located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. Lead Agency: ,.City of Renton Building and Zoning Department This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on December 7, 1983, following a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: Roger Blaylock, Ronald Nelson, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, James Matthew, David Clemens, James Hanson, Gary Norris and Jerry Lind. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-071-83 are the following: 1. Environmental Checklist Review, prepared by: Loren Davis, DATED November 14, 1983. 2. Applications: Site Plan Approval (SA-081-83). 3. Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Fire Prevention Buearu, Policy Development Department, Parks and Recreation Department, Building and Zoning Department, Police Department, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering Division, and Utility Engineering Division. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this development does not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: The subject development will not adversely impact the environment or adjacent properties and the following requirement shall be complied with: 1. Access roadways from Phase I to the north are to be extended through Phase II to minimum standards of design required by the Fire Code. SIGNATURES: it104 R nald G. Nelson avid R. Clemens Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ri and C. Houghton Public Works Directo PUBLISHED: December 12, 1983 APPEAL DATE: December 26, 1983 BEN'- 'I BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. ( Q(k { 1„ I') r • TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ® APPROVED LI APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED ✓ � DATE: at-i t f Y3 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR A THORIZED REPR;;SENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 r r,. REN' 'I BUILDING & ZONING DEP rMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL. BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 El ENGINEERING DIVISION Ej TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 ❑ UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION fl FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT fl POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT lOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1 ' PROVED 0 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED /1' DATE: 10? SIGNATURE OF DIR OR OR AUTHORIZED REP/d°W14"1.. - RESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1882 REN' J BUILDING & ZONING DEP fMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE: WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FORA TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 ENGINEERING DIVISION Ei TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 1-17-84 OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : j2DAPPROVED APPROVED WITH C'NDITIONS NOT APPROVED 40, DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN1 BUILDING & ZONING DEN 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET EC F - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL_ BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 ri UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION [=1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ri BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : • COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : l/T/G tl 4-A/FlifE0�,,04/,6 0 APPROVED OAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS fNOT APPROVED I UTILITY APPROVAL S IB/LL,i l 1 L-COMERS AGREEMENT • WATER LATE COMERS AGREEMENT • SEWER /Y1 I. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - WATER ,gg' 50, (1¢/S'g.AT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE - SEWER VC- .Q¢ /5Z.p7-• SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - WATER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE - SEWER A/a rb / �1 �' APPROVED WATER PLAN v' r N-� APPROVED SEWER PLAN l , APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS • BY FIRE DEPT. , ye:5 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS moccS ,//_ DATE: 51.3 SIGNATURE 0 DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1882 P BEN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE. 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 El ENGINEERING DIVISION ISTRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /. a � E-/42«ee.�'1��p OAPPROVED I APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED ) DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZ�PRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 • - RENT- I BUILDING & ZONING DEP !WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET CITY OF RENTON ECF - 071 - 83 NOV 3 0 1983 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 DEVELOPMENT DEPT. PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 12-7-83 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION Ei TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION E] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M, ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /iCkY tPPVcLOPIrie. er APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED 74.0,e PAL r kept, 604•Vio•gr 474,romp relliireMegis r7 Nive0,40eni, 4;40,494•‘.4A-i DATE: (47/ O 3 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN' l BUILDING & ZONING DEPOrMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION- NO(S) : SA-081-83 PROPONENT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO: 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12-7-83 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 El UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE . PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Ei POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:J;Z Lf) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED DATE: /2 - ✓17) SIGNATUR IRECTOR OR AU ZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 REN' I BUILDING & ZONING DEP FMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REMI y=1/ SDI T ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-081-83 Nov_, 3 0 1983. PROPONENT: HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE : WASHINGINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER = PHASE 2A BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC.BLDGS AND 1 TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG.' FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BUILDINGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITEWHICH WILL BE USED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LIGHT WAREHOUSING. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE .800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. TO: El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12-7-83 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 1-17-84 0 UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION �/ FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU Ei PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT EI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 0 OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 6, 1983 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /2E El APPROVED 5 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED 4j�2, t ..,„./P 6-da.Yi715- .OA) ,41•='i-'2od,G6f7 1.)•97- r e/T/c_i'y s�.e .c� A-%ve c ."E'er , ez 57 7 /¢-/vO .t."-el.., /AD 6 1�Y/4"B f�/jo7 c-77 U Z_ .4C/e T--r /0-O•e06,7�.s s i=eo,e-4. .,k7i ASc To Tr/cc /0027w 43E . -)1: , -,) ?/jeo l/!/,f /ci44i2.4 • ..J -- 70 44//..)7/i4/IAA ,A.4'OArla.e7S or ,air' ) ' i '�,o a y r/-g �i�. Gvet �/ D ��l�� SI TEE E TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1882 66 I TON BUILDING k ZONING )ARTIMENT f • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 068 - 83 APPLICATION NO(S) : PRELIMINARY PLAT (PP-074-83) , PRELIMINARY PUD (PPUD-075-83) PROPONENT: CASCADE PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CORP,/SEA-VAN PROPERTIES PROJECT TITLE : REPLAT OF CEDAR RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PUD APPROVAL TO REDESIGN AND REPLAT CEDAR RIDGE RESIDENTIAL PARK FROM A MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED ENVIRON- MENT TO A NELGHB9RHQ0D OF SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES TOTALING 138 UNITS, LOCATION: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1800 LAKE YOUNGS WAY S.E. TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 11-16-83 J'ENGINEERING DIVISION IITRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: 1: UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION E] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU FJPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT OPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FJOTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 15, 1983 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : a APPROVED FA APPROVED WITH CONDITIONSNOT APPROVED Praviler de4 r �.�,� s .7 Z) Pva✓• ct 3) J k v r 1 C�o c 4.v 6-.- e4 s 14 °4.i1"J a `"" (J'aD GY Yrt,i - <S '7 7rg/i /4 DATE: Afbil'-•' fieI3 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 'PcJL iDet Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - • 83 CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 NOV 3 01983 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING POLICY . DEVELOPMENT DEFT. PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED I-OR A BUSINESS PARK AND I-UK Lth l WARIuusniu. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA : 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. • DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : L� 4) Plant life : 1/- 5 ) Animal life : . 6) Noise: 7 ) Light & glare : 8) Land. Use ; north : Ofrvrfwa,rp d.g lf east : Wa i•gt tiou iitddd,'t►1 r4 r� south : 1 eyllOr west : If Land use ' conflicts : View obstruction : L/ 9) Natural resources : • �/� 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : (� 12 ) Number of Dwellings : !/ 13 ) Trip ends ( I T E ) : 1.9 ,a AtT f LgSpMI t Ap;b a ee - t� traffic impacts : . J \ -: 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : So • 16) Utilities : 17 ) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation : /v 20) Archeology/history : !/ COMMENTS : /,AA /1cinf?-OSg3 COrnvio�l�rve a cr s- .c, . ck ,iejs ei/o/o dir' ,i i h 11 i7 o�'f M /I19f�• t¢io»6 7 %im posed/b y 11.4? i �. i vt fi. o, i .1 .s1 i4. ,7� 4.7s: Q re,` • Recommendation : DNSI v DOS More Information �• Reviewed by : c$4de "Hie" Title : ifjf itret 1'e Date : /c9/414e FORM: ERC-06 r bvILOWC4 Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FOR- A BUSINESS P7{RK AND I-UK Libm KAKtffUtrAnb. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA : 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 11( 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) • Plant life : 5) Animal life: 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use • conflicts : View obstruction : . • 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : ./1( 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : • 15 ) Energy : , 16) Utilities: 17 ) Hum'an health : 18) Aesthetics:. 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : NS.I x DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : In - Title : Date : p FORM: ERC-06 ? w d4 . Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIIRONMIENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEV SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A 4.3 ACRE SITE WHICH WILL BE USED FUR A BUSINESS PAA ANU FUK L1GHl WAKtHUUSiNU. LOCATION: APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA : 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (o) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE _ INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4 ) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north : east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services: 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17 ) ,Human health: 18) Aesthetics: 19) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSIY— DOS More Information Reviewed by : 12 45 t`- VA_ Title : ' X Date : (o r FORM: ERC-06 ehrialljgelti • Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENV/IRONfMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIIEY SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No(s) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING ' PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A . CRE SITE W IC . LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA : 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : !� 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 1` 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : . 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : " I 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities: 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : • 20 ) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSIX DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : T itle : Date : /2-,/2- FORM: ERC-06 TR APFic V Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL ENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A . CR SI E IC 1 OSED FOR A BUSINESS PARK AND FOR LthHi WRRtffuurs rb. LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA : 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : t 7) Light & glare : 8 ) Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings :, �1 13) Trip ends ( I T E ) : ;-Z 6,3 72,tat) 7ririlha,.. e traffic impacts : --rna// aczu .iiiu/af/..;e eJ a?1,44k) ^ 14) Public services : P /- �s��ae 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health : 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : C/ COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI_ G DOS More Information_ Reviewed by : e/,:_ks- Title : frev ,5-7- Date : I A/�" P., FORM: ERC-06 • j. fc)L1 Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIRONMENITAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET E C F - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE:. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A . CR SI W C 1 . LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA : 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross ) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life : 6) Noise : 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : • - 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15) Energy : 16) Utilities: 17 ) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : 19 ) Recreation : 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by : Title : Date : /A FORM: ERC-06 h-f 1 • Date circulated : NOVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 . ENIVIRONMENTAL CHEECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FOR A TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. ,OF BLDGS ON A CR SIT W C LOCATION : . APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA: 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : v/ 4) Plant life : r/ 5 ) Animal life : // 6) Noise : J 7) Light & glare : 8) Land Use ; north: east : south : west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) . Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 1 f 15 ) Energy : 16 ) Utilities : 17) Human health : /✓ 18) Aesthetics : ✓ • 19) Recreation :. . 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendation : 0 0DOS_ More Information Reviewed by : Title : an.../Ty 4-A/6/A!• R/Atero Date : /?_ — . 1 — 473 FORM: ERC-06 • Date circulated : NuVEMBER 30, 1983 Comments due : DECEMBER 6, 1983 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIKLIST REVIEW SHEET ECF - 071 - 83 APPLICATION No (s ) . SA-081-83 PROPONENT : HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING PROJECT TITLE :. WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER -PHASE 2A Brief Description of Project : APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT 3 ONE-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDGS AND 1TWO-STORY TILT-UP CONC. BLDG. FORA TOTAL OF 66,000 SQ.FT. OF BLDGS ON A . CR SI E W IC . LOCATION : APPROXIMATELY THE 800 BLOCK OF POWELL AVENUE S.W. SITE AREA : 4.3 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross) 66,000 SQ.FT. DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) : IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE INFO 1 ) Topographic changes : , 2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : 3) Water & water courses : 4) Plant life : 5 ) Animal life: 6) Noise : 7) Light. & glare : 8) . Land Use ; north: east : south: west : Land use conflicts : View obstruction : 9) Natural resources : 10 ) Risk of upset : 11 ) Population/Employment : 12 ) Number of Dwellings : 13 ) Trip ends ( ITE) : traffic impacts : 14) Public services : 15 ) Energy : 16) Utilities : 17) Human health: 18) Aesthetics : 19) Recreation: 20) Archeology/history : COMMENTS : Recommendatio DNSI DOS More Information Reviewed by . Iitle : �%!� Date : /a —/—. 83 FORM: ERC-06 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following projects: CASCADE PACIFIC DEV. CORP./SEA-VAN PROPERTIES (ECF-068-83) Application for preliminary plat, file PP-074-83, and PUD approval to redesign and replat Cedar Ridge residential park from a multi-family attached environment to a neighborhood of single family detached homes totalling 138 units, file PPUD-075-83; property located at 1800 Lake Youngs Way S.E. SHOEM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ECF-069-83) Application for site plan approval to allow construction of a five story office building having 13,440 square feet of usable office space, file SA-078-83, and variance from Section 4-712A(b) to allow building height to exceed thirty-five (35) feet, file V-079-83; property located at 1420 Maple Avenue S.W. HOLVICK, deREGT, KOERING (WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER - PHASE 2A)(ECF-071-83) Application for site plan approval to allow construction of three one-story tilt-up concrete buildings and one two-story tilt-up concrete building for a total of 66,000 square feet on a 4.3 acre site which will be used for a business park and light warehousing, file SA-081-83; property located at approximately the 800 block of Powell Avenue S.W. D & D FLOOR COVERING (ECF-074-83) Application for building permit to allow construction of a building having 9,126 square feet to be used for retail/office and warehouse use, file B-302; property located at 345 Union Avenue N.E. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by December 26, 1983. Published: December 12, 1983 i • • ENVIRONMENTAL .4 • • L . APPLICATION NO. FILE ;SA-081-83 .. • PROPOSED ACTION APPI I CATI ON-FOR SITE P1 AN.APPROVAI TO Al IOW CONSTRI CCT ION OF THREE ONE STORY TILT UP CONCRETE BUILDINGS'AND 4NF� TWO,STORY TUT t1P C.DNCRFTF BUILDING-FOR A'TOTAL,OF 66,000 SQ. FT. 'TO FBE USED FOR A BUS.. PARK AND I T. WARFHOI IS I NG. GENERAL LOCATION 'AND OR. ADDRESS LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY-THE 800 BLOCK OF'POWELL AVENIF S.W. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF ;AN. ENVIRONMENTAL 'ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE I E.'R.C. ] HAS . DETERMINED THAT THE ". PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES 1 I4DDES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE,: j IMPACT ` ON THE ENVIRONMENT. , AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, STATEMENT • ❑WILLWILL NOT {;BE REQUIRED. • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE 'DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE " RENTON HEARING' EXAMINER • BY 5:00 P.M., 'DECEMBER 26, 1983 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT ' THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING S. ZONING DEPARTMENT . 235-2550 • DO NOT REMOVE THIS: r NOTICE r. WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' fraet-SIS EA • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTONRENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM __° 9 ' ,p A-01. NOV 141933 • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BUi�_i�ifliG/ifE[�:E"u I i)E.Fi . Application No. 5/Q OF/ _ Environmental Checklist No. cTC/— 67442 PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance - ® Declaration of•Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • - • • • • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- • vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you. are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply., just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM . I.' , BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent //c,/vicl Q/€ £?1-/- g7' �. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 72 LD i �i A , Ss Oa fire /°d J©o tired ?P 3. Date Checklist submitted /4.X/CIVf yjkQ,/- , ie5 4. Agency requiring Checklist pT• 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: • • 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and na ure) : �� 1 i droll cxte. - 'TiN 90 CbI1C .ho/Ids s t - - gçc .r1L . a__ laird I_ a 0- V 7, iret( .•' .;ems [= i• • A/ ad / . & . P 0 . 1/'W!' are_ C?mp6 sp0"9;;Ia.ti 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the enwwiron- mental setting of the proposal ) : _71e izildiA6s are, ierstivd lit a& exis/7 busiite 0 €► ; headzS / . Tke sor-,ate, /S gi ss cavern. PLApjm. a o_ /to 5aM L i, " Imes d� Sif� 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : F Sur'rrier— l961 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : riCeid Cyr/-- if.d COO //ZS i/di / 7oti i ! ,ca ! / rfn E kc al fri / � � �+.' . C. d & . 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Yes Y . Ac dikr5krxl o ' G. l occur K.ti.l • `)01 .11k13Ea le s, 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: /Ja 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: g. /L1611-0_, II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? Y€s- MAYBE N0' (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- - covering of the soil? E MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? 4- MAYBE my- (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? Vrf- MITE ZC''" (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream *or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or. lake? PEA- MAYBE' 6" Explanation: •t1 • t `- _/ o Cab a f ,.2: L�l !, 4 win - ,c (0 . . - (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: ' • (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . ' . . •WI' MAYBE N (b) The creation of objectionable odors? Yt MAYBE tg— (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture'or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? /1, - YES MYBEE it Explanation: • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: . (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of �' water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO • (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? MomTTE_ R-- , . i)c (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?. YES um- NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? Yam— FORTE (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in. any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? Y1 MAYBE N (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE O . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through ' interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through . direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YBr MAC O (i ) Reduction in the amount Of water otherwise available for public water supplies? • dMAYBE Air Explanation: (h)n dra4 ,(>,0,, �� /l// be. ems` �{ . V . Normal 'kI d cc ° 'will ccor (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops microflora and aquatic plants)? AAYB€ Ate • -(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or • endangered species of flora? vrr' MAYBE itIC . (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or , in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing . species? Vgr MAYBE AU— (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YET MIAY B E . Explanation,: @ P4(/ � � ii v//(a.)& i , ( ) d 1c ire -;cam r.A.D%// ; d' , ,c(cY o�.-', - :TY OF RENTC , '. FILE NO(S): .S4"-D a J-83 G BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTM :NT ECF—o7/-e�3 ♦ � � ♦ . NI MASTER APPLICATI ON. NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. - (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) ' APPLICANTTYPE OF APPLICATION N ME • , 101V/C.k. 1 46/ 4 Xcx r titl FEES ADDRESS CDREZONE*(FROM TO ) Z5 /9)021/ Ave,'S,GO, • d SPECIAL PERMIT* , C40.&,q0k ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT*N / 1I , � le0 C yQ� CONDITIONAL USE PPERMIT* TE PHONE ^ Y" J L�.I IT PLAN APPROVAL •525 //��,�� //��/,��+ //�� m• GRADING AND FILLING PERMIT L rat') 22 v-/2 G2 No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON 11 VARIANCE - From Section: . • * Justification Required NAME •� , Lori a+.vi S ADDRESS , ' SUBDIVISIONS: 725 f&/ /611 . 9.it.) . - Q SHORT PLAT ' CI ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT \/�4.8 C[C1/5 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE //�� Q FINAL PLAT ' (2-Ce.0) 22� /�G..'. 0 WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAM PLAT NAME: //olvick. cie&v / koe---1A3ADDRESS / i PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT:725' Powell Ave, . S•(.C.J. • ® PRELIMINARY 'CITYy /J�n / ZIP 0 FINAL gel /` t,Oa Y/j ,grii . 5 � TELEPHONE P.U.D. NAME: ... (2cx2) 22C0-/22.2 D Residential Q Industrial Commercial n Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS a AVG ISI / '�, , TENTATIVE E//XISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY • Ya..c .- - 4) , j - MP FINAL PROPOSED/�/� USE PARK NAME:, /ta..r-alcs� I LJ/ ..�`. �l�l�d l nas NUMBER OF SPACES: ��; c�: ;�i�> ' 699 f-/k 0bdsca,oi3ENVIRONMENTAL RE`IE%COkS °, �' `. ' AREA: J6�1 570 I ,¢i it?4L'° FiES:. ,- i3505 C 1. ct,fln B sus' K€C�e4il : IY�t USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING DATE s.� i?!.� �?, L€ ��P .€_�; LAPPLICATION RECEIVED BY: 56kv.C•W% IGYVNell-. NOV 14 1333 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: Accepted B€.1l G i D Incomplete , Notification Sent On By: - I� �. IiLi^d�, f.1E r{. (Initials) DATE ROUTED ` ADDITIONAL MATERIAL,RECEIVED BY: 1 ' 1 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: NOV.• J 0 - ? 0 Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: L1 Building Q Design Eng. ® Fire al Parks © Police 0 Policy Dev. I Traffic Eng. ® Utilities • RRUICIAW a/1On* rr Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). • • AFFIDAVIT I, Cr.t' J , being duly sworn, declare that I am C orized representative to act for the property owner,[Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS \`k.• DAY OF 191'S . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT (Name of Notary:Public) 'ig iature of Owner) KA.)CL ONN-47-6\ (Address) S (Address) • , , .5:‹ (City) (State) (Zip) (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 �.. -.4__ .. .. ' .. (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes. in the diversity of species, or numbers of . . any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? Yrg- MAYBE 61' (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? VES RAM- NO • (c) . Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, • or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? - YET MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YEB M 1 BE NO' Explanation: • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 1V64.0 Leijcie a,clivr6 / [dCGLDr'. (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or • glare? • Y )f MAYBE Explanation: e, s 1IL4II. £frJ iI ! kjzt J • (8) Land Use. . Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YE•s MAYBE N Explanation: • • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? Y MMAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? E MAT IT- Explanation: Na. 4e-1 J"IC,E./A w;/( / L.'' C�►'!ll-Q &i/ 4 C,oei23x a �.J i , / , (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Y MAYBE N Explanation: • (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . YES MAYBE• 0 Explanation: • • • (12) Housing. Will the •proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? - • - Y " RAW N 0` Explanation: �, _ Edo( di//I 1161a 111.. ppo/c4b bd: • • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MITE . NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand • for new parking? YET MAYBE 0— (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? -YES- MAYBE W (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YOB MAYBE 4 (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?• Y€- MAYBE NU— (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, • bicyclists or pedestrians? / 1TE — MAY A- • Explanation: A. . „ At (2rS _ 4 �. _L ",L .� A 4__ prkI ,. �XIt . . S. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in 'a need for new or altered governmental services • in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NU— (b) Police protection? Y RTTET N- (c) Schools? YES . BE 4` (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? Y E MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES M NO • Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Xr. MA (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of.energy? A� c�,,...�' MAYBE A- Explanation: (b) Akti rice. 4:„ h ay-vice. I 404 h� , • (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power- or natural gas? Y NAM' 0— (b) Communications systems? E MA 0— (c) Water? ) _ YES MAYBE NO (d) Sewer or septic tanks? E um- • (e) , ,Storm water drainogc? 4— NPR— WU— (f) Solid waste and disposal? "'` ES MAYBE NO .Explanation: /l)r/'a b/emit ,4 --Cps �!I bp.a w/rod. J • • • (17) Human Health.• . Will the proposal result in the creation of • any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? y MAYBE RIX- Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?. ' T MAYBE Alg: Explanation: '• _ . , (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? V MAYBE Explanation: (20)' Archeolo ical/Historical . Will the proposal result in an , alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? Yes MAYBE 'k0' Explanation: • III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (signed) " (name printed) • } • City of Renton • Planning Department 5-76 • • S a �'a ",to 1tki) •�' �� • i �" • ' ' NOU 14. i9S3 ' . ' . • i ; • .. ,,.. • ''' `""-c„'{r Ire Fr 1. , a w r .:,�; I 5 - Y , f i 1.S•, %K. .�, • J ' • • • • • • • • :a Kim Lighting, Inc. . watl "^" --SUBSIDIARY OF • x s;wt„ ,., ...,'''' . . ''.."'....''-::' ' CORPORATION • —41 5, .' .� - 1 r;ir�i ,f„ ,Ftr+",1 -E ' a' .b rEwi l - " ,i�t' y;, ri ' it;.i' +,y/ a' .-_.__ ;f tu,s+'; i1{ • 40' -` Scope 38' 36' 1 34' 32' 30' 28' 26' 24' 22' 20' 18' 16' 14' 12' 10' EKG—Series 200 EKG—Series 100 EKG—Series 300 8' 6' 4' Phase II Phase I Phase III • 2' 175 Watt 250 Watt 400 Watt 250 Watt 400 Watt 1000 Watt Applications Pedestrian ways Collector and local roads Major roads and whiteways Plaza areas Intermediate commercial Large parking lots Parks Medium size parking lots Expressways Residential roads Security lighting Sports areas Small parking lots Residential roads Security lighting Kim Lighting, Inc. Building entrances Highways Automobile dealers Printed in U.S.A. - - CITY Of RENTON LLA. - 0/6-83 . ' - • .. F L1GAL 46SCR/PT/QN - . , . • • _ - . LOT / : THE NORTH /d6.00 FEET Of 1014 AND ALL Of LOTS Of +. • RENTON LOT UNE ADJUSTMENT 002-83 AS RECORDED IN /YING • •" • " a° .COUNTY RECORD 0f SURVEY YOL.34, PAGES.154 AHO 2544 UNDER.• -- • - RECORDING' NO 830/255OO8 i k. - ' LOT Z LOT G. of RENTOH LOT°L/NE AOJUST/15NT me-83 AS . " = • wx RECORDED /N M/NG COUNTY RECORD Of SURVEY VOL. 34 RAGES 154 - . AND 854,q• UNDER RECORDING N0. 830/25900?. EXCEPT THE NORTH Id6.LV 'FIT TI/EREOf. - .- l4PPROYALS j. :.., . • _ , - ' 1H/S. RECORD df.SURVEY HAS_aEfh' iWEPARED TO GOCU4fEN'A'LOT., • , • : , , . •• - • LINE REY/S/ON WITHIN TM' CI(Y L/h//T.S ! RENTON. ., - •. . .. . . EXAMINED AND APPROW THIS DAY Of `. • All /953 . - . . " .• • 0/RECTOR - DEPT., Or RIB QC WDR�S`S . . - - -. --•:,:. • EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS-DAY 0t' . AO. I983. T i.'>/. - t ;• •. BUILDING AND AL ti :..-, :' __ Y : ZON/NG Offl C. 1 A .n] • 11 • EXAM/NED AND APPROVED T7/f5 - l29Y IT Off/98,1 ` :`�h, •1... f ;;<. ,. , i yet "- i , f . 4Y/N6' C011NTY ASSESOR DEPUTY ASS£SsOR .. 1' POE NE4NE4 5EC P4, 7-43N, ,edE, IVA ' ' . - • `- ''/NG .0 2EJNTY, e4 4.5lI/NG7ON . • $, 845/.S OF BEAR/A 6 • CITE.�dtl t� Ou l ��+ Fd7 .ev- ,ouivGovTfuc ® 4 . L ° . ; iYS G C N/ DL ; �- y .. l?� - - - i-,. : CE/JTE,Q , NOL /1 t, PG5 Pd- /DZ. �PECO,QD5 Of .e/,VG co A4..os ' - NOV 14 9 S 3 a • //O jE: 71//5 12PDK'/A/G 5.z/OX.5 LOT • z./A/E" .PEV/.S/Oti O.VL Y olvo • . - ' st- '"la E45EMEA{/T.S x' ...."" II . 0 0/ '1 LOT 4 I f--. LOT 3FUTURE ! ! —-„-__-_-_----, (111 1,:-.. --- v% • - _F.' I E . T. - t" 1 , i , ,_ . / 1 .'/ i CI r HI /4 LOT 1 .. ---i-1- S.W. SEVENTH ST. ----N. .. ,:- -6---- —y- I: J ___ 1 mr III 'Cr i \ \ EI \_.1) , G existing ... earlington Industrial parkil:1".'III ' by burlington northern u) C ir--i J it 2 0 i . \--1 J Tr, ; tEZEM:' r ISM L12_11 PHASE 2A gum 1 1 4..,:gp,:;• .k. . . 1 . CDA , _—_—_.t • Ui: V _ 11 . r rr .J1 TU WILA ' ; CENTER IL 1 VlOWITY MAP CITY OF RENTON ti i' N lii) F;i1 11 Iv!' rg rip • i N 0 V 1 4 1983 .--- ......-----' DEFT. _---- __ -_-__---- ....--)/ __---------- 7 to scoP" 0 •-- --- - FEET INIII.161..e... 0 Gi> ' o 100 200 300 P R O I E C T - LLIA".51-11LICni-Oki E.-.TATE.. TE.CHNICAL- C.E.1-1TE_R THE JOB NO. -- !AB". MAEHLUM DATE 111.71;_e9_, GROUP DETAIL vic rim- MAF - .\RCHITECTS 5CALE !"•-...?od-0" SHEET I:0F i " ' • • •0 .• .. TY, • ., , • . „ • • #ee°5s'al- I9 .I; -. • ..1..".4., .•.4.....4 S.P4' " . . .•,. .• •• 0.f. ,'-.• ,...,,..-. .N, .8. 8..,..,.-..'4..1. .5•. • D"89!I,IB' P=lS.QO' ' -.' L=.lRO•S' . ....‘t4',•tt,t).. •.. .: .-. ..•,-,.I.-...,-., • v • dYl• • EXIST REAM w/CDP. , _� -� 4L' .� g EX/6T,�4 LO. `- 1 = fi - 6V/J,U/1vE,e. bOO N645'45.32 31Y • I �� - f , .,,+ , • • $ rV .LOT f ' • • • ,, - �, h • • OR/6/NAL LOT U/YE •. - el - w ._ . _. . _ �_ �.s , '` b •: :r• !� • ' SET'££ede w/cam .Q �' • "T 9 • d�` OP l/NE.. v 4'4 ; A LOB. ? NIc • — ♦ w P` , , ' 1,i t6. LLL V C ' ITY OF RENT ` . BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE APPLICAT➢ON FEE APPEALS OF LAND-USE OR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS $ 75 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT $450 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW: Environmental Checklist Review/ Threshold Determination $ 55 if value less than $10, 000 $ 60 plus $1 per $10,000 if value greater t an $10, 000 Pre-Draft Consultation Report $100 plus $25 per acre Environmental Impact Statement, Draft and Final (Costs of Coordination and Review) $100 plus equivalent of City cost incurred Environmental sensitive land or lands covered by water 11 times the above listed fees GRADING AND FILLING PERMITS $300 plus $25 per acre LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS $ 50 MOBILE HOME PARKS: Tentative $150 plus $1 per acre Preliminary $300 plus $5 per lot Final $150 plus $2 . 50 per lot OPEN SPACE $ 30 PLATS: Short Plat , Residential/ $300 Commercial/Industrial $ 75 plus $1 per 1 ,000 square feet (not less than $175) Tentative Plat $150 plus $2 per acre Preliminary $300 plus $8 per lot Preliminary Industrial $600 plus $1 per 1 ,000 square feet of land area Final $225 plus $4 per lot Final Industrial $375 plus $10 per acre P.U.D. : Preliminary Plan $750 plus $20 per acre with $1 , 000 maximum Final Plan $750 plus $20 per acre REZONE $300 plus $10 per acre SHORELINE MANAGEMENT $100 if value is less than $50, 000 $150 if value from $50, 000 to $100, 000 $200 plus . 01 % of value over $100,000 ISITE APPROVAL $300 plus $ 5 per acre SPECIAL PERMIT/TEMPORARY PERMIT/ CONDITIONAL PERMIT $300 plus $10 per acre VARIANCE $ 75 if value is less than $2, 500 - $150 if $2, 500 or greater. WAIVER OF IMPROVEMENTS $ 75 I \ OFFILE FILE TITLE . . . . . . • .‘• .-" . . • .„ •