Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA00-053 Vol. 2 of 2 tT,f ctOr) - - • - 1.• • -"-;"' pLA •- -ktrOlAYVING ApR 0 zoo RECZ ETERSON CONSULTING ifrED ENGINEERS '..-UA. 0O . O L 3( rP, Eo ( 14) • HERITAGE PHILIP ARNOLD Preliminary Technical Information Report City of Renton April 10, 2000 Prepared for: Bennett Development Nine Lake Bellevue Dr. Suite 100-A Prepared by: Bellevue, WA 98005 Nicole McWlurter Reviewed by: . . . . Jennifer A. Stei P.E. 'O wo,-.. ` ly ET E RSO N . `�� ICONSULTING ,�� '� 2 °. ENGINEERS 88/ONAL ,sIh\`9\ 4O3O LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD.NE,SUITE 2O.0 EXPIRES SEPTEMBER OD, 2DD0 KIRKLAND,WASHINGTON 98033 PCE Job No. HERM-0025 City of Renton TECHNICAL INFORMATION REPORT (TIR) WORKSHEET ENGINEER':' ' = Project Owner: Bennett Development Project Name: • Address: Nine Lake Bellevue, Suite 100A Heritage Philip Arnold Bellevue, WA 98005 Location: Phone: (425) 646-4022 Township 23 NORTH Project Engineer: Jennifer A. Steiq, P.E. Range 5 EAST • Company: Peterson Consulting Engineers Section 20 Address: • 4030 Lake Washington Blvd NE • Suite 200, Kirkland, WA 98033 Phone: (425) 827-5874 :P*4 TYPE O. ,- ...-,�-,_,_�-a" - �,,., .t,.. . -::fw: ;;r a• r 'THEM � r�,,;_. EVI�'W `N :., ri: E SSA DP.�RMITS; ��.�='. :r. .. r.. ,�-fit v , . .. ..._ ,...r.-,1;:${:;,,,`,nT.'ki:.'..v..,t'C:'^f).1:..._,•.M .S`!/;:...•,-.:[.,wr. r...., 'V 41'.,.: , ® Subdivision ❑ DFW HPA El Shoreline Management El Short Subdivision ❑ COE 404 ❑ Rockery El Grading ❑ DOE Dam Safety ❑ Structural Vaults El Commercial ❑ FEMA Floodplain ❑ Other ❑ Other ❑ COE Wetlands SW I. E C.OMMt�NITY�AN�'I�i: 'lN _Community' Newcastle Community Planning Area Drainage Basin Lower Cedar River Sub-Basin/.Cedar River Basin . ..::.,1„ 4e:.i....rf-•, v ..s.. r_..+: �y.,2:"'L,�,'..'. ;;Yi: :1�: :`fJi•,' :.t:7�:• j. :..., n..r. ..i.. :.,,:..h.:.r }.r,:..r..�•'=;.n^,:.::..;.'::,- �t.. f�'1'x: ..4tr;fl.�t::. �A:n n .;::li::,i:.:. ...:. .:1.r.....�.�'-... i•7:" f ;P w6 5 t:�L :1 rk ITE:C- HA C:TERE 7_a :S i El River ❑ Floodplain ❑ Stream El Wetlands ❑ Critical Stream Reach ❑ Seeps/Springs ❑ Depressions/Swales El High Groundwater Table • ❑ Lake El Groundwater Recharge El Steep Slopes El Other .'Part:7:•-.SOILS;:;: - Soil Type Slopes Erosion Potential Erosive Velocities InC-Indianola • 4- 15 % Slight-Moderate AqC-Alderwood 6- 15 % Moderate ❑ Additional Sheets Attached MR:a .Y� d. rtDEVELOPMENT LIM`G` ffON` Y' 1.Zj� v,, . .,-..1.,,.-... .a.,... ......Ar;.Y '�.+..., ..,:,.......:2 .. ..n +r.+ 4 .,...... :. r•^)A x.,'.Y::�l:'.�?yn.. .... .....:.. ..v. ....,.......,f..! ,....:f.-....... .,_ - 1. J t.,- � re. Y. ,. 4 _.... .,.:�.',, .}": REFERENCE LIMITATION/SITE CONSTRAINT • ' ❑ Ch. 4—Downstream Analysis 0 • 0 • 0 ❑ Additional Sheets Attached > Q M 5 ^S, :5: '%:' 1. -J1 m `Ya'•1- �;t: MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM ESC REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION ® Sedimentation Facilities I Stabilize Exposed Surface ►/ Stabilized Construction Entrance ® Remove and Restore Temporary ESC Facilities ►Z/ Perimeter Runoff Control ►i/ Clean and Remove All Silt and.Debris • ❑ Clearing and Grading Restrictions ►/ Ensure Operation of Permanent Facilities ►5 Cover Practices ❑ Flag Limits of SAO and open space preservation Construction Sequence areas ❑ Other ElOther • 'Part:.10••:,SURFACE A/ViNTEIR: ySTEM • , :.; • El Grass Lined 0 Tank • El Infiltration Method of Analysis Channel El Vault El Depression KCRTS El Pipe System El Energy Dissapator 0 Flow Dispersal Compensation/Mitigation El Open Channel El Wetland 0 Waiver of Eliminated Site • Storage 0 Dry Pond 0 Stream El Regional Detention 0 Wet Pond Brief Description of System Operation: Conveyance of runoff to biofiltration swale for water quality and then to a infiltration pond. Facility Related Site Limitations Reference Facility Limitation • Part 11 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS ;„446rt'f.:;(2-ik:EA„ EIMENTS'.1:;TRAdTs „ ,424:,,,, ,,,v,,,, ,,,..: El Cast in Place Vault El Drainage Easement 0 Retaining Wall El Access Easement El Rockery> 4' High El Native Growth Protection Easement 0 Structural on Steep Slope Tract El Other El Other 101.43:1!.SIGNATURE I or a civil engineer under my supervision has visited the site. Actual site conditions as observed were incorporated into this worksheet and the attachments. To the best of my knowledge the information provided here is accurate. • lAft 't 411L400 Signed/Date TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 IL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY 4 III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS 6 TASK 1:STUDY DEFINJTTON&MAPS 6 TASK 2:RESOURCE REVIEW 6 TASK 3:FIELD INSPECTION 10 TASK 4:DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM SCREENING 11 IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 13 Existing Site Hydrology 13 Developed Site Hydrology 13 Facility Design 17 V.. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 22 VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES 22 VII.OTHER PERMITS 22 VIII.ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN 22 IX.BOND QUANTITIES,FACILITY SUMMARIES AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT 23 XI.OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL 23 Peterson Consulting Engineers Page i Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 FIGURES Figure 1: Vicinity Map 2 Figure 2: Site Map 5 Figure 3: USGS Map 7 Figure 4: SCS Soils Map 9 Figure 5: KC Level One Table 12 Figure 6: Existing Conditions Map 14 Figure 7: Developed Conditions Map 15 APPENDIX Lower Cedar River Sub-Basin Lower Cedar River Basin Map Reconnaissance Report NO. 13 • Sensitive Area Folio Maps (Landslide, Seismic, Erosion, Coalmine, Streams and 100-Year Floodp ains and Wetlands) Biofiltration Swale Worksheet 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual(KCSWDM) POCKET Downstream Map Peterson Consulting Engineers Page ii Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 I. PROJECT OVERVIEW Project: Heritage Philip Arnold PCE Job Number: HERM-0025 • Site Area: The site consists of 450,718 Square feet— 10.35 Acres. Site Location: The site is located within the City of Renton on the northwest corner of the intersection of Beacon Way SE, SE 7th Court, Jones Avenue South and South 7th Street 530-214t Avenue SE (see Figure 1: Vicinity Map on following page). More specifically, the site is located within Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. Existing Adjacent Development: Existing development adjacent to the site includes the following: North—Single Family Residential,Plat of River Ridge East-Undeveloped South-Single-family Residential, Plat of Falcon Ridge West—City of Seattle Cedar River Pipeline Easement Pre-developed Site Conditions: • The existing site runoff patterns are generally from the southeast to the northwest. The onsite slopes range from 6-30%, rolling with small rises and hollows located throughout the site. The existing site is undeveloped, with the exception of a gravel road near the southeast corner of the site. The ground cover consists of decidous and evergreen trees with an understory of ferns, blackberries and other low-growth vegetation. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 1 • AIRPORT WAY `' F ,FF` S ,Q ,,�y o S 2n d ST �� `ro 150 S 3rd ST v 8V. Z S 4th ST I oH SITE .,111 1, ii, PHIL lP ��,s Inlllpl ARNOLD AC ; PARK x II SW 16 th ' ST 1oz 1 167 v) o z. , / SP0 ET DR HERITAGE PHILIP ARNOLD 0FIGURE 1: VICINITY MAP SEC. 20, TWN. 23N, RGE. .5E ,N oLakeDWN. BY: DATE: JOB NO, P ETERSON on Blvd. . Suite 2 0 NEM 04/10/00 HERM-0025 CONSULTING .Kirkland,WA 98033 e� Tel(425)827-5874 CHKD. BY: SCALE: z0 G I -N E E R S Fax(425)822-7216 NEM NTS ' PAGE 2 J O Q Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 Post-developed Site Conditions: The proposal is to construct 56 lots with associated roads and utilities. (See Figure 2: Site Map,on Page 5). Runoff patterns from the developed site will be similar to the existing conditions. The runoff from the proposed roads will be conveyed via tightline system to a spill control strucute and biofiltration swale for water quality and then to the proposed infiltration facility. The runoff from the roof drains will be tightlined to individual lot infiltration facilities. See Section IV for a detailed discussion and calculations. Peterson Consulting Engineers - Page 3 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 II. CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY Core Requirement# 1:.Discharge at the Natural Location The proposed infiltration facility will act as the natural discharge for the project. Core Requirement#2: Off Site Analysis See Section III of this report. • Core requirement#3: Flow Control See Section IV of this report for detailed discussion and calculations. Core Requiremtn#4: Conveyance System The proposed conveyance system will collect and contain the stormwater from the site to the infiltration facility. Core Requirement#5: Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control In accordance with the City of Renton Standards, a temporary erosion control plan will be designed and provided at the time of preparation of the construction documents Special Requirement# 1:Other Adopted Area-Specific Requirements • The project is not designated in a critical drainage area or in an area included in an adopted master drainage plan, lake management plan or shared facility drainage plan. The project is located in the Cedar River Basin but is not subject to any specific requirements per the plan. Special Requirement#2:Floodplain/Floodway Delineation The project does not contain or located next to a stream,lake or wetland and therefore no flooplain or floodways will impact the site. Special Requirement#3: Flood Protection Facilities The project does not contain or located next to a stream, lake or wetland and therefore no flooplain or floodways will impact the site. Special Requirement#4: Source Control The proposed project is a subdivision and is not subject to this requirement. Special Requirement#5: Oil Control A spill control device will be provided upstream of the infiltaration facility to capture oil and/or floatable contaminants. • Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 4 SEC. 20, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. ',. ,., I I \.. ---,,. \ ----, p ETERSON I • ---,,...„... CONSULTING ....... \ I 1 T-r N -..., E. ET:. NA.E:..E:tin: I I /ij N. ----. \ ir -r 9 ,--,/ , I I I \ N. .., \ 4030 Lake Washington Blvd.N.E.,Suite 200 •____________-- .„,000-,isN'N.....• I RIVER RIDGE 1 1 VOL.7136330T-10f ..\\. ....-----, .."..,...„ Kirkland,WA 98033 1 I NN :•;7771411.1.,400•1111.1, -- ; ..1 --..,....\ Tel(425)827-5874 \• Fax(425)822-7216 -wrOligr•vor,4 , ., 34 simeimmillimomm st) • ., ,..... . (4 --.4 ::,A„, \ 0 41k ,,,,,,, STORMWA7ER 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 7RACT • .___„i 'KIS& e co ,..:.::.,.... 33 ,....0 ..--- .,;,;.,,,,:,,.... , •,„ _ , • s ' --: •- INC _ ' •,•..,.. . • , .•.: ...,• - , -.,.. : • ,,:, , .- - - .-- •. ...-. , • , .„.,...„:„ ..., ,N.,,, .:,.,., ,,,-,-,-....-,...•.•,::..• • .- ,.,,,,,,,,..:,..„::::', ., ROAD :.A .,:. :,....„,.. ,., . 58 . . „,,, .. •.....„. . ..„.,..,.. It . ..., .., .... ,.,.-. :..., • • ''';',,i.]::•:::4i::?..''7 e.::`;.,ic,';;;;:.:`-,i, 1 00' ' 0 1 00' : •-::',01:': V.:1!ZZ' Q. CX. 1... _ 1 mm I 4.,40. vAll,„ 4."'!..-.: q.c.N::,;:.,, ck, 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 • . 31 Z .... SCALE 1n = 100' . N.--__iiib, ::Nt:t3:-..c 'Z,-.V-` . • iC 111. • ITO •• 703"-V %I. Me 1 COS 10111 Afig' ::,. ,..,.....,.. 1 : ......... .7) .30 LII4 J v.,,g.t..4g,•;,\11.11,.........____ • ---- ' ,, ,....,•,, 1/41 I 's'55 54 53 52 29 61 o •!.-. I 'V. , ''':-. :"';:. 1.. .... ..... 0 SOO * • ......./ . ; ---1 le' ..-':;-,',:. : ".:3.e.1 cc 14 is. .-f.:-:';'.. .2';'.. -.,,-- , --77--- , :' 1 i IIIP- c:, ':-‘::;.4..::i:i.si?.±4:1451q: nVA:If?P.>:...P! ,._;.....,:;:.,. .. .::.:• .::--.`7.::::.::.::• .,,...,:: , )...- - f I ;- _1 I I t• 7 6' milleimellimMIS6 27 "<\ • 1 I 6 8 926 . 10 ii : :::.:..:,.,,;:...::::: .'i / 011114164."-% , - .. ,.,. ' ylOttp ----5--.-- _ _ ,::.. : 25 Fl N RID°gi .p.t.cc RiDG v...F., :,,,5,R ot ..... 15 14 12 .4. -1 ,.„ • .'. • -10 - 24 I a I--__---_---___ —I I CITY OF RENTON PHILIP ARNOLD PARK , \ % ' ''-, ' • \ 0 \ - -.0.11111-0T7. 7 H , 23 i I I \ ZIREFEY 57194 P.E PROJECT MANAGER:\ I. % g L/S IRACT\ r___ CADD. R.aRsar i. CHECRED. - • . 1 \ tb . (filll., 22 1 ----------- 1 FILE NAMED0HER25 r. \ . MESEEZEINMEESS ':. ' \ .....-. ) • , , 21 1--; I -1 . - \ --- , * f.: I \ 20 1 r----- . \ c,------ ' I .---------- \ Nc-----.. • ------- =..- • u) . ..---- N I . , c) , - „, ..----- w-- 3- • . S---- x UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED (.) "NumuRHERM-0025 FIGURE 2 CT. PAGE 5 ' tu immaimminimmonmaj • Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 III. OFF-SITE ANALYSIS TASK 1:STUDY AREA DEFINITION&MAPS The 10.35-acre site is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Beacon Way, SE 7th Court, Jones Avenue South and South 7h.Street in the City of Renton, Washington. More generally, the site is located in Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. in King County, Washington(see Figure 1: Vicinity Map on Page 2). The site is located in the Cedar River Drainage Basin, Lower Cedar River Sub-basin as defined in the King County Basin Reconnaissance Program Summary Volume II. The Lower Cedar River Basin Map and a portion of the Basin Reconnaissance Report NO. 13 have been provided in the Appendix. UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS There is no upstream area tributary to the site see Figure 3: USGS Map on Page 7. TASK 2:RESOURCE REVIEW Community Plan The site is located in the Newcastle Community Planning Area. Adopted Basin Plan/ asin Reconnaissance Summary Report The site is located in the Cedar River Basin, Lower'Cedar River Sub-basin Collection Point Area#2. Critical Dj rainage Area The site is not located in any of the Critical Drainage Areas as identified in the 1990 King County Surface Water Design Manual. - Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 6 IMIIIIII • k....,:,....-_._...,..-0_10-..,..d„4,---,•, .•‘,4....4.4.a.i 4,..::„ :70, 10 ]. 111 INt / Ai I A,-.zi7ef,ot,r--,•..,iv2...-.....,1..q.r..L..i.-.."-,*-4 4„)M,.y 6/1.,1 F0 i-- -;-k---. , High ?sr .k ilk, Paj,111,Park‘\ ,...... ,i,Lt14.:., ' • \r/ OBI li`: ; 111111111L1 . Sch W' A ". 1 ihk, 0 . .. e 4 ,-T ..67._ww.„..._.• 11:".11BkVillIglirtfilill".12"- As' '6-0 IlL V., ,--...,, , - A, /41.4 • •‘%•.., •.zi \N" -\\'' Illtillgin 4410, 1 A .." ":"11,Vmht,ENFI 1 1/00402. 44..h.:--_ ..,,, ,,:sa its• -•_/... .44 141Fpai.....-‘015,,,.c\.____%-..-_-_-,„ . A,,,i„,,,xlinumitim E-411 Ur INN _--- 1 ''--- \V - - '`:.'•',... q., i,Ainlielr/r:i ei el,111 ‘14 \ .°-.014\firigilh .,, ir stuio-sia 11 (OfMictiriai..".....101010,\Iaila pi., :_.4 0; , ---.-_--;,,--.-,-...tcrit,3•I' , i' .1-ramilltit .i.:dansil.,\Asimookb,11 • 11111 ‘1M1111111r- r"teN 42411111**-4, Anigiiwm-sh,"....x% 401l ,nRifilio,--Wt.i ttiank*As_ --cl,'; I. IL ak-SA 7.1 v .1 - .,.:.- .•••••• .•r 1 innift,-MICrn, W 1 .\'',\14 '.' '.. lir Mir k IlY* 3 til,ii. 111114‘4141,- o • XN, t•Or \--.1 sNek-\$ , 11W,?"- ' I AV: r.L.,1 :00.".Orfii:- :1"...=,'' , asp N. r c .. C4' 'Y'N•4 /4311 7, .ri":L leg 4,67,1*, ,r ilirl'e.i:11',...iii kril-t:-illit-Azzinar. ftrfir_illakir1§1114.4 la, 1114*%411ak-'461,1'4A,11 .,,,* • \ i ;, W I'''',Z. '" Ilt II 41 1-111-.1- • i_i • .• .: Ilk s IlLinkikr,,, ,- 4 • -?-, -',,._, T..1*.%.-A T 1 --... Taibilreq 1 413.,die ..st:•1`.-,Oil iENc" 11 7., \ IC It • I PArt ::., r -0.1 1 41111 2.„ Iltkit6Lii Eli... WWI ka,''ilillilik 0 11 i*Jimi ' .'"' ':X\lill -77.77,--7,71iliainnifi, tr IP 1 -\ 411111811 1 Ir f. 11: .*:i• `N % i',:i'4::'''', :`;719-.67)111re....ed\ 4 '''k''''' --. 0., • • iiiiiiqVr'::`'P' ::'''',;:i• '':'Wgi: M••',.1;; I,E.Arik a • _ ....... . , • v., 1 r `:,,. •1- -,(--"•/. .. ,...,.. , `'N:.;ii, , 4 4. '.'gee,L: t:-•14f,,t'c, ,CA.io , • . N. .:: ...,,, ,,,,,,,, . : :i \.: ._, „.,,:4,,,„,,,1 g 4,,,,,,,•,,,ks,,,,..,,,,,,t mi,‘,7,,,,x,, .1 , HERITAGE PHILIP ARNOLD FIGURE 3: USGS MAP SEC. 20, TWN. 23N, AGE. 5E 4.. - ca DWN. BY: DATE: JOB NO. tri ci 4030 Lake Washington pp ETERSON Blvd.NE.,Suite 200 NEM 04/10/00 HERM-0025 etZt I C ONSULTI N G Kirkland,WA 98033 Z 6 . Tel(425)827-5874 CHKD. BY: SCALE: '4 E- N G 1 N, E- E., R -S Fax(425)822-7216 NEM 1 D=2000' „ PAGE 7 634, — , Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 Sensitive Area Folio The King County Sensitive Areas maps did not reveal that the site was located in hazard areas, such as, landslide, erosion and seismic. The site has been designated in a coalmine hazard area. The site does not contain any classified wetlands or streams(See Appendix for maps). SCS Soil Survey The soils on the site, per the SCS Soils mapping, are InC-Indianola Loamy Fine Sand and AgC-Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam; see Figure 4: SCS Soils Map on page 9. Wetlands Inventory - • There are no classified wetlands on-site. iI — Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 8 • i r per sl I 1 { / 141 ,✓`NV Ill I , -"ri 1 _.- ••• �U� o\ 1 An p Park PcCGRA r BM 4.0'2,41 ., 1• e °� . -` o an IJ II IL1dr ' i Y : 4'\ t1. ..� C AkF 1 EvC -I AkF • h °° ° tee ` • I \700 •'' � `!-. ° `°R �:;°• °�,' ® III I '11 — sa Ur w �. 4 der - �:m°/;...i 4 ;6 /g O �, _v AM' 110....V.1.1 I��I�� ,/ °('.,' ° ', ^—Ur II /////1/ �'il•t[�y inc; •.I 1i ,�8 �,`\ • ° / �I "4„ / :yl .:"o �1 b 7 -' - AkF firs' �4 ista .,/,,,.� -71: ,n Am . :ram•;""J*-- .S- - _\\ AgC / Eall� e I .i o SubstaI A7iC' @ , r% ` '1' -- --�-_ `, L d20 i % AgD1 , ( '\''' '' ''°4:'. ! a B '. ` . .. ?Biv.. 455 \,., i1r :.\°. :°:i i ! :_.-.1.!0.1 • . 'i,-P,\,u—BeD:.T.,. s\‘,‘t /7._'_•It,--sT-i',.)...- 7 _: I L___.F__:_.'"r.;.3.2'.• °°p1©°°L..,, �°.6.W2.11.'1r 13—*.\—...\--II}® _— ,` r\ /r is.» �2 - `-- -^- . itIII° BeC .�`. /� l� /m lam- Lam\ '11q: 7r ,\.,"‘•,,.... -\ _A,,„,•,V,_1, __,— °II° IiN D t o ir AgC �� 1 I f ii • -..M r--ji____4(\_c ,[1[ I--j/f • ',: . ,„- rp:-. .• •,;‘, • ". 'T , 4° ABM 1? ). 16, I AgC II== ,I �N, • „\,Th • • HE! I TAGE PHILIP ARNOLD FIGURE 4: SCS SOILS MAP SEC. 20, TWN. 23N, RGE. 5E • h o DWN. BY: DATE: JOB NO. . 4030 Lake Washington '. k inP LT L RSA IN Blvd.N.E.,Suite 200 NEM 04/10/00 HERM—0025 i\ C®N S U LT 9 N G Kirkland,WA 98033 -.� - , .. CHKD. BY: SCALE: PAGE 9 i .E N•- G`14 N ESE R tS Tel(425)62T-5�74 • • ,�- Fax(425)822-7216 NEM 1"=2000' ta Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 TASK 3:FIELD INSPECTION A site visit was made on April 4, 2000, a cold,rainy day. The site is currently undeveloped; generally the site is covered with meadow and grass with deciduous and evergreen trees and slopes to the northwest at 6-15 percent. Runoff from the site and upstream area is tributary to the Cedar River. A request for drainage complaints was made to King County DDES in order to investigate past and/or present characteristics of the downstream path. The only complaint on record with the county was from 1985 (complaint# 85-1102) and has been closed for over 14 years. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 10 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 TASK 4:DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM SCREENING Please reference Figure 5: KC Level 1 Table on Page 12 and Downstream Map in pocket of report. Drainage from the site sheet flows to the northwest corner of the property (point A). From this point any runoff from the site would enter the existing 12" tightline system on the northwest side of Beacon Way SE (point B) approximately 120' from the property corner. This 12" tightline system continues to the northwest along Beacon Way South for approximately 400' before changing directions (point C), north, at the intersection of High Avenue South. The tightline system changes to the north at point D for approximately 260'. The pipe diameter increases from 12 to 18" at point E. The next catch basin contains the top connection for the HDPE outfall (point F). The HDPE pipe is approximately 485' in length and conveys the runoff aboveground over the steep slopes of Renton Hill to a Type II-72" SDMH (point G). The manhole contains a jailhouse opening for overflow. The runoff from the manhole is conveyed via a natural swale (point H), depth and width varying, to a large pond area. Due to the depth of water an outlet was not visible, from this point it was difficult to determine where the runoff was conveyed. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 11 . , OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE SURFACE WATER DESIGN MANUAL, CORE REQUIREMENT #2 Basin: Cedar River Subbasin Name: Lower Cedar River Subbasin Number: .SSq#010.1: `..., :':..,';;;.:::g:P11009 .;41:-.;': '..:.: 9!1'40000;•e,:: ::,A,-,iistoc::%pig:400-A::;;:%.,.topot„tot_i.-.44 p,00-.000.[:.-:::!: :.,:::020'00N.Atis0i7i$:of field:'.1:.,,,e'':::::!!;:'',0.-Oirijj49.100:04$%-p-o3,.., Component:::::-.,,:f1_,:?', k-'0% .;,g!fitoti..40:021t: , qp0001e0:i*i .,.1.7.,:;P.ii:citit00 ,:::: ' inspector, resource ::.': ::; •:Nanie-,::AraSite::':,.."':. !-E:::.‘::: 00i:CirptiOitz .7:::: ::,:,;:::::,:i. I''..'..-, itillsQtiOifge. ,:i. :::::,':';''' :.-.:::!;::..-...:-.-::: ::: ::::.'','....,::',-":'.,...:::;: reviewer, or resident . see Map ' Type::sheet flow,swale, ; -: drainage basin,vegetation, ;:•": ;- :',0/9: :",- y4,M1.=::1,;32Q:ft.',i!s: ::,constrictions,:under capacity;pending, tributary area,likelihood of problem, strearo,.4hapnej;:,plpe,, ;., , cover,0001;:yoq:pfiooil§ipp:-k *.: '.:A.. : :::: :-..:;;•-,:.- :::,:: :::: OVer.(900094000041.1bitat or organism:: : overflow pathways,potential :1.::...:PoriA'7840;:Zdiatinetef, :.', , .. ..:1'2. 01:00-i.iyojoro6.;.:',-;:. :.,,,.3- ;..,,, :,..! ;,:,.-4,., ',.. ,-;-i0-1,:','4:-.Y.c: :-: Cteit170.606*0(ifillg:::1*.tiK-t,iough,ihg;::::;:: ::„,:;. :::., :::: ' :impacts surface ifee---A?Z,";R`.k:',n;',.:Aq:;;;; :„V;i?-;‘-;.;R:?c.3.il ::,:f:, :;•'-?- . ,M,;::;CW-Z;g:&•ff'!c;;‘,7;.fiadfiiiiiiiitidliifi.diakiti,;'16.thefferdaiti4':',`;':: ::.fj,.;::: .•:: ::, :'. :'::.:::','.?::' , : .. ',:.. -: A Sheet Flow 6-30 0 None None No standing water observed on-site B 12" tightline system Within Beacon Way 5 120 None None SE C 12" tightline system To West side of High 5 620 None None , Ave. S D 12" tightline system North 5 745 None None E 18" tightline system 5 1005 None None F Top connection for 1115 HDPE pipe G Type 11-72" SDMH W/jailhouse opening 1600 None None 1/4 Mile point within this reach H Drainage Swale Width& depth varies 5-10 None None orl )•11 ' P ''' • ,.13 tra a Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 IV. FLOW CONTROL AND WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND DESIGN The calculations are based on the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) requirements; a variance will be applied for at the time of preparation of the construction documents. Verbal authorization was obtained from Neil Watts for the proposed design to be based on the 1998 manual instead of the 1990 manual. The proposed flow control facility will be an infiltration facility preceded by a biofiltration swale and a spill control device. Existing Site Hydrology See Figure 5: Existing Conditions Map on Page 14. The existing site runoff patterns are generally from the southeast to the northwest. The onsite slopes range from 6-30%, rolling with small rises and hollows located throughout the site. The existing site is undeveloped,with the exception of a gravel road near the southeast corner of the site. The ground cover consists of deciduous and evergreen trees with an understory of ferns, blackberries and other low- growth vegetation. The soils in the location of the infiltration facility are Indianola Loamy Fine Sand (InC), classified as outwash soils by Table 3.2.2.B in the 1998 KCSWDM. Developed Site Hydrology See Figure 6: Developed Conditions Map on Page 15. The proposed development of this site will consist of.56lots and approximately 2.13 acres road. . Runoff from the roadways will be conveyed in a closed pipe system to.the infiltration facility. The facility will be located within the Stormwater Tract.as indicated on the, Preliminary Plat. A biofiltration swale will be installed upstream of the detention facility. Runoff from the lots will be conveyed to individual lot infiltration trenches. Preliminary calculations for the infiltration trenches have not been completed; if the soils testing indicate that the soils on some of the lots are not suitable for infiltration the•runoff will be conveyed to the infiltration facility and resized accordingly. Peterson Consulting Engineers . Page 13 SEC. 20, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. i . / \ \ DETERSON I I • I I �� \ �� ICONSULTI� �rIllb.� ,-' RIVER RIDGE \ � ,- • ! J% _ I I 11 I voL.7153/99-101 \ 4Bly030 Lake,Suite 0 .,��- Blvd.N.E.,Suite 20 � � • / ( OD IMI i — tea,° � _ Kirkland,WA 9803 `� Iv �. i )/% =� / l` r` ., _ L�c^ _ Tel(42,5)827-5874 / 4 - ' cy 1`.-1 of---- ,..:Q) ,,--q, \ 0 ir' 4.7 \I (pi's': \,A — Fax(425)822 7216 . •, w. •.40 . i /op ;446) / , — , r \\-q v.." 1 ap` la-,_, Qri 'ea N \`rA).1.. -te• i/ Al -, --/'1-11id' / / ,- . , \ \ t---- -1_, , --7- v".. — Os '-.L'j\ 0 \ o i 1 \ 1... ' \ 0 / 1- _/ I? i -. , _ ( j% c) -1 '-, . r---- 6 0/ 70 alz•JrA \ QC) \ ' "•-• (x. y r 1 r f I \� ,, ,,. ..a„ ( '00 O 1 I 58 CC 4:t....0 CO SCALE: 1" = i oo� ( I �ilils� ` I /— \,, ' lQ 1 \\ ; / � i �, O/ ' : '-) 4'-1` \- 0 / 0 z I ♦may — —/ — — / / \ 1,r r ' � p - 0 J 14 Q !� \ �; Cb �( ;�jot. �\,\ 'EX/STING 3/TE AREA O \- -, \ ——-- • W �� \ \ � „� (` �``� \ ;0 •5ACRES vs i / �/ 3s , e?-vi / , Vi y� /�yy .. \ )0 -7.--._-__—_____,1 te, ---- _-.0' Ill ,-.. ///, eT \77 cskg 4(-70.___ - - fs ez-:' 1 ---„ -,--1,53 V.' 1 ` ..e.,... . ‘ -44' \loc/cr,,:pi f--,_ -3„--b--------------- ...\ --,-....*h 7 i 1 _.:- i , I • kit\,, I • t) 1/ / /i// .X.c., ( 4.feCO...-.. ---"" //-//,'-•• itid,l_ @ ,ii..N NI ) ___,it%,7 41,-- 4111111P-7_, , •-st...t,-•-..-..:::,..‘e _ ---...:-_-0,..."- et /r:c i), $ _. .-.::.......:::#. Jab \11) L‘ / LI 17:-. .41, ‘.....: . --------N--.-...e4e---_r,----c'-. ,i----_ ...„. _:_:o:.i_: /.. __---_------5,.,_._--.z,•-%----,'\Nm.c..,.,\ a_____*--_--/> --' -/ . • / t' * / a R, aa ,illo'I � &\Slgp c - 030 / �J, CITY OF RENTON / / Ii / ,p l r I � PHILIP \�� \ice oA i \ / � V I E \ _i I �W'• / 0 COL --a/ ••-...-- / (/S:::.,i �— zaaaaa aaaaa< ersammiafg • . , ) 6 I �__44t, 7�,�jj''� a \` _ ,' I ate, • • O2I7 / .--- 1 sr)�'^S X) .� n f.} CADD I I Ve 0 / �- I4k J�` \ ` - I —-- I DATE: ./e.00 I \ / ♦0. — / ,tom o -\ I ——f I \ A•' / \`, e\� I FRENAI�EtY _ \V V' —� T I I I Czi i i • C� Q g3 in I - Ns, \ —) k i 4,10 V I I I /- �� , u• / / �/ / S7'AbfPNGT'VAI.m 0 • / \ -,{'(� �\ \ / UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED L. F JOB N 'HERM-0025 et FIGURE B SEC. 20, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. imamomcmsmimi ) 1 `I /: ./ \`�I� \ �� n ETERSON I I 44, 1 �\ \ ULTIN s :35.00:7;411---orisuill"..4. ~ —t-� '` • . _ PROPOSED BIOPIC 7RA 170NN \ \ �'rielsolirriacc-..:-?' .-.' j _ SWALE N �,, F ''- \� 403e Lake82758 4/ ,- _ _ I , \ OL�R /9-10 Blvd.N.E.,Suite200nimmeszimmonni E . . i r = — L=204 W-9 S=1.5.� KQL. 1.3_:c E_ 2 s. \.41! • • � '� . _ . — a'° —'� ?OOQ_ _.is . _.. \ Kirkl�nd,WA 98033 i •\i :�`�� 1. :---.,.yr.,.,_.,..:71517/1 'l/ / ' — e_f ��=� �' •�,� �` Tel‘O<W7 ; ''.-....._MOO i 1 r — ,t - \--1,c `.` Tel 425)827-5874 ova I cj Fax(425)822 7216 I F — PRQPOS F 17 i *. \• - • _T — /.'/l `+' \ _ I�- . i I / -::..1 , �T 3 airy Q. \.1! 7_ re_ � 0 /SPL T7FR r ; S �.� �.�..��.�s / �. ▪ \\ / � r ' r __ .,J` ( ` Al Q 1 • —_ _ i, r PROPOSED SP/L ��`'• CO Q 100' 0 100' I / /fON77?' 0 DEV/C �: I i J I l 1-1 ' `�,� � - i _ I / / - 1 l\ ,+ \ I \\ \-- �) imilimmilm.11.11mmilmnim 11111,..‘I if SCALE: 1 = 100 PROPOSED /NFlL1RA770N•�� J J_\ `;\\,.1:5:: — - / 1 \�Ij111I ��/ �� —/ \� '� \ �� / p FA l / . _ . , �-��, , I� � 1111/i( , f � . t l _ _�li Is o MWS 353.00i//jai-\� - / I) 1r ��l�f �� I 1 s / r V J BOTTOM 349.50 /�/ . ��,: '` t �' DEVELOPED SITE AREA_ I\ \ �, 111 t\ o Q BOTTOM SURFACE AREA ��. \ I hl �`\ .IP r, ��71 f0..36 ACRES �'/ —^ r \ Ii'{-�- ———• W �j 2,000 SF �� y 1 _�_ •:. P C�J -//, / I ) I "" _ -t , _. \ 1 ) 1 / i 0 W W REQUIRED VOLUME �� - �`---I • l. -,;,:.�`` `�/ ��i irll I I/ f f �- I i !i i,I' / i IIIII 11,373 CF / ! /1 )�z / e l,, i _ CC O PROVIDED VOLUME e ��s. e, J▪ IJ..l I I I i �'' — —.� Ii I I j 1 12,033 CF �� ` /. I s- I i — s�'\ ��`�� c y I` ' f ` I. 1111• / ','� /( _ ti / i j is / Immommesimmo orook.oic...toir .'v•-•:•••..1/4,...,--.."‘_.. .:,....,..---7-11.r__1_1-1:iir------4---",;:---: „if//,,rj,/ • • I P.P?:1:651-----.NN: �/F}' OF rrENTO!) J�IV v • •.. ::::-/,--;;;;-..7,...i..___•-. • 7l fK '♦ : 11,,,....z.T7--1-i 1..: .• I• PNlUP ARNOLD PARK .-.------::::1- -� + ' —,:;37- — ji:l5 • • L L i �s*-' -"----.-'....- - e...,./ / „/ II j `• Ilteg -' �_ �--—-_._._._ gaaaaaaaaaaa I y- 'y ,' �_ II O -• CTAIANAGEPo '_\�`� r• pv` • 1 ' DESIGNED d srw . .r _ �� ! FIT \\` CADD R orew `., .•\ 1 / )& s `` -4 Q I CHECKED \ ..:-...o)'� 1 ^, wY�I ,L - DATE I/0/00 I Ck`>•,,_qj\ 74 , , (( I 1 -- l___ —____—_ r ` r. FRE NAME:DalfR2 / • 1 r • • I 1 il i_____ . . , • . •___. ... _,... ....... i II / I , \ ..._ , - _ ______ _ . .:, , ..., . . , „ ____ _ ... -, •,... _. , „ , , , . _______ _ \- .. ____ _,,,, , J , -/----__> . -\-- •_. r- ( _,,,- ......_ ., • --1 I . . . STAMP NOT U • 1 `c '\ \\` if.! \ UNLESS SIGNED AND DATED Ce ` \ /..-- JOB NUMBER w• HERM-002o Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 Runoff time series were created for only the developed site hydrology using the reduced 8-year data. The hourly.series was used to size the infiltration facility and the 15-minute series was run to size the biofiltration swale. The regional scale factor is 1.0 and the soil cover and type is • outwash grass. All pertinent calculations and printouts for the time series are included within this report. Facility Desiin The infiltration facility was sized by trial and error in accordance with the KCRTS detailed routing method. The design intent for the facility is to verify that there is not a peak outflow and the discharge volume is zero, per Section 5.4.2 of the 1998 KCSWDM. The infiltration. rate was assumed to be 15.0 in/hr based on the soil type with a factor of safety of 2, 7.5 in/hr was used for this preliminary analysis; soil testing will be completed per the 1998 KCSWDM to determine the actual rate. The following are the preliminary calculations for this facility: AREAS: Impervious Area=2.13 Acres (ROW only) DEVELOPED PEAKS: Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:dev.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - -Peaks- - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 0.516 7 2/09/01 2:00 1.01 1 100.00 0.990 0.455 8 1/05/02 16:00 0.773 2 .25.00 0.960 0.630 3 12/08/02 18:00 0.630 3 10.00 0.900 0.531 6 8/26/04 2:00 0.630 . 4 5.00 0.800 0.630 4 10/28/04 16:00 0.552 5 3.00 0.667 0.552 5 1/18/06 16:00 0.531 6 2.00 0.500 • 0.773 2 10/26/06 0:00 0.516 7 1.30 0.231 1.01 1 1/09/08 6:00 0.455 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 0.928 . 50.00 0.980 Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 16 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 KCRTS OUTPUT: Retention/Detention Facility Type of Facility: Infiltration Pond Side Slope: 3.00 H:1V Pond Bottom Length: 80.00 ft Pond Bottom Width: 25.00 ft Pond Bottom Area: 2000. sq. ft Top Area at 1 ft. FB: 5564. sq. ft 0.128 acres Effective Storage Depth: 3.50 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 100.00 ft Storage Volume: 11373. cu. ft 0.261 ac-ft Vertical Permeability: 8.00 min/in Permeable Surfaces: Bottom Riser Head: 3.50 ft Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches Top Notch Weir:None Outflow Rating Curve:None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation Surf Area (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac-ft) (cfs) (cfs) (sq. ft) 0.00 100.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 2000. 0.10 100.10 203. 0.005 0.000 0.35 2063. 0.20 100.20 413. 0.009 0.000 0.35 2127. 0.30 100.30 629. 0.014 0.000 0.35 2192. 0.40 100.40 851. 0.020 0.000 0.35 2258. 0.50 100.50 1080. 0.025 0.000 0.35 2324. 0.60 100.60 1316. 0.030 0.000 0.35 2391. 0.70 100.70 1559. 0.036 0.000, 0.35 2459. 0.80 100.80 1808. 0.041 0.000 0.35 2527. 0.90 100.90 2064. 0.047 0.000 0.35 2596. 1.00 101.00 2327. 0.053 0.000 0.35 2666. 1.10 101.10 2597. 0.060 0.000 .0.35 2737. 1.20 101.20 2874. 0.066 0.000 . 0.35 . 2808. 1.30 101.30 3159. 0.073 0.000 0.35 2880. 1.40 101.40 3450. 0.079 0.000 0.35 2953. 1.50 101.50 3749. 0.086 0.000 0.35 3026. 1.60 101.60 4056. 0.093 0.000 0.35 3100. 1.70 101.70 4369. 0.100 0.000 0.35 3175. 1.80 101.80 4691. 0.108 0.000 0.35 3251. 1.90 101.90 5020. 0.115 0.000 0.35 3327. 2.00 102.00 5356. 0.123 0.000 0.35 3404. 2.10 .102.10 5700. 0.131 0.000 0.35 3482. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 17 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 2.20 -102.20 6052. 0.139 0.000 0.35 3560. 2.30 102.30 6412. 0.147 0.000 0.35 3639. 2.40 102.40 6780. 0.156 0.000 0.35 3719. 2.50 102.50 7156. 0.164 0.000 0.35 3800. 2.60 102.60 7540. 0.173 0.000 0.35 3881. 2.7.0 102.70 7933. 0.182 0.000 0.35 3963. 2.80 102.80 8333. 0.191 0.000 0.35 4046. 2.90 102.90 8742. 0.201 0.000 0.35 4130. 3.00 103.00 9159. 0.210 0.000 0.35 4214. 3.10 103.10 9585. 0.220 0.000 0.35 4299. 3.20 103.20 10019. 0.230 0.000. 0.35 4385. 3.30 103.30 10462. 0.240 0.000 0.35 4471. • 3.40 103.40 10913. 0.251 0.000 0.35 4558. 3.50 103.50 11373. 0.261 0.000 0.35 4646. 3.60 103.60 11842. 0.272 0.308 0.35 4735. 3.70 103.70 12320. 0.283 0.871 0.35 4824. 3.80 103.80 12807. 0.294 1.600 0.35 4914. 3.90 103.90 13303. 0.305 2.390 0.35 5005. 4.00 104.00 13808. 0.317 2.670 .0.35 5096. 4.10 104.10 14322. 0.329 2.930 0.35 5188. 4.20 104.20 14846. 0.341 3.160 0.35 5281. 4.30 104.30 15378. 0.353 3.380 0.35 5375. 4.40 104.40 15921. 0.365 3.590 0.35 5469. 4.50 104.50 16472. 0.378 3.780 0.35 5564. 4.60 104.60 . 17033. 0.391 3.970. 0.35 .5660. 4.70 104.70 17604. 0.404 4.140 0.35 5756. 4.80 104.80 18185. 0.417 4.310 0.35 5853. 4.90 104.90 18775. 0.431 4.470 0.35 5951. 5.00 105.00 19375. 0.445 4.630 0.35 6050. 5.10 105.10 19985. 0.459 4.780 0.35 6149. 5.20 105.20 20605. 0.473 4.930 0.35 6249. 5.30 105.30 21235. 0.487 5.070 .0.35 6350. 5.40 105.40 21875. 0.502 5.210 0.35 6452. 5.50 105.50 22525. 0.517 5.350 0.35 6554. Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Storage Target Cale Stage Elev (Cu-Ft) (Ac-Ft) 1 1.01 ******* 0.00 3.29 103.29 10398. 0.239 2 0.77 ******* 0.00 1.23 101.23 2965. 0.068 3 0.63 ******* 0.00 0.83 100.83 1877. 0.043 4 0.63 ******* 0.00 0.98 100.98 2266. 0.052 5 0.55 ******* 0.00 1.35 101.35 3291. 0.076 6 0.53 ******* 0.00 0.37 100.37 786. 0.018 • 7 0.52 ******* 0.00 0.73 100.73 1644. 0.038 8 0.45 ******* 0.00 0.24 100.24 496. 0.011 Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 18 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:dev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:rdout Inflow/Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: 1.01 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Outflow Discharge: 0.000 CFS at 11:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 Peak Reservoir Stage: 3.29 Ft Peak Reservoir Elev: 103.29 Ft Peak Reservoir Storage: 10398. Cu-Ft 0.239 Ac-Ft Discharge Volume Discharge Volume from Time Series rdout.tsf between 10/01/00 00:00 and 09/30/08 23:59 0. Cu-Ft or 0.000 Ac-Ft in 2920.0 days Biofiltration Swale Sizing: A bio-filtration swale was sized per Section 6.3.1 of the 1998 KCSWDM to treat stormwater generated on site. The water quality design flow is 60% of the developed two-year peak flow rate, as determined using the KCRTS flow with a 15-minute time step: Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:her25bio.tsf Project Location:Sea-Tac ---Annual Peak Flow Rates--- Flow Frequency Analysis Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (CFS) Period 1.01 6 8/27/01 18:00 2.51 1 100.00 0.990 0.708 8 9/17/02 17:45 . 1.92 2 25.00 0.960 1.92 2 . 12/08/02 17:15 1.37 3 10.00 0.900 0.817 7 8/23/04 14:30 1.13 4 5.00• 0.800 1.07 5 10/28/04 16:00 1.07 5 3.00 0.667 1.13 4 10/27/05 10:45 1.01 6 2.00 0.500 1.37 3 10/25/06 22:45 0.817 1 7 1.30 0.231 2.51 1 1/09/08 6:30 0.708 8 1.10 0.091 Computed Peaks 2.31 50.00 0.980 Step 1: Calculate design flows 2-Year peak flow rate: 1.01 60%: 0.61 CFS Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 19 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 Step 2: Calculate swale bottom width b=(Qwn x n q)/ 1.49y1.67 x sos Q„,q=flow rate=0.61 CFS n,q =Manning's roughness coefficient=0.20 y=design flow depth=0.17feet s=longitudinal slope= 1.5% b=(0.61 x 0.20)/ 1.49 x(0.17)1.67 x(0.015)o.5 b= 12.9feet Step 3: Determine design flow velocity V„q=Q„q/A„q . Q„q=0.61CFS A„q=by+Zy2 ;b=12.9 feet, y=0.17 feet, Z=3 A, =(12.9 x 0.17)+(3 x(0.17)2)=2.28 SF V„q=0.61 /2.28 V„q=0.27 fps Step 4: Calculate swale length L=540V„q V„q=0.27 fps ' L=540 (0.27)= 146 feet Step 5: Adjust swale layout to fit on site The length of the swale can be adjusted based on the treatment top area based on the swale length calculated in Step 4. Atop (bi+hive)Li bi=bottom width calculated in Step 2= 12.9 feet bsi=the additional top width above the side slope for the design water depth =2 x(3 x 0.17)= 1.02 feet Li= 146 feet Atop=(12.9+1.02) 146=2,032 sf Then usingthe swale toparea and an increased swale length of 204 feet, the new width of the bio-swale can be,computed using the following equation: ' Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 20 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 I-f=Atop/(bf+bb ) Lf=204 feet Atop=2,032 sf bdope= 1.02 feet 204=2,032/(bf+ 1.02) bf= 8.94 feet, use 9 feet The proposed biofiltration swale is 204 feet long, 9 feet wide, with 3:1 side slopes. The • swale has been designed to convey the water quality design peak flow. The Biofiltration Swale Worksheet was utilized to calculate the required dimensions of the swale and is included in the Appendix for reference. V. CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND DESIGN This section of the report is not applicable at this time. VI. SPECIAL REPORTS AND STUDIES o Geotechnical Engineering Study by Geotech Consultants,Inc. dated September 14, 1999 VII. OTHER PERMITS . • This section of the report is not applicable at this time. VIII. ESC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN At the preliminary stage this section is not applicable. Erosion control analysis, design and procedures will be provided at the time of preparation of the Construction Documents. Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 21 Preliminary Technical Information Report for Heritage Philip Arnold April 10, 2000 IX. BOND QUANTITIES, FACILITY SUMMARIES AND DECLARATION OF COVENANT This section of the report is not applicable at this time. XI. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL This section of the report is not applicable at this time. • • Peterson Consulting Engineers Page 22 APPENDIX • •• 1 • • LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN _.::- 1 ,.. Basin Boundary .1•:,ImLI - -- u catchment Boundary 4 r. — -i •__;i ..—� -r / . Collection Point ,� \ ..€ . ' \ . I ' ' , I _.'-- Stream • j :. �.'. (: __i J.' '_ ._ ",�-' .. �- ozss Tributary Number ` I '.., � ao :.a, • ®3115 Proposed Project 1 t�., , `i �`l_/� �c� :` Y :+;» Icy Sty 2 Miles - g� 1, • fig ;. 'oI 4._ �__ '� .. : 1 �ji'�1t0�.:i �" 'ya .y`a - .. I i, \ gg p3 e} July,1987 ram--. . _ p �'[ - : Vo ,A. i�•) . I;9 '.,;. o '--i 7 R `.�'O• Q ,"�`\`\.� (: - l.`u Grnvc ( r 99• , ,s 45, ram. "- y-.. I3r r�`Z - - 1 W a, \` ,.. wp o • • 3117 .•N. 1 9 . . _ 3121 o si p32 bK ` ° 7 i3122 � "' Q+ ` . , b �� ' -. .� \t • r°)\-,. A.: k - - ---_— , �If -''+_� • ,x. • .,,,,,....„.\ • i - .,i. r �.a1:2 G' • M '�I t yY sc.p N .o3115 • 7. ��. • 3 1 a ._ 0 3'� o a. . / CI'•.OFSEATTLE�VIATERSH:• \ P' p =J; ,^� ; oog9c.. `° 3112 311' • • S"" i9 .� .... ,, 4.'ro \ Maple Valley • • ----- _ ,jam _-_'41 '- • 1 j: � si a • RECONNAISSANCE REPORT NO. 13 LOWER CEDAR CREEK BASIN • JUNE 1987 Natural Resources and Parks Division and Surface Water Management Division King County, Washington King County Executive Tim Hill King County Council Audrey Gruger, District 1 Cynthia Sullivan, District 2 Bill Reams, District 3 Lois North, District 4 Ron Sims, District 5 Brace I_aing District •t Paul Barden, District 7 Bob Grieve, District 8 Gary Grant, District 9 Department of Public Works Parks, Planning and Resources Don LaBelle, Director Joe Nagel, Director Surface Water Management Division Natural Resources and Parks Division Joseph J. Simmler, Division Manager Russ Cahill, Division Manager Jim Kramer, Assistant Division Manager Bill Jolly, Acting Division Manager Dave Clark, Manager, River & Water Derek Poon; Chief, Resources Planning Section Resource Section Bill Eckel, Manager, Basin Planning Program Larry Gibbons, Manager, Project Management and Design Section Contributing Staff Contributing Staff Doug Chin, Sr. Engineer Ray Heller, Project Manager & Team Leader Randall Parsons, Sr. Engineer Matthew Clark, Project Manager Andy Levesque, Sr. Engineer Robert,R. Fuerstenberg, Biologist & Team Leader Bruce Barker, Engineer Matthew J. Bruengo, Geologist Amy Stonkus, Engineer Lee Benda, Geologist Ray Steiger, Engineer Derek Booth, Geologist Pete Ringen, Engineer Dyanne Sheldon, Wetlands Biologist Cindy Baker, Earth Scientist Di Johnson, Planning Support Technician Robert:Radek, Planning Support Technician Randal Bays, Planning Support Technician Fred Bentler, Planning Support Technician Consulting Staff Mark Hudson, Planning Support Technician Sharon Clausen, Planning Support Technician Don Spencer, Associate Geologist, Earth David Truax, Planning Support Technician Consultants, Inc. Brian Vanderburg, Planning Support Technician John Bethel, Soil Scientist, Earth Carolyn M. Byerly, Technical Writer Consultants, Inc. Susanna Hornig, Technical Writer Virginia Newman, Graphic Artist Marcia McNulty, Typesetter Mildred Miller, Typesetter Jaki Reed, Typesetter Lela Lira, Office Technician Marty Cox, Office Technician - ( - ti< P:CR TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. FINDINGS IN LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN 2 A. Overview of Basin 2 B. Effects of Urbanization 4 C. Specific Problems 5 1. Drainage and flooding problems 5 2. Damage to property 6 3. Destruction of habitat 6 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION 7 A. Reduce landslide hazards 7 B. Reduce erosion and flooding 7 C. Prevent future erosion and flooding with appropriate analysis, 3 planning, and policy development D. Stop present (and prevent future) damage to habitat 8 by addressing specific problems in stream systems V. MAP 11 APPENDICES: APPENDIX A: Estimated Costs A-1 APPENDIX B: Capital Improvement Project Ranking B-1 APPEDDIX C: Detailed Findings and Recommendations C-1 I. SUMMARY • The Lower Cedar River Basin, in southwest King County, is unique in its development pat- terns and the associated environmental problems that appear throughout the basin. Except for the city of Renton and areas on the Cedar River Valley floor, most of the development in the basin has occurred on the upland plateaus. Most of this development is recent and primarily residential. In addition, the plateau is the site of numerous sand and gravel mining operations and, in the southern uplands, an abandoned coal mine. Peat is also being mined north of Otter Lake. In some areas livestock are being raised on small farms; there are no major crop-related agricultural activities in the basin. The effects of development are most apparent where storm drainage is routed over the valley walls. Impervious surfaces on the plateau have increased the rate and volume of storm runoff, resulting in substantial erosion, siltation, and flooding below. In addi- tion, erosion and siltation.have damaged or destroyed habitat in many tributaries, threatening the survival of fish. Habitat and water quality throughout the basin are also threatened by the filling of wetlands and the presence of large amounts of domestic trash in some streams. The reconnaissance team noted that the Peterson Creek system has so far remained in its natural, nearly pristine condition. Maintaining this quality should be a high priority in future basin planning capital project programs. Recommendations in the Lower Cedar River Basin include 1) designing and constructing appropriately sized R/D and other drainage facilities; 2) establishing stricter land use policies regarding floodplains, wetlands, and gravel mining; 3) conducting more detailed and comprehensive hydraulic/hydrologic analyses of proposed developments; and 4) preventing damage to the natural drainage system. The field team also recommends 5) restoring the habitat of several tributaries (e.g., cleaning gravels, revegetating stream banks, and diversifying streambeds for spawning and rearing) as well as 6) protecting the nearly pristine quality of Peterson Creek. H. INTRODUCTION: History and Goals of the Program In 1985 the King County Council approved funding for the'Planning Division (now called the Natural Resources and Parks Division), in coordination with the Surface Water Management Division, to conduct a reconnaissance of 29 major drainage basins located in King County. The effort began with an initial investigation of three basins -- Evans, Soos, and Hylebos Creeks -- in order to determine existing and potential surface water problems and to recommend action to mitigate and prevent these problems. These initial investiga- tions used available data and new field observations to examine geology, hydrology, and habitat conditions in each basin. Findings from these three basins led the King County Council to adopt Resolution 6018 in April 1986, calling for reconnaissance to be completed on the remaining 26 basins. The Basin Reconnaissance Program, which was subsequently established, is now an important ele- ment of surface water management. The goals,of the program are to provide useful data with regard to 1) critical problems needing immediate solutions, 2) basin characteristics for use in the preparation of detailed basin management plans, and 3) capital costs associated with the early resolution of drainage and problems. The reconnaissance reports are intended to provide an evaluation of present drainage con- ditions in the County in order to transmit information to policymakers to aid them in developing more detailed regulatory measures and specific capital improvement plans. They are not intended to ascribe in any conclusive manner the causes of drainage or erosion P:LC 1 • Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) • problems; instead, they are to be used as initial surveys from which choices for subsequent detailed engineering and other professional environmental analyses may be made. Due to • the limited amount of time available for the field work in each basin, the reports must be viewed as descriptive environmental narratives rather than as final engineering conclusions. • Recommendations contained in each report provide a description of potential mitigative measures for each particular basin; these measures might provide maximum environmental protection through capital project construction or development approval conditions. The appropriate extent of such measures will be decided on a case-by-case basis by County offi- cials responsible for reviewing applications for permit approvals and for choosing among competing projects for public construction. Nothing in the reports is intended to substitute for a more thorough environmental and engineering analysis possible on a site-specific basis • for any proposal. • III. FINDINGS IN LOWER CEDAR RIVER BASIN The field reconnaissance of Lower Cedar River Basin was conducted in January 1987 by • Robert R. Fuerstenberg, biologist; Bruce L.. Barker, engineer; and Lee Benda, geologist. Their findings and recommendations are presented here. • A. • Overview of Lower Cedar River Basin The lower Cedar River Basin is located in southwest King County and is 27 square • miles in area. It extends southeast from the mouth of the Cedar River on Lake Washington to approximately river 'mile 14.0. The boundary to the northeast is marked by a ridgetop connecting the city of Renton to Webster and Franklin Lakes; the boundary to the southwest runs along Petrovitsky Road to Lake Youngs. • • Renton is the only incorporated area in the basin. Other population centers include Fairwood, Maplewood Heights, and Maple Valley. Except for the city of Renton, most of the residential concentrations are located on the upland plateaus overlooking the Cedar River Valley. These upland developments are recent compared to the smaller established communities on the valley floor. The basin lies within portions of three King County planning areas: Newcastle in the northeast (which includes Renton), Tahoma-Raven Heights in the east, and Soos Creek (the largest of the three) in the west. Rural areas exist on the valley floor on both sides of the Lower Cedar River, from approximately river mile 5.50 to 13.00. These are limited to pastureland for horses, • cows, and some sheep and several small "u-pick" fruit and vegetable farms. Similar areas are located on the southern uplands above the reach from river mile 5.50 to 7.00 and in the Lake Desire-Otter Lake area. The plateau is also the site of sand and • gravel mining operations and, in the southern uplands, of the abandoned Fire King Coal Mine. Peat deposits exist west of Lake Desire and north and south of Otter Lake, and peat mining is being carried 'out north of Otter Lake. Present zoning allows for urban and suburban densities throughout much of the basin, particularly on the upland plateaus and in the Cedar River Valley from its mouth to• appoximately river mile 6.50. Population projections for the year 2000 in the three plannign areas containing the Lower Cedar Basin are over 311,000; an increase of 47 P:LC 2 • Lower Cedar River Basin • (continued) • percent from the present. Most of this growth will occur in the Soos Creek Planning Area. Dominant geological and geomorphic features. The geology of the Lower Cedar River Basin is diverse. Geological formations exposed along the valley include sedimentary rocks, undifferentiated older glacial drift, extensive ground moraine deposits, recent alluvium along the Cedar River, and landslide deposits along the river and its tribu- taries. The sedimentary rocks, composed of moderately dipping sandstones, con • - glomerates, mudstones, and shales, are exposed locally along the cliffs of the Cedar • . River Valley near the mouth of the Cedar River. In addition, the Renton formation, composed of sandstones, mudstones, and shales with periodic deposits of coal, is also exposed along the lower portion of the Lower"Cedar River Valley. • Undifferentiated glacial deposits found here are composed of three or more till sheets, glacio-fluvial sand and gravel, glacio-lacustrine clay, and sand, and non-glacial sand, clay and thin peat. These lie over the sedimentary rock formations and are best exposed • • in cross-section along the cliffs of the main valley and major tributaries. The morphology of the Lower Cedar River Basin is dominated by the valley formed • by the Cedar River. Valley walls are steep cliffs formed by landslides in glacial sedi-. meats. A once extensive and meandering River, which created a wide valley floor as it cut its way westward, the Cedar today is diked for most of its length through the lower valley. A narrow but extensive band of landslide deposits exists along the steep cliffs of the main river and its major tributaries. The landslide deposits consist of deformed blocks of glacial sediments and colluvium derived from slides or mass flowage, such as landslides and debris flows. Recent alluvial deposits fill the valley and major tributaries. Small, composite, alluvial debris fans exist at the mouths of the largest tributaries. Closed depressions, principally in the uplands, have lacustrine and peat deposits. The Lower Cedar River Valley has a high potential for erosion due to steep slopes and the existence of a clay layer that promotes soil failures. In addition, the confined nature of tributary channels between steep hillslopes promotes bank erosion during high flows. Numerous recent landslides are evident along cliffs of many of the steep tributaries and along the main stem of the Cedar River. These have been accelerated by the removal of vegetation and the routing of concentrated storm flows over steep slopes in areas where development has occurred. __, Hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics. The Cedar River Basin is composed of a complex drainage network consisting of the Cedar River and 17 tributaries. The larger • tributaries begin in lakes or wetlands on,the bluffs and flow through relatively flat, stable channels to the edge of the Cedar River Valley, then plunge down to the valley floor through steep, erodible ravines.. Tributaries of this type such as Tributary 0304 (with headwaters at Wetland.3111) and Tributary 0328 (which begins at Lake Desire), are found on the south side of the Cedar River. Another type of tributary collects surface runoff from urbanized areas, pastureland, and wooded areas. Tributaries 0302, 0307, and 0312 are examples of this type of tributary. They are intermittent (depending on rainfall), shorter in length, flow through shallower channels that are steeper at the bluffs and transport more material during times of • P:LC 3 Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) high flows. Some of the worst problems located during field investigation (see Appendix C for a full listing) occur on this type of tributary. Catchments 5, 6, and 12 have very infiltrative soils. Urban developments hvae utilized R/D poinds to effectively infiltrate all urban runoff before it reaches the valley hillslopes. The infiltrated runoff then reappears as springs. Two large lakes (Desire and Otter), together with four smaller ones (Shady, Peterson, Webster, and Francis) lie in the southeast third of the basin. Numerous large wetland areas exist in this section as well. The field team identified 10 potential wetland sites that had not been previously identified in the Sensitive Areas Map Folio (SAMF). The system of lakes and wetlands in this area effectively buffers the high flows draining to these tributaries. Habitat characteristics.. With few exceptions, usable fish habitat exists only in peren- nial streams (i.e., Trib. 0302, 0304, 0305, 0328, and possibly 0308). In other streams (e.g., Trib. 0303 and 0310), steep gradients preclude fish use. Steep gradients also reduce fish use in the perennial systems (except for Trib. 0328). Habitat is in various stages of degradation in these systems; pools are being filled and gravels and debris shift regularly. In Tributary 0328 (Peterson Creek),, however; habitat diversity is extensive, and the channel is not seriously degraded. At this location the field team observed at least three species of salmonoids. In general, the most diverse and least disturbed habitat in a tributary system occurs in the large wetland areas in the southeast third of the basin. Usable habitat. for anadromous fish is found in the low-gradient portions of streams where channels cross the Cedar River Valley floor. In these reaches, however, only spawning habitat is likely to he available, as the pools and woody debris necessary for successful rearing either do not exist or are quite limited. Excellent spawning and rearing areas exist where pools and riffles are extensive, instream cover and bank vegetation are intact, and diversity of habitat types is abundant. B. Effects of Urbanization in the Basin Flooding, erosion, and the degradation of habitat associated with development in the Lower Cedar River Basin are most apparent where development has eliminated vege- tation along the edges of the valley and where stormwater has been routed down channels and swales. The removal of vegetation, such as trees, above and below the edges of valley walls, as well as,the discharging of stormwater over the valley wall, has resulted in tension cracks and landslides that are endangering some houses. The sedi- ments from these failures are depositing in streams and on valley floors and damaging fish habitat and private property. Discharging stormwater from increased impervious areas into steep tributary channels and swales is seriously destabilizing channels and valley walls; this in turn results in channel downcutting, bank erosion, and landslides. The sediments from these problems often degrade fish habitat and settle out on pri- vate property along the vaiiey floor. ' Two serious instances of development-related erosion occurred during the November 1986 storm: 1) culverts rerouting the stream were plugged, causing the formation of a � new channel that destroyed portions of roads on Tributary 0314; and 2) new, uncom- P:LC 4 • • Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) pacted fill adjacent to new residences near collection point 5 was washed partly away during the storm, causing landsliding and gullying. • Future problems will be similar to these, as commercial and residential developments increase flow rates and volumes by decreasing natural storage and infiltration. This is • expected to occur if wetlands on the upper plateau are encroached upon or lost (e.g., on Trib. 0 304 at RM 2.30 and on Trib. 0304A at Rm 1.60). The-preservation of wetlands and streambank vegetation and the attenuation of storm flows are essential in this basin. C. Specific Problems Identified The steep valley sideslopes through which streams pass and the often dense upland development result in a number of similar problems that repeat themselves throughout the Lower Cedar River Basin. The most significant of these are outlined and discussed below. 1. Drainage and flooding problems are often the result of several conditions: • a. Undersized culverts and inadequate entrance structures. The most notable area is on Tributary 0306 at river mile .30, where a culvert here was blocked by debris carried downstream by the stream and caused erosion and flooding of Fanwood Golf Course. The blockage was compounded by the fact that the culvert was undersized; the problem will worsen as flows increase from upstream development. b. Serious instream erosion and subsequent downstream sedimentation. These have been caused by three main factors: 1) runoff from residential developments on the bluffs above the valley, 2) compacted pastureland due to livestock, and 3) runoff from impervious areas originating at gravel pits. These problems will continue and worsen until mitigative measures are • taken. (See Appendix C for specific examples.). c. Undersized rechannclized streams. Tributaries on the valley floor are too • • small to carry the increased flows originating in developed residential areas • along the top of the bluffs. For example, Tributary 0302 at river mile .25, the channel along Maplewood Golf Course, overtops and floods during storms. d. Construction in wetland and floodplain areas, Many of the wetlands on the . • south side of the Cedar River are peat bogs, and roads built through them continue to settle each year, increasing the amount of flooding on the road. • For example, the road crossing with Tributary•0328B north of Lake Desire will experience more severe flooding as the road settles. • • e. Discharging of stormwater at the top of steep banks. At river mile 2.20 on the Cedar River, a trailer park (constructed on the edge of the cliff) discharges its drainage down the valley wall. Increased flows erode the steep valley, depositing sediments on the valley floor, blocking channels and causing flooding. These problems will eventually stabilize, but only after a • large quantity of soil has been eroded. P:LC 5 • Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) , 2. Damage to property is being caused by three factors: a. Landslides and potential landslides. Landslides are accelerated by the removal of vegetation on steep slopes in preparation for residential construction and/or by the routing of storm flows over hillslopes. For example, a large landslide has already occurred in the front yard of a resi- dence on the Cedar River at. river mile 7.80. b. Sedimentation (from landslides). Sedimentation and channel •and bank ero- sion are damaging private property along the valley floor (Trib. 0299 and • 0310). • c. Flooding during storms. Flooding has been brought on by the effects of development and associated changes to the natural drainage systems in the • basin. (See "B" above.) • • 3. Destruction of habitat is being cauked, by four conditions: a. Sedimentation of pools and riffles and cementing of gravels. These • problems, the result of severe erosion and the transport of bedload material, have been caused by upland developments in the basin and the presence of associated impervious surfaces, which increase the rate and • quantity of surface runoff. Sedimentation and cementing of gravels in streambeds destroy natural spawning and rearing habitat. On Tributary • 0307 at river mile .40 and Tributary 0305 at river miles .95, 1.20, and 1.70, recent high flows have eroded the streambed at least one foot, contributing to a serious siltation problem downstream. Heavy bedload transport is evi- dent in all systems of the basin except Tributary 0328. In Tributary 0303 at river mile .25, fine sediments are accumulating in gravels that may be used by resident fish In Tributary 0304 between river miles .95 and 1.20, pools are being filled by sands and gravels and rearing habitat is being rapidly lost. b. Cbannelization of stream beds. Loss of habitat through channelization has occurred in all the major streams of the basin, but most noticeably in those reaches that cross the valley floor. These reaches lack habitat diversity, • reducing fish use for spawning and rearing. Channelization has damaged or destroyed, habitat in several reaches that were once heavily used by fish; these include Tributary 0302 between river mile .30 and 40, Tributary 0304 between river miles .05 and .18, Tributary 0305 between river mile .20 and .75, and Tributary 0328 from river mile 1.10 to 1.40. These systems cannot afford a further reduction of habitat and still remain viable fishery resour- ces. • c. The accumulation of trash in stream beds. This problem occurs in close proximity to residential areas. Trash degrades water quality and is visually unpleasant. Tires, appliances, furniture, and other trash have been thrown into Tributary 0302 at river miles 1.00 and 1.10 and in Tributary 0303 at river mile .35. • • P:LC 6 Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) • d. Wetland encroachment. Encroachment destroys habitat and eliminates natural water filtration and storage for surface runoff. Examples of this problem were observed on Tributary 0304 at river mile 2.30, Tributary 0308 at .80, and Tributary 0304A at river mile 1.80. Many wetlands have already been completely lost through filling, for example on Tributary 0306A at river mile .55. Suspected violations were forwarded to Building and Land Development for enforcement. IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION The primary recommendations for action in the Lower Cedar River Basin addresses current severe problems related to erosion, habitat destruction, and flooding. • Prevention of these problems will be accomplished by controlling locations and densities of new development and providing adequate R/D facilities for stormwater. A. Reduce landslide hazards by: 1- Including sensitive areas not previously mapped on the Sensitive Areas Map Folio (SAMF). See Appendix C for a full listing of sensitive areas. 2. Establishing building setbacks along cliffs, and native growth protection easements along steep ravines. 3. Discouraging or eliminating the routing of stormwater over cliffs, unless adequate tightline systems can be constructed to convey flows in a safe, nonerosive manner to the bottom of cliffs. 4_ Decreasing peak flows by constructing larger R/D facilities to lessen the landslide and erosion occurrence along tributary slopes. B. Reduce erosion and flooding in the basin by improving surface water management: 1. Direct the Facilities Management Section of the Surface Water Management Division to evaluate existing storm-detention and conveyance facilities to deter- mine whether they are properly sized to meet current standards. Evaluation should begin with all single-orifice R/D facilities. B. Consider areas other than wetlands as regional storm-detention facilities. Tributary 0300 at river mile .42 is the site for a'proposed•dam, for example. 3. Utilize existing lower quality. wetlands (those rated other than #1) as regional storm-detention facilities. Wetlands 3102 and 3142 could provide more live storage, for example. 4. Review channel and culvert capacity for conveying existing and future runoff, and establish floodplain areas in regions of slight gradient for existing and future runoff conditions. 5. Promote the infiltration of surface water through the use of retention facilities and open channels instead of pipes where the soil and slope conditions permit. Collection points 5, 6, and 12 on plateaus have such soil conditions. P:LC 7 • • • Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) • C. Prevent future problems of erosion and flooding with appropriate analysis, planning, and policy development related to surface water management: 1. Conduct a detailed, comprehensive hydraulic/hydrologic analysis of any proposed developments to determine impacts'on the drainage courses downstream. This is especially critical for areas on the upper bluffs and 'plateau, which drain over• steep, sensitive banks above the Cedar River. • •2 Conduct a study of the impact of locating infiltration ponds utilized near the edge of the bluffs to determine their effect on seepage faces on the lower face of the bluffs. This might be accomplished with a computer-based numerical model of the groundwater flow. 3. ' Require the tightlining of storm drainage down steep or sensitive slopes when they cannot be directed away from the slopes. This is done by piping the flow down the slope and discharging it at the bottom with adequate energy dissipation. Many of the intermittent tributaries flowing down the banks should be tightlined • as urban development- increases flow to them. 4. Construct new R/D ponds with filter,berms to improve water quality and reduce fine sediment loads. New R/D.ponds should have two cells with gravel-berm filters and vegetated swales at the -inlet and outlet. Consider Tributaries 0304, 0304A, 0302, and 0303 as sites for this type of facility in order enhance water quality. • 5. Maintain natural vegetation on streambanks and floodplains. This is especially important for relatively flat channels flowing on the plateau before they reach the steep bluffs because these channels and their floodplains will attenuate flows during times of heavy runoff. • 6. Maintain buffer areas. around wetlands. Many of the tributaries on •the south side of the Cedar River'headwater at wetlands. These wetlands act as natural storage • areas during storms. • ' • • • 7. .Reevaluate King County policy regarding permitting for gravel mining on steep, sensitive slopes. • • 8. Include the city of Rention in future interlocal agreements for planning and capi- • tal improvement projects where city and county interests overlap. D. Eliminate present damage to habitat and prevent future damage by addressing specific problems in the stream systems. The following activities should be coordinated among • King County, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and State Departments of Fisheries and. Game: 1. Reduce damaging storm flows with greater detention volume and lower release • • rates at upstream developments. • 2. Implement restoration projects on Tributaries 0304 (river mile .00-.20), Tributary • 0305 (river mile .20-.80), Tributary 0303 (river mile .25-.35), and Tributary 0328 (river mile 1.10 -1.40): P:LC 8 • Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) a. On Tributary 0304: Clean streambed gravels, add habitat and bed-control weirs, and plant bank vegetation for shade. b. On Tributary 0305: Construct a new channel and move stream from road- side channel to. its new location on adjacent lands. Implement a full restoration project to provide channel meanders, habitat structures, pool/riffle enhancement, streambed gravel replacement, and revegetation. c. On Tributary 0303: Move stream from present channel to a location further north, away from the roadside. If relocation is not possible, these minimum steps should 'be taken: Add habitat structure to existing channel with root masses, deflectors, boulder clusters, and other features; revegetate channel banks with shrubs and small trees; enhance stream crossings with bottomless pipe arches. d. On Tributary 0328 (Peterson Creek): Add habitat structure by replacing the straight, shortened channel with a more.natural, meandering one; place habitat structures (such as,root masses, deflectors, cover logs, and boulder clusters) throughout the channel; and revegetate banks with shrubs common to adjacent riparian zones (salmonberry, ninebark, or dogwood, for example). 3. Protect the Peterson Creek system (Trib. 0328) in its present, near-pristine state. This will include not only the restoration outlined in section A above, but also the adoption of land use management regulations to prevent future habitat ) . destruction: a. Protect all existing wetlands within the subcatchments of Peterson Creek. Employ wetland buffers at least 100 feet wide without exception. b. Restrict development in the critical headwater area (drainage, habitat, water quality) bounded by Lake Desire, Otter Lake, and Peterson Lake to rural densities. c. Designate and protect streamside management zones of at least 100 feet from the ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) along the main stem of the creek. Use 25 feet from the OHWM on tributaries. d. Preserve floodplains and their forests for dynamic retention of sediments and water. e. Restrict vegetation removal in streamside/wetland management zones. f. Size R/D facilities to'store the 100-year storm at a two-to-five-year release rate. Use the two-cell type of pond with a forebay, a gravel filter, and a vegetated swale outflow where feasible. • g. Regulate more closely all septic tank and drain-field installations, as well as maintenance schedules, particularly in the Lake Desire, Otter Lake, and Peterson Lake drainage areas. P:LC 9 Lower Cedar River Basin (continued) h. Work with the State Department of Ecology to, establish minimum stream- flow requirements for Peterson Creek.and Lake Desire tributary. 4. Develop and promote public education and involvement programs for basin awareness. Work with schools, environmental groups, and the civic and business communities to conduct educational. and restoration programs. • • • P:LC 10 - Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 5 0299 18 Geology Horse farm in uplands has Continued high erosion and Develop R/D at horse farm RM 12.1 'created extensive imper- sedimentation. to attenuate peak flows. vious surfaces, resulting See Project 3115. in channel scour, bank erosion, 'landslides, and sedimentation at mouth of basin. Residence overcome with sediment. 6 -- 13 Geology Landslide terrain for sale Site of future mass erosion. Prohibit development here. by realtors. High risk for Notify Building and Land landslides, flooding (from Development. Add area to springs). SAMF. 7 -- 7 Geology Large-scale landsides Natural process. None. adjacent to Cedar River due to springs and cutting of toeslopes by streams. Appears to be natural. . 8 -- � Geology • Gullying in valley wall, Unknown. None. possibly from natural springs. 9 -- 14 Geology Landslide debris flow from Existing tension cracks Revegetate hillslope with • residence on SE 147th P1., indicate future instability. trees and shrubs. Renton. • P: LC.APC. C-2 • . . ..... . .. • • „..-Ity - ,-‘. ,17'.'.'.i;,,cridy it,.t; 181,7),41.\- ,j - :,;.: '...( -.R71(,...rSI,•••*.111%com .. '/• ) i 4., ...11 \P„,-;.. '•:i• .., \1••••A.):-,40,4e; l'.. '•'-'117 -1'; ,... -h!' - •••0•:. --N.,..•sw ';, • 4r7fi 4,44 • •,,,..:Aks,) ,! •..,i,•,,;iii ..t.:, ,::•::::•,- -'cc- .. .: • i.'i .4.,::117H,-/,'-D''.775.4 c.'tz-:‘, -.--';,; 1._ ;-,z4E:i.,...4.li. • t. !....,. . -v1.5.-1,..-; '.:4.•,.:4-BLE - 71.:}4:1 . 1%--!.A Pliii; .is.X,11 ).kr,., ,I... . ,' i: -> ?a:-.• ti 7... :4,-1: ..:. •- -- 4.1 ••....,L .---.., .... . •. ...Oil .10 :3'r••4r ' ...1, '••* ---1—,, .I/‘ • .'.: ')/47.enn'4.,.7. '-,. 1c • • ):: , • .V 1 1.6' :!,,t '•. .1",. IP.;!1..';‘• ' '(i... .4A;•1 . .r. 44,,,r,,,:,.. ••,.4.3,1 im,40.1,..L0r.. ,:4 .7 r11 Vi•:, • . '-:.•:•.•:-.),.:li,,.11 J ,,,,.„ :). .- , :.. :. .• .i.f.?..... .:ii." T.,',,.•-•" ,...:710(,.Re:: .. ..,,t _ -i wb.....;.!,,,'..t..4' ' • ,-• -• ..., ..,k_.•Ti-...•,• ,,,,,.•, - .,,..' • 1..... - , . .--:••.•A; •,';, '' • 1.•iv,, 43-.,,,-,,,),`, ..,,•-•,-,.. -•,,,•1.•-t,• (--z-;), . 7.':...... . ).P.:,.'.; .{(,:',".,t,4 . 'ty -,u,::,'V.70..;4•:.k, .....(Q..,P. ..; .,K-,-.:....,1.': 494.,'&.:.) ...: ;. •i jc-,-,-„,_40 , i ),,,,, 111'.. -...1.1 ...,71-i'„ 4','"ti• i !''''. ;'','.: .'!0'' ":.. ''s,,• •rg. • :;••--'1-1"4'4i, `sit'i.."' •'•. . • - il •J•t.f.t ,..: y i ... i•.'s•t• ;-.-::...,;.,-., ••;:).'.1 .[3. I:: .111.-. -: 1,%.0 .-.'• .. „..,.;•_11:t ,; -•*.-- ;, '-; , • :..-Al.4, • • P. 1.,... .'•'..'i' .:27:_-7::-.4!--a:,' .:::•• 1 6 ., '1 II 4.1 11%im•'',6 ' '. .. j.T'':j'..fr_ ..ki.f.1..:!..'.7.)0,.;.,;#1);, . ,.%••/': T, h •• 1%., ••.•':'.,,•tA l', t.,4 )....;):),',,.•. .Z.-i).•ti::',Ii,...)„..A."-, AO, " . ? Ili'I i ,..I.I'•••-X "-, 1,..1),I=:.).;) tir6 1 •• - ter 1.:_t,•:-.•-,i ---: iSt•;rt.'.:. ',1 ,1 1 w n'4 i-.:. i.... .•I• \.A.4?-,-,:''.z.1,;:.:?*.:Ai 1,:)\ :f?:''.11%/fi''7"•:. •.''....-P,/IV.r'• . :., vi'831.1'1,., . ..- , -:/::.-1A.N •/, ..,.. ,i1:.,., ..-_-:_j_ IWO= '....,•.,,A3:1.1.A'.• /•-•-•(::•• '.'1; '''''..). IZ .'"•::)' ."' .•... .,,,,..!);.!::,• - •• ,.te-p4 .q..//,. . , a. i'.' . V•1.1.V•--.• :.':,1'• k,,.,. ..V_V-- ....'Apsi.,.:.. .or,f,--•,! ' •• " • '1:. ''''1*• 4 : ' .. • i • '.''',':‘'Clt•—......•..'••.'"...-4.• ,-VZV... ......';,;'rr:,- :'!:,-4 uliM•.• "--':',-,..,-.0••.,••,....;,•{:..; ,..--:-.---p• :•4'....1- 4,,,4-.•-: •-, ''•-, -\;')Ai.F1 ----Ai-I.:, Iii,i),,,V?.....c.-5. 5.2'.1)••,,I.,- ••••;,1,,,,, •;;.:16,.... -, ....t. ''',.i':!•ilfkl.....•-:.i..,',.•‘,.'!"%i I --- ilLf.'-W-:. 1...T.• .•I.ii,T,' t,j:e...•:'...17.•:•:;•,..• -,;,:•:.:f..re IL , ..,. ,IT•6,..,•,:<,..„,..... •,_,.p.,. ,.. ",.''',.'• • !;•!.i 1 .,:.r- '•....!'•1,...::.'•:.•L'il Tit,!.,•'),A' '1''Ai'?Et'-----11:‘%,"?...,..•''''':',i .ii-;,.,.. •.'.i , • :. ,..11.,(711 '1,1 :, ------4, -, , 0, "- 2,,I'lli.,;•:,' 1,,,, i:,./ii,../:'.. .. .1 ... : ':tie•,4 V,.,-.,,, , •••••, ,,--.•-•:,.,?.:;71k•',..,,,..-,-,.??-VV%-li.:,..1: -. ••••-2- • ‘-'-.-;.-:--,-,.r,... -ifT.,•ii.,:, Id :- 1;1.2:: -...•.. k•,‘•••••,. .,-•::„.,,,c,', 1,0.'l'.',1 ) --:- ......---'•:::'.,))"•I.-1' i•:;):••••••,:l . W•Ig - ii,r,r,! -, )4.-.:,..,... i••',..-s, 4.-'4,, ,tii,:\;.,A-_,...)I•'4'. , , ,,,,.•....:•(,, I: :1--- : Alb . et ih-••••••--.--.;.•:--? :..L.::'::•:_-‘'''-F...-ki ...:.,,•,.:,u . ,.;••••%',";r. s'.1 • ••••1 i I i'e..", '''''. . : ....::-j.........,..,,,,:"'-. ,--3,:-'-',Ngll: :-,' • . • ':.:r4c: I •''•, I ! I, -• •-;, --- ,-...'":'•;,L:::-_- a4.• ) ;.):Y.1• ,,451,' .' 11.1 ... .i In 1,,,,•. .0. .. :_, 01 .._.. .....,„ .,.2, .., .. ,,,.•,:,\\,,t, 0,1 :6!•••••§,:i:7-4.':- 4,f 42H',6,41:'; .- A•:'?iji1J.,4.1 XV:— :"N. ‘.1 ., : ..::!I 1,.' ..(. ' • • ----- . ."., ;t..,.4...,••' ,• •'-•,„it,j• ::,-,-/...,y....r. •V,' ..••• -''.. i..:;-' 1.i. • , .) -‘ ; •••,1•.•',. 4.....,...,,,?..-•'...•,,,,)• • ,.,11.,\.•'.,' ., :I , tote i'...' - \:..p,-. • . 1. ' V-7.-'11 ' ' t--• ••:"',.. i" ..14.-11 ,A...-/./ii,s, , ...,,•,, • • 1,,,,.- ,-. • ,. .....-., .A.t• •'.;, . •-', -.rs');.:`,,t-A') ..,,,,.: A,1,„ • I.,•,.; . A AP',• 1-.,, -4, ,:....,. .. .:,,.,...,-, -:• •,-....! ..V, .. ,-. •.:.',..,c; ':,,:'''‘'''Ns'., „.,,,,, .,, ,:, i y; , , ,,.,,..k/•;•.:. :4.,•,..:-:.'; , :,:•' ". 1,, 1,,,,,41,1(;,-'0. ‘`• .:C.t.t....,,.,-'7,1'‘,,)_ : "',/ ....--3 .,••,..,k.. ...:1,..,,: :•-..),•,...••;No ivw.-. .....:• , . .:.N............-.,: ,..t.;,,,:"...-- ;.',:..;‘, '-''\---,„ i',)A :,,,?.u,-OS k:.;,1•,;y.„4,. ..'475'..eitfn.,,.,i,..,-.T.----"':,%.1 ,•:',"Y_,.., '1'1...7'`, ,T4',"•':,::',''. .'i •''' ':-.,'J4•.'\ :,... i ,11 --''''•-\'' ''`,7'S•-';' --),--.r,-.."'''.','.',;•','--2'4'''': . .)... .. (..2, :••• '•'.4.) .',,: !“'..., N•*:.j ,,!-A.;-,.-,. .-‘)P.)'.'..n.1,--‘,;' ) „..... ..„ .........:.. ---\..x, i (k.,/,..,...:,: -. ..:‘,,,z.,:t.,,,',../•''.7,.‘: I''•_••:...kiinr . ....,•;.... .,.:1,„•*/. ,,,,,-•.„--= 11 .I, ••.•,. -1;',,,,,:-.-, /•(' K....,,,00/ ' ,,.,. i, ,:i..,..::.-: ..4 ..1:'-':-A...2,:': •.; '•:;',...;\.,-n..,-.,,...\'„Cf ;;-.:k..1„....;:.';':11::‘;:::' :: :If\7.)•_ y----':-.?;-':---l'er":'1•‘'`J.'•_flr):11,...,---.:;";:i. • !.`kiI9ri....:-E.4i...::;•!;:ir' ..":1:. f,14.V::,.........,. -.(., , ., f..,. .,.....,. ;-.•.,._ .,:,...,., ....-.----45,..A . .,,,,//:,. r.; ,,,,o;„, •:;„,'---,,,..i,:-.--,--.--- ,-.A. ''S..-Fr-,Z-A,c'''' •::.: •• tt,0•,.. .''',-4':-.-;- r.\ ' • .4ti Ac.,,,..v.,)„,.-%c4 . r.f..:\ .-, co'-"--,2„.., •i .. . ,.:._,••.73.r.,!,t4.1,1i4:ge.A•.,,_;,... ::.,::..:......,,p...N4..2. .__ -.---,.,:,,,, ,,,..,,,,..‘.,,,,,,2,-.<,-,sici:,”,, v‘..7..,iy.,4,./L,,.,.,:.:-.-.:. ....,,,-,..::. /-.:.1. -, • ,AIAT.I'LF. \N,1-e..-,-11r:TIR,t,. ---,''.".•• ''''''..RA:„k-.... .:' /-' i-J'''''..):.'':::. '''"•• • 7•',,..;., ::'‘'i:..i.‘'4‘, r.1. . aki.i.(2::..i,--,,...,',...-!....[,,,,,,t,:by:li --••••....-, • C. .7 ',,,\1,,:: ',.:).1:' .f_.‘• (-•..' .' "A„.fZ1- '' . ''' ',..Z.:',..?40friC"?..•A'S,.-..A.:NW,V'''' ."';7\t.. o 4. ' ","i•••••:.:'zrq,.„i,,,,...:11 77 .....,We, \ ...,..... ",!;:''''•-v-i% '''.. ••%\..':,s:.,45'9',.(t ''. '-':: :,Y,:,/x-.71,r1,.--...),.:,- ',,, :-;i!:,,,:. ,,,:•,----, ii,. r.,...,'4'1.4 wing 14 ; :,,\\.1- V .1 ‘Z,- t<••-,', A '''''''-' '• •... : • • 11 7.'' (1"I' 'C' •'• s\\ '''l :5‘''-: ---4•04.. ,• :.'c''....;-1;.; ' '',C" -,f',--.TT';,, ,:-- V - . 1 .....;:.iy t' l'• '''''!"\••kf,f-.11:: .-;„/ •c•:•N!: A ,......'":"'••....,-•t,.'. •N,,,,‘•-•.;A. .‘:$ -4,us\C ' A':,.11,•\4:'•4. kt=4;; :. ', ullA. ••-•,i•it!;.i.:'N; 44/1 c'''''?:0 r•VI. 1.z.$::•::. 'I. ,•4.:-.a.,-,-, -,,..-. : ,,,..i• „,..,,,..:;......: ,. '12:7\. -‘,S 4, ,,.!-,\...C', ‘p:. ','.-F..---1.•i'.,......__,::'.'41.I" 1;:.:.:7\s: ,' :.•,Aii--. •..':.:'‘'..t,,...,'.:.:;..`;'N.:7'7,-r'Z,.;,'',-; '',-..\- ..._, .k;',.i',';17:.• !IL'4.,'.4';'!•'. ,4,i`g".H4;i-'-' 11.),....7 A,,,. ...-..gni' wai/ v, ;t h•:.- -,,,4":.'lit":';''Ck. ../!:••":).% ?:'.‘,,,1 1.... .., ;\ .610i 14,..:„.-,-.),,...,,..• ,,,.;,.;., , ,,„, ,. ...,cif;I. ;0,..k11...,',.:12'.:,‘,'N•-;••:Ir..% ,:';\•,, :,-,,ikt,.",-4I:',....`1--L..y.._\:•.-.,;,_.;.L _6;4,444....4-al..'.," i".,':,*,,i-„ .5:.;,,,--,-;:kc.;.f.ii'l.,b:,,,,',..\:___.„-'''.'•.I,- ,A,1 .., tio-IF (. ,: \...\.. ':.-''— \ \'‘v,( .„. Tc:5F, •;;!:77,q,7!".t'a,. -.-4t';'•:::•.477'..:7' ''•••!1*Pi 41,A''.'''. (.`'' f.:•'• / _,_„.....:''',{,VS .:4;;:'.! .S.t.c,,V,.';‘,Ci.'7',.1)1,p'‘, lifigi ....-,-).:. '''''....n.....: '-.': '' '. . ' '. ,-144*•,1)./gt1::'i . '''''.•• ''''..-Z,':::-!"'Arf,tii.t.B,..'.i•'‘ ..--'' 7.'.,-,..,,''. •' ,,..,.V.,'--4-..i:i'',1.- ..,..w...,.. '....'•7(741.:7;•-_,:aii.:,;:2,,,,r., ;:`,. .'•'" 1...1/VI.,• .....k„.:1'1,2:1\4";2f.t..,'",7., .:•':, N'',,.;....1:%.';.tc-sr'•,":'''4i..-.\‘'14g0=,. Y.....7. .....;i_..../: - ...1:-.---, .. ' 'A .; 'M fi:,.f.'.',,\,:.:14,),:kAa..,.....-...). ..e.- •.;-...,.6.,:tf.j...r,-;!,t9p.r.„at,...,..1:: \ '...''.1i':::1);\:::-'h,"\s'A'''''' '' .. c.,...:,,,r,,,. ..,:r.,„...),. -f'''......‘..4:4..\\\\A.,:1::::,11:.;:4.*,,i'.1111::''' :,‘.:,,,\Oc....-„,klr:i;:::Lli.-^01:,.....47.;_i;,;:.! wiNik,, ,.,........,....k..k.,-),.\,.-..11•:: ::::4,....'-•---„.....,. .: i:,.i. .\\:. . ''''A':.''.'A.''''"" `"N.,t,... .:‘-'°•)-.,,:r.•-`..'• '''''•:"' .(k)....--: '•'''''''•-4- ,..:ill.' ..2r.--,V,17.\\11'k'i.P,741.11-1'.4.1'1 iill.:,ditk '1•1--4!...‘,41.s.EV, -3.• ••• LI !!:., -.!. . c •••!.. \ E., 1 •;.•',,,..;.::• .;••••,..f\•\•,.,„,-',',...,.,,,,i'''.•• ,e,c._:...-,:A.1,.., , -i.-:.8.,\ •-- . ;;?:-... •11."..,,-,-"'-'!• -•'' - ',...4,••;f:';'. '..!• ..,,."-• "ti,-'....cf. '.',•• •-:• •:--.-•• ; ••). •••.' •• •• .•.• '". ''Ali--7•••::- ''•:•*X-'. 14)..'-''''•-•;-';';'....;:-:•:'.:5,--;:";;:...,A,,:.....' - - -'-•-' •• '7..-;7o-c'4.1';`.V. •119 .:-Flt>.'....',. .,:aw?:-.J. ::, ‘".:7:'.-:::,i,•'.k.!;.:,•:;.:``i:_:(9'; ..,';: .... :,....‘Y:), • IL::: .) •:7.---7.:Ft.4 .,":/;;',..;h1,,,,,:ma tt ,::.‘,,,..,,t,,..yr.„)...,:r..,.......7...,.... ..:-....,..-...i.-. ,,.....;!,..!),,..1 ...,,,-,...t)i.,.-77,,,,11:111411.t:".,,,),'.;:itisrtHil;!.i7,,,,•,:4,,,r,..,(1,;-,‘,,,..•i.,t:::::,,i..::,..1‘, .•:,:.::::::.:7..,\A,,,,1!?.........1.,.,.11:•,.,.,.k.,,\ N.,\:..: .7,.........„...,...... ..,1•N\se..1 J..',,:.%r:...•\.."...- ...•,. .i,..,(......-1--,r.... ,r•,'...........1.,..ig'.''; i?!).:',,,,,I.,-, Atom ,:. \*,f..4). ;:..,:ti--:,...°,.... ..!........... A\7....''.. ' .. .L,. '...F....... ;•. ..,:.•,.:•: . -'. .et•;...7‘..... . .....--::' ,„ '' :----'i -• .7•. ,... .::IN „,,,,..,A' '‘,1.,ul'A..".".1:1•1:-'`;,!:' ••'' ‘,.. ''. ', • . ••'- i* ' -...- .... ' ':':.'''': --;--'''.'-' 'N',(4.'1''' %'''',S,,,,.-'- '''''2-,, "1'14,,', -•-•.:-.).:','):..,,,-&-,,..":,,,, ,It r_.',-. '-o.',"1 -'4.--,!'"' \' ",. -(1'n'`,.'i ,,,,"\., '-. ..i" ....... ' • •:-...,,,,,,,,V.' ...4;-:;.,'.1•:.1?,i4A;14:',. .i.11-1.---1-.. :-:::--,',`,.1:-17:::.,:),,! a.,.11 ,-.§ •;'!• .:7„,;: -., ''',Ifie.-3,I,P,,'... :-.16,-.. -.• .... .. z_:„...„.„ ,A.,.. ...„...,.....,..,,.,.....,„, ,.___„.„,„..,,,,,,.-, ,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,p,,,,, -.....?,.. •-,-- ,,.•-..,,,,,..,,,,-,...-,,,,, -,.- ,,, ..,,,,K,,,,,,,,,R,,,,.. . ._,,, : , •- ,,,,,,,‘„:.,,...5A..,, ;.,\'',1;NAI:-X .;':c.. -:''•:`-.41'; 4.'''.':;•-•....„'" ..' - •,L,.•',P'.1.:A..^%7,-;11 .'i • ,•,111,..../ ..',..;;.,.; . '',I.,',.:4?''-)T_-__...,,.._...;',..,,..11-.';, ......_..,-.4.pm,:,;,.;#0',..tria ... ....-:,_.1 . . '''':..;t•t4' :::7'•;: •::-1;'!"-•:‹47-• .r''''A''':,11.'ili-:'''''''.":',;:lik, */ifrfj..1.:\:\i•-i:".--'''''TM,i;:.'''''.-"1-irr ..,44.ilii--7.7.Z .Z4z;7.4.••,,•.=,•,-1r.:.?0/Wtill BM •: '••.• R f.,••... ,,•.•. ••'.,,,:..:, f±,71.',I•-...: •-•,.., ...(i•-''',,z.N.,. -.•:--' „-......!•'..- "''.:4•;.4„.!:. .,•:::.-•]-4.•-•••• Ili IP ki,,,,i'-'74e a-:tA"g4rikk.:4'.,rt,-,--rt,-;,-:.34,4-. •;•z:0--k\--,••,..,•;,., !Iffemo LA.. . .....: \ ,....t\ t-i-5-•.." .-.....:.:•-. --0,,L.n .,11,.,:4,:,„!q..,t01,, -/-• .---,. i- ,f,"flit--,-.7,:,•-•!1:! =;., 1/;•T• :q ' '-. -:-„fit42,C.,-,:•5-a4.1".:;f14-.',..-411-\' -,1.„:-.40z4, 4,',;;,.':-,,,,NI ilft. . ::l',6:....'.'7.1..,....,::....4-.,...,,v.•:',.‘•.,:-....,-,,,,v,:i-k-,-.#4.----„, - •---7.11: p A.._,pri,..,._..;- ::- ;al:-(,,•::,"4,-.4.•• ,--,c-- -,-.-Ii.;-.4A:.---K-;,,g2. 7.-: -••.:,.,...„,..,.. ...,wiA,„„,,,t,l. ph .6,1 .•. _.•:. .. .,.:.....,,:,vi ',..ri :•-;‘.....„44.tt .,.--tc....-;,.2.--.• y, a -•' :1 A......--_-"'''q.."• ',if,'TN'.131 , ..,,......;:::•.::•':;:.,;:,- ,..;•,,,v„4„1•••...,:c ,•:•,..„:... ...,,,,4,--.•,--oz.mot • •fe ,,,,, .,0-my. • . • •.--:,,-.••••;•.'• • tie 0;( ,-;-•...-c..i•,. .;••. :•;-...1,,.3.c• , :, , ij i .L-7,,,,,, ,-.1•:1 :.,--,.--zii :•-)...,.Ili v.4....,,,,.-.: l'7-N, ':.---.1.:-..-J:,-,,:-..7q.:?,,,-,;,;?.;:•.:::' ,. -.... .. ,,,,-.''44 ''''Pi'ir!,44,A• ,.-2,,.;...;:,:..::=,•,'.t:?: .,.!,' . 1 --It' -•.$1.:-.:1.-,,, ":" .0..,••...„ 5-.. ,....0 '"7...-- 4 i.L,,I...;.__. •.''.•,I.,•;•_;;, .., ..: . .. ...-;•,,,•,..•,..': .'.•• •.••.1..;:-.41i,„-2,It..414'..,I..,7: -"---,..., ....-..:...-4-.=;..„.•;.•:-ri7-,,.....,,INCt4 '•,\;\k :::.:-,......,...--.,.....:•••ny. • ••,:.•.4 •:../••,-5,.!. ,...c;..-1k.'"1-..,• •• -....:.A..1,„..„.;,,,,-- „. ,_-----.-•, •••'•;, ,:i-p".•,\•••\•.•' ;:-.,-;',....:,2%-t.:;)<5.: ,,-,,,,, ,,i•";•.•-•:,,.„-•'4,7,.'i".'ir!,..--•:"'.:.• -,,,,. .. - ,-,. -1. .Z?...... ',).,;,:.•;•.:._ •.- s.;';'•1'.:•.'•• ..(3•1••••• •••••••-* ‘..,Y,C .-::•-••- -.:1•Iii7,--r.*...---.-717-.7 -• ,i,:rii1,-k.--,-..',..:1.,‘1.; --i':'...•'•Jr'',„_,-,-.--;•...,, . ',., - -4421111 ,-, •Q-st./.W-1.;.•;41,'!..,•,•-•&!14•• (C.11---.--!' ..2.,,, .4 ., ,,_,,*.,•_.. .-:•.,":.A-,l'..,7:7•?,S44:'2 ).••••••a'?••/.'''--p-.=AT"----'14-''' V,,,,,,i. 19.,NA:',i ;',...'1:1, ...._,I',&:_c'Y.t.../,-.,:.• N,,Ny -i: I....,•,:.•;.-:;,1:,,,.•..:, .;,•••••-•tmet, ..424:-.. To-7-, .'-';1.', .."-LIZI'sr,-..•'- ---7';•:••;-.:-•,,.....":;;;i1,47 ..,-;:r.i. ,' '',11-,i.:•-• -4.1, -..---...te ,-" IL'X'.7',1 ' •s*4 41.,i''.;%::/ ?•::\ '.• ' >.---",'' `rf.''''.0'.'"Y'- ?...:'.1.P '.--rif.'1 . ".. , ;,-•1".:....-":':'•: c:' ...:.....(1:://16.1 r .,..._.L., .., . ,..„ . , ,,si' f .11,t44...;• . ' i'''''. r ••'10.'' k'-irc..-.f•r---' I lutlemb•Ilt".. : .t. N ',•v 247401‘is., _ ••-...'",•::'•7.'••:,-.c. ',,•••".,`,,•. .,•-*, . . .;.1.-;; r;•• -t)1,••• i'...,;.: ..--/ i ‘ "c...,:,...'..J.;.7'•.:.1..•:':i,:':•:;•:,-....;.,.1:......'•i1;,',I,:',,,-•-;-\,NF,•-•.:.,•:,.::,.'.,•, .1..-',,•I,ma,m,,i,,i•,,i„„i„ii-'P.3 9.,.,,,--.,,,,it.:,h.-,.---‘-•,-,- -.-.,,.flJ , ,;:„_li2,1,.••-,.,\,,' rJ•• -;•._:,,::z.,i.,-1..,N'...A,".„.,.•.:•.•_•••.',....-:...',,,. .n.„, sD__ir_ fi.triLi‘...'-•,•.r.•-•.fi,,.,,gg,h„,,,,r .y1t,-,l rr,•ii,a.-a;.•!ci-,tl.i•-.-,s•,,•.,,'.•.,,-•,;,„- -:..---,-,•I.eAf-L;r..._. ,....• ,-, '\ , <T k :- 'A gy Ira- .-•,, 1 -. • %Obi;br,,,e - ,,, ,• .. , •.,, . ....,,,,T.. . ,,: Ili.-. a,,A*V., . • 27 eh, .- k.44., • i..- ty :....c,"...(:•1,::•7' 'IV.'6 I '• ;:.iV.i' '1 i. \ I .[:----- .1.•-(4, . ^ ."- . '''29'.- ' W4•' •• 11 "16-.111 ' '. - '.'''' ..' :,,,. 4. A 4.• . ., .I 7:..,, ..r..:•• •Eirr.,..,,,... .. ,,,..4_.,,,, ) ! 1 •mo T 1 t 140 ' " --•','pi....?'('...(I -:. 'izi:.!:"•''''/- li\ li ...5.L. t'..il j , : . , ," '.- ' 0 ''illt..q-..) •,-1 il - 't" .-- J ' - .• • .I 4.3 i.:r V.' '---77:•: k•'.:: i 0 ...,: , i, , ' • , . . ''',:-....:-.44 7.51'=,..2. -.' : r.t.', ,il'':. .' • ,,- ii ':,)?..4;,%."--t,-- .•i , 1.::', -.',I:.,i I..,.- „,:-. 1 ...,•,',A'1-4-. .,‘.-:.. -.... • ••••,.• ........, •• . .. • ' ••.,.Nz.• ‘,s,:,/,-,,,,,;,1 i - 1 1 ii p,....pi ---„,./ i 17,15' DUIrdailliSh 4ir if;,..indslide Hazard - " '..-4.'.--i i„.2.-, - ' •P--1 ----- -----`,‘ Areas h'..?.:0 ..,---' .•-( . , 1•E,,.,& : •i',c.,,-)-1•11.1 , t• '1•i-2'.-1' -, • . • • • • • • \\ ;x^r- ' 'F. '�ti a ..: '(�j''"i :l I-6, }�',�-�.��•'J/yy ?rL..T g t .i`L "v5\ A:i t:A� 1,,,, ?,. 0 . . �,J t+ ,Y ,: Pt1v.- 7-III: ,'•1�4.:"es�';�.,il�-' :�: �''. P- ?r �S],�li;;/ -- _ ;: 'tb ., ' 6 �' - ::L'i" 'P ,.f� ��•' � �'• _" ,f e//Vs`-�� Y. � i,y�::. ,7• � i`r� . `ITr' I •! ;,-' i• 11 :,:L.(....rl 1 S\ /.:",/.. !:t': . {�1._ `i-.4.-- :r;{' l."`. 7. ll 1j (4- :►.'Yiir E .111 1„1e i!'..114 ': (;;- !_ ?'1' y: �p� -1 rr'i7'' "i7 rc� `r.: `` +`.Iti' 1/ -. •<t • .• \`\-�.ly '1.. • yl. t._ fit-.t . .: ._:, :.1!: �.47:r...;: t,... irll• �:`: C 1 •(_':� . ',,,fir ,i eP.: i -;I .�'<, Jr, �� _ :1 - 11 {. r ,; ',._ta;✓'' ` j" ,.I i 1.: '];i 1'i+�"°.1 [ ..,>i.� ,I�: ,• di_.;� • ,a.t.� _• ..�� ``SI•` l.+-r"-�..v`l tl_•% l'" )k , .:�.li c 1, jr ` ,;,'r••, l:': J-.I- ):_. �;• ` 'j:, }� , :l h. •. "yR tom' 1„�. 1 .,.1 :"{. :r. \� �ij ,, ��.f"� ''1:1•M - �r'�:Li'il ".l (�.1 ,. '-.�.•''1,7y., .tom=\•.�:,.. ;f} --',+; �.I 111!'' "1`•�Y.•1, }"�.t;t; ^%i i ,1" ..� • i` '�f� • } ,a\ I_ r./• r l '�. ,. n' '-f'{' }l tiipi..,.r •, r' �a {' j I G. I, -` l' f�.1, it - . �� ':..:�._�•Ct. •- . .� L' • -t—,,.,.1��.. ! : v, •_ tL.[•,c iiu1 }::.r ': !t,.f. 4 :IIi'i _ ._I:-:.r. .1�,\':" ;,". .. _ :":,.' -- �.' f-- _`�'.'-'' ` i ,�` (1I� ��•zj.r i:... I ....x �i..•, `. • .\\'�•�,-j'�i'iT I• ��I,,}, \ y. "� r._ l...I;..,. r+ ._::��y,...� .. \; \' is I!,`I .., :,',::,r_ �'. -�-1,..•". , )) ..�: ,fit ;l _;• ' . r�' L :.>(:' a'•'+.. `ti : :._-aI_• Y':,( ,.., .j> '(�`/, �:'::;, ;� - -t-';;•�'i--i: ':is'.......cJ �-f-�� 1 �` -1"1 _ F,�' p._,�_s,,_-.__ _ ' •- `,{16:".:�� ,•• ( �'�� ig. �r1', _'it; ,ry„ . '{i jd.r e,r : / 1 �{. \! I ,1111 .1'1-1..' ( r, .� 'i�j,,-.1-- � `( 's,, "°' �✓,- ;'i. !�I�R..f,�,:}r ;' t: 1 Lr i.: -.'!� '�.r•. )j: :�' '�:'1 '.`'ti,„ ,•:1'' • 1>.l'.. /h, .l F :,;.„.. _'*-`:.fc' :,rr • {I'•; :rs"' Jy:'`: lei C'•1 F �` ,: -. ' r gfyu; L'—'.1i:Yr��{�l� ��:J r:,i ( i{!. .[I I`� ;:'^j+i:!11',�',a � 1t1 1 '� •,.,.x A. /--�-�"..._, \�d .i L - ;er._:•,_✓' _-4,4t:P';JI',: G,'i'� y! \ .1•,n-'! mil',I.—. 1� -r • _ • r ,.1. ,• `,•- `11,0 i-:I %r. 1 ;‘ 'I': '•fF :- -.�.1IL!`^___',� it Y ' � •6}'.s.8_ :1'a�..=�,l ��.p: (,.i .. j�; 1..5' �f' �'JJ o'r/. g - a,T-=.( .1�1 '.�.iij' '1 'al ll' :I_:��-:iw.,l i,: , C•a ky. •' F` :%1.•.._. ` `�\ ``�.j ,.' .tJ- .5r ,t 'i'>:. .. - ':7•. rl :: '/ i'1. L�7�'' ..�.,:.". ��,I • !" 1 .. .. ••!1. ..r Fa,t��' ' --�- i, .':7 !1• r' k:�:`.l ! :,._J _:. '}`' 1`i '-,Y. `t�'lJ:- fl";y ,'�,{gj�.:'; I I,.�,'�.'i _ :�� .;:�lf ..'7%'F: .wl 'tt. :j i'� •(:' F;il"•ir .S,\,,t F"•.. S1`%p _ •..•�• _ _ ' l` _ ti:�+ yJ,' .. •.Y' • 111',.....,- i\,/.,(l: '' 'A' I' e _ �y -• kyJ:%: .Ail111 '. ') }T`1I�) \�1-' \ f L '!'��::�q$. 'l` 1• 'I @i I. Sc°_:Pon �rmiali•. ',' _` " !f:_ 3! �", wY ,: •25' _ •• •• yr�"f}:'. ''"I`!'ir' '7-` w,c-{. _ r_ e,,msdr.•.M' +:''IY: •l ,:." ( i Yli~:3 _l: • ''t =-'`yy - ^- • `ice • ,,. 'S' ��4 •.r•Y3\.�' `r.°Fr' ,i. � -? ..Y' �'r- • l� p Vim^. u:, ns `.'',�..�� r.^ ita.zy y7it enrrr.r: o �, „F)t:" ; -.1 • ri ' -;�'X-1 k-_. %a.z-le�•\-'y ,' ,� •F-;�1 � -ems',-,,•,;;+,;fi\•:_ _ �"t 'lf , _L.z1 /A -''; '1:'f :`; \ ` x` ;i ': '�ti.: '"4!''i r': M�.,�•fy• k.?.1' j:, fl`• .< r .v 't °1<k. : ii °.. T . ti 1.F1...;r�L• ;'-'r • r:' l! •l 4:i' 't:'':":- i I, '� .!: '` l' :a` ,' .\ •v i' N2:V. _F• l ,tQ ` j t i{; ' :• • .. A I,,u;:lain • ..;\t•! •� T.,5. _ '''-,�'�4; - .:* i,\,,4 y,.�ram+;a`�sr,_„TTT;_' rr:.. '4 i";•t f`�\r,..� ;l ,:r: ,_JV : 'T1,1�� '",T•' rl F'' ?Yi.: .4.,J a4,�.t ..<. '"'.a`,,Z. l.. '^ c''^-' jl,, ., Li.i .�,,, :i A, '�... ,^i': ••\'„ .•r4 _ A 1.:.i,,4,.R+..,7!,V4 . - .S.�.• _ r`� "La '�.). is rc•\':. :y„-,a::,�,pus�,r.. -r �\1s...:,z=•r,;�." - p: -.�� - r".,. `a•. i. 'AY „`;. rvr z�..... .,:�_. ��-`'9'.y.•�•:,•�. :�.., r��.'t ry, ~"' • / /i � " -''Y :�y :�`�iTf' �••':rY i''1 fur. 1. :arF:,�,7� iM <.a34.1r.' _ -+ i :rb. ,. .. hnrn- k" i \t ) ..14 �I''i �• .. 'I:�'}�'� i . ..i" ,.yii,'�F,-"'nc;�: • ,: ';: !��'=j i:;1�.-1 :l. r■■ I:� ,,:7- ',..A, r:� / �71 _ 1I • •:... ti': ,,,,,, .,,c '-. .i1:', r''y ' ;"•, ✓ -.• .•1 .tl:▪ 'f1 r' '.: �■ *:r. __x _.--...t�T. !Y ,-':d^- �.1. : .S jf- -F.`:, ' t ,x�.�1 t¢n � �''.1�'r3''. "��i� �: -}� 1i ,/Yap E'k e•" e .,I ,gRE�:•7.0,-, 1<",., :. • ��`,, .�� . 1. :el , '' 'r•'•� Sri; :r �.;�` :,z;l�: ,•:+" .-.�;":,��;,-y •T .; (��I�Jt�. „ -It i1,.� l.i.��r `,�• .ai.. "i.:,..., •jfjj1;��-, `-1�,j),1r•� �21 ��+�-�, <^t,;j�,�7y, .�,\•-r+it l: :K, .L "..1 _ - r r '(, - I•": ::,-'[:ter' i ('� y .417.1r:!. ., . .:- a :.,z-1;4 -- ,'Li]_ . •-_ • 1 .".":——..rh.a:�{—y. ...'�� A, ''.I �Y Q ! ,•t :....; .;\ 7 3;, t! ,yam; .i _ :;; f' � `-'•4,"y`?1��SI'`,:'� ,i I. _, ':) 'l •'F.._.:'•,.... ..':,.:r� }Wei _ '1 '-/ — ',f.,'� 4y, r , :'IF,",-,..,; .,. .....:.-r% � .yl � �� :�'�`1.1, _ 1? /t' q•" + _ '4:a.0 d�.° r �%ir II ;'T-!`:�.,1+ 0,,... 1\l: S. ".�l'(� � - �' /r��,e-.t�:{.;)' 1 '��R':��_:�,y, �;��`•.'�'-�::. •r. 7':t :� �,L� ',. "tC�.'F',-11i::`v. �,w.'rr .: ,'_ _)=. 1; ''Xra /.-. r ,•• ..N7 I'+' ",_"n CCC' C. '"�i'')1' -. �' 'i•�? •• - ;+la-^% t', k t ili I. �l/ . \ \ � � tit: i 5i f ti { i, • T },�y„1.`1 .:.. .ice sX � "ir r?. .i.74.- . :71. '...7....-;,1..1-',.,,Ir';';,..,::.-.. !MIN' ---.1"'". 41-1':-.:,-;:;-:1 - -.'.1-••• ';'....••_:.':,;',..:)Y....7.:.77.! ,i;...•• .4.'.„' li oe?..,:.''!`is.q---- . 1---th:-- '..',,, 00;i fc : -'i .` gib : ' — '2.'4, 1 ..' • ' ' '.; `,J;„:....;:r1'.:::.ill(::'.::':: '--"'..)..':7"1;.14/.i.il-L.-----7. ''' .:.(1;:\:'::/:/:i:41:1'. 2'\:...... 1 :1!......7...- :iil....:::,,' ...,:.,.1,_.1 .....' 1_, :..\:..1,es'''11 -::::71...:' 11 L .1�3�:_-1•t-� ;). I •.I'"),' I } /"1 j i:i•, ... - -t — R "� \ �r� i_, • . ;,- . '1':.12) •)) 1. ( �q/' 1 • �.f'': � , cA I '.i ..�^�. :islide hazard maps for ®��s>4[Zg (� ^Isrnlc hazard areas. Seismic zar ' areas are susceptible wakes. Other seismic.r:n on this map are Areas i 2'i')7 3+ • .. lacustrine sediments; I r'�If.: 0 liquefaction, i; let:. \ ''?::;•:‘;;V.,„,...,..,..,,....„.,...:,,i,,:.•,..'',.,;,:.:1'i:i.'".,frt,7—:ill"iii.`,:,,...71:::k:.,:'(.; .:::„.,...,..i:_,:''',/,,1171:','": - ,z • 2,. ..:.:'.. •a!,, .,:. :,.;..if.''.1 ,,• 1._4,1;.'...44c-1,t4IT:F1 •\ .ki;. • i 11' d�i: l L ..... .`�i; ..'f^',�;7.,.: .`� ?^7''hg,' r 1.; �r • •..d' .... -•:•,.,.1, . . ..‘.., ,. . ., •:.:4, ,•:. ..1f4 i3 i` C lllll t .z< .•i:%'t�` jL,w.�-' •.�`t�� u.:9� :� -,:'t. , ' ,�'�. .:}i.,I ;�_ l,�� 'i}:�+;.j .i i _ J) r1•�)'( !^.` '? "' �'.. '� :LE' �,:�., :{''o.�, 'J.4 1• F.��. �� tZ• � t�.. \fix. :1`•l �' E 4•, x. .t 'jf1'° r' 1, _ ,'.•r ; a, t)_,1 i,''.•�u 's-• •; /A'„ _ 1`•j \- ;,t'' +., ~57:�/�- ...:.' ...v,,:`ylit. i. t• :,, _' �. „ d • : .! :. 1� r_, 1. .• e;. -,. .. t t h t.• :.:1 J. .;-` is r:;:_. ji. _.i�.-o-,7- --t- -- •�F~ i l!-:r rl-*`�� 31J5, i!': :'4`1•:�+ : '�;�;`t•r" d. ; _•:(:):,k� ,.,1.. ,. 4. 'irk'• E: - ,;t"ir l ':..t ;i�:. :-4r •,,. Will' '''�`t:r;, J. .r. • • I. it i 1, p.• y� .-,ic.�r:�.ir + .r , L.'r .� .,1,4I-':::. ',,r:�':'9 Ii�inr �'-. •�,,� _;:,, }I „[ :'-Li• :.1-1-t=L' ric'� K,.1. I 'n. l b;!}f'lJ' R;..�, a�rf:•r:., ;ii d'.-� ,..�,.---:Mrf""' :1 r1' ,.II dui -r.�t• i 9 1• - - s_/. !+' iiC w :Ic `', ,;7'-u� 4 , .ii; rl n, � ) �j t. ..; ..,• ie;7: �,�.` fir,• „ {I vie r;,.:\�y f.,J. ; I,�`I .'',r_', '.. •l'.,/•:• • t,.,r^'• 'r_l••'` 1- :•.' i?. .t ,' ',,.Via..:'' :t '.� W'',:, '�:.. L s ,1.f ram^ ' .�^,� i -` _�,,: i�''. 'Q'.'1•,n+; ,.-. .� ... './. i'. .r-. _ ylgqr, fit;- .dt•y .,;.>, ,:fir y- - .._ -\ r'r):rr'' '' .t{: ,� T'1 ` �•t�a''i i �,.=��. :,ib*.. �YK�+C, ,�i.<. "�� .1\ l:Vie.,.: r ,z i A I t.`k. l it1 a av {, J.L s; :;' i;• �' ,f.,`,.al y't .�\ .\ ::I��t • '�:!i., �.'::•'. •:r �'{J7.•�JY'-." �.+tC,l` '6' .t •1 +,4;;• ,i' ' r•-,''[�.Y.. n... f'y :.i`EJ--.-;c>.a. _�!.r i�,', -Eil "" ti.),. -ty �.'~`'i• �:M3i:" .. .': : ..�...�. .',.i?I •'yl -.I1. ,may,-::' � •(1.,, •J. _s&A! 1 „ /:; ILi: n `\� t z `LLCr[:y•t• ,:1�,I:'' ;r.�',; ) «c Y., • ..32:� ,c - .,`r •,: .. '" � L�1,;•. :ts::-. - • ,11hi.:r+; II�'I::.�ir ,`i•\� ::2':Y`-'S . . ti,� - :�,� .�' :Y``J:'.� '-;-.•r!;�s'�r. :,•r \I �}\( .ri,:,: +. Fit:5,,: 1 ':.l'` J". -:S.. . s•�yy , ��1 ••tY_�1t''.✓ ''14 :7, :F,�Ly•,�H�rs _ .,,,.„, 1:-t.� t}f..l Y+:1s, �/.. • ; --`' .. : /id .i. '. •;r '1 "^y?;{.: �i� :•r`y.t�` 'S�,i'ic, - - „.7._��;;' _ 1�.I: • ::-` _4`b-• .r, ▪E. 1s!*• k ! I. fYr II'. ,6: ... • {•-,.... t � ( { ;I \,YZ( • 1 +' �ar:.' _;''t'a' r'.;yrs __ •. d c�.'. :,''C•n 1.1, ,h:T:-1 S:y:�) u ___ • •II y ••1: tip:- • '�: ''R: 44 .;.f; J I; 1 3.. "7' .. ! -•\• `'�• .`'�P.- - .Q.J. ,/'y`:,a! a� •,• rN.` ,,l - 1y1, ..tq'ga 'u 1,r_ 1i.: _ \ro S;•• t.,� - ;r� �%NF :.�..•lt...-'�`� .:".r�.'v, �o.' 1 •...... .._:.'�.,. .0.1' th ft ' �i"- r � ��'.e: �..,�•. d :y :i1: .r .sal, {,,:, }_ 5�4 :.tic ,. a. L 1'� F }/«' s::� .. 'o-. 1;;�., 1 -- ;r`, �_�,.,, _G • �' '�` �,��_•: .y,r .�;!�_,1 t f�j1 i �•',_ :.y�"9 Jr'- � i �,t�/'�,• 1 'JI. y`• ,L>nG , .i: r re _N ,..Frr, , f'\ ',1?'^.',.,,•. •r.` �,i .. ;:.,'{f"•.� ft ' ' ' t 'n''! +,I; 'I�. .. ..n .. ., r. ..ti�:.. _ .'yi. Gry, }ia,rr.lA — t. .i. � p �h �'"-d'�,+� a ��■� _ `•1. I r 1.:�Y iLL • 'e�T .1• .' .', 'l,;- .P j:, .;I•,"; - µ ';1"�6 ,4 . Tom.. 1 .r:: _ MM��"�� gII "'{ ,1,�rk�S'a; 7,,t. �n.;;,�{,'i''-!t :1. .:!.•-t.:r 'r.� _ E-r,;:.:- #oi _, ]$,Y•'+o .�: { :Ii, :{: --- - ' '.k',f, .7 - \ I;. •rr; � ,fir L:'• .{; �.� - • ,i.;i,:}�: .1 ; .lp, •, p� �6'ti 'F�+F:�,...�Y},_' ',a,J - a. 11, ;.�"f-: :�.,.• .ul� .i•"1�?,�. e. .' ... 1 M.�.," � •- • .�.:vl ';,,•'..1 d''J ix_� ,";�s.;;Ya �t. .,,a •'•T`l ��' - ' :r, r,:�(.+S:.._ .._'IiP' i a : r'Y_ i• '• .ou.:. a�.:.,; �..ti.S �. ' .':,. L' •%� _ 414 • • ,.( N:n;(CI r o" :,`,''r. J .. _]' 'Hi; ti NY_. ry�„ .�.<y ::):..y,45 t•`;,. ie r ,,1•,:',i.`.,..,.' ' - - N� i�?i 1',!J t �n1 • III 42e � .'•:„ 'l. •:.01 {':1. k.l•�y _ `. .iJ is ,:..:`„ ';-_ -...,- .I`r' •- ■fir, ...11-,• TI i,' • 'if, l._ '-«r. ¢7.•--c' �1:'1' x 'ic7,-',,:T: i"� '"•-'' '•.;'..". �'v- fWs '' '': ram • : .'t. it •%' .: .'4S'-1: jam'•y. ..(�' -�:: •4. • :' ,�1,'' ,Y' .:,,,1, - J` :,1 'I.2 .:.1 .cr. - 3L , �r �•-t;i `r. '�.. `l v�•. (i' .k,:. :,' i .,c``�r+• : `'{ y1 t.::�y5..�•,+ t-, -•? :ki r l- —J ,{. \� Y:� _ .�}, :��11�`'�i.,�• __. +� /{,/�,'�%.1�u:` or l,. ,L+ Y' •�,:.. `:A,o y,.`7��''�',..�•%gr • '�'... i 1.:1.'• \'.. .t;'....V.''''� -'�. � `}..W. '�y :{' 4,'•`"-"2s•''•' 1 I p I �.. '•:{f{. .r. .:]''; :,. I 'Iq r'1 yk±'� -S� ES.,,..'.. ":;l•::'. �l 1 ; : ri tf' .ill:+ -��r ' ` \.�' 1 �. evv ; it ...,..,-_,..1=: :':1- ,.:.•• r :c,•e,. !b''i..• t•';? Y±,'c`.•,,: ` ,.,-.'•.,`�'S:, .::;.; ,f•. -•I"t::afi',i c't::.•,E"-4... r. � p :iz- .�: 4- • ''•:: ti, .�.;' ..e.,'" '17_r.,-.".i:.�1c ‘-•..,.:',),--,..;? --•cr• \tF. .�„ • �+�'^'^1'. 'e7 I } e::=�� -+! y1�,j. ._i,'` _yy�*.IC�-.—.5...i:',�- ��.•,'1'�'.: `y:i''" �: "� �♦ �''}'7.>,,,:�,«,•ry�•S?`?y., �_` _ •l!:....'7-ry•' _'mot' ..r,x.'_ 7�,:'-. i ( �-• , i ,gip .�'4,`,. .+,' .` `�•„:'%, f : '1 � ;y\ ryyy"'::;iii e... .ft:1 ::t; ,��i�,-- ',.•, ,.ice-, .�' :K�`.:)" .:•.Tv� .d.' 7- -., -..-i•1 :x -�.f; "',411F1iy 7 ,,•,, �:.. 3: , ,wf':' o-'J: W.4. '� � •5� ttff •r - .'.�: �� ,S i� �`=�f',. ,�� -, fir,. '�,-;: .r..,1 �'�..r(;:� s.��.�`�-.' �,.F;4,. .ki.'_.- i;3_ r'1 If I. .S:V!' _..1 i..•.-t i yifr:'i'::.. _ rlv". 1- - .!r ;..:-:•"�i�±' .,fr'H-:{.. - (. r. y_ I! -7 1 �' ; ' sag`' Z71�--- :.'i�,/':•�:5�'7/S"• "'J.;.-*:{S:j;:.:i`:; :-'%i. Z -� 1'tr�"' ,go•• a.F' '.{ ,� Jr. -'+t'• a. _ .','r' .-�� " /¢'s,:•' .J1;,116 'V.1� 7 ( YiIL • Fr.:.1 , ,r y:. r•:1)t .I• AA`,- ..• 'r.i i I{•' It • 1k; - - 1 0 � _ lr • 1�-11 :yet,f_ to _,; '."jrj.tr' 'aa,li_ I.., IL 1 .. — .il' 'Yv , :, . • r r ; I .r., '; \r. �1 ry 4 .:! }-r . •-•(lTy_ ..rq. �'•_ .. .• . Dui arrt?<N (::2.1;7 i•1• ; ,r`Yi ?u.r5.:;10 . .: - :.-•••••••••••••••t••-••,:t•21..••-..i,•••••t•1•••-...,t •••••1,.,%•••'',...",. •. ....,.. ..,••• ,..-•••••••••,.•-•• •.-,...-••••.:-,;•••••-•,••••••:••0•:,1•t•.-'••••:2..t.••;.',':2-.,....-!"•:::1'.;:t1;•4-:•'•1•,:-..:::-f-,,..t..in••• •,,,,•'•'12,:‘•••Or..•••'•••'1::•-•:-t.••••17'••••::1,--•• ••,••••;?••••••. -' =• •-,•••••••••••••••••••4.--•••• • .1,':" •'''••'"•:•;•,••••-.:•‘• ;'••4,ft•,‘••••;-;-'•11'1'•:•••Wq.,1.1f;A••••;••••••4••••I.;"••••41f;:••••:••••••...:•:•••i:it-i••-•-4:1t.,,V.:;:•••• •;";•-,,;,...1,:;•1•V:e.:t1ti•:!2,11I:.:--f.... .:-••-:.:•.•1•.,•,';,•;,•':. .7,.;,....?,,t.:•••••.-. ••-•.•'1 4:. ,Xt:'-,TP..,,,`:: ,'!,...;:.t,-w414'16-..9/ciAE;;r,t,i,,,;(.-;:;,.::,,,,Alt•ti:?,N.:?;1 y:::•.1'..:,,,i,-;,,^0:.:". ..g-':f.'-'4-.'n.':tY:i'l.:•:!-.-!-....':',..k.;`•'. .•. .... ..::''.;...,f,-,-,2:1;,,,d,j2;;;•-2,:-..--.- :'•:,-,..,,,e-.:12-- ;.:V. I'4.70'?-:'-; .'1i•••`‘gl!'igaWn:?..i.:).- 6 `, 1(f-!:!;!.t'.*:., f-,..t. „.V3.i,;!:...,:::.•.•.:‘f,.:,.1,La..,2.- .,,a-,,,,..,2,,..,.._,_ .-— -ic.i'''''''::t4F-54'!-Fi.frV^7-14:g.C4:?'.,: ','Ar?Ai:,;',.rt''.:%';:,'";,'.:i''',;••; :).;,z7f2-:i!',•i,i9.2C7'.',..0.-. z; ..„,,.....L....._,„,..-.- -.1..:.'.;.kir:f.tP4i.?:Pii4;4'...V:"AgYV''LL,i..;.11-.'.,;.ilf....:,.11'i..A.:-.••-...4.,........,•4,, . 4.,.. ,...r. J.w...,...1: ‘,..n., . .. J,T.ki• j• .7)1[1::....)" ..• ' • . • .. .,, .,, •r,?,,,,,,,_,1 1 41 .. 6,-.,,, i,-..'"\i' C ••'Ctil . , , _.'.. .... :15";',.1,---..: , •.:\s‘ I.Al.:: ,,,,4.. ' %, .- I e ,. „,,, , 1,. ..,i ..,,„:,:11 - -,.„........:,'!p!,,,, - /--A,DiL....:..t;'",--_'11. '....;).1, -.1t.; k. • ":s:m,1 ,F4 2 ik, L e'•"° 4,., 'A ),,,,..,.;,,..?1, '."." i/1 :'..'• ' Aft2•77TIOX:-4,Thi.3:4*.tt '.•• .:. ''..!. : - • •' '''Z, 1 4 ..i.,..,. --‘44.,: \•sw: t o s.,kit fili,i,iirit. s--i....,,,::: ..: :: 1.•:._1. ,.,,...i.,,, ....,:, . • . ,...;., . /,', 0.;,..,. A. ..,.c+., .. .•.•,.-=-11-,7:4.7'r,Fqg:1' .2-•• • e •‘' •1-•;1:.,-\_ ';.,11,',c-- I ., •:.,.-4 •,q,',..:•.,..:.,.. . ,,, „ -• . •__Jr. .. 1.r. •''',''. • , ',,'.° S74/-1. ••/ • I.,' .•, 111....i.,•'.:-: ,-'-‘,,Z/7,..•:I' , • , . / ••,„ -... . -.1 , • -fe--- , ....(3:: .......,,, ,. .1,-,-.- • 1 .' - .... ••:,..! 01. LI. •,--7,I..1 :Lir. ,;:,...,.•• •• • ",...,,‘.... ..../.. 1 .1.,,,i.,.1, •,,, ,; .,,,... .., „i.:::: 1 , .., . . ...J.L ....;,: „„:„..,...., • .. 4.,,t,:ki• •17.31-.:,, i-'•'''',,...,:,..• 1........ ...i.i. ' ,,,,,,,, rf.,:.. - i.:.',f,. ,..t. -,... ',,-,. ...,4' .. : •• .•,.•,,,,.?_--,..' ..;,:;?,,'•,...!. ,,, . .--1,- ty.:::::„.„..r, '.,,, . ...... ,...j. ...:, . . ..,.:-..,•,,,...il . r1;.17?:tr.ti. .'4'...7EI/KA.1: . .1J ,..•Lt • \1 ':\a • =,..,..‘ , • IKQC13:'.y.', ...,V1,11 '.• 'f-- -.....•:. •-tu..-4--;:,.1,•., •,:.‘,.._.1-,..i.r J,..... .. k,. . . , ,. i/j,-„riti.,..:i•,,i ,...IL ..2 T..,7:.-T.-?,-.!.-c4 pPV.cvt•t.)f:4‘r,,1--;T!..V.•..,-l..:•i'C..::.-ei-r.,f1,.9•,,...•-„',,':-.r,•.•,,:.4•,':;:-.-.:2'-.,.,'',,.1.'.!'-,...;,• ,,'•y....••,•.13.."...-,,-.-.•.;,I.N,,„,•.'.•,;.•''.,.'2k,.:=.1..,.-.....)•l:'_.i4'._.-,-,.,,I,..;;.'..t.,7e-.7..t'.a.•r.--..::•4 1._':-1:1..4.i-e..$\34.:-,,,...',i4\:;-.t,.414_..I...4.\;:.,.,C,4...\,.;...)..\% .71.i.'..:..'„i..;1,...';'.-,.;._'-'i-'-i.t:-.-•,- .,..:..-,.,.',.,!„,1•)....';,(:..•..1,...,..•;.'•..,..'.,.?„i-.'.,•....1P..lJ..i7-7. ..,.,.t,.-,r.r/„:=/:,•)1'..,V12:.„i'..l,v .1 :i ..pH,1•.%I-.,'.H.2f..t.',...j!:•..•...i..1.....570%!''i'1.':'.,'-..1,1,%i/„;,':'.•iY/p,,'.:o;!fi.'..'',1.,1'11r.,.-5-.'..H.i,.-3:•0l-e...:'..-1:.pL-t,4,:.4-•)i.ti!',•1.,,.I•.,1.I•-..:-.-,-.la1,1.„-1:",.';,.,-,..",.i't•••,--7..i-.„1-.,-b.i•-),.-:.;..•..1}s-.S.•:1.1-:„-•--:.1":N.•,,(-.•1=-,--.,;1f1:',•4'„••1-,.V7,,•.•,••,',:-,.,1,•I,1;'.',.:;;p,..V.•'..",;jg1-•..,.f-1;1.,,,.,•!.,,',.!• 0P,..i,•/i,.1t,./'./;•1.,,.,"0Z:'..':.(".'.'.:.4:::,...'•.?;s•'•-•?)i..g.,.7 i,-tg..--.•"••,=-'•",i1:••--I•,1'.1N L•'• / pIi „ ,a .,I-,„.%...1...„..I',I.•,,.,'''-..,''•....:1-'.'....,•.:1.,"...,.t;1•.:'4-si..0,;i-..•.•,c.;,.:i1.',,.,:-1,,••','•z--',..•'I;A c.••r f1•i 1,t.N0i1••W•t.,--,•4,:',4•-,•.-:,.4.*Y•,.-t•4..,"..-.,'4.7w,.t•i',,•".;•'•'„.i 1i_--",tS';._,•-•,.--•.‘,:;_:.•:,:r.'..„:..1,..7:,„:.,.-1',;=.‘.:•..,,,-.r..,-,•.,.,:,.-,.,N4,t-1•,•.,-••'.•,1.57.,,',,.:-;,*-`,•...•-:.-,;,.s,•...:':‘.1,=..:,,.:7.'i..A.•''•".1;.1•..''•-,,-•-,.•,,.•,7,:-4,ii-0••-••rl,•,i7'l.,'•‘•':...-.:s....•.,..,.t,'`-.i.t.I,",.,-.,.•''ff:-•.'f,.-.,,.-',.•'-•,.1s-',..'.:.'.._'•1•:..y.<.....••'4'.,:.,.4I.,',%ii'1!,•..',•:'.••'.,.,:',,'.....1'A,.s":'.1-..,"....•..y.-..\.•''':•7,.'',.":,:.'K,,1:.'•l3.,.,..-, .,--,_--1-.4,Z,'Nc 1,,%.,.,c•t,.'r',,,.)-A,•',•i,1 y.•,fr r,....e.:1•4:5I,').7•.7;.,t;.i.•y•,:h':-.•':: ,••y•)' •V•'• ,.... :.':.i.•.' i .," . ..., .,,,„,r If iiIar..,,..A 2:'-.,..1-fr'''..,•-•.• ,..--,:•••,'.1:1-ill •;41'.., .::..•.;.•-.: • 1416 . i V ,W,,_",.;,-'At, -4,.4••• . 3.'‘,..,•k. *,-"P'•• ., 41'1 -7...7,0.C!)-;11...!,!.:,.—.ii erv. •••; i'.41:t.',../ • t•.-,c.;...„..I. •.•,4. ,, :ir.. (.' ..:10,,,,..X'a,.'*0.,,-.h,,,V' ''''''S..';,,''.:;`,/.%')1.4fP ', 11.i7;;II ...17!%Tk.,94•:-•• - 7,/):'4,::::.. / 111,•':;-;•" 4...`17:".:•1 me , ,,i,,,,,i ..—WI ..:;i ,.. ; ,. .,..I mt., .,..‘.'711.,,,,.,714;;:g4;4..,,,,,*:1,0:: ,...,1:00,,,,,,. (K.ilkili 4.0'.:•":f I -f. •'-•-e.2.4.,4-:-.I (s1-,%.!•'. ''.7 Am, .Mh J66. •'1'y4.','" /1.0-::A-.14--,,,. .,9..... /It 1 'II,.•:-.' -.540:1.:;';PM,,,,4,,,...:::'As"). -----•,'44',... ..\,-:&:,.,...," •,_•-41,,.ii i, •.' ,11.1..i.,,.• - ••••• • ,^ te-dy..."i...•A ..c..N.'-.../T.11„.'4.'..1-,j:,. •.VQ:-. III&Mli •1 ,,,,' tP,S7,01k• .•;'.. , ,1,%.0.,,I4...,.N.' : ",,'..Z.,5%,.34,c 'f.'4.....,• ii. -I:4,I . ••(••.•,7 Xv.,-4:::•,i-,;-•....F,z•::',...,:: 1-, ro, 144. •,'' , ,„ ..„,.,IC ),;,. . .. ,,,..wi,oi).,./..-,.....7.,.. .!,).,....110.,•)1:-.;,:7..r. ..-. s..;.:-..:,',.-i':`.7.,..,.;,-;;;C;t4„,11110 \ ' \is..'5--., .s'.? '---• ,,;11.1 \,;..,...i.:,...,,* ...--,,i4.....- • i\ lapm"'" .6/.1-.> ,./. --. , -,i ,..--1...., ..,,,.... -...,,, ,.. ,-,., .. ....... v,..... •....,... .,,,, ,_,_,,. 4, ;.,.....2,..,ili,.-_,-. - :..i j-ci • . .,".„ .7-.);}-.4-, ,,,316‘..,,,I,..:••It iti,,.0-:-::: -:......-.:•. Ns. \•,. .4„:•.•,,,,,iiiito;.„_."..„...•. ..,.,_. .,!;-.., ti•0,_,•,_,,:,.)..,11,4 j's ,,,, tl, 1.1,:=, )'i'. ')., '\. ;•.,- ...4:7'1.:-.---1'• .1.1:5i,-)7:\...2: "•:.'.'::;*'.7f:J1:".6:::.-1-_-.04'..r...-:'1: ..:::44,Xi:S. ,41.Al".• Y.:':,- ..:v,,,i1,•-''',..,. •:,..''..,' ) .4.., -' ..s.::i.-2-.: -1...-•:„:'";',-,.:-2,-t',... \.',.;,1 ., , , ,......r. -y.).•,4*= • i, •\-. ^..-lt '''''''41:6.,,,,,--;4_,,..... //1.7,-;;;;' • ,.:,;(•,.!•:.-i•4'.-;='N'- .•\\:'\!..i '>,...-.4,,,--\ ,_.., 1,....,..:,,,....„.„,...,,,:„..„,_.t...,w. ' i•A': ;;(1,,,,,,-,."'..,..,' .\':...;,,,.,.„,;:.::•,::: ;:::;, South Po.,‘;F.1,-•"• ' •.?ti-,rt•.•:-.'" •' '434111>'':•. •\17-..,.. I. :k.,.;, ,...--,.,j...,--- s.:;.! ..-..s.,,--:,.:-..,.,::::. --,--:.-e. k, 1. 1.,..,,...Ivi.;-;,,..,.:-....,,,,,----;•.,,-;at::!.--x ...\ . ., .._, ....,..:i., c.,,,,,„.__,-„,„.:,,,f,,,„. .. ._,,,,,,. .:27.., _,,,,,,,,,L,,,,.._.,, ....-::...., • ,..,, ,,,.5„,r-..,,,,,,t• •,..., t;.5,A..:., 11)-.r.43.--..,,,,,!'f'•-,r(M;;;•.,%-... r ' ' ,-..,'..1•:,•'''".."'-----•'-e,-9.•..,-70in 1.--.. .' :......,--,, ,,„•".'•-,,-.:•.-.=,- ...-.-' ,:- '\,',p'r-.;...'----1;••=--1 ••":„.,„. • • i. '.' I.: 'At: :'.. - .!--,,,,-7, ,... •-.• -...4..•:...a.,.-...--;r4c.V------,'--- - D..--,•-•-•'.f.. ,..,.,L. -:.''-±..,-,,,,.-...,„:14'..=P-,,.'-': -,?--.••'''• .•,'.,.•3'.... - ! Ol, •:11+;e'...... 1' -.• ' ''t• -s. -::-''' ci-.• --•'-"'' 4--4,,,-• •••;,:,„-- ••••;',,.,4!6,.._.,.. .',..1,.,;••k,•,•;'‘,.•iilk.•'!'I. ; "Ir;,,I1;OA,, , Co,onsm Faln4 .„. ir-7--•.! • .-.: 5.1.'•'4•,".ig.S!',!.."..!: t. •---qZ,.i•;•• ..:ti i.:,.....?„- ,---' --,- g ''',..,L,L,.....1;.1...,.,:'',..'"-..„..,...".:(11::::..,\W";: '...;..:.N--.-',..-:'.1, :4,'.$...:1:•-•\.;.1-.:.''It 31':,eg,r... ;;A,r''‘‘;':', \st it. ) -).c• .7. .N.4,1;-av.,".,).-...-:::-'7. ' -; '..:...: if,.' ' I .'-;•-• ..:... ..s••,:..... .,:i......,...I'*'...A.!_,,\\''`i...i..'. ';.!'.,...), •'. • t'___\AN-j! _ . V"'.i;.•7':‘,Tl'..f •‘ ' `..'• •":1,. .'le,' ',.', •z./.:-,...,•-fir.•. ••,,,, ‘• ,•••,-...11,,,,tilitrimi a ...i.:a •;‘., ,..,,, , ,• ,.•:‘,.....,....7, •!:,..,x, - , k •''..':-Isir:,:2;0?iff(.: ....=:,:';',t.!.4; , •-•.-„' o .i. =,-.--y elr., ,, , :N),T,..., .. ,p-41.-_,..:w...c •i ‘:',•,.\z..1..0,-.e.”, _41'. .....,,,,..1•...,...!..' 1:. i,..,....- .P.,,,..:,,N; ' 1,0 •''..):'•• • 1 •'.2% r''''''' T .,i 3 ,l'i'. : \::. • I.I.• • "t. )1' 5'11'..- Z.....0.k.P`t: -I .e. s.:,..i,•'''.r. ..:.7...•, , ' - .•k."..',..n, • '' r.II,:.-',41.1,,,,,,,,I1 .' 7: '%;.;' 'I-N.%.-.1k.,.4,. .•....•- . k..."‘t° :... OW I' ....;!.•<...*iii.,\1].. ' is" ..,,,.•,,,.: t. :.,, .pL... ,... .• ,.. , • •i• ,h.,_....-.:,.,,..,„. ... - .•II!.-.-, •-;.•17,1-....-, ,t-i, -,! -. ..•`:.r,... .••')'•'‹..!:-.•:.. •••''•••••. 'tot O..,:'IT, .-1,...t 'I. 4.''N .?_!.,, rAiiki dr'I ...;21-• -h'': ---' •• ..- ) ....,-.-. '••,--. -. ..'7,i''i,‘::\ ,..,.k.,4.4, !'N'r...,.,_:• At14.11,,r..&:k",; :i•::_:',•,:.„. ., i ••-..... 4., fl,I.•,"i I. j, \•,:,..,t, -,••. :.s'.-I.-,1 ..-:,,.',.:-:;;•NU', 1...--.11:.•:, •• -• .• •• \.- - „.....,..... ...... ::'•\!)%_-:,'.,...2.‘..,'*(ii..."411,. ..,..II. Nye ..,.... . -r• •.: -,/-•-- .1 V.,\K• •• .. X.-Nk.'‘A La.;':.: is-L ''. '''..';:.10 M L'il Mt4r....•'''11:4 '17•4•=-1----) Y.:"--. : ,,--E-4-7::,0-4 . • :-.':'., ,1,1.f..:::;..,,,,..':':.„---:':::..,..:,('-.,;4•? .....k._.-07ripV.,;,..„. •--. ..,',..g..,'•=-...,•,•••,..!p.^'1.r 4:.'..'''',.\-1.4;V:'''s. ,,,P;:a ;',,15•:,•:...7i... .. ::4117....f,.: j.l!bls.4.....a•(,...,..:5-t ...,N,: .-;,.*.,..,, •,,....._,••...., . T.,„,,,..., .,,I,i I.7.?",.., ..‘-.... ',.:1.‘,N,• V',...' at',. ^4.!•"'S.:.I",•4,.. - C:...,-..,......-, r . '.-:.'T ..4::?*---7;3-.' ''..t.4'1.)... . -it'L '4".:=F'''',":.K.I%)„..h.,,;,..,„..4,4,-.D-=,.: !..„, , ,,..-xt,..--...„- ,...,,,,...,,, ••..=.,: -.,„,..:,.. , : 1 work .,,. ..: .....:, . ..... • . .. .-,,,,,,.._-_-_,,,.:„..,„,,,, ,,,,„ .,...,..•.2,, ,.,,.••.- ,, ., aNz. ....". ,... -..7:•• -LL:,... .. ,, '..:, :,7:v"..,,P'"kZeit .': 'k(f4t ....'i' l,:''''.''... ....:•'-.5'-•.ka411.;1';. ,,LI!-••71-.7'..:.:j'--,,!,1 ,PcIk't.,,:-V.i.:,\!..-''A.--"-•• ''''. i•-.‘1.'',i,'..'''ri.20 '.".• .1 t I'MM."' '-•.I- 1-' . • ..-.,-, 1'.:77"''''--"''- ".-•'..1 \\We'f.-;.':'.11:1`i. ', -'.C;JJ,Ii74--;.if''.:.''f'''!. ";\;„. ii,,,;,-L.L • '1:11 P\'`.1':';jPtil:.:.'..,•!1 j •:%.'t!1".;=•,...liS,:tia.!.,"..i-;'ifillir ,.• 1 .,,. 11„ • :,.. . ..- t . ‘6, -- .,„„L_L____,:','47;,!i.5.: 1,!.....;,'.....,'=k-46-",k,,,lf...,,,'..',..: ..., .; '''- i:'4-i'....:?.4,1.;':',,,.u..:„-‘;: ',,,Z st,',..:'1,1,11:;14,•'%?4.4411°- -**11.''......:1."0/47141.2A1.".: Ihr Fl.;:'•IM '•\...• •••••:.'--i.V..T.,-..!,1-',..,,-L1:-...7,.,,4'•:,K"A..-.l.t-y,...t-:..-1-"'io:j•--i...-,.•*r:.,..--,...•)••;•,,•r,;,,''1.---,,'.,;S..'•-4•7L-'•'=v:*,,'7:,:-:..,..‘..:A ir',t•-i:..;.11..4 i;.i.l..it-.,:i:.k..;•,.:•1 i -.i::'.1fi.;-:-'•If2•;9•.',•,•„2c:.:*,l-I'••••j•#.r,..-..'--'..•.'\.%.•kN\.-."•...'.-,‘•,•••'•„•''(,•1,41•_N',...':.:„.:-,1.1/•1:.,Z,T",-1./v•i0,-1,t:N.,,,:.'2h4..4.,:-,.i'4.;•-)-'•,-•,.i,•.,•i.1.A,i ti.'i,•°2.vr•...1....,.,:1;'.p:.,'•,.),.'„:..,.,,.,..„-...,,i-...:,•.4,:,'.-•,:,r,•.4,:•'.•'"..:^..,.:....,,•„.;...,,.'1.-.1•`2_-,."•y.':•.."',r„"•,-,'..,..,-,,c,,,..\:...,:„,.-i1•..••.i!•,.;',1(.,-".2,;I;1..,:,,„.,.0r7:.,-?,,11Irw.;:.,,i:.....,.4:..41-'•.':-....,••..•j.:A..r,::.....•..,•:4,'.1:,S,:::_i:..,.;_,I!i..,..p.a.'.'.I.I.,..,=.•.-F'-'-•=- ...1d`4, 9A I‘,I'.,•r.r1,4:'„ 1. 0.1.14..P,4IS1•,d"•IrPNi/.i,.-..;-.•0o>iw4 r,p't,1 1'.4.'\.•1..1.:./4\L-2:i I..,.:;:,..;,.V..r.a 6;,-`.'.-.‘.*.L..,'::,4.,m1..,q,.*-,.:i.,...:",2::•,,-,!.,)/:•,;,6',;T-g"I,,-A.'•.-V.i•...t.-:'.1\'•',...:..;.,'---2::,'.1.r3.7i.::''1 i'1'.,i.:•\1•.-1.?'i',.''„•,t•:,1,1.,:_....,..`..1„..Q.:•,'.•.'.•':..,;-.f•7...•.„,,.,.'1..rI..t1....!.....,':::..•._.1......7:...•.•..,:..., .:.. r., ..a.r...i--. ... i - lV- 7 ' T 's• '• . . ' P.,_,17••••:..,,',...-`•- •.'•-.:-,- - ••.•:..:• ../:,•.1.•,:',1'. • ,--_;; .-.-. .•-.-:Ft../ -3111/0, ..1,,,,F. L. 4,..4.;:..,,,,, ,•,, . •-..... •A,• ••••-. ----, • • -- _::1..,:•.1 ...t?''',4,4i1.4j.;''.,:.• •••'W, 1;;"(..(LT,,lft , .,n__,,-,-•------....„.:;:-..".•1•:i.r.7."',. ."...4.N;;."..,,egialagli '1%,.0...;4-....?-:'-'1,fe:3\'Ir. . .•'ik-4\,.:'.Itiii'''.''..:',;i:•• . '''.° - 1- i . .. Vik-la.1,,t!.! •'•it&i:4,:': .11: ....I • .,'"..'''''-ki-.;i,'.*;;Jp.i---,.)...?•-•-•-:----:-L------ 4::.,,.':-!-!'i‘,.-P,-...':-Alirozg• -...0,,,. .•.‘",?.'; L,:f:'--.4.ir.,--;'-'‘'f..-4.;,..A,T,...--+....-,-,_-,-!...,;,, ......j.,175,-• .,y.. , -.V:'1,1,'.,y. fin-1 :'.'' , .--, '-.. • •4;:•-- \'''',.-1-;.i-i..7•'•;':",-:i-i.t.',:.7::if.V v‘,.....,.- epoilt ig-., •.',..,•;,..,--AY.,.;,:. ..,„gi:•,,...:,-.7.....,-;,-.zk.'1§•:-.1iiwx•Aavilri-: --1--•• '•• -2'.\--. t '' -,..,,?2,,.....4m,-,,,• ,..,--,...-,,,„,.. ••:of,,,, '1•,.. .A.,-._.;.,.•.,v•a",:.:,,,--.- .--...-:- ,,z4,...,...7,--- ';,;-'',' ',vitt p,it'ii..'4,•%:,-.''''41.4.1,74 ;„,,r.':;-.=:---;'•'xa•-`'4--p.."-erft-".'':---ii-Noel • '-' ....- .. - -••.: .•:,-,. .-,4,--,.,,..4.•.1.. ....,li i'; ,-;,-,'.:•.:--, ',1-..',-...-----•,-.• --- ,.-..-i,i...,,,.......-ri..,,•,,iv• -...it ,.., • .t-:..,.;. ..-•:?,•;,...., ,,;...:-.,:,i,:y4.__:.,,p:,',...f. 4,,..pi.. ..-:,,•, ;/.:!•:•,,•1• -,- _•_, -', .'.: .. ;•• •,•,•," Al'. '2..",.....ff''.. .. •: , -.:,',.'y,,,-.t22,.//' 7.-0' '`'' ..",...q'''.2,-- . 7- . II 0 a-rt., vr'ir4/0 rf4r,. ......,,4,..",',,,„„..... ../.,:.-..•.,. .„." .c4,------„,..:--„, ..,•:•,--••-•..'.7•. •- A.1:-.7,"•..•:,••••,.'...••I,.......•".,• ..k.•.:.1‘t'' .,. ;Ls4:(,;„,',P,',•.4 .1•••-..-,,:•• s.....!•-••-. N\ i a ',-.Y.QA:-.7t v...i.,•;',,,..);n.'• •••1; t......,:--,'''.•',''', ivi:-•Ni,)...• •-•••'''•-•,•=';.•*,..- --7t;.• ..g-i)(.----.:-.t:',1••••-/IT. - f,••;,,i...,,• '',..,,•,,.. ),,-,1...,x.f•i -.... ..., ,..,,,---....)I• ,...,, - ,k• -,, ;: .,.,.,,,;.) ,•-• , ,-..!..Y,W4 ••• ''''.;/./ ' -''''l'-4 '.i'•-• '.'"---.••••••..;•..L". ,•. .,;•:, i iiii•.r„._,:.,t4,b, . I•J .,:i .Z....Atc..44,...0.,,,,,ki..:.1,,,.., .,.J.,,,,,,..„orjmi1,f,,..,.:::::-......::_,)--',.,: ....,..:'..,•,...:,„::.,.. . . , . .7!4,...,1 :........,,,,, „ '-''-4.---,_,:._jr‘ .1-L.....ii):.'`,.. '.• i.' ' ''',1'KM-.• ••• "..'' :- V-•;••••-• .1`. .:'• :1c0,-::.•:::-,."'•--% g or,- fil--4 (., ;I'n,`1••-••,-,,••-• - -sw , -m,:.•••.Q.,,ITt.-,:• .:,:..,-...!..,..-,-•:::.'• , r.5.-,...,_.:..L.,_-., -,",,r, . -- •-...: -1.1:1,2.1.5,.-.:;:,:,,',014'5,,,L...,.,•-' " '' '• )",.I =''',.' 1 .‘“); , fit, t'". .'s -. .'. -2' '- -2.''.122"r-2.'i(.rN.,','-- • .--,.....;LIt _,,----• _._.--t--. ..4 '7 i-..":•! '„ P'- ;'.... ,;, --•'7 71 . _tsfi. .•=r-7.0.\• 'Mr '‘.; .l'!621.4' .•1:440111W- ,, !•'2 '''.. '.4., ''''--''''..):'• •",,, •IN, '- -.,;-,• ,'....!-,.-,1:v ..:.5; --%, ..., 'f--7 gAt. Noe. ...... . -! 'pr.- ..-1---, ...1, .-:. ,.., ....1.5 ,. . 11., t4;•-, ...a....,, A ..„..,... •:..,- .,,:4 . =4\4,.ifk. ,. ;,.II!!!.•,, .;----,, 4,..,...'..-..,;,, ..,)• _.........., .•...%. 4..;',•'.74-&'•-•'..‘t.4-'....;.':.,..., I ''.•.411711.1=m 1A11/4 -..:41;:l.z. ‘..,7-4-.,'"'.-'••• . . .. ,r, •••-..4,........1[ 11111`...--V,..t,I. , ).9.,";,1'''..' .7-, ,. • - ! 1.P!Ill ,..,.''...lilt, ...• '.i,i e. .‘5 - • - "191• g ,r."..,- .,.._- roe. ra ' 'k. ..1?"".11681t. -•t•:.•*, T.• C. • • r >, ,•-‹ "7 '- • ': -i" r . :- ....,r,..1-,-Z d' ..: i . ../i .. ; .e,,,L,4 -. • :2.,,.-.. . ... _,;,.).1. , • • - • I 11. 1...1.c 0 ' ' ' " -..._ .,... : 1 I le,',1( • A•‘,;-..•..k I E:. .int i g..* . I, 44'•4 I , I . I-- - .r3C1 c'...., •••.-k,..-.-, ••' e- .':'1'..-•:::•• .••/7"-r-i: :si,•1. `?..4.--7^ -1• •.. .*/.••;,,, 25 ... ' t • ' 1:4....'SO I -:ri-. ‘t.;.ii .;.. il g i: ....11, , .,-,,. • . , . .,.,,,rionj, • .1,/„-:,,:..,...:fr.,,,,..._4-i,..--; .,•,i•1.•••-.1-,--i•j% li,1,,,iil V ) : , • ' • . ..•,-,.. .•/ '..1.,i• g II /)I ,I , .t..r 1'W....''. 7/:.''' ciff ..;'• I'ci• i.,1 j .1 I P ---N..r, ,,--'j ' . - i j,.:.,,v• sir..4 .;*1-..;•,-,z1,--&6• )::. ..) .• i .,'',' . . ,• ,..:•:•,:...N 12.30” '\A'1;4N•f .1;1-•-Ard:•:-...',Olic.e2511 I / I / ..1 t %_t,IV' .-...c • ue had additional min- ecent map was filed with C aL . i . , ,. 1 O 1 ftt.ific' ,.e. 7ard h Duwamish 21, 4 i113....,. partment of Natural Re- :veiopment that occurs Ar ,,,.,_ , .,.., as should be preceded to confirm or deny the eidi.,- ir ,,.... • 'al subsurface tunnels. , • V.STr7:1:7471",'..ifc:7",r•II,. ..:.:..,.).„. ' - , .,s4-,,, ., . U„.. ..-- rt . ..,,Irliii,..,),A ti•,,-.1 'rS Y.. l' li* i(<' tt St (�I `'i f'�' 'k %yr'� =C p �;1^; ':L;,S' r.':•- I•t••!'•�`1r`�l.'/,P",: _.l.',`_I — '•1,`, -, ., - h'2 •-.';;''� • ... 1 y.:; .},L;�+ ; :.z ,�: r \ ' j ram. �_. V{{� C _ -(I'j li t„"".-, 1.0 : \ • V .i�; + I w 1V-a �� ': :: s 1 L'a <S:+•,;•:.-,:il'� , .y••, .0 - �%'1. 11,,I_ -,, !',•t �i I, Iy `(, t..S ,t;i •cJ.i' �..,, I )I-J:;> .;'l • l'i1•.1 • :L@ I,w• ..3-, , ;.•.;j7,1 i/a!•+).i''.- r,-Z.'',, .. � ,.jy+.. .'1 i _f.-I.�i-..:1�,;0.v',1`;.r J, 1 ;. ,,,, . • f..- AN • y �',a �{{., r}f.'''I ;s �' i..,' ti: ii' / 11i `1' a.1, ' 'sr 1,' ��]]]..',,,��,':r..5 •3:17-..#..L1., 't , ",;-j,',. �:�C,'it ,,:,�- ;'�,1.' f, ,1., [C J,1 :..r�?• '' .,,-k - '•' A fril" kip, ` 1r IJ„ J'� � ,, �; .� 1�,r`- -1 ,r•,. ,1.� a 1 r u � �� -��ut a ,}, �r,, r• " � ___.L. '' I• .-•' � I I!' I ..t._.�:�.:.:• �� .r�a� i ��•j�' t�.ml�,+ -` - • Gt`1,- `' ., J,,T,,-, Li h. .:il1 ,'1,a/ .';{`.: \! ,Irl�:� I) ir��, `.. -� • .` 1 " r'`._ 14- E ,' [KiBel ��:1 1 a -i I n _ „_.^' ," 7T� -•- -i,r ' .. =.-1' _ -t I-C-.` ,7 gil" , i:y :7 : .:r,' 11 11 l c` "` 1 L,; PI -•;�''.i„5.�-Ia:�%ilt !,-.;44'M.i„/r.. l..i rC.1 x _ .. � • •I ,1 1;1 1.1:i • '4 -....• 1•. • ;L. gib:: ..1 ?� —'.- - -i,,I.}' , --:'. .� I � il. : t; �$5.,: t' L_"I II a r. _. .- r._ 1,.. .S`j • : ,'r' :� :\A a,,, 1^. '�,... - � '- i:a' `,; e ii: - Y it `,,- 'Aid ` Y`-ti} • �7i 1::„F i,,�61 wr��=...''� - -:-�--�:G,.r- :'ems I .J. ,� 1 -4;.FP� " 'c l f 5• ;). / r:ai'.;9.: ,a.-., t 'i'i' .I.':1„'1' '�: I i;1` ._� 7 . 1'j1(s f• )+. iY %-h' .vc�,-i-�`". ,.,•,t, uE.r'7;;;`.�t .{tll. '�' ��.41 ,',, ., 1 r., , . 4 ;. -� Ire•i l^,:,(..; .�:� i. ,,, 5.�; .�tp• ,.; \Cal,- '� -./,��EN•`t',�!: ,,j ..i: .�� '1.:`�•:` .• /:! i' lk,�;e>::_• ' `; • -,` '•: \._,Y.1•1 1" li{y'�.•l^:ii,T3.i.fi c"r • V ' f;"'J .; aa ,r .f' "1-\;'•\^1 •.•,e••'•j •,. .....N"�_ �'I jii"' ".:'�i�,3.'s• ..:�• �i -.,,.e..�I „VIM'. {{ :5..: _ `�,•��7>I 'i a` '� _ 1!Ii ..1�:'- ?-_•'.i4_)„ Ic �i. ,r.`Yil�9� 1+�;r� ,:,';�tlt .f!+- � j'!'1 � ._�_._ .,� is '1 + r we"fit.' F..:,n;J:A.:., tt :\,j, GJ /.. I; ' �:-- .'-)ev S,I, � - •� ,'y ., 3JTSON. �..i'L C 1t' {" ,-a: '! '_;•II"?.. •'e\\1�7 %':/.'.v�J.. I!jl+, l:i,(rj, 1t•,; G: .,..: r.:'•. r41f.�.r r\l^ ;S �.1�� s\n =� ' ,IJ��r'i-.'t'l� . ,••',10;,.:L.�� i.l,.�" `� •� HatY�"T:`_•, _ .+:. � ',i.?"•z �. .1*} 1�ti�i:l�'-:•�'.,'.� '-, \: :lp: i'i S.. J, i 1 -_ _ - ..„; ryr,-_ ir.-_,J.-:. , • IV , :,- 111 11I1.:, ',_ ' +4. I:••z }f., C• \, 41,. ,1.., '�._w- :.:a 'f.,li_r'+- .. ,'.. "I"`4t'`.''. ,`.�:;: 1 i�} ?421 � >:i ,f,.Y '(I 1 Ir \r,• _C i 4',, 1,' :l. i �,. �?=:. -. 1 rlfi•T- Y'_ ,rFF't_.,C,+tt _n:.� - 7 7 -l:` S �n,. 5 fif- 1 11-f' .y(.t'S� ,!;•-,. :i.,t, ''i(:; <r lgk)p-1 1 1 II' '.\�.�;I'i• \�?s";`.,F"?'" r,1 • '� i' L. i'' _ _ - )..i;.•$ t 1n `.'1.�':,`' i'ti S '1 y�'^9.`�--l-.r` •.u4 •G :" S�: °.�- ., .� fi °'' `� ,�1•:•:j': i '. ,�1'+.i ''., r.,•:,, a:rnr • 5. :tr: 'fi ,'a:. \:: r,S ' ''K.�?�S. lip I_ ',�� rr q,,'.'.ot• Y '4 c( �..:-� a: .�i:: •.� k,:.� •. ;.L'.i:':�;;;4 1( li•'35,1'i.•:y...J '_!} ;h 1,; iN, `�o .;t' (ram~} %• 1 ''.\�.�''-'S, r,§ .�,, �:1?;r. .Ss'n,, a•` ii.'r::. �'iI �yY3;:�. 1'.91'ti:l'T~ •�r pi ,f ;�. �ti 'ii / • :� } • t'� .i: i „ �... is T{....._::: -- .. .;;:r.'��:: i1%-` �'�'^ +�-7.-:;••%, �.:�, :is �: �'tl'c t. rt��W ��..r'::-�':`7-•� --,°,Pn,Oun.ag-a+'r,"":::� .�"7'�/$,1'�•«+.�' ,� "'•':=`�e,:�; '.:r.,�.... ' / %•797✓ �+ Tire ( 'j "� �1 � _`..!L�:F`'.4;�F.�y �k:.'.�,� tfj.»:1!'�!:� ,��'.' i` :/�Jj a'r �r�/ .�- �f; \. k1' ,,-,_:- "1., -�';j:,.cq 't'._'E 1' .T',:�'6, ,LA '•172. ;+. '•.I':3. `� .'t,�! ',.• n L .',..,.•• _•__..•`""r u� n 1 w :., SS .. i-I. ,• f' ( tali. i,.„ _I',: ;T..:.,. ��`r:.:,i..`'„',- ,..:' - .,Ifi ? +1,.:':.• 1 Friars -1 `+• .:• e. :';�e�;'ili:'t---,c J}}� fig, �'': 1 . t,:%,'•:%'_'fi Lj;\ �� -1• '�°:; • -�'Ici IJ4 s1 ,;i1• I; (2 )" •_-• .I t"'-:. 'S.--''z �," .'.r4:1,4'••- 44'4 .1...\ - 1 • • 1 .c may„ t��:',''. '� '.t• "+' •1'��=�-SE.!, ,f-' :;eI 1 I'1,:::_!��,;,I'1, 'q -+�, 1 !: %; ") 4�• .-#„'F;� ...$):::,? -'y `10;: -2 ,. ,_1 .i--Pi ..I',W', i.I' ':t"_-I` ';'' `IQI'r '` : tt "t:,.•'�- YI • I L! 1 • t� 'E; ?:,fir,,• ``t,' • \, r 1 t. F- , !•1�' --'j' 1' ', ims.,'pli -Ik. p I' -*...L--2. : ':.-- -t''I�. 1 \L, C'.�.w� �';a✓`F�`°`ti. 1'",�°'""'.`.." c:n::,'u l:�.,r'.;y,. .I:.rF.,�, r. \. gr..r..z,� y „t,; \ +�T �I•�` L I' � i . 9' •;i[:�� ,.:.. ..,- a%5'„�.,.� _ 'J''1 11 i1- �` �: •S:� .. k��:L"�� 1(L ,�} . .,,�:� 1,, ,G- �`:� '-t,'',I Zy_ s.1. ;;�',k;z.,;-._. 1 L is�:.,. _•-:I_:____I, '•••• -..i:. „,,,,-,.•••-.',:::,--•••• :•••• INN , ..0i.,-s- .1.4Tr:,• ,-.I::•='..,:" :,...:-... .•.. ,-',..,. --.L.,,,::r,, ,,.-;;,.,',-.1,......,„;,, li upir v•.,.',',.•:-.7,,'z. °: Nil), -. ...- • - .. \ s.'. 1,- -4-1-4':,...1.'.1.1.::1.: • .�::' y.:Jr'�i. '�ti\. ' , ..` 'y:a 1r,/._. ".r_ __ +:.r .'!'C'S:�I-t hi12' -_!J!! �;y.- +'nir.`'• ,'-=-i, I` \'-` .., 'i4' .y�,y + ['(yf�":.,` / 11+,' ' ..:`IFS.'. .,,:I. 'r."! .rr.`:» L:F4, L3E ..�: •. .,19".. "5'=r0. 1<-+.. „};•. dn..'i':. 1+ ... :➢f`F}�� 1 It �:�•tr liL:n. '.i • .'Ij1- L: _. ,4 'ns, cf7 Frr t;- ,:' a,.C. :1. ! - .}4. j;,;,� iNI ..1",` "'' .: •'‘'‘}:'\!::Airlit,.•:......:1-‘•?'''';'::-.!.'''''.:.3t:•-.1;til-t-,j-'::5t\1:11:.. ..i.. l•':l'; 1 '."'")..';'''''... .;4'-'--4:t.i),,;t?!.;75....;:.:::4\\'34:'-':?s'ilf:Iii;kr; 1. k. IT =F' .,'h; v�....cL.,,a:n= . . °ti;,,L;.�Y:.:�\::i�.' -;�.r� `1.. Y-- ▪ :,-:^ `"•TI�•1.4 ,'3 }L�F •6`. ,,Ryr s,�". l .;.,,(, ?'r�.r.'\-�, 'a•`1 i� y,•. l 'I" _ :',-, , ..:1:': g. _ - i. 1'i t.-ram.'' L.,....-1 L 1, ;.:'/ •`.� .,Y :!- • .'�v,,.�". , ; ,.f: ::I. .:t< 1 ,,,..A, 1 '.l: _) ..Jl •. % Y.: -aI�✓;�;{�''�-�Y. • - •:u4.. ` ,'`.. . • .� ▪ i--�• .h-,:. ..ors ...k • •, :;%- °� =�_ i s 'A !24`i;'�' ,�1� 1 '.:4: . \. 'I`�t'>,•`•�T, •+-a.�' =C"' '�`I+�". _�,;r... 1 �J19.$;/�r1�� I: �, 1 ,,i • \. 'J-• I � 'vV . �'' -'W.i.i -C.= ::T'\t '"' ,.�':r,,..;'..--7'"' 1 j 11� ;• y111 .':.,r r i1'±'- ,-.'; ,-, ,rl" :f y o, �1 i� _ ,''1 11 • .\'� d. ak • `., r.1 1'y J > 1 r `' -•,. 11�f11 ., - • i Y. ' .i,r , I -.j'. ,1sio f is 1,Lel {. Orr �\ • r 1 ,` 1 , 'i '�I, ) A �..'•1 :. .. T 1 "/:'I/ 1'ta 1 ,,i Y,,— _.1 . - AJ 'I. IT _ I, l z1 4{ 1 .v.rl • I— is:..i -:r:I ::,.1'.f a Pl4,° RfRf.(f, ' I . 1`'i...* 'l - - ,.\ �,. �, . • 'I oodolalns extend be- *��,¢� �? 4, ' r, k~ � i xt Class 9 )611 1c�YT11Sl n maps. Flood In- 5 8'• .Ira s and _ '.'i— a-E-��e-o Ct�tss2(with sralrrlonius) • I not always show the : • --.-1_-.:- - - adwaters of streams. �3T e�r , G Class 2(perennial;salmoniu" ? V` use undetermined) fi r, ' ® class s [145_ ,0� ictet9,�l 1n^.>, r __ _ Unclassifiso I<5` 11 • P. ;`. ,: (,A '`=:i¢ •,. {'t;;'}RCCk!g E ': r F,: _ vP . -„,),F.,:„.,,.„,,,,,, '''$)Y�; '�..&',,.V:'' / -i _ i 'k'.,.,_ r ,3' :>(-' :}$ yE. +at. xc 4S, jiti• ' r:' ,`1 .c:i,.:-L,. ,— .' pl.. 'a, ' ,, !'_-'•- T., I'I -�\!y r,, 3.,Al ry'd:..;,,J ille.t!k`A,f§,!tr.. I 4,.".*.,tt cdt: — ;i ). •.`£; r 10,4,.,,;i?.S S,,,�'r: :I(t`a?y.;r•,:•P,4,r:;4*I j • 4 •lY�. D�ti >..' t j};i'1,*,:-:7- ,r3'. N :I I d C '��' !I�•"r,'7;;i. 1,,•.Fr il�s•t;�':%.:1~;": r}i;S.:.:-,'.i'.f(f��:.,.. i'ipY A f.!1' 'f' �`�r,00,014T 1`''+�4,`k, - 1 r±(� •f• � _Ak �IV,4 ;•Weie •:v,sl04a.41,P'.t".^(�-' .,4t,' l,'`am: ('f':1 ,.I; \ l31 `� 0.''.' }" 1."Y`!�4�' ,?:: .C.L.aJ3 y:Z}'�y� :.:t,.,I A t� ��:. r ,� � �,y� _1. �f�' $(t'z �.. -. _l •• q{'?+,,,;z,z,l4rte „.4,M . i:. ,�''i• .r7 y: •` x,\ ie +tee,' �p i►' !;;• .S', _�1'r ,'::? ,); :�:f''. 'u` .�. r,gYAI :;,•v+s1! � � , , :.i'l i - . Y Ir(I � ' i�_.-.� 'aS:C "a?S:,i !^i�'\.+.. _iJEr' ''gi.:1:7.. • ,,: fir, 3,, ,o-� e". J' l co 1 1.' ;u r,,- ,al. he a..,.,•r _ .'tx Ch,.,,.. ,:-. .r. (` .. 4 (1 ri;r _�' v.�,ti:•.= .NSF: .i�,.�t�..4, .:`} .!:C... tb u. ,� _\ t .: �@I •� ..tf b • v I . 'e' �Y "fa:• nfi+` p� t"rC� k:, .5a.i, 1 In ,L 4..n+n lD, \ .i. 'rA•'`7 .T - '�C( x ,'L: I�,y/ f., 9 u X F,t;.�.1 j �tN,,, -j ,-i`- t,�j' L 4 y �:• '�t'. :;.,1�, ,'4'4;Nk,,.-J1.1':" y,P�-.7�1, '�• ��'-r •:r a�;L �F;,r-zs.. -'Y: 'I �. :i�, ':,.� %`, : . .,r .. :'.i- `'``c- ' :.. k;tw : rtf.:nr;'t,.:IP4. .:1.k I .'` .:,' w.;+. ,1,reg pkc,:es;: :f t e },,:�,,,:�...:r. <�.. 'i' .11 °,,,�'�,-h,n C;ia y„�"�`,{p;,- 'ri aSt .1., �.} .�:.,f ,.`.•, - ;"f__' 'i ,L,mtinP'. .-�t,. ;rf,`;.f` r, •�:';-'•�J�il ..FLes�� .:r `'f.: `'' , .�{:<':-i`� ":k:, • ''--SBrtItr18tT1�Sh! ,::�. �yi -�j,'L�};.tL'y'S.:r;'''s,�':1;'-t�:';;:.''�� Sa•' °J,':dt. ,�•.,f;,�� i �\f ::!. Il� `-H':;•• 5",:a•t> ::`'''. ` a:; t,,,at,•. a�::, ;�.- .yam: '.,3.' ;ir ', , .; ,I,:. w-,:c ?�'.�', .i' •'<- �k1tY'. i'•1 44 -i ij`,,, 1' '1 ..'{!'.. _ st e.f,�' bn,.:•' s•� rY: +:. � II I�.•- j; �{'��i''it.tp� ':I'J: .� ii•:< , ,.., '.:p•::. -.r �;>{^:,r•a��"'i:'.,v,,.�.;' .. :I; ;1qi�,�,�i�;, x.•v� i `i ,4 t ,t� _ ,. ".k,r v��o>:u� '�.•' ;(":• .-�,�t ,- t i.;r i;{;i,:ram.:,'.;..r c�'L, <- .,Il=. •t - r; t - .I,? :f 1.... �t.arenw, -�•a,, _.t�::n�i<>i�: .,t ';�•':� ,..vme n. 'r�. ,1... �.�� \% �'Y%:1n+'. .,)f.r(/.- Imo".. :•5;�{!��'��S. ,�y I. trt i` ^�t+":... .•('f C.• `-1`. t�,r. ,,,rr.,;.�rrv<,: :, 1./.,,;,F.;i. ,.`�f :,vf.' .L:.,.1. •,,: ?..>. Is ist 2. .,r;:, ,I,mIrtercer s�. d_, , -\: •C -�1 :; :!- n:?..,if...,....., ti w�: - JrJ.,,})'`iYr'i:?',?: 1.x� !.1. .� ,n;,�:...t•;••;:,'.,yA t .:i • — 1� ! W \a. /) .7 - M',• _ >r._ •:t'if`;i. �:iA;'�.;'-; ._:_� ;�;, ;•Gp ICre�k. '� 'r '"1" - s:r,: ;,31r,-.d _ 1. .9' -1,,^,ej,!,,r' -,.1 ^, •`•4�•... i. 1\' A �% if .:9`s'r`.Y,•4.,M a,:S>7J'.I 1'�;;.,\(l, '�vaStl ��."- i.': .�-`1•., _ f' 'j 1,- 4S..J 1I.'ti� 4't: 34;�?',. d t e I \(�2Lt•. t;_ t 1 1':1•, 1. , .'sly. :.T^•.10:'i" l--:i.•.._ .Yi.E,({.:Clark}: t1"• . . L_ ; `�! '':',-,.- -l. {t >'. It._' .F.)c•r ;1iki :I. .I :t14,Jt .;vv'•.'-"•t _ • '\:' 'i( tom..`+f. ..,'J: • t,• '.('.�• f. .t,' - `a •i .I,,..,,.tY: �I - i II >4D� �yt '1i i•p�:_ .r i 1: _r>+n r c, ti i�-q_.�- .,.-„d��' ;'- :{c.•*r \amain _ -..._� '�: ;i.* t,I,y�'. ',a,, t:i...`i?,,ai2 ,`Illi::; ! '4 tN"1:1.I Y ` >i "'HJ :.hr}.`-:�,•,� h' ... ill :� `�'-• .. -t!fk':.. 1: Y:�'i. :�^,.� 't�= •r�•;s'': 'D. �;:�,�c�'=<-varG_..)t.E.l, � :""'� 9.;�� `;�u;: ( �J:� •`!'•i': .raid' �„, ( ..a�,cy .:=6 't..�.: 9 L. •- - :-1^ .::.`, d sk,,, ..jj4;l1E3 - - L'1 ,ti' ,.S U,`i.'-:r1. \ 1, ._- 9 tit � >err,'. .i>!�, � r•-.. axe 4= -vr- .1' ,� Y a-•R ="� :.x\.W,�I,-.'yr - .��• ,.r.,.S.j• i� 5 sr+.,'i"fr.r rt',��- e �: ,<'t.+h' .it :,,i`'`ti'�T.+,t: :'':;*r:^Y�,-``'� I i• ..d' �Y •",.\' 4. ..:� .'�`A1•, "I' `4.,,. ,,, r:vry' sde :.•9.: .tn 1�F. ;'%::s,7 s45 0 1'_ �',i .mot. t•r \t.:,: {s.J, 1' 'y t 7:.;1• .i, rC,, ,vir.%i .t.�.dbav ,. p'hin!t0 ', • \' F u-..1;;• �'L� ^.t;> ,,.,."'v,4r:.;_.,.,5:\,;+:. ,�� 'U:/.�'':�S'�"i't.,:)'�'" .,f �t�. � I�. - _� . �5•k1.::.-v i.: li ;•.: •:,:i1:;tts,7,:.y, -\;: i /.•:5•f `'I,:::;,,. 4. 'a' • , • ..1' % • .¢,�t'�`•'m,:� g.+ ,,+' �7{a, _i:''+.:'>tt..>_:db'�'9..'yt.. ). :I .c -zs:✓/• �h,.is .. �1 .. y ,'"T'i HRi _�, ��'4�':: .le>';.,i+:.a .,r•t r.,. _ '>+,y-�= -,%� car, •ry�`•t_-a. •�- •— .t.. t.- : -(it:.: - t ,b-'`'/ - ,,tf:+x,;• 'r,1. „'.7?,( ' z.'•.:1,..S -:i:p:-4 4...Lrvt• v.I •,Ai (• �\...;, :. ' jt. ,,,r.' j •`Rl.• .t •.k..id4tf� �}:tf'.'A' e '`' /Li+„:h:.". ' • ,,'. " k ,{c .rh_• t .f� r bi+. °°"-'':ya� rn 'r,';t.3..��,:yyx„•I� 4 kc_-ia:�'t.'_` =:�1<. yu.}.,`;,. '+ /,{ •'a ay4,g4,tea:. t;' ,y,?..�;5 :^ :,?,.- ..'e"t1:, .aiF,at;,. '.,-r-, •pJ t `� :rt,. :=x- _''tktl'r.-,var*t. «�'^ -.,:. .Als. 4tc.,''„•�I•.f,.e '- i:l �. ,.is�r' F� 1�` y,� b'�,ic',.lr�l�}i:�Sts1i.r✓�'•;` ,:r .�.. �' n�r'2J:.v'=' :*. �•'i'.. `, ` •�'T-�rP � � .�,,,r j ",: 2.. � %`-,, '•t`l.�v � tt?.-,<s+ .l,,i;>- ,t>,,.y. >,?;itl'.t. W`'.' 't o,m .,�n�r,`�' 14� � ,,;,,,,..'-le i.,, Vsn:?;94,�:J:, .... .,i0 , .,,s,a:•,,.SsMes1;+t,,. i ,...,A• +rfi,s'S t 'F 1• 4'. \, i i •'"^:. li:i !-'��. • • :f�� .r,.;,'-av•t :1 "1!.�r". �'f,7 ;.x�e+r.5 t,:�vrt"'E��Jait•Eri'`a r,`3:� ..t � -'t. :,v t•.. , t.::k, r.}p. a:{7' ,n!:,, 'f':r a5ta, ,e igK;civet '9�1f�t �j. ;1;qY,' /11=t �j \� _;l' ;��is', :R..�;t:J;;,:. wr+'�. �.T ,att�.,',raM .h?,. ...w,.. S,y?w+., _= r...L:'� , .\�, '� �C�'�•� .. 'r= 1°!,�`N.i' ;� I r L�.k "s.. ��p�4i.�ufj t � .,.s •a;; r;. Bey?%.�rmt1� i' �i'� - - _��.. �,-:... ,!.',1' 9/�. ,..'4;. f!I:L`'"h7-` �y 1.•u:'.,1.3t%,'..xx?:"L�,. ,}fit `a�:. 'J71BNr� _ (.j',`"..t+�;.. !mot, • p, .�'.` ,:;. .� -.'w. iaftW ...,J.. ,.A 'Cfe'i'�=)s ,.:.:v'C+� A. !:`}„'lam.✓J�.F' f:- - 1 _::: 'it�;.��- :.. '��`��.a.t'te,;'L,.;'<t�%r, g; 5;:.,"..ify��,,-.rt-+,a;,r�::y,,_ ''19. r it�,� al.! • " .•~fi„ ";'" ,. • ,.: - �»�:! -;h#..i�.�.�1j,;;.:..,n�..= s\,,,h,;'K,. .�:Y,n r 1';wow. 4 ,�'/�..� .s„',�_�''� Y'`./ ��.,. ��GVY.. .'%:. �R •,,• ;l,I,! '��.'',i o�fy_.xl;,�YnG. .r�;,W+' _`_^��^f-x'h 7� r�. ,:ttT•,lkf'r..x ^v�'�.__.-- .r,� _�'4'' ,.�,�,' 1�' .fi>=k:;}, ,,.. .c.- ,..;tf ;,r4•'ral _:i>C. ��,.. C.- ,� .! �,;•�• �';�,_::='�. jI� � _.1 ...,1 k !, '4 4.fal Kt-tb3s.- .i,,t0s: `•t„', 'x*;,;,,\',. -t1.- 3:._ _yam • f• VIOL/3. ::,x.dt< i.•> ,.? :y ::r,,::•.. '. Y.1- i C' • - ;^t;, _z-i ., ,h�#+'4>a ..s: --�_-` ,yam - - -�:-' • i-�'-�'�- -...•: ytt. ,�_" x:fi. ,7:' .`F't,t3'?rFli� t,(,ra,,,a• ,:i' L..'., "a-\; -•- •_ ••5t••. '':'. 1 '- - prS;(} '73 .>'a:.n^''•i:e`? -fi'g ..>�. r'.s,4:.-';.n zy�..:�; . :'' -- d:"!I is k ,h., .f,.. 'k •W . 7=4. ,Sep, .,, xr •a';�:'.'. :7i,1,.`7,: -,4,L,. .t - - . `\;' (1 ox- �•V� :.�;i s,�...''� :r.t,I�;t:2 U,,,J.`�n., J.r�. ,syr,t:.ru.�.!Y;:n^ ,I`` fr j(r Yt.am: ..••i�, •ri► .3�,,,.Yl-�h.•'F �tlfG''2� wSt ;:,`:[+mI•r'`r" S. __ .,yr;i. _� \jj:• Y..'\ !< '.3-:'• ,, a-cr`",. ' ''` t,je )1 .Al;ft it:%i:` •ii 1, .p>.s % ��:' - \ { �1_ — 4'\, .t��,!� ''¢;tg'r? 'I. ': ��_ aifftr� x:a•"F}'i ct'>tSrr^rf`,i1+'..Y'�',1�.1f:,irx�:�7t+'��,:r' r:3 ,. ',, ....At a.<; - , ' ,I ▪,ri Jrl/,.,td ,\v c sorkt,agy"•'S?7'tja,•,x,, ,gip,. ,,�',,ixvi,:.+,,`',�,Di. b,. :,••• t,' : t— ',ff-`� G_�; ,... q-'1'; 6. -i�+� - F,. ::i t' zr,,.�K,4. -.1 t4Ati Se,aq i:i.V E �: `'�� 4`� 1(" .4:. 5; ' .'1.• ..; ...1._.• -., .,_ ,;�'�'. _ .L ,I"' + �•I a� .ri.:i '71.,t;�,"i'a >"3,, r-S'i�'= ��": ti�l l 1t �� 'y\S, y @x fi;s'c v:.... „fl':;, t • •��{ s Py ;...•yqi . ag L 9'' ,e -1., ,�.' 'e� ::a:, }".,...1'",s.�. z ! ' i.,,.'!..x i.? ,, 4,i' s.or, '.444.:-',t %e'P.. J,t. • � M : ., :)' . ar :: r,:.r�l r.- t,..,cai,,'��t'''ti't`•`` .S'',,.. .ILrh:,r td I'' ''�': lei t�' '1 .. "•.ff:. `1°'t�'-='`r'ii.d .Y�f .,V'' �Ji'i ': r,_�` i'1x4.^ *�>.+s.'-';,i(Y', r• yttw',f';'G� :.f.' :� :� 1 \ +. - �'Lijy .,•,r ��$t t, tt 's+,.;...: i-,�`,�i0,.`t�;y..4::1'�i,%It••ti'e:�qa$: .�,.!':' n�� 'r.:,•.� ',�'• • -r• ''. ,., :i'•'iE:-•,;•`x.. - ).F 1 :1 :'." �s J•! „ro{�t:: �}�1't '1',�`,�w r .'; i `-L:i,,_ •,. "-'a c �� '.'/.. •�• :sth:'i::�r 4 v.i::„.:,.rst4�'y,�.��rwef l'•�I •�':�r ;.,n:�+;� :' a� i gtdq. ''t - .}' ,':3°tt rs3,. :1:4:' �+Yn:� i' �,1�.` .,.•'Y'.` :J' 'S - •� Jf: `�-m- - - -'1:1,_s•_ _ 1p: b.. .!t't..,,.,;,..,,.J.r'vL. , .t:,f ,.t,.j ., ;a •,.,. i'-19i:4b,'"'t:,2v lf'4 wf.'14 ..vic�i't P`•�c''''' x:.'11.1 ;,.,' -00-• :01. ut'',5..e .L.;,t,. w••.:-.-•:;1--. 'd' •INNS] - i,r� •.:, I' ...:. \ '{'m, , •� •�x��. - - .�- '�.;({�..i�q'jf aroma `i'� ez��';;{•:,•. ."�;.� :,:� _ r^y �� i 1��.+4. :?�. � � ?;-ti 2t ,• _ h';t•41. •• `,, .' r_3.,},f'�0,1s .7��:.t i''', i\tF' \ ��t 1'"ma �iral ,J ' -.` ._: iC.. ta` (� ▪ ''r.f°l:f' I .T..y'„ .. ,. , ,1;:.`,:',,, , ll? ..:,SJ .. '„ - g�} ma. �ft:takm • ,,`. d � r.' ti __ •,J� _ "�'+f "''<'%^1:, fT. ;j, '•�`'n 4�� p, :J':''., ., ':y' n-' —T6' �`/\� :.�..T 1111 „,=ai:V •.:•' ��,. x f. I y...; Lx f • :",.. _ • • a_4p: °br.• it :-, t,' •Yr,.;`"-:t?'.'\•. .�- z>S '= '} '1)1,•'E,pt!.� • :'{0'a .,^3•^.�,,;. •• v ,1.L -•� i ,,,,-T-"— - . ,. ',F, 1,` • ' ' I - ' 'A:.. •C 1.i y\,.4,;:ei I::+ .k".t` -v 4`-- ;_1-, 'In 1' �I °:. .. -p)F.,:}::... n :Lt .,1 ••} 'i 4 '.'' ;,. ":? :\t:" 'i:. — .i.1 :.I, 'I:..' .4-.....},:,a 6 •..r 4ry 1 •, t= , ' _ ' i:�J `,,;,'r ¢[.�' .1 i:Pd., r:- Y n :G .L_J ,...;T: ,...,...., 1\k.-:i.:•ti-:- .•-•f•-`,' .- • * .' • ** ....::.........-7-..,,,, ,i.„ :iv,i.',..;...p...4•.;111-Iluiri. ;g...41,;.:,,,5i,•,-...: ..•...:,,,-A,-'"`... ',ALI,- ' :-•-•(4.,• ., Q 0, :, Y.}." !?ey•,;14b- , - A E ', :P Ali;` : fl'' Kf Zr. .jam ` •f `a. ::'.. +. i .`' ;nx.` i y@� ,' 'tZ` . �uNY`I:u. r,'/ts .a;si; }rt'r' - � .�• -:..< ��i•=;r.:,, ..,et�r. :�! r��y ••�{i::.x`1. - e, , ;L rt;�t'' �,, .I: -,•�s`;-'ram • .•.�tr tyb R s ..I f^'_i'^, :.�IC'i:�ae -.'i. .y,... +yt ,` i- • _k ---1 `�� J �.� _ �'.i_•,., rrk .•,�'�.� -� , .:� d'• �' Lo f'CdAr iir�� ... . 1S' ii�t - r J '1�� `•'K .,'A�!i:t �\tto, ,.+ ,�.'�`l.~it•,., 1 •,�'"':'`'�:S.L.L,� / :�: _ —. • • i !f tlJ} n+'�;•�1,=•'1-.•._�` ;.ti�_'.+4..a... -� . .. ',• R':-:'..ts.� ,i�' �.�� y';'k_ av=e",.!• ;,.•. "i�F•��;1:``.'�::a16�9.��: �4_�.. � 'k': h7 -- .i. S,a'.`.'.:: ,t_;, _ - p i•'- -11 ,�' ` r,;b +,' ' ..I't;,,.:i-:'cam,• •-^'t. f `,\.)17' ' , j:iI:SU, _ �q`L� liqq G&' � •s``•� .' 'et-11j'7: '-t: I r,�,•"�,::' '� �[�•' } i^ :`:• • • fm'c,., p r�" , el,,l '"t,'•`v .... .,`1 -,th'4 +.•f. ,--:,,.., 'r-,, ,7 1� v`'1 4.: 'ii• '\ j' f.: 1�: -a't;,,, ,1 ':� I�. � � .�`'-• -r'\Ci �•"9�e I, / :'?£a1 ip_ a.� :.'Fs. P.•t�a '-->''`r'_51,4 •1t�. %>- :\�,. .i ^ �} :z. 17 ▪ -- 1P,r: 'tk'; } 1')':• % Y.'fi!. �_ ftr� \... • .. �., :: 1 ,;;, _ -- . ;' fir" 1r( ..i 3, �'.5b_ tJ � Ica: \ , ! f:. .c� i,._^,;,.:'-r. ' ::�:, - Xnt'. ,.;t;y •fi II,, ,}- : - I ); :r . ., F • • :r `!' c .' 4uec RI ..f r v.L„ _ 'F; t;. fir' �I I. n- - .,_y;' . '�`• '.:... rryT.4. '!. _ .S- 11 .1.. �tl lji•s!- 1,,qA .., ;,t _i;.i 1 • r' •r 1 1 1 ..4.1.. °f.' ., �. 'ti j wa iiiiill.fu r • -is I1 +4' ,�. :'w 'L i J� y ppt ,� I. G ro. x n - !•,i i, lam,., . ,r(: ` ,,' =��' ''! I,`',r._ '� 25 ``ti. a:^;_ 1 '•s•. ~ ' •S .] • :r`'�LLJI t •S:N,r.+e' •• f' r 'i ` I ;,,E.:2217) ?, , •�° '.:�, I4i ir :'t I .,' r; .`a, ,_i J — ,SO s•Cree11! 1114 -F'1=: 2` 'v N� -C\ 1=' [t -1 k-,:::`f . J`' IT :/,,4, 'tom;' L';:...:.1':I ® ,i .. .ib�, .c '. iI .. iv,.. -••� . -ct:pt trios^ with an � ~ ` .. .- ....- �,,J1�Yt are included in thc. r•;� �'c'- Wetlands DuriaCtitS� • 4 The ijnated ,•a„ ha'n: :-:-.,:' I. . ._. by a vr.ri y of •:: Open Water i 1;{' r1 Led 'b' are ni f? 3`1'1 ' I,0 Wildlife Ser:':ct: ' gym1! • l•rr>', but their Rica- • !L[It'?!�.''rz Basin Boundaries (, x'S'Fi;`"-i. :„rifted. • i.110. Sub basin Boundaries "<<'�'1 ' 4\1 \00 • BIOFILTRATION SWALE WORKSHEET 1998 Surface Water Design Manual • Project: kMY\b 141 PO ; METHODS.OF ANALYSIS (Section 6.3.1.1) • Step 1) CalcuIate design flows • Biofiltration swales generally precede other water quality facilities (See menus'in 6.1) Design flows depend on sequence with detention facility. (Section 6.2.1) Preceding detention Qwq=60%2-yr, developed, KCRTS flow with 15-min time step Following detention Qwq=2-yr release rate from detention facility If no high flow bypass Qioo-yr (cfs) High flows bypass or flow through(6.3.1.1) • Q25-yr 1 Z. (cfs) See 3.2.2 KCRTS/Rimoff files Method Q2-yr / O/ (cfs) " Water quality design flow Qwq (cfs) " • Rainfall Region: Seatac or Landsburg? rw'pr iw L, See Figure 3.2.2.A • Soil Type:Till or outwash? OarWA5 See Table 3.2.2 B Forest (acres). Areas draining to swale(3.2.2) Pasture • . . . • (acres) " • Grass (acres) " Wetland • (acres) " • Impervious�t;: ., :a :..) • 2, 69) (acres) „ Scale Factor: f, See Figure 3.2.2.A Time Step: hourly or 15-min? 15-min Required"15 min" (6.2.1) Data Type:,Reduced or historic? g ;, ,u. rt`( Recommend"Reduced" (3.2.2.1) Step 2) Calculate swale bottom width • b= Qwq n,,,,q bottom width of swale !2 61 (ft) Simplified Manning's formula 1.49 y167 so.5 Q;,q= ' water quality design flow [ (1' (cfs) Calculated in Step 1 n,,,,q= Manning's roughness coefficient . 0.20 Required 0.20 y= design flow depth O 11 (ft) Mowed 2 in.(0.17ft),Rural 4 in. (0.33ft) s= longitudinal slope, along flow 0, g�, (feet/ft) If the bottom width is calculated to be between 2 and 10 feet,proceed to Step 3. If bottom width is less than 2 feet,increase width to 2 feet and recalculate the design flow depth(y). If bottom width is more than 10 feet:increase longitudinal slope(s),increase design flow depth(y), install flow divider and flow spreader,or relocate swale after detention facility Step 3) Determine design flow velocity • v,,,q= Qwq/AWq design flow velocity 0,z7 (fps) Flow Continuity Eq. AWq= by+Zy` 2.d (sf) Cross-sectional area at design depth Z= side slope length per unit height (feet/ft) Select now If the velocity exceeds 1.0 foot per second,go back to Step 2 and modify longitudinal slope,bottom width,or depth. If the velocity is less than 1.0 foot per second,proceed to step 4. Biowksh3 10/23/98 5:47 PM • Step 4) Calculate swale length • L=540 v,,,,q =swale length 14 (ft) 540= hydraulic residence time (s) v,,,q= design flow velocity (') , 2_17 (fps) Calculated in Step 3 If the length is less than 100 feet,increase the length to 100 feet,leaving the bottom width unchanged. If the swale length can be accommodated on the site,proceed to Step 6. If the length is too long for the site,proceed to Step 5. Step 5)Adjust swale layout to fit on site. Reduce swale length and increase bottom width to provide an equivalent top area. Atop=(bi+bstope)I-;=(bt+bsiope)Li 2 i ci�(sf) Calculate top area at WQ design depth b= in-etlea`sed"bottom width 9 0 (ft) Select now bsiope= 2Zy (ft) top width above sides Iv 02 (ft) LF .redieed swale length =. (ft) Select now;Required minimum 100 ft Go to Step 3 and recalculate design flow velocity(v)using bf. • Step 6)Provide conveyance capacity for flows higher than Owa .Meet conveyance requirements of Section 1.2.4. and check conveyance and velocity of high flows. A) Qc= 1.49/nc• Ac R2'67 s '05 (cfs). Manning's Eq.; 100-yr or 25-yr flow in Step 1 nc= Manning's roughness coefficient Manning's"n"from Table 4.4.1 B A<= byc+Zyo2 (sf) . Cross sectional area Ro= Ap/(b+2yo(Z2+1)o'5) (ft) Hydraulic Radius • s= longitudinal slope, along flow (ft/ft) Selected in Step 2 yc= depth of 25-yr or 100-yr flows (ft) Calculate now v100=Q100/A1o0 (fps) If vloo exceeds 5.0 feet per second,return to Step 2 and increase the bottom width or flatten slope. Size Summary . • • Land area is needed for the channel, access, setbacks, and, if necessary, area to convey high flows. Atop= Water surface at conveyance depth (sf)• • Cross section includes depth, channel slope x length,and,if necessary,underdrain and high flows. Slope times length= (ft) From Steps 3,4 and 6 OTHER CRITERIA(Section 6.3.1.2) .. Swale Geometry ' . Water Depth - Flow Velocity,.Energy Dissipation and Flow Spreading ' • Underdrains • Swale Divider , k .i 1 i�1: r '~ Access - 6,' Soil and plantings . Liners (Section 6.2.4) Setbacks (Section 6.2.3) . Biowksh3 10/23/98 5:47 PM r ' OEOTECH September14, 1999 CONSULTANTS, INC. 13256 NE 20th Street,Suite 16 JN 99330 Bellevue,WA 98005 (425)747-5618 FAX(425)747-8561 The Bennett Corporation 9 Lake Bellevue Drive, Suite 204 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Attention: Ryan Fike O VECOP C/�O M6- p INNING Subject: Transmittal Letter— Geotechnical Engineering Study ��R Proposed Heritage Arnold Project 2 5 2000 South 7th Street and Beacon Way Southeast C Renton, Washington �0 Reference: Hart Crowser, Inc.; Abandoned Mine Assessment, Heritage Arnold Property, Renton, Washington; August 16, 1999. Dear Mr. Fike: We are pleased to present this geotechnical engineering report for the proposed residential subdivision to be constructed at the Heritage Arnold property in Renton. The scope of our work consisted of exploring site surface and subsurface conditions, and then developing this report to provide recommendations for general earthwork, design criteria for foundations, retaining walls, and pavements and mitigation of potential coal mine subsidence hazards. This work was authorized by your acceptance of our proposal, P-5004, dated August 16, 1999. The subsurface conditions of the proposed building site were explored with fourteen test pits that encountered native topsoil and weathered, gravelly sand overlying dense to very dense, gravelly sand. Loose fill with concrete rubble, construction debris, and household garbage was encountered as deep as 13 feet below existing grade on the western portion of the site. It appears that the small rise in this area consists of fill. Single-family residences may be supported on conventional foundations bearing directly on native, medium-dense to dense, gravelly sands. Depending on the final site grades and on the locations of the residences, some overexcavation may be required to expose competent bearing soils. The fill soils are not suitable for supporting the loads associated with the proposed development; foundations in these areas either will need to be overexcavated, or be pile- or pier-supported. The site is underlain by three deep coal seams, which were mined until the early 1920s. Hart Crowser, Inc. developed a report detailing mine activity and potential subsidence issues at the subject site. Applicable recommendations from their study have been incorporated into this report. h The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 September 14, 1999 Transmittal Letter—Page 2 The attached report contains a discussion of the study and our recommendations. Please contact us if there are any questions regarding this report, or if we can be of further assistance during the design and construction phases of this project. Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Associate EMT/MRM: alt GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Proposed Heritage Arnold Project South 7th Street and Beacon Way Southeast Renton, Washington This report presents the findings and recommendations of our geotechnical engineering study for the site of the proposed subdivision in Renton. We were provided with a topographic map. Mead Gilman & Associates developed this plan, which is dated July 28, 1999. Development of the property is in the planning stage, and detailed plans were not made available to us. Based on conversations with Ryan Fike, we understand that the site will be developed with a number of single-family residences. We anticipate that access to the residences will be via paved common streets and private driveways. We were also provided with the Abandoned Mine Assessment, prepared by Hart Crowser, Inc. This report, which is dated August 16, 1999, discusses historical coal mining activity at the subject site and provides recommendations to protect the development from significant hazards presented by potential ground subsidence. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS The Vicinity Map, Plate 1, illustrates the general location of the site. The triangular, approximately 10.4-acre site is located near the intersection of South 7th Street and Beacon Way Southeast. The property is bordered on its southern, angled side by the Cedar River Pipeline easement, and on its northern and eastern sides by single-family residences and undeveloped woodlands, respectively. The northeastern property corner is located at the top of a steep, undeveloped slope. This slope has an estimated height of 30 feet and an inclination of 50 to 60 percent. The terrain on the site is generally rolling, with small rises and hollows located throughout the parcel. It appears that some grading has been done on the property, resulting in a steep, U-shaped cut slope located near the center of the site. An abandoned gravel road winds through the southeastern side of the site and ends at the steep cut slope. The flat area at the base of the cut slope may have been a gravel pit at some time during the past. The small rise.located on the western side of this flat area consists of fill; some pea gravel is visible on the surface. The westernmost portion of the site is strewn with large amounts of household garbage and construction debris, and appears to have been used as a dump. The eastern portion of the site is densely wooded with tall evergreen and deciduous trees. The ground is covered with ferns, blueberry and blackberry bushes, and other low-growth vegetation. No obvious signs of slope instability were observed during our site visit. Additionally, no visible indications of air shafts, trenches, or ground subsidence were observed on the portions of the site that we traversed. • l GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 September 14, 1999 Page 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating fourteen test pits at the approximate locations shown on the Site Exploration Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration program was based upon the proposed construction and required design criteria, the site topography and access, the subsurface conditions revealed during excavation, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. The test pits were excavated on August 26, 1999 with a trackhoe. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface soil were collected from the backhoe bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as Plates 3 through 9. The test pits encountered native topsoil overlying loose, gravelly sand that became medium-dense to dense with depth. This native sand contained occasional boulders. The test pits on the westernmost corner of the site encountered loose fill that contained construction debris and concrete and asphalt rubble to depths of 10 to 13 feet. Native sand was encountered underlying the fill, except in Test Pit 3, which revealed fill to the maximum 12-foot depth that was possible. • The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information only at the locations tested. • The relative densities and moisture descriptions indicated on the test pit logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during excavation. The compaction of backfill was not in the scope of our services. Loose soil will therefore be found in the area of the test pits. If this presents a problem, the backfill will need to be removed and replaced with structural fill during construction. Groundwater No groundwater seepage or wet soil was observed during excavation. It should be noted that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors; the absence of groundwater in our explorations does not eliminate the possibility that groundwater could be encountered during future excavations. However, due to the granular nature of the site soils, encountering significant near-surface groundwater is unlikely. We anticipate that groundwater could be found between the near-surface weathered soil and the underlying denser soil. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GENERAL • Based on our explorations at the subject site, it is our opinion that construction of the proposed single-family residences is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. The proposed residences may be supported on conventional foundations bearing directly on medium-dense to dense, native soil. Depending on final site grading, some overexcavation may be required to • expose competent sand. The loose fill encountered on the western corner of.the site is not suitable GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • ,The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 • September 14, 1999 Page 3 to support the loads associated with the proposed development. The fill should be removed from building areas, or deep foundations should extend to the underlying, native, gravelly sand. We can provide recommendations and design criteria for driven piles or drilled piers, if requested. The steep slope near the northeast corner of the property may experience shallow slope movement in the future. To protect against structural damage, houses and other occupied buildings should be set back at least 25 feet from this slope. No clearing or grading should occur within 10 feet of the slope's crest. Water from drains and impervious surfaces should not be directed toward the steep slope. The site is underlain by three deep coal seams which were mined until the early 1920s. Hart Crowser, ,Inc. completed an assessment of the historical mine use and potential hazards associated with development over abandoned mines. Their study concludes that there is a risk of noticeable differential foundation settlement due to ground subsidence. However, the maximum calculated ground strain would result in a differential settlement of approximately 3 inches in a distance of 50 feet. Because of the approximately 80 years that have elapsed since the last documented mining, it is likely that most subsidence has already occurred. Therefore, the risk of significant area-wide subsidence is low. We highlight the following recommendations as applicable to the proposed development: • All footings should be continuous, with increased steel reinforcement, to span potential isolated subsidence areas and reduce differential settlement. • Post-and-beam construction should be considered to allow for relatively easy releveling in the event of settlement. • Concrete slabs-on-grade should be avoided in favor of floors on joists. • All new construction should include vapor barriers and well-ventilated crawl spaces to mitigate mine gas emissions. • Rigid structural materials, such as concrete and masonry, should be avoided where possible in favor of more flexible materials like steel and timber. • Avoid siding, weather stripping materials, and interior floor and wall coverings that are settlement-sensitive. • Plan regular maintenance for weather stripping, utilities, and mechanical systems which may be affected by building movement. At the time of earthwork, any areas of fill in structural areas should be thoroughly investigated to verify that they are not underlain by old air shafts or mine openings. Ground subsidence could result in distress or damage to pavements and utilities. Periodic maintenance and repair of these elements should be expected. Where the existing fill is not removed, on-grade elements such as pavements and slabs would experience noticeable long-term settlement. Pavements over existing fill should be underlain by at least 18 inches of gravelly structural fill to reduce, but not eliminate, differential settlement. Final slopes in developed portions of the site should be graded to an inclination of no steeper than 2:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the _ weather conditions that are.encountered. We anticipate that a silt fence will .be needed around the GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 September 14, 1999 Page 4 • downslope side of any cleared areas. Rocked construction access roads should be extended into the site to reduce the amount of mud carried off the property by trucks and equipment. Following rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch or hydroseed bare areas that will not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious surface. Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical constraints that become more evident during the review process. CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS The proposed single-family residences can be supported on conventional continuous footings bearing on undisturbed, native, gravelly sand, or on structural fill placed above this competent, native soil. See the later sub-section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL for recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill beneath structures. Adequate compaction of structural fill should be verified with frequent density testing during fill placement. We recommend that continuous footings have minimum widths of 12 and 16 inches, respectively. The foundations should be reinforced to span a minimum distance of 10 feet without soil support, similar to grade beams. They should be bottomed at least 18 inches below the lowest • adjacent finish ground surface. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, this may require removing the disturbed soil by hand. Depending on the final site grades, some overexcavation may be required below the footings to expose competent, native soil. Unless lean concrete is used to fill an overexcavated hole, the overexcavation must be at least as wide at the bottom as the sum of the depth of the overexcavation and the footing width. For example, an overexcavation extending 2 feet below the bottom of a 3-foot-wide footing must be at least 5 feet wide at the base of the excavation. If lean concrete is used, the overexcavation need only extend 6 inches beyond the edges of the footing. An allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) is appropriate for footings supported on medium-dense to dense gravelly sand. For footings supported on structural fill, an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf is appropriate. A one-third increase in these design bearing pressures may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundation and the bearing soil, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical, embedded portions of the foundation. For the latter condition, the foundation must be either poured directly against relatively level, undisturbed soil or be surrounded by level structural fill. We recommend using the following design values for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading: Parameter Design Value Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. .The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 September 14, 1999 Page 5 Where:(i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(ii)passive earth pressure is computed using the equivalent fluid density. If the ground in front of a foundation is loose or sloping, the passive earth pressure given above will not be appropriate. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for the foundation's resistance to lateral loading, when using the above design values. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The site is located within Seismic Zone 3, as illustrated on Figure No. 16-2 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). In accordance with Table 16-J of the 1997 UBC, the soil within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type Sc (Very Dense Soil). The site soils are not subject to seismic liquefaction because of their dense nature and because of the absence of near-surface groundwater. PERMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls backfilled on only one side should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures imposed by the soil they retain. The following recommended design parameters are for walls that restrain level backfill: Parameter Design Value Active Earth Pressure* 35 pcf Passive Earth Pressure 350 pcf Coefficient of Friction 0.45 Soil Unit Weight 135 pcf Where:(i)pcf is pounds per cubic foot,and(ii)active and passive earth pressures are computed using the equivalent fluid pressures. *For a restrained wall that cannot deflect at least 0.002 times its height,a uniform lateral pressure equal to 10 psf times the height of the wall should be added to the above active equivalent fluid pressure. The values given above are to be used to design permanent foundation and retaining walls only. The passive pressure given is appropriate`for the depth of level structural fill placed in front of a retaining or foundation wall only. We recommend a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding, when using the above values to design the walls. Restrained wall soil parameters should be utilized for a distance of 1.5 times the wall height from corners in the walls. The design values given above do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that no surcharges, such as those caused by slopes, vehicles, or adjacent foundations will be exerted on the walls. If these conditions exist, those pressures should be added • to the above lateral soil pressures. Where sloping backfill is desired behind the walls, we will need GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 September 14, 1999 Page 6 to be given the wall dimensions and the slope of the backfill in order to provide the appropriate design earth pressures. The surcharge due to traffic loads behind a wall can typically be accounted for by adding a uniform pressure equal to 2 feet multiplied by the above active fluid density. Heavy construction equipment should not be operated behind retaining and foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of a wall, unless the walls are designed for the additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment. The wall design criteria assume that the backfill will be well-compacted in lifts no thicker than 12 inches. The compaction of backfill near the walls should be accomplished with hand-operated equipment to prevent the walls from being overloaded by the higher soil forces that occur during compaction. Retaining Wall Backfill and Waterproofing Backfill placed behind retaining or foundation walls should be coarse, free-draining, structural fill containing no organics. This backfill should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay particles and have no gravel greater than 4 inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. If the native sand . is used as backfill, a drainage composite similar to Miradrain 6000 should be placed against the backfilled retaining walls. The drainage composites should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system. For increased protection, drainage composites should be placed along cut slope faces, and the walls should be backfilled with pervious soil. The purpose of these backfill requirements is to ensure that the design criteria for a retaining wall are not exceeded because of a build-up of hydrostatic pressure behind the wall. The top 12 to 18 inches of the backfill should consist of a compacted, relatively impermeable soil or topsoil, or the surface should be paved. The ground surface must also slope away from backfilled walls to reduce the potential for surface water to percolate into the backfill. The sub-section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL contains recommendations regarding the placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. The above recommendations are not intended to waterproof below-grade walls. The performance of any subsurface drainage system will degrade over time. Also, groundwater drainage patterns can change, even if seepage is not evident in the temporary excavation. Therefore, if future moist conditions or seepage through the walls are not acceptable, waterproofing should be provided. This typically includes limiting cold joints and wall penetrations, and using bentonite panels or membranes on the outside of the walls. Applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion is not considered waterproofing, but will only help to prevent moisture, generated from water vapor or capillary action, from seeping through the concrete. EXCAVATIONS AND SLOPES Excavation slopes should not exceed the limits specified in local, state, and national government safety regulations. Temporary cuts to a depth of about 4 feet may be attempted vertically in unsaturated soil, away from property lines, utilities, and existing structures, if there are no • indications of slope instability. Based upon Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296, Part N, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 September 14, 1999 Page 7 • the native sand at the subject site would generally be classified as Type B. Therefore, temporary cut slopes greater than 4 feet in, height cannot be excavated at an inclination steeper than 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical), extending continuously between the top and the bottom of a cut. The above-recommended temporary slope inclination is based on what has been successful at other sites with similar soil conditions. Temporary cuts are those that will remain unsupported for a relatively short duration to allow for the construction of foundations, retaining walls, or utilities. Temporary cut slopes should be protected with plastic sheeting during wet weather. The cut slopes should also be backfilled or retained as soon as possible to reduce the potential for instability. Please note that sand can cave suddenly and without warning. Utility contractors should be made especially aware of this potential danger. All permanent cuts into native soil should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should not be constructed with an inclination greater than 2:1 (H:V). To reduce the potential for shallow sloughing, fill must be compacted to the face of these slopes. This could.be accomplished by overbuilding the compacted fill and then trimming it back to its final inclination. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. Also, all permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve the stability of the surficial layer of soil. Any disturbance to the existing steep slope beyond the northeastern corner of the site may reduce the stability of the slope. Damage to the existing vegetation and ground should be minimized, and • any disturbed areas should be revegetated as soon as possible. Soil from the excavations should not be placed on, or near, the slope. DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS Foundation drains are required where crawl spaces or basements will be below a structure, or the outside grade does not slope downward from a building. Drains should also be placed at the base of all earth-retaining walls. These drains should be surrounded by at least 6 inches of 1-inch- minus, washed rock and then wrapped in non-woven, geotextile filter fabric (Mirafi 140N, Supac 4NP, or similar material). At its highest point, a perforated pipe invert should be at least 6 inches below the bottom of a slab floor or the level.of.a crawl space, and it should be sloped for drainage. Drainage should also be provided inside the footprint of a structure, where a crawl space will slope or be lower than the surrounding ground surface, or an excavation encounters significant seepage. We can provide recommendations for interior drains, should they become necessary, during excavation and foundation construction. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system. A typical drain detail is attached to this report as Plate 10. For the best long-term performance, perforated PVC pipe is recommended for all subsurface drains. No groundwater was observed during our field work. If seepage is encountered in an excavation, it should be drained from the site by directing it through drainage ditches, perforated pipe, or French drains, or by pumping it from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 September 14, 1999 Page 8 The excavations and site should be graded so that surface water is directed away from the tops of slopes. Water should not be allowed to stand in any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements_ are to be constructed. Final site grading in areas adjacent to the buildings should slope away at least 2 percent, except where the area is paved. Water from roof, storm water, and foundation drains should not be discharged onto slopes; it should be tightlined to a suitable outfall located away from any slopes. PAVEMENT AREAS The pavement sections may be supported on competent, native soil or on structural fill compacted to a 95 percent density. We recommend that the pavement subgrade must be in a stable, non- yielding condition at the time of paving. Granular structural fill or geotextile fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet, or unstable areas. To evaluate pavement subgrade strength, we recommend that a proof-roll be completed with a loaded dump truck immediately before paving. In most instances where unstable subgrade conditions are encountered, an additional 12 inches of granular structural fill will stabilize the subgrade, except for very soft areas where additional fill could be required. The subgrade should be evaluated by Geotech Consultants, Inc., after the site is stripped and cut to grade. Recommendations for the compaction of structural fill beneath pavements are given in a later sub-section entitled GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL. The performance of site pavements is directly related to the strength and stability of the underlying subgrade. The pavement for lightly-loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over 4 inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or 3 inches of asphalt-treated base (ATB). We recommend providing heavily-loaded areas with 3 inches of AC over 6 inches of CRB or 4 inches of ATB. Heavily-loaded areas are typically main driveways, dumpster sites, or areas with truck traffic. The pavement section recommendations and guidelines presented in this report are based on our experience in the area and on what has been successful in similar situations. We can provide recommendations based on expected traffic loads and California Bearing Ratio tests, if requested. As with any pavements, some maintenance and repair of limited areas can be expected as the pavement ages. To provide for a design without the need for any repair would be uneconomical. GENERAL EARTHWORK AND STRUCTURAL FILL All building and pavement areas should be stripped of surface vegetation, topsoil, organic soil, and other,deleterious material. The stripped or removed materials should not be mixed with any materials to be,used as structural fill, but they could be used in non-structural areas, such as landscape beds. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under a building, behind permanent retaining or foundation walls, or in other areas where the underlying soil needs to support loads. All structural fill should be placed in horizontal lifts with a moisture content at, or near, the optimum moisture content. The optimum moisture content is that moisture content that results in the greatest compacted dry density. The moisture content of fill is very important and must be closely controlled during the • filling and compaction process. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. • The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 • September 14, 1999 Page 9 The allowable thickness of the fill lift will depend on the material type selected, the compaction equipment used, and the number of passes made to compact the lift. The loose lift thickness should not exceed 12 inches. We recommend testing the fill as it is placed. If the fill is not compacted to specifications, it can be recompacted before another lift is placed. This eliminates the need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents recommended relative compactions for structural fill: Location of Minimum Fill Placement Relative Compaction Beneath footings or 95% walkways Behind retaining walls 90% 95%for upper 12 inches of Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that level Where: Minimum Relative Compaction Is the ratio, expressed in percentages,of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D 1557-91 (Modified Proctor). Use of On-Site Soil If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the site soils are wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rain and the potential need to dry the site soils. The moisture content of the on-site soil must be at, or near, the optimum moisture content, as the soil cannot be consistently compacted to the required density when the moisture content is significantly greater than optimum. The on-site, non-organic sand could be used as structural fill, if grading operations are conducted during hot, dry weather, when drying the wetter soil by aeration is possible. During excessively dry weather, however, it may be necessary to add water to achieve the optimum moisture content. LIMITATIONS • The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions encountered in the test pits are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all projects. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. • The Bennett Corporation JN 99330 • September 14, 1999 Page 10 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Bennett Corporation, and its representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and conclusions are based on observed site materials, and selective engineering analyses. Our conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. This report, and the study by Hart Crowser, should be provided to any future property owners to inform them of our findings and recommendations. Additionally, this report should be provided in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. ADDITIONAL SERVICES In addition to reviewing the final plans, Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are consistent with those indicated by our exploration, to evaluate whether earthwork and foundation construction activities comply with the general intent of the recommendations presented in this report, and to provide suggestions for design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. However, our work would not include the supervision or direction of the actual work of the contractor and its employees or agents. Also, job and site safety, and dimensional measurements, will be the responsibility of the contractor. We conducted an environmental assessment for this site which is presented in a separate report. The following plates are attached to complete this report: Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Site Exploration Plan Plates 3 - 9 Test Pit Logs Plate 10 Typical Footing Drain GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. z tj -. u d G'J Q ti. v, '#,o WM �, - 3sT. F • z o 'r4 3S AY ,1_'INPIA A SE is.. .-.. W $ VILE ` dY N o .:-.-•..:U----'c., r Y�dK!) �. v 3s �S.l 5�b W I IN Imo' H 3s1 _ ' k _ �, it 1 '� 35 AV �'N1Y2[ --�I J :, N 3 tX :• -N^ odEZI to nr= 3S A� y ze3r I 4 3s ya 3S )I• I .y . ° x:auE2[e g 3S AV CO t3 ui ''' o Y Q �`< ^ v� 35 ArMEE skaxzzt 3S Al 30H1 �( a c� a`'l3 t,, O , „7', 4, _t . 1512I F ^1f elk 1 AV 5 G _! C �` �J h . ® •® V7 ti'' 3S AY a >R C O qy�a 5� ~ N •' ;'r, • �3s l 3s AY 5 •i O AY �,4,, � on woz s H102I ++ l J G `V' �� , _y ,y� V '�A' -I A St d W O�`I` C 1 yS!` "^�� R� ; �`PQ�m� tiFp� �'~ Alt TM 3s Ar gF~1 V N CO 1N z - S Nl[ff S 7 - SONOWO w pv4'o 1b. �r�!' ''�'O y vt"i tit- is xutl %` CO :;` ¢ Obi ti.�d i.rLiar,..7:'''_yq 3S 00991 �1 Iml tti Eit Av � �� !n asd� a�� ;as y o :3s Ay H19II 4 05 C i o O� .1y�bw S y\do ''' dO-- y +3�•bb ' 3S AY HMI .:„' AV F 1 CD � , 3N o2 Nth �� j �' 3513 Tuff oo� arrna 16-['_�3$Ay • at 3S AV N1EII �/ _ w e oae r G� �' I N ai NOSN ? j' NI 4iii 4. G z L Q� �4r Q Z m W 3N. Ar ..: i J3� _ ®YA fbal,'N S, e!' w ,� ,�LNL Q f R. • 1111' qt AY s)!N 3s iimud t 3S AV H1tIi o , ��'o a0 A3a31NOH Q� • 3s 13 13 3s al a �l 3 G ~3s rn� v S� ` /� �: Nis x1a1N • o W N o ED • 3A 0� ~ �h.:t C� sL' 3s 13 nl' z b/ s aoxEs6 W' `> $ 3s .. c CM Aellft,' `� 41 4t � N N : st coxes to 3S A ti +3S�N 44 N �lPI17 l ,' x. I AIRE OOOi a A-1% i •■ -CV in, ®' r l � �pA ®� noo ti „' 35 AV HL fiat ® 3 l✓ ,\\��\ , � S �f!I 3S .�T 1 HLSC 1 0 sir _ G! 7 W��t '' OOI 411061( �— S.�.a• aY033 � R� " 1 ' AY aY033 5 , _��- M ""vow nIN ^� �� ry� tipDsc 9� A� t G x zV iii0 re Mir �— W s s N SAY �i BENSON �© �rUG� S ll 13 Nl n u, 1 \ N111 "'3 W Lin S N �� V',lit.' AY' r s13 AV Nd`Jv ®[� •ne1 \ 1, s y Fib `^ t* k 1 •P [~ 3 m 11 •i 'lIN$ s viei y ithoe,4.-'444 �) sll �J'Oa$ •,n ,n0 I s nr staaow yo 'O " 2`^ J.�.Q r © c' o \Y OO9I "' 'b a • W Iii �W'-• Ci �'' MAY C warm.. ��® L. .. t{i •illTi iTTITC#.. — ,, .. t - a¢O c-ter.,,• _ Q -� oo, ` • . > Ilir NI5 act. RI yv�l_ � O ��a s N �/ C-D • �� `~�N ' y AV �3n11VH5 ■o 6� N ti KE av i // " FRWY v1 S _ N� n Y C ■ ,1 Ytri �'N 1 II e�� .re��v--1sill '' —AY N��1- -RJft � 31m1Yx Y ._��U2f N Y1311'dll 3 !(�' 3< AY wogtlOIAYl ;Ir•'7•... �.� ~%};_ -� 3 N .., NI MN ? AY 31d "'i^= % _ ' �RQ�F. O Sn w AV 31c104 4614 db6 AV ON l w "�!�` ks..,frkiz ... 1 oo[ ✓)�` , N 006 ya5N3A31S 3F'��_ _ wb __sow.._ • r 1 . OOLZ a3 3 1J 1 4.iiir -a..IAMS AV q A ON l o MS - / r :at''"e FJ"- h 1 f �a =,d G s V33N3S MS AV M TAWS v ,C:iJ • / ?e • -13 e .. Ce .� .--Jam. F \ - ^�ry4�./ ° O 9 CP`reTh. • v N 1 ^ o y � •BO �4 ` l' f i'4 7144° \ J\ O -- ? J N� q:.+1.--'.. ..'m'o. I4�/ p\ \ •JJpj •J4e NI. A v'y ©a '\44. A` 1i / Vj V• kfrk • \ NIi . \ q.., : .• \,%Z. \ .,,i r ". , \, • !p v J4' ,° 1 J I q� \ ?.,0 .%)� •J'J N. \\,. c. //�� r I LT/t \ : , , ,V O 7 JO /V�_,, J, \ ...4 ;....,„ ,.. ..... 'is •• . J .. ,, ) ,.....4,.. , 1 c t\\ A 1/ J 'b CijkaD \ \ TA? (...); ) .,-..\01;1,-.."---.--=-_------ . ,-____, , • 13 c".4.;-0 --- . a 4< " ' ":41 '-`ttk-Nk • c./(:=41 q_?-)\..-t .-Itt (:),,,, : % \ ( /�J ie ) ` ,1111 ' A;:,..., r �1 r.4c44• EkV,— �1 ,,,..r i 4 � O •\` / • � ' (by• la � °�t1f..f\ e �ee /° �' ' 0�!\ O � J r la Je • ^�•� • .''.1 ''\ '',.,'''s . ..,e0Y \ .k. &., , --- ravAd. 00/ i . -0 ; • .,. I ..,;\ - 1 /7/, R J •J t �.,1 J'?, f` —�''_•�?\�.J� 4? J / �"1i,.. y,' •{�m� a+C0.4„4o /I ° , / 7,y�/ :to( • �� / \ \j° °• �•J�\i.•J J,�° � 1 �J Orb � J°,° �r�j •��ryA J‘.:A., (1560 (-6, \� •, .. y,J p 11,r° J�, �V Q .J •J)'_\1 re-fr.,.• \ �_),,"'VVV J •JJ°- ° 1 ). y��\\ {(� • I VS ' J •,6 R. 1 , \\ °lam'-� \°V\�•,.�� •J�J� v ` 1 tiboYYr. '., Yp •J• ✓,' O +� �5.� y/� _ _ Q w :, ..,aJL1T1, �Via ,,\ '? 'R1 illir r o-3 _• `` J s r/ a J 1\ `-�J ?....- 0 *� J :° 4 �y/}ram/• j ( _ i 1 �J // p / , l� 'fie / (0 °J ?\ v J / /\ voi• O /\/yVrB° ; , \ �•�!° �At ;�•v'J et 4 01aQ:J\ J •,�� `Di (/�'��•,�\ .1 .��OI ••Ft.7 Vq eR��g1{Ay 1/j, �b W -I' O ° �.:aj' \{\ -` / J^/1[tC'O} 'tJ •J44 'vim ,JOB '�j ^ , 1` Oro) v 4, \ e.._.."r,-q, �\ ° �+ y , „kr, Jp •t, ••J '�1.,O . mt,., .. t. 0 CD w O C• CA ®CfD � Jum ; S°a �Q' C .4.:4_,,_0 Mk 'NI 1.../I 7, .l, • ... 6, ''!.ii. , . -:6- ,,,,,, _,, .,., f -, . /"hS x , -'' 4.4„. • Y Ja0 c • J•\ $J ?- al 0 ) J'7 ° � a' •.. = a) � ro A-I j. { . J // °^ k (\I O 47, 04 e 5 O FO •Ja O,., °° /� e 1.0 I air4F • • C •4J CD w�{ TEST PIT 1 Description FILL Concrete rubble with old building materials, loose (FILL) SP Dark brown, silty SAND, moist, loose (Topsoil) over tan, slightly silty SAND, dry to slightly moist, loose 5 — * Test Pit was terminated at 4 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * Caving was observed to bottom during excavation. 10 — 15'— ,�`�{ TEST PIT 2 .9 Description Topsoil Red-brown SAND, dry to slightly moist, loose (TOPSOIL) Brown, slightly gravelly SAND, medium-grained, dry, loose - becomes more gravelly, slightly moist, medium-dense 5 I SP I' — xis"• r`•"l% - becomes moist, medium-to"::_,. : coarse-grained, less gravelly, dense * Test Pit was terminated at 11 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * Caving was observed to 8 feet during excavation. 15— TEST PIT LOG • GEOTECH South 7th Street & Beacon Way Southeast CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99330 Sept. 1999 EMT 3 • {� `i� TEST PIT 3 o�ati�� ti� & ce9 cP S 4`� Description Dark brown, silty SAND, with concrete rubble, moist, loose (FILL) - piece of old carpet 5 — FILL - asphalt chunks 8-12" in size - becomes gray-black, silty, gravelly SAND 10 — — - large tree stump * Test Pit was terminated at 12 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. 15— * Caving was observed to 12 feet during excavation. # TEST PIT 4 �'� o��24aa,,0�� ( 2 G 4 Description Red-brown, silty SAND, with roots, concrete rubble, and metal debris, dry to slightly moist, loose (FILL) - large asphalt chunk (6 feet across and 6 inches thick) 5 — - some glass, household debris FILL - becomes gray-black, silty, gravelly sand, with asphalt chunks and household debris 10 — sP Red-brown, slightly silty, gravelly SAND, medium-to coarse-grained, moist, ° medium-dense to dense 15— — becomes brown at 13.5 feet, dense * Test Pit was terminated at 14.5 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * Caving was observed to 13 feet during excavation. TEST PIT LOG GEOTECH South 7th Street & Beacon Way Southeast CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99330 Sept. 1999 EMT 4 TEST PIT 5 Description Red-brown, silty, gravelly SAND, with cobbles, brick debris, and household garbage, loose (FILL) - large tree stump and root ball 5 — FILL - becomes gray, slightly silty, gravelly SAND, moist 10 — � Red-brown,weathered, slightly silty SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, medium-dense _. -becomes brown, dense * Test Pit was terminated at 11.5 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. 15— * Caving was observed to 10 feet during excavation. TEST PIT 6 c woo- ( .0y4 Description FILL Red-brown, silty SAND, with abundant roots, dry to slightly moist, loose (FILL) • =' ' 6 inches of dark brown TOPSOIL over _ Red-brown, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, loose 5 _ SP ,; - becomes medium-dense to dense - becomes less gravelly, dense 10 — * Test Pit was terminated at 8.5 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * No caving was observed during excavation. 15— TEST PIT LOG GEOTECH South 7th Street & Beacon Way Southeast CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99330 Sept. 1999 EMT - 5 • {e' °il TEST PIT 7 9Q, Go t .a Description Brown, slightly silty SAND, with abundant roots, dry, loose (TOPSOIL) Red-brown SAND, with occasional boulders up to 1 foot diameter, fine-grained, dry to slightly moist, medium-dense sp - becomes brown, with gravel and cobbles, moist, dense 5 — - 10 — * Test Pit was terminated at 8.5 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * Some caving in upper 4 feet was observed during excavation. 15— l TESTPIT8 4,0 o�� 0, 9e4 CGS G 4 Description Dark brown, slightly silty SAND, with occasional gravel, with abundant roots, dry \to slightly moist (TOPSOIL) Red-brown, silty, gravelly SAND, fine-to medium-grained, moist, medium-dense SM to dense _ - becomes brown, very dense 5 — * Test Pit was terminated at 6.5 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. 10 — * No caving was observed during excavation. 15 TEST PIT LOG GEOTECH South 7th Street & Beacon Way Southeast CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: . Logged by: Plate: _99330 -- . 'Sept. 1999 EMT 6 {e' TEST PIT 9 c GtoyDescription \Dark brown, silty SAND, loose (TOPSOIL) Red-brown, silty, gravelly SAND, with abundant roots, fine-grained, moist, SM medium-dense - becomes brown, dense to very dense 5 — * Test Pit was terminated at 5.5 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * No caving was observed during excavation. 10 — 15— TEST PIT 10 Sao o�ti�� a�ti� �C c 4 Description .Topsoil Red-brown TOPSOIL, loose Brown, silty, gravelly SAND, with abundant roots, fine-to medium-grained, moist, SM medium-dense to dense SM 5 _ - becomes dense to very dense * Test Pit was terminated at 5.5 feet on August 26, 1999. _ * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * No caving was observed during excavation. 10 — 15— TEST PIT LOG GEOTECH South 7th Street & Beacon Way Southeast CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99330 Sept. 1999 EMT 7 • {� `�1 TEST PIT 11 fie. G° a �5 Description Dark brown, silty SAND, with abundant roots, moist, loose (TOPSOIL) • Red-brown SAND, medium-grained, moist, medium-dense SP - becomes dense, brown 5 — — * Test Pit was terminated at 7 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. 10 — * Some caving of upper 4 feet was observed during excavation. 15— ei TEST PIT 12 G 4 Description Dark brown, slightly silty SAND, with abundant roots, dry to slightly moist(TOPSOIL) ...Sp Reddish-brown SAND, with some gravel and sandstone chunks, medium-grained, moist, medium-dense to dense 5 - -becomes brown, very dense * Test Pit was terminated at 6 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * No caving was observed during excavation. 10 — 15— TEST PIT LOG GE O TE C H South 7th Street & Beacon Way Southeast CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington Job No: Date: Logged by: Plate: 99330 Sept. 1999 EMT 8 , . % • , ,, . �w� �` v< TEST PIT 13 d��K2)ua�� ° Ng, C? ,�4 Gts°' 4) Description Dark brown, silty SAND, with abundant roots, dry to slightly moist, loose (TOPSOIL) — ` SP Red-brown SAND with gravel, medium-grained, moist, medium-dense - becomes brown, dense to very dense 5 — * Test Pit was terminated at 5.5 feet on August 26, 1999. * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. _ * No caving was observed during excavation. 10 — 15— .,2,�,c4, TEST PIT 14 �,� „o a,�'`��4°'o\ & c G 4 Description .'' ' ' Red-brown, slightly silty SAND,with abundant roots, fine-grained, dry to slightly moist, loose N;;,,.;`;:%, -becomes medium-dense i; SSPP — ` ` -becomes moist, dense to very dense 5 — * Test Pit was terminated at 5 feet on August 26, 1999. — * No groundwater seepage was observed during excavation. * No caving was observed during excavation. 10 — 15— TEST PIT LOG `. GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. South 7th Street & Beacon Way Southeast `- Renton, Washington _��. Job No: Date: Log ged by: Plate: 99330 Sept. 1999 EMT 9 • • Slope backfill away from foundation. NNN ✓� TIGHTL/NE ROOF DRA/N Do not connect lb footing drain. BACKFILL See text for I— VAPOR BARR/ER /requirements. SLAB • WASHED ROCK o°.'.'°'. `7`^• :: •;; `,�•�� 4"min. L 6 min. FREE-DRA/N/NG NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE SAND/GRAVEL FILTER FABR/C 4"PERFORATED HARD PVC.PIPE Invert at least as low as footing and/or crawl space. Slope to drain. Place weepho/es downward. TYPICAL FOOTING DRAIN • GEOTECH South 7th Street & Beacon Way Southeast CONSULTANTS,INC. Renton, Washington �_ �— Job No: Date: Plate: 10 99330 Sept.1999 ' Important Information About Your Engineering Geotechnical Engineering Report Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. The following information is provided to help you manage your risks. Geotechnical Services Are Performed for • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the spe- • project ownership. cific needs of their clients.A geotechnical engineering study con- ducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construc- As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer tion contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geot- of project changes—even minor ones—and request an echnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engi- assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot neering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report because their reports do not consider developments of which without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who pre- they were not informed. pared it. And no one—not even you—should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a A Unique Set of Project-Specific Factors geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project-spe- been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, cific factors when establishing the scope of a study.Typical factors such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural include:the client's goals, objectives, and risk management pref- events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- erences;the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before apply- configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other ing the report to determine if it is still reliable.A minor amount planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates other- Most Geotechnical Findings Are wise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: Professional Opinions • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those • not prepared for the specific site explored, or points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are • completed before important project changes were made. taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sub- geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: surface conditions may differ—sometimes significantly from • the function of the proposed structure, as when those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engi- it's changed from a parking garage to an office neer who developed your report to provide construction obser- building, or from a light industrial plant to a vation is the most effective method of managing the risks asso- refrigerated warehouse, ciated with unanticipated conditions. A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recom conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have suffi ' mendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions cient time to perform additional study.Only then might you be in revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who a position to give contractors the best information available to developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for you,while requiring them to at least share some of the financial the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. construction observation. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than To Misinterpretation other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappoint • - engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower ments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce such risks, geot- that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with echnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory appropriate members of the design team after submitting the provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations", report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review perti- many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engi- nent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. neers responsibilities begin and end,to help others recognize Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering their own- responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by respond fully and frankly. providing construction observation. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs geoenvironmental study differ significantly from those used to based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a engineering report does not usually relate any geoenvironmen- ' geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for tal findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photo- likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regu- graphic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize lated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental information, ask your geotechnical Give Contractors a Complete consultant for risk management guidance. Do not rely on an Report and Guidance environmental report prepared for someone else. Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface condi Rely on Your Geotechnical Engineer for tions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help Additional Assistance prevent costly problems,give contractors the complete geotech- Membership in ASFE exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide nical engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written let- array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine ben- ter of transmittal. In that letter,advise contractors that the report efit for everyone involved with a construction project.Confer with was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the your ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information.AS FEPROFESSIONAL FIRMS PRACTICING IN THE GEOSCIENCES 8811 Colesville Road Suite G106 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301-565-2733 Facsimile: 301-589-2017 email: info@asfe.org www.asfe.org Copyright 1998 by ASFE,Inc.Unless ASFE grants written permission to do so,duplication of this document by any means whatsoever is expressly prohibited. Re-use of the wording in this document,in whole or in part,also is expressly prohibited,and may be done only with the express permission of ASFE or for purposes of review or scholarly research. IIGER06983.5M ----- 33us• , E ' ' ,....-------,,• z-, .•••4" 'ci) , Ce..44 .)1....,/e.,..L.,620....../• , co 2 2 c c u ffer.57 i itill i in: i ii i Hi , . ,.. , . . :, . .3 :ii I ' i li .11 I I iltill-li,11,1-1,1,1-1-1,-111-1 /7 /4✓ RECEIVED �;,_ ese-ex_ yfc 57 F E 6 2 3 2000 cg -e__ — MAYORS OFFICE re-c-) a-Z-6u) K2)_ tit O t-0 s �a L� - 7-%4-- -i - ,-le,x-/- '77/L-C ,- *L. TeLe:;4 ,; 'e_:.,,, .,.6.6.-et-e-e-ed., .,Z,__ Ce.te ,- -) a_, ' Z6A-- 01(e_e_e, T:7(A -6-- ,0_6(<3_, - 71- -e--ril-e-L-4- 4,7 ce:;-/Le-e_) Y-&z-J . � - J i�I -<- J_, c_e4i-e64 -ege, 2A,4/-e_) ,,d- :7- : .,6 az,t, _ _. _,,e_f,,,a p_ . . L tz 77-eL- Z-' ) - ' '-€-7 64- i '.- 7'z eje)-- `' l/ ✓ l defGYM .a7. 1 / . LJ .-ems EIL-e:i s hZ -& 1 , /4-Z-. ,/'OP V-A- figl ,dzi,, C'A'. `a• , '14'4 /L,-,. -64/('- `)-, ,A ' V .S4- _.e,—,eiti ,e-e -zeoL-4- iii-- a-- - -e- /-- PI-1/-e-t-e- z.. ../ era f , A-ca `- .1--(--4 - j aA-c- - ,-6tAa-e-e _ -ee . . d---e-d-w-e .6Ld_) r__) f -4 L �.c - jlee J -emu; -�" V- IJ ,c,//&z,4z,e , -.4 4- -e/<t_) . a -e,L) A--e-/ # - a_ ,, e_z) ,ei . -ee:E-c,7,D a)-( ,i-ei..,,r) 0 ---- ,c ,‘,.--JA._ �,1 .�. C61Z:� .;�� o`er, o✓s b.1^ ti - • .•-t_ USA , / y�' (% ) �J �-� IO FEB •�, - . C(J(J / , Chinese Hibis m rn 1 ' I c._ V, (A.,1,,, C-A",yi.,;,:±s ., 1 . oc-s^ s;,.A-1-, Y L'` • 4 CITY OF RENTON krAiroiv; Fiter February 18, 2000 FEB 2 2 2000 o p f,„, _I � co t9 f CLERKS OFFICE RECEIVED r Q`2 018/: .- r To Whom It May Concern: Recently, it has come to my attention that the "Bennett Homes Construction Company" has plans of trampling up the narrow two-lane road of Renton hill with bulldozers, tractors, cement trucks etc. This company would like to take 10 acres of established forest(the only remaining natural habitat in the City of Renton) which currently supports a variety of wildlife and vegetation and turn it into 60 new homes. Let there be no misunderstanding, I am writing this letter on behalf of my family and the preservation of the integrity of the neighborhood. With special attention to the wildlife and vegetation that speak for themselves, but in a language which does not support the bottom line...money. An example, the other day I was driving up the hill and was taken aback by a full-grown deer majestically standing at the top of the hill. Though it would be a hassle I could move my family to another place if the Bennett Homes Construction Company gets their way...it won't be so easy for the deer to relocate. Does Bennett Homes have a contingency plan for the forest and wildlife it is wiping out? My husband and I recently purchased a home on the Renton Hill and will be moving in to this community on April 01, 2000. We have lived in the Queen Anne neighborhood for the last few years and have enjoyed living iri the city. During our search for a home we looked at many neighborhoods in Seattle, but decided on Renton Hill because of its charm, nearby forest and park with the additional bonus of an older more tight knit community than a newer development. Unfortunately, adding 60 new homes would not continue to support the aforementioned factors which were the rationale behind our purchase...the traffic up that hill alone will be a nightmare. The reality is...the makeup of the neighborhood celebrates a diverse mix of affluence, education,passion and most important of all we are united together against this proposition. I am not naive...this is about money, not the protection of wildlife and the natural habitat....our neighborhood will not sit idle, but will fight every step of the way. Re ards, Carolyn Ossorio '1. � / .,.,.,,, -. ,, ids,:';f:. February 21, 2000 CITY OF RENTON Renton City Council FEB 2 4 2000 1055 South Grady Way RECEIVED Renton, WA 98055 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear Council Member: In community after community, rampant growth is swallowing up open spaces and wildlife habitat at an alarming rate. From one acre wetlands to entire eco-systems, the places appreciated for their beauty and recreational benefits are at risk. This puts tremendous pressure on once common wildlife, from deer to a host of migratory birds. The Bennett Home development project near Philip Arnold Park is one such site. Nearly every day a deer,raccoon, opossum, and the occasional coyote, make an appearance in some Renton Hill resident's backyard. Why-because much of their habitat has been destroyed through over development. The last refuge for this precious animals is the Bennett Homes site. Communities nation wide are realizing the importance of these wildlife habitats and green belts and are taking steps to save fragile habitats in the path of development. Several federally funded programs are available to help cities and small residential communities save some small areas for natural wildlife. Some of these include the Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program(WHIP) and the Natural Resources Conservation Foundation's Community Wildlife Habitat program. Each of these programs provides funding, resources and technical assistance to communities interested in preserving wildlife and their habitat. The City of Renton and the Renton School District could join the ranks of other progressive cities and really show they are "ahead of the curve" by taking this tremendous step. Preserving the Bennett Homes site will not only provide a much needed habitat for wildlife but will increase recreational opportunities and educational opportunities city-wide. Additionally, over development of this site will increase traffic in a neighborhood already plagued with a lack of available parking and poor road structure. The majority of the roads and intersections are uncontrolled with no signage, no crosswalks and limited sight distance. On many of the streets, Renton Avenue for example, residential parking limits street traffic to one way due to the roads being too narrow and obstructed with parked cars and other recreational vehicles. This congestion will only increase with the development of this site. Please consider these issues when making your decision on the outcome of this issue and look beyond the short term financial gain of the City to the long range implications this could have on the surrounding community, its wildlife and the quality of like in the Renton area. Sincerely, Dorlene Bressan 901 High Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 • . .... .--,. -- . .. • ,e<"‘1--E-"iN\ - • - -,----. --- I 1 . Dorlene Dresan 1 !601.High Ave:S. I (rti P M ,40 '1 61 Renton,WA 9055-391.5 i E5 1 •z2 7 '',... ..,.,..„...,...-0-a--...--,==.---• 741%,---- --""c• - : , 1 , ' [ Renton City Council . , 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 . . . • r seicaVs-zszs iht iltilitilitiltilililitliliiillililillinititilliiiiiiiiiiillil . • . . . • . ' • . . -,... • February 19, 2000 CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 3 2000 To: Renton CityCouncil RECEIVED an,CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Bennett Homes Project Across From Philip Arnold Park We are writing with concern over the proposed Bennett Homes project across from Philip Arnold Park. As 12-year residents of Renton Hill,we are very opposed to the project, especially the number of homes and the proposed flow of traffic through Renton Hill. Living on Renton Avenue S. we are very concerned about the potential increased traffic from the 70 homes. As a minimum 560 more cars could pass by our home on Renton Ave. S. each day. Renton Ave. S. and Cedar Ave. S. are essentially one-lane roads due to the street parking allowed and the yielding to uphill traffic. Traffic on 7th St. and Renton Ave. S. is of great concern to us due to the lack of stop signs at the cross streets on 7th, lack of cross walks, the uphill yielding on Renton Ave. and the poor visibility approaching the steep grades. Safety is a huge concern to those living here. We know of one fatality on Renton Ave. due to the telephone poles being so close to the street. Increased traffic.will increase the safety risk to all residents in this neighborhood. As for the school children on he hill,they are forced to walk up the hill to catch the school bus at Philip Arnold Park. More traffic could endanger the lives of these children. If this project is approved,the traffic caused by construction vehicles will also increase the risk to our families by limiting the emergency access to current residents,which is unacceptable. We would much rather see this property remain as is, or be improved by the City of Renton Parks Department. If it must be developed, then the flow of traffic must be diverted to Puget Drive rather than Renton Hill. In addition, it is essential to our neighborhood that the road remained closed to thru traffic from Puget Drive. We urge you to defeat the development of this land as it is currently proposed. Sin rely, f . Douglas Brandt Dena Brandt `..,, ` 610 Renton Ave. S. 610 Renton Ave. S. i< " Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 ,,,, :, (425)271-2142 (425)271-2142 -,; ,�) .. `w' -- - - Tor The 5randt Family i.0 LE 4 `.''''""`.._..,�,�'�--'1 __us -- 61O Renton Ave.S. 4 q •` _-�F Renton,WA 98O55 P;• � "- __ �, �T— dam_ CITY OF RENTON 1 i r: 74,:::;,,- I 0:t 41 0_() c j,,„ 3 1L vl C1 ) FE B 2 3 2000 e CITY CORK S OFFICE ct , 0 5 So Ix`'k Gra. Gal pQ`i- „oil 98-655 !! } } £ i£ ii } tt ff gg! i --- - - -- s.5� v'�k-�'�:..-42 li£3££i,il£,,£i££':ib5l £11£££1£i££13£££.£.£i£f:£I£P£££Ii: p + S February 18, 2000 CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 4 2000 Renton City Council City of Renton RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 I am writing this letter to express my concern over the 10 acres of land on Renton Hill that was formerly owned by the Renton School District. It is my understanding that the property has been purchased by Bennett Homes with the intent of putting 60 homes on that 10 acres. I am very concerned that the addition of 60 homes to the Renton Hill area will cause numerous problems such as: 1) damage to the existing streets by construction trucks; 2) traffic increase on and off the hill and after the construction is finished, the additional traffic of delivery trucks, garbage trucks, etc. ; 3) the problem of safety, such as limited vision at the top of Renton Avenue. It would be my suggestion that an alternative usage be proposed for this 10 acres. I would like to see that area be used for wild life purposes. Renton Hill already has a problem with the deer population (too many, eating too much) . Perhaps if this area were left undeveloped the deer in our yards would not be such a problem. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, (-A? 61. e.t,t /t_haf,e---c--- Patricia A. Burkhalter i,.;;: ,. 901 Jones Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 (425) 226-8843 \, 901 Jones Ave—So :t L E U, `�" @ `�—' A0fi"12C2.c'i Renton WA 96055 P M 4 FEB ,?coo 4 . Renton City Connell City of Rerton 1 _ 1055 Sruth Grady Way Renton WA 98055 saris-zszs t4s ` CITY OF RENTON February 18, 2000 FEB 2 3 2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 I am writing this letter to express my concern about the 10 acres of land on Renton Hill across from Phillip Arnold Park that has apparently been sold to Bennett Homes. I feel that since this land was owned by the Renton School District that the public should have been notified that it was going to be sold, especially the people on Renton Hill, since we will be affected the most. I feel that there was no consideration given to the community at all. I think with a shortage of natural land and wildlife areas in our city that it was a very poor choice to sell this land to Bennett Homes for home development. Since this land is right across the street from Phillip Arnold Park, it would be an ideal location for a nature park. It could be used for field trips for our schools and also a refuge for deer, birds, and other animals that need this acreage to survive. It also could be left in a controlled natural state where our native trees, shrubs, and vegetation be preserved and used for a learning aid in our schools. With the future development and restoration of the downtown area of Renton going on, I think that a nature park on Renton Hill would be an asset to the city and would fit in perfectly with the growing process. Thank you. John P. Burkhalter 901 Jones Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 =' fRenton resident since 1954 .\- E .® � ,_. ,s_.. - USA *. • 901 iJoes Ave. So.98055 _--PM o __ w _ Renton u �� .m f s I i j Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 SouthGrady 955 Renton - - II• 11tilssislissssitlatithitili1thitill' 1t l►iilit 1iTI 1l I CITY OF RENTON / j--(SLe FEB 2 3 2000 âc RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE -• Ge,( -ge%e c-e6d2,e_64,e. za 6ce/ r • fka-eja cr2,7 /9,e;i-Wee, • • &I-661e- teer st-4 13-4i(-Seeio oki- 40,e_ e -6471 ‘ -t-4/6i-teYe- • xze.,,c7eare„. . 12iff , p-y--eZiee 71,69--alie:,eklze-- ec-‘ / L j ,- .02 .44w,,I ,---0.77.42/_767 , , 7::_, ,72 77 26a',_77,z:p co..74 , d___,,/,„2,;.,,,,,, f� '-g 7a (;?"-, , 4,Z2 /7 '-- -7, 2,'T: ',4?•277 -7 ,41-Z25 -0,- :, OX.,e-e, 7,?..Z,?--121/Y32,A*- 7244W-4%2-- -)--A-0-cp)0 ----.2 /-i'?'67/2e-- <49.Vde2-7-2 -4--a-g2' el--- <, -7.-2 -k(22--ef--, 2 — IV d'27j-- -- /1--.A '4'2---, s° I�� 2 z<4., L. i '2.-72-271-e9) /"X-o? --- -, -----D-9-3-- -7, 9--- ,C.W- ' - V.,:9--0)1 02-A,, ;4-- -422"-- h---o--, --7,-2-, ,0--)----rvao 677i-- -02, ,2--/-z32 312-i-7-a-ia4-- -, ,,,,4 ,--,2-, „ , , --A-.-2-- --, "--P , -„_;,,- . , n-31,27 --z,Hi___vo 1-iwpi, -) -7 vo--- .)---)- ,-,,,-) A---d-g-i-, --," , g3-27- -/z #.-,,ir>77 ---; - 2 732 ---?2-.2,1, 02y ' /r2,77___-1-a r/--1 ne p2,2,?,2„A/, vS9----61 4-2,t- 1,1_,( 'L40'.-7"2%'0-7,/ �.�� - aim ,� �-'72Gr p 1 � -0- -) m��?' `� Cr) `may " ' /I mow , ,21 ,-d-� ' ' )--ylKo h-Q C'Y , , %. C7Nr:1;A NT :Thr1N-6--, ‘")* Of- v' --' c)) 0 i Th,4 -1--1, -117'j!\On 1 /'C) ev'D __3,d_Q_ Thcvn, , 1 -011 , 1,,,_) i___ _ _,__, )2,1,, t -Nvc- \ `FrT13_, Ylo I'L4) u i 17 tO y '" (--zspr - a j ,,, ,, ,,, --11_, ,,i__ 1--), „c„-, Th--,-- i )) c-\, ,k. j ,--4,,Q ro 91k,Ths \P-ei- 7777-Thr ° c4) r9--Q r---e,_.i.L„Al,z „A_...-v _ --vx-zrry- , ----4-4zicw7- , --:÷11, --reA ( ., ----• II- ',--k --n-t) - 5-4 ‘15r IlTh-:11Z'5 - 1c-( 4-Al --o'Ll- g ,. 6 ,_.2_-z_ / — 9 --z- z -__S-zb \ ?r , 1-- '-'9?\ _t, , \A 4L, ) __ o?. /,y?-) JiQII, 5-546 C() - / Acm 'r178/v21'b. , L 1 )i -.. -3- 4 "'D it7D) -)17vile ,.'64)-4% ' , Dyz � - � ' � � ' � � ^ \/Uv11syy\1u/III 1`!n/III/I'll)III if; l\1vp11I 21 ~ ' - - , - - � � .... ... .. . __ - ... .. ..- . Barbara Lux / ‘kr....7 -61-- 1412 S. 9th St. :, t,nii!is.;:-_),,,,..., ,-...:-i-:,•; k:,,.,:..-..,_,,.... • . ..:-...ify Renton,WA 9805 -.,.-:4. ‘i;';':..A'3`,:.•!..-.9'::.1 f.',.,z.,a LI bi..,61.0.1. .......,,,.,, s - :A ,, --•• ; ii 67)/8, A 0 c< c_ 7. WY OF RENTON . e4.1.,,„1„..-17• ___, FEB 1 3 2000 2.3 RECEIVED OITY CLERK'S OFFICE * . ,/".Z....12_r;' -7, -71., - r —.-. ._c._ .,---,.---1--;',.:-!..".i-.:;?7,--- _...4-__./1.-i--__, ._.--(:._ --....:.".' ,_,,,,-;••2-f,...'LL..„: 1...-6"---:,*,...,,-",.7 •') .;Y ' -,-- .2-...,;-?::2;;!/ •-•7- ._.,•{---;%C.,,...: .1e-j-,:t---<'.:::-.f..-- Li-/... c.... --;',.i..-,,--t..e:..L 1 " i 77. ) t- / (I -i • /•••)"' . , / i '; /-/;/./../'•'/:-.2 __'..':G:-.":-1 x",..'ei--e.,=".1,---• ..""-:.:i-;'.=/ J -Z c - 7 ,,..-_-../_- ..-‘1--a--.-.-_-• e...i....4',„e:c."%e,4'-.-::: --,._...: .:.- (..--6. :-.6-!/-.1 (---2-; .r7 ,-2 sf: :..,... .., "-J.., %._:.„(1,,7 L.;.,-„,-....--,,,.. /,,,..-.,- ---,,, • . ,...‹._.„- , / , .. .,../.2-2,-i-t/iy 4'7-3-7-iw-..,...•_"/ ,r7;A_.,,7 ; .;5"- ! ai //1,-..,, . ..-x',:.:-..ia--(•--/"*:-- "'---;-,-..,-,-.-' < e-/-* / ..,,,; '---- - / ( , •/..,. ,. ‘''.v.-:.-- •.,;..„0:--::_,,:.':___._ .,:i---_-). L,„4„, -, 7.,2,..-...e.)-76:-.-(--:L.- _... <. _ (C-!-%;-L...147/::-1--- i'Li-:,,L• ...._. _. , ,„.. ...," .4 --' I / I, ,...._../ r- /,-- - _...<—e.,e„,../.•.,t(.. .....-.(7><.._. "..w...A_„,-i7-1:,-. e....?f,_,L7_:., . ...7Z,-t77-- ,,f--v-e--7- - . . n_12',....,, .) (_.,..c.:,...„,...., ....5 r_jtL- ,,;•(////Cr./ '_-•r-..,:-(---- /I .. .2/ ;/. • /1 1 ., .....4 Al •, :7 _ .,:,,,/ 1/_):::• • ' ,,t....!... ,---,:,L, ,,d-.2...e...z_f-t;.7..--7. 1,,>;:(_/" i.,'",z/ i ,•,../;, ,/ , ,7,2.- ! "". •e";)<--' 1,6= /../1--c--- )1.,:-..-e../.-(..-:.1 . 1-7 7 c-ti.,-(., ,-; tZ 7 -17- c--'71.. 1-(_i-_.tf--- .. -7.0-7." - . f. • 4 , rT / _ _._ ',....,_,..,--/:t_:, _•'.. 1.1/'z t ../...%,11 „../)...e!,..1„--- - e....-c„,e :..„ft, (-/(2,(,?• 5_A..(2.. , Jr—, 4:4 2..4 ,,,_,,.../_..- 6-6:4,i ,4x(..4r7(77,71-' . - ,-.) t./2,4,..0 is._..,,2,•,--, 4. a_-7‘.2.,,'. .0 i ../,1_--1,,1„4,44_141',I---a;_. . , -/-1_ ,-e!..6, , lz.,. -• •.1 • •.II 7f) ---t--7- / P..i..,",' / ,..' i_.,/ ..e, ,1' ' 4 / x% C. .....) -T- G (`--- ,......47,-,(e. ...1....ee...-k_e_. 6//,,,c-f-. /cc:49,;_.,,, _, 7 771--/ ./ - ,../.., a . -., ..,4 ir / / j ..1 1 /72.,.e...a.,,,,,!? b,-.„- c-A.,,....-r. „:4„,....e_, (..>74,c2,-2,,,,,7e, a... ci- c1(.24•2.7(2,z...e 1.-.:,(•. . ...._. _. . _. _/JO licx--7:-___ --/_ __4,e g7/.7)!.-.. E-iii•-•.ic%:2 6i.i/// 4-e et- I . . - r 4. /)/)z 1 • "" ..'? „ —, --7..e/2 ,a e2e....,:2 .,)/.7,.zz_i___7 ;4a67„).(_a -- / C 4-o o,--,-/: _ 2 ) . 2" ..i• /- , ---2k, - --',----'•9-9 --1 - o-z_(' t.--g.--,),7--d--y9 •----)-2-7??r ,. 9,-i-? ; na ---ta_api.--)1j2 g rt,... -,-- - vi,----- . 1 , --.--_),7-z, wir3.-2 -?__1.,t, ,--)--;(-2 - 0 --;.; ,-- ce-ez--,-e- r 0 — —4- / p 7-- / (-1r,-?..,2--0; . 71,47 0-7/-7-7 -9 LD-)--, 1 ---i-44,---(7( --41-,,y•-.7;1,(i1.--• ee ' --7 --- • 6) (")--), 1-1-n11 r?1::2. J . .:•/ -:-/•-•:2174) be4 -2:-" 4.). -72?-22 eq.(--) /e ?-) -9:f c/.-' 7-71---,'/ 5.72/ . _ ( .,- / t I ;--.,) 2,• i--- -- 2,- - - f/ / ) 2'42 _ i4/ 5zoz 77,..., Lx_c„,--,--ex .,A • 7:---•_., ,, -- -11A ' - -/- 4 27) -:-7-,- :7 2-2--v-,"• ---_-.---1!,• / / , / la 72727 1 / 7 2 9 7--G---i--7-7-2-.7 1;,.---,7-7,-i -:.i-//1,---r—•-7.,?-/ 9i--;-2/- - -- V , . • I 1 Tr lr—) . 722 .--.:47:'--.7'../X7 ,------a./,-1 -•i-1-/Iii----:2-22" C e.•-e,-, -?-7: - a-7,- ---- -1/4.- -_-e,---- ---- •1"-- - - — - --— / -7- - —-\---.--- • -- 4-s.-...--e---,j--1.7- -/-1,....--t-," -----14---ri L--I 2-1)2 / --irr;' --?2j.--/-7 ---).:7,---ile---F-X; 1.[.¢-7 i."--\ ''' •-):7;rn-(- . .•••;').{-,-'7;9 7 Y-- r 1 2:7--7 7---7.7: -71,-/v. --7-72-27-D . -.-,,--cay '(--- -3- 77. • -t.- I 1 D . .:) e ---)/.. --;,)-- . /, 1 .,- e I/ i /".;?? . ----.-;'—', .:—) 777( —— — . Zt I2 ) 7UZ.9 -7; c-,--1-/-7 " -" -: 76-j-- -7/-?-7-‘ (P--; -- / • '4- '--,2-0" :, 717,/,>---;<-/ ,,a-X..„---.) .---y---;-2-7 7 (/ /2- - '7)7,-2 7.47 7---'•-•!--sit•42--L--‘7_f! I Irl,f.--ir 1.7-7 • II! j / ---3;.-vu-v- -i) - 7y,"---vfxr2 Li--,-' ----)'?,?-73 ,)L-7," ,k ---71 -77N- fr' ) --'.---11- . C 't-•::;(7'1-7 -12 "7- / • „ . 7) / r. ---- .,:_a _z-,-;,-___,:-e---x_r. i.),-7(2.11., - .:-..•-t./ ,,0-2 -- „7-7.-,)--r; / ,/,-.7-c,v ....,-2-, - 1- .- • ,7,7 — y''' ' •'/.r: / :---7,77."—•*''7' iir:itl'''. C.---?".:—/-:1(73/,../.--' (-7-•/..2: ‘r-v --4-7-er://7,-2,1,7. ._,-_,......,:),/2 i v/7, .7 ... :F,- -1 (--,19-2,/ ----,i.f..-z-2-7) ,7/./i*---7 ..-,t"...0 . - ---}-7--.)--2--‘_ (----'-- :------.:--)/-7 _-;--/f .•, / '_' , 7-- ,.• 7,,, • . ----)4...--7-,3y--0-,,--- :::----;-,-v / ./7fr-, -,.../:;?A/ z.......7-2:-1 /(:•:,...0..?„2.-.? / ..___-•-z____ ,/-) ---) 7, ., ,...v .-------"2-2V-v-7---, ..., t) .i.,,--', ,,/ --r -,../ c ., /„-----‘, .. - ---:21 Z._s2--/->2 ;"T•)'''• i-- • -1) . ./- ,. - r — '..--)-----1.%/: ,,i ;/ v ....-- (.----,.!•-c---1"/-i2.-0-1,1774% , -.)/_../.„( r/ / r.dy..'-:-.7 :' -F.,A/4'7, A.'-.--d:i ---3-•,,--'-;1--,2-2--- --/9 2? --/,_4"------' Ty- fi .,. / (2 ,,-..--;.2-. / ,,:2-7 •-,..- :,:..-,y- / ://?..2 2-? ,--..:-.7 0 (2.... cz5,-- . :...._ • , .4" • / 6,.474 - C!..) (7.; fY/1-(4•_-( . ) • / - - _ __ • • • J -- . - �', Barbara•Lux. . i. .. "`, .1 1412S. 9thSt. 4. <=� ,.E . Renton,WA 9805 h� . . .. . v. ryr co', .1 J 1 ,/,--X_--77"-K___>• • 7 a ( - ih..,),(.7-- %Dsj '-'•,-- vyv 7,.. , _s.a,t"„)`:':ss/7„7,:"r,�-.., hilni. i}1l11iini.tudi1Si121}in111hlibinhillinri CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 3 2000 Rich and Cindy Yarbrough RECEIVED 338 Renton Ave. S. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton, WA 98055 Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way Renton WA 98055 February 21, 2000 Dear Renton City Council, As you know, the Bennet Homes Developers are trying to purchase and develop the land on Renton Hill just across from Philip Arnold Park. Bennet Homes is planning to build approximately 70 homes. I understand that the land is owned by the Renton School District. The main thoroughfare to get to Renton Hill is the street Renton Ave S. Currently this street is very busy with traffic and is only a one-lane road where there is parking on the east side of the street. Down hill traffic has to continually pull over to let the uphill traffic through. Building 70 more homes at the top of Renton Hill will exponentially cause much more traffic and safety problems. With all the major freeway traffic problems that everyone must contend with every day, it would be nice not to have to contend with additional traffic problems and volumes in our own neighborhood. Also, We think that building more homes instead of more Natural Park like areas is the last thing any city really needs. There is constant development in Renton, where all trees are cut down and apartments, condos,houses and strip malls are being built. Look at SE 128th St. (Cemetery Hill road) in the Renton Highlands in the last year. Currently there is massive development going on there. It is time to really look at what is happening to our city. There must be a better solution to all this development. Yes, there needs to be some development but probably not as much as there is now. We were wondering if there is a better solution to the Renton Hill property project. These are alternatives we have thought of for use of the property: 1. Perhaps the Renton School District could donate the land to the City of Renton and the City could make a nature park or bird sanctuary out of it. This type of solution could benefit so many Renton residents rather than just putting more money into the pockets of a developer. The park area would provide a teaching environment for children, a place for school field trips to be taken, for family nature walks, and would help the environment and beauty of Renton. fr 2. Consider the residents of Renton Hill purchasing the land and donating it to the City as"open space". Perhaps the City of Renton could create a separate tax district and the Renton Hill residents would have to vote to tax themselves over the next 30 years to pay for the land. 3. Sell the property to 2 or 3 parties that would only build single homes giving them estate sized property. This would increase the value of all Renton Hill. 4. Only allow Bennet Homes or any other builder to build 30 homes on the property giving approximately 1/3 acre lots to each home site. At least this would cut down some on the additional traffic problems and would leave more open space between the homes rather than cramming the houses so close together like some many other new neighborhoods in Renton. Please consider this carefully as you decide whether to grant Bennet Homes a building permit and a go ahead to purchase the property. It is time to put the environment and quality of living in Renton above the buck. Thank you, 0/1 Rt :5 Rich and 4dy Yarbrou Cindy Yarbrough Th 'I R IIV:Zk' ' ' USA 338 Re111,011 Me.S. WOW SA *7k --=_ 32 t Rnton,WA 98055-3016 --- i v 1 --- — 1111.0_, Aii. N.8. 4-/ P M o ----- z low NAN, .-4 ..- zz r E E! 2000 ..------ am. COV-4A Ci 1 P&V-AVY cib cti-In cyc -- _,t,,,Avv- 1056 WIN GEr065 11:1,„ „-•,..„,„,,,i,„.,„:„:, • • . " • ..• , CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 3 2000 February 19, 2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE Jesse Tanner, Mayor . Renton City Council City of Renton City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 Renton, WA. 98055 Over the next few days you will be receiving several letters from Renton Hill residents. We are requesting your help and cooperation with-the Renton School District to see if we can find a way that the property the District is selling (across from Philip Arnold Park) can be used to enhance rather than destroy one of Renton's oldest neighborhoods. Our roads are now past capacity and the magnitude of the project proposed will gridlock Renton Avenue South and create an insurmountable safety issue. We would have to request a great deal of traffic control items at the Cities expense. (Cross walks at every corner and in areas where there are no corners, yield or stop signs at every corner, speed limit signs, Police patrols for traffic control, traffic light changes as far as length of time per cycle on Mill Ave. So. and So. 4th Ave., left turn must yield for northbound traffic on Mill at Houser Way, more pedestrian controls at the entrance to the former brick yard area and clarification of this properties usage—park/river trail or construction/dredging storage, more yield to up hill traffic signs, three sight distant signs where appropriate and grade signs on Renton Ave. So.) I have explained to the Renton Hill Residents that the City of Renton is not officially on record to address this development. We are looking ahead and if this project is filed want to be on record with all of our concerns. Thank you, Ruth Larson, President Renton Hill Community Association • Cc: Dr. Dolores Gibbons, Superintendent Renton School Board Renton School District 403 Renton School District 403 . February 19, 2000 Dr. Dolores Gibbons, Superintendent Renton School Board Renton School District 403 Renton School District 403 300 S.W. 7th Street 300 S.W. 7th Street Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 I am writing in regard to the proposed development of the Renton School District property located adjacent to Phillip Arnold Park, on Renton Hill. Nineteen years ago I was elected as the President of the Renton Hill Community Association. Each time rumors of the sale of this property were made I called the Renton School District and ask if this land was being offered for sale. The District would tell me the property was not for sale and I would ask to be contacted if the property was ever offered and leave my number. I was assured I would be notified. At least thirty calls were made over the last nineteen years and now that property has been sold and because of the lack of communication the neighborhood I have lived in since 1963 is in jeopardy. The proposed usage of this property would add sixty homes to the top of Renton Hill and completely gridlock our neighborhood. The formula now used by The City of Renton is: 9.55 car trips per day for each single-family home. This adds up to 573 trips that will all use Renton Avenue South. There are already 208 plus homes now using this street as well as all traffic using Phillip Arnold Park. Renton Avenue South has just twenty-three feet of driving pavement and parking is allowed on the East side of the street. The street is posted "Down Hill Traffic Must Yield"; it has been deemed unsafe for school bus traffic because of grade and has two "site distant" areas. I would like the following questions answered: Why was my request for contact not honored? Why was the neighborhood not considered when this property was offered (recommendations and restrictions can be placed on property for sale)? Where will the money received be spent? Will the taxpayers of the Renton School get their property taxes lowered? Will taxes be lowered with the sale of Henry Ford School and its property? Why did the School District not propose a usage of this property that would benefit the district, the neighborhood and the City of Renton? . Proposed usage: Bird and wild life sanctuary. A study area for ecological and environmental impacts of seasonal foliage and wildlife including nature trails. We see a lot of publicity regarding the salmon studies the district does with its students, why not broaden that study to include our fast declining outdoors. There are very few places left within the Renton School District that have been undisturbed for more than fifty years. (To my knowledge the only usage of this property in the last fifty plus years has been a sometimes dump for the Renton School District.) Both the Renton School District and the City of Renton have excellent Grant writers. With mutual cooperation funding could and would be found for a District/City area used to educate our children in the ways nature works. I talked to one of my neighbors about this project and when I was done her four year old ask "but where will the deer live?" My reply "I don't know". If this proposal is submitted to the City of Renton for permits, the citizens of Renton Hill will be asking The City of Renton to deny any application that will add to the already overburdened traffic on Renton Avenue South and destroy this natural area. Ruth Larson, President Renton Hill Community Association Cc: Jesse Tanner, Mayor Renton City Council City of Renton City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 71 50,E -- _.- zit P;\1 -;::)) , .. OD 1?eiyr-vN diTy ODo., .,/c... airy o ENr� low Go - � v r,-7 G -,25x 11-34 7 hEiY rv4y LiC..311.J4t.a a.:r` } ]jj jj jj J f j { i [ FF j g ( j J --- - - --- -- - ---- - -' - - - -- } ! ?!}ff�i}j!!!i1?ii!}:Pi!!1 ??Sli�?! }?!?1?;!}i}S?}f}??3}�?� ' . • •1 • ''. . . . . . - . •;,: ___, . _ . • r,c:_l!!Z--:- r'-'7' `.7-1,r,'71;n: !1, '!•1:;t•IR h:\ '..;t- L ' . • CITY OF RENTON f/ . , . FEB 2 2 2000 • • RECEIVED • • . • CITY CLERK'S OFFICE .... -4---6,--e-- --/L----/ --- '72- (a1-24772L,• • ,-- ,----/".:---e-7-7,--: cf_-- I ft ;,,, 4_,,... /,--Z..,„ .,,, z-.___,_,/,,, 7‘4.‘--(--r--- -- -.‘(--/.1"--(--- 7 "C---1-1--a---,"7- / e.i.e----t--P--- r----7':- 7--:Z2:i-vr'?i--!-,:-- , . .----7 - L .-_„,• _ _ . . „.• kre_.."---' . - ,•e:2---d---,---/-- "-- -.-- c._.." d, s .z")---A-ert-t.,_ e2--e<-:-(--- -_-- ..t.P.).21----- ....-(:, ,. 2-- _ yi....z---c-e---— -eke__ 722--- --z...,_. - • -gzei.76.z.r.----_ e---.A.- e---7 „. .-----6_ C---(_/_ ,A.-e/ / -626'e-'6 L-e---er--,-7- ,7 • tke-,;(7;-4_ (-_',,,-._ S__, ,i_ZZ„,,,,,,, ftf.,--1.---4„....,___.,_ ,...5.-„• 6,-,...._,___ ,,,?..„4.._____ < . . ,..e__.-7' ,..,-:_u_ ,t.-e—,---,---ei- --e--,e--- ,e.g-=-7.--, e-- --7,_L_. • , .,..__I-t-, ,--e-f...,(....„../..,/---- ...-7,--/,- ,.:.,...- • •'-,4 _e...___: _.1-4.___:___ __,_,... / fr /7 -," ,,--) :„6....if..4....e...¢..--- ...--i_l. -- .t---p-- ., ,- i ,--;34--%- --z_ ' " 7.7-:: --- - . • ,,, „L.4. ....„...„ /,,___. ,i_t_ . ../.:7„.„..0_1..... ,..., -:".,.._ ..„.___ ,:„.1- / • f- - 0L- e-(--- e•-/4,--X:- /L2- ..) ie„ . • f--- ___ .-7-_?, ., -4 - ,L).„. _ .z.....„„c...._.4 • 14: ,___:_„ .. ,___ e5 ,,,e_t • --e-e---------------r -..16,-;_‘1---7-- .„(_,..... .., ,....„, ; , / ...____ . e.-ze....„,_,...„ --. .. ,---„_-,...,„7..,---„ ,/,....„_,_.,....... ....‘_,- — __e, • ;,-..,..6..,..J__ ,, ---- „ ..„.,,, 0_„__ ,6-:.s..e...?....‹.____- / / / ,.. . (::--------f----./2 ,A 7-7' "—a- .-, . Nr- - L,.. -("1---1 7 --- /e-e-z---f..---Z.,--A-1---,4 —C.-- „Z.'e-:-e---,---eg- -e- --2---47---- --t4., -/ /e-e---e.--, .__ -•: . ,, .,_,‹,. --- , • - _ 2>2 ...:, .....:,;56‹.„6_,. --77 -----7 _.., .Y c ,,,,Z-- - ,/,:-61---44 '"""lte-- .- f .. - --,./.. .---) -2--4Z1,e;t_e__ ,,,,...-e_--L ,42.,.‘, ..1-2 - / Lii,„1_ /_,,j- / . .. ) i' l\ .\ '0 1 1 • ''4\ i)`\ ' :. . . • '\i-) • ' . 1 1 1 . - Q. q. 1 1 \ 1 . .\) ;.. , • -, I \ 1 I 1 . \\\ .;‘\ 11 ) • .0 s 1 kl ,\11 1 ,:o .\ ,% , „.4, \ . .„ • 1 ) 9 .‘ k ' . .-.- y . t 1 1. 1 ' :N'rl \s q- „ .., , , ),., ,, , - , , ,... , , \, . - , sr . (1. \.. IT „,„ ., , ., 3-- . • `. ;N- ..t . . - , . • • • _ i,, . - / 7.1 q T •A Ms. Janet Slapnick 531 Grant Ave. S. .01._E-'4,1\ Renton,WA 98055 ; 19 FEE - 20 00 Ormb- f v lid . • • SHARON HERMAN 711 JONES AVENUE SOUTH RENTON,WA 98055 February 18,2000 Renton City Council City of Renton Cl� F AENTo 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 FEB 2 2 2000 Attn: Renton City Council: C'rY CLERK'S OFFICE I'm writing in concern about the 60 homes that are proposed to be built across from Phillip Arnold Park. Other than the concern of the traffic problems that will occur,I would like to speak about the personal side of what this property means and what it has to offer. I have been a resident of Old Renton Hill for 32 years. My children played in the pit area(that's what we have called it for years)while they grew up. They walked the trails,picked wild flowers,hunted for snakes,made forts, and picked wild blackberries. Now,my grandchildren come to visit and I take them to the pit area often. We take bread crumbs for the ants,put carrots at the rabbit holes and throw nuts for the squirrels. We walk the trails and go on treasure hunts. They truly enjoy seeing the deer come out and walk in the park. My father who is 83 years old,comes to visit each summer from California and his greatest joy is to pick wild berries for a homemade pie. Please consider the fact that families being able to make memories together in the quiet space across from the park is priceless. Together,let's work hard to preserve this small portion of land that so many have enjoyed in their own special way. It's getting harder and harder to find a quiet space to share peaceful times together and do fun things. Let's not let all the future family times and memories that are yet to be made,be taken away. It would be a compliment to the city of Renton to enhance this area for generations to come. At the cliffs edge, people could drive up to see a sweeping view of Renton,the Space Needle and all the surrounding areas. From a high point,it's spectacular. This would be a nice attraction to the City of Renton. I don't know if there is any such attraction in our city. It would be a terrible loss for our neighborhood and the City of Renton to have this taken away for a monetary advancement. Remember,when it's gone,it will be gone forever. Thank-you, ‘24--4.1W,Y1 Sharon Herman Renton Hill Resident 1 F:ai . r 2,� . • Ms.Sharon Herman `'1 M � � 711 Jones Ave.S "' Renton, WA 98055 "'• • r�� I . / OSS' wa`�- V/a 9T1O5 ' S'PJ'C..?=b'- -V;1.'.'e2.v/.'rr 1I3144�tt111itAlSZt�!l�l�ilFl�S:I�I�Ii�I441�E tS�l�li�Sjil4lFtf • • • 17:1 r .. ms � .� _� E , „ �Rentgn;WA198055 4, �-" _ ------.,-_--... 1 '' rfe ,•,, s \ r a CS- i. G C ( i > _ . „a,,,r�w v , • • R-Q_PrA,,t_.0-y-t__ ....iiet_e,0---ttint..1.1 I055 „co.A.,c1-11. R.,,,,,, ..„„,,,,_ burl- . q glosis, . . , , , „ , 'sedC„ilsr...,.:.-7.:?,, Ii1I 1Iltl'f17i3i11thilliiiith.„f1T3179't23m3flil113ii,41l7 • • throughout the summer months that do not appear in the traffic count during the colder months. Also add the impact of 15-20 homes to account for those currently under construction and the sites that are likely to be developed within the next few years.We then will have an appropriate Traffic Study from which to base more informed opinions. ThankYou,/r w al Dan Land Liz Hemenwa) 1712 SE 7th Court Renton,WA 98055-3943 (425) 271-2969 danhemenway@worldnet.att.net 02/19/00 Dan and Liz Hemenway Page 2 of 2 Renton City Council CITY OF RENTONFEB 2 2 2000 City of Renton RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton,WA. 98055 Dear Council Members, We are writing in regards to the proposed Bennett Homes development on Renton Hill to the immediate east of Philip Arnold park. We understand sometime back the zoning for this parcel was up-zoned to allow as many as eight homes to the acre. Clearly this was allowed without a careful review of the impact on the surrounding area as it is totally out of character with any of the neighborhoods around it. If possible, we would like to have a review of the appropriateness of this change. About half that—four homes to the acre—is more appropriate to the situation. As you likely know, access to Renton Hill is over two adjacent overpasses crossing I- 405. Once across the freeway,Renton Avenue South and Cedar Avenue South are the two Mainstreets,that,serve Renton Hill. Renton Avenue is the wider and steeper of the two with parking on one side and a poor sight-line near the top. It has been widened until the curbs are literally inches from the power poles. Cedar Avenue is quite narrow with parking on both sides and functions more as.a quiet dead-end street where kids play. Connecting the two at the top of the hill is South 7th street,which is so steep it likely would not be allowed to be built under today's standards. Crossing the top of Renton Hill for access to the proposed Bennett development is South 7th Street. It has sidewalks on some blocks, deep ditches on some blocks, and several intersections without so much as a Yield or Stop sign. Unless Bennett homes is prepared to underground the overhead wires, regrade and widen Renton Avenue South, and bring South 7th Avenue up to proper standards with curbs, sidewalks, and signage,there simply is not the street infrastructure to support near the traffic 60 to 80 additional homes would incur. With some improvements and good luck,maybe half the proposed number of houses could be accommodated. We understand Bennett Homes counted the cars crossing the overpasses for a few hours and reported the results to the City of Renton as a Traffic Study. This is totally inadequate and Bennett homes,experienced in building homes for over 18 years, knows this is inadequate. To us,it was Bennett Homes calling the City of Renton employees stupid idiots who could be easily fooled. Needless to say,we are deeply disappointed in Bennett Home'•actions. - To.properly count the cars,two counters concurrently counting the traffic near the north stop signs on Cedar Avenue and Renton Avenue are required. Add 75 or so to the number of cars counted to account for activities that occur at Phillip Arnold Park � .,. VI l �Y{J'�'y'1 IMP,,JI` {l.r I r..f Fl c;' 4�X [t,' G�;�y]-7i,' 02/19/00 Dan and Liz Hemenway Page 1 of 2 �"t�l "i lM1 CITY OF AE�1T01 FEB 2 2 20C RECEIVED • February 18,2000 Y CLERK'S OFFICE Renton City Council City of Renton To Whom It May Concern: Property across the street from Philip Arnold Park I believe the impact of building so many houses up.on Old Renton Hill would be a:terrible idea. . The hill, Renton Ave. S can not handle any more traffic. I ar0 stopped a couple of times a week:by • vehicles blocking an area of one of the streets by garbage truck or utility truck: People.having to:yield. to right of way of vehicles coming up the hill would grow•by over a 1:00 vehicles.At 4:00,on.a weekday - now, I might have to pull over_4 times�before I get.down.the;hill. It Will be rush hour on,Renton:Hill.' P ' also do not know where the intersection the Bennett,Homes would go:`There,is'already to many intersections (5) going to the Phillip'Arnold Park entrance. I see people getting confused, at that intersection quite a bit. With spring and summer coming up we Will have all the.baseball games and • private parties at the park. When 'will a'tragedy happen, because people got confused on the intersection, and a little child crosses the street not knowing where to go. - The property should be left as a green belt for the children and nature. We already have an over population of deer and many other animals on the hill where will they go. I would like to see us keep this area for the deer in the area and other wildlife. Most of the people on Renton Hill have had family up here for over 50 years there is a lot of history on this hill. Sincerely, Paula Provin 712 Renton Ave.S Renton,WA 98055 is fy �33USA P.Provin At. 712RentonAve.S �L. l�"'° Renton,WA 98055 ' —_ ^J 4... . ;, . . u ( s. 200 1 ''Qi\r \C-QY\e- Q\IC N-A C3\)\r‘\QX' \ 1 Q-j\--\\ C5-- N(4'aN,r\-\- . . , \ d• -------ysss)...., C3 ff\--k \e- cD N \Q„,... \t")\ qs(-05.-s---. s:• ::: :::: flaluL.1.11.3u1.l..1,l,nll,ulilullini,l,l11a,M,.+Il,l CITY OF RENTON Renton City Council City of Renton FEB 2 2 2000 1055 South Grady Way RECEIVED Renton, WA. 98055 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear, Council Members: I want to express my opposition to the Bennett Homes project that is being proposed for the Renton School District surplus property located on Renton Hill. My home is on Renton Ave So. I have lived at this location for over 30 years and I believe that a project between 60 to 80 homes would cause traffic chaos on Renton Hill. As you are aware Renton Hill is a no outlet neighborhood. Every car coming up the hill must also go back down the hill. The traffic on Renton Ave So. And Cedar Ave So. Would be increased dramatically(60 homes x 2 cars x 3 trips per day=360 cars)that will use these streets everyday. Renton Ave So. is a narrow street with parking on only one side. It was not designed to handle this increased volume of traffic. Cedar Ave So. which has parking on both sides cannot handle current volumes let alone the proposed increased amount of cars. In closing, I would like to see the Renton School District or the City of Renton find a more suitable use of the property that would benefit the city as a whole and not just a builder or a few homeowners to the detriment of many. Let's preserve our open spaces. Cordially, 16z-Zt- \b:;1A-r Patricia Gilroy Homeowner 535 Renton Ave So. Renton, WA. 98055 r.;,. ttttt.,. P. M. Gilroy T �q .►"`�'°^�., 535 Renton Ave.S. P i Renton,WA 98055-3013 1 '+38[a�'tr"s2�t.2 ��t�tt�tt�t��uu�t�+t�t�ttt��tu�t�tt��ttt�t�t�t�tt�t�ttt��t� Jesse Tanner, Mayor Dr. Dolores Gibbons, Sup't City of Renton Renton School District 403 1055 South Grady Way 300 S.W. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Renton City Council Renton School Board City of Renton CITY OF RENTON Renton School District 403 1055 South Grady Way FEB 2 1 2000 300 S.W. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 16 Feb 00 Ladies and Gentlemen; As you near completion of your respective Taj Mahals could you possibly consider giving some attention to the prospect of Bennett Homes' proposal to destroy forever a 10+ acre portion of Renton Hill by building some 60+ houses thereon? We understand they only have an option on the property and that no formal petition for a building permit, etc., has yet been presented to the Council. However, knowing how alert our crack city administration is, I am sure you are unofficially well aware of their intent. It is not an exaggeration to declare their initiative a potential disaster for the stalwart denizens who live high atop beautiful, and relatively peaceful, Renton Hill. No one who knows Renton Hill even casually can be unaware of the traffic disaster its two undersized and over-trafficked streets present and what the impact of another 60+ houses and at least an additional 120 vehicles would have on our fragile links to the western world. To permit additional development up here would be tantamount to abandonment of your responsibility to help maintain our quality of life. I would commend to you the following: The City should use whatever means available to urge the School Board to transfer the land in question to the City. The City could then charge the fine Park Department with developing the land into something of value to all. It is possible the City might have to buy the land from the School District. Raising $2.2 million for such a noble purpose should be no challenge for an administration which was able to conjure $20 million+ out of whole cloth for our grand new City Hall, in arrogant disregard of repeated voter disapproval. Finally, shame on the School Board for seriously considering letting those 10+ acres slip from the public domain, probably under the premise that $2.2 million would make a difference in raising the standards of education in our community. As if 3 months from now anyone would remember where the $2.2 million went. To any who may have read this, thank you. To all, please try to do the right thing in this matter. Bert H. Custer NNW Bert H. Custer E 714 Cedar Ave. So. Renton, WA 9805518 c� P tiq n 1 Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 siho.sy..1s232 • A • - CITY OF RENTON formr‘mr,11F0 FEB 2 1 2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (1- tzt 911- -y ! rJ aA_L_ O- -L . ) 17770- C.A z(L-Q-12 WLJ2_ /2A-012e-- —,et G6-a ALO—' eeitDr? (LeA,e /3C1AJ22 Oldt -kjj /L,4 a ol6 oz.d ,d4-?3/ e- .;_g.4 wrzte4.61 tu A 2 ,Ato 61-7 -r1( 1,e,eLav 6--711.-ex-ii-t 74- --A-C /71/Latr /Lafrt-C-4-2-41 pe-e 016i-ee (?) J1,oirzi - aJA-a-et-ely a ze_At-C_ deL, J.A_4t-eig 0,4 , pt-eAzdt c,& a 4'd 6vz - d_e>itt 4.IA _10 Pr'-(01 :_ o- - - , 1h _ 164 :4$ [ 144 t F 1 1110 )14.0 -111 ‘L‘ r � d H, � d 111 I } iift "111 At'li-4 ill i iliT la A IVIP ' 'N 1 ) 410' -‘ 'N'' 'j . 1k• - . Itql 101 - 14, . \, ' A .11141dii "1 - z1: Iji'sz-4illA r N • - �� Mrs.Nancy Liston t E �, • a.7 ` 4 ` 17703 114th Pl.SE U " Renton,WA 98055-8581 U; P �D �•'�� ,,%� I' FIE3 ----......._...... .4111M1111464.nttet-n- e-e.. tit (---el-e---11--e---e-i- eA......,6f ...„ei le_znh-ri_ /D - ,tee-74-,a_ /14.1_47 01, ka--,±0, : 1 1ii 1! tt 1 Ijij t(1y se ! 0;c.74.G IllJiiin h 111tIililfiIiluuIIii,lI11,111i,,litiJ1'Iillim I11j t CITY OF RENT February 17, 2000 Renton City Council pN City of Renton FEB 2 1 1055 So Grady Way 2000 Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear Council Members: I am writing to you concerning the development of a 10-acre piece of property in my Renton Hill neighborhood located to the north of Philip Arnold park. It has already attracted the attention of Bennett Homes as a possible sight for fifty plus homes! I maintain this acreage has a much better use than more homes, A major consideration is the stress on our infrastruacture in terms of increased use of our neighborhood streets. These extra cars will add a negative impact- especially during the spring, summer and fall sports seasons when Philip Arnold park is heavily used. Another glut of cars would add to the wear and tear on road surfaces, spew out more air pollutants and noise (the freeway through our neighborhood already adds this aplenty), increase congestion at the two exit points on the hill, and make safety concerns for pedestrians, pets, children, and the growing number of bike riders very real. I don't believe we can underestimate the value of this "jewel" in our midst. If it is allowed to be lost forever under homes and paved surfaces, the number of people who benefit will be limited to only those homeowners living there. But another, higher use could be felt by our entire community for years to come if its potential as a green space is realized and acted upon by forward-thinking officials and citizens. With the grant writing expertise employed both by Renton and Renton School District personnel, it should be very possible to find monies to underwrite the cost of turning this area into an urban wildlife and nature preserve. bird sanctuary and ecology and environmental study space; all these are areas of science study by Renton students. This plan allows a minimum of intrusion by humans and a maximum of benefit for already stressed wildlife and people. Such an innovative and aware approach to land use would truly mark Renton as a city "ahead of the curve." I respectfully ask you to consider this proposal as the better use of this precious land. Sincerely CajtCY-L Carol Collins 420 Cedar Ave So Renton, WA 98055 IFCuol R.Collins . L C. tv. 1 420Cede Ave S P M a) >, Renton,WA e S 5-3047 1 �� eiii etrozn/ca is /It W6LV--) 1?„,,,,A, li p q 86-5-5 se,...s.s#. 7:..t II.I,Ii.a.tl...fi.I..iilte.tln,l.l,itt>>�H I�lt.l.Luft,t February 18 , 2000 CITY OF RENTON Renton City Council City of Renton FEB 2 1 2000 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Wa . 98055 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Subject: Bennett Homes Development Renton Hill Dear Council Members : As homeownerG on Renton Hill over 70 years , ::a are opposed to the development applied for by Bennett Homes for the following reasons: 1 . The addition of 100+ cars from another 50-60 homes in this development would create an overcapacity on Renton Avenue South to handle safely. The road is not very wide, there is a severe crown in the center ofCthe road, and as you go up or down there is a blind spot where you cannot see cars coming for a moment. Together- with extra traffic during the summer months from usage of Phillip Arnold Park, would create addition- al hazards. 2 . We feel that this property should be downzoned from R-8 in keeping with the recent addition of River Ridge area which is a nice development. 3 . We feel that the School District should turn this property over to the City of Renton for some other use, such as a park area for hiking, or relaxing, such as the Atboretum area in Seattle, or kept as a green belt. 4 . This property was purchased with taxpayer money, no real estate taxes were paid on it, so we feel it should revert to the City. The sLhools ate supported by taxpayers and their needs will be met without the sale of this property. Yo very ruly, Mar ' o H. Tonda ctor J. [P�Inda 1308 Beacon Way So. Renton, Wa 98055 .p t Mario H.Tonda 1308 Beacon Way So. Renton,WA 98055 3050 33USAp .` L is /fr L( ' . F E b �,a4_ i , A , /6. 6--6-- 4 Al-,-‹5---g--A. 6L) 0/0 v ^-- ----ii= (4)Q, "rithr_itS 4'a, 2. Il,l„t„l,ll,,,,I,t„l�l,,,il,,,J,l„tl„►illtlfltIl 'III7 s- t 4 - 709 High Ave. So. Renton, WA 98055 February 18, 2000 CITY OF RENTON F E B 21 2000 LD`w �J RECEIVED �$�-- 4,4 / 2�af CITY CLERK'S OFFICE As a 45 year resident of Renton Hill , I am requesting that you do everything in your power to negate the building permit of 60+ homes on the property across from Phillip Arnold Park. If the 60+ homes are approved it would destroy the quality of life as we know it. The traffic problems would cause disastrous compli- cations, rife with accidents on the only two streets (So. Seventh and Cedar) accessing the neighborhood at the top of the hill . Two- way traffic on these streets, with parking, as now allowed, will seriously hamper and cause bottlenecks for emergency vehicles -- fire engines, police, Medic I , ambulances -- causing loss of property and life. At present there are no marked crosswalks which can cause accidents for pedestrians and especially for the many school children who use these streets. These are problems already encountered but will be greatly compounded if additional homes in the proposed development are built . Another serious problem is the maintenance and closure of the street work required due to the sinking of the roadway caused by the innumerable mine shafts throughout the area. This has been an ongoing problem over the years, especially on 7th Ave. and with additional vehicles,will only persist indefinitely. This property should be given first option to public usage for projects such as parks, nature trails , natural vegetation study etc. Sincerely, ! 7Rnth Bradley .. amp- . _L . .�"` Renton, s u .�- �.�_. •98055.3917 v' p '' - A,. / o �S-/110/3/1.,ta4", ‘41.4 ALe'Ll'i oqi.,71 , {_) /9 g 0 --c:5- _. ,!k.,-€2.1 Z-0°`-`d s&OS'S4:,27a2. lltl„It,ltfl1 l,l,+ltlt:ill,tel,li,Ili,el,Gfiltef,hr,lltl -At f CITY OF RENTON --0eand FEB 2 1 2000 Q41S14_00 RECEIVED CRV�O OFFI E _ ictAA u�� 42) ___ • i/yx)- Av-e, oAO. Lf2A,f /.1 L)LI (tCef)d) /Q-ANIU _c+ ArGelart5-17\-, „i<t9 )4, t:1-1. 4petox___llA). ekeus= JA4)-yickf4./.61,&1- AleftCrahAn , .. .v I _ _ -______� a__. �rQ- - w ___ _ - - 1a , v oLivot be . . C2)-- ,e4.1,1p :cet_c 1211c,a3A)_12_ IL(ct,o-c nazdzioli WAS4L- cottAfYA4D.a, O w u , t/Oola,00t__.miau____,,W2e_i2Lactd/ifi rJ - 'maD-4__LAJ2 c. -� __�___ 171461L.2. --fig . OtS,L 66/t4IL - a.XLklpf7?-02 _ _ .(09300-1Ce_ -40ffi --VIX---&-r9-02- L6.146k _ 4cLJALa42L__ 0 _ _ :2 1 y i ;A- V2(/2VVV V� D .� 1.►�� S/ _LJJ.0±. AA) 9 �. GOLt , • liOd-6/17177ktirp 1-2w- f 7:?-1Ag c-”DO--)-10 -4--rot Tovr-r2-ru nd . 2 -7 7°J-N-r 70)--vr) 4 -1/tca-0-41 • P-°" ci- l-krfd").a f•r (j 2( :L -D-V) 019ff _JFY31,-A• 07)1 190tr y `70` 01}11I9C-41-4CbratU brn )40` r0i) ( --n/rW-)1Ar Qr. --'n/QV'fnrT __4<yCn VrrY)CY1 n4/01.140IY ( dn °)& .tArrbil 4CrOG6r. © I r„ Cheryl DanzaplA v Z L 706 Renton Ave.S. w f Renton WA 98055 3008 �� P M -�'^" - --� - I8 FEB �?^ r)110 ' ..+tea .:.... • ,k, I C ( ` -1 Ou >�c - � 1 C,TY 64- (2-0-)- 3\(\g-e w e, XcN- cre3 o5 I CITY OF RENTON FEB 2 1 2000 February 17, 2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear Renton Council Members, We are writing to express our concerns over the possible new construction of HillPhillip ArnoldPark. 50-60 new homes on Renton across from Atiiviu 1 uii�. Renton Ave. would be the only access up the hill to the new homes. Renton Avenue is a very busy road already and is frequently blocked by different service vehicles - garbage, cable, etc. That many new houses would only add to the congestion, which also brings up safety issues. Renton Avenue is very steep in places and with cars on either side it is very difficult to see as you're driving down it. It would increase the problem with that many more automobiles using the same road. That vacant land is home to many species of birds and animals. It would be better to make it a natural preserve of some kind There is so little land that is close in that has been left untouched. Isn't it possible for the city to purchase the land and put it to better use than another subdivision that will crowd the already overcrowded access roads on this hill? Please don't issue any building permits without carefully considering the effects on the existing residents of the area. And also please consider the other possible uses for the ten acres of land. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, 7--geq OM/1./e\___ Barry & Pat Conger tAIC J, q r4/ 4r • 1055' Sr $�'�� '�' ''�� '�i'itIi4111'itfiitlll�lll!£��173�}llllltllftltl illf�t�4ff!!!� a.. i ' CITY OF RENTON pp FEB 21 2000 2_ 17K_0 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE - V.0--Nv$Z\;.-VCIOZAL N-ICNAL. CA&_ cak opc• .C\-\\N.1 V-6-r-L• ck•-?-Key-x4 GAG. S. � _ � � .�►.� Wiz �.5 \"\ate V X\\ v nCxNcT �c \4N\erC) 1Te'S\a,\‘f.5:3,Lk:31- 113$--k5l>1 eCNSLS-‘'1•-- ' 'X5Nj-r<3L \•C•••,\,_ Vv`C� V—LN ``ter ,A3 c� r C .)A \ ly-AN (NYNC ' • a — �� Se.c , rec— :),:v_v \Leio.N.,-ms„ _ o • r --h"' ?' j . i 'leildP 4P00 . 1 ,i ' oi411 4 ,J 4 ., , ,,, , Ji.0 1) 64 ,1 j„ i.) : Or' Od,, '-i t j ' iWil , -pJ ) d , , t1 ‘ ('' 4wq ,v), , i .) -) ,,fti ) ) '- - e7s,r,, ,I. ,ot . - 48\l/ d ,(q r '0) I• 0 1 , )) ) .q /sZi ,\/iliirlil ii4 tili 1) ;. - Ad .),,j4L" �-1 I I 1 dir I Ji?" :4 L ".". - ( ; i' . - Vi r i . , ,,L F . :,,i r , . 1. i; 4 : ,,,,, , , r'` f _,E '' ' ' 7 : ' ,,t I r � � ' ,o i ; 1 ,F. r r I / r t ' i 1 W 1 ' V r , r 14- +, , I r 1 • icAP r ►► ' 1"1 . ' t . 6 1,I Fi, i, . i, I P r C E` � r VN1 I ' i - i 1 il , . ; tlf. t .., , r ,.., 1 1 f , , , . • , , 4' ..; . tf .,,,, r j lici If 1°.vo r 11 t 1I i ? i i ! v Ir.-n v .....• -. .. ` - - , •• _04.• *. • - USA I Q a • Cheryl Dania �A L E , - ��,,'�t 2 °Y;. 706 Renton Ave.S. " 9 �"`r"""'. — ,"; Renton WA 98055-3008 u ' PM ►�"-�— . . m 18 FEB 2000 �_ V••• -12.AAT 6W 0C\----( CC,0MCA 1 a,( k.k)c, -( ,-e,� � ��C< - Sc�S�. :_•_ -••_•-•• - Ji,1.,it,iti1t,,,1,i,Fi,i3„ii,,,iFi,ili„tif1il,1„itif,�illi Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 So Grady Way CITY OF RENTON Renton, WA 98055 FEB 2 1 2000 RECEIVED Dear Council Members: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE I am writing about a residential development project planned for a ten acre area near the intersections of 7th Place S., Beacon Way South and Jones Avenue South. The developer is planning a little over 56 homes in this tract. These homes, added to the existing homes on Renton Hill, will put an unusual burden of traffic on Renton Avenue South. Renton Ave. So varies in width from 25' - 11" to 26' - 2" wide and has 210 homes that access this street only. I am sure that this width is under-designed for the proposed traffic loading. (Which would be 2.5 vehicle trips per day times the number homes serving directly onto Renton Ave (210), or 665 daily trips for residences only. This figure does not include the Park). Given this many car-trips per residence per day, plus the seasonal sports- related traffic to Philip Arnold Park for baseball, little league football practice, and softball scheduled for this park, Renton Avenue will become difficult for existing residents to traverse. At the present time there is parking allowed on only one side of the street, but the street is not wide enough for double passing on the remaining pavement. Thus, the signs at the top that say "Yield To Uphill Traffic." My wife and I are asking your help in questioning the viability of this project when it is submitted to the City for review. Based on this data, I hope you agree with us in making Renton Avenue south safe for our children to cross without dodging more cars. There are no street intersections between South 3rd and South 7th, thus pedestrians may feel free to cross at any point. With parking allowed on only one side, visitors to the west side must cross to the east. When Renton Avenue is slow, people tend to go down Cedar Avenue which has parking on both sides. It should be noted that Cedar Ave South varies in width from 26' - 10" to 27 feet wide. This does not allow for two way traffic except at points where there are no vehicles parked. The dimensions for both of these streets are well below the City's Code for collector street widths, which are a minimum of 34 feet. Thus, adding 56 homes and the related 140 additional vehicles per day is not in the best interests of the existing residents on Renton Hill. The developer does not wish to widen Renton Avenue to the legal width for a collector street. We wish to express our concerns to you at this time and propose that the land in question be acquired by the City for Parks use - as a wildlife / natural conservation study area and not be developed. Thank you for your assistance. ill Collins 420 Cedar Ave So Renton 98055 Co11'ns G7 `� 18 FER ~ ills,• ,.,, 000 --� - --It..— — F S C O T i i i /(i I R:1, r 3 e )®� Coate `/ ;. USA 23 u i.iiiiitiiiiiiiiii.t im i L i ii7ii?a iiiii ii:ii:1 1 Renton City Council City of Renton CITY 1055 South Grady Way OF RENTpN Renton, Wa 98055 FEB 2 1 2000 RECEID CITY C ERK S OFFICE I am writing in regards to the Bennett housing development next to Philllip Arnold Park on the Renton hill. (Renton's oldest neighborhood) My wife and two kids are proud sixteen year City of Renton residents and have supported and enjoyed many City of Renton activites. We are extremely concerned about the 56 homes that are perposed to be famed onto the 10 acres of the project. This land currently provides a home to many bird species such as the endangered red tailed hawks, deer coyotes rabbits and other local species. This untouched land should remain in it's natural preseved state. The city park's system should annex this public land. If the land is to be developed no more than one house per acer should be allowed and the land re-zoned one house per acre. The reason being the very unsafe proposed 6 way intersection at the interence to the project. The unsafe intersection at 7th & Renton Ave South (a four way intersection with a three way stop on a steep hill .) The one way access to the Renton hills existing 208 faimlies on Renton Ave South would be over burden and unsafe. Fire police and ambulance axcess would be restricted due to the increased traffic from the new project. This 56 home project should be rejected by the city and other land uses should be considered. My family will move to a new city after 16 happy years in Renton if this project is allowed to proceed as our trust in city officals ,traffic safety & quality of life would be ruined in our Renton hill neighorhood. This proposed project will cause a great financial loss for both us and our neighbors. Sincerely Ah+o,t) DEwa.cl �\1 Barton Bennett 1807 Southeast 7th Court Renton,WA 98055-3954 ZLE IflLUflTflfl 17 'EB � iirQ Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Wa. 98055 3e,o3''y-.12.7B2. s •J- . y February 17, 2000 Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON City of Renton 1055 S Grady Way F E B 2 1 2000 Renton,WA 98055 RECEIVED Dear Councilmembers: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE My wife and I have lived on Renton Hill for the past ten years. We have found it to be a very quiet community where people take walks in the street and enjoy Philip Arnold Park. We live just one block from the park and we can hear the children playing. It is a well-used park especially in the spring and fall. There is a wooded area east of the park where a small herd of deer lives that makes occasional forays into the surrounding gardens. Renton Hill is historic;it is built on top of old coalmines. These mines have been long abandoned,but the original miners and their families who lived and worked here set the nature of the community. More recently a score or more large homes have been built on the hill and integrated gradually into the neighborhood. These additions have begun to put a strain on the traffic through the community. I understand that the Renton School Board has sold the woods to the east of Philip Arnold Park to developers—Bennett Homes. The planned development of about 60 new homes on the property across from Philip Arnold Park causes me great concern in several areas. Street Traffic—Access to Renton Hill is limited to two streets,which pass over the 405 freeway. The hill drops sharply to the freeway and the Cedar River. This cuts off access from the north and northeast. Grant Ave S,which appears on maps to give access from the south,is barricaded and does not go through. There is a road that runs by the electrical substation,which gives access to Philip Arnold Park,but it is also barricaded and only opened when snow or ice makes Renton Ave S inaccessible. Renton Ave S is the road most used to get to the top of the hill. Renton Ave S is a narrow,very steep street. Because of the street's narrowness downhill traffic must yield to uphill traffic(parking is restricted to the east side). In winter or during heavy rains the street is slick and treacherous. Large trucks serving the neighborhood have a difficult time making it up the hill and service vehicles,when they must use the west side of the street,pose a hazard. Renton Ave S is used for cross country runners and bicyclists for stamina training because of its steepness. I am concerned that 60 additional families using Renton Ave S and S 7th Street will cause a dangerous hazard because of the increased traffic.especially during the winter. Erosion—The hillside above the Cedar River is very steep and has trees. The trees on the hillside and on top of the hill will be removed,I suppose,to build the houses. I am concerned that the runoff from the new houses will erode the bank as well as run down S 7th street,causing more problems for the neighborhood. Habitat—The 60 homes development will eliminate ten acres of wooded land. The animals now living in the woods on the top of the hill will loose their habitat. Mountain bike riders will find that another place to enjoy is gone. The woods and the park complement each other. I feel that the number of new houses planned by Bennett Homes is too large. I would rather see the woods used for other purposes that would enhance the neighborhood rather than reduce the quality of life. Perhaps the woods could be kept as is and used as a bird and animal sanctuary where ecological and environmental studies could be carried out. I 1 2_ February 17,2000 I would like to see the City of Renton and the Renton School Board take an interest in this matter. Working together with the members of the neighborhood we could come up with an innovative program that would benefit the School District,the City,and the neighborhood. Sincerely, 14ASPACa&k Michael Mack and Cynthia Mack 906 High Ave S Renton,WA 98055 425-226-9262 N i {;;{ijtt�i`Sliltii�(ti({1i{i114I{{t(iiti(Fi{{kIi{{i(ii{{(l Z r.:.�.1;-'�'�"'='rS��C. !� 1 Ili i 1 1 1 j 1 1 l 1 l 1 till 546 Vf GA Y AN %.1g,) S sso/ • ii1V.2/4PX ‘/.7 "PIN a' 000.?co 1 ysnEE COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION TO: Gregg Zimmerman DATE: 02/21/00 FROM: Marilyn Petersen LOG#: 20019-C From 02/21/00-02/23/00, Council received and referred the following: • Letters from Renton Hill residents opposing proposed Bennett development of 50-60 homes, citing potential access problems from existing inadequate and narrow streets and elimination of wildlife habitat. (Cynthia and Michael Mack, 900 High Avenue S.; Bill Collins, 420 Cedar Avenue S.; Bartow Bennett, 1807 SE 7th Ct.; Ken Adams and Cheryl Danza, 706 Renton Avenue S.; Barry and Pat Conger, 1301 S. 9"' St.; Mario and Victor Tonda, 1308 Beacon Way S.; Ruth Bradley, 709 High Avenue S.; Carol Collins, 420 Cedar Avenue S.; Dwayne and Nancy Liston, 17703 114th Place SE; and Bert Custer, 714 Cedar Avenue S.; Ruth Larson, President Renton Hill Community Association, 714 High Avenue S.; Rich and Cindy Yarbrough, 338 Renton Avenue S.; Barbara Lux, 1412 S. 9th Street; Quentin and Rena Ellis, 715 High Avenue S.; Ralph and Ann Carter, 630 High Avenue S.; John and Patricia Burkhalter, 901 Jones Avenue S.;; Douglas and Dena Brandt, 610 Renton Ave. S.; and Dorlene Bressan, 901 High Avenue South; all Renton, WA 98055. Carolyn Ossorio, 105 Mercer Street, #113, Seattle, WA 98109; Rosemary Grassi, P.O. Box 1188, Renton 98057.) Please respond by: Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter with memo. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) XX Prepare letter(s) to citizen/agency with Mayor's signature and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor approves the letter, the Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return to you for mailing.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. Call Council secretary ASAP. (Copy of response to City Clerk not required.) c rIy i rs,lti- i , Other: »,� PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS. Please complete request by 3/8/00. Thank you. cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner, Councilmembers (8), Jay Covington h iiii,g A, ,p111 March 27, 2000 Mayor Jesse Tanner City of Renton 1055 So Grady Way CITY OF RENTON Renton, Wa 98055 APR 0 3 2-000 RECEIVED Re: Your Letter Dated March 22, 2000 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE (Development on Renton Hill) Dear Hon Mayor: aid eir v cf/ Thank you for responding to our February 17 letter. Apparently your staff was a little confused when compiling your response. Even though all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act, it also allowed variances for those properties that were not accessible except through improved road and street systems. The ten acres on top of Renton Hill, and subsequent 56 homes and related traffic, is such an area that can only be accessed by streets that are in excess of five feet narrower than the City's own Plan will allow for new developments. I am sure,that.the Comprehensive Plan would not allow legal street widths to be narrower than the law allows for new developments. Therefore, the re-zone somewhat conflicts with the City's laws,:and;:ordinancesfor minimum street width access. I doubt very seriously that the developer could afford to widen Renton Avenue for almost its entire length, nor Cedar Avenue, which was already re-built in 1975. Lastly, your letter stated: "By concentrating the growth within the city, the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of, or on the edges of, the City." It is highly unlikely that, unless physically relocated by the State Department of Game,the eight deer that inhabit our neighborhood will want to "develop in a habitat" outside the City limits. Since they raise their young in our back yards between Cedar and Jones and between 4th and 10th Streets, any new development in the ten acre natural habitat proposed for development will only force the deer deeper into our neighborhood instead of"outside the City limits." Thank you for your continued concern and I trust that level thinking will prevail. Sincerely, . L /1 is ,•,y t:A4`','ii1ti;. Mr,,and,,Mrs.Wm:Collins;. !wr :. _. i' .. . " .., . . ,. ..., :i: 420 Cedar.Ave:So., ( ,/ -.lf,i: l ... _ . . . .. • : ..,. : Renton;NWA 980557 :, .. I I . .. . ' cc: City Clerk,Jana Hanson, Jennifer Henning, and Elizabeth Higgins =71e,,it,/ne..-rsi.b.e.4-0, COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION TO: Gregg Zimmerman DATE: 03/16/00 FROM: Marilyn Petersen LOG#: 20019-C On 3/15/00, Council received and referred the following: Letter from Josephine Potter, 1314 S. 7th Street, Renton, WA 98055, opposes proposed Bennett development on Renton Hill. Please respond by: Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter with memo. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare letter(s) to citizen/agency with Mayor's signature and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor approves the letter, the Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return to you for mailing.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. Call Council secretary ASAP. (Copy of response to City Clerk not required.) XX Other: Please write to parties of record and explain the public input process. Please provide copy to City Clerk. PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS. Please complete request by 3/20/00. Thank you. Mayor, Councilmembers, Jay C. //kd4 /),°reR70 • 00(1/)(7e; ee7- 0:e, CeW ,‘ CITY OF RENTON 4 ,t_flzeer/4k-e".'ef igef. wc MAR 1 5 2000 RECEIVED -\7,--0a-e- r- / biTY CLERK'S OFFICE a...,sea4eece.2 .0,f-- -..ee---0, ce-fee4,,,,x_e,e4el ---- el , ' . .a44,xeeiloe, -...41e..., es26ede -- f.,,e -c-fe-te , . etee.i,e-tor,a47r- ia.,,e. ts15(Geee.-_,4,egfe,:_e,/iie6v-ea-, 7- frisfizec,e-p-oe,er„.ee. ig-4 ,= eeti4e-esereee>/i_ereif_J iliee-redg‘.~e=e4he: ..07,,,weelzt,,e_if,~424‘,1a, 4;-= 1 f-e e/e;ecr- get-Petiv j -i' taalfael°77Ze - a0.e490 /4( ,i ftZ te‘f lfr elee .i°1'e Cire ea IWP, e ' s'.*' la.°ef/e. ";rrat ‘ ele"eeer/e4 C4iF:, . fiK,er 9 e c./1, 4e C3WReetr,Aie6frf-aetpl' eele e-e-e/ f3.6et,# /fr e- 401.5: '7Mgeee, ttlirtAlqh1 tkkikcl\ 4 n - 4i q 14k1, 10.1 1101 kilA ,1 1K40 -it 111144 \111041 111111 r---bit • ._‘ 7L7'T _ 4eV77a2 -)f12?° 7 a379-- -pf ".#P76/ 9# --Ax2owy'W, P- 2d14' 391 , 4 0A 7tiq --70VW /07111 712702Y1.2 .17-71- „ � ' u M.p otter � L E � 4Gm / S� � \ - 98055 . Renton_ i ! CITY OFREN|uN { � � � ""� »�� | � RECEIVED ' \ ^ CiTy CLERK'S OFFICE / /) \ ' - | . \ ( ` -wxH��u\`��]Auo\��n\�,n�uj,1, 11n^J1Jt 1111 i,D 11 � \ � L__-_' - _ - --' - — '---- -- ---- -- -- -- - --- '- --'-- ---' --- - --- ---� - ' ' CITY OF RENTON MAR 0 9 2000 RECEIVED 3/8/00 To: Renton City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE • This letter is in response to the information I have gathered from going to two separate meetings. One was with representatives of Bennett Homes along with concerned citizens and one with concerned citizens at the Holiday inn. The first meeting turned out to be a fact finding mission of Bennett Homes to find out where their opposition stood and what issues they were going to have to work around knowing that this project was not going to be well received by anyone. After dancing around the question's asked by those attending I asked if we could just ask for an informal vote of hands for those in favor of this project. They accepted and out of a full house there was only one person who thought it might be a good idea. Negative issues associated if this project was allowed: 1.60 to 80 homes would equal an-additional 120 to 160 cars.-- 2.Traffic on two roads to the project are basically one way. 3.Roads to this project are in need of repair now. Construction equip. would totally destroy what is left of the roads. As if Renton needs more road construction. 3.One would wonder what liability this increased traffic would have on City of Renton after a critical injury accident occurred due to this volume of traffic on streets not designed to handle this increase. 4.Phillip Arnold Park would be greatly impacted by increased traffic and I think use of this park by citizens of Renton would decrease. Children now have a large assurance of safety due to being located on a dead in street and local traffic. 5.The above issues would have increased costs of road maintenance, not to count on the additional traffic that would come from Cascade and other communities to South and East. 6.Along with this increased traffic from outside areas our crime rate would most likely increase which I believe was one of the reasons the gate was put in. 7.What I think this would cause: A. Increased road maintenance cost. B. Increased police coverage due to increased burglaries and car prowls. C. Increased fire and emergency response due to traffic and related accidents. D. Increased tension on Hill due to stress of difficult driving conditions and lack of feeling of security that is now a high point in living here. The City of Renton has been doing a good job of developing projects that benefit the City . I am sure this piece of property could be put to better use to increase the value of our communities rather than to degrade a great community. After all from what I understand the City of Renton owns this property.(Renton School District) Thank You a Ord City of Renton tax payer and voter Phil&Bonnie Johnson SIB E-eAf�rx. , s . �"bhiIIip E._ Johnson 350 Renton Ave. n - z USA L/STA Renton, WA 98055-3016 ;Iy - _ r . Ewa _ • • 1 C`( i • /0 5.5 SO cc.-z---t+• G`P-A-by • ser'rf...7: ,--:,,:a.::,-2. _I iininliitii„III li ,,,iii3stihaitiiiililiiiiliiiilii March 5, 2000 Renton City Council Members CITY OF RENTON City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way MAR 0 8 2000 Renton,WA 98055 RECEIVED Dear Councilperson: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Subject: Sale of Renton School District Property—Renton Hill We have been a resident of Renton Hill for over 50 years. Over the years we have come to appreciate what a close-knit community in America represents,neighbors working together,helping one another, and taking pride in preserving their historic neighborhood. It was my understanding when the property in question was originally purchased many years ago by the Renton School District it was then zoned for Public Use. The original intent of this property as we understand it was to construct an elementary school, but of course that did not happen. Now, as a result of a rezone to meet the City's Comprehensive Plan requirements the citizens of this neighborhood will have to endure, not just a substantial increase in the noise level during the construction phase, but of course the multiple heavy equipment truck deliveries to this site. At the conclusion of the project we will then be faced with an enormous increase of traffic over these roads. The community of Renton Hill has been blessed with one of the lowest crime rates in this city. A sizeable number of residents that reside on this hill represent third and even fourth generation families. We look out for each other and care for one another. To increase the population of this hill by an additional one-third will jeopardize not only the security of the residents, increase traffic, but moreover everything this hill represents. The homes that have been built on the hill over the years are individual in style. New residential development today represents a rubber stamp mentality— every third or fourth house the same. If this projected construction were to take place we would lose the unique quality of construction that many of our ancestors have worked so hard to preserve. Please reconsider the sale of this property to a large developer and consider other uses for the property that would remain in line with education—for which the land was initially intended. Several options have been explored, all of which seem viable and feasible. If we believe that our youth is our future—perhaps it would be time to acknowledge the use of this property for educational development, and that is to explore the concept of a nature and wildlife facility that would encourage our youth to recognize the importance of plant and wildlife as it relates to our environment. You would then receive overwhelming support from a community that has been a strong supporter of our public school system. Thank you for your consideration. ,. .. <4 6 if. 6't4 A� +;s c c:,.,.; Sincerely, ,,O a 6444eti � " /'/?�4 � "" • Lynn&Marian Thrasher i 904 Grant Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 . M. Lynn &Marian Thrasher • fL Gr `y �: P 904 Grant Ave S y� _ �` ', ._ Renton WA 98055 ma.y C' m A R ri' CITY OF RENTON ,„„ cif`,>`/ _ MAR 0 8 2000 11 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 11111111111111111111111111111111 Renton City Council Members City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way • \ Renton,WA 98055 :,'L_� Il:Iialli 411m1-111::I:1::1II:,,,Li ,Ii,1;1:is1:i"1,1:i.11,1 February 29, 2000 CITY OF RENTON MAR 0 8 2000 RECEIVED Renton City Council CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA. 98055 Dear Renton City Council Members: I am writing this letter to express my concerns/objections to the proposed sale of the property directly across from Phillip Arnold Park on Renton Hill, to Bennett Homes with the intent_to build 60 new homes on the said property. My concern is three fold;traffic, safety and access and the impact 60 additional homes would have on these areas. Currently due to the high number of vehicles parked along the only two streets(Renton Ave. S. and Cedar Ave. S.)that access our neighborhood, each street has become a one way street supporting two way traffic. In recent years we have had to erect signs imposing a"Yield to uphill Traffic" rule as it-became increasingly dangerous playing "chicken" with our neighbors."We have in fact had a fatality on Renton Ave. S.,which precipitated the current signage. Renton Avenue South also has the distinction of coming to a peak at the top of the hill, which has been labeled"Limited Sight Distance this translates to the real world as"ZERO Sight Distance". It frightens me to imagine the potential for further fatalities with an additional 120 vehicles (low estimate)traveling either of these two narrow streets. Renton Hill has the pleasure of having a beautiful park, Phillip Arnold, within our neighborhood and it is well utilized throughout the spring, summer and fall by many people throughout the city. The neighborhood has always accepted the increase in traffic during these seasons as the"price to pay" for having a wonderful park practically in our backyards. That traffic in and of itself can make a one minute trip to the bottom of the hill into a seven minute trip dodging cars, waiting your turn yielding to uphill traffic and then waiting through several cycles of the traffic light at the bottom of the hill. More traffic means more time, more dodging, more potential for an accident. I am equally concerned about the access of emergency vehicles to the neighborhood. Due to the steep grade of the road it is currently a slow, labor intensive trip up the hill for any large vehicle, especially a fire truck: What would happen should a large truck carrying building materials etc.(become stuck on one'of these narrow streets? There would be no alternative route for an emergency vehicle to utilize. I am not in favor of further jeopardizing the 5 response time of emergency vehicles thus 1eopardizing my life or the life of my neighbors for any reason. I have lived on Renton Hill for over 35 years. My family has been here for over 80 years. During that time the hill has evolved from a working coal mine to an established neighborhood. The remnants of the coal mine exist to this day, and plague the structural integrity of streets around the hill. Renton Avenue South alone has a significant dip in the street, rumor has it from an old coal mineshaft, which must be black topped every couple of years. What would the impact of areas such as this be from the additional 120 vehicles, large trucks carrying heavy loads etc.? I personally would rather not find out. As noted above I have lived in this neighborhood for many years. My family and myself have enjoyed a quality of life unknown to many. As a child I played at Phillip Arnold Park daily and never had to fear being hit by a car on the way home while crossing one of the quiet streets or being killed a half a block from home in a head on collision. I rarely worried about crime, as the"hill" has always been somewhat isolated from other parts of Renton due to the lack of access to the neighborhood. A low crime rate is a quality we continue to enjoy. Traffic has continued to increase which has made it more of a"challenge"to back out of ones driveway or to enjoy a"quiet afternoon". I cannot support a project that would increase this traffic and noise pollution three fold. I consider 60 additional homes on the"hill" a rape of my neighborhood and of open spaces. This brings me to my suggestion for the use of the property across from Phillip Arnold Park on the pipeline. The neighborhood is blessed with a wide variety of wild life, and vegetation. These animals from raccoons and rabbits to several families of deer call this area in question "home". These creatures habitat is quickly shrinking and more and more they are searching our backyards for food. It is not uncommon to see a full-grown buck strolling down the middle of the street. Currently we drive slowly around them, what would happen when 120 additional cars use the road? ROAD KILL. That is not acceptable. I would strongly support the use of the said property as a wildlife and natural vegetation habitat for everyone to enjoy. Better yet an educational natural reserve for the Renton School District and others. A far better use of one of the last open spaces in our neighborhood. In closing I would like to say that I strongly believe that Renton Hill would not benefit in any way from the Bennett Homes proposed project of building 60 new homes. In fact I believe that we would only be left with the unpleasant consequences once Bennett Homes has packed up and left. I hope you consider this matter fully before sacrificing our lives, our quality of life and that of the wildlife, for there truly is "no place like home". Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Gina Custer y'.4 : 1 v ;'e•��... /A09 S ' 7 `33.USA _s • Custer L E T --�� J . i Ms.Gina M. ? • p �, ,,�� 1209 S 7th St �1 �� v � • .�•r Renton WA 98055-3068 co \ 1 F REr1TON ,,i.\R; ^._a _ \ CITY MAR 0 8 2000� RECEIVED . CITY ARK S OFFICE \ . . • L 055 5• ems/may wA• i\ . � °ib0ss .e• iV' +'2 II!!1'SIlllilhlttllifflllt{!lllSS tilllili11l9ii1111S1Ili7l l7 ti ' I}.y COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION TO: Gregg Zimmerman DATE: 03/09/00 FROM: Marilyn Petersen LOG#: 20019-C On 3/8/00 and 3/9/00, Council received and referred the following: Letters from Renton Hill residents opposing proposed Bennett development: Lynn and Marian Thrasher, 904 Grant Avenue South; Gina Custer, 1209 S. 7t'' Street; and Phil and Bonnie Johnson, 350 Renton Avenue S., Renton WA 98055. Please respond by: Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter with memo. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare letter(s) to citizen/agency with Mayor's signature and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor approves the letter, the Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return to you for mailing.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. Call Council secretary ASAP. (Copy of response to City Clerk not required.) XX Other: Add names to parties of record list. Mail response to each party explaining the public hearing process. PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS. Please complete request by 3/15/00.. Thank you. cc: Mayor, Councilmembers (8), Jay Covington March 2, 2000 , ; "r} CITY OF RENTON ray- r 'r , Renton City Council t .'y:i • - MAR 0 6 ' 2000 City of Renton RECEIVED 1055 South Grady Way CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton,Wa. 98055 Ladies and Gentlemen, I was recently made aware of the fact that Bennett Home developers will be requesting permits for the purpose of building on property across from Phillip Arnold Park. I strongly believe that this would have a very negative impact on the Renton Hill neighborhood. The traffic with its increase in spring summer and fall when the usage of the park on top of the hill goes up tremendously together with slow vehicle traffic such as delivery trucks, garbage trucks, cable repair trucks etc.,would make the neighborhood that much less livable and safe for families. Renton Avenue has a steep grade, `downhill traffic must yield signs"and also must have access maintained for emergency vehicles. There is also a lack of signage, very few speed limit signs on entire hill, as well as no cross walks. I personally live about two thirds up the hill, at which point there is a very limited sight distance and steep grade. I believe that adding that many more homes,would be more than this neighborhood and the existing roads could absorb. I am certain that there would be other uses for this property that would benefit the school district and the City of Renton. Please give this serious consideration. Sincerely, kr242.Agnes Koestl, 428 Renton Ave. So. Renton,Wa. 98055 425 228-1834 Fax 425, 228-0658 cc.to Jesse Tanner, Mayor Dr. Dolores Gibbons,Renton School Dist. Renton School Board School Dist. 403 I•iIiuht1lxililiiiizFiliFilif FiilliiiliiiFl Fliliillilit it i - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - I 1 __2_- 86 - . J I ---411 -44 62271-t?-- _15-e/ 22d, i . -3 -/-/--zigy * e < ;P - _ y C, --P� M. Ann Houser 2331 SE 8th Place Renton, WA 98055 March 3, 2000 CITY OF RENT MAR 0 6 2000 Renton City Council RECEIVED City of Renton 1;Fs:. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Bennett Homes Developers Dear Council Members: This letter is about the proposed building permits to develop 10.8 acres of property adjacent to the Philip Arnold Park with approximately 60 to 70 homes. I am against the building of these new homes. I understand this property is owned by the Renton School District#403. Why wasn't this property offered to the City of Renton or the parks department? It would be a great way to expand the Philip Arnold Park with more playing fields,recreational paths and trails. Local families with children need more areas to enjoy. I think we need to care about existing families and their needs before we add to the community. An alternative would be to leave the area as it is for the existing animals and continued protection for the steep bluffs in the area. We know this is a continuing problem after the past several years of heavy rain. Why would you want to create a potential problem? Storm water runoff is in existing problem. How many areas in Renton enjoy the wildlife that exists in this area. I certainly do and would like to keep it. I don't even mind the deer dining on my garden. I'll change my gardening choices before I complain. Some of the problems that will arise if this development is allowed to be completed are as follows: major road construction and inconveniences during construction phases, over population, over crowding and over use of existing utilities (even the local park and ride is already over crowded) and increased vulnerability to neighboring communities such as Falcon Ridge for burglaries and vandalism. There will be a major traffic impact to the Renton Hill road system that will create traffic problems and pose a danger to the residents. The streets are narrow and require yielding to oncoming vehicles and pose a problem for emergency vehicle response. Please vote against this development. Sincerely, ' ` ` ' � ' � `-E co ��o�uu�� m�u�w�~ � �00Sto�art8tcoot 8n�o100O 9�O�u� 8ou�3o,WaehiuQtoo ` [ . �� Cmnno _- � City of-'` \�m� ' �n� R�� lU55 "~--- - _ ,,~, g�0�5 WA \ RcmAon, ^ ' ' � = ~ Dina N.Calhoun Robert E.Davis Renton Hill Neighborhood 433 Cedar Avenue S. Renton,WA 98055 Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON City of Renton t i P4 1e/" 4 !P T -41 1055 South Grady Way a a S d i ai s j Renton,WA 98055 MAR 0 3 2000 25 February,2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear Renton City Council: Our neighborhood is concerned about the proposed development on the Renton School District property across from Phillip Arnold Park. We understand that Bennett Homes,a developer,is proposing to erect no less than 60 homes at this location using our neighborhood streets to access these homes. Renton Hill residents have met twice for the purpose of discussing the negative impacts of this development on our neighborhood. The purpose of this letter is to express our opposition to the proposed development. Our biggest concern lies with the traffic problems that the proposed development will create. Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South barely support current traffic volumes. These two steep, narrow streets are the only access to the proposed development site. In our opinion,posted speeds of 25 mph are too fast for streets such as these and the temptation to exceed the speed limit downhill(and uphill as well)is great. There are already many speed limit violators. An increase in traffic will simply increase the frequency of cars exceeding the speed limit. The streets in the neighborhood will require modification at the expense of the city to maintain safe access if the traffic volumes are to increase. These modifications may include the addition of speed bumps,traffic circles and stop signs and a reduced speed limit through the neighborhood to keep Renton and Cedar Avenues from becoming unsafe thoroughfares. An increased traffic load will also hasten the deterioration of the condition of our streets. The Renton Hill neighborhood streets were built on very active land;just take a look at the cracked and sloping streets, sidewalks and retaining walls that line Renton and Cedar Avenues. Another concern we have is for the wildlife that inhabits the greenbelt that currently occupies the school district property. If this natural area is replaced with houses, it will push even more of the resident animals into our neighborhood. Deer,raccoon,opossums,frogs, skunks,coyotes,owls,woodpeckers and even black bear would be pushed out of their habitat and forced to share our backyards with us even more so than they already do. We believe that this property could better serve the city of Renton,the school district and our neighborhood as a wildlife sanctuary with interpretive nature trails. The nature trails could connect the Cedar River trail to Phillip Arnold Park. This property is rich not only with native flora and fauna,but with Renton's coal mining history as well. Trails on this property could be used to educate Renton's citizens on the history of their city and the abundant wildlife that greenbelts such as this preserve just blocks from downtown. We believe that the Renton Hill neighborhood would be a willing source of volunteer labor to make such a project the jewel of Renton's park system. It would be a shame to lose this property and its potential benefits to the community to yet another development. We are deeply concerned about the many negative impacts that the sale and proposed development of this property would have on the Renton Hill neighborhood. We hope that the city of Renton will reject any permits for the proposed development and reconsider more beneficial uses of the school district property. pectfully, 'Dina N.Calhoun and Robert E.Davis Cc: Mayor Jesse Tanner,Renton School Board,and Dr. Dolores Gibbons, Superintendent,Renton School District Robert E. Davis Dina N.Calhoun r LE t� 433 Cedar Avenue South Renton, WA w P M 98055 `p 9 Firs t_,�► 11s1„I,.I.I1,iiii,I,iI,1„ 11,1 Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 • COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION TO: Gregg Zimmerman DATE: 03/02/00 FROM: Marilyn Petersen LOG#: 20019-C On 3/3/00-3/6/00, Council received and referred the following: Additional letters from Renton Hill residents opposing proposed Bennett development of 50-60 homes, citing potential access problems from existing inadequate and narrow streets and elimination of wildlife habitat. (Hopkins S. Chambers, P.O. Box 691, Renton 98057; Dina Calhoun&Robert Davis, 433 Cedar Avenue S.; M. Ann Houser, 2331 SE 8th Place; and Agnes Koestl, 428 Renton Ave. S., all Renton 98055.) Please respond by: Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter with memo. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare letter(s) to citizen/agency with Mayor's signature and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor approves the letter, the Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return to you for mailing.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. Call Council secretary ASAP. (Copy of response to City Clerk not required.) XX Other: Add names to parties of record list. Mail response to each party explaining the public hearing process. PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS. Please complete request by 3/8/00.. Thank you. cc: Mayor, Councilmembers (8), Jay Covington •b 4� a- � � 7 CITY OF RENTON �� MAR 0 3 2000 RECEIVED 7-I)/b• G i'r`yCm4` CITY CLERK'S OFFICE aZe_ d) Gt;A -&z1 1G,T 2teeti-L4-.2- LP ZZ-f 4/ e % / 7424.. z e244 caf //6wte.. de-,74LeA, aec_ bEtv,644.6,4k_ tx, d2ce-6 °%-7227_ _ idcLeyy gd-6 • m, - 4,-7,07/1) /2:10 a-e--. Lt //it I-742 , 1 v ��a PS ‘Q9 / - L E il flAd /t)d-9W 1 4ci; P M ,,,—......, co \ 2 MAR �e'�.� __ _— 7nn:' ...----------- *761111111":--------- -1-- K.,____It://:.-Les . Or/,",tc :' alii w ilii:1111 m li m ill u ni ll!?lilliliitl?Fillit C--f 4 t CITY OF RENTOfg r"4.,•4;z MAR 0191W RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFFICE da- Z4.0t7 le;n* °Av 1144 /X-4/107"f ,� 44 ..eSf 1/44'7Psv f/a0414 Ae.&,fr>417e /47,4.47', e 44/At ;g 74L P141, •4/ Wx;, illW744C ,✓ . � / 01 ./1, /l/4d, ,tee- t+ � aev7W44 ,11**7 iZ� mo , Zge4 -�jf� 4 ,1. L'W qt ANi % itAW Oa * .6q11q1 “ 't4q ( illyttt41 11 41 \ P . 4 k , it'JOtekN - W60 4 \ 1 r,3 t, f a • . . t K i l'S •f obel 24Fr 'r/los,d42411:1 tie;04 troy. .41 ° - (7(7- , 84i* °1°// "` 98Q . `J�••'�•.t««'��' •'•+:�:+ IIB1F?i?F1i SFfFS1F�FF�iIiFFI}F'.Fl!lli11'siFI i I?I IF3??iiiit _{r • 4 4 4 • March 1,2000 To: Jesse Tanner, Mayor Dr. Dolores Gibbons, Superintendent City of Renton Renton School District 403 1055 South Grady Way 300 S.W. 7th Street Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 CITY OF RENTON Renton City Council Renton School Board MAR 0 2 2000 City of Renton Renton School District 403 1055 South Grady Way 300 S.W. 7th Street RECEIVED Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Subject: Bennet Homes Development,Near Philip Arnold Park. It is my understanding that a major housing development is planned for the area north east of Philip Arnold Park. I wish to protest this action and request the school district and City of Renton collaborate on a better plan for this property. As a resident of a home in the Falcon Ridge Residential Park community I feel this development will have a severe detrimental effect on the security of our gated homes and residences. Further, I feel that further development on the bluff area above Maple Valley is dangerous and can cause slides and impact the environment of the greenbelt areas. I can also visualize the traffic problems created in the narrow streets on Renton Hill as well as the already over crowded streets at the base of the hill on Main and Houser streets. Many of my neighbors and friends use the Renton Hill streets for jogging, walking, and enjoyment because we are distant from any trails or pathways enjoyed by the City of Renton residents. At Falcon Ridge, we enjoy an abundance of wild animals and birds that live on the power line right of way and greenbelt areas. Depletion of the animal habitat will obviously impact the habitat and ability of the animals to live safely and increase the amount of "road-kill"that is evident now. Why can't the City expand on the park system and trails for the good of the community rather than gouging for every penny of tax revenue by high density home construction. I feel the property could be better used for all of the people in the southeast sector rather than crowding more people into a small area. I request that you consider other uses for the property and collaborate between the School District and City for better use of the property and consideration for the local residents. Dwight&Janice Potter 2411-SE 8th Place Renton, Wa. 98055 j:'' - a. •,:fes .....i-fa•••• •••hiitr. .# • •••• 33USA ... 11. ..•••••••• •••••...., ...... Dttu-g. la P• Pattvt .01-E iv --..,, r -- 2411 SE 8th PLack. v -v Renton. WA 98055 e`/Y PM s ....------- . ,/ r.• -- c. ,$) ...... ?9 FEB — ....... - 1 g„......i,-.., e.,...,t, i 0 5-c. .4..1M 14,,t 4., yeil.lay tatid -en-jr)11 g - Cig° 5-5- -SS•r:-...,----- ? -2 \:: IIIIIIIilliatsilli11111hjsOillillil CITY O¢i-RE 4 al-00 0 MAR 0 2 2000 RECEIVED ReNT 0/11 G C CITY CLERK'S OFFICE dCc Gr r/ f ev4 r,f75 70 ivf)Q T r- //ot/vie Pe & /Ore2f [,t, t1 v 0-0 . pc 72e6)c(es !(rt c / '(R/1,1 /t 5 T O a'7 l-71c)ci/1eS Oaf 7q2-OO/27-y 69 ap-055 /-4)-044 /)/7 / /V ( Z(//G / M-/?-/T- Otv P-e,frt7c))/, !' /7 v .erLy 1 ctcy/i ppfiof D 7-6 7 ii fRJ c T, �c� RPP-JOrys /111-e we pO fU U T Poll-Ai T O 6T T? I1/Ao u/0 f-rvi) pOz,As4 Pe44,7 Ott H.% / j '►cfec -f TC-c l)erc.y pny ye/'Gc.rs P • e S/E I-i /1/Oc-v Gr"v C fjlaap W !�� r*� ��f'vf� % r,64 ?'O<i✓ GC r Ifivn Dc' 1-1 . C(le_ 61A-ve.. c)rtiff y eNe VtivO (4 AG111--- litive. Or= 12cm-D CA, a-1t-S pliZke p an. / Cfe G9-`°, c i o a / 1 /('ke 7-0 See ! 6e of o-m.2 0,5e,0 .Sou le- i4v o j__h aa ;Tb1-4' C2 -(fri9 cv-011. 7L pc-C- o 13.?"7-CA) es /!/ %h e ,5•1 c d/ , r rZ/C lam/ 0. C�'-7"y O f.- 7a'iw - 77h , o Coce/1 $e u sc'0 p'6/Z r/v vin oni ai!eiv tt-/ 6(p Tz IF; 0-% 10c-'/1./1=��— �c/ sly %S,_ 7(1./) - CM-iv �e Pow C r & n7ouovte__ er R s - /yoo ,S� 7f-k ST • Pal-LT GId'dL)�s 33U S" John R. Giuliani �4 F �y ,�,._.—.,- ---�'" . 1400 South 7th Street �.; F ov Renton, WA 98055-3063 ' w �Ilf,c3 J it RePre7 , C'Ty Ccatvc; Crry 6r Re,--Y O/1% /oiT Sou 7f Gi °y &c o y Rewie IV. C 'a 9 'Oc 6 i s ears5 --* 1 ��w !tti!?fifliIISffllt lliiiiiiiiiitlifililliti Si d11#11i id ds1illil r 4 .;- . re 4 .1e4 g •c 1 j_z_ 6 c-,-/z:----A . , 7/ ? ,)---, h,a:s 4 ve..=, s 7-)K : "J4' ' , — / eocAeociz- --ro _ c_ , I „ , CITY OF RENT _MAU/2_2000 REGEWED g / et 06Q• /111A1 • CITY CLERK'S OFFICE _ 19. 14 Resioe..-7 n/i (.3 it-- 13 Li- ri7o ^I e7 l'i/1 v 4: 1,-ive to o i,1 g. tE NT-ca id 0 .5 "9- Nett, / V er c7 ..5/-1 o &Li_ IJ IN) or H etv&— t 0 V'J R. 1 T p...-- 7 0 to A 0 , os 7- -THAT A 2.=.-- ni-ra '7 ri t-t iv a 7- y i e- et/ .4 s7 1 7 J_•:.es PA...E klier/ dc- 0 rA/4,-7 1 0 a 0 /:: 7,11 7-6.ft, -r, c 0 iv 7/1 •-•- 771 ti--. A. 0,4 0 A s I 7- es /vow 6 4 --J.../ 7-1--1 1...----- 0 A rz s -7-c-) fa 171/ 77)Akt. To Vo fi,4 0 ti z_:-:-.01 c.. i / 1--'li2:E Mus7 (az:— 4- ,7--- -1-771 0 c 7 v.i "I 7A-/e.„---- , Xo .di /-//9 v=: , a V r 1 if C /9a ti: r 4.4 A. 1._ . 77/zi-a / s ,Jo 1AI)1\( 7 rs' 7-1-1 1 5 v\I c, IT 4-0 77/'97 1/1-//-5 l' oi 0 ci y.I P P P i ft "/ 01-J-) L2 ..2- 0 a c' ,=?R-s Ig P rt-/ A / I-1--- tr-:- e:,--ft 7 gr-2,-1 ,,i c_tlik , 0 Je r) i )-,/9 7- 11,.5 / .2*-- v\f /-c La/ 41-A/7 01/ 7?4 I 6- - ' '1 .... 7 / .., Rtz= /Id re ' 96P-0 , --- Mpf % `ter 2.--7e /uM , N�� _ 0• • VSLIEE February 28, 2000 Jesse Tanner,Mayor Dr. Dolores Gibbons, Superintendent City of Renton Renton School District 403 . CITY OF RENTON 1055 S. Grady Way 300 S.W. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 MAR 0 1 2000 RECEIVED Renton City Council Renton School Board CM CLERK'S OFFICE City or Renton Renton School District 403 1055 S. Grady Way 300 S.W. 7th Street Renton, WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 To Whom It May Concern: We live on Renton Ave. S., five houses up from the freeway. We are responding to the proposed Bennett Homes development being built at the top of Renton Hill near Arnold Park. We would like to state our concerns for consideration by the Renton City Council to halt the continuance of this project. As homeowners on Renton Hill, we contend now with traffic, noise,pollution,and most recently a robbery in our home. We appreciate our wonderful neighborhood,and enjoy our neighbors. We applaud the courteous and thoughtful people who travel day and night up Renton Ave. S. But,we also mirror the concerns of many of our co-homeowners. We are dreading the even busier,noisier, increasingly dangerous fast driving, congestion,ecological destruction,and ever-growing inconsiderate people who will try to squeeze themselves up two roads to get to the top of Renton Hill. This will be happening while many locals and visitors are trying to go to Arnold Park. We are fortunate in the fact that we do not have to travel far to get home; but can imagine those people who have several more blocks,many more hazards, and traffic/construction inconveniences that we don't have to deal with. It seems that with the increase of housing developments and the increased population trying to converge into a small space; and the potential of another couple hundred cars trying to make their way up the hill; we would destroy even further our comfort, lose control of our neighborhood,and most alarming,cause ecological damage and destruction to our ever-diminishing wildlife. We would love to see the natural part of Renton Hill be left for our children's children to enjoy. A nature conservatory or bird sanctuary or a wildlife refuge would be much preferred to more homes, more concrete and more pollution. Thank you for your consideration in alternative ventures into the use and saving of Renton Hill. We would be ever grateful and appreciative. Sincerely, C),11-ra /gr•- '4 Monica and Mike Bishop 326 Renton Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 425 226 9659 Michael J. Bishop --ortm Monica M. Hayes 326 Renton Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON MAR 0 1 2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton City Council City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 ILIiiliiiiiI1111I1I11LI111II1I o' 524 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 February 25, 2000 Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way MAR 0 1 2000 Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear Members of Renton City Council, I'm writing to express my opposition to the proposed Bennett Homes development project across from Philip Amold Park, on Renton Hill. The standard concerns such as increased traffic into a self- contained/low-infrastructure community, safety issues surrounding narrow "downhill traffic must yield" streets and lack of signs, and increased road maintenance are all valid. But there is something else, too. Thanks to the sheer greed of certain developers, our communities in the Puget Sound area are now victims of inadequate infrastructure. Cookie-cutter housing projects such as that proposed by Bennett Homes offer nothing to, and show no respect for, the communities they infringe upon. Viewing the proposed number of homes per acre it is clear that the intent of the Bennet Homes project on Renton Hill is simply to maximize profit, with no interest in giving anything back to the community, not even a unique collection of homes. Surely we can use this parcel of land to better effect, and retain some small part of our city's heritage. Isn't it time we put an end to development that benefits merely the developer, and not the community? Isn't it time that we reward contractors who take pride in their work, and not merely their worth? Sincerely, 4r2 4 .- James E. Baker ,,ex/4.--- r sa u si SZ y/72,'/Ave CITY OF RENTON MAR 0 1 2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ./1744) C ?y w 6/-"(di 1/1,74z7' /�,-t,<0, yv4 1)S.5` Sear.„MS4r :G.'.L iitltl�tt�l111ttt�tltl�t�tttl�ttl�tltt��1[t�t�a�t�tt1[itttill� DEONE&CHRIS PERLATTI 1520 SO. 9TH STREET RENTON, WA 98055 February 24, 2000 CITY OF RENTON Renton City Council F E B 2 9 2000 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Renton City Council: I'm writing to address my concern about the property located on top of Old Renton Hill that is owned by the Renton School District. Bennett Homes is proposing to build 60-69 homes across from Phillip Arnold Park. It would be a grave mistake to let this happen. I have been a resident of this neighborhood for 32 years. My home is directly across from the park. My children and family enjoy riding bikes and walking throughout the neighborhood. Building this high number of homes would create entirely more traffic than our streets and sidewalks could possibly handle. Not only regular car traffic, but UPS trucks, garbage trucks, telephone/cable repair trucks, etc. that would be associated with any new development this size. This would then become a huge safety issue for all the adults and children in this area, possibly requiring traffic signals, new sidewalks, crosswalks and much more traffic signage. This would be trying to turn our neighborhood into the city. This small 10 acre piece of property should be savored and valued for it's serenity as there are so few places like this left in this area. The wild-life that have made their homes in this wooded area would be greatly threatened. An extenuation of our beautiful park or something of that nature would be a great asset for the Renton Community as a whole to enjoy. Please reconsider your thoughts on this property. Sincerely, Deone&Christopher Perlatti Renton Hill Residents r II"'('I 91'1I1!IIif191(IlI((l 11(1(II(911I1(1('II(lI(tlf .. `.Y:_..b. _• '^`. cob VP') -)aPc g c__ GZ 'f ds114...� r� C� 2/27/2000 Renton City Council CITY OF RENTON City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way FEB 2 9 2000 Renton, WA 98055 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Dear Renton City Council, We have received information that the Renton School District plans to sell the property North of Phillip Arnold Park to a developer. The developer, Bennett Homes, plans to build a large number of houses on the property. We are opposed to this sale. The Renton Hill neighborhood is a large cul-de-sac with limited access. A large number of new houses, with the additional traffic, will put an unacceptable strain on the existing residential streets. The 2 streets that are used for access to Renton Hill are narrow, with parking on both sides of one, Cedar Ave. S., and parking on one side of the other, Renton Ave. S. We have to wait for up-hill traffic to _ clear before we can go down hill now. A large number of, additional, vehicles would be unacceptable. We hope an alternate plan for the School District property, that doesn't involve allowing a large number of houses being built, can be found. Thank you, Mr. & Mrs. W. Free 1012 High Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 14"-t-‘47‘ : ^ tea_ c�� tom ,�,. �� v,f/��/'/ ii Bill Free .Wj RENTON HIGH AVE. S K a r� 4, ' WA 98055-3914 Il,lttlttlillttttltl"Council iiillil Renton City City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 2 2 a,1 Ilfittittitlittttitlttitltttlltttlttttlttttl,l till,IItl,ttlltl 9�r5'55-3 CITY OF RENTON FEB 202000 February 22, 2000 RECEIVED FIDE ITY CLERK'S OF Jesse Tanner, Mayor Dr. Dolores Gibbons, Supt. City of Renton Renton School District #403 1055 South Grady Way 300 S.W. 7th Street Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 C Renton City Council (a' Renton School Board City of Renton Renton School District #403 1055 South Grady Way 300 S .W. 7th Street Renton, Wa. 98055 Renton, Wa. 98055 As a property owner on Renton Hill I object to the proposed Bennett Homes Development of at least 60 homes across from Philip Arnold Park. This would mean at least 120 more cars on the hill. The traffic on this hill is now more than we should have to put up with. Nine times out of ten when I drive down my street I have to pull over at least once to allow uphill traffic through. When there are garbage trucks, delivery trucks etc. on the street it becomes ridiculous . The negative impact on traffic, safety and emergency vehicle access would be a detriment to life in this neighborhood. I would hope that the Renton School District and the City of Renton could come up with an alternate plan that would benefit both and at the same time preserve our hill . Sincerely Diane B. Hyatt 720 Cedar Ave. So. Renton, Wash. 98055 ( 425) 228-1725 tr._pi Diane Hyatt 720 Cedar Ate- S. .�.► Renton,WA 98055-3044 PM ip �„�..- . y` ',USA 25fE Gs mini) RELATION CITY CO UNCIL CITY OF R ,]TON 1055 :SOUTH GRADY WAY RENTON, WA. 98055 COUNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION TO: Gregg Zimmerman DATE: 03/02/00 FROM: Marilyn Petersen LOG#: 20019-C On 2/28/00-3/2/00, Council received and referred the following: Additional letters from Renton Hill residents opposing proposed Bennett development of 50-60 homes, citing potential access problems from existing inadequate and narrow streets and elimination of wildlife habitat. (Diane Hyatt, 720 Cedar Ave. S.; Mr. and Mrs. W. Free, 1012 High Ave. S.; Deone & Christopher Perlatti, 1520 S. 9th Street; James Baker, 524 Mill Avenue S.; Monica and Mike Bishop, 326 Renton Ave. S.; Frank Gallagher, 719 Jones Ave. S.; John Giuliani, 1400 S. 7th St.; Dwight &Janice Potter, 2411 SE 8th Place; and Robert Lux, 1410 S. 7th St; all Renton, WA 98055.) Please respond by: Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter with memo. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare letter(s) to citizen/agency with Mayor's signature and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor approves the letter, the Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return to you for mailing.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. Call Council secretary ASAP. (Copy of response to City Clerk not required.) XX Other: Add names to parties of record list. Mail response to each party explaining the public hearing process. PLEASE REFERENCE LOG NUMBER ON ALL LETTERS. Please complete request by 3/8/00.. Thank you. cc: Mayor, Councilmembers (8), Jay Covington 40 CoCITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Lynn and Marian Thrasher 904 Grant Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Thrasher: This letter is written in response to your letter of March 5,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as long-time residents of Renton you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth. In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. It is our understanding that these procedures were followed by the school district. Another aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value.The proceeds from such sales are used for other school facilities, equipment,and programs. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record" so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Sin ,ly, 4 c:77 Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director • Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 / FAX(425)430-6523 gat_ . , Ifrdi CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Phil and Bonnie Johnson 350 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr. and Mrs. Johnson: This letter is written in response to your letter of March 8,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth. In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. It is our understanding that these procedures were followed by the school district. Another aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value.The proceeds from such sales are used for other school facilities, equipment,and programs. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Sinry, Jese Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner • - Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way -/Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 / FAX(425)430-6523 tch Thug nanor rnntainc 50%rnrvrIed matartal PM,nnct rnncumar 40 CITY OF RENTON NAL Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms. Gina Custer 1209 South 7th Street Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms. Custer: We have received your letter regarding the possible development of a residential project on Renton Hill.Thank you for conveying your concerns about issues related to this potential development. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. We would also like to clarify that no proposal has been submitted to the City nor has a land use application been received. Should such a proposal be submitted,it will be reviewed with the utmost diligence by the Development Services Department of the City. Just as citizens of our community have a right to oppose development projects,property owners have the right to propose development. Such projects must be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and zoning regulations of the City. Obviously, property owners also have the right to sell their land to others. When a private property owner applies to develop or redevelop their land,the City is obligated by law to accept and process those applications. If the development is consistent with adopted plans and codes of the City,then it must be approved. It may be approved, however,with conditions that address potential impacts to the environment. We appreciate the comments of our citizens when formulating these conditions. Government,however,cannot intercede in property owners'decisions to develop or to sell their land to developers. Also, like all school districts in the State of Washington,the Renton School District is required to follow certain procedures,set by state law,when disposing of land not needed for school facilities. It is our understanding that these procedures were followed by the school district. The proceeds from such sales are used for other school facilities,equipment,and programs. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Sinc e , (42 c70.14.4"4"---,'" Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 / FAX(425)430-6523 Cih This naner contains 50%recycled material 20%nest cnnsi imer O, `� , CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Robert Lux 1410 South 76'Street Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.Lux: We have received your letter regarding the possible development of a residential project on Renton Hill. We would like to clarify that no proposal has been submitted to the City nor has a land use application been received. Should such a proposal be submitted,it will be reviewed with the utmost diligence by the Development Services Department of the City. Just as citizens of our community have a right to oppose development projects,property owners have the right to propose development. Such projects must be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan and zoning regulations of the City. Obviously,property owners also have the right to sell their land to others. When a private property owner applies to develop or redevelop their land,the City is obligated by law to accept and process those applications. If the development is consistent with adopted plans and codes of the City,then it must be approved. It may be approved,however,with conditions that address potential impacts to the environment. We appreciate the comments of our citizens when formulating these conditions. Government,however,cannot intercede in property owners'decisions to develop or to sell their land to developers. Also,like all school districts in the State of Washington,the Renton School District is required to follow certain procedures,set by state law,when disposing of land not needed for school facilities. It is our understanding that these procedures were followed by the school district. The proceeds from such sales are used for other school facilities,equipment,and programs. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Si ely, esse Tanner Mayor % cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C -- — — --�, ',..y j Renton CityCouncilmembers '„ ` 'it:�' _ .`.t:�•-%i ' Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer ._1?r Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director . Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 (liciN Thies nanc r r,nntatrs en i rnnvriarf matorinl 9f i nnct rnnci annr 4.0 CITY OF RENTON _it% Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Mr./Mrs./Ms.Hopkins and Chambers PO Box 691 Renton,WA 98057 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr./Mrs./Ms.Hopkins and Chambers: This letter is written in response to your letter,which we received March 3,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the City. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Sin r ly, else Tanner ,, 1t Mayor y ,} cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 y CITY OF RENTON; Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Dina N. Calhoun and Robert E.Davis 433 Cedar Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Calhoun and Mr.Davis: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 25,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the City. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns.0Si;'= ely, -sse Tanner -- , Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C ",' i-.\ ;�T ��';1_1 <.‘41 F M1' Renton City Councilmembers - Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer - Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 •. v, CITY OF RENTON eel ` Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms.M.Ann Houser 2331 SE 8th Place Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Houser: This letter is written in response to your letter of March 3,2000: Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the City. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. ii Sinc-ii,4Je s� a Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer - Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director t' 1.1 r; • : .9. Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner ,'?\.v, i ''i, .-.;. r _c,_.� . Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner � - � _ ,,_ _'.r� u3 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 44, 0 CITY OF RENTON ..� Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms. Agnes Koestl 428 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Koestl: This letter is written in response to your letter of March 2,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Si ly, c7e,14-4-4"4"--.0".. esse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner ; 46, 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 �,rop-, CITY OF RENTON NAL Mayor dIMED Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Dwight and Janice Potter 2411—SE 8th Place Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Potter: This letter is written in response to your letter of March 1,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. • Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city.We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the City. As to your concerns related to geologic stability in the Renton Hill area,a geotechnical study,report,and recommendations would be a requirement of the project proposal,should one be submitted. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to.contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. iA%._ cerely, k esse Tanner Mayor • � "✓ . cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 Thie.,,.,or�n.»,cn,�n°i rnrvr•I d n,,thrc�i �n i.,.,tee�.,.,� n,or ristilk CITY OF RENTON ._ Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 John R Guiliani 1400 South 7th Street Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr. Guiliani: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 28,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Sinc; `; , 4= ....7-,,:,...._.,,,,,-- di i,' J- e Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers `.' Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer rt "� ..\. .,'i Greggimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator �-' ,r ;fit tea:; i ;;. gg �• _ , Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 •• CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Frank Gallacher 719'Jones Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.Gallacher: This is written in response to your letter,which we received March 2,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as a long-time citizen of Renton,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the City. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. i erely, esse Tanner , :,' s= Mayor y' " ITAY • cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 afzikT . ._ . CITY OF RENTON mil. � ' Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Monica and Mike Bishop 326 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Bishop: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 28,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.hi the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the City. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S. rely, C70,4%.1"4"—..,e" esse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 C741 This oaoer contains 50%recycled material.20%oost consumer CITY OF RENTON arLs: , .t„. Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22, 2000 James E. Baker 524 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr. Baker: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 25, 2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill, you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and.region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth, in 1990, the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act (GMA). As part of the GMA, the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share" of the increased regional population growth. In the City of Renton, the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993, all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record" so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S. erely, itC Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way -.Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 Thic nanar rnntaine Ffl/rors,'I d nia/nrial 7f1/nncf rnne Amur 4; , �'. CITY OF RENTON Win.;-', .A rY x-; {7! _ :, i;.;.;,:,t,...'� Mayor Jesse Tanner .tea March 22,2000 Deone and Christopher Perlatti 1520 South 9th Street Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Perlatti: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 24, 2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities ities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city.We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the City. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. �;erely, Jesse Tanner Mayor • • cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 QY]Thie nanar enntaine cm-racvclari matarial 9f1%nn t rnnm,mar a.:d' •. z+`, - , =� CITY OF RENTON . 11. u Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22, 2000 Mr.and Mrs.W.Free 1012 High Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr. and Mrs. Free: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 27,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers (Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill, you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth. In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a "party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S'a rely, i sse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 1 CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms.Diane B.Hyatt 720 Cedar Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Hyatt: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 22,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge those concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as a resident of Renton,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Si rely, esse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 [Zl TI.f.................1.....�G/fo%.nn....In.1.....1......1 nno/...... ........•...... di iv. CITY OF RENTON 4.6 FAA ' Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 1, "U Ms. Carolyn Ossorio ; "__�t� 105 Mercer Street,Apt 113 Seattle,WA 98109 t. Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Ossorio: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. As a clarification,the Renton School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. Regardless,the City shares your concern for wildlife on Renton Hill.We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that come with increasing development The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the city. As a new resident to Renton you may not be aware that there extensive areas that the City is endeavoring to preserve as open space and greenbelts. We hope displaced wildlife will find refuge in these areas. These are most notably along May Creek(the May Creek Greenway),Honey Creek(the Honey Creek Greenway),the Black River Riparian Forest,the Renton Wetlands,the Panther Creek Wetlands,and Cedar River Natural Area. We welcome you to the City of Renton,and assure you that if an application is received for this project we will review it with the utmost thoroughness. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S -rely, Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 [7R7 Mite r,ar,or rr,neacr,c an i romir•iori r.,aeor:ai 911°i..net r•.,.,c.lr„pr ► :r CITY OF RENTON „IL Mayor Jesse Tanner • March 22,2000 - Ms.Rosemary Grassi P.O.Box 1188 Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms. Grassi: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 17,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge those concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as a resident of Renton,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth. In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the city. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S. c rely, esse Tanner Mayor, cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 eili This paper contains 50%recycled material 20%oast consumer c.ro) 4 CITY OF RENTON IA Mayor _ Jesse Tanner gi4i` t j`•. ".7 , March 22,2000 „-v. §S f Ms.Dorlene Bressan 901 High Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Bressan: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 21,2000.Thank you for conveying so eloquently your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge those concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.hi addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as a resident of Renton,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.hi the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the city. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. ,i erely, 4 OF esse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 S J Thic naner contains 50%rervrlad material_90%nnct roncomer .. _; CITY OF RENTON soLL4 Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Douglas and Dena Brandt 610 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Brandt: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 19,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as long-time residents of Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. As to your suggestion that the property remain as it is,the School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Si ely, 4:7044.01444.."—,=, %...k1 ;'�;u; Y •�e�'�\\��•.J lJ�V.' •1/4•Th0-6�'-:tom:.:i esse Tanner Mayor r .x cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 113t nanor cr i rowriora rr,arorn,i 9r i •, CITY OF RENTON > Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22, 2000 Mr. John P. Burkhalter 901 Jones Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.Burkhalter: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns,apprise you of the current status of the project, and inform you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. It is our understanding that the Renton School District has not, in fact, sold the property in question. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton, is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value.Additionally, it is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. Regardless,this issue is best addressed to the Renton School District and School Board. As to your other concern,wildlife and natural areas within the city,the City shares your concern for wildlife on Renton Hill. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development. The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization. By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of, or on the edges of,the city. We assure you that if an application is received for this project we will review it with the utmost thoroughness. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a "party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S' rely, esse Tanner ;::r j;+:! '.`:, Mayor ,k-41.7 cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers • Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer • Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 ., „ CITY OF RENTON ..l< i ' Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms.Patricia A.Burkhalter 901 Jones Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Burkhalter: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. hi addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Community members of Renton Hill have made us aware of the"deer problem." We feel that the deer will slowly develop new habitats outside of the City where development densities are lower. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Si ely, . . 0 0 e-‘,.. esse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C r EF Renton City Councilmembers ::c:i•sw JayCovington,Chief Administrative Officer '; ( ` rd.)��{ '�f1'._W>+F'.' , �: J0 Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator i,' '-� g-t t.. t"f' r ,'a. k.., 6:4 ,d Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner a '`c"4,.f Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 Thic nano rnnta inc�n i ro�.�to.i n,atoriai 9n i nnm�nn� rnor ., CITY OF RENTON ..LL Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22, 2000 Ralph and Ann Carter 630 High Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr. and Mrs. Carter: This letter is written in response to your letter,which we received on February 23,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. :The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for wildlife on Renton Hill. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that come with increasing development. The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization. By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of, or on the edges of,the city. • We assure you that if an application is received for this project we will review it with the utmost thoroughness. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a "party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. 5 S. ely, 0 esse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 alThis naner contains 50%recycled material..20%noel consumer y CITY OF RENTON 4$ Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Quentin and Rena Ellis 715 High Avenue South Renton,WA 98055. Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Ellis: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 21,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. - In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. We are also aware of the potential location of former mine shafts. A thorough geotechnical engineering study would be a requirement of any application submitted to the city in that area. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. rely, Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers - } � �, �, Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner rt N,n Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 alThis oaner contains 50%recycled material.20%nnst consumer toCITY OF RENTON 4, Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms.Barbara Lux 1412 South 9t Street Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Lux: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as a long-time resident of the City,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the city. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. cerely, `esse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C ''� j + ; Fu= ''i c. L's Vie'Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 •• CITY OF RENTON tql71-01 1, t Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Rich and Cindy Yarbrough 338 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Yarbrough: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 21,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. We appreciate the creative ideas you put forth in your letter,unfortunately,the School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. 5....#rely, esse Tanner Mayor 1, r: ;, cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C f: -:,.ice':�` f i?,' .• ,'-��` '4 Renton City Councilmembers ,,:�f;�';F:rn r'>' t� — ; Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer ''JI" Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Y;. Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 CITY OF RENTON T �Y Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22, 2000 Ruth Larson Renton Hill Community Association 714 High Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mrs.Larson: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 19,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City 6f Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers (Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. We appreciate your continued leadership in the community and assure you that we have carefully reviewed the many letters received to date that express neighborhood concerns about this potential development. We have made the many letter-writers parties of record and will inform them if an application has been submitted. Thank you again for your concern. erely, dam ` Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner l' i fi •190 1055 South Grady Way Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 6R1This nanar nnntains fifl%rnnvnlnd matarial 2(1.4 nnst rnnsi imar CITY OF RENTON . .. Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms.Janet Slapnick 531 Grant Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms. Slapnick: This letter is written in response to your letter,which we received February 22,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the city. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. ncerely, • Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C `'i j Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner • 1055 South Grady Way -Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 T• CITY OF RENTON mLL Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms. Sharon Herman 711 Jones Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Herman: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. City departments,for park land acquisition and for residential planning,attempt to balance the growth of the City so that our community has both houses and open space. It is a difficult task that is becoming more so. We are committed to maintaining the quality of life for the entire community. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. 5�--rely, res se Tanner Mayor 71,s ,. cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer ` Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 Thic nannr rnntainc REV!,.rervrinrl matarial 90%nnct rnncumar •. �_- �� CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Dan and Liz Hemenway 1712 SE 7th Court Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Hemenway: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 19,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. erely, Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C •wj Renton City Councilmembers 'a• 1A , � '�� Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer ti'S:f."' Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 [mil Thic r.�ncr nnnl��nc Gflo/ren..nlcrl mo�or:ol 7110/n..��nnnc....c. _ _ CITY OF RENTON .a t,'`' Mayor 4 Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms.Paula Provin 712 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Provin: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be acconunodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on-the edges of,the city. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell.land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. 1-rely, c:-.7. esse Tanner Mayor ; _ ire.!` cc: City Clerk/Referral 1120019-C - :�t" ;b. Renton City Councilmembers 4t,\,,,,r gu: Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer �:" Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director _ Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 [3]TL.ic Honor n..nloinc Gllo/ren••nlu•d.nnfnnnl flllo%......,•.•...�....... •. �. CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms.Patricia Gilroy 535 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms. Gilroy: This letter is written in response to your letter,which we received on February 22,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as a long-time resident of Renton,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. -rely, ,, Ejli4 wd\7 '41 ' 7 r.,{, , :rift`1 it.:s'_`;,c' �y�ig,F:� F ' ' Jesse Tanner `�''"`" " 4 Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 .. . '' ,, CITY OF RENTON ..u. i,. k . Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Mr.Bert H. Custer 714 Cedar Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr. Custer: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 16,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. City zoning regulations favor this type of development. The property you have referred to on Renton Hill has been zoned Single Family Residential for many years. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Si; ely, l if, / , esse Tanner ` ,,,,, ,,:-.4-, ,, \'-- ' , taY 7"'" Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 CITY OF RENTON Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Dwayne and Nancy Liston 17703—'114t Place SE Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Liston: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 17,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as long-time residents of Renton,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.City zoning regulations favor this type of development. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. erely, Jesse Tanner Mayor t, _ cs`s cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C , = 'k,.,,'.;; - Renton City Councilmembers V' ' Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator - Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 6RiThic naner,nnntainc 60%rarvrlarl matarial 9r%nnct rnnei,mnr •. CITY OF RENTON ••LL Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms. Carol Collins 420 Cedar Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Collins: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 17,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. You are undoubtedly aware of increased development throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. cerely, c7:4,"•.07"4"---01/ Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C _ Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer a ':y; �`•. _ ., Gregg Zimmerman P/B/PW Administrator _•s ,' " F `y Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner • • 1055 South Grady Way- Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 { CITY OF RENTON t. Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Ms.Ruth Bradley 709 High Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Bradley: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. • The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as a long-time resident you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,-the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth. In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. City zoning regulations favor this type of development. The property you have referred to on Renton Hill has been zoned Single Family Residential for many years. We are also aware of the potential location of former mine shafts. A thorough geotechnical engineering study would be a requirement of any application submitted to the city in that area. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. It is our understanding that the school district followed required procedures for notification of the sale of this property. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. erely, Jesse Tanner Mayor a _ t-', cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C 1.2:'j • .: r °'�= Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director • Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 rZl TL.:.................fin.....Gnot.nn•...Inr!.nnln..nl 710/_nncl nnnc:mn• 4i a CITY OF RENTON MIL Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Mr.Mario H.Tonda Mr.Victor J.Tonda 1308 Beacon Way South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.Mario Tonda and Mr.Victor Tonda: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill.In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,as long-time residents of Renton,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA).As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth. In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. cerely, ti ir Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 % CITY OF RENTON ••� Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22, 2000 Ms. Cheryl Danza 706 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Ms.Danza: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. In 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). An aspect of the GMA is that the population growth must remain within city limits, in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city.We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization. By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of, or on the edges of,the city. The School District,which is a separate entity from the City of Renton, is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. One aspect of the law is that the land must be sold for at least ninety percent of the market value. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a • "party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. 4,cerely, Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner ZI'A v`wy'l,ps.':•};� j is`' tr' $ate"ri • A_t9i 1055 South Grady Way- Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 et CITY OF RENTON mu. .4. Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Mr.Ken Adams 706 Renton Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.Adams: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 18,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be acconunodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. You mentioned the need for a"skateboard park"in the City. You may be interested to know that the Renton Park Department is currently working on plans for just such a facility for the youth of our City. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you.wish to discuss this or have further concerns. erely, esse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner "i `i-7 21w 1055 South Grady Way - Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 Gam)This caner contains 50%recycled material.20%nest consumer ;; CITY OF RENTON y � � Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Mr.Barton Bennett 1807 SE 7th Court Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.Bennett: This letter is written in response to your letter,which we received on February 21,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share" of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city. We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the city. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S.,- ,-rely, 4: esse Tanner r:A;2, Mayor `: ;r ,-,,,.-. „ `�t3.a r.= .: r: o.+ s4 )'fo' `firr41..;rr. t. 'a cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers k Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer o, , Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director , Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 •• CITY OF RENTON ` Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22, 2000 Mr. Bill Collins 420 Cedar Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr. Collins: This letter is written in response to your letter,which we received on February 21,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers (Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. An aspect of the Growth Management Act is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits, in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city.We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization. By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the city. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a "party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S. erely, c7:214%,e-t." Jesse Tanner Mayor 1 } �1 ^a1 i•'.-, y��•_ ilk•' T �.+` cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C , Renton City Councilmembers s ., Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman;P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 ��. CITY OF RENTON ••LL _ Mayor oloo Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Michael and Cynthia Mack 906 High Avenue South Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs.Mack: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 17,2000.Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill.The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes.In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city.We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of, or on the edges of,the city. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. Si ely, esse Tanner �+ r� �y t; %6�3 ,', Mayor r cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 ,p.. CITY OF RENTON P " Mayor Jesse Tanner March 22,2000 Barry and Pat Conger 1301 South 9th Street Renton,WA 98055 Re: Development on Renton Hill Dear Mr.and Mrs. Conger: This letter is written in response to your letter of February 17,2000. Thank you for conveying your concerns about the potential development of a ten acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. The City shares your concern for traffic circulation and vehicle/pedestrian safety on Renton Hill. The City of Renton Engineering Plan Review Division and Public Works Departments have already discussed this issue and will continue to do so. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)would also be involved in review of any proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each city and county was told how much of that growth they would be expected to accommodate. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth.In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. In 1993,all properties in the City were rezoned to implement the twenty year Comprehensive Plan under the GMA. Another aspect of the GMA is that the projected population growth must remain within city limits,in order to preserve our forest and agricultural lands that lay beyond the city.We are aware of the pressure on wildlife that comes with increasing development.The reality is that some wildlife adapts more readily to urbanization.By concentrating the growth within the city,the hope is to provide greater opportunities for wildlife to develop habitats outside of,or on the edges of,the City. We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a"party of record"so you will be notified if an application for this project is submitted to the City. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner,at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. 4 erely, .01 Jesse Tanner Mayor cc: City Clerk/Referrai o019 c 1 Renton City Councilmembers ;!i1 •, i�- ;:? ??':,� „ t'� _ Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer :;j r3 `t Gregg Zimmerman,PB/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director - ` Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 °} CITY OF RENTON ..LL ` Mayor Jesse Tanner CITY OF RENTON . • MAR 2 3 2000 RECEIVEOFFICE Gmt CLERK S March 23, 2000 Dolores J. Gibbons, Ed.D. Superintendent,Renton School District 403 300 SW 7th St Renton,WA 98055-2307 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT ON RENTON HILL Dear Dr. Gibbons: Enclosed for your files are copies of the City's letters to the Renton Hill residents regarding the potential development of a ten-acre parcel located on Renton Hill. Sincerely, !n Marg Pullar Execu ive Secretary to the Mayor cc: City_C1erk Marilyn Petersen • 1055 South Grady Way - Renton, Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500 /FAX(425)430-6523 ::e This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer •► CITY OF RENTON cMc, ..at { ' Mayor Jesse Tanner 4-14-itta L/ May 8,2000 Ms. Josephine M.Potter 1314 South 7th Street Renton,WA 98055-3065 Re: Development on Renton Hill, Dear Ms.Potter: This letter is written in response to your letter of concern to the City Council and directed to my attention. Thank you for conveying these concerns about the potential development of a ten-acre property located on Renton Hill. The purpose of this response is to acknowledge your concerns and to apprise you of the opportunities you will have to provide additional comments. First, allow me to address your comment regarding the sale of the land. The Renton School District, which is a separate entity from the City of Renton,is regulated by state law(Revised Code of Washington 28A.335.120)to follow set procedures to sell land not needed for school use. In early 1997,the District declared the property as surplus. Notice of intent to sell the property was published in the South County Journal in April 1997. In January 1999,the property was listed with a real estate sales company,who then solicited bids. A purchase and sale agreement was negotiated with the highest bidder in March 1999. All of the actions taken by the School Board occurred during open public session. Regarding the traffic situation,the City shares your concern for vehicle/pedestrian safety and circulation on Renton Hill. A traffic study was required of the applicant as part of the project proposal. This is being reviewed by Transportation Services and Engineering Plan Review staff. The Emergency Services providers(Police Department and Fire Prevention Bureau)will also be involved in review of proposed plans submitted to the City. In addition to traffic problems particular to Renton Hill,you are undoubtedly aware of increased traffic volumes throughout the City and region. This is partly the result of an increase in population in the Puget Sound area that exceeds growth during the same period in other parts of the United States. In order to cope with this growth,in 1990,the State of Washington passed the Growth Management Act(GMA). As part of the GMA,the population growth for the Puget Sound area was estimated for twenty years into the future. Each jurisdiction has an obligation to provide housing for their"fair share"of the increased regional population growth. In the City of Renton,the belief is that the quality of life will be better if this new growth can be accommodated in single family homes. The Renton Hill property being proposed for new development has been zoned for single family residential homes. ,", 1055 South Grady Way - Renton,Washington 98055 - (425)430-6500/FAX(425)430-6523 .ca- --- . . . • Y Ms. Josephine Potter 1314 South 7th Street Renton,WA 98055-3065 We do appreciate your concern for Renton and the residents of Renton Hill. Your letter has made you a "party of record"for the project. You should have received a Notice of Application for the proposal . currently being reviewed by the City. Comments on the proposal are being accepted until May 19,2000. Please feel free to contact Elizabeth Higgins, Senior Planner, at(425)430-7382 should you wish to discuss this or have further concerns. S erely, CITY OF RENTON esse Tanner MAY 1 0 200Q Mayor RECEIVED cc: City Clerk/Referral#20019-C2 Ca7Y CLERK'S OFFICE Renton City Councilmembers Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Gregg Zimmerman,P/B/PW Administrator Jana Hanson,Development Services Director Jennifer Henning,Principal Planner Elizabeth Higgins,Senior Planner RECEIVED DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1 CITY OF RENTON MAR 7 2000 MARS 2U )UNCIL REFERRAL TO ADMINISTRATION CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. RECEIVED TO: Gregg Zimmerman DATE: 03/16/00 FROM: Marilyn Petersen LOG#: 20019-C On 3/15/00, Council received and referred the following: Letter from Josephine Potter, 1314 S. 7`'' Street, Renton,WA 98055, opposes proposed Bennett development on Renton Hill. Please respond by: Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor. (After Mayor's approval, Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare memo to Councilmembers via Mayor and include attached letter with memo. (After Mayor's approval,Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return copy to you.) Prepare letter(s) to citizen/agency with Mayor's signature and submit to Mayor for approval. (After Mayor approves the letter, the Mayor's secretary will copy for Council and Clerk and return to you for mailing.) Schedule matter on Council committee agenda. Call Council secretary ASAP. (Copy of response to City Clerk not required.) XX Other: Please write to parties of record and explain the public input process. Please provide copy to City Clerk. PLEASE REFERENCE L• dr► .ER ON ALL LETTERS. Please complete request° y 3/20/00. Thank ank you. (Yr1 . Mayor, Councilmembers, Jay C. c_r- CITY OF RENTON MAR 1 5 2000 RECEIVED ^ / CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Cret4,- .e-e/eLvf- es0( _ ;ef7?- ty,eel e.afX/ d e cfei,e."/Pei i 4,- -ge. ir 1 , \ 01 ' 111 ' 1 .111011-ii Nt ‘ ! , . i- k , iNritt \ 0 ithi 1 it\f_Kilp 1) M1,1 n \\\, 11 r--bit I /-a-32-J2w d22;av • J3°1 g7 P4V-222-5i29.?2?,7 --• •V .d7f76- )45V --V2°UV1 LcZ /R27-,Z_D -7rV324 / 227 - d 1 7Z?a?2 /17,121 • er ICI Renton School District 403 dTy 4 T~ 300 Southwest 7th Street,Renton, Washington 98055-2307 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT c►ry of R ENTQN. March 2, 2000 MAR 0 8 Z000 CIN 8/Rff SEpFFfCE Ken Adams 706 Renton Avenue South • Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Adams: Thank you for your letter regarding the sale of the Renton School District property on Renton Hill. I understand your desire to have the property remain in the current natural state and your apprehension over additional traffic and infrastructure concerns. As cities grow and mature, questions of preservation, compliance with the Growth Management Act, and individual citizen preferences sometimes collide. I thought perhaps a review of the school district's actions would be informative. All school board meetings are open to the public and are posted as to time and date in the local papers. Meetings are generally held on the second and fourth Wednesday of the month at the Kohlwes Education Center at 300 SW 7th Street at 7:00 p.m. All of the following board actions were taken in open public session: 1 /22/97 Board declared proposal to sell several parcels of ;surplus property. 3/26/97 Notice of intent to sell the property was published in the 4/2/97 South County Journal (twice) 4/9/97 Board held public hearing on the proposal to sell surplus property 5/28/97 Board declared property.surplus 1 0/1 /98 Request for proposal for real estate advisor issued 1 /7/99 District entered into exclusive sales listing^agrgement with Colliers International F;;1. - • Page 1 Kohlwes Education Center 1 /27/99 Colliers sent solicitations for bids on property 3/24/99 Purchase and sale agreement negotiated with highest bidder. Feasibility studies are in progress that may modestly adjust the price depending on density. • The school district operates under a complex set of laws, policies, and the • State Constitution regarding property. As you can see from the list above, actions to declare and sell surplus property are tightly regulated. The laws regulating the use of proceeds from the sale of property. dictate that the dollars be placed in the capital projects fund. A section of the Constitution of the State of Washington applies to school district property that prohibits the district from making a "gift". Article VIII, Paragraph 7 states no county, city, town or other municipal corporation (such as school districts) shall hereafter give any money or property or loan its money or credit to or in aid of any individual association company, or corporation. Additional state laws govern the conveyance and acquisition of property as well as the management and appraisal of property. Other laws regulate the sale of real property and the use of proceeds. I. believe we have met the letter and spirit of the laws and the State Constitution. The District currently has a legal obligation to honor the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Bennett Development. They are working through their feasibility study. The jurisdiction of the school district does not include questions of environmental impact, density, roads, traffic or compliance with the Growth Management Act. Those functions belong to the City of Renton. It is. my understanding representatives of the Renton Hill Community Association are in regular contact with city officials regarding this property. The Renton School District provides educational services to 12,500 students. As stewards of precious tax dollars, it is our responsibility to plan and manage resources to the highest benefit for the children we are serving. Page 2 I would be happy to meet with a delegation of the Renton Hills Community Association to discuss details of the school district's actions or any other ideas you wish to share. Sincerely, /6)-41-(t-z. 1(--:4-4-(A'`/1 Dolores J. Gibbons, Ed.D. Superintendent DJG:n c Board of Directors Mayor Tanner Renton City Council ✓ Page 3 • CITY OF RENTON . m• . to ENVIRONMENTAL AN L , i ro • HEARING E J►AMT V ER • REVIEW PROCESS Hearing Examiner Total Processing • 0 • Notice of Time Approximately Application, 12 weeks I Optional DNS'` Environmental I and Tentative Public Decision • ` Public Hearing Comment Published - _n :,,. Receipt of Period Ends Mailed and Appeal Hearing -c c_r Date Mailed and PP -c e Application Posted Threshold Posted Period Ends Examiner r_, Determination Public n Prepare Decision Appeal Ys,`.: Staff Appeal Hearing Appeal Period m a Report Period Period Ends `i , 0 O O 0 ,..!, • Approx. • ; :.`'' : 5 Days 14 Days Approx. 6 Days ** IO Working 5 Days y 14 Days 8-15 Days Days g 14 Days y i;..s • City staff or other agencies may request If the applicant is also ** The State Environmental additional information during the seeking a Variance that Policy Act requires the 15 Ife eke applicant is also • review and decision making process. It requires a decision from the day comment period and.14 seeking a Shoreline Permit is important that the applicant submitwhich requires review by the the requested material quickly to avoid Board of Adjustment the day appeal period to run Department of Ecology,the �'; process time may increase by separately for complex or process time may increase by 1, delays in the process. Any time spent approximately 30 days. contentious projects. L4 gathering data and/or additional city approximately 40 days. 0 review period is not included in the _� r_,I above chart and will increase the time required to process the application. 0 r m • m K' Ale_irra d9.90D2r04 A'95 •For projects not requiring an environmental impact statement cOoot fin' Renton School District 403 n dt 1T 300 Southwest 7th Street,Renton, Washington 98055-2307 403 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT March 15, 2000 Gina M. Custer 1209 South 7th Street Renton, Washington 98055-3068 Dear Ms. Custer: Thank you for your letter regarding the sale of the Renton. School District property on Renton Hill. I understand your desire to have the property remain in the current natural state and your apprehension over additional traffic and infrastructure concerns. As cities grow and mature, questions of preservation, compliance with the Growth Management Act, and individual citizen preferences sometimes collide. I thought perhaps a review of the school district's actions would be informative. All school board meetings are open to the public and are posted as to time and date in the local papers. Meetings are generally held on the second and fourth Wednesday of the month at the Kohlwes Education Center at 300 SW 7th Street at 7:00 p.m. All of the following board actions were taken in open public session: 1 /22/97 Board declared proposal to sell several parcels of surplus property 3/26/97 Notice of intent to sell the property was published in the 4/2/97 South County Journal (twice) 4/9/97 Board held public hearing on the proposal to sell surplus property • 5/28/97 Board declared property surplus 1 0/1 /98 Request for proposal for real estate advisor issued 1 /7/99 District entered into exclusive sales listing agreement with Colliers International Page 1 Kohlwes Education Center • • • • I would be happy to meet with a delegation of the Renton Hills Community Association to discuss details of the school district's actions or any other ideas you wish to share. Sincerely, Dolores J. Gib ons, Ed.D. Superintendent DJG:n c Board of Directors Mayor Tanner Renton City Council:. • Page3 • CITY OF RENTON • • -n m m ENVIRONMENTAL ENTAL AND r.1 HEARING EXAMINER r REVIEW PROCESS Hearing Examiner , Total Processing • Notice of Time Approximately Application, 12 weeks • I Optional DNS* Environmental and Tentative Public Decision • Public Hearing Comment Published n Receipt of Date Mailed and Period Ends Mailed and Appeal Hearing - Application Threshold Posted period Ends Examiner Cl Posted Determination Public Appeal m Prepare bearing Decision period Staff • Appeal Report � Period PeriodAppeal Ends Period 0 -o o 0 , 0 0 0 0 . 0 Approx. • 5 Days 14 Days Approx.5 Dam 6 Days 14 Days** 8-15 Days D working 14 Days Y • • City staff or other agencies may request If the applicant is also ** The State Environmental If additional information during the seeking a Variance that Policy Act requires the 15 seekinge applicant is also r• eview and decision making process. It a Shoreline Permit requires a decision from the day comment period and,14 which requires is important that the applicant submit Board of Adjustment the day review by the th$requested material quicklyto avoid � appeal Period to run Department of Ecology,the r process time may increase by separately for complex or process time may increase by delays in the process. Any time spent approximately 30 days. contentious projects. IM ' gathering data and/or additional city approximately 40 days. review period is not included in the _, above chart and will increase the time 6 r required to process the application. G -I �J D CI rikirrirna"SVO26114Crien •For projects net requiring an environmental impact statement -� r - . .-r Renton School District - Superintendent's Response Regarding Renton Hill Property (mailed March 2, 2000) Last Name First Name Address City Adams Ken 706 Renton Ave S Renton, WA 98055 • Baker James E. 524 Mill Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Bennett . 'Barton 1807 SE 7th Court Renton, WA 98055-3954 Bradley ,Ruth H. 709 High Ave S Renton, WA 98055-3917 Brandt `Douglas & Dena 610 Renton Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Bressan Dorlene 901 High Ave S Renton; WA 98055 Burkhalter John P. 901 Jones Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Burkhalter Patricia A. 901 Jones Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Carter I Ann & Ralph 630 High Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Collins Carol 420 Cedar Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Conger Barry & Pat 1301 S 9th St :„Renton, WA 98055 Custer !Bert H. 714 Cedar Ave S Renton, WA 98055 • 4 .- Danza Cheryl 706 Renton Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Ellis Quentin & Rena 715 High Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Free Mr & Mrs W. 1012 High Ave S Renton, WA 98055 . Gilroy Patricia 535 Renton Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Grassi [Rosemary PO Box 1188 • Renton, WA 98057 Herman Sharon 711 Jones Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Hyatt Diane B. 720 Cedar Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Larson !Ruth 714 High Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Liston Dwayne & Nancy 17703 114th PI SE Renton, WA 98055-6581 Lux 'Barbara 1412 S 9th St Renton, WA 98055 Lux Robert 1410 S 7th St Renton, WA 98055 Mack Michael & Cynthia 906 High Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Ossorio Carol 105 Mercer St, Apt 113 Seattle, WA 98109 _Perlatti 'Deone & Christopher v.1520 S 9th St Renton, WA 98055 . Provin PaUla 712 Renton Ave S Renton, WA 98055 Slapnick Janet 531 Grant Ave S -Renton, WA 98055 Tonda ,Mario H. & Victor J. 1308 Beacon Way S Renton, WA 98055 Yarbrough 'Rich & Cindy 338 Renton Ave S Renton, WA 98055 1" William G.&C.L.Collins . i. (--7-'''' 420 Cedar Avenue S. I -- 1 v.'l° tliN Renton,WA 98055-3047 . Li../ D t 1 ',/' c,"....i r„,,----=-- --,, •• ..,„._ z ::::' 3 I e...)\,.. ..........-1. i c77-'" q., (-.• r::-.'..•' . ., ..,. ...- ..-'1/....7 r..-, . t, ......" 5p.. 6•_„..tz4 iat,7 ,f, „,, ,,,.....,...,....... . r.. 1 4,fe.1171-e 17 •,,,,,:i r., ';:',,,;.• --37-::' e.A\ 60k, . , . , A71:/•:7 „..t. ":733-47:4:17-. 'tr.?' ' niltilithlititildulihstiliiiiiiiilltifliftliffililtii1111 ' • ‘ CITY OF RENTON O C T 1 32000 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works RECEIVED MEMORANDUM crry CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: October 13, 2000 TO: City of Renton Clerk FROM: Elizabeth Higgins; 7382 SUBJECT: Renton Hill Petition I received the attached petition from Rosemary Grassi on October 12, 2000. Although it is undated I believe the signatures predate the submittal of a land use action request by the developer referred to in the petition. The reason I believe this is because the Mayor's office had an inquiry as to the response the City would give to the petition, but at that time we could not locate the petition as it was described to us. Margaret Peterson and I (and many others, including the Clerk's office staff) searched for it. Also, the signatures on page 3 are dated 2/16/00. The reason I mention this is because the project has changed between the time it was submitted in May and when requested revisions were received by the Development Services Division in September. The "gate openings" referred to in the petition are no longer being proposed as part of the project. Whether the development should occur at all (the other issue) will be decided following the public hearing on November 14, 2000. ram; /• _ ALi `r 1,-, ( M , v 6 t- (,�J`�-,.A:..`'.-';1 ,, n, •••'""' Fib' ..6k - rt ',��.42 , ' v • 1 a ff • V e t _ \,i /�F�S lih .eF� yr P : r, ' ` v ,. To: His Honor, Jesse Tanner, Mayor of Renton w Members of the Renton City Council o 73,71 � � cp n Subject: Bennett Homes Development of Approximately < E* Ten Acres of Property Located Across from ! 4 LiZ Philip Arnold Park on Renton Hill This is to state our opposition to the proposed -development and ' gate openings. r.;, fr I ,71 NAME ADDRESS Coo &n1N7 A v,E, S, ,..: O -T- Ovn 'p� Sf° l gffA e- S. ifyJy ZAJO �-� $vt 11-U .ff1 Sa, ()�LL_ 50 I C eh.. G( ¢ S .bra v eirri7L,16,4 I s I I Crunes i o , /57/ &, Gj -'f - . -� 4\i A--)01y\i\f\u , Lin C9�.9c' Xlii-L- Vi �J i s </ I t rc , , i.4 Gt/ a C/ (2AX/Lc .- cv,v -elm Ii fl . 7 / �:� � 7 / /62./ 05�ze_zk IA JL�- 0 c r E/Z cI ii 1) S gr4 A Ae ( IJLe.ow) R,p ) M C E-r/&2L- vs 4E' y j .4v Se . AAA' z vAJ 933 C.'6-6Ae -vim-SO Igoe �T V,s 1.33 2b1472, A-vsd'o. 3nefi Frc tL� 42(p Cccddr ave So. a-)- A .ern 4260 C.odar ave S, . -512t AN BECl<H AJ1 435 Cecieur Are So , E \ Z e-4-1n Psc3t s CR cQ F A�v� , t CA.rk _OILI' ,Cc- • • To: His Honor, Jesse Tanner, Mayor of Renton Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Bennett Homes Development of Approximately Ten Acres of Property Located Across from Philip Arnold Park on Renton Hill • This is to state our opposition to the proposed 'development and gate openings. NAME ADDRESS c., ,e;•/ - a_FA-te-e et_C.7. RCS CL.,f G P 96,c ,) 7/14 .2-74"--- o rimik/epr_ 6 b3z 6eker AvE 67zec-ira/ •' avkil-t, (vot< (9-#4 1117-7."91/C- 50- f )0 V"\ _ J _S" I < fct_ e-t 614/P1/.9.e Vke.03C,t. 70(e aitil-vw Ate. -- • • To: His Honor, Jesse.Tanner, Mayor of Renton • Members of the - . e Renton City Council - Subject: Bennett Homes Development of Approximately Ten Acres of Property Located Across from Philip Arnold Park on Renton Hill This is to state our opposition to the proposed .development and gate openings. NAME ADDRESS Pea sE • Ca ,- vi. ;4 21/U 5 F +" Pe_ k e,471-4 v) , tt-M 4,40 2 Pl JC__ iw o /E/ . -66 �..� ;v ,111111 r '. .S • ' To: His Honor, Jesse Tanner, Mayor of Renton • Members of the Renton City Council " -'''-- • ". "" ` ! _ Subject: Bennett Homes Development of Approximately Ten Acres of Property Located Across from Philip Arnold Park on Renton Hill This is to state our opposition to the proposed -development and gate openings. NAME ADDRESS ---4)..... •-.ram f -3 4,ki S'\,,,Ii .''.:1- e)V i_A,\A-,..... \\41,1,14, 1,- ,\S") 4/:),/fel t rVn/rr,("' -1.71- 5,77 Ardt)-7.7 jsi\e 'c .. ..114'llin"1,,, /11," KLA,,r. 5 7 7 "ve,../271i 4:s,40,..2.4 iese.etiii j- Alipi,72s-0,4 4-210, ,r)11-e- /Ivo- r y r ramie •°' C; ,x J 1e .,r�1',1.,.... GiQ /^ M J11.1 f" ( r /r- cc r C4,4- ? 1 Lt C e ai c 1 Av e . . 4' METh# - 5_.2- a- .,l.4- 4v65 . ��A- gtb-S-r- c-,5 ‘e p ,_4/ 5-ey../ ,moo 0/\.e _, yel�.a s . la.Q,,'{a•a.- -.,ur,— - ► - rein-1-0,n ,/- 5 . 'P..er►-fin `'l$055- r Aem 't d�b 7 .T� CT. -i �;:`� 7/8 , ,eve 8 9issS- .dx -_ - I .3 S 6 el-Li ) , etza-Al-ti bei P 6L7 Yit -4 . �. 1 _ VIA Tits i ttv.irt S4--CA- a yot-cs b (Oao ? A1\t A 5. �1 ,i 9 - C -celeiP e v� 1� /Ll DL 31 �4a¢9L RI;117 6/2/40-0,5 10 1 ' S- I7W i L \\ To:, His Honor, Jesse Tanner, Mayor of Renton , Members of the Renton City Council =i, : �i'_& ;^Y'_ L Subject: Bennett Homes Development of Approximately Ten Acres of Property Located Across from Philip Arnold Park on Renton Hill This is to state our opposition to the proposed development and gate openings. NAME AD SS ioAibei 0 9i �l1 111,1„il-111)-e- AO V\qAk,-"\--v-s4 ct*4 KO g A tV\16; \-- c-f---Nro q rx0 (-41,t,v-1 Ho-7 � 1, S � � a2�ra /64 A - v.� 7/ 7 c,�S 7 j �. Pet- 0 4-vom ,,., e� (5 13 56 i >I (c. °)-r pilot (,ci e di, 3i0 -, e s . Rez1 j0-0)-4 .1*0-'6(7 15 1'7 So loth ST R ENToI. (.- ri--,--(. (Aiejal 3/V , o�Je. S.— ,' 5 and iA-j,/41 Le `� Z(lS - Ce�av&ve_.5. :7," 4 JA i6 S , 10616T_ fvita00 -1. .'-....;,,..: 4 72 4;eggie.:e1,4d- 3.0D ks-nt":), Alec_ S r .a 11 A_04.4 3169 0Q-014jr/V141ee , ROM 05'il\ la hrSn✓I, ( b Rennin 4v s PP" o1r2 i 7 2'1 SE 7hcr .c( -o (/ __, y r.) Ma 3 Z (f 1+ .ire . S. lei-&,/ • . ,,,,rd, r. el_i--z _, '4/1e a_e:ee-4-7 r /6///age r ) v'0 Gn u of or 5 n K 7,P6 ,a--'a .1-S et 115o ( s g 1 - a VOC-5 m/ 57 �f — 172••�1 Sc 7Til OT RE J ouA-) /.$'pS- To: His Honor, Jesse Tanner, Mayor of Renton . `-' ` Members of the Renton City Council Subject: Bennett Homes Development of Approximately Ten Acres of Property Located Across from Philip Arnold Park on Renton Hill This is to state our opposition to the proposed development and gate openings. NAME ADDRESS , 6 z2 67 P03 o of Q,us irnaze ' -5-S2 ffii,417z-A/ kif Jo • aLii.--,.„7 cg-.2.)-:, - ✓e 51 A ii°4-),e_k 53/ C;`.0,V-'r ,f S %U---'-: . - s C• /2 0.7-/VT /91./ S' •/2c,,,v/V ie-ei- _ 42-,,Al C , R,'c 6Di( 6el04/i 14-u -lc ��i -J7 31-tPC_. 'C . S . �o:� 6v � S. d vv A✓� 11'1M IG�q ' ' S32 6roil- 4 r' S. ,lerrivki V lm PI th/1 5-3 2- GYfil4- - S + fell 4k 1- a-c--/ 61 v, 6Aii1- A-Li, S �y .1 n c C_ • 9 .y 2_Grit,(1- - , .5 P f>ri Ce----,t,-- c,-14--tvi..ez-s-u/. .,c,5-5,b2.,L2--Pa a:ce , 4/) . -e/IN-hivitk.,k-5= l /5SO 9 at -9--, ,6-24. -- ,----- --Lie r /�Yd�!�.,� ?/% —EGG,` j,e4.4 I /f�-�t eiv, - c,f, it_ 'IA Xva.9--__p,t, 6 ` ) f ,(f ( 4', � � - • • • To: His Honor, Jesse Tanner, Mayor of Renton Members of the Renton City Council ; Subject: Bennett Homes Development of Approximately Ten Acres of Property Located Across from Philip Arnold Park on Renton Hill This is to state our opposition to the proposed development and gate openings. NAME ADDRESS bp *1t 2 Se) 11/4AVVILIWWW001 - 1'''1taivq-ol* ._124.77 m der ,��,, Z? ,q VIAM inn On vilvk '13 1P NI RECk -it1\M '+35 CEDA42Ave So 6.<4; ,3e .►►- 7 Ave „cIv'< , -751A5 . /yra2 sue, 9 5 �/ � r , ram � 1 ja / ,� ,��i a /34 �,vuk 1�cvd et? lv.7 50 A'��. ixcatkJA y . 670 ,�F,.> o,.) 4'c. S ,eeak Gtiogs'i 6 .2_1 /--11 /12e fe 5 4 I1kikik 5".32 - , 141 7� NA (�4L1hZ/Al 3 (' zb��24�S' , To: His Honor, Jesse Tanner, Mayor of Renton Members of the RentonCity - _Council ` ` �J � ;_.�,,, Subject: Bennett Homes Development of Approximately Ten Acres of Property Located Across from Philip Arnold Park on Renton Hill This is to state our opposition to the proposed development and gate openings. NAME ADDRESS - te,t,,,_,, 5.6", R- PrIZ-7 .. (.4'1' Ze ifyi) -4 I c ]-) tr AGe ,® f ?AS / , A .rkG) Vi/ N /0 S Pico S /s2-o S .9 V1-- ( bu a...A_ 04.../4.40,....Q._ , y , 3 S___7 7°4: 5 / "r) —'1 11 I -D-Ty-1,-_ AL S .� )'C)---1 /, /s 73 '27"--11-..�5=k /, ,,.e. :: ,. .,.c"' Y, .�' '` ,C74' .-), F ,": f / 2 • ' „fri-, 4 -.. --eL.-:L.-rJ-‘,t '70 9 ki4t ; / rt., ,,_7-e �� &4,4S Q IJ td ( et ,,•'';. 1, y- ,, � ii 7 i ' J - - e- -sy j.�� . �i -sue E Cu 7 / j f. . ,' Ie ry 0044.7. i 'S'--/ s ? 771 AA Ca l 3--1 s / m -7 eiA N 10 thi -s-- i Z i._4-6.L 74 e_ ,C , � GS wEAD 4- go c ri►.0i 4uc S . ,._,/, ei,4e.--x_e-0) 2t,,,..,---c-/ , / 7 003-6,---C E. 1.}.75A (77f.-- 9 '-‘,4 '\c"-- _k0 t 0 52s a •' i. - P A , 74,5 �r A R4 ht A A-? 10 Bg• cam! ahayi a tliterrialgragagliENR____ __ , SZS 1 L. 1 v� Sc, *e vvt r. .031211W .DSO 77Z lat. "lift So W-A. �iCi • . )00c) AUC s _ R‘a__ .027) qZVS s • Renton School District - Superintendent's Response Regarding Renton Hill Property • (mailed March 16, 2000) Last Name First Name Address City Thrasher Lynn & Marian 904 Grant Ave S ' Renton WA 98055 Johnson Phil & Bonnie 350 Renton Ave S Renton WA 98055-3016 Custer Gina M. 1209 S 7th St Renton WA 98055-3068 .:t1 ..� ;�r •a,Ad 11 5: r _ _ .�.."., Yes._ i .3'-; [Q:IMRSIDIDATAIRENTON 3.SIDJ Scale 1:4728.132 .., .. , .4 ' / tk.: 1...•••it'e ' 4.1110. L AP 0 c • _ . ........ ,„, . , 1 . #r ti . • �•• , `�' �,' + �+� _ •• a *.k ►' * t N. .1. :ek^\ S►, / Pat/ : ' e . '?. 412.. „`V,,t. "',� ` ' 'sr 7A�.� ' �~ "j• y 1 N fb4r �' 440 */ `,i* }dej►j f1,,_ 4 4 •*. f - • 7 ITT tit y ,� t , iZt• t r 1lf• f 'r t t s I,' . irilif/ifetif * Sici/2/ - . 4 ..,...1,, Illef t , ,.... 1,,,, ,. tfiff ,� {} , 1• !:4 1r ^.� .�. �� r,3 c', ,, ko _� �� '".-,, .J im, _ t it„34i4, ,, 44, ,,A, ' ty. . . .'7:::,.st,_:. ,rf r" t ' 1,.. . f. . 7, -It olobe-wia7t, 1 8,1ililAt. 1, - , ktz it, % • •.. I top , i ,4 • 4,`‘ •%'''.4 ..- r. ..,r.i. A 1. , -1, -,:),„ P-*„..41" jok N 4-71, .--1 .; , t,v .„, . , , ,.. 1:s, , i...*, ;,..,. * ,i„.4, -4C. X , 4,,,,,I. . ,, ,, ..., . ,.. L, /, IL --, ri a ,... 0, , iii . 4 a. . - 0, ,v,:t. + ,9,. ...., 44 , i ..-,•,„,,, , ,,,N,:r ,, of. - . !..' i 411P/ ' l'y i ft; ,., .4 4likditil „kn 'e ' .. Age - - L 3 Lc -- 1, iii. sti? #1 i 'b' , 4iIrk % - i',''', 7,„: -, f... -• - ."1. ,- - , ., " N iJI"4/4 N'Cl, 21/ MrSID Viewer Average Weekday Traffic Volumes EX/1 0 41/474-- * ' , (North & South Directions) 4, RENTON AVENUE SOUTH 90 % Chart Estimated 90 % of 544 new trips _ --- ' :,. .--,-•-••:,,"/;-\ 7..•7- 1 7 7 -...'11 =490 Trips on Renton Ave per day ',,,!`o -.,-, ';''1••,/...',','i vp.,,,,,. .: ,......,; Source of , . Upper Graph: Est. Increase in Traffic (trips) . based on 57 homes, times 9.55 trips per day. (Per City of Renton Determination of Non-Significance(Mitigated) . Miti!ation Measures • I I •/30 II,I - .sE.. • • I C • , . . 11 A . : 1 ,, ill I bc7c) 11 I . K cio I 4 If go 1 5 E3.0 P 1° IIII III kill 111111111111111i K 0 - trip Fla I-1 b 1 II i, 1 , 0 g I AA 11111-Gol 11 lig Jr • clip:1 III i_ .2, T cm sil • II, /0 1! i T . fi sun Su R nt• • e C 2i 01 Ju II arOP / 2 3 4' C 7 8 /0 / /..t /3 oili /5° i'a /7 AS /7..2o / .7..?"3 ,4 itkogs MI< PAY — 1 6 PM Average Weekday Tneric Volumes (North & South Directions) CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH 10 % Chart Estimated 10 % of 544 new trips =54 Trips on Renton Ave per day Source of Upper Graph: Est.Increase in Traffic (trips) based on 57 homes,times 9.55 trips per day. / " (Per City of Renton Determination of Non-Significance(Mitigated) - PP Mitigation Measures) f 519 . i /F70 a - , !la . , i .r f00 4 4 I I 4 I 1 90 5 90 . - . !PER 51 7/ SEG N 70 - a. U . 00 90 .1111 'S E C -" ` _ 40 t 40 ... , , - - - % S , . a ® A� Graph: 1,1 ay of Rentoi 20 Transportation Di✓. Li is rat 5 \` / Renton Aye it#20 2,Jul-400 /0 / - .-.. - t-_ / 2 5 ' $ 6 7 8 9 /a // tit /0 fy /c id i /8 /y.20 .// 2# AM 6 y He>vgs FL 7 y Average Weekday Traffic V:6 ,,,. ' • (North & South Directions) - RENTON AVENUE SOUTH 70 % Chart Estimated 70 % of 544 new trips =381 Trips on Renton Ave per day ,Source of Upper Graph: Est. Increase in Traffic (trips) based on 57 homes, times 9.55 trips per day. (Per City of Renton Determination of Non-Significance(Mitigated) 40 Mitigation Measures) J3o - . . 3I / o.: C ' 1 i SSG A //o - i K T . g 90 I 48 e7 P �� - So 75' o f 1K 6d 56 N ie) . . . .I 0t, _ , U 4o .... RSource oT_ 90 - -- - Lower G-apt : Qty of Renton �® - - i ngpnration riiv . T'aff c Court Summary /0 Eitntc n Ave t'C#2C70t.,Jut-00 12 4 # 4 P /o i/ /A /3Mte5iv er43 .20 /22,If .24 API 6 /7'OORS PJ g PAy �kil r Average Weekday Tic Vohs J (North & South Directions) w CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH 30% Chart Estimated 30 % of 544 new trips = 163 Trips on Renton Ave per day Source of Upper Graph: Est. Increase in Traffic (trips) based on 57 homes, times 9.55 trips per day. ` (Per City of Renton Determination of Non-Significance(Mitigated) ° - ... —.PIP _. .__ . Mitigation Measures) 1 A llo , R /O° 1 , , - T . 4-'7 R 90 --- C__ 1 r- 70 P . R ‘oo So H 50_ .—.. , o . .. .fal U40 ._ _ - ... o►rce of - Lower h. 30 (Sty of Renton 20 1 Transportation Di•. Iiiiffic Count oun.mazy Renton Ave TC It 207)2, u1-00 - _ter 0 / 2 3 - 5 G 7 8 $ /a // /./ /3 /;' /5 /G or /6 /7-20 .2/.,2.23 .24 AM 6 PM /le71)1 s f%R PAY Average Weekday Traffic Vollows (North & South Directions) . RENTON AVENUE SOUTH 50 % Chart Estimated 50 % of 544 new trips ®272 Trips on Renton Ave per day Source of Upper Graph: Est. Increase in Traffic (trips) V based on 57 homes, times 9.55 trips per day. (Per City of Renton Determination of Non-Significance(Mitigated) --f 40 Mitigation Measures) i /30 • - -- • /.1® C .. : •. -- --1-Th ej HP .... toy- 33 ____ /c.c. r . I 1' • R 9® . . .. - r • 5 52 40 kW u 40 R Source qty of Renton Tan• r ation D v. 1 T:aaf Cbun•Sutrunary Rent n A ve'CC#20701, Ju -Of 1 _,y. / 2 5 41 6 7 8 An A, IA 15 444/ /S' 1; iy /8 1?.2o .Z/ .4 "4 Average Weekday Traffic Voles • ` (North & South Directions) �. CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH 50 % Chart Estimated 50 % of 544 new trips =272 Trips on Renton Ave per day Source of Upper Graph: Est. Increase in Traffic (trips) based on 57 homes, times 9.55 trips per day. (Per City of Renton Determination of Non-Significance(Mitigated) .41-(0 . _ Mitigation Measures) 1 . .. i20_ A • ` ! • g 1k i , 1 i T fOd ... — _. . ..__. .__ y - - 40 I yo :89 s�G r o �--- a7 IS 0 . .. .. , _ i . N 7° c . 03 S• rce of • a Gnph; 3® ... .. _.. _. C y of Rc nto7 20 • , _ .• - . _ T . s ortatio_ D . : fit C unt S R.nto 1 Ave IC# 20'02,Jul•00 /0 • / I r-- / 2 3 -s/ 5 ‘ - 8 F /o // £ /, edf ,5 14 ay /6 /7-o .// 2.3 24 Akl HOWS PE.R . j a.y 6 PM J • CO 0 S Z6E in N tn 0 Z in u...111 o 00 itIIII cD £"06Z �!W I 3I loIZII\ 11 ' I N II I I Wage W O I I iF it Q ;., �' o I ?.. \ CO W • s's&Z + W V OC - i 6..o tit• Uh �_' >O W o, O II m0 E,.,,_ • _ �� o II G.-- 6 L.t 6'08Z W cc hit e x,.v. 0 rn1 1 , in1 HERITAGE RENTON HILL STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE EXHIBIT SEC. 20, TWP. 23 N., RGE. 5 E., W.M. N DWN. BY: DATE: JOB NO. 0 4030 Lake Washington w� ETERSON Blvd. N.E.,Suite 200 BMD 12/6/00 HERM-0025 W I CONSULTING Kirkland,WA 98033 Zo Tel(425)827-5874 CHKD. BY: SCALE: SHEET z f- N 'G I N E [ R S Fax(425)822-7216 L.,k. o — 4 JWN VARIES 1 OF 1 --.J Q :':,,n',:imVex.'4,Ri'M,,, ,,',,,,,,:•:*;..,,,..,,,,.. .,‘ ;•,, ,,,,-;,:,,.,,.,:, ,...,-,,.-4, ip.,;: ,. , :. , LK . , ,.., . . Q. ., .. . Assumed • Braking Stopping Sight Distance Reaction Design Speed for BrakeCoefficient Distance Rounded Speed Condition Time Distance of Friction on Levels Co m p uteda for Design (mph) (mph) (sec) (ft) f - (ft) (ft) (ft) 20 20-20 2.5 73.3- 73.3 , 0.40 33.3- 33.3 106.7-106.7 ' 125-125 25 24-25 2.5 88.0- 91.7 0.38 50.5-' 54.8 138.5-146.5 150-150 44- 30 28-30 2.5 102.7-110.0 •- 0.35 74.7- 85.7 177.3-195.7 200-200 1--1 35 32-35 2.5 :2 :117.3-128.3 0.34 100.4-120.1 217.7-248.4 . 225-250 40 36-40 ::: 2.5 ' -132.0-146.7' 0.32 135.0-166.7 267.0-313.3 275-325 45 40-45 . 2.5 , : )46.7-165.0 ,;0.31 • , 172.0-2.17,7- 318.7-382.7_ 32.-400 5? o 50 4450 ' 25 '161 3 183 3 • '.:0 30 ::'215 1-277 8 376.4-461.1 . 400-475 . 1 - 55 ;45-55 (..-.;. iY 2,5, .1176.0-701.7,;' 4 77(0.30,i - 756.0-336.1 432.0-537.8 -..' .: 450-550 , 60 52-60: '..' : 'f: 2.5 ' .1 74190.7-220.8i r.....; 8,0:29 ..:,..310.8-413.8 , 501.5-633.8 ;::' ::7 525-650 i el' • .:::. 65 , 55-65 l'..' 2.5:. ,- "S:r201.7:238.3.! .4' 0:791.f ' (Ir-347.7-485.6 , 549.4-724.0 :7 .:, 550-725 :(70 _tp 58-70 :. ': 2:5:::. :217.7-256.7.:: 7.; ;74 018.; '-'' 400.5-583.3 :.. 613.1-840.0 ,. ..„7 625-850 -., ig .: GT • aDifferent values for the same speed result from w _yainruurieiwai::c6efilciiintt..of friction • 6.5,, .,. .. . ., ;!. i'.` :,, i:', ' ! s•-',. ..'•..t ;E.: :.: :': ‘.;.. Fi- i5. `-' (.1= . - , - ' 7:;- F,' :-.7*, 1 1:4 , . ,.: ...... t-, -: ! ':,' ',..1" .: Y.: '::-.' ;-::::, .:::, .,7-1-• :: ‘.., • ' . ' :: ,..; :: ' . '. CrCi. . : Table III-1. Stopping sight distance (wet pavements). : • A . . s.-: :: ' :: :: --: i:-. : '`, . : --.- : ' : • A •, - .f - A. C,!.? tb T.. . k • Increase for Downgrades Decrease for Upgrades 'Correction In •, Correction in. ,. Assumed . , Stopping :, Stopping Design...' Speed foe Distance(ft) Distance(ft) Speed Condition . (mph) :•, .3% . 6% 9% -(mph) 3% 6% . . : 30 ' . 10 20 30 28 - 10 20 • '• 20 40 70 • 36 10 20 30 - • , • 50 i i• 30 70 - 44 20 30 - 60 • 50 110 - 52 30 50 - 4 65 60 130 - 55 30 60 ' - 4. 70 70 160 - 58 40 70 - Table III-2. Effect of grade on stopping sight distance- wet conditione. ';.,:f-7.•,,. . " ," ":,, -,Q!--r 7 '...-.r'%,;,-..s y"%ce:\ "I_ ci;, ,1 kj1..:, !, ,:, , , ,i /5-7X/-/ / FILE NAME:EX5HER25 \" PLOTTED:12/6/00 IZ �v n Q REQUIRED DISTANCE NEEDED Z impp FOR APPROPRIATE SITE DISTANCE - Z C C/9 r® m —Z EYE HEIGHT Z = 3.50' `^ n LINE OF SIGHT im _---------- �/ j+� ---EXISI7NG GROUND .� T.too OBJECT HEIGHT w ® € (TYP) w a o = 0.50 CREST VERTICAL CURVE CA� a. ro NOT TO SCALE N11 >G r+ ] NcoOIVp�q 0 to .a o ? ~ y ye N n N co0 n HORIZONTAL SIGHT DISTANCE P. m ? ym , o • Z) a � .,. m n 2 / HORIZONTAL SIGHT DISTANCE coO w O NOT TO SCALE rrl rn RI -i ti I Z ZZ o O S � r rv- .. yr E`C / 17 6..) • • o Sr KKstsI AMC LW 1,0•24L fart • No r,C.M &fart -KWACA n.r,t 8; . !a$` Jos _ -_ -JD5 P. JGo • Z. �� 300 _ JBS N. Y aurae;MCC-,---.... \\�GRADE BREAK i ad' ✓• - .ye. 3� - YYq Y r e ./I mo ms.•.vLC 0 Zr 8 '4.0 J80 • / ( ----*Ss .._� a •r.OX - •sarosco'Rana sulo.urnvrx r-.o / / r1.q J70 K rc a I•o t. 375 J / I it / \ • .w J70 ,r o:oN T:oo z•oN :w J:oo I I j T I 4•00 %+• 5•00 •w 5•00 I <� I / ,� BLLFF Law -� / I \ / ✓ \ &AFC LNE\ t / \ �� I I L V //f�\iOwG it I 17 r `rB�• /�r`�1 i / 1 i y` ��\` GRADE BREAK I 1 \ L.E m, ] . , '* 8 ' \ \ \�`r-`� 1 Ne '� 8' o LEGAL DESCRIPTION / I �/ \ D/� I I \ J 1 , / •a,r n rrc KS,Rs o• SC CASr,.xu.a ae /h- \ 11.+� /,i� r Rcno.,r,ro..w SS.wrn K r,ee t usr,.x r ascxLa AS FaaOs Orr cr /\ N,JoO sa rr. \ /zo,. so.rr. I �o.r RC swn..ctr coa(w or RC swncrr,,. BENrcw /B /' .,1 II.I I ( sccrov,r rrt.cc.wrrc4.At..r•C KSr OK 1 11/ nn.En^•ou ar aoo rccr.ac a Ica r.c c / \ /r / I /' 1 i /1 j \ // / f SOUKSrGIr.LO�G.IK r0./V.r 4v hC tWrw \✓� I \ // ` J /le,eeo so.rr. .......JJJ - `� / / 11 1 / / LK or he swncsr u.G�su secs.Ir...... ror.r lI Inc°rccr.ac o•Lcss c sr L'c io.'" re/ r I \ / / 1 I, ` OV• lK SA0 s aK As LO Jrrec OC FROv rK SOYI++KtI / Fe I ( I ��I LG�/ `` \ \, I I I I \ RC Of LO or rAc soursr ..sc A•• rsano•ts• t "`y rK SauM art O�nt snunc sr w•or PC ourRr \ \n l r*n.o.¢a r.Pr ar 1 / �- \ 'II: asr..r o<,,rco rccr.o e a LEss ro PC souMKtr .s 7,600 50.Fr. R'p / 7 \ '1' 1 1 COeK rr(AeOr N IK rWt ar dE!iw.4 • ;4:. ,.. __11/, \) (.,,,-- -.moo' irr-i.1*-----.' ----.....et-- • / — 13.5.13.b. • 1 / • ['IC; on, b I I` / 1A/` IfI I /- 1 r /�Q✓ - ' // �j c\\_� \\\ \\ \\ \ \\\\\\Ser • , // /,,,., • / / I r / t ,B,JOo so.Fr. `zJ,zDO io.If. r \ 1 ' w i� I ( -- `_� I ,I,I00 SO.rr. _/IO,.oO s0.Fr.' \ _ \\ \ \ •\ `• \ \ \ / / / m rrr i/ I �e ,` —� _sCC _LJ ---'�'— `'�— -- \��•—,— 8\.. \. • \ ` \ •_-.�. r \ souM art a nc IL In,c n-ri•J .` L \ f v\c vcuaen WI! Y5'4.y $ 4 \ ,, ( (\ \ I \ 7• Y. o . a /I /•, JC M I,BL arrf •c o\ i J reefr,OJH-]2' . SCEVC'Cis=Zgr r.l arm :! see•Iurr..c n.rp ROC I vrrrc eunc urcl I, trs I trw• • r• uE nwrr r.•,sccr l.,n w arrsrE eJ,smo srw4 1 ��. ..SSE. 3:.A;1�,, ti .s.— r.0lC• .KA.rt•NO•. GRAM.ru �_ �' TO NO-CHASTAIN{ASSOC.,INC. LAKLMDO£DEVELOPMENT CO..INC. r0121VICI 3P.'.1.51A.;` SOUTH 7TH COURT r' ,L, war[rows-[Noarmes J*[LerNURr FLAT Of: TYPICAL sc ROADWAY'CROSS SECTION'A-A' _ ~' ./y RIVER RIDGE ESTATES ✓:l-"•�.lN an' 11 .or ro sc4t y,''�I?`h�..�.Q,. . .. .¢'l ,� i`\�yy,_g n[rnorNrNr CONSULTANTS rr f� +. "�7�n:rtff�'jl' sort.a_...,.., _ r ja ji'A .. .^ •I rr .0„,. w:ia,,soJr ---- DOL 1I INCH[CANALS AO 2[T 'S ••1" { •.11,Z ✓O. In"L,.. .1 i,,`-- .u n•u ^9 _ j�laur .L� 21 d" F /, 4 ' �x/� //"' BIOTA PACIFIC Buck, Wayne F. Page 3 0 ; • Task Leader, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, Lyle, Washington. Prepared terrestrial species portion of Biological Assessment for potential impacts to bald eagles and peregrine falcons that may result from construction of railroad siding in the Columbia Gorge, Washington. • Project Manager, Quinault Casino Wildlife Review, Ocean Shores, Washington. Prepared wildlife review and assessed potential impacts to local wildlife in reference for the proposed Quinault Gambling Casino. `� .. • Project Manager, Landmark, Inc., Fir Glen Wildlife Study, Redmond, Washington. Conducted wildlife study on 13-acre development site. Provided expert testimony during public hearing. • Biologist, Murray Pacific Corporation Cowlitz and Nisqually River Basins Watershed Analyses, Lewis County, Washington. Prepared SEPA checklist for the Connelly, Mineral, and North Fork . • - Mineral, and West Fork Tilton Watershed Analyses. • Task Leader, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Weyerhaeuser Company NEPA Environmental Assessment, Willamette Timberlands, Oregon. Prepared sections on land use And social and... economic conditions for environmental consequences section of environmental assessment being. - prepared for a habitat conservation plan. WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 1989 to 1992. Volunteer. Conducted_research . . regarding the assessment of civil fine§by districttcourt judges for conviction of deer and elk poachers in Washington state. Results presented to the Northwest Section of the Wildlife Society, April 1991. USDA FOREST SERVICE 1990. Biological Technician. Monitored for presence of the northern spotted owl within Spotted Owl Habitat Areas anti Randomly Selected Areas within the Mount Baker- Snoqualmie National Forest. Conducted daytime'follow-up visits to determine reproductive status. • BIOTA PACIFIC Buck, Wayne F. • Page 2 _ , • Task Leader, Winney Construction Spotted Owl Survey, Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Supervised and conducted three years of spotted owl surveys around a Department of Natural Resources timber sale. The surveys resulted in a status 3 owl site being changed to historic status. • Task Leader, ITT Rayonier SEPA Timber Harvest Environmental Impact Statement, western Washington. Conducted marbled murrelet surveys in support of a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a proposed timber harvest. • Task Leader, Rayonier Timberlands Operating Company Habitat Conservation:Plan, Olympic Peninsula, Washington. Supervised and conducted spotted owl site monitoring surveys in support . • of timber operations and the development of a Habitat Conservation Plan. • Field Biologist, U.S. Forest Service/Weyerhaeuser Company Land Exchange Project,"-Western Washington. Trained for and conducted wolf howling surveys in support of a Biological Evaluation for a proposed land exchange. • Field Biologist, Hydro West Group, Inc. Hydroelectric Projects in. the.Nooksack,. 'Skagit and , • - Snoqualmie River Basins, Washington. Assisted in conducting surveys for the northern spotted owl - and the marbled murrelet in support of proposed small hydroelectric projects. - .. • Task Leader, Weyerhaeuser Company Spotted Owl Survey Project, Washington, 1991 to 1992. Supervised field crews conducting spotted owl surveys in support of commercial forest. _ management. t • Task Leader, Rayonier Timberlands Operating Company Project III, Forks, Washington. Supervised the delineation of spotted owl habitat on the Clallam Working Area and ground-truthiug effort. • Task Leader, Weyerhaeuser Company Spotted Owl Survey Project, Washington, 1993 to 1996. Provided technical support, agency coordination, and database management for -the spotted. owl -- survey program'conducted in support of commercial forest management. • Field Biologist, Quadrant Corporation/Taiyo-American Corporation Beaverdam Country Club and Residential Development SEPA Environmental Impact Statement, Issaquah, Washington. Assisted: in on-site water quality monitoring and periodic storm event water quality sampling to develop pre-construction baseline conditions. • Field Biologist, Weyerhaeuser Company Timberland Wetland and Wildlife Habitat Survey, . western Washington. Assisted in delineation of forested wetlands and collection of data to assess :. impacts of various forested wetlands management proposals. Project Manager, Pleasant Harbor Marina Expansion, Brinnon, Washington. Prepared Biological \ssessment for the potential impacts to bald eagles resulting from the expansion of a marina. ditionally, prepared management plans for osprey and bald eagles in reference to the same ect. BIOTA PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL.SCIENCES,INC. _ 10516 E.RIVERSIDE DRIVE BOTHELL,WA 98011 PHONE:425.402.6887 FAx:425.415.6506 WAYNE F. BUCK Wildlife Biologist EDUCATION B.S., 1990, University of Washington, Forest Resource Management EXPERIENCE BIOTA PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current. Wildlife Biologist. • Project Manager, Quality Rock Gravel Pit Expansion, Little Rock, Washington. Prepared wildlife. - -_ review and assessed potential impacts to local wildlife in reference to the proposed Quality Rock gravel pit expansion. �'.• ., • Task Leader, Crown Pacific Canyon Creek Road-use Permit Biological Assessment,.Whatcom- County, Washington. Prepared Biological Assessment that assessed potential impacts to .local wildlife in reference to the granting of a road-use permit by the U.S. Forest Service to the Crown. Pacific Corporation. = : ,. • Task Leader, Crown Pacific East Lake Shannon Road-use Easement Biological Assessment, - Whatcom County and Skagit Counties, Washington. Prepared Biological Assessment that assessed- potential impacts to local wildlife irf reference to the granting of a road-use,permit by the U.S. Forest Service to the Crown Pacific Corporation. BEAK CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED 1991 to 1999. Wildlife Biologist. Mr. Buck was involved with all aspects of spotted owl and marbled murrelet surveys, including planning, report writing, and database management. In addition, he managed projects requiring the preparation of Biological Assessments and served as an expert witness. • • Task Leader, Crown Pacific Hamilton Tree Farm Environmental Impact Statement. Prepared air quality section. V • Team Member, Crown Pacific Hamilton Tree Farm Habitat Conservation Plan. In his capacity,as a wildlife biologist, helped prepare species accounts and impacts. - • Team Member, Murray Pacific Corporation Cowlitz and Nisqually River Basins Watershed Analyses, Lewis County, Washington. Conducted the Level 1 aerial photograph interpretations for r the Riparian Function Module assessment of the East Fork Tilton Watershed Analysis: V • Team Member, Weyerhaeuser Chehalis and Willapa Watershed Analyses, western Washington. Conducted Level 1 aerial photograph interpretations for the Riparian Function Module of the Willapa and Chehalis River Watershed Analyses. Bennett Development Wildlife Assessment Appendix. Continued , No es. 1: ,. 5tatu"s Status 'ori`P o�ec j L"< to MAMMALS Townsend's big-eared bat Plecotus townsendii FSC SC Low Caves, open young forest Lack of potential roosting habitat Long-eared myotis Myotis evotis FSC --- Low Snags,caves and cliffs in Lack of old forest habitat, snags riparian old-growth forest Long-legged myotis Myotis volans FSC --- Low Snags,caves and cliffs in Lack of old forest habitat,snags mature and old-growth riparian forest Gray wolf Canis lupus FE SE None Wilderness areas, open Extremely rare in Washington,does tundra,forest not occur in urban environment Grizzly bear Ursus arctos FT SE None Wilderness areas,alpine Require large areas of unroaded meadows, subalpine forest wilderness Pacific fisher Mattes pennanti FSC SE None Mature and old-growth Lack of mature forest habitat pacifica coniferous forest California wolverine Gulo gulo luteus FSC SC None Wilderness areas, Lack of wilderness and conifer forest coniferous forest habitat North American lynx Felis lynx canadensis FP ST None Early successional forest for Does not occur at low elevation foraging, late-successional • for denning 1 Status Codes: FT-Federal Threatened SE-State Endangered FE-Federal Endangered.'. ST-State Threatened FP-Federal Proposed SS-State Sensitive FC-Federal Candidate SC-State Candidate(for Endangered,Threatened or Sensitive) FSC-Federal Species of Concern ., SM-State Monitor P-Species not listed, but breeding areas are protected under state regulation 7 December 2000 Page A-4 • Bennett Development Wildlife Assessment Appendix. Continued ,ft p harice of;,o rki 3r • _- .:.+,: .. yr• Y>: �Status�"` =Statra0 ",on'.PFo'ect^'.=,' L`- ,....... :.. r,' :•e .+a :':'•,;;<. t z 4 ..+ , v 4 s ..M , na S 2t6 3 t ? BIRDS(continued) Yellow-billed cuckoo Coccyzus americanus -- SC Very Low Riverine woodlands. Very rare and thought to be extirpated as breeder in Washington Northern spotted owl Stnx occidentalis FT SE None . Mature and old-growth forest Lack of forest habitat caurina Vaux's swift Chaetura vauxi ;--,, SC. ,. . Low Riparian,young and old- Lack of potential nest or roost trees growth forest on site Pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus --- SC Low Mature and old-growth forest Lack of snags for foraging and/or nesting Olive-sided flycatcher Contopus cooperi FSC -- Low Conifer forest Lack of conifer forest on site Willow flycatcher Empidonax traillii FSC -- Low Willow thickets Known to occur in areas of low density development Purple martin Progne subis -- SC Low Open or semi-open country No large open water bodies near water Oregon vesper sparrow Pooecetes gramineus FSC SC None Remnant prairies Lack of prairie habitat affinis 1Status Codes: FT-Federal Threatened SE-State Endangered FE-Federal Endangered ST-State Threatened FP-Federal Proposed.. SS-State Sensitive FC-Federal Candidate SC-State Candidate(for Endangered,Threatened or Sensitive) FSC-Federal Species of Concern SM-State Monitor P-Species not listed, but breeding areas are protected under state regulation r•, 7 December 2000 .. Page A-3 Bennett Development Wildlife Assessment Appendix. Continued .,C :., ,,..: :. • , ommon.Name .. -..; ,,_ . .• S i -i;';:;:. Narrie c enttfic. • .->:�::. :_:..:,Federal r �'� :, - Stat e: O: ccurre nce':. �Hatiat: i" ;:Notes• : z a Status< -$ t5 : 3OT`Project Site - BIRDS Great blue heron Ardea herodias --- P None Riparian-wetland, mature- No nest colonies or foraging habitat forest edge on site Black-crowned night heron Nycticorax nycticorax --- P None Marshes,shores, mature- No winter colonies on site forest edge Bald eagle Haliaeetus FT ST Present Riparian mature forest No potential nesting, roosting,or leucocephalus (flying over foraging habitat on site; however, site) birds foraging on the Cedar River fly over the site Northern goshawk Accipitergentilis FSC SC None Mature and old-growth forest No potential nesting or foraging habitat on site Golden eagle Aquila chrysaetos --- SC None , Cliff-talus,tundra, open No nests or potential nest sites forest,grass observed on site Merlin Falco columbarius -- SC Low Open woods,cliffs,adjacent Rare breeder in Washington, no to grasslands nests observed on site Peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus --- SE None Open country,cliffs No potential nesting or foraging habitat on site Sandhill Crane . Grus canadensis -- SE None Prairies,fields Lack of foraging habitat Marbled murrelet Brachyramphus FT ST None Large diameter conifers with No potential nest platforms on site marmoratus .nest platforms 1Status Codes: FT-Federal Threatened.:.:_.... ___.._..___...- SE-State Endangered. FE-Federal Endangered ST-State Threatened FP-Federal Proposed SS-State Sensitive FC-Federal Candidate SC-State Candidate(for Endangered,Threatened,or Sensitive) FSC-Federal Species of Concern SM-State Monitor , P-Species not listed, but breeding areas are protected under state regulation 7 December 2000 Rage A-2 Bennett Development Wildlife Assessment Appendix. Terrestrial wildlife species with special state or federal status that occur in Region 4. c t: va• S.. .Y Y r� Scien ific:Name'• J:'F' t eder I�°a State�::¢`_.'`:-OccurFej:i'ep"=�-�•� '6 oirim" N" n ,Ha tat=-::�: -2�r% :N es on airie`- S 'tu`s to `�us �`ri, :xStat 'O P o ec�r t .e •4w.a/,,, INVERTEBRATES Beller's ground beetle Agonum belled FSC SC None Bogs Lack bog habitat Long-horned leaf beetle Donacia idola -- SC None Bogs Lack bog habitat Hatch's click beetle Eanus hatch!! .FSCr, Sc „ None Bogs Lack bog habitat Johnson's hairstreak Mitoura Johnson! -- SC None Coniferous forest containing Lack of western hemlocks with western hemlock with mistletoe mistletoe infections AMPHIBIANS Larch mountain salamander Plethodon!arse!!! FSC SS None Moist talus slopes No talus accumulations on site, which is at extreme northern boundary of known range Tailed frog Ascaphus true! FSC SM None Cold,rocky streams; mature No high gradient streams on site mixed forest Cascades frog Rana cascadae FSC — None Ponds adjacent to streams No perennial water body on site Oregon spotted frog Rana pretiosa FC SE None Perennial water bodies No perennial water body on site Western toad Bufo boreas -- SC Low Most common near ponds Most likely to occur in damp habitat and small lakes downhill from project site REPTILES Northwestern pond turtle Clemmys marmorata FSC SE None Ponds, lakes,wetlands No ponds on site marmorata 1Status Codes: FT-Federal Threatened SE-State Endangered FE-Federal Endangered ST-State Threatened FP-Federal Proposed , . SS-State Sensitive FC-Federal Candidate- -"' :. State Candidate(for Endangered,Threatened orSensitive)=:L. -. "' .. '-' - --'--' "' '' •' ' ' .. .. . ., ..________ FSC-Federal Species of Concern SM-State Monitor P-Species not listed, but breeding areas are protected under state regulation 7 December 2000 Page A-1 APPENDIX Ryan Fike From: Stenberg,;Kate[Kate.Stenberg@METROKC.GOV] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 12:39 PM To: 'jnelson@pcecivil.com' Subject: RE: Eagle;Nesting Sites Jon- There are no known bald eagle nests near Philip Arnold Park in Renton. The WA State Dept. of Fish &Wildlife (WDFW) keeps very good records of bald eagle nest locations and they update King County whenever new nest locations are confirmed. In addition, it would bean unlikely spot for a bald eagle nest due to their demonstrated preference for nests in shoreline areas. With only a few exceptions, bald eagles in King County nest near lakes, large rivers and marine shorelines. Bald eagles forage in many of the same types of habitats that they are found nesting in. Bald eagles are known to forage along the Cedar River. WDFW is most concerned with those foraging areas within 250 feet of a shoreline such as the Cedar River. Within shoreline foraging areas, the preservation of large trees is the most common management recommendation. However, based on my limited understanding of your project area, your site is well outside of even these potential foraging areas. I would not be surprised if bald eagles are seen flying over the Phillip Arnold Park area on a regular basis. There may be.a thermal effect or regular wind currents lifting from the valley floor up above the plateau that the Park is on that-the birds take advantage of to gain,height when traveling from Lake Washington up the Cedar River. If there is documentation of a Bald eagle nest, our ofice would be very pleased to receive it and we would work with WDFW to confirm any such reports. Documentation should include a detailed description of the nest tree location. Reports of regular fly- _ overs overs by eagles are not sufficient proof of nesting as these birds range widely in their daily foraging activities and will use regular routes. Thank you for your interest in the wildlife of King County, Kate Stenberg, Ph.D. King County Wildlife Program Manager 201 S. Jackson, Suite 600& Seattle, WA 98104-3854 206-296-7266 kate.stenberg( metrokc.gov Original Message From:jnelson@pcecivil.com[mailto:jnelson@pcecivil.com] Sent: Monday,'November 27,2000 1:47 PM • To: Stenberg,Kate Cc:Fike,Ryan;Elizabeth Higgins;Gygi,Ann Subject:Eagle Nesting Sites Kate: As we discussed on the phone, a neighbor to my client's project stated there were bald eagles nesting on- the project site. The site is located on the east side of Philip Arnold Park in Renton. Are you aware of any such site in this area? Thanks for your time. Jon Nelson 12/11/00 Bennett Development Wildlife Assessment REFERENCES Stenberg, Kate, King County Wildlife Program Manager. Personal communication, e-mail to Jon Nelson, 1 December 2000. • 7 December 2000 Page 5 Bennett Development Wildlife Assessment CONCLUSIONS No evidence of use of the site by priority species was observed during the field visit, and it is unlikely that the property currently provides habitat for any priority wildlife species, including bald eagles. There are no potential bald eagle nest trees on the project site, and King County is unaware of any bald eagle nests in the vicinity (Stenberg, pers. comm., 1 Dec 00). Because of the lack of potential nest trees and the location of the project site, which is located more than 250 feet from the Cedar River, it is unlikely the site would be used by bald eagles for nesting. The nearest known bald eagle nest is located on the southern end of Mercer Island. Bald eagles that have been seen in the area of the project site are likely foraging upstream on the Cedar River (Stenberg, pers. comm., 1 Dec 00). The development should not have a significant long-term impact on wildlife in the area. The amount of wildlife habitat that will be lost as a result of the development is insignificant when compared to the amount of forested habitat adjacent to and above the Cedar River that will not be developed in the future.: The project site is too small to support the habitat needs of a single deer. Deer currently using the project site require additional habitat and will continue to use the undeveloped along the Cedar River habitat as they do now. 7 December 2000 Page 4 Bennett Development Wildlife Assessment RESULTS Site Visit Biota Pacific visited the project site on 1 December 2000. The 10-acre project site consists of two level tiers with the northwest corner of the site approximately 15 to 20 feet lower than the remaining area to the east. This lower tier is characterized by a sparse canopy of black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and red alder (Alnus rubra). The understory, which has been partially cleared, consists primarily of a matrix of grasses and Himalayan blackberry (HolodiscUs discolor). The upper tier of the project area is characterized by closed-canopy- hardwood forest that is dominated by black cottonwood, red alder, and-bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) with diameters generally ranging from approximately 10 to 14 inches. A few conifer species, including western hemlock. (Tsuga heterophylla) and western redcedar (Thuja plicata) are widely scattered throughout this portion of the project area. The understory on the upper, tier is - dominated by sword fern (Polystichum munitum), salal (Gaulthena shallon); Oregon grape (Berberis nervosa), and common snowberry (Symphoricarpos albus). There are no snags and very little coarse woody debris within the project. During the site visit direct observations were made of the following species: • California quail (Callipepla califomica) northern flicker (Colaptes auratus) American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapillus) song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis) eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) In addition, evidence of black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) presence was observed. Database Search Discussion pending return of database information 7 December 2000 Page 3 �-._ —1..I 'sera- kno CITY OF . .• I.Emrr,E RENrON w,•. • M • •••--.••., w �^ — rM e•` RENTON TREE CumwC/u aculwc PUN "`- L J : L • 4J L JJ . I y1" FT , 7L 4--- 4- -1 e1 1----.^Y/ . • i 1!..• 2. • 71;,Alt,fil • . ....".„.1,ikksT74,1 _ JONES AV.. S. "'—--\—- I gat , )\.3* -s• \7-00Pr/v‘,-N 011 . - ..• Ile- .94,,irs.. • 00 o*. ,�'.��{ /// y.�/fib �`�.i • _ dF�a• a11 '6''_-;c: 1i• .I e---^.,` i ,, .i ' . Ai 1 J 8 1 e, T ♦ , 1, 1 `. _ 111 1 d 94 17 � • ill 9 %' `►� � .'t• r r>. c � r LE s�, - • c ..07:-, )1 ,i) i . - 1 -g- ',. I u 7-1--. ..'1 • • • . 1;i,F1_._ E.- - • ,,‘ vi„..,4 ,...., i j:c4.....(aftr% N........1 , I is.: ,is:j c....- -. .....* . *•••"'en., ...<4 • • •. , ;004 7' -i•3 --e•42' ' ‘•i it •' ,-,,,,,,a1 1 ,,,,,..„,-,),..r. iii it • - .'?',�(% O - I \< . • . 0... ,450.4 • .,.., /jj, j 1 /is . 1 1 ' .` ♦-„:4fr \•L.. IQ ,`. //f1.11• 0 1 -4.Y- F'' �'-, 1 J.4 1; '. .‘t o• ' !...,• i1ii0C1:,3 .,, '+,.•� ' r�,� �,:° 'OQ 'EO1 �(l%'�= ,rot=l' -' "• / 11 i .•ot , ';;#11e44•••.r00.1.idiallak.4!,2%\th.. .d61141:!•,....•,.....7%., :%•%1 • it \ • :(/fir 7 ,, a ()do. A %. •a`♦ �,.• !oral • -"M.. _Ip d. + 1 :, v . i Ir 1 ' o . ace ► / er ' I / �,^, '1 r•‘ !!1 0 i t41{% a ',} 1 .c� 1 �♦ e70° r ► o " 11 1 / V 1, IM,° Hv1: I e I•i-,e v,,Is, -- t i r 1 q _1 :-♦ 1),• \ Iab,•, ,i (!�\fi�� `a , --‘/, /.f i r . 11 ; ./ V . ',n , • b♦a O� C, r;Po pt_d i O<-' `1 ' a �ae ' (i.1440 -,,O 41 fe • " 0.. r . • ,O ',• ,_- , x r �qi . a_a- .n. - - � - : 1 .....1_,----...-' - --L-u/ / ... / \ r----i---i--�--'-_�-1- ;r'-7••`--- `,`\-Ns, t - , ,/ I \ •/ \ \ 1 I r\sI(itfL P1I IlL f /'\N / \` \ '' SE Sib OR - / / ' - / / -.,. \ / --.\ \\ r1 _ I / / -L r L. 1 • • Figure 1. Project area map. Bennett Development Wildlife Assessment INTRODUCTION Bennett Development has submitted an application with the City of Renton to develop a 10-acre parcel of land opposite Phillip Arnold Park in Renton. Bennett development contracted Biota Pacific Environmental Sciences, Inc.' (Biota Pacific) to provide an assessment of impacts to wildlife that may be using the project site. PROJECT DESCRIPTION • The project site is located in a 10-acre triangle in the middle of the northern boundary of Section 20 of Township 23 North, Range 05 East; Willamette Meridian(Figure 1). The project site is bounded to the north by the River Ridge.Ridge- subdivision, to the west by Phillip Arnold Park, and to the east by,the-Falcon Ridge subdivision. A steep forested ravine that drains north to the Cedar River • forms the' boundary at the northeast corner of the project site. The-current - development plan will result in the establishment of 57 homes within the subdivision. Plans also include a stormwater detention pond and park. - • METHODS The wildlife assessment,consisted of three primary elements. First, Biota Pacific conducted a visit to the project site to assess the value to wildlife of the on-site habitat, and to search for evidence of the presence wildlife, especially priority wildlife species or raptor nests. Priority wildlife species are those listed or are candidates to be listed by the Washington Department -of Fish and -Wildlife (WDFW) as Endangered, Threatened, or Sensitive. • Second, based on the findings of the field visit, Biota Pacific evaluated the - potential of the site to support any priority wildlife species that may occur in the- -- - vicinity of the project area (Appendix). - _ Third, Biota Pacific requested that the WDFW Priority Habitats and Species Program (PHS) conducted a search of their database for the occurrence of any . priority habitats or species in the vicinity of the project area. • 7 December 2000 5 Page 1 BENNETT DEVELOPMENT WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Bennett Development 9 Lake Bellevue Drive, Suite 100-A Seattle, Washington 98005 Prepared by: Biota Pacific Environmental Sciences, Inc. 10516 East Riverside Drive Bothell, Washington 98011 December 2000 Project 045 BENNETT DEVELOPMENT , : _, WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT • Prepared for: Bennett Development 9 Lake Bellevue Drive, Suite 100-A Bellevue, Washington 98005 Prepared by: Biota Pacific Environmental Sciences, Inc. 10516 East Riverside Drive Bothell, Washington 98011 December 2000 Project 045 rin 1 tl• -, _...�V I .• c..... .�._. Mr.Ryan A.Fike Bellevue,WA 98005 Heritage Renton Hill Preliminary Plat,LUA00-053,PP,ECF May 26,2000 Page Accident Records . _ ■ Provide accident incident reports for the past five years for intersections and streets in the Renton Hill area.Characterize these by nature,location,number of incidents. This area includes streets bounded by Interstate 405 on the west and north,the Shuffieton Right of Way to the south,and the Cedar River greenway to the east.The Falcon Ridge development may be excluded. • Intersection Reconfguration • Design • • The intersection reconfiguration proposed.is not acceptable to the Transportation Division or the Parks Department. The existing access along Beacon Way S to the park must remain as it is now. Access to the plat should be evaluated directly from SE 7th Court east of the Beacon Avenue ROW. This new intersection would include a stop sign for the new street at SE.7th Court The existing interchange would remain unchanged. •This configuration would require - vehicles exiting the plat to stop at SE 7t Court,turn left onto SE 7th Court,and stop again at the existing top sign at SE 7th Court's intersection with the Seattle Pubic Utilities'ROW; Beacon Way$,,S 7t Street,and Jones Avenue S. - Analysis • A traffic analysis of this intersection must be submitted that demonstrates that it would operate effectively given theamount'.of increased traffic generated by the proposed development and the unusual number of streets that intersect. - • If you have any questions,please call me at 425.430-7382. You or the transportation engineer may also contact Neil Watts,Director of Development Engineering Plan Review at 425-430- 7278. • • Sincerely • Elizabeth Higgins,AICP Senior Planner . Cc: Karl Hamilton,Transportation Planning Leslie Betlach,Parks Department Jennifer Henning,Development Services Neil Watts,Development Services Parties of Record file . • • • TOTAL P.03 1'IY1 I—. b—GUUU IU•. O 1.1 1 1 Ur f ci i 1 UI '�LJ "1JV JVV I VL+ VJ CITY OF RENTON -;,lL Planning/Building/Public.Works Department Jesse'Ihnner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator. May 26,2000 Mr.Ryan A. Fike Bennett Development 9 Lake Bellevue Drive, Suite 100-A Bellevue,WA 98005 • Re: Heritage Renton Hill Preliminary Plat,LUA00-053,PP,ECF Hold Letter • Dear Mr.Fike • - . :. .'' As you are aware,the•comment period for the Heritage-Renton Hill Preliminary.Plat closed May _ 19,.2000. This.week those comments have been considered by:the appropriate depaittnents of the. - City that are reviewing the land use action submittal.la particular,the project/park access as , :- proposed proposed was discussed in a meeting of members of the Development Services,Public.Works- (Transportation),and Community Service(Parks)Departments of the City of Renton. • In addition to the design of the entry to the proposed preliminary plat and Philip Arnold Park, general transportation issues in the Renton MIL area were discussed.. : . As you are aware,this project was scheduled:for review`at the May 30,2000,Environmental Review Committee(ERC)so tbatthey could'make a State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) Threshold Determination. At this time;additional-information will be:fequiredpriorto.the ERC • • meeting. Therefore,the ERC meeting;and subsequently,'the public hearing previously scheduled for June 27,2000,will be rescheduled. Until additional information,as outlined in this letter,is received and accepted as adequate,the project is on hold.as of the date of this letter. • • As mentioned, a primary concern is related to transportation issues on Renton Hill. For this • reason,please ask the•transportation engineers to supply the following: Traffic Count • • • Provide traffic counts for a period of twenty-four hours per day for one week for the • following streets(not intersections): • 1. S 76 Street bet eon Grant Avenue S and Renton Avenue S 2. Cedar Avenue$between S 4th Street and S 5th Street - 3. Renton Avenue S in the 300 block Park Traffic • Discuss additional traffic to parks for ball field use,group picnics;and general park use and how traffic generated by the park location relates to capacity of the proposed development.. • • 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 TTra papercomma 607E fBcyaea marw,ao%poet consumer er H. 69 HERITAGE RENTON HILL TIMELINE .•;4,v rat March 24, 1999 moo Renton School District selects Bennett Development as the purchaser of the Renton Hill site. See Exhibit"A" September 2, 1999 Bennett Development has a mandatory Pre-application meeting with the City of Renton regarding a proposed Sixty-nine (69) lot subdivision on Renton Hill. See Exhibit"B" November 4, 1999 Bennett Development hosts a voluntary community meeting for the Renton Hill, River_ Ridge and Falcon Ridge communities at the Renton Community Center. Over One Hundred residents showed up to discuss the proposed development. See Exhibit"C" "D", "E". - January 6,2000 Bennett Development has a voluntary 2nd Pre-application meeting with the City.of Renton regarding a proposed Sixty(60) lot subdivision on Renton Hill. The new,. . proposal incorporates the City of Renton,the community, and the Seattle Public Utilities contributions and ideas. See Exhibit"F" January 25,2000 Bennett Development has a voluntary community meeting with the River Ridge Homeowners Association and the President of the Renton Hill Association. The meeting allowed the Associations to review and comment on the revised proposed subdivision before submitting to the City of Renton. April 3,2000 Bennett Development sends out a letter and a proposed subdivision map to the Renton Hill community leaders: Dwight Potter(Falcon Ridge Homeowners Assoc.), Douglas Bergquist(River Ridge Homeowners Assoc.), and Ruth Larson(Renton Hill Community. Assoc.) for a last review before submitting a subdivision application to the City of Renton. See Exhibit"G" May 4,2000 Application is deemed complete by the City of Renton for a Fifty-six (56) lot subdivision. May 26,2000 Hearing date of June 27, 2000 is postponed for further traffic counts and plat revisions. Plat revisions were revised to a Fifty-seven (57) lot subdivision. The City also required an additional week of traffic counts during the softball/baseball season at Phillip Arnold Park. Bennett Development responded with three weeks of additional traffic counts. See Exhibit"H" 1i t Ts ll. iS e : 346( (6-gt&:(/) „oot 0 Renton School District 403 n dTT~ 300 Southwest 7th Street, Renton, Washington 98055-2307 403 BUSINESS OFFICE March 25, 1999 Mr. Arvin Vander Veen, SIOR Colliers International 601 Union Street, Suite 5300 Seattle, WA 98101-4045 Dear Arvin: Attached is a signed copy of the purchase and sale agreement between Bennett Homes and Renton School District for the purchase of the "Renton Hill" site. The agreement was approved at the March 24, 1999 board meeting. We are excited about this transaction and look forward to working with them.over the next year. Thanks for all of your help, Arvin. Sin erely, Debra Aungst Assistant Superintendent: Business 11 attachment - - - c: Judy Bigelow, PGE Kohlwes Education Center . : 34,4i9 ,N.IIVIO 14+1•A i-11.144q • t(*51 , 1491144J - JJ-'410dcl 0loWV • Iht:1-1- J-W1,1144 •. - . fr1.• al . • . . . IA r\ • . • 41 ) • . . lk. '. eg.\ .. :. . • (4 , —0 ••— 4 • 4 • 142 7ki. . • . •• \ ag042 (011 %J, . 0 V107ie40- - • 0 . `1' • • cmpAtien9.., w.147.440:6•19 ,d, 1-16141-4.4, do • . . ' ik • eV • 74 . . . . . .H— (4 , 1 cri. r. -- .6 v 14 ns. f 0 . 44abd ,Au Jew-in • 11 • A -7•441 JAW/hew-7re`..ndeViiI di#1 S . '''"'':','41,0welom%WV`,02reo velotkAlc J0 finivaallAX 4 buckp(-NW 4/ • • la. •0 ik - • . - • . . "- e 4 . . " :• 6 "0 1 • • ' 41 # V/ ' 1 .nucti •• • . . ... 4- \ . larkbav'AIN Az 1 ,•m.1 w--J i• III . axi,atig =1•YAkti --a--. :—....--F71-. .:..1...__.. 44 .. S. I ii I - i . ./.> t6 I I 1 . I I \4 •. . 4 --e.4 14 c* ,j .__#,i‘i m • kl , j 0 I . -, . # $. a . . . ... . - 10 _.. . . : . t V . ... . Owthigl a 7,1 \/ 1 • \..._ 46 -kg i_91; i '' 1 — l 'a° .I. L • . Q\..). vr.,- k_i-- /-ktiAtit.., -..14// ild-• 9 ill I I /' i ._.... .....___.., • • • ca . , ! . > . . . • Iriffil BENNETT HOMES October 21, 1999 j Re: Community Meeting Dear Neighbor, . You are invited to attend a meeting to discuss a proposed housing development in your community.!The property,which is directly across Beacon Way South from Arnold Park, is approximately 10 acres in size and zoned for 8 homes to the acre. Bennett Homes was recently selected by the Renton School District as the buyer of their . property. We have met with the City of Renton on a preliminary basis and now wish to get neighborhood.input into the property's development. =. Here are the details: When: November 4, 1999 7:00 p.m. Where: Renton Community Center . 1715 Maple Valley Highway Renton,WA 98055 Directions: See map on reverse We look forward to meeting with you and learning more about your neighborhood, as well as answering any questions you may have. Sincerely, BENNETT CORPORATION 0 ak,, Chris Austin Vice President . 9 Lake Bellevue Drive,Suite 100-A, Bellevue,WA 98005 (425)646-4022 Fax: (425) 646-4024 . , SE,/ 6c"- \KAP „ L 0'443 ,. ,•,,,,;.!:%•11/5n,"?i,.-P4%/,.;,•;',.. ..?;ii.';', .•,/,' .:,:' ?:.:.... ,,,,,,,,'Pr."4,V1'"''''''.• 'Xil'''7..76'./;.."6'''"/.?/,';':'h''',.';',V./..:6P.,,,;',;':.;','....:',7:4;4.W4:4/1.... .6.”61.'6/„ i•'.,6/.6,,i'.. a , .. .::..' '',.%.,-;',96.:.•14,..,,k.A. a,,I.,,,,,;;;;.4..,.:•,..:•:;;,;•,,,,w.,,I,4•/,/,'0,., •''.7,4'"it'''!':".!id!:t/47.,,'.1'.,'6,i';5.. t.,`66-6.%,..,V61A).4,6'i6:74 ,.. .-..N.4a,,111.•,,,..,,,,„'..., •,,,.;.•,..,., ,, ,,.. •',If...,,,,,..„,•,..:. ...,..,,,..,., „.„...,., .;„.,:,...,,.., ... • Ifil ::E - -, 1111111111111111111111111111111KWAN11111.11111111131111141111,Mlifirallag_NM v 71fli ,r4...4,v - lii., • . , . . ... ,,,, •. +.;• RapPPP- •_ . ..a . •,),•. I ‘I'll \ *'..-31;4%ItiDS ' c .411t,TK,w I ... - • , -. ,„,,,,i , .:- li, CEDAR RIVER .Zi ...."1"mam . //Ar.',A4`7 5 • NE 1.14 c .-4 ' '.ii•••••:••••,P....';',Id ., .-• ,e,.'. •:- . ••..'"' ?!,.-';:'ir. .1..; 11'7 - 'ia' REWITN . . . ' • - i 1 : ••;:".-2,.4.,,,.-,,. .: .4f, , / , .,.. •0••, ..-., ••fi ...., „,,,,,, . 4 HS ST NH. . • ... • „ '-i-"; :,..;;;, ''.. :" • ' VS • c: .,,..,t,,;,...,•.‘,."kg,7.-.. .-.,.it•••••• \ 1,1 Alp . . ir,•:, •; .• tezi .:" 4:, .-..; ,t.%,Yi4, ; , , • ,..„.,,...7,. ,..:.. , ,,,, • , . ...;..2„..,,,,, . ...t; -1: .14u IT H< : ST • . •, -• f.....k. '',/,'/ .•,- :r, ..,..•1 .',4t,:n •. s .. i ' 24:1:s°- ..,74, 2500 --' •?;;T"..•;"/" ,,-4,•••••• f 401 • - , •. ., •,... • • W :&.,,i;••••••;•:' ' • ›.-' • 41-•.99". i.). 1 . ;. . „, L., ... . „... ., L.... L. , , ...0 • .,,, ..., •,, . . . --. „ ,... ,,. .., ,,, ,,,L. „.„„,, :,,,•, , ,„:„. ...... .„.,,,,,,p,•:•,;:,. k,.4,,,,t:z.-•:!..;„, -.,.-",'. ...!--- • • I • .,..,,,::•• 0 -..on .q, „, -;;L:ii •-,,-..••--••• . ..• •••'•. •,,,,,,,,,, ,.,. •,'to •;.-••••,7,,,,I, ,;,:z;.::‘,Li. - ... V .•••7:„...-:.4::.:-174:, •;: •!. '. .. ., E. . . ..5:,. •-• ..' . . , -•,;.•?„7,...., p h.7.'i 4‘.,.' ',!.,.,%.;", 4„1.,. •,.... ,, :'.• RD.- , CIYAVI.U157 • .. . - -• •••• ' •"" . • • •" -.1; li•J‘. le' ''''''T;RENTON -- :i i .. 11111111111aSsorriftwoub.. /:4*....4.- ' . . ... i'..7-;.1t.:,2X-:.•?1-1,2`. AIRPORT.....'1..-...:1 'tifitelf,-,-.-,-,:,..,-.; .• !,..,..1 pffir 7 :///iirm".:-.„.;•. • • . .. .,1.-„.n.y,8,,,••••A-1R-.OPT-f-r-A4Y.'.71 ' .41:f>.,''...:.24P;;: .":,::::;S':;:',. .. '). . .'• :,.... . . ,.,5' ,.... . . -.':... .....-.•, -. - ;!:..:,... ,s11111E,,,:gf.:..,,,:-:-..„ a P",'...:',":... '.;`4.-- •. //// -..', 4'0:-* '''''jiE..->.-1:: . ;.:" .. ;=':-.4. - ,.,. •;-..... ' :..i. , 4,,--',. 0?..+•:.1.-., 'l,.i..,nr t, . , , . ......, 12 altiffq.z.j...0-. :---------, -:f,..J• trot, k.•,•.. ,'•.i.t...tyy,. rj J „/.. . ....,„:„..,:m ,,. _..... : . .., .. . ;4......,.:.%408 IN. :1-.::•1 zif\i' !..,F,-;_-t:•-!-:-.;', ._•;•- -- •,,,..,.-•-• r•.;,,...•• •,.. , i"ERefr. . A s-• S VIC.„lTo;•:-.:n R.-:,.:,•:,,1,,,;.-,,,4f.,,.,,,':.-:....3...°:•',::7.°•.4-•-.-•..A,.-,.;...x-.f::..-"A9,Y1.,.;!...'-.,,';..'.3'C.k...-..1,7 5":...,;i4..i...-.;.:1e.-,b.,,,-.F...,,0,.,....:....,s.f,#,z.:.;.•.4::-;---,-,:.4•IAN,:,-,,•-.!.•. f.0;•....1•if•...•'S4•i-.b;.-•...4', 3 , 4st j :13g r:.:_.•';-,.,I.,-,-,/.,.e •..*,`;.*„.*v 11A41„/1 7 \‘i7i3Or-17,.1111.7),.••t••.•,•i '. _._„,. .,r--..1 ,. E''it•.-. t TI N-. G .• .-, :::-.,:i., ..:,..-...::.•..: ,,,,44.0 h i/:•AAP.ofik/.6.161„ ‘..:;:iE....:,., v:,:.:.'.;-,;..4-..,,,,c-Emti-ER-y .,,-;.:„.-,..,..,:,0:::..,.....,!.,.:.•'..,-,. .......-::. ..-., .f-1.1.2:: ..s.....--y;-.F3433.2-. ..t.:,4-..4 i:.:iA-:,,'•-')$•`-'. '' :".11'-k!' .,/ 1,;; •jar ..'..j 67/4V'''' PP' ''1 'AP/06\-t'rse-,.t-S-AP.::',4?-::Vc.:.-t,-.:. ,-.-.,,. ,z...,;.7.--.7::,,i;.:,,-. .......z....,--.,-,,: :f„,.,:,-,:_fi„: ,,,..4,1,,-• '...' ."' • -.' 6,9NR-Aft,•:.Ss,.t0t2',,,--:1'L',4,3-4.K;-RFlRt-f.:-yn..:.'.I- -- n'.0;-?-:;.4:-a-.-57:r..'a76-7''--"-,vT':;''g',j.•-.-4•.,•q::,:,;1•A;ll5-:'.,7-..-.i.fi.iiv.;,',.--.,"•.•,,4,. :.4.i. i.: 00„*:,„, --4s.N„i.i0.,0pi.i. 4e,.,./.,0,..y:n,:.-...0,.„..-y.,,1,,0.0„...:..1,,:,,-.,f,,.,-:-\1.:.7,mn'6,'y'.-:i'9...y'Zn-.-.1.;:•.7..'.''.:..-;.:....;.1;.7-.'':;....:.,•.,:F.-.-.r,•..:.-:•:.:::.:4:-:..,.'.,..f?.......:,.;:-;":7a.-!-..---.--..F:..:4..,.',:'.:,t'.:,.,-.-1-.',.,-:;.M,..-.":.:.,T:,',1C..-1-1-19.-..'..` .-:.-.,.`.:..:•-.:'.,.....:-../. .......: .'.r,-.f.:;-';'-'.'.-....... ___ ',....,,........4ista,spv .,,.,.'4,;i ic*,,,,ii---i,:,,,., ''''''.' .•- ..,' - -----,i Pr1,glif,f,.''''''.,;77:-.-,-.-..t,,--- 4.- -.-.-•,-;... \\ ,G. ',. f.:'.-....-..:,:.•:';-..„ . . -. . . .. . ..... ,Wtgalin -‘".,:,.. •,770 ..g410.1 ., 4.73'.:4-:-V-'..,-,2.[:- i 0:1.%., fr,"..;.:'''.,'Ci' '''':".• ..... . .-. ...••'....•'. '. ..7.,Ci.-. - . ".. %":...i. •. "! '.'-' :- '.. • ,'..;'.. - - ..„?.. :,;:,,e, ,it 0 47.-•,. -s-.,.. •;.4.` •f•...CO i•.=,..,-17.,4A, I% - 4,--•" -....• . -• ••• - v. •-::-' -- - - - ' - . - -- . . ;„.4.\•,.'1.Y:''....,.4,9e''..;,i a.e.i'''.15 .....S.: . kl,0,1 ',4 -.I .14.,..P..'....: .°.;'"4:4...(47 :.4:i'f.44: TMAI'ler:t./-446.••••:..•'•....-•. .:.i.::.',.:•';'' .:•... :.' -• :•''''.- ...C.' :• ..x 4''-.•,..N.,., -. : P1111 i'!..f1C. ....;;;;13,2 1,:•-i.•., zis..: ..d411,-.;,:;.... ;,4 .*:&.....1:::„,;.:,..:9,..i, :. ' „,..,... - ,..,., ,....,7 6 • ''.'''' . .i ':;.- ,..7,-.:. '1',6-:'..'•..,,,,,r,-.,.,;,,,or, is'/,i;/,'' .4',/,o',/, '4.4;4;..:•...-.;,-1.; -...;', .' ,- .: -.• /,,...,-.,•ir.•• .. . ... . ••-•- ... ,.; .: .,. . .'.,6, -;"424 I"I.,'•"'.16;.- • "'"' ':' .:•-...T.'.. V. .' • IS.. ill'-''' [-.1e.- .•'-4:-., ,' :;.'--.'s'.-;c1;:;''-•:....t..g.'..:::!'-.. .,•-i"' ".• ''9,41114„,•. ' '.-..,.,.:,..- --...2:-'• -.. : • (.1) .. . . . . . - • - reit f!...r.....,,`CC • ,.,,p.:.,.....,:d ," ,„,,,,t, ,,,,.-, .,,,,,,,,,,,,,:-/..,.,„i.4%,,,,,,,,.4,,,./.,,,,,;,,, .:;,...,:.,,,., • -km 7"•••\'•-,,•. • _...._,ao# .:,%',....a.045:'•"-. ,..„,,w rr ,•••••••••. tx, , ••,,\ 5TH ,-,-.:4.c ...., • '..,-,S.:.•1 :-,,.:.: :. ,i:',.i.?.-.'.-.:, -,...,'..;'.;..fA, '',V t.,...iiii',,,,/4-,i,r..*.,.,..<0.,,-, ,c9--, .••--,.. ,, _-•-•- ••..- -4.70, ,f,i-• m .:;),APAW17.7.. :•:,‘.: ....--,.,k.i./),,..,:I..4; ' 1 .1'1,-;-..:1'. :.:'::if. 15111.,' ..f.,,;':::..;••..:1!:4;•i.:„.?.: ,.1;'''''',.,:..11.:;.:.',....F.;-..;:!2•113/.1/t.,..q.,,1,./i:: : 10114'','',:::e:fro,...;::::':'::.i.,:A.:, 1‘.-....A 1•',1•Az •..1,•-,•-,' ,:;.-g - A ..,!., .'-.,-: -..,,k,,-.:-,8•i•1:,-..•: : ,_.'-4-.:-.4.0., ,',.*.•.'"'',' - ---!'-'-:.••••,,h•I'•' At.i.• , •'r'.4,t•AP;p4•••".•P-47••-•-:-.---!;-•,-.. &:1 An ,.,...,,.:.z,,,..;.••-•,„,••••/#,.0 „.,,,.. -,. ,•,.,.•;•.,0"4..,,,,,I,likate, ._.,.......,,..,... . .. :,,..r....-„,:$1,,,,f.w:„..,,,,, ..,,,,..•4.,,1 ..;,p,,,,,ti-yrio.44,,, ,..,-;....-'. .. ' ::-:',1,,,,, s'.,.., :::-..k:, •, f,r','Il ',"-7:-.- ,t):),:!'- i ..Z.'-'- ''s-2tc y..-.,-;,-4,;:---,..'.--S,.. ;-"* "lig''0, -ti el'f iv.' '7 0,,,,,,,,•p,..- -,..-.71?-:",, F,-, . -.,,,,,,,,., ,..,„ -,- „ n_ .$, '''''' 1 Z 7 - i'-.1,47.:1-. ' :,.'..X ,:".''.:' 41,,,,;(.-....•-i ,,.,1..:1;-`...J.c.'',:>,. .'.: . i.,?...k.cr '....,.V.T.. , .,,'..5.-• . ' ''''1-":',.A.'-'7,'''''e!.."4, •R p',149.r,%..1-e0,4t6:-:'-'4;. ':-:---....-,:'...:-...;,.'' 'wli.;;{$.-/-jr71,4 t, .:4.'-' N '' fr ,sr .....141e, .,,... ....,-;;;;;;., ..a i ,4.cm,,, .,•%.:,,.. ..xt'FL-0 .., ;...,.. .-::•:.7Q;:::S.,-7.1. . ... '/141-k,r;..'',AiAit,W!.01.4.4!Vlittt.410,. ./0.--A!Iffg.kg#4.414t.i Fr i 4 .........z....„.„,,, ..„_,..,,,.,,,i , :z. . .;:, ;._...,,,..............1,; ,.„.„ :,,;.1;-;.:,...%. 46V..' in f.,'":"p. •%i.",'::..c'..T!,-4,..1,6-';', . ..i*.-.,:.6'.'..'"'.. .f..''''. ,,k1 '.' ..--.1-7.!.7:7.,.-.....;,,,_;,....:;...4...7:.,........i:,,:::.f..71.......:.....?..),:i.i,f1.,....;,;..?....„:;,:,:.".X.,;,... t.-....4....y.. ...:.'V.:3•.',.., ..,.?....:-i,;-..r..;-..;,:it.r.."..-•,- ,,Ns4.:, ,..,!-',r.: A;.....:$4q •i i,;ig; Pgi.:,,,...4 61,„:1:-•:•'D„,•t....0:11,!,:;,... 7.::.,K.'. . • '11.'1,•,..,1.7i.-i./0.i i,..;!f)...E(:...,,,,.V„...,.,,'.q,L.Y..s..":-,.:..-.::.. .::'..':.•:.,:..,.T,.•:.;,gs 1:.v t,.;(,4-'s..'!'..;-.'.•!".,,,',,,,:.,..5,,,y,..;..,1$.7:..,F,,A-..,.'N(.-4--,",z;,..,-.:;,,,,, ,.it,,V.f f i::;.;:'.!cii*fig'. 'Aki.,&, ',::4114;,7.,.,'.-''-'p4'':.k2.i.,*;',5'.-:4W.F.O0,'''''..;4u17'i'.;;;•,::f:/.;i''l•.k:"c.::i 7,.,,;',,.•. - .,.O... il*.,. -Site . --.../-'.,..-.•-.V''::',";:,^;.%'.:... .,://. ii.'- I....$7;Ji ' .fi' ta:::,' '.:. ;-4,,.z.2,tr,i'q:74(3,0,-ei4 •.-.. •-',' ,, • ' • ..:-.-. - • • ' , :••••••"'•••: . ,..:-..•..,1.-.•,.v.,,.; ....;-/-4 ,'• :.1pf ,ip"?.;•-••• •Iff'"!1J,•,/:./ui. • r-lf.aiSgfgiRVir41.'74Y,P,;::• ,,,' '':.S.:: .'':.1; I:.OCI":•7 ••• ,....... '•:.:Ir. ''' . --'..- •-..''''''.7---' . ...;.... •-,,,, - .• --.• ..,-.,-,•,:,,••••,.....,....:•f....*P. ‘....t...T••,,,,. i, :“cf,',.;',0741,Ti •..r.' r rt. .././1.1 r,r44.O',. - ..:V,', .........:, ..,•..., ..,-., ,... ..":".‘. •,,•••;,..4.0,5Y116..' -,...,.., ..--'•••'--..:...p,.;'.•f',......•'S..•••.,i..;,..'6i .,.:',1; ,..4.11..-.,:;•;.4... .:,p,,-, ..,.,,,g :.,,..i. ii,,.4,;go; r!r!.;:','.-.•'....r.,,::...•.,.' if:,55 ••...-' r•:'. 'tc',..; ...• ., , •- -10''''* -1. ••,-;',.•'-'.''.-:.:-•.':'•/•' '.i -•''''•CEIIT.E I?-r'r'''='••••-•:1'.41-:-,...••,:r.r.i r:F.,,'-'•: •;',.."P.' .-•:4,;;;k:'•:1::::,:.A.::;"..:nr•r-i. ''.'.;.is •:.:-'...8 04••••,.1•';':-... ..•- -4(' :.... • • •". .'10/"'"'' . ..-•-:.;,r,.:,::;:,.-,-Wr....,.,.... . •..,:r.,..-: . ..-r.i.r.lr,•:,.,... „.,,,p,;:, ; ..•:,,,../4,4',`,'„,.,,:-/h.;..,.'ci,-,..,;.,.,.„:'• '.'..:;•'• r•-•,,• ,...;'%::....:',-: E • Rio . •i..":11::,-,-,....',S. '.•::, ON-.V.11.4•AGE:.•Plf•1? ,:.:.-•• ;,....-.:,..-1.•-•-• •,:•'.1:',17'q'......;:•:,',".....,.....• "•:•::.: •:-•-•...'...":.,:',' ,.-...:;.•:-.:-..4.' ,...,.... . . .... .. . : .....".• ig ..• ' . 6)<<s •'../.0. „,/: \)' '. : • '-4 • -•" - -4,i,...,,,-„.- ..-.. . -. '..'.."•,'•'.C4;!-• ••:7,.V.1,0,i';•'• •••,Z'•',.:::•••;:',.,',-!•'-•, .• ;',•• ••••,,,,,'••••,:;;.•,;••• •.. .. .<0!• •:•,,,,.:...•',,, ,. . •,. ,„„„...,,,,I.;" .•-, •...,.5.,....... ,:-..,-•40 4'P''../0i ii:q/^1 4-.13,.,:.;,...';,!:../.•,,-....: ••-;:...,,,'2!!,,'-',.- .. P. . . • !.• -..0 i '''''';'''...til • , ......7.--''''e,",I •',./. . r.rt,,,,.,......4%.,0,4,,,,, 1,••••./..0:4-,.f.,,.7f,,%ft:c'i. •••,....,,i,--...,4•0•:,•••,-;i.7',:.3, ..11:'.F.:27/4110 :1.1::.1 '.'‘...:V. litt,.--,40 7..1.-':,...',:: z•t: :vigoiy:.4 ii.e.0,../.:;:-.,,..,,, ...,,,,.-,%:; ..,„...:...,.::; ... '.,c,... , -.,; e•,.„.... .. • . . .., .•• .. .•-•••••-I, • - ••• •••• - • I.:••••.•....;;:•.•:,. virk ••;.•1•11•••441411: 'Nk;:ya,,,,t,,,../,!••4,t; - .A.,•,•.,.--',f.ii....:•••:•.•:••• ,%.• • ....a.;.• 4'•.....--....-il .1•7;:h•:,4.:••••: . '.....,:.:i44..a.'s ''.:•:',:".;1,,'..?A'.•,:' ca'..:','.'."P:':1/,41.!,0•!•,:i/AU.,`.4•P,.•;.•-.;-•,,:.1......':?... .,.;.4,:-.•:......:•;, '. . : ': ..' . \‘.., .. fro, -s-,v- •'..- 1* ..., ._.... -..• .....- .,--,,-• :4,.',..--.. -....:- •-•,•,',.1, ..',. ,, .,......,,.,......,;:,,-4 .', ? *1 ' :. .! .. ..•• :;'1, • • • " --t, SC, 0,.. . . . • " ' • - A' :,. z,,, ... ,,14:1:........c,%:•;,,,,A: ,,•p.••.;;.,...:?.....,:.'.. ' '''. :2( ,, , . ..,,,.. - 'V el" cr. . ' SE - • 4,, . -- . • ' C .. . . C7 w % -a • ./ -. . ... ., ,. .. 1.5TH,..%1 .,,.....:z.,.....::::.•:•:...-;,..;•. ' ..• . t• ' t ... c:3 ,..; • . % (k- i'e40 6cz, P41,• 00/Gs .. . a SE- ‘ wit/a 1 40.-•:-,,Sr. .. - ':•\.4 ".,14:..4 . 8 v? ,,.. i e-r.i. -',..-'. .-..,..',. '-. •••••0.-i.4.•:%/-'..6;) ,:g..',-,;:,,, .. •:. - . .. : .,.. :'-'. LI .. 44 W IS)N% ''' • • 4 .-..z.:w,J.-7,5: . irti, .:_,. 2.0 im.i.i...-..1 1,•,,,,,..".,:i.4,,v,„.0/.,.7.4.:-.';:::,'':;.:.,,,,...,.;.-:-'. . ..' ,. .•., • -,i-fs ....ru: t .,-. , .,, : .,4- ':- el;s;:rtgli 44,2,,-.-.•:;;; '•' .4.-0,-.?,.R.i-.;••,...1 , _ .,. .• ;.:••;: e••-•,:',0 ,..,4,i1 •,,,/.. '4•„•::?:/;,,:,0;;;; ..1r:,,•,,,,,,H•m:••••, ,!....•.. ••• ..,,•....'..i.'..-•,:i::..*••• 16....- ••et:'• '. •-,.Es' c.f. It....-',;:.''•.J , •iii''...',..''..:•:..: . : ,..-; "% q'',..,•,••':••..., ..'.!.5..e;,. '4.':...,.-. • .g,•1h, '4t...:'• ' ', :::!•*;"•,,..;18'4174111/Mws..-• ' .. . ...., •t•.....,- • --- " .15;--,:-•-•'? f•• -,..-"--yr-iiihsir"),.11-:__.,4';•"'1.','.' "4:ti',.,,,../,P.Ti.',::',2•:';•.,";,..':,.:',.,./ .4..K.,•,,•,, .ik.... .;..,;;,:i„e;.,%•!;•.,„44 0/ ;?6...•'...s';',,FM, W .,......;:,, ,,... .,,,,,,,t ...,,j4 -'.......,....T.'••,;.. iTiFf:'„',- ." ''..-.':::-. •'::•••!'•:17:7 '.',..i...-..f.:•,:-.:i.:•::-:::•_.•... ':St,7.:•••• c-.1,".",/::::',..;',•1';'. 1/ 4`• .... ,. 4' •s• cr qt. .,..- , .6 .-:;':47,11.;,:o'..i.''..,,"iii;,••.,.,.' ),..',,g.7. . %.*..41.•:?;,;00.',i'„'•:,'.4i; ....- ...':',. Sr,'';,...,;,::-,'.',:'::,.,..?.,..'..; &le',,:i,,,,../i.,.:44 ,.,,. .4.. ' `,./. . ;t3 us, c> _ :;"..;,11.•:^:Si:1, ,c.f.;w.d.' ,P.::'.•`-. '1 ..,,',.,:4,, 'ia..i::. ..04,. .• . ...i.,..• '•'..Y.• .'-':',.,,,,..../. __angrier...":'....,..;c.•.,..,,,.. .', ;' ... 4 . 4, c i - . - . S• E 157TH ST . Se ,• ,,,s-.... .:19 . • , , •-7.7.0:70..•;•,, .1 ...'.:-."•,,..'. .. •••:•( .,•:-.7:•• ••• •72 .•,.•.,', ',. 1.1t:. ...,.. :'." 's_.*5 QC, • ,. r-r-;; ' ..-• .- 2011/ Iiitl-"' 1 ... ••.,:.;"re :. * i!..',. ;,g .• ,,;,,,,,y,,, pm, ,, :,. .-. ts • ,e. c., ..1 •oe r ,4'. 71 . •ift,.. Pi. :P..• v. •1 nn • C-1 Di =•-r ,P ..."-• I i Et -''' SE 21ST ,44.' .... 4,,t‘.1.. A"."... Renton Hill Neighborhood Meeting 10 acres SE Beacon Way Name Address i f of `f WV 4�`. 1 4Z; ,. "7 f�_' ' 7' i--- Oy /7' XAu . 5605 - . ai 44 c - 6 2. 0- RA,- P.-- 6 , 0 3-S > ) a7.1 4.--e-2,---)itr : e A. K ---._./-:- 5rq,/.4e; " v:,,,.,-7.--7- 4-4w.efoe 44/,s//// gaz4),a/,i ,9f:G2 : ..- 707 i Go . 2r ? a;s= - , g<fA.frIve,-", I-- E4c., ea_i_ :. lir 14.,174 avc.46- - qtp.s-.5'7-- _ : Jne-/z--- "). -IL-K______ ' Ec ` - 7s3 t) ( 00 5"L e' T 16- /-1 6 dry $ .100-- -4, ,p &Crab ?i /Vl gep. 7ras-L . F ,4- 09 vv t s : / ' 3 5 7 z"1-1 4 sue />6.,? 0 cv(IPPlci-o-tte f -- ( '' 5 7 14 li <ftir°4-zi C firti s GeILLii-l-Ii ISo S. 91# CO-- q 1-U s-*G 9 417 Olt ic p . :. di,/ £ , 4/2O C- �r %I', .-% _i �� Vi 5 9 t - -5 - .e l WO . 5 7-# 5--/-- (3- dkkeu 11 [2 Se ;-. . Aiy, Q A;"# 4? e h niiii� Ply-,.,v� s r .irs • / la" (9'4- i 3 S i 971 7. 0---'- . ' .. ' ' pb,e 627 I-lib 4 /4 S, '( i 1 4-.9 si— . . . , . . , . Renton Hill Neighborhood Meeting 1 10 acres SE Beacon Way Name Address bc,„6,_,,, ‘1�b l i T pro RJTo,J A . 51 a1 ',-k Z.14 6,Ser &k�o I- BUS. G A--L' A-06 . 417 / -,e&FP J of 2s ,v WAy g-. -V,_)k\ ----3-n\Akk st 1/4-, /(1?-<- &z.a.0 p k-‘- kmA SC3- ,‘#),(1/7s /72 s 74 r i 30 - 5-g ? ,&iM2t 2?2ii,// , .2) 4010- dee; 5• _;4 Ad /111:6C b?'32* A4Griri /41/N f V—tt/' ra . . 62-'4 c fa _ , , J " 0-,,._.2_, N,>,....„ 356 cu. .4,„AK, _. Z,c-„ ,,,, s r .( , c L \b C- `--` kt - 1INA u oo . 433 ceoou- Ave . S �,vaoh, '& s 4-33 ( kv AveS. Piukta- 14-41-044 ei- 1 ttbi—T4-ki Plamriin 7 ,11T71-. T a. �� l . 0,n) (cc!0. J •-54cc2) it.)/1-(1 5 £C' i* .-S�e1!y ,UCH 5 ZS 14 t3L. (�v-e E. `Zen'bn i W A 9'bo5� / INI /V W/t / 170 6€q jr E. S i (��v o.�5 k_644( c�a, S-23 R �4N Ao L S. ki..N�0*-1 W A °c lie CuvlAc;\lh•e. GR- C Rvk_ S• .$os- ec l4_ k,2 k41 S Ca1- ' CM- ( &live,— cf i 1 ._e,,,kekr KC4 L q t s l'l v\ StAr L it e Lit 'V ce--d, - p• Renton Hill Neighborhood Meeting 10 acres SE Beacon Way Name Address l/P ee/1/ ez/ S C7 ,IIQ L a 7 JI) Ar'1-oku IS 0 7 S 74 'c_4- 1980 61 �v��J 212SONJ ) 10-1 S 4' " Sr ADS"S 16 4,e14(01-PS 33d - �� ,� /_kir r' AWN621WOS - v7 w , 2Ms- �1 U� aikow5 S c7(/ T/0 /1- 9ks 94.QA4 / _ Wa ' 933 &ch.- �ve S. !? e) �✓p r►.a � Cam.//o�� 9800. . ea,± 3"35 e ige-itZw 9ros:-.5- 44 n /64 y(0, Rend . '3 TZ`.o 1/1aztj tOg_k - 3/0 1 ile S j_aiTr{--(11e)e/c_A3/O T e i?wI AreS. ?wcrNac ibodeau logo 44- S. °IgoSS Heritage Arnold Public Meeting 11/04/99 Public comments made during meeting: 1. Renton Hill community leader-Ruth Larson 2. Traffic access,most streets have one lane on Renton Hill 3. Traffic study 4. 1970's gates were open for 8 months,traffic doubled, one cop had to direct traffic during rush hour. Closed gates 5. 1980's Falcon Ridge development increased crime rate " 6. Gate is open in morning by Falcon Ridge for school bus access 7. Cedar Ave has very limited access 8. Renton Ave has very limited access 9. If development is approved, increase construction traffic will not leave room for _ emergency access 10. City of Seattle controls pipeline and roadway improvements 11.Renton tax payers will pay for Seattle to tear up road for repairs on pipeline 12. Were will the access point be on School property? 13.Neighbors will try to stop access to School property 14.Very low crime due to limited access 15.Renton Hill community want more studies done on development 16.Renton Hill community wants more info from City of Renton 17.Renton Hill community to address concerns with City of Renton 18.Renton Hill community has open forum at Hearing 19. R8 zoning at top of range, R5-8 per net acres 20. Can Comp Plan be changed to lower density? 21. Only multi-family allowed is duplex&townhomes 22. Is park space required? 23. City of Seattle will not grant access,unless City of Renton requested 24. Will City of Renton require curb/sidewalk on Seattle pipeline 25. What if no access is granted by Seattle? 26. Size of lots? 27.Another meeting w/more specific input, better info? 28. Are there stop lights, signs in proposal? 29. How many new school children will live there? 30. City of Renton Fire Dept./Police Dept. against opening gates. 31.Not,one Falcon Ridge representative showed. 32. Traffic&open gate biggest concern 33. Renton Hill community wants no development 34. If traffic was lowered development might be accepted 35. SEPA concerns,wildlife • • 1,y1 8 Moira Jr...011.1 • ra..a 1 $ chi n�al � 9144 • ' 1140 .• r ' c9. �j Y , • • et, \ . sb7Z6 ® '�'/ev-a .eti hi4; \\s. 40a e ar ivalic1217 0� 9f o 0o W�Q *1124 141 / .• .1 41 .N 1 of +aY+I sl,g •cec 9 414 1 ç__1> ' ti- r -I.I t\,g) ,4(‘v. • dy '� : +-4 11 cf b B L 3..‹ 'N.:\ . . 4,V , . g1� _ _ _,.-0 II l • , . .- - � �u _ - µ , .� \' '\ . 1 l 0 _ s � me .._....„ . ,,.... ..,. Ni t•-0 rl1 .. Igo • rT *PAS c . Tr /. . . . el o' • • alp .` . t44 141110 VI • ...___ iiiii4 April 3, 2000 Dwight Potter Falcon Ridge Homeowners Association 2100 SE Eighth Renton, W A98055 Re: Development of Renton School District Property Dear Mr. Potter: On behalf'of Bennett Development and the Renton School District,we wish to take this _ opportunity to bring you up to speed with our development plans for the school property-across -:: - . _ _ , • - from Phillip Arnold Park.We would welcome the opportunity to meetyou and a small group of citizens to discuss the design aspects of the proposed development: We have enclosed two black line drawings and a colored rendering,which represent,our proposed plan for the development.This plan is based on-the.following goals created-based on Citizen and City Staff input. . . of:, : Goals `' • • ' • ♦ Support the Neighborhood goal of keeping Beacon Way South closed to through traffic. ♦ Support the City's goal of precluding access to the nevv.development off of Beacon Way . South ♦ Support the City's requirement for a fire truck access off of Beacon Way South to the south - of the gate. -' . • Address neighborhood concerns about the 5-way road intersection on SE 7t and Beacon Way SE. ... ♦ Provide a transition between the park and the new development • Provide a transition between the homes in River Ridge with the new development. We believe that the proposed plan achieves these goals and that the Plan is sensitive to the surrounding homes and park. As you review the plan you should be able to see how it accomplishes the following results: - 1. The 5-way intersection is reduced to a 4-way intersection 2. A portion of Beacon Way South is closed to traffic and creates additional public open space 3. Access to the new development is at a point most distant from the River Ridge development, allowing the maximum buffer. . 4. Access is maintained to the Phillip Arnold Park parking access 5. A significant setback from the Homes in the new development to the existing homes on, Renton Hill and the Intersection on SE 7th is created. - - B ennett • Development 9 Lake Bellevue Dr Suite 100-A.Bellevue WA 98006 • Tel: 426-709-6669 • Fax: 426-709-6663 Mr:Dwight Potter April 3,2000 Page 2 of 2 6. A community fence and landscaping tract along Beacon Way South is created to screen the homes from the park and provide the new neighbors with privacy. This proposed tract includes areas set aside for increased intensity of buffer landscaping to allow for large trees and a varied landscape along the property facing the park. 7. The number of homes,which back up to the park is minimized and their angle to the park allows for a more random and varied for the community as, viewed from the Park. 8. A 15 wide Landscape Buffer is provided along the property line adjacent to the homes in the River Ridge development. . Our plan is to submit a formal application to the City of Renton by mid April. . If you would like to set up a time to meet with us,or comment on the plans,you can reach me at • 425-709-6559. Sincerely, ', BENNETT DEVELOPMENT .. a '/ -%4 . Chris Austin -. ' Vice President _ . . • Cc: Elizabeth Higgins Debra Aungst • • A • • 12) Wsi April 3, 2000 Douglas Bergquist River Ridge Homeowners Association 1801 SE Seventh Renton, WA 98055-3954 Development of Renton School District Property Dear Mr. Bergquist: - On behalf of Bennett Development and the Renton School District,we wish to take_this. opportunity to bring you up to speed with our development plans for the school property,-across from Phillip Arnold Park. We would welcome_the opportunity to meet you and a small group of citizens to discuss the design aspects of the proposed development. We have enclosed two black line drawings and a colored rendering,which represent our proposed plan for the development.This plan is based on the following goals created ibased on Citizen.and City Staff input. Goals • Support the Neighborhood goal of keeping Beacon Way South closed to through traffic. • Support the City's goal of precluding access to the new,development off of Beacon Way South • !Support the City's requirement for a fire truck access off of Beacon Way South to the south of the gate. • !Address neighborhood concerns about the 5-way road intersection on SE 7th and Beacon Way SE. • Provide a transition between the park and the new development • Provide a transition between the homes in River Ridge with the new development. We'believe that the proposed plan achieves these goals and that the Plan is sensitive to the surrounding homes and park. As you review the plan you should be able to see how it accomplishes the following results: • ' 1. The 5-way intersection is reduced to a 4-way intersection 2. ;A portion of Beacon Way South is closed to traffic and creates additional public open space 3. Access to the new development is at a point most distant from the River Ridge development, allowing the maximum buffer. . 4. 'Access is maintained to the Phillip Arnold Park parking access 5. A significant setback from the Homes in the new development to the existing homes on Renton Hill and the Intersection on SE 7th is created. B e nn ett Development 9 Lake Bellevue Dr Suite 100-A Bellevue WA 98006 • Tel: 426-709-6659 • Fax: 426-709-6663 • Mr:Douglas Bergquist April 3,2000, Page2of2 6. A community fence and landscaping tract along Beacon Way South is created to screen the homes from the park and provide the new neighbors with privacy. This proposed tract includes areas set aside for increased intensity of buffer landscaping to allow for large trees and a varied landscape along the property facing the park. 7. The number of homes,which back up to the park is minimized and their angle to the park allows for a more random and varied for the community as, viewed from the Park. 8. A 15 wide Landscape Buffer is provided along the property line adjacent to the homes in the River Ridge development. • Our plan is to submit a formal application to the City of Renton by mid April. If you would like to set up a time to meet with us,or comment on the plans,you can react me at 425-709-6559. Sincerely, BENNETT DEVELOP I NT Qr-e(2-4-JPI ct"-"1-1:141' Chris Austin : Vice',President Cc: Elizabeth Higgins .; Debra Aungst S • 4 • • April 3, 2000 Ruth Larson President, Renton Hill Community Association 714 High Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re:Development of Renton School District Property Dear Ms. Larson: ' ' On(behalf of Bennett Development and the Renton School District,we wish to take this - opportunity to bring you up to speed with our development plans for the school property across - . _ from Phillip Arnold Park. We would welcome the opportunity to meet you and a small group.of-- _ - . citizens to discuss the design aspects of the proposed development. , • We.have enclosed two black line drawings and a colored rendering,which represent our proposed_. - _ plan for the development.This plan is based on the following goals createdJbased on Citizen and City Staff input. , • Goals -♦ !Support the Neighborhood goal of keeping Beacon Way South closed to through traffic. • Support the City's goal of precluding access to the'new„development off of Beacon Way . . South ♦ !Support the City's requirement for a fire truck access off of Beacon Way South to the south of the gate. ' • !Address neighborhood concerns about the 5-way road intersection on SE 7th and Beacon Way jSE. : ' • Provide a transition between the park and the new development • Provide a transition between the homes in River Ridge with the new development. We believe that the proposed plan achieves these goals and that the Plan is sensitive to the surrounding homes and park. As you review the plan you should be able to see how it accomplishes the following results: 1. The 5-way intersection is reduced to a 4-way intersection 2. A portion of Beacon Way South is closed to traffic and creates additional public open space 3. Access to the new development is at a point most distant from the River Ridge development, 'allowing the maximum buffer. 4. Access is maintained to the Phillip Arnold Park parking access 5. A significant setback from the Homes in the new development to the existing homes on !Renton Hill and the Intersection on SE 7th is created. B e nn ett Development 9 Lake Bellevue Dr Suite 100-A Bellevue WA 98006 • Tel: 426-709-6659 • Fax: 426-709-6563 - Ms:Rath Larson April 3,2000 Page 2 of 2 6. A community fence and landscaping tract along Beacon.Way South is created to screen the homes from the park and provide the new neighbors with privacy. This proposed tract includes areas set aside for increased intensity of buffer landscaping to allow for large trees and a varied landscape along the property facing the park. 7. The number of homes,which back up to the park is minimized and their angle to the park allows for a more random and varied for the community as,viewed from the Park. 8. A 15 wide Landscape Buffer is provided along the property line adjacent to the homes in the River Ridge development. _ Our plan is to submit a formal application to the City of Renton by mid April.- • - • If you would like to set up a time to meet with us,or comment on the plans,you can reach me at 425-709-6559. , Sin rely. BENNETT DEVELOPMENT k` Chris Austin .. z Vice President Cc: Elizabeth Higgins ' j Debra Aungst I , • I BEGINNING OF FILE L fit:t ? ''3 1v. F - r r r -t s -v ' s,• ` ,is • I •