HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_Environmental_Checklist_Logan Six_220330_v1.pdfSEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does
not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You
may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers
to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making
process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate
the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The
checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an
adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
A. Background [HELP]
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Logan 6
2. Name of applicant:
Andrew Kovach AIA
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 1 14
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
2115 Colby Ave. Everett WA, 98201
4. Date checklist prepared:
2/28/22
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Planning Division City of Renton.
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction start spring 2023, completion spring 2024
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Site Survey conducted by Pacific Coast Surveys, Inc, Mill Creek WA
Geotechnical Investigation and Report performed by Cobalt Geosciences LLC Kenmore, WA
Site Drainage Study by IECO Inc. Everett, WA
Project Traffic study conducted by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Everett WA
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Site Plan Review
Building Permit review
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.)
Development will include 124 below building, near grade, and on grade parking, Access to these levels will be taken
directly from N 3rd St. and N 4th St. Waste management and loading access is proposed from N 4th St. Approximately
6,300 sf of commercial space is currently planned at ground floor level including office area and concierge facilities. Above
a total of 105 apartment units are proposed within a 6 story structure. Apartments are slated to be 60% standard and 40%
senior accommodations. Roof top amenities are currently planned to take advantage of available territorial views and to
create functional open space for tenants.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
302 Logan Ave. N Renton WA 98055 NE 1/4 of Section 18, Township 23 N, Range 5E WM.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 2 14
B. Environmental Elements [HELP]
1. Earth [help]
a. General description of the site:
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
The geotechnical soils report describes soils conditions to be stable to depths greater than 20’ overlaying areas of potential
liquefaction as generally found throughout the area.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
8,308 cubic yards total excavation for below grade parking, 577 cubic yards total fill for landscaping. Fill source will come from
excavation with top coating from landscape planting sources.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Erosion will be minimal, with earthwork mostly contained within the boundaries of the below grade parking structure.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
62.28 % (28,455 Building or paved surfaces)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Minimal erosion is expected, site preparation will be limited to surface grading and below grade parking utilizing all erosion
control and monitoring measures necessary to ensure protection of soil stockpiles surrounding properties and public ways.
2. Air [help]
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Those typical of a development of this nature, from combustion engine equipment, tools, and construction vehicles.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 3 14
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None known
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Limit construction to City prescribed days and hours of operations.
3. Water [help]
a. Surface Water: [help]
1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No streams have been identified on the subject parcel. The Cedar River is mapped crossing Logan Ave. N approximately 450 feet to the
south of the parcel at the nearest point before flowing northwest and north across the valley area adjacent to Renton Municipal Airport and
discharging to the Lake Washington one mile from the subject parcel. No other bodies of water or wetland areas are known to be in the
vicinity of the site.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
No.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
b. Ground Water: [help]
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 4 14
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No streams have been identified on the subject parcel. The Cedar River is mapped crossing Logan Ave. N approximately 450 feet to the
south of the parcel at the nearest point before flowing northwest and north across the valley area adjacent to Renton Municipal Airport and
discharging to the LAke Washington one mile from the subject parcel. No other bodies of water or wetland areas are known to be in the
vicinity of the site.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe.
No, all surface water from the site will be conveyed via storm drainage pipes to the City’s storm drainage system. Natural infiltration will
have a minimal effect on subsurface water table or drainage patterns.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any:
By utilizing industry standard and code required erosion control and monitoring measures as necessary to ensure protection of slopes
and soil stockpiles
4. Plants [help]
a.Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
____deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
____evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
____shrubs
__X_grass
____pasture
____crop or grain
____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
__X__other types of vegetation (Himalayan Blackberry)
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
All existing vegetation will be stripped and replaced with landscaping.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 5 14
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
None.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
Himalayan Blackberry
5. Animals [help]
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site.
None.
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
No.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
None known of.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None N/A.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None N/A.
6. Energy and Natural Resources [help]
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 6 14
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
7. Environmental Health [help]
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
1)Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
2)Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located within the project area and in the vicinity.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the project.
None.
4)Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
5)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None necessary.
b. Noise
1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Renton Municipal Airport, arterial traffic, Renton Memorial Stadium use, and airplane testing from Boeing Field .
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site.
Those typical of a development of this nature, during construction from combustion engine equipment, tools, and construction
vehicles, after completion vehicular access and parking.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None necessary. Added noise will be minor in comparison to editing noise levels.
8. Land and Shoreline Use [help]
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 7 14
a.What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
The site is vacant and has historically been vacant. Nearby use is airport, sports facilities, aircraft manufacturing and general office,
industrial manufacturing, and senior center, Additional adjacent uses include business occupancies and to extent primarily single
family residences towards the east.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted
to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or
nonforest use?
No.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
None
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
UC-2 Urban Commercial.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
CMU Commercial Mixed Use.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 8 14
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any:
9. Housing [help]
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Housing is proposed for the site.
10. Aesthetics [help]
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
91’-4” from public sidewalk level to the top of the proposed elevator penthouse. A combination of stucco and architectural
metal panels.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
Varying views looking west towards Renton Municipal Airport, Renton Memorial Stadium, Boeing Facilities, and territorial
vistas beyond would be partially blocked from nearby single family residences. Views from the noted areas looking east
would be partially blocked to varying single family areas and territorial vistas beyond.
b.Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
The structure has been divided into two main segments joined together with a 70 ft. wide “bridge” of upper level floors
breaking up the perceived scale of the structure and allowing areas of transparency.
11. Light and Glare [help]
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
At sunrise and sunset on clear days limited amounts of reflection will take place off glazing areas, the windows are residential
in scale with large areas of separation between.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 9 14
No. Minimal traffic routes face directly toward the direction of limited glare anticipated at sunrise and sunset during certain
times of the year.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A.
12. Recreation [help]
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Liberty Park is .4 miles from the subject property, Cedar River Park is .6 mile from the subject property, Philip Arnold Park is
1.1 miles from the subject property, Highland Park is 1.2 miles from the subject property, Gene Coulon Memorial Beach Park
is 1.1 miles from the subject property
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Common amenity areas and roof top terrace areas will be provided in addition to private decks.
13. Historic and cultural preservation [help]
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so,
specifically describe.
No.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources.
No. The site historically was Burlington Northern Railway ROW and has been vacant for several decades.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
None, N/A.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
None. The site is highly disturbed.
14. Transportation [help]
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 10 14
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Interstate 405 to Logan Ave. N to N 3rd St. entrance and N 4th St. entrance.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Yes, direct access from the building to public transportation on Logan Ave. N.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
124. None.
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
Yes, Renton Municipal Airport, Boeing Renton Plant Facilities, And Lake Washington boating transportation opportunities.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates?
799 Average daily trips. AM Peak:43, PM Peak 70. No commercial or non-passenger vehicles are anticipated other than
standard delivery services. Report derived from data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip
Generation Manual, 10th Edition + Supplement (2020).
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
No.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
Implement car share program for tenant use and make a public transportation access assistance plan available to all tenants.
15. Public Services [help]
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
Not to a great extent proportional to the surrounding density. There will be an incremental increase based on the number of
units added to the public service district.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None beyond providing onsite common areas and meeting all State and jurisdictional fire and life safety codes.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 11 14
16. Utilities [help]
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,
other ___________
b.Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.
City of Renton:sewer, water, and storm. Power: Puget Sound Energy and Seattle City Light. Waste Management: City of Renton solid
waste division.
C. Signature [HELP]
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature: ___________________________________________________ .....
Name of signee __Andrew S. Kovach AIA___________________________________________
Position and Agency/Organization _Principal Architect Kovach Architects
Date Submitted: __________
D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions [HELP]
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 12 14
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 13 14
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) July 2016 Page of 14 14