Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA99-178 I • I �.Y PPP—SS—TTTT ' c CITY OF PROPERTY MAP EXHEfT — \ AM- RENTON t+ sa.• ''}: I—.W--' ��' cm� y�ea��oro wK wens Howe ��'' N0. '' REVISION 8Y DATE APPP xPc W'�• Cragp Zrm V.E.Admi b1 br _�•� _ . .. ••t' .0 1 \ `' Io, •'\ j11 \ I I/I\\\\\\�oM \\{III ICI\II\I\\III1y._ m I 1???T II y.0 I t u.c or swats aro.im.mNPnw�arw i'. I \ a` \ \\ 11 II// / l1 II11I\\,ll\\del\q .•. ! \ \ , 111 I II /II1 1 / I I1 I1\1.111\\1,,III]\ ._„ / / ;JI11IIII\ 1I 1 / ; I II \II \\, m, _• '••.`I" 1 1 1 1 :III 1 11 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 i A`VIII\: -7s II�'ir o1i!', . _ I III III � I� I^^�� y ., , 11 f '.I ,7 I//Y// I 1 1 i / 1 I/, a`I` 1 e)I!,\i1\\1\ 1 E •••,I N . o. "-, 1 1 { 1 x I I./w t' 1 1 1 i t w8 j ir"Ir • I IeI , , 1II \, 11I•• �, =' 1 1 11))/ II I 1 I \ \ III// / III 1111 II\. L-, "1'.1- I . l1011\ \\ 111ll( I111 '111111 •••'L \ f 1 • ' 1,1\\ \I I I111\1\ 1)11111111 1I IiIlIiO • ''.l\ftIIII \\\ \ \ I \\\ III$(;\jI1,I ;>< �i1 l\I \'1' /!4'\\1\\\\ 1 \ 1\\\\\I`,'1\\\\\\ \\\\\�\�I i`- ��II!!!!: .��I,1 I,\ .Z, t \ \\\\\\I\\ 1 ' \\\\1 1 1\1• \ .* g \ 11j\ K •1 1::t.. O \\\` \\`\I 1 I I ; I 1 1\\I \$)1�j11 sDeea_ • \\\\l\\\\\\\1\ • ,11111 1 l//`,`•tiff11 11 za._®li :::I. I I II x o\1 1 1 t \,\, III HPIIII : I ,IIfI ' !g ".--j \0.('/' ril/ )///,/fl , 811 � 's.6a :1 '1 \ ,1 e', Ali\\Ilf.11 1 \ I 3$ wa :•'le //. ' i ;(\' ,f ( ; ' IIIII /1111I I• i( ' i\ ) ,\ , '1\\ . \,\ \' \ 11111 E�aSe"se 1 \ I r Ill/I I: . is '/'/ ' '. Ij1 j1 I/' \\\( ,. /l y k.l _/ 1 /// , I1 11111'\ (tl/ ••-•,' ..' ''' ' / • ,',/ , ,i '//,/ .1,/ 11 :N-4 r i / `'I I/i l/l P' / O 1 1 1 l'l'/ .://i/ ' m .',Jill''(\ f 11r \ f , III A /////!i. .-' l / /02 / / / 7 j* 13 _ I I ! ' 1ri `lr 4 %i;1l , 1 �. / ///11•/ / r X COI ! ii , . ' 0yR `of eon AVENUE s,_ I.I\Il,',-. - e _ = ° g5,1 q' u OAkeS0 � -\15 -*• - 4 w. ... _ - y-, li /i w _R Ir1iI 1.4VeO w -\ I , /------------ a . • . . y 1 i _ , ( 7 . rs 1111 f . . i 1 1 1 o 1 l'1,st4.,:'`:','„, ,/ .:3: ' flI1 �Z ,m. . 1 7 ,,,,,.., W, ry `m TTTLE: LOCATION: NO SR 900 PROPERTY ' r 0 PGHAV• 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH eC 6 $ mP-- "' . (a 5)251 980322 M91�2510TH AVENUE SOUTH (425)251-8782 FAX SEATTLE,WA.98104 4 . 0 ., F CAL ENGINEERING.WO PLANNING.—E ''PO A.M. SURVEYING.ENNRONNENAL SLIMES .....-.. :. .iV>.Pxw.u->r.tx.u�[<xw....'�._.i U.., 1��.�... :;�.1'irry :.:' >a,. i.i.•.n•,....i. ?:•...ii?Isv-Pi. 1 • —.— —— 1— " PPP—SS—TTTT — r — -- --,---,----1. . " Lis, CITY OF PROPERTY MAP EXHIBIT • A-- '''''' -11\ ;AN RENTON — --. -- ..:. , • • NO ,.., . r,•,- '...5 REVISION BY DATE RATER •••••., BRA, &RAr - IIPC • ..4.:,. - . ....• j'' ', '''' . .• .. • / \ ) .111111 /0 1111110\0\- 7"' ,..-.... / Afg 1// ) IR Ili( \ \ \ il 0( 1 itillioill it, • q( ii /g/ )j \ \ \ III \ho \ \I\ctliii ," GGGDGM.T.2 _M Icccc \\\\\\'\ \\1"lii Imil ) '11" • $t \ H \ \ 1 \ 1 \ ' \;\ \\\ 1 \ \ \\\1 \\\\\ \\\‘\\ C) 15iRig I \I% It.\\\1 \ \ \ \ \\ , \\\\ t\\ ,/ ,,_ M15A3 g -:' 111 I \\'' , 0,\ \\\\\ \ \ I ,\\\ I ii()) / • \ \ ,\ \ ' ' \ II Ill 18 . weal \\$\;/so \i \\ \\\i\)\ 11 I I 1/\\\\)\111, \\; \ ) ,5 \,‘\ni, . i fl,\\ •\ ;r:` );U\;1/,( Him //401 - ,I) ,) ,-;‘,,/,/,/,/,)I I / Warn i /////// t '''7/ r r 0\ \( r ( / OH /),//7/ /2 1 .1::\\\\\\\ ,', \, , ,1,/,711 , ,,./ . //// ,,,' J J i ////// / „ /'// lilt/I/WI ' h // /., 477/ 1 / 4 .././_,- ,, • / ,,(;\ , ,/ p \ •- - -- r- • ., c•A .../ \ • •.,./74.'- tfir, '/L'--.'-'`N ) \( 1/).-/ // //I"V /4' .•.:/,:(->',/ 1,1111,1,,Ii,:,, v- :\'\11//,,,7',/:1/// ,Iy/ 2 esh, —I •,,.; AVENUEIfillii II I I -A- -- _---'4,,,v‘V .' / // 11 -- -';.*/-iP • - •t'/, -11 .- ' ,/ 77 ' '.1'11\11)-' ' ,---.. ;',' \Irt/ '?..,; /7/4:-),),(J,,,, ////:////////',////i///,,r..?,;,,,:_,,,,r,/ /:// _-' '/ ';.`.-;- ,. ' ____--1 4!.-_,,,'-'//////V 0,4/CeSb-A----------- T-fi----- _----7-=-7 ---_-':----- 3 Yk=,---,==--- „:"==--------7--- -'.5 :,-,-S---,. -', t _.•_ pi ....s.,,v. j. . {Jill ' LL 41z •S.W. -------.....____ /I i• /' 1 1 , • 1 • 7 , '''' c.• 0 /.:7 , ..,,,,, -/ .. •.1: / / • i g M i 0041 ' NOMA ...... ) I 6 At7e---•••••\. 'I\ •8.W.• '" En TRLE LOCATION: .,. HA& 5 z „,FG , S. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH MERUNO SR 900 PROPERTY i T , 41 „Auz, Ni. KENT,WA 98032 9125 10TH AVENUE SOUTH • —1 4 9, - 444' . ((442255r5i1T2 FAx SEATILE,WA.98104 x2. -,.• — ..=' 01 I IT .,,, ''',ftEw.)0-S ffax.E=,,,LX,V,TElts • B.C.E.JOB NO. 6759 CITY OF RENTON t- Planning/Building/Public Works ,,...,„ :„._;. ' `� 6 `` th Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 w JAB 2 T!4 �aglia r 0 , 0 5 ADDRESS SERVICE.-REQUESTED 71$$gpl u.5. PotTAGE REASON CHECKED pFTUgka 3ncl.ait1ed ro .811990=,O4OO4O8 R.efi,se<' _ tea!i' FLEE I.WOZbSIDE t C1a - ^ou n -833 SW SUNSET BI_V-H-40 j.' . S_c RENTON WA 98055-2296 Nc ` :`I • --- - _-. • f4c . De __ ._.,,utl its this ei,.'c , ��;RETURN �i/^ '^w�`..�...7+'.^I h �{+ '`�y Flo-=, ii �Tl� ,� ^ V6r's: //��V(vV 17 - � '9dyi^'.. '�1'll1li1i'ftlll1illt1l1lli�1l1 ti3:t::i:i:i:ilini:iidipii:i:':�:i� ii. + I - - ---- --- - --- - ---- .---- • • • • • 6 A �i i ♦ • 41-14 NOTICE OF.:-APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION:OF NON,- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLIN()COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,'as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice tha a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single co ment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significan e Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. , PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999• " : " •` NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January21,2000.. Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the.Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this • • non-project application.This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the -- - •. project description,that;Permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill -- - that Is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic • uses. :. <; .:. ... , Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. • 1 I IA 00 470 .MII N(1TIrc •. Development Regulations . Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development - regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I Zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure • standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Econcmic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION t_ ,}. xxva-a "i ixi.1 {mii P':o 1 :d cav �"u ! ' = r:6' n - ..7 .' Merlino SR 900 Property I ''� 'r .0 •---_. ` P i„aw;t15'« ;yet,,,. „ ..i"' , . •-J �'�,A.-•V �� °2''-'` V It `" Comprehensive Plan map 1 " � pj,�r Ir. ,,,o t � ,:r...,_ - [ 1 i t� '• °_,��'/j ' i ' 0 •. � = Amendment and Rezone I _'� , ri- ' y ai cjy; 4 I/'a5' j\'.4 1�. I.il. • 4 t:' `'I ' .�. 10 CV'- • ,. t31ACTs�'a o, Q 1 I_ I KZ0�. _\ 1 4 d •�. •� •' L , s wtno sr _ Tri C ��..: -- yam �No eT r 1-.- mGA • 1 I i 1 p �• • a . ; ::L 1-}.:� 1' mi I' I. .2r, I 1 b I,j: l 1,1. 13 : ,'� . I.�i --;'+-- —-,ram! 7;:.fir a i�° .. 'n' t i afnrt :.I: .,1;+k ri O� •1� `. }tl .� , lag v•..__-•^.;v_- •2¢ 'Ii'i qle:• i _�r:J► o '=•E4tiK61°114j,--_ 14, R- 4 ' � = ,t - . . ,��.. '[I l \ sTV I rp%:. , lu q -aL-,,.i,. �• r' 1 \� 1 {(• '+. �lc«••h) dl �� i K?d'��% p�9• I o-a,_ - ,* I i j;it' �_. ter'! Irl ...�, 1 tJ I I-ii�wr"' jr ��l �,I'r.��m A • tS /•• u•�, ��'Q 1�A •'. •,,• • ` .� „ •►' • m{°•a I ,'c-'14 d "f �? �� tiQ, M.. ,m': ;/T,�;'"^:..1.... :. .`R 4 .! • i3 '�"� - Fay , ,�' .• . ; ,• ,..,,..t•, I.0/ !Ie. q�iA; ::.= j •. '••CG rU� .:5 " Y Ox �•�.ir L .sc+'�..E- 7 A T a Y Mn .. ..• �'�' :• S Er..'n"'• 'o.. p41 W ' Y.I�[o _�-�' � m®� (Proposed) iL'4y �i°w1,0L` 'i-•;•:. 0.7,-- Y' I a•,, `'11:AO.i .�gl r , I 7 \ 1 1 } t i 1 r..:..3 ^ i- ♦,f A.4•'•••11,02' i` R• I p,,•, (r::-. it-„F'. • �4,y iea[ue. . ,�•, C,% \ �� -. ,,, q' ,,•• •.16 j,.i_:.,. • ...�. o..y:Rye +' 3io 1 actE.ILurot > �` ::-B/. yyt;1. m.r:,�_ �:1. N �� - n rr r l�.r� .. .q"i':Lt! �7�a�d�—v-✓:40 4. ■ �� :iC•vN elT "" my}L�l ' 1 �c ...Ts i toil Oo `:'�it .L tiky1G ; `,•'A `1 3 , V. RA• C , ? , • •j;, �+h` :�' •ab•y�C S i . . ,,,,...........11 ...�� ,,amino id• r -may- ` A 3 N I~It-A T,0�11r•rT L c X N, O A L C.L N T L,A / ` ' •. • . :•// ,..1 •'P —' , .1V1 ... L.......: y' _ - ..11 �'^- L� LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• a o CITY OF-RENTON- -- - - -- ... ,1 2, ...a Planning/Building/Public Works :,) co 4 ,, :10'ffin,tti _ 3 :- 4i. 0 JAN 2 7'0 0 0.44 a .7. 0 0 '5 : 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 to t- ....6:1- ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED al F/43.cra . 01 • • 7 VIII , , ' eiTATE•R 4/ m ikji • . . • REAS0A/ ctiteKis: ..._. . 811990-03804)2 instrz• .`.c1-/ tv'e,' !-, ., •)!ciew,„, •'',Otten - "' •.,!. BARBARA J.I-IPSNBEN 1114 tree/ - 833 SW SUNSETSLV H-38 tkoct stl,..:.j.‘ a- •-7br ---, • De '''C-Itli' - -----s. r- "° relTiail-7:5 StZte---- 1 R ET UR N ,:::----11;:-.---, _. . 11,ENTON WA 9%527.296 TO WRITER V-:.' - NV1' It' %- -.4;- - -s....,„._ :1 'te';:lin ------ ADDRESSEE IL-- j?-7), frid ....'',44:1 ,uNKNOWN .1 (--\ - ,,,,crzsi-A4-2,,,'2. Hillihildt::::isvilE3 1.:E11:::!:1::H1::1:171111E-11Eliii id E 1-- ----..— ........?:..0, _ • " ,‘CI O C•.) A. NOTICE OF APPLICATION - AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- -- SIGNIFICANCE--MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial!Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M Is likely to be Issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: . December 15,1999 . .. ;I_ , _ I . 1 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: _January 21,2000• ; Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. I Requested Studies: None. I Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. i Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this - ., non-project application.,This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan, .: , designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the .. , -._. _., project description;that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. I • Environmental Documents that ' Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. - . i • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• Development Regulations • • Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,Infrastructure ' . standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish.to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 • IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I , 1 _,r. - 1 1 . l+'-- '�I•da'•°- I et 1-.E t11- • obi; 01. ' d R�: . ._.. NE PICI "1 ' •.T ;;��• 44•,.,7`. �� •. ' ' Merlino SR 900 Property . ;s:9 v \p :A ;lr '' <e�t .'�`;� 1 ,1 `" ° " Comprehensive Plan Map 1 .4 .� ` -'`' Amendment and Rezone ~ .. / 2s'"'Y i> ..a;. . t n ,�_ S • a""'p °. os v?9: 4'. - ;'r�� ;�0• ��'}{ 7�9 .•.4 ti�wlI .I.n i,arj.j.:.I.;. .1. 'I ry� �. .�--r • o_ , �� ., ' m :.I _�.9,�.•�'';.: VP�. 1 C�\o•-1��C�1uyI • It•i ' i S.0 Mld'l •-• -II b a „ail; r = 1 y O1 • .:..1; d_r i▪esi o ' ••, '^• '�.,^_� ._�. -•,.51 • s ..rmo Jr�Nr, b Q ... .:tr ----CO O .b m` '' ,ifs I'■ R�i.1 1 n • '_. `61 tl,Y: • I (I Lk., r 0`JP,io..~•� fib D. •5i,J�1. qP� t � • .�-I- »_1 IACF ��t. �. . II� 41 .. .� �1V9 '"-u•>.•,.. 1 1YJ 1-a"f.•` I p EdR47N `•�, — ... 2m. •-', , K161mill I 21. . ::''' • 1 .I.l•41 ; . ': ;. y �� I I_L I s �� 'J'E•+ w AEI �i/ • D' I • .* '-t 1z po.N LL"'_b!-'6k+ .. •. q'-I-..pr ; •• '1• `. t.:n...`>.:-J. •m,.i. .•9 • ,IF'J, VD. 4 • .. r I04,, ' I.......„20,.. 'i_i , 1 •I'dd,t� -4. P^i f•?1 ^.PE� �ow.f:SID.7; . b ;.Aj'/I tl , . -. , � 6,..• .`.,:/41-tic•• r `• :;::•moo C.. ''.. '-DeF,..4'r ' IL+ ii �'s'¢•' C T AST ¢Nn �i`" ,,r ▪ i .tlQq PM.r°I %%w i % FA• -�I I-" ..I (Proposed• b• ° •.O•1As.1�D•( •• ..•D�. i.e.A, '•. • �• .�Q• . „ 1 . 1 s : I s CA aasnl th«....1 .r. •:Ail ,:! os� +o. .j •.n ?' • col. 1 6 i T 1• 1 .O2 -• •. ,' - 1,,.•-.• .• •! !OM,'.. m.' n' p• if 1J C'.o t l''n e�7 N arm ¢ ` �` 1d..ru^w I • ,.: 'f pq,0 a.b.,:3•• i-i. :I. .eft.":"...,.:./_Q. /65/Q if 1cry i .. , . ✓'% ' •MCJE.1•U.p) CO. ��s ''+ /. e L` @ �: �' :, p; -T Ctr .. • I rI CO •�; �+JLy o..Q-` -gr.,:.:. '• ''�A Jr' , I ?-�IYrr AO a 1d A s H 14.41t:eti, IT C C M M. CAL �iC C M T C,M _-_ ! f room I' ,,. - ` .... :11w'•i�V1!s '� _ , ... . 1 �I % 1 . ._� ,p«n ' a•_.sr -+.._._.---. ---. — —_._...r_.. . • • • • LUA-99.178 ENV.NOTICE • c: p CITY OF RENTON _ Planning/Building/Public Works , ,0� 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 o J�� 7 TT 0 x .�3 U ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED [it .- t 43OI s 'ti .. - ( a q� , y�, ' R. cone C a ;,,clr. HECif tc•- , `\rV0 Suc1, �`•'Wdr ;s 811990-0310-07 Aosucf, `' et � Such '- : LOIS JEAN ROBERTS 0 not remarrinnrsev8333 SW SUNSET 8V APT F31 ne ope RENTON WA 98055-2288 a—a RETURN ��.�_.__._� r�"u��-'$'ram TO WRIT • t ( WI' �� Q _ — -- 1ADDRESSEE- W -„ _ i ;i ; _ = = f ,UNKNOWN I L� � 3`.�j#,i+',r_.y-. .�_ -1 a'1 2:. rli 7� II -- + Irtm + . 1$1''1V � NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED .DETERMINATION,OF-, NON_. SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infll policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice'that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determinationof Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M).:A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. • PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: .January21,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. I • Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to'the - - project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density • residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. -- . Environmental Documents that • Evaluate the Proposed Project: . Environmental.Checklist dated August 25,1997. • LUA-99.178 ENV.NOTICE : - Development Regulations • . Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I 'OM 1 .: V NE q Cr"` ' "I:�'. :,''. 2. Merlino SR 900 Property '4,,..l• P �,T,f;}��;2PA:(24';to �„h;1 U ` ° Comprehensive Plan Map ; -..:-: �° ;�•yy ��. r• ' ! _0 , -,- I�� Amendment and Rezone a% - ...:.,--, Ao i■w5 .� _I o:- — 5,i,•i•';;y O.zoi � i ,d Y,l ,° cr•;0,"14%, 4' • .`�/f •• . •irSi , r wren ,r 4 •--'4'• i>i"0 •m 1 I '.lmLq I I 1 I { •. b ° N. a: ii —=� — --ey — — — :.�.. . .`.p r•o •I; 1.1.1j.1 k I' I I I d,rb rl,.1_ 1 I i,In RE. a i q.1. ••.t.,1_ •I. iS „�'I�1• 9 .�• i I I r .tr..- S, ra lap, :•I ':i C�. •2■ 4 •�»_� pCP ��... • 1�I. .I .1- , •o 1'•! rvc ''` • a'w , p �� •�pj$ t n.�r.�� I ° Erts+4tiu8z I T1 N 1 IF 2 m bi I .16'V td R a,�' , .a -" 1rmr'•.A ,-• ''-'• ..■......__!a + i .A i ;;. I , :,Z•1C11r „ tur a &A--1,. i't• _0. I? / 4 Y• I •..• • • 1 .. e,. y,,4�,1aal b 8,13,t'1 '. , .. • 4 o.�;k_ 'r' �� at• rr�.'�'�•.•; °,at • . ,1 . ;t.J �'R M-`T $F..rr''' I. ••r` Y .,.4i Ln r`� —+lvor ODr' • I'D ,}i'...:-.:::.:;,;;.•_.• '9�qci• 111• ` • .... .• ••i. •l 5Q'.. •� 1 •i,�• •4r•q `�•'�,o � -.�` .a-l:•I! •1 ("-' •`. 3:bi �fi, . 1 i 1 I ' I •1. 41•t• ; ._; to •I. , 4 7 -�:. ;:7.a +' ..tea), z —: o rF) .e.�. 4 • Aq • • ,,.p1aV E .T]1T t, ■,n•• ., p ,'• "• •,• p r S�1V` �� (proposed) • ''.ei ' 4;47/ .,.. 4. ..k„4„.„,k.a �'' �o `' :;':. .p' T 3 r+�irk-I 1, : i ri 1. 1 .1 I ; i ...._%.,:.-_ii.,!: 7 -' r 0 '' �1 � / ' r ��ç;41� •fifr • •it• • > >^ ••'E>/:n bZ=' r.:7, v':•Oo'¢i: j� �• '"'>-.7..f• 6. " . - iv". , • I E....„4/44-,A ,c'it,j, J T } • nN'w i , ,� h4 RC k ft \� �/ .••'' * NI• L1 �4q�:' I11• CO •� ,•••rt Vp- 7•, i. �� II [yam `a•- r ..,:.r•• r.°••neu ..�... rA • ��f��•r�...•� .r• �. ., �..1 1 I S ` y' �a11,1\'-�, •R' �'ti �li ''sC • s, ,,. i,I ::•� . -. ... _,.n0 'yy,i '*�� A■H I~It.A T,O'{II IT E C N N :C A L V C E N T E,N _ •', ' .... spe10. 10 . :. ' •-•NL.A.:.:1/4 I M =1 .1:17r-..; • ' • •••-'; -1.W".-ID ;51. t•.i . :a . h: • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE • ....._: *. ix o 0 ,NJ' JMi 2?V 0 '. ref.ise a - ... 0 - 0 co 1,-- - @cm ta , REASO;\: (1F.gig' .11 -f\.... — t;"4•:1111121" la POST *1 liocia;rneg • TO 1-,:;..t-. - ' . 31:1401 .,AIREPIDERi, Atteropied Not Known '. ----LL - ___ Insufficient 6,d;-••:--rs! No No St::' :•:: Jr Dc viol t-,2-mai, in this envelope . , ____________ - • _______ ________________ __________ ii • ., i: ii i; 1 : 1 % iiii • I • V10.4 • iiiifiIiiiindliffiiiiilliNiiiiiiiiiiiilliqd 1-'7'1'2' Ililidtelullienithilittedill I ':"."" --,.. ."'n""‘""7... ."0e. . . , w 44. ---'.. -::-------- ---7----------- 0 p CITY OF RENTON ..,..i zi • 4 ' \ *1 au. Planning/Building/Public Works 0 r , _ _ . x at, REA1 0 ! '0 .:116s2 - 0 3 0 5 * 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 to 1-- 1.,S all 271 u„!,im og FA Plk-WP 0 /-1)7Pt sr ',..1, .l,.:- '' ' 55401 '6'.6. POSTAGE * .ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED- ,. Attempted Not Known Insufficient Ad:-.:—sc o E.c. : , _"'" 1.0:.7.1ft:,-:.::.:i-;:Vil . riol r,:•ma!' n this envelo-73€ -• ._..... ., 811990,-.0440-00 ......_ , MICHAEMtDEGROSS 833 SW SUNSET BLV 1-44 — -- RENTON WA 98055-2296 ... 1-ctf_i_ ...— .. IRETURN <--::::,--,::: i • i _ _NIVf IV; '44*, , . . TO WRTE ' 9 1 ( — •„:;\,,. _•.,,,, i 1.,....,, op .F.,c.i I ADDRESSEE ---] " ' L _!/ . '----........._.,..,'' _. 1_ , • I•-,.,,,,,-..p•,_-..._r•::_:_= _":".; . ---4-i-r--- • i 1 ----°--7-' '"---' 1 - 1 i______I i___- •, • nv#7:97,f 3-.-fPx;Trii- I,•••, /.. !IPpi j. e,Z. ir,--1i 6 ::' Ic•-r=.MS- NEIGHBORHOOD 89CON. --13-2VA''', ,2i.1 '2..ki'1,-- -:1.-.w.--,cg 0 Q 'd.'6! 1±4.1h i. ,•.•,-](sS.TT, ,. , ---. ,,-n Hi, .,---..". .., a '';''''. . w• • — . I'"'" . 1 . '' ' ; - ..414i'144:::67. '''''''' '• 's ;2"9TH .-sr. ' Merlino SR 900 Property I a, c„..„.1 , .. ,..s, DETAIL MAP , " • . - -, ,a.mgm,i _ .-,1.,.... ,. .--!.eir,,,,..--. ,„,.-...-„-. • - 1 . • ; ..::: (.7.. .,• ,•. „..2 q'.. .::._..1 7.717,141..t.'11..--i...".:1,,1.D N 1---:4TE.'''9 • Age-ilir` !.•,::: sit,,,,A.----'; 1„° '.1,-..-ir?-9.- 4 0 ..'.1 .1 pil11:1E:;1.4:11 -,-:1" ti.„.;:', c29/1H . - .... ki •1.--'- ' 0 • ..,L., 0 ls .,... . , .wb-- 't,..141 l'is.---11F31 1 ; 11.1111a, I - . Comprehensive Plan Map 1,... . ..,-... — ..,_,0,,....• ,t, , 0 rp.;,.a,- to:1m, '-- z..,_ :3111 -,----,..., -C.'... 131 .....,::.... ---, -----1 tI 5 130TH 1 •- "22 • -% '., in ;.,±,. ' 1 1- 1 111 '' Amendment and Rezone ___,„ ,\,• •,,,,„,-0,,,,,,5„..,.„,,;(,.,,,,,:i r, ,,, , ,,,. , 6 kit a v ,.... tk. .1,, ,.,Qj , 6--,,-!,70 , .-4:::;11,''-q .,t- --, ..DP ifi..0 V_I \ ••• • g' s 4 LANGSTON "•ig;I EMIR•,'„• I • - - - ' \ .. , • li). a ' = ., 13-......; "'"' ‘t-- --19------, . ...• ,-_-_---= ' 11,i_.3. 33.3,,c-.) 3J; r, :. 1q1j,,5.7.s.1. .1 . H.fi T" ' 'Ill .,.•'••• •,*'.‘'• -,..Q.../.4. *•• • t'. .. •.-,•.-.0:.;±: .-- g ''''''S , • h J "- . •„ \'"• ,.,,,.4, 5 . ,,, r2 ,F. 59 'it:F760 •2 1 1• be ,.._1. t..; : ' • . 1 r"'14 • - ; 1 % C3 • ',. M ,16e4 A i , ;17 . 1B I 1 ' ,..;,...--1,.„ 19<tr.' S;.. ;.,' -, ,„. 1I .,,--. ,.. ,; - :,•. 001,1 tl- !,.-. ; rt•.0 s. ,. TRAcis Fci-i,i,,, ,_ ,437 I 0-, 1L•1.' 1;,,.2/5 . — .-01. •-• T ::,-..,,,-,, c!i 1 sr-.,1 I 0 -,. 1w 1 • 4 ,ra. Ei. 1,-\1s-... I =•••••\:e2s'. .ENTON. 2000004 D ' 1..,111 1 0 01 i0,0p171711§...:_.7_ ,,,a'' ..„j L'"'1_•..,„,r::4,,,i.:' Izt•t.... ---1,- •iii,o,„;,L., 1 ' 1 I _I,I_ , ' '''l . 1 . ,• ,,. .,.. •..,... -s.._ .. ... t.inr, , .0,- ,,,, . , ,.4,.. , Y` S .132ND Sr at sl " , '' • s- rpli, 1- ••., •,, ,,.4-c>,.. ' '4 , . •,-1- 1- 1 -it-P" .. . ,. „ 1 It- °;, Ir/''4'; • - _ ..0 22 4 J 1'1. 4' 11'• I • ,••, 1 ' 's.... 1. -•<,`.1, 1 • '" --1'."7.- 1 i , , el, (.„,:t„_.3.3,. . gi:c1:13,,,, 3 1 2 '6,0!r 5.1•4 4,,,,,,2 i , . -•-,1..-•: '',.,, i 10 1 1 5340 3.cir,.,...„,,,....„ ",q,..\:: 1:1 ---.-1 ,G- 0 • „., , ---,`- '0,.0.:,-• . i i . --- „t,•.....'-n.'0: .I.!:, 1 ,-----,f..7:---,,,----.0„,„..„.....I • • a 8.,,E1a)ift •3 j 3 J3_ . .„,0 3 ''''.0,,''3 1 1 I 1 4 0 I 1 ' 2 QS "01. ---,-__.--0,---_ ' • 11 25 I ' • •--- _4 1-- t---- - -9. .,„,_,,,,,. ..,,,. , ,., , , •,,,,. [Li p,. ] f? -c„..,,, .---1--------:_-----.---:_,--;:-,-,,..... . 1 a -0 / .1 ,,,,.,' 12! ..,_I 1 a, ._ 0 t -6. :1-28—., a ILE.''',1 •*..a' •,-I ,,,..c,3 b•-.q'..-, 3 r.,11. )1±) -4,--7_, i° 'Lb".:-. I .il 1..21fr:171."3 ,,i -.- •`-- --1?-'1B..- . '-- , ,3• sw lefcros;°' :1/21.:- .'PS. (CdUl' ' ..... VI'' `'''..----1 I AC-1±1 Oh' ' 31L 4-''' --IM 4 14i ,•Ei.. 4.-`4'7'.--t-F--ik.4",-,---;, ,, '= 1 i ; '11 I,---•i ' 9 ':":' .1 : .71 nty) :',,11,, :P;T'13‘?1,, 1.4,. •:i . • , ' 1i,...,, .,,FO A ,,,,f-rte;•: //, ,.--ic_."--,z,...,.___•__t3' 'l, piQ 1 . .r.0,I 1 1 '' '•• , '; i :••=.- ' '- 4 C.-;_.-1 63 .,,rip Dm i•1 , 4,,,,,,, ''. ' ' '" • n 44 astii.•,37- gr, 0,!. i s• .,.1,_,...,., I . i Et ..-,. ...,1,.... ,..,.,. ' ,...11-1111-."---.• 9.,.__. -, * ,,,,„, . ,i. ..-: 51 I- ''I' i'±-'4•,,•;- ..• s , .. . . •••.4.. •-•..„ . .,n& o:.ff IR-q„, -„:5 In . .,...0. 1..z.j 16"..!! , , 5 6,,Jsr,,,, .`C,)t1 .. D-,,,, ,, ...p„I-4 --' 't-, 74.4 l'Ittli -‘-','-4.--;;;;,;----.,--.,,,.._; -T 1.g:,,ax hi.,:...,-,' ..... .. .., .. .•:--,-- *Iy ''':71.:TI:, o„R . -'1F1,a =I --. t! I': ;,r-'• ' •M 1 3. _, i L I.,•• • ,i.' .f svf) ts ,, 4E.i,1"g7,.r,,9, ,,,..' "le.-n s f(2.3.' 5..,...„ -----. -.---....._ .4,;2.7. . . 1 ..! . a ,,, ,..•,,.. .. -.,. ).- p .4 ..•, , '74!-a./P 71,,4747 4, ! ,0 y, ,P4.-4„,,, ----_,-,..: 5] .. -\, ,;...,,... ,t3.... 4 E±r,.._ti , •- • 1111444. 1 I -1' ! , 1 .. r. ,, ,..,..,,z, _. 1' .I,_ . . .c.. „ :0;7...-'// k?,i^'3-, "t... -.‘,6., -za;AD-..--='•"4- ,,..- -- -4- " \ ' ,T2: 8-3"- . r - ,,, .!., r - . --z-,4%, ,0...,, °/".,/, f ' 4 .-: - , ,,t,.,, ., .."- ,,,,- ---R-. -,-,-_,__.... -.-_-__ •_ -_-_-••••,._ - i,; • 1 1 1 R-24 : --..-!•:, - - ' ,- .......,I. . „ . , . ,,..-, 0 . , • , ,. ,,,Q hi, r),, -...._ .c;. ..1. . _ _ ... 2-.1ik CD+ (COLIIIVO '' '' .-':'•-tliS-*1-7_7.. -Itirdge211 9 ., ,. MARTIN LUT,, '''. ! '.e' Z 3 Ch-S•. 7' ' . '' R ' ..,A' 'I,, . •,TPC3,. fa...-1._ ,., .. .,-,--•..:`,-‘1 OA.W.! Gill.)111 . .....7.- ,. 1 i ..:. ;,,:,II 0 .!-Ii,polialso,,. ..., , ‘,.,w, , . L. • Vit., =: 0, 4;i:: wt1.4 ' a,. .;-,...___ L-a ,,„ :.,-.1',;Pw, P-7;',-",----,,_,4,,,,,,,,,•-s,. , i ,r, 4, i ,i 4• ''' •P.'.11.,:. •'1=1 1 2----- -* zAz„ ,..,; - • ....CI 13-at'7---''4' • • 't,)'..s--,1.4.41,53.„4„1,„..'- `4..*,'4-4: ;-. -1 ,'.,til-E,...m,,,F4407.1i-,......---E_41:-,:x.,:=A;i..-_,,„,,,,. ,,,i..,,1 12 Acres 4. , ...c..+. Ate .1 2,s i.,_.;.1"'s s 7.1 a . ... --. 0 •••,. -0 . , ,,w _.,,, t.. . ,j, ,, 4-4,-' .°P;ff.i'R,.;:::-.... ' 4,i E"„;;`,1i':;11/7-Pe'-'1 '.,I X3' '-C3 c411,:i.)%,',./.,!,Agri, . _ .,,,,,•- IR"'1,.•.,, • 1''. .- ,L. , -!;:,•-•,;(7,03.Fre.§.0.0it ..c .i.•.., -„Ie.-- ,, .. . 1, , • 4,,' '''• . -, .,, . -7:, ci ,,,',.„ I ,\ ..I (Proposed) ' .,'.0.D,%if, - 4• " ''' -, ''";-,:.-,-;--, *- . .,..}:',, e^ '-e-4,:',t-'---.----____:__— ,,, "A`6gc___0 •••%S.,%•••%ve,,fte,- .----ir-'?e--e: .... , .4.1. I A,„,, s __ .. ... I 1 1 i cA t,alsting Browne) e ',If!'',V ' '13`'IZ 3°;';'• CA -''1' ° ' .'' 'I•'' I ''''-'- . ----' ' ' I 'V ..,,L 'T'i 4.--.2 1 .' -- ---1 •A' '\ ' \ ._......- .7_::: 8 I 7 6 ; 5 4 3 2 1 rososigaggigpinNE1//ammormwerg/Z4e,". a s s 0:' 4: /49' ‘'..- '‘.. 8 ,'- . i - • d 1------.. •---...._;__ -,..., ,,,,p\r--..---• N.:---- . 0'.‘ :.,,,i5:i."- ., • N.,•-•, or ,-T. -'_,1,-;,27, a-;--_.:,,._,-, .• -..--• -yi,3„---,44,;,-7--__-•,- Z.'',- 11.1 i 1 114 5 agorilir.A.r24 0,- .0,-,- ,lei -7'`°0 ''‘ • •-- 0 „(2 =114, ,; , ....G02--.'0-.6,, ".' .„.,,.,,, t a,I,, ,,,, •-Z 10 Til - • .31,;,'"-.-1e)., ,.C7.•iii•-..4y.1* . johnom CO(!...A1A:inn) i b•„itio,11.- '4- ., 7/.7,.:,„„.:;iz. .;:o4;07_,.//ii,,-7,7.7 ,rt„G7 M(.' 8...:o -.: ,irS(.5‘ ,it •:(2 1:, . '''''' ;.‘ ,A00.011.1,....0441Al ______.: '7-1'7"..:'--__ - -_••1_---..,,, 4,,,,,,„ 40- ‘7,,',..1/f,,/,://,/..;-..-h,,I"3!"--;(t.-A'.'1 41.0-.:4 .,7.•,/,-..t, • S..' ' A - 4 • -''::‘-•,\ ' .11' 0 ' tfi.. ,"..•:. .%, `\4' . ,_,:,,- CO'\ 11.'"447.1).- .kfq",,•--•.,,a,,, ,,,',''ki," •/-4.1 1 i ? f.,,',;4•,-, 1,, /7-,1-4, ,r,y'"Iv,,_6,I1, et>-.< ,4" .. ,= - ., • . 414.1 .41C7'/,, Prezone) -r RCI(Eidsting) ..k.,,,,,,, • ' I I . •, ., ark , /..., ',• ,,• '1,..-.46,,,-,-4'.7.:,....7.• 7,;,,,,'T 4 - •• • .,.,\,', ' \ 1_,_,,, ----,,,,,,,, 04 Z at. - A:- • . 1 , .A.'. r: ;./-isiabf , „frc`iP'1 `•:47.'„4-41 -( ,P7--...41r,„. _- " ' ',:°1-.°',:d Air • ,i-...\"4:. ,„&. , .! ,- i ''4 abrAillir :fr.- „ : • i:e.' ...'4,.,?k'li 15_,..,4;-,-_, ;'''-f--,,,,Tli..' r-\ - - , .:_'--- N''', ..,,‘,._c•'71, ot3 ' %.* it9,•( :13.'8.8iiir1-::f7-_'''..,i/.1')/i6.1.,:•`-`-; (0 e'''''-;,"•T".,' ..,4 ..----\ 4.?-‘:';\TO.de. ! 19', 1' FtC .• , „,,. ..e. \,i • . . e,-...,...... .:,-4,1-,;•;.-4.••,...,...7.-.--,d,. ,„,, 1 .......„. gkell ''''''''F''',4`;-' -,$,PVIL,PIP-ifitly'"......"r1-•--- - '„`'-‘'.. %.,:::,..,,,71r.fr.111;,‘:\•\,,,,\\. . '\'-'' lIPP4'4,. • ' :41iltait.r.,,';, 1-',,,4:157- 04 C,c'7::-,_„ ,,,Hs eip.I' ;... . , ,,, 1 25B \50.° /4/\\7‘,(1.71.\\ 1 '"-.----'k '' •'' -.7"r- 1'1.1't` CO ,..- • i' ..m,. c ''''"Ma',, ot.' ..-4 'Io,iQ,`--,.../..,„,,,....... °,11,,,,,,,:7,., 414 4g, `,'e' \,‘-,.. 1 CO ••••a, • ad. :'7,,,,• '''. ' .4...:4--7'..4V•1". ', ,,-(t, 0.• A„N.i-7' omit-Whin s'4V-----s'"' ----'---- Ft -- • . i- ..),_• -.... ‘ ,.,„.... 1,i ,.., ,.... . ,,,,,„,.... .. ..• , ,,,,Lia, -,--,.-_,,......viesim,, . 5's .?",,,,.,,".„. . s,k--:-.:... ' '''k 1 -.HI I,1 .--. .. „.,. . - „ • ,,,,,i,"„, ,,,--• ‘.1. ,,f,t,..oia•--- .-. - - PLariL • 1 / i . . . ...1-- _ ____ .;,101-141111' "HO N,,,,,‘ .!'"•1 iligo're7,6;diso • \„IL,, 'Al\ I M,15r-'. ''' 1, I rH/' l,.. ? - '‘‘ .,.. i ii • .. , 001 I i r r . '. ,:,:,2., ,: r ,?,, -1• .::.:,4:7., . /.:- .-2.. • pg,....,e-Y!'''':.:,-;:;'-:..IL---.m..,441 'KWIC ,,---1....-.. _.-d'g..._-(.% _ _ aw. •77 •—SF-- ::'1,. — .. i I II 0 \_ - I ____I I L.._. . L" 7,4t.d6 tl, r . ." .4 f I 0., _5„ ,- ,__,,,.-... .,,,,, .-.,-.• 7.--- il o :I. 1E4- ,, . . . • i '-01.0" .'1'EV.7'.• •0 - NEIGHBORHOOD d .• .1 '4'' k:'-i"..,,,v%s 17t‘41.11."-'7 LPH 1:LI D.?"17;T:] f''';'''d• 'W.--4 ,fiEl grr11,711[11 d,_,."481, il.'0,6. • PT 1 st 18414 A•1 SO I gr‘D•1 :71c1D-r.I, S. I29TH Q.'"''ST t -;•sr, ', . Merlin° SR Property900-. ,., ,,,, :r.r,„‘., i Lip.A,,,,,t=a: ,L..,,,,, 01/.°,, I ',11 •-• I SP WINOS .: 'I ' ' ;/' T ' '. ' . i S. '' lifireAtilin - E =.''1 -' " ".' " 1 P.----••• —43-PLPTi-4,-1" ',41../.4-.L'II"'-'1"II-r-i "'"CD "' 1 a ot. wivL5,I; 1,,i-- .,,„ .,(3,0 DETAIL MAP r.To, . ,..2.-7, , ,. os r,„ . ..,4..,497,_• .14, I. S.r-- I IL, t I:II 'N. ',',..Li]: 4-.1,IL.Eg ..,. . f t• . 1 • Adze 1..;• .. -.1 •z- , ,,,;.' ,.,..-,v7.-...,,•••-•,:,. da:r• 1 ;,,.:,, , I..- , ; , ,-.,_ It 1,.,..1 1...__;,1__,,,,_ ..S.Las • 0 ,. ,,lApi.. :6 s,s 1292!-.c,,, zs.....0 i,-',Iis,_„__i .„6.1,,,' . k.._;,;06 i"is,. ix.. 7.- 1 ,I,,- : 6 MI, • 1,, `;',:, .' ,.,.EI ,, ' ,.. F.T1-, 3 Ci cia II ,,,.„ . I: ,,,,,'“ .,41-,,,.._, ;1. j,..„,,,: ; ' , ,, -37.,:. D 's Comprehensive Plan Map ! ,,,,, -•:!: . 200 .111... 400 1..1' - 1°,.'1-,°„ , 1, ,„ .1' °.°A . ip, ,V•;,^.1 -1-' e. ,„ ;5.r51,5i:„/ ., I ' ' 4no .1., ,.,.„...1.,... , :5_, ,L..," ..k_ ___ir,,,,_, .......tu........_ .:::______.,__,.,L.,_ ._. .. •. . ,. irr„. L, .941,1 ui I SCALE IN FEET 12 7" , 12/13/99 130T;' - . ST ' '• tti 3'il•.1•13z.' '''"L Amendment and Rezone .„ °!‘3,!': ,°.r,/,`.„Zu c.4 144.6 ..,,,.. , .. V:: '42' c'igSC430;,v ,,, LIEPC:21 F'.!,,-6,,,, .., „, ..I,•;-‘-,1 6 .„kb ..?.Z'Ol. 5.? Er - I 1 . 0 4 o - .. -, '...- -,,,, s _,of,Th-t---,64,-1--1------___,___,,„ .." ';):7 t. . --. . tii, \ ,, ,[1M.: l',1 \--1 .,,......,..6 v...:2,7: Pr:pared by RALINE;LAW OFFICES P.S. -fl.‘ ''''''''L ' R / < 6:2:) .‘" .. 7S ' 4) 7-, E,17.11,1_,_,.i:TN-. tN.µ, 2N.D ' : 4 \ z s I E-;,Ell micg il`'4 1, cl'i 'i' i r ±. .5-4-°:--',..t 7- m , , _ „____, - r= •,i, : j .., ..„..... , - 7'''T 5 4 " 3\,...0-4.2*1-14 R',..Z 4 3/,:," 2 1 .E.iL '6 'CI -3 ; ": ' • .6 .; 4 311 . a 1.• •,,..,,,.,..,.Illt ' ", 1-..;.,kir f„ I.:, -'1--...7-,.'• !,41 -1.i.i'_::•_,.3,:i oft::: 1, 1 ! , .,.., ..._. • ....% .G4_7 - I -`'. . \ 0 . ,',4,--47„, Cu. rt,I 0! s. 1 RI .01 i IT; R 1 L. " r - 15 -• ',- 16 N4 i' _I _— -----,,-- 18 0 - ,—rr-i---- ,•,:s', • l' \\:::: .\\F,.es n 4 19 . ,, k di,. 1 D• SS e..1..-.-...--.••-•-...,,,,,,,, to- 58n.,60/3/1--q. •I/ 62 i ! , • p,....2..4 • ifi ,,,,,, 0, IS 4ii,.,_,L1,--,-„-,'T ,/ '.. i 92! t 1 . e,' . :0' --", --- z % '1 -----.4 °11 -- 1 CI II '"t MAE ...' A., ,TIG.,,, l'‹ . 5:----1---- ,..1,.., /7„16" 10' ‘-'--', .4• d'0 fJ • / I °,.'1. '..°11 ,...;,. - NTON ORPORAT ' ,\S""•\ ::,- ' „" S'e, , 1, .e, ,,. . .,, ;',' 'Or MD___. ,...,,. _ - ..,E,-7. S. I- '''. -";' LI132ND ST . sr.'• t . t ‘,. ''',. - .'" S t/32 ND ST - .. -N.--1;.. ",•c Fs' , - • ',I,'''±-, . • , • , -i. i " Li P 5:.-,/°4..,,:.141 s\g.. .-..• \\I - 4.,, 1‘‘`Z>A I rk, di 0 0 - . ,i' '.00 ',...: ',...,,,, ,• 1:1 . ,,,,,,,...k.•,. ‘. ' \ 1\., ett,. \ 10 0 digk ,..-...., • ..- ') 1 065 Ac A %, Ff-- 4 .,•.--.s„, '118 n-,-e" I".'• 7-",6; 5 . .11..33, 2 1 22 ..:' ,-.''II, I _ '",:',, '3 `.-.:-' 1,-, .,-, ,•:-."' "3 . L-4 L'. • b 1 ' --- CZ j A .., 7':. 4--../4 6 5 4 3 2 I Co < ,•', , -3,... i 5 4 1. 3 L'El, i *.5 ,, ‘4,. 2 I s6, 5 f":,.., 4\ 7/'..,,, .' 7 W -4'717' seas 2, • .. . • G,,,s, - 4 .- 5_,,,,„. .,0,,,,, _,,..,•„\ ..,,s ..17.„, \ ID 30 '‘,!'1' ! : ,„A, - 3 ""°'0451`; -•°k't Z11`.,i"':;4; ;;,I.. , OZELS s - i .1 1 ;. s'!1 1T----_ S?••=------3-...,,' - - v „,,,-, „._, -------;,_.;?A----- _-_-__-,,,.........:...... Lsi ,,-11.C.1 4.. 3 2 , 1 ,..Ti . :•'6,74r;; ip • 117 p . - v 2 --'5.---- 6 E)P E i ` "e> lir 1 JUR%alri ER lk.•4 n-z.. 'I: 7. 5 ,,.. .. A I . 62 I Cy:•-3., -1 0 i " f__41- -----z.,-.-,-:--___ - . 213 - ;2, ' 3 _ __as\'‘'.......‘_,,_ f• A., A '.' E A Y- :A T.. ,p0,111 413.; )2. t a •vE. \'' • !, '',,s• \ tv ,,,, Ilk -..,:t!,,,`P*.. 1 REN ciL . 1P-' ' .eill2V-4''"---?,E I 1 ' 2 3 4 5 0 !I 7 ?iii•-g!",.'--7-0 r 'sr: i!..-2-1z.k:V- ,gf .,: -----.Z-/7'y:-. ...*----.....7-,.......- . '... ....El- , !.ILI . ,t- 'd . ..."-''' - -• -=',.:. - I a' e_.;411.- ' • '7---4' \ 14 S.W. t I 2 55 Ac. . ,. . • L PATRICELLI q a -.3._ --,.: .t.---.4 :.,' ,E3; , . ,,, -q.4.,-,-97T,e4------,.,-,-.:„._—..-__ • tri i ‘,3- • i , \ , ••• .....,. \ 13 R o„, " , 'CM •-• T. Ai, ;25, i',!Ln'3; [!1 ' 5.Li '.1.; 415•''',7' '''' 1; '.IF,-.• i'c,,A ,'''-''.--'.4:21-;;` 12 ---. ' 44' "' ! • ---- I 5 AL\'• t ., • ;.1 . ttr. .. , 4; < 5 8,1 A- j.,S, Il w.. Am • , -a! e -,--a.,_51 , 3 .• A ,T•' ". •fi/ 7-07-i-------z11--'---------,--.._ ri @ A,,,i, 'Al! 1 A , 1 • ' \ " \ iff.14 1., "' ' sci . :.-7,7.7--M RS /35TH sr - ',',.;' ,1 ,......._. . ---------z.--.---zz---,-_---.__ . w..w 8„,...I .,,, , r,-- . f . ._,-= \, ,I N, . .. 0 . . .',••., cd ,rz 4:9 „ ''' - ‘- • 1 ,-., . .... a , ,„ gj i C,' VC RE/yr° . ------------_-,-:----,..--- '' „- ! i--- .q. .1. MERL G Ell',SURES ,....„ . ",,,,,, -_• f• - i,„?: a „NEE (1") :•., ,. ,,-, 1 -...,,i',..,•-r •.• .. s "' --, ...: 9 9i „13 .7.r '''''''."err PL' ' \-o. '‘,„. 1,r? : ,..-_-.•-P . t. • to . ,,,,,.. -5,,,„zre ,..).At. ..414,1„, i...t.T. ? ,-,-.., • ., L,„„T ..,,,,, ----- ,-,f---__:,...,_, _ rbi , .,, .-%':: 7...--6,-„,_, ,_3_,,-,-,-,,-- ,,.,,,.;,. \ 2ND '.444.., • ,..Ct) .Pw, ,,,•wwv," 44C.L ., & 1 ::11 n 4,E.p,4!*4;,. ii■, " ,a,- . .un'', ,;',, Sr ' •Tp_A ! 11, A Y '4 ";-'1;4 o or sc :ts,„.s., -2.f::22.'s. c sil—. s o .• ';' ,„.._,.. 2 ZI fi , #i ' 111411,..p c,, 1:1 '-'' .-•. ,, , -... .7, .., . &-?--,-.7---=-7----,-.---,_ • .M.,,, cir',EP ',,,,,-0,0,- El•• ' \\,,., :;'):':'::',' , 1, ,. ilw ,1:1,:'4'_:,f I o 1 lis: • C. " --!'84°D1-- • '' '',.7.'"Sp - 404, • -. °A-ii-,.-i-,----------.1-z-2.,---.-.4.,... -‘,., , ,,i„ . , .„.;. 0 ii i , \ N -,„,,, ,,e, ..ko Rtr, ,• htilt, - ...,„ co-.v,„.2"--,, "11. 1„4,_!...),, ize c.i.-3---,-_-_-_,-_-......- -RI, 1,1.0 1/1'", \''',A”,,, ,., ,,,,,,,, • ,•., .! ;'; 'S p Ili 41,' ---- • I IAEA .., 3,2- 4 - --:i e:) 11 ,. , ,,,T, ,t 7 i,,,--.. --elan.. `,Y 1- •t- g '''''.- •.---4-ggy - ---. .• - - n 1.-',„1 -"(7400sitsfis/571:,-- -:::;A,=-- -2-,-----•:-_--- ---14' ii 2 51. is\ \ •'• z5), ,t _ amain sT , 4 - -, • .4.,.,--t.,I., : , S.: * ...,, sr, . .141,...,„,,„„,,,,„ i„,a,,o, • ' ',1"' z N S-------.--------_.---------:--.--s.-St 81,4" •' 4'1 • ', •10 :•.? est 4 6.1.2 , -z/6.,,,..-6---- ‘--c•.... .,, ' -. fill.‘a SD , 0 37A MI - 3 ;,I9"11,1,1":';;": z-9:3 4711217,":".0. .,,• RI _.'107,44'41211%11' z'llialtiliiii; '8, 4 - %Z.,VP-- •-i'4j:4 te- . ,.-..4.,Iii. 1 emelmoit,. - ----,,2...,.., '°`. RE AL ESTATE EQUI T IES CORP. 7?_____, .-/•'' ,..Ii / „,, 4 r, : .., • , MARTIN e.. i '1 ,/11;g8,. ! - "IV i.!' ff. risallila ---'2 WA' '-''—' ,,, I„ii,f,T4''", •..... our/PP ti . curH4-0 ItZ1 itti4/ eilifio .3, ' " -, ..4 • • , Go 113 , 1 . 0 G "' 1 r..9,, 7-.1 r--v c-w:_, 4tii le' 1 ,034'RIM 411"1111111111bitra,„„,_ .,,,),,iii,....__io.' t .t. ..v. ii • 114U•; 44 - •.•al 'AM ' i ' '1 %) ,i,pxxos-Te 1,/ 11 ft ! ','•i 1 II alira...4-12/0 Altrit 'i 1 -,' 41, 4-rilk> q"Ei'l","" .'19'7--z---.•• .2'•.' VIZ JAI` ,-,/v6.9roN litin7,,,,' f.::-1'kglitlit '''''.` 1 1,. g..i'.‘.,j;7?1, ,L,;-CB .'''''.. •7 1 I I rr''' -. 7 J.:t.44 1 ifi ty i,Z1 4 11117 //b....ti I Ile 0) S a- Park ., .,., E:3 • ' ' -fa .'.g p 4131;q3-. ,g.,.., ..,4,.4:1 . ..;" ; :....kroc.2., t .n" if,...4 '. 0.,)7,4,.,,R, ...,..., 0 lit" . .., ..,:ri 4 e „ .i.2.7: .. ,„,:: ..,.Tithi-1-1-,-.1)._ .,' ,: • "'MI • • .&Z Ailt.T. •-: ,. „ , )."f1 ' ,' tillt. c.,5 q 4., ,e. + 1., "p.:. 0 ' 2S „.... Ps 22 p , ' 64 .Ilil',..--\.„.:\ -i'r lir tHR,Ftis_iirl P.211)1-' m ' .4140, 1 ittf ' S//‘ 4 0,7 r ''.. IC' a L /;(21 izeF91111/1114„ ..-.------ is $fa a .. ,....,_ :‘,.,„„;-,7,•••, . . .. 840 ,..• or I ,, P. • SA • CA sting Prezbne) . . AP • ..\s'CA.,:041, ke••'" .' „j-..".4 Al.....- 74 / /73;0.4'2/.1a1 ./ ,-.4 -_-:.----•-•:::-T-, ,,u --__40 'la V44,•&'L",a. .".re 61Pfillr.. ,, FA Ire211P 7 -- * ',# '. '5. "00 4 0 RD. 4, •,,94.%'••• ...-• -- --- 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I e VW,. i‘ .Tss;.4. ,. z; I .,. .22 „...; .11IPX"....; ..•-. . 0 ' 5. /••TH Nor T 0" " a ;.).* If 4.4 .1?'14; PZ- : / ••t4 1-; -// / - e -0-----: ' ' •11. war -2,1?. ' 000..., r. .,-,..rr.. „....- ,j,•. o•ssnasse 4,...rliii CORPORATE LIMIT ' 4400410irjrs. N. . k . hilifii . .,. fir '4 4 sPe ./.4' 4','",iiiy 7 --iji'il- 311! :,---4 .--, ''!:•::-,,;.:..::-,,-. 10 Y--, ,.‘11-''',,t-....-04,;'" i _,....- CO(Existing) 4. ' %, .471//If * , L: • 3R0 ..:.. 41,•;...-II .-_,;[2:25..i.:1 • el• r. • N , 9 -1/47 I pia 0 t:<, %.'-if _103,,i4::D,..,,,, . ›, , i./0 ' 1 ' ----_----- - ...._. ----------Aik_----- 40,,,,,. , 'z',,,, li sz •4 1 I- , S f 1'tf::-1-• -- co,'. 4/c),. (E sting ,. 1 4 ,,,......././. _.,,,.__r ,:r-P •NE've,R,, „ZIA/A, 6-4,''z.,.,.f.,..Q...4kr, 4, „ffir fro .• I/ufg h 4* " je...:124'l 2 ..215 2 I Id Iff4tVe--, h1124,.....i 1 1 r 1-'1!P ' \JO. .. 1.'ts, j•If 412,.''s\ ‘... • \ \ \ ':•••''' '• /0 I Pr.--zone) 5 . ,... RcAExisting, ,' '11 • • "17 4" . Di..' .14: r-....--44/Ir -_-.776/1 Al,' ..(>-•••' .4 pc,' ,P.- :1\r'•': 's\ '' \.:\..-- '\ ..„..., .......- • \ \ `'•4' 4 , la,,, r n,. .,-..,......, ,........4i,. v , 1 t } s o 9 \ ' "' s<frt. Pi-- .• -'4. I o'y ifiekVar,: ..7, - E-r , ,,---v„ , . 1 1)..,._0 i Q473•ft ...„ I , „tcf •,A, AI Y. 4.''' 1 . S.W. ' .11fil' •,,Te‘!.'". • • .., ' I .1\''bO'CO9' , 't, --. •"- 15 I . ! ------'''' \ \ so2Ac SUNPO •..- E . vir;#7 zwlop, ..- A 4(1'VS il;;;/. GYAM4RZMU.g.' .\I:7 • r NI\. 13 \\.; ,,,,--A " — • , r IP r,• ,1....7,! 7lr'' ---,-'4, .,,,,A7r._f. i A ts,'- r"..2•AWl A,ss'*•\.111``, 1 8 A\i'‘s \ •. ' _ ,,...,d- ' ,,, - z•-" ‘:,e17. __,;,—,--,,-,;__....9-1-- =,___ " A .•' ..1.-c's s 10 ••=.4. . \ • . ": ' 14 15. :::-JriVii-- -1. '' -I Air- mi ..., • \Gov't Lot3 No , 1. 7.--• ...„_2...if& .11..2 ,..,--....w4.-,,..4--- -4,..2..,1„--,._ .TH„. ,. al. 4.‘,2 \ . 4 ..\:,,,,\ •,. 001 5. ' •..-, , .-, '21.26 Acres IP ,.., , .„ iv it '- ii. . 4, IQ/...s'„ 4?cii -,6,- ....or:•,_?44, ,.4„./4,,-. „,.,..'. i +P1/10:1;-• E SEARS 6 ROEBUCK I.CO , . ' ''..E.''.,\S.\ , r•„p ', \\\ ,•'''Y;l'-, i,' ''''--- / IRC . e ..,_-_:17.7 \,,,...-\ - -11 , 411 !i:Itr-1 ,',--I kit.", ,s-'••.-t..-•-•-1..P 1.'1 ,4=•= ••'-- ;I'filk-A,,,-,,-, Ark; 4.. .. \ ‘,‘,An \s„.. l',, 4016„s, \ \ 28B , i -',9.-- ),--,,fr"' ' •,‘ 20 „ '- 4 t',. ,.----gerie"-- .•,' . 44,fli•• IP ' , ... .19' I 21 ` ,„ -,. / -.,,,,,,.0.7....— ..4,,,- ,.• -,,,,,, la ,v,„„,,,,,,,,,,41-3141rt.s.:71,',4/..,e14,1?'- s itar'-slj:N..„:2Pl,C.0-/..4:',°°;.”6,---.. '-'-';''14.1i-TrI-",i-ii,-1 <,..,C41-42cS-v,---;4et—rji. ,L°,-,, m Gov' ot ,.:- v•:. ,...1),,,,„.., s-,_ ,,, ,7._-_,..-.R+c, ...-.... .----6-- I i •, A s > < 4.,-- , , b v/ ••• .,1\ ,..z. . - 8.A 5!AA •-i• ..'4''C'.'...--'''-.- R ' 401 p) - , - 1 1 5Ac. ,s/9 40. •/‘,5. ‘ s ‘, ., 1‘'''' „-- rz Ss Sil. •V..4\ t's ......--IETENTION RAM PARCEL --- .. - - - 4111111614114.4.1.0.0.......Z.-., cb .1-. e r• le.. -;,*Allr 4,,,' 474. ...0.„....-,-„..--"",.- ROD S. ,. VIII I, . •-, . ‘. ' 114 tilt;40111"1.111E' - •PARCEL -•— - -3,j..,;,,: 7----I I `WI _,... 4. Are o) — 7s111111111.---iiirti"..7.1411,,,, ,sup, namor-116911*21 1"":ce''55-"''''---- .' ,SS,- ;.., ;i'k,i\s. ix-- . . .,, • • • ,, OM , '30.10,, ... ,s5;;"/.. -4-IFM >. . . •-'s il s - '. • , . i AS HI NNG T ICO, 1 IT E C-H N ' C A I-! C E N T E,R ,,...--.---' .000r I • I V• • •-'--i-al' --- MONSTER - '•'.9.- --On ,,..0 \ . CENTER ..• ii ‘!'..1 1 l -, ..TRACT SS. • • I . • .----"--.---11 --•••••,\ ;.30 • I I` ' i GE A soRNEL A .. eu.,,-,_mENTO 884- CA ... s. , I. ' ''''' '' ' 4101t14111112114MIIM 0., (21 Vs, ii i TRACT .A. , • "'-\, II, "•LA • I M , ,_.. -. 7 i_, _. 1.;:i I 14.1 ' . .. -,...... • 3 il I AM 3 2 Fr:./ r • ROBERT I. EDWARDS PJGEI INC 2,...,28E1 ArAilA / , _ ‘I. / / -‘1, \)'‘\ .' 1 6 I El?, t • , , ;''3/,'• -- -s OBE T 1,11,C2,.. • _. 4 A • 2. .,-„, • - i ri _ ',.; P15.:., >r K le Of: j_ ArAI ,. 5 ' • • • + � + 411,NTO� NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) J2EVISED;, .;;EXTENSIONOF:C.OMMENT;,DEADLINE DATE: January 26r2000 February2,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,.the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project._Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of•Renton•is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for'the project and the proposed DNS-M are:integrated into a single comment period...There-will be no comment,period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated:(DNS,M).•A 14-day'appeal'period;will follow the issuance of the DNS-M._ •- • PERMITAPPLICATION„DATE: December 15,1999 - • • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: ._ J ",'OOo^�etiniary.2,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None.,._ Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC,HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: - Analytical process .. Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted andapplicable development regulations,or in :their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include -a statement of the preliminary-determination of aproject's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, ,infrastructure,and,character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall • include a'determination of the project's consistency;with the•-ioning;comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use:.:;:' `: '' No specific development projects will be-processed-or:reviewed as part of this `• non-project application: This application is,to revise the'Comprehensive,Plan : designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning;refer to the - project description;'that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density�.. residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), • • that Is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that ug ,1 Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated A.,�a t2 9O97 January 31,_2000. -Development Regulations ' LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE . Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental . regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development . regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure ' standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other , applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00, . PM on Febfuary 8,-2000 February;16,,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will, automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • CONTACT PERSON: • ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • , OcNi s .—.„ 11.8i" ..e 4,b ,,dS .4., 1 :q1 ;R ...... NE ,• P RlAL 8;.. .d. Merlino SR 900 Property ' 'a: 9.- f" ` Comprehensive �,j n �� s 7. �, - P ensive Plan Map © :•ti�. ' �, �...-, i; ► t tom' h -� U �i-- fl'- 'a 1 °I S ;4.4 Amendment and Rezone ;,.. :; °i - �.--- • N70�.0 !too �© � � � h I • V" •!' , ! •^C�' •�?'"f ,irv.. :.' I .,• i I 'tbYL 1 f1:. f. •=r: ,a • • i b .se` -'•,.: • ' -' ro •�6.,',, iR -�•_Ih.4 _.A a_..�''13-=1»s't�:`• w •, • ZN ""9 wI+ND Jr 11.• Xis • -- I - `NN •• t+',-o. I'.Ir i .II I•-ti ..� rA. t '� •..� 1_ a . 1'+ r�- 11 I 1.1. •a�•?;q\7 ••.•ry-•\.:.I l w-�S�, 1`m t 1.11..1. . e1 0 .-:c trip I .liN, OPE 4 _ 2s---`a p ( �/. I tl 1 1 h 10 I 1+•:�, 4•ri 'as 1 1 i .,IAC ..�741�`��..... .�.i I Wi� :'mil "�Y� ...... tp 0� ?d � •ee . pt�_a.�-,^ l ..� I 16 01 1 p%1. .�,y 1V�v j2'"•:•r::- i'?4'i4'° , ' t•..VI'. I : EAR1,.._______..,_PLAT �, -,. � rl m' 6,.r-14,.l ib `i cl,cd m iv.�1'I ^yam1 ;i ''m' :,.. ct ' i ik ' . �� `%�t •'• p'b.5):, , 8• 81.9 iig.:67 is :"a •r r'.;i �./i ?e3 �p 1-1... •°'o e. .:t. E`er ,,, +"• rF Q;.. k1�,,� ,• �.;.ry...n,�;.. a' •I. tr...../ �� e . '�.• • .1•1••I.-%•1•;.;b� ,IL De I•• +MDD W O:; 77''7--TY •.•`m •24 - �,,1+` ' , is , , .1.i4.47.1 . :y tiff:• ;,':: :Pr. l ',, 3z'qil,,,.,,,,,-sl'1�1i: TIC ri tw, ? P-- ,v. • ;.g.,:o d ..p• 'I. �•- .ace 4 EAl"PCr•+e ,E-"T•AT �' IN• '•'l.. •i.r,= -rii:4 •t:V• .1:. 'o �G•1oi.D.-J. - ��.�\ "--I-L - "_I-� • - -I (Proposed) ....el, sJ13 • !��'46j•mw.0 •y . D� . s /,,." . •.','• •�',rfi :r(•::',,I.',.liti. 71 • i ''.■ s co(E.x9n,t � �..?•. . ,• + b'„'�+..r [..?,oti.: ,{ ••70 N •• �. b; j . 0001. U I'!j grip , ) ' i•'j%�pcgamin) C O. �� °,1S•t •ie• 4.F�/..+ ' 1"'.. s D,o ch !. •N �.. s .. ' ,n.o a. 'alitl�{p�'�) Aril 0 OoZr''o�.:•�uW F,•n 11 y,1'/!:, 0. I -. f'-'{I'I Ar "p.._. . SUNSET. jlc t•- 1 • ..s� 1 ��_ {' f' ! • •1 Olt •• I. N/ a h�Sys%�� + .'.1 .,. .,t to 4 i I ,.. -- � ;,j•r',?'.'' �•', `�b�:� n. • / '� 2.i tt •�" •�-• III 1 CO- •`• /!"� °yO-O :•>�:, • .- - ot...., LI ,*filisto,mli1/4„, . „..,..,,.....-.. , : _��, ,AM " A 9 H 1 11.0Ta0'(,1,'IT E C H N C'A LI j'C E N T E,N �..,a", ', : •` LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE :: p CITY OF RENTON GATT2j Planning/Building/Public Works co 77 y �� r""' o se i�v�• * 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 to FEB 0 3°0 0 ��: w ® � 0 5 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED �'"� 71 8401 I9.S. POSTAGE . c f" [� 811990-0090-03 ALAN=J.KYCEK --1431-1 124TH AVE NE 113 '=KIRKLAND WA 98034-1459 fr------.----,...,___ N01 DELIVERABLE dS ADDRESSED +16Uu,....-4N 3' a' - - - Ut�At�LETOfOl1'tfARD -' �. jj jj )) ii jj ii jj ii yy {{ jj I JJii a r ii111111.11i,1{ 11i111I1131111111'111111Ii1 ' — . Ht;uR� to SENDER .,,N,,� ��. �� '� '3�C -II,11�1�.�l�fi�°�11;L°I�1�„I1�1 Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental . regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other • applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on Febrr ua -8,-2000 February i6,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: • ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION sE E 41, 41 o.yM�l'1�.1` . mr? g'1° d tr . ....pi ?v1 I e�. f Merlino SR 900 Property i ,s "6: .-mil, E-b ...," . • Ri Comprehensive Plan Map n _ ;[,. '["C]C1�1R .. 7s' ^ - i..... :''"a _Fiia-a. - I°S l ?,, f ;r gil- a , ° :,; ; a-_1,� Amendment and Rezone ;�: _ ,rolire •,. -.-.n-. '.....ro. .% o R• • + 1Nf�JJ 5 i-1.Imo' l y . :u'`s P .a®. •0 ' _�� ') 11• a:, s _ 4.. 21,, �1� ..____"'•;c "-„,_"r ''.L`„:M •. m1 Ea' E L•' a'N7-6,- • ...„---. • q' >4.,10 .I �7 .I`O �� -"`.�• ' �s• 1 f_ 4`61il„�C 1 I.f . g I ro'••a,- e d >I 'z, • ��' yv�.s , .29-- +•I w , -.. ,.:. 'I 1' J� •....... 0• 6 E . ■'2 O �..—'-C' • .� : 11' �� 'f•5 �..,1U- ....�,i- ' ;• i•qo .•. T� ;•."1"r 1f. EARL DLGT 'ic, `A `>StiL W 1- 113 � Ig•LtLL-I_4 1 0.. J I�t�' te •�r. -.a •['m•om.----v•• .' 0 1 1 I • •.• • i. L. 1� + �,�� e. .ice �F'tL`'W a ' pIS�^'�� a o`S�"��+b,;�:� `�n, N. ' f�J.'o ...To..,...,:-",....+�. � L_. °_ a•. �•. i •• ..4i.;• .1. r Aie"V r 1.I>1 S^+:A ,R L H�D,Q�s�..eApo-W O.. >Oea .=.4'�'.. ::---`.�' 1•r m • '., , _. I • ` •, 1 1 ,', •, 'l ei,1 .cg --.,. T-i.,•ten,. Iplra1' -,` , :-•.. —.s.?`;i4 t:40 •1 "I (Proposed) y`T.b /�.•• e, •7:: -••• :s co. `,+,. T!/:i . 1 I , 1 I . i 1 17 , I CA..hIIngP..."•1 •• • :• 1,♦•-. l.f:'• 11,••• ',^ )40 •' •`'•`4. r ,�.-:3L• '. L' 1,i 4a ' „. 1 ..11 7,/b(' ,' .,.:1' ','li, I i I,H I ' `..- COIE.hNpl • •. a."'77 1 5._S.'Q• ..• !�&N'_'...9�'•.'0.. •0.• . j I I ,Old ��.� _ _ •d'd -:, :a I g fir.P '°:01'g .13 ri �`,,, ft/stinn, 1 ' J �p0 ', as , ' CO �`.. -.• ` W°o -..:i V • . ' /=r I b �0��/. 4%f''. W/I.•-"a • ' V it i y :- s a., R.,..q W1p CI 0 0 00''e:r.r: ,..,7i.r • sw rzi.t El, /S��-, N..�,��:, 1 i...,. 1 ,. _. • Wll•1] O� ``' 11{'.�: i.•� f:�(,.`!1•��' \ 61 ////,(/' V i\a. '•Cd.\. ,004111.00;101111111111!,,, ..2:::::,.; ', CO 1 ; , if ...'4.--- , / 0.., .2:..\,./...,.„.....-..... .:_R .(p)._ , •..,,,,,,.: . ,„„ . co ...,...., - ....,,, :-..,_,..,-,-,_ •:,4,..;;.-/--1.:,,,,, . , op -�� • �V ASH I/t.0 TaC f+, ,T E C H N C'A L,+C E N T E,11 y,�e'. ,. / II. ',.i , 1 M ;_I. :-.. 1 1k LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE • • 01�Y 0 r , .74= • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) i2Vi$Er.)07-;;EXTENSIO,NROF PQMMENT;..DEADLINE DATE: Janua^,'�February:2,'2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R • APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: • SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW • OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M):•As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are un likely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton•is using the Optional.DNS(M)process to give notice thate DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods forthe project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period..There will be no comment,period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS=M):,A"1'4-,day'appeal'period will follow the issuance'of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: ; • 'December 15,1999 . NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: danuacy 2� '�000 Feliruary.2,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None,_ Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: • Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process ... Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in -their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include 'a statement of the-preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and,character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination'of the projects consistency with the-zohing,'comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use:,:;; • _ ; No specifc_development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this • _ • non-project application: This application is to revise the•Comprehensive Plan , `' '"' designations and zoning from a mix of designations'and zoning,refer to the ' project description,that permit a variety of'commercial,office and low.density .- residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that Is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. ':Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August-25,1987 January 31,2000. Development Regulations • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE d p CITY OF RENTON �� - <� Planning/Building/Public Works ;L; �'t. 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 40 ►- s dA tit.7'0 0 ' • ° W N� 31 ..AN a ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 1�3 .;&• i,Pr, ,c P'!' 4 � 58401 12P:'. "P`OSTAGE • 811990-0090_03 q-I - (7 8 1ALANK YCK KIRKLA24TH AV E W NE 113NDA •98034 1459 AOfp 98034 flll��l��l�l1,�ill�lillllluilli1,:fll�l�llll�l,t1,111�111f„! • 004 mita • NOTICE;OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED-DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE . ._..,_ .....• .. SIGNIFICANCE: MITIGATED`(DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. . PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: _January 21,2000 • Permits/Review Requested: - Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be'processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations'and-zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density • residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. • I I IA 00.A7R FNV-Nr1TICF S Development Regulations • • Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I Zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations Including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically • become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I • • boa 'OM i s �m(, pyO . o•Fy•,r: '�.-.. ..,� t.i dzr,I3- i t ;..•..( ..:,fib-0_481 d,o:n`, . NE ti° ",_1 ' �';�:: M Merlino SR 900 Property ,ti; • .0. ' [1 ;',' . ii l.31' `'.i g`" ° . Comprehensive Plan Map 1 I op :%�S �C1'��'7', •7p'i., `'-;,.' is \a•c c ..�... a ! ' Amendment and Rezone ..-'. ,w, :!ts a t. 'p 0- :a"i hp l 41plo o k0.' ^1 a _..... D I. 1:6 �4 I u .5 . 4 . ri i i• �,}•t'''lal', •by i �. �•1faJ �: • c"aCI vs. t .,v4/, - -.I. .y Ij K ti_\ 14,d_I_1t1 4 0.•a •'•1 •• _��'/ � �--:.�:=i •-- `. __ r :fir ,` s WINO Sr • '- -- • • fif-,_._. s .01all LON° 1.. . .k, • { I I • • i R It I 4 1 1 a -- 5'::�r.-n I '.;R u lT mi ,�, .t f ��, I q IO 1�i ��',til'IHi,e .i i -1_.I�y_o;0 r '- �. I.y .;iti :.R: .4 .I p ,-r s.... 'a.ro-p;. a s Y�°• D v t , -` iA1 �tr. tTl m os ,d4i 1` '111_,pI X.:..114� i ,1 'A .Tyi.: •r. i I 0 O I 1 7•A • '� ... '' s_uir• arvl 1L.r_•'' • /• I• 1 • • •• • 1 •,L• 9 .J a, et 3m•44' 01� �.b 'Qo r 4 d—e.: - .VI 1I p t ,y/ �. J �:f. r••,t 1.1:..........:... 'A" •I2. t1 `+--��"at."�•e i' r .�; �� a: Ztl� 'aoo'^ �: •o:'; If. 'J}-�.. .. :."•-_.°p' Il-,,' 4 : ��P, ' '1'I i 1i •I Iy !'��a i'j�' „Irrr,�h ^E` � e" '� '�� •+, ,a, . . ...."_ ...,... ,�• � .qlt. ::;• O A ��`t . 1 It .►r•ao .•- N/,n.. .e.�.:.•:r 0', I :a•'r��b'R:,{ .7 Y`9�t., \v • ,.•�i ,�kZee_ �1I?, .. . ..-' (Proposed) ~' , :,- „. .. , ':.::Cm� .. ' ..o� ((((pp � .- ' I • 'v s, ' -" .e.�••�� '••. O :ter:-a �- i i t u wt.g......••1 ...,* :/`of ';' , •I •o J`•pro .. ni 1 ac CO. �> :•al. r ri;l i r :i ! �. z' �.0 11nJ� I'•✓', NFgr „;:e::l i•..y , ar•�r et- a n•f a!'�Q1y, -1. l' ` �'"�, •�NN btl q 1 is' .z. ryY ` (;je• ='.,,k,;. m ki \n i r'r• y`gC0 1 i 1 CO +:: . �f . r t. ti .,,,,' W—,1, IN MO . /, � ••.o• sae+nest !••p i r •` ,00.400 ti_...'"ib yA s` 7-04.44., ti "f A7 N1~It+O T•O‘ I IT'[CNN .•C AL �1G [N TL,11 I!>0 1 ,� WA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• $ © CITY OF RENTON . . ... r< , . �, .LL Planning/Building/Public Works -_ f do } � " FEB 0 3'0 0 yy �e"S * 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 c y d :r_ 0 .3 09 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED -� PBNEr8 71S840R 1 U.S. POSTAGE 811990-0540-09 - DAVID R.ZANATTA KLINE KLINE 3806 13TH AVE W SEATTLE WA 98119-1312 NOT DELIVERABLE a _;_ AS ADDRESSED _ 83� lu UNABLE TO FORWARD '0 IN RETURN TO SENDER ti w jj jj rrs{ tt ! i ]J ` j ii] j jj ii ii j rr jj w '/- {�Gr .vim 11111!'!!1lSIFI!!�l�ti�llli;i�f' liif�l!III}it��1li�f�ltllill{IIF�111.311III�i!!f 7'V'i1II • O1`�Y Obi • • 1$1,• NTo� NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) . 2EV�SEDEXTENSIONOF.COMMENT.:DEADLINE DATE: February 272000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME:. MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block:to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 q 000 Feb _ _ NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Jaaaa Nary 2,2000 ..:. . Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and .. recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may • be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. • • CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: ' No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the • .. , ' project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to.a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), _ •_ • -- •that is focused primarily-towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: ' Environmental Checklist dated August-25, 1897 January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE Used For Project Mit gation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the 4.bove application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic ' Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 . PM on Februa February 16,'2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will , automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. . CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION eE 4. O87. /i; `.'t o 63 - o°°,,r c E,'d?- :T . 0 b 3n�'_6.0 I ,d� �, NE pF _ •, i i 4-q;B1 a- ,,, 0r_' Merlino SR 900 Property .- {, 1', t:I ,4s 4 `. •• Vr'fla " Comprehensive Plan Map ; -,_ ©•� :c., S ^ 'd1- , ° •' p' Amendment and Rezone .. P_°i •t -- md . 9, 41�T1 t5�5.� Y •` i •alp.i��/©:"-'Oo;,F6 , ,+ TRACT4 m+i• o, _ °,S•••1�. ro I O�'bSL a •f.' ®:. °la , / b SA - -�r. 1r_._ ,.. `GIs =eq•:.o of .d• lm� { 1 T �.�--c6 v: ,-Z.t—yr.__"— '___— — .. ._k 't�l';• '•'1. . .I I 1 i22 ,* 6. b �; {,I Q N V\I --.I` r1 N ,"��:;�if S° i 1 ,i` -r-1M._:. ;1�" .'r� 'd ai . ,L-'-`'Y'•'%" 1 r,_1!' `) ' '•. ,•k, • I. ,.R �A qt4I,•tl. I 1 I r I,cti l0 01 6^{ _ t¢I, •;1�i 4� f PI � e ` zf '�. IAA t �. VIA.7. ...;'I., r�'i •I.' ,7.1 ;�ru`o- . .qL` °: , a ■I:a,•Irq, 1G EpAL 0-Cp7-oN -`.. - .Ia I fa y,• i •,, I , 'y `�!`Ic l 2.,m• l'_ 11,, ..L. j�ili. RP`.T.,Ipp G i•ICIrel r�.:•:!___.:� o,, i I ; • • �_�I ,`y n a uiiM er-, ..��,184 '�3"z.�i,• �M ' ••:D f .°gip_.... ,N " a.• � i��'• 1�citi'W a 8.!o,r� r>> p �1�{�..lrH 1�01 a. „, ,u7•''o• mot.:�._.-,''...,__...ro.�'-c.t; ''. t:•`r �` . .I. - i..i. .i.1 r'p:''' .4,,;h±,i•R. M4'Lex1 ,MD O. - , r . .O•-. rO,e�y?`; 7„1,} •�� 4-`ITT r,ci •�1j9� .21 J��, • .....i...g? ,,,,,' •Pq- I • •1 rM d �-l� ♦ 1 •.'��''p� 't' .,•,l ,P(°IJ ',i�;''''gz.:,0:•.,+-,' ':--J'JI?I-'11, 124 • t � /,s I �, _.,_.__ . ' ' ' - d•'/:• �.f�'aI•l± .,ti •n•'7�fL•(z' _•,••� 2•.:,r.L, ,ice I _1 -,--IU -� 1 .1 (Proposed) ' 4,be /. / .;r.am� 1 a o i.o, Jv. .r ' 1 ' •• -•. I . S I . . , , , I CA .htlrp a.w•1 T I a00'%.�-'y—._ ,. ,Y1-.31 .... .. % • ^ ! :Q 47.- J 'RL..0 ,,` ( ...,• n • • I.H I. COIE,hIVI - • • •j'+ ./1J ' M' I� :,a ,�' h� ,r. 1 V ` "'.••Lc P,._ I Fl�:rouo" .P..D�:/O / 'gib eun �• • CA + • . •,� 4 . :> RC iE.iWnyl r� 4 .4 , b1 N ,•4 /G , . ' O H 1 SRC ~�♦ -13HH'Ana � • .;.-0,; 61a+ N,4iJ •,�,y•�am:� -•L_ a �1 - ;� M •A 3111A T.Oi1' IT E C H II C'AL jC EH T E,II _ " e -_ 1_,L,. - `� LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE milRA 41-4'NT0� NOTICEOF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED- DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) • DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existng Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. • PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,•1999 , ._, _ , k . : NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: • _January.21,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Rentcn Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shal include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This,application,is to revise the Comprehensive Plan ' designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,;that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic • uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• • Development Regulations . Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I Zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. • Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • • -r• } r' Tom- y 0 rri , sl. -4 i P b a a5' 6#11 f mo d.._. , j •: :: M Merlino SR 900 Property ;rim' su`�` ,`4';� b' 0. g.• ` ° Comprehensive Plan Map ' .. . ate -y . • � '• •I -U Amendment and Rezone 1 .�.. r, ,,_ �— ro• ,,: • .d,O�//mod. •o •1a...• -i I•1� I ' _ 11 1 1 ! °•42;'jp; q� $9; ,� 11.1 4 '4\rf t 1 phi.: '.,.I I,• I 'J 6°JV�� i v m i 5.1. �. n ¢! • Ts�ts�'o -; p of �1 m '.�• :. I K`oF�11\ 1 4r • Y••i •, + 1< �� ea c rS A�•� s •uiMo sr I L.1 _�: c •oti 4 1 IAA pp 6, Q •-' • ---k 'Id, I I I M RL ° a ill." b '8, 1 7' I � .1 -9e`� 1p I�� •zt •..`�• ipCF l .,..I tl i r I`q to +p a• ?¢ o I '�1;.%f•'r N 14�0 ag o::i..:.. I• .i 1- 1 EpRI :Z Ic rl V m -; l 4*I'1'1 GI cbs.'i w�•..?',I tit 0 �..�. .... '7 i ; i , ' _,. I1 Ir s 1ur� ' � �rr.;� A✓ 47•�•....„„..„..g.r.., 00 4 LA ••, • '9 ilic Ibi 4 L , ,5 1-1 I ' ' I 1.14,17 2 ',.1 ....:.:p c 0-- '�°y`z _go- - 6:%": _ � .• ' •0 9l 0•'0 • .;:. f -4-86 1 I �%R�-' (Proposed /�:v;844; i'am 1 :' o "P''...;• ' .; s , I . I 1 I i 1 , alll•eu"ar•••wl , :4:°t °' t R,•, n ••1. ({ate.,.' ,, ej a t 1 1�11 i I i. ` eotL•mal •• g''• �r.. ,.,• • 9a"9• s. "-oa. _'°.°:O�i�Ql 1 ' �Gy ied.awo i • s j am` . . _` ,,��4ty�.. g':'`b' •`•s:;••:: • •:; • •-a.9 ��F} �r I t RC,yE,N°rol C O. > > "-GY. bs 1 ' - '-Q••..�;.:...; ;f�p • "•Q-' 4r.Cr 9� n �o '" • ' t"•." •c9 T-Lt•/N J7��p w="'l w stT O y'%.. I Quo • 1 .�w�, N ft s./'' ✓ NsFgT,j•�,•sG`'/L-4.' "C-.__._._... _\.. ..al.l"i.\ �w0o(J 4,`..ilir n,i ' ,p f• � • ° y �': v. �,i`` - ,: . it::. sr: in ,o // �. : 1 1. V. -v. 1'• . r . •CO • ^ `- 1 ,7C• ▪ q„O :.7.:''.17 ,.• 1 i1■1011 `'zzi �, Al 1111 `� us•••:aro■ ticwcic.•.+...•• YAII: ` _ "_' `. --0,44�'-� .sue .m l .,i I a.•'ta.•r _ — '� T^r� • A! H 1'IT•A Ti0•.�I'hT C C N.N. ,AI '/ ; 4. • .1/40N1 • ,.,. __ _ • _.. • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE 0 © CITY OF RENTON , _.,r, ,=�=' ,k NAL Planning/Building/Public Works `\ �- tot JAN27'06 i � n30 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 -ram it ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED • 11 $�- 84 f -, 's `4 N'` 5` 1' * 5 40 i f. O • POSTAGE 1019J • 811990-0540-09 • DAVID R.ZANATTA KLINE KLINE 3806 13TH AVE W — - ---- - - ------------- - --- — -- --,I SEATTLE WA 98119-1312 KLIN806 98ii92015 iN 14 O2/O1/OO RETURN TO SENDER _"I NOT DELI YERABLE 0�1Vc C NO FORWARD ORDER ON FILE - Bad £0, E UNABLE TO F'ORWARI.) AS ADDRESSED - __ - „0.a -_ I RETURN TO SENDER UNABLE TO FORWARDC. o- IN yn7 RETURN TO... 1SEtNDER ftij '8ear".!'?.:: .-7:�_a2 11,I„I„Iiii,,,,Ii1„h,I,,,11,1 1,1,1,i1,1}„t,,,,1,1„11„,I,l,1,1„I,1,1I,4 • • 01`SY O� ♦ 4. CM - Nrs0 • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) BEMs. D:,mgxT'ENSIOti OF:COMMENT:,DEADLINE I I DATE: January-262000 February 2,'2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combinaticn of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS=M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Jam 'T 2000 February 2,2000 Permits/Review Requested: 'Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation;City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this • non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), • • that is focused primarily towards'multi=family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25, 1907 January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA-99=178 ENV:NOTICE Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00' i PM on Februaq-8,--2000 February 16,-2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will) I automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 i PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ' i 6 J iA.o,y•!i' :m�i P. ° d ..1+' 1 Cu 1 1 ''i,_• .-w.._..-:�-•--.::- ftEQ a N!0 �u'RE,t6, .. t.d3��1 6441'Z' `C �'�: NE • ' •;+ � iatSli:1S-• ;".. �; Merlino SR 900 Property A ti. I .lp4,4'• �, 0 °� b:..M } Comprehensive Plan Map "•'1i[� i :.J a cSaZj t�5 C )4.4„,$.../ •� , ° 1 '�- Amendment and Rezone °,• . :pl11� --"-'�•�. TP :.;. .1.-4• ., ,• '' •t••• ,..V,e , '.' ti, ' lal ��.�7 . 0 •0ro • I•'• TL u,. •!.; 0:4 : . ,;olb 1 c "•. '•I v 1 - _1 •.t'.I.t i I 10.� -T\ d_I p '� �. !e :.p.P p �_-..— - -- - -�• - !.. -ig 'rmi'�•I 1 , 1 I I o •o.,a .�I I . , I,ra �i -,. �1� i'� i.1.:•:}0 'i`; ;—rzTTn_„...- ;�; [i: ;6 • I, LIB er'`'s,K. 1= \M1 �•:' 1.e . '• t � 4�a'ni: i•�. .��: i •; iolml 6' • - *Fp •2'I .s, �� QPEil Y 2'. — .�`... _ ?`1!•:61:1-0_:;i1;':-.---‘ r, -,�'1V v o•�-.. • • 'ifiJ:•" i.a,.ir�:' IoEp. l.tl•LG,_ ��` rl °{- '''''cL1. 4_�1f�1A * IL , 'I ii-.. •m ,,,;. r ❑p.,' A I ��- l',�‘N.,,'^n y -T��7.81L► Qi o' E•* Np;• o r/•t. ..... ........ p� I• �, t 1; .i 1 <I S. .l,:p" '''.1- n.i pD,p Zx•_„ oo'•;� ~', 'o" v,e y?\ ,l ��.T,a G' I, 24 / • �� •~ .1• .;P_' $' i't TjVei5—` ` D T if-pj• •1 •'0t`,`•I,�6,-• • ` ,'L;Y,..,:... `!--iry4, . y . L f I •I•10' ' b•• , a�� •.i r•I p l'iy?��,�r�,l5�a`i` � )ii T'E q:n.. • • *k'(l '. �57 . •'• V r Gr'•,40�,"?.o.' _�. v_ .1-,-, -e-�'-� _I (Proposed) •'e1, �,y• ,•,a •7: Omy 1/}�[ •, '�• o �f .•••. J 1,g • •• •r _ i: 4. � .n i Ill I // �� co lammrol 47'8•+ ;:'. g-, b o''v. '-°1/ Cd I, ' yr/0' hve.) i' . Hc1E....„, O \ ---- am, a b i.'- '' %. 4 C5+ • • %' .S a 1-—i • .o ej" I TI.� 1 NN,c y�,j` N EgTTA i••esfi 7 • ` ...,A..1W':. q Oyf�� J• \ '. -r r S/' i.e.-:,, ` t: piC mac.,[, qe,_-.q0:_teP:r,r0 yr ,;+9, k 21 \ \ CO7,7* .--7; •.‘a, '\ -... . . ._.• "...ft-, . .. ,� ••. • wool S •'.; 0 elark ~ ...IM op A S N I N0 T�Or�'�T [ C N N C'A LjC E N T E,11 �je • • • '.�R. o A'a�� 1 My' • - � ,� f''• 2 IZI• LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE -"giummumemr-vommin, . . ... . . _ a 0 CITY OF RENTON tax , 14,1m1477 =11111 ---.."j IA Planning/Building/Public Works a co _ U ,..5 0 . pot-4$a — J :1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 FE8 0 3'0 0 601-- Azum ALI co tc cc P13 METER * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED tl.ri.* 7158401 u.s. POSTAGE :298880-0144-02 MICHAEL S...SeOUSOOFIAN ' 13503 80TH4ES SEATTLE WA 98178-5104 -.1iii.'-'---7.,.- ''';: riOT DELIVE_RABLL -4--, - AS ADDRESSED .-----11 833 S ‘'-;\ •-, v...-E; E:,,,,,ti OD , .., UN TIE TO FCRWPC), 1' VI cli 4-' ' - R E.TU RN TO SENDE.11 11 IL"'" -441-5" s?.i-.M.Sitita• 2- 11:1:1111111111illi1Iili1l1:1111 Miliiiillitilmlihilliiiiiiiiiluldilliiil • G1 VY O� • • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) j2EY/I$ED,-:EXTENSI0.NOF.COMMENT.,DEADLINE DATE: February 2,'2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combinaticn of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS(M): A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 • ' NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Jam;24,2000.February 2,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation;City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards-multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the'Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated ^ st 25,1007 January 31,2000. Development Regulations - LUA-99-178 ENV:'NOTICE r • 5, ...: • . • Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development ' • . regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental . regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 1 PM on February-8,-2000 February1i6,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will . automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ec1cor 4�z:0•• -e' yfi i�i a ' ILIT.. 5i,a= ;e..;r „ gr ' Merlino SR 900 Pr 0. Rr, ` ":1�;',,, .164 All Comprehensive Plan Map I -2„= " �‘;, i - •a ° --•A Amendment and Rezone °, -?:°i v ' —'--- tAc4; .o;U©�-,...r �--rS�G''—� rat ,i•I .' • . 1 .'d 6•01/. "oo'.FO.. 'y •W •i. 4 .,.I Q't. .... '..TNAc7sl m ''�toc. .Im �p...t, • ro �'bF�) 1 G.. '�u I 1�a "t• !"44;n '•�.L s. � ,: " PP r ,.: _ '1 _ f �..�.�I I�� ice},d__.IhU :r •' . tea_ '�'/'� ' .. -�.,., ¢� ; �"qrr ._� 'S•/17SN0�.. '8) ibi m� �jl:—� �14 C�_b-' • .of--yam T _ 4... " .;.z3....1 1 ;o •r `s�y-w,! ■R ` .1`-�•y ftV:15 a1'.i • '�•i.`r" Jtc 1...I ra' t ;� '•1-.I'id.. '1 6r f] r!al� •,.gl i.1oli. \is ~'t••,•�, 1., - r�-1 `,'' .t. ,� ' I i• ., j----....__ a Z.I. 'za .. •I 7 '�, .z+<...•1�a.K� I I I Y• d .i `vi8 i. .a I r 1441 49 �w{'PL'g L7 � ¢ 0. '•I'i Q ` QPE . I )ze •••• TON --•I"CF `�-\". Pr I� r j,y 1 `v ,. i•a•'.I�.'r: o E AtyL1 Pl,_._ 61 co ` +rlt 1_ 14.'-_I__L-4,..4.4_�' 6. ai'z .. "� .• �•t..... a ,' '•A -.� s %i` e.• 111'::I. 1149_1! d 'ST.I'.r t�� c'1 CS 4)1?; I4Qr• y r ?. ,5.2.. o•'..-,` _•`.•..1.._..m- . •im Iti„'r 1S •i. ,I, v. oe.;h� , Zx_• eo. +c„a1 i -.T . 24� •. �1 eo- . I ..A. .4 B4�„,.. a s#, 'o.. ... ..,-•.. ,;;•.... aryl /° ...,, ,' 1 i ,` :.:-e$.'. q::.:! " ! °c� .cr,':---- '-'III c f # ,,;'-v ''a' •A aF ? s`• :...: on .cp�„' DC-1 /I ~t. �•. :,mil 0'. r5� ,• :.o l sl � 0 4r_1 n • . ‘1 l-,-I_I__ -� �I (Proposed) • .•.�.e ,. t►',• .i..'.am 1 Ly :, °� .o:.. °Jv; 1 ! . 1 : I CA .Ne.y r.....: 4 '' t' ''' �.�^ 7,,'•1 • ""• ,'t: ' 8. 1,� i / ram' • h. 0 ,,L.,_�.. 4 .F ,•' ,t.:1:.:ri t I e s co(E..Nnp1 =•°:+ I n q,P..n°.ov h'' r ' i ' I ,�'�.� = ------ - \ .. a•D . .'•l - .I 'F; -°—,-•.:O'to, 0 rry rr.F.,�i l%;,>NC.IE.l.tlntl) CO �`• ... �ii,t v ,b•b •'bz .i-.:-'.'i_h"?�. . �•`r. 1. _ I FF •.C.'r:•0.:'P7..4.4.9. • •N " _ •.. ,-r31."' / S.. ao'h`or.:, ,• II ��". 1 .. a Q a f'-i7'i 4Q..�...__p22 yVN,s��iit.r • 419 c 5�, N��- 1 ,.. ii 'r..r lnr OoUU CI li. .—t�.... ,1• �,.g: I._ ' .L t 1 J'a -Y11.b.. .\ `Z9�yi� � �'f`=d.'q_.4�'•,�;h'.�6 ter' ,j'}'_ 20 • ......0"pk ' H \ ,..--- - ,. , - _ A 9 H I 1)40`T,O il' IT E C N N Z C E N T E,11��-y.�a "�✓`•=' LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE { C.)(VY 0 ♦ �n • I‘Nrc0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) B..EVIS•ED EXTENSION OF:COMMENT DEADLINE DATE: Januacy-26,2000 February 2,'2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the,project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period.'There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS=M. , PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: , : December 15,1999 �� 200 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: . Jaaua.^mo0 February 2,.2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental'(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: • Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: _ • No specific development projects'will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application..This application"is to"revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from'a-mix'of designations and zoning,•'refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density • residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August-25,1987 January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE / Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • :fegulations: Future development that may occur in the affected area under its , RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental . regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development i regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. • Proposed Mitigation Measures: None, Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on Felamely-Br-2000 February116,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of . record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. , CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • _,_ ., ' '. C" -- '*-- ' -It?) I 1 i 0 °E� U tii , 4 8i•'.e i 4• ']3TdS1 6'4446 1 ?b. , I ..- NE i 41)WLTI i,av : g,--o= r . ' Merlins) SR 900 Property .°a; `'�, ;:A.'. Q.. 0. ' "' . ,�r••^ , 1.m '°' `-1 Comprehensive Plan Map I o-oao• ��•,' i� t.L�7Jk ° _ �v�. Amendment and Rezone ? '•'•�'°`r� --$ --•-- i I �q "ti . .n (. ' : ` ' TNAcs m' ' tol -m � `r51 f l . . 1 :� ..t. 1.!1R v- � i Kb�' l s ; 'i� !/ .��_ .� • rk � • I o ��dis.,f.a :g • '� .o. r° ' it . s •arMn r 1 :�.--- .. .s • .,35Q ri+o p • -N—VN I/�4„1,� � ca! :•I i•1.-- 'Fu.., s '• ; alto i� ..1 a'. •t. •, .1: l9i. 1,1, 'D �. • .,'4.;.: ; :,- g. "!` ��:: . I 1�.4,tr,P. •.j,14ic2l,,„ ---,-;•,.:_..L 20 D• •i°i,1 I,. t ., i' 7�'�: ,,OPEil 'z"Ep GTO Ic =...r7 i: � ti t1';?: ;fd`W e i k'7,0 t 6 ' Tt�; Sao ,'r ;d• ft. ..t rs.„;_.... ma c. .1, A'._r , Ni ' I, 1 .e.,+JJ 11-. DD" Iti.?;c47.t'-.::-:"-.v� &q, '. -` • a . ,t. ,. V. . ' q ' . ZI k.lp , r1.. N..:, ,•2n r90 ; •i,.l I , , . i'i�j '� . , w.'� •'•' rt -,-, --igp. Zr.-•4��.tL - .�-a�-III--I='/�, Mr ": ' •!. ir`�:: / ,4 (Proposed) o. I ° o�°o, 'deb ‘f•,0.1i., r, •7: Om• • :J• '' v•'I •� '°��(r•. , r , , , I ! , I 1 CA..N'Yq Pn•a+l . /• 1� pf�-°T= •/••1.' .•^..�^ i,g�•••�. f1.AL i liEl I • sue_ com...) . r• • n-,t,s•^.-. , q �.°•o 7l% i. `..CNI , ) NCaE3I,unSt CO.�..•�> .. ;1.F.,..4Z 't•isi .,# ( � ..?:9`It >,r . �' e•. • i t]aa ,4.°... t,.. 7•-• 1!'!,J1.Q° •ia.:l•:,.J lb ,4413 +u4xtEr4/ • • d. .* •k ; fir' . ;.-• = COI ;t �,_ .g'O. •`:;a.�; pait . .." '"......4-4.-,........,,R 14(P)_ . . 1.z- ' . • •. - V jf A S N•I 4.0 T 0•t1i 1IT E C N N C A L,W C E N T E.N mod':• ,' - ir; its,' 1: \1I M ; LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE c: p CITY OF RENTON ? -A:-_ .. � , Planning/Building/Public Works q CO :I' ll -� 0 " FEB 03'00 5 1055 South Grady Way- Renton Washington 98055 to .ray : 0 .3 0 4 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED tt.ra4 PBMEM 7158401 u.s. POSTAGE ,-\\ , \ _, 298880-0 65-06 - BRYCE E.BR CKWAY 2320 HUGHES A`VE SW SEATTLE WA 98Q 16-1836 v..i'-4 0T OFLYl;HA9LE n:' IlrfiL o.'1\;".;?,it_ \ 4., K ADDRESSED ,-,; UI d$EE Ti0 FORWARD 5' WW - - `- - -1-- 1tt 11 1 1 i ) { 1{ f i y t 3 f i 1 t 1.1 1I RETURN �0 SENOEH \ �;1 ,i11s es � .'', . '% llaIla1a;Iailalaal!IIIIailaaIIit ialai:liaitaaiiaatiaiiliia:;latalallalrl.eitasaaf .. ,_ 0 0 CITY OF ItENTON t—6' ' 's:.1r5'.7,Irrcse'774.41 :..7. •-, = *: • • A , - „ea eseXPosesr -.......-......r ..u. Planning/Building/Public Works ro, va -.. < "4 f C.21 ' FEB 03'0 0 ge...43411 — U'l 0 j * 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 co i•-• ' 4....1. ft. AP., ' 11.1•Ca * RELeW CHEM •..‘ - PBP1EiEn fl58401 * u.s. POSTAGE * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED tf.'...mkti-rTed Pft.+7116,E-d; --- F ;1? • itt-'171T,t1F.d r7:7•:,0,k,n Lik. -1:12; — 4-n..F:`1,-,!.e.•-•. A.cf' .,,,, cr••:?,s.s . ,,o ,-ilch• St,'ez t ---- . ?VG Su.r_-. t'll:11=••tsr ___ Er mot rernaii in this envelope 811990-0120-07 .--:- • „RHONDA L.MCLEOD • ' -•-•,--- t:,---r•.-833 SW SUNSET BLV C-12 r-...., . 4. ,."7:-'•! '':7-'',2.... -- RENTON WA 98055-2296 iff1:7 1•' URN ''---.---:-Ll'---- ' o.,.-,.—_--- -;.,. - !ITO WRITER ,••••-r _ ADDRESSEE —t1 14 8.n -,.. t- _ • . :TY' 1_iKNOWN UN• ,.• ___ _ i;•. ..7 rix..,,,,-,•,_-ewm/yollr 11,14,i1,11„„1,1,,I,I,„11,1 Iiliiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiiinlilfliiii1.11,1,,iii .-..44..-.7 ..........' . -----------'''-------.- — . - • (vy 0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) 12EVl$ED,-;EXTENSION'OF.COMM ENT,DEADLINE DATE: Jar ual 2 0 February 2,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance. Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS=M., . - PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 • - NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: JaauaP 1,2000 February2,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may • be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430 • - 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of,development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: . No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan - designations and zoning-from•a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the • project description,that.permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), • that Is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected.public and civic • uses. - • Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August-25, 109W January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE 1- n • Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development . regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental . regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,-2000 Eebruary716,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: • ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION 69cov •R•:'.C .6N1�,1 I ri pa': }}� .d • t .... OH? -••Y ,.I.1 - •1 1-i'Jb. 16• 1_M I d _'• ...... NE . '� •r�i L- :Bk - '� Merlino SR 900 PropertyI o r° R ` `.b 15".� .. P ensive Plan Map n .� ..' :.[� r i f;•� i ..,.--,. _ i....._ 1': ,a all. . 1 S i i d 1- . ° rtiii Amendment and Rezone ;' :112. v :r:, — '1,G; ,pr°.'©11,4'PT1.4`i"" S .I• 1 •i•' '.:,1� R I' .1. '6y7 © i',°O..©:.. I Tsl mMp �r� 'I 7J.� cy ,. .PA�ir • eol m; .pP5.1:.,••'•1e,i lu,,,,,1,� , .,d_ia,a Q=c.;� "�d I. . : 15 I „ • - -'Yr ,4,'� s •wrNa 'ii lh, 'I��K ..—.'�.�.'-`•�- '!_��.1�[ST7 +teNo a -. --r�. /9,.e 9i 8F„ z3,i, I u• J. 'o '� -- R 1 •TI '� 4 '>? . �.„-'•-- o• -- :j"f� fw1.9= Lm�'yi t 1 L' a •..ib �.I,G,�_ , I.. .l. a �I fit• •• . i,. . .. r R: 24`�a- ,, ! 1• ! I III'IA" 16 Vi 6"{w-......: _ •-Id mud •ill j ''j°1'^• NA OPER `1 ., ` ..:..ti• __,- .... �,44fl1ei ,:.5 • ILT9 O, , b1•• ' • •; ,, o ^,7.-..,• •°'�r�yC •I.`r .t •' .1. ,a• .•�.i ro.lA •RL H U, �K- 'MDD" : 'cl y i'.t` ALL?'T,. -24 • .", '''' .14-• • . _la _„ ...,, !.„...7,, il......i.2. 1...,... ....,,,,,..„,.,, . 1 1,.z,.. ...:1Abo. r ..,0....,..,„„ _ :::,..,.:. .:, i _•,....•••P v ‘vv •-( Y ►' ,E TAT T,' ¢,r.. '�o �i,..... . . • .•fo 0.,.. ...,.. 'r•�__ =.� : ilZ...- •o t1 r] T.v°j ..- ` �E C0-• J (Proposed) ':ee • it •i•''o• �o , ' p�,'nf 1 . f I . I , I : ; 1 CA .btYq maawl j ..... v / i• '''/..�I'\.P� .I• •�4� �' !'•' .•le.:- -�..t„,:, ••i 101 ' ro:.�1,t. •. a..!1 •` 7••..,' n: f. i i IH I 'jero _=--5 co lE.Ntlr91 , 6ort.i:_•,Iy. Ul.r ?.,�-`O.'"b•° � ��` / 7'ip' Itiay.a, . RC(E.YOna) r` N.dQ`°•`F-9/.....'6 r i•';•.,,, ;1, , :.o I�;(). II - a .. ' 4 • \ Uan °. ��.:.A i•-l.�i�l!'.Jt..o-SWo�':.J N"' 'Sir ;. 5' I.�.8fl. C(ej sf�,y''''t�. ,5 \ N •: ,�-wj. GII•II \� Q 0= 4 ,.1•.:�, ! V. ,/ 0 A 4,(.. V! ', DIY - . A �' /- .F`' j-�'4-K,rst.;,.;_,f ,+'•t / ,tril., \ 4/..- , .....,....._ ....R elpy , _ ..?: . . ,1 CO '''-'.=-•-:--_-_: ''' ` -?""°' ".." '''';'''''' "efifr n , \ .,..--• . .. ja,, � A S N I Ih1 T:0•r''T E C H N C'A L ,C E N T E N1 ,,,e e , `•�`✓'�.--- :,.:1. 10 f i'.. .• -.1 • • • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE G��Y �� 1 • �'NT� , • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) REUIS.ED.,=EXTENSIONFOF.COMME NT..DEADLINE DATE: danuar26,2000 February 2,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R • APPLICATION NAME: MERLIN()COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of • SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residentialinfill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW ' OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely.10 result from the proposed project.,Therefore,as - i permitted.under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- , M is likely to be issued. Comment periods'forthe project and:the,proposed,DNS-Mare integrated into"a single comment period. There will.be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determinetion.of Non-Significance':" Mitigated(DNS=M)."A-14=day appeal period will follow the.issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: , " " " • December 1"5,1999 - : NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: " ' Janua. 21,20000 February"2,.2000 , ' - - Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. . Other Permits which may be required: None. 1 Requested Studies: None. I Location where application may be reviewed: • Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic ' Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: , Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of alprojecrs consistency with the type of land use,level of development, .Infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall '-include a"determination!of the projects Consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use:; • " - - .'No-specific development projects will be processed•or,reviewed as part of this . . .. ' • . non-project application:_This,epplication is to revise Comprehensive'Plan • - designations and zoning,from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the - - , -":• ' ,project description,that,permit"a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that Is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. . Environmental Documents that _ Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August-25 1997 January"31,;2000: . . .Development Regulations LUA-99-17B ENV.NOTICE Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development . • ' regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its • RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental . regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure . standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. . Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February Februaryrl6,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • • • eJ .,, e !i' ��JJ,,]]C1 to: °m�; p;o d 'h I emu_ }„�_�._- :�— 1:- f'tC4Y 0'2:Q"M�.'^S�'I( i.1t },I-L I i:.A.�... n N% , a,.. .:1 l 4-�b 3iytd`M' I...�.�„�'7, •__. N E R,`6-= U.--. --• °' ' Merlino SR 900 Property I ! ',,'' :oeTi,� ` au b y16 a Comprehensive Plan Map _ :. • o��;', �i l- :61 CIa�c Amendment and Rezone _ .( °i=1,�j 17 '--- _ .1• 1P10T5['m. 'tpV I �1., • ..� I .�. '•.; �} f ,Si,`x•r =pp ,1,• I •t t. .be � f • do JJio ,. l.t Y' Q _ __ _ , :Irk• i �ti o bi e, { . 'T v y v; �l46 . _,. ,.... . 4 psi:,: (,, zs,), I I s • 1 ` a• b • 1 eLMp J t��,-4�_— — __ _— t..uF,.tli PJI'j• I .j o �O 11. � ' ' h� �1?�r�'Cr.,1��_ }° •1,.• �l�.l 'ram'"_:r.-.+� �. t i L'�.,°.r,`4+1��,'d� �� ,I. ••a�`�/�.q�� :t.�r k:= I b �_:.R-f."l�,�,{y f'I.i'�I j4�ti to i.��{wd ::_ d.n+d '2PIp' ii'i,4��` 0RER ■ ze --.'`..TOK,•.,--.,1.. . l ... .I. 1 4• t ra.9 ".`4•L:_ ,. , 10.b. i 1-a+7x I EARL114-6- 1t i. �' t,;• 1� L- b.[d m ive a,�' 1- .. m "_ o. I i i i �- A q.� �•-.. y , mi¢ar� �"�q o: Ear,,,Q P,,:• 4�/•r.q � PI:•�i j I• . .1 �r M.�� ,.-.flit i'b:;4*,ir144,,. � "r.: P �[" "r-- 4.3 ry , ;90: o...-._i,:��.�•..`��•*- T.4• 4el �t•-I '\ e ,. i.;. . .,aQ'1' ''' 14•;•q'- '' *49 'ta,,-,41°0 i 1, 0�.4u7i;"--;`if9}', •: .L?'T 1t; ♦f � •i 1 Cl, �, p � p�fl ' '.o '�i�.',. �,r(gl�l6 •24 'e':f A. • I-I I �? °e., 'r:. r.,1 r •2!- r•yf4. ;until ] '1'`••• . wr • .. x14 , :s•-110.` ':.'9. ?•,'..,, �!p .\;C+-�'y° �-•f' • M.P'ra'v' E T�A�T Nlir. �' „�V, $ •" .N . ,. ,U�p.;••.;,•-.. Prelare 1N.I. ' • �L# �-,II I_I_ M F. (propose ,, '. i Zi q'� II ' 1 1 I 4 I 1 I t , I C111F,I.r,q"mom) 'A:, , ,. /.,•'••�;^,�,Q = .=`• ' T /r-- .a��r,4-:.SL, - Nib• ` n ..�U I7 • , •I• °? .t i Ili I , - `,- co,.hWpl y1,-n4.:+A, t� _ ?O• ,r�-lo -.i T. .. ` / N°IE.hun �'> > P-�/_C bz 1 I t ,a• ° C1 el.ft w ' ,rF I. r N /X I L i'h •- C^t-C• . y 1 -»- - - -,m.I= �ct, . 004,i l �d. i-, , 6C yGr�': s; ,- to 4' t Iy � 1' — - � �. � .:• i� �r l J �}'L . . � Ate'.4A1 , • 4• .1�E ; I l _ _ '�G.•.4r r—��.- W I • A 9 N I It 0 Ti0 r� IT[ C N N C A L1 Z C E N T E,11 d` ''e y; : .... '''.''!`VI IM ; t: •I. P I ±'�; __��. i I - -- •,ate,'' I; _ ' L••- LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE • 0 0 CITY OF ItENTON •"9'*,(1 ...-4172rgn..- 412111.20.1"........2 •1 , - ,1r AT Is trip ...-:: 27,.....7 ------.:=, • mil Planning/Building/Public Works A oi oc --I Irefirj ri .. t, 3, U r, g * 0 a 0041100 — 4 -1 * 1055 South Grady-Way - Renton Washington 98055 co I-- FEU 03'00 U im co * ec * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED t M ' PB METER 6 7 15$401 U.S. POSTAGE REASOA, th, iv CHEcfr ,c1pi..„ nrq `fused ---••• -L,.- : c't k• `'r''Scmoi, le flown Ae- --p, i ;re c.--' •'_-.,- -'ress 44.7.1 '-.1- 811990-0400-08 LEE L WOODSIDE -,... ..2,..-- 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-40 Aff(091, .1.2-.. RENTON WA 98055-2296 ,! _ if_. s3j al, Y - -i-ro wPilTER(r;:--;.' AL/DRESSEE 1 ,-, LAI d _41.7 1UNKNOWN c.„........,..,,,,,,j0 ..,"- , . 1 1 1 i . '1 j 0- i`" St.4_1MrithrPreft:-.4., jiditlitialimildidilllii -II ._. - ---- • 4.1* • 411, • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED__' DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential. Multi-Family Infilk(RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive glen text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination'of(Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). 1 PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. • PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: ' January21,2000. Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. . Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit.a variety of commercial,office and low density = residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic - uses. Environmental Documents that 0 Evaluate the Proposed Project:. Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. 1 IA_17111 470 CM%/ Mf TV`c Development Regulations • Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I Zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations Including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 'PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • -__ _____ __ �cu 1 I . ! _ \. _S_ axon•`�" 1�J"�,igF ; jmi: P'o 1:d ob s:� .'..� ° 'a ' ' L1.` :: M ' ' Merlino SR 900 Property ' ' • . L4'- • 74'.�'A ; •`" 0 • Comprehensive Plan Map I,�,o • "� li �° - Amendment and Rezone .• -'~ � •,i c• ?4, 4L3�, i$�S' .5,T• + 1 ,i.1 1 i�6i';•''i';•i ",� „,� + .. ` `.P#4,b�``�`\ LL T•A•i�sj..o •_ o� m cc J y I Kb 'a: •Y.y I' 1:. 4 , "'!.� __ •- jy • / 47; m Ibk.,. a,t•){ 1 1 s'z ' • r' M RT6' I ;q; , '• ate.• ,��, I ,.I. .I�'41 ,3 . I�f9 o-4•,,,,:. ,• d' I'� 9......................... i E4fy _.�. I"y 1 .K.-1.) �.%m chi Ie4 1a' • T'i 04,I 6��J m... •l• n. :•I i :' •; ' . ;�` j_ Is�_w/-air), -c'il q,:...,,T.:,,,,,:. J 1l.�='• v✓• tS /. DO ' • •I,m� ,]� .tLF••'. ^.11 •,'1 ,t i •.. •2117 O% p ; •+ a -Jt' 'r-•qer 10 •r r•b,7 4}1, ' ••.i. 'sue..-- •• ' I- :—..r,,re--, •-,�• - .... a, • � � -'•i• �p� �'� I_',M1, •I'i�q�• �i.:556. �V• '� .. ••.• rrl , �'4bi rr /.7'0i .....,,.t•• ; 3' �� ?'4...' ` . a '••co • l iF:r� " Y�'� v ;. :M.. ` ..r• y,1. •r4.51.: !}I .`o' aA.1 O:o.; C !SAX_ J.,1 �II _44 -I (Proposed) :ee ,•...if I::° • "d II ,;.o h' '•'...,.':Jv .LILY � •� '/ .• •./.1••'•• • .44.... :l; �'j,,Zi. / I L I I L 1 II J I I ... CA .I.U•V � _ _ .. ,•,1 t. .,.Q;`S �?. 't'•1 9 ,.,..� ' 1 all: I l`1�■ 1 too p . l�� -'"� ••..•.. 4f :..• 7'"r .•I.: Cuo of';•-::1/�D� ea.a :�=JJI CO.` --• 04 �. °S:4, • I... /Ls Ci CTj� I • - RCiEJhU.p) > �` :-EsI. yyLr - �•: @ J, ?:Q7:!m/ate N /: • + `ro•r. h-Lt/P��a�.. scbsscr �,•ys. e. �x,r%4.. - -.--."_.-...- • - �0o A !?,-4- /A/ K :. ;# .jam°l ' • 1\, N et.y. !r 11,V' J s ^,., Ira - tc 1 .. �,PzI y;�•'r7'1 _a;: .•. J.' �. I;.. 11 • . f : CO •'I .S zc .'1r .°•a._ ..:../I:...� Ak ii• \ -• ��, L �.•,\ I,I I CO '�' . .°j•r, L?..J4r••. •. C 1/ +� jam` • -:......r: .s I I • Ili.am..r 'y,i� _' yT*,•�� • A A R hA.A`T.O‘ .'IT L C II/I, CAL V'C L R T L,11 _�l / �.�..._ 'AL..- �`\ 7 .-..4._.-._ .-� •cam+•••• - • _ . u-•n I-n�.�_.F ._. _._..n-•: , LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• a p CITY OF RENTON " ° Planning/Building/Public Works 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 in LW N J99i 2 7'0 ® 5 EC cc ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED T. °' `I'<<� R ` s POSTdG8Ea* i=�40) • 298880-0144-02 MICHAEL S.YOUSOOFIAN 13503 80TH AVE S SEA7TLE WA 98178-5104 vV�Z k.. _ NOT DELIVERABLE e14 so AS ADDRESSED - � : 00 UNABLE TO FORWARD REIJAM TO sEN CS Gi:\\:......44 ,°' - --. , 2 1:v2 11,1„1► 1,1111 :I1f,11,l,11ll,1 I,iI1,=IIIU i1,fllil„Iltnl;lhi1l„111;1i i i 1 6. p CITY OF RENTON L A r ,,v„��=-�--� Planning/Building/Public Works - c A 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 C2 FEB 0 390 0Vin" a ® 5 ,l.lco * . ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 4.UmPB a 1158401 U•S.'POSTAGE / 811990-0280-03 P. CARNAHAN 1700 BELLEVUE AVE APT 505 SEATTLE WA 98122-2079 Pit I UnN �-"'_'..--- a �. 77 t :c TO WRITEP( e3i g L - - - — 1 ADDRESSEE a� = D Wd �� :,!., 1.1f�,i�{�4' 911 i 1 bf t-+:14-,it,,,4:Y 11.- •»,, 11 1 h I li I I 1 11� 1 h � 1! 1 Il � 1 Jl3 ll•I•131 i�;i lh - "' 5�'1 �' r+•-. 3 ! ! t 923 t13 ! !! i. i !. ! 1351 • Ca) O.6% hat NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) BENI$.ED:,,-:EXTENIONI rOF.COMMENT.,DEADLINE DATE: danuacy-261-2040 February 2,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLIN()COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as • permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton:is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the_DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Januar 21 2000 February 2,.2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time,of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall • include a determination of the project's'consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: 1 No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part'of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan • - •` .-designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated ^ugustt 25,19°97 January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE Used For Project Mitigation: ' As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • . regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 rys PM on Februa -8,-2000 February7.16,1000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: • ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION - , , • I , • 10° F " ` � RI;e: •:-. . ' Merlino SR 900 Property . , > i, ; �� a _ � 4 .A '�• t r • • Comprellensive Plan Map ' •It," '� !A p��Fr: 'e , MER r:'� , t'.,. E..._ .: i.::' I t ••a _CSa'Z]: • 1D/. C i. A' - 6 ; p.-.-'d', Amendment and Rezone °, ••�:'1►..; ;.,,,,• •••_,ti,••" !`. :.,',, t,L-• ;PAi,rsim . . id' o' fu •F4��V'1,'. I 1Oo''1.b1'l _ \Ifs` .�-•u';'I'442. .- na • .I/4lbpe `y ID Q• • � NO- � • QI —_ L . •'' `,: ' �9 yf71• •t• ,ti za.;,{. 1 •ca,: �. . O ie /1 �..�� ; ,'y °r •I.•�r-1'I` trit'lrrk - 'I r.' ti •t' • •1124a.`•..„4.'.!..l: '.41r .I,I,f•a `,,I. -.,..• i� f :.R: 4, .. .•.. 1 I I 1 IEi 4 6{a, �.s„�., .. el 1'1 g� pEli ■'ze •• �_'`I— `` .1 1 20 .v loill8'1_.._1:,611mr1apa•I s. i-. wt__ . _ I. 0, 1 r.. • . I . Nii. •1 ,i.Qv`'i'f't td „0. ,gQ�t,ir�.ai°D'a O7- +or°\ a�} "Ll:2.2'ot �, .' ' I-I 1 • •! . .•t�'•• e.• . .�"'i`n•. r• it.pl� • ♦ ,,y}LI ti _ •` jOdyiV '' •`" I I ,'� tr a,- °ems•. ,o. ''o• ''•, t ;r�rO\�J��[`cQo•o': ]� 4•Il.' • E' T A:T r irk.. u •t ' •'.l a~ T./•'Q •[•r'• -....•••0 :_P6•••• •: •'�/ 0•G•, ,Q"••p...-.I�, `�_" -e-,I I--I-,�, • -I (Proposed) :bb +`.:'�[' _41. .'I 04, IT':•O I a.a.'a M`ql•, ii,, Lr I I I 4 I . I 7 ; I CA..bona th..o".I l;JO o ' :" ♦ Q :•' �$:• i 1 'A+" CO .,,:,.:1„.....: .. 4vt - ° f :: �:''qq• qa;`o� • ••'.'y �+,� c , .'� . 'a:�:to / II C7`,0' jam,actEbang) F IS S ` �.- T•-•� � _p.;7 llaa cr z+ �t ...% � :‹fri. 0,01 ,.,w :, .._. -�' J Oble, • I- l'R;;G� ( ..• k, R^ - • RE• �yII" g �5.J 20 .L I K. 1 , .4 •,04,7„ --- -." ...:„..:-.1...„R o' P • �-+� -iq A s II I N 0 T.0 11' IT E C N N CA L:C E N T E,11 '--` • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE • :; p CITY OF RENTON :� T, i << �- - •.A Planning/Building/Public Works ' 0 A REASON CWECKE ' VA"°° 0 0 5 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 Vrtc_laimed ____ •. :v FEB 03'0 0 04.40 inZ Fofpsed t f(— * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Attempted Not KnovWrt': METER * Inwf"icicnt AJ:ir,4 5 ai58401 U.S. POSTAGE A© Such Str-�t 811990-0310-07 LOIS JEAN ROBERTS 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT F31 RENTON WA 98055-2288 i—i . [ uriN -- — — ' I: �` nh 1TO WRITE R,;:r. _ e33 « `;:. (ADDRESSEE w s Wd >r • — --- !UNKNO N i =r i 'gyp -� J—')'1�",.�,>"`fy`^ TiJ: f5rigip` ; litlithllilliiiliilillilllilhl TihIllitiiillIMIiliiiiiitidlilifiiilliiliiil , • • • XVe., O� • l‘ivrc0 • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) REVIS.ED:,=;EXTENSION OF_COMMENT..DEADLINE DATE: Jarwary-26r2000 February 2,'2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a.DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination.of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. • PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Jane^^., '�21,20000 February 2,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. • For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- • 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. • CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the.preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall • include a.determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. 'Land Use:• No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to'revise the Comprehensive,Plan, •: designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer.to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that Is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. • Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August-25,1997 January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE A. Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • . . regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental • regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,-'2000 February.L16,1000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 .PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION rf1�v ¢ I.C .of 1 ! (" P d TM 1 o J� ••• •:i ••1 _ 6 3rtnl_ - ,ri M ..... NE 1:a?- g ,j•-o.- r Merlino SR 900 Property _ .7 o` > � t" =r; , �?• °� ,b '° Comprehensive Plan Map ` _�©• �,,•_�°� '^ - ° i v- Amendment and Rezone `:°. •'•,1.:°l --•-"•" .� :'Cz , toe .. s ...• 4 1 z (s itl. p'i•• • ti� I V.`,: ;,i,I'' ,' t; : K ±°I Elm EU 40- • :4-12l " se It-7 .,..1.4)7"'"-•••• ,...'". •...... ..........k.--- Cai-.°. Olk 2 63."-”P 1 1 ,,' HI • 1,i7fan Rial ,Z, a • .%. .• : 4�mYNN �pEiA F %SU.: ''_t•1 ,r .1b�i 4 ml 6'P w'd :-` d tf' D* 3" J` ! iUV"s ..1C1 �" -� �`• .� ..�, 11 d API ! C I:s .I U`7• _ 6 ...... . •I• i •a;•ril 7-iEA L_ _6=- `-�-y '"' 1,--,i, L �•.J PO }^°N(m'�--- M. _ 0 • 1 1, t p:.. .u.,, Alimi• ♦ ., - ,i IF'1.+J�-9! 8 �_� 'I �E i ,F o t~ •,,• ;�„�•�. +-----. .-c.�C • /� It: a Si,;. . ,tr.l.p.I. .:'�'▪ •,R. ��iY�*-.�UDD"� r . ro;�y ;,1 �Ia'T„ `••r.:.-• iala -I_ •iI4't '' b••' �: -71`�''; •,. iQ �� J�&a I��::�5:.: b.• ('{�.j� • ;L '"" ;,mil _ P,.• +'t •• _ -.Q. •O ,., �,,. o ;;}}}�''•''�ry��.yEoM7 ..° r. ,,:Ld.. •-..r,1• ..q.: fit:."' ,u U/1 UP�ejOa` I•„" I •%,—, -,-e_'I. • -1 (Proposed) �• rpb .•• ZJV •7r•0�• I 's• ., h..o:, J•0.• i,:, r , J . I i : ' 1 CA,.I.OngP a.l _ :(.1 r• Or\"e ,I. .'a•O�^ .2 O "' XI JN co,E.I,INQt '°. 2•i J." (J!/�+ •i••',P-�o�,°'.-.,°V ;r7- 1 � � ncIEal,u.Wt \ 1`. -6'/.�bit• 1 .�y/l -'Q• /417. . „ - %- a ; F v •.e 1-:-4 ypn .l�0 00'IJ'o':•l p.�• /S ' ' 1 - , _ \ QQb 1-^'V' l�l{--- P._.✓:'... JUNJCJ.1r' Q N T.-•._4:., y I • •L.,t,JJ 0 f,��, CI `.^f ', , .\ t�•' ° _.• C a b,. =. \ Z9� I n F.•Y �.r# �Jy6`b•`;. •",1 m J,a .; I �. .l`4 �,t"'r era y in.6;+ e.`` i ,6*"... -Ispo:,,./.. -............---....-...J1 0.(P). ,r: ,., y- Aiq -.- A° N I A 0 T,0•r, IT E C M l( C'A L W;C E N T EA .. ,_-:-• . '•!_�z" y` k1 t Ify Ji :^_ , .. -. _. ,..- %t . _ i a1{ .-_ 1- - i' _ . LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE • . . a © CITY OF RENTON ,4F.-----.=---?_..,, rry.....,--___2_-----. _ A T 7 1 'P•57:,.;:* i.Tr A • , -4, tyliwo ,r. are..110.81119 * sal/ _ Planning/Building/Public Works - 412C AI * '0= ca--1 IkAere A .. 0 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 REASON °Heap P.... 0 M * FEBE8 03'00 ii=f/-4411 - 3 u RI'lerf;;;'°d ---rit_,.., (---.„ ,_', I 7P IBA%7 U.S. P 0 S T A G E *** ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED '.4 — •...32,-,;,teq pi---- iq,-Wt:bc., , 't known ick- 11 *3/4b.c.z-;:;?.,f ,,-•"rr''''t ---__ -•WPFa.etil, t;:6-_-.a., 811990-0440-00 • M8F1.31EC3NHSTIN:Ei:1:-WI-.-'1-;DA9EET SGOR5B°51--vs2s2'-9464 ITO VtiRIT -R(----' _ I .70 ADDRESSEE 5) IN d .;...-',-:-=,*- z,.-.. 1111 1 1-11 1.1 1-1 11 11 11 . 1111 1.1IIIIIii-1.1:0-44. y, ri • Oti`tY n ♦ e ♦ • NOTICE OF APPLICATION • AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) ,REVISED„-;EXTENSIONOF COMMENT;DEADLINE DATE: January-26,-2000 February"2,'2001) LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTIREZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I).• PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as ' permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is,using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods.for,the project and the proposed:DNS-M are integrated into-a single,comment period:There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION PATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January-2 2000 February 2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- • 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.706.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,•and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the Zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land,Use- 1, , • ,specific development:projects_will=be processed or reviewed of this •,-• .-_anon-project-application: This application is to.;revise the Comprehensive,Plan. designations and zoning-from a mix of.designations and zoning,refer to the .. - - project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated ^ugt25,0°97 January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • . . regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. . i I Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. . Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February-> 2000 February.;16,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ' ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION 1C0v a•e. r` I t opal i ,6?- .:i ::P12]3 aT a.yt4 :d �`• . • . NE • F Ii��-. :;BT.� = � ' ' Merlino SR 900 Property ° °a �,ra. ;• ,, tt t l , :„°;: Comprellensive Plan Map 1 -,\I a., ° •r �� Amendment and Rezone ..1:'°i s °;r 41C1 p13.iajq;.7F5T- 5,7 ,eD: •59,k 1 ,,`.I.ti•r'�rt-.i. .i. . ktp ' .ma• t' �4rii�C:,0 c- ,. ...TN�L 4 =Q.oCa _Iv iJ a,••• �J - ..,: ff ` 'ti .. ... m r .,. i f . y I 1,;IlI I 4ror1 : d_I••i'1 :=c::� I':ai+ �y )/•i3O �'� a / .�` • J Neva 1sr . I' - ~--- / �?,•{�-. �-� �1� �VA::}Ei o'--i..r _..�``t , , - 4 m.'ifg• : •'•I•I•L cc .:4I!I,.1: 1pl,l•i,l.r�r �`�1 �I '."k - i., • ' `� •L: ? 1 I.Ill I I m`-•' , •x----...-._ S'. a Grad .I 1;:••••l`A,i R�;,� , �t,,z; •'`'• I 1F f-RI '4,�i�_:: ,'!,I I hc`' io .j., p�raw' �=p a' 1e1,i:OR DQP,E liu,I'ze ,TON.,+ =A-1 '- leap--1-' mB �i._'pv.k. 16.�di.gilq,i •�.lii.g c,l"5: t y ; 1 , I. . , "'�_ ' 1 ,�`' I �11i—L� ..,_mi0.t�arL�� i•..i . "..%:.'• ©rl -°+ p0�yps;A 1 : . , 1 �` • .,, it':Q• laF� 4 8 ::-'4.., ' .--aiiyri40,.l`(4Cor • •, ,r.l o Pir-•„ -1-,..... QsrG 1,I- ' 1%, 1 .Ni.i. .l...d,,, of.:ti ,R i_N4o,t,ikk i:`.Niao'•W ii :0:•• ,v„�4-7:7 11 �''!'.m,;,Li' 'fL 24 ,` ' 1 ` •,•,I ,47 �� e I .- I -:•.•e.OQ• .C4,,,,"`'T.�y• -•..?)e11. _ ,44• h I ,� ' I ,i `i .` ! t 1!.. l'I•f, •V 7 . 0.'.'� �.c�F1j: IJi .r,.,e �•�. . ,nl' 17 d.. ',•.r•,• .c. • pit..'•" 1... 'U/y n c`P.0 • -.I (Proposed) .b •. .C. •i'at' / • oQ r ,, . r , -i y o. 1.., /, ' r. r . r . I r r I LA .Lm,a r...a,.1 ` l•f. o,—. I •�" r; ;•:1•. -.. J i i .. .1 i,H I _�5 • ..IE...wcl , P•`iyy:'. _ q'MN.•aa••., ,i I lam -'" _ _ I'b _• u - ' pye 'e O.'/p / \ . �. ay ,: � .,..,. .Ur�ont�'jU •c:. • .ea.u.a i H CO • 1';3 c V o- , , . F , G r k• a ^is , pan 4: P kr',q.- • ,,,r; '--•--, ii • _-:. ,,,...z.:40,111, ..54eask.siM........... •1:..111 4•ON T(C14.11C•1. 7.7.• . :,,,,t,,-,. -` •S NINa T:O ri SITE CMN L•AL :4C fNTE,11 \doom _ , , ,' �r i -- ,_ i . - _ a:_I' • - _4 ,.-::(-„---'- _-._ '-- .._. LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE -- ♦ t�. 4. • 41-47Narrv0 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) REUIS.ED,7;EXTEN$ION1.0F cop MENT..DEADLINE DATE: January-261-2000 February 2;i2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R • APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project;Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give'notice that a.DNS- M is•likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are-integrated into a.single;comment period.•There will be no comment period'follewirig.the issuance of the.Thresheld:Determination of NonSignificance;, ,, Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: ' ` `-•• • December 15,-1999• • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January- 000 February 2;2000 - Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: • Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character-of development if one-has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use ' •."No specific`development projects=will•beC processed;or reviewed:Ss part of.this ' non project'application: This application is`to revise the Comprehensive.Plan • - designations and zoning from a mix of designations'and zoning;refer the • - - project description,that permit a variety of commercial,Office and low density - . . residential:uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that Is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. • Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August-25.1997 January 31;2000. . - Development Regulations . •LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental i . regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager,- Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on Febwac -83-2 09•February 16,'2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • J -o • F 10°"rk r�'}`' 1-�'''- e,..•.v• 3r� Merlino SR 900 Property : .� , NE S„ti,D__p,,=��i;• �,1s• •� i,. 1.- ,°� P] . Comprehensive Plan Map ` . t =1p S _�i'. ' �- ° , ° , ill 1 Amendment and Rezone -�••pl.v s ---".' :a o/JIB. 1 '�It� ;G74.l.a .9, 4 p 1.*-- 6'F''`r— .� �!al,k ,, 1�•rf' 1 '6i/> .-° i.-.• `� Io: vg I I t I �� •I• J . TRACTS m ' o `' I d � • .. .�, b v , IL ,�,• J 1 '' � H a , 1 , •IA 51• I ! • el • . • -fir .k `t• .crHn Sr '1 1 �•�._.�Kam:• xx Cc �,,_ /IJrN SN II.r7 o I •'• I'=:d"To.;Hi -: .; 'iv t ;' .I• .I L a•••,j0 rl,j� 1p1,l.{,I, •a .._.*I �•t• '.1..=' i. _.� "�.? V..1.'. 1^ 1 I IIIIII.1 1 I ID .,......,_ a [Do •, C'°.AS lPC z I F L..,... ♦ �. .';'l I P03 w;. 'i.w, ', , 4019 ttiy P o'' ;,, I'ilL, r „ 1-aG 1 ,} p --1-2--_ _ 1 11oew+rl I lKQ . la y I p~ 1 i it `oun .V'm. th_i �_1;.; i—L I.1�111.iRi©J , 1 ' �•„N0 •' '•a:•; H.' C 1 j', a. 9 �ti� . R• ..t_u,-�irt, �.`I ,,t °I,a.'- -- A • •••0 t' / Po d s,A 1 ' .p :Q: il. 6'b�4-1 ._• p �;-"�".7�„_g '°ol ' a .,4• ' Sg,.:•o ^`rS-••.�;"1- °'d; r L. .1'-, • �•�• , � i', s? 1 i5•: ,'poi .•; ••• rQ ��-e::�..�, '. •,:, '::.- -Y-P ,..i- ,.,,,,_," E- TT ¢k:n •`' ,� ` Oa' �1k V :.g�.a j ._ n. ,', o L`i-, 4 • % %s. a lLLE11/I�I _� �� (Proposed) "'ee +`�.,.c' :;/Qm'_ 1 a o ll��i.o; J��/� Ir 1 , , I , I , I r 1 cA..hdq v'.,....1 „.• .' a• ,or\� !4,•.• ', a.,J+lo 'ri ••c , T i y.,.-- s vyi, 1L• .. + %r •�': QJ:'- 1 ..4' J7 .' n: . t i I J r•� C,E.ha •!'h±t.1 •��vl `'9,I a�'•c"� •'f�);1" e`'YC 1 .- .> ! f al C .� 'r+, PcjJ ?:. S•';•' •? (•6.1 ' <rio a �;�rO Hc1E.h,m CO. ^ ..�5/. b 1 _ 9. .o E..•l' `V •R -• ' , n /n „ 19 11 r• .e/•`., i - �e ,`"v+:.� /EVR-0o`O_ Y.'.•J •J 0• s. �s6 . QOra� .s� : ,,t•-1 . . . .r =iajd7ys •,�.j. AitiO f a s`/ TT J I GM WI , + • rl . i' L Sr C0.1":::':,l •' V ;..0;,a r. :f.'.•kil H, d° !\ti r1' t • CO • I $�•' ar fib.,, 1 CO ',, 117 w F .. % '„„,,,, piP"'"'" 'auk 1 • . r....1 _,+Vp 1'1- ...\= N• igrll` A 9 H 1 11.0 T 0'r; 1 T E C H H C A L S'C E H T E 11 e" .0 : �."..�`•`` 1 ri.•"'e"‘ "'.- .1,1''( i 1...%1 10.(. k r,..., ::- ...„ • ,. LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE c: p CITY OF RENT_ON �a T.pc = '....--,; ----t-7, tm rem.....m.�•.,d ea Planning/Building/Public Works a � va®1 m REASON CHECKED, , .� � FEB 0 3'0 0 4 UEta a Q .3 Q 5 T055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 unclaimed t� Refused ,"ChTT crPB METER ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED Attempted Net Known + 715840E U.S. POSTAGE Insufficient Address No Such Street No Such Number fec °:-'`1 C'` ,c^ In State---` 00 not remaiI in this enveiop€ 811990-0370-04 ° -AEFFREY J.HOFFMANN 33_SW.SUNSET BLV APT G37 y_-vRE`NTON WA 98055-2289 'I '`•'/ VswillrprarnsiIf Itdtlft1t I11 lli!!hIlI!Ii!!tilI111441 it E1E11i1lltitilh1I1 ♦ ♦ NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) REVl$ED,-EXTENSION i0F.COMMENT.:DEADLINE DATE: Januay-26,2000 February 2,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the:City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a-DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS=M"are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non: Significance;,,; Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issiiance-of th&DNS-M: .. , u t, :- L...AON 'December15,1999 PERMIT APPLICATION DATE:-.;..,. �.... . ,.. � .�;. .; NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: ,. .:. 21,2000 Fetiruary`2,.2000 • ' Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430 • - 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in . their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36,70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, .infrastructure,and character of development if one has beep made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination Of the project's consistency with thezoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land User._;,,,i No specific,deVelopment projects:will be processed or reviewed as part of this :;); - ,:;rion-project'application:'This'application!is to revise the:Comprehensive Plan • . .,:designations and zoning from'a mix of designations and zoning,refer:to the: project description,that permit a variety of commercial;office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that Is focused'primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated Augurt2,5 1897 January 31,2000. Development Regulations 1.UA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its • RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other ' applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on Febwar,-82O00 Febrruary,.16,'2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: • ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE'IDENTIFICATION • o Ku., ' „ ,..1 ...➢ ,'T.a 6. 6� M• . .9;n„M+. NE 1 .'• : t `• ; :,sky?'v. -? •. Merlino SR 900 Property ; 4'4. ; • Fi..� �F,, t eg.5 `p' • Comprehensive Plan Map I °a©• 1,1 .-. �I .o� ," a zr .b _ I,.� . ° tall^ �S[`17G.1'�R�+:'r7., ��• :•- -��'-.; ,_::. ,';-• .cy�'21: 5 •'I _f d°M -._. ° • ➢ ilizo Amendment and Rezone 1 . , :°, -+:_°l v •a "1 �y-�� = ca 4ro I Q'� .I, . I ' TRACT) o :_ t 5 (.l:I I 1 e't ' i_ ; rail, _I:•-It,:4 s t ,n ' - ..—_� .�` .:.' ! PO MO fr 4 --'~�.�:3C y'l�.r. 1-7 '` >..,. ... - 't?` ' r1St•• zf,'• I I `'o •. M R ED \\�-O - � � �TZ�.�-'•je▪ a -•fir- -!�..1._;F��srk `�1•%: .• .�. w jFz•i�l y.j, .l41 . I o�'`!;�4.• t • •• ,•- i. • t. 4,a tl i :I I d 10 I �� :� _ •tI. •Ef I.4.NY QP.E: ■' — .z;..` AC.F .,. ,�,`"'.. .'.,'i I oci ; r .141.41=2 P o' ?,1 i,j yQ t I I zs TON --`.— ,�•� I I q.t. •0 rl•1• I / II--6 '•••t:. ,. __ •' 1� 1 I ••s 14", I ° • EgRI-1 Ply_.,_ !_L r! m L•,j_p1,��•L�j 161.l lY,1-, r f c, •1• -.. Iyrm� •:., "..:..' i' ' i i•? ,,--.'�.-_�1s', rV �. ^.•y' ._s_�0.t a--L�L�....,4 p : 2.!' �q'•v '•• tS ;fog o p➢-A 1 .e 'q ` � . 1,.Q:1rlfi44 8 iS rc, p iS;•. boa;- .,. r0 r o rs•_,- •L....m..a' .4G .,.-/ 1�::.•-":.!-..-., 1� ., r•l•v,..4.,-. •• r0.Ln:/r fit. , 0,.. p • :.• ..rq-� .�� `.i1ri, ci ..417.I•I •t�• i ,4•,la-. 11 I A•t ,,R A7 .t&(g 1 0 f ..,f., '�I,rat OQ.�•Jr- -._y: • 4 .. .24 {j/'*y'},' -I I , I •i ,61,� - , .1 t�'..n• 7,J1, �:1`�.,r',},r� 4�. .i`+I' r. �, °° a O • •.4 o L4 q M•► ...EA:r -. T A'T T • gsr.•• • .. t_ _ .➢i tR..••' • , �q"•. �iir°•-. . -e'� • -I (Proposed) e. :➢b +�s'Sr n, .j!:6� � I :a ,V o:o:' rig')Ii- ' , I . , I . I , I , : I CA N IN•....1_ t .(•. ,�•' o.\°• •I / of 'r� � ` ..•�:'7--:.iL�...... • '5 Mix$ 1 .!" n'1' r ♦ A4''p `j •,��•/' F`r j`•r fir: i 1'H I i 1 f— ` co,,,„„, •� - • i;q353 f'i..I - ° ' • •Ff'r, M,a..i:, s� ;:n A 6,y (Existing i ' yb�',17 c o /C ��rro !/f"— acxEfNu.o1 CO. ��> �` 3�/.�' ..: 47 �'i� • �/rw ■ - IIO •- Qdn `�])7/_ -.•..4 - il PJS.Q.P��'o.°•�J'I"•'� Esc+i,f, r '�� S • a . i: 1•11 \ �cb' Cl. -406" I SUM•�, t / ,:• X -1 : -r -J . •1 a7H1 b,. '\• J "-ao:'LQ'C.•'�'}.. "',a{-7(J�� 'Y'-• 9 ° br, S\ it I -1 ■w= ▪ .,c�...} " a�a �I J •tom r•f. .� �'t I r . ._\ _��'j1 V+-f!_ -"•"•Y�•_F' A 4 M 14.0 Tf0 I'IT E C X Mc'A LI- t • roam, •N' ;4C E N T E A ,,." 'e , ....-.... . --r._._i_. G._ • y• .7.-.- .� ,•-.---,-.--- .-� - _' • --S{•1.�:• Zf ' ,a.e. _ fr—.r/ l)--.—.�.Lam• _---�._�.—.�� .�.--fr... • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE 0 p CITY OF RENTON aT - -� sal/ Planning/Building/Public Works a �' b 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 M FEB 0 3'0 01 ® .� 0 5 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED pg V9®1 I u.S' V oT�•" 392660-0010-00 __ .-BONIFACIO C.LIMON 9030 SEWARD PARK AVE S APT 50 OSEATTLE WA 98118-6072 NOT DELI YERABLE y'-- a P.S.ADDRESSED _ 833L® 4: UNABLE TO FORWARD s — I RETURN TO SENDER ti W� ;',to - ( t { 1! r ! i J ,}ray �(p ) j ) i,' t : ¢ T '"7`9" �' ��t�llf!l�ll�flll�till�llilllFll �IIS�YtIl11tF��Sii.1,'.54 'IZ�3'3�i1t1.1it11F)!�l!!fl • • • • 0. 11 � e 4 4. • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) REUP.ED- XTENSIONOF.COMMENT:,DEADLINE • DATE: January 2000 February 2,'2000 • LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R • APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW • OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED.(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,.the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed.project. Therefore;as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to,give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods forthe project and•the-proposed DNS-M are.integrated into a.single:comment period.:There.will be no comment.period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS7M):,&14-day appeal period will follow thesuance of,theDNS-M:. PERMIT APPLICATION DATEr "' December 15,1999 NOTICE OF•COMPLETE APPLICATION: '^n w.,ear 2000 _. w •"� j=ebruary 2,.2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and . recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. •Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 • PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. 'CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: • Analytical process _ Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and'applicable development regulations,or in •their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, Infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall _include a determination-of the project's consistency with-the=zoning;comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use:._ ;. :,', '_ . . , :_ No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of•this - non-project application., This.application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and'zoning from a'mix of designations and zoning,refer to the -project description,that permit a variety of-commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), • that Is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that • Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated Ate,1997 January,31,2000. . . .Development Regulations LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE- Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development • • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its • RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on FebFuary-8,2000 February 16,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • ° M' f>< 1,e= ij,-a= '" ' Merlino SR 900 Property ,.0 , "_ �� • •r} NE a a•• r. p�1:• •'...••j, +• •fie• -.-.-.-.3-�� 1 �k4 '• CompMap a`oa© � . ss,;;�=,-, .b;.-.., rehensive Plan � 'v _��""' _sV1- 1 ° p rV- Amendment and Rezone ;° i::°P ,� �- -"•" �a ib''"'s .�4Ct`� ��q-` 1 .r.,,..,r ,:.n P._ _•, 1 C>j�j/.+�©• ',o� -pt.. . ta►cts[_a o� .. , • Y-1;5.1�• •e I( Iblal I r�nLLs •'a �I ',4 z `I' .ir'•xY� T'"..-�. . _ -. 'Ft� I !' I 1 el -� ;F� d 1;, •. s�0 ' '• 15e I N° S/ f •OtNO f/ L_. _•L-.r _ -=' ' `"�`„�, s/i. •- 0 6, • 'b"m', { ' I J M R • 1 'fit• °•- - • 1,,.- •�•, i' � u�, .- 7! � � • •L 4 •.Jd r1 1p-�1 1,1 •0��Ey. j� �1N %.•r 7 1.:7,'� ,•1 •!- :'j:.i.'i-r-;.., . ?�> 0'�`A t d R• .I. +. '�, I•• Ei q t. 'S•- I„ ,. 1_ 'Q /'� `61I•tl•Lf 1 •I 1 q`7 16 ..1 6.1 P 0 '2 -is' �! /�•.�/I P E `�i/�, •zt a•,1 Aq t "',, "t4%%IA - .I.�.I��OI,A• ,i.y,y� ^ ttty ..;..,. 0' 11 4.••J IV o In f•a.•� 1 [+-'°E:1;t01L-6-r°°-- t ` •..- :tt i�'�'•cul 8 r-i'1 Cs � �,,ry '°o, •,. �J"'................ ....,2h.�.�•„,�"•-1- mar 1^, 1 + ' i .1.1 ,•I,v,l.d',:'hi ,H �.elt:' ' 0°'•. . -'p'•.' ,D'4.."ry�,�1''.: �v`•c q, • II ;.j = i_I I •j' eij�,j1� ` a-.;i tr,..++°.7) 1r.�a:1' ' 'I';: >a,e�1 >�+•• wr.,. 1.1' .0, r. a;:.§d-tt`4i 9v:.:"-"b "•,•'�' .--�' ' � lII%� r•' ` t., r1j, :•g.;:o 1 p ,U' rJr ,o Pi' Q V,.foq•• R., •.1.. ' a'.2.. --0 't fil:.""I: .• U Q@t"*... II _ I _ 1 4154;RII� rProposed) ien f . m o •/Ga E•. 1 , s I •. ' , f I J CAR.'4..4 4o..1 •';;� .,,..'. \+'e •I j:!"'•..!n .,4, fa:f.�.�,•it. • B 1G,y Ic,a.u,q I • r�' ~' /•►�� •`-•... h 0. •I' •..:.:.I-.•_ , 4,of v1.-o o .r O. .-1- \ I, I, I Z n�'1W��•nF�-/�'a"y.p S�71 L��+;7. • 1s�. ..` H i:." . , J'+ •4., • -,la `t9O� r, n.tZ-k1 _.� �',�rt• 9 • to -t 1 :. „,.:. ,,, ,. —,,, ro "„ . •' , n+ ,a`r, • ,.,..,... i �;:I'' .. i- .. r f `. CO -• 11i• 11 r •8_':, . ar „ . %ib ; . , •ZelS7.0,JES*491r21/4 .. ...., ",,, ' ' :.. '''. "I.4..."'• • •fit••�'_� ASH 1 11.O,T'°•11,"IT E C H N C•A L,VC E N T E,11 i • ; •.� LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE 1.11.111. liplit { - _•4..�i 't 0 I CITY OF RENTON • � � .� Planning/Building/Public Works ','. a66 3 WA&A CI 42 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 I... JAH 2 T 9 0 al' h� 3 W CO it . ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED S. POSTAGE * di52-E:4101 it 'I=P.' ,O 11,10. R ilfgt Wi Ft e +40I -17392660-0010-00 BONIFACIO C.LIMON 9030 SEWARD PARK AVE S APT 50 OSEATTLE WA 98118-6072 Y AS ADDRESSED , - e34 a _ UNABLE TO FORWARD yam' �^l fie' E a'.-L fl V Ci ram,:P , �E iJ ! ! ! !! I ! }1 it ! ! ! }' ! .11. TUBA TO ^NDER G„ \--;'� � bd- f1,l,Il'din+,,,r,l„I;I,,,II,I , ,.,,.,.,,1..,,,.,.,,. ,�,.,,,I,.,,.,., :„�. • fVY i LIR NOTICE :OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OENON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. • PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December.15,1999 - NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: :January 21,2000 • - - Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,.Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton ' Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density • - residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• Development Regulations • • Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure • standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 • I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION 1__' 1 _ CJ _ .y,__ I _,Ctl 1 I I � e \.��_ t i P d i• „ •-y'11s:= Jet�. Merlino SR 900 Property444, ,o; �. n' ` '' -R ati•`�`:� Qy, 1 ' ° Comprehensive Plan Map 'F�o570' •�+ .�1• • w: °' ---f- o ' �-m� Amendment and Rezone ' °. ¢ • O' --•••' 0„..._4•r` •b 1 gal Ei I� :..•.�_.�sell�)Q'r7 OOOOOO o+vi . qn.r :'u' � jroco: �� T' i4 Iti. ,�.I. r:T.;.,...•.,,, ,w.._ ' .1 .V1 .1. ar•'�-- --�+ __— — -• •.. -R' ;▪ y4•'ti Q] ,a; k I . 1 o a., iI I. 1 i r l r 'B I �L• . :i r •1 1 i 1 1 i t:-l'-%,"''';'"•••:-... '6 tu.0 .'. '-'•7-'j;;•.iop pRE y•--- -- 0,.,s.__:• • t` Ir t� •.i Z.A. 9 aJ��i�.�:r��A vJ�'. •a� •''1.•A I : •-1 . N. '. • m 4• a".g l r.'me I_'7 . M, `,r m 7 m 'u ,•a.....1__ '•a 0 • . .h`J • ..„..... . ... , 0 . . ...-- .,fi ,-.9,.,-. .-..-:_:::,....„... ,,_....„-. .e eir co• E-•7'A',T II ,' L,e••. •+� . 1p•(.•,~� a0.•i •o rQq��aro •IL he r, • 11EE ►Iwe 1 ...' " I. -• ,••-�i: S1ra .7 q.,p) t �` :.•r •-•° �`•I. " 1 (Proposed) "'":',,; .j; p�: . .cr /y - !.:r „/;, (r�' t ` .1i , I. COIERWIN) • •� • 'd•1...;=•..•i , `/,o`• •:• Lo...-ov,o r7i" ,F �`N (L,l la !i �1j0 •l" ■/�_ •' •-... '. O94,,'1:r6 SS.;•.•/•�,� •:*•�•o -a.° 1'4;43 Cr'''L Cpi I ... ; / R.1E...) vv. ',7"�� + •:::-Its1; y r;▪) fY• o' jid" ✓ • • : • ' � QA,F• hti� br %E9T 1 - - •. a 46` 0 i5� 'ib, .;,u, .,L •':C N �' f � T-.'. 1r . R� 7 „ klAt • /* k \ ' :". ( P. �,ram,. II -i CO „ •7` •O •o,+,r '1}-,4+'• •'N,.. !I A!N•I I. ' Tio',11 IT L 0 N N,:•CAL C !N T L,N ' LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• ... __ , ..... . . 0 0 CITY OF RENTON .. . im............ ... ,..., ,,„.„,==_,......7, i .-.. selL Planning/Building/Public Works 4 46 — 42 * '' ,Vqz*gfe. rc -1 ; NV A; ft o c.' i JAN 1 fri_...1511.4 :: 05 * - 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 co I— 21'00 3 0 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED T 0.44 el? '- .17...k.. '' 30401 u.s. PoSTAag * • -".• • . 298880-0165-06 BRYCE E.BROCKWAY . SEATrLE2320 HUGHES AVE SW _ ...,, .. WA 98116-1836 c_it.i(Je A:, , UNABLE TO f On/hRO ''',-7:--P-- . "1 ifi di ..4.:-ZiP' • k ,•-• RETURN TO SENDER \-.-.7 ,--0:')- - RUNP 5.11.11 ' iiiillifilimilimild ________.- --__..,..-- ',-'-' ' I • Development Regulations - , ' Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development , • • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations Including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure • . 'standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION (, • a:o8 n .• et,• ` ice`. G1'71.61 oy"'Y.,r: f1-6...-.-�.:- ovI ea:41 �� I?4••.� it .b•g�,dl 6. I do•R`: . NE �"i��' s'•1--- •8' •` ' Merlino SR 900 Property 1•_4..m;,..-• •�y• ,_;- °� eith b �' ° • Comprehensive Plan Map 1 _ . 0 1 - -- Amendment and Rezone i°.-'" ` :r ' : • Nbi• gat 'p v ':..-,.•�.i Q/A ' v.i_�)44D��i'.�a�� 1•0• .°•4 1ti.r^ _ •I. 14:pi.:•I•i .I. ,I.C+i Y•1,.' ,.17,,,,. y��`yss i 1P,•r;TS O OI � .1. 1O�i � . �: e I .. fII o. "" v•- _-' - - 1. I , 4+� a +•°rra iilh,9 .. • 1 •'� -•�� :..Lk.1 0 •.-. �a�t_- `:1k'' /uiI6,--r0•._i_1_,•1mtq ' I 1 I I ?, .' M RLi; • •' •` p•i ,t ,-._.-. ' .... -•--•`.,, s a�17'• •k•• b'-ti.{ I I.T. i':o .. r' r I �A 1 °',, • '� t' I I, I r f I O4�d rl �_ l 1,1. `�[.,:.--� '.�n.�...'a '".��ui ..•1_.`-i-r V�®�`sr.'-•.y4.....:.�,r41. 'q nip,.!•1•I'hli�1''y(•,, �P� 1 ; �`61 p• • 1 i 1 14, La ,r i ci1, ` ' .•y. �S� :.i i ./! �,4 ; (' •'e• g�o;i .— •- 11 `s'�8... 1 :■I. u1 A •� ,rVfo ..''c„u.•�•_ o: : I. be 1 �..,. 1 Epp t lu„ rl M v...7. bI . 16,a, t,, i •..I 6 '� N`m�-..•.�.,.+g.'`r '„•,• I O ; 1'1 r, . • .• Vim. • •"1r ` - �.{' Q, 4 �, ..B.rJ . ' . 9 o f4i_ .. /V, `. 1••' .,,T•�.ems'..-1• . • .N�- q -,4.. .. ''�F 1,.' .I.1 ri". . 1m'I . "'•.`,�AQ'•.41DO'y ± 'le' ��,i•' •::::v.':•;'••..-::P•4p• i1�.• •-_, s { �y, °M.•,S.. I � .5��• j — ilig 41n.. i.I ; •r. 1 (Proposed ea�ti •sF )7.'0� 3 �;I I CA MO.; ) 1 . • • .1 •' s + ' ' � � ` R p I({ate ,1• DJ of 4 ; 1 1 i I '� Rom, ç ' ; '-19 �s_•.1' • (3. + • 4. . • • O'4'•Py .;�•'.{`:,�„%'`TV' ..''.0 ty'3 '��✓'�' ,S°�T • .r �tj�•:' :_`_._..._..... _.. ..m,,.0 \ Oo C+ J.,„1iFoK,�• •••, [ /./.' .N N j't�' u. t— J'••-=.+..• •11' •'" q 1 • r, P(�j,4kPc''i¢�0V14:1'k11. _, T n ip 6, /'''.....' ...."' ..11%,,i tr). . , ,,_,„,,• 7sPIPO.-/!.0.it-.44-WC9# 1 1 .... ■ QL..1 bl .r^ • .[ L• yy„ L_ = F.,••+'�F ` A S N t a.o Tio{U IT[..N, •:'c�A,L ;c_[N T[,11 I_ / 1 •'� • Ia.PP • ' no II *�1 _ -fi r LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE • • -NT0� NOTICE OF APPLICATION , AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: . LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. • . PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION:.; January21,2000 . ._ , Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. . Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether,a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application.(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a.determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning,from acmix.of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial;office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: -, Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. . . ._..,,,,. .• • • --....-.:.6; ..fir-_-_,._20.4. . salL Planning/Building/Public Works . ...,„ co , 6 • , Ave ___ ,..- ct / . \ fo,,' zit JAN 27'0 0 :thactimigo/-1411 E 0 3 0 5 :* ', -4/320,41, ca o 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 ea 1-. u.s. POSTAGE * CH bRictj/R:fsfc:11:caS°1::6:1-.ie-fittnE:rt‘:.1:::57:: 1.033-891::::.e°::71:— ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED a T.,,E1 64 .-%' .7 RE ...1.FiriviiTEa El FAt PI V i. * Q C-- 811990-0370-04 Di\ice:nsout.'r'eri,17"7,`-b7n tate--------- --,,, cL, 0,, 4--- . - JEFFREY J..,tIOFFMANN 833 SIASO4SET BLV APT G37 RENTON WA 98055-2289 r---- -1 , 'RETURN <-------------;::--,, .,..1 ,,e --it.,,,„ • ITO WRITERc--''-' 1 . u-....- • _ IADDRESSFE i°DL - 1-1 14'1 .1' \\.:Z.___.:iekr-OVrii-36);--' -'4•;"VIC-efr---.7— Iliiiiiillilimililitiiiiii11,1 III ii ii I i f"E lilt MI I liiii:iffit!DINIffiiii if ___..._—•• - I • • 61(VY Y$.) • • .4'NT0� NOTICE OF APPLICATION - AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION-OF NON- • SIGNIFICANCE -MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. • PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: :January 21,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.706.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan_ , designations and zoning from a mix•of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density -• ` '' `•' ''residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997.• : LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• Development Regulations . • Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I Toning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations Including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,•environmental regulations,Infrastructure . standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. • Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • • • Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I S—.•... . . ^ ,-.----. _q— ' • �cv 1 1 . +Rob. i. . iml: Pi • mih uukiiii7 iL.�'...., {w�o::a. ^ :Ib�"' d�6v �, i.f?t'• __ NE }xi/K'{e .`I.:�.= ;8,. '. n. •-• , Merlino SR 900 Property ; ;a; • [} �' �'. ..ci?-t a ° `g71" • . Com Comprehensive Plan Map1 _Th.. • ��'- ' .-'r 1 .... .- Amendment and Rezone 1 -' • :- ' VNILF 4.1.9;9, 4G7� 'St5- — �.: ,:•} lti ,'"I, iiI,j. .l. ,I, ,, , '�• ESUy ��, • �.-:: ica m; 6• no. ! 5. I WINO sr �,._.., • s 0.e'O :. IN ' -''•i I I I { •: � .I , I •• 16, �' ',/. -- ..— —.`I. -j1� 'u tt ' iii T • 1' I.a 4 b V'I.�� li 1.1, ti 1 ; !�,C�, yrryo 1-1r. 1.`.:rui� sr.. (a' /Do '.I. Y.•i'i 4 .0-. �T „„1,...1 141 10 ,I.,.. ...; 4•+p4, -arw • fQ II ' t1 1•41} P�m-• rb •. yN6TOn: ,•� ,�'��... I.�c.l pA. .� tutu o- :4•�•. _ ' . t i'a r'"', I EaPi :�1, 1 "" Vi••-�Ii l Q.16!4 s',, as;7, f 6 '� - ,l_ , i I 11.�•) ' . ' 1 I y •^ 1' .ar"t>r • r oJ•�•i_e`•vq.� Orly •00 I:;p 1 .. '� ....,,,.�3!. .1.1.i" ''r.''aj' .�.L", _:;;; 11 0o' re.: r. '-• ;I. 9 0 r o ��} q . . 33 to i. ••. '..•�: r•oa i c 4 yt` ,` ... =!'1• S?"i r� � I '� •r d •_y t.. „t`�1.. �.,;.(� 'f�• c 4T.�.1.:•- •..�bi • �• • /1�T • .�..., I'.� �, 9f3.• :,;ti. ,!J .G.....„.„,....„ yY� ;:y / 0.0_ao r1 .,, i f •ate . , �Jl�r`Lri L �I-I'11# "' (Proposed) ~'• K�anti s• •' :�'.Otp� , y o a'E'u'•ra•�i ' ( I 1 1 G ad";mums) V •OS ar,• ,1 • •�.• :z�• :.� )kr• 1 I . 1 1 a 1 1 1 , �$.. w - .'Y.'. j 'L'4''., y:. # r,` n• '' . ' •�)f a';! ', i , s "r�i �Y rn1�a4ua1 �� •. 7.• ' `f`i..!A • 1, ',19�P ?o,'* 'I''o `( tia o e d / ma 1"`•,u eSe7 . to �' `:.. 6••• I Qom` . I a- '�b� —%! , \ IC "�. Ira a-„ 4; 1 • i., Pi Q_tf ;•; it,.: ,.,.. +'*tt,ti U Jq" ':r i I•� __ �` -_ � . .'. '' Ire• •. �1•..7:, ./ ..-f.......... c . - , .. - � ''llJi '1 -� . pi4.q •x _ rat,. �._w A L N, T��CI ;T L C N N,.C A L !IT A . • en_ LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •. , 0 0 CITY OF RENTON ad/ Planning/Building/Public Works '2,1 CA '''' CC '',4714:13,9 ..q. L (Pa ,..-i#4 t. t., -00,Aiie- _ C.) ! JAN 2 7'0 0 1 ri'd Jr?At - ri N. n 5 * —... 0._., w . 4 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 0 40 I-- kkgrErare. ' * ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED POSFE TAGE i4 cc) ,,u/v, Rez`10/:,-,7 '614-0 r- :tise, erl /-,- , --1-7------ 4,--"c7)-i:6°'(1.---.. ' ';'.r.;,,-\„. ::-.. 81199040120-07 r •<gr°.'1:s RHON . "' '' ......‘4- !_:.47,5,7,-) /// . L e - „............., --, -DIVIPLEOD AN Li 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-12 12i.,` `, 1)St -----.._ RENTON WA 98055-2296 if) pe "----......„ — / ..., .4., U/Y6 . • RETURN . .:-..., ------ 1 i — ra'cr ‘.. ''%' . • ,,,...-.., TO WRITEFIY,.-- 1 ... 1- -,F.% • -....,.., A D n Q F cz(-' --7'-'------q-. '5 • t.:1 f..... ,,,fit': 51 _IN cl_.4,-Ziel IUNKNOWN --, ,_„>, \--C3Ali. lii421.9341:2.2. 11111111111111111111-11filllillii 1 - I 1 1. 1!1:1011M: L._ ' 1 4-11...„,..- - .. Development Regulations - Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development . • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I Zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations Including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development. regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. • Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. • • Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically • become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION r—. -•• r 5 ' =— �Cb • I [ _ II ��_ •....rxva•'r'—��/",,!+, P 'mF: p,.T7761. 'i ...... � ___ P.Q ti " ' ' Ro.. i. ;;e,. -• Merlino SR 900 Property ° ,13; . ,• rq. � R;y 1 ''' tf . 4tj•�':� 4 64 ° • Comprehensive Plan Map ; ';_ '� ' s C • �'• t Amendment and Rezone . - :°.:a4 • :- e.4.5w40 6�i ca� W. 'I T 4 I,‘-et ' (` .'' 6,'=•''1'i' IPA" „lc 1 •'�. SPA :. • • _ t• a_�•.I I.J " _ :��-_�': _.L.:;l i , s y.o.ro rr 4 7:4.• �ae"0 m I 1 1 6,1 tht i 1 I I I •. J; p t e o• ice'^-- ., e we57.,7•• ,,I,,,..,,,-,,,,� I F\ —=� — - -:;��. — — ..... �,R w ut'`to ; e, • I' • •.�,1'e a.,�b rl r 1 ,.I. a 1 ;.y1.1. .�a.4�.V V. I. rN `:4i,tl"fa .1 jF1i `I r m-fs,..-.•..-•^- :: [a n>�9:•f•1.1. yr� (• P " . zt_tilA.- - 4 Y� 1 f' I,7 to �°'t v� • .. o' a3 !•41N ` i� zEd 7N6____., _ l ,,�,... .I[ I� 41�j�y�. r .1 dP�11vt a' vim.. 1 an I • R, 11931' WI' r`n I,. b Yg 6 r . -�1.1,,,, q 4„f' ' .•..��w•• •D /' ��•..'�,:�A I •1. ' ''� ' ♦ V. 1.,,' 8 ;9!�TWj pi y0. . �'I .',INS^•Y'-..i, m .. sue' q `Th,•• '3t 't .t...�4• .+. t� �� ,rN Ilar gyp" 4 're' .�i}•'......•r•:•--.--...4z 'n' • �, I ##-%..)) r ��yI'rr "",•••y�. 1 rit' .7-•• :ice Ca i'S� "t R 11��III M�1 (Proposed) .nti �.� �•.a�: , II o '1':. , , . { , , . + t : I ,I,u.,rrr....t •,f °! .: S ro ' ll ({�, a)• ° r • ( 1 LH 1 I .. .I.n.a • g.hi....y., . .• I',•n'q•q ..e^°..0.3•.�r I,/ I I ,,e ."*. • gyp4cj r :IV ''•�•�l-' O o ,• '�4H�T tbe....11 I -_ ac 1 V�. �� -••. t' q`9?-DI.F ' .•:i:1i'�'.. :;?r - 'O!$I��.. fit+. t Jo ) iE.l.u.a ,.. > b bz WI-41 m�,,0?.91 14:1 I e •r. •[ •4 !R."•�'i:i-•J o• , j .Spit xi r'•. _._...._- ,..._...• `7 J n J. , :o:, '�. j �: for J'.w"�'1 � '' -I J^ al wl �O �I '•tog(��K'�� .�i'• h r � i � L /� N ,� • I:r'' 'feu.wo �� I F( y,,00y:.�°. ,,, ;.• �, u k', e ; ,�iC _ 1,`- -_ ' ,. t ..„-'::.. '�'.,I. .� _ _ tin I..L w.. •?1 1 \ -4 t. I A!.* �A.,p'.4.•4l IT L;C'N �C [M•T![A _` -I LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE • LAN NOTICE OF APPLICATION • AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED'(DNS-M). DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: .January 21,2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: . No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic . .. uses. . . • .. . Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. 2000-M-6POR - , A J J Craig J. Stone,P.E. Joe Pomerleau Mark S. Gnagy Area Administrator-Sough King County 833 SW Sunset Blvd.F-32 321 Powell Avenue SW :.; " _ WSDOT,NE Region Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055-2254i. PO Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Ea Ed Mallary David Halinen r.`-' Susanne Krom Friends of Black River Halinen&Associates 4715 ''/ 36th Avenue SW 7524 S. 135th 10500 NE 8th,#1,900 ;},' Seattle,WA 98126-2715 Seattle,WA 98178 Bellevue,WA 98004 ft:,-= Kim Brown Tom Malphrus Patrick Texeira 1003 N. 28th Place , 18713 102nd Avenue SE 1013 SW 3rd Place (--7-7= Renton,WA 98056 Renton,WA 98055 Renton,WA 98055 .• . Joan McGilton Connie&Jordan Heiman Rose Clark 2640 SW 164th Place 110 Stoneyside Lane 16856 Des Moines Memorial Drive Burien,WA 98166 St. Louis, MO 63132-4124 Burien,WA 98148 Jerry Chroman Araya Sol Anne Offenbacker 438 NE 72nd Street 3238e NE 100th Street 10225 SE 28th Street Seattle,WA 98115 Seattle,WA 98125 Bellevue,WA 98004 Jan Mayrhofer • Sharman Badgett-Young Didi Catherine Anstett 12047 69`h Avenue S 6925 185th Place SW PO Box 17023 Seattle,WA 98178 Lynnwood,WA 98037 Seattle,WA 98107 Hugh Jennings Davidya Kaspersyk,AIA Nancy Thomson 16116 NE 4th Street Architecture Urban Design.BioRegional Pln. 12500 SE 100`h Street Bellevue,WA 98008 1050 N. 34th Street Renton,WA 98056 Seattle,WA 98103 Ted Mallory Ileen Weber Lynn Chapman 7524 S. 135th Street 12530 Admiralty Way,#J-302 12341 35th Avenue NE#404 Seattle,WA 98178 Everett,WA 98204 Seattle,WA 98125 Louise Baldel . Chak Ng Chris Barry ' 13020 SW Princeton Court 5536 18th Avenue South 1401 N. 36th Street Lake Oswego, OR 97235 Seattle,WA 98108 Renton,WA 98056 Ed Newbold Kate Stenberg,Ph.D. Elizabeth Dunn 4972 17th Avenue S. K.C.Wildlife Program Manager 1122 East Pile Street,PMB 1120 Seattle,WA 98108 201 S.Jackson,Suite 600 Seattle,WA 98122-3934 Seattle,WA 98104 2000-M-6POR • ' Robert Gramm Mike Keary Suzanne Zeeve,Ph.D. 5027 51st Avenue SW 2522 Monroe Court NE PO Box 2082 Seattle,WA 98136 Renton,WA 98056 Setauket,NY 11733 Teresa O'Leary Linda Radoff C. Gary Schulz 13715 SE 188th 6550 1s`Avenue NW 7700 S.Lakeridge Drive Renton,WA 98058 Seattle,WA 98117 Seattle,WA 98178 Joshua Steinberger Thelma R. Gower Ellen Blau,Ph.D. 303 Harvard Avenue,E.,B-1 2508 164th Avenue,NE 4525 89th Avenue SE Seattle,WA 98102 Bellevue,WA 98808-2317 Mercer Island,WA 98040 Richard Gandolfo Julie Haddad Ken Marquess 8114 NE 110th Place 3505 222nd Street SW 7605 S. 128th Street Kirkland,WA 98034 Mountlake Terrace,WA 98043 Seattle,WA 98178 Amy Black Jan Magnuson Marian Broida 395 Broadway R2B 21900 11th Avenue S. 5844 NE 7th Street,A303 Cambridge,MA 02139 Des Moines,WA 98198 Seattle,WA 98115 Laurie S.Almoslino Doris&Kurt Samuelson Stan Kostka 110 Florentia Street 10017 Upper Preston Rd. SE 28603 Kunde Road Seattle,WA 98109 Issaquah,WA 98027 Arlington,WA 98223 Nancy Wilson Corinne J.Berglund Shirley Tollefson 2861 SW 171st Street 1932 SE 16t Place 3611 I Street NE,#79 Burien,WA 98166 Renton,WA 98055 Auburn,WA 98002 Mary Marsh Trudy Davis Stewart Wechsler 7605 South 128th Street PO Box 2014 917 NE 63`d Street#20 Seattle,WA 98178 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Seattle,WA 98115 Kathryn Dugan Lynda Voigt Range Bayer 5834 NE 75th Street,#B101 15713 SE 148th Street PO Box 1467 Seattle,WA 98115 Renton,WA 98059-8807 Newport,OR 97365 Susan McClellan Jane Anne Haworth Anne Noonan 22826 105t Avenue S.W. 14449 127th Lane NE, S-26 9823 515t Avenue SW Vashon,WA 98070 Kirkland,WA 98034-1239 Seattle,WA 98136 2000-M-6POR Judy Tabak Tammy Lianu Susan Minerich 1024 SW 4`h Place 11025 SW 238th Street 12616 SE 232"d Street Renton,Wa 98055 Vashon,WA 98070 Kent,WA 98031 Barbara Petersen Emily Hamel Sharon Mathers 30902 5th Way South 4702 Davis Avenue S.,#2F302 8052 12th Avenue NW Federal Way,WA 98003 Renton,WA 98055 Seattle,WA 98117 Bonnie S.Kone Dwayne Anderson Margaret Oliver 23412 55th Avenue S. West Hill Community Council 1422 58th Avenue S. Kent,WA 98032 PO Box 78583 Tukwila,WA 98168 Seattle,WA 98178 John Middlebrooks Bruce Harpham Juliet Tharp 510 Seneca Avenue NW 4325 S. 343rd Street 359 Thomas Avenue SW Renton,WA 98055 Auburn,WA 98001 Renton,WA 98055 Clayton Gnagy Carl Haynie Richard&Susan Hopkins 108 Spring Place 2416 201s`Avenue SE 2511 Park Place N. Enumclaw,WA 98022 Issaquah,WA 98029 Renton,WA 98056 Lauren Braden Chris Clifford Theresa Henson 8050 35th Avenue NE 2721 Talbot Road S. PO Box 7208 Seattle,WA 98115 Renton,WA 98055 Tacoma,WA 98406 Don Norman Dianne Clancy Kathleen Crabtree 2112 NW 199th 446 S. 306t Street 115 Wells Avenue N. Shoreline,WA 98177 Federal Way,WA 98003 Renton,WA 98055 Carolyn E.Dubuc Jan Mayrhofer Carl Haynie 115 17th Street SE 12047 69h'S. 2416 201st Avenue SE Auburn,WA 98002 Seattle,WA 98178 Issaquah,WA 98029 Craig Fluvog Chad Adams James&Phyllis Saelens 6849 46th Avenue NE 13501 MLK Jr.Way S. 6915 S. 132nd Street Seattle,WA 98115 Seattle,WA 98034 Seattle,WA 98178 Mike Sanders Darlene J. Shevham Charles Mapili 13750 SE 23`d Lane 25418 139th Avenue SE 23167 NE 31 Bellevue,WA 98005 Kent,WA 98042 Renton,WA 98056 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4866 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION O.F CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM CO (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) TO RM-I (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY — INFILL) (MERLINO CPA REZONE#2000-M-6) WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as CO (Commercial Office); and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of zone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 3, 2000, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended by Ordinance No. 4855, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a development agreement pertaining to the subject property that would limit the maximum number of residential units to 260, require a one- hundred foot setback of all residential or recreation buildings from the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way that lies to the south, and require the construction of a 6-foot high fence along the south side of the development for its entire length, and a public hearing having 1 ORDINANCE NO. 4866 been held on August 21, 2000, and said matter having been duly considered by the City Council, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to RM-I (Residential Multi-family — Infill), as hereinbelow specified. The Neighborhood and Strategic Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (One parcel consisting of 8.47 acres with access from Empire Way South/SR-900) SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 9th day of October , 2000. Marilyn . P t rsen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9th day of October , 2000. Je Tanner, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4866 -� Approved as t orm: amyytehj Lawrence J. Warren, Ci y Attorney Date of Publication: 10/13/2000 (Summary) ORD.880:8/28/00:ma 3 ORD1NA C tNO. 4866 PROPOSED REZONE FROM "CO" TO "RM-I" • SOUTH OF VACATED BEACON COAL MINE ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION • That portion of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in the City of Renton, King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the Southwesterly projection of the Easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue SW (81st Avenue South) with the South line of Primary State Highway No. 2; THENCE CONTINUING Southwesterly along said projection to the South line of vacated Beacon Coal Mine Road; THENCE Westerly along the Southerly line of vacated Beacon Coal Mine Road to the northerly projection of the West line of adjusted Lot 1 City of Renton Lot Line Adjustment LUA-92-07OLLA recorded under Recording No. 9205219005, Records of King County, Washington; THENCE Southerly along said projected line to the Northerly line of the Pacific Coast Railroad (Burlington Northern Railroad); THENCE Easterly and Southeasterly along the Northerly line of the Pacific Coast Railroad to a line drawn from the Northwesterly corner of Lot 15 of Block 13 of said plat of Earlington and running thence Westerly a distance of 1,250 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said right-of-way of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company and of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company, said point being at right angles to the centerline of the main tracts of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company at a point .therein distance about 2,050 feet Westerly, measured along the centerline of the main track of the Pacific Coast Railroad Company as now located along said right-of-way from the intersection of said centerline with the East line of said Section 13; THENCE Southeasterly along said line to the South line of said Primary State Highway No. 2; THENCE Northeasterly along said South line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. June 9, 2000 Revised July 13, 2000 DLH 6759L.003 DJS/ca/ps • • • • • • • • • • 1". om N 0 M.L. KING JR. ga <�_ am 1Y o -, cal - �(P R�STATE HWY NO•(f i 1/ , to4,`. �W y J , „e c� q L.," L YSJ y � � Z lip GOV'T POB J� = : s ID ' --- S. 137th STREET (UNIMPROVED) LOT 7 1BEACON COAL. MINE ROAD VACATED ytP N b u� `o� z CO�' (ORD. — BY COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S JOURNAL 4) w CO" 4642) I —T VOLUME 29, PAGE 3 n _ / EARLINGTON z L Z 1 FACON COAL MIN ROAD O. ADDITION ¢M N N z& Z 8 7 2 y (ORD 1764 3 / .r EXISTING moo N^ ZZ • 6 5 4 /�/ B.N.R.R ZONING = CO \ z I I ww --►____ dNJb��I�U� d�®B41®b /y / ADJOS (PAc/F/ PROPOSED ZONING\ \ r� �CV 3�nui WZ Y® $CQY4@�I� /y I ; AD JU - 42 -..4 or, c44> • SST Di? cY �va Z ' : f3gf ' jai LUA-92rfc <<9 �� A N hSTREET / i `` 16 17 a1c l,'`, , J H c4 �,` 9 �' 10 i (9 J SUNP®INTC 15 ,�� i: ii. Z \ , 12 0�7 14 ` Z '� �� -- O x of �rSG \�`I,.' ��y0� \,\ro1 13 `� ` \` 19 18 J NJ Z w0• o CO `0 ` `` •� c~> r Q i /- `` 21 `` • • I N O z ,.., %,, `` 22 �•, �• w ._.1 V ` 23 `` s• s �. \` �` GOV'T c' I CC •• 24 �`` LOT 2 w Z • 0 0 250 500 LEGEND: O 0 25A ` IT i� �\\\\\\\\O F �� \\\ PROPOSED ZONING LINE v W — — z SCALE 1" = 500�re CORD. #) ORDINANCE NUMBER CC • l — POB —POINT OF BEGINNING ® SOUTH LINENS SECTIOry t3 — _ .File: P:\SDSKPROJ\6759\SURVEY\6759EXH3.DWG Date/Time: 06/12/2000 08:55 Scale: 1=500 Paul Xrefs: CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 4868 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE PREZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON'S POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREA FROM CA (COMMERCIAL ARTERIAL) TO RM-I (RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY— INFILL) (MERLINO CPA REZONE #2000-M-6) WHEREAS, under Section 4.2.020 of Chapter 2, Land Use Districts, of Title IV (Development Regulations) of Ordinance No. 4260 entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington," as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been prezoned as CA.(Commercial Arterial);and WHEREAS, the City of Renton initiated a proceeding for change of the prezone classification of said property. This matter was duly referred to the Planning Commission for investigation, study, and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 3, 2000, and said matter having been duly considered by the Planning Commission, and said prezoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended by Ordinance No. 4855,and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a development agreement pertaining to the subject property that would limit the maximum number of residential units to 260, require a one- hundred foot setback,of all residential or recreation buildings from the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way that lies to the south, and require the construction of a 6-foot high fence along the south side of the development for its entire length, and a public hearing having 1 C. ORDINANCE NO. 4868 been held on August 21, 2000, and said matter having been duly considered by the City Council, and all parties having been heard appearing in support or in opposition thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The following described property in the City of Renton's Potential Annexation Area is hereby prezoned to RM-I (Residential Multi-family—Infill), as hereinbelow specified. The Neighborhood and Strategic Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said prezoning, to wit: See Exhibit "A"attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (One parcel consisting of 17.54 acres with access from Empire Way South/SR-900.) SECTION II. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval, and five days after publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 9th day of October , 2000. Marilyn . Pe sen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 9th day of October , 2000. Je Tanner, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. 4868 Approved as o form: Lawrence J. Warren, ity Attorney Date of Publication: 10/13/2000 (Summary) ORD.882:8/28/00:ma 3 • ORDINANCE NO. 4868 - Exhibit A PROPOSED. REZONE FROM "CA" TO "RM-I" • NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF VACATED BEACON COAL MINE ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the Southwesterly projection of the Easterly line of Oakesdale Avenue SW (81 st Avenue South) with the South line of Primary State Highway No:2; THENCE CONTINUING Southwesterly along said projection to the South line of vacated Beacon Coal Mine Road; THENCE Westerly along the Southerly line of vacated Beacon Coal Mine Road to the West line of Government Lot 7 in said Section 13; THENCE North along said West line to the South line of said Primary State Highway No. 2; THENCE Southeasterly along said South line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. • June 9, 2000 Revised July 13, 2000 by DLH 6759L.002 DJS/ca/ps • in m .. ZI( en zaw�ty, 0= �- 2 w m cD 0 M.L. KING JR. WAy o 0 o v o J NI (PRIMARY STATE HWy NO (e,1p, f 1p _, I _� EXISTING 4,4y J Alit, +0 z� CO r- PRE-ZONE=CA S J ci• _' 1't,-qi y 'V 3 GOV'T PROPOSED PRE-ZONE=RM-I POB Q ' o O '� : a . FS. 137th STREET (UNIMPROVED) LOT 7 I BEACON COAL MINE ROAD VACATED ,yam (n d'�VcII '' _ 1 BY COUNTY COMMISSIONER'S JOURNAL w Z w 0 , (ORD. } =r VOLUME 29,PAGE 3 0 __ _ / [ARLINGTON z Z 4642) ..r--/ \ ADDITION >M c�cv Z& G7 2 1, �_� • /`(ORD. 1764 , Vic,cq co w w U 8 7 6 5 4 3 B.N.R.R• �p �¢�� zz / / S z 1-__ JUNCTION ADDITION //y Ac,Fi� N. �Gs � N w ., �Y i Q �_�� T® *GATT61�I , /�' °qsr Ni. �,FTo,� �Y uN i O ; i 13gth S7R I /J ` 17 .....-J-_ ?J _ l 11 i 16 v1 t` 1, 9 v' 10 ; / ` 15 •� 8 ��®IbTf W :_ ��I cz, / N T®MIA bNi®1�/(5�S Z I Z / O M `' ` ' , 12 p�'cf 14 .n� r,i 0 �� ` ' �� 1 % is 18 z W z_ 2 `�yGF 286 258 / `�0• , \` 20 �`.` U O Q co : / , 21 . w 1 - , . fn Iii `it. w %,� 23 `% �% w , `, GOV'T ° I M %% `, `. LOT 2 1 j Z I 24 \ 0 0 250 500 LEGEND: W cc O • \\ PROPOSED ZONING LINE E v W ``� z SCALE 1" = 500� (ORD. #) ORDINANCE NUMBER EC — POB POINT OF BEGINNING • `` SOUTH LINE SECTION 13�—— — — \ File: P:\SDSKPROJ\6759\SURVEY\6759EXH2.DWG Dote/Time: 06/12/2000 08:35 Scale: 1=500 Paul Xrefs: October 9,2000 Renton City Council Minutes Page 360 Utility: Utility 421 &401 Utility Systems Division requested approval to adjust the 2001 appropriations Funds, 2001 Adjusted to the Utility 421 and 401 funds and requested'approval Appropriations budget and CIP document to reflect the adjusteda isto modify the City appropriations. Based on historical CIP completion rates, increased permitting difficulty,Endangered Species Act requirements,and increased staff time dedicated to customer service,the adjusted appropriations will more accurately reflect anticipated 2001 expenditures. Refer to Utilities Committee. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Finance Committee Chair presented a report recommending Finance Committee approval of Claim Vouchers 186025- 186446, and one wire transfer totaling$2,160,512.88; and Finance: Vouchers approval of Payroll Vouchers 27985 -28229 and 527 direct deposits totaling $1,017,991.50. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR 1N THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND The following resolution was presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3470 A resolution was read designating the South County Journal as the official City Clerk: South County newspaper for publication of legal notices for the City of Renton, and Journal,Official City rescinding Resolution No.2612. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY Newspaper CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. The following ordinances were presented for second and final reading: Ordinance#4864 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 1.45 acres with Rezone:Merlino CPA#2000- access from Edmonds Ave. NE from Residential Multi-Family-Infill(RM-I) M-4 on Edmonds Ave NE and Residential-10 Dwelling Units Per Acre(R-10) to Convenience from RM-I&R-10 to CC Commercial (CC) for the Merlino CPA Rezone#2000-M-4, La Pianta/Liberty (1.45 acres) Ridge. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDNANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4865 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 20 acres with Rezone:Merlino CPA#2000- access to Edmonds Ave.NE from Residential-14 Dwelling Units Per Acre (R- M-4 on Edmonds Ave NE 14) to Residential-10 Dwelling Units Per Acre (R-10) for the Merlino CPA • from R-14 to R-10 (20 acres) Rezone #2000-M-4,La Pianta/Liberty Ridge. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON,COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4866 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of 8.47 acres with Rezone: Merlino CPA#2000- access from Empire Way S./SR-900 from Commercial Office(CO)to M-6 on Empire Way S/SR-900 Residential Multi-Family-Infill (RM-I) for the Merlino CPA Rezone #2000-M- from CO to RM-I 6. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDNANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance#4867 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of approximately 7.5 Rezone:Aegis CPA#2000-M- acres located south of NE 3rd St.between Edmonds and Monroe Avenues NE 5 on NE 3rd St from R-10 to from Residential-10 Dwelling Units Per Acre(R-10) to Light Industrial (IL) for IL the Aegis CPA Rezone#2000-M-5. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY CLAWSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. \ I Marilyn Petersen - project number LUA-99 " ECF, R Page 1 ttj From: <Maribroida©cs.com> L To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/27/00 5:36PM, loci/0/ Subject: project numb CrLUAg9i78F , R Dear Renton City Council: To protect the endangered Black River blue heron colony, please do NOT rezone the hillside nearby. This would be a great disservice to the environment and our children. Thank you. Marian Broida maribroida©cs.com : LAtkeril< C�) 0 l/-�C�t. .p►tJl ( tik �rr✓ ��'1�f�4-�iir.� Marilyn Peter den-Merlino Comprehensive Rezone___ „y..__ Page 1 p \ From: "Nancy Thomson" <nit@scn.org> To: <mpetersen@ci.renton.wa.us> ��///""" Date: 5/8/00 11:44AM Subject: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Rezone May 6, 2000 Renton City Council Members 1055 South Grady Way • Renton, Wa 98055 Attn: Councilman T. Schlitzer UA-99-178, E , R Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone • On May 3rd, 2000 I attended a Planning Commission Public Hearing regarding the Merlino Rezone and was very pleased to see so many people concerned and willing to stand up and speak out on behalf of the Herons. We are a community that is aware and a community that cares about the quality of life for its citizens and its environment. I am submitting this letter to urge the Renton City Council to vote NO on the Merlino REZONE. Regarding the Merlino Comprehensive Plan Rezone, I understand why the owner is pushing for the more lucrative"Multi-family" rezone; the rights of private ownership and human greed dictate that it is the only natural course of action for the owner. I believe, however, that the City Council and the Planning Commission MUST be driven by a completely different set of criteria. The Council MUST place the greater good above corporate greed and a healthy environment above private ownership. Years of hard work by a group of dedicated volunteers and the investment by the City itself of time, money and resources have made the Black River Wetlands a cherished and important part of the community. It would be unthinkable to now watch the City sabotage its own efforts to protect and enhance this environmentally significant area. Lets continue to work TOGETHER to protect and preserve the Black River Riparian Forest. It is a rare jewel in a city that is overdeveloped and under appreciated. I beg the City of Renton and challenge this government to act with great compassion and courage and to stand up and do the right thing for the citizens of this community and most importantly for future generations. I urge you to take your children and your grandchildren and go walk the quiet and peaceful road along the Black River. Walk with the herons and really take the time to listen and see what an amazing gift the City of Renton has been given. It is a small road, not heavily traveled and yet one of magnificent beauty. As you walk ask yourself, If I have the courage and foresight to vote NO on this REZONE will there be other opportunities to build multi-family housing? Yes. Are there less environmentally sensitive areas where this type of building would be more appropriate?Absolutely. But if I vote yes on this rezone will we be able to relocate this wetland, and will these beautiful birds be able to find a new home or will they be pushed into oblivion and ultimately extinction? It is never easy to take stand, to face a challenge head on and to find the courage necessary to vote for the greater good and not the lesser. I beg the City Council to walk this road less traveled. Please make a difference in our community and VOTE NO on the REZONE. "I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I -- I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference." Robert Frost � �� |'�o � -� - ---''---- -------' — --�'-- ------- - ---------�2� MarilvFi zone Page - — -~'---� - ------------'----�-'-------- r-'---- — ' Nancy Thomson 1250U -SE100UhStreet Renton, VVA8O050 425-255'0733 � RECEIVED Suzanne Krom, President Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation CITY OF RENTON 4715 1/2-36th Avenue SW APR 2 Q 2000 Seattle,WA 98126-2715 APR 2 0 2000 RENTON CITY COUNCIL April 19,2000 RECEIVED CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Larry Brosman,Chair, Renton Planning Commission (fax: 425-430-7300) City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Subject: Comments re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone, project LUA-99-178-ECF,R Dear Mr. Brosman, First,I want to thank Mr. Rob Jenkins, Senior Planner for this proposed action, for giving me until today to send my comments to you regarding the proposed rezone and amendment change. The other signers of this letter and I were not Parties of Record for this proposed action. In the future, please always include us as Parties of Record for any proposed action in or near the Black River site. I am president of Citizens For Renton Wildlands Preservation, a 350-member organization involved with the preservation of the Black River Riparian Forest since 1989. The Seattle Audubon Society and Rainier Audubon Society should also have been Parties of Record for this proposed amendment/rezone. Seattle Audubon Society represents over 5,300 members, including Renton residents, and Rainier Audubon Society represents over 1,400 South King County residents. We have consistently been involved in the public process and have requested in the past to be Parties of Record for this geographical area. Please add us to your permanent Party of Record list for any future proposed action in or near the Black River site. The hillside overlooking the Black River Riparian Forest is an integral part of the protected open space below.The Black River site is of regional significance and value, and the hillside abutting the open space provides important habitat that contributes significantly to the rich diversity of life that exists on the Black River site. In addition, it has a profound effect on the waterflow and water quality on the Black River site, including the wetlands, P1 Pond,and Springbrook Creek, as well as the Green/Duwamish River,which is less than one-quarter mile downstream. The pond,creek, and river are home to the Threatened Chinook salmon, as well as Coho salmon and Cutthroat trout. We are extremely concerned that the proposed rezone will result in a development that will significantly alter the habitat of the Black River area and feel strongly that the Renton Planning Commission and Renton City Council should recommend denial of the rezone. We urge you to reconsider your original SEPA determination of DNS,changing it to a DS, and address these issues through an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement). It is incorrect to conclude that the proposed rezone,in anticipation of building 250-482 apartment units,will have a less than moderate impact on the environment. The Staff Report fails to consider the environmental impacts of the proposed amendment/rezone,and subsequent development of 250-482 apartment units. The clearing of the hillside, anticipated development of the apartment complex(es),and inevitable introduction of 445-858 new residents has a strong likelihood of significantly degrading the habitat for the Great Blue Heron colony located immediately below,as well as the Chinook and Coho salmon habitat in Springbrook Creek, P1 Pond, and the Green/Duwamish River,which is fed in part by water coming off the subject property. The Black River heron colony is one of largest heron colonies,indeed perhaps t largest colony,in the Puget Sound region. Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 Any one of the following concerns in this letter should warrant a DS (Determination of Significance) and thus an EIS. The list of concerns in this letter taken in their entirety should warrant denial of the proposed rezone. The EIS should require environmental studies of the impacts of the proposed rezone and subsequent anticipated development.The EIS cited in the Environmental Checklist for this proposed rezone, dated January 31, 2000, applies to the Black River Riparian Forest--the habitat on the hillside is very different from the Black River Riparian Forest area. The information in that EIS is not applicable to this hillside,which consists of native vegetation,wetlands, streams, and steep slopes. Overview(Please see the pages 4-6 for details): a. Habitat: The habitat on this hillside is unusually rich and pristine,which renders it unique to this urban setting.The Environmental Checklist is incomplete,leaving out all significant species of animals and plants. It incorrectly states that no threatened or endangered species are onsite.It incorrectly states "Unknown"in response to this question on the checklist. b. Open Space and Greenbelt: How will the City mitigate for the loss of the 75% open space requirement on the diversity of habitat on this hillside and the Black River Riperian Forest? Removing the Greenbelt designation from this site represents a significant environmental impact to this site and to the Black River habitat below, as it relates to Open Space. c. Human Impacts: A significant adverse environmental impact will result from the human impacts of multi-family dwellings in this habitat and the Black River Riparian Forest. d Alternative Nesting Habitat: The hillside habitat may provide alternative Great Blue Heron nesting habitat in the future. e. Hydrology: The proposed rezone and subsequent development would have a significant adverse impact on the hydrology of the hillside and lower, affected area(the Black River site). Development of the hillside would result in an increase of impervious surface on the hillside, resulting in greater fluctuation of water levels during storm events and a reduction in water retention in the hillside. f. Wetlands: The subject property clearly intersects the eastern wetland according to the City's own Property Map Exhibit,dated December 14,.1999 (according to the Environmental Checklist, "it is difficult to tell from those maps whether any of the wetland actually lies on the subject property." [stated repeatedly, including pages 4, 6, 11]). At least one other wetland exists onsite that is apparent from SR 900, and should be delineated. g. Streams: Clarify the status of streams on the proposed site. h. National Marine Fisheries Service 4-D Rules: The rezone should take into account the proposed 4-D Rules from the National Marine Fisheries Service concerning a"take" of Chinook salmon. i. Slope and Soils Instability: The hillside consists of steep slopes and unstable soils. Removing the Greenbelt designation from this site represents a significant environmental impact to this site and to the Black River habitat below, as it relates to slope instability. 2 Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 The Environmental Checklist states"Unknown"in response to the question, "Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?"It is not clear how this response was obtained since this contradicts King County's designation as "Slide Sensitive." Prior to approval of the rezone, environmental impact studies regarding erosion should be conducted. j. Traffic Impacts: The impacts of traffic were inadequate to warrant a DNS. Why is the City allowing the developer to base their traffic and other analyses on the minimum density allowed under the RE-1 Zoning (10 DUA)instead of requiring them to use the maximum? k. Protection of Remaining Pristine Habitat: Studies should be conducted to evaluate how the City will ensure that remaining habitat will continue to flourish and not evolve into a plant community dominated by invasive vegetation. Please see pages 4-6 for details about each of these concerns. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this proposed rezone. Our organizations feel strongly about the protection of this area and have been advocating for its protection of many years. Sincerely, Chuck Lennox, Conservation Chair Bruce Harpham, Conservation Chair Seattle Audubon Society Rainier Audubon Society 8050- 35th Ave. NE, Seattle,WA 98115 P.O. Box 778, Auburn, WA 98071 206-523-4483 ext: 13 253-939-6411 Suzanne Krom,President Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation 4715 1/2 -36th Ave. SW, Seattle,WA 98126 206-933-0222 cc: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler,Chair,Renton Planning and Development Committee Randy Corman,President,Renton City Council Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner,City of Renton Rob Jenkins, Senior Planner,City of Renton 3 Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 Details of Overview on pages 2 and 3: a. HABITAT: The habitat on this hillside is unusually rich and pristine, which renders it unique to this urban setting. It consists of old-growth bigleaf maple (with well over 25 trees larger than 100 cm DBH),conifer snags, and a rich understory.The Environmental Checklist is far from complete,leaving out all significant species of animals and plants. For example, (plants) old- growth bigleaf maple, snowberry,Indian plum,skunk cabbage (an important indicator of wetlands), and (animals) many species of hawks, including Red-Tailed, Sharp-Shinned, and Cooper's, and other birds and other animals, including American Kestrel, Great Blue Heron, Green Heron,Bald Eagle,Pileated Woodpecker,Great-Horned Owl,neotropical-tropical migratory birds (including warblers, orioles, and thrushes), red fox, river otter, weasels,Pacific shrew,white-tailed deer, Chinook and Coho salmon,Cutthroat Trout, Pacific treefrog, garter snake, and Northern alligator lizard all exist on and near this subject property. The checklist incorrectly states that no threatened or endangered species are onsite. On the contrary,the Bald Eagle is still officially listed by the Federal government as Threatened, and the Pileated Woodpecker is a King County and State of Washington Species of Concern, and both exist on and nearby this subject property.Pileated Woodpecker and Great-Horned Owl are known to nest in this area. This is part of a migration route. The checklist incorrectly states "Unknown"in response to this question on the checklist. b. OPEN SPACE AND GREENBELT: How will the City mitigate for the loss of the 75% open space requirement on the diversity of habitat on this hillside and the Black River Riperian Forest?There is simply no way to mitigate for the loss of pristine old-growth habitat that includes mature bigleaf maples, and established snowberry and Indian plum habitat. This is glorious wildlife habitat that has taken hundreds of years to become established and mature. Not only does the elimination of this habitat represent a significant adverse impact to the hillside, but also to the Black River Riparian Forest,as the current habitat significantly enhances the overall diversity of the Great Blue Heron habitat. Any loss of habitat on this hillside should require mitigation by improving the habitat on Tract C to original conditions using such measures as reforesting with native trees,shrubs, and replacing the artificial fill that's been dumped on the site by the developer. Removing the Greenbelt designation from this site represents a significant environmental impact to this site and to the Black River habitat below, as it relates to Open Space. This also relates to slope instability and is therefore included in section i,below. c. HUMAN IMPACTS: A significant adverse environmental impact will result from the human impacts of multi-family dwellings in this habitat and the Black River Riparian Forest.The development would introduce between 445-858 new residents (250-482 apartment units) to the hillside/Black River area,creating social trails into any remaining habitat. EIS studies should include documenting potential impacts of humans and their domestic pets. d. ALTERNATIVE NESTING HABITAT: The hillside habitat may provide alternative Great Blue Heron nesting habitat in the future. e. HYDROLOGY: The proposed rezone and subsequent development would have a significant adverse impact on the hydrology of the hillside and lower, affected area(the Black River site). In this highly environmentally sensitive area,there should be No Change from the current, predeveloped hydrology of the hillside. The EIS should describe how the stormwater from any project will be controlled to maintain the current water quality, volume, and rate that flows down 4 ' I Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 the hillside.There will be significant impacts to the Black River site if the water from the several wetlands and streams running off of the hillside is diverted or altered. Mitigation measures should be required to ensure that any development does not alter the habitat below. The water that flows down this hillside from the streams and wetlands feeds into the wetlands on Tract C,the P1 Pond, Springbrook Creek, and the Green/Duwamish River. Development of the hillside would likely result in the wetland on Tract C becoming a seasonal wetland,thus significantly altering the overall habitat. Development of the hillside would result in an increase of impervious surface on the hillside, resulting in greater fluctuation of water levels during storm events and a reduction in water retention in the hillside.Toxic materials from automobiles and other vehicles,and residential/commercial use of pesticides will also likely impact the wetland in Black River unless an excellent stormwater system is installed.Water retention by the hillside during storms not only dampens the storm water peaks that are injurious to amphibians spawning in the Black River wetlands,but also retains water through the summer. f. WETLANDS: The subject property clearly intersects the eastern wetland according to the City's own Property Map Exhibit,dated December 14, 1999 (according to the Environmental Checklist, "it is difficult to tell from those maps whether any of the wetland actually lies on the subject property." [stated repeatedly, including pages 4, 6, 11]). At least one other wetland exists onsite that is apparent from SR 900, and should be delineated. g. STREAMS: Clarify the status of streams on the proposed site. Due to the presence of several culverted locations on SR 900, this indicates potential streams on the site. Maximum buffering should be applied to the streams and wetlands onsite and the buffering should not be averaged;it should be a constant,consistent buffer protecting the streams and wetlands. According to the City of Renton's Environmental Regulations,any alteration of streams is prohibited: Section 4.3.090, items 16c i and ii: Prohibited Stream Alteration.The Environmental Checklist does not call them "streams."This needs to be professionally and independently assessed. They are indeed potentially streams. The terminology in the Checklist appears to be an effort to avoid following the regulations. h. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE 4-D RULES: The rezone should take into account the proposed 4-D Rules from the National Marine Fisheries Service concerning a "take" of Chinook salmon. i.' SLOPE AND SOILS INSTABILITY: The hillside consists of unstable soils. According to the Environmental Checklist, "Nearly all of the subject property is mapped 'King County Hazard" on the City's `Slide Sensitive Areas' map.The extreme east end of the site is mapped either `High' or 'Very High' on that map."Also, "The portion of the site lying south and east of the unimproved S. 140th Street right-of-way is mapped as `Erosion Hazard'." Removing the Greenbelt designation from this site represents a significant environmental impact to this site and to the Black River habitat below, as it relates to slope instability. This concern also relates to Greenbelt impacts and is therefore included in section b, above. In response to question#ld, Section B (Environmental Elements)in the Environmental Checklist (page 5),"Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?If so, describe." "Unknown."is the response in the Environmental Checklist. It is not clear how this response was obtained since this contradicts King County's designation as Slide Sensitive. Prior to approval of the rezone,environmental impact studies regarding erosion should be 5 Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 conducted. As per the Environmental Checklist,"Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction,or use?If so, generally describe."Response: "N/A. No development is currently proposed."The potential impacts of erosion should be studied before any project plan is submitted.This proposed rezone seems to be an ideal time to require this. j. TRAFFIC IMPACTS: The impacts of traffic will be substantial, meaning that the DNS is inadequate.Why is the City allowing the developer to base their traffic and other analyses on the minimum density allowed under the RE-1 Zoning (10 DUA)instead of requiring them to use the maximum?The numbers should be revised upward to accurately reflect the actual traffic and other impacts. k. PROTECTION OF REMAINING PRISTINE HABITAT: Studies should be conducted to evaluate how the City will ensure that remaining habitat will continue to flourish and not evolve into a plant community dominated by invasive vegetation. SYNOPSIS With these issues, we strongly feel that the rezone should not be approved.This is a very special area. Impacts from multifamily development would be so severe that mitigation is just not possible on this site. Any development on this hillside should follow prescribed guidelines for Critical Areas: First and foremost: Avoid damage. Second: Minimize damage. Last Resort: Mitigate for damage only if no other options are available. Any proposed action on this hillside should require studies evaluating all potential environmental impacts,including but not limited to those addressed in this letter. e.' G 6 v ` April 22, 2000 CITY OF RENTON Planning Commission APR 2 4 2000 City of Renton RECEIVED1055 S. Grady Way CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Merlin Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone(LUA-99-178,ECF, R) Commission Members: I'm writing to you on behalf of the Friends of the Black River. We are a group of local residents who share a common interest in the Black River Heron Colony and the Black River Riparian Forest. We do not oppose the rezone of the Merlino SR-900 property to RM-I,provided that the owner develops it in a manner similar to that shown on his Site Plan Concept Study(see Exhibit A). The concept study is not binding however, and we are concerned that once the property is rezoned the owner may decide to develop the property in a more intensive manner than that shown on the concept study. We request that the Planning Commission require the owner to submit a binding site plan for public review and comment prior to receiving the Commission's approval for the rezone. In lieu of a binding site plan we would support a conditioned rezone, provided that the rezone is conditioned as follows: 1. A maximum density allowance of 10 dwelling units per acre. We will support the owner if he submits a variance request for a density of less than 10 dwelling units per acre. 2. A minimum 300-foot buffer requirement between the category 1 wetland located at the southeast corner of the property and all development (see Exhibit B). 3. A minimum 100-foot buffer requirement between the seasonal stream located on the east end of the property and all development(see Exhibit B). 4. A minimum 100-foot buffer requirement between the Burlington Northern railroad right of way along the southern property line and all development. Storm water treatment and detention facilities may be located in this buffer(see Exhibit B). 5. A requirement that the owner construct an open pond storm water detention system instead of a closed vault system. An open pond system planted with native plants provides wildlife habitat value. A closed vault system provides no wildlife habitat value. These conditions will allow the owner to build a development similar to the one that he shows on his Site Plan Concept Study. If during the course of design of the project the owner fmds that he cannot meet a condition,the condition can be changed by City Council. This will allow flexibility in the application of the conditions and allow for public input if a condition needs to be changed. We feel that these conditions do not place an undue burden on the owner because he has already indicated to the City that he plans to develop his property in this manner. We provide the following information to support our request: e e (9 Environmental Qualities of the Merlin SR-900 property: • Only the Burlington Northern railroad right of way separates the Merlino property from the City of Renton's protected Black River Riparian Forest. The Black River Riparian Forest houses the Black River Heron Colony, which is the largest heron colony in King County. • Even though the Merl no property is located several hundred yards from the Black River Heron Colony,development on the property will be located at the same elevation as the colony,providing a clear line of sight between the development and the colony. Activity on the Merlino property will impact the Black River Heron Colony. • The Merlino property lies adjacent to, and may even contain a portion of, a high quality wetland in which the Black River heron forage. This wetland is one of only three known foraging areas located near the Black River heron colony. These foraging areas are critical for the nesting heron. This wetland is located at the southeast corner of the property. • Besides the Great Blue Heron,the Merlino property provides good habitat for Bald Eagles, Red Tailed Hawk and Pileated Woodpecker. These species have been observed on or near the property. The Pileated Woodpecker is listed by the State of Washington as a species of concern. The Bald Eagle is listed by the Federal Government as threatened. All four species are identified by King County as species of local significance. • In addition to the species listed above, Black Tailed Deer, coyote, owl,red fox and numerous other mammals,birds and reptiles utilize the property and move between the property and the Black River Riparian Forest. When this property is developed,we expect to see degradation in the capacity of the Black River Riparian Forest to support wildlife. Rebuttal to City of Renton Planning Staff justification for not requiring a binding site plan or conditioned rezone: In the staff report to the Planning Commission, City staff claim that the City's site plan review and critical areas regulations can be used to ensure that any development on the site,"Minimizes disturbances to geologically hazardous,wooded slopes.""Provides adequate buffering of the proposed development from the blue heron rookery...." "Minimizes the visual scale of the residential development...." We believe that the City cannot require a low impact development, like the one currently shown on the owner's Site Plan Concept Study,through site plan review and application of critical areas regulations. We have the following concerns: • City staff admit that RM-I zoning of this property will allow for the development of up to 482 multi-family units on the property. • Sensitive areas regulations prohibit development on slopes greater than 40%. This regulation applies to only 1.89 acres out of a total of 26.01 acres for this property. • Sensitive areas regulations require only a 100-foot buffer for category 1 wetlands. The owner's Site Plan Concept Study shows a much greater buffer between the category 1 wetland located at the southeast corner of the property and his development(see Exhibit B). • Sensitive areas regulations require only a 25-foot setback from seasonal streams, such as the ' one located on the east end of the property. The owner's Site Plan Concept Study shows a much greater buffer between the seasonal stream and his development(see exhibit B). • Sensitive areas regulations do not regulate setbacks from railroad right of ways. The owner's Site Plan Concept Study shows a significant setback from the Burlington Northern railroad right of way(see exhibit B). • We believe that the site plan review process cannot be applied to considerably limit the density of a development. City staff imply that it can in this case. We believe that they are wrong. Development density is controlled through zoning policy,not site plan review. Conclusion: The owner of the Merlin SR-900 property has submitted a Site Plan Concept Study for a multi- family development on the property. The concept study shows a low impact multi-family development of 200 units. The study shows considerable buffers between the development and • the category 1 wetland(located at the southeast corner of the property), seasonal stream(located on the eastern portion of the property)and southern property line. We do not oppose a development of this nature,however we are concerned that a rezone may be allowed based on the owner's non-binding intention to build this development. The owner may then change his proposal once the rezone is granted. We ask the Planning Commission to consider this possibility and act accordingly. The Merlin property contains numerous wildlife habitat functions that are worth preserving. In addition,the property is located near the Black River Riparian Forest and development of this property will impact the wildlife habitat functions of the riparian forest including the function of the Black River Heron Colony. We ask the Planning Commission to take into account these impacts. City staff claim that sensitive areas regulations and site plan review can be used to considerably limit the scale of development on the Merlino property. We disagree. We request that the Planning Commission not approve the rezone of the Merlin SR-900 property unless: 1. The owner of the property submits a legally binding site plan to Planning Commission for public review and comment;or 2. The Planning Commission conditions the rezone as we have identified above. If you have any questions or concerns regarding our request,please contact me at 425-277-8219 and I will gladly discuss this issue with you. We plan to attend the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for May 3, 2000. Sincerely Tom Malphrus Friends of the Black River home phone: 425-277-8219 18713 102nd Ave. SE work phone: 425-430-7313 Renton,WA 98055 e-mail: • tomnyari@aol.com cc:Renton City Council • ‘ 0. E x H I SI 1 _ A • . • • •6 cr - to a eO ( I:t . :. -al 5•.)..17)fel IC-%4\1 R. R ealtip n ?to.YN rwtc, sto.-C tAl -tlAe. o w rte.%r c. • ,..) a..c. t-he. AA 0...r k,z no S rz -goo • . . yr ... ^-••••••...1 I co . ......„. • -01 .....„. at ••.,....s...n.., I • . , ...N. CO „.....--• -••\\ \ .0..0 ......._,,„.„...... ei •••••••••••'' r••••''"' CO '' ...,.. • ..... U•0 •••••,,,,r.s.,,,,.,......,, . C•I•o.arvdf4•t . ..:.:.:.:.•.;..?--:--•..7•.•=x4";:•-:'11•;%:::'..;.-.•.1.:...7,..:.::.:.,:-7..-;'..•i 1',•;,,-1.-.-1.:,".;,.1...:..:.5..,,.•.•%.,••i.,.:......r,:...•).`...%.....1;...•.,.,..•,.••;-:.-:....-...••"-.:•..:....•...•.i.-•.!,1,•.,"•,.4-•;7..f's..•.•.•••...-•.:-.:.._.-'•,..•,..•..;'Z-"s-:.•.•.••m.s•.r•-•.-e.......a...d..",.-...'......."..-..--_.-.."_,—.,...,:...'•.*'-.--.....-.':•.L.—"..'.•".•".•'•).'..•.•.",:,*,.,".,_•;,.,.:..•,d,.,,.„..,..."..:,•',•-••'—••_.••_.--z•-•._"4.•.F'--•"•_.,-7•/.T"•4'•./•.:,::.:-•:2f.5.'.•.1.•'1;'r'.-,•.\••‘•' •••.,..- r a..(/'.-;,.y 1:',=r,'.'••%,.'F":-,..1;".%:...1..1.-.,........„74.2,..„s•..1S.3:.••.•:••:•:..::.:.:t. ...... ..;a...t`4••...-:...•.-.';..•:.,:• '.!..-.)• -"::.:•.*:t.:.:"::;4:•':' ".....%6•.,4..•ft:.,•':..,.:„`.-\'\...‘.,,,._...„.,.,.._•.•:.•‘:••:.:•.*•.••-•..••.•,.."s••,•-•.., ......,.,.... ...e.'1/41.....•...‘%.•%. ) 1). 01 ••:.•.S.•-••••.••••••• •-.....n....=•..., ..,..,,Z••'••••"-" -...s.•••• ',,o," ;• .....•••••.... \.,:-...--••';.:'•-:,•- • - • ',.....,,, . -••••_, •-••••••• f-' . •.4..„‘..,..•,,,‘‘,`„„.•••,,.. s'..."•••ma ' •":•-• // . 1.3 ...../A \\•••7;'-':•:' ‘1.0-..„ss•:.-:::: ::::*:•••‘‘‘‘`',..... sNi's-%%%.`s"...,.._ ...,..., ., . ••••••----..,,,,---•• . - ! ''... • /------'...,.....1,1;,,....7". .f ' ..... ,..---‘.,. ..%--,.........• ..... .. 1...-;,'.'/••-•'" --• A • .....• ..... .... •.. . -.....,;,.-.. --,,, .0 -‘•.„..../ '`-• -.....'''''s •.....k.,',..4:icUpt• • .. * iiiiii--••••• '., ) '',',•::.......... ;"'•--.•'‘`••••••..'''''',.‘1%.,i_,'iv..C•A C /•••,,./r#, •- ........s L.-••••••,- --. i.-•:"7--i-t.--;-- 1;0 I A..„&?-.. , . 6 •01.1610,Opt gf•-i''.-.';-..... ."• ss••••• s,%ss-.\•••:,;• -' s...% 0 ,•,..1... .,„/,..,_.. . .....••-• 1044 riii II f 1:it le "r:' „,. 4.,ok,..Aa_. xj. / /kW/Slip''''.'...\i'..-.. ‘.• 7....,..:‘,‘%.... NN.:.7.%.,..,. • I- /'/ ..' .'..."' • '........i ••••••":. •II -47 , -•• ••,•••••,%•-•,%••.... .1/4•_ \ •.- •/,.1/. • • 1 • •• •.., •••-.... a, -‘,.,....... „ -.... -1 z_Z.,.."-„Lc."•"^ ..,.......... .i ___....1:i,,,,,f I.,ja •...,,,.a,IllNitt. -.or , 1111111.,,_.., a, .."-1.• •'' 4...., _,-.....,A7cTforibik V, - ,,,,' .... ,. --Nit, ma . 7•••-- s',..ttiv-•, ••-•,;.•••••-•....) •ZZ‘'..\NN .,„,-•..,„ /-"„,- .. ,• 1 .• . ,; •- _:-.-,-.., 91;_.14.‘ J...., N.A.....\„,...\"...., . Z.::,......i.4..... ............ ............%. .-:-...., -. ....z..\ ,,,, „••...,, ',..,, _____•,•••••-v,';... .-A.-6,•••,' 01111”'.____,Lillegt •••••/' •••-• ......c':-..‘..•••, .4.• '• .4a, . 'ill.R. "'""s, ••••••• ......• ••p% •V,•. ••••\ 4••. . \ •••,‘• ::"...9',,' .,,g. Will i tr 4111.1111015 err%. • „.•••1 '' .----",..,,,./ -:N..\ v,/,_ \,%-• Po,„,-.4.,,, %, . • . ..,... .- , ..,...., . N. N.._..../. .N, % ••••.,,_ .. .......%...,.7..... %. \. . it .,,•-:,.,'e:..:.... .• • .- 31.911111!.,Iiii 110.:err ._„,•••• .,.1..„.„. , ..•: ...,.s-••••• is.,s:.'‘.0 ..••„••••___...,„J...\..N., ••••. bi,Flip.;,;:7 `"%••„ •" . - ••••. ,.... %., `... • 4,,,•,••• ;.• gi.i6i' -„..• • ,.. ' s."• ‘‘N *k:Z.4%.....1,• " ..4„.• " /....% •••••' %.".... . *.•. \".. ''''.• •••:"..4.7:: •••••if 0 111144 NEL, '."•.....,‘‘ N.:..\;•,;•Zs....•%1••/-7.7.7„.. ........• •-.. -," - • - .4 ..• / /... •••... , ...•.'' ....." ---.. , 4104•04)10114 ...'.. V / /••:::••••• a-'''''.. %•-•.1."‘ •.'"'"• ''s '........11 1 i II i)hide • 1-.WINN '• s••••• ••..‘‘ .SV• - • .. .•••••-r-" . ..,--...;-..... .I.,Pfii 101 ; . -- ,••- ,,-,..., „:„‘A• ,, /' ,,be,,,,':•.••••••.... .t...:;._...,-•%.. k...„,•,r,., .."., i i. . -.,--4•4 Ran *iv ••.s. •••...,_ .N..Z.•Nis...• „ ..V. ..••••'. ,,.,,,...,.. •7.'i:-41.--'-"-'.4;--- . • • ' '''' O•a#\Wilir .' /.., . - . •-, "..., '•• -, •ss % I -1/4, •• ..., - ...7..•-•'I. % .••••••..,••••-. ,, %, •••„ ‘ • . • ‘, t •• ,,, % % `••,._ ..4-0, •:\ N.-% CO 0".,p•"., - .... -...Illgittairsi i .••• A•••P ‘ ..' •.jai*,..'%%••1•• • , •: 1 .3.... .'cri ,A .• ••....."'..i s•-•••,, • .s' -. .,..• '''.-'. ifitn°1111 '" . • ' - • -••• .' .••••. •• • i . s • • •• -• xi" i 's.N.....-A-••••-•..."""•••••• .. '•-..u.s. ... *.ti' -„ A.V.. • co / ...•••••• •••••........,.....„ • • •t.... .... • opriala p 1:4 - .• 's• - ..... .........., .. .....,..,..,:•.,•••.7' 3V\ \ -s . .\. • ... ............• .. % a. ** ,,,, "s. ** % t 1.. •"'•..............,..... ,f 1 \ \ ' • •' /••''7 y...4...*:""-•••••• • ••• 411,.. , . ./ i '-............," st•s. s•••••••-" i s \`•\'‘ \,.••• \N‘\ .v.'• i 1 or •••'''. .• % ' ••` 1. ‘a '•\ •• • • '7.71 .; •- -••1:' ' f• //-rA".-••••-'r -.-- . r ... . .... .... ,, . , ... . , .... i , ..,, ,.... , ......... ......, ....,_• ., .... .........., „N • \ t N \ -* ais; polirliirm •-•" •%. r ( ( '. ' N ' 4 k`t ., ••-• .•• • •••- •. - —..7=1-:•••• •••••■14t-:-..‘•• •. \ • \ •• .' . . - - • `1 I , • • • '''' • ?.., •%." „•''''• '' • .••,".*•••••-••••••-...........•••••• A., _,•-......•••:1,..-......, .„....ael-• , '...%-"'''4,•4• '-i••••• %. %••• \,\ .„ N. ,,• • • _.:..., •••••'TZ-.,::",;-.....--...4".- - .....-;,.g..•••;..'. 4.--•-•...-........,4.......,,...../sti.......,•••;•••ka, .. .. \ •,, •.,,,, .....„..." ,...... -I 1 V-\• \\*. .s••\ \ \ • ./- •..... Vt...":„:....:% •t ..,. '- ••••-•'-''' .1• \‘ •\ \ N. '‘ • ‘•-• .\N/ / _ d - - .,„,„....^:...... 14-1-1-1-4-4-/-*-9-1-4-4, '"•-••-• 1. t••••• •‘. • %., . . .s. i. 1..••• \ N [ ..‘ .... \ ." i esT •..' .--- ...., ,, - '•.••;••':•j•\.:`-'4•••,,.. • ‘....-""•• . ,.,..-/'. ( ,-: *1/4 t. \ %. i \ .\•••, „ • .:\ .0 -' '-.;-•.41-•••••:SS.:...'•• p••"•" il • I ."" ` % ' i - .t. •, \, ...' 't la •• 47.:' • •,..„41.!..,10 ••••••••.;:s.2* " fe 1, •-..., 1. s. •1.,•, -. t • • ''':.l,11• L "--e7 rt';'447•• ili' •,.;,,•:,:•••••s,..-,..,.....„,- ....- •Ls ; ,.. \ \1. -.,....%•• , , '... ,..„.•,, a .•-•" ,....1 -••ii" ..1.4ife4...:A5\1... .. -1•,_......,.f;r. . i..‘...... 1 ••• ..,. .4..........‘...N. ••.. •-.1,1•:-.1., .I, 1 1 •- • ••••i .1/4: ...--. • -'""w•-••01,k1W.1;,•,••••../,'I ', \‘,..-.1,•• •''•-••••••• ....\,s.1%,...:...:•;:•••=.11 k.' •-4 ..• • ''44P.%'•44.:%44.i.‘..,.. .•••s • \\\..,•••••••.:•••:. ,••••••• ....•::::::•:4s•?\....•to''. 10 1 ... *4*-::::.::::.',t:r.;.ils 31: "...i;.:.'......::::::....:::::::$••••1/":•.:.:••%:. . E - •••N_..‹...z.Z:..z.,...4 ilikz;:p..V:i.:•-1•:.7,:r..-.::.:•:•••••••••:•••/'..-s‘•ks.•%5.- . ."......2.2.;••••4;%.:Z .Z•Zz::::,•_:•:.,:„.....'••:•%•://n %,., I • . IN,':%"2".., .... ••••...:.‘...-"iss•••..Z......•:'...1'....,;••••.`1..”s•••• •IT . : ''''''''.7:-.7.4•41.,,. •••••.:................;e•••s.%••10 I • •••,s::,,... •••1.....Z."••• •••:;i:s'N • . ••• is‘ ...•,-.....,•T.u..., 1,...4,-.."•••,•%,..%N. / -••. • ..1"7...••• V..4.- •.4) •• • s''s , 3 1 . •;I••• / s'‘. ‘ • ••'•, CL • • • • •."N4 ... 's,.. •.......s"•••.' •1 7' • /••• : I, /;:-..••: I I J1. • • • Ft.AN CONCEPT 5TUDY /• , „1 ) 1 c ecdtt ritste`l i ...\-•,..:... 0/1 '411 f„•31 a. BSI WI SI 7•10 s .1 .',...•' • '1 . . . • •.) N. F_ Y 11- ii il-- a, • . . rf. • • . 4 O. 1•••0 Ce:t.i 0 A 0..c CeCk90 c/ •1 14) --1--laA0‘ ( be ro n •CorH4Si in ' 0 A) 0.:\cit. se-cki:-,0 n a\ 5-1-r c-ct 0\ • . . 1• • ....,,_ ON . ........._ • . ‘....,........ 1 CO .....„ 1 C4 .........,.........o..." '...--....n"s••••••••••• . • -•••,,,\ CO •••••••,.. .. , . . . tn , --• ........, . . isa .„,......„,....,.--• _. "----- -•••-.1----.............. ...• ,„,• %----..., ••••••.,..,‘%... ,•• ,I .,••••••••• ... ' • ,....•-•• r .. • .*,***::..7.•.V... •••••4''t••;:•,••••••...• ••1 •••••••••,.. ‘.,g...(i...:•••:...:;";•. .5...i:•‘::;:i":•:•:1!.....:...7,4”."-L.:::. ••Q.;.i', 6 4•••••••••::.4.,:4,....Z:•:•,• 4.5.31Q Tr. ...S.7...4....,. ... 1....., ) ar I -•,• r - .- -...-/ X••-,zr.bL-...• ' -"... --''''''-------=:--;-,..44•••- •-' '• "' • .... '•••••••••-..-1.4.74.1.•:::::•:;•••;::-%1:;;;?:-?:::•:::::-.:::,-1- :. :z.,..1..••••••..rr.r..-ar........:.. ., ,,,..... ,--..... ., ,L""*• •r;Fr"::iz......".•:: ::•,,,.„-:;•::,....r..-,:: .,, . •••••...,_ '.1/41.4.....s."-.N. . d -,-.1--..rt-:-.•-•."47,-;.••:" ;-*•••.:-.. ..... .-• • •Ne-e-------:: -------... :!•.::-,•::•"'-7"••••••• ,...„,,, /I 4....,••••1...,•.• 4.•••1•••;;;•••-" r •••••••--••••:.17---::•••-••••••••;::- ••• ,.•••.,..,..s• .‘" .. 1•••••••••••••••7-4 -.** *. ••••:•:••''•:•••••-•*" ‘N•'•••• C*1 •-•-•••?"-.'.:::•••.•te...41:::•••••••::.^...•,*."" 1"••-•••••••••••••• --•-.„.•••••4.0•••• 40 4. ....4,.., ••••••••,... 4,....., ,••• / - ••-• -""•••••44.7 \...N.•?`- •-•••••-...744k.s, .1 .....••• ....-...s....,_ // ,••••• r ...--nr••••........% ---‘•• •• - •-•.,••4 ..• 11 ..:4.....-..,....... .. ...........:4,..4.444......_......,„....... . 4....,,••:• I",••• '•, •._.................4r1 ...,.... ...../r/C.N\\:\\•••••04c.-•••;:;...... %,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,, s'*‘'..%,,,‘..,.. +--ri."••••• -•..' '• •• •••••ss. % s•••••.. ..t. ••• kg. ,01 ./.....•••• 1....•••••••„... g 't'4••,•;.•;•:ot.'..... •• -.•••.!.i il %S.‘,..../ • GP • ,..'..‘„ .. N..: •..'%?4•••••• • -''• N /4 if/ ,•• ••• 4` • ......"'• •,..L*,4,4,1;d:Eiji 7,1.,•4-" :•144•4tilf• iii‘,., ,;• 1.••••• •/ ... •••••••,,. • '"• •`'...%•''‘, •-••`•••••••••1 t -•-•.......... • •• .• ••• - • • t -'4 • i ill • • 1 , '.-15 a'•,4••••••• ••t 'all •--- `-4111•11104; iiii,--"••-:... , .. .„''.--,,,----.„ t..,"- c:'••\ c //,r/r.' •- ..• .....s.,,--..--: -Iic.:7-....,,i--.....-- - ipkviiit ., , O ,- ., . / ..,- s•-, . c ,/s/..//.... .. • ....... ,*(44-rtli= 140 • • •,% . .-- 741111 ,....,e.. / itilk..111 :-;...-i,•,i! '. -:`••.%,:‘,...*•,.2.:••,‘ 4- :////21,'.J.. . .. •'-1.• 71.g4.•*IP" ,..--,,:....""-----A i7.;•-_.„,,:.:- • -iftdoshitieZ°411.11'''' •'.'-' ,."'`vi;lb AP ,..,--•..---.„':-.-,;--.;N..... •-%„ .\\ „A., ••••,--.." '- --- .---:" - • _,..,,' ..31-:-•-;••40-• •9oitk ••.--,,, 46*it*itri--wo fAilli f .%•••g.... s:':,:jr.:-...:Sk.:‘,•,‘.'••••••••.• ''. ••.,.%\. N, ....#i\ .1 :5".2,/.'''°..:: :4••.,': 7:•-i—.::7-1---...t..e.--;-- 4i1411- - .4-. iiiW. ..,' •-1.: ---..-" ' '. ,. -1.-- •• .....-....- .,. \ ...,,. •• .-...„ii..4 ... -W•• „ •••••,.., • •, `-• •`:••••.. .... • ••• s".... ••••••••• 4 ••... ••• • e e 4.- 100,4, , • ,, ,e• .,44,_/ ..4..., ,s\s',.//-,'• WM. '••• •i4•• ""•••-•....... •,,.,...., ...s ,.,.....?• ............\s, "7:.1 ,r,' ,L, • #111C011111111.05 "••••••• . ..., • ..::•\••••!• • ,4-,,•••••.7...., -1 - 3111111110111111.lite '.,,.. "..:it ..;'. 4•••••"•/: • •,\•,‘\4••••*/,'•-•\.s:•-•-.....%. , 4111.1!•••,$4444L. s •••,.. ...„.....• „........"4„,..• , • .. ..0'-••• p,.• .0. ,.•••••••••......,s..•,...•••,. .‘•••• ,,i.4.V.,.,;.: ....‘,...., .1,1 .......•.-kz, -\ .. ••• ' ,. ••• N. cf• ,,,s,,„,..•-• , .•s,t ,. - •, •• •4., -k.„,•,. . '.. s- .,•••'-- -- . . vp .,- ... • ' " •.. ,•'' `'•••,'•''''s .‘• %\\"-YritZli404" Olt'L. •• , '•• .`'• '•\.;•",••:::,sks`•\ "4 •••.4.1,,,/.. . . 1 ... ••••.,....._ ,„,..• _,.:.,--• , , \...013, ,,,..,. \,V/,,,_%,,....:: .,,.‘., „, „„ *•*• \ ..... .••_, .....,,,!..,1% .,11.171,4411*. ,, "••••,.. ••,.•• •"..z.. •• •-•--. „. •••• •••--..,..".0,..ki.p.i.; ., , . . ,,, ,„...7.„„i,wa..,„kii•v7.7- : ,...........,;.....,.... -,•,...- -, - 1,.. • ‘ -. : . .41-1• i,-___ ..,. ..., , -Ne.-% ..., e,/- ..----.. -,...„.. -.N., ••••• . . f ,•• ,,s••••..- .1. ./"'••••••••••iii4'•''''illi'-‘71 ........% .' . 01.4.k.::‘ilVir• /,7..". ". ,„ •• ..4.110 • .. '•„'''- ••. ••\ ••• .•• . • s, %. 1 i •••% . •\%I.•:%.,‘ . ".--•"• ,t '''•"""-• •••,`.. • •••. \ • , . al ,,,•,...., -• - ..,._____,,,%go f„,,,,,")ail `‘...-- ., •ly.,17,•...•-' ",-,ije, •• .....,,-.., s•-..., ..,., ,„ , , , , •...............,•-•............,,,, • . --..., •-•••••_-- -,•:.;;„...-s•- •••• •••• • i \,, -•••,-.• co /1•••••• r---- ,.•-... ... '7'''-'' 2vr-41.1 Ow. - -. ,.- --- of wesio. „ • •- • - • •-•. .. •....._-_------- .. -.....,..-; .. ‘-•••,-;,',,,,, , A.\.:.: e ,7•*' . ....... .,..„ ...-"--....- .•-•-"''''--".• • ta ?••4 ' • • ‘.. ."•• S.. .•WY. 17 \ \ Vs', i • , , . /4 I•••"•"4-.....4.4,..0" ••„..•••....-0 •••i_ • • • \ „ , . , !. •••••••.....44. '',.....-••• 11'k ‘ \ ' .....•\• - /i-ray2--r: -"".--- .,,. ......---'" z ) . ....,-•••••••• ....• / / r' "..--• ••-• ... .* a. \ %, .Lill 04 „..•••• .4 i t.... \ \ \ 4 • •-s\ .,• -,•• s• \\..\ • \4% t-. . .2-1...4...... .„4........44_4.,•••••„ • //I • • •‘•••••,.\\\.,,. ..• ... ,., ...- ••.4_4... 1..7,e--..,4-..-....,,,,, ,„,,,,,e„;_•:••.,ss •••..,••••.. ..... _ \ \ •• ... ‘. ,. m4,4......3_ ._,, • ,4,• ,, c % ... .,,, 1,....Zsz‘ „../. ...0 •g,g••":::::...r••••••••••'..... ....• .....j. g:.... .g:,;..;gt.... g :.74.4.2:4.,, \\'',. s• \•S....,. ‘ -L, rogf stil'AIN ,,.. i i % 1...,1/4., V.. PI i . .,.,.. ,..„,.•••••••"•-•-•••••••-••••••••••••-- • --2,•-••• :. `••• \.. `, •\ \ .• ._; ._........./ .. ri g•,.\ \\..N - ,.,:r / •„.•''''l ,/". .... • • • .• i ,..1 „_,• ....Iv". " .s.............1- 4.*4--4.-......'.1::"4"....'..".".. '-4 ' .-. 1 ' l'--"f'•••• "'"-id Ills"t••••..1‘......f.4•••%..-* s. ...'"“'.......- .:""*.-"C":•::.(Nst\:•..\N., l'.., !, • ...- \. -•, ••' •C '''•Js.•'''‘..••...\•.1'''''••• \. ....-""•'".. • 1...'I ( '..• .• ' \ % i k ' \ \ N:`• O , ',.A-.• -...-•Ls... '••• •••`'. • i s s. s. •• `...s. :, •• t. /0—,7 rt...;•%•%%. flit._ 4" . • . ''.)%t.,-*::.-.---.;`,..••••••" • %: \\ -: . • - \ . \ .. .. , . v..„4...,„t.. -.. • , ...s.,„ . , ,..•,,,N. %.„. ,••, % % .,I,• ' ./`'. 1 •••,•••••:••1 -‘ ' . • ,...4.1:*•••.. •••••- ......0- • •.-- '.t, \ •„,••„„. ‘. . ••,....•,:-.,... \ 1 4,\ ..4 '..,•••••i .- ' • ,•kke.•-•••AAI: . .....,z;-.•`‘f.;-; • .'‘..... .' . ' . '."--...\\ .....s.4.7sst.1‘ .,• "••-••‘, ;,?:.-s:',..,..4s„',a= ‘• \'.. - \•. •---........„ .‘ ..,::-.0:1!„,,.;.....„::. I ' ---27-!Wrir...,...k,..•••-•., .,k.,‘.N...,`-----.---•-•,••.", ".:77..`•-• 3C .5 exxso r‘al • . ,4::::::::;:....;;;:,....!.......?, ••..-.....:.......z.,-,:..:..•:.„ . ,•,....,..,.......-.;,•-,;. ., 4.•-•t;',;`"--•••,.."••••••'-i•••:Z 41- us 1.3‘.1rti'Igo' ri Ai c,rthez n - •:•:•,:; ;-4:!;c:•?..s.:.,;-,:e.,f,.:_".;,::.E:z.'s::•:••••";.•..".7,:•',.--- 0. Si-MAW\ : ----, - ---1.,;44,.•,;•••=1--...*--.•• :••••••,,- ••• •••• 12 . • ....• ,...------:.-•-q.- ••......-...;....,:,•.•-• ••• • • ••••••••..,......„,,...!....„...-.•••• _. • • :A,k.A. 4... • ---,.,•-•:;.....,-:.".•,,...,„• . 4, , .• A- --- • 7s•-•., 1.:2:-`.•• ‘ / • 'tc.A-..A. /*V..* •,,• \•::-.. ..:. , . • C.oeccaat y 1 _ . T ji... • - ..tr ‘;,,k••\...s-.•••:- .01., i•OV t.A.A.CLA 0\ \.‘ /•‘4' .A, ,k-• 1/;1-..-) 4' . 044 511E PLAN CONCF'T STUDY .3,..k., c 4).'p e=•=wm.---_... .__ __--- !Cat INPAVIIIIINNIIIIIIIIIIMM1 1 In -..* )C.,Jec * 1 - ........ ,.. A ,-Jule lJ 0a.•18 Z1 ;77 7 ki n l S ; 1i1!uil 07 SS OSL 1 (Y IVY)--s 5 S S CJ J17(&) **************************************************************** City of. Renton WA Receipt ******************************************************xk******** Receipt Number: R0003243 Amount : 16 .50 06/15/00 15 : 11 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #6695 HALINEN LA Init : LN Project #: LUA99-178 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: SOUTH SIDE OF SR 900 BTWN 76TH AVE S & THOMAS Total Fees: 4, 732 . 01 This Payment 16 .50 Total ALL Pmts: 4, 732 . 01 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 16 . 50 HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L Halinen,P.E. • Bellevue Place/Bank of America Bldg. (425)454-8272 davidhalinen@halinenlaw.com 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(425)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 May 10, 2000 E ' 'I VED HAND-DELIVERED Ay 10 2000 Renton Planning Commission EcoNom,cANDNEIGN8PELOP,UENT, do Judy Wright, Secretary to the Commission STRA•TEGICoo Ns, 1055 S. Grady Way, Sixth Floor "'"G Renton, Washington 98055 RE: The Merlino SR 900 Property Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone City of Renton File No. LUA 99-178, ECF,R,CPA(00M7 and 00T4) The Applicants' Written Submissions For the Public Hearing Record Dear Commission Members: I represent the applicants concerning the above-referenced proposed Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone. As you know, I attended and testified before you during the May 3, 2000 public hearing concerning it. Tam writing in response-to the idea put forward by several people at the public hearing that the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone would have a significant impact upon the heron rookery to the south of the site. To help put that issue into perspective, I am herewith sending you the following four items: (1) An exhibit prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. consisting of a parcel map superimposed on a City ofRenton 4/9/99 color aerial orthophoto of the site (with the location of the heron rookery depicted on the exhibit as • well as 500-foot and 1,000-foot radius rings around the rookery and the building and parking lot footprints ofthe site plan ofthe already-approved and soon-to-be constructed building "Oaksdale Center"--also known as Black River Corporate Park Tract B—lying to the south of the rookery); (2) ' A copy of the October 19, 1998"Report and Decisions"ofthe City ofRenton Hearing Examiner concerning the site plan for the then-proposed Black River Corporate Park Tract B project and the appeal by Friends of the Black River that had sought the imposition of additional mitigation measures upon that project for heron rookery protection; (3) A May 10, 2000 letter from natural resource ecologist Theresa R. Henson (a consultant who has worked on the three most recent development projects closest to the rookery, including the Black River Corporate Park Tract B project); and Renton Planning Commission May 10, 2000 Page 2 (4) My mark-up of several pages out of Renton's Zoning Use Table. Let me explain why I have made these submittals to you. First, the Barghausen photo exhibit demonstrates that the distance from the nearest portion of the subject property to the heart of the heron rookery(about 1,100 feet) is much greater than the distance from the nearest already-site plan approved and soon-to-be constructed building in the "Oaksdale Center" (Black River Corporate Park Tract B) to the heart of the heron rookery (about 570 feet). Second,the October 19, 1998 Hearing Examiner's Report for the Black River Corporate Park Tract B demonstrates the great amount of care and attention to detail that the Hearing Examiner spent in considering the heron rookery issue on that project and in establishing on a project basis the specific conditions of approval that he did in that Report after considering extensive oral and documentary evidence and legal argument. That report granted site plan approval for the Black River Corporate Park Tract B project (allowing the development footprint that is depicted on the Barghausen photo exhibit) despite many of the same arguments that the opponents of the Merlino rezone proposal are now leveling against that rezone. Third, the May 10, 2000 letter from natural resource ecologist Theresa R. Henson is from someone who has been through the thick and thin of the heron rookery controversy for eight years in conjunction with three different development projects (including the "Oaksdale Center"/Black River Corporate Park Tract B project). Thus, it is important for you to note her letter's explanation that"[c]onstruction of these projects has not negatively impacted the herons"and that"[i]n fact this heron rookery has grown larger each year". Note also her letter's conclusion that: In view of (1)the experience and precedents of the last three projects permitted near the rookery, (2) the City's Critical Areas Ordinance and (3) the substantial distance between the subject property and the rookery, no reason exists to suppose that rezoning and development ofthe[Merlino]property will have a any significant impact upon the heron rookery. Fourth, the accompanying mark-up of several pages out of Renton's Zoning Use Table demonstrates that uses currently permitted under the Merlino property's CA and CO zoning are less limited than the permitted uses under the proposed RM-I zoning of the property.' Thus, the argument the proposed zone will somehow cause greater impacts to the heron rookery than the existing zoning.is fallacious. 'Note also that flats or townhouses are already permitted in the CA zone in conjunction with first floor retail uses. Renton Planning Commission May 10, 2000 Page 3 In sum, despite the opposition from the groups focusing on heron rookery protection, the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map,and Text Amendments and Rezone are appropriate, won't be harmful to the rookery and should be granted. The site plan review process is the appropriate forum for consideration of the details of the heron-related issues that have been raised. (The October 19, 1998 Hearing Examiner report concerning the site plan for the Black River Corporate Park Tract B project demonstrates that.) The Planning Commission is not the appropriate forum to undertake the quasi-judicial hearing role assigned under the City's Code to the Hearing Examiner for consideration of such matters. Thank you for your anticipated consideration of this letter and the accompanying materials during your deliberations on the subject request. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. avid L. Hali en Enclosures cc: Donald J. Merlino (with copies of enclosures) Gary M. Merlino (with copies of enclosures) Susan Carlson, Administrator, City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning (with copies of enclosures) Rebecca Lind, Principal Planner, City of Renton Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning (with copies of enclosures) • THERESA R. HENSON CONSULTING Assessment,Management and Regulatory Permitting P.O.Box 7208 Tacoma,WA, 98406 (206)756-0370 May 10, 2000 RECEIVED Renton Planning Commission MAY 1 0 2000 City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Renton, Washington 98126-2715 AND STIRA T GIIC PLANNING RE: COMMENTS FOR THE MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AND REZONE (00M7 and 00T4) I am a Natural Resource Ecologist,with a Masters Degree in Environmental Science. I have been asked by the rezone proponent to comment in response to the concerns that have been expressed about potential impacts of the rezone on the Renton heron rookery. During the last eight years I have worked on the three projects most recently permitted near the Renton heron rookery: 1. The Renton Sewage Treatment Plant Wetland Enhancement Project, which is located 1,000 feet southwest of the heron rookery. This project included heavy outdoor construction within 1,100 feet of the heron rookery during the summer months. 2. The last Phase of the Blackriver Corporate Park, which is located less than 500 feet south of the heron rookery. This project limited construction of buildings to within about 500 feet of the nearest nest in the heron rookery. Construction of a storm water pond was allowed within 400 feet of the nearest nest in the heron rookery. Heavy outdoor construction was not allowed between January 15 and June 15 during the heron nesting season. 3. Rivertech,which is located 1,400 feet east of the heron rookery. This project has no limitations associated with construction near the heron rookery. Construction of these projects has not negatively impacted the herons. In fact, this heron rookery has grown larger each year. Developers of these projects have provided over 100 acres of habitat and open space for the herons through set-a-sides required by the City of Renton Critical Areas Ordinance, sale of various properties to the City of Renton, and donation of other property to the City of Renton. The attached map indicates the locations and acreage of each of these areas (including the permanent city open space, the riparian forest habitat, and P-1 Detention Basin that 1 • was provided by a developer for construction of the existing habitat adjacent to the heron rookery). The nearest point of the south edge of the Merlino property is located about 1,100 feet north of the heron rookery. Riparian forest, permanent City open space and an active railroad right-of-way all lie between the heron rookery and the Merlino property. Under the City of Renton Critical Areas Ordinance(which provides for protection of steep slopes,wetlands, and streams), portions of the Merlino property will be prohibited from development no matter how the site is zoned. In view of (1)the experience and precedents of the last three projects permitted near the rookery, (2) the City's Critical Areas Ordinance and (3)the substantial distance between the subject property and the rookery, no reason exists to suppose that rezoning and development of the property will have any significant impact upon the heron rookery. Sincerely, Theresa R. Henson Natural Resource Ecologist cc: Donald J. Merlino David L.Halinen,Esq. Rebecca Lind, City of Renton Department of Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Rob Jenkins,City of Renton Department of Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning 2 • Merl. no Bv� G ,90�0TOrt,NORTHERN .q,1k Y#opei j GOB( OPEN SPACE - HABITAT Palma CITY t •�.7!Acwa! O►!H ACI HASITAT g01414 RIPARIAN FOREST - HABITAT 00 S . SLIP ACMES !ST P. DETENTION. Oy� /<IUM,$TATOH PERMANENT CITY OPEN SPACE • HABITAT ta.._ 8►ac k == ill =STOP ti�bu S le_ R:uitr X� 72.27 ACMES . L'a/rperwl-t N� PnPiG e O - ic441Q10 ' a Et . ...,4044.1-Eliadria..... / AL4' Ka sum i . Wet(aT�,d, . ''0 h.e..b:fah+ esTONr YQAO r*ci tTr pa- a i 7/.7.:%'a*Towr i Ilk IM 7, •-----&.. ik •s OAT *1"*" v. C3P19.4 (:_ - % co.s."141‘.1 NORn� NTS • KEY - KAP ' ..... . 4-2-06o < - RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS a) ZONING o • E c = lif2 > USE _ L a1 , , a) O a) a1 O ' i o � is is <o a a is io Id -. --1 M = c ca t to c c4 R TABLE � > � � � � � � � � � � � 0 � � 4) L o �, . .L 3 L o � MO O Q O Q O Q O w a) a a) a a) 4 w�.. +L. �", •y a) ti.. .0 ... a1 R .. ° . a) L. a) O M P -- ,a = � _ Pm 73 ❑ 73 ❑ _ N N N "I E a) .c E E . o c E a) �; 'O n c N N ui N c i ❑ u ❑ N) = = = = c E c c. 'Ea) c 3 E .!--.) c fA a) o a) ❑ a1 ❑ a) ❑ a) as a) O a1 a) = 'D .o 'a O O a) a1 a) O L. o o" O w a) o = U cc ,- = 1n = co [c M _ .- _ ,- _ M .E .E .E 0 0 O z U 0 Q 0 ❑ 0 0 U cc USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CC CN CS CA CD CO COR ti .`y:��`'-..`Sc -i�;7di.+��p.-;•••.�'•'�'a; :. ._at: a. ,`; .,�7».:�aT�.._ ,a�..,rtR.v;.'<..:vy_�.:..;: ;�: .. ..•' _ A.AGRICULTURE RESOURCE PRODUC_TiON•AND ANIMAL KEEP,IN(� ai g- .t:1 .1' 4 Z4 A.� - _. y . �_ .... .. ,... -r_. .` '-._-. ._. ,.. . ._�+-ate?.� ;YfS�^' ..i+.,.:L'fia:.�:i}rr�.1..,�. .�S�:.A7.e?,.+.. _ -"� .. � '�;t 7.�:"cam:..<`R °,.w�'%.�"'e .�..r- nimal Related Uses—Noncommercial Animal husbandry (small animals) S245 S245 s190 S197 S197 - i Animal husbandry (medium • animals) S246 S246 S191 S198 S19a Animal husbandry (large animals) s247" S247 S192 S199 S199 • Greater number of animals than allowed above H196 H196 H196 H200 S/H200 w Beekeeping S194 S194 P co Common household pets AC/ AC/ AC/ AC/ . AC195 AC195 AD221 AD201 AC201 AD203 AC204 AD203 Kennels, hobby P205 P205 S269 P205 S220 AD148 (Amd.Ord.4786, 7-12-1999) • Animal Related Services . Kennels P74 P269 P • Stables,commercial P270 P Stables/riding schools/animal boarding S89 Veterinary offices/clinics no exterior kennels, runs or stables S207 S207 S207 S77 S127 P I P S2071 Veterinary offices/clinics with • kennels P. P74 P269 Veterinary offices with kennels, • runs or stables AD207 AD271 AD207 AD AD207 (Amd. Ord.4786, 7-12-1999) . Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Adminlstrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically . RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC : R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 MM� IL IM IH CC CN CS �CAA� CD CO COR . .` 4 = _ ..4_ ��4tii L'�% i-:• A '-90 mot• <..Xw `��s. - .:',..- ed �' S � . 77 1; '•f_ ...`'_ , 4r:Pr-o:4 t l.•=T'�:"✓'-.f4�Yf. 4:: -'., d z 3;V t.n .,,1 ,y ,e44,4e,_ .- _ B..RESIDENTIAL Contiriu _ wf, ;;,;:�, �� ., . Manufactured Homes, Etc: Manufactured homes P113 - Manufactured homes, designated P113.. P113 P113 P113 P113 P113 P113 Manufactured home, temporary for medical hardship T172., T172 T172 T172 T172 T172 • Mobile homes P113 Mobile home single family . residential building AC Modular homes P113 P113 P113 P113 P113 P113 RV spaces in manufactured home . park(up to 6) • AD39 RV spaces in manufactured home park(over 6) H39 Variable lot standards AD Attached Dwellings • N Townhouses, up to 3 consecutively attached P183 Townhouses, over 3 consecutively attached S184 • Townhouses, up to 4 consecutively attached P244 P116 P116 . Flats or townhouses, no greater • than 2 units total per building (existing legal) P P P • Flats, no greater than 4 units total per building P244 Flats or townhouses (existing legal) P P P P Flats or townhouses _ � P113• P116 P116 S1`07 P76 P119 mis Flats . S184 S120 P116 P116 Flats with townhouses in one structure. S184 (Amd. Ord. 4773, 3-22-1999; Ord. 4777, 4-19-1999) • Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use, AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use . #=Conditlon(s) X=Prohibited Specifically . RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 AM IL IM IH CC CN CS CA CD CO COR Amin* IIIMM Moon ELPg§IRENTI44(CorPPPecl) ,',3),;',7, : s,-,; ,,;,.;,;‘,;.::,'..;:',:;:f::.;.fi...'::,'.5:-:..-- ....:t',1,:::': ::•:.. ''`':,f'. .-`-.;;',,,:i.-:z;;: ,',:sCi'.?,:;7: ';',R':::::.;;;::',` :!„:7,•;<*t.''-il:'-'!:-4'.:,:',1;.i;:;i`.:!.:*.?i;,:- .;:'; ','i',:.,.:4,:•::::::-7:;,-,,,':.,.,-;•,:',,r,i `::.'.i,!.,-':.': .: Residential Accessory . Accessory buildings AC32 AC28 AC27 AC27 AC53 AC55 AC55 AC55 Accessory dwelling unit, family housing AD36 Agricultural/animal support buildings AC24 First floor lobbies, common areas AC112 . _ Home occupations AC34 AC34 AC34 AC34 AC34 AC34 AC34 S33 Recreational and community _ - facilitiesAC53 • Other Residences and Lodging Adult family home P. P P P PP PP P116 P116 P . . . Bed and breakfast houses H31 AD29 AD29 AD29 AD29 AD29 AD30 P S68 Boarding and lodging houses AD P116 P116 P S68 Group homes I H H , Group homes II P _ Group homes II, for 6 or less P P P PP PP P116 P116 P P Group homes II, for 7 or more H H H H H H H P116 P116 H H AD Hotel S207 S207 S207 AD127 S207 P • Hotel/convention center with office and/or residential uses on-site P Motels S207 S207 S207 P Retirement residences H H AD P P116 P116 P S209 P (Amd. Ord. 4773, 3-22-1999; Ord. 4777,4-19-1999; Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999) C. RpTAII..:SALES '.4.;..; :;,.:::y.,.. ...:: ::::''.;.i.- ;,;. ...f4v: :,.::::-4;' ;,.!:.:7;.,,,:::::;j1.!.,.:11':'; .'.›.-'7::'1':':.;.;: --,,-,.. ...,-;- .:'''';:::: ::*;'4;., .-',-,-j :. ,: :"f-',,.", ";;:::n::::',:-:.; ;'."::4;:4]:;-,;4 ::',.., .,:!.:-;.. -=',,'n,•.,'„.,'-: .,-,',,j,,A,',-:.::;;A:: :'::''::.! :--: . Adult retail use S60 S60 560 560 S60 S60 560 S227 Art galleries AD Apparel and accessories S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 S68 — Appliances S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 Auto supplies S207 S207 S207 S151 P127 P P S207 Books, music, stationery, art supply S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 S68 Building, hardware, garden materials S150 S150 S150 S151 P133 P144 S85 S150 Bulk retail outlet P74 P P 7... .F• < r:. 7i Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use e AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=HearIng Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically c f C RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS , USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 AM IL IM IH CC CN CS CA CD CO COR OEM lomEN 1 II:RESIDENTIAL(Continued): :;,:,--,,- ?: !:j,''',:.,.':ii•:',.. a,'s;,; ',',,:-.:;.!.::;i -,,i*:::•: ::,!-:,i:':-.-'.::,',!,:,:,- :':.,,g.,'='i','CA',.. '.i.P '::;.;',.-V,';f:. ;'',', .:,:•-:,5,';i:56',"-,.L:.:-.II:',l'.•,,,i,:E,';' ''',.:':i- k:,i,.,*;!,'':-''':''.!':',::',-'1;A:•!':',''''')'; i:;::.:;: ''..,',;'',':'':' ,:.::' ':.-.. - - Residential Accessory Accessory buildings AC32 AC28 AC27 AC27 AC53 AC55 AC55 AC55 I — Accessory dwelling unit, family housing AD36 . . Agricultural/animal support buildings AC24' - First floor lobbies, common areas AC112 Home occupations AC34 AC34 AC34 AC34 AC34 AC34 AC34 S33 Recreational and community facilities AC53 Other Residences and Lodging Adult family home PP PP PP PP P116 P116 P . Bed and breakfast houses H31 AD29 AD29 AD29 AD29 AD29 AD30 P S68 Boarding and lodging houses AD P116 P116. P S68 Group homes I H H . . -.) Group homes II P L Group homes II, for 6 or less P P P PP P P P116 P116 P P Group homes II, for 7 or more H H H H H H H P116 P116 H H AD Hotel S207 3207 S207 AD127 S207 P • Hotel/convention center with office and/or residential uses on-site P Motels S207 S207 S207 P Retirement residences H H AD P P116 P116 P S209 P (Amd. Ord. 4773, 3-22-1999; Ord. 4777,4-19-199.9; Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999) C:.ifigmiALgS,.'f',,:?.'iie,V:f.',','' ',','';'4i;:;. ,:0?-. .',1' ; ',•ii:,';',.':N.:-A-: ?,: :.:•PL: :: : :,.:,,,,:.,-,*,:,. , : :.:: :;,),:p:. :e;.:4.:ji,;4!,i,z1,:. ::.,:.,.!H:;,t, ', :U: ,i:V,',',&,.; ,:::.;,•:',A1';-4;1,;F:?:.: 3:,zrg,n,i' :,:,-!':::;!:, Adult retail use S60 S60 S60 S60 360 S60 360 S227 Art galleries AD Apparel and accessories S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 S68 Appliances S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 p P S207 Auto supplies S207 S207 S207 S151 P127 P P S207 Books, music, stationery, art supply ,S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 • P P S207 S68 Building, hardware, garden materials S150 S150 S150 S151 P133 P144 i S85 S150 Bulk retail outlet- P74 P P - • 71. * , Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use c •J cr. AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=HearIng Examiner Conditional Use #=Conditlon(s) X=Prohibited Specifically c 5. C. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL 4 COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS r.- . , USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CC CN CS Latri CD CO COR E. ...... c ... a RETAIL SALES (Continued)4;:,,,l :':: :.%-:',,i':,,,4i;::-i: :-4:ji':' .,.::::,,.,::,::1!i•(-::;2,;5'', .`t.:';': .';:7-; .k':,'t!.: .:'1,':7:::.i!'''4" .4: ;: : :V.'C'6;':il' 6;!';:':'4:1; '':* i '';''''' :::':;'','=''. ;1';::; .'-'%i'. ,":: :' `?:,:. ',Z ''‘k0 .',.':::' i.',,::-'': C Coal yards . P P270 Convenience goods S189 S189 S189 S189 Convenience market H188 Department and variety S207 S207 S207 P127 P P S207 Drug store S207 S207 S207 P S207 Eating and drinking establishments H188 P P P P165 P105 P127 P P S234 S137 Espresso carts and temporary food vendors S207 S207 S207 AD230 Fabrics and related supplies S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P I P S207 Feed stores H Florist - S207 S207. S207 P S207 , Flowers, plants, and floral supplies S207 S207 S207 S166 P105 P127 P S207 Food • S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 Food store no more than 25,000 square feet of gross floor area S68 Furniture S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 Groceries , S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P S207 :). Hobbies,toys, games S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 Home furnishings S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P : P S207 Jewelry S207 S207 S207 P127 P P S207 Liquor stores S207 S207 S207 S151 S131 P S88 S207 Lumberyards P74 P P Microbrewery/brew pubs . H AD Mini-marts P P P P165 P105 P127 P P S234 Monuments, tombstones, and gravestones S207 S207 S207 P S207 Newsstands S207 S207 S207 S166 P105 P127 P. P S207 S68 Office and business supplies, computers ' S207 S207 S207 P S207 Office supplies , S207 S207 S207 P127 S207 Personal medical supplies S207 S207 S207 P127 P P S207 Pet shop and grooming S207 _S207 S207 P127 P P S207 Pharmacies - S207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 568 Photographic and electronic supplies S207 S207 3207 P105 P127 P P S207 • Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Conditlon(s) X=Prohibited Specifically • RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 11Mma IL IM IH CC CN CS CA CD CO COR C sporm p-AkpN:, (Continued) Retail sales involving outside storage 3181 Retail uses S207 S207 S207 S259 Sporting goods S207 S207 3207 P105 P127 P P S207 Taverns AD AD P AD S68 Used goods and antiques 3207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P. P S207 Variety stores P105 (Amd. Ord.4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999; Ord. 4827, 1-24-2000) D.WI-IpLESAL : Agricultural crop sales P Fuel dealers H270 Fuel yards P P • Wholesale outlets P74 P P (Amd. Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999) ECULTURAL;':ENTERTAINMENTAND.RECREATIONAL , ,_.• - Parks and Open Space N). Open space (new) 32 S2 S2 H H182 S2 S174 S117 3117 H AD S2 P S2 S162 P (7:3 Open space (existing) PP P P P PP P P P P P P P P P Park, playground or recreation/ community center HH2 HHHHHHHHHHHHH ' HHH Parks, regional (new) 32 S2 S2 H H182 H S174 3117 S117. H AD 32 P S2 S162 P Parks, regional (existing) PP P P P PPP P P P P P P P P Parks, community(new) S2 32 S2 H S251 32 3174 S117 S117 H 32 S2 P S2 S162 P Parks, community (existing) PP P P P PPP P P P P P P P P Parks, neighborhood (new) S2 S2 S2 • S2 33 S251 S2 3174 S117 S117 S2 S2 S2 P S2 S162 P- . Parks, neighborhood (existing) p P P P P PPP P P PPPPPIP Trails (new) S2 S2 S2 H H182 AD S174 S117 S117 H AD S2 P S2 S162. IP Trails (existing) • PP PP P PP P P P P P P P PIP (Amd. Ord.4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999) Recreational Facilities Golf courses (existing) P7 P222 P Golf courses, private, new H • P222 H5 Golf courses, public, new H P222 S2 • Marinas I P125 72.? Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically ,— 7' n RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS .c.,,• USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 i Ina. IL IM IH CC CN CS CA CD COO COR Q MENEM IMM g•'::PM-TU13N4gnIEFITIMNMENTAPIPSgPPEgIPN414C9ntiP000Y ;:;•, ,,: -.''.:? ,;!,t;ii' . , < .-::‘ Recreational facilities (indoor or outdoor) AC53 S187 S207 S118 S173 S173 AC50 Recreational services AD62 (Amd.Ord.4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999) Entertainment/Amusement Adult entertainment business S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S227 Adult motion picture studios S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S227 Adult motion picture theaters S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S227 Amusement arcades S207 S207 S207 S99 S131 P I P S207 Amusement parks H207 H207 H207 H H207 Bowling alleys S207 S207 S207 • P127 P i P S207 Card rooms S255 S272 S255 X X S255 X X Dance halls and cabarets S207 S207 S207 H AD127 P J H S207 Not for profit gambling casinos/ games of chance/bingo H207 H270 H207 H H207 Outdoor commercial recreation or iv entertainment uses H Peep shows, panorams S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S60 S227 Sports arenas, auditoriums, exhibition halls S207 S207 S207 P145 P126 S207 Theaters S207 S207 S207 P P P62 Theaters, drive-in S207 S207 S207 P S207 (Amd.Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4827, 1-24-2000) Cultural Library or museum, public or nonprofit HHHH , HH H H H H H H H H H5 H H H Libraries AD Museums AD • I (Amd.Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999) 1 F.OFFICE:AND.CONFERENCE ;,.....,:':.:,.-!::: . , .,::.::.-, :,,.,.: , ;..;,, :.,.... : ....,,,- . .i,.. .:'-, i.:,'",<•,.::,-c,..., •:;...li5:: ::‘,•: .;'!".y.':•••:.:,- .:;. ',;.,1:") : ::'.g,.:: : Administrative headquarters S71 S71 S71 P 3 PP I P - 1 Administrative headquarters, existing legal S275 • I Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohlbited Specifically . , RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS I INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 I Rj IL IM IH CC CN CS CA CD CO COR F-...9FFJPP AND CONFERENCE: (Continued) Business 53 P P Medical and dental clinics 3207 S207 S207 AD P P 1 P Offices S155 P P Personal S173 AD98 5134 P P Private conference centers S207 S207 S207 S207 AC AC Professional S207 S207 S207 AD98 S134 P 1 P P P (Amd.Ord.4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999; Ord. 4803, 10-25-1999) G..SEFIVIggqWiei,4:',: .0:':6;-.t.',:•': ::41.4,' il'',:;-: ...'::,•:':', 14;',');`%,:i.l.''; '''.,:'.:::::: ':.,::.:, 1., ,'. :'§:K:':(...,:,..'.,: -);'.V..;'..;.::,--t.,i'.',;:.',.,;:,,':::ti:..:,. .."f-:: .'?..:'.::T.,:.;:.: ::.C.'?'-'. ..:T:).:.' ;2:' ','''... :.'. ..',;. ''''k';:.;:,<.':.:::-•;:).C-:.'::::.: .'::''''''.'. Auction houses S223 P S207 P 6223 Barber,beauty shops - S207 S207 S207 P165 P P S207 S6i Business services,general. P P P S134 P P S259 Cemetery, crematory, columbarium, mausoleum HHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHH Commercial laundries - P74 P S18 Computer services (retail) 5207 S207 3207 P 1 S207 Dry cleaning plants P74 P T Financial institutions S259 S259 S259 S259 S153 --, Financial and real estate 3207 S207 S207 P105 P127 P P S207 cri _ Funeral homes S207 S207 S207 P127 P P S207 Health clubs/fitness centers/sports clubs S207 S207 S207 S151 P127 P P S259 S154 .._ Laundromats H188 S207 3207 S207 S166 P127 P P S207 Personal service 3259 S259 S259 P127 P P S259 S68 Pet shop and grooming S207 3207 S207 P127 P P 3207 Photography and photo I reproduction S207 S207 3207 P P S207 - _ . Printing, xerography(retail) S207 S207 S207 P S207 _ I Professional services S207 S207 S207 Si S207 --- Professional sports teams/ promoters S207 P S207 AD P 3207 (Amd.Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999) Rental Services Rental services,with outside storage S225 5225 S225 AD127 Si S225 ....., 7. . 0 t .1. A Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use c. AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically C iz 5 ,.. r RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS I_r- 2. USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14� RM IL IM - IH CC CN CS CA CD COmpli COR G:SE o .....y.. VIGES C ntlntted � �� Rental services, no outside storage P74 P S2o7 AD P127 P I P S207 Video rentals and sales S2o7 S207 S207 S166 P105 P127 P P S207 (Amd.Ord.4786, 7-12-1999) Repair Services Electrical repair S207 S2o7 S2o7 S135 P S97 S2o7 S68 Repair services S207 S207 S207 P S2o7 Shoe repair P165 P S68 Television repair S207 S207 S207 S135 P S97 S207 S68 Upholstery repair S207 S2o7 S207 S135 P S97 S2o7 S68 Watches/jewelry repair S207 S207 S207 S135. P S97 S207 S68 (Amd.Ord.4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999; Ord. 4803, 10-25-1999) - Day Care Services Family day care AC AC AC AC P AC AC AC + S207 S207 S207 P165 P105 P127 P P P P Day care centers : H H H H H H H182 H S259 S259 S259 P165 P105 P127 P P P S68 Adult day care I, maximum 4 on N.) residential property AC AC AC AC P AC AC AC AD H H P165 P105 P127 P P P P Adult day care I, maximum 12 on Et) nonresidential property AC AC AC AC P AC AC AC S260 S260 S260 P165 P105 P127 P P P P Adult day care II,5+on residential property H H H H H H H H AD H H P165 P105 P127 P P P S68 Adult day care II, 13+on nonresidential property H H H H H H H182 H AD H H P165 P105 P127 P P P62 S68 (Amd.Ord.4773, 3-22-1999; Ord. 4786,7-12-1999) Health Services Convalescent centers and nursing homes H H H H P/H P105 P127 H P S209 AD Hospitals, sanitarium or similar uses H H HHH H H H H261 H261 H261 H H H H H H261 H Medical institutions S212 (Amd.Ord. 4786,7-12-1999; Ord. 4802, 10-25-1999) H..TRANSPORTAT,ION SERVICES ANDMANtIFACTURED;HOME.SALES,$ ;:;,�.,„, , .:r. ',; .'s ;..,-.:;..:... .:::. :. . .• ., , . >. Auto impoundment yard H270 P Automobile, motorcycle, passenger IP truck leasing S2o7 S2o7 S207 AD43 Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically - _ • RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: .RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CC CN CS Lat CD CO COR INMEINI IMIIIM H.113ANSPORTATION:sERVICES AND,MANUFACTURED HOME iSALES(Continued),;•<,,,:'4,..,;... ::,',..,..,,,, ,--.: z4 .•:,'•/-'-',.";-,.i'',:'•'-':;E:.;•..,•••,.,.!..• .:::1'.ft-,•'.'sz":',;:-••<:,-,:.•,:A,:;:'...'.,*..:.:. - - Automobile, motorcycle,passenger truck rental P74 P S207 AD43 P Automobile, motorcycle, passenger truck sales P74 P P P Boat leasing, sales, rental P74 P P AD43 P - _ . Body shops P74 P P 11159 4 Bus terminals,taxi headquarters AD158 AD158 AD158 AD158 AD158 Car washes 7 _ P P P AD65 P P P S207 AC81 _ Construction equipment rental P Express delivery/hauling, cargo • handling with central terminal P74 P Express delivery/handling AD127 Gasoline service stations P P P AD P P P I S207 Heavy equipment sales, storage P . . Heavy equipment wholesale sales, storage P Heavy equipment rental P N3, _ Heavy hauling vehicles rental P A Industrial engine or transmission rebuild P74 P P Mobile homes sales P74 P . - - Mobile home/trailer/RV sales/rental . P74 P P Parking garages, accessory, exceeding the 33%of the gross floor area limit AD207 AD207 AD207 AD Parking garages, commercial P AD S139 51601 S12 S1601 P - . Parking garages, noncommercial S160 , S160 AC50 P S - Parking lots, commercial P AD S139 S160I S12 AD62 I Public parking S207 S207 S207 P I _ Railroad yards _P RV sales, rental P74 P P _ Taxi and individual transportation S177 P AD Tow truck operation H273 P Trailer rental ' P Transit centers . H207 H207 H207 H I P H207 . n 2. < _ g. r Blank=Not Allowed P=PrImary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use c 7.7 AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically c c sc , • rT RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS I i N USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-1,4_I R IL IM • IH CC CN CS CA CD CO COR .:,,, 140 :0,Ns pp Rwio msERvicas AN D:MAN UFACTUREDHOMESALES-(Conti hued):.-:). :,:,.;?a;,..,:v;,.: :-.,:i'-: ,,,,'.:,:',,-is. '7i,,,.A:gic•C‘'''.:••..; •'''••:•" ';'`,•••',-; ':': •.'‘;'':'''''::.: ' ':' • '- : ''' ' •'' ' - ' - , - - - . e Transportation services - Truck/RV/bus sales S217 • Truck rental . P74 P _ Truck sales P74 P . . Truck terminals and associated warehousing P Uses determined by the Zoning Administrator that directly support dealerships S207 S207 S207 • P Vehicle service and repair, large P74 P P AC216 _ Vehicle service and repair, small P74 P P AD11 P P P Wrecking yard, auto H270 H (Amd.Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999; Ord.4802, 10-25-1999) Air Transportation Uses . Airplane sales and repair P Helipads, accessory to primary use H S207 S207 • H I H H 1;3 Helipads, commercial . H 8 Municipal airports H (Amd.Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999) LS170RAGE:g ,jihVni,-,%, •:(:;,..".; :',.m 5,,,..,:s:v,;: :,:;',.`,,',`0:' ,.,-A-.,','::.?:x.;.-,,"-:':•-:4 ...:ij;.t:',f.,i; :;;': z.;,:',.!;..,..,.,,.::::,.,,,',:i....-.::.;,. .,?i,:at:,,..,,:',..5.:.,::::. ,.).-,,,:v. ..-;!,.,::6 ,- ,::;.7.:,::,.,.• ,:....:,',,.. -.,',.-•:q!'1W,:.%,', .,',.,&,.::.: , Bulk storage AD19 Bulk storage exceeding minimum area requirements AD19 Explosives H H215 Explosives, accessory AC Farm produce refrigeration and • storage P Hazardous material storage,on-site H47 Hazardous waste,off-site(including treatment) H211 H274 H211 Hazardous waste,on-site(including AC129/ AC129/ AC129/ treatment) H235 H274 H235 Indoor storage AC254 AC254 AC254 AC254 1 Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary lite AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically • RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CC CN CS lopiChie CD CO COR IPP•010111 eifilla STORAGE IC.13.11Pr1.90),,zia4,F;'!XtAlktl'i-Uw;IA:',',:'4:;::!,.,,::.:: :::0:::: :: ::v1., -;,:f,&.i.A:,:ii. ;:.;-.-,.:. ,*:.,g:,!!,;,,,.g?1 ,4,,:,;,-;;.!i:i...ra,;:, :,::8*. ,-;fo;, :;V5,,n:i'mun:: :: :';4',3.!,:4•iw.P;1!;',;,:f:::,:::;i::: : ,'. : Indoor storage exceeding the 33% floor area limit for accessory uses S262 S262 S262 AD42 Natural gas storage AD — Outdoor storage S263 S263 S263 AD57 Outside storage (including vehicles/ . equipment/products) AC87 AC87 AC87 Petroleum/natural gas over 50,000 I gallons H H - . Petroleum/natural gas to 50,000. gallons AC129. AC129 AC129 Self-service storage, existing P P Self-service storage S38 1 S264 P268 P H136 S26411 Self-storage when part of mixed - • use development H Warehousing P P - . Warehousing and storage P74 P P 1\3, (Amd.Ord.4736, 8-24-1998; Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999) - ikMANPFAPTP RIP AND IPPPgFPA4atiZ-1 :: 'i:',' 'r/511,, Mmii,..." . : .hi.',.,‘R',.A:'0--'',Y7-1- - ' 6?Un':`;'6A';-:M]4i,-- ;:aiR,{aRl,'I''':::;'. Any H-1 District use in the L-1 Zone H Breweries P74 P P Brick,tile, terra cotta manufacturing, storage AD270 AD Cement, lime, gypsum manufacturing H270 H I Concrete batching plant AD270 P _ Construction office P - Contractor's and manufacturer's representatives P74 P Contractors' office with storage of , . equipment/materials P74 P Disinfectant manufacturer H Distilleries P74 P P Electronic manufacturing and assembly S207 S207 S207 Zs AD20 I Hazardous waste treatment, off-site H H H I < x c.. C ;73 Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use ..: AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically - _ RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS I•i I. 0. USES: - RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 LILL' IL IM - IH CC CN CS CA CD lam COR i spolos -‘c-, .4EMMPFAPTIRYP:ANR:INPMPTRIALIPPPori400): :1,( :',,A,::::: : : ::‘, :.::1,:::.::5:-,.;/.,,,-:-i.;,:*.:-,,,4!0; g4WiftAL.:5-', 0, -,vw.:,7:.:3M: : :.ih'.,M.::- .;':',4-V-; .7:':-'::',‘,.:;•'-•. Industrial/manufacturing facilities (existing) P128 Industrial/manufacturing facilities, major modification, production increase or expansion of existing H276 Labs:grinding and assembly of optical lens and eyeglasses S207 S207 S207 AD127 Si S161 AD210 Labs:medical, dental . S207 P S207 AD127 P S214 AD207 - Labs:small product assembly(i.e., hearing aids/dental fixtures) S . S161 Leather and lather goods • , manufacturing AD15 Manufacturing of stone,clay, glass, concrete AD270 Movie production and distribution AD P . . Research, development and testing P74 P P Si I AD AD20 H Soap and compound manufacturing AD270 AD ry Tanning, curing, storage of rawhide " • r.) a or skins AD270 AD Wineries P74 P Assembly and packaging of: Computer AC268 AC268 AC268 AC48I S16 AC261 Electronics AC207 ,AC207 AC207 AC48 S16 AC207 H Office equipment • S16 Light manufacturing,assembly, light finishing and warehousing of: Prefabricated parts and finished parts H207 H207 H207 H H207 I Manufacturing,processing of: Chemicals and allied products , S H I - I Manufacturing,processing,assembly of: Abrasive products P Airplanes SP Asphalt plants P - Automobiles . S P Boats P Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS USES: RC R-1 R-5 R-8 RMH R-10 R-14 RM IL IM IH CC CN CS CA CD CO COR ..CO MERCIAUI DUSTRIA C •>•- ...... , - Accessory structures AC93 AC44 AC44 Apparel, fabric and leather goods fabrication AC266 AC266 AC266 AC52 AC52 AC52 AC521 AC50 AC266 Caretaker's residence AC56 AC56 AC56 Computer and electronics assembly and packaging AC267 AC267 AC267 AC48I AC267 Electrical power generation and cogeneration AC213 Food preparation - S266 S266 S266 AC52 AC52 AC52 AC521 AC50 S266 AC50 Gatehouse or guardhouse AC58 AC58 Goods and materials associated with permitted use Handcrafting of items/products AC266 AC266 AC266 AC52 AC52 AC52 AC521 AC50 AC266 AC50 Hazardous waste treatment, on-site AC129 AC129 AC129 Manager's residence/office AC164 Restaurant, cafeteria, recreation facilities AC54 Retail uses associated with primary ro use AC49 S171 S171 Security building AC58 Storage of products in conjunction with retail sales AC267 AC267 AC267 AC48 AC48 AC48 AC481 AC50 AC267 AC50 Storage of supplies in conjunction with service and office uses AC267 AC267 AC267 AC48 AC48 AC48 AC48I AC50 AC267 AG. (Amd.Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999; Ord. 4803, 10-25-1999) - L. PUBLIC FACILITIES:...<, �.....: ..,......�<: .:..... ... ..:.......... . .....<.:.,.,..:<:>.. . � 4<..... ... ...... . <... .. . Government Government offices and facilities HHHHH H H H $ H HHHHH • H H H ♦i H Jails AD208 Post office substation P (Amd.Ord. 4786, 7-12-1999) Churches Churches, synagogues,temples I H I H I H I H IH IH IH IH IH IH I H IH I H 1-1-1 rH IH I H IH Blank=Not Allowed P=Primary Use S=Secondary Use AC=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use AD=Administrative Conditional Use H=Hearing Examiner Conditional Use #=Condition(s) X=Prohibited Specifically n c c v i . ` RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATIONS INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL ZONING,DESIGNATIONS USES: ' RC R-1 R-5 R'8 RK8H R-10 R-14 IL IK8 ]R CC CN LA� CD OR r - Minor modifications oa existing ' wireless communication facilities P243 P243 P243 F243 P243 ;243 P243 P243 P243 p243 r243 P243 P243 F243 F243 P243 P243 ;243 (Amd. Ord.478G. 7'12'1999) � Y .-'SCHOO B Educational institution (public or private) y H * H * n * H * * * * * H * H * .* School, elementary (exioUng) p P p p p p p P P p p p P p School, elementary (new) o40/ ' n x*o H * * * * * * * * * H * School, secondary (eniodng) p P P P 'p p p p p p p p p p School, secondary(navx) e4m ' - * *40 * H H H * y x H n a H * Portables (existing) p p p p p P p p p p p p p p Portables (new, uptofour) oi oi ei ni 'o1 oi o1 a175 ai n1 a1 oi a149 al- ChangoinuoohzrooiaUnQaohuo| * H H y H n * * H H H * H School expansion up to 10% pi pi P1 p1 p1 p1 p17e p1 p1 p1 P1 p1 p1 ` p1 School expansion more than 1O% y *40 e/1-140 H y * H H * * x n * * m Sohookxand studios for a¢ crafts, ' to' photography, n000 auso ncso au^ a84 o1 e84 n163 o` ' NF � Business and professional schools ��`- _ aun7 a207 ouor � p � p p m aou Vocational schools �74 p Spen�|schools:bnnhn�o0nduo� diu ' ' processes *eor *207 Hunr H School district Support facilities - p74 p | ( \nmd. Ord.47BG. 7-12-1099) | N�-'.-MXS�� FKC�� U� �88ENT��N�� - -- �- - - - ' | Changes in height, bulk Ao207 Ao207 Ao207 mz Existing proposed development / (prior O-PZone) p130 Heights exceeding the maximum - ' height of36'bv less than 20' Ao106 | Heights exceeding the maximum / i height of35'bvmore than10' H . Heights exceedingthe maximum height of46' n108 � � o|anx=mou/w|pwed p=p,maryuoo o=oennnuoryuse AC=uccoosoryuso T=7enmporaryune m Ao=Auminist,auvn�on�uiona|uoe *=nea,|ngsuumino,Conuuiona|us� #=oonuuinn(s) X=pn,mbuounpocmnaov ' ` � �� • • Webb,R.S.,and L.S.Forbes.1982. Colony establishment in an urban silt • by great blue herons. Mumdet 63(3)-.91-92. • Weredgrul.D.P.,fl.McMahon,and M.Leltschuh. 1976. Some ern human activities on the great blue heron in Oregon. Wilson S8(4)660-662. KEY POINTS: Habitat Requirements: • Colonial breeders,genendly nest in tali trees near wedands_ • • Usuidly forage within four-five bit of colony. • Alternate nesting and feeding habitat-important. • Sensitive to human distwbance.• . Managematt Reconunendations: • Maintain habitat within 250.350m buffer zone around colony. • No human histmaion in buffer zcxie between February 15 and July 31. • Maintain alternate nesting habitat nearby. • Protect wetlands and other feeding areas within four ion of colony_ • Develop 0 Site-specific management plan far each heronry(see tr..x0. • • • • • • C:T2127/91 ltlf • Suzanne Krom,President RECEIVED ( Citizens For Renton Wildlands Preservation 4715 1/2-36th Avenue SW MAY 1 1 2000 Seattle, WA 98 126-27 1 5 ECONEIGNOM DEVE OPMENT, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING May 10, 2000 City of Renton Planning Commission and City Council 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Testimony re Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone, project LUA-99-178-ECF,R Dear Commission and City Council members, Thank you for the opportunity to testify about the hillside adjacent to the Black River Riparian Forest, a wildlife sanctuary in Renton that has wide regional significance and strong public support. I write to you on behalf of the 350 members of Citizens For Renton Wildlands Preservation; an organization involved with the preservation of the Black River Riparian Forest since 1989. In addition to this testimony, please see our comment letter dated April 19, which you have in your file. We urge you to strongly consider the testimony from all participants at the May 3rd public hearing, and the letters from all those who have written to you, asking that you preserve the Black River Riparian Forest by denying the proposed multi-family housing rezone. This area is regionally recognized for the nesting colony of 100+Great Blue Herons and as one of the few remaining lowland riparian habitats in King County. This is not simply an issue about herons, as per Mayor Jesse Tanner's statement in the May 3rd issue of the Seattle Times, "We like herons, we think they're great, but there are other things in life besides herons."With all due respect for Mayor Tanner, I'd like to suggest that maybe these aren't just heron people talking about herons. If this was simply an issue about herons, you would not see the strong public support and concern for this site. This is about the quality of life in Renton --it is a neighborhood issue. It is also a regional issue. Also, according to the same Seattle Times article, Mayor Tanner said that the proposed rezone to Multi-Family Infill fits Renton's obligation to encourage urban living under the state Growth Management Act..I respectfully submit that Mayor Tanner's statement does not accurately reflect the GMA. Development of this environmentally sensitive hillside does not fit into the Growth Management Act. The GMA stipulates that environmentally critical areas such as steep slopes, wildlife corridors, streams, and wetlands, all or most of which exist on the subject hillside, should be protected when development is occurring within the Urban Growth boundary. The.regionwide significance of the Black River Riparian Forest is clear--you have witnessed an outpouring of public support for this site. People love this extraordinary place. If you have not yet seen it, you should. It is an experience of a lifetime. I am available and would like to introduce you to the Black River Riparian Forest. You will see baby herons and their parents, many other species of birds, indications of other animals that live at the site, and the astounding beauty of this protected sanctuary. And you will see people on the trail who love this site. Whenever I visit the site, I see 1 people on the trail --individuals, families, employees who work nearby, university and high school students conducting environmental research, schoolchildren on field trips to the site... People come here from all over the region to drink in the natural beauty and peace rarely found in an urban setting, and to use this rich place as a living laboratory for scientific research. There are not hordes of people on this trail, but individuals and small groups who know how to have little to no impact on this sensitive place. Another essential factor to consider is that most of the money used to acquire this sanctuary comes from regional money --King County Open Space Funds ($166,706.50), King County Conservation Futures Funds ($166,706.50), and Metro ($3.5 million)for remediation of its West Point wastewater treatment facility. This site was selected as one of the most significant sites in King County and deemed worthy of protection through acquisition. Why is this important? Because Ely development that occurs on the subject hillside, which is adjacent to the Black River Riparian Forest, has the strong likelihood of permanently damaging or destroying the protected Black River site below. It would be sad indeed if a development was allowed to take place that would permanently damage or destroy this sanctuary, and thus annul all the time, energy, and money that was put into protecting this area. Hydrologically,the hillside and the Black River Riparian Forest are fully and integrally connected. The wetlands are fed directly by the subject hillside. They fully depend on the groundwater and streams that run off this hillside. Any development will likely have severe impacts to this Riparian Forest in terms of water quality and hydrology. Add to this the impacts of far greater human use of the site, along with the use of fertilizers, pesticides,and herbicides and you can start to understand just how severe these impacts will be. Specifically, multi-family zoning should be denied due to its potential environmental harm in the following areas: • The nesting colony of Great Blue Heron is worthy of protection. Today many communities are working to create more wildlife/open space with a view to linkage. This already recognized protected area would be an enormous regional loss. • The use of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides for residential yards in a multi-family development has the strong potential of compromising the safety of the groundwater, potentially significantly affecting the wildlife below. • Intense population centers bring the demand for insect spraying, especially for mosquitoes. This would be potentially very damaging to the continued food chain for the fish (including chinook and coho salmon), birds, and the other wildlife that lives in the Black River Riparian Forest. • The multi-family use would cause more intense use of the Black River Riparian Forest,bringing the strong potential for future harm. • The railroad tracks that are directly below the proposed multi-family development appear to be used extensively. They present a serious safety hazard to children and others living above these tracks. subject hillside per SK • The ac4R4ve�R4paRaA-Forest consists of steep slopes, which show evidence of ongoing request • consistent landslides over hundreds of years, some of which appear to be very recent. It is easy 2 to see that the area is saturated with groundwater. Looking at the City's contour map, it appears that there is a high potential for the existence of numerous unmapped streams, which feed the wetlands, pond, and creek below where the herons, salmon, and other wildlife live and feed. The current proposal for multi-family apartments will likely have a major impact on the water table. • The potential for future landslides will likely increase with development. Due to the saturation of the ground and potential for slides, I would think this is an unsafe area in which to place development of any kind. Any proposed development should require a comprehensive EIS that addresses the following: • The scientific description of the water table. • A historic and scientific evaluation of past and future slide activity. • The relationship of development on the groundwater table. • The risk of development to the wildlife in the area, especially the Great Blue Heron. • The loss to the region of a known and highly valued wildlife sanctuary and open space. • The importance of the Black River Riparian Forest to migratory birds. The Black River Riparian Forest is an extraordinary place--one of the last best places in Puget Sound. It truly is a "shining star" for all of Puget Sound, and deserves to be protected for all of our children and grandchildren, forever. With the recent salmon listings and proposed.status review for the Great Blue Herons, we need to maintain the current low-risk approach to land use in this area. In weighing the interests of developers vs. preserving a site that has been purchased through regional funding, as well as preserving our natural heritage and a unique living laboratory, this should be a simple decision based on the site's merit and your public responsibility to Renton residents and the region. It is in your power to opt to protect and preserve Black River, a regionally recognized and beloved sanctuary. We are sure that you realize that what gets destroyed will never be there again. The City of Renton is to be commended for the current protections of the area. We urge you to deny the rezoning application, so that the herons and salmon can continue to be the Renton outdoor education link for the entire region. Residents of Renton and throughout the region will thank you for protecting the natural heritage we all share and for continuing what you have started to create, a Shining Star and regional destination attraction for Renton. Sincerely, Suzanne Krom 206-933-0222 cc:Ron Sims,KC Executive Dwight Pelz, KC District 5 r -Zti; �g�c Z, F��-t frC �-'"a�',� ',-.m' °rn.4 erg^ s. ; ��y7�`sa.L___ Ljtyd lJJ1 4.49 f nt l Q—CXi c44"' f?Judith Wright correction to testis -,.'letter(you'll receive inymail today) Page • From: <SzKrom@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/11/00 2:19AM Subject: correction to testimony letter(you'll receive in mail today) Hi Judy, Would you please make a correction to my letter,which you should be receiving in the mail today? I've attached a copy of the corrected letter. Here is the correction: Bottom of page 2: Correction: x The subject hillside consists of steep slopes, which show evidence of ongoing consistent landslides over hundreds of years, some of which appear to be very recent. .. Originally: x The Black River Riparian Forest consists of steep slopes,which show evidence of ongoing consistent landslides over hundreds of years, some of which appear to be very recent. Thank you. Suzanne Krom 206-933-0222 CC: <SzKrom@aol.com> • • CITY OF RENTON • MEMORANDUM DATE: August 28, 1992 TO: :!Arlene Haight, Property Management FROM: Marie Mosley, Fund Accounting Supervisor`110111,- SUBJECT: Black River Acquisition In response to your memo dated August 26th, I have attached the following schedule which Iwen prepared showing the distribution of funds for the Black River property acquisition. As you can see, the distribution was based on the total purchase price, not by individual parcel. The following summarizes Iwen schedule and is the actual cash.transfer that was prepared to fund the acquisition. The only item remaining to be charged is attorney fees, which will be done once we have all the costs. Description Fund Amount Metro Contribution 105 $3,500,000.00 Open Space Funds 302 166,706.50 Conservation Futures Funds 302 166,706.50 Insurance Fund 502 110,000.00 General Obligation Bond Proceeds 316 131,825.20 Transportation Funding 317 166,000.00 Total • $4,241,238.20 If you have any questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate to call me at extension 2614. cc: Dan Clements Iwen Wang • : : .: .: ::.:,:•:• .. ....Proper ty.;.::.;•;:•:,:.;Aerss;;....,. Cas h.::...::.:.�:LID/Note.;,fasinR:Cos:::::.:.: al.ue::.: :.:-:;TOT AL::::. >•: een"•:::::::;.: t rm:s::: Tran3Port.;.: P Pu`•s'�tigalitln >3iiiu n. • 11 GLACIER PARK . I - Parcel 1 24.28 50,000.00 228,715.03 87551 279,590.54 279,590.54 50,000.00 229,590.54 17125381-90 _ 13125381-0100 . 125381-0150 . • • 125381-0160 Parcel 3 3.75 25,000.00 0.00 135.22' 25,135.22 25,135.22 25,135.22 1125381-0230 Parcel 4 1059 25,000.00 0.00 381.87 25,381.87 25,381.87 25,381.87 125381-0170 125381-0220 Parcel13 48.10 100,000.00 112,507.53 L734.44 214,241.97 214,241.97 214,241.97 000580-0019 431 252304-9001 6.43 • 252304-9082 6.96 252304-9004(Part) 14.01 . 362304-9002(Part) 9.65 302305-9007 •• 3.24 252304-9019(Part) 3.50 Closing/Other Costs: Legal 0.00 • Closing . 3,127.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other • 0.00 - :.. :;•::-o-::. •<••::. ;::::.::..:::::::.:• .?RI.9229�.9054:nisi::.ii•:3>:: ?:z:::E::::< ;51:; ••< ..Glaeter..Patk:SubcToeaE;:::t:•:•: >S67Z::•;:,:•203;[?704•:.:34122256::;:3:1Z7:04_::•:544349:60 :::::s:544:349 b0.>;s::::«:::.s::::>260, 5 II _ PANTHER CREEK WETLANDS I ' Property Purchases 1923059016(Puget) - 1939 135,148.30 135,148.30 135,148.30 135,14830 3023059002(Puget) 10.46 72,906.20 . 72,906.20 72,906.20 72,906.20 3023059076(Puget) 537_ 37,428.90_ 37,428.90 37,428.90 37,428.90 ' 3023059107(Krebs) 0.10 717.91 717.91 717.91 717.91 3023059106(Chin) 037 2,557.99 2.557.99 2557.99 2557.99 3023059105(Clifford) 037 2,557.99 2557.99 2,557.99 2557.99 3023059025(Johnson) 0.44 3,038.92 • - 3,038.42 3,038.92 3,038.92 3023059050(Hawkins) 0:64 4,481.71 4,481.71 4,481.71 4,481.71 3023059016(Schultek) 1.50 10,455.00 10,455.00 10,455.00 10,455.00 3023059019(Tatra) 4.00 27,880.00_ 27,880.00 27,880.00 -27,880.00 3023059027(Pierotti) 3.19 22,234.30 22,234.30 22,234.30 - 22234.30 ' Closing/Other Costs: Legal 0.00 0.00 • Closing 0.00 0.00 Other • 0.00 0.00 Other000 0.00 0.00 •:GIr1:Suti-Total•:::::::.;.:.d5:83:rE?�Y>319407:22:. �.0:00:"'•: •.::0.00<.•:319;�40722 :E:'�319.40722" °�:::::.::.. .519:407:22 C':.`:::>: : :.?..-:.:.;.:::f•:::�:�s:;�r;::<>•.:;0.00?�:;�?:';'>: I Black River Acquisition 36.26 4,241.238.20 131,82520 0.00 166,000.00 333,413.00 3,500,000.0,0 110,000.00 Tract A 1,408,115.29 330,44241 676.25 1,739,233.95 .•0.00 . 'c ' Tract C 2.501.328.00 676.25 2,502,004.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - Legal , •' 0.00 0.00 Closing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 • !III ••':::r. aiiiii. •:::..:. •:::.:i::::::: :: -2�;::i:.:.;...,:::- • ".. ..s:...; •: • ' .::'• 1 00 333. 13.00 3500000.00..110. .00 .:Black:RtverAcquuttitfn:•:�:•;:<::•:36:7b:.::3,909,443:29" :330.d4241^:s::1;352:50<47it12'f8:20 ::.4:2d1238:20 :Tat;82£"20:.<:��-;i':� U:OO s:: 66000: :::� '4:?' s3. .:.II I I f • ':''•r:<TOTAL's'AL:Is:P.ROBEAfIX:::•132 55:$i a:i431'9.7:T b5' 6.7.;664:97:::::4 4.79.54.. <*.863;756.82':'•:•863,756.82 395:590541:�333 415,00 3 550;512 09•••:110.,000.00 „tip , W e'11 L1s •tirt if.Cd, ' , l A.0 r -vlµ Q (eI,:zt .w K ‘,kw1 . i b .A-is . uy1( b . ( - ` cl-t . (A)-e - 7605 South 128th Street Seattle, WA 98178 RECEIVED 9 May, 2000 MAY 1 1 2000 Mr. Larry Brosman ECONOMIi EVE OPMENT, City Planning Commission AND STRATEGIC PLANNING Renton City Hall 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Brosman: I live in unincorporated King County, along the Renton border. I do all my business in Renton, supporting Fred Meyer, etc. I am writing to you to ask you to strongly reject the city of Renton's recent plan for development. As you know,the city is advocating rezoning an area close to the 93-acre Black River Riparian Forest. There is a proposed plan to build 200-250 apartments along Martin Luther King Way South on a very steep slope that is also in close proximity to a heron rookery that is the home of—45 nests. I attended the Planning Commission's meeting one week ago and heard testimony after testimony on what a valuable resource this rookery is to the city of Renton. I too take my out-of-town guests to this beautiful area located practically in our backyard as well as find weekly solace in walking the trail. I do not understand how the city can even consider such a development request,much less advocate for its passage. I am a high school biology teacher with expertise in the field of environmental science. I have several questions regarding this project: 1. Why hasn't an Environmental Impact Statement been done? 2. If any kind of development is done,what will happen to the runoff from parking lots and lawns? Any fertilizers, pesticides, or parking lot runoff will adversely effect the Black River Riparian Forest groundwater, and consequently any living thing dependent on that habitat. 3. If this area was rejected for development 3 years ago,why is it now being pushed for approval? 4. This area is not yet in the city of Renton boundaries...why is Renton making the decision? I would like you to consider what a resource this actually is: this IS a reason to visit Renton and to experience beauty and wildness that the great blue heron and its habitat inspire. Please do all you can to conserve this beautiful area...favoring development will doom this truly unique resource. If Renton truly is "ahead of the curve",here is a chance to demonstrate a long term planning strategy that places value on what little green space and untouched habitat is left. Once we lose it, it cannot be replaced. Sincerely, LVq Mary P. arsh HECEI MAY 1/ 20 00 ND GNBAS G ENT, RATEGlc p�Ae�i; Mr. Larry Brosman, Chair Renton Planning Commission 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: Project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Mr. Brosman: • The following is the text of an e-mail I previously sent to you on May 2, 2000. I will not be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, but I would like to express my support for the objections of Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation,the Seattle Audubon Society and the Rainier Audubon Society to rezoning the hillside adjacent to the Black River heron colony for higher density. I strongly urge you to recommend that the current zoning by retained,thus avoiding the substantial detrimental effect which the proposed rezoning could have on this shining example of preservation within our growing urban area. The City of Renton should be commended for what it has been able to achieve with this project, in cooperation with citizens'groups. Please don't let this valuable resource go the way of so many other natural habitats that have been squeezed out by urban growth. I have been to this heron colony. It's an amazing place. While I was there, it was not only the splendid herons that impressed me. I met a family who came there often and whose children knew all about the herons,their habitat and the Native American ruins nearby. This place is a treasure and should be preserved so that the fruits of the cooperation and work of the City of Renton and all those who have been dedicated to preserving this site will also be preserved. Thank you for your consideration. kA-J2eL--- 0. it Vb Linda Radoff 6550- 1st Ave. N.W. Seattle, WA 98117-4285 206-789-0349 Irrad@juno.com From:James L Davis To:Renton Planning Commision uate:onutuu lime:z:ua:uz rm rage I or • nECE May 9, 2000 MAY I ED Y 2000 ECONE GIB EVECOP ChLair, Renton Planning Commission AND STRArEGRCPON NG 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 RE: LUA-99-178, ECF, R I have been interested in the heron colony and wildlife habitat at the Black River for many years now. This is such a valuable area for wildlife. It is also a valuable site for the citizens of Renton, King County, and other places. I now live over on the Olympic Peninsula. I regularly tell people here about the Black River colony and how the city of Renton has preserved the area. I urge them to visit the Black River. It is one of the few colonies that is accessible and easy to view. I have studied heron colonies here on the Peninsula and find that all the colonies are difficult to get to and difficult to view without disturbing the herons. The City of Renton has done an excellent job in protecting these birds and the habitat. I • urge the Planning Commission to vote against the multi-family rezoning proposal. Sincerely, Trudy Davis P.O. Box 2014 Port Townsend WA 98368 • • ) t"'cq-?1?‘ `It at4A r ,,,,,(42"r2 —,. s ‘,0-" j -)",-. . -2't( el.., )40 - . ir 5� - Ufa y 7 � S ' . z ,,_,,�, 9 7 H"�o �aI + alb' A 0-a5Jue 'l' - �I a � no jc1 ")3 S �oA3Jo ,vd to yam? 1' alb1, ,ow✓a bC1 t� I - F � ,o) ' v- ( I 1.).30 , t,, ►-o5 r tkfT - , 5 ,,� � � y� �b a.b o 2J C'� f- ('514cv?H (fin bay 0 0�� ?loC>.� any/ ' >i `J�� Fi'��` b��n`7 a4 00 4 l^bA4co�C \iltJ J'�� . m co, Glitwo' s .�-5Q NZz 3 xi- ircT,i �o vi tiro o 1.93. • RI . c 'IPIAbili) m 2' m �O IA Ina 91J n :i 43 i m QI C V `7 t`7 t' CAVE® 6-83y 0. 7.4 si iitio/ . MAY 1 0 2000 Seca Secat4, t1,ll 9gl1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, /n_q/ V NEIGHBORHOODS, ` U AND STRATEGIC PLANNING fv(- p/ai Cad y Park,,, leYi.5- v 1 ✓Q to an , i'4 1 ?6,5 eoYi &mint 1(4),(46, comp reivdd, pki a yrundwaiat fc'e%30,442. Pro e J4 - 404 99-f1? CCPl g. , /a ,, , / _ dkA6 04.)- 54./296 imeez. /,,,4,..„ z...--,7*,_ d, Q/f.,.,ot.. 4 Ga4e71 al 7?-1,57e. 6004 440 --ag, c1.4:6-t. - 4 rie-, jxezie ,,,,,,,,L, 40 G , P2djGexed y s=-�.,1 cenlp/ e_ > 1e /0/aqie. dgifel al, ./zi45,.., , So<ptL rx, . /� � . ffe, .- 4/v6,1 0 C e p Are.kfruriVe-- //a li 4na-nale"041.1 ire 2o"..51, - . RF-06714..0„41 _ • ia.,e, /fer4i,,i.e/>47r ‘011444i,(44,-Aftc-- _ MAY 1 0 2000 -----ac_ Whal/v' AL-'911 C '(4 Al'Afil4=,:; , 07....e.....- _ A cst,,_ 7:::e ci„r , re.„7/ccer.„.-e.c.__•76/ ),i-• Lik tvacee-eid— • c, s6ria..6, .(,); ek pa-1 et 6t,taeA 6J .JeA.01-66 /ce-yel 40-r-t/ -Th 6--P41, .-AeS 6el _,a4--- X -CeA2- , Range Bayer (541-265•..,,..5) email: rbayer@orednet.org P. O. Box 1467, Newport, OR 97365 RECEIVED MAY 1 0 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING 6 May 2000 Planning Commission City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Dear Sir or Madam: Re: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone; project no. LUA-99-178, ECF, R. I am very concerned that the proposed rezone to Multi-Family housing near the Black River Riparian Forest will be very detrimental to the fish and wildlife in the Riparian Forest. Renton is fortunate to have the Riparian Forest that includes a Great Blue Heron colony--it would be a shame to lose this treasure. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours, Range Bayer RECEIVED MAY 1 0 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBOHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING 22826 105th Ave. S.W. Vashon, WA 98070 May 9, 2000 Planning Commission City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Members of the Commission: Having been involved since about 1989 with the ongoing efforts to protect the Black River heronry, I am very much concerned about the proposed rezoning of the adjacent hillside. I write to add my voice to the voices of those who share this concern. The propose rezoning to multi-family housing would substantially increase the impacts on the wildlife protected in the heronry. The additional numbers of people, who would be arriving and leaving at all hours of the day and night, would be onerous, but perhaps the most significant impact could come from pets. The addition of dogs and cats to this wildlife area would jeopardize habitat for many species. I realize that the City of Renton has already expended effort to protect the heronry, but the valuable asset the City and the environmentalists have worked to preserve is best protected by a low-risk approach to land-use and development in the area. I urge the City to reassess its options and allow only less intrusive development on the hillside. Sincerely, Susan McClellan o0 HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Bank of America Bldg. (425)454-8272 davidhalinen@halinenlaw.com 10500 NE 81,Suite 1900 Fax(425)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 • May 3, 2000 HAND-DELIVERED City of Renton Department of Economic Development and Neighborhood Strategic Planning 1055 S. Grady Way, Sixth Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Rebecca Lind, Principal Planner RE: Merlino SR 900 Property Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment City of Renton File No. LUA 99-178, ECF,R,CPA (00T4) Dear Ms. Lind: On behalf of the applicants, I am writing concerning the April 5, 2000 Staff proposal for alternate language to the Applicant's proposed amendment to Policy LU-69. The Staff proposal seems to the to be unnecessarily complicated. Perhaps the objectives that Staff seeks to meet could be attained by simply modifying the Applicants' originally proposed one-sentence amendment to read as follows: (Application of this designation to properties that both lie between and connect to parcels that have this designation need not be considered an inappropriate "expansion"but, rather, an acceptable"infill".) Please further consider this matter. Thank you for your assistance. Please phone me if you have any questions. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. • David L. Hali en Cc: Donald J. Merlino Gary Merlino Tom Warren,Trammel Crow Residential Judith Wright- LUA-99-178 ECF R - -- Page From: "Jim Davis" <ilwu21@olympus.net> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/9/00 1:51PM Subject: LUA-99-178, ECF, R I am writing in regards to the proposed rezoning of property adjacent to the Black River Riparian Forest and Wetland. I have been interested in the heron colony and wildlife habitat at the Black River for many years now. This is such a valuable area for wildlife. It is also a valuable site for the citizens of Renton, King County, and other places. I now live over on the Olympic Peninsula. I regularly tell people here about the Black River colony and how the city of Renton has preserved the area. I urge them to visit the Black River. It is one of the few colonies that is accessible and easy to view. I have studied heron colonies here on the Peninsula and find that all the colonies are difficult to get to and difficult to view without disturbing the herons. The City of Renton has done an excellent job in protecting these birds and the habitat. I urge the Planning Commission to vote against the multi-family rezoning proposal. Sincerely, Trudy Davis P.O. Box 2014 Port Townsend WA 98368 CC: <tomnyari@aol.com>, <jwholmes00@aol.com>, <szkrom@aol.com> Judith Wright-LUA-99-178,ECF, R Paget'1 From: <Ahhmusic@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/9/00 6:08PM Subject: LUA-99-178,ECF, R I wish to object to yet another case of screw the environment and make it possible for some already wealthy developers to line their pockets with even more big bucks at everyone elses'expense. The proposed developers obviously are not taking into consideration the effect their money-making plans will have on our environment. Already the rich developers have depleted the natural areas involved in mud slide and flood prevention, wildlife preservation and areas for enjoyment of the general public to a point where the results show up with every storm. The people who are harmed by this thoughtless overdevelopment turn out not to be the developers. They have long ago gone home to a safer place to count their money. Come on. For heaven sakes, isn't anyone watching out for the public good. Isn't that what your jobs are, not giving in to more high-priced homes no one can afford anyway. Jane Anne Haworth 14449 127th Land NE, S-26 Kirkland WA 98034-1239 ahhmusic@aol.com Judith Wright- Project#LUA99-178,ECF" __.. .._.. ___...__.._.m_. ._ _.e .__. '" _...._,___.. Page 1 From: "Doug Anderson" <dandersonz@earthlink.net> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/9/00 7:59PM Subject: Project# LUA-99-178, ECFR To: Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission Subject: Project No. LUA-99-178, ECF, R I went to the hearing at City hall on May 3 because I like and appreciate the herons. When I looked over the proposal and saw that Gary Merlino is the developer, I knew I had to collect my thoughts and write this message. I want to tell you about a construction project Gary Merlino did in our neighborhood in West Seattle. Ecology blocks were dumped on the beach, well outside the natural high tide line and in total disregard of the Shoreline Management Act. When the neighbor to the south complained about boulders and ecology blocks and a boat ramp on the beach and obstruction of view by a future wall, Gary Merlino reportedly said, 3You can* t fight me, I* ve got lawyers.* The neighbor did sue and won. When I called the City of Seattle DCLU to find out the project status, one worker said 3How would you like to have someone come in yelling and pounding on your desk every day?* To make a long story short, the city made him take out the ecology blocks on the beach and shorten the wall and boat ramp. You see, this construction was his home. This demonstrates that Gary Merlino violates legal restrictions to build what he wants to build the way he wants to build it, even at the cost of alienating his neighbors. On the Renton project, at the hearing I heard a neighbor adjacent to the Renton property say that he was still waiting for a fence that Gary Merlino promised to build. I urge the neighbors to get organized if they want to have promises kept. Should you let this project proceed, tell the city inspectors to get sturdy desks and ear plugs, and to think about working weekends. Before you let someone destroy the heron habitat you* ve already spent$8 million to preserve, please think about what future generations will say about Renton Planning Commission members. Think about the opportunity you have here to protect a unique and wonderful place. You are the caretakers. Anne Noonan 9823 51st Ave. SW Seattle, WA 98136 206-935-6021 (home) 206-935-6335 (work) . i R CEI D _ l'i , 7 • .,_ . MAY 9 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, ....' AND STRATEGI NNIN .... ,. ._ ...„65...42....u. ..e...,L.0 , • ....-' . .._. . , ,___ 'i ... •-41/44":41^41-; el4/' : ' ot.„.67 — , . .. . . . . •;• ' r - ;•7"tt ri:LL • . • . ' -±L-Q, .. •; • . . • - 4 . . . . . . . .. . _ .. . I •..,. -:S.: ..q D 6 : .,._ . . .• . .._ . . -• a..-,,fa, c ;:._:, •_ .- - lb 1 151.::6-12,-4-- 1 . .. , -.- -.- . .-)L--L,. .:•-" .a-4-,e---12-- i -1 ,,-(2- • , `. .t, ,-Q- • Al :C4`1`L'A4b2.4/ • .: - . . -• - ... i .1.1) • . . . . ..• • . f • .... . • . • • - •. - .`•'•A -- • ... I.A.JLNI* ..144 ). ,,• 0. ' ' • • • •••• • • r 7 1 A j L*7 7.•' CP -.'‘'...Ir' L1.4.1 . ,),.+, • - " 1 ' • , .• . . . . 4",---- al-Q- ---t-• . 1 i. # 1 .1 ,_,12..!q•-e,-i,r1," • __ __. .71---6--a-e-- -..)• - LA I r-k.52--/-4- -'-- if.•-_-4--v•-e_____ . A I.1 ). • . • _ _ • .. __ - 1-) ...j . ___ . eULI-'1Z-1--- I , „, illi ... t I - Ir ......1 : 1 . . 11 ..c).. / j- k.a.' • •- ••• - . / C9'AtNIAW -.. .6.^0\1- __.__: • 7•00t - . - ,.. -C•V±CL" .11440 0 . .... - ' leir) : ‘LJ-J241 a .1 . --. ! V • . • "C 1 ' • CL) tjtL) ,tt/ L, . . . .4±•Al i .: .. ,? R ±LA±'-._.±L A*'. . - . . • • ,. . — • ... .- ..-, .- `-.A.t •• I1..% • • I e ._ 4.: . . -.' ' • 7bt - - - c ) 0 , .ri olk_r_.....)• i i J2---" ii- -e--.9--iL .- l.-12)7---4- 1A-e:•' • . • • 1 .. .. -1*T"td"--11 *-----• n--) 4---I5— ik- ± • • , e JA^4s-- LL-A-1=1 • ._ .. C.,tet,1.--L;- . . • - . . . • -.it41- .. . ,. - . ,r... . \ . . . • -.IL . . . __ „ s ,.__. , \ . • .. • '...rj1.11 r . - , \ lam. . I t s., t ... . ....... .. , 4 1 kr) i ... . ,... ......... ....... ... .. ii:‘,,c.. ' ... -1111 ....., ,.• ... i 1‘ . . . . . ,.... . 1 .... .. ... :..;.. . •...:,:--1: 10 . - • • ,.. - : ... 1 7''' "•••• . ill . . -;- i..;' ,.. ,-....,. •'_: -.: , . .. • ..t__... , 4 It • •; '..:.1,. . V „ . ' : • 2 .. .. .4.,____ i .. . . . • ,. _ .. ,........ .......• 1 • ''...".., ,,, ':, , - .. A . I' 7 • • .. • .. , . ._, .. ... .. , . . v . Lc; 1 1 I ... .14. . . . . ip . . , ,,,,,,,,,. . ' ....... , i. ... , ' ...11.. 1, . ., . i ' 411•14 . /.-..N . _ . ... . i . ... ,. . , \ 1 1 i . 7i 1.4j I ', ‘‘ 't....•• :. . . ' .- i . ,, .' :f2: . --Zi........:.`'• ..N1:1 7• ;• ,:). . . . i. . • 41 . .. ...... . . .., I. . .. .. i . • . 1 , NNW i . .. • i. • • •. t...._."•. . •, 47•••,,li, . . • -. ,- • - . ..... 1 773- -.••••- ' . . .. ,. . , .. - .--1 .....:- .• . i , • , . . . . , . . . . • . .... . . . . !. . . . . . .• _ . . • .. . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . • . . . . . . , . . . .. . • .. . , . . , . , , • • . . RECEI"F 0 - May 7, 2000 MAY 9 2000 ECONOMIC DEVL,.... Larry Brosman NEIGHBOP.HOOD AND STRATEGIC. PLANNING Chair, Renton Planning Commission 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: LUA-99-178,ECF, R. Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Dear Mr. Brosman: Thank you for your participation in the Renton Planning Commission. I am writing to follow up an earlier e-mail (enclosed) and my testimony at your public hearing on Wednesday. I appreciate that the Commission members attentively listened to the remarks that were presented at the hearing. I also appreciate that in 1997 the Commission recommended a less intensive designation for the disputed area than even CA or RM-I. I trust that all of you have been to the site with good binoculars and have an appreciation of how special this place is, both for the heron rookery and the natural setting, and for the historical significance of the Black River. As I said in my testimony, I bring visitors here from Renton, Seattle, other cities and other countries. Their jaws drop at the site of the rookery. Please do not approve the requested rezone for all the reasons stated at the hearing. In addition, I don't understand why Renton doesn't more fully appreciate and embrace the natural features it encompasses. In Portland, there is a huge mural of a great blue heron and I believe there is still a Blue Heron ale distributed there. Issaquah hosts its Salmon Days which highlights the salmon returning there each year. In late fall, Renton has the bright red Sockeye swimming right through downtown in the Cedar River. And it has this marvelous heron rookery. While nature is unpredictable, and we can't know if there will always be a heron rookery or salmon, I would strongly recommend that Renton enhance its reputation and image by celebrating these natural and unique features. Thank you again for listening to these comments. Best wishes, C. OJL Didi Catherine Anstett P O Box 17023 Seattle, WA 98107 206-784-7828 • Subj: Black River-proposed development Date: 4/27/00 3:23:01 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: DIDIANSTET To: Jwright@ci.renton.wa.us CC:Tomnyari, SzKrom, Donorman To the City of Renton and the Renton City Council: The Great Blue Heron rookery in the Black River Riparian Forest is one of the most unique and special places in the Seattle area. Historically, it preserves a tiny remnant of the drainage of the Sammamish and Lake Washington watersheds that existed prior to the installation of the Hiram Chittenden Locks. It is a real eye opener for people to view this area and understand how significantly the Locks have affected the ecosystem in our area. While we have nearly eliminated the Black River, we still have a chance to save another aspect of what makes the spot so special. One can walk into the trail in the greenspace and view one of the largest heron rookeries in the area. Kate Stenberg of the King County Wildlife Program advises that 40% of the rookeries in the Puget Sound area were abandoned during the nesting season in 1999, so this habitat is becoming increasingly precious. Herons have wing-spans of 6 feet and are quite beautiful. When I bring visitors to this area, they are awed by the herons and the nesting colony. I feel privileged that the herons still choose to nest in our urban areas. And I'm so pleased that we haven't completely obliterated their habitat. But it seems we're getting close to doing just that. I have brought visitors to the rookery ranging from teenagers to people in their 80's. I have brought visitors from the Eastside, Renton, Seattle, and from other states. I also bring people from other countries, visitors at the International Hostel. For all of them, it takes their breath away, and gives an image of Renton that they would not have expected. It surprises them that just minutes from a bustling area, you can be in nature, unaware that you are in the middle of an urban area, and viewing these amazing creatures. Thank you for your past role in protecting the portion of this greenspae that has been purchased for permanent preservation. However, more needs to be done at this time. While the herons nest in the tops of the trees, they also spend time along the shores of the pond. A large apartment complex, its residents and their pets, would have a serious impact on the area. Please,consider how special this area is, and how it needs to be protected as you deliberate any requests for rezones or permits for construction on adjoining property. Sincerely, Didi Catherine Anstett P O Box 17023 Seattle, WA 98107 206-784-7828 didianstet@aol.com Sunday,May 07,2000 America Online:DIDIANSTET Page:1 5 May 2000 RECEIVED MAY 9 2000 ECONOMIC EIGHBORHO ODS ENT, Chairman Larry Brosman AND STRATEGIC PLANNING Renton Planning Commission 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Project #LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Mr. Brosman: Thank you for allowing us to participate in the discussion concerning the heron colony along the Black River. We have thought about this and discussed among friends the possible scenario with the development of new high density dwellings along this hillside. We believe that everything possible should be done to preserve the present condition as we fear coexistence will not be possible considering the delicate nature of nesting for this particular bird. The information we are receiving recently concerning herons is that they arenewly threatened by the resurgence of the bald eagles who prey on their nesting young. As much as we appreciate the return of the bald eagle and all that entails, we can only consider that the herons already have predators in place that might cause their demise in this particular location, without people to crowd around their habitat. We have news from Arizona that the people there are loving the owls to death in.the Chiracahua Mountains. We have enjoyed the wildlife in Arizona but can foresee the time when restrictions might need to be placed. What the herons need here is room to nest and thrive without the threat of more bodies thrusting in on them.' What no one. wishes to acknowledge is that our area has reached a density of population now that will continue to cause social and wildlife problems of a difficult nature as we suffer continued abuse through crowding and impossible traffic situations. We appreciate the City of Renton's .actions in decreasing the Canadian goose population. Those birds were more of a problem at Gene Coulon Park than the many people who try to enjoy the waterfront and lovely walking path. The herons have no chance of becoming such a threat. Mr. Larry Brosman 5 May 2000 Page 2 Please do not send me any meeting notices as we have our hands full attending King County meetings regarding the erosion and devastation of Madsen Creek behind our. property. This problem is a direct result of over-development and over-use of our area. Thank God the King County powers that be have been successful in purchasing additional buffer property for this creek and are working diligently to restore (as much as possible) this creek to some kind of viable situation. It begs immediate attention as well and we are committed to help them find options to help us find a solution that will satisfy all needs and prevent further million dollar lawsuits against King County. Of course, our taxes are a persecution, as are the results of poor past planning before our time. Therefore, I ask your indulgence and apologize for such a long-winded dissertation. You are sure to be cognizant of and sympathetic with the position of the herons and I need no reassurance from you on that, but if the citizens.of. Renton and surrounding areas can be made aware of the monetary needs of such preservation, I am sure we can come up with an appropriate solution. Thank you once again for making the opportunity available to us for input on this matter. Sincerely, titu 4,1136 151s" —..--I e. Clara N. Green . . ,.,1 4/4- qSos- . cc: Helen Ross, Seattle Audubon Conservation Coordinator • RECEIVED May 6, 2000 MAY 8 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Renton Planning Commission NGHBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING 1055 South Grady Way. Renton, Wa 98055 Attn: Larry Brosman RE: LUA-99-178, ECF, R Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone On May 3rd, 2000 I attended a Planning Commission Public Hearing regarding the Merlino Rezone and was very pleased to see so many people concerned and willing to stand up and speak out on behalf of the Herons. We are a community that is aware and a community that cares about the quality of life for its citizens and its environment. I am submitting this letter to urge the Renton City Council to vote NO on the Merlino REZONE. Regarding the Merlino Comprehensive Plan Rezone, I understand why the owner is pushing for the more lucrative "Multi-family"rezone; the rights of private ownership and human greed dictate that it is the only natural course of action for the owner. I believe, however, that the City Council and the Planning Commission MUST be driven by a completely different set of criteria. The Council MUST place the greater good above corporate greed and a healthy environment above private ownership. Years of hard work by a group of dedicated volunteers and the investment by the City itself of time, money and resources have made the Black River Wetlands a cherished and important part,of the community. It would be unthinkable to now watch the City sabotage its own efforts to protect and enhance this environmentally significant area. Lets continue to work TOGETHER to protect and preserve the Black River Riparian Forest. It is a rare jewel in a city that is overdeveloped and under appreciated. I beg the City of Renton and challenge this government to act with great compassion and courage and to stand up and do the right thing for the citizens of this community and most importantly for future generations. I urge you to take your children and your grandchildren and go walk the quiet and peaceful road along the Black River. Walk with the herons and really take the time to listen and see what an amazing gift the City of Renton has been given. It'is a small road, not heavily traveled and yet one of magnificent beauty. As you walk ask yourself, If I have the courage and foresight to vote NO on this REZONE will there be other opportunities to build multi-family housing?Yes. Are there less environmentally sensitive areas where this type of building would be more appropriate?Absolutely. But if I vote yes on this rezone will we be able to relocate this wetland, and will these beautiful birds be able to find a new home or will they be pushed into oblivion and ultimately extinction? It is never easy to take stand, to face a challenge head on and to find the courage necessary to vote for the greater good and not the lesser. I beg the City Council.to walk this road less traveled. Please make a difference in our community and VOTE NO on the REZONE. "I shall be telling this with a sigh Somewhere ages and ages hence: Two roads diverged in a wood, and I-- I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference." Robert Frost Nancy Thomson aiz-cy 12500 - SE 100th Street Renton, WA 98056 425-255-0733 :Judith Wright- Re: Great blue herons refur,- LUA-99-178, ECF, R Page iw From: 'Bob Green" <brgreen@email.msn.com> To: "Judith Wright" <Jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/8/00 1:32PM Subject: Re: Great blue herons refuge- LUA-99-178, ECF, R Judith: I cannot thank you enough for your prompt response to my E mail about the herons. I have written a letter to Mr. Brosman listing my concerns in this regard. It is very considerate of your group to solicit our input and I do appreciate all you have done to maintain and control the wonderful wildlife we have so close to all our dwellings and offices. However, I shall not be able to participate much in the ongoing process as we are involved in trying to help King County people decide how best to preserve the Madsen Creek that runs behind our property. This will involve several meetings this summer and my attention will be diverted from herons to that, as it is closer to home at this point. We feel exceedingly fortunate to live in such a grand environment which attracts all kinds of wildlife and hope to preserve it for posterity as long as possible and as long as we are able to pay property taxes in this region. Best wishes for an outcome from which all can benefit. And thank you again for your time on this as I know it is a lengthy process to try to satisfy all requirements. Sincerely, Clara Green t=Judith Wright-RE: Please preserve Black p',,er........_. .._.. ....._... Page 1 From: "Wilson, Nancy L" <Nancy.Wilson@PSS.Boeing.com> To: 'Judith Wright"' <Jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/8/00 7:24AM Subject: RE: Please preserve Black River Judith, here is my address: Nancy Wilson 2861 SW 171st Street Burien, WA 98166 > From: Judith Wright[SMTP:Jwright@ci.renton.wa.us] > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 9:13 AM >To: Nancy.Wilson@pss.boeing.com >Subject: Re: Please preserve Black River >We have received your e-mail regarding the Comprehensive Plan Amendment#2000-M-6 &T-4. In order for you to become a party of record,we need your name and complete mail address. Once we receive this information, your name will be included as a party of record and you will receive any further notices of upcoming meetings relating to the Comp Plan Amendments. The public written comment period will remain open until 5:00 p.m.Wednesday, May 10th. > If you have any questions, you may call Strategic Planning at (425)430-6575. > >>> "Wilson, Nancy L" <Nancy.Wilson@PSS.Boeing.com> 05/02/00 07:54AM >>> >To the Renton Planning Commission and City Council: > > I work in the city of Renton and am a long time,frequent visitor to the Black River forest. More recently, I have volunteered to help monitor success of the Great Blue Heron nests adjacent to the forest. > Please add my voice to the litany of those opposed to the rezoning of the adjacent hillside. The proposed higher density development will surely threaten and harm this unique and fragile ecosytem, undoing eleven years of hard work by the City of Renton and Seattle Audobon Society's Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation. >Sincerely, > Nancy Wilson > (206)244-9504 (h) > (425)234-2453 (w) > ith Wright ONE ~-_'--_-- �-_'____-'-_'-_ _-_-'--' -_ _-_------_ _' -_~ _ _-��'`~ ^ From: <TLkANU@kun.cum> To: <Jvvhoht@c.renton�a.un> Date: 5/8/007:03AM Subject: Re: Protect the Great Blue Herons: OO NOT REZONE Thank you. |would like to become"party ofraoord" |would prefer any notices hobe sent via email ONLY bo save paper. Thank you. TommyLionu 11025SVV338th8t Vaohon. VVA08O70 ' ' Judith Wright- NO to LUA-99-178, ECF, P ""erlino Comp PlanAmendment Rezone Page 1 From: <DIDIANSTET@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/7/00 1:04PM Subject: NO to LUA-99-178, ECF, R. Merlino Comp Plan Amendment Rezone Below is a copy of a letter I have mailed today to the Planning Commission: May 7, 2000 Larry Brosman Chair, Renton Planning Commission 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Re: LUA-99-178, ECF, R. Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Dear Mr. Brosman: Thank you for your participation in the Renton Planning Commission. I am writing to follow up an earlier e-mail (enclosed) and my testimony at your public hearing on Wednesday. I appreciate that the Commission members attentively listened to the remarks that were presented at the hearing. I also appreciate that in 1997 the Commission recommended a less intensive designation for the disputed area than even CA or RM-I. I trust that all of you have been to the site with good binoculars and have an appreciation of how special this place is, both for the heron rookery and the natural setting, and for the historical significance of the Black River. As I said in my testimony, I bring visitors here from Renton, Seattle, other cities and other countries. Their jaws drop at the site of the rookery. Please do not approve the requested rezone for all the reasons stated at the hearing. In addition, I donrcOt understand why Renton doesnrcOt more fully appreciate and embrace the natural features it encompasses. In Portland, there is a huge mural of a great blue heron and I believe there is still a Blue Heron ale distributed there. Issaquah hosts its Salmon Days which highlights the salmon returning there each year. In late fall, Renton has the bright red Sockeye swimming right through downtown in the Cedar River. And it has this marvelous heron rookery. While nature is unpredictable, and we canrcOt know if there will always be a heron rookery or salmon, I would strongly recommend that Renton enhance its reputation and image by celebrating these natural and unique features. Thank you again for listening to these comments. Best wishes, Didi Catherine Anstett P 0 Box 17023 Seattle, WA 98107 206-784-7828 dith S___ _�._ _ _ Paoe1 . From: @ao.com> To: <Jvvhght@ci.rentonma.us» Date: 5/7/008:24PM Subject: Re: BLUE HERONS H[ |just wanted to give you my name and address as you had asked. K4y name is Emily Hamel and my address io 4702 Davis Avenue South#2F303 Ranton.VVo 98055 Thank you for responding bornyLetter, Emily Hamel Judith UVright-µMerlirio Comprehensive Ph^ °mendment Rezone Page„1 • From: <User329505@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/5/00 11:15PM Subject: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Renton Planning Commission - I support the Friends of the Black River in their effort to ensure that the Merlino SR-900 property is developed responsibly. Being a member of the Rainier Audubon Society, I feel this area is crucial for the herons and other wildlife. The current proposal for multifamily apartments will have a major impact on the heron colony. The City of Renton should continue to protect this place from high-impact, high-density development, which would destroy it and its wildlife inhabitants. Please make sure that development of this area is done responsibly! Thank you, Susan Minerich 4,-:)476 G2&2 ��✓ Gd6 5d70-t? CaS3� 630-0799 From: <BPbatfan@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/4/00 7:17AM Subject: Blue Heron Colony Dear Renton Planning Commission members, I cannot attend your meeting, but wanted to contact you about Project# LUA-99-178, ECF,R. I ask that you please do not rezone the property near your city's true gem, the Black River Slough, and its Blue Heron Rookery. Building apartments there would so negatively affect one of the last and best remaining areas for wildlife in this region. Please leave the zoning as it is. As a school teacher in Highline School District, I can tell you that this area has been a valuable nearby"classroom"for teaching a great variety of science and environmental units. What a shame it would be to damage or lose this area, for the plants and wildlife residing there, and for the children who study and learn there. Sincerely, Barbara Petersen 30902 5th Way So. Federal Way, WA 98003 ea 0, lot HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Bank of America Bldg. (425)454-8272 davidhalinen@halinenlaw.com 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(425)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 May 3, 2000 HAND-DELIVERED City of Renton Depaitiiient of Economic Development and Neighborhood Strategic Planning 1055 S. Grady Way, Sixth Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Rebecca Lind, Principal Planner RE: Merlino SR 900 Property Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment City of Renton File No. LUA 99-178, ECF,R,CPA(00T4) Dear Ms. Lind: On behalf of the applicants, I am writing concerning the April 5, 2000 Staff proposal for alternate language to the Applicant's proposed amendment to Policy LU-69. The Staff proposal seems to me to be unnecessarily complicated. Perhaps the objectives that Staff seeks to meet could be attained by simply modifying the Applicants' originally proposed one-sentence amendment to read as follows: (Application of this designation to properties that both lie between and connect to parcels that have this designation need not be considered an inappropriate "expansion"but, rather, an acceptable"infill".) Please further consider this matter. Thank you for your assistance. Please phone me if you have any questions. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. • David L. Hali en Cc: Donald J. Merlino Gary Merlino Tom Warren, Trammel Crow Residential Judith,Wright- BLUE HERONS m _. ...._._._. ... _._.._. _.,.. ... .__. . .. .a Pa Page 1 From: <ChickenAngel@aol.com> To: <sdenison@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/3/00 12:41PM Subject: BLUE HERONS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I WAS WATCHING THE NEWS TODAY AND HEARD THAT THE CITY OF RENTON IS PLANNING TO APPROVE PLANS TO BUILD APARTMENTS ON WETLANDS INHIBITED BY BLUE HERONS. I WAS OUTRAGED WHEN I HEARD THIS REPORT. A FEW YEARS BACK I WAS A STUDENT AT BLACK RIVER HIGH SCHOOL AND AS A SCHOOL PROJECT WE GOT TOGETHER WITH "THE FRIENDS OF THE BLACK RIVER"TO HELP IN EFFORTS TO SAVE THESE VERY HERONS. ALL OF US STUDENTS INVOLVED WERE VERY DEVOTED TO THIS PROJECT. AS A RESULT OF THE EFFORTS FROM THE FRIENDS OF THE BLACK RIVER, THE HERON POPULATION HAS BOOMED IN THE AREA AND ALL OF US STUDENTS INVOLVED TAKE GREAT PRIDE IN TAKING PART IN SUCH A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT. THE WETLANDS IN THIS CITY ARE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH OF THESE BEAUTIFUL BIRDS AND TO LET PEOPLE DESTROY THEIR HABITAT WOULD BE A TRAGEDY. I ASK YOU AS A LIFETIME CITIZEN OF RENTON TO RECONSIDER YOUR PLANS TO APPROVE CONSTRUCTION ON THE HABITAT OF THESE HERONS. SINCERELY, EMILY HAMEL 425-254-1007 f Judith7Wright.-Great blue herons refuge '!_ -99-178,ECF, R, Pagen1 • From: "Bob Green" <brgreen@email.msn.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/3/00 4:16PM Subject: Great blue herons refuge- LUA-99-178, ECF, R After all the time, money, and effort you have spent, it seems irresponsible to consider rezoning this area for apartment buildings. No amount of money can bring back this habitat once it is destroyed. The way it looks now, it is on the verge of being damaged with just a small nudge into the negative zone. We urge you to consider carefully what this rezoning might accomplish. There are plenty of other areas more suitable for high density dwellings. There are precious few rookeries left like this one. This is one preservation project that we strongly support and cannot even consider development as the Merlinos suggest. Sincerely, Clara Green la, ,,remit . 1,,,,„ -vny :--;,( ( J(cI� pp, 7 052 12.E , '• lv° .. Ut.-Ye \-vA crt ( 6 ' G 444k k11 hr�.. • 2_00 e, -Au -(g 1005 ( -LithAtivto cou (ram =ee +0 z - ((K , Am 11- W & u A. fop r `lp ad o .AQ,77-0,Ktivtg sa TH. ki [(5-:c,ae abott-e. 44-0 ig141-e•/ - Ki;-al v.it. . j'F. ' 61-/CACIIIi\ 01\a-Q- - 624,1-V9--- 1- IdOLLA UtANderAbl a :''-‘/Th_. -:1Pials- LbL::-- haVOt`-E- >,e\'':t.V C)0 A A 6( 4 irnAit 114s'i lice. pLi-,5- iiiik-44-yLOLe, 1/1-\ CL "4-4 i. ;\--k__ v , 0 .ecr Nelop,lek_m • J. am, „e4,0 ce4A-cJA/h A 4+; 4,- n _044a. r11 - l0l' 1) 00 s I — FcL . b9c ,u -Q_ a, .p� ,-,/ 4\ko . 6\tv\afr\‘. CititAi--\ (44\-Q._ K0,04 )\-;,iI -.,,Ae__ , &L 4.‘ (Jak y ,. ,,..1\ t , ,,, < )\\&.--\- �`port,( /,vs, ,y- i irJe '\-v,,Q .1, 17. 16-)t, ' ,-, .. '‘.-4 fi 4 It9,_).1 .5 04\1\d'• atAi0Y-Ale jolialtz_ --\-72 cdocz4,-,d.'01.,k-A‘‘ -'4).-.2,?Af. eMd-__.6r-m Ct '✓1 1. Jiu(r 11tf- th�hi1t '�iVJY� %� \ -� `f� k•-t,,0�; e `# .I ,,. (,- "-N- r- ; - ,\i\l\t_A:- c ,� �! ,l'yli SA TA V � ,V'�e :�a,s./�3� rks l(� GUC �'� 1/x61� kit' y `�"X�Y l7 a,4_ 'r910. Pam. `it..0U, kQ �jt,Q i•, ,Q ' 6(41\ Ca&- tOALORIA-e qe\tki '-iikP W)----A, 6:04 1././L:\(- '-7 a'4, . 1 11-- PI tg)-4 i) . . 0-7; .ti, •i , itg_ �;,, �. 5pAo-OOOK 1 Cl2ek VA;d1 06 ,0 -‘;.,e/...e. /Li.D.'f`ct-4 Li (40-0 ��A o Awn o-1,4 1 Alt-Q. ! a � 1.4Jl I/Qat/ _ f is--- , kozeoppA---_. ,am \-a1 AA javyl,frvk k (iuie " J b INA 4 a/C4t C tIOr v 5 . ! e\ ,..., "1 - , I ‘,1,/ z ( -, .. " ' '7,, A •: •-iirj?lj-"L-- ,.../tUt -t: -VI:\ ) fi tlaa. F.01.6( y V.y.14/1160 ..-- LU. * . �i{ '! C'`? ,Y- a i' i .,3:.4-: { ;'i ;� . _. Fy.- U o" k` /;,,. () .iT,2; :t/+ie 130/l/J/fit z?2� p('y d ( { / IIt r \' v- 1 ca Y� JIA'l 2r• 4 - 1 _wYr\/fy\ J,Cjlt{! ° i\kat---:- • 1 e_ 5 (TA, /ff�a,,, \ ` / A oc 1 -136,-tuce_ 7 - . • ,,y{,,;;•?-: p_11,,,/ ,e--.7 .(,...,Ai '- ,, , v vv \ \\ AA() i1J"�Li�'(��Q. I�1< (l( hF �i �; F�vl'ri, , - , Np )\-JUAN\GUY\NAAIR,0 rk04.. spi4,11- 1)100k (z-uati< „06.6 472:,,L.5-/Lk:.,00 .a,,,v .fp. ---i t �; C \o . -0, ��.;!,,� - Aikt4". '��,y teg, 0 0 12k` i , 4 L ii CO ikfi-/)) - . --------770PA \-4"M• . \ il 1 sp1 . 1"' " 1 Iv ri,vr.)/),Lf-it 67 :i7,47 Ili, t)ft i .f A,•t,I . ... i'k, • I . ! i 0 WO phun rregen-A 0 \--A- ,,<Tiffq : ,Po1 (.)-1.,hav rr 7) )\ t ,c) 09)- \\•\(\\ - -\ \-A,. • _.,0,1-)..0,yryy, dlb 1,•k.14-017)247-, a7, \f/)-2) i/NO-w\\i‘, ‘ ,., i -y(mc:() r 4,..:,-y .1,-% )-q,----a-i.:2-ovn-r3rAf. V() -., —61, yr,vric- i.,-- „, .9. , 6,1:42: ' i- , (Al - Ireiptyfrail tv) "70 Cll.( ,...)76tv„74\14/1/1,41 )--ei Yrfilg \-1t/t9).1 /' °I 11 471\47)1/9 -TsvirtT —zp.vz_ -Onvi -rick. ' s-A0-,r. - -?Jvt„tpp SA ri i - , ----- ----7' / '°'_10)1./-d IMAT.tVev aii,) ra-rraro-(11 -7kra14,00E-al i\-,A\LOorme ?ivn)).),.11 . - )Arott, )--epislity) \--212-jr.1 \ , • . . . 0,427 ---vrtvk710; 01 --7Pyri \sr, 40. Nvv9 II 9.. _ __. _._ ___.____..w.__. ,Judith Wri ht .._....__....�.._.._..�.._. '` � .� . .__.. . . � - a9e..... / From: <rachierache@juno.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/3/00 1:05PM please save the blue heron!!! dont destroy them!! • YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today-there's no risk! For your FREE software,visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. -Pe (`Judith WrightFW: Development of woos--' hillside near Black River Heron Colony _ ge 1_; • From: "Kone, Bonnie S"<Bonnie.Kone@PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'jwright@ci.renton.wa.us"' <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/3/00 2:39PM Subject: FW: Development of wooded hillside near Black River Heron Colony Planning Commission, RE: The Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Please save the heron foraging pond and other wildlife habitat. Not only are there many, many Herons, there are also Northern Shovelers, Golden Eye, Bullflehead, Mergansers, Green Winged Teal, Widgeons, Coots and, of course, the Canada Geese and the Mallards. These waterfowl either live here all year or use this area as a stopover during migration. I personally don't think this area should have been rezoned at all. In fact I think it should be left exactly the way it is. But since that isn't going to happen I agree with requiring the owner to submit a binding site plan which will allow both the Planning Commission and public to ensure that the owner builds a development similar to the one he now proposes. I don't think the Planning Commission should decide against requiring a binding site plan. Bonnie S. Kone Computing Asset Management CAD/CAM Products &Services (425)477-4308 M/S 6F-08 RECEIVED MAY 3 2000 IA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, c7 02 0-00 NEIGHBORHOODS. / AND STRATEGIC If LANNING J-(4-4a, S (-67 ..1 - iLW-M 36 ob.&,_,-- . ':, i , gh,. . a.,,,. /2.2.,- iiK4 / i - . 5k4rdtg—J- ^ e '44- e6tdzethe - Vd_.- , `Frte- cgi7eet-tezte a4-9-1/u_ frt/ 64,td ) ax- _ ' , ' 04 fi.ze4_ — 7ft-ii,t- xeilt44-/ ctJA-e.e.-, `re/Le icibleJk raiv-- f&tat ,e,?,7 • a/v4t -au9-- .t,o- fa co-a- q40-tice4-- cA4Afat ,,,-.,e:d4 , 6(vce. w-elidt.p / /. ate-y dA/Pcp pe- iaz pc,u-al 7,0 e-64,r. . o'l‘i-eAtetj OV4 eait -ilieJ)-v-0444A/vc . .„. .,, Judith Wright-Attention:: Renton_Plannina Commission Page,1 From: <AOffenback@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/3/00 9:29AM Subject: Attention: Renton Planning Commission RE: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Friends: I support the position of the groups requesting that the owner of this property be required to submit a binding site plan for the proposed development of the property near the Black River Riparian Forest. I oppose development of woodland properties and believe that development in adjacent areas impact woodlands and should be carefully monitored. If this property is developed, it must be done with great concern for its effects on the Forest. The City of Renton has a responsibility to all its citizens, including the wildlife living within its borders. When my father was a child he hunted Indian artifacts along the Black River and the shore of the Lake and I hate to see all of the woodland he knew disappear under asphalt. Sincerely, Anne Offenbacker /'1a., --ef a Judith Wright-Merlino Rezone Comment • __� __ __ __ _ Page 1 From: Margaret Pullar To: Carlson, Susan; Covington, Jay; Lind, Rebecca; Tanner, Jesse; Todd, Derek Date: 5/3/00 9:53AM Subject: Merlino Rezone Comment FYI...The Mayor's Office received a telephone call on 5/3 at 7:25 a.m. from Teresa O'Leary, 13715 SE 188th, 98058 commenting that Renton needs to preserve the heron rookery and urging the City not to approve the Merlino rezone. CC: Wright, Judith _.._...._..............__...- _..._w.....___.....__.__..__.._._._Page 1 , From: "MICHAEL KEARY" <mkeary@worldnet.att.net> To: "Larry Brosman" <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/3/00 10:12AM Subject: Project#LUA-99-178, ECF 5/3/00 Larry Brosman, Chair Renton Planning Commission 1055 S Grady Renton WA 98055 REF: Project#LUA-99-178, ECF Dear Mr. Brosman, I want to voice my opposition to rezoning of the steep hillside adjacent to the heron colony in the Black River Riparian Area. The development that would result may well drive the colony out.This would be unacceptable to the citizens of our city. Please take the leadership on this issue and do not allow the rezone. (And encourage people to get out to see the colony--they'll be nesting this month.) The Black River Riparian Area is something Renton can be proud of, and we need to enhance the habitat, not degrade it in any way. Sincerely, Mike Keary 2522 Monroe Ct NE • Renton, WA 98056 mkeary@worldnet.att.net Judith Wright-To Larry Brosman reNLUA °°..178 ECF R Page 1 From: <SZeeveMFG@aol.com> To: <jwright©ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/3/00 12:12PM Subject: To Larry Brosman re: LUA-99-178, ECF, R To: Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA Dear Mr. Brosman and the Renton Planning Commission, I am writing to urge that you deny the pending application for rezoning the site along the Black River Riparian Forest in Renton (project number LUA9978, ECF, R)to allow construction of multi-familty housing. High density housing such as that proposed (with up to almost five hundred units and close to a. thousand more residents)would impose irreversible damage to the fragile ecology of the Black River site. As a former resident of Washington State, I have visited the Black River Riparian Forest several times over the years.As a wildlife professional, I have been very impressed with the progress achieved by the Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation and the Seattle Audubon Society in preserving the integrity of this site. As home to a large colony of great blue herons, salmon, bald eagles, otters and other wildlife, the Black River site is a rare, intact wildland. As the Seattle/Renton area is increasingly encased by a growing crust of concrete and steel, the Black River site provides important riverine/wetland habitat for the plants and wildlife species that characterize the Pacific Northwest. In weighing the interests of developers vs. preserving our natural heritage, it is in your power to opt for maintaining a healthy ecosystem at Black River. I hope you do, by denying the rezoning application for this site.The public will thank you for protecting the natural heritage we all share. Please deny the rezoning application and protect this unique site for everyone. Sincerely, Suzanne Zeeve, Ph.D. P.O. Box 2082 Setauket, NY 11733 CC: <SzKrom©aol.com> FL—al Wright- Please preserve Black River ___ _ __ ____ rage d From: "Wilson, Nancy L" <Nancy.Wilson@PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'jwright@ci.renton.wa.us."' <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 7:54AM Subject: Please preserve Black River To the Renton Planning Commission and City Council: I work in the city of Renton and am a long time, frequent visitor to the Black River forest. More recently, have volunteered to help monitor success of the Great Blue Heron nests adjacent to the forest. Please add my voice to the litany of those opposed to the rezoning of the adjacent hillside. The proposed higher density development will surely threaten and harm this unique and fragile ecosytem, undoing eleven years of hard work by the City of Renton and Seattle Audobon Society's Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation. Sincerely, Nancy Wilson j_s7�/ - / -� (206)244-9504 (h) � , W� �a'i�E (425)234-2453 (w) CC: "'SzKrom@aol.com"' <SzKrom@aol.com> Judith Might ProjectnuberA ECF R, age... From: Linda R Radoff<Irrad@juno.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 9:39PM Subject: Project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R To: Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission Re: Project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R I will not be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting on Wednesday, but I would like to express my support for the objections of Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation, the Seattle Audubon Society and the Rainier Audubon Society to rezoning the hillside adjacent to the Black River heron colony for higher density. I strongly urge you to recommend that the current zoning by retained, thus avoiding the substantial detrimental effect which the proposed rezoning could have on this shining example of preservation within our growing urban area. The City of Renton should be commended for what it has been able to achieve with this project, in cooperation with citizens'groups. Please don't let this valuable resource go the way of so many other natural habitats that have been squeezed out by urban growth. I have been to this heron colony. It's an amazing place. While I was there, it was not only the splendid herons that impressed me. I met a family who came there often and whose children knew all about the herons, their habitat and the Native American ruins nearby. This place is a treasure and should be preserved so that the fruits of the cooperation and work of the City of Renton and all those who have been dedicated to preserving this site will also be preserved. Thank you for your consideration. Linda Radoff - ked N J. 206-789-0349 4'//7 Irrad@juno.com CC: <Irrad@juno.com>, <SzKrom@aol.com> Judith Wright- Rezone- LUA-99-178,EFt-R ._, _.., : __. _age From: "Gary Schulz" <gschulz@ci.tukwila.wa.us> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 6:06PM Subject: Rezone- LUA-99-178,EFC,R Dear Mr. Larry Brosman: I am writing to express my opinion concerning the proposed rezone of land adjacent to the Black River Blue Heron Colony. Without having spent to much time on this proposal I offer the general concept of maintaining the required buffer or open space that is included in the current zone district-Commercial Office and Commercial Arterial. Reportedly, the designated buffer/open space is 75% area. The heron colony is very unique and may be traced back in time to pre-development conditions since the Black River used to flow out of Lake Washington and into the Duwamish at this location. I personally appreciate having this wildlife habitat that is visible and very rare at the same time. The proposed rezone may create more pressure and impact on the habitat use by allowing more intense residential development and its associated long-term affects- noise, light and intrusion in the area. My recommendation is at least to preserve the current requirement for open space through a tract or easement. Thank you for your consideration! C. Gary Schulz Wetland Ecologist 7700 --L• 1�ih rcl� A c. e_ u)ff 9,2i7e1' Judith Wright.-FW:_Black River heron colony _.._._._ __.__.. ,___..._.._. y-. Page 1_} From: "Josh Steinberger" <josh@nwjep.org> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 5:54PM Subject: FW: Black River heron colony To Whom It May Concern, I would like to express my strong request to deny the re-zoning of the Blue Heron Colony overlooking Black River. I am both a high school teacher and an environmental educator and believer passionately about saving this small piece of land. Please deny the request to rezone the critical habitat of the Black River. The Great Blue Heron colony,with over 50 nests, is one of the largest in Puget Sound. The herons share the creek and pond with chinook and coho salmon that live and migrate through the creek and pond in the riparian forest. Red-Tailed Hawks fly overhead hunting for wild rabbit. Bald Eagles are often seen in this area. Even river otter and red fox are found here. The Seattle Audubon Society, Rainier Audubon Society, and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation are urging the City to not approve the rezone and I support them. Thank you for taking the time to consider this request. Sincerely, Joshua Steinberger 3& //irnwtt,2e;6 Judith Wright- Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone ... _._ .age_ • From: "Stenberg, Kate" <Kate.Stenberg@METROKC.GOV> To: "'jwright@ci.renton.wa.us"'<jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 4:20PM Subject: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Dear City of Renton Planning Commission: The King County Wildlife Program has concerns about the proposed Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment rezone. The proposed rezone is for the purpose of allowing multifamily development to occur on the hillside above the preserved forest tract that contains the heron colony. A portion of the rezone area also either includes or is very close to a wetland that is heavily used by these herons for foraging. The current conceptual proposal includes substantial buffers around this wetland and would be massed away from the colony, however, the rezone has the potential to allow a much larger development than is currently being proposed. We would support a rezone only if it is accompanied with a binding site plan or other conditions that protect the foraging wetland areas and minimizes the hillside disturbances. The status of Great blue herons in our region is currently in doubt. There is some evidence that their numbers are declining. The Black River Forest colony has gone through some troubled times in recent years. Last year, the herons abandoned the colony part-way through the breeding season - leaving eggs and nests untended. They are back this year and in good numbers, though it is still too early to tell if they will have a successfull breeding season. The City of Renton allowed a commercial development to be built this past year much closer to the colony than biologists recommended and the herons seem to be responding by moving further away into less suitable trees. Any additional stress, such as disturbances around an important foraging area could be the straw that finally drives them away. We have no way of knowing how much will be too much for this colony. The herons in our area are a subspecies known as the coastal great blue heron. The Canadian Biological Service has listed them as"vulnerable" under their version of the endangered species act because of observed declines. This is essentially equivalent to our listing of"sensitive". There is a lot of concern that they could become our next threatened species. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Kate Stenberg, Ph.D. King County Wildlife Program Manager 201 S. Jackson, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98104 206-296-7266 206-296-0192 (fax) kate.stenberg@metrokc.gov Judith Wright:save the heron colony__ Page 11 From: "Elizabeth Dunn" <liz_dunn@msn.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 12:35PM Subject: save the heron colony To: Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 From: Elizabeth Dunn 1122 East Pike St, PMB 1120 Seattle, WA 98122-3934 Dear Sir, I am writing with respect to project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R and the threat that is poses to the adjacent heron colony. It is unbelievable to me, given the site and the surrounding circumstances,that such a project would even be given consideration. I believe I speak for the majority of the community when I say that is obvious that urban expansion is having a huge negative impact on wildlife and the natural environment in our state. All eyes are on the Seattle region now and so we set an example for the rest of the country, if not the world. If we let projects like this be built it shows that we have made no fundamental progress on being able to plan urban development without destroying the surrounding environment. Even though I am a developer of multi-family housing, I have no sympathy for the developers of this project. It is proposals such as this one that give real estate development a bad image, and it does a disservice to the many developers in this city working hard to provide affordable housing in appropriate urban locations. Thank you, Liz Dunn Dunn & Hobbes LLC Judith Wright- Larry Brosman Chair, Renton Planning Commission Regarding the Proposed Rezoning of Lan ear __.e g ,, From: "Jordan Heiman" <jheiman@worldnet.att.net> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 11:25AM Subject: Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission Regarding the Proposed Rezoning of Land Near the Black River Riparian Forest Two years ago my wife and I enjoyed the pleasure of visiting the Great Blue Heron Colony at Renton, Washington. At that time, the commercial area just off the highway and adjacent to the Forest was being bull dozed in preparation for another office development. I remember thinking; "How unfortunate that land so preciously close to the Rookery would be used for such an ordinary purpose!" My reaction came from the fact that,with all the years I have enjoyed the beauty and wild life of the Missouri Ozark streams, I have seen many Great Blue Herons, but never a heron rookery such as the one surviving in what is left of the Black River Forest. What a marvelous gift to the City of Renton -to have such a unique colony within the city limits. What an opportunity for the City to preserve a small important slice of wildlife for this region of the State of Washington. At the moment, in order for the City of Renton to accomplish this, all the Planning Commission, and the Renton City Council need do is preserve the present state of affairs by not changing the present zoning. Surely it will be far easier for the"developers"to find another location for the proposed apartment complex than it will be for the Great Blue Herons to find another nesting site. Which will be of greater value to the citizens of Renton in the decades ahead. Yet another apartment complex or a unique Great Blue Heron Rookery in this small oasis of natural beauty. Please do not take any action that again destroys a small part of the natural world struggling to survive against the encroachment of civilization. Thank you, Jordan Heiman Connie and Jordan Heiman <jheiman@worldnet.att.net> 110 Stoneyside Lane St. Louis (Olivette), MO 63132-4124 Telephone:Work: 314-991-0477, Home: 314-993-1302 FAX: 314-991-3853 Judith Wright: No to development adjacent to Black River Riparian Forest ages; From: "Paul Schlenger"<schleng@hotmail.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 11:33AM Subject: No to development adjacent to Black River Riparian Forest I am writing to urge you to please NOT allow the currently proposed development near the Black River Riparian Forest. As a citizen, I urge you to act for the long-term preservation of our ecological resources. The proposed development is a detrimental plan for the important Great Blue Heron colony in the adjacent Riparian Rorest and for our declining salmon stocks. Please do not allow development of such a steep-sloped, marginal area that has high ecological value for the area. Paul Schlenger (206)287-9130 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com RECEIVED MAY.2,. 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Larry Brosman AND EIIGHBOGRC POANNING Chair of The Renton Planning Commission City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 April 29, 2000 Dear Mr. Brosman: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on a very important wildlife preserve within the City of Renton. I hope it will be your decision to preserve the Black River Riparian Forest by denying this multi-family housing rezone The Black River Riparian Forest is an extraordinary place. I have visited and walked the trails and have found it to be one of the last best places in Puget Sound. It truly is a "shining star"for all of Puget Sound, and deserves to be protected for all of our children, forever. With the recent salmon listings and proposed status review for the Great Blue Herons, we need to maintain this current low-risk approach to land use in this area. The City of Renton is to be commended for the current protections of the area. The Black River heron colony is under major threat of re-development to higher density. Multi-family zoning should be denied due to its potential environmental harm in the following manner: • The nesting colony of Blue Heron is worthy of protection. • Today many communities are striving to create more wildlife/open space with view to linkage. This already recognized protected area would be a regional loss. • To fertilize the yard and necessary plantings in a multi-family development would be to compromise the safety of the ground water. • Intense population centers bring with it the demand for insect spraying especially for mosquitoes. This would be potentially very damaging to the continued food chain for birds of many kinds. • The multi-family use would cause more intense use of the Black River Riparian Forest bringing future harm. It would be better for the wildlife/open space of the Black River to leave this area undeveloped. Office development, which it's currently zoned for, would have far less impact. If development were to be allowed I would encourage it to be no more intense that office development. The Black River Riparian Forest consists of steep slopes, which show evidence of having slid consistently over hundreds of years. Already, this year there has been at least one slide. It is easy to see that the area is saturated with ground water. Many, probably unmapped streams, run downhill into the pond, creek, and wetlands below where the herons, salmon, and other wildlife live and feed. The current proposal for multi-family apartments will likely have a major impact on the water table. The potential for future slides will increase with intense development. Due to the saturation of the ground and potential for slides I would think this is a very unsafe area in which to place a large housing development of any kind. The city would be at risk of doing so without undertaking and completing a thorough EIS that would enlighten us as to the following points: • The scientific description of the water table • An historic and scientific evaluation of past and future slide activity • The relationship of intense development on the groundwater table • The risk of intense development to the wildlife in the area, especially the Blue Heron • The loss to the region of a known and used wildlife/open space • The importance of the Black River Riparian Forest to migratory birds, especially geese Again, I hope it will be your decision to preserve the Black River Riparian Forest by denying this multi-family housing rezone. Reis ectfull/'y,, Rosé Clark 16856 Des Moines Memorial Drive Burien, WA 98148 (206) 248-3965 RECEIVED May 2, 2000 MAY 2.'.. 2000 Rob Jenkins ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, City of Renton AND STRATEGIC DS PLANNING 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 RE: Amendment 2000-M-6/2000-Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Dear Mr. Jenkins: I am unable to attend the May 3`d Public Hearing for the Year 2000 Comprehensive Plan amendments. Please enter this letter into the record. My comments pertain to the proposed text amendments to Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-69 as defined by the City Staff As it presently stands, Policy LU-69 clearly mandates that Residential Multi-family Infill designations should not be expanded. With the proposed language,this clear mandate is severely distorted to the point that the original intent of the policy is totally lost. Both Policy LU-69 a. and LU-69 c. could result in extensive expansion of RM-I districts citywide. This 180-degree shift in policy is unacceptable. These policies are also broad and subject to interpretation. In the case of Policy LU-69 a.,who determines if a site is"better suited for multi-family development that its present use?" And in the case of LU-69 c. who or how will it be determined that"more RM-I type multi-family housing is deemed needed in that part of the city or city-wide?" I am also concerned that these proposed amendments would result in cookie-cutter city planning. Decisions concerning use of properties for RM-I should be decided ahead of time in the context of citywide planning, not at the time of a development application. The revised policy would result in an unacceptable level of uncertainty regarding future multi-family land use throughout our city. As I understand it, these proposed extensive changes in our city's vision concerning multi-family development are in response to one developer's request for a rezone. One developer's needs should not supersede the needs and vision set forth in the Comprehensive Plan by the people and leadership of Renton only five years earlier. One could argue that the Merlino rezone application should not be approved given the substantial changes to our city's Comprehensive Plan that are needed to bring it into compliance with the criteria for expansion of the RM-I designation. I understand that over time changes in demographics may necessitate expansion of multi-family districts and that Policy LU-69 may need to be revised to allow for such expansion. The proposed staff revisions, however, are not restrictive enough. Revising LU-69 to include Policy LU-69 b. would provide the needed flexibility and restrictions, resulting in logical and limited extensions of existing multi-family districts. Proposed policies LU-69 a. and c. should not be approved for the reasons given above. Thank you for taking my comments into consideration. Sincerely, im Browne 1003 N 28th Place Renton, Wa 98056 Judith Wri ht- Please preserve Black " a- R - 09-/78'___..Page 1 ! • From: "Wilson, Nancy L" <Nancy.Wilson@PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'jwright@ci.renton.wa.us."' <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/2/00 7:54AM Subject: Please preserve Black River To the Renton Planning Commission and City Council: I work in the city of Renton and am a long time, frequent visitor to the Black River forest More recently, I have volunteered to help monitor success of the Great Blue Heron nests adjacent to the forest. Please add my voice to the litany of those opposed to the rezoning of the adjacent hillside. The proposed higher density development will surely threaten and harm this unique and fragile ecosytem, undoing eleven years of hard work by the City of Renton and Seattle Audobon Society's Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation. Sincerely, Nancy Wilson (206)244-9504 (h) (425)234-2453 (w) CC: "'SzKrom@aol.com"' <SzKrom@aol.com> / �,_._ Judith Wright Heron colony _ _ _.._ _ Page „1_ • From: L Baldel <w8n4sun@teleport.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 7:25PM Subject: Heron colony • Everything around us is very fragile. We all know all too well how so • many animals have suffered because we have taken their land away from them. Growing up in New York, and moving to the northwest a few years ago, I can't even begin to tell you what a thrill it was to see my first wild heron. They are beautiful and special birds. It is vital to secure their place in the future for others to enjoy. Do not disturb their nesting ground nor the area around it.We have all sacrificed too much, not think that developing the surrounding area near their nesting sight won't ultimately be a death sentence for these graceful birds. Respect this site as if it were the most important place on earth, knowing that your grandchildren will be able to visit it. Thank you, Louise Baldel 13020 SW Princeton Court Lake Oswego, Oregon 97235 ;Judith_Wright save the herons _ Page 1M, From: chak ng <seattlelapper@yahoo.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 4:20PM Subject: save the herons Dear Mr. Wright: I urge you to ensure that the heron rookery is preserved.Thank you. Sincerely, Chak Ng 5536 18th Avenue South Seattle, WA 98108 Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ Judith Wright- Merlino comprehensive ^'-n 15age1 From: "Nancy Thomson" <nit@scn.org> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> • Date: 5/1/00 1:41PM Subject: Merlino comprehensive Plan Please see my revised letter no longer supporting the rezone. I would like my letter filed and rerecorded as now supporting a NO REZONE position. May 1, 2000 Planning Commission City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Planning Commissioner RE: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone On April 26, 2000 I submitted letter to the Planning Commission supporting the rezone with the caveat that the commission secure a binding site plan from the builder to ensure that there were no unpleasant surprises down the road. However after further investigation I now believe that the Planning Commission should vote NO on the REZONE. I would like to officially go on record, at this time, as now supporting a NO REZONE vote I believe that a zoning of"multi-family"would create a greater intrusion and pose a much more serious threat to the integrity of the Black River Wildlands. I further believe that it is mandate and responsibility of the Planning Commission to protect and preserve the Black River Riparian Forest. It is a haven for herons as well as the citizens of Renton. The city and a dedicated group of citizens have already invested time, effort and money into establishing this wonderfully diverse environment where the herons and other native plants and animals can thrive, and in my opinion it would be a disgrace to watch the city begin to sabotage itself. I hope that the City and the Planning Commission will work diligently to create a situation where there will be no likely-hood of the degradation of these very sensitive and significant Wildlands. The wealth and value of City is measured by so much more than the cost or density of its housing; it is measured also by the value it places on the quality of life of its citizens and the worth of its natural beauty. Please VOTE NO on the REZONE. Thank-you Nancy Thomson 12500 -SE 100th Street Renton,WA 98056 425-255-0733 IJudith Wri ht A ainst Rezonin in RE _... 9.,.._.- From: Lynn Chapman <lynniechap@earthlink.net> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 3:19PM Subject: Against Rezoning in Renton Please vote against or stop the rezoning of the area right next to the Great Blue Heron colony along the Black River. These birds are threatened and your children and grandchildren will not be able to see their magnificence if this area is destroyed. Thank you Lynn Chapman 12341 35th Ave NE#404 Seattle, WA 98125 k Judith Wright w[Rezoning] Black River f n colony Page 1 From: <Joe.King@Design-Intelligence.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 1:30PM Subject: [Rezoning] Black River heron colony I urgently support all efforts to keep the current level of protection for • the Black River heron colony. I urge you_not_to pass the proposed rezoning of the nearby hillside area to Multi-Family. The rich diversity of wildlife both on the proposed rezoning site and on the area below is a benefit to all of Puget Sound, and a fragile, irreplaceable ecosystem that we hold in trust for future generations as well. Joe King Seattle CC: <SzKrom@aol.com> [Judith Wright- Rezone_adjacent to Blai-'� "ver riparian Area, NO!! ?ay„ i From: <Kzkbiorp@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 12:06PM Subject: Rezone adjacent to Black River riparian Area- NO!! Larry Brosman et al. Please do not rezone this critical habitat area buffer zone. Any development should be required to further buffer the heron/black river habitat with a conservation easement. These decisions, as I'm sure you are aware reflect the values and highest aspirations for Renton, and our region. Please take the initiative in shaping any future development as one that has no impact on this great community resource. Davidya Kasperzyk, AIA M.S. of Natural Resources Architecture.Urban Design.BioRegional Planning 1050 N. 34th St. Seattle, Wa. 9810206.632.6484 wick 1 Judith Wright- Fwd: [eitzor-discussio '"elp preserve Blue Heron Colony- Urgent-=-� email all that is needed)_ Page • From: <ChromKelly@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 4:07PM Subject: Fwd: [eitzor-discussion] Help preserve Blue Heron Colony- Urgent- (quick email all that is needed) 05/01/00 To: Larry Brosman, Chair Renton Planning Commission Re: Project# LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Chairman Brosman: I am writing to urge you to do whatever you can to prevent a proposed apartment complex development from being built next to a nesting colony of 100 Great Blue Heron along the Black River in Renton. As you may know, Heron in the Puget Sound region are disappearing and a study is being conducted to determine why. I believe that it is incumbent upon us to preserve the wildlife we still have for the enjoyment of current and future generations. Helen Ross, Seattle Audubon Conservation Coordinator, calls the Black River Riparian Forest and the adjacent hillside"one of the last best places in Puget Sound. This is the third time citizens have come together to remind the City of Renton of its responsibility to its residents to protect this wonderful place. This hillside is an inappropriate place for this development given the extraordinarily rich diversity of life on the site and the protected land below." Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, Jerry Chroman 438 NE 72nd St. Seattle, WA 98115 CC: <ShalomLaurie@cs.com>, <SzKrom@aol.com> Ju_dith_Wright-project number LUA-9--"1, ECF R Page 1_ From: <Blauster@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 4:11PM Subject: project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R I am writing to voice my concern about the proposed re-zone adjacent to Black River Riparian Forest. We are truly blessed to have this nature preserve in our midst. I hear that re-zoning the hillside next to the preserve will seriously endanger the survival of this place, the home and nesting place of many Great Blue Herons. Once it is gone, it is gone. I know I add my voice to many others. Thank you for listening. Ellen Blau, PhD Mercer Island, WA RECEIVED MAY .1. 2000 Larry Brosman ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, Chair Renton Planning Commission AND EIGHB GRC PLANNING 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 re: project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Mr. Brosman, I write to you as a defender of the Black River Riparian Forest and Wildlife Habitat. Please add my voice to the others' who ask (plead!) that the zoning laws not be changed to include multi-family dwellings on the steep hill- side behind the wetlands. It was barely a year ago that my children and I wrote letters asking that the new construction not take place during the Great Blue Herons' nesting sea- son. Thankfully, public outcry was such that our pleas were heard. My children and I find much joy in observing the herons and other wildlife in the protected area. About a year ago, I had an article published in a magazine called Home- school Dad. I was so proud to write about the preserved area in my community. I had many comments and letters telling me how lucky we are to live in a com- munity that cares about preserving some wild areas. I agreed! (I am enclosing a copy of the article.) Please make your decision with our children (and theirs) in mind. They shouldn't have to travel to the National Parks to see nature in all it's glory. Thank You, Jan Mayrhofer 12047 69th Ave. S Seattle, WA 98178 i .'r s': t : sr�s'' x ••4`Mi'.- ` �� . y8y:. •�'a „A ,y „r.A a ,v •:f, �. .-44 -r" 6 t�, �,i9't,`` "i. t y �. �• ^r:t �'c .t ^3r5�- `4. v ;tie` ` ak �,to 1* �''',i :74:,- A `'� ' .^'e 'S-�` - , 'EE rat !'?s' :.�Y°-�� r:.:..., �N., .... -_•.�,et � .�F't�'•. �:r. _, .'ak tt, �iea 3�f .��.t}� `•�'�,'� e � � �S�•`�c '`r,-"' �o''�� tip. a'-3, _ *4,g-',a4' K.Sr ,'•"c:`- a<• 1. �` '• `v;'rr:...'*r 6 a. - -d^ ++' t•-; "+ -�. r. �.,,,,,1`et N � k'c; -.•, 7"' f" Y,` - N a'4f'r'' "'"`rv7' t1- P;X r +'.fq' "t° _.�?' 'P'1•01 JE' 1"- TM 'z� - , '. 'x`sty Y 'r' a ry,3"'`, ira�E��,�. 8- ��' �' �i��.',: �;` �r",�*' :r7:it-y��Y+�£t :' }t�� '�r 'tii s'�` r ' ;,! i� ta..", W v r.',g.� ' % �s u7e;"jPt v�ir`-�p *t) u r ��-} 4. r =- k do 6�l " ,.Y! t +r isi z., a 4 i„ "i;`°v :,-'�yd .- �-,,. E ,,,- 4F` . ,—..' ' .�' ,.4 4 i rf' j� .. `M� ,,.at' ''� •.'t+ r i--�' .Y�c`yp,"`4. a .�- s y.P < "'",i,., "- ""'"y:: 'l t t..,:r 4' „s,��';��^ ��;�4s�,rr��',...tt�-�'.,•�� ,t�. L'��^1 �' *��Ya� s'�t,.s e' ��y � t �'.s,x .�yi"'- ��-}'�`��;' �".� .'�'c�, '1:>?'. yr. A. .',' 1S �• yr t ,v 7� , E � .k. l -"f'0:rAt, -s`„} n r 'w Illy ,t.a,:� r .•`'6 v: .'y�* �t •,74C - ^i.j + 1•"3,r,• , :n t -'y'•e a'' -."iS ��,'' 1;, r�1 �y��,},--rs 1 " �' J Ft�,y't �4 rr' �:�. .r1r"`„ i Y,4 '{ 1.',� '" }n A"'•r IK;ic*,;-. '-1,-A, a,i,t-�', ' (t K .g3AU^ •.,i-' , , --4 ". -kl «.T4 "4t -/„ •t '3t" r. '` .-X. Kj'-'NA �:r',:�t,�. iG wUl53• 4 � � ,".a;`�rYcy, '1y d.� �w -� � �{,. ,:� 0. ,r��( .,��'G,!! ti�,�, y� ' 'f'-4`1 .��;yC 4 :,"t�-�l.'u •y,&�, 9 ..E-.- F '� �*"�,us�' t"YY% - •7 0,_'' ,y - "f'•y. ',6 r�:,,T�t�a�, ayr�•,�-y r_yY'. ', .ata .,�� ';�.µ�, 1 FV. y� a .t r' :q4+,; r'+�T, 1,--z"h-2°< .xto,. '.,,4 .a;v i j,. A(atc �iZy' ` 'i1. eM� n' 1I 4tc4,' `i ,t,vi- ' : :5w 'c,7vK � .a�4 -t�' a;•:��'51:.�'z�s..•:<a^%.';;E= -�"` :K;C' - r-a�,rc:,r':="ham.„ � %z p � ,� .�",a. tv.;. d '' i�r,;f _ .-v^t�, .,, ' �` :3• .i '�_•?^: ci: fYf,: ,5rix`�. -,t ''"� r s, ',,A-e. -tg3h'C: .xia••Y,_• ''`�St' H}�, ie '1ti.` � ,4 ..tam.+, k `'Sj• '1. ., '$,y' :, "^' •; ..x •+"N �-#`�t".a:x 1, :k.4..„.;- :'r`.;M •:"�'°'t;%`` =�.',`��i:t::•.:`;F':a,,c i `-n ;�'r' � s.,,�'tzf.7� ..,� { Y,,k. .�•,� z,�`! ``'s-r, "`°p -:�<wr,. ,!��: m��i�3:"+,`'a-^-3�"7��t"3 -:.Y,>. ,.�_.t'�.s•s�. 2'-•"`.S * W� .:u�.€m'�c�,.}jk-tjj:'':_."`•. -s�t�i , ;, ;.�' �t �yt' .t-,t ,�': ., ?t,�.,.i •'„ 3;wr a- r ;a .-.S;.t...„;fu?a�.�.fI .i•' iu :.v!�,..x.,Ck- '` .Eur Yf"Y5.4( tft S:"?'7r.'tS..fT'rd.y41 . ..f,`.;, `'�''1.- Y.„1 a q?!', Y- .J.• .._65 f t... :i' " -J.•�r ;e"'„-'7. .c� rJ;- . ;�M,1 '�i�AI1 a •+re„..,. �r..y.,r �$� -}: ' ,;�:"a'�`�'.• ^:a �t. + -a �3::�'�``T: h�. r. y u run' ` l+i l!"K 7YS� .�:_'v;:,�; ;,�-°•�.n '��.t q• ,<,a'>•r;:FfSf.� ::�4,._ `�.`"`.�:.:�. �. t 1 ' . . _ r ;�: cSE:v ' 't ,: - +.��, ,.. ,,a .•r:at, 7,.,. �''. ,74 a 4... ,. 3.z. ' F:' �, Hry Ti. ,,V.,:J1!a • ..l.,. �� .�{��.S".,�-A N' .C.•.�:� � k:e4�Pt, 'V 3S"' .J •,�.. .Iil,.-.,.>'�� izfsfr�' - ;<_`� ii�; +_� _ ..3 n€ ..�<1�.'K,�:<y'a" i, � ,S-, ., I, _`^47yfs _ t x.tag ^e•,,4,V,.1,:aG,. 'A'�s .,t,. "ids: �'i"'s.':tr4 t,. :h`> Vn tYf h;,,,• �.�.;,t,.. ..P` F5^+ _>t-:._.r: 9F-^nn, .:1C.:.,, _r, y t-J,::.y;,:, Yx• 't. _v. in,,._ -.ate.. .� .', =y .. r+iu r..'.> n. r'o '.� �'�:' `f. Wit},.•F< •�.t v.a is 5�.. fc�i��r,, t c3',.>.,.•. ��'. U,.,> .S,sl�P '�uw. 0.4 t�M :i.'S :"¢' t,s n 4. t^; -a .�f-,`i:+i.4!'Ip'' 7 ,ii7�. r .r _ _ ..jxrt'� . .-.:..�:.,:: _�.;', -s,�' ,,- x..a-`..;.: ram. �,, •4. ;s..ry, 7:. !,;. ��e �} .r. i,w'. s ) '�.^ +gip. ,.'�"' ' x " `.i K e t.:, rr� rf >�� 7 • a 5 °k, Yam. 5 i VE'' is �2 of:. r�r '2 '' -'^ ram:. .k �T•- � Y'. real R v�,y ti 3 - :r t r 'y. .xt ,t� yam; r= r . j'a�t_ •"�'..tJf..Jh tY"t, `FJ�{f"tr„;1.,, - .y .y ,�r'rT �7.:s<c3'.tir't tv�,:..:,t; '+s,y._�� We didn't mean to get e ,. i t `*., � -k 4 r:tr';��, ,a.k interested It was while preparing for a tri• ? ,t . r . .' fir-- f in bird watching.The word:•` that we were planning for the ._ always brought to my mind purpose of enhancing our cur, •. .. . • • images of a stodgy,boring,her- ' rent unit study Puget Sound °. :. mit-like:person who had no real . habitats that our interest iri bird : brought me to the Audubon ' " life of his own,so he.chose to watching was piqued."'We were website.What a treasure-trove -_; spy on birds! And well,yes,I planning to visit the Nisqually' .of discovery!:.We,had so much : ; guess I could be a stodgy,her- Wildlife Refuge,where all within . fun looking at beautiful photo- • ,;: mit-like person,if I didn't have . in a 5-1/2 mile hike visitors can graphs of birds and even hear- ' children with boundless energy ' view six distinct habitats and the ing what their rails sound like! - and unquenchable curiosity to ' wildlife that live in them.There keep me in the'swing'of things! .. are said to be 300 species of 'Then it happened...we found I've since learned,though,that birds,mammals,reptiles, the link that really'changed our , bird watching is a hobby that amphibians,and fish finding attitude toward bird watching. gets you out of the house and . ' refuge there. - It was a link to our local chapter, finds you in pleasant surround- ..of The Audubon Society,which ings with the sounds and fra- . • The birds held a special fascina- in turn had links to local interest grances of nature to keep you,, lion for the children.Six year old groups that really targeted our ' company. And,surprisingly; Jeffrey's ears perked right up own community! We discov-'"- bird watching is a good way to when he heard the word!rap-, ered that not five minutes away find adventure! tor." To him,raptor had previ- : . from our home exists a,riparian ously meant a flesh eating forest and wetland habitat that dinosaur Which, is,home to the 1 t colon of; ;ch,of cou rse,is the azg Y • • stuff some of his best role p la Great Blue Herons in our:coup- :,i -'ing fantasies areinade Of:Well, ty! .It Was' really interesting to,_' ''; Maybe Bald Eagles and learn that so close to our inner: f«� ` Peregrine'Falcons aren t quite as city home,in the midst,of.Indus=: (concrete recycling and: `•`• exciting asahe velociraptors of trY ) ...old,but at least they are not`- - industrial parks.coexists a little:: .'':'. extinct. piece of paradise.This wild` • -- ' , place'is only partially accessible::.,.:1 •1 Ever on the alert for subjects that _ unless you are-.willing to thrash• ; , '' throu scrub brush and _ a i v �into "sho�w�mterest�I ' rase on Our stud `.: : wade/swim throw an enor, 'f" �' ' ' . bird population: 'My research : ' mous pond(sounds good to .! . 16 Jade-July 1999•, ,.:' - "..--i-:.'7.-.•(•?-r. ":.%':„,:i-.414T,LA, ,,,,4-i•Oe,,,..4--:'..' „4,3,,,, ..--‘,k4-.,$,-:,--;:‘',,-.._•,,,;2,-‘,,,,,,•?:',..z.-ii-,,..!,.x..,,,-,4-1 4,-,;i1.-i,, ,,, ',.n.v.„-,Elk::::3;:46L-v)-t•-.::_,‘ 4771 - ,- ,•,:s-IffeIre,-:slAikkiligek .;154-;:4 '-••,-,, ,,,,r,- '1004 . 4P:tirA.V.,;,', .. _:.k,. .;410 -,,A,'1;,..'';:f....,--'4-Viles „ t ":*,,*.-4.44 s*000'':' -,:- .-osq:IntO-AIWia0telf,',' `;.. . -. ..,y144-,:h. . .,4,44,-.•..::4,,.,Nni v.,•.,,, -,,•-, ,,..iet.;..,,,..,:ii,,--, _. .....,,,,d. ,.,,,_,.6. .1.!,,,..„,-„we..,,,,,..f.k,.i__,.. •,. , li_,,:,,s, ..,,_ ..„..;: ,,, -,4.41,4_•0A-,..-1-...vo,i, ...0...,..---,,,a,,,,:tf.it: ...,,,,-4,4;,!.. !:!,..;-‘,•...,,,t.„!,.!..,_•,....m.t., .. 4Z,M.,,AivilMit "090,-Eit4TrAtt",,'; '4'''.,':sz,fe4_„.,' ' ,--„7.42W- •" '-'4043.14itt: ' Srv"-'.4-or.t.m,..;.';. .... 4,,g4trit.,•:-4 1, r-A,,„i.. 05v,7-4.3.w. ,.....**101"-44k,"tiktuoth •--. 'i-F-: „:fi. -14--4, 3111-,--7,2:,--f--, --A., .... - ,,.-,.-; ?ivitz$;:,f. - .-,A, — , :' gp--4•ve•-•attpk,,0.:0454".- -stel-me ',,A",„., .a.,,,,-., -.:'.W.40.0t-4, -- ,.: 'P.,' :2 ' If:It-' fg...- '•: iiV'.4-, ,...*2-4,:fir:', -.4-qv emey.yopusismitisiomkomat4m ,,,ixtei apsion,but because-orotirgbAind al;, i; ,,:adi -;ir.i, -‘,,,,,4,1- .4..'',',tal.F.i.lvt,....9..,,,..vawstoiste.,,,,I.mx,p.w.se::--.'.. .,.;0..,,,,,i2.0,-...,• i•_,::__,, - .:_,. ...,_ .1_• '§Wz1,:W.'4,0t...MATeic,gatrAr - . :1$74,14;P>31e4-, .43,441.14MMFRIZ,W,AtrilAMUMMZ4A......P0i.4n .uarY,TuAuk. at triere44,:,),`r,i,. .`,:kAlocit. .., ,,. ":4 e4.4-‘,:.,,:WA:,:tvo `, ..ilettirritiel,";Y.editiiii4talaf-CV.INVO.Ziatit 4ie no.construction diiriiii4V,41,„-.46r40,,,cd'' ''."'-',Ar.f', '-'''."AM ,,„,,,otN.Ikt.,..„54,L,7,4,..-,„-,.,1, e,. .Ax.w..,,,,?:....;.3:4,44,=10,,,A,".:41,1m0,,-. ..:,,:•; i... . ,,.,. • • ..,,. •-• 0...u4e.k.t.ov ixrelged,i :goxei--vVi and nesting season :..• .. ,-.:k.eMeris Lai tit,€andi, uncisfiftfte4„.i-,1. 4 i mgtgitio.,41.vvitiwvotum, auii,I0 June')andbeeanie oflag''''4":14 m.-4,::::: ,,-ri.?;,..,.?4,'.:.•1.1-,..-Ni24 ..,Aa.'0,....„34..rp;x:02-4,evtg,,,i14-1-. . :-. :. ' .;: ..- -• . : • . : .- .tt, __ ..,,,,---oi.1 , .."..:6.. .T.44-1. fg1,:!F4 experts,.it .,Ami,„agP. F.19..R:i.3g:PisfMIFR-mig.); 19.7..A1,119.P,N,01.=Mgt-,Y,9,;':. I4ti.,V.:1WMtOliskicl.that a buffer : ,AA;‘i'''..01 #-.0.0 :!ttlie?) zi•-.5,011y..ObseryiO4:#4:ixiii-giiifiCerit465.*Qablie!of an established distance 4,'!!..4:47.fr'diS'Elif'eriiiilf;;,"'llatagina;, .. .g."0:•:4,-'71 j:*,owoii.j.:::av:::iorAror**ikygvm.lxtl.-,, if*..mainthiid. 4-3,,•reAy--,firo.-:.ittvf;,4174-4.,;w0,4A..11Q-sagel 1Oiyfity*Flittm§0.044 ,,fogeri- 140)*004,,WOn!•::.:. •- '• .ixij,6g...-i0.,:m444y..0 $ i;),'1:041**"cliiiirrl 0701.i!,:,.",,I'liO'iiipfiii..*ioitil'E4".,eiiiiii0-.04046PiPli*Ii-, ,, ,.::::::1,,z1„.--I.Pg.,N',4-t:*::: :1;:A%tiiqiititAk;'-ev.-.& It' laiiitcrgg:.1 .-:.., ,. t,:::::;`•:4 g:. r.,,.-.- :,:.i, .,-.V.: i6Q .:LIP: . , :.-... : . '::.. , . :f?':5,?:.a-i4,:::rg 1 ,,., :C.' :;'' 'tV .-'';':' ,', ' '6... .:gumc:gp!I.Tey,eF711pqawp?4..?j, ;:.. :,-14Y,g,corttume,-;to:eiloy!the..wEt;:...:,ain-:Nthmi,;:birdszNye.all.,.. ee another 1;i:•;,,.--:',l0e:the.:!154'ctidiec,2',,Ai4t:04'..'":0 ,:.:',I4iia.4.4iali-,414Ie•Sti4d-,.-iii;ii.:,ti4.i`P.''',,...',:.-:'Ts'•&'61.7.,:iiiiiA:aiiiiietii:h41,iniii--::•:' '.....pagiO:lia*efri'efiOrt0.•$erOr.i:1 :-e!,-.::::-.,-,zarea:iathe'Sit§'.Of-aOhO'Mightk!f :: :.',.•:.:'-',-010.1tlii-eiiihiii5oiitaiiiiiS of population,:124-.. t2. 4i*c.:0"0,0i0 .,:: :'1'0*4.;!ii**4 ivi*Saf&in:iliat't.l.'fe; :',',-.'::„'WOnder'aMi,MYSterY;:of'disOV :. . dive7**.pf th.0:1*#i'gclie0t'::.The r'.....: local Native OSe5ito:;:'..: • :-.erkran:d history Some one eagles are the only local raptors :•- ':: harvest as a mainstay to their 1,:„:_..:::' :always respond&"Yeak--leta go!" large enough to brave the nest:.. ., ' diet Here' now live muskrat, ' . • - 2": . • -. . . . , . ..,, raids among the giant herons;• . Coyote,beave4 geese,ducks, • ' . :.- • . ' . -, ' . and so both species thrive. But songbirds,rabbits,raccoons, Jan Mayrhofer,mother of six;grand- will it always be so? opossum, and many others wait- . mother of five,haS been parenting . . ing to be discovered.When we're for thirty-three years. She says that Our interest in the birds and not looking up,we're looking Izoineschooling her youngest three their habitat impacted our lives down looking down to see evi- children has been the most reward- and learning in another way. deuce critters that have been • ing, most challenging,most fulfill- The children had first hand :. there before us:• We're becoming ing endeavor of her lifetiMe. experience in the legal process good detectives! • of concerned citizens versus Big. Business when the expansion of A good field guide,along with ..:nr'.... . ).„. the industrial park before-men- some pretty good binoculars .,:-;',-;.Best Software This tioned threatened to encroach on have found their way into our S.--tile of the Galaxy! 'i ti the heron habitat. The children backpack which stays in the fain- We provide earth-basedfainilie:s with wrote letters,and drew pictures' ily car just in case. (On the way the best•software tools for-Active to be read and shown at the to the mall the other day,I saw teaching arid active learning Help public hearings. We talked to: an'eagle soaririg on the wind cur- .. your children d.iscover.the universe - of math and science with concept- many people;homeschoolers, . . rents;being harassed by several , building educational software .. neighbors,friends,etc about the small birds! I pulled over to ' : w.cifically designed to prepare them • for.,the future. ifi,/e have.O galaxy of impending disaster and encOur- - enjoy the show for'awhile.) • titles(everything from Algebra to aged them to write letters as • - • •.i'': • • - • ZaolOgV Blast on over to our website ." '' fOr moreinformation Or use if . well. • • • ." '' :': The kids can now identify many ' ...- standar' d teleCOmMunications durevice. • -• species of ducks,raptors, and : to call for a catolog. : .- ,":"•- . The children were utterly indig-,.. songbirds They have seen coy- • - . . (800) 336-1022 nant toward anyone who would :. ate tracks and evidence of a coy- . rather build a parking lot than . ''. ate kill. They know the differ- , r . :'..: Algebra have have this wonderful resource; •:'• • 'ence between the song of the red- • Geometry• - .41., ,-;,-, : : :',;',:-'•'; . , which when gone would be, . , winged blackbird and that of a . ' BioloOY : gone forever. I was worried that ' . ',black capped chickadee. They -• Chem's-I-TY • Life Sclence their hopes would be dashed ' . wonder where the Migratory , • • Computer . and they would lose confidence birds are heading when they , ...Concepts in the process of fighting"City , : leave our area. They imagine Hall." •- • ' •What it Must haire been like to be ' . ", Ventura Educational Systems . " ' „•910 Ramona Avenue,E •• - a Native American Child, liming • :.. • . Grover Beach,CA93433 . . As it turned out,we didn't Stop here without the intrusion of ' , www.venturaes.com . : . • . . .. . . . . . ,.. . .. .. . . .. . . - - - ---- ,. i Judith_Wrigt1,-project_number R Pa e 1 i • From: <GandolfSea@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 5:09PM Subject: project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R • To Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission Reference project number LUA-99-17.8, ECF, R • • Hello Larry- I am writing to you to lend my voice to those saying that the existance of the Black River Heron Colony is a treasure that needs to be protected. With so so much already lost let's work together to save the little bits of natural areas left for our children and their children to see nature as it really is. My family joins with the city of Renton and the Seattle Audoban society and Friends of Renton Wildlife in supporting the least destructive use of the adjacent area. Thanks. the Gandolfo family CC: <SzKrom@aol.com> i Judith Wright- LUA-99-178ECF,R Pa e 1 • From: "Thelma R. Gower" <thelmagower@hotmail.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 5:14PM Subject: LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Mr. Brosman, I understand that you are the chairman of the planning commission of the city of Renton, Washington. I also understand that you will be holding public hearings on the above-mentioned subject matter in the near future. I am a long-time resident of the greater Seattle area. I would like to submit this email into the public record of hearings &comments concerning this matter. To wit, I am totally opposed to changing the rezoning of any area that is directly adjacent to the Black River Riparian Forest. The herons are dying. We need to help them; not put up apartment complexes next door to them. Do not allow a rezone to occur. Sincerely yours, Thelma R. Gower A Registered Voter Bellevue, Washington Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com Judith Wright-project number LUA-9r"3, ECF, Rmm WY - _- _ mw µ Page 1 From: Araya Sol <eitzor@juno.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 3:15PM Subject: project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R To: Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. RE: project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R I am opposed to changing the zoning codes and endangering the little precious open space that is left in our urban areas. Sincerely, Araya Sol 3238e NE 100th St Seattle WA 98125 CC: <szkrom@AOL.COM> Judith Wright-Heron rookery ..._ Pagel From: "Julie Haddad" <juhaddad@hotmail.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 1:19PM Subject: Heron rookery Dear Mr. Wright, I am writing to urge you to protect the heron rookery at the Black River riparian zone by not rezoning the adjacent land (Project#LUA-99-178, ECF,R). I am concerned about the impacts a housing development will have on this unique resource. Please do not rezone the land. Sincerely, J. Haddad Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com {Judith Wright- Reference Project LUA-99-178 ECF, R - Page 11 From: "McGilton, Joan" <Joan.McGilton@PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'jwright@ci.renton.wa.us"' <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 1:26PM Subject: Reference Project Number LUA-99-178, ECF, R May 1, 2000 Mr. Larry Brosman, Chair Renton Planning Commission 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA. 98055 RE: Project Number LUA-99-178, ECF, R: Black River Rezone Dear Mr. Brosman: I am very familiar with this particular heron colony. My office window, for four years looked out over this riparian marsh. It was certainly disconcerting to see all of the building that recently has taken over much of this land. And,we all now see the results of the infill in Auburn that has reduced habitat for that particular heron colony due to the Super Mall construction. I urge you to consider the testimony from all participants at the Wednesday evening Public Hearing to refuse the suggested rezone in support of protecting the heron colony at Black River. This area is regionally recognized for the nesting colony of 100 great blue herons and the fact that it is one of the few remaining riparian habitats in King County. I agree strongly with the supporters rejecting this rezone that there will be a significant impact to the creek pond and the chinook and coho salmon that share this unique habitat if this development moves forward. As others have sucessfully said through the last four land use actions, Renton has been instrumental in protecting this habitat. Please be aware we all appreciate your foresight and hope that it will continue. I realize the pressure that developers can bring to a project. They hold out jobs, revenue, tax base and private property rights as the key to successful governing. I occupy a volunteer position in Burien that is addressing these same issues. These projects are contentious and can divide the community. But, you and your fellow commissioners have the vision to realize that what gets destroyed will never be there again. I am not able to attend the Public Hearing on Wednesday but hope this letter will suffice as testimony to the proposed action. I implore you to not change the zoning and let the herons and salmon be the Renton outdoor education link for the entire region. Sincerely, Joan McGilton 2640 SW 164th Place Burien, WA 98166 CC: "'SzKrom@aol.com"' <SzKrom@aol.com> Judith Wright-- Protect the Great BlueT ;;ns: DO NOT REZONE Page 1 • From: <TLIANU@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 1:15PM Subject: Protect the Great Blue Herons: DO NOT REZONE To: Wright& Brosman Re: LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dt: May 1, 2000 Please know that concerned residents of Vashon Island are opposed to rezoning around the City of Renton which would allow for the destruction of habitat needed and used by the Great Blue Heron, eagles, and so many other species of wildlife. The Black River Riparian Forest and adjacent hillside are perhaps the most precious treasures currently under the protection of the City of Renton. Please: *for the sake of your children and future generations *for the sake of the survival of beauty in the Northwest Utilize your power to protect these areas! Thank you for your assistance. I will not be at the meeting Wednesday night, but will pay close attention to your input and decisions. Tammy Lianu, M.A. Vashon Island Resident Concerned About Preserving Northwest Habitat CC: <SzKrom@aol.com> 1Judith Wright number LUA49-178, E R Page 1 • From: <SharmanBY@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 5/1/00 12:36PM Subject: number LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Larry Brosman, I would like to offer my appreciation for the preservation work that has taken place so far in the Black River area. However, I am greatly concerned that the rezoning for homes/apartments being considered for the area adjacent to Black River will provide the type of impact that would cause Black River to degrade beyond your abilities to continue to preserve it's uniqueness. Please keep the zoning as Commerical Office for now. Should an opportunity come up in the future, re-zoning the area so that it could be protected as park land would even be preferable. Thank you, Sharman Badgett-Young 6925 185th PI. SW Lynnwood, WA 98037 CC: <SzKrom@aol.com> (Judith Wright- Project number LUA-9' "'3 ECF, R Page 1 t From: <ShalomLaurie@cs.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/28/00 7:43AM Subject: Project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Renton Planning Commission, I am writing to oppose the planned rezoning and apartment development of the hillside adjacent to the Black River Riparian Forest. I have been to the Black River site to see the blue herons, and found it the most peaceful, beautiful and lovely place- not to mention an important home to the blue herons and other wildlife. If the hillside is converted to multi-family housing, with all the families, cats, dogs, cars and 24 hour a day activity, it would be a terrible blow and setback for all the work that the City of Renton and the Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation have done to preserve and protect the herons and other wildlife. I realize with our growing population there is tremendous pressure to build housing anywhere one can squeeze it in, but I also know that its important to keep perspective on the things that make life worthwhile. There was a special on ABC earlier this week,where they showed all the rural and wild areas in the U.S. that are being converted to housing -we are throwing away our birthright of this beautiful land we live in. When I go to a park or preserved area, and read how the land was donated by some far-seeing individual, or preserved by a long-ago administration, I am always so impressed that someone was able to look beyond the moment and see how important our natural places are-not only to the wildlife and natural vegetation, but to us as a people. We don't live by concrete alone! This is not an "extreme" plea to protect acres and acres of land from all development-the hillside is already zoned for business use, which is a low-impact usage. Simply a plea to keep the area low-impact, and to take the courageous step of saying "no rezoning"to this beautiful, important area. Sincerely, Laurie S. Almoslino President, PC Database Solutions a division of Laughing Brook Inc. Seattle, WA (206)283-4155 Judith Wright- Black River Heron Colo^�� , _....._._ ..___..__�.... ......_.4�__._..._.._._.. .............._...�..,_.._..�_... Page 11 From: ablack <ablack6@yahoo.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/28/00 1:13PM Subject: Black River Heron Colony Just a quick but sincere email to show my support for retaining the current zoning status of the Black River Heron Colony in Renton, and NOT rezoning it for higher-density use. (Reference: project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R.) The Black River colony is a tremendously unique place --and tremendously important, if we care about maintaining a healthy degree of wildlife diversity in the Seattle area over the years to come. Rezoning it for higher-impact use would be devastating to the site and to the herons. It would be a major loss for the city of Renton. Thanks for your attention to this important issue. Amy Black Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ ;Judith Wrightt- Heron Rookery _ _._Page 1 • From: Jan Magnuson <JMagnuson@cityofdesmoines.com> To: "jwright@ci.renton.wa.us"' <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/28/00 10:58AM Subject: Heron Rookery I have been made aware of the possible rezone of the area in Renton, that would adversely affect a large group of nesting Blue Herons (reference lua-9>9-178,ecf,r /Attention Larry Brosman.) As a concerned citizen who works in the animal industry, I would be against the City of Renton agreeing to this rezone and causing a destruction of the natural habitat for these beautiful and majestic birds. Blue Heron numbers are declining in the Puget Sound area, and I feel that the City of Renton would be irresponsible in perpetuating this decline. Thank you for your attention. Sincerely, Jan Magnuson I Judith Wright-project number LUA-99 • From: <Maribroida@cs.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/27/00 5:36PM Subject: project number LUA-99-178, ECF, R Dear Renton City Council: • To protect the endangered Black River blue heron colony; please do NOT rezone the hillside nearby. This would be a great disservice to the environment and our children. Thank you. Marian Broida maribroida@cs.com iz Judith,Wright- Project#LUA-99-178 Page 1 #aaoo— 'V-G * From: "Doris Samuelson" <Samuelsons@msn.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/27/00 12:27PM Subject: Project#LUA-99-178 Please protect the Balck River Riparian Forest and OPPOSE the proposed rezoning to Multi-Family. The area sustains wildlife, including salmon and heron,which would be adversely affected if the rezone were approved and the hillside developed into apartment units. Thank you Doris and Kurt Samuelson samuelsons@msn.com RECEIVED MAY 1,.• 2000 '4p; / e ez),e9 v ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 7;/ /11 //Orii NEIGHBORHOODS, • �, • AND STRATEGIC PLANNING / 4. J 1 a 6_ r/ 5 1 ' a f/c, y�/i 91"/ 71 1 n///////)9'- /I9/,/7/ //7 key fee7a4 044 l/1 /7�f 5 J 0,/--/2 Lv / /`"/&/ A7,rh, wd/'�I-�G�, / Az4?`J J . (� � ,G�/e i 5 7a' %>�vf� f� 70f. . /14`fa)425-f e 7" Je' ��j�GS�G /7-e��i�� N � •%`.; ''vi 11e d /) c . /!v- 7�d� ��`/�� /�//f�/'79a ✓��i° G/l/�l� /*✓' 2z)L) / / . ��C' are /!? 7 4/ l%�f'�G'err7G��i T r-U//7/ 7` --e r5/X '7/2 •//le f�it%JG/S ,i /" yr°G , /7 o/M /f e 1/ 7// // /7 a'/Y«// >/- ;//7 fa,-d /0* • s /7) ////L/c' 1/`9 The. d2-<-)4- 7/ 5'7 ./.9 eL . /ve5 T G'7 D /tkz- Gt/4C . a," /- de a -57"7ey- ./a27/ e/77r 14)/ / //( . 70G/1/k aa, f/y& 77/ :"--7/4/n//y T70 �O/��,ew/ • 74 Judith Wright-Black River-proposed 71",'elopment Pa9e 1 From: <DIDIANSTET@aol.com> To: <Jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/27/00 3:22PM Subject: Black River-proposed development To the City of Renton and the Renton City Council: The Great Blue Heron rookery in the Black River Riparian Forest is one of the most unique and special places in the Seattle area. Historically, it preserves a tiny remnant of the drainage of the Sammamish and Lake Washington watersheds that existed prior to the installation of the Hiram Chittenden Locks. It is a real eye opener for people to view this area and understand how significantly the Locks have affected the ecosystem in our area. While we have nearly eliminated the Black River,we still have a chance to save another aspect of what makes the spot so special. One can walk into the trail in the greenspace and view one of the largest heron rookeries in the area. Kate Stenberg of the King County Wildlife Program advises that 40% of the rookeries in the Puget Sound area were abandoned during the nesting season in 1999, so this habitat is becoming increasingly precious. Herons have wing-spans of 6 feet and are quite beautiful.When I bring visitors to this area, they are awed by the herons and the nesting colony. I feel privileged that the herons still choose to nest in our urban areas.And IrcOm so pleased that we havenrcOt completely obliterated their habitat. But it seems wercOre getting close to doing just that. I have brought visitors to the rookery ranging from teenagers to people in their 801'COs. I have brought visitors from the Eastside, Renton, Seattle, and from other states. I also bring people from other countries,visitors at the International Hostel. For all of them, it takes their breath away, and gives an image of Renton that they would not have expected. It surprises them that just minutes from a bustling area,you can be in nature, unaware that you are in the middle of an urban area, and viewing these amazing creatures. Thank you for your past role in protecting the portion of this greenspae that has been purchased for permanent preservation. However, more needs to be done at this time. While the herons nest in the tops of the trees, they also spend time along the shores of the pond.A large apartment complex, its residents and their pets,would have a serious impact on the area. Please consider how special this area is, and how it needs to be protected as you deliberate any requests for rezones or permits for construction on adjoining property. Sincerely, Didi Catherine Anstett P 0 Box 17023 Seattle,WA 98107 206-784-7828 didianstet@aol.com CC: <Tomnyari@aol.com>, <SzKrom@aol.com>, <Donorman@aol.com> tJudith Wright- Merlino Comprehensive-'din Amendement Rezone ry mmmm _ u_ Pagel oavo- Of- G #. 7 ' From: <Hughbirder@aol.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/27/00 3:44PM Subject: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendement Rezone For The Renton Planning Commission, I support the Friends of the Black River in their effort to ensure that the Merlino SR-900 property is developed responsibly. I also request that the Planning Commission require the owner to submit a binding site plan. I am the field trip chairman for the East Lake WA Audubon Society.We regularly schedule 2-3 trip to the Green River Riparian Area to see the Great Blue Heron nests and the abundant waterfowl. Hugh Jennings 16116 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98008 hughbirder@aol.com Judith Wright- rezone adjacent Black f'.--r Riparian Forest µ _ Mw _. Page 1 From: Stan Kostka <lynnandstan@earthlink.net> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/27/00 5:06PM Subject: rezone adjacent Black River Riparian Forest Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055 Concerning the property directly adjacent to the Black River Riparian Forest, I am opposed to the rezone because of its impact fish and wildlife. Great Blue Heron populations in Puget Sound are in decline for reasons that are not yet clear, and have been proposed for status review conducted by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. No rezone. respectfully submitted Stan Kostka RECEIVEn April 26, 2000 MAY 1 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOP Planning Commission AND sTRAT GRC Op NG City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Planning Commissioner RE: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone I am submitting this letter as a statement of support for the Friends of Black River in their efforts to ensure that the Merlino SR-900 property is developed responsibly and with great consideration given to the sensitivity of the Black River Heron Colony. It is my understanding that the Friends of Black River are not trying to stop the development of the property but only to ensure that the owner submit a binding site plan which will guarantee both the Planning Commission and the public the safety of the heron colony. In the event that the planning commission decides against requiring a binding site plan I ask the Commission to impose conditions on the rezone that will protect the heron foraging pond and other wildlife habitat. I believe that the Planning Commission is in a position to ensure a win-win situation for the owner, the city, the public, and the environment. I urge the Commission to be very pro-active and to act with great foresight in dealing with this matter. You are in the unique situation of being able to responsibly create a safe haven for the heron before the damage has been done instead of trying to repair it years later. The Commission has, at this time, the ability to protect, enhance, and safeguard our native wildlife for the future and I hope that you will take the actions necessary now to keep safe these beautiful birds for future generations. Thank- you Nancy Thomson 12500 - 100th Street Renton, WA 98056 425-255-0733 Ile env W ekeir • RECEIVED 12530 Admiralty Way,#J-302 Everett,WA 98204 (425)423-9069 MAY 1 2000 email: iweber@seanet.com ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND STRAT GRIC PLLADNNING April 26,2000 Renton Planning Commission City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Re: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Dear Commissioners: I am writing this letter to express my support of the Friends of the Black River and their efforts to ensure that the above mentioned rezone request of Merlino SR-900 property is developed responsibly. Protection of wildlife habitat is essential to our quality of life. Please make a decision that will ensure that this precious resource is not compromised. Cordially, ji-e-e44/Z(.1de.A., Ileen Weber Judith Wright-Planning-Commission : Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendme _ —ezone ____ _ ___ Page 1 From: "Nancy Thomson" <nit@scn.org> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/26/00 9:58AM Subject: Planning Commission : RE: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone April 26, 2000 Planning Commission City of Renton 1055 S. Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Attn: Planning Commissioner RE: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone I am submitting this letter as a statement of support for the Friends of Black River in their efforts to ensure that the Merlino SR-900 property is developed responsibly and with great consideration given to the sensitivity of the Black River Heron Colony. It is my understanding that the Friends of Black River are not trying to stop the development of the property but only to ensure that the owner submit a binding site plan which will guarantee both the Planning Commission and the public the safety of the heron colony. In the event that the planning commission decides against requiring a binding site plan I ask the Commission to impose conditions on the rezone that will protect the heron foraging pond and other wildlife habitat. I believe that the Planning Commission is in a position to ensure a win-win situation for the owner, the city, the public, and the environment. I urge the Commission to be very pro-active and to act with great foresight in dealing with this matter. You are in the unique situation of being able to responsibly create a safe haven for the heron before the damage has been done instead of trying to repair it years later. The Commission has, at this time, the ability to protect, enhance, and safeguard our native wildlife for the future and I hope that you will take the actions necessary now to keep safe these beautiful birds for future generations. Thank-you Nancy Thomson 12500-SE 100th Street Renton, WA 98056 425-255-0733 ebecca Lindy Multifamily Infill areas __.__._.__, _...., Page 1 i ,/oae• 14••L ,t-T= �f From: <WPOL@aol.com> To: <rjenkins@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/25/00 10:29PM Subject: Multifamily Infill areas Color me not in favor of expanding multifamily developments. Renton has plenty of this and more even in the downtown core. Single family dwellings will promote a more resident and involved population rather than a relatively transient rental population. We need more people that care and are personally vested in the community, not just more people. Don't misunderstand me, multifamily dwellings are necessary and important part of a community, but in balance. I feel we have enough. Density is also enough unless we plan on widening roads such as Lk Wa Blvd to four lanes. God help us that may come to pass with the port Quendall and Shuffelton developments. Chris Barry 1401 N 36th St ._.._ith Wrig e,P mdment Rezone Page 1 ,_,......nn..,......w......................... ,yw-.....w..vas—....,...rc.......,.,...,......w-.—..w..v.vn.......„.....„........--v.+_...........,,_„,„. ............. j. idith n t er ino omprehensive Plan ._.__ .ww....___.._,...w,. __..___�.___..,. From: "Berglund, Corinne J" <Corinne.Berglund@PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'jwright@ci.renton.wa.us."' <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/25/00 9:05AM Subject: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezone Dear Planning Commission, I am concerned about the requested rezone of the property of the wooded hillside behind the Black River Heron Colony. We all have a moral obligation to protect the biological diversity of our area. Once this property is rezoned to Multi-Family Infill, there will be nothing stopping the owner from moving ahead with an intensive development beyond that which he is now proposing. Please don't be blindsighted by the dollar when making your decision. Sincerely, Corinne J. Berglund Corinne Berglund Human Resources , People Organization Personnel for BCAG Engineering (425)234-6324 M/C 67-WR (425)234-9941 (fax) Work Schedule Mon-Fri, 6:30 am -3:00 pm email: corinne.j.berglund@boeing.com «...OLE_Obj...» r a000 -6 II. April 22, 2000 RECEIVE Planning Commission APR 2 5 2000 City of Renton ECONOMIC GHBORHOOpg ENT, 1055 S. Grady Way AND STRATEGIC PLANNING Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Merlin°Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone(LUA-99-178,ECF,R) Commission Members: I'm writing to you on behalf of the Friends of the Black River. We are a group of local residents who share a common interest in the Black River Heron Colony and the Black River Riparian Forest. We do not oppose the rezone of the Merlino SR-900 property to RM-I, provided that the owner develops it in a manner similar to that shown on his Site Plan Concept Study(see Exhibit A). The concept study is not binding however, and we are concerned that once the property is rezoned the owner may decide to develop the property in a more intensive manner than that shown on the concept study. We request that the Planning Commission require the owner to submit a binding site plan for public review and comment prior to receiving the Commission's approval for the rezone. In lieu of a binding site plan we would support a conditioned rezone,provided that the rezone is conditioned as follows: 1. A maximum density allowance of 10 dwelling units per acre. We will support the owner if he submits a variance request for a density of less than 10 dwelling units per acre. 2. A minimum 300-foot buffer requirement between the category 1 wetland located at the southeast corner of the property and all development (see Exhibit B). 3. A minimum 100-foot buffer requirement between the seasonal stream located on the east end of the property and all development(see Exhibit B). 4. A minimum 100-foot buffer requirement between the Burlington Northern railroad right of way along the southern property line and all development. Storm water treatment and detention facilities may be located in this buffer(see Exhibit B). 5. A requirement that the owner construct an open pond storm water detention system instead of a closed vault system. An open pond system planted with native plants provides wildlife habitat value. A closed vault system provides no wildlife habitat value. These conditions will allow the owner to build a development similar to the one that he shows on his Site Plan Concept Study. If during the course of design of the project the owner fmds that he cannot meet a condition, the condition can be changed by City Council. This will allow flexibility in the application.of the conditions and allow for public input if a condition needs to be changed. We feel that these conditions do not place an undue burden on the owner because he has already indicated to the City that he plans to develop his property in this manner. We provide the following information to support our request: Environmental Qualities of the Merlino SR-900 property: • Only the Burlington Northern railroad right of way separates the Merlin property from the City of Renton's protected Black River Riparian Forest. The Black River Riparian Forest houses the Black River Heron Colony,which is the largest heron colony in King County. • Even though the Merlin property is located several hundred yards from the Black River Heron Colony, development on the property will be located at the same elevation as the colony,providing a clear line of sight between the development and the colony. Activity on the Merlino property will impact the Black River Heron Colony. • The Merlino property lies adjacent to, and may even contain a portion of, a high quality wetland in which the Black River heron forage. This wetland is one of only three known foraging areas located near the Black River heron colony. These foraging areas are critical for the nesting heron. This wetland is located at the southeast comer of the property. ♦ Besides the Great Blue Heron,the Merlino property provides good habitat for Bald Eagles, Red Tailed Hawk and Pileated Woodpecker. These species have been observed on or near the property. The Pileated Woodpecker is listed by the State of Washington as a species of concern. The Bald Eagle is listed by the Federal Government as threatened. All four species are identified by King County as species of local significance. • In addition to the species listed above,Black Tailed Deer, coyote, owl,red fox and numerous other mammals,birds and reptiles utilize the property and move between the property and the Black River Riparian Forest. When this property is developed,we expect to see degradation in the capacity of the Black River Riparian Forest to support wildlife. Rebuttal to City of Renton Planning Staff justification for not requiring a binding site plan or conditioned rezone: In the staff report to the Planning Commission, City staff claim that the City's site plan review and critical areas regulations can be used to ensure that any development on the site, "Minimizes disturbances to geologically hazardous,wooded slopes.""Provides adequate buffering of the proposed development from the blue heron rookery...." "Minimizes the visual scale of the residential development...." We believe that the City cannot require a low impact development, like the one currently shown on the owner's Site Plan Concept Study,through site plan review and application of critical areas regulations. We have the following concerns: ♦ City staff admit that RM-I zoning of this property will allow for the development of up to 482 multi-family units on the property. • Sensitive areas regulations prohibit development on slopes greater than 40%. This regulation applies to only 1.89 acres out of a total of 26.01 acres for this property. • Sensitive areas regulations require only a 100-foot buffer for category 1 wetlands. The owner's Site Plan Concept Study shows a much greater buffer between the category 1 wetland located at the southeast corner of the property and his development(see Exhibit B). ♦ Sensitive areas regulations require only a 25-foot setback from seasonal streams, such as the ' one located on the east end of the property. The owner's Site Plan Concept Study shows a much greater buffer between the seasonal stream and his development(see exhibit B). • Sensitive areas regulations do not regulate setbacks from railroad right of ways. The owner's Site Plan Concept Study shows a significant setback from the Burlington Northern railroad right of way(see exhibit B). • We believe that the site plan review process cannot be applied to considerably limit the density of a development. City staff imply that it can in this case. We believe that they are wrong. Development density is controlled through zoning policy,not site plan review. Conclusion: The owner of the Merlin SR-900 property has submitted a Site Plan Concept Study for a multi- family development on the property. The concept study shows a low impact multi-family development of 200 units. The study shows considerable buffers between the development and the category 1 wetland(located at the southeast corner of the property), seasonal stream(located on the eastern portion of the property)and southern property line. We do not oppose a development of this nature,however we are concerned that a rezone may be allowed based on the owner's non-binding intention to build this development. The owner may then change his proposal once the rezone is granted. We ask the Planning Commission to consider this possibility and act accordingly. The Merlino property contains numerous wildlife habitat functions that are worth preserving. In addition,the property is located near the Black River Riparian Forest and development of this property will impact the wildlife habitat functions of the riparian forest including the function of the Black River Heron Colony. We ask the Planning Commission to take into account these impacts. City staff claim that sensitive areas regulations and site plan review can be used to considerably limit the scale of development on the Merlino property. We disagree. We request that the Planning Commission not approve the rezone of the Merlin SR-900 property unless: 1. The owner of the property submits a legally binding site plan to Planning Commission for public review and comment; or 2. The Planning Commission conditions the rezone as we have identified above. If you have any questions or concerns regarding our request,please contact me at 425-277-8219 and I will gladly discuss this issue with you. We plan to attend the Planning Commission meeting scheduled for May 3, 2000. Sincerely %XVI Onaraiii Tom Malphrus Friends of the Black River home phone: 425-277-8219 18713 102nd Ave. SE work phone: 425-430-7313 Renton,WA 98055 e-mail: tomnyari@aol.com cc:Renton City Council ,N E X HI SI T • • • It �� ♦e/ t nv� 0 w fle-T' • 0c 1-ti1t., ( %e.r\,:/no SR -90c 4'`0?C"" 1) • • am "'...��` ``"`.rj { • • CD 'mow �• µ,�`'�w. \I 1\ In. N .r•u•'•..r••..I/•.•_+...,r•�r•••.,n..o.�.w .•.._.r.•-•.Pw..��.�•,.. .l,.w.,y„�w"...w.�nw.,..._w•. \ �••J1`^�,,,__ ..4 ) ./'.Y.�1.5...J:: r.;rW. .• •.—r ..a-...r' Ir ,• - :r..�n`..•'•�!;..•,"�..z:•-•••. \. ; a.. ... .w: C• 1 Mom+ J�: „�w+• ...ti .•......... . .•.• r ,•• ,..� •.♦/ /,,,,..• 7 ''•'•�\•\1%:::: ,`"~ ,fir.•+•.r±;'�':.�•• •([{' w.w. �,r "•,..,.....: N .` ` rcy. t :/b ems'• J•-.• �y'�•�.�..si • , • — .''• Key ;~ . % \ 2. .s./ ,(\.\\s„...\:\sv / L/i '••.I.... - :., ".S'i• 1i %' `�rJ' �:i r .., l .. 7�.1 •, `♦r.�~,\��♦,\r ♦` �\ , ''./ter?0r '.'i. ... am•.... 'mil }•�Iy •',. •V 1 I`t._,- L. \♦`\~-" • •.;\. • • •"...N ..,.... • „ ��1 .w••., r....••"•' r•r'!-,•r, • ' 1 •.%...r•" V// `4•.r•' r •s ♦ •'' `` \•. 4ii ••\•., `' ♦\ •i isi-.-i......, .....‘.s.S%„‘..".',....•.1/4--.•- .+ r/f/•• f... •••F ..." • ++y71r 1• .-_ .r.\.. _ 1I / ;\. r..s..r...� w♦ \. ,'`... `\.ti• `••,\ \••~• - \>N\ .4..i1../i.,.:1_.....1.a..-,0,,l.-.l1e1.-.i..-!,.1-i1.v-‘0.‘-'-...'-.•••..ii...ffi.i..p...l // 7 j„ 'w•...,...yww• + ^ _ r /1/,/ .."..w.r%' �1``♦�♦`.+•r• E ��1. \\ ♦ \. III . ,2t ...•.. _.••„..". -., ` �1\`. - f' ,,, , .�•.,.,... •.w._..•.•._,.. '•.•' l � �• ,. �• .,;{F` ."R�`a`iiry \ l •\\▪\ '\ . 1 Aiii�I. f ..1 it l;•� 1` ♦ \1 !� \i) r./' .• ••" n..,.w•a-,....... 1, ..�:1' :'ram, .d-r... •••••4"........"..7 �"ti \:,\•,\.\ .✓'n... . `\ `\ 7``\.. � ,.• l r •.,••r•� + w. . '. .•_ '••�:� "•ram•''• Y _�11�• ♦. \• ........-... •I l ` % •\ C. / ,• �-.;-• w� r ~ T▪ '�• fii0`�`�` ..../r••n• i,• ;. \r I \ s • A •� 41.. l•♦.. ; 1,♦... �`� • r. 13 41 n • -"♦ /� \',•. r1.w'\. o 1 4, ' ELAN CONCEPT�STUDY - • tip 1` 1 ./ /! * .0♦c 1 ' . u ..1( X •,-1' _b • •-! .•.-•- )1/4:, •A'-') OR All 51-0 ..\‘‘`' - immimpronimpipaqm lira; _ __ _ • ...........---. - .. , v -A-,:fr ,44- .),( i)(-jr,. • ' ' . .- _ . ______. _ e • A CIt1.1-9 .1.c:GNC, NV ic4 at.I g V , . ,..• 1 ;:.•-•-1, k I) ..r';4..;.,t..\ - - rv-01AnM cr 1 51 "\‘`•••"•‘.. ••IC,,Or • . '"! ... %/.4%:.4>.. \ es. e,*/4 :1.' T. klo -ac.)-.7 • • 7. ..”,N-4,-\.• • .k4,/ Jr A-Ar . , ... ......,,,,,zi...•..,„_....- .4.• i., - %,‘„. ,• -,0-•,..,•:;:,........ •-------- • .-1 1,...,•• • -.., . s„..,......,,:;:r.,....z.:;;;;•••,. •,,,r,--;., -....._. 4-orri 40 .1..i1C;1 J rvoJi t-Oj a. .„s%,,•'1•4:::, •••••::.;•,...."..'.:?::::•ZZ-F.:•:••-..-- ...,—,,,k•• W VDU-5 ..,:ss%*-1')•••,..:,:•.1',-..s.r.;;F-•:':.-Zt'.... :;•:ZZ:.,.'•• -‘4,,, . . tol•J1,144_,11 QM ualti,1...1 no a ...,:,sz.:.,./.........,,_:..--......,•„,...$•::•.,-;•.4:44-,-•:::::.1.-• , . • t.'•*-..••••""•,,:`•••:Z.:'::'".`.••::.=....r.:;,.-.;;;;;;••••:::` • rOU 0912-a5 . i N.•••.%•••—•_-••--,---..:::..-:?...%-;••••:......-::;- „,/v.- - . • • co .....--1::..- . • ..... • k •'1. N.*.l.'.1, ..".•. .:'• ' '•'I' C ‘s.A..%%:..•',........•-:••••. ""'" 1, . • • "• :1 e„,::Ns..,`,..... er;.•••• •••ss.z.,;:.-.:.••-•-•\‘.; -"'"'••••.,.., •...,,-, ',.. ''•• .. • .. ' ,gi•-•q ''ir- . '''''.. e-.. _...• • i- i' /0 N N\‘ •• ;-••••—•-.,\, ,, • , .., . ‘1, -•. . ••••—• -•..,` ••••••••i,•,;,--,,,,, . :_ -wt.,' `•••• j,L_./ , • •. 1 •, , - ' •...‘ •• . .-••••••••,:•-•-zz: ,,,..\.,,,,, .„ ; ., , .. . ...,,.. •7. . • ...; •., ...,, ,,,, .....„,,4„ ......,„ . . .„. .,:e. .; • ......4""" r. 7 / . \:. ‘... N... \ -% \ ,.. s .,.• ......, .7.," — „,,-,-----... \ -N-...,„ •..., .3.......,..... .....4..„.... ,......÷.„:„.0_4 ••• - e ....../........ .r.• "..• , .• 1,1.I ...... 1 ",.•......... • ......,_••\ \. •\ •\ , . ,•••.,.......„.• koir:Z.Z;1 . .../.. .,...„/ / .1•. ; •(1\ .% k ••••N \ \ '••s\•.\\ s. ;1 ,?•••,"' Ai.virile I PR s.. `-• -... 1%'• 1.,_\.‘,..--s*C:17,4•:%-...:.••.=,'".".1',=11".7j4 ,-d-.;- .4•747.7.::„...5'."-- :::::..,..:•••'•. •''T.::-...:-...""*".•••••'''.•... ' .:4.•••••-‘ .Pe' i; ‹.\\ V l .... ) 1 ..) ',:• . .. „.77-.1. ...viidaitmi s \,\._-.I. •‘ \ ....•••...... ..., ••,...7.7 ••••••• -..z.r........._7 . .. ...,. • -.• -• -...._...., •.(4.• • ....I 1/ z) ........:......... ........ .. . . ..7.1, . ,. .. ‘...,..\'.. .,_ ., ,...:,,,'N..\,..,..„... •-,....,• ,,/ ,• ,..„....--. „,..,..,.......,_ ',.*:•%,, •••',..::::. \\ •.. . ••• N.... 4 1 1 1 1 \ • \ \ N • . ...••••• N's ...".-.'••••.. iv ''" ' • •...' . ••••• ''' .....././ .'-' j-ir ‘ ) 1, ..,:::"`•••.:1 -"•••-. , .si , ‘ ' ,, s. ‘. . .s.--.... ‘"*"" /. -. "-"••••--_ / , • c,,, i III ir"." •-••-••••••"'"--"-------••• """"• . ••• ''' \ ' • -Ns.. \ \Ai f ./...%•:‘...„"*••••••. • • .- ...... ;'1.\ c•. ''..,/,.m. .• s 7 v.,., '' . .. _. v • ..iirf,111.g, 1 ,.... • •%•• , . •.• N. •• ••• i . '•. ,... • '. . -' e• • 1/ K2 1" .•''''' -' 's• •NW"(ORA • --' '' .-, ,. a) ...s., ..,14. , '6....., ••.. • . -"-•..-•••..--.••••-••••••••••.. `‘. .. , • N.,„."`••.,,,„ ' '.. e.,,••• •••• " •. ... • r -•-'-•Oa. ,. • ..."‘'''-gait *id liw imem.1114 :•••••-.- • ....„,-'‘,/ v-•&,S's..,...... .'s'•••••. '''• aa.lia,' • ‘, ; s, .,„•.„`‘i s„ , ,.....••••.,.....- •,,, , / , •- • •••••••- 4.,-.••,_iii... .ie-g• ........ ,. .1•••••••-• .„.• „J.' •-• ‘'sN e'\' .s.••• .s"• • zwgentiliti. ' ) i '. • •\ s'`• - •sS,-.V\.. N., .. *iv-- ,,,,,ta4;••;7:,...., L. ••••--,\• . \s..„ -•••_,.-•••••••••.:,':../ /•',A\ ....... oil\ . -• -s' 11 tali ---'''''' r -,4:-..t.... •• \•,1%.. :,•:.,.. ••\6% . I . • .......,.e.' ...,..••••••• ••••••••••.... •••• 914i APO .7:401;i7/?,:*.,-,\;,,r• ..•• •-• •,.,,---,'`,•,,.// ‘'.".....- SIOI 't4r-.....- """." .......-./•et No..\\.\.: •,.,:cs,,,t,.%• .,.:z1.......••...::....,...%.., .,,... •?:.,41,161 ,.. ,....,..,1/4._.....„,....... •,..•• ..., / +.00.0'... .• , ,, A.,....,..;••••-, ...........'.. I... ..Sni.!...". ••••• •••• • • ..y.‘ ••% ZS) ./.•••••. ..,...• 0 1 . ..•••••'.‘• ..•• / 0.44 4 4 *lie'%."... .. • r .--• ••• ... , ..s....,P ' %.,\. f.' ... . - . ..••••....P. cipigiwiiivail lima ..,•••••.•• •• VII ‘,••• dee•::: .... s.:. „.e.... .---,....., me _ . • \ \ , . .,•-• . ...." . . Oil ,,,.-....w , • .....s_ -,s..„1/4, ...„•, ......, ,-..., ...,/.#„/, , Alt. 2.•••..,7 :1:',.."...71 .. .e...% . 1"...•l'%"..••• \•1, •....,:,,... 1 •. •,::..••. -......„, ....„. "s,... ..1718(.• 011111 . .01,....s'..N., old' Ilialir Vaal•N• •-•'''' "- ..,160 ,__a mr- - - ...... .=AA__._. , /-.„....„,..••.%:,.... , -..., . rirz., -'•- , \ .•••••\.,./...•.#N••\.. s".... ••••..,,.. illillf.\—Awn- ...,_1111,..,,..,4:-,... NN 'V,.••.. : -.., •...‘"*.., ‘-'41.'", -...., ' . .,IV 1..... .I.% % ••• ..... ‘ 'N,..,." ••••‘%....%%%.Zss,.,.. •, '•`. %/ apiii AP .. .;411.1 . /akar •• I•.# •• Vila .•••• . , ,• ••,i "P. . 44,114ibeLle.,. , ••.•..'.•.-.''-- I, .... ... .on-.4••••••• ••''.:..!.. . -..'* "... "'vp'''gl°..t./.7.a...,".....1 to•01•,;"'" . -.3.......---. .,,...•*". .46,•.,,,2_ ..4.,0 ....1 ..,...„./.‘,,.., .., sv ••s\.. •••••s^.. -"• o•4. 4r.aNt'.4--- ..""$14..,,,... • - -..-/, ...,,/ • a• ----- lii, Pamrt 'r•if,i "-..... . •..... - -, •,,,-,..•••.•-,.... .., ;••••t•.,-,.:,...-v/ . ,ev:... . ,_ - iiiii.litia . - . ...- . I Q %... ‘4,,..4..... ::.„.... ,..s ... i•• ...,‘,.,,,,:m...40 mar(mita*.--,,L-1 '' jib' ii .r.A.V,iti . ..,•_tr_IL???.!--. ii7.1•4_:-. ..1".....r: ..'.:::/ii./.;•/„./1....../ , •,‘‘`....,..%• ••••,s'%. ss.1.. s.... ."......,..2 i...''..:.• . itir billi ' lam' ' 5, ...21. 5 ks.,,"..••••••,:"•••... 6 .. i %.,-•' , 0,4•4' ••• **--" W-;)•••A541°711."-e!.-'-•:' '-• . •e:., -N cp . i'.\‘"%. ''''''N• . -13::`11•:....*••••....... .":•••••':::."..\\''. . • ••... ,:as1•_,,'''41 . • 11 1-.1'-:-- .4./ ...f„...1' , • -/• ••••••••••••••••••-1 •••14:•„../..... CP ..'N%%, s.'"•••••:.s..Z:•s•:"„ '' '‘..i.;:;;;',2.. N‘\cl.... ...77": i ...,....... ".-'1.i.'. •••• . ••• • . i %..%%, ..-4:ta*.yt:2.11.4.:g. -. •••k4„..4./ . .- ,1 ,...• ... 1 0. ...., ... ... ...........,...• ,..._,,.........,....,,...: ..• •••••".....:•:.•::::::..,..,,,I.V.A5f.75747:, r ‘‘‘‘.%"...k.1..... %N.%%...s..... .s.••S..4•Ziiii.:.::::.*::.t....;:::'••••••••••.,..4.:::.,::.:_"-....z.]:.,...;:z4---....,.€79 .4:::::::::1--___.'s•:;:.:_7...-..*. .......,-..it:...... :: _ii.11.:4:. .,i•i• t4 s"•••••••• -•"*-7.7:--:'41:ii...-i.::::::::.F:••::gril:y.r:rv,b•_•:."-;',. •'. •.:.:•--,":,,,...:";;;;;:::;:i.- --- -••••••,1--"•"7"ttf••-• •• • ?"•••• i a) a., I ( 1••• -..,,......, •••••••••.n.............,••"' •••:•7.,"•1:.:".•-:• •: ••':-. . .. sN..,,.......s, .••"•- .1 ..............----- •P' •••••.....,.. s • A-.....e.••• 1‘) *----......,........ ...... • ..... . • .-,........„ 1,1 -.., • • -----„,.... -----_-_....,,_._._..,.....__..---,.....,••IM........•..•••••••• P4 CO ••••••,.......s, ...G., CO • ... • 1,0 i r ---.. ..,... . . • Sia ' . . . 40 -i c, (ru08, g-vt. 1-,..-.ea...).. uo.)7)4 .) lovy,l_krzer -r.- /....)06_\:0-7 :34.2 u014 -)0-r .- ,a• . CI , J__. -5_1 Il 44 A. -1 ... n.) • • . • E Judith Wright-Merlino SR-900 Page 1 i From: shirley m tollefson <stalll3@juno.com> To: <jwright@ci.renton.wa.us> Date: 4/21/00 12:32PM Subject: Merlino SR-900 Although I live in Auburn, I would like to say that I support Friends of Black River in their effort.to ensure that the Merlino SR-900 property be • developed responsibly. I was fortunate enough to discover the Blue Herons nesting site there recently and believe that every effort should be made to made to preserve the lovely tranquility of the area below the hillside where the apartment development is being considered. Shirley Tollefson stoll13@juno.com RECEIVE APR 1 9 2000 Suzanne Krom, President Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation ECONOMIC DEVELOPM ENT' 4715 1/2-36th Avenue SW ,,,._NEIGHBORHOODS STRAEGIC PLANNING Seattle,WA 98126-2715 April 19, 2000 Larry Brosman, Chair, Renton Planning Commission (fax: 425-430-7300) City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 Subject: Comments re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone, project LUA-99-178-ECF,R Dear Mr. Brosman, First,I want to thank Mr. Rob Jenkins, Senior Planner for this proposed action, for giving me until today to send my comments to you regarding the proposed rezone and amendment change. The other signers of this letter and I were not Parties of Record for this proposed action.In the future, please always include us as Parties of Record for any proposed action in or near the Black River site. I am president of Citizens For Renton Wildlands Preservation, a 350-member organization involved with the preservation of the Black River Riparian Forest since 1989. The Seattle Audubon Society and Rainier Audubon Society should also have been Parties of Record for this proposed amendment/rezone. Seattle Audubon Society represents over 5,300 members, including Renton residents, and Rainier Audubon Society represents over 1,400 South King County residents. We have consistently been involved in the public process and.have requested in the. past to be. Parties of Record for this geographical area:,Please•add'us.to_your permanent Party of Record list for any future proposed'action in or hear,the"Black'River site. = The hillside overlooking"the BlackRiver.Riparian Forest is ariintegral part of the protected open space below. The Black River site is'of're'gional.significance and value,_and the hillside abutting the open space provides important habitat thatcontributes significantly'to the rich diversity of life that exists on the Black River site. In addition, it has a profound effect on the waterflow and water quality on the Black River site, including the wetlands, P1 Pond, and Springbrook Creek, as well as the Green/Duwamish River,which is less than one-quarter mile downstream. The pond, creek, and river are home to the Threatened Chinook salmon, as well as Coho salmon and Cutthroat trout. We are extremely concerned that the proposed rezone will result in a development that will significantly alter the habitat of the Black River area and feel strongly that the Renton Planning Commission and Renton City Council should recommend denial of the rezone. We urge you to reconsider your original SEPA determination of DNS,changing it to a DS, and address these issues through an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement). It is incorrect to conclude that the proposed rezone, in anticipation of building 250-482 apartment units, will have a less than moderate impact on the environment. The Staff Report fails to consider the environmental impacts of the proposed amendment/rezone, and subsequent_development of 250-482rapartinent units. The clearing of the'hillside, anticipated development of the apartment complex(es),-and inevitable introduction-of 445-858 new residents has a strong likelihood of significantly"degrading the habitat for the Great Blue Heron colony-located immediately below, as well as the Chinook and Coho salmon habitat in Springbrook Creek,P1 Pond, and the Green/DuwamishRiver,which`is fed in part by water coming off the subject property. The Black River heron colony.is one of largest heron colonies;indeed perhaps the largest colony,in the • Puget Sound region. Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 Any one of the following concerns in this letter should warrant a DS (Determination of Significance) and thus an EIS.The list of concerns in this letter taken in their entirety should warrant denial of the proposed rezone. The EIS should require environmental studies of the impacts of the proposed rezone and subsequent anticipated development. The EIS cited in the Environmental Checklist for this proposed rezone, dated January 31, 2000, applies to the Black River Riparian Forest--the habitat on the hillside is very different from the Black River Riparian Forest area. The information in that EIS is not applicable to this hillside, which consists of native vegetation,wetlands, streams, and steep slopes. Overview(Please see the pages 4-6 for details): a. Habitat: The habitat on this hillside is unusually rich and pristine, which renders it unique to this urban setting. The Environmental Checklist is incomplete,leaving out all significant species of animals and plants. It incorrectly states that no threatened or endangered species are onsite.It incorrectly states "Unknown"in response to this question on the checklist. b. Open Space and Greenbelt: How will the City mitigate for the loss of the 75% open space requirement on the diversity of habitat on this hillside and the Black River Riperian Forest? Removing the Greenbelt designation from this site represents a significant environmental impact to this site and to the Black River habitat below, as it relates to Open Space. c. Human Impacts: A significant adverse environmental impact will result from the human impacts of multi-family dwellings in this habitat and the Black River Riparian Forest. d Alternative Nesting Habitat: The hillside habitat may provide alternative Great Blue Heron nesting habitat in the future. e. Hydrology: The proposed rezone and subsequent development would have a significant adverse impact on the hydrology of the hillside and lower, affected area(the Black River site). Development of the hillside would result in an increase of impervious surface on the hillside, resulting in greater fluctuation of water levels during storm events and a reduction in water retention in the hillside. f. Wetlands: The subject property clearly intersects the eastern wetland according to the City's own Property Map Exhibit,dated December 14, 1999 (according to the Environmental Checklist, "it is difficult to tell,from those maps whether any of the wetland actually lies on the subject property." [stated repeatedly, including pages 4, 6, 11]). At least one other wetland exists onsite that is apparent from SR 900, and should be delineated. g. Streams: Clarify the status of streams on the proposed site. h. National Marine Fisheries Service 4-D Rules: The rezone should take into account the proposed 4-D Rules from the National Marine Fisheries Service concerning a"take" of Chinook salmon. i. Slope and Soils Instability: The hillside consists of steep slopes and unstable soils. Removing the Greenbelt designation from this site represents a significant environmental impact to this site and to the Black River habitat below, as it relates to slope instability. 2 Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 The Environmental Checklist states "Unknown"in response to the question, "Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity?"It is not clear how this response was obtained since this contradicts King County's designation as "Slide Sensitive." Prior to approval of the rezone, environmental impact studies regarding erosion should be conducted. j. Traffic Impacts: The impacts of traffic were inadequate to warrant a DNS. Why is the City allowing the developer to base their traffic and other analyses on the minimum density allowed under the RE-1 Zoning (10 DUA)instead of requiring them to use the maximum? k. Protection of Remaining Pristine Habitat: Studies should be conducted to evaluate how the City will ensure that remaining habitat will continue to flourish and not evolve into a plant community dominated by invasive vegetation. Please see pages 4-6 for details about each of these concerns. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this proposed rezone. Our organizations feel strongly about the protection of this area and have been advocating for its protection of many years. Sincerely, ., LLr v b Si__ (Sic) Chuck Lennox, Conservation Chair Bruce Harpham, Conservation Chair Seattle Audubon Society Rainier Audubon Society 8050- 35th Ave. NE, Seattle, WA 98115 P.O. Box 778, Auburn, WA 98071 206-523-4483 ext: 13 253-939-6411 Suzanne Krom, President Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation 4715 1/2 -36th Ave. SW, Seattle, WA 98126 206-933-0222 cc: Kathy Keolker-Wheeler, Chair,Renton Planning and Development Committee Randy Corman,President,Renton City Council Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner, City of Renton Rob Jenkins, Senior Planner, City of Renton • Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 Details of Overview on pages 2 and 3: a. HABITAT: The habitat on this hillside is unusually rich and pristine, which renders it unique to this urban setting. It consists of old-growth bigleaf maple(with well over 25 trees larger than 100 cm DBH), conifer snags, and a rich understory. The Environmental Checklist is far from complete,leaving out all significant species of animals and plants. For example, (plants) old- growth bigleaf maple, snowberry,Indian plum, skunk cabbage (an important indicator of wetlands), and (animals) many species of hawks, including Red-Tailed, Sharp-Shinned, and Cooper's, and other birds and other animals, including American Kestrel, Great Blue Heron, Green Heron,Bald Eagle,Pileated Woodpecker, Great-Horned Owl, neotropical-tropical migratory birds (including warblers, orioles, and thrushes), red fox, river otter, weasels, Pacific shrew,white-tailed deer, Chinook and Coho salmon,Cutthroat Trout, Pacific treefrog, garter snake, and Northern alligator lizard all exist on and near this subject property. The checklist incorrectly states that no threatened or endangered species are onsite. On the contrary,the Bald Eagle is still officially listed by the Federal government as Threatened, and the Pileated Woodpecker is a King County and State of Washington Species of Concern, and both exist on and nearby this subject property. Pileated Woodpecker and Great-Horned Owl are known to nest in this area. This is part of a migration route. The checklist incorrectly states "Unknown"in response to this question on the checklist. b. OPEN SPACE AND GREENBELT: How will the City mitigate for the loss of the 75% open space requirement on the diversity of habitat on this hillside and the Black River Riperian Forest?There is simply no way to mitigate for the loss of pristine old-growth habitat that includes mature bigleaf maples, and established snowberry and Indian plum habitat. This is glorious wildlife habitat that has taken hundreds of years to become established and mature. Not only does the elimination of this habitat represent a significant adverse impact to the hillside,but also to the Black River Riparian Forest, as the current habitat significantly enhances the overall diversity of the Great Blue Heron habitat. Any loss of habitat on this hillside should require mitigation by improving the habitat on Tract C to original conditions using such measures as reforesting with native trees, shrubs, and replacing the artificial fill that's been dumped on the site by the developer. Removing the Greenbelt designation from this site represents a significant environmental impact to this site and to the Black River habitat below,as it relates to Open Space. This also relates to slope instability and is therefore included in section i,below. c. HUMAN IMPACTS: A significant adverse environmental impact will result from the human impacts of multi-family dwellings in this habitat and the Black River Riparian Forest.The development would introduce between 445-858 new residents (250-482 apartment units) to the hillside/Black River area,creating social trails into any remaining habitat. EIS studies should include documenting potential impacts of humans and their domestic pets. d. ALTERNATIVE NESTING HABITAT: The hillside habitat may provide alternative Great Blue Heron nesting habitat in the future. e. HYDROLOGY: The proposed rezone and subsequent development would have a significant adverse impact on the hydrology of the hillside and lower, affected area(the Black River site). In this highly environmentally sensitive area,there should be No Change from the current, predeveloped hydrology of the hillside. The EIS should describe how the stormwater from any project will be controlled to maintain the current water quality, volume, and rate that flows down 4 Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 the hillside. There will be significant impacts to the Black River site if the water from the several wetlands and streams running off of the hillside is diverted or altered. Mitigation measures should be required to ensure that any development does not alter the habitat below. The water that flows down this hillside from the streams and wetlands feeds into the wetlands on Tract C,the P1 Pond, Springbrook Creek, and the Green/Duwamish River. Development of the hillside would likely result in the wetland on Tract C becoming a seasonal wetland,thus significantly altering the overall habitat. Development of the hillside would result in an increase of impervious surface on the hillside, resulting in greater fluctuation of water levels during storm events and a reduction in water retention in the hillside. Toxic materials from automobiles and other vehicles, and residential/commercial use of pesticides will also likely impact the wetland in Black River unless an excellent stormwater system is installed. Water retention by the hillside during storms not only dampens the storm water peaks that are injurious to amphibians spawning in the Black River wetlands,but also retains water through the summer. f. WETLANDS: The subject property clearly intersects the eastern wetland according to the City's own Property Map Exhibit, dated December 14, 1999 (according to the Environmental Checklist, "it is difficult to tell from those maps whether any of the wetland actually lies on the subject property." [stated repeatedly, including pages 4, 6, 11]). At least one other wetland exists onsite that is apparent from SR 900, and should be delineated. g. STREAMS: Clarify the status of streams on the proposed site. Due to the presence of several culverted locations on SR 900, this indicates potential streams on the site. Maximum buffering should be applied to the streams and wetlands onsite and the buffering should not be averaged; it should be a constant,consistent buffer protecting the streams and wetlands. According to the City of Renton's Environmental Regulations, any alteration of streams is prohibited: Section 4.3.090, items 16c i and ii: Prohibited Stream Alteration. The Environmental Checklist does not call them "streams."This needs to be professionally and independently assessed. They are indeed potentially streams. The terminology in the Checklist appears to be an effort to avoid following the regulations. h. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE 4-D RULES: The rezone should take into account the proposed 4-D Rules from the National Marine Fisheries Service concerning a "take" of Chinook salmon. i. SLOPE AND SOILS INSTABILITY: The hillside consists of unstable soils. According to the Environmental Checklist, "Nearly all of the subject property is mapped 'King County Hazard" on the City's `Slide Sensitive Areas' map. The extreme east end of the site is mapped either `High' or 'Very High' on that map." Also, "The portion of the site lying south and east of the unimproved S. 140th Street right-of-way is mapped as `Erosion Hazard'." Removing the Greenbelt designation from this site represents a significant environmental impact to this site and to the Black River habitat below, as it relates to slope instability. This concern also relates to Greenbelt impacts and is therefore included in section b, above. In response to question#ld, Section B (Environmental Elements)in the Environmental Checklist (page 5), "Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe." "Unknown."is the response in the Environmental Checklist. It is not clear how this response was obtained since this contradicts King County's designation as Slide Sensitive. Prior to approval of the rezone,environmental impact studies regarding erosion should be 5 • . , Comment letter from Seattle and Rainier Audubon Societies,and Citizens for Renton Wildlands Preservation re DNS of Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone,project LUA-99-178-ECF,R,dated 4/19/2000 conducted. As per the Environmental Checklist, "Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?If so, generally describe." Response: "N/A. No development is currently proposed."The potential impacts of erosion should be studied before any project plan is submitted. This proposed rezone seems to be an ideal time to require this. j. TRAFFIC IMPACTS: The impacts of traffic will be substantial, meaning that the DNS is inadequate.Why is the City allowing the developer to base their traffic and other analyses on the minimum density allowed under the RE-1 Zoning (10 DUA)instead of requiring them to use the maximum?The numbers should be revised upward to accurately reflect the actual traffic and other impacts. k. PROTECTION OF REMAINING PRISTINE HABITAT: Studies should be conducted to evaluate how the City will ensure that remaining habitat will continue to flourish and not evolve into a plant community dominated by invasive vegetation. SYNOPSIS With these issues, we strongly feel that the rezone should not be approved. This is a very special area. Impacts from multifamily development would be so severe that mitigation is just not possible on this site. Any development on this hillside should follow prescribed guidelines for Critical Areas: First and foremost: Avoid damage. Second: Minimize damage. Last Resort: Mitigate for damage only if no other options are available. Any proposed action on this hillside should require studies evaluating all potential environmental impacts,including but not limited to those addressed in this letter. 6 .. CITY F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 30, 2000 Mr. David Halinen Halinen Law Offices, P.S. 10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 1900 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone Project No. LUA-99-178,ECF,R Dear Mr. Halinen: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on March 28, 2000, decided that this project will be issued a Determination of Non- Significance (DNS). The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, April 14, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425)430-6578. For the Environmental Review Committee, Rob t Jenkin Project Ma. er cc: Mr. Mark Gnagy; Mr. Joe Pomerleau; Mr. Ed Mallory; Mr. Craig Stone, PE/Parties of Record Mr. & Mrs. Gary Merlino/Owners Mr. & Mrs. Donald Merlino/Owners Quarry Industrial Park, LLC, do Mr. Donald Merlino/Owners rinslPttPr 1055 South Grady Way -Renton, Washington 98055 C 7 Thic nanor rnntainc'V1%rorvrlorl malorial ?not,.nnct rnncumnr CITY,-.JF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator March 30, 2000 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on March 28, 2000: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE LUA-99-178,ECF,R Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 26.01 acres of land along the south side of SR-900,from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I)from existing Employment Area Commercial and Employment Area Office; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 26.01 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA) and Commercial Office (CO) to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). Location: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM , April 14, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at (425)430-6578. For the Environmental Review Committee, Rob Jenkins Project Mana r` cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources 6 Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers 1055 South Grady Way-Renton, Washington 98055 ®This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICANT: Merlino and Quarry Industrial Park, LLC PROJECT NAME: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14)days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM ,April 14, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430 • 6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 31,2000 DATE OF DECISION: March 28, 2000 SIGNATURES: DATEl Gregg i :rman Im��or ilCI° Departm-, t •f PI ning/Building/Public Works 4r -4. 6 9(0o Jifi Shepherd,A min' trator 1t- DAT Community Services Department L( eeler, Fire C ief DATE Renton Fire Department rincgr,r, hva STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: March 28, 2000 Project Name: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone Applicant: Gary M., Donna M., Donald J and Joan P. Merlino, and Quarry Industrial Park LLC File Number: LUA-99-178, ECF, R Project Manager: Robert Jenkins, Senior Planner, EDNSP Project Description: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 26.01 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I)from existing Employment Area Commercial and Employment Area Office; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 26.01 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA)and Commercial Office (CO)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). Project Location: South side of SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 26.01 acres RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance ERC REPORT-Merlino(revised).dot 'itjJ of Renton EDNSP Department Envirc < ztal Review Committee Staff Report MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLANAMENDMENT/REZONE LUA-99-178,ECF,R REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH28,2000 Page2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: X DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. None required. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. 1. N/A. D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Animals Since there is no identified development proposal, impacts and any associated mitigation measures cannot be determined at this time. 2. -Water Since there is no identified development proposal, impacts and any associated mitigation measures cannot be determined at this time. 3. Transportation Since there is no identified development proposal, impacts and any associated mitigation measures cannot be determined at this time. However, a preliminary estimate of traffic generation impacts along SR-900 can be obtained through an analysis of trip generation for office uses,the most likely non-residential use of this site, and multi-family residential uses, as proposed. ERC REPORT-Merlino(revised).dot CV. Renton EDNSP Department Enviro ,.,= 7tal Review Committee Staff Report ER.LINO COMPREHENSIVE PLANAMENDMENT/REZONE LUA-99-178,ECF,R 'REPORT AND DECISION OF MARCH28,2000 Page3 of 3 The following trip analysis is based on the following assumptions: 1) 290,000 square feet of general office space with 967 employees; and 2) 250 multi-family dwelling units with 445 residents. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Trip Generation Manual, an office building generates an average of 3.32 weekday trips per day per employee or 11.01 weekday trips per 1000 square feet. Using our scenario, an estimated 3193-3211 weekdays trips per day would be generated by a 290,000 square foot office development on this site. The ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates an a.m. peak hour weekday trip rate of 0.48 trips per employee or 1.56 trips per 1000 square feet. Using our scenario, an estimated 453-465 weekday morning trips would be generated by an office development on this site. The ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates a p.m. peak hour weekday trip rate of 0.46 trips per employee or 1.49 trips per 1000 square feet. Using our scenario, an estimated 432-445 weekday afternoon trips would be generated by an office development on this site. The ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates an average of 0.54 Saturday trips per day per employee or 2.37 Saturday trips per day per 1000 square feet. Using our scenario, an estimated 523-688 Saturday trips would be generated by a 290,000 square foot office development on this site. Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Trip Generation Manual, an apartment development generates an average of 6.63 weekday trips per dwelling unit. Using our scenario, an estimated 1658 weekdays trips per day would be generated by a 250 unit apartment complex on this site. The ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates an a.m. peak hour of adjacent traffic weekday trip rate of 0.51 per dwelling unit. Using our scenario, an estimated 128 weekday morning trips would be generated during the peak hour morning traffic flow on SR-900. The ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates a p.m. peak hour of adjacent traffic weekday trip rate of 0.62 trips per dwelling unit. Using our scenario, an estimated 155 weekday afternoon trips would be generated during the peak hour afternoon traffic on SR-900. The ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates an a.m. peak hour weekday trip rate of 0.56 per dwelling unit. Using our scenario, an estimated 140 weekday morning trips would be generated by a 250-unit apartment complex. The ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates a p.m. peak hour of weekday trip rate of 0.67 trips per dwelling unit. Using our scenario, an estimated 168 weekday afternoon trips would be generated by a 250-unit apartment complex on this site. The ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates an average of 6.39 Saturday trips per day per dwelling unit. Using our scenario, an estimated 1598 Saturday trips would be generated by a 250-unit apartment complex on this site. Based on the above analysis, it appears that a 250-unit apartment complex would generate 52%fewer weekday trips than a 290,000 square foot office development. However, on a Saturday,the apartment complex would generate 232- 305% more trips than an office development would. The apartment complex would generate 30-31%fewer a.m. weekday peak hour trips than would the office development. The apartment complex would generate 36-37%fewer p.m.weekday peak hour trips than would the office development. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM April 14,2000(14 days from the date of publication). Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ERC REPORT-Merlino(revised).dot HALINEN LAW OFFICES,P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L.Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Seafirst Building (425)454-8272 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(425)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 / 16 e. Z (ma c • P-.. "": A 0.4,A-k 0 SR, 2'670 fr-re.6-717, PtP -e c 2e " ./Z7i.e__, 1- 6,0 14 6 ) W 1`7-?7R -t.u4 L O i l- — POi r/©A) O 7-7/1-C R-EQO6 % V64LrUG- (fir 711-- 7 Pi9--7 ^r OF --1-1-1-- /- -` ,q-T /, cvR,le-- 'V 7 L`-' Z--041-5-D P Ms, L,-1 6-t4 iv,e Llet WI a / 71-r-i-e- /1-ct,94*.s- ci_J ,W,E, ,-0--.7.0-c_74-- - -tke..., 6a es,v r 4- —c�� i-i.a Z1" -e-r, JT lrc. c-.off c� w fd�� c�.,✓ V re, (Fi C� D 1" CO�"f+��Q.t.t f %,/ Q. p( , /4-v�.,.01 ,„-- ce ,--ee r.2—raz,t/‘,Q- (tsp.-7 ci-e--z Cf—ee‘e_c:JifriLy cA_, /VI., ltsz—, pc)e--71--t‘01.-N, o 76- 1_cs'e t — / 1 cJ✓Y�at4. `Ay Zs cic. c - '---RirrarlTrr MAR 2 7 2000 P- j. "1 BUILDING DIVISION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 i.. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL' DETERMINATION a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months • RENTON,WASHINGTON prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language The Environmental Review Committee continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County (ERC)has issued a oet nmg proe der Significance for the following projectt under Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the the authority of the Renton Municipal State of Washington for King County. Code. MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County 1 AMENDMENT/REZONE Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers LUA-99-178,ECF,R during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a Environmental review for proposed cedes- 'ignation of 21.76 acres of land along the 'south side of SR-900, from approx. the Merlino Comp Plan Amendment/Rezone 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW. Appeals of the environmental determina- tion must be filed in writing on or before as published on: 3/31/00 5:00 PM,April 14, 2000.Appeals must be filed in writing together.with the required$7I The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing Exam n applicationoffeet with:- Sou Hearing g g g publicati -is the sum of$40.25, Examiner, City'of Renton, 1055 South charged to Acct. No. 805106 . Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of ,Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. Legal Number 7382 'Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,9425)-430-6510. Published in the South County Journal March 31,2000.7382 _____ - Legal Clerk, So Coun Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this 1414day of ki Q , 2000 DQQAa 9^m o p iBop _=:,:....::..°.:4:...z'''J\e,;',.`,,i'..''v:*.,;:1. ®,oteo�tl, LI e F rr°°a< ,-,.,'.,.-' 'eP;'ti0 n�! / k_ Of *, I4f. Ys. 7Lid14IqL- - • 11 : z otary Public of the State of Washington �,... • �•. d residing in Renton %s,,, z „o King County, Washington a A'Ill: O P IV\r+,'`•'i9a'a NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE LUA-99-178,ECF,R Environmental review for proposed redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM , April 14, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: March 31,2000 Account No. 51067 • dnspub • • r .1 r---1 • NOT-1-14-- - ' = • •. • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTIREZONE • LUA-99-176,ECF,R , Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 26.01 acres attend along the south side of SR-900,from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW,to Residential Multi-Family infill(RM-I)from existing Employment Area Commercial and Employment Area Office;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69;end Rezone of the 26.01 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA)and Commercial Office,(CO)to Residential MuW-Family infill(RM-I).Location:SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied in writing on or before 5:00 PM,April 14,2000.Appeals must be filed In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code SouthSection r4.6.1113. Addltlbnal information regarding he appeal ady Way,Rentdn,WA 98055. Appeals to tke rprocess may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430.6510. '..�' .o"„t7ifti��1.',• , aa' ,�°°• Meriino SR 900 Property ;k'a.• P,`;;no l _WWI.i .w''s`:8..:• • .• a I; ;b2.!g••:. 1 I,�'e b� • Comprehensive Plan Map ,�- .ns s' Amendment andRezone . . o o o4 (ii, • `�'+s• "fr: .V"o q R.Y�Ili:1�11, ,11"7,a I g. .e 3.1 }�^v' '��'dCC t1, ,., Jilt Z-Z4_ • .,.,. •1.,.1,-;. 1 1.,`. mil- ,of„ f .7,hi.7 eo ii ' i' - bar-,f'-:,° °'^: .r a. ' • •,r: ,•..`',. ,;-F-----,-, ----:::-" -ii...:.., `".a,. i-:',.. ..t...,..#7. - FOR FURTHER INFORMASERV ICES DIV SIICONTACT THE ON AT(425)4310-7 00TY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I' Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. ° CERTIFICATION I, Avid v, .e, De t3ci &I uJ , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me m 3 conspicuous places on or nearby k I;Iprw H e 1 to the described property on .nil a-r c.I^ 31 f 2,0 on 1 0'11.4. ,. Signed: , ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a No Public in and for the State of Washington residing fir `tc�tti ,iN , on the ! day of a `P �- '_ '(r RILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC c� �"}1 ,f STATL OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION EXPIRES ti JUNE 29, 2003 MARILYN KAMOHEFF NT/APPOINTMENT EXPIRES: 6.-29-03 , 401..tc.,1E , , . :, , ., ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE LUA-99-178,ECF,R Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 26.01 acres of land along the south side of SR-900,from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW,to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I)from existing Employment Area Commercial and Employment Area Office;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69;and Rezone of the 26.01 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA)and Commercial Office,(CO)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). Location:SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM,April 14,2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to t(ie Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Sectior)•'4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. S' f1ar o, 0",mar`' 45; e�i, ,T b �o_ _. "° "'( , � ,„•,s. ' Merhno SR 900 Property ,� '13; Comprehensive Plan Map i .. „.. '- F \, i. ,�,:, -, ,;� :wi ° ,nv47,; o a- = Amendment and Rezone : ?"'° � r is •c �o .. �f�o• • ` ;�i ,• Y i VI.:.•, DL�n�O• 1 `tl �D i __� -- _ — --- — am u tz '' ,ci 4'' •I• ' a -;a .� '°�''-f.4 'a. t. 'b..q l;. _ i ;,�•i IO mt f,'�4 ev.�. ae• d �Q�e�o•� S 7te>4 a .. .. ��\�taL4 J, ..l ,...:.,,, �.' : � �'., i.xw.'ter„ • I • �'.. FT., .�, ,L„• 2�r'3 :_ • , 1 43� �t)d �::I-.a 41-4 �F .. •r O Q •7••• •�' ' r.^o. - _ `i—'tea'--`_ .0 un .n`�d.j 2, 4 r , m Q.6:.f i _ .. "*..,, - e> m`, .I :Ic`• ,1�' M ._ m 9 0, 0' h ,,;� ram,. �� _ ..,: . r. s: - . .. «.'T .P :�.. i,, . ,. :I-v, .I' 4,, L' 'anon'1 c es,c W 4 i =e • rtip.; 4•I 'y'hr' •;,. ,m S� ! , pa'i__;Ti•4 :. ..Pr1�,•.• t. r a, 'yyy� r , F .. • /7' i¢'�,P �• 2,1 (Proposed) •, r;�o: .,,. . o/ .•�,,, _ f I a 7 i ' I, tlq•.u•nal • pY •,',/��,c7 •.' • .1 •••o` 'r e I 1 H — �d0; moo : .� :,� _ - \ �r . . I''‘• :!'•:.,:S y :°.o oN .e 4. n,'' 'ii �, ?r 10 � - 1 /�1 6 a - . 4rp•rr ^t 0:,, g•.i6ti^' r to ••// "am' �•", t•...-.... r' �CO I 'I CO. .--. ' ""'-'14'` 51' a '2 ,,, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ,: ' Please include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file identification. \ ` HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. A Professional Service Corporation David L Halinen,P.E. Bellevue Place/Bank of America Bldg. (425)454-8272 davidhalinen@halinenlaw.com 10500 NE 8th,Suite 1900 Fax(425)646-3467 Bellevue,Washington 98004 March 6, 2000 U lY Or EN,Tq 'CIS ; HAND-DELIVERED MAR 0 6 2000 I ► S City of Renton Department of Economic Development and BUILDING D.�/►„IU Neighborhood Strategic Planning 1055 S. Grady Way, Sixth Floor Renton, Washington 98055 Attn: Robert Jenkins, Senior Planner RE: Merlino SR 900 Property Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone City of Renton File No. LUA 99-178, ECF,R,CPA(00M7 and 00T4) Corrected Legal Description Dear Rob: After corresponding with Bob Mac Onie and Sonja Fesser concerning the legal description, - I herewith enclose 12 copies of the corrected legal description for the above-referenced application. This new legal description accounts for the long-ago vacation of Beacon Coal Mine Road through the property, which we were previously unaware of. Please phone me if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, HALINEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. David L. Halinen Enclosure cc: Robert Mac Onie, P.L.S., City of Renton Department of Building/Planning/Public Works (with copy of enclosure) Sonja Fesser, City of Renton Department of Building/Planning/Public Works (with copy of enclosure) SCHEDULE A-4 POLICY NO. 365862-5K THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7 AND! THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF SUNSET HIGHWAY (PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2) AND NORTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, AND SAINT PAUL RAILWAY CO. AND PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. ; INCLUDING BOTH (1) VACATED SOUTH 140TH STREET (AKA BEACON COAL MINE ROAD) LYING WITHIN SAID PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7 AND WITHIN SAID PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER PURSUANT TO VACATION UNDER KING COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' JOURNAL VOLUME 29, PAGE 3 AND (2) THE VACATED PORTION OF 82ND AVENUE SOUTH LYING WITHIN SAID PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER. EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER LYING SOUTH OF A LINE DRAWN FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 15 OF BLOCK 13 OF SAID PLAT OF EARLINGTON AND RUNNING THENCE WESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 1250 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND SAINT PAUL RAILWAY CO. AND OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. SAID. POINT BEING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACKS OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. AT A POINT THEREIN DISTANCE ABOUT 2050 FEET WESTERLY MEASURED ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. AS NOW LOCATED ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; AND SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. J-10/92 jg PAGE 4 Of 4 Washington State Northwest Region Firm Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133-9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 February 8, 2000 Rob Jenkins City of Renton "s Cis - Development Services Division r° 1055 S Grady Way �E� 1 0 2000 r Renton, WA 98055-3232 ECONOPIIC NEIGDEVE(O�wENT, .Y RE: SR 900, MP 8.77 to MP 9.35, CS 1713 Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone Land Use No.: LUA-99-178,ECF,R Dear Mr. Jenkins: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the Notice of Application for the Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone,which is located on SR 900 between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW. We request a traffic study be prepared to analyze the state intersections that are impacted by ten or more of the project's generated peak hour trips and also determine what mitigation measures, if any,would be required. If you have any questions,please call John Collins at(206) 440-4915. Sincerely, Craig J. Stone, P.E. Area Administrator- South King CJS:jc JTC cc: file Wi Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North P.O. Box 330310 Sid Morrison Seattle,WA 98133 9710 Secretary of Transportation (206)440-4000 February 25, 2000 OEM C ry MEM�" it lr 1ING Rob Jenkins FEB 2 8v City of Renton Development Services Division RECbrV�:• 1055 S Grady Way Renton, WA 98055-3232 • RE: SR 900, MP 8.77 to MP 9.35, CS 1713 • Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone Land Use No.: LUA-99-178,ECF,R Dear Mr. Jenkins: Earlier we wrote asking that a traffic study be conducted to assess the impacts this project would have on state highways and to determine what mitigation might be needed as a result of those impacts. Since that time, we have spoken with David Halinen, an attorney representing the developer. Mr. Halinen pointed out that this proposed action is merely a rezone; the actual development will be proposed after the rezone is granted. We concur with his opinion that the traffic study is premature. We would ask that a study be prepared for the subsequent development of the property instead. If you have any questions,please call John Collins at(206) 440-4915. Sincerely, FO/L Craig J. Stone, P.E. Area Administrator- South King CJS:jc JTC • cc: file David Halinen, Attorney at Law DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENT• ON FEB 2 8 2000 RECEIVED • C2/11/*LICUU •14:CM JOU-MIL-40 fp T op dote.vre,41444, , 9",ifeee'e , tOG'G7 44>?!.411141' . . . • • PArdeZZ 221.a44-Ale.CIL! . .60.1.027,24,e1J klehpeela#11; haYar2.14?-14-444ligeL f-4"-'11;111 • • .. .4141er4110 khr I . 214a-de:* U.A q 7.1 . . . . 10-t '& &-.. / ,67`t fr /,71-414--141,r741 dweeze)"1-2-) .(4/-7-ta.6 /rAt44.4.-. 47PbZ 1 & 446. •40./,-14 Za-i' r7n7., il•C-/2 If• e • A‘44/41141,e . ‘12,.04.4-0t lad44 rA"M41 111,112d- erj1W %. 7ge.Orrit 17. i-p;e4,44.4•4, eet,n4 ditvellifi• -at. YizetialdtAlvi7 4 ,#(4d)04,714-ove41,04-. 4.46::141 4t-pl.i/otqa.e.z.flt-1;4.41-4-irrt cox.a.r.t.4.&ac .44-e;t€444/.4 . ,414g.4714. 4 ke‘iceAlk,• £1;404:4-1-,z, 44112eArg-4/ 11,2/ etoytrreve;1 ,e.41414.4- nte 14441#11/red dopriaiirieebitia44-td,;v141/ • ••• • - • • • — tL/iII/ rJ 19:rJa so === COVER PAGE === TO : FAX : 14254307300 FROM : C C GNAGY FAX : 3H--8 2--4b78 TEL : 3E --8O2--4E78 COMMENT : ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIS JAN 3 1 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, INTRODUCTION NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the word "project", "applicant", and "property or site" should be read as. "proposal," "proposer", and "affected geographic area," respectively. • Page 1 2068/001/COMP-I'LAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CI IECKLIST-1.Fl.doc;01/31/00 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Merlino SR 900 Property Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone (a non project action) 2. Name of applicant(s): Gary M. Merlino and Donna M. Merlino; Donald J. :Merlino..and Joan P. Merlino; and Quarry Industrial Park, LLC, a Washington limited liability company 3. Address and phone number of applicant(s) and contact person: Applicant: Contact Person: Donald J. Merlino David L. Halinen c/o Stoneway Concrete Halinen Law Offices, P.S. 1915 Maple Valley Highway 10500 N.E.8th Street, Suite 1900 Renton, WA 98055 Bellevue, WA 98004 (425) 226-1000 (425) 454-8272 4. Date checklist prepared: January 31, 2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: • City of Renton Department of Economic Development and Neighborhood&Strategic Planning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The proposed Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone are anticipated to be processed by the City by June 2000. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Multi family residential development of the property consistent with the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone is contemplated in future years but is not part of this proposed non project action. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The City of Renton issued a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan'$Land Use Element (dated January 16, 1992) and a two-volume Final Page 2 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CI-IECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 .11 • Environmental Impact Statement for the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Element(dated February 1, 1993). 9. Do you know, whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be:needed for your proposal, if known. Renton City Council approval of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions"later in. this.checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need•to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include.additionalspecific information on project description.) The. Applicants request the following changes to the subject property's existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations and Zoning classifications: (a) An amendment of the property's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations from Employment Area Commercial (EAC) (which encompasses approximately 17.54 acres, including 3.14 acres of unimproved S. 1406 Street right-of-way), Employment Area Office (EAO) (which encompasses approximately 8.47 acres) and Rural Residential (RR)) (which encompasses approximately 1.08 acres) to Residential Multi Family Inftll (RM- I); and (b) An amendment of the property's Zoning Classifications from Arterial Commercial (CA) (prezoned), Commercial Office (CO), and Resource Conservation (RC) to Residential Multi Family Inftll The Applicants also request the following text amendment to existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policy LU-69 (with the proposed additional text illustrated by underlining): (Proposed Amender!) Policy LU-69. Residential Multi family Inftll designations should not be expanded (Application of this designation to properties lying between parcels that already have this designation shall not be considered an inappropriate "expansion" but, rather, an acceptable "infill".) Land within the districts should be used efficiently to meet multi family housing needs. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of yqur proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, Page 3 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-A,ti1GNDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.Pl.doc;01/31/00 . • township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The 27.09-acre subject property (which includes 3.14 acres of the unimproved S. 140th Street right-of-way that runs from west to east through the property) is:located on the south side of SR 900 (known as "Martin Luther King, Jr. Way S." in.unincorporated:King.County and "S.W. Sunset Boulevard" in the City of Renton) from approximately 76th Avenue S. (based on unincorporated King County addressing) on the west to Thomas Ave.'S.W. (based on Renton addressing) on the east. The site currently lies partially in unincorporated King County and partially within the City of Renton. A legal description of the subject property is attached to the Land Use Permit Master Application form submitted with the request along with a Property Map Exhibit and a Neighborhood Detail Map depicting the boundaries of the subject property 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the,City's Comprehensive.Land Use Policy Plan map as environmentally sensitive? The City's "Potential Wildlife Areas, Forest, Open Spaces.and Wetlands Map" and "Lakes, Rivers &Streams, Wetlands &Stream Reach Labels" map both depict a wetland along part of the easterly portion of the subject property's south boundary. (It is difficult to tell from those two maps whether any of the wetland actually lies on the subject property. The wetland appears to either (a) lie entirely offsite near that part of the subject property's south boundary or (b) slightly encroach onto the subject property while lying primarily offsite.) Nearly all of the subject property is mapped "King County Hazard" on the City's "Slide Sensitive Areas" map. (The extreme east end of the site is mapped either "High" or "Very High"on that map.) Nearly all of the subject property is mapped as Greenbelt. The portion of the site lying south and east of the unimproved S. 140h Street right-of-way is mapped as "Erosion Hazard". B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope is approximately 70% (at the southeastern portion of the site). Page 4 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The 1973 King County Soil Survey (prepared by. USDA' Soil Conservation Service) maps the site's soils as "BeD" (Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes). d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unknown. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None proposed at this time. Application is for CPA and rezone only. f. Could erosion occur as:a result-of clearing; construction, or. use? If so, generally describe. N/A. (No development is currently proposed) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? N/A. (No development is currently proposed) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: N/A 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. N/A. (No development is currently proposed.) b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known , Page 5 . 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: N/A. (No development is currently proposed) 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in;the 'immediate'vicinity of the site (including .year-round and seasonal streams, -saltwater, :lakes,. ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. An intermittent drainage course runs from north to south approximately 1100 feet west of the site's extreme southeastern corner. A storm,drain pipe,from abutting SR 900 (which transports runoff from .the:. existing :single-family..residential neighborhood lying north of.SR 900) discharges into:that drainage course. That .drainage course appears to discharge into the area that is mapped as a wetland on the City's "Potential Wildlife Areas, Forest, Open Spaces and.Wetlands Map" and "Lakes, Rivers & Streams, Wetlands & Stream Reach Labels".map along part of the easterly portion of the subject property's south boundary..=:(It is difficult to tell from those maps whether any of the wetland actually lies on the subject property. The wetland appears to either (a) lie entirely offsite near that part of the subject property's south boundary or (b) slightly encroach onto the subject property while lying primarily offsite.) 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. N/A. (No development is currently proposed) 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A. (No development is currently proposed) 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. N/A. (No development is currently proposed) 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. • Page 6 2068/001/COMP-PLAN=AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-I.Fl.doc;01/31/00 • No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. • b. Ground: 1) Will ground 'water be withdrawn, or will water be:,:discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose 'and approximate,quantities if known. N/A 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged'into they:ground irom'.septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: ' Domestic:sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals....; agriculturaketc.).._Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems; the.,number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans'the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. N/A. (No development is currently proposed) However,future development will require preparation and City of Renton approval of an onsite storm water plan 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: N/A. (No development is currently proposed) 4. Plants a. Check or underline types of vegetation found on the site: X_ deciduous tree: alder, maple,'aspen, other: X evergreen tree: firr, cedar, pine, other: Page 7 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.P1.doc;01/31/00 X shrubs _X_ grass pasture wet soil plants: .cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will beremoved or altered? N/A. (No development is currently proposed) c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: NM. (No development is currently proposed) 5. Animals a. Underline any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows and miscellaneous small birds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: squirrels, chipmunks, raccoons fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: N/A Page 8 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CI IECKLIST-1.P1.doc;01/31/00 • • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. N/A. (No development is currently proposed.) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal: List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. Application is for CPA and rezone only. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including •exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N/A. (No development is currently proposed) 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A. (No development is currently proposed) 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. Application is for CPA and rezone only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? An existing railroad line abuts most of the site's south boundary. The southerly portion of the site's west edge abuts the east edge of the Black River Quarry, which is owned by the applicants of the subject property. Noise from the mining and recycling activities on that site currently exist. Mining of the Quarry property is nearing completion, however. Page 9 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.Fl.doc;01/31/00 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Traffic noise and other noise commonly associated with a multi family residential development would ultimately be created by such a development on .the-subject property. However, no development is being proposed at•this time. (Application is for CPA and rezone only.) 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise:impacts, if any: N/A 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant. To the west of the site (in unincorporated King County,) along the south edge.of SR 900 lies an approximately 300-unit_apartment complex called the Empire Estates Apartments. To the east of the site (in the.City of Renton) along the south edge of SR 900 lies another multi-family residential development called the Sun Pointe Townhomes. Across SR 900 to the north lie developed single-family residential subdivisions in both unincorporated King County (west of 80t Avenue S.) and the City of Renton (east of 80t Avenue S.). An existing railroad line and right-of- way abuts most of the site's south boundary. The southerly portion of the site's west edge abuts the east edge of the Black River Quarry property, which is owned by the applicants of the subject property. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? None. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The site's current zoning is Arterial Commercial (CA) (prezoned) (which encompasses approximately 17.54 acres of the site, including 3.14 acres of unimproved S. 140th Street right-of-way), Commercial Office (CO) (which encompasses approximately 8.47 Page 10 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 acres of the site), and Resource Conservation (RC) (which encompasses approximately 1.08 acres of the site). f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Employment Area Commercial (EAC) (which encompasses approximately 17.54 acres of the site, .including 3.14 acres of unimproved. S. 140h Street. right-of-way), Employment Area Office (EAO) (which encompasses.approximately 8.47 acres of the site) and Rural Residential.(RR)) (which encompasses approximately 1 08 acres of the • site) g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally.sensitive":;.area? If so, specify. The City's "Potential Wildlife Areas, Forest, Open.Spaces-and-Wetlands Map" and "Lakes, Rivers & Streams, - Wetlands & -Stream.Reach.Labels" -map both• depict a wetland along part of the easterly portion of the subject property's south boundary. (It is difficult to tell from those two maps whetherr any of the wetland actually lies.on the subject property. r The wetland appears to either (a) lie entirely offsite near that part of the subject property's south boundary or (b) slightly encroach onto the subject property while lying primarily offsite.) Nearly all of the subject property is mapped "King County Hazard" on the City's "Slide Sensitive Areas" map. (The extreme east end of the site is mapped either "High"or "Very High"on that map.) • Nearly all of the subject property is mapped as Greenbelt. The portion of the site lying south and east of the unimproved S. 140th Street right-of- way is mapped as "Erosion Hazard". i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Unknown at this time. Application is for CPA and rezone only. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? • None. • k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. • Page 11 . 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CIIECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Amendments to the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan are sought. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if°any?:Indicate:whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Unknown at this time. Application is for CPA and rezone only. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? = Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Unknown at this time. Application is for CPA and rezone only. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? • Unknown at this time. Application is for CPA and rezone only. (However, because the site is currently wooded, which obstructs views from the higher properties lying to the north, development of the site is not anticipated to obstruct views from the north.) c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No aesthetic impacts are anticipated 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur. Page 12 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 Unknown at this time. Application is for CPA and rezone only. (Lighting typical of a multi family residential development would ultimately result, such as parking lot lighting during the night.) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with. views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may..affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities..are in the immediate vicinity? Skyway Park (King County), Bryn Mahr Park (King County).and Earlington Park are all are located within about a 1-mile radius of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any? City of Renton parks impact fees would be paid in conjunction with development of the site. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. • Page 13 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.Fl.doc;01/31/00 None. • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and.highways serving the site, and describe.proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. SR 900 lies along the entire north edge of the site. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, Metro Transit currently serves SR 900. A transit stop is.approximately...700 feet to the west of the subject property. c. How many parking spaces would:the'completed:project.have? How many would the project eliminate? The number of parking spaces that a completed development of the site would have is unknown at this time. No parking spaces would be eliminated. (Application is for CPA and rezone only.) d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. An existing rail line runs along most of the site's south boundary. (The rail line will not serve the site. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown at this time. Application is for CPA and rezone only. Page 14 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: City of Renton traffic impact fees would be paid in conjunction with actual development of the subject property. 15. Public Services a. .Would the project result in an increased need for..public services,(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care,schools,other)?..If_so,generally.describe. Application is for CPA and rezone only.:. Ultimate:.development_olthe.site,pursuant.to approval of the request wold result in an increased need for public services. • b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Fire Department impact fees would be paid in conjunction'with;actual.development of the subject property. 16. Utilities a. .Underline utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All utilities are available to the site through a proper extension of services. Extension of services will be the developers'responsibility at the time of ultimate development. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity will be provided by Puget Sound Energy Natural Gas will be provided by Puget Sound Energy Water Service will be provided by the City of Renton Sanitary Sewer will be provided by the City of Renton Telephone Service will be provided by US West According to David Christensen, Utility Engineering Supervisor of the City of Renton Waste Water Section, the existing City of Renton 12-inch diameter sewer main in 68`h Avenue South (to the west of the site) has adequate capacity to provide sewer service for multi-family-residential development of the subject property. (The Applicants own the abutting property between the subject site and 68th Avenue South and will be able to construct a connecting sewer main between 68th Avenue South and the subject site.) According to Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor of the City of Renton Utilities Division, (a) the,subject property lies within the City's water service area, (b) a 12-inch Page 15 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.P1.doc;01/31/00 • • I diameter main lies in SR 900 approximately as far west as Powell Avenue SW, (c) an existing 16-inch diameter line lies in 68th Avenue South (to the west of the site), and(d) suitable connection(s) to these lines should provide adequate water service to the subject property. C. SIGNATURE • The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: (-2 Hal P. Grubb,P.E., Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. • Date Submitted: January 31, 2000 • • • Page 16 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions). Non-project actions are those that do not include a specific project. A non-project action may be a rezone, annexation, or amendments to ordinances. For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to-read them-in:conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent of the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal that would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented..::Respond .briefly.and in.general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning are very similar,-in intensity of allowed use to the existing Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning already applicable to about 96% of the site. Development under the proposed designation and zoning will not lead to significantly increased discharge to water, emissions to air or production of noise as compared to development that could occur under the current Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning. Uses permitted under the proposed categories will not produce, store or release toxic or hazardous substances. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: None proposed since the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezone will ultimately result in uses of similar intensity to uses previously allowed by the City for the subject property under the existing Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning would not be anticipated to affect plants, animals, fish or marine life to any different degree than the' existing Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: When development of the site ultimately occurs pursuant to the proposed zoning, erosion control and water quality/stormwater detention/retention facilities will be required per City regulations. Page 17 206 WOO 1/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 i 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Future development of the site pursuant to the proposed zoning will have approximately the same impact on energy and natural resources as allowed under the current Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning category. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None required beyond adherence to City energy codes. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentallrsensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Development setbacks from the wetland along part of the easterly portion:_of:thersubject properly's south boundary would be required under the City's wetland protection regulations. During the review of a particular development proposal for the subject.property, _a:geotechnical study by qualified professionals would be required to evaluate-appropriate development conditions in relation to the site's mapping as a slide hazard area and the portion of the site mapped as an erosion hazard area. Currently-anticipated changes to the City's Envirionmentally Sensitive Areas regulations will eliminate the City's Greenbelt designation. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: See prior paragraph. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning is identical to the existing Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning of the properties lying to both the west and the east of the subject property. No significant affect upon land and shoreline use is anticipated by the proposed Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Site Plan Review will be required for any development proposal ultimately brought forward 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Page 18 2068/001/COMP-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CHECKLIST-1.F1.doc;01/31/00 • 1 Demands on transportation and public services and utilities from future development in accordance with the proposed Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning would be very similar in intensity to such demands stemming from development of the subject property under the existing Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning. =No'significant increase in demand for these services is anticipated Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None. 7. Identify, if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The proposal is not anticipated to conflict with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. • Page 19 2068/00 1/COM P-PLAN-AMENDMENT/ENV-CI IECKLIST-1.FI.doc;01/31/00 City of I n Department of Planning/Building/Public , ,;ks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ro,AeD COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21,2000 APPLICANT: Merlino PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jenkins PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78637 LOCATION: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW SITE AREA: 21.76 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land alongthe south side of SR-900, from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW,to Residential Multi-Family.Infill (RM-1 from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy. LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office (CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS • Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing ' Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health S<e —>c" Public Services Energy/ ><- Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet xr7;54€547C; Tj cf).7 UGa� icarige a /110.c (ram-G� )J AN _,ram ,,r-n, . B. POLICY-RELATED MEN /l-6 ) 12iL C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS �� , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0Yr/ ignature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of F ._. 'in Department of Planning/Building/Public __ ks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ipo1(f00Vr COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21,2000 APPLICANT: Merlin° PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jenkins • PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone . WORK ORDER NO: 78637 LOCATION: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW SITE AREA: 21.76 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW,to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM4)from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office (CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth I Housing , Air i Aesthetics Water I Light/Glare I Plants I Recreation I Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS N ji. C. ,CODE-RELATED COMMENTS l~'` We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. er o llatatail zs, 24900 Signatu of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 999J LL Mark S.Gnagy r, r fEB 321 Powell Ave SW—Renton,WA 98056-2254�USA �� Telephone/Fax(425)235-8123—Email markgnome@msn.com ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS Sl'RATEGC PNI�ING January 31, 2000 Rob Jenkins Project Manager Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Dept. 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Jenkins: I am writing to comment on the proposed Merlino SR900 Property Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone. Project number: LUA-99.178, ECF, R.As a'homeowner with,property that abuts the subject property I feel that this proposed action would have a profound effect on me and my neighbors. I am opposed to rezoning this property to allow multi-family construction for many reasons. I feel that the current zoning is correct in that it reflects the planning set forth by our city staff and leadership and best fulfills the needs of the city and it's residents. The Commercial Arterial (CA) zoning as has been applied to the portion of the proprty along SR900 should not be changed. This city has already lost a significant amount of vacant property that had been zoned as CA to multi-family developments. With a limited amount of arterial frontage, it should be preserved for commercial development as already planned. The western boundary of this property is near the Herron rookery that has created quite a stir in the past few years. Because of this, large scale development should be avoided in this area. I am certain that the owner of the subject property feels that with RM-I zoned properties to both the north and south of this property that RM-I would best suit this property too. However, the greatest amount of boundary is with property that is zoned R-8. Such a large multi-family development in close proximity to single-family neighborhoods will have significant negative impacts. Such impacts have already occurred since the construction of the Avalon.Ridge and Plum Tree Court apartment complexes to the south of this property. As an example, I have noticed a big increase in traffic through our neighborhood, heading to and from these apartments. Adding more multi-family development will just add to the problem. Finally, I can understand the property owners'desire to maximize the return on the investment in this property by having the_zoning.changed to allow large scale development. I feel that the city should have a different vision. Our city already has the nickname "arm pit of the county" (as well as others). Further multi-family development will do nothing but increase this stigma. I feel that we should not seek the short term gratification of one big development, but rather the long term stability that comes from single-family neighborhoods. I am not opposed to ALL.development. I feel that we should develop wisely. The city's'comprehensive plan was designed to allow wise development. I can see no reason to allow this change and rezone. Sincerely, Mark S. Gnagy Uv City of RE::._a Department of Planning/Building/Public I�_ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C c1 5 c,c.e.o COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21,2040e�pt4 oF APPLICANT: Merlino PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jen insAimr.FIVFn PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78637 JAtv GI TOM LOCATION: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW 1v SITE AREA: 21.76 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): Nj1..i)1LU1N DIVISION SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I)from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy, LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office (CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /V0710- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Ar0 NU; We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whe dditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. //2_77.0--o S' ature of Dire o Aut res p a Dat Routing Rev.10/93 City of A; n Department of Planning/Building/Public , ks • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: SVky1/4flu_c.elg`C� r COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R 1 DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21,2000 erpy APPLICANT: Merlino PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jenkins .REM'ON PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78637 : I1/ O LOCATION: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW jAA9 2'7 2000 SITE AREA: 21.76 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A --L AN G Opl/18' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land alongthe south side of SR-9' from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill.(RM-1)from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS i C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS No cOWIK4QwL • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ed 1/1)a "/i/v Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of :n Department of Planning/Building/Public _aka ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT yokla.cu p COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21,2000aip. _Rernow APPLICANT: Merlino PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jenkins =91/pf4 kAitif PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78637 . . 2 72000 LOCATION: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW �Ly,4•1,,N0��VISjO N SITE AREA: 21.76 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW,to Residential Multi-Family.Infill (RM-I)from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office (CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family.Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Jo GoWtWI I, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. e" GU&ij 1-/lod Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of R _- v Department of Planning/Building/Public cs • ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COodar-COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21,2000 APPLICANT: Merlino PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jenkins CrfY oF Raw pN PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78637 LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW SITE AREA: 21.76 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A , Ai 2Uau SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan red t ignation of 21.76 acres of land along dflitalLsi( f•'o �e0, from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, o Residential Multi-Family,Infill (RM-I)from existingm: .{ 'ent Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to resi•ential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Nv co frto We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ✓/WZ 2/► /o v Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of F',_ _ --n Department of Planning/Building/Public ,-rs ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 6Ve_ P i uv- lcnh COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21,2000 APPLICANT: Merlino PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jenkins , _ m PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78637 Lam, . LOCATION: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW J A N 2 7 7000 SITE AREA: 21.76 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A „ , l ll � ur �tt�� v FIRE SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land alongthe soui`h side of SR-9d�, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family,Infill (RM-E)from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of.Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office (CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural - Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ��(/� !VG / 'O/" A dG7L /lJDI�f -6 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS )) C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS p 1( We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a ditional information is ed to properly assess this proposal. /,tom, (//7/0 Signature q Director or Authorized R pre tative Date Routing v Rev.10/93 City WO Department of Planning/Building/Pubs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (te_,061 COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21,2000 APPLICANT: Merlino PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jenkins PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78637 LOCATION: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW SITE AREA: 21.76 acres I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-l)from existing Employment _ Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office (CO)and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water - Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • l V COk Geilfra4A16v1PIALS 0,(z Q,SSUGeG � 6v/ I OS - G U CITYVV044— We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. G t7 a " 41("00 • nature of Dir o Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of n Department of Planning/Building/Public cs —1-6 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 0II Lc COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 4, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-99-178,ECF,R DATE CIRCULATED: JANUARY 21, 2000 APPLICANT: Merlino PROJECT MANAGER: Rob Jenkins PROJECT TITLE: Merlino CPA/Rezone WORK ORDER NO: 78637 LOCATION: SR-900, between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW SITE AREA: 21.76 acres BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-l)from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA), Commercial Office (CO) and Resource Conservation (RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ap a _r. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Re resientative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • .- I Used For Project Mitigation: At Uve proposal,the amendments are not subject to development U�qY �� rel. Future development Nat may occur in the affected area under its • RP'=r .•J would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations Including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development • 4• regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,Infrastructure ,,A standards,etc.Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other rLCiN�� applicable regulations. • Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 • PM on FeWaary-0.„2055 Eebruary 16,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of ItE1(($ED„-;EXTENSION:OF COMMENT.DEADLINE record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430.6578 DATE: January-26rZOOS February 2,2000 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-9g-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of • SR-900,from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW,to Residential Multi-Family Inflll(RM-I)from existing Employment Area Commercial,Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infitl policy LU-69;and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial . '-"" __ , (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Inflll(RM-I). rJ A.••' P., P; pj�yy 41 c� L'_ -=• --..-, PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW ' ;'•ei:l5-:-i. °� 'a,5t 5.�' NE tt}�[r,,,��...��y Merlino SR 900 Property _ OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton +�;Q T;,�;'( �+1Hi�-- is `QT- ° x Comprehensive Plan Map F�°o� 'VI'' � has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as .1RY'C•iC•'• 7 ••m' .•�� r 0,.-44E C permitted under the RCW 43.21C,110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- ®� - •c•° �,•.•I S „a Amendment and Rezone a}q,a; —•••' • M is likely to be issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment - ^"'_ - _ j c:C".,, Io period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance ,c{"=`r9'4 •'b',0 i^ °~ Mitigated(DNS-M).A 14-day appeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. _ `') is ,R1°. I .'` into, ^0 PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: • December 15,1999 tam, -_-• _ �o,"q-'• e'• 'b'N i st( R6rIN • c-t-v,--'1-.,. —N NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: Janeary23r-2000 February YN�t ._ I Febm 2,2000 �_� '1�j9-'� hot'+i..•i; �{�L»i�a . vj.,..( ,.;¢.�x'. . {. .\'.' t R 4�m.o.: I'1 ! I ' I Ile 61 -'i'•• '1•''�Y OPEi� Y�L. '.Lr t \K�- ..,i,11.'Si.4 II e •6\1 I .r• eon n.e*_�_ PermILUReview Requested: Environmental n,City Review,Planning Commission public hearing and Ir..w+•— 2 m �� p 1�e,{�n.; �• i1n 10 a,• r,'+• •II recommendation,City Council approval. .,• i ..' ° " ` o -- ., Other Permits which may be required: None. Nit I21'2. •4,1 e p qp o ,o195.. ;i 'Tr+r••-•'•' °�.i]_,,,.2,•• Requested Studies: None. • • ;4 jG�`�' ' `h}• '-:•:.' r"";�' ?' .;•T-"•' f1Ai 11'. _6%:' 7 .r;_. 1� .L off q -+n o. .�' ^"' ,.... ! a.,gp D °hT'•"�,•a� FFk, Location where application may -,w r , !Ir II ..^ °.G: '� < E ' �', ti- be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public '•- °.t ail r` ! l I°- Works Division,Development Services Department, �'�� / :`u 1055 South Grad Way,Renton,WA 98055 \ �\� - -� -�(Proposed) 'd-'d ' Y Y 'V .,. :.�.: a 9�•�y.-", ��-''�tl: + • + , u-•,w.wr •,,,! .`. i 4 '.+' , to PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,In Renton ( ' 'H -"':"y .. °`}•'a�._",C,7�, '"'.u'.;: Council Chambers,The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. I '•'C ro� 6e''....1 �••°_'f1 v,`.:w r,II For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic O we n+.•° �'r co •�••.°9�,,,,,i/.••••,+ o° e r-, Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- �•r'O ' Y - �P"`Y al ', j,.•. '�r7 r°'�' 6578.All parties of record will receive notification. t �-a.�° I�'"61f•° 1�"''r CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: ',• .4r °. I - ;,,,, y'0��tl tip'�-�L� •,� 1 Vi Analytical process . • f'�-'� „".. t jl w'p;• ^trbe.,, - - Project consistency refers to whether a protect is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in z' a i' - RC • y °' "y. _•-, i -tj15,:�'JQ':�S'�''F ;} their absence,comprehensive plan policies.RCW 36.708.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)Include %;'•„.�' t•";/' =v .,CO,' li a`1;ff c rLr• -`, a statement of the preliminary determination of a roject's consistency with the `A,-, r7•,7.?7:_"P rY o I cy type of land use,level of development, 1 e^ ' CO``•. ,yam 1... infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice.At a minimum,every NOA shall ��,�:,^R �P)_.- :I _ 7",��1++' •Include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. I�L4 s� .+ _ y� r•I r� .Pys _` - ..— _ Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this " '``"" - f non-project application.This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan If "i, \� -• ,-,\4\IM" @.t designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the --«�-- ._ j -;1 i•.,,_`P'. �r project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density —' " ^-;-h-f• _. ••-•n - .h residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Inflll(RM.I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August-2546WT January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA.99-17a ENV.NOTICE LUA-99.1 Te ENV.NOTICE CERTIFICATION_ I, er6 J C -',-s , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above do ument were posted by me in i conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on .Sim �ioW, cL , -c ,— :,7.../ Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed and worn before me,a Nortary Pu ic, ' an for State of • Washington residing in Virt-Q-44-15._,_ ,on the I et. l y of _ 4,r • `Zo-s-a • MARILYN KAMCHEFF `------2-2-7 -/- NOTARY UBLIC j STATE OF WASHINGTON MARILYN KAMCHEFF • COMMISSION EXPIRES ,' MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 JUNE 29,2003 . •NT0 • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) �2EN�S.ED 'EriENpioNDF,COMMENT_DEADLINE DATE: January 26,-200A February 2,200001\14j1b1iL LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R W Si APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE " C) 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of 0` SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) from existing . Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial �S (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I).. (IA PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January-2-1,2000 February 2,.2000 Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall • include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated Auguct 25,1997 January 31,2000. Development Regulations LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE U‘sed.For�'roject Mitigation: As a legislati Iposal,the amendments are not subject to developn - - regulations. . ......e development that may occur in the affected area L.•_ its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on Februa+y-S,-•2000 February,16,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION _ ,, ... . I C7 __ I . ar• 8'6.,- t '0 i 'm•• O , d fi I w I I I` _-...-:-! __,.- 8E q. ►�%J { i j P • i�• . 1CG• auk, '�....Its;. ;i ; P,b.3151 d1.g1' i•, �,�.- • NE p 1-.�- 8;..,.a _; Merlino SR 900 Propertyi °4..a: , 1 AI'vi _,;.,• a n f,• „,r ,a? '° ` Comprellensive Plan Map 1 oQo �•- o';ice '' :a • ° .: n . AImpmendment and Rezone J. . : '4:°I v °: ---"" Ellq ;ot ..TwACTs[m pb lo, se u' v5•t�.i•[/�'*ro%�R� IO,IIbN• � I ui :•• 'I' `�;4 =? '-t' •�l/k :Y'� .. ji • `'1`1_ .F. NO-:j/ Li_ .� s 7" -Sr Ir.2. • 'I�_ �•' -..-.-L. .�,.s .•.L'77 ari '�,,� /1J7 • •yyp_•.f__=t...._..-___---_.—_ -_- -^ C_'...-,.. • g.i;•2J.,• r 11 1 a •'�• M R \`-7i I N1N f �L7-7e7,.::a' ,• _ •.j-T--�'-Y-qT,��- k •.•• =t7• , .Ij I �. .id rl•I_ !41, {,I,f•a N,•'.M1, : `,'t•.z.,\'. t �.R 4 w�c I.I. I •lozl �o lml +`r'�I w:C] ' _� •2P o' i'i ��r` OI�E ■'ze •. ��7o,„ .,__ I/� A� . " r 1„�.1. •i.,,�.p:•,�.<•:h: „n.i.'114.�i4~`x-. '`r'ooD..� •-..,,��VV11..'• .o.:....,[((/•__((99{��,,,v.e��'1y�„��1 ��IT., ..'. �„' 24_ ,j/, • ` I , • , 9,1I � 41 N 1 •,r 10 Y :: -.-- ;Cii. ,,?a -.!.:,kg.q,-4.--;r-c..--7; 4, :. ..',14-# ' .'L/ '"Aa ..,,L ' ur' •R ,E TAT T_ , .k / I .0"-;-••eyr.go ' . ..-- `""14:: :::. O°0 ,• ,,N. ,'� i r• .:• fit:::** ff':a.,J �� d " -I (Proposed) �"'.eu`�`�, c, , •',Gm f • . < 11 1I • I1 7 I cA..I.LL•y',•,°r'•1 :I • ° .r•l • • • NC ' � J4I•• F ''•, , Pr.:....) 1.��j?j-R-c1E..mnY) CO r` 4^ .'• ae•.. •.-1 `Q .. 'n.g),•I" I ,9 0 ' •:yI e ,J. .1 -'* J I •cb SUE v_ to .•it 1', 1 Z3I ko , , :•," n _ ▪ ." . . ''':" ' '' CO , ; • •••••'4,,,,,,:••• ':'.°.•ti.-r-___.:1%.-1Z7-CI' ' .4.7'•!!'t 9 ter :: - 0 q ' + ,to - --:_- • ASNIN0T•O ITECNN C'AL' ,CENTE•11 _je , � mr. `l; - l� . LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE �,Y - Development Regulations 1 0 _ Used For Project Mitigation: Asa'. ,,a proposal,the amendments are not subject to development �J�� - regulations.Future development that may occur In the affected area under Its ♦ ; RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations Including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as The IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,Infrastructure ��'N t� standards,etc.Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other NOTICE OF APPLICATION - applicable regulations. • AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- PropsuedMltigatlenMeaearee: None. SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Rob Jenkins,Project Manager, Economic Development,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00' PM en Febroary B,2000. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record end receive additional notification by mail,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments.will automatically DATE: January 26,2000 become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. LAND USE NUMBER: LUA•99-178,ECF,R CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430.6578 APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900,from approx.the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW,to Residential Multi-Family!Mill(RM-I)from existing Employment Area Commercial,Employment Area Office and Rural Residential;Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential Infll policy LU-69;and Rezone of the 21.78 acres along SR•900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infiil(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE.MITIGATED(DNS-M):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton •' _ ' has determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project Therefore,as . '1 _ 15--- pencilled under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- --- - A ,.v.P�° r-;- M is likely to be Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated Into a single comment at„. ''''o°' ' ';,e-..,.1 .ya Q,d,,, - • • :p g;ti_ l NE period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance •,y_�`„ . ,s. Merlino SR 900 Property d c'99'•• Mitigated DNS-M.A 14-dayappeal period will follow the Issuance of the DNS-M. . I `t.#,3'd'�'.),' •'8 ' •.p • _ kr, �", Comprehensive Plan Map -a: r t PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 �- `'^>'- ��'=7i^- P I'` Fp �r .., '' R• `'" ' , Amendment and Rezone i2 a�.— NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January2l,2000 /�_-.7 ia -...,,','• I':= vNi c QppI,,��n f;.^�";°�' Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and tie`.- °; n I I I p! e _ j recommendation,City Council approval. . -"' �q �•'•I• I '�e1 '� 'da ° - Other Permits which may he required: None. f ._—..•�: / V••O '' °i Ei•1 r F_ p \q i I �t.t�D� �•v,,:. , u:.,.;::u ej.yn.,. i it' I a. 'M R � t�, . ...:'-.�.. •--�.w ,\P P.E � • t_^ %••% ,7[717:11 y - ,�_•b°` '..'in ; • 1,?:in. •'1w ':4-Tug Requested Studies: inane. � � • , Location where application may -"F+"' Z„ a! � V •y ° y"be reviewed: PlanninglBWding/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, ••w '-f�cV._' , 'e 6 , _ .- • -•,.,� •�'.,•r e�•v 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 \`\\�:�• ,'' �,. t• Pie{, A"gQ" "I,e-� .- - • a- rW� PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearingwill be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton .^��Pj - ! 4f 4°'1 p; r-� '''':';e;,. a •`"'o"T°" .24 :,d♦' Al I j, t 1_=; ,_ b.. .•°°,q';'tea ; For specific Chambers.The time and dale of the public hearing has not yet been sal. .s4° 4P-ZLC ,H °. _ p ,a ,4..•:,•,..,,. • For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic '�.,��tIL, ��I' '�• ^�� `� `�� b'O''j"" ' .. Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department a1425-430- '� �`�' r''• djtm j"�a-~� 6578.All parties of record will receive notification. �].�1\L �W��- �-� -� • -� Pr°P'sed) •,•- .. P • t" CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: { `R•"."• Analytical process I ( ( li I I I/; ' cow.. Baj•..:::.` .}.,j',° _ a`�j o 4, Project consistency refers to whether a project Is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in I` spa. ' ,y.�7r ,•�°.�,zl•,a�';:� tiff •°+ lL S CO ...01. I;% d .y. their absence,comprehensive plan policies.RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)Include _^qo Y rr"-°' I ,Y jJ •¢=0•F a statement of the preliminary determination of a projecl's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, •-••..,l • _ ,r, oo 'O `l°•�v'v•"'•"r� Infrastructure,and character of development If one has been made at the lime of notice.Al a minimum,every NOA shall :• . ff �/ A Include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. -• +qr �:r%�^;•� - -- -^ -- ' m /P4 ti' J}� r ..� {,,� r?r,r+' Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this • a� „`j;.�/ r,. ;RIC / �'1 e-----'- G F'� `h � i non•projecI application.This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan \ °. JI\ }ti• I t CO,( ti o r' designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the ' i a u \° \ ®ate./h' -/ .,t ! _I CO` '•�rwj V_ Y7 project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density r��„_,�� •-'i -, residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Inn(RM-I), �-�..ii)i13T-. .y•••••••••••^•••_ +�;',, r _ �trF that Is focused primarily towards mul0•family uses and selected public and civic •1.........1). [34-'" . ••• „„ `l •r I • Environmental Documents that r z Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. ._ WA-99-178 ENV.NOtICE ,• LIIA-99.17e ENV.NOTICE • CERTIFICATION L� / I, 6 S' , hereby certify that / copies of the above document were posted by me in / conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on .S,Q—Goo 1 7 6,0 o /� , • Signed: �.� ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Publi m and a State of Washington residing inc-- , on the f g day ;.- , - s� t IiLy1 �J+GHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC STATE®F V�ASHINGTON �Y� Gv �i-,� c,/..4.25,,z- i COMMISSION EXPIRES JU E 29,2003 r MARILYN KAMCHEFF . MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 = CITE' DF RENTON .. <p1 w IA ; ,•. Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 24,2000 • Mr. David Halinen Halinen Law Offices, P.S. 10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 1900 Bellevue,WA 98004 SUBJECT: Merlino Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezone Project No. LUA-99-178,ECF,R Dear Mr. Halinen: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on February 15, 2000. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at(425)430-6578, if you have any questions. Sincerely, . / /,,V,Z"d ----: / ,... -Z--.....2., R ert E.Jenkins, Al Senior Planner cc: Mr. &'Mrs. Gary Merlino/Owners Mr. &Mrs. Donald Merlino/Owners Quarry Industrial Park, LLC, do Mr. Donald Merlino/Owners • "acceptance . 1055 South��!!�� Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 . [lam]This mane'enntains gn%recycled material 2n%nost consumer ru NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE MITIGATED (DNS-M) DATE: January 26,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-99-178,ECF,R APPLICATION NAME: MERLINO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Comprehensive Plan redesignation of 21.76 acres of land along the south side of SR-900, from approx. the 7600 block to Thomas Avenue SW, to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I).from existing Employment Area Commercial, Employment Area Office and Rural Residential; Comprehensive Plan text amendment to residential infill policy LU-69; and Rezone of the 21.76 acres along SR-900 from a combination of Arterial Commercial (CA),Commercial Office(CO)and Resource Conservation(RC)to Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I). PROJECT LOCATION: SR-900,between the 7600 block and Thomas Avenue SW OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,MITIGATED(DNS-M): As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS(M)process to give notice that a DNS- M is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS-M are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance Mitigated(DNS-M). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS-M. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: December 15,1999 GI 1V NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January21,2000 \, J Permits/Review Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation,City Council approval. Other Permits which may be required: None. Requested Studies: None. Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way;Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: A public hearing will be held before the Renton Planning Commission,in Renton Council Chambers. The time and date of the public hearing has not yet been set. For specific time and place of the public hearing,contact the Economic Development,Neighborhoods,and Strategic Planning Department at 425-430- 6578. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical process Project consistency refers to whether.a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development, infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,comprehensive plan and development regulations. Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. This application is to revise the Comprehensive Plan designations and zoning from a mix of designations and zoning,refer to the project description,that permit a variety of commercial,office and low density residential uses to a designation and zone,Residential Multi-Family Infill(RM-I), that is focused primarily towards multi-family uses and selected public and civic uses. Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental Checklist dated August 25,1997. • LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE Development Regulations - Used Por Project Mitigation: As a legislati:- r:,posal,the amendments are not subject to developr.,._::. • regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its RM-I zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc. Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: None. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Rob Jenkins, Project Manager, Economic Development, Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Department, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055, by 5:00 PM on February 8,2000. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party of record and receive • additional notification by mail, contact the Project Manager. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically ' • become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: ROB JENKINS (425)430-6578 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ._ . ...-.. I C:/ .... 1 1 . .r.l, . I , , n _ :— '°�' � ' r. �' ' �-` b. �dl Merlino SR 900 Property I 77_ �'' F s =d';®`bt � ' `° Comprehensive Plan Map ;,:;- :; , . uWF .n+s :k a+ <'_-^i.., i:. � •\a._11 is • °�`y r C ao id1i+1`1'� �,� I ' � LZ Amendment and Rezone . . .• -'-.l•o • M "" ,, ,�M.!-1Y ;'a a �•� V. . . se -�-�— TRAC75i-w . ..' ob m 1 Ij 0'I'.7,•t''� I 't+/�a- .I ' �'1, IP'i :' `!='!Q.191a1• * ^,� /'�v 'a�n.n • '' v !..:. .I IL. °.,'.I �;r� :-Id d r :I j,.: ,��53 s'� '' .:Sil p, sT EC _ 5 .02NO ' ST • 6 q--,— p 'i S o,pz9 _o .. Ib l r�1 I I 1 1 b ip A ,1`▪"' ., 9-.e.r a. -,7, .. l I I ,I,o n,��,., ° S7t �d ni' ,1, ,,a e� I'sy r'�r . , ..:. .Z`...-•-� peF . `"�' ++ t I`I` t m"1sr. ay......:,,^.. R 0 2 s �Y r= ree��TOS;�: .sue' 4_r �c,Irn= ' i I I .I�ti 16. ] r..4� P o' ?5 i , ,, i iey 1 o aRC/14- iFFKNi� -. . ll t `_' "m • Si 1 •". 2 TES /JS/N Ste-Tom-del.. 'er-•w v�'• 'fl'•a ......,_ 1 •;m»,. • .. :. r � I � �.un rr 9 ,��. • pp� .. t -.., ^r A•'6 r r.,1 bOr• -.p 0•:,d 7q,• p..+, �� .' SI�`,at ./�b e p ,�,I r�ti,, 4+i V� L 410 sr � p > .I .•.' cfJr 'o -...--_.- � 3 t‘‘: .„:" F eligjv�,f,A tJ 4-i h 0 �11 (Proposed) ab ++ 9:;, m+' Fd '- 7.;, i I I CA .bW g Plnom) '� D' O .Ao . .1 .O :Cv ''2' - oi• • Jilik l"I�1 I x ` ~ col •ions) ♦•_.• g-'•.t•j�'s.•... �.',?�,..9', '.w ..� .o.'''"Q (� • • mop 1 (E,O.une i j' • -- C0: Fr iia` Q.?I:r' :'',. b:;,b: e_ Q •-$.oI • r_cTu p ... ) , RC{Edetln9) P_� b'',> ,._ey 4.zfiN .:f//�x'�y7•�)/�•p •:•.0".4 4Y /,,.+'��y SEq J; "` -.I=.:. --C----.._._....._ ,-_ c..nx� \ Oo ©, 17-14. It.� 4 x ji H } ~ yam.-"_�:+, - '�zm w,. -` �». I7 ~�;,-�@�n,•a1 Jr:,i', �y'�7";;'.i�`�,�i /.�` � _ c:, 19 I• RAC t . , - [[ii• r Mj +N. a• o+� \zl ` Lf' CO I I • i CO Z`44 .,'n;�/--. L.,-;-::S ►p- o •'4.,....' . � .•):-c4....mat ^rr ^C-D • .- ,oe r.c••Ic., » o-. _ I — . ArI51 . w .c ` ' ,40100 D _, om.•.. T • '•i ` A ?� _ ,l.P. A S H 117.O TpC\elIT E C H N, +CA Ll4 ., __1,1 , - LUA-99-178 ENV.NOTICE •• • • • ,:,... ..:....:...::..............v..,...,.,,5>}:-0}>s}}.a2'.kEy,:}{:•>.i?S:JS'>?i1}:">ii.1.NSri}i>,.`iv'"t'yy ,:>S'w� }.:Pr>YyiH.. 2` ri:.>;rs y;EE'>:F•:•.:^x>Y }fF::E�.,'.:::;T'.TYYt:,1,`:;ry??ST:t.1>:?:•}`T,{}i:??Y:t yii?2}>a'•:tT:J» • :Y..L;. ..'$ s: :.i. ]..J.•:. .:. 2. .tn:'{f>•.: t+jYE>ii t ik}•%tl:tat.:::::nhfF:.>•.:q••xy,A}ttq••i:�r a['fSfa:ii .y .<,,., . ,.t.,a�>[...>ti itt:..;KiaY.:.:j:tij}Y:.F,. • .to +,:tS>.'.. jft.:..•:•.,t. .�2'::3.S:t [. ..T.,...:.}•::ttyl:.>>}•} 'i:;, .,. <£,.#.}•`f..}.33F#}: r :;: �J..� ;�{: >[:k.�t}2�,`r,:i2f,>:.3}}:;�:32.+.t ,r•E :....:#».4.:.tE.::£:,�kty",y2t.. ,2k...k..:�.fS •.'£:Z` kL€•,.ES 3,.So 23•Y,,,..c£:,. a E:<,•:.•s,:•:.:F:E`''.:.,rttyk;> �., .. ,.f:•I C•L<tf' .t K... . r.....: sttt ' ,:. .�.,•y..}: 3..,�F£ ,.':y •.:?;•ST 3•s:.,;.:#.:.+<Sin„'fF#.ty>:•'. .Yf:F.....g/.'r{tS;>s.,,.t•.:.>f..:•'ostj...,a..v:..t.::>t.4a�•:v::s;5,.i:;�»E�;:s}sE:?i£.`:Yil:#f<tf:.}>^. . y ;ys:. YE.,.., 3. .. :t;�.k,[� �•F>)'.Y:k}}.,,'[f; •:k»�i{.4�kti. fi>j#."[.ksS.n,[t323£ ., j�•> ,;s i/t or,. F� Y '�i::#«�;j:^ •}.�•,$ £.y�F•y.#lh�,,;�{ .yE� ..,Ey3S{; •S ;;ssew£{ a«s#s t.•'.;33s a+'[�t�3t ,? 2ss q>•iDEV yO•PM N't 3$E ,,teesirt» QI?t'` >j' E ..#}}ES'Y:#N>., > >?2<il s.;•tsrgN:f#>f • 33;2•[y#»}izi 1>fi''•3y t(f2: , E:•#.r: is .,.. >:£i 1,v::.v,,a,<it.i.s,F tT,y2;•:;nY's.;:m.s•rA#s.k•>sa>.sy.,. ?s.$t•kY•• 3sy}[' ,E?S t0-0.�:'. ..e .0:: t t0q:`^3+w£'s :4,,.w£,-3 A�'£^f>ts[; ck[.,IF;<2„23,Ytt3'#€. 4>•i£h}�£':•.,iiY?i?i✓:.;[••2e.�.f:k; T.Y£ s`:s: f;:,!`S2kytssiE}.>•'£••>v�:<o?:�g,, �t��<• :`•„1•f: ';�Y�F.[Ss•' ,2,s .ts'f':•.t�:}sE.. ��? .3. �..I {• +frs»L� ! [< 3%`£i:52F rrl 2EE3'IFS:a}>••YT! >..Y:.T 3r•3ry s ;?s:k} i rr2.t3:;f • 4. S03,�r�.51 :ir0 >,y tii£ i ;t sf#�#f.# 'o •`A ti,,...ya .`[1.1,,a# «33•i �{£££�3':id•f�::t{�!is33>3�ak;,y{[,•:et[rEi:£:aj::<ti.t�ii<•,,>u: t•: t�4.:;..EiS• , i:f�f ,s.y.��'�1.�::r«;•��r'ts:;�•R�ti,�„�yYt<[„it�,t:ss.�f.<�;�r',T'•x�:�"•:<r'•+a�3`E'rifF•ty. 4�}}�r.,Aabi:E�;f,t'�2#� *A: :,<' :#F ; { d y ,R #fE 3`Jl 3;£+?'•�'{•:Ek S. ,6#ti .::ESn<,. z<•.:<:,•,2.£1.t,Ad£ ECG1 :;k3} •F£3•, t:; R�••.# ;3;[• 'i. : Y rs;�,`y� i {I\�C�j�`t•••ro,`�;k 2Se^f f it 0 4:0:j'[;3 ;€222`i i ,s E :•�:!J;fi•. ..F;L.F.1• ..T .is � tt:lF �'yi t Y:Y,i.rf L"'1+�''�?•2«}>:' , ;:`t<Y.£Ettf „'t{i>}; „.>�;;kiit••:ait:•..Ett .tt;.;:. :2[t:$,•:.>:R+.•[t:>•:.:':.:A>,�+..r : .>s:; £::•6+:i y' .•£tafS.,;•T,.•;,Sp:•!•.':ti•:;<t>.:•:i£s,t�..G.: •.S:r>:;f•�at>>3t�> `>2k?.,k>:�`>v:» <%:',..c.2: >.,?. ra•:.>"::, ..•.}... »;,22}...£�••:.;at,t•:,•.,} x:•,.jt $ :.µ0 •wAr:.tko•,..r,,..v;,;+ • Eo.,,...�.tt:, }.<':.}}; Y:#,,.t.•.>,, .,to:;;,j:£a:.•:•�:•.t...33T,i t:s:£i,E�:xiaY: iro2E`£}:•.3::,30,:.:[iia::•`:::R•t. >3s;.• '.;.,::.?s?3�..t;.t > ' }>. of. >Fr;3•. J.}�#two J a...;%.E ::.•?y..}•3'S}32:2•:Yi.: ....., s.a>SiykiRa.i}i3+y i>:::.. r,.. r :3't: .£..2 y,.�•> ikk. •t$� �k•i•; :t:t2%k w..tlxs,it.;;.....a• �:£t.:.•>:�y.: •..a.}`„yF!'.tF?!} :i.. ?f•>:t::,>.,,?» #. .st2+�iililF<3f3•f3'£�e..of, • •:::::. ::s?:•s;•:FY;•s..:. <T:'::3::..::.;,.,•.,:.s...:.:>;:...::.,:s•:..:::::.. ...::•. ......... ..:::.:..:,........, ....:>.�,....::;,,y:.C.tF}.F.•: 'i.r}.+:�.,. .....#t;t.;i}};:.. • • PROJECT NAME: Merlin SR900 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone • APPLICATION NO: LU/ - 11• t1 g ELto • The following is•e list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ' NUMBER • • • • SEE ATTACHED. • • • • • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • CITY OF RENTON •• DEC 15 1999 • • RECEIVED • • • • • • • • (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) .' . • . . . * '. • • • (Continued) • • • NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ' • NUMBER • • • • • • • • • • • • . • Applicant Certification 4 David L. Halinen • • , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners•and their addresses were obtained from: - ❑' City of Renton Technical Services Records `0. )t S44111, ❑ Title Company Records `.`,..coo ti'otie.t,, ,: • ❑ King County Assessors Records ..,�•`� 0°' ' NOTA Ry = ~ • ~Date /Z�// 9� —Signed �c:. :.. ,. e, „Li0� (Applic nt) ii,.....P,3.U..2.1..0606,..:,...t.t.i>.:7.0..: NOTARY ,,Op wp►S 44 ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State,, tate oVVW !hington, r residing at N on the 'day of 4)E k&-72....._ , t 9 W. Signed '� • (Notary Public) =m=m, ary • •'r< s3s:•i Oov .E'i'i,:: :t•• :}•:is :.�: ;: .,. .:t ti:j?:: 'Y:•::::;:}'.}•::::.>.kt :::k�}:k;k;::Ik;:>,tk;;:';•}:}:$$$: $i1$•: �i$$$ )'O}?:.}•: ;�f....,.......v. ..)i:.}?::}::'.:}::} ::J.::•t;>:::::$$?$tit:;:::::::•:;:k?'i':k;);k :::k;:v:t,k}:$fi... •: ::::.. ,..:. .u:.:v'::4:;.:i$: iiT ::!{)::rvvJ:});:•$%;(v: ...<..;;k:,,:tat......„:•:•;t4.:{+,y;r•.:r.::••}J:!::}:h:•i.J•YU;iJ';•:v.:a.:n;•'ai::k�;•:.::v.r:)$:�$S}::y:}•..t......ni:•:.,a,v.a,•.:v.,...,.,v•.{::?•:.:. •...:,......... {{,•;{${,...+....aa •;::k:$?;•:•}:!;t;;::>;.!};.,:.?}t;::.:.}:t?}},..$Y,..}{.:{.5.}:;::<!:i.i {:'{.}}:.:.:t«::.. A K}t\l:•O : ...):.,:..,,....... •..:. t,•..,. ,:.:.: ::..: ........)>}:::r.....a,...,,..a:,!.::::..a:.:::r,:!:!aa{...*,.....:.... ...r. ::::::..:...::::.:.......a.....,.rJ,.........r..:.}:;:>:.;.., ... ....:..:..:)....,}....r......... .:)}}:••::;w:.v..v a.., :::vM1.:; }..:{'4):•}:^:. ..v:.:a,a.a......:.i:..:..,t?•.v.,;•.v.:} • ; :?•iti•?5;::•:`•:}}`y{:•;':•}::r`;;+.•}:;•:.i}:t•:iKt:{::::::::::::.:::::�.)}:{{.}•;:S•:itw::. .......r.......r..:.r.... . .. .. ). nt{;x,,,...v:,•. ' ...•...:.::::.:::;•::.., i*:::......:.::x•:*!:..........:.......:: .::••::}.::)::: :::5:*:•• .•:::: ...... .......: :...:. :.:::..;r.:.5•:::?5r.•r.:});:x nI..x::.v: ..:...,v.,::•'.a::..$. . `r.. ..v•.:.::Y:}r v:::v.,:::::•t+.:•{:•:•.v,::•.w.:v v:;; ...:.• :):•:::•�{:$;;i;;t.;{.}!.{{, :.}v{:.':{{{{:::: }'{:$:v:i::• • • t>:;.::::.,.. .Y.... ..:.. ::th.at.:not(ee�:.<.to$;cd aceci � •r.cr' � : . .:5::z;;<::� ; :>::. It Lam��. } steel;:.. :>: `,o r ............. ,:•.v::x a•::x:x:::::.ta•.;t•}:::........... ....F.n...........?:?. .,,:....:. •.t,::v::v.......1•J)`:.......... .,........�.: .t.:;:•:r•::f.:• :{:4 v.{G:S{;{.};:.}};:�•:J::•:•i}:•$}t}•:•:;n5::)•{{•.v::..:v: �•}:;.::}:•.:•}}}:::............... .. :..........:a..................,..... .. ....:....n..,......,......:..,.................. v.::;v::::v r..::::..........:..:...:::v;.:+'••::}:::::::,.. .; : 'v• ?. ;; ' v ......:..........+........r..:.::5..r.$:::..,n........x:?!.:v:.•, .,; .. : ,$}, ..} 'fri�" `:tikt S• ti;k;k � :?� .. ...;.:,.,•..} � tik :>;;:•::}:•::: .,k:;:#:$•:Wiz: :.t.. { •.iv `,�yy .tGt.• n• O 1IEi' -;i> kki`; {�$r _ :tt' t$�S Try�� `:•r'+• �::•)" :•$;;k: :�`5?: .rt d e :a�d5•.svvo. • :tb:sfQre:,me :•a,•.Na P >..,:.,•::?...:::.:.:::. ....:..:...;•,,,,::::•::.�.:,:"::,..:,::.::.t:•:.: ...... ...... ... : . ... ... .a u ti.l.c.:..t n.�•r.I cI')for ra ri'tt $? :fit Yy i, t•`•2 q�,.};t:. n e rJa; ,�;`�'� i / $Sk ilkk ..t. is$?'�•',� ,.{:;, .a4 i't`...) $yY:: :'tit .t}.. 1rl}}•}:}?,;; S• e. .)r �:>:r..a. t - MA• LYN'' MC ;.. ,:..... ...,at.a...+,ti:•.i•: •:.i:: : »<<>. „.... c` ie,,t'°°c MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:REV)r94 r 132304-9009-06 132304-9012-01-000 132304-9020-01 BNSF RAILROAD CITY OF RENTON NORTHRN SANTA FE BURLINGTON 1700 E GOLF RD 200 MILL AVE S 1700 E GOLF RD 400 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173-5804 RENTON WA 98055-2132 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173-5820 214370-0775-02 214370-0776-01 214370-0787-08 PATRICK D.TEXEIRA W.D.ELLIOTT LORINE STRUZNIK 1013 SW 3RD PL 312 POWELL AVE SW 318 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055-2236 RENTON WA 98055-2253 RENTON WA 98055-2253 214370-0800-01 214370-0810-09 214370-0815-04 GLORIA C.MUCDUFFIE CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK MATHEW B.TABAK JUDIT NOONAN 1048 SW 4TH PL 5700 WILSHIRE BLVD 1024 SW 4TH PL RENTON WA 98055-2278 LOS ANGELES CA 90036-3659 RENTON WA 98055-2278 214370-0825-02 214370-0830-05 214370-0840-03 LIEN THANH NGUYEN W.E.KAPPENMAN WARREN E.ELISEUSON 1111 S 4TH ST 1004 SW 4TH PL 924 SW 4TH PL RENTON WA 98055-3077 RENTON WA 98055-2278 RENTON WA 98055-2226 214370-0845-08 214370-0855-05 214370-0860-08 GERALD L.ENG RICHARD A.ELVALENE HAYWARD J.J.THARP 920 SW 4TH PL 916 SW 4TH PL 359 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055-2226 RENTON WA 98055-2226 RENTON WA 98055-2214 214370-1865-01 298880-0015-08 298880-0100-04 SHARON S.ELLINGSON O'NEIL R.SUCKIE KIM STAATS 611 DALEY ST APT 1 13518 80TH AVE S 9766 ARROWSMITH AVE#S EDMONDS WA 98020-3091 SEATTLE WA 98178-5103 SEATTLE WA 98118-5903 298880-0105-09 298880-0110-02 298880-0115-07 KELLY R.CROUSE EUNICE I.HILL JAMES HARVEY MCDOWELL 7621 S 135TH ST 7609 S 135TH ST 7605 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 298880-0121-09 298880-0125-05 298880-0130-08 EVELYN WILLIAMS ALBERTO F.GALAROSA JAMES O.WOOD 7601 1/2 S 135TH ST 7545 S 135TH ST 7525 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 SEATTLE WA 98178-5155 SEATTLE WA 98178-5155 298880-0142-04 298880-0144-02 298880-0145-01 ARTURO DEVERA MICHAEL S.YOUSOOFIAN TOM V.BUI 4615 S FRONTENAC ST 13503 80TH AVE S 11841 55TH AV S SEATTLE WA 98118-3627 SEATTLE WA 98178-5104 SEATTLE WA 98178-2850 298880-0150-03 298880-0155-08 298880-0156-07 JAMES B.THOMSON MANUEL C.NAVARRO ANTHONY DONA 7837 S 135TH ST 8024 S 130TH ST 9903 64TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178-5151 SEATTLE WA 98178-4942 SEATTLE WA 98118-5836 • • i 298880-0160-01 298880-0165-06 298880-0170-09 W.C.BROCKWAY BRYCE E.BROCKWAY STEVEN D.HILLESTAD 7805 S 135TH ST 2320 HUGHES AVE SW 7655'S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178-5151 SEATTLE WA 98116-1836 SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 298880-0177-02 377920-0005-04 392660-0010-00 TERRY G.TAYLOR ANMARCO BONIFACIO C.LIMON 7645 S 135TH ST 9125 10TH AV S 9030 SEWARD PARK AVE S APT 50 SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 SEATTLE WA 98108-4612 OSEATTLE WA 98118-6072 392660-0020-08 392660-0030-06 392660-0040-04 BING KWAN WONG ROBERT R.&JANET GRANT JOSE C.JUBANE 307 OAKESDALE AVE SW 270 NACHES AVE SW 276 NACHES AVE SW RENTON WA 98055-2294 RENTON WA 98055-2295 RENTON WA 98055-2295 392660-0050-01 392660-0060-09 747190-0005-01 PHI LE LINA C.LEE JAMES BALOGH 325 OAKESDALE AVE SW 16580 SE 49TH ST PO BOX 3781 RENTON WA 98055-2294 BELLEVUE WA 98006-5898 SEATTLE WA 98124-3781 747190-0015-09 747190-0020-02 747190-0030-00 GRACY CLAYTON MARKS.GNAGY WILLIAM B.BAUMGARDNER 108 SPRING PL 321 POWELL AVE SW 313 POWELL AVE SW ENUMCLAW WA 98022-8439 RENTON WA 98055-2254 RENTON WA 98055-2254 747190-0035-05 747190-0043-05 747190-0045-03 MARY A.BODENHAMER CONSTRUCTION TEAM STEPHEN E.EASTMAN 309 POWELL AVE SW 3431 96TH AVE NE 317 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055-2254 BELLEVUE WA 98004-1706 RENTON WA 98055-2254 801360-0065-07 801360-0070-00 811990-0010-00 DOUGLAS L.PROCTOR LLOYD D.KLINE PETER C.K.ONEIL 7273 S 135TH ST 7285 S 135TH ST 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-1 SEATTLE WA 98178-5157 SEATTLE WA 98178-5157 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0020-08 811990-0030-06 811990-0040-04 THAI HO MITSU M.HOUSTON SHANNON N.BROOKS 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-2 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-3 833 SW SUNSET BLV RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0050-01 811990-0060-09 811990-0070-07 ELIZABETH R.RACOOSIN WILLIE J.GRANT BRENDA L.KURZ 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-5 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-6 833 SW SUNSET BLV B RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0080-05 811990-0090-03 811990-0100-01 VIRGIL L.GOODWIN ALAN J.KYCEK MICHAEL A.COOK 833 SW SUNSET BLV B-8 14311 124TH AVE NE 113 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT B10 RENTON WA 98055-2296 KIRKLAND WA 98034-1459 RENTON WA 98055-2285 811990-0110-09 811990-0120-07 811990-0130-05 JEANNE S.RICKEY RHONDA L.MCLEOD CHARLENE A.PATTON 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT B11 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-12 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-13 RENTON WA 98055-2285 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0140-03 811990-0150-00 811990-0160-08 ALMA S.SILVEO MELISSA A.REESE JEFFREY D.SLADE 833 SW SUNSET BLV 14-C 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-15 833 SW SUNSET BLV C RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0180-04 811990-0190-02 811990-0200-00 CURRY D.JONES RICHARD C.FISHER MARK C.FUNCK 833 SW SUNSET BLV D-18 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT D19 833 SW SUNSET BLV D-20 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2286 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0210-08 811990-0220-06 811990-0230-04 PATRICIA L.REUTER CAROLE A.CHICHESTER THOMAS FOWLER 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT D21 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#E 23 RENTON WA 98055-2286 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98056-2286 811990-0240-02 811990-0250-09 811990-0260-07 VICTORIA LYNN CARPENTER MARILYN KHALIFE HISAKO LEATHERMAN 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT E24 833 SW SUNSET BLV E-25 833 SW SUNSET BLV E-26 RENTON WA 98055-2287 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0270-05 811990-0280-03 811990-0290-01 DONALD TONG P. CARNAHAN MARIAN URH 833 SW SUNSET BLV 27 1700 BELLEVUE AVE APT 505 833 SW SUNSET BLV F-29 RENTON WA 98055-2296 SEATTLE WA 98122-2079 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0300-09 811990-0310-07 811990-0320-05 LYNDA L.HEIMBIGNER LOIS JEAN ROBERTS JOSEPH A.POMERLEAU 833 SW SUNSET BLV F-30 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT F31 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT F32 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2288 RENTON WA 98055-2288 811990-0340-01 811990-0350-08 811990-0360-06 LEONARD BISCONER MICHAEL L.BOWSER SIMON MAUNG SHWE KHIN 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G34 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G35 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G36 RENTON WA 98055-2288 RENTON WA 98055-2288 RENTON WA 98055-2289 811990-0370-04 811990-0380-02 811990-0390-00 JEFFREY J.HOFFMANN BARBARA J.HANSEN GEORGE L.BARNES 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G37 833 SWSUNSET BLV H-38 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-39 RENTON WA 98055-2289 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0400-08 811990-0410-06 811990-0420-04 LEE I.WOODSIDE WANDA L.LOWE ROBERT HAYES 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-40 233 SW SUNSET BLV 41 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#I-42 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2318 RENTON WA 98055-2296 w I I-• 811990-0430-02 811990-0440-00 811990-0450-07 WEI L.&YUCHAN C.YU MICHAEL L.DEGROSS JEFF A.HOLM 833 SW SUNSET LVD#I43 833 SW SUNSET BLV I-44 15221 SE FAIRWOOD BLV RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98058-8645 811990-0460-05 811990-0470-03 811990-0480-01 DINO A.COLE KELVIN JONES JAMES H.KUBLI 833 SW SUNSET BLV 46 5227 56TH AVE S 833 SW SUNSET BLV J RENTON WA 98055-2296 SEATTLE WA 98118-2512 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0490-09 811990-0500-07 811990-0510-05 L. SAKO_JULIE WEI CHEN RAYMOND WING LEW 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT J49 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#J50 833 SW SUNSET BLV 3J-51 RENTON WA 98055-2291 RENTON WA 98055-2291 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0520-03 811990-0530-01 811990-0540-09 PATRICIA BARAJAS JACQUELINE R.ROEMISH DAVID R.ZANATTA KLINE KLINE 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#K52 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT K53 3806 13TH AVE W RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2291 SEATTLE WA 98119-1312 811990-0550-06 811990-0560-04 811990-0570-02 LISA N.PHUNG EVELYN JOYCE REINGOLD EMMANUEL S.GO 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT L55 833 SW SUNSET BLV L-56 833 SW SUNSET BLV L-57 RENTON WA 98055-2292 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 811990-0590-08 811990-0600-06 MEAGAN L.HENDERSON JOHN A.MILLER 833 SW SUNSET BLV 59 833 SW SUNSET BLV M-60 RENTON WA 98055-2296 RENTON WA 98055-2296 .../ -- ...i.-- 7.MiiiiIiiPeNNiMaitiM:MiliEil:MOMMEgiti.:4.. giagNiiiniiiiiiiiiiintiagiiMiai. AggggggiI ON;i41.CE Zikb5A MENVEU:046.Miniiigniiiiiiiiiiilail.614.. 04igiiiiiiWYMMiggiigggial .. . •••••••-............. .. 3. 132304-9009-06 BNSF RAILROAD 1110 MONSTER RD SW RENTON 98055 1700 E GOLF RD SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 2 132304-9012-01-000 CITY OF RENTON 7801 S 140TH ST _200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 3 132304-9012-01-001 _CITY OF RENTON 7801 S 140TH ST 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 4 132304-9012-01-002 CITY OF RENTON 7801 S 140TH ST 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 5 132304-9020-01 BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE 1700 E GOLF RD 400 SCHAUMBURG IL 60173 6 132304-9024-07-000 CITY OF RENTON 14250 68TH AVE S 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 _ 7 132304-9024-07-001 CITY OF RENTON 14250 68TH AVE S 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 8 132304-9024-07-002 CITY OF RENTON 14250 68TH AVE S 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 9 132304-9088-00 CITY OF RENTON 500 NACHES AVE SW RENTON 98055 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 10 214370-0775-02 TEXEIRA PATRICK D 1013 SW 3RD PL RENTON 98055 1013 SW 3RD PL RENTON WA 98055 ii. 214370-0776-01 ELLIOTT W D 312 POWELL AVE SW RENTON 98055 312 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 12 214370-0787-08 STRUZNIK LORINE 318 POWELL AVE SW RENTON 98055 318 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 425/226-6756 13 214370-0800-01 MUCDUFFIE GLORIA C 1048 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 1048 SW 4TH PL RENTON WA 98055 ' 14 214370-0810-09 CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK 1036 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 5700 WILSHIRE BLVD LOS ANGELES CA 90036 15 214370-0815-04 NOONAN MATHEW B TABAK JUDIT 1024 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 1024 SW 4TH PL RENTON WA 98055 16 214370-0825-02 NGUYEN LIEN THANH/HW 1012 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 1111 S 4TH ST RENTON WA 98055 17 214370-0830-05 KAPPENMAN WE 1004 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 1004 SW 4TH PL RENTON WA 98055 le 214370-0840-03 ELISEUSON WARREN E 924 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 924 SW 4TH PL RENTON WA 98055 425/226-5849 19 214370-0845-08 ENG GERALD L 920 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 920 SW 4TH PL RENTON WA 98055 20 214370-0855-05 HAYWARD RICHARD A ELVALENE 916 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 916 SW 4TH PL RENTON WA 98055 425/226-6385 22. 214370-0860-08 THARP J J 359 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON 98055 359 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 22 214370-0861-07 THARP JOHN J 912 SW 4TH PL RENTON 98055 359 THOMAS AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 23 214370-1860-06 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 24 214370-1865-01 ELLINGSON SHARON S 611 DALEY ST APT 1 EDMONDS WA 98020 25 298880-0015-08 SUCKIE O'NEIL R 13518 80TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 13518 80TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 26 298880-0100-04 STAATS KIM/SW 7635 135TH AVE SE RENTON 98059 9766 ARROWSMITH AVE#S SEATTLE WA 98118 27 298880-0105-09 CROUSE KELLY R/UM 7621 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7621 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 28 298880-0110-02 HILL EUNICE I 7609 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7609 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 425/255-6169 29 298880-0115-07 MCDOWELL JAMES HARVEY 7605 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7605 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 425/277-5353 30 298880-0121-09 WILLIAMS EVELYN 7601-1/2 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7601 1/2 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 31 298880-0125-05 GALAROSA ALBERTO F 7545 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7545 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 32 298880-0130-08 WOOD JAMES 0 7525 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 33 298880-0136-02 WOOD JAMES 7525 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 34 298880-0142-04 DEVERA ARTURO 4615 S FRONTENAC ST SEATTLE WA 98118 _ . 35 298880-0143-03 DEVERA ARTURO 4615 S FRONTENAC ST SEATTLE WA 98118 36 298880-0144-02 YOUSOOFIAN MICHAEL S 13503 80TH AVE S SEATTLE 98178 13503 80TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98178 425/235-4819 37 298880-0145-01 BUI TOM V 11841 55TH AV S SEATTLE WA 98178 38 298880-0150-03 THOMSON JAMES B 7837 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7837 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 39 298880-0155-08 NAVARRO MANUEL C 8024 S 130TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 40 298880-0156-07 DONA ANTHONY 9903 64TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 43. 298880-0160-01 BROCKWAY W C 7805 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7805 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 425/255-5574 42 298880-0165-06 BROCKWAY BRYCE E 7669 135TH AVE SE RENTON 98059 2320 HUGHES AVE SW SEATTLE WA 98116 43 298880-0170-09 HILLESTAD STEVEN D 7655 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7655 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 44 298880-0177-02 TAYLOR TERRY G 7645 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7645 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 45 377920-0005-04 ANMARCO 7400 S 140TH ST 912510TH AVS SEATTLE WA 98108 46 377920-0117-09 CITY OF RENTON 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 47 392660-0010-00 LIMON BONIFACIO C JR 301 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON 98055 9030 SEWARD PARK AVE S APT 5 OSEATTLE WA 98118 48 392660-0020-08 WONG BING KWAN 307 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON 98055 307 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 48 392660-0030-06 GRANT ROBERT R&JANET 270 NACHES AVE SW RENTON 98055 270 NACHES AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 ©1996 WirT2Data 2000 Page: 1 of 3 • gfkkommi mgmEniNoymermmimiNgim:.nwpolommoowimi;wiAwarg goo*,:;mginiMail A-00mmvimim immg*004100014gotillmokom 50 392660-0040-04 JUBANE JOSE C 721 151ST ST SW 276 NACHES AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 51 392660-0050-01 LE PHI 325 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON 98055 325 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 52 392660-0060-09 LEE LINA C 331 OAKESDALE AVE SW RENTON 98055 16580 SE 49TH ST BELLEVUE WA 98006 53 747190-0005-01 BALOGH JAMES/SM 1124 SW SUNSET BLVD RENTON 98055 PO BOX 3781 SEATTLE WA 98124 54 747190-0015-09 CLAYTON GRACY 108 SPRING PL ENUMCLAW WA 98022 55 747190-0020-02 GNAGY MARK S 321 POWELL AVE SW RENTON 98055 321 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 425/235-8123 56 747190-0030-00 BAUMGARDNER WILLIAM B 313 POWELL AVE SW RENTON 98055 313 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 57 747190-0035-05 BODENHAMER MARY A 309 POWELL AVE SW RENTON 98055 309 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 425/255-8748 58 747190-0043-05 TEAM CONSTRUCTION 1105 SW 3RD ST SW 3431 96TH AVE NE BELLEVUE WA 98004 59 747190-0045-03 EASTMAN STEPHEN E 317 POWELL AVE SW RENTON 98055 317 POWELL AVE SW RENTON WA 98055 60 801360-0065-07 PROCTOR DOUGLAS L 7273 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7273 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 61 801360-0070-00 KLINE LLOYD D 7285 S 135TH ST SEATTLE 98178 7285 S 135TH ST SEATTLE WA 98178 425/255-8105 62 811990-0010-00 ONEIL PETER C K 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 1 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-1 RENTON WA 98055 425/271-7155 63 811990-0020-08 HO THAI 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 2 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-2 RENTON WA 98055 `,. 64 811990-0030-06 HOUSTON MITSU M 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 3 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-3 RENTON WA 98055 65 811990-0040-04 BROOKS SHANNON N 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 4 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV RENTON WA 98055 66 811990-0050-01 RACOOSIN ELIZABETH R 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 5 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-5 RENTON WA 98055 425/277-8325 67 811990-0060-09 GRANT WILLIE J 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 6 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-6 RENTON WA 98055 425/226-4851 68 811990-0070-07 KURZ BRENDA L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 7 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV B RENTON WA 98055 69 811990-0080-05 GOODWIN VIRGIL L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 8 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV B-8 RENTON WA 98055 70 811990-0090-03 KYCEK ALAN J 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 9 RENTON 98055 14311 124TH AVE NE 113 KIRKLAND WA 98034 - 73. 811990-0100-01 COOK MICHAEL A 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 10 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT B10 RENTON WA 98055 72 811990-0110-09 RICKEY JEANNE S 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 11 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT B11 RENTON WA 98055 73 811990-0120-07 MCLEOD RHONDA L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 12 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-12 RENTON WA 98055 74 811990-0130-05 PATTON CHARLENE A 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 13 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-13 RENTON WA 98055 75 811990-0140-03 SILVEO ALMA S 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 14 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV 14-C RENTON WA 98055 •76 811990-0150-00 REESE MELISSA A 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 15 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-15 RENTON WA 98055 77 811990-0160-08 SLADE JEFFREY D 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 16 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV C RENTON WA 98055 78 811990-0170-06 BURCHETT GEORFFREY 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 17 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV RENTON WA 98055 79 811990-0180-04 JONES CURRY D 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 18 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV D-18 RENTON WA 98055 80 811990-0190-02 FISHER RICHARD C 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 19 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT D19 RENTON WA 98055 -_ ei. 811990-0200-00 FUNCK MARK C 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 20 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV D-20 RENTON WA 98055 82 811990-0210-08 REUTER PATRICIA L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 21 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT D21 RENTON WA 98055 . ,_. 83 811990-0220-06 CHICHESTER CAROLE A 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 22 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLVD RENTON WA 98055 84 811990-0230-04 FOWLER THOMAS 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 23 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#E 23 RENTON WA 98056 85 811990-0240-02 CARPENTER VICTORIA LYNN 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 24 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT E24 RENTON WA 98055 ea 811990-0250-09 KHALIFE MARILYN 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 25 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV E-25 RENTON WA 98055 425/277-8781 87 811990-0260-07 LEATHERMAN HISAKO 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 26 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV E-26 RENTON WA 98055 88 811990-0270-05 TONG DONALD 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 27 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV 27 RENTON WA 98055 425/226-6504 89 811990-0280-03 CARNAHAN P 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 28 RENTON 98055 1700 BELLEVUE AVE APT 505 SEATTLE WA 98122 90 811990-0290-01 URH MARIAN -833 SW SUNSET BLVD 29 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV F-29 RENTON WA 98055 91 811990-0300-09 HEIMBIGNER LYNDA L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 30 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV F-30 RENTON WA 98055 92 811990-0310-07 ROBERTS LOIS JEAN 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 31 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT F31 RENTON WA 98055 93 811990-0320-05 POMERLEAU JOSEPH A 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 32 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT F32 RENTON WA 98055 94 811990-0330-03 BRECKENRIDGE SCOTT 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 33 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV RENTON WA 98055 _ 95 811990-0340-01 BISCONER LEONARD 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 34 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G34 RENTON WA 98055 96 811990-0350-08 BOWSER MICHAEL L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 35 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G35 RENTON WA 98055 97 811990-0360-06 KHIN SIMON MAUNG SHWE 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 36 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G36 RENTON WA 98055 98 811990-0370-04 HOFFMANN JEFFREY J 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 37 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G37 RENTON WA 98055 D 1996 INIrs2Data 2000 Page:2 of 3 41 • :Timigi:ini gi:521::i:Iiiimol:••••••:•:•:•INSMIONESSN:i:::iiiw:•••••:•:•:•:6:i:ier::::INESENNEEniget:•:•:•::51pot:i:i*i•:•:**:•:•00:16:9:11 i!:::iiiiii:::::::::::*•4r.H:::10:iiii:Iiiil:740,4•:•:•:00-::::1:$iaiiiiiiiinagm.4,•:•:116::•••04•••••••••im,::::12:118ii iniiim::•Iiiiii:0:•10:•••:•:•.ts:•:•:•:‘:.i*61:010,:•:•:•:•1:•1:•:y4. . i:ling.A. :01.1eiii..jiiisii 99 811990-0380-02 HANSEN BARBARA J - 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 38 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-38 RENTON WA 98055 100 811990-0390-00 BARNES GEORGE L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 39 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-39 RENTON WA 98055 425/277-8031 101 811990-0400-08 WOODSIDE LEE I 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 40 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-40 RENTON WA 98055 io2 811990-0410-06 LOWE WANDA L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 41 RENTON 98055 233 SW SUNSET BLV 41 RENTON WA 98055 103 811990-0420-04 HAYES ROBERT 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 42 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#I-42 RENTON WA 98055 io4 811990-0430-02 YU WEI L&YUCHAN C 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 43 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET LVD#143 RENTON WA 98055 105 811990-0440-00 DEGROSS MICHAEL L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 44 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLVI-44 RENTON WA 98055 106 811990-0450-07 HOLM JEFF A 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 45 RENTON 98055 15221 SE FAIRWOOD BLV RENTON WA 98058 107 811990-0460-05 COLE DINO A 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 46 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV 46 RENTON WA 98055 108 811990-0470-03 JONES KELVIN 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 47 RENTON 98055 5227 56TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98118 109 811990-0480-01 KUBLI JAMES H 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 48 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV J RENTON WA 98055 110 811990-0490-09 SAKO_JULIE L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 49 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT J49 RENTON WA 98055 in 811990-0500-07 CHEN WEI/EA 833 SW SUNSET BV# J-50 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#J50 RENTON WA 98055 _ 112 811990-0510-05 LEW RAYMOND WING 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 51 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV 3J-51 RENTON WA 98055 _.:113 811990-0520-03 BARAJAS PATRICIA 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 52 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#K52 RENTON WA 98055 114 811990-0530-01 ROEMISH JACQUELINE R 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 53 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT K53 RENTON WA 98055 115 811990-0540-09 KLINE DAVID R ZANATTA KLINE 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 54 RENTON 98055 3806 13TH AVE W SEATTLE WA 98119 us 811990-0550-06 PHUNG LISA N 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 55 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT L55 RENTON WA 98055 117 811990-0560-04 REINGOLD EVELYN JOYCE 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 56 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV L-56 RENTON WA 98055 118 811990-0570-02 GO EMMANUEL S 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 57 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV L-57 RENTON WA 98055 119 811990-0580-00 WHITE MOZELLA R 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 58 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV RENTON WA 98055 120 811990-0590-08 HENDERSON MEAGAN L 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 59 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV 59 RENTON WA 98055 121 811990-0600-06 MILLER JOHN A JR 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 60 RENTON 98055 833 SW SUNSET BLV M-60 RENTON WA 98055 425/277-3768 ( ' • ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:3 of 3 1) Situs: 1110 MONSTER RD SW, RENTON WA 98055-2961 C002 Lot Area: 66,023 APN: 132304-9009-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/19/1992 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $1,461,600 Zoning: P1 Use: EASEMENT Doc#: Cnty Use: 953 Owners: BNSF RAILROAD Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 1700 E GOLF RD; SCHAUMBURG IL 60173-5804 C040 Phone: 2) Situs: 7801 S 140TH ST, WA Lot Area: 131,091 APN: 132304-9012-01-000 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/30/1994 06/16/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,700,000 Zoning: CO Use: COMMERCIAL ACREAGE Doc#: 9406302135 Cnty Use: 923 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 3) Situs: 7801 S 140TH ST, WA Lot Area: 131,091 APN: 132304-9012-01-001 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/30/1994 06/16/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,700,000 Zoning: CO Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 9406302135 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 4) Situs: 7801 S 140TH ST, WA Lot Area: 131,091 APN: 132304-9012-01-002 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/30/1994 06/16/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,700,000 Zoning: CO Use: COMMERCIAL ACREAGE Doc#: 9406302135 Cnty Use: 923 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 5) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 621,166 APN: 132304-9020-01 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: CO Use: RESIDENTIAL(NEC) Doc#: Cnty Use: 001 Owners: BURLINGTON NORTHRN SANTA FE Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 1700 E GOLF RD 400; SCHAUMBURG IL 60173-5820 C040 Phone: 6) Situs: 14250 68TH AVE S, WA Lot Area: 223,314 APN: 132304-9024-07-000 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/20/1992 05/19/1992 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,501,228 Zoning: RC Use: COMMERCIAL ACREAGE Doc#: 9205201349 Cnty Use: 923 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 7) Situs: 14250 68TH AVE S, WA Lot Area: 223,314 APN: 132304-9024-07-001 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/20/1992 05/19/1992 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,501,228 Zoning: RC Use:. RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 9205201349 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 1 of 18 8) Situs: 14250 68TH AVE S, WA Lot Area: 223,314 APN: 132304-9024-07-002 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/20/1992 05/19/1992 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,501,228 Zoning: RC Use: COMMERCIAL ACREAGE Doc#: 9205201349 Cnty Use: 923 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 9) Situs: 500 NACHES AVE SW,RENTON WA 98055-2293 C002 Lot Area: 233,901 APN: 132304-9088-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/30/1994 06/16/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,700,000 Zoning: CO Use: COMMERCIAL ACREAGE Doc#: 9406302135 Cnty Use: 923 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 10) Situs: 1013 SW 3RD PL, RENTON WA 98055-2236 C003 Lot Area: 19,600 APN: 214370-0775-02 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,990 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: TEXEIRA PATRICK D Rooms: 8 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1920 Mail: 1013 SW 3RD PL; RENTON WA 98055-2236 C003 Phone: 11) Situs: 312 POWELL AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2253 C003 Lot Area: 6,000 APN: 214370-0776-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/11/1977 07/11/1977 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,430 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $37,500 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 7707110168 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: ELLIOTT W D Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J3 WILLIAMS B D Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1912 Mail: 312 POWELL AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2253 C003 Phone: 12) Situs: 318 POWELL AVE SW,RENTON WA 98055-2253 C003 Lot Area: 6,300 APN: 214370-0787-08 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,380 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: STRUZNIK LORINE Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1977 Mail: 318 POWELL AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2253 C003 Phone: 425/226-6756 13) Situs: 1048 SW 4TH PL, RENTON WA 98055-2278 C003 Lot Area: 14,720 APN: 214370-0800-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/31/1986 12/31/1986 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,300 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $65,000 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 8612313746 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: MUCDUFFIE GLORIA C Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1943 Mail: 1048 SW 4TH PL; RENTON WA 98055-2278 C003 Phone: 14) Situs: 1036 SW 4TH PL, RENTON WA 98055-2278 C003 Lot Area: 12,990 APN: 214370-0810-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/01/1999 09/30/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,860 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $154,370 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: CALIFORNIA FEDERAL BANK Rooms: 7 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1949 Mail: 5700 WILSHIRE BLVD; LOS ANGELES CA 90036-3659 C056 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:2 of 18 • 15) Situs: 1024 SW 4TH PL, RENTON WA 98055-2278 C003 Lot Area: 13,800 APN: 214370-0815-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/08/1991 04/25/1991 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,780 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 9105080897 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: NOONAN MATHEW B TABAK JUDIT Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1941 Mail: 1024 SW 4TH PL; RENTON WA 98055-2278 C003 Phone: 16) Situs: 1012 SW 4TH PL, RENTON WA 98055-2278 C003 Lot Area: 14,760 APN: 214370-0825-02 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/19/1989 05/19/1989 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,480 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $43,000 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 8905190008 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: NGUYEN LIEN THANH/HW Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 OANH Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1943 Mail: 1111 S 4TH ST; RENTON WA 98055-3077 C036 Phone: 17) Situs: 1004 SW 4TH PL, RENTON WA 98055-2278 C003 Lot Area: 19,680 APN: 214370-0830-05 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 2,100 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: KAPPENMAN W E Rooms: 7 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1914 Mail: _ 1004 SW 4TH PL; RENTON WA 98055-2278 C003 Phone: 18) Situs: 924 SW 4TH PL, RENTON WA 98055-2226 C003 Lot Area: 14,760 APN: 214370-0840-03 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,210 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: ELISEUSON WARREN E Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1941 Mail: 924 SW 4TH PL; RENTON WA 98055-2226 C003 Phone: 425/226-5849 19) Situs: 920 SW 4TH PL,RENTON WA 98055-2226 C003 Lot Area: 12,300 APN: 214370-0845-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/30/1985 09/30/1985 Bldg/Liv Area: 690 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $47,950 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 8509301494 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: ENG GERALD L Rooms: 4 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 KATHERINE B Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1941 Mail: 920 SW 4TH PL; RENTON WA 98055-2226 C003 Phone: 20) Situs: 916 SW 4TH PL,RENTON WA 98055-2226 C003 Lot Area: 14,760 APN: 214370-0855-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 08/06/1986 08/06/1986 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,180 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $69,500 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 8608061349 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: HAYWARD RICHARD A ELVALENE Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 1 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1918 Mail: 916 SW 4TH PL; RENTON WA 98055-2226 C003 Phone: 425/226-6385 21) Situs: 359 THOMAS AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2214 C003 Lot Area: 7,380 APN: 214370-0860-08 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,280 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: THARP J J Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 1 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1941 Mail: 359 THOMAS AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2214 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 3 of 18 22) Situs: 912 SW 4TH PL,RENTON WA 98055-2226 C003 Lot Area: 7,380 APN: 214370-0861-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/31/1998 07/30/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,340 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $135,000 Zoning: R-8 Use: DUPLEX Doc#: 9807310679 Cnty Use: 102 Owners: THARP JOHN J Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1940 Mail: 359 THOMAS AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2214 C003 Phone: 23) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 800 APN: 214370-1860-06 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 24) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 800 APN: 214370-1865-01 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: ELLINGSON SHARON S Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 611 DALEY ST APT 1; EDMONDS WA 98020-3091 C015 Phone: 25) Situs: 13518 80TH AVE S,SEATTLE WA 98178-5103 C006 Lot Area: 17,795 APN: 298880-0015-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/20/1995 05/25/1995 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,990 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $124,500 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 9507201234 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: SUCKIE O'NEIL R Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J3 PAULA M SUC Full Baths: 1 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1948 Mail: 13518 80TH AVE S; SEATTLE WA 98178-5103 C006 Phone: 26) Situs: 7635 135TH AVE SE, RENTON WA 98059-3223 C070 Lot Area: 33,734 APN: 298880-0100-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/29/1999 09/20/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,220 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $131,500 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 909291656 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: STAATS KIM/SW Rooms: 4 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1943 Mail: 9766 ARROWSMITH AVE#S; SEATTLE WA 98118-5903 C056 Phone: 27) Situs: 7621 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Lot Area: 34,763 APN: 298880-0105-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/25/1983 03/25/1983 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,460 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $29,500 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 8303250659 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: CROUSE KELLY R/UM Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1942 Mail: 7621 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Phone: 28) Situs: 7609 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Lot Area: 35,973 APN: 298880-0110-02 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 2,080 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: HILL EUNICE I Rooms: 7 Bedrms: 5 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1943 Mail: 7609 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Phone: 425/255-6169 ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:4 of 18 29) Situs: 7605 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Lot Area: 27,400 APN: 298880-0115-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 04/28/1994 04/22/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,160 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $124,990 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 9404281716 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: MCDOWELL JAMES HARVEY Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1963 Mail: 7605 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Phone: 425/277-5353 30) Situs: 7601-1/2 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Lot Area: 28,806 APN: 298880-0121-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/30/1986 09/30/1986 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,320 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: RS7200 Use: SFR Doc#: 8609301515 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: WILLIAMS EVELYN Rooms: 4 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1944 Mail: 7601 1/2 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Phone: 31) Situs: 7545 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5155 C006 Lot Area: 56,628 APN: 298880-0125-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/29/1989 09/25/1989 Bldg/Liv Area: 3,760 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $135,000 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 8909290978 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: GALAROSA ALBERTO F Rooms: 7 Bedrms: 5 Map Pg: 655-J2 CANDIDA Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1940 Mail: 7545 S 135TH ST;SEATTLE WA 98178-5155 C006 Phone: 32) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 14,220 APN: 298880-0130-08 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: RS7200 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: WOOD JAMES 0 Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 7525 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5155 C006 Phone: 33) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 27,694 APN: 298880-0136-02 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R8P Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: WOOD JAMES Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 7525 S 135TH ST;SEATTLE WA 98178-5155 C006 Phone: 34) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 7,150 APN: 298880-0142-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/10/1987 07/10/1987 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $31,200 Zoning: R8P Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 8707100781 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: DEVERA ARTURO Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 4615 S FRONTENAC ST; SEATTLE WA 98118-3627 C062 Phone: 35) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 6,300 APN: 298880-0143-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/10/1987 07/10/1987 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $31,200 Zoning: R8P Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 8707100781 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: DEVERA ARTURO Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 NORMA R Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 4615 S FRONTENAC ST; SEATTLE WA 98118-3627 C062 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 5 of 18 36) Situs: 13503 80TH AVE S,SEATTLE WA 98178-5104 C006 Lot Area: 14,600 APN: 298880-0144-02 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/16/1992 12/09/1992 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,980 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $115,000 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 9212162196 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: YOUSOOFIAN MICHAEL S Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1941 Mail: 13503 80TH AVE S; SEATTLE WA 98178-5104 C006 Phone: 425/235-4819 37) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 15,900 APN: 298880-0145-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/30/1999 03/23/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $47,000 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 9903300675 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: BUI TOM V Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 VON T Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 11841 55TH AV S; SEATTLE WA 98178-2850 C012 Phone: 38) Situs: 7837 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5151 C006 Lot Area: 22,145 APN: 298880-0150-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/25/1994 10/17/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,790 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 9410250472 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: THOMSON JAMES B Rooms: 4 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1943 Mail: 7837 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5151 C006 Phone: 39) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 30,286 APN: 298880-0155-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 04/13/1994 04/05/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $69,500 Zoning: RS7200 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 9404132090 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: NAVARRO MANUEL C Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 8024 S 130TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-4942 C007 Phone: 40) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 32,459 APN: 298880-0156-07 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: RS7200 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 Owners: DONA ANTHONY Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J2 LOUELLA B Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 9903 64TH AVE S;SEATTLE WA 98118-5836 C056 Phone: 41) Situs: 7805 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5151 C006 Lot Area: 29,531 APN: 298880-0160-01 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 3,600 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: BROCKWAY W C Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1943 Mail: 7805 S 135TH ST;SEATTLE WA 98178-5151 C006 Phone: 425/255-5574 42) Situs: 7669 135TH AVE SE,RENTON WA 98059-3223 C070 Lot Area: 21,000 APN: 298880-0165-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 02/14/1997 02/12/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,280 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $141,500 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 9702140754 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: BROCKWAY BRYCE E Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: . 655-J2 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1957 Mail: 2320 HUGHES AVE SW;SEATTLE WA 98116-1836 C013 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:6 of 18 43) Situs: 7655 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Lot Area: 30,595 APN: 298880-0170-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/25/1997 09/18/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 3,620 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $185,000 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 9709251335 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: HILLESTAD STEVEN D Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J2 MARY A Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1955 Mail: 7655 S 135TH ST;SEATTLE WA 98178-5153-0006 Phone: 44) Situs: 7645 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Lot Area: 31,700 APN: 298880-0177-02 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/12/1996 09/06/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,020 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $55,549 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 9609120724 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: TAYLOR TERRY G Rooms: 4 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 65542 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1951 Mail: 7645 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5153 C006 Phone: 45) Situs: 7400 S 140TH ST, WA Lot Area: 117,195 APN: 377920-0005-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/15/1998 05/05/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,000,000 Zoning: OP Use: INDUSTRIAL ACREAGE Doc#: 9805151925 Cnty Use: 932 Owners: ANMARCO Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 9125 10TH AV S;SEATTLE WA 98108-4612 C002 Phone: 46) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 334,567 APN: 377920-0117-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/20/1992 05/19/1992 Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: $2,501,228 Zoning: RC Use: COMMERCIAL ACREAGE Doc#: 9205201349 Cnty Use: 923 Owners: CITY OF RENTON Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 200 MILL AVE S; RENTON WA 98055-2132 C087 Phone: 47) Situs: 301 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2294 C003 Lot Area: 11,361 APN: 392660-0010-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/06/1993 04/15/1993 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,540 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $140,000 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 9305061029 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: LIMON BONIFACIO C JR Rooms: 7 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 MARGAR Full Baths: 2 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1991 Mail: 9030 SEWARD PARK AVE S APT 50; OSEATTLE WA 98118-6072 C046 Phone: 48) Situs: 307 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2294 C003 Lot Area: 7,720 APN: 392660-0020-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/26/1992 05/11/1992 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,700 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $144,950 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 9205261217 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: WONG BING KWAN Rooms: 9 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 CHAU LING PA Full Baths: 2 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1991 Mail: 307 OAKESDALE AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2294 C003 Phone: 49) Situs: 270 NACHES AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2295 C003 Lot Area: 7,358 APN: 392660-0030-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 01/04/1995 01/03/1995 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,220 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $145,000 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 9501041853 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: GRANT ROBERT R&JANET Rooms: 7 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1993 Mail: 270 NACHES AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2295 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 7 of 18 50) Situs: 721 151ST ST SW, WA Lot Area: 7,244 APN: 392660-0040-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/29/1994 12/13/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,700 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $144,000 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 9412291293 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: JUBANE JOSE C Rooms: 9 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1991 Mail: 276 NACHES AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2295 C003 Phone: 51) Situs: 325 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2294 C003 Lot Area: 9,250 APN: 392660-0050-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/26/1999 03/22/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,540 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $174,900 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 9903260989 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: LE PHI Rooms: 7 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1991 Mail: 325 OAKESDALE AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2294 C003 Phone: 52) Situs: 331 OAKESDALE AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2294 C003 Lot Area: 7,531 APN: 392660-0060-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 02/10/1997 02/06/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,700 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $143,000 Zoning: R I Use: SFR Doc#: 9702100957 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: LEE LINA C Rooms: 9 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1991 Mail: 16580 SE 49TH ST; BELLEVUE WA 98006-5898 C008 Phone: 53) Situs: 1124 SW SUNSET BLVD,RENTON WA 98055-2266 C003 Lot Area: 13,920 APN: 747190-0005-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 04/25/1988 04/25/1988 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,880 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 8804250469 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: BALOGH JAMES/SM Rooms: 8 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1934 Mail: PO BOX 3781; SEATTLE WA 98124-3781 B008 Phone: 54) Situs: , WA Lot Area: 6,960 APN: 747190-0015-09 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R I Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: Cnty Use: 901 ' Owners: CLAYTON GRACY Rooms: Bedrms: Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: Mail: 108 SPRING PL; ENUMCLAW WA 98022-8439 R002 Phone: 55) Situs: 321 POWELL AVE SW,RENTON WA 98055-2254 C003 Lot Area: 13,920 APN: 747190-0020-02 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/19/1985 07/19/1985 Bldg/Liv Area: 970 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $59,000 Zoning: RI Use: SFR Doc#: 8507190342 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: GNAGY MARK S Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1947 Mail: 321 POWELL AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2254 C003 Phone: 425/235-8123 56) Situs: 313 POWELL AVE SW,RENTON WA 98055-2254 C003 Lot Area: 6,155 APN: 747190-0030-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 08/22/1985 08/22/1985 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,780 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $51,000 Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 8508220620 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: BAUMGARDNER WILLIAM B Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 DORINNE G Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1955 Mail: 313 POWELL AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2254 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 8 of 18 57) Situs: 309 POWELL AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2254 C003 Lot Area: 6,678 APN: 747190-0035-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/03/1987 03/03/1987 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,340 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 8703030486 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: BODENHAMER MARY A Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1961 Mail: 309 POWELL AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2254 C003 Phone: 425/255-8748 58) Situs: 1105 SW 3RD ST SW, WA Lot Area: 6,219 APN: 747190-0043-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/09/1998 09/24/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,720 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $179,950 Zoning: R-8 Use: RESIDENTIAL LOT Doc#: 9810091176 Cnty Use: 901 Owners: TEAM CONSTRUCTION Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: 2 Half: 1 Yr Built: 1998 Mail: 3431 96TH AVE NE; BELLEVUE WA 98004-1706 C043 Phone: 59) Situs: 317 POWELL AVE SW, RENTON WA 98055-2254 C003 Lot Area: 7,147 APN: 747190-0045-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/10/1995 05/09/1995 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,760 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R-8 Use: SFR Doc#: 9505101236 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: EASTMAN STEPHEN E Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 HAZEL D Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1936 Mail: 317 POWELL AVE SW; RENTON WA 98055-2254 C003 Phone: 60) Situs: 7273 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5157 C006 Lot Area: 45,738 APN: 801360-0065-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/17/1985 10/17/1985 Bldg/Liv Area: 2,700 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $107,000 Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: 8510170606 Cnty Use: 101 Owners: PROCTOR DOUGLAS L Rooms: 6 Bedrms: 4 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 1 Half: Yr Built: 1950 Mail: 7273 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5157 C006 Phone: 61) Situs: 7285 S 135TH ST,SEATTLE WA 98178-5157 C006 Lot Area: 45,738 APN: 801360-0070-00 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 2,540 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: R8P Use: SFR Doc#: Cnty Use: 101 Owners: KLINE LLOYD D Rooms: 5 Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J2 Full Baths: 2 Half: Yr Built: 1950 Mail: 7285 S 135TH ST; SEATTLE WA 98178-5157 C006 Phone: 425/255-8105 62) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 1,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0010-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/07/1992 10/01/1992 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,124 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9210071524 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: ONEIL PETER C K Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 LAVERNA Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-1; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 425/271-7155 63) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 2,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0020-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/23/1997 09/18/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 981 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $85,500 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9709231471 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: HO THAI Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-2; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page:9 of 18 64) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 3, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0030-06 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 981 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: HOUSTON MITSU M Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-3; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 65) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 4,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0040-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/30/1996 09/18/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 985 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $84,550 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9609300968 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: BROOKS SHANNON N Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 66) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 5, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0050-01 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 984 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: RACOOSIN ELIZABETH R Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-5; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 425/277-8325 67) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 6,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0060-09 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,099 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: GRANT WILLIE J Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 JUANITA Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV A-6; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 425/226-4851 68) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 7, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0070-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/30/1996 09/19/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,190 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $98,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9609300901 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: KURZ BRENDA L Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV B; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 69) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 8, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0080-05 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,184 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: GOODWIN VIRGIL L Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV B-8; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 70) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 9,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0090-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 01/11/1994 01/05/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,184 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $98,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9401110864 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: KYCEK ALAN J Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 14311 124TH AVE NE 113; KIRKLAND WA 98034-1459 CO22 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 10 of 18 71) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 10, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0100-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/29/1998 07/02/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,184 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $104,950 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9807290631 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: COOK MICHAEL A Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT B10; RENTON WA 98055-2285 C003 Phone: 72) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 11, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0110-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/04/1996 10/01/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,190 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $103,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9610041013 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: RICKEY JEANNE S Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT B11; RENTON WA 98055-2285 C003 Phone: 73) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 12,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0120-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/02/1998 08/26/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,124 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $105,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9809021208 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: MCLEOD RHONDA L Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-12; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 74) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 13,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0130-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/22/1990 10/15/1990 Bldg/Liv Area: 985 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $83,500 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9010220643 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: PATTON CHARLENE A Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-13; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 75) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 14,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0140-03 Rec/Sale Dt: . Bldg/Liv Area: 986 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: SILVEO ALMA S Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV 14-C; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 76) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 15, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0150-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 11/25/1997 11/21/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 986 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $89,450 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9711251408 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: REESE MELISSA A Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV C-15; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 77) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 16, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0160-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/31/1996 12/23/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 986 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $88,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9612310744 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: SLADE JEFFREY D Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV C; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 11 of 18 78) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 17, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0170-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/30/1998 07/21/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,054 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $109,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9807301643 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: BURCHETT GEORFFREY Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 SHEILA Y Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 79) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 18,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0180-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/10/1997 06/05/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,124 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $96,500 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9706100633 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: JONES CURRY D Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 JACQUELYN M Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV D-18; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 80) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 19, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0190-02 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/22/1993 06/16/1993 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $105,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9306221072 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: FISHER RICHARD C Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT D19; RENTON WA 98055-2286 C003 Phone: 81) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 20, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0200-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/02/1997 11/16/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9705020644 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: FUNCK MARK C Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV D-20; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 82) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 21, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0210-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 04/23/1996 01/23/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,125 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9604230853 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: REUTER PATRICIA L Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT D21; RENTON WA 98055-2286 C003 Phone: 83) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 22,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0220-06 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,054 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: CHICHESTER CAROLE A Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 84) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 23,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0230-04 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: FOWLER THOMAS Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 AMY M Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#E 23; RENTON WA 98056-2286 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 12 of 18 85) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 24,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0240-02 Rec/Sale Dt: 08/26/1997 08/18/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $99,500 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9708260677 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: CARPENTER VICTORIA LYNN Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT E24; RENTON WA 98055-2287 C003 Phone: 86) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 25,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0250-09 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: KHALIFE MARILYN Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV E-25; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 425/277-8781 87) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 26, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0260-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/29/1994 07/26/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $103,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9407291959 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: LEATHERMAN HISAKO Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV E-26; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 88) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 27, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0270-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/17/1994 06/09/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,129 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $103,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9406170001 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: TONG DONALD Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV 27; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 425/226-6504 89) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 28, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0280-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 01/23/1998 01/22/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,188 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $99,500 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9801231735 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: CARNAHAN P Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 1700 BELLEVUE AVE APT 505;SEATTLE WA 98122-2079 C003 Phone: 90) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 29, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0290-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/20/1997 10/13/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,180 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $96,900 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9710200831 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: URH MARIAN Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV F-29; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 91) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 30, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0300-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 11/26/1997 11/21/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,184 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $100,400 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9711260395 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: HEIMBIGNER LYNDA L Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV F-30; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 13 of 18 92) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 31, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0310-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/01/1990 09/25/1990 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,184 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $98,500 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9010010628 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: ROBERTS LOIS JEAN Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT F31; RENTON WA 98055-2288 C003 Phone: 93) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 32,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0320-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/30/1996 09/26/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,190 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $99,950 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9609302186 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: POMERLEAU JOSEPH A Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 USCHI S Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT F32; RENTON WA 98055-2288 C003 Phone: 94) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 33,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0330-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 04/29/1994 04/27/1994 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,202 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $102,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9404291165 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: BRECKENRIDGE SCOTT Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 95) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 34, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0340-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/19/1998 06/18/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,182 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $101,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9806192160 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: BISCONER LEONARD Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 ROSWITHA B Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G34; RENTON WA 98055-2288 C003 Phone: 96) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 35, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0350-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 10/30/1996 10/29/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,184 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $101,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9610301459 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: BOWSER MICHAEL L Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G35; RENTON WA 98055-2288 C003 Phone: 97) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 36, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0360-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/17/1998 03/12/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,184 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $102,500 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9803170285 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: KHIN SIMON MAUNG SHWE Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G36; RENTON WA 98055-2289 C003 Phone: 98) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 37,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0370-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/18/1998 09/11/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,190 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $106,950 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9809181921 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: HOFFMANN JEFFREY J Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT G37; RENTON WA 98055-2289 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 14 of 18 99) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 38, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0380-02 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,124 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: HANSEN BARBARA J Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-38; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 100) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 39,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0390-00 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: BARNES GEORGE L Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 LILY Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-39; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 425/277-8031 101) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 40,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0400-08 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: WOODSIDE LEE I Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV H-40; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 102) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 41, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0410-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/30/1997 09/23/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,124 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $99,960 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9709301653 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: LOWE WANDA L Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 233 SW SUNSET BLV 41; RENTON WA 98055-2318 C003 Phone: 103) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 42, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0420-04 Rec/Sale Dt: 06/04/1999 05/28/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,124 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $108,500 Zoning: R2 Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9906042114 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: HAYES ROBERT Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#I-42; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 104) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 43, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: . 506,347 APN: 811990-0430-02 Rec/Sale Dt: 08/31/1999 08/25/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,158 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $111,500 Zoning: R2 Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9908311470 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: YU WEI L&YUCHAN C Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET LVD#I43; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 105) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 44, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0440-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/22/1998 12/11/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,160 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $105,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9812222393 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: DEGROSS MICHAEL L Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV I-44; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 15 of 18 106) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 45,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0450-07 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,124 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: HOLM JEFF A Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 15221 SE FAIRWOOD BLV; RENTON WA 98058-8645 CO20 Phone: 107) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 46, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0460-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 05/01/1998 04/28/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,129 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $104,950 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9805012125 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: COLE DINO A Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV 46; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 108) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 47, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0470-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/07/1999 07/02/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $115,000 Zoning: R2 Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9907071382 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: JONES KELVIN Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 5227 56TH AVE S; SEATTLE WA 98118-2512 C003 Phone: 109) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 48, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0480-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 12/19/1997 12/18/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $100,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9712190601 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: KUBLI JAMES H Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV J; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 110) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 49, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0490-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/31/1993 03/16/1993 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $103,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9303310897 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: SAKO_JULIE L Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT J49; RENTON WA 98055-2291 C003 Phone: 111) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BV# J-50,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0500-07 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/30/1999 09/30/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,161 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $118,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9909300664 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: CHEN WEI/EA Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#J50; RENTON WA 98055-2291 C003 Phone: 112) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 51, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0510-05 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/20/1990 09/08/1990 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,123 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $91,700 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9009200450 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: LEW RAYMOND WING Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV 3J-51; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: © 1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 16 of 18 113) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 52, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0520-03 Rec/Sale Dt: 09/16/1999 09/10/1999 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,126 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $118,500 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9909161300 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: BARAJAS PATRICIA Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD#K52; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 114) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 53, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0530-01 Rec/Sale Dt: 08/28/1997 08/19/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 984 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $89,900 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9708280617 Cnty Use: 123 . Owners: ROEMISH JACQUELINE R Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT K53; RENTON WA 98055-2291 C003 Phone: 115) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 54,RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0540-09 Rec/Sale Dt: 01/06/1998 12/31/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,127 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $103,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9801060598 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: KLINE DAVID R ZANATTA KLINE Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 3806 13TH AVE W; SEATTLE WA 98119-1312 C033 Phone: 116) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 55, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0550-06 Rec/Sale Dt: 03/10/1997 02/25/1997 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,123 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $92,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9703101403 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: PHUNG LISA N Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV APT L55; RENTON WA 98055-2292 C003 Phone: 117) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 56, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0560-04 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 985 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: REINGOLD EVELYN JOYCE Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV L-56; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 118) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 57, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0570-02 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,126 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: GO EMMANUEL S Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 MARISSA F Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV L-57; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 119) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 58, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0580-00 Rec/Sale Dt: 07/31/1996 07/29/1996 Bldg/Liv Area: 1,126 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $90,000 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9607311898 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: WHITE MOZELLA R Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 : Phone: ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 17 of 18 120) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 59, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0590-08 Rec/Sale Dt: 04/30/1998 04/15/1998 Bldg/Liv Area: 985 County: KING,WA Sale Price: $90,501 Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: 9804301695 Cnty Use: 123 Owners: HENDERSON MEAGAN L Rooms: Bedrms: 2 Map Pg: 655-J3 CARL E Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV 59; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 121) Situs: 833 SW SUNSET BLVD 60, RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Lot Area: 506,347 APN: 811990-0600-06 Rec/Sale Dt: Bldg/Liv Area: 1,125 County: KING,WA Sale Price: Zoning: Use: CONDOMINIUM Doc#: Cnty Use: 123 Owners: MILLER JOHN A JR Rooms: Bedrms: 3 Map Pg: 655-J3 GLORIA J Full Baths: Half: Yr Built: 1990 Mail: 833 SW SUNSET BLV M-60; RENTON WA 98055-2296 C003 Phone: 425/277-3768 ©1996 Win2Data 2000 Page: 18 of 18 •4'.y19S1:�„`an arx,sF4[.a6eV•u�e.ewaawra.Gpi"•.,�xyu..e�Vi..,..y..uca ,a=- :.w.s. ..,...._.,�v�,.�.-_sa- �,.�.. ., _ �.--�_ TY.. •i:�i lafignalinilis� eggisommemegiostammos • ..r:.::.:::::.t:::;t•::tt•:;..:::..• ...r:::.;.::.:..::::FF!::t::FF•:':t:FFFFF`;F;F¢'FF::F::FFF�.:x,:>•F: }::.:,:.::::.:::�:.::.:r•::::.F•'FF:.:;::F.�:::.9'':,:'::::F. ::.............:::�:: ..........:::.::::..,, • ':(:. `F::{F�}?:{:�}}!is?ti:FF::2:::L<Li:::::iY.;i,.:�:•yL::}�:�$':::r�. '::ri.:•`.`: '::S:'<•F:':.`'t: $7ii:::.:FFF::;!•F:::'F:F`:;2x::%::'rX:t: :. ... . ..... : : >P :ERTYi::'OWR S : INFORMATION�NNote, It there(9 ryfora than ono Iogal bvynOrt ptPf 4 Ltl ct;:ffl ddil(briUl notarftti8 6sfeiiixo)Ciition fedw6 wawa rminiggsomiligiiRaMwa PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME:Donald M. Merlin and Donna M. Merlin; Merlin SR900 Property Comprehensive Plan Donald J. Merlin and Joan P. Merlin; Map and Text Amendments and Rezone (see and Quarry Industrial Park, LLC accompanying "Project Narrative" for the c/o Donald J. Merlin text ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION:text amendment) ADDRESS: Stoneway Concrete South side of SR900 from approximately 76th 1915 Maple Valley Highway Avenue S. (King County addressing) to Thomas Avenue SW CITY: Renton ZIP: 98055 • KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): ' 132304-9006-09 and 132304-9010-03 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (425) 226-1000 EXISTING LAND USE(S): • Vacant .ICA.,...T..t(I•••oter:than<:...wn..r)::t:.;:.;.:.::.::.>:::..:: PROPOSED LAND USES: • • NAME: Same as property owners Multi-Family Residential COMPANY (if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: North'portion: EhplcgrEnt Area arrra2naial. (EAC) Southeast portion: Dr k nazt Area OEfice (EAO) Southwest: portion: Raral Elxir3 nt-;al (RR) ADDRESS: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Multi-Family Residential CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: • North portion prezoned Arterial Qbial (CA) Southeast portion zoned dial Office (CO) TELEPHONE NUMBER: • 1 Southwest portion. zoned Pescurte QZL Vat cn (RC PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): .:,,..:::<.;..... .:.: ..::..::.::::.>'.::::.>:.>::>:.;;>;:.>:::::>: ::.::>:>:.::»:: Resident ial Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) • SITE AREA(SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: David L. Halinen 27.09 acres (including 3.14 acres of the unimproved S. 140th Street right-of-way) COMPANY (if applicable): PROJECT VALUE: Halinen Law Offices, P.S. N/A • ADDRESS: 10500 NE 8th Street, Suite 1900 IS THE SITE LOCATED,IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? •No. CITY: Bellevue ZIP: 98004 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF'ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? •TELEPHONE NUMBER: Not to our knowledge. (206) 443-4684 <: .... G..... .ES g.iir 7. ....:P... . . .... Attach;>se nrrr;T:; st.. t. f .. 1 f See attached E :><::::>: ::>::::: ...:;:. ::::::::'.>:::>::: : ...i.•:»»i.:::: kitII.: If �. ion:: es:th�t:::a 1 :-.p :?;00f.f:.w.41.deter.mR.)•gi:fQvs�::>::;:.::::;:;:.:>::>::::..i .::.;::•,,.: . ..:....,.......:•:>..�:::::..::.....::::.:Che �Pp. �. .t. . gip ., . Pp Y::� .Y.......: ............. ...... .. ..... .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. _ANNEXATION , $ SUBDIVISION: X COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ 500. x REZONE $ q-,000:' LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $_ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT $ _CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ • FINAL PLAT $ _GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ • (NO.'CU. YDS: ) • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER $ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ — ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANd �., L _ �-®$ ' • EXEMPTII ( 7�jv/ '_ " -- x .ENVII—'^rr_nt_REVIEW $ O. i REVISIO! -Zii /o,/ ) / Rex p4.i_ 1,y(Print Nom / ' / S ck ono) tl / r,: authorizod re 'i Ioor of;Jill ��,Q f4 horoin contained ar, 7 1 Ira and corroo "'��--C� / P /(�� C 1 ATTE, u p M T II and I � h/r , 10 44 i forth \ . i a s-cp. /4,4 /_,,,,reed , __I L 1,1190)42 , • '; • (-1 "-1- 8-77A. //2,, i r 6 it o o f st: m' #. Cl t". .:i^: ..nv Irq:::• .`i'': v.•:v.a:•.•i'r Y• ,k•r A:. p A '•.> F U' A�'sCU0H::•:i EC'.:•:::: I_A..• ..::r#s` y:•....;,:>�:::�>:;:>:•MHP:«:r: . .0 .....FP...P..f':R';�>:RVMP:>`:<SiA.A?<:: A=N<:.;: . . ::.;;: :L= .>'>;:. :::><• a<:> �« :: . .:><<...�. .;.;; : .. ..�P .. �. S SNPL.A,...S.HP N .. �h.:...:SiVL:,.;.�MC:....TW,.::.VA.. V4I: �V I I W'.; :> :; :>:<::.<»»;:: :»:<:»>T.0-1"AL'.:FEES...::.5.:. ..;.:.:.. .:.::::.::::::,'<.> ;;::TO � �° . � GE��' : VID- :: >'<::�.::<:��:;.:;<: >;::«:�>;,:;<:: : :::;.:•••: .::...:,.::.:::!:.;: •;: ::!:i;!::•: :;•:: .:.:....:. .. .. ::.::; : :::::..: :. ..TAL F.O.STA ,P(�0. : C17;:::: ....1" :I. MASTEI AP.DOC REVISED W97 41 . 34. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 15 1999. LEGAL DESCRIPTION RECEIVED POLICY NO. 365862-5K THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7 AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13 , TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF SUNSET HIGHWAY (PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2) AND NORTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, AND SAINT PAUL RAILWAY CO. AND PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. ; INCLUDING VACATED PORTION OF 82ND AVENUE SOUTH AND OF VACATED SOUTH 140TH STREET ADJOINING SAID PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING IN THE PLAT OF EARLINGTON ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 14 OF PLATS, PAGE 7, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER LYING SOUTH OF A LINE DRAWN FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 15 OF BLOCK 13 OF SAID PLAT OF EARLINGTON AND RUNNING THENCE WESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 1250 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND SAINT PAUL RAILWAY CO. AND OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. SAID POINT BEING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACKS OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. AT A POINT THEREIN DISTANCE ABOUT 2050 FEET WESTERLY MEASURED ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. AS NOW LOCATED ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13 ; AND EXCEPT ALL OF THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR BEACON COAL MINE COMPANY ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1702983 . SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. J-10/92 jg DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 15 1999 AFFIDAVITS OF OWNERSHIP RECEIVED We, GARY M. MERLINO and DONNA M. MERLINO, husband and wife, declare that(1) we have a 30%tenancy-in-common ownership interest in the property involved in the Merlino SR900 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone Application and(2)the statements and answers contained in the accompanying City of Renton Master Application for the Merlino SR900 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone Application are in all respects true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. GARY M. MERLINO ONNA M. MERL O ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to on the /4- day .fDecember, 1999 before me,allotary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at Pit.L • [Si nature of Nary Pub te/t41 We, DONALD J. MERLINO and JOAN P. MERLINO, husband and wife, declare that (1) we have a 30%tenancy-in-common ownership interest in the property involved in the Merlino SR900 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone Application and(2)the statements and answers contained in the accompanying City of Renton Master Application for the Merlino SR900 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone Application are in all respects true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. 444-1 g: DONALD J. INO P. MERLINO ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to on the J-1 day of December, 1999 before me,a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at ,Ke(� Gt(f2 ,u ,a/ S' nature of Notary ubli Page 1 of 2 a• 3 • I, GARY M. MERLINO, declare that (1) I am a manager of QUARRY INDUSTRIAL PARK,LLC,a Washington limited liability company,(2)QUARRY INDUSTRIAL PARK,LLC has a 40% tenancy-in-common ownership interest in the property involved in the Merlino SR900 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone Application, and(3)the statements and answers contained in the accompanying City of Renton Master Application for the Merlino SR900 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone Application are in all respects true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. GARY . MERLINO ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to on the /Ir.' day ofDecember, 1999 before me,a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at / a1 (44 - // /0 - $ nature of Notary, .ubl' D:\CR2068\003\Comp-Plan-Amendment\AFFIDAVIT-OF-OWNERSHIP.DI.wpd Page 2 of 2 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON DEC 15 1999 PROJECT NARRATIVE RECEIVED Justification for the Merlino SR 900 Property Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone Project Name: Merlino SR 900 Property Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments and Rezone Project Location: South side of SR 900 (known.as "Martin Luther King, Jr. Way S." in unincorporated King County and "S.W. Sunset Boulevard" in the City of Renton) from approximately 76'h Avenue S. (King County addressing) to Thomas Ave. S.W. (Renton addressing) (with the site partially in unincorporated King County and partially within the City of Renton) Current Use: Vacant Land Current Zoning: The north portion of the site (which is in unincorporated King County) is prezoned Arterial Commercial (CA); the southeast portion of the site is zoned Commercial Office (CO); the southwest corner of the site is zoned Resource Conservation (RC)—see the Neighborhood Detail Map Proposed Zoning: Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I) Proposed Use: Multi-family residential development Proposed by: Gary M. Merlino and Donald J. Merlino 1. The Applicants' Requested Changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps The Merlinos hereby request the following changes to the subject property's existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations and Zoning classifications: (a) An amendment of the property's Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designations from Employment Area Commercial (EAC) (which encompasses approximately 17.54 acres, including 3.14 acres of unimproved S. 140'h Street right-of- way), Employment Area Office (EAO) () (which encompasses approximately 8.47 acres) and Rural Residential (RR) ) (which encompasses approximately 1.08 acres) to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I); and • (b) An amendment of the property's Zoning Classifications from Arterial Commercial (CA) (prezoned), Commercial Office (CO), and Resource Conservation (RC) to Residential Multi-Family Infill (RM-I). Page 1 of 5 Proj-Nar-v 1.F 1 12/15/99 The Merlinos also hereby request the following text amendment to existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policy LU-69 (with the proposed additional text illustrated by underlining): (Proposed Amended) Policy LU-69. Residential Multi-family Infill designations should not be expanded. (Application of this designation to properties lying between parcels that already have this designation shall not be considered an inappropriate "expansion" but, rather, an acceptable "infill".) Land within the districts should be used efficiently to meet multi- family housing needs. • 2. Size and Location of the Site The 27.09-acre subject property (which includes 3.14 acres of the unimproved S. 140th Street right-of-way that runs from west to east through the property) is located on the south side of SR 900 (known as "Martin Luther King, Jr. Way S." in unincorporated King County and "S.W. Sunset Boulevard" in the City of Renton) from approximately 76th Avenue S. (based on unincorporated King County addressing) on the west to Thomas Ave. S.W. (based on Renton addressing) on the east. The site currently lies partially in unincorporated King County and partially within the City of Renton. 4. Current Use of Site and Any Existing Improvements The site is currently vacant with no'existing improvements. 5. Special Site Features The site is relatively narrow from west to east (tapering in width to a sharp point at the extreme east end) with approximately 2,800 feet of frontage along SR 900. The entire site slopes down southerly from SR 900, providing opportunities for southerly views of the Kent Valley and Mount Rainier in conjunction with development of the site. The sloping site is conducive to terraced development of the type of multi-family residential structures permitted by the City's RM-I zoning regulations. (Terraced multi- family residential development.exists in the Empire Estates Apartments development, which lies on the parcel abutting the northerly portion of the subject site's west boundary.) Page 2 of 5 Proj-Nar-v 1.F1 12/15/99 6. Location of Existing Structures The site has no existing structures. 7. Responses to the following Decision Criteria: A. The CPA/Rezone bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety or welfare. The requested Comprehensive Plan Amendments and rezone, if granted, would allow for the provision of multi-family housing on the subject property, which would increase the City's tax base. B. The CPA/Rezone addresses changing circumstances or the needs of the City as a Whole. The City of Renton as a whole is experiencing a substantial demand for residential real estate of all types as a result of the recent strong upsurge in the local economy. This proposal would allow for multi-family housing on the subject property (which is in strong demand in the local housing market) and would provide close-in housing opportunities for employees of local businesses. C. The CPA/Rezone is compatible with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan or other policies or goals of the City The following discussion of applicable Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policies demonstrates that the requested Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment and rezone are'compatible with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan General Residential Policies: Policy LU-11 Consistent with subsection d of this policy, the proposal would provide for multi-family development as infill in an existing multi-family residential area. (See the accompanying Neighborhood Detail Map, which illustrates that the subject site is sandwiched between existing multi-family developments to the east and west.) Page 3 of 5 Proj-Nar-v 1.F 1 12/15/99 Residential-Types Policies Policy LU-15 The future multi-family housing that will be made possible by the proposal is one of the housing types that Policy LU- 15 encourages as part of a city-wide mix of housing types. Residential Multi-family Infill Policies (Proposed Amended) Policy LU-69 Especially with the proposed amendment to this policy that is set forth on page 2, above, the proposed MF-I Comprehensive Plan Map designation for the subject property is appropriate as "infill" because the subject property lies between parcels that already have the MF-I designation. D. The CPA/Rezone is compatible with and not materially detrimental to adjacent Land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. Multi-family residential development pursuant to the proposed amendments will be very compatible adjacent with adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods. The abutting lands to the east and west are already developed with multi-family housing. Further, SR 900 provides a substantial separation between the subject site and the single-family neighborhood to the north. E. The CPA/Rezone will not result in development which will adversely impact community facilities, including but not limited to utilities, transportation, parks or schools According to David Christensen, Utility Engineering Supervisor of the City of Renton Waste Water Section, the existing City of Renton 12-inch diameter sewer . main in 68'h Avenue South (to the west of the site) has adequate capacity to provide sewer service for multi-family-residential development of the subject property. (The applicant owns abutting property between the subject site and 68th Avenue South and will be able to construct a connecting sewer main between 68'h Avenue South and the subject site.) According to Abdoul Gafour, Water Utility Supervisor of the City of Renton Utilities Division, (a) the subject property lies within the City's water service area, (b) a 12-inch diameter main lies in SR 900 approximately as far west as Powell Avenue SW, (c) an existing 16- inch diameter line lies in 68'h Avenue South (to the west of the site), and (d) suitable connection(s) to these lines should provide adequate water service to the subject property. In addition, abutting SR 900 has adequate traffic capacity Page 4 of 5 Proj-Nar-v 1.F 1 12/15/99 to provide roadway access to the subject property. In view of the City's park mitigation fee requirements, the proposed development is not anticipated to adversely impact City parks. The Renton School District is believed to have adequate capacity to serve anticipated students who would live in a completed multi-family development on the subject property. F. The subject property is suitable for development in general conformance with zoning standards under the proposed zoning classification. Using an approach of terracing the sloped site with multi-family residential buildings, the subject property is suitable for development in general conformance with zoning standards under the proposed RM-I zoning classification. Page5of5 Proj-Nar-v l.F1 12/15/99 • „�E.., .1,;; ,.ii,D.... .:rN:i�� ,ice i,:,', _-_ d, N ,,t, '•,',4V,. ..40:v. .2, N' rr,�` y1J J/ :i ��' �}:, ,.�. :;'n,. L:i,4i',.e:•�st:, .dYr b1?; dt4. _ _ V.I., ,;14, JI:;�� •t ;J.,n ':,,y,;;:;,,no.'?�,.4r ,}',? r.�3,•, ;y f `\ '... dki }lf• +dJAr:P0' +tll(ola �110,,,;•'/O ' ff�\ O v 1`-' �1s.4`1p1�= Fsi ,1.4i e i• 1')•• N.!i'`' y) •�'G "I'�.1fi•��:;!:'•1fi:�,c.4,,fi,Pl'�G,'!!P,N�'��AMP •e -O �Aw sY""^`°Y'�fhb:!•. .,RCN dlt•AA1:�;',s i t;, ,yi �.t �y`,k, 1 •d Form No. 1402.92 _ r,, t.. �`+ I - „.i I,0/17/92) ,\1 "' DEC 1 999 ON .A:;;, \' ALTA Owner's Poiicy ' �ksJ C r1: ile 4LICY OF. TITLE INSU :1AED , 40 ?{ � RECEIVED •C A n, i'`. `� DEC 1099 � ,.�.,. AO HALINEN LAW OFFICES P.S. wotn- "= , ISSUED BY ` i i<: , First American Title Insurance Company 6 ;., FAR, 4eskt!i y, 40,104 ' SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE,THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE __ * B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California VW corporation, herein called the Company,insures,as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A,against loss or damage, ' ;. = not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: rs' - e* 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; * ;� , e' 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; i ;;:: % 3. Unmarketability of the title; *.;� gat 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. !_ . The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys'fees and expenses incurred;in defense of the title, as insured, but *{ , only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. < >.°;. iOt r . tit LtEr 1; I,:r ft First American Title Insurance Company a,;', ,• alr BY sit, J PRESIDENT ' ' .; n7 TEST 7.)7/74,,,i !�— `�'r�i�� sCcaC'IARY , ?,``_,:i; i'lrJk,. err . '4 f lvi§ •urr x v�•a ,;;V a, h wl v iw vat tree' m 'Vp wy; MAW aP• ,41t,t1 t;',. rTi �1 �r .$+�' �� p�� '•�Gsi+1��D?in"�y1V �r ds�.,Ti�4`g� �v�1'V'SF;�.�V � �i. � >9 �,y '1�QVE • v '} 1.".qp �1�$ '�}11R4yjglr-. :irl¢y/( �`�„�:�11�$::?(U11�� ;• F9Cri.,•• �1 }f9(( =;. '1}�91 C4fjr •,'ryi:'a: r. r/ ti � ..��n};'�;�0.v •��}��7�.��`•��"��pp yy','� •,',tpr•ffor.. •into`:1 m(A•i'le', ':7�ii,,,ItiAlt,�r.,.itt"� i �}l �,�'; v:,�st of iS•`,y'•SA .-, `y,.iW; ''? *:.;„, . �,{.1l ? �,: rl •1 Cy�e � p,i r; ,i 04 r 1 `1% r �`5 =. _ 1,4.,/I • • RECEIVED WIC C •l. i. 1999 AMEN LAW OFFICES, P.S. SCHEDULE A POLICY NO. 365862-5K AMOUNT OF INSURANCE: PREMIUM: IIIIIIIIII DATE OF POLICY: JANUARY 9, 1998 AT 4 :22PM 1 . NAME OF INSURED: GARY M. MERLINO AND DONNA M. MERLINO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO A 30% INTEREST; DONALD J. MERLINO AND JOAN P. MERLINO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS TO A 30% INTEREST; AND QUARRY INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO A 40% INTEREST 2 . THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND WHICH IS COVERED BY THIS POLICY IS: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE 3 . TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND IS VESTED IN: THE NAMED INSURED 4 . THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED ON SCHEDULE A-4 ATTACHED. • jg PAGE 1 of 4 4 SCHEDULE B POLICY NO. 365862-5K EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE (AND THE COMPANY WILL NOT PAY COSTS, ATTORNEY' S FEES OR EXPENSES) WHICH ARISE BY REASON OF: PART ONE: 1 . TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2 . ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTEREST, OR CLAIMS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT WHICH COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF SAID LAND OR BY MAKING INQUIRY OF PERSONS IN POSSESSION THEREOF. 3 . EASEMENTS, CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS OR ENCUMBRANCES WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS . 4 . DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY WOULD DISCLOSE, AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY PUBLIC RECORDS. 5 . (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C)WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER; WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A) , (B) OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (D) INDIAN TRIBAL CODES OR REGULATIONS, INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES . 6 . ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS . 7 . ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE, CONSTRUCTION, TAP OR REIMBURSEMENT CHARGES/COSTS FOR SEWER, WATER, GARBAGE OR ELECTRICITY. jg PAGE 2 of 4 SCHEDULE B PART TWO: POLICY NO. 365862-5K 1 . GENERAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS, IF ANY, FOR THE YEAR 1998, IN AN AMOUNT NOT YET AVAILABLE, WHICH CANNOT BE PAID UNTIL FEBRUARY 15, 1998 . TAX ACCOUNT NO.. : 132304-9006-09 AND 132304-9010-03 2 . DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: GARY M. MERLINO AND DONNA M. MERLINO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, DONALD J. MERLINO AND JOAN P. MERLINO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND QUARRY INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TRUSTEE: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BENEFICIARY: HAWK FAMILY PROPERTIES, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND LLOYAL L. NEWBURN AMOUNT: SECURITY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF AN AGREEMENT DATED: JANUARY 8, 1998 RECORDED: JANUARY 9, 1998 RECORDING NO. : 9801091438 3 . EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN, IN DOCUMENT: RECORDED: MARCH 12, 1918 RECORDING NO. : 1198403 IN FAVOR OF: CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY FOR: ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINE AFFECTS : AS CONSTRUCTED OR LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED 4 . A RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED ON DECEMBER 12, 1990 UNDER RECORDING NO. 9012129007 . 5 . RIGHT OF RENTON ORDINANCE NO. 4598, ESTABLISHING ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9605141026 . END OF SCHEDULE B jg PAGE 3 of 4 SCHEDULE A-4 POLICY NO. 365862-5K THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7 AND THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTH OF SUNSET HIGHWAY (PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 2) AND NORTH OF THE RIGHT OF WAY TO THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, AND SAINT PAUL RAILWAY CO. AND PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. ; INCLUDING VACATED PORTION OF 82ND AVENUE SOUTH AND OF VACATED SOUTH 140TH STREET ADJOINING SAID PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING IN THE PLAT OF EARLINGTON ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 14.: OF, PLATS, PAGE 7, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER LYING SOUTH OF A LINE DRAWN FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 15 OF BLOCK 13 OF SAID PLAT OF EARLINGTON AND RUNNING THENCE WESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 1250 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND SAINT PAUL RAILWAY CO. AND OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO.. SAID POINT BEING AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACKS OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. AT A POINT THEREIN DISTANCE ABOUT 2050 FEET WESTERLY MEASURED ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN TRACK OF THE PACIFIC COAST RAILROAD CO. AS NOW LOCATED ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13 ; AND EXCEPT ALL OF THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR BEACON COAL MINE COMPANY ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1702983 . SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. J-10/92 jg PAGE 4 of 4 • October 19, 1998 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISIONS APPELLANT: Friends of the Black River Appeal of ERC's Determination for Black River Corporate Park File No.: LUA98-110,AAD APPLICANT: LPN Architects&Planners (Black River Corporate Park,Tract B File No.: LUA=98-075,SA-H,SM LOCATION: Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 7th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To develop 12.53 acre site with five buildings totaling 148,834 square feet. SUMMARY OF APPEAL: Request additional mitigation measures be imposed by ERC PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Appellant's written request for a hearing and examining the available information on file,the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES: APPEAL The following minutes are a summary of the September 1, 1998 appeal hearing. The official record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, September 1, 1998,at 9:05 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record for the appeal: • Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the appeal, Exhibit No.2: Aerial photograph(appellant) proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to the appeal. Exhibit No.3: Aerial photograph with concentric Exhibit No.4: Overlay of old and new site plans circles Exhibit No. 5: Cross-section Exhibit No.6: 1986 Master Plan Exhibit No.7: Memorandum of Agreement Exhibit No.8: 1998 Master Plan Exhibit No.9: Heron colony nest locations Exhibit No. 10: Aerial photograph dated 9/97 Exhibit No. 11: Island diagram Exhibit No. 12: Tree location map • Exhibit No. 13: Dr.Raedeke Resume Exhibit No. 14: Great Blue Heron Assessment Exhibit No. 15: Carlson&McLean 1996 Study Exhibit No. 16: Colony life graph Exhibit No. 17: Five pages of photographs Exhibit No. 18: Photo of nests AIL • Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H _ October 19, 1998 Page 2 Parties present: Representing Friends of the Black River Jerry Holmes 408 Index Place NE • Renton, WA 98055 Representing City of Renton Larry Warren 1055 S Grady Way • Renton, WA 98055 Representing Black River Corporate Park Amy Kosterlitz 1011 Western Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1097 The Examiner explained that the appeal was an administrative appeal held pursuant to Ordinance 3071 and was • the only administrative review to occur on the matter. The matter may be submitted back to the Examiner for reconsideration if the parties are not satisfied with the decision. He stated that the appellant had the burden of demonstrating that the City's action was erroneous, and would have to show clear and convincing evidence that _ - the City's determination was incorrect. At that point the City could respond, if they chose to do so. Jennifer Henning,Project Manager,Development Services Division,City of Renton, 1055 S.Grady Way, Renton,Washington 98055, stated that the site is located in the Green River Valley portion of the City of Renton on an undeveloped 12.5 acre parcel. The site is surrounded by the King County Metro Regional Wastewater Treatment facility on the southwest,office buildings on the east,and permanent open space of approximately 120 acres to the north and northwest of the site. A portion of the open space consists of the City's flood control project. The proposal is for the development of five one and two-story structures totaling 148,834 square feet.There is a.07 acre Category 3 wetland located on the southeast portion of the site which would be filled in. Other wetland areas on site would be preserved. There is a heron rookery located on an • island in the P-1 basin and in the riparian forest to the north of the site in the City's open space. Access would be from Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 7th Street, using existing curb cuts. Surface parking of approximately 600 stalls is provided. The buildings would be tilt-up concrete structures of 20 to 30 feet in height. There would be no drilling for their construction. Non-glare glass or tinted glass would be used.The lighting proposed on the site would be focused and directed to prevent spill-over onto adjacent sites. Minimum separation between the nearest building and the heron rookery is at least 540 feet. There is a wetpond being constructed for water quality purposes which would be within 500 feet of the heron rookery. A total of 31 trees would be cleared from the site. Split-rail fencing will be installed along the east boundary to define the wetland buffer edge. Chain link fencing will be installed along the wetpond area on the north portion of the site to prevent human intrusion. Extensive landscaping is also proposed. About 70 percent of the developed area and 58 percent of the total site would be covered with impervious surface. . Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 3 The ERC did not impose any additional setbacks or limit site construction to specific times of the year because the heron rookery is large and thriving. The land uses in the surrounding area include quarry blasting,concrete recycling,regional waste treatment plant,building construction,a railroad,vehicle traffic, and recreational trail. Several previous environmental studies and mitigation measures were included in this project. Because of this, few mitigation measure were placed on the project. The tract for this project had a previous site plan approved by the Hearing Examiner in January 1992. A Memorandum of Agreement(MOA)was approved by the City of Renton,citizen and environmental groups, and the owner. The previously approved plan also included an adjacent tract which has since been purchased • by the City of Renton as permanent open space. Discussion was held among the parties regarding the applicability of the prior Memorandum of Agreement. The Hearing Examiner concluded that he did not have the jurisdiction to determine its applicability and that the only thing under review at this time is the current site plan. The new site plan recognizes physical changes in the site over the last seven years and includes the maturing of trees that were planted earlier. The trees now range in height from 72 feet to 126 feet. Jerry Holmes spoke on behalf of appellants. He explained activities of appellants such as flora and fauna • surveys,removal of non-invasive plant species, planting of native plants, installation of bird houses and conducting field trips. This heron colony is the largest in King County and several hundred people a year view its activities. There is great concern over the impact of this proposal on the colony. He cited portions of the _ City's environmental ordinance relating to responsibility of the City. Appellants believe ERC should have required two additional mitigation measures for this project. First,to extend the buffer from the heron colony to the development from 500 feet to 660 feet. The buffer should be measured from the nearest nest,not the center of the island. Second,that applicant should limit the time for all heavy construction on the entire project from June 15 to January 15. This limitation is necessary in order to protect the colony from serious disturbance during the heron breeding season. He cited other projects in King County which were placed under construction time limits in order to protect bird species. The State of Washington places similar restrictions on developments near bald eagle nests. Mr.Holmes reviewed the environmental check list,visual assessment of the heron colony,the tree height screening report and the ERC staff report,and cited what appellants felt were flaws in those documents. Donald Norman,2112 NW 199th, Shoreline,Washington 98177,stated his credentials as a wildlife biologist. • He first visited the subject site in 1988 and as recently as yesterday. He confirmed mitigation measures appellant is requesting, and stated it is standard practice to enforce timing restrictions. Indications are that herons arrive at the site as early as late December and the early January restriction is warranted. There are still herons just barely ready to fledge on the nest now,but the majority are out of the colony by the end of July. The issue of disturbance which is underlying the distance from the colony has been brought up in many other instances of development. Dr.Norman disagreed with the information presented by the ERC regarding items such as visual flight patterns of the herons,the visual barrier in March from the site to the heron colony, majority of nesting from the island rather than in the riparian forest. He explained the relationship of existing development and when herons move into an area,as opposed to when there is an existing colony and development then comes in. c Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 4 He further responded that this colony is flourishing and appears to have been able to withstand large amounts of bald eagle predation which is devastating other colonies in the region. Because of that this colony may have larger regional significance than the other colonies in the area. In 1991 the colony was abandoned because of bald eagle predation but has since come back. People shooting herons and trees being harvested nearby have caused other colonies to be abandoned. Some species of trees are more susceptible to degradation over time by the herons and loss of trees may cause abandonment also. He also stated that the additional tree height from the early 1990's is not a significant factor as trees are expected to grow. The longevity of the existing Lombardy poplars is unknown,but they will probably need to be trimmed or come down to protect buildings in wind storms as they are not native trees. Dee Boersma,311 S King Street, Seattle,Washington 98144,stated her credentials as a zoologist and ornithologist. Her main concern in this proceeding is conservation biology. Habitat is being lost as the last of the undeveloped land is being developed, particularly in urban areas. The studies that were done 5 to 7 years ago may not be relevant,and this particular area has actually become richer during that time and more important because of the losses. She stated that scientists cannot tell exactly how close one can go without losing the rookery. If the developers are convinced that there will be no harm to this colony, she suggested they bear the cost of restoring it,not the public. Kate Stenberg,King County Wildlife Program, 810 Third Avenue,#350, Seattle,Washington 98104, stated her credentials in wildlife management and land use planning. She explained that the herons are an interjurisdictional issue because although these herons live in Renton,they feed in habitats in King County and are enjoyed by King County residents. There are several large heronries which have disappeared in recent _ - years and no corresponding increase in the existing rookeries. She discussed a Kenmore rookery regarding development limits and its nearby fire station,police station and park&ride lot noises. She stated that the herons moved in with the developments already in place,as opposed to development after a rookery is established. Seasonal construction limits are a standard practice in King County and they are in place mainly for noise disturbance. A City of Renton Comprehensive Plan policy states that the City shall identify unique and significant wildlife habitat as defined by Washington State Habitat& Species Project and ensure that buildings, roads and other features are located on less sensitive portions of the site. This policy refers to the priority species listing that the State of Washington has put together and the great blue heron is listed as a priority species. Robert Butler, 824 Ladimer Street,New Westminster,British Columbia B3L4W4,stated his credentials as a biologist and ornithologist. He explained that the great blue heron resides here in Puget Sound and western Washington and along the coast to the southern coast of Alaska,and it is estimated there are 9000 of this species. In Canada in 1997 this species was given federal jurisdiction as an endangered species, or a vulnerable species. It is based on the decline of the great blue heron in British Columbia, or an annual decline of 5%. Heron colonies have also disappeared in recent years. He cited instances where because of construction noises the colonies were abandoned. He further stated it is important to move the construction time level in order to minimize the uncertainty on the abandonment of the colony. Ted Mallory, 7524 S. 135th, Seattle,Washington,98178,stated that he is located one mile north of the rookery and has a spotting scope in the window where he has watched herons on a daily basis for the past 10 years. He _ felt that construction timing should really not be a significant impact on developer as he has from July to Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H _ October 19, 1998 Page 5 January for six years to construct, and that the developer could develop the buildings farthest away first,with the closest buildings being built during the restricted construction time. Chris Peterson, 8050 35th Avenue NE, Seattle,Washington 98115,director of Seattle Audubon Society,cited a large store in north Seattle which recently had been abandoned and which had been a lively area of woods and wetlands. Now there is only a small, neglected wetland with a large empty store and parking lot. Questioned if that could happen at Black River Corporate Park, and that the land and the species it supports would end up paying the cost. The health of the land and the welfare of future generations of humans and animals who will live here should be considered. Helen Ross, 8050 35th Avenue NE, Seattle, Washington 98115,conservation coordinator for Seattle Audubon Society,was an original signer of MOA and it is their position that the terms of the MOA are still in effect even though the Hearing Examiner will not be ruling on the MOA as it relates to this application. She stated that setback distances and construction seasons still must be applied to this project. Ed Newbold,4972 17th Avenue S, Seattle, Washington 98108,stated that as a wildlife artist he receives many requests for herons in the landscape because it is such a signature bird in the northwest. He stated it makes sense to measure the distance from the closest nesting tree to the construction site. Larry Warren, appearing on behalf of the City of Renton,gave a history of the City's participation in the earlier MOA and the City's interest in this area. He stated that SEPA is only one area of policy that the City has to consider. Development,tax and other policies must be balanced with SEPA. Based on all information given to _ it,the ERC then makes a determination. Further consideration must be given to the law as respects SEPA and what mitigation conditions can be imposed by the City. Amy Kosterlitz,attorney for applicant herein, stated that the applicant believes it has gone more than half way and more than City policies require in contributing open space and riparian habitat for the heron. Applicant believes that the best available science for protection of the heron rookery will demonstrate that the ERC's decision was correct. Also, ERC did not err in its decision based on the City's CP which has designated this area as an employment area. Applicant has also followed the policy that says"encourage the preservation and enlargement of existing habitat areas through development incentives". Royce Berg,LPN Architects, 1535 Fourth Avenue S, Suite D, Seattle,Washington 98134, applicant representative herein, described the site plan as proposed and compared it to earlier site plan to show changes in growth of vegetation and down-sizing of original project. Explained the timing and construction techniques required for the construction phases. Theresa Hanson, P.O. Box 7208,Tacoma, Washington 98407,testified on behalf of the applicant. As the natural resource ecologist for this project, she visited the site in early spring to look at screening between the rookery and the development site. In 1986 applicant planted hundreds of poplars and conifer trees. In addition there are naturally growing alder and black cottonwood trees on the site. Her review was completed in March 1998 and was prior to trees leafing out so that herons were present and visible during nesting season. Stated . that only visual corridor to the herons as you walk across site or along the existing sidewalk on southwestern boundary of site is a 30 foot gap in the trees. Returned to site in July and trees are no longer visible on • u ' Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 6 sidewalk or along visual corridor near.building B because of tree growth. There will be additional trees planted in the wetpond areas for further visual buffering. Ken Raedeke, 5711 NE 63rd, Seattle,Washington 98115,testified on behalf of the applicant. He listed his credentials as a wildlife biologist. He described the regulatory status regarding great blue heron,stating that it is a protected non-game species in Washington and is also a priority habitat species under a criteria during its vulnerable breeding time. It is protected from hunting and any other forms of direct harm and it is illegal to knowingly destroy an active heron nest. Washington Department of Fish&Wildlife has no authority to regulate it in other than the specific protection of the animal. He described current status of heron in the Puget Sound region and in Canada. He stated that U.S.Fish&Wildlife Service recently reported that the number of • confirmed nest sites for the great blue heron was 21 and two probable colonies and 63 additional probable colonies in King County. Much speculation as to why this number is increasing. Cited studies that it is not the width of the buffer as much as the conditions such as vegetative screening, and that the herons can habituate to disturbance and do well next to developments. Concluded that the 500 foot buffer was more than adequate,based on data presented. It is substantially the same that was previously agreed to and approved by the Department of Wildlife. The buffer is essentially what is there now and the colony is highly habituated to human disturbance. Regarding the construction time restriction, it has been observed that when an adequate buffer is provided,that limitation on construction time is not needed. Trudy Thomas. 2350 Eaglemont Road,Port Townsend,Washington 98368, one of the appellants herein, questioned Dr.Raedeke regarding the nest locations of this particular rookery and his monitoring of such. On cross-examination by Mr.Malphrus,Dr.Raedeke responded regarding the number of abandoned nests in Puget Sound and some of the reasons given for the abandonment. Suzanne Krom,4715-1/2 36th Avenue SW,Seattle, Washington 98126, a representative for Citizens for Renton Wildlife's Preservation, stated it is their position that the MOA still applies to this project. They further support the protections for the heron colony as previously testified to,specifically to impose the construction season limit from January 15 to July 31,and the buffer at 660 feet or as recommended by the experts. Ms. Krom further stated that she has been monitoring this colony closely for nine years and introduced a photograph taken of the main colony in March 1998 showing the density of nests. From her observation over the years,she believes 90 to 95 percent of the herons nest on the island,not in the riparian forest. Bruce Harpham,2518 S 361st Street, Federal Way,Washington 98003, president of Rainier Audubon Society, stated that he is not a scientist, but a citizen activist concerned with future generations. He was frustrated that the City and applicant were joined together and that citizens were the adversaries. Also pointed out that the money spent on protecting these sites was not only from the City of Renton, but also from King County residents,making this a regional issue. Dr. Butler reiterated appellants' position that the new noises from the construction should be phased such that it has little or no impact on the colony. The size and possible significance of the colony warrants timing and buffer constraints. t Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 7 The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this appeal. There was no one else wishing to speak. Closing arguments were to be presented to the Examiner in written form by all parties. The hearing closed at 5:05 p.m. MINUTES: SITE PLAN The following minutes are a summary of the September 29,1998 site plan hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday, September 29, 1998,at 10:00 a.m.in the Council Chambers on the seventh floor of the Renton City Hall. The following exhibits were entered into the record for the site plan: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: Neighborhood detail map application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Site plan Exhibit No.4: Landscape plan Exhibit No. 5: Zoning map Exhibit No.6: Elevation Drawing-Building A Exhibit No.7: Elevation Drawing-Buildings B&C Exhibit No.8: Elevation Drawing-Building D Exhibit No.9: Elevation Drawing- Building E The hearing opened with a presentation of the staff report by JENNIFER HENNING,Project Manager, Development Services, City of Renton, 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,Washington 98055. The project site is located in the Green River Valley portion of the City on a currently undeveloped 12.5 acre site which is comprised of three parcels,Lots 1,2 and 3 of the former Tract B of the Black River Corporate Park. Surrounding the site is the King County Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant on the southwest,office buildings on the east, open space to the north, a portion of which is the P-1 detention pond for flood control. The site is zoned Commercial Office(CO)and is designated Employment Area Valley in the Comprehensive Plan(CP). The site is bounded by Oakesdale Avenue SW, SW 7th Street and Naches Avenue. This proposal consists of five structures totaling 148,834 square feet constructed of tilt-up concrete panels with tinted glass. Three of the structures would be one story in height and two would be two stories. The ultimate use for these structures is intended to be commercial office,business service,research and development, assembly and related activities as allowed in the zone. Access to the.site is from Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 7th Street. There are existing curb cuts from both streets. Perimeter surface parking is proposed for 597 . vehicles. There are adequate public services and utilities to serve this site. . Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.:LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H _ October 19, 1998 Page 8 The construction is scheduled to occur in three phases over a six-year period. The applicant is requesting a two year extension of the six-year phasing plan if they can show substantial progress and can show good cause. In the first two-year period a minimum of one building would be constructed. The second phase includes commencement of 3 of the 5 buildings. Phase three includes the six year period and all the buildings could be built. • There is a 0.07 acre Category III wetland on the southeast portion which would be filled under the-proposal. There are two Category II wetlands adjacent to the site which require buffering setbacks and fencing. There is a heron rookery located to the north/northwest of the site in the P-1 basin and riparian forest in the City of Renton open space. The northwest facade of designated Building C would be located approximately 540 feet from the nearest tree in the heron rookery. Building B in the north central portion of the site would be located approximately 605 feet, and the north corner of Building A would be located approximately 740 feet from the nearest tree in the rookery. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC)issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. There were many mitigation measures inherent in the project. There has been much public comment on this project as well as a SEPA appeal filed and heard previously. A mitigation measure required by the ERC was lighting in the parking area is to be focused and directed to prevent glare or spill-over light impacts to the off-site wetlands and heronry. This proposal meets the Employment Area Valley CP policies pertaining to public access to public areas and shorelines. There will be physical restrictions to the wetlands through split rail and chain link fencing, plantings and a wetpond system. Approximately 16 percent of this site would remain undeveloped and would be natural area habitat buffer. This proposal is compatible with the CP and zoning policies regarding office park development in this area. It meets the code setback requirements,as well as those for height and lot coverage, landscaping and pedestrian connections. The proposed 597 parking stalls is within the range required. Joint use parking is also achieved in this proposal. About 70 percent of the developable area of the site and 58 percent of the overall site would be covered with impervious surface. Staff recommends that the applicant be required to establish a native growth protection easement at the north corner of the site. This would extend from the north edge of the wetpond north to the property corner and would include the habitat buffer area. Staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to two conditions: (1)comply with ERC mitigation measures for fire mitigation fee and site lighting; and(2)establish a native growth protection easement extending from the north edge of the wetpond,north to and including the habitat buffer area. The only • disturbance to be allowed in this area would be deposit of dead and downed material from other portions of the site to enhance the wildlife habitat,or any routine maintenance that is needed to access the wetpond. Amy Kosterlitz, Suite 902,Waterfront Place, 1011 Western Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98144,applicant attorney herein, expressed her concern that this hearing be limited only to the site plan and not ground already covered by the SEPA appeal hearing. She further stated that it is the applicant's intention, if this site plan is approved as proposed,to go with the current site plan approval rather than a prior site plan approval. Royce Berg, LPN Architects, 1535 4th Avenue S,#D, Seattle,Washington 98134,applicant architect,stated that CC&R's were recorded with the short plat for mutual access,egress,utility easements and maintenance of • Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.:LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H _ October 19, 1998 Page 9 the wetpond area. The buildings have been located on a fill area which came out of the excavated P-1 channel. All perimeter trees on the site will be left,with only those in the center being removed. The phasing of the buildings relates to marketability and at this point it is not possible to know when and which buildings will be first. The construction schedule is also difficult to anticipate,with the possibility that it may take from 10 to 12 months for total construction time. He further stated that they are proposing to take the outfall for the wetpond to the north because it goes into a drainage swale that runs east and west and ties up to other adjacent properties. Harold Hagenson, 2009 Minor Avenue East, Seattle, Washington 98102,civil engineer for applicant herein, described the wetpond and the overall drainage plan. The volume of the wetpond itself is about two and a half times as large as required under the current drainage code. The wetpond will have generally about 3 to 5 feet of standing water in it throughout the year. The concept is that as water from the first flush storms,which typically carry the greatest loads of pollution,pass into the wetpond,the large volume of water acts as a settling pond so that the sediments and pollution generally will fall out in the bottom of the pond. There are also some very natural aquatic flora which will be planted around the perimeter of the pond which will reduce some of the other heavy metals that will be generated from the parking lot area. The discharge from the pond will be directly to the P-1 channel via a facility to the north. Detention is provided by means of compensation off-site. Lauchlin Bethune, 19428 66th Avenue S,#Q-106,Kent,Washington 98032, landscape architect for applicant herein, described the types of landscaping for the site. Ornamental landscape around the buildings will be done in traditional methods with irrigation and soil and maintained in traditional methods. Existing street trees along Oakesdale and 7th will be maintained. The remainder of the site perimeter will be environmentally constructed to include no mulches,no fertilizers and no pesticides, and thus no maintenance practices. Inside this perimeter there is about a 10 foot landscape buffer which will be densely planted with conifers,deciduous trees and thorny shrubs and trees. Around the wetpond there will be a cyclone fence to eliminate pedestrian traffic. The wetpond will be planted with native vegetation. Further dense landscaping will be placed along the back northern part of the site to screen the rookery. The existing habitat debris piles that were left from the original land clearing will also remain. There was discussion regarding efforts to prevent fertilizers,pesticides and herbicides from entering the wetpond. It was generally agreed that there is no practical technology to remove pesticides and herbicides from the stream. Kate Stenberg, King County Wildlife Program, 810 Third Avenue,#350, Seattle, Washington 98104, stated that she supported the lower building heights,as well as the additional conifers to be planted. Regarding the shielded lighting, she suggested that the building lighting be included as well as the parking lots. She further stated that the fencing should be extended along the north,west and east sides of the site. The planned picnic areas should also be fenced to prevent people from extending into the open space and habitat areas. She also recommended that native plants be used as much as possible throughout the site. Estella Leopold. 5608 17th Avenue NE,Seattle, Washington 98105, gave her credentials as a botanist. She stated her concern that the buffer between Building C and Wetland 1 as planned at 30 feet is not sufficient and. is not permitted by the Forest Practices Act. With this development there will be maintenance of formal landscapes with pesticides,herbicides and fertilizers, and the 30 foot buffer will not be sufficient to protect the wetland from pollution. She also pointed out that in the urban area of Greater Seattle this is the largest grove f • Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 10 of mature cottonwoods remaining. Big groves are needed because of the possible destruction by herons over the long term.. (The preceding testimony by Ms.Leopold was given at the 9/1/98 appeal hearing,but was intended for the site plan portion of the proceedings.) The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:20 a.m. SEPA APPEAL FINDINGS.CONCLUSIONS&DECISION 1. The appellant,Friends of Black River,represented by Tom Malphrus, filed an appeal of a • Determination of Non-Significance(DNS-M) issued for a proposed development located at the northwest corner of the City adjacent to a heron rookery. The DNS-M was issued for a Site Plan,the City's public review process for projects of a certain size. Friends of Black River(hereinafter appellant) is a group of individuals interested in preserving the riparian forest and its breeding,resident heron colony located on City-owned property north or northwest of the subject site. 2. The appeal was filed in a timely manner on July 6, 1998. The subject proposal was subjected to the City's ordinary SEPA review process. The City has a three-person body,the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)which serves as its "responsible official" for making environmental determinations. The City, in the course of and as a result of its SEPA review, issued its original Determination of • Significance-Mitigated for the project on June 16, 1998. During the review process the City determined that certain conditions should be imposed as mitigation. Those conditions are not at issue. Instead the appellants have challenged the DNS-M alleging that additional conditions are required to preserve the heron rookery adjacent to the subject site. 3. The hearing was originally scheduled for July 14, 1998 but the underlying applicant asked for additional time to respond to the appeal issues and assemble witnesses. 4. The underlying proposal,the Site Plan Approval Permit,would allow phased development of the applicant's site with five(5)buildings. The phases were not defined other than suggesting a certain number of buildings would be erected over the next eight years,but the order of construction remains undetermined. 5. The subject site is approximately 12.53 acres in area. The site is a generally level, irregularly shaped parcel. The applicant proposes erecting five buildings. Three buildings will be one story while the other two buildings would be two stories. There will be surface parking around the buildings for 597 parking stalls. 6. A wetpond system will be installed at the northwest corner of the site. It will be maintained only infrequently. The wetpond will be bound on the north or northwest by habitat buffer area. This buffer area will also continue around the north side of the site. Natural and planted vegetation is located along the western and northwest margin of the site. Some of these trees were planted in the last several years to screen the subject site from the heron rookery. These trees are predominantly deciduous trees and predominantly located on the western boundary of the site. The"line of trees" as it is identified in many contexts is a row of Lombardy poplars located along the westernmost boundary of the property. Conifers are located slightly east of it. • Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H • October 19, 1998 Page 11 7. The appellants are most concerned with the heron rookery which is located generally north of the subject site. The heron rookery is mainly concentrated in trees located north of Proposed Building B,a building located in the center of the western portion of the subject site. It appears that the heron have concentrated nest building in a few of the trees located on an island in what is commonly called the P-1 forebay pond. Other nests are located off the island in a riparian forest that arcs around the north side of the island stretching east to west. Most of the heron are concentrated on the island and in trees directly north of the island. 8. The appeal raises two issues. It states: "We believe the ERC in issuing its Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated • should have required the following additional mitigation measures: The applicant shall revise their site plan to show an increase in the setback distance from the Black River Great Blue Heron Colony to the development from 500 feet to 660 feet. The setback is necessary in order to decrease the risk of abandonment of the heron colony. Nexus: City of Renton Environmental Ordinance(Code Section 4-6). The applicant shall limit all heavy construction on the project to a period from June 15 to January 15. The limitation is necessary in order to,protect the heron colony from serious disturbance during the heron-breeding season. Nexus: City of Renton Environmental Ordinance(Code Section 4-6). 9. The appeal goes on: "The ERC addresses these measures in their staff report and determines that these mitigation measures are not necessary to protect the Black River Heron Colony. However,the ERC provides no scientific evidence to support their claim. We will provide expert testimony in support of these mitigation measures." 10. It would appear that the ERC based their decision on the existing vegetative screening and not any conclusive scientific evidence that they had before them. "In addition,vegetative screening that has been planted in the last several years has matured and creates a barrier between the location of the 20-to 30-foot high proposed • buildings, preventing spill-over light from penetrating the rookery." "The heron rookery is surrounded by a second growth deciduous forest,and is separated from the site by a drainage channel,and dense tree cover including cottonwood, alder trees,and a row of Lombardy poplar(Populas nigra)trees. A Tree Height and Screening Report prepared by Natural Resource Consulting(March 1998) is provided as part of the project application. According to the report, sight lines from the proposed buildings to the heron rookery would be limited, and the rookery would be visible only from Building B,through a 30-foot wide 'gap' created by shorter trees. Proposed Building B would be two-stories in height(approximately 28 feet tall)and would be located directly in line and south of the heron rookery. The proposed structure would block views to the rookery from all of the other proposed buildings on Black River Corporate Park • Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 12 the site. Available views to the heron rookery from Building B are expected to be reduced each year over the next six years,as the shorter alder and cottonwood trees increase in height,and block the gap." "Establishing time periods for the use of heavy equipment for the entire site for outside of the time period from January 15th through June 30th is not supported. The MOA applying to the previous approved project established a specific construction zone (within a 700 foot radius of the heron rookery)and time period(January 15th through June 15th). Since the time the MOA was approved by all parties,site conditions have changed, substantial vegetation has been planted and has matured. This vegetation provides a significant visual and physical barrier benefiting the heronry. Vegetation • provides for noise deflection and absorption. In addition,the ambient noise in the area of the project site includes industrial operations(Metro Treatment Plant),concrete recycling,truck and vehicular traffic,quarrying,railroad operation,construction of • warehouses,bridges and road improvements. Additional noise impacts from construction of the proposal would be short-term in nature, and would not require mitigation. Only the construction of about one-half of the area of the wetponds and a small area(less than 500 square feet)of the circulation drive on the north side of Building C would occur within the 500-foot radius of the heronry. Existing and proposed natural vegetative buffers,dead and downed material(stumps,etc.), ornamental landscaping,and wetponds would preclude human intrusion into the heronry. No further mitigation would be required." 11. The City owns approximately 100 acres of open space north,east and west of the subject site. It acquired portions of the property by dedication from the applicant as well as by purchasing tracts from the applicant. Its most recent acquisition is of some wetland acreage north and east of the subject site. The applicant and City allege that this acreage was sold below cost but no evidence was submitted supporting this. The City suggests that the transfers should be considered as part of past mitigation. Some transfers did offset storm drainage detention requirements. 12. The heronry appears to have between 50 to 70 nesting pairs. It is considered the largest heronry in King County. • 13. The heron engage in a behavior pattern that begins around the middle of January and ends the middle of July. This behavior includes courtship,mating,nest building,egg laying,hatching and fledging of the young. Time periods vary from year to year with the birds arriving earlier some years and fledging later in others. This year fledging was apparently still occurring in August. 14. The applicant proposes using auger cast pile installation to reduce the noise that might be associated with construction. The tilt-up construction is also relatively quiet. The construction period includes 3- month preload and surcharge to settle the soils for foundation work,then 7 to 9 months for construction. 15. Buildings range from approximately 540 feet from the rookery to about 900 feet. The wetpond,the closest of the man-made features and construction alterations,would be just under 500 feet. 16. Approximately 31 trees would be cleared. Some woody construction debris would be placed north of ' the wetpond for habitat enhancement. Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.:LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 13 17. Some of the activities that occur or have occurred in the area are blasting at a quarry northwest of the heronry,the Metro plant expansion,concrete recycling center northwest of the site,the construction of Naches Avenue,the operation of the railroad and the bird watchers visiting the trail. Most, if not all,of these sources are more than 1,000 feet from the heronry. 18. Both the appellants and the City with the applicant presented expert witnesses. The nature of the presentations differed but both sides demonstrated points that favored their respective positions. Heron flushed. Heron did not flush. Nests were abandoned,nests were not abandoned. Habitual loud noises don't necessarily affect the birds. Noises that are out of the normal course of events affect the birds. The birds abandon eggs. The birds don't abandon nests further into the nesting season. The studies relied on by both parties show flushing varied in different studies. Different events did or did not cause flushing. Some nest sites have been abandoned. It appears that conclusions for the reasons for such abandonment fall on both natural abandonment and some form of adverse external force. The applicant's expert draws some conclusions about causes or casts doubt on supposed causes but there is . no evidence of what did or did not cause some abandonment other than his stated theories. 19. The issue of whether the heron eventually or naturally destroy their nesting tree or trees and how soon it may occur is not relevant at this time. 20. A review of the number of heron colonies in King County which shows them increasing demonstrates the absolute change is small,although the number of heron might be increasing..The number of colonies increased in the last 10 years from approximately 7 colonies to 10 colonies,a change of 3. 21. The heron are classified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife as a"priority species" due - to their"vulnerable aggregations." This means that since they tend to nest together,any danger to a colony could mean a loss of a number of birds rather than just a nesting pair. 22. A review of the record bears out the fact that the ERC did not have evidence of the nature provided at the appeal hearing. The ERC had the applicant's application which included the Environmental Checklist, a Visual Assessment Heron Rookery(flight pattern study)and a Tree Height Screening Report(tree height study). Neither addresses any of the issues of heron sensitivity to disturbance. No particular.evidence regarding heron behavior was submitted which supports the ERC's decision. The tree study"indirectly deals with visual intrusions. 23. As noted,most of the evidence submitted at the hearing was not available when the ERC held its review. 24. The conclusions drawn that colonies successfully nested even after flushing don't demonstrate how they would react to repeated exposure to intrusions that caused flushing. It merely shows that flushing occurred,the distances it occurred. It does not say if flushing behaviors or noises continued,say for an entire construction season,day after day,that nesting would not be affected. • 25. The scientists or experts most directly involved in heron studies and behavior appear to reach different conclusions than the applicant's expert who only peripherally studies bird or heron behaviors. His review was more of an analysis of past studies and making an assessment based on re-reading those studies and doing a risk assessment on the chance for the colony thriving. There is no way to tell if the literature review was thorough,but some reports of heron behavior were apparently omitted. In any event,as noted the science is still in its infancy and disparate conclusions are certainly possible. • Black River Corporate Park • Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 14 26. The following is an excerpt from the "Limitations"section of the applicant's expert's report: "The determination of ecological system classifications,functions,values,and boundaries is an inexact science,and different individuals and agencies may reach different conclusions. We cannot guarantee the outcome of such agency determinations. Therefore,conclusions of this report should be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies prior to any detailed site planning or construction activities." 27. There is a heron rookery in the vicinity of the Whidbey Island Naval Station where the heron apparently are not affected by the jet planes,but do flush when humans are moving or visible. The • record does not establish if the herons adopted the site after the jet noises were established. 28. King County observes a window until July 31 for certain activities around the Kenmore heron rookery. 29. Construction windows are employed around eagle and redtail hawk nests and recently near an osprey nest. Similar construction windows are observed routinely for salmon spawning waters. 30. The ERC failed to note that heron are an indicator species and that the State has suggested guidelines including buffer distances and construction windows. 31. The one-day flight study conducted in 1997 is not representative of daily activity at the site but states that heron don't fly over Tract B. Other witnesses report the heron do fly over the tract. 32. Cottonwoods do not leaf out until early April and therefore do not provide a visual screen during the earlier phases of nesting. In March the heron were visible from the site even through the trees. The flight pattern is not necessarily relevant to their nesting or disturbance. Most of the nests are on the island and not well screened in the further removed riparian woods. A thin row of trees and those with no leaves provide little noise insulation. 33. The poplars at the southern end of the western property line vary between 72 and 81 feet tall. They are between 78 and 90 feet in the central western section and about 80 feet in the northern portion of the western section. Conifers exist east of these trees but they begin after a gap. There is a 30 foot gap in the tree buffer that provides a line of sight view from the island trees to the northwest corner of Building B and the southeast corner of Building A. Building B would block Building A if it were constructed first. This "tree height report"notes that trees are dynamic and both grow and fall. 34. The heron have been observed flushing or moving away when large groups of people are out on the trail observing them. The trail is over 500 feet away. The heron will establish their own "personal space" and flush if it appears violated. In some situations heron will set up a colony in an urban area in which disturbances already exist. They can become habituated to the existing"urban"noises and conditions. Because in the past this colony has not been pushed by close-in urban factors,their acclimatization during January through July is speculative. No one can assess their behavior with surety. It appears that reactions may be more a factor of the change in types of noise disturbances- new or novel noises to which they have not been accustomed which might cause the flushing behavior (bulldozers, etc.). 35. Some studies have shown that heron may not always abandon a colony site but their reproductive productivity has declined. • • • Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H - October 19, 1998 Page 15 36. Unlike applicant's expert,most of the other experts admitted no one knows how close activity could occur or what windows are necessary and what the reaction of the heron would be. This seems more realistic an assessment than a conclusion(based on risk assessment)that there is a 100%chance of the heronry thriving if there is a 450 foot buffer: CONCLUSIONS: 1. The decision of the governmental agency acting as the responsible official is entitled to substantial weight. Therefore,the determination of the ERC,the City's responsible official, is entitled to be maintained unless the appellant clearly demonstrates that the determination was in error. 2. The Determination of Significance in this case is entitled to substantial weight and will not be reversed or modified unless it can be found that the decision is"clearly erroneous." (Hayden v.Port Townsend, 93 Wn 2nd 870, 880; 1980). The court in citing Norway Hill Preservation and Protection Association v.King County Council, 87 Wn 2d 267,274; 1976,stated: "A finding is'clearly erroneous'when although there is evidence to support it,the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." Therefore,the determination of the ERC will not be modified or reversed if it can meet the above test. For reasons enumerated below,the decision of the ERC is reversed. 3. The clearly erroneous test has generally been applied when an action results in a DNS since the test is less demanding on the appellant. The reason is that SEPA requires a thorough examination of the environmental consequences of an action. The courts have,therefore, made it easier to reverse a DNS. A second test,the "arbitrary and capricious"test is generally applied when a determination of significance(DS) is issued. In this second test an appellant would have to show that the decision clearly flies in the face of reason as a DS is more protective of the environment since it results in the preparation of a full disclosure document,an Environmental Impact Statement. 4. An action is determined to have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the environment if more than a moderate impact on the quality of the environment is a reasonable probability.(Norway,at 278). Since the Court spoke in Norway,WAC 197-11-794 has been adopted, it defines "significant" as follows: Significant. (1) "Significant" as used in SEPA means a reasonable likelihood of more than a moderate adverse impact on environmental quality. (2) Significance involves context and intensity. . .Intensity depends on the magnitude and duration of an impact. . .The severity of the impact should be weighed along with the likelihood.of its occurrence. An impact may be significant if its chance of occurrence is not great,but the resulting environmental impact would be severe if it occurred. 5. Also redefined since the Norway decision was the term "probable." Probable. "Probable"means likely or reasonably likely to occur, ...Probable is used to distinguish likely impacts from those that merely have a possibility of occurring,but are remote or speculative. (WAC 197-11-782) Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 16 6. It appears that the study of heron behavior is of relatively recent origin. A review of the record seems to demonstrate a certain lack of consistency on the part of the heron in their reaction to noises or disturbance at differing distances. But why should more be expected.They are birds,wildlife,and they don't necessarily react in ways which can be predicted. It is not as if one could sit down with them and discuss the proposed changes to their locale. One cannot suggest to them that unlike the eagle attacks, these changes in the nearby open space and fields and new noises and intrusions are not intended to be provocative or predatory. • 7. It appears that in drafting the original MOA,the parties attempted to use the best science in regards to protecting the heronry from impacts. It also appears that the MOA was an attempt by the parties to • reach a reasonable,balanced accord that would permit development while attempting with best guesses, to limit impacts to the heron. • 8. It is not clear that the science has changed since the drafting of the MOA as that there seems to be one differing interpretation. We are still dealing with flighty birds and no one is entirely certain what ruffles their feathers. It would appear that during certain stages such as courtship they may not put up with the types of disturbances associated with construction. 9. As for the guiding science to use,there are established guidelines that apparently are used by the county,the state and federal governments. It also appears to be the standard used internationally. It was arrived at after a variety of studies. It was now challenged at this hearing as based on either flawed or anecdotal studies. The science may be wrong,but one hearing in the City of Renton cannot set aside what it seems that a consensus of experts have suggested is best. In any event the science that was good enough to solidify a meeting of the minds the last time(in the Memorandum of Agreement)is the science that seems appropriate this time,too. 10. Pains were taken to demonstrate that the City was not only attempting to protect the heron by purchasing the acreage almost surrounding the subject site,but also the unique riparian ecosystem. The land and trees would also serve to shelter the heron in the future if the island trees or other pressures forced them northward. But it appears the main thrust,effort and expenditure was directed at preserving the heron. In order to not thwart those efforts,taking some additional precautions would not be unreasonable. 11. For the ERC to totally ignore both seasonable constraints and buffer zones shows that they did not fully consider their actions. While experts may have reached differing conclusions or recommendations at the public hearing,the ERC was not privy to these scientific discussions and differences when they made their decision. The ERC made it based on a vegetative screening which does not buffer sound very effectively and one currently comprised mainly of deciduous trees which are bare for a good portion of the mating and early nesting period. The ERC also looked at the less intense development pattern now proposed. Less intense development does not avoid the construction disturbances and the loss of vegetative cover over approximately 13 acres immediately in the vicinity of the rookery. The ERC even referenced the 1\1OA in declining to impose a construction window. The science in the MOA and record developed previously showed buffers and seasonal windows were appropriate. 12. The ERC decision was clearly erroneous given the record they had when they made their decision. State agencies,county agencies,federal and even Canadian agencies all appeared to have reasoned that both buffers and seasonal construction were not only appropriate science but necessary if the heron were to be protected in some measure. • Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H • October 19, 1998 • Page 17 13. After reviewing the record developed as a result of the appeal,one substantially more complete than existed during the ERC review,this office is left with a split decision. It would appear that while the buffers proposed may not be perfect(if perfection could even be defined in the face of uncertainty), they are or approach adequate. It appears that the current development does approximate the distances of the previously agreed to plan. 14. This office, however, is left with the firm conviction that not respecting a seasonal construction window is clearly erroneous. If anything,the appeal record reinforces the view that in order to best protect this public resource,the best guesses that science can make are to again observe the seasonal window. As noted a number of times,such windows are now a standard construction practice when • working in environmentally sensitive locales. Such windows are observed all of the time when working in and around salmon spawning creeks and rivers. Such windows are observed in areas where osprey and redtailed hawks and eagles are nesting. 15. Not only are there construction windows observed for eagles,hawks and salmon,but the City and the applicant's predecessor in interest observed a construction window for just this colony of heron when the original site plan was adopted. As a matter of fact,such a window will be observed if the current plan is rejected by either the City or the applicant and if the prior plan is still valid,as that earlier plan would be bound,presumably, by the MOA(see below). 16. There seems to be some emphasis on,the prior and even recent actions of the applicant to sell or dedicate land as possibly a measure of environmental mitigation. There is even passing reference that the City"agreed to give an unquantified credit for mitigation for a later development project." This. appears to miss the point-what is the impact of this development. If the selling of land or the dedication of land does not prevent environmental impacts, it is not necessarily appropriate mitigation. Any discussion of loss of development potential of land that was sold or dedicated appears irrelevant. The applicant sold land and realized a return and there is no evidence whether it gained, lost or came out neutral on such exchanges. The amount of land dedicated and purchased clearly is significant,but if the impacts of this current proposed development continue(such as noise of construction),then mitigation beyond the dedications are necessary. In arriving at the current proposal,additional lands generally at the northeast margin of the site were sold to the City. While again commendable,those lands are not really in a location to limit construction noises and visual disturbances to the rookery from most of the remaining site. The question again remains: what are the impacts of this proposal on the environment and did the ERC appropriately consider the impacts and impose appropriate mitigation. • 17. As much as possible,this review was to be focused on the current proposal. It seems that all of the parties want to hearken back to the prior proposal. The ERC clearly compared the earlier proposal in deciding that this one had substantially diminished impacts. The applicant's closing argument notes that again and notes their witness testified to the substantial reduction. The fact is that some of the impacts might be reduced,but construction noise will still occur,albeit on smaller buildings but those noises will still occur. 18. The vegetative screen relied on by the ERC is mostly deciduous,meaning bare branches during the beginning of the courtship,mating period and early nesting period. The record states "vegetation provides for noise deflection and absorption"without demonstrating that fact. Studies have shown that vegetation, unless incredibly dense,has very limited noise attenuating characteristics. Leaves will be off the trees and the screening is of limited affect during the critical months. • Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 18 • 19. This office has reviewed the evidence presented. It finds that the distances proposed appear reasonable, but that intrusions should be limited during the period when the birds would tend to react, during the nesting,courtship, hatching and fledging periods. 20. The applicant's closing argument notes that the appellants'witnesses did not"undercut"the City's decision and the testimony of the applicant's witnesses. That can just as easily be turned around. The applicant's witnesses did not truly present any new evidence that would undercut the appellant's witnesses. While the burden was on the appellants,they provided sufficient.evidence to meet that burden. The science was on their side. 21. The ERC's decision was clearly erroneous because they do nothing specific to protect the heron rookery. The steps are merely passive-accepting the existing screening and presuming or trusting completely in those measures. All of the literature shows the birds react in manners that humans so far cannot clearly pin down,but they do react to a variety of disturbances. Visual disturbances have flushed the birds. Construction activities appear to flush the birds. 22. The record shows that a variety of activities have occurred in the vicinity of the heronry,but since the construction of the pond itself,few such activities have been as close as those now proposed. Nor is there evidence when the heavier activities occurred;that is,did heavy construction and noises or visual activity occur during the critical periods in nesting and courtship. Might some of the heavy construction have occurred later in the dry season when much construction takes place to avoid the rainy and wet weather of the Pacific Northwest. The evidence showing activities close to other nesting areas also does not clearly disclose if the heron habituated to newer disturbances or arrived after some - or most of the disturbance had occurred. 23. The reviewing body should not substitute its judgment for that of the original body with expertise in the matter, unless the reviewing body has the firm conviction that a mistake has been made. As indicated, the ERC did not have sufficient information to rule out the use of a construction window. That was clearly erroneous. The decision is therefore subject to modification by the Hearing Examiner who retains the powers'of the underlying decision-maker. 24. What the appellants have shown is that the ERC took no particular actions to protect the herons from intrusive noises and unaccustomed activities. The ERC deferred to the existing,current conditions. There was nothing in the record they had before them that demonstrated such conditions would protect sensitive,easily disturbed heron. The prior MOA,a deliberately crafted agreement, shows the ERC, the City and the applicant knew heron were flighty. • 25. This office heard from a number of experts. One a heron expert,another who did a thorough literature review. One concludes conservative action,the other no additional action. A thorough review of the record shows that "no additional protections" underestimates almost completely the fact that most of the studies show the birds do react to intrusions although not necessarily or only intense intrusions. 26. But there is also no arguing with the narrow choices the heron appear to have made.They seem to prefer the island tree or trees. Again,maybe this can best be understood by admitting humans don't understand heron "thinking." Scientists can't predict their reactions nor direct them to move north into the forest. Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.:LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 , - - • Page 19 27. No one has defined why they have stayed in the few island trees predominantly. Do they prefer the water view? Do they prefer the open space to see approaching danger? Do they just prefer those hardy older trees? Are they attracted by a scent of their past nesting use? Do they prefer the more open tree canopy of the older trees? It appears science does not know those answers. Just because the habitat of the riparian forest has been preserved and younger, less damaged trees exist back there does not mean the heron will immediately retreat there. The ERC believed that the change in plans and less intense development and the existing vegetative buffer eliminated any need for additional measures to protect the heron. The record does not bear that out. 28. The applicant argues that they have done enough and anything more is unreasonable in light of the record. The applicant's arguments only go so far. In discussing the various Comprehensive Plan ' policies they state on Page 13,first paragraph, "The development incentive here is minor by comparison-to allow a minimal amount of development on the last available tract of land in the original Blackriver ownership." Development is not halted by this decision or the imposition of a construction window. By allowing development but timing it,the applicant and hopefully,the appellants,can both achieve the various environmental and development policies of the City. It is the imposition of reasonable conditions "which strikes a balance between the City's environmental protection and economic development policies"(Applicants'close at Page 13). 29. By using a seasonal window,the applicant minimizes the probable impact of scaring the heron and develops its site. The applicant has already proposed a rather lengthy phasing of their project over eight years. It is a project which is not overwhelmingly large and could be accomplished in a much faster time frame. The current proposal which may be constructed over eight years, in fact, actually follows a previously approved site plan by the applicant or predecessor in interest that has been lying fallow for approximately eight years. Will the proposed construction timing limitation unreasonably thwart the applicant's plans? Clearly,working around the nesting season will limit the applicant's unfettered ability to do anything at any time. The limitation on major outdoor construction and not internal construction activities is not unreasonable. The condition seems both reasonable and achievable. 30. The decision of the ERC is modified. There should be a condition which limits the construction to a period that minimizes interference with the heron mating and nesting cycle between January 15 and June 15. The MOA provides a good frame of reference and should be used as a model for the fleshing out of the construction window and what is permitted. 31. In addition, in order to introduce new disturbances into the area in an orderly manner and to help habituate the heron to the coming changes,the applicant should phase its project by constructing Buildings D and E at the beginning of the project. The wetpond and supporting facilities may be • coordinated with the early development. 32. This office understands that the applicant may have a valid site plan which might be more intense and less respectful toward the heronry,but it is a site plan that still includes the construction window and buffers as well as other environmental safeguards that were not raised by these appellants. (There is no determination by the City that the prior approved site plan is still viable.) If the applicant wishes to pursue that site plan,they appear to be constrained by the very time limits and distances they now object to. Clearly,the various parties agree that the older site plan is not better vis-a-vis the heronry, ' but conditions amicably agreed to by the parties,now objected to as inappropriate,would govern. Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 20 DECISION: The determination of the Environmental Review Committee is reversed and the following conditions imposed to mitigate the impacts of this development: 1. There shall be no outside heavy construction during the periods of January 15 through June 15,or the applicant can abide by conditions imposed which mirror_those found in the MOA regarding construction periods. 2. The applicant shall phase its project by constructing Buildings D and E at the beginning of the project. • The wetpond and supporting facilities may be coordinated with the early development. ,SITE PLAN FINDINGS.CONCLUSIONS &DECISION • Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,Black River Corporate Park,Tract B,filed a request for approval of a Site Plan approval for a 5-building complex to house commercial,office,service and research,development and assembly uses. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. An appeal of the DNS-M was filed by a group called Friends of Black River. That appeal was consolidated with the land use hearing for a combined hearing. The timing of the hearing was such that the appeal issues were heard on one day and the land use was heard about a month later at a second hearing. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. • 5. The subject site is located north of the junction of Oakesdale Avenue SW and SW 7th Street. The site is west of Naches Avenue SW and east of the P-1 channel. The site is southeast of the P-1 detention pond. • 6. The King County Sewage Treatment Plant(formerly Metro) is located southwest of the site across Oakesdale. A variety of office and industrial uses are located south and east of the site along the east side of Oakesdale and north and south of SW 7th Street. A City-owned open space preserve of approximately 100-plus acres is located north-northwest of the subject site and contains a remnant riparian forest and an active heron rookery. 7. The subject site as well as properties immediately west,south and east of the site are zoned CO (Commercial Office). Properties along Powell Avenue SW(east of the site)and east of Powell along SW 7th are zoned IM(Medium Industrial). The treatment plant is zoned P-1 (Public Use). City owned e , Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings. File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 21 property encompassing the P-1 pond forebay is zoned RC(P)(Resource Conservation-public ownership). 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of employment generating uses,but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The subject site was annexed to the City with a series of separate actions over a course of approximately 18 years. See Ordinances 1745, 1764,1928 and 4040. 10. The subject site is approximately 12.53 acres. The site is an irregularly,almost pentagon-shaped parcel. The site is generally level. The site is part of a recently short platted parcel that resulted in four lots. Lots 1,2 and 3 will be incorporated into the development. Lot 4 will be conveyed to the City. 11. The applicant proposes erecting five buildings. Three buildings will be one story or approximately 20 feet tall. Two buildings will be two stories or approximately 30 feet tall. There will be surface parking around the buildings. 12. Building A will be a one-story,rectangular building located in the west corner of the site. It will contain approximately 22,010 square feet and will have an approximate footprint of 100 by 240 feet. It will generally be oriented in an east-west axis. 13. Building B will be northeast of Building A and be aligned with it. It will also be a rectangular,two- story building with approximately 32,500 square feet. Its footprint will be approximately 90 feet wide by 185 feet long. Buildings A and B will be located on underlying Lot 1. They will also be oriented in an east-west fashion. 14. Building C will be near the northern corner of the pentagon-shaped parcel. It will be oriented at approximately 90 degrees from Buildings A and B. It will be rectangular,also. It will be two-stories tall. It will contain approximately 32,500 square feet and appears to have the same footprint and overall design as Building B. Building C will be located on Lot 3. 15. Building D is located along the south boundary of the site along Oakesdale. It is a one-story,L-shaped building. The open angle of the "L" is aimed at Oakesdale. The northwest wing of the "L" will be aligned with Building A. The other wing will be aligned with the next building, Building E. The building will be approximately 32,890 square feet. The building will be approximately 190 feet wide and 286 feet long. The building is located on Lot 2. 16. Building E is located along the eastern portion of the property. It is another L-shaped, one-story building. Its open angle will be oriented to the northeast. It is somewhat smaller than Building D, containing approximately 28,934 square feet. It will be approximately 190 feet wide by 240 feet long. Building E will be located on Lot 3 with Building C. 17. All buildings will be concrete tilt-up construction. The applicant proposes light neutral colors with accent trim and various relief details along the top of the facade,building corners and with some • articulations near the entries and corners. The windows will be tinted glass and non-reflective to avoid glare or impacts on the heron rookery and other native areas. The buildings will have flat roof lines. Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 22 18. The applicant proposes installing its wetpond system at the northwest corner of the site. It would be separated from the property line by a habitat buffer area. The system is designed to settle out particulates and take up any fertilizing or growth encouraging chemicals that wind up in the storm outfall. Trash enclosures would be located on both ends of the wetpond/buffer area. 19. Storm system water will be directed to the wetpond for water quality treatment. It is intended to treat water from possibly contaminated traffic surfaces and it can pick up fertilizers. The applicant proposes a system which will convey the treated water to the P-1 channel. The applicant received credit for dedicating land for the creation of the P-1 pond; The system cannot remove certain potentially harmful chemicals such as herbicides and pesticides which could enter the P-1 pond. 20. Parking will be located around the buildings on the interior of the site as well as along the perimeter of the site. In the vicinity of the wetpond/buffer area which is closest to the habitat area,parking will be located inward of the buffer area. The remaining parking will be located around each of the buildings and in a central location between Buildings A and B and Buildings D and E. Since each building will have landscaping along its respective facade,the parking will be set back from the buildings. 21. The proposal has two driveways. One driveway is located along SW 7th while the second is located along Oakesdale Avenue SW. Both driveways are located generally in the middle of the street frontage. Traffic circulation within the site will be handled by a perimeter roadway and interior circulation isles surrounding each building. Pedestrian paths will interconnect the buildings and connect to the public sidewalks. Since the subject site is three separate legal lots,cross easements for -- parking and circulation will be required. 22. The applicant,will be providing parking for 597 vehicles which falls within the code allotted range of between 447 and 670 stalls. The applicant will be providing the 30% compact stalls allowed which is 179 stalls. 23. The proposal will generate between approximately 1,200 and 1,800 vehicle trips per day depending on how the project is viewed. As part of a larger interlinked office park or complex with other phases, lesser traffic is anticipated. Similarly,peak hour traffic would vary from between approximately 250 morning and evening trips to approximately 170 trips for the interlinked scenario. The applicant or predecessor in interest has contributed to the funding of Oakesdale and the ERC did not impose any additional transportation mitigation. 24. :The site will be landscaped extensively. The wetpond is separated from the P-1 pond by a habitat buffer. Additional setbacks are observed along the north property line and the public open space. Staff has proposed creating a native growth protection easement for the north portion of Lot 1. The applicant will be providing the minimum 10 feet of landscaping along SW 7th and 15 feet instead of 10 feet along Oakesdale. Each of the buildings will be surrounded by perimeter landscaping. Courtyards will be prominent for the "L-shaped"buildings. Entries will also be defined by additional landscaping. Parking aisles will have landscaping. Landscaping and fencing will be used to keep people from straying into the heron buffer areas or into the wetland areas surrounding the site. The site will comply with the Soil Conservation Services'two-percent habitat landscaping. 25. The applicant will be filling a small, approximately 0.07 acre wetland located in the southeast corner Of the site. A permit from the Army Corps will be needed. This office is not concerned with conditions the Army Corps may or may not impose on this proposal. They have separate jurisdiction. Any conditions imposed as a result of this review by the City will be imposed under City authority. Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 23 26. The applicant proposed phasing the project as follows: Phase 1 is defined as the first two years of a six-year plan. During Phase 1 at least one building would be commenced. Phase 2 is defined as occurring during the first four years of the six-year plan. During Phase 2 at least three buildings would be commenced(possibly including the one.building from Phase 1). Phase 3 would be the entire six- year plan. During Phase 3 the five proposed buildings would commence(including the three buildings from Phases 1 and 2). Phases 2 and 3 would follow Phase 1 but could commence concurrently with the previous phases. 27. The proposal includes approximately 18,000 cubic yards of structural fill to be placed on the site. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The site plan ordinance provides a number of specific criteria for reviewing a site plan. Those criteria • are generally represented in part by the following enumeration: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; b. Conformance with the Building and Zoning Codes; c. Mitigation of impacts on surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of the impacts of the proposal on the subject site itself; e. Conservation of property values; f. Provision for safe and efficient vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; • • h. Adequacy of public services to accommodate the proposed use; The proposed site plan subject to the conditions noted below satisfies these and other particulars of the ordinance. 2. The development of the site with an office park with one and two-story structures is compatible with the goal of increasing employment generating jobs. It provides landscaping and open space on the site to merge the site with the surrounding habitat. 3. The proposed footprints and maximum two-story buildings appear to comply with the Zoning Code's setbacks and height limitations.;Building Code and Fire Code compliance will be determined with the submittal and review of a building permit application. 4. As proposed and mitigated by ERC and conditions imposed by the appeal process,the impacts on surrounding uses, including the open space and heron rookery should be minimized,although all impacts cannot be removed when empty property is developed. The impact of developing the subject __ site on other developed properties should be minimal. There will be additional traffic but staff indicates that the surrounding roads should be able to handle the additional traffic. There will be the 11 y Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H October 19, 1998 Page 24 temporary noise as construction proceeds,but the developed site should not create much noise or impact. The two-story,approximately 30 foot tall buildings should not adversely impact surrounding uses. It is hoped that they will not impact the heron rookery,but that cannot be guaranteed. The existing landscaping and additional plantings proposed will eventually create a better buffer between the site and the rookery. It appears as if the applicant has proposed trash areas on both ends of the wetpond area. These areas during pickup can be particularly noisy and could adversely affect the heron. They should be relocated away from their current positions. 5. The proposal appears to be well designed. The mix of one and two-story buildings and the articulated facades should provide an interesting campus when viewed from nearby streets and from within the complex. The relatively low scale of the buildings should minimize the impacts of each building on the • others in the complex. The buildings are reasonably spaced and arranged to afford openness and the entry of light and air to the site. 6. The development should not adversely affect neighboring property values and development of the site will increase the tax base of the City. 7. The parking aisles, driveways and pedestrian pathways appear to provide both safe and efficient circulation to and from the site and within the site. 8. The site has adequate access to City utilities. The storm drainage system appears to be adequate and the applicant is entitled to use the storage capacity of the P-1 pond. Since the storm system cannot remove potentially harmful chemicals,the applicant should utilize best practices when using chemicals on the site, and should probably choose native landscaping materials as much as possible to minimize - the need to apply chemical agents. 9. Since the site is comprised of three separate legal lots,the applicant should execute covenants that development of all three lots shall remain subject to similar design standards so that they remain a coordinated development. Further, if any one phase is developed as planned,all future development of the remaining parcels shall be bound by the design standards and appearance of the completed phases. 10. In conclusion,the applicant has done a commendable job in attempting to satisfy a variety of competing demands made by its market needs,the City and environmental interests. It has designed a project which should be an asset to the community while minimizing its impacts on the unique aspects of the surrounding natural community. DECISION: The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions imposed as a result of environmental review including the conditions imposed by the ERC and as a result of the SEPA appeal. 2. The applicant shall be required to establish a Native Growth Protection Easement on Lot 1, at the north corner of the site, extending from the north edge of the wetpond north to and including the habitat buffer area. Disturbance of this area would be limited to the depositing of"dead and down"material from other portions of the site in order to enhance the wildlife habitat, or routine maintenance activity Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA=H October 19, 1998 - Page 25 for the wetpond. The Native Growth Protection Easement shall be recorded to run with the title for Lot 1. Recording of the easement shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of the building permits. 3. The phases shall be altered as decided in the appeal process. 4. The applicant shall move the trash enclosures away from the wetpond/buffer area. 5. The applicant shall utilize best practices when using chemicals, including pesticides and herbicides on the site and shall choose native landscaping materials as much as possible to minimize the need to • apply chemical agents. 6. The applicant shall provide assurances that the three separate legal lots have appropriate cross easements for parking and circulation. 7. This site plan supersedes the previous site plan. (This makes no conclusion about whether the prior site plan is or is not valid at this point.) The applicant shall have 30 days after this decision to opt for one or the other. 8. The applicant shall execute covenants that development of all three lots shall remain subject to similar design standards so that they remain a coordinated development. Further, if any one phase is developed as planned, all future development of the remaining parcels shall be bound by the design standards and appearance of the completed phases. ORDERED THIS 19th day of October, 1998. 41A-- - FRED J.KA MAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 19th day of October, 1998 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman, Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members, Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Chuck Duffy, Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Chief Administrative Officer Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler Sue Carlson,Econ. Dev.Administrator South County Journal Parties of Record Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in • writing on or before 5:00 p.m..November 2.1998. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written , • Black River Corporate Park Appeal and Site Plan Hearings File Nos.: LUA98-110,AAD LUA98-075,SA-H — October 19, 1998 Page 26 request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant,and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV,Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the • executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • • PARTIES OF RECORD Linda Baker Cheryl White Jayne Kurzeja - . -Jerry Holmes Kate Stenberg Linda Seagraves Tom Malphrus Kathryn Dugaw Barbara Batiuk Helen Ross Margaret Milnes David Stephens Chris Peterson Laura E.Goodell Donald Norman Range Bayer Janice Wagner Theodore Muller . • Connie Troyer Harold Solberg Gwen Warren Michael Magee Tim McManus Phyllis&Jerry Walsh Lauralee Smith Frank Crum Robert&Barbara Gramm Steven Hayes Don Nomura Tana Mason Susan McClellan Walter Hoffner Dennis Paulson Gerry Adams Paul Budlong Mary Marsh Ted Mallory Deney Johnson Ed Newbold . Don Norman Doug Watson Mike Sato • Dee Boersma Dalice Snider Beth Wieman Estella Leopold Terri-Jo Empens Anne D. Strode . Bill Wilson Ken Neerdink Steve Stratis Paula La77arini William Combs Peggy Jordan Y.York Jim Andrews Liane Newman Len Elliott Carol Anne Engeland Brian Lumsden Joan and Carlos Cabreza Rob Butler Susan Nix Suzanne Krom Shirley Willeiksen Jeffrey Ducken Trudy Thomas Janice&Anna Mayrhofer Brian Shelton - Bruce Harpham Alma Bennett Joan Silling Tom Pesek David Kappell Arlene Roth Beverly Franklin Tom &Julie Boardman Patricia Thompson _ Brian Gauger Chuck Lennox Amy Kosterlitz Royce Berg Theresa Hanson Ken Raedeke Hal Hagenson Lauchlin Bethune BLACKRIVER-RIVERTECH LLC • • • . /.t r - .luo-..I.�.+v2 .1r..L hl�'4lCll!r, r ; ur II jI3z. �•0d�10.��y, ,tV X,.(:�rLCT�L1vr .. .........n.. ,.- `'• 4 • :•. •.r... rrr~ "wrr !oo t f • rr.nw wnrr '„1�.. =-r dL•,�o r 4 `\h,, r iv▪ r'i _�`• SE. - • -,..••.r•, N 1 • t. ' '1''+'r y• °O. rr0��'• 3 .�\.-'t. . f' �+h . • A �i T Grdtd7 u5. •�k y'�. ▪�1 r.. . 6•N-P•• E TEA T• � �' I2 Hrr. • ▪ �� ,•J, !C • ,ram r+••�� rrq . oaq• (.5 ••• . -.1 ''':•:.---.11 k --..•:-:•••. 1,4 .., • •„, 1 7 II 7 r • 1 •� 2 , .I I .- 3 -.. • % �O•• i 1 r •' ••`•�v 7.1,1 .1: 1 ' 1 ' 7...... • •.... .\,. . 7. I :, :,.„,7 /2/ • • NCT • iO I `raids ;k"..""i i.- - �•`.`�1.\. .•""'� 4+', ,••gyp;(,Y Ibt) •'J ' •(�•/•II ;/{jr�� r I"j:y.Py I y• .`•` r,•• V' vM I :/ �'yY 7� •r,- III .41 cc Mg . �•\ r;nt�.1• �:_-.:._.• / — CIOPEIl RE}7TON. s u.r e f. r -roc. !. - t n,,. • d )�y ��>a+wt —r^--OP[NS• PACE-+---• J 98 :;fit ` I !� • • Q 15Qrlj% h µ tT I �17f turn ... 7G..11.17 ©� U •r A ir• `,iWr .„ ,r'' • r.' It " •�;`��i :•:\�f }l�` fi :CUlf OF RCNiON ' ��•3tlx Jams �4 G�� ,(�JS '*7'Y r1�°•la�k! 1`L':If�' U O lt �./ ��0 i V OP[+N STIC E 1 //.:/. + s i rr -•• ,/jA ..4.,'FT I:. .,( J ♦/%•"' ,.� r�3f• { j / `T'..:. J/`r�r -- -••- ', ec ',r• C rt..1 .� '•..- j21i Io'�. r \\ '. _• I• w •Ili, r I �v�r •1�.. L7L;.-1 • n rr, • 1Xr• ... ..1 df ,s. -. .. •J."'�' ., I t - I I i �`+•�... 1 77t•�I. y? • 0 ,K-st, �•= W • / ./ co' .% �L4 -I I OFF --'••--••. r-t••1 °;'e.7: •'• :�• • W c�CO // •1.c�11ti'.:‘ ..*..•••F,.1•DETENTION PONO"•...... l_ I I .. 'I' .. ��.:; C r • f •rS p►- ,,.{_�4‹.. r•.Su• J llYl••• 1 C•l.nN•ww I 1 '••' _`1 ^- •1 � l:i /4'. 1, •1 .f i�'a.1�: ..•P773.10 .'. • r ()y ram• ��-••'"'s:ra 7111•; \ CITY OF. ',6;,AEDO:� I IT E'C H N• C A L VC E N T E,Ri,^„-J•�1/• r..▪ - leW W Io u ' \ RENFON t' OFFICE• )•1 i..Cy -•ram 2 `` i '' OPEN-SPACE 0 \ ! ; Y y1r �i .,��i.c .' c.,r.. -`.L X X o ----t- - .•._. . ._ tti•• • t, ..N� . .R �E• %l ••1 t1 ..- 4 t��i=.-..-...•'-r! �...- ..,,•..•a.-;�,!' _t��i w • ' -r nlrll • •• -1 ,r ..111Nfilisf I.�1 /.•. •a} •r t rr. rr--: -= •/r-7 —_."- ._ CO m mcc ---- /----,.... ' •. 11:1[1 -:: '/ . = . . -t..7 F7 s r��"'Ri.' 1 I• . • W A S 7 I..N-0 T 0: .. a i •.:er.. . 7 .. • 4 �' 1S7�E . \• OFFICE . 1 M 1 F z •• I' - _ re AICNIIICIull T .as .6...... , I \ f •1iti�CI�E'�' Z - • "EAR. F . � •• • onaruNNiNO ` ry •'o I I I • • i • 1. 01" I~DJSTRIAL, re. •1 i • 31- •\\\-:. i i=``t t. METF{O i11ACIUTIES . SlN •I I �.t..:: r I =' r INDUSTRIAL r; •"sla `..."""w.. 71Nbn T E C H N I •:.0 o • o • • �• li ".� —stir-T l I A. I �. .-1 Y - 1II- '4aI` u I OFFICE r i PARK No.I. =~ F 0 R T s I I• -•Nt t ,s' �•• ... -. i.. tC .a o f ... • • .". .-l1, •.4`� (....•J it - 1 i�•-- • ` ' • r C •E N if R j ....1..1• 1 .r wry.. ... D E r T. v;\. ` � ./ _ r • I 1, .. - .. +r-c..,•, cc w sr :- . - s rtr�..i� - ..Yi•r... rwrw• ...... �• ,...a,..-. .',,_-1•- OFFICE . i �- . r 1Dr Q- —!LR�r.. rw_f. . -6 1l .r:.rt r.rrrrtl� t..—S f•�A_ .% • ..••• .. ,1 W Awn 1 t k N M aS., s ° t,.f .. . .. , : , • i .sr• s `::'• p ,�y ;` 'O, HOTEL �r• r. St 1• , w•...' t4' .i O 1 I as?f1a'r r .r' 3 1 111 SS rj;Q�lt 0 :2.1 r •i ..�•• '.•?.. d 'S'._ „•,^ram :Y' ► .I ,t„ 21 r' •IP . ,,"`Ns,:e.9`,'� • `s t �J-. ? •, 'SI' • p cY Ef {.. e .H C• NEI80RH000 •' 'fa 's .r-�' ►. I ° 1 M F({•14 111 4. ,�'. DEML I1AP /` ./ � `6 \ ,o :•'•'s •• .. •• ��. :d• ' ''..1*. ' _rr 1 YJ7llL II a i •t 1 n: s r 4 �' 0 1 I 'Tr f1 r gni / ,• ER r•'op. • s' Aiglill%4.`' Ell n,s„ .1g05u'" BLACKRIVER TRACT 'B' %\ • j P- ''% 4� • r I (� os NEIGHBORHOQD DET IL MAP r•`'NN1"'u.•.p""' d •• " 1 ,) \ „• e� t• A I f �IINY.11 Q--'- ---- " M�•..0 ..,,ru .a • % �f,E•tt .• •'•.\ w. i• i ._ >..� 1 � I .'.�.•..r SCALE 1'.200' Ir°•rIl u•.� r 1 1 I e qiV. ,) \ / / - I ruu r�}5� /r t 33 • ; t` , r IPA t• rial ,.t t`O •114001• I . Qp1ta MO \• R. .r ` • 144 M sews.MIS ( i'\• 1 _�- y ---•—- _ I CC•'i oa. rp.wu1 -��r ( . _- V41M1 bsMa1. _ I •a.va wtW14_ 1 ' A 1 _a�=1_ w-- \ fro mash tart. i to -1 t ' t •; I , _ t.IK Ltillo. t T t I eva..+ ,I n,,> o h "1 , e4.401 .IC. r —1::O~:.t:. 1 t I : ..rl rr.ta /r•' \ I t 444.4 ;µ . V< cc frri W V> >Z Ka '�~T� {!1 \;`� ♦♦�t� l� `. i LN.I C ' I I . @ Y Y O *�--- �V e♦ y�jl / t .....,. /r cya tN 1 J J W ] f /� !� r �or ♦ , �I ,, G cF14 \ 1 eat i r ! ENTON o� �m m� 1 • - a N 10• SPACE t.v.G...mi.% 4 v;M y- � '> ty�v �- it Ye+' 4 .. q 'ill . . i2t __ /)/ �y �" tI t `��('� lim A / .'i•• . - ,•' te.4 : c-f. LOTS !� A`I '\.f1' OKI tawaDC►IANNIHO % roar uta�� /r // ♦♦�S♦♦ /LOT 1\ `\': ♦ ♦♦4�,,�'• \p��,,' oaf `w• ��•`� i~'•a ...a. 7 1 f �Y` / '`'•0� • V.eie ♦♦�♦ �j,\O �O V ' ale t _ 1 4. ' .✓,�J V, `IJI \ tOMM11er 2 _ .o .ottw.rs. o.K raj I61J. VD Jp\ I ', SIB ♦♦� 'TA♦ �O^ "L.ty` p•' K 0 eW #0.- ..- �J�. Kays., � :oiu jJ I j;` °� 1 I taw1 \• • • .0 "rf/� �~�?�.LOT 2 ,IQ� �� C t / = 1 511E IUiU(LOiS 1-]) •1546.023 Sr silt row Kvor s-es-ss Q f„.� ;.4' 6:?' i� TOM.DURDING AREA 214/1,834 sr a�.�' �,//. 11 1 ti. �. I �� '•� BUILDING'A' t 22.010 sr '1 - \ .••�/AE! 111 ♦ _�+ f RU4UIH.'D' ! 32.500 Sr , �� ` //'/I/// `* OHO ,I\ '� I mmon+c'c' : 32,500 Sr .\.e::�- /�� L.`..i�''• �% ♦♦♦�''� �I' tnK w.a. tiu BUILDING'D' S ]7.E90 Sr \ `_• leee/�U// ��/�/,•'�, j� ♦. `SA/t / BUILDING'E. t 7E.9]4 Sr _ �� /4111 •-.�JO .%!)♦ ♦� ,a% MSC CM F.A.R. 3.273 SITE PLAN j 97 SOUS ♦'"••`J �� 4 '\ 41,,tij ,,,i t♦ ♦1� / PARKING RCGUUR-9'■20' 400 STALLS t.r.so. �:,�� JIJ ♦♦ EINCE.2'OVERHANG) s" exam M M� Sr `� ,. ♦♦♦ \l'A GOUPACT -E'-6' I6' 179 STALLS �� I • is SIMS . • ?.`•� a� I:t ate` / s u~.- PARKING RANO 4.0 STALL5/1000 Sr ..a,r.t �- ;�• t:ty+ // /`\ Mc stal\mt-w1e.e ... Ira \ law \• • 1.eK a.fK ' \ t\b.VIA ra �� 1 0.it. ..0-40 , �% a v.a.O.R i aT✓ .v remw /� \ • dare .tW AFL 1 SITE PLAN leo 1 0.. • +r I - ******************************************************** -u****** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 12/15/99 16 : 58 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9906231 Amount : 15 . 51 12/15/99 16 : 58 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #1147 HALINEN Init : LMN Project # : LUA99-178 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Location: SOUTH SIDE OF SR 900 BTWN 76TH AVE S & THOMAS Total Fees : 4, 715 .51 This Payment 15 . 51 Total ALL Pmts : 4, 715 . 51 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 . 42 . 1 Postage 15 . 51