Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA82-035 k E
rtY a .. (r$:;
....e '1.,, f .-1"' /4.•
�. '+.- r. ly c FtF7"yf L Ir\J
:c::T:.
t o Ly,
Iv
11405 a lish, 035 X--
. . , .
• .
..
. .
.....
..,
1.. i.
{ 1 4 4. i - •
1 'r
w ": a
;' 3i '' y
A H N
,• ,4 , )
Y
,_ . ___,
C
(..\
u . Q
4. ___H„
i .• OAKsbALE 4v. 5w
1=; : VELL AVE. evw
1-14 M A s Ave sw
V i \\ \
Z.
izA'trvioNo Ill AVE sW
t \?‘ - "
IT1 CsE.145CA ME SW
I„
SENEGA AVG sW -k I-
\ \\ \t .
Lc AV'a 5w
. \ \ ' \\ \ 6\,.
MAPLE. i AVE- c��/ h
. ,‘, ,s\......._.
.(-- ---. ( )
a-1p12t)1 t. AVE Z`M
----N
(.---
` .
p
S
S.
_
4 , y -© • BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.'98055 o 235-2540
9�TFD SEPS�M��
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH
MAYOR •
May 17, 1982
Clint Spaulding
507 2nd Avenue West
Seattle, Washington 98119
Dear Mr. Spaulding:
In reviewing your file for Site Approval (SA-035-82) at 303
S.W. 10th Street, it has been det-ermin-ed: that no land use
application or public hearing is required. Therefore, your
application is dismissed and your fees will be refunded.
Contact_ this office for details.
Very truly yours,
3.3- 1111".-0.462,1
Steve Munson •
Assistant Planner
SM:ci
•
•
rr
FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Application No (s) : SA-035-82
Environmental Checklist No. : ECF-039-82
Description of Proposal: Site approval application
for a two-story office
building.
Proponent: Earlington Park Limited
Partnership
Location of Proposal : Property located
at 303 S.W. 10th
Street, between S.W.
Grady Way & S.W.
10th Street with
the cross street
being Thomas Avenue.
Lead Agency: Building & Zoning Department
This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on May 5, 1982, following
a presentation by Jerry Lind of the Building and Zoning Department.
Oral comments were accepted from: Donald Persson, Ronald
Nelson, Robert Bergstrom, Richard Houghton, Jerry Lind, James
Matthew and Roger Blaylock.
Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings
of the ERC on application ECF-039-82 are the following:
1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by:
William L. Harris DATED: April 21 , 1982.
2) Applications : SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82)
3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance:
Building & Zoning Department, Policy Development Department,
Fire Department, Police Department, Utility Engineering
Division, Traffic Engineering Division, Design Engineering
Division.
Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined
this development has a non-significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C. 030 (2) (c) .
This decision was made after review by the lead agency of
a complete environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency.
Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance:
Will not adversely impact adjacent properties and that the
following condition shall be complied with: storm drainage
is to be underground.
Signatures :
4,1-e?W--Y
de.ittrWr eJ' anV: it
Ronald G. Nelson David R. Clemens
Building & Zoning Director Policy Development Director
Richard C. Houghtoi�'1
Public Works Director
DATE OF PUBLICATION: May 10, 1982
EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: May 24 , 1982
Date circulated : April 27, 1982 May 4, 1982
Comments due :
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET
ECF - 039 - 82
APPLICATION No (s ) . SITE APPROVAL (SA-035-82)
PROPONENT : Williams L. Harris - Elling Halvorson, Inc . for
Johnson-Lieber Co:. , Inc. (EARLINGTON PARK L.L1vir1 'Y-7271==FITP")"-®"
PROJECT TITLE : JOHNSON-LIEBER BUILDING
Brief Description of Project : Site Approvel application for a
two-stor office buildin .
Property located at 303 S.W. 10t St. , between S.W. Grady
LOCATION : Way & S.W. 10th St. with the cross street being Thomas Ave.
SITE AREA : 50,472 . 31 sq. ft. BUILDING AREA (gross) 18, 627 sq. ft.
DEVELOPMENTAL COVERAGE (%) :
IMPACT REVIEW NONE MINOR MAJOR MORE
INFO
1 ) Topographic changes : X
2 ) Direct/Indirect air quality : _ X
3 ) Water & water courses : X
4 ) Plant life : X
5 ) Animal life : X
•
6 ) Noise : X
7 ) Light & glare : X
8 ) Land Use ; north :
east :
south :
west :
Land use conflicts : Minimal
View obstruction : Minor
r -
9 ) Natural resources : X
10 ) Risk of upset : X
11 ) Population/Employment : X
12 ) Number of Dwellings : X
13 ) Trip ends ( ITE ) : 360 ADT
traffic impacts : 10th & Lind
14 ) Public services : X
15 ) Energy : X
16 ) Utilities: X •
17 ) Human health : X
18 ) Aesthetics : X
19) Recreation: X
20) Archeology/history : X
COMMENTS :
Signatures:
//7/1-1"-/-‘(< 1:1 ;r4. .
Ro G. Nelson avid R. Clemens
Building Official Policy Development Director
644,A
Richard C. Houghton',
Public Works Director
NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
• ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
RENTON, WASHINGTON
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final
declaration of non-significance with conditions for the following
project:
EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Site approval application for a two-story office building,
file SA-035-82; property located at 303 S.W. 10th Street ,
between S.W. Grady Way and S.W. 10th Street with the
cross street being Thomas Avenue S.W.
Further information regarding this action is available in.
the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton,
Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed
with the Hearing Examiner by May 24, 1982.
Published: May 10, 1982
i
t
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
MAY 5, 1982
AGENDA
COMMENCING AT 10 : 00 A.M. :
THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM
OLD BUSINESS
ECF-114-81 WILGEO COMPANY
B-268 One story shopping center (Village Square
Shopping Center) ; located on the north
side of Bronson Way N. and Garden Avenue
North.
ECF-095-81 LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES
R-090-81 Application for rezone from "T" to R-3,
maximum of 15 units per acre, to allow
future development of condominiums or
adult apartments; property located in
the vicinity of 21 Lake Washington Blvd.
North.
NEW BUSINESS
ECF-039-82 EARLINGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SA-035-82 Site approval application for a two-story
office building; property located at
303 S.W. 10th Street, between S.W. Grady
way and S.W. 10th Street with the cross
street being Thomas Avenue S.W.
,...
•* ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW C G.,....r.:TTEE
AGENDA in ir
Pel fa
PAGE TWO . i I 111011 ,, I 1 1
. r•M 444 :f 1
111111110,1 . 1
,,
, ,
„):.,. oram,
/1.. , , 4%.4,
_ /.,,.., •
—(-------4k
,
)A) . I . ,• -----1
• : :Jae- . 1, 1
/Am., 1
..„):_,..., to
. .__ .. . 4. 1, (-..______L ..... ,
--,_. I
. ..
..,,
•••,, \„..s ho '.‘ ...
: s
..\
't Tr LAKE LAKE TERRACE PARK ASSOCIATES .F
4..."474 ..• .f ,'6141.11" WASHINGTON ‘1 , . mils a ..... =167r_ \
\
III 111111°A IIMPir
—
'lb. 41....4.. IA\• : r
i . forma= mm. '''7-‘141111111 g lETIlli I i„ Li
: 1 . italligingliS. -- ' - '
— i rallq.. A .. c An
. = •- Aiiiplili" ...A1=it \ ramaimlitinfilitt 1.1 I III
X _ __...kle+.3.1 16 iton,._ .. r ', irquire IsPlip....irf N
Mb VI ii : \ ' iiiiirt, --1 s
h"
IliteNeit imo r %a v
bail men i ,
..., i
T1 -
1"--
Oe oN -91-
) , ,a JIM i illka ' , 1
_1
- ____111111.111111kintini ilk qqr w I L GE 0 COMPANY L. .
•• ,,„.:-:---1.... .; ........,,x2,, _ Vig L NI ....iL\,, -- t..._- c-----1
\
-I ',V1 ..-- Idillorfr: Ilk ri
iill VPF lip 1111 n i ..-1-I . • ;-,,,, ... , '.,‘"; I
.1-.:::-.sr.-;:.---- • i
... ..i _
\•._
1111° EARL INGTON PARK LIMITED PARTNERS HIP .._-
...,-.)::: . -.
) I Ng,loi .0. iimb,. • . .i.•...-
,,,m Imp007.011,- -46..,,A1H- Id ., .... ....1
x., !,40„,..,r;-.......inimum., - , ,, , „... . . ,_
'-'0 ,,44.-:-'*- . '`) iirit:reSIT '' ..I.-.. \-
-,41.11.1- .
II' a at, 1
lifgEhl—rigliill ; C MIR k " I
‘ ..4 I 'WA-i''..
— 1 till I '
I MOM oakf,
n'1n0I4ir5ftia-la
) . .. t 71111mNy
1a".ara1m l
w0
1
sk
e11 h'" _er_
H_•
i_:_re.._
tilij.lig all g t V., .
a .
L .
(
i; I .
• GS
..
..
.,
.,
.
,
_ , •
„
.,,,, s
•
.•
..,
r , --
•
.. ,
LAKE
YOUN
L r-i '----- 1 LI
] ] •.0•9l '
M_Jill % I
1 ...
..
.
CITY OF RENTON
APPLICATION
SITE APPROVAL
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY :�
File No . SA- p.3�=Os Filing Date J o /K..fa/��
Application Fee $ h/AJe Receipt No: acf .
Environmental Review Fee $�/��_ `
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 :
1 . Name EA LlM(LTOt I 1 I z LtMIILo ?A rNC2SP( Phone_ 2c ' d`[ I o
Address t07 '2M.}2 Ave W . SEATI E WAN qtv tic,
2 . Property location -303 5\N O11-4 '51—. E 4T 4 / VOA'
3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary)
SEsr MrAcL �D SNP
4 . Number of acres or square feet 50,E-72 • 5J (1DP. Present zoning L
5 . What do 'you propose to develop on this property?
On t-1 0,-I — L I E F5 (?— J I ht G ( rrtCE lay tLPI ►4( ?
s ITo A Totts-L OF (?2, 621 Gq F'C
-.)
6 . The following information shall be submitted with this application :
A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , Scale
existing structures , easements , and other
factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20'
B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan 1" = 10 '
C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning
on adjacent parcels) 1" = 200' to 800 '
D. Building height and area (existing and proposed)
7. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ACTION :
•
Date Approved
Date Denied
Date Appealed
Appeal Action
Remarks
Planning Dept.
Rev, 1-77
SAFECOTITIE INSURANCE COMPANY TCLEPHONF CMG) 29?•15`.,0
FOUR iH & VINE BUILDING • MAILING ADDRESS P.O. I3OX 210117
SEATTLE.WA:;IIINGTON SI-ATTLC,WA 08111
•
•
•
Lot 2
That portion of Burlington Northern, Inc. 's former right-of- •
way and of Puget Sound Power & Light Co. 's right-of-way in the
West half of the Northwest quarter of Section 19, Township 23N, {{{`
Range 5E, W.M. , in King County, Wa. described as follows:. '1
Commencing at the "intersection of the West line of Lind Ave. ,
• being 40 feet West, measured at right angles,' from the centerline
thereof, and the Northerly line of said Burlington Northern •
right-of-way, which intersection is approximately 220 feet
Northerly, measured at right angles, from the centerline of
Grady Way; thence South 77°-26'-30" West along said northerly
line 717.73 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing
• South .77°-26'--30" West 269.53 feet to a point North 77°-26'--30"
East 17.64 feet from the West line of said Section 19; thence
South 12°-33'-30" East 170.21 feet to the northerly line of '
S.W. Grady Way; thence North 77°-26'-30" East along said line
••
296.53 feet to a point which is South 12°-33'-30" East from the -
true point of beginning; thence North 12°-33'-30" West
170. 21 feet to the true point of beginning. '
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
6' :
ITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
•
•
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Application No. .4->-' r ,_(
Environmental Checklist No. 4 -�f���9JK
PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date:
Declaration -of Significance Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major•action. .
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information-
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should
includett references to un Complettees of answerslch to theseou are
questions and
now`�willich are
helpeall
get to the answersw you provide. P
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed ,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals.a Many
f the
iqut estionsds maynnotua aonpply
ttothe
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer.
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
•
I . BACKGROUND •
1. ,Name of Proponent William L. Harris - Flling Halyorsona Inc.
for ohnson-LLieber Co. , Inc.
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
2703 152nd Ave N.B. )
• Redmond, Washington 98052 '
885-3433 -
3. Date Checklist submitted April: 21; .1982: '
4. Agency requiring Checklist Building and Zoning Department
• 5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
. Johnson-Lieber Building •
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements, and other factors that.will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
• Two-story office building comprised of 18,600 sq. ft.T and a corresponding
93 parking stalls. The building is predominatly wood frame with some
masonry. Elements of the exterior include an<' enameled metal mansard
roof, glass and wood siding. ' ` -
-2-
7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
The property is located between S.W. Grady Way & S.W. 10th St. with
the cross street being Thomas. There are 50,472.31 sq. ft. in the
property. The site has been cleared and there are scrub brushes and
weeds. There is an open drainage ditch on the southern portion as
well as some power lines..
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
September — October, 1982 •
• 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
(federal , state and local --including rezones) : •
State flood control zone permit .
Building Permit'
•
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain:
No
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal ? If yes , explain :
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
. posal ; if none has been completed , but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature, of such application form:
State Flood Control Zone Permit
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
(1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures? YES MAYBE . NO '
(b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO
(c) Change in topography or -.g-round surface relief x
features? ES MAYBE NO
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?• ES M YBE NO
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site? - YES MAYBE N0
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or,
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which .
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the x
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES M YBE NO
Explanation:
There will be a small amount of excavation and grading to set t-hP
building, form the parking areas and to establish planting areas_
-3-
(2) Air. Will the proposal result in: -
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air x
quality? YES MAYBE NO
•
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? . YES MAYBE NO
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature ,.
or any change in climate , either locally or x
regionally? YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: During the course of construction exhaust will_be emitted
through the operation of machinery and equipment.
•
(3) . Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of x
water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO
(b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or x
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? xYES MAYBE NO
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water x
body? YES MAYBE NO
(e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration ,
surface water quality,, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x
YES MAYBE x
•
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of x
ground waters? YES MAYBE NO
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through x
9 -
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO
•
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through `
direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria ,
or other substances into the ground waters?
. x
\ YES MAYBE NO
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
(� ) for public water supplies? xYES MAYBE tJ0
Explanation: The roof drainage and parking area drainage will. alter the
, pattern that exists on the vacant lot, but this will be handled with a
storm system. Occupants of the building will use a normal amount of public wate
(4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: -
(a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any .
species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , X
microflora and aquatic plants)? YES M YBE NO
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or x
endangered species of flora? : YES MAYBE NO
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area , or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing x
species?• YES MAYBE NO •
(d) Reduction in acreage of any ,agricultural crop? x
Yam- M YBE NO
Landscapedfareas will add numbers and diversity of spec4Ps
Explanation: _ p
flora to an otherwise barren site.
f
. P
-4-
(5) Fauna. gill the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish , benthic organisms , x
insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or x
endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE N0
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement x
of fauna? • YES MAYBE NO
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: New landscaped areas may provide a habitat to fauna indigenous
to the area.
•
(6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO
Explanation : During construction, there will be an incre in no.iGP
levels, but this will be temporary.
(7) Will the proposal produce new light or
Light and Glare.ax
glare? YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: Security lighting of the building 6Qin�nwG may. create some
glare, but this should be Minimal:
(8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the x
present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO
•
Explanation:
(9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x•YES MAYBE NO
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: Occupants of the building will use a normal amount of electricity -
and water in the course of :their daily activities.
•
(10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YET-. MAYBE NO
Explanation:
(11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the, human population x
of an area? vrS MAYBE Ft
Explanation: Occupants of the building may commute from areas other
', than Renton. -
-5-
( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or • x ,
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
(13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in :
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? . x •
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand x
for new parking?
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or x
movement of people and/or goods?
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? xYES MAYBE NO
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: This building requires 93 parking stalls: Occupants cars
will affect traffic,.density. on• S.W. 10th,. St, , but _this should be. minimual.
Some occupants of the building may use public. transportation. -.
( 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services ,
in any of the following areas :
(a) Fire protection? x
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Police protection? - x
YES MAYBE NO ,
•
(c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? •- x
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO
-A
(f) Other governmental services?
YES MAYbE NO
Explanation:
•
(15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? . , _X._
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of` new sources of energy? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: •
(16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new ti
systems , or alterations to the following utilities:
x
(a) Power or natural gas? ' YES MAYBE NO
(b) Communications systems? x
YES MAYBE NO •
(c) Water? -:
YES MAYBE ENO
- .• 1 i
a
-6- •
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?• x
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Storm water drainage? x
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Solid waste and disposal? x
. YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: .
•
•
(17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? ' x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: •
•
• (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: •
(19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing. recreational opportunities? x
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: -
•
•
(20) Archeological/Historical .. Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
YES RAT NO
•
• Explanation: • '
•
III. SIGNATURE. .
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it'might issue in reliance upon this checklist -should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full dis losu e on my part.
• Proponent:
(signed)
' . William L. Harris - •
• (name printed).
AFFIDAVIT
•
zgtiA,/6 ri?../ /9,,4?e •
i-eye *,e/m/7,4:-/IA4Z2t.4.1)020being duly sworn, declare that
I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn ',efore me
this21st day ofApril , 19 82 •
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at Bothell EARLINGTON PARK, Limited Partnershi
_
'7
By r/7
(2Name .of Notary PubliC) --- . (Signature/of Owner)/ '\
16415 Balder Lane, Bothell, WA 98011 ,57 4.,A.0,7 /1142-"Aie eiZ //0 •
(Address) (Adaress) •
t-Cid •
(City) (State)
(d6)6) e:)---6) (17 70
(Telephone)
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Building & Zoning Depart-
ment governing the filing of such application.
•
Date Received , 19 By:
Renton Building & Zoning Department
3-82
Receipt #
CITY OF RENTON
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NAME ) ' :::•? DATE
PROJECT 6 LOCATION -i:;`,/Z-):1?.,
„
Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total
A1,7'
• Environmental Checklist
Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee
TOTAL FEES ('—'. /1 c0
Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor.
Thank you.
. .
P% A.; l• '''+'
..• k„„ til 4.1: -, tn,-.4 ,,,t ,4.:
, , t , •,,
•
1. ..7s:. $;' 8 ..,,, • , v_ w t-. •
',,,.i A .-. . ,y. ,,, ,.. .y.,•: -7-,.. ..eki,;et__,...., 1, ,,,, '‘,.. _..,4,- t. -«.,. k.....),,r,•-• ,
•
•
•'-''Ai,.. ' k•-•,., '
Kir,,,,,,hl••P
:c. •,,,/
..., ,.;,• -• 4.
"...4.-..7:-.- ,•:.-
. . .
FILE TITLE
,....,,,...,.
•
.....
.,
,.,
....,1,,..
a 1•I
1..;.,.?1.
1: ,,....
0.7 .....
gr"
I.
le;
• •:(.1
41. ..e. P
„...,
;d:
•% Ir.,,,
. lal• -t-'i 3...
...
•
? •
gi..
Z• ..i. v , 144,
‘F'''
• .,..... ,.4-41-.,.'
41'
*
4.,
43-.,-,4414,7„. ?,,,t.---, 1.k. t: '1%-''' . tl... ,,,,,,,,..1.1,p. ,.... • ,-.2, 4.,. -..x.,,,..i.ii„,.... •
•,i,
A Z,.....a'
\Ma• 1111V;i4.,•, .:,5iff.4'
AT.
•
. .
, .
. .