Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA80-002 BEG ' NING OF FILE AI FILE TITLE 002 ribl wpahthilk, / I ED Cs -1, FILM , w .., -ri 4'..t ,- -1z,,- '7,‘, •4,---,,,, ,;:c..,N,,,,,,b...,,,r,,,,,,,,,,i,r,,,„...,,,•,,,,,.„ ,,, „ , , 0.:•,..:;,,,--,....-4,,;,-;q16',-1,,,',,,le-."',4''-', .4tf,-.J.e'l sistV-P....44'k.:`.1.4.4.(,.t1...,-,1..-o,„rfj -.44: ...r.,.. .,r,1>. .,,,...,:,,,:„'„:::::.,,,',=:;,,';',..a C..74rtfiz„-'4,rgt,....,vt•*7644-p.n.::,,,,,, :..„.,:,:1.41,2tt...,.::..:.?..".„2?!.:..4..•,.fs.,. „tc.•,_ ..1 r.- 4, ,,1,;;;,?...z.i.,:,..u..,,,...„,.....,,•...:. . ..,c':.':-...;,',,,,zi`.6.:414.7j.,4 tr:..#:;0,710..J.z--', ..-4=4;41.,ot...4 ,,-,.1-,,,4- ..,,„ .,...,IL.`..,• •,-,,,,,,,A4--_`,A lit-'tvirf-,0,1,1),'44, ig,',4,1;,°,,,;,.7. :::;,!•-•-,.--„,;.....; '... . „ ° , '.:;,-,'..!:',::',;,:.,,P,, aI, ",4:-.7.,' -.°,..-441,,,,,,4eti5 t...0,*1 -0,.,11f.,.,i:v...N tkimit,,,,,,,V-iig 1.,7.i.-4.4:;I.-%-i L p cta;zs,;*t.,, P' . ... ,,90-,..M.S....-.-,!,-,:;,;,:,-.'3%,;,::!'.•,..4;', ,r;.,••:.. -,,,,,,,,11%.:.,;•,,-;•;-,li-....6 t„cliv, p,,,,:,1 r, .1,..,,w.4.4,o,,,x,i 'I.,;7-«.'.4' :‘' +'r,i it;..,id Y-4F"t..O' 'V..0 4:-VP ': .'''.':i:1,`,f 4"-'4,V.`V,,V,9:'...M-',;!e..':-•,, ' `•L'''-• .1 •• ',-,.t.,..4%.,),---•..g.,,, ,...,, ,, 41.1j1,,t-4- 5-,,t,.....4,,..tt h., . ,..r.,,... .., ..4.,...4...4.0 p.. Nit,-,.,4.,,, ., *.,.,..,, 10., _ ,..., f... f.,„...„,1‹, ...,,...,,,„•.1..,:-.,.,,,i„-...z,• .i .. ,,-.-... , . i "s:':',;•VV;Ptq.-eati4', '.-,-'''-A-7-:0;.,is,.:11.-..qfirt*/;51,-",,44`..':Ii-f64`4^4e'''''' I:rlf"T': 5,1!'‘' w.' -A-.,- %V.41• ..11,211;r1.01N1 •7.•,t,•!:•,:,''.'q.V,•- !;--,..-::,,. • : ;N'."''-•'''tV'.'4;r4'i'lrijA2it ,.."+tt„M,„,,. WW,ft,P 7 ''.',I,;.-,'' '2A:*Met:cj,,V41,;•,41 t',1;',. ,`„1;'"4.,',-)0e4,01.4:4:,=.4rii,,;:tp,; ',-4,,,,,s,•ti;•`.i. '4;...=,:,-.06...,.,,.. a.,.,4 14.,:r.-2' ,s.C:ikize,;...}. •',G.,.?.,:r.',.•,,e:-''.•.*:•,•`Te-.-;,:i-r1,.,•.1-ft.:,;',.,,,,..:v.-;icic.t1,•••••.-f,•N,...,t,:•:!.;,..,:-:';',,qq.,.,,, •••,..x.:,,-.,:i id,,- •.-•L.I.",•••' ,•i.'.r,':'•;•i•;'-'.i":',!`;',:.•• ••'s• ... . '• • . •:."-.,:,,,K,.,E,f.'',:i'A, ;‘,. P., #,,,,L,1,0,-,,,,,,r: ,, .,o....,,r,„.. .14, ,,k,,..4....'4,'..,0, -i.r..,..,.',,,w-5.,,.. ,1.:,!1.:,..,.,,,t,,,,.:f,,,,,,,...;"..e.„.*,..;.,,i'a4-,,,,,Vr.:,-11;,.l,...4 Vin,';',-.:.;:,,:.,ik-,- ,,.:J%,:Piti,-_,,,,,.....,:!;:,,,.;.„ ,...,.;;- • •, '' W.::3•‘' :'' •}";:.4-44'54. 1"'..e. !=ttVil't.' ':-"'iff "ers" ',.,-.:”'''''s.."1':•'!'''. .•••' '' . yr,f;r1If$CR.,.,44f:1411..:.",,t,liAr,'?',.:;Z',..i-..::.'11,:•. ..;'•'tl`t.';';',41'&•N•.",l''',..i.'f•t'i?..ig':h%:',1:V,•:'''.'.•:'..ili:4•!:•;;: l.::::-1,:f •t• '••:,•!,,':.Ti• ;-'Fre,.;','J;?..;.,.! ,,'1!;',;_,,,4'.';•.,:. " ,,...:':''', i'.'',:" '. ',' ''..-''EVI:• 3:':'•'-" . .3'-` : L', .' . '-f.q!i:j-,,';', ' '.;:.-,-,.. ...-' '..: ..'.',''''1 ';-:':','.•:',-';',...•...: -.',.',-,'-,• ."-'': '', ...::,.'. • : . . ._„,..,:,...•-,,fi:„ —',,'...,,,i,,,..',.0- '•, . . •,. . ,. , , , : . . • ... , . •. ... .. „ .. ' . • ,. , . ,..., ,:.-4i,•',i,"';• .. . . . . . ' '. ':•.,rt':'.7'.;.'''.'?'- , ,. . . . • • . - . . .; ;•';'„,':',F,•". - . , . . . ,... • „. .. .. . . .. . ..,. , ., . . .• ... • . : • . ' . . . ' . . ., . . Al, . . ' . . . • . ' . • . . . . .. • •. , • • . . • • . . . _.) . . . • . ' • s. • I . , • . . . i ,I• • . . . . RECEIVED . . , .. CITY OF RENTON . . . ..i HEARING EXAMINER , ° ;, t• i .-.; FEB 2 6 1980 A7M18f91101111121112131415P16M ,.. ., :.,.. • . . • ' . . , . a . . . . ' • . . • , . •.'i'.4:•, - EXHIBIT NO. / • . . - ... . . •:•,-,.!. . ,:..•••;„.: • . ITEM NO. R.-- 6'0'2 F° . . . . •' .• • •mai fe..0. , . •'.4-...• .... OR 6 I iVA1VC.P IV 0 . 34 I Z.b . . • . 1.,,,,,-, • • • . . . . .. . ..... t,....,.-„,• .: .,•, ,• : .• . .. . . . %,':;`,..''L:.',:'::.::.ii.:....;..• .' .. ,.: . ... ,,I.J.':.'::..: ':.:''•1'''.: - ... . . . ..1 Z:'; -!;','..... :-'•'',..1i:•'•': ' . . . , . , ::;•‘",il'S'.ii.'.:,,• , ; •,: . . . . ,,... . 1, . ,. • I k&:;;',''•:-:.',,•,•.-..-.,:,*,•',;, . ;,. . . . •. , . . i,i'f q:A4-.,•••,''•-'-':.'•'.,'",. ' ' " . ,. • , l','. ,-:7: . r-••,. -;,,,,,' . •• . . . ..,,;,:i:,I.1.: .,... . •. :li:.. • • • •.7').`!.,•.'.'.':'.'.•:'''':''':... ' . . . '''';:'!'''',...3,',''.."':'7•4';':,.;., • 4:,Ir,',1,1':','.'•,,,,,•••• :L.. , . . . . . , :.'...',•,'1- : ;;,:•• •...- . . . q.r•-i':, ','..,..',:i• ... ,„ . . • • • '-ts,e'r•V'',":!‘.•,;•••:: .' '• -- , , .. • ^4;:',.4,:i'','`.;.. .':'''':!::.''•.'": .: :„ . . . .. .. .. . i',..'!'..'•1,`:''''.i:: :::.'..7i 1:;.; ' ''- '' . •• . . ... .,,•$„'-.3?•,-C;;:''.;•i,,,!--1'o -• . „ • .. • - -,';`,''..!:,'..,.40,•• -., - . •. . '..:••,::,!...!'•-'.,,:, •',.'".....:. • '• .', '•• . - .. -• . ..;:!!.,.:: - . • i. . . , 1 a; , ICOO Z-YU Form 81 'i' t Affidavit of Publication . STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. COUNTY OF KING, C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington;that it is.a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the annexed, being a Retail ad , was published in said newspaper, and not in a Sean// 7 (d • supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the t14eguler nud-,.1rtii.. issue of said paper oh the following day or days May 7 , 1980 $31 . 0 7 Ordinance No. 3420 • Se on! Z.o.✓E i _ and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to its,subscribers during all of said period. • i CITY OF RENTON,WASHINGTON . ORDINANCE NO.3420 AN ORDINANCE OF ING CITY OF RENTON,CLAS- (1' WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLAS-' SIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GEN- ,A '4:/-2 ) IL. ERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G) TO % ,(�ifM ,' BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) AND RESIDENCE / MULTIPLE FAMILY(Cha) l ' WHEREAS under Chapter • Subscribed and sworn to before me this Second _day ter 7,Tit)Title IV(Bulltl- Ing Regulations)of Ordinance No.1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of ' Renton,"os amended,and the mops and reports of J u 1 y 198 0 adopted in conjunction therewith, the property /; hereinbelowraldescribed has heretoforesG-1) beend zoned . �� // D as General Clossillction District(G-1);and (� WHEREAS a proper petition for change of -- zone classification of sold property has been filed Wary Mlle C to 4 Stale `r_Washington with the Planning Department on or about Janu- Mitt' WOW "- cry 4,1980,which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for Investigation, study and ; public hearing,and a-public hearing having been -.; held thereon on or about February 26, 1980,and ..said matter having been duly considered by the .Hearing Examiner and sold zoning request being • In conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, • as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all '-' parties having been heard appearing In support ' • thereof or In opposition thereto, -NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS. • FOLLOWS: SECTION I:The following described property In the City of Renton Is hereby rezoned to _ '- Residence Multiple Family (Cha) and Business �'---� - - -- ---- -----� ----- ,d-t District(B-1)as hereinbelow specified;sublect to • . the findings, conclusions and decision dated - - -_ ' - .- - March 6, 1980; the Planning Director Is hereby _ - • " -.r: authorized and directed to change the maps of the - -. - -_ _-- - _ .-�ri; --, ____ _ r=-1 Zoning Ordinance,as amended,to evidence sold _ a-.' - - • rezoning,to-wit: F~• - - - /j -. -' See Exhibit"A"attached hereto and mode r- -- -• h 1 .a part hereof as If fully set forth herein. ' : . -- (Said property being located at the vicini- - 'k .- (Said{ ty of 1320 Union Avenue N.E.) - _ -_.�� that i' ration on ofD BJECT FURTHER Restrictive Covenantsxecutedin byDPeti- - - - - • - "_ - 'i- tioner-owners on or about March 25, 1980 and - - - -.lig recorded in the office of the Director of Records ' - • - _ -_. •- and Elections,Receiving No.8004070364 and which ` _ - _ - - 11 said Covenants hereby Incorporated and mode a - - - `part hereof as if fully set forth. _ - - - - 'g;, SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effec- - - - - - '- five upon its passage,approval and five days after ' • ,s its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL,this 28th 'lit Hoy of April,1980. (s)Maxine E.Motor, - Deputy City Clerk - _- _" - "- - - - - APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 28th day of April,1960. . _ _ • ,.t (s)Barbara Y.Shinpoch,Mayor - - _ �w, _ .•- ..., Approved as to form: . ' fy t - /� - ..1 _ _.. _ _ (s)Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney , ; a Doe of Publication:MaY 7,1980 • - - - _ • ; - r. :; .i = ' i3 EXHIBIT'A" • s _ j - -Lt BEALE REZONE _ --•-- _ ,.._.:i'..- - _--- - ORDINANCE NO.3420 - - '" -- " - - - - - ` s` = = — 36. - t. That portion of the southwest quarter of the -" - - -" - - - - - " - - - �► ' iv southwest quarter of Section 3,Township 23 North, - Range 9 East, W.M., in King County, Wa., ,3. _ described as follows: - Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivi- sion;thence north 89-24-22 east along the northerly line there of 372.37 feet;,thence south 1-10-21 east 534.00 feet to the true point of beginning;thence' south 1-10-21 east 100.00 feet;thence south 89-24-22 west parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision 340.3 feet more or less to the easterly line.of the wcsterty 20 feet in width of said subdivision; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which Is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which Intersects the true point of begining;thence north 89-24-22 east parapet wall said northerly line 340.37 feet,more or less to the true point of beginning;EXCEPT road. B 1 . That portion Of the southwest-quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 3,Township 23 North, Range 5 Eost, W.M., In King County, Wo.,. ... described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of sold Subdivi- - sion;thence north 89-24-22 east along the northerly line there-of 372.37 feet;thence south 1-10-21 east 634.00 feet to the true point of beginning;thence south'1-10-21 east 398.16 feet,more or less,to the .northerly, line of.primary state highway *2; -thence westerly along said northerly line to the '=i:easterly line of the westerly 30feetIn width of said -:,-•,..4irbd(vision; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel ,•:..:wittt the westerly line of sold•slfbdivislon tau line _ Which Is parallel with the•northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of ;,:;.beginning;thence north 89-24.22east parallel with • - 'sdld northerly line 340,3 feet,more or less,to the true point of beginning,EXCEPT-road: . \i,7 1/.' / 4 Renton City Council 4/28/80 Page 2 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means. Committee recommended the following Ordinances for second and final readings: IORDINANCE #3420 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of certain Beale Rezone properties within the City from General Classification District (G) R-002-80 to Business District (B-1 ) and Residence Multiple Family (R-3) . Property located in the vicinity of 1320 Union Ave. NE. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYES: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED: 1-NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3421 An ordinance was read creating a special fund known as Cumulative Cumulative Reserve Fund #3421 for the purpose of fund accumulation for Reserve construction and installation of trunk sewer lines in the Honey- creek and Kennydale areas as described in Ordinance #3409. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYES: TRIMM, CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, REED; 1-NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3422 An ordinance was read amending a portion of the City Code relating Cabaret to cabarets and conduct of employees or entertainers therein. Amendment MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3423 An ordinance was read making it a violation to abuse or torment Animal Abuse animals used by Police agencies and establishing penalties. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3424 An ordinance was read amending a portion of the City Code relating Trunk Line Charges to facility- and trunk connection charges and establishing a trunk for Entire City line service area in the Honeycreek and Kennydale areas and establishing the amount of said trunk line service charge upon connection to the public sewer and increasing such charges annually. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4-AYES:TRIMM,CLYMER,HUGHES, ROCKHILL; 1-NO: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Excuse Councilman MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, TO EXCUSE COUNCILMAN REED WHO Reed WAS CALLED AWAY. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3425 An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer Publication of of funds in the amount of $1 ,000 to provide for publication of Environment environmental determinations. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, Determinations TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE, #3426 An ordinance was read providing for appropriation and transfer of Advance Travel funds in the amount of $1 ,000 to provide sufficent funds for advance payments of travel expense of City officials and employees. MOVED CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3427 An ordinance was read establishing a new fund to be known as the City Shop "City Shop Relocation Fund". Fund number designation #3427. Relocation Fund MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ' ALL AYES. CARRIED. ORDINANCE #3428 An ordinance was read prohibiting overnight parking of certain Overnight trailers, buses, and commercial trucks in residential areas Parking of the City and providing a penalty for the violation thereof. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: CLYMER, HUGHES, ROCKHILL, STREDICKE; 1-NO: TRIMM. CARRIED. RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting April 28 , 1980 Municipal Builuing Monday , 8 :00 P .M. Council Chamuers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to 'he flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROBERT HUGHES, COUNCIL RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN W. REED. MOVE' BY TRIMM, SECOND STREDICKE, EXCUSE ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER CHAR ES F. SHANE. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administ ative Assistant; RAY CALDWELL, Police Dept. ; BRUCE PHILLIPS, Fir; Dept. MINUTE APPROVAL Councilman Hughes requested correction to the minutes re c.baret ordinance that neither male or female go go dancing contri •uted to the betterment of the community. (Page 3). MOVED BY TRIM , SECOND HUGHES, TO APPROVE MINUTES OF 4/21./80 AS CORRECTED. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Michael Hanis, 405 So. 4th Renton, representing Whitewater Constr. , Mr. Hecock (Eden Estates) . Mr. Hanis requested council review present city code,which does not state that plats can be completed in phases Development of as being requested for the development of Eden Estates -as they are Eden Estates unable to meet the conditions re access. MOVED BY CLYME' , SECOND TRIMM, TO REFER MATTER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COM ITTEE FOR REVIEW AND POSSIBLE CODE REVISION. CARRIED. Lakeview Towers Robin Little, 264 Maple Ave. NW, stated his opinion that t e building permit for Lakeview Towers Condominiums should not be rene ed .and the city should once again consider designating the property a- single family residence. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follow- the business matters included: U.S. Dept. of Police Chief requested authorization for Mayor and City Clark to Justice-Agreement sign Agreement with U.S. Department of Justice for confine ent for Confinement of prisoners held by their agencies subject to space avail .ble. of Prisoners Council approve. Warranty on New Fire Chief requested reimbursement of money paid from equi •ment Apparatus- maintenance account (warranty on new apparatus) in the amo nt Reimbursement of $566. 14. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Police Officer Mayor Shinpoch appointed Brian .J. Wilson to the position o Police Appointment Officer in the Renton Police Department effective May 1 , 1 '80, subject to the customary six-month probationary period. Appointment to fill a departmental vacancy created by retirement. Cou cil confirm. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA. TARRIED. Approval CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Flood Wed Edens of Federal Emergency Management Agency was unabla to Hazard unattend due to a Special Meeting being held by the City o Kent. Presentation of the completed flood plan hazard maps in co nection with the City of Renton will be rescheduled. OLD BUSINESS City Insurance Due to the present status of the city insurance it was MOVED BY REED, SECOND STREDICKE, TO REFER MATTER OF THE CITY INSURA CE TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. 1 r ' OF -124, o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ ® Z MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 LL n rn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 0�,o co' CITY CLERK 09gT�0 SEP1°4'�P April 10, 1980 Mrs. Arthur Lec1e 432! Sunset Blud. NE Rci .on, WA Y30` . Dear i rs< 3ea I e.: The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, Apr m 1544,),0 has adopted Ordirnnce ),!31,20 A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM:j'eb sc Enclosure CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON - ORDINANCE;NO. 3420 AN ORDINANCE-.OF ,THE "CITY';OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ' . :CHANGING THE ZONING : :CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES.WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION-. DISTRICT (G)`'TO BUSINESS_DISTRICT (B-1) AND RESIDENCE'MULTIPLE.`FAMILY'" (R-3) (R-002-80) WHEREAS ',under'.Chapter' 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as ,the' "Code of General ,'Ordinances of the City of Renton", as • amended, and the maps '.and reports;' adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G-1); and r. WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification,of said property has been filed with,, the. Planning Department on or about January 4, 1980, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or. about February 26, 1980, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan,' as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or 'in ,opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE ;CITY COUNCIL OF THE, CITY. OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO , i ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence Multiple Family (R-3) and Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated March 6, 1980; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and, directed to change the maps of ' ; the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: 11 See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof }" as if fully set forth herein. (Said property being located at the vicinity of 1320 Union' Avenue N.E.) AND SUBJECT FURTHER to that certain Declaration of Restrictive Covenants executed by Petitioner-owners on, or about March 25, .1980 and recorded in the office of the Director of Records and Elections, Receiving No. • 8004070364 and which said Covenants herebyincorporated and made a part hereof as if fully-set forth. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE-CITY COUNCIL, this 28t1flay of April, 1980. Maxine E. Motor, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 28thday of April, 1980. -3 MdJ S11.ti C� { Barbara Y.hinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warr , CityAttorney Y . . Date of Publication: May 7, 1980 1 ! .- i EXHIBIT "A" BEALE REZONE File R-002-80 ORDINANCE NO. 3420 R-3 That portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W.M. , in King County , Wa . , described as follows : Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision ; thence north 89-24-22 east along the northerly line there of 372 . 37 feet ; thence south 1-10-21 east 534 .00 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence south 1-10-21 east 100 .00 feet ; thence south 89-24-22 west parallel with the northerly .line of said subdivision 340 . 3 feet more or less to the easterly line df the westerly 30 feet in width of said subdivision ; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning ; thence north 89-24-22 east .parallel with said northerly line 340 . 37 feet; more or less , to the true point of beginning ; EXCEPT road . B-1 That portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 3 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M. , in King County , Wa . , described as follows : Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision ; thence it north 89-24-22 east along -the north"erly line there-of 372 .37 feet ; thence south 1-10-21 east 634 . 00 feet to the true point , A. of beginning ; thence south 1-10-21 east 398 . 16 feet , more or less , to the northerly line of primary state highway #2 ; ; a!, thence westerly along said northerly line to the easterly line of the westerly 30 feet in width of said subdivision ; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel with the westerly line I { of said subdivision to a line which is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning ; thence north 89-24-22 east parallel with said northerly line 340 . 3 feet , more or less , to the true point of beginning , EXCEPT road . �r ' • . (, j• • i. j ,' !M ,>' ..•�I •t• • .., �j. .2 ‘, ;1. lam' 'Aj • r�' -).`' `�•'�-r �..• ~ r• •, 1,i[,•:V4' ''•..t lam 1 . •• 4..•:._ . • 1 .•.. :` I ,V' •1. 1 es.:_a,' r••••••••• I I , '. Ltil:,?( 741.4.1:1/..: t.':-,.?//f .:/ rdIR-1 i 1410; , _ 1 . 1 .1. • - r.. _ 1. ......m �' 1 } _ w tI, 4. • ,,,j •_ ,N.P.- • . . 1 1.., a . .Y,e.._- .a�•,v fit.f t i,' +.sr '�.r , .•. l «••d{uv ! fact , p',.o . r:•.•,a y..••. - --e : • V 7_____ e —G R-2. R-3 . 11 _ • V i� i II .--ki•--lik-2 SR,1.... •••••411.. 6 . , :-}.:A. .;_��_: ' • • j l l ..-. a...- G t- I lei ..........• ...... R-3e , . 1•._, 141. ............t. •Iallh.••••••,.anhii t_., •I . . mil(•� G.7 4 ;,. 1-77•Fr..4 . -57-7;"; , .,,, . .,,,,,--...., ,•,.....Id ....• • ••-•`q .Y'•'1"• ,'s�T•�w' • . ' ' t_41,-4$<,..--- :-4 ,1• 3 —t,- • •4111,i1:,:.,.,PN:1 '.; f-46.•,. ';--11 :.. .• 5 .-?'ita I, ' r-M1,". -.:IV'4.11 . . ■®� • -. i �+.... -=a-w+ I`• • 1-41...., y1 �i-• n '0~�T ' r 4� •r ar®�•n a.::: • I •• •.e••dt l S...•...•••a. • I i GI.. I\. 9 • .-1 .... . . .ti.,i4 ,-,iLl. 'vls... • • :• 6 • .' ° -- rii; G. 1 • L. . cl-r.• t. . 1-!'-il..-'-' !1,1-1_-;-. . : ..Ifil ;,;/ Al : ,, I ...is . . • ! ...1 . MRS. ARTHUR BEALE •R-002-80 APPLICANT MRS. ARTHUR BEALE TOTAL AREA ± 3. 74 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Union Avenue NE and Sunset Blvd NE • EXISTING ZONING "G" , General Classification District EXISTING USE One single family residence in center, remainder uudevelup d . PROPOSED USE Future development of retail and service shops mud a. prufessluual u1ilt;e neuter. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial, Medium Density Multiple Family COMMENTS OF R4, 4$ © z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 • o •.MINDL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER po Pco. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 94TED sEP1 S April 29, 1980 • M . Dick Kloppenburg 15404 N.E. 6th Place Bellevue, WA 98007 RE: File No. R-002-80; Arthur Beale Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Kloppenburg: This is to notify you that the referenced rezone request was approved by the City Council at its regular meeting of April 28, 1980 by adoption of Ordinance No. 3420. Sincerely, Fred J Kauf an Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk 1) Renton City Council 4/7/80 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued ' Call for Bid City Clerk reported bid opening March 26, 1980 for construction Construction of Burnett Linear Park. Ten bids were received. See bid of Burnett award following. (See attached tabulation sheet) Linear Park Bid Award- Parks/Planning/Public Works Departments recommended acceptance Burnett of low bid by Frontier Landscaping in the amount of $121 ,543.50 Linear Park for park work and storm line for construction of Burnett Linear Park. Mayor and City Clerk authorized to sign contract. Council , Approve. Alley Vacation Petition for vacation of portion of an alley located between VAC-1-80 Burnett Ave. N. & Park Ave. N. and N. 30th St. & N. 29th St. Eugene Casper as petitioned by Eugene Casper with 69% of signatures for abutting property owners. Refer to Public Works Dept. , Board of Public Works and Transportation Committee for determination re appraisal and retention of utility easements. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting May 19, 1980 for public Hearing. Council concur. Beale Rezone Hearing Examiner decision Rezone R-002-80, Mrs. Arthur Beale, R-002-80 for G to B-1 and B-2 for property located at 1320 Union Ave. NE, approval subject to restrictive covenants. Council concur. 4- Preliminary Plat Hearing Examiner decision and reconsideration preliminary plat PP-453-79 PP-453-79 Canyon Oaks,as requested by Swanson-Dean Corp., property Canyon Oaks located Kennewick P1 . NE between 28th & 30th. , approval subject to restrictive covenants and reconsideration revisions. (Restricti\ve Covenants to be filed at time of final plat) Council concur. Claim for Claim for Damages was filed. by Shawn Marie Preston for alleged Damages tire damage from hitting hole on roadway. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Claim for Claim for Damages was filed by Corrine Kanzaki for alleged fall Damages on .sidewalk landscaping. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Claim for Claim for Damages was filed by Edward C. Newson for alleged personal Damages damages. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Summons & Superior Court Summons and Complaint filed by Edward C. Newson Complaint for personal damages. Refer to City Attorney. Ordinance Police Chief Darby requested an ordinance relating to animals re K-9 Animals used by the Police Department. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, APPROVE ABOVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. Approval CARRIED, CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Request for Letter from Shupe Holmberg, P.E. , was read requesting latecomers Latecomers agreement for sanitary sewer connection In the Bel-Shane Addition Agreement to serve the proposed plat of Weathered Wood II . MOVED BY HUGHES, Bel-Shane SECOND ROCKHILL, TO REFER MATTER TO THE UTILITIES COMMITTEE. Addition CARRIED. (Councilman Shane noted for the record he has no connection re the above property.) OLD BUSINESS Gambling . Councilman Shane noted government tax expires on pull tab machines. Tax MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER MATTER OF VETO IN EFFECT THAT LOOSES THE STATE REVENUE FROM GAMBLING DEVICES WITH IDEA THAT THE CITY WILL TAKE OVER THAT TAX TO PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Recess . Moved by Stredicke, Second Shane to recess. Motion failed. Renton City Council 4/7/80 Page 4 Old Business - Continued Community Community Services Committee Chairman Stredicke submitted Services committee report encouraging the administrative staff to m-ke Committee application for Phase II of Renton's bikeway trail (Rainie Phase 2, Bike Avenue corridor) connecting the Rainier Avenue bikeway to the Trail Interurban bikeway in Tukwila providing for. funds under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1978. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMME DATION. CARRIED. P-1 Channel Community Services Committee report noted Metro oppositio to change in P-1 Channel and since council approved an alternate channel for that area, no action is required at this time. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN T E COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Request for Community Services Committee report recommended that the Radio Station request, as submitted from Secoma Communications, Inc. , Towers for a 99-year lease of City property in the wetland area east of the Valley Freeway (SR-167) for radio station towe s be denied. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND HUGHES, CONCUR IN T E COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Talbot House Councilman Stredicke noted updating of Talbot House Special Special Permit Permit is an adminstrative function. Mayor Shinpoch will check into which division has authority and report back to coun il . Lakeview Towers Councilman Stredicke inquired re Lakeview Towers Condominium Condominium building permit status. Warren Gonnason, Public Works Di ector, Building noted meeting sheduled with Lakeview Towers for progress eport Permit set for Tuesday, 4/8/80. Public Safety Public Safety Committee Chairman Hughes submitted committ=e. Commitee report recommending no changes be made in the Smoke Detector - - Smoke Detector Ordinance. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, CONCUR IN T E Ordinance COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Sale of OK Public Safety Committee report recommended approval of th. Cab Co. OK Cab Company to Mr. Richard T. Pierce. Committee also recommended Taxi Cab Ordinance be revised to establish on y two taxicab zones in the City (southwest corner on.Wells Ave. South Taxi Cab Code at South 3rd St. and first parking space south of Houser ay on Revision the east side of Wells Ave. So.) referring matter of code revision to the Ways and. Means Committee. MOVED BY REED, SECONDS ANE, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Prohibiting Public Safety Committee report recommended an ordinance b- Overnight adopted prohibiting the overnight parking of all type trailers Parking of designed to be drawn by a motor vehicle except recreation trailers, Certain Trailers and buses and trucks used for business purposes in whole or in part excluding pickup or panel trucks of less than one ton rat-d capacity in residential areas of the city only. Refer to ays and Means Committee. MOVED BY REED, SECOND SHANE,TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer submitted committee Committee report recommending the matter of the Cabaret Ordinance Cabaret amendment be referred to the Public Safety Committee as -n. Ordinance additional change has been suggested by the Police Depar.ment. ' MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTE: RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. n`r il_ o � IGJ ,A64.1-7J r/� 1. � 26o07 Mrs. Arthur le�a It-00 • DECLARATION,'OF 'RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Arthur R.• Beale: arid his. wife Dorothy' M. Beale; and. Donna R. Nolan, as her separate estate-, are'the owner's'. of the following: real property in the City of Renton, Count y, • of.,.Kin h Y g, ":State. of ',Wash'i:ngton, 'described.:-.as follows:.- ' , �. •- • :`That"portion :of. .the...southWest ;qua'rter of the southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23' Nortl ,.;'.Range"5Eas't;_:W.:M: ,, in King County, Wa, described as -=" Beginning at:the' northwest corner of said subdivision;. thence north 89 24-22 east along the northerly line there of•,372.37 feet; thence south 1-10-21 T east 534.00 feet'•,to the':.true pint 'of beginning.; •thence south .1-10-2I, east -. `:r) ,,fin 1.. ,:y .i .: 'N w's C?.'', n:.:<•r^'c:..•.'z"-t.a.. 9 " .f, et< a I/� ..4 BNI'.- e :.ams.�.ny .:: • >;°ems' ,��I �.y.�f 9 �,�e,YA{ya�:-�:z_ ��t�:' ,.➢�.; "e�.t�l:•^�`i�'`it `i•�. . . ':L'•:; ..ln .y.A'A:P,: ^'r.S,�. „�� 3�i.c{ k-..�j � s Ik:! ..?xT3f. ,..,;,- rui,. ;��'" ti,3' :.5'.n` i".Si';-. :.s,,.,.r.�,h, �:rt:k:..fi...t`>; `'' :.s.�� :#b,+, �,t.... TZ4:;: 00. r-W2's''�»fhsn<e�`=`westerl'y_`a ' "g•�-'sai "northerly line to the" easterl line of.,the : westerly 30 feet ,in width":of said subdivision;. thence north 1-23-12 west parallel •with the westerly`line'of said subdivision to a line which parallel with -the northerly line of said subdivision..and which intersects the true point of beginning, thence .north 89-24-22 east parallel with the northerl `'.'hire: of::=;said: subdiv s on;':;340:37• feet' ':more;.or`1"ess tb •the'•.true ' •ia .'. ,... .., .... „ _ Fite- -" .. oint of: b in^ g. �. C �''r `'ad"' •' 'WHEREAS, the owners' Of said°'descr"'ibed''property, hereinafter "the property, desire"to impose the following restrictive covenants running. with the land, as to use, Present and future,: of the'-'property - , ` NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid",owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions 'and;covenants." running' with the 'land.as to .the,-use of the' land hereinabove described with respect'to. ''the use by; the undersigned, their`successors, heirs and assigns, as"-follows: d'Y 1..3..:.:E .. x.`n kt*.1,+q' Y,'y:, 1'�' •iJW,Sr^I.'ank�� r.JLY.:A:.'}��', ,r,1,..-,. `.tav'!C hyt...,,,; .:. '. .. ,+''f,'•','.H .:f''f-r. -,;S',;, .r?,:z.f ti. �.. ax.,¢?c�_,,?4^G'%:,>4, "'r, ..L�;,:,tv!d•�.:...,.+,» 1>e± .r�'r rH;r•=�: f3«'-'t;rx�'L... fi,:;W? It shall be .the: responsibility of ,'the:owners:.lof the ,property to install and maintain , a 20-foot. landsca e ',buffer: and fencproperty. 1,- e.'alongthe,north , line, and to instal_ and maintain a 15-foot:,landscape, buffer. and fence along the east property line. Honeydew Creek shall be preserved and incorporat1ed intoany.development:plans for[ , , the property. • DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If" at any time improvements are installed purs:uant to these covenants, the portion of the ,' covenants pertaining to: the:-.specific;_.i:nstalled"improvements ''as required''by 'the Ordinances of',the City of Renton;'shallx :terminate'wit°hout necessity of further ,' • documentation. ' , Proper legal procedure's ,in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by Y'. _ I ,eft -`o'f`'-Reiff on��` r o ;ari:�•- 'rt� L'ert.";::`c�'wn+er's%�"ad:o,inin• .,sub_'ec,t".; ro ert.' ,.,who.• are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys', fees,-incurred;;.durlhg,,a'n;enforcement proceeding will " 'e b " borne_:,', by•'the" parties whom the. court determines -are; in error and. ;shall be.entered as a -judgment,•in"such action: „ • :. ^?' 1' S k"•Vtr ... „.: . ,ih... .�... •,lad i'4'•�` •Y - Beale xx r iu<,yid» .... ..��•r.�tiii^` .a�+:; ,F-rv:: _ , —, M / e Dor h o"t eal A OF STATEWASHINGTON - • :CO Y F KI UNT 0 NG ;Page.' One af,"'Two, fit" _ - ^ this'` day. cf _ 19 �, 'before,me personally appeared , .' -.ArthurR.:•Beale an&hi.s wife Dorothy M. Beale, the persons who executed the within ' ,and'foregoing- instrument;. and..acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act. and"deed ofisaid,persons.,'for the,uses and .purposes therein mentioned. .IN 7grWITNESS-WHEREOF, I. .have :hereunto set, my hand and affixed my .official seal ' .the day and 'year 'first:above written.. , N: .r A ; c r a `,0 ... Washington residing in :?. r; :,-.. Notary Public in and the_yState of Washi o resz i n. . = :44. Y,.,_, _ ..� 2Y• j�-� �bi� a 'Citi y�t-,, e"i.�.s }'&'.",�". �'` F. !,. i t..�t.- ' .U�` �.%Ad- fir. r, ,�^ �,' ..SAI c'ir::��W„r�4:1 .�Y'�x tw !a M :y". ,i. '"u��:,.''a'r>: .,t. %PLC;;.. p .a rr, -t`'i': ,r',, .:,a:•� ar,r „a�;5..4.,v '��. .. • 1 p na"., o a as er .sepa a'e= es a e �'STAT F WASH E.O INGTON 'COUNTY OF KING On this `s' ,•"day of . .'. 19 , before me personally appeared. Donna R. Nolan, the person who executed'the within'.and foregoing instrument, and ' acknowledged said instrument to. be, the free:and voluntary act-and deed of said ;' ;, person for the uses and'purposes,' therein'mentioned.: IN WITNESS WHEREOF,' I. have hereunto set my and and affixed.my:official seal the day and year first,above.writt'en. / ., ..,.. `s..'stt +c. ',rs;m,. ..:.%iszc�s y. ,,,.T „,-,.c.,rs;,;4 Hi' 1 , .ok,,:?";.v.-i .di:at a _. .- , -, - ,, ..., {�; �;;�" .�tirx�`�:,: ..w. t7 � � 1' r nfnasaenq—t `a^.,F:_aysur:;•, na�'��'ar `t � •sr of Washington, residing in ,_�',4,,AA P 11 10 R t" - • . - ' . RECORD & LLLC1-#fNS . - . , Kifif. L,iir I ',r . • Page, Two of 'Two OF R.4,A �� ® THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • nail - rn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 90 43- CITY CLERK 0 SEPS,kse • April 24, 1980 Mr. & Mrs. Arthur Beale 4325 Ni Sunset: Blvd, Renton, WA 98055 Re: Recorded documents - Restrictive Covenants Dear S,ir: Enclosed please find your copy of the document (s) recorded with King County Records and on file with the City Clerk's Office of Renton. • Very truly yours CITY OF RENTON 00fi /''t-u y ui Q. //,i1A Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM/`db sc Enc ( 1. ) OF RA, 41 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U ,$ ® Z • MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • nINIL fl=111 rn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD CITY CLERK 0,9gT�D SEP1E40• • April 24, 1980 Donna Nolan 139 NE e53rd Seattle, WA 98101; • Re: Recorded documents - Restrictive Covenant • Dear Sir: Enclosed please find your copy of the document (s) recorded with King County' Records and on file with the City Clerk's Office of Renton. • Very truly yours CITY OF RENTON oelh7/4i Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM/dli sc Enc ( 1 ) 1 For.Use By City //Clerk's Office Only A. I . # 6 ` AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING = =-ASS = SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of April 7, 1980 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. R-002-80; Mrs. Arthur Beale Consent X (G to B-1 and R-3) Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session A. Hearing Examiner Report, 3-6-80 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/AX COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval sublect Finance Dept. Yes No. N/AX Other Clearance to restrictive covenants. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and -effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced rezone application was published on March 6, 1980, and an appeal period established to expire on March 20, 1980. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council members following the seven day period from the date of publication, and will be scheduled on the City Council agenda for April 7, 1980 (unless reconsidered or appealed) for referral to Ways and Means Committee for adoption of an ordinance. �''\ v " • PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: i'-- Q{I�¢��,--��--� , ' r, R �rul�"� cti 5� See page 3 of the attached report. ` J CLEWS OFFIG ;r SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. f 7 Arthur Beale 1_ .-.l-80 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Arthur R. Beale and his wife Dorothy M. Beale, and Donna R. Nolan, as her separate estate, are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: That portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Wa, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision; thence north 89-24-22 east along the northerly line there of 372.37 feet; thence south 1-10-21 east 534.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 1-10-21 east 498.16 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of primary state highway #2; thence westerly along said northerly line to the easterly line of the westerly 30 feet in width of said subdivision; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning; thence north 89-24-22 east parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision 340.37 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT road. WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: LANDSCAPE BUFFERS It shall be the responsibility of the owners of the property to install and maintain a 20-foot landscape buffer and fence along the north property line, and to install and maintain a 15-foot landscape buffer and fence along the east property line. Honeydew Creek shall be preserved and incorporated into any development plans for the property. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. 1 ;Ic- t • Arthur R. Beale Dorothy M. 'Beale STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING _ ) . Page One of Two A 1 O On this day of , 19 ` ' , before me personally appeared Arthur R. Beale and his wife Dorothy M. Beale, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. t, 'vj Notary Public in and for the.tState of. Washington, residing in ti•'v�i 'f fly Donna R. No an, as her separate estate STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING, On this day of 19 before me personally appeared Donna R. Nolan, the person who executed the within and foregoing instrument,.and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my and and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Publi in and for the S' - of Washington, residing in i ,/��%� Page Two of Two OF R� • 4$ THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 09.47, 0 SEP1°�P March 21, 1980 Mr. Dick Kloppenburg Key West Development Corp. 18000 Pacific Highway South, Suite 1117 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: File No. R-002-80; Mrs. Arthur Beale Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Kloppenburg: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted in the Examiner's report of March 6, 1980, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sincerely, -VtAS .\Gt.4 Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk 41. OF 124, THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 saa n ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER o Q FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235 -2593 11 SEP�00 Man'h 1'�, .l''R0 • Mr. John E. Phillips Hillis, Phillips, Cri.irn: IOss, Clark and Martin 403 Columbia Street Seattle, WA 98104 • • Dear Mr. Phillips: • • Enclosed is the declaration.of restrictive covenants which was required • as a condition of approval of the Beale rezone, File No. R-002-80. I would appreciate. return of the document as soon as Mrs. Nolan .has • signed so that I may forward it to Mr. Dobson, Mr. and Mrs. Beale's attorney. Sincerely, , Marilyn J.'"Petersen Hearing Adm. Asst. • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Arthur R. Beale and his wife Dorothy M. Beale, and Donna R. Nolan, as her separate estate, are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: That portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Wa, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision; thence north 89-24-22 east along the northerly line there of 372.37 feet; thence south 1-10-21 east 534.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 1-10-21 east 498.16 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of primary state highway #2; thence westerly along said northerly line to the easterly line of the • westerly 30 feet in width of said subdivision; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning; thence north 89-24-22 east parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision 340.37 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT road. • WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: LANDSCAPE BUFFERS It shall be the responsibility of the owners of the property to install and maintain a 20-foot landscape buffer and fence along the north property line, and to install and maintain a 15-foot landscape buffer and fence along the east property, line. Honeydew Creek shall be preserved and incorporated into any development plans for the property. DURATION • These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of .the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation: Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as"a judgment in such action. Arthur• R. Beale Dorothy M. Beale STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING Page One of Two %J • On this day of 19 , before me personally appeared Arthur R. Beale and his wife Dorothy M. Beale, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State • of Washington, residing in Donna R. Nolan, as her separate estate STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING • On this • day of 19 , before me personally appeared Donna R. Nolan, the person who'executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said' instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. • Notary Public in and for the'State of Washington, residing in • Page Two of Two / Fc. .;,se .By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING LOldBusiness asaxa =SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner Of April 7, 1980(Meeting Date)Staff Contact Maril n Petersen (Name) tus:SUBJECT: File No. R-002-80; Mrs. Arthur Bealent X(G to B-1 and R-3) c Hearingspondencence/Resolution XusinessExhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)AttachusinessSessionA. Hearing Examiner Report, 3-6-80 B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes_ No N/AX COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval subiect Finance Dept. Yes No. N/AX to restrictive covenants. Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount Appropriation- Budgeted $ Transfer Required SUMMARY. (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced rezone application was published on March 6, 1980, and an appeal period established to expire on March 20, 1980. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council members following the seven day period from the date of publication, and will be scheduled on the City Council agenda for April 7, 1980 (unless reconsidered or appealed) for referral to Ways and Means Committee for adoption of an ordinance. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 3 of the attached report. • SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 6th day of March , 1980 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this � Ziay of ��-e�✓ IWO . . e�2v Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Mrs. Arthur Beale; R-002-80 (The n nwte4 contain a £L&t o6 the patties, of necond) q 1• March 6, 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER • • CITY OF RENTON . • • • REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, APPLICANT: Mrs. Arthur Beale FILE NO. R-002-80 LOCATION: Vicinity of 1320 Union Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: . The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G to B-1 and R-3 districts for future development of retail and . service shops and a professional office center. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to restrictive covenants. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary. report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on Friday, February 22, 1980. • • PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, 'examining • available information on file with the application, and field 'checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: , '. The hearing was.opened on February 26, 1980 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the :) Renton Municipal Building. . . ;. 'Parties wishing to testify 'were affirmed by the Examiner. r ? ;It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Steve Munson, Planning Department, reviewed qjthe Planning Department report and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1: Application File including staff report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Site Plan as submitted Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map Exhibit #4: Land Use Map for surrounding vicinity Mr. Munson corrected the word "northeasterly" in Section D.5 of the report, second line, to "northwesterly. " The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Dick Kloppenburg Key West Development Corporation 18000 Pacific Highway South, Suite 1117 Seattle, WA 98188 • . The Examiner requested clarification of the applicant's intent in requesting an R-3 zoning designation for the northerly quarter of the property in lieu of B-1 zoning for proposed commercial purposes on the site. Mr. Kloppenburg advised that due to the proposed use : consisting of a professional office facility in that location, the R-3 zoning district was • , determined, to, be most compatible with intended development,and surrounding land use. The,Examiner advised receipt of. a letter from Lawrence B. Wood, 1155 Shelton N.E. , dated February 26, 1980, which included objections to a rezone of the northern portion of the • 'site for multifamily residential development due to inadequate capacity of the sewer system in the area. Mr: Kloppenburg was given the opportunity to read the letter. The Examiner requested.further comments in support or opposition 'to the request. There was .no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department staff. . Since there were no further comments, the hearing regarding File No. R-002-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:25 a.m. 7 R-002-80 Page Two FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this ma ter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: • 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of +3.74 acres of propert, from G (General; Single Family Residential; minimum lot size 35,000 square feet) zone to B-1 (Business/Commercial) zone and R-3 (Medium Density Multiple Family Residential) . 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies a d provisions, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is entered as Exhibit •1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Envi' onmental Policy Act of 1971; R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Signiricance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. • 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected .y the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6. The subject property was annexed into the city in March of 1969 and the current designation of G was applied to the property at that time. • 7. The subject site has a moderate slope of about 4% from the south to the nor h. An existing single family residence is located. near the center of the site. he site is covered predominantly with scrub brush, some some junipers and evergreens cattered over the site, Honeydew Creek flows across the southern portion of the pr.perty. 8. The subject site is on the northeast corner of Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Union Avenue N.E. in the vicinity of 1320 Union Avenue N.E. 9. There are a variety of zoning districts in the vicinity of the subject site. North of. the subject site G zoning continues and there is an R-2 (Duplex Residential) district. There is another R-2 district east of the subject site. South and west of the subject site is a B-1 district and an R-3 district is northwest of t e' site. 10. A mixture of single family, multiple family and commercial uses surround t e subject site. There are two large developed single family residential areas located in the vicinity of the subject site; one is due north of the site centered at N.E. 19th Street and Union Avenue N.E., and the other is south, centered on N.E. 10t Street at Union Avenue N.E. 11. While the Comprehensive Plan for this area was reviewed in 1976, no change was made in the designation of the subject site for commercial usage on the south p.rtion of the site along Sunset or medium density multifamily uses on the north portion. 12. Rezones in the area in the recent past include the property immediately adjacent on the east which was rezoned from G-7200 (General; Single Family Residential; minimum lot size 7200 square feet) to R-2 in 1975 and a parcel 1/4 mile east on th= northwest corner of Sunset and Anacortes which was rezoned from G to B-1 and R=3. 13. There has been recent building activity in the area with the construction •f the Ernst-Malmo Shopping Center, Forestbrook Condominiums and McDonald's. 14. The uses immediately north of the subject site are presently single family, and the 'Planning Department recommends that they be buffered from the proposed medium density multifamily development by 20 feet of landscaping and a fence. Liiewise, the use to. the east is a low density duplex condominium development and th. Planning Department recommends that 15 feet of• landscaping and a fence be 'nstalled at that property .line to protect the site from the potential commercial de elopment. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proponent of a reclassification must demonstrate that the request is i the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in S=ction 4-3014 which provides in part that: . • • a. The subject site has not 'been considered in a previous area wide rezon= or land use analysis; or . b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification .er the Comprehensive Plan; or ' S ' R-002-80 Page Three c. There has been demonstrated change in the development pattern in the area since the last rezoning action. The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria has been 'met to permit the reclassification of the subject property. 2. The Comprehensive Plan was re-evaluated in 1976 and the area was once again designated for B-1 and R-3 uses proposed by the applicant in the requested rezone. In addition; the shopping center will be compatible with the Comprehensive Plan goal of providing "minor retail centers or neighborhood shopping districts. . .near . the perimeters of several neighborhoods and at the intersection of major roads and arterials. " (Page 11, Comprehensive Plan, 1965) • 3. The zoning category of the subject site (G) has not been changed since it was annexed into the city. in 1969 and the requested change to B-1 and R-3 is compatible with'not, only the Comprehensive Plan but other zoning in the area and current • development in the area. 4. 'There has been considerable'development in the area since 1969 in the form of both . new corflmercial and large expanses of residential development. The B-1 reclassification would serve the growing needs for neighborhood shopping as a result of growth in this area. ' 5. The north•portion of the subject property will be designated. for. R-3, and the applicant has proposed constructing professional offices (subject to a special permit approval) • on, the site. The site though is suitable for the development of medium density multifamily housing. Adjacent uses consist of low density multifamily east and multifamily condominium development west of this portion of the site. 6. The screening the Planning Department has recommended will enable the developed ' uses to blend in with the surrounding uses. The northern single family uses will also be protected by this buffer. The rezone will not cause any detriment to' the general public or impair the health, safety or welfare of neighboring properties. . 7. Preserving the natural amenities Of various parcels is a major goal of the Compre- hensive Plan, and Honeydew Creek should.be preserved in any subsequent development. RECOMMENDATION: • The City Council should reclassify the 300 feet of the subject property northerly of Sunset Boulevard N.E. to B=1, and the remainder of the subject property to R-3 subject to: • 1. The execution of restrictive covenants to install and maintain a 20-foot landscape buffer and fence along the north property line, and a 15-foot landscape buffer' and fence along the east property line and to preserve Honeydew Creek and incorporate it into any subsequent development plans; and 2. Review' of site development plans by the Hearing Examiner prior to the issuance of building permits 'for any subsequent development. • ORDERED THIS 6th day of March, 1980. • • \GAA.Ir, Fred J. K fman Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of March, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: ' Dick Kloppenburg, Key West. Development Corp. , 18000 Pacific Highway South, Suite 1117, Seattle, WA 98188 Mrs. Arthur Beale, 4325 Sunset Boulevard N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Barbara Schellert, 3506 Park Avenue N. , Renton, ,WA 98055 Larry Brown, Western Pacific Properties, 2112 3rd Ave. , Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98121 _ v R-002-80 Page Four TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of March, 1980 to the following: • Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch ' Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for recorisiderati•n must be filed in writing on or before March 20,. 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling teat the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably avai able at the' prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within :ourteen (14) days from the date, of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set for■h the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requ'res that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee o.f. $25.00 an* meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspe.tion in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cast in said department. * • ' ' . . • . • , . - .. Willainr.M10••••1 A • • • 3 I, - A ' i • . .. T.... '.• ' A •• - • • . A A ; ....:0 Iwo :-...1•‘.../ •••110.1, Z.! . •4•i 3 a,..p ., =., , :• . • . , • . i iiA '4_ • 'i ,...., . • b ‘..‘ g„-.1 ,. / ,......4. , • 3 a ..;.J1 ‘,-1 .1 . ., ..: '.,. , , , . . , - .. ..,:,.. .'..i.:. •:•,....,-,... ,i...„..a..,,,....,......„...:4...3 ••. .... - A, •'-'.3‘A''. 3 • i t,,e 'I PC. e. . ' • '.:! 3 1 C.; •••••79 4'71 el r;., , , , ,.,..,. • : s . I .- •...).,'.4,f ..5?-1,..,ki ', '. . ."-e... ' P• • I . • , .. , e . .f.4 4 , (..)• i• ' 3., . . , I 1 ' ' ' I • a . . - .”...•2....-..,.•,'..••• •.;,,•.,„•I 1 11..4-c.'-;'i.,--.'-'".4 i . • , . . , . ;ng''.•;.... '•‘.4,,) ,,' ,..,..,kr........, • • !p.,.......•....-.....,.......,,,,, • , • .. - e‘'..v..,• .• . ".`....1..,-.'-;.j.6 ,ci,-411.'..,:k"'s.,;14'•;\-1 \ \,, .'•,I,•'. -:••-',---,',.-. ...• .- . a . 6 1 .. i - . - .0:::: .... ... .• •-......- 1 • ..,- ••?,..:,., -•- .., I ,: .., . ,,,,..!....i . .e A ,,y..,,,,.,:: 4..ye1:.., ..,4y ‘,....,e.;te e,f -, \ -• ts • i• '1‘ 41-...•(::••••‘144.1t. . I • •F , ,./ '• .1 ' '. ..,:• 1 ' . . 14 I l'I•• PC. .•-• bilez1 0....,,,••••;%i••.;',4”,‘•;,' ,.., 0,..,c,,;NI,,-,,,,.,\1.,IN. 4 ; t• .-'.. - , . _-,. i - Q - .1'- '. 1. '.. • • If.,i. ---"--r:';':--'-.-7-- '-' .• .-*Jr\''''\:-• ''\-II 5 . -...:.q--i,;:.1,=4..t.d..,..=.4=12..m....-- 14.12.•••.4-.• . L -.....:--L4, ,, 4,•,.,. =•••..-•-:,,-71,. 4-',Clint',n4i ;:t.;:t;••:4•7 via.ova, r-ii 4 • . • E . --..• ' • c I i • ("2n q iL 1 , • . ... , ! . , , I '• . .6..,,,, ?'...,...:1•4: :: . , r . . „., x.,... , . . . 4aP CS'...•-117.--77--• . --... . 'I '• .• . ,:s.17:4As '*-••••... ii 11 vi i--- . ' ,t) 1____• I -,G . Ro .••if, jit4V4k.t)t 1. , / . A. 1 414'• • Caa.1 1. . . ' . I , .:vi--.4 -,tr',J. :. „, `• •-•-.-L .%,,,.. .,, • eA (Pk - '.h.i?, • .., . - p,, . V. L f . . .. , , •so.*.....o.•• ' ,N:....; .1 _ ' •..I. i . _.i_51 ...„ za. .;; ; i .. • ;c!.....: 7, . . 6 sc: ‘.- .-..,•• 34 .1 r/ • .... • ili', , N '..44.'• r'.? '1..1, ' r-.2- . i „.„., . . .g. . („.„ ,, I .,., . '. '>1.i--- •,:3---% L'crzs.-c-a.ar.::g....nt•A . 0 0----11-t're.,-.'..:‘ ,..•.:, • • •; :memiz.fr,...;timtribaT.,.••••--Tri i-• .'••r ,.' .! --81 7 r 1 ..,:.:1-,,:.,'`,,.41: t .- - ,,...• ._.,...,' r-- . . 0 . : , 1 :,,,, , . , "...-t_p .-. , •, , _. ..,. , ,..,,,,..,...„ _ 4 Roo.,6.1',., i I , :., ,A-il.mmxtmacarta..--Izaz- F77.7p.'I . 7.. :, . ,,,...-_---..r, s , •, ,,„...4„,..,,, , .. ._ _•. . .,,.......,..................."."..,,• ...,,-: ..,...,,,,,,,. , .,..,_. ...,..,,'.: r•„,,„; ,zr-;,• 1 . , :ii ii.,.....!..,.::,....E,,,;_ ;_:, ,:::,•.,.. . : r,, . •.7-1--: 12_4..„ -,' .ko, T.,r5,-....;;...,...1 ,....,..T.,,..... .,. .--,..... ....:-...,..;,4, ... , '..77:,:4\,;,,..• ..L1 ,...-ii.:._,. , ! ... •..t_ ,,..k -1,,,,,,a,.y....le,-..-i , •:1,./alk,\.!' ',.,,I..• , • .7_ .. ; 'A !"4•Le-Ji t iv t.a71,7„i-"?,;-. L. V',,...{1,12_1 .5,pk.„7`s•- '4-7 y-i; 1.1..4 5 r ., .5 ,,i• P3 <.1,•.,4 ' .;:,:i . . • i1 `.- ,.1 !.,.,.0.1,•;,,.. ._. , , - ..•_4(.1-.1 .\ _41.441 , -- •c..41:i.-", '...c.il.;;',(' '7-7." .4'. r. ,4 1 ''•''' ".1A.--. ',..,1:4:4;'," •*t'-' )(t,li i y'0,t..-.r •. ,..',-.'-:' 2 1 c . If 'i.`;• '"•''''i'-*-•-:---'1..•',42;-,1"- . ."'" 4:l',1•Zi .„).1'7:•-__.'.4:1-•,•'.11.9:01 ;s•:i'T.:70..5-.1.W'7'54 q'•••• .4:..1,;i..(2.'.,:::•.i . ••, .. •,/ Itii:-....1;_-:4•;i1::-..k... .:•;-.4,. .......a. 1 !.$:;'.•1, ,,c:_.2...••:', :,. --', ,:i4.r.-`• ,,,,J ' i 0.• ;.:-....-i-".". ._•1::;g' !•:•:..t L . • ...it- ! A 1:41...;.. .1 7 e. N.. .J.t 4.-.4-r•;.. -. . . ',1,'-'1i4sati. ' .4:-, •144... ;2 4, -1:.1,"•-•4 0 --- , •1 .&., '---- ..-- , .7'4. ';.7:•.L•••. ..; 1 - ,. • ,1; 1,'.. : , . „ , ;1 : - • ri .. . .; . . ' ir, 1,•).1 , .. -,-- \ ..,,.• .r. ..1 . ..... Si I'+. ••."'..., . . ., , 1.1 e i,,, '4,4 r..‘• ' e's' , •-:;11'7-474,d'...'z.,..7.t.,:.-'7' •--- • '' I Ili 4 :4 , 1 . • '4...,;;••47. 1:.' ! •1,•q , ., .-..••• - ,....;•1.,..,,::,-.:::;.;!/..-.:;.,..1.,• ., . • la,.41.1.'• ' • *.'..''.'-...' 2. ...1.1._,..."--.-1*.)... ' ,, •-.. ' , I';', I . . . • • ',1 " ' • .' • ' ' ' ' .....;.::••'.' . , . .' • • - f . . • : -... -. •1 .• c ..••• .. • , ,,,,,t,:1:-.T.,:.T. ..,r.,:!.-...,1-1-'•7.'9 I. rl : I . . : •:..P .1"•'7.''".'!'. .] ‘,1;:e....X)A''..-7'V''.....e"'i.;*,..6 7:i.,'4.0 !C.,rt.) i ); • 1 , _ . - . '",.. ,.••••••••,---,, •. ,- , •,... . •- , ; -.• ••.." (.. • • - .;IA ,-, ,, ,,,,-, 4 1 1, • ,• i.1 ! .. .I,•;! .1., t '4,4 ck,C'-'4.,,-; ).` ''''. - f' . - , ' , ,,. ,',Z,.....,.....-.--.4•. :-..•,..Li.. . . ....',••;,,.':';. ?,:,.... '1 : 'A ,,,,,...,-.,....,.....,-,if...5M,,.11,5,1515,71 k4t, a-, ' 114C'T32. 745:!. :.L1 ':.i• •44...1: 1 r'' • r 1,....1 . A,.,- ,..: ,. .•: 5'17 .1 4. ".. ; • _ , .. ti. '• :,'1 k:Li.ati:-..;;-. ....;..i'..'.:. -.J `..'.:.7.t.: z•*:'I c'f'-:,:tzt'z..•I 1 r t7.1 r...."...'57:-..1.PI .1 • . • . ...„. ..... . .. .. .... ... - ... - . . . acurargal . .. . .. ' . , . . . . • MRS. ARTHUR BEALE . . R-002-80 . , • • . . .• . . . .. . . .. . . . . , .. . .. . . . , • . , . . . ..-... - . .. .. • . . . . . . . . . . .. • . . . . I . . • • • APPLICANT MRS ARTHUR BEALE .. TOTAL AREA t 8. 74 acres • . • • Via -Union Avenue NE and Sunset Blvd NE . .. . PRINCIPAL ACCESS . . . . 4 • . . , . "G" , General Classification District • t. EXISTING ZONING. , . . . . . .•. ... . . . . . .. . . ,. . - ' ' • ''' - EXISTING USE S remainder • One single family residence in center, , . ., - . . . .•• :. undeveloped . . , • . . . . • .•. • , , . . . . . . . . , PROPOSED USE -Future development of retail and service shops . • • . . . ' • ' ...-- 7 ., .. . • , ,•, ' ' •' •.,,... -.. ., aiid ....r- profesiod'al. .of f ice, eclu Lei-. . . . , • • Commercial , Medium Density Multiple '4.•,..,(•, ‘:•.. . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE',PLAN . . . . . . . COMMENTS -. . ... . . - .. ; ., ..., . • , • • , . . • , .. . . • • • . • • . ., . , . . . . , . . . • . , • . . . . , . ..• ., , . . • . . . ". "-• • . - • . ... -.. ,.., • .,- . . . . , , ,.. : . . . , . • . . . . . . . . . . , . ,, • • . . •, . " . • .. . . . .•. .• '..j'1•::,, '• . .. ' • . . . . . • ,'','..t.'?;.'' ..:7• ' . , . , . . . . . . . . . .. . • • • • . • . . . . , ... • •• . . , . . ., RECEIVED . "'- CITY OF RENTON HEARING'EXAMINER FEB 261980 PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM 7,R,9,10,11,12,1,2,3,4,5,6 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 1I1HIEE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 EXHIBIT No. 1 APPLICANT : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE ITEM �T FILE NUMBER : R-002-80 NO.O. - ^- - ° A . SUMMARY RY PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from 1PG" to B-1 and R-3 for future development of retail and service shops and a professional office center . B . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : ' ARTHUR R . BEALE & DONNA R . NOLAN 2 . Applicant : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE 3 . Location : (Vicinity Map Attached ) Vicinity of 1320 Union Avenue N .E . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . 5 . Size of Property : f 3 ,74 acres 6 . Access : Via Union Avenue N . E . and Sunset Blvd . N .E . 7 . Existing Zoning : "G" , General Classi- fication District ; minimum lot size 359000 square feet 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : G-72009 Residence Single Family ; R-2 , Residence Two Family ; R-39 Residence Multiple Family ; B-1 , Business Use 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial, Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on February 13 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near • the site as required by City ordinance on February 15 , 1980 . - M • PLANNING DEPARTMENT • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , R-002-80 FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 PAGE TWO C . IHl1IST®IRY7/I:/A(CKGROEI B : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2472 of March 28 , 1969 at which time the present zoning classification was applied . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: • 1 . Topography : The subject site rises slightly from south to north at approximately a 4% grade . 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Peemeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development . Ragnar-Indianol : association , sloping (RdC) . Permeability is moderately rapid inthe upper part of this soil and rapid in the substratum . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate . These soils are used for timber . 3 . Vegetation : Scrub brush is the dominant feature with a few junipers and some scattered evergreens . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide some habi,ta:. for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : Honey Creek flows across the southerly w�sfi portion of the property in a southeasterly-northcasteily direction . 6 . Land Use : An older vacant single family residence is located near the center of the subject site with the remainder undeveloped . E , NEIGHBORHOOD RHHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties consist of a mixture of single • family , multiple family and light commercial uses . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : 121° water mains are located along Union Avenue N .E . and Sunset Blvd . N .E . An 8" sanitary sewer extends east-west on Sunset Blvd . near the east end of the subject site - and second:_ 8" sewer runs north-south on Union Avenue on the south side of Sunset Blvd . In addition , the Sunset lift station is located adjacent to the subjec.. site on Sunset Blvd . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Departme t as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue N .E . at N . E . 12th- Street within 500 ' to the south of the subject site . 4. Schools : The subject site is within 1/2 mile of the Honeydew and Sierra Heights Elementary Schools and within 1-1/2 miles of McKnight Junior High School and within 1/2 mile of Hazen Senior High School . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC. HEARING : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , R-002-80 FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 PAGE THREE 5 . Recreation : The subject site is within 1/2 mile of Kiwanis Park to the south and within on mile of the proposed King County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary Schools G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF TIHUE ZONING CODE: , 1 . Section 4-729(C ) , General Classification District . 2 . Section 4--709 (A) , R-3 , Residence Multiple Family . 3 . Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business District . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER ' OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , pages 17-18 , Objectives . 2 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 5 , #2 , Community . I . IInpACT OF 'THE NATURAL AL OR iHILUI'ilAf l ENVIRONMENT : : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will ' not have a direct effect on the property . However , subsequent development will remove the vegetation , disturb the soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures , however , these impacts can be mitigated , 2 . Population/Employment : Future development of the subject site would provide some increased employment opportunities for area residents and others . • 3 . Schools : Schools:lshouid not be significantly impacted . Future development of the site may , however , result in increased use by students of the nearby schpols . 4 . Social : The proposed rezone to commercial and medium density multiple family would provide for those activities associated with business and professional office uses . Opportunities for social interaction would then result . 5 . Traffic : Although the level of traffic would increase , the exact amount would be better addressed at the time of specific site development . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been prepared by the responsible official . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : CTED : 1 . . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utlities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , 002-80 FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 PAGE FOUR L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT EN T ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed rezone to B-1 and R-3 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designations of commercial and medium density multiple family • for the subject site . • 2 . The proposed retail shops and related commercial uses together with the planned professional office • structures would be compatible with each other and consistent with uses allowed in the B-1 and R-3 zones by the City ' s Zoning Code if a special permit were granted for the professional offices . 3 . The subject site was part of the general area included for review of the Comprehensive Plan in 1976 although the site itself was not amended and the zoning classifi- cation has remained the same since annexation . (Section 4-3014-A ) , 4 . On July 28 , 1975 the parcel of property adjacent to the east was rezoned from G-7200 to R-2 (CHG International ) and on April 27 , 1979 the northwest corner of Sunset Blvd . NE and Anacortes Avenue NE (approximately 1/4 mile east ) was rezoned from "G" to B-1 and R-3 (Althoff) . 5 . The land use designation of commercial for the souther' , 3/4 ' s of the property appears to be consistent with policy statements of the Comprehensive Plan including "Minor retail centers or neighborhood shopping district. • commonly will be located near the perimeters of several neighrbohoods and at the intersection of major roads and arterials . In contrast with the ,major shopping-districts which provide comparison shopping , the neighborhood shopping centers should serve as convenient outlets for a limited number of goods and services . Such locations will normally contain grocery , drug and hardward stores , restaurants , and other related shops and personal services . " The medium density multiple family designation for • the northerly 1/4 would also seem to be consistent with the policy statement of "In medium and high density residential use districts --- other compatible uses may include --- shopping districts and other functions which are not detrimental to the maintenance of desirable living conditions . " (Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , Page 11 ) . 6 . Fire hydrants and access shall be installed and made serviceable prior to any building : ponstruction and water main installation shall be as per water engineering requirements as advised by the Fire Department , A pre-construction conference will also be required with the Fire Marshall . See other comments . • 7 . Utilities Engineering notes that a latecomer ' s agree- ment for water on Sunset Blvd . NE will be required • and that standard hookup fees for water and sewer will apply . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , R-002-80 FEBRUARY 262 1980 PAGE FIVE ' 8 . The conceptual site plan with proposed structures . appears to be compatible with the adjacent land uses . In order to emphasize the intertie between commercial uses and the professional office buildings , the proposed B-1 zoning of the subject site should require specific site plan approval prior to the . issuance of building permits . This will help insure consistency with any future Special Permit provisions that might be required for professional office buildings in the R-3 zone as proposed . 9 . The existing land uses adjacent to the subject site create a situation where buffering of the propose-i uses on the site are required . The low density multiple family to the east of the site is in the form of condo- miniums . These condominiums should be buffered with a landscaping area of at least 15 feet . To the north of the site the area is presently occupied by single family residences . Even though this area to the north is desig- nated for potential medium density residential , the exist- ing single family. residences should be buffered with a 20-foot landscaping strip . Both of these landscaping areas on the north and east could require the addition • of a fence to provide the separation . The exactiiarchitectural elevations of the proposed build- ings in both the B-1 and R-3 portions of the subject site could have a substantial impact on the adjacent residential uses as a result of their height . Any further site plan reviews of the subject site should pay particular concern to the number of stories and the architectural treatment of the buildings . 10 . The traffic situation cannot be analyzed at this point without an exact knowledge of the future development of the site . The commercial development could result in either light or heavy, traffic patterns at various times during the day . Therefore , the environmental review at the time of site plan review would be critical . In addition, the option of the R-3 property could range from either approximately 25 apartment units to the con- struction of a professional office building , if a special permit were granted . This would have . a different effect on the traffic generation of the site . It would also modify the impact on the single family land uses to the north . M. DEPARTMENTAL.RTMENNTAIL. RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the above analysis , 'recommend approval .of the requested rezone subject to : • 1 . Installation and operation of fire hydrants , water mains , and access as per Fire Department comments . 2 . Execution of the latecomers agreement for water and payment of standard hookup fees for water and sewer as per Utilities Engineering comment . 3 . Site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner for development of the entire subject site due to potential impacts on th.: existing uses to the north and east . 4 . The filing of restrictive covenants to establish a 1.5-foot wide landscaping strip on the eastern property boundary and 20 feet on the northern property boundary . c. 1) a•. e w, e i, .1 Y F {" .il' _.•D t. z' •` • l T. °rim c♦ 4..- 11.t- i/ .! 1 'r_._ _ 5], ��....__o�t t�•_' 8 T::�ta.t._.�a_1C_.. • ,'c, 1 13 T: I a %5 , t-f-t-r' i �; 0 S amar». i, �' x� .'_y•_t��z �- -_ ,�,'. .L,_ a� •`-i'7�r` f`.'l :l ism._-.1. C"i,� �� r C il ,fi e r'-zA_-1" `.. 't,d'., • • 4/,,, ro : ,.' L..- +:4 ....:". a g I - .- •'Q,' « . 'I I Ll�� 6 I _ 1•, li v�gsalw,:./ns-� 1,,A — 4zhau `�Cz !%a'.°-=a:c�a-mot mrrm�.�, .a6 ,, : I1. a 4 e. ' J f` t 3 �V 3. ry c�L:.;,c:7•-'tF n 3 • j �_ .,_.:z `'0l 8 1 J La '1.5' ,• •'i` %-,f tt, '-v�e'-,;?1" \ \ `aSw B� 0'-: f -,a,^1^fl 1 1 ' Q ';,I.,•_ n, >Y;-I;T.s'S? .•`� ''f 5� z�' p� .�.. n'. , , ,, I a �,i�ca d�.%.. 9 r 3 4 ,o�'P'� •L� 4 1'=•' o j y t` �°,,�1� ';tis;,;;;-,-,, u ' i.. '.` 0;;-3 - .,_t., uNLaz ,.1°°i.,•rls'.1— t, :::,zt,,3._''\b Y U cc�-_-' 'w^' w-x-7.—.L.1....,......1 _ t • •wo,„.a.7,,„'-----.,,, .....•:7'.ti-:;rs .?.tom c o .n ,I,s ,'„•cl„,spa - 1•• __9 r 1 �r+ to a,, ,,,:a a- �_. +[yI P � Cam[, f.'' I y :" " �!3 ' �'rg it !, py t: t .G ee!! �, u•,D }11 r" i a.., `7ri / ._.. rD J,._ t, �.AI'y p1 �y° 'v�m,�.� Id c.rJ i:34t1.,J t , • (yJ 1' , '' 1 �` ' fig,/.',- ® £ t ) inb L,-.z (1,,L,, '+..;a t} ,.' ` `Y yJ _ f/' L� � 6 p, a'b/ (! ��1. / .s',f A � - n1 Fx;.r I ' T 1..996 if g•} �41 . .w 4� r'� Via,' `� 11 • a'�"�tii tiT`, he ist• fi',j a%-" °. `-{i•••,-°°m.y.,.g � r ..� �f.�,�+ j I i ... ii :i aF 9 .� • H� -4) 6 d .I di- o J� 1 a . ;. ii .,,._i„, ..-L11, tfw 1 ' —__.... _ _ 1 v:s>�,. ,t r_—�r v q .�'"� nl �l Q`" y _ �tl� 4��'"��-- .- - LL,;:�.�,-..�.----- _�:xr� ^^•sr e"'•. yy� •1 y+ Q^ - Qua i t�� J 1c- <awn.- 0 "�j>!, I,J�[L� "a.. � �...x t - 5 �_ c L e_- .{�yl s;;�c'= 0 , „ • t !--12::-. .a• t :A. , �. -t��-'' . i• --t• .`�s j��'•:• 'r-'-2r?ts�• a: i+ '.t, ,. :fCa- a; ;•-W• N,•ILG,•'' U�i9 ��I� ',�\�of ,t,.ry;l''• , a Q ,'-! .L < t 1 d ''',:\ \, .9�`�_ '� it i tea-+u n u. ;IX' • .t t I I '.{fF • r-s s 1✓ti c'1�6,�.11,.-'`-rY'"' ` .`3„ pi,,.. \T-+ •. Tti i 12 kg • ;: �' ry°c ems.c'tt.---��--�7 ,.}.• . .4.-- .,,., -.Y p 2,,?,,>•` '\.0 •? .,,. r ,M,y t\ , , - g '' •(l°'� i, t�'�i.i�- '.�.�I+y'� I I s ``-',::�+�v`�S•5 3�-W,,,��,` ,`�?�'�• ..„Tl�'"a.WS ,, , 1 ;/ I °'N•E-:it-- • .-- '"&L'. 1- j t+C-� I•kn 2-°. _.Z z IrT e �.,�a _ 1 0 3• iCrT�7 sp} '� '• Ilr_ .m n s ad;-,-j• ; IL :Is,.l� ;g•r.°19I,a it '' I I..• —sin'. ; � -� �• _,< ,Ft. J z.?�1?t"I' �a�'J�a. .�N _,TM�,.i..I. . fl I. -I CS v:�sx{{ -y, fix^-^• F•er rrr=n..,,.,,..,YV.'m_ It .€I,4 7 •• a c:a etae c-s: e=v°an rsa wn 1 i t1• 5 • ..-JF:;��' .� •i'F i•,•I*�Y 1 , ' -r r�.mIt_ _ ! i . A,tl �� j-.:�4 1 , 1_II� +'rvf•^'-;} 1`:� i Z '�•'- 4oma��d •n i-:{ ' . �� h rST. • i 7 , a., lift,` sit: p.m•�a t.:a•� 9 r. i _,t, _�_'L.'k:L11N 1- L'I�i I•,�C'Ip*L°L1.'l ,l i_t�i, I ..' '1 •:c _ Fpp { I i „�,•`.'' • t1 7' 1 r[ff1/, .31;I ) G i° :iT `I , se....e°'-d.^ ......o.........._. �.. -.a,.�..m-... =1 ^ . I .'-'• -�a� , •,� 't'.... b I >ti^...s..y....-. a,.,zc.x...... .,...,..savor._ i •� - ..i---_..•2' - ?,-.tY'. -i,"�• ~' '.;..,{ rir._. I __y[G(��'�"-�`� C` �*;� a kj �� , -f a �'• "."�tlL�-1� ,J'co-_ ,i' °...:ti y �_ jd z..m- ,• '�+ Fy{,'�...,3 4i F} 5 u. • N MRS . ARTHUR BEALE R-002-80 APPLICANT MRS . ARTHUR BEALE TOTAL AREA + 3. 74 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Union Avenue NE and Sunset Blvd NE EXISTING ZONING "G" , General Classification District EXISTING USE One single family residence in center, remainder undeveloped PROPOSED USE Future development of retail and service shops and .� pY°cfessional office cei Ler. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial, Medium Density Multiple Family• . COMMENTS11 • s , • 1 Renton Planning Departmen • DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET - . - , 11,----H ,,,, r...) 1 ,,,,° n :?, ,.., • A 13 p 1 i cat i on : eciF.,_:7-'424./E16q. 2/72-S6) ro i 0 0-/ - IA,-___-_, ------- _7.7 1 7 P CP 1 "ji ,, )“.4CPCP" i", i 44,4 , i 1 e 1 4,, e_- t 7 61? ,19 SAar, .- 0, 4;.v ...,,,e ena/ one c L eT-. .-er-c-,p , _ A./r-47Y ° "4 Location : A0.:ei.,river_of hirikcieel 5:1; 5far.-76:-CP - s1" A s...,___ 4° ' ,. /7,0.'1 i wt./0. Applicant :TO Parks Department- r .. y SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :2406a _ • Police Department Ae Re Ce MEETINGLgkV0'0 ' Public Works Department . . ,• . - Engineering Division Traffic Engineering /,. Buiing Division v/ --,--.:5:- yl . \N ,‘ (--"-. /..:,..,,, KS' - 1 _) ' , 1irt7,flities Engineering 1,s0 1 () -2 1. .‘ ' i-- i • .:‘,.._,..) .._..,...„.7 ?-7-- Fire Department . . 4- • • ' \.-71, ..,-, -` / -,,,---.17-::::--""-•-• CO11TN-5 OR sqGusTlos RuARirt16 THIS APL I(AT ION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN dRIIINGFOk 1HE APLICAi101 REVIEW COIFLUCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE MM.. ' IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PlIEAFtE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 500 PM ON _.a/0,2. ),______ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : _ _ •_. Approved v/_Approved with conditions ._. Not Approved tims.7 frIffe'r 6-f raG Ili e., .1 f t Co.0e ,fee c,R ci ria-e:&14.--Pt,f j Forz elc,c•e.,/-0,-)4.•;.2-`7( 72-E- . i4ee.7 i:/1-e- /:71a,/,c1 4:151I7t t 1.??, A-f6-7t-/T5. rht: ,-..-i-iv,0 .4.4e,---e/J6c of-- iz-,,,, ,,,,,- ,49/Q7'.-4: ,4.,..--.4Ff i s.//-Pn•, a givs-rike,,=2,0 Avo Ali)st...-7-4”cien. As- 1eccfedaZei-2 A".,,Y fa .e: ‹..r.m,,,d:,(c. ,.-----,,7?‘.--- /°-/ ,,rx.,,7'..,- 001-4,,f9 A da*IC ,S>W964. 4ef Att.57/9 e-4 d•-e..7 AvaD rkv il r;:e ,..taievzceem,e.e: ..,"7,,e,',-1.7./op(i ,T,Cipe (1001.4"1.(ef,4C 07-/6/Pc., . 62,41776te A-M-0RJ iS 74141...,,C.4 rid:1,- 41 eat: e,,,,<,/,-,(2??7, Lrplag'4.•)‘ &".6,egi f Ale' (er:: u le.57"-" 77S — reZ c.i.70,/t...c76..fc 7;e,'kJ c_--.6,..t-I ---:=6-- /W flee: "iffireckw,.... ---1•*°- 67 • 7 . , • , __. '______.________. . _.4'...;'-‘7,•._,-„_,,,,-;‘,. . / / Signature of Director or 1 9,6thorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV SION: . , z./ Approved ' Approved with conditions Not Approved __ - • . 4!__ ,/itcz_ ,,.& „,,,s,...,.r 6:Luso. ILI c . c . .. / (., Ft L'A FOL._ . °I AZ " . 7 • , oy •5a 1:C 5 6,--/c A.- L-7,‘ iv . 0 1 Su C:C c c t LH: _____ • ) /06-L------ ' . Di re to r o r -Nut lio r i z e-d-Ve—p-i'es en t a t i ye' ----4 • .'' , 213//S`c) Date— . ,• • _ ..,.....„..„ ._ r Renton Planning Departme . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONREVIEW SHEET A p p 1 i c a t i o n :.,...06-5. /V1...',-: ( /4-_-_,Oe.1:2—,(9.6) ____ /J � P +// `� j Cam % r' `S� L �av 7�Y 'c c J� /� c / (.0 c at i 0 tl _l+ ' �l �`? I 4 b)/j 4 i:— ''f f �r _�i 4- �;�°`re,<`'"i£+,.276)::7__y�e'--Ciiems':'%- ) v i /vc- /: r i ti k.,-_ !G p p i i ( ant . �.,'` '( � i,T`'-/.4/ r✓ of L _____ __.__ _ _ __ ._ —____�.>_ TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE ! / ,l' 'co f, Police Department A® Ra Ca FEET INGC�l° °/ec) • _ Public Works Department __'gEngineering Division '7 `+ '1•\ N •- ��Traffic Engineering ., ' i1 1... Building Division i' Utilities Engineering � ,.,....��_.. ' � '�t Via; ..�.. Fire Department "� '�- �,\.< O1 NT. OR SUGGEST 1 S REGARDING THIS I S PP I. 'CATION SHOULD BF PROS I DEIN MUING' 0k 1 - E LICATIOV REVIEW COV ' : = . � N ,1 ' �;!/ � r� AT O.O) AP IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ON E .LNCcRL1��TF YOUR DrPARTME�rvisIaN REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT;N THE ARC., PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE. PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:UO PM ON .�..c;Vf REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:__p.L-.. r • ......it) Approved **Approved with conditions Not Approved TThis rezone woii' d be in the best 7_ni erect ,f ` he area • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative [gate • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : • --_—_ �,. , • _ Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved ' / V • • `! i ) . - lam/ jf •S -giia :ureio -D rectoror Autho—r zc Iiiiiii ----- - Renton Planning Departme DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appi icy tion :A` ?„(2 , ) g61v °, 0 R..' v:Ic1.3 1;;,,... 'e c e ( 4, 61 veil? 'f?4�t=A`41 ,.,e^ a /Ana r- gi oCation : �f�' a� !/ �l tI�c9 y C 9 9'?�;;Se' ¢ ' % / ' •i'/�,, sl Applicant : rcY 11,_ 4vr- - ..._ TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :,_. -R/ /n'.7__. _ Police ice Department A. Re C, NEEi ING c// ___.. Public Works Department ..- Engineering Division Traffic Engineering .I : E3uilding Division _Utilities Engineering Fire Department �Or9�1zI��CNGP° ��G�i-I(r��fI�LIC%��lU�1I 7�VI�1dSC0��1:1�[��C�U� S�IUU�:I) }}�F PROVIDED a (ARC) _TO It, N._!_I) ON _ Al 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE Mao F YOUR DEPARTMENT/)IVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ,ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT o UU PM ON ._..42ff a' s REVIEI•DING--DEPARTMENT/D-N SION :__i/ (%�'. >-5,,..( ; 4/'Approved Approved with conditions —Not Approved c-12-01A_ - ,/\:b-A-/ 7 L'' L-" • 1' '/V/'/ /I, 7t:,/(/,/,(C/'(' 2--'(()-- ------ - / 'i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: e. e2,,L i . Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved • 1 - / 2//efe6 Signature of Director or Authorize Representa }'iv Date . t .. . ''•-",".,•-•.4,.r ,...„.. -.,.. ' -• •ii - iisi;.1- -••• ' - --,#'40-•:. . .. . . • •:•.;;;,---.:ro.:.-_, ,- I is-.__ _ — . . . . • . . . _____________ -, • ' -—--—-''''''-- - •24 I _ ______ _________,:r,7 ._ - •F.:' ___ , .. _----.t- \ _ . .-..,1 . - I',', •''' I , ' , '. 1..'7.--- t . , 4.I ,-- I'.I PROPOSE° PET,',IL ...E:.!:,-DING _ , • . ___ - _ • i‘ 1 t:.'. _ - - C"-:,.- PE-, SP:•,:',ES S3 SHOW;I ‘•:- i I , . I.(-:'-'•': . 1.>: I I ' • - . -- • t_--- (1..•,.I - - . - . I 1..'l el-) • .. : ••, 1..-2.9 - t--i _ • 11:::: . 1'•! . ' I •.i - • .. r ..., , - i !, 1„,.;....;;'/'..4 -,`,1 i : i . ..• . I- 1 1 ,-.;:,...-.1 • ,----r. . 1 -...y.,.- ,,. 1 , .. ,.., 1 i ; 1 1 1 .; . • i • , 1:- t , , 1 i I 1 ' • 1-'-`7'?1 1 'i . • 1-4".4.-\-...;) .---.7: : . 1 ' . , i I i ! ; : i : i : : • .....) ‘ ') , •1 • i-1- 1 l........v•,:-..7w.m. :„.....vrA .7.•3.C. sl-...--C4:..., • ; I --1.f•‘----i . , ! • •:. ' ' I •1 1 : .. i . 1 • ! ! • !..1 1,1iill ! i. i i : i i : • i • ! . i I.-1 1- i I - - .'4'—' L I-4 1 :, • i ,• I ,: 1:1 ..„... J.,..„; 1- , 4,4 PF,OPCSF.D PROFEZSION,V_ . s I • ...' ',......; '..„,...J2-• --;,- .....----,,....,e, -4--.....----,_‘-‘L.--.--,.. .s.--,-,.. ;-..____,_, . ,,,.. f 1 , •••••••••, I • OFFICE PARK ...1 - '..:1...677,3 1.....:YE•Z . -, • I-' I 1 .I L--Tg'f.-.%;'2:4i1^S.T.7 L /.1.,..!.. ',... C`..C. ) 54,000 i 1 • -•• 1:I . . • . : ' 1.1 ,:, . . • . . . I I 1 ,e=-, J./ ' . ., -.-:', ' , , , . ' ' • i ; .,...C...7„.` ,4„,,,„___I I • i l . ' • -, . • .• . ' ' i 0 i ' ios I,...„. „ v.7.-4 . I . i • • . , . . .,.....Ai ',- . i - i : li-/ i,-.,/ fzi-00'iv;f•,- , i . , . . 1 . . • '; 1 "I : • ' . : .1/ . . : . • : ,• i...,T.)•=-:.,.......,., • ; , • . , . • ,:_..;:.9 • : t...,-.Z.•1 / . • ;/-...-.14i1-- . ' • ' ,:‘-:1,-'-.7-------7-,, .• 1 , • . , . . ' ...,F, /1 - .,e',. c\: :' .• . .. • -i . • , . . 'r--:_- '-- • . -) ,.4.-4-!' s . . . • . C;. I _ : I , • '., .-1.-•'.‘ ..."/ . • . • I . • ' . . -! / / .. / „' ./ I : C: . . , . . . : . . • _.: / r . . . , . - • . , . - . 5,---,,,, . • . • .....,L__...,;.....-- i•, f-'). •..1 / 0 / /,f":-.•-: -8 .3 .,-,i0 , v=i .•., . . 1 i i. . . .,• . /..i:'..- 1 . . /,f•1 I'.1 ,:"'1 • , , 4'.. I'1 - ! 1- . • • I 1 . ., ,",,...,1 .- . •.-• --"N 't •,..-'.--,./ ! ------4X-- j t 7-^ -- / /'/' (6- . • :-... I : .1 1'.\A . • t . . - I-•',I ,i,... ‘ \ -. 2----,... , 1- i•.; i'-:1 1 1 •-• 1----- ---. • . ‘ 1-.- . / :,'.-1'• 1-.-1 I C-s'U NI C- . . i•• 1 i - ^')- I ,. .'. • i :;.•.,,--up. . M ci-Li III . • .. - ,.:\ "A' VO 1\ ,.... ‘ / : , ,.. / .. ' t• , - _. ' •I -- - — /•/ / El . 1 . t-•-'1 ;._ -,,,,, •; ,...._.-,-----.-_\__--- • „.,,4/ • i • 1 i 1 I 1-i- ,.I:. --,--•--.-.,_- - • ....,..,___:-.--______ ___---- N ri/r—i_ / 0 jell ! I':* i 1.;•r: P, IiiiiH ...\--_ ••• ,,,_,-----.--7-=7-:•.,-v--o- / I 1 'I 1 I 1---'4 / ...1--,.t. -7- ---.- -z.A. 11- -----4:"-- • . .,, .1 ' ,. 1-. •,:, . , ,1----s- / .. . 1 •+ I 1.••,.,,•.:\ ,. _.,.. / . . 105' -L,_-.-1 r., , ,^__ V.. 11.,.>-___, ,__,..Z.•:.=Cf.%.• .' . ., •-•,.,:•_), -,,,,- : "1.5 .-'`,'-'-':-. ...:.,....-.. ,...,,.-1:-'7,,.- .- . ::-. .,--• .,,, ,. _ .. -__„:"``.. , .-.:.:,' . / .., Z05.54 i . .. ' , r PROPOSED/FINAL :LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE ')N-SIGNIFICANCE - i Application No . R-002-8.0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECI'_536-80 E FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks a rezone from "G"' to I3-1 and R-3 for future development of retail and service shops and a professional office center . • • • Proponent AIRS . ARTHUR BEALE Location of Proposal Vicinity of 1320 Union Avenue N.E . Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ED not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS „$' is gp is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was mae after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non • Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : A declaration of non-significance has been prepared by the rsponsible official , The declaration of non-significance is for the purposes of the rezone only. Additional review • will be required at such time as the site development is undertaken . Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • • • Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN Title PLANNING D I'RECTOR <, i,. Date d2 Si g n a t u r e - '' .a-� r:�� •° City of Renton (r / Planning Department „/ 5-76 Mr. irs. Lawrence B. Wood 115_ __ielton Ave. N. E. Renton, Washington 98055 February 25, 1979 Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner Renton Planning Department City of Renton Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Rezoning of Arthur Beale Property Dear Mr. Kaufman: In reference to the above rezone, wel as property owners in the area, object to the request for multi-family and business zoning on the Arthur Beale property. Along with our neighbors, we have attended several hearings in the past two years to object to any substantial increase in use of the existing sewer system that services our general area. The City Council was advised as late as February 4, 1980 during the Honey Creek trunk line service hearing that the sewers continue to back up in this area. Mr. Dick Houghton, representing the Engineering Department during this hearing, stated the City has had two recent claims for damages caused by sewers in the area backing up into resi- dential property. Testimony given at prior hearings atated the subject sewer system was already operating at more than capacity at the present time with over pized pumps and equipment. Based on this primary reason, we respect- fully request the rezone be denied. Since we are unable to be at the hearing, we would appreciate receiving a copy of your report and recommendation to the City Council when it is made available. --- Thank you for the consideration given to our request. Sincerely yours, \ G' Lawrence B. Wood RECEIVEb CITY OF RENT0114 HEARING EXAMINER FEB 261980 AM pp� 18!9IIO J1.I12E1E213#4i.��r6 1 i I 1 , 1P1Lk41NMlT(Fd1G DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 111E HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 APPLICANT : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE FILE NUMBER : R-002-80 A . SUMMARY & P(UIfRP(GSGE F tR,[O 1ES1f The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from "G" to B-1 and R-3 for future development of retail and service shops and a professional office center. . B . GENERAL INFORMATION: to Owner of Record : ARTHUR R . BEALE &DONNA R .� NOLAN 2 . Applicant : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE 3 . Location : (Vicinity Map Attached ) Vicinity of 1320 Union Avenue N .E . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . 5 . Size of Property : • t 3 .74 acres 6 . , Access : Via Union Avenue N .E . and Sunset Blvd , N .E . 7o E isting Zoning : "G" , General Classi- fication District ; minimum lot size 35 , 000 square feet 8 .1 Existing Zoning in the Area : G--7200 , Residence Single Family ; R-2 , Residence Two Family ; ' R-3 , Residence Multiple Family ; B-1 , Business Use 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial , Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing • of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on February 13 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on February 15 , 1980 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MRS . ARTHUR HALE , R-002-80 FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 PAGE TWO C . TWIST®HAY/IA1C CCHBOUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2472 of March 28 , 1969 at which time the present zoning classification was applied . D . PHYSICAL 1:;9BEKGHBOUND: 1 . Topography : The subject site rises slightly from south to north at approximately a 4% grade . 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Premeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development . Ragnar-Indianola association , sloping (RdC) . Permeability is moderately rapid inthe upper part of this soil and rapid in the substratum . Runoff is slow to medium and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate . These soils are used for timber . 3 . Vegetation : Scrub brush is the dominant feature with a few junipers and some scattered evergreens . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide some habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : Honey Creek flows across the southerly portion of the property in a southeasterly-northeasterly direction . 6 . Land Use : An older vacant single family residence is located near the center of the subject site with the remainder undeveloped . E . NElapW H➢RHO®ID CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties consist of a mixture of singl? family , multiple family and light commercial uses . F . IPUWLIIIr SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : 12" water mains are located along Union Avenue N .E . and Sunset Blvd . N . E . An 8" sanitary sewer extends east-west on Sunset Blvd . near the east end of the subject site . and secoid-, 8" sewer runs north-south on Union Avenue on the south side of Sunset Blvd . In addition , the Sunset lift station is located adjacent to the subject site on Sunset Blvd . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along Union Avenue N .E . at N .E . 12th Street within 500 ' to the south of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The subject site is within 1/2 mile of the Honeydew and Sierra Heights Elementary Schools and within 1-1/2 miles of McKnight Junior High School and within 1/2 mile of Hazen Senior High School . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , R-002-80 FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 PAGE THREE 5 . ' Recreation : The subject site is within 1/2• mile of Kiwanis Park to the south and within on mile of the proposed King County park west of Sierra Heights Elementary School . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 (C) , General Classification District . 2 . Section 4-709 (A) , R-3 , Residence Multiple Family . 3 . Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business District . H . A11IPfPLICA1Z ILf SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE VE PLAN OR OTHERDff][CI L CITY DOCUMENT: - - • 1 . ; Land Use Report , 1965 , pages 17-18 , Objectives . ' 2 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , 1965 , page 5 , #2 , Community . I . IMPACT OF .THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not have a direct effect on the property . However , subsequent development will remove the vegetation , disturb the soils , increase storm water runoff • and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures , however , these impacts can be mitigated . 2 : Population/Employment : Future development of the ' subject site would provide some increased employment opportunities for area residents and others . 3 . , Schools : Schools;,should not be significantly impacted . Future development of the site may , however , result in increased use by students of the nearby schpols . . 4 . Social : The proposed rezone to commercial and medium density multiple family would provide for those activities associatdd with business and professional office uses . Opportunities for social interaction would then result . 5 . Traffic : Although the level of traffic would increase , the exact amount would be better addressed at the time of specific site development . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been prepared by the responsible official . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utlities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , R-002-80 FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 PAGE FOUR L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed rezone to B-1 and R-3 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designations of commercial and medium density multiple family for the subject site . 2 . The proposed retail shops and related commercial uses together with the planned professional office structures would be compatible with each other and consistent with uses allowed in the B-1 and R-3 zones by the City ' s Zoning Code if a special permit were granted for the professional offices . 3 . The subject site was part of the general area included for review of the Comprehensive Plan in 1976 although the site itself was not amended and the zoning classifi cation has remained the same since annexation . ,. (Section 4-3014-A) . 4 . On July 28 , 1975 the parcel of property adjacent to the east was rezoned from G-7200 to R-2 (CHG International ) and on April 27 , 1979 the northwest corner of Sunset Blvd . NE and Anacortes Avenue NE (approximately 1/4 mile east ) was rezoned from "G" to B-1 and R-3 (Althoff),. 5 . The land use designation of commercial for the southerl 3/4 ' s of the property appears to be consistent with policy statements of the Comprehensive Plan including "Minor retail centers or neighborhood shopping district - , . commonly will be located near the perimeters of several neighrbohoods and at the intersection of major roads and arterials . In contrast with the major shopping districts which provide comparison shopping , the neighborhood shopping centers should serve as convenient outlets for a limited number of goods and services . Such locations will normally, contain grocery, drug and hardward stores , restaurants , and other related shops and personal services . " The medium density multiple family designation for the northerly 1/4 would also seem to be consistent , with the policy statement of "In medium and high • density residential use districts --- other compatible uses may include --- shopping districts and other functions which are not detrimental to the maintenance of desirable living conditions . " (Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , Page 11 ) . 6 . Fire hydrants and access shall be installed and made serviceable prior to any building::construction and water main installation shall be as per water engineering requirements as advised by the Fire Department . A pre-construction conference will also be required with the Fire Marshall . See other comments . 7 . Utilities Engineering notes that a latecomer 's agree- ment for water on Sunset Blvd. NE will be required . and that standard hookup fees for water and sewer , will apply . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , R-002-80 FEBRUARY! 26 , 1980 PAGE FIVE 8 . The conceptual site plan with proposed structures appears to be compatible with the adjacent land , uses . In order to emphasize the intertie between commercial uses and the professional office buildings , , the proposed B-1 zoning of the subject site should require specific site plan approval prior to the issuance of building permits . This will help insure consistency with any future Special Permit provisions that might be required for professional office buildings in the R-3 zone as proposed . 9 . The existing land uses adjacent to the subject site create a situation where buffering of the proposed uses on the site are required . The low density multiple family to the east of the site is in the form of condo- miniums . . These condominiums should be buffered with a landscaping area of at least 15 feet . To the north of the site the area is presently occupied by single family residences . Even though this area to the north is desig- nated for potential medium density residential , the exist- ing single family residences should be buffered with a 20-foot landscaping strip . Both of these landscaping areas on the north and east could require the addition of a fence to provide the separation . The exactiiarchitectural elevations of the proposed build- ings in both the B-1 and R-3 portions . of the subject site could have a 'substantial impact on the adjacent residential uses as a result of their height . Any further site plan reviews of the subject site should pay particular concern to the number of stories and the architectural treatment of the buildings . 10 . The traffic situation cannot be analyzed at this point without an exact knowledge of the future development of the site . The commercial development could result in either light or heavy traffic patterns at various times during the day . Therefore , the environmental review at the time of site plan review would be critical . In addition, the option of the R-3 property could range from either approximately 25 apartment units to the con- struction of a professional office building , if a special permit were granted . This would have a different effect • on the traffic generation of the site . It would also modify the impact on the single family land uses to the north . M. DEPARTMENTAL L RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval of the requested rezone subject to : 1 . Installation and operation of fire hydrants , water mains , and access as per Fire Department comments . 2 . Execution of the latecomer ? s agreement for water and payment of standard hookup fees for water and sewer as per Utilities Engineering comment . 3 . Site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner for development of the entire subject site due to potential impacts on the existing uses to the north and east . 4 . The filing of restrictive covenants to establish a. 15-foot wide landscaping strip on the eastern property boundary and 20 feet on the northern property boundary . .. ..., , / /.., ,, . 1' i - I : ' ' , • 0 I,' ls -- , '•-,-.e. :^- -'• •• / - •..:1 ...p--,...•.,61-,e,....0'rl'S .'''.1i '‘,, .,,:°.. ',..s... .2.•,.._,I. ,) . ‘,. ,, .t,_,.-______. . ,fr,..,:._,,?,•'. -•• - 7j f '1 1! ,;.'..-_--,...- 7•,.,J3 •.,,, ; /..z,:i• , , •• ', I. ., , 3•..-.-1 8 i 0,.: - .'" .. ._._,. _, . 51- .'• '1! -,,'`' • `''.1' '4''t .. 7-4-:::: 5. ''' --. ••-'•'- /'" ' ' '1,' • ' Ili 'r• i i T - ' . g q q. 's,<......,,i5 , ,,:. ',!. .`"rs c.----''' -,',•1'." ' •' "••' " '' '`-'•'.'.'-''1- '''''''.1•''' -' 0 . //,-, • ' ' .' . "L''•''' ' •. I..,...Ls] I.,'•o' - ' ' 0 I Q IL,'7D 1 ,,--11 Q,„,„p a \),,.,.., - , • ,•, , ,.- ,,.! i .__. ,_. L.„I., 1._•,:n,__.- __, , 4 i r..,,,,,-'--••:,..,_ .. • •u.°,- •' •••.,,,,----" ---'-. .y_..-.:g.).',° ,,•' ' 0 I. q_. `_.•--1. ''''' ' ','' ',,. -' •'', • ::'2.,7,:`../''' ',,: .. -'F....4..‘. • • • ° ,L._ -I:'d a' _,_..i..2!_2. 4 L 3 , • G--71-'):itd00 l• •• ' '''''''• x ---T 6 c . .4.z . -- i'6 NN [7'1: ,,..,v....4,,el. .=.il••- - 0 f • 1.' / • •; D I " ', 0/. 1 i i f I 3. i Il v, 4. • ---1-3 L , -'. '.34 ' - /ts .., . ' . Li -J : .1 , rp•'---`'' i<, .<-' . p 1 r---1 -1 ;).; i Cf:),,,,, -( .8 • ..,1 \ • l• • 0 ' . •y l''-'1.-•z,;;7 4`..-',,..-/ .-, 1 . r,, g g J ',. - a , _, ,,,„. a/\,•,,v_' ;',., ,,.,,,,/, '--.•\1.__..--r=---' 41, . .. ^ f..T .-• --T-"1.,_47,=,,,:1; •.I';',.: (.,;:,;';,-..;',,,,,...'_ • 7 , ,.-•,.;',,,,oH•64„..____!4;;;,•,,,1 f3.6., ,,,,/(H,A. ,i...0.7s%.,'ee,,?3T C.3 ett-J=-.1 IV...V r.:41' . • ia.“41-•-•-P.•cre-feNri-mare-ap•<,..•<,...,<40 i , '• . 0".-.i. ' : i ; • t , i' \ \ 0 1 I J i 1 .i "2"2 I'r-• ' -8.Triss''''''It4i---\';''"...!+ ..,IN, ,8../h?",,,,1_,...,,,,,?..y:.1.22,,,,.„ , i • '11 . ' /../' ' 9 ! 1 1 • „C-isf1i!',':''''.• : '.t:."-'-•4 • ."•• „,1,•,-il-r..,.•I.!, . ,,,'".../.'"'>••1-1 ' --,$• ' - r - ' ,:'''...a 2-2 -se"'"'"'''''' '3i2-- ---;•,;., 4-it IN -7:2-.0 qi' ''.""...\ir•'''• 8 j,L)14171 . • ,. ,,,.._.‘', ., ' _ _ ', I,T,1 1 Z."-,,...r. ,...4,--:!:e1--\ 7 vf........4.... ..22.-4..42 .2.2•••• • - .31.--,11-3.. : . ,„/".‘, , 4 3; . !.1 .- '`,folarl-----____ . '.---1--- 1 1 , .4.. .! _i_ ' I n ' =37-, s'-' --,.._...--•,-..--,;,,l-f`.3.,- R... - k. 4 • ; • ..1,.,,,„ 1 .0'3'3..4_T_______--8 , ,,,, 8 it `'- --r 0 1/ p,.,..9 irk.o.r.g,i • 1 , , •.- I / i . .••• ) . L jr---1 ‘, 4--ige6-- % . , __ v „ Et= 14,3, 4"'"''' EP" ...k.,).0 ...,„. 1 .- , I .17. ,..' . . 1 1. ,, ,. ... z, ,, ,. •., 5 t 11-74,,e. t--tf- .-tr 9.--L, N.N ... :, • . L.,,,,B ai , 3 i 1 ;, •2 .....1•_. 1_ ,--- ,..- 1 , : ti,..,' g,:-, ...-..! -I- .1 ! P'•<z!, . ----- ••.. .1- -1---- .,, ' a . „-I. , 1F `-. '--: '•-' r•--L" . ' ', . 0 '! ' .. °.'7..,'' ,.•,..,,,,, ' ......-L.__ q__. , U.,....1 , : C:i i f .---,-..-„,.... ,,, :r, 9 .3 p. . .1. 0,'„ 6 • .,-- ,,r,,,,,,:,=-,.,,t - - ,....-. -.7.-- .4---....,!..,-.-.2,-,-.....s-...---,-.. -........:-.- ..,, .7...-..,--, - --.._...-",4 :A 1,--1 t •,....,1 ., , ,,,, ._ _, • '1 t .;. ., 1J .. 8i 1.-' [ -• -_- s. ;.,„,:_yi iv F Ili.Pt. ' FR-3 1 1 7, -81- 1. -!A...'"" S /vs < e..!S..;-: 0 1 i ' ---^- • .i i E ,0••• „,,,,,. 72..-=1 ...-X*''-'---7 •t ' '- .'. --.41 ' • • . t fl ' •4-i%,'c'.,. .;,.:_p.1.. .L_I ..-77-1 , .......,A, .. - 44. 3 ;, ,,*2,-3, -4 z ..1_1 ., i.•, ..." •..------- z ' •- n t..,"47. , C.,, . .1 71 i-'-4--2.- "r 4:1 "4-`t3 . ' Z , ' a--'I, Id .• 4. 1-''t141,94•':1 A ? .``,'•', 'II [1•Hs;g.-1-!-''-- " .. Ili VI - s s.I:\'4;"'/14.1 1.'_2_.' Ls..! ' " !I t'__•._ _ ,„it. -32_1.° ' :-. !,,,, Nucl_irk...”.•6T y:.,,,, ,,1 si,, •,•--k.:„NN\, ..y_i.I on,sr,....ThA,,4_ .•- 4 s-4'4 1.7_, , cx..,' ,,,, 1, ,3,T41...,..W,t,' ‘ ,, --1 II'III ''..,,l 01 , 0,,,.:. ...', `,,,I.f...,i-•-'--4.1,t14-1-4'.1 , I'!.10:14, ,v,-_-_ -' IIyi.,02-4-:,-;-,,e,,7,1 .= • ,,,„41. \- .-4 . , ., ‘, , ,.?,,...1 ,,.._.i:!,1•_;,,,L,.,,.._,}...,,L, „... ..,zt_t}_., , ..-„,i '.; ,____, r-.A.- ,,..„1„ .1..N. • 1 r."-1,-'.4g'"-r•-'1--- Z ••±---`. .'-I ,,----.,,•" 1-7--- LYa,.r, :-,-',..L•44,-,s-:1. --t--,. ' - 'N 1----- ' , ',;z• ,1-_ L al, • i, !_IL'in:=1.7.1"." "-.:111:1•1''.23.; il , , . 0 ._ 2 f i . / --.1tu ---)-- \-7...----A°-,',.-:- -;= I' ''-• ,-- e, ,, .,..,k. _„ , 0 I . ' i • .!= ' ^IA--1-,-,,,f,,..,?--- li'L!_,!' ,, 0---i!r!1'7,''.., !•,.) , 3,•=15I-:-.1. -;.1,,,I, ., ,I..,:lz ',.'3 , i 14 1---4.;)g, --1- •.‘„,"4,,,,. \\ ,.,,,,___---, '' \ ±-' w[..I I.-'.."1:••17,, 1 •.... 1..I d..I! . * l 4.11-1",'C --""-'1,,'2 4',-•••\-r,_.11,-"1 ,6 :' 27i r1-2, 1 I n_'..1`21'.ill ..L',.!_i. 27_!_'....1' !' ', 9 . ... ' ,...,, ...., .,.... ,,,,,*:-,7,...,i ,Etz4....7.73, :.,-.0A3--23,72". • •=,,,...32..... ,..2.-22,v124.2 .:I fa; ...I__, N.k,QT.li 1. I I I. , • ' • I , , R... . - >,.,...! , . ,,,,,:,,,, , '",--1-1-VP--'7 f 11 , f. 8 • • f 1 I -; 0., ,,,„. , 4:3.•I-• L i , . 0 1.'I ,.1#' -,H,• • • • • • • • : r.... .1:',.•.,.,-..!,r• ••• 1 ( \ . , e _,,,- . • • -I i.r 1 4-.- L..:-!,• "' 1' r r. -:-.• --"'_:•••°\z DI. , • i . .-: ;.,•,•• • i .....,.. ._:.:!in.IL.L.....f. L.2..i.Vti:rrt..1"1-iii•f2..7•-r,.dk_s , ,, ,,,Q .. ,-.„ • le --:.1 .7.--c-r-T 2-"-4-. C: .. wrb--r--1/,4,,.-rT-7-,7i--7-\,>2) 1..... , t.1........,r•-,-mr--,r ,",.<<,•••.16•..t.••Oik II.2.1S.Ila• •....¢.••Ma••M•ta••l.P.•W.!•1.11.• .' ••f'.1 ..•ril•,IILI 01.,l. : , .EFT.....1 •14,1;,....4.-1.:i,,,,,,,,' 1......., .1' , r, „ ,-i,„-1t; ,+.-1., ",•. ..,, ,„.11 72 -. 't-,-....': C ''' -Y 1'-i-h;'',:--t,).••'';'--.Y-.... a'I ; 9.C' 1 -• --..• • .. -:i 1-, ''u'H...",.A-4,;;.....714_, i., - ' • ..,or_c• i-i _ •_•r..2, -e f.......,,...k.---.1-c:_:./_,-1-,-.7.-:.,;1- ., ....-,.." „121.1,,,, t i . 1-, .1 . ... . .., • , , .!..1r4i:"..2.....1...::,11,,11.,o_r.J.,ez,L..._...L.1;_b;:cHt kg,:•___.1,;(jr.,\.,11••••,-. -r, ...1 m.,,it H e I '• 1 MRS . ARTHUR BEALE . R-002-80 • ! t . .. t . ,. • . i ... ............ _ .,_ ..,........ ., APPLICANT MRS. ARTHUR BEALE . ' TOTAL AREA + 3. 74 acres 1 k' Via Union Avenue NE and Sunset Blvd NE PRINCIPAL ACCESS' i i . . "G" , General Classification District EXISTING ZONING • EXISTING USE One single family residence in center, remainder undeveloped PROPOSED USE Future development of retail and service shops and a professional office eeaLer . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Commercial, Medium Density Multip e Family. . COMMENTS . . . , • , ( - -... --.- -- ..........„--- .. 41115ZINIMMEMBIEL.. ,. . Renton Planning Departure DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET , A p p I i cation __,0 _06/"s,- -(!l=1- 2-G. __s, er.*(0 i y —� Pr- P P taja ea ( 'lei°01,1 r ,I, SAap 5, P , i t9V.`?..?."t"e.::,,n et / 6)8661.'e e'' ef*G-0,12% r Location : /pp�� .y12 �ty~�(S ��'"'�. �"yID sf/ �"/� , .' • , T Applicant ° , =ez,it?( 114(5" -a-bi en I TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATEo•_ 1 °� ..__ Police Department A R Co MEETING /2.et�' i Public Works Department ' Engineering Division Traffic Engineering „;�;A 1�c,/VV ; __---- f3 a r l o n g Division �,_.a 1, ,, . VUtilities Engineering ,,,; 1 ; • Fire Department COflME�ITS OR-SgGGk=ST- o�1S R=GARD. I IG HIS /\ P_,I(�AT:(ON SHO-01I) BF PROVIDED N FOh THE AI I.ICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO B� O^, C? -� 0 _ _ _ AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FOORLCONFERENCEE RO F YOUR DEPARTMENT/VI S I O - , BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC) P2 EA E PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO I THE�dPLANNINGILL OT DEPARTMENT ON :.7 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: --_ T Approved 4/ Approved with conditions Not Approved �tcss7 ,iE&T eAteti/6 9i te/°-1 ..cle cape te-e-FeNsiri.em•C'7Q-73- Fa7yzz occf ./..,7k, 7' 73---f-. ✓-1':52 meet i'e ' /�G®4i /e6fee//2.e-1C` ,5. 7 y, / () "t4er-r4ek Ce "7.,ac' ; J/'/3J.G-//W-a.; tf, S.74/n a , vs-rfirizcr.) 4M3 /4/isa,74j4.>eo As geewree..50 .43,k, Fs.ed ev#4,,,, • r"-/: l//Y/o/ ,17. /.s ftA AfatedS sm' e . 4e At.1744ee:0 MA oe 1V/ ,9r3.E , (Z-K.•aP',I ,.• ,3 L0e' costs i'2‘e rid , , e.//9: 1-1/e-46 J/ss ro ,e-4 rl d it, 41 cat:: 6.,,,3 t ✓ rRr /��' ,Pe rt h / c i f l� e co,1...�;W!c.ee'�:Qr..� cat-ram ,- %�t, ,:: LZ1:1' ","cb', : oda/ ):(A.e -: '. • '' . .el" • f s+o I r 9 Signature of Director or ' horized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV SIONa ___ _✓ Approved `_`__Approved with conditions Not Approved .C71 s'4 r r U /r �L Sic, 0.:✓_ C4/,a/j.Ca& • °l/Sv r-r 5c wc.,,c_. • . t7V $L (:t S6'-✓5et.. ir1i`l- C e_c: cc i 2,.fsit< .Ul/ Su Fr .t(auCe r_ 0E-c s FA 0,4. • I , az..________ ' 3/340 .1gn .< ure of Di� _' - - rectoror AiTTIOrized Representative Date 1 . , , Renton Planning Departmen _ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : it?Lc2pSe;64g2:12,9c.:2—SO) 4617 et° R $ lc /I-4a 4,1 5. el kee k•P dtei 5 P:70-ent, Pe!';- P'? / We eed-dler'. Location : /10:e.o.rmciar eSte- 4/6e1Yert 4/6P. Applicata :. AF,e.le TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :' ,/a6/80 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING c-7/0'0 Pmblic Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering • I/ Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department MYINrAGNTAPRIERMIUMSCERRIMA01.9 FIRM "TM9 Al 900 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE F YOUR DEPARTMENTMTVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARCd PlIEA4E PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY D:00 PM ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /434b_ZL,/ Approved Approved with conditions Not Approved REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ' kApproved Approved with con Not Ardroved Signature of Director or Authorize Represenf — ate • • • . . - `/ ! ( cj4_J Renton Planning Department „ . DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 137; ,VO) ' 1-o cation : t4— ,P� ' -'t CV 8Ald r.+ a ,apq dye. v6 Applicant :' je f— /,1• 7- d p- TO :_ Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:. ��("V Police Department A, R. C a MEETING, <//?'/i'Q Public Works Department Engineering Division :, Traffic Engineering 1) , 1 1,- Building Division FEB nn Utilities Engineering A� ."�� • Fire Department • 'OMM- OP, SUGGESTIONS REGARDI G THIS A7PLICATION SHOULD DE PROVIDED ITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CO1JFERENCE- (ARCS o I RR �.�✓ _ � � L H E.(_I� ON rf AT9:00iiINTHETHIRI) CONFERENCE i, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE FLOORE 'A LE TOE N`d A i I VE WILL LL NOT IMF �AI3 LE TO ATT N THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:UG PM ON „ ,../L3 .. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : _al — _' Approved Approved with conditionis Not Approved TThis rezone would he in the best thf ern r-t rhe area . •• Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I NAnproved A �___� pproved with conditions Not Approved ar ZONE bt.):// c !�c�Ll7`4(7 . O c J+- f"�' I >~ e'd r- yam/ /c S i gnatnnre of�Di rector or Authorized Reo *A) _. , ti �sentative � Date PROPOSED/FINAL :CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE ON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-002-80 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-536-80 fp FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks a rezone from "G'' to B-1 and R-3 for future development of retail and service shops and a professional office center. Proponent MRS . ARTHUR BEALE Location of Proposal Vicinity of 1320 Union Avenue N.E . Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have 13 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is X_ is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental /significance : A declaration of non-significance has been prepared by the responsible official . The declaration of non-significance is for the purposes of the rezone only. Additional review will be required at such time as the site development is undertaken. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) . declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y. ERICKSEN A°f Title PLANNING D.I'RECTOR �V° Date ,�. - .$�� Signature 4791 7 City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 / i • . 1 6 ; F f'v 4:':1444,4,+ "{L4 �? 4�*TFo f++l. * L +,4? •} ,, #u,iv ,—by,r• •�'4 l�¢tL' ir; � y q / ., \''. ik Ittrrim , ,•;-), ':,.:*4 t. ., 4 — 0,4 11QTgi 44 , , u • aS+''. � � ti �r vi: �' #�Y x* F7 �vY.rs";41 aI • '''-0-' '''''^ 41* t! 1 c, 1 , 4-1%`• 44/1 lyt . Vil :Aiiir p �S, T: �*?'�A 3'i i off` T l r$ •• "I'.. GENERAL L CATIO : AND, IP,- DD ESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF UNION AVENUE N .E . AND N .E . SUNSET BOULEVARD — THE NORTHERN 100 FEET TO R-3 AND THE SOUTHERN 300 FEET TO B-1 . LEGAL DE -`: R •rno : LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT . fps � }.. � t�t.�.• s.� � .. ,�� S ,,. t T E T��+ TIF _1 OPE TY • ',e, . S t• . , )141.0 iii r:7. :, f ''' ..,, r . ,, P,,iL, :: , fa ,,,Ce, ,it 44114. t4 Pl. : ie '''N • TO BE HER. Iy IN CITY C IU CLL CHARL-ENS, ' Ua-.MC9 , L = 1OLDD G . ®N FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 EGIN= FG AT 9 :00A. M . R . • :>a aRo s+ F ? . i�`k h1 S � y ,t ,• t . .r.@�1 etc " i�. �p,'"• ; sr IV riEZ0:, :tii c:: .,., , , 2, ._.,..../i: THE NORTHERN 100 FEET TO R-3 AND , ;- - THE SOUTHERN 300 FEET TO B-1 . ,. ,........_.. .mot �, 15: �K s � ,.' al• ''�-:e#s-:aa tirrrrr, % } 0 ,,. rkr. '., t- . . • I-1 tfrif 1 !VI i. ct A. K }5n • , . G : E ! T h y� y r1SHi Y . i 1s ..., {, .Y .„ ) , , I FOR : RTHER NFORMATION CALL 235 25 I MIS NOT C! MOT T• LE E' sVE" , 81 OUT i--OP ; ,; UTH• ROAM F 5 � ....p ® ` H CITY OF RENTON U ql® . Z .ma t MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAY0R 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT co' 235- 2550 ? D SEP,E�p,O February 8 , 1980 Mrs . Arthur Beale . 4325 N .E . Sunset Blvd , Renton, WA 98055 Re : NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 and R-3 ; File No R--002-80 ; property located on the northeast corner of Union Ave , N .E . and N .E . Sunset Blvd. . - the . northern 100 feet to R-3 and the southern 300 feet to B-1 Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above ' mentioned application on January 4, 1980 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for February 26 , 1980 at 9 : 00 a .m . Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours, • Gordon Y. Ericksen , Planning Director • RogertiJ . Blaylock, Associate Planner cc : Donna R . Nolan 139 N .E . 53rd Seattle , WA 98105 Richard Kloppenberg , President KEY WEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 18000 Pacific Highway So . , Suite 11Y7 Seattle, WA 98188 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON FEBRUARY 26 , 1980 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . MRS . ARTHUR BEALE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO B-1 AND R-3 , file R-002-80 ; a 3 3/4 acre site on the northeast corner of Union Avenue N .E . and N .E . Sunset Boule- vard - the northern 100 feet to R-3 and the southern 300 feet to B-1 . 2 . SWANSON-DEAN CORPORATION (CANYON OAKS) , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A 31-LOT SUBDIVISION OF A TOWNHOUSE P .U .D. , file PP-453-79 ; property located along the east side of Kennewick Place N .E . between N .E . 30th and the old Pacific Coast Railroad right-of-way . 3 . SEA-BELLE PROPERTIES , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE , File SP-402-79 ; property located immediately east of Lake Washington Blvd . N.E . between S .E . 76th St . and S .E . 80th St . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 26, 1980, AT 9 :00 A .M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : February 13 , 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , ROGER J. BLAYLOCK , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the r�`1 7th day of February, 1980 . SIGNED �P Willa*!, DEVELOPMENT • t adtC' COr?POR.ATfON • 18000 PACIFIC HWY.SO.,—SUITE 1117 ..p SEATTLE,WA.98188 (206) 246-5153 • - January 31, 1980 Mr, Steve Munson Assistant Planner City of Renton Municipal Building Renton,,Washington 98055 Re: Proposed rezone of Sunset Square from G to B-1 & R-3 Dear Mr. Munson: As the agent for the rezoning of the northeast corner of the intersection of Union and Sunset Blvd. , I would like to indicate why this rezone is appropriate and timely. You will note that we are asking for the B-1 classification for the first 300 feet from Sunset Blvd. , and R-3 for the rear 100 feet of the property. The proposed B-1 will accommodate retail shops, food service businesses, savings and loan institutions, and banks. We intend to use the R-3 portion for professional medical-dental . We feel that the R-3 portion will serve as an excellent buffer for the B-1 portion. The 300 feet may be referenced to the comprehensive plan use map in the Renton planning office. Please also refer to the enclosed site plan which also incorporates the 300 foot provision. Please be advised that the subject property has always been considered commercial , but no one until now has ever formally asked for a rezone of the property. Please note' that since the last previous comprehensive plan analysis of the rezoning application of the subject property, authorized public improvements , permitted private development or other circumstances affecting the subject property have undergone the following changes: 1. Please note that all public services are available to the site • as per Exhibit #1. We are expressly willing to pay all referenced charges. Please also note that the sanitary sewer line recently installed by the Forestbrook Condominiums runs along the western boundary of the subject property. This sanitary sewer line will enable all of the subject property to be served by this line. 2. Referring to Exhibit #2 and Exhibit #3, which are aerial photos of the subject site, please note the recent new construction at the corner of Duval and the Sunset highway. This deveicdment is located at the next major intersection to the east of the subject property. -_.__.— .�.__�___ �.. .-.-........,�...,....o-,--........,—,..wcrw.a....a+i:.,,,,"aKe:....zii.'.0«'I!a'+F.1:".'6",-,dfr•:v,,,ems:uat:24P4s�.hK:d.$Y.31_&'ii.=Yrt,,•,,,,,,. / `} ...., . j . ' j) Munson, 1/31/80, Page two. . The new construction consists:of-the following: Albertsons, Pay-n-Save, Taco Store, and McDonalds. Air photo, Exhibit #3, is a view toward the west and Lake ,Washington. Please note the commercial activity which includes Sunset Plaza, Skaggs Drug Store, Lucky Super Market, and etc. This commercial area.: is the next commercial core to the west of the subject.' property. It may be noted that there has been many new commercial activities located .in the Sunset Plaza area, •but vacant commercial ;_property .seems: to_ be_unavailable: The demographic -fi gures• indicate, a three-mile population to be in excess of 60,000' and'a- five7.-mile'-;population to be in excess of 110,000 from the subject site. .`The _population :base'will be growing substantially because the last.'commercial: 'area -to.. the east is. the intersection of Duval and Sunset'andr:tcy the:east. of. this" intersection is considered to be all single family .residential.: . Sunset Highway is a primary state highway with -a. traffic -volume=of 20';000+ vehicles per day, thus the subject site:_and intersection is. anatural _ commercial .area as.-opposed to single family residential:- .. 3. The property- is potent'ially:'zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant-to the policies °set forth -in the Comprehensive Plan and conditions have been_ niet which would-:indicate the change is • appropriate. . Please refer to Exhibit #4- and Exhibit #5 from the rezone file No. R-272-.79. Note. that. the comprehensive plan as adopted by • ordinance 3112 as of•February 28; 1978, indicates the subject property as 8-1 and R-3. - : . - - Exhibit #5 and Exhibit '#6 are part• of file number R-272-79.• Please note that the Comprehensive Plan identifies_"minor retail centers or neighborhood shopping districts will be located near the perimeters of several neighborhoods and at the intersection of major roads and arterials." An existing commercial node exists at both of the intersections of Duval e - and Sunset and Union and .Sunset. Please note that the report also ' considered R-3 as an adequate buffer in the subject area. Please note that the demand in the. area exists for commercial property that - is available for development. Services are all available to the site (Exhibit #1) ' - and the site is level and treeless, •requiring no change in the ecology. Considering that the subject site has never been proposed to be rezoned, and the comprehensive plan indicates that the subject site and intersection is .indeed commercial in nature, please allow your consideration for rezoning of •. the subject property. Please do' not hesitate to call or correspond with me if any 'questions, ari' e; .:therefore I remain, Sincerelyours, • 1 V e ,. _ --- -- Ri shard L. Kl-oppenburg ---- _ President . -• - • RLK/d . • Enclosures . • OF Rs641• �. PUB PC WORKS DEPARTMENT %)c� ENGINEERING DIVISION 235.263I 'MUMICE PAL BUILDING 230 MILL AVE.SO. RENTO I,WASH.23055 13 , 2'6-0 " C--14‘� October 12, 1979 CHARLES J. DELAUREEMITI MAYOR Key West Development Corporation '.8000 Pacific Highway S. • Suite 1117 Seattle, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Kloppenburg: In reference to our conversation on October 9, 1979, the information you requested is as follows: 1. Water latecomer on Sunset Blvd. NE = $7.2793 per front foot 2. Sunset Lift Station = .01C per sq. ft. 3. Water System Development Charge = .01C per sq. ft. 4. Sewer System Development Charge = .OlC per sq. ft. 5. :ray Creek Interceptor = .03C per sq. ft. 6. Latecomer for sanitary sewer to Forestbrook Condos, estimated cost unavailable at this time. Sanitary sewer line under construc- tion October. 1979. 7. Inspection fee of 2% of all offsite improvements and public utilities 8. The developer will be required to improve Union Ave. NE in accor- dance with the six year street plan, Said improvement will consist of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drainage, paving and street lighting. The street is to be 44 ft. wide curb to curb including a left turn lane at Sunset Blvd: NE. If I can be of any further assistance, please advise. Very truly yours, • Donald G. Monaghan, P.E. Office Engineer PC:pmp EXHIBIT #1 • 111 1,..,,;;Ir,,.•••7!4i••‘ 1-4i.,,,,..,,.?,t'a• . , i .._..... FLo ......„.„..,;%‘.,...,tr.. ' (c) -,i'llfr ii i'''',,)4'i-..??;,F;,;‘i.lii‘-iy*..'240:„,g4t.j:4.rd:tr.-':'''?''.''. 4145"i.e7'..),‘''. • -%ei._,.5'j'?;:f'..::.-44114 t t a"--4 i',.::. v) ,. , j''--f''7,-,.-` '-`i-$,'-,''/.',.,.,;...„, iet.,,.. ..-•i • -.;0-..,,.,,,I itt 4--c,.'.4,;',';,:;,;,4,;„.1,-* ,4.,k,t4f.t i,4fipt7.,.;r1&fk.014ik---iy1t,,0 e V '.t 7i,t.;t,it..:„)„..6„041,,4-,,4.1,.,IS4,f,,,,L,,k"5,.ts:.,tt:''re.'i'.t• ,"„-1„„`4,i,„,-A..,.•.VW44--.14 4,1T4ig f 0„t0,'o,i.,',,',,„.4'.4,,...,...,..,,,,,:,,•,-k,.."„r,-..,4:,r:1i.'4-.,.,'.i,-.4r,:t,,,144'.':,T'0;„e.,,':'..4"-,..,'.,,1,'.,4 4*'-1•k.-.4r•1'., -4414 4 A I Yl ,'-e-,,',-t,-,-.0,,,-.,,"-.1,-0:s s,_i:,ti,).P;•*t--',,'',--.'-4•:,_'','-;,'I-5''V','-,' .,. •,: ..,f, .• .' •i;•*-.• ,••••. 3. .:-ir-,0:,..f;.?",• • , --1,----_,*-- • ,0•Jik,...,-,x-s,-.z . . • 1.•:••.,,,?,,,,r„,-,4110,..11-,•,--.4-, .•' .'"'-.•,'It,;',. ••ie....- '•14-14k-I',..,. .-vit,t-f''•1,-g!:,..et -A.•-:,--'- ',-Avi = st-i!",,,, F•v:.-4,-,),A ,7.ww-.'. •b-')4',-",a.er-,..-'.,,' 444' -54,,AW7-. Iii-,"•,i'4ft'Al...1q1f '*.e.'..',;k.:-•p -',-:h1r4I,VV`.• , .,,,.•,4-4q.igk.:,,,,r3Efr.r. e( ,„i43,6_ ,ileita ...,t),;g4'if.ijovz..4 tit•&.4,/,*4,*.s.,,,,,,ot, . „_.,,4,i,-,, .vii..„,;:,.,„,:.,..e.,..;,:a...e,.„, , VA,,,•-4!ii...1.60Ptge, . •,.'0,:g0;t,41.11.4SS-C-4.1.,,I,,, = '-di./.7.1:',.'i'Xg.-4i•-:3'.--4ifl.45111''" ,'Sgir:VAWL.T. 1ter?:,':- 4itieviii*Ttvlio .,--„,tp--35gt,-, ,..-411.04.:44-07,145,45., rAtvv;. , „,,,.....k„..L."-1,11'04,;:",' ':- ",1*.,itIP";,g,.:..§ .;.•,!.. , „ .„,,,,..,,„,.„, -„„ .,.. , ,, ._..„,.., , „ % ,,::„,_,„..,f,,,,„ „,„,„:„4,-„,.., „.„,,,,,,.„,„1,,-,,,.. [ , .. ,-4-PA,Y4ti'ir .441,14=',:).,-'4, -,,,.;-.0.•*•:-,;,47r4At,',.:0.1' w I-- . .. ,--='- ‘.--,2-.3.11;:cf,',.-',"3:,•,:,,Sg.tsi,4,0 :kgs'i-I,)..:•_,, ,i---fgf..*.-V*:'it' .'--1•!,-zitgi 1'''fif•'?.--4V-0,t . . ..•r'l"!..T,',:- '441' '4,411 •;*...' ‘I--;--+-*,:,...rim•s•on, _.„.------ (..0 V L' 7.,,I., ,yrf7..vv-i.Tlt-.4.:. --- c\J :.----',-:•..'..I'T.-:',-'..4,44-7,A ,.-'el.':,,,.„...\.-;t4.:.'<p'-'iii1114#•;6•,,(-A,Nity,•,ii.u. :.:.4fz7-flic.,,, T,14tc. niti,,531,,,i',:,,.tt ,-...:,:lt2.._.-=•-• , 1/2.14,,,,.r44, . '...-,-.. 7,Vfl el t V,..-7474,'''.. § g4. I--- ;',.','A4-ii•71 ,,,--`t .,,.-,op rx 114A,PVI+i.t-31.1,,,---(-$`',1 ,4,1-:,,,›..,ke p•--Tik-l'„kil --•.',..,,a`i'.:'•.';''.===irki-,',v.,-A,,,.ql,;':'6'.;:tiw!"1,7'...t•P 1-•••• :-,1-01..;k7-14:4,so..4.-,.„ 1,---112, P,'•,'0-.41.-.-L.,.,,r.- ..-..,•T• , cc ,,d,•.-4',,;',.•,,-•Y`:::•p:,.---;-,-,j,,,14.,:-.."-!., . ,•r,,--;-43%-.„Pl.ET, -7 Ag, kt.JA-1-1-:„...:..:t47..1._14;5:::'4i:;,--.'Yg, , Lor. •'-- ,..-.41-,-.1,,,i-f.,,.._.,.,..,,, .., r, 1,.t. ,,..a ,_74:,1_I.- 't-. .o._ •;'-fftiAfIFly .,41.1 ai.•Llic 1,.w f ii-.:,t,'.:1"j;-,,l'•0,',t_lkl" ,:_• _J'`,i'.,'',IVL.4.ii-,144„ = -VI , x „,,,,,.,:••_-,,,,,,••;,,,,,,,..,_,•z-',—1,f,;-,-q-*,;-„,-,1- 1r••-1::•:,_.-:-.7,1,'i,. ,7.1,-.,,11.1,t,t1.7 .-f-,!:Itl•R;t:t ..a°,i'..-• rm w 7.-A,,,-,,-.,5,-,,,,., -,r-i.,,-1,--E,(....1.ceo.1•,..t:,-.a.ir, i,, ,,,. ,„::-;f- ,-1-,-:-:•--- ,•'.,-.,--Vt,l'-n-1,••=,1f,,,-1.4- 4'--:',.°A4, ,F:-.-.'7,,-:',.141,,y-!":1;t•tt,!•j1 1:3. l''n•Jklr'St-•" ;;''''1.`''.1 _1 .-1-:,:„. ., - -,?...-:-',: ,--_,-...•.f.,,. .,,.„-•,..•tc40,„1,-....-,r.-_,,,,..ri .,-,44.1,,..t4.,=:;o 4,7x•i.i •- - .., . s'. v,%„-: 1,--ekl-,-,:..,,i 1-- Lip,-! .. ,•::1,,i..•''',,,,Liiq.',,,,a',..4-,g,a,s „-i4.;•,i:*11:.-i llitc If.."'.',. , .--:flfs.:,--9.3.-'.1!.••1-„,1,-J"w',7-, = C, vi'i',-,•,••'•-,.-''',>26'',LI-..1.t.' ••,,..,•4404-41q- '..1-tyl,j....„,r!,,e(rt.la,,.74,',--1,31,1,:......‘•,..,..1,1,11k,..-...:AttV.,_7.•411: r,:4 i 1,'•,-.,.,''*.:;.,.,.! ,:t-,4-4.,,,,,7',.,',"All;-,e-,,ift,Y,,11"4, .1-,-1-' 1 "t v.-z,'-)11--":'' \,,"'t•it'41:41--'?4,'-'; ',':-Y o = ,314-;?-‘ ...4,V.4.: ''-';',.11.!,:-.L%.,-.;-441^I'".4.'t,:-1,..,-;11r-'i- t7-:.--'-':'&;•?, k...1'"i*tf*,11'1444:,' . , C:1_ [1:4'1!,tr,,i.--,,,p,. .'11-1,,,",k0, `,/?,;{1,:k;rt,2'..C,--S,,-,,: i.,,,,-,,f*1. ; ::,j,1,t-ta,'T I,'4i,,,•141.l'_. .tst.,,-,.t,i,;•,:°-i-cit13-..--„J.,„,..„,,_;.-41-lift-414,7e- u --,,,b --.., ‘,,, ,,,..'4,1't,"7,i7,7.--e'J'•,, ,,I1,-,,,--.,.,.:-.,1-.17..,-,,d,„1,,,1.,...1 1,Crt g-3.4.,,_4(-4,-,-.:.-, ., ,,,,-, ,..,..v.., ..-.,1. .-,.. ".t.i.-.41-„,„,a-,.-iv.t..--vki,r1 1,„ 2„1.1,4:-..,,mti ,,,,, ‹.C. ,_,•'...z.,.-.L. .14-1•;,5:%..„-‘,;:r1,ik 9, lv,,p-,k .'_-,5.5-,,,,-.4A '''•is'1)414 1;'-`7:,,4',..V' ,--4 .1,-, ,,.,.v> ;Fitt:2 k, ,•:44,, = ii-::,•ift...,:;,..,_-_- ityg,";-N!ef iit.41,,ii„.ty -•4,14-1. ... •i lirg.:_i.tif.:,::•Li_ , 1,..01-,,,141,,likld F. -41,11),+ ,. ,.,•-:-. ,i-s,,,, -4'.-Q' ,.--. :•.'lir''''T'j'''' Al4ii-l'A oLifni;;041 .., 0,.1i 4,--,03,,,4,0 /:it -.-ri,V ,,1;:l.----.,.-=- . i . , 4-::; :•a,„.,-4,t 4 , iAtkloY:ilt.,441k40..-4%wi4.,,,•:,,, ,-9 ,II:1‘..A,',.53 ,2t,,„. ,-•'., 1-- 41Vilfrlig.-:!... ; 1'itc,'-'?,, 1111 -•zt,iftai •L4,,'.:'' ,.,'.'44-tt4,., kik.:;:c;:_;.:1 I.;t,...':' -iriTilt.4,4f.p. ;*,5CtAlie42. St,.`s";:. i,'', •':... -,•i!-'•--:{s5.4,1,ii :- ----1-0 1;f,1.4:9:-41•X'4,-R..:t„,_''''S•- , . .;-4.k.-*.q,it.. .1;1::•'-,:!,,',-:I, -Z400401 : .`±', 1 t . . , .1.:,4iY•:.,?- 534 ,...-,,li, --•., fklIt,',111,5.'_.:--„,, 11,,,,;..;,.,-,A, -,,...44&,2 ‹ !:,..0,14,:y.,N ,! --..-.1 ,,,t,, ,,„„- -,1"..f Vv.t,,...t.,i."..4Kek-t:-4.-11"''-z-",-..-•t ,,, .1 cb ',.• ' (k• '"M . . , . ,--! ,--. , .4,-...,., A'1,±%.--Isk. ,!......,tit:ith,, :1,4%4•,,:z,,,.tjp4, ,, t ,:•...,kv, vi,g,,, •.,..a.... .;,..•,,..,- ••• N.,..„--,!.:'1•,'$-,..gpa'?":4;,•A--...,_.•--,---,' ,q.z4.'iss4.,. '.-- -•.,'.„';'',. 4:44 skm. ,,.• '.‘,.,. -. . -•: -'.,,,, .).,-, . .live:/.''':t- ,,-1-1. .•-• " :-. .,.-.1 . ., 4.,,,,st , ..1,. ,..-,.,,,,,:.-,;;..::,,-, _J ' i '! •-'t..it31;',,,ly'.IA ti;'-:::;Wffift;,4.7'.' '4•itr'..:,:flz, , '14•Ii]j), 7-5 %,-4,W7,4,04 , ,•,„i:,'',.,„'., ----bi .:z 411,11;f4 4-411 ,,,w,-;./.irl, 44,,..,;•., 14:.1.--;. fi?.'0,7t, ,_, --1`,••;.-fr.;:.-1',''N•I'-', ."•'';‘-'0iW. .'-'7.-' --11;1,4J'I'.&1*,,i '''''------....., \ pri-#.4..P4-e-1:11 '''0.1;1.7,4Wv, :'-'t4r!''.,0'!;147':'114 1(1%4',?,-0,•ki.---F,' :;.-.'-,,,--y,'-'s,-,1,,v :'-. „. .v21.4.z cm . , . 41"' 0044,-..70N,7.0-1/f Aii,..k Ali% %.•',.. a._.,,,'A-il,,,,a,t,_r,..-,,41t--:.,-,......,...-„..-4.p•..•,.!1.-.-:,.4,-..:4,T.H,w4i:.4—...'„7ia,„4v*-.'it4,,—,z,-'4_.,'--'•'i.fi,"i.-if.,,, .,1/4.,„.••.t.,X1,s.-.„,7,-.,,,.,,.,.:,„r-..4.,„,.I:i..-, 1.v )..•t•-v.-.?q••..,,-,...--T.,tr 1i,,.7_..,,FT,.,...,t,1s,A_,,.,V,_i,_•7,,-.ii,,TvA4P.,,v.,„,„i „1,io r.-0,,1,,.,,•-,i, ,,-1...•,„,i'7,,.;,..,,,f,,.i,;f‹,•.'•iA,,1 - - 4p 7,,.,,,,„r.:;..1,„,.r,it..,i.,,t t,,1.,v,k i:4•o.,1'„•..-7-i.4'.',.„)*-.=,,;,"a,1 t1,z"-.o4-,:.•.N....• ,p.1'.:;C.I,•-.O--g.„0 -.-...,.T .., 44 a1 „ ' it "z' -,t',N-.,%a,,,2...-.,•0r•..,_:*-„' .''4,2.4-,,e.,4„,i;..•_f,•1-1P,4__;.-.4,P—,,._ \ X ir•,,,,.,, -.: 2_)1 . . .i,I•, .. 'i... „ . . - .. V) • C) , - V) \ . ' ` � ! MAP- 40 / jig WNW ^n � ^n � V. 71 �c ~~ ~ � ~. 'r 1z ! cc � uu ' cc QN, CA � ` L NO UQA . � OWNon / ^=~ 1 0 ' . ' ` � | ' / 04- MR Ai ' � i ` — : . - . i . 17# .LIOIHX3 • • , . . . • .i • ... , . - . . .. 1 1 11 1 r.:„'!0 '...-.. - .." :1,03:.1,Atf1497 0 . . .... , AV I IR* • 1V iiNINVO 9 EA :____,,, • ., .--• cti-,77,LIF --;,:-.9.Ara4 ,,,,,,,-,1 .. Aeatlik Uil P j;Mpi 414924Vd lidrudP! p.........::::::... ce.,:z.,,x,-„,,,.. - • ,.....—.......----„........i • .-....— , c ''. .------.. 1:4 Hrvri ,R,1 1J .,... - — i...„ . . du,...,- , n_. .... Al.1 ktile,,4 1J1 i1V., .ii•I el MO 1 ---1 . , 1 . - t''''''N) , , /14/1 • 4... kilWV:1 ‘..41k)N;; L---1 ar:i Ellerta CL 3 tan -,-C.2- drat r72-4,3•ti3•37,"7:11:XfOriT2d4.,17-' . f / ( -. A Eir a .• • IT , ° .: .-,,.._;,... , . -.. .-. ..:::-.- -:.- - - .. . "•,- —/ t. '- ' ............— r:i al -. r- - , , ; ,.. , .• 1 ri __ r. ,I '.,:t¢• a , 0. . •-7) "c " .: •- :; • ' .• , / .f .f ' ; R • • f , [i i,,,,, " 0 ."......... .-e......-..--....z..2.,.:-.... -....-........---;.7.`...t.......--— • • / .. ,4 til - i ' --4:..-f.....---.....-...-/LJ.---1 i ' i 11 ..ii I -, .,,. • S. / i '— - - • ,..„-` cyz / 'V. •I tA c, Oft '•• • It- ''•*" ^.1,'.11. “ Ti ';•• .7. ••• • • .... '2.. •-• •.• e xa , 1 ' ( ..,“ - . .... ir A .. .... „, , . r . i .. / / / ii Ei -... > ,. crz--...\.,3$- - „ -. ...• ... -• 4 ......I., ... --i- '. . .. , I . 1 w . •" • ‘ •••••..,A---; - t_-,...: -'-‘./. ....-- • ''' ....,z,...4 . i....„ •• .., • . • ‘,, : '-'".:-.•‘..- • ' I 0 0 • n zie ..-t.,:• • t..i I • zz tr ,tt,z, 4.1 al c .1 • __ ,,, ..-:.-t',,\ ' •..‘,.:, , -- / ' ' ._ — 1 t --_..—... _. , - \..,......'k....._ _...--).7..%.,--. , .. ' ' -,7 -11.1 d. .,. ,- , PI ' il c , ,-. ," s it c 7-: , ..--•,;.: - •-:.:... ' '‘)", --, • ._--, / i i ii . / 4, -, ..._..:_.....___w .,.., • .• -- . / / • r i . ." i 4 . H----" .. t • I 10 -01-12''' S r-!0IF' , i : '. , t44 0 ./ filit "..I •W.I -..-..,, f'1 1 L P 4'4?•7 °I'3,1V•PI"'j - . •.'l • U C NZH - ' ./ • ,:',';' ,,,,,, ,„ r. A • I i / ,' rj i ......,L-:.-;-:.:•:-:•:-:-:•:exi4:::‘,E:°:::S:' .,'..: / • .- . .. • a ,......:-:•:•:•:•:-:::•;-%•:•:•:•:•:•:::::::::::..;-%.*:: ',...".. • ; 1 4.1 pa 1 , , ....:..v:,:v4:::::::::::::::::::::........'...1......•:°:•:.:•:"....'?..... / 1 ' • t • f I . I • r LI , A .,.....,,I.,,:.:...::::::: :::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::•:•::::::::::::::::.,,,::•: ...':,:: ,,,,,Talikrm-sirt EL,.,.2,cz•rr„;,.,',-,•-....at-.Tz.-A-17, f-I • -.5•••••,-,,,-,E=P-<5r02z,.,,,E,t0 Z 1'•:.C.°r1..,,-„,,,r...,-„-...•,-';a•.:...:::•..••:r.s-•:.:•..- 4r sr• ...:0•:17:.<-:n.1:3•..,•.:...,:...::,•.:,.r.•:.:s:•.:'rt..•:..'•.,z:,.•-,::•::-.:::•:•:O-.::::0:f•::;%,..-.:":4^.7,,,.o.,:::•e:C:,.'t-:-.,::,..';..••.:6V1.-..,4 c..„4•.1•::,k•-ir::V:,".:,•'.:.•.„$•:,...'..&3..-.`.'.r.t::f 0,.4„_I,:.i,,.-S.,.:..:i:;.:,:rr4.:.„.:116„0,.6:4:,.A:40,e.;".,449:.:.4,:•0.:.)*•4:*.4:•:1,.7t.•0±Vz•t..1.I04;%.•.••.,.,S."V•t'o*o':'k,.":::*::.e:.:NzV:.•:v.:s_•:i:t.c!•::s:N.:$/:..:-i 14:0*i*,-4.r..•.*..,:*.",4,T*o.-elv••'l•t:‘Ir,V'A'0.trA.:• ;1 ..e . 2el0,.%!e.:'7",*.f:::..i;••j x:,•''')''g,-,3-••2 1'.'`. l" . r 0 ti K4 ? & *: x 04 ,.'.,•,Ir....''...::'..,.t: ..'. ;.,,• • -Ed AW.1:wIrmw- ,-• IN,iN,::$4.0.,0.„,,,t,,t, . ri: vi'' ,PZ't -. .:: • . •'z:' ' •,* 7 . i ,B\V 8:::*.:;.,%•;;;;;;;:ni;"' ,,`:-r*S , d ' •, , • i"-tr•:+•••';'"•••-•••*.P . .0'4'0'0 4,1:4.0". . t -, , •vir, 7.*,--, =4".....0•.•.•:-:%,,r. • *06,let•••'..2.1e0%. t , ..70•7404400.1k*:"r 4 -,:: ' '1' *!. i, ,,,c ,,."'7;STgtrt,itklike', : ',s,. t'k::1,s:•:•::::,.1:•:•:.:• •' •''''• V.A....T•PLI,O..•••••••Q• %Pt -014r itix:-.,11-4.-k*ri--:Al ..:•:.: V / / / • `. ,4.„30.,/,,.: llaa:m24;it.: , ks:::::::::?-1:if:--•:,-%. - . .i41''35:*a'-...:4*.k.;:i.......iitt?I'...,4%:;:**,.2 -4. , , , .. ..( ''.,y-vot,`,4....t.M414:11alti- ,...i4:iii:::%.„,:::.I 'liet..,--:•.,';•i*.o...ov,Algots,,,,••4:1* rf;,.;!•0,„T.1.4 '.,:•,: 7,1•.00.;ktvs.:. ; ek.,,,,p44,0:44::.,- - :•.:i.,,Ap-t • ,k) ,,,,,.. ,,4,4•4::::::Ott*,*-,w.'04,i;• '..0:',7:#'-,•',.4° :•-•••;. Li 11 a'.Of 4:tt.",:e0443.4M..4.„ e:._ •:•,./i',41.::71T.01' 'f0.4exl:Sicol,.§:4$1Mg.'1$>,.bNit,,,`44, :•. ; ll I iEik,11:,:$:*,•:1::. ,4*.A....,.‘kt#::::1:...4,.,.0 Z:Ner.t.:We? 11‘....q'AiS,R,*...t/k....*VAY:41... ..• .k.g q'.?fi?., '- . • .;,.! • ,,-•1.4,4.14411.,4„ ,:;Fs4.0. '. ::::.-:-.h..r.,.::::::::, p,v,.,,. 4.;,.00.4.4.0,4 .4",.. .30,01,,,.),,e„,,,.. ,........7.:>: ' • , A N„,. ,I.., .:I A, ••:•.:!...,•::::'.X.::::... ::.‘... .• b1.0itel. er:P.N '' " ..••••••:•••••f::::::.:::::':: . t...:: 0 I 4 't.,024f0:r•:0 titk. !,....;t4r...,, ,1,-P.::: :;c::::-.:::::..::;::: :::::::.,.....„ ,„,.....0„,,,,,x,...v*:•:•:•:;:::1::::::-....%::',:-:,;:',-:::‘,.;::..:::.:.,,,:::-.,:c. ,;0..,,,t i.,...,:d.1::,, 4, ,1:,,,,.. ,,,, :F.,,,,„-.61--*::::, .::.••„::::::::::.:.:$5:z.::i:::::::::::,::?:•::::::::::::::::::::,i:,:,:i*K•:::::::::1,:::::: :,70• .*:;,:%‘:. -r.57.".:7•:•: ::"::' k. 9.';$,,,*4,...-:4,A,1,1,4;.:., : ;?: ...:„.!.ili,:,:i:;;, •:::..,:K.,;:xf.;.:,:?:::::-::,:i:.2:::::,,-;::i*i*:;::::::::::::::.*i:i::-Ri:i:i:::.,:•:::::::::::::::::;::::,i;a: .., '... Zi , ,, „„„--#...,,, ,,t.,,i,. it, i,,,,...41,‘„,w.„.) ,,,,,,,..., 4,,,..,:„..,,,,:.,:;:.....,„...›..:-..„.„.;.;::.:,.:,:,../.....-.......-:-:-:.-:-:-:-:,-1.....-..:,:-:-:-:-:-•..,k,..--:..- :: -,,, ..4.AT, 1 ; .. m >0.:::•,\.?;.;,:::.:,:.;.:.:.;::.::::,_"•:-:,x.:•x•:.:•:-::::::::::f...*:°:•:•:•:•:-:•:•::::1:::::::::::;::-:•::%:,t:';:::::,.y: . '1.'j 4:11/44..,44;',7 4 AZ'..11., 4,..44;:,",t,N....:...t4okke:.if 11,', - :::::11::40::.:::::::::::::^:::*41;5::::,:::::::::::::;::.NN:.:::.::::::::::::::.::::::.`eX.::;°:••;e::.:.:X:w.:"•',.,:•::.4„%: '•''',' ii „INN.:.'4.4:7,,?,.,p -,;,t ,,-,v,„, .„4.0„tok„,„..,,,,e ..,,,:.,„w..:r. .; tit,„, . ,,,,,,;.....:: ::,:::::::„...:.....:.::::::::::::::::::,.:::::::;.:.;.,:.:::::::::-::::::::::::::-:-:::-:-:::-:;:::-:-:::-:-:--:-:-.,-,---, --• ,:f:' -• c'zt"1 W, '..,R;-'w.. ‘Atpots.t:, 1 ..;i:::::: ::: :::::::::-:::::::: :::.z:,,:::•:::::.:•.::::::::::::::*:::::::::::::.::::::::::::,:•::::::::::::::_::::::.::i:,:s.:31,.:- ':.;' ,,,' : •9,,,,,,t ,..,.-'.0.-4,-- -,-: ,,i,.....= 2, .,,,, to:t.-0:10,.,. .-:-:-:,,-; :-....:.::::::::::: :-:.-r-:*-,:,,:::-5•:::•:•:..:•:.:•:•:-:-:•:-:•::::•:•:.:-„,-.:::.:::::•:•:•:-..--,--;,,,:•,:-..-- ..,,.- I:1 t01...101;;SA.1.;',..",:if,:,14*.t.;-... :,. v.....i'' :,..,::‘,47,4%; .:,ii:iii.:.:;i:i.:3::-•:.*:4:::.::::;i*i:,:i:::::.;;::::::::!:.):;.x.:-:.:.:.:::z.:::::5:•::::::,,,w7-- ....:,: Pv I.w+4;:okc: 41:RR.4..:P* r•••;,:::;:-::::::::::,:e.•(•!-!..' ' " ,- . , ‘...,,' N „er•••,--, ,...,,...,,,. .„,.. - ,...„,,,.....„,.,...„,:„ ..„,:::,...„,, ,,„ . . .,,. , . : • ,,,,,,-, ,,. ., ,••. .6.. :., ,, , , ,4,........,„„ ,,,._• • ••. ,. ,...• cs. ,,,'7' .41.•;41 •. •.0%ft: 7"),s• , . . 1' . •t.,....OP. . ,. 1 : •-• . . ..,, :' : __.... "•-''''-4 ''.. W.....toot.•$;$, ,,t1.:,,,gk Vii4-• •••• -4'',Iv.• •,, _ . ,,„,....,'' '®6 y.41:**•:e0INNV.47.2.•Drre:fi"V irc.t•Th r•- "s•••n =S ."'`$' .....a.L.---• ..,...,......".•'• . .'1..0 "."' 0 '-•-••711----"--' -''"- / "•-••••-•"'—''''",---'-'""•-••"•1*--: -' ' : 11 4,10 s',::;.:,..4. „,..., ,,.,., 1 :etc v : 5 SolLIVDIStr,s Zliatig to C4, L '-'..)____L_ i • ..c.., ...,lt 41% ..-4, 0 .1c7'-e• -77o,.1.6T •'''` - _ , fil ?N . , 'N.'A. 4.'•.1.f 0 c; .. -. .I r cr'r t';', ,,,, .,,,,-,,t . NI, . . - 65./49 '''Y' ----"rt —r1- 4SIFF77—H, 'tet:) 't---' —`"' i , , [1 ri,d_A,-,..,?,$,40L.-0 .1.11.1q: '1 bl • -I - f-f-tiorzi ly.4.,! ,4 ,., .c.1 I sfz,s-,ti,a,•.A-1F;;) rii Fi -... c' ,ez•-..--..‹ ---, , ,,,,,,• „.0„,...11.„,..........-:-:r-r/cc i ...........,, • . ,,, '' 6;1,145VP t :;: . :..— ., ... : : :•'...• I b . ....,ja 9. 4, CS q• •••,'''''' 1,4V IP,L -..." % '''. 4,-1..1 ". ''451...,....,...:... Li, ..• : • -....••: .:-.;: : . ,ii,,,• . . IA V fd..„0 . . . . , Ws ,,....... ,,,,,,J , ,i „.,,, 4.3 'ql.?:v-,}' 4, ,S1. 0.1 ,,,,,_ 4 ,li...,, .... . r, , ,.-4, -,,,,,,,,,,,, „ -.- c,,,,,, . 4.. . • • ki-----s.hmsriyd614,o3 il I , . . ... 4., . g . ... . , .,..0...;-__,.,..- ,.,„,....-.. .... ,.. "--y. #1.N..."11(".., 0 ''' ''''',•',.'s ''''' e I :C'l ''''''t.'"..'ilt. g cR. • ,D,1, ..,-1L-„."...qz 1a. ‘ ..•.-%-,./-.-w7..7... ..- •• • . , • c „ ,...... .. / k. .__ - - , = r. • • i ,-;.0,,,,,,•,r) : •: ', ”: '... : . 160: ir,] ,71--swi,I t V 6 c'' .,.., .,..5f,,Z.-i.' i.-...(111.V3,} � � Co ca 7-77 14 ell pi ff— cjx res G" General Cl, ki PROPOSED USE Future COmmercial tis e of LAND USE PLAIi—bledium EXHIBIT #5 .. ., � - •,, ew An (0 . . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , FILE NO : R-272- 79 JANUARY 23, 1979 PAGE FOUR _ . . . 3. The subject property isa portion of a larger G zoned area which currently prOvides a separation of B- 1 zoned parcels at Duvall and Sunset, from similar B- 1 zoned parcels • at Union and Sunset. To the north and south are existing developed R-3 parcels . To the east and southeast are vacant -• R-2 and SR ( King. County) residence areas . To the extreme • •• • southeast is Hazen High School . The Comprehensive_Plan identifies "minor retail centers or neiTTEZThOod shopping • • • -ffigt-r- .77/71-1-157e—rocated near perimeters of severaT-- . FITIghborhoods and at the nterSeectionearaajOr_ro_iiis Jana- , - and dFferiaTs '--Trhasis .added ) ( Land Use Report , 1965 , • t'amercial , page IL ) . Approval of the subject rezoning would. . conflictAlith this goal in that it would create a • . cOtiriuous : stripof commercial activity from west of Union AvenueeN . E . to east of Duvall Avenue N . E . Such strip • , commercial . deVelopment would encourage small scale commercial et- uses inviting numerous driveways , high traffic -cirCulations . and increased turning movements . This situation would appear to directly conflict with the Arterials and Streets Plans • Objectives (page 3) : . . • , . "a . Provision. for safe , efficient and covenient movement • of peoples and goods . "• • "b. 'Arterial --- latterns---complimentary to the general land use plan . " • "c . Adequate and safe access--- (for) efficient utilization . " • 4 . The ComprehenSive Plan clearly indicates a separation of land uses in this area including buffers between commercial • uses and between commercial and single family areas . The subj ( • property is identified as being •for Medium Density Multiple Family or R-3. zoning . The R-3 District would provide' for approximately . 110 dwelling units on the subject site . 5. The land use designation Of Medium Density Multiple Family . appears to be consistent with policy statements of the ComprehensiveTlan , including " In medium and high density residential use. districts---other compatible uses may include-- shopping districts and other functions which are not detrimental to the maintenance of desirable living conditions . ' (Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 ) . 6 . It should also be noted that the Comprehensive Pldn states that residential uses provide for preservation of "natural • features and amenities--- (which ) should be utilized to best advantage for the use and benefit of the community . " (Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 . ) The site with its centrally located stream and interior stands of firs lends itself to a w . 1 designed residential use . Preservation of the stream and vegetation is crucial to the attainment of the highest and best use of the site . 7 . The Fire Department indicates that the proposed use must meet fire flow hydrant location and access requirements of the Department. • 8. The Engineering Division has noted that upon future development that Anacortes Avenue N . E . must be improved and dedicated and that storm water retensioh and ,clean-up of Honeydew Creek is required . 9 . Other departmental comments are attached for consideration . EXHIBIT #6 • 4 ,/ , • fri, R 2-79 Page Five •,,,, Land Use Report) . Multifamily zoning of R-3 would be an ". . .effective control of . land use. . ." and ". . .promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability. . ." (pages 17 and 18, Objectives No. 4 . t) and 6, Land Use Report) . :. : .... . • • _ • , .. • . ,e • . . 2. The Planning commission and City Council in approving the 1977 amendment to the • Comprehensive Plan (Exhibits n and 4) were concerned about the potential of strip- commercial development occurring between Union Avenue N.E. 7.1- . Duvall Avenue N.J . .. ..,:.... . . • along N.E. Sunset Boulevard. A commercial node exists atGo intersections with transitional commercial and various uses occurring in between. To separate the . thenodes a buffaarnaffia-bensity Multifamily Residential land use was placed upon the Land OY:6-7F-apdirectly across the subject site. . . While .the merits of this action are not the subject of this public hearing, it is • clear that almost two yarkrs ago the policy-making body responded to concerns and • ' exercised land use principles and planning. Testimony did not assert or document that public or priVate improvements in the area have occurred since then and impacted - ,.. • . the subject site sufficiently to warrant reclassification of the site to anything beyond R-3 (Section 4-301.4. (C)) ... ; %• • . . • ' 3.• Due to the concern of the Planing Commission and City Council regarding potential • strip-commercial development along k.i,E. Sunset Boulevard in this area (Exhibit '43) . . a reasonable conclusion is that during their discussions and public hearings potential . . future request for reclassification to 13-1 of the subject site Was considered, however slightly. Additional study of land use in the area was recommended, but their . . opinion appeared to be that commercial developMent was not appropriate for the subject • site. The Comprehensive Plan goals. and objectives seem to support their action 4 (Section 4-301 . (A)) . . . . . - • • . . . . ' do Honey Dew Creek running through the property should be protected and incorporated _ . into development plans on the site. . This natured feature will enhance ". . .community livability. . ." for prospective residents of the site (page 17, Objective No 2, , . . Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . However, the existing condition • of the ,creek on the property indicates that additional study of the attractiveness and interface with other properties is needed prior to.reguiring that it be retained. Another natural feature of the subject site is the substantial trees that exist. For the aforementioned reasons, these trees should be retained as much as possible for integration into the development. RECOMf,E.NDATION:. • Approval ot R-3 supject to retention of the existing substantial trees and Honey Dew Creek if plis4b1-eand, desirable upon review of specific site development. . . . ORDERED THIS 6th day of March, 1979. ) . , . •• ,„-Z-.:4_ t,.,. ,,,-- . . . . - L. Cck Beeler . . Land Use Hearing Examiner • . TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of March, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties • of record: • • • . Larry Brown, 2112 3rd Avenue, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 9E3121 Anton i; Millie E. Althoff, 9610 Titon Drive, Seattle, WA 98117 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of March, 1979 to the following: ' • Mayor Charles Jj. Delaurenti . Councilman Richard M. Stredicke . Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director • Gordon Y. Erickson, Planning Director .• . ' Ron Nelson, BLilding'Division , Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney . . . . . : • ' Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the Citys Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 20, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision Of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the • . . . . . EXHIBIT #7 —: — e---) (.: .- -_ ---.. . . ;,) ) --. . 04. , . • _ . March 6, 1979 e2 • ee b.-- ..A . . 0 /0 m. 4 ' . . '' '• .EFILEALDELED USLHEAR1.NG EXAM I fIER . . V . . - CITY. QUM' . .. . . .. . ,..,., : . . . . .REPORT -AND RECOMMENDATION TO THF RENTON CITY COUNCIL. . . .• .. . . . . - ' APPLICANT: ' Anton & Millie E. Althoff -FILE NO. R-272-78 • LOCATION: On the southwest corner of Sunset Boulevard N.E. and Anacortes Avenue N.E. SUMMARY or REQUEST: Applicant seeks approval of a rezone from "G" to 13-1" to permit future commercial use of the subject site. ' . , . '.. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Recommend approval to R-3 zOne. RECOMMENDATION: . .'.,..... " " .::. Hearing. Eximiner: . Recommend approval to R-3 zone. .. ,. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' ' The Plannihg Department staff report was received by the — ee REPORT: . ' Examiner on January 18; 1979. A subsequent addendum was .._. . received on February 21, 1979. ...:s . .. • . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining ....... , .. : available information On file with the application and . . .. - . . • ' n field checking the property and surrounding area, the . e• e• . - .: ExaMiner. 66nducteda. public hearing on the subject as . Y . . follows: :•: e.. * . , • ' . eee ,e--• • . - -. e . . • . . ,- • . ..- - • . . .. . . . . The hearing was opened on qanuary- 3,1979 at 9:25 a.m. .in the Council Chambers of the .t:'•': Renton Municipal Building: David CleMens, Associate. Planner, • advised receipt of a 'request for continuance from the applicant, and the hearing was subsequent/y,continued : :. tO 9:00 a.m. on February 6, 1979.. .:: :. . . . . . • , ' , • .. • . . V 'CONTINUANCE: • ; • ' The hearing was opened on February 6, 1979 at 9:00. a.m: in the Council Chambers of' the .Renton Municipal Building. David CleMens, Associate Planner, indicated that a second *continuance had been requested by the applicant to allow review and possible revision of the application. The hearing was subsequently continued to 9:00 a.m. on February 27, ' . 1979. • CONTINUANCE: V . . • iThe hearing was opened on February 27, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. . Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. • ' It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, dated January 23, .1979, and the subsequent addendum, dated February 27, 1979. The reports were entered into the record as Exhibits #1 and 2, respectively. . .. • • . ' . . David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibits #1 and 2, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #3: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, File No. 390-76 (by reference) .• • Exhibit 44: - Comprehensive Plan Map for the Subject Vicinity •• ' Exhibit .05: Zoning Map for the Area between Duvall and : e Union Avenue N.E. .: - . :',,.. : .• . • , . Exhibit.,•P6s. . Map of Existing Land Uses in the General Area : :; • of the Site Mr. Clemens advised that Exhibit #3 was the result of specific Planning Commission and City Council action regarding commercial uses of the area in question, and the amendment of the Comprehensive Plan had been approved on March 9, 1977 by adoption of Ordinance No. 3112. . ,Mr. Clemens indicated receipt of site end landscaping plans submitted by the applicant. . . , ) I-- ( ., Page Two , . . . ,The Examiner advised the applicant that conformance to submitted site and landscaping plans • may be requireA if included in the -rezone file, and inquired if the applicant preferred . withdrawing the plans or enteringnthe plans with the understanding that they are conceptual . ' : in content. Mr. Clemens indicated that although the applicant may wish to address the matter in subsequent testimony, he f4t that review of the conceptual site plan was o' necessary due to its importance 'injustificatien of the proposed rezone. The applicant agreed that the plans could be reviewed conce6tually, and they were entered as follows: _ . • • . . ' •. Exhibit 07:n.Conceptual Site Plan • • ". .. • . : . . . . . . . . .. . . Exhibit ft3s Conceptual Landscaping Plan . ; . ' . . . . , , . • Mr. Clemens referred to a letter attached to Exhibit N received from the applicant which ' requests application amendments to reduce the rezone of B-1 to one acre in lieu of the • previous proposal to rezone the entire four-acre parcel. The letter was entered into the record as folio by the Examiner:: '. . . • • . • • . . . . . . . . . ' ' . • , - . .. Exhibit Letter Planning Department. from . . . • ' Western Pacific Properties, dated . , . . . . .. . • '. ' - ' February 6, 1979 . . . . . . , . . ' • . • . . . . .. . . . . . Clemens advised that clarificatien' of the word, "narrative, " contained in Exhibit g9 ' . had'been received :from the applicant to refer to conceptual site and landscaping plans. He noted the preference of the Planning Department to discuss the entire property during )-e• the rezone hearing instead of the one-acre parcel requested by the applicant. Mr. ' . Clemens submitted the following letter from the Public Works Department into the record: . • . . , . , . . Exhibit U.0: Letter to Hearing Examiner from Public . '•-. ._ . . _ e , Works Department, dated February 27, 1979 .. . . . . . . . . . , • Exhibit t10 recommended that access .to the site be directed to Anacortes Avenue N.E. instead of Sunset Boulevard, and required dedication of right-of-way on' the West side H of Anacortes Avenue N.E. to the City of Renton. . • • . , . . . . . . The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in. Exhibits #1 and 2. Responding was: . . . •. . . . Larry Brown . . 2112 3rd Avenue, Suite 401 ' • Seattle, WA 98121 . . . - . 'Hr. Brown indicated nonconcurrence in recommendations contained in the reports. Referencing Exhibit 010, he advised that dedication Of the right-of-way has already . occurred, and remaining requirements by the Public Works Department include installation of curbs, sidewalks and storm drainage upon development of the property. Mr. Brown supported approval of the rezone of the northeast portion of the property to B-1 to provide logical extensAon .of already existing commercial use east of the site in . ----- ._. orelatIonship to Sunset Boulevard, a state highway. He reported that demographic figures V indicate a three:mile populattantpf 55,000 and a five-mile population of lio,cloo from —„ —......._ . ---......lent the subject property. Mr. Brown advised the original choice of deveopmen7: site located at the northeast corner of Duvall and Sunset Boulevard was unacceptable due to receipt of information from the Public Works Department that sewers would not be available at the site and a septic tank would not be allowed; and the subject site was subsequently determined appropriate for the proposed development. Mr. Brown clarified the intent of the amendment to the application to reduce the size of the B-1 zoned property to one . acre at the northeast corner and the remainder of the property to R-3 zoning. He reviewed the currenttsieuirler commercial property to qg.gammoADIR retail slat:2Z, food • service business, savings and loan institutions, and banks. Mr. Brown felt the adjacency of the proposal to the existing shopping center on the corner of Duvall and Sunset. Boulevard would provide compatibility with the proposed use by McDonald®s Corporation on the subject site and create less impact upon utilities than multifamily residential use. He also advised willingness of the corporation to enter into a 25-yearjease contract with option for an additional 25-year lease which would ensure stability of use in the area. Mr. rarcrvm questioned the desirability of locating residential units directly on a primary -state highway with a traffic volume of 20,000 vehicles per day. While he agreed with .-the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to provide a buffer between commercial development, he objected to the location of the buffer on the applicant's property which 'negatively impacts its development potential. Mr. Brown emphasized that the potential user of the property had indicated willingness to restrict access onto Anacortes Avenue N.E. in order to comply with the intent of the Comprehensive' Plan to discourage provision of numerous driveways onto a major arterial. i.e noted that at the time the Comprehensive Plan amendment was adopted, the existing shopping center at the corner of Sunset and • , . . . . . . ,2z17," qkV _,J • R-; .79 Page Three Duvall was not constructed or anticipated, and the proposal bears a natural relationship ' to the pedestrian and traffic flow which is currently generated by the large commercial center. Mr. Drown advised that although the City has indicated that 60% of properties designated a) for coalmercial use are still undeveloped, there are few actual available sites in the nfiTICTe7o encumbrances by utility lines and other factors. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no : response. Mr. Clemens advised that.the Comprehensive Plan amendment, Exhibit 03, specifically occurred to provide for development of the shopping center on Sunset and Duvall, noting that the applicant was the developer of the property. Referring to • Exhibit 404, he designated potential commercial use prior to adoption of the amendment which originally included a.portion of the northeast section of the subject site. • Mr. Brown inquired regarding designation of potential zoning on the Comprehensive Plan . .. . prior to adoption of. the amendment. Mr. Clemens indicated that it would appear that the • Previous Comprehensive Plan:designated an oblong-shaped piece of commercial property which included part of the northeast corner of the subject property, although the entire parcel had been zoned "G" since annexation, Mr. Brown indicated his opinion as a result :..of' reviewing the Comprehensive Plan and contacting various staff members that the frontage . .. ...of the subject site provides good potential for commercial use. He inquired if the property owner was sufficiently apprised of the public hearings regarding the Comprehensiv • Plan amendment in the area. Mr. Clemens. indicated that required legal publications had . appeared in the newspapers although further review would be required to determine if individual letters to property owners .had been sent. He noted that a petition containing li signatures and• a number of letters had been -received trom property.....aulezrs_jn_the ar.ea •• . sup2p.EZAng....commaaial development on Sunset Boulemass], The Examiner advised that although sufficiency of public notice was not a subject of the public hearing, it appeared that legal requirements had been met by the city. • • Mr.' Brown reiterated his opinion that the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan -13 to provide a general guide to development and reflects the general needs of the people at the time of adoption. He felt that development of the .shopping center on Sunset Boulevard impacts the potential development of the subject site in its related proximity, and since commercial use had at one time been designated on the Comprehensive Plan, such use would . be appropriate. . . The Examiner referenced Section L. (Environmental Assessment/Threshold Determination) of • Exhibit 41, which states that a deolaration of non-significant impact has been issued • for the rezoning only, and inquired if receipt of the site and landscaping plans would eliminate the need for further environmental review. Mr. Clemens indicated that although the subject of preservation of trees.had been addressed in the proposal, thequestion of. incorPoration of the azdstino creek into future development plans would require...I:WTI:57T- -roview at the time of development; althouallle noted that the declaration of non- • significance wouia not he crucar-n review of that issue. ---____ • • The Examiner referenoed: Section .N.2: (Planning Department Analysis) of Exhibit 01, regardinc • ' Comprehensive Plan -review of the general area, rand inquired if the amendment specifically • : •considered the subject site and whether Or, not commercial use should extend west of ▪ _HAnacortes Avenue N.E. . Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. • 1 The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. Mx. Clemens indicated that the recommendations contained in Exhibits 01 and 2 would remain ▪ as presented. • . • The txaminer requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. • P.-272-79 was closed by the Examiner at 1005 a.m. • • FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS E RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the _ • Examiner now makes and enters the following: : • * FINDINGS -1. The request is for reclassification of 3.82. acres of "G" zoned property to one acre • of D-1 and 2 .82 acres of R-3 property. A fast food restaurant is proposed on the B-1 property. • • •. . 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applic-Ible policies • and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and • • is hereby attached as Exhibit 01 and incorporated in this report by reference as set . • . • forth in full therein. • • • • . • • • . _ l r �,) R-27_ :a e _'cur 3`e '.Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State En zror ental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. . 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance :" .'.' has been issued for the subject proposalEricksen,�� . .based upon by Gordon Y. rest-c,nstie official preservation of significant- trees and incorporation of the existing . creek into future development plans in a manner satisfactory to its natural character. " 4• Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by. all city departments affected by the impact of this development. , ., . 7 • 5-::•;.'There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 5, .:All existing utilities are available 'andin close proximity. ) The Comprehensive Plan amendment cbmpleted in March of 1977 (Exhibit #3) appears to . have specifically considered whether or not the commercial designation on the Land Use .Map should be extended Westward across Anacortes Avenue N.E. to include the :subject property. Review.of the Yecord of.this 'amendment indicates that consideration :'•was given by the 'City Council 'and Planning Commission of buffering commercial designations by medium'•densityi multifamily uses (Exhibit 44) . Some assumptions were .'made:at the:beginning of".iinalysis"•cjf :the amendment, but the testimony' has not claimed ': or documented that these'assumptiozis'have changed relative to the subject application (Section 4-3014..(A) ) : . :- •The' Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Exhibit #4) indicates the property to potentially :-be Medium Density Multifamily. Residential (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . , Testimony did not address whether or not significant improvements in the area have occurred since the 1977 land use analysis (Section 4-3014. (C) ) . • )NCLUS I ONS: .. • ','' The proposed B-1 zoning does' not appear to conform to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map; however, the map is not intended to be a' "blueprint" for development but a :, generalpyaide (page 2, Section 2, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area, duly, 1965, and Ordinance No. 2142) . The more specific goals and objectives of the Ccmprehensive Plan apply but are not abundantly clear regarding this application" Upon considering together the Land Use Map and goals and objectives it seemed that the map is an ..accurate interpretation of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Sufficient direction exists in the Comprehensive Plan to support reclassification of ' the entzr_e_nrga rty +,,. R-1 (Section 4 3014. (B) ) . --- Demographic information and the proximity of the northeast one acre of the total • property (that proposed for 8-1) to the adjacent Central Highlands Plaza (Ernst- :Malmo, Pay 'n Save, and Albertons) and southerly R-3 development seem to adequately indicate that a fast-food restaurant might do well at that location. But this locational criteria is not actually contained in the Comprehensive Plan for consideration by the Examiner. Land use control and land use principles are essentially the concern • in reviewing 'zoning changes. Not at issue is the existing Central Highlands Plaza Shopping Center and the cc.,unercial • node that has developed at the intersection of Duvall Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Boulevard. This is the existing situation adjacent to the subject property. The issue is whether or not the proposed one acre of B-1 is an appropriate •expansidn of this shopping center node. . e Although commercial uses are appropriate at this general location, H-1 zoning of the subject site would not be an appropriate expansion of the Central Highlands Plaza shopping area and commercial node since this would not produce a ". . .consistent and orderly development pattern." (pages 6 and 7, Section F. , Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area Report, July, 1965, and page 11, Commercial, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . Such zoning would not at this time constitute ". . .appropriate use of land. . .proper. . .land use principles, and. . .coordinated development of undeveloped areas." (page 9 and 10, Summary, Renton Urban Area Report) . The appropriate ". . .growth patterns. . . " are less intensive use than B-1 in the . .best interest of the community and. . .its overall attractiveness and desirability. . .",(page 17, Objective No. 1, and page 18, Objective No. 6, Land Use Report) . The multifamily zoning that is developed north of the site and across N.E. Sunset Boulevard should be carried southerly and across the site to connect with the multi- family zoning south of the site. This implements the Land Use Map and is an '. . .appropriate use of land. . .land use principles and. . .coordinated development of indeveloped areas." (page 9, Summary, Renton Urban Area Report) . Multifamily is appropriate at this location (page 11, Residential Land Use Report) . Preve,ition of °. . .incompatible. . . " strip commercial development and prevention of . .premature lecay. . ." would occur in an ". . .orderly growth pattern." (page 17, Objective No. a, ;`� • ' - ac-.:72-79 Page Five . Land Use Report) . Multifamily zoning of R-3 would be an ". . .effective control of . land use. . ." and ". . .promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability. . ." (pages 17 and 18, Objectives No. 4 and 6, Land Use Report) . 2. The Planning Commission and City Council in approving the 1977 amendment to the • Comprehensive Plan (Exhibits )}3 and 4) were concerned about the potential of strip- commercial development occurring between Union Avenue N.E. Duvall Avenue N.E. • along N.E. Sunset Boulevard. A commercial node exists a bo intersections with transitional commercial and various uses occurring in between. To separate the • . two nodes a buffer o ium ensity Multifamily Residential land use was placed • upon the Land Use Map directly across the subject site. While the merits of this action are not the subject of this public hearing, it is • clear that almost two years ago the policy-making body responded to concerns and exercised land use principles and planning. Testimony did not assert or document that public or private improvements in the area have occurred since then and impacted the subject site sufficiently to warrant reclassification of the site to anything .beyond R-3 (Section 4-3014. (C)) . • ' 3. Due to the concern of the Planning Commission and City Council regarding potential strip-commercial development along N.E. Sunset Boulevard in this area (Exhibit 443) a reasonable conclusion' is chat during their discussions and public hearings potential future request for reclassification to B-1 of the subject site was considered, however slightly. Additional study of land use in the area was recommended, but their . opinion appeared to be that commercial development was not appropriate for the subject site. The Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives seem to support their action (Section 4-3014. (A)) . . 4. Honey Dew Creek running through the property should be protected and incorporated into development 'plans on the site. . This natural feature will enhance ". . .community livability. . ." for prospective residents of the site (page 17, Objective No. 2, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . However, the existing, condition • of the creek on the property indicates that additional study of the attractiveness and interface with other properties is needed prior to requiring tl-at it be retained. Another natural feature of the subject site is the substantial trees that exist. For the aforementioned reasons, these trees should be retained as much as possible for integration into the development. RECOMMENDATION: Approval o R-3 s ject to retention of the existing substantial trees and Honey Dew Creek if po • and desirable upon review of specific site development. • ORDERED TIiIS 6th day of March, 1979. �i L. 'ck Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of March, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties • of record: • • . Larry Brown, 2112 3rd Avenue, Suite 401, Seattle, WA 98121 Anton & Millie E. Althoff, 9610 Titon Drive, Seattle, WA 98117 TRANSMITTED THIS 6th day of March, 1979 to the following: • Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division • . Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney • Pursuant to Title Ill, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 20, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the is ` • i . II • - • . • - Z - . i • .-• — l.O,-b-V % \/, .t',s - - . a30r !g,.. S;dv;,, '.. 7 8i / ,. a :%, 0.k.4? g xOMPNENE1 79 90 . .• r' fit: • . °6 . 4o tt .... .3,f�ra ti d• •n\•B'o i Z 9 i 1 .1._.. _ s_ ..8 /1_e as 8...0 ��.—J._4's l8_7,_,-4 T4.._( U' @' f �P 9• l aS 41—.1 ?.5,.•+.'ti+.S++i 'b�}.`,`�4'� uti•�.y',.,.,4%.,•.,:,..4.;' ... ,n _,'„_. ., J- „xr••,,ti: t: eila/ { 7 ,$••fSLs 'Y Y•1cY-'4 .,,,0, ,, 9 .i 4 7 &3 aJ;9e ,9 sZ o 9 o y + P +y•� ;l,�,'L,•�i'tr','::�.5 y'i.nr ,'i:-:.,i�'i+ if.•�i'4.y V•,.•- ''#�••.+�Z' '. "' 9 . ' ti,.s•{,:`S;:Y•,i � 4_p�y,'S �• hti'.�+s L;,,;.'' .w+.,Y�'ia•y'e;,•�'"s.�- ..,� _r I p.,r:+. ;:.M.s r,•rfi4'�++ j •L i+fi't�+y'IY +'.,.t�4�Y`'tiv �i ':•r 'v�,C• G. _ , '::•��°%`•° �••.•::::::.X,.:. 1••�Y..:A.'y ,31h y + 'S.Y+..?,v\ v 4 •+;,4"Y*''` •.•. ..•S.:• s. , a,5.:, �::. S.,:p y .•. f. .L +i i :. 4Y C•i '� C Y: .V w^ f' .4' Y Y :: , .; r fh. Y•�' .• r :5�. '•V •l: Y J s s.4 :eq{' •L4 .1f + L ••i• 4 4 ,++ .ti. •?'.�•4.:a:••-••�••••• • ::i:::: •••{•;..;+: � ;i:S:'�•S:�•i � xt',r . : SAS, • `< • ;J�y y •w tirr fY�, :iy} gS w-:.. ~-:}:;r�::' sr- <r s+++ R;�`"•::: 01 :4.::?" S � S^ 1 J�•• •.4 c f{,{: •+atia• :,i{1,2,3*+ji1+pY4, %•' :09- e i •:�.�• i:k.`+o+ti li•T 1::.1:0:,�S ti';. 70 hn N Y,••1'1'r:L.1 ,S k� :, e Y''}. �:$0:4 .Y+ . 1Nei • 4 4S i `�. :.i1..} : : T�. •� S• '•.Y • ✓ L1�"•:,._ .x � ,O` +�if4,y sst r2vY•rL+`:l i.+ rt$ Lf• %?L:1, 14:::::oif,�+.S?:::: r `. n kt:::'ax,vt}ro•y:*.:�,:fi�•::.:E`+:::9k / p3 ''+�j{+��5 hN rry 4.w4,y Y{ �Y}+i��;`fs Y qr'y W'Ci' .:J � �,4 • 4 .,4+'e, 4Y.'L. ;1°It -�.m—i^�§:i'k }S{1} : : } r 4':' 3 •s fits �Y . < *: .rY 1 - f t: Yr ,,:r x{?•4: Y YYY, . •Y1x '::•. ,:,3 Y c, ,Y ti dLy • '. : r y r ,:t. ►e„..{{v'1=4r��ith:, Y?{.n •.,,.y,r r.+�Y �f, • .- :P:� 1}' s+?>{. .::s rs+. t. s fi,,`+. Yyj ,: f�'.d fx:E:�L!.41,,•�..v.,•f,1LLJhr•, 4, • {,*:x �1 ,•4z ....0. •, ..1 S4 t N• v+•+ �•,: ,�,L+ il;,(`: �:$4.47av��?Ati�*y�• r+:;:c r:404' 4�i�t ;::::,�.'�i�,ti{,i• li .,.. Y • `f 1{� .m+,:•:*:'.•sns r, sar ,I . • �� s y�•Y t�' •,�` �7s�r.t +n• a� •� a•.•.:;:. v:4 1 •i ti2�1 s ° } i' • e. S �•r•:'•: i ,1 . , 1LC M i: **•: + f :: ' . A • . • •.:4$:.:m........:.:.:$2:4.....x .....,:...,44)*::.0.7.,r ...x.. :.:.::..:.:•;::„., ...., . . , i 1 . . " ... .. t.....:,:....e...,....c...; .x.„.4......x.v.3.,.... ..,.....„:::.:: ..:.:.:...- • In, .... _ __ -__ _._• - . .4,-, - --'. ' n------ ---.--1 -- - - -/- -/---- r ..+.•p•Y9{ 'O�'? .$-: 5 Vc.. .Ss "�- E Ei 9 Pr 9 Elm�9 G3 Gw rmarar...aa • �� ^-•�- 2 T -`' • '''', 1-1) ,.,,..-..,• • • • • • ,. 11 / / ) t. •• •— • . — M1.•^4 > + w3 ,.. Y: ., T .�r .:. 4.,..........,,,,:,, r--..-, 1..... ...: . . ........ i 1 I /I )11 . L,. .... . ,,, , ,• ., •. 1 .c:• ` •e' • 59 ;/O. 11' ?/ - ... am s 7. ate' •1 / .r/ ✓ i5..,•p_ ` : .s1N(/7- , , .Call 1 3. , erir vgrr4 ----'----' • ''') enuM I7fli4YfY IUL.1 h A litlf . ' t _-_ • ;�„ • x•xsA �oA C•P4IAL- . M Pt1614 le'/QL A51 171,i13 Wt. I • • • • • sx fil ft..,,x,..var • ._ • „.� 1 y E) 0 Ire '[L•l i • ' .�mm �� I F: 9 :A Spm L.. I ' . r.r � 1,_.,,,_ • rT H _ .4 . A t k5�ecy Cn .• _ ";I 8 _ i �.r • 'ip- ,'^ -,-,-'••il A 47 111 f`i I . 14 °' ;= ' 1 ::::.3.-.1)4 ifzi. •(2,,,I.fa-. i''''• ',,,..t$_;"; .,- .CC, f....SZZO C=D '-' l'' . g ii qT ^ ® 9 P . I.:t4 As gy _ ca;o•wo o°If_tm°: 0 9 v I m .6.w J • I a i Y G P� • 4- sly: w - ®`, r \ • { "° "�1/ a• •P/ I I \'`-----f..--.----- I � Qu 1 1 ,,, .—tnel •�waer' ° ye . ., i . pp • 1• • r• a. /--1t..:,_ • �',�Ir `ems• o c°�•�• 1`,, • . al 9q • o °., ,.1u,°• i,••' ., • • • Y1• _C.,• o .c.' iL ,�7•g®/: cl .Q y"w I... If c f fl f 4" • 11 1 •. ®' .I.0 w-+�%t ® cca am cas ca®cyo e.�• 6 • • 3 ..or. • • • r }©.a:a,: a9 8 ji I 0I. O .1 y \ z._ It • REZONE : • • ANTON ALTHOFF ^ R-272-78 f. . • • ? • _. • APPLICANT ANTON ALTHOFF TOTAL AREA ±3 . 82 acres t PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via et Elyd.. j_ EXIS1ING ZONING, °°G°, - General Classification. District „ EXISTING USE _ S$ngle Family/UndeYeloped t, PROPOSED USE Future commercial use of the site , r`' ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Fami1Y COMMENTS L Li PLANNING DEPARTMENT • SUPPLEMENT TO THE STAFF REPORT OF JANUARY 23 . 1979 February 27 , 1979 APPLICANT : ANTON AND MILLIE E . ALTHOFF FILE NUMBER: R-272-79 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: ' • ',. `. The applicant ' s initial .application was for a rezone from G to B- 1 to permit future ' commercial development of the subject site . The : applicant:.:;requested continuances of this ,public • hearing • to: discuss with staff alternatives to the original • applicati.on .. On' February' 6 , 1979,• Western Pacific Properties -. • (agents for -the applicant ) submitted a letter proposing to amend the .a.pplication:: to reduce the area from the original . .. .. four (4) :.acres (total . parcel ) to one ( 1 ) acre at the north- • :east cornea^: . A`:copy.• of the letter and attachments a-e attached to 'this-.. .report . B . . PLANNING. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :. • 1 . We have reviewed `the .applicant ' s request for' amendment to the original application . Although this amendment reduces the potential, conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan , . we, still .. do ;.riot feel that there is adequate justi - fication.-for the applicant ' s proposed rezoning to. B- 1 . 2 . The . proposed reduction in the B-1 zoned area will be more in line with the Comprehensive Plan ; however , the : • proposal still reduces the non-commercial frontage on Sunset Boulevard by appr..oximately one-third . Based upon the specific Comprehensive Plan - analysis done for the Ernst/Pay. ° n ' Save Shopping Cen.ter just to the east of this site , it appears that the multiple .family separa- tion along Sunset 'Boulevard should be retained to achieve the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to not create a con- tinuous commercial strip . 3. Pr/icu. Comur•ehensive Plan amendment for the vicinity of Sunset and Duvall indicated approximately_twent,y ( 20 ) acres of com rci .1�L_e 9 area . npro.xjrmately .iO%of this area remains vacant. ' The applicant ' s proposal to extend the commerce la area does not appear to be con- sistent With the existing conditions , and no justifica- tion has been presented to substantiate the need for additional commercial zoning . . 4 . Should commercial zoning 'be extended west of Anacortes , the remainder of .'the.. property should be zoned R-3 and a significant landscape buffer be provided ( 25 ' to 50 ' ) separating the .commercial' and ' residential uses . 5 . We have reviewed the specific site development plans pro- posed for the intended use of the property - a McDonalds • Fast Food • Restaurant . The plans do not adequately address minimum requirements for separation of the commercial use from future residential use . RECOMMENDATION : ' ' . Based upon the previous 'analysis contained in our report of •Janu- ary 23 , 1979 , if the Hearing Examiner proposes to rezone the • .property , our recommendation: wouldrbe 'to R-3 , Medium Density Mul - tiple Family. As indicated in' the- foregoing analysis , the appl i - • cant does not , in our view, adequately justify the proposed extension of commercial property outside bf the twenty (20 ) acre • area designated on the Comprehensive Plan . If commercial zoning is allowed west of Anacortes Court, a minimum 25 ' - 50 ' landscape • • separation should be required between the commercial and residential uses . I. ,:'....,. RECEIVED . CITY OF RENTON • HEARING EXAMINER . PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEB 2 71979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Avy n qp 1+y q ¢y '3 ,q o �1 O I�IA�1E7dB1Ll g lrfa)1�51. I PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 23 , 1979 � — _, APPLICANT: ..' ANTON & MILLIE E . ALTHOFF - FILE NUFMBER : .. R-272-79 ITEM NO. / A. SUMMARY OF . REQUEST: •; `...,,...::::,_ The., applicant : seeks, ... pprova1. .of. a rezone from "G" to B-1 to permi t •<future commercial 'use of the subject site. :.. ''. .. : B. .' GENERAL INFORMATION : ' 1 . . Own'erof Record :, ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF ; . 2 . Applicant: ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF . 3 . Location . , • On the south west corner of _ ` Sunset Blvd . N . E . and Anacort Avenue N. E . 4 Legal Description: . . , . . . A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : . 3.82 acres 6 . Access : . .. Via Sunset Blvd . N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning : "G" , General Classification District 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : "G" , General Classification District ; B-1 , Business. Use ; R-2 , Residential Two Family ; R-3 , Residential .Multiple Family. 9 . Comi.;rehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multiple Famil 10. Notification : . The applicant was. notified in writing of the hearing date . • Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and • posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To provide the zoning consistent with development of a fast food restaurant and an additional commercial use to be developed later . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into . the City by Ordinance #2408 dated May 27 , 1968, at which time the existing G zoning ',Was applied . The site was within a general area which was the subject, of a , Comprehensive Plan amendment on March 9 , 1977 by Ordinance #3112 . The property adjacent to the easterly boundary was rezoned from "G" to B-1 and R-2 by Ordinance 0152 dated August 15 , 1,977 . h .• 5+'r. -: •- -PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING File No : FI-`L72� 79NG EXAMINER ! ' PUBLIC HEARING:.U ANTON & MILL IE,. JANUARY 23s; 1979 . . PAGE NO . E. C PHYSIAL BACK OUND: with only slope rising east-west 1 . Topography: Re1at.ively level ' at southwest. corner of property .. sandy loam (ABC ) . Perr„� abe i t.Y and subsoil . ity 2 . Soils:moderately A o.ap g,i nethThi s ra i�d in the surface layer i s sl owme p moderate . and isRunoff slow to medium and the erosion �owacrops �modera e - • pasture ,p slopingrap soil is used forn timber , is amtion , slo i9 Urban development . Ragnar-Indianola association , urPermeability torn Slopes are 2-15%. e andh urban . rapid ; runoff is slow to medium and the erosionhazard is slight to moderate , This soil is used for development• grass black- berries The subject site includestand rab Douglas andir and 3o Vegetation : together with a significant . • other evergreens , rovide suitable 4 . Wildlife:. Existing vegetation on the site may P " . habitat , 'nore birds and small mammals . the middle portion of the A small stream flows through This stream ultimately 5 . Wropeer e system. in an east-west direction . ' drainage property creek/May becomes part' of .the Honey dwellings - `si.te :consists of two family r ' Land Use: : The and undevelopedsingle land in the remainder . � ` in the northwest portior, F . NEIGHBORH00D CHARAC�.I5T_ CS :• Commercial uses The area consists of a variety of land uses . intersection of Sunset and Duval the subjectMulti -f oriented locate theo alongc single family residences interspersed . uses are located ' to the north, south and southwest growth • site with low density on Sunset Blvd . The area can be considered redence to aighr intensity along single family uses , princi area due toare arterials . due the' influence of theeiasJorarterials . p uses , ngincittllyresidential a ed Existing platted single family generally south and west of the subject site . G . PUBLIC SERVICES : • Sunset A 12" water main exists along 1 • ldlvd .ater and Sewer : 12" sewer main and a 12" . storm Blvd . N . E. together with a • sewer. artment as tection: Provided by the Renton Fire Dep 2�, Fire'. !'ro per Ordinance requirements . Union Metro Transit Route #107 operates clang 3 , Transit : N. E. ' i2th Street within mile to the west . Avenue N. F , and of the subject' site .• Honeydew and Sierra • Ihe' bite is within 1 mwile ofthin 2Uo eYd of McKnightn, . Schools : Schools an d .� � Heights £Lernentary �- mile of Hazen High School ' Junior .High School and within � Kiwanis Park Parks : The subject site is within 1 mile of park west of 5. proposed King and within 1 mile of the Scools • .. Sierra Heights Elementary H. A PPL_IC• ABL£ SEC �IUNS OF THE xONING CUDk : Section 4-729 (C) , General Classification District . 1 • Residence District . 2 • Section -70D (A) .21t_ 39 Residence District . 3 , Section 4' qn . ,,..... , C-9 .'e • , . PLANNING DEPARTMENT 91 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A' PUBLIC HEARING: ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , File No: R-272-79 . JANUARY 23 , 1979. . , .: . :': PAGE THREE • ,. :4 . Section 4-711 , 8-1 , Business District. • :. • 5. ' Chapter 22 , :Parking and: Loading Ordinance. }$.'.4.."' .°?.I:. ' P PLICABLE SECTIONS •OF -T 4 HE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR ''c'el.'� • • OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT .,.. Oie.:,, ' ' 1 Land Use • Report, 1965 g Pages 17-18, Objectives . °"-:• :• '. 2•.. Policy Statement.,.' Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , ,f 1965 , page 5 , #2 , Community . •;.,;-', :El. IMPACT ON THE .NATURAL 'SYSTEMS o �•! 'r^ �•.ir � ; ... '. J impact act upon ;.�-.^. ;::e.. . ' , .; Rezone..;.of; the', subject :sito mill -not have a direct p i ',;>;,,• :�,., .,�.he •natura'1 'systems ::., sHowever;: future development of the site ,,. will disturb soil•;::vegetation 'and: the stream, increase storm '; 1.,,:. ;;Y , water •runof.f•:.and have • an 'effect on traffic and noise levels ; .,,• :• ' . • ;. . i n the areas..•. .Through p' ' oper .. development controls and procedures s:'; �`' . these :impacts:.can . be mitigated , however. ' tt ' SOCIAL IMPACTS: . n.-e ,,.,.:: . . The proposed ' rezon•eng •to commercial will provide for those n - .�, .• ,:.;, " • :;:. interactions 'associated with commercial uses . If the ` e: . Comprehensive Plan designation of medium density multiple family , ,. ..;:_, • is followed , new neighborhood interactions , friendships , and social • . e' ' ' ties will .eventually take place. . , > - 'nL- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : E ,^,'., : Pursuant to the . City: of Renton' s. Environmental Ordinance;' and the of.;'''' '',`•- ' State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , • . a declaration of non-significant impact has been issued for the .. <. ' • rezoning only. This declaration is based upon preservation !4''' . -' of significant' trees and incorporation of the existing creek into future development plans in a manner satisfactory to its natural character. ._._'� ': •� '. Me AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS 'CONTACTED : • 1 . City of • Renton 'BuildingoDivision . r ' 2. City of :Renton Engineering Division .• , • . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. , 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division. • 5 . City of. Renton ' Fire Department. N. , PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ' 1 . The subject proposal is, for 'rezoning from G (Single 'Family) to B-1 (Business ) in an area shown on the land use element '`,•..` ,,' .• of the Comprehensive Plan for Medium Density Multiple Family . 2 . The subject area was reviewed as a part of the 1976 Comprehensive Plan amendments for which the medium density multiple family designation of the subject was retained . The . specific comprehensive plan amendment related to the property to the east now developed as the Central Highlands ( Ernst-Albertson ) . The Land Use Committee of the Planning Commission considered five ( 5) basic land use alternatives for ,, the properties generally between Union Avenue N . E . and Duvall Avenue N . E . . The Committee concluded that without a more comprehensive approach that it would concentrate on Sunset and Duvall , however , the Committee ' s recommendation clearly_ identi ies a Mediln ll nzity Mul ti p e Family separation between those commercial uses generally at Sunset and Duvall and the commerslal _does generally at Sunset and Union , The Committee r nS r� mendation was adopted •b. the Planning Commission and ultimately by ie ity Council . 'n •• . 1, a. � . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER . PUBLIC HEARING: ANTON & MILLIE ALTHOFF , FILE NO : R-272-79 JANUARY 23 , 1979 • PAGE FOUR • 3. The subject property is • a portion of a larger G zoned area which currently provides a separation of B- 1: zoned parcels at Duvall ' and Sunset, from similar B- 1 zoned parcels at Union and Sunset . To the north and south are existing developed R-3 parcels . To the east and southeast are vacant R-2 and SR ( King County) residence areas . To the extreme southeast is Hazen High School . The Comprehensiv ,fin identifies "minor retail centers or neig eorhood shopping • • . • tricis--0l-I—be located near L e perimeters of several • neighborhoocIs a it at the into tction�f ma.jQr. roads lad aWar erieTs ." .(Eiiphasisµaddded ) (Land Use Report , 1965 , Commerci - page 11 . ) ' .:Approval of the subject rezoning would conflict . with this goal in that it would create a • L coritinuoies . strip of commercial activity from west of Union i. Avenue. N. E . .to east of ,Duvall Avenue N . E . Such strip . commercial • development would encourage small scale commercial Uses inviting numerous driveways , high traffic circulations and increased turning movements . This situationwould appear • to directly conflict with the Arterials and Streets Plans Objectives (page 3) : • • "a . Provision for safe , efficient and covenient movement of peoples and goods . " • • "b . Arterial ---patterns-•---complimentary to the general land use plan . " "c . Adequate and safe access--- (for) efficient utilization . " 4 . The Comprehenslve Plan clearly indicates a separation of land uses in this area including buffers between commercial uses and between commercial and single family areas . The subjE • property is identified as being •for Medium Density Multiple Family 'or R-3. zoning . The R-3 District would provide for approximately 110 dwelling units on the subject site . 5 . The land use designation of Medium Density Multiple Family appears to be consistent with policy statements of the Comprehensive •Plan , including " In medium and high density residential use districts---other compatible uses ;may include-- shopping districts and other functions which are not detrimental to the maintenance of .desirable living conditions . " (Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page 11 ) . 6 . It should also be noted that the Comprehensive Plan states that residential uses provide for preservation .of "natural features and amenities-- (which) should be utilized to best advantage for the use and benefit of the community. " (Land Use Report , 1965 , Residential , page ! 1 . ) The site with its centrally located stream and interior stands . bf firs lends • itself to a we . l . designed residential use . Preservation of the stream anc: vegetation is crucial to the. attainment of the highest and best use of the site . 7 . The Fire Department indicates that the proposed use must • i,ieet fire flow hydrant location and access requirements of the Department. 8. The Engineering Division has noted that upon future development that Anacortes Avenue N . E . must be ' improved and dedicated and that storm water retension and clean-up of Honeydew Creek is required . 9 . Other departmental comments are attached for consideration . R4\ CITY OF RENTON .E_ ONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY JAB 4 1980 LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. / DOa EXAMINER 'S ACTION `-6, ----------------------- • APPLICATION FEE $ /3S//)./o r7 A--e APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO . Aa D 4fC CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE /'--�-F d ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name Mrs. Arthur Beale Phone 255-9578 Address 4325 N. E. Sunset Blvd. , Renton, Washington 98055 Agent: Richard L. Kloppenburg, 18000 Pacific Highway South #1117, Seattle, Wa 98188-246-515 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on the N.E. corner of the intersection of Union and Sunset Boulevard between and 4 . Square footage or acreage of property approximately 150,000 square feet 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) That portion of the-southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Wa, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said subdivision; thence north 89-24-22 east along the northerly line thereof 3/2.3/ feet; thence south 1-10-21 east 534.00 feet to the true point of beginning; thence south 1-10-21 east 498. 16 feet, more or less, to the northerly line of pil mdry Stdte Hlyhway u; thence westerly along said northerly line to the easterly line of- the westerly 3Q feet in width of said subdivision; thence north 1-23-12 west parallel with the westerly line of said subdivision to a line which is parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision and which intersects the true point of beginning; thence north 89-24-22 east parallel with the northerly line of said subdivision 340.37 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning; EXCEPT road. 6 .- Existing Zoning G Zoning Requested B-1(front) & R-3 (rear) NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See, .Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Applicant and Agent proposes to zone approximately 3.50 acres from G to B-1 and R-3. The Front 300 feet proposed as B-1 and the rear 100 feet proposed R-3 for use as a professional office center. The proposed B-1 will accommodate retail shops, food service business, savings and loan institutions, and banks. Development of the entire center will occur in 1980. 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. Provide landscaping and install buffer areas 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Development of the entire center will occur in 1980 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 • AFFIDAVIT 77,4 RE N1,,,,\ ' ‘.)(f-N1€) V° �- , being duly a orrr�,� eclaxe--'t '� I am the owner of the property involved in this applicati a andw�t�iat thel foregoing statements and answers herein contained and th' 4nformati4/ herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to 01 mbe'��tgo:f my knowledge and belief . Subscribed and sworn before me this `}p -Clay of ! /`e. ' "c- , 19 75 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing ate )22 /ahkee (Name of tary Public) (Signature of Owne ) ,3/- /v N8 sr ,/3 9 24 oS� (Address) (Address) //// 91/6 (City) (State) 17(-59/ (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 AFFIDAVIT 0�' frE/l�bj; „on\ R /0 \ A4hor' IR being duly sty n7"declarem that I am the owner of the property involved in this application,`'$nd that foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the nf'o5m4ffori herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the--be-it of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 30th day of November , 19 79 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at King County e>72e-get--E (Wi Name of Notary Public) (Signature o Owner) 200 Mill Ave. S. , Renton d (Address) (Address) (City) (State) SAr (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . • Date Received , 19 By : Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON �^^=d ' AI ti ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ti' °,; `., E FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. l� �� ' � Environmental Checklist No. of-,4t. e 4-e) PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: ® Declaration of Significance ®Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the, proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent,AND AGENT: Mrs. Arthur Beale and Richard L. Kloppenburg 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Proponent: Agent: 4325 N. E. Sunset. Blvd. 18000 Pacific Highway South, Suite #1117 Renton, Washington 98055 Seattle, Washington 98188 3. Date Checklist submitted December 1979 4. Agency requiring Checklist Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Sunset Square 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Proponent and Agent proposes to zone approximately 3.50 acres from G to B-i and R-3. The Front 300 feet proposed as B-i and the rear 100 feet proposed R-3 for use as a professional office center. The proposed B-i will accommodate retail shops, food service business, savings and loan institutions, and banks. Development of the entire center will occur in 1980. The site is .va,.nt and vegetation consists of g---ses, scotch broom, 'and a few scattere, rees; a storm drainage channel is along the soutgroster-r° r corner of the property. The topography of the site can be characterized as ' above grade and sloping downwar.c to the south and to the west. The maximum 4 -0 elevation variation over the extent of the site appears to be ten feett. 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal . as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The site is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Union Street and Sunset Boulevard. The property is bounded on the west by Union Street, on the south by Sunset Boulevard and Honey Creek, on the east by a vacant house, and on the north by a single family residence. The total size of the site is approximately 150,000 square feet. (See above) 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : The fall season of 1980 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local--including rezones) : . Renton Building Department 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity ' related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No • • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro= posal ; if none has been, completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Copy of rezone application attached • II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and ,"maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: ° (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X I Yam- MAYBE N • (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO! ' (c) Change in topography o.r ground surface relief X features? yrs- MAYBE WO- (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE IV-Ot (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAC NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or • changes in siltation. deposition or erosion which ! • . may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? MAYBE WUT Explanation: (b) asphalt will cover the soil in the parking area -3- (2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YET MICE.E. (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE P (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES WYBE k Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the .rate and amount of surface water runoff? X V S MAYBE RU— (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES WEE NU— (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? YES— MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NB (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? MMAYBBEE (1 ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE IF�I Explanation: (b) parking area will be asphalted with catch basins and water oil separators (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MAYBE ff (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? X YET MAYBE 0— (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YET MAYBE 6— (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YET MAY B N Explanation: (a) the site presently has long grass and scrub bushes that will be removed • e -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? X . V NO' (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement • of fauna? X VES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X VET WEE NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: As there is only a vacant house on the site now, any change will increase the noise level , however, intended use is well below the required level for this area. (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? MAPS€ A�YES Explanation: The parking lot will be illuminated in the evenings until closing. (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 1vr MAYBE WU— Explanation: B-1 zoning and R-3 zoning is exactly the comprehensive plan. (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBENO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X V MAYBE Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? XI V1 MAYBE rid— Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate ofothe human population of an area? X VTT MAYBE A� Explanation: -5- (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand X for new parking? YES FOIE NU- ' (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YET— FATITE PIS (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X Vt Tariff E WU— (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES- MAYBE TO— M Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE N5 Explanation: (a) The proposal will result in increased traffic as per the normal standard' s of a small neighborhood shopping center. (b) The shopping center will require additional parking, but will be on site as per the code requirements. (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES MAYBE NU— (b) Police protection? X YET— MAYBE Fir (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE N(T (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES M NO Explanation: • (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YET— MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X • the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X YET— MAYBE i) 0 (b) Communications systems? X YES MA BEBE N-6— X i\i\L \ (c) Water? YES MAYBE NO -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X , YES MAYBE NO' (e) Storm water drainage? YES NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ' (17). Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: • (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any—scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive X site open to public view? YES MAYBE NU— Explanation: • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing, recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE 0— Explanation: (20) Archeolo ical/Historical_. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? vrs MAYBE NT-- Explanation: • III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my ',part. Proponent: (signed) Mrs. Arthur Beale (name printed) • AGENT FOR THE PROPONE • 1)(244D ill • Richard L. l6ppenburg City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 ENDING' OF FILE FILE TITLE if, ' , i0 000 _ 6-° �