Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA80-020 I . . BEGINNING OF FILE P . . . FILE TITLE 0 / i / 4111, (z)# 063 0 .101111.11." i:, 4fN / 1 / 14 • i . • . 0 - .• .. -�: Y,,a""'".rf>^�� ,r,?$s'.::.1,,k,k.;ya5^"j =''•i'rL''3`ii,,,,.t:_.,•';,c:e". ,4 y,`f,,,',r,lly ua rz`,. s•,i V i{ �t 4 '141 . c*' j-,il%r g.•., ".."1)i egcG'; 4,1 k 'V•''4 '. •a �,;r . ,. G . .(},af v� ,jk , I a, i ;n T l S ff .ue{F: f L 11 ; i.-;,. • .'^.0.'. - < ,i`,.: M tw ,,;$rt• 3 9A ^M•S,A 4 s W�' 1 3 t.,," + la^" i ; .1,)); •.ih•' , i 1r ,n '4 r. r .r 14. 1 t,�•:,..•;"yF�4,''' 'r y'� e E� k I�k +tr �• , �t '* ,N .'x '3„" i,��i <1 �� p� � t,,,�.• J k ,' $ 'a.e^' . F 4Rcta i'` .ui 4,1+,,, r. 1,. :a"{� 9° alb ,, t ., .,y . ,4 r ��y ' 9' a.�'C die?r -'F ,s '. ``s r,..s n i{^ . , `•i. r fi i M1{ '...7:v:;.,.. ha ,}, y `+ 46°F. :•• ..fir. ! `'`, �"' i '�';,�; F I"• k rF �� $ar' ' " , ,'r is Ci4' -a,:. /it r� 'i �, �q,'4L',t.}.. ,A, �.td,}rr�y7=i, s.ltr. �,+°'1 i `_`"F'�X V 1 E+r .! t `, . r `-I, l '4 F a$;,A 'rt(1k'','`! gy a M ,� wA`J 4 , P�.4'pi 4 `,;'N fA{ .,'� , r • �` ,f t ' ",,. P rrr fir m. it�r#zrt1, H, �:'r,, '� �)1� �'� G�4�"e ��. { j'4<<,�A '� �� v�'i. ¢;�Y is C'�,i,��'r`,� t�it '5,,,,.��°p to�v[.yca` � y��g�k�� l.�'4 �� a 5 ' .1 . . wl., ;ti�'.1^,�'t0,*l••• � ,7.1fi. ;," . '� ,v,V4 �•, R'iae5r k'r'IL,.'i+a� A.`i`.1',�'',0A4 . CT''• fm 44 g' ,) k` kiiZ `j",j` k i ''i' • I..z-i";;y:' ;�t,,i V*i. ^ 2:h x;1�` 'i...' any " "•`{ ti,z,„ 4 ,. .1 .,,{ .',.4. '1 r, g'T:'� i t�'4'.01-- V';t;9' tt-e..Z, . . • .. 'f, .r'F; , g•FAA 4:!,r' 14'yea, '+4:- .Pkb c+ 1.fi;a�A` -�tf{ f ;'.t,-.:',, ' �Y, :,fy p- �M6.y'f t,'"r t:I , 4 > T rlr !;y s s,r,� k; � iA}I iT s j rh4 p A ," "'• el,rs.,'If'r+t!.; ," �4 1.*et:-, c ..4;. C .' _<J+A^ .-. i,i 2G,. �'" Lt 0,, bi � < '1 a,F w Y{t_.� %!'i".�t' i.t• ; ,1 i ,1 , • 54pT''•3»+ n '`f: a. „rr '"" F nrl �4'!�''�'F ^. i,4.r' ,,,,f.:6s In 44 4-,{ .[`r•..i..�,: t ,r.i_i ';;`�u ��r,' fi ` si r r �:, <) ' ""x�r::`ri�.,'',• of :1 `P':. .r ell,� ': � ¢ i� Applicant"Ii LYLE'-PICKLE •(Tom?Barghausen',• Cavness Engineers, 4 3 ' i . a� ;yInc.','i 2( 1':5.,;,Division,;t,Suite; B,z,Auburn, WA 98002 R11.14 ''ifi; at'>1nA ` • Fi 1.q.,No 'x-o2o-80 rk kilt« +M ,;; ,�,,y}} r :;1y4:r;x.. r^4•{., -;`� rd�f,;,rflC'�la';. »'a '�', �• .. 'iu ;� ,, �i•1�� ., >,.-d?;�t, .t,.> r�.N�;aL . `•r�:,, .°:+-. ;.IProject Name LYLE PICKLE ''•,;:,.,;1.;z>:+:q-' ; +,z.� ;.1 x r e; 3 Lincoln Ave. r; '.' .a .rif :»�•�f.:' .;.:I ' :.r•: N.E. between ';'`'- -:��„ii. �°5?;�:.,,..,i'.7; Location West side of h y. W, << ', 1 Property ' .y'r $ 3�"fik:' 'v�.t:ti;:1tA;No a:� .,i ':,;-;C:v.i•§'n.:s6 y'''*7,1ar,F ;Mr'.C'„h.w1..4.e,t_:: ,iyKs`;;% .aa ',°" g;','r:.'c;s,'< ;:., N f. .E. 40th St. and N.E. 44th St'. '• `'i• < %r HEARING EXAMINER: Date'' '4-11-80.. -'1'., 1-'4r `'" ' Recommendation Approval with conditions I.' • Date Response . Req./Rec. Date Received Appeal - Date Received • Council Approval - Date �0 e. • • • Date .`-5 l/ /;��U Ordinance/Resolution # 3 3 • / `� Mylar to County for Recording ' � I Mylar Recording # • Remarks: . • ' . • • • • • , ,: ;;,:, RECEIVED ;;=; • • • CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER y? ' • APR 81980 { ,`.; AM • PM • °;'.. 718i9l[0s11i12,1,213i4i5,6 ~ • - •EXHIBIT NO.r,a ,', . • ITEM NO. e- Q, a 4., (Looking NE from 108th Ave . ) STORAGE GARAGE (Looking East from 108th Ave . LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX APARTMENT COMPLEX (Looking So . from 80th St. ) (Looking NE from 80th St . ) 4 OZO - 'O Form 81 i Affidavit of Publication • • STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. COUNTY OF KING, • C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of tHE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington;that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the annexed, being a Retail ad , was published in said newspaper, and not in a So077/ 7.4A✓a supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the rcggulara -etkeire issue of said paper on the following day or days May 28 , 1980 $17 . 9 9 Ordinance No. 3433 • S.-O&M Z. -' and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to itsAsubscribers during all of said period. • CITY'OF RENTON,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE-NO.3433 6:Pi64/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTO;•:, WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES - /}n� /a WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GEN �T/( -(,� ERAL CLASSIFICATION(G-96001 TO BUSINESS • DISTRICT R-02r- (PtCKLE) and sworn to before me this - WHEREAS under Chapter 7,Title IV (Build- SubscribedUCl Second daY (ing Regulations) of Ordinance No.1628 known as ' the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of • of July 19 $0 ': Renton,"as amended,and the maps and reports - adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned �� as General Classification(G-9600);and ' i U edit- , WHEREAS a proper petition for change of , _7 - ��" zone classification of said property has been filed • Notary Public In for F2C2C,{{��State of Watitington with the Planning Department on or about Febru- + ,ding ® Seattle cry 25, 1980,which petition was duly referred to i the Hearing Examiner for investigation,study and public hearing,and a public hearing having been . held thereon on or about April 8, 1980, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hear- ing Examiner and said zoning request being in . conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended,'and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and oil • .Parties having been heard appearing in support _ thereof or In opposition thereto, NOW -�..:} -s -' _- -:'7-4 J THEREFORE _ _ -- . - _ - - THE CITY COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF - . RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS - _ FOLLOWS: - _ .• - SECTION I:The following described property • - . 'in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business - _ _ District(B-1)as hereinbelow specified;subiect to _ the findings,conclusions and decision doted April • - - - - -• - - 11, 1980; the Planning Director is hereby autho- - - rized and directed to change the maps of the •Zoning Ordinance,as amended,to evidence said _ - •- - - - rezoning,to-wit: - - • _ .- LOTS 5 AND 8 OF BLOCK 2 AND LOTS 1 AND - 2 OF BLOCK 3 OF C. D. HILLMAN'S-LAKE -- - _ -- - WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN,.DIVISION -. .._-._ •- _ - .. _' _ . _ _ - =7,AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, "-" - -- - - _ - _ - r PAGE 18,RECORDS OF KING COUNTY,WASH• _ / -�"� _ _ - - INGTON; TOGETHER WITH VACATED - - /'� _- STREETS KNOWN AS LINCOLN PLACE N.E. - - - - - - - ' - - - - _ AND S.E. B3RD STREET, VACATION ORDI- , - ' -,1 _ - - - __ _ NANCE NO. 2961; LESS THE SOUTH 80 FEET , - _ ---+, OF L072,BLOCK 3. _ - -- - ��„.—)1 _ (Said property being located at West side of = _ _ --- - --- _ _ - -- - - - - __ _ -- Lincoln Avenue N.E.between N.E.40th Street and '' --' - ' N.E.44th Street) - - _ - - - SECTION I1: This Ordinance shall be effec- : --- . - - tive upon its passage,approval and five days otter its publication. - .-___----- ___ - - • PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL,this 19th • day of May,1980. . (s)Delores A.Mead;City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 19th day dl May,1980. - . - (s)Barbara Y.Shinpoch,Mayor Approved as to form: (s)Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney Date of Publication:May 28,1980 11 Renton City Council 5/19/8Q. . Page 5 OLD BUSINESS - Continued - Transportation Committee - Continued Maplewood smaller citizen's committee and the State Department of Transpor- Addition tation presented design for signalization which received approval Signal - Cont. and would be in agreement with Washington State Traffic Control Device Standards under Warrant #2 to provide for access to a busy arterial . The committee report recommended Council concur in the proposed signalization and the matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee for drafting of proper resolution supporting the citizen's request and the department's proposal . MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Water Shop Lease Councilman Stredicke inquired re status of City Water Shop facilities and was advised by Mayor Shinpoch that the landlord's notice to be out 6/1/80 was still in effect, and that the City is attempting to move to the City Shops if lease cannot be extended. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Vice-Chairman Hughes presented committee Committee report recommending second and final readings of the following ordinances which had been on first reading 5/12/80: Ordinance #3431 An ordinance was read appropriating and transferring $1 ,456.47 Senior Center from Excess Revenue to Senior Center Construction Fund for land- Appropriation scaping along Logan Ave. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL 5 AYES.. CARRIED. Ordinance #3432 An ordinance was read annexing certain territory to the City South Renton known as the South Renton Fire Station located on the east side Fire Station of 108th Ave. SE between SE 170th St. and SE 173rd St. MOVED BY Annexation HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN REPORT AND ADOPT ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: TRIMM, REED, ROCKHILL, HUGHES; ONE NO: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #3433 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification from fickle Rezone G-9600 to B-1 for property located on the west side of Lincoln -020-80 Ave. NE between NE 40th St. and NE 44th St. ; known as the Lyle Pickle Rezone. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN REPORT AND ADOPT ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: TRIMM, REED, ROCKHILL, HUGHES: ONE NO: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #3434 Ways and Means Committee report recommended first reading of an Appropriation ordinance appropriating funds in amount of $57,045 from Park Fund Park Fund Excess Revenue to Park Fund expenditure accounts for recreation services and facilities. Following reading of the ordinance, need for adoption was made known and ordinance was advanced to second and final readings. Following readings, it was MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Resolution #2333 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended reading and LID 318 Street adoption of the following resolutions: Improvements A resolution was read declaring intent to construct and install North 30th St. curbs, gutters, sidewalks and underground utilities and illumina- Public Hearing tion system for N. 30th St. from Park Ave. N to FAI-405, setting 7/7/80 public hearing 7/7/80. MOVED BY HUGHES, Resolution #2334 A resolution was read transferring funds in amount of $5,000 for Needs Inventory study of Needs Inventory Data for Traffic Engineering/Control Data Transfer Devices. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN REPORT AND ADOPT RESOLUTION. CARRIED. Resolution#2335. A resolution was read declaring intent to vacate portion of Proposed Street Pelly Place North near Lake Washington Blvd. N. as petitioned by Vacation Lake Terrace Associates and set public hearing 6/23/80. MOVED Pelly P1. N BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN REPORT AND ADOPT RESOLUTION Public Hearing AS READ. CARRIED. 6/23/80 V Renton City Council 5/19/80 Page 6 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS - Continued Resolution #2336 A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and Clerk to e ter King Subregional into an agreement with King Subregional Council/Solid Wast= Manage- Council/Solid ment Board relating to the City's participation in County ide plan Waste Management for- solid waste management. Community Services Committee Ihairman Reed explained committee approval 5/12, City not to participate other than with costs. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT RESOLUTION. CARRIED. Resolution #2337 A resolution was read authorizing formal application to th= Fund Assistance Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation for fund assistance Outdoor Recreation for community park on the southeastern tip of Lake Washington. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT RESOLUTION. CARRIED. Voucher The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval for paym-nt of Approval Vouchers 28455 through No. 28584 in amount of $355,596.03 aving received department certification as to receipt ofmerchan ise and/or services. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECOND ROCKHILL, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. (Vouchers #28450 - 284 4 machine voided.) NEW BUSINESS Councilman Stredicke for the record, quoted from Mayor Shi poch's Use of Vacation letter of 4/28/80 requesting Council action to permit employees Hours to Assist to use accrued vacation in less than currently authorized Flex Time increments. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER TO TH Operation COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE THE SUBJECT OF ALLOWING USE OF LESS THAN FOUR HOUR INCREMENTS OF VACATION TIME. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE Mayor Shinpoch advised meeting with representives of the REPORT Downtown Merchants, Chamber of Commerce and Post Office pe sonnel Post Office to discuss the proposed relocation of the Renton Post Offi e. Relocation She explained that approval to proceed has not been grantee by the National offices and it is not anticipated for six mon hs, so that any discussion prior to that time would be prematu e. Finance Director Mayor Shinpoch. reported Finance Director Gwen Marshall has returned to work on a part-time basis after being hospitalized. Rift Policy Mayor Shinpoch noted City policy in event laying-off of personnel is necessary, which would comply with the Civil Service Rules for uniformed personnel and abide by the 21R contract base. on seniority. The Mayor noted personnel not covered by the policy would be union-exempt management and the Administration wo ld make the decision based on City need. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND REED, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 14 :05 P.M. d . '/ / Delores A. Mead, C.M. . City Clerk • OF R4.1' A. 40 © ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 O914Tel) SEP1°�O�P May 23, 1980 Mr. Toin Barghausen Cavriess Engineers, Inc. 201 South Division, Suite B - Auburn, WA 98002 RE: File No'. •R-020-80;• Lyle Pickle Request for Rezone. bear Mr. Barghausen: • This is to notify you that the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3434 on May 19, 1980 to finalize the referenced application. Sincerely, .%6 •Nam" Fred. J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: P1 nning Department - ity Clerk lc 41, 1iRenton City Council May 12, 1980 Page 3 Old Business - Continued Occupancy of Councilman Stredicke inquired re occupancy of building on Used Building - Used Car Lot/Motel/Sunset. Mayor noted building was vacant, but as Car Lot/Motel/ of late this afternoon had been occupied. Motion by Stredicke, Sunset Second Hughes, if the situation, as described .continues,city license of this operation be lifted if violation is repeated. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, SUBJECT MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE ADMINISTRATION FOR REPORT BACK TO THE COUNCIL. CARRIED. Planning & Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented Development report recommending, after complete investigation, the present Committee system fo.r area wide zoning seems to be working and that there be Area Wide no other action taken concerning this item. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, Zoning SECOND REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Reduction of Councilman Rockhill reminded the administration of the need Force for a Reduction in Force policy. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report recommending the following ordinances for first reading: Appropriation of Ordinance was read appropriating funds in the amount of Funds - Landscaping $1 ,456.47 into the Senior Center Construction Fund to provide Logan Avenue for landscaping along Logan Avenue. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. (Funds from Excess Revenue to Senior Center Annexation-South Ordinance was read annexing property to the City of Renton End Fire Station for the South end fire station. Property located east side of 108th Avenue SE between SE 170th St. and SE 173rd St. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. MOVED BY SIKLUICKE, SECOND SHANE, ARCHITECT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH END FIRE STATION BE REFERRED TO THE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Pickle Rezone Ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of R-020-80 certain properties within the City from General Classification (G-9600) to Business District (B-1 ) . Lyle Pickle, R-020-80. Property located at West side of Lincoln Avenue NE between NE 40th St. and NE 44th St. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. CARRIED. Voucher Ways and Means Committee report recommended approval of Approval vouchers no. 28188 through no. 28449 in the amount of $478,613.08 Machine Voids plus LID #312 Revenue Warrant R-3 $74,788.27. MOVED CLYMER. SECOND 28183 - 28187 TRIMM,TO CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Mayor Shinpoch reported school levy election tomorrow. 2) The State Audit has been completed with only minor recommendations. 3) Boeing Computer Services, as a public service, will be offer- ing advice on our Data Processing Department due to the departure of Data Processing Director. 4) Stoneway Concrete donated and delivered concrete to the new fire station for the base on the flag pole. AUDIENCE COMMENT Taxi Cab Doretha E. Rood, President of OK Cab Inc. , inquired why the Zones number of taxi cab stands was decreased. Mayor Shinpoch noted the council stands by previous action of reduction in taxi cab zones. Charles Johnson, OK Cab, requested council allow parking for cabs when not use (breaks, lunch) in the downtown area and that yellow markings be made more prominent to discourage parking by other automobiles. Mayor Shinpoch noted she would check on the cab stall markings. II/ Renton City Council May 12, 1980 Page 4 Audience Comment - Continued Water Shop Jack Chapman, Renton Water Dept. , noted the inconvenience of moving to the street shop with the large inventory due to the termination of lease agreement for property on Pelly Ave. Mayor Shinpoch noted she is aware of the inconveniec=, but at this time there is no alternative; as the new shops can not be made ready in one month. MOVED BY STREDICKE, S:COND SHANE, REFER THE LEASES TO CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. Municipal Del Mead, City Clerk, thanked the Mayor on behalf of the W.shington Clerk's Week Municipal Clerks' Association for the proclamation of Cler 's Week. Executive MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIV Session SESSION. CARRIED. 9:20 p.m. Council reconvened at 10:00 p.m. Roll Call : All members present. Refund for The Mayor repeated council direction to research and refun. Development double charges inadvertantly made to developers. The Charges refund is to include 7% simple interest. Further, council authorized the administration to meet with Pace Corporati.n to discuss development fees that they are protesting. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. 10:03 p.m. CARRIED. Delores A. Mead, C.M.0 City Clerk y -J` Regular Meeting RENTON CITY COUNCIL May 5 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; CHARLES F. .SHANE, JOHN W. COUNCIL REED, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, RANDALL ROCKHILL, ROBERT HUGHES and EARL CLYMER. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney; IN ATTENDANCE DEL MEAD, City Clerk; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; RAY CALDWELL, Police Department; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF APRIL 28, 1980 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion with follows the business matters included: Proclamation Proclamation of Mayor Shinpoch declared Youth Soccer Days May 9th through May 18, 1980. Council concurred. Funds for Letter from Planning and Finance Department requested appropri- Senior Center ation in amount of $1 ,456.47 of Senior Center investment interest to the Senior Center Construction Fund to provide for budgeted landscaping along Logan Ave. and as necessary. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Rezone R-020-80 Hearing Examiner Kaufman recommendation for approval (subject Lyle Pickle to conditions)of rezone R-020-80 for Lyle Pickle, property located on the west side of Lincoln Ave. NE between NE 40th St. and NE 44th St. ; G-9600 to B-1 for future commercial develop- ment. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Proclamation Mayor Shinpoch proclaimed May 1 , 1980 as beginning of Youth Week. Council concurred. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approved PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS Federal Flood Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason introduced Wes Hazard Insurance Edens of the Federal Emergency Management Agency who explained need for City to adopt an ordinance making purchase of Federal Flood Insurance available to citizens. Peter D. Patterson, Tudor Engineering Co. , explained gathering of flood water information and displayed maps prepared. Discussion ensued regarding 100 year flood; Gonnason noting 1975 flood of Cedar River was regarded as 33 year flood stage. Gonnason explained this program as portion of the Green River Valley Interim Policy and Regulatory Plan as being prepared by King County through the Basin Executive Committee and passage of the ordinance will make flood insurance and funding available for Green River Valley development. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, REFER SUBJECT TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Council Upon Council Member request, Mayor Shinpoch advised information Inquiries would be provided re: occupancy/building permit on Park between Regarding 5th and 6th; also regarding compliance with parking ordinance Parking/Building for building at 2nd and Williams Ave. S. ; also re parking for Traffic, etc. building at 3rd and Wells N. ; and also regarding charges at the Sunset Lift Station; as well as use of flagman and right to placement of traffic signal by private developer ; also re seal- ing off of empty motel buildings to prevent problems;, and use 'of public right-of-way for car sales. Renton City Council 5/5/80 Page 2 OLD BUSINESS - Continued Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed reported me-ting Committee with Recreation Planner for Puget Sound Power and Ligh Co. to Windsor Hills Park discuss Windsor Hills Park which will be built by Puge Power. Reed noted public hearings to determine nature of park. Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman Stredicke presented report Aviation for informational purposes, noting the committee met with fixed Committee base operators at the Renton Airport re proposed impro ements for buildings and parking for Renton Aviation which will house Robertson Aircraft; parking requirements to be revieweg by the Hearing Examiner. Also the report noted direction given to the Airport Director for Renton Aviation lease amendment tle allow parking west of Perimeter Rd. at Northwest Airport entrance. Recess MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE INUTES. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:17 p.m. and reconvene• at 9:22 p.m. All Council Members were present at Roll C-11 . Puget Sound Councilman Hughes, City's representative to Puget Sou d Council Council of of Government, reported concerning the on-going studi =s of Government C.O.G. , State and Metro re transportation, solid wast- manage- ment, water and waste water management; also regarding problem of sludge disposition. Councilman Hughes welcomed City Clerk Mead recently r;turned from LID 302 bond-signing trip to Chicago; and extended co gratulations on her election to Vice-President , Washington Municip. 1 Clerk's Association. Councilman Hughes - noted favorably the new Council Agenda format. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presentee an Committee ordinance for second and final readings that appropr ated Ordinance #3430 $566. 14 from unanticipated revenues for reimbursement of money Appropriation paid from equipment maintenance account. MOVED BY CL MER, Fire Equipment SECOND SHANE, PLACE ORDINANCE ON SECOND AND FINAL REAuINGS. CARRIED. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, .ECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL 'YES. CARRIED. The committee report recommended reading and adoption of the following resolutions : Resolution #2331 A resolution was read establishing wage differentials of 11% Wage Differential between Captain and position of Battalion Chief; 8% between Fire Department Battalion Chief and position of Chief for positions within the Renton Fire Department not covered by Collective :argaining negotiated with Fire Fighter's Local #864; fringe ben-fits were included. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, ADOPT RESO UTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2332 A resolution was read establishing wage differentials for Police, Wage Differential Department positions not covered by the Collective Bargaining Police Department negotiated with Renton Police Officers ' Guild: 13% differential between Sergeant and Lieutenant; 11% differential bet een Lieuten- ant and Captain; 8% between Captain and Chief; fringe benefits apply. Following reading, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND STREDICKE, SUBJECT OF INITIATION OF BO0 Tax A BUSINESS AND OCCUPATION TAX BE REFERRED TO THE COM ITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CARRIED. Committee of Council President Trimm requested delay in 5/8 Committee of the the Whole Whole meeting due to need for additional information regarding Meeting Date capital improvements. Councilman Stredicke announced special meeting of Community Opera Productions 5/15/80 7:30 s .m. at St. Lukes Episcopal Church, Wells Ave. S. , for prese tation Presentation to Charles Delaurenti , former Mayor. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND for Former Mayor SHANE, CHANGE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING DATE FRIM 5/8/80 TO 5/22/80. CARRIED. OF ,y THE CITY OF RENTON 4$ 0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD 0 Barhara Y. Shinpoch CITY CLERK .45 o/7-F0 SEPSo$0 May 23, 1980 Lyle Pickle ' 201 S. Division Suite 3? Auburn, Wa. 93002 RE: Ordinance No. 3433 Rezone 020-80 Dear Mr. Pickle, The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, May 19, 1980 has adopted Ordinance No. 3433. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.N. C. City Clerk DAM:j,eb' db Enclosure 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 'ORDINANCE NO. 3433 AC NL ASSIFICATION ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL (G-9600) TO BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) R-020-80 (PICKLE) WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification (G-9600); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about February, 25, 1980, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about April 8, 1980, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Business District (B-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated April 11, 1980; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning "Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. (Said property being located at West side of Lincoln Avenue • N.E. between N.E. 40th Street and N.E. 44th Street)- . SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication.. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, this 19thday, of May _, 1980. Delores A. Mead, Crty Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 19thiday of May , 1980. LCVtGJ '5WO Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. War n, City Attorpey Date of Publication: May 28, 1980 • .,' • • EXHIBIT "A" PICKLE REZONE • R-020-80 LOTS 5 AND 8 OF BLOCK 2 AND LOTS 1 AND 2 OF BLOCK 3 OF C. D. HILLMAN' S LAKE WASHINGTON GARDEN OF EDEN, DIVISION #7, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 18, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREETS KNOWN AS LINCOLN PLACE' N. E. AND S. E. 83RD STREET, VACATION ORDINANCE NO. 2961; LESS THE SOUTH 80 FEET OF LOT 2, BLOCK 3 . i. Nn SC He + , \ 4 I + t •�4.1 CO , t'' s SE i2 0 ur / t •a r > • X) t • . •,. ! O'''ri' ' .. N I , •' . 0 ?- i fi,.' ,•(-v ' :, ' 7 % i\f .. , ti.,. 4,0* . ' r• . : ; i1 ', r 1' ..4- :es i4i i .I'! !, ®:, , • . / 7 , i. • . ' ., 1/�. `. ' fir^ ' • S- 1• ! I;A 76TH , . ST '1, SE • SE L (I) A. tri . • f vi.: ' � ' ��a~ of SE 7 'iW t - w- � a t 4• 0.• ' •.--in-r .,•••,•• i ' •0.. •••••• ,o' • - • ',1-1 . 4''' ...• ' ." . r ' ' . ,... , S., T • .z: Ef 49Til' ;p:-..: • ' i t SE 8OT1 �,• ,, E�f 230't"`!'! . I'..:. V,'I t•'i 4 i ni.. Ai- • . )... • ir ..,.. - 1 c , '6'.1.: ' i .'.. i !;1,,,,„, . 0...v.-J.....: , •'IN . P`..i t• ., • 1c. • 11 ..•,y x ,., .`I S Ins. i `., t ';. ,y jtYf , . i-#•,.c '•'v.. / . ; ; 4".., ..... ; . 1 r I, ipe,.,,• , ••, • 0. •rr-• \ i li��t t :ri4p• 4�,r �! ,'T11t. +f�•1s•1';',`'a �i'!'•'. '�. • iryas , 4 �•,, .� I Fai 74 ram a `. ''..., �( . 1,1A 1&"I ,.. \); ' 4. •• ; i a 4 0 T H S T % I', • I. • ,t k!M► •41..•1y., �� < ; , •I1''1•t l c ,, 0 / • 1 1 Z 1•5 11• .w • T ,r�'y 11 My'` .. r,•. ,14. • I.A.J 4 1 $ 1. 1 . . L., . 1 { 1 • r 1 „ ! iF`, SF 0 P'i�yrf.ii )/LLA�•1' .�n tl:�.,•t!r Lij Nil" .. . -. ,17.13:tecl i 4 ....,r.,, ; < • . r , I ,.• 1 : . !'11,... ‘ • • - • 4- t' . r4 r.,• ..t-•;1r .i..11,,,4,1 • 4- ". A iii • IYf`,,7f�,441,: '•1. ,..1ra u t f•.', .^ ,:„ , `(..il" •:.•., r I J 14 ' ! ? • 44 •r) � G 14' ,i. • f.: till lle. .. �lc • S� s 1.� ):, 4 (4,41-44'.‘„.. r' 36TH T ;,L,.,< g ;;lyr, ;tiC.p,, ,� i�4.-. '.� :7"""'IPi.".... .••1 •,:.:.. f••r .,.• , ' ,{ '��\ `'�l 8' . i•`N14t+1. rj!Y" c;I j 1.0e. .Y nttr r M K .ram j.-.r, ,.,i,.•...: ` Itws • Z, 1 ') lh !H'. \%11'':41i,•1e " 4•ii1fa :-•k , • CE)( SairtAf6. . • 4/arziliss.0 ‘cga€1. , . . . fir A riCtri'ur • • C' CoOs%,x SP-5;Kgie1-am, i Q 1 P-f�bliC /V3S•••/26lie..LD- 14ttbtsiiy?Viti4:1it p Q t. • �) P/,Q ��1'kS i �I�,c d e y • Fr D Pfled�v*+ IriS; yf)VMkm tr OF R4,, ' Y >: U s® ° THE CITY OF RENTON �/ Z ,e.c< < MUNICIPAL BUI LDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o •BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 0,9 Pco FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9TFD SEPlEo April 28, 1980 Mr. Tom Barghausen Cavness Engineers, Inc. 201 South Division, Suite B Auburn, WA 98002 RE: File No. R-020-80; Lyle Pickle Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Barghausen: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of April 11, 1980, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk r///' • • • • For.u;e By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM • RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING • SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm, Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of . May 5, '1980 • (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name). . Agenda Status: • • SUBJECT: File No. R-020-80; Lyle Pickle Consent X Public Hearing • Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution X • Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach New Business Study Session • A. Examiner's Report, '4-11-80 Other B. • C. Approval : • • • Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X •COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED:.Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X • conditions Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ ' Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background .information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if. necessary.) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced rezone application • was published on April 11, 1980, and an appeal period established to expire on April 25, 1980. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council members following the seven day period from the date of publication, and will be scheduled on the City Council agenda for May 5, 1980 (unless reconsidered or appealed) for referral to Ways and Means Committee for adoption of an ordinance. • • PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: • Seepage 5 of the attached report. • • SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) . County of Icing ) Dolores M. Etzel ,. , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the llth day of April , 19 80 , of f iant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. lAe,/# 2w Subscribed and sworn this (/ day of 19 S'b . ))7. AL_ Not ry ��r•li in and for the State of Wa hi ,ton) residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: LYLE PICKLE; R-020-80 (The minuted contain a £iat ol5 the pantieb o6 necohd) April 11, 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. FILE NO. R-020-80 APPLICANT: Lyle Pickle LOCATION: West side of Lincoln Avenue N. E. between N. E. 40th Street and N. E. 44th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G-9600 to B-1 for future commercial development. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by REPORT: the Examiner on April 2, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 8, 1980 at 10:35 in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner confirmed with Steve Munson, Planning Department, that he is no relation to E. L. Munson, owner of record of the subject site. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department preliminary report. Steve Munson, Planning Department, reviewed the Planning Department report and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 - Application File including staff report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2 - Land use map as submitted by applicant showing subject site and surrounding property. (This map is based on King County Assessor's base map.) Exhibit #3 - Survey as submitted by applicant Exhibit #4 - Contour map as submitted by applicant Exhibit #5 - Letter from Mike Creegan Munson stated that the rezoning will not directly affect the site. He also made reference to the fact that L-2 of the Planning Department report should read "apart- ments" instead of "condominiums." The Examiner asked for testimony from the applicant or his representative. Responding was: Tom Barghausen Cavness Engineers, Inc. 201 South Division, Suite B Auburn, WA 98002 Mr. Barghausen stated that he supported the basic premise of the planning staff recom- mendations but was concerned with Condition 3 under Section M, Departmental Recommenda- tions, which requests reservation of a 50 •foot wide landscaping strip in the form of easement along the southern boundary of the property to include the planting of evergreen trees. He explained that it was his understanding that no building permits were to be issued or improvements to the property be made until approval of the design plans by the Examiner but felt that the wording of M-3 indicated the planting of evergreen trees to be a condition necessary to rezoning. • R-020-80 Pag Two Barghausen pointed out what he felt to be errors or misinterpretation regardi g the topography as described in D-1 and L-3 of Planning Department report. He sta ed that when I-405 was constructed the plateau area was used as a borrow pit and that exhibit 4, consisting of a field topography prepared by his firm, indicates that the pla eau has been substantially removed and that the steeper places are in confined areas, that there is now a draw through the center of the site and a very flat plateau-like are- on the north 50-60% of the site. This will. easier facilitate a comprehensive gradin• plan for development of the site, he contends. Mr. Barghausen said it was his understanding that to get rezone approval, the applicant would be required to prove there ,is substantial evidence that was not• specifi ally considered at the last land use analysis and that authorized public improveme is or permitted private developments affecting the property have undergone change - d that the property has potential for rezoning in conformance with the Comprehensive 'Ian. Mr. Barghausen contends that in 1965 utilities were not present and I-405 was lot present and that rezoning is now compatible with the present proposals for la • use to the west and north of the site. Mr. Barghausen pointed out that access is important to a commercial site and at the property in question has direct access to on-off ramps for I-405 and that he els 90% of the traffic would be accessing directly to the freeway. He urged the E aminer to consider these changes to the area since the 1964 annexation. The Examiner stated that he has some concern regarding access to the site itse f noting he is aware of an 1-405 exit ramp north of the site, but that the road outside the site seemed substandard. He asked for comment on that. Mr. Barghausen stated that he expects any intense development of the site unde a B-1 classification would involve improvements to the unusual configuration of Linc•ln Avenue to the east in the form of re-alignment of the road or widening of the -treet. He said he is sure these things would be taken into consideration at the time .f site plan review. The Examiner asked for further testimony in support or opposition. to the appli ation. Responding was: Charles Reynolds 8425 - 105th Avenue S. E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Reynolds stated that his property is immediately south of the proposed sit- and out of the City limits. He understands that the City might recommend an annexatio and subsequently rezone property immediately adjacent to it to multi-family 'zoning. Mr. Clemens, Planning Department, replied that the Comprehensive Plan indicate- three uses in the May Creek drainage area. The applicant's proposal .is for the red =rea on Exhibit Map No. 2 to be zoned B-1. He stated that the Comprehensive Plan then shows a buffer or ' transition to multiple family and then finally single family beyond that. He said thatoif the applicant's site is developed under B-1, it is possible th=t some areas to its south and east could eventually be rezoned and developed into multi- family areas. The Examiner asked if Mr. Reynolds' house is the one on top of the hill immedi=tely adjacent to the property. Mr. Reynolds affirmed that it was. Asking the Examiner for permission to respond with neutral comments was: Marilyn Ayres 3429 Lincoln Drive N. E. • Renton, WA 98055 Ms. Ayres stated that her property lies approximately six blocks to the `south .f the subject site. She quoted the Justification for Rezoning Application submitted to the. City of Renton, point No. 2, Existing Land Use, as stating that there has been no new residential construction in the area in the past several years. Then referrin• to the map on the back of that page, she indicated that along 110th Pl. S. E., which i- in the county, there has been one new home built south of 36th and a short plat, whic is in the City limits, consisting of four new homes directly south on the curve of 110th P1. S.E. which becomes 114th. She stated there is also another home on Lincoln Avenue -pproximately two blocks sorth of the subject site. R-020-80 Page Three Ms. Ayres said she wants the City to be aware of the necessity for increased fire pro- tection with the increase of land use. She stated she has no opposition to the rezoning of the subject site. The Examiner asked for further testimony from the applicant or his representative. Mr. Munson wanted to clarify the statement in the Applicant's Justification for Rezoning regarding no new single family residences. He said the statement was in reference to the immediate area for which rezoning to B-1 is requested and that in that area along the freeway near the interchange there has been no residential construction. In reference to the buffering on the south side of the property, Mr. Barghausen pointed out that there is already a 60 foot (possibly 80 foot) right of way along the south side. He believes this was done in trade by Mr. Munson(owner) for the straightening of the configuration of Lincoln Avenue. He continued to say that an additional buffer requirement of 50 feet would create a minimum of 110 feet of separation of structures from the proposed development. to the south side. The Examiner asked Mr. Barghausen if he objected to the additional 50 feet of buffering. Mr. Barghausen replied that he did not. The Examiner asked for further testimony or for comments from the Planning Department. Mr. Munson of the Planning Department wished to clarify that the additional planting referred to in M-3 of the report is intended to mean the planting be done at the time of development. There being no further testimony in support or opposition of the application, the Examiner stated that his decision would be issued in 21 days if there was no objection to that waiting period. There was none. The hearing regarding File No. R-020-80 was closed by the Examiner at 10:50 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of +5.4 acres of property from G-9600 (General; Single Family Residential; minimum lot size - 9,600 sq. ft.) to B-1 (Business/Commercial) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-711 (B-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The subject property is located on the west side of Lincoln Avenue N. E. between N.E. 40th and N.E. 44th Streets. The topography of the site is complex. The sur- face of the site was disturbed by the construction of I-405 when material was removed from the site. There is a knoll on the north end of the site and a draw running through the center of the site. The south side of the site is generally higher than the north end of the site. 9. The site is undeveloped and is densely covered with undergrowth consisting of blackberries and brambles and there are scattered Douglas fir and alder on the site. R-020-80 Page Four 10. The site was annexed into the city in 1964 and the current zone classification, G-9600, was applied at that time. 11. The applicant proposes reclassifying the subject from its present designat'on of G-9600 to B-1 in order to develop commercial uses on the site. 12. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is lo•ated as suitable for commercial uses. The Comprehensive Plan also designates the .rea in the vicinity of the south end of the subject site for low density multifa ly housing to serve as a buffer between commercial and single family use in the area. 13. The area north of the subject site is currently undergoing considerable development. Northeast of the site a large apartment complex is being developed in what is King County. Grading and filling is being pursued north of the subject site. A relatively new warehousing complex is northwest of the subject site. Sou i and east of the subject site are predominantly large scattered site single family u• es. There is also some new single family development occuring to the south. 14. The zoning in the area consists of residential and commercial districts cl•:ssified G-9600 and RS-9600 (King County equivalent of G-9600) and B-1. The commer ial zoning is concentrated along I-405 to the north and west of the subject si e. The residential zoning is located south and east of the subject site. 15. There are single family uses adjacent to the site both directly south of t e subject site and across from the site to the east. The Planning Department has re ommended that the single family use to the south be buffered by a 50 foot easement •f natural vegetation and that the actual site development plans be subject to review by the Examiner prior to the clearing and grading of the site. The applicant had no objection .to these requirements. 16. Lincoln Avenue N.E. in the vicinity of the subject property is not develop-d to the standards necessary to provide. access to a commercial use on the subject s'te and adequate access is a necessary incident to development. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the publi interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare, in addition to ompliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010 which pro ides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area wide rezo e or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification •er the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in the circumstances i the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning action. The applicant has demonstrated that the necessary criteria have been met .o permit the reclassification of the subject property. 2. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the area in which the subject property is located is suitable for the development of commercial uses which the prop.sed reclassification to B-1 would permit. While the Comprehensive Plan also .ppears to designate the area in the vicinity of the south end of the subject site f.r low density multifamily as a buffer for the southerly single family uses, the proposed 50 foot greenbelt buffer will serve that purpose equally well if not bett:r. 3. The zoning north of the subject site is also B-1 and therefore the reclassification would be compatible with this adjacent zoning. As indicated above, the •reenbelt buffer on the south side of the subject site will effectively screen thos- areas to the south which are zoned G-9600 and are currently developed with single amily uses and,therefore, the B-1 zoning will be compatible with the G-9600 zone to he south. 4. The applicant has also demonstrated that the area is indeed undergoing a changed and increased pattern of development. There is. grading and filling occurin• to the north and the development of a large apartment complex to the northeast. I-405 and utilities have been constructed since the area was annexed in 1964. commercial uses in the form of warehouses and garages have been developed just north of the subject site. • . R-020- Page Five 5. In order to facilitate the development of the subject site with its complex topography and surrounding single family uses in a manner which will not prove harmful to the public health, safety and welfare, the final design plans should be subject to review by the Hearing Examiner at a public hearing. In order to further protect and enhance the public welfare, no grading or clearing of the subject site should occur prior to the approval of the design plans by the Examiner. 6. The applicant should remain aware that Lincoln Avenue N.E. in the vicinity of the site is currently not developed to city standards for right of ways serving commer- cial uses, and development of the site would depend on adequate access. RECOMMENDATIONS: The City Council should approve the proposed reclassification of the subject site from G-9600 to B-1 subject to the following: 1. The creation of a 50 foot greenbelt easement along the south property line; 2. No grading or clearing of the subject site prior to approval of the final design plans by the Hearing Examiner; and 3. Approval of the final design plans by the Hearing Examiner after recommendation of the Planning Department and a public hearing on the matter. ORDERED THIS llth day of April, 1980 Fred J. Ka an Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS llth day of April, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Tom Barghausen, Cavness Engineers, Inc. , 201 South Division, Suite B, Auburn, WA 98002 Charles Reynolds, 8425 - 105th Avenue S.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Marilyn Ayres, 3429 Lincoln Drive N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS llth day of April, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 25, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. • 1/1/4901 . . 7.061 ca;gia , ivii7,7.2*- ...."- . 440.a8 4.A204,815141pd ..eici zvglitrin of Apski.,(j ic. ivy NV -Qin .... . v ‘.1" 21 cd!tin splALisv"*Pi c7-7.7f6f..irv.V/7.17 nd..dmj j v %I 1 GI hi!tota114a1bW!5..d5 I10.43A0M144Q", ,,,, . -aaAntit),1.1171/ ...0 . . ,, ...,,..„,„;„ 'r . 'llyf • 9 AV 1 1 IC )C 3 . . . -' ' x - 1721.K.,;H7477k--"Mi. A-- 'FIT ' .k.,14.4: l','•i'''l& ‘71) \i G • ,:,..$41,,,,,,c,1.1$41 ...‘...V.10, I iv r•1.,+ ,V..b,1,.',.,V-,;,-.14:,',).7s:'. its.,''(!) ?‘?.Z2..7.; i• .1.1 ,... ," i 'it lit' 1••'''••Oi*44110 . 1•',1''. .),,,,ieFt,i,,:.,,,c,)4, ../ 4 k • ,la 4: ;0.y.;:pn„,;,,..,4',4Ntli. •. k \.P%-;•• v.• 7i• 4 141:i•ii•7.'t. '' •t ., k ,,, ' i...r.t.•;••`,! • P ' • . '..,),, 'N.6*r p.4,114A• -•411" •*•(,:d,aetk•t-et,',,,,er..:,, ,' e. •., ..: kle js.:4:..., • I I ',.* ,j.•,rt,'S4t.i4414*t., ,., . • lit.i'73, vt.T 1 .74:,••%, y• :•::•.. ' ;:i..: "' ), .140 r• 4, .4,4, ‘.,. . , ;:if.•47,y46,..,_.? ti,,,y. . ;,.., 4, . ..., r 44k„r•ik.'5,1•,/,'S,•, , 1. 1 ••," ' VI.1 V ii“•• •); •Li..."...•',:t.i ii,..%. I 1 .1"' ••elt,'ILd'"' •,,'''0.1.-• ,P, _ip. 2.4.,.. ..' tr.:7'1'44:,',104..C.,' ''' 4.1*,,t' ''''•Aeq.. 1 H19£ . 'ef;A .r.,,,e : ..1 ,,,, „ - I .... r I. -. , • • , ,.'•;,''t''Q'',„a .• :Or' fi'1 •V. .... 110 "Kl. i :., •,4 , ,..„,4 ,.,,,:..„J.\ •r". 5 'Oul ‘,;- :,:t•..`".. )t'1 ..'• 4' % ,,'.7"4" li:, ...... 'r ,".i. .4k .2!• ',.4,; . "F .: ':4 ' .i.,,.. • . ,, . . t • ik,1,•;t„...:4".,.,...A...-ale,,,. • , . . . . ..S -R. VCRi?''''Al(cV 4 4:* •• '''''', rn •1 v . 3 ti 1,.".1. • .'4... ' •nts,k,,,,...,?„!: 144,:ilt,,, ..‘'lig • 'I, ,11% ••• t. la +I NI• .•4'4,61tI1,. Nk , .-. , r.II...•.. tq.04ged44.,,,,,I1 1 Oki'(ti,•'; .,, ,',• 1 _ -,''4'1 it'. et,„,rp e,..• 1ft. t fit; 1 12.7i .: - • rx,i1,41,i1,-;:x.,.. f,.., ..vittii4.. ,' ..f. l's.. fott ..'1,44,,,*. , . .A• ' •i ..... , ;:;,,,4,41 ' ''t ...'::lb." 1 . „ .,.1 '; . • •d II" •'''''Pi 1 .1 !..„16,. if•;., 11' ,It N A4.4''t Ovis% •iff. , „.• 4444%/ t ••• .:' ,,1144•;tifri'f, • ).41.3','''. •:'.A ,,, . liii riw.trove...0,, ,,,„,,•,„ 3 A• , it i.,4••••- ,••t f, 1.4 '' ',,':.. 4Z(..'.•,60,rii.i, .,44 j,: • .4.,','; '4 i' ''' i:*•:,*1'.'41' i ''.' t.i. :' . Ov % f•;•°;*.:t%"!, .' .1 ¢ .*/; 'T ,,.,. :) ,44-4•S j ' 1, •ie -', irOti; ,,,p;%1 j; i 4. y'•'. x Ilict ,, ''•'''''+!:4",4 ; tit: 7..* i 1 .1 .. . ., 4 'I. '• ''':I ....,F:•- 1. l' * q : ',''.. • k. , ch ',..1kt,*-..1 itmak., .,‘ 4. .,, ..-- *fp,44..;:;.i''),',..i.'tt',:i , +. < 11.. • I • ,,,,A r,, , ..,,, ,s, , ,. ,• 0 , .. . ,,,. a :. , . rn ,I. zz, 1,6, I is ,4- • ' .4 .• . 'Al& .1' J •,, • •', ,' : ,e• (',' ...`4$ A lip:'4',. 1 • ,N• s_ .1 ., • , 1 , • - • • • - . ki'i,„1. \ . ... ,...„.. 1... , .., , , 0,•, .... . , :1' '-,.tIt •- , :. { l'Itt ..14' ,m... ....:.) :. : 2 . .' '' '4,1;)':C.......,'' iV' •' ;41 4k• 1 i • I„, „ '',, ' „ ,. •• ... •..! ',. ,•,' ,.'i,d.",.;'. Os.I' . •••• ' `', 4:-- -, ;I: '.• i • .".4 , ;,,' 4;1' ' • .C*141) rikr 4 j 4. ,* 41 ,,1:1/,..A..! i'''. . 1., I.S111 11 ‘ .- ,,.-r ., 4., '.4. 4 • ,,4 4,1 . • r t .. . .•,' - ;Ye' ••' ti'll:,4;t'41',.f! ili,,.. . 'i, '•ietit 'm IN.et't I.in .' fr ', ••,;•: ,,;,, . ..,:,• ,.„,:., .;•.• 1 i ,', • i.,..41,f.11 I.YII• :• ./ii • • 1/40 1 ',1:, .ki,.,: ‘ " • •I , A„ . , 0,11 •:.0 0 ';',,.‘. &CI,:I 0:1".„: ,Ti.4; , ', , ,„, ,,N,,,,. ,,, , 1 N--.,V1 1 , i .k IS 1 •' • . • 1...0 g • k , t',. .1iLl.14..1i.14.41 ok,,,, i Mr. . IL.1.4:' t . ,,•••i.„,..•I . •,• . Illib •••• ''''.41,1" .40' '115i .:1•W.11:::!:., `9". #' -, X • ••,' 4 41.47:•\1, • i 1. ''''.•. I. • .4.'4..' y ,t•••..:14409-, v,t,e t .• 1 1 A-r,,A . : - • 0 64.4,.....w. I ••.„,,,.-• ' 1 .0.,.. vi ; • 4 ....4-..'s-1 1 •I I, . .. el.. y..•i.r , j.011,1. • ‘, l. '14'''..i.4.1...I.,"i.I'f'r?PI. `4.1tri:. -1'.• , 0:4 •e•• ; : Is. , f v). :..,Y;•..,k.•,,,,,,,„k„st.: 0 . ''.;,..? •-.) :tis • t:', ''10-S.. ' v`,: I s'..k.'• r i ' * •,i•••.,:,.i.;14V4'0,,r, 1"1"?.i ";‘,41,Y,,,,*A.,'Pr . '4', ,,44.41:-f,;•;".' '' t',1.0..: 11 t 'r • . .1/ a. •••••••"" 1V. 'I '114E, v;-J.; )41...K4,01.. ••:;, , ,i .:.14, ... ii 1-6,,,,,, ,. i : ' . , , 'k''''''''•' j''',..a.•:11:- 4- 4.,--,, r 4 ,,, ( ,,„ ..,,,,•ti ..„. .., ,.....,....,........-- • , 1 "t• 1...,:e• ..._,,-0,.. ..,,-):.#, af .4:. / 794:U3,1 1 ., .... ' .•,.'4? ' ' • '••t. 9)•}` '{ !'''' ; 4‘. V. ,i t , • - r ,k.it.. !..4.•.•1. . tt •,,, 04.r-;4.3.1;t: 6,t, . . ' I 1.%/'2 i ( , '''' ' j ..,,I.'1 ' Y • 1' .; , ‘;•;.P. k.•11.t.";- E.4 -,.. '..z Si .1 • " i : vspd,, '',,O., iiit,t -1-5,..,1 li i •i ," • • ,.. 1-1....,'" . • i'• 11 1 ft I ?' "..'- ; ik, ) ,.p., ..t '.:, . i i '' •,,,, 14,k.i t.t. ... :., .; •,.' 4 ,,,,, , , .,. r.t.,0,, ...../A., • " i 10001/11W "•,.' ''.' .,,It '''''' '"" " t j 4. . ' ' ig E 108 3S ,,i''' '.•, f i,.. • .k,,, .,:,'" 1 .' 1 1ft •, ' 91, '''fr'•' i # t • 4,0- ' •• : ,,,...I•';. '''4 i, ..ev• t. 94:4 at .•4 l - '4 .1\ :44;.i _,‘,„,,. e, -\., ,,.,, .i,,,, ,,• ... .,. 4,.,.... • .,..v... . A ., *,',.`,•r,et *T(4.,' • '.', '',.4'':P14.,3•.•6o•r.40..4.0± tI•Sd * fipp.• - •S-t "''' ,it• ''' .. .0,1L,1841‘4%„,.1'.‘• :. '. •'. 3N ,rf ,t • ,41 ./.?..*Z.ti„vs..., • ' # •W'••• '.3 r;ir..,V ',:,, ' .,'• .N •r..,: ".1' ' A .."•Pl'. .... ,4 a ta i i ,,,, fl r . . ..1 i , , i., • ire.c.:4:4•4."- : , • tr'4, rizvit, I t i-; .1. 0.' • • 1 or-awl 1 i ,, ,• •, IM rn i;.:4•1 ; i.Ft !L 3S % i, ,,•,•).'4 ,. • ), i • 1 ' .•;.:1 t.• ••. t ..•.13; ...., lji 1,,,-;.•: ..Ir 4.4. ,i'il It' i' , •, •I'• 1'6; '1 •' i •IP: ,... r i .-• < ,i t ...., , lb -. cr) ...1 'I' , ii 3S a ,,,, .)b .,, , , fin i .., , . )r .1. 7 ri : i -- • ;,;,. .. ra i 4 , 4 . • •/k4:41.. 'n'. ' '• '. I . *.; . • ' ;•. , • •4.:1ren,,::;•tral•• ., ' 1 '„ ,,A ., / i /. 4 .;. '' IS'!'•''' ''''' HI9L 04 3 S i , ,,, , . ) : ) .. .., i ', .1 ' ); ",... 1 iv,: :%"'`. • ••• I V,.: • .. 1 1:4, /.. t iv it,.,-,i,:,•,, .1t, , •;i:...ti'::' . , 0 . .-' Ji 1 ,1" '' i, .. •. •''` •:,..3• •, Ic•'.1••' • '' . !? I•I, 4 - • l• • . , . . Kitnr• t i;•PI i 164 •?, •; f :: 14 . / 1 ,,, .. • , , • %. •I • . #t) 7 ',, I.';...;6::: ! .cf., •:',. ' t 't.rk t- egl I A.".. . ' ' -An) .49 (1S i L 14,t4 Hl'irt 3S) • .• . •. , . i • al•• 1 AY / r e• •:'`.. •, ' •A / , , f • - , i Co, i i i . ritt: 4.. / •j ''•• .4• • ' , 0,- ,, ..., 4 e r '•, •••,-..r.• . 1 $ i I .4.a ...1....- ,. .1 ,, . .Atk p•• c4. .54,(,v4 ,v,t Va ei ;:tegitoo., 4. r y f .„; !, , .4... . '. 14, •" 0, . \ • ' -0- '', •'' . r$:''°' „0. : , kil Rs. r? „,,' se .1 t ,, , c 4,14,,:::•.• :74 : r ..ilk . 6,. e d • • 0 i r' ,. . . *••• - n...k.•,,.r .,..',P • ,. . ' ' ' 'F'' '''.11• .t.'%, • r`4. i , P.' '•,..4 „t7- ,,. f igf t3 It.. -1• ;• 4S`NS„,'. ' f ' /44 .... t..u,,,v4, i •.‘ .. : 1 f . • ' i 1 I • "4C • - .e. 121 • tAli' 0 f, ' : 1 re ' '',..., .1 . '•nk• , .•• - + o, ,....,, t to .;. . i ,CD i 1 Vt.'' 4 . i•fr .40. ) 4 ;• 4 pr 49% i ' i \1 .,... 'r • , • ,01 .'. ''• ."l 1...3u?(„r.a•n„g /"..-,,,A.1,1...01 lat..0 , .,.:.‘'4,',•-.• ,i rp, ••,•,„ .,,IrdNM„.',0 i' ••1 • ONl 3S . . 0 k " . i1 ,: / •.0.•.•, ,14• .110061t. ;,A111'A40, 1 • ... \ 11 t %..,... .. . , • 0 , • . .:-•MOS '.•. 't J e,...'...*••.",% • • ,. • ' i t X • • 1. • ' • •" ':i • i .. :t 17'. f rn• 'e• .......IN .• . 4 ••• • EXHIBIT 11-J A -- r- "IF 7 eo z ITEM Nit. ,t' o a u_to --, Tv : /Iee_ , . 7 4.1i$444.0.r..e. •: 0M•.get < G`I�jCo�•.e.*! or 124••• 4ftft . Fikom : /Wike C,r-eelen a�° NNb,a 31 Sin rite r s A V C SP '(. 7 .. gad Rcrt to h bt�n. q' 8 0 �� -�� oa�� . c, y '10HQ\ .7 toe dee tv reevent 01rsri-daion of View f‘e re-or r e to es To rite cots eF So6J cc7' sire, S' r-avvrST Thar rite rekeseir heikr LirntT aF G ' coo zone be retoinc4 as Is . j r Is cltom 'cd r re? v es r4or r/ e /Le / Itr es ro6lislEe4 , eserVe 7lt.oSe dieN/S p. se* rp, t1Ja+/c'd iv ri es e s i Je43 20Aida� �, Renton Planning Department 12411e0 DEVE,:_. 'MENT APPLICATION REVIEW , JET Application : RE2O /E 'R.bo it) P.. 1 4 04~1 flar Nelti' ya r t?ortmor ;" -4 4 ,s 4.e4rt s'' '., •cr -> :1 a aV • Location : Lieoit ve WEA4e � N6901!1 , • A' Appl i cant : : fi•etAieitvelep-ri f- 4 TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:. 9/8/ael Police Department A, R. C, MEETING , l 27f 60 • - Public Works Department RECEIVED CITY OF NENTON Engineering Division . HEARING EXAMINER OF Traffic Engineering APR 91980 p 1 � � ` �M + v� REChIED 'h Bui1 ping Division i8r9tI01111120.1213444 i46 r— MAR �? 1980 1 ` tilities Engineering. 11/1 /,/ Fire Department ti'C.6\\; LNG DEpt CNPi mis .QP, SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS A PL AT J g PROVID D 111 F F THE APLICATION REVIW CONFEEPA9UJI8 EL HELD ON 2.'� AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE RU 1, I TOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO ATT NJ�UJDTHE ARC PEAS PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY PM ON 3 26 eb , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved 4/ Approved with conditions Not Approved Fv9r/ig GbAJShP-oc7ieZ w.Lc. gilkeiee Ct.v/Ci4t nA6 C'ot decciteCfPIA•74 f'o/c 7ccu,'wc y riff /St "lir /4c45 7 .4&-r h,e4- Ft", ei4bit me sletA S , nape /4"42 /V 'Ma&e ace F4 Arlo-MACfS SdAc c- A16- pv7i5c Sc f o /!7� /Q/,,4,A,Zbn ge¢6c/ee° 8y r!� C/.�/� Phi( IMPermirs , ,t,,, / S .4f4t:c_ gC s-ive44D IWO N!ftrAS £Iiew4-Aaa P4WeaS T *// 2`�Gi :Zelel,i/C ,i4ti f&e/'lt -r^ toie CwS 1i�C1//IV Co 4K trefi p G✓1T1 rgie it-!/f/(d�/'!e, - II • dMir ' g Zz_Li G Signature of Director or Authori ed Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved I Approved with conditions Not Approved 1 ' 5A6JELr TO. wiit64.w,atK ►Mc-i - /47[Div 10 j)O " Ail& 56-• • ,01 /5ai .ft ' ✓�rCn- ' I _OI /50. Pr cc 4- A004006\40 Wilwrl Pcr C1 \ � /b) V , leA At) Signatu a of Director or Authorized Representative Date PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 8, 1980 APPLICANT : LYLE PICKLE FILE NUMBER : R-020-80 A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: 'The applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from G-9600 to B-1 for future commercial development . B . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : E .L . MUNSON 2 . Applicant : E . L . MUNSON Location : ( Vicinity Map Attached) West side of Lincoln Avenue N .E . between N .E . 40th Street and N . E . 44th Street 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . 5'. Size of Property : f 5 .4 acres 6 . ' Access : Via Lincoln Avenue N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning : G-9600, General Classifi- cation District ; minimum lot size 9600 square feet 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : G-9600 ; B-1 , Business Use ; RS-9600 (King County Zoning ) of properties east side of Lincoln Avenue N .E . and south side of N . E . 36th St . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Commercial 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on March 26 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 26 , 1980 . C . HiIISTOR '/MIAa✓IKGROUND : The subject .site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #2079 of February 12 , 1964 at which time the present zoning classification was applied . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER LYLE PICKLE , R-020-80 APRIL 8, 1980 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL TAC GROG iD: 1 . '; Topography : The subject site generally rises from east to west to a plateau in the mid-section where it then slopes downward to the westerly border . Slopes range from 10-40% in the northerly portion and from 20-50% in the southerly section . 2 . Soils : Norma sandy loam (No ) . Permeability is moderately rapid. The ' seasonal water table is at or near the: surface . Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight . Stream overflow is a severe hazard in places . This soil is used mostly for pasture . Drained areas are used for row crops . 3 . Vegetation : The site consists of a dense undergrowth of blackberries and brambles with significant Douglas Fir and Alder scattered around the fringes . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : The middle portion of the subject site is subject to seasonal high water and some water was observed in this area (March 25 , 1980 ) . 6 . Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped at the present time . A few single family residences are located to the south and east with an apartment complex under construction situated to the northeast . Some storage garages are to the northwest and properties Lo the north are in various stages of fill and grade in preparation for future development . E . I EIGIHI,TORH0®® CHARACTERISTICS: : The surrounding properties consist of a mixture of scattered large-lot single family residences and developing commercial properties . F . P TLIC SERVICES : 1 : Water and Sewer : A 12". water main runs north-south along Lincoln Place N . E. adjacent to the subject site while the 18" Jones Avenue sewer is from 0-300 ' west . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Dept . per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #240 operates along FAI-405 within 4 mile to the northwest of the subject site . 4.. Schools : The Kennydale Elementary School is approxi- mately lZ miles to the south of the subject site while McKnighy Junior High School is within 22 miles to the southeast and Hazen Senior High School is approximately 4 miles to the southeast . 5 . Recreation : Kennydale Lions Park is located within 2 miles to the southeast of the subject site while the North Highlands Park is approximately 22 miles to the southeast . G . A1PIPEICRAMILIE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER LYLE PICKLE , R-020-80 APRIL ;8, 1980 PAGE THREE 2\, Section 4-711 , B-1 , Business Use . H . lAPIPLICk LE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 , Comprehensive Plan, 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6, page 18 . I . IMPACT OF THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezoning of the property will not directly affect the subject site . However , subsequent development will remove the vegetation, disturb the soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . 2 . , Population/Employment : Increased employment oppor- ' tunities could be expected with the construction of commercial buildings . 3 . Schools : Not applicable. 4., Social : Increased opportunities for social inter- action may result in the additional employment generated . 5 . Traffic : The traffic levels can be expected to ' increase . However , the exact amount would be better • addressed at the time of specific site development . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW-43-21C , a declaration of non-significance has been prepared by the responsible official for the rezoning approval only. Future environmental review at the time of development will be required with a site plan approval to address site development specific impacts . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . L . PLANNING DEPA TNENT (ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed rezone to B-1 is consistent with the Comprehensive. Plan land use designation of commercial for the subject site and surrounding areas . 2 . Development of the area in the past has been limited by the availability of both sewer and water facilities . At the present time a new line has been constructed into this area thus allowing the general vicinity to develop . Several fill and grade permits have been issued to the north of the subject site to allow development of similar commercial facilities . To the northeast of the site a major condominium project is under construction in King County. 3 . The topography of the subject site varies greatly. The middle area is a plateau and the northern and southern portions of the site slope between 10-50% . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER LYLE PICKLE , R-020-80 APRIL 8, 1980 PAGE FOUR This would suggest that there would be significant problems with the actual development of the site into commercial uses . Generally commercial uses require a fairly level site , substantial amounts of fill and grading appear to be a prerequisite of development of the site . However , development could be arranged in several plateaus . But because of the limited size of the site (5 acres ) it would probably not be applicable if the site was to be developed into one local shopping center . The topographic feature alone suggests that further site plan review should be conducted by the City prior to the actual construction of the development . 4 . \ The present land uses in the area are primarily single / family residential on large lots . The natural vegetation , has been retained in most of the area and suggests a very forest-like development . Development is happening rapidly to the north and the availability of water and sewer suggests the site may be totally developable as commercial property . There should be some concern expressed ' for the buffering of the large lot single family residential to the south and east. The Renton Comprehensive Plan calls for a buffer strip of medium density multiple family residential along the southern boundaries of this ' property . However , until that is developed the commercial would abut directly upon established single family residential . Therefore it would seem valid that a buffer strip of natural vegetation supplemented with additional evergreen planting be required along the ( southern 50 ' of the property . The western boundary of the property is adjacent to established commercial , and light industrial uses . Some of those uses are probably ' transitional in nature and the total area becomes more commercialized . 5 . \ The site is located at the extreme north end of the ,May Creek Valley , which is designated as a conservancy environment by the Renton Shoreline Master Program . ,The site is located 3'50+ feet from May Creek , and thus .beyond the 200 foot shoreline development zone . Sensi- tivity should be followed in assuring compatibility of this rezoning to future low intensity uses along May Creek . 6 . .The applicant ' s justification for the rezone application is attached. 7 . - Items L-1 , L-2 , and L-5 appear to provide ample justifica- tion for a rezone given the criteria outlined in Sections 4-3014 (A) ( 1) and 4-3014 (A ) (3 ) of the Land Use Hearing Examiner Ordinance . M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the above analysis , it is recommended that the request for rezone , File No . R-020-80 from T-9600 to B-1 be approved subject to the following conditions : 1 . Site plan approval by the Hearing Examiner prior to the issuance of a, building permit . 2 . No clearing and grading of the site prior to the approval of the Hearing Examiner. 3 . Reservation of a 50 foot wide landscaping strip in the form of an easement along the southern boundary of the property to include additional plantings of evergreen trees . . • • Ilk ,,,A''''14'.. i.:,'•.; :::i - , ... . . • .,: ,.• i • c•-,..• . .,.., : , i . i ...:ELE,m.. , •.,.... , —• . • scmc ; i.I i .; ---:': - ..--::•:.i, ,,,..:„,....1.• •• i t. ; i'..','; i .". • . 1,, .••3 ,. , /.1 i 1,• • • - . , .,..,',.„/•1,:',.. * /, . l•,,, . , • • 1 ., • „ l 1 1,'.! , -. N... . C9 ."•':'' ' 1 SE 72ND i , o ,; . 'k i4.- ,e,7.11.- ga 11 .:1,„ IQ 4,:•:,:"5.,'tirj lii PI :`. . 1 ST 4 ' . • •• • 1 l• i „...:, :.• . 1 ; .-t -„. i ..,..,,,• t. ..•:,f j. ., 4-I.‘ i 0,,,rt . , 2.1 -0 -•,..i, ' • ''''' ,'.1 i .4 ,,/;••;, . .z.,,, •Iti _od ,I' „t•i' . • P's t ,.,. ,,, ;''' .. 23 t ,,. 1/47A,,,,,,,,, .', N '•- ' • 4 4 t ,....T4,n•. ;;Al. 1- • # .. ; l'i,..!',. .110Ze‘ V.,,., 4.4 1, 4; . • '4.,',- ' ! .ts ,• t „.. 1., , elle.. •S•A it... ra ,;C:. 10- .44I . , . , a•t';.;• '''. ; ' A i 4 # it 0 i ; .ISA te?,ek'14' 'k.4) ...-: • i:, ,, :,,.., -•Q'',,I.•'1.i.x*,,-';'•!'(;;;‘,:;ci. ., / i A 01.%/• . 4.) 'WO t,S1''''' ''' n. •. ,.,. ,, 1.• , '-''.•",-",:A. k ,•,,:,,,o.,... • - r ' :' ' ' , g - ',.. :- ••• 'si :,` I 0 i ili. ,14--.. " .1 Si W.r41.e....-4.!,1-;',. .1!.! , ("4'.. . • ! I •-0,.. '•N .. (SE 74TH ..- s T) , „, , ,:er.:•-• . • ,-;,-„:-.,,,,:r.,:- ,„.; ' t i " T, .... . ..*.n..4,-••••:iF.:, . / , , •'''• ,, :, , ir- • . •,'/ '-• . ' '' NI , .6.. • . ,i ,. Ul•••4••A' • '''..v. „ w% ', ..' '.its,..t, ,'4,.. ., -•i• ,..„.1 N:f ' •.;.., -,'•v-11 4 -‘,.., ,'" ,.•,,, .•.!i.1, • •:'',',.i, , ; ..,; '''' •- : , 4'.'04% '•4'', :, - € J SE ..,..!_...t , • ,,,-,..,(•••''., -.-'• .,-,, ^;,.;•:' .. , • • - „,... ;., ' - Vt''' 76Ym ‘..v.'L. ;,.,.T...,,sT.,....,:. . ,..,. t .,. i i • . ..i,..,:,,,,,,,y . :,.:•_,..---,,,,...'..,4i., • ' g iu e•;1 .—' ;, '1:;1.F.' ; i :', ., 1 TP f) i LLJ - ; •••••i'•••••., ,•..-.41 - e,-. ,,,' _:.•,..-1.!.4:.., t ' 4 • SE ' A -.2:: ...;''•,,`,:...,,'.''''',;,,',-,, '. • •1,.- ..• ,*1,04 13 v t..i.it• I . I.'‘.'...',,,:';;Ii... :'.% 1 • ." . , ) r ''.A;:.'',' `' . t.37' ,.e, • •f . • *.r, I,...,` t rt c , •'%,,•'; • ''` - • ' ..: '' ' . ' ' , , !°' .41.11:4%,,'. -r.'1' " . • 0 - , SE 7;.. . 4:z P.Z.,...?,,, la f ,-A.... ••,,,,.„0",i,..c,":,,,...•, -:•,.•.;'• , , , ; ‘1,-;,,, • ,, it.'.'...'1,7'..'%7:-..07 r, s't,r,r. , Ai :-.C.'.'‘ ''..'!"4 .. k! ' r ''..': „r, ,..•",-,,, . • .-:' '' ; PI Ligk.• ...:.e..,,..0-J•,:):,.;11.",,i.:.,y,F,:,1 !.-3,-. ,. . ,,,..e!',',--.•4,1: si ' P, r - g , , -01,1'.' ,••.• gi 4 .... ,,}'' •'"V'S:.., ,. . •*, .4. 5 A 41... 41 ,,- i iv4E 44 ray 1 :-...i,-„,t,-2.4,:,,,4...1,,,,,, 11.).-0 ii • .•...,. .-":20..,"‘i,,i T 4, V.047St1 --f.•",;1•,-;;-:,',,r-'•'..'..,'&t;.,ri.;s, • ... - v• . 1 i',, 1,.*-*•1.:• F. • - It - ' ..1,411..•.-•....0,•,...ti.%,„)--: .:'• i ,• It ::, t ti %ciS4".,49. • ,cr• ii•,::i ,e11,. .-,,';'..,.0•1'1-.''1-• .• • , .,, - SF 14"..;,... , ,. Ix.. , • ifil.„I ...' ', ,I..:,,.:.'':,.„..,I.4..'2,,..,*,."1,...-!i.'',T..',.,4..:`..-,.`-f.A1,l4,k.:.;.'n,,,::;'.••.-".,.-,..i....-.ce,•'.4,/r*4..o.r-f'..'1.•i..,,.,;.-,!,•..,.. , ./,,%(;4.•••,4..i-',,."I•,4•'.•;••'.:-.,.;.,::''•.'i,t)'-.,\':,•j;:'.'...:t:,''','...-:...•_1,.,.-•.,•I 1...'t••:•,'.'t.'Vt:'i)t.. .f'ti4k i'..,.' '9aIt;L1,,1-.,,.k.4•ka:,,tiz,4,a'1•,:..::It.1.1*,I, re ••`•.4,,-.. k pr,61.T&;".r144'6'r':,,,9-.,,!;".r,a,:.*,''!,.0i.,..,f:t-':':.,••;:'.••.i1:t,:)..•.7,-1'),•-•,,4,112,,,,4-'34:::7•- 40,.,,,, k•A'' riliii•,ift ..r.e,1 k r. , .11y A,.,./A;r,`.7,..,.i..,r.7ws...I.',k.7:.,.‘,.—..`,.,-.,i7:,n,-t7',,..',",:.'14,7••'•'!'..-' r ' 'Y -.. t 1 ‘•* 4 .;.. '4,. . 'W7-r'' ''' 4'' ' '' '71/44'Y'L'.44-; irse .," . • . •••••.-• , ..? ••,, ,;„,i . ,• ,.iol,w,. , , %, .. „it.,:,,,,g• , • --;,. . t',en...4 . -..•,...1,,., 'P,'.V•.,TA i : ». —- ^ , r; 1 I ittA, 4.1i1,...--•;.'t,,*. . f A,'t,,O.A-14:•„•vt,..'12,-,t'io(r. 4"" t-.,,--r.F-i„, .: •:; ''' ,':.., t 1 1.:i.11', -''''''''.' V.ik*‘. • 7.4 . x • do i;'?i:40.‘':P-ii:-''.,4,T -#."4P 1...• cj. - ''''''s.,." .''f..-- ...3 .i; 0, 0 i j';:.,...,., .• ,,e4„ . r17,2. :•••*71L'it i..r.',•2•4: ',I .:••••ci •••!..,..., ,..,.. .1;,;,•,•••• •tri,ii. .,..•, 4 '1... . 4'''.T.,-... ..t • f:,,P- ,'-L1 '.2.,,,tr) ..t .1:0))`;‘,,'.!:'At i.,'1';',4,,i i .tell.ii• tt i . . ,I,Iii .....-4,„,,' ,'-,..,-;:, ,el's,','i-:.t'r 1 cAtt,•..• ,,,,,,.„.,,,,:IA:,i ,,-,4i,:' ,,Aftt: ,I..t;iir-Y.1• - ' it•A ... . k, ,...A, ,S' 1:`,,Ai'-,,,,,. , . -v-...'- ' .4,...„ . ,,, •. ,a `',1,1,,,14,-A,;'i;:v. ••:,..v.‘cl.r.. . , II 1...tit .,,_ ' vol", ... - . ,,,, • .,tAtz.), , . -.0, ,,,,,,,.. „... • . ... , -.,x. ,.,,r-:::, , ;, 40T H ST •1-,,,, '4',1.--';'.•,,, ;t,,,..'r•-..,.-: t.,• 7,/,,..,,. t, ,.1141,;.........4,„ cc i,,,1,. ....'..f,:r.Z.:i=:,,f';.i';'.if ..k . - I,‘ 7.,.N.i,„•15'••,',:., , .. :- • , . ..• ',..!'. .•'•••• . ' •'... v '• •,I• t 1 ' • ., :, t' f '',.,13.«1 :y-i.,,,k,., ,-F1-41 f;701. ,,,,-.'4,;A:.•4,s.,v.,.,,-P.,f,;;',.„tf.i.,,'. b42,..l..... 4. .A.4'.. 1. -.4;- ‘,- •-7.;,rtZ--."• ,' ).. .1 ' '"?' • ,;i:i,.N.,'40;i1VI''',1,4; ta • , . f t. 1 .•.„,,,,, 1,41 , , . . m.,,i,,, ,, ,. .,. ,„436 1 < ,.. ...... \,. . ,„),.,,34\i.,,t7, ,. i, /).4.41 '- ';;.c:',;',1.;;.';'r;iii• i,f •-tV'krit, elii.thA1 't '''';,Y.i,1 Vo......4., 4P.f.4. 0,'. ., - I t '',''J.;1 - , ''.1.. ", . '"r ; 1.;,::,t, ,"C) • •,af"Aa..11441 ; L'i-Tj.I:',,,l;V,4":..,1,Zatr,%.,, ,,,,r i ' i ST'•-', ' 4 ,- ..:-.i.:4,:•,,;'; ir , r t K ii I,▪ ,,,,,re lit' ., - k4;''1..;•'1!. !V", : ,..'*;.;,,.''3.a.,5 1111,.., '4 r• , 1 ' !1;',1:. 1 ''' ''''''At.-:.:- ' , ;,It r: :'.'!.:A • ,„.2....,:' :t.., .''' .,.1 ... AO,gj. .. ,•''.. X :.. .' ' . ' ''.i..;5':.• 4:1;I'.f.1';V.:A,%.?-44 ... ,•0 Vitaalja.`=•1641:711/0•''.. ''''' ',''''i s0..f '',40 ' * '." ';;;31; , ..,,Wl±kr •11,,,.•7' e. ' ,,_• %,4-.0k•1 ';'' ,4•LA i'• fr,A i`'''.."r ,.. i I°'4'..'91.4''' ,.•0 J.A.ise ' '4ti.'' .',.tet, ,;;)..4.'.:j.t`',,W.,;i. 1,- ."4 ,.. ,-'1 21 „:-.73%- ii, ...., ... -;,..0 .1147 N4— ''.' LAU lt'.. VA, .7"rn 1' 3•4•PA.-A,,-1,, .. .., .,„. 1 :.; z i it• I ..e.e '''l'7;-:' ,..;,.t. qi; ,,,,,.:. . , ,,...,•eft-v% .,•*;s.• j .i.„ ',1 ,-;.-.4t,•• / iti:,,,„--,-.4-J- '• -t. ., .4.•••a•Lir...1.• •...1 —i . ' i r,, . - -., -.....,--iixtt, ''_.,;'-.4,:,.•\ ,1''"4--,.P4-',,,,,„,p..,-,i LtA,..,.'.,,•„,,;*'v.,'-i4-i%ol,:z.;,,.i.,.-,t;:.-o..,r:t7,••.,,•.i.t1,,.,..,i.,.....,.1.•,,*:4;•,,',-*.ii1,N*,..1 f'-.'':'-'"..!.., ,44 •::„.2,-,,A-1.,1•1,.'''=''''4,t'''`'-'' .'4,, ::,:,', •a4 - A;'-,` ''',7„:„..•..`-,I. d•tr '..4.-..a.,, '- "-4 .r..,,'-„4t., B 6T 1-41 , T ."4,44.,,cf.,. `t"-x''PH 1.41.4c1 ' ,.-;1:ae,J.,''.',A.,,,,c-1-141,4•''s;.'i•,`,: • .. •• ..-,,,•••• e.-1",,,,-...A tt::,7.4.„, i'../i/ 7'", i;.,,, 4,,, z-.:,,„./: - ','?' Vst:4,4,y, '. , ''V:T7',,,,4014-i.lbek4CA1 ,,,,:.,.•'.."',„,,,.,':`.',-";:::.'4tte.. .4'...';?. .I..; ''-fi.' • .-, •:,',''.'•',11.,,'',•:L. ..,.'•`.-,:'•.:1..'' 1:11U1k1",14 •,, .. , ,I., r`44-';'4' ". 7,,. • ? ..,7..',. 0,A, )*•_-•,:- Pt'',( VC-,s. .Y.; '-':,`'-'''''i•'!', „4::$'-.N-t: •. ,a„; l',.),,ft-c,, i ' • •31,4•E r.i.-4A. -. e.;e , .11 .,:guyevtAri,, ' " 'V j ',!. ',.. 3':'•••,,i,A4-!A.A4'-',;4'ik'-';* I**(4,% V. '..-:,!...•. :•'.:..:•';-'.1,',.:,;,.,ir'[c..-.",'"i*.:,1,'' ' '•'t t;.°: 1.7-7 '''N.,"1°1 • t'"'It,."I'''.4.' ,4;47,/, :, ..,it.'„A,,,;,„*,..t,?, `,.,,,,,;,,,, :.!,.;40 5 t„2.,,,,,..1,...'',, • , '444'''',5'VI? 61 t : •441;;;4-1* ' 1:-'4,11•111.4q!.''" 4. .A .:c:',,,,••X" -4.. ', Att.,;;.,tk,„•,/ '.-'A3-'''' •''1,t t2li.t‘.. "..i,, ."-':"'Aitt-40.'il ",e, :..."....,,,! -,'-",dzi=?•:.1‘.1t:::9...... .64., 1 itiare:/‘. SI ' ..,1 ' 'r4 's, Ile' 'i?:,..tigl.t. '1/4.',',0' ' ,'''' f ott-• ' •,i, ,,' .. . 'EX1 --TiN6 , 4,4 ./.. 4 .. ,f' f IL Alt N.fr • g ' hg.14•7••,• '!..-1..6 Nr4 C- Com Ob4e re(ail SP-5;ti3terla.m; i tif le PitZP-pu L b aC/4v stel-Rilit. Lb- i6tvbe_445,1y III vi.1••i3 pip— thleiReerCeite6Y; tetp- rtileAet/' : DieilS•tity inv!4ipta I*4010:01 ,17 tqe, -T-- dret dodred.I ieete'N ie-/ a Z"--/ 'aU.iiriL`]Ndflnxi.nr�cxav,i•.;tnnf°—�`=''" *�iD. 1C:'L"P""8A4 -- -+z^'° _• Renton Planning Department a ) 261616 DEVLL'JPI"EiJT APPLICATIOIJ REVIEW'! SHEET Applicat n: RE2ONEM•ba• ... :' ,: Ivta13,4 ,c44r1141, • ccur.neriidAugateill a• etici ' ,- e' Pe222cnot Ii? nrilekthdieS 0*I Location : ' .y - , . , n AIs ve` o�Wtpes NE9 1 • • Nr Applicant : ' nb[ktf� lelye_ TO: Parks Department / SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: tWge,/ Police Department A. R. C. MEETING 2 7 80 Public Works Department ' Engineering Division J affic Engineering .i' ''• Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department , ' c '. NS OR MEMOS R Qfl IfIGISAL OOU OIDD 0FOAA REV I1 CONFERS CE (A Lp BE Ht) O NE D 0� ,,, _ • — AT 9:00 AM IN TIE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE I . 'OLJk DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT Bg ABLE TO ATTgNpOTHE ARCON PEAS PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:UREVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: )( Approved Approved with conditions , Not Approved t)po►., d e ve top .e...-4- o//},'/e /s.,"v-.-vave.., a 7'- 1VCse/C/ Z.e. "7-G 41J✓eci /�iCtsidi. s/ ' E'c/ /I.;4/7:9? , • C!‘. .----,';;:-c /-• 7.--,,,-77e...—___ .34//a).) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative na+o __ ._... .., , 11 J-iii hi-viy1- _,_______ o _________ __a.. REVIEWING ' DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Licj! c_` \Approved Approved with conditions ____Not Approved • • c . .: —� --- 3 —,20 —�X� — - '2-- +teAuthorized r or Representative Date ,l I i a.iu iny uepa rzmenti DEVE ' + 116 ( eo TENT T APPLICATION REVIEW ET Application: EZ®ifi tal.,0 ,0.0.. 6 IQ-.146ti, 16 alirtiverrealaUtyel ,u4i ' er Po7- • gVs t�'ifihebr Location: ,�` . ; rfart(COI 1 Eweh Atryolgs . 4 NC 'I 1 :V Applicant : ' k1e L,j/i' .... _ TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE:; tP/$49e, Police Department A. R. C. MEETING 3 f 77/ 0 Public Works Department Engineering Division : t.. Trraaf.ftic Engineering 1P�uilding Division . • Utilities Engineering , Fire Department - Pin'i lit 2FMG ETAPLIC çifl I QVTSCC E ENCEOP�ARC9UTO RE HPit).'fi'8V r` AT 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ., OUR DEPARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT B ABLE TO ATT NQDTHE NC PEAS PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IIY �. PM REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7J�( `7 _ a / A.pproved Approved with conditions Not Approved S 7/7 6/J1 ( .,,,/ ;.!,y7( / ( t/a/t;t',--/6j -•'-- 7 ----41) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved c/" Approved with conditions Not Approve. E x 71 er,,.'a— G 1 -1 . se...) At- /►'1-�L -iy tom. c.,(__ c,i,, 4t- , 4.ti•Q Z L-/ /t c / & 4v-G Al/L g2 at y Y-L 6,..: V e / 1+i.f Vt) V- fr., q•- ,e . Z-c S i'-i-e 'o /ve- 44/ 4 s 7L ( / 9' ', • C=2?0----,44,‘„__ 3 2-Y/F-0 Signature of Director or Authorized RepKesentative sate .Y; PROPOSED/FINA ECLARATION OF SIGNIFICAN( NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-020-80 ® PROPOSED Declaration - Environmental Chec€klist_ No. ECF-549-80 XO FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant seeks a rezone of--- - the subject site from G-9600 to B-1 for future commercial development . • Proponent LYLE PICKLE West side of Lincoln Avenue N.E . between Location of Proposal N .E . 40th Street and N .E. 44th Street. Lead Agency RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have 0 not .have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® is is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030(2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration of non-significance is approved for rezoning only . Future environmental review at the time of development will be required with a site plan approval to address site development specific impacts. Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Offici l Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plannin D4.3,ector 1 /Date Apri3 :l;...1980 Signature '�' : `� �; �C�i ty of Renton / / ;,' • Planning Department 5-76 Pickle 5 Acre Rezone City of Renton Justification For Rezone Application I . Location The subject property is located in the NE 1/4 Section 32 , Township 24 North , Range 5 East , W.M. The Sub- ject parcel is more particularly described as Lots 5 and 8 of Block 2 and Lots 1 and 2 of Block 3 of C .D. Hillman ' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division #7 together with vacated City street ; less the south 40 feet . The subject parcel is located in the southeast quadrant of interchange number 7 of Interstate 405 . Access to the property is from Lincoln Avenue NE bounding the east prop- erty line of the site . II . Existing Land Use During construction of I-405 , the sub- ject parcel was used as a borrow site and a large portion of a knob was removed. The site is not now developed and is covered by a young growth of native trees and brush. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential , light industrial , and storage garage . An apartment complex is currently under construction immediately north of the site . A motel is proposed for development at the off-ramp of the I-405 interchange within 500 feet of the site . (See Land Use Map ) . Most of the existing residences in the area are older homes situated on _larger lots with considerable separation between residences . Most of the land between residences is undeveloped or used as pasture orchards , etc . As mentioned above , more recent develop- ments are progressing in the direction of high density housing, industrial or commercial activities . There has been no new residential construction in this area in the past several years . III . Public Access and Utilities Because of the close proxi- mity of Interstate 405 and the interchange located just north of the subject site , access to the property is ideal . No traffic hazards or conflicts are anticipated to occur due to approval of the rezone to B-1 . "90%" of the expected traffic volume will be directly to and from the freeway , resulting in negligible impact on surrounding areas . Both public water and sanitary sewer facilities are avail- able adjacent to the site . A 16 inch water line exists along the south boundary of the parcel , and the May Creek Sanitary Sewer Interceptor is adjacent to the northwest corner of the site (See Land Use Map ) . The construction of these utilities has provided the needed services to support any of the activities permitted under B-1 zoning regulations . These utilities were installed fairly recently, and generally represent the beginning of more intensive development . IV. Compatability of Proposed Use Current zoning of the sub- ject parcel is R-1 , although the Comprehensive Land Use Plan a. s Page -2- for the City of Renton permits this area to be ultimately zoned to B-1 . Development trends in the immediate vic- inity include an apartment complex and proposed motel as well as an existing light industrial building and a storage garage . These existing and proposed uses would be compatible with the uses permitted under B-1 zoning . Possible usages of the subject site may include multi-family residential , shopping center, medical center or business plazas . These activities would be compatible with existing and planned developments , and in addition, existing utility and transportation facilities are more than adequate to support these types of activities . The proximity of the site to 1-405 does not support a residential development on this parcel . Aesthetic ' s , noise levels and topography would result in a low quality residential area . V. Conclusions We are of the opinion that circumstances have significantly changed in the surrounding area to support the rezone to B-1 . This opinion is based on the following facts : • 1 ) Excellent access to the site is available from Interstate 405 at interchange number 7 within 500 feet from the site . 2) Recent installation of sewer and water services adjacent to the site have established these ser- vices to an area which was before lacking these public utilities . 3) Existing land uses as well as proposed developments in the immediate vicinity are compatible with the activities permitted under B-1 zoning restrictions . 4) The request for rezone to B-1 would be compatible with the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan. • Pickle 5 Acre Rezone City of Renton Justification For Rezone Application - - .I . Location- The s Ib jest property is located in` the- NE 1/4 - - - - - - Section 32 , Township 24 North , Range 5 East , W.M .. The Sub- ject parcel is more particularly de:,crLbed as Lots 5 and 8 • of Block 2 and Lots 1 and 2-of Block 3' of C .D . Hillman ' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division #7 together with vacated City street ; less the south 40 feet . The subject parcel is located in the southeast quadrant of interchange number 7 of Interstate 405 . Access to the property is from Lincoln Avenue NE bounding the east prop- erty line of the site . II . Existing Land Use During 'construction of I-405 , the sub- ject parcel was used as a borrow site and a large portion of a knob was removed. The site is not now developed and is covered by a young growth of native trees and brush. Surrounding land uses include single-family residential , light industrial , and storage garage . An apartment complex is currently under construction immediately north of the site . A motel is proposed for development at the off-ramp of the 1-405 interchange within 500 feet of the site . (See Land Use Map ) . Most of the existing residences in the area are older homes situated on larger lots with considerable separation between residences . Most of the land between residences is undeveloped or used as pasture orchards , etc . As mentioned above , more recent develop- ments are progressing in .the direction of high density housing , industrial or commercial activities . There has been no new residential construction in this area in the past several years. 111 . Public Access and Utilities Because of the close proxi- mity of Interstate 405 and the interchange located just north of the subject site , access to the property is ideal . No traffic. hazards or conflicts are anticipated to occur due to approval of the rezone to B-1 . "90%" of the expected traffic volume will be directly to and' from the . freeway, resulting in negligible impact on surrounding areas . Both public water and sanitary sewer facilities are avail- able adjacent to the site . A 16 inch water line exists along the south boundary of the parcel , and the May Creek Sanitary Sewer interceptor is adjacent to the northwest corner of the site (See Land Use Map ) . The construction • of these utilities has provided the needed services to support any of the activities permitted under B-1 zoning regulations . These utilities were installed fairly recently, and generally represent the beginning of more intensive development . 1V . Compatability of Proposed Use Current zoning of the sub- ject parcel is R-1 , although the Comprehensive. Land Use Plan Page -2- for the City of Renton permits this area to be ultimately zoned to B-1 . Development trends in t}1e irnmedgaLe vie- _ - -ini ty include an apartment -complex and proposed motel as well as an existing light industrial building and= a storage garage . These existing and proposed uses would be compatible with the uses permitted under B-1 zoning . Possible usages o the subject site may include multi-family residential , shopping center, medical center or business plazas . Thrse activities would be compatible with existing and planned developments , and in addition , existing utility and transportation facilities are more than adequate to support these types of activities . The proximity of the site t I-405 does not support a residential development on thi: parcel . Aesthetic ' s , noise levels and topography would . result in a low quality residential area . V. Conclusions We are of the opinion that circumstances h: vr significantly changed in the surrounding area to suppor the rezone to B-1 . This opinion is based on the follovr' ng facts : 1 ) Excellent access to the site is available from Interstate 405 at interchange number 7 within 500 feet from the site . :' ) PeeenL installaLion of sewer and water services adjacent to the site have established these se - • vices to an area which was before lacking these public utilities . 3 ) Existing land uses as well as proposed developments in the immediate vicinity are compatible with t e activities permitted under B-1 zoning restricti.ns . 4 ) The request for rezone to B-1 would be compatible wi Lh the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan. • it;; • 1 ,, l < r ; a 1.. Ty GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY' ,LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LINCOLN PLACE N.E . BETWEEN N .E . 40TH STREET AND N.E. 44TH STREET . LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S' POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON APRIL 8, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 A.M. NM. CONCERNING ITEM la( •,^ EZONE TOPLICATFileN FRR020Z80E FROM G-9600 B- r • SPECFA .. , IT1 E' • r SITE APPROVAL • WAIVER HO - ELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 8 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A .M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . RAY 'ALIMENT , APPLICATIONS FOR TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL , File 017-80 ; WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File W-01B-80 ; AND, EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING ROADWAY WIDTH , File E-025-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 2421 Meadow Avenue North. 2 . JACK R . RING , APPLICATIONS FOR THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL , File 014-80 ; EXCEPTIONS TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING LOT WIDTH AND ROADWAY WIDTH , Files E-015-80 and E-026-80 ; AND WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File W-016-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 2413 Meadow Avenue North . 3 . A .A .D. INVESTMENT CO , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-2 AND R-3 , File R-022-80 ; property located on the southeast corner of Duvall Ave . N .E . and Sunset Blvd . N .E . 4 . A .A.D. INVESTMENT CO . , APPLICATIONS FOR THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL , File 443-79 , EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING ACCESS , File E-444-79 , AND WAIVER OF' OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File W-445-79 ; property located on the southeast corner of Duvall Ave . N .E . and Sunset Blvd . N.E . 5 . LYLE PICKLE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-9600 TO B-1 , File R-020-80 ; property located on the west side of Lincoln Place N .E . between N .E . 40th Street and N .E . 44th Street . Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 8 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A .M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : March 26 , 1980 GORDON Y . ERICKSEN , RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , ROGER BLAYLOCK , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES , ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing King County , on the 21st day of March . SIGNEeD;Olpite.dew--304f_Getv OF J A. s .-,,, o THE CITY OF RENTON to MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 O ® r - _ Z '' k BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,0 co- 235- 2550 0e. ,91TED SEPIEt° March 21, 1980 Lyle Pickle 1115 North 33rd Place Renton, Washington 98055 Re : APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 to B-1, File R-020-80 property located on the west side of Lincoln Place N .E . between N.E. 40th Street and N.E . 44th Street Gentlemen : / The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 17 , 1980. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for April 8 , 1980 at 9:00 a.m., Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : Roger J . Bla lfock 9 Y Associate Planner cc : E .L . Munson 809 Monroe N.E . , Renton 98055 Cavness Engineers Inca 201 S. Division, Suite B. , Auburn 98002 R44/:;\\\I CITY OF RENTON S \IE \ RUONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY FEB 25 1 E0 LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. OR6 --ePd EXAMINER 'S ACTION 4 APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED /,'r, *¢ RECEIPT NO . CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE ORDINANCE' NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name Lyle Pickle Phone 255-7679 Address 1115 North 33rd Place , Renton, WA 98055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on West side of Lincoln Avenue between NE 40th Street and NE 44th Street 4 . Square footage or acreage of property Approximately 5 .4 acres 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) Lots 5 and 8 of Block 2 and lots 1 and 2 of Block 3 of C .D . Hillman ' s Lake Washington Garden of Eden, Division #7 together with vacated city street ; less the South 40 feet . • 6 . Existing Zoning R-1 Zoning Requested B-1 NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request" may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7 . Proposed use of site Use to conform to requirements as established by City bf` Renton B-1 zoning; actual use not defined at this time . 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. A comprehensive drainage plan to City of Renton standards ; improvements to Lincoln Avenue NE and NE 40th Street ; adequate on-site parking 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Within two years 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 / - AFFIDAVIT • • I , , / c<f7 , being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this,2,j'� day of k rv7 , 19 '7/ , • Notary Public in and for the State of • Washington, residing at /p,/,, (Name /6f Notary /P blic) (Signature o Owner) Po 7 77a-7 ()-c 7z `Address) (Address) • (City) (State) (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the_.foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found tondo and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules anted ril 2la7 ns of the Renton Planning Department governing the filinrq'Qf f' Paz ation . Date Received , 05 1S3O, 19 i By: • ��/✓� G ��>°` Renton Planning Dept : 2-73 OITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM pF REjV), RECEIVED � 1 FEB 25 1960 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' ,Q ` A, I Application No. i/ — 0 d o -1 D 9--..-.�---- ---�4� ,, Environmental Checklist No. ,EPA " 1 -�lJ � G Dl~Qp'�L PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy, Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply , just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. -- Name-of Proponent Lyle Pickle 2.' Address and phone number of Proponent: -- 111-5 North 33rd Place —Renton, WA 98055 -- - p.55-7679 3-.- - Date-Checklist submitted 4. -Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: NONE 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : SEE ATTACHED -2- • 1 v i 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : SEE ATTACHED • 8. Estimated date for.completion of the proposal : Fall 1981 9. List of' all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal' ' (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone to R-3, grading permit, building permit 10. . qo you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: NO 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes; explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Rezone Application • II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) ( 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X ES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x YES MAYBE FIB (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED • -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAYBE- NO • (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . X YES- MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature , or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED • • • • • (3) Water. ,Will the proposal result in: (a), Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either' marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MBE NO '(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? • YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? }}{{ YES MAYBE N(1 • (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception 'of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO • (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X • YES MAYBE NO _ Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? Y MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? • X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or • in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing X species? YES MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: . SEE ATTACHED • -4- '° (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in : (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE TT— _ Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? _�_ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X 7E7 MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? YES MAYBE TM-- Explanation: SEE ATTACHED -5- • ( 12) Housing. Will t,. proposal affect existing' housing , or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: . • SEE ATTACHED • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on 'existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? _X_ YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X YES MAYBE NO (d) ''Alterations to present patterns of circulation or - movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED ' . (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? _IL_ YES MAYBE NO - -- (b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:- (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES . MAYBE NO - -- (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X YES MAYBE NU' Explanation: SEE ATTACHED (16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO • City of Renton Planning Department • ATTACHED EXHIBITS I . BACKGROUND 6 . DESCRIPTION: The subject parcel is currently zoned R-1 although the Comprehensive Land Use plan for the City of Renton provides for ultimate zoning of B-1 . Although exact usage of the subject parcel has not been defined as yet , • the developer is requesting a rezone of the property to B-1 in conformance to City of Renton ' s comprehensive land use plan. This zoning classification provides for diversified uses ranging from single and multiple family residences to shopping centers and business plazas . Exact usage of the parcel will be defined following approval of the rezone to B-1 and analysis of feasibility with respect to economic and environmental factors associated with each potential use . For purposes of completing this environmental checklist , the most restrictive use of multiple dwellings will be used to identify the social , environmental and economic impacts to the area surrounding the subject parcel . Within the impact area surrounding the subject parcel , development and zoning has progressed in conformance with the City of Renton ' s Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Existing usage in the area includes a proposed motel as well as apartments . Currently there are no single family developments located in the immediate area. 7 . LOCATION: The project site lies on the west side of Lincoln Avenue Northeast and extends north from Northeast 40th Street approximately 783 feet . During construction of Interstate 405 , the site was used extensively as a borrow site . During this borrow activity, a large portion of a small hill was removed for roadway embankment . The site is now sparsely covered with native grasses , brush and young trees . ii . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 . EARTH: Construction of the parking lot and foundations may create some small temporary unstable earth condition, but the finished parking lot and buildings would contain no unstable earth conditions . Construction would necessitate some disrup- tions , displacements , compaction and overcovering of the soils, but cuts and fills will be kept to a minimum and eleva- tions will be designed to fit the existing topography. The changes will be kept to the upper soil layers and will not affect the adjacent property. There will be a temporary increase in the likelihood of both wind and water erosion of soils due to the uncovering of earth in construction. Since this project site is relatively flat , and there is no history of heavy winds in this area, erosion can be kept to a minimum even in periods of heavy construction activity . Temporary measures will be taken to ensure that no sil-laden storm water 'is released off-site during this susceptible construction period. 2 . AIR: Heavy equipment used to build roads and utilities will emit the usual products of internal combustion engines . This diesel exhaust may be darker at times than gasoline exhaust , and more noticeable . The odor of this diesel exhause may be considered objectionable but it should disperse before it can bother any neighboring residents . 3 . WATER: The change from gravel and brush to paved parking areas , rooftops and lawn areas will modify the absorption rates and drainage patterns somewhat . The total runoff will be kept the same as for undeveloped land by construction of a total integrated storm collection and detention system to City of Renton standards . -1- II . ENVIRONMENTAL IN- CTS (continued) Since flood waters now sheet flow unrestricted across this property there will be a .slight alteration of their course . Water will be collected' in the parking areas and divered to the City of Renton storm water system. The use of city water and sewer systems will eliminate the most obvious withdrawl and addition problems to the groundwater since no wells or septic drainfields will be needed. 4. FLORA: This project will reduce the number of native plants , introduce decorative shrubs and form a barrier to the replen- ishment of the original brush. No rare or endangered species of flora are known to grown on this land, but any that are discovered will be preserved. 5 . FAUNA: No large animals are known to inhabit this property but some small animals such as squirrels and moles will have to relocate to the undeveloped area surrounding this project . No unique , rare or endangered species are known to inhabit this property but if any are discovered, steps will be taken to ensure their survival . No known species use this area for migration. 6 . NOISE: It is not anticipated that noise levels will create an adverse impact in the area. This is due to the lack of critical noise receptors adjacent to the site as well as the site location with respect to Interstate 405 and its accompany- iny high noise levels . Noise levels will be highest during construction of the proposed project but again this will be mitigated by the close proximity of the interstate . It is not anticipated that the completed project would create noise levels in excess of the standards established by the City of Renton building regulations for any of the permitted usages for B-1 zoning . 7 . LIGHT AND GLARE : This project would increase light and glare in the area, especially if multi-story buildings are erected. However, the increase is not anticipated to create an objection- able effect on the impact area and will be similar to the existing light and glare from the City of Renton. 8 . LAND USE: The existing parcel is currently zoned R-1 , however, the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates this area to be zoned B-1 . Development and zoning trends in surround° ing areas have been in conformance with the City of Renton Land Use Plan. Existing developments in the area include a proposed motel and existing apartments . Currently the subject parcel is vacant with a sparse covering of native grasses , brush and young trees . The site was used during the construction of Interstate 405 as a borrow area. The proposed rezone to B-1 will provide incentive for reclamation of the subject parcel and open way for a development compatible with surrounding land uses . 9 . NATURAL RESOURCES : Except for the relatively small amount of fuel and material used to build this development , there will be no depletion of nonrenewable natural resources. As the use of natural resources is indirect proportion to the population, this project will relocate some of the existing consumption to this area. 10 . RISK OF UPSET: This project does not plan to use any unusual materials, equipment , fuels, or techniques in construction so risk of explosion or oil release , while possible , is very remote . 11 . POPULATION: Depending upon the usage selected for the subject parcel , population of the area could be significantly affected. -2- I I . ENVIRONMENTAL IPi,_ ;CTS CONTINUED Business or shopping center developments would not directly affect the population of the area although such developments may encourage residential growth elsewhere in the surrounding area. If the parcel should be developed as a multi-family residential district a maximum of 270 dwelling units could be constructed on the site . 12 . HOUSING: If the subject site is developed as a multi-family residential district under B-1 zoning restrictions, a maximum of 270 dwelling units could be constructed on the parcel . These would provide additional housing for the rapidly expanding population of this area. Development of the parcel as a shopping center or business plaza would not directly affect the housing within the area but the avail- ability of goods or services provided by this type of develop- ment may encourage housing developments in surrounding locations . 13 . TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: Because of the close proximity of Interstate 405 and interchange , traffic is not anticipated to create a detrimental offset on the circulation of traffic , traffic patterns, or the movement of goods. The largest traffic generation would be anticipated from the development of the site to multi-family residences. This type of devel- opment would be expected to generate approximately 1350 additional vehicles per day. This traffic would primarily be directed to Interstate 405 via Lincoln Avenue Northeast . During development of the subject parcel , improvements would be made to both Lincoln Avenue Northeast bounding the site on the east and Northeast 40th Street on the south. These roadway improvements as well as site access locations would be developed to City of. Renton standards to create a safe and efficient transportation facility capable of carrying the increase in traffic generated by the proposed development . Adequate on-site parking would be provided in accordance with City of Renton standards for any of the several devel- opment alternatives allowed for B=1 zoning. During the project development design phase , plans for roadway improvements as well as parking facilities would be coordinated with the City of Renton to insure an overall ' system compatible with long range transportation system planning and goals . 14. PUBLIC SERVICES : This proposal will increase the need for all the above-mentioned public service agencies as well as the postal service, and to a lesser extent the many other governmental departments serving this area. Since these services are now available in the adjoining developments and since modern paved roads will serve this area, the agencies involved should have little trouble serving the development and the increased tax base should result in a general upgrading for all concerned. 15 . ENERGY: Since energy use, like use of natural resources, is dependent on population, this proposal will relocate some of the energy users to this area. Neither the construction nor the finished project will use unusual amounts of fuel or energy. Existing sources of energy will be used. 16 . UTILITIES : Electric power, telephone, water and sewer are available . These utilities will be able to serve this develop- ment with little alteration. A comprehensive storm water drainage system for this development will be constructed to City of Renton standards . 17. HUMAN HEALTH: The addition of population to an area would by itself increase the health hazards; however, it is not antici- pated that any unusual health hazards will be created by or inflicted upon either the workmen constructing this project ar those who will use the proposed development . Care will be taken to follow the letter and intent of health and -3- II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS CONTINUED safety regulations during construction. ' 18 . AESTHETICS : Development of the subject site would include landscaping to provide an aesthetically pleasing project . If the development should include the construction of multi-story buildings, their placement and orientation would be planned to minimize obstruction of view of Lake Washington from adjoining properties to the east. 19 . RECREATION: New residents will take advantage of the existing nearby recreational opportunities. Their support should result in an upgrading of such facilities in this area. The project site is not now being used as a recreational facility so development should have no impact in this regard. 20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL: No structures or significant archeo- logical or historical digs are known to exist on the property, but any finds that turn up will be taken to competent authorities and steps taken to preserve them. -4- �d nT 1t1,��,R AL ESTATE CONTRACT { c .IT.. (OTt11 1N$.(.0. R 1 G14 , U-13 • In }:1 f,)�Fyx 14'ONO ". f' (CORPORATE FORM A-1964) 3 (n7 THIS CONTR1 p bd ••n�entered Into chit 5th der al April, 1977 1 c(rrgbetwoen Hunaon Investment Company ` . • gCCC horein•fl.r celled Iho".ells,"and Lyle L. Pickles , •• ril anofter c•Ild , the"parch... / -d WITNESSETH, Thet the sall.agn. to tell to the parch...and the parent...s�.. to parches•from.h•mall..the following cis...lied tool.slots,with thw annurrsnanri m.In King County,Stare of Washington. • a,„lit !..1 . .... . -Block 3 • re .00. . �. ':Hillman• 's Lake Washington Carden of Eden '7, Lot 1 b 2/and • (� Block 2 —_ ' L•,''' 1i;i j//o'41i't:S 6 8/together with the vacated City Street, Levee South 40 .J`1,��•'• poet as per King County Assoesors Map. f• ' 't `,.....a. I. • . 1, • , The term.and conditlan..f this contract ore as fallow.:The purchase print I. * * *Sixty Thousand and no/100. • * • A * * * * a * * * tl * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *,* �f 60,000.OQI Dollar.,of which • (.. i ** * *Fivo Thousand and no/100 •($5 000.00 )Dollar.ha.. bean paid,the receipt wh•r•of Is hereby acknowl•dg.d,end the bol once of.old parch°•.pricy shall be paid e.follow.: , A * * .Five Thousand and no/100* * * * * * Is 5,000.00 )Dollar., et w.r•et rch•.i.option,en or before the 5th day of July ,1977 ' end * * *Five Thousand and no/100* * d each 90 day. thereafter (f 5,000.00 ) Duller., yr • a were at parch...'s option,on or before lb.Note Belem.,of soch ding calendar month until,h•Wan".l said ' purees"price shell hon.boon fully paid. The parch.nr further apr.e. to pay inler•at on the dlmini,hing baldncs of maid -._ pn purchase prier.of the rots 1 8 5 par cant par•num the e 5th Jay of April , 19. 77 ! { which i m ta.'.hall to dedoctod'),o each installmentpoym.nt and the bofanc• of each payment applied In reduction ai _! principal. 1 . All payment.to be mode hereunder shell I.mod.. '•✓ a ni such other place as the seller may dir.'in writing. t' 1 i • Note: $5,000.00 each quarter until $20,000.00 hap been paid, then $5,000.00 semi- i ,� annually duo Juno 1st and December 1st for five years, including interest. / �In . 1 :I,d:8 FX(:1.S► la PAID r1/1(2cc1977 ` l II • i F4u892 i; As refereed t.In this consent,"dote et closing"shall be •--c (1) The purchaser•.sames and woes to paybolo,.delinquency all to...and men,. that may as b•tw•.n grantor • and•rant••h.r.frer bosome o lion on said nrol estate;nod it by the lam.of this contract the purchaser ha.a mod pay. want•f any mertgap,c.ntr.l ether•,aun,branae, has....mod poym.n,of o gn,sd to purchase•abj•n to,•ny to.. , if mania non a lien en sold tool.star.,the purchaser oar.,to►ey the earns before J•linay.nc y. r.l(2) The porches.sg...c,until 1h•porch,. price I.fully paid,to keep lh•buildings end har.ofr.r placed on said '' tit.,•In red to the ectuol cash calor.th•r.ol again..lo..or da,noa•by both lire and windstorm in a company occ•p'• r •bl•re the seller end for the.11a'.b.n.fi,.his mrer.sl may appear,and to pay all premiums th.,.for and to d•Ite•r all pollela,end renewals thereof to the.IIer. I4 , (3) The p rchosor.pre••that fall inept Non of said real eats.ha.been mod•end that .I,hor rho ll.r nor M.o sign. 1 i chill I.hold it.any co..n.nt r.sp.eling lh•condition of any Improe•m.n„ ,hereon nor shall tho parch...o tiler ow rhs 1 .signs of either be held to any..Dna..er egr.m.t for lterations,�improocn.snrs or r.p•ir.unl..,rhs to.•nont or aa.••• L� went r.11.1 an I.contained h•r.in or is in writing and attached to end mad•a part of this contrary. �p ) (4) The D chow...um.s ell hacard.of damoa.to or d.•tniction.1 any impro..m.nt.now on sold r.d estate or he.- VOw placed thereon,end I lh•taking of said real.slot.or any part ih.reol ler public a..;and ogre.that nosuch damage, lii J•.,c,clion ar Inking shall,•stirto• •Ilan of on.iderotion.In cos.any port of said rea .,taro I,tokanfor public ass, ` 1 tha portion at the tend.mnetion• and remaining an..p enI of • bl.sap I placating the. .hell b•paid r• ! . ,'' the soil.end.pplid.payment en tit•porahasa price herein unl.t,h•..liar•I.,I.r Ilow Ih.patch.,•,Is apply all orIj .CA •p•,tion of such condamnsion sand to rhs rebuilding or r•slasllon.1 any impro. .dermap•d by such robing.Inc •of .,q„ L� damage or d..ruction from a p.Nl Inwnd against.the pro soda of such insurana•r•maining oft..paym•n,of the reasonable m ..pens of procuring the ,.ma shall Ira devoted to lh• r•storalion or..building of such improvement.within•,•aeon able 11,,,, time.ants.patch..elects thet sold proca•ds shall be paid to tha sill•.for•pplicat,on on the parchate sic.he,.in. • (3) Th• ,,if., h. do iin.,.d et.gn•e to deliver within 15 day. sl ,hs do.• of closing.•purah.s.r'•policy of tole I ,urenc.in u.ndard fern, a,s commitment fharefor, Issued by Sacurlty Title In.urenc• Company of Washington in.ariny • the parch... to Iho full tit of , id pashas• pri against lass damoa• by..a. of deist In.Iler's till.to said red.......of Iho Jets•I dosing snd containing no...titian.•.her thou,h•following: , o. ►tin.d• 1 exceptions op/rearing In said policy lam; ' I. Liens er.mwmbr.nces which by Ih•roan.al this nonironl the porch...Is to...wow,or•c,e which the cen..yen. hereunder I.to is mad•subleat'end •. Any wining convect et cenvac is undo,which.Il.r is purchasing said real.note,end.ny mortgage other oblige. lien, which moiler by thls contract epee, ,o pay,none of which lot Ohs pmpo.•of this p.yr•plr(5)shall ba d..m..1 _ v. r-,•,., doled.In alleys title. /) If seller's title to,old r.l•.leis Is sub(•c to an ssisring contract contract.und.which soils.I.purchasing sold . \.'real , or any m e or orho,ebllp•tlan*filch sslier I.to p rt oller oars•• i..uch paym•nr.In acmor.mce ' rr—R 111 Itq rho t rme ,h.•el,onJ upon d•laul,, tits p,,.eka.er shall has,h• IyyM ro mob•any aymenr• s rho �t, r \\.1 Mleal,end am p.ym.nr o the pgmanr,eta Iallinp Ia.the m•IP.r under tits c.nrracr.rc I [� d'f,SAY 23 1977 8.90 t dlED aY F",top , ,t. 1 �� , a . �1 o ,•..., . \,6. ......----"' s a €NDIN ? OF FILE