No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA89-126 329 3 327 28 / 326 I 3 5�/ I 324 I / / I SITE PLAN 323 // // I I i 0' 20' 40' BOO' 80' 100' 3 2 SCALE : pia umn vim moms 111MI I 10' 30' 50' 70' 90' / ( / / I 1 l J DRIVEWAY w A%\. E o �� / / ' o ' I `NI // / I PARKING I O f i 5 Qy 321 / // I ' 40-1 I d �,t,`� // /" / z LL r i .: �O 320 / 1/ / //%'6W�� I 1 I I I- / c 319 i, / I 1 I Ii �; I-------i tet t] I I I 1 I I I r I 1 \ -323 N (TEMPORARY MODULAR /Iyy I Z 318 I I OFFICE UNIT, 12's(0'- I 1-------� \\ �I Q I I L---� KING COUNTY 0 < I 1 1 1 \ i 15LO" I SOUTHEAST 1 \0 \ \\ \ \ PUBLIC HEALTH F / I \ \ N N CENTER • 328 j 1 I ----I ) u i I IIIf Iz-_ I I PARKING - / I I \ I / I I 1 DRIVEWAY < < 1 < ( PROPERTY CORNER,T�/ I I I I -� I \ \ I 316 / / z I I T--' ; I ILI IL / toGPROPE/% LI E, YP� __1111 � /i i � -, �I _ =-�1/ /3 `3II�� =” 1) " / / I 317318320/32 — 231 jI'c_---`--32 404 /320 3223 27 3 28 328 W O� L RENTON VOCATIONAL • • i i ti — - Fq�� TECHNICAL INSTITUTE Lu' 1 i Z �J �FQ m I Q RESIDENTIAL ----1 -I0 ? to I a N.E. 4',4 CT. �� rt 1z r I I 1 u LLy -- L� NORTHEAST 47+ STREET -T— G1 JIAS STATION I I �, TIRE 5 TIORc;,./ __, _ T---1 ,„) ,, , , , , ____ __ , 4, . 3 / ' _ PROJECT SITE: y KING COUNTY TEMPORARY MODULAR ---L — ii - " ALThCETER Z / N oa /l o N I I a III co LJ z a _ I- KING COUNTY >. ROAD DISTRICT z NO.2 SHOPS o GRAVEL PIT ; 0 GRAVEL PIT I 0 _z Y ' REN TON CORPORATE LIMIT N VICIN ITY MAP w `„. E Ne 5C ALE . 200 O / S O : kENITON VOCATIONAL i -___ ---� ��ql 2 TECHNICAL INSTITUTE I ❑ I mac' > 'i i l - z yFQ > i R'c31D2N1TIAL --- I J a 2 Q a I i J ` ---J .c ---- � 11 _A I—I Li i a- c„ i ii z 1' l I I° F L 1 �� '❑ ❑ ice' lI 11 / ___ ;Np/ ! - - O I d Li Z a Cc 1- KING COUNTY } ROAD DISTRICT F- _ NO.2 SHOPS o GRAVEL PIT ; u GRAVEL PIT f 0 I z ?=N-^NJ -.R?CR?,-= _I AIT N VICINITY MAP w ` � E Ne SCALE . I = 200 -O , 5 ATCO Space Rental Division of ATCO Structures Inc ' ATCO Avenue South Kent �E L RENTAI Kent Washington 98031 I (206) 852 9320 Watts Line (800) 255 2826 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON • FEB 0 01990 L;ti QED January 30, 1990 Seattle King County Department of Public Health 110 Prefontaine Place So. Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 Attention: Ms. Barbara Hadley Reference: ATCO Blocking Diagram for Permit Submittals Dear Barbara: Please find the engineered diagram for the 12' X 60' office. The illustration shows the location and materials to be used for blocking as well as the cross anchor tie down systems to be installed. If I can be of further assistance, please call me at your earilest convenience. Also, please advise me of your progress with the City of Renton. Thank you for the opportunity to assist your office on this matter. Yours truly, >7 • Troy r la Area ':ales Manager Enclosures: As Stated TJ:tmb kirlho 329 utroascAe N. i,,,,zQ. 328 327 Mo 0uc.Prt& J tv Cr - 32G) I 3 / I3z4 / / / I SITE PLAN 323 / / // / I I 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 3 2 SCALE : mnmi.umun�nm1i�umm•1uamii•1 /10' 30' B0' 70 90 /' / / / / I / / / I I JDR IVE WAY N g-`e , / // I i f c W �•> 0 / / 1l I PARKING I Oa 1 5 �� 321 / / I I 1 0C 4� I I Z O- 0ourIlao fr 1re.e.s S'-b, l�cKwt AZ / } / �_ b �t;e,.S roan Tree 5=G Q' / / // //x LL_ Q U . o ..a.. 3' ,^-,,.,cur .�O 3 0 0 2__� ► I 1 3 / / r6il�. 1 1 in 319 1 I I I I I lWn1--- 1 1 \`�329 N TEMPORARY MODULAR O I _ L =_-_ I Z 31 f f IOFFICE UNIT, 12'i60' ?:, I ' I � 1 �; L__— KING COUNTY i \ \ 1 ` . \ Ø15.o" SOUTH EAST I \� / I 1 ` \ \ \ \ \__ \ PUBLIC HEALTH I N" F / ' \ \ CENTER i- 328 j —_s I O X// I � �— ) \ I I ► � liHH � ► __ ;II II s Y / f I PARKING— I \ \ �317 / I I I __ ) / I— J DRIVE WAY PROPERTY CORNER,TYP. j j I �— I I _ I / / / ( IIH[WH� IIIII /PROPERTY LINE,TYP _ _ �___�__ / / 16 /17_ 4 31 OI j,2rr�- `f� .\ 1 divil�--,\ \ \ G63i I///-0t31 I(7( ( �2/328 �328 • c,o�y ° �r0-I" CITY OF�REl TON eta �E2°J, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 'cCEarl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division February 13, 1990 Mr. Paul Murakami, CFam. Seattle King.County Health Department F 3001 N.E. 4th StrSoutheast PublicH�alth Center tS h EBB ee1990 Renton, Washington 98056 T lens, sT fact Subject: Temporary Office Modular Unit 3001 N.E. 4th Street File No.'s ECF;CU-126-89 Dear Mr. Murakami: I have had the opportunity to review the landscaping Plan submitted to our office on February 8, 1990, for the above referenced Conditional Use Permit application, and my comments in regards to this plan are as follows: 1. The plan received is a Super K reduction drawing. Because this Conditional Use Permit is a public hearing, we will need full size drawings of the landscaping plan as well for exhibits to present at this hearing. Please provide four (4) blue print drawings of the landscaping plan for our files. 2. The landscaping plan will need to provide some additional detail. The plan illustrates that two deciduous trees are proposed.. What species/variety are these trees to be? 3. The trees proposed (fir trees and deciduous trees) seem rather small in size. An increase in the planting size of these trees i suggested to 8-10 feet in height. In addition, the trees on the reduction drawing appear to be located very close to the modular building. In order-for these trees to branch out properly and to avoid possible damage to the building, the trees should be located further back. 4. Provide shrubbery landscaping along the east.and south sides of the building in addition to the other two sides. The shrubbery proposed may be ,sparse where illustrated and may need some additional plants to fill in. Its difficult to determine their actual spacing at the reduced scale drawing provided. Please provide this requested information at your earliest convenience in order for us to continue with our processing of the conditional use permit. Sincerely, Jerry F. Lind Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner JFL:murakami:dsk1l 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 1989 EFC - 126 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street SITE AREA: 4.8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air 3 . Water ° 4. Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14. Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 City of Seattle King Count Norman B.Rice,Mayor Tim Hill,Executive Seattle-King County Department of Public Health David M. Lurie, Director PLANNING DIVISION Don Erickson, AICP CITY OF RENTON Zoning Administrator City of Renton SEP 0 81992 Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue Southri to Renton, WA 98055 RE: CU-126-89 Dear Mr Erickson: As an introduction, I have replaced Paul Murakami as District Administrator at the Health Department' s Southeast District Health Center. One of the tasks I inherited from Paul was the remodel of our facility to accommodate additional records storage within the footprint of our existing structure. A formal building permit application will be forthcoming later this year for the remodel. However, I wanted to make one last effort to re-visit the idea of placing a temporary modular structure on-site to serve as a staff meeting area. The Department had submitted a Conditional Use proposal in 1989-90 to the City of Renton that was denied. As we progress with the planning for the interior remodel of our building, it becomes increasingly apparent that the aesthetic appearance of the building is destroyed and adverse impacts to lighting, ventilation, and staff work environment will result. The original desire was to place the modular building along the west side of the existing building to provide a staff meeting/conference room area. Space inside the building now used for this purpose would have been converted to records storage. With the denial of the Conditional Use proposal, we have little choice but to proceed with the alternative, less acceptable proposal . With this somewhat long-winded introduction, I am requesting a meeting with you to discuss the issue. Lenora Blauman suggested that I write to you outlining my concerns. Primarily, I am interested in your opinion as to whether timing is now better to re-address the issue or whether city policy has changed which makes the climate better for another look at our proposal. B: \CONDIT.USE Southeast Public Health Center 3001 N.E.4th Street Renton,Washington 98056 (206)296-4700 FAX(206)296-0568 "Printed on Recycled Paper" You may also have some ideas of ways we could mitigate some of the aesthetic (albeit arbitrary) concerns expressed by the Hearing Examiner. Please call ne at 296-4700. I look forward to the opportunity to meet with you. My preference would be to invite you and Ms. Blauman to our office to hold the meeting. As they say, a picture is worth a lot of words. Sincerely, Larry Kir hner Distr t ministrator B:\CONDIT.USE April 16, 1990 _ Renton City Council Minutes Page 120 Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Tanner presented a report Development Committee concurring with the hearing examiner's decision to deny the conditional use Appeal: Seattle-King permit requested by the Seattle-King County Health Department (CU-126- County Health 89) to locate a 720 square foot temporary modular office building next to the Department Conditional existing health department building in a G-1 zone located at 3001 NE 4th Use Permit, CU-126-89 Street. Following a public meeting held on February 27, 1990, the hearing examiner rendered his decision on March 9, 1990. An appeal was filed on March 22, 1990. Because the Committee found no substantial error in fact or law in the decision of the hearing examiner, the Committee recommended affirmation of that decision. MOVED BY TANNER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPORT. CARRIED. Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented a report Committee concurring with the Parks Department staff approval and recommendation of King County: Open Space the Final Interlocal Cooperation Agreement submitted by King County Bond Issue Projects, establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Conservation Interlocal Agreement Futures open space projects and for the distribution by King County of the related funds. The Committee also recommended that the matter be referred to the Ways and Means Committee and the Mayor and City Clerk for execution. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Community Event: Community Services Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented a report Renton River Days recommending concurrence in the request to waive all permit fees for Renton Waiver River Days activities and in locating the ornamental River Days windsocks and banners on City light poles for approximately one month beginning July 7 through August 12, 1990. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY TANNER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT. CARRIED. H & HR: Block Grant Community Services Committee Chairman Zimmerman presented a report Fund Exchange with recommending Housing and Human Resources Block Grant funds exchange Mercer Island with Mercer Island (referred 4/9/90). The Community Services Committee met with H & HR staff to review the purchase of Mercer Island Community Development block grant funds with City of Renton general funds. The City of Mercer Island has $42,161.00 of block grant dollars that they are willing to exchange for $27,826.26 of Renton's general funds. Renton general fund dollars will be drawn in the amount of $25,983.54 from project C87775, North Highlands Neighborhood Center Renovation Phase II, and $1,842.72 from project C85777 Highlands Walkways Phase I. Mercer Island's block grant funds in the amount of $39,369.00 will be utilized for the renovation work at the North Highlands Neighborhood Center. There was a published citizen comment period on this proposed change from April 6, 1990 through April 11, 1990. No comments were received. Mercer Island's block grant funds in the amount of $2,792.00 will be used for the North Highlands Walkways Phase I. The Committee further recommended that the matter be referred to Ways and Means Committee for appropriate legislation. MOVED BY ZIMMERMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT.* Upon Council inquiry as to why this exchange is necessary, John Morris, Housing and Human Resources Coordinator, explained that because Mercer Island currently has excess funds in the Block Grant Program due to lack of designated projects and Renton has projects in the Highlands area that are eligible for these specific dollars, Renton's general fund dollars will be exchanged for Mercer Island's Block Grant monies. The exchange will allow the City of Renton additional improvements for renovation work at the North Highlands Neighborhood Center and North Highlands Walkways Phase I. Mr. Morris added that King County supports this arrangement for the utilization of these funds. *MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Keolker-Wheeler presented the Committee following ordinance for second and final reading: Ordinance #4266 An ordinance was read amending City Code concerning obtaining appraisals Vacation: Ordinance for street vacations and appraisal fees. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, Revision SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL. ALL AYES. CARRIED. 40, ''; CITY- OF RENTON NELL i4 44,tt Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor June 11, 1990 Ms. Barbara Hadley 110 Prefontaine P1, So., Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Appeal filed by Seattle-King County Health Department, Conditional Use Permit, CU-126-89 ' Dear Ms. Hadley: At its regular meeting of April 16, 1990, the Renton City Council adopted the recommendation of the Planning and Development Committee to affirm the recommendation rendered by the hearing examiner on 3/9/90 to deny the referenced conditional use permit. It was the finding of the committee that there was no substantial error in fact or law in the hearing examiner's decision. This letter was overlooked following the action taken by Council. My apologies that notification was not sent in a timely manner. Sincerely, lyn J. Petersen, CIVIC City Clerk 235-2502 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT April 16 , 1990 Seattle-King County Health Department Appeal, CU-126-89 (Referred 3/22/90 (date of appeal) ) The applicant, Seattle-King County Health Department, sought a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot temporary modular office building next to the existing health department building, in a G-1 zone. This property is located at 3001 N.E . 4th Street. The hearing examiner conducted a public hearing on February 27 , 1990 , and rendered his decision on March 9 , 1990 . The hearing examiner decided to deny the conditional use permit, the applicant appealed. • The Planning and Development Committee met on April 12 , 1990 to consider this appeal . The committee found that there was no substantial error in fact or law in the hearing examiner' s decision". Therefore, the committee recommends to the city council that the decision of the hearing examiner be affirmed. C:44-.,--,—..1 r, ,_J.,, sse Tanner, Chair . 6 i f"ti ``_,\.zy::\ \ U].'Y:,,4.-Y..` _1,. ,Y.\c} ,,.\ TE resa Zimmerman, Vice-Chair yi ,, 1. 1 (��t` r ',Cr7 . Kathy Kedlker-Wheeler, Member ZLF: as . CITY8 : 31 . , 'L�C° : A� JW • April 2. 1990 •enton City Council Minutes • Page 103 CONSENT AGENDA Items on the consent agenda are adopted by one motion which follows the listing: Latecomer Agreement: City Clerk/Finance submitted supplemental request, latecomer agreement, Windsor Place Associates, Windsor Place Apartments, 4415 NE 5th Avenue, to add sanitary sewer to Bremerton Avenue NE original request for storm and water systems and street lighting (2/5/90). Refer to Utilities Committee. Finance: City Code City Clerk/Finance requested revision of Fee Schedule, Title V, Chapter 1, Revision, Fee Schedule concerning cost of City Code, Code supplements, and facsimile copies. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Claim: Lankester, - CL Claim for damages in the amount of $500,000 filed by Keith Lankester, 16-90 12215 SE 88th Place, Renton, for injuries, mental distress, and loss of income allegedly caused by negligence of Building and Police Department staff in regards to issuance of violation (3/29/88)(CL_16-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Lankester, - CL Claim for damages in the amount of $100,000 filed by Janet Lankester, 12215 17-90 SE 88th Place, Renton, for mental anguish, loss of consortium, and loss of support, allegedly caused as a result of husband's (Keith Lankester) arrest (3/29/88)(CL 17-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Claim: Lankester, - CL Claim for damages in the amount of $100,000, filed by Curt Lankester, 12215 18-90 SE 88th Place, Renton, for mental distress, allegedly caused as result of the arrest of his father (Keith Lankester) (3/29/88)(CL 18-90). Refer to City Attorney and insurance service. Appeal_Seattle-King Appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by Barbara Hadley, 110 ountXr- _ea_tt� Prefontaine P1. South, Suite 500, Seattle, representing Seattle-King County Department, CU-126-89 Health Department, Conditional Use Permit for temporary modular office unit, CU-126-89, located at 3001 NE Fourth Street, Renton. Refer to Planning and Development Committee. CAG: 90-024, CTS Transportation Division/Public Works requested acceptance of contract with Engineers, HOV CTS Engineers for feasibility study of "High Occupancy Vehicle" Improvements on North improvements on North Park Drive near I-405; approval of letter of Park Drive/I-405 agreement with Metro Transit, and approvaLof interlocal agreement with WSDOT. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Public Works: Kohl City Clerk/Finance submitted request from Kohl Excavating, Inc. for Excavating, Inc., reimbursement of costs for waterline oversizing,Kohl Park Addition, Empire Waterline Oversizing Way South and Oakesdale Avenue SW, in the amount of $9,500.00. Refer to Reimbursement, Rainier Utilities Committee. Avenue North (#W-549) MOVED BY NELSON, SECONDED BY EDWARDS, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE Correspondence was read from Albert E. Arrington, 2nd Vice President, Audience Comment: South King County Chapter National Council of Senior Citizens (NCSC), Arrington - North Access 7027 South 131st Street, Seattle, stating opposition to the closure of the north to Coulon Park entrance to Gene Coulon Park. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY ZIMMERMAN, COUNCIL-REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PARK BOARD FOR RECOMMENDATION TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE.* Councilman Stredicke questioned the date that the City acquired and opened the north access to the park and at what point is the Council and Park Board closing that access. Mathews answered that Mt. View Drive is the access and is a public street which dead-ends at the north terminus of the park. Brent McFall stated that staff has not made any proposals to close off the access to Coulon Park. Also, residents of that area have expressed concerns which are currently being investigated by the Park Department and will be reported to staff. A petition has been received regarding this issue and will be presented at the next Council meeting. *CARRIED. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: 7,f, SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 4/2/90 Dept/Div/Board.. City Clerk/Finance Staff Contact.. Maxine Motor AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Public Hearing.. Decision; Seattle-King County Department Correspondence.. of Public Health, Conditional Use Permit Ordinance for temporary modular office unit, CU-126-89 Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: A. City Clerk's Letter New Business.... B. Letter of Appeal Study Session... C. Hearing Examiner's Report, Other dated March 9, 1990 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning APPROVALS: and Development Committee Legal Dept Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal filed by Barbara Hadley, representing Seattle-King County Health Department, accompanied by required fee received on March 23, 1990. ' k CITY )F RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor March 26, 1990 APPEAL FILED BY BARBARA.HADLEY, REPRESENTING SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision, dated March 9, 1990, regarding conditional use permit for temporary modular office unit, CU-126-89 To parties of record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the referenced matter has been filed with the city clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee, and the recommendation of the Committee will be considered by the City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The council secretary will notify all parties of record either by mail or telephone of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to be notified of the meeting, please call the council secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, yn J. Petersen, CMC Deputy City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. CU-126-89CITY OrRENT®N Seattle-King County Health Department MAR 2 3 1990 RECE WED The-undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal. fla §igTtlri or Recommendation of the Land Use. Hearing Examiner, dated March 9, 19 90 . 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Name: .Seattle-King County Health Dept. Name: Barbara Hadley Address: ' 3001 N.E. 4th Address: 110 Prefontaine P1 . So. , Suite 500 Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone No. 296-4700 Telephone No. 296-4668 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) . Set forth below are 'the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted in the Examiner's Report) • No. 16 Error: ": . .new permanent facility's location and design are not finalized" Correction: Property for the new permanent site has been purchased on Talbot Road, directly south of Valley Medical Center and design. plans have been initiated. CONCLUSIONS: No. 3 Error: "With rare exception these buildings are ugly. " Correction: We do not disagree that these units generally have limited aesthetic value. We have presented landscaping plans revised at the suggestion of the City's landscape specialist to moderate the impact. In addition, our specifications for the unit indicated wood exterior in an effort to mini- OTHER: . mize the contrast between the unit and other buildings in the area. No. 14 ' .Error: " . . .timing of new construction is not set and neither is the location." As stated in correction to Findings of Fact No.. 16, land Correction: has been purchased for the new permanent facility and design documents are currently being developed. The Health Department is willing to abide by the 2 year limitation of a conditional use permit and would be willing to do so in writing if so requested. 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: Grant conditional use permit. Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: b9-144-4-•a-AfaA Vaghe; Appellant/Representativ ignature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse ,side of page) for specific appeal procedures. 1 • WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. CU-126-89 Seattle-King County Health Department • The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated March 9, 1990 . 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Name: Seattle-King County Health Dept. Name: . Barbara Hadley Address: 3001 N.E. 4th Address: 110 Prefontaine P1 . So. , Suite 500 Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone No. 296-4700 Telephone No. 296-4668 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted • in the Examiner's Report) • No. Error: Correction: • CONCLUSIONS: No. 15 Error: "In the interim maybe the Health Department can work with RVTI . . . .to arrange for conference space." Correction: Alternative sites for conference space have been surveyed including RVTI. No satisfactory sites have been found that are avail- able on flexible schedules or large enough to accommodate the regular meeting schedules of the clinic. OTHER: No. ' Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: Grant conditional use permit. • Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: • &li'10_,..(t./(Iv/ 4 .9/76 Appellant/Representative i nature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. • V. March 9, 1990 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT File No: CU-126-89 LOCATION: 3001 N.E. Fourth Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit to site a 720 square foot modular office building next to the existing Health Department building, in a G-1 zone. This building is intended to be a temporary structure. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on February 20, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on February 27, 1990 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Exhibit #4 - Elevation Map Exhibit #5 - Landscape Plan The staff report for this proposal was reviewed by Senior Planner, LENORA BLAUMAN who noted the site is currently zoned for general use but is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as public use. Currently there is a King County health facility on the site. This modular building will be used for such events as staff meetings and conferences. The site is over four acres in size with access off N.E. 4th. Even though this site is located in the Heather Downs Moratorium district utilities are available because there is no sewer or plumbing required for the proposed building, only meeting rooms. Ms. Blauman said the ERC evaluated this proposal and issued a Determination of Non-Significance with the conditions that the applicant provide a landscape plan to address aesthetic impacts, as well as a construction plan which addresses erosion control, hours of work during construction, hauling routes, watering down of the site during construction and a cash bond to ensure street clean-up. The plans required by the ERC will be reviewed by staff and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Continuing, Blauman reviewed the criteria to be considered for a conditional use request stating the facility is located in the aquifer protection area but presents no problem because no plumbing will be contained in the building; staff feels there is a community need, and there will be no over- concentration of this type of use as there are no other services of this nature offered in the community. This proposed unit is considered to be compatible with the current complex and also the surrounding neighborhood. When asked if this request may open the door to other temporary structures being permitted throughout the city Blauman stated this particular structure is slated to remain on the site no longer than two years and will be screened with landscaping. She said this is a small structure and will be compatible with the present building. There will be a distance of forty feet between the new Seattle-King County ] ,<.th Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page 2 structure and the existing building due to fire code requirements; the proposed development will displace ten or more parking spaces but will not present a problem because excess parking is available at the site; there will be no concerns regarding light or glare. In conclusion, Planner Blauman noted staff recommends the Hearing Examiner approve this request conditioned upon the applicant revising the plan to show a minimum of forty feet between the proposed modular unit and the main complex. Staff also recommends this conditional use permit be limited to a period of two years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, and that a cash bond in the amount of $5,000. be required to ensure the use will be discontinued and the building removed at the end of the recommended two year period. Responding for the applicant was BARBARA HADLEY, Administrative Assistant, 110 Prefontaine Place So., Suite 500, Seattle 98104. Ms. Hadley advised it is intended that the Renton Health Center facilities are to be relocated to property in Auburn, or near the Valley Medical Center in Renton. In the meantime it is felt the Health Department could better serve their current clientele more efficiently if they had more examination rooms within the current facilities. It is the desire of the applicant to use their current meeting rooms for additional exam space and move their meetings to the proposed unit. It is the plan to relocate to the new property within the next two years. Ms. Hadley said it is unknown at this time what the current site will be used for by the County after the health center is moved in the next two years. She said there are other county properties near this facility that may expand and become located on the current site. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:35 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, the Seattle-King County Health Department, filed a request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the erection of a temporary modular building on the Health Department Campus. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. The site is on the south side of N.E. 4th, across from RVTI, and located between Edmonds Avenue N.E. and Monroe Avenue N.E. The site is located just east of the crest of the hill where N.E. 3rd merges with N.E. 4th as it enters the Highlands. 6. The subject site was originally annexed to the city by the adoption of Ordinance 2249, enacted in June, 1966., 7. The subject site is zoned General (Single Family; Lot size - 35,000 sq. ft.), a classification it • received upon annexation. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The applicant proposes erecting a one-story modular building to the west of the existing health complex. The building would be 60 feet long by 12 feet wide. The structure would be oriented in a north/south fashion. 10. The new building would be used for conference rooms. Existing conference facilities would be converted to additional examining rooms. This modification is expected to reduce the waiting time at the clinic, but not increase patient visits or handling capacity. 11. The new building is not anticipated to generate additional traffic. This is related to the fact that patient load should not change. • • Seattle-King County lth Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page 3 12. The applicant proposes some perimeter landscaping along N.E. 3rd and 4th. Additional plantings around the structure including 6 larger trees 8 to 10 feet tall to be located along the west facade of the structure. Smaller shrubs would encircle the building. 13. Fire and Building Code regulations required the relocation of the building 40 feet from the main building. This location makes the building stand out more prominently from its surroundings. 14. Staff reports that,the site is served by sufficient parking for the existing use and proposed use. 15. The building is located in the sewer moratorium area, and is also located over the city's aquifer. The building will not be plumbed. 16. The applicant testified that the new permanent facility's location and design are not finalized. It also could not be ascertained if the current site would be vacated within the two years established by the ERC. Such decisions are within the scope of the Health Department's governing body. Similarly, reuse of the existing site remains undetermined. CONCLUSIONS . 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C) which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. The requested conditional use is denied. As a preliminary matter, the point must be made that the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit is discretionary and that the applicant is not entitled to use the property as requested as of right. 2. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the site for suitable public uses. The Seattle-King County Health Department complex no doubt fits that guideline. The proposed modular building violates the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and the city's vision statement by introducing a disparate, visually bland, if not unattractive building, in a prominent location. The Districts Objective of the Comprehensive Plan suggests projecting a favorable image and that new uses be designed to be compatible with existing uses. As a matter of fact, this provision of the Comprehensive Plan has been codified in Section 4-31-4(B)(3)(d) which states: d. Public and quasi-public buildings essential to the physical and economic welfare of an area, such as fire stations, electrical substations, telephone exchanges and community and regional parks. Buildings shall conform to and harmonize with the surrounding buildings as to the type of architecture, setback and landscaping. 3. The modular building proposed by the applicant does not satisfy these requirements. Its architectural style is barracks-like. It is a 60 foot long 12 foot wide building. With rare exception these buildings are ugly. 4. While there may be a community need for the proposed expansion, the form and location it takes cannot be divorced from the need. The location proposed by the proponent is quite prominent. As one enters the Highlands area of the city the site cannot be overlooked. It will be located on a sweeping open space just as one crests the hill. • Seattle-King County B h Department CU-126-89 • March 9, 1990 Page 4 5. After considering previous decisions regarding both temporary permits and conditional use permits to allow modular buildings, and being cognizant of City Council concerns regarding the less than aesthetic nature of such buildings, this office believes that approving the permit would just be extending an inappropriate precedent and rewarding poor planning. 6. The issue of aesthetics applicable to this type of structure was first addressed in 1987 in File Number CU-028-87, wherein it was stated: "3. The need for the use in this location. to serve a community need is questionable. The main concern raised by the request is the establishment of an interim use in a temporary building. The metal siding and modular structure will not add to the aesthetic character of the area, although the landscaping will assist in softening the facade and attracting attention away from the facade. 4. Careful examination of the establishment of temporary office buildings should [occur] in the future. As indicated, they are generally not characterized by aesthetic features and do very little to upgrade the image of the City. Also, while the ERC imposed a time limitation - three to five years is not necessarily short term - pressure could mount to maintain it beyond that period, condition or not. In a thriving business atmosphere the pressure for continued occupancy could be hard to resist once the building is in place. The City would be placed in an awkward position, if this or any applicant wanted to maintain such a structure beyond its established time frame. One does not lightly, even considering the ERC's applicable conditions, ask a private party to remove any existing structure. Be that as it may, it would appear that the use in this case is reasonable since a reasonable landscaping effort has been mounted. And, hopefully the use will prove to be temporary as now proposed. 12. In conclusion, future analysis by staff should review the potential precedent of establishing temporary facilities to allow expansion, and further investigate the potential problems for removing such uses once established. One can't help but believe that the applicant was, or should have been, well aware of their expansion needs prior to this time and arrived at a more permanent aesthetic solution." 7. Nothing has changed since that decision was issued, at least in terms of, analysis. Although since that time this office has become aware that criticism of such uses did come from some quarters, including members of the City Council, demonstrating that study of the issue probably was, and still is merited. In addition, this office would prefer policy direction on this matter from the Council since the Council did not appear to wholeheartedly accept the city's own temporary addition. Since it is not clear how the Council reacts to such buildings, an advisory opinion seems prudent. That can best be achieved by forcing an appeal in the instant case by denying the request and permitting the City Council to review the issue. 8. While each use should obviously be considered on its merits, the financial wherewithal of some entities could make such modular units permanent additions to the streetscape, and if site plan review is to carry any weight, (where staff does attempt to meld new uses into the existing streetscape), the issue of aesthetics, (even for worthy uses), cannot be totally ignored. Therefore, further policy direction from the City Council is necessary. Such direction would assist both the Planning staff and the Examiner to determine whether such uses are in the best interests of the city and its citizens. 9. A•primary issue is what type of precedent is created by approving these modular buildings. Obviously approving this proposal will perpetuate similar requests. While that may make sense to the proponents of'such projects for economic reasons, or to solve supposed short terms space needs, that does not help the city redevelop its image. 10. We see similar space needs constraints in King County's temporary jail complex. A complex that may not be so "temporary" after all. Once the precedent has been established it will be difficult to resist future requests for more, simply put, ugly modular units - which are no less practical than other structures. Denying this request will cause consternation, but it may result in better long range planning or more aesthetically designed temporary buildings. 11. On appeal, a resulting decision by the City Council should result in a clear consensus regarding the appropriateness of such buildings in the city's streetscape. • Seattle-King County r Eth Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page 5 12. It is obvious from the way the new community facility, the main fire station, and the senior citizen center structures turned out that there is a serious concern regarding architectural appearance. These structures all exhibit obvious aesthetic consideration. 13. Similarly, planning staff constantly argues for upgrades in landscaping, exterior treatment, form and architectural style and context in private projects, and approving structures as that now proposed would detract from those efforts. 14. Finally, the representative from the Health Department stated that the timing of new construction for the replacement facility is not set and neither is the location. They have done some prototype design work and the new facility may be in Auburn as suggested or it may be near the Valley Medical Campus. This harkens back to the concern expressed in the above quoted decision regarding "temporary" versus "permanent." As noted above, it would be. difficult to force the applicant to remove a building that is already on campus, if difficulties or change in plans occurred in the new siting. 15. This office reluctantly must deny the request. It is not appropriate in the proposed location and creates an unacceptable precedent to solving short term space needs. In the interim maybe the Health Department can work with RVTI, which is located just across the street, to arrange for conference space. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit for a temporary modular building is denied. ORDERED THIS 9th day of March, 1990. FRED J. K FMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of March, 1990 to the parties of record: Barbara Hadley 110 Prefontaine South, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of March, 1990 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director Traffic Engineer•Division Brent McFall, Administrative Assistant Kim Scattarella, Engineering Specialist Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be,filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. March 23, 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. Seattle-King County Hi_ .., i Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page6 All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • / J1 "/";''' �4`. ii' 1. �.' 4)C 1t 1 — !}'! 4U1+I ` rh -Y^. • io „'7 1 i - l' 1 ..cl.l r 6 a{i, ttdi ��' 0 t F .� e az h 5 = �. 11-11113Trib,. o ,.►, rol I' . "GIs 5 I tome*_ '�� .e :�y ..•.E y.,.5t _ ••I. •L1RII1 • ~ • ;� l �� -J �L " 7 •' .fir Jr. '.. jo p•'--O _ f 1 4,14j..� --'f' a ii use.•�are. '..', g c:—i. )' .•� • o 29 • • • �� =s ;; ;.; F c. .S ,. ; • ' •••`.0.•.4 .3 •'••• J E \ '.�.Fp�J`t3 33 °' •'75 �'i v 4.1 1,\ I 1 // •' �� 6 �r (4 9 57r8 54 60 — L:_ t'' ) • I 5 oti t • 8b6 B1I ! oI9' p\ 50 5.7 t6 5 r C' ' �I 1 �� HILLS • ffCI' � sa 69 W JOCAZJ�jPlfai ' ' I • ZK "1 /I8.r•R..1P97Fi777E 's74.'3 •2 6' 70 T. r- �CHUOL ' I - - 4 13 � I�i ... Pl F G 3 is �_4 G- 1 -. ,, / f GPE ENWDOD __-1 • • / • r N �0.0 L_ 1 , , • /6 � y C D I' / , //i - - I. /�._ / / I \ / / • . 1it �i 1 //P/ I \ //n,/ I i11 I // �f/' 1 I / / 1 / / ,1 11 /c)/ • . — 1 / / I I. I / // I 1 I I 11 11 // f. ��i/ I I 1 fz_li .- • • • • APPLICANT Seattle-King Co . Health Dept . TOTAL AREA 4. 89 acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E . Fourth Street ' EXISTING ZONING G-1 , General • EXISTING USE Public Health Center PROPOSED USE Temporary modular office building COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS ' Located at3001 N.E . Fourth Street . :,1:1:2)\ f;•"4.;'''..;!....'...:vi.,...:•:,:c ., ,..:..,.. •,,;.:t..... (.-, ..es. "'•-•>;NA,,,,,„. ....;f'-' ':•••':.:::ff, ..;". .:'::i.:;...•-•:' ,',q.•:.e.:•;;,..,".: i.L._,,.,. v..i.;••••-• ,•:.;:•';•: ,;....,..• •,..,:f.:;:tf.:••.;e,::e:.,,e';',;'_.:..•'•,?_:::;I::::`.....4:,`,:`•; . ***`''!,:!:'.,/,:'•: *7•:.7::••::.'•:•'':'•,;,....`'`::''.;;sy:,;'•7`4.1....?;;,-..;;.::,,,''`'.:.•••••• --c' * '-,`,......',"'"..;;;•,:c,1:': ::*'??.';:::7---''''' ., :*;7;1:`,.. "•-•,• •?::."i-f:c{,..::•'.. ..-.:1=,: Scale 15 5 = 20005 1‘.-.. '-:r'2,,i‘7.:?, ;.M:_..t.,:s.'..c.;.:.,,. .. '-0.!!.::L,=''...^.--::j---!'-'_.,,.3.,.::',"i..:c"-,;:-:;:..:::•::-:.c;-.''i:: . • . ihkt '''.c`;.-".:,..,•'--: "`' ,:cc.:>.'",: s.••:". :::....;:tj......,::(•,....-2.'....." .;:i....;•.. .. V'.-'...'es • • . -..7,.....-••• .• -..• .'''•:•;".•.-:',3'1-5,-.. .• - ,,-1,r.,•- ; -;- - .-... .-Ar •• •--. - ..‘-.;'..1•,,,•..,...:..„-'Il• ?.NE 11 A 'Ec'.='...::::.- ,.:.:0' 1::•. - ',:::, .:-... f•Kr•••.;1 Poc'oc'oc'ocOO`Do°0°00.,_ _s_ ,,.-, ..... .. its . ...00000 1 ii i ......,.. .,..r.; . .. 1_._, .. ... •,\•,...,..„....„,„ AIIIIIII :.:.•.: • -..I.:,::.::::,..,,,.--, mil -,,1-••,'79 ......:.:.:.:" ,, ,..I/111•11 b IIII.I. ::•:.:.:.:t:...„..:,:„.„......:.:. ',.1• •e c:.• 011ii...-1:':••.;''.C. • n. •:•:+.:+,... ., ',.(<• 1.., /0• :•:5•.•:••••.c.,,;•• f& „..t.•°°°•°:1*-9.,:::.::.:::.::;'4 .;,1:::.6.-.,!1:,t....:,.. ! j':•13, ;S...:.•,-...,. 1-1 .-• '-1.-j -.•.., c.-.2.•,.'-' Zt vomit tptijkillik \;,... .,.. .---A .-41•0#0,_,6 ... - • -...--,,Nlions .:*?.iigi ;me ,-,-.7,-,--,77 •,:' .tr•k!".!*•S . g: iiir '.....,... ':. . dist :..,,i ..,• 0111 „.. .:.:•:.:•:•,.:.:...,.....1 • . 4.,. . ......, .i...,, ., :„., :,,,,R •000.• 1,00.00r figanso• El Ill :-... 11:"Doc'0°.0°06°., J II Jata ggil II '7::::. rms.1/4 Ediammr.,51::..- .00. ...... . ,............, - --••........•::::::,•.:.., ._ , - ::: •.::i:i,i,:, ::; _09....000..„9.. ,....„ __ .,. L'.,..::•ii .•:...ai.:15.:.::: -.... , '1/4? -,.. i,,i,i,,,,, ip,„...,..., ,:.• ‘ •• ••••.... ,,.........0 s .., .. ,.......00.„00. ,,:„.._ 0.000.00.0.0. ..0.00000000* p. ,.. ::.,:iiii::::•:•:•.....rannii•-•:••- '•::*:::•:::::.* manurAwg,, II MI k •00000• 000000 ° 1".0 •i*:.:::::FAA: •I I .. ::.:•,,,,_•• ,...---41,t,..,-..„21 14inici. 11.11IIR l• , t•.?-"-t• •-••'...1•3'0`., 11 • ..c • A%,; ::::iN r..-;; .11..li r .iiinyealirla ,:',-;• D • % :iiiiiiii:: ..::::::•:•••" :... .:.::.:.:.... AEI.. a IIIIIIIa : 1 L-----J . 0 0 o 0• • • 1• 'C. . "•'..0100111 11 ...o0 • • • .i,' ::::: :i.•..i::.". 1.11111111: o o• • • • • •11. ::::::::::::: 1 IN 1 Ap OHL ._._ _• . -rkir.,z,-: ,),).• .., ,.._, .. • . ., , ::,:,,,,,:, •...• .r.: V:a • a ,..•, :Arm 7.7r-8-, .....`430.501 111.-.frz.iti F00.00.000..0.0., ,>. • • •• • •• ,,, - „,,,,• 1,4;,;, -00.-.Pred41 . ...1 .11 • • .•:::::::::::::::::.::.. :, •.•.• . .\ oftlf 'ir•-•• .°00...iii,SW?g. ' ••• . .%%re c0 ‘,- • •: • ......, , •• • • • • • • • ,5,3 . . i '111.14111111 .::::::::;::;::::::;:.::::::...;:•:: : ::::p.....::::::„..... .--::::::::::' .•:-..:*:.•zig:iiii::::ii:.0.::miii.:ii:i:...... • • 4 • -;,... . . N, A .• •MIN ... ••••••••• -.,.;,.., \\K 161111 11. . 1111.111114 oak ..,-: I 1 •••• 41 • • '11 °' .1" 'L. • • • ,• !•40 fill .o• •• 1011,11MIN11,110•_111 ,..)11_1.\0•*ie.. .•-.4,•7 jo, A •- Nir ...0....00. ::::::.:,:,,,:::„„„„„„„„„,:,, ....,..,..„.. .0.0. „„:„„„, .....„,........ " -.:7.•........' :i:i:.c.:; :'..:; 1.-imin2101 .1111E..‘"-..iii,. r-- ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:... smt•,!.;?) •'sa --- miii•••••••••• •••••••.•‘•••••••[.. .::::::: r., .4-''''''''.777777:7:7::-.7... -1'.Iiiilli °0°- 1.111.912MOSE ::iiii.:ii::.:!:Fr-7.-.......::::i:iiii.ii...siiii.....0.1.1 1, ::vo:•. A„, I „i„,,„,....,,, ,::,:::::::::::„:„:„„„„„„:„.. .... ..0.000-.0.0.„-oo ...00000.00,0.0...0.0.0„0: !.... zivura :,,,,,,,,.::::::„.„,„„„„,„,,„„„„„„:„ a ...... mar . ..k::::...:•:•::,.. . ::.:........:•:::•:.:•:.• ......:•:::: .0. 0-0...°.00.000 0 ..............:.::::. . ‘,..,.. .:.,..:.:.:...:i......,.,i,:.:..i.:..i.....,.:.:..... ) •....,::::::: ... . •• ..:.;.:.:.;.:.:.:..0 0.02 . .• •000000%0ov :::::::::::„:„. . • la, inlv aiii• igtob AVM :.' •::::::::'•'• ...:::::::::::::::::::::- .,. ...o 0 0 0 oco000 0 0. .................:.....::::.:.......7........:.::::a:M:::::•::::. i: •:.1:•:•i::Wi *.• sopoeffaV.0.' . ...• 4::i&cVM :1' ••••• ..:.:*:::::::::::::::::•:::: .0 0 .. . :::::::::.*:.:•::-:.1 •••:•:;•&•-:•.:•:.:•:•:•:.:•:••••••••• : p 1057.K., 44; <-.. ...:::::::: : : ::i:: .0000.0%00%7 ie 0 0..0•..0.00.00.0.0.• :::::::. ...00. .. . , - .0 0 0••41 .:::...:. 0.• ..,-...,. , •:: IM? A an• bm......::___......:,-;;;.'.%''''''..:::::•'.....:L.,...1.ii:i.:::.!!:.!.:!!!!..i::!::.i.:!:::::::::i.:::: .°1,0°,5:7,00:00°000°000°,00:0°0:•°0:°00:00.0 0 o 7..,1.c.........:.:..........: . :."..13....rripin •:Tikolniew•C.- :::::::::::::::••••:::::•:':':':•:*:•: .o 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0.0000.oo...0. N......:..:.:....... : I II,. ' •..0.0°0 . ':•::•;:i1:.1:1•::::::::::i:i*i:::•: ..°0 o 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o____ op.ill..:::::............. ‘'2,:e. ,.:.t • . :-..<„. 11! , .o.00o0o,, i..,.• .0000o00.000.0.000.00._00 0 o,.,. 0 0000000 o o• 1 ,.:::•:,.:::...:.:.:.,.:.,.. 1 "• ' r ••°"-`'° ,i-;• :i':':iii:i:iiiiiii:.iii: ".' °§6`60000.0• , •:•.-. . L.,•., .000.0.00• .;.3,•,_ ..:::••••• :....:::: .. ,. , .. "'e : .::•:.:•:•::::::::::::....:•:. .• • • .000c,c,.. . ................ _ _ : 3 h. '''' :1i:i:::•:::::::::::::::::::• .1:8,--...`,9 '••°°• ...,:ir, •:•:-...::::::.:....:.:.: '..4101'.',....4e ':• (73(2)A iNf44 6 :•:::::::::::::::::::::::: ..•.:- , ..,..,.;3. ,, .,,..!. . :.,....:......:.:.:,,.:. 40 . ,. 41114111 SOO. '•0000•000 0000.0,,00.• '---- ) I /\ ... ,sk ti-'. **.; •::•:•:•:•:•:•:•::::::::.: .<3 ced•c,),Q,.,5-1,:,c. •,•.-...,0• ...:....:.:•:•..,•.•.:.: -.•• --.• ill1111 " .?‘. v :ft't '. i:i5.**i*:::::::: ., .9,!sie;',,t'•6.r.'a.f,'f'c;1;67.,;_l•-j) :::.:-:•:•::::::::::.:. •••... .,., :... 411111:jk•';„ :',H, . . ,; .•••,:...12",...-:,';'••,•-3';-•:. ,'',0••:;;9..•• '.e.,•'.•. .::::::::::::::::::::::: '16',.:.::,;7..-'.e;•...'.5 t.i21;•,I,:: r'.;:•./....IT•:;:e!.7.3.'C...j.?'''•Y..;'.5...'ilj9.:' ;..'.0•')e:''',' :::.:::::::..:::.::::::•::.:NO ...1,1::::,. .,8 l'.3.: ..• :3['''. '.I'‘:.,'') ' . '6,,,... ..tt‘, . ''''rj.IYZ:(.; ,;52 gif..,.:;I)..,7.1. •,.5.1.4.:,•8),C;1.',1:iJ'f:;!.C...r.;::', r;;;.,(27!%:0".''..,./. .•:.::::::.::::::::: ., ...C, •' k ‘•'••:‘l'A..:.'''.11.:''......'''':' ;i':'.‘ •kr...4.-:-',,:,.• .6 ',6?••=:,-.?,....-2,":','P,'?,''',,Fs,•••::,..,v':5•5•,-;%.10:,,i,,-...,,,a.....-..-... ris.:124„,.:./..,•,.. , c,,.6. on _ •.-,„.„••,. •••:vc:?..,-,4i:. ..y.;•.; .....-<•.../).,.;'•,72.1,:••-;•;!..,•?3•, c,;?,.f.y,:•••,;.:••,,,,v1. ..,:c.e., %,. , . ...,..,-...,,,..,:.,',?,..,;,,..",2•-- - 0,6%,'''y '\s-'''''''YKS.-..,.. 1:1Ellk .'''.121‘;./ .• '--. ---- ‘'C.;:'4:•C' Z'',1' ',.,.:*::-.4--: - - . ."tirl 11.11:/...' '.i's ' .4W4Wiii# ''''''''6::.1 t:f:c*ri.;37::::: ."..-c'::,',..';' ,-; ,•i;,•-•...- ',-,z,w••_,,,v1- : ,,.,-.t4: •,•:•?. ,.-,b4-:,'c....,...;<1.:',:-..::-,-',:„.-1.,,,,i.:., ,. , 'LT: ,,-).:YIK.):::?•••:-.c. •NI,, %44114:;,..,.,v.•••,:c-,c,:.:.,,,.•ci..;.,,..;..c,:...,,:•,-•,:. ' I • A,.-•-:::,:-r,•:7•;,,,,?, -, y,•••.,..1,1:,1,,,;•.,,'6•••••-, -• ,, •.,•t r!:.•/••••01'. '•c ' Ac, ''S:.';;'1.1i,1"?,''‘?;).'1.''..:"IP)`1.1"„•': ...1e0,-'i'.. T••,...,.0.'"1,., • ,„..\ 7.....1. 4111,. ;.•-;CS,-.--•.•,'C.''' • fc.'6.•. ‘• ••••, . .a. •cr.,., 6. -6 ip.7i.90:,.;1..'ii.:ZfiT> I:,•,i.,",.. .',.N.(1 ';..•0'i, .‘.•••••et)•:!, ...f.,..-,- - -. ..(7...:..r ,•17; .•.c•=0:::•,„r-,..4-..45:„. ..•Sir.,•<;11.i ..t.0.-ce;c c•>51,;:te:(s..m:,e.g.;-,,,,,... .6.- ,...:, ,,,,,,, ,,,,..;z,?..,,..?:,--![,:f.i.,:;:,,,,-,;!•,;.,:.q.!.< o'r.,,,,o....›0-P.,,•,.....- ., ._. .-..'y.:,:j•:.• -• . •:(:.0 00.0000.000.: /'7-,;:,:',Cr:•••‘,..ri'''';''.1..f,I •c;:cr-'r. .• •.2 0 .'*2' ''''''f".:`?'Cl'•'''. •••6:13••'*?tc:::*';;••t!';:;.'e.'C',f';:";<?:'t•S'il ''''F'-•75 :.s• •-•--:----,-, 2.N ^C.&i.4...6,re)\S;AVV....{.1'47.,r,...t'C'ric,!,•••:**-64.:.:*(•?..t...,* •",•.•••:.,".•,`... . -,•?.;..,.* ,:.`.e'S'1,-Co .,:::,,..:-...'?,•"..-:.,f, .....p.:.•.000:: I 1"t1...','";,Y-',.1 c\-'t)c,-1 ...;0,4. •„,.,.„Vt1 • ‹,' ..'t's '`.., . ,--el'f';' ,....,-"... 1.'ilr,e1.e.,,.. :•I,. ,„3 ;!-_,?., . 0 i.,,,..,,,f.,•2.3;•.)... . , •-,.....,z,,.;. .,, ;..`.5,. 4"1...-' 3..`q;!"....; .1.`>4. ,.43.'''...`'e:0`.. .i';'se'•'' * )',...P!,..s:• k v•. ..•r..;,.X•C'E,e4:','.-r .i _ ,' V.-.... :-.,*0••;r;•-,'-• ,?.-.••:f•'••"..2.-.,'•.:':".V:?,•':',',.",'.1`3,:''0`::'',`e,,, . -,...,,, e-:, J. a 0 _„ , ., , ‘-'3: .1:1,.',.',2•••-e-e7,...e4,.;:2••,k,`.•,•:, ...,,,:''•-• .,,,, ...:.•, r;E•Ars 0.. ----."•••,>' '.,,,R•r ,,,,..... 0.....,i-.c,•,,,L, •,`O c, . „ . ti••9.,„ii •• • '1!)1••••,•:,.0...,' - "4 274• • • ':'t'7,..'t• '0' . '•-c r•'V .. , i-..f.",..-, . .--- _ ..;n , •.• ' e'•elY ,• 1,:t':c•'44.; i,,'.'.:?-;<:<;,(y.,P•'°'`,.?,%..4.?Ii/'' '..°:•Cif6°• :•....1' ;• , •P....c ....1.1."1..:•:),....i. )... ---------------•-•..r'.r.'c',..i.,••' •• _ . /:••.:0 r)'...r•lc•-•••.;•;-'f;••••,p,- ••-..-%c:.:".,'•••!...ir - : ' ...,.••:„.,•:•!?,4 •,. . :-.4:"1,0 .."."..;`:•3•-`•".,(,,,,R;',./1 v9.,k;I:c, ,,,,\o'a,',c.c,r,;Alt .410A , •••=-:•".:EL• ,.;', .....',':.•'...) "f.•:;f•.`e:' ' 1:S_ ''&.,..'",:is,;.• :'.7 .,"_';'(•':3 .‘!,S,i'l:::'"g." 0 .)0 'q '''' :' .:. "!....:-'' ''2:'.C.'' .q.:': % • All.WA A.". . '- • .: . . . . .,.r.„e,,.....,,z3r„..,•• . •iie> 0000%0000 0 •.f.,1•.,-• . :::ii:•iiiiim: 0 •••••• ':'''''''. ` *V•:•:: LAND USE ELEMENT .•,..,,... 00 -3,•,, 00.0 .. „:..,. ;:.,•,;„.,.c.., .00 ::) i ,_...„, •...... . '2. .'.:.',...:'1, ,..--...e; fl,;•,"- .0 :4.• ••,-..,..,-,.,,.;„.,,,,),,,,,.. .,•...4 .0,-,,,,.. .,., .:,u-;, . • • A ..00..% uc,..0-.• . ..!, • . ..00 _0; ,0.000.• 1 I Single Family Commercial c,-...,. i le464.4k :•. 4•,,-..,••\t,.rk•7-tV-•'i 6_ 1 ".•", , -.t.,.,(-.,1 :•::::::::::::::::::,: 1....ow Density „ 47. Al .. , I ii:].• :::]:i::i-., •.• .:•:.:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:.. Multi-Family :\ Office / Office Park •00000000000 imp • D0000000 0000000 - '2.,;.,,, 1 ! . -. Eii.aiiMi Medium. Density .0000.0, )000000 ii •0000.0•, „.... . , 00c,c,c,c, 0. 000c. Public/ Quasi-Public ..c,„,00.• ••••••••••••••............... D0000000 •00.00.•- ,....,,,, . •.,),..... ..o_00000.1111 1 V..10,0 High Density o..mfots. Light Industrial 1 , gogow..1 Multi-Family r44•••,. ‘ o•, i ......4.4:•.•44.:::, 4,: 2-4-4-4-4-2-111 • 42, • . •••••• . 11 ;?1,:.-1.., I ra •'.b ••.)-60• 'I> '.'-''',- •-•••(:;,f;;':'i•J:1 . • • • %. . :' :: iniii111111 xr5,,,o;cfr •'). e,4)5. 0.• Recreation • •••••• . Heavy Industrial -v :i:111\0. 1 ;...,?e..4....i45"-- • • • ... EI1E0g0E14UE10e 0W1t.I1 1N0 Greenbeltg Manufacturing Park / Multiple Option - - • 325 328 327 326 I 32Wa / I 324 /' / I / / Itt I SITE PLAN 323 // / / / 1 J I 322 , // / / I J 0' 20' 40' GO' .80' 100' SCALE : tam Ilan nb l! i'i: r:,ulll I j / / . lO' 30' 50' 70' 90' / I I / /j/j 7 / r+ t i DRIVEWAY . Ne ?j / I PARKING H 321 /j 1 320 1/ / /oW, II--- r — t 31�1 1 I / I( I {— j \ \ L1) II I \ �329 lL I I I I IrLI TEMPORARY MODULAR I ' Z 318 i L------ \ OFFICE UNI-i', 12 0-� r I \ I Q I` I 1 I I I L ___ KING COUNTY \•9 F- / / I \ \ \ � Is'o" SOUTHEAST } l \ PUBLIC HEALTH 8 r \32 / f \ . N \�\ CENTER 1 / I ► ► I --- z / I I 1 (I �-___-- / I I PARKING 1 \ \\ Y 317 - L II\ ` 2 / / I I _ 1— 1 DRIVEWAY O><___---11-------.\ ) / • I 1 [ \ 1 PROPERTY CORNER , TYP./ I I I I \ \ 1 316 O I / I. I 1 H I 1L_ L� PROPERTY LINE,TYP� / / / / / / ��--___—=_�� 316 317 318 3/0/ ° -- 1 • / / 2 / 2�_ _� 3231 ���I�;,��--- �12\�C3��� 320 322� 325 �27 328 �28 �; ---�--—_.f...-_...�-- --; E —�—,-l—� -:---�-�1�1—l\:.==I---------\....\--;--; ,Ire,—f—/ — —E-1-�- 1--(—� / >-r-_ --) )-------� Q -* RENTON VOCATIONAL ----I 'd;' — �k9i /2 TECHNICAL INSTITUTE Ili ( R_SIDEIAL 1 I - � / 0 o1 QI - � _ II \I - z I• L ❑ In I 1) '' I I I Ol IDRTHEA T -d STREET v I — 1 1 II i --------11 — ' `� l 1• ' j I I� ' ; ��AS STATION J , I i _ / / TIRE STORE /J .1.17 I__L_ (-] , / . —r---PROJECT SITE: TEMPORARY MODULAR �� RING COUNTY —J Ir 1 p OFFICE UNIT) 12`x60' �- 5 RE S.E. PUBLIC I. Q ��° HEALTH CENTER ce ��NpR N Pc,1 o Q / — t- N cc • I ' W s LL i N 2 G - (- KING COUNTY )- ROAD DISTRICT z . .—. NO. 2 SHOPS GRAVEL PIT ; GRAVEL PIT t9 _z Y REN 1ON CORPORATE LI`:1IT NI VICINITY MAP w `;;� E SCALE : I 200'-0'� �� S - t CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL AI #: SUBMITTING DATA: FOR AGENDA OF: 4/2/90 Dept/Div/Board.. City Clerk/Finance Staff Contact.. Maxine Motor AGENDA STATUS: Consent XX SUBJECT: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Public Hearing.. Decision; Seattle-King County Department Correspondence.. of Public Health, Conditional Use Permit Ordinance for temporary modular office unit, CU-126-89 Resolution Old Business.... EXHIBITS: A. City Clerk's Letter New Business.... B. Letter of Appeal Study Session... C. Hearing Examiner's Report, Other dated March 9, 1990 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Refer to Planning APPROVALS: and Development Committee Legal Dept Finance Dept.... Other FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required... Transfer/Amendment.. Amount Budgeted Revenue Generated... SUMMARY OF ACTION: Appeal filed by Barbara Hadley, representing Seattle-King County Health Department, accompanied by required fee received on March 23, 1990. `:: CIT' OF RENTON Finance Department Earl Clymer, Mayor March 26, 1990 APPEAL FILED BY BARBARA HADLEY, REPRESENTING SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT RE: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision, dated March 9, 1990, regarding conditional use permit for temporary modular office unit, CU-126-89 To parties of record: Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Renton City Code of Ordinances, written appeal of the hearing examiner's decision on the referenced matter has been filed with the city clerk, along with the proper fee of $75.00. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the written appeal and other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council's Planning and Development Committee, and the recommendation of the Committee will be considered by the City Council at a subsequent Council meeting. The council secretary will notify all parties of record either by mail or telephone of the date and time of the Planning and Development Committee meeting. If you are not listed in local telephone directories and wish to be notified of the meeting, please call the council secretary at 235-2586 any weekday after 1:00 p.m. for information. Sincerely, yn J. Petersen, CMC Deputy City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington '98055 March 26, 1990 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss COUNTY OF KING ) MARILYN J. PETERSEN, City Clerk for the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 26th day of March, 1990, at the hour of'5:00 p.m., your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail to all parties of record, notice of appeal of Hearing Examiner's decision filed by Barbara Hadley, representing Seattle-King County Health Department, Conditional Use Permit, File No. CU-126-89. /tag(..44/ Marilyn J. City Clerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 26th day of March, 1990. Notary P lic in and for the State f - - :_ Washin , residing in CITY OF RENTON CITY TREASURER SE6/\.�PT : 0206226 03-23-1990 11:56 om .......... ����������������������� �0�� /i�KHxHN �CCOUHT $75.0C /KU<6 �XnM/CDNDITlON USE PMT Y9p ?99.�9.9?9'99.qy,pi, 9999 '----_---_--- \0lAL D�E $75.00 � �EC[�VEU PAUL MU�AKAMl/KC HEALTH DE PT 0EC� $75.0C -------------- ' [U�AL �ENDERED $75.00 �HANGE DUE | / Seattle'King County .� | Department v,Public Health / i Barbara Hadley / Administration | � County Health Services Division . 11opremmomo Place South,Suite m00 / ^ (206)296-4668 Seattle,Washington ee1o^ ! ^ - • WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. CU-126-89C'Tv 0r RENTON Seattle-King County Health Department MAR 2 3 1990 RECEIVED The-undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal fcORTEPE or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated March 9, 19 90 . 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Name: Seattle-King County Health Dept. Name: Barbara Hadley Address: 3001 N.E. 4th Address: 110 Prefontaine P1 . So. , Suite 500 Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone No. 296-4700 Telephone No. 296-4668 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted •in the Examiner's Report) • No. 16 Error: "• . .new permanent facility's location and design are not finalized" Correction: Property for the new permanent site has been purchased on Talbot Road, directly south of Valley Medical Center and design plans have been initiated. CONCLUSIONS: No. 3 Error: "With ,rare exception these buildings are ugly." Correction: We do not disagree that these units generally have limited aesthetic value. We have presented landscaping plans revised at the suggestion of the City's landscape specialist to moderate the impact. In addition, our specifications for the unit indicated wood exterior in an effort to mini- OTHER: mize the contrast between the unit and other buildings in the area. No. 14 ' Error: ". . .timing of new construction is not set and neither is the location." As stated in correction to Findings of Fact No. 16, land Correction: has been purchased for the new permanent facility and design documents are currently being developed. The Health Department is willing to abide by the 2 year limitation of a conditional use permit and would be willing to do so in writing if so requested. 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: Grant conditional use permit. Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: - VW/T.0 Appellant/Representativ , ignature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. WRITTEN APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION/RECOMMENDATION TO RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICATION NAME: FILE NO. CU-126-89 Seattle-King County Health Department The undersigned interested party hereby files its Notice of Appeal from the Decision or Recommendation of the Land Use Hearing Examiner, dated March 9, 1990 . 1 . IDENTIFICATION OF PARTY APPELLANT: REPRESENTATIVE (IF ANY) : Name: Seattle-King County Health Dept. Name: . Barbara Hadley Address: 3001 N.E. 4th Address: 110 Prefontaine P1 . So. , Suite 500 Renton, WA 98056 Seattle, WA 98104 Telephone No. 296-4700 Telephone No. 296-4668 2. SPECIFICATION OF ERRORS (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Set forth below are the specific errors or law or fact upon which this appeal is based: FINDINGS OF FACT: (Please designate number as denoted . in the Examiner's Report) No. Error: Correction: CONCLUSIONS: No. 15 Error: "In the interim maybe the Health Department can work with RVTI . . . .to arrange for conference space." Correction: Alternative sites for conference space have been surveyed including RVTI . No satisfactory sites have been found that are avail- able on flexible schedules or large enough to accommodate the regular meeting schedules of the clinic. OTHER: No. ' Error: Correction: 3. SUMMARY OF ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is requested to grant the following relief: (Attach explanation, if desired) X Reverse the Decision or Recommendation and grant the following relief: Grant conditional use permit. Modify the Decision or Recommendation as follows: Remand to the Examiner for further consideration as follows: Other: 3/Vk Appellant/Representative i nature Date NOTE: Please refer to Title IV, Chapter 30 of the Renton Municipal Code, and Sections 4-3016 and 4-3017, specifically (see reverse side of page) for specific appeal procedures. 01, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN , being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 9th day of March 1990 affiarit deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this (1" day of circk , 1990. ja6,0-1A-- 1. �. Notary Pub in and for the State of Washington, residing a Cgw.A! therein. Appls;cat!uc; -F=etition, or Case #: CU-126-89 - SEATTLE KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT (Modular Unit) The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) • a - March 9, 1990 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT File No: CU-126-89 LOCATION: 3001 N.E. Fourth Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit to site a 720 square foot modular office building next to the existing Health Department building, in a G-1 zone. This building is intended to be a temporary structure. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Division Recommendation: Approval, with conditions. PLANNING DIVISION REPORT: The Planning Division Report was received by the Examiner on February 20, 1990 PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Division Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES The hearing was opened on February 27, 1990 at 9:00 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow File containing application, proof of posting •and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 -. Vicinity Map Exhibit #3 - Site Plan Exhibit #4 - Elevation Map Exhibit #5 - Landscape Plan The staff report for this proposal was reviewed by Senior Planner, LENORA BLAUMAN who noted the site is currently zoned for general use but 'is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as public use. Currently there is a King County health facility on the site. This modular building will be used for such events as staff meetings and conferences. The site is over four acres in size with access off N.E. 4th. Even though this site is located in the Heather Downs Moratorium district utilities are available because there is no sewer or plumbing required for the proposed building, only meeting rooms. Ms. Blauman said the ERC evaluated this proposal and issued a Determination of Non-Significance with the conditions that the applicant provide a landscape plan to address aesthetic impacts, as well as a construction plan which addresses erosion control, hours of work during construction, hauling routes, watering down of the site during construction and a cash bond to ensure street clean-up. The plans required by the ERC will be reviewed by staff and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Continuing, Blauman reviewed the criteria to be considered for a conditional use request stating the facility is located in the aquifer protection area but presents no problem because no plumbing will be contained in the building; staff feels there is a community need, and there will be no over- concentration of this type of use as there are no other services of this nature offered in the community. This proposed unit is considered to be compatible with the current complex and also the surrounding neighborhood. When asked if this request may open the door to other temporary structures being permitted throughout the city Blauman stated this particular structure is slated to remain on the site no longer than two years and will be screened with landscaping. She said this is a small structure and will be compatible with the present building. There will be a distance of forty feet between the new Seattle-King County fieaith Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page 2 structure and the existing building due to fire code requirements; the proposed development will displace ten or more parking spaces but will not present a problem because excess parking is available at the site; there will be no concerns regarding light or glare. In conclusion, Planner Blauman noted staff recommends the Hearing Examiner approve this request conditioned upon the applicant revising the plan to show a minimum of forty feet between the proposed modular unit and the main complex. Staff also recommends this conditional use permit be limited to a period of two years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, and that a cash bond in the amount of $5,000. be required to ensure the use will be discontinued and the building removed at the end of the recommended two year period. Responding for the applicant was BARBARA HADLEY, Administrative Assistant, 110 Prefontaine Place So., Suite 500, Seattle 98104. Ms. Hadley advised it is intended that the Renton Health Center facilities are to be relocated to property in Auburn, or near the Valley Medical Center in Renton. In the meantime it is felt the Health Department could better serve their current clientele more efficiently if they had more examination rooms within the current facilities. It is the desire of the applicant to use their current meeting rooms for additional exam space and move their meetings to the proposed unit. It is the plan to relocate to the new property within the next two years. Ms. Hadley said it is unknown at this time what the current site will be used for by the County after the health center is moved in the next two years. She said there are other county properties near this facility that may expand and become located on the current site. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak, and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 9:35 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, the Seattle-King County Health Department, filed a request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the erection of a temporary modular building on the Health Department Campus. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC), the City's responsible official issued.a Declaration of Non-Significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. The site is on the south side of N.E. 4th, across from RVTI, and located between Edmonds Avenue N.E. and Monroe Avenue N.E. The site is located just east of the crest of the hill where N.E. 3rd merges with N.E. 4th as it enters the Highlands. 6. The subject site was originally annexed to the city by the adoption of Ordinance 2249, enacted in June, 1966. 7. The subject site is zoned General (Single Family; Lot size - 35,000 sq. ft.), a classification it received upon annexation. 8. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of public and quasi-public uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the Plan. 9. The applicant proposes erecting a one-story modular building to the west of the existing health complex. The building would be 60 feet long by 12 feet wide. The structure would be oriented in a north/south fashion. 10. The new building would be used for conference rooms. Existing conference facilities would be converted to additional examining rooms. This modification is expected to reduce the waiting time at the clinic, but not increase patient visits or handling capacity. 11. The new building is not anticipated to generate additional traffic. This is related to the fact that patient load should not change. Seattle-King County Health Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page 3 12. The applicant proposes some perimeter,1landscaping along N.E. 3rd and 4th. Additional plantings around the structure including 6 larger trees 8 to 10 feet tall to be located along the west facade of the structure. Smaller shrubs would encircle the building. ' 13. Fire and Building Code regulations required the relocation of the building 40 feet from the main building.. This location makes the building stand out more prominently from its - surroundings. 14. Staff reports'that the site is served by sufficient parking for the existing use and proposed use. 15. The building is located in the sewer moratorium area, and is also located over the city's aquifer. The building will not be plumbed. 16. The applicant testified that the new permanent facility's location and design are not finalized. It also could not be ascertained if the current site would be vacated within the two years established by the ERC. Such decisions are within the scope of the Health Department's governing body. Similarly, reuse of the existing site remains undetermined. CONCLUSIONS 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest, will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C) which provides in part that: � v a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking, unless otherwise permitted, will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal._ r r- The requested conditional use is denied. As a preliminary matter, the point must be made that the issuance of a.Conditional Use Permit is discretionary and that the applicant is not entitled to use the property as requested as of right. 2. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the site for suitable public uses. The Seattle-King County Health Department complex no doubt fits that guideline. The proposed modular building violates the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and the city's vision statement by introducing a disparate, visually bland, if not unattractive building, in a prominent location. The Districts Objective of the Comprehensive Plan suggests projecting a favorable image and that new uses be designed to be compatible with existing uses. As a matter of fact, this provision of the Comprehensive Plan has been codified in Section 4-31-4(B)(3)(d) which states: d. Public and quasi-public buildings essential to the physical and economic welfare of an area, such as fire stations, electrical substations, telephone exchanges and community and regional parks. Buildings shall conform to and harmonize with the surrounding buildings as to the type of architecture, setback and landscaping. 3. The modular building proposed by the-applicant does not satisfy these requirements: Its architectural style is barracks-like. It is a 60 foot long 12 foot wide building. With rare exception these buildings are ugly. L 4. While there may be a community need for the proposed expansion, the form and location it takes cannot be divorced from the need. The location proposed by;the proponent is quite prominent. As one enters the Highlands area of the city the site cannot be overlooked., It will be located on a sweeping open space just as one crests the hill. ' l , Seattle-King County ».th Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page-4 5. After considering previous decisions regarding both temporary permits and conditional use permits to allow modular buildings, and being cognizant of City Council concerns,regarding the less than aesthetic nature of such buildings, this office believes that approving the permit would just be extending an inappropriate precedent and rewarding poor planning. 6. The issue of aesthetics applicable to this type of structure was first addressed in 1987 in File Number CU-028-87, wherein it was stated: • The need for the use in this location to serve a community need is questionable. The main concern raised by the request is the establishment of an interim use in a temporary building.' The metal siding and modular structure will not add to the aesthetic character of the area, although the landscaping will assist in softening the facade and attracting attention away from the facade. 4. Careful examination of the establishment of temporary office • buildings should [occur] in the future. As indicated, they are generally not characterized by aesthetic features and do very little to upgrade the r image of the City. Also, while the ERC imposed a time limitation - three to five years is not necessarily short term - pressure could mount to maintain it beyond that period, condition or not. In a thriving business, atmosphere the pressure for continued occupancy could be hard to resist once the building is in place. The City would be placed in an awkward position, if this or any applicant wanted to maintain such a structure beyond its established'time frame. One does not lightly, even considering the ERC's applicable conditions, ask a private party to remove any existing structure. Be that as it may, it would appear that the use in this case is reasonable since a reasonable landscaping effort has been mounted. And, hopefully the use will prove to be temporary as now proposed. 12. In conclusion, future analysis by staff should review the potential precedent of establishing temporary facilities to allow expansion, and further investigate the potential problems for removing such uses once, established. One can't help but believe that the applicant was, or should have been, well aware of their expansion needs prior to this time and arrived at a more permanent aesthetic solution." 7. Nothing has changed since that decision was issued, at least in terms of analysis. Although since that time this office has become aware that criticism of such uses'did come from some quarters, including members of the City Council, demonstrating that study of the issue probably was, and still is merited. In addition, this office would prefer policy direction on this matter - from the Council since the Council did not appear to wholeheartedly accept the city's own temporary addition. Since it is not clear how the Council reacts to such buildings, an advisory opinion seems prudent. That can best be achieved by forcing an appeal in the instant case by denying the request and permitting the City Council to review the issue. 8. While each use should obviously be considered on its merits, the financial wherewithal of some entities could make such modular units permanent additions to the streetscape, and if site plan review is to carry any weight, (where staff does attempt to meld new'uses into the existing streetscape), the issue of aesthetics, (even for worthy uses), cannot be totally ignored. Therefore, further policy direction from the City Council is necessary. Such direction would assist both the Planning staff and the Examiner to determine whether such uses are in the best interests of the city and its citizens. 9. A primary issue is what type of precedent is created by approving these modular buildings. Obviously approving this proposal will perpetuate similar requests. While that may make sense 'to the proponents of such projects for economic reasons, or to solve supposed short terms space needs, that does not help the city redevelop its image. 10. We see similar space needs constraints in King County's temporary jail complex. A complex that may not be so "temporary" after all. Once the precedent has been established it will be difficult to resist future requests for more, simply put, ugly modular units - which are no less practical than other structures. Denying this request will cause consternation, but it may result in better long range planning or more aesthetically designed temporary buildings. 11. On appeal, a resulting decision by the City Council should result in a clear consensus regarding the appropriateness of such buildings in the city's streetscape. Seattle-King County neaith Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page 5 12. It is obvious from the way the new community facility, the main fire station, and the senior citizen center structures turned out that there is a serious concern regarding architectural appearance. These structures all exhibit obvious aesthetic consideration. 13. Similarly, planning staff constantly argues for upgrades in landscaping, exterior treatment, form and architectural style and context in private projects, and approving structures as that now proposed would detract from those efforts. 14. Finally, the representative from the Health Department stated that the timing of new construction for the replacement facility is not set and neither is the location. They have done some prototype design work and the new facility may be in Auburn as suggested or it maybe near the Valley Medical Campus. This harkens back to the concern expressed in the above quoted decision regarding "temporary" versus "permanent." As noted above, it would be difficult to force the applicant to remove a building that is already on campus, if difficulties or change in plans occurred in the new siting. 15. This office reluctantly must deny the request. It is not appropriate in the proposed location and creates an unacceptable precedent to solving short term space needs. In the interim maybe the Health Department can work with RVTI, which is located just across the street, to arrange for conference space. DECISION The Conditional Use Permit for a temporary modular building is denied. ORDERED THIS 9th day of March, 1990. FRED J. KWJFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of March, 1990 to the parties of record: Barbara Hadley 110 Prefontaine South, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104 TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of March, 1990 to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Lynn A. Guttmann, Public Works Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Larry M. Springer, Planning Manager Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Ronald Nelson, Building Director Traffic Engineer Division Brent McFall, Administrative Assistant Kim Scattarella, Engineering Specialist Valley Daily News Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 P.M. March 23. 1990. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. Seattle-King County Health Department CU-126-89 March 9, 1990 Page 6 All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • _ . . - — • . : 1..11 ,,:i.. .3'.:, 1,• 4 -ribtlziPil' . !`,.(0 7,/, Fr--! c, •• ,,..e.,,, -,0 , ,,9,4:5 17:2, 1 J — . 74. er . : . , 4 I],-1%.4 .r.1,,I.i1-1,1,11,14e,‘1,1,yiliel,711,11,1 tikrj .r1 , • L, ,,, ,• - : Z-1•21'17... ..- '' \\ i i-1.--'"7 4101 • I . 4,,,C.- • ..? A , . , , 1 ; I I 1111 *.:(...)1 I I? ..' 41 1'4' ..")..' --. 1: I , • • mq0,1 flN., ••••'• • '' 4 3, 0..° Q • " '- . !1 p u, • ,, • , , • 1 1•-. •,.: t sVsssi.s.4%, n , c. -, , ri .4 1,,,o,,_.„)3 4 .. 4._ _...i...... . . !.!.,3s..c it,-,:tc.,,, 7..., , _la.,•-•1.- ). *4%s. • ,11,,,a, .., ; ,., ,.. 4........, -Uri ly53.5 3138 _.° 't '....)_. ' ,',.. '. • -IT-7, ••::% si• ...3 .t...,.- , z. ?,, _,,,,-, —1—"„ .—'-1-5 4,3:7 '1E -I C• 4'5 . ' ' \-::-.- 7 . . ‘. ‘,..,, / , I• i • • • . °Si WE. . .7 ''-- -.) 3.7 c'' '7 6 A•,..... • I --5 I:I ,..j /.', •-•i--d j? 3 1 g3, . 4 7 ! „ \ ,' - ., ., ' .., •‘.1-<,. ''' 1 .:-- !f--)1 7-j-- ac,!; 615;38 1.59 60 65 " -I- . • • . ...,•./ I '54-:' CI —6 e -----/„.. .. 6 6 z 4., . . . . :R;,,,13,.., ; , .........\>, 5 5 —6 7 .., `' • 1 ' ''' '' .Ili— 1 : '..- ' • .... ;-.- R L Is+ , ' . : 5.:.' 5. , 6 8- 0 f3 HILLS • r. ------... i• • • 'JO C Al lorir-o I•• - ..;" ••••• ,- . . . • •. . . ... ... . F 6 - 3 • 4 4 G— 1 - : - - ' . • ., .., .. . / , : 0 • RE ENVVOOD ; , —4 / : . • -• - I'M , // // ...,. .F c, : r, ,1 E_ F.c_:RY , , ..... / / 71., • : r:• ' • ..., ' 1$01 .. .-. • ' . 1:—. 1 . . . . . 4 ,,,/,' , .. . . ..., • C . „, D ' • • ':.;:I;.. : ,..... • • / /,/, • \, \ —7.c..V /N, • INA r-.. 2 mo• S-T:.:s : • ' . \ \ ' / / . \ \ : / / - • . . \ • I - / / \ • 1,• I / 4<>/ I /QJ/ - i //( / i 1 I / / . I 1 / • . 1 ' I / // / /I , /0./ ' - • - 1 I I /(...)/ •/ / ' — I. / / • • I I I i -....// • • ' I , /( /0/ 'I-- t- I /4.., / rksi=x1 •:_._ ! _ . • • . . APPLICANT Seattle-King Co . 'Health Dept . TOTAL AREA 4. 89 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. Fourth Street EXISTING ZONING G-1 , General EXISTING USE Public Health Center • . PROPOSED USE Temporary modular office building COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN S COMMENTS Located at3001 N.E . Fourth Street • . • `r •- Scale 155 =2000, <r:"'' ~r:.si_'F:, • 000000000. <A `•''. °0000°000•—I 1 •. -,-N,---:_.:-.-.....,• ---- _._ ! .,-,,,.,..:„.- - 1 . T .. ,..:..,,,„ • . ,, ,.. • _ ....: ....•:"...1.ro •.) 0 i .• --1 tiAlti4:::• •4' r< r 1 J _. . ---- ___._ . ,,,...„:„....,.. • :.:.:i...• .:. ....... , ... .,._ _____........ — .-A M::::1::::,.p.,J ilikal .-,:. .. 1MiltI •cc 111=1= : 1■■' I - •0000 IU'.•alill111111811/ MT: T.?, .q■�� C�IIIMIIIN � o .�•� 1■■100000 .0000.,00000 III■. It .11 `_, • - ''4• 1 f 1■■�� °'f Ir /- � 000000' ■■■��■�I ii; ..•.•. I 1••000000o `�D I CC�d ���■■V■■t 00000000• \-ccz_s_t_..,-- I(1q} 1 000000'r I II■•■■I■■:1 I000000• c�>,-�.? �(1r��l■■�■■•■1 . GA 00000• ® rrl ■■ ■•''' \,.. I■■I■'. 1000000 ' <.j`�+' 0 • e :• ' Miiii:1•••:••• "\ ••••::::•:•,„••••Itill. i • L--......-1 1 • . \• • • -r,.. ::::i::•:::i:' MI ' 401 .. ▪•l•• • 1W-61-1.111-As 1• sI 0000000000• app (`i`,r 0000000000 L. • • •• • ..• .1., i.ct .0..0.0..: ill_ ,,,,.... I. .•.•.•.......... ▪ _.._. .. • ,.., ..... . • • • • ... ap • • • • • „.., ,,, ..., . ,I.z.ii____H:,.80:11isipt. i • • • • • \ :::•• • • • . • 1_ LLL • + • • • ii • -. i‘, , . . . " Uall ... •▪••• •:it 7; j, t . •r li■iiiiii■■■■..r. . i■ 4 ... ':o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: ::t\�■11■■■■►'• .•:•::• ••• lammual r■■■■11■r ■ -%:: ::;::::: ' '1ii''.•00000000oO 1 ■■■i6.111.E■■ii :;:< ..'';: •�■���1■. 9 4,,t1. .-0000 •00000°0000 �■ 7:r■■■■•■■I'v.:: :.ti.: :: 000000 �"- �■■■.- :fi•..' .000 o°•-•oo .. ■■■■ o0 0. 0 0 o• ■oo0 0 0 .oi O v+•7 O00 00 O+fti4�n ... ��++ 00 ••I OO O mow• •00 wifl1� ?`::v3 •00 O O O ..00 ..W:F t' .. O 00 O�i 00 o 0 0 r' •o i .o 0 00 00 0.o• .00'o o_ oo••0000 000 00o � o �. op..-----■■ / 000•°0 Q ,p0000` .o c'• o0U y•,� r 000 '� >:■■■■ 1�Jr` Oo000 o i................�.Ir•�■■■I ■ '• ,,F• •00000000000000 O•••0•1• ••O '••••' 000000000000�..■..... R . �: °° 0000 °° ' �::: :�:::::::::: : •000 00000000000 I`r 00000t o00000000000000 j` /■1 •°0000 �' •000000000 000000 oo• C� ;r• • ••0000 o I,9 •0000•°°° ',i' .■ :F .°0000 0000 `�rp 0000•°°°• r,: `I r, r •°0000 o - - :! 000 .— .t o0 .• op o .i 0 • A'/ �I 000 000 1 {�. •;1?<r. I �' r7 .0000 000• `y r �,Y.t.c. •0000 } _ tip • . n IL h �r f ROM. ] E ,� F ' • :BLS • ■■ rJ' }5 Amn 7] on. . re.iU. ^t`" i t • �7'� . •n? .,.j7•r<3. 111 , , ,7;tti,.ra .. _\ •rF 5! .Q}''. n;: ;-�•j.�,F�lli". i=�',irC•'Vr1^+o r°� , <�: S e fi;crl.,.x�t; ,y 1 ln,.�r on11. •:rfi'•a)"�•• rF>°2� C!'.•.i 7.,'.f� . ^,n� y. J r,.t .c,-- re`t yt '-■` ',.' .>. ;=lr', ''S n'% J: `O q'epp , P •�4r( ::•:: ':,l: -Qf G`�' o' • M $ !'ii' V ...2 :,•... '•. �.. .ram. < Vi •0• ''I,�r F3 L .? ' �,',-.n .o,•,'vz':. 'Fr"r ▪ t'iBl 'ty�� :r 1 tf. • '' l. . ".'''�'?' �. [ fr.'4, ▪t: rf'... .ti.t• , •�f• 'il' 1. ,,� ry• r;4i q,c.iJ ,;.;'C,. c`',.• 161 . '11 ' o nt fk t•�"' r:i•`e. - \.n?i yj .)• r.ri�, [' •'C,:c nr>, ij ``��.Y;+ C. '/'.r ,�ti"L. •Ai, .'6 `.31..• F„ <11.•r.•01,l�'Cl'."; C';7'�, >. j:. r,- Cr+� -es rn�' rr .. oC?,'y?J. -(,, ,43•..1 5,.+ .,..c>vi \ •1:,'f^ ((< r z:.. .f r C�..,„?.en.,..., r?;.,?' 0 crl' r' L>'R;".,.,r+C ,.t,!.A,.T." ;,n .`r __ .t .? �(:if`'?r'• •. {c' `ti.f.:�F�- .•n.,ao,:ry�o2:c.C�• - :,,c;l. a.0000 0 '•.Ei;., ,/<,.c C'0 ,`j 'n'�°., .i •'5 `-�r' ,c. (c74 •. `f.� r fer ':C.•;i' ,�.r'):cSt."." r>i•°".'•,•rfr..•y,ir'eN. :o 0000o i�.' h :}. 4" {Y 6 F';(r"� . g:"tFC ` r o�'�c n _ •O, r-�fc' .,'?,•, : 0000 ot, .), o • o .O; •F<`.:• M: •N7 C4 ,t .f::{>� ▪.{i•:. .t • , JI,-,. � '. -t' c. 't• ' 'n,1<j' •• ,� • • '�• ;:r..'PC•.•p�r;i•°;{r ',r� .n.• '. •>'r^•••o : ^ � ar; .r ••_ •°O t.}[C'.q S:`S- t,01: '' .,`}N'C 7 � 5:?o. ,.rt„r e"r v. .,�•'F7t �;. r,p ,r�r, f7..{;_;�•' , . ,ckE. ,`n'f,,t t'7 n o•.,°'2;'YC:S; .,: €s .';•,',,�V r `!',[?�.k,:i' • iy .c,•' r _ �>1:J.. '•-:L :�f"dYr: '• „G7 ,) P" ;C;,t ri�l;.° ,. ci vr• ',}<,51.+"U� •�r' .. .• 'r.,:� y � / ,,.r t' t:. — <;,tif`: . �il. �•.- y •)�tij:J.`cr�i v,:t ',O'o b . '� •r• �..+ ;�,. .: y }.• ,2• ▪ ;, '<.„ t5 "[,•t 1 cu n f,.,• % :.:;C^"..<�`. ••_ 1. ' 7;•Cr•.' \t ,�t� •fc; <,t� .�,;, , T,`� c.',> F •fir -0.t' FJ''' 0 ,•5� '.Q Z. 1,• •c4?ic 0 yC2•ti, o'>i:�J <fi T., t1 w i n •c5:. �. :'i. .��i i.`!,`I 1 l •i•. ` .t'1 :n, c .. i3„ `• „t C;.' c.�t: t.i,' t 00)000 �5'+` 00000 r:j. .000: ° LAND USE ELEMENT •OOC°• pN.0.0:0•.000J• �woo•iii:. (I.,: •• . . ...,:, ..�.• WrgIIIIIIIW_•"DOOO,• 000• . . 00• - Single Family ■'■■■'■ Commercial :),,i i - • � • `V c ! : Low Density ,•�\\\� Office / Office Park •: '•' k 1 Multi-Family •:fi r�1 \.I • v::.... 0000001 . ����• ! � •00000V444 a�0000000 0000• -; :� , .°0000° Medium' Density ,000000, Public/Quasi-Public 0000°Jygl Multi—Family a°°°°°°° •0• 00• 0°°• .- •0000°°I .000.00o, •0• 00000•- <rJ 0000° I ::::>:: :: :: 0000°° t tl, :.* , 000000• ii.;, �1.F•\ High Density 4 : Light Industrial �p��• � ; '.,' ,a. g Multi-Family 9 • • __, I). ,, .•:::::NAV‘in:�`'` = i Recreation '•'.'. HeavyIndustrial , r " '. 1\ , : Greenbelt _____ Manufacturing Parr J'.,',G 0 iC>�r • / Multiple Option • 329 328 ' 327 326 325��/ I '' 324 / ' / f / / I I I SITE PLAN 323 // / / / I I // / / � 1 0' 20' 40' 60' 801 100' 322 I 1 SCALE ; I,'''is I:,,r!t,l ola;m I I.lI m;imi I j / / - 10' 30' 50' 70' 90' / I / / y / I / / / DRIVEWAY . N �Ye / I I ( I w <�i% E I r 0 N/ rb / l / PARKING I cJ P� 321 / // / ' I I I • tY ct- - 32o / // / //j6w- 1 1 1 ' F- 1 I I \ �329 lL /' i EMPORARY MODULAR I � .:, I I L____-- \ z 318 I I (TEMPO OFFICE UNIT, 12'i6O- .�% I 7 \ ml Q 1 \ 1 I 1 I • L__—� KING COUNTYcC / I 1 1 \ 15'o" SOUTHEAST i �� / I \ PUBLIC HEALTH Ind 1 \ \ \N \� \ �\ CENTER 328Z 1 1 ) I \ \\l 1 i2/ 1---J z / 1 � I L -s-- I \"---PARKIN / I } / I I I iDRIVEWAY T4.-- __-___1-1------- ) • / I r PROPERTY CORNER , T� I 316 I / I I I \ II / / / ! I 1 I I ) . i O I L I 1 / PROPETY LINE,TYP --�� __ L� i / I I / /� ��_ __ -- I _ / 317 318 320/ /23 -- 3231 I�I:i��=_ �C3 I� �� / �- 1 1 II ��-- —`\—�1? / 320 322 325 �27 328 �28 — - -- • • RENTON VOCATIONAL .- y• -- ��q� fa TECHNICAL INSTITUTE. z ❑ �. I RESIDENTIAL 1 — I -i ❑ /� _ N.E. --' CT. /' . J n F I i i U I I I I I i-7 l 1 QJ ;IORTNEAJ1 l a STREET % l �I . I , .� I , � , I I ' J j�l � I I�'AsSTATION TIRE 'STORE/j /• r i [1 PROJECT SITE: ' TEMPORARY MODULAR KING COUNTY �J i 0 OFFICE UNIT, 12'",G0' /'"0 5KR S.E. PUBLIC o • -5?. HEALTH CENTER ce � NOR� _---N_ O U1 K I al i Li. I N Q CL KING COUNTY } ROAD DISTRICT t -- NO. 2 SHOPS z GRAVEL PIT ; Ov GRAVEL PIT z z_ Y RENTON CORPORATE LI;AIT • . N VICINITY MAP ` v� l. SCALE : I 200'-0I' S 40. _ v1EMORANDUM To 1_61\ORK f• Date From (- )g R1Z I Subject \I) - G• 1flODUl.AK O>=rICt L)k)rt'- LAL)D CApl& p k v ED 11 1' EV155O Liqmo3cApilOto pLA+o D1 <TT.D N ARcH !, 196/0, AS KfauesitD putt. 66- 1-3t E 111K . 1146 FLAi'l' 15 ISF516 Pitil ac PSI A k)O Mite-es cc:10mio,U No. �• CF ec_pi210..wq m!�'iC�'f too cou rN-i Oo . Pu tcrW z_ si+Kuy5r36tei Amptrooccylitivi 4 LoCATLcm) WILL tqeCt5SAILY W 1714 T iL.,0, pareirr� 1 Sv��`11�1 t SUSS 5E2. �V UENT To zL,LC, Rouil^1 � 'INE . .... • ....... . ...•...... ... �� ..:.,...,..:.:*:.:: :.] :. ,..,.:-.. ,i,,.:,:.,,,,:...,..:..:.:.,.i.:.:...]:.:,,x.,:..,..:,,.,..:..::::.•:::::.1:....::...:...„:...:„.:!•,•.::•.::,•1...:•••.......::::.•,•.:•.:.•.,..••••,•••:••...:.:••••:.•....••.:.:.i..,•.::••••,:•:::ii...:.„•••,•••„•••,••:::::.:•..:•::••:...i.•• ................... C.O.IvI2y1EN.CINCa+:AT 9 QQ AIvi:FEBRLT :s::: .::„,,, :: .::::.... ..:.:........,: .•.. DIN: : :>:: >:>:':: : > g.: IL ::.CO.UNCIL:.CHAIvIBERS�`SE;CQND:FL0.4�R:REl�'PCgN::MUNICIPALTJ,,,,,,, G.;:•::::::•:::::..::::.:•:..•:.;. (1 :il IlCCE Sar ' `.rde :::. ::.;a hcatiQn ;:lisred; re;an: df:appli14hOn:.ninhe.:•:i .l�'; d::br. . . .i n::: :.:: :;:.•: .::: ::.:m.;; which::the.;:will::be:heard::::Items:will be.calledfor hemg at the discretion oft e Hearing ;; PROJECT NAME: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT NUMBERS: ECF;CU 126 89 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G 1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. The proposed project would be located at 3001 N.E.Fourth Street. i . • > e:I:. :<': : :::::: T:O14:RW >» < < >> ' < <No: <::::>:::::<::::::::: >:::::::::•:::<:::::::::»:: >: ::»>:::::.::..:::..: . NT.::1'LiNNTNG...U�V�S. aN...............::::::::::. :::•. :. :.............. :>::::�::�>�:�>�:�:�: :�:��::::::: ... ... ... .�FZDA;V'��*::Q�'..SER�I�C�..$Y..:.:MAI'.LING:•;::::::::::::::;:�>;:.;::.:<•>;:�::•;:•:•;;;:.�::: On the b day of deposited in the mails` of the U ited States a sealed. envelo e containing 1e � ,b�,ezi& e c` Y1� 4, tC documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • ate► N\LLV alC.a."A �t I�Ic -'tt C.a. 4.1 ,a.I4' . ►1c fc ;I4 s. 111A„;it • • (Signature of Sender) rv�._ Subscribed and sworn to me this ,9('j day of , 19 cy .too ./Z-e- X- Notary Public in and for the State of Washiigton residing at /=/1)/i0 'f therein. • City of Seattle King County Norman B.Rice,Mayor Tim Hill,Executive CM, 1 Seattle-King County Department of Public Health FE8 ,�y©NN Bud Nicola,M.D.,M.H.S.A.,Director February 7, 1990 7990 Donald K. Erickson, AICP, Zoning Administrator City of. Renton Planning Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: In response to your letter of notice dated December 27, 1989, Re: Temporary Modular Office Unit for 3001 N.E. Fourth Street, we have the following re- quested information: 1) Landscaping plan is enclosed in Super K Graphic as requested. 2) The site identified for placement of the unit is a flat level site with grass. The unit will be blocked, leveled, tied down and skirted accord- ing to code and manufacturers specifications. Plans for such are en- closed. No erosion or migration is anticipated since the grassy ground cover will not be dug up or disturbed. No special street permits are needed for transport of this type of building from the site of origin in Kent to the temporary site in Renton. The transport will be scheduled so as not to coincide with commuter hours in morning or evening. Given the above, it does not appear that street clean-up would even occur since no soil, rocks or debris would be disturbed. Note #1 : No sewer improvements or hook-ups are planned. Note #2: The modular unit will be located a minimum of 40 feet from the main complex. The vendor is aware of this requirement. If it appeared closer on the drawings, that is due to our difficulty insuring "scale" on such plans. Note #3: The roof top has only normal venting. The air conditioning and heating elements are located at the end of the building not on the roof. Please let me know if there is any further action required on our part. I can be contacted at 296-4612 or in my absence please contact Barbara Hadley at 296-4668. Sincerely, 41.6t) 61,d— Elise Chayet Director, County Health Services Division EC/k cc: Don Cherno, Office of Capital Planning Paul Murakami , Southeast District Administrator Barbara Hadley, Sr. Administrative Assistant Troy Jella, ATCO 110 Prefontaine Place South,Suite 500 Seattle,Washington 98104-2614 (206)296-4600 9 Temporary Modular Office Unit PUBLIC HEARING February 27, 1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING APPLICANT: Seattle-King County Health Dept. FILE NUMBER: ECF; CU-126-89 LOCATION: 3001 N.E. Fourth Street A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular office building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. This building is intended to be a temporary structure, to be in place for a period of two years. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: King County Facilities Management Division 2. Applicant: Seattle-King County Health Department 3. Existing Zoning: General Use, G-1 4. Existing Zoning in the Area: Public Use, P-1; Business Use, B-1; and Light Industrial, L-1. 5. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Public/Quasi Public Use 6. Size of Property: 4.8 acres 7. Access: N.E. Fourth Street 8. Land Use: Seattle-King County Health Department Southeast Public Health Center 9. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Renton Vocational/Technical School East: Retail tire store South: King County Road District #2 Maintenance Shops West: Gravel pit C. HISTORICAL/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Initial Annexation N/A 2249 6-22-66 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities a. Water: A sixteen inch water main runs along N.E. Fourth Street. b. Sewer: An eight inch sewer line runs along N.E. Fourth Street. c. Storm Water Drainage: Storm water drains from the subject site into a twelve inch concrete pipe on N.E. Fourth Street and continues to drain in a southwesterly direction. . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Thx, KIEARING EXAMINER 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the City of Renton as per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit: Metro routes #107, #108, and #147 run along N.E. Fourth Street. 4. Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: The Highlands Neighborhood Center is approximately one mile northwest of the subject site; Liberty View Park, Cedar River Park and the Community Center are approximately two miles southwest of the site. E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1. Section 4-704, General Use (G-1) zone. 2. Section 4-748, Conditional Use Permit. F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1. Northeast Renton Plan, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 55-60). 2. Community Facilities Goal, City of Renton Comprehensive Plan Compendium, 1986 (pgs. 24-26). G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The applicant, King County Health Department, currently operates a Public Health Facility on the subject property. New facilities are being constructed in Auburn, Washington, which are slated to be complete in approximately two years; at that time, King County will relocate all facilities on this site to the new complex. In the interim period, Health Department Facility administrators are finding that insufficient space is available for employees to provide timely services to clients. As a result, an application is being made to provide additional office/conference space in a temporary building to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when new facilities are ready for occupancy. 2. The Environmental Review Committee evaluated this proposal on December 20, 1989; the Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated, with the following conditions, designed to address environmental impacts related to aesthetics, land use, and construction activities: a. That the applicant provide a landscaping plan, including plantings designed to be sufficient in type, number and dimension to screen the modular unit, to address aesthetic impacts. This plan should be subject to the approval of the Landscape Planner in advance of review of the conditional use permit application by the Hearing Examiner. b. That the applicant provide a construction plan including: 1) erosion control for the construction area and to protect against migration of soil onto adjacent right-of- way; 2) approved construction schedule/hours; 3) approved hauling routes/hours; 4) periodic watering down of the site as required to control dust/debris; and 5) a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of $1,000.00. These plans must be approved by the Public Works Department, the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 3. Various City Departments have reviewed and commented on the proposal. The majority of the staff reviewers recommended that the proposal be approved; some conditions were suggested. Staff comments are attached; the content of these comments had been addressed in the text of the report. 4. Section 4.478(C) lists eleven criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider along with all other relevant information in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Th.., .TEARING EXAMINER a. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinances of the City of Renton. The proposed temporary facility is designed to facilitate the provision of more effective public health services. The facility is allowed under the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of Public Use/Quasi-Public Use. It is also consistent with goals, objectives and policies for the provision of community (health care) services in Renton -- e.g. "adequate health care services should be available (IX- G); viable health services should be maintained (IX-G.3). The Comprehensive Plan calls for particular attention to be directed to sensitive areas in consideration of development. The temporary modular unit is planned to be located in Zone I of the City's Aquifer Protection Area; staff has considered the suitability of the plan and finds that because the proposed use will be exclusively for offices and conference areas (no plumbing is to be connected to or from the unit), no impacts from operation are anticipated to the aquifer. Construction mitigation measures required by the Environmental Review Committee have been planned to address impacts which could occur to the aquifer during the staging process. b. Community Need: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (1). The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental overconcentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposed development is planned as a minor expansion of an existing King County Health Department campus. No other facility is located in or near our community at the present time, therefore, the temporary facility will not result in overconcentration.. (2). That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. Staff believe that the proposed location is well-suited for the temporary office building, because it is convenient to the existing facility and there is ample space for the proposed expansion. c. Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: 1. Lot Coverage: Lot coverage in residential districts (R-1 and R-2) shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) and the lot coverage of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage in all other zones shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Lot coverage for the combined existing and proposed development does not exceed the 35% maximum permitted for the G-1 zoning which has been established for this property. 2. Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located: Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The proposed temporary structure, located forty (40) feet to the west of the main complex, as recommended by staff, will meet all setback requirements established in both the Zoning Ordinance (Section 4-706 - G-1) and the Building Code. The structure will not be located in any required yard area. 3. Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Thu, idEARING EXAMINER and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The proposed temporary unit is a one-story structure, which falls well within the 35 foot height limit established for the G-1 zone. d. Compatibility: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood: (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) • The proposed modular unit is compatible in use with the existing complex. It is also generally compatible in design with surrounding developments (residential and non-residential). Based upon concern about the advisability of permitting modular structures in the community on a permanent basis, however, staff is recommending that the life of the unit be limited to a maximum of two years. This time period should be sufficient to allow for the completion of construction of the new King County Health Department project in Auburn. The design and scale of the proposed temporary structure is generally complementary to"the permanent structures. Staff will recommend relocation of this modular unit to a distance of forty (40) feet from the main structure to ensure adequate light and air circulation and to conform to Uniform Building Code regulations. Screening of all rooftop equipment will be mandated under the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Landscaping recommended for the periphery of the building should serve to screen this development from surrounding public uses and commercial developments and from more distant residential neighbors. e. Parking: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone in which the proposed use is located if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.3903, 4-22-85) The proposed modular unit is planned to be located in an area presently used for parking. While the unit will displace approximately 10 parking spaces there is abundant conveniently located parking elsewhere on the site -- in an amount well in excess of the parking requirements set by the Parking and Loading Ordinance for the combined existing and proposed development. f. Traffic: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed to potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. Little or no new traffic is anticipated to the site as a result of the proposed development -- as it is designed to provide improved service to existing clients, rather than be designed to provide increased levels of service. No difficulties have been reported by the proponent or by City staff in accommodating existing traffic either on the site or on access routes. g. Noise, Glare: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. No notable noise impacts are anticipated to result from the addition of the proposed modular unit. Light and glare are also not anticipated to be greater than that level expected from such a unit. Landscaping required around the building should serve to reduce light and glare from the building to the parking area and from the vehicle circulation system to the structure. h. Landscaping: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. In order to mitigate light and glare impacts and aesthetic impacts from the proposed development, the Environmental Review Committee established conditions for landscaping improvements for this site which are compatible with the requirements established through the Landscaping Ordinance (4-744). The applicant has been working with the City's Landscape Planner to develop a landscape plan which is consistent with those requirements. . PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Thy, HEARING EXAMINER i. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subiect to he provision of the use district in which they are located. Not applicable. j. Conversion: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. Not_ applicable. k. Public Improvements: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. The proposed modular unit will serve as an office building. No new or extended water lines will be required. Standard improvements to the structure will be adequate to address storm water run-off impacts. The project is in the Heather Downs Moratorium area. While no new or extended sanitary sewer lines are necessary, the City Council has been informed of about this development, as required under the Moratorium Ordinance. No objection has been offered by the Council. H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommend that the Hearing Examiner find in favor of the proposed conditional use, the King County Health Department temporary modular unit (CU 126-89) with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant revise the proposed site plan to provide a minimum forty foot (40') separation.between the modular unit and the main complex in order to provide compatibility (e.g. adequate light and air circulation) between structures and to address City Uniform Building Code regulations. 2. That the conditional use permit for the proposed temporary modular unit be limited to a maximum period of two years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy and that a cash bond in the amount of $5,000.00 be required to ensure the discontinuance of use and removal of the structure at the end of that permitted two year period. I� ,/,/--i (tea/'!, ',>: fO`~te t•t\ ', '\.; I ' I';.;• 9' �". , — e 0 41 ] i I�1• L�lai 1 - I ' '/'''/ '!." '! I;NF• 7 'aI''y.'i2. •021� _ _ ; 7, Pas' i t1- 1T :1af,:• •1= oaf. ::j , I,,a�,., t,�� � , , t n 11 I 9 i x��aJls a t' (' ? t i9 ° li .`'( 6.I ' ., �' . ..r.c 1 II - : Rom'' 1 Ixlil•Is ...;L:' I . 1" 1 1 I I I w �� I. ll �ro O /'� • ]I — �—� p :,J, .fi).f S' 4J •a • :� Jac 1 �� _t - i:� • •• •♦ - x9 ZIP'� IMMI '5.36373� �4 t � t•, t!� �� i • a •• ♦ ♦ v'• ... &'r• �,. xa 3 I]_' T?.1-4.7 'J F.. . -: t' a , t> + •' ♦•,♦♦.� • ♦.♦.���� `'�' ,.71' `.1 .'-.I JCt t 37 °i :'15 a 1aj.. , \ / . I s i ,5 /�] 7 �d Cg57585aF0 65 z -ho• �j._• ! fl h ' �/G 66 + ti. yA 0 55 r— • • i J rR;4.p7' 525.! 68 RLn; 7 . )R HILLS �. E ® 53 - I E h ��.., • . 6g. wa ✓OC'P.II�JPIlaI I • r { T. • 1-- 1RK 4eIP IA.,.R.:'179:,q n 76 ..5 74�3 •z'7, 64 70 ? - 3(,HOOL 1 • •. — iJri'' • ••. ‘ —4. G- 1 . • -� ' / • t': G0E ENWOOD r.r. 1ET-�R ' • / ' r / "1 .. : . .. - • . : �� • �_ 1 . • • , • ,I /' �` /- v-ii/ — II • /i < t 'lv/ ' �- — —� / ' , \ ,' //N. / - N . 2)a0 g-r.;'• . - - \\ \ /, /, . • / /\I / / S . ^ 11 ./� , 11 / / ' 1 1 /�/' I 1 , I / // 1 1 /bpi • 1 / / 1 / 1 1 /1 1 / �/ I . _ • ,// �i� 1 1 /'60.' I I' I I (Z_11 - • • • • APPLICANT Seattle-King Co . Health Dept. TOTAL AREA 4. 89 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E . Fourth Street EXISTING ZONING .G-1 , General • EXISTING USE Public Health Center PROPOSED USE Temporary modular office building COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN • COMMENTS Located at3001 N.E . Fourth Street ..,..,..:.,.",........„ ....,,,,. ....,..--...., -...,.....,.„.„,„:„...:„.,•:„„.,,,,,,,.....,...,..::,,.:....„.•::;....Z.,,A :. ,':.:,,.:;';,,,::•',.-.. ...•?,,,:',.'„,,,,,..,..;:r.:..:,....;.:-.;....i.f7z::......:;,,•.',,::27,..:,,..:1. .',.._i;,,,,.v,;.,,!-:.-„,:‘,.:,.::.,...7...-..-.-‘..';;,.re,..,.,.....s:- ;:,,,...:•;>•'"•• i . '-'62,,,,:‹s'.,:?;.,;;:,'";•'..,`,-,-..;:4.:,,,F. :--!:c..7. ,-;-:;,-;:-.•::,,,.-I:...- --, --;::,.•:::::'4.--.:::r.'''.f;::-.--, - , Scale . 1 '5 =2000" ..' lioNti.,,,-....,.:::.-e.. •,,,.•-•;-•,,, -:.- c,,,..,..-..,,,,•-•,•.--.J5•.= ,-•••,..:::,,i....,,,,,",-...... ,•,,,,,...,,, . •-•.:-•••••,•:.••• - ,.. ., .. ,•:•,., 0-:,-. .„,,..,,,,, ,,,,- " ....i • c..c.'.'..--.5•-:-:A;tr ,z;,•:::.5-; . ,,.,',.. :(-••, -..(..;•3100:,••-- 1 . , 1 : .k ,-,-3,-,•- - -,,,---,- --- " .. .., . - . ,• ..• --.. - 1_.( - . I 1 .__ . : ' , ,,,.,.af:,: ... •,.., . ..., • N:•••:" .•-'''.5' '.:.:4_, ‘•••::::,•,,,,.', Ili .2;'•N "-."- ."..:,,,'1•••;:r1 I ME ":I::.:.:.:.:.:.:•. .s.:,',":::.'.7::s'‘.1k. ,„•• ... .••• :.:'::.:.'-...5..:1.:!...7.•:•.:: •:,1(',4,1.f,.:7; ,,,- /41 •-.. I .... r•-• , •• i••••• iro:N/ .,„,.::::::::•,,,.„., r, „..„, _,... . --/ ----- ----- . ••••• (••..• ... •••••. •,....od ::,::::::.: ;.,;-.•,,..,;;e: ..- -.. • i , ,,,, to.....0....0„. ,..,......:.::„: ,:. •.. ...-.,, , . ....,rc,..,-.', • --, `'-- •i''' alininn/1.§.1/11 .>'''.`1 • :VIEW ... .. ::i.......:.....: ......... ....i. . ".... Inittdotio ` Om III Or I 1 NMI s ,.Mal '• ) MEI ,`,... .C47;::41:41". 1:11:111:r'''Illillinis'ill:. .'''''., s • Nun!;fi.riddli ::: . ....... . ....,.. ••••• [0'00 oa. i i:i:i.:I,..... 1 r',. 7ilnallini .1.111.12...01 •:•: 0 --'1 .0 0 0 0 0 :.::: WA. iii •h• sba....2.2=.1 : i•0 000 r ,....... .A.IIIII 1.00000 . igingrAgew ," ' •. 11=3=rat=r,. .f.:,.1 .n..., ,-,• 111111.11111 %, d9211110 ;". . .;s, 1 -. ......... -. - ':':i::'• i :::ii:: :.::•:E:.i 1....100°00Fog• ::',.:]4,-:: 1: E 1 , . .,..::.: ,,....,...,:::i: .. ••• r--Towsur•mr :::: 0.00000.• k ‘I ::::::::,............rmil,..-7-__ lASERIE :.. 1 1 •,-..:,0.0• J 7 :„ 3, .. '. ....:......::•:•::::::::*:Frail it. . er4111:11r.IP • 1,,,,, III It .lel 1 000000 •00000• • 000000 •%, • • ', .:•:•:.:.:• in MI ::.:.:&AIN/Any-V •":"0,, e. • .•',,,- ::::i*i:iiii i : . 0.01..• ..::i.. . ..7.1Atril 11111hAmomma .t. .• , .,• • • : . •::.::.:i:::::::. r.::::•:::•••" :.• •:11Preal 4 , , • . • • :- :::::::::::::::: •-...• • •-•:-.-4...1 •- L---A I • 0000 \'. • • -1;• •.:•:.:.:.:.:. •....., ••• o o • • • • • ... ....., i NSW 1E11111E11 .. .-- -• ' , nn , . ,.. • • ' • ::i:i:;i:i . • • • • C,',: .:i:i:i:: ; • • - *::::. .7 I"''A•4511,M1 I MIL rl'CI y.. :0°00°00°00°00ZOZO°00:0°.*.‘ '' 0 • • • • ,.,, • Lu • • IV • ,• .:.::::.:... , .11111 ....0'".",ij. vo..• imst0 - .r.•;•;.• 1 ••••.•••••••••••• •:-:::::::::::•:•:•:-:•:-:•.. • • • • :•. • .n..,. .0., 0 . co • • • • • r,c,, ,A, Weft, ,..,....k_imiso, fp. . • .T .::::::•.:iii :::..'........;.:.;....••141174;1 .._ • • •: • -..••••, 11/4 • •• • • • ::-„, ::::::::::::'..::::::%*i:i:i.ftit.3. ::::::::„.... • 0 • •• • r•3 . . g . :111111L-41111 1 '.::i.:.:.: -::. :i.:.iii::::::.ii.ii.::::.:::;.::ii...0..: i:::im., :. e • • 4 • ••,-,.. % • • • • • ••••?, ' •-• • •. • i • • , • ... • • • • • ..., , N ..... ••••..... • • • • ‘• ,,• „. ... • 4 , 0.... ,.............. ,.. • .. .. , ._-_,• •441V .•••••.-.••••••• ' II--M • ' 0 ,0 0•n0n0o• ::::::::::::::::.:.:•:•'..:.:•:•:•.....:.: IMMO n pa I Z I. .............•• • •to • • / eif.0,,N,•• ..-:•"0-0-0-• .:•••••••••••••••••••••••••'''•••••• suomm•mosi ...._ .. •0•0 0 . imminummi . 1 !fR",i. .;?) -.Y.' a 0 •:•:•::i.•;••••••:'•:'•a. 1...111111 I__.:L!!------•-!- - ."--i' ::::*.::i:i,i*.: rail I 10 . IllnlinEnnI Alio .'1.rrai mor .x...............1 ill im , ''.••••• III AK P .........:•:,.....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.•• .•o o. .m•mm 1.00000.30000000000-0-:•,. ifililinhirdirld iiiii.ii:.:::::7:17:77:::1::::7:::.::::::::-:::.i::1::1::1::Iii..:::;:ii.".MIA 1111111-11-11. ,. :i;i: 7-i ••:.:11. , .,..„ „..:iii:;iiiii:i:::::. :.%:•::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::•.:.:.:::::.:.:00.0 0 I :':i .-='' 8 Of 41,.:i:::ii:iiiii, •.. :i:i*:::::::::::::••, ...:.:.::::i:': .o.o0 000tio_. 1 ::: kb,. Am . ::::.:Ven.. -., ':::::::::::::- ....:::::::::::::::::. 0 0 0 • ...a..0,0_00%0000 0 .i:ii.:iii::::::.:.:.:;.„: 4. ..:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::::.:.....:::::::........ ( "••• ..7::,,,i, jii•,...• 1::::$3:::::•:,,• •,T ...:.:•:•:.:•:•:•:,.................: :•...FW:11117. • •t ".1:::::°::::*f e.l..: . •....:.;.:.:.:.:.::;:..:::.:.:.:.:.:.:.. •0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0..0,...0_0_0_0._.. ::::::::. .•00(D...:..........••; ; ler All 101/4...- '. - ''':;''...)..'''''":'''''..''''L .:: : M.: ii... .°91F0A°11 °0°°0°00.°•°°0°°0°1..4) '41 .:::...:.: e°eV +'.. • ' ,. .. 4-II. In .P12142arr''. ..::::.:.:.:.x.:.:.:":''.:.:.;:': ° o0O000000000,o... N....:..:.• Aussim•NEMIip Iii . ..,.' ..............x.:.:.:.:.:.:':* •°o°0 o o 0 0 o o o 0000000000 00._o_. Ilnillerry ig, ' • .0.0% .•' :i6:.:iiii:i**i:iiii:i :),Do o o o o o o o o ''..°. ?kW 1.:•••••••':::.. , 1111M.,; 0000 • :•:•:•:•:-:•:•:-::::::::•:•:•:• 0000000000000000000 00,. i :.:.::::::::.:.:.:.:.; .):. •0000.000% 1.::,. :.ii:mi:iii•:]:.ii...0..0.0.0.0 0 0 0.0.0.0000.0000 0 : i !.,........::::::::::::::::. .• ,. f•Orri .f.*•:.•••<„, 'I, i., i •00000 E., ::•:•::::::*i:::::::::::.:: - 000000 •:e. 1 ...000.000 e-..• •'.• ;...,‘.,,.‘,..,*.c.'...,.. 0.", . 1 , '''• •:::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :L., .000(3000• ,,.., ...:.......:.•:• . -- I •,../...3,4s1,5,4,..\,,:,., 00000000o ,t; •:•:••::::::.:•:.:•: at .:':. :1::.::i.il.:"Mgr.i,',P,i:.9.i•.,,"..°P.%%°.°''';'Ti ::•::::..::.:::.:::.::::T:•:.:. - - 1,4.1.., r,1 ,.31,1• • AIM"' 3• -•. :o.••••:•• • •:-:•:•:••••••••:•:•:, - ''.,F.P.,:'9• .•-•..••+f,•'.71,P.) ) ....................•• '‘....‘ .,. 7,'I 1.-- - "c:' •',,... .. :', mi -4;ktc,,...,...2;. ... . ,.1.19.i . v• '::..•:,•;.. ...i:''',/,."./5.'.,:;15';c1.9,n,..,•i6;;,•' ::::.:•:•:•:•:•:::::: so ..,..,• ...,..„, .• ‘,.,...,:...5 •,.,,......,....,:,,...„•,..• ., 'V.3•nr::,:',,.r ^ el)';- •.•-..,•0',••Pi:,.:,nj-i<,,,,;..•?,r,:,r, .•.,,, .....:.......:.:.:.: i:r.):•A •zs!l'i.•;.:',-k•.,„4•42 0 2.4,,,,,,.:,.,.-6 s',??,...,.,::.:•!,)?•„(.-''.1",.p..z:?,',s?,,,c,-,--..-..?4,1..0...'..(d ci.7.e,:c• . "••••:•:.:. ,- ... ,',I,. c.,,:<3,', -J ,,,.:.:,•6,;: •••r.r:.:.•:,r,(1.!...c-t,:7,13...c...(e,.1;•..e. Irinita-..0,.<....>?)-.„,„.„,:.'„:8`'..,,,':,???,;:::...:.,51.r.', ,- ••s• - ,(p.;,,,),;;!,,,,,i.,.......'.4,...,-.2,... . . ..,, ...7,;4:\,:,.:14:..?i.,c.,;,&. . . ,,o),..c,)'„' ,, '''.;.';':';'"i'4C-s<•• •-• Nos .-,.;7'fs:-• ---. •'-,F. 1...4.. cr.447;.-.Ci• .:,..i..`?'',,,:,'..,':',"%i`'''/,,Y./'.',2:‘, /i.iiiii 4 •- (..c.:Pq,‘,„.„..„.,.._•„,_ ..,,,...- I .sr- ;•• li'').;.;*fr. 4%.,... let. •',I.?'t*:. ',JAY ' , ..i',." '')';''• hi I.';11,:;:::is.r.):"....;?.-,,' 0.-:.qi.,:, .. , ,..,„,,f...(7,--,4-6s,-:-• Alt. isr .......,,.:,,......,.sie,r,,,‘: .:,,,.,..:•,..4,,.••=... IPPIMMIIII. I . UC;,V• ' .0.'.,•',''::,,.''):•;.\'•i2,?,„:2,.,?.-......:- , :7.,t1;1,,,,":;:,"el ..: ,..4 ''''''• 4 111,4111111VOIP V3'%''C''1)k,1••,- -.. '''.•I'l;elliA" •*;•., .`.,,IP),if.•:'?•:•O''e'..'.''''.'...'.'1•:1'.l'4?...' • :illike.„\ ' 4116 12.----0„-:k-,Q....-Pir<ff-c.,s--••••,Q i-,•.:-..'-- lb 0.Q.,:,:,,,-20.-,.;,i;.•V,,„1.•64-1,:'.•:ey•-•3,i,'.1 e.',1•.<.(!0,.„:1?, '< :.'' ..-' .., , ,,..7.<1.',•‘.....i`C:.:C feii,t.• , •!<•::. - V", "•; ,'i:‘•rz, ifs,-,41,..Xi ,on",.„,, .*•, us ______ .t..:i''Ce;c0.•ekr-,..,T.!. ',.' ,.:1;g7'1,., f,:f$55..h,. ,"';..9. '3,6'.,./.'•'1<'-r-,. ..0.--"0.7.... ,.....cf.,, . ,. ., ,•- .:, ..,. ...„--•,,,..,:- •0000.• 1,,b•;„15'.,,'0 '...'..L1 -•‘.•,.s.<.-".:•:>P; .,,.#";-• • -,, .45,c-..,20, -;,-.(,_1/4.,.;'e.,e,c,•-•-e;clye^.c...."e• III 0 U.0:0°00: :',.,t•os,.<,. .. c';cv,i?).4"' ,y',•<,: ,,, trz._'• ' ...... .,f4, . ••• ••c T,:-,,. 0.'•,.,.•x•''.•41..1.c.'•%tit.rt,cr,te,-;.. •*'•••-•.,;.I'q:-...'.'),„, /'•73;:rs'..t.2.,'53,'•';'-f •,,,r--; .. •..-.0. ..n, ,.,..,-,..,..,1,,ecs.,..,,.0-• :-:,:'..?,-,:'•e '")•o'0r,C.'''''c'S'.(‘)0.. ,3.6'A•",•-••,.1. ......t.I i•‘'ir.,%X••rs • .ct.r.1:1,,e0,x4-.'....,:1-‘,..'ir.'.:{.;::':•f!:•r•.•' i't. :F%..):Se.;• n,./.,•••?',.,S•,?;•':••',.".-.:,••,..3 .:'.;z-;:F.•.(3;_fr.;.• .. r,..,..ocpc; •;.:4.(:•.:(1'...,tti...,0..2.,.a_ az.,.,,.. ,,,,.,,1).,,z. .1, • ,.,..,, . • '''''T:'Y'f..+:;C:fiC..4.' !' - ' "."''''''. •-;r?-p':':,;r:,..,;.?....:,›',A.:',',2.ie.., :'..6f;:'''', a ...2i,.../Ankt.,..0.. 2-..4,.;.•:,'''. ',F..:' 'p,,..,`.r;... ' ,'. c4.1:,..,, •... „,:,.c,•:v.i....), .: -- .7•••'...,Es.,„-.cys-:!:..,4:? .....,..;.',, • --'".:, c•e.,.,:?!.,.,...-t,"..,,o, :.'.:-- •c.,.:,',1.,.-..,c.,,,,,..ip. •:•„,!0 s,'A.•l'r("9 o.,.•,Q..•!..0 i-.c'..••,,,ii-',..,V t.,`".., .i.,.7. Li•il•,,";li :• „tx-{z,er;..e... .0,,.v.0 .,...ibit,.. ',-j.,6",..,IX)P'..;u,`,..*'1. a')t?..e,".b'CD''0,'•'..t...'• ... .4'..Cc'' • 'i J.:C.'''.1..,....,,. .k.. ' ‘) -. -'- '2- -•r•-C.(' • ,.•,•• st,'h3":'''',:1 0-'.',' '• "'•.7.),,;,-, ...,t*?-.0 rc,• .0.••• -°0'ci°•,,.. • ,-re ,,,..:•‘ ,.....2...,,....r,.:,,t 4, .›...„.... :2..,..,(_, ••.,? C... el.• ••%.e •. Le ' ?e,'re:ld t?,1 r., .•.2.l• cz bt?.'.‘!`cl...1•,e, e,'.,`1 Ce b, e" IP :. E;:c.''6•C;ri. t;q4...P-- ,"r''' :•11-4'..:C-c' ''''': / k'•c•,••L,'''.'''''ii:••'-,-40.2.,..)•• -,.,f=„3...t.,1' '-1•.;,,v.,:;• .e ,.- C3.,9',2, C"6‘'•'`'`:'?'.4??',13,...'!i.l'IN ',,' 0 00 . %•,',;:`,..`- . . -,.,.1.:°•Q;;' ,,',•(*?,"':P • -':.•;.k6i. 'q'6 -i.••:.'.••`•>,,l'o;P:•‘::t:7114-Wg.r'...•If' I \ ......‹.....r.„.„.?..,,„..Ey.,•,.:, .-i,.d../...‘„,„..1 ..,\s 0008).00000 , ,.:. ,..;:i::::::::::::::::. . 0000 '''. ' '3;,:0e 090°0°. ",•`',‘ 9°0°0 ' LAND USE ELEMENT ..:.:.: : ;:.:•...,,,,,_. 00.• • ••,:.• •44„ . :.:•:•:•„ -;!..,,,.,..,,,,•„•_•7...,,-,.. .. • I , .:::.,, . --- , ,.6.. r•?.; :• ;•,0•: “...' '•,•e'' . -..... 1‘.. i:* :',. "'"-' • " A ..0.000o.o...h._ .00• . 0.0.• . .,...0.000.9• -,,e ..0.0.00-.. :.: . •0 0• *4 ...0• , Single Family "'Rim' Commercial :.. ,,,.., •. \A ,,',,,-:1 i _._ :,•,;.:„... ,x,..... ,,......,..i _ -:•:•:•:•:•:.:::.:::: Low Density \N \ Office / Office Park •.:.. •Witt, ..t. ,.• :.:.:.:::.:::::.:::: -,. :::::::.:......:.:.:. Multi-Family-,‘ .....:.:.::::::•:•:•: Y 7:'•?:::•iiii:.."6,- ... ..... .. ::::::::::::.:i*:.., .•:„-•?. •• ,. . ::*:•:::.i:::00n0oo000n0o0o.0n000n.0 .....7?.,.. ,•,••,,.)..i..I,/ •.000000000%0..00.00'0 01 0000000000 10 \_ _:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Medium D • .00 000 00 ILy .0..0... • •00000 0000000004C 0 Multi-Family - Public/Quasi-Public .00...0.. .4-0, 1.0000.0 .,.., 1 •::: 6•0•••6 000000• • 1 aiMiiiM High Density Light Industrial "...4./v 1 • .JJn:*;%:::::::::.:iiisi:x Multi-Family ii.::im:::K:ia,.::;•.:: IP I 1•0 11 11 e -.. •n. I -7..4., ! ( 1 II '14 ,..)-,-..'), . .''''. '<'''(:;,l'i;:.i. : 6 • • • • • l', 11). ',3• :' *'''t'-'1;4.':$., .Recreation • • • Heavy. Industrial • •cl--,f,pek .:. . . . •.....t.m, . ......11% , wir,. ----- -_-_-_-_-_- Greenbelt ._-_-_-_-_- Manufacturing Park .. .,••!..,,..:„.z. ,,,,,•• / Multiple Option . .... . CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO (S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle-King County Health Dept. PROJECT NAME: Temporary Modular Office Unit DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years., when new facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3001 N.E. Fourth Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment . An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from December 27 , 1989 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5 : 00 p.m. , January 11, 1990 , in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS . Responsible Official : Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South . Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: DECEMBER 27 , 1989 DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 20, .1989 SIGNATURES/ 4<6nneth E,—Nyberg//�?1re�ter Commun . Devilopment Department Lynn ttmann, Director . Publi W ks Department . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Temporary Modular Office Unit . PROPONENT: Seattle-King County Health Dept. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU-126-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot, modular building next to the existing• Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3001 N.E. Fourth Street RECOMMENDATIONS : The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated. 1 . That the applicant provide a landscaping plan, including plantings designed to be sufficient in type, number and dimension to screen the modular unit, to address aesthetic impacts. This plan should •be subject to the approval of the Landscape Planner in advance of review of the conditional use permit application by the Hearing Examiner. 2 . That the applicant provide a construction plan including: a) erosion control for the construction area and to protect against migration onto adjacent right-of•-way; b) approved construction schedule/hours ; c) approved hauling routes/hours; d) periodic watering down of the site as required to control dust/debris ; and e) a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of $1, 000 . 00 . These plans must be approved by the Public Works Department, the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Note #1: In the event that sanitary sewer improvements are required, permission to connect will need to be obtained from the City Council as the property is in the Heather Downs Moratorium District; all connections are subject to City regulation. • Note #2 : The applicant shall revise the proposed site plan to provide a minimum forty (40) foot separation between the modular unit and the main complex, in order to address land use impacts and Code requirements, with the plan subject to the approval of the Planning Division in advance of review of the conditional use permit application by the Hearing Examiner. Note #3 : All rooftop equipment must be screened according to Zoning Ordinance requirements. Note #4 : At the time of conditional use permit review, staff will recommend that the life of this building be limited to a maximum of two years from the date of occupancy. mmdoc COMMUNITY DEVELOP/ T DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 2LA C I k1J T APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ID. r iZ ►M NX vvi wil or T-wo 1E R.S up p o rt/ /4.sPpt.,I C AC+V`1' uu t L L. ►fib Ac3,sukc C.. o►^-,pL►igr U c 4 w -Ti PA IzKi}vCto d L o N(3),UCQ Gf171 rv$ru C Q O IK T"1,1 11 C w �'t- John DATE) 2- + -n9 SIGNATURE OF D ; TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ;EVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: L....044„ P4-46A APPROVED APPROVED WITH CQNDITIONS NOT APPROVED •�a 's — DATE /-1/7/6 IGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 1. Earth o_.___ _ °_..__._ _ °_.______._._ . 2 . ' Air " ° 3 . Water ° • ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° • 5. Animals ° 6 . Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline- Use ° ° 9 . Housing • • • ° ° 10. Aesthetics • ° ° 11 . Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation 0 l/ 0 0 ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° ° ° ° 16 . Utilities ° 0 COMMENTS : 0 �� Par IC-S , ate vrG � �. .,_.` ;:G�- .._.-,7..,,... ..,._ ;I;'i- /: / l i We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . :...---- i%71.— /,' ---6, - 7 ---Si ature of Director Au Vrized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Z,h 6- APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • • V.,0 / ?e(1- ' -2) • 2 . • c, ( /ic7�::�'7 6 DATE 1 —�� / SIGNATURE O-F�DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Y ' REV. 6/88 COMMUNITY DEVELOPM�"-1 DEPARTMENT ' • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION . DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON DECEMBEFt 11, 1989 . • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1141-r.ek7 IJrw . c' PPT Ll. /1'/ T eE5 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS a 1•IYORRwT IS REC�uiR�� NOT APPROVED NE SITE WiThiN 150 .Pr DV The PROPooEO hteoku,vg, 134iLDINL, PEa Rt�rTrn.l FIRC DEPT• PUN j Do ES HoT S)1ow hN EXi5T1l6 µYD 2h07 Wi-ttN ISO ET" 6F- TrtE JUb3Ecr- inPRG�FME�I-, SEPARAI WPTER. 1)u J is REGaLiREn it -rhE INSTA Lk.A•rian,! of ThG h Dftp,Nr Ftb WGtTER pm-/4 INPRoULfii TS Shkl( 9,E PLR 1ZENTEN ST/-Noy S f"GY1- )&t1 LLD PE[ S eXfr Sl C� Q� C iTY S LITI Li Ti[s • {sTtM D E(DP K6r(1- FvE•S 5HAu, BE PP2L &O iF Cirm-m-iM'- 1 M P Rp U 61'\E r4'rS A{I.Cr Si F`rL�E f ATT At x t9 PEES Sk eer) 161.39) �t�Qorc-� IGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED R DATE 12 - 12- 89 S SENTATIVE REV. 6/88 /17,4, 11,-Et /2-7 P ( REVIEWING DEPARTMENT DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED R)11 AAA 1.4_4..-t-t a 1 "� d�� A G-LL L, jL 4(-/ U tz-Vwt teat- GOLD - 4/ 17 1r-6 Vi e5 med.PAT d DATE 141147 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 tlEh PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: I � �/�n�, - fjL)�� ,5 ' 5 G' APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED I yr c, �-ti al Lj � E Cl DATE J //c/5;)1 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI D REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: S'tpruy\ lt.Da� -� APPROVED !/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED -4 DATE 2/` `,n-/52/g SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 FIRE PREVENTION BUR:- • • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: t tr ueic 1I,\ APPROVEDAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED �y development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and O.rdi- inces. means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved inimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes No ,,"r inary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of /, is uuired. _ _ ---_.__L _._._ hydrannts with a minimum flow of /, _ gpm each required. .'?mery hydrant is required to be within ��__... _____ �.��_/S6 feet of the structure. :,condary hydrants are required to be within; O feet of the ructure. approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes o I fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Ye:y- _ No I fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE _ S /91_9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: V APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED • atkinA U�/►�"� DATE IZI (Iff SIGNATURE OF DIRECT - OR UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 I 329 328 327 / .. 326 I • 32aa5�// I • 324 ) / I / / / I SITE PLAN 323 // / /322 / I I ,� / / 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' I I SCALE : I,��in I:a; J uia;ii lain I:;�ril I �� / - 10' 30' 50' 70' 90' / / / y / / I I/// ( / / / 1 / / DRIVEWAY 7. I"' � CE / / / / f l\ • PARK(N i 0 3ct 120rI / /�W I---315 , I IJ I I I I ~-329 LL TEMPI RARY MODULAR I L I I • : 2 318 I (OFFICE UNIT, 12 x(oO- I i T I Q 1I I f �L---.i KING COUNTYSOUT \\EAST � / CC / I 1 1 \ \ \ ,- 15 0 PUBLIC HHEALTH } / \ ��328 Z \ \� \� \�� _'� CENTER O I ► i z 11 I l i JI / I I PARK NG I I L--�-- --- 317 / I \ , ) / I I — I I DRIVEWAY / I f ( . PROPERTY CORNER� , T�/ I I I I \ \ I 316 ) a o / / / / L I / PROPERTY LINE,TYP. ` __L __� _ / / II 316 317 318 32.0/ 32. _ 3231 Iiii(.,, i_-_--- 12 GC3,1AI/320 322 325 _ 327 328 -----Sze \ i ___IN j :—---i W �.cF / ° RENTON VOCATIONAL k Z. TECHNICAL INSTITUTE 1 Z r`-- v L- i a R=SIDENTIAL I I ELI � � Z Al O I-- L� I 0 1 . \1 ---- 2 n I I — U.III' 1 • • �� IORTHEAST 4 .r STREET % I I I it I �� i ill GAS ST. TION J �" TIRE sTeR il: • 7/7.--/ // 77 r•-_. ' ; I . . . .„......./ PROJECT SITE: �. KING COUNTY r TEMPORARY MODULAR i o OFFICE UNIT, 12x' G0' /''o 5111- 5,E. PUBLIC —� Q �¢ HEALTH CENTER ce � P5l Z ��!Np4t� o 4 / - — r N W lL N Z Q — 1-- KING COUNTY } ROAD DISTRICT I . NO. 2 SHOPS D GRAVEL PIT ; O GRAVEL PIT , v z Y . .// ,. . . • RENTON CORPORA E LIMIT N VICINITY MAP A • w iA►� • SCALE ; I 200'-0', `•r. N/ 5 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 510 67 Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers RENTON HEARING EXAMINER are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six RENTON, WASHINGTON ° public hearing will be held by the months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King meeting in the council chambers on the County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal second floor of city hall, Renton, Washing- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ton, on February 27, 1990 eti n at 9 00 a.m. to tioKing County. co followingnsider the Temporary Modular Office Unit Seattle-King County Health Department The notice in the exact form attached, waspublished in the Kent Edition ECF;Request est f 90 for a conditional use permit for , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in a temporary modular office building. The supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers proposed project would be located at 3001 duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a Public Notice N.E. Fourth Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community (Hearing) R 3 9 8 6 Development Department. All interested persons to said petitions are invited to be present at the public hear- was published on Feb . 16 , 1990 ing on February 27, 1990 at 9:00 a.m. to express their opinions. Published in the Valley Daily News Feb- ruary 16, 1990. R3986 Acct. #51067 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 19 .9 5 Subscribed and sworn before me this 16 t h day of F c b. 19 N,coKry Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING'EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON FEBRUARY 27, 1990 AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEAT[LE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ECF;CU-126-89 Request for a conditional use permit for a temporary modular office building. The proposed project would be located at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Community Development Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID. PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 27, 1990 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. Published: February 16, 1990 Account #51067 OF RED 5, U ® z Le- Ilk •0 09ltep SEPT City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will.hold a HEARING PUBLIC in CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY. HALL ON FEBRUARY 27, 1990 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. ' P.M. CONCERNING: • TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEA FILE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT • ECF;CU-126-89 • Request for a conditional use permit for a temporary modular office building. -�� ��' •' RENTON VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE y 6 IQ hF Q . • ' R v o 0 ----x m YUf W oID — J a Q NORTHEAST 4T. STREET • STATION J IRE STORE / I `� -PROJECT SITE: ----• T RING CBVNTY TEMPORARY MODULAR b O OFFICE UNIT,12'Y 60' • E 5.E.PUBLIC � • HEALTI-I CENTER K . ' z - N I ' K F KING COUNTY i ROAD OISTRIcT N 0.2 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: Property located at 3001 N.E.Fourth Street. , FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON • BUILDING&ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE .REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER- AUTHORIZATION • • • CERTIFICATIONS i I , LJERRf LI/OD , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 11-415CE C s ) COPIES OF ' THE ABOVE -DOCUMENT WERE .POSTED BY ME IN t-1741M CO CONSPICUOUS I PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY' ON bj, 14, i qo ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a 5 • Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington • residing in (= tJio✓ , on the ic'uz SIGNED : day of FC,s6, 0 OF R4,� A a, O U t$ ® .Z.0 rn al illir I C E 09•0 09gT6-D SEPT ' City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner will . hold a PUBLIC HEARING In CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL ON FEBRUARY 27 , 1990 BEGINNING AT 9 : 00 A.M. _ P.M. CONCERNING: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ECF;CU-126-89 Request for a conditional use permit for a temporary modular office building. O ---c �b�y . E4 NTON VOCATIONAL ____u _ , W? TECHNICAL INSTITUT E Z 111] . •HF-- a _O ;2 - 3z w -/ _� h ----z- a r- .I uLL E Pi= cii ; NORTHEAST 4T" STREET �7 i �I' I - 7S7AT ION----i j I IOR / /�- , TIRE STORE I _ I r u , .---7/ _ -PROJECT SITE: KING CduNTY I TEMPORARY MODULAR. E•( 1 Ir 1, o OFFICE UNIT,I2'x 60' E S.E. PUBLIC o �, HEALTH CENTER • rc Z 0 . • r N • d m LL N Z K I- i ICING COUNTY lI } i ROAD DISTRICT Z _ NO.2 SHOP. 3ENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: • Property located at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 PHIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION %• ~`- CITY OF R,ENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division February 13, 1990 Mr. Paul Murakami Seattle-King County Health Department Southeast Public Health Center 3001 N.E. 4th Street Renton, Washington 98056 Subject: Temporary Office Modular Unit 3001 N.E. 4th Street File No.'s ECF;CU-126-89 Dear Mr. Murakami: I have had the opportunity to review the landscaping Plan submitted to our office on February 8, 1990, for the above referenced Conditional Use Permit application, and my comments in regards to this plan are as follows: 1. The plan received is a Super K reduction drawing. Because this Conditional Use Permit is a public hearing, we will need full size drawings of the landscaping plan as well for exhibits to present at this hearing. Please provide four (4) blue print drawings of the landscaping plan for our files. 2. The landscaping plan will need to provide some additional detail. The plan illustrates that two deciduous trees are proposed. What species/variety are these trees to be? 3. The trees proposed (fir trees and deciduous trees) seem rather small in size. An increase in the planting size of these trees is suggested to 8-10 feet in height. In addition, the trees on the reduction drawing appear to be located very close to the modular building. In order for these'trees to branch out properly and to avoid possible damage to the building, the trees should be located further back. 4. Provide shrubbery landscaping along the east and south sides of the building in addition to the other two sides. The shrubbery proposed may be sparse where illustrated and may need some additional plants to fill in. Its difficult to determine their actual spacing at the reduced scale drawing provided. Please provide this requested information at your earliest convenience in order for us to continue with our processing of the conditional use permit. Sincerely, Jerry F. Lind Land Use Inspector/Landscape Planner JFL:murakami:dskl l 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (206) 235-2513 • µt CITY OF RENTON THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Earl Clymer, Mayor February 8, 1990 Mr. Paul Murakami District Administrator Seattle-King County Health Dept. Southeast Public Health Center 3001 N.E. 4th St. Renton, Washington 98056 RE: Seattle-King County Dept. Temporary Modular Office Unit ECF; CU-126-89 3001 N.E. Fourth Street Dear: Mr. Murakami: - This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 26, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman of the Current Planning Division, Community Development Department, at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Sincerely, '. _1 Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:wr cc: King County Facilities Management 6 'g) 320 King County Administration Bldg. s li 500 Fourth Avenue ts. • Seattle, WA 98104 4111)) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2586 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following of Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicantt has dcompleteder thetrity ao mitigation the process: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ECF; CU-126-89 Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, ,are ready for occupancy. The proposed project would be located at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5 : 00 PM on February 26, 199,a . Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: February 12 , 1990 Account: 51067 N OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPLICATION NO. ECF ; CU-126-89 PROPOSED ACTION Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be 'a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for admin- istrative activities and public service.: The unit is planned to be removed in two; years , when facilities , currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS Located at 3001 N.E Fourth Street POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ( E. R.C. HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES7DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FIWILL 11tWILL NOT BE REQUIRED. TH.E CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15. DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 . P. M., February 26 . 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • OT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY DEALT!! DEPARTMENT APPLICATION NO.ECF:CU-126-89 PROPOSED ACTION Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for admin- istrative activities and public service.; The unit is planned to be removed in two: years, when facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are. ready for occupancy. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS Located at 3001 N.E Fourth Street POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00. P.M. • Fehrua v 6. 1990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT `REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATION I , t �� L � rv� HEREBY CERTIFY THAT J1-1 3 ) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN � �R C3 CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON ` �gUf " 81 . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a 1/ • iV Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in—Q -w'TObt-) on the g(A, SIGNED : day of VLI& v C i „ 04e. 44. . Z CITY OF RENTON .41 THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL Earl Clymer, Mayor February 8, 1990 Mr. Paul Murakami District Administrator Seattle-King County Health Dept. Southeast Public Health Center 3001 N.E. 4th.St. Renton, Washington 98056 RE: Seattle-King.County Dept. Temporary Modular Office Unit ECF; CU-126-89 3001 N.E. Fourth Street Dear: Mr. Murakami: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No comments were received. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on February 26, 1990. Any appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman of the Current Planning Division, Community Development Department, at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, Sincerely, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:wr cc: King County Facilities Management 320 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2586 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 510 6 7 Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION VALLEY DAILY NEWS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Renton, Washington • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers ject under the authority of the Renton are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Municipal Code. The following Applicant months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published has completed a mitigation process. TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE JNIT in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King SEATTLE-KING COUNTY County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal HEALTH DEPARTMENT newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for FCF; CU-126-69 Request for a conditional use permit to King County. site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building i i s The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition proposed to be a temporary use,to ps , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in additional office/conference space to allow supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers more efficient use of space for administra- tive activities and public service.The unit is during the below stated period. The annexed notice a Pub 1 i r Not i ce planned to be removed in two years, when facilities, currently being developed in the (Environmental Determination) R 97Q Kent-Auburn Valley, arereadyforoccupan- cy. The proposed project would be located Feb . 12 1990 at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. was published on ' For further information regarding this action is available in the Community Devel- opment Department, Current Planning Divi- sion, Municipal Building, Renton,Washing- The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the ton, 235-2550. This Determination is sum of$ 33 __2 5 FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which willeap ea o�his decisions may be uary 26, 1990. Any appl made to the City's Hearing Examiner, MuniRental Budg, 2 Suth, �> �)a J/7._I�A) � oncip, Washingtonil in .00 AnMill appealAvenue must o state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompa- nied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Subscribed and sworn before me this 12 thday of Feb ._19 90 Published in the Valley Daily News on February 12, 1990. Acct. 51067. R3970 No Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant has completed a mitigation process: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ECF; CU-126-89 Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. The proposed project would be located at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Current Planning Division, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 PM on February 26, 1990. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: February 12 , 1990 Account: 51067 mETRCJ Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 PLANNING DIVISION January 10, 1990 CflYOFRENTON JAN 1 1 1990 Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Nonsignificance File No. : ECF-126-89 Temporary Modular Office Unit Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to water quality or to Metro' s wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, "54 Gregory M. Bush, anager Environmental Planning Division GMB:p1g3332 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 5106 7 Lynn Rainey ,being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the VALLEY DAILY NEWS • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers ENVIRONMENTAL are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six REVIEW COMMITTEE monthsprior to the date ofpublication referred to, printed andpublished RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- newspaper order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for pro- ject under the authority of the Renton by pe g Municipal Code. King County. TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition ECF; CU-126-89 , Renton Edition XX , Auburn Edition , (and not in Request for a conditional use permit to supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers site a 720 square foot modular Debupartment during the below stated period. The annexed notice a P„h 1 i r Nnt i rP nextllnto inne existingG-1 Health Department building a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use,to provide (Environmental Determination) R3892 additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administra- tive activities and public service.The unit is was published on Dec . 27 , 1989 planned to be removed in two years, when facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupan- cy. The proposed project will be located at The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. sum of$ 33 .2 5 This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., January 11, 1990 will not be considered. A _ fourteen (14) day appeal period will com- mence following the finalization of DNS-M. / got 6Q,��p.(, The mitigation measures imposed by the 0 City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Current Planning Division of the Community Devel- Subscribed and sworn before me this 2 7 th day of Dec ' 19 89 opment Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Published in the Valley Daily News December 27, 1989 R3892 Acct. #51067 t . Notary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN 487 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ECF; CU-126-89 Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. The proposed project would be located at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , January 11, 1990 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Current Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Published: December 27, 1989 • ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF; CU-126-89 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION SEATTLE—KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO SITE A 720 SQUARE FOOT MODULAR BUILDING NEXT TO THE EXISTING HEALTH DEPARTMENT BUILDING IN A G-1 ZONE. THE BUILDING IS,-PROPOSED TO BE A TEMPORARY USE, TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL OFFICE/CONFERENCE SPACE TO ALLOW MORE EFFICIENT USE OF SPACE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICE. THE UNIT IS PLANNED TO BE REMOVED IN TWO YEARS, WHEN NEW FACILITIES, CURRENTLY BEING DEVELOPED IN THE KENT—AUBURN VALLEY, ARE READY FOR OCCUPANCY. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 4444 N.E. SUNSET BOULEVARD POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E.R.C.] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1-TWILL (WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR ,15 DAYS FROM. THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JANUARY 11, 1990 AN APPEAL OF. TH.E ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE 'CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION — 1.t—K7-1-r 1 cV1—ty IVI 6. 1 , i) �) _. LI ND , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I N� (43) COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 4-1 6 (..3 ) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY'. ON IJ�(�, Z84 Idf l ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a • Notary Public, in and for the Slate of Washington • residing inCRE1UT-Dij , on the Ztrat SIGNED : . _- day of(� i 1g _ �`l/V`" � V NOTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF; CU-126-89 APPLICATION NO. PROPOSED ACTION SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO SITE A 720 SQUARE FOOT MODULAR BUILDING NEXT TO THE EXISTING HEALTH DEPARTMENT BUILDING IN A G-1 ZONE. THE BUILDING IS PROPOSED TO BE A TEMPORARY USE, TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL OFFICE/CONFERENCE SPACE TO ALLOW MORE EFFICIENT USE OF SPACE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICE. THE UNIT IS PLANNED TO BE REMOVED IN TWO YEARS, WHEN NEW FACILITIES, CURRENTLY BEING DEVELOPED IN THE KENT-AUBURN VALLEY, ARE READY FOR OCCUPANCY. GENERAL LOCATION AND OR ADDRESS 4444 N. E. SUNSET BOULEVARD POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE [ E. R.C. ] HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION ❑DOES NDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DWILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JANUARY 11, 1990 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION / £�b CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 7'4,4f,, Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division December 27 , 1989 Mr. Paul Murakami District Administrator Seattle-King County Health Dept. Southeast Public Health Center 3001 N.E. 4th Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Seattle-King County Health Dept. Temporary Modular Office Unit ECF; CU-126-89 3001 N.E. Fourth Street Dear Mr. Murakami: This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on December 20, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a landscaping plan, including plantings designed to be sufficient in type, number and dimension to screen the modular unit, to address aesthetic impacts. This plan should be subject to the approval of the Landscape Planner in advance of review of the conditional use permit application by the Hearing Examiner. 2 . That the applicant provide a construction plan including: a) erosion control for the construction area -and to protect against migration onto adjacent right-of-way; b) approved construction schedule/hours; c) approved hauling routes/hours; d) periodic watering down of the site as required to control dust/debris; and e) a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of $1, 000. 00. These plans must be approved by the Public Works Department, the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Note #1: In the event that sanitary sewer improvements are required, permission to connect will need to be obtained from the City Council as the property is in 'the Heather Downs Moratorium District; all connections are subject to City regulation. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 rMr. Paul Murakami December 27 , 1989 Page 2 Note #2 : The applicant shall revise the proposed site plan to provide a minimum forty (40) foot separation between the modular unit and the main complex, in order to address land use impacts and Code requirements, with the plan subject to the approval of the Planning Division in advance of review of the conditional use permit application by the Hearing Examiner. Note #3 : All rooftop equipment must be screened according to Zoning Ordinance requirements. Note #4 : At the time of conditional use permit review, staff will recommend that the life of this building be limited to a maximum of two years from the date of occupancy. Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals (including the applicant) who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end January 11, 1989 Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements recommended for this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above please call Jeanette Samek-McKague of our office at 235-2550 . S ' rel Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:dm // Mr. Paul Murakami December 27 , 1989 s Page 3 cc: King County Facilities Management 320 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 • I. TON.:.:::>��>;���`�� ��> <- �> ���' �� ���� � ������ �>: }: ::�CURREN7' ::::. O:i D:I, �:I:O �' :>:#:: ::: :# :> :`:: � � ���: i::.*i` .. . ... . ..... .... >PLANNTNC bTVYSYON .>::� ::::::.�.�::::::. ::::.::.>:•>::.; .>:. I wAFFIDAV .TA O F.::SEABTCE::z:::BYY:::.:MAY LING ::.::::•:>:.::•::•::<•::.;:<.:::•:;.::.::•>:•>::•:::;:; On the Z7 . day of . .1:lt,curn y , 1961 , I deposited, in the mails of the United States` a .s'ep�. .l..{{ed . envelope containing M � S av ct c �.cicIvi s documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing t 4wU ( - . (Signature of Sender) Subscribed and sworn to me this •7 day of D /..<<___,'J ,� , 19750, . , Not �- 1.0q P����0(2, ry Public in and for the Stat f Washington residing at - 10"7 1 , therein. • Project;::Name:::.: :: ...::, :•. ::: ;:.:<:.:.:::: ::: ;: ;;:.(::;•:;:: ::.:;;.: .. ::• ::. t I . o..r t Pro7ect _Numb.er:::::�. :_: .. .1: . .: . .: >:..:.:.> ..:..:.::.:�.:: .� .:;.: : ...: .. :.:: ::...:�:i .:�:::::::<:�:�.:»:::::::: :>:: 1 %o ;s CITY OF RENTON " F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division December 27, 1989 • Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental,Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations and Environmental Checklists for those projects reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee on December 13 and December 20, 1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED SUNSET PARK PHASE II ECF; SHPL; R; SA-100-89 Applicant seeks to 1) subdivide a 1.44 acre property into two parcels; 2) rezone Lot #1 from B-1 to R-3; 3) rezone Lot #2 from B-1 (restricted) to B-1 (unrestricted); 4) obtain specific site plan approval for a 20 unit multi-family residential complex for Lot #1; and 5) obtain a conceptual site plan approval for commercial development for Lot #2. The project is located at 4444 N.E. Sunset Boulevard. SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. - TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT ECF; CU-126-89 Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when new facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. The project is located at 3001 N.E. Fourth Street. The fifteen (15) day comment period for Sunset Park Phase II will end on January 4, 1990 and the fifteen (15) day comment period for the Temporary Modular Office Unit will end on January 11, 1990. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 • Environmental Determine December 27, 1989 Page 2 DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE GENE COULON BEACH PARK BOAT SIGNAGE ECF; SM-124-89 Application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to allow the placement of two (2) 4' by 8' bulletin boards at Gene Coulon Beach Park. One board location is the boat launch dock and the other is at the boat rental dock. The Park is located at 1201 Lake Washington Boulevard North. CITY OF RENTON STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE ECF-133-89 Application for the maintenance of storm sewer lines using insituform, a special fabric tubing with a resin, inserted into existing lines. This is similar to inserting another line within the existing line. Located in Bronson Way N. right of way between the Cedar River and Factory Avenue N. and in the Houser Way N. right of way between the Cedar River and the intersection of Factory Avenue N. The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 10, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Sincerely, " /- Do . Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James Lutz, Department of Transportation CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle-King County Health Dept. PROJECT NAME: Temporary Modular Office Unit DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when new facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3001 N.E. Fourth Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Current Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) : Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from December 27, 1989. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , January 11, 1990, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Current Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: DECEMBER 27, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 20, .1989 SIGNATURES: , ? -2- ..mac-c-=• 4<trineth E..—Nyberc reGtar Communify_DevgTpment Department X--- Lynn ttmann, Director Publ .W ks Department l . DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Temporary Modular Office Unit PROPONENT: Seattle-King County Health Dept. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: CU-126-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. The building is proposed to be a temporary use, to provide additional office/conference space to allow more efficient use of space for administrative activities and public service. The unit is planned to be removed in two years, when facilities, currently being developed in the Kent-Auburn Valley, are ready for occupancy. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 3001 N.E. Fourth Street RECOMMENDATIONS: The Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated. 1. That the applicant provide a landscaping plan, including plantings designed to be sufficient in type, number and dimension to screen the modular unit, to address aesthetic impacts. This plan should be subject to the approval of the Landscape Planner in advance of review of the conditional use permit application by the Hearing Examiner. 2 . That the applicant provide a construction plan including: a) erosion control for the construction area and to protect against migration onto adjacent right-of-way; b) approved construction schedule/hours; c) approved hauling routes/hours; d) periodic watering down of the site as required to control dust/debris; and e) a cash bond for street clean-up in the amount of $1, 000.00. These plans must be approved by the Public Works Department, the Fire Prevention Bureau and the Police Department in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. Note #1: In the event that sanitary sewer improvements are required, permission to connect will need to be obtained from the City Council as the property is in the Heather Downs Moratorium District; all connections are subject to City regulation. Note #2 : The applicant shall revise the proposed site plan to provide a minimum forty (40) foot separation between the modular unit and the main complex, in order to address land use impacts and Code requirements, with the plan subject to the approval of the Planning Division in advance of review of the conditional use permit application by the Hearing Examiner. Note #3 : All rooftop equipment must be screened according to Zoning Ordinance requirements. Note #4 : At the time of conditional use permit review, staff will recommend that the life of this building be limited to a maximum of two years from the date of occupancy. mmdoc r _ r 1 0 Dee c)4 444ps/pro RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 41', �� 65 ti ° ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET149 44 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: HiRuker:Pi-atv-wilBSI: DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 1989 EFC - 126 - 89 PUNNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 DEC 41989 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT RECEIVE:* BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street SITE AREA: 4. 8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics g ° 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation ° ° . 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: I EMrcgtillti So I VD I I, L"AJE 1.14 V.A,41 O * at, Lo .(&Ea 114.434 elgP1Ecldt• "C S 1 )C-iu 6,04000:0 as SGR.ea eb (t)aml is.PPraeltikcE bScA4P6.i&. RP:44PS SGR.E3L i0G CouC.A fit' Desi6Oett TD l TYft pd axibcr2 ""4404< /SlL lG Ai i. �,r"'�,i2 m 'flrMADS &)i tD II.)(, IS. Zen"tie . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Aft At ild* IL/7/ Signature of irector or Authorized Representative Date f Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health. Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION I FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE . LONG RANGE ' PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON bECEMBER 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1/04 KA-4Le. " 1 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CQNDITIONS'� NOT APPROVED /1 •La.. DATE /7/TAS SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 ti RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4,4, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: cu. r X1� 1P6ANALJA1a t9 } DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 198"'4 EFC - 126 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone: LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street SITE AREA: 4 .8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR ' . MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° ° o ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7. Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 121.11eltC51 e" T-t r o°t9t-Ntt ►olk-,h1frucP 13 L c..ockieh 1-o rc- ' Th C sT cJF' Me t'(ts'CI ruCp tau iutae cp We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impactor areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. .1, 4 , ►22.-tl-�� Signature of Dior or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION • TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: PLA k Iitu4 - CU EiU 'APPROVED )( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED - r ` R_. l4 vvvaxt vtitotm ' O' 1-1.00 FINKS cep pO ) OC:C.v pivvc-f , i,.cppILIC.J4401' WILL Nitt.10 1-C) F Su►Z . COvip(.muc c. LL.l7Y -r►iE PAcItK► V(q e, 144(3wCQ oko►w uccc, ►-0K .riie 1 J ) ;7 DATE �- - 1 !: •SIGNATURE OF D . TOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 i RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT :',711,41t ok o ille ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET Dee '41' °4' REVIEWING-DEPARTMENT: 9-1.re_. VP rcnmI% • t° 9 DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4, 1989 COMMENTS DUE�t ' r r r11, ('"•. DECEMBER 1 {k_,t1 , , i EFC - 126 - 89' f .` _. _. �J APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89' PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH' DEPARTMENT I.®:CIS 4 16a) PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT '' -. 4,,, • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site. a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health, Department building in a G-1 zone. 1 LOCATION: 3001 .N.E. 4th Street SITE. AREA: 4 .8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR . MAJOR INFORMATION ' IMPACT ' IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° r 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4. Plants • ° ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° 0 6. - Energy & Natural -Resources ° ° 7., Environmental ' Health ° ° ` 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 0 ° o ° ° 9. Housing ° _ ° ° ° 10.. Aesthetics ° ° o ° ° - • 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation' ° o ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation • ° ° 0- - 0 - - _ -_0 14 . Transportation - - ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° • ° ° 16. Utilities � ° COMMENTS: • \ , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas • in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional' information is needed to properly assess this proposal./6(4.44:-- 146. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6488. RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co; Health Department • PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU • POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989. • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 401 9.tv U � O,, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- na nces. A means of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes �! No ,urinary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of /, &ern is required. __..- __. / ._. --_ hydrants with a minimum flow of /, d gpm each is required. 1 Prgrary hydrant is required to be within rt:. _ . /5-O . feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within -e feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes JO All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes g. No All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE 4G. /?1,9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 A RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT C�Op 4 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET Dec © i�.O4, b -- REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �oA���- � Z98h1' b DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 1986` ;�j+ EFC - 126 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th. Street SITE AREA: 4 . 8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE- MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° o 2 . Air ' - 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° O ° O 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o o ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° o 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° O O o 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services � � ° o o ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: I ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 6/ A4/.? 1211(1c1 Signature of Director o Auth rized Representative Date Rev-. 6/8 8 � r RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: i11C EW �G APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE IZI1(1G'SIGNATURE OF DIRECT ORrnifUtiVtk UTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST11 REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S vbv\. (Jr.1Z. . DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 1989 EFC - 126 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street SITE AREA: 4. 8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth o • ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ✓ ° 4 . Plants • ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 0 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 0 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services 0 ° ° O 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: l L Roo ' drGhn,s will heel 112 J� I ( 0- 14 L0 /76-4"'Oil $#et Ga I has 1'4 • We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. . ;, o 4 tv eh, 4 i. ,2/1 09 Signature of Director or Authorized rued Representative ) Date j Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: / Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: . S"t"p \ la.7at APPROVED 1/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 4 /If'4/LOG DATE /2MM SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 LG RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET acf;,e2,719 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: •,e'e 5 � ►py� k. F,_ DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMB1 , 1989 EFC - 126 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street SITE AREA: 4 . 8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air 3 . Water ' ° ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing_ ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: JLo �r��S�,n,-� � lob � ,.L� +6 ( . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or AuthOtized RepreseWt tine Date r�� Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a ,G-1 Zone. , LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION fe TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 7 Pa,1,-FD APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED NO I i' D- s V)G, �rl a lTL�z h� p aG.L _( cDATE J /r SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORI D REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Wgrte..�r (tics v DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 1989 EFC - 126 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street SITE AREA: 4. 8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT ' IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: Ire fa" (046KR O1N I`11-c41EO uEw 17"C1 - APPUsc o'n ttri ) j2Eoiew $N Efrr fFES Sway . We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ".V /2-/Z- �9 Signature of Director or Authorized Rep ntative Date C Rev. 6/8: RENTOLA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th• Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION• BUREAU . POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION . DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: `'1/Q7- � [ C� PPry. /116-Air(Peas) APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED A H`fORP i i RE4uiRF9 WiTNiN 150 .FT OF ThE PRopose0 1180 itikR. LtiLDIN6,,PER ReWToui FIRE toEPT '�11E SITE PLAN+ Doe!. Nat S►1ow hN EX ireig6 DRANT w,nt I ISO PT 6- me simnel- IMpRpg6ME►iT, A SEPARATE WATER 'PLArl 13 RFatdcleo Fug ME ItaSTAU.Ario)1 OF -fhb hYmRANT: ?itt WPereR. PLAN.' imPRo*Peen S?hMt. PIE PLR RE-Nam.1 SThrdWS fell- Kb Peti EKTEr►Sio*J C CPMS Lcrit'i7ie3. ”sstM MELOttEter feES SMALL. 6E ?PPLit-D IF W7ll'E`Q.NAi*1 jMFRpu6MEr+'rs Ata& INST}ru60 (5 ee . ATrrchErj fe c s i err) liq.89 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZE �� ' DATE 12"" 12-$q R SENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • FEE APPLICATION: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIE AEET I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET E1 PLAN REVIEW ROUTING SLIP OTHER DATE: Pcc Iz, 19$, APPLICANT: ettiTte leN6 Co• Hi.Tt, Depr JOB ADDRESS: 3oa I - me 4t►+ sr NATURE OF WORK: TeHPoRARR MOOtWAR. oFFi'cc Wisrr 11 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT DATE RECEIVED Comments Due BY PROPERTY MGMT. Comments or suggestions regarding this application should be provided in writing. Please provide comments to the Comm. Dev. Dept. (C.D.D.) by 5:00 p.m. on above date. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION pRoPERTf MANAaftevr FEES APPLIED LAru CANNOT APPLY FEES ►z, LEGAL DESCRIPTION NEED MORE INFORMATION OISQUARE FOOTAGE C3I FRONT FOOTAGE I VICINITY MAP It is the intent of this development fee analysis to put the developer/owner on notice, that the fees quoted below will apply to the subject site upon development of the property. All quoted fees are due and payable at the time the construction permit is issued to install the on-site and off-site improvements (i .e. underground utilities, street improvements, etc.) PROJECT COST LATECOMER LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WATER NO PER. L.g FTG. FEE CITY HELD W- 193 • 6.25 LANNof 66 CONVuTFD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD Rcaeu:ltc FRONT FOOTA6E LATECOMERS AGREEMENT - SEWER CITY HELD PRIVATE DEVELOPER HELD SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - WATER UNITS SUCC FEE Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, Cnndn_: eaCA mAlt .tex uni $1751ea. unit x CCommercial/Industrial $.04/sq. ft. of property x 0.04/F0- SPECIAL UTILITY CONNECTION CHARGE - SEWER it w E &mie ta co Lei- Single family residential dwelling unit $300/lot x Apartment, condo, each multiplex unit $175/e Commercial/Industria($.04/sq.ft. of property x N/A if 61176 SEw' is 13K g 6641 0 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Hospital Area) WATER UNITS SAD FEE DEVELOPMENTS WITH 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS OR LESS: Area Charge $0.034 per sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $16.00 per front ft. x DEVELOPMENTS WITH GREATER THAN 1500 GPM FIRE FLOWS: Area Charge $0.048 per sq.ft. x Frontage Charge $18.00 per front ft. x SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1 Honey Crk. Intercptr) - SEWER UNITS SAD FEE AREA CHARGES: Residential dwelling units, apartments or equivalents; $250 per dwelling unit x Commercial development: $.05 per sq.ft. of gross site area x FRONT FOOTAGE CHARGES: $37.19 per Front Ft. (on ea. side) x $74.38 per fr.ft. (prpty .on both sides of imprv.) x TOTAL: $ The above quoted fees do NOT include .inspection fees, side sewer permits, r/w permit fees or the cost of water meters. katt,0?-, � t I i/ 4� �X DATE 12-12—$9 Signature of Director o 'uthorized Represe ative RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Sewer U W& DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4 , , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 1989 EFC - 126 - 89 APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street SITE AREA: 4 . 8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION . IMPACT. IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth °_� ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water 7C ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities COMMENTS: I 3,4cLirLy ' ( 3r-A.u,�Tco We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 07 i„.K.,/ Pig t4ittleg Signa re of Director or Authorized Representative, Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1 , BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: , �}ca � u-t( APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS x NOT APPROVED OR)L1 � �M i on Gr�c-� br A -E 4e1 1r savu.wt ,4Tioxr /DATE 14 /gl?' ' SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ParkS a r_rc.a-4 l0v, DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4 , 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 1989 EFC - 126 - 89 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 DEC - 7 1989 PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT A!9� ) PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT BRIEF- DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4-Eh Street SITE AREA: 4 . 8 -Acres • BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE - MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT . IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° J 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° " ° o ° ° - 9. Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o 0 ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 12 . Recreation ° t, ° ° 13 . Historic &e Cultural Preservation 0 ° ° ° ° 14 . Transportation • ° o O ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities ' ° r COMMENTS: kS � �� M i v i�.-(_c5,}'1. it^.%'t.r?,,-1 -t iv. , , 2 rGti r-�" ✓C� 7�/iL'c liiG v! / Fr VVV We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas wher additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal i r. , - -- .�//� ���.I._ /_ — ; - A,,- --''Si ature of Director -or Authorized Representative Date ! Rev. 6/88 i RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ®�� oFIt 4'7*o�� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 0,,4,9 ) REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: E5CAiL411 '-i,,t ,,,Z DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 4, 1989 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 11, 198940 EFC - 126 - 89 'I L, "- ---,a. - APPLICATION NO(S) : CU-126-89 I . lV, i fk Vr L5 , PROPONENT: SEATTLE-KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT , DEC 4 1989 j PROJECT TITLE: TEMPORARY MODULAR OFFICE UNIT " L51D: ,:a DMS`CM BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for a conditiona ,,.use_pea i ..-.to- i a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department building in a G-1 'zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street r SITE AREA: 4 . 8 Acres BUILDING AREA (gross) : 720 square feet IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR - INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° o ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° , 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° • ° ° o ° ° 9 . Housing 7 ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ( ° 11. Light & Glare ,,, ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° o ° O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: / We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where., dditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. `,ter ,-- /2 - 2 — Signatu e of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-126-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :CU-126-89 PROPONENT: Seattle King Co. Health Department PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Modular Office Unit BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Request for conditional use permit to site a 720 square foot modular building next to the existing Health Department Building in a G-1 Zone. LOCATION: 3001 N.E. 4th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: 12/15/89 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION . FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED > APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 6;;2 a—� DATE SIGNATURE DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 . t: F0;: CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division December 4, 1989 • Paul Murakami District Administrator Seattle-King County Health Department Southeast Public Health Center 3001 N.E. 4th Renton, Washington 98056 Re: Temporary Modular Office Unit ECF; CU-126-89 . 3001 N.E. 4th Dear Mr. Murakami: The Community Development Department has formally. accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Advisory Committee on December 15, 1989. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Lenora Blauman, project manager for this project, at 235-2550. Sincerely, p c\,( cattp-\_, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/LB:dm • cc: King County Facilities Management 320 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 'WOG DiV S ON CITY OF RENTON Z/j I_ DEC l 1989 �x c o►� 2(e- ck7A-w pc�, 5 (v1,— ✓G . . , ¢70a CITY OF RENTON BUILDING DEPARTMENT INSPECTION RECORD INSPECTOR ID REQUEST DATE A.M. INSPECTION DATE P.M.ADDRESS PERM NUMBER CONTRACTOR INSPECTION TYPE OWNER COMMENTS FORM #114 (4-26-84) \ • King County Facilities, Project Management 320 King County Administration Building / f TRANIBMIT'TAL LEVER Seattle,Washington 98104 / N' `DATE: ri Cv .3C�4 t 1 p e9 TO: S a D [-I C'cd-37. av PROJECT: S g ea-. D PST, (-1-Ce— 1L l(-1 Cdru-D SUBJECT BQ .rS(i 1.4.6.4 L (+-L AA 11Q,4S ATTENTION: iA'P-- PAUL, /+N vjLA pC I We are sending you the following materiel herewith under separate cover by messenger • No.of Copies Date Description Li ) ul ( o (A-Tc toffs [..( FA a P--I.l "JAI. w 1.-(G D i,— 5) • Remarks: • 7;!ING DIVISION OF RENTON 17' 1.-1,f DEC 1 1989 G 0 • • These are transmitted as checked below: Approved Returned for Corrections For Your Information '4 For Your File As Requested For Approval cc: BY: 441/417.33-Nit-A, 2-22-95 0 City of Seattle King County Charles Royer,Mayor Tim Hill,Executive Seattle-King County Depariment of Public Health Bud Nicola,M.D.,M.H.SA.,Director November 27, 1989 PLANNIN0 DIVISION Lenora Bl auman, Sr. Planner CITY OF REN(TON City Of Renton Planning Division NOV g 1��� 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, Washington 98055 RECE V D RE: Conditional Use Permit Application Clarification Of Information Dear Lenora: Following our conversation 11/22, please reference our initial letter dated 10/24/89 (submitted with the application) regarding parking and traffic impact. As noted in the letter, parking and traffic will not be altered with the addition of this unit. The unit is intended for staff meetings during normal business hours. The present conference room in the main building will be converted to exam rooms for use during the two years it is anticipated to take to construct a new facility near Valley Medical Center. The increase in exam room space will allow us to facilitate cur- rent patient flow and utilize our physicians and nurses more efficient- ly. It is not intended to increase the number of clients seen per day. If you should have any further questions, please call either myself (296-4700) or Barbara Hadley (296-4668) . Sincerely, aul Murakami District Administrator cc: Barbara Hadley PM:nm Southeast Public Health Center 3001 N.E.4th Street Renton,Washington 98056 (206)296-4700 i-;erICL.C_ / rr/6 /7&/,eve- aL rLA-*-4- - - 4 e-,�-.-e- vie 5 s 0 C. _ . — . in.-.5.e... 0„—e12___ u,-,e_ 7 4A-.1 d , afc) 6° 21-A7-7,,_,,_,.._r: . 2' Serf () CP 13 0 --t- 02_,____%erdtk:-0-C-Q LOc-b°\'0 edt'-'-- 4' _xie itt,,,,,, - A ralkbar 5'1 0 c<0)-j a- ( KAIQG c. CAlP, DATE: PROJECT NAME AND/OR # ADDRESS TO BE PICKED UP BY FROM 1:3 r f ( rN ) Terj • • 3,„ rZ "12 b' (3,09'e ---=p-YIT\TI Vv-rvcv- 0 --57/ nr-tT Lira 9-rc-ro (WY -* I c7-71N ••••--,74 1) l'r7) 9t- 11 • ,, .. ,.. .. :.,, • • .................... .. .... ..CUB ?�N�`�.;:;:.:;.::�:�':.::;.::::;�.::..•::..::..::::::.:..::..:.:...:.:..::.;•.:.::.>:.;::.;:::.:;:.;:.;;:.;:..:.;:.::.;:.;;:.::..:• .,�..:. >:<:. :.;:<.;:.;:<.>:: « ,Yo- %4 7�h'..Mk ,vY,ks,a k.a hi4o3o- :r a l aF84Gt7,o. . . . NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form,,only those items related to your specific type of applicat'ion(s) are to be completed. Please print or•type, and attach additional sheets if necessary. APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION & FEES • NAME: frt'rT V4-04G 61P1Ty 1,:rt4 eci-at7 7 *REZONE FROM ( TO ) $ _SPECIAL PERMIT ADDRESS: Gadif1kA T Pv6�.t� hr t- AL"TN an?, TEMPORARY PERMIT BOO I 4111 • gC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CPa0-Z _SITE PLAN APPROVAL CITY:® , jJA ZIP: 9 Bone) _SPECIAL PERMIT - GRADE&FILL (NO. CU.YDS: - *VARIANCE TILEt HONE,NUMBER: (FROM SECTION: 2,91e- 4-4-0 to ROUTINE VEGETATION n—v. MANAGEMENT PERMIT --CONTACT PERSON (*JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) ram .; N%IviE:, e�O ia3ly /4,fL 9 SUBDIVISION: $ .. ; lu"f';dAoC.'f PrDM ts-mpa`(;QIZ SHORT PLAT ADDRESS: %6®B tJ, , 4`r41 _TENTATIVE PLAT fj /Pr _PRELIMINARY PLAT FINAL PLAT CITY: 4 i OI e.JJA ZIP: `j 13a5-lo _*WAIVER *(JUSTIFICATION REQUIRED) NO. OF LOTS: TELEPHONE NUMBER: PLAT NAME: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ OWNER _PRELIMINARY .J A • NAME: 4 -t-JC, COJ 'is 1'� i t-ITJisl • _FINAL AA A-C4ZM T DiVIS(a,) P.U.D.NAME: _. ADDRESS: 32o . IDNt(r4IS'[(Pa=ft QfJ Cs. • BINDING SITE PLAN: tj/A $ CITY: 5 C'-AfrTt/i.I k.as1p9 • ZIP: 5-8 104- MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ TELEPHONE NUMBER: (2,66)29t'- c. 4-6 _TENTATIVE PRELIMINARY (4/i LOCATION FINAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: PARK NAME: 40 I #4 't;, 4- /^ NO. OF SPACES: elt.ITdorI ( %.Ifs 98,0� e EXISTING USE: PUII.LC, W.A.1®Tt4 C Z JTrc(Z' • • ZONING: G- E ' `AENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $C 4Qo PROPOSED USE: T r���� (� 't�.' 5rI t JCS Eli 42o s,P. IA ut,'ccL. ®'"(ci..• a.tr tT TOTAL FEES: $bral-' T® fifes uss_o sT/VPF M 6471,ka rro\O e V - k /1-0,67 AREA: SQ.FT. OF PROPERTY: j. -7 Z ▪ Es9 A PLANNING Dm FF USE ONLY - - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING CI71'OF FIENFON DATE RECEIVED: APPLICATION RECEIVED & DETERMINED TO BE: OCT 2 6 1999 DATE ROUTED: ACCEPTED,NOTIFICATION SENT: v1 Li _INCOMPLETE,NOTIFICATION SENT: BY: Page 2 Legal de'cription of property (if more space is required, please attach a separate sheet). L .G. =A. -L y yD . 5�:.C. Al: Pr.-T.I. I T-1 G�i 1 �V T 4{"�` J�.1 3� �.J. ��E TS, OF 7'SNE,xrkVE'S7` N�L I OFr IQTHE NO'RTf-YEAST ` qUAR7`E OF THE 11\(0RT4 41EST RUA'iRTEk 1N' SOLIT {ERA { DF 7�1=1E� . C��I?' E L',f t lC71-lT OF' WA`r.1LINE='OF' � R D4 i�uEl�/LIE�" 0E7% "vA ".. I EX17p, fStl Nis„SEC17'40.M:z IRA1C?Er4� E'AST YW.tif. , E XCEFT; ';THE•• S'T ' FUR?;r--i Eli DE:SC0•rsEIp�AS' FO1``c C�iL.'S : -.ate '8E S7/.0 � t;T A''P0/Ai ' THE EAS7", LJAJE- 0` ABDU .`' • z �4tsu ��3 FEET, AI]D S`/°,rOS(;-•2C"W 52 09; FEk-, M.?-H • I NO2TH q(JA,2T.�i ;.µCOf NER O fi`,Sfa,/L72 SECTIC I,/�j 'N J� e*/ ,A C1J /E Tv ,7'hrE L FT W/TH�i4 BCCIN/�JI1�„ C3� r �.or 9 5 03'_J9 7w, AMoA,.eA"czi s o .4- ? ca -1T E-rNy I YHROIJ H4,AN AFDC DiSTA1ClC Nl F s `7 ;TC,; C1UC 'ti • � � �o r S -431 r151 176`„ W QC FEE-7t i71:1-71:1-,7.E:NC:, .( "FC,uRJE ,TO ' I Th `,RIC 4T,,''iro:T, ,: A'xe),S' FOF `c ±. . C� SEE 7 R.0 G 4 I.AN N s „aUEF M+'S Z•�`,{„fix.n �ou,D OF SQ 1t' S�ON ; Ne � ; 4 � ��+ IEAST SODA.IDAR y OF- SUCD/1//SI.ON' u /-/ N_C -N 1.05'26,1'm 59/,0.9 FE•E'T TO zoiA17- •F' c E "/ Ni AFFIDAVIT being duly sworn, declare that I am (please c eck one) X the authorized representative to act for the property owner, the owner of the property involved id this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the informat on herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to.the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSOR BED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _2 PAY OF rS .19 Sy NOTAR PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE.STATE OF WASlIN"TON-, RESIDING AT: ame o' Notary Public • (Signature of Owner) San 64., ,-16 me,4 i y ADAA G STANTI o (LLD& 10 Pietro tk4p-Cr„ So 5�31 a r S o (Address (Address) 5(z�rT e. � YA 56 t,car 5fr Tic i (City/Sta a/Zip) ��A (City/State/Zip) C2.0 c) ' Car 65 2 — 44,12. (Telepho e) (Telephone) Acceptan e of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other ma erial required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." RtnMast Revised ''/89 r. ti�Y o cITY OF RENT' N ♦ A ♦ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT '#Pk' PLANNING DIVISION �TO ... ,� FEE SCHEDULE APPLICATION FEE AMOUNT ANNEXATION $200 for 10% Petition $300 for 75% Petition APPEALS OF LAND-USE OR ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS $75 BINDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL $300 plus $20 per acre COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT $550 CONDITIONAL PERMIT $600 plus $20.per acre • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REVIEW: Environmental Checklist $75 if value less than $10,000 Review/Threshold Determination . $60 plus $1 per $10,000 if value greater than $10,000 Pre-Draft Consultation Report $150 plus $25 per acre Environmental Impact Statement Draft and Final(costs of $100 plus equivalent of City coordination and review) costs incurred Environmental sensitive land 1-1/2 times the above listed fee .o.r lands covered by water GRADING AND FILLING PERMITS $300 plus $25 per acre LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS $150 MOBILE HOME PARKS: Tentative $150 plus $1 per acre ' Preliminary $300 plus $5 per acre Final $150 plus $2.50 per acre OPEN SPACE $30 PLATS: Short Plat (Residential/ '• •'Commercial/Industrial) $400 Tentative Plat.. $150 I;re iminary - Residentialplus $2 pere acre i . $500 plus $20 per lot Preliminary - Industrial $600 plus $1 per 1,000 sq.ft: of land area Final - Residential $250 plus $10 per lot Final - Industrial $375 plus $10 per acre PUD: Tentative Plan $100 plus $10 per acre Preliminary Plan • $750 plus $25 per hour of work performed Final Plan $750 plus.$25 per hour of work performed Final Plat Extension $100 REZONE $600 plus $20 per acre SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT $150 if value Is less than $10,000 $300 if value is less than ,00 $400$50 if val0ue is from $50,000 to $100,000 $500 plus .02% of value over $100,000 (SITE APPROVAL $800 plus $20 per acre • SPECIAL PERMIT $600 plus $20 per acre TEMPORARY PERMIT $600 plus $20 per acre VARIANCE $300 WAIVER $75 EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 23, 1989 • • OF R4, 4?� ECF: I IZ(Q LU: [GU- I2(0 -81 $ .p z City of Renton u 0,9gT�D SEPlc,t,# ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,2IC RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,.write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ` Tempt) p—Y M@4U -A, Lie4l i 2. Name of applicant: .5e trL€ IA(r. e'r V F eC?t'. (•-cf 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: PPCLLL(L AL)r'cicc'o.(;nn, , cn.ct. 'mat NG ek' c<... 4. Date checklist prepared: .�c�" �.f g � S. Agency requesting checklist: C 0-C l&cti E c , 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): PLANNING DivisioN { S LJ e f. C3 3 F. ',w�( Ce o cr l�,i REN Of�I J Cc•- o f�� l 1 (�O : }.. _r, a. a o-{ 7Z LAVED i al 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. B. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by, your proposal? If yes, explain. _?+ u i :. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. ";)_es. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask' you to ,describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers-on this page.• �bo' 6nr C��2Yt...�_ ��„w e._C,? �'V2�°'L��..�t..__n_ 'e:' / f •Cc� l� >, + c,t a U" eLlr C,tA..VS L t_d �+z.�� y�(-LA_ �+l �!< ) "7 2-0 d + a. ..�,p ,y� Vc,,.,. ,,. _ �;6t�,4: ";i{dL..t.F4f� �.wdil tf""' ,.cL.,��-• M.'�. °'y�Ri`t `z t e U�'-e:Q t C p d Vie_ L• =d-L �.. 1 (�L'�_ a �(`2.. 4^^-ca..�` 1 8�C9x� e+r. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. `-cill/ A-0 ,c®1i&s 00 P 4714) p w.(A3t5®5 ��+ I�P- c�.�. T(®�y..�q 14, ,- Ac 1 'p`�.qd�-rrZQ d' Pp co t Q Lo C +'►rt c(ri Or-SPCA- IAI`0 t'V�_{e�/Ay+P/��g.`J/ a ietz-�- r kthw r�(,/{� �p' spa eiG 'ice tirJ f� { I iLs:1'rw f,"jL 1 i t 4 , I'`®•I 1 F! ".� ae3 V 4 t� 0 0 1 I [1, It � �16,F ,(Cr., 19 C..1 r(C QJb az To-e®S A-OH-`') _2,4 0(4.4 1l !c Z` MAP : NIT! Cat) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the ,site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other ezfAc.J'T J( ,t,e()!act b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any primem farmland. ,1 A /° !+9 o r TQ e S/ +II a riD Le'tilr.1 �1°v(,i 64 �90°�t 4.1 f ' l.J�°l ,St TO 2' /4%0460 SA-40 &CoItMial, pIt-f , 5,000 Pn1 I4t J. Q 'AA 6 2! ro (�' (�A�f� -�D S/rsr* stMcrAsA D 0 to,ono Ps !c , r411t1,1G d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediat:. vicinity? If so, describe. - 2 - . 1 e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Na g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal.(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. rWA b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? NC' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 11/A 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. t-►0 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. rib 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. rJfA - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. 0 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so. describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Ne ' b. Ground: 1) Will ground watei 'be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. `zl..0 • 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Or/A c. Water Runoff (including storm water):' 1) Describe the source of runoff. (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any"(include quantities, if' known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. rf - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: lut, D ,co TO Gurr2xg, okftTalon . Per fun1 etkogre, stol (-1 tZj 01.d srkerg 1uc & -06 - 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: )4 deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other >g evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other g Shrubs oa grass 'o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: • NO rile', 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds other &u6.,:. .. Mammals: deer bear, elk, beaver, othe (,t ��:�., Fish: bass, sa mon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Oil c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. h-) Q - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or'enhance wildlife, if:any: 6. Energy and Natural Resources , a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. • b. Would your project affect the potential. use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to. reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and•.explosion, spill. or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. iso 14 EE, 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? - 6 - 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: titA 8. Land and Shoreline Use • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? N-eJJ 'S;;. �tlrZla-"� 7 ` b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. / &' >r ` CAN.„0„,„girt_L, d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 1 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. • Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? k TO 1 ( 4 [[ j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units. would. be provided, if . any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. rJ(A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. r/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: (*VA 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. � o aw 6ti-T cop) S �Di�G b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce' Q or control aesthetic impacts, if any: iJ/ 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? /- (t b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?_ • c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: JiA - 8 - • • • 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. t c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Po b. Generally describe. any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. r JfPt c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. An Pc t AC-LASS 11-62 ® ; is l r-i Ca (.60e.rrr Tit J c p&g, • b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? �? r r 42yA:o.y: F - E .\� E.`G� !tea_�_ E.E_ _� � 0 C' c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). - 9 - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water,-rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. �c7 J f. . How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by,the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 14.r g. Proposed measures to reduce or;control transportation impacts, if any: WA • 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently_available at_the site electricity,, natural gas, water refuse service,ttetepJ enitary sew r septic system, other. • b. Describe the. utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on'the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. q C. SIGNATURE' " I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is:understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any 'willful' misrepresentation or willful lack of full-disclosure on my part. ' Proponent: ►A rk � ;of 0-- Name Printed: i � e r cP - 10 - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? INI/A` Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? tir,A Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life ate: Ni/A 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: •� ' /:.� .. .i'(. a 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Pi/f - Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: r /A - 11 - 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? tvp% Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are; i4/t 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. SIGNATURE I. the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on, my part. Proponent: K. R e _ Name Printed: ; -1-h k . - 12 - 0 • City of Seattle King County Charles Royer,Mayor Tim Hill,Executive Seattle-King County Department of Public Health Bud Nicola,M.D.,M.H.S.A.,Director DT: October 24, 1989 TO: City of Renton Community Development Department FM: Judith Pierce, County Division Director 0- King County Department of Public Health RE: King County Southeast Public Health Center Conditional Use Permit/Modular Office Unit I am here providing justification for acquiring a Conditional Use Permit for the above referenced project as required by your application procedure. Responses correspond with your list of criteria on Pages 2 and 3 of the document entitled "Conditional Use Permit - Application Procedure". The project scope of work requires that King County provide a temporary 720 square feet modular office unit to be sited 15 feet to the west of the existing King County Southeast Public Health Center at 3001 N.E. 4th Street, Renton, Washington. The County will use the modular unit for two years as office/conference/meeting space, pending construction of a new Southeast Public Health Center. The following list of criteria sets forth our justification for requiring tem- porary usage of the modular unit: 1. Comprehensive Plan: Proposed project is compatible with the goals and objectives of the City of Renton' s Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and other programs in that it is temporary and its visual and environmental impacts on the project site are negligible. 2. Community Need: There is a direct community need for the proposed project in that it is an integral part of the King County public health master plan which requires construction of a new, improved Southeast Public Health Center. The location of the modular office unit is not detrimental to the plans of the City of Renton or to the County in that it will result in no increase to parking or public/County use of the project site. Proposed project location is ideal for its intended use in that it is the least visually apparent side of the existing building, yet provides for direct and easy staff access. PLANN`.G OIVISION CIYY OF FIENTON OCT 2 6 1989 RECLAVED 110 Prefontaine Place South,Suite 600 Seattle,Washington 98104-2614 (206)296-4600 City of Renton Community Development Department October 24, 1989 Page Three 10. Conversion: No conversion of use of the existing building or modular unit is here being proposed. 11. Public Improvements: Use and location of the proposed project do not affect the public' s use of the existing facility or the surrounding areas. JP:SS:ay SS1.40-SS1.40.2 cc: Paul Murakami , District Administrator, Department of Public Health Don Cherno, Manager, Office of Capital Planning and Development ATTN: Stephen Swinburne, Project Manager „k` ;.i' ,',,i:^ •1+ ''1,,, - .,f: ;;.! is . :yr-:v: ,f' 1 g '.”j ..i 'i fcjJ., 't�, '1 f.{ Y 1 4• nd 5.. •),. ,+i 1 'Y { ira.e. k.rf _ _r r2, I'� .�Ir� Sri.t. Y J h' h •''i•i .t tt 1 P ".., f, c .5r'. S:r v r '.trfi ,2,'rr t�''•! •v, ,:�' if 1 .i:'• ;r. k t^ r taw .'1• .h t r t 1 1u• ''r ,1t 1'r r.s•/ .5s b:• ••\ �\ Y,, c ''�' b' 'lai '1,,.., h �Ir, I 'I / 'C' 'J: , r :1 a„ {rr ,Y a Y r J ,l,f 7�:•r t.' I ••1 y� I•-r.. .,r^/•, •r4 l t. ,q• rr{{ ,:' r;: ,i J try r 7 h :J'''•r: i' .,� S, r� 1 I r Y Y Y ', '`..Sig tl i ^'I �. ` 1 v, ,w.'• nl tee.t . ' 6{'- ,la•. �''r •1'. ',ti t a 7�'. T J:r r. , � .J '�' :.y, :t• ,t 11:! W'. �i% a 3": 1'� a� LL •'E'r J .l , YP''"r 'V {i .r. ,. r' T , , u ,I r'. Y •rl'••t h': !• J '1 ,J,• d rrfi„ ,iy,J 'i I vi w •a' ,f r 1t 5 l 4'• d•Y ki,.• x� :y s, R 'i' 4% • ( f._ • • t s t' / /•f . !-� I� 1:•t•in, L'i ,4 rk , .ir{ !,j' r:Jn ,.i:'... l,,, 'IY, .ITy .,il, ) Ti• �,,'. `'I'Is;, ,,( Y.- •ya ,t.,•y, 14',t4 .1','dj't... 9: • •;i• .), :ii:: 77 1'r:�I ti, • kV O 'ri'�, ,1 c.,t:- A t., ,.i`r .It,S rt .''�' 1 i"1• ,di,y;. -,. r41�� •4 ,y:,1;+x r>„ :t1F.1 Y,,.�i�5.'',i\Y:!r + Fl. p.�.J :! �•� .5Y • ,7' 1� . ;;L'h axe.::::: - ''.. C lt::fit• ..', F' F''f DUF'LIC:ATE E �:r.• . ;:e :::.jh , :�:':'• ��'„''. DL.IF'I_ICf1�f_ REC:ET . r>;tira>;x:,~ 1 y .S �1 �. • ,,r • • i,..,i :i%:' iv:u,.,/,:,aY P.ai 5.,,1 ai li .a_._-�...._._•___.�...__ yt,•:,!:,'•;j, .r:.: '`r,:,iti;:;,ir,h,..yo is, 'll��'-t . GITY OF RENT A •}:,. 5.rl; r.:•.,;{`S,i.,,iC;f/ ii•. 'i' ..e1 .0 Yi:;: \ v'f .FF 'fF_Ab.If 'i _I l • ;'• «rY S ti' 1 % ;ati:. .,f• .a-l.,,,• •C8 am ••��,,,,,, I �• 'mot.��a! q'q ,15 kC:h'T I • r' __ !_ - r�i, Am U N'f :., �", If I i': I •.}: _111 II ;.Jf. �: EJJS REV ,. .,,;::. I ilil EL �'• �J_ I'1IS_ '>� USE :,f}�Jq.Jn:.. ';i I ••III 1�I I III i II'I'11 J_•I 11 ir, r.; iuiil,il_ J. r.. 'r'• u ;rn II y I 'EVE., N _I5 REVE 'i'I •LLA Mai` ,Ili �CE r' „r•!"'><:'rlr.s I. 11:'' f. J, N.. r`}:'L'` it J+, r .r�;�; REVI EW ''NI S ft�I ;•F ?J )' 11 I Y$'iI N 1 I I III III IIII I _II _..III .. _I.111 _'�l, 1f a f� • ,.` �sr 'tia q TOTAL DUE i .; � ,1 RFGEISLU FROM:� '; ' • A '- ' i �x. r KING COUNTY OFFICEOF FL.ANNING 4 - • ..1 : ail. ,r ,(i r, .., . .r,'.: $68 t.I"IIJ �'. ,.,' ct! 'i:' };',:fL:.��FF):<. t 'TENDERED. 2�... :�I'.,. :1 ,. rya(, t'• I I I 11 n• I. `�`` `•��' ; C:HAhl,E DUE j '.;; ;,.,,r,,, i, '•� '! `1' , —•_ __,_,—._ ':Y• y 5,. A' ,: .a:ice +' C: E RECEIPT I`' �• rFL`�,�. r.. FT Db 4L DUPLICATE l ': • ,r•.: I .:i `:,f i FF J'4'` r',f. .t x'l'` 1' 1, yy 1 i: .er ��i' ., ' 4 • .r �' i _, yS 'r �E'J .t:'. 3 f- r. '. +1+:'�, as (rl` .Lr is 15^�': '1 r.f '!''v,. r 1. :,fin rt r'• 'l i 1 r.� ''1: • r:1' iT r.•I: :R��a r, v '.r:' is ::`?%_ I 6 „ n r•• •J Jr j: y,. r:l i 4 ri'. .C !re,:', ':C: { 1 ,r••5.. r J' .rf:,. ''.7 r 11.^ J 5 n! •r jM1l _ a•.Y ;::, • 4 Y I •'f 1'^ ,S r{ty} .In [^ % a'J rr 1 i Y '1"r •r f: J. 't1 •i" • 3: • ,r. )r' 1 �a t ( 1'' x E,. •l r �f i{ "fir f A' a' J r 4: d i i •• fa. •.S l ft h l,� E'• J' .,,,. • tl• .f ten,,• t,r •f °T.. 41 r J•, ;c t .•I , slit:,;..:. •:'(i .l':.�,r fi••,1 r: �a, 1• `rl `sip` • n .•`. la +'i' r•, d p:,'.'{". 5{ . > i.'iY+'�ir it ,4 •.'Y.: 1 i`Y s.l 1 :1: i.j"'f ri:. �I rl J". T,' p r, ,u ). • .1• :'i MA -Ni yrt, :U jj r' L •s �yt.: rl t+. `s.. ,1st' • • ..t� {�:;�, i. �i� JF 1:''.1. •.Y nf, t'` lu �• v •r' C '1 t :1V` "1: 'r r`�O / 'z• „5: 'w ''11�' :1•i! 'r" j': ., ..4 1'rI 'ice 1, r w.J fir!. �y_ r••: :•I: :l':i: r•Y f, '�f r ,'i ra:, ; . •rp .G" a�` J.i. ,... ,t;j�:. 1� +'tt Y ;;tic?i�i' <';'•' -ir;' 'f.3�i Arid. q 'Y' 1'1 1.•..• r y l:. R. t' 'i t .'11 1 �7.� 4 .i+ •rr. P ti'J L' } 1. { 4_1 'j: } • !tS 4"• t S' :'f ''-Y. rt': J 1� r1r 4. .rt..7 �` rY N• .y t1' rc�S' r. 5r. •t' r. Y':' ;r! r 1 :'S .511'' J'7 I .A. ( :! A , J. t•t�j t, r• T. '� .rt i')n ••f n � 'i' p 'b I. r[.' raa" •,w is; c. T. ra. :: • n t, � +! , � A Y' 1� 5. 1. ! ri. Jr. <"J 6, :,�• 3 r ..4 'J \i "r? .i' Y,.f°' .t ,, yS, t r`, r 5 4'•n �t .r t• t r•d, Y l rr r �i' �7 :S(• r C "t' N :fi- ti: 5 •;�• 'ir u nsb i':. i. ! A` '4•• a ,,% "'l e tt .a,, "yf`r ii .4.: t f r`SY.. { '�'�i :n .i 7 r' ... 1.! :;:n:r;': k ry r'I. I' 'ti ,.fit . :.r. I { 'il:' . Y�a 1 'r 7'x "t'1 �.. `i •4:4 5 rt '�i. i.'a.e J i t 1 "1.... h �.t :r, 'tJ:�:,. 1tjT ':I,. y^f. rr .1, 1+ F. { :tt� 'r"tf u 14..f. +srr t. '1 ,,,,,ii• .i. t 'n .h:• .o- n h `S. at�z F Y +3 :1' r r`b` t• ,I`, 4s! i� •T 4• , i. �.i.'. '19' �li - 4' •.'. ''fi 1f h�,�I i rr: Y':'-1 :i `i..ir: ii: ,q, l�; r,'i tt{ �r •1 'ry 'f 1�. ..7 �i ,'it`�: �y :1.. , �q '1 t•• 1, '� 1 c r.': 'I sa J 'v,r �ti2;'.. :lr q. rt•,' 'RY';J3.tel: ' J 'f• 'la x ,t' u - t - q d ,Y,.�n .. ' 1!`•Jh `a' �. :r ,L '1' n '`I :M1 ,�z ,r:f , .•t�. t• s: • ]}. 5r ri'1 Yt�. r` - ..sit'•.:-: r .a .i` pp , 1 .r.'.f�. ti ^, r f `'r: 'I� 4 ��,,i :1,.T: yr;•,.: 'rl f' 1 ,1� y't. f,a.. .!. �:by p;� .? t w. 'i. 1)a4 nit .4 .J•• r '::c1'r� :1 , ` is sl•1. y y'r: •' r.• S' h. r ;i��:�';;'ri��;� 'P I 1'r I J < 'L" �r a' ':I 1. `k 5� - -1 •S :4y. 9 p`, ,i4.1 .b'i r Z, 'f,. 5, :1 'J.r �i. .Lr „ ,r it '�•'iT. .r r �, 'l` • 1,L•f •4 .r t' ;su �`r' ,1! 1 r jJ I! a Y ;, i. 'w. )