Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21925-R-Tree Retention Inspection-2022-11-09-WA Forestry WASHINGTON FORESTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. FORESTRY AND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS W F C I O: 360/943-1723 C: 360/561-4407 9136 Yelm Hwy SE Olympia, WA 98513 URBAN/RURAL FORESTRY • TREE APPRAISAL • TREE RISK ASSESSMENT RIGHT-OF-WAYS • VEGETATION MANAGEMENT • FOREST/TREE MGT. PLANS • EXPERT TESTIMONY Member of International Society of Arboriculture and Society of American Foresters November 9, 2022 Serena Dudaš MainVue Homes 121 3rd Avenue Kirkland, WA 98033 RE: Edenfield - Retention Tree Inspection Report Dear Ms. Dudaš: We have evaluated all retained trees located on the Edenfield subdivision off 156th Avenue SE in Renton, WA. The purpose was to determine the number of trees retained, evaluate their health, and make any recommendations for cultural care. A field assessment was conducted on November 3, 2022. Findings and Recommendations The tree list on the approved site plans indicated 49 trees were planned to be retained onsite. Tree species include Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), flowering cherry (Prunus spp.), western redcedar (Thuja plicata), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), and bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata). A total of 50 trees were retained on the Edenfield site, one tree more than planned. Tree #3, a 17-inch DBH Douglas-fir, that was identified as a removal tree was retained. The tree is located within 4-feet of the new sidewalk. Over 40% of this tree’s root system has been impacted from the grading and installation of the sidewalk. It is expected that the health of the tree will decline from the disturbance and may need removal in the future. All the remaining trees retained onsite were properly protected from construction disturbance and will be quality long-term trees. Recommended cultural care is to cover the tree protection areas with 3 – 4 inches of quality mulch. This will prevent weed growth and help the soil from drying out during the summer months. Edenfield Retention Tree Inspection Report Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 2 Photo A. View of trees 3 – 8 retained in the 156th Avenue SE frontage. Summary Our inspection found 50 trees retained on the Edenfield site, one additional tree than planned. The additional tree has had a large portion of its root system impacted from construction. Its health will more than likely decline in the next 3 years and may need to be removed when no longer healthy. All other trees will be quality long-term trees in the landscape. Please give us a call if you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, Galen M. Wright, ACF, ASCA Joshua Sharpes ISA Bd. Certified Master Arborist PN-129BU Professional Forester Certified Forester No. 44 ISA Certified Arborist ISA Tree Risk Assessor Qualified Municipal Specialist, PN-5939AM ASCA Tree and Plant Appraisal Qualified ISA Tree Risk Assessor Qualified 3 5 4 6 7, 8 Edenfield Retention Tree Inspection Report Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 3 Attachment 1. Edenfield Retention Tree Plan. Retained Tree 130 131 132 10 11 12 3 - 8 55 – 62 65 – 86 90 – 98 Edenfield Retention Tree Inspection Report Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 4 Attachment 2. Photolog (WFCI 11/3/22). Photo B. View of retained trees 130 - 132 along eastern line of project. Photo C. View of retained western redcedar trees along the southern property line. 132 131 130 Edenfield Retention Tree Inspection Report Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 5 Attachment 3. Individual Tree Rating Key for Tree Condition RATING SYMBOL DEFINITION Very Good VG • Balanced crown that is characteristic of the species • Normal lateral and terminal branch growth rates for the species and soil type • Stem sound, normal bark vigor • No root problems • No insect or disease problems • Long-term, attractive tree Good G • Crown lacking symmetry but nearly balanced • Normal lateral and terminal branch growth rates for the species and soil type • Minor twig dieback O.K. • Stem sound, normal bark vigor • No root problems • No or minor insect or disease problems – insignificant • Long-term tree Fair F • Crown lacking symmetry due to branch loss • Slow lateral and terminal branch growth rates for the species and soil type • Minor and major twig dieback – starting to decline • Stem partly unsound, slow diameter growth and low bark vigor • Minor root problems • Minor insect or disease problems • Short-term tree 10-30 years Poor P • Major branch loss – unsymmetrical crown • Greatly reduced growth • Several structurally import dead or branch scaffold branches • Stem has bark loss and significant decay with poor bark vigor • Root damage • Insect or disease problems – remedy required • Short-term tree 1-10 years Very Poor VP • Lacking adequate live crown for survival and growth • Severe decline • Minor and major twig dieback • Stem unsound, bark sloughing, previous stem or large branch failures, very poor bark vigor • Severe root problems or disease • No or minor insect or disease problems • Mortality expected within the next few years Dead DEAD • Dead Edenfield Retention Tree Inspection Report Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 6 Attachment 4. Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 1) Any legal description provided to the Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. is assumed to be correct. Any titles and ownership's to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and clear, under responsible ownership and competent management. 2) It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations, unless otherwise stated. 3) Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information. 4) Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement. 5) Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidated the entire report. 6) Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. 7) Neither all or any part of the contents of this report, nor copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. -- particularly as to value conclusions, identity of Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc., or any reference to any professional society or to any initialed designation conferred upon Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. as stated in its qualifications. 8) This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc., and the fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result, the occurrence neither of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding in to reported. 9) Sketches, diagrams, graphs, and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. 10) Unless expressed otherwise: 1) information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the tree or other plant or property in question may not arise in the future. Note: Even healthy trees can fail under normal or storm conditions. The only way to eliminate all risk is to remove all trees within reach of all targets. Annual monitoring by an ISA Certified Arborist or Certified Forester will reduce the potential of tree failures. It is impossible to predict with certainty that a tree will stand or fail, or the timing of the failure. It is considered an ‘Act of God’ when a tree fails, unless it is directly felled or pushed over by man’s actions.