Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_SEPA_Checklist_222810_v1.pdfSEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 1 of 17 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 2 of 17 A. Background 1.Name of proposed project, if applicable: Goddard School 2. Name of applicant: Applicant: Clover Schuler, Magellan Architects 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Contact Person: Magellan Architects Contact: Clover Schuler 8383 158th Ave NE, Ste. 280 Redmond, WA 98052 O: 425-885-4300 C: 425-941-9494 4. Date checklist prepared: October 18, 2022 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Washington Department of Community and Economic Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): This project will be constructed in a single phase with construction to start beginning of 2023 and finish fall of 2023. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No future additions or expansions are planned for this project. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The Civil Engineer has prepared drawings and a stormwater TIR report to address the drainage at the new exterior playground area. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 3 of 17 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Not Applicable. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The City of Renton will require a Type II land use approval process and for this SEPA Environmental Checklist to be linked to construction plans associated with the new playground scope of work. Additional permits will be required for the following activities: Building “Change of Use” Permit – For construction of the new daycare facility in an existing building. Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing Permit – will be submitted as deffered submittal. Fire Sprinkler & Alarm Permit – will be submitted as deffered submittal. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This will be an approx. 12,000 SF new daycare facility for a Goddard School location in an existing building. The project is located in the old 24 Hour Fitness location in the Highland Shopping Center. An approx. 6,000 SF exterior playground will be constructed in an existing grass area north of the existing building. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Location of scope of work: An approx. 6,000 SF exterior playground will be constructed in an existing grass area north of the existing building. (See site plan at end of document.) Address: 4110 NE 4th Street, Renton, WA Legal Description: por w ½ of sw ¼ of sw ¼ – beg sw cor sd subd th n 0-25-13 w 42.04 ft th s 88-02-58 e plw s ln sd subd 40.03 ft to the intsn of e mgn of union ave ne with the n mgn of ne 4th st th n 0-25-13 w 158 ft to tpob th s 88-02-58 e 142.12 ft to e ln of w 182 ft sd subd th n 89- 43-21 e 214.64 ft to w ln of e 250 ft of sd w ½, meas alg s ln, th n 0-16-39 w 474.96 ft to s ln of n 629 ft th n 88-11-32 w 92.89 ft to e ln of w 305 ft sd subd th s 0-25-13 e65.05 ft to s ln of n 694 ft th n 88-11-32 w 265.20 ft to e mgn of union ave ne th s 0-25-13 e 417.41 ft to tpob – aka lot 1 of city of renton lot ln adj no 007-82 recording no 8207079005 Site Plan: See attached at end of the document. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 4 of 17 Vicinity Map: See attached at end of the document. B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a.General description of the site: Relatively flat with no significant slopes onsite. (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________ b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 15%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Glacial till. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no surface indications of unstable soils and/or a history of soil instability manifesting itself, either onsite or in the immediate vicinity. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Aprocimately 6,700-sf of land will be disturbed for the project. The largest portion of the existing site is currently developed as a maintained lawn area. The remainder areas are currently developed as a commercial building loading dock. The area will be reconfigured into a system of pathways and a preschool playground. An estimated 125-CY of material will be excavated and approximately 250-CY of fll will be imported. Export materials will be delivered to a local licensed gravel pit, and import materials will be trucked to the site from a local licensed gravel pit. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Although erosion could occur, it is highly unlikely to occur. The site is small and generally topographically isolated. Temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures will be implemented to prevent erosion and sedimentation problems. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 5 of 17 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 87% of the site areas will be covered with pervious play area surfacing. The remaining 13% will be covered with pavement. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Proposed measures will include silt fence, inlet protection, stabilized construction enrance, and stockpile and exposed areas covering. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. To the best of the Applicant' s knowledge, the project will not produce any significant adverse impacts and/or result in excessive emissions of particulates or noxious odors either during construction or future operations. During construction, minimal impacts may be realized as particulates (dust, dirt, etc.) are released into the air on a limited basis. A reliable estimate of quantities cannot be formulated at this time. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No off-site sources of significant emissions or odor have been identified as affecting the proposal. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. To the best of the Applicant' s knowledge, there is no surface water bodies in the immediate vicinity that will be affected by this scope of work. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No work will occur over, in or adjacent to the described waters. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 6 of 17 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredging of designated wetlands is proposed. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. The site does not lie within a 100-year floodplain. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters are proposed. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. The project does not propose to withdraw groundwater from a well for drinking water or other purposes. The project does not propose to discharge water to groundwater. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. / No discharge of waste materials to groundwater from septic tanks is associated with the construction of this project. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater runoff will come from on-site areas only. The proposed improvements include a stormwater infiltration and detention system to meet applicable City of Renton stormwater requirements. Stormwater runoff from the site will be SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 7 of 17 discharged to the existing private stormwater management system, currently serving the commercial development, of which the project is a part. From the private stormwater management system, attenuated runoff flows are discharged to the city public drainage system, which conveys runoff to Maplewood Creek. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters are proposed or anticiapted. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. No discharges of waste materials to surface waters are proposed. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: The proposed improvements include a stormwater infiltration and detention system to meet applicable City of Renton stormwater requirements. Stormwater runoff from the site will be discharged to the existing private stormwater management system, currently serving the commercial development, of which the project is a part. 4. Plants a.Check the types of vegetation found on the site: __X__deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other __X__evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other __X__shrubs __X__grass ____pasture ____crop or grain ____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ____other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None of the existing vegetation will be removed or altered by this proposal. Should any existing vegetation be damaged by construction activity, the Applicant will replace as needed. b.List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 8 of 17 To the best of the Applicant's knowledge, there are no known threatened or endangered species on site or in the immediate vicinity. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None of the existing vegetation will be removed or altered by this proposal. Should any existing vegetation be damaged by construction activity, the Applicant will replace as needed. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. To the best of the Applicant' s knowledge, there are no noxious weeds or invasive species on site or in the immediate vicinity. 5. Animals [help] a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________ b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. None known. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None of the existing vegetation will be removed or altered by this proposal. Should any existing vegetation be damaged by construction activity, the Applicant will replace as needed. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 9 of 17 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The existing building’s energy needs are not beng affected by this proposal. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Given the scope of the project as a tenant improvement, no specific energy conservation features are proposed. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. To the best of the Applicant' s knowledge, no projected environmental health hazards are or will be associated with the proposed improvements. 1)Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. No known sources of contamination exist. 2)Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. To the best of the Applicant' s knowledge, there are no hazardous chemicals or Conditions present onsite or in the immediate vicinity which could affect project design or construction. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. No toxic or hazardous chemicals will be routinely stored, used , and/or produced during the project's construction and/or during routine operations aside from unleaded and diesel fuels stored on site and dispensed to motor vehicles. 4)Describe special emergency services that might be required. The need for special emergency services is not expected to increase or SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 10 of 17 decrease as a result of the proposed project. 5)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Measures undertaken to control environmental health hazards will include the use of licensed contractors and technicians ensuring compliance with all City of Renton and state regulations including, but not limited to, the Model Toxics Control Act, Washington Administrative Code Dangerous Waste Regulations, and Washington State UST regulations. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? No significant adverse impacts are projected. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. Given the nature of the project, the Applicant does not anticipate noise levels will increase in the long term. Short-term increases can be expected due to the presence of construction equipment onsite. Following traditional workday schedules, construction will occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and conclude no later than 5:00 PM; no construction will occur on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction noise is typically mitigated through the use of noise attenuation devices installed on heavy equipment. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. The site is currently the Highland Shopping Center and will remain that use. The specific suite that Goddard School will be occupying was previously a 24 Hour Fitness location. The adjacent properties are Multi-Family zones. No changes to the land uses. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? No SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 11 of 17 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No c. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing shopping center building on the property that will not be affected by this proposal. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? “CA” Commerical Arterial Zone and Urban Design District ‘D’ overlay f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) land use designation g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not Applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. According to COR Maps, the site is located within a Moderate Landslide Hazard Area. We have confirmed with Scott Warlink that due to our scope of work, a Geotech report is not required. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approx. 26 staff would work in the completed project. Approx. 170 children would reside in the project. A total of approx. 200 occpuants would be in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None, the 24 hour facility is vacant and not operating. The suite is vacant at this time. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. The suite is vacant at this time and the proposal does not displace any people. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 12 of 17 L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The CA zone allows for a variety of retail uses. Based on the age of the students, the use would be classified as a “Daycare Center”. A “Daycare Center” use is permitted outright in the CA zone m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: Not Applicable 9. Housing [help] a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. None. There is no residential component. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. Not Applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. There is no residential component. 10. Aesthetics [help] a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Not Applicable. The building structure is existing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not Applicable. The building structure is existing. No views will be altered in this proposal. c.Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not Applicable. The building structure is existing. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 13 of 17 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The only type of lighting that will be new are (4) exterior wall mounted light fixtures to light up the new playground areas. All of these fixtures will only be on during daycare hours of 6am – 6pm. One or two of the lights will remain on as security lighting for around the building. Currently, there is existing exterior building lighting existing. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No, new lighting will be attached to the existing building and not be a safety hazard or interfere with views. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: The new exterior lighting will have light shields to reduce any potential glare or light pollution. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Heritage Park is located 2-3 blocks away off of Union Ave NE. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and cultural preservation [help] a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. No. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 14 of 17 b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. No. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Not Applicable. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. Not Applicable. 14. Transportation [help] a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. All access driveways are existing and not changing. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? There is an existing metro bus stop along Union Ave next to the parcel. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? No additional parking spaces required and no existing parking spaces being removed. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 15 of 17 f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Refer to Traffic/Parking Memo at end of this document. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not Applicable. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not Applicable. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ___________ Exiting utilities include electric power, natural gas, water, sanitary sewer, stormwater, telecom and cable. No new utilities required. b.Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The development and building are existing. No new utilities required. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 16 of 17 C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ___________________________________________________ Name of signee __________________________________________________ Position and Agency/Organization ____________________________________ Date Submitted: _____________ D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Oct 2022 Page 17 of 17 wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.