Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutD_RVMP and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v1DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT D_RVMP and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v2_FINAL and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v1 PLANNING DIVISION ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT AND CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM CRITICAL AREAS REGULATIONS EVALUATION FORM & DECISION DATE OF DECISION: January 25, 2023 PROJECT NUMBER: LUA22-000429, RVMP, CAE PROJECT NAME: Echo Mountain Tree Maintanance PROJECT MANAGER: Alex Morganroth, Senior Planner APPLICANT/CONTACT: Eric Mullin, A Plus Tree, Inc, 985 Walnut Ave, Vallejo, CA 94592 OWNER: Au-Montclair Investors LLC, 2223 Benson Rd, Renton, WA 98055 PROJECT LOCATION: 2223 Benson Rd S, Renton, WA 98055 (APN 3376750000) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting approval of a Routine Vegetation Management Permit (RVMP) and Critical Areas Exemption (CAE) for tree maintenance at the apartment complex located at 2223 Benson Rd S (APN 3376750000). The property is approximately 16.1 acres in size. The property is located within the Residential Multi-family (RMF) zone and has a Comprehensive Land Use designation of Residential High Density (RHD). The applicant proposed to remove three (3) significant trees including an 8.7 caliper-inch Red alder, a 17.3 caliper-inch Lodgepole pine, and a 10.7 caliper-inch London plane. A significant tree is defined as a tree with a caliper of at least six inches (6"), or an alder or cottonwood tree with a caliper of at least eight inches (8") (RMC 4-11-200). The applicant, a professionally-certified ISA arborist, submitted a TRAQ report that classified all trees proposed for removal as ‘high-risk’ (attached). The purpose of the tree removal is to prevent damage to nearby buildings and vehicles in the parking lot due a branch or root failure. In addition, the applicant proposes crown cleaning to address dieback in the upper crown for a 11.4 caliper-inch European white birch and a 10 caliper-inch European white birch. Minor clearance pruning of approximately 84 addition trees, identified in a second TRAQ report (attached) is also proposed across the site. The trees proposed for removal, crown cleaning, or pruning are not concentrated in a specific area of the site, but rather are spread out across the large, heavily treed complex. According to COR Maps, Sensitive Slopes (15-40%), Protected Slopes (40%+), a High Erosion Hazard, a High Landslide Hazard, a Moderate Coalmine Hazard, and a High Coalmine Hazard, are present on the site. Per RMC 4-3-050.C, dangerous tree removal (i.e. high risk tree) within a geologic hazard area is an exempt activity from the Critical Areas Regulations in RMC 4-3-050. The removal of more than two (2) significant in a trees in a DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption Echo Mountain Tree Maintenance LUA22-000429, RVMP, CAE Date of Permit: January 25, 2023 Page 2 of 4 D_RVMP and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v2_FINAL and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v1 one-year period. across the site exceeds the allowed tree removal activities threshold per RMC 4-4-130 and therefore requires an approved RVMP. CRITICAL AREAs: Sensitive Slopes (15-40%), Protected Slopes (40%+), a High Erosion Hazard, a High Landslide Hazard, a Moderate Coalmine Hazard, and a High Coalmine Hazard EXEMPTION JUSTIFICATION: Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-3-050 Critical Areas Regulations: RMC 4-3-050C.3.c.iii. Maintenance and Construction - Agricultural, Harvesting, Vegetation Management: Dangerous Trees (i.e. high risk). FINDINGS: The proposed development is consistent with the following findings pursuant to RMC section 4-3- 050C.2.d: i. The activity is not prohibited by this or any other provision of the Renton Municipal Code or State or Federal law or regulation; ii. The activity will be conducted using best management practices as specified by industry standards or applicable Federal agencies or scientific principles; iii. Impacts are minimized and, where applicable, disturbed areas are immediately restored; iv. Where water body or buffer disturbance has occurred in accordance with an exemption during construction or other activities, revegetation with native vegetation shall be required; v. If a hazardous material, activity, and/or facility that is exempt pursuant to this Section has a significant or substantial potential to degrade groundwater quality, then the Administrator may require compliance with the Wellhead Protection Area requirements of this Section otherwise relevant to that hazardous material, activity, and/or facility. Such determinations will be based upon site and/or chemical -specific data. ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA 4-9-195.D.4: YES 1. The lot shall comply with minimum tree density requirements pursuant to RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations. Comments: Per RMC 4-4-130.H, tree credit requirements shall comply at a minimum rate of 30 credits per net acre. The applicant submitted a tree unit calculation (attached) that indicated the site had a total of 1,662 tree credits. After removal of the three (3) trees, resulting in the loss of 14 credits, the site would have a total of 1,648 credits. Based on the total area of the site, approximately 16.1 acres, a total of 484 tree credits is required at the rate of 30 credits per acre (30 credits x 16.1 acres = 484 credits). Therefore, the site would comply with the tree credit requirement after removal of the three (3) trees. YES, if Critical Areas Exemption 2. The land clearing and tree removal shall be consistent with restrictions for critical areas, pursuant to RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations, and RMC 4-3- 050, Critical Areas Regulations. DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption Echo Mountain Tree Maintenance LUA22-000429, RVMP, CAE Date of Permit: January 25, 2023 Page 3 of 4 D_RVMP and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v2_FINAL and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v1 is approved Comments: The proposed tree removal and pruning is located in areas mapped with Sensitive Slopes (15-40%), Protected Slopes (40%+), a High Erosion Hazard, a High Landslide Hazard, a Moderate Coalmine Hazard, and a High Coalmine Hazard. As part of the application, the applicant is requesting a Critical Areas Exemption. If approved, the proposal would comply with the criterion. YES 3. Removal of a landmark tree shall meet the review criteria for removal off landmark tree, pursuant to RMC 4-4-130, Tree Retention and Land Clearing Regulations. Comments: No landmark trees are proposed for removal. YES, if condition of approval is complied with 4. Street frontage and parking lot trees and landscaping shall be preserved unless otherwise approved by the Administrator. Comments: According to the applicants TRAQ report, the London plane tree proposed for removal is located in a parking lot landscape island. In order to ensure the parking lot complies with the landscape requirements in RMC 4-4-070, staff recommends, as a condition of approval, the applicant shall install one new London plane tree, or an alternative tree species approved by the Current Planning Project Manager, after removal of the existing tree. The new tree shall be installed within 45 days of the tree removal. YES 5. The land clearing and tree removal shall not remove any landscaping or protected trees required as part of a land development permit. Comments: Not applicable. The original land development permit is not on file with the City due to the development of the site occurring prior to annexation. YES 6. The land clearing and tree removal shall maintain visual screening and buffering between land uses of differing intensity, consistent with applicable landscaping and setback provisions. Comments: The three (3) trees proposed for removal are spread out across the site and would not significantly reduce the visual screening or buffering between the condominium complex and the single-family homes to the west or Benson Rd S to the east. The minor pruning and crown clearing proposed will enable the trees to continue growing healthily and will improve the visual screening in the long term. In addition, the significant number of remaining trees on the site will continue to provide a robust tree canopy and screening element for residents of the complex. YES 7. The land clearing and tree removal shall not create or contribute to a hazardous condition, such as increased potential for blowdown, pest infestation, disease, or other problems that may result from selectively removing trees and other vegetation from a lot. Comments: The permit is requested in order to mitigate the danger of a high-risk trees and dead branches on healthy trees. The proposed work would not result in the increased potential for issues with the remaining trees and the removed trees represent a small fraction of the existing trees on the site. DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D City of Renton Department of Community & Economic Development Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption Echo Mountain Tree Maintenance LUA22-000429, RVMP, CAE Date of Permit: January 25, 2023 Page 4 of 4 D_RVMP and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v2_FINAL and CAE Decision_Echo Mountain_221229_v1 DECISION: The Echo Mountain Tree Maintenance Routine Vegetation Management Permit and Critical Areas Exemption is Approved with Conditions*. 1. The applicant shall install one (1) new London plane tree, or an alternative tree species approved by the Current Planning Project Manager, after removal of the existing tree. The new tree shall be installed within 45 days of the tree removal. SIGNATURE & DATE OF DECISION: ________________________________________ ____________________________________ Vanessa Dolbee, Planning Director Date RECONSIDERATION: Within 14 days of the decision date, any party may request that the decision be reopened by the approval body. The approval body may modify his decision if material evidence not readily discoverable prior to the original decision is found or if he finds there was misrepresentation or fact. After review of the Reconsideration request, if the approval body finds sufficient evidence to amend the original decision, there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action must file a formal appeal within the 14-day appeal time frame. APPEALS: Appeals of permit issuance must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. on February 8, 2023. Appeals must be submitted electronically to the City Clerk at cityclerk@rentonwa.gov or delivered to City Hall 1st floor Lobby Hub Monday through Friday. The appeal fee, normally due at the time an appeal is submitted, will be collected at a future date if your appeal is submitted electronically. The appeal submitted in person may be pai d on the first floor in our Finance Department. Appeals to the Hearing Examiner are governed by RMC 4 -8-110 and additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office, cityclerk@rentonwa.gov. EXPIRATION: The Routine Vegetation Management Permit shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance. An extension may be granted by the Planning Division for a period of one (1) year upon application by the property owner or manager. Application for such an extension must be made at 30 days in advance of the expiration of the original permit and shall include a statement of justification for the extension. Critical Areas Exemptions are valid five (5) years from the date of decision (date signed). Attachments: Tree Removal TRAQ Assessment, Tree Pruning TRAQ Assessment Tree Installation Plan, Tree Unit Calculation DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D 1/25/2023 | 10:24 AM PST General Tree Care & Plant Health Care Services Tree Line Name Treatment Bid ($) 1 Red Alder (Alnus rubra) [1001631766] 8.7" DBH. Dead. Edge of stand. Leaning over adjacent building approx. 1/3 Height away. High likelihood of failure and damage to roof, gutter & balcony. Permit Needed - Removal Removal 2 London Plane (Platanus X hispanica) [968378] 10.7" DBH. Fair. Cracking of adjacent drive aisle asphalt. Root Pruning not a viable option as target location is within 3x DBH of the tree. Tree located in Parking Lot Finger with uncorrected lean over drive aisle & parking. Permit Needed - Removal NO PARKING SIGNS REQUIRED Removal 3 Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta subsp. murrayana) [967479] 17.3" DBH. Fair. Tree at edge of Wildland-Urban interface. Tree crowded into adjacent building by surrounding native vegetation. 1 of 2 co-dominant leaders within 3" of roofline. Location and proximity to adjacent building constitutes a substantial fire hazard. Permit Needed - Removal Removal 4 European White Birch (Betula pendula) [1001026163] 11.4" DBH. Poor. Tree declining from reduced availability of water. Located on landscaped slope with little to no mulch or vegetative cover. Leaning toward & within falling distance of adjacent building. 5’ from building. 50% of canopy is dead. NO PARKING SIGNS REQUIRED Crown Clean 5 European White Birch (Betula pendula) [967526] 10" DBH. Poor. Dieback in upper crown. Leader already failed. Several other secondary & tertiary limbs dying. NO PARKING SIGNS REQUIRED Crown Clean Project Management Services Description Quantity Amount Subtotal Fuel Surcharge (5%) Environmental Waste Fees* (Waived if property chooses to keep onsite) Created:2022-11-18 15:40:52 Proposal ID:250464 Address:2223 Benson Rd S, Renton, WA 98055 PROPOSAL FOR ECHO MOUNTAIN 2022 / Recommend Removals / Echo Mountain / Avenue 5 Eric Mullin ISA CA#: WE-9864A ISA TRAQ Qualified Parcel: 3376750000 DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Removal Permit / Contract Fees (price subject to change based on city approval) Subtotal: Taxes: Definition of Treatments: Crown Clean - Removal of dead, dying, diseased, crossed, and weakly attached limbs to promote trees health, safety, and beauty. 2" in diameter or greater OR appropriate diameter and amount of wood removed is to be determined by Arborist or Representative. Includes any necessary clearance away from buildings and/or structures. Will not prune within 10 ft of overhead power lines. Removal - Complete removal of tree as close to ground level as is reasonable and safe, using safety practices as outlined in ANSI Z133.1 safety standard. NO PARKING SIGNS REQUIRED - In order to service this tree, it is imperative that no parking signs be set out and enforced so that this work can be performed safely and smoothly. Permit Needed - Removal - A tree removal permit is required on this tree in order to service this tree without violating municipal codes. DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D NSite Map DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D — Trunk — — Crown and Branches — — Roots and Root Collar — Unbalanced crown †LCR ______% Dead twigs/branches †____% overall Max. dia. ______ Broken/Hangers Number __________ Max. dia. ______ Over-extended branches † Pruning history Crown cleaned † Reduced † Flush cuts † Thinned † Topped † Other Raised † Lion-tailed † Cracks †___________________________________Lightning damage † Codominant †__________________________________Included bark † tĞĂŬĂƩĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ†___________________Cavity/Nest hole ____% circ. Previous branch failures †_______________ Similar branches present † Dead/Missing bark † Cankers/Galls/Burls † Sapwood damage/decay † Conks †  Heartwood decay †________________________ Response growth Collar buried/Not visible † Depth________ Stem girdling † Dead † Decay †Conks/Mushrooms † Ooze † Cavity † _____% circ. Cracks † Cut/Damaged roots †Distance from trunk _______ ZŽŽƚƉůĂƚĞůŝŌŝŶŐ† Soil weakness † Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ † Dead/Missing bark † Abnormal bark texture/color † Codominant stems † Included bark † Cracks † Sapwood damage/decay † Cankers/Galls/Burls †Sap ooze † Lightning damage † Heartwood decay † Conks/Mushrooms † Cavity/Nest hole _____ % circ. Depth _______ Poor taper † Lean _____° Corrected? ________________________________ Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ † Client _______________________________________________________________ Date___________________ Time_________________ ĚĚƌĞƐƐͬdƌĞĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dƌĞĞŶŽ͘ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ŚĞĞƚͺͺͺͺͺŽĨͺͺͺͺͺ Tree species _________________________________________ dbh_____________ Height ___________ Crown spread dia. ____________ Assessor(s) __________________________________________ Time frame_____________ Tools used______________________________ Target Assessment Target numberdĂƌŐĞƚĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶ WƌĂĐƟĐĂůƚŽ move target?ZĞƐƚƌŝĐƟŽŶƉƌĂĐƟĐĂů͍1 2 3 4 ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞƐ_____________________________________________________________ Topography Flat† Slope† _________% Aspect _____ Site changes None † Grade change † Site clearing † Changed soil hydrology † Root cuts † Describe _____________________________________ ^ŽŝůĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ Limited volume† Saturated † Shallow† Compacted† Pavement over roots † ______% Describe __________________________ WƌĞǀĂŝůŝŶŐǁŝŶĚĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶ ______ ŽŵŵŽŶǁĞĂƚŚĞƌ Strong winds † Ice † Snow † Heavy rain † Describe______________________________ dƌĞĞ,ĞĂůƚŚĂŶĚ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐWƌŽĮůĞ Vigor Low † Normal† High† &ŽůŝĂŐĞ None (seasonal)† None (dead)†EŽƌŵĂůͺͺͺͺͺйŚůŽƌŽƟĐͺͺͺͺͺйEĞĐƌŽƟĐͺͺͺͺͺй Pests _____________________________________________________ ďŝŽƟĐ________________________________________________________ ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐĨĂŝůƵƌĞƉƌŽĮůĞ Branches † Trunk † Roots † Describe ____________________________________________________________________ Load Factors Wind exposure Protected †WĂƌƟĂů † Full † Wind funneling † ________________________ ZĞůĂƟǀĞĐƌŽǁŶƐŝnjĞ Small † Medium † Large † ƌŽǁŶĚĞŶƐŝƚLJ Sparse † Normal † Dense † Interior branches Few† Normal † Dense † sŝŶĞƐͬDŝƐƚůĞƚŽĞͬDŽƐƐ † _____________________ ZĞĐĞŶƚŽƌƉůĂŶŶĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶůŽĂĚĨĂĐƚŽƌƐ ________________________________________________________________________________________ _ dƌĞĞĞĨĞĐƚƐĂŶĚŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐīĞĐƟŶŐƚŚĞ>ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ Occupancy rate 1–rare 2 – occasional 3 – frequent 4 – constant >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ>ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ ĂƐŝĐdƌĞĞZŝƐŬƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ&Žƌŵ Page 1 of 2 Site Factors dĂƌŐĞƚnjŽŶĞ dĂƌŐĞƚǁŝƚŚŝŶ ĚƌŝƉůŝŶĞ Target ǁŝƚŚŝŶϭdž,ƚ͘dĂƌŐĞƚǁŝƚŚŝŶϭ͘ϱdž,ƚ͘Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ† >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ Improbable † Possible † Probable † Imminent † Improbable † Possible †Probable †Imminent †Improbable † Possible †Probable †Imminent † Echo Mountain Apartments 10/18/2022 12:15 PM 2223 Benson Rd S, Renton, WA 98055 AP 1001631766 Red Alder (Alnus rubra) 8.7” 55’15’ Eric Mullin 1yr Visual Typically related to root/basal rot or root plate failure. Failures tend to occur between 0-24’ above grade. N N ■ ✔ ✔ ■■ Building ■■ 4 Pedestrians 1 None visible ■ ■ SE ■ ■ ■■ ■■ Potential seasonal snow/ice load factors. N 100■2 S N Small diameter limb failures over adjacent structure & unprotected balcony. ■ ■ ■ 5 No Around stem wound @3’. stand. Species failure profile & proximity to building. Dead Tree. Leaning toward building. Edge of Buttresses on only 2/3 of root crown. obstruction below grade. Species failure profile. Dead tree. Possible girdling root or ■■ ■ TREE 1DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D ϭ 2 3 4 Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚ ŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ/ŵƉĂĐƟŶŐdĂƌŐĞƚ sĞƌLJůŽǁ >Žǁ Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely WƌŽďĂďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely WŽƐƐŝďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely /ŵƉƌŽďĂďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely UnlikelyŽŶĚŝƟŽŶŶƵŵďĞƌWĂƌƚƐŝnjĞ&ĂůůĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞTarget ƉƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶ ŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ of concern &ĂŝůƵƌĞ Impact &ĂŝůƵƌĞΘ/ŵƉĂĐƚ (from Matrix 1) >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚ /ŵƉƌŽďĂďůĞImminentWŽƐƐŝďůĞsĞƌLJůŽǁhŶůŝŬĞůLJEĞŐůŝŐŝďůĞMedium>ŝŬĞůLJ^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚWƌŽďĂďůĞ>Žǁ^ŽŵĞǁŚĂƚMinorHighsĞƌLJůŝŬĞůLJSevereConsequences ZŝƐŬ ƌĂƟŶŐ of part (from Matrix 2)Tree part >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ &ĂŝůƵƌĞΘ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ŽŶƐĞƋƵĞŶĐĞƐŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ EĞŐůŝŐŝďůĞMinor ^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ Severe sĞƌLJůŝŬĞůLJ Low Moderate High Extreme >ŝŬĞůLJ Low Moderate High High ^ŽŵĞǁŚĂƚůŝŬĞůLJ Low Low Moderate Moderate hŶůŝŬĞůLJ Low Low Low Low Data †Final † Preliminary Advanced assessment needed †No †Yes-Type/Reason ________________________________________________ /ŶƐƉĞĐƟŽŶůŝŵŝƚĂƟŽŶƐ †None †Visibility †Access †Vines †Root collar buried Describe ___________________________________________ EŽƚĞƐ͕ĞdžƉůĂŶĂƟŽŶƐ͕ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶƐ DŝƟŐĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐ _____________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ KǀĞƌĂůůƚƌĞĞƌŝƐŬƌĂƟŶŐLow † Moderate † High † Extreme † tŽƌŬƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJ1 † 2 † 3 † 4 † KǀĞƌĂůůƌĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ Low † Moderate † High † Extreme †ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚŝŶƐƉĞĐƟŽŶŝŶƚĞƌǀĂů __________________ is datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Quali ed (TRAQ) arborists – 2013 North Page 2 of 2 Matrix 2. Risk rating matrix. ZŝƐŬĂƚĞŐŽƌŝnjĂƟŽŶ Target number 40’2 None LowBranches 20’ 3-4”55’2 1 2”1 None 2” 15’Dead brittle limbs over adjacent building balcony Roots Dead roots suseptible to rots & high annual precipitation rate 3-4”None None Low High Low 20’1 None HighTrunkDead trunk suseptible to rots & high annual precipitation rate 8.7” 8.7”55’2 None Low NoneRemoval ■■ ■■ ■ ■ TREE 1DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D — Trunk — — Crown and Branches — — Roots and Root Collar — Unbalanced crown †LCR ______% Dead twigs/branches †____% overall Max. dia. ______ Broken/Hangers Number __________ Max. dia. ______ Over-extended branches † Pruning history Crown cleaned † Reduced † Flush cuts † Thinned † Topped † Other Raised † Lion-tailed † Cracks †___________________________________Lightning damage † Codominant †__________________________________Included bark † tĞĂŬĂƩĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ†___________________Cavity/Nest hole ____% circ. Previous branch failures †_______________ Similar branches present † Dead/Missing bark † Cankers/Galls/Burls † Sapwood damage/decay † Conks †  Heartwood decay †________________________ Response growth Collar buried/Not visible † Depth________ Stem girdling † Dead † Decay †Conks/Mushrooms † Ooze † Cavity † _____% circ. Cracks † Cut/Damaged roots †Distance from trunk _______ ZŽŽƚƉůĂƚĞůŝŌŝŶŐ† Soil weakness † Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ † Dead/Missing bark † Abnormal bark texture/color † Codominant stems † Included bark † Cracks † Sapwood damage/decay † Cankers/Galls/Burls †Sap ooze † Lightning damage † Heartwood decay † Conks/Mushrooms † Cavity/Nest hole _____ % circ. Depth _______ Poor taper † Lean _____° Corrected? ________________________________ Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ † Client _______________________________________________________________ Date___________________ Time_________________ ĚĚƌĞƐƐͬdƌĞĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dƌĞĞŶŽ͘ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ŚĞĞƚͺͺͺͺͺŽĨͺͺͺͺͺ Tree species _________________________________________ dbh_____________ Height ___________ Crown spread dia. ____________ Assessor(s) __________________________________________ Time frame_____________ Tools used______________________________ Target Assessment Target numberdĂƌŐĞƚĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶ WƌĂĐƟĐĂůƚŽ move target?ZĞƐƚƌŝĐƟŽŶƉƌĂĐƟĐĂů͍1 2 3 4 ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞƐ_____________________________________________________________ Topography Flat† Slope† _________% Aspect _____ Site changes None † Grade change † Site clearing † Changed soil hydrology † Root cuts † Describe _____________________________________ ^ŽŝůĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ Limited volume† Saturated † Shallow† Compacted† Pavement over roots † ______% Describe __________________________ WƌĞǀĂŝůŝŶŐǁŝŶĚĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶ ______ ŽŵŵŽŶǁĞĂƚŚĞƌ Strong winds † Ice † Snow † Heavy rain † Describe______________________________ dƌĞĞ,ĞĂůƚŚĂŶĚ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐWƌŽĮůĞ Vigor Low † Normal† High† &ŽůŝĂŐĞ None (seasonal)† None (dead)†EŽƌŵĂůͺͺͺͺͺйŚůŽƌŽƟĐͺͺͺͺͺйEĞĐƌŽƟĐͺͺͺͺͺй Pests _____________________________________________________ ďŝŽƟĐ________________________________________________________ ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐĨĂŝůƵƌĞƉƌŽĮůĞ Branches † Trunk † Roots † Describe ____________________________________________________________________ Load Factors Wind exposure Protected †WĂƌƟĂů † Full † Wind funneling † ________________________ ZĞůĂƟǀĞĐƌŽǁŶƐŝnjĞ Small † Medium † Large † ƌŽǁŶĚĞŶƐŝƚLJ Sparse † Normal † Dense † Interior branches Few† Normal † Dense † sŝŶĞƐͬDŝƐƚůĞƚŽĞͬDŽƐƐ † _____________________ ZĞĐĞŶƚŽƌƉůĂŶŶĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶůŽĂĚĨĂĐƚŽƌƐ ________________________________________________________________________________________ _ dƌĞĞĞĨĞĐƚƐĂŶĚŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐīĞĐƟŶŐƚŚĞ>ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ Occupancy rate 1–rare 2 – occasional 3 – frequent 4 – constant >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ>ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ ĂƐŝĐdƌĞĞZŝƐŬƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ&Žƌŵ Page 1 of 2 Site Factors dĂƌŐĞƚnjŽŶĞ dĂƌŐĞƚǁŝƚŚŝŶ ĚƌŝƉůŝŶĞ Target ǁŝƚŚŝŶϭdž,ƚ͘dĂƌŐĞƚǁŝƚŚŝŶϭ͘ϱdž,ƚ͘Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ† >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ Improbable † Possible † Probable † Imminent † Improbable † Possible †Probable †Imminent †Improbable † Possible †Probable †Imminent † Echo Mountain Apartments 10/18/2022 12:15 PM 2223 Benson Rd S, Renton, WA 98055 AP 968378 London Plane (Platanus x hispanica)10.7”35’15’ Eric Mullin 1yr Visual Seasonal heat stress as well as reflected & radiant heat from surrounding asphalt. Typically small diameter interior limbs shed naturally. Limb & trunk failures from weight management. 15 Seasonal AC Parking Lot N N ■ ✔ ✔ ■ ■■ Vehicles 3 Pedestrians 1 None visible ■ ■■■75 SE ■ ■85 ■■ ■■ Potential seasonal snow/ice load factors. N 5 40 ■1/2 S N ■ Small diameter limb failures over parked vehicles and/or pedestrians. Low LCR. Uneven weight distribution. ■ ■ 18 No. Sweeping lean. Minimal use area. Lack of correction in trunk lean over high- Proximity to target pruning zone to remediate hardscape damage. Lack of response growth on tension-side. ■■ ■ TREE 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D ϭ 2 3 4 Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚ ŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ/ŵƉĂĐƟŶŐdĂƌŐĞƚ sĞƌLJůŽǁ >Žǁ Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely WƌŽďĂďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely WŽƐƐŝďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely /ŵƉƌŽďĂďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely UnlikelyŽŶĚŝƟŽŶŶƵŵďĞƌWĂƌƚƐŝnjĞ&ĂůůĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞTarget ƉƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶ ŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ of concern &ĂŝůƵƌĞ Impact &ĂŝůƵƌĞΘ/ŵƉĂĐƚ (from Matrix 1) >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚ /ŵƉƌŽďĂďůĞImminentWŽƐƐŝďůĞsĞƌLJůŽǁhŶůŝŬĞůLJEĞŐůŝŐŝďůĞMedium>ŝŬĞůLJ^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚWƌŽďĂďůĞ>Žǁ^ŽŵĞǁŚĂƚMinorHighsĞƌLJůŝŬĞůLJSevereConsequences ZŝƐŬ ƌĂƟŶŐ of part (from Matrix 2)Tree part >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ &ĂŝůƵƌĞΘ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ŽŶƐĞƋƵĞŶĐĞƐŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ EĞŐůŝŐŝďůĞMinor ^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ Severe sĞƌLJůŝŬĞůLJ Low Moderate High Extreme >ŝŬĞůLJ Low Moderate High High ^ŽŵĞǁŚĂƚůŝŬĞůLJ Low Low Moderate Moderate hŶůŝŬĞůLJ Low Low Low Low Data †Final † Preliminary Advanced assessment needed †No †Yes-Type/Reason ________________________________________________ /ŶƐƉĞĐƟŽŶůŝŵŝƚĂƟŽŶƐ †None †Visibility †Access †Vines †Root collar buried Describe ___________________________________________ EŽƚĞƐ͕ĞdžƉůĂŶĂƟŽŶƐ͕ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶƐ DŝƟŐĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐ _____________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ KǀĞƌĂůůƚƌĞĞƌŝƐŬƌĂƟŶŐLow † Moderate † High † Extreme † tŽƌŬƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJ1 † 2 † 3 † 4 † KǀĞƌĂůůƌĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ Low † Moderate † High † Extreme †ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚŝŶƐƉĞĐƟŽŶŝŶƚĞƌǀĂů __________________ is datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Quali ed (TRAQ) arborists – 2013 North Page 2 of 2 Matrix 2. Risk rating matrix. ZŝƐŬĂƚĞŐŽƌŝnjĂƟŽŶ Target number 25’2 None HighTrunk 2 1 10.7”1 None 10.7” 25’Lack of correction in trunk lean over high- use area. Roots Lack of response growth on tension- side. None None Low High Low Pruning of branches for weight mitigation is not a viable option due to existing low LCR. Pruning of roots to mitigate hardscape damage is not viable due to other existing structural defects, proximity of target pruning area related to size of the tree & resulting decrease in structural stability. NoneRemoval ■■ ■■ ■ ■ TREE 2 3-5” 3-5”25’ 25’ DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D — Trunk — — Crown and Branches — — Roots and Root Collar — Unbalanced crown †LCR ______% Dead twigs/branches †____% overall Max. dia. ______ Broken/Hangers Number __________ Max. dia. ______ Over-extended branches † Pruning history Crown cleaned † Reduced † Flush cuts † Thinned † Topped † Other Raised † Lion-tailed † Cracks †___________________________________Lightning damage † Codominant †__________________________________Included bark † tĞĂŬĂƩĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐ†___________________Cavity/Nest hole ____% circ. Previous branch failures †_______________ Similar branches present † Dead/Missing bark † Cankers/Galls/Burls † Sapwood damage/decay † Conks †  Heartwood decay †________________________ Response growth Collar buried/Not visible † Depth________ Stem girdling † Dead † Decay †Conks/Mushrooms † Ooze † Cavity † _____% circ. Cracks † Cut/Damaged roots †Distance from trunk _______ ZŽŽƚƉůĂƚĞůŝŌŝŶŐ† Soil weakness † Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ † Dead/Missing bark † Abnormal bark texture/color † Codominant stems † Included bark † Cracks † Sapwood damage/decay † Cankers/Galls/Burls †Sap ooze † Lightning damage † Heartwood decay † Conks/Mushrooms † Cavity/Nest hole _____ % circ. Depth _______ Poor taper † Lean _____° Corrected? ________________________________ Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ † Client _______________________________________________________________ Date___________________ Time_________________ ĚĚƌĞƐƐͬdƌĞĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ dƌĞĞŶŽ͘ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ^ŚĞĞƚͺͺͺͺͺŽĨͺͺͺͺͺ Tree species _________________________________________ dbh_____________ Height ___________ Crown spread dia. ____________ Assessor(s) __________________________________________ Time frame_____________ Tools used______________________________ Target Assessment Target numberdĂƌŐĞƚĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶ WƌĂĐƟĐĂůƚŽ move target?ZĞƐƚƌŝĐƟŽŶƉƌĂĐƟĐĂů͍1 2 3 4 ,ŝƐƚŽƌLJŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞƐ_____________________________________________________________ Topography Flat† Slope† _________% Aspect _____ Site changes None † Grade change † Site clearing † Changed soil hydrology † Root cuts † Describe _____________________________________ ^ŽŝůĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ Limited volume† Saturated † Shallow† Compacted† Pavement over roots † ______% Describe __________________________ WƌĞǀĂŝůŝŶŐǁŝŶĚĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶ ______ ŽŵŵŽŶǁĞĂƚŚĞƌ Strong winds † Ice † Snow † Heavy rain † Describe______________________________ dƌĞĞ,ĞĂůƚŚĂŶĚ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐWƌŽĮůĞ Vigor Low † Normal† High† &ŽůŝĂŐĞ None (seasonal)† None (dead)†EŽƌŵĂůͺͺͺͺͺйŚůŽƌŽƟĐͺͺͺͺͺйEĞĐƌŽƟĐͺͺͺͺͺй Pests _____________________________________________________ ďŝŽƟĐ________________________________________________________ ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐĨĂŝůƵƌĞƉƌŽĮůĞ Branches † Trunk † Roots † Describe ____________________________________________________________________ Load Factors Wind exposure Protected †WĂƌƟĂů † Full † Wind funneling † ________________________ ZĞůĂƟǀĞĐƌŽǁŶƐŝnjĞ Small † Medium † Large † ƌŽǁŶĚĞŶƐŝƚLJ Sparse † Normal † Dense † Interior branches Few† Normal † Dense † sŝŶĞƐͬDŝƐƚůĞƚŽĞͬDŽƐƐ † _____________________ ZĞĐĞŶƚŽƌƉůĂŶŶĞĚĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶůŽĂĚĨĂĐƚŽƌƐ ________________________________________________________________________________________ _ dƌĞĞĞĨĞĐƚƐĂŶĚŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐīĞĐƟŶŐƚŚĞ>ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ Occupancy rate 1–rare 2 – occasional 3 – frequent 4 – constant >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ>ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ ĂƐŝĐdƌĞĞZŝƐŬƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ&Žƌŵ Page 1 of 2 Site Factors dĂƌŐĞƚnjŽŶĞ dĂƌŐĞƚǁŝƚŚŝŶ ĚƌŝƉůŝŶĞ Target ǁŝƚŚŝŶϭdž,ƚ͘dĂƌŐĞƚǁŝƚŚŝŶϭ͘ϱdž,ƚ͘Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A † Minor † Moderate †^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ† >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨĨĂŝůƵƌĞ Improbable † Possible † Probable † Imminent † Improbable † Possible †Probable †Imminent †Improbable † Possible †Probable †Imminent † Echo Mountain Apartments 10/18/2022 12:15 PM 2223 Benson Rd S, Renton, WA 98055 AP 967479 Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta subsp. murrayana)17.3”60’25’ Eric Mullin 1yr Visual Limb failures due to weak attachments. Stem failures due to low LCR & overloading. Seasonal N N ■ ✔ ✔ ■ ■ ■■ Building 4 Pedestrians 1 None visible ■ ■ SE ■ ■100 ■ ■■ Potential seasonal snow/ice load factors. N 25 Codominant union @ 30-35’ ■Codominant union S N ■ Codominant union @ 3rd-story roof level. Codominant stems within one (1) foot of roof line. High likelihood of failure. Proximity to structure presents a fire hazard. Removal or cabling of co-dominant stem will not correct other safety concerns. ■ ■ ■ 8 Yes. Around 35’ Minimal makes it difficult to add necessary response growth. Lean & proximity to adjacent structure. Low LCR Additional growth on buttress roots. crown on N-side Girdling root causing lack of taper in root ■■ ■■ TREE 3DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D ϭ 2 3 4 Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚ ŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ/ŵƉĂĐƟŶŐdĂƌŐĞƚ sĞƌLJůŽǁ >Žǁ Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely WƌŽďĂďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely WŽƐƐŝďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely /ŵƉƌŽďĂďůĞ Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely UnlikelyŽŶĚŝƟŽŶŶƵŵďĞƌWĂƌƚƐŝnjĞ&ĂůůĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞTarget ƉƌŽƚĞĐƟŽŶ ŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ of concern &ĂŝůƵƌĞ Impact &ĂŝůƵƌĞΘ/ŵƉĂĐƚ (from Matrix 1) >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚ /ŵƉƌŽďĂďůĞImminentWŽƐƐŝďůĞsĞƌLJůŽǁhŶůŝŬĞůLJEĞŐůŝŐŝďůĞMedium>ŝŬĞůLJ^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚWƌŽďĂďůĞ>Žǁ^ŽŵĞǁŚĂƚMinorHighsĞƌLJůŝŬĞůLJSevereConsequences ZŝƐŬ ƌĂƟŶŐ of part (from Matrix 2)Tree part >ŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ &ĂŝůƵƌĞΘ/ŵƉĂĐƚ ŽŶƐĞƋƵĞŶĐĞƐŽĨ&ĂŝůƵƌĞ EĞŐůŝŐŝďůĞMinor ^ŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ Severe sĞƌLJůŝŬĞůLJ Low Moderate High Extreme >ŝŬĞůLJ Low Moderate High High ^ŽŵĞǁŚĂƚůŝŬĞůLJ Low Low Moderate Moderate hŶůŝŬĞůLJ Low Low Low Low Data †Final † Preliminary Advanced assessment needed †No †Yes-Type/Reason ________________________________________________ /ŶƐƉĞĐƟŽŶůŝŵŝƚĂƟŽŶƐ †None †Visibility †Access †Vines †Root collar buried Describe ___________________________________________ EŽƚĞƐ͕ĞdžƉůĂŶĂƟŽŶƐ͕ĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƟŽŶƐ DŝƟŐĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐ _____________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ZĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ ________ KǀĞƌĂůůƚƌĞĞƌŝƐŬƌĂƟŶŐLow † Moderate † High † Extreme † tŽƌŬƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJ1 † 2 † 3 † 4 † KǀĞƌĂůůƌĞƐŝĚƵĂůƌŝƐŬ Low † Moderate † High † Extreme †ZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚŝŶƐƉĞĐƟŽŶŝŶƚĞƌǀĂů __________________ is datasheet was produced by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Quali ed (TRAQ) arborists – 2013 North Page 2 of 2 Matrix 2. Risk rating matrix. ZŝƐŬĂƚĞŐŽƌŝnjĂƟŽŶ Target number 60’2 None ModTrunk 1’ 3”60’2 1 17.3”1 None 17.3” 1’Lean & proximity to adjacent structure. Low LCR. Roots Girdling Root Causing lack of taper in root crown. 3”None None Low Mod Low 30’1 None HighCo- dominant stem Weak structural union with ever increasing liklihood of failure. 8” 8”60’2 None Low Due to additional situational factors cabling, removal or subordination of co-dominant stem will not resolve issue of proximity of tree to adjacent building for clearance for both defensible space or maintenance requirements. NoneRemoval ■■ ■■ ■ ■ TREE 3DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Tree 1 (See accompanying TRAQ Report) DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Tree 2 (See accompanying TRAQ Report) DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Tree 3 (See accompanying TRAQ Report) DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D                        ! " !  #!! "  !#  $%      ! " ! $            & '"(    !)& )*+*  "( + ,"## #!#"#*+*+  !"-. #  / !. "#   ! 0 "#       $! " !  #1 *$121+ ""! ,1 +$ 3##!!1 $!"4#&54 "503 *2++ 466&3'6478696:;/3; <4 "--#  <7 "9"  <3+  Eric Mullin ISA CA#: WE-9864A ISA TRAQ Qualified Parcel: 3376750000 DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D  ,"## #!#"#*++  -#""     $! " ! % ," !'  !#" ! -= ! * 4 !">     "(4 ! 2 "# "   ! " " !.!- *2  "( * ,"## #!#"#* 4""     $! " !  ? 9 3    -*  !"-. #   !! !  !     $! " !  ,"## #!#"#2+      $! " !  & "    !!!  !+*+      $! " ! $ ? 9 3    -+*                DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D  ,"## #!#"#$%      $! " ! + 0! " "(""# "!  " *2$+% 4# ( """ 0 4# "   ,"## #!#"#$$$+2      $! " ! % ? 9 3    -$%%  #!  !      2 & '"(    !)& )*2$% >        * ? 9 3    -+*2         & '"(    !)& )+**      ,"## #!#"#+*      $! " !            DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D  ,"## #!#"#      $! " ! $ 4#3# 3!.*      $! " !  ? 9 3    -$%22     + & '"(    !)& )*2$%$  "-    & '"(    !)& )+*        % ,"## #!#"#$%*      $! " ! 2 4#3# 3!.$%*      $! " ! * & '"(    !)& )$2 4"# #>                DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D $ ? 9 3    -$2     $ "# "   ! " " !.!- $2*   #"( $  9 3 - " -$2      $! " ! $$ & '"(    !)& )*2$$%  "-   $ "#"  !@ ! *2$%+ 4 !""#   "(4 ! $+ & "    !!!  !+*%  "(4 ! $ ,"## #!#"#*2$2      ! " ! $% ? 9 3    -$2+      ! " !            DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D $2 & "    !!!  !$2+  "( $* "#"  !@ ! *2$%  "-    ,"## #!#"#$$$* >     "(4 !  "# "   ! " " !.!- +*%   #"(  ,"## #!#"#$2      ! " ! $ & '"(    !)& )*2$**  "-    ? 9 3    -$22%      ! " ! + ,"## #!#"#$2*  "(4 !            DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D  ,"## #!#"#$*%      ! " ! % ,"## #!#"#$* 4""     ! " ! 2 ? 9 3    -$*%      ! " ! * & "    !!!  !$*$   #"( +     !*+*  "( + ,"## #!#"#      ! " ! + "#"  !@ ! *2$      ! " ! +$ 0! 4## / A  $*+%      ! " ! + - ! ! *2 4"#                 DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D ++ & '"(    !)& )*2  "-   + & '"(    !)& )$*  "-   +% 3!     ! *2  "( +2 ? 9 3    -*%*     +* "# "   ! " " !.!- *%* 4""# -     $! " !  "# "   ! " " !.!- *%2*   #"(  3!     ! +   #"(  0! 4## / A  *%%      $! " !            DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D $ 7"0     #*%2      $! " !  0! 4## / A  *%2$        +  9 3 - " -$**+      $! " !  "#"  !@ ! *%%      ! " ! % 4#3# 3!.+%  -.     $! " ! 2 3!     ! *%2  -     $! " ! * 3!     ! *%%   #"( % "# "   ! " " !.!- $$   #"(            DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D % "# "   ! " " !.!- *%+%      $! " ! % "# "   ! " " !.!- $      $! " ! %$ "# "   ! " " !.!- *%++  !  """# -     $! " ! % "# "   ! " " !.!- *%+      $! " ! %+ "# "   ! " " !.!- *%+   #"( % 7"0     #*%    )"""     $! " ! %%," !'  !#" ! -= ! *%      $! " ! %2  9 3 - " -$$$      $! " !            DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D %* "# "   ! " " !.!- *%    ". #  #""     $! " ! 2 - ! ! *+$22  &    2 "#"  !@ ! *+$2*      $! " ! 2 - ! ! *%+  &    2$ 0! 4## / A  *%++      ! " ! 2 "# "   ! " " !.!- $%$      $! " !               ! "#  $%# #&   '&   +B 7 "- 0! '!C 0 # "  ""!! ">"!  7 "- 0! '! 0 #   - <"  '!  !.A  "  .!#" " #&  ' (' ) )  ' * 4-""##5#  5# !!#5 "!!#5#(>  # -.! ""-"  !  5! 5#. D  # - "  64"  # - #-" "(""#-"# ! ".# - #.3." ! "4!   #!  !!  ("-. #  !#<"!  !0 " (  "" #"( ! DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D *+7 """(!  -.! "  !" #    "! "#. ! B5!-# - . !" "( > " "     #! !!  ("-. #  !#<"!  !  # # #3  - "# "##!!!  # !#"-"  ""#!  "  "( '"7E   ! !   -  >1,""! " #"-  ### #( F'",   !#   !1 "  ! "#. !  ## #( /"!"  ###(""#-"#  ("-. #  !#<"!  !0 " (   "" #"( ! ,-  #   !   #-"". ! "" #-  --"$ "-. #  <!  !52  "! #(>!5#2 "-""!5 ""#(!0 "    !(  ""( ! ,-  #.    !   #-"". ! "" #-  --"$ "- . #  <!  !52 "! #(>!5#2 "-""!5 ""#(!0 "    !(  ""( ! ,-  #/    !   #-"". ! "" #-  --"$ "- . #  <!  !52 "! #(>!5#2 "-""!5 ""#(!0 "    !(  ""( ! ,,-  *   !  "! ! "!    "-" ""(  1##5# !!#5#<"."> . !"G# - " "(! ! > "(  #! ##  1$ "-. #  #!  !52 " ! #(>52  "-""!5# " "#(0 "    !(  ""( ! ,,,- !  #3 "-   "  " -"  5!  !#!  / !  #! =## "   5-"  ##(""#5    5-""(! ! > "( 5#( # "(  !!5#   "##!! !  # !( "!! .3   " ""- "3;&3$ #!   ! ##!0 " (  "" #"(  ! 0 +#  #   -# #   #( ""E ## -.!#. ! "#   > ""#".  9 "!  # ! " #( "-   !  !(0 " (  "" #"( ! DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Site Map - Full N DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Site Map - North end enlargement N DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Site Map - South end enlargement N DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Echo Mountain Parcel: 3376750000 Tree Unit Calculation - June 2022 Species DBH Range (Inches) # of Trees Currently Tree Unit Total Units European Beech 1-3 0 European White Birch 1-3 0 Paperbark Maple 1-3 0 Red Alder 1-3 0 Vine Maple 1-3 0 Big Leaf Maple 3-6 1 0 0 Douglas Fir 3-6 0 Hinoki Cypress 3-6 0 Japanese Maple 3-6 0 Leyland Cypress 3-6 0 Lodgepole Pine 3-6 0 Paper Birch 3-6 0 Red Alder 3-6 2 0 0 Spruce 3-6 0 Vine Maple 3-6 0 Western Cottonwood 3-6 0 Austrian Pine 6-12 4 4 16 Big Leaf Maple 6-12 13 4 52 Birch 6-12 4 4 16 Cherry 6-12 6 4 24 Deodar Cedar 6-12 11 4 44 Douglas Fir 6-12 12 4 48 European White Birch 6-12 6 4 24 Lodgepole Pine 6-12 22 4 88 London Plane 6-12 4 4 16 Paper Birch 6-12 2 4 8 Purple Leaf Plum 6-12 10 4 40 Red Alder 6-12 14 4 56 Scotch Pine 6-12 5 4 20 Spire Flowering Cherry 6-12 4 4 16 Spruce 6-12 1 4 4 Vine Maple 6-12 9 4 36 Western Cottonwood 6-12 6 4 24 Western Red Cedar 6-12 7 4 28 Austrian Pine 12-18 8 6 48 Big Leaf Maple 12-18 3 6 18 Birch 12-18 1 6 6 Cherry 12-18 1 6 6 Deodar Cedar 12-18 38 6 228 DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Douglas Fir 12-18 17 6 102 European White Birch 12-18 1 6 6 Lodgepole Pine 12-18 25 6 150 London Plane 12-18 33 6 198 Mountain Ash 12-18 1 6 6 Pine 12-18 3 6 18 Purple Leaf Plum 12-18 1 6 6 Red Alder 12-18 3 6 18 Scotch Pine 12-18 2 6 12 Spire Flowering Cherry 12-18 10 6 60 Western Cottonwood 12-18 5 6 30 Western Red Cedar 12-18 7 6 42 Lodgepole Pine 18-24 2 8 16 London Plane 18-24 3 8 24 Spire Flowering Cherry 18-24 1 8 8 Western Cottonwood 18-24 5 8 40 Big Leaf Maple 30-36 5 12 60 Total Units: 1662 Tree Units to be Removed Species and Tree ID DBH Tree Count Tree Units Total Units Red Alder (1001631766) 6-12 1 4.0 4.0 London Plane (968378) 6-12 1 4.0 4.0 Lodgepole Pine (967479) 12-18 1 6.0 6.0 Total tree units to be removed: 14.0 Current inventoried tree units: 1662 Remaining tree units after removals: 1648.0 Required Tree Units Parcel # Lot size (sq ft) sq ft to acre Units/Acr e Required Units 3376750000 702,599 43560 30 484 Total Required Tree Units 484 Please Note: This document includes all individualy inventoried trees as of June, 2022 to illustrate tree unit retention compliance on the property. This DOES NOT include all trees, such as those marked as "grove of trees" in the current inventory, nor all the trees that are in the large forested area surrounding the wetland and stream associat ed with this parcel; this is NOT an exhaustive inventory. Some tree sizes may be undervalued and there may be some errors due to work performed by other companies. Regardless of the potential errors, this inventory underestimates the actual tree units on t he property as not all forested areas are completely inventoried. DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Site Inventory Map - North end DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Site Inventory Map - South end DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D Parcel Map DocuSign Envelope ID: 55B339A7-0A89-4A08-8E0C-FEA908A71F3D