Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA66-288 • • • • INTER-OFFICE MEMO • • • To: Gordon Ericksen„ Planning Director Date December 16„ 1966 From: Helmie Nelson, City Clerk • • • , We are holding in 'our pending files the following Rezone proposals which have been referred back to the Planning Commission by Council. May we please have , planning commission action taken on these matters. ' Rezone: Michael R. Mastro R-286-66 submitted to Council March 7th end referred back to the Commis©ion pending revision of the Comprehensive Plan© and leaps. (Filed with Planning 2-9-66)' Walt & June Dragin, R-271-66, submitted March 9th and referred • • back to the Commission. (Filed with Planning 1. -66) Ralph Richardson R-288-660 submitted and referred back to • `. • Commission on March 7, 1966. (Filed with Planning 1-19-66) He lmie •• 1 . • de . c�C ilC4C+. - ‘e-y-ii-c--" 6;v4 1.“,etet, . dJ March 9, 1966 Mr. Ralph Richardson 419 North 49th Avenue Yakima, Washington Dear Sir: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of March 7, 1966 has referred your rezone request back to the Planning Commission inasmuch as the proposed zoning is not in accord with the City's Comprehensive Plan and maps. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Helmie W. Nelson, City Clerk HWN/dm 697 • • rk,, — • ' 6.t \II ',2111L4fi 3/74 1/4\ ',If ;'4F1t...` R`Pullt(r°IrD Wp),,„;:,A,A 92, islOW S URI G T 0 R9 the Jet Transport Capital of the World fi ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT v.„ • March 7 , 1966 )1.:14Lth. ..-U141U Honorable Donald W. Custer, Mayor Members of the City Council Re : Actions of the Planning Commission • Public Hearing meeting Feb. 23 , 1966 Gentlemen and Mrs . Dahlquist : The Planning Commission at its public hearing meet- ing of February 23 , 1966 recommended to the City Council for, further action the following items : ' 1. PLATS : (1) PRELIMINARY PLAT ROLLING HILLS' NO. 3 , Appl. No. S-279-66 , area bounded by Puget Drive, 116th Ave. SE and SE 160th Street. The Preliminary Plat is the 3rd stage develop- ment proposed for single family -residential' use. The proposed plat is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. . . The Planning Commis- sion recommends adoption of the Preliminary Plat as presented, provided the cul de sacs shown as 40 ' be changed to. 50 ' in width in accordance with Ordinance requirements . • 2 . REZONE APPLICATIONS : ( 1) Michael Mastro , Appl. No. R-286-66 , rezone • request from R-3 to B-1 , property located on the Benson Rd. north of 'SE 168th Street. The proposed use would be an extension of an existing B-1 use located on the north- east corner of the intersection of Benson Rd. and SE 168th Street. The Comprehensive Plan indicates the use in this area would be multiple family residential. The pro- posed use is considered feasible for . a neigh- borhood type shopping facility. The Plan- ning Commission recommended approval of the rezone request , subject to change of the Comprehensive Land Use Map to reflect a r012) business use. ( 2) Ralph Richardson, Appl. No. R-288-66 , request fe! -1- : _ March ,7 , 1966 _ 2. REZONES CONTINUED (2) 'Continued:, ., for::rezone from G-7200 to B-1,. property 'loca- • tedr at the -intersection, of the SE corner. of... Benson .Rd. and.:Se- Z66th Street: =The proposed use of..this property, is for an automotive service station. ': .The Comprehensive Plan .in- id dicates this .area. as: multiple family- 'res en-; ' . - tial`,use.:. •,'The :lo•cation, however, appears to be a logical , business:, use area. The Planning Commission, recommended approval of the rezone • • request, Contingent ,upon the change of the : - • ComZrehensive Plan to reflect the proposed " " • . • ( 3) I . E. St... ,.Clair., Apph.': No.,..R-289-66 ;.._request.: for rezone_-from -R-1' :to .R=.3 ,'''property.•located on. .10th Place ._North and Sunset, Boulevard, East. The proposed use .would be an extension :of,`an existing apartment zoning. .• The Comprehensive; Plan, shows this ' area as potential multiple ..family,,residential :use:. The Planning..Commis - sion recommends to the City Council approval of the rezone: request • : - . : Benson Properties , . Appl. No: R-290-66, re qu est for,`-rezone :from_,R 3; toy R-4 :- property • :- located in`;the vicinity of the SE 'quadrant€` of Benson, Highway. _and. Puget _Drive ;and. north:'. of the ;'Fred. Nel•son .Junior. High School. = _ The proposed .R-4. -classification would. allow .:: ." ; ,: higher.: density than allowed under. R-3 and ', would permit _maximum-.height` of 6 stories,.=or,. : ' 95 ' .` The proposed use would not be detri mental to:. the adjacent properties. The `Com- - '. . . prehensive' indicates this::area.:as suitable, • foxi-.R-4 '•use. :The Planning :Commission• recom : _ m .approvalrezone. request.ended of .the . :('5) Walt':.Drag n, Appi. No. R-271-66 ,= rezone re quest from R-4 to L-1,- property located:. on :`': :the :SW 'corner of 6th-:Avenue. North and Will- . • = iaus: Street North. - .The _proposed. use would - be=. an;'extension of an existing automotive: ' . • service :station and: parkingr.ea. . The Ap- _area. plicant's'.:representative verbally amended . :• :. ,-.the.` rezone .request f-rom, L-1 to ':B-1.• The :. ': " - Comprehensive Plan indicates the proposed • APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE IN THE CITY OF RENTON FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No . : .Sec . - Twp . - R . • Date of Filing: j /9.- Area Map: Plan. .Comm. Action: Kroll Page: :Date: /ejC�.ir City Councils: Action: ✓ C NO , 1 () Date: Ord. No . APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY & ACCURATELY: Ralph R. and Virginia Richardson Richardson-1I.19 North 49th Ave. Name of Applicant �� ,r e Address Yana Wn,. ��—L. a� Maurer Ba�-vt 9 Telephone No .GL 361.10 Yakima, Wn. Barrett-1856 Monterey Drive BA 66296 Renton.. Wn. Benson Highway Renton, Wn. Property Petitions or rezoning is situatedg y on Street, between SE 166th Street and Benson Highway Street. Legal Description of Subject Property Lot 1 Block B Akers Farms No. 5 as per plat recorded in Volume 40 of Plats on page 27, records of King County; si tuatA .n the County of King,' State of Washington. • • • Existing. Zoning G 7200 Zoning Requested B-1 What are the uses you propose to develop on this property? Commercial Building Number of permanent off-street parking spaces that will be provided on this property? Number required NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to these sheets . 1 . In what way is this proposed change in zoning in.the public interest? me l prti,r Automotive Stations in this area, to properly take care of Publics ' Automotive needs. • 2. On what basis is there a real need in this community for more zoning of the type you request? The rnrnhlern of Wl,tmmntivp C�,�� -i_S ever increPRinr, in this area. 3. Do you consider the property involved in this application to be more suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone than for the uses permitted in the present classifica- tion? Please explain. Because of the strategic location of the property and to beautify community by very attractive construction. It is not an ideal 1,p U L i u 12 a 'tluau. 4. What provision would you make to protect adjacent and surrounding properties from the,detrimental effects of any uses permitted in the proposed zone ? Modern Autonoti VP, Stations today are so constructed they do not cause detrimental effects. RI,i l (11,lns blend into Ar.;a and doco7_•ai,ive laiidsc;aping anc` rencin'g are used. We want the construction to be an asset to the Cn amini ty_ . . . . . . • . ' ' , . . . . , ,. • , , ,i , . • ,,- . • ' A F 'F 1 .D A V I T Ralph. Richard2on, Virginia Richardson . I . . . . WE . Ra-..mond Barrebt, Maurine being duly sworn , declare that we are . / grxthe ownersof property involved in this application and that- . . . . the foregoing •statements and answers herein contained and the in- . . . ; . . . . . . formation herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct . . . . to the best of my knowledge and belief° - . ' , . . . ,. . . , . 1 1 . . I . , • . 1 • .1 . . Subscribed and sworn to me this ' . ' , H - " • , . , ' • . • . . . . . 19' day of jrimudyX , 196‘ , ' ' . ,H'' ' • . _ . '. , . . . • . , , . . . . . _ . • • . • . • . . . . . • Notary Public in and for the State . .• . . - • . . • . , . ,. . . . ,. • . , - . • . . - . . - of 'Washington, . . . . , . - .,.• : . ' . . . ...,'>,--7 • -,,,,\- , . . .- ,. . . , •,•...- .,..01.....,....(.....,„,„.._c____. 4-„--)•‘..,.....A,-,,,,CZY1-- , -./7' . -(:(- e-e..- ;;-- )',/, dZ(ra.tirif, • ___/./.,) . . , , la 0 r---gro:...,e-1-- ----- • ' TZWerre. :—eZ::Zwneyy-)- . . 771 • . - . /Y6 ;44'',/9' eu 6 b.c., 1,1-7: d'I' W .94 v Psrk.• i 470.1 4,.,y s. , re- . . -•o• . • • „•//e• Re,,,,xe„. . • . . • , . . .. . . , • . residing at ' . , . . ''- ,' • - . .: TITEITE-g Address) , . ' . . . „ . . • . . . _ . , • /0-6. -7/60--7- 6/92 , . . . • , . / . , • • . . . . . . . , • . , . , • . . . . • '''' --.. • Ct.,,,--.._. L._ . . . . • . (City) (State) . . . „ . . . . . . • . . . • . • . _ : . . . _ . . . , . . , . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . _ . . .. . . . . . , . . .. . . • "54 a - 6 • *-2-•• 9 , .. .. . T • elephor7 •• 6• . , T7 ------ . . . _ • . - • . See attached page for signatures (and notary for Ralph Richardson:, . . , . . . and Virginia Richardson, , . , . • . _ . lli7E.EM=IPs: . . . ... . . , . . . (OFFICE USE ONLY) . . ' . . ' . . • • . . CERTIFICATION . '.' ' •• - .. , ' . . . . • _ . . . • . . , . . . . • • . This is to certify that the foregoing:application has been . . ' • . . . . . inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete . ,. in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations . . / • . - ' of the Planning Department governing the filing of such applica- • • . : • . . , . . tion . . , . ' , . . ' • • - • . . • . . . . . . . . • , . . . . Date received 9 196 By . , . . . . — . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . 1 7z;,:,:,,m,.lm74tg4,;pM,7T,T,I,WNa7Tr:',"'' ':''P'T'AiFPWITTTI; iTMEI,UirW717gfqllli7WPPAT:g XO ;1 qEFFJT7' 70 -.- .1, i 'Hiii''''.i!'•'n'iiiO4.);i'F'';': .'4We'lfWi'irH41' " '''}Iln''''ll''' '''''1.;TI " .°*- 11''ll" I';*.1 :!.:,:•/*,-,,„,-..;444,,,*, , ,.,,,.. „;04,, ,A:::,....,..w,,, ,,,i,v,iiiiy,,,:!,, -1',14,:i.tw,'4,=.!,T411'1!,:4r44Iii,i1'61A441.i;mtrAel4PV-witi'l°1 '"'---w'''-'''''';''-'.-..f'j.' •.,,,,,,,;,,,,:,,,,-:,.,,,,,..„. .4.i.,.4”.,/,-).,±,../.,,.:,, 7.f-f.:er,,y. ..:::::=:,,, ,t,4,),,,r--..,nn,=:',11:46 -t.1;q44Ne'.'"*wqVtl".1.10=t.;'"6::FP'..',11,1"(1. ‘1°''''''''111rf''''"'"'''T'"Y''''''''' . ,.,,, ‘,,.,,,.„,,..,;.,,.,,:., ,..,,...-.•„,,,,,,,,44,,,,,.•:,..„,,•,,,„..... , ..::,:r„,/tq,. Ill - -'' '. ' ' .. „, . v,:•i, ,.._. _.,.-.,!....• ,-.7•tT.P• .;::.,'1'1',f'.=7:'!Ill!•' tr.t.a,''.i.4:1':; '''''%71 lit 1 I 1:!!.i,'!0!!1,1144;Ni liUt!lili'l; 1;111V: 1111'iiT,i'`.1,410!1! 0;!:41.,11 A",'i .jil'Iii.i10.ifi!i::11Igte'kl::th,:1!:'''''i' w�a . ', Subscribed and sworn to me this day. of January 1966, • ' Notary Public in"and .`. ' for the State of Washington. . • ' '`, \ . . �J . . ...._._............)(.......,,,t_._..c... I r' �,. / , t I.. _... ,;,„.,..,,.. ,.. „ Ralar.' & on (Owner) ,..,....,•. ..... ' , n , - - -'• C____4,-. ...;, ../ (!.. • .--17"--- •,-.. ,../. ./,/ , ' • ; . '. ' ' P., Virginia Richardson (owner) residing at 419 North 49th Avenue, Yakima, Wry. ' Telephone GI, 36410 Planning Commission , 2-23-66 Page 4 2 . REZONES :. CONTINUED: ( 4) RALPH RICHARDSON, APPLO NO0 R-287-66 , request for rezone from G-7200 to B-1 , property located .on Benson Highway at SE 166th Street and 108th Avenue SE. Committee report : Recommend approval subject to chahge6in the::. , Comprehensive Plan to reflect business use. Staff report : The proposed use is fora service station site. The Comprehensive. Plan indicates the use as suitable for multiple family 'esi'dential , but the location appears to beLa logical neighborhood business area. Slides of the area were shown. Discussion followed relative to the advisability of changing the Comprehensive Plan to allow the . proposed use. ACTION: Moved by Denzer, seconded by Teegarden that the hearing be closed. Motion carried. Moved . by Denzer, seconded by Cordell, to recommend to the City Council the rezone to B-1 contingent upon the change of the Comprehensive Plan map to reflect this use. Motion carried. • • ( 5) I . E . ST. CLAER, APPLO NO. R-289-66 , request for rezone from. R-1 to R-3 , property located on 10th Place North and Sunset Boulevard ,East. • Committee report : Recommend approval. The proposed rezone agrees with the Comprehensive Plano Staff report : The proposed R-3 use would be adjacent to an R-3 area. The -Comprehensive Plan shows the area as poten- tial multiple family use. Slides of the area in question were shown. After discussion on the proposed use, the following actions were taken: ACTION: Moved by Stredicke , seconded by Denzer, that the hearing closed. Motion carried. Moved by Stredicke, seconded by Cordell , that this re- zone be recommended to the City Council for approval , as the proposed rezone is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion carried. Mr. Racanello , abstained from voting on this matter. ( 6) BENS.ON PROPERTIES , APPL0 NO. R-290-66 , request for rezone from R-3 to R-4 , property located on Benson Highway south of Puget Drive. Committee report : Recommend approval, as thel proposed zone is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plano Staff report : The Comprehensive Plan indicates this area as suitable for multiple family residential use. The R-4 classification would allow a higher land density than-..the R-3 and would permit a maximum height. of 6 stories or 95 ' . The proposed R-4 use would not be detrimental to adjacent properties . • NOTICE . OF` _ PUBLIC. HEARING,: RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON,.. WASHINGTON. . . A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON WASHINGTON., ON Feb. 23 , 1966 AT 8 :00 P.M. TO CONSIDER A PETITION FOR Rezone FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: 4. From G-7200 to B-1, property in vicinity of Benson Highway and SE 166th Street : ; Lot 1, Blk. B, Akers Farms No. 5 ANY AND ALL PERSQNS INTERESTED QR OBJECTING TO SAID Rezone ARE INVITED TO BE. PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION '442rING ON _bet)* 2 19 AT 8: 00 P.M. TO . VOICE THEIR PROTEST OR OBJECTION TO SAME. PUBLISHED . q � a� JAMES DENZER ,SECRETARY RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , JAMES MAGSTADT , hereby certify that three (3) copies of the above document were posfed by me in three conspicuous places on the pro- perty described above as 'prescribed by law. ATTEST: Signed���4// DATE: 3i/p U' n 0O£a‘,V '' ,IiNkTON, RESIDING AT RENTON ... .. A --.40.. L Ari --.\\ 7-- --"-"- ------ - - - N..-tt\,\N:c----... -- ° „ OWNERS RkLPH t \RRGI kit A R.ic IAQoS0�1 Afl YAK lMA,WASt•-1. ' 2 AY1vtO MD MALI2.I LIE B 42R_E TT IZENTOW , WASK. \ LEGAL DE SC. 4) . \.\\\ .„ LOT 1 env_. 8 AKER'S FA .1\AS 1,..10. S \,a EXISTING BONING GB-7200 P .OQOSED ZON I4G 1 SCALE 1"-40' o ;J t5 March 14, 1966 Mr. Ralph R. Richardson P. C. Box 451. Yakima, Washington Dear Mr. Richardson: In reply to your letter of March 9, which we have received this date, we are forwarding herewith excerpts from the minutes of the Renton City Council meeting of March 7, 1966. You state you were present when the City Council.metFon March 2nd, however, the City Council meets only on Monday nights and the Planning Commission meetings are held on Wednesday, In any event, the Planning Commission recommenda- tion submitted to the Council on March 7th recommended approval of your request, however, as you can see, from the minutes, the City Attorney advised that the Planning Commission has no jurisdiction to proceed with rezones if they do not agree with the Comprehensive Plan and Maps,and unless the Plan, and Maps are changed to agree, no rezone may be considered. We hope that this may somewhat clarify the action of the Council on the matter. As you will note, all other rezones not in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan were likewise referred back to the Planning Commission. If you have further inquiries/you may contact Planning Director Gordon Erickson and he will advise of action to be taken henceforth. If there is any further questions which may be answered by our office do not hesitate to make your request. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Helmie W. Nelson, City Clerk HWN/dm 4 , 8 .R P. 0. Box 451 Yakima, Washington March 9, 1966 Helmie W. Nelson City Clerk Renton, Washington Dear Mr. Nelson: I received a letter from you today dated March 9, 1966 which read as follows: "The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of March 7, 1966 has re- ferred your rezone request back to the Planning Commission inasmuch as the proposed zoning is not in accord with the City's Comprehensive Plan and maps." Will you please e la' the meaning of this letter. I was present with Mr. Raymond Barrett when th ,ity Co c I met for their meeting on March 2, 1966 at which time the council v d and approved our request for rezoning. The only discussion was the matter.-pertaining to rezone to permit a service station which was going to be decidter. However, at this meeting they did approve the request to change the zoning from R to commercial property with some restrictions. ccording to my understanding the documents had been presented to the Planning Commission and they had approved it. It then went to the Council meeting at which time I was present and it was voted upon and approved. If my mmderstanding is not correct, please clearify the points which I have made above. Thank you for your prompt attention. Sincerely, 1/2-1"---"A-1/-417 C-4-1,7,---4,L..--2_,_,.,7_1, r c.,./,-,e,-,,,e(2 1 :1:1,..z4,-.. .___, A,-- , Ralph R. Richardson