HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-186 BEGINNING
OF FILE
FILE TITI
1 a Is , 71
ICR [ FILMED
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE
HEARING EXAMINER
` RENTON,WASHINGTON
OC REN?. A PUBLIC HEARING
1 WILL BE HELD BY THE
�C \1F1 RENTON LAND USE
� HEARING EXAMINER AT
Affidavit of Publ ti n IN f?EGLILAR MEETING
26 ).-; IN THE COUNCIL CHAM-
JUL BERS, CITY HALL, RE-
- RE-
NTON,WASHINGTON,ON
STATE OF WASHLNGTO l l JULY is, 1978. AT 9:00
COUNTY OF KING ( ss. \A5, /'����I �� A.M. TO CONSIDER THE
FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
9N Q./ 1. RUSSELL EAGER,
Q Files, 186-78 and E-
1 ., 1 7 •�,� LNG�� 187-78, APPLICA-
beingfirstdulyswornon TION FOR 4-LOT
SHORT PLAT AP-
PROVAL AND APPLI-
oath,deposes and says that pis the �'� ¢ "1 E r k of CATION FOR EX
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) CEPTION TO THE
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and SUBDIVISION ANCERE ROEGARD-
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred NANCE REGARD
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- I N PI P E S T E M
paper published four (4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, LOTT S; property to
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained cated at Powell Ave.
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton S. between S.W.
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Langston Road and
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, S.W. 3rd Place.
2. R. L.UNDSDERFER,
r'llblic '! rj,r1r- BITNEY REALTY,
Washington.That the annexed is a Files 190-78 and E- •
1 91-78, APPLICA-
TION FOR 3-LOT
SHORT PLAT AP-
PROVAL AND APPLI-
CATION FOR EX-
as it was published in regular issues(and CEPTION TO THE
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period SUBDIVISION ORDI-
NANCE REGARD-
ING LOT FRON-
of 1 consecutive issues,commencing on the TAGE; property to
cated on Cedar Av-
enue South between
day of ,19 ,and ending the South 4th Street and
South 6th Street.
•r J;i`'r 3.J & F INVESTMENT
78 COMPANY (FERN-
dayof ,19 both dates WOOD), Files PP-
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- 192-78 AND E-205-
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 78, APPLICATION
1 FOR PRELIMINARY
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ which PLAT APPROVAL OF
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the 74-LOT SINGLE
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent FAMILY RESIDENCE
insertion.
a_...,, E . (x) ce,j, SUBDIVISION AND
APPLICATION FOR
EXCEPTION TO THE
SUBDIVISION ORDI-
NANCE{� , ..� _�y(,� REGARD-
' ING PIPESTEM
LOTS; property lo-
p Gated at Union Av-
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of enue S.E. and S.E.
Second Place, north
197 of the Heather Downs
/3
I Subdivision.
Legal descriptions of all
applications noted above on
Notary Public ' and for the State of Washi on I file in the Renton Planning
,
residing at Kent, King nty. Department.
ALL INTERESTED PER-
SONS TO SAID PETITIONS
r ARE INVITED TO BE PRE-
- Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June SENT AT THE PUBLIC
9th, 1955.
HEARING ON JULY 1 B.
f 1978, AT 9:00 A.M. TO
— Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, ,I EXPRESS THEIR OPI-
adopted by the newspapers of the State. NIONS.
GORDON Y. ERICKSEN
RENTON PLANNING
DIRECTOR
i Published in The Renton
1 Pt-word-Chronicle July 7.
Renton City Council
8/21/78 Page 2
Public Hearing - Cont.
Vacation Portion in conjunction with duplex zoning, adding that city has never
of NE 14th incurred any expense in re to street as it has been left vacant
and unkept. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE TO CLOSE THE
PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. *MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE
THAT VACATION AS PROPOSED BE DENIED. Substitute Motion by
Clymer, Second Perry to delay action on vacation until Mr. Bennett's
final plat is filed. Roll Call : Aye - Clymer, Perry, Shinpoch;
No - Thorpe, Stredicke, Shane, Trimm. 3 Aye' s, 4 No' s. Motion
failed. Councilman Clymer noted loss of filing fee by the petitioner
for the street vacation. AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND
STREDICKE THAT $100 FILING FEE BE REFUNDED TO THE APPLICANT. CARRIED.
*ORIGINAL MOTION CARRIED TO DENY STREET VACATION.
AUDIENCE COMMENT
Vacation Portion . Mike Hanis, 759 Dayton NE, explained his original request for vacation
NE 14th of NE 14th and requested that portion be approved.
Introduction Councilman Stredicke introduced Tom Larson, Scout, working on
communication merit badge to become an Eagle Scout.
OLD BUSINESS
Eager Short Pla MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE TO SUSPEND RULES AND HEAR AT THIS
TIME THE HEARING EXAMINER, DECISION, APPEAL, AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT RE EAGER SHORT PLAT. CARRIED.
Subject before the council : Hearing Examiner' s decision of
July 21, 1978 re Russell Eager application for short plat 186-78
located approximately 150 ft. south of the southeast corner of
Powell Ave. SW and SW LangstonRoad. Applicant requested approval
of a proposed 4-lot short plat and an exception to the Subdivision
Ordinance to allow two 20 ft. pipestems to provide access to
separate rear lots. Hearing Examiner decision: approval of short
plat with 50 ft. right-of-way. Appeal filed by Don E. Weitkamp,PH.D.
of Moore and Moore Realty. The Hearing Examiner's decision, findings
and conclusions, and appeal were reviewed by the Planning and
Development Committee and a recommendation prepared. Planning
and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented report recommending
the Council concur in the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner.
MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION.
CARRIED.
Renton Hill Councilman Clymer left the Council Chambers due to conflict of
Rezone interest. Councilman Perry, Chairman Planning and Development
Committee requested letter from Mr. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner,
be read re Renton Hill Rezone, questioning intent of Committee's
recommendation and Council ' s action re PUD in the Renton Hill Rezone
at August 14, 1978 Council meeting. Councilman Perry requested
discussion by council re future and present considerations for a
PUD in the area rezoned. Councilman Shane noted intent was R-1,
single-family residental . Councilwoman Thorpe noted PUD can mean
single-family development, does not necessarily mean other than
single-family development; the ordinance stipulates it has to be
compatible and allows for city and community involvement in the
decision. Asst. City Attorney, Dan Kellogg, noted that council
action does not imply that a PUD is an inappropriate means of
'development, just not required. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE
THAT THE MATTER BE CLARIFIED TO THE HEARING EXAMINER IN A LETTER
FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. Councilman Clymer returned to
Council Chambers.
Appointment Ways and Means Committee report was read recommending council
Part-Time concurrence in the Mayor's appointment of Mr. Louie Gebenini as
Airport part-time Airport Director. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY TO
Director CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke
noted for the record his objection that position was not advertised.
Ammi
111.
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
August 21, 1978 Council Chambers
Monday, 8: 00 P . M. Municipal Building
MINUTES
CALL TO ORDER Mayor C.J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order.
ROLL CALL OF EARL CLYMER, Council President, GEORGE Y. PERRY, PATRICIA M.
COUNCIL SEYMOUR-THORPE, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, CHARLES F.
SHANE, THOMAS W. .TRIMM.
CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. 'DELAURENTI, Mayor; DAN KELLOGG, Asst. City Attorney;
IN ATTENDANCE GWEN MARSHALL, Finance Director; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk;
WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning
Director; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks Director; RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief;
HUGH DARBY, Police Chief.
PRESS GREG ANDERSON, Renton Record Chronicle
MINUTE APPROVAL Councilman Perry requested addition of the entire Planning and
Development Committee report be attached to August 14, 1978 Minutes
re Renton Hill Rezone-Page 2. Also recess listed on page 2 should
not include Councilman Clymer as being present due to conflict of
interest re subject matter, returning after recess 10:05, page 3.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY THAT COMPLETE COMMITTEE• •REPORT
BE ATTACHED AS A PERMANENT RECORD OF AUGUST 14, 1978 MINUTES. CARRIED.
MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 14, 1978
AS AMENDED. CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING
Vacation Portion This being the date set and proper notices having been posted,
of NE 14th published, and mailed, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing
to consider closure of a portion of 14th Ave. NE, petitioned by
(West of Hazel W. Chenaur, Mr. George Rusk, and Mr. Del Bennett. Letter
Edmonds Ave. read from Mr. Warren Gonnason, Chairman Board of Public Works,
NE) stating present and future city street circulation does not require
this portion of NE 14th St. ; a utility easement over the northerly
60 ft. is required; recommended vacation of the entire portion of
NE 14th; vacation subject to sufficient ingress and egress for fire
and emergency vehicles; and value of the property should be set at
$.50 per sq. ft. Councilman Stredicke inquired re approval of
proposed plat and planning for fire access. Mr. Warren Gonnason
noted plat has been approved and fire access was consideration of
Hearing Examiner; who concluded no need for NE 14th. Councilman
Clymer inquired if Hazel Chenaur would be landlocked. Mr. Gonnason
noted technically she would not be landlocked, because of the request
to not include 30 ft. strip. Councilman Shane inquired proposed
development in that area and width of easement to be reserved.
Mr. Gonnason noted area probably would be developed with access to
NE 16th and recommendation of a 60 ft. wide easement. Mr. Mike Hanis,
759 Dayton NE, Attorney for applicant Chenaur, asked council not to
concur in recommendation to vacate whole north 60 ft. Mr. George Rusk,
1401 Edmonds Ave. NE, opposed amount of assessment and problem with
blackberry patch and parking in that area. Mr. Gonnason modified
recommendation so as not to leave Chenaur property landlocked.
Councilwoman Thorpe inquired as to plat approval and how amount of
assessment was figured. Mr. Gonnason explained preliminary plat
approval and county assessor's appraised value. Councilman Stredicke
inquired about zoning in that area. Gordon Ericksen, Planning Dept. ,
noted various single and multi-family zoning. Councilwoman Shinpoch
inquired as to leaving upper 30 ft. open to Mr.' Rusk's property.
Mr. Gonnason explained alternatives and that other property owners
could purchase that' property. . Councilwoman Thorpe inquired about
intended use of the property vacated. Mr. Hanis noted construction
411111
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
Date: August 21 , 1978
TO : Council Members
FROM : Planning and Development Committee •
RE : APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
RUSSELL EAGER SHORT PLAT , 186-78
RUSSELL EAGER EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE , E-187-78
The Planning and Development Committee , after examination
of the record and the Hearing Examiner ' s written decision ,
findings , and conclusions pursuant to Section 4-3017 ,
recommends that the City Council concur in the recommenda-
tion of the Hearing Examiner .
George Perry, C airman
ii —
cilw Sow
Barbara Shinpoch , Member
&raL J
,
Patricia S ymour-Thorpe
MOORE & MOORE REALTY, LTD.
1 1 5 BURNETT AVE. SO.
RENTON, WA. 9B055 2,35 6 g�
226-5777 '� /� 7p
.
August 4, 1978 ., A03,
m.
�S �1T1RK� OEEOE �
City of Renton
Re: Eagar Short Plat, File No. Short Plat 186-78, E-187-78.
I am hereby filing an appeal on the Short Plat known as Eagar Short
Plat and the requirement imposed by the Hearing Examiner for the 50'
right of way to serve 3 lots.
The requirement for 50' is contrary to the staff report prepared by
the Planning Department., which would require 25' with 14' of paving.
The 14' of paving and 25' right of way is consistent with former
requirements made by the City Council such as Ross Short Plat and
Colman Short Plat in N.E. Renton.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Don E. Weitkamp, PH. D.
DEW:b
1
•
THE CITY OF RENTON
}s ... MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD
AD CITY CLERK
9�TtD SEP1���
August 4, 1978
APPEAL FILED BY: DonE. Weitkamp, PH.D.
Moore & Moore Realty,. Ltd.
RE: Appeal of Land Use. Examiner's Decision dated July 21, 1978,
Eagar Short Plat, File No. Short Plat 186-78, E-187-.78
To Parties of Record:
Appeal of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with
the City Clerk's Office on August 4, 1978, along with the proper fee of
$25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code, as amended. The City Code
requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. ,
The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed
by the Council 's Planning & Development'.Committee. . Please contact the
Council Secretary, 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meeting
is so desired.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered
by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of August 21, 1978 at
8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill
Ave. South, Renton.
Yours very truly,
CITY OF RENTON
4detted)
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk .
DAM/st
cc: Parties of Record
j L
_J . CITY. OF REN' :4 N . No: 5953;� `
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ,
„...,,.7• ,: . , e_-.) .ri
RENTON,. WASINGTON, 98055 • 19 7
't ' ' H RECEIVED OF Y-�,�,,,}I Q,.. A e�-fr''�.-`.-. s. r, r _ _
.
TOTAL 7)0
GWEN .E. MARSHALL,, FIIWICE DIRECTOR
MOORE & MOORE REALTY, LTD.
1 1 5 BURNETT AVE. SO.'
RENTON, WA. 98055 23Q
226-5777 \ n
August 4, 1978 p�r'19�8 '-\
..rvv°� R OFfoE(
City of Renton Feezteozcl
Re: Eagar Short Plat, File No. Short Plat 186-78, :E-187-78.
I am hereby filing an appeal on the Short Plat known as Eagar Short
Plat and the requirement imposed by the Hearing Examiner for the 50'
right of way to serve 3 .lots.
The requirement for 50' is contrary to the staff report prepared by
the Planning Department, which would require 25'' .with 14' of paving.
The 14' of paving and 25' right of way is consistent with former
requirements made by the City Council such as Ross Short Plat and
Colman Short Plat in N.E. Renton.
Thank you for your consideration of this. request.
Sincerely,
Don. E. Weitkamp, PH.. D.
DEW:b
VIP
Ir
0V
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
Ap �Q L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593
,P4),
4itb SEP1 �O
August 7, 1978
Members, Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
RE: File No. Short Plat 186-78, E-187-78; Russell Eager.
Dear Council Members:
An appeal was received on the referenced application on August 4,
1978 within the appeal period established by ordinance. Attached
is the letter of appeal as well as the Examiner's Report, dated
July 21, 1978.
According to guidelines of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, this
matter should appear on the Council agenda on August 21, 1978,
following a 28-day period after publication of the report.
If you require additional information or assistance regarding
this matter, please contact the undersigned.
Since
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
MOC`= -= E MOORS REAL ,
1 15 BURNETT^AVE. SO..
RENTON, WA. .98055 3A:56
226-5777. \ 4
• August 4, 1978 - v�9
RICE
WO
\t/,,C5Lt° S\'•
City of Renton
Re: Eagar Short Plat, File No. Short Plat 186-78, E-187-78.
I am hereby filing an appeal on'the Short 'Plat. known as Eagar Short
Plat and the requirement imposed by the Hearing Examiner for the 50'
right of way to serve 3:'lots.
The requirement for 50' is contrary to the. staff report prepared by
the Planning Department, which would require 25' with 14' of paving.
The 14' of paving an.d 25' right of way is consistent with former
requirements made by the City Council .such as Ross Short Plat and
Colman Short Plat in N.E. Renton.
Thank you for your consideration of this. request.
•
Sincerely, ` .
f )2. L /
Don E.' Weitkamp, PH. D.
DEW:b
imio
ov
;� a THE CITY OF RENTON
CIO MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o
0
-1) CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR. • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
4) ��. L. RICK BEELER.. 235-2593
•
4Tcb SEP1- •
August 7, 1978
Members, Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
RE: File No. Short Plat 186-78, E-187-78; Russell Eager.
Dear Council Members:
An appeal was received on the referenced application on August 4,
1978 within the appeal period established by ordinance. Attached
is the letter of appeal as well as the Examiner's Report, dated
July 21, 1978.
According to guidelines of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance, this
matter should appear on the Council agenda on August 21, 1978,
following a 28-day period after publication of the report.
If you require additional information or assistance regarding
this matter, please contact the undersigned.
Sinceze
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department •
City Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING. •
State of Washington)
County of King
•
Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 21st day of July , 19 78 , af.f iant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a .decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
•
Subscribed and sworn this ;"`kday of �v\�{
19 -0) vl
. I
• A A '-\\(.\
C
Notary Public in and for the *State
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition or Case: Sh. P1. 186-78, E-187-78; Russell Eager.
(The mi.nu-teA contain a t i es t 66 the pan.ti.ee a6 /meand)
H �� s
July 21, 1978
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ,
APPLICANT: Russell Eager FILE NO. Short Plat 186-78
E-187-78
LOCATION: Approximately 150 feet south of the southeast corner of Powell
Avenue S.W. and S.W. Langston Road.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a proposed 4-lot short plat and
an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow two (2)
20-foot pipestems to provide access to separate rear lots.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval of short plat
with dedicated half-street.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of short plat with
50-foot right-of-way.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on July 11, 1978.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and
field checking the property and surrounding area, the
' Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
The hearing was opened on July 18, 1978 at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following
additional exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: Revised Short Plat Map
Exhibit #3: •Short Plat Map as submitted.
Mr. Smith indicated that the short plat map had been revised to eliminate the requirement
for two pipestems and provide access via a half-street on the southern boundary of the
property. He noted that the width of the half-street designated on Exhibit #2 had been
revised from 20 tO 25 feet to provide access alternatives for future land use and
subdivisions in the area, and although sidewalks would not be required, paving, curbs,
gutters, and drainage control would be appropriate requirements for the request. Mr.
Smith advised that departmental comments attached to Exhibit #1 pertained to Exhibit #3,
short plat map as originally submitted by the applicant.
the Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1.
Responding was:
John Norman
Norman Associates, Inc.
Evergreen Building, Suite 509
Renton, WA 98055 •
Mr. Norman indicated certain objections to the report. He referenced departmental comments
from the Engineering and Utilities Division which responded to configurations denoted on
Exhibit #3, noting that revisions contained in Exhibit #2 would require improvement and
requirements relating to the proposed half-street on the southern boundary of the property,
including paving, curb and necessary sewer and water on the half-street. He also
objected to requirements for installation of a large detention facility on the four-lot
parcel as being unreasonable.
The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no
response. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for clarification that the site contained
sufficient acreage for the applicant to provide a 50-foot dedicated street. Mr. Smith
advised that the size of the site was adequate for provision of the street, but lot size
Short Plat its6-78 Page Two
E-187-78
would be substantially impacted. The Examiner inquired if the L-shape configuration at
the end of the half-street would require an exception from the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr.
Smith felt that the configuration would be considered as part of the design of the half-
street and, therefore, would not require an exception. The Examiner inquired if
improvement of the half-street would be a design consideration upon completion of the
entire street dependent upon development to the east and south of the subject site, and
if the proposed configuration met design requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr.
Smith indicated that for future development purposes a full hammerhead configuration
consisting of 40 by 80-foot turning radius was possible, but the applicant proposed to
pave the end of the hammerhead to provide a 20 by 40-foot turnaround which he felt met
the intent of the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance.
The Examiner noted Mr. Norman's objection to provision of storm drainage facilities as
recommended by staff and inquired regarding proposed alternatives. Mr. Norman indicated
his concurrence in joining the existing storm drainage facilities in the area, but
proposed that in lieu of a large detention facility, a small weir be constructed to
control storm water run-off on the property. He estimated costs of construction of a
detention facility which he felt were unreasonable for a four-lot plat.
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for revisions or modifications to Exhibit #1. Mr. Smith
indicated that Exhibit #1 would remain as submitted, and noted that revisions regarding.
design and storm drainage proposed by Mr. Norman could be reviewed with the Engineering
Division.
The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No.
Short Plat 186-78 and E-187-78 was closed by the Examiner at 9:30 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter,
the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is for approval of a short plat of four single family lots and an exception
to allow two pipestem lots. A revised short plat (Exhibit #2) eliminated the pipestem
lots.
2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies
and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter,
and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as
set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible
official, ,determined that the proposal is exempt from the threshold determination
and EIS requirements of SEPA.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
7. The proposal is compatible with the setbacks, lot coverage and lot area requirements
of Section 4-706 (R-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances.
Parcel No. 1, the corner lot, is platted larger than the other lots per Section
9-1108.23.F. (4) .
8. Sufficient area exists within the subject site to accommodate a dedicated public '
right-of-way of 50 feet and still permit four single family lots. Per Section
9-1108.23.F. (2) , all of the lots must front on a ". . .public street or road with a
width of not less than. . . " 50 feet.
The proposal, as revised per Exhibit #2, features a 20-foot half-street and 20-foot
by 40-foot L-shaped turn-around. Per Section 9-1108.23.A. (5) a street right-of-way
should be 50 feet. Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) provides for hammerhead turn-arounds. of
40 feet by 80 feet. Section 9-1108.23.A. (8) provides for temporary turn-arounds of
a diameter of 80 feet pending extension of the street or completion. ". . .beyond the
boundary of the original subdivision." Private streets are expressly prohibited
under Section 9-1108.23.A. (9) .
Short Plat 186-78 Page Three
E-187-78
9. •Opposition was expressed by the applicant of the requirement to provide on-site
storm water retention system. Section IX.C, Ordinance No. 3174 (Renton Storm and
Surface Water Drainage Ordinance) , requires retention/detention facilities for
handling ". . .surface water in excess of the peak discharge. . .". The proposal does
not fall within the exceptions of Section V. (A) of Ordinance No. 3174. Specific
storm drainage control plans were not submitted into the record.
10. The applicant disagreed with the Public Works Department requirement that the existing
substandard water main in Powell Avenue S.W. be replaced along the property (Exhibit
#1, Staff Report) . It was contended that the utilities that are required should only
be in the proposed half-street.
11. Restrictive covenants were not submitted (Section 9-1105.3.B) .
12. An affidavit was 'contained in the file of record attesting to the ownership of the
subject property (Section 9-1106.3.H. (1) .
13. The proposed half-street has not been dedicated for public use (Section 9-1106.3.H. (2) .
14. A survey of the property has been made by a licensed land surveyor (Section
9-1106. 3.H. (3) .
15. Certification from the King County Health and Finance Departments and from the City
of Renton Finance Department will occur just prior to, during, or immediately
following filing of the plat with King County (Section 9-1106.3.H. (4) , (7) , & (8) .
16. Improvements have not been installed and a deferment or waiver have not been requested
(Section 9-1106.3.H. (5) .
17. A title insurance policy has not been provided (Section 9-1106.3.H. (6) .
18. Bills of sale for utilities have not been provided (Section 9-1106.3.H. (9) .
19. Off-site improvements are required on Powell Avenue S.W.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and the general character of the
neighborhood.
2. Unless an exception application is filed and the criteria of Section 9-1109 found to
be applicable, the Examiner lacks authority to approve half-streets under the
Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 11. Section 9-1108.23.F. (2) requires that each lot
in the plat front on a public street or road, which per Section 9-1108.23.A. (5) must
be 50 feet in width. The referenced short plat application, File No. 088-77 (Ross) ,
contained the same conclusions, which were upheld by the City Council upon appeal,
and additional right-of-way was acquired to form a public street.
The same conclusion is true for the proposed turnaround which does not meet the
criteria of Sections 9-1108.23.A. (7) and (8) . An exception application is required.
3. The Public Works Department is required by Ordinance No. 3174 to review and approve
the storm drainage plan for the proposal. This can be accomplished prior to final
approval fo the plat per Section 9-1105.7.
4. The issue of replacing the water line in Powell Avenue S.W. can be resolved with the
Public Works Department. Perhaps an LID for upgrading the water line should be
instituted along the street. Testimony provided the Examiner with no specific
information with which to draw a more specific conclusion.
5. Completion of the certification requirements of Section 9-1106.3.H. must occur prior
to final approval by staff of the plat.
6. Although the applicant was following guidance by staff in revising the application
(Exhibit #2) , the Examiner is prevented from approving the short plat without provision
of acceptable access to the short plat. Either access and turn-arounds are provided
per the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance (dedicated 50-foot public right-of-
way) or exception applications are filed for deviation from these requirements.
Short Plat i86-78 Page Four
E-187-78
DECISION:
Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's decision
to approve the short plat subject to:
1. Providing access via a 50-foot dedicated public right-of-way and required turn-around
or granting of exceptions thereto by the Examiner.
2. Approval by the Public Works Department of the storm drainage plan.
3. Resolution by the Public Works Department of replacing the existing water line in
Powell Avenue S.W. An LID should be investigated to accomplish the purpose of
upgrading the water line.
4. Completion of certification per Section 9-1106. 3.H.
ORDERED THIS 21st day of July, 1978.
eeler
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of July, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of
record:
Russell Eager, 253 Thomas Avenue S.W. , Renton, WA 98055
John Norman, Norman Associates, Inc. , Evergreen Building,
Suite 509, Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of July, 1978 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
•
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before August 4, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within
fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set
forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after
review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and
meeting other specified requirements. Copies of .this ordinance are available for
inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be
purchased at cost in said office.
RECEIVED
° PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4111110 CITY OF REIVT06V
HEAR)NG EXAMINER
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER ,3-0L1 81978
AM PM
PUBLIC HEARING 718,9,10,11,12,1,213,4,5,6
July 18 , 1978
APPLICANT : RUSSELL EAGER
ITEM NO. . tf /r4. i77-78`
FILE NO : SHORT PLAT-186-78 , SHORT PLAT APPROVAL
E-187-78 , EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
The applicant requests the approval of a proposed 4-lot short
plat and an exception to the subdivision ordinance to allow
two (2 ) 20-foot pipestems to provide access to separate rear
lots .
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
1 . Owner of Record : Russell and Charlotte Eager
2 . Applicant : Russell Eager
3 . Location : Approximately 150 feet south
of the southeast corner of Powell
Avenue S . W . and S . W . Langston Road .
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is
available on file in the Renton
Planning Department .
5 . Size of Property: ±1 . 16 acres
6. Access : Via Powell Avenue S .W .
7 . Existing Zoning : R-1 , General Classification District ,
Single Family Residential , minimum
lot size 7200 square feet .
8 . Existing Zoning in Area : R-1 , G-6000, Single Family Residence
District ; P-1 , Public Use District
9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential
10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing
of the hearing date . Notice was
properly published in the Record
Chronicle and posted in three places
on or, near the site as required by
City Ordinance.
C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST :
To permit subdivision of the subject site into 4 single family
residence lots for future development of single family residences .
In order to allow such subdivision , the applicant is also
requesting an exception to the subdivision ordinance .
D . HISTORY/BACKGROUND :
The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No . 1320
dated July 8 , 1948 . It was then and is presently a part of
Earlington Addition, Block 4 , recorded on July 19, 1906 .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : RUSSELL EAGER , FILE NO . 186-78 , E-187-78
JULY 18 , 1978
PAGE TWO
E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND :
1 . Topography : The site is generally level .
2 . Soils : Beausite gravelly sandy loam ( BeC ) , runoff is medium
and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for
timber and pasture and for urban development .
3 . Vegetation : Ground cover consists of short thick grass .
Shrubs are medium to tall in height and scattered throughout
the property. There are a few deciduous trees on site near
the east and southeast property lines .
4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation of the site provides
suitable habitat for birds and small mammals .
5. Water : There is no surface water evident on the site .
6. Land Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped .
F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The area is primarily single family residential in nature.
G. PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer : A 2-inch water main extends in a north-
south direction on Powell Avenue along with an 8-inch main .
An 8-inch main runs along S . W. Langston and a 6-inch main
on S . W. 3rd Place . 6-inch sanitary sewers exist on S .W .
' Langston and south on Powell for approximately one-half
the block between Langston and 3rd Place while an 8-inch
sewer extends to 3rd Place from that point and another
8-inch sewer exists on S . W. 3rd Place .
2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department
as per ordinance requirements .
3 . Transit : METRO Transit route 142 operates along Renton
Avenue South within 1/4 mile to the north of the subject
site and route 107 runs along Stevens Avenue N .W . approxi -
mately the same distance away.
4. Schools : The Earlington Elementary School is located
approximately 1/4 mile northwest of the subject site and
Fred Nelson Junior High School is approximately 2 miles
to the southeast with Renton Senior High School 3/4 mile
east. '
5. Parks : Skyway Park -is situated 3/4 mile to the northwest
and Jones Park approximately 1 1/4 miles to the northeast.
H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
Section 4-706, R-1 , Residence Single Family
, I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR
OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS :
1 . Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1105 ; Short Subdivisions
2 . Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1109; Exceptions
3 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , p . 18
/ •
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : RUSSELL EAGER , FILE NO . 186-78 , E-187-78
JULY 18 , 1978
PAGE THREE
J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS :
Minor
K. SOCIAL IMPACTS :
Minor
L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C ,
the subject proposal is exempt from the threshold determination
and EIS requirements of SEPA.
M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION :
A vicinity map and a site map are attached .
N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1 . City of Renton Building Division .
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division .
3 . City of Renton Traffic. Engineering Division .
4. City of Renton Utilities Division .
5. City of Renton Fire Department .
•
0. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
1 . The proposed single family residence lots are consistent .
with the comprehensive plan land use element , the existing
uses inLthe area , and the existing R-1 , residence single
family zoning of the site and surrounding area .
2 . The proposed lots exceed minimum ordinance requirements for
size (minimum 7200 square feet ) and dimensions (lot #1 := 8400
square feet ; lot #2 = 16 ,800 square feet; lot #3 = 8400 square
feet ; lot #4 = 16 ,800 square feet) .
3 . There is insufficient lot width ( 180 feet ) to provide for a
full 50-foot right-of-way through the center of the property
with platted lots on either side. The only other alternative
to the pipestem configuration proposed is to provide a 50-
foot right-of-way or possibly a half-street along either the
north or south property line with the possibility for future
extension to Thomas Avenue S . W . This would also result in
a 4-lot configuration . An existing adjacent residence
appears to be located approximately 5 feet north of the
north property line thereby creating some problems for
location of a street along the north boundary. A half.-
street along the south boundary appears to be feasible for
the subject site , and would allow for development of adjacent
property to the south. This configuration would also be
similar to other approved subdivisions in the vicinity
( i . e. , Ross Short Plat No . 088-77 ) . Although the location
of existing residences appears to block its ultimate exten-
sion to Thomas Avenue South , such a street could extend to
the east boundary of the subject site with an L-shaped turn-
around . As other properties are platted and developed ,
additional right-of-way will be required to complete the
roadway and turnaround . Such a configuration would result
in four more compatible lots averaging approximately 9000
square feet each . Such an access proposal will be more
compatible with future planning and uses in the area .
4111,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : RUSSELL EAGER , FILE NO . 186-78 , E-187-78
JULY 18 , 1978
PAGE FOUR
4. Suitable utilities are available to the subject site .
However , certain upgrading of the water main is necessary.
(See Utilities Division comments . )
5. Off-site improvements (curb, gutter , sidewalk , and storm
drainage ) are required on Powell Avenue S . W.
6. Storm drainage retention and calculations and ' plans are
required by the Public Works Department. The applicant
must coordinate such design with the Public Works Department.
P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION :
Recommend approval of a revised 4-lot short plat with dedicated
half-street and suitable turnaround facilities along the south
property line similar to that shown by the attached exhibit
map. Such short plat approval shall be further subject to the
requirements of the Public Works Department and other ordinance
requirements with regard to off-site improvements , drainage
plans , and utilities .
/ \ .
.
�
lop DOM
AN
IS Ila
W N7
b.
MOM
150
3 Viva &.11 Iwo
4-0
PF
A IN
7V
mg ly
09
Zvi
CON I:I I fe 00
-R, -
gig
z 41111
41, K *to-4,1
el A h 461b,
Al
--------------
�
SHORT PLAT - EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE :
l �
�
�
.
APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT APPROVAL FOR 4-LOT SUBDIVISION AND �
} }
EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE , Files NO . 186-78 and
E - iO7-78 � �rO�8rt� located along east side Of PON�ll Ave . S . bRt#28D �- - �
3 W | ano�ton Road an� S W 3rd Plarp
' ' ' ~ ' /
' r �
�
l6 acres
' APPLICANT Ru5Sell Eager TOTAL AREA 1 . 16
' PRINCIPAL ACCESS Southwest 3rd Place and Powell Avenue Southwest
� E�l5llN� ZONING R-1 ( Single 'Family R85fd8DCR)
. .
/
USE Undeveloped
) EXISTING /
i
R-1 '
PROPOSED USE /
i
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE
PLAN R-1
COMMENTS
-
. .
'
I '
4 lb
•
`13 \ric-3, 0 cr.-.3Q0
a . , _- -- --A.-=::
_ _ -_-_,_,,______,...,_____ _ ,
__
J, _ ' - •
-- - ii. 0 ‘
�� - J - - - ` G. LAN65 s ROM Rh
lit 1
�I 1 ICI El cos [7-' I 1
11.1
I 1 L ,
a P
I; , I 1-
D tto• 1, a ,t
a.
a�.�
rr nnagen �
R•
Via
III �O
r
— -- r__.\
II
0
I
J ,
i
� K
�1 �7 11 1 I I i — 1
lita
14 6 il 1 1
' \ ,
it a. I :::® I II 1' W
[] iv
ti n . cL S.W 3Rp ? �L.
• fir,
_G:1 0 1. 1 0 El rirt. I NI ,___ 9 , [—:
'',/:' . I rii 1 il 1 LT--3 P
I; „ 0-—ri_
V// I , , II
I1 1 I ; 4 ( ,
k i
i
--- .W• .NTH P
UNsE.
............%-s."'".-.L"..`-----••••=.11-.___,..,..___,-;?) .. '.'in"n "..."-.1..........=..... -' 7..--•V.!) • .
/, Sc LC I' 200°
ca ''r , }5g83Ea St7
r
• (t.15S&Lt. EncieR
SH°Rz 1...A7 E_ 6-r8 •
, - . . ... . .. . .
. .
1 ‘ , ,
,',,,......i ,-...„ viite,
,,,-
- - , 5,...
',I
ID
4- ''' ii "," ' ..
. ..
LAT
.• ••
BLOCK 4 EARLINGTON ADDITION Ei/2 513 T23N R4E W.M. 4 X 4 F1
121.7
CONC M0
LANCSTON ROAD - 13 18
4“ X 4" F D Li
CONC MON. '
t
• . - _ _ ,
. t. -.,•';-' .1.- , .,-L:o
-- to
,, •,- . I - r••• z I N
_...i.‘1 4" X 4 F-" 1
•
CONC MO
. .
,•-•• --.‘11-
_ • ,N.7 4'X 4" F
141.9 CCNC Mr
• • al"
6.-
' 30 ' 30' • •
1 .
.
,,,....,
i ,.."..:..
-,:•,... •
., •
. • ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . . . _ - -
• N 71' 2.9 4' h 2 8 0.0 0'
9
• 1 160 0 '
1 1
•
_ Poi":°E. IL I { FARCEL 2
,.,,i
o 8400 S F
I 6800 S -
0
, . 0 -0 I
o o
. i O -
_, o
. • t•-• m
,.. ,
_.00 r I 1,..ol" I
1 It. 270.
4
1
I
9193
. , •. cc) . i .
:. 1
.,
-i r41
2.1 . ,.. 1 _
•
ai I 1 I • __
-o 01
i -•- • > PARC E 3 I PAR CIEL 4 0
1 "0 -o 1
1 ,..r.r:. __ _ _ _
o 0
a 400 S.F %.116800 S
,--,1
_
1 I 20 00'1.1mo-vroisr irt ;.
t‘i 160 00'
----....--,:,----
i ! ° 2-3 e-' '•
1
N 71
1.: 1 • 30' •
. ;
1 .. . . ,-.•
i .
•
1 1 , .
. , .
• 1 •
. . • 1 •
Engineering
1 . Curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage and pavement required on Powell
Ave. S.
2. Storm drainage retention/detention plan with calculations required.
9.,(Afrr
)"43
Utilities
1 . Standard fees l /sq.ft. Water and Sewer.
2. Sub Standard. Water main in Powell m*st be replaced, across property
frontage with 8" ductile iron pipe.
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : o Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
OPolice Department
Public Works Department
Building Div.
x'C Engineering Div.
6 Traffic Engineering Div.
Utilities Engineering Div .
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his designee)
N(c.6t-/�sc.._ 51v'1 I-ri l- DATE : 4 /41-7F
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE MAJOR PLAT
SITE APPROVAL j1)9x i.l.. 154141012_- 7# HORT PLAT
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION
' AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 1:/447/
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTME
Department : Z•G.06
Ap9Zvi Cl bl .S xyr JL
alien :
__, - e.--- .:.- (/ _ L___-- i1/7-7}
Signature of Dir or or Authorized R presentative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
De artment : `6
Comments :
4 / V `/ `� Vl ! -�-- / //
Signature of Director or Auth ►'i"ed" Representative Date
` I
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : �� of�c �'�? 176-e -71Z
/Commenf erzove` .�1 L s4r pr2-o�1i
/4 4ma`s
Signature of Director or Authorized presentative Date !
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
De artment : UTic_ n(cs
/.� 'vim A-
�7z-o U.E
Com ��
A,(Le
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comment
�1 �E El 17I5 AI1►lover
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments :
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO: ® Finance Department
8 Fire Department
Library Department
OPark Department
8 Police Department
Public Works Department
Building Div.
Engineering Div .
8 Traffic Engineering Div.
Utilities Engineering Div.
FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his designee)
illic_44ILG Mn- 4 DATE : 6`11ficf
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
REZONE MAJOR PLAT
SITE APPROVAL _ SHORT PLAT
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT i.U4 LL
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION .i - 1K 1-7g LACE or-)
' AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE do 217/
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : e LD 6
( A toprickik's : Pi SAivrzoVe--
Commen
‘---/I- V
Signature of ' rector or Authoriz - Representative Date
r,
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : /dLl ,
0 /-� r2-o J I Dl.S a .i r
Comments :
(_ , / •
Signatur�of Director r Aut: prized Representative Date
y �
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : J ?-2 >-f,/�
hComments :
J
Signature of Director or Authorized Repr sentative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Dp_p artment : v T"ct t
— AnYe__Dvc !� ��►5���rJ
Comments :
Signature of Director or Z
g Authorized Representative Date
rt
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
C�► A rz-ove P13aPP V6
Comments:
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : r
AP'Yzov►z atTrzo V e
Comments :
•
,Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
CITY OF RENTON
•
X SHORT PLAT. PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. 54.E d -ir6-73
h1AJOR PLAT ��qq,,T DATE REC' D. 7�
TENTATIVE ® `�!O APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL
V 8 19TB REVIEW FEE $
N 1" RECEIPT NO. U/
,d SM NO.
741— Q4� PUD NO.
j
NGv�
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS I THROUGH 7:
1. Plat Name & Location Eager Short Plat
*, NE4 and NZ SE4 of Sec. 13; T23N; R4E, W.M.
2 . No. Lots '4 • Total Acreage 1 . l 6 Zoning R-1
3 .. Owner Russell Eager ' Phone 255 0582
Address �53 Thomas Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa.
5. Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed
Telephone ( ) ( ) ( )
Electric Puget Power ( X ) ( ) ( )
Street Lights ; ' ( ) (X ) : ( )
Natural Gas ( _ •) (X; ) '. ( )
TV Cable ( ) (X ) ( )
6. Sanitation & Water:
( X ) City Water ( X ) Sanitary Sewers
( ) Water District No . ( ) " Dry Sewers
( ) Septic Tank
7. Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance.
8. DATE REFERRED TO:
ENGINEERING PARKS
BUILDING HEALTH
TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY
FIRE COUNTY PLANNING
BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER
9. STAFF ACTION:
TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED
APPEALED EXPIRED
0. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION:
SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
1 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT • . " APPEALED EXPIRED
2 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS :
DATE DATE BOND NO. AND
TYPE • GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT
Planning Dept .
RPv. 1i 77
•
•
•
• • AFFIDAVIT
•
1 , Russell Eager and Charlotte Eager , being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. .
Subscribed and sworn before me
this. ,� day of , 194, . .
Notary Public in nd for the S ate of •
Washington, residing at %O41/ •
/,-,
eon' /�-� •
a e of Notary Public) S;l tu
ig/4re of Ovine ' �
•
c=?5‘ e,,e_il-1 �r�. �o l :�� - o c. . / /a(--:•& C----- ,z-Ti
am,
`s. • (Address)
(Address)
„, , ... . . (jr,a2A 44.4V, •
(ICity) S . (State)
. — 3
5 - ...„-si.2., • .
(Te e•
27)
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) •
CERTIFICATION
•
This is' to certify that e foregoing application has been inspected by me
and has been found t RE ugh and complete in every particular and to
conform to the rul ��n re i�, ions of the Renton Planning Department '
governing the fit _vg V6h icatior..
•
•
U �� 8 1g1$1 9 B .
Date Received
A ,ts`
Renton Planning Dept .
2-73
\
• <o- 1 01
•• 7i oral r
� 4 Mi
,Lr•
'Gw'
NORMAN ASSOCIATES,-INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS• EVERGREEN BUILDING,SUITE 509 • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055• PHONE: (206) 235-1544
' I
J
June 8; 1978
,fJ i.
City of Renton
Planning Department
City Hall •
Renton, Wa. 98055
Good Morning:
This is a request for an exception for pipestem lots for
paragraph 2 and 4 Eager Short Plat. The pipe stems are necessary
to allow development of the 4 lots and to provide for properly
shaped lots. Two checks in the amount of $100.00 each are
enclosed .
J E. Norman ((-) R-//,/gib
S78001 JUpd `,,
:1\922� ‹, ` I
4.
- 1
lI
COASTAL • HYDRAULIC • ENVIRONMENTAL • CIVIL • SURVEYING
•
•
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON /�` RECEIVED
1>'(;':\
• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
• •
• JUIV 1979
ro
•
•
__.. �NGDE� " .
0R• UF ICE USE ONLY' � `� ./ l' j • ::f7 . .lf. _
Application No. - /� 71' _
.
.
- Environmental Checklist No. �4 C- ��-
PROPOSED-, date FINAL •
,. date: ..:•:,, .
EiDeclaration of Significance. Declaration of Significance
EjDeclaration of'•Non- Significance; . 0Declaration,- of Non-Significance..-• •�.:.. _..: .'`
COMMENTS :., _ • •
- Introduction The State• Environmental 'Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW,. requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their ,
owl actions and when licensing private .proposals . The Act also 'requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major-actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
• The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a •
proposal is such a major action. -
• Please answer the following questions, as completely as. you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary'. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- • •
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
' agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay. ' ,
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license.• for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers •
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all .
of the agencies which will be. involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
' •
• out duplicating paperwork in • the future.
' NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not- apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply_, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
' ENVIRONMENTAL- CHECKLIST FORM -
I . BACKGROUND ' •
i . Name of Proponent ____Don Weitkamp •____ __ .
t. Address and phone number of Proponent : •
2726 N.E. 88th • ' '
Seattle,- Wa. 98115
522 79 •
44 •• ' . . . . •
3. Date Checklist submitted •
4. Agency requiring Checklist — Ci'ty_ enton
. 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: '
Eager Short Plat
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
It is proposed that a 1 . 15 acre tract of land be dev.ided " into 4 lots, .
•
•
t:
[ ., •
• -2- �.
' 7. Location of proposal. '(describe the physical setting of the proposal ,' as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including
,:any other information, needed to give an accurate understanding of the 'environ- '
mental_,set.ti-ng--of.the" proposal ) : „
' 8. Estimated date..for completion of:; the: proposal : . -
• 9. - List of all permits,.: licenses.-or. government approvals required for the proposal :
(federal , state and-local--including rezones) :
•
10. Do you have any plans. for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected• with this proposal?_. If yes, •explain:
-. P?-,,.-. �pp'-o..ai .. .
11...- Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property' covered by . . .
. _. your proposal? If,yes.,• explain:
12. Attach any other application form that .has been completed regarding the pro •
-
- posal ; if none has. been completed, but is expected to. be. filed at some future • .
date, describe the. nature of such application form: ;, . . . . ,
•
II._ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
' (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
-
(1) Earth. Will .the proposal result in: . . ,
(a) Unstable earth. conditions or in changes in geologic_ , '
:. '
•
• .-. - : . substructures?.. %.. . ..x
S. MAYBE .`
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- - -
' - '-' covering of the soil? • , .
X
' . YES MAYBE NO'_
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features? '
. vEr— MAYBE WC— -.
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
- • unique geologic or physical features? •_ •
' • . ...YES MAYBE NO .
'(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,- : .. . .
either- on or off the site? X
. . YES • . MAYBE NO - .
• (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands; or. -
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which .. •
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
' bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X
YES -MBE' NO
Explanation: (b & 'c) There will- -be excavatioh-for :dr_iveways_.. .
•
• (e) There will be an interim period during construction
• • of.- house-.foundations when....soils will be exposed: .- • - . _ •
•
�j• -3-
(2) A-ir. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? X
YES MAYBE NO
(b). The creation of objectionable odors? ' X
TES MAYBE NO
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture- or temperature,
or any -change in climate, either locally- or
regionally? - _X_... '.
Y MAYBE. NO
Explanation: . blown dust __ ..
(a`)`` Some wind—
•
(3) Water. - Will the proposal: result.,in:
(a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of
water movements in".ei ther "mari ne or:, fresh. waters? -. .
(b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X
YES MAYBE. NO
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body? X
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to ,
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X
YES MAYBE NO
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality,, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, _ -
' phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, -
or other substances into the ground waters? X
YES MAYBE NO
(i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
• : for public water supplies? X
ES Firirgir NO :
Explanation: (b) The new roads and houses will reduce. the absorption
rates. (h) There may be minor leaks in the sanitary sewer
(4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops ,
microflora and aquatic .plants)? X
YES FTTNE . NO
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? X
YES. MAYBE NO
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing .
species? X
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
YES MA BE NO
Explanation: (a) The area wi l if be cleared of Alder. ,
-q_
•
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
•
(a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)? X '
YES MAYBE :' NO
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna? X
• YES MAYBE NO .-
• (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result::.in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?.: X
.:.. ,ES YBE . NO
(d) - Deterioration to- existingfish. or wildlife habitat? X
.YES . MAYBE NO
Explanation: (a) .Field mice: (d) Area` is ppresently. undeveloped - -
(6) Noise. Will the proposal increase- existing noise levels? X
• .YES-. :.MAYBE --NO
Explanation:
•
(7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare? X i
YES MAYBE fro
Explanation: Norman street lighting
•
(8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the - '
present or planned land use of an area?
Y-ES MAYBE N0
Explanation: —_--- —
(9). Natural Resources. WiII the proposal result in :
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?, X
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? .
YES . MAYBE NO ,
Explanation:
•
(10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk .of an =
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
YES - MAYBE NO
Explanation:
( 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location ,. distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area? ' -
YE MMAY'BE NO
Explanation: -" in so far-as ho'uses ' being.`built On the site- instead
-- of elsewhere.
-5-
( 12) Housing. Will t'flc proposal affect existing housing, v.
create a demand for additional housing? X
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result. in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand
for new parking? X
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Impact upon- existing transportation systems? X
TES— MAYBE NO
(d) Alterations to present patterns of 'circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? X
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Alterations to waterborne, -rail or air traffic? X
YES . MAYBE NO
(f) . Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ,
bicyclists or pedestrians? X
YES MAYBE NO •
Explanation: (c) very minor.
(14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
(a) Fire protection? X
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Police protection? X
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Schools?. X
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X
YES MAYBE . NO
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X
YES MAYBE NO
' (f) Other governmental services? X
YES MAYBE. NO
Explanation: (e) There will be an additional 250 '. of road to be
survi.ced by.. the city. .
(15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require , X
the development of new sources of energy?
• YES M YBE W
Explanation: (a) As far as the new construction is concerned for roads
and houses substantial quantities will be expended
(16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems , or alterations to the following utilities :
(a) Power or natural gas? X
YES MAYBE NO
(b) . Communications systems? X
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Water? X
YES MAYBE NO
| ^~
� ` =
. -8- . �
. "
� ' ' ~
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
| X '
. YE S— MAYBE NO`
(e) Storm water drainage? k
_ , TE S pTYQE N7�'
(f) Solid waste and disposal? X .
T��- MAYBE �T�' `
' '
.
[xpl�nation; There are no existing gas l |na �
�--_- -
;
(%7) Human Health. Will thepruposal result in the creation of
any health hazard ur' potential health hazard (excluding �
'
'
mental health)? � ` _ �
YES— NAY8� -90— �
Explanation;
'
' '
(18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive _
site open to public view? ` XL_
YES— MAYBE
' NO
Explanation: '
`
- --- ---
`
(19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
Y[5 MAYBE NO `
�
Explanation: `
`
(20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of u significant archoulugical or historical
sitei st.ructvre, object or building? '
Y��—� MAYBE �N7�-
. '
� Explanation:
'---
`
`
ll[- SIGNATURE
1 . the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above infurmatiun
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful ack of full disclosure on my part.
'
Proponent� ' .
�s/yneo/ ^ ,
Don E. W61tkam'
P
' (name printed)
City of Renton '
` Planning Department '.
_ 5-76
'
' '
'
_
I
,;i
f :';i! t ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
,i
TO: O Finance Department
L Fire Department
';, ; Library Department
! l= (Ti Park Department
;i
� , Police Department
i . Public Works Department
,:.,;;; j1 Building Div.
1,1 0 Engineering Div .
!�' '; Traffic Engineering Div .
Utilities Engineering Div .
'' FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
ill :: his designee)
. ;,: )(( - L Sidi ITt DATE : 4 /41-74)9
i,'; r; PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
A`' REZONE MAJOR PLAT
r;.
SITE APPROVAL lci) l,L hAG,— VL /A 7• HORT PLAT
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
rriC' SHORELINE MANAGEMENT '
' PERMIT OR EXEMPTION
.[.. AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1,r, ! WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 9/1....(/7 j
ry REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTME ,
kDepartment : 4) 6
ii-..4limen. ff:z44'5 ot 171sArrexJA
::,!:.:
":<-**"..-- 7,-*ter-- C.....11.9 _ ', et oee-Ze----- ‘/7-- ))
' I ; Signature of Dir or or Authorized R presentative Date
I ' .' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
I' De artment : �; r
Comments .
Signature of Director Auth flied Representative Date
:,t-'
RVVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
•
Department : ` //1%
Comment ': q CtsAIi2►2-o%.1t
1 -1
.j Signature of Director or Authorized presentative `Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
', De artment : UTfLcTJr.S
Com n
ail
1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
L REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Depar ent :
II t JE Q PiSArpl ove"
Commen
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
j Department :
,I
Comments :
, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
Yi
f, -
I J
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
i ii
TO : O Finance Department
f Fire Department
` -, Library Department
0' "'' Park Department
' " Police Department
1 `;°1 Public Works Department
kI Building Div.
i 1 Engineering Div.
it
Traffic Engineering Div .
11
• ,;, Utilities Engineering Div.
;�
t FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
E his designee )
1
f '' dti,c_1.tQelt- tI'r14- DATE : qi 9/7
f
0
, 0 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
REZONE MAJOR PLAT
f : i SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT
11 ,N
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
„,I• SHORELINE MANAGEMENT �U4 C.L . - 2 � �
f1 PERMIT OR EXEMPTION ALA". . - CJ1N-7-78 tA ']-ic.J
r•
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
f
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 4/a1171
H• REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
'; Department : eLD6
i !. pI f it
Comments : � ' ��� ��
,,I,
,i.:<;‘,;e-z---- ‘-71
Signature of I ' rector or Authoriz d Representative Date
:l d1i
ill,
I � ji REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
` -'i Department : /�i%.-.-
0 A-17 F- c.. P I S A re-oNltr
Comments :
p.
.•:: __. Kl(,:.-- -//(7 -7- ---.. _ —
/. .77 /7 E___
' ': Signature-Ko Director r Aut. prized Representative Date
1 IL.
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : I1
7
Department . --)—? �/.‘ . L-7"-Il c-e°y 2/-f ';
.--doments : 1\ • ,a
. 1
• iid-,
ezi , t„-- -----2,„7„5„,
,,,__ ._ itA________, ‘/_:-,„. ,„/7::, , ,.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date `:;-,..
. •{r, t1
1
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ,
Department : v i( c (-c /-&5 i`; ,1
•
Comments : c` p
. i9
I
-�. 1
I
•
;Fi
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ;• ' �
; 1
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : `..
0 ArPrzvve. 1--1 Pi tippr v� p
Comments :
Yi
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date r
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : '�:',i
I�;
Department :
ai0 Aprv►z iAPe9z oL�
Comments : '
'.
,fII
,'
i
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ; i
r1
•i•',
I' 1
I,�j
1
;
H1
i�
.
. ,
' 'j
1
i'.I .
fI
Engineering
1 . Curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage and pavement required on Powell
Ave. S.
2. Storm drainage retention/detention plan with calculations required.
•
"Z:3
f
!' Utilities
It
"F
1 . Standard fees 1 /sq.ft. Water and Sewer.
2. Sub Standard. Water main in Powell milst be replaced acrossproperty
(•� ;; P
I•5 frontage with 8" ductile iron pipe.
I� �1
1+ 1
ri
t
•
•
f ,
If
1i ,3
ia.
it
�4 ��
�,, T;, o THE CITY OF RENTON
t ,-. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. REniTON, WASH. 98055
013 `� ._ `S:e 1 ) CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.o
p„ _el' 235-2550
,r4'ED SEP1E '
July 6 , 1978
Russell Eager
253 Thomas Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington 98055
RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR Applications for 4—lot
Short Plat Approval, File No. 186-78 , and Exception
to the Subdivision Ordinance, File No. E-187-78 ;
property located at Powell Ave. South between S.W.
Langston Road and S.W. 3rd Place.
Dear Mr. Eager:
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on June 8 1978 . A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hiearing Examiner has been
set for July la,_1978 at 9 : 00 A.M. •
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Ericksen
Planning Director
By : it
Mi ael L. Sm' t'Se or Planner
MLS :jb
cc : Norman Associates , Inc.
0 l
, ' , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
It
''1 >. RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
!r=', AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON,
l- WASHINGTON, ON JULY 18 , 19 8 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER
., THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
S1.. RUSSELL EAGER, Files 18 �and E-187-78, APPLI-
CATION FOR 4-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL AND APPLICA-
' , TION FOR EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
• _. REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS; property located at
Powell Ave. S. between S.W. Langston Road and
S.W. 3rd Place.
i;
i', 1 2. R. L. UNDSDERFER, BITNEY REALTY, Files 190-78 and
E-191-78, APPLICATION FOR 3-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL
AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION
{ ` ORDINANCE REGARDING LOT FRONTAGE; property located
,, % on Cedar Avenue South between South 4th Street and
South 6th Street.
'1 `4 3. J & F INVESTMENT COMPANY (FERNWOOD) , Files PP-192-78
iii / AND E-205-78, APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
'1
OF 74-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBDIVISION AND
!.H, APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
+ REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS; property located at Union
''{ n' Avenue S. E. and S.E. Second Place, north of the
,'s
F��" Heather Downs Subdivision.
r,
Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file
in the Renton Planning Department.
j
;j 3
;2
L0,
'
1;
` s ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 18, 1978 AT 9.00 A.M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
' GORDON Y. ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED July 7, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
„ 7.
r,
CERTIFICATION
'=, I, STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
:' ?' OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn
to before me, a Notary Public,
'' on the 5th day of July 1
':, 19 78
SIGNED d'/Cc.,z -1 ,
pQ '
t{, A t,,t;:,1.�,_ �\\\ \\�J.A.1
NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE
p HEARING EXAMINER
G R E/ RENTON,WASHINGTON
` � AI
PTUBLIC HEARING
WILL BE HELD BY THE
70 ('(1�'�D �A RE HEARING LAND USE
1` 'y EXAMINER AT
Affidavit of Publti�n 1` HIS RE4ULAR MEETING
15.1
IN THE COUNCIL CHAM-
BERS, CITY HALL, RE-
JU�. 2 Z I NTON,WASHINGTON,ON
•�'� 4i,1JULY 18, 197g. AT 9:00
STATE OF WASHINGTON ss. •'••' A.M. TO CONSIDER THE
COUNTY OF KINGVer..'
'��// FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
P��/ 1. RUSSELL EAGER,
��G� Files,- 1, APP-78 I AE-
1S7_78, APPLICA-
r ' - . ' TION FOR 4-LOT
being first duly sworn on
SHORT PLAT AP-
PROVAL AND APPLI-
oaih,deposes and says that his the ^•�i a.¢ t e�rk of CATION FOR EX-
CEPTION TO THE•
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) SUBDIVISION ORDI-
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and NANCE REGARD-
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred I N G PIPESTEM
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- LOTS; property lo-
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, cated at Powell Ave.
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained S. between S.W.
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton Langston Road and
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the S.W. 3rd Place.
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 2. R. L.3rdUN Place. ER,
''•,ablic s-�.arin`- BITNEY REALTY,
Washington.That the annexed is a Files 190-78 and E- •
1 91-78, APPLICA-
TION FOR 3-LOT
SHORT PLAT AP-
PROVAL AND APPLI-
CATION FOR EX-
as it was published in regular issues(and CEPTION TO THE
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period SUBDIVISION ORDI-
NANCE REGARD-
ING LOT FRON-
1 TAGE; property lo-
of consecutive issues,commencing on the cated on Cedar Av-
enue South between
day of ,19 ,and ending the South 4th Street and
South 6th Street.
3.J & F INVESTMENT
•r 7 11v Ili COMPANY (FERN-
dayof ,19 both dates WOOD), Files PP-
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- 192-78 AND E-205-
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee 78, APPLICATION
FOR PRELIMINARY
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $1 1 which PLAT APPROVAL OF
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the 7 4-LOT SINGLE
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent FAMILY RESIDENCE
insertion. ar, SUBDIVISION AND
..E , C nlp AXCEICAEP71OION FOR
EXCEPTION TO THE
SUBDIVISION ORDI-
NANCE REGARD-
C'.:ie` Cli:r-: ING PIPESTEM
LOTS; property lo-
cated at Union Av-
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 7 day of enue S.E. and S.E.
Second Place, north
of the Heather Downs
1913
Subdivision.. ,
Legal descriptions of all
applications noted above on
I file in the Renton Planning
Notary Public . and for the State of Washi on, Department.
residing at Kent, King nty. ALL INTERESTED PER
SONS TO SAID PETITIONS
r ARE INVITED TO BE PRE-
- Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June SENT AT THE PUBLIC
9th, 1955. HEARING ON JULY 18,
f 1978, AT 9:00 A.M. TO
Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, I EXPRESS THEIR OPI
adopted by the newspapers of the State. NIONS.
GORDON Y. EL.RICKISEGN
RENTON PD AI
PublishedThe,,.�hroni le JJuly7
0
RENTON CITY COUNCIL
PLANNING AND . DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
COMMITTEE REPORT
Date: August 21 , 1978
TO : Council Members
FROM : Planning and Development Committee •
RE : APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
RUSSELL EAGER SHORT PLAT , 186-78
RUSSELL EAGER EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE , E-187-78
The Planning and Development Committee , after examination
of the record and the Hearing Examiner ' s written decision ,
findings , and conclusions pursuant to Section 4-3017 ,
recommends that the City Council concur in the recommenda-
tion of the Hearing Examiner .
George Perry, Chairman
Barbara Shinpoch , Member
Patricia Seymour-Thorpe
•
• . )
•
�3
. 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055
z o .
oA CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR. • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
p,0 0 • L. RICK BEELER.. 235-2593 '
4lEO SE PSG'
August 7, 1978 '
• Members, Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
RE: File No: Short Plat 186-78, E-187-78; ,Russell Eager.
•
•
Dear Council Members: •
•
An .appeal was received on the referenced application on August 4,
1978 .within the appeal period.established by. ordinance. Attached
is the letter of appeal as well as the Examiner's Report, dated
July 21,, 1978.
•
According 'to guidelines of the. Hearing Examiner .Ordinance, this
matter should appear on the Council agenda on August 21, 1978,
following a 28-day period after publication of 'the report. •
•
If you require additional information or assistance regarding
this matter, please contact the undersigned.
•
Sincete ,--
.
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department S •
City Clerk '
RE REAL , l
MOORS & MOORE . T. .
1 15 BURNETT AVE. SO.
RENTON, WA: 9E3055 •2$45'6 ist
226-5777„ .\ '1
(11g1a
August 4, 1978. �, A� r`'1
cjw EQ ,
C111
of REIAN•
�O
CLERK'S OFFICE )
City of Renton
Re: Eagar Short Plat, File No. Short Plat 186-78, E-187-78.
I am hereby filing an appeal on the Short Plat known as Eagar Short
Plat and the requirement imposed by the Hearing Examiner for the 50'
right of way to serve 3 lots.
The requirement for. 50' is contrary to the staff report prepared by
the Planning Department, which would require 25' with 14' of paving.
The 14' of paving and 25' right of way is consistent with former
requirements made by the City Council: such as Ross Short Plat and
Colman Short Plat in N.E. Renton.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Don E. Weitkamp, PH. D.
DEW:b
•
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
State of Washington)
)
County of King
•
Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states: •
That on the 21st day of .July , 19 78 , affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
i
/;f,:•C �� �1 ,✓ -C «�,Q�C�,,�
•
Subscribed and sworn this f'k_=day of -�,J\ •
. • •
\\*.
‘.).1 H‘i\ .
Notary Public in and tor the 6tate
of Washington , residing at Renton
Application , Petition or Case : Sh. P1. 186-78, E-187-78; Ruas11 Eager
,n(,t,,t, ; c ',stain a US.t 06 the patn.ti.ee o6 &econd)
July 21, 1978
•
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION .
APPLICANT: Russell Eager FILE NO. Short Plat 186-78
E-187-78
LOCATION: Approximately 150 feet south of the southeast corner of Powell
Avenue S.W. and S.W. Langston Road.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a proposed 4-lot short plat and
an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow two (2)
20-foot pipestems to provide access to separate rear lots.
SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval of short plat
with dedicated half-street.
Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of short plat with
50-foot right-of-way.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on July 11, 1978.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application, and
field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
The hearing was opened on July 18, 1978 at 9:07 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Renton Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following
additional exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: Revised Short Plat Map
Exhibit #3: Short Plat Map as submitted
Mr. Smith indicated that the short plat map had been revised to eliminate the requirement
for two pipestems and provide access via a half-street on the southern boundary of the
property. He noted that the width of the half-street designated on Exhibit #2 had been
revised from 20 tO 25 feet to provide access alternatives for future land use and
subdivisions in the area, and although sidewalks would not be required, paving, curbs,
gutters, and drainage control would be appropriate requirements for the request. Mr.
Smith advised that departmental comments attached to Exhibit #1 pertained to Exhibit #3,
short plat map as originally submitted by the applicant.
The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1.
Responding was:
John Norman
Norman Associates, Inc.
Evergreen Building, Suite 509
Renton, WA 98055
Mr.. Norman indicated certain objections to the report. He referenced departmental comments
from the Engineering and Utilities Division which responded to configurations denoted on
Exhibit #3, noting that revisions contained in Exhibit #2 would require improvement and
requirements relating to the proposed half-street on the southern boundary of the property,
including paving, curb and necessary sewer and water on the half-street. He also
objected to requirements for installation of a large detention facility on the four-lot
parcel as being unreasonable.
The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the request. There was no
response. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for clarification that the site contained
sufficient acreage for the applicant to provide a 50-foot dedicated street. Mr. Smith
advised that the size of the site was adequate for provision of the street, but lot size
Short Pla.. -J6-78 Page Two
E-187-78
would be substantially impacted. The Examiner inquired if the L-shape configuration at
the end of the half-street would require an exception from the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr.
Smith felt that the configuration would be considered as part of the design of the half-
street and, therefore, would not require an exception. The Examiner inquired if
improvement of the half-street would be a design consideration upon completion of the
entire street dependent upon development to the east and south of the subject site, and
if the proposed configuration met design requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr.
Smith indicated that for future development purposes a full hammerhead configuration
consisting of 40 by 80-foot turning radius was possible, but the applicant proposed to
pave the end of the hammerhead to provide a 20 by 40-foot turnaround which he felt met
the intent of the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance.
The Examiner noted Mr. Norman's objection to provision of storm drainage facilities as
recommended by staff and inquired regarding proposed alternatives. Mr. Norman indicated
his concurrence in joining the existing storm drainage facilities in the arga, but
proposed that in lieu of a large detention facility, a small weir be constructed to
control storm water run-off on the property. He estimated costs of construction of a
detention facility which he felt were unreasonable for a four-lot plat.
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for revisions or modifications to Exhibit #1. Mr. Smith
indicated that Exhibit #1 would remain as submitted, and noted that revisions regarding
design and storm drainage proposed by Mr. Norman could be reviewed with the Engineering
Division.
The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No.
Short Plat 186-78 and E-187-78 was closed by the Examiner at 9:30 a.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter,
the Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is for approval of a short plat of four single family lots and an exception
to allow two pipestem lots. A revised short plat (Exhibit #2) eliminated the pipestem
lots.
2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies
and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter,
and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as
set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible
official; determined that the proposal is exempt from the threshold determination ,
and EIS requirements of SEPA.
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed.
6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity.
7.. .The proposal is compatible with the setbacks, lot coverage and lot area requirements
of Section 4-706 (R-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances.
Parcel No. 1, the corner lot, is platted larger than the other lots per Section
9-1108.23.F. (4) .
8. Sufficient area exists within the subject site to accommodate a dedicated public
right-of-way of 50 feet and still permit four single family lots. Per Section
9-1108.23.F. (2) , all of the lots must front on a ". . .public street or road with a
width of not less than. . . " 50 feet.
The proposal, as revised per Exhibit #2, features a 20-foot half-street and 20-foot
by 40-foot L-shaped turn-around. Per Section 9-1108.23.A. (5) a street right-of-way
should be 50 feet. Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) provides for hammerhead turn-arounds of
40 feet by 80 feet. Section 9-1108.23.A. (8) provides for temporary turn-arounds of
a diameter of 80 feet pending extension of the street or completion ". . .beyond the
boundary of the original subdivision. " Private streets are expressly prohibited
under Section 9-1108.23.A. (9) .
Short Plat 186-78 Page Three
E-187-78
9. Opposition was expressed by the applicant of the requirement to provide on-site
storm water retention system. Section IX.C, Ordinance No. 3174 (Renton Storm and
Surface Water Drainage Ordinance) , requires retention/detention facilities for
handling ". . .surface water in excess of the peak discharge. . . ". The proposal does
not fall within the exceptions of Section V. (A) of Ordinance No. 3174. Specific
storm drainage control plans were not submitted into the record.
10. The applicant disagreed with the Public Works Department requirement that the existing
substandard water main in Powell Avenue S.W. be replaced along the property (Exhibit
#1, Staff Report) . It was contended that the utilities that are required should only
be in the proposed half-street.
11. Restrictive covenants were not submitted (Section 9-1105.3.B) .
12. An affidavit was contained in the file of record attesting to the ownership of the
subject property (Section 9-1106. 3.H. (1) .
13. The proposed half-street has not been dedicated for public use (Section 9-1106.3.H. (2) .
14. A survey of the property has been made by a licensed land surveyor (Section
9-1106. 3.H. (3) .
15. Certification from the King County Health and Finance Departments and from the City
of Renton Finance Department will occur just prior to, during, or immediately
following filing of the plat with King County (Section 9-1106.3.H. (4) , (7) , & (8) .
16. Improvements have not been installed and a deferment or waiver have not been requested
(Section 9-1106.3.H. (5) .
17. A title insurance policy has not been provided (Section 9-1106.3.H. (6) .
18. Bills of sale for utilities have not been provided (Section 9-1106.3.H. (9) .
19. Off-site improvements are required on Powell Avenue S.W.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan and the general character of the
neighborhood.
2. Unless an exception application is filed and the criteria of Section 9-1109 found to
be applicable, the Examiner lacks authority to approve half-streets under the
Subdivision 'Ordinance, Chapter 11. Section 9-1108.23.F. (2) requires that each lot
in the plat front on a public street or road, which per Section 9-1108.23.A. (5) must
be 50 feet in width. The referenced short plat application, File No. 088-77 (Ross) ,
contained the same conclusions, which were upheld by the City Council upon appeal,
and additional right-of-way was acquired to form a public street.
The same conclusion is true for the proposed turnaround which does not meet the
criteria of Sections 9-1108.23.A. (7) and (8) . An exception application is required.
3. The Public Works Department is required by Ordinance No. 3174 to review and approve
the storm drainage plan for the proposal. This can be accomplished prior to final
approval fo the plat per Section 9-1105.7.
4. The issue of replacing the water line in Powell Avenue S.W. can be resolved with the
Public Works Department. Perhaps an LID for upgrading the water line should be
instituted along the street. Testimony provided the Examiner with no specific
information with which to draw a more specific conclusion.
5. Completion of the certification requirements of Section 9-1106.3.H. must occur prior
to final approval by staff of the plat.
6. Although the applicant was following guidance by staff in revising the application
(Exhibit #2) , the Examiner is prevented from approving the short plat without provision
of acceptable access to the short plat. Either access and turn-arounds are provided
per the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance (dedicated 50-foot public right-of-
way) or exception applications are filed for deviation from these requirements.
1� s
Short Flat 186-78 Page Four
E-187-78 \_--------
DECISION:
Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's decision
to approve the short plat subject to:
1. Providing access via a 50-foot dedicated public right-of-way and required turn-around
or granting of exceptions thereto by the Examiner.
2. Approval by the Public Works Department of the storm drainage plan.
3. Resolution by the Public Works Department of replacing the existing water line in
Powell Avenue S.W. An LID should be investigated to accomplish the purpose of
upgrading the water line.
4. Completion of certification per Section 9-1106.3.H.
ORDERED THIS 21st day of July, 1978.
eeler
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of July, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of
record:
Russell Eager, 253 Thomas Avenue S.W. , Renton, WA 98055
John Norman, Norman Associates, Inc. , Evergreen Building,
Suite 509, Renton, WA 98055
TRANSMITTED THIS 21st day of July, 1978 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before August 4, 197,8. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within
fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set
forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after
review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and
meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for
inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be
purchased at cost in said office.
•
1 0
: ^: 4S
NO "MAN ASSOCIATES, INC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS• EVERGREEN BUILDING,SUITE 509 • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055• PHONE: (206) 235-1544 -�
June 8;' 1978 �, ;A .
r.
O i
City of Renton
Planning Department
City Hall
Renton, Wa. 98055
Good Morning:
This is a request for an exception for pipestem lots for
paragraph 2 and 4 Eager Short Plat. The pipe stems are necessary
to allow development of the 4 lots and to provide for properly
shaped lots. Two checks in the amount of $100.00 each are
enclosed .
J,h E Norman ' (Jr ,/?
zy-
0:14t,
S78001 (-0 .49/8
`'UN
DEPAS
COASTAL • HYDRAULIC • ENVIRONMENTAL • CIVIL • SURVEYING
J
CITY OF RENTON
X SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. E- 177"77
.MAJOR PLAT ,�REA17% DATE REC' D,
TENTATIVE ® 'V APPLICATION FEE $ 100.00
1:1-PRELIMINARY. /'� Ng-) ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL 19T6 REVIEW FEE $
S
� Z RECEIPT NO. :.) v"
s6�
SM NO., Y @b4� PUD NO.
9'
SIN G v�
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 :
1. Plat Name & Location Eager Short Plat
53, NEk and NZ SE of Sec. 13; T23N; R4E, W.M.
2 . No. Lots 4 Total Acreage 1 . 16 Zoning R-1
3.. Owner Russell Eager Phone 255 0582
Address 253 Thomas Avenue Southwest Renton, Wa.
5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed
Telephone ( ) ( ) ( )
Electric Puget Power ( X ) ( ) ( )
Street Lights ; ( ) (X ) ( )
Natural Gas ( ) (X+ ) . . (• )
. TV Cable ( ) (X ) ( )
6. Sanitation & Water:
( X ) City Water ( X ) Sanitary Sewers
( ) Water District No . ( ) Dry Sewers
( ) Septic Tanks
7. Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance.
8. . DATE REFERRED TO:
ENGINEERING PARKS _
BUILDING HEALTH
.TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY
FIRE COUNTY PLANNING
BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER
9. STAFF ACTION:. •
TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED • DENIED
APPEALED EXPIRED
0. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'S ACTION :
--____SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
1 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
2 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS :
DATE ' DATE BOND NO. AND
TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT
r
Plannin; Dept.
11110 •
AFFIDAVIT
Russell Eager and Charlotte Eager , being duly sworn, declare that I
am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the
foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information
herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief.
Subscribed and sworn before me
this day of , 194,
Notary Public in ( nd for the S ate of
Washington, residing at .7d4
Ida e of Notary Public) .g atur�e/of wne L'
(Address) (Address)
, (r1:171.2:
/ 7
((City) "A (State)
•
{ � � \ CiO
(Te1,phone)
/
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
RR CERTIFICATION
This is to certify t' "Othe`Lf�/rie ing application has been inspected by me
and has been found be r u nd complete in every particular and to
conform to the r�zl ` n@� -•.uiat o of the Renton Planning Department
governing the fill gjof such
la.plic tion .
Date . Received .0 ---"'. , 434 By :
,N6 D� t4
N
•
•
Renton Planning Dept.
9-7 7
Engineering
1 . Curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage and pavement required. on Powell
Ave. S.
2. Storm drainage retention/detention plan with calculations required.
911,170(
Utilities
1 . Standard fees le/sq.ft. Water and Sewer.
2. Sub Standard. Water main in Powell mist be replaced across property
frontage with 8" ductile iron pipe.
•
.. ..,,.... �' ....:.............t.....r.,.•�.,.: -.•n, .. l�;i�;'��P.;;::.,,:,''••: - r.:k=; 1,:12t - ;li; ifir:.i;.i
:.
y
r�
.. :
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : O Finance Department
Fire Department
1,, Library Department
Park Department
Police Department
. 1 Public Works Department
Building Div. . .
i QEngineering Div .
1 ;; Traffic Engineering Div .
f ,;,
,'-'j Utilities Engineering Div .
`; ki • • FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
his designee) .
I N V-l7-A L_ 5Pi I ri- DATE : (o l 7F
' I! 'L PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
{
• '�is�. ; REZONE MAJOR PLAT
I` !'' SITE APPROVAL,. .! �} l..l_, �AC,-0YL � ( 7, H O R T PLAT
I' i' SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
;I' SHORELINE MANAGEMENT
•
,'IV PERMIT OR EXEMPTION
' RI ,;; AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
,4: , WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE G/ir/71
11- -
VT'' ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTME,
• .., Department :
I': ' giiient rr�v� 0 b" S A-Fr r-°0L .
ti;I • .
11/77-?}
Signature of Dir or or Authorized Representative Date
7i
LCi'!' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
•
`` De artment �`r
..,' ;? rrzvor� in 2%S P prLvvL<
f;i • Comments .
41�i1
., 1:1 -T, - , . . L______(1::).-42/
• . . . .a_o_ „ . . . ,
\ a,/ /7,.
'� �` Signature Of Director or Auth r'i'Ed Representative ' - Date
'''il
r' ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
'd L. Depftrtment : 77;- a/ c L_ I'f//i7FL-r/1
'! o mme An5 S• vc 4:1 CI SArpYz- ,i� �
ij;
III ? - 5. -z� a t_z� '
, ,`. Signature of Director or Authorized presentative Date
I,Ft
10
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
1, De artment : VTcc, cn�5
n rev D PI 1-p f-o ki�.
't Com t
. __4_,Le, 2,4—tS ---
; 'II Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
,1 :, REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
,1 L
De artment :
, -'I Commen
1' Isy
•
'I•, It,
IA 7J
T.
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
yl
,
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
i
a;� Department :
;;
-'' Comments :
I,a�
' 11 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
I;1 ';,
ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION
TO : ® Finance Department
!' Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
11
' li Police Department
l', Public Works Department
1
i . Building Div.
/I:11 Engineering Div.
Traffic Engineering Div .
i : , Utilities Engineering Div.
'i _ -'}' FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or
-' his designee )
;. 1 DATE : 6//1/-7(37
I ,+, PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR :
1' ,,, . REZONE MAJOR PLAT
[' !Ili SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT
{
I ii '
i SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
k,,. SHORELINE MANAGEMENTcu49 LL z,
f 1 PERMIT OR EXEMPTION 4--1c*.*-E- IN7-78 0,--1
" S1 AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I. ','; WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE (0/ 07,0?
pji REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
:1' Department : 621-D 6
ti Comments :
x
1. 1
f' ,it
(l J
�;II ��l�f rL P /, ��// ‘—/P- ��
. �` ' f ' r" rector or Authorize Representative Date
0 � Signature o e
` '1.-' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
' Department : / 7
0 A-0712_o.i` Di S arp •ll:;"
Comments :
s. ' K.'-. ^..''' .>' .s-
./p7 /7 i
;; . Signatur of Director r Aut orized Representative Date
;,
110 41,
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : / -, > /_ ; 4, c y //-
Alrptt-‘'‘I Ei s r�l�Yr v
omments :
L' . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
9
11
'I REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
Comments .
j
11
a_;(1 5- z ��ifs
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
41«
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
1; Department : _
Arprz-oqe. l_I Pi 3 A Fp f V
Comments :
ill
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
•
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department :
CI N2(212_0v:1: a f12 QC
Comments :
•
•
:I
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date
1 K
p
li
1
11
I�j
4 o R A 1 AN
41 THE CITY OF RENTON
-,m:armSe, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. nEniiOiv,:Vi.S^. 96055
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9,0 �O 235-2550
�L`�-
��rFD SEP&
July 6 , 1978
Russell Eager
253 Thomas Avenue Southwest
Renton, Washington 98055
RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR Applications for 4—lot
Short Plat Approval, File No. 186-78 , and Exception
to the Subdivision Ordinance, File No. E-187-78 ;
property located at Powell Ave. South between S .W.
Langston Road and S.W. 3rd Place.
Dear Mr. Eager:
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on June 8 , 1978 . A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for July 18 , 1978 at 9 : 00 A.M. •
Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present .
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Ericksen
Planning Director
By
Mi ael L. Sm' t , Se or Planner
MLS :jb
cc : Norman Associates , Inc.
1110 0
I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
Eir
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
4, AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON,
f WASHINGTON, ON JULY 18 , ig , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER
_y_, THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:
A . *1. RUSSELL EAGER, Files 186-78 a E-187-78, PPLI-
; " ` FOR 4-LOT SHORT PLAT APPR V1k--AN PLICA-
4 ,- CATION
1 ° TION FOR EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
1 REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS; property located at
:i; Powell Ave. S. between S.W. Langston Road and
`7 S.W. 3rd Place.
iyv.�
�'
1 2. R. L. UNDSDERFER, BITNEY REALTY, Files 190-78 and
:( L E-191-78, APPLICATION FOR 3-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL' , AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION
; ORDINANCE REGARDING LOT FRONTAGE; property located
+ , on Cedar Avenue South between South 4th Street and
i"1 South 6th Street.
1 3. J & F INVESTMENT COMPANY (FERNWOOD) , Files PP-192-78
AND E-205-78, APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
14' OF 74-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBDIVISION AND
s' s: APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
I!' "` REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS; property located at Union
>q1, Avenue S. E. and S.E. Second Place, north of the
il' "' Heather Downs Subdivision.
iLegal descriptions all applications noted above on file
„ t,„ pons opp
1 in the Renton Planning Department.
i
;z
1
P R
i, {
il
� :.fil
�C
�V
1a��
Jyyyyw
{ 1'
1. yi
i ` ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
1978 18,
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULYAT 9.00 A.M. TO
_.. ` 7I. EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS.
GORDON Y. ERICKSEN
') PUBLISHED July 7, 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
, ��
1,i CERTIFICATION
x
i
. rtI
' • q: , I, STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
~44° OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
"i ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW.
ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn
, ''i to before me, a Notary Public,
M , ) on the 5th day of July
G` ryj 19 78 SIGNED41:2--e7g- --1-,
ENDING "
OF FILE
46/
FILE TITLE