The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA79-307 i - i . .. ,...._ • ',---. ,. I , . . . , 40.-...e, '''''''.1',I: IA A/'•:.,. f-,,,,r'..,',.,i',.]:i\:,F,';;':',?,:;-,-1-'`..'1,-Y.-;'1:k. '161.-..;?;:,;;f:'1,,..i.i I• ..6...; v ,o, ,%,,,..:44 ••,...:,.ti% Aly tii• -•:-: -.'44,,:,. ,.m'Y 4 qz‘e.4-:': ,. ,c6.,NT04, • c2.1 :.•••4, ii74%.4 'i-,.,5,;,:), :4 :.,it,g,i, i-4,7-0:4?v. 47;x..,?• \ /2 c, ._ _ _ A-(87a3S'/,'.11/ . , I 2 7 ' . s-,e $ ,,. . . . • ,.., ,'CIO? / 1(.4(26E0 . .. 04 T- \ • -5-11 °7 FLA / ,.. ?t)1 ANI\OC14C), 2 1605Le • _ ,, / 1,7. -.....4 ,„.. ... .. . - .-- --... N 1 t4 i 1,4, it i‘a • / .'„ ' I, . :......" 'tSt. .. k:,.. o : • . z.7i, .., :., 1 -4,../ ct. _..........._ d _ .. v, ' i ,, . \I''' ------1----------_____ /4cr f i9,f77,110 Iv N4 . . 'ai ; ; .I • v I V . III - Z-;‹, 5Meilcre. i I 1 . Q (‘0 0 r._;T. , .i. _ i -17;feo : 1 . i . . V i t\.) 1:p I 1 I \ 4)i RE IVED . • wi,.... . CITY 0 RENTON ' , . HEARING EXAMINER . t .. MAR 6 1979 . /50 1 0 i AM pm I IL/ 8:::"'"' 'Z'.---'''—'- --------------FrllCi:ll-i211-92—b12- r-2 -'-"—'11 24 940-7e • 7181911011111211a21314i516. . - ITEM NO. ,A. a g° - 77 . . _ DE5472.07-777,0L, . • 712,4 2351 2 .0.50 / 1 VexedA,e6 38_ PA6(' g6, ore /2442-.5 • ;.,e,,,) ,,,,, c,i - .4:,i-,•‘,11;, eox.. 2258 ES0-41r2),4,,i /444.7./. 980.C.0 _ "c" ,..., ,i :: , co,- i C •‘ #4;)-pee,:t36 5, ijiZ 7 ? ?)r--- -- - -- - 72ere..410s or ,e‘io Cp, 14d4:-riy Levs 771d• 1-10,4774 - c2, q.,.:4,-:i.-71---'' ,=:.• „,„ ,: 0 ;;......-.., iq2,51,;?,”ac-/ zz,... f? ,i, P. /V-4pre.f5H444. 77eAlc7:5- Att7 6 a irkeit ce M-6 klir lavIt7reer 45 7; .... :k.)-' , :a ,D2.4 .c.,, ZACr, -.56,n9 . visie,..:.,,,,-s, 441 • . • /17:-6:4544.69 A-0140 77ie Mrh, 6,4„f 64" fy4 - eit----. us:, 41- /,..5t,c 1),),?,44. Xi/A. 04 12Luivi-i, la4sH, z - Pggnzt • : _ . - - 772.4-70 !! , . .„. -... - 2-6....7y I . .,,,ie..6-: /"--- 79004 . . , • ` z 4 , .. . 1.. 4. 1 p I r +� by . ....... ( { : ... ! . ,, „ Y y `� 3 41111M p 3 ,L. . , ..., ... • _.. .„... . ,, _, N i,.. ...__ . i . t ,, ._7.�,� sJ..`S� SCALE i O0 1328.58 - _ t 1 A. S 7- 24-/3 i!! ��. 47 7GO./! /328. 79 I /2./ ao to Sea. G3 RENronr a ta. 294s' - ` :I II � f I RECEIVED I I CITY OF RENTON • : • , I HEARING EXAMINER r' 1 - (Vi vo a„, I ',PR 31979 • 0, 1 AM PM i I i /5 q 01I 71819110111112111213,41516 / ' I N. ry Al ! s 4 'v � � � \ 1 a' oral r XHIBIT NO. • ` "' -�'� N 4 J ITEM I�1 O. f . fi. z-t -I00oJ �, 4/ 87- 3s -/9/s' 0 I I , T�K 7/ N 87- 3S-/9//: • .moo u W I " O/f0 1 1 1 0 . 1 N ck* .i i 150 t ;/ I 124.70 ; h ,ro tit - LL1 I o`6/ f 0/51 1 m a. h• Q • k * 'V B7- 4<4-2SAi-. 1Sn 4 f . 1Q 725. 3/ 375.3, 9 111 7409o40S73 g il y a' 2 S40 99 1 e�i 140 I /" I (� 0 I � � I 2 0 1 0/49 I r a o1 , . I ig ki 4 3o tk 66 1 ;.�o j4 �, 3 I Ag2�i B7 /3os I sJ Ns PA It I .', I 0/45 0141 s OW '1 o/4tt I s.87-S3-a/E- c,) 80 7x 1 % / g7- S3[3/1" a.rl. 90 0 ^187- 53- 3//•r, Si/, i s I 703.90 //f. ,/G ') I Al.2?9. 88 I 0/35 14- . 013I I o I /GS.63 -:3/. e�7 /6S, `f 0`1 /2 "I n //� 0136 0/37 1 00k10 1-114-773 2. • , A7-W /0!- .. YQi I t j • I � � �� 3420��2 oI¢T V0L 2 " / I ,r,� I � a3 v Ni °tq bGOvo044 0030 ooto vote Ot42 e nel 4) 4' , 4 007 sr.73c '�• ,� 4 I !L --a- - , E. I07TH. PL. f so T '^'o ''.4".I. �/ h/'I I quo I M ,_ 0oGt Z o� a.�4 I I o I N� et Ow' i cn �E voL.84�i 4370319 � £ 1 ; 0040 Ni IAJ(V /dK 7B /JO.6 7 , 3.5 N es- 02 -30 is- N C) I //0 en 3Si s3 2a/s3 7I f I 250. 37 �I iS •7 s3-o✓� , • so N I • + I 6 n o I , i s 3' 6 8 \ v f 16 CI NI 4 .4S /31B• jN. 41 4 ^ I 's'-.s. V, app p h 00l03 ,�. P4'11 p 41 N \' /�`Q.- `�. J. (.. 000, �1W 44 °ob c'+I`14.56b�v - 1-0 �? y9 25e 6*9 ' 1 0 A ` p i e aW p0 t i i ‘t .4, 4.47gr.-/V WI' ' i 7.......,„,../Pe :.. . ' ''' • iiii,felt, - .14 .. • .• '.....' I \Ft .." g ot ..-,, -; .7. .,.-f*--, ..,`; •. ' . 71 '', .4.1, ,..;4' s eel, i 'Fx _ye,�►} lei *1 z:! VI �•1y. n i At, �'�'1:•lA. a i.X ,... f wr 1 .4•, 4 i v R E u ,zi,. ,6..,., eh 1 o to /dr I ,-/Dgfil /g• I "me—,-,—• %/f 7 /i ti czC I)4 I ,9 ,S� r i oRT y'�„c�;- �4'/NG D' Q 's 1#01) tkl k, 2,�os a � : 1 , -...f . r ; 1 �; W /al , , i P- ' . \i : ce \ j< C o t 1 0 , , -- , 4, 1 Q LI ___ ., r n „ i ,/ j r1 t e'? f R CEIVED �� ✓ CITY OF RENTO 1 i /SO an HEARING EXAMINER MAR 61979 ••••A 1 'W t AN HEARING 7,R,9,10,11,12,1,2,3i4,, ,6 oar Tn 9c r 2 ,..) 9 ? 4,14 /A C. 7k4cn A��?N'�`e�st. /c'g, VE r� .1 J Y!.�e CE a✓� " .S r,� " Q /2Kobt�/,E0 /N I/,c,�✓�rig 38, PAGF 3v Of /2[17 TC 6; 4 ;Y,; a*. ;,% •A•, J. .✓C�X �2>13' .P6�7'v� `t//q. 9 ?.�5- - / 15 0� 1No Cc. 14/4.sN.t Less nfi Naygo4 `2 : ;, , O , /4? 6 d rife rt 404" 77-to W&ST i 2ra iTEe r A5 f....-0 i : ,.1.,: ,1.112/271a-i 7z, ,,-.2 ,i, p iii,,K.7,144444 7Z,Icrz-, ��s 424 ci �cf; ' ' /C2AA-✓ &i 6 Z i v�''.�'G n 9 4/6454, i.) 46 he ,vogor'i 40 Cam' ��F4giaaecl+�� /g00 / Ail. �4E. 41E lef 'T�'a11. lwA w. rT EXHIBIT ' i`: =79 ( ,. 4-to �• /"-So , I 79004 4 ITEM NO- ��.-�e z- 7 2____ BEGINNING OF FILE Tt 1 3077° IC ' I FIL ED OF R4,41 4 t0$ ® 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • DELORES A. MEAD co• CITY CLERK 09grFD SEPTc_O • November 2, 1979 Fran Briere 1800 Duvall Ave. NE Renton, WA 98055 \Re: Recorded documents Fran Briers. Short Plat 307 79 . Dear Sir: Enclosed please find your copy of the document (s) recorded with King County Records and on file with the City Clerk's Office of Renton. Very truly yours CITY OF RENTON . Delores A. Mead City Clerk DAM/db; s t Enc ( 1 ) ' - nJ DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COV[N/UWb^ � Uj. � oz WHEREAS, J. nz�ere an u�o w��e^ �arcezaue S. ariore, . . c� ru ` ~o ^ ^ co ' r~ ___----- — --- ` �'`o the o�n�rs of the follxwihg r^ul property in the Ci of nevtuv, r^ . ` � m � o County of :in , Sate of-was'h1.ngton, described as Exhibit 'A' attachedheretu. ' 'r WHEREAS, the owner(s) of said de I re scribed propert� des to impuse the *folluwinq restrictive covenants running with the lJnd as e � a f t re above described real property. to use, ores n an u v , f h o the x uv e� `NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish, . ' . grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land . ` hnrejnahove des cribeuwith respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs , And assigns as follows : INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVE M[NTS � The owner(s) of tHe 'above described property, their suc- reusors , heirs and assigns , hereby agree and coven-ant to ' Participate in , sign a petition in supoort of, and accept ' any future Lojcal [mprnvement District (LID) or city ivitia- ' . ted proposal , and pay their fair share therefore-, for the ` purposes of prnvi6inDthe necessary off-site improvements requiredby the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improve— ments shall incl`ude out may got be limited to the installa- tion "f curbs , y"tter� , sidewalksi -street paving, sanitary ' sewers , storm sewers ^ ,undvrgroun6ing of utilities , and straet ]ighting, These covenants are imposed in lied of Section 9-1105(6) of Title2K of Ordinance #1628nf the City of Rontnn . ' , 3r VOL �«^ �� a� ~~� "°'^,= . ' ' ' � ��_ �� /� ��r� ' z�VlA1�� ». , ^~~~ ^~~ , `~ . ' . \ ' • DURATION These covenants shall .run with the land and, expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are • installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of • o the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- 0 meats as required by, the Ordinances of the City of Renton CNI shall terminate without. necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by' proper legal procedures in the Superior' Court of King County, by either the City of Renton or any property' owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. 11.4../C-6,1:five,',Gi (�C �;CA.r �K.t,tiv— o �Francis J. �iere Mlane S. Briere f STATE OF WASHINGTON) ' COUNTY OF KING ) • On this - day of , 19 `c, , before me personally appeared �<<�.,� :�. �:,� � ..� �,,,\ <<<<1..,1C 7 the. person(s) who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and .voluntary act and deed of said persons) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. • Notary, Public in and for the State of Washington, residing .at (!,,,,,< 01., LILLD for Record at Request of INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ' 1 TO: Bill Torohoff 6/7/79 • FROM: Dee Renton City Clerk ' s Office SUBJECT: Recording of Sho Plat 307-79 Dear Bill , Enclosed please find check for $10. 00 to record the Short Plat that I brought in on Thursday of last week. The mylar is in the Assessor' s Office. i . Thanx, Yk • • OF RA, A �0 o THE CITY OF RENTON ,r Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 0,9gTFD SEP�00 MEMORANDUM May 23, 1979 TO: City Clerk FROM: Planning Department RE: FRAN BRIERE SHORT PLAT Forwarded herewith for your recording with King County are the mylar for the subject short plat and original copy of restrictive covenants regarding off-site improvements. Please note that the recording fees have been paid by Mr. Briere. Thank you. wr Attachments OF R4,� ,y : 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 rn " CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER oho am. L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 •94, SEPSE�� April 24, 1979 Mr. Francis J. Briere 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79, W-309-79; Francis J. Briere. Dear Mr. Briere: This is to notify you that the above referenced requests, which were approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the Examiner's report of April 9, 1979, have not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is considered final and is being submitted to the City Clerk effective this date for permanent filing. Restrictive covenants will be filed by the City Clerk with King County. Please, contact the Planning Department (235-2550) for information regarding preparation of the final short plat mylar for filing with King County. Sincerely, ,�, s• L. Rick, Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Francis J. Briere and his wife, Marcelane S. Briere are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton , County of King, State of Washington , described as Exhibit 'A' attached hereto. WHEREAS , the owner(s) of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owner(s) hereby establish , grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs , and assigns as follows: INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS The owner(s) of th.e above described property, their suc- cessors , heirs and assigns ; hereby agree and covenant to participate in , sign a petition in support of, and accept any future Local Improvement District (LID) or city initia- ted proposal , and pay their fair share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-site improvements required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. Said improve- ments shall include but may not be limited to the installa- tion of curbs , gutters , sidewalks , street paving, sanitary sewers , storm sewers , undergrounding of utilities , and street lighting. These covenants are imposed in lieu of Section 9-1105(6) of Title IX of Ordinance #1628 of the City of Renton. 1110 DURATION These .covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improve- ments as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the. Superior• Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining • subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. • � 1J er A, Francis J. �iere Ma celane S. Briere • STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this � day of , 19 , before me personally appeared , • the person(s) who executed the 'within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said person(s) for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at \',,-,\0,., AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 9th day of April , 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this dayof 197c\ . Notary Public in and for the State '- . - of Washington, residing 'at:P,en; `on: .1 Application, Petition or Case: Francis J. Briere; Sh. Pl. 307-79 (The minutes contain a £L t o6 the panties necond) 7niffig& _ *-23e7p-i-zbg ;--v A 777' i2?2/7 i 7/7 ro (7-r2-7 (-7‘, 7?- rp-?2- --r,71-4,12-v-r ri74 izA7t - W h 4 • April 9, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER • CITY OF RENTON • REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION . APPLICANT: Francis J. Briere FILE NO. Short Plat 307-79 E-308-79, W-309-79 • LOCATION: Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests, approval of a three-lot short plat, an exception to the Subdivision, Ordinance to permit two 25-foot pipestem roads, and request for waiver of the required off-site improvements. • SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval subject to restrictive covenants. • Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of short plat and waiver subject to restrictive covenants; denial of exception. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The• Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 1, 1979. • PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and • field checking the property and surrounding area, the • Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: - • The hearing was opened on March 6, 1979 at 9:50 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. • Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the.Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, . Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1; and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Letter to Planning Department from Kenneth J. • Oyler, dated February 9, 1979, regarding request for exception and waiver. • •Exhibit #3: Short Plat Map as submitted Exhibit #4: Short Plat Map with staff comments Mr. Clemens added two recommendations to the existing conditions contained in Exhibit #1 consisting of dedication of 20 feet for future right-of-way on Duvall Avenue N.E. and approval of the short plat be contingent upon rezone of the property (File No. R-306-79, public hearing this date) . The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Francis J. Briere 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. • Renton, WA 98055 • • Mr. Briere requested clarification. of the requirement for dedication. of 20 feet of right- Of-way on Duvall Avenue N.E. designated on Exhibit #4. •Mr. Clemens explained the proposal for dedication of an additional 20 feet on both sides of Duvall Avenue, N.E. to provide for future widening of that roadway if determined necessary. Mr. Briere inquired if compensation would be made' for such dedication, noting that other residents had not been required to provide .similar dedication. Mr. Clemens indicated that approval of the proposed development would require provision of right-of-way as well as installation of appropriate off-site improvements. The Examiner advised that the possibility of acquiring compensation had not been precluded, but would be the option of the applicant. Mr. Briere requested additional time •to review the requirement of dedication since it had not been included in the Planning Department recommendation, although it had appeared in staff comments attached to the report. . 14 Short Plat 307-79 Page Two The Examiner subsequently continued the hearing until 9:00 a.m. in March 13, 1979. He then entered the following exhibit into the record: Exhibit #5: Affidavit of Ownership The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 was closed at 10:03 a.m. and continued to March 13, 1979. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was reopened on March 13, 1979 at 9:12 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Mr. Clemens advised that he had received a request for additional review period from the applicant, and suggested that the public hearing be continued until 9:00 a.m. on April 3, 1979. The hearing was subsequently closed at 9:15 a.m. by the Examiner and continued to 9:00 a.m. on April 3, 1979. CONTINUANCE: The hearing was reopened on April 3, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the • Renton Municipal Building. The Examiner noted that although neither the applicant nor his representative was in attendance, the hearing would proceed as scheduled since the applicant had specifically requested the continuance, and had been notified of the hearing date and time.. Mr. Clemens advised his understanding from discussion with the applicant's attorney that it was the intention of the applicant to proceed with the short plat application as submitted. The Examiner requested additional comments or new information from Mr. Clemens. Mr. Clemens entered the following exhibit into the record: Exhibit #6: King County Assessor's Map designating subject site and surrounding area Mr. Clemens designated on Exhibit #6 the location of the proposed right-of-way line on Duvall Avenue N.E. established by King County prior to annexation of the area into the city. He advised that the existing 60-foot right-of-way, proposed to be widened to 100 feet, would require a 20-foot dedication by the applicant on the easterly side of Duvall Avenue N.E. The Examiner requested a representative of the Public Works Department to respond to the subject of whether or not off-site improvements should be required as a condition of approval of the request in view of a recent legal opinion from the City Attorney that such improvements must be justified by reason of public health, safety and welfare. Responding was: Paul Lumbert Traffic Engineering Division Public Works Department Mr. Lumbert indicated that although off-site improvements currently do not exist along Duvall Avenue N.E. , provision of sidewalks would be desirable to accommodate pedestrians of school age utilizing the route to neighboring schools. He advised that open ditch drainage currently existing along the side of the roadway appears to be adequate and installation of pipe or update of the drainage facility would not be necessary at the present time. The Examiner requested clarification that only sidewalks and not other off-site improvements would be required at this time. Mr. Lumbert responded affirmatively. Mr. Clemens indicated concurrence with the analysis of the Public Works Department due to marginal justification of off-site improvements. However, he noted that at some future time when full improvements of Duvall Avenue N.E. to right-of-way standards occur, improvements should include installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving, street lighting and drainage. Mr. Clemens indicated that requirement of full improvements for the subject request should be deferred until such time as a larger development is proposed or a local improvement district formed, but the applicant should agree to participate in the project by signing restrictive covenants. Referencing Exhibit #4, the Examiner inquired if an existing storage shed located six feet from the northerly property line in Parcel 2 is in conformance with existing setback requirements. Mr. Clemens advised that the SR-1 zone requires a five-foot sideyard setback for one-story structures; therefore, the existing shed complies with ordinance requirements. The Examiner inquired if the location of the existing residence conforms to setback requirements in view of the required street dedication on Duvall Avenue N.E. Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The Examiner recalled existence of an additional Short Plat 307-79 Page Three storage shed within Parcel 1, not designated on Exhibit #4, and inquired if it would be removed. Although Mr. Clemens could not specifically respond to the inquiry, he felt that compliance with Exhibit #4 was intended by the applicant, and therefore, the structure would probably be removed. The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. Mr. Clemens indicated the recommendation contained in Exhibit #1 would remain as submitted. The Examiner requested that the applicant be contacted by the Planning Department and requested to submit written comments no later than Friday morning, April 6, 1979. Mr. Clemens indicated that the applicant will be so notified. • The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79, and W-309-79 was closed by the Examiner at 9:25 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a three-lot short plat, an exception for two pipestem lots and a waiver of off-site improvements. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , the subject proposal is exempt from the threshold determination and EIS requirements of SEPA. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. . 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity except that sanitary sewer is located 1,000 feet north of the site. 7. The proposal is compatible with the setback and lot area and dimension requirements of Section 4-704 (SR-1) of Title IV, and Section 9-1108.23 (Subdivision Ordinance - Minimum Standards for Residential Design) , Title IX, Ordinance No. .1628, Code of General Ordinances; except for Pipestem Lots 1 and 2 (Section 9-1108.23.F. (3) . (d) . 8. With the exception of an affidavit of ownership (Exhibit #5) certification per Section 9-1106.3.H has not been completed. 9. Off-site improvements do not exist in the reasonable vicinity of the property and have been requested by the applicant to be waived. 10. Restrictive covenants were not submitted (Section 9-1105.3.B) . 11. Staff and Exhibit #4 indicated that for some time dedication of additional right-of-way along Duvall Avenue N.E. has been planned. Twenty feet was recommended for dedication of the applicant's property. The dedication produces no conflict with building setback regulations of Section 4-704 (SR-1) . 12. The existing storage shed located on Lot 2 conforms to the building setback regulations of Section 4-704 (SR-1) . It is unknown if the existing storage.building on Lot 1 also conforms to these regulations. 13. Per Exhibit #4 sufficient property frontage exists along Duvall Avenue N.E. for dedication of a public road (50-foot right-of-way) into the property while apparently conforming to building setback regulations for the existing home on Lot 3. Pavement of approximately 20-25 feet in width apparently exists within what will be the pipestem area. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposal as herein decided appears to conform to the Comprehensive Plan, zoning regulations and Subdivision Ordinance and protects the ". . .public health, safety, welfare and aesthetics. . ." (Section 9-1101.2).. 2. Certification per Section 9-1106.3.H. can be completed per staff review and approval Short Plat 307-79 Page Four prior to, at or immediately following filing of the final plat with King County. 3. The amount of property frontage along Duvall Avenue N.E. is insufficient to permit more than a single lot width. However, this frontage is sufficient to permit one lot width and the normal 50-foot wide dedicated public street without reducing the proposed density of the short plat or ,potential development of the remainder of the property. It appears that "undue hardship" does not exist for the applicant to dedicate the right-of-way in lieu of two pipestems to serve the large lots of Lot 1 and 2 (Section 9-1109.1) . The "physical circumstances" that exist and dedication of the right-of-way do not appear to ". . .deprive the applicant of the reasonable use or development of his land;" (Section 9-1109.1.A) . Development of a three-lot short plat will be unaffected, in terms of design and potential density, by the dedication in compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance. It has not been claimed or substantiated that the dedication would interfere with the applicant's "rights and privileges" (Section 9-1109.1.B) . Injury to other properties or the public welfare is not apparent as a result of the pipestems or dedication. Recognizable is the monetary impact of improvements to this dedicated public street. However, this impact is greatly reduced by the existing 20-25 feet of pavement in apparently the street and pipestem areas. This amount of paving is unusual in the area and has not been witnessed in short plat applications before the Examiner in the past two years. It seems that the substantial amount of off-site improvements to the right-of-way have been completed previously. The issue then becomes a waiver of these improvements. 4. The public notice in the file of record does not specify which' street(s) for which a waiver of off-site improvements was requested by the applicant. Testimony in the public hearing addressed improvements along Duvall Avenue N.E. exclusively. However, it appears reasonable that the waiver of improvements within this new dedicated street can be included in the application and can be acted upon by the Examiner. Since driveway access of Lot 3 fronts on the new right-of-way, a total of three lots will utilize this new street and the existing pavement. This density does not appear to necessitate full improvements, which would seem to inflict "undue hardship" upon the applicant (Section 9-1109.1) . For such a low density full improvements would appear to severely reduce the short plat potential which is a ". . .reasonable use or development of his land; " (Section 9-1109.1.A) . A waiver will preserve the "Rights and privileges" of the applicant (Section 9-1109.1.B) . Detriment to the public welfare and other properties is not evident (Section 9-1109.1.C) . What improvements are necessary beyond paving at this time is uncertain for the public health, safety and welfare. On this basis, it appears appropriate to waive off-site improvements. However, due to the ultimate potential development of Lots 1 and 2 by further subdivision, the waiver should be conditioned upon completion of restrictive covenants agreeing to participate in an LID for these off-site improvements if required by the city or as a result of further subdivision of Lots 1 and 2. 5. Relative to off-site improvements along Duvall Avenue N.E., the absence of these improvements in the immediate vicinity strongly suggests that the improvements should be waived (Section 9-1105.6.B) . Testimony indicated that sidewalks would be necessary for public health, safety and welfare because a public school is located northwest of the site. However, this would appear to more strongly suggest that sidewalks are necessary along the west side of Duvall Avenue N.E. , not the east side (along the applicant's property) . Therefore, it appears that sufficient justification is lacking for requiring off-site improvements along Duvall Avenue N.E. 6. The reclassification decision approving SR-1 zoning on the property (R-306-79) to allow the proposed short plat has not been finally approved by the City Council. Pending this approval, the short plat can be approved. 7. Dedication of additional right-of-way for Duvall Avenue N.E. appears a tenuous request on the basis of the record. Insufficient evidence was submitted to weigh public benefit and the impact of this development to draw the conclusion that additional right-of-way along Duvall Avenue N.E. is necessary. The scale and intensity of the proposal does not appear to warrant additional right-of-way. DECISION: Approval of a short plat subject to: 1. Revision to Exhibit #3, submitted short plat, to include a 50-foot dedicated right- of-way along all. of Lot 3. 2. Approval of the reclassification to SR-1 (R-306-79) . • • Short Plat 307-79 Page Five 3. All existing structures and buildings conforming to applicable building setback regulations. . 4. Completion of certification per Section 9-1106.3.H. 5. Final approval of the final plat by the Planning and Public Works Department for conformance with this decision. • Approval of a waiver of improvements within the aforementioned 50-foot public right-of- way until such time as Lots 1 and 2 are further subdivided. Restrictive covenants are to be completed attesting to participation in 'an LID for installation of these improvements when required by the City of Renton and/or upon subdivision of Lots 1 or 2. Approval of a waiver of off-site improvements along Duvall Avenue N.E. since insufficient justification was provided for requiring these improvements which do not exist within a • reasonable distance (Section 9-1105.6.B) . Denial of the exception for two pipestem. lots. ORDERED THIS 9th day of April, 1979. • • • L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of April, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Francis J. Briere, 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 • TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of April, .1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti • Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Paul Lumbert, Traffic Engineering Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 23, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the • decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous,procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors.relied upon by such, appellant, and the Examiner may, after' review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. RECEIVE® CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING EXAMINER MAR 61979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER Am PA PUBLIC HEARING 'Z 181% ilt=E'ul e,` a te4 tK uk MARCH 6 1 l ;9 I- , IIBIT NO. APPLICANT: FRANCIS J . BRIERE ITEM NO. Pam- 7 75 FILE NUMBERS : R-306-79 , SHORT PLAT 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR- 1 and a proposed three-lot short plat . In order to allow such subdi - vision , the applicant is also requesting an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to permit two 25-foot pipestem roads . In addition , the application includes a request for waiver of the required off-site improvements . (Site development map attached . ) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1. Owner of Record : FRANCIS J . BRIERE 2 . Applicant : FRANCIS J . BRIERE 3. Location : Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave . N . E . (Vicinity map attached ) 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the -Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : ±3. 34 acres 6. Access : Via Duvall Avenue N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning "G" , General Classification District . ; 8. Existing Zoning in "G" , General Classification the Area : District; King County SR (Mininum lot size 7200 square feet with sewers ; 15 , 000 square feet without ) . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential . 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing' date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on February 23 , 1979, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordi - nance on February 22 , 1979. C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2945 dated July 17 , 1975. D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is generally level . 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium , and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops , and for urban development. • r . • . 4010 "• PLANNI'NG pEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER • PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH, 6 , 1979 PAGE .TWO 3 . Vegetation;: . °..Low, scrub, grass dominates the property with a dense'''stan'd 'of Douglas Fir Trees extending the length of the east boundary. Parts in the north portion have been cleared and graded . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suit- able habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land Use : An existing single family residence and a large shed are located in the southwest portion of the property. Another single family residence is located immediately north of the site . Additional single family dwellings are found to the south and west while the property immediately east remains largely undeveloped . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is composed principally of widely scattered single family residences . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An existing 12" water main extends north- south on the east side of Duvall adjacent to the subject site and a 3" main is located on th'e west side . An 8" sanitary sewer runs east-west on S . E . 101st Street approximately 1 , 000 feet north of the subject site . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Ave- nue N. E . approximately 3/4 of a mile to the southwest of the subject site . 4. Schools : Honeydew Elementary School is approximately one mile southwest of the subject site , and McKnight Middle School is within 1 3/4 miles to the west , while Hazen HIgh School is within one-half mile to the south . 5 . Recreation : Kiwanis Park is located approximately one mile to the southwest of the subject site and North Highlands Park is within 2 miles west. G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729, G , Residence Single Family. 2 . Section 4-704 , SR-1 , Residence Single Family. H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 ; Short Subdivisions . 2 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 . 66 ; Waived ' Improve- ments . 3 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1109; Exceptions . 4. Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report'; Objective 6 , P . 18 . I . IMPACTS ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Minor 41011 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6 , 1979 PAGE THREE 2 . Population/Employment : Minor 3 . Schools : Minor 4 . Social : Minor 5. Traffic : The proposed short plat will generate approximately 20 additional vehicle trips per day on Monroe Avenue N . E . This would increase traffic flow by less than 1% per day on this arterial . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , no determination of environmental significance is required for the short plat. However , a declaration of non-significant impact has been prepared for the rezoning due to its scope . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of' Renton Fire Department L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map element which designates the site arid general area as single family residential . . 2 . The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject site into three parcels . This will require the approval of a short plat by the Hearing Examiner'. In addition , exceptions for two pipestem roads and a request for waiver of off-site improvements will be required . . 3. The subject site has been zoned "G" since it was annexed in 1975 . Review of the Planning Department records does not indicate an areawide zoning review of the site since that time. 4 . The subject site is located on the east side of Duvall Avenue N . E . The land on the west side of Duvall within the City . is presently zoned "G". also . Some properties in King County on the west side of the street are zoned Suburban Residential with a minimum lot" size of 7200 square feet with sewers and 15 ,000 square feet without sewers . Portions of the properties have been subdivided into lots 9, 000 to 13 , 000 square feet . All properties - in the applicant ' s proposed short plat would. exceed 18 , 000 square feet . The proposed rezone to SR-1 appears consistent with the existing properties in the area and , therefore , appropriate for the site. . The Land Use Report , 1965 , advises : "Encourage the development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desir- ability as a place in which to work , shop , live , and play. " (Objective 6, p . 18 ) 5 . Suitable water supply is available to the subject site. However , the nearest sewer line is approximately 1/4 mile to the north of the site , and the Utilities Engineering Division advises that pumping would be required . 4011 1011 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79, Short Plat 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 6. All the departments reviewing this proposal indicate no objections other than the situation in #5 above . 7 . Analysis items 3 and 4 appear to comply with Section 4-3014 , thus substantiating the proposed rezone . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENATIONS : Approval of the requested rezone from "G" to " SR- 1" based on the compatibility of the proposed use with the existing uses and that the site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review. . N . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ( SHORT PLAT ) : 1. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan , which designates the site and surrounding area as single family residential . 2 . The proposal is compatible with adjacent single family residential uses and similar patterns in the area . ' 3. The size of the existing property is large enough that the proposed short plat is a reasonable use of the land . Proposed Lot #1 is approximately 21 , 605 square feet , and Lot #2 is approximately 105 ,460 square feet. Lot #3 with the existing residence is approximately 18 ,496 square feet. 4 . Although the lots of the proposed short plat do exceed the minimum lot size requirement of the SR-1 zone and the Subdivision Ordinance , the amount of frontage on Duvall Avenue N. E. is not sufficient to meet the 75 foot standard for each lot. The applicant is therefore proposing Lot #3 with a 125-foot frontage with Lots #1 and #2 designed as pipestem lots with 25-foot frontages and 125 foot and 145 foot pipestem lengths respectively. 5 . The parcel immediately west and north of proposed Lot #1 is separate and apart from the subject site and contains frontage on Duvall Avenue N . E . Because of this location , proposed Lots #1 and #2 cannot meet the frontage require- ment of the SR- 1 zone . It would seem, therefore , that reasonable justification can be provided for the exception as proposed in #4 above . (Section 9-1109. 1A) 6 . The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advises that if and when Lot #2 is developed , the additional 25 feet of right-of-way in Lot #1 will have to be acquired to provide for a full 50-foot wide street with improvements . 7 . At this time off-site improvements along Duvall Avenue N . E. are very limited . Therefore , deferring improvements until ' a future time appears warranted . Thus , the waiver of off- site improvements subject to restrictive covenants providing for future LID participation appears satisfactory . 8 . At such time as Parcel #2 is further developed by a street extension , area-wide circulation can be addressed to insure access , if required , to the east of this parcel . 9 . At the time of this report preparation , we have received no written comments from outside departments . I_l • 4101 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6, 1979 PAGE FIVE 0 . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval of the short plat and proposed exception for the pipestem lot , subject to the following conditions : 1 . Final Public Works Department approval of storm drainage plans . 2. Payment of standard fees as per Utilities Engineering Division comments . Waive off-site improvements subject to provision of restrictive covenants providing for future LID participation for improve- ments to Duvall Avenue N .E . b - - Ay RFN T ' s°prr ( FEB 9 191E NAirIN4 1 . /�v? /ntCGilllCf �� 9� .��.' -- t, t• - rN SNvRT n'c- -NING Q.� . 16 QJ W J / • gggg��`� • ' .4 ' 2/GOj Q. )h Ci • R M724- - 'M.., „. . Ikli . . NI K n t1 . Q o 3 1 �� u t s1 . 1 i Old ...- . . ti 414 • f.4 1 • • .-YO,12DE'9/I✓ {/.7Gu!-!& ?5, J4C•E ,3!� Gr ii✓ 9 ii+ _ _ _ - - -- ECCI�✓:, OF eNC CC.L�i/4.5•,ki, .�3 i!!C I-r:47I4 4/-,f f - - ,/! ' /a,:9' FED:,�"c�•-'-- Tra r✓esr /2•./; l=ear "1s l` \^-'' • ` . - -_ ` A,�t_•✓ ) AegiJ.S -it %./C.iti.:n UIr 6. .YN=.. • I J _ 'e`. ^J f! i/ ._. f . , in..• ____---______. 1 . • •. . . . ' ;t.., • ' .. . _ ..---•• _..........--_ ......_ , ,1,4 . _..... . .. •. ,,,.-„,, 04 t,„,,,,,t, ,! .. . ..___ . .. :711 •. _ -...— . -- ________... __ • _._... . ''''4\44:04itl, I " • .4.,,1,0 .11.1:. v •,41-„ i • , . . 44./ v '''*•,,.-). i 0 ' \ . .. •,,.. ':(1;,,, s'Itt • • -,. kp,,,e,-.4„..., 4.•ta , • N,;47.1votilk,lil.t• • • , - "Nli,„1.? v • . . . , • , .47 el •• .•,W ••,,,•-.. •. r.if iptiiilY.V0,,4 •••-•.4''.:414:.. 4'14' °.64.• 4 i.4.-W.,,,i,,,,,e1.il,„. ',Zil',‘ . '' . P.3* ;•:ft:-. . . ' •._ . .. „,, I . ..... . __ - -- - ,.----------- _ ___-- mto I .4. • • ,,, .,,,,, • -ki„ . IA tir5 • I - , . Yr:-= . ' 'iv Y ' .• . MT .. . pl.. IA' 1 • ' . I •-: .•.. .. $ t,:t .ii; .4t.,,,,•2',.; ..,,, A.:„; .4,, • -, - --• •------ ----- ,,.. ... -••- 4,,,. , vtu• . . , i. •ti, •44, -., ;'',I,'I.''.' ,'4.•••'''AN, 014 '• Ig4;,. to "•,1, . Dilti3ltnit141.0*, 4,,,,,!--1-g• ;4' '''''V to . ' L'ita: ,',A,. : .1',.,. 0 tfi ',Aft- ;--t; ?4,,,,• .• ;,,,,f . ' ,n,i,„; • ,m,, ,; itl. ,.,.. • -.1- .•--4.-•, i?1 41, . i ' . • '`.•,$*' • ,,,: / I .• . ..1,, ...., . . . - • ,,,, 't4„„,, . . ,4.4.,,•.1, . • i '4...,, ' el . . • 4 I. , .. ,• . . •• . • . • • •• ,.. • .'. . • • f• k \ . , . • . .. .. ...•. . . • t .$4%_,...e.,-;,,t,,w,•,..,..-0.00-riair...,,-..-.„..-:.-4,',,A,Au04...A.3.4.1010,;,,,,,, ..-ii- .,, , •-r1 p . , ,,. . " .. . —. --lit ' • , t _L 1 .,„..4,,,r. I - --- -. ; . -•,!, - •I --—7-.---- . ''.,,r, '..r. ...; ,„.• t r • t. , - 144 t •;,,,,/. 0 F; ••,.I- 1 t`r•..4, -.N.\ .. 0 ,,:, ir.... . ,,,,,..• .. . , Jr ,.ie.-..,i.o., l'''4zNliq N, ' • 61.4. 3/1; 1/4" ' it 4'I '4 t: . . . .7.:.,,,,W'''; '! u.Atii? ..) ! 4 $( 'i „... i • i'4,.'1,4 4-"' ;Ar. ,..; WI - ' ' . )1 $ I • 'Xhr,.. t •fr rf 1 . ozw,m,,,,Aintyyx.N;,;., ;.,:l i.,;:lp.,,,•*,4, . . i /./ 4, ii ,,,i' ‘,'''' :,,,X210' / • , . 1,,, • I'. ' :41 j a . . "• f, IT , ,"?.•;,,, .4,,,,,,,,,,,,04 t' ''''.'; Skit , ; , ,44 . • ' ' ,,Ilp..",* ,41„ .4.,4 t .47,t-t1/4„41.......', ,e1/4. ..,,,,..•, !it-, 047 l't.' •• ..„.,0 .,..F., .i,, / ,. *.1. / • i..1,,, , / if, k...- , i 1 I. •"•,,.. i:`,.' . _.----. VI'?e4'4444244- ../ . 7 ori4 '44 - v., . )• *,..--,„..,. -eh., . , 1,, 4.e. . ' ....4t),* • ----• .-----.._ 2`•V 7g' !) k. '• •)41, • • 1..,, ; '''Fa‘ii.,,, . . • r i',71,• 'ttit, -41, 74:717131'4'1417°:441;11:071:f,,1/4,th..'-', i‘':-'4:::11 • ' '• . -. . • . . i. • . ,.„ i 4 • ---rtir ,k . . , i• 4 ., 1 a I 4,0 ,. . • - ----.#,,i, • A se ) Att,e/ . • . ',... eol • ;:;-:':,,, '141 ta _ ‘,..1.',,,. 1 ..; . . . ' .. .-------- WIC'Va it 40.4—'14141'-,-;...4.1.:;.1*-?;42-14;P;•,. 44) _ . ' . . . - ---- ‘ .....;.- . • .0.4---- t 101., '"1 -:.t;;, ;t / . • • . . _ - . .. . If 4 4' ,..4,v1 . .4. 1 . .or A; • I ' ..‘. .\ ' •,:o . .0; to. ;yA _,.. - , .•,•-• „I. . • 1 ..;- - i ',.. , • \ , 4,01 14 4 k . ,,,,.., .1,fio• f 'wit' . 't; --- -_,--S'',.:11:1:::...'... 4., - ....!.:1;,..0,,. / . . . i" 'I • i 1..: - , ,----— • • . • ' 4 ..44.. . 4'.'' •$. ‘1., "ii$ 6 % „---- • , ,N.N+ 45 '4 • . _ ,... . •,O• 1 . "'s 1." i ,-.,,,pri . 4 . • 11; 0,,e4A bP a 11 . , A. I " 1_oe, ;...„. 44' c ir.,41 -,-----11.. : -4 7 16) ; , ..) . , . ...... . . . . 01110 OD • ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPa Department 0 Police Department Public Wor-k-s Department 0 Building Div. Engineering' Div . (Please verify legal descriptic 0 Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his •isignee ) a l </// � X, DATE : 0//iY l� PLEA E REVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 4 ,'.. ///e1,,e LOCATION : /ga9 "t:// lig ✓" A! APPLICATION ( S ) : g of '/ 79 , a,,,c.-/ , td7(61i26-79 a e*//' ihde,1-- aef ,,,,-- IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : g 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : j1 Approved I tjot Appr v d Comments or conditions : -- �--e`) G-Lc„,,- fie 9,4_,, ecteey—____. 3 - z �'' `' 6-&-Y,--z-,— .-X },--t- i "1:L., , ,...'e,.. a5,1L-(,),..."-L. t2_ 3- . ? y ,, . ,,,c'--4- 4-, 6,,,,a;t-----(_ (,)-, - A-:--- 2- 4t- .-'-d' s--4- r._j.,,,:e_.. .1 ,.,,± Fi t,,j73 c,"-- cl's-t-dird. ..4,,,,-- , p i c„-74,- a,a(d,;ze o,_../ Zvte ei Jo. ,A.vkt_.// A/e, A/,5. (.--- ----- 4.--- d 2-i/ 7 7 Signature of Director or Authorized R presentative Date S. 410 • ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department Public - orks Department 0 Building Div . 0 Engineering" Div (Please verify legal descriptic OTraffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Departments ( signed by responsible official or his signee )APV o DATE : �� ®d�9 PLEA E REVIEW T,9HII�S/!/lJAPPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : °'� f nl rr � /Y' / e/e �� .� LOCATION : / # . 42'?// // APPLICATION(S) : 0 AW ®79 ie/;' . ee,M6 /06-19 0 e 61/"/ eddefr ' IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : el, �� . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ZZ.-1D6,--- d Approved Not Approve Comments or conditions : • • ( -----#C.- ar, ,..e-As.2,-- Z.,---2c) ----? (9. .. L Signature . ector or Aut, rized Representative Date 411110 S. . -NI ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department Public Works Department 0 Building Div . Engineering Div'. ( Please verify legal descriptic CK/ Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his • sig®nee ) r f a a /( DATE : "i/d/79 PLEA E REVIEW T/ IS APPLICATION FOR : a APPLICANT : -e �/ LOCATION : /I/0 . Meg kA/ c / APPLICATION ( S) : / /t ,7-79 ` ` ). ` ' . 4aet 0-79 o a £,, e IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : - 'Z 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ``� Department : / / 4 F /C-' b AiG /ACE _ ram' ( N G Approved Li Not Approved Comments or conditions : _c- zz Signature of Director or uthorized Repr entative Date fh. 010 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : F�inance Department C " Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ® Public Works Department O Building Div . 0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description rm o &r'affic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his signee ) aG6/1/."'(/) c �� DATE : 6/1 PLEA, E REVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : //,4 neifze LOCATION : A52,e2 â'm// %s /1 / APPLICATION(S) : c7/1�1 / � / � � 6 4/ i&orict fao--# dooe,/ ii‘defr /./,Aeav IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN . RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : Igl 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : fief' Ell/Approved LI Not Approved 6,x2 /7'S'roitf Comments or conditions : ,ef ,�,,e /ts it.44.7fe /4vS-'/tat)7 i u4..1 ,S /em u.,e>cra i3 /1-Ccer3 T-r24v—/t%v K�-r� ,�2 .piece 't—G 7 % u /9-tiD,�� y yi�2 J/,y/rc/ <? /�S�17-4 Ge'a / -i3 /7. '% /1M /- )//t-' C`J/4Ze/ l7 ,YL 1. /L-7/r i S'/tO/Gt &r (g2-/oZ f' ' ii &'je Se -2 72 /7 5 Signature of Directo or Aut orized Rep esentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U""T"s w Approved 11 Not Approved Comments or conditions : (Y 3ULl iJ ✓/1 7-6//11iJ -2 26' 77 Signatulhe of Director or Authorized Representative Date V 4INI, ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS • TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department `Police Department Public Works Department • Wilding Div . 0 Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his design /V) e gz6vais ,e/479 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : af# ,Of iterd/ Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1 ! SIGNIFICANT JON SIG I ICANT Comments : 2_7/2-// 77 Signature of Director or Authorize Represeratat ' ve Date 410 010 . • ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: 0 Finance Department III Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Wo ks Department 0- Building Div . 40 Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his design lit/ ////2 e , ,,w,,,,-= /,, ,9 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : : ' ALAV,./ , : , aele ,�'� cif.-. /47 4/4/ o mor Please review the atta ched . Review requested by (date ) : C�i// Note : Responses to be written An ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (8e.----Th 6. I ! SIGNIFICANT I INON SIGNIFICANT Comments : c 'C'c cs1-4-'�' -�� ,� r, C C,0,,,e -- Date / Signature ,-Director or Authorized Representative 0411) . ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department 8 • Fire Department Library Department 8 Park Department Police Department • ® Public Works Department 8 Building Div . E ii'neering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designe 4/2 . ,eill'4 -' Z /j 29 c SUBJECT: Review of ECF- Application No . : �� eve/Action Name : . 1.''�'' ) - Q1d.' j 1//' `/:I Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : l, ,o- G ,E /v J//�•L=1T-416 ! SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT Comments : , ITC:41--0-2,4--/- z5Z.A.A..-- v2-. 0 /i Signature of Director o "ut orized Repres tative Date r .. OP OD ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS • TO: Finance Department 0 • Fire Department 40 Library Department 40 Park Department 40 Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Engineering Div . +\, raffic Engineering Div . `- G - Utilities Engineering Div . FROM:. Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his design e e /of (, ,, ` ,/p e gzolie, SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : ,01 44��y 4, e011e 60: Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : ..,-, 19 Note : Responses to be written in ink .• s REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment : igC SIGNIFICANT l- I NON SIGNIFICANT /, // ' i Comments :_ ie&,,,i,� AS .l'a' f77..�" Gr/' ' �i/l2i 4-M;11.) J'i&,F 4-ci1O /,vs'irr�/r O.L 4 s ea---a, /,,- o , y i_f2 cam- ecc—,,e,---.-c /dc-2 Lc-/%/l %�i AC/—/1i -14.i0 %c/%'_ C/"f(ff7"--C-�-G7✓t''y 'u/ it--t /e,c'1' ?c"/2 67=7, ,-*€ i"S A-,c,0 f7 /1-1/47,02 LS 5/V7)- 6_ , - /x-S�-ru— 10 ,e4� -i i.---1-/2 iej. au S ld / y- a ci i G.0i tiC Cy.,S�,2e-a2�.-iv• /`I/�-/rV S/•//9u= 4/6 e 'A rr,� ,t/u2%// 0/Z Sate i�f (l 1) �� r� 2 7-_-,:_7,, /-2-? Signature of Director or Authorized Represent ive Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : L1T'aic1 icl'i. l� SIGNIFICANT Li NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : ta15 �0.57N5iJ,-.( wr�_. 2c`Qu2 " AC✓4Ti 2r4r„( ES' . iI. / C: Fug_ �"_t- _Ji4 Cr( APPLL�.1 ('U.2 , NIL) 56,-162 5c:c'JCo A✓A,,-4,,LC7 AT air 5' 7-,--7C /1 t) 0 .7/g6/77 Signatu e of Director or Authorized Representative `• Date PROPOSED/FINA I..ARATION OF SIGNIFICAN —SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-306-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-434-79 El FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant requests approval of a rezone from "G", General Classification District, to "SR-1" , Single Family Residential . Proponent FRANCTS i BRIFRF Location of Proposal Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. Lead Agency RFNTON PlANNTNG DEPARTMFNT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ®x not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ® x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of /environmental significance : This declaration has been issued for rezoning only based on the compatibility of the proposed use with the existing uses and that the site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non- significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planni g D ''ecto Date February 27 , 1979 Signature �. City of Renton Planning Department 5 -76 I/ Cap rrs li/f C'i\ KENNETH J. OYLER CIVIL'ENGINEER & LAND SURVEYOR II r' �+ io�`; I� P.O.Box 2258 Renton,Wa 98055 255-5050 \._ ' %i! Feb. 9, 1979 \\ < ;/ AR'" Renton Planning Commission Renton, Wrash, Ref: Fran Briere Short plat 7 - 7, Gentleman: In order to shore, plat this tract it is necessary to provide access to Duval Ave. N.B. by pipe-stems. This will require ex- ceptions to the short plat requirements. These pipe-stems will be 25 feet in width and in the future can be incorporated in a 50 foot street if and when the retraining portion of the tract is platted. A waiver of the off-site improvements is also requested for this short plat as there are no similarnimprovements in the immediate area. Kenneth . y r 3 ur ue p aGg-qI RECEIVED VV 3d CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER MAR 61979 AM PM 71819110111;1211121314,5,6 EXHIBIT V o ITEM NO. qD 7— 7 9 _. ' • pF RFN�. :`1 Ontb �� AFFIDAVIT v • FEB 9 191 • 1\.06 ................... 4,� I, FRANSIS J. BRIERE , being duly swore ? e that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 1St day of Febsiary , 19 79 , Notary Public in and for the State of • • Washington, residing at Renton . Name of Notary Public) ignature o w 4033 NE, Sunset'B Tvd. •'*enton, '%'Wn. `58055 `'` , .' ' 0 .j)U' v '9' L — Si,'PI V 2 (Address) A( dre'ss)' RECEIVE® Dom" CITY'. OF RENTONr" ` �' fiJ fs, j g ,, Sate',`BEARING EXAMINER . , . ,.(City) (' ) MAR 61979 AM PM 718e9EI011le12e112e3141516 � --__C—.- ,;Jr-C, 0 , ..(Telephone) v l�. v • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) • CERTIFICATION , •:',,,'. • 1 ' ' , This is to certify that the foregoing application has been; .'i'nspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received ., •, '19 B•y:. . . TEM Na ,10 f� �D 7 7 �7 • Renton Planning Dept . �/�h / 2=73 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER rNTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON APRIL 3 , 1979 , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: Flo FRANCIS J . BRIERE , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO SR- 1 , File R-306-79 ; property located in the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N. E . 20 THE AUSTIN COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN H-1 ZONE , File SP-320-79 ; property located between East Valley Road and Lind Avenue on the south side of S .W. 16th Ave. So. to proposed S .W. 19th Street. 3. HOLMES ELECTRIC , APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT AN OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN M-P ZONE , File, SA-322-79 ; property located at 1500 Raymond Ave. S .W. • • Applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 3 , 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED March 23 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION . I , DAVID R. CLEMENS , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn • to before me, a Notary Public , • on the 21st day of March 19 79 SIGNED 1/4/21 C1Ty� 0�. s CITY OF RENTON z tg �+ Z SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE N "`; W, MAJOR PLAT DATE RE l/ TENTATIVE APPLICATIO T / fJ ' A;11:i00,0 0 7i/_S�•G�0 PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL FINAL REVIEW FEE $ �-�zb1)RECEIPT NO. F//f SM NO. PUD NO. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : 1. Plat Name & Location F 4ae /YR2/e45 fir PC4r / X)( w4 , .4V , 2 . No. Lots g Total Acreage 6, 41A Zoning 3 . Owner f //2i E Phone 2 c StO5 Address / 1v D vA/,mot Ava. /.1A. 5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed Telephone ( ) ( o) ( ) Electric ( ) ( r) ( ) Street Lights ( ) ( sr) ( ) Natural Gas ( o ) ( ) ( ) TV 'Cable ( ) ( •"1 ( ) 6 . Sanitation & Water: ( V) City Water ( ) ,Sanitary Sewers ( ) Water District No . ( ) Dry Sewers ( i`) Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION: TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED APPEALED EXPIRED 10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : DATE DATE BOND NO. AND TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . Rev. 1/77 V(CI\I O'N\\ - CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON `" A HINGTON �,V ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM U .••''. 11.1 ot` NNING FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: ® Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent f h/ g/2/ERE 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: , oo /2v i/, j C. Av6. %cL. 25S - ��o 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: F2211-,/ 5a' 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : 3 L o: 06.7- /764-r (9/.) . , 76/4-er N�au�zL y ��r2C:D exh Ti! d-e. ReS7,p l(" o _a7c (zg5 4 S7 "b �N- 4 poov ,-)mac._ /aro /cc=. l'91..o'D DN i"i j Z3'fi i242 f V S7 V/ 7 7-7 7 -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe. the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other :information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : /&v 0411//t1-( % /6/. 6 3. c/,k %h/ac.T— (ep Lc: 6✓/1/zc-P eztt7J t-Y /-/;7 /- 712 Od. Au-A. /c3 7� Xage 70 6-J-sr 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : ' 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal. (federal , state and local --including rezones) : ...574-/ate.7 PA-7' 511 5.,/ /.)-,9 /-7e-/Z /77' 10. reatedhto or connected with this proposal? I you enor ture ar expansion, yes , explain: activity related 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: kro 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: 27404 7 Hsi r 57 /2677J-fir II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all yes and maybe answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic r/ substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- . . covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO • (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? l (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? TE- MAYBE WU— (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which' may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean for any bay, inlet or lake? V- . MAYBE NO Explanation: (6) # ) 6//7 2%?/O' 5 /24Zig7/✓<° " /.3ei/c Ad c) CidM-S;,�E;?rJC?/B�-� -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air ✓ quality? VES MAYBE (b) The creation of objectionable odors? VTET- WEE WV ' (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? , Yr MAYBE WU— Explanation: • (3) !later. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements in either-marine or fresh waters? MAYBE WU— (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE KU- (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE WU- (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ' YET- MAYBE W (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE IVB— • (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? VET MAYBE NZ- (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? �� MAYBE AU— (i) Reduction in- the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YU- MAYBE W — Explanation:(h) /7,2 Wo,- ever % 3CPTic PAN cos (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? VET- MAYBE ND- (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? WI' OWE n--. (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing • species? VET- MAYBE WU— (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? vrr_ A15- Explanation: 4111, -4- 41111 (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or 'numbers 'of any species. of fauna (,birds, land animals including • reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , ' insects or microfauna)? ✓ 1TE5 MAYBE FT0— (b) Reduction of the 'numbers of any unique, rare or ' endangered species of fauna? - YES— MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement • of fauna? YES MAYBE. i (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES • RATITE- NO . • Explanation: • (6) Noise'. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? ✓' YES MAYBE . KU- Explanation: • (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or �. glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the • present or planned land use of an area? YES—. MAYBE ' NO Explanation: • • (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Increase in the rate of use of any .natural resources? YES ' :MAYBE . NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? ES MAYBE NO • • Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the, proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release'of hazardous substances (in'cluding, ' • but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in .the event of an accident or upset conditions? ✓ YET MAYBE 0- Explanation: • • • (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- • bution, density, or growth rat:: of. the human population of an area? Y ES }MAYBE Fri. • Explanation: �4�5'/RCrc &�i'o 4?-; �iv 0c2P 9 i/CA✓ -5 410 - (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? �-- YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or -demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? L— YES MAYBE El— , (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YE§— MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? [-.— YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? e___ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? 1..-- YES MAYBE NU— (b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilitie , including roads? t___ YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES-- MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? YES WRY NO (b) Communications systems? �-- YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? _ YES MAYBE NO 11 . 1 4111, lip -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYS NO (e) Storm water drainage? yam- MAYBE N(S— (f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE N6 Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive l-- site open to public view? YES RA-Trir NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the l� quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE TO-- Explanation: (20) Archeological Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, objector building? YE MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. A Prop(!!!„) signed (name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 — --, 1 • tr41 ;,•,44,.;3.,:,., if--''4, 14-1 '-' i '.'.. •.', if4Itk, ft.!, ,t'' • ',!; `4'., 41 U.:1,.; •„,,, t't 1 '''‘';"f-rW'' f'?' ,;4`,.:',;fA. 4. r g. ,, it-,. ... .,,,,,,„ , - .,„,: n,,,,,,, , .: ,,, _ ..,„ - v., ,,,,,- .t i .-w ,,,r,, , ; t, - SV' . aft ';:-.." 1, Zi,15, ,,,, . IP' .11, . 1 r: ` 'Ir s 'J !.1 /6"-i, .00 ,, ,,, f ,,, .0,, 'ik, 4,c :1,,, . ' • .: •' , „,' ,,;`,.:* ?lye' f,,,,".'‘,..:' •Iii N•-• -.,, 414 «Ape, '6'1 *-§r 4',".VI* ,'+',!. 1 '-ir.rr.,4.',tr.,•!' „.7*Ar., re, ' , .. k, A.,i 4 0 t, ^1.,.... '14;H 'e : 1 i 4:1, ''' ''4',,, , it ;,..-,'''' e....4, •••. , '',, 1.+'-' ..q ,.., GENERAL LOCATI.14: ,',.,ND, • PDDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF .1800 DUVALL AVENUE N . E. LEGAL '1ESCRIP11(1.N: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE. RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. IS P tSTED T.* NOTIFY PROPERTY • %, NERS 1W . er „r„,...,. 4, , ...,,,%,c , ,,,^ 01,PV`' ., -,. ",;11,.,, ,M 3:I ,,,4"..,'"•'j.."', ci rit '1,,V, ' ' fo' li ., ,,D.„..,., ,,,,,,,i,:.:„. n 4.'4 m 'r. ',.4.'" : 3 ''r.'l 4'n '.:4 Ai. •,..r ,,, TO rE HEL* IN CITY C ILINCIL CI-IANIBERS, MirfvICIPAL tUILDING IN MARCH 6, 1979 4: ic,',11,,'Pkb,1 ?.' i T .., . -- A.M.O.,&. ' Il+ ,rill, G , . q inn A M , It,?„,,.. .. ... . .4 Ilk t.' r E 7'11,^1;41‘t,f, -, ,:-.' 1-, ''.4 6 „o ..k. , ,. . A I.4 't r ' 1.- 1 T 1 ''t 0 ‘11 I ran 'fr 4, — G TO SR-1 Or • . PIS, 4 kW. + ; "'.s.,1V,. - 40.... t .. ::,,,, '411k) ' ' ', El k''j‘1411.4V! I - ‘ t r'' '1 ' •- ) 4., P. 4' 4 ' NI '. ,• ..', 1 ,•.. . • $4. , ill 'I,!", -.'ilk e ',, i'.• OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS ,,,, ,.., -, ,,,.. .- i,,:, -- . 14 —1/4,- firs:"- 1)14 r.::, Iv . '''' '."— -% ' A •,-• •-:-- • •••ti , ) , - - :,..4,,,- ill ,,.1; ft, '..16 41., f/ '• • ;i— q to,' , ..„, / ,..,,,,, i ,,, :,,,,..,.,..1,,,,, _ .','.i„ %••••,.• k N ' Ill t, . ''v' ' .:'' THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RE. PIPESTEM LOTS „.,, FOR FURTIIEff` INFO:i.F..•ATION CALL 235 25:::4 — THIS mOTC E ,,,, •,‘,T I* E1E RE4 ItV:-.4 WITHOUT PROM A.z THORF: %.11(..',. NOTICE OF PUBLIC NEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 6 , 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. DENNIS D. AND LOIS E. HYLAND, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3, File R-305-79; property located at 516 Williams Ave. So. between Burnett Ave. So. and Wells Ave. So. 2. FRANCIS J. BRIERE, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO SR-1, File R-306-79; property located in the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N.E. 3. FRANCIS J. BRIERE, APPLICATIONS FOR THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL, File 307-79, EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RE. PIPESTEM LOTS, File E-308-79, AND WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, File W-309-79; property located in the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N.E. • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 6, 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED February 23, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION 1 , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the . 'v'"d a,y of , 19 -'q_. �/— SIGNED 114-'e w • 1. rs PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING • MARCH 6, 1979 APPLICANT: FRANCIS J . BRIERE FILE NUMBERS : R-306-79, SHORT PLAT 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR-1 and a proposed three-lot short plat. In order to allow such subdi - vision , the applicant is also requesting an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to permit two 25-foot pipestem roads . In addition , ,the application includes a request for waiver of the required off-site improvements . (Site development map attached . ) :; . B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : FRANCIS J . BRIERE 2 . Applicant : FRANCIS J . BRIERE 3. Location : Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N . E . (Vicinity map attached) 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : ±3. 34 acres 6. Access : Via Duvall Avenue N . E . 7 . . Existing Zoning "G" , General Classification District , :. 8. Existing Zoning in "G" , General Classification the Area : . . A District ; King County SR (Mininum lot size 7200 square feet with sewers ; 15 ,000 square feet without ) . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential . 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing 'date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on February 23 , 1979 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordi - nance on February 22 , 1979. C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2945 dated July 17 , 1975. D . - PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography: The site is generally level . 2. Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow ,to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops , and for urban development. a PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79, Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6 , 1979 PAGE TWO 3. Vegetation : Low scrub grass dominates the property with a dense stand of Douglas Fir Trees extending the length of the east boundary. Parts in the north portion have been cleared and graded . 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suit- able habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land Use : An existing single family residence and a large shed are located in the southwest portion of the property. Another single family residence is located immediately north of the site. Additional single family dwellings are found to the south, and west while the property immediately east remains largely undeveloped. E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is composed principally of widely scattered single family residences . F. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and' Sewer : An existing 12" water main extends north- south on the east side of Duvall adjacent to the subject site and a 3" main is located on the west side. An 8" sanitary sewer runs east-west on S. E. 101st Street approximately 1 ,000 feet north of the subject site . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Ave- nue N. E. approximately 3/4 of a mile to the southwest of the subject site. 4. Schools : Honeydew Elementary School is approximately one mile southwest of the subject site , and McKnight Middle School is 'within 1 3/4 miles to the west , while Hazen HIgh School is within one-half mile to th.e south . 5. Recreation : Kiwanis Park is located approximately one mile to the southwest of the subject site and North. Highlands Park is within 2 miles west. G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-729, G , Residence Single Family. 2 . Section 4-704., SR-1 , Residence Single Family. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 ; Short Subdivisions . 2 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 . 6B; Waived Improve- ments . 3. Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1109 Exceptions . 4. Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report; Objective 6 , P. 18. I . IMPACTS ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Minor PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6, 1979 PAGE THREE 2 . Population/Employment : Minor 3 . Schools : Minor 4 . Social : Minor 5. Traffic : The proposed short plat will generate approximately 20 additional vehicle trips per day on Monroe Avenue N . E . This would increase traffic flow by less than 1% per day on this arterial . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the Cityof Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , no determination of environmental significance is required for the short plat. However , a declaration of non-significant impact has been prepared for the rezoning due to its scope . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map element which designates the site and general area as single family residential . , 2. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject site into three parcels . This will require the approval of a short plat by the Hearing Examiner . In addition , exceptions for two pipestem roads and a request for waiver of off-site improvements will be required. 3. The subject site has been zoned "G" since it was annexed in 1975 .. Review of the Planning Department records does not indicate an areawide zoning review of the site since that time. 4. The subject site is located on the east side of Duvall Avenue N . E . The land on the west side of Duvall within the City is presently zoned "G" also . Some properties in King County on the west side of the street are zoned Suburban Residential with a minimum lot size of 7200 square feet with sewers and 15 ,000 square feet without sewers . Portions of the properties have been subdivided into lots 9, 000 to 13 , 000 square feet . All properties in the applicant ' s proposed short plat would exceed 18, 000 square feet. The proposed rezone to SR-1 appears consistent with the existing properties in the area and , therefore , appropriate for the site . . The Land Use Report , 1965 , advises : " Encourage the development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desir- ability as a place in which to work , shop , live , and play. " (Objective 6, p . .18) 5 . Suitable water supply is available to the subject site. However , the nearest sewer line is approximately 1/4 mile to the north of the site , and the Utilities Engineering Division advises that pumping would be required . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER i= ., ; f� PUBLIC HEARING.: FRANCIS ,J . BRIER.E , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat` ; : 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6, 1979 . PAGE FOUR . 6. All the departments reviewing this proposal indicate no objections other than the situation in #5 above . 7 . Analysis items 3 and 4 appear to comply with Section 4-3014 , thus substantiating the proposed rezone . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENATIONS : Approval of the requested rezone from "G" to "SR-1" based on the compatibility of the proposed use with the existing uses • ;;' and that the site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review. N . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS (SHORT PLAT ) : 1. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan , which designates the site and surrounding area as single family residential . 2. The proposal is compatible- with adjacent single family residential uses and similar patterns in the area . 3. The size of the .existing property is large enough that the proposed short plat is a:reasonable use of the land . Proposed Lot #1 is approximately 21 ,605 square feet , and Lot #2 is approximately 105 ,4,60 square feet. Lot #3 with the existing residence is approximately 18 ,496 square feet . 4. Although the lots of the proposed short plat do exceed the minimum lot size requirement of the SR-1 zone and the Subdivision Ordinance , the amount of frontage. on Duvall Avenue N. E. is not sufficient to meet the 75 foot standard for each lot. The applicant is therefore proposing Lot #3 with a 125-foot frontage with Lots #1 and #2 designed as pipestem lots with 25-foot frontages and 125 foot .and 145 foot pipestem lengths respectively.. 5. The parcel immediately west and north of proposed Lot #1 is separate and apart from the subject site and contains frontage on Duvall Avenue N . E . Because of this location , proposed Lots #1 and #2 cannot meet the frontage require- ment of the SR-1 zone . It would seem , therefore , that reasonable justification can be ,provided for the exception as proposed in #4 above . (Section 9-1109. 1A) 6. .: The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department 'advises that if and when Lot #2 is developed , the additional 25 feet of . right-of-way in Lot #1 will have to be acquired to provide, for a full 50-foot wide street with improvements . 7 . At this time off-site improvements along Duvall Avenue N . E . are very limited . Therefore , deferring improvements until a future time appears warranted. Thus , the waiver of off- site improvements subject to restrictive covenants providing for future LID participation appears satisfactory . 8. - At such time as Parcel '#2 , s , further developed by a street extension , area-wide` circulation can be addressed to insure access , if required , to 'the" east of this parcel . 9. At the time, of this report prepara,ti.on , we have received no written comments from outside departments . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79, Short Plat 307-79,. E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6, 1979 PAGE FIVE 0 . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval of the short plat and proposed exception for the pipestem lot , subject to the following conditions : 1 . Final Public Works Department approval of storm drainage plans . 2. Payment of standard fees as per Utilities Engineering Division comments . Waive off-site improvements subject to provision of restrictive covenants providing for future LID participation for improve- ments to Duvall Avenue N. E . i'-0 o6L ' = ` � 1..,frr1 i -_ A •.c rr,,,,, ,=i`i 'ter 'Ws V 77'O' ti .40 1.:s 7,7,, --- - - - - - - I 4 _./'i, '%!; d�dB I;i /rn7G� rid G'Z/O�>'U _.-_ _ _ __.__--_ _-_.__. ._-_-_ - _ _. • r C4!/,'jfY--fin i ......0 ..::: I • ,. 9,O R./ i i s ` "__„ ,;. 3, vg ram, +; I j H I { �1id J( I {�� 1 • r., I r QI � . ' . i `* I 99N Alva .� - y� f-c'roNS Ni i va-ada 9 y��yb �. f i N/ LAN I I-piefik9 il6T 6 633 n o T�� ® • • • 3%..4.-, . • \ ' 1 * ' ....s.. VI' -7' •.- ). . . -.. _ ... . ..... . ... -77- '-• --- ---- • .— • .........., ....., , - . .1 •..„•,. '.., $.44 •-• -- ---• •• •-• '-t49.41•P 3.4r. ' • .----•---.• . , . ., —__ . - — .-- -- • • ......._..... ...._ ' --. . .-• ' -:::\,,,,,....,..,.. ,,k,i:.:i :..:,i..•::. ,, eA . ••,14. . 'IP; • •. ..7.%,...._ ,, , . , . . • . . . . .•'., r .. ill . ., ' . . • .,,4:1'; 1".1C1, .4::4,.' • .• ?.,:.,v ; . , • • , • • '01'''4, , ail'',.'.V. ''' •. • •• '11.1:Ay OR',;#x,, •,, • • , ..... :,.... . -i-k:, .- , .. , .• f '.34, .....,' •• '''' • ' . . -. "- , '',. ....,,.,,•. in, ''•;-•••1•K'VLVA ;:l . ----- - ------ _ __ — •, -.^'''• 03:7-..., ..,-4 ' 4.'7: ';...%!.."..V".•. ,.. ,1,..i • I .. , te.; . • . •,,, .,,,, . € • ' 'ti; .• , • - . ,•..1 • • ., i . r-•§ ' ..,,,, ,. . •.:,,,, • - i . ,..ts..;•,,, ig ...,x ,• •/, .• '..k ' ' itit,..009; , •'!,• r. ' W. ; .____........-----__ _, s,_.... • • . • 4 N,....1,., -,4 .,, .,, •• ,;,,. • .,, 1.1.,, . . , s....•,...,•4 t.••••,,r k,,,,,••.1, 'Li:0. 1 „,-,,,./, '.''... it,L• 'It ''' . . . i . ...., -2•P . 1 1 $, V t, 11' . ' i• • "i- ' ' „. • 141(1 . • . . •• 1 .1. ^ ''''; " ' . • • • ' . , • . • 4+...t . 't•-• -,c '1 • • •. • ' • ' tAtit \ 1,4; ,._,,,... •, ..1.r. ,,,' -..,.....,,,•••,,,,,,t„No.,A1,1,-Evattc,:,-‘77,0110.11-11.5"4:ip-R42,.,..„, •.i ''' ..:1.1. Y.':',.;**1-,Pgr4-1 z.,,,,-.0,,,,••-f.,. 4- ,•0, ._ ._ ...., 7,. ,./., . , . , ...t- 7.... i • . i. ' ' • -,Yetii". g" .1 I F. 1. t..,4 ,6 Yef ' : ‘,11 • ;;Pt.i * .., C.::,., "%.,,.. . , ,' .: '• S ' J.. ,' ..i . . ;*,4:• • • ,,-; P kw,: , . .., i ' . f•:`', . . . .F, %pk.- • • r ,. . ,. •4 . ' i i 1 ..,4" 1 • s •7 J. • 1 a' 1' f tc6.1 -.. . • .<•4, • — , -14 •Al.—I-Kr/4,0r- *t :"• 414'' '''• " 70,7,04.,f.,••iitaRfa,*,.-•'.4,5, k‘..,,),0. '';',-. ' • .:(.. . ,. i! • ',"h .;.'s ... . ' 1 - t .' e / i;,,,,,IS • . 4;t , 41: Of I . • • 4t,',, r. '''''' i 14.' '1/ ,,'4 ' .• " '0' . i • • , •^^ qt 'Vf. . i..':.., it ",:,-s? .• s.' l'-' 1 1:',':';^t 'It • ..,...--"' AA: ', .. 4tt......_.i •,', „,.. . ,, ...... . -.,,i . , ''';4:,, , ,•,. -,- ciu,,,,,,y40,k, -, .4. , 1 , .4.,•• .;.:',, - . . ._--_____—. • %tr. t ...." . „ . \ • IA tr. • *) . • , __\\____:_r71.1 "...-- :t'"::::' .11111 .------- • -----. 1.1 •• ; Ilk i . , is, fr,1 • ilS . :el •'' .. . i . . ..,- — '''. ' ' . frsc' , h • • ,ljr:1"4t t#'?kt,, #Lr .h..94414. - % ' gal -'.....,-.. . ' ••• l' 1 I ' '''Ir 1 1-.• " • . . .. v.. . o t.•-,,I, .,,i .:',.Y . '• -;',A..1 , ,.4-!' . -tl," •'Xiietti„,b,4 t:S.11.. ,LW.4-44. : • ^.,-"."",:t.: ,,z4.1 __. . __________,_:_____ ..f'04;:,,,,.., 414—„,t,; ,,Y;:,"''' _..., ' ••ni,,.,-,../ •••"- . -4 - ..,,,, , t . . .10'• , . ,r ? , ; . .1.‘,,76; /- :., i . . • • .„ - _ A& ,.. •--. ,1„ , ao •tt•.4 .% t ! . . ,.....- ,.... A. ' '' '1."-. 4i 4, ' , ,„. i. ';- y , f i 1, ( ,I . • i , • te. k •k""r"i ,„Ji"7 , ' t ,,,4' (1 ,, \ .. • ..., 1 l' ,,,r, t -,, ' • ..i ,1 ' 1,.. ' Al A ‘ I ' 4 1 • 5 11 ••••.• . ---,y-tt t-, , ,L , , .7 • . 1 ., i \:tze:==.. -'' '.4 . e.. • 1 . . i • . ' •1,i ..:' • 9,. 1 4 t a"..r • ' ,r, %. . _ - . • t!' .1, . ' A !?. ,' ,i ..• ,- - e' -"„ t. ti ,.. .. t , ,, . ,- - . •a 4,' •• .. • • . - - ItIottill . 1 4. 1 titteki oeb....11 1 .... 1%...... )31.kiet.- itici- 4_ 14 , . • . . . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : 0 Finance Department Fire Department Library Department cPa Department 0 olice Department Public Wo ks Department O Building Div . Engineering' piv.. (Please verify legal descriptic O Traffic Engineering Div , ® Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or hi4 //) signee ) ifc, gvr/� DATE : �t� 7, PLEA E REVIEW T ISO APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 4 09 /L/ , ze LOCATION : ogo ,a/a1/ ..�, ,- 4 / APPLICATION(S ).: c�7 ,a7- 7-79 i, 64 t&fitt 196-0 OO / evleit--ji, 0 • 7-,--.. IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : `2 e l> 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : En Approved '-'71'E'EOof Appr v d Comments or conditions : • __ ort___ 5kte ,t,„7,t;__,-- -- 0 (Ap"-e,t— //i-- -- z ,j,.,11 4........4_ 4-0 4,, ,..t..4...." .11-0--- 11.-k---' itL: Q 5, 2_ 5z , -2 y ,.‘ .,<,..c'—4-- 4-t czn—e;---g-IL 0-az A.:— ____2- 4t.`j *-.64.. -- - 6„....,....at....../..t,1 1,,, -- e, (....."., (14.4.-.11.474.4,1,4"-' i pa[CaJ c 0 cY ,'74 o.►n-.l Zo e e-?L a./a ,,N.VA-// Are, Ai, . Z( al/ ? Signature of Director or Authorized R presentative Date ! 4 . , ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department . ® Public C!'orks Department Building Div . OEngineering Div. (Please verify legal descriptic OTraffic Engineering Div . ® Utilities Engineering Dim . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed. by responsible official or his signee ) . 54/79 /� C .' eGriii,g/ DATE : PLEA E REVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 4 /fele , �l LOCATION : `I '. â'i' // ` t �� _ APPLICATION(S) : Ab mt79t'i%' , etote. v6'1 o o � � . #4/vim 'i IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO, THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : Ig REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . ., Department : 'ZL,06- Z' Approved L. Not Approved Comments or conditions : .. Signature ek ector or Aut rized Representative 4 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department 0 Police Department O Public Works Department O Building Div . Ongineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptic IX/ - Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his signee) /AO 47 C &rill" DATE : 9/4 7 PLEA E REVIEW TAIIs APPLLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : `� i ner e AT I O N : - t/a ..AlOg °� ° ,�'LOC � s� ofAPPLICATION (S) : c61/�p�-7e /Qf� W179 `. `/i eallee, 04, 0 '1/ Vide, 0 '/ice IN ORDER NYOCOMMENTSUTODTHE PLANNINGRDEPARTMENTHEARING EX MIN A 7 RETURN A , • • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ' _ Department : f=.l— l C, ' ,�" Ak-v 1iuE C. l' ( N G Approved El Not Approved /Comments or conditions : � zz 1 ' '��:. Signature of Director or uthor''ized Repr entative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Q Finance Department . ' 0"- Fire Department 7 lo Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department (Ti Public Works Department ® Building Div . 8Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description Traffic Engineering Div. eaS `12:, V Utilities Engineering Div . ,< FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or . O his si/gnee) eZ6frial DATE : ii/7# PLEA E REVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR : . APPLICANT.: /4 /lei&s I ' LOCATION : /I 'b06/ ' /1/ APPLICATION(S) : 645e, 'at- V Y9 `. 64 4(09(6 /0600 0 o ,e/ i%d G °)" IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : e v 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r/ roved Not Approved C�APP p,,2 iiyr�//r a/z //Yroizr,,L)7S Comments or conditions : ,CzQu/i�G`� /i,�' /''C2 ./�<,e_6-- C'f«--7-:-. 4.,4 7--f-le il- 7'�r2,v—/f/erK,vr0 �i2 ,Pleze'G'��c-Y %` 'u c, ,.�L�i- i2 �� Cc�rS GviY/ , ,'3( -5S ,9-r✓L_fief /1 Y/-9g/x- <S (-S/t/I-u_ <?Gt //vS i ze � 2 i`�r; , gi-i f c o ,i7'/ /1/4 <4-0/,Vc G cl<z /�tfc 7c r'✓• /L`/t/ti.. S'/t/,'Gt- / r: 7770 0 T / r2 ( /2 ') / --2 7_2 677 Signature of Di recto or ut .orized Rep esentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UiI1Ir/6-S c [ 3 Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : j) ) ,,„,b, A---- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date G ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department :wilding Div . 0 Engineering Div . Q .Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his design 1 4-ap e g ,,tia/4 e /o 29 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No. : Action Name : fr 1 447/ Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : g, /9 Note :, Responses to be written in ink . 6 I REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 1 ! SIGNIFICANT J ON :SIG I ICANT Comments : • (=:_ i4341— 2,1/44/ 77 Signature of Director or Authorize Represe tat ' ve Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department . Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department re'-'Public Wo ks Department Building Div . Engineering Div . ® Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his design // e 45./4e e/4 v ; SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : Ae?' e'l /dV . Please review the atta ched . Review requested by (date) : 7 Note : Responses to be written -An ink . - REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . Department : . (860) ---*, ..., . ! SIGNIFICANT ' . 1 .1NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : • C Z 2L2 7 � 24�'' �� Date Signature 7Director or Authorized Representative ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: (2) Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department • ® Public Works Department 8 Building Div . E veering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his design p e &‘/fietv. z//09 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : / /LlIi / /1E?°_-,1(' '' :evil /f'AI/ M/ ..r;��Please review the attached. Review requested by ('date) : i / Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : -� c- /VGlNCC1--iitl6 `• SIGNIFICANTSIGNIFICANT Comments : (1- __7:--7°� Date Signature of Director or'" u`tfiorized Repres 'tative r ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ®11 Finance Department • Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ®( Public Works Department 8 Building Div. Engineering Div . affic Engineering Div . !�' Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his design , �� &i9 _ /rap e gzoilefoc - SUBJECT : Review of ECF- ; Application No : Action Name : 14 Awe Awe ,c/50/1 lir 1WWWl! y!; ./ /a Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : eio, 79 Note : Responses to be written in ink.• REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : - _ .. . Deyartment : /et l__rSIGNIFICANT 1. i NON SIGNIFICANT f', /t74.7/ /�/0/2 L17• Comments :. �r�u//C , /4 S `-i>7= Clf,G�'", Gri/!-z �4-iti j''i2e.,f- , -,u/ //,S` u/L n-S /ems,<<,��- o ay 4.-- �i� C ee'.,2i4.%C' /1e- '.O w/ // T<z/2-,Ci-/i ce-c.'o fa: G- c,,e‘Z7 'y ,i,�� .P,‘," 'c:r rC6. /feeds - F7 /tyCW/4 _5' S/l1 ' /3�• ,R&S7/7L�G .- ,47'� - 1 /2 u('� 1/.24 air S ld /L'y 4[t2-0<'ti�' Cd.c.S'` rlG��• /`?/4 , / S/..1/ - /16 0 rvei,t✓i7-7 o'/L Satc i.(f (/ el/ . -2 7_c7_,, /7,7- Signature of Director or Authorized Represent iv`e Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UT,LIT,6-c (5P' M' SIGNIFICANT ' - 1 NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : IioS SL-(�`iONrSw^( wn-C_ 12�0..,126= ,G l.✓AT2tr7 `,ereWS'ON, i 1- /S4.r r. Fu2 „✓"G`'.z-- ,„)0 cp4 A Pp,1Li1 FU it_ , _, NI SV`^4L'2 SI:r-AJ,Ca A✓1 n--12,LG. it1 r1,5 Ti--'1 CT 11 . .2/?6,/-7 7 Signatu a of Director or Authorized Representative Date .PROPOSED/FINAWECLARATION OF SIGNIFICAN ON—SIGNIFICANCEa Application No . R-306-79 ® PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-434-79 X� FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant requests approval of a rezone from "G General Classification District, to "SR-1", Single Family Residential . Proponent FRANCTS .1 . BRTERE Location of Proposal ' Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. Lead Agency. RERTfN PLANNING DFPARTMFNI_ This proposal has been determined to. ® have , 0 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ®x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . ' This decision was made after review . by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of/environmental significance : This declaration has been issued for rezoning only based on the compatibility of the proposed use with the existing uses and that the site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review. a Measures , if any that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would ' withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Mann g ec o / Date February 27 , 1979 Si gnature �°��+✓' _ ' ' M . rw City of Renton Planning Department. 5-76 I r ENDING • OF FILE Fig nnF h 1,1/ ,507:7,9