Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-0281I 9 j. x Ti,--, n yp4 ! 9 y ; 1 71AA/tati soh 01...„,tw • .. , lam. , .,,,,,,..../. V ..,zixa,•' ,,; ..iiiii, ,,. • ,;,..:,,, .:,),' :, ;-, LII rove",g,ct..";4,-..-: ---! ' 'i , -•1 re 11011- tiligiiiriVIIPi 7 :1b wt, q. n un. iti : e"'777 y r stl .= . ,.4 . , . . .. . .. , 1 6 . ,.4 MIT*: 1.° lila (1• 4 As&V.Netoto imntitietdelliIIISW - .:',.: `.' . crentr,t„\tici'le ;.' - ' ::irk._,- . 13 A: A u•*i:. r'' i ufr , ti*eP/-l 'SA74s.sI .z, uj niu g. r ,".. .,..-, a. Ibmnx_6tli* a%• fir s A ") 10 t 43 .14 1 "' I.II wt--" -*---i-t---, 1 17. 4} . 40• 1 i S ...f •t l''' 4 n 11 iti.sititti; dd ' ni i up ':11:004;00-04', ' irtsillii, N.EA; alligg 17 r. 1111, t isi. g 1:::: Ab..".:11 ::11.: dildt 01 ' 1116/11>iiiiirli 1 ti dAC,. Q j ram`:1a i ars egosIIt10 $)!),IZli $ a . 1, ` 1iVrtO ;2 glk? rc Iraq II ©eZ r N.E. G- z PL. t ea C6 Q1 1':,• ; .to.,..- . ; , Siif•ft. CA T`I;+ ,1 glom gi-J1 t t 1 _i '1 it i' L:_ 'e w ;1 M s g t"i el to Ira tf H TellSC.,a'u1'4,It NI 1`a1.16 19 L )*t Z3 LO l' -. 1 It ` q.M.i1 a tilIN1 . c, Puma— I L t'l Ls `,;.1' iE ! 1 1 I . I:.ilimu N.,,,c- I K 1 r r PUIIIII-ic I jjusemitt v/.c. 1 - ti r 1 / l'iValt. ' 0 19 i I r I r r tJP i r r c: aO • o r r 1 r I J r t CITY OF ENDTON 4 l' i 1 FARING!EXAMINER r'4 -- 9 i A 1 t r G AM t 219+1 PM c-» l..J 718.6.10,1111211.2ta,4,r516 OF RF t x RE FII/Foo E -ER ' r MAR j197) 2' E ,4), J I I i- r ITFkM '01. i i' K14/&D 1 r 6 iR 1 ter;t. C c.2f-7'7 1 eijA .t i, Affidavit of Publication r` = IP G• • STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 e E` COUNTY OF KING }ss. P r Be•tty••Morr•i•s being first duly sworn on 9=NG D%%' oath,deposes and says that..she is the ..c.hie•f..•c•1er•k of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, Washington.That the annexed is a Pi b],ic Hearing x;!. NOTICE OF r.'PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USERenton...1.and..ue.e HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARINGasitwaspublishedinregularissues(and WILL BE HELD BY THEnotinsupplementformofsaidnewspaper) once each issue for a period RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'AT HIS REGULAR MEETING of O Ileconsecutive issues,commencing on the IN THE COUNCIL CHAM- BERS, CITY Hall, RE-. NTON,WASHINGTON,ONlath_day of MaX C.23 19...7..7....;and ending the MARCH 29, 1977;AT 9:00 AM. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. REZONE FROMdayof19bothdatesGS-1 AND S-1 TO R-2inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- AND R-3;-file No. R-028-scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee n' iNoPerty bcated on charged for the foregoing Monroe Ave.N.E.betweengggpublicationisthesumof $..2.1..9,6which N.E.-6th St and N.E. 4thhasbeenpaid-in full at the-rate of per folio of one hundre words for-the—St. •first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent 2. REZONE FROM Ginsertion.. TO M-P;file No.R-031-77; property located on West Valley Highway between S.W.43rd and S.W.'41st. . e-4.... . ... 8-1• ZONE; file No. SA- 032-77; Property located 18 t h between Shattuck Ave. S.Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of and Whitworth Ave.S.im- May S ly-north of Houser M arch 19...77. ALL INTERESTED PER- SONS TO SAID PETITIONS j C.ARE INVITED TO BE PRE-a, 6 •••• SENT AT THE PUBLICNotaryPublicin• nd for the State of Washi on, HEARING ON MARCH 29,residing at Kent, King nty. 1977 AT 9:00 A.M. TO EX- THEIR OPINIONS.GORDON?.ERICKSEN Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June RENTON9th, 1955. PLANNING DIRECTOR Published In The RentonWesternUnionTelegraphCo. rules for counting words and figures, Record-Chronicle March 18,adopted by the newspapers of the State. 1977. R4247 I OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY. COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Gerald E. Schneider FILE NO. R-028-77 LOCATION: Approximately 600 ' north of N.E. 4th Street on Monroe Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests rezone from GS-1 and S-1 to R-2 and R-3 to allow development of low to medium density multi-family housing. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: . Recommend approval with RECOMMENDATION: restrictive covenants. Hearing Examiner: PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 22 , 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 29 , 1977, at 1: 30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and Mr. Roger Knotts , representing the applicant, had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1 , and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Plot Plan. Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map. Mr. Smith indicated that a previous application for the subject property was submitted on February 5 , 1975 , which excluded the northerly property and recommended R-2 zoning to the City Council. The request was subsequently withdrawn. The Examiner inquired about Item 0. 4. of Exhibit #1 regarding the southerly 30 feet of N.E. 6th Street. Mr. Smith indicated that regardless of the proposed development, the city would require the street to be widened and dedicated. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to designate the setback and buffer areas in the requested zoning areas. Mr. Smith reported that a 50 foot setback in the form of a landscaped buffer is proposed to be established between the multiple family residential area and the single family residential area and also between the subject site and existing developed single family residential property. R-028-77 Page Two The Examiner asked Mr. Knotts, representing the applicant, if he wished to speak on the application. Responding was: Roger Knotts 3508 S. 180th Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Knotts asked Mr. Smith if clustered multiple family units, may be constructed in an R-1 zone under the PUD Ordinance, and inquired about the density requirement. Mr. Smith indicated multiple -family units may be constructed and reported that the density for the R-3 zone, which is contained in the southerly 330 feet of the site, would be limited to 20 units per acre with units limited to 7 units per acre in the R-1 zone. He \stated that in both zoning designations, clustering;_ would be allowed for placement on the site. Mr. Knotts indicated that his primary concern was the setback requirement on the north portion of the site and stated that while 25 foot setbacks were required on other boundaries, a 50 foot setback had been required on the northern portion. Mr. Smith reported that requirement had been imposed. because of the existence of two residences to the west of the site and also from a design consideration because of a requirement for open space which will create an attractive addition to the development. Mr. Knotts felt that a' 50 foot setback from an existing single family residential zone to another single family zone was restrictive. He indicated that under the proposed staff recommendation the site would be required to be °developed under the PUD Ordinance and objected to F-; the restricted density from 30 to 20 units. 'Mr. Smith noted that the department felt that 30 units would be overly dense in relation .to existing single family residences to the north. Mr. Knotts indicated that the proposal in the R-3 zone would be acceptable, but objected to' setbacks for 20 units in an R-1 zone as being restrictive, and reported the desire to consider another 110 feet on the north property. The Examiner asked for further testimony in favor of the application. Responding was: George Pasco 1900 N.E. 16th Street . Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Pasco asked if it was the past practice of the Planning Department to require 50 foot setbacks for multiple family residential zoning abutting a single family residential area. Mr. Smith indicated that the requirement is part of rezone requests in areas where a suitable transition is required to protect the existing single family residential area and reported that a 50 foot setback would be an acceptable minimum. Mr. Pasco asked if the proposed request is the first PUD established in the city. Mr. Smith indicated that it was the second such request. Mr. Pasco felt that the PUD Ordinance was adopted with the understanding that the concept would prevent complications for builders and felt that the restrictions imposed did not conform to the original purpose of the PUD Ordinance in regard to the density requirement. Mr. Smith noted that the Planning Department felt in reviewing the history of the site with regard to previous attempts, for rezoning, the restrictions were applicable. He reported the intent of creating a smooth transition from the commercial area to the residential area and felt that it was a reasonable recommendation. Mr. Pasco reported that the single family residences in the adjacent area were 30 years old and objected to placing a new single family residence adjacent to older homes. . He felt that the overall factor of transition was not the key problem, but was a problem of number of units and their placement. The Examiner asked for testimony in opposition to the application. Responding was: John Tilton 3511 N.E. 6th Street Renton, WA 98055 R-028-77 Page Three Mr. Tilton presented a petition signed by 39 residents of the President Park area which was entered into the record as Exhibit #4. Mr. Tilton read the petition into the record. The objections included lack of neighborhood concept as developed in the policy statement of the Comprehensive Plan and incompatibility with the Comprehensive Plan; rights of neighborhoods to remain in, present configuration; and 90% of proposed site presently bordered by single family residential zone. Mr. Tilton also read a statement into the record which was labeled Exhibit #5. The statement enlarged upon objections listed in the petition and quoted page 4 of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan policy statement regarding the definition of the neighborhood in the community. He stressed the opinion of residents in his area to retain the site for single family residences. The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition to the application. Responding was: Marion Frampton 3622 N.E. 6th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Frampton reported that he resides on the opposite side of the row of houses abutting the new construction. He expressed objections to multiple family dwellings and possible undesirable tenants. He reported that the property contains tunnels under the land which would create a drainage problem. Responding was: Sandra Gist 1025 Monroe Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Gist reported residing three blocks to the north of the proposed site on Monroe Avenue. She questioned Mr. Smith regarding review of the application by the utility department concerning ,storm sewers , reporting previous,problems relating to drainage already in existence in the area. Mr. Smith read a letter from the Engineering Division and indicated that the city requires that no additional runoff be created by the development and imposes requirements for storm drainage. Mrs. Gist objected to further multiple family residential development in the area and felt that property should be maintained as single family residential zoning due to demand for such property in the area. The Examiner asked for further testimony in opposition. Mr. John Tilton concurred in Mrs. Gist' s comments regarding drainage and - stated that a problem already exists in the area following a heavy storm. The Examiner asked for comments in rebuttal from the applicant. Mr. Knotts had no comment. The Examiner asked Mr. Tilton if he had comments on behalf of the petitioners and stated that he hoped a compromise could be reached by. both parties in creating a smooth transition between the existing single family residential area and the subject property. Mr. Tilton indicated that the neighborhood was committed to disallow apartment development on the property and to maintain the area as single family residential zoning. Discussion ensued between the Examiner and Mr. Tilton regarding alternatives for development including requirements for density, setbacks, buffers and landscaping in various zone classifications. The Examiner suggested an alternative to form a neighborhood committee to review the matter with the developer and arrive at a reasonable compromise to benefit all parties involved. Mr. Knotts reported that previous attempts to compromise with the neighboring residents had proven unsuccessful, but indicated a willingness to cooperate. R-028-77 Page Four In response to an inquiry from Mr. Tilton regarding the reason Mr. Knotts was representing the applicant at the hearing, Mrs. Ylova McKenney indicated a desire to speak on the application. Responding was: Ylova McKenney 4140 S. 130th Seattle, WA 98168 Mrs. McKenney stated that she is the owner of the subject property and had coordinated possible development of the site with Mr. Knotts for the past two years. She reported that the property would be developed eventually, was a financial burden in its present state, and hoped that residents would cooperate in arriving at a compromise in the matter. The Examiner asked Mr. Knotts for an estimate of time required to produce a site plan for the proposed development. Mr. Knotts felt two weeks would be sufficient. The Examiner stated that he would continue the hearing until such time as the neighborhood committee and Mr. Knotts had reviewed the proposal. He indicated his anticipation that all parties would keep an open mind regarding the proposal and arrive at an acceptable compromise. He asked Mr. Tilton to contact Mr. Smith when a decision had been made to enable the application to be scheduled on the subsequent Land Use Hearing agenda. The Examiner asked Mr. Knotts to review the total parcel of property, indicate minimum setbacks that could be maintained to enable development, but stated that minimum density need not be reported at this time. Mrs. Gist asked if a PUD would consist of units which are purchased or rented. The Examiner indicated it could consist of condominiums in clustered units which could be purchased, and would provide landscaped open space for the area and stipulated in a PUD when it is granted. The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none , the hearing on Item #R-028-77 was closed and continued to such time as a compromise is reached. Time: 3 :30 p.m. 0 c THE CITY ate RENTONZ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. $0. RENTON, WASH.98055 z salL i10 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI I MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER13ar L. RICK OEEI,ER 1,.. 245,2094. • , 9ii.,. co*0 sEPT.- February 7, 1979 FROM: Marilyn J. Petersen, Hearing Adm. Asst. . SUBJECT: Itiaisiittleil*R"?4‘tilliAGiiititifig04,41.6raalitilitilkidianigigiRefanitbilikiiitile"iiitiiiie8ifloliireitioaseseRiaz7 The public hearing on the subject application was continued indefinitely on March 29, 1977 to allow a period of review and compromise betweenresidentsintheadjacentareaandtheapplicant. A new application for rezone was submitted, File No. R-271,-79, Gerald E. Schneider, and a public hearing held on January 16, 1979. It wasdeterminedthatthepreviousapplicationwasnolongervalidasaresultofsubmittalofthenewrequest. Therefore, File No. R-028-77 isinactive. 1 A C J I `.".......u.w.H14" 4. I.:r.. mmo....7 ......L...... .1.............., r cc: 4ty Clerk, ynanning Department c . ferfipto -• Fes 4,-_, 14•(<" . RECENtti EXAMINE , -- - E XHIBII -.......4 , mn mAR 2 9 1977 PM AM ITEM NO. -. ie e ;____2-Ef-L-2----7 ' 7,819,10,11,12,112,3,415,6 Mar oil 1977 i W e t h L;rid er s Ifs n ed. residents of Rent on, We s,la ingt on h 0 v e stud led e f.am 11 I er ,,,i it h t'h e nr cp.-os.ed r•e z one r equ e st, L flu'o;0 a s t he ' ' ':':' . . '''' • S ch.n e id er 1.-..ez on e F i le ;''',/ -C28-77. We believe th i s . 1 r ez on e ''.r eciu ert shou.1..d not be sr ail t ed or the f.01 low Ins r ea s on s';' 1.' Over 90:'-ic of the ere e;e;Id ent,:; 'ire r or,flosed to tne r e z on e. 2 . The; nel,,Lhberhoo,.1 concert an d,-:velor;ed in 1 ollcy Statement 1 of the ben ton (..;orm-,r en ens I v e i-.Lan 5.-s not ev id ent In the re:7,one . rou.ent ; 3, The proosed I'eqUOflli IS not 1,9 complete accord.' n.e 1,en 1.;on C()MY."'ea 00:'-',L V i'=.: i'DI-(3 i 24* The r e f.3 Id en t s of Rnd an:y other nel,-..,nborhood have a ri6ht to e:,,, : ect city 6overnment'.. to ma In t a i n t.' n e V.:;:iborhood In it ' s nr es en t con f lE;I.,re,t ', on, if 1 1-oat' Is Lie ex,L.1.-,..-.7•-•3 s ran nd at e of the n e 1.!.;nb orn 0 od r es VI e n t s; nelJzn.borhood :shoe Id be Lie r e9u, Lt of nei.saborhood n-mics, not be n chan,ie im, osed by en dutstde El.;roupw ; 6. ', e,.-1-rly n?0(!,:c of Ln P., lend area nr op os ed for rezone is bordered Cry J. nd e t:-1 er 1%o e...d f,..r [''. .1.;-;C:,].e .F atil I.ly r e s id:en c e or land used for f.,:',';IE 1 e .1.Tn.:1 ly 3'e I{,3 en c e f3 j:r:!iTi O (!_ Y.' In t n 1. n;:l E..') r0. 0FItUre addrens jr1(S.1 111713Y/91 057 4-8, 2.46-k A ‘,.-2-1- 1A-11 v.4,./.4.--, 3.17/ AA 6: A xi,fr-tra- - T- I 112 2 . L, -1 ....j..6.14)aej . c.,-, a:, 11.1..9 W. Tili.Li-c() 521S"I( #•e. _6 l''. ,S-1- Reif/7)6 3 V 5 z-—114,. 11" 3 5,-3 74 e 6014i 6#.0,a Z a/e 6%5 CZ/Ai Z. 9 A/ 7 Z1,4/b 4/9-.-7 .729/1/E/h,-5-...2_ 9 /17 p •D'i TH 7r7. C s-..7--A i A/ tide,' k" • ciura. ...--J. 3 6/7 L; iv 0 A SAPP cl 0A4 -L'ID u,„..3 3,40193) SSil I'V.E art2:_ 35-0 A 1.1,Ife it"L 44 We f ' V 1,21 iireu., 3-- /.. _.-/ . , -,...--.. 71 r/.-- 5- 1-( 7;,?x° ' 7. 1 'f 7C,:).--t /-e-,4? i March 1977 ho tn(, under 4.:ned residents of henton, 'rinshinE,ton hve. studied and are famillnr with the bro-,oned rezone reciuest kng:in as the Gerald .)caneP ,er rezone Fiie i.-028-77. We believe this rezone request should not be 8ranted1or tne followins reasons : 1. Over 90& of Le q.rehs residents are onqosod to toe rezone. 2 . The neihborhood concert as developed in lolicy Stntement of t:le 1.enton Comrrenensive I'lan o not evIdent in the rezone The Fro:osed recic,est is not to comj)lete accord' wit.1 toe . .c;ton ComLreaensive i.lani 4. The residents of tuts ind an.:" otner ne4,nborhood have a ri_Eht to exect city ;,overnment to ,calntain o nelborho',J,d In it ' s 2re,:ient confisurhtioh, if ton t is tie exienn mandate of toe ytibO renidents; Chan.„:e in a ne1H,abornood snould be the result of neirbhborhoo nonies, not be a cnhn:e im, osed by en dutside ,.roup. ; 5. Tehr].:; 90& of toe 1pnd area Hropi for rezone is bordered hy frond either zoned for ztn ;te fPrdili:: residence or 1-,nd used for Eingle Istil,r residences,. ihme ( rInt r,lease) ci:.nnti..:re ad,Thesr, 4A.WLeg:_g_114Z1/1/__ ..e 1 , 2 345. 5 ME b. '''''' F., 6, 9.--- le„ v..._ r 4,,7,. ,ip, Maar ch 1977 toe the undersi. ned residents of kenton, Washington have. studied and are ferniliar with the pronosed rezone request kno-Wn as the Lierald Schneider hezone File # it-028-77. We believe this rezone request should not be 8.rantedfor the following reasons : 1. Over 90& of the areas residents are opposed to the rezone. ; 2a The neighborhood concept as developed in policy Statement of the Kenton Comv,rehenuive "flan is not evident in the rezone c-zirequest ;he proposed request is not is complete accord-' with Lae rtenton Corn.;rehensive i'la.n; 4. `The residents of this and any other neighborhood have a right to expect city government to a intain a noi+ hborhood in it ' s resent conf igurat ion, if that is the e,cur-ese mandate of the neighborhood residents; 1,5. Change in r<, neighborhood should be the result of neighborhood dynr'...;ies, not be a cannge im, osed by an dutside group. ; Nearly 90& of the lend area -proposed for rezone is bordered by 1f3nd either zoned for single family residence or lend used o_ ngle family residences. 1,rame (;,rint ,,ieese) signature address 6N6S %Eie /3. S v-roeft20 63 4 - 3-3!. ALE (, sr,, 21)11r p rt L. J7),'o cI`azeioN j dayli Z. 5.,A11-139-71- 4 .-43q16 ‘(1frg' Z:3?±—' ' • . 4 i F Dec e5C-- €310 KJ .E. E2 N J 6phh"crae 41 o ''s 5,Iti F % (°44 I` z 4 a TA /.t IOa- 55 ,z.e: /0 V e t 10 C! s// .i: / /9 // -,3. 0 07 /2 l c) ---- 8. 3%G?.)-2, '--- - . 1.1 •c•1 - L' \a• C.. ! 1 L/ n........._.. ,. ..dui (14A)),// 1 - ¢ C ,fib l ,S' 1. ` .i i . Auf N- %fZxe s 3 eakt)61 4 r-- 7® r, lip 7.5. 16 1r, 1 PI 2(1, i;-•, Mar c.-i 1977 be tu.e. under;' 1 s,nec.1 renddents of --ient on, l':a sh inEt on Un ye stud led Ind •: -1-.e, J.:sail:liar with Le !')r.o-,on ed rezone requert kno.',.;n as the f n.l_C:, 3 C h.'CI eider 1,.ezOne Fite ,77 11.-(.28-77. 'Pie believe this rezone request :3 -iouki not be p:;ranter.lf or the followInG reasons : L. Over 9 0& of tue aloes r e fl id en t,s are ono(Ds ed to toe rezone. ; 2 , 'i:-L e I-1,.'.1.,,,;L'Ilp or h.o od c on c en t us d eve 1 0 n ed in 1.- o 1 I.cy S tut ern en t Of t:I e io.--)nt on C ornor en ens 1.se .i• Len In not evident in the rz(Dne request : 3. The pro:•osed request is not Is corrip le te accord v:1:Lb the i- cot on Comp 'en,err,Iv e I' l;,,n; 4. (2,.'he r cc Id en t s of to Is rt a ,-,,n;;.; '-.)t i 1 el' n e,1 Ehborh o od hove a r IF at to ex[ ect city L,o v arm:Ent, • to :na 1 n t .i,1 n !R. n e 1_. .n b or n.0 o6. in LI', ' f: t:r es en t, c on f 1.Esuxq t 1 on, I 1 I:,.1.-.1 t Lu s• :fin nO r.. t e of the n e'1.6'n.l'i or n o c.)(1 r e s id ent s; J. Cns.n.c-e In a n 1.E;11b ol'n.ood :;'ci ou Li be the 'r e!.-!u,1.t of n e Ls'a b orn ood 0j 'iSO e 5, '1"):.-t be a c n.a T1L.;e 1.in, os,offi by 9 1:1 rfU.t s 1_f'', e ;sr ou p. 6. l',r_':ar ly 90& of Lee land wee, ').1.op o s ed. fox rezone i s bordered bL,7 l (i (1',:.t:1(_?..C" 7,M-I e:l for :::in ;1 e f a r:i 1.:: r es id en c e or land used for s iv;to trod ]'T .r,--,21'f: en c a s. 1:an-le ( 1 r In t ler, c) c i:•r n t ur e n d(_,;r c=s s laly. -/--,q• -7/14dA 4. OJUL..--7, ifif / • :X 2 I.d:..d.,,,„.. .., ( 1..)---- 3,S2...7,1 IV 41))/--Lizi4g--'.5-. _ iu:-. •-‘- s r, Ci/9/24 Ry/j/7/ 3- 5-7 Y 4 .Z c,.,2 4-3 / e S •-r-• ez: L.:5;•-r?. 0 /r-Z-- /4/-4. --57-, 8*Z-71-e-/./6,— a... n; (4 t/11 c- 3 so 31,4. 9..••4)..;ai.16k, .611.11)Cij LAIAICk--.944,11' -ledj 3c0 S A/E 4/14 „Ty- , 10._ 1.1. 1 12 p e-..f v4,-a4;) 1 '.s;),' C. (::i•1;9 ,'cr .,,t-:ri 1,7.T n 1.t;',.-_ .,. '1;4 1_fj-,7.77 5, i ; ('',F.,, .:.-:--. : 11:i.i..2...1 st-: (-,L,‘-..-ril./-: ':-.1-117: 2..1;..t-:'..,.1,, 0-c.. 4,.,.,(..: .f'07. ',:'ft',y -_,': (,..,;•• f "I' f 2'C",..:5- j. '..,....1,..-) ..:::.,1.1.-1 7",,::: ..,;.....2 •-,r,(:: .1,,....-:-. . 1 ry, 1,-.)7 r:::: 1.; t..1,-.: rvi-rii,oy,..,::;,-.-,c..!...,,y..L1 i-.,2,f.--i ..,-.-,.r.•.*.i..1 c RL. ',,, e, I..;r..:1''. i..,‘: -.,...-..i.:,.1.c;c.c::: RI; .3',3 ';', i",;.; _,, C..c.:,..--il,',..":1 •,-.)']: ''' t)... 1.' ''5.11 C:si.,;5." 1'2 i:-.1...-_-:,_1 :,.:21r.:..1.f-1,..t,.3. k:::'A.':13. C'cl,i':-: '. .:'..I.t'1,1; 1 0,. t:::C' 1.-',E.",";01-1C. OV.---:f (-')'/' Of t:1:-.j. "j.r.'";V-i '• - '- d -:•....''' L. T.., it 1.Cr,'.t-., 2 t,',--tt .1 i"1::._, ''..„:"3.,---:,/ r:', 1.'1 11.Dt. '-rn:t-it tac a, I.; ;, ,--,1:, ....:.:-‘1,1 : 3 t:1C .. 3-n.1-11.11):at; C-1,... 2.1,..3;.;5,on ;31 1-.).,..'.. ,7 -..=.flft .i.:.'r,_ i-,_I(3, ,:,,,,-tvi er ipi:.-2:1-)t b of f:-.,1'e i;ti F; (.:,.:L i..,:i C,,(),,z tie 11. .;',.'t.'t c_1' '-:,.. _:::' 1-.1 I 1r..".3 .. i s t Le (.1.t.: .11.c;rit,:2,r-A.-1 ‘,.1n,:--,, 1..; 1, 1:'"2._1-...--• I.. ' ',. ,..,'71.;_-)ri •••- 9 -i'!2.1,,.Fsta 1:-y .6 1.,:, 0 CLVI'l C',..T!-.0 ..' /1: 1:. '..1-' -' 1,-,`.;0 :1" ,,f-'...' :". 1:;', t.: f..;.".1--1 '",, F..16 c.eit r3 o r e ri i: ill v Er.' r 1r,J c.!--,. 1.12. co: c,.)r-;It:"..011. ii r:: t-Ni. :i' 7:::i1;73-. t::Es 21.1,6 IP:.,'t a r,l'..i. 1'41'1 fr-3 'j121.7,1:C•:-.7: 110'.1. :":,.1.-)C.)",fti r..,)(1)C..) i":C) F3 .t.2',1"1 I:r3 t it, 1,.-.'.'"..2 1 '...1 ...- -;_.'•:-': 1 1'.1.',...) if,',),t, :f..1.'Oiftz",t),t.W'1 1:.:.i. t(.1(S=TF. ',1 '• Kil.Lb! t e 3:-.)()ti (11 f ..:,"I'''. ''.'1E:: 1'r.'''}.(.. ...,:- .11.%,•,,:"'„. 41'....2 (I CDt 7,'..''.1',','rit,e(i. rocc.-', by :.•.12,-*• i....,C'L 1 ti 1.?:1,-3 :I' d CS'''-' 1.1 C)t :/.',....,1:':;';..:' s'i 1 6•• r.--: '''-'-1 ---I f.yff .1.,.c.:1-1); .:, -2. from ',..,i.-.. .,,t .i r-11 1 r'V l'..rt,;`lt *:..?!.:*,ell t,,,,, 1: In 'i .-.),(F., ,..)1.-;:j f ...", Cl..1.4 ().1'; i.--.)111,OT.1 t C: ,,T.,',,T.I.'1:i.)111.',".-3 tr..).E2 d o.v ),-.).,;f.-- -c).44 :1)f t,iir,-.. t---...-.,v .1 i'c.:0,: P. 1.'it:") --..),r:-- :1.::f),2t)f':)::--',..1.(:),-)12....71 ;.,...:y.,1 c( ---.2-2.1. t77.0M;f.1.1":.'',. ....2 1,..C" ',.1 1:,..i e 0 I L0,7,.:1-..,,t ii 1.fl le13;:.J. -,,7.6 11,.....;')).;:d CV)t"i VI'.i.i I. ..:-D1".1 0 1.Est of n ...'E.? ..,".1, '1,.'•--., !.-; .! •. '. ,..:, f-3.::i:s,•.-rr. o.l.f ,„t.c.,), :ie,,:,„" " 1.tvi .,,,lily;.1...13::::, ri e ii.,-;111.)orh.c oc..1:-, t!-.,..,-:. ..-..,.0 2 -,,t 1-' '1,1.(-21.).:::; 71.. C1... cl I, t:r 1.:?,t r. f . CC; of ov ea'(2.'!:' )',.t'+':i.1 r.li-,:, 1::, :-, ::: 2::-If 3 LI"',"1 :1-,1. ,i; C''., ;:.CI C;;L":. -'•,._.r.;t-i cit, c.,:f 1-:c!liz-i,72,y2(7'. .:"? 1, •CL,(.i i v:-. n 1 I,2,1;'('1 "1 1, t .'ii: I In;,or t rt.1].t. c,--)11.,,,1.r..3.::,'.1.- --,•i.., 1.i:-.)..o.n.,. '' .1a r.- Ile ..."2 f:, ••-''.1!')".,':',. J. ':, .1-1(::3.."*.': L1L) :1,' V::',. :r2j,-r:r.:",..,,i,_. .1.13 7,.C.'00:1::, 2 :'''Car_l ..i..i.,,.E' -.."::,1, 17,'J."... 3.,73i3 t r,11`.%'. -. IV:: I.;..1:- :',01".-2.t r,1:3',:i:',.I ..(:,,r.i.r.-;, .-1:".., il,.--,:•r(7_,.. J-,:,,.. c_,...,3 I. ,- r•-_,1.4 -,.„, ,3,:,., L 1 r,.1 :,!•:-,Y,..1.'i.l.P,:-.:, 1.1'.1 1.• : .L.d r,,-.d ..1,-.1.s:. -.-, ..;.._:(..,f;..,, .,...::. f7.,.. -.:', 1.:,' -...'.,-;.: i r?1,-,(...: 0 in fI.y ]. r; • 1 5. 1.t y 1..F.:r F) ' :I J. t t IC1 CYt-4 it Li i cuTi. d Ith. t, t 1;11;1 t..„;. ;1E, 9,0. ts t t c• 1..1r1;(1. 71: t t; v 0 110 Ci. f-)1- C 4-3 Ice 1- (1 tH„. L. LyintG. (..);_f. 1,c; -2 r.r.)t ce-1 tO 010 :3 Ek. 1,1 t, i, r) ( e.; b OluVO ) 01. ti:,1 01'6 y a C."1. •1 Z; ta (lc! L:, 1_ 00DI°'t icr til.e 6.1.• Or.a Y3 1.(1 4-3:0 1. 7, f:•L t, • G(:),;r..ty, Of ',•,;--;e , '..;al.,e, 01. ,. r+:1.:.iAl?,':,;- T)L.•.. :,1) `;.;*e. 1, 1.1 -,. Os,...-- 7.....,C c.: rl. s t...;.t>, t ..E::::::„I',.1; 1,:::e 11.-1..;0 F.ed :)n ',:t'7: b.,7 L.1,..2 C,1.t Li. ,, ES: i:/i.:1.',;.'"7.1.,r,,'5 YLIL:,h.t::OrL1((..)7,t(3., c ca.,.ur 1.:-..f , CI 1.l',.::, c Cp y.1 L:;./ 1)11:i!Ant r Lis 4t*,,..:1, ,r,„nd 4,-....). t t CIL: E.:! 1' a'k::.; '..''.1.',)',..', .L,C: "f,',1 0 t 1.".,` ' IS:,:).e"-) 1-1, ..";,-..i.,A .I 14,..,i.l.el- ?",0 V'::.'1`.1,::./1:---. h 00,.y 4 '., ,53. '.,,---, i 1 •,' ,,,' I. ;la'.:.11 j..I.M'','..t F, t n.c ,til. n e i.I::o-r1.1 or),:.i i.:.!--.!s •[:.b.ir:3 : 1,1';'6.',,, ',,-.) L.: 0 t,'21' : !..r,e r, Or:1•.,.;:.", i:,-1 t .'':_n t tl.e .P.,-.,,1.,,,•:-;(L'e•:-33-.`a o c.fl.. '.1..'1:it, city [_-:,,o v er n lc,el: ;-, (--;-•:• qr y body CI r.,(...-F. 11-3 t :ARV:: ta'5.-,' l''L.'",t,:l. C,, to tin; o:-.,c, cirrv7 r4 r, e d 7'n.1 ', .1:-.i 0 t?.'I:::t I.0•••;1 Cla Y....t, ....e rt.4,re p.14.-co:clf.att--11,y 4107 ::-eet o-,7.. exterior bcl.derr,, 221d Sc.:Lneicle.r itev.tone .i'OC-:!0, CHt4 Of the 4107 feet, -...091 frA orer' on la--6 z:-)-ce 13 I. Hwever Ttpr -(1mt-,tt1 . 530 flert of t b.fa IC'-; '. ^.i.''E.'(-3't:, r C-3, .!,L,',:i .,.1 cc- for 13 1:nr'.,1(3 f ;ll 1.1,Y r '''n I CI e'n e Fi. 1- dr-A In tnrzr, !;,.)(..1 g 6 c-2t, of tee 1091, f est bord er on vr?,oz--)..•czt .i...,--1 rY): -s. ' . T.b.e r efLit3.1.01 ::;r)i.6 rif cot of t.-2 ,,-,i : -,,:',-.:, Eir- :,,, -bord or .1.,,,,,:d 7,c;rs.,erit L ,- -1.-es 1 d.en t i a 1. '.i.'b. ..s 'lean s t 1 7,1.; 3 r;;Li":..., f ':, o'If 14.10/7 foot bode:.' 1.,7-,yadt. 61.1, ",i),.' 'I,oecd for 02:4 in. 1 l...°.'.'i ...§:,':).,.' ;.-' L-7 f ---,.r..1.'L.1.y r:--2!s I Li.(-.:t-,i.v.,.-;L.1. kt t---.: be.i,1 ev t.-.-., t:I.i.i:, •:.-.,b.ib faQt r1,1..-)::-,'2 1 cl 1-1r0 r2•..„;t,'. :,•,-; 1..'.1.*On I; r efu s;:1l of this 'o.,.;.`14i.+2•,,t I. "r.!.. ',4,:o -.cc:,Z,01-1,t7.- ;.!.1 IC, '. 1"0' eI't. ; r,..1.:0,IA ent cal coo Lc %--.-:.)•'erit,(.., a mu.:, 1.1, 1...4 pl cret 1, el c.,'k et of rr, _1 t.,1 171 Lc .;:i '.1 :.:;;;.'„, . ' • ,. 115 t•-;s 1 t Li -mu It 1 , to :1'q.ci i ly 1-n te 011f).o t of a :31.cy 1 e f p-iA Ly r cJ,.Id cc:-., ItIFIA':`-' ar cn 4 Vi 5 is GI:1(3 V c t,11:151.t all of tie 11..,:•,)1.;'s re-1 LI 0 n S arc- 'Ai f f 1..c 1 en c e :-..:f:ttu s e, t o d soy. t I 0 ',..;et-liielder :t.'ez.r..)-!.:(3 1%', -1 i C c',t ion. Ye, "?,!"3 I' --. Fr,1.j r:CI t S, be Lb in :„ (D0(3 E.0 v erect .1,•i-1,..1 In rood z.-...:ninc:. i r°net ICCE; !in.( 1. '," III IT U 1. till:it 74 b.a t 1:4€ -1c)G'Li(...-)V e to be .r 1 ;iit. 1iu.t W e (7.,.-4.1.;110 t:,,' E.,';..1 I, i.',0'..'t tiaI''', rococo al, ]..10r:-.1t i o-a 91,-,.,-.1 3.1 1 1.. .... do w f.,..:,.t ev er to .r.'..-';o C-...2Epry to i.,,-.}Or-Zr 1,, tql.7, t:n.irl ..1'01. el't y •:.'e1.1:i ',,.‘„or ed ;:.)J"• E1 I C2 •31_:--': t k re.1 t. it.0 r. REM CITY OF RE TON HEARING ExA INER MAR 2 91977 PM 7.819"11,121 1 o2 3.49516 1.1• ar. i EXHIBIT NO. C ITEM NO. W-e ? - • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 29 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE: GERALD E. SCHNEIDER REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-028-77 F. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The subject site has a generally irregu- lar topography with several knolls and valleys throughout. 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC ) . Permeability is moderately rapid in surface layer and very slow in the sub- strata . Runoff is slow to medium, and hazard of erosion is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture , and for urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The site consists of brush and scrub grass ground cover, together with various sizes of Douglas Fir trees scattered throughout the site . 4 . Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: Surface water and streams are not apparent on the site . 6 . Land Use: The subject site is presently undevel - oped . However, it surrounds two exist- ing single family residences located adjacent to Monroe Ave . N . E . Existing single family residential uses are located directly north and east of the subject site . The area south of the subject site consists of undeveloped property and various commercial uses . The Renton Vocational School is located west of the subject site across from Monroe Ave. N . E . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area consists of a mixture of platted and sparsely developed single family residences , together with certain amounts of unde- veloped land and commercial uses . The subject site is within a transitional area from the business uses and zoning along N . E .4th St . to the single family residential community along andnorthofN. E. 6th St . Careful consideration must be given in creating a reasonable and compatible transition in development intensity. G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer: Existing in the area are a 10" water main along Monroe Ave . N. E . , a 8" sewer main along Monroe Ave . N . E . , and a 12" storm sewer along N. E . 4th St . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirement. Any further development of the site will be subject to City of Renton standards . 3. Transit: Metro Route No . 242 operates along N . E . 7th St . approximately 1/4 mile north of the subject site . 4 . Schools : The subject site is within 1/2 mile of Highlands Elementary School , within one mile of McKnight Junior High School , and within two miles of Hazen High School . CITY OF RENTON REE VED KANT EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT Am MAR 2 1971 PM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER 71819110.1112111213141516 PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 29 , 1977 7T,U APPLICANT: GERALD E. SCHNEIDER ITEM NO. u" 2'7 FILE NO: R-028-77 , REZONE FROM GS- 1 AND S- 1 TO R-2 AND R-3 A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests rezone from GS- 1 and S- 1 to R-2 and R-3 to allow development of low to medium density multi -family housing . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : GERALD E . SCHNEIDER FLORA E . McKENNEY 2. Applicant: GERALD E. SCHNEIDER 3 . Location : Approximately 600 ' north of N . E . 4th St . on Monroe Ave . N . E . 4 . Legal Description : Detailed legal description available on file in the Renton Planning Depart- ment. 5 . Size of Property : Approximately 14 acres . 6 . Access : Monroe Ave . N . E . and N . E . 6th St. 7 . Existing Zone : GS- 1 and S- 1 . 8 . Existing Zoning GS- 1 , S- 1 , R- 1 , and B- 1 . in Area : 9 . Comprehensive Medium Density Multiple Family on the Land Use Plan : southerly 350 ' of the subject site and single family residential on the northern portion of the subject site . 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing ' of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chron- icle and posted in six places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Subject rezone to R-2 and R-3 classifications is to permit future multiple family residential development on the site . D, HISTORY/BACKGROUND: An application for rezone to R-3 of a portion of the subject site was submitted on February 5 , 1975 . A revised application to R-2 zoning was approved by the Planning Commission on March 26 , 1975 . However, a group of area residents opposed the subject rezone and appealed the decision to the City Council . The applicant with- drew his application for R-2 zoning on May 12 , 1975 . No further action on the subject site has transpired since this previous rezone request . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC MEETING OF MARCH 29 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : GERALD E . SCHNEIDER REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-028-77 O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed rezone does not agree with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan within the northerly 200-300 feet o.f the subject site . The Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates single family residential land use extending approximately 300-350 feet south of the centerline of N . E . 6th St. The southerly 330 feet of the subject site is indicated as medium density multiple family residential on the Com- prehensive Land Use Plan . 2 . Existing single family residences are located directly adja- cent to the northerly boundary of the subject property and immediately north of N . E . 6th St . Compatibility with the existing single family uses will be of primary importance , when considering the subject rezone request . Compatibility can be provided through various methods , including : less intensive residential zoning and land uses near the existing single family area , height controls , additional setbacks , access controls , greenbelt/buffer areas , screening , develop- ment as a P. U . D. , and progressive reduction in densities i . e . , the creation of transition zones ) . A combination of all of these methods may be necessary for the subject proposal . 3 . The same general site was considered for R-2 zoning in March , 1975 , and created much citizen opposition from the surrounding community. The rezone request was withdrawn in May, 1975 . 4 . There is an existing half-street (Olympia Ave . N . E . ) , which extends into the northern portion of the subject site from N . E . 6th St. Access from a multiple family complex onto the existing single family residential street will impact the existing residential area . Access controls will be necessary. Also, the southerly 30eet of N . E . 6th St . , adjacent to the subject site , has,\been dedi - cated and improved . 5 . The Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates multiple family residential area adjacent to the existing business zoningtothesouth . However , there is also a need to determine how much multiple family is desirable , the relative density ,the proper transition to single family uses to the north , and the character and quality of the eventual site develop- ment. Pa PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of R-3 zoning for the southerly 330 feet ofthesubjectsiteandR-1 zoning on the remainder of the site subject to the following conditions to be established as restrictive covenants running with the land : 1 . DEVELOPMENT Any and all development of the subject property shall be subject to City of Renton approval and shall comply withalltherequirementsofthe. Planned Unit Development Ordi - nance , Chapter 27 , Title IV , (Building Regulations ) of Ordinance 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton . " A master development plan for the entire property as described above shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Renton pursuant to the abovemen- tioned ordinance prior to preparation of specific develop-ment plans . PLANNIN.G DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC MEETING OF MARCH 29 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : GERALD E . SCHNEIDER REZONE APPLICATION NO . R-028-77 5 . Parks : In addition to the vocational school grounds , Kiwanis Park is approximately one-half mile from the subject site . H', APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-725 , Amendments 2 . 4-729 , G , General Classification District 3 . 4-707, S- 1 , •Suburban Residence District 4. 4-706 , R- 1 , Residence Single Family 5 . 4-708 , R-2, Residence District 6 . 4-709A, R-3 , Residence District I . APPLICABLE SECTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Objectives , pages 17 and 18, numbers 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , and 6 . 2 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , pages 9 and 10 , Summary. 3 . Chapter 30 , Land Use Hearing Examiner, Section 4-3010B and Section 4-3014. J . IMPACT ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: Rezoning of the subject property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems . However , eventual development may requitedisturbanceofsoilandve9etation .through grading and cuttingandfilling, increasing storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: . Certain additional social interaction will be created through eventual development of the site . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the sub- ject proposal (see attached ) . However , actual development of the site will require further environmental review. M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A vicinity map and site map are attached . N, AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Engineering Division 2 . City of Renton Utilities Division 3 . City of Renton Building Division 4 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department The above departments approved the applications . Copies of memos from certain departments are attached . INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date March 14, 1977 TO: Planning Department FROM:Engineering SUBJECT: Rezone: Gerald E. Schneider All offsite improvements will be required together with storm retention at the time of development. This includes extension of water, sewer and storm plus curb and gutter, side- walks and street paving. RC H:pmp i `,l, PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC MEETING OF MARCH 29 , 1977. PAGE FIVE RE : ' GERALD, E . SCHNEIDER REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-028-77 2 . BUILDING HEIGHT No building or structure shall exceed a height of thirty- five ( 35 ) feet. 3 . DENSITY The maximum density within said southerly 330 feet shall not exceed 20 units per acre. 4 . GREENBELT/BUFFER A minimum 50 foot landscaped buffer area suitable for screen- ing purposes shall be established between the multiple family residential area and the single family residential area nd between ' the subject site and existing developed single family residential property. Said buffer areas shall be included in a detailed landscape plan for the total site development subject to Planning Department approval at the time of development plan review. 5 . ACCESS Access from any 'multiple family development shall not be per- mitted onto N . E. 6th Street. 6 . DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY The northerly 30 feet of the westerly 630 feet of the subject site shall be dedicated to the City and improved to City requirements at the time of development of the subject property. 7 . SETBACKS No building or structure shall be located closer than 50 feet to any existing developed single family residential lot . 8. DURATION These co,uenants shall run with the land and expire on Degem- ber 31 , 2050. It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that if a master plan for total development Of the property is not submitted to the City of Renton pursUant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance within two 2) years and substantial construction begun within three (3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter , the zoning of said property shall . without further City action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document , and these restrictive covenants shall become null and void . The term substantial construction" shall mean the physical altera- tion of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the abovementioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance and a valid building permit , or 'con- struction of required utilities for such development . The abovementioned time periods may be extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and approval by the Renton Planning„Department. Such reasonable cause shall include , but may hot be limited to , the requirement of an environmeental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 . The above recommendation is consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan for the area . It is also considered rea- sonable in that it attempts to establish a progressive transi - tion area from the business uses and zoning along N . E . 401 St . to the single family residential community north along N . E . 6th St . The recommended zoning pattern and conditions will ensure compatibility with the single family residential area , while the requirement for P . U. D . type development will allow flexibility and created a smooth transition in density and character of development. r• • o jbe VI;' PUBLIC. WORKS DEPARTMENT A TRAFFIC. ENGINEERING DIVISION • 235-2620 3 4cv MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WA. 98055 4 ' 0 SEPIV.: 6 • • CHARLES‘J. DELAURENTI MAYOR MEM 0:RANDUM March 15, 1977 TO: Planning Department , FROM: Traffic Engineering Division SUBJECT: Gerald E. Schneider Rezone No Significant, Impact CEM:ad OF R 1 THE CITY OF RENTON L :;: :_:: z' - CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR l..'>. ID 0 FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS 0. p v MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVE. S. •, RENTON WA. 98055 • 235 2.42qlFoSEPI 1.7 CHIEF. GEORGE H.WlILIAMS ASST.CHIEF:DICK GEISS ER March 15 , 1977 TO: Planning Department FiJJM: Fire Department SUBJECT : Gerald E. Schneider Rezone No objection to rezone. R G:bm l‘c.. RP til PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION 235 - 2540 SPA s MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055o, Qgrfo SEPitw- March 10, 1977 CHARLES J: DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Jim Hanson SUBJECT: Gerald Schneider Rezone We have no objections to the rezone as proposed. f) JCH/mp I V r-,' ; .i,tir.t.i.i., -.74,-1. :;,:, , 7+,•;:1 ::_ 4 1 t 4. '...• 1 : 1,..,i.„?,,„[,,,!x•,::-...., 0 1 ,....: 1 7, . .,1,•!..7.. ,...L 0 t:• _4_ .. . , .,4A .f.,.!'77:!"-,, ,,,,. 1. -- . ' 4 " F::,-,.J. it. I' :.il : , „... '! '8 • • ... . i- •• 4411.• ,,.. . .,-.-. A- - . T--3 ,iit,,,,,•0,, z t+.• • .4. .. i i•0 NN\ VIIIPIPIRMIN SR-I 1 . -7.T1.: .: ;lire._ _, w, cte , orila .. _.t. A G SH11 cii 0 " 1 1 : 4 • ..<. 4. a 31 r 4r1 • SitiLlmci-SIM ' • n ' . r‘ 3\ v1. t .,Y• '';.. ''; y. . x• , . ..; ,•• i L......mi.j 111.IF( f I F*1 , 1..•14: \Ls, N*.' I h , t I 7771 ;, : I r • 11, . 0%,.:,,. . 4.,/ i , .. ( I 1i P ',. 't C.',/ V- , a I ' Lel 'II.' .1: 41 - - ''' ; 2C T ' : ' : B- ,Izo i I 4' .i,'. .. • I • . •'' -'-Itv i_____J w B1 ' '.. — L..-"1-...L .'1 i Gs 4. . Li, GRgENWPOD 1 i ! iCEMET-LRY . 1 , I. I ' 0,' , jr.... C I 0 , I JI ' I 1. I1 -j 1 I I.I t - • 1 A • i , 10N-.1 I1,11111.!......1.111,01”.•••11•11•11-1M•M•7. 4-11111.0- 11ETON . CITY LIMITS. i--q-7•11., ..T,', -.. 1_ 7._,:iiiIllinini:. \I ' i 3,i ' 1 *1 ft„ * ...•'•' • ki.'I\4 '',,„ \ I i:::, t :',..' . ' '-'9 ,..',.,\', k,'t."•• " 'tI I j?::•. !•' ,T .. :1'1:.;.\.s.'.-'sf,.--%.' ' •'... ' I I I 1 I: i. 121 r.,A 0.0 , \ :,- L,/ .4.1.,,.....• • ‘1 -- .,;.--.„!..--- .,. 1 p'• • •', • . , , '1 ,, „,?-'' . , • 1 L,B-I, 16.11.- 1•••6._ 1". '.;11..Z*'''1'.'1; REZONE : GERALD E . SCHNEIDER ; Appl . No . R-028-77 ; rezone from GS-1 and S- 1 to R-2 and 'R-3 ; ' property located on- Monroe Avenue. N . E . between . N . E .', 6.th •Street and N . E . 4th Street D E. SCHNEIDER TOTAL AREA ±14. acresAPPLICANTGERALD. PRINCIPAL ACCESS Monroe Avenue N . E . EXIS1ING ZONING GS-1 and S-1 Single-family residential EXISTING USE unimproved property Development of town houses under PUD,Ordinance , PROPOSEO - US'e Approximate density 120: - 14Q 'knits . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family and Medium Density Multi -Family. COMMENTS I i ccetc- •oN .04"W-l ageIst II"* .1 c1v 1 -J 7r1eelb MIR%*1/Onati* t& 1 1 i 1 r 1 ; Ill I 1 I I r—, I I i Q ; ! it I. . ' 11 tvooi^ { I I t I t 90 i i1DMA/ I `I L.J I: 09 I tea IJos1'Walt 1 I. jgM+tpYaN a4 r rd ou-14 f- r 100' S. I l..1 7lN0 ll t. I 401-Ili 1 i" I: II fII1 I .,,+ I t 1: I oi' 1t 1 I•0 I/ fi 3 MJ 1 j.s i 1 o 1 004A044iii43 r --r7 --1 1 1 9+ t+s tItAi2 l 1ml, ape.*i` .ya 1 1 1TB43aloz 5 4 $any 6•tJr ? 4ki." 1414 • is, a we0aagir 4 I•N ' Q fir Ito ON 1 z o c9*I1WSNld*fill jell tivd (ohms 1 4IVP ;)V i)F (13 i fit I I .04 a I IL7bL30cOa6elaar3o ep® n 0 n[ C7 Q 0 l I• 1e KO 14' II 1 o0a o 1O 3 c3a r OD 0 0 Q o l 1 1 1 o. 0 l- 4 n a 05 inn I 1Oa0O O Q D D 116004. , - a 00010C g0 n Q ® I 11 PROPOSED/FINAL DE...ARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/N___ SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-028-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-219-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant requests rezone from GS- 1 and S- 1 to R-2 and R-3 to allow development of low to medium density multi -family housing . Proponent GERALD E. SCHNEIDER Approximately 600 ' north of N . E . 4th St . Location of Proposal on Monroe Avenue N . E . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to [] have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS [] is Ellis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030(2 ) (c ) . This decision was midi after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Pl nin 9Dire or Date March 22 , 1977 Signature E City of • Renton Planning Department 5-76 RECEIVED o MAR 1 197;CITY OF RENTON REZONE APPLICATION N DEP PR•S For Office Use Only: APPL. NO. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION o?ei o $-5-9- FEE; RECEIPT NO. APPEAL FILED, FILING DATE 77 CITY COUNCIL ACTION HEARING DATE ..-2 9- y7 ORDINANCE NO. & DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1. Name Gerald E. Schneider phone 243-5578 2. Address 665 Standler Blvd. , Seattle, Washington 98188 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Monroe Ave. between 6th and 4th ST. 4 . Square footage or acreage of property approx. 14 acres. 5. Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach separate sheet) See Attachment 6 . Existing zoning GS 1 and S-1 Zoning Requested R-2 & R-3 See Vicinity Map)NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. Low to Medium Density Multi-Family Housing. 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? Immediately - provided the financing is available 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. s r A;•I ID/111IT I,, Gerald. E. Schneider being duly sworn , declare that I am the owner. •of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knouiledge and belief . Subscribed and, ,sworn ,before me this 1 SF day of , 19 7 7., Notary Public in and or the State of; . I) Washington , :.res;i•dinc at / 73-24;61.6 - T ._:,,, (.--772,),e7., iT e .;,o,f. .No"ca,cy90ubl.ic ! ignat;ure, of , l wne!_r „ . S / .S .fi .s/ r E 9Ad l Address) Address, Seattle Wagh. City )State ) 24 3-55?B Telephone ) F OR ' OPF- ILE USE ONLY ) 1.:ERTIF- ICATIUN - This is to certify that the foregoing application has• been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Henton, Planninn Department governing the_.filing_..:•of such application . ' L.:. OF RFDateReceivedc- PI o 1- MAR 1 1977 Renton Planning, Dept. 2' 4G DEPPR' AFFIDAVIT I, Ylova E. 'rlcKenney being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me i2 this / - day of 19-77 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at 39.,7-,L. 2t- Name of Iotary Public) Signature of Owner) Address) r Address) Se/a 4.211sY City) State) Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department th filing of such app t•lo i f Vim, 1+3L11UII By#® k\\-ts MAR 1 1977 Renton Planning Dept . M/i4V DF1'A 2-73 r • - LEGAL DESCRIPTION : All in Section, 9_, Township 23 N . 1 Ranee- 5 E . W. M. 1. North of the Northwest 4: of the Southwest i less _ South 130 feet of the west 230 feet less County road less coal and mineral rights. 2. North * * of South 4 of Northwest J;- of Southwest i of South- east If, Except latest 184 feet of North 89. 70 feet. 3. South 4 of South -1 of Northwest of Southwest a: of South- east i, Except road. . 4 : latest 525 feet of North x of Northeast k of Southwest a of Southeast a, Except roads, and Except North 130 feet. 5. !Test 460 feet of South * of Northeast ;',- of Southwest 4 of Southeast *, Except roads. See Attachment ) igNEb o4_. MAR 1 1977 r1moilii)- ....:-: lit, L 0 1• t, ; Ni ArW © T room_ wFAIM> WO A loa r' nomN.E Z TQ megm'Prilg 'low; pois.,•---- id 7----'-' : •i ' . ' I : ' ' ding filml13 Ail, ilkw' , i k, Q i.y.. } .j..r. + t Q Qomarts,owls_ 13 N.E. . T O i ; I ' 1 1. i.. Qs N e QO Oak Walittg atell2N1>iliagIIsofrIrz ,3 i. WM w VAC_. 4 I 1up it a1 ra 4 drt `' u r©11i. N..E. I I S ‘ .zElt gigf15IP0, tee. inign- iJ III WI ileaZCr/l• El EleeZriEU pp' N E 6- • PL IC n J. 1b 1. .11e 1 . j. Ill14 PI'%WI 1® 14 le al 12 to 7 0 : I• II%Ia gO• I Ily NIIEI Y ' ",lS b`7 .1 % I I I 1 I° I PUBLIC Mil 41103 1 7.1 IJ 1_. 9 use sa•. :lifi y J AC. diji C). I I 0' 1 I todisepp-. 411 I 1 A 1 1 I 1P d rn JPL I I I 1 I 1 A I I + 411! ST. 47...„? o'r,. ) 1 s A F z -e ° i. I I ' 1 v/ G7 R E N do D. I I ; M E.T E YREC, I1IEDl ° MAR. 1 1` I I 0/ GDE y! • 0 I 1 • 1 i--- __u,, Y- 'il' yam lr.l.. r,.,7 1: 1---4:.v,,,i '..-=,:s:ti4•p+.,:-i`,w(,o,,,,-,, i4j:7C:4 ;?c .. ,_^ 1 ua.;,:. p,p t'V. /d?,,1 rIWAIi c yi'A `r.i Y 1"r.; ...` _?Y'.:,. ``":'i,x.k`.-P:'. ,ty-=-, f' .titib- ,}U•4v'476.:y 88 jj o.• r '[([fir., >'_ :s, ,. ' ;en a Inil0, , - • 1/, a-r. 0 11 1.pF TM i -ea,I'.va,-cr. Jt°... ','{T.,,;._,;_,,,, j nn- " P Q, i a I ar,: 'p ' H `'',,, ,g „` .`vr',.i} :, *•-11-e--. 1,...;-,:,i-v.;{ a S t s ' a; .E ,a r sci r! Vt;• ;; .,:: r 4 (: E?.• . He n. v, 1 t:,..... ,::-lla . ,, f .rs `; ,. r_f?•'.:.e, r l All 0 ea 1\1•1r r' 7.-- iI !c::4I r., . IMumF'41+i.1A,_1A , Ol.• ., ,Ex• cf•I'• 't 1 , LIP*4 f 4.•.., , b, eu9 r Y,ie' E, dtl49Mama-TO- ., 10 4 1111 fie 0—_ Nr, , L r 4 "'0, ' ;V • ) •E9 as 'A .1 :04 `. S,( 6 ' 4 p.. 1• 1'"1 :;+r!:t'• r'`i 1:. ea qq f r l 1 =1 i .` ne• Q i r 8 E , r, fr 1T I • R1.61. 4111111 '4 eD s 9 E I.. ;i' ri- :. ;, . .-,liw 1--- .. lila mi, 4 n h:! t 1 r • 4 i e A ' i 1 w 3 o f Ems' e>i i, cq= a N ii,0AIMitIe v a L ` a a, O a t o AO Q i._3 ° ).. . Ya Y.a ,p r'° F7 t t"' J f— P , t'J rti a 4 i9 4 . l i11811 l'L)Gt1' s,.i 1 rY s r r II a i._)10: 1 t E 6 . S) Ti:,'. c A -1, • t.Z.t2di,PW C1 •,;, .4,, a. J C3 4 :'°II 9 0(.- - oarae t ai V J:'M. n. 0,Do15, ' L >_ ..,. . 9 a..„), '1'g aB Q'7.'..:113II._42/a v p to-:i' , E( Ego g 6 v O C a I ' a K— 3)2 ef\,a,.afy•J'4c-0 ' • ' 17- Viiiii It:P, I 0, 1 ikon VAC u s Id I m _ 1 1 moo, E.I W bt:),. • -..' ny 1 I lizzecraca GTE REj 1.-,,,,,s-NAE.-.-T . ist.y . . ,. . , i MAR .1 1977 2,,/1 c,A"---ri; --. fro N- HOC T 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , includinganyotherinformationneededtogiveanaccurateunderstandingoftheenviron- mental setting of the proposal ) : Monroe Avenue between 6th street and 4th StrPpJ-_ oprox. 14 acres of unimproved ground. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : N/A 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone - Action - Building and Utility Permits for the City of Renton. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain : No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Same as #9 II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X YES MAYBE NO b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? YES MAYBIE ND d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X_ YESM YBE NO e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? X Y S MAYBE NO. f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES RATITE N )- Explanation: A road and building sites will be cleared, graded, f-i11 d and compacted where required for proper grade tran- sition, drainages and foundation stability. (e) Before landscaping, there will be an increase in erosion of dis= Curbed areas, but this will be of a temporary nature. 0 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON n ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM k. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY yj DEP IF Application No. J7 Environmental Checklist No. .CC°`% - .v/9- '% PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance O Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be . prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality, of the environment. . The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next, question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Gerald E. Schneider 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 665 Standler Blvd. Seattle, Washington 98188 243—5 57 8 3. Date Checklist submitted February 12, 1977 4. Agency requiring Checklist. City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: M" Street Rezone 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Proponent's 1ln_tent is to rezone the North 460 Feet of the subject site to R-3 (Medium Density Multi—Family) and the remaining Northern portion of the subject site to R-2 (Low Density Multi—Family) upon completion of the rezone submit subject site as a PUD for the development of Townhouses. Approx. density 120 - 140 units. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers ofo any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a &Reduction of wildlife habitat will result in small animal displacement to adjoining areas. 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The use of heavy equipment in site preparation and construction phase will result in a temporary increases in noise levels during normal working hours. 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE WO-- Explanation: An increase in light ana glare from street lights, home and auto lights may hp antiripafed_ 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X_ YES RATITE NO Explanation: North one-fourth of the subject site is outside of the Multi-Family designation in the comprehensive plan of Renton. The use will change from non-use to residential use. 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • Land and building materials will be committed to this project 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions?X_ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES MAYBE N Explanation:The completed project will house about 384 people in a low growth area. 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? MAYESMAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: . a) A temporary increase in exhaust and dust. Emissions during. construction will occur and upon completion an increase in vehicular exhaust emission. 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) . Changes in currents , or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES M YBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE N- f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances 'into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE Explanation: (b) Increased runo om_ impervirms Aurf r.pq will be collected, and converted to the existing storm sewer system at Monroe Ave,(e,h) Pollutants from paved (continue below) 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? 4'S MAYBE ff b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? DES' MMAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NG d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) Although, existing flora will be retained where possible, much of the site will be cleared. Supplemental landscaping will be completed during the construction phase. 3 (e,h)-areas (including some oil, grease, fuels, inoxgarlic s, organic residues, debris etc. ) may be suspended or dissolved in surface runoff, but drainage collection and t'he incorporation of an oil separater will help control pollution from this source. 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE N f) Solid waste and disposal? X_ YES MAYBE NO Explanation:The proposed plat will require the extension of existing systems only. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: T 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: None Known. III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. f,.Proponent : ra f 1'tr. r. rZ signed name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The project will upgrade the existing neighborhood to the North and East. The property to the South is unimproved and zoned business. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES M YBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YE M YBE NOS d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? 1E' MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians?' X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) Additional traffic will be generated from the project onto Monroe Ave. (2 lane, paved, gravel shoulders) . The intersection of Monroe Ave. & 4th ST. will be signalized within the year for the King County Shop Complex. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? X YES M YBE NO b) Police, protection?X YES MAYBE NO c) Schools?X YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE 0- f) Other governmental services?x7 YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Additional housing creates a demand for_ services wherentiver h i- r.- -•> 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need, for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO c) '.Water? YES MAYBE NO NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 29 1977 , AT 9 :00 A.M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . REZONE FROM GS- 1 AND S- 1 TO R-2 AND R-3 ; file No . R-028-77 ; property located on Monroe Ave . N . E . between N . E . 6th St . and N . E . 4th St . 2 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-031-77 ; property located on West Valley Highway between S . W. 43rd and S . W. 41st. 3. SITE . APPROVAL IN B- 1 ZONE ; file No . SA-032-77 ; property located between Shattuck Ave . S . and Whitworth Ave . S . immediately north of Houser Way S . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 29 , 1977 AT 9 :00 A .M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED PLANNING DIRECTOR UBLISHED March 18, 1977 CERTIFICATION I , Michael L . Smith HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 15th day of March 19 11 . SIGNED' .r-cGeei...: A 41-THE CITY OF RENTONIa}- 2 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 4 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • . PLANNING DEPARTNIENTO, Q4T` D SE1® 235-2550 March 9 , 1977 Gerald E. Schneider 665 Standler Blvd. Seattle, WA 98188 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR GERALD E. SCHNEIDER: REZONE FROM GS-1 & S-1 TO R-2 & R-3 Ge'tlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted theabovementionedapplicationonMarch7, 1977 Apu:lic hearing before the City of Renton Hearing ExaminerhasbeensetforMarch29, 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre-se -t . All interested persons are invited to attend thehe=rinc . If you have any further questions , please calltheRentonPlanningDepartment , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director By : Mi ael L . Smit Associate Planner wr I INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST TO : PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR l< BUILDING DIVISION V NGINEERING DIVISIO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION i/ UTILITIES DIVISION V IRE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT M t S , fi1 Contact Person R E : qe,v21.14 Sr_1/114Gm y - r'G eAt -geowt 46-I I S-1 40 F-2 # te.- Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by 3//S/99 with your written recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner. Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTME 1(14.° Date 3 7 7? INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date March 14, 1977 TO: Planning Department FROM:Engineering SUBJECT: Rezone: Gerald E. Schneider All offsite improvements will be required together with storm retention at the time of development. This includes extension of water, sewer and storm plus curb and gutter, side- walks and street paving. A / f RCH:pmp f) ING DFF'ti , ' v_ 4' Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C z a TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION • 235-2620 o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WA. 98055O COf SEPS lsO CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR MEMORANDUM March 15, 1977 TO: Planning Department FROM: Traffic Engineering Division SUBJECT: Gerald E. Schneider Rezone No Significant Impact. CEM:ad 4 OV v 4 41 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Q t%4L___) BUILDING DIVISION 235 -25402maE?MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 980551:1 0 ft° SE Pit March 10, 1977 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR TO: Planning Department FROM: Jim Hanson SUBJECT: Gerald Schneider Rezone We have no objections to the rezone as proposed. r7 JCH/mp r1PEC \D1 Lti 4/. S. Of Rat THE CITY OF RENTON CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYORCo7. co. FIRE DEPARTMENT HEADQUARTERS oA., fO $EP twO MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVE. S. • RENTON WA. 98055 • 235 2642 CHIEF: GEORGE H.WILLIAMS ASST.CHIEF:DICK GEISSLER March 15 , 1977 TO: Planning Department FROM: Fire. Department SUBJECT: Gerald E. Schneider Rezone No objection to rezone. RG:bm