Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA77-101f. CITY '-OF RENTON REZ.ONE APPLICATION . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. ir-/D/ - 77 EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE $ APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO. CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE 1-77 OR P ' IXCR +' AND DATE HEARING DATE nE E IED YY,' o APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 $NOV 14 1977 d 1 . Na e Dean W. Bitney..Ph ,•:1 255-1080 Address 108 Factory Avenue North. Rento'NIN _= -.P on 98055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Union Avenue Southeast between Northeast .4th Street and M= •le Valley Golf Course 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 104,680 S.F. = 2.403 acres 5 . Legal description of property (if' more space is required, attach a separate sheet) ' See Exhibit A 6 . - Existing Zoning General Use (G) Zoning Requested Trailer Park (T) Comprehensive Plan shows area as single family land use. NOTE TO; APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate . 7. Proposed use of site Construction of home ,sites (lots) for double-and ' triple-wide mobile. homes; quality housing at a reasonable cost. (Approxi- . mate density 6 UPA. ) 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. a)iRetained specimen fir trees and, where possible, a natural vegetation buffer strip. (b) Replanted cleared areas. (c) Installed a solid-barrier Concrete fence. (d) Constructed a storm drainage system. (e) Employed a security service to control bikers and R.V. 's. 9 . HoW soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? ImtiMediately. 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77'- . I ' CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON F R i, ., ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM . ' 4' l' V RECEIVED o i . NOV 14 19-n- FOR-oFF CE"'UStE 1AL'I x . .. q . 44 Application" No.D% . .7ry- DEPP Environmental •C!hecklit No`- -,. I'.: /:_.. 9 . ,,; 1: ., t- PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: D Declaration of Significance O Declaration of Significance' Declaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance ry.. t.. Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires a:lJ st,a;te and _loc,al governmental -agencies , to c:ons.tder env.ir.onme,ntal .:va.l,ues bot.tl for their own actions and When 'licensi'ng pri' ate proposa'15 . The -Act•-al'so requires that' an E'IS be prepared,;fo,ra11 major,.,actiops si gni,ficantly; affecting; he ;,q,Iia];i;-ty',o.f th-een.vironment. ' , The purpose' of th'.t's- checklist is to help the agencies invol'Ved -determine Whether or not a proposal is such a major 'action. Please answer. the following .questions as completely as you can with the information presently •available to you. Where explanations of your.answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your expl'an'ation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help. all agencies involved with your' proposal to undertake the required environmental - review with- out unnecessary '.delay. Th,e following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for .which approval is sought.: Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even. tho:ugh completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all. of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the' State ' of Washington for various types of proposals . Many' of the questions may' not apply to• your proposal . .If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue' on to. the next question. '; • ` ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I .; 'BACKGROUND 1 . Name of .,Proponent Dean_W. Bitn,q 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 108_Factory Avenue North,._Renton,_Wash .ngtQn 98055• 206) 255-1080 --=-------- 3.. Date Checklist submitted November q,_.,977 4. Agency requiring Checklist _City_of_Renton (Department of Planning) 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Leisure Estates West Annex (201 Union Avenue Southeast) 6. ' Nature and brief description of the proposal ('including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will .give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) :, The applicant proposes_t_construct servicing,. i-.e. , sewer_and water, to 2 paresis. (norh_side ^'2 ,520' S..F•. and south side J 81 ;•160 .S.F-.) separated by the Leisure-Estates' entrance street and :install resident il4 heusingi'in theirterla- OP'mobile homes double .and triple-wide units.)' on said'=parcels see'. zoning exhibit. . - 27. . 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well As the extent of the land area affected by any 'environmental. impacts , including I :. any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- . mental setting of the proposal ) : . Property located along the entrance to Leisure Estates, an adult rental Mobile Home Park. Sewer, water and drainage lines exist in the entrance street. . Selective clearing Of the property has been performed, retaining the specimen fir trees. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : ' .- July, 1978 , 9 List of all permits , licenses or government, approvals required for the proposal - federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone •and site plan_anrovaL - _Cinty_of Renton_Departmenti_of Planning Servicing approval ..! CityLof Renton_DepartMentof Public Works , 1. . Do you have. any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to. or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:- Yes, there ere .plens pr_expension_of_tbs_parkLto the north onto property owned by the applicant. :(See rezone_eppligationA . 1 .: .'DO:lidu know of any' Plans by -others which may 'offect the property covered by. :, yOur-Oriopd'sal ? If 'yes; explain.: • . No . - . .A ', • .. . 1 , • Attach any other 'application form that has been completed regarding the pro- • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date; describe the nature of such application form: II .. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanationi of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are yequired) WillEarth. the proposal result, in a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructUres? WE .YES I NO b) Disruptions , displacements , 'compaction or over- tov.prih9 ..of...the.-So,i 1?;,.,-.-) ! ,--.. , . ,„ . YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ' • X YES. • MAYBE NO d) The des.truction, 'c'overihg o'Y modification of any , : 140,que,....geolpgi,cor ,physical features? . YE TIME tit 1 •(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , her on OT .off.th : :site?. % -• YES ' MAYBE NO 4f). Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which • • may modify the channel of a river or stream or the- bed -oftheoceah .cir any.-bay, inlet or .lake?, : X Ta' MAYBE . NO Explahation: (b) A limited amount of _grading will -be required for street and. pad. the homes. con- tours- ,to :further minimize. grading: (e-) Removed natural vegetation will- b,e replacectovj.th man-pl,anted`:vegetation and iaperviotu3 surfaces; during the construction period, soil erosion might. be_expected. 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO b) The creation of objectionable odors? yt v- MAYBE N'U c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (a) Approximately 12 to 18 vehicles will be associated with the Mobile' Home Park expansion and will contribute CO, NO and SO4 emissions found in the ambient air. Temporary deterioration will occur duriri nstruction due o_ dust and smoke rom burning. The impact onity_,. however• .W41 .be ins ign icant. 3) Water. Will the proposal result, •inr a) ,;:Chan:gers._"in :currents., .or.:.the' course af.....dir.ection of '' n,` e.ith.er,.:m•ar.,ine or::fresh..waters?._1 . Y.ES ,-:'MAYBE. NO b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X TES— MAYBE NO c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO CO Change in the amount of surface water in any water iPOY;? 4 X• .. - . YE.S;. . .MAYBE NO e) . Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X t._'.._ •' L ; . • YES MAYBE N f) .Alteration._'of the direction or:'rate• of;flow .of . • ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either ' through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through , di.r,ec.t in ec'•tion , o.r... throu. h the seepage of leachate, . phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria., or_ other substances into-.the ground waters? X YES M YBE NO i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for' public water supplies? X YES MAYBE rib— Explanation: (b, d & e) Grading and impervious surfaces created will change absorption rates on approximately 80% of the property. Storm water'.runoff .is; controlled in_this area. bymeans. of: storm drainage i h,t,_ tlj,es":. directed: to: detention• facilities at the northwest tprner4=)" , F1 :, will the proposed result. in;; ., See below a) Change in-the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including. trees, shrubs; grass, crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? S MAYBE NO b) . Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? ' X YET- MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE•W d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural ,,c.rop? Yam- MAYBE NO Explanation: (a Most of the vegetation onthist property hassmbeen remove eaturalfnufrerstagocalaa accent®pro erty sines. ventually, ally the • Lear d areas w - l bb e e p lanced" i•r ra s and/or decorative shrn a r s : ;. a Ienna4aping:o :Fagentr-ance-atreet as aready been,.:aecompliehed. c of the existing Mobile Home Park. Some siltation/pollution of the storm waters is unavoidable; the detention facilities existing on the site will mitigate this impact. 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes ' in the diversity of species , or numbers. of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthi.c organisms , insects or microfauna)? • YES M YBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species .of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO c). ' Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement. Xoffauna?. YES MAYBE NO d)` 'Deterioration1 to 'existing fish or wildlife habitat?: L Y ES M,VBE N0- E xp l l i o n: (a - A mraximatelyy of the existing. wildlife habitats, native ° s. d •b rds will be eliminated or modified as I:1es= or tee potential development. mestic t c ect d h th s t o f dev lopment andDomestic to expected rebuilding or natural species. d) The exist wildlife habitat"will be unavoidably deteriorated on the groper 6) . Noise. —Will the proposal., increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Construction (short-term) noise levels will be inter- . mittently high due to the use of heavy equipment. ' Ambient noise levels w ease .4ue tQ daily_residentihl traffic estimated at:' a pDroximately jQtripDs. 7) ,Ligrvt' .and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? ' YES MBE NO E x pa a n a.t i o n: . Mobile home__y `4i._,eI ._attest_lighting'and automobile headlights will be _the_prmary source of new light glue. 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in .the alteration of .the. present or planned land use of an area?_ . ' YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposed development'_is consistent with the compre- hensive plaAeeigneted_leni uae_-(8ingie family).-_and._compatible with`:.the existing_Mobile Home Park._.__ ;" . ___.^__._._- 9) Natural Resources.. Will the proposal res.ult' in : ' ' a) . Increase in the rate of use. of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO . b) .-. 40;gt'i•,0n. of any, nonrenewah_le• natur'al.. resource? , -- X YES MAYBE NO E x l a n a t i on: The use of eleectrriccity,.._n t_ural_ga oil etc. for home11, ti, ea •: and: coil etc-. wlill_1l linevitably result in the 9 IA 11 ion and i : • :ticn_of natur res©urrea • Such c.jption w occ ess of is' deyyel o©te e t ti the demandhousinghofRenton ;g11d_ Kifig county has bean uA-Hailed. 10) Risk of Upset.- Does: the proposal involve. a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but"no:t limited to, 'oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or. upset conditions? Y - M YBE NO Explanation: N.A. 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri bution, density, or growth rate of the human population i . .:of,:. an, area?. X_ YES . MAYBE NS i=on: The - -_ Ex lanat to osed develo meatt w 1 hav a PA) y er .a- e e . y tte • n ad c n ert/es no pop . a _ on van be expected to .accelerate the .growthCofl_ethisra> a. 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or . ' create a demand for additional housing? 'X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposed development will provide adult housing ' at .an attainable cost, which is' presently in short supply. 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a):'•-` Ge'nerat'io'n•'of'additio41-"we it icul•ar' movement? .. •X YES„ MAYBE NO 4,---;(b)L.-Effects on ekisttng-park_'ni-faeil-it'fes, 'ir''demand . for•-. new parking? a-`:'s. . .J,. Ter` MAYBE N O ' c) I.mp'act -upon- existing transportatio'n;`s-ystems? X • IT MAYBE tT " s, .( d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES WPM— NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?, X I- Y-! MAYBE NO' f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X i YES' B NO" Ex lanation: (a) App oO 4Q- 8v@r dai yehiCle i (C Due wes arerrsal .srre. IN Sr -the roposed d velo ent will be de el a d b thy, exi i c rcula8 tion stems. Due. er .1to_the . o e m a r •uc . sy tem:.wi _ palm increased e. Increased rarlic on Union Ave. a wo= ane aved col- a wr :ecreat°e` kdditionaltopp©i Gintyrorsvekticle. . Qcyy e nowe 14;) . Publ.i ipS^ervices. . Will the proposal . have, an effect ,u,p"on, or, •, pedhatr an Co ict r'esu-l't'-Yri'a •'n'e•ed fo.r 'new or altered governmentat service's'' •- " in any of the following, ar,.e,as ;. a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NB b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO F'2,:3 (c,)'' '' 1ools? XSch . .. c YES MAYBE NO d) Parks ,or,.other.;recrea't:ional .fa'cilities-?.i • ,•'• • ; ..X YES MAYBE NO ' e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services?X YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: The impacts of the above questions are not signifi- cant or substantial. 15) Energy. 'Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YET- ' MAYBE N,O,.. b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new. sources of energy? •X fi—E MAYBE TU- Explanation: The energy demand for the proposed development _is moderate and attainable. The impact of this proposal related to energy on,a regional basis .is not known. A,16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? YES war NO b) ' Communications systems? YES' MAYBE NO• c) Water? X YES • MAYBE NO • 6_ d) Sewer' or septic tanks? YES. ' MA NO e) . .,Stprm water dr:ainage-? YE MAYBE NN f) Solid waste and disposal?.. . X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Utility and drainage lines have been constructed to service the proposed development. The demand. for service is relatively moderate and,within''the means' of the 'City and private utility companies to provide. 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result 'in the creation of any health 'hazard or potential health hazard (exciuding mental health)? YES MAYBE Nb Explanation: N.A. 18). Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any;'scenic,_vista,or. view, open...tothe public, or wil1 ..the, prappsal.`:,.resul`t' •.in -,the :c:reat.ion:'of, an aesthetically ,offensive si f"e. :ppe'p to .pu'b-1 i c; view? , t,, X YES MAYBE N0 F f,;' E'xplanatiort:" The' r d w n e undeve.opec ,del, .with -a paved :end andscaped,street/ corridor through it, into an urban setting, i.e. , resideuti l housing with the subsequent aesthetics change. 19') Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality. or -quantity 'of existing recreational opportunities? YES MAYBE NO Explanation.: The existing:Mobile Home Park has developed its own . passive and active recreation facilities, -i.e. , pitch and putt' course; tennis courts; parlo ,ys; swimming pool; etc 20) Archeological Hi"storical . •Wi l;l :the proposal result. in 'an .. alterat''ion :of a• significant 'archeological :or. historical site,' 'structure, , obj.ect .or: buil:d:ing? YES MAYBE N Explanation N.A. III. . SIGNATURE_. I , .•,the .undersigned, state' that *to: the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It Is understood' that the:,;lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration' of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any *willful misrepresentation•' or willful lack of full dis losure on my part.. Proponent: - t' T Ail.I:p. °... ') l I.l C.0 name...'pr:inted)`- I aEC.IED City of Renton Planning Department toy" 4 19 5-76 N NG EQ'D EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Westerly 240 feet of the following: The East 435.8 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 6 East, W.M. , EXCEPT the South 321 feet; EXCEPT the North 245 feet; EXCEPT the East .30 feet; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. ALSO The South 2 feet of the North 245 feet of the East 435.8 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , in King County, Washington, lying West of the East 170 feet thereof; EXCEPT all coal and minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same. ANo The North 200 feet of the South 321 feet of the East 435.8 feet of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 23 North, Range 6 East, W.M. , Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. pF REj, s pECEIVEb o NOV 14 1911 pF R • v 3 o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 L ;,. rt 0 24 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 40 QV 2 35-2550 FO SEP1EttO November 22 , 1977 Dave Millard Land Planning and Management 22627 - 152nd S . E . Kent , Washington 98031 RE : PROPOSED REZONE BETWEEN EXISTING LEISURE ESTATES MOBILE HOME PARK AND UNION AVENUE N . E . near Mr . Millard : Pursuant to our telephone discussion today we are withholding further processing of a rezone request to the ' T ' zone for the subject site . You had indicated a desire to request a Compre- hensive Plan review of the area south of the existing Leisure Estates . The subject site is presently designated single family residence on the Comprehensive Plan . You can however , request that this area be included in the comprehensive plan review . Attached are the procedures and necessary forms to be submitted with any Comprehensive Plan Amendment . The Finance Department will also refund the portion of the rezone fee relating to the subject site ($20 . 00 ) . We are continuing to process the rezone request for the five acre parcel located directly north of the existing Leisure Estates Mobile Home Park . I If• you have any further questions , please contact this department . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen P1 anni ng Di rector,-- 1'ichael L . Sm th Associate Planner MLS : ms Attachments cc : Dean W. Bitney fi S..,%X,,, , i, ",Yr'.,4,,.,i' ',;,}'f{,,;'.y',.'...: j:l;,''.,..; `.• 4 tri 1'Ci''S f>:. -.` _ f,'I,fT!Ae1{iy`!!'; ;:T' ',•I rih i'' 'r.-' 4it r= :'ieJ •, ''s,1 4p'•i (y°: e fin, "( f,N';cl`,:'rl; 14.p,!P.';l' •,+' t-,,,•'di vi i:,r ,,(:,..'i.,y:..,;dd l'•,l,k;;•.Lci''"y=0 ` ihh YT :`1 . F.<1 rd 6f-be 81?.iiii[l, •.ti;1,l;=:r+..' ;..,:; r'i+'.{:f•;°i.`' jyt ; nM'i".'.• 1,1.'';a .a.,t=.,, „' j ...',i .j''t•t',j• FROM='i ;;P1annin' .:D •e artiperi: ,,-`.;.; ia; .n'.:'.u:„<<.',; •• 4 F,i;1''.,,r. ,,' i, 4^9` J.;•:4,a,,' '3. 'it!,;,!: i•`;,;;I:.."• .a::s',:.*. ;.,:' r.P1.ese`:issue a refund :<c,jeck,payableg> ta„DEAN.',W•*' BITNEY i n:,the!amou it of;;$ .0. 00'? T2905:--d :',.•1 14r7.7 t A',i:i,,tie . .t , ated, .z : Refund „orr;=Rezone ••ap• plication , I . ..i ..f;,,' r!'itt°=t•' ?f:':.1`, ,f" :i'4+;,prn'.CHECK # , A,.,. a Thank you `fr mas..!t ;i°.,r, k' " ,;i°, <, T1 ,+4' i,!G=, 't'.'x"Si .t.r f. t`;knii4:'i,' s1'• Ali:'::, ;x':I- li'''i(ri`i."•:,ls. 7::.iu' is'I',I`t kf'ri, ?'.:,,{'';;f,': ;,t?N'}.,1a'<'Yrt t'•'},} i r t.i' A i i`'c` hrd :,yi h';. 4f 1. I1 S:pp;: „),)!} ip7F:. l A_ 4 jf f %r, ;"L 4 ipp " i 4.',:''• • 1,. C,.,c71i. :; > i ,1i,! ., i r r ,y,• iir'. i :• '' ,.,p r '.-d_^q,,.psi+ii ' ',•',,I i, a. '"l,, " 'j+ i,{; :':aa' . .:N^y ),' f3? 1„ V f,' l:; " '' hc5 '•f,,' 1'`.P',' • ug+ ti" 1 r,;7,;r,.,;i ,;;.. ,;,,,I.,: I:: l,i. ,f.,'l:, l i. eeze / 1 J1 t 0 31' \ .\ r''' Nk , 0\\ rq .. ' 1 ) l '\' v c\-,.. r, i ,,,,,; ., a k NN) . i t) 1Z ' s .'\ N. 1 11/28 Marge: For your files. Note: This rezone application was withdrawn before being processed through Hearing Examiner system. Willis