Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA79-306
I I 0)014N b7d 0 . / i a73, CO i r I-1 0? /I.lC/ f2E`p 4S 0 0 IL1 -,,,,1 i 2I So.v J 4 11 I. o IiinlN e 1 r . 7 1 1 1 .4j t p.vsi tIl i..1 1.i i 1 , . _ .__, i ;J 1 is Z-k, 57a4.46.e.- g . 1 g 3) ; -- --- I Ex,/2 5 1 e y P i a.:; REC 1 ED 2 i CITY OF.RENTON J HEARING EXAMINER I 8 9 n 61979 11 5d t a • AM PM 7i8,900,11,1211121314,5$6 r ITEM NO. 42-6 -7 ? J 1 C, gL.S, 955:-.0;G t If'",,' i', arm l '+°? r 1`r•,:'r .° ma c'+ r- l C."1 n 'r,.?: or ,640 Cc. )4.5;f,,, 55 77f :14 r¢ r...-:x.• ` a; . '}, F ., 6. ...a,'. ' l4' N fb uS i f ." P«° freer 1' '!a. 14 ,0 c. u•., A , t Cl2..t 5 7 . . sr5 -aCs„:-., t j r T Y f l f? lam+ J 1 / q 7724, ,- 6-7`i i 0, 1 79004 RW 304-79 R PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79, Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6 , 1979 PAGE TWO 3,. Vegetation : Low scrub grass dominates the property with a dense stand of Douglas Fir Trees extending the length of the east boundary. Parts in the north portion have been cleared and graded. 4'. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site .may provide suit- able habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the.. subject site . 6,. Land Use : An existing single family residence and a large shed are located in the southwest portion;.. o.f the property . Another single family residence is locate°ds:' imm.ediately north of the site. Additional single family dwellimg,s are found to the south and west while the property immediately east remains largely undeveloped. E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is composed principally of widely scattered single family residences . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An existing 12" water main extends north- south on the east side of Duvall adjacent to the subject site and a 3" main is located _on the west side. An 8" sanitary sewer runs east-west on S. E . 101st Street approximately 1 ,000 feet north of the subject site . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Ave- nue N. E. approximately 3/4 of a mile to the southwest of the subject site. 4. Schools : Honeydew Elementary School is approximately one mile southwest of the subject site , and McKnight Middle School is within 1 3/4 miles to the west , while Hazen HIgh School is within one-half mile to the south . 5., Recreation : Kiwanis Park is located approximately one mile to the southwest of the subject site and North Highlands Park is within 2 miles west. G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 ., Section 4-729, G , Residence Single. Family. 2. Section 4-704 , SR-1 , Residence Single Family. H . AP'PLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1. Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 ; . Short Subdivisions . 2 ., Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 . 66; Waived Improve- ments . 3. , Subdivision Ordinance , Section '9-1109; Exceptions . 4. Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6, p. 18. I . IMPACTS ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . , Natural Systems : Minor 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 6, 1979 APPLICANT: FRANCIS J . - BRIERE - FILE NUMBERS : R-306-79 , SHORT PLAT 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 A. SUMMARY' AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR- 1 and a proposed three-lot short plat. In order to allow such subdi - vision , the applicant is also requesting an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to permit two 25-foot pipestem roads . In addition , the application includes a request for waiver of the required off-site improvements . (Site development reap attached . ) :; B . GENERAL INFORMATION :': 1. Owner of Record : , FRANCIS J . BRIERE 2 . Applicant : FRANCIS J . BRIERE 3. Location : Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N . E . Vicinity map attached ) 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : 3. 34 'acres 6. Access :Via Duvall "Avenue N . E . 7 . . Existing Zoning G" , General Classification District. 8.' Existing Zoningin G" ; General Classification the Area : District; King County SR Mininum lot size 7200 square feet with sewers ; 15 ,000 square feet without ) . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential . 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on February 23 , 1979,. and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordi - nance on February 22 , 1979. C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2945 dated July 17 , 1975. D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is generally level . 2. Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture , berries , row crops , and for urban development. l 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELiIIINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS .J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short 'Plat` : .' 307-79, E-308-79 andW-309-79 MARCH 6 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 6. All the departments reviewing this proposal indicate no objections other than the situation . in #5 :above . 7 . Analysis items 3 and 4 appear to comply with Section 4-3014, thus substantiating the proposed rezone . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENATIONS : Approval of the requested rezone from "G" to "SR-1" based on ' the compatibility of the proposed use with the existing uses and that . the , site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review. N . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS (SHORT PLAT) : 1. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan , which designates the site and surrounding area as single family residential . 2. The proposal is compatible with adjacent single family residential uses and similar patterns in the area . 3. The size of the existing property is large enough that the proposed short plat is a reasonable use of the land . Proposed Lot #1 is approximately 21 , 605 square feet , and Lot #2 is approximately 105 ,4,60 square feet. ' Lot #3 with the existing residence is approximately 18 ,496 square feet. 4. Although the lots of the proposed short plat do exceed the minimum lot size requirement of the SR-1 zone and the Subdivision Ordinance , the amount of frontage on Duvall Avenue N. E. is not sufficient to meet the 75 foot standard for each lot. The applicant is therefore proposing Lot #3 with a 125-foot frontage with Lots #1 and #2 designed as pipestem lots with 25-foot frontages and 125 foot and 145 foot pipestem lengths respectively. . 51. The parcel immediately west and north of proposed Lot #1 is separate and apart from the subject site and contains frontage on Duvall• Avenue• N . E . Because of this location , proposed Lots #1 a'nd #2 cannot meet the frontage require- ment of the SR-1 zone . It would seem, therefore , that reasonable justification can be provided for the exception as proposed in #4 above. (Section 9-1109. 1A) 6. The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advises that if and when Lot #2 is developed , the additional 25 feet of . right-of-way in Lot #1 will have to be acquired to provide for a full 50-foot wide street with improvements . 7 ; At this time off-site improvements along Duvall Avenue N. E . are very limited . ' Therefore , deferring improvements until a future time, appears warranted.. Thus , the waiver of off- site improvements subject to restrictive covenants providing for future LID participation appears satisfactory. 8. At such time as Parcel' #2 is further developed by a street extension , area-wide circulation can be addressed to insure access , if required , to rthe''east 'of this parcel . 9. At the time of this report preparation , we have received no written comments from outside departments . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6, 1979 PAGE THREE 2 . Population/Employment : Minor 3 . Schools : Minor 4 . Social : Minor 5. Traffic : The proposed short plat will generate approximately 20 additional vehicle trips per day on Monroe Avenue N . E . This. would crease traffic flow by less than 1% per day on this arterial . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , no determination of environmental significance is required for the short plat. However, a declaration of non-significant impact has been prepared fo.r the rezoning due to its scope . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3.. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map element which designates the site and general area as single family residential . . 2. ,The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject site into three parcels . This will require the approval of a short plat by the Hearing Examiner. In addition , exceptions for two pipestem' roads and a request for waiver of off-site improvements: will be required. 3. The subject site, has been zoned "G" since it was annexed in 1975. Review of the Planning Department records does not indicate an areawide zoning review of the site since that time. 4. The subject site is located on the east side of Duvall Avenue N . E . The land on the west side of Duvall within the City is presently zoned "G" also . Some properties in King County on the west side of the street are zoned Suburban Residential with a minimum lot size of, 7200 square feet with sewers and 15 ,000 square feet without sewers . Portions of the properties have been subdivided into lots 9, 000 to 13 , 000 square feet.= All properties in the applicant ' s proposed short plat would exceed 18 , 000 square feet. The proposed rezone to SR-1app.ears consis.tent. with the existing, properties in the area and , therefore , appropriate for the site . The Land Use Report, 1965 , advises : "Encourage the development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote thebest interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desir- ability as a '-place in which to work , shop , live , and play. " ' , (Objective 6, p. 18) 5. Suitable water supply is available to the subject site. However , the nearest sewer line is approximately 1/4 mile to the north of the site , and the Utilities Engineering Division advises that pumping would be required . R Eivi, . 1 i 2 v 4.--,,g 7"'-lc.!,...,-, t" C‘IF ° I I g5 4-.. ,.. . - ... .1 6,xiAintA .1 . 1 ,4_, 07 r- 1,, sic„,...„_, g7,,e,FEB 9 19Th 1 1 0 -------------- 1 e I ' A-I iORT AtC r DAINAN 66 I LI Ck- 471V G I. I 14% i I i i 2 160f/1.r ts,• • 1 ik4 I N '!4 I 41.$ 1 4 M t I 1 I \ L..) i c.5,-z.,•..4.-,-,..,..: I' 0 II • id I il...../.- I Yi 5 I I 4:•• -',‘-• I T. 124.. fA•, EC. T 2, e; 4/2/ 2 6 77 44'3( --:• 15•. ii\-,----•:-,:..• 7- .•-..- 46, 3 s-.-.'.• i.-/., 1• 4..-__- -.'..,:..:-.•-:.--. 7.•.•."•- 5.,-...._....._"..._::,-'..._.• t'_....:_.-.--:' f_•/,: 4-_..-._',_/. c_,•"...:_:_-•:.:..-_1,- f..-,_'.,_.:.f. e I475lC 6 /Z1er z 7. D..•_'.-..' 2'- - 772cr z::.-"_-: v:. L..•.•-- i1II f-.,.•:.-:- I . 7900:'^r---7. - • •-...---, a PLANNING DEPARTMENT. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79, Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6, 1979 PAGE FIVE 0 . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval of the short plat and proposed exception for the pipestem lot , subject to the following conditions : 1 . Final Public Works Department approval of storm drainage plans . 2. Payment of standard fees as per Utilities Engineering Division comments . Waive off-site improvements subject to provision of restrictive covenants providing for future LID participation for improve- ments to Duvall Avenue N . E. d ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR,. APPLICATION TO: . Q Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPa Department DPolice Department Public Wo s Department Q Building Div. Engineering' Div.. (Please verify legal descriptic OTraffic Engineering Div . Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his si/gnee ) Ar/ eZr..."14/Vg DATE : /)(0/79 PLEA E REVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 2f/ l LOCATION : I hm// e A _ APPLICATION(S) : gA a"/ 79 ,, 6 4/ eaat /06-79 vay/e/- IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED THE PLANNING REPORT DEPARTMENT HEARING X N RETURN ANY COMMENTS REVIEW 'BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : E1 Approved 7EZof Appr v d Comments or conditions : 154_4 erte,e0,__,, d o 11-0-- 11-t eL iCa.T a,at a t o Zvxe Gi' Are., /I/,f= dzi/ 77 Signature of Director or Authorized R presentative Date i i 4.4,4.,..i4"'W 4 . 41, .• J r •1 0. • f.' .•r, q 42-'•'.\ :,• ! '.' r...--...........- t.' '„ • . . . 4 lt '•i•k ' ' 1 r r r I C i " •' ,Vre'r', . •1 : .., . ut. •.• :i.•• .'r t • N .S A (!''' e. t-t 4 I..,, 4,....; g'••'r,0. : A.:., oz. • 4"*:•0!4' t* *:• 4 t-,40'•4,...04INVAV Is N41,Y'1-' ;'''' '''' '' '''''4 Q .61410,affli4'4"...?•'%g 1.p MP.•4,,, 4.1'.4.4,A;i,4.444,:cy-14.io::-.'•'.;',1."•vs..V. t.'1,,!:',..4, . lf.,01,,j ' . . • i 1--;111,F t V..s,„, ,... lift, i • . . ,, , ,. 40„.„.5„, p..,..., ..„., , ••, ,., y ,.„f ' t-.' ISr. t f •: 46, 11.. .f,^-,1, ,, 110•."A:4 "% r.- 1.'• ; IT ti,i' **.' ,411 i-•1-,lik• ‘74% 4•, A•_:— ,.•,1-‘, i . tiii ..& 4%4; • 4'.": A% f'' h wo 1:34 • t.•. i**, y t... Vs 'i,. •. li -•,1,• t, ,•,•••, • 4 °1.i V.•:' . I>'‘.'4.,',,,V°, 4.a...,,,,,,,,,+.1.4,...111:11,114#141q.14%.4.,C. •, 1:0'°''''-' ',,fi f'''..•441Ats..4,r-'..'. ..n.',1,'CIV,,,AV.,-.,q.,,..4•,,,,4J,Aate•,,.A.. ...__-.,.,. . . 1 tI i 1, „.„4,•_gliet, ; j 144 1,,,. ell,t.i ,, •!!••!'•',' ; f, ,, j I'....• •,-,.v01, ,,fl.f‘' '...2P Ja 1....P.,..., *N.... . • t ,;! 1,'- • .‘s,'‘ ' .. -. 4..0' 43 int VON • ' 1 i• *. 4.:',• ,V1%.*.> 49. 44 : % f . ' •.. • .'' 41 44i14i'y /0„„„............ 4.47H.•‘, , ; A, i 141:1% •",•,:gt"' c,. rket,&,'-'41•:,4'"•• I t„..4 1; deliitP-' ' 1 Ai 1, r S. 2, i 4.... I 00. t • i 1Ttittb 4''. 0. 4). ' A. ' 4' .;,d/ ' I . aiif 44* 'IPI''' ' ''' '.. 't/ '•' ' I 4 0 1.• • 4 1#'I., 1 4.* ° 1°: , ....%, f.r tlk, 11:11. 4fINit• . A f..1,,•••‘„„...**,,,, 0. r.• -i. . 0,' .- , ,_ ell,' -,,,. ..;,.: 4,, , ..„1,, . r.ripp, il,',, ""Z,:o vo. 4 l't, 1*. ,c,•.,,,,.. v-,,: t "11 1 . Ot • ti- '• • To ii. • 1,,,,?..4..v f.18,. ct VISO* 1in; 3• 4..; ./.11 4..i le y j , ..,.., • •i r • W 2.,'41.'7".•reh- t.., a.v •-4:1,...5 tatiati •, . :•,... ,Jwiftv64..4-'it: e....,,,••„.- Itl, , Ito...::* ' Ala II! •-.0 4 -‘1"'..4,-; A , i114.,:i I 1,1T,Ti,S) . , . : t ., „,1.....i e,' tti•i;:, D,- `,.fptil.., v ;k,.'t•t ..". !!!,,/ fit Z. 114111M1101.. • - fir., j,. t , i Al..11`• ' , ', # 4 ! 4- .i''•;'.111.14."4.- ,^ I; 40• 00# 0, i) 0'1 `• A•c \ :' 74''';..: 'iv,,-4:' 'i„ i v• V,to• k,', il .1. I. 0, t1.601011 00,0;I ilkj 0-19 4: 11614ii- 1.104110 lei_ iq i. i t ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department OPolice Department O Public Works Department O Building Div . 0 ngineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptic Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or 0 his sig/nee) gz/1I ' DATE : e 9 :79 PLEA E REVIEW Tneeitei IS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : t LOCATION : dea . AlOg r#e ,6' APPLICATION(S) : mb tw.-79 i 4(fiee, 06-1 eddefr ae9-60)? IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : lG Approved L_._1 Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or uthorized Repr entative Da e ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Q Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department 0 Police Department Public 4forks Department Building Div. 0 Engineering Div.. (Please verify legal descriptic OTraffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his signee ) AO C aj DATE : "ii 09 PLEA E REVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : iv) taie LOCATION : giV . a 1m/O APPLICATION (S) : JA I fat V 79 6.4 ee,att 106-00O edtelefr ele96.0)1. IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : DL I- t Appro'ved En Not Approved Comments or conditions : Z-2d - F.0111111F',a, e%7 Date Signature . 6 rector or Aut. rized Representative ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department eiPolice Department Public Works Department ttilding Div . Engineering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designgleltg4ap e aztile,o, ' SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : Action Name : Ln21 - 4;_:,414'01/.e MIN Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) :II'%/ /em s17s Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : t ! SIGNIFICANT I ANON SIG I ICANT Comments : 212-// 77 Signature of Director or Authorize Represe tat ' ve Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: J j nance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department O Police Department O Public Works Department HH O Building Div. Engineering Div.. (Please verify legal description O Tr'affic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his si/gnee ) is tql/i IC. & EWøf/5 'DATE : 14 "4V PLEA E ,R EEVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : 2f/e LOCATION : ge6 hm// Jae „ti APPLICATION(S) eb1 AO' v 7 y9 z' L4' Off& 10 41 0 O 4r,40' IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 1 g 10 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: / Approved Not Approved p,/ //v/9/247,02 /O/c 4S Comments or conditio ns : ,e uie i' ,'' /, ,, ' 1'G I/7-/.ti S'/zCS i O J//S !zei l i Uv As ,`Q.,ri.-c, ,s v G '/7 7 2 t'`G,,L,Lz zl c<', 4-ccass w/'A/ Ccc.5S /9Az0_ffei c/yx.9g--4 'i.S ,Sr itze. r3c i4vs--7-/)uGl7 . -r.0 /r-' ir":-. ii, o S o / '% /.J ,,'-lG/AvC Gcjn-r/cic 7 ,P. /`7/ti 2. S'/1/Lt- 6 /-- l s cat dig s.< ( /2 A) 2_ 7_2 c-7-7 Signature of Directo or Alit orized Rep esentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : U"`''r"'s x -.1" En Approved Q Not Approved Comments or conditions : SLI J36L.-1 t—J ,-,d 7-6/.414,r-( 6.(‘--CdsiS't)r`( i), Signatu a L of Director or Authorized Representative Date V J ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: 0 Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . E neering Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Q Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his design gz,‘Adia, Ole'?i/ e SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : lel Action Na me :: F/W Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : 79 Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : l-41- G l/ 7A/E(_-1=TAAG SIGNIFICANT SIGNIFICANT Comments : 4/ 17-C27 -0--/-96L,,'L-•c27,/P /7? or'" Date Signature of Director Au't iorized Represq (tative I ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: 0 Finance Department III Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department g'''''® Public Wo ks Department Building Div . Engineering Div . O Traffic Engineering Div . Ti Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his d e s i g n((// 1/2 ie & tdieifif e/479 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : Action Name : /L / Mir ,116ee/ Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) :79 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :8 e.a, G 1 ! SIGNIFICANT l I NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : e-e-v,- do''''4--C 2-z0 ^, Signature Director or Authorized Representative PROPOSED/FINAL,. JECLARAT ION OF ;'.S I GN I F I CANC NON-SIGNIFICANCE r` . PROPOSED DeclarationApplication .No` R-306-79 Environmental Checklist' 'No ECF-434-79 X FINAL Declaration Description''of". proposal ' .:The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G" General , Classification District, to "SR-1", Single Family Residential . Proponent;FRANCTS ,1 _ RRTFRF Locationon !of Proposal. Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. Lead Agency RFNT)N PLANNING I)FPARTMFNT This proposal has:.been determined to 0 have: E not have a . significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ® , is ax is' not required 'under.:.RCW 43 . 21C , 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after:. review' by ,the., lead :agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non'. Reasons for , declaration of/environmental significance : This declaration has been issued for rezoning only based on the compatibility of the proposed use with the existing uses and that the site ..has. not: been previously considered by an area-wide ..zoning reviews Measures ,' 'if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) . declaration ' of n`on-significance : i ii f i Responsible Official Gordon Y . Er'icksen j Title :i yPl ann ,; g D; ' ec o Date • February 27 , 1979 Signature 44 r, City, of Renton Planning Department. . 5-76 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department V . Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Q Public Works Department Building Div . Engineering Div . erivaffic Engineering Div . atilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his design - 1-1//P e gz .ve,(i, i/,,/ SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : Action Name : Sr2if /75e s' dw// :A,,if/. Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : gi* 79 Note: Responses, to be written in ink. e REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 9/ 5— SIGNIFICANT l I NON SIGNIFICANT fib /`/7/Ji4A-,7- die//9 /Y1L'/. Comments :. iec u/ , , S ,oe r7 .0- Cev,4f) aim!c /Wiwi-) Si%-'s 4-;vr2 11 'S irtGit io, 4-S ,Pc- <,e o , ,, t i 2 a-e ee-2i C 7acczfKr cam, /I/ - 74 —ire- O Hof cc-k,7 7t >u,f,62-7t-, /Q C-r; re"/ems _ 0 j/ IOW-4-AS sue/ c_ at-. ,,f 57/?8J /4'r7 ,E'% / /Cie cLL(r6 i Cd /0-'Y' a,c e /ti(- 0,,,,s-i2e_.,;v. /y4-7;:i :S/.//'Ge_ A1Z e 4/r 2%/7 072_ Svic'af l i g ://;--.7' //7? Signature of Director or Authorized Represent *lib— Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UTtt_tin-S pEP . 1" SIGNIFICANT 1 NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : rcP6,014, I 4- /SQ.rI. Fug '."ra.z. It{15 5.f JOlv(SiJnC wr- 2o'cZur2 A l.ATa`2 1ornl ce WvtC--r-{ A?PL«n Fog , No 5%,4=2 s=o,ACo A n,,46“: AT s -r,--1 - 01_6,/-7 7 Signatu e f Director or Authorized Representative Date A r Y, r} , ,, xri t la,-too rr3i t' r 1'4r ' ti '' rr w '' try: a ' d't. :.f•'k .. 3 er Li.* s f1}x Y 1 r ` ett 1 y +st ii1 uix t, rA c,,.Y .x vs*.' .:^i,Fa K:i, it EVER ;.L I....CATION: .h D, Or ADDRESS. PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF 1800 DUVALL AVENUE N ,E® LEG ,'s DE RIPTIIN: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S I I=STED TO No`TIFY PROPERTY 0'. NE;e S AT U t'+ ) irA, A IDli I k• - '--,'r"1 '^' 41''ti: x Si( n ,` . re d I TO BE HELD IN CITY C oU CIL CHAY-' =ERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON MARCH 6, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. 1,.P . I 4 1.i1 µt'4:. l Sl r' ITEM [71 r"y g`- F* , , r G TO SR-114741 is a .n. r. e' r rill Ir i,o, ' ittr •' i- I 7,,e41 $ ''4. 4 i' l‘ 1! * • r f* L i i,ky v.,.. 4, A E f 1,, ,,OF OFF—SITE IMPROVEMENTS M ;^ tl °• i CY Mk s J`, ' r tF rF ,„ 4' t f fi I y .", sft 1( .Y, yv+ I T EiafS<:r F , 7R,... k. ,1 Mnn'tEJ awl.: k 1THREE—LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL y .j EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RE. PIPESTEM LOTS o. F'i'-° FU,tTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE, NETT ? c=E }' _:MOVE® WITHOUT E= 'OIL" AU P. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MARCH 6 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. DENNIS D. AND LOIS E. HYLAND, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-1 TO R-3, File R-305-79; property located at 516 Williams Ave. So. between Burnett Ave. So. and Wells Ave. So. 2. FRANCIS J. BRIERE, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO SR-1, File R-306-79; property located in the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N.E. 3. FRANCIS J. BRIERE, APPLICATIONS FOR THREE-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL, File 307-79, EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RE. PIPESTEM LOTS, File E-308-79, AND WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, File W-309-79; property located in the vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. N.E. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 6, 1979 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED February 23, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the - 2o'Aday of 19 -r j . SIGNED jG 2- 7. Location „of.+proposal (describe; the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : o ZiVf-L i // — VA. Tom/'.;_ 6t--7-,644 12Z/t7P/CGy //-A)7 71 ' _A 0,f % &7 T 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : L4?( 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : 2U,vc'r, s;;/027 /2/i 5U/G/„ /J 9 ,4 /ZA!//T 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes , explain: N O 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: 5 04 7 l'A 7- ? 3i D/1- h A72/--A°7- II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe"-answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in : a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE ND b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE NO c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? p Y!— MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? MAYBE NU- e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean for any bay, inlet or lake? MAYBE N Explanation: (6) 4/'<) dPE247,01 2 L47'/-' ?o 8 c//C O/N 9 (9r/17i /c7/Or-) T D CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON z ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM p +,•,,,.•'` w 4 dr q NING FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. le 41 Environmental Checklist No. PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance 0 Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent t l"/ L3/2/ERE 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: Oo Dv Avv. ,0 . 12 i-r7'or/ GUI s/i 9gOr Tg:L: 2c S - 6,"6c' 3. Date Checklist submitted 4. Agency requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: F2."-I 5/2/c 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : L v O' 7 mac.-4-7 3 ,4-c. 7 c. h%v 370(/X 4 _S"i -a O/4 . 4 0,07Aor-) 28:17 lasticL 9ldo i°® o,-) M7?ce2 / Dfi /?20I tW S"/ o n 7 4- 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species. of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? yrs MAYBE NO b) Reduction of the 'numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Yrs MAYBE • NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES— Mom' W Explanation: 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? f YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in .the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NU Explanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? yrs— MAYBE W Explanation: FOSS/8e c_ /NCI26?t-.SL= i/C-J 3- 2) Air. Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? V! MAYBE NU- b) The creation of objectionable odors? Tn.- MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally?VIES MAYBE KU- Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YET- M__ ITE b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MArBE FJU- c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES— MAYBE d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? VET- MUTE N0 e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES MAYBE Fs- f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? VE- MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? S MAYBE OM— h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct infection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? ES MAYBE F1U- i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available ' for public water supplies?YET- FIRTHgo- Explanation:(`) /7c C ?pig /2-c 7e SC. '2 c %/ai ic_ 01. /V eLo s 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? Vim-- MAYBE AU- b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? Vim" MAYBE NU- c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing e.-- species? Ira- MAYBE A- d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? V Fib Explanation: 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NY— f) Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? VES MAYBE Nb- Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? L__ YES M YBE NO Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the l-- quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? DES MAYBE NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.A Propone. . 1'44 (` signed) 7/ name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or -demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? c__— YES MAYBE Fr d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YET— MAYBE NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? L YES TOTE" NO f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? L-- YES MAYBE WU— Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? . L YES MAYBE b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? L__- YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES Mom' NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) ' Use 'of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE NU Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 1-- YES MAYBE NO b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO c) Water? L" YES MAYBE NO AFFIDAVITR EA/is FEB 9 19` I beingdulyswo-r. i,N(de'lare that IFRAN89S' J. BR ERE am the owner of the property involved in this application arid—that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 1st day of Felosthary 19 79 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Name of Notary Public)J Signature ` Ow 4033 NE Sunset Blvd„ Edenton, Wn. 98055 c^c :D v" f ALL- A y , Ai , Address) Address) N L r s cr City) State) 5- o j o g cf j6 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 CITY OF RENTON RECEIUE 't L[I C RP_7ONr APPLICATION c. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY FEB 9 1919 LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO.EXAMINER 'S ACTION APPLICATION FEE $ /x?,Oh APPEAL FILED 142,1111111607 RECEIPT NO . 0/W% CITY COUNCIL ACTION Dt2E. FILING DATE1 ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1 . Name 7'4/au'h" &/EFt Phone Z S d--.110, Address /o7IJ Dc.11/44- /414r. i £ 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on /FDU 17(JV/4-L. , 6r1" Lr between ! and 4 . Square footage or acreage of property 3 gt 44: . 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) 772,4 . 2 J 2t /d .>? /.4744-Li— / ,4-E S 2-C 2,e/.i N- a/vL U/f/ Sa 6, /744'7s /24 fo/1/AI 6.A X A..16 CI., a./41IL Cfrs ./— Of?h# i47 0 f1 A-67 a / — 6 . Existing Zoning c Zoning Requested S./-,-"/ NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit. this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site /v C ,0,c4r7t./r1— 'OtiC` /' ?A ' ?f//)C i-ICe-- 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the- surrounding area. 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? C' 7f 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. i\\ Planning Dept. 1-77. • 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79, Short Plat 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH', 6 , 1979 PAGE TWO 3 .. -.Vegetati on : ' Low scrub grass dom`i nates the property with a dense stand of Douglas Fir Trees extending the length of the east boundary. Parts in the north portion have been cleared and graded. 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site may provide suit- able habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land Use : An existing single family residence and a large shed are located in the southwest portion of the property . Another single family residence is located immediately north of the site. Additional single family dwellings are found to the south and west while the property immediately east remains largely undeveloped . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is composed principally of widely scattered single family residences . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An existing 12" water main extends north south on the east side of Duvall adjacent to the subject site and a 3" main is located on thee west side. An 8" sanitary sewer runs east-west on S . E . 101st Street approximately 1 , 000 feet north of the subject site . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route 107 operates along Union Ave- nue N. E. approximately 3/4 of a mile to the southwest of the subject site. 4. Schools : Honeydew Elementary School is approximately one mile southwest of the subject site , and McKnight Middle School is within 1 3/4 miles to the west , while Hazen HIgh School is within one-half mile to the south . 5. Recreation : Kiwanis Park is located approximately one mile to the ' southwest of the subject site and North Highlands Park is within 2 miles west. G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 .' Section 4-729, G , Residence Single Family. 2 . Section 4-704 , SR-1 , Residence Single Family . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 ; Short Subdivisions . 2 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 . 66 ; Waived Improve- ments . 3 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1109 ; Exceptions . 4. Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report`,' Objective 6 , P . 18 . I . IMPACTS ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Minor RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 61979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 7 8,9,IO,l1ti1Z,1, ,3,4,, P PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 6, 19 HiBIT NO. f APPLICANT : FRANCIS : J :" BRIERE ITEM NO. R- 3° -7,l FILE NUMBERS : R-306-79 , SHORT PLAT 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 A . SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR-1 and a proposed three-lot short plat . In order to allow such subdi - vision , the applicant is also requesting an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to permit two 25-foot pipestem roads . In addition , the application includes a request for waiver of the required off-site improvements . (Site development map attached . ) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1. Owner of Record : FRANCIS J . BRIERE 2 . Applicant : FRANCIS J . BRIERE 3. Location : Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave . N . E . Vicinity map attached ) 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5. Size of Property : 3. 34 acres 6. Access :Via Duvall Avenue N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning G" , General Classification District , 8. Existing Zoning in G" , General Classification the Area : District ; King County SR Mininum lot size 7200 square feet with sewers ; 15 ,000 square feet without ) . 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential . 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing ' date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on February 23 , 1979, and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordi - nance on February •22 , 1979. C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 2945 dated July 17 , 1975. D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The site is generally level . 2 . Soils : Alderwood Gravelly Sandy Loam (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to medium , and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber , pasture , berries , row crops , and for urban development . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 6. All the departments reviewing this proposal indicate no objections other than the situation in #5 above . 7 . Analysis items 3 and 4 appear to comply with Section 4-3014 , thus substantiating the proposed rezone . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENATIONS : Approval of the requested rezone from "G" to " SR-1 " based on the compatibility of the proposed use with the existing uses and that the site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review. N . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS (SHORT PLAT ) : 1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan , which designates the site and surrounding area as single family residential . 2 . The proposal is compatible with adjacent single family residential uses and similar patterns in the area . 3 . The size of the existing property is large enough that the proposed short plat is a reasonable use of the land . Proposed Lot #1 is approximately 21 , 605 square feet , and Lot #2 is approximately 105 ,460 square feet. Lot #3 with the existing residence is approximately 18 ,496 square feet . 4 . Although the lots of the proposed short plat do exceed the minimum lot size requirement of the SR-1 zone and the Subdivision Ordinance , the amount of frontage on Duvall Avenue N . E . is not sufficient to meet the 75 foot standard for each lot. The applicant is therefore proposing Lot #3 with a 125-foot frontage with Lots #1 and #2 designed as pipestem lots with 25-foot frontages and 125 foot and 145 foot pipestem lengths respectively. 5. The parcel immediately west and north of proposed Lot #1 is separate and apart from the subject site and contains frontage on Duvall Avenue N . E . Because of this location , proposed Lots #1 and #2 cannot meet the frontage require- ment of the SR-1 zone . It would seem, therefore , that reasonable justification can be provided for the exception as proposed in #4 above . (Section 9-1109 . 1A) 6 . The Engineering Division of the Public Works Department advises that if and when Lot #2 is developed , the additional 25 feet of right-of-way in Lot #1 will have to be acquired to provide for a full 50-foot wide street with improvements . 7 . At this time off-site improvements along Duvall Avenue N . E . are very limited . Therefore , deferring improvements until a future time appears warranted. Thus , the waiver of off- site improvements subject to restrictive covenants providing for future LID participation appears satisfactory . 8 . At such time as Parcel #2 is further developed by a street extension , area-wide circulation can be addressed to insure access , if required , to the east of this parcel . 9 . At the time of this report preparation , we have received no written comments from outside departments . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat 307-79, E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6 , 1979 PAGE THREE 2 . Population/Employment : Minor 3 . Schools : Minor 4 . Social : Minor 5. Traffic : The proposed short plat will gq„Iwe approximately 20 additional vehicle trips per day on MU Avenue N . E . This would increase traffic flow by less than 1% per day on this arterial . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , no determination of environmental significance is required for the short plat. However , a declaration of non-significant impact has been prepared for the rezoning due to its scope . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS - REZONE : 1 . The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan map element which designates the site and general area as single- family residential .. 2 . The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject site into three parcels . This will require the approval of a short plat by the Hearing Examiner-. In addition , exceptions for two pipestem roads and a request for waiver of off-site improvements will be required . 3. The subject site has been zoned "G" since it was annexed in 1975 . Review of the Planning Department records does not indicate an areawide zoning review of the site since that time. 4 . The subject site is located on the east side of Duvall Avenue N . E . The land on the west side of Duvall within the City is presently zoned "G" also . Some properties in King County on the west side of the street are zoned Suburban Residential with a minimum lot size of 7200 square feet with sewers and 15 ,000 square feet without sewers . Portions of the properties have been subdivided into lots 9, 000 to 13 , 000 square feet . All properties in the applicant ' s proposed short plat would exceed 18 , 000 square feet. The proposed rezone to SR-1 appears consistent with the existing properties in the area and , therefore , appropriate for the site . The Land Use Report , 1965 , advises : " Encourage the development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desir- ability as a place in which to work , shop , live , and play . " (Objective 6 , p . 18) 5 . Suitable water supply is available to the subject site. However , the nearest sewer line is approximately 1/4 mile to the north of the site , and the Utilities Engineering Division advises that pumping would be required . i roF RE'iv, I k 2 c., I i 6114#71IN4 I I I F EB 9 191E. ) Fy ONNAAN166 f 1 44-1..5-110/:e 7r Lp,,, c 1z,.I i 7 2/6•01->". t) !,,J i Na" ,,:\I• i I`.1 i'lL b i - t• t.,-i P ico fati2 4. • NI 47- i 7),)- . i t 6,..6- 4:. I 11 tlif. 9 4 rtIt ; 9 1 1.1 I N. 1 in .ri .,,,. .5,;...,•.::,„..__,___ . 1 s..___.- . 5,...., ••-. Za -i 1 I is 0,7‘. •''. i i 4,A02.4 1'. id eV: 1 fii 0 5.4•-_- -.,f- J 1 Tr2- .1L---.......L,-,y /-% .4,-;.;-:_k..:,..4::_•:_ 7Zi.k.:-,-.7.-: 5,•,:_-.--,..•.,,•' -...,.••••.- .1-,F: .---z g , : .....„._..__.:„...,,.._ s.- qc-evf.7,76 9//.1 1/.:2w.,..-4.5. .6.5', /-346C 3.,_: C.;:r" 7-).-rit"..`; I . • • . 7.-.L. .•,......:•--. ' ;"-. "-",:.,--' :-..-- : .7:7,i.7..-. -- ,.-'....-.- 6r-Ca.,:;'.f.' oF e,,,e; Cc.11.4.7,4„ _Jt:-,;- 7:ft.... /...;;;4774 i---- ;- ; :. ..--- 7 • ' -'.. ... _,. ,•::' !.":•-:.1-- _,.. .. 7.:.-7.---z•• d7,5,;f. ,41,4_7 Ce• 77ro: 01/&57 / ,,...) i=6 e r M:)-' 1.. . -11 '', 7......",- 1,\-':- ... • ,.' : '..... • •:- Ce'•--- .'.:-.1' E _i•- - i----: : -"..' 4,,, -/.:;:./e._-,..) et.04 e, %-irE, /,./c.i:rfr ZJ f--.t.: C..' Sr i: f.: /4.1 /.."= ,-'-'..,--./_.."7-- i'"--7•••. 1 77244-7- 79004! PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER . PUBLIC HEARING : FRANCIS J . BRIERE , Files R-306-79 , Short Plat 307-79 , E-308-79 and W-309-79 MARCH 6 , 1979 PAGE FIVE 0 . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION : Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval of the short plat and proposed exception for the pipestem lot , subject to the following conditions : 1 . Final Public Works Department approval of, storm drainage plans . 2. Payment of standard fees as per Utilities Engineering Division comments . Waive off-site improvements subject to provision of restrictive covenants providing for future LID participation for improve- ments to Duvall Avenue N . E . ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department oPa kc Department 0 Police Department Public Works Department 0/Building Div . 4 Engineering' Div.. ( Please verify legal descriptic Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his •,signee ) PIC//9l/i DATE : -2///7, PLEA E REVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 4- e LOCATION : 1 . hm// ,iiie A/ APPLICATIONS ) : c`7%b air 9 6li6 a j- IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX/X MINa ' RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 7 , REVIEW BY . OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :55_____J Approved of Appr v d Comments or conditions : 94_,,, t„,t,e/(.4..0—. ''1I----- Oa-3 per•-c--- G- o-i -C r""`Tl Z j':! 7it:6-2....)--4./L_ EI- -- / d,t- ,41 --4,c, aVt-a-E-:01-(- z. 5Z , -2 y ,,, , --4- ‘- ccp---e;1---2-4_ ( 1- - 1-4-1- 2- 4-r .'''''r Lb . e....j,„-„,14± ,,,,,,n „..,.. d-z--,._/-„,,, ,,A--, , pe,,,,z -(„JI,',4.,,,/ zv e e-t a..to 1, 3 ., A.V L// Are_, , ,.E Et_ 4Y1/1-- 4,_-2,-// 27 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date AtOv 01 ,AR jf Af e lit Ail 0 isOpt ca AMR ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department 0 Park Department 0 Police Department Ti Public Works Department Building Div . 0 Engineering' Div'. (Please verify legal descriptic OTraffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning De*/ ,)partment , ( signed by responsible official or his si/gnee ) e DATE : h/79 PLEA E REVIEW TIIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 4 et! LOCATION : I a' !/ 11e ,/e° APPLICATION ( S) : gaief "f 1 t9 , , 0%07(6 fa-- / 0.e,- ,e/ ihys,64- ade,b5, IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 'Z g 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : jr Approved LA Not Approved Comments or conditions : 4 Signature gh1' `` C rector or Aut rued Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department ill • Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department t un ding Div . 0 Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his design e 6itdia, 09)z2 e SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : Action Name :5:4/, ' Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : Note: Responses to be written An ink . J REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department CT) C„,_ 1 ! SIGNIFICANT I NON SIG I ICANT Comments : 2/2-// 7 r____________ Signature of Director or Authorize Represe tat ' ve Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Q Finance Department Fire Department 411 Library Department Park Department Police Department O Public Works DepartmentI/ Building Div . 2) Engineering Div.. (Please verify legal description J „Tfr'affic Engineering Div . 640 ------27 a Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his signee ) r 1 di., s DATE : 9 PLEA E REVIEW T IS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 1) 76°,1, 1‘6' LOCATION : 6i# 1://nig APPLICATION(S) : g at 4 -f9 6* 10--/ 44 02.1, IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX MIN RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : l g v REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : El/Approved Li Not Approved y,. i/yr.7/1 9- A2 i/>.-A i.',4f Comments or conditions , e/, As, I'C/' %ep c,//4..,4%2' 7)-rti S'i S A - J"S/4Ui•9-iiU4./ AS , (1, cr i3 V Cv/i 7/Z j%t-.G',i--L!?i c.<'. de-CCC[S Gvi77-/ Tui24./—/1--707 r/L-4o c_d2 p'IZnG'6—,vG=7' %Cu t-i-",/Gr---% /2A;')J/c7{- yid S ,_S/t/tzL.. /a: /Av5i/ GG, 4 fp , ?-' - ''2 lm.ws Ga 47,--'' /3i, rC—C/,t-C Gc,j.,:sir/ 7c l7 I,',/• ,474-i/., ,r,,,w6, r-ge/3:-7> r ' , Q'2 scJ -(i< l /2 i) 7S Signature of Directo or ut o r---\7-----,----2 7-z " rized Rep esentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : tA"L-`T"'s a" 3 Approved r 1 Not Approved Comments or conditions : c-i.i(w c,(' iJ ,-A 7-62f14.is( C/r-C4VS«J.( 2/26171 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date I ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: 0 Finance Department III ' ' Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department 8 Building Div . E neering Div . Traffic EngineeriJg Div . CD Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( si4/4 egned by responsible official or his designef 6gz„,fi fir' SUBJECT : Reviewof ECF- Application No . : 1 Action Name : 141/1/ Adyer , i ,o requested by (date ) : 7' Please review the attached . Review Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :7 , -/ G V ZA/CEl-T d416 SIGNIFICANT N-6N SIGNIFICANT Comments : f 17- 1 0---/A----ea,1,A----V? /cP -*/7.? Signature of Director o 7175-6rized Repres " tative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Finance Department III ' Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Wo ks Department gr-Building Div . Engineering Div . c Traffic Engineering Div . CD Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his design e ////) g // 2. 9 r SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : Action Name : , Le/'' io- ..,/ir:" 1' ijil,:/". . :iwe Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : AZ774 Note : Responses to be written -in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :f8 I ( SIGNIFICANT I INON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature Director or Authorized Representative PROPOSED/FINAL 1.' LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/ V—SIGNIFICANCE Application No . R-306-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-434-79 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal The applicant requests approval of a rezone from G" , General Classification District, to "SR-1" , Single Family Residential . Proponent Location of Proposal Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. Lead Agency RFNTON PI ANNI NG DFPARTMFNT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS C3 is x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of /environmental significance : This declaration has been issued for rezoning only based on the compatibility of the proposed use with the existing uses and that the site has not been previously considered by an area-wide zoning review. Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/ final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Plann 'f- g D . ecto Date February 27 , 1979 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5 -76 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: ® Finance Department 0 - Fire Department 410 Library Department Park Department I 40 Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div . Q ffic Engineering Div . Qf Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his design. / gap 67 gz _rtiedo . e :#09 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Application No . : Action Name : e e:,/e' 1, e/ Please review the attached . Review requested by (date ) : 7 Note : Responses to be written in ink. J REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment : // L- SIGNIFICANT I NON SIGNIFICANT ' ity'7,?'`ram comments : . e`*4,,,//` AS .e /-_--72 esf/G4'=, U.V 22- 4ice J177G 4-.vl9 //'S`i?LG-'i iu/v /tS %-Cci//Pe_=o g 4 i2 e-A_- e6c-.e//LC /fi cam' ce_. //r w,C'—/?2 4-v4 iive_ C- t eC-477+4=y u/ ,,-tG'— RcVc-e zrZr . /feG cS 7) Fi.P_c ftyo S s/v 6_ i3t fc,c7/ - I--/`/i , =-tee uUc7- 1',ec;Z/au S cd /-A-'y 724i,2 /tic C,,A..S-/-cQz.>"• A'7 i :S'/1/9e. i,1G c% A r/2./p,( Aje,,27-/7 c', So/c i6, (% 1 i /2...2' ,77,-.; Signature of Director or Authorized Represent iv`e Date ' REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UT"-- T,G"S ()EPi. I'4 SIGNIFICANT I NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : INTS 5 6011.115hJ"1 w+I-L- a.c'QL+i2c: A i nTi 21^n 1n! !rd.ws• iOA!, I /54,r 1. F=u2 ".'`L. k,./Idtr( MPp i o Fv.q. No ..6-2 S& JIC6 A n,-iO3 C.CT A! 7*S -r-' C.=- 7 / 0 q6/77 Signatu e of Director or Authorized Representative Date R-306-79 Page Two main and the city would assume the cost of the oversize. The Examiner requested a final recommendation from Planning Department representative. Mr. Clemens advised the recommendation contained in Exhibit #1 would remain as submitted. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-306-79 was closed by the Examiner at 9:50 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS.& RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of reclassifying 3.34 acres from G to SR-1 precedent to subdividing the property. 2. The Planning. Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, is uncontested, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. ' Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development and no adverse comment was expressed. 5., There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. Sanitary sewer is available within 1/4 mile of the site. Staff requires the existing water main be enlarged. 7. Since annexation to the city .in 1975 an area land use analysis featuring the site has not occurred (Section 4-3014. (A) ) . 8. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map indicates the property to be Single Family Residential (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 9. The proposed SR-1 requires 7,500 square foot lots (Section 4-704) . Approximately 1/4 mile northwesterly of the site is a plat' developed near this density in an SR-1 zone. Another plat of similar density is located approximately 200 feet southwesterly in King County. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The trend of development in the general area (particularly the subdivision activity and shopping center node at N.E. Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue N.E.) appears to indicate the appropriateness of changing the zoning on the site to permit a density greater than approximately one unit per acre under the existing G zoning. This would be '. . .effective control of land use. . ." and ". . .highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the community. . ." (pages 17 and 18, Objectives No. 4 and .6, Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Report, July, 1965) . Greater density would be an " . . .appropriate use of land. . ." and ". . .proper employment, of. . .land use principles. . ." and ". . .promote. . .coordinated development of undeveloped areas." (page 9, Summary, Comprehensive Plan, Renton Urban Area Report, July, 1965) . However, the question becomes of what density is appropriate without ". . .overcrowding the land. . ." and producing ". . .undue concentrations of population." (Ibid) Little guidance is provided in the Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives regarding the amount' of density desired in_ the Single Family Residential designation .,on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Zoning regulations'contain zoning districts of SR-1 (7,500 square foot lots)., SR-2 (10,000 square foot lots) , R-1 (7,200 square foot • lots) and S-1 (7,200 to 40,000 square foot lots depending upon interpretation) . Each of these-districts meets the, density guideline of six units per acre of the Comprehensive Plan for Single Family Residential (page 5, Section 4.B. Density Plan, Renton Urban Area Report) : But more specific guidance as to which of the four zoning districts is most appropriate is absent. Exercising". . .land use principles. .. " and "coordinated development. . . " (page 9, Ibid) the solution most compatible with adjacent development.appears to be SR-2. Large lots dominate the land use pattern in' the area. Lot sizes of 7,200 square feet would be less •compatible with these' large' lots than 10,000 square foot lots of the SR-2 zone. SR-2 ,would not bean ". . .unwarranted infiltration of incompatible uses which. would contribute to 'premature decay and obsolescence, and prevent the development of orderly March 8, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE_ HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Francis J. Briere FILE NO. R-306-79 LOCATION: Vicinity of 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. • SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a rezone from G to SR-1 to allow subdivision of the property into a three-lot short plat. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval to SR-2. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 1, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The, hearing was opened on March 6, 1979 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported. that the' Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the ,Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional' exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit 43: Site Plan for Proposed Rezone • The Examiner requested additional testimony from staff. Responding was: Ron.Olson Utilities Division Public Works Department Mr. Olson corrected Section F.'1. (Public Services) of Exhibit #1 'which states that a 12-inch water main extends north-south on the east side of Duvall Avenue N.E. adjacent to the subject site, and .he advised that only a 3-inch water main exists to serve the subject property. He noted that extension of water lines would' be required either from the south or north, and referenced a previous short plat request, File No. Short Plat 047-77 - Petet, which had been approved. by the Examiner on July 11, 1977 subject to participation in a future water line extension project on Duvall Avenue N.E. The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Francis J. Briere 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Briere indicated certain concerns regarding the report. He advised the purpose of the • request .to allow subdivision of the property•to construct a single, small residence for his own use: • He stated that 'other residents on Duvall Avenue N.E. had'been.allowed to develop their properties without requirements of water line extension, and 'he requested the same .privileges and rights for his own development, noting ,that if full, responsibility for the installation costs were imposed, subdivision of the property would not be feasible. ' Mr. : Briere also Stated: that a maximum of 10 residences would be utilizing the existing water line which ,shotUld not exceed the capacity of utilities. . The,Examiner requested testimony. in support or opposition to the request. There was no response. ' Responding to Mr: Briere's concern regarding installation of a 12-inch water line, '.Mr. Olson clarified the departmental request for installation of an 8-inch water . R-306-79 Page Three growth patterns.." ' (page 17, Objective NO. 1, Land Use Report) . this would constitute effective control of land use. . ." (Objective No. 4, Ibid) . And SR-2 would be the " .•.highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the Community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place inwhichto : . .live. . . " (Objective No. 6, page 18, Ibid) . (Section 4-3014. (B) ) . 2. The land use, and zoning patterns have not been established for this area, leaving a great amount .Of room for arbitrariness in this recommendation to the City Council. Various densities and lot sizes can be found in the area, which is characteristic of a recently annexed, undeveloped area. The Examiner's recommendation is not intended to set a ,pr.ecedent or, establish the land Use/zoning g pattern for this area but is a response to the specifics of this particular application. The pattern should be the subject of, Planning Commission and City Council review pursuant to an' area wide zoning analysis. 3. The recommended SR-2 was not specifically considered at Or during a 'previous area land use or zoning analysis (Section 4-3014. (A) ) . RECOMMENDATION: Approval of a reclassification to SR-2. Separately, it is recommended that the Planning Commission and City Council review land use and zoning of this'area. In addition, .appropriate guidelines for establishing single family residential densities might be reviewed for possible inclusion in the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. ORDERED THIS 8th day of March, 1979. L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing. Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day.of March, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: Francis J. Briere, 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 8th day. of March, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M.' Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division , Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, 'Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 22, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that' thedecisionoftheExaminerisbasedonerroneousprocedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or ;the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from .the date of the Examiner's decision.. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied' upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing. fee' of $25.00 and meetingotherspecifiedrequirements. Copies of this•ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's' office.; first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office_. 6 G 4.. 06. , •::*.1it.: , .,:. ,.. .., 4, 1.71.II4) • 1 . t J 11 f: re:,. i • f of, ... . 1, ..• -....... I I t aia ri t i.; ta+ 1 1gr. • • 1 0. N.'.. 4. it lc.. {yam jk; 4y gol •I rt syQ f s fi" 5 r' r r A' ' r: t P s u ic;i"R' ' svy{afisFi .'d -•• i?t.r ri t i:-wj • +. I- - --. 1..• qArliN. .' ' :10 :•;,.,., - Af.' ril"; c . 1 - W r"- ;' X ci ir 1 Tr ' x A.. r 1'.4.,,,: ; ,..ter. y I s sa t 51 tl u: AIA a 7sty l 1 r • 1. 1• — .I fo` tIg a! • 1 1. I , l' Ili t\i, 4 It! O I• li, l+ j 1 `+ 1 y 7 r,, b", 1. fit : I .D . •'. • z700/,.• .,...„. t: :, •,.. 1•,• •. ' i) 1 . t.1, . c... ••••.•,. 1/41 ii '• 1,4 J. I l ' raj• L b i t t, 1 i. 1l,, it i C11 31 eta' k. 1 S' Jt, Ysr I:,iE,' 1,. I• a i' o { sir i':;...'... t .. "' r, 4''.. i . :. 1., : F,R, i N. i! h Y ry 1 _ 1 t 1 ' J 1. i' Y,. r l Yt Il: t th n'. n r:l 1.+ aY Ci Iiu Gv< tia 9 1 r nq , YI" 7", ry 3jL, c•. fiil r. r t, r; t Ott iF- 4 ` dtt, Y. 1 r. l t Ar p-: E f. FI. i, x t'+ e j7 n 8. t ` 4 alea il. i: 1 l tt 3 g i; f! u:r', i f' 3 f u i i,r' i" k. fix b i i, 4 A 7,ai tY, a' t' r. r' 4ii k„ e 9t J'x: 1. 5i li'` I; r 1 d ^. G r'' 2 a• 3i 1 dti Y Y' f: 1 , i r'' i 1. t' SA i. ram. i. 3, t fit. 1, k t`^ V t' i t9`, tip r rr-- t,i w> J, eke' fitt L• S 1;"'' 1. t' k-e EM. 4 F t„ 1 i!` t, ii '.. AI';. is m t Ys r or, a R. f, Vi yy xt n. x., Li it: xl. iA Y q, e 1", f $ t+,, v' 4ttY .,' t. e:;",...: F .„".. S` a` RPf:•:' n t- ., ft1Y:'" ., . i ..- ___. -. .._ s_..-,.. v.. u„-„_ e a r I/ AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 8th day of March 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this A& day 19 nr\ . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Francis J. Briere; R-306-79 The minutes contain a £Lst ob the patties of necond) OF . R4, Arek V V V z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO: RENTON,WASH. 98055 n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER o90A... o L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 9gT D SEP1 OP March 12, 1979 . Mr. Francis J. Briere 1800_ Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton; WA 98055 RE: File No. R-306-79; Francis J. Briere Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Briere: . It has been brought to my attention that my recent recommendation of March 8, 1979,. contained an error .which I would like'to correct. Conclusion No. 1 found that zoning of SR-2 was most appropriate for your property. . It was stated that SR-2 was a single family residential district requiring 10,000 square foot lots. This is in error, for SR-2 is a duplex, not single family, residential district. Therefore, my final recommendation to the City Council must be changed to SR-1, single family esidential .district , requiring,7,500 square foot lots for ccri orman'ce to the Comprehensive Plan per: Conclusion No. 1. Because of this change in my recommendation, the appeal or. reconsideration period is extended to March 26, 1979. If no. appeal is filed, the recommendation will be placed on the City Council agenda of April 2,, 1979. Respectfull L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Director; Public Works Director City Clerk City Council City Attorney . OF R4 A THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 niiIL rn o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 O L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 0 94, FD SEP1e.1.0 March 19, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-306-79; Francis J. Briere Request for Rezone. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced rezone request, dated March 8, 1979. Also attached is a letter written to the applicant on March 12, 1979, providing corrections to the previous recommendation. The appeal period for the application expires on March 26, 1979, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of the letter of correction. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on March 27, 1979, and will be placed on the Council agenda on April 2, 1979. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. S i c ly L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk t OF RA r o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI • MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 co L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 O P q7. klp SE0- March 27, 1979 Mr. Francis J. Briere 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No, R-306-79; Francis J. Briere Request for Rezone. Dear Mr. Briere: This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved on March 8, 1979 and subsequently revised on March 12, 1979, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Coucnil for final approval. You will receive notification of final approval upon adoption of an ordinance by the City Council. Sincerely, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Renton City Council 4/2/79 Page 4 Consent Agenda - Continued Damage Claims Claim for Damages was filed by Douglas H. Wraith, 4302 186th SW, D. H. Wraith Lynnwood, for damage to auto allegedly caused by Police vehicle in amount of $211 .60. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. H. McGinnis Claim for Damages was filed by Henna M. McGinnis, 517 Kirkland NE, Broken Glasses for personal damages due to fall , alleging uneven sidewalk. Injury Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. . Travel Letter from Chief Darby requested authorization for two members of Police the Investigations Dvn. to attend annual Western States Crime Conference in Sacramento, Calif. on 5/7-9/79; also requested advance travel funds and registrations fees in amount of $674. Funds budgeted. Right of Way Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested resolution Relocation adopting the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Procedures' Acquisition Policies as required by RCW 8.26. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. (See Resolution #2263) Consent Agenda MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS Approved PRESENTED. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Association MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER, PAY 1979 DUES TO ASSOCIATION of Washington OF WASHINGTON CITIES IN AMOUNT OF $6,382 FROM UNANTICIPATED Cities REVENUE. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: SHINPOCH, PROCTOR, PERRY, CLYMER; 3-NO: STREDICKE, TRIMM AND SHANE. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER, REFER MATTER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Richard Neglay, 656 Lind Ave. NW, expressed displeasure with the Down Zone development of Blocks 58 and 59 between NW 2nd Ave. and NW 2nd Requested and Place with 86 unit condominium as being inappropriate for sing)e Opposition family residential neighborhood and referred to previous petition Filed to submitted to the City bearing 300 signatures opposing the develop- Condominium ment. Mr. Neglay asked the City to down zone the property from Development R-3 and R-4 to R-1 in same manner as Renton Hill was rezoned. Lind Ave. 1NW Mr. Neglay stated he would put his request in writing and submit same to the Mayor and Council . 'Councilman Stredicke recalled events re Honeydew Apts. when application had been made for building permit or permit issued, Attorney had advised the matter was out of Council 's hands. Public Works Director Gonnason advised that application has been made for the building permit and detailed plan submitted today for construction. Planning Director Ericksen noted change in area's Comprehensive Plan to single family residential however, present zoning on property R-3 and R-4. Assistant City Attorney Kellogg asked time for further study, however he felt that the application is deadline vesting rights of developer and upon inquiry by Councilman Stredicke, Kellogg explained the City could institute a .building moratorium against future applications but not against current applications. Councilman Shane asked about streets in area and Public Works Director explained builder is required to provide adequate access by widening of Lind Ave. north- erly 700 ft. to two-lane and providing minimum of 20 ft. width to Taylor; explaining that upon mitigation of adequate access and provisions re vertical profile concerning obstruction of view for uphill properties by the developer, non-significant impact declara- tion was signed; further that cost of relocation of any utilities would have to be born by developer not City and grades would have to meet specifications for emergency vehicles. MOVED BY STREDICKE, 90-Day Building SECOND SHANE, DECLARE A 90-DAY MORATORIUM ON MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION Moratorium for IN THE NORTHWEST SECTION OF THE• CITY FROM TAYLOR AVE. NW TO THE Construction of WEST CITY LIMITS AND' RENTON AVE. TO THE NORTH CITY LIMITS TO ALLOW Multiple REVIEW OF TRAFFIC ACCESS, EMERGENCY SERVICES AND DRAINAGE IN THE Dwellings AREA. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR DRAFTING OF RESOLUTION. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested the City Clerk make copies of discussion available to the Building, Planning and Engineering Departments. 1 1F.A. it: Ei ( 77 Renton City Council 4/2/79 Page 3 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued Ordinance #3305 An Ordinance was read appropriating $995 from unanticipated revenue Appropriation re Traffic Safety Commission Grant to Police Patrol Dvn. for Re Breathalyzer breathalyzer. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Follow- ing readings, MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES EXCEPT COUNCILMAN SHANE. CARRIED. The Ways and Means Committee report recommended reading and adoption of the following resolutions: Resolution #2258 A resolution authorizing Mayor and City Clerk to execute agreement Railroad Funds re allocation of Federal Railroad Protection Funds re SW 43rd for SW 43rd S. 180th) from E. Valley Rd. to W. Valley Rd. (joint project with City of Kent) , was presented and read. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2259 A resolution was read setting date of 5/14/79 for public hearing Vacation of R/W for vacation of portion of right-of-way west of Springbrook-Talbot West of Talbot Rd. , south of S. 37th St. (E. Valley Medical Short Plats) . MOVED VAC-6-79) BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2260 A resolution was read setting date of public hearing 5/21/79 re Street Vacation vacation of portion of 89th Ave. S. between SW 21st St. and SW 23rd 89th Ave. S. St. as petitioned. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE VAC-7-79) RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2261 A resolution was read setting date of 5/14/79 as public hearing Street Vacation for vacation of a portion of South 6th St. , east of Mill Ave. S. S. 6th St. as petitioned. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE VAC-8-79) RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2262 A resolution was read setting date for public hearing 5/21/79 Street Vacation re vacation of portion of Camas Ave. NE located between NE Park Dr. Camas Ave. NE and Sunset Blvd. NE. as petitioned. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND VAC-9-79) PERRY, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2263 A resolution was read adopting the Uniform Relocation Assistance Uniform Procedures dated 3/79. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, ADOPT Relocation THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows items included: Briere Rezone Hearing Examiner decision for rezone of property located in the R-306-79 vicinity of 1800 Duvall Ave. NE from G to SR-1 , known as the Francis J. Briere rezone. Concur and refer to Ways and Means Committee for ordinance. Intent to Annex Letter from Boundary Review Board of King County gave notice of proposed annexation by the Cascade Sewer District (No. p-228RR; Resolution 989,990) of .area south of the City Limits south of Victoria Park and east of Talbot Rd. S. Refer to the Public Works Director for recommendation to Council . Cascadia Letter from City Clerk Mead reported receipt of 75% annexation Annexation petition, certified valid by the Planning Department reporting Vicinity of signatures thereon represent ownership of 79.94% of the assessed Union to 140th SE;valuation, at least 75% required by law. The Council authorized Honeydew School circulation of the petition at public meeting on 10/23/78 and the to SE 128th letter recommended public hearing date of 4/23/79. Street Vacation Letter from City Clerk Mead reported receipt of petition from Alec R/W Sunset Blvd Bakamus requesting vacation of right-of-way, 25 ft. strip outside NE Sunset Blvd. in area of Jack in the Box and bowling alley; 100 filing fee received. Refer to Public Works Department, Board . of Public Works and the Transportation Committee for determination regarding appraisal and retention of utility easements. Also refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution setting 6/4/79 as public hearing date. Concur. CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3309 AN.ORDINANCE•OF THE•CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING 'CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT.(G-1) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESI- DENCE DISTRICT (SR-1): R-306=79 WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about February 9, 1979, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about March 6, 1979, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Single Family Residence District (SR-1) as hereinbelow specified; subject to the findings, conclusions and decision dated March 8, 1979, as amended by letter dated March 12, 1979; the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein. Said property being located in vicinity of 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. - Fran Briere property) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 16th day of April, 1979. e741 /_11-41),,4, res Mead,City rk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 16th of April 1979. Eharles J. elaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Date of Publication: April 20, 1979 2) 0 3309 EXHIBIT "A" ORDINANCE NO. 3309 TRACT 2 JOSEPH P. MARSHALL TRACTS RECORDED IN VOLUME 38, PAGE 30 OF PLATS RECORDS OF KING CO. WASH. , LESS THE NORTH 147.84 FEET OF THE WEST 120 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT. I EXHIBIT "B11 ORDINANCE NO. 3309 II 1 r ite iis• i:,;t 1.. ,,t" :.:.•:•....,....„, i: a 1: ..,..., 4,..-.- S: i.44v, h____.' L___ It I 4' , cr i • (fII 1III I I , f: 4AA/ 11. OW . i" ' . . z 19 41/441r FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: 4' 2 TO: , 4-- wriV ATTACHED Yccn 8Y/.ei/-Z FOR:3Y ac -z RETURN FILE TO CITY CLERK 366 . / 9 OF I II 0 THE CITY OF RENTON Z • MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 cZi ma CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 90 o CITY CLERK 0' v1 M P SEP April 19 , 1979 Francis J. Briere 1800 Duvall Ave. N. E. Renton , Wa. 98055 RE : Rezone R-306-79 Dear Mrs. Briere , The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, April 16 , 1979 ' . has adopted Ordinance No. 3309. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M. C. City Clerk DAM: j"e'b d b . Enclosure1 I'...-,......:•:'..:-..-,,..;....--...,-,,,'.. .','•'..'..,....-.,: ... '' ' '.,,• ;',..:::,•',,-'-..,...,'.:".'•-•-•.•-:=. 4',....-, . 3:;..,,,/,-.. ..(•••-• '.::."..;,•,,--••, I-•' :,...:',,,.-,,,........ '- ".:').-'''.,:-"'.:.'•••'. 1•.;-?.....,,--,.-'.:-.••.,-., y4-',..„':-.',':-..::::.,'-;:•.: W.:-•;::--,', . .', f,-:. 1,•;,.,.,'''''.,"'-•::','-'----,.:"--.,,,:.-,;;-.•? i-J,'•,•,•••.:,-:. -. i, .,' -- r',,,:-.;,..- '.....,-.-;,, l' .: '' ..., 2--,-,:f2,-...--;:./;:•;'-•.;:,,::::.';'.:...,-:',.';'.'.'.." 1;', .,..,..-:. ---•';',.... ',. ,.. , , ' ..''''• ''':. ',:- : 1):;;:::::,, :.],"::,: i:-;.: VQ.:,...:1"', ::•-,:;::::.','; i.-: ',--...';,: Hq:_;','' ''.4.*,..,''.::.:,...:;', '._ ''',,, ''.:'„„;:".'-:-' '`''..' 4::' ''' :„ -.',-,.....:'-..,:.,-'.._..: c•.-..:-'(,.:.,--..-.-.,...-.•''.`:., 4.•..',.,:.:•',.•.);.',•,,.,.,..,,•-. l,-•,., T,,'-,-..'.•,:-‘-,'•:''.", i,,-•‘,_-,.'.,',,-,,:.'..''....'-,,,',.:-',-.,: 1,„, n.',-,,'.:.'.--.'..'.•,:..,'-,',.,:,- 3,,:,.,,• ...'.,.,,,.,•.....,.'.'..,..:,',:.,...,.:,•,'.,-..,,.•.,,.• ,,„''.,: 4.-,,•:: H,.•.,,,.• i..•,.,,..-',.. i; 7',.,,--:,'.'..•..,,'..'.'.".-,•-, 7,•'.;.'.:':-.,.,- H::,,.,..;:,.,,:':.,,,','.:'..,-,-.,-- H', s-',,.,.,.-:,:-.;-..,'-:,:-:.-..,.:• r-'.'.:,..,•,..-.,..--.,•_,.',i,"'',..-:.= s..;,"-',:--.,; l..';:.,,, i,...-'.:••,,',.•,:'-,--,,:.:-:•.)..,.:.,.•‘"'.,...:-.,-,,-..'':--,• .,•:-:-.-.,-,':,.',',;',,.: f‘.,.-:-':;, 4:•.:,'.-',',,.:•:,-.',,.; 7-„.-..-••.-',;:‘'.::-,.'.,,,,•,',.,.;;.,.:-.•,",:..,.:::.,•..-:-,-',;.',.'..''.'..-.,.,--,...,..,,:,.'=-,,._''....',:.:' 7,',-,,,'',.,. 4:',...':,',.;,.:. 1: T,.:.-'.:.,-,'.'-.,,',.-,.:.-.,,,',,,-;'_ v, i e-.,:,,'-:,.,' 1.',,-•:.-.-.,,":'-:, 4-.,,-.,<,.,-..,',-',:.,,-.,...-,,:,';-::.',,...'.•„,,,'..'.-.-.,:', 7.:.,.'.-.',.'.:-.'.,,..'-.,.*;,'' 2::,,-,,..,-.'',,-.;•--,...':•:.'_'-:',',':::',.•,,.'-„''•,,,,.., i,''-':.',,„','',.-;•,''-.-''.,.,"''::,.-,,,,;....:'--.'.!,:,-.:-,:'';.';"'.,.-',,".....',...:.-..:,'',,,,'.'.:.-..,":.•.-.;,,.',,,,,:_',:,,,,,'•.,:."-'.':,,.,:,,,-: g''..'...,,....,.•,•-„':'-'.:.-°.,,.'.-:.•-, r„-:,:.-',:;: f,•:,',-:• i.-.,.. i:.'•.;;,.,,,:,. i;.',;..;,:,'-_..,,,-•':.`_.-',-,!:•:--'.:...,,-:-.,,''.',-.:-,.:;-;,'',-,.,"'..•,,,-.:-„„,.:.,--,.--.,'.,:..„':.-,,'-,,':-:,---':-;...-'.,-,.',-,,',;::.'-:,',...:';;.-,-:., 2..•,•,.',,-.,,:,-:,,-,_,'.--•,.:---,.,.:-'.,.-'''-,-,, 6,:.,.•-.'.:.,., s-';',,-'':., 7,,,•-''•',,:.-'.--,,,'.,-,,,.:-,'-',,,-;-.:.,'.'::.,:-,-,--''.,.'.,,'.:'.,,,-,,:'-..,'.,.',.,,_-:,' s, i:',.'.;.,'.',',•-..,,;.,.',,,.',.'-::.'',•_.:,-::.„':".-..-:':,"':-,'-.,:,,• i,,..',:-,.'-'...','.„'•.;'','. E,,:,.:.',,.,-,..-",.',.'„.,:.:,'-,..,,..'.,'„''.,.,::.:.".'''.:.'-,-.,,:...';.':,:, i:-.;,...•',., I..',-,,.,,.-.':.'..,,'.,-..,,;.•,'':..'•..,.,'.-'-.:‘:.,-',.;."„•::,--,,'-. 1..'-.:.•,,',',,..,..,- j'-',,.,'..',•,,,•::,:: a.,,;,..,..,,,.',:.-,,:.,..._.„:..',;,'„,,.•,,:' q,.;,'":,-,-..':,'':.',,,'',..&,.,,"•:',..,','_.„,,•,.,.'•' 1-.'..`,'.-,,.-.,:•;.,.•,...-, i.-,'.',..,,;;-,''•.,- i',.,'...-- c-',,•:,..';." r. s-.. t,-:'.:_, k.,.-,:.:-,-..,-.',,,;'.•;.- i,....-.•;-,,,..•'-,.:,,..,„.-.,- 7, i.'.....,•'.',,••:'•.,.'.,''.-,'''.•'.:',,...„,;,•*. f, l,.,'..•:.-'..::':.:•.',...''.-.'.•,.'' i-.:.,'..,,-..-.'.:,...,,'":•;,,'..':...,,-,., s.;'..•',,.:,„.,,.,...'".,,..:..,:,',',,,:..'.:'-,..,,.,',,-'.--.-.-:•':,,.•,,•,''..,.'.-,:-..:. 7,.,.,:.„„'.-, l., 3",,-,, 1T.---.:..,,'',.•-- i.',;:.,-•,.-,,'.',.,'.'., i..`-,. t.:,-,-- v'-•: 7.,, 7.:, i.,.':-....,... 7..,.,', xi,.,;',:,'„:;'..',,.'",.._''-.-,,.,'-‘..„i.-,', F;,"..,,, i.;.[: L",:.,..:.. f,,.„-,,,‘.,..;'.-„',:.,-.,-:„-.....,-''.--._.,', i•:.--,:,.:,.' 7",-.': 1',-....:, p: J:'':-'.-„-,.,., 2,,.,•.'„.,,,--,"..'-.'-',,-,•-,-.'•'',':'::].:,.:,;,,„•-.-:,., c`,,:,,.',,;,;,,: I.,,'--,:,.!.'-':..',,,:'.' A''.:.,,-,.:,.'',','_$ i,,.-'•:,•?,,,,.."-','.•,.. r:,,.,'.,,,'-:,..'. A,.:,',•-,-''',,-.,-,',•,,-.',.:,,-'':,.-..,.::,'..'..,:•- L: i.:•',,.-•-.-.-''.,,,,.,".„;,.',.',: ig::.'-.:-,,--,:,''::,.,-'. J.-....'--...,,..-"'•,,.'.:,•'.,'-... R`-.,'•-,„-..,,.,:.--„' r..„'-:'„',.---.-,-•!!' H•..;,-,_,.,,-,•,.;,•,.,,.:,-._.-,,-,,..:';.....::. s,,...,,•,,'.•: 7,.-'.„„.'..;=-.:.-.,',.*,,,':.,'...-...,.:.,;',. l:,..::,, r',;.,:,";...:,,.,`.. t,'-].„.,-„•,.."-.,:,•...,',, j.-,..-,-'•).-"-'.•.'....•.:,.,,',:,.,,-;,..'.•,._,.-.;,,:,:,,.';.,. 4',•'„..-,-.•.,',•'.-:.:.,..,';:--::,.•-.,•_...-. 2.-',...; 4-:-...,;, i.,•',:,:.'.. 3..,',.':_-.,,*-,',,!,.-. i:-,,.'.':.,-;., i-„:,:,'..,: 4:..,•,:,. z-•..'.:.':,,''.-.--..,..,, 2.,,-•,,....,,,,' 7;.,',,:.....- 7.,'?,!?',-,''.,..'.,,..,:„.,.:.,..,,',,.:.::'.,,,,,,;,-:-'...,'',`,•.._';.••,''..,:..:-.--''',.;!.:..,.•'-'.,-.,,,,...'•;.,‘,'-,,,',•.;-•.-,..;:: 4,-.•,:, 1:;;-,"...,'.'.. 4..:',,':.‘..„..,-'",--,,..-,,„. 1-:.-.,' 1'.! I;.,-.----:-.!,,--..,•:,....',.,:,:.;.',.,'..,':,:-:•.‘.,,...,:-.„!:•,.-::.-::-',-.•-.:--.',,•,„;.-:-.:. L- 7..: s•-'•.,.‘•:.•:.'.,.,..,,,..-.-•,:.'.-,..';•:„•.,•-..,-.;:., A:,- 2-.;•-•.':-,-•--,:.!-'-....',.,•,:.[,..,.-.,...,'`.;-'-:•',,.:,:.?:,;..•:„ s.,•'.-,,-:-.;-:„,..•,„:-.':,',-',.:.,..,:.,-;,-,-.--;,-•..,.-,,•,. i'.-'.-,', 4,:'-',_-,:,,•._:',,,,:‘..,,---..:,.,:..-.:,.-,,.,, 2:,' i.',-:,..'.., 4,,-'..%..,,-.,,..•:.•-.'•,. 7 Renton City i°,,,:.,.,.-.,:.•,...-..,.-,.,.'', y., j,.',•: 3..•',, 1,;:.'-•.-,.-,-.,.,'„,.:,•--•.•.-•'.,';,.?.„,-'.,---,.•':';...... 1.,'•.. 1.-,,••,•,•.-11':., e.,.',;: 1-,-,,_•: u. 2.,-,',•.',-,,::.. i:•.;'!.,..-•-,., 1..„;,..,.-..•'..: 3':..-:,•.' 4.,.-.•...:-..•.'.'-.'.. i:-•..,„-•..' i,.:',•:,,,..•-.,.., L:.•,,-,,.'.- z:,••,.•':":',-..... v„.,.'-..',•.,:,:.. n•.--.:.- L,,._.,. A_•.,,,:.„',-,;..,..,•,'-,,•„ i.-'.',-,,.:.:•.'-.,:,.;".-:.';'..,.'..:•..,,:;..,?•,-..:,•.,':,:'.--.,..-,,..::-,; c.,..-...•'....,..-,-:'.-.--..!':--:-,-,.,...,..'..,'-'.'•,- t-‘.::',,,:-:,,.'--.•,.:..- 3:'.,..,,::.,.•;.-,-,-:-: 1.-.'','..':•., s.'-,..:,-..-,.:,':..:.:,;,..:-,,, 2,.',."-,'•.'•..:.,•, i'..,:'--,.•,• 1-'::.,:._'..,.,... i,.'.,,:•,,,.,-...,..,,.:,-..,-.,,..,.:--,-.'.-.. i:,•.-•..:.,_.:•',.;..,.,-,...-•‘,,'.-.:, r:":-.',..-''..,..',.,':,-.,',' r.),...,•.,'-,'..:-...,.,.,--•.'',,....:.-•,..•'..•,.- 4-'-..,.•..---,..,-,.:-,..,:-,,-.-',-.':-..--....,,::-,,-- 1 4t16/79 . P 9e4 014jBusinContinuedess. - Committee '0= Whole Counc-,. F.,.,, s,, T,,, H.,,'. s..- ,„,,,..:;-.,..-'.,.,.',,.• -.-.,':.;.'•,.- 4.;,,-,_'' 1-::'...,.,,-.:..-,':,- z.'-..,,„',-,.....',"..i1..-'.?.-,::±.,,,.-,--..,,,Li'.-.,.',,4.,,„..-..:,•,,; i-,...',-',•.,,,,;..'.,, t.,:".,-,•.,,.,',.•.;:,.&,-*;,,..„,.,-,:...' i,-,:,-....,,',:,_-. 4.,...•.',,,_-, s'.-,-,:..„!.,...; y.'!.,."':',.;.. 2.• L-'-:•:•,,',' 3•,:.--,::- 1-,,'-,,,,.••-.:;:...-'.....',':--';..'.-,.-•::'..,.•- i.,',,.!.,,,--,'.,-,-. r,.-,'",..•-.,.:.•,::.,,: F..,,,,.: h.,:-•„..-.:,,,,-. 1--,.,•..,-''-,:,-,-, 1,,,.;-,,,'.;',,,.‘:..',,..,-.:'::-.::.•.:,,.'..,•,,.-,;..',:,.,,'.•.,.::•,,.,:.•':.- 2,...'. 7.•„-'•-,.,•... 7,,-;-;: y.•..,,,';, P,:.':..• v',,., r--,;,,-.:,, g„..-,,•,-,•.:..,-.,_-.-''.,,,'-:.---..:._,....'-';..:„'.,_•:,.,,-.:',.:.-.,-',.',,!::,..:'''..•..,,.,...':-,.:. r4.;:-, 7',.:,,,'-'•.,,'.--'-:.,, 7...', t,-.:,-;' c';.'.,'.'..-:,, 7•,,..'-.:„,;,.-,"'-,.',..., r,-. 4,--,,..-".:„'',•.';....,'".•..-'-''-,.'.'':,:..-:,...;-,...-,, 4,':.,--'.,,„':,.---.',,,-;--'.--.-.,. c:' i,:•,-.,'--•-,.%]•'...-,-....,.-.-„;:'',:,t•-,,--,- 7-,,:'.„', 7.,,,-"-:,,.,.,...-.'••.-, 2',.-.'--...-.',-,.,, 1",,:;•,„-':..,. 1.-,-. s• f-..,'.'.:;,:-,,•.-,',,,..:•.',...,,,-, 4,..,:..-,. A,-..•,,--:,.,,-, 1,..-.--,,.....-,'_.',:,'--,-,,-:,.,',:,,,,.,-,..:=..::, i.-;',:,,.',,-:-...:'•.-.,-' S.,',.,,:=,.--'.' 4.' i‘'.,,.,)-,.-.,' t-..,;,..,':.. t'•,„..-'',.,.:,,,,-,,.,-:..,.,•. v,',,„,:.-,„!,-',, 4,•'..-,-,., A.?.., k:,,.'-:.;.-:,,',. 7::.,,;'. 0•,,,,;':,,,,,-,-.,. t;:---,,-.,.,,•-,.,,..,-% 7-. 7-;:.-;,-•'--,,,-.-'..;.,..,-•., q.-- I4',-. i,--.:': i/.,,;•.. 1, i--,-"".;.--,.,',,-. 4., r,:.,:•'"'.: r.,.,‘.,,-:. 4•, fzz.-,-;;. i.,.;'.:,;.--,',,",:..,',- 7,-. 4,-,, q',':,'- 4,,.:.,,,.,,,•-,'=:.-'",,.,:•, i,:-,-,--,,:,:-•'- i,-,,;:,,•,'-::',;-':.,..,.,. iv-.,. i-,,,,,,,. i-,•,:,'"--,'',, L'',',,, 1n•..--,.-"-„'., 7-..,.-;,--:..,:,.—',,- i, A:-:.•,,,,,-,,,-,'.•'... P-,',,-,-%.',?, i, i,:.,.- i'., J•..-.`.,.,. 1''--Ak,,...-,,,,,,'':., l,.'•'-,' f;- i.:, c.-....•,.."-, i.-,,.,,:. p- 1,''.,- k4. k',.?., i;:-•,,, k,.,::-:.:,',,..',-:,,;'•:-,_,., 7:.....-,.',... 4-!,.-..- 1-..'.- i•,..„,-,:,-; i..-' a. t-,,., qI,; r..--"„-,.-;, i,-,,,.--•,,•,.,.'',., e:,%. f- i'_,,',..',.-,:.,,..-.,,,-:"•', t.'...-...:-'..; Y..-' r,,:..,. g4..;,,..-,..:•..',.,.,,. 1•-.,,.,,,,,.‘ OI:,:-,--!-.L,:•,.,',,:, i',::..-,':.,„,',):--,,..',,--..,..,'-,!,,.-,,':,,,-,. r.,.'.-;.,: 4--),,', 1{.:-',. 1,,, i-,-,;,,'., i,.-;'.:.,,'.-, k-,..:,.-, 7,--,,„-- E.'-,-,,„,,.;-,-.: 5i;-,. f:-;.'-.,,•.,,,'.',`.,. 7'',.,„';,-.:.,,- 7:.:,' 4,;;..',',,. 7,:,.:',',, 1-,.;,,-.', t,. r',.;,„,,-,:,'-,.,,„',•: o;.,: V....,.,,',,•.. i, 1.'. r•,;•:,,;'-. l,„, r„.,''' i,,.,'•,," 4,.-,-.,'?,,,:`•,::,,,•',.,...,- Q..,'.;,,,':,•,'. 4.,- a-:„,'':- i;'_,-'.,.., 7,,',,.? i-.-,,,,-,-,.':.!• v...:,:.,:•,:,',, 4-:-.... r‘ f-..-"„. y_=.:,--,?.....:,..:. 4.'-'--.,".'-,:-: i-:,: v-.,,„,. Ti.--,-- yk,.„,',,..-:.,-;.'.,, Q,,,;..,'Yi.-.3.-, 4,,•,'-,,;,-;-.•;. l-,,',.,-,.,. n,.-.-..'',„,,,,.'.;---.,':-.., p-,..,--.:-: 1:; 4),.:",:..,,,,.,%•;,:.-..,.•-•,,;''",,,,:.',,-•,.,.,,„'• i,: i.,• 7,,.-;..:,, o,.,`,.,-.,,:',-,. z,.';:,,,:"/,-:,'.,-:;:.. k:, L,.,•...ji,.-:,.,,-"•.-,,q),,,:.'„,,:.,'::..„-..-:-.,.)•,,,',., 1',:..;',•„,,,-:,„, i.'.,.•.,,:•:..-'_,.., f,,.,:,,-,:'•.--,.:,--,..: r-;': V,'':.-'.--..,,,,--,.. v p,. 7;,-'.:.:-,_-,,,,'. s,'- T--,..,,--,,.,-.,.'-.-,'.., F:.,...,,_,.,-,..-:.' i'..:-.,•' 4',-'.,,.,-.,".....-,':;,:--,.':',',.,;:..,,,..,..,,.'..',--.:-,._,,,.,,', r.._:..,.,.,-.-,.,..,,.•.,-.-,• i, i..',,,,:--',.-,..- 0:.+.,-,.-.::..,'-..:,,'.'.-?'•..,:• f,,.:::..,. 7,; E,.'. 0'-,',,..-.,--„ 4--:-•...:-,.,,. i4',,:.: 4:,,-;:..--..,';.,..-..-,':,,,,,.-..•-,,),,.'.,.. f:..-..,--.:..:.,,,, i:,:',,.,,,,'.,,'•.,- r,,,-..,,.,, a.. 4.;,• s,-:,''. A,-,.,,:': i,,".•.,.,:,= 1,.,.,.,;" 7:.,,,':, s„),- l•.-.)?';;:. 7„,, f..,:.-,.,.,,.--.,,,,;,'-?,,,,-..,.-,,:,,,;..-,,....,:.-,.•' 7,..-,,',.,, 1-.,.:.':',-,.,.-,..?•,',,-,„:'."-.:.,,-: 1•,. 1•:;,,,.,;.:.,,:-.,.• i:.,,-!,,,,,-.,..,-'., s.•,,‘ 7,.,1t.,-,:,.,,1---., i., t:'•.'.,,-.?.,,,!,.,:..-.•.:. s,.,:-,.'-'.'-,-,'..-:;-''.,". J,- a-..:•,-;.,'..•..;:.-. z,,':•::':'-,,.',- 1.;:•,.,...,.,-.'-,.-.-,-•.',., ik,-•,-,.-;:..-c.':,.. s.'-,,.,::...--,;,..,' h?•:,%.'",.-,-,,:,.'.:,,,,.,- l.-...,..--.,- 4,:-•.:,.,,'-.•-,-,,,• 0;:' f.,- 4,:,-., 1,,,,::.,- q;,'.-,:•,::''. i-.,,..':•,i--,•„- i;,,-,. f,-,.,.„-•::"„-:--,,-..',.-,- 1!.,,-,, 7-',..-,, f.,,'.--.,, ii,,„,.',,;.:,,,;.,--..',,,.; I-.,.".,..-,,,,,..,,,.•,. 4,:;.-,,",;....;....'..,„.,..;.-„,-: i.'.---.,.:,, 1., 7':.;:'-„,.,-'-..'-..',-.,,-•..',. i•:..,..,;, i:., 7,[;.-,,-•:,'.,-:.., k-':.. 1,;'.•$:,:-..,!:,,---: 1,'•.. 1:.,,.;.,,--••._...'-,„'.- i-,,':-::; 3.;.-,-,; t.-.--.,,".''.' i,:„_„,.. r:,-.:'•-,-.' 2..'-',-•-„,-' f;;-.-.-,' 2-- y-,-', 4-,- i-,•..,"-,'„•,',-.::'-..:..',:‘-.,::.,--:,,,,::..,,.,'„,.'.,:, 0, i„-..-,..,:,,-,..,-.,:.,::;,,,.'.,,'.-:':.,,.,.-.'. T.,,.',..-,:,-,.:,•,,,-.;-,,.:„.,,:'.,.-,.- 3„:,,,,,•,:,.-.'. i.-,.,, j: y:., 17‹--.-::,'-.. s.:.„-' f'.'',_-_..---,,",-),',.. f,.. i•,„,..?:-':... i,-,.:.,,.'„'-.:,';.,.,...,.,-.-..,... lfi,.•,.-,„.,'••.,•,.';-,„ i.',,' v,• e._(,,•',-,.:?--.:;.--.: y.•:,•.'.,;',.,,-... c..!;.- t,..-'•, 1-,..,•,: 1'':.•.,,':,-.-•.,.: 7:.,,‘.•,,-,-,:'..„,- 1'..„. s-,,- y.-,•.,.'.,'-,,%,. 4....,,•... i.,':,-.:,.'',. 7,-,..,-]•,.- q,.-:.,,,,,;.,-'•',-,-.,,-•,,. 1.,.•.•..•,-.-,,:...,,-.•.-,.•,.:,.-;,,. J•-.. l,,.[.-•,,:•, i.,,:-'=-:,...;..•...,..-.,-;.::,.',- 1:. f,:..,.:.,.--.'.. y1L-,,.,,•,,.-q,.-.:,...,-,-.,', J,-., i,,',.',",,,:-,''% t:',: 4,,,„,,:-,.--..,:" L.).,:;-,',--',-,•.;.,.':.,.•••..'..:,- i1•',•., i'.-' i: iv,•„:,.-•-:' J!:,, F,,.,,:.,,•..-.,-,,!.,,'',:'..-.'.,.-'--'.., c,,;:,,.-.,':,-,,...,:.,- 4;.',.. i.„'..,:•...;: k-,--,.'- e.-,•.:,',-, R,-.',-:--.,,..,-,:,,..:,::,,..::-, i''.'-,-'':-.,-.-.,: k--'.', 1.,,'.„•.::.:,.',',•-- 7'.,,,..,,-'. r- y•-.- r,- T,.,-.,-.•,,'.:,:-..''.,.-- I.,,..--..,;-.•,,'),:.,..,,za-..., 7',', t,'' i, 1..•.:. 7.-•,..,;-':.,,,',!,-.,,_,'-„,,.,.,.-:.:,',-,,,-,;::-. z: 1.'•.-...•:.-.;„,:,; v.,,:.,,, f..•--,,',-`,'.-..,,",,-•,"•,:,', J,,;.,-,??..:-!,-,'...,,--.,-....,„,-..',:,,.::.:.,‘:,...,.;-::-.-,:-- f. f..;„,-,•."..;,;::.:.-;..;,..,.....: 1X:.,,,,-[.„,,•::-::'.,!.-,,.;-i: q'.:.,. 7.',-‘„, 4.-:._:.,-.,, r--.,,:,...,-,,-,-.„-.-:-..,-_-,;,•.:'-,... I.,,!.,,:-,,..-.',•.:-;'., 7..:.,';-,.'...'--.,.•,.-,,,:-. f;:-:-••,.'-,-•..-..,:::..:i-;,.::,...-'-;,--,:' s•, k,-.: F...•:,,-.•.,,..--',.;':-.:.•.-...--. 7,,-'..,,•.--•,:,...,:•-.,-:.,,:.,-.,:-,:‘,,...,-'-.:,--.:,.' 7,::.$,-.•-,•',.. 0.-„.•.,',' i•-,,,.:%,,,•-.,-:.-.' 4;.",:.;.-,:-.':„,,,..,-.." 1,--: i„ Y,,.-., 4..'..-,..:-;....-....-. 1.,.,';',...::-,, 6''„,.-.,-: i,:',,',• 7::,;,",. w2'.-. i.,,,., 1...,•:,:,-,,.'..:.,-'.' 7.;.,,!•.,;.;'-.':.:,,..-:-.-.,.':,.,.-....:',.,. K,...-,.:.:-•..,-,-..•,.,,-,,-•;.-.•,.-:--',.,::. 1i.,-.r.--•,-,,•.;._,„..•.-.-.:',-''.:.;-'•,.,-•.:,•,'-,;:,,,. 1?.,.--.,.. i„:-,., 1 i,':'.--,•„-"••::---,::."..,,',',-::...,:,..' H'-:'',,,..,.'.:,. i.-. i..,, l.','.;•;:.,,:.•.:,,...'-„..::,,'='-i.:;-..',-,:,..'.'..''-..',,•--':-;••,.-,-,,,:-,:-,:,--+'::,:-,.:..,.-,:,-•';,--'-..-'.-''-,: t.:..'.,.,..',.,.-:.'.•,',,.,,.•. i.•, A,:..,:.,:.:,,:-:.',..':--,„:..,',,.,,-,:',','.',-,,, 7.•.,.;:,..,.'--..;.-• 1:,-'.-,';•;"'.;••',,.:',-'',.:.'.,-.•,.,,,,-..:,'-,.:-'-.,:,,"....., i',•.-.,.:'.,..,.::.-;,'.,-.,'-'.".;,,'-..,"t',,--',, i--?... r1,.:,.:,'--,-.',-,-;.--.---,',,. 5.„-.. e.-----...;,--,..-;;.•,.'.-''..--',,.'.,.,::.:,.•,:.,...-.,-.,.;:-;-;„-,,.,.,..; i'=,::,-,::...•."":'.:: 4:,.:-.::..:-;,„.....,•.,..:. v-•. y-.. 1.... e.,.,-,,•-.:..-'..'..', I,.'':,.'':, f,- 7,...,"-.:- I..,•:,.„ 4-_„..,".-....-.,,-'-''.,;,..,..',..,..-,'',.:.,..:,,:,',,,,'.,-'.,,....--, l:.,-.,,•,.`-,.'-.;.-:.-,• of t. i. i.',..,--.,.',,..'., i....,..•,-'-.',','',:.,.-,,•',-...-..-..-,',.- n'.,...-.•.. 4.''.:;..•'..-..,-'-,:- 7,•...-.•':-,--„,•,.:,..--'-:-.:-,---.,.. e....'.-.'..•.,,..,:,': 1—.....:---•-.,-.-'„-,-.--..-•.,-'-,''',,'.,-.....•-,,..w.'-,•..'..'..-,:..-,•-.•'.','.-_...•::..,. w.'"!,, i.•_'..,-:,..‘:.,-•.,.,'• i-.-•,,.,,'-";..,,,'-. h.'•-'.--:•',.--.-:, L'':',..,...:.',„.„:.:::,.:,„.:. 0,'.,•,,-...;..,:'..,:.;;,,;.,:-,-.-:..., i.-•..,•-":.,,„•;',':, 1• f.':'•.i.:,,::.--."..-.-'.-.,.....,';, e Report iORbit7idyl4i19' ieic, ft06, mop4617ir • reported: dela ,•.i lan 4„..''-;',.'..,, i. j.-----.' 1,•.-'':.-!::., n at aski. g,GPhs1dera4ThR,Rf .6ie' Building reorganization 66„...t,..:'.,.-'..•,-,,,-'...,,-.-.•-''.-,,...,•,•,-,,'--•..,-••-,,,::,;,,•:,.•.,...•'-,.'- 1.,, i-,.',---•.`..' 3:.,••.::.-'..'----,,:,,"„,.--,':.-., i.,.'.,.,-..,,,,.•,-..:.:;-'.„ s...',. f,..'.•.. 1 Building budget presentation; and tt , tp4ri3natrPc1Ckehad requested Reorganization Informat19nJ1i,AMva0Si of the byg?et :hearings. (Information) Fire Department The Committee of the Whole report recommended that thes6b?ett-.-„,-•:."-,:•:'°.-•":..:'';..''.:,.',.,..:'..,:..:.,,.•.,-'-.,.•,.:-,• 1YF.,,•-.',,;',-..',:.,:.-'•:;.„':. F5-..',,,„'.,,.':-,. 1. i:,-,.:,`, i„''•..•-„.,-'•,::'..: i,::;:,..:'•,.:-. 4',.'''..,..•;.,,:.;•-..,,:-..:-,.,,..'„-:,...:•' Y:..-..':.,•'-...,,'-,-'-'. v,, f Consolidation8 consolidation of F4ierDPPartme9ts• aid fire P. tect'onsOutnof Protection for the. city ,?e -,err04 ,t0,,he Public Safety Committee for. rFcdmmend:.:-;..,':,,,, k'-..., Ly';.,':.:,.,,,•:..-,,.-,,--; A,'.•::•: 1,,..,:-..;,.'-,•...:.„-.,.-,...:-:,.. q?-,,,,:.-,.:„'..-•:,.,,....;,.,,„,.-,'- p:•.'':- f..'.. f-'•-:',,.,''--= L..':.'•-?.,,'..,:'-,'-::.,. F-,:.,•...--, t',,..-:,'.-,.,'',,' V,;.-",, 1.•, a,-..,, fg,,,,..,',:-':;..,.,-,•:;.,:,.-.','',:.:... i,;., 4',,.::,, f: k-.,:'-.,,',.,:.-:."'••-.,.?•-,,. i,,,,-;..,'.',.,',-.:•:%,...... i!.-,,",-.,,,'..-,-,... i:, f--..,-,,,/',,,,;.•,:,'.:'.,'..,,.',.--.,!..,::,,.•?' s..,,;,:; k-.;., 4...%',,-.: A'••!,,.,,:'.',::-.,',.„:-.'.,,.,--.-,,•.,'.-_ pit , titY ti0n,to: cPItti) : : i0v6b ,EY2FERR\ , SECOND „-y4;‘ REFER MATTER Ta,_ ktiBYYGET- co147t, , cLRR ,P' Spheres of 1he' i4por;:i4c9aede° :tha. .bie :$,uJe6t6f Spheres of Influence Influence be referred to- 4he; 40e1P : iearS .copiit_.e .for the appropriate resolution stipulation adjusted to incorporate the aent99 :schoOi. et5trict., The report state ,thj, c0iml,tee, as7411e4 „ hatta9leementat +his; t17..di 1o4- consii4te - financial commitment nor were ther . areaswhic1 were not negotiable at a 1a. r:Aate : 9ovEb-EY SHINPOCH, SECOND C. ym51 ,2CoNcp IN,tEcb011pATI0N -c„ 1RiEP' Trash' Receptacles The rePPt s4ted, thai, my9r„,.ia0rentl 'ex014tneu a need .rur-65 now trash receptacles- wfth, 4 ,0rchaSa oripe. 9f $5',c2.23 and t0% co recommendedi4+pe • that the matter be referred"t° the Lonunj "y Services Committee. MOVED ) . 0 ymER,'sFcOND'TRJmm, .c9NCUF 'IN THE REPORT. 5CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ways, and . vers waYi249,, iei6*ItFtee" Chairman. Clymer presented report ecgi. CO ml,tee„RePoi: neidlhg-secpny,anTOV1,riadln9 , f .t - following ordinances Ordinance f3'08 (F(tt . 7pal- raP „44Ai7 ) , 041Pay Rezone A9,0rdi646e, Y,t1rea4.4 ,41i49211g9la s1 ,ati frou General 41:78 E62t hht,rnj6: i)aI. b1 iy1tt; 47t, k9- :97° rty locatedin vicinity hf- 620A5W-; th -it, 'I$1ow : ;§" *het)41Ray property MOVED RI sEC0Nu -ciy)4,i ;Ai0Pl„ili700p17rt,A5 ?1EADf : ROLL: CAL : ALL' AYES., 01er7 ' , 7 , k4 icinan.e„#3309 ' Atroru4ianc §: rg404reioIIrgcr4orerty,frm: r:1 General to Single Briercl ' FaMt1' .Residence: t.1q' SR43410ca4, d,0, ,the v1 inity .of• 180u Rr306779 ttv&11, AE, -klown1a?. Tr# , 1erZpr,peetYl, rDVEi BY PERRY, SECOND ctIME", iADePf,IH-4tRjiNnkcE, READ. ROLL CALL, All Ayes Except CARRIED. Ordinance 43310 An'ordihance ,4aS4444' .44is .rfAng, $10?00„.forromISP: 1;tl ,6, ttiey t t109 eg4idiPg ,ma141e$ . d -qC674'crnt,6c compensation claims in Hayes) ia01ctL" fav0r, af :iav4s34e9lan4caf"kn :; ly"tj' B(: 1DrmK,SECOND c1NiER* boR".A$ :RE8NAot : ,cA;0; , ALL, te( tXq,h:§r EhtCKE• CARptfP' First,Re41/2ig 1h. praiqq:"6$ 'ret *940n1 § ,projgrty4rPP' ' i811i ;34. , iess AlthPfi„R!2016 : in9 ‘R1' 10O809p?the,so4tfrae5t,PH•er: 0f!S1hsel Blvd. NE and RT272778 LA61_64tg52Av- ,iN::;, 010, pfS-o4t4Yff,ProPrtt, MOVED BY ct,iLk SECONDIN ,RECOMMENDATION :6F' EicurmiTTEF AND kcrFc4 itQ4ti4Av§)140- MEANSicoM,1TTE,EoR= nNE WEEK. CARRIED. Resolution; I20i Ways and ,;6rsciilki0r! ooT1dr,rea . 4,4n4- adoptioif9f Alley Vacation following resolutions: Betwe4 ,cw; 12tf , ir091tti64, 1Av,r4Ciett,64 .44iecf; ditli7§: for public hearing ani ?,4 -I3th " t6;01i4defPeiii0ntvrktugfe- M410?fo7, 401t1on of alley VAC'4 11, 79 1ozitq81odt ,eei' f1 ,,4h'4,er $4 :13, i:$t54ei „ 0YP, 8y Cfym .oi gEChktvgt? „itpyri ,A99kt1it' t8u1trIY' ,AS ;609. , tAl 'b; Resolution :I- 66- k, ,is°404cn,WaS !re,d-trio$ft4iPR1t0012ifr 0,edrt1i9ent. zFund Fund Transfer tc ;4, te9 v0i4A, f0“) p4,mgrvP „ 1970 .A$ 4c{atTP6 „0f -Washington AWC.Dues Cities OrYFce, fee, (*s,78: per :1970; r01-d001iif?2„1000):4Q„ct , 3T ,814MOi<sE;hND4t41Nru644- t01tURYrt,AEbOT1 " rIAN AND ADOPT5THF: kESYLJJioN01§ Reka;4ee'4ater,4etdn' ED4nrpEclt0y. tc„407,HAN , ,c9iici2 ,R. ,L's; ;CARRIED. -c06ii4 recessed.at'10.35K;31494,ip56iVPPec - t„10:4s. P•m. RP_L. c 14 Al ti1,Mqmiets4 .eSe9tkfPloifhg,ii9ss19i,9n .6syti ' ,, t •,..•.-..•.-,.',:...`-',,.•'-•.-,.,.;:?;.',-,-. q,,:'.-,;,:',./ i, r„.,-:,/',:.',••.,,.,,-:.,::;:-.',..•-.-.',•. l,:. 3,..: Ef±..•'.,,. i.,:, 4-.-: 1',,.' c.,,.: f.,:,''.-'',..: q‘!•':'$: 4".',',."., it,:,:..',,-„.:., I',':-,,-:,..-',,:• k,,.;., s. 1-. 1' i..,',':: Y:.":.,:',.- c.'..•,,.'::,'.,' 7i..;,.::,,:.„.-! c.,: W,.,.:'',-,..,,:., 1i::'.'.,:..„.':;..,-„,,.,,-,','. 4•:,,,,:.•,:,::,, T:„•. i- 11';:.-..:,,:,-',.. J'-,,,‘.:,• i.,.,•,:• t,-.:,-,-'...,.-,..,:--,-..",..,:-',,,,,---;,'' 4.-•.,.,-:;!', t.. L.:•,,.•,,,:.,:.•-:-..--':;-,',.'..:-,-.,:•..; i': i...::-...., Y.•---.',,:- t,,.'.,-: J'::.: i-/,,,,„,•„ k.,,%:,,:!:.:-.,::'',',:,.-.,_;..-,.:,'.,:•'':,,''.,..,:,,,-,,,.,::...'.,-,•• 1.,,;... ef-'?',.:.', 1.:;.'', 1' qr:",,;",,.:..,.,'.':.:,',.,,:•.,,,.'.•..,',/,,,,'' 7.'-. 4•:; r4,,;:.•„.',.,• q, j;'- 1-.;.'-.:,•".',., r,, k. c:.,-•-,'._...-' t.' 7:. i1•-:':-'..*,,:- 1/,„:,-.,. i,:',•., r:.. r.',.:,'.,,',,,;.. r- r,.,.• - ,„ . s_ ts• Q ° THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o W CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 co-L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 0D SEPTQ April 23, 1979 Mr. Francis J. Briere 1800 Duvall Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. R-306-79; Francis J. Briere Request for Rezone Dear Mr. Briere: This is to notify you that the above referenced request was approved at the meeting of the Renton City Council of April 16, 1979 by adoption of Ordinance No. 3309. Sincerely, Rick,/Beeler 2-JZFj272Ps Hearing Examiner j--Q cc: Planning Department c;; City Clerk c ce J Cad 7:17• v yr_ 2-3UG 7 wASHINGITL©N°" "`' - ORDINANCE NO.3309 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZON- ING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPER-Affidavit of Publication TIES WITHIN THE CITY OM GENERAL CLASSIFI- CATION DISTRICT (G- . STATE OF WASHINGTON ss 1) TO SINGLE FAMILY COUNTY OF KING RESIDENCE DISTRICT f SR-1) R-306-79. WHEREAS under Chap- ter 7,Title IV(Building 1 Regu- TI . e0o, ax... ",un f being first duly sworn on lations) .of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the"Code of General Ordinances of the oath,deposes and says that...s:i;a is the Chlot .enerk of City of Renton",-as amend- ed, and the maps and re- THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) ports adopted in conjunction times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and therewith, the propertyhasbeenformorethansixmonthspriortothedateofpublicationreferredhereinbelowdescribedhas to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news= heretofore been zoned as paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, General Classification Dis-and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained trict(G);andattheaforesaidplaceofpublicationofsaidnewspaper.That the RentonWHEREAS a properRecord-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the P P peti- Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, tion .for change of zone classification of said proper- ty has been filed with the Washington.That the annexed is a { i4.tr. 3.3 0..9 Planning Department on or about February 9, 1979, which petition was duly re- ferred to the Hearing Ex- aminer for investigation, study and public hearing, as it was published in regular issues(and and a public hearing,havingnotinsupplementformofsaidnewspaper) once each issue for a period been held thereon on or 1 about March 6, 1979, and said matter having been duly of considered by the Hearingconsecutiveissues,commencing on the Examiner and said zoning request being in conformity r 0...day of i jj, 19...7.9..,and ending the with the City's Comprehen- sive Plan,as amended,and I the City Council having duly considered all matters relay- day of 19 ,both dates ant thereto, and all parties inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- having been heard appear- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE charged for I the foregoing publication is the sum of $..t•, i. egry;vhich THE CITY COUNCIL OFhasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundreawordsforthe first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent THE CITY OF RENTON, insertion. n WASHINGTON, DO OR- DAIN_ D E AS FOLLOWS: 7 I SECTION 1: The follow-. ing described property mQhe City of Renton isf hereby L rezoned to Single-Family Chilvg-elo.rhj Residence District(SR-i)as i hereinbelow specified;sub- Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2,..0 day of i ject to the findings, conclu- sions and decision dated March 8,1979,as amended xpril.'19. .. by letter dated March 12, 1979;the Planning Director is hereby authorized and I directed to change the maps I Notary Pub 'c in and for the State of Washin ,of the Zoning Ordinance,as 1 residing at Kent, King ty.I amended, to evidence said u rezoning,to wit: . Tract 2 Joseph P.Mar- shall Tracts recorded in Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June Volume 38 Page 30 of 9th, 1955. Plats records of King Co. Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and'figures, Wash., less the North .I adopted by the newspapers of the State. 147.84 feet of the West 120 feet as measured along the North line of said tract.` ' Said property being located in vvicinitydfl.800. __ Duvall Avenue NE. 1 V.P.C.Form No..87 I Fran Briere.property t' 1 SFCTIfN II:-This Ord-IL.).