Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-3364.4644°411 pi,A ----LP 114.00dkrintrifte i• : 7 t ' ' ti 4 ' .,,,,' -..'It. 4F', 7 is e4 9 2 a ft, .... ,„__ft,,,1. . 1. If.- ni : ). . N SCALEij61,4t7. 39 I'aT._ra rl G g 4. . 5/ 73.o'Z w;rL4j,j+ otop P_d. 7. 4' n' 1,+ l „so ..4 •.;07.2-11 c.. ti:V•<ve-,4-5:7 fI,S- . , •B' p;.4tj r 0/44. .,54 s." 4*EZ.... ia.!¢ w-ra a. Sot r 4.-. a r:.4t--+20-9 fie --- N.B1 - 8 rN 1 f I 7/,mac S_.. • cL 5 1Z/ `, / I 1' 9 0•• , A i 7 ••g.. X. 147 / . w. .4- xo 'p• 1 Ite '. s • R r I // ' Qrle4. 19 /9 ; N: o t Q 2 • 0 0 doiC915?;-1-9 ti N o No illg. 1.1v d-f ` t Alp 4 00 00 y654. . I, Li W I' 1 1 r! V.i 1 r CJ' o7e39 t G. 44• os le 5 Z s- sr*A-... '.4- 4 c i' r 9a t: b Arlo / A , g9 f''31'`6•B 9P2c1 4 r ,../• 0r I 4‘ • 1 1 73 III . ' Z• '6. .. .,. 4 ,li...c.,, --'''''i 1 91 s p4 ibir 17 Ab. Ivt 0/3 0 W i :,02 5 A o a' 9 y dd r crs • yG0 2 F k4 iltil• oo' b N8i•i9'S/6- t !$i!t b s Z 7b t703o M: i r ,, - 4K s Ct i _ 3 r fl o•j N d "o^, 4- . -4.*I . 40 r/ t 4 02 6S I4:4' '4';' /4 -1 . . , i my v fn. i ram., il 7"_:(7 / Y f 1_, Ju t *f s p:4 > 4S W Ck): 9si....,.f / 1 .t) 51 I - t'? A -0/5 0 2, moo, uq lri:rtg 'r, 72 ti184 9d:r a6 , ]•joe-' - r C r.A, hi 1 cR•/ 10 l l r 9 ` Y 1 p 1, /' , , j7' .'1°` kX f N8¢-II-4oEa! 1©. oo. s J c• II fb, k` 2. - 33 7 I $ 7 y =. 5. , V h riG til t 1 Ne.ao . 7 tih tli e a J05 . 11.4 ti oq + oo y Q ti oho V N . o a 116:::;0017 oito it. :1,.11.. t'' if:.,....„.'. :4‘). 1. 1, ir: . , 0:4 s. 4•a ` c 1q Z• b i VP a q r CC"' tc T`` J e 9. gt A. fin' t. ' S- G P j 1cosAjibJ 67 E N 1 0 0 I. 2y 'p Aggz _• , 6 is ;2 sz-o9 a 3 :41 2. R- as- O 1.\ ,:,/,,O32ead7 4 lC1 O, r 9g, 1 3 21 . o 3 1''c \_Y t z i N+ F 3 f!. ‘ 4. i. 4.. i. 1,\:_1 Nr.-... '.-v- i-/-•._ . '-;_ Qt_ I•* :', c-i S SE.. 7I D ti I' • 1- 'N' i. r: i '(.' li 1 r11) 31 bl:) 7ii: ' ' ..Z` -....--- tJo A ( fi , n r- 4 NS67. /Q9F S o/.p or't { 1 y 1 gJ9-44 1 W 80 Y. .V Y d q 5 0a+; ::: , • • ,,,,:e. ', w Jr 9 r I I N -dY-4Sw O/Sy3 B_?.?A'y -s 95A54 t GC Ql'y N • tl125 • 4. O 4 oz r Doll),' • v 9-6:i4 r- + f 9 ^ice, t aP.e9 1:7 of 1 7% w 1't/ 6454 ' ' CO.' 4 ZrJ 70 Jn l N '. 8 9 4 ;, R!\ /F CO 03 T y '0l2 6 1,,.J p« *: kjj ae‘: i i' C4, k.i jj 0, o Z .. It .S e.,-oqE pJg5 4 OG YO t 4,"sc'J `O 11 ilo3 h f tii o, •c , /s 5. 3 . .- N 7 ` 1 M1 S1.0 it.,AC° , Ur(A i.Z.. Mit flAUSILIZIrT3- • .0P'.N W . 91 . - 1 e, egor3 cra C. ....D . , 3 . , . . r ti cYO.I 3r Par_ LE 1 -1vICeras S ,h QD L.G. v P.ar r t S /. 1 S/o.0a 8O w- — 7Z.1 1 A r r%V Ht?- .59 k2 rZ. r 17.(• .,i/ tit -'' L « eek v s', ••S•1• t I 1 •,t r 9 o .sIe0`14? V. Q , v 11 y 0 t tiqir 1(i` 12 • 0 1h r 1 t 2. ' 1 1 c-lz if' ' 0 k-' e .°:; iiii . 4- f yC i•+ `.-1 '°T ° 'S G 9 wZ ry jr .1 VP . 111." 4 6 / 1 \\ r 1, 0 \ vsS Et/1_ 0 00/6 „,t 6S— z7 II. : j,.„. ...:. 4-11,z7 o , ikt i t 6 ' d t l 1 o0 ii1 1 O 0 3 S r iiyAwb.* Jzllr I 4 7 tr de° .4=2-.44 1 A :' *..- - - , Nr O.*:a 6111k44**N4 4, g,...,• ':', 1 • - ii.; ,., ..% , 1 • / r LN- Itt, r Q' t s. ti di, '0045 N.. .• 4, Si"4 'o2e..) I or ik 0 L, \ r., it. ( li"/''' te• MI e 6 4 lir: ' ti l klil 3/• 4 Nit ek 0••• CO 4`- pi' N., ,r A. - irc, 1.':- : 1. 624 ' 4. I.1 - 1 v h h i{intQ P t lt1C) s to 41 i i{ 7 t L. i/b Y o N I iV t,{ si / , 4 N. 4 i N t I'. X o 1 Si/f 1i S 1H c 0 I 1 Si---it,', 7.'" h\<4, 1 1.-1 .,'.olle _ ;‘,:' . v f,\ ef 'A.9$ G S rht r "i 1 + f I „e C. ,, RECEIVED ic. ay,'rt c 1, 1 CITY Of RENT011 i fr.. y - _...._. HEARING EXAMINER 1 X ittil.1131t 1 "' l . NO` G rNf•t. er J ' Q.. 1\ •t.1.MAY 2 21979 At t AM PM' Q '. i V9.4 f j -, i • i' g .3'• 71819 4;1j11211121314 516 Y z i i`T it ) 5S qq 7t' . ______._._. 6 °7 64 I , -- 7- 70 4 r, , aim ._ ! Cd 97-e. ea..3 n , 0 i I i t Or 44 I i 1 (ji 1-6- 0 °' ?e!ia • I r 4 tt 4 2 1-,., . f.... ../o.y I Nt)e--50-4.8".v 4jr 1 t J T 1 . A:.5 1 1 . 1, 41,. 1 t.l•. 1 ~4' OF I A rt THE CITY OF RENTON b '` x Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 0 y, 4fr, CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT m• 235- 2550 May 9 , 1979 Frederick R. Brown 1126 Kirkland Avneue NE Renton , Washington 98055 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO R-3 , File R-336-79 AND APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL BLDG . IN R-3 ZONE , FIle No : SP-337-79 ; property located on corner of N . E. 11 th S.t .. and' Kirkland Ave . N . E . , east of Sunset Blvd . and west of Lynnwood Ave . N . E . Dear Dr . Brown ; The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on April 16 , 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for May 22 , 1979 at 9 : 00 am- Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours, Gordon Y . ,icksen Planning irector i By : avi emens , ssocia e Planner cc : Gerald Edlund Assoc, Suite 409 , 15 Grady Way , Renton , WA 98055 Rowe/Harris and Associates , Architects Wenatchee , WA 98801 MEMO RANDUM Files DATE May 16, 1979 TO FROM Sue Hudson SUBJECT Hearing Examiner Report, Mailing List, Dr. Fred Brown R-336-79, SP-337-79 Per request of Dave Clemens, copies of the Hearing Examiner report and the agenda were mailed to the following residents on Lynnwood Avenue NE in addition to the regular recepients: Resident 1081 Lynnwood Ave NE Renton Resident 1075 Lynnwood Ave NE Renton Resident 1069 Lynnwood Ave NE Renton Resident 1065 Lynnwood Ave NE Renton PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. FREDERICK BROWN , R-336-79 , SP. 337-79 MAY 22, 1979 PAGE TWO 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: No water was evidenced on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped. E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding area includes a variety of light commercial , single and multiple family residences , and professional office uses . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A 10" water main runs north-south along Kirkland Avenue NE adjacent to the subject site and 8" sanitary sewers are located along Kirkland and NE llth Place . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per City ordinance . 3. Transit: Metro Transit Routes #107 and #142 operate along Kirkland Avenue NE adjacent to the subject site . 4. Schools : Schools are uneffected by this dental clinic. 5. Recreation : Recreation uses are uneffected by this dental clinic. G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-706 , R-1 ; Residence Single Family. 2 . Section 4-709A, R-3; Residence Multiple Family. 3. Section 4-711 , B-1 ; Business District. H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report, 1965 , Objectives . 2 . Policy Statement , 1965 , The Neighborhood and Community Plan. I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the site will not have a direct impact . However , future development of the site will disturb existing soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . These impacts can be mitigated through proper developmentcontrols and procedures , however . 2 . Population/Employment: • Additional employment will be approximately 20 assuming 6 employees per 1000 square feet of usable office area 3270 square feet) . 3 . Schools : Not Applicable . 4. Social : Not Applicable . 5 . Traffic : Additional traffic is expected to be approximately 245 traffic trips per day bsed upon 75 trips per 1000 square feet of office area . No traffic counts are available for Kirkland Avenue NE but this traffic level appears to be well within the street capacity . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared , PLANNING DEPARTMENT5 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 22 , 1979 APPLICANT: DR . FREDERICK ;R. BROWN FILE NUMBER: R-336-79 and SP-337-79 A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST ; The applicant seeks. a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3 and concurrently requests approval of a Special Permit to allow construction of a professional building (dental clinic ) on the site . Site development map attached) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : DR . FREDERICK BROWN 2 . Applicant:DR. FREDERICK BROWN 3. Location : SE corner of NE llth Place Vicinity Map Attached) and Kirkland Avenue NE 4 . Legal Description ; A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property.: 24 ,000 square feet 6 . Access : Via Kirkland Avenue NE 7 . Existing Zoning ; R-2 , Residence Two Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R-1 , Residence Single Family , minimum lot size 7200 square feet ; R-3 , Residence Multiple Family , minimum lot size 5000 square feet; B-1 , Business Use . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on May 11 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on May 11 , 1979 . C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site is part of the original plat ' of ,the City of Renton . It was rezoned from R-1 to R-2 by Ordinance #1922Tdated November 29 , 1961 . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography : The subject site has a moderate east to west slope , and a more sharp slope from south to north . The total difference in elevation across the site is approximately 8 to 10 feet , or an average slope of 6% to 8%. 2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material (AmC ) . Runoff is medium, erosion hazard is moderate to severe . This soil is used for urban development. 3. Vegetation : The site is primarily ; scrub. grass with a few, deciduous trees located along Kirkland Avenue . LANNING DEPARTMENT RELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER r17 UBLIC HEARING : DR. FREDERICK' R•, BROWN', R-336,79 , SP_337,79 JAY 22, 1979 AGE FOUR 9. The Fire Department advises that fire hydrants and access must be available prior to building construction , and the buil-ding construction is required to conform to the Uniform Fire Code . 3LANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : (SPECIAL PERMIT ) 1 . The applicant proposes to construct a one and one-half story dental clinic on the property described in the foregoing rezone application. 2. The subject building will consist of 3270 square feet , of office area and 1524 square feetof storage in a lower level daylight basement . The total parking requirement for this use is 16 spaces for office areas and one space for the storage space . Proposed are 27 spaces for general public use and a separate lot area of 7 spaces for . staff use only . Design of this staff area is substandard , but as auxiliary space alternate design is acceptable . 3. The structure has a wood exterior treatment with a flat roof design and decorative wood facia on the roof and entry overhangs . Due to the flat roof design, rooftop equipment ;('if .any)'. should be architecturally screened to compliment the building . 4. The applicant'.s:, submitted plans for landscaping are very schematic, but do provide direction for consideration of future more detailed plans . The public portion '.of the parking area should be screened from the adjoining residences by a combination of fencing , evergreen hedge and evergreen- trees (4,2204-8-B ) . 5 . Per the recommendation on the rezone to reduce the area of the staff parking (property being rezoned from R--1 to R-3) , the final design will require modification , and screening should consist of evergreen trees 8-10' in hiehgt on 10' centers on the north , east and south property. lines . 6. The Traffic Engineering comments on parking are apparently confusion over the proposed parking plan . Per #1 above , more than adequate parking is proposed . Additional comments of other departments are attached for, consideration . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : (REZONE ) Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of the rezone from R-2 to R-3 only , and 1 . The R-2 to R-3 Zoned area shall be screened by a minimum 10' deep landscaped strip consisting of a tight-, sight obscuring , evergreen screen , DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: (SPECIAL PERMIT) Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of; the special permit for construction of a dental clinic in an R-3 zone subject to : 1 . Revision of the staff parking area to conform to the, area and screening recommendations of the rezone ; 2 . Final Planning Department review and approval of a detailed landscaping plan including sight screens per Analysis #4 of the Special Permit; 3. Final Public Works Department approval of plans for public improve- ments per appropriate codes and ordinances ; 4. Provision of : fire protection per Rezone analysis #9 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE. HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. FREDERICK R. BROWN , R-.336-79 , SPc337R79 MAY 22 , 1979. PAGE THREE' K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED ; 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division , 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . City of Renton Utili'ti'es Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department, L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ; (REZONE ) 1 . The applicant, proposes to rezone 2 parcels totaling 24000 square feet at the intersection of Kirkland Avenue NE and NE llth Place from R-2 to R-3 to allow construction of a dental clinic. Also proposed is the rezone to R-3 of 4000 square feet of an 11 ,000 square foot R-1 zoned and developed single family parcel adjacent to the rear of the primary rezone area . 2 . The subject request for rezone to R-3 is generally consistent with the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies a medium density multiple family transition between, the business zoning to -the northwest and the single family use to the south- east. 3. The proposed rezoning of '4000 square feet of the R-1 parcel to the rear will have less lot area than would be allowed under the current R-1 (7200 square feet) minimum lot size . Due to the clear difference' in the proposed dental clinic and the existing single family use of the property , a future subdivision or lot line adjustment may be sought to divide the R-3 and R-1 zoned properties . In this instance , the remaining R-1 zoned area would become non-conforming due to the lack of required minimum lot area . The area of the propose R-1 to R-3 rezone should be reduced', or eliminated entirely . 4. Although the area may be in transition from single family to multiple family , this transition has been historically quite slow. The single family uses facing Lynnwood Avenue NE are an enclave of well maintained homes that have been surrounded by multiple family , professional , and church uses . . Certain measures to protect these single family residence uses should be provided as conditions of any rezone and site ,development. Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report, 1965 , Page 17 , Objective 4 , states "property values should be protect- ed within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners , through effective control of land use and enforcement and application of building and construction codes . " Objective 6 also encourages "the development and utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the comm,4nity and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work , shop , live and play . " The stability of this area for rezoning to R-3 from the current R-1 appears to be a totally unwarranted intrusion of 'an intense use into a single family area . 5 . Due to the topography of the single family parcel , which slopes rather sharply from east to west, visual protection as well as land use transition isf.c,rucial . The proposed clinic use intends to place parking in immediate proximate to the single family lot. Although landscapedscreening is proposed , consideration should be given to heavy sight obscuring screening of the parking . area . 6. The applicant's letter of May 1 , 1979 ' (copy attached ) addresses the findings required by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to 4-3014 . 7 . The Engineering and Building Divisions indicate no objections to the proposed rezone . 8:} Utilities Engineering notes that the water main on NE llth Street is substandard , that water and sewer fees will 'apply , and that water and sewer plans must be approved and installed . v/0, 4:::".....si: 1,n 0.'r••'• 1 NI V I/ ih.-/) •••• • 0 1 11 I ---.- I i SC: 1s_ - I • )100 L.G.. i i c.c.,f!d•T r•btr-dg05•_. ,• :-‘•"•41 • 7.• ..-- ---,-1... ••, !:....... n):' '''' It 1!y?7,,• ,1, . • / leV r•P7/ •7 z3 .•• • 0 , 6464 ".e...,-. ,•.7 - " • i7, Tii i . ...,..,e., u r411.11.3T , I .I. : ; '1 ,1 .1''''•.* V•.N. P ti---t -,/44..A1,,,.. ,,,- vi•;1 4 iki. .-. s, syv, 11' •I 1-44. .q r. 1 x. I I w 0 6.4' ', 0 f?/ I ..' '• ! 1 1 ;I q' I' N I . I 4•• cc 0 0 , ' . / t,, c s. ..„,, ,..,,, f 0 • ° c 0 ' , e‘ . I I 2)3 "j, • 0.. ' 0'.1 ,t •L,'• 3' Nr;r J- r,v. , „.. II* ir , 4 6.i4 , t...„,,,,,i6 .11„...• ?lb an i t4:r.: t • " MAL A.., . .--., -,'1. iA ,, :LI I e. r \./ 4OP:ft, i• 1 •-•"=" 3'.' 4 4.,. • 4.....) t- 11,I 4 ;S."7.?! .."4' iill$.1../. 9:-•-• Oig•,4,r •••• • lithi, l' 14. 4-'...'-'• NO j Ni..,, =;,-;.".•'. '' 1vi, •, ;)•• 4: Viy-,,,,,q,. - • ,,.:'.f, ,,t 1 • • 1 k'','• cilz.-...: •") .3•/ 3.3'; 1 • ,.., c. isok• 3.3/ • ' .V'' t;to •Plio:44 . L: . 1 ,,, 3) ,,, , .A.,,,,` ,3^„... '.4.:!,. -3,,•,•,;•,'.. -;, - 44111kt, 3.3-'•- 1''' . 3 al.li 7"..4'' I 6 ! '.`gt41 7.9 1.1 ,, s k n• - k) c"'-1.'.:-.... ._ ' : •, 4,7.1%669 •''.' woo'A ‘1 , ,...... i,h. , ",... ---,•. ' A.,,,' rip ..'S• /Ni r ,,,,,-,9rs-,-, .t.t., ' •..'.. •w, 4.,-v.,•,-,..e. .:- - • - ,„.„;, :;•, '':•4` 1. 41a;;,-' 42:.•,_ o, ,,,. t, ji 0 ' 1 l'' 7, tr.j• ',Al - ',d1 4' n • P, 1 :::, . ' 4° Is. wo ,'".. \‘y 7., ; ,i'',•. 4,0, N.r 42.•I , ,• irk a• . ci\./ • i- '.', 1.4 ,nol5337.8 z,, ,, , •a• 1; 1,. " N ".•. .. '' IP;•' 4 ••••••.4•5 p....,! lik, A ' .••I"1 -Qs-. — -41 4,1. c-— - ."'"i: at:' rt. Ct.. . • 4 i- p;',4 • it.."''''':''N Co 4,"1•••y,p o Al'/C.) •,.. , 0.,_<.• .. kJ ;;;;,'4, ' ii-. ...;"%'!,;(-.„,,,--•;','241,7 2.7.4‘ 33.1-' n'i•—:,.7 iis v o .. 1 . Sb. N1i,•..t. , 1" k ""- ',••114, a I t,l ,'1747' r) 4•?,) ' lv.,:4 !14: • - ... i. : r,..3 ,..-, 1, ,i v,, •.",,,--- Fi,... ,., -.4ii,,,, 9 33'''' N..33. 'g.• ; 3.3 ..,,, 3• • , ^-33300•47. AB . ..,„.„,.......--91-"4..., / 4 , t.„,14i. ,,": A ,3., , r • 1 11. ,• At, •r. . 4.,46 1117.114111 . . ' • .*. i4.) I i.W.' , I 1:;•,:r 3:1.. ^ 0- 3:.••• ' 4•% rs ••••••4 Jlimcillkill•4, Wel,"c 11 a•''''1.... it' Vt._ ...411t,..- i JO i ti, : i:4110, / t i 1 in S..,.• -14‘ : , e i‘l..-•'' ',,v 44. c, Pi 1 ro4.A:.5z?'t • .• . 411,-....,,,,://._..._.''' vs. x'" . i •I't 1 tl',.'''',C.:•'•;- =;V. .. < , -4, i.th.t... , 1 :,:!V •\ k _f3; ." ft. s: •• ' 4..1 \•• • 1 If • , I 1.'41 • 4•'''`..‘. -Pi '•••'2:1 4 .• ..k:1)• V--N. . .b.,/, ,„" 3 2. II- -••- . 4.' .. v n • — r, s 1",:i. 6--; ,, - : --..,,, .-.`;,,•,1-i -- ".2...' ::•,.. '. 4 ,'t4' ...C!..1i ' 0) ,." ''' c '••••:' •••' 1'...°7s . p ' -''-' 1.:1r.;,"‘-.". t`i.I ' •u)7 e1 Ifr,-,. ,1,41.- . ,."-,..1:ri74 -'...!' • • . • ..1 , o .-44., : ' r4 - ; /.. .' •.' 1 -; 4 I ' '''," ,' 1 1 1,- e,..,_•• i, •, 1, .i' tf, : N. V4'''' O'" I.., Iir 4 ... „..4, 1' likaaisii ,I In..• c. t 4,;x :. • * c 1..'3•7 Y; .., 7^ 3'` 73-F:i•.- - t•II:I / 7 e.f.I I i 4^,,.•,• I, . s^ 3...^? l.. I. 3,39 'i ,,,,,,- I .3As s • ";•'.. ,-k,'• ....••.. .3., 3 r •I•I 'P WI i37.:3••• 3 • • '' •I' 1 7 i1:. • 0•..."1 s '47' 5 1• )3 I.J 1s4......„s...,:i. _ ,...3..' 1., ..1 1,C': • A'' ' .t 1•:''' V ".4..' " t •'.'. r. -- si i• • ‹. 'r ., i.-I ...e I• '.n. I 0/fr. .,,,.. . J.', ; 1'r i i •••-7.i ' re .':I• 1 ,': 17 t• . 14'•';'i : '•i1 '',,.', , , K- 1,Z,e,•;‘,1-,. , , ,• 1 °€' r)7) • a 1 1 1 . 4.• • 4,, .:i• ti . . .....1.----r--t-1-737 731 --IA, IVS V I: ' 6 I I 1- i'le .4 • !.• I 1 11 I . . ' I f•:. • . '..-' y. ; c$A. '. e ,—I . • ':' • W 1-'• i . : V'.4 r v. -(0!) i/ :• •: k .;'..:. I Lt .. .i f•• ‘ 0 t' • , I,i ..4.,.1- ..? 4. tc--..•'•',i5t' `,. '+: :-'•'•.-.3';" r s'• '''• 1 14-,:,' qt'., 1,•,,'" i.-•f-.. 3:__• LL e•,, r, 1,7,-3.1.:4it.i'Ij,• 1: . j s' ,) .• 4 !••3':, "• r"•Ar : 1•.;"",;11.I . 2 rs1)•') w ' ,3 • s ,,;: r. A y t r 1 •., 7 • ."r lc el J I 141.:'t•.. tc • . , i 4. 11 ''.' ,1) L.. L., ' •. . ..14:-.l' I, ,-1,• 1 t" t ''' .,.„. ., ...., ...... f 1 ..flI Ito s....','•, ‘ 1 e ! 0 , I V 1 s 1 til1:r..-: 1. ... 1I.. . 4• c'..-'1•I' ,.1 • 9•_".. 7. 1..,..•• • • i. II) 11. c.- -1,•-•' ' r: I••Li.L .I•1 . ',.• : is 1 ' : . T 1•• I IV - ' 1 ..1lf. _.1.; kr) • 1.1 1i1 'k • ie. "I 4•••.,,•z•P I Z.; h ram. r- a it`t a i r- t. Y. e Fh 7 S' • IIIWit'< .`•1 2r4 209 .t 7 I.. . Jy e' , r.. z• ^./ I, Sr i r ccK j-. r-.. 4:".. ..-- .... al r ,.i. VAR-=. I .• . c.ig.4"--') . r... '. :-.-6'', -11-o.-, G S.,61---- 1 0 i1, a 21• t f"'' EF itr1•Jr Imo• 1 le• 1 B r/j ' j[ t-'Ar5, .a•e .• a..-` • 1 y { 1 r . in.' i 1. 1 of Irl i. 1 • R_I : 1 o I.I 1 ,, " ,, ..`'' ` '' 1 1 1>( 1.-; tt N nJ r__ ,p, I(/ 7 _ ` _r r-,_.., ,,T •., .. 1` , • "l Ay 1. 8• t '1 . 1 tea. 1 iiir 1 ; t ® C r 9.i t gfW •(•/( rt /(, I E , 14. 1 - 5 ••. A•' i L 1 ii __.,3 . a ; J " /A-.,,51.[__'1qy• n/• -, : i. {,•- ', n.vti,_, J ` 2 ; i "<^fi=,of'i ' O ` JC M1= 11 `c.. •1 t i•{'111> Z` - J ', W`_ t +'' r / ,, l• .i-1 J If bp• r. /• 'nJ • t'•' I. I" y•S,- dr I t _ r d . • .1,9' 1 A ..y:-*, pj•a 1• r •t'ti'- o, -) -, f^-'r \ 61 T _ Sf(moil • • I.' ' K' couJg 1 4, M 1• . N• •IO; p • L W!i•...L'-- A tJ't T- • ?. J•' t .+ 1 t \' 1• /•7 tJ.2 4 17 •4. +- 1 •rv;(• . T.'` 1j I l, , " e i•s lt'11 c. ..,:. . .;::--,my ;./ ••2 ": .: , r • 13 E••- ''.•44 •' k-;:-.....," .• '•-----4-•'P is ,:'k....LI 1{4! t:A. .i Itc--- r - 's'4- 11 Ji 1 jnl. •I•I1 } T_M t` ' 1 1 tr. .' M. .' r,•••., •• I JJ•''''' .'. .. I.. O2. 1 T i < " 55 i , 2 I J••i•. •'1'1'1.!. L'.1,•,_i_'1J'.` , 1''':;;:;' . 1- 1-' 1 ',',. 1I . • t c:•1.I I} — ;,, FS ' 10., ••-;:.• 1• I -` .:. 4.:. 11=4 —.--fir.-, . .' i. , •of 1 1 i I t IF •l L• . „I r L it - ''i. 't of M .•15 W• 1 4 1,,c2..ts_.1,,. q4-,.-{ 7,-, •,-,,,,-, t- - ..• -ft,t,trdt i o< 11•,I• I /• „ •••: ., 1 • 1 •;• -1 1 _--•, A• r Jt :c+ _, o...•- • tt•_51,2_,F: ,'.!' :i;;:i f1 rF'.': y- ttj 1f i .._,,,7 .:,.. 3* fl • 4• i L j- }'L-'.;_1-:__;..__•1 v F_`F I : ••1••II• 11 . • ' N E. 7'+ $'11• ii 1< E -,,,,,,,,T. 4~'' 'n a J! yr • 1 : I • + ' • },a °'•t' Z I zr t,( r. T1 L..-.` i ',+14, ,, ---4 1••. •• tq- I •• 1 ', I e • ' _ . . c < , ,.k C.. 4 - J., • l+., w t.., ie ' •1T r• S J•A I I _' ,.....,.._..._..r.. ,.,.-. +-,.. w. -• f ' O 1'• . Yi. ti I f1. ..;r T 1 1.-\ ,\)' & ` • 4, tµ10 2—r 1--t '••a n,°. •; n- i!.: <.\., '• n. y .. l • I i' 1•I f`'.}} r '•;.` •.: `N 1, 1 - t .1;•. • `:},I f7• ,•• -t• a 7.1. • •• I. •'. .' '•1 . ± ,'`'. - 1• +.'i . . 1 NC. TMi•.Ti . • HEbn. < I •0:.1_ U p.` 4. w y J- p,t, 1I1 I 1• o . 7• t LLi.. . .j..11.. 11..'.. L+ •'•I Lt iii• l t . ,;!--4--- . 1 ILi t • I baj. it •-•A •1,'. . - ) i e' 2---'=-- 7DR. FREDERICK R . BROWN R-336.-79 , SP-337-79 i r APPLICANT DR1 FREDERICK R BROWN TOTAL AREA ±294000 sq ft PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Kirkland Avenue NE EXISTING ZONING R-2 , Residence Two Family EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE Dental Clinic/Professional Bldg . 1 Medium Density Multiple Family COMPREr ENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMMENTS ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department CTJ Park Department O ,Police Department CPublic Works Department Q Building Div. Engineering Div. (Please vertft_lqqal descriptio 0 Traffic Engineering Div . - 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his deempep) bAWD le? DATE : 10 ;10P PLEASE REV! THIS APPLICATION FOR APPLICANT : 4NE7 Rataj LOCATION : 2.4 'al 1 APPLICATION(S) : ie,..60VPte 04? IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EXn W ' RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : 4 f REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r-1 Approved r--1 Not Approved Comments or conditions : Vo c.)6 7// 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 4 I 1j ra.ems f' r- SC A.L E 100 L..G.' i I . 7 I,. sn'.nt ,/ ..•r.,"f t• ty N NN a ISh. .P .' 2. 616'.I • 1 9 -1 a 1 4 ". I i b 1`1 h ' a it 1 ..._, P. i\.... \ 11' V \P , i 4 i 4;4", 6l I • i O ^// g„ fit r .,, , t' . e • 1.,r h I I • 11. 6 r' .I`,, S if, yam\ p•I It' ••.I.1Y`. I I<• I I ile. u(! Nil Z S I . I i ok.• ,'• Iiiills, c. , 2 'it_ / ,,, \ . t 'r ' ' . r.._ ri-Igef---- > 4 . ,;. ' ' 4 •, t' l. V5 ti tktii . t,,, ( ra. lwwr•.9'si °.Y• 44,' "• . o. .. w 3 f d lA r' II 1 ,. fl I,OF 1:—. .P A ' . ales [. . Or p. ,.,. , , 1, v. ..,_.,...1..tx ,. ,,, 9 I 1 ''' • J .;/ t O' s utl1HI L a'rtt 4 •b , LPoiii , t. I ' J 1 f I C f t 1• r) a• f-> t1 'liJr'i k y L_l?V I to I i J I 1`, -I' ijl f`\ 1 71j. a ''#. 11f I i S 1'• r ! 1` . '4W it K ''Ilr xt} a + n I I I i. c. yyam i%. r/, , /2, 1'- O ik, 2 r ( 1 +•w, t r • - 0,1 . '' G+i"t'_ S 1 1 ,;5.. \S r r jj I) ji r i_.,... , i... , Is' c. j ; 11 to Il1 „„ ..,1i, ,.. fi ' 1 i 4000) . '..Ii‘1 rJ 11....:2ii'.. ::( c.' b . Q r If v j s t,•/ lv/•ul vv f• I•:: S. . .r °e . _-tlL_•' .. ` I / I a~ i' IIfiI 7 j 4' t•- \ av 1 I a' I N-4n_-,7. . J *I, I ® , 19 o -,_ =I L• L '\ I': i '.r: 1 n`, ../` j 7. ,- •• tin '.•n { y ti I I -.f I ,/ I''' ,ant ' j n,,I< I 1T • 1-1 1 //. ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATiun TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department OPark Department 0 Police Department O Public Works Department O Building Div.' 0 Engin'eering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio C`5'rrl/ \ O Traffic Engineering Div . fir`+ CrUtilities Engineering Div . FROM: Manning Department , (signed by responsible official or his de ' g ee) WO j. . DATE . y PLEASE REVI THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : i1e LOCATION : eEP r"' /ifo APPLICATION(S) : 402regie• r O/- 79 0,7, 1 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EXA RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Now:n -1 lA Ti L I T‘ A ed eh ti(v/L 5 5'in:vr i. i,. S Zc N& J 1 / 54 l% Sy/St,. r eL +Gh.7 e 416.L L-4,1 rt— wl cS2 k Av' /+(Liidcl0 l R-c(:/L 1n`°n4 4- . 3 plc REVIEW BY OTHER CITY -DEPARTMENTS : Department : C A roved 1 Not Approved iSG.%Yr /1( s_, `"G4% j'`cv /-`` G" Comments or conditions : 4c(i,.:/`n,vs , riy/e6-// 4it r . 1,1t L.,/) /1 ' c 7 t - - w' /e. a,'L/j' ( /1., 2c/G/%c S r..l.L i) /` „/,. i; •'%','%.',2i- .Sit/,}, /_ < //L/.Si//l c•"/ c/:/.L' /C <<. /c../ alac_ C' e Signature of Director or . Author/ zed Representative Da ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: O Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department OPark Department OPolice Department Q Public Works Department O Building D,iv. QEngineering Div . '(Please verify legal descriptiot OTraffic Engineering Div. O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his de g ee) 0410 difigfil( DATE : 4401 PLEASEREVI 'THIS (APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : Oe: /a V LOCATION : 410 ler//fLl4 APPLICATION(S) : Aekeegt5 O 79 Itiefe4 i f ”77f IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EXA N R RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :0 AY 7 . . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Y1. . 1) Approved CD Not Approved • Comments or conditions : C 1,:- - - --41()'- e"''" C tte'''.0-.e•-.. 7c71 s--_, CS——--2— —? 2' Signatur--e`of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : J Approved r 1 Not Approved Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING F0.11:-REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CL__AIST FORMS TO : 0 Finance Department illFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department CD Public Works Department 8 Building Div . Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designeAto A SUBJECT : Review of ECF- Asplication No . : 0-------or Action Name : telPik r ••• i i' Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : 17 If Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : SIGNIFICANT / ' NON SIGNIFICANTCorn 4 I 14 C.41„/ /.., y'LI ./ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date t-; ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR, APPLICATION TO: 0 Finance Department Fire Department Library Department O Park Department OPolice Department Ti Public Works Department O Building Div. Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his de 'g ee) V/ 4 ' ' , DATE :79 PLEASE REVI THIS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : Pe.00 LOCATION : t !4 A APPLICA7ION(S) : _frji,z, 6° * S' 4 '0- *11 # ________ IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EXA '• }'R RETURN ANY COM MENTS TO' THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : D Partment : 7-4-:!,z2l=i=(E 2f1,/A1Z> c---Cl Approve. Fep,,Not Approved Co ents or cond='-- ons : E uc' '-, P21 ./i/ i) 1 2" . zc,_,,, j---:: -2___7_.,,,,,-7. ,..._.) 2 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FORaREVI•EW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department 8 building Div. Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . rtr' Li 4 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his designee ft' ' ' 4/11/______ SUBJECT : Review of ECF- A.plication No . : f-• , -4 ,, / - 1/T/Ar ' iie 111: ,,,,„ii,Action Name : // I Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : , •,o,, , Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : la Ni o m S,G Ni t Fr(AL nr f 7 Ze/d// / 7-.)0S__,11/2 L,--2; ._ 1---._____ 4;13/71 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : j- (--____-___ SIGNIFICANT NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : C r---/ /---"---- _ c /S 77 Signature of Director or Authorized 7epresentative Date i ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department 8 Building Div. Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div. O Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee4V Le dA544%1( SUBJECT: Review of ECF- Asplication No . : Action Name "- 1 .__6gehie a Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : . 117 O4 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : SIGNIFICANT NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signatur - of Director or Au horized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY 'DEPARTMENTS : Department : SIGNIFICANT 1 NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : O Finance Department IIIFire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . O Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee 4,. 1_:______OV SUBJECT Review of ECF- __ A. plication No 1: / . , , „4„. .... 4e ,,,, ,,/i,Action Name il, L../ ir.,,,,, . '4 m f / - 4 ' 'i 1 . 1/+ Please. review the att ached . Review .requested by (date) : , 0/ , _ Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : - - - 1_,t ,,,s= ( L A-)6_/.1 Ez=&-> '206 SIGNIFICANT X. NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : a//77 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINAL ,_,_CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE . )N-SIGNIFICANCE Application No .R-336-79 ; SP-337-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-456-79 , FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks rezome from R-2 to R-3 to allow construction of a professional building (dental clinic ) Proponent DR. FREDERICK R , BROWN Location of Proposal SEcorner of NE llth Place and Kirkland Avenue NE Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to have a not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental/ significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to s.uch an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y . ERICKSEN J MAY 16 , 1979TitlePLAN ,. G TD, ' ECT . Date j Signature .. '.!%6' _ 1. - . 11 City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 NOTICE I S pii y GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED ON CORNER OF N. E . 11TH ST. AND KIRKLAND AVE . N . E. , EAST OF SUNSET BLVD . AND WEST OF LYNNWOOD AVENUE N. E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC HEA ,4- ING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON MAY 22, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9:00 AM N.M. CONCERNING ITEM Wi REZONE FROM R-2 To R-3, FILE No: R-336-79 SPECIALPERMIT (OECO9NNSTRUCT I ON PROFESS I ONALIN ) IN IL LOG , Nc 79 SITE APPROVAL S-33/ I 1 WAIVER H SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERM11 I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOI1CL UI PUBLIC HLl1RIN(i RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL. BE HELD BY THE RENTON l AND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON MAY 22 1979 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . WILLIAM SCHWARTZENBERGER, APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-4 , File R-339-79 ; property located at 601-609 Shattuck Ave. So . between Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way and So . 7th St . 2 . ARTHUR D. GUSTAFSON , APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS , File E-347-79 ; property located on west side of Union Ave. N . E . , approximately 200 feet south of N . E . 10th St . 3. RAY I . CRAWFORD AND ROD T. CRAWFORD, APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM RENTON SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM TO ALLOW PERIMETER LAND FILL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON LAKE WASHINGTON , File V-351-79 ; property located at 5117 Ripley Lane No . 4. FREDERICK R. BROWN , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM R-2 TO R-3, File R-336-79 ; property located on corner of N . E . 11th St . and Kirkland Ave . N . E . , east of Sunset Blvd . and west of Lynnwood Ave . N . E . 5. FREDERICK R. BROWN , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT PROFESSIONAL BUILDING ( DENTAL CLINIC) IN R-3 ZONE , File SP-337-79 ; property located on corner of N . E. 11th St . and Kirkland Ave . N . E . , east of Sunset Blvd . and west of Lynnwood Ave , N . E . 6 . JOSEPHINE 0. NUNN , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G TO R-3 , File R-342-79 ; property located approximately 900 feet south of N . E . 4th St . , west of Union Ave . N . E . , between Greenwood Cemetery and existing City of Renton property . Legal descriptions of applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THIE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 22 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED May 11 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 9th day of May 19 79 SIGNED "1' 4111/ A404•44)•% r\; , e.;:,!,...:: 1(: 1- ai I d '{ a..Yln' { f 2 i--- .s C .y:.J - .- s SL,. 62:.. ,A'•ih% i.•xf, /` .NY r v 34,4:0 dsra r :ma ti( ' r j.*-,,.... i g-III Pl I..:1 r. 2 . bldg. site ;`• r,1 sib a r` tp . 1-: 47,LiG! l r.:; Pt. • / y• t/ i / v -iY" - -o+Y. c.r 3Y+{., JQ2p:1 Vf i c VFk H'' r5c: v` y d- ii2 Ct f i rrS^ s dc„ .` I v mil-7 ' Z r.s..• •• . .• w.-; ::. ,.„-•._' 4. ; :.... -:,•'...('"I'',".1.3.-i.•..k.W.44..,,, s.„..‘.., 44-- , ; 4,;.)7 .v1 0. VICINITY MAP` .$ ` 'O`ti Ya\ K r x jY3tr +; i r- a} t 6. -- . zt _}.r f ' '' 8 r1I i GD c`0A" pry1a S.. 1 r u t sgyp. 712.j 371.E o"• N: w'fI' i 2• loitimr. a k ' t. t1 t.9,;..T ^t. '. t i ,felt 110 1 r ?;.c '+, f' ,. ,1 w,.r.t 1If rl!''I.I'; 7,,III: ,: vi T PLANrs1ru t tg 4 WEST E VAT I ON 2- Y_' R r - .. N 7. Locatio.n,: of proposal, (describe 'the 'physical setting of the proposal , as well as,-the:;extent of the'Nland area affected by any environmental impacts, including and, other information- needed to give an accurate. understanding of the environ- mental setting'dof the;,proposal ) : In the `cr:.nter. of=the business core area of the Renton Highlands. On the Sc Elt prrapor y ]'no is the Highlander Apts on the rtorch property line is iamct that is Zerted R-3. A11 of Gracelmd-T©rrr.ece is.zoned R-3 except . . My 2 Cats,-:lthich are zoned ii 2. s tic building will cover 13.6 of the land. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Fat:t of 198O. 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local--including rezones) : OhAn o of R. 2 to R'3 zoning Special Permi'L' Building Permit 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , .expansion, or further activity . related to or connected with' this proposal? If yes , explain: . No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by ' • your proposal? If yes, explain: No • 12. Attach any other ,application form that has been completed regarding the pro- ' posal ; if none-has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: AU applications arc included with this proposal. • " II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE TO b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- covering of the soil?YET-- MAYBE NO c) Change in top ra or ,gro d surface relief features? Earth w.I1 be filled in on South property line to beautify an existing cement retaining wv i 3. WV • MAYBE NO d) The destruction, covering or modification of any X unique geologic or physical features?yrs-- WAYBE' KU- e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,- . . either on or off the site? YES • MAYBE NO f) Changes in deposition or erosion 'of beach sands , or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which - , may modify the channel of a river or stream or the X bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Vas MAYBE N- Explanation: CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTONr.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM JJ/ \ onurn 6 r,t, J g FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1 ' Application N o. /1..3 > /7 c J I 1 Environmental Checklist No. --._(.:j=— f,36 PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of Significance I Declaration of Significance Declaration of Non-Significance [} Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C. RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Frederick '`• Drown 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 112$ Yirkland Ave., N. .. "Menton, .`iashington 9vO55 226-1!l22 3. Date Checklist submitted A- r l 1, 1)?) 4. Agency requiring Checklist ,:ity of 1-ienton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable : iro essional DUildin,; in .ienton highlands for Dr. i'1-ed. ::. !frown, 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size , general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : A professional building, mainly P'edical and Dental, split-level of approximately 4,; 00 5q.:zt. It will have a stained cedar siding e:cterior. It will be completely landscaped with ample parking and a drive aiound the building. r//' 4- w 5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species,. or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? YES tom.. NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X VEST.. M YBE NO c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d)` Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?X 6E5- MAYBE 07 Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase .existing noise levels? • YES Mr YBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?• YES • MAYBE Yl- Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal •result _in the alteration of ,the X present or planned land use of an area?E MAYBE NU— Explanation: This is in a business area and right across the streetet from my eU nt" dental of ice, 9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate 'of use of any natural resources?' • • Y MAYBE NO b) _ Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES , -E N Explanation': 10) Risk of Upset. . Does the proposal involve a risk of. an ' explosion. or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? • UWE. Nam. Explanation: 11) . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? ,Yrg-- NIT Explanation: 11r 3- , 2) Air. ' Will the proposal result in: a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air-X quality? YTUVE fir b) The creation of objectionable odors? X It MAYBE . NU— c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any. chenge )in,cl.imate;--either locally or X regionally? r' YES MAYBE WO-- Explanation: 3) Water. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in .currents, or the course of direction of X : water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? YES MABE NO ' b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Y€T MAYBE tf6r c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? A YES MAYBE 0— d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? YES MAYBE NO e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? YES` MAYBE NO f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES MAYBE NO , g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through X interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either. through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, li or other .substances into the ground waters? . YES MAYBE Ao' . I) Reduction ,in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? YES MAYBE A6— ' . Explanation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops , . r microflora and aquatic plants)? YES CBI b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of flora? YUS. MAYBE RT— c) Introduction of new species of flora into an. area, or . . in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YET— )iA Y.B E R4— d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? M Explanation: e 6 r (d) Sewer or septic tanks? f YES MAYBE NO X e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE 0— f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17)„ Human Health. Will the.'proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding X mental health)? VES MAYBE !t Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the'proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site .open: to ,'publ i'c.view?'":. :Is:: . • ., . X . VB MAYBE • 0— Explanation: 19) 'Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?,YLS MAYBE' NO Explanation: • 20) Archeological Historical . Willthe, proposal result. in -an. . alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, •structure, object or building? X vrT7 MAYBE, NO Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency' may.withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack'of full disclosu o my part. A Proponent: 1. 4 Ts gne Frederick R. Brown name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 5- 12) Housing. Will the •proposal affect existing housing, or X create a demand for additional housing?VET- M i1 Y B NO Explanation: 13) -Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular- movement? X YES WEE, NO b) Effects on- existing parking facilities, or demand X for new parking? YES MMAYBE WO- W Impact upon existing transportation systems? .— YES ': O— d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or X movement of people and/or goods?YES - MIT' 0— X e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES iRATBE f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , X. bicyclists or pedestrians?YES ;MAYBE N Explanation: Patients will be coming to and from the building. -New parking is being provided with the building. 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result -in a -need- for new or altered governmental services in any of the,following areas : i . .. a). ; Fire. protection? X YES MAYBE 0— b) Police protection? X YES ' MA •BE Nb— X c)- Schools? YES ... MAYBE X d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES 'MAYBE . NO e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? X YES AIME. NO Explanation: 15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X YES MAYBE 0— b) -.Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE A( Explanation: 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: X a) Power or natural gas? YES )MAYBE F1(T' X b) Communications systems? ref— M BE Wb— c) Water? X YES MAYBE NO 111114 Fes„, , 1 ,., aa qq i 1 f i i w fJ J i I I I t sue' i Li) ` a'` 4{1 I y 4t r ,: F IITilj 1 • 4 pa a s" 53 v 1 FORM L58Ei Statutory Warranty. Deed THE GRANTOR. JOHN RACAldELLO and VERLEIGH B.ACANELLO, his wife for and in consideration f f TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) AND ( 'HER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, conveys and warrants to FREDERICK R. BROWN . and tiARGARET E, DROWN,' his Wife :. State,Of the following described real estate, situated in the County of King Var shington: Lot 3, block 2, Cracelana Terrace, according to plat recorded in Volume 50 of Plats , prtge 64, in King County, Washingtort Subject to all easements , restrictions and reser.vaticn, of record, t1 hereto, This deed is given in Fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between t e parties dated February, 4, 19 64 end ^:or,ditioned for he conveyance of the ehLrt'e described property,and the covenants of warranty ''nevelt) contained shall not apply to arty title,interest or encumbrance arising by, tnrouiah or under tie purcbeF.er in said contract. and shall not apply to any taxes, assessments or other charges levied,' assessed or'becoming dui.; subsequent to the.date of said contract. Dated this 4th day of FOruary, -p64 r t. t J - 1 r . r._ ' . r',.L(SW). STATE OF WASHING;TON, ss, County of King On this day -personally ;appeared before me John RacaaeI io anr.VerIcigh La.cancil i:7 to Me. known tn ti.a the ir,,iividval dc::tuibed in anti wiic £1&niea the within and furl.'„ning iti5tnumceni, arle and vJ '+";, dl'' i „td -r1e +t r.ttel .r fie v,l r,tl,: ct anti th d, acknowledged t'.t t till y , t44+""; ,. GIVEN ur.dc. rn;.U:d oait` Tyr-0.17y Pr!I5tie in on.:! for lbe ate of i,;ns 4i vihif?, AFFIDAVIT I, Frederick T . Brown being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers' herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me - this \3 day of Pk `\ 19 "r1 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Name of Notary Pu lic) Signature of Owner.-)' .- , 1-0 1126Kirkland Ave., 1T.Ed Address) Address) Renton, Washington 98055 City) State) 226 - 1422 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the oing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be/+0o 'd complete in every particular and .to conform to the rules a /4r -• kik' \of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing `su KLuc( .on. V r1 Date Received APR 16,19it 99 By: CI' 41 Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 ' CITY OF RENTON RP_7.ONE APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY LAND USE HEARING APPLICATION NO. 336- 7 9 EXAMINER 'S ACTION• APPLICATION FEE $ /(x-w. C--6 APPEAL FILED RECEIPT NO . .177 / J CITY COUNCIL ACTION FILING DATE y J ORDINANCE NO. AND DATE HEARING DATE APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : Frederick R. Brown 226-1422 1 . Name Phone Address 1126 Kirkland Ave., N.E. Renton, Washington 98055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on S.E. corner N.E. 11th. Place Kirkland Ave., N.E. between and 24,000 sq.ft.4 . Square footage or acreage of property q 5 . Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet) p/ ,free 5ey/ 4,74 27 Lots 3 &44 Block 2 Graceland Terrace as recorded in King County Plats Vol 60 Page 64 o4 R E t U 1919 APR NG 'p 6 . Existing Zoning R-2 Zoning Requested R-3 NOTE TO APPLICANT : The following factors are considered in reclassifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure Sheet for specific requirements . ) Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site Professional Building, mainly Medical and Dental 8. List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. No special measures are necessary. This is an area of medical and dental buildings. My present office is just across tithe street from this location. Land on both sides of the property is presently R-3. There is a large apartment house next to the south property line. 9 . How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the site? As soon as I can get a building permit and a contractor to build. 10 . Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 1-77 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: DR. FREDERICK BROWN , R-336-79 , SP-337-79' MAY 22 , 1979. PAGE TWO 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water: No water was evidenced on the subject site . 6 Lund Use : The subject site is presently undeveloped. E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding area includes a variety of light commercial , single and multiple family residences , and professional office uses . F . PUBLIC SERVICES := 1 . Water and Sewer: A 10" water main runs :north-south along Kirkland Avenue NE adjacent to the subject site and 8" sanitary sewers are located along Kirkland and NE llth Place 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per City ordinance . 3. Transit: Metro Tra,nsit Routes #107 and #142 operate along Kirkland• Avenue NE ` adjacent to the subject site . 4 . Schools : Schools are, uneffected byy this dental clinic.. 5 . Recreation,: Recreation uses are uneffected by this dental clinic . G. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE': 1 . Section 4-706 , R-1 Residence SinglerFamily. 2. Section 4-709A, 'R-3 ;' Residence Multiple Family. ' ' 3: Section 4-711 , B-1 ; Business District. H. ' APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Land Use, Repor.t , 1965 , Objectives . 2 . Policy Statement , 1965 , The Neighborhood and Community. Plan . I . :IMPACT ON THE.. NATURAL' OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems: ,Rezone- of " the site will not have .:a ,di'rect impact. However , -Future development of the' site will disturb existing soils , increase storm water runoff and have an effect, on traffic and noise levels in the area . These impacts can be mitigated through proper development .controls and procedures , however . 2. Population/Employment : • Additional ' empl-oyment . will be approximately 20 assuming 6 .employees per 1000 square feet of usable office area 3270• square feet) . 3 . Schools : Not Applicable . 4 . Social : -Not Applicable . 5 . Traffic : Additional traffic is expected to be approximately 245 traffic trips per day bsed upon 75 trips per 1000 square feet of office area . No traffic counts are available for Kirkland Avenue NE but this traffic level appears to be. well within the street capacity . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton' s Environmental Ordinance' and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a negative declaration of environmental impact has been prepared . RECEIVED CITYHEARINGO RENTON XAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY 2 21979 PM NM PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER 71819110111a21112131415,6 PUBLIC HEARING MAY 22 , 1979 APPLICANT : DR . FREDERICK R. BROWN EXIHIBIT NO. / FILE NUMBER: R-336-79 and SP-337-79 ITEM NO. t i A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST; The :applicant seeks a rezone of the subject site from R-2 to R-3 andlconcurrdritly requests approval of a Special Permit to allow construction of a. professional building (dental clinic ) on the site . Site development map attached ) B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 : Owner of Record : DR. FREDERICK BROWN 2 . Applicant : . DR. FREDERICK BROWN 3. Location : SE corner of NE llth Place Vicinity Map Attached) and Kirkland Avenue NE 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. S'i.z.e of Property : 24 ,000 square feet 6. Access : Via Kirkland Avenue NE 7. .' Existi,ng Zoning ; R-2 , Residence Two Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : R_1 , Residence Single Family , minimum lot size 7200 square feet R-3 , Residence Multiple Family , minimum lot size . 5000 square feet B-1 , Business Use . 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan ; Medium Density .Multiple. Family 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice...-was properly, published in the Record Chronicle onon May 11 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on May 11 , 1979 C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site is part of the original plat, of the City of Renton . It was rezoned from R-1 to R-2 by Ordinance #1922 dated November 29 , 1961 . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : 1 . Topography: The subject site has a ..moderate east to west siope , and a' more sharp slope from:,.south to north . . The total difference in elevation across'. the site is approximatelY.:8'° to 10 . feet, or an average slope of 6% to 8%. 2. Soils : Arents , Alderwood material (AmC) . Runoff is medium , erosion hazard is moderate to severe .` This soil is used for urban development. 3. Vegetation :.,, The site is primarily scrub grass with a few deciduous trees located along '"Ki'rkl'and Avenue . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINERAM PUBLIC HEARING : DR. PREDERICK 'R, BROWN ,, R-336 79 , SP.337:-79 MAY 22 , 1979 PAGE FOUR 9. The Fire Department advises that fire hydrants and acc.e s.. must be available prior to building construction , and the building construction is required to conform to the Uniform Fire Code . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : (SPECIAL 'PERMIT) 1'. The applicant proposes to construct a one and one-half story dental clinic on the property described in the foregoing rezone application . 2. The subject building will consist of 3270 square feet Of office area and 1524 square feet' of storage in, a lower level daylight basement . The total parking requirement for this use is 16 spaces for office areas and one space for the storage space . Proposed are 27 spaces for general public use and a separate lot area of 7 spaces for staff use only. Design of this staff area is substandard , but as auxiliary space alternate design is acceptable .' 3. The structure has a wood exterior treatment with a flat roof design and 'decorative wood facia on the roof and entry overhangs . Due to the flat roof design , rooftop equipment (if any) should be architecturally screened to compliment , the building . , 4. The' applicant' s submitted plans for landscaping are very schematic , but. do,, ;pr'dvide direction for consideration of future more detailed plans . The public portion' of, the parking area should be screened from the adjoining residences by a combination of, fencing , evergreen hedge and evergreen trees (4-2204-8-B) . 5, Per the recommendation on the rezone to reduce the area of the staff parking (property being; rezoned from. R-1: to ;R-3 ) ,. the final design will require modification , and screening should consist of, evergreen trees 8-10 ' in hiehgt on 10'' 'center-s on the north , east and south property lines . 6. ' The Traffic Engineering, comments. on parking are apparently ' confusion over the ',proposed parking plan : Per #1 above , more :than "adequate parking ' is proposed: Additional comments of other departments are attached fOr consideration . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: (REZONE) Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval: of the rezone from R-2 to R-3 only, and 1 . The R'-2 to R-3 zoned area shall be screened- by a minimum 10' deep landscaped strip consisting of a tight, sight obscuring , evergreen screen . DEPARTMENTAL , RECOMMENDATIONS : (SPECIAL PERMIT) Based upon the foregoing analysis , recommend approval of the special permit for construction of a dental clinic.; in an .R-3, zone subject to : 1 . Revision of the staff parking area to canform. to the area and screening recommendations of the 'rezone ; 2 . Final Planning' Departme;rt review and approval of a , detailed landscapir plan including sight sc'r..eens per Analysis #4 of the Special Permit ; 3. Final Public Works Department approval of plans for public improve- ments per appropriate codes .and, ordinances ; 4. Provision of fire protection' per Rezone analysis #9. i PLANN.INGDEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMI;NER ,, ;. PUBLIC HEARING: •. DR. F:R'E'DERFCK R. BROWN,; R-336=•79 , SP=33,7-79 MAY 22 , 1979 PAGE THREE K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENT.S CONTACTED ; 1 . City of Renton Building ;Division . 2. City of Renton Engineering Division , 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utili'ties Division , 5. City of, Renton Fire Department, , L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ; (REZONE) 1 . The applicant proposes- to rezone 2 . parcels .totaling 24000 square feet at the intersection of Kirkland Avenue NE 'and NE llth Place from .R-2 to R=3 to allow construction, of a dental clinic . Also proposed is the rezone to.,R-3, of 4000 square feet of an 11 ,000 square foot R- 1, zoned ,and developed single family, parcel adjacent to- r the.. rear of the primary rezone area . 2. The subject request for rezone to R-3 is generally consistent 0wi th';::the. land use element . of the Comprehensive Plan which identifies a- medium density multiple family transition between the business zoning , to the northwest and 'the. single family use to the south- east. . 3. The , proposed rezoning of 4000 square feet of the R-1 parcel to the rear will. 'have less lot area than would be, al lowed under, the current R-1 . (7200 square feet)- mi'nimum. lot, size. ' `Due to the ' clear difference irn the proposed dental clinic and the existing single family use of the property , a future subdivision or lot Line adjustment may be sought to divide the R-3 and R-1 .zoned ' properties.. In this instance ,:. the remaining R-1 zoned area would become non-conforming due, to the lack , of,;required minimum lot area . The area of the propose R-1 to R-3 rezone should::.be reduced ;, or eliminated ., entirely . 4. Although the area may be in transition from single family to multiple family, this transition has been 'historically quite slow. The single -family uses facing; Lynnwood Avenue NE ,are an enclave of well maintained homes that have been surrounded by multiple family , pr.ofessiohal , and church uses . , Certain measures to protect these single family residence uses should be provided is conditions of any rezone and site development. . Comprehensive Plan , Land Use. Report , 1965 , Page 17 , Objective 4 , states"property values should ,be protect- ed within the community ,for the benefit of its residents ,and property- owners , through- effective"control of land use and enforcement and application -:of .building and construction codes .''-Objective 6 also encourages "the development and utilization of l and to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best interest of the comma ni'ty and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which"to work , shop , live and play . " The ,stability of thits- .area .;for,; rezo,nin.g to ,R-3. from the, current R-1 appears to..:be a..tota];ly. unwarranted in;tr'usion of an intense use into a single- family area ! 5 . Due to the topography of the single family parcel , which slopes rather sharply from east ,;to1-west', :visual ;protection':,as. well as land, use transition is crucial The proposed 'cl'i'ni c use 'intends to place parking I n. Ammedi ater proximate to . the single ,family lot. Although landscaped . screening is proposed , consideration: should be given to heavy sight obscuring " screening of the parking area . 6 . The applicant' s letter of Ma y "1;, :,1,979 (copy attached ) addresses the findings required by the Hearing :Ex a;mi ner. pursuant to 4-3014. 7. The Engineering and Building` Divis:ions" indicate no objections to the proposed rezone . . 8. Utilities Engineering - notes that the water main on NE 11 th Street is substandard , that' water- and sewer fees will apply , and that water and sewer plans must be approved and installed . i , 1 ......'•_:--r.7-4 t .. Y1 )si . i . -- w, am/ 1 v I. I I ira7.ty no.r.- SC.F,. 1 J G' U Prr,T 616Vi T7.. .- --- -• M' ', t ./S"pr 1 I )I;r l N" / I. toe . . Iia.G B • t ' AI.6A6t, r ` r. •• v 1.1•fo Y4114 I'.r 1 •.,'T t ,.. ,.t, i I•. ...i Iv SIN.IT • V 1 11 L ' yi ... 1/•. I:/•I tr . 1/re,. S•I i! " r{ Y y,' ,kr ,Y'•_+ y".•( ;/ sti It IY liP •11 r:1. • • V v ,.! 4 ^r' •6 f-J r " , v 14 v. .,..1,.,4 . . yi ''' -* 1' 1,..•.; e.' I‘ 4, . li: •s/ •• 1t)l—, 'c• • iii 0." 4 . .' Ir• ,`NN'r9'JI/ ,/N , , I . ' M1 r", Y rld a4 7I ° Y. V or.,..., , gin i7. 'k! • I s. '' 1'1• a v i F a •.. n o/5 al`.i37Ff.x I A, ` I ) n : Q' 4 1 ` Io•11111k °`8 tee. Q- Y,,,`t• `. `/ . fix w,6, „. e4*. L7 •II at* J A r o s'' s is v a, t;,f t 1.. : c o.'.:, 7t a tk • '?„ t7.. a 9lrraSr }I r, K iss...K. A v y n s o .,fll 4\ tiS` ! }F;g c+b.J' f Joo ,iw4y,' \ s v af b4• 10 I% ISf • 1•, t`• rlf 3` I' I'\y , i dt I fi a ,. p., i ` r 1 rl.. a J O is y„ ,,a I 1IAla 4 r 1..}.e. P YR T•` - •.. ru i T i w • a. h I31 ; 1,i 1 d r ti ?rY _ -- j ;,r s , I ^ fG ;; I I • 1••f e: I YJ. I r. r fit r .b ?" 1 1 c '' •r• • tr 1,r,•, r-n .I I f ^ ., 4 I.0 I . ' y y • r / a,i,. < .I 1 YJ vI- ° I S. f. QI a 1,•r• •,i•s I`7 97- __ • 7 I IIiII` / E`. .s, r, ._ ,. 1.,•• f l.• k..£. ,,. n 'v' -I/. '.I Y!ci.f.1, 1 • . 1—I ( . z. i I 1 1 If w 1 3 J I 11 1 • t' tMe ' i s,' .... w. 11116, t. ._). aw, „ _d ~•! a `•.'. 14.,;,,,.61,1 try ••••.••••••• a ''' t' I Rao : t• ' i • : 1 f T A . 1, • —( s + I __ - ! , 1 - i 3e r, L f r , !, /y G• ` WG ` o• it I 1 .,.... p I f . j11 -r .{ t "` i .,.. ``- I- „ •. 1f. . t 0 '•f / f'r`\7` rar' N t,•„Lrt oyT 1 a_e , • 1 it--. 1T Z pPA E 1.to.. A+ •(i Y I. a t F A •j I `` •1' '• 1 ii, • .. 40 N ,9 : , , , 1. „ .l i „ i4 4 f} fl ` td t. I 1 1 I.?If lSrL • a 1._.t. to ` -1 N E fl Q p ., • ,t'• o• 1 . 1 QI• I.I• r i 1"• 1 . SI • ' `(1tI E Y J, J. )J, I t 0 'jY : ;+ ,RI , = ;." •r y•l, •• R. 5I -•r,rrt7 a •s•. 11rXJ I ,. , • L a t a 2.., J.11 a i { . 1 91 1 1 ' ti1 fir 'J ,. I J• A A.- a al.•,•ff,• •t•C,,, .. 1••I Jo f ti ll.i..14 t ff 99 1G i.I {" ,. „_ 17 ••• M ST ' F r' ,' 0 I,,' 4.I IIi1I.I .1•I.1 .. r._ N I I•ry 1•" , I( tr I 1' . .,. 1. 1, {`" ,', .. 1y. r•r .'. .. p,. ,Ir t '•I,., -rinll. I . ,'•. ••^'i; . r _,I. )j 010 I' . Y••j.- I •'1'jl ••i i L'..1.1,.:"N1.1'. 1,. a.i a,J y e p...«. _, L.C.1 •• . 1', : ;,,, ,6 * I',tr,t•r:jf_: t I '• TI Grp. t' y 42. le .4..1,`, +[,l'l•I.1•lr.,l ' •W''i1 ...•rl.' .. I---•,, ' 10F ,, .I•1,11 F 1 . ' I J I' , Iricni01f••{• '' i . • -- 4' rStre. 0 •;• ' 1 r.. 4.• L l/^ W* „,1 • 1f'; r• • f • Ji 1 1•1J ••1•y •}- 0w.• t 1' aI•4,, 51 ' M ,L, to { f•' • i - ..mot I, T• ry 7 J1• :\'. 1j --`.4, •,il ,4 ." I 1, ;1.- 1• J L•I.:• !C 1'. 1J 1..'I.t.:.,}•.1,•'•Y,,,,, .. l.. ,.t if. r AI, 11 r ,. E_ ''' 4' 1~ • r A .1 't;I.: 1. 1_1-i 7F-1_' . I +^ 1.!V f _ .RO 111 - 4.. 01 n• ? 1• N+ a{ 41111011/ vn••J4 1 I1. !' tu p J > " rh • \\. _,l:M •"••• • .' 1 I i• = w T"' 1• + . y p 2Y• r;,•N c q rlJl i•,,.• ~ t-\ is, 1 t •V•' 'r l- Yam' . F j ' I i• rw 1:{'5„I: `. • ',>I' , ia-L-,1. .4•'•.1 i.' ,n,.-. , ..,i .. 1 1' ka•i'.1' :. r , • 4 ' . . • F , ;; , . •.„.: ci 9 7 .r M° - ! ti' _ 1 11 'P iii is J m1.1-t r. J• i 18` I I,..tY I ,Jtib•44•Al•' y:i i- , •P, ,>,1• Lrj' . 'w • ;.e' '-1J2''i J • u +.y,.t ,. .I .. r1,•.;.. S..l,.•.;•I.1'1'"jel„. __...... ...,.,.......k:••;........ -- t. ro.i I." i' y r a, r .`4 •. r . I 1 { ^ ° •J 0 1 '5 ;• 1 ,"' T t . _ ., . , I SR."' I f I a T.• .•1••1.1 J_ i( R 1 LLLJAL:fb f t b j' ,_ 1iL T 1 . 4 of ,• "• y. I T^; -.. R-3t y i - Y I D . FREDERICK. R . ,.iBROWN R=336-79 , SP-337-79 - -- APPL1GANT DRE LF:REDER'ICK R .BROWN TOTAL AREA +24 ,.000. sQ ft PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Kirkland Avenue NE '. NG R-2 , Residence Two.' Family EXISTING ZONI • EXISTING USE Und'evel oiled_ Dental `C1`ini,c./Prpfessional Bldg 1. PROPOSED USE s Medium Density Multiple Fami ly 4 COMPREHENSIVE LAND 'USE PLAN I COMMENTS t 1 f Ji I ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION QFinance Department , Fire Department Library Department 0 Park Department 0, Police Department 0 Public Works Department 0 Building Div. 0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal descriptio 0 Traffic Engineering Div. N„ Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his A defigpee) DAT E #9 PLEASE REVI, THIS APPLICATION FOR APPLICANT : deati4/ LOCATION : • 11.11Itê APPLICATION(S), : ' 111‘ 4461/7 ”i'" 71 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING EX..6 # RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :0 // '"/ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : DCPATIL•iiiiu Ti L.-1 T A porteue 0 I C•1 S‘,/10CfjL,12°°•."Chl e 0 IA•t(5-1 ki 04 Li6 A Nu) )6 0 1..,t.),)-rt;Pc 5,----eid,c4-7 et,.4iLl REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r—rApproved 1Not A—p—proved /s2,ex e, AZ-- Comment or conditions : 61 '(-/LIC-7.1-7-3 • trY/e6.-//Y/M%/A...-V-• ///1--6_,) /1C cc bit L.„5 c1' / 7 /, t--Jc S 7, ` • it LA_ 1/ (/7-7" Signature of Director or Author,' zed Representative DC7e7/7 9.. r IN V 2 .3 1 "" ; b . • ..)1 r i :... ii J 17 s or•s ro.r,- SCALE I ICiO1 / It,4 \'aoi•f ...y,i' NH/0 fv I.Sh. R • !!Yr. 7. . . __ a.- - :•,.qrv- _ 1l 71.,] T,.. _ Ti k. 11 k . •1' A'' y 1 f11% '‘.6 ( 1, . 1. ' .; • ,I v 0 4 ' ' i c .:. • I.i,9.,.\."...•4 ., ..': , ; $ .4, • ' . i ' s I '-- M/:. C'41t: t Ii4c.rr' ' -- ;I ki ids•''- y,r a., • / MA r a ' y S S F 1111:::'14: n/`' W 1—:' M,11.'i t ® f J } A L4 ` L. • rv};- - F ; ).' ,1,, F WAn 'a.,; 9ri"/ ' T ^ 0"', .,i i4.. A1OS ,. a. i q 6.. . 1 Y i'L U 1 nn w • a •— - A:I.'', • 1• . Y3 YF. I, i,,,,,,,, d,' ` a cif' ; ! 'h M 4.1 5 o l 9' ,, l/'. • ry P ® v 4i'221._Yt M1 . 1 1 44 s rye IY 1 Tin I. .# pi mo I l,r Id I, y 1' .. 14.i -. ' I • .. ?.- ' 1- ''-.) I '• i.;,: bi, 1 .'„t 1 •., , • .'v'--` . I.„.,. ' f t I fG,., i1 if I,, jj ' J.:, . i,• : .'- 1 , ' .L.' ft': - . • • t' fje , ... • . • 1.. • . i . .../.° . r,i I45 s . o 1,.1 1 0 S! 1,J 1../ . , " . ' ''.4,', , • : . 1..i . ' a IDry ,un''6f S. e, r r '7 A .'I. f' I •. f'it I Ul 1 I I': cr, ,-I 4 ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: 0 Finance Department 0 Fire Department 40 Library Department 10 Park Department 40 Police Department 2) Public Works Department Building Div. Engineering Div. 0 Traffic Engineering Div . 4tY : 1 0 Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his designee r 0 SUBJECT : Review of ECF- A plication No . : Action Name : eij0. 4. Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : Note : Responses to be written in ink . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : gr, NOM. i.t(Ftc" 117: 5/3/71 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :, Department : SIGNIFICANT 1-"NON Comments : r- i-A7 Signature of Director or Authbrized( epresentative Date f ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: 0 Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department , Police Department Public Works Department J Building Div. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS Department : /..:----i, y/Heeokt--/ E3 Approved OD Not Appiroved Comments or conditions : 742 re Z co pt C.',, 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : pr,Approved ED Not Approved ' omftents or conditions : Z e,(Signatu), , of Director or Authorized Representative 2,_ --? Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: D partment : -' ,,7;., Approyed- - 0 Not Approved Co ents or cdnd.- 2 ci ,-- e2-,-A , J..., r c:),7 ?C c 21, e 7- (4)1,- ' i'-•c P‘..'e-• 7-eir t-0,1-,..,:-' L, 6,, 1; ,-,),_„ /, r, 7 ,, :,.., 7 s./2,,,,,,,,o, i i) /cy 7 2 „ 7 L._:,, „/,/,,. ,p1 ,P--,,/, .// Signature of Director. or Authorized Representative Date PROPOSED/FINA DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANT NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No .R-336-79 ; SP-337-79 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-456-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant seeks rezome from R-2 to R-3 to allow construction of a professional building (dental clinic ) Proponent DR. FREDERICK R. BROWN Location of Proposal SEcorner of NE llth Place and Kirkland Avenue NE Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT' ' This proposal has been determined to ® have not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030( 2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . non Reasons for declaration of environmental/ significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent• or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/ final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official GORDON Y . ERICKSEN Title PLAN I . G:D9-ECT! ' Date MAY 16 , 1979 r Signature ut,• A r,.+-- ., -4: City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 J • ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHE .7,Y.IST FORMS TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library . Department Park Department . ; REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 6 z z- i.e..Le'c'F'/ r _ SIGNIFICANT / ' ' NON. SIGNIFICANT Comments : z. 4 f 4Z)/;%, 4-)--— Er. — 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :122--7id; SIGNIFICANT lam! NON SIGNIFICANT Comments : Signature- of Director or A'u' horized Representative Date i REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :_____ __________ /sZ /7-7 c L;e( G l/1..' E'C=yk i av 6 SIGNIFICANT k' NO.N SIGNIFICANT Comments : Z--c"-------)._-,1_ -6-":"__,. ;5:7 ---"-- --- -e/-st-L----,...___J a://7" Signature of Director -Ur- Authorized Representative Date y R-336-79 Page Two SP-337-79 Dr. Brown referenced Section L.2 (Planning Department Analysis - Special Permit) , and clarified that the square footage of the proposed building will contain more than 3270 square feet of office space as denoted in the report due to utilization of most of the basement for current and proposed office use, and only a limited amount of space will be utilized for storage of dental equipment. Regarding the proposal for restricted one- way circulation within the parking area, Dr. Brown advised that in the clinic's current location directly across the street from the proposal, it has been observed that patrons disregard one-way signing and travel through the parking area in both directions. He advised his desire to provide as much parking space as possible to accommodate customers as well as transit users to utilize the parking lot. Dr. Brown objected to screening recommendations since the proposed building will be an attractive addition to the area, and height of the structure will be limited. Regarding existing R-1 zoned property located east of the subject site, he indicated his intent to utilize the area for parking provisions and picnic tables, for convenience of employees of the clinic, and noted that the entire residential lot, of which the R-1 portion of the rezone is a part, is owned by the applicant. He requested that the city allow provision of the 10-foot landscape screen on the existing R-1 property, and indicated his intent to maintain 7200 square feet as required by the zoning code within the lot area. The Examiner inquired regarding the elevation of the proposed structure. Mr. Brown advised that the roof of the building will be flat and equipment will be located elsewhere within the facility and not on the roof. Mr. Clemens indicated the height of the south elevation of 14 feet and 22 feet on the north elevation from parking lot level to the top of the roof. Dr. Brown advised that the elevation of the site is lower than existing residential lots located east of the site, fencing on certain portions currently exists, and the development would not visually impact the surrounding area. He indicated his opinion that provision of recommended setbacks and landscaping would severely limit the development of the site. The Examiner inquired if the rezone proposal for the R-1 property would be scaled down to comply with the 7200 square footage requirement. Dr. Brown advised that plans designating the required square footage had been submitted, but the city would not approve them. The Examiner inquired if the applicant had any objection to improving the existing substandard water main. Dr. Brown indicated his concurrence in the requirement. Referencing Section L.2 of the Planning Department Analysis contained in Exhibit #1 which pertains to substandard design of the proposed staff area, the Examiner requested a recommendation for resolution from Mr. Clemens. Mr. Clemens advised that any spaces in excess of the required number could be designed in any manner satisfactory to the applicant to supplement the required parking area. The Examiner requested clarification of the parking requirement in relationship to the square footage of the office space contained within the clinic. Mr. Clemens and Dr. Brown reviewed the parking requirement if all useable space totaling 5,000 square feet in the building is eventually converted to office use and advised that the proposed 27 parking spaces would exceed the requirement. The Examiner inquired regarding the practical effects of a one-way versus two-way circulation pattern. Mr. Clemens advised that the recommended 10-foot landscape area on the northeastern portion of the property would limit the maximum driveway width to 18 feet which would be too narrow to allow a two-way traffic circulation pattern through the site. Dr. Brown questioned the necessity of the 10-foot landscape screen in lieu of five feet required by the zoning code. Mr. Clemens advised that a separation of uses is necessary to protect existing residents from potential noise and air pollution resulting from clinic traffic on the subject site, and in the past the Examiner has required as much as a 50-foot buffer for the purpose of separation of land uses. The Examiner requested testimony in support of the application. There was no response. He then requested testimony in opposition. Responding was: William C. Sharpsteen 1075 Lynnwood Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Sharpsteen indicated that although he does not oppose the rezone from R-2 to R-3 of the future site of the proposed clinic, he objected to rezone of a portion of an existing single family lot for the purpose of parking since his residence abuts the site and creation of negative visual and noise impact from the rear of his property would occur as well as depreciation of the value of his home. Responding was: Roy White 1081 Lynnwood Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. White also indicated support of the proposed development but objected to creation of a parking lot in close proximity to his residence. He advised that because his home _. May 31, 1979 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Dr. Frederick R. Brown FILE NO. R-336-79, SP-337-79 LOCATION: Southeast corner of N.E. 11th• Place and Kirkland Avenue N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks approval for rezone of two parcels totaling 24,000 square feet at the intersection of Kirkland Avenue N.E. and N.E. llth Place from R-2 to R-3 to allow construction of a dental clinic. Also proposed is a rezone to R-3 of 4,000 square feet of an .11,000 square foot R-1 zoned and developed single family parcel adjacent to the rear of the primary rezone area. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval of the rezone from R-2 to R-3 RECOMMENDATION: only, subject to conditions; approval of Special Permit. Hearing Examiner:Denial. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary. report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on May 17, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on May 22, 1979 at 9:40 a.m. ,in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had• received and reviewed the Planning Department report; and the report .was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Senior Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map designating surrounding zoning Exhibit #3: Site Plan as submitted Exhibit #4: Floor Plan (2 sheets) Exhibit #5: Site Plan with staff comments . Mr. Clemens referenced Exhibit #5 which designates the Planning Department recommendation for provision of a one-way circulation pattern within the parking lot to expedite. traffic flow and alleviate congestion. The Examiner inquired 'if the designated pattern could be reversed or if the. department specifically recommended the ingress from Kirkland Avenue N.E. Mr. Clemens advised that the department had .no objection to reversal of the one way pattern. The Examiner inquired if the department had a recommendation for screening the R-3 residential property from the proposed clinic. Mr. Clemens advised that a high retaining wall and a six-foot wood fence currently exist on the R-3 property to the south, and along with landscape screening as part of. actual site development would more than adequately serve .to separate the land uses. . Responding to. the Examiner's inquiry regarding the use .of property.to the' north of the site, Mr. Clemens indicated that the parcel is currently vacant. . The Examiner inquired if the. Public Works Department recommended an LID for improvement'of the substandard water main on N.E. llth Street. Mr. Clemens indicated that to allow •site development, the applicant will be required to upgrade water lines and fire.flows for fire protection which can be accomplished through the city by various methods. The Examiner requested testimony by .the applicant. Responding was: Dr. Frederick R. Brown 1126 Kirkland Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 R-336-79 Page Four SP-337-79 12. There is a moderate rise in the subject property from east to west. A sharper slope is encountered from the south to the north with approximately an eight to ten foot difference across the site. Scrub grass predominates on the site with a few deciduous trees along Kirkland Avenue N.E. 13. If rezoned, that portion of the proposed rezone which is now R-1 would be surrounded on three sides (north, east and west) by R-1 properties developed with well-maintained single family homes. This small segment of the proposed rezone would be used for parking by the staff of the proposed dental clinic. This parking area would be located adjacent to the rear yards of these three single family homes. 14. The Planning Department report indicates that the area is generally in a transition from single family to multifamily uses. They also note that any transition has been quite slow and that the single family uses along Lynnwood Avenue N.E. are well maintained. They indicate that these homes should be the object of protection per the Comprehensive Plan's Objective No. 4 which states "Property values should be protected within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners, through effective control of land use. . ." The Planning Department recommends that the reclassification of the R-1 portion be denied as inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and incompatible with both surrounding zoning and uses. 15. . The applicant proposed to construct a professional office building (dental clinic) on the subject property pursuant to the procedures for a Special Permit (Section 4-722.B) . The building is to be one and one-half stories with a daylight basement. The proposed structure would be 22 feet in height. The applicant intends to provide 27 parking spaces which would be adequate even if the applicant developed the maximum permissible floor space. The Planning Department recommended the parking facility be landscaped with.a 10-foot wide buffer along the eastern property line (between the clinic and the single family homes) . The department also indicated that a one-way traffic pattern be established for the parking area in order to provide adequate maneuvering space in the narrow eastern portion of the lot. They also want final approval of a detailed landscaping plan for the site. 16. The Public Works Department indicated that the water main which serves the. property is inadequate and would have to be improved per code requirements and that standard fees would apply. The Fire Department noted that both access and fire hydrants must be available prior to building construction. 17. The applicant in his letter indicating the circumstances which justify granting the rezone notes that at one time the R-2 designation allowed the dental clinic; that both the lots north and south have been rezoned and are either developed with multi-family apartments or are to be so developed; and that other development has occurred creating a need for the proposed clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Rezone) 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate facts which indicate that the rezone meets at least one of three criteria of Section 4-3014 which provides in part that: a. The site has not been considered in a previous area wide rezone; b. The subject site is potentially zoned for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There have been demonstrated changes in the area since the last rezoning action. While it must be 'conceded that the applicant has demonstrated that some or all of these criteria have been met, the rezone and the special permit for which the applicant has also applied are integrally tied together and this indicates that the rezone should not be granted. R-336-79 Page Three SP-337-79 contains three stories, visual impact from the top story would be detrimental, and he stated that a transitional use should exist between single family residential zoning and the proposed R-.3 property to prevent spot zoning.. The Examiner requested further testimony in opposition to the request. There was no response. He' then requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. Mr. Clemens indicated an addition to the Planning Department recommendation to require approval of the rezone request prior to completion and approval of the special permit application. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. R-336-79 and SP-337-79 was closed by the Examiner at 10:20 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION/DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is, for approval of a reclassification of two, adjacent parcels of property see' attached map) from R-2 to R-3 (designated 'A' on map) and from R-l .to• R-3 designated 'B' on map) , respectively. The R-2 portion of the property is approximately 20,000 square feet and the R-1 parcel is a 4,000 square foot portion of an 11,000 square foot residential lot fronting on Lynnwood Avenue N.E. (5260 Lynnwood Avenue N.E.) . Also. requested ,is approval of a Special Permit to establish a professional office dental clinic) in a proposed R-3 zone. 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations 'in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing ,utilities are available and in close proximity. The existing water main will not adequately service the proposal. 6. The' proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-709A of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 7. The subject property is located' at the intersection of Kirkland Avenue N.E. and N.E. 11th Place. The property contains 24,000 square feet. The applicant •proposes reclassifying a 4,000 square foot' portion of an R-1 lot to R-3 and 20,000 square feet of R-2 property to R-3. The original proposal would have created a non-conforming 7,000 square foot lot in the R-1 zone. The applicant modified the proposal at the public hearing to leave the required 7,200 square foot lot area in the R-1 zone. 8. ' The applicant also applied for a special permit in conjun'ctionwith the rezone petition to allow the establishment of a dental clinic in the proposed R-3 District (Sections 4-709A.A(3) (b) & 4-722.B) . 9. Part of the original plat of the City of Renton, the subject site was rezoned from R-1 to R-2 by Ordinance No. 1922, dated November 29, 1961.. 10. The area in which the subject property is located has a mix of zoning types. It is bounded on the northeast and south by R-3 zoning, the classification applied for in this application. To 'the west along Lynnwood Avenue N.E. the property is zoned R-1. Included'within. this R-1 district is the portion of the R-1 lot ('B' on map) which the applicant proposes to reclassify R-3. West of the subject site along both Kirkland and N.E. llth, the.properties are zoned B-1. 11. The Comprehensive Plan for the area in which the' subject'property is located suggests that this property is suitable for medium density multi-family uses. The area across the intersecting street (Kirkland and llth) which is presently zoned B-1 is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as potentially suited for commercial purposes. R-336-79 Page Five SP-337-79 2. In order to recommend that a rezone be approved and that property be reclassified for a new and more intensive use it must be demonstrated that the property is needed for the new classification applied for. This is not the case. While the applicant desires reclassification'to R-3, a residential use district with some minor exceptions, the applicant intends to establish a dental clinic on the subject site. The proposed use is more properly located in a B-1 zone. It is not as if the applicant were attempting to establish 'a clinic in a large residential area in which no appropriately zoned property was located. The subject area is zoned mainly R-2 (the R-1 portion of the present application as indicated below is inappropriate for reclassification under the present circumstances) . Nearby is land with the appropriate zoning. The only justification to rezone to R-3, a residential district, would be to allow residential' development, not the intrusion of a clinic, a business use, into a residential district. 3. The applicant for a reclassification should not be allowed to demonstrate that the reclassification applied for meets the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, in this case medium density multi-family residential, and then use the property to establish a non-residential use. The uses confined to the east side of the Kirkland/llth intersection are 'exclusively residential. There is an apartment building to the 'south, and a proposed apartment building to the north. The western properties along Lynnwood are exclusively single, family residential. The clinic with its drive-through parking lot will generate a large number of daily uses of a driveway on the residential side of the zone boundary. Even if well designed, .the proposed use of the property will not make a good transition between. the R-1 zone to the west and the B-1 zone to the east. 4. The proposed rezone of the small' R-1 property to the east to the R-3. reclassification would create a totally imcompatible intrusion into the midst of the single family zones along Lynnwood. Avenue N.E. The use of any portion of the single family lot for more intensive use would violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan as noted in Finding No. 14. The proposed use as a parking lot of this portion Of the subject property located in the midst of rear yards of single family homes is therefore inappropriate, even with the grade differences which exist. 5. The use proposed by the applicant provides an important service, but even so, it ' should be located in an area which is classified to accommodate the proposed' use. Residential property should not be used for more intensive purposes unless circumstances strongly evidence no other area is available per Conclusion No. 2 above. The desire of the property owner to use his property for the proposed purpose is not enough. The applicant has failed, therefore, to demonstrate a need for more R-3 zoning especially for the proposed use. Apparently the only reason for the R=3 status is not to establish medium density residential usage but to establish by special permit a clinic on the site. Special Permit) Because the Examiner has recommended denial of the proposed rezone, a special permit application is not available to establish a clinic in the R-2 district. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Examiner that the reclassification of the R-2 property and the R-1 property to R-3 should be denied. In the event that the City.Council should approve the application, it' is the recommendation of the Examiner 'that the reclassification to R-3 be limited to that portion of ,the subject property contained in th'e present R-2 zone and that reclassification of the R-1 portion to R-3 be denied. ORDERED THIS 31st day of May, 1979. 17:4 Fred J. K man Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day Of May, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Dr. Frederick R. Brown, 1126 Kirkland Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 William C. Sharpsteen, 1075 Lynnwood Avenue N.E. , Renton; WA , 98055 Roy White, 1081 Lynnwood Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 R-336-79 Page six SP-337-79 TRANSMITTED THIS 31st day of May, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Joan Walker, Planning Commission Chairperson Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 14, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based On erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. T r.."L7 v V g 2 13 i II.- 3' L 0,, s9rtar-,•SC: I 1LEIIGOL.G.'s-'------ -- ---1: I a sr uRa'T r V, j}-- ., - 1 • .._,.fr' LP,.ay DNA '1-Mti ,7d.l) L. N lr'H• ,,.Ti o, gE•. J l AdL ! n 1 ,..__I ,,I 4st ,, s .• trj.t• V.Y•o py @ orC 4 i J pe Iti. r I-.. 0 ,i ,/1' c ` 3 e I; 14 • yo j•1 w,1\- I • I' , r•.,; 4,„,,lv,4„...• r q •,. .--- A:41 itiN I T 3 1 • 1 10.a d 9 H I I r F, h(, JrAit- 37 ffll. Jeq W ` ,i I , I ./ j Y/ 5, • r er5 1`t' U 4 1 1 7 f co q j L. Cif,/ J, o•s 1 It'v ao 5Ptlso.:cJ \ . 4• t ax 0 ( IP 4 1114. 1 G 2J% J*LPF4'9so 1 J 1.f. I i dre i is • ! ' •I • I A . ,I s, i L 1• 7•-...ae- .1 1 /7:-• • I !,It.Li fo op son . I Y I 1. yl o I L I RECEIVED L/ 1. / 1 n CITY OF RENT0 1 s.•I r'i 1 I HEARING EXAMINER ' Y. I + / iii tHIIT;'NO ,• MAY 221979 I 4.,. 4. li I 1T1 AM 1 p t 2 /l' ::51E; • 1PM '. :, n I Iri +' ' 146./i' ' ' ' 'I{ 7,R1311111IIII21 1 I• 1 t i /I i Plir•o o ) yy J I I Y A I1.! 4 4. s1 :.b AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 31st day of May 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this = day of uv\ 19Z6\ . Notary Public in and for the State- of Washington, residing at Renton' Application, Petition or Case: Dr. Frederick R. Brown; R-336-79, SP-337-79 The minute6 contain a tint o, the pa't ie4 og necond) LAW OFFICES OF HARROLD HANIS, COMBS& FIORI Offices: RENTRN RENTON GEORGE FIORI,JR. MICHAEL M.HANIS Reply to: 405 SOUTH FOURTH DAVID L.HARPOLD LOREN D.COMBS RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 DAVID A.LITTLE TELEPHONE: (206) 228-1301 O 2 3 941 516 pt, UN 1979 t., June 14, 19790 RECEIVE C CITY of RENTON 'tiCouncilmembers OFFICE `Renton City Council A. LERf(S ti Renton, WA 98055 r? c Dear Councilmembers : On behalf of Dr. Frederick R. Brown, the decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner dated May 31, 1979 , and design- ated File No. R-336-79 and SP-337-79 is hereby appealed. The appellant is an aggrieved person pursuant to the Code of the City of Renton, and appeals the Examiner' s decision upon the basis of the following substantial errors in law or fact: 1. [Conclusion 1. ] The Examiner found that all of the criteria for a rezone have been met as to the property, but turned it down, anyway, because it is tied to a specific use - as a dental clinic' - which use the Examiner later determined will "provide an important service" Conclusion 5) . It is error to turn down an application because the applicant has a specific project in mind, especially a beneficial one. 2. [Conclusion 2. ] The Examiner finds that t] he proposed use is more properly located in a business zone. " The city code §4-709A provides that clinics are an appropriate use in R-3 if not "unduly detrimental to surrounding property. " The Examiner found no detriment to sur- rounding property caused by the applicant' s proposed use. To state a use, in general, is more appropriate in one area than another is error in law. The Code nowhere indicates a clinic is more proper in a B-1 zone, but provides for such a use in B-1 or R-3 , under the proper circumstances in either case. The use is wholly consistant with the zoning proposed. 2- Councilmembers Renton City Council Renton, WA 98055 3. [Conclusion 2 . ] The Examiner states The only' justification to rezone to R-3, a residential district; , would be to allow residential development, not the intrusion of a clinic, a business use, into . a: residential district. This is error 'in law. . A rezone: may be granted to accomodate any permitted use, ' and clinics are a, permitted use. It is error to conclude R-3 is strictly a residential zone and ..then prohibit all but residential uses. The .Code allows several uses, depending upon circumstances of- the ,property. A clinic is just as consistant under the Code with R-3 as is an apartment' building. 4 . [Conclusion `3. ] The Examiner concludes that .an applicant " . . . should not be allowed to demonstrate that the re classification applied for meets, the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, in this case medium density multifamily residential, and then use the property to establish a non-residential use. " This is an error in law. The applicant should be allowed to, and did demonstrate his proposed use is consistant with comprehensive planning for .the area. . Residential use is only one of the use• s consistant. with medium density residential. The name 'given' to a planning classification should not be allowed to govern the nature and meaning of the classification. Clinics are consistant with the designation of Medium Density Residential. • 5. [Conclusion 3. ] "Even if well designed, the proposed use of the property will not make a good transition between the R-1 zone.;to the west and the B-1 zone to the east. " This is factually in error. All persons who are' resident in' the area agree 3- Councilmembers Renton City Council Renton, WA 98055 that the proposed clinic use .will make a better transition than uses that are available under the current R-2 zoning. Their 'testimony was not con- sidered by the Examiner because all felt the project was 'so- meretorious it would receive approval' without their testimony.. A petition',will be provided to the Council which it is requested will be considered by the Council as a report of persons interested pursuant to Code §4-3016. 6 . [Conclusion .4. ] The Examiner' s decision that the. R-1 to R-3 portion of the appli- cation should be denied may have pre- judiced or affected his decision regard- ing the remainder of the application. That specific zoning change was not in- di_spensible to the project. It was added at the suggestion of the planning staff. The project can be completed, consistant in all ways with City standards , without that zoning change. 7. [Conclusion 4 ; Finding 14 . ] "Property values should be protected within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners , The Examiner' s conclusion that this project will depress property values is insupportable. All property values in the area will either be unaffected 'or .enhanced. ., 8. [Conclusion 5. ] "The use proposed by the applicant provides an important service, but even so, it should be located in an area which is classified to accomodate the proposed use. " It is error to conclude an R-3 •classification is not defined to include clinics. The Code clearly provides , for accomodation of clinics in R-3. 9 . The Examiner failed to : consider use of covenants 4- Councilmembers Renton City Council Renton, WA 98055 to protect from uses permitted by R-3 zoning which may not be as compatible with this area as a clinic (eg. large apartment buildings) . The Examiner has this authority pursuant to §4-3010 (B) l. The applicant is prepared to appropriately covenant the property as a condition of rezoning. 10. The Examiner failed to consider the fact that when this project was conceived it was consistent with R-2 zoning. The zoning ordinance subsequently changed, but the nature of changes in the area have been such as to make this clinic more, rather than less appropriate. Consideration should be given to the fact that this pro- perty was rezoned to prohibit clinics (by changing the definition of R-2) with no showing that a change in the area had made clinics an improper type of development. It can be fairly said that the applicant' s proposed use was prohibitted inadvertently. On the basis of the foregoing, it is respectfully requested that the City Council reverse the decision of the Land Use Hearing Examiner. HARPOLD, HANIS, COMBS & FIORI Michael M. Hanis Attorneys for Dr. Frederick Brown MMH:ad JITY OF RENT01 . NO 95 .3 ' FINANCE DEPARTMENT 6/ J RENTON-, WASHINGTON' 98055 L . 19 Ica RECEIVED OF \---\ (\_r \c\ \--;c0(\"\ 7-s 2-270 Occko TOTAL f.2, 7),_6(.7) • GWEN E. MARSHALLk, FINANCE DIRECTOR BY OF RA,A A 4. v di o THE CITY OF RENTON z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0 94TED SEPSE14 June 14, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. R-336-79, SP-337-79; Dr. Frederick R. Brown Request for Rezone and Special Permit. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation, dated May 31, 1979, regarding the referenced application. An appeal of the recommendation was received on June 14, 1979 within the appeal period established by ordinance, and is also attached for your review. The complete file regarding this matter will be transmitted to the City Clerk this date, and will be placed on the Council agenda on July 2, 1979. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the office of the undersigned. Sincerely, i(6"11 Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Attachments 0 THE CITY OF RENTON 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 A = CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD O, p O CITY CLERK O I I., SEPS - June 15, 1979 APPEAL FILED BY MICHAEL M. HANIS, ATTORNEY, FOR DR. FREDRICK BROWN RE: Appeal of Land Use Examiner's Decision Dated May 31, 19.79; Dr. Fredrick Brown, Rezone R-336-79 and Special Permit SP-337-79 To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the public records office this date; along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code, as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will be reviewed by the Council 's Planning and Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meetings if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of July 2, 1979 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Second Floor, Renton Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON q 776 ( Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st cc: Mayor Planning Dept. Planning & Development Committee (3) Public Works Director Hearing Examiner Finance Director Ron Nelson, Building Div. Iy OF R THE CITY OF RENTONtiJ Q7 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD CITY CLERK P47-FO June 15 , 1979 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. COUNTY OF KING DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly 'sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to not interested in this matter. That on the 15th day of June 1979, at the hour of 5 :00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by. first class mail, a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY MICHAEL M. HANIS, ATTORNEY FOR DR. FREDRICK BROWN REGARDING REZONE R-336-79 AND SPECIAL PERMIT SP-37-79 TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD. y Delores A. Mead, City- lerk SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 15th day of ,June, 1979. Notary Pub1i,d 'i ri and . for the State: of,•'Washington, residing in Renton sb RENTON CITY COUNCIL. Regular Meeting July 2 , 1979 Municipal Building Monday , 8: 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City. Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President; CHARLES F. SHANE (Arrived COUNCIL shortly) THOMAS W. TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, GEORGE J . PERRY, MARGARET L. PROCTOR, RICHARD M. STREDICKE. CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; LAWRENCE WARREN, IN ATTENDANCE City Attorney; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; RICHARD HOUGHTON, Public Works Department; BATTALION CHIEF MATTHEWS, Fire; CAPT. JAMES PHELAN, Police Department; ROBERT HUFNAGLE, Park Department; MICHAEL PARNESS, Administrative Assistant. MINUTE APPROVAL Addition Page 4: "Councilman Stredicke inquired whether Student 6/25/79 Home Services, Bellevue, was licensed to operate within the City. " Councilman Stredicke noted since that time he has been advised the company has no permit; they have been advised of need. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PROCTOR, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES. OF JUNE 25, 1979 AS AMENDED. CARRIED. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Mayor Delaurenti presented Delores A. Mead, City Clerk, with Policy and Procedure Special Award engraved placque from International institute, of Manual - City Clerk- Municipal Clerks 33rd annual meeting in BalHarbour, Florida; Outstanding First Place Award in cities over 25,000 for Policy and Procedure Publication of Year Manual . Mrs. Mead accepted the congratulations with thanks, noting need under the Public Disclosure law for public access to records and index. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. SE, called attention to dance 7/21/79 Musicians Hall . Senior Center Peggy Cummins, Municipal Arts Commission, requested letter from Stained Glass Agenda. MOVED SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE, READ ITEM 9.a. CARRIED. Window Letter from Peggy Cummins, Chairman 1% for Arts Committee, noted Donated by offer of donation from Mr. and Mrs. Charles A. Ruud for funds Mr. and Mrs.for a stained glass window for the new Senior Citizens' Center Charles A. Ruud' . and explained the process by which a selection..was made. The letter recommended the Council accept the donation with appreci- ation to Mr. and Mrs. Ruud, concur in the jury's design selection submitted by Hill Associates and authorize the Administration to execute the necessary contract. The letter reported the Commission was pleased with the response received from Northwest artists throughout the competition and that the art piece will be enjoy- able addition to the new Senior Center quiet lounge area on first floor facing the river and courtyard, noting window contains subtle shades and 50% minimun transparent glass. " MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHINPOCH, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMISSION; CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke noted Charles Ruud as former owner of the. Record Chronicle and present owner of the Record Stationery and Office Supply.. Dr. Frederick Brown William Sharpsteen, 1075 Lynnwood Ave. NE, presented petition Rezone R-336-79 and bearing signatures of 12 homeowners requesting reversal of the Special Permit Hearing Examiner's decision of 5/31/79 and allow the building SP 337-79 of a medical/dental building by Dr. Fred Brown on Kirkland Ave. NE R-2 to R-3 and NE 11th P1 . as clinics are needed and would be best buffer for Dental Clinic between residential and business areas. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND and SHINPOCH, SUSPEND RULES AND ITEMS 9.d.c.and b. BE' TAKEN FROM AGENDA Appeal by Dr. Brown FOR.READING. CARRIED. Continued Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry: presented report recommending that the Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner in part regarding Frederick Brown rezone R-336-79 and SP 337-79 and listed errors of fact and law regarding Con- clusions No. 1 , 2, 3 and 5 and various matters regarding Special RENTON CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting July 2 , 1979 Municipal Building Monday , 6 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MT NUTFS CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pro tem Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Special Meeting to order. ROLL CALL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President; MARGARET PROCTOR, EARL CLYMER, THOMAS W. TRIMM. MOVED CLYMER, SECOND TRIMM, ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS BE EXCUSED: Richard M. Stredicke, George J. Perry and Charles F. Shane. MOTION CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS. DEL MEAD, City Clerk; SHARON GREEN, Personnel Director; MICHAEL IN ATTENDANCE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant. Executive Session The Council convened in Executive Session to discuss labor negotiations with City' s Negotiator, William W. Treverton of Conner, Gravrock, Treverton, Inc. of Bellevue. Time: 6:02 p.m. Council reconvened in the Special Meeting. Roll Call : SHINPOCH, PROCTOR, CLYMER, TRIMM. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 6:50 p.m. 4 a 4446Q.‘C Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk Renton City Council 7/2/79 Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued Dr. Brown Rezone Permit issuance and recommended that the Council find that the and Appeal use proposed under special permit application will not be detri- Continued mental to the adjacent properties or welfare of community. Further the committee recommended that the Examiner's decision be affirmed insofar as it denied the application for rezone of the R-1 property to R-3 and that the remainder of the decision be reversed to read as follows: The application for reclassification of the R-2 property to R-3 is granted. The application for Special Permit to allow a professional office in, an R-3 zone is granted subject to conditions (3) . MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT AND REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Michael N. Read Hearing Examiner's decision. of 5/22/79 for denial of SP 338-79 Special Permit application to develop self-storage facility as an integrated office/ SP 338-79 retail business park (Renton Business Park) (B-1 zone) . A . and request for reconsideration was filed with Examiner 5/30 and Appeal denied 6/1/79. Appeal filed 6/13/79. Planning and Development Committee having reviewed the matter, recommended Council reverse the decision of the Examiner based on error of law Conclusion No. 6, 7 and. 8; and recommended that the Council find that the proposed. use is a similar use to the specific uses allowed in the B-1 zone and conclude that the proposed use is allowed as a matter of right in the B-1 zone. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. Councilman Stredicke inquired of access from property onto NE 4th and requested report from. the Administration regarding traffic in general area. Planning Director noted no access proposed to either Union NE or Monore NE. See later MOTION CARRIED, Councilman Stredicke voted NO. MOVED BY PERRY, Ordinance SECOND CLYMER, REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE.. CARRIED.- First City Equities Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry acknowledged Rezone G to MP this being date set. for Hearing Examiner's decision regarding R-328-79 Earlington First City Equities Rezone 328-79 to come before the Council , Industrial Park matter having been appealed 6/13/79 by Attorney Robert McBeth and representing Ernie Lueckenotte- and Richard Haaland, operators Appeal 6/13/79 of the Earlington Golf Course. Committee Chairman Perry noted change in meeting date as applicant could not be present and Continued announced 7/12 7:30 meeting; that the matter will be before the' City Council 7/16/79 at the 8:00 p.m. meeting. Audience: Doug Prichard requested Council acquire the property. Condominium John Goff, 4300 NE Sunset Blvd. , Springtree Apartments, requested Conversion information regarding condominium conversion ordinance. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER, SUSPEND RULES AND PRESENT REPORT. Planning and Development Committee report noted review of condominium con- versions and recommended that an ordinance establishing a mora- torium be referred to the Ways and Means Committee. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF COMMITTEE.* Persons present making inquiries: Caren Wharton, 24532 35th Ave. S. Kent, South King County Tenants Union, asked matter not be tied Ordinance #3326 up in committee with so many affected. *CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, 90-Day Moratorium SECOND CLYMER, SUSPEND RULES AND PRESENT ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READ- on Condominium ING. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented Conversion to ordinance declaring a housing emergency and imposing a moratoriumOctober1 , 1979 on the conversion of rental units to condominiums and providing Pending penalties. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADVANCE ORDINANCE TO Adoption of SECOND AND FINAL READINGS.* Persons present: Mike Poynter, Regulations 16803 SE 254th, Kent, asked moving expenses be paid to tenants Ordinance noting King County ordinance retroactive to cover expenses and asked that assurance be given that apartment passes building and fire codes. Councilwoman Shinpoch explained committee meetings and desire for good ordinance. City Attorney Warren explained an ordinance cannot be made retroactive. Dennis Whalen, 4308 NE Sunset; Bob Kresge, 4300 NE Sunset asked adoption of King County ordinance. *MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance placed on second and final readings declaring a housing emergency and imposing a moratorium on the conversion of rental units to condominums to October 1 , 1979. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, ADOPT ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: 6-AYE: SHINPOCH, TRIMM, CLYMER, PERRY, PROCTOR AND STREDICKE; ONE-NO: SHANE. MOTION CARRIED SETTING MORATORIUM. Renton City Council 7/2/79 Page 3 Recess MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Time: 9:30 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:50 p.m. Roll Call : All Council Members. present. Introduction Mayor Delaurenti introduced King County Councilwoman Patricia Thorpe. Mrs. Thorpe explained King County condominium ordinance. Further discussion ensued. Caren Wharton explained tenant rights. OLD BUSINESS Councilman Perry inquired of legality and identification problems for persons for persons using surnames only on election signs. Councilman Stredicke asked removal of new cars parked on City right-of-way in vicinity of Burnett Ave. proposed linear park. Mayor Delaurenti advised corrective measures will be taken. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented report Committee Report , recommending second and final readings of the following ordinances: Ordinance #3327 First readings ,6/25/79) Street Vacation Ordinance read vacating a portion of California Ave. (VAC-4-79) Portion of also known as N. 7th St. , as petitioned by Wong. MOVED BY CLYMER, California Ave. SECOND PERRY, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3328 An ordinance was read appropriating $6,910 to be received from Appropriation Burlington Northern Railroad for payment of road construction Monster Road work on Monster Road. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE Construction ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL.: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3329 An ordinance was read rezoning property from R-1 to R-3 located Banchero Rezone at the southwest corner of NE 12th St. and Edmonds Ave. NE; Mike R-234-78 Turner agent for Banchero and Florer. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. 'ROLL CALL: 6-AYES AND ONE- NO: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke requested confirmation of covenants and dedication of right-of-way, being confirmed by the City Clerk. Ordinance #3330 Ordinance was read rezoning property from G to R-4 located at Schwartzenberger west side of Shattuck Ave. S. at intersection of S. 6th St. Rezone R-339-79 MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND CLYMER, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3331 An ordinance was read rezoning property from G to R-3 located Nunn Rezone approximately 750 ft. south of NE 4th St. along Queen Ave. exten- R-342-79 sion between Greenwood Cemetery on west and City property on east. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT AS READ. Councilman Stredicke inquired re covenants and access, being advised by Engineer Houghton that by consolidation of parcels the access is gained. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYE; ONE NO: STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the following ordinances:. Self Storage Ordinance read amending Title IV City Code to provide for use Facilities of self-storage facilities to be allowed by Special Permit. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke noted the ordinance was not retroactive. Ordinance #3332 Ordinance read authorizing acquisition of property, and providing Acquisition of for payment, authorizing the City Attorney to prepare condmenation Cedar River Trail petition for acquisition for construction of Cedar River Trail Properties system. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE THE ORDINANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings authorizing acquisition of Haddad/Jordan/LaRue properties, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: SHINPOCH, TRIMM, CLYMER, PROCTOR, STREDICKE; 2-NO: SHANE AND PERRY. MOTION CARRIED. 0'`'N NA June 27, 1979 Renton City Council Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Councilmembers: We, the undersigned homeowners, have a 'common interest in a sub- ject coming before the Council at the meeting of July 2, 1979, We desire that a :denial clinic be built in'the lot at Kirkland Avenue, N.E. and N.E. llth Place, and so, we feel that the recommendation of the examiner to deny Dr. Frederick Brown's request for permission to erect. a building and establish a clinic at this site should' be reversed by the Council as a whole. We feel that'a -smell';building',= with necessary parking area, will serve the area best as a buffer between residential and business areas. .And, dental/medical clinics are badly needed in this area. If a large building, such as a three story apartment were built • there, it would be an eyesore, and. lower the value of the residences immediately involved. Very truly yours, cp. 7' 7 u 6-. yix,:_ej.e.,..4) . . i o c 4 7 • ,. i 2d-sT , e-u,# raG /-17:12-11-41,VeY GP 29, ", o g / 07 . Well/ 4„.0.E --21(?r.' i air-itsz,... --._ z.f-?...,.. 6 ( Z .- , J1 , ace4 06( 77 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT JULY 2 , 1979 FREDRICK BROWN REZONE R-336-79 and SP-337-79 The Planning and Development Committee has considered the appeal of the above-mentioned decision dated May 31, 1979 , and recommends that the City Council reverse the decision of the Hearing Examiner in part, based upon the following errors of fact and law: 1. Conclusion No. 1 is in error in that the application for rezone must be considered independently of a concurrent application for a special permit for a particular use under the zoning code. 2. Conclusion No. 2 is in error in that there is no need for demon- stration that the property is needed for the zoning classification applied for. 3. Conclusion No. 2 is in error in that a rezone application must be considered in light of the criteria of Section 4-3014 rather than the use to which the property is proposed to be put. 4 . Conclusion Nos. 3 and 5 are in error in that the applicant may use R-3 property for any use allowed by the zoning code, including non-residential uses set forth therein. 5. The Hearing Examiner ' s conclusion regarding issuance of the Special Permit is in error in that the applications for rezone and the special permit must be considered independently. In view of the Committee' s following recommendation to reverse the Hearing Examiner ' s decision and to grant the rezone to R-3 , the application for special permit must be considered. The Committee further recommends that the City Council find, based upon the record before the Hearing Examiner, that the use proposed under the special permit application will not be unduly detrimental to adjacent and surrounding properties, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The Committee further recommends that the Hearing Examiner ' s decision be affirmed insofar as it denied the application for rezone of the R-1 property to R-3, and that the remainder of the decision be reversed to read as follows: The application for reclassification of the R-2 property to R-3 is granted. The application for special permit to allow a professional office in an R-3 zone pursuant to Section 4-709A (A) (3) (a) is granted subject to the following conditions: d Planning and Development Committee Committee Report July 2, 1979 Page 2 1) Review and approval by Planning Department of landscaping and sight screens, including a minimum ten foot sight-obscuring screen separating the staff parking area from the R-1 single family property to the east. 2) Final Public Works Department approval of plans for public improvements per appropriate codes and ordinances . 3) Provision for fire protection per Fire Department requirements. G ge Perry, Chairman cnRzas nwr o0(.Qv Barbara Shinpoch C. r lymer : e - 336 -79 Renton City Council 7/9/79 Page 3 Ordinances and Resolutions - Continued First Reading The Ways and Means Committee recommended first reading of the following two ordinances: An ordinance was read rezoning property located at southeast corner of NE llth Place and Kirkland Ave. NE from R-2 to R-3, known as the Brown Rezone R-336-79. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. First Reading An ordinance was read rezoning property located at the southwest corner of SW 13th St. and Seneca Ave. SE from G-6000 to Light Industry.L-1 , known as the Pre-Cut International of Washington Rezone R-344-79 (Restrictive Covenants recorded. ) MOVED CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL REFER BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM- MITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. VOUCHER APPROVAL The Ways and Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers 23907 through #24058 in the amount of $375;370.88 having received departmental certification that merchandise and/or services have been received or rendered; also included LID #302 Revenue Warrant R-39 in amount of $210,065.90 and Cash Warrants C-88 $193,024.36; C-89 $9,814.53; C-90 $4,873.70; C-91 $31 .62 C-92 $1 ,562.28; C-93 $729.37; C-94 $30.04. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, APPROVE VOUCHERS AS RECOMMENDED. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows items included: Claim for Damages A Claim for Damages was filed by Mary D. Guinn, 3401 NE 12th St. , in amount of $182.70, alleging City truck backed into fence located at her home. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Claim for Damages A Claim for Damages was filed by Janis L. Barnhart, Box 895, alleging fall at Liberty Park resulted in broken ankle.' Refer to the City Attorney and Insurance Carrier. Surplus Equipment Letter from Finance Director Gwen Marshall announced a Public Auction of surplus property on 7/28/79 at 10:00 a.m. at the City Shops located 1st N. and N.Williams: list of equipment available at Finance Dept. Equipment to be sold AS IS. The letter requested referral to the Ways and Means Committee for resolution to surplus.. Council concur. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Approved CORRESPONSENCE Board of Ethics Letter from Susan Ringwood, President, Renton School Board Appointment replied to letter of 6/26 from the Mayor reporting Mr. W. Johnson Representing was not appointed to the Renton Board of Ethics by the Council School Board because he is a declared candidate for County Council . The' letter asked guidance to the Board in their attempt to nominate at the next Board meeting to fill vacancy left by Dr. Hoffman. The letter noted City Ordinance #3180. creating the Ethics Board does not appear to deny membership to potential candidates nomi- nated by the Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce, the Renton clergy, the League of Women Voters of King County South, the King County Labor Council or the Renton School Board. The letter noted other school board members may become candidates for political offices and asked what impact this would have on names which may be submitted to the Mayor for consideration. Next School Board meeting 7/12/79; reply asked by that date. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND STREDICKE, THE APPOINTMENT NOT BE MADE (VACANCY NOT FILLED) UNTIL AFTER NOVEMBER ELECTION. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, THE CODE OF ETHICS ORDINANCE BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO REVIEW MEMBERSHIP OF THE ETHICS BOARD. CARRIED. Renton City Council 7/9/79 Page 4 Correspondence - Continued Short-Term Letter from Steve Bakko, President, Renton Merchant Association Peddler Licenses requested revision of the City Code regarding short-term peddlers licenses (Chapter 25, Title 5) and denial of such licenses and permits in the future. The letter also asked the Police Depart- ment be instructed to enforcethe prohibition and to penalize offenders. The letter stated the reasons that the short-term licenses were objectionable. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, REFER MATTER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE TO REVIEW AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY TRIMM, SECOND PERRY, refer to the Ways and Means Committee. ROLL CALL: 3-AYE: SHANE, TRIMM, PERRY; 3-NO: SHINPOCH, CLYMER, STREDICKE; MAYOR VOTED NO. MOTION FAILED to refer to the Ways and Means Committee. ROLL CALL ON ORIGINAL MOTION: 4-AYES: SHINPOCH, CLYMER, PERRY, STREDICKE; 2-NO: SHANE AND TRIMM. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Perry discussed information learned at Planning Association meeting in Yakima and newsletter items including ordinance passed by Snohomish County and Issaquah for assessment on every home or apartment constructed. City Attorney Warren advised he had obtained the ordinance from. Issaquah, noting fee was business and occuptation tax on construction. MEETING CONTINUED MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONTINUE MEETING 10:25 p.m.TO 7:00 PM JULY 16, 1979. CARRIED. oadeitz,va . 7i &td Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3 3 3 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM RES- IDENCE DISTRICT (R-2) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-3) R-336-79/BROWN WHEREAS under Chapter 7, Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton", as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-2); and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the Planning Department on or about April 16, 1979, which petition was duly referred to the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about May 22, 1979, and said matter having been duly considered by the Hearing Examiner and said zoning request having been denied and the matter having been appealed to the City Council of the City of Renton and said City Council having reversed the Hearing Examiner's Decision and said zoning request being in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-3) as hereinbelow specified: the Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning, to-wit: Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Graceland Terrace, as recorded in King County. Plats Volume 60, Page 64. Said, property being located at Southeast corner of N.E. 11th Place and Kirkland Avenue N.E.) SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be,effective upon its passage, approval and five days after its publication. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, this 2 3rlday of July, 1979. Delores A.19teaa, city •C1Qrk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 234day of July, 1979. Charles J. elaurenti, Mayor Approved as to forms Lawrence J. War City Attorney Date of Publication: July 27, 1979 7; li'.."••••t••,,,', •••q 1:'if/...., _ a. 1 1: I ,':. t:.0.4:" •'1 i ':1, ' . ' .. i1....,,,,;:..i.,. .. i,. ,.:. ... Alj' ....,, iii 4` .. q ,Velli .. 1; J is'; I C 1, R:R,f.!'. It i Not`''R 1 f. ,„ ' t 11.0. 111. t* ... O.•••37 ge.... ifiii,I. 0 I . v tZ, r 1 4t"` ,ra p ito t' r ` F j 3_A i. a ' it . r r, 1 7 r I1 I7 . 1 . ` 1 I' 4• re 3 l I I• ... 1, i . 1;• 1 . r.,. I l R a; 1 t ,, i',., ift!j ,, , ir J i1 i /.• : 1 I:si 1 i1 i 'I •T. OF R4, 36- 27 o THE CITY OF RENTON Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ma CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 0o co• CITY CLERK o91, SEP, t,t0 July 27, 1979 ° Dr. Fred R. Brown 1126 Kirkland Ave. N. E. Renton, Wa. 98055 Dear 'Dr. Brown, RE: Rezone 336-79 The Renton City Council, during its regular meeting on Monday, July 23, 19 /9 has adopted Ordinance No. 3337. A copy is enclosed for your information. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead; C.M.C. City Clerk DAM:j.eb/db Enclosure n' 4,4n. ,'' 4. c•.:;; CITY OF Fier 'vr' ciG. ®x :;' 4) ORE JCE'NO;,333- •r"; , AN. UH INAANCE 'O ' THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 23t;-?9CHANGINGTHEZON-t ING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPER- TIES WITHIN THE CITY Affidavit of .Publication I OF RENTON FROM RE- i SIDENCE DISTRICT(R- 2)TO RESIDENCE DIS- TRICT (R-3) R-336- STATE OF WASHINGTON I 79/BROWN COUNTY OF KING SS. terWHEREAST tle under Cha ng Chap- i lations) of Ordinance No. y 1628 known as the"Code of i General Ordinances of the being first duly sworn on I City of Renton",as amend- ed, and the maps and re- ports adopted in conjunction ' oath,deposes and says that ,,,is the j ... of i therewith, the property I‘HE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE,a newspaper published four(4) I hereinbelow described has times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and heretofore been zoned as has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred [Residence District (R-2); to,printed and published in the English language continually as a news- and paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, WHEREAS proper peti- and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained j tion for change of zone at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton , classification of said proper- Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the ty has been filed with the Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, ' Planning Department on or about April 16, 1979,which petition was duly referred to Washington.That the annexed is a i%r" ' 0"' `•(-',--• ,. ,, C the Hearing Examiner for investigation, study and 1. public hearing,and a public Public Notices j hearing having been held PASSED BY THE CITY thereon on or about May 22, COUNCIL, this 23rd day of as it was published in regular issues(and 1979, and said matter hay- July, 1979. not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period ing been duly considered by Delores A. Mead, the Hearing Examiner and City Clerk said zoning request having APPROVED BY THE i been denied and the matter MAYOR this 23rd day of of i consecutive issues,commencing on the having been appealed to the July, 1979. City Council of the City of Charles J.Delaurenti, Renton and said City Coun-Mayor day of (.I ?•. '"19 /' ...,and ending the cil having reversed the Hear- Approved as to form: ing Examiner's Decision and Lawrence J.Warren, said zoning request being in 1City Attorney conformity with the City's Published in the Daily Re-day of - 19 ,both dates , Comprehensive Plan, as cord Chronicle July 27,inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- amended, and the City 1 1979. R5704scribersduringallofsaidperiod. That the full amount of the fee Council having duly consi- 1_ dered all matters relevant I i thereto, and all parties hay-charged for the foregoing publication is•the sum of $.-::.e(:;,which ing been heard appearing inhasbeenpaidinfullattherateofperfolioofonehundredwordsforthe support thereof or in o osi-first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent lion thereto,.NOW THERE- J! insertion. FORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO OR- J.i';r 1 s'' .;2.r,a S DAIN AS FOLLOWS:, l rSECTIONI:The following described property in the U_n30CityofRentonishereby6.. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , rezoned to Residence Dis- I N,. 1 trict (R-3) as hereinbelow?o cc specified: the Planning Di- ' ® — u 19 I rector is hereby.authorized IA J and directed to change the' 1 :1 y C,? maps of the Zoning Ordi- nance, as amended,to evi-! Notary I'- in and for a State of Wash' gton, dense said rezoning,to-wit: I residing at Kent,King ounty. Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Grassland Terrace, as f ' 1111 recorded in King County Thr Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June is Volume 60, Page C,7 64.9th, 1955. Said property being lo-— Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words-and-figures,— cated at Southeast corn- adopted by the newspapers of the State.er of N.E.11 th Place and Kirkland Avenue N.E.) SECTION II: This Ordi- __ - nance shall be effective up- on its passage,approval and I five days after its publica- ti_ _on. V.P.C.Form No.87 OF R4,4A 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 maa CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0. 9A 235-2550 0 SEP1 M Q MEMORANDUM July 9 , 1979 TO : Del Mead , City Clerk FROM: Planning Department RE : PROPOSED ORDINANCE - BROWN REZONE R-336-79 The proposed ordinance regarding the subject rezone has been reviewed by this department and is considered accurate. In addition , a legal description which has been confirmed as correct by the Engineerong Division is attached for inclusion along with a site map. wr Attachments f,2, : g - -.:3--,Ji0- 77 Renton City Council 7/23/79 Page 3 Recess' MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. 10:38 p.m. Mayor Delaurenti explained an early morning appoint- ment, turned the meeting over to Council President Shinpoch and Mayor Pro tem left the Chambers. The Council meeting reconvened at 10:47 p.m. Shinpoch Roll : Council Members present as previously shown except Council- manShane returned to the Chambers at 10:55 p.m. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ordinance Ways and Means Committee Member Perry requested public hearing Regulating regarding conversion of apartment houses to condominiums. MOVED Condo Conversions PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, SET HEARING AUGUST 13, 1979. CARRIED. Ways and Means Ways and. Means Committee report recommended second and final Committee Report readings for the following ordinances which had been on first reading July 9, 1979: Ordinance' #3337 An ordinance was read rezoning. property from R-2 to R-3 located Brown Rezone at the SE corner of NE llth P1 . and Kirkland NE, known as the Brown Rezone R-336-79. . MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND PROCTOR, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: 6-AYES: SHINPOCH, SHANE, TRIMM, CLYMER, PERRY, PROCTOR, STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3338 An ordinance was read rezoning property from G to L-1 located Pre-Cut at the southwest corner of SW 13th St. and Seneca SE, known International as the Pre-cut International of Washington. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinances The Ways and Means Committee recommended the following ordinances First Reading for first reading: Ordinance #3339 An ordinance was read confirming assessments for LID 284, sewers LID 284 Final in area of Jones Ave. NE between NE 40th and NE 44th with 7 3/4 Jones Ave. NE per cent per annum interest. Robert A. and Clarissa M. Fawcett Sewers protested. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following read- ing, MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3340 An ordinance was read appropriating funds in amount of $4,500 Appropriation &from unanticipated revenue for payment of stained glass window Transfer - Stained for the new Senior Center. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, Glass Window SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings, MOVED PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3341 An ordinance was read vacating a portion of Lakeview Ave. and Street Vacation Renton Ave. between NE 4th St. and NE .5th Place as petitioned Lakeview and by Wall and Redekop and Swartfager. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, Renton at NE 4th SUSPEND RULES AND PLACE FOR SECOND READING. CARRIED. Following reading, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, ADOPT AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3342 , An ordinance was read making it unlawful for any person in charge Children in Vehicle of a vehicle to leave children under the age of eight years un- Unattended attended or under age of twelve years if in a tavern or where alcohol dispensed and requiring securing of vehicles. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE TO SECOND AND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Following readings, MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND PROCTOR, ADOPT AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. The Committee recommended the following resolutions for reading and adoption: Resolution #2284 A resolution was read setting public hearing 8/20/79 re vacation Alley Vacation of alley between N. 35th and N. 36th Streets, east of Burnett N. N. 35th and 36th petitioned by Brown/Strand <a,nd. set public hearing 8/20/79. MOVED BY VAC-.13-79) TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #3385 . A resolution was read supporting the. President's national plan Energy Conservation and effort for energy conservation as beneficial to the citizens of the United States. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Renton City Council 7/23/79 Page 4 Ways and Means The Ways and Means Committee reported that the Finance and Committee Report Utility Departments have provided them with estimates from 181 Utility Tax questionnaire responses which had been mailed to 310 utility Referral of 6/18) customers. The report stated the average savings for low-income elderly would amount o $41 .58 per year. This would result in a reduction to the Current Fund revenue of approximately 12,000 per year. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND TRIMM, REFER TO ADMINISTRATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION PRIOR TO NEXT YEAR'S BUDGET. CARRIED. Board. of Ethics The Committee report recommended that the Board of Ethics ordinance be referred to the Administration for review. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Voucher Approval The Ways and, Means Committee recommended approval of Vouchers No. 24064 through No. 24267 in the amount of $584,625.88 having received departmental certification as to receipt of merchandise and/or services. Approval also included. LID #302 Revenue Warrant R-40 in amount of $70,774.34, plus Cash Warrant C-95 $64,447.74 C-96 $6,129.60, C-97 $197.00; plus LID #307 R-5 $1 ,613.29 C-6 1 ,713.29. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND TRIMM, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows the items included. Fire Station Bid opening July 18, 1979 Landscaping for the Main Fire Station Landscaping No. 11 located at Mill Ave. S. and S. 2nd St. ; seven bids received. See attached tabulation. Refer to Public Safety Committee. Highway Annual certification from the State Department of Transportation Certification regarding State Highway Routes including transferred routes, limited access routes and certifications as, required by state law. Refer to Public Works Department., Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND PERRY, APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. CARRIED. Approval CORRESPONDENCE Letter from Renton Police Officers Guild, James Foust, President, Historic Building . presented a resolution declaring the building on Lots 18 and 19, Declaration Block 9, Town of Renton, a "Historic Building" (located at 1025 South 3rd St. ) The letter told the history of the building which Former. Puget Power was built in 1898. The Snoqualmie Falls Power Co. Sub-Station and then Holmes No. 2 is the oldest brick building in Renton and served as a Electric Building receiving and switching station for electricity from Snoqualmie at Mill Ave. S. Falls, Washington's first hydroelectric plant. The letter . and S. 3rd St. ) requested the declaration to establish historical value and to allow restoration under the "Historic Buildings" Section of the - Uniform Building Code. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL CON- CUR AND REFER TO I4AYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. It was noted that arrangements are being made by the Police Guild to rent the build- ing to the Renton Area Youth Services. MOTION CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Shane requested the Mayor's Office advise what services received from King County for tax monies received. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. 11 :25 p.m. Delores A. Mead, C.M .. City Clerk