The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA80-006t4-0 6onaI oC Duna _ -. tj . w 0, , et. , - 1 .,_ R1plcy L. Gr , No. . w ' _ Rei, foh cy8055 l- ice. IA) GSh,`...,5 O j- 7)fV ' 1-1-1,,...., Occ..14:.1.0 .a..).8 . 6 3 I A f O L I 6`;___ IZr . i 2.opoS c Pca-1;`,i' - 3.7- 6 I n«a i' o I s lr0r-i_ P;Io ro po scu' f r,K PP(ts Q / i)it- er__ pi-to1-4S 1 seG rO - Vl2W1A-T7 s« -_ c 0 . a- eel 2.I sD ' P oposeo! Fro 4+,Y,y 1 Moor-, P; y t„ A A I 31 L Tiro pos c -Y I--- L.-- vo pose,.!_SYppo.-T 73 o 4._t_.f--1A is .-_ P,be s (Selig rot.1} . I I E ;s.r-+ii-a-P..._Bu i 14 1.1 ea or i V if i I Ph— i I w I I 75 I i - 1 —5.)te___ tc....., =30 I r t r---1 o io— Ao=30IT OF R441A 40 o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 nmil rn CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR DELORES A. MEAD 04 co• Barbara Y. Sh .npoch, Mayor CITY CLERK 0, 9gT D P SEPrE April 10, 1950 Donald C. Dana 5219 Ripley~ Lane N. Renton, Wa 98055 Re: Recorded documents. Declaration of Restrictive Covenants Variance from Shoreline Master Proor3.:9, Dear Sir: Enclosed please find your copy of the document (s) recorded with King County Records and on file with the City Clerk's Office of Renton. - Very truly yours, CITYy OF RENTON oCY//t'ted, Q. y//, Delores A. Mead 1,1-r City Clerk DAM/db Enc ( 1) I File No. V-006-80 Donald Dana DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 1 WHEREAS, Donald C. Dana and his wife Patricia A. Dana are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, J described as follows: See attached legal description) J ' WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to c•use, present and future, of the property;. NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and approve restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: RESTRICTION OF USE The operation of the proposed dock shall be limited to entirely recreational purposes Ion a non-commercial basis. c DURATION 0 These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion. of the Covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further 2 8 ao documentation. Grp ID; a Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by' o 200 either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are n p adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. i z roe MN. 1 . 5'11011J3i3 CH338 Donald C. Dana 66; rip 4'' D{ iii e h c ti.L It (.(. ram! r Patricia A. Dana JU .0 i. U.:(13 1: STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING• On this • • day of •19 ; , before me personally appeared Donald C. Dana and Patricia A. Dana, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. r ,. :`II J,. ar Notary Public in and for the State r.o ii iir t hY+y:.• :. of Washington, residing in ; • ,. UNlCIPAI, IlL) ,, N, WASH. 9L•955 row " 227UI1 031 its 003 Y.... t IINNt •NE • vet .29. ?* 24 .MS 01 LOT 33-3Ii-IS LOCK C NILLMANS LK WN GARDEN Of EOEN 1134-.1 "SN LDS- GDJ P011 • 33 1 LH -LDS -CDJ SLY LW CS N :9-31-C7 I+112. 01 fT ,TN N 1$ DEG 41 mot 39 SEC M :to FT FR PIT 1-7 fT NLY Of Ii COA Of 3t. I P.02 .0, 3G• t SN -LO-S t J $:LY of LII.IrN:, N19DEG31 .11IN .Ol. SEC M 131.. 42 fT TN-N 11 DE5 41 IIN• 39 SIC N 221 IT 'FR PT 19 fT SLY Of SE C'OQ.-01 34 7 .4/ - - f r C. O, ,..2 i K:31::.)Ysl'R%cr'i 1 l l i MK . _t.. . 1—"1-__-17—'71"— 7t 7S0J T 2151, 03/1s/73 10/i1/t?1LY5291 •it':c.4i: -15000 T 2151« 01/01/73 100xvALUELAM.73 15500 I 21S1,` 12/07/7• REVALUED7553100T •2151 05/31/75 REVALUED t 71500 T 2151 011/10/75 aEvALUED. . 77t7 101300 1 21-51. 04/15/77 REVALUED t . I i LAND DATA IUILDI'NG DATA ZONE ACTUAL RES SEWER AVAILAILE YES USE TYPE SINGLE R 1n,1:T C Z 15^a FlR:,PtnC S174GLE x:;c'HIGHEST I LEST YES STORM SEWER NO ; USE FINIS:''0 AatA lyC; ri:ATI-alC:'PEUNITSITEUNOGINOUTILITIESNOUNITS1L•NYLIGNT YES " fv,;E-ST,15 1H6 WG<OM VALUE 412O0 WATER SYSTEM M-GIST YEAR SUILT 1975 £*TEatGk cRgx NOki - AJJ OUTLETS 1 {WATER SUPPLY STAN ENTERIOR STOKE NOaiZ PORCHESWATERFRONTLAKEEFFECTIVEYEAR19754nTNSFULL2CPEN 130LOT1110TH75DO( . SUIT - GOOD OATHS 3/o 1 • CiCtc oIrWIDTHUSERILE ,1OOv TIDELANDS GRADE 111.O9•001 GRTNS 1/2 14oNE DICE 1'lLOTDEPTH . • • 170 VIEW DEPTH. USEAILE 12 LAKE OTHER I POOL AREA OkiSTREETACCESS • :-STAN CITY EXCEL STORIES I. 0 TIi9 SINGLE I TREY NO GOOD : TOTAL Room 1 'DUILT-IMS 4 CURES • GUTTERS. NO U1 I L.I ZAT I ON DINING YES ADEQUATE cum GO•D STAN FAMILY-DEN-REC 1 GSnT. CnR- AREA . NO1,iSTREETSUPrACEASANALT--RE-STR-I"C.TIONS STAN . 1E-DR0.OMS 11- ATT.•G1__APE-A 77O--COn.(-RETE__R _-aTRAFFIC.— LIGHT ExT. NUISANCES STAN .OET. GAL. Ap(A NONE ASPKwLT AREA 29.5.0 ,PERM. 'EMU ,NO FIRST FLOOR AREA ,152001SOLESENCE • •I 1•. `-.T • . ,i' _ s CAPPOIT -ratA NOIGE 1 UNFIN. FULL STY NONE Pr2KI>~, STALLS 2' y;`{ -, - r+EATCO r.7E:30 0 C VO Jig i I.N I SNf 0 ATT I( I HEAT SCU7Ct GS AREA NONE c T_. SYSTO Alit 111 Iwtl:: t;7T. r rorm File No. V-006-80 onald Dana DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Donald C. Dana and his wife Patricia A. Dana are the owners of the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: See attached legal description) WHEREAS, the owners of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and approve restrictions and covenants running with the.land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: RESTRICTION OF USE The operation of the proposed dock shall be limited to entirely recreational purposes on a non-commercial basis. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the 1 Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity of further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys° fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. Donald C. Dana / l Ci c r-a 6_ CjL`" ` Patricia A. Dana STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this RkSF day of NeA-4, 19 bJ , before me personally appeared Donald C. Dana and Patricia A. Dana, the persons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. 1 p Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing•in\O-Q4 C,r f, 1• `• 7,• • JJ J v •su+s.- u. J 11617'g 11 1\T "L I NUR IN t, 9i,Ji1 400hei ii0441/ C C i'04 VC 3:0 J Iwir row •22744 MU 031 1s 003 c•.:,I 1 ca tI/4 Kt NE NC :29 MI 24 RRi OS uwt N$a1.taS LOT 33-34-35. 1l.00K- C HILL.MANS LK NN :GARDEN .Of COIN I S3I I SN LDS ADJ FOR 114 SH LDS GDJ StY La cm: a .:7- 1-C? Nf12. 01 FT .TH Nit DEG o1 FIN OnSECW .240 FT FR /T 17 fT nos NS O OF Sr 6 RC3 07 .15 ,1 SN LOS '14)J ilY GF LN Rios; *19 DEG 31 .nIN 09,. SEC W 111.. 42 fT TN N RI DEG 41 MIN 31"SEC It 221' FT-FR FT 19 FT Sly .Of sE Cog' OF A 4%. .,./.. - • '•: : ;• c•-••.=• • -• . . 4. it le . w'AI i:i rl'.IUU 1 K4r-fit I ` •.-om. ' ~_ r:,. • - . 760J T 2151 03/16/73 10/1 1/7111~59529"1GG03 .4iC7515000T215101/01/7.3 100kVALUELAi1 737616500T215E12/07/74 REVALUED •76 63300 T 2151 05/31/7S77 REVALUED • - 78600 T 2151 04/10/76 ' AEvALUED71 • ' - 101300 T 2151 04/16/77 REVALUED . i 1 l ' LAND DATA BUILDING DATA ZONE ACTUAL RES SEWER AVAILA1LE ' :YES uSE TYPE SINGLE:^BA;Ert,t:T Cohn 1600 F IREPLCCE 'SI N?aLE OWHIGHEST .I REST YES STORn SEWER NO uSE FIIIIS:"D Ad EA 1500. eI1.1LTI-1tc',";R 2s. ---''''''-- .A UNIT •:. SITE UNOGRNO UTILITIES No UNITS I DAYLIGHT YES F r.E-STa=ADIT4 ootiiVALUE-' 41200 WATER SYSTEM . • .. .W-DIST YEAR IUIL1 - 1975 ExTERIGR EsIty NONE AZD OUTLETS 1WATERSU11LY ` -. STAN ExTCQ to" STotkF Nowt:. Poi/EKES LOT WIDTH 75 WATERFRONT • LAKE Ef,FECTIVE YEAR 197i :0ATHS Full 2 OPEN ISO .jDOCKSUIT, GOOD BATHS .3/4 I • -CCCK ItoWIDTHUSEAILE , : '• "100x TIDLLANOS= : GRADE 111.01'00k BATHS 1/2 NONE DECK i•0LOTDEPTH170VIEW DErtN USEABLE ,' TNK-SNX-LOUND 1 IDOL AREA WON(92 LAKE . •:'. EXCEL STORIES 1. 0 :OTHER .SINGLE f-STREET' ACCESS . ;; :: STAN CITY : - •. GOOD TOTAL ROOnS 3 BUILT-INNS xALLEY :•;' - DINING YES ADEQUATE GARAGE - " .:GOODCURIS-$-GUT-T-E.R--. --NO-- Ut 1L-1-2AT I-ON ' . -- STAN ---=f-AI-I I t-DEN-RLC ' .--1- 9SnT. G;;R---Ad{-A NQI.E_. STREET .SURFACE- -ASPHALT RESTRICTIONS -. STAN " • 1EDROOMS ATT. GA2'. ma 770 CONCRETE 'AnA 1033 I' •TRAFFIC. '- _.'_'....:.= : -LIGHT EXT. NUISANCES • STAN • OCT. GAR. " AKEA NONE ASPHALT AREA 2750i_ PERM. REVIEW • NO - FIRST FLOOR AREA 11520OISOLESENCE CA1tro1T rrEA NONEs:--_,€:.;` r; - 1r;:' UNFIN. FULL STY NONE PARKIt G STALLS 2JaS,1. .is•“Zi.;,. -. • NEgTfO AREA 30-s0• r. FINISHED ATTIC HEAT AREA E SOURCE AIR iNONEHEATSYSTE1iF. AIR I,Y:Lu RT•, Aar." OF !RA, ó ° THE. CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9 O FRED J. KAIIFMAN. 235 -2593 0, 9gr D SEPW° P March 14, 1'80 Mr., Donald Dana 5219 Ripley Lane D. Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. V-006--80; Donald Dana Request for Shoreline Variance. Dear Mr. Dana: This is to notify you that the above referenced request,• which was approved subject to restrictive covenants as noted on the, Examiner's report of . February 28, 1980, has not been appealed within the time periods established by ordinance. Please 'call the Office of the Hearing Examiner at your earliest convenience in order that we may obtain ownership information tojdraw up the required restrictive covenants. Upon execution of the covenants, this application will be considered final and will be submitted to! the City Clerk for permanent filing. I Sincerely, . Fred J. Kaufman'1 Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk I AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 28th day of . February 19 80 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this a day of rAtka11 . 19 Q,a . LV(A kw Notary Public in and for the State.., of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Donald Dana; V-006-80 The minuted contain a tia t o6 the pa.' ti.ea necotd) i February 28, 1980 I OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: r Donald Dana FILE NO. V-006-80 LOCATION: 5219 Ripley Lane North SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a variance from the city's Shoreline Master Program to permit construction of a floating dock 180 feet in length, 80 feet in excess of the allowable 100 feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. I Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval with restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on February 14, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on February 19, 1980 at 9:30 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 1 Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Cross Section of Proposed Dock Mr. Blaylock noted that the only alternative to extension of pier length would be to dredge the area which would create greater impact and is specifically prohibited in provisions of the Shoreline Master Program. He corrected Section L.5 of Exhibit #1 which refers to Section 7.12.03 (C) (1) (6) of the Shoreline Master Program and should be revised to reflect the designation (b) instead of (6) . Mr. Blaylock advised that specific soundings or measurements should be submitted to substantiate information reflected in Exhibit #3. He also added a recommendation to require that the substantial development permit when issued would specifically require that all other necessary state and federal permits be obtained for the site. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Richard Seaborn Legal Agent for Donald Dana P.O. Box 145 Mercer Island, WA 98040 Mr. Seaborn ;submitted an aerial photograph, 1"-200' scale, to illustrate the conformity of the proposal to existing piers in the general vicinity, and show the existing shallow water shelf which extends beyond 200 feet from shore. Referencing departmental recommendation M.1 of Exhibit #1 which requires submission of data to substantiate the depth of the water as depicted on the cross section, Exhibit #3, Mr. Seaborn requested clarification of the intent of the requirement. Mr. Blaylock advised that soundings could be provided by a licensed engineer or hydrologist to aid the department in determining Ithe appropriate dock length. Mr. Seaborn indicated that other jurisdictions had previously allowed a staff member to accompany him by boat to view subject sites and witness sounding procedures. The Examiner stated that submission of soundings should have been accomplished prior to the public hearing to enable the Planning Department to arrive at aispecific conclusion regarding the proposal. He indicated his preference to continue the public hearing to allow submission of required data. He also noted that the Building Division had submitted comments stating the opinion that adequate water depth exists at 100 feet from shore to accommodate a pleasure craft. Mr. Seaborn objected to 006-80 Page Two continuation of the hearing, citing many delays incurred by the applicant in processing the application through the Planning Department, and his unawareness of the required submission until receipt of the Planning Department report in the mail. The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested testimony by Building Division staff. Responding was: Ron Nelson, Building Supervisor Public Works Department Mr. Nelson expressed concern regarding establishment of dock length without knowledge of water depths in the vicinity of the proposed dock. He indicated willingness to review additional data upon submission and provide further recommendations from the Building Division. The Examiner advised that the public hearing would be continued not for the purpose of further testimony, but to allow the applicant additional time to provide documentation of certified soundings. He indicated that upon receipt of the information no later than 5:00 p.m. on Monday, February 25, 1980, he would proceed with review of the application and the report would be issued within 14 days from that date. The Examiner requested further testimony. Responding was: Donald Dana 5219 Ripley Lane N. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Dana inquired if the soundings could be taken by the Building Division or other city staff. Although the Examiner indicated that city departments could be contacted regarding such procedures, it was his opinion that staff support is not generally available to the private developer. Mr. Blaylock entered an additional exhibit into the record which was labeled as follows: Exhibit #4: Letter to Planning Department from Mr. & Mrs. John Parks, dated February 18, 1980, supporting approval of variance for dock length. The Examiner continued the public hearing to close of business, February 25, 1980, for the purpose of submission of further documentation. He also advised that an extension of time may be possible upon request. Since there were no further comments, the hearing regarding File No. V-006-80 was closed by the Examiner at 10:03 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters :the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a variance from the provision :of the Shoreline Master Program which limits structures built over the water to 100 feet in length. 2. The Planning Department report sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is entered as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 4.3.21.C. , as amended, the subject proposal has been determined exempt from the threshold determination by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4 . Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 6 . The subject property was annexed into the city in 1960 and the G-6000 (General; Single Family Residential; minimum lot size - 6,000 square feet) zoning was applied at that time. 7. The site is generally level sloping down to Lake Washington. The lake bottom continues this gentle slope dropping approximately five feet over 180 feet. 8. The lake bottom in this area is composed of mud which is the result of stream sedimentation. There is also debris along the lake bottom from the former logging operations which previously occupied the site. V-C -80 Page Three 9. The applicant proposes constructing a 180--foot pier in order to moor a boat in water deep enough to provide both safe passage and safe moorage. The applicant indicated that the pier would be 12 feet in width but without further variance, piers may not exceed eight feet in width. 10. There are numerous pilings in the lake extending out about two hundred feet into the lake. These pilings are from the former commercial operations which occupied the area in the past. 11. There are similar structures up to approximately 180 feet in length located north of the subject site which permit the owners of these northerly properties to moor boats in water of adequate depth. 12. The applicant has submitted data in the form of soundings which substantiate the cross-sections of Exhibit #3. CONCLUSIONS: 1. In order for an applicant to receive a variance from the requirements of the Shoreline Master Program of the City of Renton, the applicant must demonstrate that the following criteria have been met: a. That extraordinary conditions apply to the subject property and do not apply to other property in the same vicinity, and the imposition of the bulk standards, i.e. 100-foot pier length, will deny the applicant reasonable use of his property. b. The variance will preserve or permit a valuable property right possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity. c. The use permitted by the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the same vicinity. d. The variance will be in harmony with the general purpose of the Master Program. e. The public welfare will not be harmed and that the harm done to the area will not be greater than the harm done to the applicant (W.A.C. 173-14-150(3) ; Shoreline Master Program 8.02) . The applicant has demonstrated that the requested variance is warranted. 2. The topography of the lake bottom immediately off shore of the subject property creates a shallow bench which is unique to the area. This condition makes it difficult if not impossible for the applicant to safely moor a boat within the required 100 feet of shore. One hundred foot piers are generally sufficient in most areas of the lake to allow safe and useful moorage but in this case the applicant cannot use his lakefront property in a similar manner as other property owners in the vicinity use their properties because of the extreme shallow depth. 3. The presence of old pilings extending out about 200 feet into the lake in the area just south of the subject property and the shallow depth already limit navigation in the area. The 180-foot pier proposed by the applicant will not cause any harm to the general public and will not harm neighboring property. 4. The Master Program was established to preserve shorelines in the City of Renton and to also permit those uses of shorelines which are natural and consistent with waterfront property. The approval of the variance will permit the occupant of a single family home to make appropriate use of his waterfront and will not harm the general welfare nor inhibit navigation in the area. 5. Presently, the applicant cannot safely moor nor operate boats in the shallow area without encountering mud and debris. The general public also encounters these conditions if they travel within 180 feet of shore. Approval of the variance will not interfere nor conflict with public passage in the area. 6. The applicant has not applied for and is not granted a variance from the provisions establishing the maximum width of piers as eight feet. DECISION: The variance from the Renton Shoreline Master Program to construct a 180-foot pier is granted subject to: 1. The operation of the proposed pier for entirely recreational purposes on a non- commercial basis; and 006-80 Page Four 2. The execution of restrictive covenants so limiting the use. ORDERED THIS 28th day of February, 1980. 644\r--°"' Fred J. K fman Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of February, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Donald Dana, 5219 Ripley Lane N. , Renton, WA 98055 Richard Seaborn, P.O. Box 145, Mercer Island, WA 98040 TRANSMITTED THIS 28th day of February, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before March 13, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen 14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. BALLINGER and SMITH. INC. EL71E P- T rJ3§,\R.6 JE}1 ll'J -1L Consulting Engineers 901 Terminal Sales Buildi__ o SEATTLE, WA 98101 DATE t, re•h JOD NO. 206) 626^92 6 ATTENTION RE: TO H I bQf7 -`z- D la-op0 S r 1 Ema sue... —. 1. GENTLEMEN: I WE ARE SENDING YOU ,'f° ttached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: Shop drawings 0 Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specification. Copy of, letter 0 Change order 0 COPIES DATE NO.DESCRIPTION 1 , rt P 1= F LG- ' 7S 'v 0 _ LL3 t—14 9-.At ,C— Imp . ,1 ATI 0 I,A$ 4$ T:'' -" 4a.g..i''"-I t U. t 11 ld t bk ..5 T (G, ;-arose 9_NI 4,_W L THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit __.copies for approval For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution s requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints For review and comment 0 FOR BIDS DUE 19 — 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS RECEIVED - 6 -/ 7CITYOFREIN!TON L- Zz -FO . F 71980 AM PM 7131991EtIiit12E1 i2i3141516 COPY TO SIGNED: 9 FORM 240-3 nvz!LebIo from® Groton.Mom 01450 If enclosures,aro not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Mr. and Mrs. John F. Parks 5301 Ripley Lane North Renton, Washington 98055 February 18, 1980 Renton Planning Commission City of Renton Renton, Washington Attention: Dave Clements Gentlemen: As neighbors of Mr. Donald Dana at 5219 Ripley Lane North, and of Mr. Herb' Nissen at 5201 Ripley Lane North, we wish to go on record as being in support of their requests for variances in constructing docks exceeding one hundred feet in length as allowed by the Shoreline Master, Plan. This shoreline area of Lake Washington has an accumulation of silt that results in very shallow water depth close to the shoreline. We own property at 5227 Ripley Lane North, and reside at 5301 Ripley Lane North, so we are personally aware of silt and the shallow water depth problem caused by the silt . A dock of one hundred seventy to one hundred eighty feet is necessary in order to have enough water depth : for. boat moorage and in order to have a safe swimming area and other safe recreational uses of the waterfront . We support Mr. Nissen 's request for a one hundred s gYrty foot dock, and Mr. 'Dana's request for a one hundred foot dock. Sincerely, ygizze.44_, RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER FEB 1 31980 EXHIBIT NO. `/AM PM 71819,N11121 5.13415,6 ITEM N ®. o - RECEIVED t CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER FEB 1 91980 PLANNINGIING DEPARTMENT AM PM 718i9,10,11,1211 2,3,4,5,E PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 EXHIBIT I O. / APPLICANT : DONALD DANA ITEM NO. FILE NUMBER : V-006-80 wr:a A . SWTIMA11>81Y r. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The! applicant requests a Variance from the City ' s Shore- line Master Program to permit construction of a floating dock . (Section 7 . 12 . 03 (c) ( 1 ) City of Renton Shoreline Master Program) B . GENERALAIL INFORMATION:TIION: 1 . Owner of Record : DONALD DANA 2 . ; Applicant : DONALD DANA 3 . Location : Vicinity Map Attached) 5219 Ripley Lane North i 4.H Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept. 5 . ' Size of Property : 7952± square feet 6 . j Access :Via Ripley Lane North 7 . 1 Existing Zoning : G-6000 , General Classifi- cation District ; minimum lot size 6000 square feet . 8m Existing Zoning in the Area : G-6000 9 .! Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential 10 .; Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on February 6 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on February 8 , 1980 . C . 0HI15 TORV A1CKGMAIND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1823 dated April 21 , 1960 , at which time the present zoning classification was applied . D . PHYSICAL I:+A1CK(GDU WIND: I. Topography : The site of the dock is basically level sloping gently to the west . The lake bottom drops approximately 5 feet in 180 feet , according to the cross section submitted in the application . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DONALD DANA , V-006-80 FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 PAGE TWO 2 . Soils :, The houses rests on Indianola loamy fine sand, 0-4% slopes' ( InA) . Permeability is rapid , runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight . This soil is used for timber . The thick layer of mud lies adjacent to the shoreline under the water . This is a result of sedimentation from and intermittent stream. 3 . Vegetation : The mud does provide a sufficient base for vegetation to attach to . Free floating vegetation is found in the water . 4 . Wildlife : The mud provides some habitat for micro- organisms . 5 '. Water : Not applicable . 6 . Land Use : Single family residence . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are principally single family residential in nature . The area was used in the past for logging operations . There are numerous pilings south of the Nissen residence . F . plJ LL1LC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main and an 8" sewer main run north-south on Ripley Lane . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #240 operates along 1-405 within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject site . 4. Schools : Hazelwood Elementary School is . approximately 1/3 of a mile to the east . McKnight Junior High School is 1-3/4 miles to the southeast. The high school students would probably attend Hazen Senior High School approximately 2-1/2 miles to the south- east . 5 . Recreation : Recreation is provided by Lake Washington . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF TTIHI[E ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 , "G" General Classification District . H . A1fPPIL3ICA MLIE SECTIONS OF TTIHIE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY/STATETT/ATE DOCUMENTS:NTS: 4 . R .C .W. 90 .58 . 20 Shorelines Management Act of 1971 . 2 . W .A .C . 173-14-150; Review Criteria for Variance Permits . 3 . City of Renton Shoreline Mater Program , Section 7 .12 (Docks and Piers ) , Section 8 .02 (Variances) . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1 . Natural Systems : Construction of the pier will disturb the water and aquatic life in the vicinity . However , through proper development controls "and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DONALD DANA , V-006-80 FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 PAGE THREE 2 . Population/Employment : Minor . 3 . Schools : Minor . 4 . Social : Minor . 5 . Traffic : Minor . J . ENVlItRQD IMEN1T(AJL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , the proposal is exempt from the determination of environmental significance..; K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . ' City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 . , City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . L . EP lA 1f lI 1G DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The applicant is requesting a variance from the Shoreline Master Program which allows a maximum. dock length of 100 ° . The applicant proposes to construct a dock of 180 ' in length . 2 The site involved is at the mouth of an old stream bed that presently has some intermittent flow. The lake bottom is a shallow shelf consisting of mud . The water depth varied from 2 to 7 feet at approximately 180 ° feet fromthe existing shoreline . The mud lake bottom along with the shallow depth of the water causes a major problem to the applicant in using a motor boat . The mud sucks up into the engine . The applicant is restoring an old tug boat , The Little David , which is presently grounded on the mud . 3 . The Shorelines Management Act governs development on the shoreline . The proposed pier will cost more than the allowed $2500 and a substantial development permit has been applied for . The Revised Code of Washington and the Washington Administrative Code require that specific criteria established under WAC 173-14-150 be applied . The variance is not granted by the City of Renton , the variance is granted by the State of Washington . The City of Renton makes a recommendation to the state and the state must concur in that recommendation for the variance to become valid . The variance criteria differs whether the development is in the water or on the upland portion from a shoreline . The following analysis addresses each of the six criteria to be reviewed by the state : a. "That strict application of the bulk , dimensional or performance standards as set forth in the applicable master program precludes a reasonable permitted use of the property. " The physical limitations of the shelf extending from the residence precludes the use of a standard dock less than 100 ° in length . A 100 ° dock PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING ; DONALD DANA , V-006-80 FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 PAGE FOUR would allow the motor boat' to sit in approxi- mately 4 ' of water thus sucking up the mud from the bottom of the lake . This• would cause unreasonable damage to the boat and to the property owner . The Shoreline Master Program•, Section':7 . 12 .03 (C) ( 1) (a) suggests that 8 feet of water depth is necessary for residential docks . In addition , the Army Corps of Engineers varies the level of Lake Washington for flood control . - The lake level fluctuates approximately 2 feet . In the winter- time it is lower , and in the summertime it is higher . b . "That the hardship described in WAC• 173-14--150 3 ) (A) above is specifically related to the property , and is a result of a unique condition such as irregular. lot shape , size, or natural features and the application of the Master Program and not , for. example , from deed restrictions or the applicant ' s own action . " The physical limitation is a result of the mud bottom of the lake and a very shallow shelf extending from the property . This shelf extends approximately 180-200 feet from the existing shoreline . In the past , this area was used for a log storage area and the bottom of the lake has added debris from logs . The applicant is • not responsible for the natural feature of the lake bottom . c . "That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will . not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or to the shoreline environment designation . " The property owner to the south has 'requested a similar pier (see File No . V-005-80) . The property immediately adjacent to the north of the subject site presently has a pier which is approximately 170 ° long . :;The natural underwater shelf. continues to narrow as it goes to the north and approximately 3 more residences to the north the docks can be of standard size . The area to the south has been used in the past for a log storage facility and substantial pilings and piers were constructed to at least 200 ' from the shoreline . Therefore , the design of the project appears to be compatible with the other established and permitted activities in the area and it will not cause an adverse effect to the adjacent properties . d . "That the request for the variance will not constitute a grant of special priviledge not enjoyed by the other property owners in the area and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. " The length of the dock at 180 ' will be minimum necessary to allow the functional use of the moorage site for a motor. boat . It will not be a special privilege in that there are other examples of existing docks which are in the approximate neighborhood of 160-180 feet in length . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC f4EARING : DONALD DANA , V-006-80 FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 PAGE FIVE e , "That the public rights of navigation and use of the shoreline will not be adversely affected by the granting of the variance . " The numerous pilings to the south already provide a blockage of navigation within 200 ' of the shoreline . The existing single family residential dock to the north provides another blockage. Therefore the area inbetween will not appear to infringe upon that public right , it would be continuation of .the existing patterns established along the shoreline at this time . f . "That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental affect . " The public use of the shoreline has been eliminated by previous subdivision of the shoreline in this area. The use of the water surface itself has been limited by previous development and by the fact that the area is very shallow (less than 7 ' ) . It would appear that the public interest is not going to be substantially impacted in a negative manner by the proposed development of the site . 4. I The length of the dock at 180 ' appears to provide more than enough length to allow the docking of more than one boat . The dock should be used exclusively by the property owner for his use . It should not be used on a commercial basis for other individuals . Moorage space is at a premium throughout the Pacific Northwest and approving a dock which could allow more than personal use should be discouraged . 5 . Section 7 . 12 . 03 (C ) (1 ) (6) establishes the maximum dock width..at• 8 feet . The proposal shows a 12-foot width . Therefore the plans will have to be modified or a variance requested . 6 . The applicant has not submitted justification to substantiate the variance request . The contractor alludes to accurate soundings ; however , nothing was provided to the Planning Department . A cross section of the lake bottom and pier were submitted without supporting data . - MM . DEIPARTMIE IT L II IECOMME Dll TIUN S: Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the variance request , File No . V-006-80 be approved with the following conditions : 1 . Submission of data to substantiate the depth of the water as depicted on the cross section . 2 .'. Narrowing of the dock to 8 feet from 12 • feet . 3 . The filing of restrictive covenants that would preclude the use of the pier for any commercial purposes . II// I 1\ fI 5# 4% \\ 11 j .•,e:^J(1J f i(1 1'1 '1 1 .II `t-• i/r` a l„ i r.; T I I` e /' 7 1 i lil: . r 7 .//:;,/ I I' `" er ''i/ l . 1 I yl.Y ' Y ,!<. n jw..d IM1.. I31 IS'J I il 0", ' „. 14,//. 1) 1 I ti J\ :2: 17'• i C. t/ , i ` I ? 0zI 1t,7 t / 7;y14A 1, •_•••_. __•••••••••_____. . • r,,,,..;, i• IY / A r[ ID9 i5 2 c. ..• csfs i r 2f1 Q I. i a I 0,% y JCT ®L ---- - A ee rzl." Lxl 0..__l r : H i.e .L I( i i 6r /., `` 1Lfr IW9 I• 11H1 'r I I.._._l I• I ifyi/; I I I I,r 1 r I 3 li ! Y 4 I I ig ./ III I I c,:f,•",,ll/ "'+.,',:.., I fl uI{ cI• i • . 4 7.- 7/ I1/ . n" •,,/}I II 1 , 4 I ' S.. 1 t i y F 1f t - fh I 1- 1. - s;: e y,- c i ru I'1ti :' r--.,..-.es.•...,..•r< , 1-- 11A 11' 1 e';Y" fie ----ICI— ._-----10, ---_ 'e.. .- li I!III l F i ` i I I ` l' I 1 I DONALD DANA 1. v-006-80 1 1 t I APPLICANT DON p DANA TOTAL AREA + 7952 sq feet PRINCIPAL ACCESS . Via Ripley Lane North 1 G-'6000 EXISTING ZONING Single famil residence EXISTING USE g y t Single family residence dockPROPOSEDUSE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential COMMENTS l' t f 1 z I i y.,.... I i lyre. o 07' .. 01 .C; L__.2..~._1___— j P- I i i S Z. d E9 f ! V7 - I 5 ip./:,/ / 1: r` 1.• odd1, /.> ocroir -` I j LC Ste, ;.,.moo ,j470rod0.. 7, 7 Z I----)1 1t,\''; r_ t dt:r r .roe r j..c(.ud - ,,.i..- 5>1 CH,aoa sadoa 1 i IA r P'-- it Z- IIP j7 c.,,.I-p y Sota- ,- S d0 v T j yl f e , 4 „1 •` 0 -- — 9 4..,..,„, -)., 1 95a3b t4 °-f ` e0 Iv I p, -7 bra/ Clr J _• __ _ r 1 i.---,:•-',,:-7:i.s,•:..--•:•,-.,..-;:2.:....,••• .:1 1 •. . , 0,•,,•:,„:.;,: ,i.3.';',:,-',..,—..:',,...''••- '• I• lee_ r,:,.. . 4‘1-'--- 1 1. I 1. liA,••4 L.'s C_p E.loW,fi?u 4„ fj ,,...,,,,,_____ _ .;., . . --- • .,_________________-____,-LE----7- . -----,,.,7 ,1--2 .. . e. 1 i I I i i.., . 09 'fr.- li li IIcr-'• 4 v4E tj E .) 1 d.-: g a 7 g 67.) ,,,,k_ i. j DONALD DANA ' SHORELINES VARIANCE FILE NUMBER V-006-80 i t i 1. - - ..._. _. ... nton Planning Departmen u , DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • Applications /,f/-® ?,.+ ci ' " , s e 9 'elf tea-7( 1, Applicanto ra.a a TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :. c4//7 Police Department A. R, Co MEETING j'?//744T Public Works Department Engineering Division t:. F`; I Traffic Engineering j .;l ;i jj_i) `> Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department COf'1 ENTSS O SUGGESTIONS RAG AR DIG THIS AP ICO SHOULDO PROVIDEDiNWRITINGFORTALIC1IOVEVIWCONFERENCERC) O 3:. ILD ON/7 $? _ Al 9:00 AM IN THE TEl FLOOR CONFERENCECEUE. IF YOUR DEPARTMEN I_VISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ' ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC) PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING ,DEPARTMENTBY . : U0 PM ON L// REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Approved Approved with conditions . Not Approved 1 J n tv_..-.+..r-cti.i <-,—_3 C_ -a.e—X.—t^--.- ia,.„ 1^+- /`/r'-„/„e_. Signature b t Director or Autfor•ized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved . Approved with conditions Not 'Approved i gnature it f Di ,^ector er Atitiloi i zed Representative ^_____ Date I 7/Vr3 Renton Planning Department' DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : 4/< F 1 {f>;— en)IC Sitov clime diP1 C. 61Leoctior p l4,?,0 -, ,rW, • t` lt-`•r Wiz... Appl icanto R a _ rt e. r" TO :_ Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Pql ice Department AO R. Cp MEETING_._&_ Public Works Department Engineering Division • Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department IN 1 S SUGGESTIONSTHISRIIINGP,F1APPLICATION REGARDING CO1FEf ENCEoC(A ) SHOULD BE. IE . PROVIDED' Al 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE . FR IF YOUR DEPARTMENTThIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ' ABLE . TO • ATTENDTHE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE I LANN I NG :DE PARTMENT_ BY 5:00 PM ON 6/o D REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVI5IONo A Approved Approved with conditions Not APproved a I\I c GT v \--1- e 31.i c-1 E 04e_r S i g tore of- Director or AuthorizedzedRepresentative 7' hr " CJ n a REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISl"ONci--/V Approved Approved with conditions Not A0p,roved s C cc. ' d ) /_%c l` N f71/ a .` / 6 I LI( y- (C''O ( ' G C /f("C 0 bl f'i_'. // 1 Si nz ure of `1irecto1' or Authorized Representative 1 y 11 U t.u. _ ., . Li 1 1 C\. b V 1 ... .... •..... . . s. .. .. N. ./ti.'I r c::.::--.'-__—_==•__-___-..:- _`--=L... .."=^, a' 1 rcunton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET A p p 1 i c a t i rz 2A_ 1 - a ` b ppy dezafro, . i alb Ps .?v /® LI(?80-c43F '13 Applicant : q. , i/ TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :.c F Police Department Ao R. Co MEETING 6V/ 7:: Public Works Department Engineering Division I s4TrafficEngineeringf;I T Building Division 1 I\ 1s p 'Utilities Engineering F= C3 413n 0 p e Department 4 .. " G $`F- Ofl ENTS1 'OR S 1GG Sl ONS R-CAR)ING iN J9ZI 4PJG 'F(I l t w E'LIC IIO N RE_VT L SCU1?'CATZOP SIIOEJrD 3 - PROVIDEDERFNCE (ARC) 1O 3F HELD ON 1017_ L- '`'-- _—__ Al 9:00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCER !'',. It- OUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ABLE TOATTENDTHEARC, PL ..ASE. PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING ,DEPARTMENTBYD:00 PM ON =ge _ __ f EVILIJIIJGEPARTI`1ENT/DIVISXONe Approvid Fpproved Frith conditions, Not Approved Hu sr W Ji - r ' I,e`= 6 l-e-4 'id,.s.i ems- io 4- ,vra oi. 6',f 72,,,,r /' a', .,0/s „,,,,,,sam.1° p//,. '0 cae;' J E /eirtzleiieo Ca,c ,V. I ' 96\---1(- 1---.1)(1 L___,./ 7 e/e; ./.-6.°St mature -of Direc or or Au Vorized Representative I Date REVIEWING 11 EPARTMENT,/DIVISION ° V Approved X Approved with conditions Not App,roveri F/e 7-4:„..... „:_n 1.,1 -. .,.L- - c-,- 74._ Veivcc-m..... — 5V-4_ Signature of Director or Authorized Re )resent:at-i e i ate Appendix F UNIFORM FIRE CODE o EDITION Appendix F Containers v.Ith tight-fcttin, or self-closi;:* :ds dial! he pro- iry r i,,1 f,r the temporary storage of combustible tr.:h or rubbish- sl.1APPENDIXt111electricalequipmentinstalledandusedmustbeinaccord- ig iu IARINAS I e with the Electrical Code as it applies to wet, damp and hazardous t Such facilities shall conform to the requirements set forth in the r lions, It Fire Code and NFPA Standard No. 303 except as herein provided. FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT Li 1" .GENERAL=- - _ All piers, wharves, floats with facilities for mooring or servicing five rIf or more vessels, and marine service stations shall be equipped with fire i Plans for marina fire protection faciL'ties shall be approved by the k protection as follows: 1 Fire Chief or authority having jurisdiction prior to installation. The a) Allportions equipment floats exce din 250 feet in distance from fire completed work shall be subject to final inspection and approval after g installation. apparatus access and marine service stations shall be provided with an approved wet standpipe system, installed in conformity with applicable 2. DEFINITIONS standards set forth in NFPA Standard No. 14 and Article 13 of this a) FLOAT shall mean any floating structure normally used as a - _ Code. t 1441pointoftransferforpassengersandgoodsand/or for mooring pur- 1. Hose stations shall be so spaced as to provide protection to anyposes, portion of floats or floating vessel, Hoses shall be mounted on a g b) MARINA shall mean a portion of the ocean or inland water ` `. reel or rack and enclosed within an approved cabinet. Hose sta- either naturally or artificially protected for the mooring, servicing or tions shall be labeled "FIRE HOSE — EMERGENCY USE ONLY", All e ui ment shall meet the a roval of the Chief. fT safety of vessels, and shall include artificially protected works; the q P pp public or private lands ashore; structures or facilities provided within _ 2. At the shore end, the waterline shall be equipped with a single kf' I the enclosed body of water and ashore for the mooring or servicing of 2 mch fire department connection. I vessels or the servicing of their crews or passengers. 3> Waterlines shall normally be dry where area is subject to freez- l t I=• •- c) PIER shall mean a structure built over the water and supported ing temperatures. i 4. by landing p p p F': l b) Piers and wharves shall be provided wi±b nre apparatus accesspillarsorpiles: used as a lace, leasure avillion, etc, s, d) VESSEL shall mean every description of water craft, other s::= : roads and water supply systems with on-site fire hydrants as may be than seaplane on the water, used or capable of being used as a means ± required by the Chief. Such roads and water systems shall conform to of transportation. Article 13. e) WHARF shall mean a structure or bulk head constructed of =: .= 5. PORTABLE FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT- wood, stone, concrete, etc., built at the shore of a harbor, Iake or river w.= P;T 7 for vessels to lie alongside of, and piers or floats to be anchored to. a) One fire extinguisher, A; 20 B:C rating minimum, shall be 1 provided in each hose station required. 3. FIRE PREVENTION REGULATIONS I b) The Chief shall designate the-type and number of all other fire a) Persons having charge or control over any structure, including =`=ti^'' appliances to be installed and maintained in each marina. i pier or wharf, shall not allow the deposit or permit the accumulation of ^'> " combustible debris or rubbish on land beneath such structure, pier or 6- TRANSMISSION OF ALARMS 35 wharf. Means shall be available for the immediate notification of the Fire u b) No person shall use any open flame device for maintenance or -- *:;,t Department. fit r repair on any vessel, float, pier or wharf without a permit s . 7. MAINTENANCE OF ACCESS c) No person shall use any portable barbecue, brayer or cooking _may`b;' device on any vessel, float, pier, or wharf without a permit. Access shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Article d) Any open flame device used for lighting or decoration on the t_", 13, exterior of any vessel, float, pier or wharf must be approved by the `-.x 8> MARINE SERVICE STATIONS rChief. e) Any spills of flammable or combustible liquids at or upon the ."• ;; Marine service stations shall conform to Article 15. F4,c water shall be reported immediately to the Fire Deparat,ent or Juris- uJ-i, NI gi dictional authorities. p„ 281 lz, 140 N. eKT,S--`.. w_ -.., YY•+-.,..., i--l..-. .----.-.:"-_._. 4.. r.-. .-?..- r _ -. ^_ n . . v.r=_ .._ " - ' f _ 3:4 ` em^r •; c-:•< a^f_ s t:= ' f_-s a c_ . . t y.r... . v ...,may. .i 4 - " ""k' ^ Iss- sue. _ -r7 X(+ -. 4.n s c u .- -,,.. .., _ ls...-..._ S _`':' - r- - Y.. " .1 ' h J. 1s wM ". rr - 0• i; - . 7 , x: - v.s a-k=,. ' _-:. nes>: 7.5 .. +.l = d PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING 1 FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 APPLICANT : DONALD DANA FILE NUMBER : V-006-80 A. SUMMARY Y a. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests a Variance from the City ' s Shore- line' Master Program to permit construction of a floating dock . (Section 7 . 12 . 03 (c) (1 ) City of Renton Shoreline Master Program) B . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . ', : Owner of Record : DONALD DANA 2 . Applicant :, DONALD DANA 3 . i, , Location : Vicinity Map Attached) 5219 Ripley Lane North 4. , , Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . 5 .,j, Size of Property : 7952± square feet 6 .. Access :Via Ripley Lane North Existing Zoning : G-6000 , General Classifi- cation District ; , minimum lot size 6000 square feet . 8 . '' Existing Zoning in the Area : G-6000 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential l00 '., Notification : The applicant was • notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on February 6 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on February 8 , 1980 . C . Ifil]IST(OU31YAACff`GRQDllDNfD: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance 1823 dated April .21 , 1960, at which time the present zoning classification was applied . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . ' Topography : The site of the dock is basically level sloping gently to the west . The lake bottom drops approximately 5 feet in 180 feet , according to the cross section submitted in the application . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DONALD DANA , V-006-80 FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 PAGE TWO 2 . Soils : The houses rests on Indianola loamy fine sand , 0-4% slopes ( InA) . Permeability is rapid , runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight . This soil is used for timber . The thick layer of mud lies adjacent to the shoreline under the water . This is a result of sedimentation from uhd intermittent stream . 3'. Vegetation : The mud does provide a sufficient base for vegetation to attach to . Free floating vegetation is found in the water . 4 . Wildlife : The mud provides some habitat for micro- organisms . 5 . Water : Not applicable . 6'. Land Use : Single family residence . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are principally single family residential in nature . The area was used in the past for logging operations . There are numerous pilings south of the Nissen residence . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main and an 8 " sewer main run north-south on Ripley Lane . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements . 3 . ' Transit : Metro Transit Route #240 operates along I-405 within 1/4 mile to the east of the subject site . 4. Schools : Hazelwood Elementary School is approximately 1/3 of a mile to the east . McKnight Junior High School is 1-3/4 miles to the southeast. The high school students would probably attend Hazen Senior High School approximately 2-1/2 miles to the south- east . 5 . Recreation : Recreation is provided by Lake Washington . G . %A\PPLI(CA MLIE SECTIONS OF TIHIIE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 , "G" General Classification District. H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE (C®MIPREHE IsIV'E ,rLA II OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY/STATE DOCUMENTS: 1 . R .C .W. 90 .58 . 20 Shorelines Management Act of 1971 . 2. W .A .C . 173-14-150 , Review Criteria for Variance Permits . 3 . City of Renton Shoreline Mater Program , Section 7 . 12 (Docks and Piers ) , Section 8 .02 (Variances ) . I . IMPACT ON IIHIIE NATURALRAIL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT: 1'. Natural Systems : Construction of the pier will disturb the water and aquatic life in the vicinity . However , through proper development cootrois and procedures , these impacts can be mitigated . PLANNING DEPARTMEI PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC 'HEARING : DONALD DANA , V-006-80 FEBRUARY, 19 , 1980 PAGE THREE 2 .; Population/Employment : Minor . 3. Schools : . Minor . 4 .' Social : Minor . 5 .! Traffic : Minor . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , the proposal is exempt from the determination of environmental significance .. : K . 'I;GIEN(CIE S/®E(PA1881TMIECNIITS CONTACTED : 1': City of Renton Building Division . 2;' City of Renton Engineering Division . 3'. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4 : City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton Fire Department . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 ; The applicant is requesting a variance from the Shoreline Master Program which allows a maximum. i dock length of 100 ° . The applicant proposes to construct a dock of 180 ° in length . 21 The site involved is at the mouth .of an old stream bed that presently has some intermittent flow. The lake bottom is a shallow shelf consisting of I mud . The water depth varied from 2 to 7 feet at f. approximately 180 ' feet fromthe existing shoreline . The mud lake bottom along with the shallow depth of, the water causes a major. problem to the applicant in using a motor boat . The mud sucks up into the engine . The applicant is restoring an old tug boat , The Little David , which is presently grounded on the mud . 3,. ' The Shorelines Management Act governs development on the shoreline . The proposed pier will cost more than the allowed $2500 and a substantial development permit has been applied for . The Revised Code of Washington . and the Washington Administrative Code require that specific criteria established under WAC 173-14-150 be applied . The variance is not granted by the City of Renton , the variance is granted by the State of Washington . The City of Renton makes a recommendation to the state and the state must concur in that recommendation for the variance to become valid . The variance criteria differs whether the development is in the water or on the upland portion from a shoreline . The following analysis addresses each of the six criteria to be reviewed by the state : a. "That strict application of the bulk , dimensional or performance standards as set forth in the applicable master program precludes a reasonable permitted use of the property. " The physical limitations of the shelf extending from the residence precludes the use of a standard dock less than 100 ' in length. A 100 ' dock PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : DONALD DANA, V-006-80 FEBRUARY 19, 1980 PAGE FOUR would allow the motor boat' to sit in approxi- mately 4 ' of water thus sucking up the mud from the bottom of the lake ® This would cause unreasonable damage to the boat and to the property owner . The Shoreline Master Program•, Section: 7 . 12 ,03 (C) (1 ) (a) suggests that 8 feet of water depth is necessary for residential docks . In addition , the Army Corps of Engineers varies the level of Lake Washington for flood control . The lake level fluctuates approximately 2 feet . In the winter- time it 'is lower , and in the summertime it is higher . b , "That the hardship described in WAC 173-14-150 3 ) (A) above is specifically related to the property , and is a result of a unique condition such as irregular lot shape , size , or natural features and the application of the Master Program and not , for. example , from deed restrictions or the applicant ' s own action . " The physical limitation is a result of the mud bottom of the lake and a very shallow shelf extending from the property . This shelf extends approximately 180-200 feet from the existing shoreline . In the past , this area was used for H' a log storage area and the bottom of the lake has added debris from logs . The applicant is not responsible for the natural feature of the lake bottom . c . "That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or to the shoreline environment designation ," The property owner to the south has requested a similar pier (see File No . V-005-80 ) . The property immediately adjacent to the north of the subject site presently has a pier which is approximately 170 ' long . ;The natural underwater shelf continues to narrow as it goes to the north and approximately 3 more residences to the north the docks can be of standard size . The area to the south has been used in the past for a log storage facility and substantial pilings and piers were constructed to at least 200 ' from the shoreline . Therefore , the design of the project appears to be compatible with the other established and permitted activities in the area and it will-- not cause an adverse -effect to the adjacent properties .: d . "That the request for the variance will not constitute a grant of special priviledge not enjoyed by the other property owners in the area and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief, " The length of the dock at 180 ' will be minimum necessary to allow the functional use of the moorage site for a motor boat . It will not be a special privilege in that there are other examples of existing docks which are in the' approximate neighborhood of 160-180 feet in length . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : ' DONALD DANA , V-006-80 FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 PAGE FIVE e . "That the public rights of navigation and use of the shoreline will not be adversely affected by the granting of the variance , " The numerous pilings to the south already provide a blockage of navigation within 200 ' of the shoreline . The existing single family residential ii dock to the north provides another blockage . Therefore the area inbetween will not appear l to infringe upon that public right , it would be continuation of the existing patterns established along the shoreline at this time , f. "That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental affect . " The public use of the shoreline has been eliminated by previous subdivision of the shoreline in this area . The use of the water surface itself has been limited by previous development and by the fact that the area is very shallow (less than 7 ' ) . It would appear that the public .interest is not going to be substantially impacted in a negative manner by the proposed development of the site . 4 . The length of the dock at 180 ' appears to provide more than enough length to allow the docking of more than one boat . The dock should be used exclusively by the property owner for his use . It should not be used on a commercial basis for other individuals . Moorage space is at a premium throughout the Pacific Northwest and approving a dock which could allow more than personal use should be discouraged . 5 . Section 7 ,12 . 03 (C ) (1 ) (6 ) establishes the maximum dock width. at 8 feet . The proposal shows a 12-foot width. Therefore the plans will have to be modified or a variance requested . 1 6 . The applicant has not submitted justification to substantiate the variance request . The contractor alludes to accurate soundings ; however , nothing was provided to the Planning Department . A cross section of the lake bottom and pier were submitted without supporting data . - MM . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the variance request , File No . V-006-80 be approved with the following conditions : 1 . Submission of data to substantiate the depth of the water as depicted on the cross section , 2'. Narrowing of the dock to 8 feet from 12 feet . 3 . The filing of restrictive covenants that would preclude the use of the pier for any commercial purposes . k tl l .k1.1 i.i y\ I\ \ '"''' 1' 611: k; .,-.\ . -. ' ::---/J ; i 9 • ...m.„o,o, ,....,fi . --,12 t.,4;,. I. 1 11 i 1 I i 5 f.,.,../7 Jib a • r . C74:1/1\1) I .1: I- 1 '.<e, ,, ,,:,.5..,„,j i4. I31 13'3 ! PI i.1 If" ''''`Itki 's"*'....., ' ! 4- /i •„,„, 11411 2:4 ,..., z la t ;\ 134 4 IP' I i d/ 1/44% -'? t;' , i 54u•.."1..}•....•'''.' 1, r7,;""..17. 1!i.L.1 ,u;-,- - 2170 0 f.% ' ,//: 1 I 1 i f tv F n ). ..-2 Jv,,,ei , 7'. 1.....„,„.i.___._.. \._. 5.,.._......._i ilp f_ -- .-...--_-_- 0/i • 1, -- 17 -.7:q-.,711;p-.) ---- q 1-. •.-:-...:_--- 1 9; '1 '; LJi0t,a. 4/ ' • (" '---- 4r i • li,7•:-..•.:.r, -?",--;-t . .....1II ) 11 X1:11 t'?.,"" lv`z ".1 ..!'..14 i.:c.i„11,;:I. • .e? 7)...7e 11'1 7 /,1" 1 I. I /, 4 7"4'71/ I ' X '. i 11' - •-;n''-cT,1,2 4%,-Y,/ I 'A ,1.1,-TUMM 4 -.--•--......_ __1 ...L. I: r -i [ 1 i 1.:=1 e;-.3 1 ( ti/.// +,1;1, 7.1--i Ll'-::..., Zi4 ! .25\\'‘''t i 4. . 150 1.19 i , .." '''\Y "),i) L 1 4 .--.. • 4 i,,7ll 7, - 11.\sj/ /VI/ .' l 5, 1{1......,12111„.. tI i.1, ;tiei;/ 11 .;: /,;1 1 :. 1:: I I Pd1ieil , 4 . i..i./,i-7(--,:,//" 77,,s,'.. ,,,. '`••/,,/,,/ f 1b71)'. : 6....1 11;._..__._- t46..,._.•H..'.. 4--, ;`, \ • ,/ 1 1!' li 5 /..1 1-,,,,\ , i C't7..; 1:' j1 ' ' I 75 ; • ',/y-..; :: . . n; I r, 7104 1 i i'‘1 1 ' '2; ',4;'';i'e:__ 87 S - -''' ...,— I t - I ‘, ; k ' DONALD DANA V-006-80 q. APPLICANT DO_NALD__UANA TOTAL AREA + 7952 sq feet PRINCIPAL ACCESS Via Ripley Lane North EXISTING, ZONING G-6000 EXISTING USE Single family residence PROPOSED USE Single family residence dock 1 Single Family Residential 1 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN I 1 COMMENTS i i I i i i 1 1 F. r 1'_ D 1 1-5121111-(jii_R_ '.6).--/c..-y 1.- o , IV n Li ice_ 4) ,,,_,ii,,,,710. ,.„:, .... F., .... ....f . ._ _.... .._ _ 1,s,0 55 1 ) e:4 1 .-\: 3: ',_ i 4 o, _ ) e.pi o vi _ 1)? • De 14:-, . ...• 8 -T 3. ,I.c• II._0 -:-----.--->k---z--,-6--. ''->4" -;-: 7.7 1il 12s i . BE-7 -c3S-7-_ ,c.r,-,-ci .• 3.'%-, T 1 , . s I. _c..-„,x-.e. 6 ,1*- A . • •._ 1J ••7 p-,---i,sr-CD./ ") 1.1Dori.ti P;i45; 30 i , , k4e)c(-4-rv- _PI-01-11s c...._,_6,17,.......______/_.;:,..tz 1.1 L.____I 1.--.1 hiI -- ( ' ''-41 ,1 -- . 17.0=_••••••••;.: ."_•• .• t/i It ...-------T---41 •e..' r i,3-0 t • . F-1•••-c-p---,,,-_.,;,/ F.104.+:1'1 ' I--- 1 . . e i ".""•----------i---__• _F-1,-- 0 p 0-- 7. 9-;..-/ ....5 ef' pp o>-1- I . I I r . 1 • I 0*tit.."_.Z1. g . ''- • ' ...-----.E.17i..s.43..1-7 3--R 0. -.1..:-.-. Ot..411.11.7.-cour . Pie 1 El g•___- _-_____i eL i 1 - 1 1 . 75 I . - 5)iL e- 1::"'' i o,1,--a._A_.:=---:.:7 0 I f .Ji 0-..j..10._ 7 Of • k.ti.,- . 1•: f 2;41..' z;,-:•C.••.•,; I t-,:i's•-71••;--•,.'..-,...- r.,... rrexee,e4...J...eate¢.=.esee=e---...--.^.-....-.--...--....--,-,-------..- 4.-....--....,-.--..--e-e7;44-", 0 '-';L: VI 1 Ar",.4/4-, (4.• r; ‘F',1 [ c). .- 444.r..44 4, lr •:-47 ii ''••.. ,.......L r,,,0 -.) ,:49 FAT 1),p ue'.4.419 ....i.-.0- - p g i I/ 7.-- --L-.2,:::::___._ii • z-'----.11', -..--. . -_4,---'-':-• ,- i19':------:..11 --; ------ :„...:::::..: • , L__;,------1--_-,---,..-;--.7-‘, v--- ----,--- 7---- ----ii •-- - :• . - 1„.....,....-11-za.1:;._:-._:4-•--:.------ A.--- — --1:,-- _.__--- ,--------- ---- It----- - r -1---------------- -- -- 11- g- ,11 • il I IIi 1 e ' 3. - •t,— •. ...! ;.eir"r...tiII I DONALD DANA ' SHORELINES VARIANCE FILE NUMBER V-006-80 7,/ i/e-e." enton Planning Department DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET APPl i cati.on :j Or.-0 40)-,4 0vele.viV lie `'4-61_ LY }a1 s f;d'U C SN" r e g. ZT ,,-s,79, /tee 'P'6 el p. 7 A9® a c-assay a : Dia o- . to?r fr-o-i .FL r--. s Location G t Ao; /RRe Eck App1 i cant,(..ezn. a 4on t , TO : Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :. 4VE701 Police Department A, R, C, MEETING &/- L_ Pibl is Works Department I ' Engineering Division i 4,7 Traffic Engineering Building Division 1UtilitiesEngineering I Fire Department RtITWRFM. IAIREGDI ' G TIS A' SHOLDCATIONREVIEWCOWfCU -ACE (ARC) TO 3E. HELD OffV ?D Al 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCETii`„ 1 F j *YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT BE ' ABLE TO ATT N THE= ARC, EL VASE PROVIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING ;DEPARTMENT BY 5 e 00 PM ON G-? /° REVIEWING! DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: A Approved Approved with conditions rNot APp,roved e D 1 J` I G l ` vl c-_S '-Tr"l-l. ` c, E ee i" 6<--:;!. ., ,...6e),) (-_,--,7. - 79---.--, I ° C 6 g‘igna-turej e- Director or Authorized .Representative I A+. REVIEWINCI DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1' %-fir- J-GCJ Approved Approved with conditions X Not Ajtp,roved jt i i t ( a. •-tr- 7 z'. c ?,,, 7 0 ,A/c i c ill GI 6=%?C_ /..IL .l' 'r-?S'6.' ! C (' 6: ' ':/ 1 icnatur . of lirectoror Authorized Representative ' Date 1 v 1 lJ 1 1 1 1, t.V d .. ..a. v,.ar . . y.as .1 a.1 \'..'L-'"1 i...a::`v:'o=v.=.___;__—:_--_—_.—— —.. _LT—,. L= ei/e)o ' • Renton Planning Departmen'u - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET s A p p) i cat ion :,-. y-e !4 e"'F. '==.e,e)4 fin s('e,n e.A0 v4l e dF q? 40257^ !eTA e E,:.a.&,a c 1.f. 1f 6 / d/ r w d g`Y';+° ""?'- f'QcT' F az'!4C_ rJC/Yd,y ,/ ® P 777 Location ° 5°a l_ r.! ,moo TO : Parks Departmentp SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :.? c, Police Department A. R. Co MEETING,_?2/a Public Works Department i Engineering Division Traffic Engineering A ( r„VAI ,) E3uiiding Division c1 :vA-11- A t l lifi.ies Engineering RiB i; "`;n T i„,0 ''r 11e .Department r' i/AEG DN '? l s 1 PROVIDEDIN1R1T1NGRFORGTHETAPJLICATIO ! aEVIEWSCO JFCO1FERENCE Gr(ARC)GU O BE B F.IEy L 8' _-_ _ AT 9 :00 AM IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROM IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE V LL NOT BE ' ABLE TO ATT N THE ARC, PLEASEP PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE YLANN I NG ,D(PARTMENT BY 7: UO PM ON ._OC)//C3/c$ Q REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION + _ Approved teApproved with conditions Not APproved yt-lGsS mile,% '/ADS /, c-e- ,,t.ems-'e-/9lid AS €,:r.+.'o -e f'Aer+OP2 rest F yi:1c Iwo Ai/., ,' ,Fy/45` cope -- .S 4aiie/i O Cd f'V. t 1'--) / S--( ,411--2/C: dl y'may_-_-. ._...____^_._-__._ _...._.._ _7.440icnatureofDirectororAu -or i zed Representative__ _.Date REVIEWING ;DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 6.1 Approved Approved with conditions Not A' roved Ti,/ „..„,„ /,..„.e.,,d„.. dg 1,-,--Z‘j- 60-e..„,4-_. eszr---e 1--14.-t-C' 1 , 7A---12 5,,, -.--f,e______ r am- - - Signature of Director or Authorized Re resentat•i e ate f Appendix F 1 76 EDITION I = a UNIFORM FIRE CODE t- ,hall be ro- PPendix F Containers v•tth tight-fitting., orself-closic:_ 1:, i i l tor the temporary storage of combustible trash or rubbish. j j, APPENDIX i All electrical equipment installed and used must be in accord- Ili -- with the Electrical Code as it applies to wet. damp and hazardous 1i• _i , 46 R 1„eons. i h facilities shall_conform to the requirements set forth in theSec 4 Fire Code and NFPA Standard No. 303-excepts herein provided° - FIREliPROTECTION rs, h aO e , floattssEwith facilities for mooring or servicing five ed with fire t> 1. GENERALI or more vessels, and marine service stations shall be g ors xa' i facilities shall be approved by the rotecticr. equipment as follows: Plans for marina fire protection facr i fj a) All portions of floats exceeding 250 feet in distance from fire r' Fire Chief or authority having"jurisdiction prior to installation. The apparatus access and marine service stations shall be provided with an I completed work shall be subject to final inspection and approval after 1M1° approved wet standpipe system, installed in conformity with applicable installation. i µstandards set forth in NFPA Standard No. 14 and Article 13 of this e`, 2. DEFINITIONS Code. a) FLOAT shall mean any floating structure normally used as a I. Hose stations shall be so spaced as to provide protection to anyportionoffloatsorfloatingvessel. Hoses shall be mounted on apointoftransferforpassengersandgoodsand/or for mooring per- s reel or rack and enclosed within an approved cabinet. Hose stafIposes.F; , teens shall be labeled "FIRE HOSE IERGENCY USE b) MARINA shall mean a portion for the ocean nr i servicing or bons' All equipment shall meet the approval ofR theE Chief. either naturally or artificially protected the mooring, or • safety of vessels, and shall include artificially protected works; the « • - a At the shore end, the waterline shall be equipped with a single T public or private lands ashore; structures or facilities provided within inch department connection. the enclosed body of water and ashore for the mooring or servicing of 3 2-incin fires shall de normally ben dry where area is subject to freez e. F vessels or the servicing of their crews or passengers. 4 in temperatures. rapparatus access t_ c) I'iErR shall mean a structure built over the water and supported +' tW b) Piers nd wharves shall be provided with fire ti- r place, pleasure pavilion, etc. t by pillars or VEpileSSEL shall used as a landing roads and water supply systems with on-site fire hydrants as may be t than VESSEL shall mean every description of water craft, other ys$ ' required bythe Chief. Such roads and water systems shall conform to p p of seaplane on the water, used or capable being used as a means q s,rs : article I3. of transportation. 5. PORTABLE FIRE PROa`GTIO.! EQUIPMENT h- F. e) WHARF shall mean a structure or bulk head constructed of -_ a) One fire extinguisher, ?A; 20 B:C rating minimum, shall be wood, stone, concrete, etc., built at the shore of a harbor, lake or river provided in each hose station required.for vessels to he alongside of, and piers or floats to be anchored to. 414rs and number of all other fire 4 3. FIRE PREV'Ef3Si0l REGU ITlOft1S b) The Chief shall deli pate the type appliances to be installed and maintained in each marina._ a) Persons having charge or control over any structure, including PP pier or wharf, shall not allow the deposit or permit the accumulation of TRANSMISSION OF ALARMS 9i Means shall be available for the immediate notification of the Fire x combustible debris or rubbish on land beneath such structure, pier or 6. lz wharf. Department. b) No person shall use any open flame device for maintenance or p vessel, float, pier or wharf without a permit. 7. MAINTENANCE OF ACCESS RI repair on any1 icc) No persvnshall use any portable barbecue, arpermit. cooking Access shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Article device on any vessel, float, pier, or wharf without a permit. y 13. d) Any open flame device used for lighting or decoration on the - 2 vessel, float, pier or wharf must be approved by the ".{ft" 8. MARINE SERVICE STATIONS exterior of any Marine service stations shall conform to Article 15. Chief. k e) Any spills of fiarnmable or combustible liquids at or upon the .•, f water shall be reported immediately to the Fire Department or juris- -, .• .;L. 2i31 dictional authorities. L'• 213E gw:= _,, max r c &1" l,, l. 4.',,,-,4blV4i7t..;: r-. R4. 1.& 1- 4..% A4-•4•.---„ 0- p, 4.,„'. 4- i- 1,- I. 1, 7.,.'A-':''' 4,,-,T•,.'-''-o-';,.,U.-.-,. 1` v,, W-.,.':----Lr i--•., e i d= y s'x{.{ T.. .r t^P" • S' ,fit r s; at yr Ifi,'S° 1 ,:”,-. 1 - s ayw'. .st" 4zkr, •;y' waP ' yz j. II rI a ., k.;, L. 4.‘i 1.ocI.` s• x ti t l 4'f w a g ' ; j' ri! S6, i i 1 I ens._{ r i,fa..' 1 y y2` f 9Nd a' tr a•' jf k.r, 1 , x x k 4 d Ltr J i4 Y y. lk y µ2 9{ 5z a \ •s. r r x `(`i i.' 41 ? 4• 'tiF' b d +, r #gyp {" t ' w• P7' t 0. * 1•+i,4 i 3. GENET L LOCATI : .: ND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5219 RIPLEY LANE NORTH LEG i DE RIPT9ON: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT . jl I i I I I S; P 1STED TO '' `EDIFY PROPS TY "WNE S OF ii b}'•k 1 t.'Av Se r. y I ''.4f•W * Y:''v. A y ...' F Y H Y S°1 qn y FnyK i, '4 ,,L(,. zip F.' k vt srk', p, '? i`''"4 ,g I 4,,.r„ 1' wZ F+'. i,,,r}a L'v' d'A' ri•7' A Y4 J'ly ".'.. I re, =E HELD-, I ' CITY COUNCIL CH. 1t..E li S, ( UN CIPA L BUILDING ON 1FEBRUARY 19 . 1980 BEGIN 4;'NG AT 9 :00 A .M . A Ai; I le 0 N•%, E 71-1 4rk G IT j. r il Wif 1 Iv 11(.3. 1 . 4. 71 oil :,i. ;,c,... rLeJ SFTEy, + ;%C.)VL 1111 fli ` , r« rf ttt L sty@ t sc r 7V ror e +, R rr /.+ T {' s Y'^y ,'s :} + 8c..- . ,r^.r ss. w ., t 9 3T'F :•k'74. i , iF pi E r.. 4! an i%.ri i;4 I -, ,{ t r! y' A `f --W'' x , r. l.: fi fi .o-» A 1 $ 1 VARIANCE FROM THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM TO EXTEND DOCK 70 FEET BEYOND 100 FOOT MAXIMUM ALLOWED 1 F. FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 MIS NOTICE NOT TO BE ' .o>.: s VED WITHOUT P-OPE'". AUTH RZATIO I 1 OF R- v 1111 THE CITY OF RENTONU `; * MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 oNAL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT 90 cos 235— 2550 94rFD February 1 , 1980 Richard Seaborn Waterfront Construction Company 925 2nd St . South Kirkland, Washington 98033 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM , File V-006-80 ; property located at 5219 Ripley Lane North Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on December 6 , 1979 . A public hearingbeforetheCityofRentonHearingExaminerhasbeensetfor February 19, 1980, at 9 : 00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : CAlt ("WA_ Rog 5. Blayl ck Associate Planner cc : Don Dana 5219 Ripley Lane North Renton , Washington 98055 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER A . HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 , AT 9 :00 A.M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . DUNN LUMBER COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT LUMBER STORAGE BUILDING IN B-1 ZONE , File SP-004-80 ; property located at 120 Factory Avenue North . 2 . RICHARD SEABORN , WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY , FOR. DONALD DANA; APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM , File V-006-80 ; property located at 5219 Ripley Lane North . 3 . RICHARD SEABORN , WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, FOR HERB NISSEN , APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM , File V-005'-80 ; property located at 5201 Ripley Lane North . Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON FEBRUARY 19 , 1980 AT 9 :00 A .M . TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : February 6, 1980 GORDON Y . ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , Steve Munson , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , on the 31st day of January , 1980 . SIGNED : 1144;47144444011 WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY im, 4i o 925-2ND ST. SOUTH 827-8976 ff_' , . N.ntuH KIRKLAND, WASH. 9SL7 3 December 3 , 1979 City of Renton Planning Department Renton, Washington Re: Donald Dana 5219 Ripley Ln.N. Renton, Wa 98055 Gentlemen: As legal agent for the above, I am requesting a variance of 80 ' from your 100 ' maximum length re- quirement as outlined in your master program. This 180 ' long pier will be a floating pl.fLand constructed our of fir and there will -be approximately seven piling supporting this pier structure. Additionally, we are asking that three mooring piling be driven out- side the 100 ' limit. After takingKeveral accurate soundings it has been deter- mined that there is s allow water shelf in the area. This shelf runs in a Southerly direction for several hun- dred feet and a Northerly direction for a few hundred feet, then the water depth returns to normal . Without the granting of this variance, Donald Dana cannot possibly use his property for boat moorage beyond a small ski boat. Because this shallow water shelf extends even further than the proposed pier, this project will not hinder the normal navigation of vessels in the area. The proposed length of th^ pier is not unusual to piers in the surrounding vicinity. I feel the proposed pier will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the master program. If you need further comment or have any questions on this project please call me at anytime. Sincerely, RICHARD SEABORN d$: Permits & Sales Mgr. RS : fg cif J , CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON f;I I I1) )\` APPLICATION SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTIPERMIT.—.......... APPLICATION NO. SM- 7`D PUBLICATION DATES p• SEC. -TWP . -R . DATE RECEIVED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DATE APPROVED ZONING DATE DENIED WATER BODY APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 14 BELOW: 1 . Name of applicant Richard Seaborn of Waterfront Const. Co. , Inc. 2 . Mailing address 925 2nd St. South, Kirkland, Wa 98033 Telephone 827-8976 3 . Applicant is : Owne r Lessee Contract purchaser I Other (specify) Contractor 4 . Name and address of owner, if other than applicant: Donald C. Dana 5219 Ripley Lane N. , Renton, Wa 98055 Telephone 226-8357 5. General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection) 5219 Ripley Lane Nbrth, Renton, Wa 98055 6 . Legal description (if lengthy, attach as separate sheet) Asper attached Area (acres or sq. ft. ) N/A 7. Name of adjacent water area or wetlands : Lake Washington 8 . Intended use of property: Private boat moorage. 9 . Generally describe the property and existing improvements : Private single dwelling. 10. A. Total construction cost and fair market lue of p.ropose7aE7) •.;' , d; bprojectincludingadditionaldevelopmentsctemplateutnot._ included in this application: 9 , 500 r' ` '' \ 1,, t L) , \ rjf _ B. Construction dates (month and year) for which permitis •requestod: Begin March 1979 EndApril 1979 11. Does this project require a shoreline location? ' Explain. Yes 12 . List any other permits for this project from state, federal , local governmental agencies or the City of Renton for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and If so, the date of the application, whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same , and the number of the application or permit:: Army Corp of Engineers. Dept. of Ecology City of Renton 13 . Site and vicinity maps (Refer to application instructions) : As per attached. 14 . Additional information: We propose to construc+ floating pier 180 ° in length. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss CITY OF RENTON I , ' , (,.6- 4 <.,, _. c„-, being:)ti duly sworn, certify that I am the above-named applicant for a permit to construct a substantial development pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and that the foregoing statements , answers , and information are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Z//, z.. 7 /1 Sign'ature) vl,rN Subscribed and sworn to me this (r, day of _) QQ IZJtu d ,I ilN.------' 1 Ctk__(--, )2/ otary Pit liein acid Efor ith ' State op a hington, resi`dvng at O\U.(IUL('A City of Renton Planning Dept. 2-73 AFFIDAVIT Don Dana being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the- information herewith Submitted -are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed' and sworn before me this 29 day of November 19 79 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Seattle Jjy,- If c.; Name of Notary Public) Signature of Owner) jIe 73 .5219 Ripley Lane No. CAddress) Address) Renton, Washington City) State) 226-8357 Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application ha's been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 gmg,.030., .0.1g.0,0 ciiIi1 . 334330 2031 Of 5219 RIPLEY LANE NORTH 9i;D'i4 Liwo--;a POugLO C C104 cD.s.:',o 3 lc rem 22744 kVA 031 v., 3 003 pone NE in 29 t 24 itta 05 LEM Ei110071,113 LOT 33-34-15 BLOCK C HILLMANS LK WI GARDEN OF EDEN 0 334 I Sil LD3 (-10J FOR :3 il SO LDS cDJ SLY Ltt Pf.40 CI c9-31-09 bi i 112. 03 FT .TH H OS DEG 41 MIN 39 SEC ti 240 FT rft PT 17 FT NLT Or NI (Oa 07 ,10 a POR OF 36 a sw LDS NDJ co Og 1W RW3 % • !29 DEG 31.AIIH 09...SE(-A 131. 42 FT TH H 80 DEG 41 niw 39 SEC A 220 FT FR PT 19 F7 slor of se CO2 G; 10 I1z1;v./. ./,....... ; -:_:: : • ' • . I4,-,-,' ', ; - ..),„, • \ : '''k..:• ‘,.,••: • . '..;:. , ', • :: : r '. et..1-- • - . -:'I.• i• ,.:::' :. .. '. * q.27, t.-? s_)- . '',., /7:3:: , . ' . , ..: :: • .; ., . :, . • .. i i :,I ' , . , . , . 1, r,,u LJ750JT215103/16/73 10/11/7111595291 10500:61EC '15000 T 2161 02/01/73 • • • lOokvALUELAW 737110 .• ::1,;'...., - :...,, .. 1(0500 .T 2151 12/07/74 - ::. REVALUED : • ,. 103300T21 % 05/31/7S • ' REvALUE0 :. •• . , '. ..1 . , 77 ' : : v',:•• • :, 706)00 T . 2151 04/10/76 • •:.: ,REvALUED .' s . 78 ': : I::- ' ' ' - 101300 T ' 2151 04/16/7? ! . : REVALUED .J . "il 1 0 . I : • i1 : ',. ., :;' :•':•• 1. • li 1 .g g LAND DATA BUILDING DATA iZONEACTUAL -:-• • RES SEWER AvAILAGLE '- , . , YES ' USE TYPE SiNGLE BASErVENT (,g7.4.ZA 15004 VLIEPLACE SINGLE. 3;k.;.7.HIGHEST t BEST . , - • . YES STORM SEVER •••••-• NO USE FINiVED AREO : 1500 ' UULTI-FLOOR 1EUNIT ,'. . ,., ..., SITE UNDGRNO UTIL1TIES:-. NO SUITS S , . • 1 N-ITL!ANT YES ' VQZE-STaNDInG NO<VALUE , 441200 HATER SYSTEM -: A-DIST YEAR GUILT ' ' --.2-, 1975 ExTERIOR Cili(K • : • NOW! GaD OUTLETS 1IIATERSuPPLY : ; .. STAN ExTERIOR STONI . NONE :POLIO-7EStiATERFRONT . ••:: — : LAKE EFFECTIvE YEAR: 197B QRTHS VULL , ': 2 OPEN • • 1S0LOTWIDTH75DOCKSW .' y....- G000 OATHS 3/4 1 . DCA% 410WIDTHUSEABLE : : • 100x TIDELANDS :: :• '.':',' • GRADE R1-09400 BATHS 1/2 tIONE , OtCK 14DLOTDEPTH170VIEtt . : ,,. ...,. .'. , •,.. ". TM(-SW(-LAUND .. I POOL AREA r(ONiDEPTHUSEABLE ,• : .:: , 82 LAKE ': :, :: . :. . EXCEL STORIES 1. 0 OTHFA SINGLE 1 'STREET ACCESS . ,..:: • '. .sTrui • CITY : : -:: . .,.', :,:.' GOOD ' TOTAL ROOMS g OUILT-INS 4 -ALLEY ••• - . :, , NO . • . ' • ' -. -..: :• -. DINING YES ADEQUATE1CURDSiGUTTERS '...,•' NO UTILIZATION — :: • STAN FAMILY-DEN-REC ".: 1 OStiT. G . AREA NONESTREETSURFACE - • ASPHALT RESTRICTIONS ' ''' • STAN BEDROOMS 4 ATT. GP.I. AREA 770 CONCRETE Aflin 1030TRAFFIC..;::.! • '..H.'::-.; ' LIGHT EXT. NUISANCES .: : 1; . STAN . DET, GAR. AREA _ NONE ,ASPNALT wain 27,3D••• ,:•:,,,,,.,;:-....,•.: :: •• . ;:.; • . . . PERM. PEVIEL-4 ,: :: ' ;.': NO FIRST FLOOR AREA d520 :0: :.' ':.:-•' •-• g: • !,..'..,,'' ' •'• OBSOLESENCE:: • : :•::','•:' :t . . g.i.' • ,:. : : ARPORT mEA• - ': - umf sm. FULL STY " • HONE PARKING STALLS 2 wEnTED ApEA 30E0 'g FINISHED ATTIC . • •1 HEAT SOURCE GAS NONE 1 NEAT SYSTEN 555 , r.-.- ,,,1---,;:-2-- ,- J i-„, _.-... 1-1 1-. cf , Aio, c\) 1.: 14.---e_ -0--ct_.c 4,`,..;,,:-.40 ..±:___ . . _._,,cci,c.= i_,:", 1, :51 1 wi era Le,8_ i 1 I I 6 L. I 4--20--›F 'Lk e!..... - --->-K4e.7: 11 11.,,. iv i?,!;:: ,,,\.:::,-...e. _ i 7-- V A C? 7.- .---•D - ., I 1 " A . a' F,. ,.- i.--Lc -1:72-ri,47i,_7,-., r l's i 1 -•-:. • _ .. : •„ •• ..::.. • • - - -•., i 9 .....,_. 7-1_„\rcposi 7) F-7714,5 ‘ b . I f.....F1 I c 1 Hcor ,j 7"raj CO vIT1 • 5c.c./-e_. i___-_-:: te. _ _ 0 f L.,.. I Li 7 ------i'---2 -• 1 i • pro.,-;, r-,,,,- N.-- I______- A .1 A I .•5- ' - 3.. ., -________,-----_ Fv-o io 0„c c......-,;(7---- __.4.. lr''''''... 77...-•--L............... MP. I 717 0----C•t- .-E.-7L/0---...5--rf-. t> 5i.6 Ili I I.:a po..s-.:e_c..1 __S tt p p 0.----r- I I I •. i t./4) 71-?2-FIT41__Ali._g_. y----.Ey i_s.,4.-;..1-,3=.13 0- -..14,._.i3 L.,.I k I.,e,,,€' • I eit ii zer 4--•1 I 7•_:: . - . - ,i7 . 1 I ' . .5`.:-I-e_. P.1- .71-11-__±...30 i L _F--1 a—1_0- 9.,_ _3 0 1 ITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM cra\b, 91,\ ‘ ., FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ' • 13 1919 . Application No'. ' ' EJ o--16 i>` 7/'fd 1/1 - ' Environmental Checklist No.6="--- 50-Td fr A 4.mod`' PROPOSED, date:FINAL, date: r Declaration of. Significance Ei Declaration of Significance Declaration of N'on-Significance , 0 Declaration of Non-Significance ' COMMENTS : Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a, major action. Please answer the 'following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the. space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include'the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed , even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork •in the future. V NOTE: This is a standard form being used by' all- state and local agencies in the State • of Washington'fbr various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal: , If a question does not' apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. r ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1-. Na'me- of Proponent f e./..ii.,ee .sec(„:` -• Cc- c• D)L, psi •, ei - 2. Add'® p p ress and p hone number of Proponent: 1 I rT; , ;r -i' t- J-- /9 4.. • v ".wiz t'4 ,---,, /.04., • r I C. 3. - Date- Checklist submitted 27/ / 7 4. Agency requiring Checklist _ of r^ / a •-t° P.--e's ce..-7 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: r „ 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : q / V r C``y,9 S '3 s. .I e. 4 Alf f /. G , `7 6 /,ch.e,G° A J / F t [ P "z e; I I . -•#' -0- ..'H 47 4! 4-i 1$ / S 44 el, --e P G'(--' '1 /1 6`y $ T_ d 2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : 7•Z /9 1, ,<7// 70"62.--e, 1 • l 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal federal , state and local --including rezones) : Y/ e!, r 4 - 4 • 4 c, 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion , or further adtivity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes , explain: A/o 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain: Al 12. Attach any other application form that. has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRR:,+MENTAL IMPACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1) Earth: ,Mill the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? TES— MAYBE 0 b) ,Disruptions , displacements , . compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES MAYBE . NO c), Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ES MAT(BE N'0 d) . The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO e)'' lAny increase in wind or water erosion of soils , either on or off the site? 7` YES MAYBE NO f) j 'Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which 1 may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? e" YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3- I 2) Air. 'Will the proposal result in: a) Air ,emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO/ b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE NO c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate , either locally or regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 3) Water.' Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents , or the' course of direction of water movements , in . either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO b) ) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO c).; ;Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE 0 d)' Change in the amount of -surface water in any water . body? YES , MAYBE 0 e)i '• Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? I YES MAYBE NO f'),1 Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? YES MAYBE NO g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception, of an aquifer- by cuts or excavations? J YES MAYBE NO h); Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO i 1) ' Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies?YES MAYBE NO Ex'planation: 4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? i YES MMA BBE NO b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora?YES MAYBE NO c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? YES MAYBE NO d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 4- 6) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of J ., any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish , benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO- b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO c)) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , j or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? '1, 2,03 Y'ES MAYBE NO Explanation: 7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or, glare? YES MBE N Explanation: 8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 9) Natural, Resources. Will the proposal result in: a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? YES MAYBE NO b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource.? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 10) R,sk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO Ex'olanation: 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?YET' MAYBE N(- r Explanation: 5- i 12) Hou'sinq. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Y,ES MAYBE NO Explanation: 13) Tra-nsportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : a,)•, Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES MAYBE NO b) 1• Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? I YES MAYBE U0 d)' Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES • MAYBE, NO e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? 14 YES MAYBE NO f)' Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or re'su t in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : a) Fire protection? YES MAYBE NO b) Police protection? YES MAYBE NO c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO d) Parks or other recreational facilities? YES MAYBE NO e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? 7( YES MAYBE NO f) Other governmental services? YES MAYbE NO Explanation: 15) Energx. ij Will the proposal result in : a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 4( YES MAYBE NO Explanation : 16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : a), Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO b), Communications systems? s YES MAYBE NO c): 'Water? YES MAYBE NO 6- d) Sewer or septic tanks? YES MAYBE fl e) Storm water drainage? YES MAYBE NO ' f)• ,Solid waste and disposal? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 17) Human, Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any, health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NOX Explanation: 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality_._or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?YES MAYBE NO Explanation: 20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE NO ' Explanation: - III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there te any willful misrepresentation or willful lac of full disclosure• on my part. Proponent:4 signed) , name printed) City of Renton Planning Department 5-76