HomeMy WebLinkAboutECF_SEPA Checklist_Aeroplastics_230307_v1.pdfSEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 02/10/23
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or
"does not apply" only when You can explain why It does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision -
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information maybe necessaryto
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals. -
For non -project proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the
applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Dart D)
Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and
"property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
The lead agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements —that do
not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
A. Background
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: HerO-Plastics Inc. Tenant Improvements
833 Building 4Jay N. Renton, WA
2. Name of applicant: Richard Utt, Architect
SEPA E.;l ;.m0 0h ckftt (WAC 197-11.960) July 2016 f Page 1 Of 13
FILE NAME
ECF_Environ_Checklist 230212_v1
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 13801 51 5` Ave. West,
tamonas, vm. yov4u rimiu tvuiiluGi 206.794-4078
4. Date checklist prepared: ,bruary 9, 2023
5. Agency requesting checklist 'ity of Rento-
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): -3bruary 30, 2023
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal. ,ONE
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. NO
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Building Tenant Improvement Permit. Mechanical, Electrical and Paint Booth Hermit
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to Include additional speciflc information on project
description.)
The TI F-. _. includes the fabrication and assembly of parts to meet client contract
requirements as well as staging/storage associated with the product. A future demising wail will
be constructed for separation of Tenant uses. There will be no construction to the building shell
itself.
The project is a Tenant Improvement of 16,852 SF within an existing 40,310 SF warehouse
structure located on a 62,578 SF (1.44 acres) site.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required th duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist. 833 Houser Way N. Renton, WA. Tax Lot 082305-9193 Parcel D
SEE ATTACHED SURVEY and SITE PLAN EXHIBIT A-1, A-2 & A-3
B. Environmental Elements
1. Earth
a. General description of the site:
SEPA Envlronmental ehwk1st MAC 19741.969) July 2010 Page 2 of 13
The 833 Building is an existing one-story concrete tilt up warehouse in a Warehouse
Industrial Park situated on level, flat terrain with existing parking, loading docks, driveways
and landscaping located adjacent to Houser Way N. in Renton, WA.
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 3%
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils. aclai l ul
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils In the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. ......
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. NO
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No change to existing site.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NONE
REQUIRED
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known See Attached LXHlbi I a, ruget �ouna dean Air
Hgency muporn
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. NO
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ONE
REQUIRED.
3. Water
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
SEPA EmAronmeMl chaeldhd (WAC 197-11 880) July 2016 Page 3 of 13
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities If known.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
NO
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
b. Ground Water:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? if so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. NO
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged Into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals ... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve —
c. Water runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, If known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow Into other waters? If so, describe. ,vo unange io exisung site or
SEPA EaWmnmenW checrdlet (WAC 19741-80) July 2016 J Page 4 of 13
stormwater system.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe. NO
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattem impacts, if any: [vo,+�- \Glf [[- I VV --r, UCII 1!j uul1 G/UJ Ul I& Jl LQ-
4. Plants
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Kreuter Vesuvius Flowering Plum
Street Trees
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs Otto Luyken Laurel,
_grass Prairie Dropseed
_pasture
crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoll, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any: Jone required, existing to remain,
e. List all noxious weeds and Invasive species known to be on or near the site.
5. Animals
Page 5 of 13
SEPA EnvironmenchecMist (WAC 187. I-M) Ju1y2016
tal
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site.
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. 'NONE
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, 0 any: NONE
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. NONE
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc. and Natural Gas is existing on site. One ..atural Gas HVAC unit
heats Product Assembly and Display/Common Area of Building. Warehouse is heated by 5
Natural Gas Reznor Heaters. All new machinery/equipment is electrically powered and
complies with all the current energy efficient standards
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:..,. , lergy
„L ,nachinery and equipment.
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
NUNL
9EPA Emdroementai checklist (WAC 187-11-M) Judy sole Page 6 of 13
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located within the project area and In the vicinity.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's EE EXI-iIBIT C Chemical Inventory List
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. ZONE
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Waste removal necessary from fabrication/manufacturing process will not
impact or use any existing site facilities. All waste products generated will be
collected on site and disposed of off -site by independent environmentally
responsible waste companies i.e. Safety Kleen Waste Collection and Services.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a.
short-term or a long -berm basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site ]ONE. All work will be inside the building.
• Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, tf any: 'BONE REQUIRED
& Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
i'he current warehouse site is zonea im r-ieavy indusurai z-uniny. Adjacei lL wa1 G11UUSG
properties are also zoned IH Heavy Industrial. All of the properties are located in Park Drive I
and Park Drive II, a Warehouse Industrial Park. The current proposal will not affect current land
uses on, nearby or to adjacent properties.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non -
forest use?
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:-
9EPA Emirwnw4al dMeMist (WAC 197-1I-NO) JWy 2016 Page 7 of 13
c. Describe any structures on the site. 833 Building is a one story Concrete Tilt -up Building.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? NO
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? IH Heavy Industrial Use
f. What Is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? ..-I Heavy Industrial / EA
Employment Area.
g. If applicable, what Is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, spe*.
Seismic Zone identified by the City of Renton Information Technology-GIS Map on partial
west side of property. Structural Analysis has been performed on the 833 Building by
CoughlinPorterLundeen, Structural Engineering. See attached EXHIBIT D
Seismic/Structural Basis of Design Report.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
13 ei )yees
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? 'NONE
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NONE REQUIRED
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any: NONE REQUIRED
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any-
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing.
$EPA Environmental ehOddhit (WAC 197-114 0) July 2010 y � Page 8 of 13
b. Approximately how many units, ifany, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing. N/A
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? N/A
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? NONE
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, If any: DONE, Structure is
Existing
11. UBht and Glero
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur? Greet and Building Lighting are existing in warehouse inausinai parK wrncn are
curnruuud by photocells. No changes are proposed for the project.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? NONE
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: BONE REQUIRED
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? NONE
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. `40
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: N/A
9EPA EnvhoemantM ChaCM181 MAC 19711-960) July 2016 Page 9 of 13
I& Historic and cuftura/ preservation
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so,
specifically describe. NO
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural Importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources. NO
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
NONE REQUIRED
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
Existing street system proviaes access to project sne mciuuu ly -.+vo, t-rouser way
Bypass, N 8"1 Street, N Southport Dr, Houser Way N
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? if so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? .apidRide F
Line provides nearest transit stops to the tacurty. , ne ua Z:-1t ZILUN utotiu,iz, ale at Garden
Ave N and N 101 Street. The closest stop at N 1011 Street is approximately'/2 mile away.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? ce accommodates 10 parking
spaces on the east siae of the ouuuincy am o {jai nmy z>Ndtza on the west side. No additional
parking would be required for the project. No parking spaces would be eliminated.
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private) J Uf iai IyG to Vniaui 1;
9EPA Emdronmenbd cbmkHM MAC 187-11-M) Ady 2010 T Page 10 of 13
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, germirally describe. An existing BNSF rail line runs along the west edge
of the site property wnicn serves the industrial and manufacturing area on the east side of
Renton. This rail line will not serve the project site.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If
known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and non -passenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates? . —--ility will generate 26 passenger
vehicular trips/day by the 13 employees. Employee hours will be from 5:00am-3:30pm
Monday -Thursday as noted by Tenant.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect, or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: JONE REQUIRED
M Public Services
a. Would the project resuR in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. IONS
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
ele'"";— -- -al gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer stormwater system,
septic system,
other comcasr
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed. Jo new utilities or general construction activities are proposed Tor project. W
utnures ruquired for the project are existing.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
SEPA Environmental ehealdlal (WAC 187-11-M) Judy 2016 Page 11 of 13
Name of signee _''ichard V. Utt
Position and Agency/Organization _ Vch itect—
Date Submitted: _u2/ib/zuzj
D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them In Conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terns.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
NONE
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: N/A
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cuitural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce Impacts are:
SEPA Environmental aheakllet (WAC 197-1I-M) July 2016 Page 12 of 13
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
B. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
SEPA Environmental Ctmil t (WAC 187-11rB00)duty 2016 Page 13 of 13
W AVM lOWMV M -IN
AMM 3= 61" MEOVIV1 V to
a
i*11111a
g r-I
locoISINALielii6ettieE isa�ies.itI �I co no it. 2-e* t40li Be\t40DEMY9 a• 4x0 .I•O,e III
l
W
r yr 4 Y ^t
i
�W
Z
tz
W
V
Z
a
S
Q
0
a
f«+,5-� :_,'.�•! e;,li._ }. r tr � �. �• � • r _ _ � �' � • !
r fir. },rlrj`i•=. i•.:., t'r r' ,
t�,is: A`IiSK .��� ,� �� r -er�Yo (, `,}•� � `i����'1F
�r,`•.1. '
'€:SPI ��I�1�`�.yt �`•y�s 1,� S�[.,l.�.A ..-s- `€ ! i. s 1' • > ,�r?x}-ram .. � •t�`°`�"��,
� 1�l�l+4i r •�, i -, �;t {.���, �..r. �.' `"�. !{�..€. N..s.l.•�,� ,! } y+,�'� `y4;�1. �. ';a y
ii�Iill-}rr� ��. is,ikriJ a, -. ii ,�r �,, 3i r� � .'� -�S cZ9�1. �� j' n `' � • ~•:
5- .d •il'3 �Tf:�"l�t. j1; r �"� T s ] F'•'.. i•t*!b� 7 ,� ����''�' ?"
}r ril ��• 1��4e z >• €'" -1 �'•i 'lr 4f r€., « i'::91, I°.1,��'2.�',. s -: ''•i t+<� ,
f_4�=: , }. � I. i i t a ,�sirr �sf € 4''•` - ;.: r�, ; g.�/y�7��tj�`�Me
i�'( 6 �,i`}�',FI A• tl13? -t#}
��al'J�i{ryyS{r1��•'yTil[[!€'iT�Ysl !•Y "• �.;i?.�s; ?�! y t!14�4 :� .� t _ ,F.- rol
Ixy �:
:�di�.'{:5F ,r:�`, .. �� �' } }' -.. .;;lei•'! • -" c:�.'i�i'•SYr�w�}!�-:
�,f•": ,., •n:.' F ��'i, �in! '� ti �' 11� '� � � fl,.I
"�} . ",'`'•� 1� •"i • // 'r.gr'2�`i1!I��`yI��yyji�T���;,,� C� t
:11 WA
7
04
AS •
W-It
vi
933 BUILD,
-4
833 OL C DETAILED VItINTY I%AP
RENTO WA.
EXHIBIT A-3
EXHIBIT B
CA\ et Sound Clean Air Age Notice c1221s
Pug
et g � Construction No.
PUGET SOUND
Clean Air Agency HEREBY ISSUES AN ORDER OF APPROVAL Registration No. 30387
TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, OR ESTABLISH Date
JUN 10 2022
Qty 1-Global Finishing Solutions Model # ENCG-381148-NDTFRFRFR OHT SP ENLCOSURE,
38'Wxl l'Hx481, providing 13,600 cubic feet per minute (CFM) of makeup air. Located within this
enclosure, two 2-Global Finishing Solutions open face spray booths Model #DFOCG-080808-NSB-2L-SP,
each with an exhaust flow rate of 6,400 cfin.
Qty 1-Global Finishing Solutions fully enclosed semi down draft spray booth and drying enclosure
Model # LESMG-120820-PSB-FR 1HD-CUF-SP SEMI-DOWNDRAFT, with an exhaust flow rate of 9,600
cfm from one exhaust stack and an estimated enclosure volume of 1,824 cubic feet.
Qty 1 Global Finishing Solutions paint mixing room Model # MG-151008-N-SP with exhaust flow of
949 cfm.
Qty two (2) Global Finishing Solutions Model # BLOTG-110812-PSB-FR SP low temp batch ovens with
estimated volume of %6 cubic feet each and 500 efin from one exhaust stack each.
OWNER
Aero-Plastics, Inc.
903 Houser Way N
Renton, WA 9SM-5509
INSTALLATION ADDRESS
Aero-Plastks, Inc.
833 Houser Way N
Benton, WA 98057-5572
THIS ORDER IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS
1 Approval is hereby granted as provided in Article 6 of Regulation 1 ofthe Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
to the applicant to install or establish the equipment, device or process described hereon at the
INSTALLATION ADDRESS in accordance with the plans and specifications on file in the Engineering
Division of the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency.
2. This approval does not relieve the applicant or owner of any requirement of any other governmental
agency.
3. The use of any individual material in the booths containing di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), methylene
chloride, chromium, lead, manganese, nickel, or cadmium is prohibited.
4. Tire total amount of VOC (not including water and exempt compounds) containing materials used in in
the booths must not exceed 750 gallons during any consecutive 12-month period. Orders or purchase
transactions for material usage along with the associated chemical constituent compositions (VOC
content), may be used in lieu of usage information.
5. The VOC and organic HAP content (minus water and exempt compounds) in primers sprayed, applied
and used shall not exceed 2.90 lbs of Organic HAP or VOC per gallon.
6. The VOC and organic HAP content (minus water and exempt compounds) in topcoats sprayed, applied
and used shall not exceed 3.50 lbs of Organic HAP or VOC per gallon.
7. Organic HAP emissions from specialty coatings as defined in Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
GG shall comply with the applicable HAP content level in 40 CFR 63.745(c)(5). This does not include
non -HAP materials as defined in 40 CFR 63.742 or low volume coatings as defined in 40 CFR 63.741(g).
Forte SO-118. (12115) Page No. I of
Order of Approval for NC No. 12212 JUN 10 2022
8. VOC emissions from specialty coatings as defined in Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GG shall
comply with the applicable VOC content level in 40 CFR 63.745(cx6). This does not apply to low
volume coatings as defined in 40 CFR 63.741(g).
Operating and Monitoring Requirements:
9. Spray application of material shall be confined to agency approved booths equipped with filter systems
that at all times cover the openings oftheir exhaust plenums including the edges of the corresponding
filter banks. Compliance demonstration with this requirement must at a minimum include daily
inspections of each filter system on days when the filter system's corresponding booth is in operation.
operation of a booth must cease if it is determined that its filter system does not completely cover the
openings of its exhaust plenum and corrective action must be taken prior to operation of the booth.
10. Each booth shall be operated so that all exhaust air passes through a filter system that meets one of the
following standards:
a. A system with a minimum initial overspray arrestance of 98.0 percent. Ovempray eirestance must
be determined using the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air -Conditioning
Engineers (ASHRAE) Method 52.1 procedure and substituting the synthetic test dust feed with
high solids bake enamel delivered at a rate of at least 135 grams per minute fiam a conventional
(non-HVLP) air -atomized spray gun operating at 40 pounds per square inch (psi) air pressure
with an air flow rate across the falter of 150 feet per minute. A system that complies with 40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart HHHHHH meets this requirement
b. A system that meets a minimum initial efficiency reporting value (MERV) of 13 as determined
by ASHRAE Method 52.2.
c. A system that meets a minimum initial filtration efficiency of 98.0 percent over the particle
diameter range from 0.30 to 10.0 microns. The particle size dependent filtration efficiencies must
be determined using either Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 319 or an Agency
approved method.
11. Each booth shall be equipped with an operable gauge that is maintained in good working order to indicate
the pressure drop across its exhaust filtration system. The acceptable pressure drop range shall be
established using the manufacturer's recommendations, specifications, or instruction; or shall be
established based on operator experience to maintain filter integrity and compliance with Condition Nos.
7 and 8. The established pressure drop minimum and maximum values must be clearly marked on or
nearby each gauge.
12. Each booth shall be operated at all times within the established pressure drop range across its
corresponding exhaust filter system. For each day of operation, the following shall be conducted:
a. inspection of each pressure drop gauge. Compliance with this requirement must at a minimum be
demonstrated when the corresponding booth is in operation.
b. inspection of actual pressure drop across the filter bank of each booth. Compliance with this
requirement must at a minimum be demonstrated when the corresponding booth is in operation.
c. Inspection of filter system coverage of each booth's exhaust plenum.
d. Results of each inspection must be recorded in a written log after completing the inspection and
prior to starting spray application operations.
e. if any of the above problems are identified for a booth, spray coating operations in the booth
must cease until corrective action has fixed the problem. Corrective actions must be taken and
documented in a written log prior to resuming operation of the booth.
13. The exhaust stacks of all booths shall have a vertical unobstructed discharge to the atmosphere at least six
feet above the roofline. A weatherproof stack exhaust configuration that does not obstruct the air flow as
it exits the stack is acceptable.
14. All spray application of material must be applied with an air -assisted airless spray gun, electrostatic
Form 50-1 l8, (lZ/l S)
Pegs N% 2 of 4
Order of Approval for NC No. 12212 JUN 10 M1
applicator, or high -volume low-pressure (HVLP) spray gun. Alternative spray technology must meet a
minimum transfer efficiency of 65 percent. The procedure used to demonstrate a spray technology's
transfer efficiency must be equivalent to South Coast Air Quality Management District's "Spray
Equipment Transfer Efficiency Test Procedure for Equipment User, May 24,1989" and "Guidelines for
Demonstrating Equivalency with District Approved Transfer Efficient Spray Guns, September 26, 2002."
A plan describing the hest procedure must be developed and submitted to the Agency 30 days prior to
conducting any spray technology transfer efficiency test.
IS. Spray application equipment must be cleaned in such away that an atomized mist or spray is not
discharged to the open air. Spray application equipment must be cleaned in a container or washer that
captures and collects all residue and cleaning solvent. Containers and washers must be kept closed at all
times except during manual cleaning or insertionhemoval of spray-ooating equipment.
16. All materials from which VOC9 can evaporate to the open air shall be disposed of in closed containers or
bags. This includes rags, wipes, paper vowels, and absorbents that become laden, soaked, or covered in
VOC-containing material.
17. All containers used for mixing, storing, or disposing VOC-containing materials shall be kept closed at all
times except during the following situations:
a. Cleaning of containers.
b. Depositing of materials in containers or removing of materials from containers.
c. Hand mixing of materials.
Recordkeeping Requirements:
18. The following records shall be kept onsite and up-to-date, and be made readily available to Agency
personnel upon request at all times:
a. A list of all materials containing VOCs used in the booths. Safety Data Sheets (SDS),
Environmental Data Sheets (EDS), Product Data Sheets (PDS) or manufacturer specific
formulation data may be used to determine whether a material contains VOCs (minus water and
exempt compounds).
b. The VOC content of each material used in the booths. SDS, EDS, PDS or manufacturer specific
formulation data may be used to document the VOC content.
c. Documentation to demonstrate compliance with filter requirements in Condition No.10,
d. Documentation to demonstrate compliance with spray gun requirements in Condition No.14.
e. The Operation and Maintenance (O&M) plan. The O&M plan shall be developed and
implemented per Agency's Regulation 1. The following shall be included in the O&M plan:
i. Filter maintenance.
ii. Filter inspection procedures.
iii. Procedures to correct operation of the spray booth when the pressure drop across the filter
bank deviates from the established range.
19. The following records shall be kept onsite and up-to-date for at least two years from the date of
generation, and be made readily available to Agency personnel upon request:
a. Within 30 days ofthe end ofthe month, documentation ofthe total amount in gallons of all
VOC-containing material used in the booths during the previous month and during any
consecutive 12-month period. Purchase records may be used as a surrogate for usage.
b. Within 30 days of the end of the month, documentation of the MDl lb/day applied in the booths
for each day of operation in the month.
c. Results of inspections to determine compliance with filter system requirements in Condition Nos.
9 and 12.
d. Documentation of pressure drops across the filter systems as required by Condition No. 12.
e. Documentation verifying any corrective action taken to maintain compliance with this Order of
For, 50-1 is, (ryls) Page No. 3 of
Order of Approval for NC No. 12212 JUN 10 2022
Approval.
Reporting Requirements:
20. The Agency shall be notified, in writing, within 30 days of discovering an exceedance of any limitations
identified in Condition Nos. 4 through S.
APPEAL RIGHTS
Pursuant to Puget Sound Clean Air Agencyr's Regulation 1, Section 3.17 and RCW 4311 B310, this Order
may be appealed to the pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB). To appeal to the PCHB, a written notice
of appeal must be filed with the PCHB and a copy served upon Puget Sound Clean Air Agency within 30
days of the date the applicant receives this Order.
Ralph Munoz
Reviewing Engineer
John Dawson
Engineering Manager
Form 50-119.02/15) Page No. 4 ok
EXHIBIT C
833 Bldg. AFRO -PLASTICS INC
TENANT IMPROVEMENTS
SCREENING LEVEL HMIS CHEMICAL INVENTORY REPORT
With Fire Department Ratings
2/3/23
PRODUCT NAME
DENATURED ALCOHOL
DENOLIT 80 NLGI 2
Grease for Grease Gun
DYNABRADE AIR LUBE
WD-40
ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL
73X BLACK MARKING INK
3M SCOTCH -WELD
URETHANE ADHESIVE
EC-33532 B/A
_ CONTAINER _ v FLAMMABLE COMBUSTIBLE RATING
5 GAL. FIB
1-2 TUBES C313
1 GAL.
C38
5 GAL.
C2
PLASTIC 55 GAL. DRUM
FIB
1 PINT
IB
2 GAL.
C3B
EXHIBIT D
833 MOUSER WAREHOUSE
Seismic/Structural Basis of Design
February 2023; Project No. S212808-01
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this document is to describe the structural analysis that has been performed on the
833 Houser North Warehouse to date, the findings and recommendations based on this analysis, and
the proposed design basis for the building strengthening. We understand a tenant improvement will be
performed on the building, with a change from warehouse occupancy to manufacturing in less than
50°A of the building. Our findings of the structural code requirements are presented below.
BUILDING DESCRIPTION
The building is located at 833 Houser North in Renton, Washington. The building is a one-story,
precast concrete, tilt up building constructed in the 19609. The building is on a relatively flat site.
There is an adjacent, smaller, one-story steel framed building to the north with a seismic joint between
the two buildings.
Original construction drawings are not available. A brief walkthrough has been performed to observe
the structure and existing conditions.
VERTICAL -LOAD -RESISTING SYSTEM
The roof consists of plywood over 2x wood subpudins at 24-inches on -center spanning to
4x16 pudins at approximately 8-feet on -center spanning to glulam girders. Wood columns
support the roof framing at the interior and the perimeter Is supported by precast concrete
pilasters built into the tilt -up panels.
LATERAL -LOAD -RESISTING SYSTEM
The lateral -force -resisting system of the building consists of perimeter concrete shear walls.
The wood roof framing acts as a diaphragm to transfer lateral loads to the shear walls. The
shear walls In turn transfer the lateral loads to the footings.
PROPOSED RENOVATION
We understand Gary Medino is proposing a tenant improvement to install manufacturing within less
than 50 percent of the building. We understand the original use for the building was manufacturing,
that it was later used as storage, and will now be converted back to manufacturing. Structural work for
the tenant improvement is not anticipated.
STRUCTURAL CODE ANALYSIS AND CRITERIA
The City of Renton has adopted the 2018 International Existing Building Code (IEBC). The code
provisions that need to be considered for this building with the proposed renovations are the
Alterations and Change of Occupancy sections. Additions to the building are not currently proposed.
Summary
The proposed renovations do NOT trigger a mandatory full seismic or gravity upgrade.
Alterations
The proposed renovation, based on the architectural changes, is likely classified as an
Alteration and shall comply with Section 503 of the IEBC. However, per Section 503.4 and
Section 202, it Is only a Substantial Structural Alteration If more then 30% of the structure is
altered. Based on the proposed renovation, the Substantial Structure l Alteration provisions
will NOT be triggered.
COUOMLIMPORT'1=11111UNIDEEN
S NGI RI
833 HOUSER WAREHOUSE
IEBC Section 503.7 requires anchorage of the walls to the roof 9 the work area exceeds 50
percent of the building area. We understand that the work area is less than 50 percent, thus
wall anchors are NOT required.
Change of Occupancy
The change in occupancy does NOT have additional seismic or gravity upgrade triggers.
The proposed change from storage to manufacturing may also Involve a change of
occupancy. Per Section 500.4.3 of the IEBC, the building only needs to comply with IBC -
level seismic forces IF the building changes to a higher risk category as defined by Table
1604.5 of the IBC. Per Table I W4.5, both uses are a Risk Category II. Changing from
storage to manufacturing will NOT move the building to a higher risk category, thus avoiding
the additional seismic upgrade triggers. In addition, the building was originally designed
assuming a manufacturing use.
The gravity load requirements for the roof framing are the same for both manufacturing and
storage, thus gravity structural upgrade requirements are NOT triggered.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the analyses described above, structural renovations are NOT required by the 2018 IBC or
IEBC with Washington State amendments.
COUONLIN FRLUNDEEN
9 Y