Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-178 - Vol 1 , :::,,,,,,,,, , . .... , ..... ,.‘: .i,iiii...i.,.,..... _•I'' .11..• . ..'1'-.C•••,, • • . . - • 1 4'. ' 4 )1 li•, 4 .0V.,i% 4 , • Iii . bki..' Filir I v.:• .. •• • ' -7,;,--• • ,,1 e4 4 . 4— . • - -. . . - ' , . .„....e.,,,,,, .... . . , . . t ...., .. e 4 •CO ,r ' s•' • •.l• 4, • 4'. II i . 71 Y • '• 7:Net' ••;:j..fe.i-e—. .ii, 4, .‘,..:4, •iit!..4.,.... . et, ,,,,., 7; 1. „•,,.. . S • '6.1 k y ,/ 4 .7 '•• # . 1 . . . .... ." '..'jjk • . • ', .. • .. . .., • • . •,v ....7,„407... . •.,11: 11g14.'4. . •• ,.4.• '• . .4. ,• •.•••i1. •1, • A.10' ••. ' .e r—lelfr."‘ • • • ..1 ...• ,g11,4 ••, • •.-- 4 • b•••••• . . 4. . 4i0-•,t iF I% ..4110 .., - - .' m -,. ,• A . • • .14'• I* . -As•• . -;" t4 '''' • - _ • IC .5 , ..., . ' •4,.• .40." *4 g1.•14"74,2._•I'''• ' • 4,.. :r . ;•• P4' :tc.f . - ...., .., 4e.,-4 • . : --, -• t.. 0 • ,.. , ,. ...,. r... , .it I 1.• l* ; . '. . , , '* Or4,••••.it '''.. , 4.t . •••••''S i • 416...,..., ' ..... ;:"•-•-3' ) - i .# f ., . .:; . ,.. •••,„, . .•. ;? •, 41 ' 4. . . •; . •4. :k''4 ,"..-I '.s::t.. . ' •''' ' .0... •-• •.1' ' 1,i, , --Thtt:3i,_4;e0t:''?•'' .....: ', '.,.. ''''''*-..• ,., .s.P:, 0 sis:. r • - \.. 44i49461r -. : ' ''..:1 ‘\\:.4' :"'i's ‘ . , .,. . . .. waplii.elociet 4-- . 0.4, ' •• -4-...; .- .. - - ..-• c i' • • . . .. . 1: ', t ., ' - • , . ., ... 1,—•1.• 4'. • , 1.... 7,. ' - hot* • ' l•k P.1 .,t," - - . , .„ $ .4.-. . . r mit, •4..... . .i- ' gy... •:". .7 -'- "•-• %At, i . ."11•44 , . , ''...." • lr ---- 11 t '44? ill? \dire.7416. 4. . . • . • to'SDOe .• . 4 e. • oi .:. •• t - / - . ,J%•4". 46 •'4 ,.'.:% ' •'• •' , • a, , , Ir, . _...1...._ ..?" ... , •.• •r / . '4 .116 .? , 4 ---4..,, __ _ ..... • . i W . ••• 4 ' .) '114,. i tak Ilk - • 4 • • • . , • ‘.4\ - • ,, ...... 1 k • \‘,,V\ • , •• ' ,..: 3,, • . . •\\' . . ... IP I J. • :., ii• •_ . , . , ,... • ,: ..,•••A t sP. ' ‘•i t' .. • *4.4 4 4 , ) ••..' ....,.,••'ia.i,.i t.i.74 . • .1 i‘..I,4f•"b. :.,,3,1•4'•, ,•- .,„ ..., 1 ..);„„ :0, • 4.1**** .. • 1 •., 4• I . • . •• ' 4 .-t If* IL 4'1.* • # , II A .r. .• ' t; I I i ' • . ,•*r•A,* ' S. • ., %.it. • -- •. ,.• W. • 1. • . . 1 . 4,4. ,, ., ,, . .-. .•:, ... -., , . • .• Al s , ., . ... .. • .. .. , . „ik.,„ .. ., .‘„,,• , . .. t..‘ . t, i ItteHi ,. • ` ., % ^ .. .4., .. . , ., -,,...,-, .,, _ri , . . •4..,:-.. ,,, 'Ar‘ a + S I' fir • •. .•s_10.....----%.; . , h, , . • . �•► . mg• ypr • i IP.0101111101111111.11P. II!, ill •e: rallt ! �,;. 1 .y 1' j • S_`•• r ter' • 6.04....pi °111 .**1. . •41:-f• lik •.' ' i e tilt 1 •i .;+ 1 i + ,+t. iiriliiiCCII;IdgLIIIN.'4*.' ,` �� k 1 ! sf +,ra ii ► �t 4 tll. t i..L. i • • ." r act t - •,• - - • • - P ' . • 1';403.1t:C . OVIIP ' y • wIli, Ar • .. ......, 4 • ' ,••‘1 t$1 illt '•1'4 . • i. 1% 40061 •- Vt.' 4 phi w F '. . 1 r,ti . , ..4- .. i # .s VIO .0041.. • Y�•,� • ' ^ ` ` • _ . •1 1r ••114 it11 • f N � ,A. ' /,' 7 s• i ,• '', •,�..1_,, 1 % ,4 ?• mot •• :•1 ,r 0 x ,. AA Um 'r!i _ 1 i I fii1#//' ' , i • ii---- , ... T ..a;; 7 : II r • I i //i fI//i/ , 4 11 I I t I I t • ilii i le. �� -IF"• 111 1:14.4 till ' ,,,,t-ir p _ 13AV ii1W 2 Tv N mmipplammi.■■-I imimmimm ' • -... :, ,. *..1i ; iimmumeme, ._........_ _ . . .1;:„...,. v,„0.4.4,: 1 e of t: .�. ._. 1 IIIIINiiit iiiiiii".. f; ... . ._ , i.„,„ , _ Ia. 1.1r_ ,. t , t III .!, 1 I -,�� -11111."---------......,N , ilt• it 1 .. . . I , .... , . ,.. .,- .0 1.!re . .. ......-•—• - —'".g. .r. 'RI ; &•rr ..::.0-‘:: .1 r 4 "St ft . • .. . t ..- . . ., .• , . .eS. * .., et 14 el • • . - -11. . ' •': 1. .. ••• :. ..... .1 A - - ..*. -....., • ... -......-.....-. •••••....,,...:' / /4/— -• VII, I- .....p.. .• --101! .0: ..i. .•_Ama ...a. •31 17; S111111;1/4 • ' •-•': '' ;I..- . PI' ..- . . .7•'"i , . * t •4...1 . . 11- •N. . ___...... , t•e', 7. r . . , • . •.! itri:sji 7 i'. Jill . . .I . . $ ....••• ••••,... .• OF '-' " $ f 1411! . , . a , .. . ' ..1------- .- ' i' "r''' '• ' ., ••":'-. • , '' •••.arm. ' ow • • .,ik . • i . \ . - . ,:•. -.a • . — .•1 t .,,Vainhs• 4. 14 411111.11111111111111111M.ii • ... . ... _. . -- --. V.talk" ... All% 4 , . . . • 1. . , • - . — • - . . - 1 ' ', ' -,•. ..„ . , .:*-•• .e..: ' • ,-.: - ........ . ..•i ••,• :. , , ..•:. . . ..30. 4:- . • . . . • . I . • • • • ••.•-.----. • -, ,..., ' .'..\1\ _. • • '1/4...,.: .z• i•,....3,. s s '• . . • . ....• • • • -•, .i:% .• • • •.•'..%..• "' ••. .• •••••.... a,. • .•••• „ . a • • • ,., • 4 . - N.— - _ .• 4. . 1 . 4, ,I.:. ••• • - . • , . . . . • .. , . . . . . . _ . • . . • . . . .,• -;••. • . -__ ,ci• " ' •#*"44, _..._ - — 1 1 I I I I I I IIrnrlkgl ,'r1 Fif f- kIil :1t4t1H , LiI I I ' �Li kl , ', it ,a' nt_� ,,.,1 �i1 r' I ii. C, I I I i f-�- o, 4 I I Wir- . ' I I I j i- ' Irk I I I I' I I it - - �...-_ II • illi I ' I • iIll !I:Li il ii k ----la' M'H.': ik. I AllaM y r iituiiiiiiiiiiiiiiw, _In r IIuI-1 �i■i illi . 1 A , i ,J i , , _:_L. _ . _ trim • Al . .,. .„,,,,,...„..jsrlar*'1 I " - 1 q,L t i t , i l 1 1 1 I , / +II• 111)i / ' • 1� i 11r, .� i r i! 1 tir_i•i,,, _____A, c. II I , 1 ., . , �.. '! —iii, p. , • --' I .., L► ,qp , 1 I � i s j i�� . • • - ... -" --s ... '-• • '1' 4.: ' ... "• _ A. '...' ' . • ." '• -- . . • . •1itt'-1. . %" -., - . ' r' ":•, V, ' -. • 4* ' • . - _. . . - I .-.116000014wks. 1 .. . .. • • b.. ts.,...., .....,' - • SelPos, . - IIIIIIM _A -JIMI. I . ,d.•104 s. . -.. M WII I .• ., s -, •I i. P t • i i .6• r ' 4;,, _ . .11110-' playlliii- 411111)1111Tr g 1gli .11 ,. .• 1 . J. •• ar oi . 4-•••••Iiir.'- jogs', 4601111.-11 , I fill 1...,...1.-•grii .zr,.7........7...r...1. 1 rf ,. ..,_ , Pill ,11 .-..... .S...t.„,, —r------iii Nii I I s' iri....-1111111-111111111 .... — —.... 1 111‘ "-two I 1 i 1.'1 I ; 4111111 %lie 4 I''' ---- - to toill :Er. ONNININN. 00 IIII I .1;Immi: 'Ili 11116...I ......, us, ,.. • .. 1 , 4, 141 I ‘w.,...- .. ........... „11 .1111.1 .. , if,it ,' %.' 1 r Ai ',lr�i" Y� i sl tag • ti y ' y 1� ;jam • wlir • . ..t, l' r , iti 3 '.<Y,'i.. 'Al' tea.:I.,,.�->�'R` iiiii p .. .•T . .S ..** - - .� . .tit • '"r ••,.JN.i.N,a:...---•,._. s; _ ' . • 4 ," 'Y rs-: ? i • - • . • • • • • tt • ..) . • a, , a.. , • 111 • a4 . . - ! . • ,. %. • V . . - .,. • . -. I,t• gt...4 4- .. .- I.. • .. ; ' 11114 a 41/1, ' 6. P f. L. S•• - - 1 •• •_. •I• * N ' I '' ..N. P.' • . . ' .. . • VI,‘11 •.4..1 S. . •. -. .... . 1 ' • .• ..11i• ltilf •... . ... .?' t;Itil4 -- t • . ' , .• . .•Ifffri$%,, ••• .". •.1.)....4:tt! l. ° 4.--. * •. . . . . , • .: '.. ' .10' . s• , i ;4'.• ,, : I''4`.1, ,t. at _ -1,4,, ' •*-.atae. • ...:,,t':'1-i .01,... .*''.. i' : ' '.I.' i,'"'/*:.'*-1.:. .. •.'. ... .•ii ltroi,.. 4," • - )1kiir..t.- *4,7 ".•,v. Ole •* ..;`'...4 :- ..,, i „ ' .',. •-. •-.• v.r. . -...., ,-. J.: . * • „...- 0,.;:f•-•: , ...11. • ‘ :• '14,st, -.• * r lr .': '''" i ',...1 :''' ' .. y• .... . ' "t•-•' ,.‘,.114..-----—--. It-... .-- ..,... . 4.•. i ...4,4,;..,11. •t .. -• It'. '"-:. $% -. „. "i - ...: ::-1 • e,„,, " . . .X. • ,•.: . . V' .*.,' ,. ? •, '•iii,..,J.;:lt,• ..''..4e4.: • = , At - • ' .‘'‘It'7Vc-1-'''...i' "V` _ .,, — • , .•'. fr k . ...' .,' :1--C:.' . h*. . t . , l,A_,4 ygiava ,.*mit 01 %\ , itt./t'a. - : .'*_ -.• -v 1- • ' 7,iri .. -.7"4° k ' r'.•' ' ., '... i '':''. ' r :' - ' r 1 0 . 51IX la • 10 •••- - r • •••• ..el; •.:1‘ • • "'''flt-•*41, .... •. . • ,r•I • '."'"a1141 et II -. , •.i .....2.,,,.,:,., t,:,41.15t:14,, - • " , ,..• 71 t..4. '''.' ' " ''.. N ,`, •, ilt..1 t ;.f ,.! " '.-1.• ....! ...- , ,alle71;4,40 n'.' -gat • ,,' -- •...'if '...iti , , ,t . ; I.•1 0 . , . -41.; 4.• '. --,.- ' .• ' •v „t.,111'.. s 7.' • .4 — - • i ''--; •- ' --7:-"4, •cr. ... - i . .. •. • --+14\ -*, 7. .1.'‘. • . , • ...l.'s-4%. . t ,.,,.. .. . “ft . )1 •,,,t, .I . • :..11/:1;37/. '.' 1 i• a.1••-• • . - I ,IW ii , ...• . ' • i ''''''''...„-,...A .. ....' , ,. . .. :7.... . , .•4 P.:nr••,.! •111W'A -.•;:.4t7:. • . - 1 4. . '.2/ .. ' ',.... .:•dr.I' t k;' i . Vi ••••'••' •••••1`...'47. • i. a i t I • '• , t 4 0. 1: , '••••'''.', F ''''s • ".`. • •1 ..\ a ' 47. • . ,,,, , , ' I .* •",I,' —.;•4,,N3,,?,..: ". • •,. #,, 3 „it. . ; 0 . ay a• 1 .. .. ••.... "•• • • '1 • ' dr)"•-••• - . . • •:...) t :Ir. ,- •s•. .\ . . • 1 v",. 4 • " .... . ' , .• .is"14 . a. . . k. Ilk • ..- 211...i.:.,..1/4 . . . • . I • • F ,%.4.'-. •• . N 1.V.S.'410: . ,, i., k •, J , 1 .• • : i . . ' ," •• L.i • t . •sif i• •‘Y, A • . '."...•,,, . .... . . , •' .. • • '‘• .1.) ,t,` . • . , ,, .1 1$1 . • ..'4' " ., ,,,b!..„, ••,.v., • 1 V. .. ` is i 4i tir lt, . ,. t Jo. a , ' • It # r S i r•-'ir • 4., 41,4.1. , Sit ..1.• silk,. ' 1 , ' . - ,. , . i a '4 4 '..S. •''' t • •„Wj41, .1 i . f• • 4,1 f - • -k 4. • s L 1112111 • it • iiiii 1 „A.* ' • t p. sii ... . -1111tegio.1..•, . izi ,..., - . , - : Aeeept , , ,,,t, 4°11, .0!4/...4.7., " v., • .N4 41 ' A , i A -, • Tr` •-..%,11, ,,• ' Ilikki"- .e. 'it .. :. L 'fit:ems►., �, +r, ,a is, X,; �s�a \ S' \ c ;P. . . . • I%le: tlrittrt2A'r c •1,0 • �� 4.....arciroet..„ .., ' •.6*.• . • : .. . ...,.\\ N..,6, 1,14ore-114.1-11W Millil"!kilb... - • ' ...,,,-)..-''''' , ...„,„,.,.., .,, Ap....,,, , ... ., . .,-.,. . .I. !rtio. , .,a i, il ' i i . 1111t *� -.ram _r :11. 11t. ��, „.Fi . Lf . /..: /'�� \ , •'� c''.,... ii* . - ........ •b . . 414.41111Par. 4. 1...• ....4.. A:r. '11, I AFF i 4.0 iori. • • ,x ...... -..• •••,,,,._ , .mil r. 1y' � 'a 1}," • :7 s.li. • - y y % s ,1 ar .. `���w t', ' lh� t"''• `!r ,rC,. Y. -I�:.�+4ri" .. 's S ,+if w.A: '. - - .jai b .4."-- ; .-,i tjtit ii,L4 . 1' it 4, # * * • .,7 ......, _ , 1 4; 's . , . ot • .44._ ,«. .•":11,..,, ,,,,,. ..:60,..o.J.., ..„-- .• . f ,t., , . ii .„. iv • • - 4,/, v......,. • tos . Pr k�• 4. ♦ i. ', Y - i•, . ., T_y ..... .1, - • . , `. �.• r ,.*.i. ,i a /f• r • ',• fit` ii, i 4 i: :h • r �• • •r NW- •.. Well t' . rs1a.•• a� r »y / • /G / A /...' Iv I' ,,(t11i, s . ' fit" 1' �"' ���' .-"�' -. I •, s -s il % C a� •f •exr •N .... • j .h� 1 ►. �. .� u_ t om+ `. -i• 'L • • • r ,ir„r, ,r� , , i 'aa Iii •• { ,• • 1% et •' ' r .* r " IUD•• ` a+ �,/✓• y Ti+ ,4- .- '` 7 DIY t �•• g •� 7 � / ii` ••f••'t• . 00,0-c-:""--�-•�-�1 • �t . .sue „`T .. ! • •. ~ ""1 �' �' '`ti, 411010 �;, ) %�"" •fir-_1� ��—`-_�.�_ �.-411.. ,' • .J . ." • !��_ ••t~ / 't r!J' A'A-jA • ; / _ _�� \ Y ♦ 1y w _ tit • • .. iliNi... . # 4 . .4 . r' • • ' it . ..• 1• ` "'' r tiw Cl �{ _ . " .3--• . ' 4 .., 4.. -...„,,- . _____ „„ . ... • . , .,„,,.,,...,.,.., '?''' liers, - ____--_. ,.. ; . ' I* p,.2. .... 0 It.' 4 fif ' / , - v. * •••1•Pelklila-- 31, 4.,., 'ef , ,, '�w\ fit ►. ciik �'4' ! ' I l ,� u f . .. ... . . . . .. . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . , . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . - -: ',. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . ....• • • RR � FI C . . OUNT . :. ... .... Sane 19 ii - Ce OAr flue . 50- • So . odi LION 5 7 �..aLl hours 126) 3 No . of4Lh to91 244 hovrS JnLtQr ' 221 Iq ? f qhours RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON 'SEARING EXAMINER IIIN1 31918 PM W0.Abn.¢r14R191915 6 EXHIBIT NO. i^/ ITEM NO. K- ' 2° - 78 -. '172 - p i Pe line road open aur1n9 6oein9 slump Location - So . 3rd east of 1ThLL for / 4hour S East bound - 12 -19 > Z7 �5 Westbound - iq , 1q73 - pipeline road closed Locakson some Z 4 hours Eastbound, - lib � j5A0 t4)C5tboLtYst — g3i RE IN/ To IN H I L L . .. . .., __ ........... RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMMIER •"(91 131978 EXHIBIT NO. MI PM '+ t8.9,1011I112111213144516 ITEM NO. g' /7f- 71 II ,.,. 12-4._1„;+-:= -....7:: :,.!,. -.t-....:L, 7-4; _____ a - ,.. A--- - .1 IP SE :,:e - 1--- ...1 . . in RE NTON II V E, . 5 T. ii Au E.G Sourg , RANT 411, • f , • 1... /\ ilit'l :- '' • _, s , ii *. _ -I, Y' • - P ; , ...:1 ,•74*, . :--: ...1„....,,s:4.:'.:. NbJel, • �r . • • • •-••it:t -v• -vi„..0,''',-. • " - rlitos-4,4046:lie . - . . • lf� t • le 09 I g:. A tr ��} rRIle - IL Mile y ; " • 44 y, r..:t + to*nif • .,..,,,, t • • 4f ,: L ..t • .ram ; - _ s 3 F ' �• I 1146101,, ‘ .4 a ..,,. ��. Il . I 0 r NM 0111 ... .s s : .: :.. .2 ' x __,_ _ . F. .... i.f ,.,. _,,,,. _ .. ,, . ,........ 0 )1 - , _....4. ' _...\ , / 3 ....11261 ii„. ... , ,,a , . , .... / , . 0 __, . . . , .. . . . . ...... ... ......... . . r ,. ., till .. ... ,1/4, .. ty�,; t syr' 1r '? ..e .- fir--.".,3:.#}.e_.-..'s, ;;T•-.e.�'.w �' I IIIII j f 7 _ ya •y • • • • 'st- y, • 111111111 1 affix. A n 2 3 ..1 .31 .113S V . ......... .. ii • • • • "A .7.... . ..' #3 fir; T A- „t " : 4 . .... ... a- 1i:ri' toil, t If �• -> C r S_ • s• TIN .....____ • Ili r. �k`k. t tea., It j _i..`v. ,.01 • s. s r �i • • — .. T. IA ',APR r t Tom• Mr.• f �% f i -"�►S Wit• t • # t 14 � lite) + �, ice+ �`�.y r • ...NI' �'� lir - • .., ......--v, ...4111,-„:: • • .....b, . it or , , i . 11 ...,,,,... 0 .• _ . yr . or .• ,#.0eilipAit. ./0 ;.004,47___111 i i' ' . ..;,..._:Tr 4.- Nic.:.,...... r. i ...1§410,4401661 • F Y t es. i .s Fir eats.OV-40 ,yfit,�,. �•t^ ti ` l�K1 _4Y' ti >;� , .l - 1 • , lq�+ Y.. y �. 1 ri. . d,'' _ I >�* j r ;i A. ` �e� � • - ` rr , I . , ,. ______ ..,,,,,,,..„..,....,..,._ ,.. ... i „3.. i '''''''';'. i - ''' .r Xi.. �t"lv girt am, Illi L..' • , ,i. .. .... ..).„„).- , 4,14.,,, -.......4„.„..... — . ...stow. , -. „,.. 2 . .. . ' A.x 1'401 . Ill r „,„ ,.. • {`} I y4 t✓i t •+ .5...+. IlirI," . * • . 1 i 1111114$ 1 1 ° 1 'i • . ',°I . ,. 1::., . •. till. . '1 - , .1.•0. 0', ,, 4 .,14 Ada. • .1r Vil 4 3 , , t . e '.r, 1 , . ••1,..,• • I tili • g 0 .0 14bIg •4111 4( ‘ ' et t'' I 0 I V 4 . e a e: le It. :' i i g t il iti4 tililwrie ,i f . • 1.4 i.,imbill 1(1-i. _IA ti,t, ' i' 'IP v..._ •P f s'; g Jill ,i • I.• 1 Pi VIIII) 11 ..• I 44...;:t4.;:i....Tir,;4,6,..i.. • A, 'Pet . P • • • . inel , S. —4 et 40 ?.. „ II . . . . i Ulli * • ••- . = , • 1/ , • . k , 1r 8.111N11.111111tW 1 C V , ••• • I ) ZZI \ ow f / A IS A i 110 • t - / / I 1 . ; )464' / - OC \,... , Alb .r••••,... .., ., - 7IIIIIIIIIIIIIP CC A 11 ., '. affMilklirr i r 11101116WONI, '1 11111111111111. . 0 b ...... ,-. IL I W '1 all 1111.11111111111 Clill) .1141 IL. 2 . . , . ... --141104s .4 • • • •,•. If , ••r•. ' . :...) • .....-........... ...... .• ...... . 0. . _. , After 1.1101111 itt — _ .- . .4. ,diggiar ..• . .111 , ..,li 6.1,'''• .• . .. . '.. .4 . 4. — • Mit • . . ..a . •••• - • .. .• leet' 44. - iTiiiiigtf Oil ., . - ... , . • .4 c •A'.• . 44,- s' ' /lite .• • filkki •• ),,,,,... 44 __..... Ar .. 1 .. 111P It- I .. it___ _._ ,, .4•1_ 1 - . • 4 • V, it '..•. 44, .4 "4 .4 .4. •••••-• ...I 4... -.4.... A• .. e t• './ i •4 . : • . , — l f• • ',. t4• . kV • 4,: V.• - .,• 41111101111111b t MI - .10, r •••• 04 , ... . V- 0 a ' .‘ ... '•••• ". ,lk. .' . t • • ' I• • .• 411' .,. 4 •01, I , • • . 4' 4 ' A. • .4,.. • 4 .4. 1 • 4 • 4 441111. 11111 .I•MA. 44111=111111W I • . .... .tatintIAMm....— .., a.. . • ••••• 4-'t '1'4,,44411 ... 4 A. le A • 4 4" I'4 ...111410. . 14 ..41.1dr ..4, . - . .....e . , . 1- 1311' - .____ . ., ...WM 1. • .. 4... L 4 ---=---._ Li -, a .... ,... , Am...„,„„, ........ A _... ,. ....„.. , . .. ma 011 a .., ,_ ... ,. . .. • • mi ..... _ _ , _ _ . .. 0., .. _ • fr He i 11 Ad ir ... . . ... .. 'Jill IN 0 r) m 1 i.„,_,,„____,,,,, ,................., . _ . ... ..... . 6, `,... .11I6P -''' ' V...,......,....,„.............-....., ...._ Sr .' ..• I: . • .:- ----PI. • s . . v 111111.2' .... ,.. . . .- . ,1 ,......, - . ......- 7 4 k.•9.,-, : 's • -*:;', • ' a. ; ..-_-- . --..,1,00,..- ... - ,. . • , ; , .„... . _ . .,. . . ,, p. ...? ,. . . . , -410'... - . 4 . , • ,.. . i = ' -; .••. 1 ' ,.: . Nr, ;a-:. A i; ' - , , .-14•'• -rrak ' ' ....", T,,.. ... •,...' 'i .,,....,„,...•-. , • ...... - ,i. . ...... . - - f-A-..,";.• , . . . ,.....F.- .. _ . .411. .% , •-sk ,- t . . , , _.. ,I, • „, .... . , . .'.' 1 I BIM I i b.,' . ' • , , , - ' r.0'..- ' ck...k**. r ' 0.....0411.0.0•00.... . I •i . ° _ a. *,i,.,.., - .•.. -Ir,, _ I • r .1:,:•*" • 4fP t C' ,if kelP.. .4'• T • f• • . . . .... .. , t.,... •••-• ,-- .1. 104 . :.; . , . leir 1 '- ---. . * 4 . . . ....- - -- -- "Sto . 3 . .1.. • . . .. , . , ",.. .... . , . . r • i 2 II i . , , , , ! . .,..„..,,...„. , .. . ... ',.. . ..,,,, --• alit d . . MN "4V44* ..• #, I lidli , • .... I ': I . ..•,--' —-111t-•:'t' - . . - - .• ai . -"Iir. '''''' 1. .... . 4110,. .. . '' =1 -_ . ,..... . . . •- , .., . , .,, 41 ' Alks.411101110111111'116 .=11166. APO* ' _ ' ......- rwmmill111111111111111ME. .• I I *,.. . . ....''''...„.........„, 104 " . ',... , • ,,. \ ,1 41k,. ,416--- -....„„,„. , . •. -. 1 / • ......,, \ , \ ig , i in 11131 — t , ,,........ .. •,.-Ai gfr,: 1 • . I1 I . ,... 11 NN ' : '.4.A.,,...:7,. - 4 _ i II i it-...... - . vim. .- , -f -.- • - ,s-iticat---. .. IN IPPIIIIIII . . . - • . i "• •; ipir4f „,„, & . '=' ik - .. \k • .7„ •' •-, I fif 71,111,1M I , 1 I 1 /iii'j1 . . . ... I i ri• ........a., ..4,.•. ,' f''4 1. .''':' . •a,•.. . . le: . . 'it' I. r, * .t , at . 0 0. ‘.. ' I•.k• I it i 1 t . . •.... , •• •• • „ .14110•Irry011, reall.111,,,, , _ et '.; ' /,' , 41, P*.L. *pa. ;4.. ' t.:PIA TirITTITIIITT 0111:tiitillitti 1. 1 1 ."*. * 1 1 ' . ;.1' '44 . ...r...,1 . ' 102' • '• !' ,, • •e.1401 4:4Ir ' ' , - , .. • !S i '4 4 "' ••' '...., ‘ •, ' 4.. , 4 '0- 114010 • , — • ' +4+, 1 , OIL 1 'r ,...„ , • r; , ;. At . •----.!,..--'• - 1 ... -,„.-.., • •,:. . ,. -,-._ ,2,- t 1 • ito• ' - ...-...i,r.,,,„..\ 1 , _ •-it .." •i•i•-• , - - • --Ali^ ••ie....;,,,-.,- ..... . (Ir. - i I ''`•••••,........., i . fari , ..6. • ' . ., .... - ... * . . .. • ., ., . ..._..... t., .. ,_,.... .....„........ --..... -_-___ 11...., • *...-.:1 .-,...,.......,.....-.....,, , .............L.Ab• • • -4, am* krrllTr t1i ' .. - /,'..1 ,.'. .,. P . •= _tA, •. • • a. ....dt_i n..1.1 111,.111111 l; i l'l..l'lif i . 1i _ _ I 4.. . . 0a0.-............: ,.t.-, -4A7.4l,'-.-.i.4.-1-..-.".-„:t,-,-.-.,:•-.'.•.,-,,,,-4z.,,o N--.o..-, -t-.,,..-;• ...- ••• Willi . i i 411111111011111Mill ; ~-----' RENTON HILL CRIME RATE -- r • Cornnari Son -For 1.� High lands 36 i w n t o w n RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON Re ntOrx Hi II I AM NEARING DCAMINER EXHIBIT NU. /5 ITEM NO. n'. ; 'F. re , ._. � 1 i (c. flumberofCa ( Is Jartuar / Fe. brio4r'j / O IntArck 14 April(1 ‘i Ag-im --a-- 6 12 Su ne. I 1 .Suw g 7montks '30 C IIS II"'TIPROGRESS ? I . :1....-1.6.........4 - - r.........itrozril.. '.' . ,;:,''.11*'''- :' . ‘ - • .4 • i .0....,....4.54?s •' f i .. 4 . •, * I • • . 4. ,.., •.• . , __ , , ,,. *-. itliZ7k..1 I • - • 4 A 4. ,..li, :I..12 41, /4 .• .. el w• 7. • 4ricIt 1 '1' -*-0 .IPtle -it ---,-. ,- 4..44. - 4•40. ... „. Itt i . -",.. ' .......: , - t. ,r• ......, , strt‘ - ' - oporyigtr"440 • tb-i 71•4 fn.;••„versa toot I I' ''`‘ ...,: 00 %., 111111111111111P1 .gr v•ik . -.I,..,7_ ,-, . Itr:'' ,,,,,- • .t , ,,, I $ . . -.... .t,,...• .'' ,idgeggii-oliottriii . - ,I- , - • ri-4 1, - . .. "'Lop! •s •14. . , . , ",NIk.'4 ' 1 ."411111ftter., . - , .-., • , • r .40 at* • -1 .a . . , ,. ith:.. -"214i.lotith`At-.•-• ______\_____,.."__._ , ,• . . sort ' . . • . ••••• ... .• - •.3' • . - .. - Ai a. A A . r .....• Ntm........._- --• 4.1. , . _ . . . * .., • .' . ..' _________ _ • "%in. .dg 411[4.,.... Ar , • ,;_...,:tatr ' tt . . .-• 3. j, I 141 1 ' is i i ti A 4• 4 ft .. •:•' '. .' ' r-4 , .., _ ••.• 2 . .. . ;•'iS ''' '%, Pi-- , • • • .. ... 3„... • .,...., .• A,• '.0 .... till o , . t• _ ; 14 `A• 11*,. . - •I -..c.-- - • 4.; . , . -. .. - • , ,_ i ft I lig • -- • • % iriat 'kr -.7-!Ni•Notr,-_ -__ -- - "lik -- • ."' ....,_. 'T r . . . _ --.. .•.er' ....11Wr -7---- --- ... ,,, is.1.1 a-c r • - - •"1.10111.11 • . I x .....• t. i 1 1 0 , . '. .3..••• .- . . ‘• N..„ C• . • _ •'II r .. . . . . " s• • . •t-•A .k,..1.. , - _ . _ - . '4 :1-:-. -11::‘•-------:' . \ _ . - • -. - -• --- • --. - . a f Itk _. -1...Y.---. ...' ' .., • ' ,• .4"' -....- 4......"......•-, ... ,L. 1 ? ., . ie- • as ,., x . - ' 4,..„.., mi..' , , • ....• '"'. la --v.. 'AP, . .,• le.. 4 ...:'':•tv.10%.•. • ' .. ...".*O'"...... • 0....1;k -'....‘• .a, . . *la. '. a.'0 ar. .I. ,.. • AL .. :-..' ---i...- c - .4"IPA•A .. . -"'. . . mi. . , . al .. . . . . T- . 1 . . . . . • t ........., . . i \\ . •-„40 s. t., ' . .-.. i • , • r .,.,'Ma •ip . .. l 114, . .,.. . Awe'..7,''''.- i . % , . .. . • , o • I . . g , '\' . , , ...,• . '• f • •,1 i t ! . .'. 1 ' t .- ,--'11111.H. II XI- . v • ..4 ;• f 'It, fir IF ...... ......41. , .. ... • • • s,.. c , . .. ., .„ ,...,• i! ‘ • . • T' ' ii • A Pt :, 41 CI: .. 1 ' i • .,, ' 4 •t•\Alli , . ' .1.4 . N, J, 'I ..n.‘it... i VOC.. 4 " A .. . .., otyl. .k:-.1111SPA5k411‘ ,.k..ti ji ... ,; 4., ... .323 4104 . . • ......... AN .. . . i ......, f: 4 . . ... V it .... , It • I .1 • '-'''' :: A c • • - .- _- - - - - i r. ; 1 ft 1 1 ' NI t 4 S. •, 1 % t ' . I Ar ". . 1 Ai 1 I ..i. • .....4 0 ... I • t iti . 4. AT • , 1 t i . 4 ... i , . ... • . . , 'till \ I • ' ,y • 4***, I. 1: • f111 111 st 4, 1• I 4 li , - Pie ' 1 .1%' ,1 • , . 1 A " 1111114,...,, .' . ...•: i „. , ... I , .., • ..1 ill •)1., ...... .. ' . • ... • k 1 , I , \ ' cl. . . . !,. . ;i , . - • . . 1,.. ,iri Ili , . . ,.. . .A s RMFFJCOCERN5 1 . . W.....,,L3.45.... 4... i !! r , t . IL"71101N1#0P , .. . . . ,.. . I . . , . . ..... . . . . . .. . . 11 4111,11b1S. , ...• • '.• •'t :,r., t.. # - •.A P ,ps ,,,,-: .,. , . . . • L.... Ap., ;1 ,... .,k.',1..1".•, . ., .. . 1 . • • - "v‘. , . . , . . .. ..,...- . • , . , . , • . . . , . ,.. . , • . . . . . . !. . , .. . . , . .. . . ' . . .. . . . `...' , . . . . . . , 1 •. • . •, ,, . ... • , a • . . . :. ..... _ i ilim C ., • . ; au,,., ..... *Issiiii - • .. . . ........ii , / II laill 76/1ar ..-. ...N.Ilk. • iiihindwiff P! . ... , • ... , . 3 di... mid.ine••••• , . . 1 4,. a. . •i IP . .' . ' Mr- .I/ir . , ' • I. ' . .....t •ir . , s J. 1 - 4#' .. • ,,..,,.."...... .,• . 4 .A. , . . . • ••••••• . . . 1 ....., . . . ' v 1 • . ... , . .. , , " I " • • . .• •,,, • .. • . -•••a -••••• -...• 41 . . • f• • 1 . ' - -••• a 't • . a . ., •' • • . • • • I ,-- ..•' a . • . . ' .14 . •• i - .. a .1111.1111..01.114 . i •:;1101.0110111.1111W1F,R111 —al • t '' . 4.0- Air. ,„!. ,,...,.. .. __ r - . hal I -- . ,.. 0001 1 si;di , r,t, . ‘ , . . ._ . -- - ......... ..• i•110. 4 , P . .. .. - A • • t . • . M. I .. A • . . . , ...- St r R • lit"' .1811100.1.1. �. a �' R l C • f I <� g ♦- i) r ��� pm .■ , • . , �- Ar .sy r .1.f ��n I 111tjoo -40 -.., •�q • RECEIVEDNIL ..... 4t- . `. " CITY OF RENTON ' 04 HEARING EXAMINER 3UN 131918 i AM PM __ . ?,R191I0►llti2►rt e2i%4r5•f � I. • / 4t4 EXHIBIT NO ! '' illiO _. dI la ITEM NO. _ h : 12 9 - 1 ._. . r BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE R I7 al Elk _ R-178-78 - CITY OF RENTON; Exhibits— #2, 11-15, 28, 39, 40, 41 & 42 Exhibits consist of aerial photographs and charts, not included in file folders. ''1 f►.:� , September 25 TO: Larry Warren FROM: Marilyn Petersen Larry. . . Here is the certificate for the tapes as well as the six tapes of the Renton Hill hearing. Thanks, DEPARTMENT ' REQUEST # DATE FROM TO TOTAL HRS. CASE # ' THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT: OFFICER OFFICER'S SUPERVISOR AND THAT ALL THE ' IS TRUE AND CORRECT. SUPERVISOR ADMINISTRATOR CERTIFICATE I , THE UNDERSIGNED , MARILYN J . PETERSEN , HEARING ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER , CITY OF RENTON, CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF LAND USE HEARING TAPES OF FILE NO. R-178-78 , CITY OF RENTON, REQUEST FOR REZONE, FOR HEARINGS HELD ON JUNE 13 , 1978 AND JUNE 20 , 1978 . SUBSCRIBED AND SEALED THIS 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER , 1978 . (ice t MARILYN 6 . 'TERSEN HEARING ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER DIVISION CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ?7\0,\VOI \cW 0A-) NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT RENTON. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON" " HEARING EXAMINER PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER JUN 1 31978 AM PM PUBLIC HEARING 7,5,9,14J1,12t1r2,3,4,5,6 JUNE 13, 1978 EXHIBIT NO. / APPLICANT: CITY OF RENTON • ITEM NO. /1'- /2=?- 71 FILE NUMBER: R-178-78, REZONE • A. SUMMARY: • Applicant initiated a rezone from R-3 District, Medium Density Multi-Family to R-1, Single• Family District. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Transamerica Development Company Puget Western, Inc. • Mary Tyrrel 2. Applicant: City of Renton • 3. Location: Property is on the west side of Renton Hill south of South 7th Street; east of FAI-405; north of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line easement and east of the subdivided property. See Exhibits 8-1 , B-2 (not included in this report), B-3 (not included in this report), and 8-4 (not • included in this report). 4. Legal Description: Detailed legal descriptions are available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5. Size of Properties: The parcels total ± 12.1 acres. 6. Access: Primarily via Cedar Avenue South with less access available on Renton Avenue South, Grant Avenue South, High Avenue South, and Jones . • Avenue South. 7. Existing Zoning: R-3, .Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District. • 8. Existing Zoning in Area: R-1 , Single Family Residential District. and R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Single Family. 10. Notification: The property owners were notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance. C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: • The rezone was initiated to review the existing zoning in relation with the Comprehensive Plan. 1 FXH/8/7` 8--/ . ^� ��� .I.- 4.. nun, ' r pr4; I , ...� -4I, -*/I ,pvt••.�,� `1 F 'J J At y r_-, ,E- : . _ . -- _ R 2 • 'R-3 ... .1-.-1 is i A 1 1 y 1 � • . ' ''''''<N4'''''' .' , 444. • r * . r • . It. -'-: 1:5.- ...,- 1...,. I, • ! _.: a ��\ ,,,i.:..--:.,‘4,,,,vii,i,,,, . . • . t /:- /-\ , , 134 I ,:,. i ,___ . .,41,•„. . .. . . . ,. lai i..• s . . . 1 ', R . ' Ft_ ;1 ., .t.....,._. •.]...• 03.. at r 0 • s':,s . ji.mWMMI4 i • 1 oeClI SR-1 , / i.,:..,. JR" -:-.1-:.:).L,r,,,,,--..- -..T:-. . • .,(2P- . • • • f�o i R_ •, . GS-�: __ I: ��, 1 C �I I • ,, REZONE: • CITY ,OF. RENTON, File No. R-178-78, APPLICATION FOR REZONE_ FROM_ R_3 TO ' R- 1; property located on the west side o,f Ile nton Hill and situated • south of• South 7th Street, east of FAI-405, north of the Puget Sound' and Light Transmission Line Easement, and east of the subdivided property. • APPLICANT CITY OF RENTON `TOTAL AREA 12. 11 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS Cedar, Renton, and Grant Avenues South EX!'SIING. ZONING R-3 EXISTING USE Vacant ' PROPOSED USE Residential • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential • COMMENTS This is the first phase of an area-wide rezone initiated • by the City of Renton. Three ownerships are involved in this phase. . • PLAIINING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78 JUNE 13, 1978 PAGE TWO D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed by Ordinance Number 1547 in May, 1956. E: PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1. Geology - See Exhibit E-1 Ground Moraine Characterisitc Artificial Fill Renton Formation Deposits Special Feature - - - Partly cemented, Intimately graded but contains mixture of clay to uncemented beds. gravel sizes. Drainage . Highly variable. Runoff excellent. Runoff variable. Foundation Stability Highly variable. Excellent, but Excellent. subject to limitations of slope. Slope Stability Highly variable. Stands for long Stands in steep periods in steep natural and cutslopes natural and for long periods. artificial cuts. Dip of beds may affect slope stability. --- Seismic Stability Very poor. Good. Good. Information Source: Geologic Map of the Renton Quadrangle, King County, Washington by D.R. Mullineaux (Map GQ-405). 1 Renton Hill is underlain with coal deposits, much of which have been mined out. The remaining deposits are considered marginal quality and are usually in thin, twisted beds at great depths. It is not economically feasible to mine this coal at the present time due to a variety of reasons. Although it is possible that the coal could be mined someday, as energy demands increase, technology, economic feasibility, and political realities would have to be taken into consideration. There are approximately 50 million tons of reserve coal in the Renton Coal yield, of which Renton Hill is a portion. The mined-out coal beds are under most of the area except in the southwestern corner (contiguous to FAI-405). These mined-out coal beds are approximately 150 feet below the surface of Renton Hill. The southwestern corner is probably underlain by unmined coal. (Source: Map showing nonmetallic mineral resources in part of West-Central King County Washington by William Rice; Map I-852-D.) See Exhibit E-2 for illustration of coal beds. • . A few years ago there was subsidence of a street in front of 611 Renton Avenue South undoubtedly due to the collapse of an abandonded coal mine shaft. Several truck loads of material over a period of time was required to fill the shaft. The rate of subsidence has declined substantially and periodic resurfacing of the street is necessary to fill the depression. See red dot on Exhibit B-2 for location of subsidence. 2. Topography: This site has moderate to very steep slopes. The northerly portion has slopes 30% and greater; the center portion has slopes ranging from 17 to 20%.; and the extreme southerly portion has a 10% slope. See Exhibit E-3 for slopes. • a-ts8 -z dbW -..... -- - : `- - • HlaON . . . .•.....•....:.. •'. — � $••9 •s.17 • •:• •Y•M•••••• •� ,, T.asi!, . i •••▪ ••▪ • • i • • • ••••••••• Al": nit 1�, - I ••• •.• • • • •• • S..w•f!y 71,u pvLN� 1 • •• • ••• • • ••..• 'yam .� v• . 1�. ,'a 1 Yip • ( • •• •p♦�.�tpf.• •r♦••• - • • ( • •• •.• •lUUU-•.,•• • •••••••• • •• •O• •• , •♦ p• ••••••••• • •• •• •N•• • • • •••• •..••• • • '• •••• •••••• • •♦• li ••o• T•i • a `••• ..•::• 1� . aN*• :•0 �•• ••4 5 '5 :ii.• -L•.: .s •...i• I 'q • rlrpN..�.. . •... •.•.. • ♦ •• • •..•..•1 •• ••V • '^•• • .) • ••.h• • .00,0•• •• • r ••.•••• .%% ••• • •r• .. . c•...•••• . . ••w•(' ••••.•• '• j rY ••�• •• ••• �••• • •$..• 1►• ••••�1A •.••••• •� �.�.dddd•••j • • • • •••••• •• A•• •,•� M • •••••• • i • •.• • •4• '•• • •I••• •••• S.d ••••••• .. t ••• • . WI ••• •• ••.•q6•M•�•• ••• p' ••••••• • • ••• - ♦ •ri i••• • ••••• •• •• •• •••.••• f .< • . • • .• ••• • . • .... •. • •• ••••.•• • ho • ' ••1e•.5.•1 ♦ 40• . . • ••••• •••.♦♦•• •••▪ • ••.•.♦. • sp. 9 , ap 2,..•••, eV::..• , • , • ••• • •• •O . ••• •• ••••••,• ••' .," -r1V:W i::::f 'S'Qt•�'1 ••• •• ?.•`�•••• •i .'•••01 ;N:• Wi •• :i: :' ' =� • rd v • ►'•Q.• • ♦'..•ice• • i'.-•....•i f i7 •• • 'i'• ••.• • ••.•.'•• •♦,�•••.• •• 0. • •• •••• •••♦•q•• ••••• ••A••• 4 0NA93� .<t. • •:::. • C.'.:::L�.: ':::::W. ••• •• • • ' sail -Two, •1n0 •.Q3N/W - Z- ' 11.S///X 3 • • ._---.----------- 9o/f-b9 d"W H1a0N _• —`--� • • 4 Ili ••• •••• ••M4• \°• 7.A�O,C T,.l.-. • \ Y •\....... J • mitte, Sar.r310 7nH poW311 :, I •▪1• •••••• •1i• •7•ati • •••••• ' ✓/ _ • • ,•4 0' •• b „rip• O•• f • ••••• �y) ' 9 1Sp. • •• • . ••.• • •• •• 1� I1 pmalspa»y .. • t: ••d•• • p}� (l'�' i p�,f \1.. V4,1'a°wr•••••• p {"' - •••Ir• rr:. ! ;' 4p,,gf is : r4.1."0/.,!..,14,‘.1/i l' . . . 4v u7ki tiCa� fe •• :.0 tii10ir '� ;,�1J + �dMr h0` . I p+7;#4. •4y ....... . '•• • u et Ci{ ' ;177(t k1JY/ti�Y• r •1•• i•-WI•.1 •rlA +. •7. '1 � ,C r y, 4•••• •• • 11 64, • . A 9 07Og0 - I-a 1191NX3 - ' • . . • £XNiair E- 3 SLOPE ' / . )2 / ...:,....S; / il --..__— •, C ._'.. LI \. ---- s ) '. .' — ':',. ,,,-. , ,, (3 . . , .,,,..... ,.,., & , . .. . . . _ ,_,,y,_-_.--, ) .; ) ; , -,. _. ,,.,) .c_- .....__ ,_.______:,,. ..., ..\\ . , .,, ,i) , .... ,., • ., - , --___,...--N„.... .. ,,i.z. __- ._,.., " -, - c:;_o.s-. - _ . • ,rr .,/ ._ ._. o Z1: ' ---7-- - I',(,, (Al )4 • •., • . _---. • ; 1 o� o� PP %` ;/ _ -- ZZ, A9 _, -e£eig.sT- - - ------ ;.K 1 O ' �I - . &L - Vo . O OCI iy4 O /_-.,-- 0 _ pn t I �`----x•-•- I' 054 '�- Y .. - ..- ,, C-�!x', E.J. 0 �7 mI 1 f l• f 'J C� �� / ( f ca �� ❑ C) , ; r --'0p nn rn t I ., Zr. xl 1 } { __-_ __.__-__ _... HIGH Z :i..I t l • I w ~cci a tIi +� m I �U 1 i ¢ � I li In \\ • L I ' I . __ i_. 71\1..ram...__ ++,.=4. _ /i :; I r • PLANNING DEPARTMENT P • PRLLIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE JUNE 13, 1978 PAGE THREE • 3. Soils: The site has four soil classifications which are illustrated on Exhibit E-4. .The northerly most portion is Beausite gravely sandy loam, 15 to 30% slopes (BeD); foundations for low buildings is considered severe. In the south western corner is Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep (AkF); foundations for low buildings is considered severe with moderate and severe slippage potential. A small portion of the site by Grant Avenue South has Arents, Everett soil (An); the hazard for foundations to low buildings s is • slight to none. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15% slopes (AgC) • • occupies the south easterly portion of the site; this soil has moderate limitations for foundations of low buildings and a seasonal high water table. Considerable erosion has occured on orooerty (multi-family) to the north of the site which apparently does not adequately control surface drainage. • 4. Vegetation: The site has alder; maple and willow trees with blackberry, ferns, hazel and ivy for shrubs and ground cover. The vegetation is con- sidered abundant except where the land has been clearcut for an apparent road west of and parallel to Cedar Avenue. 5. Wildlife: Due to the surrounding development, the site would be suitable for only small birds and mammals. 6. Water: There are two seasonal drainage ditches on the site. Both appear to have their primary sources of water east of.the site from developed single family areas. 7. Land Use: FAI-405 lies to the west and lower in elevation than the site. A .Puget Sound Power and Light Company transmission line right-of-way is contiguous to the south. Established single family dwellings lie to the • east of the site. To the north of the site are apartments and condominiums. • F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Renton Hill was subdivided and developed prior to the turn of the century. When_ it was developed and for many years thereafter, it was considered one of the nicer areas in which to live. This was due in part to being above the flood plain, having a view, being at a higher elevation than industrial activities, and a variety of other reasons. Over a period of years the Hill began to decline. However, this trend has reversed itself in recent years. Some homes were converted to apartments and new apartments were constructed. During the early 1960's, FAI-405 was constructed leaving only one access to Renton Hill. In 1953 the City adopted a zoning ordinance which tended to segregate the single and multi-family residences on the Hill. This•helped contain multi-family• to Mill Avenue (along FAI-405) and miniinize the spread of multi-family throughout the Hill. During the early 1970's a sense of community pride began to redevelope which lead to cohesive community action. Eventually, a community club was formed to represent Renton Hill. The City of Renton and the residents.of Renton Hill have invested considerable amounts of money in the area since January 1976. Cedar Street between South 3rd Street•and South 9th Street was .completely rebuilt with a new street, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, illumination and overhead utilities were placed underground. The project cost $200,162.04, of which the residents paid $43,310.11 through a local improvement district (LID 293). Sixty nine parcels participated'in the LID which calculates to an average of $627.68 per parcel. • Since January 1976 considerable private investment has taken place on Renton Hill including 5 new single family dwellings;. one new addition to single family •residence; one new story on single family residence; two new private garages; one lowered base- ment; and a new eight unit apartment. The new homes were erected on lots that were due either to demolition of a home, never had been developed, or were short plated from a larger lot. , . . • it Xiii8iT E - 9 aft • I SOILS . o\ . - .... -x.• .. ... * :•• .e.: - ' 0 \ o ,.. %-..i.L•NITIN --,,,,.--...•••• , ..- ... , - •.• -,,.::-•••..••.; A '.rilriti-ti F rfe'•::! :• '•• , . - ....i' ..s''.., : a P 0 .1,A4 / , 2,2:.•:•...:,:.i.':::. *----:::::,:-..*.f: *: ;:• 4 ,y,,,4fri! pir ....... '•:" • •,..i.1';••:::•••::..;.* :•••i'•:'-'?:••1 0 , ::::::::::::•:•x; , F y,,,t,i,i• ,e1) .I-'...'s'''....'''.,:••is. '':.'..::?!:::::•.....—•::•:: :....*:. CS A:::;:e. A k• . ,fc,. iM ;..•••......'x',.... ....:. . ..'.. ...: . ..... Qz 5j .... ••:•• : a ,. ..„ -... i. ..,.:..,.. . ... .. . .: ..i.4.40* .:- :.!?':',...:.q?:::::','::...,;:* l ? II 4 415{i ::,.• •• ..'':.....: -::.':i ...,:;.-.. .....•.:';,. .1...:' 1=3 El ''..:: An L : ', :+••(tr•„i i'...:••:fs'.z:'..:.,::,.. ......:'' ...,';'''' ..''•••.:' " ti 9, Z :jr.%• 11" r, , *.i••• ,..;..• • .:. .., •s.:.. ,..fi-*. :.•••, " . :. i:i::•.• . , , - • • . *:,•":'%:Ns s .:',•-•. .. ....`.: t' 0 c,t• _ **.OA 4 4,',...,.‘ ..;'....:-.;••..'.....,.. 1::,..1...:,`'.:".•••••• k .. .. .N.:,1 r., ,, '-3. :. .:: *:...:Y• .#41.``.r .'.::.• .: ; ., .: ••••••:;,::::.::. ... .,..:-..•,•-s a------- k7;=S-11"‘: 110e V :. ;••••:•.,..• , .,,• .• •.,•,•::•,: -. .....:-%..,:w, ?-:.•.,,.....::. ....: ..1. l• - - • ••••:i:ii,) ,‘,)c; tc.,:: .•:-. ; ... .5' -....,1'. ••••:-',' ',../...... ,.K.• ,s„ • • ee,.. . '. ..•. ••••.:.... ,•••:....-- s• * 0:„._ fi ;::::::E:i:::•:„' e••1 , ;: r,1 -,,,*-•.'.:-. •-,•,‘.‘..;.:•:.. :...*:;•-.:',q,...;,*, k , _••••_„,....Eiii:Eia::: :: , :‘v . ,I•' ,„„' 's•• :••:':...:•• •,,k.:. "•••••••••••:* .. J • ••"' v•. —• -.••:. ,, •.• • • ..:::•:::::::::*:::::: ::. r. . "' .?•s i PiL:C• :.;:.., 41 0 0 • _ - .::::::;:fti:::::i:i$14: i • 4 t e,,,V •,:r4.,kyr!"- . . ' RENTON A LI- Reaftvirs Al I ii:::.:::i:11:!:$.***::::::::::::.:1::::••:1`;.•4"Yr 1-,•,,,-..vovtb 2 en4le•I / Ow° e 1 • • •••%'•••• •ir. „''t N^. (...i ,, i ,. - --- --.. a• . • . • ••• -. ..".••• , • fttr'll'(''' ',.:,.;.: :: -''•-" dialli , "•-::.______. A I ....._ , ' NORTH -------t—...-----i-, • ; ,' -•3?: EXHIBIT H—I SOUND MEASuREHENTS , LEGEND V a to 0 o f") S 777Y Sr 2 L,,,,Atiohs i ca c3 E ..,,, . oo . P 0\ A e•re s own IliB . •CI .0 P a Yeadinis were_ n 0 IS 0 a .1, ti• a -,-..xtpt B 0 6 cij ,, 1 i Z © : Lit' ' 0 0 0 g a C :'/ Ei ril :. D co : 0 :: ,,, B o o n 0 o 4' 0-,)111 CI c3 ' 4' 1/4, 0 . .1 0 0 1:' , ., L-).. in 0 I i'• ‘] 4 0 10 D , 0 .! 1 t 0 ,,_..1.• '.•'. DO CID 0 0 13 0 a 0 i ' k LJ/ Z_/ ',, Y :.0 t 2 0: fl I 0...00 tia D 1-.1 a it ;: ., :: i .....,.-:. 0 0- a a , REKTeN PILL ACIANES ..•••., .,,, , .., Ep t_t1 &Ise/ •-•., ,/,'•••,. ''*.6:4•.„ Ir ...,0 mop R.A.-Pl...,..,.,3 be 0........ ., -...... •.1..7. 6 --'44...!, ".::,:z. ''''-, , ammig -••,..---..,..;p. .Wills , NORTH '''••.-4—...:>-a.-—...---.. .-....-.-....--....-...-.-............. :• 1 1;,i1I G DEPAR[MENT PRELIMINARY REPORT 1u nakR EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF REiNTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZOnr. JUNE 13, 1978 PAGE FOUR Two short plats (two lots each) and one preliminary Planned Unit Development applications were received by the City from Renton Hill since 1976. In addition, a large tentative plat (2.45 acres, 93 lots) application was received on a parcel south of and contiguous to Renton Hill ; this subdivision does not propose to have access via Renton Hill. Effective July 1, 1978 low and moderate home owners will be eligible for grants up to $2,500 for rehabilitation of their detached single family dwellings through the City of Renton Housing Repair Program. Renton Hill is designated as one of the City's target neighborhoods. G. TRAFFIC: . Renton Hill is essentially a large cul-de-sac with one access, Mill Avenue South. The Seattle Cedar River Pipeline right-of-way provides a secondary access for emergency vehicles. This facilitiy was closed in 1973 at the request of the residents of the Hill to eliminate the through traffic that came to and from the Cascade area to the south. The residents of Renton Hill considered the through traffic inappropriate and dangerous to the community. The streets are rather steep and serious questions can be raised concerning traffic safety if too many cars use the streets. Between South 3rd and 7th Streets, Renton Avenue and Cedar Avenue average 9.2% and 7.7% slope respectively. • Renton Avenue has a short stretch that has a grade in excess of 15% between the same streets. With the grid iron street pattern, a vehicle (and anything which the vehicle might hit) can be in serious trouble should a serious mechanical problem occur such as brake failure. On January 22, 1978 traffic counts were conducted and found movement of 2,650 vehicles during a 24-hour period. This represents 1,350 vehicles entering and leaving the Hill each day. Burlington Northern Railroad has a major east-west track accross Mill Avenue South, the sole access to Renton Hill. During the 16 hours per day that the Renton railroad station is manned, there is an average of 14 trains that pass through the city. This does not include the numerous short blockages due to switching activities. Blockage of Mill Avenue can be critical should an emergency occur on Renton Hill while a train crosses Mill Avenue. ( H. SOUND: Sound readings were taken in mid May 1978.at six locations on or near the site as illustrated in Exhibit H-1. The detailed sound records are available on file 7. in the Renton Planning Department. The freeway is the major source of sound at the western side of the site while airplanes, dogs, the city park, and other urban sources were more important as the loud-sound generators at the eastern extremity. B Even at the eastern end, the freeway provided audible background sounds through- out the site. Listed below is a synopsis of the findings: dBA LEVELS 9' Site Ili_`h — — Averages --- -- — ..-.__ • erara _Low . 10• 1 79 76 - 65 63 2 66 62 - 59 56 3 73 61 - 58 55 4 68 54 - 53 52 5 59 55 - 52 51 6 61 56 - 44 44 �RPr Generally, the closer to FAI-405, the greater the sound. It is anticipated that traffic will increase as growth occurs in South' King County on FAI-405 and therefore r the sound levels on Renton Hill will increase also. Sleep interference occurs at 1pr 40 dBA; speech interference at 55 dGA; hearing loss with continuous exposure at 80 dBA, although some experts believe hearing loss happens at a lower level. As indicated by the above data, there is speech interference with outside activities during the day and a potential loss of hearing if exposed for a long period of time. • • PLANNING DEPARTMEN', • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARNG EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78,REZONE JUNE 13, 1978 PAGE FIVE • ' Sound inside a dwelling is generally 15 to 20 dBA less when the windows are open and 20 to 25 dBA quieter when the windows are closed. Dwellings con • - structed on the site could experience sound levels that will cause interference with normal, conversation and perhaps sleep. . I. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Water and Sewer: There are existing 4 inch water mains located in Cedar and Renton Avenue South and South 10th Street. An 8 inch water main is located in South 9th and llth Streets. An 18 inch sanitary sewer line is located in the. Puget Sound transmission line right-of-way that could serve the site. 2. Fire Protection: Fire protection is provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirements. Any future development of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards. 3. Transit: Metro provides bus service along the periphery of Renton Hill. Metro Transit route numbers 107 and 240 operate north of the hill on Mill Avenue 'South. Bronson Way South is served by bus route number 142 and route number 155 serves Main Avenue South. All of these busses are within walking distance of Renton Hill. • • 4. Schools: Renton Hill is served via school, bu,s by the Bryn Mawr Elementary School, and Dimmitt Junior High School. Renton High School serves Renton • Hill. 5. 'Parks: Phillip Arnold Park, a neighborhood park, 'is within walking distance of all areas within the site. Three additional city parks, Liberty, Cedar River and Jones Park, are approximately half a mile north of the site. J. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: • 1. Section 4-706, R-1 Single Family District. 2. Section 4-709A, R-3 Medium Density Residence District. 3. Section 4-725, Amendments. ' 4. Chapter 22, Parking and Loading. K. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 7 1. Land Use Report, 1965, Residential, Page 11 , and Objectives Pages 17 and 18. L. IMPACT ON NATURAL SYSTEMS: The rezoning of the property will not have a direct impact on the natural systems. However, any development of the site will disturb present soil and vegetation_ • conditions, increase storm water runoff, thereby increasing the possibility of • erosion, and add to the noise and traffic levels. These conditions may be minimized by the application of proper development controls. I ' M. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The development of the site for, residential use will increase opportunity for social interaction. 4 • • 4 V 4 • PLANNING DEPARTMENT • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE JUNE 13, 1978 PAGE SIX • N. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended (RCW 43.21C), a declaration.of non-significance has been issued for the subject proposal. 0. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1. City of Renton Building Division 2. City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department 6. United States Geological Survey 7.' Renton School District Number 403 8. Puget Sound Power and Light Company • 9. Pacific Northwest Bell 10. Department of Ecology P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. The proposed rezone to R-1 is consistent with the Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site and area as single family residential. • 2. .The existing zoning around the site -is R-,1 to the east, R-3 to the north, and GS-1 to the south. The freeway (FAI-405) to the west is not zoned and acts as a physical barrier. The R-1 and R-3 zones are developed as zoned; the 0S-1 zone is developed as. an electrical transmission line which pre- .cludes more intensive development. These circumstances together with • other elements appear to establish the subject site as a single family • area which requires protection from other uses to protect the existing single family area. (Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, 1965, Objectives • 1, page 17; Policy Statement, Summary, pages 9 and 10) 3. The.goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Use Report, page 17, objective number 1, states: "Prevent blight by protecting resi- dential and other exclusive districts from the unwarranted infiltra- tion of incompatible uses which would contribute to premature decay • and obsolesence, and prevent the development of orderly growth pat- ' terns." The majority of the Renton Hill area,is an existing single family residential neighborhood. Rezone and development of the subject area to single family residence density. either by standard subdivision or by P.U.D. cluster-type development, would be compati- ble, with the existing neighborhood and consistent with such objective. . Development to higher densities would' result in infiltration of incom- patible zoning, land uses, and such Comprehensive Plan objectives. 4. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, page 17, also has as objective number 4, "Protect property values within the community for the benefit of its residents and property owners, through the effective control of land use and the enforcement and application of building and construction codes." The proposed rezone will control and regulate the land use of the subject area to a degree that is compatible with other property in the area, thereby encouraging and strengthening the livability, both physical and social, within the existing neighborhood. This would further the present character of the "Hill" as highly desirable single family residence area. 5. Such rezone to R-1 will continue the present trehd for new single family residential construction and remodeling of existing residences in this community, which further indicates the desirability of the area as a separate single family residence area. It would, therefore, be consistent with the objective number 6 of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, page 18, to "encourage the development and Utilization of land to its highest and best use in such a way as to promote the best • interest of the community and contribute to its overall attractiveness and desirability as a place in which to work, shop, live, and play." • • • AP PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAIIINER PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE JUNE 13, 1978 PAGE SEVEN 6. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report, page 18, clearly states as a method of implementation (number 6) the need to "conduct planning studies on problems of current interest or need as conditions change and revisions or amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are deemed desirable." Conditions have changed in the area through the continued construction, revitalization, investment, and community involvement in the area as a single family neighborhood, as well as the lack of adequate access for multiple family residential being developed, and the overall attitude of the legislative body and the community toward the retention of a viable and significant single family area through the revision to the Comprehensive Plan. It is further noted in this implementation section that "the purposeful • and consistent attention to the overall purposes and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan will produce continuing and long term benefits for the community." The proposed rezone is a reflection of the "overall purposes and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan" through the proper use of land use regulations and zoning to protect the citizens of the community and provide for orderly and compatible growth trends. The "continuing" benefits to the community will be reflected by the proposed rezone consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The aspect of planning as a "continuing" process is important. As the City grows and changes in its physical character so also do the attitudes of its citi- zens. The Comprehensive Plan and its implementation methods (i.e., zoning, capital improvements, arterials and streets plans) must reflect these changes to be an effective planning tool. 7. The Policy Statement, Comprehensive Plan, defines the ideal neighborhood as an area "consisting of a relatively solid pattern of homes, linked by by quiet streets and centered around an elementary school and park." • Although this concept has changed somewhat in recent years, the Renton Hill neighborhood basically reflects such a concept. This portion of the Plan also states that "in planning neighborhoods the creation of residential districts free of overcrowding influences, arterial traffic . are important objectives." Such objectives will be significantly upheld by the proposed rezone. 8. The Policy Statement of the Comprehensive Plan, page 6, E. , TRaffic Ways, states that "It shall be the objective of the City of develop or require the development of its traffic ways in accordance with their intended use. Generally, heavy and fast moving traffic will be routed around neighborhoods with only minor residential streets bisecting. them. Right-of-way width standards for different classifications of streets shall be those developed in detail and contained in the Arterials and Streets Report of the R.U.A. Comprehensive Plan. The construction of streets shall be related to need and funtion as determined by traffic engineering studies." Reference to the Arterials and Streets Plan as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance, indicates that this access to the subject area is not adequate for any use higher density than single family residential. Even as a new single family residential area the access would be questionable. However, it is one of the last remaining large undeveloped areas of the "Hill" and, therefore, would not create significant additional traffic problems if developed as single family residential. 9. Access to Renton Hill is restricted to one entrance that is subject to blockage by trains. Several of the streets which provide access to the various areas on the "Hill" are steep, laid out in a grid arrangement, and as such should not be overloaded. The grades of the streets present a potential hazard not normally found in a residential development. Also, one street has had a small section subsidence. (Comprehensive Plan, Arterials and Streets, 1965, Purposes and Objectives of Study, pages 2 and 3) Both Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South have i PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE JUNE.13, 1978 PAGE EIGHT a right-of-way width of forty feet with improvements less than that which is normally required. Standard residential access streets are 50 to 60 feet in width. Due to existing structures and improvements, there is little likelihood that these streets can be enlarged. Given this situation, the proposed rezone would have fewer impacts to the existing streets than the existing zoning. In fact, the Streets and Arterials Plan, page 5, states that "in the planning, design, and location of the major street system, consideration should be given to esthetics and community amenities in order that the system may provide attractive as well as safe, efficient circulation routes, and do the least damage to adjacent land uses and improvements. Conversely, the design and location of adjacent improvements should present the least possible interference with the traffic carrying capabilities of these traffic ways." • 10. The Streets and Arterials Plan also states as .objectives (page 3): a. Provision for the safe, efficient and convenient move- ment of peoples and goods. • b. Arterial and street patterns compatible with and com- plimentary to the general land use plan. c. Adequate and safe access to allow convenient and effi- cient utilization of abutting properties. The proposed rezone would be consistent with these objectives by reducing densities and resulting traffic volumes and providing for land use more compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and 'roadway system. Also, the introduction of any larger street system into • and through the area would be contrary to these and other Compre- hensive Plan objectives. (i.e. , Policy Statement, Comprehensive • Plan, page 4, "These trafficways should be so•designed that they function efficiently...their operation should not conflict or interfere with the functions of the residential neighborhoods.") 11. It is apparent from the attached exhibits that the site has physical • characteristics such as slope, mined-out coal beds, soils, and existing • heavy vegetation which create potential problems in development and which should be considered when reviewing the size and intensity of • development. Certain types of higher intensity development may in fact create potential hazards. Therefore, it would be in the public interest to minimize such possible hazard by proper planning, zoning, and development controls. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Report designates the site as 25% - 40 slope with certain portions over 40% slope. The Plan indicates "that extreme caution should be exer- cised in the utilization of these potentially dangerous areas for residential sites." The lesser density of the R-1 zone would be more compatible with such objectives and present fewer hazards, • especially if developed by P.U.D (Planned Hnit Development) within the single family residence density which would provide for clustering of units within more appropriate areas of the site, preserving steeper areas, significant trees, and natural open spaces. The Comprehensive Plan, Policy Statement, page 6, infers such a relationship between land use, topography, and other physical conditions of the terrain when it states that "properly designed plats related to terrain conditions will be pleasing to the eye, economically sound, and safe for the residents." I?. the site is subject to loud sound levels, especially from FAI-405. The Department of Ecology recommended that performance standards be applied to sleeping areas of the dwelling to permit sleep. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF RENTON, FILE NUMBER R-178-78, REZONE JUNE 13, 1978 PAGE NINE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the above background data, analysis, and the Comprehensive Plan recommend approval of R-1 zoning for the subject area. It is further suggested that reasonable development of the area can and should be pursued by means of a P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development). Existing vegetation and other natural characteristics of the site should be retained as much as possible and incorporated into site planning, design, and development. Access. shall be limited to existing streets and approved as part of any site development. On-site soils and geology investigations should be conducted to determine whether the site is safe to develop; and if it is safe to develop, to obtain recommendations on how to develop. ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION • TO: • O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department • Q Park Department • 8Police Department Public Works Department ® Building Div. © Engineering Div. Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or ' hiss designee) ,a� ..,/i'. ,� t . �f/�nla✓,,�/�.,,� DATE: � • PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: /�-/ 73-7Q REZONE / rZ,- Ml'/' 1e•„r_-,.rl MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE, BEFORE �.� ?f /•v7y REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: (,•�l�' Comments: • Signature irector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: 1 r,, L,—„�� Comments: do r, i- • -/- 74" P-6nature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: CiLJ Comments: cAe Sig re of Director or Authorized 'Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: ; ;-a Mc. E i-;y, -c• inc • Comments: • / • • Sign uat re of Director or Authorized presentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: uric rim" Comments: ITS aeae Signature of Director or Authorized Representative , Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: • Comments: Signature of Director or Authorised Representative Date • • 4/°,:iV"RENT�� ,5 `SING : •• • • / , I i ,f 1i y l a. ,:l, ".• y• '••=4•'.c / / y / / , •yj ' • �/e . '�.i!.. .. •7 '.,_ /,. '1 -! _ 1 1. C?I)?:. i �._.., .r r , r' c ✓1;{'.•,/./ , c e. 1�� • 1. :/ ,� . • ,. , ,. / r'��C,.. �%,C. • • £AL • COPY OF THE ABOVE MEMO; (ok'd by - WCG ) ( 6/5/78) • Engineering Department Gary Kruger, Planning Department ' Subject: Renton Hill Rezone The drainage basin encompassed by the p,'uposed rezone area, , and a large portion of already developed portion of Renton ' Hill , empties into an already overloaded system. Any development in this area would require extensive storm water detention and/or other means of controlling the run-off. The rezone as proposed would in effect reduce the possible impact of storm water run-off over the present zoning. (Signed--) BOB BRAY • • ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: O Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department ® Public Works Department 8 Building Div. Engineering Div. ® Traffic Engineering Div. ® Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) A—,--( . / -v.( .---41.4;(-- -,P4,.,ff SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 35/-7 8 ; Application No. : R -/78- s Action Name: .41,,,?;:— tw- , ,7..,4 . Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) : .24//n Note: Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: g Department: OC..U& 6 Comments: `, /� 1. ?�i+' -r1, ,/,t-1' ce,- l:r/ - L.0 1J,: , -Q(/.L+C�Ka ✓ /7. a. 2,-,--... c."- _Ur ,r-"-- 3--"" ?6)_---?y Signature of Directo Authorized Representative Date 9. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: 10. , Department: Etc;` ,..//r//.ems/).7/ , Comments : �;� , r .ii//,—A C. PURPO. The re, Cutup re? >i',I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 44„ REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: 7"alti� ��r�rNE'�r/fig Comments: / �-G1 gyre h-,�,9�c-/ / o�e lG1 p Q/ !<i i She (4-) . L ‘ .//y Signature of Director or Authorized Repr sentative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Comments: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: Comments: 10 C. PU Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Thy Con r PROPOSEDiriNAL ' :LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE *N-SIGNIFICANCE • Application No. R-178-78 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No. ECF-351-78 a FINAL Declaration Description of proposal City initiated rezone of five contiguous parcels consisting of 12. 1± acres from R-3 to R-1. Proponent CITY OF RENTON • Location of •Proposal Renton Hill Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to 0 have 13 not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS 0 is ® is not required under RCW 43. 21C .030(2) (c) . This decision was • made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. non . . Reasons for declaration of environmental/significance: This negative declaration only applies to the rezone of the subject site. Additional environmental review will be required as part of specific site development review. Measures , if any, that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental •impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would . withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Officia Gordon Y. Ericksen Title _ P nin , fir , or Date June 5, 1978 Signat !% __._ City of Renton Planning Department 5-7 • C. • t • RECEIVED CITY EXHIBIT HEARINGOF EXAMINER RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION Iu L 31978 PMITEM NO. %'7 SEPTEMBER 25, 1963 AM Page 2 71R19110111112111213141;7►6 • I 3, Continued: • It was moved by Peretti, seconded by Holmes, .to recommend to the Ciit Council the granting of L-1 with deed restrictions as stated in tthebirector s report. On the question, Mr. Felker pointed Out that since Renton has not as yet adopted the Industrial Park Classification District as a part of the Zoning Code, these restrictions on the property are voluntary agreements on the part of the applicants. Question being called, the motion carried. (e PUGET PROPERTIES, INC. , 'GS-1, G9600, G7200 to R-1, SR-1, R-3, R-4, B-1, The Committee's report was read concurring in the requested zonings. However, the. Committee has some reservations on the Restricted B-1 area, and also on the R-1 Utility Reserve area•. The Director's report was to recommend that the proposals as sub- „mitted_.containing requests for R-1, SR-1, R-4, R-3, and B-1 be approved as submitted. ,The proposal for development of Puget Properties is con- sistent in that community goals and general requirements for neighbor-, hood facilities are met. It is further believed that this proposal will be in agreement with the development of the comprehensive plan for the City. A letter was read from Puget Properties, Inc. pursuant to the dele- tion of certain areas designated for public use as follows: 1. School Sites No. 1 and 2, 2, Reservoir Site No. 1. 3. The S. 600' of the E. 400° of the S.W. 1/4 of the N. W. 1/4 of Section 30, Twp. 23 N. , R. 5 E. W.M. (Reservoir site and portion of proposed Benson- Highway Relocation area). The Commission .inspected the deleted areas on a map. These deleted areas were initialed and dated by the Commission and the map is to be attached as a part of the permanent file. Mr. Hoglund, of Washington Natural Gas Company, spoke regarding_ the area designated as' R-l 'Uttility Reserve. He displayed a drawing, show- ing the site arrangement for the proposed installation of reserve gas tanks, .site operation, etc. He stated that this would be in opera • - tion about 10 days a year, under only extreme cold weather conditons. The location at the confluence with the El Paso Natural Gas line is im- portant from the standpoint of economy and convenience. He further stated that the Company will employ landscaping to screen the area as much as possible from the adjacent areas. He cited Section 1V, 3, of . the Renton City Zoning code, which allows for this type of public utility-, Slides of the subject areas were shown. Relative to the R-1 Util- ity Reserve area, Mr. Jensen stated that the Commission exercises the same control over such matters as' this in the R-1 as in the P-1 District, that plot plans are subject to approval of the Commission before a build- ing permit could be issued,. • Chairman Denzer asked if there were any objections to the proposed, rezones. There being no oral. or written objections it was moved by Peretti, seconded by Racanello, that the rezones as per the revised map be recommended to the City Council. Motion carried. Mr. McGarrigle ob- stained from voting. p.c!,1—,; , PLAN.,INGG CoMMissioN RECEIVED r I^,G MEETING CITY OF RENTON ,,EAR,NG EXAMINER OCTOBER 12, 1977 i O\' 1 01977 AM FM MINUTES 7,Ri91IB,1IiLit i2i11,415.-i COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Brian Gain, Logan Garrison; Sandra Gist, Anthone Mola, Barbara Schellert, Clark Teegarden, Joan Walker. COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: Thomas Buckingham. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director; Willis Roberts, Recording Secretary. 1 . CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walker at 8:00 p.m. , who led the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary Gist. All members responded present with the exception of Commissioner Gain, who arrived at 8:03 p.m. , and Commissioner Buckingham (on vacation) . It was noted that newly appointed Commissioner Robert Kingen will not be available until mid-November. • ACTION: MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT THE ABSENT COMMISSIONER BE EXCUSED. MOTION CARRIED. 3• APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The Chairman .called for corrections or additions to the minutes of August 10, 1977 . Commissioner Garrison noted that the roll call vote at the top of page eight should be corrected to include a "no"vote by Commissioner Gain. Noting no further corrections or additions, IT WAS MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE AUGUST 10, 1977 , MINUTES BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. MOTION CARRIED. • The Chairman called for corrections or additions to the minutes of. September 14, 1977 . - As none were offered , IT WAS MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN , THAT THE MINUTES BE APPROVED AS WRITTEN. MOTION CARRIED. 4. OLD BUSINESS: COUNCIL REFERRAL: PETITION TO REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA, PAR- TICULARLY THE MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE RECEIVED VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH . CITY OF RENT01' THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 HEARING EXAMINER ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH , THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST , AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY J U N 1 3 1978 ON THE SOUTH. AM . Noting continuation from the September 14th public hearing, Chair-7I8I9IfOe11o12o•1.12l` a4.t man Walker requested a review by the Planning Director. • Mr. Ericksen noted receipt of additional information since the previous public hearing--a legal memorandum and copy of a. court case from the attorney representing the Renton Hill Community Association; a letter from Kathy Keolker, Chairperson, Renton Hill Community Association; a' letter from Mrs. E. Edna Costner, 439 Renton Avenue. South, Renton , requesting consideration of low density multi -family use on a particular parcel of property which • r --I I I3 IT .l.: ). ITEM NO. / ' 11) Renton Planning Commission Public Hearing Meeting October 12, 1977 Page Two lies between Cedar Avenue Soutn and Renton Avenue South. He referred the Commission to , a memorandum from the Assistant City Attorney. reviewing the matter of area-wide zoning, as . • requested by the Comprehensive Planning Committee. Mr. Ericksen indicated that all input had been reviewed by the Comprehensive Planning Committee;. the area had been visited by Committee • members ; and the Committee has considered the Land Use Plan, the Community Facilities Plan , and the Arterial Street Plan for the study area. Maps of the area relating to the existing and pro- posed Comprehensive Plan, proposed Community Facilities Plan, and existing Arterial Street Plan were displayed and discussed. The Chairman requested comments from the Commission members. Noting none, she called for the Comprehensive Planning Committee report . Commissioner 'Teegarden, Chairman of the Comprehensive Planning Committee, noted that the Committee had met with representatives from the Renton Hill Community Association and Gene Farrell , developer, and on three .occasions had visited the study area. After study and deliberation, the Committee submits its recom- mendation dated October 12, 1977. Mr. Teegarden then read the committee report in its entirety (copy attached) . It was noted that the report primarily concerns that area of Renton Hill north of the Puget Sound Power and Light powerline right-of-way to its south , west to FAI-405 , and east to the greenbelt area. Mr. Teegarden also noted that Mrs . Costner' s property had been field checked and that it was their opinion that subdivision into • three single family residence lots would be more desirable for Mrs . Costner and the community than low density multiple family development. He then discussed the Committee' s plans for further study of the expanded area to the south and the possibility of reviewing the zoning on Renton Hill . Discussion among the Commissioners ensued relative to the question of zoning in the area and the appropriateness of its review. Noting current consideration of only the Comprehensive Plan in the area , as described in the Comprehensive Planning Committee' s report , the Chairman invited audience comment . • Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, representing the Renton Hill Community Association , thanked the members of the Comprehensive Planning Committee for their in-depth study and expressed appreciation regarding the task of the Commission and their opportunity to participate in their review. Mrs . Koelker stated that the Renton Hill Association concurs with the recom- mendations . Gene Farrell , 11112 Rainier Avenue and 280 Hardie S.W. ; Renton, stated that they also enjoyed their association with the Commit- tee , although they are disturbed by the recommendation. Mr. Farrell discussed the property presently designated multi-family residential along the western edge of Renton Hill owned by the Transamerica Company. He also discussed the multi,-family desig- nated area in the expanded area to the south and its relationship - � to the single family residential area on Renton Hill . He ques- tioned the Committee ' s recommendation with regard to access, not-ing the, need for fire protection and potential single family development to the east. He suggested that Cedar Avenue South be reserved for traffic purposes and that parking be restricted. the matters of multi -family construction over old coal mines; drainage, greenbelts , and topography were discussed. Mr. Farrell noted economic benefits as the result of multi -family development and inquired regarding possible compensation should the multi- family designated property be reduced to a lesser density. Robert. Metioth , 505i3 South Third Street and 1632 Lincoln Court S. E. , Renton , noted that part of Mr. Farrell ' s comments related to the • • entor. Planning Commis,'r Public Hearin., Meetir,; Cctooer 12 , 1977 Page Three zonir,a it the area rather than the Comprehensive Plan. He indi- cated concurrence in the recommendation of the Committee, noting the following factors as justification : the amount of traffic, limited access , safety and .character of the neighborhood. He stated that they feel the Comprenensive Plan change is both desirable and necessary, and they hope the Commission will support it. . Patricia Parks, 118 No. 40th, Seattle, attorney for Transamerica • Development Corporation, described multi-family zoned property owned by Transamerica which is affected by the Committee's recom • - mendation and discussed the history of its ownership. She indi- cated that the• City' s Comprehensive Plan had been 'reviewed during the period of Transamerica' s ownership, and there had been no recommendation for change until the present time. She asked. that the Comprehensive Plan reflect the interests of her client as well as other property owners in the area and indicated ,that the pro- • • posed change should be reasonable, una_rbitrary, and fair. She • then cited potential loss to Transamerica should the Plan be changed and •noted possible legal action. • ' Commissioner Teegarden noted that while the Comprehensive Plan has been revised in 'some instances in various parts of the City since 1965', he doesn' t recall that the subject area. was con.- sidered during that period. The Chairman 'called for further comments . • Mr. McBeth offered examples• of court cases relating to what he considers similar situations to that being reviewed in which it was noted that the City has the right to change a designation ' reoardinq certain property, if it feels it appropriate , as long as the owner has hot applied for a building permit. He dis- 'cussed the ' factors that he felt should be considered by the Plan- ning_ Commission in making its decision and again asked for appro- val of the Committee' s recommendation. Ms. Parks requested that the decision be delayed' to allow her further _time to review the Comprehensive Planning Committee' s • report and other issues . Mr. Farrell noted that property Adjacent to a freeway should be considered in a unique manner, particularly if it' s sizable. Mrs . Koelker noted that the matter had been under consideration for some time .and indicated that it was her opinion that an extended public hearing is not warrented. David L . DeVore, 692.8 South 120th Place, Renton, stated that the Committee study covered a large area , and yet attention was focused: �r in the vicinity of Cedar Avenue South. he indicated that this =R could be considered discriminatory in his view. Oliver Gotte, 810 Grant Avenue South, Renton , noted that parking on the street was necessary due to inadequacy of the alleys. James Breda , 1002 Grant Avenue South, Renton, noted the signifi- cant amount of renovation occurring in the community. • Louis Traverso; 519 Cedar Avenue South, stated that the residents want to maintain their quiet, safe community. • 'Noting no further public input, the Ch'airn'ian inquired regarding the wish of the Commission. IT WAS ACTrON: • • MUVED or CCAIN, SECONDED Hy i11ST, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING 9E CLOSED. . • ,�Wlu Renton Planning Commission Public Hearing Meeting October 12, 1977 Page Four Discussion regarding the appropriateness of closing the public hearing followed, and it was noted that the Commission will be making its recommendation to the City Council for final decision. • On the question, MOTION CARRIED. Discussion followed, and IT WAS • ACTION: ' MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GARRISON, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION CONCUR IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT AND FORWARD IT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION. Discussion among the Commissioners followed with regard to the area involved, the prospect of further review of the expanded area south of Renton Hill , and the status of building permits in the affected area. On the question, MOTION CARRIED. • The Chairman recognized Commissioner Teegarden, who moved as follows: ACTION: • MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE COMMISSION ADVERTISE AND HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 9, 1977, TO CONSIDER THE COM- PREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE AREA SOUTH OF THE PUGET SOUND POWER AND • LIGHT COMPANY TRANSMISSION RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PUGET DRIVE AND ALSO THE AREA EAST OF RENTON HILL TO THE GENERAL AREA OF THE GREENBELT AND TO CONSIDER THE REZONE REQUEST AS FORWARDED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THAT BROADER AREA, INCLUDING THE RENTON HILL AREA. Discussion followed relative to the scope and magnitude of the proposed review and the appropriateness of considering both the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning. On the question, a roll call vote was requested with the following results: ' GAIN - NO GARRISON - NO GIST - YES MOLA - YES SCHELLERT - YES TEEGARDEN - YES MOTION CARRIED. Further discussion ensued with regard to the vote cast concerning the earlier action to accept the Comprehensive Planning Committee' s report for reference to the City Council . IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY SCHELLERT, THAT THE COMMISSION TAKE A • ROLL CALL VOTE ON THE MATTER OF ACCEPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMWTTEE'S REPORT ON THE RENTON HILL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSIDERA- TION AND ADVISE THE COUNCIL OF THE RESULTS. MOTION CARRIED. A roll call reaffirming the vote taken earlier regarding the accept- ance of the Comprehensive Planning Committee for recommendation. to the City Council was taken with the following results: GAIN - YES MOLA - YES GARRISON - YES SCHELLERT - NO GIST - NO TEEGARDEN - YES FOUR YESES) TWO NOES. . \ V • •~ 41 RED.' ..t rt PLA;,'JI' .• Mh11 :)Sli)'J . F"J3L I C SEPTEMBER l: iy MINUTES • COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Thomas Buckingham, Brian Gain, Logan Garrison, Sandra Gist, Anthone Mola, Barbara Schellert, Clark Teegarden, Joan Walker. COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None. PRESS: Cathy Burke, Record Chronicle. CITY STAFF.PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director; Willis Roberts, . Recording Secretary. 1. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chairman Walker at 8:02 p.m. ; who led the audience in the PledgE of Allegiance. 2. INTRODUCTION OF NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONER: Newly appointed Commissioner, Barbara Schellert, was introduced and • welcomed to the Commission by the Chairman. 3. ROLL CALL was taken by Acting Secretary Mola. All responded present with the exception of Commissioner Gist, who was expected to ' arrive later (arrived at 8:25 p.m. ) . 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was decided to defer approval of the minutes until the next meet- ing, October 12, 1977. OLD BUSINESS: • COUNCIL REFERRAL: PETITION TO .REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL AREA, PAR- TICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, CEDAR RIVER ON THE NORTH, THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE EAST, AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH. Noting the, petition from residents to review the Comprehensive Plah in the Renton Hill area , the Chairman requested a review by the Planning Director. Mr. Ericksen noted that the matter had been referred to the Planning Commission by the City Council . He indicated that the Commission' s area of initial concern is the Comprehensive Plan, although the referral relates to both the Comprehensive Plan and zoning in the area. He then pointed out the area under review on the Comprehen- sive Plan map and discussed the various land use designations that currently apply. The Chairman referred the Commission to the original petition from the community dated June 8, 1977, and another petition dated August 26, 1977, requesting Comprehensive Plan• review, and noted that the petitions contained a total of 237 signatures. She then called for questions from the Commission. As none were offered, the Chairman invited comments from the audience. • • Renton Planning CornComilision 116` Public Hearing Meetig September 14, 1977 Page Two Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, noted she is Chair- man of the Renton Hill Community Association and stated that the petitions submitted represented 154 out of 280 households and that more signatures were forthcoming this evening. She referred the Commission to the Renton Hill Community Association letter of September 10, 1977 , in which specific concerns and recommendations were listed. and indicated that they would be discussed more fully this evening by individual residents chosen by their neighbors. Mrs. Koelker stated that they oppose multi-family or industrial development on or in the vicinity of Renton Hill for the following reasons: it would have severe detrimental impacts; street widths • are not sufficient and have a maximum amount of traffic volume; access is, limited; parking is insufficient; it would affect the low crime rate; the historical value of Renton Hill should be pre- served; and the residents wish to maintain the pride of ownership evident in the community. She then introduced the next neighbor- hood representative, Claude Rogers. Claude Rogers, 420 Renton Avenue, Renton, discussed traffic condi- tions, noting the limited width of the streets, limited access, and potential impact on, traffic should multi-family development and/or another access occur. Margaret Jernigan, 412 Mill Avenue South, Renton, described the safety and security of the neighborhood, noting it has the lowest crime rate in the city. It is the neighborhood' s opinion that this is due to the limited access, and it is requested that the deadend streets be retained permanently. Ruth Larson, 714 High Avenue South, Renton, indicating that she was speaking for the children of the community, expressed opposition to further multi-family development, which could involve the need for additional school buses and access to the community, thus creating hazardous conditions for school children waiting for school buses . Amelia Telbin, 508 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, ,indicating that she had lived in the community for 69 years , discussed the history and development of the community and noted that it had always been a predominantly single family residential area,. She also noted that many residents are second and third generation families and asked that the integrity of the neighborhood be preserved. Jim Breda, 1002 Grant Avenue South, Renton, discussed the unique character of Renton Hill , noting that while it is an old community, it is comprised of primarily new and old single family residences and residents from a wide range of age groups , who are homeowners. He suggested that other areas of the city would be appropriate for multi-family development. Mrs . Koelker, Chairman of the Renton Hill Community Association, thanked the Commission for listening to their concerns and intro- duced their attorney, Robert McBeth, who would discuss possible solutions. Robert E. McBeth, 505E South Third Street, Renton, indicated that it is his opinion that the Commission can consider zoning because of the referral from the Council . Mr. McBeth reviewed the problems caused by further multi-family development--the need for access from two points to meet ordinance requirements , impact on traffic. impact on children' s safety, and the need to preserve the quality of the neighborhood. He stated that the community, is asking that the Comprehensive Plan be changed from multi-family designations adjacent to ,Cedar Avenue to single family. In addition, they request that there be no through streets on Renton Hill , that the R-3 zoned area be changed to single family residential , that the area of R-4 zoning be changed to a less dense designation, and that the heavy industry designation and H-1 zoning on the north side of Renton Hill be changed to single family or greenbelt. He also requested that the Commission expedite its review so that the character of the community will not be changed. con Planning Commis n Jlic Hearing Meeting cptember 14, 1977 •'age Three The Chairman noted that the public hearing this evening was adver- tised as relating to the Comprehensive Plan ; and, therefore, con- sideration is limited to that subject. The Planning Director indi- cated that the legal aspects of Planning Commission jurisdiction would be looked into. Gene Farrell , 11112 Rainier Avenue and 280 Hardie S.W. , Renton, developer of the condominiums at the south end of Cedar Avenue South, stated that while he felt Renton Hill had the attributes of a fine neighborhood, it could use some outside economic help. He indicated that it was his opinion that forcing people to seek this type of housing elsewhere would be a form of zoning discrimi- nation and reminded the Commission that condominiums are a form of single family ownership. He then described the housing being • offered and displayed a sketch of the type of development being discussed. Mr. Farrell noted the history of his involvement on Renton Hill , which includes land ownership since 1969. He dis- cussed the impact of the development with regard to view obstruc- tion, the type of purchasers anticipated, the division between single family residential development and multi-family development at Cedar Avenue South, preservation of natural areas , and a possible PUD concept. He noted that the property is properly zoned for the proposed construction and offered to work with the Planning Com- mission, City of Renton, and the community regarding its develop- ment. Questions by the Commission followed relative to access , location, size, ownership, characteristics , and current zoning of the property involved and its relationship to the city core area . The Chairman called for further questions and comments from the audience. Mario Gotti , 105 High Avenue South , Renton , stated that he is still concerned about the impact of multi-family development on access , traffic circulation, and the condition of the streets. Mary L. Gustine, 910 High Avenue South, Renton, noting that she sells real estate and is familiar with the condominium development, indicated her opposition and that of the neighborhood to further multi-family development on the Hill . Winfred K. Moore, 539 Cedar Avenue South, Renton, expressed his con- cern regarding access and undersized street widths in the area and the potential aggravation of the already congested traffic. He stated that he had chosen to live on Renton Hill because it is quiet and wished it to remain that way. L . W. Wollam, 310 Renton Avenue South, Renton, inquired if an impact statement had been required concerning the proposed development. The Planning Director advised that an impact statement may be required based on plans submitted. However, in this instance Mr. Ericksen )T said he is not aware of any plans having been submitted. 3 Ted Weber, 1502 Beacon Way South, Renton, described hazardous traf- fic conditions on Renton Avenue South. Rosemary Grassi , 422 Cedar Avenue 'South , described her concerns regard- ing 1� traffic conditions on Cedar and indicated that she would not want to buy a home across the street from a condominium. Norm Nelson, 901 Jones Avenue South , Renton, stated that his concern relates to the possibility 'of any future multi -family development. Mr. Farrell responded that plans had not been presented to the City • because he wanted to see the outcome of this review and what to expect in the way of opposition. He indicated that they desire to • respect the wishes of the community. } rRt� IP f Renton Planning Commission Public Hearing Meeting September 14, 1977 Page Four Bill Collins , 420 Cedar Avenue South , Renton, suggested that when any existing apartments on the west side of Cedar Avenue South reach the condition where they have to be replaced, a provision be made that the area is reverted to the single family zoning in the vicinity. Mr. McBeth discussed further the amenities with regard to the apart- ments already constructed, the matter of the freeway and 'topography forming a natural buffer from the downtown core, the substandard streets and traffic problems, and the impact of multi-family development on the neighborhood. John Giuliani , 1400 South 7th, Renton, asked if the Planning Commis- sion would actually visit the area and was advised by the Chairman • that they would. Noting no further audience input, IT WAS MOVED BY GAIN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. Discussion among the Commissioners followed relative to the appro- priateness of closing the hearing at this time. On the question, MOTION FAILED. • Ruth Larson asked what 'protection the community has that the project cannot be continued, if the public hearing is closed and the matter referred to committee. • The Chairman requested advice froni the Planning Director. Mr. Erick- sen stated that he would have to consult with the City Attorney regarding the zoning question, but that there is no question that the Commission can review the Comprehensive Plan, the arterial plan, and street patterns in the area. He suggested that the public hearing be continued to October 12th and the matter be referred to committee for specific report. Following a brief discussion, IT WAS • ACTION: • MOVED BY GARRISON, SECONDED BY TEEG'ARDEN, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE COMPREHENSIVE. PLAN REVIEW IN THE RENTON HILL AREA BE CONTINUED UNTIL OCTOBER 12, 1977, AND THAT- THE MATTER BE REFERRED TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK AT THAT TIME. Discussion followed concerning clarification of the Council ' s referral . It was the consensus that the elements of the Comprehen- sive Plan should be reviewed, and in the meantime, the legality of the review of the zoning would be checked. On the question, MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Teegarden, Chairman of the Comprehensive Planning Com- mittee, announced that the 'committee will meet at 7:30 p.m. on September 21 , 1977, and invited community representatives and Mr. Farrell to attend. Mr. Teegarden also asked that the Planning Director look into the question of Planning Commission review of the zoning in the subject area and advise the committee. A recess was declared by the Chairman at 10:08 p.m. The meeting was resumed at 10:30 p.m. with all 'members noted above in attendance. 5. ADMINISTRATIVE: • A. PLANNING COMMISSION ANNUAL JtEPORT • The Chairman referred the Commissioners to a final draft of the Planning Commission annual report and invited any additions, corrections , or revisions . !t RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting November 21 , 1977 Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 P.M. Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the i regular meeting to order. . ROLL CALL OF GEORGE J. PERRY, Council President; EARL CLYMER, KENNETH D. BRUCE, COUNCIL BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE. STAFF IN CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, Acting City Attorney; ATTENDANCE TED BENNETT, Deputy Finance Director; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; CAPT. BOURASA, Police Representative; DONALD CUSTER, Administrative Assistant. • PRESS GREG ANDERSON and CATHY BURKE, Renton Record Chronicle. MINUTE APPROVAL Councilwoman Thorpe requested addition Page 3, Paragraph 8, Final Estimate Asphalt Resurfacing, Line 11; add "and that project meets City standards." Councilman' Stredicke requested. Page 4, last para- graph, first line .- Remove word "committee" and add "Staff." MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMR, COUNCIL APPROVE MINUTES WITH CORRECTIONS • STATED. CARRIED. ' AUDIENCE COMMENT Council Candidate Elec.:. C. Shane, 3003 Mountain View Ave. N., objected to Council action as reported in 11/20 newspaper article that alleged . Uniformed layoff of police and fire personnel in regards to contract negotiations. Personnel 1,... Kunstle, 1015 Jones Ave. S.E, commented on same newspaper article objecting to police contract item re bonus pay for passing of physical . Heather Downs Sandy Webb, Z64 Chelan Ave. S.E. , recalled Heather Downs sewer LID Sewer LIO #297 #297 matter under discussion 11/14/77,. asked reconfirmation of original plan approved by Council 3/7/77. Marlene Vickers, 13439 S.E. 141st, Reconfirmed Co-Chairman of S.O.S. reported extensive study made and findings that Council Approval canyon area in question unsuitable for sewer trunk placement. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SLCOND THORPE, SUBJECT OF HEATHER DOWNS AREA SEWERS BE _ �IRPU(,HT TO Till COUNCIL. FLOOR. CARRIED. Councilman' Stredicke reported —' distributioh of,packet of information on subject. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNLIL RECONFIRM EARLIER ACTION OF MARCH 7, 1977 ON HEATHER DOWN SEWER LID #297. CARRIED. Senior Center Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd. S. , inquired when,Council would dis- cuss the Senior Citizens Center, being advised of planned discussion at 7:30 p.m. budget hearing 11/23/77. _�_ PUBLIC 'HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and pub- ( Renton Hill lished according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the public hearing to Comprehensive consider the Plahning Commission recommendation of the Comprehensive Plan Plan of the Renton Hill Planning Area (that area generally bound by I FAI-405 on the West, Cedar River on the North, the hillside and undevel- oped area on the East and the powenline right-of-way on the South. Letter from Planning Director Ericksen submitted Planning Commission . recommendations per Council request of 6/6/77. The letter explained the process of hearings and work meetings with detailed analysis of land use, circulation and community facilities; explaining the Conriris- i sion had adopted the .Comprehensive Planning Committee recorrnnendatio' at conclusion of public hearing 10/12/77. Letter from Kathy Keolker•, 532 'Cedar Ave. S., President, Renton Hill Community Association, sub- . mitted statement •listing concerns of Renton Hill residents and favored the Planning Commission recommendation re the Comprehensive Plan. Petition bearing 227 signatures of Renton Hill residents and property owners expressed opposition to the building of any additional multiple • II dwellings at the upper end of Cedar Ave. S. or any adjacent area that would.require access through our community. (Petition originally filed with Planning Commission 8/26/77.) Petition bearing 28 signatures pro- 1 tested rezoning Mill Ave. S. from R-3 multi-family residential to R-1 • 1 single-family, having been so zoned since 1964. Document prepared by RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING I:xAMINL•R EXHIBIT NO, 8 JUN 1 8 1978 AM PM ITEM NO. /g/-7g- 7g A • • Renton City Council 11/21/71 Page 2 Pu is Hearing - Continued Comprehensive Transamerica Development with letter from Patricia Parks, Attorney, Plan for. obiected to change in comprehensive plan designating the Renton Hills Renton Hill area . s single family residential area (R-1), noting Transamerica Continued owns 10.05 acres at the south end of Cedar Ave. S. designated as R-3. • The letter explained proposed sale of 6.67 acres for 90 unit four- plex condominium and explained degree of steepness of property and A that property abuttsFAl-405, making the property suitable for multi- • family residential use. The letter.alleged loss of value of property in change from R-3 to R-1; an attached traffic study claimed 5On use • of optimum design for Cedar Ave. S. , suggesting means for increasing efficiency of traffic circulation, such as one way street`and removing one 6'z ft. sidewalk. Planning Director Ericksen used charts, maps and • .slides to present review of area, the nature of Comprehensive Plan, and Planning Commission recommendation, also distributing maps and written recommendation for audience use. Mr. Ericksen explained the land use element findings, circulation and community facilities, and recommendations of the Planning Commission for single family residen- tial for area north of Puget Sound transmission right-of-way; add greenbelt area-steep hillside areas, powerline and natural drainage courses; delete Hill Ave. S. extention and Grant Ave. connection with continued limited access; area north of railroad designated multi- family be resignated as future recreation. Continued -- Persons present sueakinc in favor of Planning Commission recommendation: Historic Kathy Keolker; Claude 5--ors, 420 Renton Ave. S.; Ruth Larson, 714 Unique High Ave. S.; Ethel Tel'•vr. 508 Cedar Ave. S. : Jim Breda, 1002 Grant Neighborhood Ave. S.; Mario Gatti , 10(:5 High Ave. S. Persons opposing recommendation: Desires Bill Montangne,Vice-President Transamerica Development Co.; Gene • Single-Family Farrell, 11112 Rainier Ave. S. , developer and purchaser of Trans- Residential america property; Patricia Parks, 118 N. 40th, Seattle, Persons • Area present speaki•, against chance in zoning of Mill Ave."S. from multi- . family to sicc;'e-family residential: Mrs. Ray Hansen, 336 Mill Ave. S. ; Anita Thelanrler, 512 Mill Ave. S.; Paul Von Beck, 18184 S.E. 41st Place, Issaquah, Wash. Also speaking in favor of the recommendation: Robert McBeth, Attorney for Renton Hill Community Association, 505B • South 3rd. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PL.ANNING. COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ELIMINATING EXTENSION OF MILL AVE. S. AND GRANT AVE. S. , CHANGING DESIGNATION OF ALL OF RENTON HILL FROM MULTI-FAMILY TO SINGLE-FAMILY WITH EXCEPTION OF MiLL AVENUE SOUTH • TO SOUTH SEVENTH STREET AND THAT THE AREA VHiCH IS OCCUPIED BY GLADDING McBEAN (Interpace) BE .DESIGNATED AS RECREATIONAL. CARRIED. See later. Recess MOVED BY BRUCE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Council recessed at 10:01 p.m. and reconvened at 10:14 p.m. Roll Call : All Council Members present. Renton Hill MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF RENTON Zoning HILL. ZONING TO THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER,, COUNCIL REFER MATTER OF ORDINANCE AND MORITORIUM Renton Hill (ON BUILDING OF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE RENTON HILL AREA) Moratorium TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO EVALUATE AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL. Councilman Stredicke noted Consent Agenda item - letter from Rolling ;Rolling Hills Hills Homeowners Association requested moratorium on multi-family Moratorium building for 90 days or until Planning Commission completes study of area east of Renton Hill bounded by power line transmission on North, Benson Road on West, Puget Drive on South and.Edmonds S.E. on the East. (See later Consent Agenda) MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, 'AMEND MOTION TO INCLUDE LETTER FROM ROLLING HILLS HOMEOWNERS AND MORATORIUM IN THE REFERRAL. THE AMENDING MOTION CARRIED. MOTION AS AMENDED, CARRIED. (See Page 6 and Page 7.) • ORDINANCES MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH,, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE AND RESOLUTIONS ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS TO BE READ AT THIS TIME. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE, Council go into Executive Session to consider property value required prior to adoption of resolution. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, HATTER OF EXECUTIVE SESSION BE TABLED UNTIL NEW • BUSINESS ON THE AGENDA. CARRIED. MOTION TO SUSPEND RULES, CARRIED. r enton city Council • 11/28/77 Page 5 • )rdinances and Resolution: - Continued iarbage Rate COUNCIL 'ADOPT THE 3RDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL.: 3-AYES: CLYMER, )rdinance r ,. -!: STREDIC�', THORPE: 2-NO'S: PERRY AND SHINPOCH. According to :ontinued ,:.jo ''7f statute, majority vote of Council membership is required to pass an ordanc3 into law. MOTION FAILED. Ordinance returned to the Ways and Means Committee for one week. :enton Hill—l'7't/""-''Tie"17ays and Means Committee recommended first reading and referral :omprehensive Plan hack to committee of the following ordinances; 'rdinance An ordinance was presented amending the C;ty's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Maps and data relating to Renton Hill vicinity. Follow • - ing reading, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE. BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. N) . r_..�,._ ._. ...._._:...,.._........... .._...... - ----- imi ted G.O. Bonds An ordinance was presented providing for,_. issuance-e- .a__..-a l•the issuance and sale of-- enior Center $900,000.par value "Limited General Obligation Bonds, 1978" providing a part of .Funds for cost of land acquisition and con- •,:i.-' struction of a Senior Citizens Center and appurtenances. Follow- ing reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL • ' • REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO COMMITTEE FOR ONE WEEK. 'Substitute • motion by Thorpe, to advance the ordinance to second and final readings, failed for lack of a second. Councilwoman Seymour- Thorpe then stated for the record, Council has been advised ' that interest rates will not he declining, but increasing, that . early adoption would mean lower interest; also that public has ex- • . pressed opinions at committee and council meetings, that the only , ' objections received were -i,om people outside the City limits and urged Council action. MO!IC:N CARRIED returning ordinance to the • Ways and Means Committee. esolut.ion #2149 The Ways and Means Committee recommended reading and adoption of inal Plat a resolution whicH approved Macnherson's Inc. , Ruddell 's 2nd uddell's 2nd Addn. Addition final plat FP-037-77; property located at the Northeast iv corner of Monroe 'rve. N.E. and N.E. 10th St. . Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION . AS READ. CARRIED. IJDIENCE COMMENT Frank Cenkovich, ?625 Benson Rd.S., inquired regarding bonds for _____------ the Senior Citizen Centers being advised by Councilman Clymer that general obligation binds are voted b-v citizens for property enior Center Bonds tax, however, that couricilmanic or limited general obligation bonds Which were before the Council tonight and will be presented next week, are paid from the Cit 's general revenue and are presented to the Council for approval. • oiling Hills Jim McClelland, 1922 Jones t. S.E. , representing Rolling Hills oratorium Homeowners Assoc. inquired re committee discussion of moratorium, . • being advised by Committee Chairman Perry of the schedule. (Attached) 978 Budget . . Charles Shane, 3003 Mt. View N., made inquiries of the 1978 budget and asked that B & 0 tax be adopted. ' xecutive Session MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SES- SION IN THE 6TH FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. CARRIED. The Council Members left the Chambers at 10:10 p.m. and returned at 11:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: All Members present as previously shown. Motion by Stredicke, Second !,.hinpoch,. to adjourn the meeting, failed. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND NOT OBSERVE 11:00 p.m. CLOSING RULE. CARRIED. • ouncil Position Councilman Perry expressed disappointment that newly.elected Coun- illed oilman Thomas Trimm was unable to attend meeting for swearing in; homas Trim inquiring concerning any date requirement for certification. Moved by Stredicke, Second Thorpe, continue meeting to next week. SUB • - STITUTE MOTION BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL APPOINT THOMAS • TRIMM TO FILL VACANT COUNCIL POSITION, FORMERLY HELD BY WILLIAM GRAN. CARRIED. • DJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH, MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED.. 1 :13 p.m. Delores A. Mead, City Clerk • (• sJ Renton City, Council • 12/5/77 Page 5 Old Business - Continued 4,1 Repainting 3/4 MG Highlands Elevated Tank and the 3 MG Mt. Olivet Reservoir. Bid Approved Public Works Director Gonnason advised approval interpreted and bid awarded , Attorney indicating procedure legal. Seminar Councilwoman Thorpe called attention to Surface Water, Green River Basin, Seminar in Auburn 12/14/77, asking Planning Director be notified. Ma..Jer Gelaurerrti noted he will be participating on the • panel. Christmas .Councilman Stredicke complimented Mayor and Staff on working with Decorations Downtown Merchants on Christmas lighting change over. The Mayor noted attempt will be made for television coverage. Public Services Public Services Committee Chairman Bruce submitted committee report Committee Report noted review of Brad McElroy request to connect to the City's sewer system and noted McElroy ins executed a covenant to annex ' and is included in the nropo-,ed Ic:ett.i annexation for.which peti- tions ar' being prepared for circi:ration; The committee recom- mended application be approved subject to limitation of single lateral for single family Unit .and access to the property be ' ' limited to a• single driveway. The report also recommended notifi- cation of adjacent property owners as to the proposal. MOVED BY • :r- ' BRUCE, ' SECOND SHINPOCH, Counci concur .in the committee report. ROLL. CALL VOTE: 2-AYES: SHi%!POC,H AND BRUCE; 5-NO's: PERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, TRIMM AND CLYMER. MOTION FAILED. MOVED BY STREDICKE,' ' SECOND PERRY, CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO NOTIFY McELROY ASKING FOR ANNEXATION PRIOR TO CONNECT+ON TO SEWER SERVICE. CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE,. NO FURTHER CONNECTIONS OUTSIDE .THE f ✓ CITY FOR SEWER SERVICE BE ENTERTAINED UNLESS THERE IS EXTREME, �p1 CERTIFIED HEALTH HA7ARD.'"' Councilwoman Thorpe noted this applies to existing structures, no new construction being allowed to con- ;,` Sewer Connections rect. Ilona; inquiry by Councilman Trim;?, Public Works Director to Property Out- Gonna;nn mated previrrusly- adoeraa , esalution clarifying thos.e Side City Limits propo t:ic'; -.;i;;rcen,. 9 sewer iira ill City would be allowed to con- Disallowed Unless nect upon ' cdings of health n+zaro; these last few items before Extreme Health the Council requiring extension of lines in order to connect. ----- Hazard Gonnason asked that resolution he rescinded if policy changed. • Gonnason, noted neea for septic tanks for new construction in event of change of policy, noting late comer's agreement paid in event of connections in the past. Councilman Clymer disapproved of septic tanks. *!-MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER SUBJECT MATILR TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. --— . Elk Ridge Drive The Public Services Committee report recommended denial 'of request \ , Name Change to change the"rame of Eagle Ridge Drive to Elk Ridge Drive, suggest- Denied ing alternate proposal to deed the entry way.of the Elks Club to the. City to name "Elk Ridge Drive"or pursue other similar approach for better identity. MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND STREDICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. ' City Hall The committee report noted review of the Public Works Departiment r1,� Heating System request for modification to the City Hall heating system and Modifications installation of the Vertrex Energy Manager system; the Mayor's Approved Committee of Energy Conservation also reviewed the proposal and recommended favorably. The coinmittee.report recommended' Council concurrence ea the modifications and installation and that the Matter be referred to the Ways_and Means Committee for appropria- tion of funds within the limitations,of the existing budget. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilman Perry noted review of Council procedure ordinance and Council Procedures asked that each Council Members, the Mayor and City Clerk review the ordinance also; requesting adherence to the rules. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: _ ... �, .d_---^�• -°'�"•• ' Ordinance #3186 The Ways and Means Committee Chairman, Earl Clymer, presented coni- el�nton—FfiTT mittee.report recorrunending second and final readings of an ordinance Comprehensive Plan amending the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan of Renton Hill area. C Renton City Council 12/5/77 Page 6 Ordinances and Resolutions Continued Ordinance #3186 First reading of the ordinance was 11/28/77. City Clerk Mead ' . Continued the ordinance designating area as single-family and multi-family Renton Hill residential, greenbelt and recreational; also deleting Mill Ave. S Comprehensive extension and Grant Ave. S. as being impractical and inappropriate. Plan Following readings, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES except Councilman Bruce was not present during the Roll Call. MOTION CARRIED. `""Riss"oTution #2150 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended reading and adop- ✓Housing & tion of the following resolutions: Resolution was read adopting y,t ' Community ' the 1978 Housing and Community Development Program; Public Hearings Development held 11/28/77 and 12/5/77. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL Block Grants ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2151 Resolution was read allowing Teleprompter to merge its subsidiary Teleprompter TV companies under the name of Northwest Cablevision. MOVED BY Merger CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2152 Resolution was read extending the Renton Hill building moratorium Moratorium on multi-family residences for a period of 90 days. MOVED BY OY Renton Hill Area CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. Councilman Stredicke requested that the Administration look • at the access problems on Renton Hill; Mayor Delaurenti assigned Public Works Director. MOTION CARRIED. • Ordinance #3187 MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECONSIDER ACTION'TAKEN Garbage Collection 11/28/77 CONCERNING THE GARGABE. ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Following Rate Increase readings of the ordinance, MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL First Reading of ADOPT ORDINANCE.{ Councilwoman Thorpe requested Administration Ordinance 11/21 include information to residential users with billing - how'to obtain one can rate. Councilman Perry requested for the record, 1� percentage of increase, explaining garbage franchise stipulation r r that the contract would be open for renegotiation if rates increase above 20-30;' infive-year period. Gonnason explained rate increase due to increase In County dump fees - one can 4.1%.increase; 2 can increase; additional cans 12% increase (within 25 ft.). Gonnason ended list with 2-yard container, 22%. Councilman Stredicke requested report listing increases for various industrial • concerns 1975-78. Gonnason explained cost-of-living clause in contract for drivers, which may mean increase in'costs within six months. Councilwoman Shinpoch asked the alternatives to one-bidder award situation. Councilwoman Thorpe noted recycling studies. • • ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: THORPE, SHINPOCH BRUCE AND CLYMER; 2-NO: PERRY AND STREDICKE; 1-ABSTAIN DUE ,TO INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION: TRIMM. *MOTION CARRIED. Stredicke encouraged recycling, outlining processes. • Executive Session MOVED BY PFR1Y, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL MEET IN EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSE OF DISCUSSING WAGE NEGOTIATIONS. CARRIED. Council President Perry requested audience and Staff Members leave the Chambers. Time: 10:30 p.m. Council convened at 10:48 p.m. All Council Members present at Roll Call. •Greetings Councilwoman Thorpe extended Happy Hanukkah greetings, asking t'o he noted in the record. • • ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL ADJOURN THE MEETING. CARRIED. Time: 10:50 p.m. • /..‘*r(,1fJ f 71(' .(3c. Delores A. Mead, City Clerk <r. • • C . • *-Renton City,Council . . 12/19/77 Page 3 • Correspondence and Current. Business - Continued . Rezone Appeal S110 fee plus S25 appeal fee. i1OTION CARRIED adopting committee recom Ray Ball mendations. Thorpe asked her NO voice vote be recorded. • Leslie Adams . Letter from Acting City Attorney Warren advised he appeared in: • . Court Case #828227 Superior Court on 12/8/77 to argue the Writ of Certiorari on the ' McLaughlin Rezone McLaughlin Rezone filed by Leslie Adams, et ux vs City of Renton. Appeal R 001-77, The letter explained Judge's decision that the City's actions were not arbitrary and capricious and therefore dismissed the Writ. Copy of trial brief and pertinent documents included. Information Traffic Signals - Letter from Carl Wyatt, President of the Renton Shopping Center, Inc. , 01 Renton Shopping Merchant's Association, called attention to several restrictive and Center unsafe features in the traffic signal control system adjacent to the Center. (1) Intersection of Rainier Ave. S. and S. 3rd..; lengthen- ing of left turn signal time and east-west walk signal time requested. (2) Intersection of Sunset Blvd. , Langston Rd. , and Hardie St.; re- , 'quested lengthing of time for both left turn signal and north-south Walk signal. (3) Intersection of'Rainier Ave. S. and S. 4th Pl.; requested construction of a left turn storage lane for northbound . traffic on, Rainier Ave. S. to allow left turn into Center. MOVED BY STREDiCKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE ADMINIS- TRATION FOR RECOMMENDATION BACK TO THE _PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE. • CARRIED. Human Rights L.ette:. om Albert fatiey, Chairperson of the Renton Human Rights . • t - Ordinance and Afra'.rs Commission, submitted 'an ordinance amending Title 11, Chapter O Of the City Code setting forth duties and procedures.of the Human Rights and Affairs Commission. The•letter explained the tWo public hearings held by the commission, ordinance having been drafted with assistance of former City Attorney Shelian and City • Attorney "hrten. ' The lei.'.er "'ot... c're WasP:ington .State Human Ripots Conum s s i jn ,.:d attnrnci nave deternTi ned it is satisfactory to provide • for inter-agency cooperation in the processing of complaints. Refer- ral to the Ways and Means Committee recommended: MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL. CONCUR AND REFER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM- ' MITTEE. CARRIED. , Appointment Letter .from Mayor Delaurenti appointed Richard Geissler to the Fire Chief permanent position of Fire Chief for the City effective 1/1/78, asking confirmation, by the City Council. The letter noted successful completion of the six-month probationary period by Chief Geissler as of 1/1/78. MOVED BY BRUCE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN APPOINT • - MENT. CARRIED. k. """ . "'." ,Motio,n, by Stredicke, second hy,_Shinpoch,y,for„recess,`Failed. Usery . OLD BUSINESS ..,�. . .... ...,:. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry, Submitted committee Develo_pment report recommending that the Council refer the Matter of'the zoning f Committee Report on. Renton Hill to the Planning Department. to review the Comprehen- Renton Hill ive Plan changes recently passed t,y the Council and the zoning r.: Y} /' Zoning the Renton ili I ! area to•dete•O e those parcels of lend bearing different zoning classifications.than those permissible in the .\ • . amended 'Comprehensive Plan. The report.noted the Planning Dept. . would then initiate rezoning requests where parcels do not conform with proposed uses'of the amended plan and would prepare..the necessary , reports; the Hearing Examiner to determ.ine,after a public hearing, whether or not the parcels identifierd,bv the Planning Department should he rezoned.. MOUEP i?Y E•1_RRY., SECOND STRE;rICKE, COUNCIL CONCUR 1N THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE HiANN1NG. AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE.. Upon ;rc•.iiry by Counci.lwoMan Thorpe on nre;r; wh•:rr•e application had been made. prior to the riroratorium, Acting City Attorney Warren advised of prior • • ..._,....., w. . .: ... . Yvestedryri gifts.,.,..MOTION wCARRI ED_.... South Renton the committee report recommended Cbuncil 'concurrence in the ,Planning lT Comprehensive Coimrission recommendations for South Renton Comprehensive Planning ' ` `� 'Plan Area Area subject to the follow: (1)..Designate a lineal' greenbelt' area : • along West side of proposed SR 515 extending southerly from S 27th St. to SE 172nd St. ; (2) Include buffer of low density multi-family r .i , . s 'N • • ROGER L sHIDLER SHIDLER, McBROOM, GATES & BALDWIN (206) 223-4666 GEORGE W. McSROOM WILLIAM H. GATES LAW OFFICES WILLIAM F. BALDWIN 1000 NORTON BUILO.NG JAMES R. IRWIN • JAMES C. M,DDLEBROOKS SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 RICHARD B. DODD • FREDERICK ROSS BOUNDY WILLIAM H. NEUKOM JAMES L. FLETCHER June 9 , 1978 CRAIG V. WENTZ DAVID T. MCDONALD PATRICIA J. PARKS DALE K. ROUND'? GARY D. HUFF WILLIAM A. BUTLER • DAVID H. BINNEY Mr. L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner City of Renton Municipal Building • 20.0 Mill Avenue S . Renton , Wa , 98055 Re : City of Renton, File No. R-178-78 Application for Rezone from R-3 to • R-1. Dear Examiner Beeler: • We represent Transamerica Development Corporation . En- closed for filing is the original and one copy of a brief in opposition to the proposed rezone . Yours sincerely , 4,4,1•24 mes R. Irwin JRI/ds Enc. cc : Lawrence J . rqar.ren , City Attorney Uillia.m Montaigne RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON • HEARING EXAMINER JUN 91978 AM P,4} r� �:)r1Aillil2i 1 i21:3ii:ilfi • EXHIBIT NO. _,• ITEM O. _ _ • RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEAbi-:;; r XAMiNER JU1: 31978 AM PM 1 7,8,9,10,11,12,112►3,4,5,6 2 3 ' • ' 4 IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE L. RICK. BEELER, HEARING EXAMINER . 5 In Re ) 6 CITY OF RENTON REZONE ) 7• APPLICATION ) File No. R-178-78 MEMORANDUM BY TRANSAMERICA • 8 ) DEVELOPMENT COMPANY IN OPPOSITION TO THE, CITY OF 9 ) RENTON'S APPLICATION FOR 10 ) REZONE FROM R-3 to R-1 ' 11 Transamerica Development Company ("TADCO") respectfully 12 submits the following memorandum in opposition to the application • 13 of the City of Renton to downzone its property. • `'• 14 151 INTRODUCTION 161 TADCO owns approximately 11-1/4 acres of property in • 171Renton presently zoned R-3. The location of the property is a,. 18 shown on Exhibit A attached hereto. TADCO's holdings represent 1 - 19 by far :Ole greater portion of the property to be affected by the • ;` r. 20 downzone. 211 ' On December 5, 1977, the City Council adopted an ordinance 221amending the City's Comprehensive Plan for the area in which 1 23jTADCO's property is situated, and, in.addition, passed a resolu- 1 24tion extending the Renton Hill building.moratorium on multi- • 25 family residences for a period of 90 days. The ordinance, as 261adopted by the Council, deleted the property located on Mill . 27.: Avenue to the north of TADCO's property from the proposed 281downzoning. Thus, the only property in the vicinity affected by 29 the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan was TADCO's property. ' 30 On December 27, 1977, TADCO filed an application in the 31 Superior Court of King County for a Writ of Certiorari directed ' 32 MEMORANDUM - 1 LAW GI(ICES or SHIDLER.McSROOM.GATES&RALDWIN ' 1111111 NOIOON BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 223-4666 II I'1 • I + 1 4 V 4 5 1 6' 1 to the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Renton and to the C,; 9 At 2 City Council with respect to the action taken on December 5, 8 3 1977. 9 4 On December 27, 1977, the Honorable Stanley C. Soderland 20 5 issued a Writ of Certiorari to the City of Renton. On January 11, 22 � 6 1978, the Honorable William C. Goodloe entered an order on show 22 7 cause, which ordered that: Submit . 23 of 8 "1. The writ of certiorari issued on December 27, 1977, to the the City of Renton, is confirmed; 9 2. . All proceedings pertinent to the amendment of the 5 10 Comprehensive Plan for Renton Hills, including zoning hearing, are stayed and prohibited until the final determina- TAD! 11 tion herein; Rent 12 3. All moratoria on the construction of multi-family °" structures in Renton are stayed and prohibited until the • 13 final determination herein; and 'how" o" i. Y f 14 4. Plaintiff posts an injunction bond in the amount of ar thF. i $500.00. w"Zone. 15 0 161 Subsequently, in February of 1978,. a Stipulation and Order " Deg ldi 17 modifying the stay of proceedings was entered in the King County "g th.e p1s 18 Superior Court action. The stipulation provided that the stay Aron : 19 of proceedings should be lifted to allow the City of Renton to exte"di.'• . ze 20 conduct the necessary rezoning hearings, subject to TADCO's Sidei by th,, 21 right to request that all the initial records for the Comprehensive 22 ;Plan change, plus any records from the Land Use Hearing Examiner's to the 231decision in the zoning action, together with follow-up City "g• Thu 24 Council action, be certified to the Superior Court for consolidated lme"t to c 25 review. A copy of the Stipulation and Order Modifying Stay of ember ourt of 26 Proceedings is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 27 On May 23, 1978, the City of Renton filed this application 28 for rezone of TADCO's property from R-3 to R-1. ' 1 29 TADCO contends that the application to downzone its property • 30 is arbitrary and capricious and should be denied for the following 31 reasons: 32 MEMORANDUM - 2 LAW OH ICLS OF SHIDLER.McBROOM.GATES&BALDWIN WOO NOIIION 111111 DING SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98109 223.4Glili II 1 . 0 1 property in 1965 from Puget Western. The purchase price, of 2 course, reflected the fact that the property was then zoned R-3. 3 TADCO has paid real estate taxes on the property since that time 4 at an assessed valuation which takes into account uses permitted 5 under R-3 zoning. 6 The property itself is located on a steep west slope, and 7 is cut up by a drainageway. The steepness of the slopes raises 8 the development cost for the property considerably. According 9 to a November appraisal, the property has a value of approximately 10 $18,000/acre zoned R-3 and only. $2,250/acre zoned R-1. The . 11 proposed downzone thus reduces the property's value to a little . 1 12 over 12% of its previous worth. Property values have substantially 1F 13 increased since the last appraisal, and the present market value 19 14 of the property zoned as R-3 is approximately $25,000.00 an 20 15 acre. Thus, the proposed downzoning will result in damages to 21 16 TADCO in excess of $200,000. 22 1 17 Access to the TADCO property is along Cedar Avenue South. 23 d r 18 This street is approximately 27 feet wide. Parking is permitted 24 Cck 19 on both sides of the street. The street dead-ends at TADCO's 25 re 20 property. In 1976, the residents of Cedar Avenue South were 26 Pr' 21 surveyed as to their wishes regarding restricting parking on one 27 22 side of the street. Due to a tie, no restriction was imposed. 28 for 23 Since the property has considerable unusable portions, any 29 24 multi-family use thereon would likely be fairly low density. 30 is e 25 The development envisioned by a potential purchaser from TADCO 31 reai 26 called for approximately 90 units, probably in the form of four- 32 27 plexes. That number may be high, given the nature of the MEM( 28 property. 29 A traffic study commissioned by TADCO reveals that the 30 additional development would not unduly add to congestion on 31 Cedar Avenue South; however, it also makes suggestions on the 32 MEMORANDUM - 4 i nW of I Iccs of SHIDLER.McBROOM,GATES&BALDWIN 111110 NOIIION OOILDINII SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 223.461,11 II ' + I llalleviation of the problem, such as widening the street, restrict- 2ling parking during peak hours, and making the street one way, 3 with Renton Avenue South one way in the opposite direction. 4 Immediately adjacent and to the north of TADCO's property 5 is a recently completed eight unit condominium. North of that 6 is the area along Mill Avenue south that was deleted from inclusion 7 in the downzone area. Mill Avenue is narrower than Cedar Avenue, 8 consisting of two one-way levels. This area is more conducive 9 to development, as compared to TADCO's property, as a single 10 family residential area (single family homes make up the bulk of 11 the property use there now.) There is a multi-family complex at • 12 the north end of Mill Street, abutting the TADCO property. 13 • Adjacent to TADCO's property to the west is. I-405, and 14 beyond that, Renton's commercial district. 15 On June 6, 1977, a petition signed by some residents of 9 '� 16 Renton Hill, which asked that all property on Cedar Avenue South 17 be rezoned to single-family residential, was delivered to the ?? 18 Mayor's office of the City of Renton. On that same date, the 19 City Council voted to refer the petition to the Planning Commission 20 and Hearing Examiner for review and recommendations. 21 On September 14, 1977, the Planning Commission held a 22 public hearing for the specific purpose of reviewing the designated 23 multi-family residential uses in the Renton Hill area where 24 TADCO's property is situated. TADCO received no notification of 25 that hearing. A prospective purchaser of TADCO's property did 26 hear of it, and of the petition to redesignate the property on 271the Comprehensive Plan, and notified a representative of TADCO 28 of this shortly before the hearing date. However, this lack of 29 notice seriously prejudiced TADCO's ability to prepare in a 30 meaningful manner to present its point of view at the Planning 31' Commission hearing. 32. MEMORANDUM - 5 LAW of 1!CI 01 SHIDLER.McBROOM.GATES&BALDWIN 1000 NGIIION BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 221-4000 1 i i i I 1 The proponents of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the 2 City knew that TADCO intended to sell its property in the study 3 area for development under the R-3 use classification. 4 On 'October 12, 1977, after reviewing the staff and committee 5 reports, the Planning Commission, by a 4-2 vote, recommended to 6 the City Council that the Comprehensive Plan of the City of 7 Renton be amended to reflect only R-1 use in the Renton Hills 8 area. 9 On November 21, 1977, the City Council unanimously voted to 3 10 change the Comprehensive Plan substantially as recommended by 1. -11 the Planning, Commission. ,The principal difference was the 16 12 elimination from the rezone property of the area north of South . 17 13 7th Street. The Planning Commission had recommended that the 18 t F9 14 property between Renton Hill and the freeway along Mill Avenue • y 15 South be downzoned as well. The City Council, in response to a 0 cI ri 16 petition submitted by Mill Avenue residents, deleted that area • 17 from its Comprehensive Plan amendment. As a result, only about i Pla F 18 twelve acres are subject to this proposed rezone, over eleven of is !dec {.. 19 which are owned by TADCO. Moreover, the property to the north Cour 20 has already been developed into condominiums, and would not be revi, 21 as adversely affected by the proposed downzoning. )rocE 22 On December 5, 1977, after the second and final reading of ( 23 the ordinance changing the Comprehensive Plan, the City Council )rre 24 gave its final approval to the Comprehensive Plan amendment, TO 25 which resulted in designating TADCO's property for R-1 uses. arbi 26 On December 5, 1977, the City Council also extended a sons: 27 moratorium, prohibiting the construction or alteration of multi- 28 family uses in the Renton Hill area. >RANDL — 29 At no time in the decision-making process did the City 30 Planning Commission, Planning Staff, or the City Council, make 31 the environmental threshold determination required under the 32 State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. MEMORANDUM - 6 ' LAW OIFICLS GL SHIDLER.McBROOM.GATES 6 BALDWIN I1100 NOBION BUILDING SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 220-41(66 Y i R 0 4 1 LAW AND ARGUMENT 6 c. 2 A. The City of Renton Must Demonstrate That Conditions in 7 AF 3 Renton Hills Neighborhood Have Changed so Markedly That a Rezone E 4 is Required in the Public Interest. 9 5 An application for a rezoning\differs considerably from an IO 6 original comprehensive zoning action. An original comprehensive 12 7 zoning action is. legislative in nature (Fleming v. Tacoma, 81 I2 Submit .8 Wn.2d 292, 502 P.2d 327 (1972) ) and its validity is to be 13 Of the $ presumed absent a manifest abuse of discretion (Farrell v. 4 10 Seattle, 72 Wn.2d 590, 452 P.2d 965 (1971)) . A rezone, however, 5 11 presents a different standard for consideration. In the recent TAD( 12 case of Parkridge v. Seattle, 89 Wn.2d 454 (January, 1978) , the Renton pr, 131Supreme Court made the following distinction: hOv1'n on E 14 "In a rezone action, adjudicatory in nature, the required relationship to the public interest is not to be far the 15 � presumed as it would be in an original comprehensive zoning action by the city council, which we have held to be "zone. .16 ! legislative in nature." (at p. 460) . on Dece 17 !The Court went on to quote from State ex rel. Synod of Ohio of Id2ng the 18 United Lutheran Church in America v. Joseph, 139 Ohio 229, 39 grope 19 N.E.2d 515 (1942) : "In oxt�ndzng 20 acts and policies lmay ng wbetupheld,her resp id administrative tshouldents' beobservedthat resi 211 the usual presumption of the validity of the acts of public deny boards and official , does not apply to acts involving the by t 22 forfeiture of an individual's rights or, the depriving him he of the free use of his property. . . . Applying this exception :° the no; 23 ' to a case like the one at bar, where public officials seek under a 'zoning ordinance to deny a landowner. a particular Ig. Thu 24 ' use of his property, the highest court of Maryland has held S that the board of zoning appeals has the burden of showing neat t° t 25 reasons sufficient to support its authority in refusing a building permit." (Parkridge, pp. 460-61) ember 2• 26 . Ii urt of 27' Since this rezoning unquestionably deprives Transamerica of 28ithe free use of its property, the City of Renton has the burden 291of showing sufficient reasons why this rezone should occur. 30 The Court in Parkridge went on to state at p. 463: 31 "In considering the evidence, we note that (1) there is no presumption of validity favoring the action of 32 rezoning; (2) the proponents of the rezone have the burden SE MEMORANDUM - 7 I AW OI rIc[S Of SHIDLER.McBROOM,GATES&BALDWIN IIIW NOBfON BUILDING SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 72:1-4606 II / . • 3 • 5 1 of proof in demonstrating that conditions have substantially • changed since the original zoning, or as in this 6 2 case, . and (3) the rezone must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals or 7 Al 3 welfare." (Parkridge at p. 4'63) 8 4 The facts of the Parkridge case parallel the facts here 9 5 rather closely. Parkridge owned ten lots near Volunteer Park in 10 6. Seattle which had been zoned for apartment construction since 21 7 1959. In 1974, Parkridge proposed developing a 60-unit apartment submi, 8 building on his property. Shortly thereafter, the Seattle City f Of the 9 Council passed an ordinance. rezoning the area single-family 10 residential. The trial court in that case held that (1) the 11 decision was unsupported by credible evidence, (2) the rezoning . TAD 12. resulted in an inverse spot zone, (3) proper procedures had not 'nton p2 131been followed, and (4) the City failed to comply with SEPA. The )wn oh. i 14 .Supreme Court affirmed on the first ground, not discussing the • Far the 15 other three. After reviewing the record before, in that case, zone. 16 the Seattle City Council, the Court found that the evidence did On Dec 17 not hg the 18 ". . . establish that conditions had so markedly changed that a rezone was required in the public anterest." (p. 462) Prop, , 19 20 A copy of the complete text of this opinion is attached - ndin 21 hereto as Exhibit C. si den, Y the 22 Thus the City of Renton, to sustain its rezoning ordinance the 23 at this hearing, must show that conditions in Renton Hills have 3102 24 changed so markedly that the public interest required a change Thus, 25 in zoning. to t. 26 , B. No Marked Change in Conditions Has Occurred in the rther 22 27 , Renton Hills Neighborhood Justifying This Rezone Since of R2 281Original Comprehensive Plan Was Adopted. 29 A review of the Planning Commission Report (on which this 30. rezone application is ultimately based) seems to indicate that 31 Renton's primary concern is increased traffic in the area of 32 MEMORANDUM - 8 I AW 01 FICLS OF. SHIDLER.McBROOM,GATES 4 BALDWIN 111110 NOBION BUILDING SEATTLE,WASHINGTON 98104 223.1666 414 410. Or Cedar and Mill Streets. Yet the evidence will show that the .5 2 Renton Hills neighborhood is not substantially more crowded than 6 A 3 it was in 1964. Access is the same as it was in the mid- & 4 sixties. Renton may point to the expanded use of a park on the 9 5 top of the hill, but Cedar Street is not used by people going jo 6 there. In short, the evidence will be that no significant 12 7 change has occurred in the neighborhood calling for the exercise 12 8 of the City's police power in the form of a down-zone. In 1964, S w, 3 9 the City evaluated the Renton Hill area in a valid exercise of Of till 10 its legislative function, and decided that the Hill area should 11 be zoned R-3. TADCO acquired its property in reliance on that 12 determination. Now the City has "changed its mind,"' and its TA tOn 13 reasons for doing so are not related to significant changes in 14 neighborhood conditions. The rezone application should be own on far th 15 disapproved. 0 16 C. The Proposed Rezone is Unconstitutional as a Confisca- a ne• 17 tion of TADCO's Property. On be 18 The general rule is that an ordinance which deprives a 429. tp 19landowner of the entire use value of his property is pro 20 unconstitutional. Anderson 1 American Law of Zoning, § 3.26,Fenda �, 21 p. 146, Elmwood Properties, Inc. v. Congelman, 418 F.2d 1025 •,Sider; 22 (7th Cir. , 1969) . the 231 "Thus regulations restricting land to residential use have the no been held unconstitutional where the value of the land for 24 such purpose has been destroyed or drastically reduced b • • adjacent . . . major highways, and by the physical Thus 25 condition of the land." (Anderson su ra. 't to 1 ?6 emphasis supplied) . ' P pp. 152-3, fiber 2 27 The evidence will show that the adjacency of Interstate 405 - of R 28 and the topographical unsuitability of the land itself combine 29 here to reduce the value of TADCO's property zoned R-1 to less 30 than 1/10 of its present R-3 zoned value. 31 This is not the typical case, as presented by Mayer Built 32 Homes v. Steilacoom, 17 Wn. App.— ---- 558 (1977) , where the landowner MEMORANDUM - 9 1 AW OFFICES OF SHIDLER.McBROOM,GATES S BALDWIN 1000 NORTON BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 223.4666 I a ,' • 3 1 • 1 bought the property when it was zoned more restrictively, and 6 Ir 2 fortuitously, the City subsequently'upzoned, then downzoned it 6 cI5 3 again. Nor is it the case presented by Carlson v. Bellevue, 73 APp — 4 Wn.2d 41 (1968) where the landowner himself sought an upzone 8 9 5 because of the expansion of commercial uses around his property. 20 6 TADCO purchased this property while it was zoned 12-3 and has I 7 paid real estate taxes on it that were based on its R-3-zoned TZ, 8 value. •TADCO's valid expectation was that the property would subma is t 9 maintain its R-3 classifications and resultant value. Now the Of t he czt 10 City of Renton, by reducing permissible uses to single=family 11 residential, in effect seeks to utterly destroy the value of ' 121TADCO's land. • PADCO 13 ; The evidence will show the reason for the reduction in Oi h Preseh. 14 ,value, quite clearly. The topography of the property is such on 'Exhib 15 ;that it is economically unfeasible to put single family homes on the gzea 16iit and recover the cost of doing so in the resale price. The 17lsteep terrain adds to the building costs, while the low elevation Leo embe2., 18 and adjacency to the highway depress the marketability of the he City 19 finished product. pert,, i; 201 The net effect of the rezone will be that the property will ng the 21Inot be developed in the foreseeable future. •This may be what I bees 22 'the. City of, Renton would like; if it is, however, the City or Couhojl 23should condemn and purchase the property to serve as a perpetual o orth of 24 "greenbelt," and not accomplish its purpose at TADCO's expense. S, the 25 . D. The Examiner Must Weigh the Relative Gain to the o, the 26 !Public Against the Limitations on TADCO's Potential Use of the comp I �� : 7:'Property. 1977 • in 28 . In Carlson v. Bellevue, 72 Wn.2d 41, 435 P.2d 957 (1968) , g coon - — 29 the Supreme Court set out a series of factors to be considered 30 in passing on a proposed zoning ordinance: 31 "In determining whether or not a zoning ordinance is reasonable in its application to a given parcel of land, 32 among the factors to be taken into consideration are the MEMORANDUM - 10 I.AW OFFICES OF SHIDLER.McBROOM.GATES&BALDWIN 10011 NOIITON BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 223.4600 / / fi f J 3 4 1 character of the neighborhood, existing uses and zoning of S I nearby property, the amount by which property values are n 2 decreased, the extent to which the diminution of values 6 c promotes the public health, safety, morals or welfare, the A Y 3 relative gain to the public as compared with the hardship LZ imposed upon the individual owner, the suitability of the 6 4 subject property for the purpose, for which it is zoned, and the length of time the property has remained unimproved, 9 5. considered in the context of the land development in the area. No single factor is controlling but each must receive 6 due consideration." (Carlson, p. 51) \ 7 Given the special burden on the City imposed by the Parkridge ?'t' hs 8 case, this means that not only does the City need to demonstrate 144 is the 9 that changed circumstance call for a downzone of TADCO's property the C-1t-kC 10 in the public interest, but that the public benefit from that • 11 downzone outweighs the hardship imposed on TADCO from trying to 12 adapt its property to single-family use. lb owns 13 We are dealing here with a total of 12 acres of. property reent1y I 14 located immediately adjacent to a large freeway. North of this E'xh1b� 15 property a multi-unit condominium has recently been completed; 9r t A, 16 'another her is located just down the hill at the end of Mill Avenue 17 South. Just on the other side of the freeway is part of Renton's h ber s i 18 central business district. The property itself is very steep its„ Z 19 and the evidence will show that zoned as R-3, some sort of s cof:: 20 fairly low density cluster apartment or condominium development , i s siti 21 of perhaps as many as 90 units would be all it could support. pport. ,e "tor- 22IThe property is lower in elevation than most of the surrounding foe. I a per 23 neighborhood, and the location is not desirable for single- 2a1 )„tc• '-'7 .4 24 family residents. The evidence will show, in short, that the .4t)001 25 property is itself unsuited for single-family use, since the °'11 Y pry 26 building costs would not be likely to be recovered from the mprehensa 27 price the property would bring on resale as developed. The 7'AZ)C0 28 drastic drop in value of the property if zoned R-1 (to less than Ihtp, for 29 1/10 of the R-3 zoned value) reflects this unsuitability for 30 single-family development. 31 To be compared with this drastic hardship on TADCO is 32 whatever slight benefits will accrue to the -Renton Hills area MEMORANDUM - 11 LAW OIFICES Oh SHIDLER.NjeBROOM.GATES&BALDWIN 10(10 NOII ION BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 223-4666 �1 I OPP �:. 4 • i 00- 1 from having perhaps 90 less cars use Cedar and Mill Streets. 2 TADCO submits that the hardship to it clearly outweighs any 3 "benefits" to the public. • 4 E. Rezonin of TADCO's property is Arbitrary "S ot" Zoning 5 in That the R-1 Use Classification is Inconsistent With 6 Surrounding Uses. 1C 7 The original comprehensive plan for the Renton Hill area 11 12 8 would appear to have been the most suited for the particular 9 concerns of the area. Recognizing that the bulk of the atea 13. 14 10 would be utilized for single-family dwellings, the City Council 11 provided for an R-3 "buffer zone" between the residential areas 15 ' 16 12 and I-405 with the adjacent Renton business district. • In part, 17y 13 this would be based on the undesirability of land adjacent to a 18 14 freeway as single-family residential property, as well as the 19 15 characteristics of the property itself rendering such development 20 i 16 costlier than normal. 21 17 Strangely enough,g , as soon as TADCO ,started planning the fi 18 sale of the property to a developer, for the first time, Renton 22 !' r• 6' 19 Hill's populace became concerned with possible traffic problems, 23 , 241, 20 the net result being that TADCO's property was sing led out as 25 21 the subject of first, a change in the Comprehensive Plan and 26 22 second, a rezone. (While the validity of the Comprehensive Plan 27 23 amendment is not being examined here, it cannot be logically At 28 do 24 separated from the rezone application itself. In short it is 29 th 25 apparent that the "amendment" was made specifically• in order to 30 26 obtain this rezone.) 31 guy 17 "Spot" zoning has not been extensively considered in ;2 28 Washington other than in the context of rezoning of small 29parcels benefittiric� the subject property, e.g. , Pierce v. King MEN 30 Counter, 62 Wn.2d 324, 382 P.2d 628 (1963) . However, where, as 31 here, only a small number of adjacent or nearby property owners 32 are benefitted, spot zoning may also be found. See 1 Anderson MEMORANDUM - 12 nw 01I u:Ls or SHIDLER•MEBROOM.GATES&BALDWIN 1111111 NI)"ION 0111L DING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98104 ?L:1-4666 , / . 1 American Law of Zoning, (2nd Ed. ) §5 5.08-5.18 (1968) . The 2 "benefit" involved need not be simply profit (Sonneland V. City 3 of Spokane, 4 Wash. App. 865, 484 P.2d 421 (1971) ) . Here, only ' 4 the residents of Cedar Avenue South receive any "benefits" in 5 the form of their perceived protection from additional traffic 6 congestion. Significantly, the Mill Avenue South area, which is 1 • 7 still zoned R-3 would stiffer from increased traffic congestion 1• 8 as much if not more (given the nature of, that street) were that 1" 9 area developed for multi-family housing. The only distinction 13 10 between Mill Avenue and Cedar Avenue is that TADCO planned to • 14 11 sell' to a developer, and similar plans were not in the works for 15 12 the Mill Avenue property. Such a .criterion is clearly discrimi- 16 13 natory and arbitrary, and is an insidious form of "spot" zoning. 17 i 14 F. Other Arguments. • 18 15 TADCO recognizes that its other arguments concerning the 19 1 16Iappearance of fairness and compliance with SEPA are directed 20 c i 171more toward the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan amendment 21 ;> 18 than to this application for a rezone. Obviously any rezoning .22 �` a 19 pursuant to an invalid Comprehensive Plan amendment is itself ,23 T 20 invalid; however this hearing will not of itself affect the 24 , t- 21 amendment's validity. 25 farm 22 26; adopCE 231 CONCLUSION ' //Avenue 241 The evidence will reveal no significant change of circum- �8 1// hT"nzpr' 25istances in the Renton Hills neighborhood 'supporting a downzoning g e ame 26 of TADCO's property. In fact, downzoning to single-family use i On ` 7! in effect renders development of the property at all economically Super.. �' for 20unfeasible in the foreseeable future, destroying its value for 29. all practical purposes. Downzoning thus constitutes an ME(yOIVbG 30 unconstitutional taking of property without due process of law. 31 Furthermore, the burden imposed on TADCO outweighs any minimal 32 gain to the general public from the downzone. Finally; the R-1 MEMORANDUM - 13 LAw on ICES OF SHIDLER,McBROOM,GATES&BALDWIN 111110 NO"TON DOILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 9B4O0 T2:1.1666 . . .„. . • .. .. . ,4. .. • :,.,., . --. -..,,, ., , , , . . .. „ ..., _ git1444444te CUY Oi: RENT - ilt:,' -VOVAP LICA 1,-,1,: neilhAIN . . . . ,.,/ 4) /// . ,. , . 1 classification is inconsistent with surrounding uses, to the 2 benefit of only a small number of nearby property owners. For 3 .these reasons the proposed downzone should be rejected. , , 4 . DATED this ••:/7 day of June, 1978. • 51, SHIDLER, MCBROOM, GATES & BALDWIN By l. 0.44.1....1 cil ,- XL.------•7 i . 4es R. Irwin 1 .8'. By /gla,(A,te, ,12-v.PL4r1J1-, 9: , David H. Binney 10: D7/1 _ . : DHB:dz ' . • 11 6/8/78 ' ' . • . . . . . . . . .. _ . . . ' 1:;.i • . .. . . . . . . . . , • . .I.:',,,' , • i 1,1r . ' • . 1. 11 t .,. . . . . , • . . • . ' . ., . ,. ., . . . ' • :i,1. . . ... MEMORANDUM - 14 . •.,I,I m BROOM.GATES 4 BALDWIN,101.11.,11,MPMk. . !•I AI II I,WASNINGT(1N 811104 . . • • • . . ti .K. ,. I: a R i. 1rt !L . • ,•,--•[ . I .T _ 1 1 13 .- ill i - i.--'c 51r4r:- iii rti . .- gr g- -- ' • --RITTr.- ,,,t Fr, . • R- II, .--, Lamm . r s.,,,,, ) d§. I ,,t , i. �SUBJECT•SI_TE J!/�sniii -- ..��,` t R- is --- • By ��,, ^n GS-I . I. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT t, COMMENTS IN WRITING. ' IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT: _ ` S CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550.. MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. RENTON, WA. 98055 • EXHIBIT B i.. • Ei 2 3 '4 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTONFOR KING COUNTY 5 6 TRANSAMERICA DEVELOPMENT ) COMPANY, a California ) • 7 corporation, • ) • ) 8 Plaintiff, ) NO. 838 799 9. -vs- ) 10 THE CITY OF RENTON, ) STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS 11 Defendant. ) 12 ) • 13'i .IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their undersigned attorneys, that the Order on 14 Show Cause entered in this matter by the above-entitled court on the llth day of January, 1978, may be amended. That Order 15 provided that (1) The writ of certiorari issued on December 27, • 1977, to the City of Renton be confirmed; (2) All proceedings .16 pertinent to the amendment of the comprehensive plan for Renton Hills, including zoning hearings; be stayed and 'prohibited until 17 the final determination herein; (3) All moratoria on the construction of multi family structures in Renton Hills be stayed and pro- 18 hibited until the final determination herein; and (4) Plaintiff 19 post an injunction bond in the amount of $500.00. The parties agree that the stay of proceedings should 20 be lifted so as to allow the City of Renton to conduct necessary rezoning hearings, subject to the plaintiff's right 'to request . 21 that all of the initial records for the comprehensive plan change plus any records from the land use hearing examiner's decision 22 in the zoning action, together with followup City Council action, be certified to the superior court for consolidated review. It 23 is further understood by the parties that such an order would impose an obligation'upon plaintiff not to make application for 24 a building permit or any other substantial development permit ' until the zoning hearings and subsequent City Council actions 25 thereon have been finalized. • 26 DATED, this day of February, 1978. 1 27. SHIDLER, •ucBROOM, GATES DWIN PAIN.& WARREN 28 By: l ,• �,, ' • m. 1026 r1 i • 29 Craig V.'% ntz s Lawrence J. .W rren ;d 'Attorneys for Plaintiff . Attorneys for Defendant 30 31 Stipulation & Order Modifying Stay of DWIN 32 Proceedings - 1 • • LAW OFFICES OF SNIDLER.Mc ROOMi GATES S BALDWIN 1000 NORTON BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 1111104 223.4666 ORDER 2 BASED UPON THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the stay of proceedings 3 hereinbefore entered on January 11, 1978, is modified to allow the defendant, The City of Renton,to immediately convene a zoning 4 hearing relative to the reclassification of plaintiff's property from R-3 to R-1. This modification is contingent upon fulfillmen. 5 of the following covenants or conditions by the parties: 6 1. If plaintiff's land is rezoned pursuant to the above-mentioned zoning hearing and subsequent approvals of de- 7 fendant's City Council, that decision and the entire administra- tive record associated therewith will automatically be deemed 8 part of the record of the instant appeal, and will be consolidate. therewith for purposes of trial; 9 2. If plaintiff's land is not rezoned pursuant to the 10 above-mentioned hearings and subsequent actions of defendant's City Council, defendant's moratorium on the construction of 11 multi family structures on plaintiff's property will be immedi- ately revoked by defendant's City Council; 12 3. Plaintiff will not apply to defendant for a 13 building permit or any other substantial development permit until the zoning hearings and subsequent City Council actions thereon 14 have been finalized: Provided, however, that plaintiff may make application or applications for building or substantial develop- 15 ment permits prior to the termination of the zoning hearings upon receiving written consent therefor from defendant. 16 DONE IN OPEN COURT this day of , 1978. 17 18 JUDGE 19 Presented by 20 SHID . , McBROOM, G. 21 (�, ^. . ig V. W 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff 23 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND NOTICE OF PRESENTATION WAIVED: PAIN .& WARREN 24 25 :2(!:6119AC“t/- awrence J. War en 26 Attorneys fort efendant 27' 28 29 30 Stipulation & Order 31 Modifying, Stay of Proceedings - 2 • 32 LAW OFFICES OF SHIDLER.McaROOM,GATES&BALDWIN 1000 NORTON BUILDING SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 96104 223.4666 EXHIBIT C • [Nos.44603,44604. En Banc. January 5, 1978.] PARKRIDGE, ET AL, Respondents, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ET Al., Appellants. [1] Zoning.— Rezoning — Evidence — Necessity. A rezoning action taken without the support of credible evidence is arbitrary and capricious. [2] Zoning — Rezoning Basin — Public Interest. The neces- sary relationship to the public interest will not be presumed in a ' rezoning,such an action being adjudicatory in nature. (3) Zoning—Rezoning-Basis —Community Views.The views of the community may be given substantial weight in considering a rezoning request but such views are not controlling. (4] Zoning —'Rezoning — Judicial Review — Administrative Record—Necessity.Judicial review of a rezoning action requires that the agency conducting the proceeding provide a verbatim record of the proceeding together with findings of fact and conclu- sions or reasons based thereon supporting their action. (5) Appeal and Error—Findings of Fact — Review - In Gen- eraL Findings of fact which are supported by substantial evidence tan. 1978 PARICRIDGE v.SEATTLE 455 89 Wn?d 454 will be accepted as verities on review although the reviewing court might have reached a different result had it been the trier of fact. 61 Zoning —Vesting of Rights — Building Permit.The filing of an application for. a building permit vests the applicant with the right to use the land, if the permit is thereafter granted, in accord- ance with zoning regulations in effect at the time of the application, provided that the application submitted and the permit issued con- form to zoning and building regulations in force .at the time of application. 7) Environment - SEPA —Purpose —Delay. Neither the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 nor other related statutes and ordinances may be used to delay construction projects merely on the grounds of unpopularity. Nature of Action: A developer sought review :of a • -ezoning of property with regard to which he had filed a building permit application, and sought to require the city • zo issue the building permit. Superior Court: The Superior Court for King County, Nos. 783462, 792863, William J. Wilkins, J. Pro Tem., on June 10, 1975, entered judgments in favor of the developer iirecting the prompt processing of the building permit ipplication. Supreme Court: The judgments of the trial court are i/ rmed. The court holds that the record on review was Inadequate and did not support the rezone and that the right of the developer to a permit vested at the time of ipplication. John P. Harris, Corporation Counsel, and Gordon F. Crandall, Assistant, for appellants. Montgomery, Purdue, Blankinship & Austin, by John D. Blankinship and Jerry W. Spoonemore, for respondents. Roger M. Leed on behalf of Capitol Hill Community Council, amicus curiae. 456 PARKRIDGE v.SIMILE iao.1878 Wn.2d 464 HICKS, J.—These two cases weredatAppealsdor trial in the Superior Court. On appeal, the Court con- tinued the consolidation and certified the cases to this court. follows from a The first case, called the 'rezone case', writ of certiorari issued to review the action of the Seattle City Council in rezoning from apartment construction to single-family use eight lots and two half-lots adjacent .to Volunteer Park, but separated from it by 15th Ave., E. The second case, called the 'vested rights case', follows from a writ of mandate sought to require the City to issue a build- ing pe rmit for the construction of an apartment house on, the, same lots. In the 'rezone case' the trial court voided the rezoning, and in. the 'vested rights case' the court directed the City to continue processing:the building per- • mit application promptly, diligently and. in good faith. We • affirm. the trial court. In 1957,''the City of Seattle adopted a comprehensive plan and a new zoning ordinance. Block 29, Capitol Hill Addition (No. 4), was classified as RS 5000 (single-family, • high-density, residential zone), except Lot 28; a corner lot on East. Galer Street, which was zoned BN (neighborhood business). Two years latei in 1959, the City rezoned,Lots 15-27 of Block 29, to RM 800, a classification permitting apartment construction. , In 1963, the.City engaged a planning firm to determine the best locations for high-density apartment use. In 1964, a report was submitted to the planning commission rating 12 areas in the city as suitable for high—rise apartments. Lots 15-27 were in one of those areas. After reading the planning report, Parkridge, in 1966 and 1967, purchased Lots 17-24 and the easterly portions of Lots 15-16 with the intention of constructing an apartment house thereon. Parkridge's petition to have these lots rezoned for high-rise development was denied. Thereafter, the market for apartments softened and plans for the development of the site were postponed. Jan.1978 PARKRIDGE v.L .TILE 457 89 Wn.?d 454 Some years later, the City ordered Parkridge to repair to • code, close or demolish certain of the structurestoton City this property. December 5, 1973, Parkridge applied for a permit to demolish one of the houses covered someone the City's order. Pursuant to a private arrangement, in the City's building department notified a group known as the Capitol Hill Community Council or Capitol Hill Land Use Review Board of the demolition application. December 10, 1973, the superintendent of buildings received a letter written by one who had received notifica- tion of the demolition application. The letter demanded that the City require an environmental impact ssuggested prior to issuing the demolition permit and specific information be sought fro ha �ige. ursa later the City notified Parkridge ar require comprehensive environmental assessment in the letter. total plans, including the infor an environmental Parkridge did not agree provideto was assessment at that time and no demolition permit issued. January 4, 1974, the above-mentioned letter writer and a group of Capitol Hill residents filed a petition to rezone the Parkridge lots from apartment d Its to to olbtainly s a dential use. Parkridge dropped 7, 1974, applied to the demolition permit and on February City for a building permit for the construction of a 60-unit apartment building and paid the required $1,200 fee. commission Following various hearings of the planning and the city council's committee on planning and urban development, the council acted on the rezone petition. Dis- regarding a recommendation from nlowest density), ing commission to rezone to RM 1600 (multiple-residence, the city council voted on June 24, 97t, to RS 5000 rezonein accordance with the Capitol Hill petition (sin- gle-family residential use), and passed ordinance No. 103510 to that effect. The mayor signed the ordnance on June 26, 1974, and 30 days later it became Park- ridge responded by filing a petition for certiorari to review 458 ?ARRtmG. sa'ATTLE Jan 1978 SB Wn.2d 464 the action of the city council, thus beginning the 'rezone case'. After examining Parkridge's application for a 60-unit apartment building, the. building department's environ- mental section requested a 'complete environmental • assessment'. On April 9, 1974, Parkridge employed the planning firm of Clark, Coleman and Rupeiks, Inc., to sat- isfy this request. At the time of trial, $4,484.20 had been paid to this firm by Parkridge and the final billing had not yet been made. On August 1, 1974, the building department sent Park- ridge a form letter notifying it that where no action is taken on a building permit application for 6 months, the drawings submitted with the application will be destroyed 1 month after written notice to the permit applicant. In response to that letter, Parkridge's architect, Hawley Dudley, met with Walter Green, a representative of the building department. At that meeting Mr. Dudley learned of a possible change in the method of computing the square footage of a site, which in turn determines the number of units permitted under the building code. On the advice of Mr. Green, Parkridge modified its plans by reducing its building from 60 units to 50 in order to avoid a possible conflict on the appropriate measure. On August 28, 1974, Parkridge's attorney advised the building department that corrections in plans were being made and the environmental assessment adjusted accordingly. Mr. Dudley continued to meet with building department and traffic engineer personnel. In November 1974, Mr. De-En Lang, of the planning firm employed by Parkridge, reported to the City regarding the assemblage of environmental information. Despite this fact, on December 4, 1974, the city building department advised Parkridge that under the building code the time for acting on its application had expired. On December 31, 1974, Parkridge delivered a 52-page (plus appendices) draft of an environmental impact statement to the building department. Et Jea 1978 PARKRmGE v.SEA. LE 459 89 Wn.2d 454 Responding to the submission of the environmental data, the superintendent of buildings sent Parkridge a letter on January 3, 1975, listing eight reasons for refusing to pro- ceed with the processing of the permit'application. The last reason was that the site was not properly zoned to permit apartment development.. After some correspondence between Parkridge's attorney and the building department, the building department notified Parkridge on January 27, 1975, that it was standing firm and would take no further action on the building permit application. On March.4, 1975, Parkridge sought a writ of mandate to compel the superintendent of buildings to proceed'in good faith with the processing of the application for a building permit. Thus, the 'vested:rights .case' was commenced. [1] In the "rezone case", the trial court held that ordi- nance.No. 103510 rezoning the Parkridge property was void.. because, (1) the decision to rezone the property was unsupported,by credible evidence and was, therefore, arbi- 'trary and capricious; `(2) .the rezoning of the. property • resulted in an inverse spot zone; (3):council'members who did not attend the:hearings failed to listen to tape record- • • ings of the hearings, denying due process of law and an appearance of fairness; and (4) the City failed to comply with.the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA). We agree 'that the decision to rezone was arbitrary and capricious and since that determination is diapositive .of this case, we do not consider the other issues decided by the trial' court. We do, however, comment below on the requirement of a verbatim record. Because review of the action of the city council in this instance was invoked by writ of certiorari, we look to our certiorari statutes, particularly RCW 7.16.120(4) and (5), which state: The questions involving the merits to be determined by the court upon the hearing are: pA� � tIDGE v. A'rrL. 1978 460 as Wald 454 (4) Whether there was any competent proof of all the facts necessary to be proved, in order to authorize the making of the determination. whether there was, upon all (5) If there was such proof, against the • the evidence, such 'a preponderance Of proof, triable eiiatence asreof, d be set aside ndered in an y thetcourt, asa ,against by a jury, as wool the weight of evidence. In this case, the trial court determined there was no credi- ble evidence before the city council that would support a decision to rezone the Parkridge property. [2] Without a verbatim record, it is most difficult to review the council's action in this h matter. W��b court'find judge of wide and lengthy from.the evidence that the rezone bore, as it must, a sub- stantial,relation to the public health, or safety, . Or welfare; Washington ex rel. Seattle le9 S. Ct. 50, 8Title 6 A.L.R. Co. v. Roberge, 278 U.S. 116, 73 L. Ed. 210, 654 (1928);.State ex rel. Modern Lumber & Inillwor words, MacDuff, 161 Wash. 600, 297 P. the.trial court could not find from soh�ha�ngedcsince t1959 character of the neighborhood had that the eight or nine lots in,this case should be a subjected to the exercise, of the City's police poore zone . action, adjudicatory in nature, the required relationship to the public interest is not to be presumed as it would be in an'original comprehensive zoning action by the city council, which we have held to be legislative327n(1972)e. FleMing v. (We discuss Tacoma, 81 Wn.2d 292, 502 P 2d opinion.) In State ex rel. this point further later in the Jehovah's Witnesses V. Wenatchee Congregation of Wenatchee, 50 Wn,2d 378, 383, 312 P.2d 195 (19 7),Uni*we quoted from State ex rel. Synod of Ohio of Ohio 229, 3d Lutheran Church in America v. Joseph, N.E.2d 515 (1942) as follows: ndents' .administrative w acts and policies may . 'In determining bteh upheld it should be observed. that the usual presumption of the.validity of the acts Of , Jan. 1978 PARKRIDGE v.SEATPLE 461 89 Wn2d 454 public boards and officials, does not apply to acts involv- ing the.;forfeiture of an individual's rights or the depriv- ing him of the free use of his Property. . . . Applying • this exception to a case like the one at bar, where public officials seek under a zoning ordinance to deny a land- owner a particular use of his property, the highest court of Maryland has held that the board of zoning appeals has. the burden of showing reasons sufficient to support • its 'authority in refusing a building permit. (Citations omitted.) Proof must be adduced in sufficient measure to support the rezone action. and. the burden Of proof is on the one seeking the change. See Fasano. u. Board of County Comm'rs, 264 Ore.' 574, 507 P.2d 23 (1973). The City contends that the evidence makes out a strong case for the rezone. The trial court found to the contrary. The evidence upon which the City relies is set forth in some 10 numbered paragraphs in its brief. We assume that this is , the evidence considered by the City to be most favorable to its.position. Virtually all of. this evidence came from two documents: the letter of recommendation from the Seattle Planning. ' Commission to the city' council's committee on planning and urban development and a memorandum from Council • - man Miller;chairman of the urban development committee, to the other members of the city council. Whether the city council considered any of, it, we have no way of knowing, absent findings of fact and conclusions. After carefully reviewing the evidence selected by the city, We find only 3 of the 10 numbered paragraphs to be pertinent and supportive of the rezone. We set them forth below 5. Since zoning to RM 800 occurred in 1959, a signifi- cant change in attitude has occurred in the surrounding neighborhood with a pride in home ownership, very much improved maintenance, and a strong community spirit being significant factors. 6. In view of the changes in the neighborhood since the rezone to RM 800 took place (1959), it is.highly unlikely 462 PARKRIDGE v.88A'['t'LE ism irs Se Wed 454 that the Planning Commission would, if presented with •such a petition today, consider approval of such a zoning. 7. The property was rezoned from RS 5000 to RM 800 in 1959, but to date no apartment development has occurred. A changed attitude in the neighborhood indicated by improved maintenance, pride in home ownership and a strong community spirit is an attribute commendable for the residents of any area. Perhaps as is suggested, a strong community• spirit opposed to the 1959 rezone might well have persuaded the planning commission against recom- I , . mending the approval of the then proposed rezone. In any j event, the original rezone of these lots in 1959 must be pre- sumed to have followed from regular and proper procedures and we are directed to no evidence in the record which would suggest that the rezone was invalid at the time it was ' made. A reference to changed attitude in the neighborhood was made in the letter from the planning commission to the councils urban development committee, but it was not fur- ther developed. We do not believe the mere assertion in the letter rises to the level of substantial evidence necessary to establish that conditions had so markedly changed in the neighborhood that a rezone was required in the public interest. The remaining quoted paragraph indicates that there has • been no apartment development since 1959 when the prop- erty was rezoned to RM 800. This statement ignores Park- ridge's efforts since 1966 when it began assembling lots for the purpose of constructing an apartment building. [3] We agree that the current views of the community urging rezone to single-family use may be given substantial weight in matters of this nature. They cannot, however, be controlling absent compelling reasons requiring a rezone for the public health, safety, morals or general welfare. See , Diner Elecs., Inc. v. Gerhardt, 398 Ill. 265, 76 N.E.2d 27 (1947). I :Jan. 1978 PARKRIDGE v.Sh..ITLE 463 • ' 89 Wn2d 454 , In considering the evidence, we note that (1) there is no i { presumption of validity favoring the action of rezoning; (2) the proponents of the rezone have the burden of proof • in demonstrating that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning, or as in this case, the 1959 amendment thereto; and (3) the rezone must bear a . substantial relationship. to the public health, safety, morals ;or welfare. We, as did the trial court, find the evidence'in ,this matter insufficient to support the. rezone. Since the City did. not carry, the burden of demonstrating such a ,change in this neighborhood as would justify a rezone for ( y :the public health, safety, morals or general welfare,'We Affirm the holding below that the rezone was void. We also emphasize another justification mentioned by !the:trial court in its oral opinion. The court said, 'Mlle city is required to present a verbatim record of adjudicatory zoning procedures in order to permit the parties to have a • full and complete review. This was not.done and it should have been done in line With the Kitsap County case.' Barrie u. Kitsap County, 84 Wn.2d 579, 527 P.2d 1377 (1974). We agree. The writ of certiorari requites the same. . I ' The writ of review must command the party to whom it is directed to certify fully to the court issuing the writ' at:a specified time and place, a transcript of the record f. and proceedings (describing or referring to them with convenient certainty), that the same may be reviewed by . the court . . . ! RCW 7.16.070. See Beach u. Board, of Adjustment, 73 • Wn.2d. 343, 438 P.2d 617 (1968). Fleming u. Tacoma, supra, distinguishes between the legislative function of enacting the' initial 'comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance and the basically adjudicatory function of subsequent rezonings. We said at page 299: The process by which they are made, subsequent to the adoption of•a comprehensive plan and a zoning code, is basically adjudicatory. • ' Generally, when a Municipal legislative.body enacts a ' comprehensive plan and zoning code it ads in a policy s ! • making capacity. But in amending a zoning Code, or i f { t , C , • . • ! r i 1 464 PARKRIDGE v.. ' .TILE 1.978 eawn.2d454 reclassifying land thereunder, the same body, in effect, makes an adjudication between the rights sought by the proponents and those claimed by the opponents of the zoning change. The parties whose interests are affected are readily identifiable. Although important questions of public policy may permeate a zoning amendment, the decision has a far greater impact on one group of citizens than on the public generally. In Barrie we expanded upon Fleming. After observing that a complete record is always important, we noted that 'the necessity of an adequate record is especially acute when the court is called upon to review adjudicatory pro- ceedings.' Barrie v. Kitsap County, supra at 586. We went on to hold at page 587 that in order to assure parties to rezone proceedings a full and complete judicial review, a verbatim record of such proceedings is required.. [4] We reiterate the requirement of a verbatim record of rezone proceedings as mandated in Barrie. Henceforth, we also require, founded upon and supported by .the record, that findings of fact be made and conclusions or reasons based thereon be given for the action taken by the deciding entity (in this case, the city council). Turning now to the 'vested rights case', the City con- tends that no vested right has been preserved because, (1) the application was inadequate to establish such a right; or (2) the application was not pursued with due dili- gence and any vested right obtained by filing the applica- tion had been lost. The trial court concluded otherwise. [5] Contra to the 'rezone case' which was considered by the trial court primarily on the return and amended return to the writ of certiorari, the 'vested rights case' was tried with live witnesses before the court as a conventional trial. Here, the trial court heard and saw the witnesses. The rule is that if there is substantial evidence to support the trial court's findings, we will not substitute our judgment for the court's even though, had we been the trier .of fact in the first instance, our judgment might have been different. Zillah Feed Yards, Inc. v. Carlisle, 72 Wn.2d 240, 246, 432 P.2d 650 (1967). Jan. 1978 PARKRIDGE v.9k.AT1'LE 465 89 Wn.2d 454 [6] This state's rule regarding the vesting of rights in cases of this kind was stated in Hull v. Hunt, 53 Wn.2d 125, 130, 331 P.2d 856 (1958), where we said: [WJe prefer to have a date certain upon which the right vests to construct in accordance with the building permit. We prefer not to adopt a rule which forces the court to search through (to quote from State ex rel. Ogden u. Bellevue, [45 Wn.2d 492, 275 P.2d 899 (1954)]) 'the moves and countermoves of . . : parties . . . by way of passing ordinances and bringing actions .for injunc- tions'—to which may be added the stalling or accelera- tion of administrative action in the issuance of permits— to find that date upon which the substantial change of position is made which finally vests the right. The more practical rule to administer, we feel, is that the right vests when the party, property owner or not, applies for his building permit, if that permit is thereafter issued. This rule, of course, assumes that the permit applied for and granted be consistent with the zoning ordinances and building codes in force at the time of application for the permit. The application filed by Parkridge in February 1974, was consistent with the ordinances effective on that date. The City's argument is that Parkridge does not have a vested right because of the delays in processing its application. The trial court recognized that more than the filing of An application for a building permit was required under the building code to protect the applicant from a subsequent zoning change. The court made specific findings as to Park- ridge's diligence in its efforts and the frustration of these efforts by the City. The City contends the findings are not supported by the record and should be rejected by this court. We are satisfied that in the context of this case, sufficient evidence exists to support the trial court's findings. Sche- matic drawings indicating a 60-unit apartment building were submitted at the time of application for the. permit. Over a period of 2 or more days in August, the drawings were checked and the discussion between Mr. Green of the city building department and Mr. Dudley, Parkridge's 466 PARKRmGE•.SEATPLE Jan 1978 • MWa.2d4E4 architect, took place. These events resulted.in.changes in design, reduction from 60 unite to 50, and modification of access between the street and the parking area. These changes were incorporated in revised drawings after discus- sions were held -between Mr. Dudley and the traffic engi- neer, or members of his office. Parkridge, through its attorney, notified the City of its acceptance of the revisions and its cognizance that changes were required in drawings and assemblage of environmental data. Mr. Dudley, testified that more detailed plans of the 'apartment building 'were ready to be presented to the City in September or October. These more detailed plans were given to Mr. Rupeiks for use in completing the environ- mental assessment, but the letter canceling the permit application was received before Parkridge was able to deliver the plans to the City. Mr..Rupeiks testified that he and his associates had devoted 129 hours of time to envi- ronmental assessment in November and 76 hours in December. A geological soil study was started in September and completed sometime in the late fall. An acoustical engineer, who had not been available earlier, consulted with Parkridge in December and agreed to do a study on the project. We find the above to, be substantial evidence 'supportive of the trial court's findings that Parkridge was diligent in its efforts and that the City had frustrated those efforts. We agree with the trial court that the City should be required to process Parkridge's building permit application promptly, diligently and in good faith. [7] The State Environmental.Policy Act of 1971 and the other statutes and ordinances administered by the building department serve legitimate functions, none of which is intended for use by a governmental agency to block the construction of projects, merely because they are unpopu- lar. We make this statement in light of the history of this Matter and because the building permit application will be, before the building department for further processing. Jan. 1978 STATE v.B. 89 Wn.2d 467 467 • The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in both cam. WRIGHT, C.J.,. and ROSELLINI, HAMILTON, STAFFORD, UTTER, BRACHTENBACH, HOROWITZ, and DOLLIVER, JJ., concur. June 13 , 197a L. Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner Renton City Hall 200 :ill Avenue South Renton, "ashington 98055 • • bear P,eeler : have prepared this information for your use as a for our presentation at the public hearing this morning. This information is not meant to provide conclusions , but only to share with you the many factors we have defined and taken into consideration in deciding what our position should be . req,:est a change in -2,on . of the property in question Fr ;;-1 . also request that no additional access be provided throu1 the : enton :fill area. We will discuss this in detail during our verbal presentation. Te also request that all streets on Benton MI_ that are currently • desicmated dead end be permanently designated as "dead end- no thru street" with additional "watch for children" signs • on appropriate streets . .;e concur with the recommendations of the Planning •Jepartment and feel they have arrived at a solution we can live with. ,e are willing, to provide any other information you .ht require to help in your decision-making process. by phone number is given below for your convenience . • RECEPV.1.:1) CITY OF Fit..NTON HEARING EXAMINER JUN 1 31978 • AM PM 7incerely, 71819dfO1s1211 413141516 ecalt,ci • ,.athy )y?olker, President Renton Hill Community AsSociation 5'32 Cedar Avenue South Renton , “ashinp-,ton 98055 • 24-‘5-0(-,3( , • ITEM NO. •ter., ,, - RENTON HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION Concerns for our neighborhood 1. Traffic Volume - The numbers of vehicles using Renton Hill streets cause severe congestion at times. An increase in traffic volume would be impossible to handle. The following traffic counts are from city records. . 1972 - The pipeline road was open during the Boeing, slump. Count taken on S. 3rd east of Mill for 24 hours. ,.Results: Eastbound - 1279, Westbound - 1466. 1973 - The pipeline road. was closed. Same location for • 24 hours. " . Results: .Eastbound - 716, Westbound' -' 831 . When the pipeline road was open, traffic volume dramatically increased and. residents requested closure of the road due to the many other problems caused by the increase in traffic. 2. Parkink - On Street parking is mandatory for most residents. Those Who .have garages have realized that they Were 'not built for modern, day, cars. . 3'. Street Width - The streets are not adequate for safe passage • of two. cars going- opposite Airections unless one pulls over to the • side to allow the other to pass. ' According to city ordinances, residential streets must .be at least 50 feet wide and neighborhood collector streets at beast 60 feet. wide. Cedar Avenue (where the proposed development would be) has a 40 .foot right Of way but the actual street width is only 26* feet. Cedar Avenue. was improved with an L:I .D.• last • year and we are now paying for a new, substandard street . • because there is simply not enough room' to widen the street. 4. .Access. - Although we have only one access, past ,experience has shown that another access creates more problems for. us ' than it solves. . It makes 'our community a thoroughfare for residents in other areas .and causes extreme congestion. We prefer to live with just one access. 174 • Page 2 Renton Hill concerns 5. Safety — Pedestrian safety is adequate if there, is a single access point. Fire safety is assured by a mutual aid agreement with Fire District #40 who will come through the gate at the top of the Hill if the city is unable to respond. 6. Alleys - Alleys are inadequate to develop for major use due to width, grade and no right of way through many back yards. 7. Crime Rate - At the present time we enjoy the lowest crime rate in the city of Renton. There is rarely a serious disturbance on the Hill. From the records of the Renton Police Department, the following are .the last statistics kept on crime rate by neighborhood. 1976 Number of calls January 9 . February 10 March 14 April 12 May 6 June 11 July 18 TOTAL - 7. months 80 calls . Most of these. coinplaints were nuisance calls i.e. kids throwing rocks, cars parked over 24 hours,. etc. In comparison with other areas for the month of July, the Highlands had 36 calls and the downtown area had 944 calls. Renton Hill had 14 less. calls in 7 months than the adjacent downtown area had in one month. Since the Hill is directly adjacent to the downtown business district, it is unusual to have such a low crime rate. 8. Children's Safety - Since there is no other access, our children enjoy the safety of knowing most of the people who come on the Hill. Unfamiliar cars are easily spotted and there are few strangers. 9. School Bussing - There is no elementary school within walking distance of Renton Hill so the children catch the bus from the park at the top of the Hill. The Renton School District will not allow its buses to run on the Hill because it is Page 3 Renton Hill concerns too dangerous because of the steep grade. It is unsafe for children to wait for the bus at the bottom of the Hill due to the railroad track and the traffic. A surge in population would compound the bussing problem. 10. Property Value - The Hill has become a desirable place to live due to the character of the neighborhood, our single family status and our view property. There are few vacant houses which adds to the safety and appearance of the neighborhood. 11 . Quality of the . Neighborhood - We feel nothing will be gained Eby changing the quality of the neighborhood by the addition of multi-family housing. We have a very unique neighborhood. It is old, well established and has historical value. In fact, a picture of one home is shown in the book Renton.. From Coal 'To Jets. There are many second and third generation families on the Hill today which is unusual in our highly mobile society.. There is pride of ownership which shows up in the vast remodeling activity on, the Hill. People choose to keep an older home and restore or remodel it because they like living on Renton Hill and they are unable to duplicate the atmosphere in another. neighborhood. We are one of the oldest residential c'ommunita.es in the city and we are proud that our homes have stood the test of time. There is value' in repairing old homes rather than tearing them down to build new ones. Unlike many older neighborhoods, ours is being revitalized and is not deteriorating. 12. Quiet - We have a. quiet and peaceful neighborhood which is no small accomplishment considering our proximity to the downtown area, Interstate 405 and the railroad ,tracks. 13. Community Facilities. - Philip Arnold Park is adequate to provide for our needs and is used by many residents in the city. But the addition of apartment complexes would seriously over-crowd the park. . Page 4 ) Renton Hill concerns 14. Public Works - We have concern that our sewer and drainage systems could not withstand the strain of providing for the needs of a large increase in population. The points we have listed are only guidelines to help you understand how we feel about Renton Hill and the many concerns we have weighed to formulate our position. We hope this will be of help to you in making your decision about the future of Renton Hill. ..e ,� . a`�_' .� L PETITION We, tha undersigned residents and property- owners of Renton Hill, hereby petition the City of Renton to rezone Cedar Avenue South in its entirety for single family dwellings, excepting those multi-family units currently in existence.We petition for this change based on the followings 1 . The traffic pattern, accessibility, street width and parking are not adequate to provide for the extra congestion caused by the addition of multi-family dwellings. We have enough difficulty now without adding to the problem. . 2. Our 'property is considered "view property" and we do not wish to forfeit our views by allowing apartments to locate in our neighborhood. All of us take pride in our homes and many have gone to considerable expense (both in time and money) to improve and modernize our older homes. Our neighborhood is a quiet place to live and we intend to . • , • = _ ...•---- keep it that way. ' Respectfully submitted, The residents of Renton Hill on Cedar Avenue South. DATE • NAME ADDRESS rn , ,RAZ-1c aCP CE iAR Ljkss. 'I .4. C-44-1 7-1 7 0, /-7 11-1-1., a; - IVO 7 4j / 79 . :,; )/ ►�} •��; y�Y c%e), 1 A r fr A/%a.J 6/2/77 �� r k���5 h\ . 0-(,k,:lAS . 3s s. CQ.Act( i'ac S Cbrctcrh) 61217 11.V, kt4 tin (T�r, I �)S l I n• . 0,,,,� l C�► �ar. �� S. • 7 /hi c- ll^ , L'1 ,� A c�i21-� 53- �' e cb,„ a.re d 0 i7 !D )Lo ;1 /14 . 1 S R C'2010 ,� � AO -Ca ( 21 c '3 ( `(f., It r- ' rt jh / I'7 r/. n ,v,fri - I (�,r 1.r >, ' 1 (r • a /r, -/ . . . . . .. . , , . . . • .'.' • . • 9i . 1 . . ., . .: : .:.',.irt.-•;.,2r;---g.: • PETITION , PAGE 2 . . .,.. . , . . DATE • , NAME - ADDRESS . • l-'. '. ; . (/2/2 7 • Le?i'45 A_,i.A-€Z eLe__P, . , I) . C 0 A P- A-VE-;.• it., • . • 66 1.77 inx Li-index ;(`-1Ild I dr 5 I() r FIAP' AU P.-• 44). • . . /,'.,/,i ., ) . . • - . , el-'/77 7 -17/ '- ,- 7 --- . . A. 1%.,... • cs : • ..: '‘ . • . ) ‘,/ /7 2 A;11 X -1-vi +.• ,-„0, 6-5fee001f' A- LIA -5- 34' .. •: • . - .2 7 7 - . 0 i ez,,,e-a..4., -a-4.--.2.._ S' .. -71. •iL4( 4-&621 je.e..../.41) 6//i‘e.rala4" Q-'...,,,ai . . 7. . ryg i.•.i‘,. ).7• t- b.)..,•.,.y Pi_l iz6 -tAp& e 5. 6- 7 /,Z ;7 7I C. 9. (7.'ia,:_le„;1/4___(;1",„e___ -<.); .. , . - 9 I • f, -01.ee 9,1 )),,.., .., .e._/,--, .c. .s- C l'ri...r-,J eil--,...- • .5. . '140.--(-),--7 2 .. )•..-E.:It.>44.-,1; , C1)1,(.."(1..AJ &- - )f.'6./1 14 (tpti.04.. . 0 • „ .0 , . . . • ' A'..\. .1cV^K \..- MZ.\\ rb2i2j C-5.. .\AN.,N'\ . - . . '• . (. ! . /7 . H. -7' (0-e?`__ ZrY11 -7--/f ' I/U-1-:3-4 // eeilect?.4, 5.so • 1.*- • . . (9-,. .‘Hig. i, J 611,-,k,b - . • ?: eQA,„.., a„, . 522, • • • .,1-_,-.?.. 7., . •,..----- .z- 4---44. • . 3 3 a e....,....earc; a....4..-e.. __L- • ( .. ., . , ; .; ; ; . / - ' • . . . .; cp-2- i?;•,,,0.0.y4 ok......_J.__ - ii II YA . --5.-). -01.-H • ' , ( 1 ..,. , . ),Ii,tieff ti44.9 schr‘ ) ...) t c_e_elem , 7.,6 ,.. ._5--. . 7r.. /.1e,-( /.-• • . . 1',,-..7 / (i,,,i,7.4., . (-- . . .7 A,.., ,1-- / .. 9"1 6a(Th . C.; _. .2 - retv ' • ..- . ./.,., , ,.of t i i- • ' . . ,f, -.---.)..J^-,-- . //0-2 . -530 ti 4. ck • A r _ / • . . . . ,- /. . -Ill- '5 7 'C' - ..-•, • e. ' . , . /. . 6 -•-;•4 eJfi- z) ' .. a ...„ c . •• -- , • -; . qrfz.vt 7 . Qityni / ' -..ev i•-t,,,,A.- 2 . 1-,. 33.. efk(e."7. ii,v,. s . • 4,-d2792 ' 4.•.;.2.4-..,LJ- 'c.f. / • .,..,LA • it, ---/f .e-e--Lez.A.-.) a...) it: A 10 . PETITION PAGE :' Eg) t. DATE NAME ADDRESS ji /� (,,gee— 5 Ids 6.1U,t S. �-�77 � « i 1. .d, 1�'S F'</‘L j Z9/3/7 7 ,, n., og 3d7 '/4 4/ 4,4e, 6/3 77 ;.�l 4 /� _ ernC� 0 a cog-it i 6 ,Jo . - / ,i, ,K _c-(). ' . oe,, .s ci, q L. g q '/;. 77.. -'it„;-)7_,-;er_,477: ./ -- 9 c-_,0,t- --- C ., t,/-71/17 fia ,.,-kaZ;Azfe--7...--- 1 k ep-VR,r. __%ii-..--- 6 /7 � te‘- 't,-,LY) 3,27 1' 4 y '? ' 1,irirL /11, . _ A .2 7 r F o,qct v S _ h/.6/m 74/c4.44_ /1.(4-7e44, &3/ - Q.r.. (14e ava4.. , „ oA/7 >6!&tbi ,terz_Y_,4_' , 35/ /d _ r;� ( 317) i1./0- %A l,,_1(� _ ,1' S. 2 5 re--e4ic4 4P�,1 -= /f oft- 7 ,„r,;z4 �,.,r zre' . 3r37 /0Diee ,eve SO . 'z tse '-, `.' _ 5a r CFPi/il dve e:e--7-2—z-) ,-?. 7 ,, ?-7-'1- ,&, 4e-6--__ � -A,. ., /; / :,. I i - 1'' 9 .yam `T /j, (' ./� : (-.1 (1,...,:: /-7 J2,../.:.Z.-"e: i(:; 3 :.,1---,. 1 ,,,,, s '&4:4 , ,/ _. ../ (,, . , • .,i,,„ s . , r ;41 / { �_ ,. Z s . . . , ap . . . We the ulersigned residents and prollorty owners of 1 ( .. ' . Renton Hill wish to express our opposition to the building of any additional multiple dwellings at the upper end of , • Cedar Avenue South. We also oppose the zoning, planning r building of, multiple dwellings or industrial concerns in any other area of Renton Hill, or any adjacent area that Might require access or right of way through our community. ' Our basic reasoning for the above opposition is that We are concerned about Increased traffic, Congestion, Park- ing problems, noise Pollutioni 'criMe against personal propertY, and any other difficulties that arise from sudden large pop- ulation increase8 within a given community. • We wish to make this opposition known to any and all . • . . interested parties. • . . . . . . . . . . . ..••••••••••...erwra•••••••••• •.s.. Na • . mmUmimmmL ' , • ' ' ' Nam'e. ' ' '. . ' Addressi • iV..• • . . ' .. ,•• - . ' , :.! ,A2, C." 7.. . .,. . / / . , .Aii , . .. . ...______ - . --- . - ._.../ ..., . ; 4,94 .1. .4. A - 4I Am. ' . ' .AS A. -•4 Al---..., IF .4 1'..1 •ILMEignalfil ali i'4,7-0/ . au/ S • . 2 /7- 77 , IMIPilir74,...- ' 6 / ilz/7 7 7 Z... . . . . Le., / 4,2..,...ZA,...ar. .. cL......,... .. s. es . . . 1-,17 -77A ..',M1-1, e - •iy' -77 9r1, , t; • 1 . .,.... .. • -. t. •IR •.,A,,,, ,,,„..„... • , Iv ,,,( ,, 714 .• R„,,,L2c„. _ . 11_._ • .. _,,,Lk, - II . ." :gAdA4. L kr-10 Zki../ . r • • it) . . . ,A, ,,,zs . , ,Tift? /17 _LL.54i..e 71-4i-e:e1-74' - • .S3L5- •{111.4:i-d... ;Pk / . _ .4,14,7 r e--• id :,.. 533 ."1/A. .:.4 E7 ,.ve •* ,t4 . . .. ._ h ' ' .-7.L.. • 5 . 3•b42-.J. ‘ve.. •, - 7•• • /1--• 1 444 " ,-- :,5-7t • i g i i-L7. • I , ''.. . (_t, .. LL., .. .. ., . -3 (' L-4-e.?-,-----,14.2 z:5--cf ./ // . • :/ •2 ;ii ,, A / ' I !). • • ,., ri,.-. is\ 1-j \ \-:i. `c f Yti ...-t.-. ) ..c-- Q.'\-). ,A,L.',/-) )-.).-1-f7/ IL (-)C2 1,11es : - . . — - S' -7,1, . . ,' Af.f. -b) `,9 V 0/ i 7•2(3-Y; . ...,..-1- ----.' 1:-t. . 0-1-7 wr,t) 2 IL/ 1,77/4 1 • , .• ,. --...c--- ,-,,,:;.- •) . ___ , , ,,,.. 7 _ i ---. • • t: , ,- , ,. , ..-d (;e:? :-----' 4-4 7. -- •-:' ...:%---)--- "7.7›"--7.--,; . ..?.„.. ,. . .73 ' Th-17' '---9-7-1 . -J/ '. •.`24 . --(2---"--A-2-a7 -0"r7Y • - 4z//44 .- 2_,./2 . (7 - 7, zy f ' ,?,,te,.). ; .7.,7;77:'1, Z ..' / i /' - • •5_ -J 3-;=.-ri. .4:5./c2/ -,s: ' ,---- -/-0°`-e,----.-----4 ,e—YT.., .., r„..7,01,,i / .;_ 7_, ,7 ,, u_,,7/17v.. ‘ 4/ 4 ?Top a I) .i37 ec- . , i&-..g. . . ---4 • • /776 . . t2. 2..e.64ze.7,:k 20 _, . ) . , - . . . _g... • c2 i. ,•. . . ' 7 - :6 , vr,rep Pie . i . ._c. i,(iY (7.14.7„7_, , , ,, • • 7A,/ , ces L.,e, (. - ,Api for / • 2 . 7i 4v716 • (- • I'!1C ":"'" 4"''''ert rod ---7Mfiy ....7% . . 00 ' 1-77,1741/ ha . --7- ?1 '' - (7.'4- . / /1k2/-P" ' • Z.4 I C4' * • c -effv• (4(+1,10j. oe •, : _13/.17e/Dric;71179 iff/v7 (-ZICl/r .) ‘ •oly vv.) rpli 0 z 2 vv.'?t) 14/ 17i ri'' kooh . 1 i , i ...,,, /ry,/yr (-NA(4-7- -- ,-P -. 6 (. 7. g533 qc H • . - 3 WY N a Ill(L... ... t . .4 ' • � � --- ---'---'------ ---' - --' ---_ _' -~ Of 77r � ) (W•97 0.47P , -er4e/ -, 6I! r, I n:. . s� n is+' � .f i .1 r-tti L ' 1 -1 ir b ` r�p Q - - ---,... .-r- ..--- ..,, - - - .0 c ---- 1 ..1." "" -4, .r .,......„„ .......-......i-- 1,,,,, --4, /iv , , . .0...,,,,,,- ,. : ., , A 7 . , .0v'i •?dr r 7 C/ , ,z 7.....-...7„...„...-.,„;.,,,, -,......„„.....r,... ISA I- \ I L -50';' •4,...." YI„� _ ., ,Atimigirati, -Ir A Itraraffirmaiii '''''''' •P 70 ,-,-"ir ',•:':1.4.t:'•1"-... '' , / , . f i fir 4 1 - 7 .e.--jr, r-04 _ S' • ...:-._:,;4:,..i,•,..,-.: 0.... . 7', ' - 7.r." / • -r- '7 1 - -r 7 ' f v%='a , • - , , ,I, ) lr,'+ T'/ 1 I ►• •• _r'v V�-S t •- • • . 4404, 4;'";:1'. 7 .-119212;, ,. y �-off d �' � �ter Ll -1��r:x..,• -.. Ait.l_ic::,;„ • - o ce ,7?-1,304-ff ,04 4w227/ y-g..)---... ;� 1 � :. tip ,,i--�// P/ r{�` i -v' ' ' o Li. -, •t_ - ,;V 4 .076-477p' Yr ."-- -77y 44 - Ae -li: ,, ji.s,v, -.,;: ! -7-7. . t7e, X __ /444,- ---- -,..„-ir.- ,,..,,,w214.4 ... 44 fi e` in. -, .t.ii.?, ....:(f S - wvp if i --C t- LI, -he,s ':‘:: • !, „„,,, ,.: , 4,,..,,..._ • --77-4-t7 -4 A 46 0 4 4 ` `.o I. wily , 9Og C4- Az -$, .c7241:61 z 416 ell. ;..:7 cor j...:,..,;•',:rP27_._oePr.°WT;634 -. F'-/f-Z4 tilaMi, '. •:. . X21. fe,Z.ii.---- tgE/ 77-,,,x ,-E,a. ,i -176 .Y zrk Ur /4 v.-:;. . , seas ()rpm —' • liable Address - (&L4 , .`, ...w•��;k. �6 / A' 41111- _ • . 0: 16,--e ...1- ; . .1,a.., „ ,. LttctivCt...Lk_ �O�J I I, , •• �a 7: .....--,—.....—,--- ..k.") ,. ,..Q.VL. D._ ..40.41k i q° 0 -eAci,,*- ge, .., .:•:,-f..vi-:- a io . - ,ii��x AUK' . . - . -',, t. �0 I, pa " l`� ' a / /d 0 9_ rn T /90 Qg'' 1 -Iv f 7,. • ,I •• •a a / •• a . G a ���d v'd+ µ� ���' / ". ?�t. . tI / c — / 4 /diet) , -,. (e3A•e_s4 :::.-;.,:.;• .-....t1.1.-,.204, — ) R -- , e51. ;2,14 _:i9P.aa4I'VP tg felck, - ..?„,te _a(40.1,1--::.. -:.1.-,73ii-V?, Al. _,___... :,4140.74 • a-16,-7? , 74.4, g.' Amimmmin..1•••••••••••• S • ~Rid.. aa-&o Attu : ,.:,..--i..........„. 9/e9 ry/ 0/11* . :.-.z...r.t:frv::,,e; : p4,,,),--(,irdiA,L il1 jj) ?a 0 rit.4.,J.elzi../ 41A...1 . 41 . . :le-) t,.. 7 7 z..-c-c3 .„. ,„ ' ° /1›,- .. ( C.--------- 4...........------- •• ' !,:•,••.,?,i.,1-4•.:.: fr - /ems • e • 7 0 A Y.9_ //'�'' ✓' 'z• C .,1..e,•. `2 ring; L2 70 F, - ? 1 i, /,u 7)7- ...$4 , 7/ .. - ,e _ ;`• . 5771-2....w-- —27 � moo � � ��{� . ,� 8° 4/1/ate �v4 ::• '"; 4 f y - 77 ,_..,/ ,�� ' �J✓ 8// r;-'r Nov /44e Z1.:+� 67%.0-284.-. /Z7e,ar&_..e , w Lr/ 7/ -L .` 2c ( 'f.a.te Name S. Address ' :ii - I - 1 I it n ■llEii EIM.1 • . - - f..... . IN .�/ _ < �' 0. i R . / '�-. '• /9---. - MintiMENNIONIVW-1-'-'- ', . d II . • , lk . 40 % 4% , $ % 1/. . , ,. .tiiii....L.11,a, c..$%.‘,41... . .. . it. JIMMIIIIMMILIIIMPr- go _ olgariMiri - i , , _. , . _ - / -- ___.,,, .. • , ,.... A,,o, e, o . 4 .--- --) ... . . '.' Wiril:'41 .'sdfellgrAMIIIIIIhrO • - I - r _ _ ..�_ 46�?'7. .y z . • . . g - / 7 77 . , • %, '•,, ct3 ; -' 4 6 z7 L 'ii/,:. , ,. /c • I - ," _A I _ i , /.14-#.1"..-- �G.'-r,e.e�I - .. ' , 417-' .. - .7 7.. . feL.., ., .e,4_,L. . ...41,:tt_d_e, . . 5-3,s- - ' , Q,e,...e, Se 2 .- •-)- .' • I 2 IIM i ill!YAM I ginre ' Q*),.)42._. 45, •'7- .7 ROM- P i.✓ '1` ' 5, 44- 7✓I 2 ' 04 S D, filOPAISEPW7 • q 2d 6 ' . • • Mr , .k CL,14: • 41 ' ' ° . . . Wall - 3 0 t .f / G J "2 7l 3/ S R - / Q- -.e / ./ 7 7 ►L4 : - .�d.,_,� _ - 3 / - ,' • . .•, . J .41MONIM .1,0-v. -gt.;:e.:,, d. . -Z I - 7 "'�' , /�i e.n tor .0 •• - ....._ • -a.-- _ 7 - - 4. I S� /' . i . .... 3)-G : `' 'x Z i' — 1 . -7 7 . Wilirallorialli ;7 `/ A eA 'ram GC-cK.., S 6 Dete or, ame Address 7 - / - 7 7 77.AL_VI. D S •�.t yc�... l� D 7 I� ✓t,4--, , R-1 8- 77 "7,(74.Arter-qi Gil ( 3,17,:_i 6043 (, -.R,t4A.,7 dve, S, _le e nia,1/4:. ,g 7 - 177a7ui) C ipaq L,5 rmid-- . . Q12 I, ?7 a 1333 4660t) Zd 'A9.1 R 7 )IK,..1 5a5 GAS ti L _ e ; - 7 -*/ P- 7 7 )2-1_,,k_.4.„ .,.-5/_. /5--e-t---t ,4.--g--/ i v,..1 ..5 .,:z 4.7-.t..) 442.4., 5,1 S "/C 77 aidda ez_ _ii) Sao . c. c6' ( 6 r 1 am. A,t u.1 6- 7-J 5", .._ . �1(, 7 4f,L _s. ,,c,,,,..::, 1,4- .(5- • ,s- c:,7 e9, .S -/9 - 77 . ' - - /Si7- S a4't "i er--/5--77 eei31,--, _ / - -_ , , , --._"..) >6.--zszi7322,66,..ez...) tv4.,,,...ag '. 1. , 9/S- 77 /' ,/ 9A 4✓F . '' S-/�77 i � i' - • 1�/rP . 7 '4 - gi. a--- 77 e-1 Bel ) t_ g—ig'-' y i 46 /M St- 7 4- $ -) - 7 -7 5. '. ` Q'LZ< 1 e6,3 DI C a-/i" 77 ti% 1Y7 . 04 :0 `, .5 32 6f',4.ti7-- .'vim' 8- / B - 7 7 . _.rJ /1• c � J -3,2 G.R•7.� - A s/ . Sc.. 7r- 2 - ems. / 0 ,3--e. V ` . 63- I e- 77 c_ie4 At 14is- W' s ` 1 -? 7 .t-.� ?,+.) sA 1 co I J Sal C<- 1 e - rig . aaace i57,<-, ry W iii 72 fr /5-i de-, cz c / ....- k -/ -127 • i Lilf:ertilL) /<71 uh•/ 1:6. / ;12.,Ii .:( . mod - Iq;- 77 11)/(r-3-er kt-:--e) Af q) 13 pi � sa ,? .24- 1:(1 to _4.14fume ,AkAddress w Y --- ---) --' -7 i) &-- / ' .-tiO-JeA ) • a�- 77l'Icketk, �.L lz .yDL Nil -e.s. 41thi:24)' . g - c, 4- 77 . (... . , P /I 4 4d Al/Ave .5 DI) -7 T -� � • poei ..S _ 3 c-- -klz A J - _ /- Z -77 y e /ze 3' Se 3RD rr. Aufn3.0_ (9- .:1-a- 77 e' c) 0. ,16! & c.c.bc J /,1d_,C) c&uc. l •,� ,• J �ZG�a�. �o,fir+•-x I / 9- z./ . . . yu,(.. .• "_-/y., z. ?) 9 ,5',, R ,. Z7 V,.,<ia se// 2/1/ 77 0 Cill.:21.e.4_10-1 ._ ,,. . i 2,3 4/ 5:Z44 s t adripil . ,5777 h 7 - --r2. -,,,,,, ---- i,,2g_5. a.6,, .-d-li-1-4e/sitYrirr-z g_A 57 17 : i ) Daten,1ALO i2v,5" Jo - 4rd ..' -. &/17ien K/.1 1-1 77 Se . 3(x.-6-4, /' a ? 41 . i.M 4::".1,---/--. 5• - 7? L 7` /, a '56 3 uJ 3zZ- let- -V ,2 5-- 77 is , . .3 0 , �.0 /#=- /41/a 5,' R0 ,-. K 2 S-7" (Li-,.,— cLL ,1).2 3 _ s . rj 20_,- . . . s. .�� etA.,I 4 -) ' a i G7 - 7 to/! �c .1i !....-e42c41rr,t Q � l - t� /t GCii. k_ ' AVC:-. , c) &-;-i-T;;T:! ? `j'' 7 !/ ;��-P ` 4.:.•( S �a,. S:1-k.' y.:4;.i-1_, 4 ' 76'/ /, .I lr< �f'D 2 . . _,-, . ...., T (-),(i..,„, ..iio a-, ii)20 fiElyi-cw hue- o i- EN-f,o4::' - . ; ; .., ..) ; _ ..7....14) . N-c-t--y-,_k_ r, ef 0 S ge-,,,, , ezv-c. G o_ „ .__, ` 1, 'S :_\1' c\ �1 _ �; ,l ••• .• / _. -_... ..._. 'Y, '-.1 /t /, q_ iZ•" • , , . • •T.-, , * 2-2 2- 78 24 He. • ,.. . .....".. W. 841444 • 7.38 , ..,.... . - • -:„ 7---7 ; I • I E. Soviv0 TS?. Qi› • •42 • . • .,- ,,,-----, . ; ..c,.. • ..' - 7' >-. ., II . • I .. ,. i„... ,,, I . ; • --' ..,-' .--:- ,„.r. ...., ,,...- .., it. • .....ici 1. .....„„„/ 4.- /..-- .-• . 74 4 Illii 11, S "2 r‘i 1 i ••--- ' L_ST. .,--- . ---, - - 1 7 / 2 V11,80v/40 .1.4.L. , z . • ----- - 7 ic - — r-c„...„---%----.2------ ,-: • ' 1! , , , -•-:• - toi-: ,... ,-. zi - 22 78 • ' • ,.• , / -, i i 1 i 1 . +31'12 -12-78 . ; ____ ,, ,. . ..., ., ., ! I . qi .1 \ , 1 . 24 NI.wet4t. " • / • / - i Li \, / / li , i ,/.//: if; ,,, \\ V. . , , 1318 Z:1 ' I ...----. . .. :1 i / / 1 . . ; '. ' , •,i ; ,z,-, 44n kni• !i — , i ' li , \ .;, : 1 ! . __. 1 , _.:::\ ' \ 11 W I 1 : I I i ' • 1 . I : \ ' I . IV) \ . RECEIVED 41, . -... , , i I -i ') I CITY OF RENTON . i ; 1 •I :kk) I; ), > I HEARING EXAMIN CR 2 • ' - : ' JUN 1 31978 I . AM PM . ; - - . i i • 0 .! 4 718194011120 '213.415,6 [" j 1 '14 .- i ; ! t- ; I ' < k'ij • : , :1 • * - TRAF,IC- Coyly Ts As or 2- 2z- 76 *4- T/CAFFI C CovA,TT AFTEIC PIPeLINE. ROAD CLoStigE. Y-25.-73 EXHIBIT l'i..!O.__,—____-4- :L—!--;•"-. / 1\T 1--\ i<. ' ' -71ir , -...=••••IIPO . • I 'POLLING NglS AVE' S RECEIVED �;xI-I I3I`I' 1.1 �. 7 i r e TY ..OF RENTON \\ REAMING EXAMINER I ITEM N .. - - C �� ] 31978 I r AM PM ,g1911011111211,213t - , -+ ROLLING NILLSI 111 \ \ • 1 i L • C.,.......- , • ROLLING. c.,,,,,, "In+FS AVE S 1 fe;r4., • - J 1 I. 24 �`` 1 \ \ — 4.......\„............... NIGH`AVE S - ]HAC 1 ' ` N 1 = 1 lel II _ - - - -,. .c PUNT AVE — z SRANT AVE 3 w r••••'''''''''''''..i ` 1 II 1 8Y .. A A \ 1,4 D:7 w \ ``I 31 / 1 1 ,« j ��� 262 °'' Jót\ i0/ 717 ;r ..�M .0- _____./ g.-' 0,c' r. 22 at • _ 101 re J' - 400 006 / AO' . jpeog /:+ • • CpGx \'o _ 4)►,. TNt1Y0E11 49 !14. . /. - / , MILL S.75 V r� ^'✓ �j I 2SW . A E3-I5 AC I i 5?„c SZ-� , �0 j y 27 r •• IIfTERSTATE 405 .p ~�' -- r • ('TMUNDERMILL Pl.�i" Z _ �� �� r, \�----- a RENTON ELKS �J b ��` . • . N / 4 v- 1 I p 111 ,..1I SITE i 1 pQ'0 0• as 32 1.40AC GEt • II MEMORANDUM DATE: April 21, 1976 TO: Del Bennett FROM: Bob HamMond SUBJECT: Cedar Avenue South -- Parking Survey The results of the parking survey are as follows: 21 Residents desire parking on both sides 21 Residents desire parking restricted on the east side 4 Residents failed to mail back their questionnaire 1 Vacant resident Exactly 50% (or 23) of the residents were contacted personally. A list is attached shOwing address, how contacted, and name and parking preference. My recommendation would be to allow parking on both sides in view of the original intent of the improvement; however, this should be a Council decision. r!X RAH:ad RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON AttaChMent NEARING EXAMINER !UN 1 3 1978 AM • PM • 718191101111121112131415,6 ) EXHIBIT NO ITEM NO: / 7F ie . TRAFFIC STUDY ?'. By {y JOSEPH J. MILLEGAN & ASSOCIATES, INC . THE PROJECT SITE • The proposed Cedar Crest Condominium site is located east of I-405 in Renton, Washington. As shown on the Vicinity Map on page 7, the pro- ject site is bounded by I-405 on the west, Cedar Avenue South on t_. east, South 7th Street on the north and a 300-foot Power Line ease.-ent buffer on the s,outh . The property farther south is zoned R-4 , Multi- family residential. . Photographs 1 through 3 illustrate the existing site condition, see ' page .9 . it. is . a Steep -hillside- with over 60-foot drop to proposed con • dominiums from the adjacent road, Cedar Avenue South. At the northern end of the 'project site, two 4-plex condominiums' a:_ built . ' See Photographs 4 and 5. The existing poorly maintained housing to. she • north of this property is shown in Photograph 6 . Mill Avenue South which runs parallel to and West of Cedar Avenue South is shown in Photog:eph 7 . The existing development on Mill Avenue is illustrated in Photogra; 3 . • The. Photograph 9 shows. a panoramic view of the hillside. The Mill ..venue . apartments and the 4-plex condominium on Cedar Avenue can be identified ' in this picture . • . .THE ACCESS . • . Cedar Avenue South which runs North-South is a 27-foot wide street with a gentle 4% 'slope down the north. It has six and a half feet wide side- . walks on both sides .. See Photographs 10 and 11. The project site is located to the West of Cedar- Avenue . and South ' of its intersection with, . South 7th Street. Cedar Avenue South ends at South 9th Street, see Photograph 12 . THE TRAFFIC Two-way traffic and parking on both sides of Cedar, Avenue South are per- mitted. ' The roadway with its relatively new. and good surface cond:=:�n will carry approximately 1000. to 1200 average weekday traffic vole-= . The peak-hour traffic volume is approximately 10% of the average daily traffic (ADT) volume . The morning peak hour will occur from about 7 :00 a .- . to 8: 00 a.m. and the evening peak hour will occur from about 4 : 30 p .m. to 5: 30 p.m. . On November ,-l-r, 1977 , the staff of Joseph J .' Millegan & Associates , Inc . , observed and recorded the traffic count north of Cedar Avenue intersection at South 5th Street. The measured evening peak-hour volume between 4 : 30 p.m. to 5 : 30 p.m. was 49 . On Noverrber x2;61977 , the morning peak-h:ur traffic volume was measured between 7: 30 a.m. to 8 :30 a.m. It was 27 . . vehicles. . RECEIVED . CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXARINER EXHIBIT. NO. JUN • 1 31978 PM . ITEM NO — ' 7 7,8,9�l(1ind2..112,3,4,5,6 -1- . i These findings are confirmed by the Traffic Department for the City of Renton which took a traffic count on June 23, 1977 at the same location, see page 15 . The peak-hour volume was 25 between 7: 30 a.m. to 8: 30 a.m. and 46 between 4 : 30 p.m. to 5 : 30 p.m. The 24-hour volume was 572 .' The City has also taken a count on June 21, 1977 North of South 4th Street intersection at Cedar Avenue South. The peak-hour volume was 28 between 7:00 a.m. to 8 :00 a .m. and 66 between 4 : 30 p.m. to 5: 30 p.m. The 24- hour traffic volume was 691 . See page 16 . The Measured ADT is approximately 50% of the estimated average weekday traffic capacity for Cedar Avenue South. The measured morning peak-hour traffic volume is very low and afternoon volume is about 50% of estimated capacity. It is estimated that the proposed project when fully occupied will gen- erate not more than 450 trips . This estimate is based upon recommendation of Trip Generation Institute of Transportation Engineers. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is a 90 unit 4-plex clustered condominium con- struction. The estimated vehicular trips per average weekday for a 90-unit complex on the subject site is 450 . With present ADT of about 600 , the additional trips generated when the condominiums are built and occupied will not exceed the present design capacity of the roadway. The estimated peak- hour traffic will reach about 100 . CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The present traffic condition of Cedar Avenue South appears to be about 50% of its optimum design capacity. The additional traffic volume generate by the proposed condominium complex will utilize this excess capacity. However, the following recommendations are made which, if opted, will im- prove the existing traffic circulation on Cedar Avenue South . Plan 1 : Restrict parking on east side of the roadway during peak hours of traffic. See page 17 , for results of City conducted poll which shows that 50% of people responding to poll elected to restrict parking on east side of Cedar Street. Plan 2 : No parking on both sides of Cedar Avenue South between S . 3rd Street and S. 4th Street and no parking on east side south of S. 4th Street. Plan 3: Traffic circulation to make Cedar Avenue South one-wav southbound and Renton Avenue South one-way northbound between S. 7th Street and S. 3rd Street, -see page 18 . Plan 4 : No left turn at S . 7th Street intersection with Cedar Avenue South for the eastbound traffic from Cedar Crest Condominium complex, see page 19 . Plan 5 : Remove sidewalk along east side of Cedar Avenue South, thus widenin, the road width to 33 '-6" between S. 7th Street and S . 3rd Street . REFERENCES 1 . Highway Capacity Manual 1965 Highway Research Board, Special Report 87 National Academy of Sciences National Research Council 2. Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation - An Informational Report, Arlington, Virginia 3. Renton Civic Center Area Traffic Circulation Study, Renton, Washington by Transportation Planning and Engineering, Inc. , March, 1970. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The traffic count included in Appendix I and the Drawings 1 through 4 are provided by the Traffic Engineering Department, City of Renton. The Renton Civic Center Area Traffic Circulation Study is provided by Victor H. Bishop, P.E. , President of Transportation Planning and Engineering, Inc. We ,express our gratitude to the Engineering Staff for the City of Renton and Mr. Victor Bishop for their help and cooperation. Joseph J. Millegan, P.E. University of Montana' - Major:. Chemistry 1940-1942 University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1942-1945 University of Washington - Graduate School , Structures 1965-1966 Professional Organizations American Society of Civil Engineers Consulting Engineers Council '. Registered Professional Engineer: Civil 1952 Washington Structural 1957 Washington Civil 1963 Alaska Civil '1963 Oregon Professional 1971 Montana Experience: CAA Sea-Tac Airport, Surveying 1943 The Boeing Airplane Co. , Tooling Inspector 1944 Douglas Aircraft Co. , Structural Test Engineer 1945-1949 The Boeing Airplane Co. , Structural Test Engineer 1946 General Petroleum Co. ,. Civil Engineer Bulk Tank Farms, Service Facilities, Warehouses 1945-1949 Harry R. Powell , Structural Engineer Building and Bridge Structural Design .1949-1950 George W. Stoddard, Architect, Structural Engr. 1950 Seattle City Light, Civil Engineer 1950-1951 Bouillon, Griffith & Christofferson Consulting Engrs. , Civil and Utilities Engineer 1951-1960 Private Practice as Consulting Engineer, Civil and Structural Engineering 1960-present Recent Related Projects: ' 1977 Partner in Charge of Engineering Survey and Report on Northern State Hospital 1977 Partner in Charge of Space Allocation and Capital Improve- ment Plan - Northern State Multi-Service Facility 1977 Partner in Charge of Missile Magazine, OICC Trident, Indian Island Annex 1974 . Partner in charge of Engineering Studies in support of Master Planning, USN Indian Island Annex 1972 - 1974 Partner in charge of investigation, evaluation, design for modifications of all utility systems, Discovery Park (Fort Lawton) Seattle, Washington 1973 Partner in charge of design for all site work and utility systems, College of the Bible, Bothell , Washington it .41, Joseph J. Millegan, P.E. University of Montana - Major: Chemistry 1940-1942 University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1942-1945 University of. Washington - Graduate School , Structures 1965-1966 Professional Organizations American Society of Civil Engineers Consulting Engineers Council Registered Professional Engineer: t Civil 1952 Washington Structural 1957 Washington Civil 1963 Alaska Civil 1963 Oregon Professional 1971 Montana ' Experience: CAA Sea-Tac Airport, Surveying 1943 The Boeing Airplane Co. , Tooling Inspector 1944 Douglas Aircraft Co, , Structural Test Engineer 1945-1949 The Boeing Airplane Co. , Structural Test Engineer 1946 General Petroleum Co. , Civil Engineer Bulk Tank. Farms., Service Facilities, Warehouses 1945-1949 Harry R. Powell , Structural Engineer Building and Bridge Structural Design 1949-1950 George W. Stoddard, Architect, Structural Engr. 1950 Seattle City Light, Civil Engineer 1950-1951 Bouillon, Griffith & Christofferson Consulting Engrs. , Civil and Utilities Engineer 1951-1960 Private Practice as Consulting Engineer, Civil and Structural Engineering 1960-present Recent Related Projects: 1977 Partner in Charge of Engineering. Survey and Report on Northern State Hospital 1977 Partner in Charge of Space Allocation and Capital Improve- ment Plan - Northern State Multi-Service Facility 1977 Partner in Charge of Missile Magazine, OICC Trident, Indian Island Annex 1974 Partner in charge of Engineering Studies in support of Master Planning, USN Indian Island Annex 1972 - 1974, Partner in charge of investigation, evaluation, design for modifications of all utility systems, Discovery Park (Fort Lawton) Seattle, Washington 1973 Partner in charge of design for all site work and utility systems, College of the Bible, Bothell , Washington Robert I . Anderson, P.E. University of Washington - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1969 Professional Organizations American Society of Civil Engineers American Congress on Surveying & Mapping Registration Civil 1972 Washington Land Surveying 1975 Washington Experience: The Boeing Company 1958-1964 Washington State Department of Highways 1964-1966 Leonard I . Schroeter, Land Surveyor 1966-1969 Horton Dennis & Associates, Civil Engineer 1969-1973 Principal , Joseph J. Millegan & Associates, Inc. 1974-present Recent Related Projects: • 1975 Project Engineer for Traffic and Parking recommendations, Master Plan' Update for Keyport Naval Complex, Department of the Navy 1976 Project Engineer for Traffic and Parking investigations, Discovery Park, Seattle Parks and Recreation 1977 Utility Analysis - Engineering Survey and Report on Northern State Hospital 1976 Partner in charge of Survey, Utility Systems, including Storm Water Retention and Sewage Equipment for Philadelphia Church 90-acre Planned Unit Development 1974 Project Engineer for Investigation and Evaluation of all facilities, Indian Island Annex - Department of the Navy Ahmed M. Jaddi , P.E. Osmania University, India - B.S. in Physics 1951-1955 Osmania University, India - B.S. in Civil Engineering 1955-1958 Columbia University - M.S. in Civil Engineering 1959-1961 Urban Planning 1963-1964 Award: Gold Medal for standing first in the Class of 1958 Professional Organizations American Concrete Institute Structural Engineers of Washington Registered Professional Engineer Civil 1970 Washington Structural 1971 Washington Experience: Central Water & Power Commission Government of India 1958-1959 Columbia University Research Assistant 1959-1961 Columbia University Lecturer 1961-1963 Ammann & Whitney, Inc. 1961-1963 Severud; Perone, Sturm, Bandel , Consulting Eng'rs. 1963-1964 Severud, Perone, Sturm, Bandel , Resident Engineer St. Louis Gateway Arch 1964-1965 Parsons-Jurden Corporation, Structural Engineer 1965-1967 The Boeing Company 1967-1969 N. G. Jacobson & Associates, Inc. , Structural Engr. 1969-1971 Wick Construction Company, Regional Manager for. Projects in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia 1971-1974 Principal , Joseph J. Millegan & Associates, Inc. 1974-present Related Experience: 1969 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility Design City of Everett, WA. 1970 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility Design City of Bremerton, WA 1971 Traffic Planning and Parking Facility General Administration State of Washington, Olympia, WA 1974 Traffic Study and Parking Design Pacific National Bank Branch Madison Avenue, Seattle, WA I - . 74) \I 14,4-ci‘ Lti rY . ± P, et• ft . i • . 1 N 4 4.7/ • PARK 0 7 r t t No, . / 5. 2ND ST. 0 art / • —14. 0 ig HALL •Z > . > 4 nc, /... ie.. . •vi . . . _ S. 3RDST.ST. . . • ) I I 1 I 1 : . • — • . / . hi: > , < < • • z S. 4TH ST. ce 0--ii ir < 0 w 1._ z w u ec _ )._ it . .. . • .. ._ I . • ui )ft [a. g 5 hi . 11 • i • . - . i SI T If St I , 1 . ego.,GCr SIT a rt.A.N 3 • � ' V • PARK :kVclr • . . A ,\ . R • / • S. 2ND ST. uS CITY . 4j HALL . 3RDST. ! . R:i.. .. 71 r , . , , • ,,, . • • 1i, 0 z • S 4TH ST.. t • O 0 z . W . UJ U cc - �� . - :_---_--- • / .. . ..el,i/°°7 No teFt RN • . . / 5.7T1� -tu ST- • /PI2OJETJ TE ri-AN1 4 . . . LJ6.1. 1 t • i waiSTGLUee.Veg. : •4kiltp M. dArDi • 4 • • ui G. r'Sr-14 ST. ••.:( RECEIVED . CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • JO 2 01970. AM • . PM 718.9110111112111234,56 rttat • Petai4=0 ik 0/ T• ti / ° • LAD E 1.4.E4Jrt 3 apit,46% tr); viv Os' lz‘ . • NI- 6" 11flU 71 (Hi s z. I 3 I / 4 • -5 titt111 6 Int 5tarn 8 til' 3 4 I JU 31 I • - S • a• • /6 10 le G ) 432 s a...4!_"a. 1 I: o J t. , ..i . 11 .., epare_kiee.v. ee. : • .eiri' 4,tio -P-- soiti il ® r VI. / . 6(14(!J • . 1: :' -. . .. . Q - :a S. ST" T. 01 . RECE IVED Q CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JUN 2 01978 AM. PM 71R1911A1111121112&3 415,6 . TlM - / PE 6a IQ0 -ru(2.k5 t LicA G 45 - 7 k oVEW.Elar 1ooApt, i15 1!% ? 74s 8 t5 830 149 Z. I • 3 . . . 4 . S i. I ill I 1 tl I1 N - a 4. —+ --a+► .1 0 I V - A t aMalIMS d • RECEIVED RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE CITY OF RENTON SUITE 206HEARING EXAMINER 16625 REDMOND WAY J UN 1 3 1978 REDMOND. WA 98052 AM PM (206) 883-8814 7,8,9,10JL12,1,2,3,4,5,6 June 12, 1978 Mr. James Irwin Shidler, McBroom, Gates.and Baldwin EXHIBIT NO. '?'c 1000 Norton Building . Seattle, Washington 98104 ITEM NO. /- /71- 7r . .. Dear Mr. Irwin: ThIs letter 'Is written to update information presented in October and November of 19.77 on the 11.25 acres of land owned by Transamerica Development Corp. and located in the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 20, Town- ship 23 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian. The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate value,differences in this particu- lar tract of land under alternative zoning designations - specifically multi- family residential as compared with single family residential - imposed by the City of Renton. The subject has the use of a transmission line easement in favor of Puget Sound Power and Light Co. . Some 2.347 acres are thus restricted. A use permit provides for certain non-structural uses for this area. A search of multi-family residential lands revealed many sales of such land. Four sales were selected since they show similarities to the subject property. Sale Buyer , 'Date Acreage Zoning Total Price Unit Price A CHG International 8-10-77 6.6 ac. RM-1800 , $170,862 $25,888 King Co. B Fairway Assoc. 9-26-77 . 20.0 ac. RM-2400 $248,000 $17,400 King Co. C Lakeview Tower Assoc. 10-28-77 2.1 ac. R-4 . $106,000 $50,476 Renton D Southridge Assoc. 8-29-77 , 2.9 ac. RM-1800 $125,000 $43,103 King Co. Sale A to CHG International is located in the 15000 block of SE 176th Street, a ,very busy street. It is of- gently rolling topography and lacking view. Zon- ing by King County is for moderate density development. 0 i Sale B to Fairway Associates is located at the 17600 block of 140th SE in King County. It is a larger parcel than subject and carries a less dense zoning designation, both inferior features compared with subject. It is on a major street, and adjoins a power substation and has a power line easement. This tract is gently rolling, compared with steep topography of subject. Sale C to Lakeview Tower Associates is in the 8800 block of So. 131st Street in Renton and zoned for R-4 multi-family development. The. neighborhood is highly developed, with major shopping nearby. . Sale D to Southridge Associates is at the northwest corner of So. 188th and Military Road in King County. Zoning is RM-1800. This. property represents multi-family development in an area of freeway activity, enjoying a good view and not incurring excessive building or site preparation costs. Subject property was purchased in November of 1965 under a R-3 zoning desig- nation for $171,492, or a unit value of $15,246 per acre. It was a component of a package of properties bought by the company. . Sales C and D demonstrate utilization of multi-family land as a buffer be- tween single family properties and more heavily developed property or the noise of the freeway. Considering the physical features of the subject, in- cluding topography, size, location and position relative to the freeway, these sales show the subject to be bracketed in value at between $18,000 and $30,000 per acre if zoned and utilized for multi-family uses. In the opinion of the appraiser, a value estimate of $25,000 per acre is prudent. An alternative zoning designation would limit the subject to single family development. This tract is not physically suited to single family residential development due to its topographic features and proximity to Interstate 405. It may be mentioned that single family neighborhoods are more successful if a transitional zone separates homes from commercial areas ,or freeways. However, research disclosed certain properties sold recently with single family zoning designations. These are located in the neighborhood. Of the known sales, the following are all considered superior to the subject for single family utilization. Sale Buyer Date Acreage Zoning Total Price Unit Value 1 Bates 1-05-78 5.0 ac. SR $ 30,000 '$6,000 King Co. 2 Parkwood 5-31-77 15.8 ac. S-R-1 $108,446 $6,800 Renton 3 Hansell Co. 11-10-77 36.0 ac. R-S-15000 $147,500 $4.,100 King Co. 4 Abrejara 7-13-77 5.0 ac. GS-1 $ 20,000 $4,000 Renton go 0 Sale 1 - this recent sale is located in the 800 block of SE 31st Court, ad- jacent to single family dwellings. It slopes down to the west and is a small tract. Sale 2 to Parkwood Homes is a single family residential property within the incorporated limits of Renton. It is superior to subject in that it is of more gentle topography and in a new single family residential area. It is desirable for single family homes. Sale 3 to Hansell Co. is located in an area of newly developing single family homes. Topography is sloping and suited to economical development. In these features it is superior to subject. Zoning requires approximately 1/3 acre per building lot. Sale 4 to Abrejara of five acres in Renton is zoned for GS-1 by that munici- pality.. It adjoins a community business district and enjoys a territorial view. Sales for single family residential development on steep lands adjacent to the freeway were not found by the appraiser's search for sales of properties with physical features similar to subject. The fact that they did not emerge demonstrates a lack of use in such properties for development - or alternatively that they do not exist in abundance by reason of the utilization of multi-family zoning to protect the single family neighborhood from the intrusions of noise and fumes. The sales cited above demonstrate single family values of from $4,000 per acre to $6,800 per acre. As mentioned, these are superior to subject for single family utility. The subject then would be valued at the lower level of $4,000 per acre as land zoned for single family uses. To restate the purpose of this letter is to detail value differences of this 11.25 acre parcel under varying zoning designations. The following recapit- ulates: 11.25 acres @ $25,000/ac. (multi-family) _ $281,250 11.25 acres @ $ 4,000/ac. (single family) = $ 45,000 DIFFERENCE $236,250 Respectfully, submitted, RANEY APPRAISAL INC. v Frank R. Raney FRR:klc e ` f SUBJECT PROPERTY • Il 1 Ill t 1 1 II1iH T. ` i • er-2 ( A 0 x ( . 11174 a • r y1 y • • 0. R ` 1 N ~ M 3 fTM 3T / . r` Pi N\ \ . , .. Sou ii.,___. r 1 i. . . . . / ) 944s A)7 .' _It + ; 11 TN S7 _� • ., +. ..... . _ .. CITY Oi S�E�,00f ,, Es. \ �` - — —f' . ......:.... ,...., ,.....,,, Ia.l ►. iiii " , • • IIIIii "� ,. �... 1 • , i` - / / . //� -N /• 1 / / `_ % 'o / / :1.8L0-5EA LE T r i • t ,/ N f^'A J/ •eVra g\ N ,. , it (II i... f g \ " 74111.1: " ' AGE' ''w1 \ ' ' . ~. Frank R. Raney, MAT, ARA. RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE 1' • • • • 3 .,•_ •,' !,..;.• ,.., i•-•:.:a ''..;(. ,1 T.'. . _. IV1. ,., I . -; . . • •..1. ..d1.' I , e .. •. 7" -',..t: I 04'.V-if l'il; .. .4 - - •4 I -.r.• se. . .., I .. •.s.''.' ..• 1,s,.,, •Iss'''- '7._! . '5A:r. ki s' __ _ '•-- ilsi_.s 55 tis!„ - av ;....•f,:,,T 0.-.--'''' .514,.° - .*•......,.;, .......HIL,; 7 ; :. 4 ,..,:... 311r..1...;ijitiiiraffsr!"1111,.:,71- \ . ., 4.....••- . S 0 41. ... .....--tg.n,-, .0 ,. p•All."......;:s ' ',., I X'.' 4,, 1 •:.-.. • ..:.,„i.,,,w-., ...•.11 ..t.1 I. -..... .,,,...... rr ‘, .• . ,..• .,-.4, ..)..,..",„,..,;•,.,.,.•., .•::.:::::::. :.. ,. . - "1 r:dr--iingf ••=1 . ...- ir,,,../1 ci., .v,.„..-,, 1 . .. ,...„...r.t..i.; :,..,..:,......i.:•iii::ii ••:clif* (// - • o 1 ml.'4,s i? ...••.:..'.4':..1.' 4.Ir.-4. ,-.1-:. :: ::: , :. m.. ti..r9grfr' ,„ -• ;•••••4.4-1.. . '..;,.,........! ..,.P.....j.;'• ,'IA,:t. l'::::::: ::::::::. 4.- _•9__,A of, i' I . "..,.,:'a.141:. g„3:1:41.41. . `,.;‘:..4!'.-,-iiEl'Ei / i,"...1 j;$01 - i.,-• .c...1 . .-- t..,...). : .1••••,,1.t!'.ii ,.1• 47....4.ili.r.1.,'.'....ri.iii'ii: .41 4.4- 5, ____;47---. .- . ..,.... ,,,,:,i. ' • .., .:, ;i;i! ' . ..... ., 119170111WAWININI. , - , . r.i...... •„di .....?„--;.. - .._,.., . A Ill *Desiii:..141wH'..'diRridgirkiteltrii ,...'.• ,..›. - "ig .40116 661 :6 ' , i ss!ss••!S - ....: t.ses VAL.1...._:, -' ,,,,,i., ,...r.• .a., ,..11.2Tenitt:01,347;fit.77,,,V. ! .....,,,.' ., ' .,_ 0 .... "‘•, r I ,_,'"..,,,,•,--.,. ,.._.... . - • ,Iiir._::,-, .,•• ••`.111`i• ....Ty e........,- . r ..... .4,-- (AN. i -f. :-. e:ii 1,..§it i•-. . NW...- ..,...„:.••'09,7:,Ii:..•4:... - OA)110-A,‘ ,".. . <c; . t: • ',':.La '.4t,... ',V. • 0 VI AI I.' cri.;1•s T 9 . ' ' i II-,.. '::*.. \*.'IA, •- . : ..1 71,1,11V 1 ' 'C'S",*.i::',/.-::N,..;: ,„. , _4111.11/{11116. .. \ r. .I. .bra2v g --1..' 44.".:.'.1:*• /-: Ulk .Zi.\.‘41 I .res' • 1 i N . !*..4 4 • N •orra.s• . - 9 tiSsarATI _ • • . ;ow/ .1 n. ,6....„ %.....,..,..,, .... 3 'i ••,.'.1„,us. ......---......... - AssmoMBIIIINSINIMMIgri_MWMgy.lot, __d ...• I • F- - , • .. % \ Iri 1 6in.:Ay 5 . • I I r• . .•:., .. ; • '... ' "r:... ....., 11 .„ . =\II '" : I? • IL, Ps, 1 ilrea., tfl-V. . I 1 i•.1 m I\.'• a ,,.i• ,,.-... - r,.17,0-1 x . • I . 1 • • .. 4"- -- . '. - • '.--.-•7..7,.;--ri•-n .: ' i ., ••••1 )4,9,.o. l'.1•1* ..-.. .. .... . .. 9 1 S , ...... • .,!s,,, -,C • . .i. al 111.r. 1 M • - .- •..' , * ,i ,. . ..,'7,a-1 .1, . z : ov„,,it.. e I 1'4 . 'n ' ; ...LI ki111112111/41- •Q !! ..-.;: -‘ r:a . %, ! • Al(ft. ' r 6 •/ . - 'It 'il,li . Plk-'..1:•.:...)4q.1 r rIll 6 .s...; 4 7. , ., , a , .. , 4 s ...: 0 LAKE i ___....,,,,, .`\kliEr ___-.4..---- timuktill ; ---7 $------..-- .a it., : •'h,...„ .-•-- '.. 4%r*1lJ Igrirrigk i Ai 60 ID • I Lin 6 „1 • , _- -- • v. II .....„0" •• Ili:."V111,2111MEMS" 2 !W.",.. lig'RE 4 ___ --- . --ii 11--...°4,, t• ~ o .- . 17711116. 1115-0111 I le 1 ,..? 4 0.1 + "1 i.,•01.'g- ''''i ;..9F,e.11,13 i. , kr I i Veal"iL HP.,II taco. . X ,,.! ..9.....4..'L__.., 1\ „Les 1 a ; .8 ,0°';'•',g Inik glITFZEM - ••-•.,_. 1 , , .1*. . ,,„, .. ;..• „ ., p a. , 7.......11.1%gij art par-,,,,app9p6- ! ' i 5 " . ;,-•*4 1;11 fat,.. • A„ -1-44- 11 . ' iirTivai nourniriv th-,..: . ._ ligightedarmg,EN Ertir//Awl it,- . ;/.7 . . r. • .Pt, . ;,;..-;,•- i 400bica3;1 NIS.. - NrItZ,M nrutfly) (area .. .4 1 ....Amel"."4,1 .1011111 Z b..; IC •,,,, Tr----usatzr''.\ .gastztro 4.., c ..1 .La ....,111.,,,,, ,.,O • 10 : 46 • A .. 4 44 /' '4 r *. 0'. FILIMIP! ‘,Or•Akc4.711f4.6111 1 11.1 rj 4 mik,IL Al 4.`• • 0, l '4, .,5 4/ 'I. AV ; , .kult*PrIPRI ,a r." ,•.... ENE , A 4. 1 I! C11666 ..,..' ,-- .!.1111111., , s,45,....te.ITZTI. ,1,ii j-- -- 4 ICA .• 3 •4 ,.. : ‘\' . • 'i ."'" U. '..jcl .• 1,j1r;..,:', 1.17. V4 s E mg i 7"i'."----- ., 1'1-.'" ...c3 - -P9.11 "-" 2( ,. .7', SAM: 1 ... • ?I. ""e'..‘,"•••' " '•".. ..gs "Me.... iiti 1 ti#4,-*„....,,,,, • .t. •••.• •-- - • 1 / , I I,, .4111ki..,,....iusi...:„....../...i...el.,. ..t ....il.Ei...,...._ 1 .e. g &.2.. !,_• ,.., - ,- 1 ,,,asa . . ,1:6 ' • . .A." 5 ; e .".. / • •„„...--'-- "`""".•a...._. -'•-si ,!:k,...,. . .,s 1 ''.3.7'• 1 '4%'\&:.i• 'e.11.. F , r'- i ,s ,,,,,,,,,1 • ,,,,. - ----" auk.'i ..,- * r/ ' i'CL.\•,,A" i,`i 1..•s;,,.V••-g" • _ ._._. ". i . Ls.._.. !"'__.Il.__- 04r. '•, '• 7‘••••°1111;" ."ii ''' ., --- b :..., (3 •A c''''•,•1..1.)"' ; I ,- ! 14 ' •,LaIL-ss' s•i4 II""r` ,‘ , le '' ,,', , fi, •w,.,'•,..144" • '') "!'1 • l'i" '''''''' ''-'1/- :i, r::::Il l'•fg:f.i.,, ‘.4 ''' .." ';'''''je.\:"'' ''''' .4 • •i. I . , i • • •••••.:Ii! ',/ 1„:, '•,•-,,,„, :i ..,_ 1 ' ' ...,.,. 'ler ,...•!.", _I . ,44.______,..1, . 111 •,.. usr„; a. ;.. 'C -',.4/° ' '4"/., ) '. ; 1 ..• , iL... ...- -,;,.\•VI' F...-.11 •';',.4.,,,,'W...4,sr..•...../ ..i' I I ';:. .; ' 0 4 " ..1 i....I .., .fi '•, ..1•'1.. . •. i K., • .t 1 ,, '', Til 2 OM. ..' •'1 ,,.., .,-4 ''''', "' 11 161 i•.11..4 % :r:',./.,,:r 0-• -.L ' ..• il... • . _. . i i '• .i....-.2' d .6... "' - 4 7-,../11'44,^Y.4;,;,.)=.!'crii ;,-, :•f''.;';:.--.'r • ,..., 4• mr. al ,,...•,:r.„,'",.:1,i,,,!P /...",... . A„,•,•4.:•;4/ii Lt ta ':•' :1.'kr i . , V • I If 2 “..... • __i ...,...c,,, ,,a,,1,1, .. f I. , , J.: i,•.2,:f,....6',(.' f., 6. :'•..:IL"'.' . ' 2 .1. 1 `..1!Ilt 1 ;. __11,_ _ ,)-1-41.',A_ :• ,,... ; • ' ..'I., bil,l_t! ,, nah• ... ...,,nt .16..1...4 . •'1. 'q 1 .. '4. . ..-=1-....:-.4'.!. • A ' '4",L.lt..."-'" -„ . -.V.-' t' 1 ••••_ -. •,,,,, 4 ,,'''.''" dh j:(,..:`t .‘•. i. I • 1 I - ,:;,:..":3:,..th(i ,.! 4111F kk--4 2 z- ,.. .• I 1 ••.• 4 ..,. ? _ ....-- i , ".:L.....2„11._.•,/ i ,,, E.• , . I '' -" ::."21. ''' ".*-,. i.:-.*.4''., '..; • *\,..\? 1 • . 4 :;!• .-,",-, 1•, i - -.I --::i. i...!. .1. ,19,;.., !: ,t 03 -,1 oi. 1, k, '.....I• . i ......,, , , .....• .. '"I.,,,.' )i4. ? ,•• 1 ..47 . lam •- • ,,./ I ".';„.'.ti' .,', . t 11 .i, :K , . • 1 . , ...• . 0...,:v;. . • ,2 . • Vs'-. 4,`:.1f7. '''''".' . .. i '''.' ''.." ''' •''- ' ti l' ..:.• " ":"...1 i'..''•'• IY. i ,,, . r,. . . • ..,. ,..... ,,...... ,. ,.. . 1., ,,,, . , , F:.. I.,: :',1,•!,!. .• ,...1 ;.11'...'r 1) ' ''''.„' .. it'4. Ly ?•1;ii----.' ..''' / 1 „ to A .'".' /. ;.1,1: I, A. I 4„.,....,,,„„..ce ! : ...4,.4,,,,..1',,,,,•:'' ,,,:: to ...I..,„ __--, -•,,/,:e • . 4.!.-..114/" 41'•',...p... Y ,-.."1, • 'T•. , ,L .: --4' '. e•,. - r,..': 0.,.'* t'• .!!.12!r,11: • ' ' .. /.4 L. ; .. , . ,: •.;eV' -?ii'.., •'' . ,,,, • I 11. i '''"'''''S,,,.. /7.4. /•••• "L.V. ' ...!":r4:.. &•1„, . II .. I I A,if ., '... .1'.,:t.i;A ' ' pi. • •, . ; . (...., • (,, •v. , ,. t-z, • ...._ .••• -t ' • ( . . (-... . • ' it 7.10 . ,. . • . . . • ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS ' ( • • TO: Finance Department Fire Department . X ' Library Department Park Department. • Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. / Traffic Engineering Div: ' Engineering Div.; ,Utilities. Engineerin .Di g v. ' FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) �l/4,,i,,4. Lam., , it • (by, Gary R. Kruger, Senior Planner Gordo% Y. Ericksen, Planning Director . . SUBJECT: Review of ECF- 295-77 c Application No. : Action Name: RENTON HILL. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN . Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) _, . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: 04l_21G „ Comments: 41' •••'lLerr7 oe-sa ......m.4“, w et A. ...e.-4.:99.4'ler•ora4 R4241• •��. .0 :�++.a. /Ktc� .tll +AC - Aso.. • • Qit.BQ , Gr �.:.J. lre. ai/,`✓aoz:1�'r•e e•e t or.Gc: Signat Director or Authorized Representative Date RECEIVED. CITY OF RENTON' - .HEARING EXAMINER, REVIEW BY 'OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ' • - . A• . '!.IN 1 '31978 P , Department: ) eey . ' �q Comments: ' 7i8.1911011)1f 11'1213141516 ��- ;s rcco►+t 4...d« 'T( 4:.7f 7 4ra.,.f /Lve J /� t'G�i ti1eoi a 5 �.` • • . 'v •///i ii; ' . Signature of ,Director or- uth�d e n . ( � se tat�ve Date EXHIBIT NO. 1/. 6`76 �>� (OVER) . ITEM NO. �C 7 1= �8 • . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ' `' . . • ' . /V' . - . ... -� pF R� . �. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT U \% my.; 7 �, ;, , BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540 o� - "' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 grFa SEPT��e May 24, 1978 CMARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • TO: . Gary Kruger, Planning Department ' FROM:- Building Division . SUBJECT: Renton Hill Building Permit Data ' . Per your request of May 23rd, following is the information we have on file: . 1976 - 1 New Private, Garage ✓ 1 New Single Family Residence' 1 New 2nd Story on Single Family Residence. 1 New, Addition to Single Family Residence/ . • 1977 A. New Private Garage and Lowered Basement. 2 New Single Family Residences ✓ • 1 New 8-Plex 1978 2 New Single Family Residences -. , • • . RECEIVED -• . CITY OF RENTON ✓ v HEARING EXAMINER `.'F41.31978 AM PM 71S,9,I01 111121112►3,415,6 RGN/mp • • OF is s. . 7cs).. tl..."...-..:l',.!.1 C.,...„• . • • . . .. (..t. ►SAY 2,Y ,;..,� !, EXHIBIT ITEM NO. . k' 7 71- 17 - •, RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON GROG RENTON • �7fAMiNER ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM J UN 1 3 78 AM 7r8r9rlO.JIii r1r192r3r4r5r6PM • • FOR UiI-1LE USE (1fILY e,rTon' Ni I. EXHIBIT NO, a� _ . Application go. erJylQee' 0nSi✓e �LI�A�4I✓ham/'.' El ,‘ Environmental Checklist No. �G? -2%��•7_7_ avi �O• �� 7 PkOPOSEU, date: FINAL, date: _/2-2-777 • Declaration of Significance ElDeclar•ation of Significance DID eclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: • Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires • all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environni nt. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. . Please answer th'e following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to yovernment decision makers, include your e'planation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are,aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not jdst to the license for which you are currently applying or 'the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even tf,ouyh completion may nut occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved' to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future'. NUTi : Ihis is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State offashington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to yctrproposal. If a question doe% r.at apply, just answer it "co" and continue on to the nc,t r,t.rstion. • i.NyiHhtiMfNTAL CHtCia1ST FORM 1. ti,CfGRO!JND i. Name of Proponent CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT Address and phone number of Iroponent: _ 200 Mill Avenue-South Renton, Washington 98055 J. Date Checklist.submitted November 16, ,1977 -- --- -- — 4. Agency requiring Checklist Renton Planning Department 5.• Name of proposal, if applicable. -------- Renton Hill Comprehensive Plan Amendment 6. Nature• and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): The proposal is to ,amend the Land Use, Circulation and Community Facilities Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is — attached (see Exhibit A) which includes text and a map. The _ proposal consists of about 600± acres. The Comprehensive Plan guides future development and is implemented by developmental ordinances and capital improvements. 2- g' • , 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well • as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- • 1 mental setting of the proposal): The amendment is bounded on the west by FAI-405, on the north by the Cedar River, on the east by the extension of Edmonds Avenue, and on the south by the powerline easements. The area is illustrated in l Exhibit A. • 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal:. The City Council may adopt the amendment by Spring, 1978. 9. List of•all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal, state and local--including rezones): No permits are required. • to. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: Additional amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are anticipated • in the general area. • • • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by • your proposal? If yes, explain: A few developers/landowners wish to construct apartments. • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal; if none has been completed, bu,t is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: • • An area-wide rezone is expected to be initiated by the City Council, • • • II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • (Explanations of all "yes" and ''maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? x TES Y-B E N b� (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or over- • • covering of the soil? }( YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES WOE Fir (d) The destruction, covering.or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X Yi S RTBE N(i (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes 'in siltation, deposition or erosion which •may modify the channel. of a river or stream or the x bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: YES RITE' AV • .i (2) Air. Will the proposal'result in: 3 (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MAY NU- (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any.change•in climate, eithe4l.localYy or • • regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • • • (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: • (a) Changes in currents, or the course. of direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or • the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE N(1 (c) Alterations to the .course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water • body? X YES MAYBE NO • (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES M YBE Nlf• (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X • • YES FATS N0 (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either • through direct additions or withdrawals,, or through X interception of an aquiferby cuts or excavations? • YES , MAYBE h-tr. _�-- (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, ,either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus ur bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? • X . YES FIATNT NT— • (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available' for public water' supplies? X MAYBE N0-- • • Explanation: • (4) flora. will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? X YE3— RAM' N0 (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X • endangered species of flora? YCS RASE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? • X _ • TB"- MTYB� NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES RAYBE NO Explanation: . (5) Fauna. will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, • insects or microfauna)? X YES RAW NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any• unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? . - X ' YES MAYBE NO (c) introduction of new species of fauna into: an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO • (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES RAYBE NO Explanation: • (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? •( YES MAYBE NO Explahation: — -- ---- ---- --._...____....— -- ' ------ • (7) Light• and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare'? X RI— MAYtiE `ib-- Explanation: (6) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the uresent or planned laud use of an area? X • YES••...iiWat !1T Explanation: It is anticipated thatthe proposal will be adopted and �— -subsequently the multi-family zoning will be changed to single family —zoning,.. This will reduce the intensity of potential development compared to the-present-zoning,---.-..--• •----- _ _ __ _ _ _ (9) Natural Resources'. will the proposal result in: • (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any noorenewahle natural resource? X YES ' MAYBE NG Ex lenation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an exp oT sSon or the release of hazardous substances (including, but. not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X • • irE$ gATIcE N6 Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location', distri- —— - - ofbutannarea?density, or growth rate of the human population X ,YES MAYBE 0- • Explanation: As indicated in item 8 above, the density of potential development (dwelling units) will be reduced, which will reduce_the _ ' potential number of people which can live in the area. .. Y (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: A (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X YES M 1AYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X VET- WOW 1111- (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X ' YEN MAYBE NO (f) 'Increase in traffic.hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ;( YEN RIMY 4o • Explanation: The proposed amendment to the Circulation Element would not change the existing circulation system and would eliminate the proposed extension of streets into ,the planning area. • • (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? X • YES MAYBE NC (b) Police protection? X YES •M YBE NO (c) Schools? • X • YES MAYBE NO _�------- (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) 'Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? X YES M- NO • Explanation:, The proposal recommends that a parcel be amended from low density multi=faits r creation, which will provide opporrtunities. for the expansion o} the cedar River Trail System. A1cn. _thp expanclnn of Phillip Arnold Park is recommended. Any expansion of the park system will cause increased--oiaintenance costs. - (15) Energy. Will 'the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X. YES „A H NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Y E S_ FATE Fir E.p anation: • (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? X Y15 M-AYHE NO (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X ' YES MAYBE NO • • r, -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X • YES MAYS NO • • (e) Storm water drainage? X • YES RATFE W-- • (f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • • • • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the.creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? - X YE3— MU w • Explanation: A reduction in potential density infers that should all or a o ion of Renton Hill collapse due to the existing coal mines, there shg�a reduction in human andproperty loss anchor amage compared to the densities permitted by the existing Land Use Element. (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive • • site open to public view? YES MAYBE I10 Explanation: The ,reduction of intensity of development provided by the Land Use, Element will preserve and enhance views by the reduction in intensity of zoning. • Less intensive zoning will decrease height limits, increase setbacks, and reduce the bulk of potential buildings. (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE N� Explanation: The proposal includes a recommendation to expand a park and increase the amount of land designated recreation. If the proposal is adopted, this will increase recreational opportunities. (20) Archeological Historical. Will the proposal result in an • alteration of� a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X YES mu— W6— Explanation: The proposal would encourage the preservation of the existing single family buildings, some of which may have historical significance, since it is an older part of the city. • 111. SIGNATURE • 1, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is 'understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack/of f 1 disclosure o pert. Proponent: ea ordon Y. E ' ksen, Planning Director (name prtn ,d") • • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • • • ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Finance Department Fire Department )X Library Department © Park Department. . Police Department • • Public Works Department Building Diva ✓ Traffic Engineering Div. ' Engineering Div.,. Utilities Engineering Div.' FROM: Planning Department, (signed by responsible official or his designee) A . !1. /;.„.-,9„ / (by - Gary R. Kruger, Senior Planner) Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 295-77 ; Application No. : Action Name: RENTON HILL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Please review the attached. Review requested by (date) :_.32_.7J REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: Department: OGJ�6,- Comments : n / ` � ---� S"r2eet aU;/7 2-G.�c�' Y� rG. ,�¢e' n • a,2c&;; t✓ .��J lr.e.. Os., /:7cc 2;i/.v� .�-,-,,oe, a r/c.e- -1,44?erc G' erm q,. /�;.o.,< .a�o...oOfe.;.i Signaty.r-eo Director or_ Authorized Representative Date . REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Departmeht: _ n T.jhc.. • Comments : -�+ ;s. ,c-e e o rn. ,H Q,.tde e( 7" i. -rt., a ra-1.1- 4✓-c_ Co n n e c , s .o Tv -Po-i-i .e.-1- �r i v e- 64,e, `,e e_Td i A.a of a_ s 4'..` a (�eY n.c.Tc rr e,c.2 s�1 0 -1-r+ a c ce SS ]`��e._ 64'/l 4 rt.-` Signature of Director or Uthorized a iesentative Date • 6-76 • (OVER) • • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS: • Department: U1iUi Comments : ,� ��n• ,�s_ %� a.� .�t,� _}:{.l.< <L�.� ..,,Le .�C �+� �a c e .Z��e C • -L 4. 4' Z4( •90.-.7“-----0 9a+c. CL...a. .•� ,Z.:..Z .1 4« ---, .��.['..i.,:< 7.-+r..--a..•--� -1\ Signature f Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CIT.Y DEPARTMENTS: Department: TFILNe Comments : w a . - accens ku �'`�,�s�. \\aA �s,1/4 r¢,crscYwn.w • Signature of Director o uthori zed Representative • Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department:. PARKS & RECREATION Comments : The City should look into the possibility of acquiring property to the south east of Phillip Arnold Park which should be left in a natural state and act as a. buffer zone between the existing park and the power transmission lines and right-of-way. • ---- ✓ -�- -- 12/.1/77__ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: • Comments : • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ' 11ECEIVED CITY OF RENTON " Ex A b,t. HEARING EXAMINER WUN 1 31978 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT AM PM 718o91I0111,i2e1I2t3i4,5,6 OCTOBER 12, 1977 • EXHIBIT NO. Z 1 TO: • Planning Commission Members FROM: Clark Teegarden , Chairman ITEM NO. /78i �d Comprehensive Planning Committee RE : • CITY COUNCIL. REFERRAL '- RENTON HILL AREA • REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING • INTRODUCTION : Sy action •of the Planning Commission at its public hearingmeeting g on the above subject . matter, the Comprehensive.; Planning Committee was requested to study the . area in question and report back to the . Commission on October 12 , 1977. The attached public hearing notice (public, hearing , September 14 , 1977) describes the .area to be con- sidered and is generally defined as the Renton Hill Comprehensive Planning Area . (Refer to Public Hearing Notice, ) For the purposes of the Committee ' s deliberations , the Comprehensive P eve Plan is defined as the offical statement of the City of Renton establishing. Major policies concerning desirable . future development . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - DEFINITION AND PURPOSE : The Comprehensive Plan consists, Of the Goals , Objectives , and Poli- cies ; Land Lite. Element ; Circulation Element; Community Facilities Element ; and Definitions . Proposed developments should be reviewed . against the Comprehensive Plan to insure that growth is consistent With the. Plan.. • The purposes of the Comprehensive Plan are : . ' • 1 To improve the physical and 'social environment of the , city as a .setting for human activities - to Make it more, functional , beautiful , decent, healthful , interesting , and efficient; ':1 . . . . .. . . • . . • . ••.. • 4 . . . . • . . . e ............. OTICE.............__PUBLIC N • . • • PUBLIC HEAR JUG • „...„.„....._ • . CITY. OF RENTON ' • • . . . PLANNING COMMISSION • • • • • • . • . . • . • A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNINGCOMMISSION ' . IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON . ' SEPTEMBER 14 1977, AT ,8:00 P.M. . TO CONSIDER THE ITEM DESCRIBED BELOW: • . • . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . : . • . . . • ' PURPOSE: TO REVIEW THE COMPREHENSiVE PLAN IN THE RENTON HILL. AREA, PARTICULARLY THE MULTI-FAMILY-RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATED LAND USE IN THE VICINITY OF CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH. THE. RENTON HILL AREA IS THAT AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY FAI-405 ON THE WEST, COO - • . . RIVER ON THE NORTH,. THE HILLSIDE AND UNDEVELOPED AREA ON THE • . . EAST,' AND THE POWERLINE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON .THE SOUTH. . . . . . . . . - \ IV„tr•!'1:i i:1':ill 34 1 A....:-.4. ii,..ri 4.....,;: _ • . • ....„......- ..\:,.., . 4 i;C,!.. . F. IA; Ii; i •L !, i ' pfork.-.• •.•...:-..'..4--, .' •%,,,.•• --*-------''''. - -- \ • s',\•';•. ...e- — , ,,:f.tZ. r;::r:i."•,: ; ia.:§ 1jr.1:; d. l!lirij.. " i ' N-- - \• \ . • \N. . 'e.i • If .:: 11::1611.; '• : :: ' . ‘,4, ; 1,:-.:•- • . s., , • Ill li ' " !;:'I.'''. r: ? . ;, : '';. : 4:".:-- I .H. N . i 1:41 .3 1.i' d.i.. . '. . d..* r't ' v j.•.::. .; • - - ! ,. . • < ' .s. . . . 11 , •. .:-. .. : ) ... .. . : c • :i.• ! I. iL...•- . t ' 1 3 -er...i - late i • . . , . . ... ,...... / . 111 • a ,. t , , ,. / : , . • j `..... .,,, ft.ii 4,li 1!I 1 Li ; :.: i 1 __ A.#. Pr! • •; , ' i Li.,.. •-f\4) it " • •?3; 1. I 1".. g ! ;7 t • '!' . I:. i :. • . ..4 • , . ' A-qv , 1 . . , ,j 1 /' ii II , . .. .' ri... •LN t. " '. ' I 41f117-77' c ji:: !.'• ; • - 61 t .r..! ;!. .• . ::- . Liji--...‘x,,, .. 11:! 1...-) ' . ; . .. ;!- --7 .-.F.4..............K, • •-- -- . --- • •r- ii ,i- ; ;. • , . . i. -.1-1.„i- -_;.• , ss . . I;, -....tiL. ....„• pii ,a • ,...,--- - _i• ,. - '.... , •. i d _, • c. . .; I" ,...7., •. - -_....i. . • • , 5 u , : :-, :!‘,.. _;I:jr.-,..1 ..• . ---.--at • . 1 //ill.-•- ig1'...1 '.." i0"•":I .1----.* .- I //.,:' i •:",. . ' • .- -1t_r ----i_LI-_1. .._- •,..,.....-- .....::—- .- -".s. ••- •*",..c.'!`" L • • . . ....„ :.,,...:: ;......,,,.... -,, 41 ..... • • . .,.. ...„ • . .- ' ..[1 .11 . . . . ' - THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT COMMENTS IN. WRITING. . IF ADDITiONAL, INFORMATION. IS DESIRED, CONTACT: • . . CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550 MUNICIPAL BUILDING; 200 MILL AVE. S. . , . . . lir Comprehensive Planning Committee Report October 12 , 1977 Page Two To promote the public interest , the interest of the city at large as well as the interests of individuals , or special groups; To facilitate th.e democratic determination and imple menta- tion ementa- tion of city policies on development; I To effect political and technical coordination in development; To inject long—range considerations into the determination of short-range actions ; and • To bring professional and technical knowledge to bea r on the making of political decisions on the development of the city. The Comprehensive Plan is intended to serve as a guide to help resolve some of the development problems confronting municipal officials and the people they represent. The Plan takes into account existing con- ditions and future needs , and attempts to express the best reasonable consensus that can be achieved at a given time as to the character and direction of future growth . . The Plan is of necessity general in its proposals . It must be f since it is impossible. to flexible , predict all future events which may affect the community . The Plan is not a zoning ordinance , although it makes significant recommendations .for future land use. The Plan is not pre- cise. It does not represent engineerin engineering nor does it claim • to predict exactly the future use of evey parcel . 'of pro er insure that growth is consistent with the ComprehensiveP P ty' or Plan. • Comprehensive Planning Committee Report October 12 , 1977 Page Three. In order for the Plan to maintain effectiveness , it should be reviewed periodically. Conditions might change and unforeseen events may occur which might necessitate a re-evaluation. BACKGROUND: • As background to the study of the area in' question , the Commit tee con- d!!cted a field trip of. the area . involved and studied in detail the existing land use , the characteristics of the existing development, and the physical features of' the land, including topography and drainage . During the course of the work sessions by the committee , representatives from property owners in the Hill area were present end.. provided input in the matters discussed . . The matter of .access was considered in some detail in terms of the existing street rights-of-way, traffic circulation , existing street conditions ; the parking .and access problems to individual properties , as well as the matter of general traffic circulation . The study area for comprehensive planning purposes Overlapped into adjacent areas ; and , therefore , the study of the committee encompasses areas beyond the immediate boundaries of the Renton Hill area , particu- larly as it relates to traffic circulation , potential development,. need for community facilities , and general area-wide impact of future development. • The consideration of the committee was basically restricted to o con- sideration Of the Comprehensive Plan elements : land use , circulation and community facilities . In regard to said elements , the natural charac tprigticc of the area were also considered. • Comprehensive Planning Committee Report October 12 , 1977 Page Four LAND USE ELEMENT: FINDINGS : 1 .- The Renton Hill area is primarily a single family residential neighborhood with some limited apartment and duplex use inter- • , mixed. . The extent of multi -family residential development is limited at this time and is primarily concentrated along Mill Avenue South. and located westerly of Cedar'. 2. Physical characteristics of the area indicate that, while an older area of the community, the area is basically sound in terms of both building and general physical potential- for upgrading . This potential is presently being recognized by many property owners • in the area , and the area is considered a desirable single family residential neighborhood . 3. While the area has been in a state of transition , with increased . land values , the physical amenities of the Hill area , such as view, makes the area highly desirable for residential development . 4 . The existing Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for Rent on Hill is primarily single family residential with low and medium density multi-family residential designations between Mill Avenue South and Cedar Avenue South and extending southerly to and includ- ing a larger tract of medium density multi - family residential located at the soiuthwesterly edge of the Hill area . The hillside areas to. the north are presently designated as greenbelt , with the existing industrial development adjacent to the railroad right-of-way and a low density multi - family designation to the • Comprehensive Planning Committee Report October 12 , 1977 Page Five north adjacent to the Cedar River. 5. The area includes several large tracts of undeveloped areas , which represent both potential single family and multi -family residential development. Development in accordance with the present plan would result in increased land use densities . 6. The Committee also reviewed the geological conditions of the Hill area , including consideration regarding mines previously located in the area. It was initially recognized that the Hill has large underlying coal beds , some of these beds having been mined-out . Said coal beds represent not only a future energy resource potential but also a hazard to any surface development in terms of possible mine subsidance . The extent of such development hazard is unknown and will vary with location . It is recognized, however, such hazards must be considered in terms of existing and future development. CIR.CULATI'ON: ' 1 . The Committee initially recognizes that the presen t t circulation o Renton. Hill is restricted to one access point (at Third and Mill ) , which essentially creates a large cul -de-sac-type situation . 2. The present 40 foot street rights-of-way restrict acces s and limit parking , particularly in that area north of South' 7th Street . The existing topography precludes any substantial improvement of existing rights-of-way to allow improved access and parking. Comprehensive Planning Committee Report October 12 , 1977 Page Six 3. The parking for the residential uses is primarily on-street rather than off-street; and it is recognized that topography limitations preclude, in many cases , development of acceptable' off-street parking spaces . 4. Increased traffic has occurred as the result of the extensive use of Phillip Arnold Park located at the top of the Hill . This impact is particularly noticeable on Renton Avenue.. On-street parking has also impacted the adjacent residential neighborhood . 5 . The existing Arterial Street Plan indicates the extension of Mill Avenue extending in a southeast direction ; connecting to a secondary arterial serving the Tiffany Park area . The present Plan also projects the extension of Grant Avenue South from South 11th to Puget Drive. 6. The extension of Mill Avenue South with the connection as proposed p osed does not appear to be physically feasible due to the existing devel - opment that has occurred and the steep topography. 7. New development of any type would , in the opinion of the committee , further impact the existing circulation system unless alternative means of access were provided to serve the area . The Committee further recognizes , however , that providing additional access could further compound the existing problem and make the situation more critical . COMMUNITY FACILITIES : 1 . The existing park has been utilized as a facility. serving beyond and the immediate neighborhood. The basic result has been an increase Comprehensive Planning Committee Report October 12 , 1977 Page Seven in traffic circulation problems beyond those created immediate residents of the Hill area: by the 2. The existing park facility., however, is' y full de used intensively by the community at large. The and is • e Renton School Distric� presently has a 10 acre eiementary. school site located east of said - erly park. A school development at this site is not contem- plated at this time or. in the near ,future, due to the limited • elementary population that might potentially attend said sc hool . • NATURAL SYSTEMS : 1 . The . Hill area ; due .to its nature , has large and areas with ,steep slopes , undeveloped hillside providing a ,natural greenbelt drainage • system. • • 2. Disturbance through new development represents a in terms of slide's and ,inc problems .reased runoffPotential hazard RECOMMENDATIONS : Based. on its analysis , the Committee recommends as . f LANs: ol,lows : 1 . Recognizing the existing physical limitations of the Hill area , the Committee recommends that the .Hill area north of Lthe Puget • Sound Power and Light Company transmission right-of-Way designated as 'single famil ' be y residential . , • 2. The steep hillside areas , powerline rights-o - f waY . and natural drainage courses be established as greenbelt areas , in addition to those presently designated on the Comprehensiv e e La,nd Use • Plan . N • • Conprehens i.ve Planning Committee Report October 12 , 1977 • Page Eight CIRCULATION : 1 . The land use designations as reflected in the existing Compre- hensive Plan was based upon provision of additional access .to the Renton Hill area to the south and southeast. The extension Of Mill Avenue South is not physically feasible ; and, therefore , .it is recommended by the Committee that such designation on the Arterial Street Plan be deleted. 2 . Extensive input on the part of the residents in the Hill area indicates the desire to continue the limited access to the Hill ( Third and Mill ) as it is presently constituted. The purpose of such limitation is ' to enhance the amenities of the Hill area as a residential community and preclude through access . It is , • therefore , further recommended that the proposed Grant Avenue connection to Puget Drive be deleted as an alternate means of • access to the Hill . 3. It is recognized that improved access will be necessary to serve the properties to the south and southeast of the Renton Hill area at such time as they are developed . The intent of the Committee ' s recommendations . is that such access be provided from the south . COMMUNITY FACILITIES : 1 . Retain the present community facilities designations for the Renton Hill area , including the park and school Site , recognizing that the use of the school site for an elementary school may or may not be feasible in the near future. s I ,t i • Comprehensive Planning Committee Report October 12 , 1977 Page Nine 2. The Committee further recommends that the Citypursue p rsue the possibil - ity of expansion of Phillip Arnold Park to the southeast, since it appears that the potential area would allow reasonable expansion of said facility. 3. The area designated low density multi-familyresidential to, the' Cedar River north of the railroad adjacent be redesignated future recreation , • • 10 OF ---.. - - ------- �..S_� 1 r I CA ICE/ i UI� S I GN I F I CA CE Penton Hi l l Application, ;,o .• i=oE.brehEnsive Plan Amendment PPOPOSED Declaration Ery i ron�-er. tal ChecE: l i s t No . EFC-295- 77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the Renton Hill area . Proponent -__— _ C ITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT Location of Proposal RENTON HILL AREA • grad Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT -nis proposal has been determined to si .. nficant adverse impact upon the environment .e A not have a Q is not required under ,, EIS 0 is ace aftern review the SRC;; G3 . 21C . O3„ ( 2..) ( c ) , . This decision was checklist and other yinformationgoncfile with y of a �the tlead ed nagencyental agency . Pe6sons for declaration of environmental si • nifica.nce : • -_ .��- -.-�---�.--ice_-.-----_----__�---_..-- ' et, ; ;lres , if any , that could be environmental_ taken to prevent or mitigate a l ir•pacts to such an e the �•. thor,:,ti Its declaration of significance ``iat the lead agency would declaration c * , n fica . ce and issue a ( proposed/ final ) ` non- S 1 qr; 1 * i Car;-e ; RECEIVED EXHIBTTTT NO. ,-,? HEARING EXAMINER - - ITEM NO-. '- ' 7- - - -- — ------ Are PM • responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen itle r' lannih Dir ctor • -- - - -- --_-_ _ Date December 2 , 1977 , r ;nature City of Renton Planning Oenartr•ent • ee.'*°' . "• EHICLE VOLUME SUMMtjAh1)I1' . j '_ I r p CITY OF RENTON ITEM NOS _— �d — 7/ S 3RD ST E OF MILL AVE S WB ITEM 1�1 A .M. VOLUMES P.M. VOLUMES 15 MIN• HOURLY TIME 15 MIN. HOURLY 02/22/78 * 12 : 15 * 18 AEUNESDAY * 12: 30 * 8 1 * 12:45 * 13 2 3 * 01 :00 * 10 49 * 01 : 15 * 18 * 01 :30 * 9 1 * 01 :45 * 18 1 2 * 02: 0.0 * 11 56 * 02: 15 * . 9 * 0 2 :3 0 * 13 * 02 :45 * 10 1 1 * 03 :00 * RECEIVED ' 16 48 * 03: 15 * CITY OF RENTON 18 * 0 3 : 3 0 * HEARING EXAMINER 14 1 * 03:45 * JUN131978 21 1 * 04 :00 * Au P113 66 1 * 04 , 30 * 71R1911811111211.121111415, ib 3 * 04 :45 * • 25 4 * 05:00 * 10 62 1 4 05: 15 * 17 1 4 05 :30 * 19 3 * 05: 45 * 14 9 14 * 06 :00 * 24 74 12 * 06: 15 * 16 13 * 06: 30 * 15 23 . * 06: 45 * 12 20 68 * 07.: 00 * 16 59 22 *. 07: 15 * _ 11 P7 * 07 : 30 * 12 36 * 07 : 45 * 13 25 110 * 08 :00 * 10 46 15 * 08: 15 * 9 15 * 08:30 * 6 17 * 08 : 45 * ' 7 12 59 * 09 :00 * 7 29. 13 * 09: 15 * . 13 6 * 09 : 30 * 6 10 * '09:'45 * 11 10 39 * 10:00 4 7 . 37 13 02/21/78 • * 10: 15' * . . 6 14 TUESDAY * 10: 30 * 3 13 * 10: 45. * 3 8 48 - * 11 :00 * 3 15 13 * 11 : 15. 4. 4 10 - * 11 :30 * '3 6 • 11 :45 * .3 . 18 . 47 * 12 :00 * 1 11 PEAK VOL- UMES. 'OF : -11'O . FROM 07 : 00 TO 08 : 00 A,M. AND 74 FROM 05: 00 TO 06:00 Psi AM PEAKING FACTOR 0. 11 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0.07 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.76 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR .0.74. 24 HOUR VOLUME. 948 16 HOUR VOLUME 897 . EXPANSION. FACTOR 1 .00 ADJUSTED 24 HOUR VOLUME 00001 .00 y ''it4ICLE VOLUME SUMMARY411 CITY OF RENTON S 3R0 ST F. OF MILL AVE S •EB A.M. VOLUMES PO* VOLUMES 15 MIN. HOURLY TIME 15 MIN. HOURLY 1 02/22/78 * 12: 15 * 17 2 WEDNESDAY * 12: 30 * 14 2 * 12: 45 * 10 5 * 01 :00 * 19 . 60 3 * 01 : 15 * 12 * 01 :30 * 8 * 01 :45 * 12 3 6 * 02:00 * 14 46 * 02: 15 * 24 1 * 02: 30 * 13 2 * 02:45 * 16 3 * 03:00 * 16 69 1 * 03: 15 * 25 * 03:30 * 24 1. * 03:45 * 23 2 * 04 :00 * 29 101 * 04 : 15 * 19 * 04:30 * 20 1 * 04 :45 * 32 1 * 05:00 * 21 92 * 05: 15 * 35 * 05 :30 * 29 1 * 05:45 * 29 1 2 * 06:00 * 27 120 1 * 06: 15 * 2,3 1 * 06 :30 * 21 5 * 06:45 • 22 2 9 * 07:00 * 15 81 1 * 07 : 15 * 16 1 * 07 : 30 * 10 2 * 07 : 45 * 9 4 A . * 08: 00 * 13 A8 4 * 08: 15 * . 12 4 * 08 : 30 * 7 14 * 08 :45 * 8 7 29 * 09:00 * 20 *7 5 * 09: 15 • 11 11 * 09 : 30 * 17 . 7 * 09: 45 * 14 5 28 * 1.0:00 * . . 12 54 . 14 02/21/78 * 10: 15 * 11 7 TUESDAY * 10:30 * 10 9 * 10: 45 * 6 12 42 * 11 :00 * 7 34 9 * 11 : 16 * 2 7 *: 11 :30 * 6 15 * 11 : 45 * 4 14 '. 45. * 12 :00 * 8 $0 PEAK VOLUMES OF ' 45 FROM 11 : 00 T0, 12 : 00 A.M. AND ' 120 FROM 05 :00 TO 06: 0,0 P.M. 'o AM PEAKING FACTOR 0•04 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0• 12 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0• 75 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0085 • 24 HOUR VOLUME 952 1.6 HOUR VOLUME 879 EXPANSION FACTOR 1 .00 ADJUSTED 24 HOUR VOLUME '00001 .00 -,--1'' ` HICLE VOLUME SUMMARY CITY OF RENTON RENTON AVE S S OF _S 3RD ST TOTAL A.M. VOLUMES P.M. VOLUMES 15 MIN . HOURLY TIME 15 MIN. HOURLY 1 02/22/78 * 12 : 15 ' * 21 1 WEDNESDAY * 12 :30 * 12 1 * 12: 45 * 17 2 5 * 01 : 00 * 19 69 * 01 : 15 * 20 1 . •.- * 01 : 3 0 * 11 1 * 01 : 45 * 26 4 6 * 02:00 * 16 73 * 02: 15 * 21 1 * 02: 30 * 19 1 * 02:45 * 18 1 3 * 03:00 • 19 77 1 * 03: 15. * 29 * 03: 30 * 32 _ * 03:45 * 26 1 * 04 :00 * 30 117 * 04: 15 • 19 * 04:30 * 24 3 • 04 :45 * 32 1 4 * 05:00 * 20 95 * 05: 15 * 3.2 1 * 05: 30 * 26 1 * 05:45 * 27 '9 11 * 06:00 * 26 111 9 * 06 : 15 * 23 10 * 06: 30 * 20 13 4 06 : 45 * 21 16 48 * 07:00 * 16 80 19 * 07 : 15 * 13 16 * 07 : 30 * 13 22 • 07: 45 * 13 17 74 * 08: 00 * 14 53 14 * 08: 15 * 9 15 * 08:30 * 8 19 • 08 :45 * 13 10 58 * 09:00 * 15 45 12 * 09: 15 * 19 9 • 0 9: 3 0 * 17 13 * 09: 45 * 14 10 44 * 10:00 * 10 60 15 * i0: 15 * 5 12 * 10 :30 4 5 11 02/.21/78 * 10:45 * 3. 14 52 TUESDAY * 1i :00 * 6 19 18 * 11 : 15 * 3 11 * 11 :30 * . .5 16 •. * 1 1 : 4 5 *. 3 17 62 * 12:00 * 4 15 :. . PEAK VOLUMES OF 74 FROM 07:.00 TO 08: 00 A.M. AND 117 FROM 03:00 TO 04:00 P.M. AM PEAKING FACTOR. 0. 06 PM PEAKING FACTOR 0.09 AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 3.84 PM PEAK HOJR FACTOR 0.91. 24 ' HOUR VOLUME 1182 16 HOUR VOLUME 1118 EXPANSION FACTOR ,..100.•...' ADJUSTED 24 HOUR VOLUME 00001 .00 .. S.4ICLE VOLUME SUMMARY CITY OF RENTON MILL AVE S S OF S 3RD ST TOTAL 4.M. VOLUMES • P .M. VOLUMES 15 MIN. HOURLY TIME 15 MIN. HOURLY 1 02/22/78 * 12: 15 * 24 5 WEDNESDAY * 12:30 * 17 1 * 12: 4 5 • 9 7 * 01 :00 * 7 57 * 01 : 15 * 7 5 * 01 :30 * 6 1 * 01 :45 * 8 6 * 02 :00 * 16 97 * 02: 15 * 8 2 * 02 : 30 * 11 1 * 02:45 * 7 3 6 * 03: 00 * 9 35 * 03: 15 * 15 3 * 03: 30 * 10 4 * 03: 45 * 14 7 * 04:00 * 10 49 * 04: 15 * 15 * 04 :30 * 14 * 04 :45 * 12 * 05 :00 * 15 56 * 05 : 15 * 12 * 05:30 * .18 2 * 05:45 * 17 2 * 06:00 * 25 72 4 * 06 : 15 * ', 9 2 * 06: 30 * 7 4 * 06 : 45 * 25 9 19 * 07:00 * 19 60 3 * 07: 15 * 18 8 * 07:30 * 15 , 5 * 07 :45 * 12 8 24 * 08 :00 * 16 61 11 * 08: 15 • 19 3 * 08:30 * 5 4 * 08:45 * 6 10 28 * 09 :00 * . 10 60... 7 * 09: 15 * 22 6 * 09:30 * 15 11 * 09: 45 * '17 12 36 02/21/78 * 10:00 * 2 56 6 TUESDAY * i0: 15 *• 6 3 * 10:30 * 4 11 * 10: 45 * 3 10 30 * 11 :00 * 2 15 10 * 11 : 15 * 3 7 - - * 11 : 30 * a 8 " . * 11 :45 * 6 7 '. 32 * 12:00 * . 4 15 PEAK VOLUMES OF . 38 . FROM 10 :30 TO 11 : 30 A.M. AND 77 FROM 06: 30 ' TO 07:30 , P.M.' AM PEAKING FACTOR 0. 05 . PM PEAKING FACTOR 0. 10. AM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0. 79 PM PEAK HOUR FACTOR 0.77 . 24 HOUR VOLUME 750 16 HOUR VOLUME , 692 EXPANSION FACTOR 1 :00 ADJUSTED 24 HOUR VOLUME 00001 .00 RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON SUITE 206 HEARING EXAMINER 16625 REDMOND WAY f IR 1 31978 REDMOND, WA 98052 AM PM (206) 883-8814 7,t3,9i llt121112►:31415,6 APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS FRANK R. RANEY, MAI, ARA EXPERIENCE: Owner, Raney Appraisal Service. Performed independent contract appraisals on all types of properties, as industrial, commercial, residential, rural recreational and agricultural properties and extensive condemnation work. Properties appraised include service stations, retail properties, dwellings, parks and recreational sites. shopping centers, gravel pits , apartment complexes and similar properties in urban, suburban and.rural areas. Valuations of large tracts and of historical tracts for Indian Claims Commission. Typical clients include State Department of Highways, State Parks and Recreation Comm- ission, City of Bellevue, Wa. , and other municipalities, U. S. Department of Justice. GSA, Bonneville Power Administration, Army Corps of Engineers and other federal and state units. individuals and business firms. Prepared and reviewed appraisals for National Park Service over a territory comprising the western half of the United States. Reviewed appraisals by fee and staff persons. Prepared gross estimates of land value of proposed park sites. Established standards and specifica- tions for preparation of appraisals far National Park Service, including outlining needs for special purpose appraisals, as for life estates. scenic easements, retention of timber rights or mineral rights. etc. Served on Park Planning and Study teams to study feasibility of park. rate of development of individual parks, access areas to scenic or historic sites ap- propriateness of commercial development and permitted uses. `. As contract appraiser. worked extensively on urban and rural park lands. on beach lands. lake frontages, river islands and other urban and rural recreational lands. Prior experience includes staff and review appraiser, National Park Service, 1966-68: staff appraiser, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1961-66. and Work Unit Conservationist, Soil Conservation Service, 1946-61 . EDUCATION AND TRAINING: Graduate, University of Idaho, 1944, B. S. Degree in Agricultural Economics. Special training includes American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers' courses I, II, ill (Rural), IV (Condemnation), VI (Capitalization by Ellwood), and American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers' course on Rural Appraisal, and SRA course on Apart- ment Appraisal. Completion of numerous seminars on right of way, land use, environment- al matters, etc. COURT EXPERIENCE:. Qualified as expert real estate valuation witness in Superior Courts of Washington State, in Federal Court and with the Department of Justice in Indian Claims Cases. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Member, American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers (MAI) Accredited Rural Appraiser (ARA), American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Ap- praisers. Member, Columbia Basin Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers. ITEM NO. f% -7f .... RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE SUITE 206 16625 REDMOND WAY REDMOND. WA 98052 (206) 883-8814 RURAL APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS FRANK R. RANEY, MAI, ARA Owner, Raney Appraisal Service: Independen4- appraisals on fee or contract on all types of properties, including rural. recreational, agricultural, industrial, commercial, resid- ential; etc. National Park Service: (1966-68) Reviewed appraisals prepared by fee or staff apprais- ers from many segments of the area west of the Mississippi River, for the purpose of Nat- ional Parks acquisition. Specific emphasis was on San Juan Islands of Washington, Nez Perce Park in Idaho, rural lands in Colorado, North Dakota, Arizona and California.Per- sonally prepared full appraisal reports on many of these lands, including properties with natural wonders, historic sites, forested lands, farm land, residential and commercial properties. Unique assignments included appraisal of life estates and scenic easements. Bureau of Indian Affairs: (1961-66) Fair market value and fair annual rental of tribal and Indian trust lands in Washington, Oregon and Idaho. Lands included timber, mineral sites, potential and devel oped irrigated and dry farming areas, grazing lands, commercial, ind- ustrial, residential, resort and recreational sites. Types of transactions for which appraisals were required were acquisition, disposal, partition and exchange of lands, leases for farming, grazing, industrial and business uses, rights of way for utilities, canals, roads, etc. Frequently, lands presented an exceptional range of problems and types in partial takings, severance, damages, easements, special use rights, water and grazing rights, conversion,to a higher or lower use or multiple uses, etc. Real estate iappraised ranged from unimproved desert lands to improved urban properties. Soil Conservation Service: (1946-61) Administration of work unit and coordination of work of personnel, including range specialists, hydrologists, foresters. soils scientists, engineers, farm planners, etc. Included land use studies, estimation of alternative enter- prises and feasibilities, income potentials of alternate enterprises, studies of soil, water and vegetative cover in various locations in Washington and Idaho. Dry land areas of high and low rainfall, grazing lands, timber lands and irrigation farming areas comprised the types of lands. Experience in irrigation includes working with farmers in a newly ir- rigated area of the Columbia Basin in Washington State between 1955 and 1961 at Pasco, Washington and at Moses Lake, Washington. Worked closely with agricultural engineers, irrigation specialists, farmers, to develop irrigation systems, level land, select crops . etc. Also included advisemen' on leases, terms, etc. , for absentee landlords and crop share farmers: also farmers with minimal capital and little experience in irrigation farm- ing. The 800 operating irrigated units at Moses Lake required work in reservoir construc- tion, sprinkler irrigation, pipe laying, ditching, land leveling, etc. Cost sharing, ease- ments, etc. . to solve drainage problems arising from irrigation were also worked out. RANEY APPRAISAL SERVICE SUITE 206 16625 REDMOND WAY REDMOND, WA 98052 (206) 883-8814 RECREATIONAL LANDS APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS FRANK R. RANEY, MAI, ARA Owner, Raney Appraisal Service. As fee or contract appraiser, have worked extensively on urban and rural park lands. Experience includes preparing fair market value apprais- als of improved and unimproved lands in Green River Gorge and Marymoor Park in King County, on beach lands of the Washington coast, and assistance in appraisal of extensive lake frontage lands, islands in the Columbia River, and Fort Lawton. Also studies of ac- quisition costs for proposed parks in urban and semi-urban areas of Washington. Compre- hensive consultation service with staff members of State Parks and Recreation Commission. Employed by contract with State and Federal agencies and several cities in park acquisi- tion. While with the National Park Service, prepared and reviewed appraisals over a territory comprising the western half of the United States. The property appraised included all types and classes of land, as resort and. recreational sites, commercial, industrial and res- idential real estate in areas ranging from wilderness areas to metropolitan properties . These lands were acquired for inclusion in the National Park System. Performed comprehensive review of real estate appraisals prepared by fee and staff ap- praisers in urban, suburban and rural areas. Prepared gross estimates of land value of proposed National Park sites. This required an overall value of the land and acquisition costs and alternative plans with alternate costs of acquisition. The data were presented to Congress prior to that body's introduction of enabling legislation for new acquisition to the Park system of recreational lands. Established standards and specifications by which fee appraisers would prepare appraisals for the Park Service. This included outlining needs for special purpose appraisals, as for life estates, scenic easements. retention of timber and mineral rights, etc. Served on Park Planning and Study Teams to study feasibility of park, rate of development of individual parks, access areas to scenic or historic sites, appropriateness of commercial development and permitted concessions. ® THE CITY OF RENTON Z • MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 p IMMO CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT pA 235-2550 O,p� CO SEP1��� MEMORANDUM June 15 , 1978 TO: •L: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner FROM: •Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning. Director • BY: Gary R. Kruger, Senior Planner RK RE: Renton •Hill Rezone--Phase I File .No. , R-178-78; City of. Renton Request for Rezone In response to your memo of June 14., the .subject property • was zoned GS-1 prior to October, 1963, when it was ' • rezoned R-3. RECEIVED GRK: jb CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JUN 2 01978 AM PM 71Hi9110,1111211,213141516 EXHIBIT NO. ',3:)7 ITEM NO. - /71- RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON • HEARING EXAMINER 'I AM It41 61978 . PM . n,R1n111►11111212 121301.516 a RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER ®F � JU( 2 01978 4A AM Pfl U 41 � PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7,R1911011111211'213.4150 CIO BUILDING DIVISION 235 -2540 Op MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 O 14r SEP���®� June 16, 1978 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI 1 r -rm - ' f MAYOR �1 �`�� i 1 _,. ITEM NO. , _ -' , TO: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner FROM: Building Division SUBJECT: Building Activity on Renton Hill • Following is the requested list of building permits for new construction and remodeling on Renton Hill for the years 1963 through 1978 to date: ADDITIONS, REMODELING NEW CONSTRUCTION & GARAGES 1963 1 Residence 8 1 6-Unit Apartment 1964. 1 Residence 7 1965 1 Residence 4 1966 2 Residences 2 1 7-Unit Apartment 1967 - 3 1968 4 Residences 7 1969 2 Residences 4 1970. 1 Residence 6 1971 - 4 RECEIVED 1972 - 5 CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 1973 1 Residence 3 JUN1619.78 1974 - 4 AM PM 718191191111I211 121314151 1975 1 Residence 3 1976 1 Residence 5 1 8-Unit Apartment L. Rick Beeler Page two June 16, 1978 ADDITIONS, REMODELING NEW CONSTRUCTION & GARAGES 1977 4 Residences 4 1978 3 Residences - TOTAL 22 Residences 3 Apartments (21 Units) 69 • • RGN/mp cc: Planning Department EXHI T NO. 710 �-� ' ' ITEM NO.' - :72?_ hL� Ak z THE CITY OF RENTON z ,_._M ;r .. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 04? �� June 8, 1978 RECEIVED 235-2530 �T E0 "P'��� CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JLIN201978 • AM • PM Mr. William Graham 7,R,9,IO,11,I211.2i:�4415,fi 2286 W. 12th Avenue Vancouver, B.C. V6K 2N3 • RE: CEDARCREST, P.U.D. APPLICATION PPUD-172-78 (Job #6420) Dear Mr. Graham: The various municipal departments have reviewed the tentative P.U.G. plan for Cedarcrest and have the following comments: • 1. Utilizing the density calculations of the P.U.'G. Ordinance the maximum density for such' development, assuming a single family residential underlying zone, is 48 dwelling units. • We would be interested in further information aobut the incorporation of the pbwerline rights-of-way as part of the gross site area which you mentioned in your May 26, 1978, letter.• This wcuid have an effect on density, and would, more than likely, place the proposed 53 dwelling . unit maximum of Cedarcrest within an acceptable single family residential P. U.D. density. 2. We have geologic information that, indicates a possibility of unstable slopes on this site, together with mined-out coal beds. The slope on a majority of the site ranges from 25% to 35% and in certain areas up to 60%. More detailed information will be needed regarding, existing conditions and the proposed development. This will • include additional grading plans to indicate the extent of grading and assess the various impacts of such grading (proposed cut and fill ) . 3. The landscape plan indicates undisturbed existing natural areas. It appears from review of the site plan that larger areas between buildings, around the site perimeter, and within the existing drainage ravines can be retained. , Certain shifts in building and improvements may be necessary • to better achieve the preservation of the existing natural character of the site. No clearing and grading shall be permitted .un.til after preliminary P.U.G. approval . More detailed information will be necessary regarding preserva- tion areas, as well as the requirement to supplement these buffer areas and the areas cleared by development with additional trees and landscaping. Landscape plans will be required t•,i th the preliminary P. U. D. submittal : 0 •• r • • Mr. William Graham June 8, 1978 Page Two 4. Noise will be a factor due to the proximity of FAI-405. • Additional information will be necessary to demonstrate methods to be applied in mitigating the noise impacts on the develop- ment. (i .e. , additional and existing tree buffers, construc- tion techniques, setbacks, etc. ) • 5. You mention in your. May 26, 1978, letter additional traffic and parking information. This information will be necessary to assess the relative impacts of the development on the existing roadways in the area. • • 6. Fire Department may require an additional. emergency vehicle access only. This possibility should be reviewed. Also, fire hydrant and fire flow requirements shall meet Fire • Department requirements. • 7. The .existing natural drainage ravines must be preserved and . enhanced. This will require rearrangement of the single family lots along Renton Avenue South and the valley play area. The pedestrian system can be designed to utilize these natural areas provided any impacts are minimal . 8. Suitable drainage facilities will be necessary to..mitigate potential impacts of site alteration and increased runoff and erosion. These should be coordinated with the Engineer- ing Division, which has indicated the need for detailed plans. 9. A proposed declaration of environmental significance has been issued for the subject development. An environmental impact statement will be necessary unless • the additional information mentioned above is provided, together with proposed mitigating measures that if provided would reduce potential impacts to such an extent that a final negative declaration of environmental impact could be issued for the proposal . 10. Buildings #29-30 and #20-21 should be shifted a minimum of an additional 10 feet away from the highway right-of-way to provide adequate screening and buffering. • 11. Additional information regarding safe function of the steep • driveways into some of the downhill garages is needed. It appears that an unsafe backing uphill onto the primary circu- lation road will result if designed as proposed. 12. The. visitor parking area off the end of Cedar Avenue South should be redesigned or relocated to provide a more• aesthet- ically pleasing entrance and reduce impacts to the natural area in this portion of the project. 111, Mr. William Graham June 8, 1978 Page Three 13. Suitable utilities shall be provided for the project. The Utilities Division has noted the need for a short 8" water main extension to the south. This and other utilities require- ments must be coordinated with the Utilities Division. 14. The Engineering Division has indicated that off-site improve- ments are required along the portion of the site adjacent to Cedar Avenue South and Renton Avenue South. 15. Access into the site must be more specifically reviewed in terms of grade and site distance. How does the proposed access relate to the existing Cedar Crest access and the adjacent public right-of-way? Ye hope that the above information will be helpful to you in your plan- ning process for the proposed development. Once the additional informa- tion on environmental impact is provided and a final declaration issued, . you may apply for preliminary P.U.D. approval based on the above noted comments and the application requirements of the P.U.D. ordinance (Section 4-2710). If you have any further questions, please contact this department. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen Planning Director Michael L. Smith Associate Planner MLS:wr cc: Gene Farrell I-arstad Associates 0 THE CITY OF RENTON 2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 = °i CHARLES J. DEL AURENTI• MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT po �' 235-2550 0i.4 c0 � • • June 19, 1978 • Mr . William Graham 2286 W . 12th Avenue +. ancouver , B . C . V6K 2N3 PE : CEDARCREST , TENTATIVE P . U .D . Dear f•ir . Graham : • As per our meeting of June 14 , 1978 , regarding the above- mentioned subject , . ee• discussed the comments expressed in • our June 8 , 1978 , letter to you , and the subsequent procedures for Tentative P . U .D . approval and Preliminary P . U .D . appli- rat ion . As ue discussed at the meeting . the Tentative P .U .D . basically meets staff approval with the comments noted . Houever . ue do need the additional information discussed in items 2 through 5 of the June 8 . 1978 , letter in order to complete our environ- rmental threshold determination process pursuant to the State f:nvironrnental Policy Act . jlost of this information can be in the form of uritten clarification of the, project. as it relates to these items . Any environmental review during the Tentative P . U . D . phase will apply to the Preliminary P . U .D . application . We .are confident that this revieu can be completed expedi- tiously once ue have received the necessary information.. If you have any questions or need additional information , please ' contact this Department . Very truly yours , • Gordon Y . Erickson RECEIVE® Plar nine arec - r CITY OF RENTON . 7, / HEARING MOANER • l '1•.y201978 (?lichrael L . Smit. AM OM Associate Planner 7,81%%I0111'l2,1•213i4,5,6 ML`, : lh r r flee, F, r rr 1 l • Iril' tl :I�l An'mriat inn , !7 HIBI'T` NO. = • ITEM NO. - i 7Y- 7,e` • • . .� .77 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 20, 1978. TO: Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER FROM: Clint Morgan JUN 2 01978 AM PM 7,8,9,14,11,12,1,2,3,4,.5,E SUBJECT: File No. R-178-78; City of Renton Request for Rezone As per your memo of June 14, 1978, the following information and responses have been prepared. 1 . Analysis of existing traffic capacities and volumes on Mill Street at the access point to Renton Hill . (intersection of South 3rd Street at Mill and Houser Way South) The traffic signalized intersection of South 3rd Street at Mill and Houser Way South is the critical point of access to Renton Hill . Analysis of the total intersection capacity under existing conditions shows a capable increase of 36%. The estimated increase in the intersection traffic demand due to the R-3 zoning of 10.5 acres is 18.5%. It is, therefore, possible for the intersection to absorb the increased demand. A reapportionment of the controller splits would be the only required adjustment. However, because of short storage space between the intersection of South 3rd. Street at Main and South 3rd Street at Mill and Houser Way South, it would not be a desirable increase to absorb. We would have to take time from the eastbound heavy flow of traffic to increase the northbound time. 2. Analysis of the existing traffic capacities and volumes on Cedar Ave. South, Renton Ave. South, South 7th Street, South 9th Street, South 10th Street, and South llth Street. Can these streets and the aforementioned absorb additional traffic? If so, how much? The following list of locations are the 1978 recorded weekday traffic volumes (total 24-hour vehicle count) . a. Cedar Ave. South, south of South 3rd St. 511 b. Renton Ave. South, south of South 3rd St. 1 ,182 c. Grant Ave. South, south of South 7th St. 171 rr q�/ yr �(� r 11� T T C /I - / ' ('yam L a . ~ ® 0 Rick Beeler Page 2 June 20, 1978 Due to low traffic activity, the remaining locations mentioned above have not been counted for traffic volumes. The existing traffic volumes for Renton Hill for the streets listed above are low in comparison to what the streets can absorb with the one exception of Cedar Ave. South, which has on-street parking on both sides. Parking on both sides does restrict the free flow of two-way traffic. The right- a-way width and street width are substandard, measuring 40 feet and 27 feet respectively when they should measure 50 feet and 32 feet respectively. The traffic volume on Cedar Ave. South could increase to a total volume of 900 to 1000 vehicles per day and still function with parking on both sides depending on driver's tolerance to restricted flow. Any increase beyond this volume would probably necessitate restriction of the parking to one side so as to allow free flow of two-way traffic which would provide better emergency vehicle access and a more safe driving condition. According to past studies of R-3 zoning in similar conditions, a full development of 10.5 acres for low rise apartments would generate approx- imately 1350 vehicle trips per day. This would be enough to necessitate the restriction of parking on one side. Renton Ave. . has the same substandard conditions in regard to right-a-way and street width (26' ) but parking has already been restricted to one side. R-1 zoning with the proposed PUD. development would generate approximately 425 vehicle trips per day. This would probably allow traffic volumes to remain below the marginal conditions which would necessitate the restriction of parking on Cedar. 3. Analysis of the traffic capacities, circulation and volumes on these streets in 1963. Please provide what information you have regarding this. There are no traffic capacity records dating back to 1963. 4. What date was FAI-405 begun and completed? According to the information we have available, the 1-405 freeway was begun in 1963-64 and opened in 1967. 5. Analysis of alternative access to the subject properties in view of the existing R-3 zoning. What studies , if any, were done regarding the extension of Grant Avenue South? According to the records, four alternate routes were given preliminary consideration for access in 1972. They are as follows: Route A - This is a proposed straight connection between the two existing Grant Avenues. Rick Beeler Page 3 June 20, 1978 Route B - This is a proposed connection between Renton Ave. and Eagle Ridge Drive. Route C - This is a proposed connection between Cedar Ave. and 'Benson Road South Route D - This is a proposed connection from Mill Ave. South passing underneath the freeway 1-405 to South 4th Street Please refer to the attached sketch for exact location. After all routes were considered, Route A, which would provide a. straight connection between the two existing Grant Avenues seemed to be the most favored by the citizens committee formed at the time and Del Bennett, who represented the city. This route would provide mostly straight alignment, moderate grades and good connections to existing streets. Routes B and C, while being less desirable because of street grades, extensive fill or cuts or having a poor connection are feasible considerations. Route D, which passes underneath 1-405, was considered unfeasible because of low clearance and freeway columns interference with alignment location of right-a-way. The estimated cost of providing an alternate access in 1972 was $160,000. The cost probably would be considerably more now. Full development of the R-3 zoned area would add approximately 1350 vehicle trips per day to the Renton Hill area according to similar studies. Regardless of the type of zoning, the additional access route is recommended by this department. C E M:a d Attachment ?" . . t -...1 l..z1,..' 5 " 4 I! Ls-CF,':',..• _ . '' •"K-,,,;''',---41•2 ' 1. 1.---li r 1 : 4 '1 X-i•1 : • f , ''.v. ROUTE "A" Lew - 2500 Ft. Max. Grade - . •' z ,.; 1._.: . , . 4 4 ..., -1{..1 -; . .,,.. ' ...-' MOS... itraight alignment, moderate t; J1-1 5 4 ,,,•-i, - ,it, , .. .. 1 .:,, - .k•• , , -. . - , ,. t;lit -47.• ; .L-fTf-•-- grades, good connection to existing -„, .:. ',1 '' - lir, ': ''. 4 . '...,. : 1 1._, .....Orgt; ,zri-r-jr 1 7 A l; i '.., (7, 7 3 --.j.4.-eoe'Le ' A.-"' "Ti 1 ROUTE "B" Length - 1850 Ft. Max. Grade - 9% r , -- - 1 ? 1 '1111 It ' , Gently curving, fairly steep grades ir• „, E, ;: 2., ..!. .i tw ,r1 i- li, g ,, , . ::.: k.,`,:;„, it:-,-, --- --...--I r Vt. ., tv,ik..,- , tt> • ',--:', ', "5 •!: i '_• • throughout, disruption of valley t I,,v..! 1',. 9>• :: •14 : 0 ,; 0:' ', • .; :. )77:t; 41:',,N" el.'. •• s'' '4 '3 1: 44.: its). • area due to extensive filling. :Vp 4'. ,• ! 65-f.ffirq, i • ,? , ,r. . [....., , .-T,. 1 , „_ . • ,•, ....a _a. a. a t''f, • Li0J' '7,, ,_ i; i! 0 ...,i., - .1; Ik.1 ,‘, ,,.- 2-, . ROUTE "C" Length - 2500 Ft. Max. Grade - 9% II' .• •• A2-I ....° Ie.'lk ; 1.. •-..el-; „ •t.'-'0,._ ZI II ,41,: , -- \, --:-T---- '-• K..li...:-.% rrf 1! ''. it it;:111 4.‘ :••I'N" ,le,0•(1 1 i i i,! *• .-A. .-. " Fairly tight curves, major slope ,,, , 441'i 4 r;' ii i•-ii....R. I'i m(i' l •I' • ,: i , 1 ...‘. _ cutting required, somewhat poor 117.1 ' .. :- i 1 S - connection at Benson Road. 11, ,4r,, t 501;i. r., '1 ,rt. sif,...q, i ! t.,,'• T.: • ':,1 [... lir..!: [ 1.-_ ,1‘1;_.. •,,i . t. -- Ittl' -.4-, -.-- ‘, t....4 t_ ,. . r, . 1, . „- . :_4- : • 1 ••• ••77. .1: .r " .i r i .1., "'/ ',. : ... k- " 1 -I i-;- 1 -,.., <t .-'4 • i ; / / 1 c.' • , r • ' 'I `, t r L• . : •,.- - • . t 41 L . l . : I ' • .;.• : .:1 1 ,, , !,. 1 . L,,i . „T \ . - - r I 4'1 ii r".- I '• , 1.- ' ' s1 • I r 4 i . , .., • i., . . •, f----lr • -7 I • I i , IL-- ,• 2, to ; ‘• •• 0 b. I.11 ' L. - 1 / ;' .. :i , 1 , , , . ..: •• n ., „...•, . -,s • .-..1--..,, r..-t.:-.4 .. „___. . . , r-' •,4 • 9 : 3 • . " ' 4 I " 11 , 11, •... . A. ' ... .31 - G. ' / 7 • • y i t ' " t 1 i - ,---,..; . ;11 . • - • • . V i 4 t• 41 1 , • • ''-'' -,-1-- 01111.1.IP --: t,‘" • -• l \ 1 // 1.' • : . IL 'Y.' 1,r- ----1 -?-'-- ARNot.o 4 9-- . J/ . ••• •r•1 ' 4 VARY,. .' I 1 I"1. [ .4 . , • ; d.. do a ..o •1 4 .. ‘ ' . - C° ‘.. ‘02... • 9 IP • -- -• • „ F , I 1 .• • • - • - v(10 9 '' - - • -- .1•4t-..-'21 k. / • , . " to , is I'4. •d] • .- 4 1 , •• .... . .-. ."3ri"" . - • •'• s s " •• '.- \.. • -- keh L . •.' ) • . NI‘\"" "'• x i s ,0C-It.',..... , U . . .. .: - • \ ' / •i r , - ilL1 . --- •- ). ,. -' '',' il I ,,-,‘• J • ' El 1 0.7i(ma‘71k.L ito..t Pk. i•• n . ' • „ . '• 1 l• i..1 0 0 •. . 'N ' ! :••1 • ' .7 :••-•=.1 1 ck ex . • , , .!' • , s s , .. . . .. . .. 7.-.1 . . .... ... . . , ., . .\ \. cc .i (3, 101. ,, • ... kcAl - • ;•\.4' - '1 : i • . •••• .. Gtt. . : °•". 0. i • '.. . A \'*\\,, .. \\0 IAA I- , i I, - • • . ___ __., - _ _ ___ ___ __ __ . 77(------. ..: ,•,. :•., .• . 4 f r\ , \ /4( •• 1 ' t ••• ' -- ••j • •....\\. V/ . •. 11\i..--t0. 13 .3,01*3711.17;11.1171.3d..1 1...7. - - -- •' •-'s • --.1.---.."••••".."-'1 :11' T“to*.i , • *A i .... j / • cl. ki.•' Sir---. , , 1 •. \ .• ii•I •,..(: T, :,'? 1'2t ,011:tilti, '' / \,1 . /1 , 9,06# 1 • • . • .12 II ., ', • • lk‘j•'..1 '. .f.'.f j/ - ' .,. / P . •, io .. is es to , t.„ .. .. ..e 42--. •••'••"%4 1 :,' 1 '.1-:...-' -,..]'- / • \°.\ . .. 0 ,,J 1]..7 1_ .r. il \ . •, , _ _,,.. ",,,,,, :- • 1 •• „•,,, . . ,• " '.1.,_':„.;,„ 0 ..2a,„-;, . !,_ • ,i ....,,: c..c ....,,-.,.. ./... .. , -...• ..,' / ' •• 1.-.. ,. „,..., . , ,c.sgf--/ ,,..,.-:. . •:..1:ri.i--,/7 • _,,. \ ' .. • I" ,.t• .., .,... .. .!-_,.,..., • -•,,,,•...-. ' y`1.7,,.. ' ',4z.--,)., 4',. '.„ • )4 / I , .-..-- - --..- \\,. .-“,\•. C• .. '- / .. • 0 ...rs.Ne• •..A 'L-1.-.- • ' L-----5, A: I u- .7.,.. 11. . ...-":"...:. .. • •,•:.1 4 i 4-•ON:?\ ,_ , r : 114 . Immo:,../.1440.4.t.1 ei :--- ,_, 7., • ' -[- . L...‘-::-7: "'''` ''''' • •,.. • .- ,,,,••• -I, i ,_ (,"4, ,,..,„.... , 7x,„•,..4,, • " ... ' ' ra"' t "A.:'-‘.7.---4.k' ,4 civ,< Y‘ €0.11--. ; of • , i r s*, * Q , Y.': : b• .et,,,, •.0 n''i' ..... ...:••:: g -- li '7.- T. ..)- •"'‘':'",,' • cr.,,..“- ",„ + ..• • - e ( , #'.' ' . L • • . It ••• :/ • I.. ,de• ._. • / 05 i ..• •„41. . 't• si • .4° ‘• . „. • "/0. it a.0 • le 7 s ,1147. :0' '. , h . •.. .;.-[,,_ •.!... .. \i •. . , 60 1). P • .• • • . " . \t\. • "• '' 4iiitiore.m...earawsito. -• ) . , • I Grk i i t a I 1 L I )\:. F'RED •••IE•-t- C)''.1 ,, \ ••,, •.... JR H\ ''. \ • il'I . I 1 . • RECEM.(S CITY OF a aT'r;'LUN litt,R1NG 4 NER JUN 2 1`i78 PM 1 AM `j�416,fi. . 71819110 J111.11 1.,1.. 2 A 3 ITIVI NO. • 5 IN PROCEEDINGS BEFORE L. RICK. BEELER, HEARING EXAMINER 6 In Re ) File No. R-178-78 7 'CITY OF RENTON REZONE ) 8 APPLICATION ) MEMORANDUM BY KENTOw _.LOLLY. -Co InefhtsanN ASSOCIATION. IN S%LPP_ORX--•_;OF THE CITY OF 9 ) RENTON'S APPLICATION FOR 10 ) REZONE FROM R-3 to R-1 11 . THE RENTON HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION respectfully submits 12 the following memorandum in support of the application of the 13 City of. Renton to downzone certain properties located on Renton 14, Hill. 15 MEMORANDUM OF AUTHORITIES. 16 I. AMENDMENT OF ZONING REGULATIONS - STANDARDS. 17 ARBITRARY & CAPRICIOUS CONDUCT/APPEARNESS OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE. 18 The Transamerica Development Company ("TADCO") has challenged ig the actions taken by the City of Renton Planning Commission and 20 City Council, in changing the Comprehensive Plan as being violative 21 of the "Appearness of Fairness" Doctrine and constituting arbi- 22 trary and capricious conduct by the City. While those issues are 23 not now before the Hearing Examiner for review, the issue has 24 been raised and some response is warranted. 25 The City of Renton has the discretionary Fower to enact such 26 zoning regulations .as it deems appropriate to govern or regulate 27 the growth and development of this city. As a general proposition 28, the enactment of a zoning ordinance by a city council is a dis- 29 cretionary exercise of police power by the legislative authority 30 of a city and will not be reviewed by the Courts except for a :51 manifest abuse of such discretion, usually characterized as 32 "arbitrary and capricious" conduct. Usually numerous decisions' Memo._ by Renton Hill Community GOUGE.MCDETH&FAULL Association in Support of City P.O.Box 20 of Renton Applicationfor Rezone RENTON.AL 5-5OTON DBOES AL -6600 Page 1 • 1 have been delivered by our Courts in which the arbitrary and 2 capricious standard has been discussed. 3 A concise statement of the law concerning a challenge to a 4 zoning action taken by a municipality was given in State ex rel 5 Myhre v. City of Spokane, 70 Wn. 2d. 207, 210, 422 P. 2d 270 (1967) 6. as follows: 7 "(1) Zoning is a discretionary exercise of police power by a legislative authority. Lillions v. Gibbs, 47 Wn. 8 2d 269, 289 P. 2d 203 (1955) . Courts will not review, ex- cept for manifest abuse, the exercise of legislative dis- 9 cretion. State ex rel. Smilanich v. McCollum, 62 Wn. 2d 602, 384 P. 2d 358 (1963) . Manifest abuse of discretion 10 involves arbitrary and capricious conduct. Such conduct 11 is defined to be without consideration and in disregard of the facts. State ex rel. Lopez-Pacheco v.. Jones, 66 Wn. 2d 199, 401 P. 2d 841 (1965) ; State ex rel. Cosmopolis Consol. • 12 School Dist. No. 99 v. Bruno, 61 Wn. 2d 461, 13 378 P. 2d 691 (1963) . One who asserts that a public authority has abused its discretion and is guilty of arbi- trary, capricious, and.unreasoning conduct has the burden. 14 of proof. . State ex rel. Lopez-Pacheco v. Jones, supra; 15 State ex rel. Longview Fire Fighters Union, Local 828, vs. Longview, 65 Wn. 2d 568, 399 P. 2d 1 (1965) . If the validity 16 of the legislative authority's classification for zoning purposes is fairly debatable, it will be sustained. 17 Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. , 272 U.S. .365, 71 L. Ed. 303, 47 Sup. Ct. 114, 54 A.L.R. 1016 (1926) . " 18 In Sharninghouse v. City of Bellingham, 4 Wn. App. 198, 201 - 19 480 P. 2d 233 (1971) , the Court discussed the arbitrary and 20• capricious standard as follows: 21 "Arbitrary and. capricious' action of administrative bodies 22 means willful and unreasoning action, without consideration and in disregard of facts or circumstances. Where there is 23 room for two opinions, action is not arbitrary or capricious when exercised honestly and upon due consideration, even 24 though it may be believed that an erroneous conclusion has been reached, In re Buffelen Lbr. & Mfg. Co. , 32 Wn. 25 (2d) 205, 208, 201 P. (2d) 194 (1948) , and case cited. 26 Accord, State ex rel. Myhre v. Spokane, supra; Burnham v. Board of Appeals of Gloucester, 333 Mass: 114, 128 N.E. 2d 27. 722 (1955) . " 28 In addition to the arbitrary and capricious standard discussed 29, above, the City must also satisfy an "appearness of fairness" 30 standard which also has been discussed in numerous Court decisions. 31 In West Slope Community Council v. City of Tacoma, 18 Wn. App. 32 328, 335 (1977) . The Court discussed the appearness of doctrine Memo. by Renton Hill Comm. Assn GOUGE.MCBETH Be FAULL etc. , B.0.B0X 20 RINTON.WASHINGTON 08055 Page 2 AL B-56O0 1 as follows: 2 The appearance of fairness doctrine, which has been 3 developed to assure the highest public confidence in the governmental processes which result in zoning 4 changes and land planning measures, is invoked to invalidate a decision when a member of the deciding 5 body has an interest which might have substantially influenced his individual vote even if that interest 6 did not actually affect him. Narrowsview Preservation Assn. v. Tacoma, 84 Wn. 2d 416, 526 P. 2d 897 (1974) . 7 The appropriate test is whether a 8 disinterested person, having been apprised of the totality of a board member's personal in-, g terest in a matter being acted upon, [would] be reasonably justified in thinking that partiality 10 may exist? 11 Swift v. Island County, 87 Wn. 2d 348, 361, 552 P. 2d 175 (1976) . See also Buell v. Bremerton, 80 Wn. 2d 12 518, 495 P. 2d 1358 (1972) ; see generally 1 'R. Anderson, American Law of Zoning §§ 4.18-4.20 (2d ed. 1976) ; 13 Annot. , 10 A.L.R. 3d 694 (1966) . 14 In that case, the appearness of fairness issue arose when 15 City Councilman Warnick voted to approve the rezone request. 16 Councilman Warnick owned Puget Sound Manufacturing Company, a 17 cabinet making business, which had on occasion done work for a 18 general contractor who had done work for the developer on competi- 19 tive bid. The Court held that this potential conflict of interest 20 was too remote to violate the appearness of fairness doctrine. 21 In SAVE v. City of Bothell, 89 Wn 2d 862 (1978) , the Court 22 was asked to overturn a rezone approval in which two persons 23 'closely connected with the Bothell Chamber of Commerce, an active 24 participant in the rezone hearings, participated in the Planning 25 Commission hearings and voted on the rezone. The Court held that 26 the participation of the two individuals, one the executive 27 director of the Chamber, and the other a member of the Chamber 28 Board of Directors, violated the appearness of fairness doctrine, 29 stating as follows: 30 The test to be applied was stated in Swift v. Island County, 31 87 Wn. 2d 348, 552 P. 2d 175 (1976) . 32 Memo. by Renton Hill Comm. Ass'n etc. , GOUGE. McBETH&FAULL Page 3 P.O.BOX CO R6NTON.WASHINGTON 98088 AL.5.5600 1 The question to be asked is this: Would a disinterested 2 person, having been apprised of the totality of a board member's personal interest in a matter. being 3 acted upon, be reasonably justified in thinking that partiality may exist? If answered in, the affirmative, 4 such deliberations, and any course of conduct reached thereon, should be voided. 5 Swift v. Island County, supra at 361. We find that a disin- 6 terested observer would be justified in thinking partiality might 7 exist. 8 Under the standards set forth in these cases, we do not feel 9 that the City of Renton would be acting in an arbitrary or capri- 10 cious manner if this rezone were approved or that the appearness 11 of fairness doctrine has in any way been violated by any pro- 12 ceedings that have occurred to date. 13 14 II. SPOT ZONING 15 TADCO has also alleged that this rezone application, if 16 approved, would constitute illegal spot zoning. That issue has 17 been before the Court many times. In an oft-cited case, Smith v. 18_ Skagit County, 75 Wn. 2d 715, 743-45 (1969) is illustrative of 19 these cases. In Smith, Skagit County approved the rezone of 470 20 acres of land on Guemes Island from residential zoning to heavy 21 industry. The Court discussed the problem of spot zoning at 22 length, stating as follows: 23 Along with the failure to conduct the public hearings 24 fairly, both in substance and appearance, we are convinced that the rezoning constitutes a flagrant case of illegal 25 spot zoning. Spot zoning has come to mean arbitrary and unreasonable zoning action by which a smaller area is 26 singled out of a larger area or district and specially zoned for a use classification totally different from 27 and inconsistent with the classification of surrounding land, and not in accordance with the comprehensive plan.. 28 Spot zoning is a zoning for private gain designed to favor or benefit a particular individual or group and 29 not the welfare of the community as a whole. See C. Rhyne, Municipal Law §32-3, at 825 (1957) . The vice of a spot 30 zone is its inevitable effect of granting.,a discrimina- tory benefit to one or a group of owners and to the detri- 31 ment of their neighbors or the community without adequate public advantage or justification. Thomas v. Town of 32 Bedford, 11 N.Y. 2d 428, 184 N.E. 2d 285 (1962) . Zoning merely for the benefit of one or a few, or for the Memo. by Renton Hill Comm. Ass'n GOUGE.MCBETH&RAULI. P.O.SOX Qa etc. ' Page 4 RINTON.WASHINGTON 98055 AL 5.5600 • 1 disadvantage of some and with no substantial relationship 2 to the public health, safety, general welfare or morals, in conflict with either the comprehensive zoning plan 3 or ordinance is arbitrary and capricious and unlawful. Eckes v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore Cy. , 209 4 Md. 432, 121 A.2d 249 (1956) . Therefore, it is univerally held that a spot zoning ordinance which singles out a parcel of land within the 5 limits of a use district, and marks it off into a 6 separate district for the benefit of the owner, and per- mits the use of that parcel inconsistent with the use allowed in the rest of the district, is invalid if it is 7 not in accordance with the comprehensive plan and is 8 merely for private gain. Cassel v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 195 Md. 348, 73 A. 2d 486 (1950) . 9 The foregoing principles, it appears, forbid this amendment 10 to the zoning resolution and reveal it as an illegal spot zoning. Since size of the rezoned area must be considered 11 in relation to the size of the whole district affected (Mathis v. Hannan, supra) , we must relate the approximately 12 470 acres zoned for heavy industry to the entire island of about 5,500 acres zoned residential-recreational. When, 13 with no change whatever in circumstances and conditions, and after about 5 years of intensive study and numerous 14 hearings, Guemes had been zoned residential-recreational, the aluminum company's undertaking to buy the property 15 for the site of its reduction plant constituted no change of conditions adequate in law to support the rezoning. 16 With an abundance of sites still available in areas zoned industrial, the fact that the aluminum company preferred 17 Guemes Island to all others and insisted upon having it shows that the rezoning under attack here was for the 18 peculiar benefit of the aluminum company, and detrimental to the neighboring owners and the general welfare. To meet 19 the company's demands, we think, was unreasonable, arbi- trary and capricious, and, therefore, illegal. 20 These standards were approved in Buell v. City of Bremerton, 21 80 Wn. 2d 518 (1972) . Under these standards, this rezone can- 22 not be considered an illegal "spot zoning". The size of the 23 rezone area must be considered in relation to the size of the 24 whole district affected. The total area affected by this applica- 25 tion is Renton Hill, and only Renton Hill. Within that area, 26 the subject property is not unduly singled out and restricted 27 in use as compared to other uses permitted on Renton Hill. TADCO ?8 has attempted to expand the area of concern beyond Renton Hill s 29 boundaries in an attempt to buttress its argument that this 30 action constitutes spot zoning, but that position should be 31 rejected. Renton Hill is now, and has for some time been, an 32 identifiable community and this rezone should be evaluated with Memo. by .Renton Hill Comm. Assn GOUGE. aFAUu P. O.BOX xe etc. , RENTON.WASHINGTON 98O56 Page 5 AL 5-56OO • 1 its geographical boundaries in mind. If that is done, no spot 2 zoning exists in this case 3 4 III. REZONE - CONDITIONS/STANDARDS 5 When a City Council acts to amend or change conditions 6 existing under established zoning laws, additional considerations 7 come into play. Before deciding to amend its zoning ordinance, a 8 city must weigh benefits which flow to the public generally 9 against the detriment, if any, to adjacent or otherwise affected 10 property owners or to the public which might result from such a 11 change. Several cases have discussed the factors which must be 12 taken into consideration in evaluating rezone applications. 13' In Parkridge v. City of Seattle, 89 Wn. 2d 454 (1978) the 14 Court stated: 15. "In considering ,the evidence, we note that (1) there 16 is no presumption of validity favoring the action_of rezoning; (2) the proponents of the rezone have the 17 burden of proof in demonstrating that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning, or as 18 in. this case, the 1959 amendment thereto; and (3) the rezone must bear a substantial relationship to the 19 ` public health, safety, morals or welfare." 20. We acknowledge these standards and feel we have met the re- 21 quirements they have placed upon us. In determining whether 22 these standards have been met, the following cases should be 23 considered: 24 In Carlson v. City of Bellevue, 72 Wn. 2d 41, 51, 435 P. 2d 25 957 (1968) , the State Supreme Court set out the factors to be con- 26 sidered in evaluating a rezone application: 27 In determining whether or not a zoning ordinance is 28 reasonable in its application to a given parcel of land, among the factors to be taken into consideration are the 29 character of the neighborhood, existing uses and zoning of nearby property, the amount by which property. values 30 are decreased, the extent to which the diminution of values promotes the public health, safety, morals or 31 welfare, the relative gain to the public as compared with the hardship imposed upon the individual owner, the suitability of the subject property for the purpose for. which it is zoned, and the length of time the g property has remained unimproved, considered in the context of the Memo. by Renton Hill Comm. Ass'n GOUGE.McBETH&FAULL etc. P.O. AG MINTON.WASHINGTON D80E6 Page 6 AL 5.5800 1 land development in the area. No single factor is con- trolling but each must receive due consideration. But 2 to sustain an attack upon the validity of a zoning ordi- , 3 nance, an aggrieved property owner must show that if the ordinance is enforced the consequent restrictions on his 4 property preclude its use for any purpose to which it is reasonably adapted. He is required to show that there is 8 no possibility for profitable use under the restrictions of the ordinance, or alternatively that the greater part of the value of the property is destroyed by it, although 6 there may be some slight use remaining. Adaptability, 7 it has been declared, envisages economic as well as functional use, and assumes, not the most profitable use, 8 but that some permitted use can be profitable. 9 We feel that the evidence clearly establishes a change in 10 conditions that has occurred since the original zoning in 1963 11 and that the rezone does bear a substantial relationship to the 12 public health, safety, morals and welfare. 13 14 IV. DUTY TO CHANGE ZONING REGULATIONS ON CHANGE IN CONDITIONS 15 Although zoning implies a degree of permanency, the City is 16 under a duty, when conditions relating to a zoned area have so 17 clearly changed as to emphatically call for revisions in zoning, 18 to initiate proceedings and consider the necessity of pertinent 19• modifications of their zoning ordinances. In Bishop v. Town of 20 Houghton, 69 Wn. 2d 786, 792, 420, P. 2d (1966) , this concept was 21 ' expressed as follows: 22. " [1] We have no quarrel with respondents' basic theme 23 to the effect that while zoning implies a degree of perma- nency, it is not static and zoning authorities cannot 24 blind themselves to changing conditions. Thus, when conditions surrounding or in relation to a zoned area have 25 so clearly changed as to emphatically call for revisions in zoning, the appropriate zoning authorities are under 26 a duty to initiate proceedings and consider the necessity of pertinent modifications of their zoning ordinances. 27 Otherwise, outmoded zoning regulations can become un- reasonable, and the zoning authorities' failure to 28 suitably amend or modify their ordinances can become arbi- trary, in which event Courts can and should grant appro- 29 priate relief. 2 Metzenbaum, Zoning 1125 (2d ed. 1955) ." 30 This same idea was expressed in Farrell v. City of Seattle, supra, 31 as follows: 32 Memo. by Renton Hill Comm. Ass'n etc. , GOUGE.McBETH&FAULL Page 7 !.O.BOX i8 RENTON.WABHINOTON 98055 AL 8. 8O0 1 " [2] We also recognize that, although zoning implies a degree of permanency, municipal authorities must be re- 2 sponsive to changing conditions and circumstances which 3 justify revision of existing zoning classifications. Otherwise, the outdated land use restrictions may become a unreasonable, and refusal to amend or modify zoning ordi- nances could result in arbitrary and unreasonable 5 conduct. Bishop v. Town of Houghton, 69 Wn. 2d 786, 420 P. 2d 368 (1966) . Although courts are not empowered 6 to amend zoning ordinances, or rezone a particular property, they may grant appropriate relief and declare the action 7 of thezoning authorities invalid, upon a showing of un- reasonable and arbitrary zoning action or inaction. 8 Bishop v. Town of Houghton, supra; McNaughton V. Boeing, 68 Wn. 2d 659, 414 P. 2d 778 (1966) ." 9 This statement was quoted verbatim in Mayer Built Homes, Inc. , 10' v. The Town of Steilacoom, 17 Wn App 558 (1977) . In that case, 11 the Plaintiff's property was affected by an ordinance removing 12 "apartment houses" as a permitted use in an existing zoning 13 classification and by a later change in classification to one 14 which did not permit apartments. In separate actions, the 15 Plaintiff developer challenged the validity of the later change 16 and sought the issuance of a building permit for an apartment 17 house. The developer argued that the city acted arbitrarily and 18 capriciously in rezoning his property and that the act so re- 19 duced its value as to amount to an unconstitutional confiscation 20 of.his property. The Court's op inion in full is attached to 21 this Memorandum for your review. The statement set forth above 22. in Carlson was quoted verbatim in Mayer with approval. Suffice 23 it to say, the Court held the City's action to be y proper under 24 the circumstances existing in that case. 25 These concepts were also discussed by the Court in Fleming v. 26 City of Tacoma, 81 Wn. 2d 292, 295, 502 P. 2d 327 (1972) as follows: 27 " [] ] We have long passed the time when one may use his 28 land as he wishes provided. it creates no nuisance. The con- centration of population and the infinite variety of modern 29 land uses necessitate effective land use planning. The restrictions on use, inherent in zoning, insure that if one 30 uses his property in a way harmonious with the existing zoning codes, he will be free from the danger that the 31 future use of his neighbor's land might be detrimental to or foreclose his own established use. Decisions which 32 amend or change conditions under existing zoning laws Memo. by Renton Hill Comm. Ass'n etc. , GOUGE.MCBETH&FAULL Page 8 P.O.00%86 RENTON.WASHINOTON 9BO166 AL 6-E600 1 therefore require an extremely sensitive balance between individual rights and the public welfare." 2 3 When all factors are considered, we feel that a change in 4 circumstances has occurred, that a change in zoning is now re- 5 quired and should be ordered. 6 7 V. SUMMARY 8 The Renton Planning Commission and Renton City Council have 9 .before tham a request from residents on Renton Hill to make such 10 changes in our existing Comprehensive Land-Use Plan and Zoning 11 Ordinances so as to remove "apartment houses" as p permitted uses 12 on Renton Hill. There is no question that the City has the 13 power to make such changes if they feel such changes are now 14 appropriate. We contend that circumstances have changed since 15 those ordinances were adopted and that the City now has an affirma- 16 tive duty to change both the Comprehensive Land-use Plan and Zoning 17 Ordinance to meet this new situation. The developers contention 18 that this change would result in economic ruin or would amount to -- 19 an unconstitutional taking of his property is without merit. No 20 vested rights exist until an application for a building permit is 21 filed, and that has not been done in this case. The Council and 22' the Planning Commission must consider the factors set forth in 23 the Mayer Built Homes case, and we feel confident that such review 24 will result in affirmative action by the City to make the changes 25 requested. 26 Respectfully submitted • 27 28 29 R B E. mble4e- Attorney at Law 30 31 32 Memo. b Y Renton Hill Comm, Ass'n etc. , Page 9 GOUGE. McBETH&FAULL p.o..ox aS RENTON.WAOHINOTON 06055 AL B-�6OO 558 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 • . - May 1977 - MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM - 559 [No. 1782-2. Division Two. May 11, 1977.] . MAYER BUILT HOMES, INC., Appellant, v. THE TOWN Edwin Wheeler and Hutchins, Plumb & Wheeler, for • OF STEILACOOM, ET AL, Respondents. respondents. [11 Zoning — Judicial Review — Arbitrary and Capricious REED, J.—Mayer -Built Homes, Inc., (Mayer) appeals Action — Determination. A party asserting that a zoning action from a superior court dismissal of petitions (1) seeking is arbitrary and capricious has the burden of proving it was taken review of the Town of Steilacoom's adoption of a new zon- without consideration and in disregard of facts and circumstances. A zoning action is not invalid merely because it prevents the most .ing classification encompassing property owned by Mayer, profitable use of property or because a different action seems pref- .and (2) seeking to compel the town to issue a permit for enable to the court. - construction of an apartment on the property. On appeal, Zoning— Validity-- Confiscation — What Constitutes. The . .Mayer contends that the town acted arbitrarily and capri- burden of showing such a diminution of property value resulting . . ; ciously in rezoning the subject property and that the act so from zoning as to amount to a confiscation is on the person asserting • reduced its value as to amount to an unconstitutional con- it. A reduction in the value of a particular property is justified by benefit to the public so long as some profitable use of the property fiscation. In addition, Mayer challenges the legality of an remains. ordinance passed prior to the new zoning enactment, which removed from the zoning district certain uses then applica- [3] Zoning — Retroactivity - Vested Rights. A landowner does _ ble to the property. We affirm for the reasons set forth not acquire rights under existing regulations until application is• below'. made for a building permit, after which a change in the permitted uses does not affect him. In 1962 the Town of Steilacoom adopted a comprehen- sive plan for its future growth. It established various zoning Nature of Action: The plaintiff's property was affected classifications and assigned most of the property within the by an ordinance removing "apartment houses" as a permit- • corporate limits to a "low density residential" classification, ted use in an existing zoning classification and by a later the most restrictive then available. In 1963 Mayer acquired change in classification to one which did not permit apart- two parcels so classified. These lay unimproved until 1967, ment houses. In separate actions, the plaintiff challenged when both were rezoned "retail," a class which allowed cer- bq validity of the later change and sought the issuance of a tarn commercial uses and apartment houses. Mayer then Iding permit for an apartment house. built an apartment house on the larger of its two parcels, Superior Court: The plaintiff's actions were dismissed '' property not at issue herein. The smaller parcel,the subject by the Superior Court for Pierce County, Nos.. 225146, of this appeal, remained unimproved without any building • 229671, Horace G. Geer, J., on February 28, 1975, permits having been sought for.it. Then on June 12, 1973, Court of Appeals: • the Town adopted ordinance No. 475, which in part pro- hibited the construction of any "duplex or multi-family :ng actions in question not to have been arbitrary and capricious or confiscatory and not to constitute improper dwelling" in the retail use district in which the parcel lay. Mayer did no, challenge this ordinance at the time. interim zoning or an invalid retroactive application of a Early in 1974, the town planner petitioned for adoptionzoning enactment. The trial court's dismissal is affirmed. of ordinance No. 496, which was designed to set up a new 'Norman L. Martin, for appellant. , zoning classification of "neighborhood commercial' to allow areas of transition between existing commercial uses of • property and the residential neighborhoods that had grown May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v. STEILACOOM 561 560 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM —May 1977 - - 55,500 to $.10,599 as "retail-. versus Fi-4,5Uii to ••:•,,.J,re ui,cili up nearby. Among the uses allowed in a neighborhood - proposed neighborhood commercial usage. He agreed that commercial zone are single—family homes and duplexes, multi—family residential development was the highest and professional and business offices,. public and semi—public • ill uses, barber and beauty shops, travel bureaus, and "spe- • best use, hut seemed ci assume that. such usage .ui, still cialty stores" dealing in antiques, books, food, flowers, gifts; permitted in the retaildistrict. The council continued the andphotography. Desi�^ed to reduce-the ordinary meeting to allo«• study of the reports, ;and upon reconven- jewelryg ing on May 21, 1974, it affirmed assignment of Mayer's- commercial impact of these uses were such features as property into the neighborhood commercial classification. restrictions on building height and sign size, a requirement [1] We consider first Mayer's argument that the town for side yards, a limitation on number of employees, and a council's rezoning of his property must be voided due..to its --,uirement for advance approval of proposed building arbitrary and capricious nature. A zoning act is subject to ns. Mayer's property was among those sites subject to �,: judicial review only for manifest abuse of discretion. The . - rezone under this ordinance. party asserting that a legislative authority has abused. its The line matter Went first before the town planning commis-. discretion b, acting arbitrarily and capriciously, i.e., with- •siori in public public hearing on February 11, 1974' attended by out consideration and in disregard of the facts, has the Mi:-'er `= president and s.veral 1 eople living near Mayer's burden c:f proof; ist the ze^•^a classification is fa,,.- (:._ pro erty The town planner, arke explained will • f F DennisDe;.r.:s , e�: l;.i ,. that - able, it be sustained. �ic'c ex ref. Myhre v. Sp.ot•cr;c, the proposed creation of a new zeo;ag classification was to *' q 7 42•� li. fit; �. r..�d '_'u�. , k..� F.'�d 790 (19G�)- A mu?; c:•'s ;.•-' satisfy the policy of the comprehensive plan, i.e., that corn- should ) with 7.0;:_:n=T, action �.,...1.., be reviewed the following pat.ibla land uses should be combined and separated from7.- i approach r mind, asadopted+ n � �i S; I::U..,11 I^. ,,,_ , c.l.� i fed in CQT'iJC)Z L'. Ii' ('i .:f', , •nonromp tihie ;Isis by buffer strips, transitional uses, and `,- ,),� t1 51. �..; 1) n ! 957 (1935 : t devices. Asthingst he2? existed, i?. u i 4.:+J :LJi ). • other, similar vi s. e there was rid In determining whether or not a zoning ('rd - ee way .residential areas from the noise, traffic and is reasonable in its application to a j;:�'ei? parcel• tobuffer •(.' is::d other characteristics of retail use. After hearing comments among h rtaken on'=d 'r �i",.0. f, t: factors to be into consideration are from members of the audience. many fa_,c,er the .n:,-)_;, r' O :-`.;_ ._ . of whom were con- the e-1c: . v l_i 1.uo.I:U d. c':ill.. . 1[i,,_ 'err,ed about the.adverse effect re !II' .zoning of ne arb property,y the amount by which pre?- •er e of t I use would have on .-„ � I , i it nearby homes, the1 r•-a 1. e s area cr d, the e atent to which the chin- : planning commission unanimously e `= on `s ` 'c` � t :!' � a ` �' caution of values jJ:luia;,t.S the jJ::!; :C-health, safety, recommended adoption of the new classification ion and -morals ^lf, _ th e1 t• /, ,,e ;a �, welfare,f., the r 1... :�(. �.I:i, to i,.� public as 'assignment to it of four parcel. including Mayer's.er's. On May compared �:'I;l? the hardship lI'.:l).^.S^ri upon I;?.> ITI;-1:- 7, 1974, the town council conducted a public. hearing to •,1 •al the suitability the 5:'_' '�C� Jrcper';' for F vi u o.,,er, of j: , j consider adoption of the neighborhood commercial zoning the purpose for which it IS zoned, and tree i'.•;l�',i'. o: ordinance. 'The council heard Mayer's.posrt-ton and those of time the property jigs remained li:::i??1'=ovc'_j. ('easi;'_- ,z •ered in the ca-ntext of 'Inc land ueve;ufinent 'r thi.' the town. plainer,and objecting neighbors of the property. must. 4 .L1 tf >J • t^ , are:. No singe fact is contro °•'t but. each Mayer submitted ted two report on the financial effect- the • due- c:,,..�.'.1Cr .io D,.. to eusta`,1 a:: receive rezone would have on its property. An appraise: opined u"e-' •1' validity '' a --n•.;'g a-'ina"r aggrieved andthe property tl?at file highest -best use of property. owner c .^.` iftheordinance ;'' was for m Is` '?oc: that' or':_:�^cc ,; apartments, 1enforced the c'nse Ic nt restrictions on his property - iI? which case it was worth th $12,000; this he co:it.ra sted with a value-of-$5,500 under neighborhood corn- • - me`re;ial usage. A real estate broker valued the.property at 562 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM 563 preclude its use for any purpose to which it is reason- ably adapted. He is required to show that there is no intersecting the property, and the need to control traffic possibility for profitable use under the restrictions of and noise in the. area. In addition, we have already noted the ordinance, or alternatively that the greater part of that manyneigh the value of the property is destroyed by it, althoughbors voiced their fears that permitting retail uses would bring more people into the area, with there may be some slight use remaining. Adaptability, it has been declared, envisages economic as well as attendant traffic congestion and noise; many, in fact, functional use, and assumes not the most profitable favored a rezone of the site to a purely residential classifi- use, but that some permitted use can be profitable. cation, without even the sedate business activities contem (Footnotes omitted.) 8 E. McQuillin, Municipal Corpora- plated under "neighborhood commercial." The town council `ions 25.45, at 111 (3d ed. rev. 1976). proceedings of necessity followed an informal format, lack- We agree with the trial court that Mayer failed in its ` ing the niceties of courtroom evidentiary procedures so.that ourden of proving the ordinance was adopted arbitrarily `z- the interested citizens and capriciously. Mayer relies heavily on the opinions as to could express their views. The zoning decision, therefore, was based on opinion and speculation as reduction in value presented to the council, which allegedly to the future of the area and the need to establish the sub- demonstrate that the rezone would preclude use of the ject property as a transitional area according to the coin- property for "any useful purpose to which it is reasonably prehensive plan. With the trial court, we agree it would adapted." There are, however, certain deficiencies associ- have been preferable for the town council to have based its ated with reliance on the opinion letters. Neither letter decision on a more factual basis. We believe, nevertheless, compared the property's value if used for purposes allowed that the zoning ordinance has support under neighborhood commercial zoning with usespermitted in the record and is not a "wilful and unreasoning action, in disregard of facts under the current retail classification. Instead, both worked and circumstances." Northern Pac. Transp. Co. v. from the premise that the highest and best use would be for Washington apartments, and compared that value of the property with 'f 6>aslzznb on. Ut Transp. Comm'n, 69 E:'n.2d 472, 478, P P Y 418 P.2d 735 (1966). Where there is room for two opinions, its value if zoned neighborhood commercial; this approach a zoning action is not arbitrary and capricious when e er- ignored the fact that apartments were no longer permitted cised honestly and upon due consideration, even though a der the retail classification, and that the council was different conclusion might have been reached. Bishop v. ' ` ing asked to consider an alleged devaluation of the prop- ' , Houghton, 69 Wn.2d 78u 420 P.2dc erty if changed from uses permitted under "retail" to those , next 368 (1966). possible under "neighborhood commercial." In addition, �a e turn to the allegedly confiscatory application of T + the zoning ordinance to Mayer's s property. Mayer relies neither letter explained the method of valuation employed upon Hauser v. Arness, 44 Wn.2d 358, 267 P.2d 691 (1954), in arriving at the stated figures, and one author expressly which contains language disclaimed any status as a competent appraisers supportive of property rights, such as the following at page 369: The trial court characterized the case in support of a Zoning laws that result in relatively little gain or benefit rezone as "skinny." It consisted primarily of the town to the public while inflicting serious injury or loss on the planner's dissertations on a purpose of the comprehensive property owner have always been held by this court to be plan to impose buffer zones between commercial and resi- . confiscatory and void. de ttial activities, the progression of the area to a residen- Mayer argues that the opinion letters show a severe reduc-tial neighborhood, the projected future for the roads tion in value, that the public would gain little from the rezone, and that the action amounts to a confiscation. . s 564 MAYER BUILT HOMES v. STEILACOOM May 1977 May 1977 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM 565 [2] We have noted the failure of the opinion letters to • Section 1 of ordinance No. 475 provides: competently demonstrate that the rezone from. "retail" to The intent of this ordinance is to establish certain "neighborhood commercial" would diminish the property's interim zoning modifications in the zoning code of the Value. While we agree there. must be some benefit to the Town pending the adoption of'a new comprehensive plan public before a zoning decision will be allowed to diminish and new zoning ordinance, and to prohibit development of a nature which appears contrary to the intent of the the value of property, here the public in the form of many present comprehensive plan and the general welfare_ of area residents, argued that they would be benefited by the the citizens of the Town. uses permitted under a rezone and, indeed, would prefer Despite the use of the word "interim" in the above section, yen greater restrictions. Moreover, the opinion letters of we do not believe that it is in fact an interim zoning ordi- layer's appraisers spoke of a reduction in value of approx- ( nance. There is no reference to any emergency situation, imately one-half, but there was no evidence the property nor is there any indication in the ordinance or elsewhere in could not be put to a profitable use, as required by Carlson r the record that the Town deviated from the regular notice v. Bellevue, supra. By way of comparison, in Carlson the and hearing procedures specified in RCW 35.63.100 et seq. court upheld a rezone that allegedly reduced the value of Ordinance No. 475 in fact makes several substantive the property from $60,000 to $2,500. It is with poor grace changes in the zoning code. It reclassifies several tracts of that Mayer complains of a reduction in value when it land, eliminates two use districts, amends the comprehen- acquired the property at a time when it was zoned more sive plan, and, as pertinent here, redefines the retail use restrictively than "neighborhood commercial," then district so as to prohibit the construction of duplexes and obtained an apparently greater valuation due to a 1967 multi-family units. These zoning changes, being permanent change but chose not to build as then permitted, and now to the extent any zoning ordinance is permanent until begrudges the town's attempt to fall back to an intermedi- modified or replaced by a later one, are sustainable as an ate zoning position. In any event, Mayer has not borne its _ attempt 'to prohibit development . . . contrary to the burden of showing such a diminution in value as to amount intent of the present comprehensive plan." (Italics ours.) to a confiscation. See 1 R. Anderson, American Law of f We cannot agree with Mayer's contention that the ordi- ming § 3.25 (2d ed. 1976). 7\- ' nance is an .example of interim zoning which must fall Finally we address the challenges to ordinance No. 475, . because it fails to declare a termination date and was not i.e., that it is an example of illegal "interim zoning" and passed as an emergency measure. That it does -not contain that it should be applied to parcels zoned "retail" only after - those elements is further evidence that the Town simply the effective date of the ordinance. enacted changes in its existing zoning laws to effectuate the Interim zoning describes a process whereby a govern- purposes of its then existing comprehensive plan; such an mental body in response to an emergency situation tempo- ordinance was within the Town's authority. McNaughton v. rarily establishes an ordinance to classify or regulate uses of Boeing, 68 Wn.2d 659, 414 P.2d 778 (1966). land pending either revision of the existing zoning code or [3] The rule on retroactivity of zoning changes is that adoption of a final, comprehensive zoning plan. 1 A. . application for a building permit vests in the applicant the Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning § 11.01 (4th right to use his property as then permitted, and that a sub- ed. 1975); Smith v. Skagit County, 75 Wn.2d 715, 453 P.2d sequent change of zone cannot divest him of that right. 832 (1969); see RCW 36.70.790. State ex rel. Ogden v. Bellevue, 45 Wn.2d 492, 275 P.2d 566 MAYER BUILT HOMES v.STEILACOOM May 1977 May 1977 BOVY v. GRAHAM,COHEN WAMPOLD 567 899 (1954). Mayer had not, however " a for a permit to The judgment is affirmed. build a structure on its property w_ 3es permitted PETRIE, C.J., and RINGOLD, J. Pro Tern., concur. under the retail classification prior to adoption of ordinance No. 475. The ordinance, on its face, limits the uses for property in the then existing retail use district. Once the ordinance disallowed certain uses within the retail district, Mayer's property was subject to the reduced usages possi- ble, no other use having vested. Although not explicitly argued, Mayer's challenge to the retroactivity of the Town's zoning changes is subject to another interpretation. Ordinance No. 475 forbade the con- . . .�' struction of multi-family dwellings on Mayer's property, having eliminated that use from the retail district. The effect was -to prevent such construction until passage of ordinance No. 496, so that it would have been futile for Mayer to have applied for a permit to build a multi-family structure after adoption of ordinance No. 475. Given that fact, Mayer's argument can be interpreted to be that, if ordinance No. 475 is invalid, then the result must be that Mayer would have been entitled to obtain a multi-family permit up until passage of ordinance No. 496,'which could not lawfully relate back to the passage of an earlier, invalid ordinance so as to prevent the construction of multi-family - - dwellings prior to ordinance No. 496. In sum, if ordinance No. 496 validly prohibits multi-family dwellings on Mayer's property, it does so only as of its own effective date, and ( invalidation of ordinance No. 475 would, until that date, leave Mayer where it was before adoption of ordinance No. 475, namely, able to build a multi-family dwelling as then • permitted in "retail." This argument, however, is premised on the invalidity of ordinance No. 475. With that ordinance . having been upheld, the argument falls. S Hr I C • ' � M POLY. DIRECTORY 1963 - 1977 RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • JUN201978 AM PM 71819. 1011111211 121314171[' ! . 7,IfNO. •*-.) NO -4?,Q- ��Y • iIDLER,McBROOM, GATES & BALE '.I 1000 NORTON BUILDING SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 Memorandum To: JRI Date: 19 JUNE 78 From: MICHELE Re: Renton Hills Downzoning (Street Study) MILL AVENUE SOUTH (south from S. 3rd Street intersection) 1963-1977: Street addresses decreased by 4 during this period. However, where there were 25 available apartment units in 1963, there were 39 available by 1972. All 14 new units (2 complexes) appear in the 400 block. A • breakdown of the five year's data we have follows. A red star indicates there are street numbers in that block followed by (1/2) . This, I would imagine, could reflect a trailer or guest house on the property or perhaps a basement apartment or room for rent. 1963 300 block = 6 (24) * 400 " = 11(Includes one 5-unit apartment complex and addresses at 404 1/2 & 410 1/2) 500 " = 6 600 " = 1(This is a 20-unit apartment complex) 24 1972 • 300 block = 4(two State Dept. of Hwy. offices, located (22) at 311 and 316 in 1963, are no longer listed) W400 = 12(412, which was vacant•in 1963, is now an 8-unit apartment complex. 422, which was not listed•in 1963, is a 6-unit apartment complex. Still includes addresses at 404 1/2 '& 410 1/2.) 500 = 5(503, which was vacant in 1963, is no longer listed.) 600 " = 1 22 1973 300 block = 4 (22) ;4' 400 " = 12 No change from 1972 • 500 " - 1 22 • • 1975 300 block = 4 (21) ar400 = 11 (430, which was vacant in 1973, is no longer listed) 500 = 5 600 " = 1 21 • 1977 Addresses decreased by 1 since 1975(328 no longer listed) • y) is SALES AND SERVICE I �� Attune s++0 1 i 1 Y'm 1 !l �f + ii7 Mil St SAldwla .•1Ge4 333 Williams Street .y � Lv Meadow—COntd 10 Mill—Contd 2009 Gannon Jack K G AL m 5 4960 215 Evans Ellen E Mrs®AL MILL r—From Commercial Chalet The apts 2016 Wallis Wm B O AL �!^ 6430n Waterway tee 1 east of Man 1 Coetagn0 Dennis �t� a 218 Podrtznik Frank J O'AL 120 Lbr way I hse)aL 2 Page Harold BA 615288 ^ � 120 Lbr Mkt(whae) g Bohart Eva Mrs 2020 Lae Harold C O AL w ,� 6-2824 125 Joe'e Riverside Sery gas eta 4 Haeft Keith S 5-3776 i. -� 219 Montgomery id Geo BA 6-1737 - AL b98442021 Salter Lloyd W O AL C (n �o � 5 Hanson Lea F Mrs BA 5-9848 {y Z. .� �1 Z ��'2 Leon G BA 8-0700 2027 Stewart Joe O AL 5-9747 i • .Y , •� Q• 6.5738 - av Intersects - 6 Schrlber Kirk E 2026 Anderson Oscu F G AL r .�K o' 225 Lantz Petar K O AL 6-f1440 202 Vacant 7 Eacola Chas R s _ '.� Q E�^ 226 No return - 204 McClun Wm L BA e-09665-3878 a �� � 1 g8 Colville Ann Mrs .� - • `n ,-� 227 elute Rose Mn O 210 Williams Rocket.Mrs O 9 9mutny Peter 2036 Vacant Eug T OO AL ; w p 227 Phillips Albert W AL 5-4795 10 Orrell Wm L 1 230 Shopin Walter C O AL 5-4213 ' 211 Mason Dwight N 11 Aichele Dennis O 2037 Abney Percy 0 AL PP P a. -4 Q Z 235 Hamel Ovila 215 Williams Wesley B O AL 12 Smith Bertha J Mrs BA 5-7690 8 /' �� �� V 2 238 Johnson Arth L O'AL 8-5438 2042 Mathre Anders L S Rev Z ��, r 5-4452 Moore Eva L Mrs AL 13 Nefdhart James R BA �t re An 5-Sa74 m 6-3153 N 1"�1 .'.i 238 Ward Robt L G AL 5-3205 216\43wafford Marian 2045 Walls M C O AL 6-3116� ���-f,� 239 Maleten Sandy a AL 5-3948 21R Petermeyer Gertrude J Mrs 14 Byrd Wm E 204g McKean Howud A O .. Cn 243 Braaten HJalmer O BA 6-AL 6-1313 15 MinerCat-pine Victor J 5-1313 • B-1785 222 Autobahn Inc autos BA 16 Vacant 2051 Carruthers Hector K G j �n °0 243 ParkBurdulis Geo O 6-1680 17 Miner Everett AL 6-7278 243 Marguerite C Mrs O 235 Fire Dept Sta No 1 AL 18 Barnes John. 2054 Perettt Lewis O'AL w > w`V �� gg P 19 Vacant 5-5234 251 Mulligan Jeannett R Mrs O 5-3333 20 Gorden Harry H •= n AL intersects Firemen's Union Local 14 205T Wright Christopher O hi : l;t > I AL 5-1857 0 3d av N No 864 qq++ 300 Richter Win G AL 5-3915 CBISfPBPRR tracks cross D10NTEREY DRIVE—From 2063 Corey Robt O AL 6.3746 U > 4. • �.� 305 Chldlac Joseph Mrs BA Pacific Coast RR tracks cross Bronson pl east and south 2100 Cor elett Wm J O AL fz� -.._;•'e e-4126 Walls Walla av Intersects In semlclr,1 west of Mt 6-936e r., rid av intersects Olivet way 21030 C5_ 9 lea E J AL 310 Jacksonc Jas B BAHarvey 6-2825 311 State Dept of Highways- 1814 Barei Angelo J O AL A' . `a•'i 310 Harvey R O AL Engineering Field Ofc AL 5-7882 5-3945 1815 Grubeslc Angeline Mrs 2109 Vacant xr ;. 61391 2115 Brown WiJOALril3-). a ,_w- 311 Le-1423 Hazel Mn BA 31e State Dept of Highways-Reel- AL 5-0306 0 8-1423 dent Engs Ofc AL 5-1606 1820 Schultz Milton J AL 2121 ye�n O }. � 316 Shepherd Donald W BA 320 Blnsick John C O AL 5.7661 5-5214 2127 Vankeater Hury L O Il'- ,�„ u e-0T85 324 Mllbrnd Richd F 1821 Boehm.Chas M O AL AL 5-4841 o t Z 319 Nelson Edith O Mrs AL 328 Toman Jae O AL 11-5396 - 6-6643 2131 Vacant � ` ju 5.{036 336 Hansen Raymond H O AL 1826 Howard Edw W O ALro 2141O'Br1enRa moodE12•s �(-' 5-3024 5-3895 , H y 320 Fee Denver 4th av Intersects 182T Skreen Cheater O AL 1` a. 1/' 322 Winslow Amanda O Mrs AL �Trottman John C O'AL MORRIS—From 2d av south, ^"4 �1v AaH 6-1849 5-715T 5 west of MainE a c In 325 Farkas Jos O AL 6-12825-5941 1832 Blencoe Harry A O AL 20S Thompson Jack S O BA A•_n0 404 Cullers Chester A 5-7376 B-0315 _329 Clough Natalie M BA&2643 ' 1833 Dlamblrl Win O ALZ 329 Holmes Mildred E Mrs a • 404b4Lerentz Mark 5_Y081209RowleyWmLAL6-08531AL 5-8703 Crosson Otto M1838 Minkler Robt J O AL 213 Bails Mae F Mrs O AL / G ae+iIll g V1 {10 MYkrle Nick M AL 6-3121 6-•ffC�•1, 5-7747 S330 Vetterling Edna Mre O AL`. {30349cholz Esther E Mre BA 280 Rosy Apartments ^•� �+ �. m 1846 Ames Geo W O AL 5-3092 1 Matthews Esther AL 6�'i2935we .cant 1850 Gilmore Robt T G BA Y Mattz June J he 5 L 5- i m■s a g34 R5-74 6ougfae R G AL . 412 Vacant 6.28662 StStultz Jun Wm E AL owl _ 418 MerrmeApartmr Alf P G AL 5-0084 LL 335 Holmes Santry C AL 6-7921 .426 Apartmrnts 1851 Toschl\Valter H O AL �� imt( in - 1 Saker Frank AL 5-9689 5-7687 AL 6-38234 5-6 L1111e Mrs G AL -,; -$Rt Fd 33e Fa�B�Richd W O AL � y 2 Pollock Ronald E18f,1 White Wm A O ,t 3 Vacant1868 Gnn•leon Logan D O AL6 pejio Alec AL S3]64 �i' �;! S339 N'Ittmeyer Ann E Mrs O AL' 4 Dean Chas C5-3508g Mayer Jane C Mrs ALw� Z ,. .rr� f6-9632 5a F.IIe Jeee1859'JooallormanOAL 5J103 Geyer s _ • m4 -•� 341 Thome Vernle E O AL 6trect continued1002PorettlRalnlerOAL7 Lewis Lillie A AL 6.75487O6.roll 430PasroLucyMreOAL5-2829BAddersonJeanMn •� lA 344 CarrollJoe L OO AL 6-fIB67 6-361903 CapesDonaldAGAL 9FashLolaWMn ul'� .� ' V 34454Vacant 434 TomanJae A O AL 614185-2257Sd av intersects 'W 438 Tomas Jos T AL 1f-03011909 Houser Paul W O AL i El 4L. A45PleporEarlROAL6-601415th nv tntcrsects 6-7445306BcaabtoesomApartments er b�'�' 847 Oberg Ceo E G BA 698BT 1BeanbloseomElla Mn � h( ;600 Butler Janet M Mre O AL1012 Cnetllo Kenneth W O ALO AL6-44013S0 Reynolds Richd AL 6.3e31 � 6-ant 6-41842Boswell Floyd U� .) 853 Sea CarrollVOALtL53eT g03Vacant 1915 Sin or Donn A b AL8HallShirley356VacbayCRf;:�F,'•;Y,' 512 Gardner Vlrt�ll IIA 6-10335-0110 4Hall Everett_ OV358 Vacant ,.;4i, t�'„J520 Wright Fann e E Mre O AL (lnprl nv Intersects6Jonos vere JDfrs3S8 Vacant 5-71681921 BeattieIIeimont OAL gTempletonJanetMrs v ti`' 359 Gabriel Alf L O AL 3•IfM 524 Haves Sam 5-2630 AI. Teton O. 4th av N Intersects 538 DuBois Chas B C)AL 5-7460 2003 Holmstrom Rodger E O Street continued +.` Piggott av intersects . , ,, 6th av Intersects AL 6-0216 1,t1+Mt': h • 1t MEADOW AV N—Contd 3203 Lambro Harry T OO CITY HAl lrLontd 202 Vacant tft s r• 336 Farrow Richd W O ALb 4928 DA6 9331 • 1st Fl City Purchasing Dept 201*Sassier Charles 228 1909 . • ' ,Y-" ## ti l 339 Wittmeyer Ann E Mrs (6 3209 Klinefelter Richd OO 228 3310 202*Taggart Marshall L ' .•, lit, �' ALS-9532 3215 Fortune Leonard 1 2d FI Police Court Chamb4 Robinson +±•, {w_ :' t • 2d Fl City Council Chnmben 203*RobinB ry y 344 Thomes Joseph E AL5-91 Ale Jam *��,. f J44 Carroll Joseph L ® ALS8867 9221 Page James A O A1.6-2698 '� 2d FI City Hell(Utility Rm) 301 t Clark Susan N 228-1988 p 3457 Pieper Earl R ® 3901 Titus Eli. Mn ® 7A Fl Humming Bird Inn reetr 302 t\yard L R fs ` M 947 VacantRalph23b2629 {:"' '�y"' M 3307 Russell L O , .; :'�' j 360*Hall Keith 303 t Suia T V j: �' 3d Fl Bldg Dept apt 2 0 418 t Ner ner Alf P ® BA6 1738 tt' r"""� f 3313 Sienda John Jr OO AL6JbB3 g r 369 Vacant 3d Fl City Park Dept 23b2560 .. ii 3319 Ponder Charles F ® - 422 Apartments ��+r�!`'-i 368 Nor Jerry L BA8-0868 7 HenryA 3d Fl City Plu& Recreation 1O14Brcitling Fay • • - �_?". +.•.'i'„�. Dept 2rks & 1 = .A„t�,:u3 368 Barrett James 3407 nry Joe F O ',•y�..- ,f 3d Fl City Parka & Recreation 102 t Curran Dennis t,�: tt rt.;:•, 359 Smith 0 Russell ® ALb b908 3413 Prellwitz Leo A O Dept(Conference Rm) 201*Fades Dan }eft y! c1 • 1 9603*Krantz Richd O .,vy i 211 3609 Vacant 3d Fl City Planning Dept 202 Kirkaldie Bob .. 236-2660 301*Hart Jerry - .,,4.yy; .• F 2219 Welt Leslie C OO BA8•5671 9616 Montgomery a'eldon E • 4th FI City Eng 235-2631 902*Benders Dick �.. ,r., N 24TH ST INTERSECTS ALb 4693 4th Fl CC De Of Public • 2407 Ames Frank E ® BA6-263b 3606 Robel Eug F O AL6•7776 Y 426 Apartments •• ,•,-,�„.0'.. - i 2411 Hoven Wm J O 266-0673Works 23b2669 2*Glentt Juanita ' �..aa.•,r.�E 3607 Nelson Emil H O AL6-6750 -,-; �s-• 2415 Vacant 4th Fl City Traffic Dept 2*Glenn Kathy j 7{ c-:1.'t 3619 Mitchell Gordon C Jr ® 23 my g Crutchfield Vs Nita R ..F,�`, .' r 2418lFakharzedeh Javad 228-1231 AL67416 r �., •1 2419 Collier's Masonry BA6-1912 3701 Zimmerman Roy L 226-4249 6� Gunty Dut Ct Call Colette `.0 1} IIA63611 •t : • il I Collier Geo F OO BA6-1912 3704 Savage Richd K (6 271-0166 4 t Gll V ;•,Iy 6th FI Cit Munici Court i. 2421 Aliment Ray J OO BA6-5033 9706 Clasen Harold R OO y 5*Nyberg Nyberg John i t' .� -ay 2422 Van Ausdal Homer A ® BA6-6686 2ty Atty -�.� _•, :. 6th Fl City Atty 2362600 430 Vacant -r �^ ;i ' ' ALS3022 3708 Ritz Audereen S Mn O f 6th FI Mayor until 20 434 Smith L A O V +v �, 2602 Muller Gerhard K O BAatt 6th FI City Council 2362683 436tSevern Jerry ® 226-22T1 E `y .;.i1:_ ry N BA6-3762 9709 Moffatt Robt L O BA6-2897 6th Fl City Fire Dept 2362642 S 5TH ST INTERSECTS U 4:-.:3/4'.'''''--• j 2604 Shelton Evelyn Mrs 9719 Baker James C 0 ALA-6146600*Williams Preston E G W i K 6th Fl Bd Of Pub Wks& „ ` 2606*Anderson Kerry OO 9716 Grinolda Willie 226-7167 Airports 2362691 266-3973 H •c ...rt. ;t s 2606 Lowder Goo W GO 9719 Roes Jay H OO BA6-1541 STREET CONTINUEDq f- '+t"f't • � 2507 Cullers Chester A OO 512 Thelander Charles A O rr ;., I. 3804 Virgillo James 211 Vacant w.%•� yy ALb2686 3902 Johnson Vera S MrsBA6�812 , r.,. +,t. •j 2610 Alfarone Jerry OO BA6-1924 BA6-8272 215 Vacant 620 Vacant a n-, Vacant s N 26TH ST INTERSECTS 3903 Carrolli Thoe A O AL6-2998624 Vaunt a ) 21615 Vacant b3B Du Bou Charin B 2603 Vacant 390'3t Corbett Bill 217 Petermeyer Gertrude J Mn - j 2604 Benny Ronald D ® 9892 Shreve Wayne C ® ALb4760 tV C' �.' •i-• BA8-2533 ALb9443 Oi AL6-t313 ,' 2607 Iloehme Joseph C ® 236 Firemen's Union Local 864 S 6TH ST INTERSLX.'fS O1 y P N 40TH ST INTERSECTS CityFire Dept Su No 1 606 Chalet The apu ,� • AL6-21.68 4008 FawcettRobt A OO AL6-6407 236265b 1 t Trwitske M W _ a+ • i 2609*Hoffman David D ® C M ST P& P RR TRACKS 2 t Collins L � • 228 1600 10 CROSS 3 Zehnder Susan ^') _ r~l, r 2610 B aarlet Mark S 226-4449 MILL AV S —FROM CEDAR PACIFIC COAST RR TRACKS 4 Backman Dorothy . 2611*Eriksen Ronald (6 RIVER WATERWAY SOUTH CROSS 6*Barrows Lynn 265-6666 • t 2613 Drew Melvin C O Ah6-6206 1 EAST OF MAIN AV S ROUSER AV S INTERSECTS a , 2613 La Valley Win T C:) 8 t Shay B ..II S 3D ST INTERSECTS 7tStone D AItc378 1 2618 Clow Allen J BA6-6624 ZIP CODE 98066 320 Vacant 8*Matter Barb y 2704 Hammond Edw 0 ® BRONSON WY S INTERSECTS 324 Angelo Nick ® 9 R J l Fr 328 Wright Anna C 226.1849 Burkey 1 ....14 BA6-2910 12 936 Hansen Raymond H ® 10 Best Tim _ 2710 Rankin Lorana N O S 2D ST INTERSECTS ALS-3024 11 t Ford Se 0 .• t .- BAe 5087 200 City Hall BA8J310 S 4T1 1 ST INTERSECTS 12*Ford 8 I ; ` . .•.� 2711 Frankcle Edw J 8) 226-1930 Police Dept 29b2600 400 No Return 13*Jenkins Martin ;1 V 0 2712 Bowles Chalmer H ® Floors 404 Niceen David B AIS-1768 14*Knnpp L .__1 - Os \ '^ti • BA6.4946 let Fl City Clerk 235-2600 404SS Mc Donough Kathy N l.6 t Richards W W - 1 2716 Arthalony Stephen E ® lit Fl Data Processing Dept 226-4042 16 Ferguson Simone Mn +•k �I BABS093 23b2639 410 Grove Claudine E Mn ALb401.8 ` ,� ; •. 2716 O'Neal Terry G OO BA6-6206 1st Fl City Utilities Dept AIkT384 1T Hamilton Wm D ! .i } 2717 Geffre Jerome G o0 41055 Scholz Esther E Mn• �. 2362520 18 Kristianson Rolf i BA6-8742 lit Fl City Finance Dept BA6-4867 19 Vacant x 2719 Vacant r+ 2721 Machlii John ® BA6 1236BA8-3310 412101*Kamp Kern i� 1st Fl City Print Shop 20 Frwt Ernest 1 I. 1 .. -/-,_. *-u -/ - • • • 613*5 / ` yr tsttONSON 620 R WINDSOR S T • WEST AND NORTH 712-E . a` " ." -h�CuLAR DIRECTION 715 I --.'iI> l k,. 179 VE YOU. !�, 7-. MEADOW AV N—Coma 2712 Bowling imer A O • • IAL BANK -r. 322 Winslow Amanda G Mrs z715 Arthalony Stephen E® •_ L'. p16 6051. BA65093 .k• W Msr...r.o l e. GOO BA86206 • j WOilON IttNt1:Ill Ivor lre.1. 925 Farkas Joseph O pL51282 2716 O Neal Teary .�! 926 i Center Joseph C �17 Jerome G BA66742 1e.� 4 < g29 Holma Mildred E Mrs O 2719 Kaufmann Robt J BAB-1425 i! -;` AL5-6703 <' gap i Rowe W m T.Jr 2710364 3203 i ambios John O BA61236 ;1 1 Ine •Lou A Mrs •:�: 9203 Iambic Harry T 0 L::; q Y :11; gg4 t Fortney Ernie F BA6 2091 BA6.9331 -.t Barbara �, 995 Holma San a w O9 9209 Kliaefelter Riehd O. na in Larry . s_ 336 Farm 63216 Fortune Leonard I O tat 339 Wittmeyer Ann E Mrs O AL5.2718 ' naghaa Jeanne M ?" 'a Zell Ciirtia BA8.2047 32 1 Yoga James ° - $41 ThhomassjVernie E AL5.3261 3301 Titus Elir Mrs i thus Willard ';. 944 Carroll Joseph L O AI,S9867 93U7 Ralph Rtteaell L ann Thee E •',�--- '. S45 Pieper Earl R O 3319 Sienda John Jr O ALS9583 iecks Ralph • 347 Vacant 3319 Ponder Charles F O zit Jai, 350 t Caul Lamont D 271.1491 AL5 3157 Liman Anita .t•:: 353 Vacant 3407 Henry'Joe F O 366 i Norlleet Jerry L BA8 2487 3413 Prellwitz Leo A O e;* Fraa'oes E Mrs 358 Barrett James BABd868 3503 Vacant Inatl.rt.Lillie M Mrs 359 k Smith O Russell O AI,6 5908 5509 Worley le Roy W O ' roar +.. ' Weldon E O '' Ant ;. 20 g51F Montgomery r t CONTINUEDMontgomery en Armilla L Mrs O 2219 Walt hmlie CoG O BA65571 T C Mrs' ;r N 24TH ST INTERSEI TS AIS-0S62 &' '-:.e Cassia L Mrs O 2407 Ames Franit E O BA6 2535 3606 Aortal Bug F O AI,S 7776 • • , i-7623 - ;� • 2411'Hcven Wm J O 3607 Nelson Emt1,H O AL64i760 rot . 2415 Vacant • 9613 Mitchell Gordon C Jr O " :rich Frank V O i=: 2418 Vacant AL5.7416 52155. ?A19 Colliers Masonry BAS-1912 g701 Zimmerman Rey L ,, ys Ellen E Mrs O Collier Gee F O BA61912 3704*savage,Rlchd K O 271-0765 =. ` 09 2421 Aliment Ray J O BA6-5033 3705 Clasen Hal R 4) BA66686 i :-292 Frank J O 2422 Van Ausdal Homer A O 3708 i Ritz Audereen S Mrs.O 5-2924 • AL53022 BA6-4017 •� :hild Geo BA6.1737 , Muller G K O BA63762 3709 Moffatt Robt L O BA82897 Man Vera 0 Mrs Q g719 Baker James C O ALis5145 !'? • • 5 2222 2504 t Shelton Evelyn Mrs 9716 Grinold Willis zr John 0 O AL5-9504 Kirkman Mrs O H'O BA6.1541 2505 Kiikman Kathryn 3719 Roos Jay . ant• 'a(. • ALS6661 3804*Visgillo R F `r... _ maid Jacob F O '.. 2506 Lowder Gee W O 3902 Johnson Vera S Mrs 0 ? s Leroy O ALS 1034 2507 Grillers Cheater O BA6b272 etich Juliana Mrs O. 9903 Cerrolli Thoa A AL5 2998 .1, '' .ar:s Jell 55770 ;a 2510 Alfarone Jerry O BA6 1924 3909 i Pitner Doha nel Ovile AL5-0294 N 267'H ST-INTERSECTS 3932 Shave Wayne C m 4J;"• • nson Art L O BAB-9686 - rd Edna J Mrs O 26034 BAB-4 9 Dennis O, N INTERSECTS �;' • :' BA64894 5.4295 t .. etta•Sandy O AL►3948 'ir;` 2604 Benny Ronald D O 4008 Fewoett,Robt A O AL56407 • ' miner Lewis P AL6.0629. 2607 Boehm Joseph C AL5 2168 10 eta•> dubs Mable J O :".` 2609 Vacant M1LL AV S—FROM CEDAR �. • • ° WATERWAY.SOUTH k Marguerite C Mra O 2610 t Barlet Mark S O ZZfr4449 RIVER Wee Mike BA8b537 '• 2$11 i Ericksen Ronald 1 EAST OF'MAIN AV S �.1' ST INTERSECTS �`- nt5 li hter Wm OO AL6S915 ��{' 2613 Drew Win T O ZIP CODE 98055 •:... area H O BA6.1786 dv• 2616 La Valley BRONSON WY S INTERSECTS �� • AL5.6378 es Dorotha M Mrs .A.' 2616 Clow Allen J O,BA6-6624 12 . •^e 71 kaon Harvey R O t a,, 2704 Hammond Edw O O' ••..4'I! (lr9945 BA6.2910 S 2D ST INTERSECTS. .��,1 Bent - 200 City Hall BA63310 :t rant 2710 Rankin Lotens N O Police Dept 235-2600 , erton Donald R BA6-3627 BA65087 Floors i� 'arson Eddie® BA66155 2711 i Frankcle Edw J BAfr5171 ! • 1973POLK DIRECTORY ` • • • l ',,lr ' t . r1 ,v ¢::x" n L �.. .tattVt l� wd.. 1':S; .- i3 is �'rrr ;:+: )•.d U._ +t-'l y.��} +i >• •e '� , {•,' ') y 4 Y- fNl f tlf 1t�y�r ly/ ! • t 7 �'Y t�S-1 i l .ry�F ; I:.2 r t � .h` t. r471 .. l- ,�1tr {y1�"\•�f• $• f I 0-.- r l < r{c n ,;�r a•i• Y.+ c •f: aE+,'t rz ., 5�j� �! y q: .a �✓e' a ti{.F} R cf f t'-Tp,,, 7,-,rt^ a is, .a t•� t drtti,•!'"'M1 :F,� 4).,:v. ..>+t- ,al. >+.c (. •4-— y. '„'> ,yl{r,,,,,,t 4^1'" v•5r,7. ' rG. .. k 'it-a t ��;4- A, ^j1 t `C`+. } ?I 'k J. 1. '� r .,S jr -SY .,,y •�•{ B SI t- . ,` '.. K .tY•a -'- ;:cir,W-.Jt.• ,l '� >r f-.f a.'r t e52 -.i*.'rt -i 4 h�' J. ... > .. `,.' - - �,t,-..�, `, '•�� 1 ,y �L r •�E"r^ xi'tx 4 ? V.,1"� ,•tY",-'kynr� l ,> i 1. a '. ,,»ate";:, �.1 '•`�++C+w �• 'i.4 c' *.g: . ;'Yt 1•,N f f r1,.4' :• >>.t'(c t .y va ti 1 a' Cs C', ,.' .C •t f.• •..I'.� w o k•t�R- '�,tl'e •�tt ': q}.„ s. �.— Y� F i egg.y� • J �-.A••s , '.u.k t,c, r t..,-,,,,,..,,,.ace... •44; .. •.. 1,1 C ,.rs r>s • .'4 'Y 1-..,,a„,' a '! J 'trl°r.." .,l•1.',',',,['..�t{L�`•" • ,, 4• } l']t,,, • l -e s ti -' . d� ' `; rgxvY t.� t Alk 4iay 4.s��{ v a�• .:'1� :r.td� '' .i7':^ ,i•. 1ti j . . k:? w+>•s -'A `l %, *ot7af. tr,t ::. VO•Fe.'n'ke-,4•?'Z" '^ia .tl "f'r_t•-":: ¢1 ! ?.• 1 J.1�,� /1t�%0. . ,�yl�•• ,r ,.y,'�r, .. _k; rt ,,,,-r .' l z-, M tr_ 14,J+' ,. >,A --.r' y ,74 s,�'. r..�l..:.: .1. t,p`,;�7w�-�r.;Cy�`y��4,i c, 4. 4 ( , v"3• 1•`na ' 4 .'4'.,..v• ''tll tl .) •' • �V.'..i'.''i'o• x'dY�. �,:Ki•... •CM• 0.. t f6L::YY k y'r,ji..4g.•�6.,:':,,.. i::>�N^13a'ur ,.i. . 4 .r. •:: tug• •••• °: ,A-. Mai , ifVF1 , • 46 • J. 4 _-, yr be4ONSON R'AY NE AND WINDSOR - _ WAY NE WEST AND NORTH a4 A CIRCULAR DIRECTION 180 I t CITY HALL—Contd 902*Alexander Maude MONROE AV NE—Co 1st Fl City Clerk 235-2530 BA67968 414 Brown's Roy Auto 4. 1st Fl Data Procesaing Dept 303*Carson Carl t ALS-4966 235-2539 418*Merger Alf P 0BA61738 422 Apartments 622 Muthlinaki Margt t 1st Fl City Utilities Dept AL5-2642 L 235-2520 101*Bishop Win 550 No Return e lat Fl City Finance Dept 102*Stevens C NE 6TH PL INTERS! C BA83310 201*Clough R 650 Schultz Alf A OO B 2d Fl Police Court 235-2564 202*Kirkeldie B NE 7TH ST ENTERS 2d Fl City Purch Dept 301*Crossett Bruce 701 Reorganized Churol 3d Fl Bldg Dept 2362540 302*Galvin Jeffrey D Christ Of L D S I 3d Fl City Park Dept 235-2560 426 Apartments 711 Vacant 9d FI City Pks& Recreation 1*Lovell Illiam L 716 Vacant C Dept 235-2560 ' 2*Hardy Timothy W 717 Breeze Louis D 9 P 9d Fl City Planning Dept 3 Crutchfield V It 746 Vacant 235-2550 4 Hutchinson Danl J BA6-2088 .4, 3d Fl City Street Dept 758 Vacant 4th Fl City Eng 2352631 4305 Vacant�l ette V 758 ®CAI �i leant 360 4th Fl City Traffic Dept `F 434*Smith L A 4. 762 Kingrey Myron BA 6th Fl City 35-2620 DistD' Ct BA6-3511 436 Tomac Joseph T O AL 0301 , 766*Cumming Christoi 6th Fl Mayor 235-2580 S 5TH ST INTERSECTS I BA6-3850 MnOO 6th Fl City Council 235-2583 500 Butler Janet M 770 Fisher Shelton L c 6th Fl City Fire Dept AL53973 NE 8TH ST INTER 512•1 nelander Charles A OO 808 Vacant 6th Fl Bd Of Pub Wks& BA6-4812 809 Munson Eben L C Airports 235-2591 520 Vacant 812 Little Douglas S C Gene 228- i STREET CONTINUED S38u Charles Bois Char B BA61325 817 Bowen Denzil@ 211 Phipps Steph P O A 760 823 Fredell Howard O I 215 No Return S 6TH ST INTERSECTS 851*Bates Gary W O Vacant 2151, Davis Loren 606 Chalet The apt., 855 Elliot Ernest L e 217 Petermeyer Gertrude J Mrs 1*Martin Harold -• 859 Peabody Michl A O ALS-4313 2 Bonds Judith 863 Blake Richd L O 235 Fireman's Union Local 864 3*Zehnder Susan j 867 Mc Donough Haro City Fire Dept Sta No 1 4*Backman Dorothy AL .1110 AI.33_3 5*Hensley Joseph E 2261526 870 Daniels Wendell E C M ST P& P RR TRACKS 6*Feigenbaum David 871 Watts Wilbur W l CROSS 7 Roller Richd L 880 Broeme Floyd M PACIFIC COAST RR TRACKS 8*Dotson Michl e CROSS 9*Burkey R J NE 9TH ST INTER HOUSER AV S INTERSECTS 10*Best Tim 903 Torsak Stan O A' S 3D ST INTERSECTS 11*Giese Clarence 909 Paulus Raymond 320 Vacant 12 Vacant BA61905 324 Angelo Nick © 13*Richards Robt J 271-1890 910 Cutler James R E C 328*Wright Anna C 2261849 14 Burgos Lino 915*Harker Bruce O 336 Hansen Raymond H OO 15 Moreland Walton W 916*Frint Ralph L C ALS-3024 ALS-1548 Nugent Karen J S 4TH ST INTERSECTS 16 Ferguson Simone Mrs • 921 Blakstad Ethel O 400 Trottman John C OO ALS5941 ALS-4018 NE 10TH ST INTEI •404 Niesen David B AIS-1788 17*Hamilton Wm D :i, 1005 Noble Alvin E 4041/2*Mc Donough Kathy N 18 Kristiansen Rolf 1009 Lambert Ross W 410 Grove John N AL57364 19 Vacant •R A1.5-4174 4105E Scholz Esther E Mrs 20*Frost Ernest Y 1013 Crutchfield Roby BA6.4857 ALS-7781 412 Apartments 6 • 1019 Broyles Wm O 101 Kernkamp Sue A MONROE AV NE—FROM NE 1022 Luttmann Walt., BA8-4061 4TH ST NORTH 3 EAST OF • BA61616 102*Corner Helene EDMONDS AV NE 1024 Bethlehem Luth. w 201 Sanford Wayne C ALS-9772 • 2C2*Walkdeo Arth ZIP CODE 98055 1025 Gist Geis O r 203►Bell Joy 404 D&T Automotive repr 1066 Prall Edw E Al 301*Yount Terry BA8-2310 NE 11TH ST INTE }i . 1973 POLK DIRECTORY �? y•a ( r a ti,f.v . - r#ti.'r •.- ik t 1 !:� '1 ri w Xl , •C' ,�^xi�e F fi-:'.;:..1.:-... ' ,• -.'Lr ''ynr • .k":.,--:":. y r 404it r•7•� .� � � �'f T..7 Y. `Ka+ Sr i .�d r'nf .. .♦ f'' b. ram. z. t't.. ;r 4 0 is 'n i -.f.s f L i -Y e .. _ .i. • ---------... • McLENDON HARDW 'ARE, Inc. 2' 4.,r- g SINCE 1934 7 .: .. • Plumbing and Water Prpe '� t``=� .' J : '•Aard.+are and Electrical Supplies - Pinsburgi Paints 7 'VC) - B ,s t M�14 Streit,Restos zr;. r Telephone 226.2110 h70 f •• :ti.` - 5 6� 183E Illid 'Cr 3 ;247;..1 e �.L AV i-contel 512 Thelander Charles A O (! • Pysrneyer Gertrude J Mrs S --� c;: 3 ��/� :0 115.4313 520 Vacant c,_ 4- I - • !1YamanY Union Local 864 524 Vacant v `" y t�;' : Dept Ste No 1 538 Du Bois Eliz Mrs O 2554760 • r' •y41-.• AVb S 6TH ST INTERSECTS - .ic• ~ Y ST P 6 P RR TRACKS 606 Chalet The apt•228-2212• +— =` �S l*Millner Elmer 235-0718 CD _PACIFIC • - - max_ WISER AV S INTERSECTS 4*Thonanar David imi■ r•�., , i a S IID ST INTERSECTS 5*Elder Robt �a .24. • z•40 1DsL sch Dennis L 6*Waters Michl 226.8617 sum • t ; ;at Ample Nick Oa 7*Hays Terry 226-9237 Lti` • Y - t,D Wrr`ht Anna C 226 18/9 8*Coch Robt g JQ Kamen Raymond H @ 9*Cogger Tim 226-7795 , 231N 224 10 Best Tim W 226-5965 . :Dept a 4TH ST INTERSECTS 11*Cogger Lynn 228-0680 '2 lama r • , : co No Return 12*Warren Mary J 271-2330 = e • .-- •::ep p Nissen David B 255 1788 13*Brown Norman 228-2212 Q Co, ' ?: . Id%Mc Donough Kathy N 14 Knapp Laoelle -• pt 226-1042 15*Casey Jerry z �� s - - '4. 410 Grove Claudine E Mrs 16 Ferguson Simone Mrs 1t144 �'k. =�'- 2557364 255-4018 CJ7 > � +• kpt p0it Scholl Esther E Mrs 17 Hamilton Wm D '+ ''� ,; 2264857 18 Kristiansen Rolf W i r fit. Men y ) 1 Dennison 19*Sha Geo • "� i �' '' �,r "..-A,...: ibc 20*Rogers Paul sins• '• �' 102*Gowin Michl C7 • c at '. l r« =Yly' • c ln, 201 Sender Charles 228-1909 16 N 0 i s' 'r . -2 MINRLER AV—FROMCa3 = f' ' ' 202*Ward L R 255A342 760E g rit)►�r40.41.: 450 203 Vacant ANDOVER PK EAST w, '- � iuo .301 Clark Susan N 228-1988 su a� t.• 902*Suzick Jane 271-0196 ZIP CODE 98055 mom !tI r_ • F ti y woe .'303 Susa Thos ` �• , t m) 418 Nergner Alf P @ 226-1738 6 o GA.. •' t-'Is s , :^ 422 Apartments MONROE AV NE—FROM NE W « :• '•'' V ty101 Sparkland 4TH ST NORTH 3 EAST OF 3. j r yr �5F''-•'r ":102*Thompson Adrienne EDMONDS AV NE ^i. - }� t = _ 226-6438 t v • ,. . ..i.:1b1*hlason Ralph J ZIP CODE 98055 °D �t ,r } •�� " • :( '202*Falk Roberta 404 Ja-Merica Motors repr W /� v1 �.,rrt. yZ -- 301 Hart Jerry 226-8440 22&2310 �, ill r426.302 Bendara Dick 414 Bra y Auto Service . I •:,I • 1tSe Apartments Paul b22 Muchlinski Margt Mrs OO 554966 * 1—+ r "• 2*Webber Russell 255-2642 "* '-'."` i'`, 9 Crutchfield Va Nita R 550 Jacobs Norman L Oa 255-1818 d —1 ' • NE 6TH ST INTERSECTS on `271-1485 + NE 6TH PL INTERSECTS H 2 . 4*Starkovich Steve NE 7TH ST INTERSECTS "� _ s a'i'• r 6*Danz Debbie < J t s [ 434 Smith L A NE 7TH PL INTERSECTS r• • +3�'_c 436 Severn Jerry O 701 Reorganized Church Of Jesus ° ?' ' S STHSev ST INTERSECTS 8 Christ Of L D S 2262360 B is.. , 600 Vacant 711 Walker Wm E OO 2281462 a ',."" 717 Brees Louis D O 255-2550 V1 c i l ' j{}(' •S A. I * t -" 6:'aL..a 'r 1975 POLK DIRECTORY r - Irr,; i it,�1: •r r �r^i'1'E r9ii_ p - : t. /.i4"s,/..' � rK A. .. ,,;C4• !f Ali: �./a r " 't7 a ett"ii �1• T X t „ `S•'`•�v ',7.7,y '� ,gas, `.€ • ''1•r� ` r w ,7 .i .�.}s 1,t'{1 n 1. N 1} ti4 • ]i. p �`. +. yb,rr . � _ a 'l• is C1. 'a' "a ,Ai7•C a - Tr^ h'[�,.(, w- 'r x i7p' '.• e . rl r!00 t+t!k'tI e'r� ,' 7�! ,y� tA.ax. ►•. r'� rt' ,- ,s! '�� }q't �irAR'. •Y •4 �5�•"1 (�wa..e�' r•'.i�.wsl"• .i.. � ti .ti: a t'. ,i7 •'• ♦'T.','. . .. ...'.. .'1 lt. ... /aid , /9Zc • . SAFECO Title Insurance Company alFAST, EFFICIENT TITLE INSURANCE 4 Fourth and Vine Bldg.,2615 dth Are.,Seattle Tel. 292-1550 N L2 MILITARY RD(KF—Contd 4th Fl R City Traffic Division 2232620 16 Casey Jerry 35TH PL S INTERSECTS 5th Fl County Dist Ct 226-3511 16 Ferguson Sit000e Mrs 2654018 24715*Hand Arnold W OO 839.8158 5th Fl R City Municipal Court 235-2564 17 Thompson Adrian 24718 Doug& Dick's Exxon Service 5th Fl R City Any 255-8678 lNKalitehe John 439-9652 6th Fl R City Mayor 2352580 19 Shay Geo 24721 Thom.Peter D 0 839-1342 6th Fl R City Council 235.2586 ID Rogers Paul 24727 Hemel Larry V 6) 8394628 6th Fl R City Fire Dept 2352642 S 248TH ST INTERSECTS 6th Fl R City Personnel 232-2556 518 24812 Trike Set The preschool 941-2117 6th Fl R City Health Ofcr MILWAUKEE BLVD(ALGONA) 24820 Ireland David 839,7719 6th Fl R City Fin Dept(Prevention FROM 1ST AV N SOUTH 1 WEST OF S 249TH ST INTERSECTS Ofc) WASHINGTON BLVD 24904 Kelsey Ronald G 8395939 STREET CONTINUED • 24910 Wnepir Morrie W 43 217 Petermeyer Gertrude J Mn® ZIP CODE 98002 24916 Harlon Ed.,6 839-7835 2554313 WARDE ST INTERSECTS S 250TH ST INTERSECTS 235 flreman's Union Local 864 TACOMA BLVD INTERSECTS 25030 Grace Christian Academy sch R City Fire Dept Su No 1 235-2555 119 Anderson C.L 902489 839.4678 C M ST P&P RR TRACKS CROSS Bacon Quentin 833&519 Grace Baptist Church 8394670 PACIFIC COAST RR TRACKS CROSS 126 Rhea Claude F 633.4472 I• Noah's Ark day care center 839-4670 HOUSER AV S INTERSECTS 192 Nelson Wm •6331458 25040 Moms Wm M S 9D ST INTERSECTS 2D AV S INTERSECTS 25921 Yount Delmar E e 852-1952 320 Lynch Dennis L 216*Ogar Ronnie Lti.� S 260TH ST INTERSECTS 324 Angelo Nick 8) 218 Vacant 260154Waller Eug M Winget R Gene 2331922 220 Holbrook Steph O 26039e Heave Ronald C O 854-4083 336 Hansen Raymond H 88 255-3024 CLAY ST M INTERSECTS 26061 Vacant S 4TH ST INTERSECTS 6 Palko John L• 8334792 26201*Frey Lewis H 6542682 400 Vaunt 239 Braniff John H i) 6338471 26219 Vacant 404 Pedrora Henry 2269112 241 Caliboso S C€ 8330692 iwis 26229 Gilmer 4041h Vacant 3D AV S INTF-RSECTS 26241*Jackson Cal N 852-6283 410 Grove Claudine E Mn 255-7364 316 Mc Farland Albert G ip A335337 26247 Larson Nancy L Mn 9 410%Scholz Esther E Mrs 716-1857 322 Vacant S 264TH ST INTERSECTS 412 Apartments 328 Vacant CS 0 26425 Findley Charles T 852-7893 101*Jerni Margt 340 Vacant W e 26505 Levack Norman T Oo 852-2158 102 Avery Jane 235-1721 4TH AV S INTERSECTS 26515 Pitchford Walter G 0 852-8739 201 Vacant401 Cortal Ray C O 0 26525 Vacant 202 Vacant 402 Somers Silver R 9390828 VJin S 265TH ST INTERSECTS 203 Tucker Mary 425 Sobotte Albert 4 833-6475 M S 268TH ST INTERSECTS 301 Case Geo 432 No Return a 302+Alexander Maude 436 No Return N 616 303 Suaa Thor 5TH AV S INTERSECTS MILL AV S(RENTONI—FROM CEDAR 418 Rine Sigifredo 271-2640 J RIVER WATERWAY SOUTH 1 EAST 422 Apartments 616 J OF MAIN AV S 101*Hall Ann MILWAUKEE BLVD N(PACIFIC) Q 102*Jain Padam P 235-4939 FROM 1ST AV E NORTH 1 WEST OF O o ZIP CODE 98055 201 latetti Anthony 255-0220 PACIFIC AV BRONSON WY S INTERSECTS 201 Thu L 228-4386 301 Hart Jerry 2268440 ZIP CODE 98047 f 520 302*Mercer G A 255-7482 101 Yeager B C 8336387 �'T . S 2D ST INTERSECTS 426 Apartments 103*Bennett Hugh E 9953092 n,> 200 City Hall 228.3310 I Call Colette - 105 Whitson Robt A O - ♦� .... V R City Police Dept 235.2600 2*Wittnar Robt - 211 Roth Doug L 433.0817 Floor 3*Eades Ben " -' 301 Vacant S di 200 R City Firemen's Pension Bd 4 Jones Therese 310 AI Par Elementary Seb 4976931 y„ In Fl R City Clerk 235 2500 5 Vacant ELLINGSON RD INTERSECTS u 1st F1 R City Data Proceaaiug Dept 434*Dunnihoo Jerry 235-0147 400 Domenichetti Mario®8332781 235-2539 436*Murphy James A 2284197 414 Ferguson Clyde E O 1333-2985 1st F1 R City'Insurance Bd • S 5TH ST INTERSECTS 415 Sprague Rufus M• 633-4581 sole` let F1 R City Utilities Dept 235-2520 500 Jackson John W ' '-'r e lc F1 R City Finance Dept 2352607 612 Thelander Charles A •-f>tI US . `" III lei PI R City Print Shop •-'' '- 620 Lane Dona. - MILWAUKEE BLVD S(PACIFIC) 1st Fl R City Purchasing Dept 235-2618 524 Vacant " ce ' FROM 1ST AV E SOUTH I WEST OF 2d El R City Police Court 638 Du Bois Elie Mrs•um* `,t -. . • 2d Fl R City Council Chambers '''- RS S 6TH ST INTEECT• '. t' IOI*Smith J R °.. • 2d FlR City Hall(Utility Rm) 406 Chalet The apt. •4•v'` IO2*7Lrner Gerald O 6338754 2d Fl R City Hall(Lunch Rm)--' l*Henderson Sherma 104*O'Han Jim B 9391452 s. 3d Fl R City Bldg Dept 235-2540':'.`. '2 Collins Linda ' . ' 106*O'Hare Lee•8331766 .' :� " . s...9d F1 R City Park Dept 235-2560- 3*Gowin Michl -.. .. 109*Fswiaa Greg cr;'`.,:' 3d Fl R City Phu& Recreation Dept 4 Geire Steve . . n. 111*May Wail - . �•'. r 235-2560 - 6*Msson Jerry - HOMER AV SE INTERSECTS "''j"'. 3d El R City Parka& Recreation Dept 6 Tuihta Jerry 115*Powell Wei H ,."`v.OD • (Conference Rn) 7 Wicks Bruce ll7*Ray Bill El I. .b � 3d Fl R City Planning Dept 235-2550 6*Kal Heim Anil LT 2D AV SE INTERSECTS .- 4th Fl R City Eng 235-2631 9 Ceaterihi Mich] 2D AV SW INTERSECTS 4th Fl R City Dept Of Public Works 10*Ryde Robt 906 Vacant O 2352569 I1*PhiWps Shannon 210 Vacant 4th Fl R City Municipal Arts 12 Rae Linda 212*Richard D ' Commirion 13 Moreland Walton W 2661548 WAYNE AV INTERSECTS 4th FI R City Airport Commission - I4*Csmpba0.^mere 216*Goodman Kassab• les li • '-. 4atei • e i 4 ,ieeie.e/t;4 . . .• 4��a Bowl-For-Neallh"OPEN-DAILY-833-4146 ; •' ---------'---' c 1905 Howard Rd. Auburn 98002' si____ _ _ 1977 POLK DIRECTORY ce•' tl_t.'•� /In&L Jr,7 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH . . tap ' ti Memo to JRI from Michele June 19, 1978 Page 2 • • CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH (south from S. 3rd St. intersection) 1963-1977: Street addressed decreased by .6: during this time period. There was no increase in available apartment units. A breakdown follows: 1963 14e300 block = 16 (Includes one 5-unit apartment complex and an address at 339 1/2) 400 " = 13 or500 " = 16 (Includes an address at 509 1/2) 7f^600 = 9 (Includes an address at 629 1/2) 700 = 7 61 1972 300 block = 15 (While•339 1/2 is not listed this year, a vacancy is indicated. Perhaps a room for rent at 339?) 400 " = 13 "500 = 16 (518 is no longer listed, but 540 is • new) • X 600 " = 10 (612 is no longer listed, but 629 is now listed as 629a and 629b. 629 1/2 is still listed also. 630 is new) 700 = l (It would appear they have renumbered 800 = 5 some of the same houses that were listed in the 700 block in 1963) 60 1973 300 block = 15 ( 339 again shows 1 occupant, under which 2 vacancies are indicated. Perhaps 2 rooms for rent this year!) *400 " = 14 (New listing at 414 1/2) • .71"500 = 17 (518, listed in 1963 but not listed in 1972, is back again. Possibly new construction?) *600 = 10 • 700 " = 1 800. = 5 62 1975 • 300 block = 15 400 " = 13 (414 1/2 not listed this year) 500 = 14 (509 1/2, 518 and 540 are not listed) 600 " = 7 (629a, 629b and 629 1/2 are not listed) 700 = 1 800 = 5 • 55 1977 Identical to"1975 • • • • I DETROIT NEW YORK CNICAGO n 701 Sunset Bird.1,at South West Entrants to RenVon Hi9hlends • 1�-4 p .... i R. L POLK & CO. Day •r Night (Ua25 Bsawt Bird. W.) Phone ALide.cs:u 0 �� E ,, 'j seR� Burnett N—Contd • -��.. • 14 Ceder--Contd CEDAR RIVER PARK— 14 Z • 1 �� 646 Wait's Rlchtlald Mf��AL CAPRI AV—From 180 Mon - 419 Nelson Stanley 8 G AL Maple Valley rd,east of w �a 5-0098 • ,r,' terey dr south - 6-6385 O 6th av N Intersects • 104 Kessler Wm T 420 Eisler Walter E O C51SL1'dHaU tracks COW (0 City Hall AL 5-3484 X' 0 �.. ' 111, 1� 110 Martin Merlin F O AL 422 Grassi Azelio R O AL Dora's Coffee Shop 0 :, BIIRNETT PLACE—From a 5-1093 5-4348 Rooms: m •r w v'$.lk.. gig ,£i point south of Tobin to 2d ay. :-' 111 Koome A Frans BA 6-4828 101 Vacant Z s •s• 103 Treasurer a £S !'• 4 1 east of Burnett 117 Williams Clarence S O 425 Vacant M Tobin av intersects _ AL 6-6158 426 Rice Nellie S Mn O D 101 Bledsoe Joseph 122 Wagner Harold H O AL •• BA 6-0993 104 Clerk n y. P 105 Police Judge '_ ` '-� • 113 Fontanna Emil O BA 5-5410 432 Thompson Vera 0 ALr"s"`r c `la 6-0383 ,'• 123 DonnellyWm DOAL 6-4947 106 Police Depttt 117 Pedersen Carl O AL 5-86Y 6-1918 10907 Police y . - 0 .` 433 Romltl •Prudence Mrs O 109 Park Dept e 123 Pythias Temple 128 Aliment Frank O AL 6-8275 Recreation Council o -: o Alchollcs Anonymous 129 Connell Robt L O AL Water Dept P3 ° �F -''s 4 Cedar River Barracks 63726 435 Plano Lawrence E Cr n- w C No 2093 Veterans of World 334 Barron Bernard I..O AL 6-3926 110 Utilities Dept 141 War 1 AL 53't38 5th av Intersects 111 Planning Dept E. ' Welders Union (meeting 135 Schaeffer John G Rev 500 Favro Wm R O AL 54977 114 CouncilMil place) ,�,5-7232 115 Bldg Supt 4li;i F Delphfa Lodge No 12 140 Stone Wm R O AL 5-952: 501 KnightPhurm n Win Engineer �p sl (Koff') 141 Roekhill Randall 60 AL 504 Knight Carl AL 5-5042 118 Mayor Royal Neighbors of 5-3168 605 Plano Phil Jr®)excavat- 4 America 147 Dayle E O AL 1ng senor AL 62121 D, (Renton Highlands)—From �=4 Pythias Slaters Lodge No Garrison . 608 Telban Amelia Mrs O SE 121st north,1 west of = ee 12 150 Holmes Jay E O'AL 7-7484 AL 6J824 North E > ,t . ; Finnish Brotherhood 15E Loomis Royal C C AL 509 Vacant 631 Bruce Gerald D BA 6-4245 �" At .• • Sons of Italy - 1 5-5427 509'hBrikland Jere Mrs 632 No return a H k,!,,'' ,••.. VanValley Dance Studios 12 BA 6-2612 637 Sims Ralph K G AL 5-7000 y 129 Rockey Louisa Mrs O CEDAR—From 1200 8d av 618 Moyers Jas A G BA 8-1759 j 638 Ersland Arth I AL 5-8518 u AL 5-4216 south Roger Fredle 641 Moore Maurice I O a■ �_ � # 16 307 Mooney Phillip R O AL 519 No return • AL 5-4380 W 0 a 1"1 .,h BUSCH PLACE S—ContinuaUoe 5-8830 643 Poff Geo A O AL 5-7923 9+ of 8 Shattuck - 308 Grinolds ManlyN O 526 Telken Lloyd A AL b2080 • 644 Pierce Robt A O AL 5-7192 Ph 'o" A t' 312 Busch Constn bldg contra AL 5-7070 526 Clymer Earl H O AL 656 Staben Leland F O AL• .. ir _ 1 AL 6-1543 - 309 Anderson Margt Mrs O '1 • 6�078 6-8566 . ' ® Busch Wesley J C AL AL 5-3704 628 VanMechelen Robt R O • 657 Fugere Orelle O G AL• , O • e 5-7777 s 310 Rothery John W AL J AL 5-1B19 5.0512 um a - 1 2_ y 4 62911 1 629 Arne Morrie L O AL • 662 Losacco Bobby J - `e rf e C.NORTH(Renton Highlands) - 313 Beck Ralph P O AL 6-9866 •ii p B ) 6-T926 -7 ` E',,, —From SE lento north,High a .t. 3163 Anderson Roy R'(y AI. - 663 Naylor Lawrence F 0 r 0 g. '^ • `d 9 east of Sunset bled E ''a..'^. 5-7424 - 632 Favro Morris O AL 5-1643 U 6 .l 703 Dewey Leslie L O ' ^.t w 1- 317 Moran Harold F O AL 535 Burgess Alton P G AL • 684 Martin Clara Mrs W I O 7 9 704 Holmes Ralph LC)AL t'' i.ee 5 63317 704 Fields Lena Mrs AL a n . 67741 a 321 Gelae Joe A AL 5-4976 539 Toschi Igne.zlo O A• L 5-2057 ,ems • i 44 i~ o b 705 Whitmore Clove A BA 4 % E24 Monaghan Flora AMrs- i 63768 705 Massey Donald R AL ' /1 '111- 8.2896 Y; j' 1i26 Apartments 6th av intersects 5-0788 c fiilgo� 710 Church Dale E O AL 2"i:' 1 Haskell David L 600 Kohilves Gary F AL Z 706 Lawrenson Alberta V O N 5.4763 2 Franzen Bent E 5-22081w ! Y 710 Anderson E11z H Mrs O .� fs+ • Ku .,a 711 Schmalz Frances Mrs i E Long Edith M Mrs AL 601 Cole Theo C 0 AL 5-5634 AL 5-3240 .(7 II— . AL 5-0930 6-0352 608 Caniparoll Dominle O 711 Zachariea Rodney G AL 1 A-+ PM .- 713 Colvin Bernice Mrs ! •- 4 No return 611 Bennett James E AL 6-2963 m m D _ e5 Kenner Rlchd F BA 6-0645 5-3047 714 Fischer Elden O'BA0. gyp: 716 Proctor Everett H OO.. i �( AL 6-3879 l N. Btreet cooUmud t• �>• 802 Beaker Randall 0 AL ti" E27 Novek John O AL 5-810T •�}y,. • 621 Blll612 mey BlByroa R - 715 B ng He zman O @,AL 6-0906 + ¢ i E30 Fulgoni Katb N O'AL 1, r 1[ :C.: 623 Vacant 6-lson •n >-•n 806 McGinn Edw M G AL rk,�{,K - 6-/6T0 y � Z F'�i�' 629 Overton Francis 718 Carlson Donald E BA i ts 6-T703 �� ra 831 Pnvnlc Jacob bemt Overton Mary Mrs ' 6-'1430 M 807 Church Vernal D,O AL 337 Alloway Ernest E - 829Vacnnt 724 Moclta C ry 00° BA 6-069904 63042 ,i 339 Gaspar'Natallnl Mn G 7th av Intersects 1 !� 2: 812 Winn Merlin AL$- I* AL&3863708 803 B�8788 Donald J O AA N 6 iloyr_ 81E Vacant O 3395�Engeland Wayne ! 712 Pleroll Emilia Mrs B04 Jcrke Christine Mn BA N {A9. '04 4th av Intersect. 6-0937 • 816 Jelly Wm R 0 AL 5.6w1M t724 Rlftoro Aug P G t.�.a 'Y • •�1 820 Ru recht Phillip H® -: 400 B rin brook Hen807 Bingham Ira M O'AL • Pp p , P B lag CoOo 7E0 Rllforo Aug P Jr O '� AL o-a329 { AL 6-5242 AL 63187 yy;;r n 826 Ba111nq MarJorl4)<[n rM c� 'fir 1•Plant A F O 't' ''° 730 Lan or Joseph J O AL' 810 Adams Glen R G AL 6�284 =0 s- i A 6 4 i���� 40fi Dnvles Burton S O AL gg s 830 Cheney y8 Grant W d AL h.�.' ` - 53882 - „ . 6-7272 '• - 811 Polrler John O AL 5-6670 ` �^ u•, 409 Cochrane Geo O • 740 CaAnILp 6z391102 oats Mn• 812 E 6�3+7 a Wm T O AL 876 Lewis Rose E Mn AL !` ' 434 Chow Jimmie T HA 6-a5f)t • 742 Schumacher Alchd O' ' ' 815 Brinkerhoff Aleda U 0 I • 63015 435 Cook Dorothy R Mn• AL ii767.,. ,._ AL 6-8747 _�� - 6Iq Oottaa tity�N®AL bf435 AL FH74 -`:�1t 41.'ti,n:4'' Rl.J1.•u's} �..�� r13DlrL`!K.-. t ham: ylfy, 5 q.. _ • .�;, 1.,. _ 1 • 1 • , • lei _ - , i • • i .. CENTER MOTEL RENTON COLLECTION BUREAU ENCLOSED HEATED POOL COLLECTIONS ANYWHEFIE NO COLLECTION NOCHARGE PHONE 255-1401 5t,ttr+.r • S.3d Street Rent. . «]feat A •Silt, 24,P.O.Sex 272 (911055) 255d231 a� 132 1" f .+ P A`I a.- t: 1 2000 Neuner Rudy E 0 2;1q • •AV S—Contd S 8TH ST INTERSECTS 1"'Q 271-0883 2001 Panache Stein 0 Raker #stern %1 - 1'c' 600 Hubert Wm H 6 BA8-1533 171.1822 2005 Peckinino Robt BA& ' • David 0 '.. 601 Cole Theo C ® ALS-6634 t( r 2009 Ellis John M 0 BAbOq 1WShan Flora R OO 3.'! 608 Padroza Henry 0 = e� •4338 611 Mc Elwain D N L5-7682 jertmento �.-...(0 621 Billmeyer Byron R BA6.53P1 � i —• CAPRI AV NE—FROM IM Frank 623 Smith Annie Mrs BA65193 MONTEREY DR SOUTH yoaley Steve 629a Vacant fjCl p illnern R C 629b Vacant !•^a '= rG"' ZIP CODE 98055 +ITsser Kenneth 629t6 Vacant -an • • O 104 No Return 41KS Ron 630t Whitehouse R M e 21 1 x 110 Martin Merlin F 0&wig iisrah Anna G Mrs 0 , S 7TH ST INTERSECTS .v`f•r .% CD 8"624.4 111 t Mist John 0 ?.11I8107 708 Erickson Merrill D 2s. 56-7440 117 Williams Clarence S s (sigvo Kath N Mrs 0 3 g L) 802 Flahary Dsnl S BA8-1056 F3 i req.. AL55156 7,.*L64570 806 Ril ero Aug P Jr OO AL63187 ., ! = 122 Wagner Harold H 0 gaaWy Donna ?-.it/ 810 a Halberg Michl 298-7318 E. ("Ca AL55410 leant -;- 7 814 Vacant i C„' AL•5-2860 123 Donnelly Wm D © A16Nat alini Cagan Mrs 42 !1 7 818f Arriola Dino O tL5-6356 128 Aliment Frank Lee O AU-3853 1' 0 ALS2633 ;!Dailey Edw F Jr 129 Connell Robt L 0• AL = *snot CEDAR RIVER PARK—FROM e• 3 134 Barron Bernard L O ICS ST INTERs,pers MAPLE VALLEY RD EAST L 135 Butler Bob G 0 27L1011 Rite Melvin 7�� OF CMSTP& PRR TRACKS 140 Stone Win R 0 tDaviea Burton K 0 AL5-3882 r.ry . A65225 141 Rockhill Randall 0 MAW Wen John F 0 BA6-0309 4 7 ZIP CODE 98055 147 Jay Gilbert C 0 AL5.85111 ' larlahire Wm G AL5-1836; • 100 City Pub Library 235-2610 24 150 Holmes Jay E 0 ALS7W •• Dorothy R Mrs 0 MIA C M 1 153 Loomis Royal C 0 AL64 IB Q 3I65374 • 19TH ST •• Stanley S 0 AL&-6385 DAVIS AV 8—FROM B 15TH OF III ..# .•.. uz M Mrs ST SOUTHEAST 1 WEST OF 111 A CARR RD(ALSO KNOWN AA ,r•,- ;Azelio 255-4348 SHATTUCK AV 8 8 179TH ST}—FROM 10411 .1 • `Geo E 0 A 0 AV SE NORTHEAST 2 -McDonald S J 0• 228-2228 ZIP OODE 98055 :A62960 SOUTH OF SE 174TH ST ' •:••paon Vert 0 Al5-4947 1503 Carlson Jerry J 321 k • "Prudence Mrs 0 1506 Campbell Maude D Mrs 9,1 0 ' ZIP CODE 98055 If,A156275 ALS-7652 = = 10435 Kerstetter Glen ® • Ernest J 0 BA6-9639 1509 Jane Ernest A 0 AL5-423712 IL-256J AL56613 1..!: Sr INTERSECTS 1514 Slyter Roy L 6 ALS8509 4011* ewe 10600 Real Estate One Hun44 ' • Mark L 1617 Wicks Nick J 0 AL67604 s.. A gis 24 10645 Vacant - •.hErturn 1521 Wicks Robt W 0 AI5-0647 Pe•c 1 x ' tirih- 1530 Arso1a John A 6 AL6-3835 •ei CD CDC l9TH 8'l' Al •rdejJoan 1603 Scott Gary R BA8.6988 at cr. • OF CEDAR AV 8—FROM 17018 !lalbsn Amelia P Mrs 0 1608 Moses Geo E 0 ALS3319 a'j = n SD ST SOUTH _ •t' 1609 Wade Robt A 0 a sys r. v. ••-•t 1615*Worley Agnes L Mrs 0 ZIP()ODE 98055 _,*cant 255-7645 g 0 4D k8906 907 Walt Edw J AL6779 ' a' rt•Aobt 1616 Smith Philip C 0 ALS-5518 a2i VI 3 908 Grinolds Manly M 0 men Lloyd A 0 AL5-2060 1621 Hughes Harland H 0 aaa0rs CD ALS-7070 a0mer Earl H 6 AL66078 BA64097 ss� 909 Anderson Margt Mrs• • 'Jim 0 BA&-9781 1622 Wilson Ernest B 0 =s pis ALS-3764 }}_�..�.'7 John C 0 BA6-3337 BA63998 0 0 310 4 Sweeney Timothy `!eaer Dennis 0 1707 Conatantine Wm A O = = 2cc Rnuo 813 Rogers Merle M Mrs rr Marry Mrs 0 ALb2826 AL68556 ' i'- •28 1713 Psulman Peter J 6 0 816 Anderson Leroy W i ' • ••Winford K 228-4870 AL67361 = 0 i-0618 AL67424 .4 t1 • Gilbert bldg oontr 1716 White Carl J ® BA6-8548 L r '1 1972 POLK DIRECTORY { f. to ,1 w,• 'r•J• . a -. . • =!;' •^v. "•.fit_,,, . e ^`f 1 .X✓ 0 \r l.c S'ly'4,, ,. J h ':! • • • a ) .y,. r- r •T,'y.• •• Y 4^• f, •t.w'77 ;0.`3 •- • .... Y_:` dSDri r, ■ • • RENTON COLLECTION BUREAU COLLECTIONS ANYWHERE �,o NO COLLECTION NO CHARGE i�' . • - SIM(E I f.) 22?Williams A Saito 24, P.O. tor 272 (98055 L"255•t23f. I .� 133 OI0 (WAR AV S--Coned S 6TH ST INTERSECTS 317 No Return 600 Hubert Wm H O BA8-1533 .. • >Cl t Abbey David OO 601 Cole Theo C O AI.5•6634 as .�r •. 324 Monaghan Flora R Mrs 0 608 Pedrou Henry 0 = a _ • . AL64824 611 Mc Elwain D i w Cr - 336 Apartments 621 Billmeyer Byron R BA65323 ! - 1 Toth Frank 629 Smith Annie Mrs BA6-6193 3 Q 2t Donley Steve 629a Vacant 11 t CM S Brown R C 629b Vacant CI = M ' 4 4 Teeper Kenneth 62914 Vacant o H = 1G" -` • . 6 t Tits.Ron 630 4 Whitebouse R M o 33 .. = f . 327 Novack Anna G Mrs OO S 7TH ST INTERSECTS "1 • CD 1.6 - A8107 708 Erickson Merrill I) .J > • 330 Fulgosi Kath N Mrs € 802 Flahary Danl S BA8-1056 53 a • • AL5-4570 806 Riffero Aug P Jr ® AL53187 y 3 = ' _• Hi*Bentley Donna 810 t Halberg Michl 228-3318 5 (Mt -V - • . 337 Vacant 814 Vacant ? 339 Gaspari Natalini Mrs O 818*Arriola Dino C n ' t Dailey Edw F Jr 12 • - Vacant CEDAR RIVER PARK—FROM t - - ',,y . 5 4TH ST INTERSECTS MAPLE VALLEY RD EAST •4304 White Melvin OF CMSTP &PRR TRACKS 401 Davies Burton K O AL5-3882 ;..; .• 409 Rodgers John F ® BA6-0309 ZIP CODE 98055 414 Berkshire Wm G ALS-1836 100 City Pub Library 235-2610 l' ' . . 415 Cook Dorothy R Mrs 6 m H C E>.I ALS-6374 18 419 Nelson Stanley S ® AL64385 DAVIS AV S—FROM S 16TH e.1, 420 Lamoreus M Mrs ST SOUTHEAST 1 WEST OF IICfQ �' 422 t Grs.ai Aselio 2554348 SHATTUCK AV S CD 05 Matthai Geo E O CD1:1 ! A 4261 Mc Donald S J 0228-2228 ZIP CODE 98055 432 Thompson Vera 0 AL54947 1503 Carlson Jerry J N 0 433 Romiti Prudence Mrs OO 1506 Campbell Maude D Mrs V - AL6-6275 AL67652 .,. 3s-, t , 435 Large Ernest J OO BA6.9639 1509 Jane Ernest A O AL54237 O S 6TH ST INTERSECTS 1514 Slyter Roy L 0ALS-8509 m 103 Farbanks Mark L 1517 Wicks Nick J tD ALS-7604 CD 101 No Return 1521 Wicks Robt W OO AL5.0647 ' N'cr - .:..5. 104 Vacant 1530 Auola John A OO AI S-a1t45 's'1a A C b3 t Wade Joan 1603 Scott Gary R BA8-6988 �. a 101 Talbert Amelia P Mrs® 1608 Magee Goo E O AL6-3.319 a ;n :rt1. ,• 'Y :ALS3624 1609 Wade Robt A � a d 101 Viaoant 1615*Worley Agnes L Mrs a — tr".,�, t011i-Vacant 255-7645 fs2 `3� 119 A Dark Robt 1616 Smith Philip C ® AL6-5518 a (I) •x 125 Telken Lloyd A ® ALS-2060 1621 Hughes Harland H O CD 126 Clymer Earl H ®AL5•6078 BA64097 d n 323 Sewell Jim 0 BA69781 1622 Wilson Ernest B O ews•= 129 Murphy John C® BA6-3337 BA63998 O CO "t 1132 Koelker Dennis 40 1707 Constantine Woo A OO = = -..+' t ' 615 Cross.n Margy Mr. ® ALE-2826 .j -. . . .. BA63628 1713 Paulman Peter J 00 4.4. • l I:.-1 •T ,'•.� - 339 Moore W inford K 228-4870 AL5.7361 Fraser Gilbert bldg oontr 1716 White Carl J ® BA6 .548 4,� - < NO A 4 i 1972 POLK DIRECTORY • .: .. . . .•'.. .. , . ,.; t ... ,•••,. �- •• . s4 . 7 • • 3 � y .. ..: • . . ., .. .,i . • . .,. , . . ..1_,.,..$.... .,.. ....,.;...,.,..„. .. • . . . . . ,. . , . • . • :• . . . . . . , . . , , . • • . • • 4'r._a`.Fi+ .14'-?.4::1f. S�. • c rr. .ii .., j3 .,.: •I'• ., •' • * • - •4 • ,. �a aa. }4 .mot c 1K•'ti.,•yf •'ry ?J! `.rat i - f • - C $4 : .. •~T K:�,t . • ♦ _ LLr,, ,r p h ' ' . . i• rT , I • .1, — RENTON • HUB INSURANCE AGENCY RENTON W1il'�.Y ,rr,-... C e=-;' i "p%= PHONE ALpin4t S-24I NO( Ironsaa Way and Park As.N. Ronfon 98055) 222 Williams A , o Wf„ i.•. 138 N„. 0 it'^�s 422 No Return DAVIS AV 8—FROM = F,o CARR RD(ALSO KNOWN AS 425 t Matthai Geo E 0ST SOUTI AST 1 W N =3 8 179TH 8T?—FROM 104TH 426 Rooney Roy H 0 SHA.rrUcK AV S W c`_ AV SE NORTHEAST 2 432 Thompson Vare O A154947 • s . SOUTH OF 8E 174TH ST 433 Romiti Prudence Mrs 0 • ZIp CaCODE 98065 o :-` ZIP CODE 98055 435►Large Ernest J 0 BA6-9639-.1`• 1503 rlson Jerry J w 1506 Campbell Maude D :: ` 10435 Kerstetter Glen ® S 5TH ST INTERSECTS AL5-7652 �. ALb 6613 500♦Farbanks Mark L 1509 Jane Ernest A ® / 4i•� 10600 Real Estate One Hundred 501 t Williams Preston E O ,r a 10545 Vacant 504 Vacant 1514 Slyter Roy L @ AI I!i'� 1517 Wicks Nick J 0 A s 505 t Phraner Thesenvit: 1521 Wicks Robt W O ' 12 508 Telban Amelia P Mrs ® 1530 Azzola John A O • - 411 • CEDAR AV 8—FROM 1201 8 ALS.,36u 3D ST SOUTH 509 Birkland Jeraldine Mrs O 1608 MosesScote Gary R S i. ' BA62612 1608 Wm H O A CI ZIP CODE 98056 50954*Wright Thalma 1609 Wade Robt A O 307 Walt Edw J ® AL5.7707 518 Vacant '- 1615 Jensen James J O a� r i 1616 Smith Philip C O° js f, Eli i 308 Grano s10Nanly M O 519*Saint Pierre Kenneth TA 1621 Hughes Harland h / "`"' `•~ • 525 Telken LloydA O AL5-2060 i1 ;`:°1 Y E 909 Anderson Margt Mr O Earl BA6-4097 `. ♦ 0"*,4 ALS•9764 526 Clymer Earl H 49 AL6a078 :' 1622 Wilson Ernest B C 528 Sewell Jim ®BA8-9781 • 310 Cale Wm 271-0169 529 Murphy John C BA63337 `•�- BA6-3998 313 Rogers James R 6AI.548556 1707 Constantine Wm P 532 Kcelker Dennis 0 '' AL5 2826 316 Anderson Leroy W ® _ AL5•7424 535 B��rgy Mrs OO '; 1713 Paulman Peter J , U) 317 t Draeger Candice Mrs 639 Moore Winford K 228d8T0 1 AL5-7361 Z 321 Nygaard Faye OO '{4. 1716 White Carl J O F „ 540 Ford Gilbert bldg oontr 924 Monaghan Flora R Mrs OO 1T17 Tegantvoort Victo, • AL5�824 S 6TH ST INTERSECTS ALS 2889 +• . w- Q 600 t Hubert Wm H 0 SA8-1533 ' i �..` 326 Apartments L. 1722 Katxr Danl F OO a 1►Toth Frank 661 Cole Theo C el AIS 5G34 r' 1725 Katzer Melvin E ! 4u Henry AI5-8130 s L' 7 FEN 2*Ayer Julie 3 4 Brown R C22C 61111 M�rroyDuward K -t 1728 Hansel Kenneth '., W C« 4*Anderson W 226-7880 621 Billmeyer Byron R BA8S321"- , BA6 6672 ' A 5 Vacant ye yr° 1801 Mathisen Lance I •'*' 4a .0 J: 623 Smith Annie Mr.BA6.6193 E« 327 Novack Anna G Mrs 0ALS2091 A d AL5.8107 629a Vacant :'S• J 1805 Javelli Joseph V } C C 330 Fulgoei Kath N Mrs 0 629b Vacant i AL5-9783 • ' 7 AIS4370 62955 Vacant -. 1813 Fairclough Ernest ''.' 1, O " 331 Vacant 690 Vacant •" ti 1814 Vacant ,..2 . 337 t Park Ual D 2284243 S 7TH ST INTERSECTS . fite _•. 1819 Howell Harry C 339 Gaspari Natalini Mrs 0 708 Erickson Merrill D ,°t'�j 0. I. A7.5-38b3 802 4 Flahary Dad S BA8-1066 :. • • Vacant 806 Rifler*Aug P Jr o AL5318T.• . DAYTON AV NE—I » •.; Vacant 810 Vacant ;:,n;• .• 5TH PL NORTHWI ." a C r S 4TH ST INTERSECTS 814 Vacant EAST OF EDMONI .3. 400 Vacant 818 Dehaven Ken • • j C a 404 Davies Burton K ® AL5-3882 �'" ZIP CODE 98055 - '- .0 3 6 409*Rodger John F 6BA6-0309 ' ?"• 650 Nyhusmoen Arnol VI 7 • 7 414 Berkshire Wm G AL61836 CEDAR RIVER PARK—FRONT e W a p 41454 4 Kemper Kevin MAPLE VALLEY RD EA.4T 651 Jensen Max R O >,« as 415 Cook Dorothy R Mr O OF CMSTP a: PRR TRACKS ','..• 654 South NancyMrs CC AI56974 j:.a -: 655 Walsh Patk J O ' r • 419 Nelson Stanley S ® ALS-8385 ZIP CODE 98055 _• 658 4 Heating Bob O I • 0 420*Iamoreua M Mrs 100 City Pub Litrary 235-2610 i • • a 1973 POLK DIRECTORY }Y :s Ott, A A • • �,�� o`r t ` ,••, ' ,y• y` -SS ; 1111 `-r• 137 John C OO �n 21 432 Thompson d ere O 255 4947 " '" taA O 11 17Y'1•H ST}--FROM 104TH . 25�275rudence Mn 0 "'�' V SE NORTHEAST 2 * .�7 PCH OF SE 174TH ST 435 Large Alice G Mn Op to 24 226 9639 t" c —FROM 1 .•i CODE 98055 S W1 ST INTEILSE�-15 cn j OF SE 19TH ST I. #Win H A "1 G' Kerstetter Glen O 255-6613 501 No Return 1 EAST OF23 PL SE INTERSECTSm • 1V SE Reif Estate One Hundred 504 Vacant m 605#Staaluefvicr Joseph 226 6709 -1 (— -226-120065 508 Telban CID ` Bobo Rocket Station gas eta Amelia P Mrs p r^ v E'''' CD eonard 226-2960 C : 2265413509 255,3624 m a Ben J OO �, •- Winchell's Donut House Vacant —1 I 255-9162 525 Tel veno Louis R OO 2554492 r' ! R 2285956 525 Telken Lloyd A O 255-2060 "r it T O 2562567 526 Clymer Earl H O 255-6078 A V S_ 12 528 Sewell Jim OO 2269781 PIP FROM 1201 S 529 Murphy John C H 2263337 —FROM 1 Z< . ST SOUTH 532 Kcelker Dennis H k� OF SE 19TH 3T 1' CODE 98055 535 Cro6-an Margy Mrs O 1 WEST OF Walt Fdw J OO 2557707 539 Moore 22636W tD IS Grinolds Manly M O S 6TH ST INTERSECTS C I' 255 7070 ECIS o ,5 Anderson Margt Mn 0 600 Hubert Wm H 0 228-1533 n• I S O 228 O91)6 • ,ii3764 601 Cole Theo C pO 2 O mld J © Sweeney Timothy 228588E 608 Pedrosa Henry p Q t •Rogers Merle M Mrs Oo 611*Roche Merril ., eI lex E O . 255-8556 621 er Byron R 226-5323 rt — •Anderson I�my O 623 Smith Annie Mrs 226-5193 • ,ayne O :2557424 630 Whitehouse R M { ! MOO 255-5088 Vacant S 7TH ST INTERSECTS 0 'ry A Abbey David O 708#Giger Riley O 226-5312 „-. . i C Mrs 802 Vacant ]Monaghan Flora R Mrs O 806 Riffero OO 255-0618 2S 4824 Aug P Jr OO 255 3187 $ ~� > i E O 271-0730 t, ltpartments 810 Vacant y 818 w 1-errs, t n OO 226-0317 �:•'•Journce Kenneth 818#1fawase Chrn��322g..0699 -� ' �b®2 2 5 ¢.3" vens Barbara L 255.9355 PIP Vaunt 12 CD m 1�� '':_ CEDAR RIVER —FROM n -FROM 180 14 t INorack Keiser Anna G Mn O MAPLE VALLEY RD EAST `, a , S. R SOUTH T. 8107 OF CMSTP& PRR TRACKS co ►�.a1 1 `-- 1_+?WPC 70 N Mrs O rn I.r• 'i II •, ZIP CODE 98055 t`1 l 7; '`' 9`N 5529 p Rocky 1295p4�r 100 City Pub Library 235 2610 "' F O 255-1093 Wit. City Lib Bd ! j} i N'y hd 235-0222 •Natahm Mrs OO � t' Y, nce S O 17 Z I.r�!,. ''''f'' DAVIS AV S— i •t-f/'rf-r " Diane FROM S 14TH /� e/7 1.'•es. i H O 255-5410 Fr` t"u Frank ST SOUTHEAST 1 WEST OF , + 1 - D 0 255-1916 CS sr 1NTERSECIS SHATFUCK AV S Lee ! ' elem 98055 =, b�' Burton K O ZIP CODE • '°Deers Jo 226-0309 1503 Vacant ^^` • d O p 726 °rk Dan�2 gq 1i� I�Maude D Mn o r 0 271-1013 Dorothy R Mrs C11255 -� 1609 Jane Ernest A Z r-r n Stanley1514 Slyter Roy255 4237 m C;'4 O 2551s569168 i re K 0 0 2263271 255.6385 1517 Wicks Nick J O j 55,9509 N • p 2557 69 Asalio @ 255.4348 1530 Axso a 1521 Wicks John A 0 255-0647 ib tJ 2555427 •'���J ® 22g2�,6 1603 Scott Gary R 228.6988 p ', 1608 Moses Geo E OO 2b5 3319 •:I 'y 44 k, 1975 POLK DIRECTORY f 13i�.- • . �. 4 Ir *+! f I 4 ! !i , - • r yyWW�11'^•fd'r E{Av 1 tI:"ice S' f C ♦ \ r v -1976- • ^� ESTABLISHED 0841 F • I//%�/,�� ((//�62, ,_,/�r� ,� r _bUfl V Fado144r.G(, .. C Credo Rep ^Sen�cef FOR THE PROMOTION AND O PROTECTION OF TRADE 1 . . Commerc.o Raring) - ;I a PUBLICATIONS AND SERVICES FOR MANAGEMENT 1/16 fifth Avenue Building, Second Floor,P.O.Box 12600, Seattle 98111 - hone 623-088( 734 ' G •6M 823 317*Sher nos or . rci CAMBRIDGE CT(KENT)-FROM 16529 CAPRI AV NE(RENTON)-FROM 160 221 Abbey David• sr CAMBRIDGE DR NORTH MONTEREY DR SOUTH 324 Monaghan Fiore B Yrs•Y55.4824 • if) ZIP CODE 98031 ZIP CODE 98055 836 Apartments Ur) ZIP Vacant • CV 3901 Johnson Edwin A 6 854- 468 0 104 Pierre Frank C 226Sb29 2 Tirrusti lain -- 3903 Bartknwski Joe 6 852-6930 110 Martin Merlin F 6 255.1093 3 Vacant 3904 Mittlestadt Gerold W•852 m 9048 III Decaple Richd 235-0222 4 K .Gso - 3911 Erdahl Lloyd 854-0471 116*Siremore J P 6 Keiser Christine M 3912 Neher Richd M 6 8640753 . 117 William Clarence S• 256-5156 40I'H AV$INTERSECTS -122 Wagner Harold H •2.666410 827 Novick Am G Mrs• 1 4A : 123 Donnelly Dorothy E Mrs 6 2651916 330 Fulgoni N 1lrs•2564570 • Bpi 128 Aliment love Mn• 266-2633 M 1f8K l Phillips.Rocky L 606 .. CAMBRIDGE DR(KENT)-FROM 3622 129 Connell Robt L 6 2653726 337 Patrick Fred HAMPTON WAY EAST 134 Barron Bernard L• 399*Sayre Ann 135 Butler Bob G 6 271.1013 • Muss Frank • O .. ZIP CODE 98031 140 Stone Wm R• • - S 4TH ST INTERSECTS o. Z • 26402 Nslaon Wm H 6 854-5760 141 Rockhill Randall 6 25b.9143 400 Vacant 26403 Hurwitz Don P 6 db23657 147 Jay Gilbert C 6 2556569 404 Davis.Burton K• 2553882 y 26405 Corey Patk J O 8545279 ISO Holmes Jay E 6 255-7484 • - 409 Rodgers John P 64 2260309 y * - 26407 Gustafson Floyd C 6 854-2711 163 Loomis Royal C 6 2664477 414*Buckley F D 26410 Waldo..Roger R 8524015 636 416 Cook Dorothy-ItYn•265-6374 26414 Parkins Dean 6 852-9338 - 419 Nelson Stanley S 0 2554385 26420 Isaacson Donald J 6 852-6676 CARR RD(RENTON)(ALSO KNOWN420 Kenneth Keane •226J'171 Z 26421 Ray Guy 6 854-1975 AS S 1T9TH ST)-FROM 194TH AV 422 Grassi Aulio 6 2566348 2W26 Wilson Durward E 6 854.0431 SE NORTHEAST 2 SOUTH OF SE 425 Mitchel Gov E• 1114 26429 Degeberg Kenneth L m 8527089 174TH SF j2g Vacant - +1 26430 Muailh ma Ma M ® 8626873 ZIP CODE 98055 432 Thompson Ye O•2654647 r CD 26513 Hancock Harold 6 85a-3959 n 26516 Varro Darlene M 6 854-3193 10435 Kerstetter Glen 6 2656613 433 Roeriti Prudence Mrs•2656276 a 26519 Steinberg J M Photo Journalist 105TH PL SE INTERSECTS 475 large Alice G Mrs•2369639 .. 654-4839 10500 Real Estate One 2261200 S 5TH ST INTERSECTS Steinberg Jay M 6 B54J839 10545 Robo Rocket Station gas eta 226.6413 600 Wingard H A 271-31M 26520 Bergstrom Robt 6 8521743 10622 Wiochell's Donut House 256.9162 501*Taster John 26525 Koller Roberta J Mrs O 852-2751 604 Vacant r 26528 Sch)aeppi Lauren K 6200 605*Dswkine Fred y CAMBRIDGE CT INTERSECTS CARTER PL(KENT').PROM 1 NORTH 506 Talban Amalie figni•266.3624 � • V6rg O OF 811 VAN DE-VANTER AV biT9 Vaunt _ Z SOUTH IN A CUL D6 SAC 693 509 Vacant Trevino Ionic It 355-4192 CANTERBURY LA(KENT)-FROM 2 625 Telken Lloyd A•2652060 ZIP CODE 98031 Fy NEST OF 2i1400 MILITARY RD EAST 807 Crown Glen B® 852-9159 526 Clymer Earl H•2564076 La CODE 98031 808 Buck S M 6 862.0345 528 Sewell Jams.R• 226-9781 w 814 Cunningham Ken 628 Murphy John CO?�r73: ICC /g PRINCETON AV INTERSECTS 615 Womack Evens D 6 8529409 Dennisorlkar Dr • C/� W 3516 Erskine Nancy Mn 854-1927 819 Kent Dennis J•6625274 � r'p'n Ma Mrs 6 226-36 28 v. Y/ 3517 Scholtee Glen J 6 B54-3696 820*Demor Paul 6 • 639 Moore Wintord K •228-4870 3525 Nelson Edwin •85-1280 822 Fenster Construction led coots - S tiT}I ST INTERSECTS I: 3526 Seiler Marguerite Mn 6 652-7719 O 3531 F[ielmeland Richd 6 854-2924 852-3737 600 Vaunt 3531 Teague Garland L 6 854-2413 Fenster Garry 6 662-8737 - 601 Ped Theo C•265-6694- .. M 3540 fltrda labs F 6 854-4366 606 Pedroa Henry•_ O.. W - 3541 Mc Broom James 6 852-1197 • :" GOO 611 Roche Marilyn' r . 3547 Ruppert Ralph E 6 8523502 CARTER ST(KEN'I)--FROM 800 VAN 621 Bil(meyer Syron R 2265323 _ W • _ DE VANT'ER AV WSW_Y•.. • 623 Smith Annie Mrs 2265193 3548 Griffith Albert E m 8529116 dk.• '' • • A 3605 Kapp Roman J •6525114 . ZIP CODE 98031 .• '-..,crew' 6 S Williaeu iTERu--T �• w 602 Mc Fadden S 7TH BT INTF3iSEC15 ....-- . . - s. um Gary •1W1N1 'i- -:' 708 No IiaWra- CANYON DR(KENT-FROM 9000 •.,-1,.r.ree. L. r•I!It rcc--n p8 802 Yecant:.•.yid_:: . . :e.l in ' RENT-BLACK DIAMOND RD,.,r, CASCADE AV 8-CIV[WI1.AF- N I• wr. 306 No R0220 ,I- C SOUTHEAST'• _ - _1 -�.; Tr.J.: OF WITH AV 8(BD(ALSO KNOWN :••310 Vacant -L's:-.• 'r;. Cie) . • a AS WEST VALLEY-HWT):'F.w..a;. 814 Vacant. r -'.f ' �: r/t 1267PCan Do Crest Apartment9. A`: - • rN.•F' r..,.- A.'� 919 Vague -/ --Cl teas _ ir-+s r.K Cp :3;.:-;.: ZIP CODE 98188 -.-.. •AP•- -- •. t CC O *Fowler S 18351 Champion Office Product'31M999- •'�--�,•,' .rnS I--s -.•.il I' I• - TC 1*Webb G _ t ..:-.:r,l/•? 18365 Tiles Inc jape moms seMelaa'• CEDAR DR SE fAUBUtM-TROY I: Fy• ._trl ac 2*Wilkerson L .'' -- _•_ ' 261-6290 - :1160 F BT SE LAST .. I. .0 - 3*Hall C N - - 18393 Goldsmith Inc whol dry p.ds - i :,2 Vj 4*ffike D A - --- 6760791 r ZIP CODE 92022 - --5 6*Johnaon S • • ' 18401 Uoiatrut Northwest stall se'3615130 80 ey 1 Blaken Relph"Y•633.471 - N S 6*Sahli J 18409 General Cable Corp•261.5213 602 Gregory Paul 930-1262 ' • 7*Jooes C 16441 Sento et.whol fastener.6760950 g08 Vaunt `! * v 8 Maxwell Ruth - ••• 16449 Union 76(Whss)2237221 604 Pickett Hymns H♦8330 - .. 693 9*Campbell B - - 9003 Hillside Clinic 8626650 , MO 606 Oswald Jim 833.8209 , 406 Sheppard Geo R•6359289 13 Bates Darrell C phys 652-5650 .. CEDAR AV 8(RENPONF-FROM 1201 c 807 Baker James E•633-1687 q 6005 Gpoto Jacqueline L 8 3D HT SOUTH 9009*Peterson Robt 208 Lewin Ahrin G•6234246 Vs; ••1013 Chopp Father Mn•-8641173-+'----LIP-CODE-99066 -----•-. . "___•701 Steinberg Edw_1_1117 833.50.68 �.- ' 9016 No Return e 307 Walt Ed J•266-7707 i 7 702 Sutton Travis C• i 'N - 9017 Vacant �';' ;:308 Grinolde Manly 3E•:26670I0 11' 703 Costanich Margt A •M3-3124 • ,t • 9031 Doherty John T 0 8527796--� CO.' 309 Vacant s s- o c A' r: F a.t 704.1ay Warms T•233.1149 .'5 1 9404 Hudg+no Paul G•252-0137 310 Taylor Charlie - 705 Larson Harold A•6335248 0 r 9440 As.embly Of Cod Church 652-4373 '313 Rogers.Merle M Mrs 41/9SSi7 r• ')706 Fecker Florence I Mrs• 6351889 .1 -4n f t *Barnum Delmar Rev 6524120 03,316 Anderson•troy W�,2667434T 1 fie. 707 Johnson Harvey 0•6221561 1977 POLK DIRECTORY K-.r✓+,_' ; rest • 7•• - • . 1ik7 . . RENTON AVENUE SOUTH two 4 Memo to JRI from Michele June 19, 1978 Page 3 RENTON AVENUE SOUTH (south of S. 3rd St. intersection) 1963-1977: Street addresses increased by 2 during this period: There are no apartment units indicated.. A partial breakdown follows. The street numbers on our xerox copies for 1972 and 1975 are illegible. 1963 7ir300 block = 14 (330 lists one occupant and then goes on to say "rear is vacant": This block also includes one address at 333 1/2) * 400 block 12 (Includes one address at 420 1/2) 500 " = 11 600 " = 7 700 " = 16 800 " = 2 62 1972 Most of this is illegible, but I count 64. 1973 p300 block = 14 (326 is new and 337, which was vacant in 1963, is no longer listed) M'400 " = 11 (413, which was vacant in 1963, is no longer listed) • 500 " = 12 (535 is new) 600 " = 7 • 700 = 9 (It would appear that the same 800 = 8 renumbering that occurred on 900 = 2 Cedar Avenue also took place here) 63 • 1975 Again, most of this is illegible, but I count 63. 1977 /r300 block = 14 71r400 " = 11 500 " = 13 (508 is new since 1973. ) • • m 600 = 7 700 = 9 800 " = ' 8 (812 is new since 1973; 814 no longer listed) 900 " = 2 • 64 / ,a ■a.y••, I Vr•e.��•• .� •►�.���� mends Information FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP Seattle's Accepted Newspaper can ue•t In l:. 123 3d Ave. I TELEPHONE MAin 2-0300 I All The h1 t Your Ren}on ALpine 5-3451 Comfort• of Rainier Av—ContdS 118th Intersects Boma ,,,I 805 Bonnell Nurauflua AI.6-4680 Rul¢lor Av S--Contd " Fingertips! Williams S C optom BA 16 11439 Bryn Mawr Beauty Shop 11809 Bryn e Mawr Tavern PA 0-2323 Grady way Intersects PA 8-0060 Zale's Jwlrs AL 62501 9th uv 8 Intersectp 12 OTT WITHIN A OTT ' 307 Almo Furn Renton Inc BA Cap's Barber 8ho T. of Thou. 11441 Lakeview Apartments RENTON—From 1600 IId av Irer, sands of p•opl• 315 Firestone6-0 Stores(br)Auto RAINIER AV NORTH—Front 6 2a Johnson Irene D PA south j • who w•rs br- parts BA 6-0900 54 Rainier av north 3-0159 300 Reid Walter P O AL 5-3802 �yyyy,,��1 �, m•.ly uronq•rs 329 Miller Max Garage auto 101 Jack's Airport Sery gas AL 2b Fuqua Dee L 630 Arnone Sammy J O AL [��,i:• .tit to the City 0,,oc- rcprs AL 5-166a 69831 2d Swift Layne LindaP Barbara A � S31 Trlmm Wm C O AL 59860 $$a.��`•_ tory or• conwit- rear Miller Max L O 103 Arbuckle Clans Co AL 5-8629 2e Stark Marjorie Mns PA 3L6 Dalaurentl Frank G AL • ,. . Mg a on qws• 330 Buildatt'sers Union Sery AL 5-9060 106 Macready Lew TBA whol auto 3-0311 6-7006 1 .•I eons of dr�s•n- 401 Bu-8297 Mart bldg sups AL ;1 M bg parts BA 6-3100 9b Vacant Gerard 319 Maltlla Arne W 5)AL 6T399 v. •mocoy- 111 Northwest Truck Si,BA • •� m•^c Norlinder Arnold 6-3111 Sc Vacant 320 Bardalraon Baird M C' so"'c•r of 411 Reiman Auto Parts Co whol 315 Dan's Auto Sery Street continued a29332,19 29 Llltle Geo O AL 67387 ,� '.i wpoly.commune- BA 6-2666 S ( moon,•u. Aqo, 416 Motor Mart auto repn AL Mathewson's Shell Serv,BA 11443 Econ-O-Wash The self 330 White Robt E rfi BA 6-5246 +'� r� 8-2985 serve rear Vacant D�r•c•o so • Mathewson's Rainier Tire 11448 Lake Shore Manor Motel j= • i u; n, 9 5-T722 333 Bunstlne Edw AL 67689 i cs u� Kenny's Auto Rebuild • c' among AL 5-5435 Co BA 6-2965 May 2-3755 d L 0 PA 333chThary Margt Mrs O AL regular wa.u.b- 439 Yonker Sam Auto Si,used Rainier Trailer Rental5-4344 2-3755 337 Vacant • 11 i •'• cars AL 5-2651 300 Chamberlof Commerce BA 11449 Dave's Gro PA 2-9T70 338 Welch Win PAL 5-4093 r.'i More Younker Sam Auto&Truck 6-4560 S 115th pl Intersects 343 Mueller Werner W BA 6-3558 >+ 91s AL 5-2551 Ptoplt Art 447 Hse of Donuts AL 5-0717 18 11458 Johnson Felton PA 66503 405 Favro Henry OO a 1 IRAINIER AV S(PO Seattle)— 11465 Gray Allan M PA 5-8531 410 Knott Ralph F O AL 5-5116 CITY 0 Seeing 449 Moran's Drive-In restr34 rear Fagan Pete 411 Noble Robt B O AL 62463 U • ;•�c g CityAL From 8516 8 112th south • 1 Directory Ads 520 Bonnie''sestr AL 5-9284 11202 Warren Chas C PA 3-6&19 S 115th intersects 412 L,e�melster Raymond G AL •� _ ry 521 Auto City Inc used care BA 2105 11204 C2-hristensen Frank®PA 11486 Allen Emma M Mn PA 419 Vacant . ., 6-5280 CENTER W 530 Busy Bee Rental Toole 11207 Mathisen II..:vard A PA 11468 3-0514 m Melvin C PA 416 Schlosser Jack O'AL 5-0852 . I AL 5-0151 2-1344 5-3022 420 No return 416 Balzari¢i Lout C)AL 5-3378 MOTEL x Am Trailers rental AL 11214 3-8836 a Jack R.l7 PA 11468a Schmidt Ernestine Mrs �� g_8838 S 116th Intersects 420%Vacant la 5-0151 11600 Vacant 424 Storey Robt D a0 3 McCulloch Power Chain 11220 Nickles Wilson W O PA 11606 Clever Martin F 430 Maynlck Edw F O w 67648 W +i Anderson Your 1 II e S 3 s Saws AL 5-0151 11809 Burwell h Morford(br) 439 °o�+Zu Clarence M^_ wL 91 I 540 Band Box restr AL 69040 11230 Robt W O PA loans PA 67252 _ 604 Joes 19cBurgersg y Beacon sav intersectsrn I' • Q •� Lanes restr BA 5-4494 Epp con cv an Geo V AL 61752 P �D n n rats 11611 Cummin s Harold R Realty Spore k M M n 11232 Mulllken Jack C O PA pA 65546 • I y 606 Strata bowling alley LaVoya 11812 Barnette Beni T Q° PA' 5002 Vldmarnton® J d6AL0 6-3804 Bedroom rn • ( AL 5-1451 11234 Clem G PA 3-7061 3-2810 ri 631 AL skating rink AL 11236 Schaffer C E O' b09 Petchniek Sam O 65417 11620 Schaitel Robt •M O' Epp Saturnini Geo O AL 5-4109 • ,r S 113th intersect Peltier Jerry 11301 Why Gro PA 2-9836 11621 Mattison Carl V C)PA 515 Matko Louis O AL 5-8035 a i " ' Torgesen Thos A 11321 Bryn Mawr Chevron Sta 3-3476 523 Breda Raymond 1 AL 69T06 All-Weather "./� • 632 Renton Heating Oil Co AL PA 2-9384 11626 Barnhart Verrol S O PA 524 Overman Jai'A O AL 5-7215 5-1612 3-3348 528 Perala Hugo E 9 AL 5-3086 Enclosed 87th av S intersects Heated I Skyway Mtrs used cars 11629 Shook John 0 530 Stanley Edw DC)AL 5-2281 • - Skyway 6a 11326 Bryn Mawr Beach Mobile 11 Booth Harry L It PA 532 DeLuche Willard O AL 5-169 .'.� 835 Suburban Land Co real eat Court Trailer plc PA 5-6397 3-7655 606 Boisseau David W d9 AL Pool •• Barer John O A 6-6397 BA 6-Tru2212 S 14th Intersect S 117th intersects 5.3857 70T Seattle Trust 44 Sav Bank 11401 Milo's Cafe reatr PA 11707 Cooke Albert E O PA 610 Faull Thos Cl AL 5-3683 • -� ' • ' i ti- (Renton Br)AL 5-1591611 Cugini Alex Jr O AL 5•1281 ' 710 O K Tire Store of Renton louse-9624 3-6781 620 Vacant - .u_ Inc AL 5-0466 Clouse Milo G 11715 Vacant 621 Thompson Vere S AL 5-2635 Telephone Z 11409 Vacant 11715 Apartments 1 Vacant 626 Postlshek Mary®AL Alpine r 1 715 Greenacres Court Apartments 114U9cf_• Harry o PA 5-6679 2 Pyle Jerry E 5-5355 .1 4 e 1 w` Graham Alan H AL 5-8251 11416 Lake Washington Beach6?7 Smith Wm B O AL 6i0S2 '+ A. , 1 Vacant Mobile Pk PA 2-9514 3 Deimery Theo 7th av intersects 1 2 Dahl Elinor Randolph Ben J O PA 4 Fitzke Delroy H _ t3 Vacanth John 2-9514 S Owen Hobart S Jr PA - 700 gchmld Aldo It J @' • 4 Vacant 11425 Trend Realty Inc PA 5-9G29 y V L. p 5 Vacant 3-0544 6 Shands T 707 Sylvia Clifford E e AL ',•- M 7 Vacant 6733! „• 6 Daubs Virginia 11l27 Bryn Mawr Paint&Hdw Co 708 Kauzlarich Larry @ AL 5-0285 112 T Vacant PA 3-5191 ( Street continued M 8 Daubert Henry 11429 Walen Joseph 709 Pnaqulnl Sylvia Mrs AL Street continued 11717 Vacant • 5-4905 Srd Ave. �- �• 720 Carrico Joe C BA 8-6919 Nunis David M PA 6-7368 11719 Vacant dr.•'tl.• 11433 Personality Beauty Salon 11721 Car Caravan used cars PA' 711 Timmons Howard M BA r'" M �„yI•: -�t.I r Jenkins Dennis AL 5-2373by320 62585 I1e¢ton m ..`� '.' qq�Ii9 Helm Donald GPAr 5-8380Ma1p I. Vr • i c 760 Hlwa Fruit Mkt BA 6-2925 11435 Bryn Mawr Barber Shop 11743 PA 5-0152Mirs used cars 712 Pro558 Charlotte Mrs AL R-ashington .'vi;-K•l;; „ YCharclt Cnbts cubt makers big • Kersey Marvin N p PA 3.1497 ice con Renton Aviation Inc fly- 713 Tucker Edgar F AL 5-5788 •�' ••-•:^.c'; Renton Key&Saw shop 11437 Vacant lag sch AL 6-1422 718 Curry W m G BA 6-1728 .._ 1 � FOR LIST OF NAMES Fl u s e i W l" ■•`ie••• ` i — ' - P1 �� = ANY TRADE—ANY BUSINESS—ANY PBOF�93ION as109 L.I31 SELaND,Realtor r� M1 911 1 DETROIT W YORK CHICAGO 701 Sunset Blvd.E,at South West Fattens•to Renton Highlands These Al-Dias L32L4 .4 • * e " 9 1)a7 er Night (DES Sunset Blvd. W.) 0 ontd rear 0 G Fix-It-Shop heehold Z - _• Renton—Contd Williams Kenneth T PA Renton Ay S—C apple reyyr 1 a 724 Fault Chas J i7 AL 547707 J-44TT 204 Vacant 12815 Skyway Realty Inc PA W -� 725 Gfgll Angelica Mrs O AL 11892 Sander, Mary K Mrs O PA 205 Klinefelter Richd L PA 3-1800 and PA 3-6200 3-5812 Pharm o i ,� 5-5120 3-0146 12618 Shaw Bros Skyway .-.rc 0 727 Glgll Andrew O AL 5-3163 11900 Neblo Dorothy Mrs 206 Merritt Clyde Inc PA 3-20(l0 ( w , 0 e� 732 Vacant12617 Famll Finance CorpBr) Z u •' 11903 County Sewer Dist No 4 207 Hudson Quinton y P , 733 Wisniski Thee O AL 5-9742 PA 3-9600 301 Bell Darwin PA 5-4356 740 O'Hara Harold G BA 11905 Figg John D O PA 5-0080 ' 302 Vacant 12618 Vacant • I °a q, yb08S 11f106 Le(coekl Frank T G PA 303 RaYment Ronald PA 12619 Sky High Cate restr PA T �� " 1 p 740 Jenkins Mildred M Mn O 2-2661 Barber Shop PA i a �'ti �' AL 5-0629 - " 11908 Nemetz Thos C O ' 304 El5-lis 6 Dale E PA 5-2111 12620 B2-kywaY v _ ti 11910 Burn John N O PA 2-A763 i 305 Neperud Stanley P PA 2-9571 o�la t�s A O 8th av intersects I 2 4365 12821 Skywayy Jwirs k Sp g 801tip Ines James C 1191I Kano Yoshio PA ;Olt Duncalt Albert L PA 2-710T Gds PA 2-01T0 a �, McDaniel Chu W OO AL Fred a .+-� 5-7115 11914 Frederick Jos A O PA 1 307 c M H 12621a Forrester Realty PA a. B18 Under construction 3-4206 I street coouaued 2-4952 p- O 9th av Intersecb 11818 Ewalt Roscoe L G PA 12405 Vacant 12621b-c Sophie's Beauty Salon a I'asrR; s 18 12409 Vacant PA 3_3288 n.. �e"�♦l 11919 Taylor Edw W O PA 12409 Sperle C John real set PA i 12621d Superior Barber Shop k 4 RENTON'AV BOOTH h a 2-3549 3-2033 12622 Superior Hdw&Furn Co 2 of From 79ti av souk. 11924 Leaf Robt L O PA 3-9887PA 5-6310 s un 2 south S lE4fJr 12510 Kenny's Chevron Sery PA 12623 Beachcomber Tavern s• 11436 Bowles Percy W O PA 11925 Young Ernest M O PA 2-9841pp 2-973T - 6-8924 3-0783 12536 Vac a^t I gk wa Ice Creamer PA 11444 Scott Rex O O PA 5-1727 11928 Roberts Raymond O PA I 12540 South End Brokers Inc ` y y Y = >4 • 11468 Johnson Felton PA 5-6503 real eat PA 5-3220 I 2-9422 11605 SkywayElectronics telev • 11929 Tasa Jas M G PA 3-1099 12542 Vacant 12625 Balcom's Barber Shop �- H _ II932 Davila Dora 0 O'PA 12544 State Liquor Control Bd 12625 Kimball's Bakery PA u 1.-N repro PA 9-1314 3-0844 ( Store No 590 PA 3-8787 [W,.� : Drake Larry D G PA 3-0296 11933 Knutson Warren G O PA I 12546 Skyway Coln Lndry PA 12629 T A R MktSkyway Br gro t41! o a ,�- 11610 return 2-9641 o H - is 11630 Marx Edgar W O PA 3-2005 3-8877 PAS 2T7T o '� 11650 Long Marvin 11934 Berggren Harold L O PA 12012 Mellor Raymond E PA 12631 Skyway Tavern PA W 0 o H ''., 71856 Skyway Servfcenter gas eta 5-7426 site Sls Whol genl 29967 Ir .a.. PA 5-4885 11937 Murphy Clifton PA 3-6812 12p1S tndse 609 32635 VacantZ 11660 RiUcrcet Court Apartments 11938 Granstrom C Gordon O PA mdse PA 2-1187 12640 Hoyt'e Richfield Sery PA r O f � y L bayette Norman W O fC �. 1 Johnson Alf F PA 5-2230 11942 Jensen Otto C G PA 5-4796 12016 Roberta Phil O PA 3 2 12843 MFM2Eiec Co contra !S. W �• • 2 Mountain Thus 12001 Bailey David G Ci PA 3-6229 I 12022 Ross Albert B PA 3-3501 r 3 Mattson Gordon C PA 12005 Bower Richd G O PA 3-8310 12025 Pelroli Pete M O PA 5-4684 rn 3 _• ■ 5- 12006 3-6186Sehuk r Duane K O PA 12026 Osthus Norman E O PA 12645 Commercialndt�m o r `o u3 -+�' _ y' 4 Gawle Alonzo PA i•i1RE 3-6186 5-8664 pA 12649 Aero Reat Eet PA 3-8141 r t�, v 6 ttHE++g 5 Seabrlght Chester Fir PA 12011 Stephens H O O PA 12028 Olsen Donald G O 12861 Owen Hendry Drug PA ` t � fr 5-0603 3-6544 ` 3-0641 2-3278 IA W - • v. o n. 6 Moore gam - 12049 Holmgren Geo A G PA ' 12029 Hcrsehleb Roy B PA 3 U a ,� 7 Hilgar Win K PA E-94� 5-9164 3-380T 12663 MacDougall Howard L phys .es n r 41 O } i 8 Davenport Harold ; 12052 Baughman Ralph M PA I 12030 Klntw Theo G G PA PA 3-5050 N _ � R N 9 Shivel Joseph 3-6251 5-2896111262276700765 s SI al Stet PA 12687 Henny' ff^ - I a� 11 Buy J 12055 Inks Lawrence L G PA3 v ' ` 11 Butler David PA 5-3064 12033 Smith Thos H G'PA 5-4796 2-4696 1 '^ 12 Branchflower Rosabelle • 2-5390 12034 Chan Robt A O PA 5-8708 12705 Idea House The florists N Z O 1 yam-1 i, mg aWr Mrs 12058 Fosnaugh Grinnell B O ( 12038 Price Brian R O PA 12706 Vasa t394 I' `'fie ,•Jp1 12061 No return 5-4812 12712 Vacant n Donald E dentist ") W o 14 Packard Allen M PA 2-8418 12064 Helret Ronald E G PA i 12030 Peterson Chas E Jr O PA PA 3-3987 41 C �sy 15 DeWinter Chan 5-5137 Peter 16 Broten9 Susan E Mrs PA 4 ' 12067 Blair E J PA 2-2687 12042 Waller L A G PA 2-4903 Stone Lawrence A dentist m II' 1 Ederi 1204E Carlson Stanley W O'PA PA 3-3987 a' ,, 17 Bader Ross 12070 Laurk Marion L Mrs O PA I 9-0107 12714 Skyway Park Beauty Salon •'• t, n 5-5529 12046 Harper Clyde PA b-5369 PA 3-T478 ,. " t-, 19 Koltman H 12073 Rock Craig M O ` 19 OlsonKlinger C 12076 Wlntermyer Chas E O PA I 12648 Davenport's Martlnizl^g 12721 Vacant I yX 'y.,'. a 20 Donald sine PA 3-6880 12724 Coulon Jas C PA 3-5983 r. ' 5-'1858 12561 Dnve'e Flying A Sery PA 1!• 4 -" Z •Y 21 Peterson Kurt Jr PA 3�67D 12082 Morgan • Richd W e PA 12T27 J Ac G Ceramfce PA 3�102 ` _+, {: 8 22 Norton Frank V PA 5-5493 3-1881 2-9699 rear Greene Geo E O r S. B 1291h Intersects 0 — 6 116701670t continued Samsun 12401 Apartments 121100 • Market Basket Store No 2 12740 5-H 28 n Donald L C PA I Co I ` sss x b Berceun Mike PA 2-8978 1 Vacant gro pA 2-7600 � Z 2 i 89 11'880 Marinlch Wm C)PA 2-8104 : 2 Williams Henry PA 2-5527 12602 1 &W Tan Cent Store 12741 O'BrienO'Brien John J PA 6-5986 �� = � 3 0 11800 Skyway Methodist Church 3 Manle kl Jack Jr variety PA 2-7600 12741'�b 2680tt Frieda G PA tj Q�. I r Ar `_ I' r PA 2-8700 4 Mnnlcy Richd PA 5.8766 )2003 Skyway Texaco PA 12742 Highland Royal S O'PA ,�SS 11819 Skyway Park Bowl bowling 101 Thompson Ralph • S , PA 3-4224 1023 Vacant 2-9T38 2-3698 12600 Nicholas Business&Tax 12743 Stamey Dorothy DS a PA .i W 11840 Skyway Lbr Co Inc PA 103 Schultz David W PA 2-2008 Scry bkpg eery PA 5-4730 Stam 0 ^ -- - • Q S-g S0 104 Croyle Roberta P Mrs PA Strong Robt C lwyr PA I 12747 Norris Vi'm H PA 2-1465 1' 11883 3-1322 k Frank R PA 34121 i _, { t" 8 201 Johnson Karyn PA 5-0148 b-1T30 12750 Bruce Norman G PA 3', 11890 Tope -Turvy Day Nurser 202 Walker Annetta K PA 5-7043 12610 Skyway CM!PA 3-1960 3-2245 - Sit way Shoe repr • • CITY CENTER MOTEL RENTON COLLECTION BUREAU • 0 Z o 8i ENCLOSED HEATED POOL G COLLECTIONS ANYWHERE li • NO COLLECTION NO CHARGE j 0 o .+t,, PHONE 255-1401 SIM.L190 It .,: 5,.. Z ei J lt'*III 112 S.3d Street Renton US •MtWua M+aw,:sits 24.P.O. lea 212 (58065) 255•0231 1... �', = ii. - Z 197 '� 186 l _ �' a� Ct 12 620 Jones Eug B • C!,,,,'' 1 Q REDMOND AV NE-ConW 1006 Quisenberry Cindy Mq • . . •,. ..ww 664 t Bundinich Andy BA86F169 N AV S—FROM 1314 d 621 Droilotts Patk H • AL61284 r•� _: (/, g • tfli 8T NORTHW8 T 626 Postlahek Mary • AL66366 Mg . 667 t Higgins Pam Mrs 1006 Gitchel Earl O BA64001 627 Smith Wm B • = .�. ` ' sal O 668 Vacant 1009 Whnlan Ik+nnis • Allli�% O CODE 9ti066 700 Favro Aldo • AL6-6604 t ; 671 Robberstad Ralph J BA6-5215 W+ 1012 Walther Harold • BA►TN," Callen Fred C O AL6.7686 706 t Beres D Y r• '✓1 Q • 672 Gall Adam A • AT 60287 I . Vacant 1013 Matanski Larry ® BAL11�_ Nutt James R 0 BA6-2918 707 Sylvia Eug F 9 BAB 4296 ? � ' ✓:+. f676 675 Weber Herbert BA64306 NE LOTH CT 1NTEIISEL'f6 'Crime Wm C O BA82470 708 Kauzlarich Violet Mrs O •`.• �t W C 1020 Feighner Geo D • BAS01A`. Telourenti Frank ® AL67006 AL&-0286 . ri-• .w 679 t Longrie Eli: 1 Q in .0 N 680 Canney Robt O 1026 • Mead Verl C O BAS-4M1 !narrow Jack M BA6-b827 709 Wheaton Eleanor co, r .I;. 0' 883 Revert Howard R O • 1028 Jones Jack J • BA8494) _4'r. Curia Sheridan G ® 711 Timmons Howard M M m t = G 1032 Gitchel Ralph L • 1IA4141•; niar.o3 712 Provin Charlotte M Mrs • . } . E BA6-0744 lanlanon Baird M O AI6-6b&9 `"O e 1 684 Erickson David K BA6-9129 1033 Blearier Patk D • 27l•1I11 D a pi r ._ Z = 687 Conley Harold BA62426 1036 Young Frank C A1b40U '. leek Ralph P L5 7687 66 713 Thompson Tv : 11.) r Q 3. 688 Crosier Hugh T O BA6-4647 1040 Grant Wm J O BA8.OW1 -• Wtis G°o • AI.67687 718 Vacant rn = - # ,i ;l y O 691 t Lineba er Joel G O vhits Robt E Wayne G 48 801 Gigli Rorie M AIbb120 Y CJ'G a aK G ry 1044 Froelich Robt H • HAL♦7�, J 1,. • . 271-0725 Yc.Pheruq G 804 Vacant 1048 Huff E Leon BA86JW e Tharp Margt Mn • 807 Gigli Andrew ® AI6S163 S n OF .'/' • p - 692 Brown Claude F BA6-3972 1049 t Smith J B O 2268603 Alb 4344 808 Bergh Helen Mn BA62747 O U p r ws 696 Carlton Lewis D 0• AL62766 • �' : r •�„ 1060 Roland Carl H ® ALbi>I• Welch Wm P AL64099 811 Mountjoy James W 0 r)i - r ,;;. 1 NE 7TH ST INTERSECTS 1062 t Aamon Kathleen 26631. ?esker Ellie S AL6-7334 o.o H `'fi q 'Y' !t 761*Swartz Robt E la 1� Jl 1066 t Williams Danl L Rev hero Eugenia Mrs O 812 t O'Hara Harold i q ,n7r1 766 t Jensen Roy 266-6383 j Aib72L2 814 No Return +�ii•11t - 759 Holmquist Douglas E 0• 2285348 mutt Ralph F O AL6-b116 816 Newell John 0 • BA6-9078 x +�,i + •iF`,!!� 760 Van Vleet Gene E • 1069 Dotson Gary D ' Al6T�'• Anderson Michl W • 816 Broadbent Gordon H • '� 1 BA6-1606 1066 Richards James E • SAS-3106 BA6969T p f' ti ?� 763 Vacant Laamei.ter Raymond O S 9TH ST INTERSECTS y^ +F u • 764 Azeleon Opal S Mrs 6) 1087 Brunette J • ALS-210b 918 Mc Cutcheon Michi • C S{j�' •'✓� i`' Where A�0B44 BA61249 ldJarer Jack H AI5 OB62 922 Vacant r ` 767 Petersen Robt BA62762 �'• r 1072 Chatham Edw L O A1d41� kharini Nice C Mn O d dQ V. 770 t Banaaky Thw • 2267228771 1 op ,�'� � S ••'- Vacant 1073 Serpa Melvin J O AIbMY A163378 18 A .=.1 TO 777 Hansen G L O BA61109 NE 10TH PL ST INTERSH(�'. Bogen Claude P Oo AL62070 S 116TH PL INTERSECTS co R;},c"'i fi .. •� �� A NE PL INTERSECTS NE 11TH ST INTERSECTS' ; Colt Edw A BAS-6463 11410 Vacant A '1'�l = ° ':i Y• �:,.�� IV 803 t Kenney Barb 271,3898 1106 Bonwell Francis E • S' Kuaey Charles L AL6-6646 11433 Brooks John " C.) (!�^��. ii: + 1laysiek Edw • AIS7648 11444 t yenJudy Frank = Q ,;`la,• e� e•t 809 Howell Marion L O BA6-8767 A1.b2869 % Cotner E Edna Mrs • 11444 B er Jud Mn SP2-0764 Ze t•'t•' .flt H 815 Campbell Douglas L • 1111 t Hodde Edw BA8G087 Y Y "�' 3 'rl;,lq,i, + AL64256 11458 Johnson Feldon �.e y� BAS-0486 1112*Gardner Gardner James D • ••i .� T ••y4Y ` } Vdmu John F 0 271.0604 11464 Jourdan Roy H Jr • `YF Consult hats Dahlstrom Edwin AIS-0094 226-2728 t We Mary Mn w167063 69TH PL S INTERSECTS Aft, P t ,;� , ',. y 1,1i P60 Darrow David A OO SAS51{6 1114 Smith Ruth Mn BAbl1p/ yldenar Frank J • AL6S604 11606 Vacant art t..14. , }, 861 Ryan Marlene Mn AL61418CD• the 1115 Wendorff Bruce F • . , Petchnick Sam 0 11610 Roberts Emmelie SP2-0442 �, CD ' �l 854 Fisher Sally Mn 0• BA6b489 r• _ sr� . Classified BA6-5304 hrturmni Geo • AT 64109 Bagger Len SP2-2511 MIN 6 el Bbb Brown Roger L O ALL-3871 Wtko Louis • AiS-803b 11630 Davidson Dennis • n • �H -tY 4., 8689 Olson Charles D OO BA62112 1118 Cunyac Arth E OO A1b11•`' r, al t 869 t Baines Murra O BA61093 1119 Hurter H Donald O t: leads Raymond O r.69706 SP24729 • 0 jib _vt "057' l� Business 862 Nelson Paul W OO BA6-783T • AIb0646 German Marie T Mn • 11641 Clifford Gladys L Mn OO Q MINI {"';'!t tii , 1 863 Yankee Francis R • 1124 t Van Derford Lucille Mse 1A66934 SP2-0629 mg •L'!,! a �. �' t. a ii 11 lists _ heels Hugo E 0 AL6.3086 11860 Irish Evelyn Mn B .3, •. fir,. i � t =+ C `� .t lists BA6-2867 228.6676 k•p y' .•`•fi' t 866 Francis Doran R OO BA6-2013 lualeyEdwD • AL61281SP2-1237 CD 1,iP'/i„ s 1161 Thiele Claude H • AL4 ► `872 Boey Herold • BurekaPatrJohnOA16911666 Sk a Exxon Service �.e el�r g0. .'In1166 Holmes Kenneth J • CJ 8- PatriciaMn672-0660 �ii sa`d ir..P +L4rT t,r,R , NE 9TH ST INTERSECTS ALS-7106 IA62933 0s t`. • - ri - r.`G.s}a 906 t Christensen Norman A • 11666 Albertaon's Grocery(Skyway0 This 228-3519 1156 Salim Odell • 228481H Waoeau Rh.Mn ® Pk Br)SP2-1660 `.yl� `°s°�r fir+ t!• 912 Fife Dennis O BAB-1808 1169 Olson Vergil H • �41z 3867 68TH AV S INTERSECTS '1..1,i � •., t y_ • 1160 t Hawk C Mn Paull Kathryn A Mrs OO 11660 Hillcrest Court Apartments 0 '{•t -+•`•''' �•'tti Directory 915 Cantu Evaristo • BA6-0929 •+ 1••;l 978 Vetter Mark = Q • `'. 4:: 1169 Slater Alf K • BAbblll ALS3680 SP2.1237 i _ .,. 0 . vs weir cm TINT TVR P.C.P.S 1184 Lavachek Maurice R• OVisi Alai Jr • AL61281 1 Johnson Al SP2-1618 'r 1.,8y� •.LiF> *}*41` 1 4 y r i i sew; � - ;•At. .r- yb, 7 ty, t_ ' 6- •y, _ ••ice ,�'. r i. .• - • • Y • • ! • �E��; .. HUB INSURANCE AGENCY s , _ RENTON �� PHONE ALpine S-24H6 E" NO< ' t R►onsen Way and Park As.M. S ) a WRenton(98055) 222 Williams Irony*,f CI ai.«:� �..�� � 0 i. 700 j[ Mf < s ("_ lY 811 N ��; RENTON AV 8—FROM 1314 8 6Z0 Jon.,b Alez Jr A1S1 281 RENTON AV 8--Contd 1- < ' U'I�,: 7TH 8T NORTHVTEST ui BID. 11660 Hillcrest Court Ap ■ 621 Broilatts Patk H 0AL61284 SP2-1237 ��x „", u : ZIP CODE 9(i0[5 826 Postiahek Mary ® AL6.5355 1 Johnson Al SP2 1 t p �.o ^` 900 t Callen Fred C ® ALS 7686 627 Smith Wm B ® 2►Ayde Rita AI Hurt James R ® BA6.2918 �00 Vavio Aldo OO ALS-6,50{ 3 Mattson Gordon s 310 Trimm Wm C 0 BA8-2470 Vacant SP2-1622 �_'-40 ' 315 Delaurenti Frank OO AL67006 T07 Sylvia L•'ug F O BA6{yg5 4 Olson Donald a ' 3196 pew Jack M BA6S827 708 Violet Mrs OO 6 Packard Michl Sheridan G OO 6 Wilson Richd T S c AL6.6263 709 Wheaton Eleanor 7 Hunsberger Jim I • 1� 320 Bardara0a Baird M O 711 Timmons Howard M " ace 4992 1 fit' 33 6 Beck RalphLittle Geo ® AL5-9656 712 AoA�S Charlotte M Mn ® 8 YSloa ALS-7587 y 9 Vet ` 330 White Robt E O BA6S246 713 Vacant 'IC 10►Sloan Robt L 333 f Mc Pherson Wayne G 718 Lotto Mich1 S ® 11 Vacant Kanayo S •�; �' Tharp Margt Mn O 801 Gigli Rose M ALS6120 12 • i..`s AL6-{344 801 Vacant 14 Packard Allen M E 4i Y 1 338 Wm P AL-4093 807 Gigli Andrew ® 4L5 3163 No Return 6 �� u 4'� 343 f Welch Ellie S 808 Bergh Helen Mrs BA62747 ISG Return • 405 FA7Eu Mn O 811 Mountjoy James W • 16 f Gurule Frank AL5.7334 t 17 Vacant • 410 Knott Ralph F OO ALS-5116 814 O'Hara Harold OO BA 18 Vacant 411 Anderson Mich] W p 815 Newell John 0 O BA6 x 19 Vacant BA83106 816 Broadbent Gordon H OO t 201 Vacant • 412 LAAS.310 Raymond OO S BA6 9697 21 Draper Adeline M • 22 • M 416 Schloeeer Jack H OO ALS-0852 918 M;Cutchao (diCM k Phillips Jack STREET CONTINUED • f A 419) BNB C Mn 0 922 Vacant h 11670 Seresun Mike O SP �Y 11680 Marinich Wm OO SP 9 M 420 Rogers Claude P O ALS 2o7o S 118TH ST INTERSEC'1 420SS Co: Edw A BA S I16TH PL INTERSECTS 18 11800 Skyway Methodist C Imo 424 Kuney � • Charles AI S654g 11410 Quick Stop GroceryCenter00 435 Maynick Edw F OO ALS-7648 SP2-4100 Renton Avenue Day • 439 CosA tL Edna Mn OO 11433 Brooks Ostellia L Mn 11809 Skyway SP2 1860 SP21392yway Union SP2-9 3 ;OP C M C 500 f Vrdmar John F ® 27111504 11436 Vacant 11811 Seattle First Nations • ► 220 _ 601 �s Mary Mrs O AL67063 11444 Byers Judy Mn SP2-0754 11819 Skyway ParkP Br)Bowl5 b e , 502 Vidmar Frank J ®AL536p4 11458 Johnson Feldon me-h b C �L 503 Petchnick Sam pO 11464 Jourdan Roy H Jr © - Scky Stores 509 Sarturnini Geo OO A15 4109 69TH PL S _• Game-Inn restr SP2-I 515 Matko Louis o INTERSECTS 11825 Lucky Stores gro Baker •C r 523 Breda RaymondALS�Q35 11605 Vacant Van De Karat' C. si i 524 Overman Marie �lyA�Oo9706 11610 Roberts Emmelie SP2-0412 • 11829 Fisher Drugs SP2-072 M Bagger Len SP2 2511 11831 Skyway Park Clean r ` BA6$934 11630 Davidson Dennis OO• - C = C a 97 b3�0 Perola Hugo E OO AL53086 SP2-4729 Center SP2-6081 - "n C 4f Stanley Edw D OO ALS2281 11641 Clifford-Glad 11835 Mister Robert's Color 632 f Hunkainsa John OO SP2-0529 y' L Mn OO `- Coiffures beauty Salo A. ,w V ` ALSS169 S.''-1600 ' ' v, r 7 535 AL 169 11650 Irish Evelyn Mrs a0 • a BA&2933 Patricia Mrs O SP2.1237 X„ Lloyd's Barber Shop W e,« a` llsss SkywaySP2-9993 ay 606 Boisseau Eliz Mrs O 72- on Service 11837 Phillips Lloyd SP2-99 iiii AL5.48S7 � 11839 Clay's Lemon Tree 0 610 Fau1ATthryn Mrs OO 11656 Albertson'e Grocery(Skyway M Restaurant SP2a180 Pk Br)SP2 1660 11840 Herr Lumber Co SP2 68TH AV S INTERSECTS ; 118{4 Herr Lbr(Stge Only) 1973 POLK DIRECTORY 31' at• • 1 ; . • .• r . /9r3 tr • / a • SERVE YOU 203 ..•.' ,w •- • �" ' 12 708 Kauzlarich Violet Mn 6 i 2 0 $11,4 It)N AV S-FROM 1314 S 255-0285 was km ftg Err NORTHWEST 709 Wheaton Ralph WEST t[�i011t1sa h•La. - ; 711#Rose Glen 226-6978 CODE 98055 712 Provin Charlotte M Mn OO p taBen Fred C O 255-7686 255-5583 j Bart James R 6 2262918 713*Covert Steven M 228-1325 Francis Dona R • +„kar, 4• , •eam' Gladys A Mr ® 718*Verzola Louis Boey Harold lt..e>I> 3470 801 Gigli Rose M 255-6120 e .. 9TH ST INTERSECTS ASDslanreati Frank O 255-7006 804#Faull Donald L ® 235-0130 .-,� "r is Christensen Norrnaa A • affaarrme Jack M 226-5827 807 Gigli Andrew ® 255-3163 w,No ' • . Fife Dennis € 2261tr0 . bans Sheridan G O 255-6263 808 Bergh Helen Mrs 226-2747 Cantu Evaristo € 21e.aq s 1lardaraon Baird M O 811 Mountjoy James W OO . - s 10TH ST INTERSECTS '# ak y Ralph P € 255-9656 255-7334 0_'" • *Hunt Berle R 271 1a_: • Lola Geo € 255-7587 812 O'Hara Harold 226-5083T. Gitchel Earl 0 2264.x' trite Robt E ® 226-5246 815 Newell John 0 ® 2269076 • *Mc Hoes Alvina M • 41*Pherson Wayne G 816 Vacant 271-2077 lips Tharp Margt Mrs0 ST INTERSECTS :0 Walther Harold 6 Macs 255 4344 918 9TH 8 Mc Cutcheon Michl O r•. Matanaki Larry 6 3,ias ja Ihirh Wm P 2554093 228-0993 L' 'wa 10TH Cr �'TERSEcts �ICswman Reggie L 922 Vacant 1':1: Feighner Geo D 6 madras Piero Eugenia Mrs O •,,,_ Mead Verl C 0 2264os f '358-7722 N-n Vacant LisaRalph F O 2.555116 S 116TH PL INTERSECTS 17 43MM Vacant 212 Aaderaon Mich!W O 11410 Andre's Woodcraft.And Gift _-o e. Slower Patk D ® 271•ii7: 063106 Store 772-4750 A •No Return L seister Raymond O 11420*Hoag Glenn E Grant Wm J 6 222,•on: A 05.2105 11433 Brooks John 772-1392 Froelich Rob) H •' SasYR *bd3krrser Jack H € 25541452 11436 Vacant ht i Smith J B C 2265517 01 y,1rini Nice C Mrs © 11444 Vacant t Roland Carl H € 256= !`- J` 1553378 11458 Vacant a oo's: gfa) I :Aamon Kathleen 2S.S1ec a'l ye 0s Claude P 255.2070 11464 Jourdan RoyH Jr O 4/raffia i W:llsama Dull L Res 41w C r Edw A 2266463 69TH PL S INTERSECTS i rw °'jsadj� 228-5348 a[anry Charles L u= C MLanon Del € 2555546 11605 Vacant sT Richards James E • ner EdwEd OO 255-7648 11610#Mittendorf C 772-5525 *Camer E&Ina Mn OO Vacant e�; Y 255-3944 :1E64255 ' Brunette Leonard J C RYidmar John F O 271-0504 11630 Davidson Dennis O 226-1249ax Tali M M 772-4729 V can Mary n O 25.5-7063 11641 Clifford Gladys L Mr O x t Serpa Melvin J 6 256- 0 *s PItrhnick Saoar m OO 25 r3601 Irish772 Evelyn w m E 10TH PL ST INTERSECT! mini Geo €2554109 11650 Evelyn Mn O o )� r3 '• 7721237 E 11TH Sr INTERSEX.'1S *maw Louis ® " N ..- t i Bonwell Francs E 6 OS Dada 68TH AV S INrERSELTS ram- , •y.•. 255-2859 Raymonde @ 255-9706 11655 Skyway ESocon Service w-w M Qaman Marie T Mn OO 772-0660 :'_o aJ z' *Houde Eder O 22&En67 I.." 34 Gardner James D O 11656 Albertson'e Grocery(Skyway ws= - ' j 226-2728nerP rda Hugo E O 255` Pk Br) 772-1660 'a.: -'� i I Smith Ruth Mn 22b1f]I Soh Edw D CO 255-2281 11660 Hillcrest Court Apartments "_''^ 17 i Wend Bruce F 6 John O 169 1 Johnson Ena 772-1618 :� a± i 2*Fogelman226-5304 :�' l Conyac Arth E 25b83O balsas Elir Mn (I 255-3857 3 Mattson Gordon C _ r 1 Hurter H Donald 0 - Kathryn A Mrs O 772-1622sonD l 255-064.5 4 Olson Donald 772-2154 iT- .. 9 1 Van Derford Lucille bins . 6#Keough Diane *' •' Alex Jr € 255-1281 6 Wilson Richd T 772.1243 K f r•_1s l ThieleClaude H 0256 Ifl 1 Wm R 6) 2264473 7 Huncberger Jim D ...: 1. :-1 a"- ette Patk H ® 772-4992 s„z ,.228-5676 `-� i#Barrett Ron € �' �1284 fl .. 3 Satin Odell € 228aA`A • 8#Kendall Steve 1 Olson Vergil H O 7ddl O® '>' S5 • 9 Woodward Jerry 772-2809 Ei:^ Hawk C Mn Mama Aldo® 2 -04 10 Mykleburrd Larry ►- . 1#Hoffman Robt O 23SOfC ✓� David E 11*Meyers Bob - ,• 1 Lavachek Maurice R • 2557510 12 Camp Dennis g. J=•• �F® 2264295 14#Hudson Berle ' r' 1975 POLK DIRECTORY ; . '.; ithi - • awe • ... • - -t:'.'i�. l �f .HF' �.!' �,,�.'. .r �tr M; yY Y•9I�O,�,�y# a .f, < r,�". tr �1.'.�. �a ii ''1 .. j w ,.,v.; N. „t-.1""y-.1:•'�.1 �1 "' 1 F �,a•r Y .- ,. Iy : i yti' ..• .,-.." ;A'yR+,S,.5.--- +! i.i . . •• �'Y i.. .. . !Iv�+�tIM 1 •1 1.,�. Nit-. - M., cv'.J ''••i-.r .yA. . ��• M..,f �� 'R:I"..�y‘.i'' • 1 h • • �t/' •� i a.�•r J7U:hh reefly +c_ =j ( , ,I,,1 • S fi*.I+i, 1 e �- 7�`r 4 (r i .Street i• t ,� ;„, S.} • 'S66ttie(9a1 04) }z" ' t e t r' �( .� s Tel 447-3700 • » -- -..'4 KING COUNTY • • 1 •; 1 OLYMPIC RISE INTERSECTS '"f"'� v �nW 686 Crosier Hugh T• 226-4647E MACLYN ST INTERSECTS �! `l4�( -' M L.7 2 6 69l Bros•arC•r feel G 4i 271-0725 407*Soonenfeld Walter W 0 8644327 • e�•.1 ' 696 Vacan Claude F 2263972 7 { Sr M 7722421 433*Evacwn Donald G 6641201 696 7TH 434 Yambra Clare K Mn 0 6526267 :'1 lrfs:•.t�:• . trr7 - NE 7TH ST INTERSECTS 466 V,tndaoberg Charles 0 662.0961 ../;•K', '•^, -ands , ,751*Rsyoolds Claudia 0 2564340 5G VandaSON ST •INTERSECTS '20651 7b6*R+1ey Marilyn 189 Pollack John P 0 6621759 • ' p",4�diir 760 Holmquist Gene E E® Mrs 0 8624096 '•."-. Vartw 7Qo Yea Vied Gene E 0 2261606 493 Iverson Margt r :-.a• li n •:- 763*9acJtley Ronnie SEATTLE ST INTERSECTS • �."`.. Randy 784 Schmidt Ralph 0 ... 502 La.Robt E 0 8624610 • - - : 5T -.� - 508 Binkerd James A 0 862-5724 '''-.1 .Y 7712168 ,767*0ehat Marylou 0 271-3307WOODLAND WAY INTERSECTS t� 77l Bmaaky-Tboa 0 22672?9 _ Av.E hen 0 8622e10 - 711 . •:.-..*.. • V- :. T7I No R David 2T3-1686 637 luring V- 24540l6 TR lie Return „ 537 Baerny's Valley Maintenance jan eery (W 7211640 862 326 .. - - ' la ee 772.0466 NE 8TH CT IN'I'ERSEC.'I5 .. Baeroy L•Roy L-0 862 i� c r.1•:a 803 Rica Clay 0 2.tb0786uA919 •636 Elliman Lam our D 0 • '• TIC,7I • $15 W r•on Jame,A 0 ? 617 Cower Grant E 0 864-1326 :) ��t; • fans H .:x 8l5 Wallas Jerry D 0 2265196 CHICAGO ST INTERSECTS ;--,1".l-- . Cr Eleanor 831 No Ratter Edwin 0 ZSS-0094 700 Venable,Harry R 0 - •.,_ 'rsu . _ ;..1161 No Retire 706*Stubbs Mich)N 0 - ii 1 ,.86l Schaaf Heins K® r •, i,:. K - LAUREL ST INTERSECTS ,. .�',a'•`'''. ;.•< Ut31 65l*Fisher Clifford 0 2266499 722 Cnoahew Fern E 0 g64O676 ;.1 '"�:',•. ,:.r rir Inc come my 865 Vacant 724 Chadwick TTws M 0 6623372 ill •4 0 6,,"..• 668 Frazier Michl R 0 256-7924 724 Chadwick wic Ray® "`^T 'ashy 772-1000 ••859 Vacant Al Z; 4�w..• ', 862 Nelson Paul W 0 2267837 HEMLOCK ST INTERSECTS �`; �':• _..863 Yankeh Francis R m 2262857 e03 Ellis David R 852-065 •5r` '- '�%': 812 Buxton Roger L 8b4-0.%B ' I .! eel V A 0 772-0867 866 No Return Doran R 0 226-2013 815 Ellis Paul T 0 862-0102 # ' ,,.' Robt • E 7720111 . No Return 819 Vacant I t, -� [toot ... NE 9TH ST INTERSECTS 824 Wilson Madeline Mn®862b0I5 :1 - 4 • , E hen T 772-1287 9061 No Return - 825 loop Irene Mn O 852-2519 p` ' t iERS£Cf5 :915 Can uD Evar t 22 226 62555*Rouman Lavonn•654-2620 .R 915 Cantu ST Itn 0 INTERSECTS2 838 Radian Erl•nd A 0 854b914 A •- yii • rvid NE LOTH es R271.11 640 Reit=Eric 0 864-1966 sidermy Studio 7721020 -1006 Hunt Bessie R 271.1401 844 Italian Edmond L 0 862-2730 _,• .hop small sppl repr 1006 Mcahel Hoes Ali 2M (6 ,855 WilcoxPaul M 0 B52-0626 •1 �� y,. • .1009 W Jeannene M02(62277 ,, t 1012 Wa)tb•r T Mn 0 2262173 W ALNUT S,i,1'V,CF.RSI'X1�' .1 '} r 1013 M17TH C INTERSECTS® 905*Me Kelsey Hamilton O 8527466 ,t .4 f.. �"' tRD IN NE LOTH CT oD@=8 906 Eggert Wilfred A 0 852-1703 1 v t-4 . '. i RD INTERSECTS 1020 Ftighnar Geo D 0 2?B-0'753 913 Lend Arnold it''f•a!7 RI- ' . 10211 Mad VWl C 0 226897 919 Marian Bert R 0 652.2629 • i- i27 R •.t 626 1032*Phelps Johnns 22 5-14284T 926 Loop Brooks E 0 8620947 •.1 Alt a:!,. • IRE HTONI-FROM 1033 Brown A 226--7977 927 Marlatt Calvin B 0 8626381 'u VAY SOUTH 1036 Nrowets Phil 0 2267976 MAPLE ST LN'TERSECIS ^� 1036 No Return AY' lib 1040 Grant Marilyn Mn 0 2280'931 1005 Hillorest Ctm•tery IW21322 Iftt T. . r. • • 1044 Froelich Robs H 0 2265991 6W Froelich Carol 22-2987 REITH RD(RENTS---FROM igloo • 0- ' " ' 1049 Huff Leon 0 228.2967 ri t� - MILITARY RI)EAST I sum �, 930 1049 Smith Joseph B 0 T?A550.9 �.-. - ; NW 64TH AVONE 1050 Roland Carl H 0 255-2220 ZIP CODE 98031 yt�+� uP 11400 W7'H S 1062*Brown Rode J 2856038 4436*Kraft Clifford E 0 862-0832 S_'Sn --•"' •,.` 1055 Larson Ede fllV,610 - .53.17, 178 • 1059 Larson Dal 0 - - - . G 772.2873 1066 Richards Jam••E 0 255-3944 �' .: moard A 772b6.50 1067 Brunet[•Leonard J 0 2261249 R 1314 3 4 SN AV S(7TH STNORTHWEST OM 'h•it;•:j ,m • 1072 Vacant - -••4' 7724779 " 1073 Serpa Melvin J 0 2666643 4M4 s N --r NE LOTH PL ST INTERSECTS _� NE 11TH ST INTERSECTS • ZIP CODE 98066 t t 800 Callen Fred C 0 255-7688 . . 610 1105 Burwell Francis E 0 255-2859 310 Hurt James R O 2262918 - i ✓ I NORTH N>•--FROM 1111 Gaud• deJames a 2264067 2 311*Norm Robt 271-1634 :� �v,1"•�, I PL NOATH 1112 GardnermithJame,D® 2262728 315 D•laurtnti S•vrina Mrs 67 2567006 yy, ..•.''. 1111 South rT B Mn 226-1223 316 Sparrow Jack M•2266627 c'Rer +: B0 0 1118 Wendorft Brun F 2 226-5304702819 Evans Sheridan G•2664243 rei in G 255-3536 1118 Hu Conyac Arch E® 255-8702 Ba Bid M 41 4 - -+•l . rry 27g664q 1119 Hamer H Donald le yrs @ Ralph P 0 2569666 ; f 1124 no .,Clauded Lucille Mn 0 2285616 326 Beck Geo 0 255-7687 •4j.,` - que6w E 0 2711692 1151 7Tiela H 0 2561610 330 White Robt E 0 226b246 •• •m 6u L Mrs 2552547 1155 Barrett Ron 02264989 333 Mc Pherson Wayne G tf'?' • 4 0 2282397 1169 Vacantaa Odell 0 2284854 may Tharp Mare[Mrs a 255-4344 " .'1160 1160 Houk Darleen 0 396 Wtich Wm P 4>J 2564t)g3 .-• k?3SI817 343 Newman Raggie L 0 Rick J 0• 2263812 116 ek Donald:A 23SOB54 {Ob*Tonda Ede 0 2567222 iL1- d Ralph J 0 255-9361 1164 Lavachek Maurice R 0 410 Knoll Ralph F 0 2666118 i��\ f aa.e.ra�,��a•���� 'i. n A® 255-0287 ^,may' 600 411 Anderson Ann M Mn 0 er REITEN RD(KENTI-FROM 700 412 Lasmeister Raymond 0 2bb2105 `',i; ' .- Mbert J 0 2264306 416 Vacant T_ , • Mary TSB SOUTHEAST 419 Balrarini Nuo C Mn 0 2b69,776 -:�i" - Jrrry E 27 Mrs 6 420 Rogers Claude P 0 2562070 .'r I David K 2 6 2260T44 KZ CODE 98031 - E TI7TJS ST INTERSECTS 12054 Con Edw A 2266463 v;`-yt • David K OO 2269129 424 Kunay Charles L 2666646 '‘' -1,. 4.:.,?. '_ . :no E 0 KENSINGT'ON AV S INTERSECTS I ;,u.r ,e• . 1977 POLK DIRECTORY :_,y- = 1A }L�4s , • yi '# r r ,4- -. ' 1 Allim /977 • • �.: i •• Open lhurs>1ay. i t ;:. a flights 711 9 4 - :: nwersit ookStorc•�, '.0 nn�, U Farb,free 1_. L, Y a_ `-�tsy :_ -�1 . Use Your tan ,i �316 University War ILE.:'Seattie 1981051 s>6343400 , MANNIND; RENTON AV S(R)—Contd 22 Hudson Beryl - 12015 Le Fayette Sales w I 435 Maynick Edw 0 255-7648 STREET CONTINUED 7721160 439 Costner E Edna Mn®7554245 11670 Sereaun Mike 0 7720567 La Fayette Nortnat ✓r 500*Mc D000ugh Jan 0 ' 11680 Marinich Wm 0 772-0519 • S ism FL INTERSEI 1 11n C. 601 Kali•Mary Mrs 0 2557063 S 118TH ST INTERSECTS 12016 White Robt K 772 502 Vidmar Frank J 0 255-3604 11800 Skyway Methodist Church 7721700 12022 Martin Helen Mrs 503*Telken Ronald 0 271.2916 Renton Anemic Day Care Center 12026 Petrol+Pete M 0 ' 608*Vidmar John F 0 271-0504 7721660 12026 Osthus Norman E 509 Saturni Geo 0 255-4109 11605 Vacant 12029 Aake Arth H 0 r r`' m 615 Matko Louis 0 255403-5 11809 Skyway Union 7729901 12030*Campos Edwardo 623 Breda Raymond 0 255-9706 11811 Seattle First National Bank(Skyway 12033 Smith Taos H 0 524*Mc Cloud Kenneth OO 2266934 Pb Br)583-6974 12034 Foss Mich)D 0 7 '� 528 Perot*Visalia V Mrs 0 2553086 11819 Skyway Park Bowl bowling 772-1220 12038 Helterlioe Harold • - 63 0 Stanley Edw D 0 2552281 Game-Inn restr 7721220 12039 Burnett Roy S 0 532*Csrnes Ed B 0 255-5169 11825 Lucky Storm gro 7721750 12042 Waller Gladys T T YR•. BONDED 635 Gilroy P.tnna Mrs 0 228.2933 Van De Kamp Bakery 12043 Farrell John J 0 606*Blattner Nicholas 2716618 11829 Fisher Drugs 7720720 "12046 Harper vlyde R 4 . COLLECTORS KathrynA Mrs0 225,3680 11831 Skyway Park Cleaning Center 12049 Vacant Y -610 Faull 7726081 12052*Lee B E Mrs 772 6112Cuginiodg n W Jr 0 255-128126Gilchrist Insurano 620 Hodgson Wm R 0 226N73 11935 Robert's Color&Coiffures beauty 12056 Gilchrist James R .:.:• r d' 621 Brouilletta Path H 0 255-1264 salon 7721600 626 Postishek Mary 0 25355 Coles Barber Shop 77299'39 12058 Pomade Frank 0 •.�'! 5.6- 627 Smith Win B 0 11839 Tenderloin Unlimited restr 7725900 12061*Dorrough Earl • 700 Favro Aldo 0 255560{ 11840 Herr Lumber Co 7721550 12064 Berry Dean Mrs v 706aCooch Edwin 226-7798 11644 Herr 1br(Stge Only) 12067*Meuli A L 77211 .;F^fir:.•: -w . ' 707 Sylvia Lug F 0 226-4295 11890 Kent Gasoline 4 Stge(Stge Annex) 12070 Luck Mary Ann 'q`, 708 Kauzlarich Violet Mrs 0 255-0285 11900 Keens Gasoline&Storage gasoline 12073 Rock Viva M Mr �." '- 709*O'Hara Phil 12076 Ginithan Fred O 711 No Return 12082 Morgan Richd W 11901 Bill's Skyway Drivsln restr g .t79Z0 " - 75TH AV S INTERSI :! 712 Vacan Charlotte M Mn OO 253-6683 11903 Skyway Park Arm 772.9988 12401 Skyline Apartmer •Ys •: NO FEE 713 Vacant 1 Ulrey D Bruce' 718 Verwla Louie 11904 Marianna Apartments 7T21458 - • 2*Merz Gerald 77 4� UNTIL 801 Gigli Rom M 2555120 101 Hendry Cindy !� 804 Faull Donald L 0 2350130 102 Mauromatia Constantine 772.2665 3*Mere J � iA ' WE COLLECT 103*Crozier Lenore 4 Sowers Theo 77 807 B rg Andrew 0 2226-73 101*Lpriore P 8081 Bergh Oy James 220 25747 105 igamoen Ray ell MounyoY James W OO 2557334 105 Janders Mary K Mrs 7721410 . 102a Allen Howax 106 Fitzgerald Voris • -"103 Burfeod D 812 O'Hara Harold 226-5083 101 Mc New J '.e+ 107 Anderson Soren A 772-1478 815 NewellJohn 0 0 226-9076 �� 616 Vacant • 108 Bender i(ath Mn 7724819 �Wes°Fred +X • S 9TH ST INTERSECTS 109 Birdsall Harold 7721458 203 Woodbridge ' 916 Mc Cutcheon Michl 0 228-0993 • 110*Hanke Richd • 3 Mac Donald • "qr;• 922 Vacant - Ill Konis Wm T 7725760 _ _-__20.4 Smith S 116TH PL INTERSECTS 201*Nanecivich Cynthia 205 Smith Jerry • 202aWeber Carl - 207*Denny K E 628 203*Carland M .,.;T I 0* D 11410 Andre's Woodcraft And Gift Store 204*Morrow Betty 302 Tow-mend Ju • • 1513 : T724750 205*Mc Cano Alice - I;:. 206*Ostrom Margt -, 303 Stevens Dale • ; 1143 John 77213 .-.. 904 Schuerman( . k" N.W. - -11433 Brooks A 7721392 207 Mills Mary Mrs 7724399 9p5f Hemphill W -.,�., i' 11436 Taylor N V 772bb04 ` 208 Mercer Agnes Mrs TJ2'8868 57th Street209 Clay Robt H sr-- -- --806aSchuerrnan .ate 1146 Ervin Guy_i - ts•. , 307 Vacant Seattle 11464 Vacant •Roy •_„ ......t+ma t: 2101 Fiel Ca -- '''.... _ -���.�- 11464 Jourdan H Jr 0 211 Lappin Cain 772b086 :-. '/'-gD'ItEET CONTINUE 98101 69TH PL S INTERSECTS ..• 4''72D AV S INTERSECTS i 7A»12406 Vacant • 1, 11905 Farmer Mildred Mrs 7724388 12407 Vacant ": - _11606 Vacant --- - 11610f Bowker Gregory H.7720175 11906 Lefcoaki Frank T 0 7720256 12 Rainiera Fabrics Resit, • 11630 Weber Gene 0 7711126 z:` 11908 Lewis Michl 7711575 Skyway . -11641 Clifford Gladys1.dy. Mrs 29Dui 3&4 7710800' --'. Gloria notion 77205 11909 County Sewage • • �� 11650 Thew Marie 0 7722941 11910f0'Livu 1242) Pizza Hut raw Edw 7721955 7tl'TlL AV S INTER • 66INTERSECTS 11 AV S 11911 O'Halloran Charles 0 7724755 11665 Skyway Eason Service 772-0660 ' 11914 Frederick Joseph A 0 7724903_-- -12512 King Size 0 Phot • 11656 Alber eon's Grocery(Skyway Pk Br) 11918 Smith J 7712744 12536 721 Co T1+ Sot7721660 11919 Taylor Edw W 0 ,l Clipping ..i • +, 11660 Hillcrest Court Apartments 74TH AV S INTERSECTS 12fi40 Hunter 2]setzo 1 Johnson Al 7721618 11921a Weber H Earl 0 7720162 7723999 .... • 2*Hesener Frank 74TH AV 6 INTERSECTS 3aSherwood Randel 11925 Young Ernest M bldg 000tr 0 12542 Vacant i�- • �•S TEL 7720640 12544 Room Thuteer �:t 4 a Nicole 7722164 . 11928 Davis Lena Mn 772.1919 I.i 789-2600 6 Lane Nicole • 11929 Tam J M 0 7720656 12546 Skyway Coin' I. 7 Wilson ab rger T 772.1743 7 -4 12548 One Hour Ma '",..4,: � 11992 Davila Art 7 Helles gar Jim D 772�992 12661 Abbott Autam • 1; � 11933 Rabago Dad L O 772J637 efBoods GailT726090 ' , 9 Woodward Jerry'r7y2LkY9 11934 Ber n Harold L 0 7721987 - '' _..-10*Meyers y Denies 11937 Campbell nos T 0 772-6418 Skyway Po71 11938 Courtney Charles 0 7711373 '1• 7721165 -...c! .11 sob r• S 116TH ST IN-TF -12 Hyde Rita 77'1-6695 11942fHastings K - -;15600 Family Marks h" t • 14aGikhrist Wm- 6 120TH ST INTERSECTS -••- .. -w12803 Franke Milk I �,.. 16 Smith Jorph 7724789 -----------.---- __..._.� 810 7721980 .t -,7 /0N� UVtBaran - -- A - • 12001 Bailey Juanita L Mrs 0 772d280 -:t=^ ' SelfSer.ios G ='18 Sauna -��- - • State Liquor 19 rsues - 12006 Bower Cube Mrs 77 7729922 —1116 6 V��t Ranh • 19 Haugen Lob - 12006 Berger Robt S Jr 772d789 r - '•�- 20*Harrmn Aline't 12011 Stephen Mary?'this•7741792 . 12616 A& H Drue t.a. 21 Camp Da a& • 11012.Vsant ., (--7(:<._ 1. T72E000 • i+UJE. t. _.:.et,. 1977 POLK DIRECTORY . RECEIVED • t' .' CITY OF RENTON • �• ^� ITEM NO. �q !� _ HEARING EXAMINER JUN 2 01978 PM LIMITED USE PERMIT NO. 20-23-05-1111 AM 7001101111121112A415,6 • • • THHIS LIMITED USE PERMIT made this day of . 1977, by and between PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, a Washington corporation ("Puget" herein) and TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, as Trustee, ("Transamerica" herein) : In consideration of the covenants and conditions herein con- tained and in full compliance with paragraph 6 of that certain Earnest Money Agreement dated October 29, 1965, between Puget Western, Inc. , and Transamerica Development Company, Puget hereby grants permission to Transamerica to use the real property (the "Property" herein) situated in Renton, King County, Washington, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference • made a part hereof. 1. Term. The term of this Permit is ninety-nine (99) years from the date of said Earnest Money Agreement of October 29, 1965. 2. Use of Property. The occupation and use of the Property by Transamerica shall be limited to access, uncovered automobile perking and recreational purposes, provided that such use and occupation shall not be exercised in a manner that would interfere with, impede or be detrimental in any way to the unrestricted primary use of the Property by Puget for electrical utility right • of,Way purposes or in any way create risks or hazards to persons or property. in light. of such primary use, and provided further that Transamerica's use shall at all times be expressly subject to Puget 's right to construct, operate, relocate, maintain or repair existing or future transmission or distribution lines on the Property without any cost to Puget arising from any disturb- ance to improvements made by Transamerica. 3. Structures. No building shall be erected or permitted upon the Property at any time and no other structures shall be erected except those normally incident to uncovered parking and/or recrea- tional purposes and in no event shall any such improvement be permitted which would in any way create a risk or hazard with relation to the primary electric utility use to which the Property is devoted. In the construction of any permitted improvements, Transamerica shall comply with all applicable safety and building codes and regulations. 4. Taxes. Transamerica shall be responsible for the full amount of real property taxes assessed on the Property and any improvements made thereon by Transamerica. Transamerica shall, • on an annual basis, reimburse Puget for the full amount of any such taxes paid by Puget following the notification by Puget as to the amount thereof, but not ..upon any improvements made thereon by Puget. 5. Insurance. Transamerica shall buy and maintain in full force and effect throughout the term hereof public liability insurance in the policy amounts of $1,000,000/$3,000,000 and property damage insurance in the policy amount of $50,000. Such policy or policies shall expresly name Puget as an additional • insured and shall be non-cancellable without prior Written notice first having been delivered to Puget. 6. Assignment. Transamerica, or its successor, may at any time assign or transfer all of its rights hereunder, provided . that no partial assignment or transfer shall be permitted Without the prior written approval of Puget, which approval Puget covenants it shall not withhold unreasonably, taking into consideration the needs of Transamerica, or its successor, in connection with an orderly development and sale of the property. Upon ar.y assignment or. transfer, Transamerica; or its successor, as the case may be, shall be relieved of its urraccrued obligations hereunder with respect to the property so assigned or transferred. 7. Termination for Default. If Transamerica or any of its assignees or successors shall default in the performance of any covenants or agreements or conditions herein with respect to any portion of the Property, and if such default shall continue for a period of thirty (30) days after receipt by Transamerica or its then successor or assignee with respect to the Property so involved of written ,n'otice from Puget of said default, .Puget may, at the end of said period, declare this permit forfeited and said term ended with respect to the portion of said Property' involved, by giving Transamerica or its said successors or assigns then holding Transamerica's interest with respect to such portion of • the Property involved, written notice of forfeiture. - 2 - LIMITED USE PERMIT (P.S.P.& L. Co. No. 20-23-05-1111) • EXHIBIT "A" That portion of the H. H. Tobin Donation Land Claim No. 37 lying Southerly and Westerly of the Plat of Highland Addition • to the Town of Renton, and that portion of Government Lot No. 1, Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , County of King, State of Washington, lying east of Primary State Highway No. 1, more particularly described as follows: CO'•MENCING at the intersection of the North line of said Section 20 with the Westerly limit of• the Plat of Highland Addition to the Town of Renton, said point is North 89°59'27" West, 1,386.85 feet from the North Quarter corner .of said Section; thence South •'01 29 35 West along the Westerly limit of said plat, .973.04 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing South 01°29'35" • West, 214.88 .feet; thence North 67°03'41" West 554.63 feet to the Easterly 'limit of Primary State Highway No. 1; thence along • a curve to the left, from which the radial point bears North • 62°49',31'.' West, having a radius of 2,050.00 feet through a central angle of 05°34 '36" an arc distance of 200.14 feet; ,thence South 67°03'41" East, 470.99 feet to the TRUE POINT bF BEGINNING. - Containing 102,235.84 square feet ;ore or less. SUBJECT TO: All prior rights of record. • +lLI..C'!V f_Li ,.:liY Of. fiEMION CITY OF RENTON HENliNG EXAMINER .-.: 2 )1978 • PLANNED_ UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION AM PAI /-.� REN 7t819,I0,11d2s11213.4•Si6 • FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY / OON. O ' MASTER PLAN IQ lb Date Rec'd. PUD ppR 21' 19 F- Fee $ .Rc'/ ,f o ' -�"� Receipt No. //god X Tentati .0 _ — _ Residential SM No. • -- - f'rFlimin '(9 P4�i Commercial F.CF No. •----.-- .._...-. Final NNi G D� Industrial Plat No. Phase No. Mixed {I .En✓.ee,,,r,..,4/ Fre �4�C/ -APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 13: 1. Name Gene 0. Farrell Phone 772-5003 Shenandoah Homes Address 280 Hardie Avenue S.W. , Renton, Washington 98055 2. Property Location West of Cedar Avenue at 7th Street. 3. Legal Description (attach additional sheet if necessary) ' • ADDITIONAL SHEET ATTACHED . . . • 4. Acres 10.18 Present Zoning R-3 ' 5. Type of PUD requested: . x© Residential . ❑' Industrial HIBI�' NO. /c'- Commercial ❑ Mixed I'EM NO. 4 - /7 - 7 ' 6. Residential Characteristics Proposed: Total DUs 53 DUs/Acre 5.2 DUs by Type and 'No. See Attached Brief 7. Commercial/Industrial Characteristics Proposed: Number of Structures N.A. • Gross Leasable Area Type of Uses , 8. Range of Structure Height: From 22 feet to 30 feet. 9. Special Review Areas (in acres): . •❑Under Water [' Subject to Flooding ['Greater than 10% Slope 9.1 Acres ❑ Subject to Landslides • 10. Other Permits Required: Rezone ❑ U.S. Army Corps ❑ Shoreline Management El• ❑ Flood Plain ❑ 11. If land' or structures within a proposed PUD are, (1) to be sold to more than one person or corporation or,. (2) to be included in the dedication of land, then a short or major plat application is to be submitted Concurrently. 12. Vicinity and site plan maps, landscaping plan, building elevations, written infor- mation, and fees must be submitted as. required by the PUD Ordinance (See Section 4-27.10). 13. The applicant should be present at the established public hearing date to present the proposed plans. ' City,of Renton . Planning Department 9/20/76 . r I EXECUTED as of the.day and year first above written. • TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, TRUSTEE • By: Its By Its .PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY By ` j a a r, Rea Estat Division • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF KING On this ''r' � day of c1 (/ / , 1977, before me personally appeared LESLIE A. DONNER, ,to. me known to be the Manager, Real Estate Division of PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, the corpor- ation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, - oath stated that he is authorized to execute said instrument. . 'EN under my hand and off'c' 1 seal the day and year last Ltten. N 7 Notary Public n a d or the S to f Washington, residing a STATE OF SS. • COUNTY OF On this day of , 1977, before me, the under- signed, personally appeared and , to me known to be the and respectively, of TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. • Notary Public in and for the State of , residing at • - 3 - • • .ate • gr •1111 .`may R�[ThEb 2, AFFIDAVIT /v APR 28 ly;; \ ��+47 4, Pam% I , 0 T7 j .s-•^,'"'��eing duly sworn, declare at i am the owner the propertj�involved in this application and that the foregoing st teinents and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of ny knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me• this ,,I g . day of 0 1J , 19 -7 S, • Jotary Public in and for the State of +lashington, residing at P-P,...j-0-7v ,1-04 • • 1 / • � . Yk CYl- (tJame of Notary Public) (.) ( gnature of Owner I 3c�c� S I (Der` -PQ . 2-‘ 0 1 k_ LJ Sfi Se-J .Address) (Address) PC-4d071 LOA .6 (City) (State)1gar • (Telephone) FOR OFFICE USE .ONLY) • CERTIFICATION • his is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me nd has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to onform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department overning the filing of such application . ate Received , 19 By : • • Renton Planning Dept .