Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-029 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE ariTgt ( fr/ 0- 9 fw io MiC " ITILMED OF RA, ighak- $y ® ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT z RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0,9 co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH.98055 • 235-2540 • 0,9gre0 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR MEMORANDUM DATE: March 25, 1985 TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk FROM: Jeanette Samek-McKague SUBJECT: Closed File, File Short Plat-029-80 and Waiver W-030-80 When the Hancheroff/Renton Elks Club Short Plat and waiver file was transmitted to your office, a letter was not sent indicating that the approval period had expired. Since then a new short plat has been approved and filed (see Short Plat-023-84, V-024-84). OF k11111 ;D © o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILI AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 90 FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 47- 6.0 SEP1- June 11 , 1980 Mr. George Xenos Professional Property Development 3000 N.E. 100th Seattle, WA 98125 RE: File No. Short Plat 029-80, W-030-80, E-043-80; Renton Elks Club. Dear Mr. Xenos: This is to notify you that the Examiner's decision regarding the above referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. You will recall that as a condition of approval of the requested waiver, the Examiner required the posting of a bond to ensure completion of the required off-site improvements on Benson Road S. The amount of the bond has been established in the amount of $35,000.00 by Richard Houghton, the city's Engineering Supervisor. The bond should be so worded to reflect that it will remain in perpetuity until such time as required off-site improvements are installed. Additionally, if you have not already done so, please contact the Planning Department regarding preparation of the short plat mylar which will be filed with King County following submission to the city. If we can further assist you in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Fred J. Mufman Hearing Examiner • cc: Planning Department City Clerk • 4 S INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date June 9, 1980 TO: Marilyn Peterson FROM: Richard Houghton SUBJECT: Renton Elks Club Bond for 0ffsite Improvements The bond amount for the offsite improvements is $35,000.00. Keep in mind that this bond is a continuous type. In other words as long as these improvements are not installed the bond will have to be kept in force. e(L4 RCH:pmp • • RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMID._R JUN 91980 AM PM ?18,9,10,1111?0 ,2,2,/i:,,6 A • . 11111 II/ AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 27th day of May , 19 80 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. -) Subscribed and sworn this _(i�, day of 19 \ • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton Application, Petition or Case: Renton Elks Club; Sh. Pl . 029-80 (The ►ni nu tea contain a £A4 t o 6 the panti,ea o 6 necond) SMay 27, 1980 OFFICE OF THE_ LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, APPLICANT: Renton Elks Club FILE NO. Sh. Pl. 029-80, W-030-80, E-043-80 LOCATION: West of the existing Renton Elks Club facility and east of Benson Road South. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a two-lot short plat on the subject site along with a request for an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow access to Lot No. 2 via an existing easement and a waiver of off-site improvements along Benson Road South. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval of short plat and exception; denial of waiver. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of short plat and exception; Approval of waiver subject to posting a bond. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received on REPORT: April 24, 1980, and a secondary revised report was received on May 15, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 29, 1980 at 10:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building for the purpose of review of a requested rezone of the subject property and accompanying short plat request (File No. R-028-80) . Due to the necessity of publication of both waiver and exception requests to be heard concurrently with the short plat application, the matter was continued by the Examiner to May 20, 1980. CONTINUATION: The hearing was opened on May 20, 1980 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1: Application File containing Planning Department. report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Short Plat as submitted Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: George Xenos Professional Property Development 3000 N.E. 100th Seattle, WA 98125 Mr. Xenos indicated concurrence in the Planning Department recommendations contained in the staff report. Regarding the recommendation to deny the requested waiver, he expressed hope that the Board of Public Works would grant approval of a request for deferral of the required off-site improvements since improvement of Benson Road at this time would be premature because elevations and location of curbs, gutters and sidewalks have not yet been determined. The Examiner inquired if the applicant had entered into agreements with various owners of the right-of-ways including power line easements for development of access and parking in Lot 1. Mr. Xenos indicated that agreements had not been executed. Mr. Blaylock advised Sh. P1. 029-80 Page Two that the Bonneville Power Administration (S.P.A.) must review and approve all proposed !development under the power lines. Mr. Xenos indicated that a request for use of the easement would be directed to the agency immediately. The Examiner inquired regarding the timing of improvement of Benson Road South, and whether improvement would occur within the maximum two year period allowed for deferral of off-site improvements. Mr. Blaylock noted that although the intersection of Puget Drive and Benson Road South would be completed within two years, it was unlikely that the portion of Benson fronting onto the property would be completed within that time frame. The Examiner suggested that approval of a waiver contingent upon execution of restrictive covenants to participate in a future LID may be more effective than approval of a deferral which would expire prior to the proposed improvement project. The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department representative. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. Short Plat 029-80, W-030-80 and E-043-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:20 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a two-lot short plat of +2.57 acres together with an exception for an easement access and a waiver of required off-site improvements. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, the subject proposal has been determined exempt from the threshold determination by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 7. The subject property was annexed into the city in two stages, the first in 1956 and the second in 1961. The Elks Lodge, on proposed Lot 2, was constructed in 1967. The site is the subject of a rezone petition which is currently pending before the City Council. In that action, the Hearing Examiner recommended that portions of the subject site be reclassified to B-1 (Business/Commercial) in order to unify the site under one zoning category. 8. The western portion of the subject site rises steeply above Benson Road and then levels off somewhat. The Elks Club is built on the eastern portion of the subject site. The applicant intends to construct a dental clinic on the western portion, proposed Lot 1. 9. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property pursuant to Section 9-1105 which permits the short subdivision of less than five lots. 10. The creation of proposed Lot 2, separate and apart from the westerly portion, Lot 1, would leave Lot 2 without frontage on a public right-of-way; therefore, the applicant has requested an exception to Section 9-1102.8 which provides that a lot must front on a public street. The exception was requested pursuant to Section 9-1109. 11. The applicant has requested a waiver of the required off-site improvements along Benson Road because that road's design, alignment and elevation may be changed in the near ,future. The Planning Department indicated that fire related water improvements must be accomplished prior to construction of the clinic. 12. Currently the subject property is served by an access easement across the Bonneville power line corridor to the south. The easement serves the entire lot via Eagle Ridge Drive. The property has been served by the easement since construction of the Elks Lodge in 1967. The easement is a 30-foot wide right-of-way which has a 20 foot paved surface. Bonneville and other power line owners have provided easements across property which would otherwise be landlocked, and similar easements are found in other areas of the city. SO Sh. . 029-80 Page Three 13. The applicant proposes access to Lot 1 via a driveway entering from Benson Road. The drive would enter the southwest corner of the subject property where the terrain is less steep. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed short plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The subdivision is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and with the pending zoning classification of B-1. The creation of the second lot as a buildable parcel will permit the establishment of a proposed dental clinic in this growing area of the city. 2. Under the conditions imposed on the pending rezone, the site will be heavily landscaped to comply with the greenbelt designation of the powerline corridor. 3. The requested exception will permit the continued access of the Lodge, Lot 2, via the easement across the powerline corridor from Eagle Ridge Drive. The exception will not grant the applicant a new or special privilege; it will formalize the condition which has been an acceptable solution for access to this lot for the last 13 years. Similar access easements that cross powerline corridors exist in the city, and therefore the applicant is not the recipient of a special privilege. Granting the easement will permit the applicant to make reasonable use of the subject property by permitting the establishment of two lots on this +2.57 acre parcel. 4. The requested complete waiver of off-site improvements is not justified. The waiver would permanently free the applicant of the obligation to improve this very busy arterial. Both lots which will result from the short plat will add considerable traffic and the applicant should be responsible for providing improvements for the safe passage of both vehicles and pedestrians. At the same time, the future design and layout and elevations of Benson Road are under study and it would be a useless endeavor to install the required improvements only to have to remove them if the future road is in a different alignment. Therefore, a waiver of the requirement subject to the posting of a bond to cover the full costs of installing the required improvements is appropriate. In this way, the improvements can be installed after the realignment of Benson Road. 5. Those improvements required to provide adequate fire flow are required prior to the construction of any additional structures on the site. DECISION: Exhibit #2 is approved subject to City Council approval of Rezone File No. R-028-80. The exception to provide an easement access to Lot 2 is approved. The waiver is approved subject to the posting of a bond in an amount sufficient to cover the design and installation of the required improvements including but not limited to sidewalks, gutter, curbs and street lighting. Notwithstanding the waiver, the project must provide adequate fire flow and such improvements necessary to accomplish that purpose. ORDERED THIS 27th day of May, 1980. -6-9• Gt.% Fred J. K man Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of May, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: George Kenos, Professional Property Development, 3000 N.E. 100th, Seattle, WA 98125 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of May, 1980 to the following: Mayor 'Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Sh. P1. 029-80 Page Four Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 10, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be pircmased at cost in said department. • PLANNING DEPARTIEENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 20, 1980 APPLICANT : RENTON ELKS FILE NUMBER : Short Plat 029-80 , W-030-80, E-043-80 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a 2-lot short plat on the subject site along with a request for an exception to the subdivision ordinance to allow access to Lot #f2 by an established easement and a waiver of off-site improvements along Benson Road South. B . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record : OFFICIALS OF THE RENTON ELKS) Hobe Allurine, Thomas Carlin, Neil White 2 . Applicant : RENTON ELKS 3 . Location : (Vicinity Map Attached) West of the existing Renton Elks Club and east of Benson Road South 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . 5 . Size of Property: t 2 .57 acres 6. Access : Via Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson Road South 7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1, General Classifi- cation District ; minimum lot size 35,000 square feet 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : GS-1 , R-4, B-1 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multiple Family 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing, date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on May 7 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by. City Ordinance on May 9, 1980. C. &9ISTORY/3,AC GROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1871 of March 8, 1961 and Ordinance ##1547 of. May 24, 1956 . The Elks Lodge was constructed in 1967. That • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , Short Plat 029-80,W-030-80 , E-043-80 MAY 20, 1980 PAGE TWO portion of the subject site not under the power lines was rezoned to B-1 by Ordinance #2059 on October 21, 1963 . A public hearing was held on the proposed rezoning of the subject site from GS-1 to R-3 on April 29 , 1980 . The Hearing Examiner recommended that the subject area involved with the rezoning application be rezoned to B-1 subject to limiting the parking development of the area under the power lines to a maximum of 50% along with the retention and addition of natural vegetation along Benson . The rezone application is now pending before the City Council . D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site rises fairly steeply from west to east, then levels off into a large plateau where the Elks Lodge is located. 2. Soils: Alderwood gravely sandy loam, 6-15% slopes (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to moderate and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, row crops and for urban development . Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15-30% slopes (Ag0) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is severe. This soil is used mostly for timber. 3. Vegetation: The natural vegetation is concentrated on proposed Lot #1. 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds. and small mammals. 5. Water: No surface water was evidenced on the site (4-11-80) . 6. Land Use : The existing Elks Club is located on proposed Lot #2 of the short plat . The remainder of the subject site is undeveloped. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: The surrounding properties are a mixture of undeveloped land, power transmission lines and rights-of-way, and . some condominiums. F . PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main runs east-west on Eagle . Ridge Drive and a 10" main runs in a northwestrly- southeasterly direction in the easterly portion of the property. 8" sanitary sewers are located on Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson Road. 2. Fire Protection: Provided by the Renton Fire Dept. per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #155 operates along Puget Drive South approximately 1 mile to the south of the subject site. 4. Schools : Spring Glen Elementary School and Fred Nelson Junior High School are both within mile to the south of the subject site while Renton Senior High School is approximately 1; miles to the north. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS, Short Plat 029-80 ,W-030-80, E-043-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE THREE 5. Recreation: Talbot Hill Park is approximately 1; miles to the southwest of the subject site. C. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 (C), General Classification District . 2 . Section 4-711 , Business District . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965, ,Pages 17-18, Objectives . 2 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105, Short Subdivisions. 3. Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1105.6B, Waived Improvements. 4. Subdivision Ordinance 9-1109, Exceptions. I . IMPACT ON. THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not directly impact the property. 2. Population/Employment : Minor . 3. Schools : Not applicable. 4. Social: Not applicable. 5. Traffic: No specific clinic plans have been submitted so the traffic impacts may be better addressed in a future Special Permit application. J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , the short plat is exempt from an environmental ' determination. K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division. 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Parks Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed short plat is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the present zoning designation for the subject site . The subject site is zoned B-1 and GS-1 under the power lines . If the Council concurs with the Hearing Examiner 's recommendation, then the entire site would be rezoned to B-1 . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPOR1 TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , Short Plat 029-80,W-030-80 ,E-043-80 MAY 20, 1980 PAGE FOUR 2. The applicant is requesting a two-lot short plat along with an exception to allow access to proposed lot #2 by an established easement . The easement was granted to the Renton Elks Lodge is unusual in that the 30 ' of right-of-way provided by the Department of Interior to the Renton Elks Lodge is in the form of a special agreement dated November 10, 1970. The access from Eagle Ridge Drive to the Lodge is completely contained within the property owned by the BPA. They have required that a 20 ' road be constructed on the 30 ' easement along with a provison that any modifications necessary because of power transmission line changes would be borne by the Elks Lodge . When the Lodge was constructed it was anticipated that they would access directly onto Benson Road South. However, the topographic features along Benson Road South suggest some limitations to access. Access in such cases should be limited and encouraged to integrate into the circulation system at major points. This access provided by the BPA does provide a. safer means for a large number of people accessing onto Benson Road via Eagle Ridge Drive ., This area of Renton is typically cross cut with major power line right-of-ways. In most cases, the BPA or the electrical utility company does not want a public street unerneath their right-of-ways. They would prefer to grant easements or enter into special agreements with individuals to provide access across the properties . Therefore , the exception is necessary to insure that properties cut-off from normal access patterns are not deprived of their right to develop because of their specific location to power line right-of-ways . Granting of the exception does not appear to be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties in the vicinity. This has been proved , in fact , because of the past operation of the Lodge over the last ten years utilizing this access . 3. The applicant has requested the waiver of improvements along Benson Road South . The applicant is probably basing their request upon the fact that Benson Road South is designated as a temporary state route and a major city arterial . However, the burden of improving the arterials should not be solely upon the city. The developing property owners along 'the right-of-way should be responsible for constructing normal improvements for a two-lane road including the curbs and sidewalks. The City . should not waive the requirement for improvements along Benson Road. Eventhough it is recognized that the design concept for this section of Benson Road South has not been completed and the elevations are unknown. The applicant can bond for the property after obtaining a deferral of his portion of those improvements. That estimate would be made by the Public Works Department. Fire protection cannot be. waived because it is a life/safety matter and any improvement to the water utility would have to be completed prior to the construction of any new buildings. . HANCHEROFF SHORT PLAT • IN THE WEST HALF OF SEC, 20• TWP. 23, RGE. SE.. W M. RENTON, KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON rielf.Al IC... •a*ra 1� • t..ltl•141 t1 171 tort.11 rant..:ts,'..a's.al4 is .e..ao•ne..•1:^.dd.,ltl ntinr•I,•41•D1. ' 1Y C��+�uM o1 to ,.r. ,y D.rrD a le a" fMrl 4u1. *Of el"Pal.0-•I eo lCd .e I7 0(0 e.d•.a 1•r.its.start Tat l•t.f•a ro/ryrsu•nt t✓.,sate Oat:•Id f••Gr.is r,I•..I to en•1 tncrl r it,.r l.lon It wd,•It1 In, Irr,ao.senl••1 I.at. ----------- --,.—---- turdf•c•at.ln•re4v.ortn•owrlsl- I••It•tta Nitre,'•r nave tel ay,Mne{and 1.11•. tell ,,,eve 9:.'!.-".E-:•T�cF .•2�cf!;� � ,N f.:,:,r,* � Ar•1550C9f, .,PW'ss v gyps - . l --a ..- ,�. .. Jl11'' �'''�lI • poop re., ' r.•.i'4ii .. 1' + .y pvs 11 -. New '.lYn opt I .4.7ef le._ _—� .,�' >. . ei y5_. _•;�t r>rs/aa� lisleusrp - L. lue x•7J••T(t • ` b{ 9 ACra.MlcL:7rRT • . A \-:" � t75 p 6O SPOOF Of Yt:aI1LTTr) h.• We _— 0LL6i,OF 1I6G 1•I • . ( nn...Z�� OI 7). vents .j�` Toils Is to terra,tot on tn. .0 d.p OP/An�ef--__ If10,D.forr.e eeslgr.d.•11Dt.. Pu •tt -*4 1.1..A/i aJ; I. I r ✓ II..•' Ll 1 D11-- r,nop111P•D; d and 7•.s r 1 '•'✓ L •Le<Li.el�.01• •r.N-_sL'I`_{rl{.[-�../••L_•na-sAld?rr,�1•.•Ye.4/- CD iL •rsA+,G-� I \.^t ,2 �!t.. spot �( - iie:ntn-,tcn tcrfOnt.o.,law morn to t.(Ri Inellsedv11f,T•14 tttt(Ord int alM. .•[l ..c1.r•t ten•RQ ec6nn•Iadg.1 to d St., tMp IIS.rd•n0 4a•l.d 1•e tare at tattle �••vf.p. ��, a?` A,--' tr�. .t,�: .,s.,•t.rt•et .••d errd /or tM.sr•.no Durgs.s tt.el.•.ntloned end n tall _ o, ., r I stetrA t`.•c t•tp.err.utnort..I t•.teeule sill sot t.. nt•M tM 5,11 : • `a • ! `��_ �' t•.. (If..,1 IS tat.Lnr Arft•foal•f tell carport lee. Y:T.(SS•p 6.n0 ant.flsllal 1 Te+ 3 • ..• 1 r• :tat t•.dap.na pa.,nrtt.boat • t, / _ . 1 (•• •'k • i t.'.• it • ��`/Y�� ..... I •••r "of•.,�•rDt % �.�%1I Io r• r:-ci;alnttnd- �6 1 I res14.1f•t•,...4._� ✓ r,•e•..ml f--`..I:cos ate to,I..NUN,1. t°T / ------- ---—- • '- c. 1` ~� Z , •ry i Pn: ..bet ply, err. rtc•...,...Dose D;.r u-... •:.a4f .- 1 j' -..1- t :,! ...t , ~ et.prior . .•d:«e� .s...ore plat .• .:u ; t•.1 tow • S.•t..n Co.... ,ry.� le. .^ „ i _t.�•e o•.r..rn•.'r.gair.v. •i:•r.D N City. Ar• \- 1;\ J L,6R/.5.. m r . Cyr t.•..... LP6R9_ 04.00`c C; N.:. `r L tt,;.;- ce-_;r(ua a;r. - -' �'r————\ " % r f7LI01C,t(C.+D _L r`'- a ----- - ---.;Row •.D. lr( t et N. _ la etc. • 1 I.l'i __ cr:t,ors CS r0 1 _ -- AT tt, C.;.,I;7 01 I /� 0i " ---_--.__ ___. -_Al:Ids COOL Or 905105. •4Il so giL • •ISCrl.ltCt • " . - •at .-. Y w .el • a r,.n•if of tetti 70,fon.nip 7S.b _•••n6,song•S(aft. :,al a o ;.,Co•,t,.va,nipton•I.sar.6ad a.folios: __ Ie1o1,(5 Ay Arf i:::aL flail(.r. :ng at try.••t toner aMMr of sail septic.; IM«a•\5•a6.OS"1•lops --"__--D•r M"_-__._.._.--_-_•.0. 1)DO .4•1 Ii--t .of•di•••no•of 777.51 fret t•'(ne• .tl,...eve.of Pa F,•nifty I..era: .,telly..7M Iwt D.anlo• S..t,l.y l ran.ni.sit..•.Set-r. ----- a•dnar itrd,:n nsit...vnt,corded..dry Auditor•••.i•M. I:f?L'-6, DI AI L1Ce D1PI.0r rLfI IC SOCKS • ore•of.i.5(o.ntr.unniyten: (6.n..val•77•a9•.( •lo^f sad sc.r.•!• ...ors:.656 6f fret 1••pint note•N tat.P,.ra Ioiw.of Peginn:+g of 1 Ira.1 a1D an0 alto C.[D f•If-- DAfor---- 75•s dnt.•Drd n•Iro..nl . ore.d oodrr A•ditot••r:le•o. 61S:Ua,••e•d• A.D. ry2o of Ring Co.ntr.WMinglt.n.said.saint•Ito trip"Om POINT Of•1{•n\1..G ors l«• -_— •data it••peat; snonta•07•s{•11•V 100.00 feet: .Moss tl7.71•a9'>r 6l}el7!rot 10: n•egin of Nnsen+oad al•pint on In• 1(!\:tW(• • of•t r•she tamer•P...cf.sears•DI•17•sr(7EI5.00 heI•l : Inert• (1ar.uCD 1,3 Arfst.10 T.•S Dal or twtnaely•long.old, rrlt fin•.d•l ...to Ord of said t •t•Ina A.D. (9t..� I ea tMo.s•.• o'ttal . . ong pl. 7•71.75•'•n•c a• r 171-b Ire.40• point of ta.S•n<., tn.«te toot i.u•«g•Ions said tnfrgi•ft{•1{tC its - 717 St fort to%ta 1t•.eft..1 Inat 170 fool strip of lend•npieed rt Rn\.\;CtrC(tOA n swot a w -clap al: 7 u/0.«...nit'. corded caner.Au.i.e•'s rN,b. 1•NI\• o\:►r r.O.10 tots Car Cf . --- - •D. Ism St!7I'0.. o..•A••np(Celnl,.v.n,,hi o.: meat:.Va^IS•IT•(•t.,. s•:. -.- --------- o•V.rl,-stoat Lf1 t0 feat to• II-o .nits e•."SO7•I{•11"t Ire.I.. of t•1 ,.••.:.r•.os. tn.^ta aO:•It••I rev w0 oe Ira. to 1M IOInT Gf•IAI•.Itti. _ .-_ _- •IS:;:.Lt,AS•11LOa • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: RENTON ELKS , Short Plat 029-80,W-030-80, E-043-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE FIVE M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the foreging analysis , it is recommended that the applicant ' s request for a short plat , File No , 029-80 and exception request , File E-043-80 be approved and that the request for a waiver W-030-80 be denied . I , ' ,:. ..... / .„, .„.... „.... • 4--- :. .....- ,,, vi) / - \7 . ..,66.4:-..1 1, %, It% \ s• • „,/ / ,' i�' / "� ;.. .....,... i • i•f 1 : Sli?:T PLAT 0�9-80 RENTON ELKS /I • '', •/ • t (yr�+.1——'`_, t f 11 1 AER N-030-80. LODGE . 4. ri'r •..t. J _.x:.•.7:'.-.-''g it 1 a>M1� `` EXCEPTION E-043-80 • \ 1 I .._ r Ri - ; ; • ; ` , `, ,z`.- t& 'fit \ . 1 ` t `\ \ \ `— •�r 4+ Awn,a fk . 0‘‘, ' - °sue _ _i ,/ en ,AO O.6.A 'v .i_7l ,•` ,\. • t � x rt• —j1'o �1`r' \_ -- 1 try' 1 9,` s.... „\ %, - C•••••C&..'''''' -•-4"..././.-0".-.P.--...."-'-'.•-A'34sS...."'..-,•r.,,,.e.0e,..,., ►. • eso , f .,. 0 \ �JT \, ,.r 414... r. ..t,ti \ P:; : \ :::TING -_ _ __TE: : % _ . - :0...2.1 , _ __-.. ..z.... , , ,_...._. ;• ., i ..., . ....-__ ,„. .. . . s.t... 0.,„. ., 2.. „ ....._- ...... ., --..._,,-__ _. . . , ..__ ........ I. t, • ``- s. 4 .� •�� LOT 2 --...I, ----- Ali-% li-- -77iiii.74,....-_-2-z_________- AO�ot-.•,910 -- --�� - =rr^—� \ \ ..7....., rvF.�'' - - ` ~I� +zX• `cxw.fi, =•a.s»:t. r:..a•=c a�,x»... . .,sr-...3.,�..e. .rF _ r0 . -..... 1...\,,. .,_ .,... c _ ..--___ 41... i a sz �� _ - = . _ __ avg.E O9R „ ! - ' oi( — \ \ i -- LOT I � .._ �� ^ i'z_�� _ � 9IOw i 7,5i/g6 Planking 410 MOW 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ast. s'r DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 06 v.-% )r&irdr Application : Rexime(A... oI(9'S rv.3 ot off A1A T'p 9) ci'lalwr( - o3®- ) 6-•- 14/. Location : t%®iwct pea &tics �,j''Dtre0.7 Ariaee LJJ 3i Applicant: &Jew, tf t 04, TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 9/.�5�/80 Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : 07,440. Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI G FOR THE APPLICATION Tor CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON OpeRTMENT/DIVISIOrREPRESMATNE 9:UU THETHIRD FLOORCONFERENCE ROOM. IF WILL NOT ABLE T A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE P VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON q,�i6/9" REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : y` c/l Z—oe Approved A Approved with Conditions Not Approved ihr_c�� /t fl / ( .L�] .1.4-+�-C dt g . / r�y171 /off Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : • V" Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved �/ / , ^._ •1 • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date • : `�®��VO Planning • 1111/ MOP 12-1979 • RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT SJ DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET fr p4Ael . Appli cation: 1 gone 0e1,9-PO cs-144.3 4 4forfAfaits71-P 9) eilittivortliti-•030-R9 601,-. f241,6 Location: fig, Le g.„ &`6 trein 'ep? italeamtet) ea . Applicant:_ offistdori 4' r ex..g • • TO: Parks Department . SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : �/.2 1/843 Police Department • A.R.C. MEETING DATE : 0,4PA?) Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering • • Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI ►G FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9: 0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF sGRD ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ ATTEND THE ARC, E P SE♦P� VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON �� �+� • • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : .-71. i /c', . 1),-- - 1'„,..-,„f,./t ,:-:,t j-? - Approved r% Approved with Conditions Not Approved .a ,- !-,72/0/l iL . •c /1.4_,.l /y?l`;_ ., iI (..)_',_.%l S c'/`>11 i /;C'5 1, :.( /./ i ' 1.i 2 : (� L ••C. /( . • i, � C . ✓ ),` '„ -' .•C : J ',.1 �:1� •�! /, S[•l/[ /,)//� r'c J.1 , C/( //CN. �k / r, ' 1..t... fi . :C .'� . . /L_ /'A,_ y / /,'/,./ /) ./...-:. ./ ,--,'/ .% /, <! 77///<- -'i /f '/_ ')' . VL C'; / ;A ;_''C. • ,-1 ar_ �_ %.) i' ' "?' ` /', {-?' - / 1 ! i'c.-/__1' L%/:/L: /(_- /;i:/ .•4 T . ' t i1 Signature of Director 'or Authorized Representative Date i REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : j,iiiti r ar ' Approved = Approved with Conditions Not Approved • U 1/ 5‘ Ft 4:-L,prc-11.- Sr 06,- co,:•z0.4 . v►/y 4 %-c Sd"/�i! • �/ 7 • ' pu) ..iTi- .cc•1.i 5 fk•'iL.=�• h N i &i' (3 c-fac' an L.1.1 ;.2 M,9,Al ' 1 n • , I) 0)0 f,4.,-)4.,"--'A. .,:\/ '. __...A614^---: c( 1 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date f 7f wig) Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ci rit DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SEE ` ;tiiv* Application :Rezmte OoAt9'9 6S '1 # 4.3 .\5604rIPP/mIt f-R 9) rsocor(0- 030-59 6,Nor- cs2 4 As Location : _w t14 .L I6 tdi-en-fen (%' e e6 ' O Applicant : kEusippi TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : �0�l'BQ Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : 0070 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI G FOR THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT Y:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF UDARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQA TEND THE ARC, PLE . SE P'IVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ra pic givGlivn piv. Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved 77f/5 A 614 / /( A to AP r,a A, cale 7#1,61G iry tom:lax.. et/t:34 y y 1. R6 v pm Pc, T• cov/ pv44. 0 ds/Te .�' a 4oV6b E VT, n vex), out c if ,,to 4'a . I -4 (i 44".1.444,11.6 •etr- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1 -` ,A Approved _ Approved with Conditions Not Approved /;;;7 / _Lam- -� �! "7 «c) Si nature of Director or Authorized Representative Date O PLaININIING DEPART0EINT PRELa'4IINMY REPORT TO THE HEARINDG EXA'INIEfR PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 29, 1980 APPLICANT : RENTON ELKS FILE NUMBER : R-028-80, Short Plat 029-80, W-030-80 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from GS-1 to R-3 and a 2-lot short plat on the subject site. A clinic is proposed for the future use of the newly created lot . B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record: HOBE ALLURINE , THOMAS CARLIN, NEIL WHITE 2 . Applicant : RENTON ELKS 3.. Location : (Vicinity Map Attached) West of the existing Renton Elks Club and east of Benson ' Road South 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5. Size of Property: *2 . 57 acres 6. Access : Via Eagle Ridge Drive 7 . Existing Zoning: GS-1, General Classifi- cation District ; minimum lot size 35 ,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: GS-1, R-4 , 8-1 9. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multiple Family, Greenbelt 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on April • 16, 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on April 11 , 1980. C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinances #1871 of March 8, 1961 and Ordinance #1547 of May 24, 1956 . The Elks Lodge was constructed in 1967. That portion of the subject site not under the power lines was rezoned to B-1 by Ordinance #2059 on October 21 , 1963. • • 4110 PLANNING DE PARTIOP PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS, R-028-80, Short Plat 029-80 ,W-030-80 APRIL 29, 1980 PAGE TWO D. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site rises fairly steeply from west to east, then levels off into a large plateau where the Elks Lodge is located. 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravely sandy loam, 6-15% slopes (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to moderate end the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries , row crops and for urban development . Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15-30% slopes (AgD) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is severe . This soil is used mostly for timber. 3. Vegetation : The natural vegetation is concentrated on proposed Lot #1 . 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water: No surface water was evidenced on the site (4-11-80) . 6. Land Use: The existing Elks Club is located on proposed Lot #2 of the short plat. The remainder of the subject site is undeveloped. E. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are a mixture of undeveloped land, power transmission lines and rights-of-way , and some condominiums. F . PUi:;LIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main runs east-west on Eagle Ridge Drive and a 10" main runs in a northwestrly- southeasterly direction in the easterly portion of the property. 8" sanitary sewers are located on Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson Road. 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Dept. per ordinance requirements. 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #155 operates along Puget Drive South approximately z mile to the south of the subject site. 4. Schools: Spring Glen Elementary School and Fred Nelson Junior High School are both within z mile to the south of the subject site while Renton Senior High School is approximately 1; miles to the north. 5. Recreation: Talbot Hill Park is approximately 11/4 miles to the southwest of the subject site. G. . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-729(C) , General Classification District . H. APPLICAAE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENiSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965, pages 17-18, Objectives. 2. Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105, Short Subdivisions. 3. Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 .6B, Waived Tmnrnuort,m.,i•., 1110 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS, R-028-80, Short Plat 029-80,W-030-80 APRIL 29 , 1980 PAGE THREE I . IMPACT C . THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not directly impact the property. 2. Population/Employment : Minor . 3 .. Schools: Not applicable. 4. Social : Not applicable. 5. Traffic : No specific clinic plans have been submitted so the traffic impacts may be better addressed in a future Special Permit application. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on April 2 , 1980. The short plat is exempt from an environmental determination. K. , AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2. City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Parks Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: (Rezone) 1 . The proposed rezone to R-3 is not specifically consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of high density multiple family residential and greenbelt for the subject site. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan was to retain the areas under majdr power transmission lines as open space and greenbelts. Development under these lines would hive to appear to fulfill the goals of the Comprehensive Plan designation of greenbelt . In this specific case, the Renton Elks Lodge is bounded do two sides by high power transmission lines . The front portion of the site adjacent to the Benson Highway is developmentally limited by those high power transmission lines. The proposal is to develop that area not under the lines in a dental clinic and use the area under the lines for auxiliary parking to the dental facility .. It would appear that parking and the greenbelt designation of the Comprehensive Plan are compatible if the intensity of the parking is severely reduced to emphasize the greenbelt theme. This would suggest an unusually high percentage of landscaping in relationship to the total site. The Parking and 1111 1111 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: RENTON ELKS , R-028-80, Short Plat 039-80,W-030-80 APRIL 29 , 1980 PAGE FOUR Loading Ordinance requires that any parking lots over 10,000 square feet have a minimum of 5% of the parking area in landscaping. With the primary intent of the Comprehensive Plan to use the area as greenbelt , it would appear that the parking would have to be auxiliary to the greenbelt designation. If only half of the total area was utilized for parking and the other half was extensively landscaped , it would create the appearance of meeting the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 2 . The majority of the subject site was rezoned to B-i by Ordinance 2059 on October 21, 1963. The Elks Lodge was subsequently built in 1967 . Those portions of the site under the high power transmission lines were left in a GS-1 classification and not rezoned to B-1. The subject site , under the power lines , has not been considered for a rezone since the property was annexed into the City in 1956 (Section 4-3014-A) . A dental clinic could be constructed on that portion of the site presently zoned B-l .as an allowed use. Auxiliary parking could be allowed on those portions of the site under the transmission lines if the property was rezoned to R-3. Normally auxiliary parking lots are on separate , adjacent parcels. The one parcel, proposed Lot #1 , would contain two zoning classifications and would not follow under the procedures of Section 4-2204(3) (C) (2) as in the regent case of the Boeing Parking Lot #11 . Therefore the design review would take place at the building permit application stage by the Planning . Department . 3. On November 8, 1971 a portion of the power line right-of-way designated as greenbelt in the Comprehensive Plan was rezoned to R-4 under Ordinance 2675. The property lies immediately west of the subject site on the other side of the Benson Highway. This' would appear to suggest that there is no definite policy established to limit the use of greenbelt areas for vegetation as long as the intent of the greenbelt area is met it would appear that compatible uses could be permitted. 4. • No buildings can be constructed under the powerline. right-of-ways. Development will be limited to parking. M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: (Rezone) It is recommended that the request for a rezone from GS-1 to R-3, Medium Density Multiple Family Residential, File No. R-028-80, be approved subject to the filing of restrictive covenants to limit the maximum lot coverage (parking and paved areas) of the site to 49%. The other 51% is to be covered in extensive landscaping plantings to fulfill the intent of the greenbelt designation. Ink PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: RENTON ELKS, R-028-80, Short Plat 039-80, W-030-80 APRIL 29, 1980 PAGE FIVE L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: (Short Plat) 1. The applicant has submitted a short plat which does not provide direct access onto a public street from Lot #2. Lot #2 is presently developed with the Renton Elks Lodge and access is provided over an easement across P.S.P. & L . right-of-way . The applicant will have to correct the application and request an exception of the Subdivision Ordi- nance to allow access to Lot #2 by easement rather than the required frontage on a public street . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : (Short Plat) The Planning Department recommends that the public hearing. . for File No . Short Plat 029-80 and waiver request W-030-80 be continued until the proper application for an exception is submitted and advertised. Proper legal notices can be placed in the newspaper to allow the_.public hearing to continue on Tuesday, May 13th. • *lr % t dw l t r, y... tt •x j 1 •"' 1 �• '\ lir.V: .• ;41i pr, ! i it 'All : It ' . ? . V-ji-- H....1 ' , , I-g: th--,,tr.tigivt It , , „ ► ;St ilt �n ,I I tif Ii-�! it ;t ► 1{1— :,,_ , 3 �..�• » \ II ..?t Ira i , is.....17, i .,„, A .... , ti-ti - 1 , .. -- it • r d 1---4. ,, ,,,,,„„._,„,F4t•%• ; 11 1 {.II I p ' % ‘, • i'. GS-. ,,,-----= %.-05:41 L., ' .1g; , ' — ......" • 04 • '4 .. • e f-I t 0© {•0:D 1 . • 1 {► Q 'D •`P.5 n ::.1 -.0 .,,,: He.' 1,.:! , .. . . ,, . -------- .. _._ . ,,, , „ ..„ , .,,,. , ..,.. . .• i. , , , .........._______------ _..-- , ...... ..... ,. - - , , ;-: 4,N . 1.,", ,4 4 1 ' `•• , . . .. - -.. • . - _.-• 4, .:..,"•• N4, ;.I.;,.../;•••''' ' ''... '.• • lit • rr- • is , - ,I-k- p,;,., % , "1::P.1,, gli? ,.. :.-- am 4, ' .-... t. _ __*,../ .. i. VI U r-- ', '1r . 1110,2114. ',S0 .. , . . . . . .. GS.. I 0 Y 'T ► , ` 4. i. .%•... ,400.00,,.. ,m,,,,,protr-- :ma. .41i—§ '14—r:' 11.1 ' . , 1 ! o. tit, _...,,,-......p9.. --ft 's, , I 49 ,0 44, ,,,, ,,.. . ' 7. A , ,+�, m r 0 Cal LEO.i ,. -i ' t s: alio ,: ,....4: R, % ''' 1 ' M ti Cib ell A"C115r" • ily"0 1 lit f �� a1 , :., ,,--, - . -, % 04 ��• :"-**,-., . ....4 M ,A R-I a\� 09 \ \ . ; - 1�.itiolarspo7�,,�tI N .. W b • Q • ol r - ; -t 7• - '", - :ale:- ®� OQ4p II 1 k •. „ S r, (u��� • . .4•„ '•• - •• r . ,1 y �: • ,, ,` GS` ',I ----}:-:-./ il G" '.:i00 'I . 1 i ‘`.% APPLICANT RENTON ELKS TOTAL AREA +2.57 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS VIA EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE EXISTING ZONING GS\-1 , General Classification District EXISTING USE Existing Elks Club located on proposed Lot #2; the remainder undeveloped. PROPOSED USE Clinic COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family; Green- Deft COMMENTS , 1; I. , . . 3: 51/e Planni n dm 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ):0,14A APPlication: e .con 4 AAPir ® f6S /A A ' 10foviN�ell f•.P‹ 61A0 Ofi 030.4)64,10e,S Locati on: 47ogittlecten Petts.km IfReptiviy? ArZeb,cfre age • tMesia) • Ap p l i ca n t: ANNAit`,ro rags C4 A , TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATELaKTAN Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : 0.7/14)._ Public Works Department ; Engineering Division . • 1 Traffic Engineering Building Division 4 ? Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICAT/ION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI G FOR THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE \ARC) TO BE HELD ON IF af,,//yy AT 9:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. fARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T ATTEND THE ARC, Pj��EE SE P ,,QQ,,VIDE THE COMMENT' TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : / • Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved . .tee `j _ • I . 4-1'1 egy Y/FO Signature of Dfr.ector or Authorized 6► eepresentative,.• Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �� �� Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved / j S cgnatur o ' D hector or Author ied Representative Date 7f Mfg) riannin� 12-1979 SO RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT J S DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Appiication :Rezoa�gAp 0elg•�® fss'/A54• 4 r404/L677-Er • • Location: „" ter e t;ICCU f ;4nnle d4 ' t 'e .,;` r' 0 4 / CA ift090_ Applicant: ,,� � �,: ,, TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : f0 1/84 Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE: ict / Y 0 Public Works Department Engineering Division , Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering `, . __.. ....- .... Fire Department (Other) : , COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI G FOR THE APPLICATION RFV EW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON _ AT J:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF O ARTMENTIDIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE P VIDE THE COMMENTS TO.THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:0IJ P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /� � c�> - � lor %ice / ;c Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved !a P.-)iC''`c';c r�c j it'V , , , `J"�//� SC,���//C_v /S! �C; � c1 / l /,t r!i! /1/it.�C_ C ciiL.:S .;c'e' (1 <,fl-/(/!d'/t� /t'C:�/i /,/i'!"/J /c'/ii/ F,/.cq; /// i;' 'e tiL G'C t' C 1 `—_ (.0//?l-[_. /`":i C / /C-C /,'/ 1 ;':C'/ n�(� �'Ci.0)�-J /t c'✓c".4)1/ /A 4.. S �4 ,. � - .K / Signature- o Directorsor Au orized-Representative bate REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : brrtl.l Y art Approved -/ Approved with Conditions Not Approved . O 1 t SW . Ft i.✓pri,2r 57s {k✓. ca,nce, . v I/54 -t sd•✓en , ciTY firth !,'LTG -•CU ` S fk,at,45:K-t!NT CX a�Nc,4a 20 wAtt2 •tot a ' 0/.) op„ l i Signature o Director or Authorized Representative Date - , • `�© I Pl ahni nc 12-1979 O j RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEE g:�-''''� rAppli ca ti on:Rexpittia. 04194 TS./ $4.3 laortWe s: is C a;wrt�• p 0-P+0) '(�r .2��A3 iL o c a t i on: 9weBoviliVegAm Acarpm gig- r eptse@a Nofillee igoetilLaMicl) 'APP1icant: es.*4001 1kgr e�� TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE :, 74?`,,/C Police Department A.R.C. MEETING DATE : 0-1/1-42 • Public Works Department Engineering: Division Traffic Engineering .\. . . Building Division - ..._.- Utilities Engineering •v _____ Fire Department • (Other) : `, •I COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIDIG FOR THE APPLICATION REV EW CONFERENCE tARC) TO BE HELD ON (-v✓ AT J:UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. ff IF D ARTMEN.T/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE Tp AITEND THE ARC, PLEASEOLEASE_PMVIDE THE COMMENTS T0'•THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY .7:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 771N40A G eevG taezSeiA/4„ Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved MMfiA ss Au A Ici€TioAi of 776` c/ry tootie.t 1164 OS r/e L a pop aav r ova ley e.t, PF--S iTE .�'pi orgy e e�r r� r rely .14vcl /4 ovGA/ 0 L 708® Signature of Director or Authorized RepresentaAt41.4AA4.‘4,..7"e Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : �� Approved withConditions Not Approved � Approved Ar d • cC3 nature of Director or Authorized Representative e Date --- -- P FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No: R-028-80 Environmental Checklist No:. ECF-554-80 Description of 'Proposal: Application for rezone from OS-1 to R-3 to Proponent: RENTON ELKS CLUB a dental clinic Location of Proposal: Between existing Elks Building and Benson Road Lead Agency: City of Renton This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 2, 1980 following a presentation by David R. Clemens of the Planning Department. Oral comments were. accepted from: GORDON Y. ERICKSEN suggested that this application require site approval by the Hearing Examiner,. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-554-80 are the_ following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: DAVID R. CLEMENS, Senior Planner, dated April 1, 1980 2) Applications : REZONE R-028-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: MOVED by Warren Gonnason to issue declaration of non- significance, SECONDED by Gordon Ericksen and carried unanimously. Acting as the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this develop- ment does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C, 030 2 was ma after review by the lead agency of a complete)environmentalion checklistde and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for the declaration of non-significance: The subject proposal will be of such scope as to adversely impact the project site. SIGNATURES: 1 / John E. Webley, Director / . AA' Parks & Recrea ion DircnoYe"Ericksen, Planning / -7-)2r1 Directbr Z � f Warren G. Gonnason,Director Public Works Department Form 81 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING, C. BELL being duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington; that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the annexed, being a Retail ad , was published in said newspaper, and not in a 5cv7rf Zo•✓E supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the issue of said paper on the following day or days April 16 , 1980 SovTN Zo& and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to its1subscribers during all of said period. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON ' A public hearing will be held by the Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers,City Hall,Renton,Wash- ington,on April 29,1980,at 9:00 A.M.to Consider Me following petitions: 1. Kohl excavating (Kohl-Chrlstianson Addi- Subscribed and sworn to before me this — Twenty-Second __ _pia Hon), applications for preliminary Plot y Li approval for 7-lot single family detached development,File PP-008.80,and exception of May 1n 80 to subdivision ordinance regarding Pipes. tem lots,File E-033.10;property located at ., S.W.Sunset Blvd.and S.W.3rd Place. . 2.Schneider Construction Company(Hilltop),ap tar -lons fo family preliminary Plot approval Notary Public In end for the State of Washington for 20-lot single family detached develop- reading of Seattle ment and Tract 1 (later to be developed as multi-family), File PP-023.80, and excep- tion to subdivision Ordinance regarding Pi- pestem, lots, File E-031-80;property locat- ed South of N.E.6th St.and east of Monroe Ave.N.E. 3.The Boeing Company,oppticotlon,for Site approval for installation of 10'x32 troller for use as dispatch office in M-P Zone,File SA- 027.80;property located on site of Building 2,Benoroya Business Pork,000 S.W.43rd. 4. Renton Elks Club, application for rezone from GS-1 to R-3 to construct Dental Clinic, File R-028.80; property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Road, 5.Renton Elks Club, a0pllfwtlon for two-) frEf� ' Plot en er.voi (*fondant! nEikatlubay■ 4.City of Renton, applications for two-lot Short Plot approval,File 0e0.80,and excep- Hon to subdivision ordinance regarding lot .� the public File a-are opery of the in r- O� h� Pluse area in BlockH 46 o the 2, f^� w rectetl Plot of the Renton Highland No. 2 which isi bounded by.Harrington Pt. N.E., ` ��nf I+�1�D O Harrington Ave.N.E.and N.E.12th6}, ItIjIL I I. Legal descriptions of files noted above are on Me in Me Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETI Nee - TIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT p1 THE PUBLIC HEARING ON April 29, 1980,at �Uld 3 1980 t:00A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y.ERICKSEN, Renton Planning Director 21.4.11 ,� wM....—....—....�.......... 2 Published:April 16,1980 ,,f12t r9 !.- kr C¢� �I4'G DEFA� . . a Form 81 11111 IP Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON, ss. COUNTY OF KING, C. BELL tieing duly sworn, says that she is the principal Clerk of Seattle Times Company, publisher of THE SEATTLE TIMES, a daily newspaper, printed and published in Seattle, King County,State of Washington;that it is a newspaper of general circulation in said County and State; that it has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of King County; that the annexed, being a Retail ad , was published in said newspaper, and not in a Se af?1 Zo.✓6 supplement thereof, and is a true copy of the notice as it was printed in the regularenti're issue of said paper on the following day or days M a v 7 , 1980 $13 . 0 8 ,sew z. a and that the said newspaper was regularly distributed to itsA subscribers during all of said period. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON,WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS,CITY HALL,RENTON,WASHING- TON, ON MAY 20, 1900, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS:1. RENTON ELKS CLUB, APPLICATIONS Subscribed and sworn to before me this second day FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVE- MENTS,File W-030.00,AND EXCEPTION TOTHE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO of rill ly , 1�0 ' I ALLOW ACCESS BY EASEMENT,File E- 043-s0; property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Rood. 2. BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SPE• Wary f:� Me et Washington PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE, File SP-011.110;Property locat- ed on the east side of Lind Ave.S.W.,550 feet north Of S.W.34th St. 3. BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY,APPLICATION FOR SITE AP- PROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 72,370 SO. FT. WAREHOUSE/OFFICE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE, File SA-012-00;Property located on the east side of Lind Ave. S.W., 650 feet _. �� `J __ f �f li north of S.W.34th St. 4. MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES, APPLICA- TION FOR REZONE FROM G-9600 TO R•2 I FOR PURPOSE OF FUTURE CON- STRUCTION OF 26 TOWNHOUSE DU- PLEXES, File R-037-00; property located • in the vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington • Blvd. N.E. (Tract 181), adtocent to end north of S.E.76th St. Le9o1 descriptions of files noted above are z on file in the Renton Planning Deportment. - i ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- SENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 20,1960,AT 9:00 A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. - PUBLISHED:May 7,1900 GORDEN Y.ERICKSEN, i w �� RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR / _ _. .\ X—„0". (1) \ . E D -------2 — — • irf.--Ot 1111 &�c.-a.�. f-&i —a /k,4u,4 — 1.%/.030 10 It o THE CITY OF RENTON 4$ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o rn BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,0 `O• FRED J. KAUFMAN, 235-2593 0 91 TFD SECA°4' June 11 , 1980 Mr. George Xenos Professional Property Development 3000 N.E. 100th Seattle, WA 98125 RE: File No. Short Plat 029-80, W-030-80, E-043-80; Renton Elks Club. Dear Mr. Xenos: This is to notify you that the Examiner's decision regarding the above referenced request has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. You will recall that as a condition of approval of the requested waiver, the Examiner required the posting of a bond to ensure completion of the required off-site, improvements on Benson Road S. The amount of the bond has been established in the amount of $35,000.00 by Richard Houghton, the city's Engineering Supervisor. The bond should be so worded to reflect that it will remain in perpetuity until such time as required off-site improvements . are installed. Additionally, if you have not already done so, please contact the Planning Department regarding preparation of the short plat mylar which will be filed with King County following submission to the city. If we can further assist you in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Fred J. Mufman Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk N INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Date June 9, 1980 TO: Marilyn Peterson FROM: Richard Houghton SUBJECT: Renton Elks Club Bond for 0ffsite Improvements The bond amount for the offsite improvements is $35,000.00. Keep in mind that this bond is a continuous type. In other words as long as these improvements are not installed the bond will have to be kept in force. /A.4 RCH:pmp • RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER JUN 9 1980 AM PM 71819,10111112W2131415)6 A a AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J . Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 27th day of May , 19 80 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this 41 day of l'h 19 (c . \) . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Renton • Application, Petition or Case: Renton Elks Club; Sh. Pl. . 029-80 (The minutes contain a tint 06 the pail iea off. 'moo/Ed) k 411 a__eb May 27, 1980 cCn //7 aftY OFFICE_ OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXA1 INER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION . APPLICANT: Renton Elks Club FILE NO. Sh. P1. 029-80, W-030-80, E-043-80 LOCATION: West of the existing Renton Elks Club facility and east of Benson Road South. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a two-lot short plat on the subject site along with a request for an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to allow access to Lot No. 2 via an existing easement and a waiver of off-site improvements along Benson Road South. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Planning Department Recommendation: Approval of short plat and exception; denial of waiver. Hearing Examiner Decision: Approval of short plat and exception; Approval of waiver subject to posting a bond. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received on REPORT: April 24, 1980, and a secondary revised report was received on May 15, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 29, 1980 at 10:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building for the purpose of review of a requested rezone of the subject property and accompanying short plat request (File No. R-028-80) . Due to the necessity of publication of both waiver and exception requests to be heard concurrently with the short plat application, the matter was continued by the Examiner to May 20, 1980. CONTINUATION: The hearing was opened on May 20, 1980 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1: Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Short Plat as submitted Exhibit #3: Vicinity Map The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: George Xenos Professional Property Development 3000 N.E. 100th Seattle, WA 98125 Mr. Xenos indicated concurrence in the Planning Department recommendations contained in the staff report. Regarding the recommendation to deny the requested waiver, he expressed hope that the Board of Public Works would grant approval of a request for deferral of the required off-site improvements since improvement of Benson Road at this time would be premature because elevations and location of curbs, gutters and sidewalks have not yet been determined. The Examiner inquired if the applicant had entered into agreements with various owners of the right-of-ways including power line easements for development of access and parking in Lot 1. Mr. Xenos indicated that agreements had not been executed. Mr. Blaylock advised 411 t Sh. P1. 029-80 Page Two that the Bonneville Power Administration (B.P.A.) must review and approve all proposed development under the power lines. Mr. Xenos indicated that a request for use of the easement would be directed to the agency immediately. The Examiner inquired regarding the timing of improvement of Benson Road South, and whether improvement would occur within the maximum two year period allowed for deferral of off-site improvements. Mr. Blaylock noted that although the intersection of Puget Drive and Benson Road South would be completed within two years, it was unlikely that the portion of Benson fronting onto the property would be completed within that time frame. The Examiner suggested that approval of a waiver contingent upon execution of restrictive covenants to participate in a future LID may be more effective than approval of a deferral which would expire prior to the proposed improvement project. The Examiner requested further testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested final comments from the Planning Department representative. Since no further comments were offered, the hearing regarding File No. Short Plat 029-80, W-030-80 and E-043-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:20 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a two-lot short plat of +2.57 acres together with an exception for an easement access and a waiver of required off-site improvements. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, the subject proposal has been determined exempt from the threshold determination by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 7. The subject property was annexed into the city in two stages, the first in 1956 and the second in 1961. The Elks Lodge, on proposed Lot 2, was constructed in 1967. The site is the subject of a rezone petition which is currently pending before the City Council. In that action, the Hearing Examiner recommended that portions of the subject site be reclassified to B-1 (Business/Commercial) in order to unify the site under one zoning category. 8. The western portion of the subject site rises steeply above Benson Road and then levels off somewhat. The Elks Club is built on the eastern portion of the subject site. The applicant intends to construct a dental clinic on the western portion, proposed Lot 1. 9. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject property pursuant to Section 9-1105 which permits the short subdivision of less than five lots. 10. The creation of proposed Lot 2, separate and apart from the westerly portion, Lot 1, would leave Lot 2 without frontage on a public right-of-way; therefore, the applicant has requested an exception to Section 9-1102.8 which provides that a lot must front on a public street. The exception was requested pursuant to Section 9-1109. 11. The applicant has requested a waiver of the required off-site improvements along Benson Road because that road's design, alignment and elevation may be changed in the near future. The Planning Department indicated that fire related water improvements must be accomplished prior to construction of the clinic. 12. Currently the subject property is served by an access easement across the Bonneville power line corridor to the south. The easement serves the entire lot via Eagle Ridge Drive. The property has been served by the easement since construction of the Elks Lodge in 1967. The easement is a 30-foot wide right-of-way which has a 20 foot paved surface. Bonneville and other power line owners have provided easements across property which would otherwise be landlocked, and similar easements are found in other areas of the city. } (/ 411 41/, Sh. P1. 029-80 Page Three 13. The applicant proposes access to Lot 1 via a driveway entering from Benson Road. The drive would enter the southwest corner of the subject property where the terrain is less steep. • CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed short plat appears to serve the public use and interest. The subdivision is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and with the pending zoning classification of B-1. The creation of the second lot as a buildable parcel will permit the establishment of a proposed dental clinic in this growing area of the city. 2. Under the conditions imposed on the pending rezone, the site will be heavily landscaped to comply with the greenbelt designation of the powerline corridor. 3. The requested exception will permit the continued access of the Lodge, Lot 2, via the easement across the powerline corridor from Eagle Ridge Drive. The exception will not grant the applicant a new or special privilege; it will formalize the condition which has been an acceptable solution for access to this lot for the last 13 years. Similar access easements that cross powerline corridors exist in the city, and therefore the applicant is not the recipient of a special privilege. Granting the easement will permit the applicant to make reasonable use of the subject property by permitting the establishment of two lots on this +2.57 acre parcel. 4. The requested complete waiver of off-site improvements is not justified. The waiver would permanently free the applicant of the obligation to improve this very busy arterial. Both lots which will result from the short plat will add considerable traffic and the applicant should be responsible for providing improvements for the safe passage of both vehicles and pedestrians. At the same time, the future design and layout and elevations of Benson Road are under study and it would be a useless endeavor to install the required improvements only to have to remove them if the future road is in a different alignment. Therefore, a waiver of the requirement subject to the posting of a bond to cover the full costs of installing the required improvements is appropriate. In this way, the improvements can be installed after the realignment of Benson Road. 5. Those improvements required to provide adequate fire flow are required prior to the construction of any additional structures on the site. DECISION: Exhibit #2 is approved subject to City Council approval of Rezone File No. R-028-80. The exception to provide an easement access to Lot 2 is approved. The waiver is approved subject to the posting of a bond in an amount sufficient to cover the design and installation of the required improvements including but not limited to sidewalks, gutter, curbs and street lighting. Notwithstanding the waiver, the project must provide adequate fire flow and such improvements necessary to accomplish that purpose. ORDERED THIS 27th day of May, 1980. A\L-T9' Fred J. K fman Land Use Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of May, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the party of record: George Xenos, Professional Property Development, 3000 N.E. 100th, Seattle, WA 98125 TRANSMITTED THIS 27th day of May, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney T l 4111 n Sh. P1. 029-80 Page Four Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before June 10, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EX,\MIINIER PUBLIC HEARING MAY 20, 1980 APPLICANT : RENTON ELKS FILE NUMBER : Short Plat 029-80 , W-030-80, E-043-80 A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a 2-lot short plat on the subject site along with a request for an exception to the subdivision ordinance to allow access to Lot #2 by an established easement and a waiver of off-site improvements along Benson Road South. B . GENERAL INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : OFFICIALS OF THE RENTON ELKS , Hobe Allurine�, Thomas Carlin, Neil White 2 . Applicant : RENTON ELKS 3 . Location : (Vicinity Map Attached) West of the existing Renton Elks Club and east of Benson Road South 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Dept . 5 . Size of Property : ± 2 .57 acres 6 . Access : Via Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson Road South 7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1, General Classifi- cation District ; minimum lot size 35 , 000 square feet 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : GS-1 , R-4, B-1 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Medium Density Multiple Family 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing, date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on May 7 , 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by. City Ordinance on May 9 , 1980 . C . HISTOR Y/MlCRCtGII OUND: The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1871 of March 8, 1961 and Ordinance #1547 of. May 24, 1956 . The Elks Lodge was constructed in 1967. That PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY. REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , Short Plat 029-80 ,W-030-80 , E-043-80 MAY 20, 1980 PAGE TWO portion of the subject site not under the power lines was rezoned to B-1 by Ordinance #2059 on October 21, 1963 . A public hearing was held on the proposed rezoning of the subject site from GS-1 to R-3 on April 29 , 1980 . The Hearing Examiner recommended that the subject area involved with the rezoning application be rezoned to B-1 subject to limiting the parking development of the area under the power lines to a maximum of 50o along with the retention and addition of natural vegetation along Benson . The rezone application is now pending before the City Council . • D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography: The site rises fairly steeply from west to east , then levels off into a large plateau where the Elks Lodge is located. • 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravely sandy loam, 6-15% slopes (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Runoff is slow to moderate and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development . Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15-30o slopes (AgD) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is severe . This soil is used mostly for timber,. 3 . Vegetation : The natural vegetation is concentrated on proposed Lot #1 . 4. Wildlife: The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : No surface water was evidenced on the site (4-11-80) . 6. Land Use : The existing Elks Club is located on . proposed Lot #2 of the short plat . The remainder of the subject site is undeveloped . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are a mixture of undeveloped land, power transmission lines and rights-of-way, and some condominiums . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main runs east-west on Eagle Ridge Drive and a 10" main runs in a northwestrly- southeasterly direction in the easterly portion of the property . 8" sanitary sewers are located on Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson Road. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Dept. per ordinance requirements. 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #155 operates along Puget Drive South approximately z mile to the south of the subject site . 4. Schools : Spring Glen Elementary School and Fred Nelson Junior High School are both within . mile to the south of the subject site while Renton Senior High School is approximately la miles to the north. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , Short Plat 029-80 ,W-030-80, E-043-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE THREE 5. Recreation : Talbot Hill Park is approximately 1% miles to the southwest of the subject site . • G. APPLICAAE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: . 1 . Section 4-729 (C) , General Classification District . 2 . Section 4-711 , Business District . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OmICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , Pages 17-18, Objectives . 2 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105, Short Subdivisions . 3 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 . 6B, Waived Improvements . 4. Subdivision Ordinance 9-1109 , Exceptions. I . IMPACT ON. THE NATURAL OR HUNAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not directly impact the property. 2 . Population/Employment : Minor . 3. Schools: Not applicable . 4. Social : Not applicable . 5 . Traffic : No specific clinic plans have been submitted so the traffic impacts may be better addressed in a future Special Permit application. J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD OETE'tilINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton 's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , the short plat is exempt from an environmental determination . • K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division. 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . • 5. City of Renton Parks Department . L . - PLANNING OEPARINENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed short plat is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the present zoning designation for the subject site . The subject . site is zoned B-1 and GS-1 under, the power lines . If the Council concurs with the Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation , then the entire site would be rezoned to B-1 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , Short Plat 029-80 ,W-030-80 , E-043-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE FOUR 2. The applicant is requesting a two-lot short plat along with an exception to allow access to proposed lot #2 by an established easement . The easement was granted to the Renton Elks Lodge is unusual in that the 30 ' of right-of-way provided by the Department of Interior to the Renton Elks Lodge is in the form of a special agreement dated November 10, 1970. The access from Eagle Ridge Drive to the Lodge is completely contained within the property owned by the BPA. They have required that a 20 ' road be constructed on the 30 ' easement along with a provison that any modifications necessary because of power transmission line changes would be borne by the Elks Lodge . When the Lodge was constructed it was anticipated that they would access directly onto Benson Road South . However , the topographic. _ features along Benson Road South suggest some limitations to access . Access in such cases should be limited and encouraged to integrate into the circulation sys.tem ,at major points. This access provided by the BPA does provide a safer means for a large number of people accessing onto Benson Road via Eagle Ridge Drive . This area of Renton is typically cross cut with major power line right-of-ways . In most cases , the BPA or the electrical utility company does not want a public street unerneath their right-of-ways . They would prefer to grant easements or enter into special agreements with individuals to provide access across the properties . Therefore , the exception is necessary to insure that properties cut-off from normal access patterns are not deprived of their right to develop because of their specific location to power line right-of-ways . Granting of the exception does not appear to be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties in the vicinity. This has been proved , in fact , because of the past operation of the Lodge over the last ten years utilizing this access . 3 . The applicant has requested the waiver of improvements along Benson Road South . The applicant is probably basing their request upon the fact that Benson Road South is designated as a temporary state route and a major city arterial . However , the burden of improving the arterials should not be solely upon the city . The developing property owners along the right-of-way should be responsible for constructing normal improvements for a. two-lane road including the curbs and sidewalks . The City should not waive the requirement for improvements along Benson Road . Eventhough it is recognized that the design concept for this section of Benson Road South has not been completed and the elevations are unknown . , The applicant can bond for the property after obtaining a deferral of his portion of those improvements . That estimate would be made by the Public Works Department . Fire protection cannot be waived because it is a life/safety matter and any improvement to the water utility would have to be completed prior to the construction of any new buildings . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , Short Plat 029-80 ,W-030-80, E-043-80 MAY 20 , 1980 PAGE FIVE . M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the foreging analysis , it is recommended that the applicant ' s request for a short plat , File No . 029-80 and exception request , File E-043-80 be approved and that the request for a waiver W-030-80 be denied . • HA 1CHERO F SHORT PLAT IN THE WEST HALF OF SEC. 20, TWP, 23, RGE. SE., W.M. • RENTON, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON - [ICI[PATIOS. Bas/!d CLeaPan! /d fy sS •rw r ail rd ty Spate,nih,d d that we, IA¢u:ofrrstgnvd,visions! In/e<slwple A. y: ff6ll,Adl •llrw7l! of the •end!•train Ar;c rlhtd Co ntr r6y wale au Mrl sul dlvls Ion tnr.rdl pu.suant /e'•efe 'y' CONC6MN U../ f• oat l/.aeal s4r-IS to p(11`.R.17.000 end,'et,tart this snort plat hr(0,a replJr reC•Ptenlal Ion o1 and Ind!he d sntrl f to,00i on.IS neee with the 1•r:to,ant and in a[• --_�-- —--� cordanee with the des i•e of toe ordrit). ",7l/: In witness whereof we here tot our hands and seals. • 3 Nlyn'«•t 'au rr .: Sr n.--.. .r.c fume : nei•"'a il7id" - �,rlsnl7f I �.Y7I•dt'lJ% • ____ �i //!i 'J c.sf /yis& a�. -. •�tZ[Id C71W - tr'< Hare • s a` < /11'y - LQQ STAIF Of Y.t:ai'.GTO•t) - • s• 4 t 73S' CLC.TV Cr KING lot i. 1� A �! 7l��Cl rf 7 day of/,�'a�e 1900.$e/ore ne, a This Is is frr tlf that cn the /.. -- and a•y @ C, / Z ♦ilya• the w'ers lgreC,a apiary Putl it, Mrianelly appnarr0 -Rat 4.7 IL A._'tL=_74,,:.ore < f' the and- •, 2'�'• ``� �j•�` arts;et:irely. r'•_e- _ eJ,.....J c-ZP,f r__l•.va.le__ .::Bee re?1ve.rwT ,h. '•y •a;Kings en terrgnilon, to ee a own to nP ter+net�,duai TtT ono e.rFp7ee in.wi lhi • 1 t. •'•' ;?•s' eeclaratton and actnoni en ed 9 to k tMi they signed end seated the sere as these r.era•ryf- �,, + ••>•7 *1:: 7 •et1.•tary act anal Creel for the usel and purposes therein mentioned and oath �.- �^ t a!. t[key were eotnonted to e•erwte said Instrument n :" 3 -A- •ht�' taste that y r t erg the sad •111 Ned :;i i•..^ (If is the cot corporation. Y:TNISS my nand and offiClal 4 �i t -- -`.1�,T, ar.y) poratc seal of sale car - � _; <, j r, seal tte day and year first atone written. (ti • l71 'stint bum fc4:r• for'l,.p aee�-f:a:,-InyTn-n P. ,7PIT •+J• - 1-.�— r LP _ �•< iov'oy1 rrSldrr3q at assA v w,�cat-Terre 7r/-HN,1t Zt¢ ! ----------- - esc,w.a. r`s s, -- r.eS CVllfl(Ai[ ' 'j Xb ' This•art pint ,',recent,e a Prepared ty ne :ndr•ny dorms ionend.ill • ^D, YR ' c _r-a •nr ^a.i r1•rorn..1 r ,cr ,o r,a• S;•..I th,s fl.urtplat •qui rr-rots of 1e Slate, fountr r C r /• ) .war • ..rh t r r ai;u:pals ily,n �y�' -/ _.,.,tv or Ordinate 1p. yyJ.ad g_6Rr' ___..-- tr•ti ..;te No. _1EL-5a--- ______,---•A - .r I ' fil[0 iLn R(Cr ip ;,Af Of A.D. 19P,J,AT _0, t -- -It LL^r Or;C•RYTYS CY TAG[ - AT Tel Rt Cwi;}Of I . I r f/ '� ------- _ -_--Pi: THE CITY Of Pi'•10V.-- -- - ' . I t TR 0 __ 41 • 0gESH i -- -- uateP.tr•Dtnr - ------- cltenlfT1CY � -- thee vest half of Section 70, Township 23'earth, range S fast, -_:Ltr, lam., tins County.Vithington,described of follows: arc (•awl4(p AVO elfrsC':al 1Nl5 Dot Of A.D. 1!,60 C1�.enc;ng a t quarter a roar of said section; t .9"44'05"1 along --'-- ----'-------- . ur‘t 1 •n t of•disteoceoof 379.59 fret to the southerly narq,n al tl.e F.e....II..r ] •I r at inn:M foot Diablo- Si at l lewT•an,mi.t;on e,q`t- -——---- Led,; mlruvnt recorded under Au.+itnr•s file w 3,(O4••6, OIR(Ct CR!APT. Of PL'LIIC UOARS ard%of k irg'County,'washing ton;r thence n37.23.69"(along ta,d^sowl,.r•ly leca . margin 556.65 feet to•point noted•s the True Point of trginn,ng of Parcel IntD:wit:PIPOrCp inlS_- -_DAY Or—__ A D. Iy30 7S es deter.Ord ,n inslrwent re orrdrd:ndrr Auditor's f;lr No. 6150c14, re ores of R;nq County.wa s'ington• fai dc{w;nt alto Dr,nq the P01 N1 Oi af7l hhlr.G oft lot _-_ herein de•.crited tract; thence Y07•l6.11'Y I0,1.00 feet; thence 167.77'49'L 1RAff IC Ih;lu((R 617.77 reef to intersect the Iy margin of eenson.Koad•t a point on the of a the re^ter o/which Dean Y81.17'!J"[7B]5.00 Let ditty^r, thence [Kr.IDt0 tn0 tis POs[0 TnIS Dar Of •rumen lrca lens tale ra•trr IY^argon and along the arc of said cur re fo the -- A.D. 1550 left teoru.gn a c•^taI •hole of 7•!4'79"a^arc di slant,:01 974,81 feat to point of targ.nsc,ttr.rnce c••t,nwing along se,d strip l.land dis'$6"C • 337 53 fret to the northerlynra•gin n1 that I70 fool strip of land described • fl�n•.IrSG LIP(CtpN 'n foal ter ld,n'•-cl a,at, "of Owner shi0'r co•ded under Auditor's file Y (ft.11i;0.n:At PAOsf0 Tn IS 56077e0, r o•ds of n,ng County,v ingtnn;et hence Y74•!7'17"[afonq said ____LAY Lf _ _ _A 0. IgRO norinrr lr(.rq.n 040 60 fart tv•;,c^nt.n;en Fea.s S0:•!L'II"[ fro*the e..ut of I.q.nn,nq; ttnyfe An'3`,11,4••0 00 fret to tru PaltiT Cf WO/AMC. - -- RI•.'.:,:•air LSSI SS 04 , .. . , • , \ ,, ..- , .....„„,..,/../. ....., -, , . • c t ,f , 1 1 \ \ \ ( 1 / /I/ / / ../ I/ /' I • 1 I \ \ ..../ I \ I / ,_, . - / .. • , ' k 1 \ \ \-s--4-\-1--L-i 1 / , / / .... -,-...."-::-.., v i .. • /. , .• .. -/- / I 1 / / , .,- , — , ,, - - • • , - - ---- :"' 7—' 1 \ • • \ ' / IP. VT\ \ • \ 1 / / / ,/ il ; 1 / 1 // /// ,• 11 I ( i i / .•, / \ / I ,,,' I f f f /, // ' / ,/,„ , 1 , / , / '' 1.;.1; . I t` I 1/1 / / v..% • i / I / • I .4. ..'. ,r,. \, , • / .7k Pt- •.... ...-, N 1 , rig",.44,..... - -:,`-.4,”" 1,1.v.,, .-,..,t•".....4...00.41,..lern:...4...1.....-i.;.t--#.4.4 -4.,;-.2.111}41 ...741i... ......1- 1 / --—-- '' NZ \ , / / ... , ___/ / / z".. or or i / yt\''' /1 1-)0 )NR R f't , 4 C.',/ •°J \ :.,it. REZONE UNDER ' r I r CONSIDERATION ., / / / ( / i/ '\ "'''."'.'.\ \ t `. / i ,__, •ok t,.,,,, ‘ \ . /1 43 I 4/ a .II / ,/ , / 1116., / ,..... / t , ,,, , ,f:\,t,.• ‘ . ', 's 1 , • ... 4,„?..,..../..t. r,i, .,..„... ....tv,-,• ,...' ‘,; .,--t--• "‘ ,...1' .2.- •'' --.. -,,c:re,, • •,: N ) i' ', .' . ' • ,..-ti At,„ ,i 'Tr-1.4-4,,,,- •./..,,,Ls1,1”....,....,,. ,,, ,. ,v,......t ,,e, , ,e :7`., '.1 ! \ I I , / / ',P);',\ •' 'e. },, A \ . I . t. tl, Ill( \ / ,, // /i , i / / / • 1 •' 14,:.: v,, i 1) / / 1 I '.41 ' /' A.r7 // ' ..,i \ i , / ; / / . ,,.. / // e'...------..'. VU1U \ \\ \\ .. ,, V ' I i 1 / i I 7 / ('''.: • , „/ / I cs, / / // I . , / V V:. 5 ' . ‘ • / 1 1 r, I a / i• ''',i "••.1 . I / t P i / • / . 1..' ' Ai. — 4 1,.-A ;?,,,S \ \ , • , , . • , , , 1 $, , I , / , ,,, :,I , r 1 1 ) ' le. ' 4 ' 0 i \ 1 i i -- i /.......„..--- ,,, • , • ' '13..„1., • • Jiri. .., \ ‘ ., :4 .• • •-1 t) 1 r _ ,,— .., 1 , , . k ' ,111C:i •\ . / .,„11.:./-• , I i I ' ,/ ' , \\ I - 7 / I hi / ...-'"•-•-•--- A-7', ."•-• ' ,.....',1. , I 4 /' J J,•,. / / :' 1 !!, ( 7 •..„ I \ il AI rcg I 1 i \ 1 •% ' 1 \ 7:1 7: 1 ,,•••• l'.;/ . ----:•'------- I . '• ;!'i 1 IV 9..t., i !i 1 :i i I t 5, 1 I / / g f7;f,•: ,•••Vt-(;-t- 'iri , .1 i , \t \ \ \ I tr, / •-i •••,..., / / , • ,,, IA ..ty •-•I 6, . ‘ i I '.•E‘t 31'4 j \ i / r.' I / „:„.. • ,,,,, r , I 1 %,i AfTyi 7i it 1 1 , . 1 ,'4 / / 04,•14,„/t.''' / .'''•11 f 4 .')*' I 1 /i •ir ..../•Vt, / it / ' 1......./P' ,ii"404 •°' 1,t,„J.:, / ,,,i*') , .• ItN/ / 1 I . 1.•••-0'.i I i-:. I ./ 1 . ," ••.'4,....-4.016.°11""— ';. i'''' / ,' 1 • 1 l I ' 11111121.11P ,, .3. 1 1 Ai h ri.,41,Y / ,- / , . .."4.'"1 A'' ' a -.tt'.•11'/ '1,„)a• I ....... .--- ''... .....„, / - ••'', \' ...,,-0,3,.t.• t„,,,,„ „ 1 1 1 4‘. -,:.•,;. , , A., ,,,, ,„ foi.... 4" 4 / ".. r 1&:;-'4.1.- .......--.''''.' I i , ....''.1 1 1 I / C. 1 .•,41410.,, 4.,,,,,,V,.. I ' l '' I ( '.. I I i \_ _... I 1 it I 1 • .....i....L.-- 1 ., 1 _ t?••1,1, .„, , % j I 1 % I r',V„.,4 \ \ \ - , J •, , .....L.. ..........___-.• \ , .. \ . \........ 0 i, 1 ‘.' , i• ,i • :',, 1 / ..,t •,. , .t.z.tI ‘ ? ,, •, \ 1 I , ;4 'NV / I , ,_,,,,...,..,,,, . ‘, ,., , , \ , _ _...... '' 'IM:i.;:1?}4t1.1.::•-77:711'14:N.' , G''' '..,, . ' e/ ./..'t , ‘ \‘,.... ' • 1;.; .,01 1" i ' • \ \ v... '1- .... •' ' ' I. I / \ '''41" .1.?31..;'.1.• ,'- ' V. ''• '/. 1.,, .q•-•N •.15... , 1 ••, .\° , ' '. 1 P."<- . •1 1 i 4-20..1, \ i•' i i 1 I i. i ' ) • r) 1 t‘: g I• ' .\,' 4:, ' 7 ,'' . 0 '' .1 1 1:‘' . i ...,‘") N.A• , 1 -05 t 1. , / A. .%••• •••)?••\,,t.` • t 1.4: ° A / / • ,..—--_. ...... . I . i C', ‘ 1 .. 1 / •0. 4\'‘. /\• / / i •13' ,b, / / „- ' , -, r't ' I , \:,; ,Iv i . I' A..., i • ; c> . ) 0/> / '' , ,r/ , • • ,p , 1 '1/4,, -•,. ILI 1 I I •••'.-.- , I. . ..1 .. .) l i r•1' %•,,C) ,•, 1. • / # e , rn cn ‘• ; , / n'?f,E ,.."- NI' \ ‘ ,' , : ,i 6,1 ' \s, r , /„‘ , ,. i 1' 1 c2 ...1,• . ."' "‘-•c, Ill<0 / .-3 0 \ 10 \ / / 4. / / / e.. \ ' .,/ , ,e, . ,i, / . ,,,:s, .. ., , .....„ - 0 -ci N.'. ' ',/ / / I I i •., r 1 rn--g. // 1 .....' I !1 /1 /V ! k•. ,4 o o o • Lei 0 0 --A ,.. . 7. ° ' 1 I ‘ \ CC% ° /01 ‘ \ s s, 1 1 ' \ ? 1 , ‘ , I, \ I , ,/ cc,ce.co 0 0 o \ \ \\ " , i , , I 1\ I , t/ ( ,// / S cA) \ , ., 1 , I 0 o '1 ,-* 1 I / c)z ri \ ---, I \I \\\\ \ • OA \ ‘‘, \ • \ J t ‘ • \ li ) • o 5 . • 91P/ 6 Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 04 10: Efe. Application : . * CS 01 i r ®s ?:tict '1 ,i, i :.',/,,,- 0 '0.-"r i '' f/;* vz- 4. T -,% Location : gx) es. . 0 � e Aglicee age UAW Applicant : '. : ® ;1 4- 0 ,x h , TO: Parks Department , SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ' T ,' Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : ' ; V Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other ) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI G FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF i'D ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO AITEND THE ARC, PLE SE RR VIDE THE. COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved A: Approved with Conditionsr Not Approved r t�et/z _t ~i�Q_ai e� Cer. v�`" J -7.--4„ , ,-)- ' c., -,-6-.,„ ,',„_ ,....A ,.,„,a,-,...,-- ,,._;--/ 14._ 0-e.,1_,_e_t-4--4?". f I Signature of Director or Authorized 'R4 r7/A/6c° epresentative J . Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : ;. 0 _4 - /' Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ,-- - ; ;` ; I 1. • /(1 ( , Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 9/ 1010 'Planning 12-1979 �� DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET, RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,'„ ' �� •t� gel Appli cation : *i n k4,4 s. S .. „.' �i' ' ' 'oirf �' dM ir atit607.,,ig,19.) ( 'IA,- 04' ,el' , ® k Location : � 6 4 ��p '®� �') f ceA , •Q/_ j Ago Applicant: TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : / - ' ^ ,6 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : e Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering • . 'Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRIT GG FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 :UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF244 D ARTMENT DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ ATTEND THE. ARC, PLEASE P VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : _-.I -,r- '`;; _ /�- '1�-,-� J/ - .)- 7 Approved ,i Approved with Conditions Not Approved _ii":. = / ' --,',%:i)/.;51 C— A: 7l //?-4' : 1'_1/1 (")•_( /V ' al7l/)i-(, /] /f:%ice C.,:% F IVY: ) C),/ .5 1 /'/` ``( /. " - jv)// /� C C/.,f C'(` - 7-r__' C , /(_, A:- {( / /\ /.-I% '_ / //i X /. /j /-/v/ J/-//',' /0:4- (i/(--, :0Y ,e ,.�,7- ,, ti. /G' / _),/-:, _)' i,J /;``- / ;',f_ > J /J/ ( l /J,':'I_1`/L%A 4- S ,/1,,/.-)-7 - //C) -f : - ' /j,. /- 1--- % / , (./r)/-/" / Ci LI / / J%i f Signature of Director 'or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : iii;Ljiv' f)e.'7 Appro"ed " Approved with Conditions Not Approved • O t/ 5,.. Fr i.,ry.c,2_ 5rs ix' ' C.,mg.cc: c;,1 /5 LI i"1. srwL;2 , 7 .9 iY fi:u7 `�-r,,' -co'(�', 15 Nc:26�%""J�rvi Cis CnLs ;J Qp ��ni�2 ^IAi/�! / 1 r LI } P id _ ,),/ 00,4,_ __ 4 // denature of Director or Authorized Representative Date y a. /91/44 P1 Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT .0,09 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SNEE `" 0%"br' )f11 Application .i!F` a 61 ' )� (5. d. to \c OIpplei-• , ,f•" w �; 'fir "" Location : CP 3,R100 �awliN116. . .�.�� Applicant : { ?p- e/4 C64 TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE : Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BEHELD ON. AT 9 :00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF '`OURritor ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PA VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON —iN— • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7.61Apit,,Ic 3 o•�t �06" � Dsv. Approved A' Approved with Conditions Not Approved 705 Ai(t IA . iu A roca Ord ogv ez RtF7 c tel41964 aai°r 4'✓,,.. L tc C,) p m Li r 4e, 0 riff,.. 5 ITT soi eft()v e 14 e % 1 C. z1-1 -0 q r 7 f ( '•14, If"- 80 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : q,,, ,c-Zv a_c_f_sP1— //r. Approved — Approved with Conditions Not Approved g3c) Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date . i 411 May 9, 1980 (ofJ R V o571�c , J\1Et ( ICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMI1 ER CITY OF RENTON n REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL, APPLICANT: ^f ,+ 'Renton Elks Club 1. FILE NO. R-028-80, N�NG DEP�% Je4d .r P1. 029-80, �oo� W-030-• LOCATION: West of the existing Renton Elks Club and east of Benson Road S. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from GS-1 to R-3 and a two-lot short plat on the subject site to allow for construction of a dental clinic on the newly created lot. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with restrictive covenants. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval to B-1 with restrictive covenants. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on April 24, 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on April 29, 1980 at 10:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Steve Munson, Planning Department, reviewed the report and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1: Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map Exhibit #3: Short Plat as submitted Exhibit #4: Area Map Indicating Streets The Examiner requested the location of existing B-1 zoning which lies south of the subject site. Mr. Munson designated the B-1 zoned areas located outside the power line right-of-way. The Examiner inquired if three power line right-of-ways cross the property. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, indicated that two easements exist on the subject property with another located on the southerly boundary. Mr. Blaylock also corrected an error in Section I.5 of the staff report which states that traffic impacts may be better addressed in a future special permit application, and advised that a special permit will not be required for the auxiliary parking lot located on property zoned R-3, and design review can occur by the Planning Department at the building permit application stage. The Examiner inquired regarding proposed access to Lot 1. Mr. Blaylock indicated that in the original proposal in 1967, a roadway was anticipated from Benson Road South into the Elks Club facility; however, access was later provided via Eagle Ridge Drive. Regarding the feasibility of providing access directly to Benson Road, Mr. Blaylock indicated that although the topography is quite steep, access would be physically possible. He also noted that emergency fire access is possible from Lot 2. The Examiner stated that the public hearing agenda does not reflect application for a waiver, although the Planning Department report denotes the request. Following review, Mr. Blaylock advised that the public hearing publication notice does not contain the waiver request, and it will subsequently be added to the legal publication for the short plat and exception requests to be continued to May 20, 1980. The Examiner inquired if the Planning Department had considered the B-1 zoning designation for the entire site in lieu of R-3 and thereby eliminate the necessity for a special permit to allow for parking facilities. Mr. Blaylock referenced Section 4-2204.C.2 of the Parking and Loading Ordinance which states that plans for any parking area, when not located on the same lot with the principal use, shall be approved by the Hearing Examiner as a special use, R-W 80 Page Two but because auxiliary parking is located on the same lot as the medical clinic, plans may be approved by the Planning Department. The Examiner stated that the R-3 zone does not permit a dental clinic or auxiliary parking without a special permit, but the B-1 zoning category would permit the proposal outright as well as provide consistency with the land use for the existing Elks Club facility. Mr. Blaylock indicated that although the B-1 zone had not been proposed, it could be considered if limitation of maximum coverage continues in compliance with the general intent of greenbelt requirements. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: George Xenos Property Development Assoc. 3000 N.E. 100th Seattle, WA 98125 Mr. Xenos, representing the property owner and Mr. Hancheroff - potential occupant of the clinic, submitted the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #5: Colored Diagram of Conceptual Development Plan Exhibit #6: Letter to Mr. Xenos from C. Kelly O'Neil, Real Estate Broker, dated April 29, 1980 The letter encouraged approval of the subject request to fulfill a community need for suitable medical clinic property in the downtown area of the City of Renton. Mr. Xenos indicated that the property is difficult to develop due to the topography, and construction of the clinic will occur on the B-1 portion with auxiliary parking on the existing GS-1 portion. He noted that from 20 to 30 percent of the existing GS-1 parcel will be utilized for parking, and the proposed landscaping is compatible with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Xenos inquired if the subject of improvements could be addressed at this time. The Examiner explained that the short plat, with accompanying exception and waiver requests , will be continued for hearing on May 20, 1980 following publication of appropriate legal notice. Mr. Xenos felt that a request for exception is unnecessary because Parcel 2 will remain unchanged and access to Parcel 1 will be provided from a dedicated roadway. Mr. Blaylock clarified the Subdivision Ordinance requirement for frontage on a public right- of-way for all lots, and while the lot containing the Renton Elks Club facility contains frontage on the Benson Road, access is not obtained from that roadway. He noted that without the exception request for easement, the lot will remain landlocked. The Examiner inquired regarding the square footage proposed for the clinic in order to determine the number of required parking spaces and aid in determining the appropriate zoning category for the site. Mr. Blaylock advised that the plan reflects 14,300 square feet in the proposal. Mr. Xenos indicated that due to topography on the site it is difficult to achieve parking requirements without destroying aesthetic qualities of the property located between the roadway and future development. Mr. Blaylock concurred in Mr. Xenos' comments regarding severe limitation of development due to topography, and noted that auxiliary parking is allowed in the R-3 zone, the minimum zoning category necessary to allow parking. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was no response. He then requested general testimony. Responding was: Lori Johnsen P.O. Box 161 Renton, WA 98055 Ms. Johnsen requested that a copy of the Examiner's report be transmitted to her upon publication. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. R-028-80 was closed by the Examiner at 11:05 a.m. , and the requests for short plat, exception and waiver were continued to May 20, 1980 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. R-0zu-80 Page Three FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a reclassification of +2.57 acres of property from GS-1 (General; Single Family Residential; Minimum lot size - 35,000 square feet) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) . 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, R.C.W. 43.21.C. , as amended, a Declaration. of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental Review Committee, responsible official. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The subject property was annexed into the city in two phases--the first in 1956 and then in 1961. The GS-1 zoning was applied at the time of annexation. 8. The subject property actually consists of two separate parcels, each is located under a powerline right-of-way. One parcel is located at the •northwest corner of the Elks Club.. The other parcel is located at the southwest corner of the Elks Club. Both parcels are part of a larger tract owned by the Elks Club but consisting of mixed zoning categories. 9. The site has a steep slope which rises from west to east above Benson Road South. The sites are covered with natural vegetation. 10. The Elks Club facility is located east of the two parcels and a proposed short plat would separate the Elks Club proper from the western portion of the property. This western portion would be developed with a dental clinic and the two parcels proposed for reclassification would serve as parking for the clinic. 11. Property located under the pdwerlines has in most cases been zoned GS-1 and is designated for greenbelt by the Comprehensive Plan. Under terms of the easements creating the powerline corridors, no structures can be built under the lines. 12. The Elks Club property with the exception of the powerline easements is currently . zoned B-1 (Commercial) . The proposed subdivision of the Elks Club B-1 property into two lots would enable the establishment of a dental clinic on the undeveloped portion as a permitted use (subject to a threshold environmental determination) . The applicant has to provide an area in which to establish parking as the western portion, currently zoned B-1, does not have sufficient area in which to provide parking. • 13. Therefore, the applicant has proposed rezoning the powerline parcels to R-3 in order to provide a zoning category which would permit the establishment of parking lots under the powerline corridor. The GS-1 zoning only permits the establishment of single family residences. 14. As proposed by the applicant, the R-3 zoning would permit the development of accessory parking lots for the dental clinic subject to the approval of a special permit. 15. The zoning in the area is a mixture of B-1, the main portion of the Elks Club property and property located west of Benson across from the proposed parcels, R-4 (High Density Multifamily) east and southeast of the Elks Club; and the GS-1, the powerline corridors. 16. The Planning Department recommended that no more than 49% of the subject site be used for accessory parking and that the area be maintained with natural landscaping so that the proposal would remain consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's designation of the subject property for open space greenbelt. 17. B-1 zoning on the subject site would also permit the dental clinic's accessory parking lot. R-028-80 Page Four CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proponent of a rezone must demonstrate that the request is in the public interest and will not impair the public health, safety and welfare in addition to compliance with at least one of the three criteria listed in Section 4-3010 which provides in part that: a. The subject site has not been considered in a previous area-wide rezone or land use analysis; or b. The subject site is potentially designated for the new classification per the Comprehensive Plan; or c. There has been material and substantial change in circumstances in the area in which the subject site is located since the last rezoning of the property or area. The applicant has demonstrated that the current classification of the property warrants change. 2. The powerline right-of-ways are limited in potential. Structures may not be built beneath the power lines. The GS-1 zoning which restricts the use of the property to single family residential is unrealistic. The proposed use of the land under the power lines for accessory parking for a dential clinic would permit the applicant to make reasonable use of his property. Parking is permitted under the power lines. 3. The proposed rezone of the land to R-3, however, would not permit the outright use of the land below the power lines for a dental clinic's accessory parking without a further hearing on a special permit. It would also create two rather small areas of R-3 zoning in the midst of B-1 zones. More practical and consistent with the surrounding zoning and the zoning of the remainder of the lot would be a reclassification of the subject property to B-1. It would be consistent with the adjoining property and would permit the needed parking without a need for special permit approval. 4. Under either zoning category, B-1 or R-3, the parking use would have to be limited to a small area to remain faithful to the Comprehensive Plan designation of the subject site for greenbelt. As recommended by the Planning Department, scattered parking which is contained in a well-landscaped parking area will permit development of this parcel consistent with the goals and objective of the Comprehensive Plan and its designation of the subject site as suitable for greenbelt. 5. The parking lot and roadways under the power line should be limited to less than 50% with the remaining portions of the site landscaped to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The execution of restrictive covenants to assure compliance with the open space/greenbelt designation of the subject property should be required as a condition of the rezoning of the subject property. The covenants should restrict use of the subject property to parking, and the parking should be restricted to less than 50% of the area of the subject site. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should approve the reclassification of the subject property from GS-1 to B-1 subject to the execution of restrictive covenants which: 1. Limit the development to a parking lot on the subject property. 2. Limit to less than 50% of the site area for the parking lot pavement and roadways. 3. Require the installation or retention of natural landscaping on the subject site in the areas not developed for parking or roads. ORDERED THIS 9th day of May, 1980. A-3 GIAA Fred J. Ka V an Land Use Hearing Exa iner ^max R-028-80 Page Five TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of May, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: George Xenos, Property Development Assoc. , 3000 N.E. 100th, Seattle, WA 98125 Lori Johnsen, P.O. Box 161, Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 9th day of May, 1980 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Hanis, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, 'request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before May 23, 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based_ on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. .-.. 1''';';`'rr-es' '- . • rE:rt6-1.410 i ' . - -'A/ie.:Elia .. •I - \s,-'•-•.-' tr-4- -:r.,,,,' • API I i' , '„�, . .��rl'• ma , i , ., -.' Cr; ._ '.,', --ff girP, H...1 . . , • , ,- . - „ , , ,\,...1---L--- . - ;.si. 4 444. 1 ,.. ;.I. '4 I: ' • .• e ;a 9 ii .4-I:- 114 . -: -:•-• . g, % s ,., 1,-..-..,, _ -. 1 : - I A 5 ,,It s/ . = _ , _ 17z.• i II ., . .' . •. . . ♦ • f - I % , G01 ,p,.•-._ . _ gr A .t-1 �• - ♦ 4' Zt 19 1141 ._. •1Q,! if. . I // I ,� ` . j , , i II . L—I , .00" ••.' ..,.....-' 4,-4 AlAt_ • - - it' . 4 5 it il CI 14 41 .,' . G Siji . . . ' • e...,mio..., r . ,/. . . . _,__i___-,-i- ---. .-t. .. . H R. , -. - ...----. ......i , , • , ., , , . .- ,--. ..., 1 . .. 4, .• Li, 9.-'' " 4i . \ .7 /400..--- % .• - - .. . -., .\ 44 . •14 l ..i •Is to .n ' ,i• ... . . -' I 1 L . li 1 i I ' I / --.,„ _. . .._, 1 1 .,..„.,...- . , -.„___.___,..____.,. ._____,--.---7 7.-7„-:,..--- NN •• '• . •i ' 1 .6 1 .4, r- ,:4,k, :-- • ..- Ili 4.; •. `• 1 •%.??-•;:-....i. - 0 - a° . • - --#-..3-#.- .'....' --,r i i t.. .--,. .44 pijk rrilior:, ,-;.. i,„4 „,.... . - .--.--- ,--. , '>$/ f 0:,-,.. .-. ! vi ..„....4,. -, 4.,,,pri .. •r3- I 1 f“. ::::-.2' - A'40k104;*$J iA . 1 . . " •-- ;11,Ftl. 1-.7 4'.' . . -lei I. i . ... .„:,_R ___._ , ,. 1,.„.n_, ....,, MI - ) — ‘ 4,1 1.2 ; .„.. .4 tlibl. '' ' . T.: ; in.:4.:i p.\'.-•:i..1:..A.-_4,.l N N ♦ • ,J ti, 'N� emo•A • , Rirl....._• . V.., ,4i;g99129_i1:1117101„ri,i i4i.5:020 1)4,,m MD.' mii ''' \\:„s • ‘`. N 4 . c * . • • ,,,,,,•,,, , ... ; i!;'''' .. ,. .:. 1 -, .row- . _ ,,, „ . . . r .,.,.• . : 1 r _, . ..__._ , ....1 .7 .- , N‘ 11' R-2 a ... fe'-' l'-,1 a • �1 J th 94 IA «E OT • \ :, •` I. y s ;&11!4 - 14 .. . .. , .. A ,././.__ _ .....- ._ _,5,___ R .30 ‘ _-_ff-_ .- E- • ,i - , iffe...- RiEs' 1.. .4446,.e .- -4, .- -e .-. - 0- , '• IP 1111111..- - - „ .. i it. -1 • 1 "' _ ,0-12- i 11 ',, - . ', S . • a. • . -‘.____ . - ,i(i + .fir ". 0- • 3. • G S+' -y • • ' r (..' (; ''' .. 00 , 1 ,t, . . .i.. 1 s . •1 APPLICANT RENTON ELKS TOTAL AREA +2. 57 acres • PRINCIPAL ACCESS VIA EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE EXISTING ZONING GS-1 , General Classification District ' EXISTING USE Existing Elks Club located on proposed Lot #2; ' the remainder undeveloped. PROPOSED USE , Clinic • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family ; Green- belt I COMMENTS P12-1979lanning IIP RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application . I,., ;di • . ,% Q :O �� 44. 14,60 catty.'s Location : Reipi Chat" �r 1e (Wc;1e1)?JetalkAdIr I Applicant: sgett4Drk elks TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : S/)a ' 6 Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE 'fp AITEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : eh'ejc. Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 11 —go ignature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative - Date � Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : C' :1 , . I `O i t+ Location : iliebvto60 Ell Clue site (We 'Ie1)PJ Eye Ateir-A: App1 i cant.: 04,440" elcs TO: Parks Department 0 SCHEDULED NEARING DATE : 5/). 1Q Police Department A. R. C. MEETING DATE : Public orks Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9 : 00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved (/ ;44- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ate REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Planning RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : EXCGAMON E.se49V34e 10 £ jr 4 ,„ e'ep Location : �. � itrt �..: • :�_ :w Iay • e. 1,'.ti Applicant : :Jr.. Piebrk elk s TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED NEARING DATE : Sb4 ® Police Department A, R,C. MEETING DATE : Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering - / Building Division e_ Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : uT«IT1 - vi Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1/y/ l a-- sl��v Signature of Di ector or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : . Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 5---/C - Oro Signature of rector or Authorized Representative Date illo Planning 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION) REVIEW SHEET Application : ;,. 1L ;,. .` P t • ) TO et MD gn eir,OM _SP. (145, Location : Re4igebbsecam Ea, c/g b sole (We,'I,p1 , ô / j4t/, I),j Applicant: Rer,,„,411)sok el4cg TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Sith1/610 Police Department A, R, C, MEETING DATE : Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:00 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : T4A1FF &nom60CWto a1. If Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved vw►/J CFI S--/6 - 80 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Planning ' 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • Application . 1 % _:` e.: / °• r0; 1;4p , . Location : ilicallehon, ' C its 12S 'i SpIe. ( mod 1 ce �vgi�r�''��". r Applicant: Ajosot el46s TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Sit - 1214- Police Department A, R,C, MEETING DATE : Public Works Department Engineering Division' Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON AT 9:U0 A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, IF YOUR DEPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ A TEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : gC7D _X Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved • I 7_/,o GgloWt) / ?-g Signatu751 Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date CITY OF RENTON V / PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAME �:OPpe c",7c)a DATE r-'//-s';6'r: PROJECT & LOCATION /) ?'On ,1 /f`; Application Type Basic Fee Acreage Fee Total Environmental Checklist Environmental Checklist Construction Valuation Fee TOTAL FEES `,/f.,O Please take this receipt and your payment to the Finance Department on the first floor. Thank you. PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOC . LAND CONSULTANTS GEORGE J. XENOS (206) 523-3932 3000 N.E. 100 th Seattle, Washington 98125 - D5/3- FO Mr. Roger J. Blaylock City of Renton Planning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Exception of the Subdivision Ordinance Dear Mr. Blaylock : On behalf of the Renton Elks Club, we wish to request for an exception of the Subdivision Ordinance on the Short Plat which we have submitted to you for approval. The Elks facility has been utilizing an easement across the P.S.P . & L. right-of-way since the opening of their club. They have no plans of altering thier existing access off from South Eagle Ridge Dr. Sinc rely, Ge Ce v a��NEo MAY 13 1980 ` N_G�Ep�t '� .. " • < `� United States Department of the Interior \ .. a;E'�. ,'. 0'I BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION 1? v; b1 �' SEATTLE AREA OFFICE .tea _ \y ,`x, �/ ;yR-0Hs: 415 First Avenue North, Room 250 yyyy��4q Seattle, Washington 98109 Nov• ember IN REPLY REFER TO: O'OL November 13, l7 r 07 0 • Renton Elks Lodge 1809 2301g Main Avenue P. O. D x 354 Renton, Wash:;ngton 98055 Gentlemen: Enclosed are the original and two copies of the permit which you requested for use of the easement area on our Covington Duwamish line right of way • for access to your prol:Jr ty. Please note the last paragraph on page one of the attached permit stating conditions that must be complied with. Please sign and return the original and one copy to this office. Me second copy is for you to retain for your records. I Sincerel Q Robert M. Holland . j Supervisor, Operations and Maintenance �J • tx /' �� • wry; oF�. F;. 410 • UNITED STATE • S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR \�=s; `'• BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION 4R.cy's, PORTLAND, OREGON 97208 Date: November 10, /970 Renton 'Elks Lodge 130 • 23dg Main Avenue Tract No.C-: m655 P.A. Boy: 351 Renton, Washington 93055 Line Covington Duwa ish Gentlemen: Contract Ni0hhI-03'.1965°. • • Subject: Use of Bonneville Power Administration easement area for t.,.eueSS: to property owned by Renton Elks Lcdges 1009 in Suction 20, Lwp... 113 N., I?_t?:gc 5 •Ct:asty 14J4a , Ring County:, Was71inrFton, said access t0 he prtvatr� road on 30 coot wide strip along1� nortthea6t edge, -r A ." r �f y long t' C 5 �s v+-0uitiami.;h. t•r^.?'1_3- ��i?.� C�1. right-of-way, i3f',pCp:Cl.�,..ttf,-'�-,� l�.J 'r:f:;'u .�.Oi)�, on the ,,pl'::I7�:, 0.., miaeiort lino, oottii-:,en Str::ot?irel: 43 and EL.:corst:':!.Cted 2.i.o C vicigton- attle t,rans- raission line, structures 43 and 1,1), as designated in rod on BM Nap No. 195i;j9•-. 811-D, and the two drawings salutatted. by said Elks Club, on file with the Branch . • of Land, The above described use of this easement tract has been determined not to be a hazard to nor an interference with the Bonne ille power Administration's present of this easeme li frr electlic transmission line purposes. Accordingly, there is no objection to such use, subject to the condi- tion, however, that if such use should at any time become a hazard to the presently installed electrical facilities of the Administration, or any facilities added or constructed in the future, or should such use interfere with the inspection, maintenance or Tepair of the same, or with the access along such easement, you will be required to remove such hazard or interference. You, of course, will have to assume all risk of loss, damage or injury which may result from your use of the easement area, except for such loss, damage or injury as the United States may be responsible for under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 62 Stat. 982, as amended. It is understood that any damage to tc� Government's property caused by or resulting from your • use of the easement tract may be repaired by the Administration and the actual cost of such repair shall be charged against and be paid by you. • The following conditions.also must be complied with: 4 Said road shall not interfere with this Administration's redesign, relocation, rebuilding, operation or maintenance of cdeting or future power linos on its right of my. Said x'o d shall be 20 feet wide plus necessary storm drninege,andthou/der ruir:✓rnts. • • • • • • BPA 419 Feb. 1 965 4111 • • • It is understood that any rights granted you hereunder are subject to existing rights, if any, of other parties. It is further understood that you covenant and agree that you will comply with the terms and provisions of Title VI of the Civil Bights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 241, to the extent that the • provisions of said Act apply to you. In the event of violation, the United States of America reserves the right to invoke the provisions of Section 17.7 of Title 43 C.F.H. • This agreement will become effective upon your returning this letter with your approving signature to the Bonneville Power Administration, P. 0. Box 3621, Portland, Oregon, 97208. The copy is for you to retain as your record. Sincerely yours, Maxc.. .--7/,/,; , /k. ewe__ L. McMillin Head, Title Section • Branch of Land • The above agreement is accepted and its terms agreed to on this `Co day of Cre./M+ , 19 /0. • • BPA 41N 2 Rev. June t 970 • hr fl-1O-70 ' INTINIOR--bONNC':LLC GJREN ADMINISTRATION.PORTL.NO.UNCCON 9 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON MAY 20, 1980 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. RENTON ELKS CLUB, APPLICATIONS FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, File W-030-80, AND EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO ALLOW ACCESS BY EASEMENT , File E-043-80 ; property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Road. 2. BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN M-P ZONE , File SP-011-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Ave . S.W. , 550 feet north of S.W. 34th St. 3. BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT 72 , 370 SQ. FT . WAREHOUSE/ OFFICE FACILITY IN M-P ZONE , File SA-012-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Ave. S.W. , 550 feet north of S.W. 34th St. 4. MAY CREEK ASSOCIATES , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM G-9600 TO R-2 FOR PURPOSE OF FUTURE CONSTRUCTION OF 26 TOWNHOUSE DUPLEXES , File R-037-80 ; property located in the vicinity of 4904 Lake Washington Blvd. N.E. (Tract 181) , adjacent to and north of S.E. 76th St. Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE. PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 20, 1980, AT 9 :00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : May 7, 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , ROGER BLAYLOCK , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the 2nd day of May. �• SIGNED : 11. ►,. ` • OF I O THE CITY OF RENTON a► t° V �� 4 �a. {' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 seL •. BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9,� �• 235- 2550 0,9g7 SEPt��� May 2 , 1980 The Renton Elks c/o George J . Xenos Professional Property Development 3000 N.E . 100th Seattle , Washington 98125 Re : APPLICATIONS FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS , File W-030-80 , AND EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO ALLOW ACCESS BY EASEMENT, File E-043-80 ; property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Road Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned applications on April 3 and 25, 1980 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for May 20 , 1980 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present.. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . • Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By: 1N"' 4-7e; kA4, Roger Blayl Associate Planner RJB:wr cc : Triad Associates 1950 112th Ave . N.E. Bellevue, WA 98004 Renton Elks Club 1600 Eagle Ridge Drive Renton, WA 98055 i . _ PLANNING DEPA"�TfIEIIT PRELIIMII '\Y ',EPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER $6 PUBLIC HEARING ',0 , 0 APRIL 29 , 1980 APPLICANT : RENTON ELKS FILE NUMBER : Rt-028-80 , Short Plat 029-80, W-030-80 A. - SUMMARY( & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a rezone from GS-1 to R-3 and a 2-lot short plat on the subject site. A clinic is proposed for the future use of the newly created lot . B . GENERAL INN ATION: 1 . Owner of Record : HOBE ALLURINE, THOMAS CARLIN, NEIL WHITE 2 . Applicant : RENTON ELKS 3 . Location : (Vicinity Map Attached) West of the existing Renton Elks Club and east of Benson ' Road South 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5 . Size of Property : *2 . 57 acres . 6. Access : Via Eagle Ridge Drive 7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1, General Classifi- . cation District ; minimum lot size 35 ,000 square feet 8. Existing Zoning in the Area: GS-1 , R-4 , 6-I 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Medium Density Multiple Family, Greenbelt 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on April 16, 1980 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on April 11 , 1980. C . STOR '®:AGKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinances #1871 of March 8, 1961 and Ordinance #1547 of May 24, 1956 . The Elks Lodge was constructed in 1967. That portion of the subject site not under the power lines was rezoned to B-1 by Ordinance #2059 on October 21 , 1963 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , R-028-80 , Short Plat 029-80 , W-030-80 APRIL 29 , 1980 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The site rises fairly steeply from west to east, then levels off into a large plateau where the Elks Lodge is located . 2 . Soils : Alderwood gravely sandy loam, 6-15% slopes (AgC) . Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum . Runoff is slow to moderate and the erosion hazard is moderate . This soil is used for timber, pasture , berries , row crops and for urban development . Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15-30% slopes (AgD) . Runoff is medium and the erosion hazard is severe . This soil is used mostly for timber . 3 . Vegetation : The natural vegetation is concentrated on proposed Lot #1 . 4 . Wildlife: The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : No surface water was evidenced on the site (4-11-80) . 6. Land Use : The existing Elks Club is located on proposed Lot #2 of the short plat . The remainder of the subject site is undeveloped . E . NfEIGHI1ORHID®D CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are a mixture of undeveloped land, power transmission lines and rights-of-way, and some condominiums. F . IPW ILIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An 8" water main runs east-west on Eagle Ridge Drive and a 10" main runs in a northwestrly- southeasterly direction in the easterly portion of the property. 8" sanitary sewers are located on Eagle Ridge Drive and Benson Road . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Dept . per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #155 operates along Puget Drive South approximately z mile to the south of the subject site . 4. Schools : Spring Glen Elementary School and Fred Nelson Junior High School are both within z mile to the south of the subject site while Renton Senior High School is approximately lz miles to the north. 5 . Recreation : Talbot Hill Park is approximately 11/4 miles to the southwest of the subject site . G. APPLICATLE SECTIONS OF THE Z®NIIWIG CODE: 1 . Section 4-729 (C) , General Classification District . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHEROFFICIALCITYDOCUMENT: 1 . Land Use Report , 1965 , pages 17-18, Objectives . 2 . Subdivision Ordinance, Section 9-1105 , Short Subdivisions . 3. Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1105 .6B, Waiv,. . I PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER `PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , R-028-80, Short Plat 039-80,W-030-80 APRIL 29, 1980 PAGE FOUR Loading Ordinance requires that any parking lots over 10,000 square feet have a minimum of 5% of the parking area in landscaping . With the primary intent of the Comprehensive Plan to use the area as greenbelt , it would appear that the parking would have to be auxiliary to the greenbelt designation . If only half of the total area was utilized for parking and the. other half was extensively landscaped , it would create the appearance of meeting the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 2 . The majority of the subject site was rezoned to B-1 by Ordinance 2059 on October 21 , 1963. The Elks Lodge was subsequently built in 1967 . Those portions of the site under the high power transmission lines were left in a GS-1 classification and not rezoned to B-1 . The subject site , under the power lines , has not been considered for a rezone since the property was annexed into the City in 1956 (Section 4-3014-A) . A dental clinic could be constructed on that portion of the site presently zoned B-l .as an allowed use . Auxiliary parking could be allowed on those portions of the site under the transmission lines if the property was rezoned to R-3. Normally auxiliary parking lots are on separate , adjacent parcels . The one parcel , proposed Lot #1 , would contain two zoning classifications and would not follow under the procedures of Section 4-2204(3) (C ) (2) as in the recent case of the Boeing Parking Lot #11 . Therefore the design review would take place at the building permit application stage by the Planning Department . 3 . On November 8, 1971 a portion of the power line right-of-way designated as greenbelt in the Comprehensive Plan was rezoned to R-4 under Ordinance 2675 . The property lies immediately west of the subject site on the other side of the Benson Highway. This would appear to suggest that there is no definite policy established to limit the use of greenbelt areas for vegetation as long as the intent of the greenbelt area is met it would appear that compatible uses could be permitted . 4. No buildings can be constructed under the powerline right-of-ways. Development will be limited to parking . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: (Rezone) It is recommended that the request for a rezone from GS-1 to R-3, Medium Density Multiple Family Residential, File No . R-028-80, be approved subject to the filing of restrictive covenants to limit the maximum lot coverage (parking and paved areas) of the site to 49%. The other 51% is to be covered in extensive landscaping plantings to fulfill the intent of the greenbelt designation . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS , R-028-80, Short Plat 029-80,W-030-80 APRIL 29 , 1980 PAGE THREE I . IMPACT ON. THE NATURAL OR HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Rezone of the subject site will not directly impact the property. 2 . Population/Employment : Minor . 3. Schools : Not applicable . 4. Social : Not applicable. 5.. Traffic : No specific clinic plans have been submitted so the traffic impacts may be better addressed in a future Special Permit application. J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/TWESHOLD DETERIMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, RCW 43-21C , a declaration of non-significance was issued by the Environmental Review Committee on April 2 , 1980 . The short plat is exempt from an environmental determination. K. AGENCIES/APARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1. City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division. 5. City of Renton Parks Department. L . PLANNING DEPARTIMEI'1! ANALYSIS : (Rezone) 1 . The proposed rezone to R-3 is not specifically consistent with the Comprehensive Plan land use designation of high density multiple family residential and greenbelt for the subject site. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan was to retain the areas under major power transmission lines as open space and greenbelts . Development under these lines would have to appear to fulfill the goals of the Comprehensive Plan designation of greenbelt . In this specific case , the Renton Elks Lodge is bounded on two sides by high power transmission l lines . The front portion of the site adjacent to the Benson Highway is developmentally limited by those high power transmission lines . The proposal is to develop that area not under the lines in a dental clinic and use the area under the lines for auxiliary parking to the dental facility. It would appear that parking and the greenbelt designation of the Comprehensive Plan are compatible if the intensity of the parking is severely reduced to emphasize the greenbelt theme . This would suggest an unusually high percentage of landscaping in relationship to the total site. The Parking and PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : RENTON ELKS, R-028-80, Short Plat 039-80 , W-030-80 APRIL 29 , 1980 PAGE FIVE L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: (Short Plat) 1 . The applicant has submitted a short plat which does not provide direct access onto a public street from Lot #2 . Lot #2 is presently developed with the Renton Elks Lodge and access is provided over an easement across P . S . P . & L . right-of-way . The applicant will have to correct the application and request an exception of the Subdivision Ordi- nance to allow access to Lot #2 by easement rather than the required frontage on a public street . M. DEPIPT0EINTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : (Short Plat ) The Planning Department recommends that the public hearing for File No . Short Plat 029-80 and waiver request W-030-80 be continued until the proper application for an exception is submitted and advertised. Proper legal notices can be placed in the newspaper to allow the=public hearing to continue on Tuesday , May 13th. - • , .. ,. 1 - . . i E. : iiii',/i J 1 'Jr •k•di t' ati ) __., is ,1„,.;•• , ' 10", milagt. ..... Llin2,10: il: ___Iisj;I:4 i:•';,+!411' _ ( I I . , 'IN ... ..m.,m.,,,.s. li...74.,5, -4,"ii 'rwliii:o„, W: Lrge,1 t7.... ,rotile:1,04....,r . :, 41 oww, 11. o •IN o ..,;46,......•- * ;an"' 4-41.1 m 1 P-• t '-.7 -,, ,. s ,‘,.. ,,,,,, ro- t- .,- \\44N, N 11111*4.::19111,,if::vraiLivillion.ramT!itty-litit.(177E17;16,:vmoill.:•:41:it, -11Tirkil-7:7::;i1,..:11;r.111.-Att,1141,;1,:„C irli:' 11:11r:111-::71144114: 'll :ilt,, ,**:rillii A'. --Ittit'l'-'':1.4:.11"k-:42. 111:111::4'in::. .":42-1.-1:: 1 H WED I 1 1 1• , ke m -, - ...., i 1111...., -A- II / : , ,t....-t I may, o .3.-4 ‘ 111 .474 lir ' I= \ r9995 I, =or. e ii eV \BO I ft'4 ' 5, 9 II 1 '.' - ' - , 4.9 '1194 ,t -",, I. . li , - "tt ri \ \' • .r_. I, • filk 1 t If IM all alW' - IV Sr ' VP / / .1 ,„'1 q , -L"' le ' I N 1011 11 \ I • L i' 1 '.3.1.5.21.."'5Call. •• .1! .0F..240, CI „ 33 CI ' N I I • / iii;, 1.i ..---. EIT .4 • El " DV R li 51 •., ii LI I .,,,,--fr.,--:>,:".41",••' t:tki‘ „..• ., 4 ..-4-"' ,...,- ..• - f0.? ' Lz..• ''''AMe .V \ sr, *Illit 1 '''''''' ''''l -,* - Aa' • . , I' n: =ID 6 0 „IL-. 'i• " 94. 9° A \ ‘ 1' Ss \ I isoortrossolleil°63.151.11 ... ' ' i 000s i .. i...tt-,stv - . • . , • , Y •'•-• ..,,,., , d ,t '',,,,, '•••••, • '0...*471. • • . .„., . .. 1 4' .• ''' 1 o . ,,,,,,,/, ...„ V .•r i' I - '•, . oo, 's...__--._________ \ '", i L.,i ., .i.,4‘.. ....,,' '', '4 ' ' r St.,. 4 • 4.." I k... .99, ' ''''. ,--Nomir 'qg r , •Is• ,,...,, , 4 • 1.44 ; .- - „ •- Vi‘. .‘';,,f ."•%•7.4,, ,,,7,-,:e, .---- ..`- ••• ..,,. , ,•,•.,r•• , ;, A '"I'',0,aro . , ,it ion • ---" • ....."' ........- „.... ,,,.. •-,..—,.-„,_:.----. 1......*- Gs._ I .,e rrOie;i1:,,,,I, , l'et,..r vii... TA,: - '` ' f. ,.h ,. •' •fe".. -- ,... i .• I 1 : ;,,,,,,4 le .,;. ! 1410 Ilk.' cliiiplI 04,,,'-' ...,.,ditill I 00 row ,re '*AI ':' ' • I 7,'I re el= __g_... ... 1 • i-P_P.- .''.. ...lr i, .----_-_•__-—, _,„k_'N• 11 €511. i441:, .1 . L _ , 0 9 :, 49 fl AI ::: 'RV IcispetAl , . ,i ___. ,,, .,., P4100111113 . •,:: R- — 111304„ , I— I, Lt L.91111401PAgi ; 4/ pi: Brir PIC% ' —.IS L.-. '''. Proi*AHM11.11 i • 1,:, -Ip i NEIV-,-/,':::"::: ''''Io *'N. •., *2Tir. : t:l;-400-2 71t.,: ft APP. .:111:11.4.0 .. , . ..m,•,,,..ia : ,, : . ,„ , \\'', i rr ammlIP , apc.‘ ow ....6, N... 7,,,,—I A i • to YY '' 0 I -fiwA„%-.4./Eisit oft, 1 ' ‘ 1 ii 'in sr • • 4 . "., .,----,. •• r •-irm as _ ;,,,„ \ N 43 f , t ,« *il= ** 11 0 1., \, •\ 'r , ''' . III aip Agri- , .-fA,.• .....,,.....4. .4,i.ii.,•,. , i. t „_ fig vii‘,,,v,,..,, ...., ,A 4ty 1 • 4E4 21113111—' 7 7. 1 , .,,, R - A.4.0.• dill' v \ ., ,..,. , _ , on - -alio ., 0:4•ct3 Orb i , t. i v. i& .)-,. 4;0 • __.,„ En ;0,4 e. ...c• .,,, ni , . IA ZS 1415 El i3I _ i• tallem...- . „ , , Pi e • to ur . 1 . , ____. _ •.._.0. • t , re, ° c•I. "' Mr I ; .... • '19 t .0.0 40 se 4,•.. 12i_,,, -• i . i, , - , s,..\., G .0.t--.....-.-• 4- it . : foo 1. !. 1J re .' ..EMI " ' • 1 , - 0• e .0. 1 4, i • . . ., •• .1V.4. , . • F.....i.. ,s\ S, ' 1:;5.I i 1 G ma 9 00 4 APPLICANT RENTON ELKS TOTAL AREA +2. 57 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS VIA EAGLE RIDGE DRIVE EXISTING ZONING GS,-1 , General Classification District . - EXISTING USE Existing Elks Club located on proposed Lot #2; the remainder undeveloped. PROPOSED USE Clinic COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Medium Density Multiple Family; Green- COMMENTS 1 • 1 l• i 1 , t , • 9/5994 Plannin 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT dOE ) DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 01 V-% (ele°4r Application :Re pri ® OAR- ® CS'4h A- I6e0P1� 1-Pc e AN•r(tu- 03e-59 40- 4,,z Location: 89911i IPAltAtainkf "teAgeeeparke tegglAW.NO Applicant: le 1,,,s 4,44v. C/€.A TO: _ _ Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ys1,Sii Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : 0,44_12 Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering . Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI G. FOR THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON /�� AT. 9: U A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF U ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TQ ATTEND THE ARC, E P SE PVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY . :OU P.M. ON REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved K Approved with Conditions Not Approved tignature of Director or Authorized epresentative j Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : :06-; Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved `iC�p L� CG�L 7 Signatur o ' DIrector or Author zed Representative Date iiiiVile° P1arrni1g 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT f� DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET k Application. .:y"F < $1e 14• D 4& 6s-1 Y'® gr0/'-ram 6”. Rc e•$94.160)0-(0- 030-Ekt) .'' 17.... .21;94; Location: ®ices ': ', :.,..4 ki% liteet j/f ee dri,Ai'WA/-4•3i/LL Applicant: 40404,404f4 / eshog Parks Department �° ,. TO. p SCHEDULED HEARING DATE t� ,. Police Department A,R,C, MEETING DATE : .r ,� .'%4) . Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering ' . , 11 Building Division ' Utilities Engineering _ - - Fire Department (Other) : , COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS. REGARDING THIS APPLICATION ' SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN FOR G THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON � � � AT 9: A a M. I N THE. THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF ARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE T AI�jTEND 'THE ARC, P SE P��VIDE THE COMMENTS TO' THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5S:OU P.M. ON �,� RE.VIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /j e: Pc -.0"/Oc''/2t-/c`a,) / _ Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved p�- //yve/r/UI.S AA'zD /1G' S:S ft'cul ( J 1`f5 c.S//74-C ,(3C 1.t-C.7/'% • 7,j2tyij CSC./E•(//C2.d&( Pk'/rC%cite , 2') 4 A-A7 /:s ?i 4 /�)/iL'C_ C'ciiL-S ,;<<'C• ;„e p/e. ('44JS l�-L/C j/d,/L_3 /tt'4/Z-f/' Q lci/Z/ ,../f'c"t/i _, , /f G/ c_0 i-N. /'%lc= %/1e-C //°'';'/c/-1 ?e.,::: ('c',O173 /'•C-,i ) ,;✓c'0'.4L:irt,t,_`, S it, i;---,' ;i-- r� . ,_,_ . /3-) ,`, (,,,_ _ , , ii._ ,' / ., Signature of Director 'or Au orized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : (,f%tir,I arr . Approved ./ Approved with Conditions Not Approved I I 1 01/ 5e . fir LoriW_ SYs o1-v. G4442co . o1/5a i-t sSwsn. •. Cco Ow +,aYG --Cov +S /16tu,::%-wai txi 66�'L�, ao w,orctt wo,a / 1 , /t CI') (:4P-,--- - 415/Co : Cinnatiira 'n 'rnirartnr nr Allthnri7ad 4anraeantativa nAtP P1 anni nc • 12-1979 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT v'f' !) DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEEN'° °sk App1i cati on:ReZatateek. 0012v60 61'16 453. 140t 1-41C • editor(W- ®_ ) ,f• 244 • • Location: :OP rwe Oft '� ' 1IS Aens r .!` ilceea ,C 4 Applicant: Apadspri 1 40/40A TO: Parks Department : p SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 94/Z��e4 Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : Pligg Public Works Department Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division ,:j' `. Utilities Engineering -`' cf ;'a�� P Fire Department y,,! :' I ; e (Other) : `) COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITI G FOR THE APPLICATION Tor CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON dAVRTMENT/DIVISIOVREPRESMATNETEHO : O A.M. FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF ABLE TQ A TEND THE ARC, P E SE /P/R,j/OOVIDE THE COMMENTS TO-THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : TRA g K ENGitAAWArtiA,Ce, Div. , Approved X Approved with Conditions Not Approved ®61/0EGaPm-t, 1" wiri# eetre.e.. o sire spi A I(QV em eitfri r /1:9 41C' 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: 1%3...ec_CA,..., 7t) Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Zeti--P2-------'-------- ' __ Si nature of Director or Authorized Representative Date. . FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No: R-028-80 Environmental Checklist No: ECF-554-80 Description of Proposal: Application for rezone from GS-1 to R-3 to construct a dental clinic Proponent: RENTON ELKS CLUB Location of Proposal: Between existing Elks Building and Benson Road Lead Agency: City of Renton This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on April 2, 1980 following a presentation by David R. Clemens of the Planning Department. Oral comments were accepted from: GORDON Y. ERICKSENsuggested that this application require site approval by the Hearing Examiner,. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-554-80 are the following: 1) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by: DAVID R. CLEMENS, Senior Planner, dated April 1, 1980 • 2) Applications : REZONE R-028-80 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: MOVED by Warren Gonnason to issue declaration of non- significance, SECONDED by Gordon Ericksen and carried unanimously. Acting as 'the Responsible Official, the ERC has determined this develop- ment does not have significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43: 21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for the declaration of non-significance: The subject proposal will be of such scope as to adversely impact the project site. SIGNATURES: John E. Qeffey, Director Gordon ':—Eticksen, planning Parks & Recrea -ion .7 Director Warren G. Gonnason, Director Public Works Department - • • .h, "µ *` • I ' 7z d ' ;• ..;': • GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN RENTON ELKS CLUB AND BENSON ROAD. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT . I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF • ARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON MAY 20, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 A.M. P.M. CONCERNING ITEM WI EZSNE U SPECIA:k, ' ER1T • SIT I APPROVAL WAIVER - OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, W-030-80 H ELI "4r MANAGEMENT PERMIT '.EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO ALLOW ACCESS BY EASEMENT . ° E-043-80 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED ViiITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ;y (Paid'Advertisement) ' ver ', NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL , DETERMINATION 1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW- COMMITTEE R• ENTON,WASHINGTON , 'The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , , hos issued a final declaration of non-slanificance for the following protect: RENTON AVIATION (ECF-557.80), AP. I PLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL IN I P-1 ZONE TO EXPAND EXISTING FA- CILITY FOR SERVICE AND MAINTE- NANCE OF AIRCRAFT, File SA-03810; i Property located at SAO W. Perimeter Rood,northwest corner of Renton Muni- , cipal Airport, i Further Information regarding this action is available in the Planning Deportment,Municipal I. Building, Renton, Washington, 235.2550. Any on- , Peal of ERC action must be filed with the Hear. Ina Examiner by April 30.1980. y Published:April 16,1980 • ' HEARING RENTON LAND USENOEOFUBLIC HEARING EXAMINER I RENTON,WASHINGTON 1• + A Public hearing will be held by the Renton Land j Use the Council Chambers,City ring Examiner at lHs op Renton,ular meeting ington,on April 29,1980,at 9:00 A.M.to consider r, the following petitions: • P 1.Kohl excavating (Kohl-Christianson Addl. 0 lion), applications for preliminary Plat approval for 7-lot single family detached I development,Flie PP•00040,and exception ( to subdivision ordinance regarding Pipes. , tern lots.File E•033110;property located at Iti 2.Schneider Conset struction Companya((HHinton), 1, opplicatianf for preliminary Plot approval for 20-lot single family detached develop- ment and Tract 1(toter to be developed as • multi-Iomily), File PP-023-80, and excec- lion to subdivision ordinance regarding Pi- ed south of�N.E.6th e Stand properofty Monroe •Ave.N.E. '3.The Boeing Company,application for site 01 approval for Installation of 10'x32 troller for •toe as dispatch office in M-P Zone,File SA lir - r - 02740:Property located on site of Building ,t ' 2 Benoroyo Business Pork,800 S.W.43rd. j ..... .4.Renton Elks Club, application for rezone - �j. from GS-1 to R-3 to construct Dental Clinic, 'If 4- .. f- File R-028-80: property located between 'Renton Elks R. ` v S. Renton El sCClub opPllub and ni Ioson Rn for lrse-io, Short Plot approval (Honehereff Short • Plot),File 029 e0;property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Rood. 6.City of Renton, applications for two-lot ,' Short Plot approval,File 040-80,and excep- - Hon to subdivision ordinance regarding lot 9 width, File_E-0/1.80; property located in E the public area In Block 46 of the ' which Is ed by Harrington IN,rected Plot of the Renton Highland No.or.2 1 Harr tonb Ave N.E.and N.E.12th 6f. E., fiile n the Renton Planniing of ies Deportnotedment.are on ent. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETI- TIONS ARE tNVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON April 29, 1980,of 9:00 A.M.TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. .2 • GORDON V.ERICKSEN, ,./ Renton Planning Director Published:April 16,1980 I x,. . r '. ..?i�'1� e. //i7;c NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 29 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A .M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . KOHL EXCAVATING (KOHL-CHRISTIANSON ADDITION ) , APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR 7-LOT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT , File PP-008-80 , AND EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS , File E-033-80 ; property located at S .W. Sunset Blvd. and S .W. 3rd Place . 2 . SCHNEIDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (HILLTOP) , APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR 20-LOT SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT AND TRACT 1 (LATER TO BE DEVELOPED AS MULTI-FAMILY) , File PP-023-80 , AND EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS , File E-031-80 ; property located south of N.E . 6th St . and east of Monroe Ave . N .E . 3 . THE BOEING COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SITE APPROVAL FOR INSTALLATION OF 10 ' X 32 ' TRAILER FOR USE AS DISPATCH OFFICE IN M-P ZONE , File SA-027-80 ; property located on site of Building 2 , Benaroya Business Park , 800 S .W. 43rd . 4. RENTON ELKS CLUB , APPLICATION FOR REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-3 TO CONSTRUCT DENTAL CLINIC , File R-028-80 ; property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Road . 5 . RENTON ELKS CLUB , APPLICATION FOR TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL (HANCHEROFF SHORT PLAT ) , File 029-80 ; property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Road . 6. CITY OF RENTON, APPLICATIONS FOR TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL , File 040-80 , AND EXCEPTION TO • SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING LOT WIDTH, File E-041-80 ; property located in the public use area in Block 46 of the Corrected Plat of the Renton Highland No . 2 , which is bounded by Harrington P1 . N .E . , Harrington Ave . N. E . and N .E . 12th St . Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON APRIL 29 , 1980, AT 9 :00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED : April 16 , 1980 GORDON Y . ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , GENE WILLIAMS , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public , in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the 15th day of April . 7 , 4 \ SIGNED : 2. : vL OF RA, A. U 41 © THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT CO' 235- 2550 o91'eLD SEP'�E�O�P April 11 , 1980 The Renton Elks c/o Professional Property Development 3000 N.E. 100th Seattle, Washington 98125 Re : APPLICATIONS FOR REZONE FROM GS-1 TO R-3 TO CONSTRUCT DENTAL CLINICK , File R-028-80, AND APPROVAL OF TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT (HANCERHOFF SHORT PLAT) , File 029-80 ; property located between Renton Elks Club and Benson Road Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on April 3, 1980 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for April 29, 1980, at 9 :00 a .m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours, Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : Roger J. Blaylock= Associate Planner RJB:wr cc : Triad Associates 1950-112th Ave . N.E . Bellevue , WA 98004 Renton Elks Club 1600 Eagle Ridge Drive Renton, WA 98055 NOTICE THIS PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN RENTON ELKS CLUB AND BENSON ROAD. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT . I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON APRIL 29, 1980 BEGINNING AT 9:00 A.M. 1. CONCERNING ITEM Elf I , REZONE FOFODENTAL TCLINIC i TR-028-8000NSTRUCTION • SPECIAL PERMIT III SITE APPROVAL • WAIVER • SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMr Ar TWO-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL - 029-80 FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE J FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOC; )/L)• LAND CONSULTANTS .•� • • GEORGE J. XENOS' 1 @ - • �-'" .7 (206 ) 523-3932 • 3000 N.E. 10.0 th Seattle , Washington 9 0 .5, - 4.e/ . NN March 24,. 1980 • Mr. Roger J: Blaylock City of Renton Planning Dept. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Short Plat and Reclassification applications Dear Mr.' Blaylock : • • On behalf of the Renton Elks and Dr. Hancheroff, I am' pleased to submit the attached Short Plat and Reclass- ification applications. Dr. Hancheroff has been practicing dentistry in Renton for over seven years and for the last two years .has been attempting to locate a permanent site for his practice. • • • • 'We wish to request a waiver for any improvements which would under normal circumstances be required as a condition of approval of the short plat. . There are no sidewalk improvements along Benson road at this time and theoretically -any improvements would not be utilized. Lot 1 of the' short, 'the parcel which Mr. Hancheroff 'will, be purchasing from 'the Renton Elks, is presently • zoned B-1 and GS-1. The GS-1 portion of the lot is all of that portion which is encumbered by transmission right of . way easements. It was our intention to utilize this area for parking and landscaping. However, we were made aware that this could not be done under its existing zoning. The reclassification which we are seeking will rezone the . GS-1 portion of the 'property to R-2 for the purpose of allowing the property to be used to meet the parking and landscaping requirements of the project. We feel that this is a logical request and one which will in no way be detrimental to the surrounding properties. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. • Sincerely, / • George J 110's V , . . , , CITY OF RENTON .'° 6iet/ ,41 PLAT APPLICATION -/. SHORT PLAT FILE NO. � '���� MAJOR PLAT "F�;+e�-N To DATE REC' D, / 57 TENTATIVE / �� � y APPLICATION FEE $ .�'' Z 47-4 PRELIMINARY II. .. ( ! ENVIRONMENTAL FINAL J �1 f�I® 1--. REVIEW FEE $ 4 i! RECEIPT NO. % 99C 41° Q` S M N O. s � .Q O�4 PUD NO. NNIN� _. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : . 1. Plat Name & Location 'iHancheroff Short Plat Benson Road and Eagle Ridge Drive 2 . No. Lots 2 Total Acreage 7•5 Zoning B-1 & GS-1 3 . Owner The Renton Elks Phone 226-1100 Address 1600 Eagle Ridge Drive 5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed Telephone ( X ) ( ) ( ) Electric ( X ) ( ) ( ) Street Lights' ( X ) ( ) ( ) Natural Gas ( X ) ( ) ( ) TV Cable ( ) ( ) ( ) 6 . Sanitation & Water: ( X ) City Water ( x ) Sanitary Sewers (_ ) Water District No . ( ) Dry Sewers ( ) Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 8 . DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION: TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED APPEALED EXPIRED 10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED II . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : DATE DATE BOND NO. AND TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . Rev. 1/77 • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM �, �d; f V lk.) � 9 ;; 6 . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY t � .•°'' I art Application No. o de c�lGr7 )% G�l�-fO t"�J Q�J • Environmental Checklist No. � G�/;-- ,`- ,J4z-r°0 iv_ P3O 0 '64 �y a, O'` �N� PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: Declaration of SignificanceDeclaration of Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance a Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS : .. 'Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies 'of which you are aware and which are rele- ▪ . vant to the answers you provide. Complete .answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers • should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion •may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State ' of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND - •- - - 1: -Name of Proponent The Renton Elks c/o Property Development • 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: 3000 NE 100th Seattle, Washingotn 98125 • • - --- 3. Date Checklist submitted March 25 , 1980 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5'. Name of proposal , if applicable: N/A 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general :design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : The parcel of property is Zoned B-1J and GS-1 under the existing transmission lines easements. We are proposing to utilize the B-1 portion for the placement of the building and reclassifing the GS-1 portion- to R-2 in order that we • utilize it for parking and landscaping. The building will be utilized as a professional dental facility. t . -2- .. ., 7. • Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well . as the extent of the land area' affected by any environmental impacts , 'including • any other. information needed to give an accurate understanding of the en.viron- • . g., . mental setting of the p.roposal ) : The project is situated at the in- tersection of Benson Road ' and Eagle Ridge Drive. It .contains . 2. 5 acres. It is vacant and has slope which is approximately ;:r; 10-20 % falling off the. the west., . 8. . Estimated date .fo.r completion of the proposal : Fall of 1980 ' 9. . List of all permits., licenses or government approvals required for the proposal • • (federal , state and local --including rezones) : . City of Renton Zoning reclassification . City of Renton Short Plat Approval - • . ' City of Renton Building Permit • 10. Do you have any plans for •future additions , expansion , or further activity ' related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain : • None - • .11. Da you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: None • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- . :,,';, '.posal if 'none• has been completed, but •is expected to be filed at some -future date, describe ,the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, • (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) . • (1) 'Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable .earth conditions or in changes in geologic X substructures? • YES WAY—BE NO (b) .Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over- X • covering of the soil? ' ' YES MAYBE- NO • • (c) Change .in topography or ground surface relief X , .? ''features? ' ES `MAYBE NE— • . (d) The destruction, •covering 'or modification of any ' X unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind- or water erosion of soils', X .either on or off the site? YES • MAYBE NO . • (f)'. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or ' changes in siltation., deposition or erosion •which ' may modify the channel of a river .or stream or the . - It,, bed of the ocean or any bay , inlet or lake?? • X k' MAY YES• . BE NO Explanation: Soils will need to be moved '.around on .the site • during construction. Existing topograghic relations be- • • tween the . site, developed streets• and existing grades will . be maintained as much as possible. 411110 _j_ . • 'ram^ (2) Air. Will the proposal. result in: (a) Air emissions• or deterioration of ambient air • X quality? YES MAYBE NO . X , ' (b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE NO I (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, • •t':'` or any change' in climate , either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: During construction there will be increase emmis- sions 'from .construction equipment and supplies. After com- pletion, the principle source of pollution will be carbon monoxide emmissions from the increase automobile traffic on ' the site. . (3) Water. Will the proposal .result in: (a), Changes in currents , or the course 'of direction of • X water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? • YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or . X • the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? YES MAYBE NO • (d) Change in the. amount of surface water in any water X body? YES MAYBE -NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration - 1,.' surface water quality, including but not limited to •temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO . (f) Alteration of' the direction or rate of flow of X ground waters? YES 'MAYBE NO • . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either .through direct additions or withdrawals , or through , . . . interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?' YES MAYBE NO tF • (h) Deterioration in. ground water quality, either through • direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , X • or other substances into the ground waters? YES MAYBE NO (.i ) Reduction in the' amount of water, otherwise available for public water supplies? . 7—ES MAYBE NO The introduction of imperviouse surfaces such as . _._ . . Explanation: asphalt, concrete and roofing will decrease absortion rates , . increase direct surface runoff, Stormwater will be directed •(4) toF oan approved proposalprly d t fined collection—retention system. ' (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora_ (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , • • - microflora and aquatic plants)? YES M YBE NU— (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or • ' endangered species of flora? • YET— M NO• . . (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or . in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing . x species? �"S MAYBE i10 (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural •crop? YES MAYBE NO Expl anati on- Existing underbrush , and trees will be disturbed to accomodate the structures, roads and parking facility. . As much of the existing vegetation wi.11 • be retained as possible. • Cleared areas will be replanted with species common to urban • areas. - -4- • • (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including . reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , t` insects or microfauna)? • X YES MAYBE NO r' r (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X • endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , • or result in a barrier to the migration or movement X • of fauna? • • YES MAYBE . NO ,• (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? xx YES . MAYBE NO • Explanation: , The population of, native wildlife, including squirrels and birds will likely be slightly reduced. (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO There will be an increase in noise levels in Explanation: the. vicinity of the project during construction. After con— • • . struction, noise associated• with routine operations .will only result from vehicular traffic to and from the development. (7) Light and •Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Low density light, fixures will be installed in the landscape and parking areas for security and safety purposes. '' (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of theX .. ' present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The development will result in a permannt improve— mentto a now vacant parcel of land (9) .Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : . • . • X (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? • YES MAYBE NO _. . X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO • The development. will create a short term increase . Explanation: • in the use of resources such as construction supplies. There will be a permanent increase use of natural resources associ— ated with heatinc and tr ns a i • • (10•) Risk- of Upset. Does the proposal it vO Ve a risk of an . explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to , oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) - in the event of an accident- or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO • . _...... . Explanation: • • (11)- Population. Will the proposal alter the location , distri- buti,on, density, or growth rate of the human population • • of an area? . TT- MAYBE NO ____ _ Explanation:. • • - m'a'-- .. -5- • (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing , or• • X {:, ' create a demand for additional housing? YES MAYBE iV0 •;:i,. rr°'' •. Explanation . • :1;" (13) .Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : • I' 0<., • (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X . YES MAYBE NO' °t ,}.; (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ' . . X movement of people and/or goods? YES MAYBE NO " (e) •Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO , (f) Increase in- traffic hazards to motor vehicles , X bicyclists or 'pedestrians? • ;.. YES MAYBE NO . • ;;ti.'.P The development will slightly increase the • Explanation: p traffic along Benson Road. However, this sould be minimal. t upon , (14) Public result inra� need for ces. lnew l hore paltered governmental roposal have an cservices or in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X NO YES MAYBE 1" (b) Police protection? >t,?;` '_ YES MAYBE NO µ hi ;',C (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO • (d) Parks or other •recreational facilities.? X YES MAYBE '1;. .'• (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO . • X . (f) Other governmental services? • 'e . YES MAYBE NO The development will slightly increase the Explanation: . „? ' demand for fire and police services. • • • (15) Energy. Will the proposal result. in : . (a). Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? Y.ES MAYBE NO ('b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require . .the development of new sources of energy? YES X B NO Explanation: Duilding construction and heating will use enerly. • Automobiles generated by this development will use gas and oil. (16) Utilities. Will ' the proposal result in a need for new systems, or- alterations to the following utilities : X (a) Power or natural gas? YES MAYBE NO X (b) Communications systems? YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X YES MAYBE' NO i • t\ • (d) ' Sewer or Septic tanks? YES MAYBE NO • (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO }`'/'` (f) Solid waste and disposal?' X if?'` YES MAYBE N0 • ;,' Explanation: . (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of • any health hazard or. potential health hazard (excluding '4;..' • . mental health)? . X • YES TOTE NO .,:,. . Explanation: . (18) Aethetics. Will the. proposal result ih the obstruction of • any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the . . propos.al result in :the creation of an aesthetically offensive •X `" site open to public view? • �,;,:,, . YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ' ' • (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the • X ;:': quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? • ;;;! •- YES MAYBE NO ;;i Explanation: _ (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the 'proposal - result in an , alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? • X. YES MAYBE N0 Explanation: - ' • III. SIGNATURE . . I , • 'the u'ndersigned, •state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It, is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ..-.?,,=,: ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon his checklist should • there be any willful misrepresentation or 'willful la k of full j)s ' r on my part. Proponent: . si ned . (name printed) • • = City of Renton . . Planning Department. • . 5-76 i H AJGFJ?Pt- T/ /CFjJl VP--' S,yn e T 9T 4110 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOC . LAND CONSULTANTS GEORGE J. XENOS 3000 N.E. 100 th Seattle , Washington 98125 October 1211979 Roger J. Blaylock Associate Planner City of Renton Renton Washington 980055 RE: Parking considerations in the GS-1 zoning Dear Mr. Blaylock: I represent a client who is in the process of acquiring a parcel of land fronting on Benson Road S. from the Renton Elks for developmental puroses. The property is presently zoned B-1 and GS-1. It is our intention to situate the new building on the B-1 zoned property conforming to all zoning regulations and utilizing the GS-1 zoned property for our ac- cess location and parking requirements. When we last discussed this issue , you indicated that there could possibly be a recent interpretation of the existing land use code which would prohibit our utilization of the GS-1 as planned. Please verify this issue at your earliest conven- ience for the feasibility of the entire project could be at stake. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, George Al(41)71-7— J. nos • -RF \G RICEI >d�te\17 OCT 16 1979 \�9 44.� ti A. DEPP1� time . • 80-043 ; Gore Xenos Yz„ 1'Renton Elks Short Plat 3-25-80 Legal Description Lot2 That portion of the West half of Section 20, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the west quarter corner of said section; thence NO°44'05"E along the west line thereof a distance of 329.59 feet to the southerly margin of. the Bonneville Power Administration 200 foot Diablo - Seattle Transmission Right- of-Way as described in instrument recorded under Auditor's File No.3560496, records of King County, Washington; thence N87°23'49"E along said southerly margin 856.68 feet to a point noted as the True Point of Beginning of Parcel 25 as described in instrument recorded under Auditor's File No. 6150334, records of King County, Washington, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; thence NO2°36' l1"W 100.00 feet; thence S87°23 '49"W 612.72 feet to intersect the easterly margin of Benson Road at a point on the arc of a curve the center of which bears N81°17'33"E 2835.00 feet distant; thence southerly along said easterly margin and along the arc of said curve to the left through a central angle of 7°34'29" an arc distance of 374.80 feet to a point of tangency; thence continuing along said easterly margin S16°16'56"E 337.58 feet to the northerly margin of that 120 foot strip of land described in that certain "Declaration of Ownership" recorded under Auditor's File No.5687370, records of King County, Washington; thence N74°32 ' 17"E along said northerly margin 480.60 feet to a point which bears S02°36' ll"E from the point of beginning; thence NO2°36' 1l"W 490.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Except that portion thereof lying westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the west quarter corner of said section; thence NO°44'05"E along the west line thereof a distance of 329.59 feet to the southerly margin of the Bonneville Power Administration 200-foot Diablo-Seattle Transmission Line Right- . of-Way as described in instrument recorded under Auditor's File No. 3560496, records of King County, Washington; _thence N87°23 '49"E along said southerly mar- gin 481 .46 feet; thence NO2°36' 11"W 100.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described line; thence S02°36' ll"E 675.65 feet to the northerly margin of that 120-foot strip of land described in that certain "Declaration of Owner- ship" recorded under Auditor's File No. 5687370, records of King County, Washing- ton, said northerly margin being the terminus of the herein described line. TRIAD ASSOCIATES 195041MAMENUEAUL ViraUTEN CY A s lalLINA CNEC; EC BY?EL %�� 1® r ,rG) AFFIDAVIT 8 0 � 11 • Imo` ]� F I , 0,0.4VZ/uf1 " Lam rLL,.P' Wel (.144—e_ , being duly sworn, declare that I am the ow'h o'' the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief . • Subscribed and sworn before me this i �'�' day of DA , 19 g© , Notary Public in and for th State of Washington, residing at (Name of NOtarX.. Public) i nature of Owner) • 7%Ot uf41.� 5 . 'E#1r1J , � 9�55 Address) (Address) (City) (State) (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) • CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 ENDIN& OF FILE FILE TITLE