Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA00-154
- o II 1 ins imm - o,, , " a ff 4 ,ac..\..:, a\\ '416V-.- i \I. \,0_,,,7,,\ lit ,I, iffilkimmum . \T,,,_:‘, -f I - 4i6s, sa.t.,\A_t ----, ,. _ k, ---- ,,,. • I . v--,-,. c; . t 0 •t o., • ., iii A ..7,.. .,55% ,. a W. •.. ow .---: ---;v. • % s.01 ,, .—igo. t. a:"'52 F! .C::F.0i.t 4 1 .1.'''‘','''t?.t.:\t• 0 . j en. 441 •li .. . . 0 , ..A\E: --- . 0.0*.„_-°•_, , .1.4 ..,. A- 1 im, -, & • ' s. \\ - -,.• .,0.--- • \ .0 '. - -1 n V \t, . , , 0 4 c .4,;. • \ Molly \\•0\1. \ i 1:3 . , •.:. 2A\ c> 23'''• ‘..00,„--•-'<>1 ff.' 4343° '- '4.i:lb*/. 0 • 00 st-s`p / _._ 41710,P oga . 1/7 ..;.„-* In ----,_ _ 0 f 4. •.. \ • lk • : \ \ ( . -#' iii,111111r "-..-..„0.,.... s e'..- . ‘ //117'-"W/ .s.57a-•-"..\ ItisO• A . \ \ ... '17:.,4. \ 'S ' Ei \ t:-6- ..--- ., .. ..,, ji,' CZa- . A .-"' .--'-..-...‘.,,,,---0 a-- 0, 200 400 1 •, 144 .I tiliti;V 01 .0 1 • A L,--•;.-4.; .. -1 !=!! 1 _ - , _., ,. .,...,--.„ _, .1 2400 I , ‘\'.\-n-.\_..'\°.-'r\,-..,.,,'\-'\.O.,6-„\-\.--I•:"1-e,\-•,--\^..'.•0-C\--I:.•.5C0,A-)\.,),\.• ,.\.--a%.-,c.'\_4.),\S.,-.,,:..,-,1..0\,-\-.-v,p0„\'-c\r V v-0•\5\"•,.'.j.e s0°.\9's'-\-.\--".-*--\*\6-,%_.\'...a..\-,N-.,.,'-\\.'-.,-'0c\-.'-'..--',..\\_\-1 1,v.f`\\.-"3%...\_.--•0 \.\\ \\---.-\ ..'I 0,.,2,..<2e_•.*-‘0 -T,.-:rt-.'_iC-I c.0•..\\'..„c -c\.•- -,-,,\•,-.,-P,24-..,0;0:,r-)-.-,,,s0S„5,(,‘'yt,x.t.0o.,.%-,-..,s'o.)%0'-.,- 9,*0r‘•s .p•,.—_-,...,, o..,1• .2 ._:,_•j 1i_ LI.N6. ( •\ a ; 0 A p 04 ./_. .-.. 71.: ..!JI I. _. . . .! -- ..1 05 i • -... : • ' -' 4 *....„ _ f -------,. .. ,, d\ ---- ...- --- \cp\o.\, . P.ark Qk•\;`\: , co' ,• tait"010". \ 1 . 0 .--.. —,-...,...‘, Wir 6 / • . • ,.,. . • I / '''..''' .\.„..,....... „...„.....,,....\ / . // i Ill Renton •mm Ity '. ,nter ----___ / li --- / . i • /a*--_____. •,. /414 i ------- ri i , _mouton:1km jszert 1 iii ,eter 5.- -.....„_./.* 6-,-------40,/ c efte ROC" / '\-----=_Allite Coq \ i et Alper . /ir /00 • \ • d\\\ Cedar love ,,,s ._,, ..• \.__------ol,lit // //III r -—_ 0 0 '\ ,. \.,°1-. ‘',. \ \ /4 ' IAN .„..-•\ s,,0 .A. C3 0,,,,vg,,,,-•-•• \:- sollts ' \ °'' ‘\. • . \ V o4b _OW • . \ 1\ A. \ ir- C). :\ - - : .. ' • \$\ . Eit\ ,,,, ' \\ t's '\• -'0". °--%\''.---'''. \:- '.' 00 (-1 ./ , • . v ! _-. -- \ P-- _.---1. 1:2400 - / , ', --- . ."--(V, ,- . \- - • - - • _® REN—E01 .�.n =16 RENTON REPLACEMENT OF WELL EW-3 .A e/m 1 50%SUBMITTAL PM 3/31 ,,,., m - I owoa I '� log y� \a Gra�991Zimma10r,OO PO..Bd,minlelroo'. E-3 NO.9 REVISION BY DATE MPR .�,,;� «��• /�yyyy�� TELEMETRY CONDUIT ALIGNMENT y"` E aV01. �tWaO G•IG ��� IeWa i"°iAi 7 100 ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES INC. g 696 COLIMBIA ST.N.W.OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 9B507-0976 j i(IP11 999 sf do- •BELLENff WASNINGTON •OLYMPIA WASHINGTON •PdtUM OREGON • — CEogR RIVER $11m es i N AV Go. \ W 4e V' i'ti t' \ / PTATJ4r1W ° < ego o l/A;I 0 /-•—g, l I //// /01/®./111 D , yam I ° _$ ri Jl lll/111 ill l gill /ll�/ll . __.. �� 8( '"� r.) IIIII 1111 /1 //// ,• 11 l;;/ / /IiI i ; ,�f' mii ��- ))//l1Ig/ l//all ' `� e 8 p0 cs in 3 1 \r `\V((// / /hill/ , 1 / ----,/ z �� \aZfi !!WiTi � / —i H A 0 ittammi,in,....-- ,.._=, lii ..ji,/,10,----- i ' l'. i I/' 7/ ,,k, I 5;s (, iffM7 A loyfigair, 1 \ _ ///1 11 ir(//(11V7 - Wit 1 r V Li � 11 i/l� /�Ill1I1/ _ - -Li pith IN 11 {' I „ I oRWi r2 "/1I// !IJ/ 1 I • µr � B ^b e eep1 � I P 0 0 o I / �,� v * . ,-\''''''. a — a- s -./ 0 13 IN � o, o p i OPV. b� O Oo0 r— . ror 1 H o I Jsr •_ a , F /I\ / / a J � o Oil M 8F / Iv r EH ; . F I '2w8 Z "II Pig 2 ri FP I 7 mgP A a1\ sas ER itI a -- --) c4 i zg /I\ I: Iosi_Jo o 0 0^7r P �� ap / � 1, 1 y a co E --I a r 1-7.-- v.(;):. '• • ,, \, '26,c,1\''PH•\' 'C .,C) \, ,•• \\' O. ''.' O'' \ 0 \''' 0\, ' •,. . , ',. •\•• •01). ‘-.0, . . \ \ '-.--i \ ___-,- ,,,, l'-• . • \ ''' ).'• ''C , .. '„,, 'c). 2,..\,\------ 1-J-- -,_,_,,, .., •,./(.. . , \ . • . •- ,0 ' \-N.• ., •.., ) -- -•.., ,„ : ',. A \\.• 0 .•'•'\ \<,'• \ . \ ' • 4_,/..----.• .i '''-'CH 1 '-•,,,,....._ .\ \\., 0 (\‘,. \\,,,, 9,,,,,, \„,CP, 02,,,,,\ ,._...,:,, . ..)•,-7,..:-.:::::;... ,c, .'c-\ ',..,, ,sc-\_,1 ...,........, .. .., • ,,. ' " c:'''\--'• \ \ \-----_, sv -4,---- , -,, ____ , . c ,\2J• --„.. __________.. ' \ 0 . , ,\,J , \, 0 __ ..)-;. - -- , c-\ .1 \-, .-,---." .1 • , '. 0 - :,?). ''''. :,•-"%-. .10- \ \V% k\0• 1 .----5:"--',"‘-'1 . r 1 ... • .-- .................. __.._. . \ \ .„---- ---- .. '... 1. '\'L.. \\\Q-'3--- -.5.----'-- \W..'"'-'-' \ *• ..1.-•f7-- -"- -'d , .. ..... ...., ----- , .----::•-•,-\,,, 11 \ ,-. -- _,. ...,- , Y. \ s • - .„\ \, .\ ',V ...--,-- . - .• ,.....,...........„. „ \N . — . •-' , 1 i , , . , ,, 0 . _,, .. , • -- ''.• ' ; ' \\-- .\s----\ \ -- \••---- - 0 'c- ..., -_,...t.-.:,.:....,.....--.. 1 -. li-1 ----- .•-•' ; . . ' n . •••,., .,.,., 0. .,,, ,,,p.„,.- . ....\ •... \, ----* '0\ I.\ , ----------. N\ ... 'C ',),\ , . . k W„,„„! .•0, _,,,, , .., c, \ \ ; i I I ' .•' ] • \ 7 .... 'A.. -0'. • .. 0.2\..\,.\.. 71\ • - v 1 ‘ , I . C-_\e 0 .. ' •)', %n 0 ..\\ 4•\ .. ..)'"'''''''. '''''.--. \ '1) . \\---- -c-- \ \ 6 • ) . \---• 0 \ „,,. \,,,,. .0\,, . .•:7.-) ., - ‘„,..,-,-.7-..,c. \ \00 \ tj,.„ 0 \:\:7.. \‘‘ ,,.-H ,,,\ .\,\..„.,..._., 0 ..(:::,) ...,.-: \t• CVAl ' . ‘7i — \c• ii , .----.. 'C •\ 0 \ . ". , • „,,,ok ‘ 0 ‘ ,cp,c::::),0\-Wio. \ • \ ' $0'..'''''1,,_„„" C' 0 .\ \ „....-.H „.- ,, C6-. , • - ________-, \ \ 11101 , ,,,,•:____, ., 11•94;11%°‘. \ , , \ .....'t.--SX---- :::-.-'0, ... \ \ \....• '----, "' ,..'---- , • ••\ • --eps,„--... .„ „, \ ' \ ,7) ,,, --,..,, -•,..,.., ..,, . , \--, „,4, ..•.,,,.. • ... o• , , / • ,. \ f `. 0 \ \o ...:•.... • , .., . :.., , . i , --•:::-".) • Ppric . ... .. • . . . .; ' • t',;, •. . , (,,o, , , • • 65\ . //. • • .1 0 *\6 / ---- ,.- 0 1 ..' •,\ Itit .N.- / .* . ---- 4seitt PN* •Vill',. . - \ a Q ),.0 W , y 0 -- ----\C)' ---\ ,i D iikf-s") - ... .• ..., ..\ ... 0 0 : . :, \ ,, • .. .• . • . 0. . :--:---.1.8-1-z..... .. s, . . . • . i . , Renton / , 1 ! 0 ---1'.::-.:-\ I .mm nity ,. _ 4° ' al i . -nter il 1 ....,....--,...... t ------:.---L /,•• ----7 0 i • ( 1 , • ,,/ „ :, ....... . // „/,' _ [ 1 t I __NS , / • wrrivxr4 2,0o-Fr 0 --- , ',----,.// et; •...tIsTRuare ARVik eater /,/ OP czPftik 9.VitSt% /. ,- •Q‘ - %.,y Am •J / / • /. /.; . .'.. •••--,.... a° Rit, /" / i r. .............„._ al' /..' '.'• ', ......._. Cedar Fp_ .ver 1 0 ',„ , / _.......'''''_....., ,....... . . ... _. r• . . „....... ,. _.. .• r ...- -‘ .ii. .: \ , / ...,, ...-- ' t!%,,--4-1(..„ ..___..----- .....---..........-,........., : \ --- / / / .—......—......., ..- ,.- ) . , ,,... ... ... . ‘ / / ,--------- ..-<•'5'.. ., • .. ...,... ..... .,... .. . : 0 •\(.1)0, \ , / 40 \ .• • aCrr° ••., ,fr. • \ •, ,) . • , .-.„ . \ ,.,...,,,,\\...,... .,.:.."...i.... ...itt,,..„..c..,‘„,,N...,.,.v......,,,.,..:\,. .,,..,..-..,,..,...,,....,,..... . , .e. , iits‘). #,iO4‘• 0 • . \dd.\ . .. . \ 0\ .., ' '. \'/ 0..% / 'S?V‘t • • . .n\1\ ..', \ 4,„., ,,,, , -t.....,,./,-•_,-, .•:,-_:„.„,_,.••• ., • .\$`'• / . • , . • A \ ,,,., . .. ; . . . ,• . • . • ,-, , ----) . . / l ', ' ,\ . • Fr'/ - - ., . \ \\., \ / c,C,../ I/.• '' , \ ° •.. . • • • • :, .• : • 1'1--.-_,':iTh•,-,... .0: ' . • / . / ,/ .. %:0, ). ', C: .., ,.• .„.. .... • \ 0\ lip ii..r., 01 ' ..Q. .. . ••... . . •• .• ' :.. \ . ...- . 1 .; , 1 ii-e! ittlia, c6 .0 )111,iii, .0 : is. ..• , . ,. .. „ , .4. 1 , -,Iri i ,... ,,A,, .. . A, \ 1 .,., -;• ooxft..._. •„.;c:,, -‘. .-..)-,,,N5-.N.1::7:77,:,7,:l '11. .P1-11101 1 - ' ' .: p! . .., .. .• • ....,.,..,,:,,,,, ,,,- - -- ----- .2, „.. re' , i -.._ 1 1., , / ,-1 iL ,...-7 Z. :' , . .. ----\... <•- -. .,,---\ I :2400 ., \ \ . 1 Z ser 00 — 1sr 11 � 172305901206 172305901305 I11 172305901404 CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON j CITY OF RENTON BENNETT W E I BENNETT W E j 200 MILL AVE SO 200 MILL AVE SOUTH i 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 172305904309 ' f 720006105 CITY OF RENTON STATE OF WASHINGTON ' 200 MILL AVE S DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RENTON WA 98055 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING OLYMPIA WA 98504 ' 1 • -- --- - - J I I I lil I ', I I i ' I • • • ' I I 6,091 S aoi apidwai asn Wls;aagS paaj q oows ,STATFO .., cif. ,,,p' !!!' ..- ,..ii ,? h', 1N89 a 0 . STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190- 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008-5452 • (425) 649-7000 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING February 8, 2001 CITY OF RENTON FEB 13 2000 RECEIVED Tom Malphrus Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. 1055 South Grady Way Renton WA 98055 Dear Mr. Malphrus: Re: City of Renton Permit# LUA-00-154-ECF, SM RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit# 2001-NW-40005 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to construct approximately 10 feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 100 feet of 2-inch telemetry conduit at approximately 1500 Houser Way North within shoreline jurisdiction of Cedar River in the City of Renton, has been filed with this office by the City of Renton on January 31, 2001. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21-day appeal period, February 21, 2001. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. • If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, r `I 1,, t Marcia Geidel Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program MG:mg SDP.DOC cc: Steven Taylor, City of Renton .. '18 CO CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: January 30, 2001 To: Tom Malphrus/Utilities From: Steve Taylor/Development Plannir Subject: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project Project No. LUA-00-154,ECF,SM This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed on the ERC determination. The Shoreline Substantial Development Permit(SM)was mailed to DOE on 1/30/01. If you have any questions, please contact me at 430-7219. FINAL • On the 30 day of 10.V Ua.K4 , 2000, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing stloreiltAe peVvvt documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Deft Of C EGOIOau R*b e — 'roues W�a lrin to tS < <n- lncu.se v►.4,1 (Signature of Sender) sot-Nulty k . Se.cper STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I.know or have satisfactory evidence that��1�,is . (�C� signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act fore uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Da d• kiik NI KA ' Notary Public' and for the State of Washingto NO1ARY PUBLIC STATE OF VVASHINGTON Notary (Print) MegiLyN KAtificAFFF COMMISSION EXPIRES My appointmenlcp{ap®INTMENT EXPIRES:6-29.03 JUNE 29, 2003 Project Name: Lieu \Ai ,3 1 kw e1 y PvvJ e c-t Project Number: LU 14 . 00 — 154, 5W1 g(,p NOTARY2.DOC ,� CITY C. RENTON • NAL ; Planning/Building/Public Works Department MOM J e Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 30, 2001 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue,WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial'Development Permit for File No. LUA-00-154, ECF, SM Gentlemen: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on January 30, 2001. We are filing this action with the Department of .Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at (425) 430-7219 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Steven Taylor,AICP Project Manager Enclosures: Copy of Original Application Site Plan Notice of Application Environmental Determination cc: Office of Attorney General City of Renton,Transportation Systems City of Renton, Utility Systems • Shortino Ltr..doc 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer ti CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: LUA 00-154, SM, ECF DATE RECEIVED: November 30, 2000 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: December 7, 2000 DATE APPROVED: January 30, 2000 DATE DENIED: NA TYPE OF ACTION(S): [X] Substantial Development Permit [ ] Conditional Use Permit [ ] Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW,the City of Renton has granted a permit for the construction of approximately 10-feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 100-feet of 2-inch telemetry conduit in the Houser Way North within 200 feet of the Cedar River. This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: City of Renton Contact: Tom Malphrus 1055 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 PROJECT: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project DEVELOPMENT The project includes the construction of approximately 10-feet of 8-inch DESCRIPTION: chemical containment conduit and 100-feet of 2-inch telemetry conduit within 200 feet of the Cedar River. On January 19, 1999, the City of Renton Planning, Building & Public Works Dept. received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project(LUA-98-185, CU-A, ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3, construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City's Corrosion Control Treatment Facility, and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the Well 1,2 and 3 building. When the City applied for SEPA, the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available, the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River (herein referred to as the project). SHSUBDEV.dot City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 2 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The project will take place within the paved portion of the Houser Way right-of-way at approximately 1500 Houser Way North. SEC-TWNP-R: Section 17, Township 23, Range 5 WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Cedar River APPLICABLE MASTER City of Renton PROGRAM: The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page RMC 4-3-090E Regulated Water Bodies Page 3-20 RMC 4-3-090J Urban Environment Pages 3-25 RMC 4-3-090L18 Utilities Page 3-37 to 3-39 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall follow best management practices for all construction activities adjacent to the Cedar River. 2. Temporary erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. 3. All restoration shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division within 30 days of construction completion. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. Wel /IP 2/0 Pla ning/B i Pub' o ks AdminTstrat r /Date cc: Attorney General's Office City of Renton, Plan Review(Kayren Kittrick) City of Renton, Surface Water Utility(Ron Straka) City of Renton,Water Utility(Abdoul Gafour) SHSUBDEV.dot MrSID Image Server:MrSID Image Viewing http://rentonnet/sid/bin/show.plx POWERED BY rSID MAR MrSID Image Server by LizardTech g, #,ter ' . s g jfie '''''' ''''.7:4°.*:4111111r"-----'-'7''') : . i+ - dry. ‘5 r.-_,A!f,]'.,`,;;;-",1,ik.-, 4gWs n" x 8'd.. T s- ' 8' "0":e' ;�, �. ff ter. + " ' ._ Wit:.. : f Current View - 640 x 480 pixels @ 50% zoom Set the zoom and size then click an area on the image. Zoom to 100 I'(% Size 640 x 480 1-;1(pixels) With Plua-in I No Plug-in I Java I Help Download MrSID Online Viewer Plug-In MrSID Server Documentation LizardTech, Inc. 1 of 1 12/15/00 1:06 PM - �, CITY C -' RENTON 'ft.Ii i Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 10, 2001 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determination Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on January 9, 2001: • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE WELL EW-3 TELEMETRY PROJECT LUA-00-154,ECF,SM The project includes the construction of approximately 10-feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 100-feet of 2-inch telemetry conduit within 200 feet of the Cedar River. Location: The project will take place within the paved portion of the Houser Way right-of-way at approximately 1500 Houser Way North. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 29, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal . process may be'obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If you have questions, please call me at(425)430-7219. For the Environmental Review Committee, • Steve Taylor Senior Planner cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources WSDOT, Northwest Region Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) US Army Corp. of Engineers ACENCYLTR\ 1055 South Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 ..) This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer \ CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM. Date: January 11,2001 To: Tom Malphrus/Utilities (1) /From: Steve Taylor/Development Planning / Subject: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project Project No. LUA-00-154,ECF,SM This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on January 9, 2001, decided that your project would be issued a Determination of Non- Significance. The City of Renton ERC has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 29, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application, fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, a public hearing date will be set and all parties notified. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at 430-7219. dnsmemo CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-1 54,ECF,SM APPLICANT: City of Renton • PROJECT NAME: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The project includes the construction of approximately 10-feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 100-feet of 2-inch telemetry conduit within 200 feet of.the Cedar River. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project will take place within the paved portion of the Houser Way right-of-way at approximately 1500 Houser Way North. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these:notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations' PLAN REVIEW 1. Protect existing drainage facilities by using and maintaining TESCP measures for the duration of the project. . advisorynotes y , CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The project includes the construction of approximately 10-feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 100-feet of 2-inch telemetry conduit within 200 feet of the Cedar River. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project will take place within the paved portion of the Houser Way right-of- way at approximately 1500 Houser Way North. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14) days. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 29, 2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: January 15, 2001 DATE OF DECISION: January 9, 2001 SIGNATURES: G19 ��im - / C( regg Z a Departme oan, c istrator DATo Pla ning/Building/Public Works . i�/d/�/ J epherd, Administrator DATE �wr_.. C munity Services Department /— fe, ) — °/ L elm e Chief �! DATE Ren on Fire Department dnssig CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT NAME: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The project includes the construction of approximately 10-feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 100-feet of 2-inch telemetry conduit within 200 feet of the Cedar River. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The project will take place within the paved portion of the Houser Way right-of-way at approximately 1500 Houser Way North. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations PLAN REVIEW 1. Protect existing drainage facilities by using and maintaining TESCP measures for the duration of the project. advisorynotes AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Ai Barbara Alther, first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the • SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 . NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal I DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six . . COMMITTEE months prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the RENTON,WASHINGTON i The Environmental Review I English language continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, i Committee has issued a Determination I Washington. The South County Journal has been approved as a legal of Non-Significance for the following ' I • newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King Renton Municipal Code.ect under the thority of th County. ,WELL EW-3 TELEMETRY PROJECT The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South LUA-00 154,ECF,SM y CountyJournal not in supplemental form)which•was regularly distributed to ofE approx. 100l review for constructionchemal 8 ; (andpp g y � approx. feet of 8-inch. chemical � ' the subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a _ ,containment conduit and 100-feet of 2- inch telemetry conduit within 200,feet I of the Cedar River. A shoreline Well EW-3 Telemetry Project substantial development permit is required. Location: 1500 Houser Way J as published on: 1/15/01 ,North. J • determination must be filedals of the r inn wrintal ' ting The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of ' on or before 5:00 PM January 29, $53.13, charged to Acct. No. 8051067. '2001. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner, Legal Number 8623 ,City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to 1 re ,the Examiner are governed by City of4G, 1 _ a(IC 'Renton MunicipaloainformationCode Sectione in 110. Additional regarding the g y i froml s obtained Legal Clerk, South Count Journal tte Rnton Citylerk's O )(425)-430-6510. Published in the South County I Journal January 15,2001.8623 Subscribed and sworn before me on this I lfday of ) .g r , 2001 --__ ___ . - `��\11111I111I/j� —_-__ �Ag:'�' • � �o1Ayy `r .N LT : ©� _ �0-� , • POBOG Notary Public of the State of Washington %v'f�.F� 0•:,�02� residing in Renton '''•,9���F INAS...... - King County, Washington �1uSitiiit ' . 4 N (11 v . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: WELL EW3 TELEMETRY PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA•00.154,ECF,SM The project includes the construction of approximately 10-feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit • end 100-feet of 2-Inch telemetry conduit within 200 feet of the Cedar River.On January 19,1999,the City - of Renton Planning,Building&Public Works Dept.received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and en Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project(LUA-98- •. . 185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project Includes the construction of a building to house a well pump end equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project Is the construction of a sewer line - . . to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals ' from the City's Corrosion Control Treatment Facility,end construction of a telemetry conduit between EW- ' 3 end the Wall 1,2 and 3 Building.When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fat within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply fora Shoreline Substantial Development Permit.With information that Is now available, the City has determined that en application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed.This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Ceder • River. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE . ENVIRONMENT. Appeals of the environmental determination must be flied In writing on or before 5:00 PM January 29,2001. Appeals must be flied In writing together with the required$75.00 application fee with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8.110. Additional information regard(ng th``eapvaplpeal procceess maybe obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-030.6510. o��\\$ %.V o `IIIII `;-(� 02 il i �d ! yr -t, . ... alii.v., ....vp `l`' i'-.\Thigtr il --:-.1:1,‘ --A1A,-..t..L. ik I 7 , .;.,..v.illii. „iiin !.., ....Ast.....‘low__.. .... .44 . l-......, ''..;-,..- -isi,:Ail. .\.. ,,,, a k .. Ar.' ' . e1/I" • 4r-*"PT 111 N r, I, ....:..a;, r•-• .•, • 4' .o. I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-7200. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. 1 CERTIFICATION -- I, v,c..e_ 3 (A , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in .3 conspicuous places on or nearby . the described property on ..,) , \ .. 1 • Signed: a,_- 7'2 - ATTEST: Subcribed and sworn before me,a Nortary Public,in and for the'State of Washington residing in ip_ri At , on the,„r1 day of )770_,L ey/ Z o./ )9?C "G9 iitill MARILYN KAMCHEFF NOTARY PUBLIC t ' STATE OF WASHINGTON r 4 COMMISSION EXPIRES r` ".`,:..: :d JUKE 29, 2003 r.,,,jyk�;'.�.I,,;,�t^li E�,1 rt.,N -AP[R S .,!�'P.+' 1 1 ,J�".,iJ A'lii.+J"d�'4kb�'LTE�Jd C..d.1 d L_I'sd 6Y d� � :i+"1.ro},' STAFF City of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: January 9, 2001 Applicant: City of Renton Tom Malphrus, Staff Contact Project Name: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project Project Number: LUA-00-154, ECF, SM Project Manager: Steve Taylor Project Description: The project includes the construction of approximately 10-feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 100-feet of 2-inch telemetry conduit within 200 feet of the Cedar River. On January 19, 1999, the City of Renton Planning, Building & Public Works Dept. received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project(LUA-98-185, CU-A, ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3, construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City's Corrosion Control Treatment Facility, and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the Well 1, 2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA, the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available, the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River (herein referred to as the project). Project Location: The project will take place within the paved portion of the Houser Way right-of-way at approximately 1500 Houser Way North. Exist. Bldg. Area gsf.• N/A Site Area: Approximately 720 square feet RECOMMENDATION Staff recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) ercrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PW Departme, Environmental Review Committee Staff Report WATER WELL EW-3 REPLACEMENT TELEMETRY PROJECT LUA-00-154,ECF,SM REPORT AND DECISION OFJANUARY9,2001 Page 2 of 3 B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: XX DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations PLAN REVIEW 1. Protect existing drainage facilities by using and maintaining TESCP measures for the duration of the project D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. 1. Earth Impacts: A backhoe or a trencher will be used to excavate a narrow trench for placement of an 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 2-inch telemetry conduit within the Houser Way right-of-way. At this location Houser Way is a 4-lane, one-way arterial improved with approximately 44 feet of pavement,with curb, gutter and a sidewalk on the west side of the street. The soils underlying the roadway are composed of structural fill over sand and gravel. The project site is flat,with roadway slopes of less than 2%. Restoration will include an asphalt patch for the affected street, and repair of all sidewalk, curb, gutter and landscaping that is disturbed as part of the construction. Standard erosion and sediment control BMP's will be used during construction. All trench excavation will either be covered with steel plate or backfilled the same day. Final roadway patch will comply with City standards Mitigation Measures: No further mitigation is recommended Nexus: N/A 2. Air Impacts: During construction, onsite emissions will consist of fugitive dust and exhaust from construction equipment. These are anticipated to be minor and largely confined near the construction area. ercrpt.doc City of Renton P/B/PWDepartment Enviroi;_ .dal Review Committee Staff Report WATER WELL EW-3 REPLACEMENT TELEMETRY PROJECT LUA-00-154,ECF,SM REPORT AND DECISION OFJANUARY9,2001 Page 3 of 3 Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is recommended Nexus: N/A 3. Water Impacts: No new impervious surface is proposed. No change to the surface water runoff pattern is anticipated. Paved surfaces and drainage will be restored to pre-construction patterns. Mitigation Measures: No mitigation is recommended Nexus: N/A 4. Transportation/Emergency Services Impacts: Construction of this project is scheduled to begin in Marchl, 2001 with estimated completion at the end of April 2001. Construction hours will be from 8:30 a.m.to 3 p.m.,with no work on weekends anticipated. Development regulations require a traffic control plan for all construction activities with the City's right-of-way. These plans are review by the Transportation Section to ensure coordination between the projects and to keep Police and Fire Departments informed regarding any temporary road closures. Excavation for the conduits will take place within the Houser Way right-of-way. One lane of the roadway will need to be closed at times. Travel on Houser Way will be restricted to 2 or 3 lanes during construction of the utilities. Final restoration will include patching the affected streets to City standards, as well as repair of any curb, gutter, and sidewalks,that are disturbed by the construction of this project. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are recommended Nexus: N/A E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process: Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM January 29, 2001 (14 days from the date of publication). Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-110. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. ercrpt.doc 1 �a �\ / a O .... . "1, ` . . ` im,r • \ \POO. Ic51,-\ 11 . . 1111110 4 \ `d '•C j ,Q �a c,A• . N .t# • rho , 1611%.,„„„„„„ "\ f'..-vV4.C:) dga,. \ .. , `\*\...° *I64k.r---- 1. i , ,-.:,1 ,\. -V)--'-..-t 0 .flith' 127 W Moo • 0 ,:.•••6 0. N...-e%alli,,,-- 7 PP • 0, a: \... 1 -•Ci `� .4 •*\, ;o . ., "' .U01 0 ..- °e , 0- GI ..A j I .,A Ift . os.A.A.: .4 t.... --4.,:).kcs-,4 \ \ ,,,,--„;,\ • czi Mil """' 41 It"4;" • 1. •#- \r - ;, i •Q\,..-. .\ •A. 491`..\---- . , ._•- V 4 ‘ 1 '\,.,,,,,, " OV. G - A, . .4.... ! 0 Liberty ,``. o �`✓ 1 Park : I Oi \ di `A. *** „No 0 ., '� 0 �O ENS` 4 '` ) IO /��-,a / i ( Renton / I I •mm ity 7/-\) #I flier i I ii ll o i/ — .rnFSNI Zd . O �. -•... ater l / r" . `/ `` A Ceder II �I R/v®r i�i C®d . /�/// � er !Aver ` 1) I-it- - - p0 -- . ' /4147 -001-P.--""":-\\- O's*040 .....•-------- ..,.....t .. 2. ` `�, \\✓ 4 oo`'e 1 • iz400 • i • �. REN—E01 • ciao • =.a lin CITY OF 9 ro+c I ==� ® RENTON REPLACEMENT OF WELL EW-3 1 Sox SUBMITTAL _ Pu a/Jr P.k1.011.1211 ,�..E_] .s^R 1.� .A uiCsq/ e vim..DapL E-3 NO. BY DATE ABM ^D TELEMETRY CONDUIT ALIGNMENT ..— f�ii►»n l.�aa-mr `E) 676OC" SL ILK QYIW/.,ELGTwp1a91sl,v,Irs INC. 0 4 • NAL•ICTOD •CLAIM W.DI ICT I •MUM tlRtOI •c €i4� E'AR Rw I t ss VE 1,C R . 7F /'07/ 4,114p7fr''' '> iV v\ :„/ /////7 i / < 1Zo / b;/ 1,10% f ill i rii o I//// ////4•• 1nftilk.‘*-- _�-I 73 JIllllllIiil /ll /l�j/l/ ) x( "'IPr \ �IIIIII��III�,;rllil�i�liiir'- --AFT:. ;% ` o-I p I I ��/ )l l ,. , li j / //l/1�/ /4 / T r.Pc 3 \�r�I �1`(�1 �//fll��I�j�l ' �� B 1 { . �9s ' ► _15'. ' l�� it I pi' (l// �n� / I n n F. ;/ ;r1jYI/ U'1 N 8 { 1, , ' • 4 rs , j1�11 / t / — $Ri T w /i j�l II 111 / 1�ii/ 2 v F -a I• I3a: ; � a ill s ; : .1. '''N . rot.; " - ——IN I, ' 'J i; 0,,,A, 0 r-- .--------_,w Fi \� ui 1' ;' ~ . n / I a • \ ' V V 8 \\ r • Nabr. if !!/ , • \ Y • N t ' -A 4j . 11N i 1 ; • r P•o„ II �, co q Cale D / 1I H 4 . to r - City of Rent? Department of Planning/Building/Public V4 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: L--0D IM c LUth fri a J"COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 21, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM I DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 7r 2000 ..m,a APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Taylor PROJECT TITLE: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project WORK ORDER NO: 78760 DEC 2000 LOCATION: 1500 Houser Way North LGeNuwiwI NEIGH utvtLvr MtN7, I SITE AREA: 770 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A AND STRA BORNOODs^�Inir. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning, Building &Public Works Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project (LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City"Corrosion Control Treatment Facility, and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City"Well 1,2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of.the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals _ Transportation Environmental Health Public Services • Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS +jam)O 67OL-1 t-ti IS ,urS , eo STF19-7Ls:0JC— lPZIvw)11J C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS • We have plication with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or area re additional info is needed to properly assess this proposal. Pl x)/( .6 igna of ifec or or A horized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of::.,,ton Department of Planning/Building/Public•.,orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: eQ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 21, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 7,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Taylor PROJECT TITLE: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project WORK.ORDER NO: 78760 LOCATION: 1500 Houser Way North • SITE AREA: 770 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning, Building&Public Works Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project (LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to,supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City"Corrosion Control Treatment Facility,and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City"Well 1,2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth _ Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet w / ICJ !b 1g/" B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • aAA_ /1A) 4/i-iloce.,(A. .a-4/c _ C. C E-RELATED COMMENTS . hi ,i1<7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention o those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is neede properly assess this proposal. j� /Z Ve Signa re of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of `on Department of Planning/Building/Public works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PUt.h RRu -Lti -R_V- COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 21, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 7,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER:, Steve Taylor PROJECT TITLE: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project WORK ORDER NO: 78760 LOCATION: 1500 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 770 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning, Building &Public Works Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project (LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City"Corrosion Control Treatment Facility,and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City"Well 1,2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health - Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /1/// B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CO E-RELATED COMMENTS A 4- We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 44 '1 /1;0L kL/4/40670 Sig at re of Director or u orized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of on Department of Planning/Building/Publiu vv irks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I IV2 eireuovvhoil COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 21, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 7,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Steve T r PROJECT TITLE: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project WORK ORDER NO: 78760 D ((v I _ [ LOCATION: 1500 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 770 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/ DEC ' 8 2000 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning, Building &Public Work; Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Wa r Well EW€5-rlitEEplawirmit Project (LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump andimipromptcigypport well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3, IIAAAu1.,tIuII of d�IJCiiui,dl feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City"Corrosion Control Treatment Facility,and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City"Well 1,2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare _ - _ - Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation _- _ Environmental Health Public Services - Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation _ Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet -_ k4- B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS - . iv4 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Of We have eviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and ave id ntified areas of probable impact or areas w re additional info tion is needed to properly assess this proposal. ' ate 0 7 ad ign ure of Director or Authoriz epresentative Date IA g Rev.10/93 City of r eii on Department of Planning/Building/Publio vvurks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cb (A.51-vikc,-{-loV1 SCA/1C-3 COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 21, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 7,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Steve TaynEVELOPM CITY OF RENTON ENT SERVICES PROJECT TITLE: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project WORK ORDER NO: 78760 LOCATION: 1500 Houser Way NorthDEC 2000 SITE AREA: 770 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A RECEIVED SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning, Building &Public Works Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project (LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City"Corrosion Control Treatment Facility,and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City"Well 1,2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources _ _ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet M/ve B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • Q; M C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where ditional information is needed to pr perly assess this proposal. /c2(cloe Si ture of 'rector o thorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 -I' DEC 0 81000 City of-Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public vvorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEIN % Q REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: •SDVt0i10-V\ COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 21, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 7,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Taylor PROJECT TITLE: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project WORK ORDER NO: 78760 LOCATION: 1500 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 770 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning, Building&Public Works Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project (LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City"Corrosion Control Treatment Facility, and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City"Well 1,2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health _ Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet NE B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /170/uG C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 61eo./0/v gG7[)UIl J We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. larid /c2/6 ?OTC) Sig t e of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routin Rev.10/93 c -, i°pM ryOR FIB pli/All City of Menton Department of Planning/Building/Public vvorks LEO n�� N NG ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVI 1 Sv MoT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: S Lultkcel icwa COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 21, 2000 vCDD APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 7,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Taylor PROJECT TITLE: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project WORK ORDER NO: 78760 LOCATION: 1500 Houser Way North • • • SITE AREA: 770 sq.ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning, Building&Public Works Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project (LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City"Corrosion Control Treatment Facility,and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City"Well 1,2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use. Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services - Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet A/o/U6- • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS. . . • . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS C/20,yo,(/ Coti7-72-oc, /26.Qui1E66 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. acre �L Cam' 2� SiS re of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routh Rev.10/93 City ofReenn on Department of Planning/Building/Public v✓orks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: PoI,ice, COMMENTS DUE: DECEMBER 21, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM , DATE CIRCULATED: DECEMBER 7,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton PROJECT MANAGER: Steve Taylor PROJECT TITLE: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project WORK ORDER NO: ,78760 LOCATION: 1500 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 770 sq.ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning, Building&Public Works Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project (LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City"Corrosion Control Treatment Facility, and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City"Well 1,2 and 3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet I 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention tp those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a(lditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. C° I� -� Signature of Director or rized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 PROJECT NAME: "' e,pla.4 c..me./1T o f Wc-11 c(A)-3 (. et Gk ;c-c.1 ‘,it) APPLICATION NO: LU F -0 0 - 154, i S i'Y1 The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • 4` .,1• GoC (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) • (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • Applicant Certification • I, TOnv Y 4a.ki)Vry S. , hereby certify that the above list(s)_otad}age property (Print Name) 1 v P c. FER/c/%1% owners and their addresses were obtained from: O SsioN•••,G'5II ❑ Title Company Records ; oNoTq %�: King County Assessors Records :o Rp r • -- N PUBLIC Signed izIrvtetDate df -tnt) eeo‘g4�� 4—���_�_� NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at fR E 4 O&J on the 97 day of J OV E-6113. f2 , 20 (xj . Signed .01.4.A.C• \-bu n --� (Notary Public ,r :::: :»:>:::>::»::>::<»:::.:><:.;::;:.;:.;:;:.;.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;: Y r R 1'Y . Y T Y i. { }y t . k :. :>........ RT .I ATION.Qi.F.MAILING .. .::.: . .. ..... Ait6..'T'.:.::..:..bscrib.ed.and.swor.n.:beforeme.::a Nota.: Public;;in;:and;for•.the:.State of:Washin ton riesidin9 or>the: ) e da o ....................... ... . ............................................. : .:....:::::::::::::::.::::.:.:::::.::: • • • • • • • Iistprop.doc REV 03/00 MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6•20O3 2 r � — • 172305901206 172305901305 172305901404 CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON BENNETT W E BENNETT W E 200 MILL AVE SO 200 MILL AVE SOUTH 200 MILL AVE S RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 172305904309 720006105 CITY OF RENTON STATE OF WASHINGTON 200 MILL AVE S DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RENTON WA 98055 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING OLYMPIA WA 98504 d' �\ 11,` ` A r �J — 11 ' 4. rtY pI V� O'� Development Regulations * 1 I Used For Project Mitigation: SEPA,Title IV • ��Nrr0•S Proposed Mitigation Measures: None Proposed ' NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON- Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Mr.Steve Taylor,Project Manager,Development • Services Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on December 21,2000.If you have questions SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) about this proposal;or wish to be made a party of record end receive additional notification by mat,contact the Project Manager.Anyone who submits written comments will eulomaticaily become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: STEVE TAYLOR(425)430-7219 DATE: December 7,2000 . I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-154,ECF,SM APPLICATION NAME: WELL EW-3 TELEMETRY PROJECT \O O\ O \" „r I I 1 v ,./ • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: On January 19,1999,the City of Renton Planning,Building 8,Public Works O r 1 , °a. . • ' ` Department received a SEPA Determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the \\0.O:: • .•,';+�'_ •` Water Well EW-3 Replacement Project(LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project Includes the construction of a O \ building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project Is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosiOn control .O i. ��L.: . , chemicals from the Citys Corrosion Control Treatment Facility,and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and O ;,o �:p,,.•�• ` LLLJJJ 1� the Citys Wet 1,2 end 3 Building.When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical • 0 VII, ••♦ /n'tfeed conduit and lelemeby conduit would fall within 200 feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline r ♦`'- `\,'t s �• : 13 Substantial Development Permit.With information Net Is now available,tie City has determined that an application for a \ '� ii"Shoreline Substantial Development Pertnil must be completed.This applicetion covers only that portion of work that falls � p. ��p �, � within 200 feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). • OR (S- ����• ice •y • The project includes construction of approximately 10 feet of chemical containment conduit and 100 feet of telemetry ,a- '.... •ti�....se•'. •` conduit within Houser Way North.The chemical containment conduit begins at an existing manhole located approximately •,p �, o I ' 190 feet north of the Cedar River and continues north to Its connection with the proposed well EW-3 building. The :-a�� '+.G a o telemetry conduit begins at the existing Well 1,2,and 3 building.,approximately 115 feet north of the Cedar River and .. I. CCC=��' - 1 continues north to Its connection with the proposed well EW-3 building. The conduits will be burled,which will require _ � �' • ` E �y�,. trench excavation and fill. Restoraton of Houser Way will be completed per City of Renton trench restoration and street • T O overlay requirements.Erosion will be regulated as per City of Renton erosion control regulations. _ �7� PROJECT LOCATION: Approximately 1500 Houser Way North ' , 1 ° ` f • .q��\1. 0 ' OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE,(DNS):As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has h! O t r/ determined that significant environmental Impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed project.Therefore,as permitted h s �•Ir under the RCW 4321C.110,the City of Renton Is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be t A Put'Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated Into a single comment period.There will ?�O . be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of NonSign0icance(DNS).A 14-day appeal „Q,. �`' .. ,, °•ccperiod will follow the Issuance of he DNS. C::::�,;;iI a Ooo- a oc0 PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: November 30,2000 'b\y�A4`y °[' . I " a NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 7,2000 • / } 2 II • PennitslReview Requested: Environmental(SEPA)Review,Shoreline Substantial Development �` `. Permit • - s, 14% 1 .awu-� 1.r Other Permits which may be required: Construction Permit,Temporary Use Permit(for construction staging ' /c O o nr/x .oe ra.0 l \!al •w,y M area) \ 1 /�//' c.4„ro,N Requested Studies: None I\\, AO c�•. '� / �_ Location where application may • A 0 �--r.. _ be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, ���/// - \ v 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: N/A i :. \ 1'4'' ° ' Land Use:• Adjacent properties are a City Park and Railroad and I-0OS right-of-way . � �.'a--- a. 200 400 Environmental Documents that----��_ • ' �• ,���' &b • Evaluate the Proposed Project: None Known ) gtca 10 e a a r/_A?L t ,�d rC 2400 P 1 • NOTICE OF APPLICATION NOTICE OF APPLICATION - -" CERTIFICATION • I, Art,s1-1--c _ DeB,, ") , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . De -7r2,000 Signed: . A n EST: Subcribed an worn before me,a Nortary Public,in and fo the State of_ _ Washington residing ion on the,9I,ek day of • Z_.n o p • '*- s..,.11..e.s ',, , -.tic•-f ' MARILYN K !MCHFFF NOTARY PUBLIC 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON ? COMMISSION EXPIRES • MARILYN KAMCHEFF JUNE 29, 2003 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29 03 • CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM Date: December 7, 2000. To: Tom Malphrus From: Steve Taylor Development Planning Subject: Well EW-3 Telemetry Project Project No. LUA-00-154,ECF,SM The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has received the above-referenced application for environmental review. A presentation of the proposed amendment to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) is scheduled for January 9,2001. Following the ERC meeting, I will send you copies of the ERC determination along with the timeframes for the public comment and appeal periods for your files. • • acceptance `CITY OF.RENTOk':;.;-w��� 'rr E E. �D' E P ER: E .DV S' :�•. LO MEND C S I I lr�EV T S 1/i N- d f` � A�N•D uE�. PEA ..... .. . ...... :U:S RIVIIT� 3 ✓MA5TE APPLICATION CTIeO N r e . 'rPROPERTY"OWNER' S '`( ;PRO P _-[N O . ATP/1.T . F �RM Note: •If fhere is more;than one,legal owneri please attach air::` , add'itional�notarized"MasferApplicatior%for.each'owner., ma , PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: • NAME: G 'Chi 0f Ren-ton R2 Lacc_tM.er•t ,I )e\k W-3 Co n.+04 viekeit-r PlGAY\:( 1 1-5u 1c4;ns j LAb1.zc, W disks Conc3V1- c tk:n ?oo f'-1 of Gejar- Z►►.�( PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ,^ (Q ADDRESS: HOU °-f' too-/ t'4 ) be."l--w�-n C.Jox 1055 S r,ro.oy way �zo-L-•r 4 3ror. dIn w0.y N. CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): ReNTOn 1S055 R Ow TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): '12-S - K30 - 7200 R.0 w APPLICANT:(if other than:owner,), PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: Row COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE`P'LA1N MAP DESIGNATION: �/ ADDRESS: • • PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.MAP DESIGNATION(if applicable): 0 Lk) 'k) CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: ®� Row cco TELEPHONE NUMBER: lfrek OZn� PROPOSED ZONING(if applicable): T?PEuRSON R. (A) NAME: :-: SITE AREA(SQ.FT.OR ACREAGE): • -I. Torh' -7 70 5Q COMPANY(if applicable): • PROJECT VALUE: +y of Renton t 20 o00' ADDRESS: I S 5 (Pro-al cJ0-`/ IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? CITY: ZIP: I Zone. 1- tke- A-PR e'n n ci $055 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE NUMBER and E-MAIL ADDRESS: W`��'n 200 -e:¢c.k o-Q 442-5 - €-I30 - 7 3 13 tke Ge4:90-- Je-f, I , ' 1 • • , ':':,•':':-::: 4.EGAL.bEtviltii#04,0tE_POOPERTY (A.- ...: ,:-. -,`,;_,',_ ,t0011,.4*p4.rate:,•,$ixeot jf ne,.,000Oryy.. .. ,,, :, , , Hou5.--r l.A)c-y N.) r i%Int 0-F- wc...N( ) \Dia.-1-w ex." 1.-k,e: 62;.3.0,..r sikZ.Ve-r 04"0/, ‘'aConsorN Wc-y N ., Check all application iiii01' that apply--City staff will determine feei..,:. ': '.: ,--• ,:: '• l' '.••.. . • . , •_ANNEXATION, , $: ' SUBDIVISION: \ ., '' ,,; 4 ___ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ \. _ _REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ _SHORT PLAT ; $, ,_ . . _ _TEMPORARY PERMIT - ' $ TENTATIVE PLAT ' $ 1 - '_CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _FINAL PLAT $ GRADE& FILL PERMIT , , $ _ (NO. CU. YDS: ) ' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ _VARIANCE $ i (FROM SECTION: ) PRELIMINARY _ WAIVER , . $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT ' $ _ —ROUTINE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ BINDING SITE PLAN , . : $ _ SHORELINE REVIEWS: • , X SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE • $ _ _EXEMPTION $No Charge ___ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $_ _REVISION $ 1 --,;••;- ,...;,;-: ;,,,p,',;:,,, -.1:.:1;'.."--.: '... : .`:', ''--,''''I-::'2•:.- '-';' AFFIDAVIT,O,FOWNPS.HIR , ::,, :: ::'-', . ;,,, ' , -,:.: ,' : ' .. , , 't -:-' .• , :---: . . ...... „.., ,„ _ . - , ...._ „ I,(Print Name)17),A Aic,AplArkiS ,declare that I am(please check one) the owner of the property involved in.this application k the authorized representative to actor the property owner(please attach proof of authorization),and that the foregoing statements.434trelltklooku herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge an,d.tirteff Mriik/.4/ '‘‘ 11,(r.4.•*s..4.6 is;Pt.:._.r.tfi. Qt:......rolliodioi •Z• ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to befOran6c!koirpfRi..i..„,m;an i Tor" 11/10..kp hr.)S ci?• /for the State of /1-f residing Ot „:0. •••-•-•,!; . (Name of Owner/Representative) t R E-14 ,on tit 2/ dayp1jB6G i f 11 0\J• 2012C1.. /, • ;•fi 105:.'• -9-0.N..•*. _F. 9:7Y101 ' I k Aiie.....is ___ (Signature of Owner/ presentative) '01-71/1,1 d._4t. c. , , - - , w,..„Nr. (Signature of Notary Publi w-::', --. -z-, ',---:N',',,::',, :,c,•,,'-'';‘,": .. ''',:.,,,-) '.• — ::' ",',,'":7;, : : , , -,,j; ', 1,' ;'" ' ' '''2„ ,?' (This section tb;be:;coitip,1000 pli:',cAli: Aff)',, :, ,, ki FileN den'fieet:': L;Vki: ;,61 Ob.'...:-; 1 St-113P,:7::-W;:-A46 ,13§:".k,0354$:‘,ItAPU,,, OM' ,00=/k ,CU,H ' PQF,„ I.:, LA_,,,, : ' " ' ."'SA'A''':§A$L,:SiiPtA,'SH131.-i-l'4'SP'::,'SNI` ,;"SiNilg 'TP ',Y-A Y:-P Y-171 !'VY , .::, .,. •4A1-7*:'",t01:0:::!'FP:PP'RY1)41'' ' "7-hz'', , - ' '' ' PROVIDED $: .7totid:',E,E.E :4-,;:w4-2::;'..-,,,.,', 5.::,2,: -::';.V.':'::;:;-'f.,79:12,4,14Pc) TA9i - - ' MASTERAP.DOC ' REVISED 03/00, _ , . . . , . , • 1 . . . 'ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS M• ENTS.;::<:;:>:<::;>:<:::>;::;::;:<:::>;::::;::::;;::>::::«««::::BYE>>'< > <... ... 'Y. ...................................................................................... ............. Calculations, Survey, /brainage Control Plan 2 3121- :. <' ' : Elevations,Architectural 3AND 4 Existing Covenants (Recorded Copy)4 E s Flood Plain Map, if applicable,' ' V Floor-Plans: Geotechnical Report2AND3 Grading Plan, Detailed 2 • ::Indicatin Slte a. • :<.: Kmg Coun.ty;Asse.:. �s M.:.p.:.:::.....:..::.:::.9. :: .:. :;:.. .: .::.::::.:::::.:..:.:::::::::.::.:. : ..:.:::::::::::.::::. .....:.. ::. Landscaping Plan, Conceptual,' U,v e`al:Desc I on List of Surrounding Property Owners 4 Map of Existing Site Conditions 4 Master:A lication.Forma':::> >::::>::>»'" :.:;::::::>:.:>::: : ::>:::>::.;>. ::;: ::::>::::> Monument Cards (one per monument) , Parkin ';Lot Cov...era a:::&::Landsca in Anal:.sis...• • Plan Reductions (PMTs)4 Preapplication Meeting Summary a Rehabilitation Plan a This requirement may be waived by: 1. Property Services Section PROJECT NAME: �ac (,J'3 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE: / (f 24--Of) 4. Development Planning Section „ - h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 'ELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND USE- . APPLICATIONS .....:...........LAN...::U....E:.P�.RMk7.::..:...B.M.:..::..AL::..:.:.....:::...................................................................................:.:...::::.::. . ..:.;.::.;:.:.>:.::.;;:.;:.;::.:.:.:.:::.::: yy...y::;:i:2:':;:::::;:>:2'<::::;:#y.. w�;::Y;;::::t;::::::::;:::::;:;i:;4:;;:;;s:;:::::::q:::;;;::;;::;r,.;%2:::::S:::i::::':':::is:: :5:<'<::::2::ic::i:::i:';:;:• .... ................ .. .. ...... .... . .. Screening Detail 4 Title Report or Plat Certificate 4 .. ......... Traf fic Stud Yz Tree<Cittln Ne etatioriC(.e.:ari .P.an..a::::::.:::.::.:::::..::. .:::. ::::::.. ..:..:..::. .::.:.:..:.................. ........ .. Urban Center Design Overlay District Report 4 Wetlands Delineation Map 4 Wetlands Study 4 .....A:::ticarnfi A deem.en.#:Statem. ..... . : ::<>LeaseAgreementr :r:.::::'2:ANDa....... ... ....:.:.... .. .: . ....::.:.......... :::::.... ....... ....:. . . :.. i�'tn Site.0 .d .• .....2 AND.3...... This requirement may be waived by:1. Property Services Section' PROJECT NAME: Lit-?e,I( 3 2. Public Works Plan Review Section 3. Building Section DATE:- //' 2-8 `C5v 4. Development Planning Section • h:\division.s\develop.ser\dev.plan.ing\waiver.xls REVISED 5/17/00 WATER WELL EW-3 REPLACEMENT PROJECT (Chemical and Telemetry Conduits within 200-feet of the Cedar River) Project Narrative On January 19, 1999,the City of Renton Planning,Building&Public Works Department(City)received a SEPA determination of Non-Significance and an Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Water Well EW-3 Replacement project(LUA-98-185,CU-A,ECF). The EW-3 project includes the construction of a building to house a well pump and equipment to support well operations. Included with the EW-3 project is the construction of a sewer line to serve EW-3,construction of a chemical feed conduit to supply EW-3 with corrosion control chemicals from the City's Corrosion Control Treatment Facility and construction of a telemetry conduit between EW-3 and the City's Well 1,2&3 Building. When the City applied for SEPA,the City was not aware that a portion of the chemical feed conduit and telemetry conduit would fall within 200-feet of the Cedar River and the City did not apply for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. With information that is now available,the City has determined that an application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must be completed. This application covers only that portion of work that falls within 200-feet of the Cedar River(herein referred to as the project). The project includes construction of approximately 10-feet of chemical containment conduit and 100-feet of telemetry conduit within Houser Way N. The chemical containment conduit begins at an existing manhole located approximately 190-feet north of the Cedar River and continues north to its connection with the proposed well EW-3 building. The telemetry conduit begins at the existing Well 1,2,&3 building,approximately 115-feet north of the Cedar River,and continues north to its connection with the proposed well EW-3 building. The chemical conduit is 8-inch PVC pipe. Within the conduit are four 3/4-inch hdpe pipes. One pipe will carry a 3%solution of sodium hydroxide.from the City of Renton's Corrosion Control Treatment Facility (CCTF)to EW-3. The other three pipes are dedicated as spares. If a leak occurs in one of these pipes,it will be contained within the 8-inch conduit and chemical containment vaults connected in line to the 8-inch conduit. The telemetry conduit is 2-inch PVC pipe. Within the conduit will be an electrical cable to transfer telemetry data between the Wells 1,2&3 building and the well EW-3 building. Properties adjacent to the project include Liberty Park to the west and the Burlington Northern railroad right of way to the east. Current and future use of the site is street right of way. The site is flat and drains to catch basins located in Houser Way. The conduits will be buried,which will require trench excavation and fill. Restoration of Houser Way will be completed as per City of Renton trench restoration and street overlay requirements. Erosion will be regulated as per City of Renton erosion control regulations. The project is estimated to cost$20,000. Trees will not be removed during the project. Job shacks or other temporary structures will not be placed in the project area. The water body of concern for this project is the Cedar River. The Cedar River is located 110-feet south of the project area. At this location the Cedar River is contained within steeply rising dirt banks. The banks are approximately 15-feet in height. V•v c �1v' c:files/ew-3/permits/SHRdescr.doc/thm ^...>.. CITY O RENTON • Er vironmental Checklist DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL,CHECKLIST...-- PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),Chapter 43.21 C RCW,requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal(and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal: Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise information known,or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully,to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer,or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations,such as zoning,shoreline,and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered"does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). For nonproject actions(actions involving decisions on policies,plans and programs),the references in the checklist to the words"project,""applicant,"and"property or site" should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: Water Well EW-3 Replacement,Telemetry and Chemical Containment Conduits within 200 feet of the Cedar River 2. Name of Applicant: City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Dept. - Z staff contact:Tom Malphrus 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 1055 S Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 A 425-430-7313 o p4. Date checklist prepared: November 27,2000 r 5. Agency requesting checklist: Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasin , if applicable): Begin Construction March 2000 End Construction April 2000 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion, or further activity related to or connected to this project? X Yes No. If yes,explain. This is a portion of the Well EW-3 Replacement Project which has received a SEPA Determination of Non Significance and an C:\FILES\EW-3\PERMITS\chcklstshr.doc Environmental Checklist Administrative Conditional Use Permit. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None known 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? Yes X No. If yes,explain. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Building and Public Works Permits,Department of Health Project Approval 11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The project includes the construction of approximately 10 feet of 8-inch chemical containment conduit and 100 feet of 2 inch telemetry conduit within 200 feet of the Cedar River. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project,including a street address,if any,and section,township,and range if know. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description,site plan,vicinity map,and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The site is located in the NW quadrant of section 17,township 23 N,Range 5 E. The project is within the Houser Way N,right of way. The project is located approximately 115 feet north of the Cedar River. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site: X flat El rolling hilly steep slopes ❑ mountainous El other b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope?) 0.05% c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay, san,gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The project site is paved. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. No d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,describe. No e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. None 2 C_\FILES\E W-3\PERMITS\chckistshr.doc Environmental Checklist f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so, generally describe. No g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example,asphalt or buildings)? 100% h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Appropriate erosion control measures as by City of Renton construction specifications. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,automobile,odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction equipment exhaust during construction. Upon completion of the project none. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal?❑ Yes X No. If so,generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if any: None 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? X Yes❑ No. If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. The Cedar River is located approximately 115 feet from the project area. The Cedar River flows into Lake Washington. 2) Will the project require any work over, in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? X Yes No. If yes,please describe and attach available plans. Project description and site plan are attached. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if known. No 3 C:\FILES\EW-3WERMITS\chcklstshr.doc Environmental Checklist 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain?Ei Yes X No. If so,note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?Yes X No. If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known.No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served(if applicable),or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so,describe. Run off from the project area will flow into catch basins located on Houser Way and discharged into the Cedar River. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so,generally describe. Sediment created during construction could enter the Cedar River. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,ground,and runoff water impacts, if any: Contractor will be required to comply with all applicable erosion control regulations. 4. PLANTS a. Check types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree:alder,maple,aspen,other ▪evergreen tree:fir,cedar,pine,other shrubs ❑grass pasture crop or grain ❑wet soil plants:cattail,buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage,other • water plants:water lily,eel grass,milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Chinook Salmon may spawn in the Cedar River. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: The site is paved right of way. No landscaping is required. 4 C:\FILES\EW-3\PERMITS\chcklstshr.doc Environmental Checklist 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds:hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other_Crows,Seagulls,songbirds Mammals: deer,bear,elk,beaver,other Fish: bass,salmon,trout,herring, shellfish,other Salmon and trout in the Cedar River. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Chinook Salmon in the Cedar River. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas,oil,wood stove,solar)will be used to meet the completed projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing, etc. Not applicable. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: None 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards,including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion, spill,or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. The chemical containment conduit will contain 4 chemical lines. One line will carry a 3% solution of sodium hydroxide. The other three lines are spares. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. The city fire department and water maintenance crew will respond to emergencies. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The project will comply with Fire Department requirements. The chemical containment conduit is connected to chemical containment vaults which will contain chemical spills. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:traffic, equipment,operation,other)? None 5 C:\FILES\EW-3\PERMITS\cheklstshr.doc Environmental Checklist 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example: traffic,construction,operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction there will be construction noise from 8:30 AM to'3:00 PM,Monday- Friday. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is a road(Houser Way N). The adjacent property is City park. b. Has the site been used for agriculture?❑ Yes X No. If yes,describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. Asphalt concrete roadway. d. Will any structures be demolished? Yes X No.If so,what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Right of Way f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Right of Way g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an"environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. The site is in Zone 1 of the Aquifer Protection Area. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle,or low- income housing. None 6 C:\FILES\EW-3\PERMITS\chcklstshr.doc Environmental Checklist b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,middle,or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: None 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. The project is sub grade. Nothing will be located above Houser Way N. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The project is sub grade. Nothing will be located above Houser Way N. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: None. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?None. What time of day would it mainly occur?N/A b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect,your proposal?None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any:None 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? City park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? ❑ Yes X No. If so,describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological, scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. 7 C:\FILES\EW-3\PERMITS\chcklstshr.doc Environmental Checklist c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. , Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site will be from Houser Way North. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? N/A c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so,generally describe(indicate whether public or private? No e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water,rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection,health care,schools,other)? If so,generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water,refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,other. Water,electricity.and storm drains. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service,and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. None C. SIGNATURE I,the undersigned,state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is 8 C:\FILES\EW-3\PERMITS\chcklstshr.doc Environmental Checklist understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Q<31 Proponent: Name Printed:Tom Malphrus Date:November 27,2000 9 C:\FILES\EW-3\PERMITS\chcklstshr.doc WATER WELL EW-3 REPLACEMENT PROJECT (Chemical and Telemetry Conduits within 200-feet of the Cedar River) Construction Mitigation Description The project is scheduled for construction March 1,2001 to April 30, 2001. The hours of operation are 8:30 AM to 3:00 PM. (As specified in the construction specifications for the project.) Transportation to and from the site will be on Houser Way N. The project will comply with City of Renton construction standards and regulations for the control of dust,mud, erosion,noise and other noxious characteristics. Sediment will not be allowed to enter the Cedar River. (As specified in the construction specifications for the project.) No more than one traffic lane will be closed to traffic on Houser Way N.,at any given time. (As specified in the construction specifications for the project.) c:files/ew-3/permits/SHRmitig.doc/thm Li �? 1 S" • INTERFUND TRANSFER Transfer Number: Date: V: 6 C r7-7 General Description: Department To Be Charged (Transfer Out-From) rnr'I' ?6P0 d .• Description Account Number WO/Function Amount SEPA isHoizaLTHE REViVIA/ L+zsoccconosft 596000A46So55,`t, 54'00/MVO irZS b o 65 • �4 _J !td/`Department Authorization: PA V�", �, �,. DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF F+:=N COIN NOV 3n2 O • --� Departmen k''o4f{Be ll ere'di ted (Transfer In - To) 1 1',,w,k)'_ -- ' \'J _.a Description Account Number WO/Function Amount } Distribution: White: Finance Department Yellow: Department to be Charged Pink: Department to be Credited **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 11/30/00 08 :49 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R0006687 Amount : 1, 251 . 65 11/30/00 08 : 17 Payment Method: IOT Notation: INTERFUND TRANS Init : JEJ Project # : LUA00-154 Type : LUA Land Use Actions Location: HOUSER WAY NORTH, BETWEEN CEDAR RIVER AND BRON Total Fees : 1, 251 . 65 This Payment 1, 251 . 65 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 251 . 65 Balance : . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 250 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0016 Shoreline Subst Dev 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 1 . 65 • DEVELOPMENT PLACITv NNING oN NOV3f ? DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON NOV 3 n MOO