The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA77-025 R Affidavit of Pubkc tfior 2 \ o, iL NOTICE OF STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 PUBLIC HEARING COUNTY OF KING s .� i, ;- RENTON't AND USE irl;uR 1 u .i• : i HEARING EXAMINER. ' RENTON,WASHINGTON• .a �; A PUBLIC HEARING �� (��' WILL BE HELD BY THE ;:;kI.t•1;y••ViG1'•r••iB 4 ingfirstdulys}q�*'n RENTON LAND USE � c��` HEARING EXAMINER AT LNG pr.P P/ HIS REGULAR MEETING oath,deposes and says that.6.11e.is the ...oh is f of IN THE COUNCIL RE- THECHAM- RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) • BERS, CITY HALL,times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and MARCH 22, 1977,AT ON has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred A.M. M. TO C CONSIDER R 9:0E to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- FOLLOWING NG PETITIONS:T THE paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, FOLLOWING and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained 1. APPLICATION FOR at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton FOUR LOT SHORT PLAT Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the APPROVAL;'File No. 023- Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, 77; of N.E.loeatedinvicini- ty of N.E. 21st St. and Harrington PI. N.E:• Washington.That the annexed is a Notice of Public 2. WAIVER OF OFF- • SITE IMPROVEMENTS �;e x ri¢ FOR FOUR LOT SHORT PLAT; file No. W-024-77; Property located In vicinity of as it was published in regular issues(and N.E.21st St.and Harrington not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period , PI.N.E. 3. APPLICATION FOR • PRELIMINARY.P AP- PB0 i e No. PP-02 of o.ne consecutive issues,commencing on the e ruPet tbcatedon of N.E..10th St. bet- ween 1.1•t la day of del a•r-o.l: ,19....77..,and ending the Olympia Ave.N.E.N.E.and 4.. APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT AP- i• PROVAL; File No. PP-026-. day of ,19 both dates 77;property located on west inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- side of 138th Ave. S.E. scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee (Duval) between N.E. 20th St.and N.E.24th St. . charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ 7. which 5.SPECIALPERMITTO has been paid in full at the rate ofG CONSTRUCT A CHURCH first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for the FACILITY IN A�G (SINGLE per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent ( TGLE insertion. FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE, File No.SP-003-77; • property located just north of Honeydew Elementary. School On the east side of Union Ave. N.E. • • � aQ/ Legal descriptions of all ..... .... applications noted above on Subscribed and sworn to before me this file in the Renton Planning -1 }1 day of , Department. ALLTO INTERESAIDSTED PE M a r c h, , 19 7; SONS PETITIONSR- ARE INVITED TO BE PRE- ' ^ SENT AT THE PUBLIC _;/• / la HEARING ON MARCH 22, Notary Public in d for the State of Washing n 1977 AT 9:00 A.M.TO EX- residing at Kent, King Co ty. PRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y.ERICKSEN RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June Published in The Renton 9th, 1955. Record-Chronicle March 11, 1977.R4235 . —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, •- adopted by the newspapers of the State. / 2 g loG • GSS 77 �R�TaGCG �p - SgO r, th) March 4, 1977 ti ' P";- Zr-i �11A-VA :-tea Renton City Council o '4" Municipal Building � Cif R`�S 10, 200 Mill Ave. S. �` CL� ;� Renton, Wa 98055 � ebGcZ2L� Gentlemen: On behalf of our client, MacPhersons, Inc. , we would like to request an exemption for lot 9 of ,Farrell`l'S Frs't Addition (preliminary plat PP-025-77) , to allow the use of a pipe stem configuration. Due to the awkward shape of the portion of this plat fronting on Duval' .Ave. , a pipe stem lot is necessary to allow a lot of adequate width and depth to be placed in this area. A 20 ft. access easement is planned to cross a pipe stem portion of lot 9 to provide access to lot 10, thus pre- venting lot 10 from having to access directly on Duval Ave. We feel that this combined access, rather than two individual driveways fronting on Duval Ave. , provides a safer and more attractive design. We appreciate your consideration on this matter. Sincerely, (OF TRIAD ASSOCIATES, INC. G�IIJ�D /o lir4. f eoz MAR 7 /977 Scott W. =igbie \\-16 // �� SWB/mef iNG DEP��'��• cc: James L. Magstadt, Renton Hearing Examiner • 846- 108TH AVENUE N.E. • BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 • PHONE (206) 454-0711 , • 'i.O... ,....;.;0...„. .. " -•••• •8.0' 0..•7'7''''S,Nurs.,. -- --4. ,.., • • .: • r•.,: , , . . ..:' • • ' 0•0=F:r4.!........_,_„ ammmm. *. : 7";•4: - ....A.-:. -.iisrPlY4-f--%...3-.- .. i I5 \ &ASS . • , -.V! ,. -- S'1-7) ft lak 1046 ' • ',,,5.,;-• a illcovol: .1,LviatIN.92.004 .stSIPI .... ••.:t . .,..4 - • 77 ,.._ Su i30.x... _ -•- •.,_____ _ _0.' ..g.- . . . 0 000tIlk% FA.' ' Sso..‘02,1 • .. . Renton City Council Municipal Building . 200 Mill Ave. Renton, Wa 98055 • Renton City Council 4/18/77 Page 3 Correspondence and Current Business - Continued Lake Washington proposed by Mr. Zehm.not be included in the Phase II of the Lake' Marina —Cont. Washington Beach Park Master Plan in accordance with the report of the Comprehensive Planning Committee and further concurred in the concept as proposed in the master plan that moorage facilities at the park be limited to day moorage for small craft only. The letter noted appreciation by the Planning Commission committee for opportunity to meet with members of the Park Board, Park Director and City's con- sultants in reviewing Mr. Zehm' s request, as well as the long range development of a park that, as stated by the committee chairman, is one of Renton's most significant assets. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS PRESENTED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR. CARRIED. Fee Schedule Letter from Planning Director Ericksen recommended revision of the Industrial City's industrial platting fee and explained request for review by Subdivisions the Burlington Northern Railroad because of estimated permit fee to carry proposed valley industrial park from a tentative state through (Removed from final stages would amount to $40,000. The letter explained when Consent Agenda) the fee was established, intent was to cover costs to the city and allow for contingencies; that due to large tract of land involved, Burlington Northern's fee would exceed normal estimated City costs by $25,000 to $30,000. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL REFER REVISION OF INDUSTRIAL PLATTING FEE SCHEDULE TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. MacPherson's Inc. Letter from Hearing Examiner Magstadt recommended approval of prelimi- Preliminary Plat nary plan for MacPherson's Inc. , Farrell 's 1st Addition, located PP-026-77 approximately 200 ft. south of NE 23rd St. on the west side of Duval Farrell 's 1st Addn Ave. NE, proposing 18-lot single family residence subdivision. The Examiner's letter noted appeal period has expired, MacPherson's Inc. request having been heard 3/22/77; and further noted that according (Removed from to the action of the Council , approving, modifying, or rejecting the Consent Agenda) decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless within 20 dalendar days within the date of action, an aggrieved party obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for purpose of review of the action taken. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY THORPE ITEM BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE WITH REQUEST THAT EACH COUNCILMAN RECEIVE PACKET OF INFORMATION FROM THE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED. MacPherson's Inc. Letter from the Hearing Examiner recommended approval subject to Ruddell ' s 2nd Addn conditions of request by MacPherson's Inc. for preliminary Plat, PP-025-77 Ruddell 's 2nd Addition, located Northeast corner of Monroe NE and Preliminary Plat NE 10th St. , proposed 14-lot subdivision. The letter noted public hearing 3/22/77, appeal period having now expired and further listed (Removed from 20 day appeal period to Superior Court. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED Consent Agenda) BY THORPE, REFER TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE'. WITH REQUEST THAT EACH COUNCIL MEMBER-' RECEIVE PACKET OF INFORMATION FROM THE HEARING EXAMINER. CARRIED. Referendum 29 Letter from State Department of Social and Health, Services Referendum Funds 29 Coordinator, J. P.' Orrico, replied to Mayor Delaurenti 's inquiries Senior Center re funds to assist in construction of a senior citizens center. The letter in reply to the Mayor's question about timing, noted the Regional Citizens Advisory Committee allocated the fund to the City based on belief that the project would be through the application process and under construction in 1977; clarifying that the funds are allocated to the City for the senior center by the Regional Committee, but the actual grant request has not been approved, and part of the approval process involves estimate of when the project will enter; the construction phase. That if the facility is not going to be under construction for three years, it is highly unlikely the Committee would sign off on the application or carry it forward into 1978. The letter noted the Area Agency on Aging prioritized another senior center higher than Renton's . That one of reasons to split the funds, in addition to need, there were 'indications the Renton project was ready to begin in 1977. Noting, information such as contained in the 3/30 local newspaper article dimishes City's chance of keeping present allocation and reduces opportunity for additional funds available in DSHS Region 4. The letter further stated assurance is required that funds are actually approved from other sources; that to ensure the facility will progress even if other funds which were approved at the time of Referendum 29 grant award, fail to become available, require- Renton City Council 4/18/77 Page 4 Correspondence and Current Business - Continued Referendum 29 ments are that project must be under contract with DSHS within one year Funds - Continued from date of approval , that if construction contract is not signed during 12 months allowed, funds revert to other projects; noting inflation decreasing value of Referendum 29 funds. MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL REFER THE LETTER TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Administrative Assistant Custer discussed City's portion of $117,500 Referendum 29 funds split with. Greenwood by Region, #4, or $58,000. Councilman Clymer noted two directions being taken by Council and Administration and asked for better communication. Councilwoman Thorpe requested copy of application be furnished Council members, being in agreement with Admisistrative Assistant Custer, Frank Cenkovich, 2625 Benson Rd,S. , Senior Citizens Advisory Committee', inquired re delay , asking that no funds be lost, OLD BUSINESS Committee of the whole report submitted by Council President Perry Committee of Whole recommending Council approval of the Master Plan of the Lake Washington Meeting 4/12/77 Beach Park. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED B.Y SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN Park Plan RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Wetlands The Committee of the Whole recommended that the Mayor be requested to prepare a report for the next Committee of the Whole meeting indicating the status of financing and acquisition of wetlands, includ- ing the status of the 39 acres set aside by Burlington Northern, MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Wetlands The Committee of the Whole recommended that the Administration pursue all avenues of funding, including contacting our local legislators for recommendations of sources for funds to acquire the additional 39 acres set aside by Burlington. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND RESOLUTION BE PREPARED THAT MAYOR CONTACT OUR LEGISLATORS TO RESEARCH AND REPORT BACK. AMENDMENT BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, MATTER OF RESOLUTION BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO PRESENT TO COUNCIL NEXT MONDAY. Recess and MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS FOR 10 MINUTES ' Executive Session Council recessed at 9:35 p.m. and upon convening, Roll was called: PresentPERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, GRANT AND CLYMER. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BY GRANT, COUNCIL EXCUSE COUNCILWOMAN SHINPOCH (LEFT MEETING) . CARRIED. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. Asked to attend: City Attorney Shellan, Jolly Baker, Plan- ning Director Ericksen. CARRIED. Time: 9:52 p.m. Council reconvened at 10:30 p.m. Roll Call : PERRY, THORPE, STREDICKE, GRANT, CLYMER. ORDINANCES & MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE RESOLUTIONS TO ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. CARRIED. Ordinance #3126 Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report if Comprehensive Plan recommending second and final readings for an ordinance amending the Ripley Lane N. & Comprehensive Plan regarding Misty Cove area (Lake Washington); first Misty Cove reading 4/11/77. Following readingsof the ordinance 'amending City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Ripley Lane N. , it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL:, ALL AYES. CARRIED. McLaughlin Rezone The Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final R-001-77 readings of an ordinance regarding the McLaughlin Rezone from R-2 to Ordinance Held . Business District containing various covenants which have, been One Week approved by the property owner and the City Clerk instructed to record same with the King County Records. Following readings, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Attorney William Reseburg, 710 4th & Pike Bldg. , Seattle, explained he had been contacted by Leslie Adams and others who had filed appeal of the McLaughlin Rezone (R-001-77) , who had indicated dissatisfaction that full hearing was not held two weeks ago. City Attorney Shellan reviewed provisions of the Hearing Examiner ordinance wherein there is no requirement for public hearing unless a substantial error committed by Land Use Hearing Examiner; Shellan reviewed appeal hearing when new evidence was called for, that Council found no gross error;. also reviewing hearings before the Examiner, noting three hearings have been held; noting additional restrictions added. Mr. Reseburg was furnished copy of the proposed ordinance. Reseburq requested reopening; of the procedure so that both sides could be presented. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, SUBSTITUTE.MOTION, COUNCIL REFER REZONE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO HOLD FOR ONE WEEK, I " PPTFn • C4. 41C? of (1 ®It-77 4 iv �1 — z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 . CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR s LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER o JAMES L AVS'PggACI* . 235 - 2 593 " tp SE P-Wv 43 q. 9 . �. �� April 13 , 1977 h 0 TO: Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Jim Magstadt, Hearing Examiner .ice ( 9 SUBJECT: MacPherson' s , Inc. Ruddell' s 2nd Addition, No. PP-025-77 , Request. for Preliminary Plat Approval The appeal period has now expired for preliminary plat approval request for MacPherson' s , Inc. Ruddell ' s 2nd Addition, File No. PP-025-77 , which was heard on March 22 , 1977 . Since the request for reconsideration or appeal has not been officially made, I am therefore requesting that r rum . According to the action of the Council, approving, modifying, or rejecting the decision of the Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless. within 20 calendar days within the date of action, an aggrieved party or person obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for King County, for purpose of review of the action taken. %--,)/%7 Jim Mag, adt • g Hearing/Examiner JM:mg , April 18, 1977 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: MacPherson' s Inc. - FILE NO. PP-025-77 Ruddell' s 2nd Addition LOCATION: Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N.E. and N.E. 10th Street SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval of a proposed 14-lot subdivision. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to RECOMMENDATION: conditions. Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 15 , 1977. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report , examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject preliminary plat on March 22 , 1977. APPEAL PERIOD: The appeal period for this request expired on April 5 , 1977 , and is subsequently being submitted to the City Council for final approval. If you require additional information on this matter, please contact the office of the Land Use Hearing Examiner. 4/744/ ames L.,. agstadt Hearing xaminer / Atta en • • A. •. '!,. ..MIt�5 ' toe•r ,•�•..�r •'' " 4 / kit! 1` 1� ;Qy! _' I , _': •n :'; L.. Log; •-• r '. ' _ III : LI:M...•. N, • i ,, r....„___ . ... .: . an • tiim‘ .--- t R-3 . aR-3 •i . + 3 1. A.wile° . ,.. ,, r .s Mb.mos.111 ,0‘:\40.1r4: .. , • G- 00 Jy r ' 3 i 1. -.1 t ,tl V° . • • • ./ • -•4 11 JO"'-L--1LZZ 1 ".1r , r Aolor ..!c,, ,,,da,-.4t:.„. . y •'{,' I t!yy; I el ex I,. ; +- ..I.' ..'t.11• ¢J L1f •'ti.•.1" G. L_1Sc•1 ;!--7-il. " • ....r.--7,:.;•: ,7...Z.?, ..1 ,..„. - •- 1. tor e •••, . 1.4:1 i•::::::1'. '-.1). .r,e . . I},-- •.: 5. ;% • ., • ; ..�! ,I U WSJ .:.41'-1.1.:z/1• . ,, 1•�,4��,�A�� m_ 1..I. " n' 1/ 1 j.. +.-• -1.i :1• ,.�•tf•:.77,•.1.• •l'fT :1. • ,- 4!• . 0 _ ,i I till L-LL.1 11 .7 1''. e 1 ; - j T.i 7,, sirr 11-'-r . .5;.,y.••. ,i!.c.%ii.:A:1 I PRELIMINARY PLAT: . MacPHERSON'S, INC. ; RUDDELL'S. 2ND ADDITION; Appl . . No. PP-025-77; • Application for Preliminary Plat Approval ; property located at N. . 10th Street and Monroe Ave. U.E. APPLICANT MacPherson's. Inc_ TOTAL AREA 1 3.2 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 10th Street • EXISTING ZONING GS-1 Single .Family Residential . EXISTING USE ' Vacant land PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential • . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Resjslential COMMENTS • • EXHIBIT #1 r ill 4 Ate ' g El ® 0 a i a rt., I NL. Itofl4] 0 cr] c� D a Gb 'W�le• a Q cD ES r o o 8 123c, 0 Q • Kt IoTM Pt.. I 11-3 d CI a cj r3 1:3 titi ,Q' . � II 1 Qnt� 1 ' ZC] ® o . Iii Z�• LJ �e �O KCOSul •-- o > D o Lt \k)14 . Q m r•: r','•fi: ALE? O DM � : fi. ! .. vt.• iwL 1 ® +rn • 0 a NC• j� *f,. . , � •� p o 1®67 "®" ® ro p 0 0 0 aIE -r 0 ozC I 0000p D. ]n ODDa d 1 > N.6. �N It, a[ pCoo ®000El q a ppp g0 p a 0 Q d 0 I ° Q p 0. 0 CI a ® I ❑ ❑ t <TO 13 • , gD o 0 o iML i"-;,,, *1pJECr On" En Mai. d�4 f#N'S. ram. . PRELIMINARY PLAT NO PP-025-77 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: G. M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE: FROM: Del Mead, City Clerk RE: Hearing Examiner Decisions - File No. We forward herewith Land Use Hearing Examiner's file for preparation of proper ordinance. Please return to this office for further processing and presentation to the Legislation Committee. ) . . . „ • .•• • " THE- CITY OF RENTON • • . •• • • • •:.:-MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 7") ilk EP • • • .• '• • • • • :CHARLESIDELAURENTI , mAyoR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER • o JAMES L. MAGSTADT , 235 - 2593 • • ED.strce • :.• • • . . • _ . • April : 13, 1977 • • • ' • TO: DelMead, City Clerk • FROM: . H4M. Magstadt, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: MadpherSOn ' s ,':Jnb. Ruddell ' s 2nd Addition , • X . No. pP-.7:0,25-.77.,. Request for. Preliminary Plat • Approval • • • _ . . . . . • • The appeal period has, now expired for preliminary plat approval request :for-,10.6Pherson' ? , Inc. Ruddell ' s 2nd • Addition, • Fileao, .PP27.-025-77 , which was heard on March 22 , • 1977 . Since •thereqest . for ' reconsideration or appeal has • not been officially:made, T am therefore requesting that you trapsmit: thirelitinarY pl t 'to the City Attorney for the_preparation;,Of _ ee o be placed on the • Coupcil! s .next agenda. for fiTet rea /70 /Ord. 1,76364c, / .027(zi/ 6721 l'i-;,a)9/443- . According to the action of the Council, approvi,ng, . modifying, or rejecting the decisiop of the Examiner • shall be final ahO:cpn011asive unless within 20 calendar days - withinthe date of action, an aggrieved party or • person • obtains . a .-writ:of. certiorari from the Superior - Court of Washingtenfor King County, for purpose of review of theHactiOn?Itaken. • . . Jim Magstadt . . Hearing/Examiner • JM:mg ' • . _ „.. • • • •, • „ . . . , • . • • • • • . • • . . • • • • • • • Y• ri, K+ ,.r.•{.t�. : �„'. , .,'....: fs,, `r ;., .. *S. ;�`>irr- Apr it f ,z,.,v 3 t - , OFFICEJy:OF THE �At'ID` USE HEARING' EXAMINER . , '- : CITY OF RENTON. R PORT' ND ' ECCO �:.,EN,. E A . RC M D'' `M AT�I`ON��TO'�THE'�'��ENTON` CITY:' .000N'CI L. `.y :A .P P h • �•T`'•- ICAN - ':Ni `P'` •ac ie` ;so'i ' s Inc= Inc'': •FILE.• N PiP'r 25 r 0', 0 7 7. udd'"la' a' ;2'' Addition 'LOCATIONc •' ° '� ,�_ -:'r'. J�;North`e�a'st� :•c'•orner •'of Monroe .Avenue N.:E. 'and--' N; :E' °10tM:'.-Street • SUMMARY' F:> • O ,4R ' f • preliminary.. lat `a Proyal' , ,E `qA 'T' carit''°re.4:nets' P . ` P , , 1of subdivision. , a�= ro 'o . -, -,tv:C" SOMMARY .OF `P1anri' rig: Department Approval subject Ito' C M•ME DATIONa'� conditions. ,He :r ; a '�E- ain' n r • • A xi: r a l . s b x ov u 'ect"�to" Ir • is•^A '.`r,,t : • conditions: . � <y r! :r P LANN N `D P: "T I G� E T NT`r:� lie';:p;1; ; '::r ` AR ME aii �, :De• a tment' sfaf• f re ort`' `as.'rece`ived. :' . ,: REP ,4, '�,.,.;��$e'f ant n ;o Mareh. 15;.;;�.19,'7:'� Ai .. ";, 'r.r-:o r • F<; - e7 t<f . y< hl t e. 'nt'dr: e 'or r' t'i ' ' yA, t `="r a � :t ` n 'n De armr .tP L'h :.HEARIN , ,fS ' •,; ri 'a w ai`able: '.informa:t on: on. f e'' Y .' h eamn � ` iec ii� :the:� r`o ert �and':a' '`l• at on ` and f� e d: :checking - . ' Y. c: . : , i-k.?;suundri ' <area` >the..Examiner• condu'ltea : ubli .,' ,.: . ,. - , ; „h•e•Jaix3 9 : n'/ t ,.S t . .r. l.�minarY' P aton , �; a .. -, l ��,.!-�i '9!" ':5•:'i, �"j'�' ..Marc4'` '' ." s '....I'''•:...':::•;..-:,-...'.; '........;:.. • • APPEAL, PERIIOD "+The a ipe:al, period. -for•-this +r`equest.`expired on••, • pr 1 5, 77<;. •and- is subsequently be;4.rig , submitted :•.to='the..'C t Council for....f.ina-1 approval. _ „ rt�i j�'. + -l- if?'�' - . .If y q t oria .zrifoi`�ii��at'a�on:;'ori-:this;matter. lease-- contact ' p the..''off �c' i e, '.of':•�t� e ,,,h. ;<`;T;ar%d,,;U�se`:;He,arn: Examiner - - -i I""::'S it ' - - // Z4 Oames L. agstad£;j : , Hearing.:Examiner ;rr H•A l 15 ' Attachment` - F . - , '.. .. , • .•• . . '' 'mmimArmems . . a • • •• .;; ''.; '4: . , : H--., ,4 ir'ik.cr.T . • :II.'" • ,• ,;1. .= - .' .. '•:• . ..:" •- . .;:t •• .. ., • i,r,t1..f..,.....,:-.:-. - ..-: .: :.:-,-.• -• - . • ' - , . , . ... ,.. . r.... ...... _ ,,--2. • • ,..- Tv, ___ .... - $ • •,;•,-••,•;::-.-,;-. .• • - - p•-• • _ 7 . ,'. .-.41.: : '? .-.")`.\-' --''' ', . • G-7200 : - 4e.- . • . , . ----1 .-' :. ',',! • 1:•,iii.!• ... ' •-•;, • . v . q: •.G-'—'1, 1 k: 1"."•-'-'"-- .. .•"; % '° : • r. .- •••• •• ' , • , ,•,. • \ •• '1 •••;'''•• •' • .., ' • .:'•1( . r,,,,ri,r.,,:;..1 • i• ,..Li:. ,4; .....,. R.i. ..i.i.-i4.0 - • . • L-; ,• F.- . ' '.!•• •• . . . ''.4./"'I'''(").' .. : -i....t• .....; -:':.: •• ' .• ' ei • 17+1;6]....ii•I , -• - ' •::,t . ,. . , „. .. ' ' • • • t-L',,"--2-' . .. I • LOS:, :•: . l' .61-11!Rs. ' ''",; -. i .. ' ••'D ' I i • .1 I 4:6 g•,. (,•,;,--' ••!...- --- ,' .- ler SS 1• I. . . ' • ' . • ' ! G ---• • i • .R173 , , ..- ,,n • l' - ••• : .. •• 1 'I:. ..,•• :1. PI . • ......- / ..-. . . . R.3- 7 .1'.;"" 14 ir•-•-- -'7:- . - / '• r''. - • . ' • . 1 . . ' .1' 4-vii- --.' - RI,: :.-- •' - - .,...,.., ...! .. . .. . .. -- • . . _,-.•.; .„,„,.., „,., , .. • . h. i _ G-7;00 .441 -..;..• n ,• - et,-:. -: v..ifiiit_i' R.-. 3 • • - ' - .At• •". ''N'T ' --' R-3 , • ;iv :,,, ,.-44,.. :. ii., • ,. iy, . :.-! . .. ...6.:':.:1_,, :.!.;;': .---m•-•': . G S. ....t,',..::,... •,... . ••••••••••_. ,- :"." rf, R.. IA , ,••• „1. ....• 1..4., ,...,. :....., „ •' C ,;;.: :•tiiii-12 t] ;:1:•:•,ME ,. •, .,..•.i.,,,,' _it?s ; ,.., •,..1 ik . • . -8...1 , . s , • ' ''r — -13- . . ' --, . :. :'..Fr.v--: .., .. •-)1,,-.;:': . ,,,,:.: : 2-i.:_.. . ,, - .., 1,4 .,:,,... .Z.711,1.1,1..... .1fia;-:•:.,:-' -. t • -.' . t '. .• 4%; ....; ''. l' .: ; 11." :. • 2 '•rid: . • ..-iiri'lkl ; ...• ,.- .14:P'-1,:,j . . . ''-'1'1'• - ,. •I ' - .. ; /-4 - '-:- • ;'T-• ' - ----- "'••• : • Itilitt" rts--.'• -.-. .' 7,::t' ;'1 ili'• 0. itta6_ , .•; .i 1110 A 74_.; r%, - . i ..1 '':14. .. •i Ir • ,,, • t 1:t t.'81.1 1! l'T, 1- ft4,_ _...e.'.':',:,.,- : . .:---0 -'7' .#0.1-A:4:2:x.:7:.,',-. Prz.'... -.."..., 1 . . •ry,'.'. •-•:::',-;—A '" . :'IL.— .'.,_ ,i 7' • t•'411 ,i'. ''. . •" lir:.,4''' ..''••••-::'.., ,'.••..-":•It•el 1 •4-"':h.•••-f. :•-"'.1._-j.2 1 . '•• -:•`"44.".1.1.. i 7.,..1 *..1 . 10• • '' ..... ilio . ::•.• ,. ...1 ''l r....?..,...;. • ,, ....:;:"....),r,. . :;',;;nf•,-,'•42;,:7411:•!•r•-:- ::A" ' ''' HA, • :111:.. . i.;.; ':1 , ‘,.,'i....: .•• •!..i-,c,r"...., 1 :in •- _,, „.... - i,..,- . .1:. , ....1 . . r. .. ,....1: . . .. , _ ,• . r.1..!-I..,,:.- i: i i:ti.i! . - .. " ' ,- ,:,..,.„4,:•.,..1- 4.1 /:' I - , - ' ''' • • ' • I • ' f r.,•.;:!•1:'=.:. ..! ,. . ' K-1 • - L"2,:•A. •'.i.' 4...--I .'i• • ii ?.i, 7,: . ::i:: :11 . : - •C: '.1,,''''''.'hi. ---;:o? ';'.: ;'.. • FL,- 'I.- •I ........- ts-*..ii'' -:,-i,. \ ). .., 1 7A.• -:•;•.•..., ..........:.7•77--.. . .• ...1-t•:..,: i .47,..„-tly..,,; ; ..1,.. ,..• 1 I . ;. - - ,..rs -.- -...,--,-....,.;.,• - ; . , . . , , RA .. ..ii:....,.„..-L, : ;, .wr,,,j,i,ffr, •• .: ?..,r7 /•.7,1 , . --.: . • :‘,,....) . _. ,„,,,1.1..k. ..s4 ! L.t_I -•_- ....::. ,:i cl..:-...::.i 4444-Z,..'"t* -r:-:' • Cer-N -4-.14-kg14. 4 '.• • t•I'\.. ' ''..jii:1 • /- ? ' ..! '1 --1 . 5,':‘, . 4 1:: .041..1= .%,'",\- :, .• • t•. - I, -...A.\id;1.i • . 'trt.ft •.,•• . Ad20 ".• Sir- ---Al ' ' ' . , _...;;:,). : I L.:', 1(k)f- 1 . • . . .' • PRELIMINARY PLAT:. • • .- . .. . • . . . . . ... . . . MacPHERSON'S, 'INC. ; RUDOELL''S 2ND..ADDIT ION; Appl . No. - PP-025-77; A-Fir) ication• for-Preliminary -Plat Approval.; property located at N.E. 10,th 'Street and. Monroe Ave. kJ.. . . . ' .. . . , . • .. . . . . .: . . . .. . • . . . . . APPLICANT MacPhersowc,S. rnr_ • TOTAL AREA I 3.2 Acres . . . , PRINCIPAL. ACCESS N..E. '10th Street ' . . • EXIS1ING• ZONING. '..•GS”:1 Single Family •Ressdenttai • • . . •: • EXISTING USE . - Vacant land :. • . . PROPOSED USE. .- -Single' Family Residential . . . • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Restilential • . . . • ,COMMENTS . • • . , • . , . . • . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. • , ' . . . . . . .......:::.....j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • EXHIBIT #1 . . , ... ® D 00 El Da y 0 0 ® a 0 ® .� 'TN ' AVvi4WA1O ;: f ` a It d t2) r?' 0 0 E] 0 tfr ii N ( a7 a ate . 1a :ff. ;:i• :41,::;0:, ai ‘IN 0 0 1 0 ,71 • 0 4% I f n(J ti.ti.. p.•1f. • -.: ,,..,,,: -- ..5,,,,,?;,..,::::.;.. tim 0 EI a .A ..._..... )::3 40 U10 a* q rr}r••$'r•••rrt •r.};::r.: 1,;•fs•+}}.a}••:;:}. X lry a Z 0 et 0 C 1 C I iii. 1$1 7 EMESteli a 1 ° 0 a 0 idr 113 '-STi '3AV _� lip 11.1M fel p ITS — 0 1;.To CP a L'*41:131t****41r-i ii cla allu in C3 CD ci co tm Cin Ei Cm2? c3 pc') 0 . --,..,:z....!.....cp � � Q .� .g/►Y G40MNNi('t ca cOQCD0 pi g G� c: Q ci ® cIc.3®tom e7I=Jr: _�. ® 4 ®C� Of __,n, „ „,„„ ® Q a L�ck ifilr.11-. 1- �' -end C:I0 C❑ e'_1 o p ®C� �d�x�n March 29 , 7 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL° APPLICANT: MacPherson' s, Inc. - FILE NO. PP-025-77 Ruddell ' s 2nd Addition LOCATION: Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N.E. and N.E. 10th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval of a proposed 14-lot subdivision. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to RECOMMENDATION: conditions. Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received REPORT: by the Examiner on March 15 , 1977 . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on March 22 , 1977 , at 10 : 00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibit into the record: Exhibit #2 : Plat Map Designating Street Layout and Lot Layout. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to clarify the notation on the plat map regarding the buffer areas, and inquired if the requirement would be enforced by restrictive covenants. Mr. Smith read the notation into the record which referred to a 15 foot natural buffer easement to be preserved in its natural state, all trees to be retained, no driveways or other vehicular access to be permitted to cross said buffer easement except for Lots 1 and 14 , and additional landscaping or planting to be permitted within said buffer area. Mr. Smith indicated that the notation would be recorded with the plat. The Examiner questioned the requirement for restrictive covenants. Mr. Smith reported that he expected no difficulty in the procedure as recorded on the plat map. The Examiner inquired about the recommendation to require an easement between Lots 1 and 14 to provide access onto 10th Avenue N.E. M . Smith indicated that Lots 1 and 14 were specified because they were corner lots, contained no significant vegetation, and allowed access and flexibility in the plan. . t PP-025-77 Page Two The Examiner inquired about the average lot size in the plat. Mr. Smith reported that the lots vary in size from 7200 to 10 ,000 square feet, and the average lot size was from 7500 to 8000 square feet. The Examiner asked Mr. Bigbie, representative for the applicant, if he. concurred in the staff report„ Mr. Bigbie indicated his concurrence. The Examiner asked Mr. Bigbie if he would have objections to the notation on the plat map being placed in the form of restrictive covenants. Mr. Bigbie 'indicated he had no objection, and reported that the same notation would be placed on the final plat, map in the form of covenants. The Examiner asked for additional comments. Since there were none , the hearing on Item #PP-025-77 was closed by the Examiner at 10 : 10 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: '1. Mr. Scott Bigbie stated that he was representing the applicant, had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and has concurred with the Planning Department' s recommendations. 2. There was no written correspondence from opposing parties nor was there opposition to this request present in the audience. The purpose of the request is to review a preliminary plat consisting of 14 single family residential lots. 3. All City of Renton departments have been contacted and have made their specific comments. 4. Size of the property is approximately 3 . 2 acres and has access from Monroe Avenue N.E. and N.E. 10th Street. 5 . The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this property as single family residential. The subject property has undergone a number of proposed uses dating back to April, 1967 . The last proposed use was the construction of, a church facility on the site. However, this proposal was strongly opposed by the neighbors in the area and was eventually denied by the City Council on December 15 , '1975. 6 . The westerly half of the property consists of significant stands of Douglas Fir together with intermittent dogwood and thick evergreen underbrush. The eastern half of the site has been previously cleared and consists of grasses , brush, and scrub ' deciduous trees. The area surrounding the site on the east, west and south is basically single family residential with the Bethlehem Lutheran Church situated directly to the north. 7 . All water and sewer lines are available adjacent to the property. 8 . The City of Renton Planning Department, pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 as amended by R.C.W. 43. 21.c., has issued a 'Declaration of Non-Significance for the subject proposal. This is based on the fact that the city through various approvals has worked with the applicant to preserve as much significant trees on the site as possible. The lot sizes and division of property would be compatible with the surrounding area. ' 9. The City of Renton Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues , findings of fact, applicable policies and provisions, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and , this report itself , being uncontested, is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as is set forth in full herein. PP-025-77 Page Three CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed subdivision is in compliance with the subdivision codes, the R-1 zone requirements, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and policy statements. 2. The applicant has proposed to screen the subdivision by providing a 15 foot natural buffer easement along the west, north and south property lines. This buffer would be a very effective screen from adjacent properties and would provide the new residents in this subdivision with a sense of privacy. RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval subject to the Planning Department' s recommendations. ORDERED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 . es L. gstadt and Us earing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Scott W. Bigbie TRANSMITTED THIS 29th day of March, 1977 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Ordinance No. 3.071, Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before April 5 , 1977. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. SECEINED OW OF RE TON • PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR '971 AM 8 PF� PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER Fei8ogotOo��1i211121e3141.5;6 PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 22 , 1977EXHIBIT NO. / 'ITEM NO 6J-2Y-77 APPLICANT: MacPHERSON ' S, INCORPORATED - RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION FILE NO : PP-025-77 , PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval of a proposed 14- lot subdivision . B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record: HIGHLANDS CHURCH OF CHRIST 2. Applicant : MacPherson ' s , Inc . 3. Location : Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N . E . and N. E . 10th Street. 4. Legal Description : Lots 6 , 7 , 8, 9 and 10 of Mapes ' 1st Addition , as recorded in Volume 60 , Page 7 , together with the west 1/2 of the north 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 9 , Township 23 , Range 5 , less east 30 feet, less west 30 feet, and less the south 30 feet together with the street vacated by Ord . #2883 . 5 . Size of Property: Approximately 3. 2 acres . 6 . Access : The subject property fronts both Monroe Avenue N . E. and N . E . 10th St . 7 . Existing Zone : R- 1 , Single Family Residence 8. Existing Zoning GS-1 , General Classification District ; in Area : R- 1 , Residence Single Family; and P-1 , Public Use. 9 . Comprehensive Land Single Family Residential Use Plan : 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C, PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow construction of 14 single family residences as per the proposed plat layout. D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The easterly one-third of the subject site was part of Mapes ' 1st Addition filed in 1960 . A rezone request to the P. 1 classifica- tion for construction of a Masonic Temple and medical/dental facility on the subject site was denied by the Planning Commis- sion on April 26 , 1967 . That portion of Newport Ave . N . E . extend- ing into the site from N.E. 10th St . was vacated i,n 1974, thereby eliminating access to the previously platted portion of the PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 22 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION (MacPHERSON ' S , INC. ) property (easterly one-third of site) . A special permit to con- struct a church facility on the subject site was denied by the City Council on December 15 , 1975 . A rezone from GS-1,. to R- 1 was approved by the City Council on March 7 , 1977. E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The westerly half of the subject site is relatively level . The easterly half gently slopes upward to the easterly property line (approximately 6% slope) . The overall slope of the site is approximately 5%. 2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material , 6% to 15% slopes (AMC ) . Runoff is medium; erosion hazard is moderate to severe ; and permeability is very slow below a depth of 24" to 40" . This soil is suitable for urban development. 3. Vegetation : The westerly half and along the north property line consists of significant stands of Douglas Fir, together with intermittent dogwood and thick evergreen underbrush . The easterly half of the site has been previously cleared and .consists primarily of grasses , brush , and scrub decidu- ous trees . The existing stands of evergreen trees are primarily 6" - 18" caliper and provide a destinctive character to the site. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals native to the area . 5. Water : Surface water or streams are not apparent on the subject site . 6. Land Use : A single family residence previously existed on the site. It has been demolished and the site remains undeveloped . The area surrounding the site on the east , west, and south is single family residential . The Bethlehem Lutheran Church exists directly to the north , with the Seventh Day Adventist Church located across Monroe Ave . N . E. and approximately 100 feet north of the subject site.. F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Land use and zoning in the area is primarily single family resi - dential . However, several churches exist within one-fourth mile of the site . Refer to Section E . 6. and Exhibits 1 and 2 for more detailed land use information . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer: A 10" water main exists along Monroe Ave . N. E . and a 4" water main exists along N. E. 10th St. . There are existing 8" sewer and storm sewer mains located along Monroe Ave . N . E . . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirement. Any future subdivision and development of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route No. 42 provides service along N . E . 10th St . directly adjacent to the subject property . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 22, 1977 PAGE THREE RE : RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION , (MacPHERSON ' S , INC . ) H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . ' 4-706 , R-1 , Residence Single Family • - I , APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS : 1 . City of Renton Subdivision Regulations . 2 . Land Use Report , 1965 , page 11 , Residential . 3 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , D. , Subdivision of Land, pages 5 and 6 . J . IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : Some existing trees and vegetation on the site will be removed and storm water runoff increased , as the result of the subject proposal . K, SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request will have minimal direct social impacts . It will , however, affirm the use of the site for single family residence purposes . This will tend to stabilize the uncertain situation pertaining to this site that has existed for many years . L, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended ( RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the sub- ject proposal (see attached) . This is based on the fact that the City, through various approvals , can work with the appli - cant to preserve as much significant trees on the site as possible . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A site map and vicinity map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department 0, DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1 . The proposed plat is compatible with the existing single family residential development in the surrounding area , the subdivision regulations , the R-1 zone requirements , and the Comprehensive Land Us.e Plan and Policy Statement . 2. The applicant has provided a15 foot natural buffer easement along the west , north , and south property lines as required at the time the property was rezoned. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 22 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION , (MacPHERSON ' S , INC . ) 3 . The rezone of the subject property to R-1 single family resi - dence was approved by the City Council and will soon be finalized . 4 . Every attempt should be made to save as many existing signi - ficant trees as possible . 5 . Utilities are available to the subject site . P, PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION.: Approval of the preliminary plat as proposed subject to : 1 . Retention of as many existing trees as possible to be included in the overall development plan . Evergreen trees shall be removed only upon approval from the Renton Planning Department . The site development plan for each lot shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to approval of a building permit . 2 . Provision of natural buffer areas around the perimeter of the site as proposed . 3 . Provision of improvements along Monroe Avenue + N . E . and N . E . 10th St . as per the subdivision regulations . II • II` L , �. .'''6 iL�` •ITF♦-.y ••.px4,.•9. 1•".f.0�. `ox t ,. r •ii..•'A• -I — 4.-.1A Rs' , F.... •k • . a F ' • A •-=_ .IE',.,1- -N s f/.o t1.r...�*,dn}r. ,,..)2 • amy -fT. • • .cil ... r....____ . ‘ ., 0 11:1 . 41. ' _.A.:1 4.`,.4 1,. "" i • /17? . . 141 i, /OS 3 :T:I: ° �•,• •1 a �• , � I G G •C .•w,fT • , % • I I it W � j v` � 1 -,r- t•m ,l _ • 11 x i i,• i . . .% ' i 1 J xSl.. is g1 . a,• • —.- - ,- `� - • 1 i. _... . . . . r,„„ a •t .p�., zle • 209' , //f•, i�, i t�i+, -sr•n-1.%o R3e • r�s� LAW 1 I,. 1.....„,..,. .,. 4: ...:_4, . 1 Em G ',1 .... • I ' 1 . 1 R-1 : :o 1 , .. ., „ fejt . "- niL NE 12�• is, G-, Ol' �I r, 1 ;T f . r Pr y 1. r,l 7y c . ,. , 1 4 t 4� -3 1 I I R-3 I e,•JII .i, : I . S , o :li•-R• v'pti ' l -- _-. •� a0 r" i 'f f, 91., • cE, o.,,. .1, a t " / N.> . . .44. . . .. — :\_ a1'• �'. '�W f •1• Z !-• ' _ • bN j9 �,,.' ye • .• N I1 S. .. --• a .;Q�7,Q �-'>,�+%1.: OM I I \'I x PP, ' •, 'I>3' ,. /g••IS u �, ' �TM �' , ,. ;x. o`�` eIl Y -sa s;Ir• •(s • • PliiCarwe' at:•---i . . . .. litAk i '0,, of/ ..• , gi, . ..'. ifii : i ••• i ": r, "•i Ng illibb— ,•.• ,. ' ''c''.7- 7 7. s'.4riT., r! : rr 37 -t,C•l. ot/_5 ,„, E ' .. .". $. v: 9,��r11_f.�+,-to'. x '_,: ,1 !• 10ti r 1 \ v �• xx Y i �•-17 -s, t 7 1; j.I•pal„ln l,fll•Inlvb• '. T N!, l0 gT.46. .., 1f�: II, 1.1.�..1 i.:1_1.1.. .. _ a ;T % I• ,; .; r,,; ate,.., , .11 i. f7 1 •1---'171-. !'I� '1r •�`• iet4•y n 53. 3z 0,, 't"if..,,. '.i 1'llll'x— 1'l'r11i� .1.Y. 1{ '••_. .'l•�aL!I I T N M• T� ,•`r`• .��1'�.� _ _ rl. = 1• t� IL'."IHJ . �_II_•1. .'�- �•'A1 � rr,' I • • taffl - ... ., ..k, . , ....,....X. .., . i 7., 1 ..;1. • ( p... i;1,, tl—', •.4. . ,.• , .•. • • 'R-I r. 1,1. .. ' .,.., 1 ' • . .•, t.. o I ° f� • o•• I p n •o,. 1 1" : —+ 'L•1:' • •� •1�I1rt ,t•• ��1 f Ai " '.. 1' l 'LA_1.:_i.:_LL 4 u7 , , 1-;i • .0•,-- s• 1 .l .-�- { 1 1 2 4• xr IIIMr • 4 • I i 1,.`7a l ILi z•-i•-, IT- A s ••�• •�- a •• ••'"'./.J.'f Via.. 6�c� .\ x • y:. ly} . . PRELIMINARY PLAT: • • . MacPHERSON ' S;' INC. ; RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION ; Appl .. . No. PP-025-77 ; • Application for Preliminary Plat Approval ; property located at - • . N. E. 10th Street and Monroe Ave, N . E. . APPLICANT MacPherson ' s . Inr . TOTAL AREA } 3 . 2 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N . E . 10th Street EXISTING ZONING GS-1 Single Family Residential EXISTING USE Vacant land PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential COMMENTS - - • :: 'EXHIBLT #1 11-23Lij i7J- a ED ic=11=5 . . • ___,, R4•7•• E? a '''' '4 v * B D 1•4-1 con c:3 r:=3 ""e .. ram. 114" Ili its c:3 C cl (3 13 1:::11 two**4 ' CI 0 6.1 N•� ion"- el,. TE Do 8 °,.�ri �a s.F zT n❑ �„J ? a ,og _ _- o .�' ri a ' r�Hb0H15M __=___ ® a 0® ❑ A�Rw+ 4 ,. +. LMurt . ui Na t"' 2 i 1.41,141 "". .....x.:•:•::::::iii:iii ,e---- N.E.;"*.o .... R U • 2 -\-- tok.::i:::::*:.::::::::.:.:.::::::::::::*::::„:„.s ....„....:....::::::::.::2::::.:i 0„Ei a. z‘ 0 Di Aari.74,01 )34 o 3 . D ..: 0. r3 z u (324 i z -.., iiiii:g::::::::miii:iiiiiiiiiiiii:.iii:::§iii: :**:::::::.:::::::::.:::::::::, Ea 0 ui ri 135 - 1 .,-- ii::.;iiiiiiiiiiiimiiiiiiii:iiiim.::::::: itAi i:iiiiiiii::iiiI:ili§ii:1 _ z,-, T...5 z p 0 13:3 f al -3 :::•;:i:iiii:iiiii:iiiiii:iiiiiiIiiii:iiii.:iiiiii:iii. e -:iiiiii:iiiiiiiiiiiEiiiiii n it -s 40 l Illateilaii:::1 4:i•i::*:•;•-;:i iof:::::::::..... . 0 04 II C:1 Ea3 le uy ET] 13 , `"t.-'1 1;1 coY ® U E1oODOEJo0 &1 ® ❑ P Un ® N.6. NzCS 6 >*4 0 0 ° 0o ® � ® DD � ®C3 o CI CI c-j DI a a° ®CSQ p t3 ► a DQ 1 010 0 n❑DUUD D p oa El C23 0 C:1 13 '' 13 rtjuirtirio 1:3 0 i \.1 C:1 , 53 0 0 1 DQ i2, N.6, em fr.... ...____ El LII 0 0 . . i Di E4.,m.* I 4 Sutm6cr $rt° calm. MA"“ R ON'S rNL. PRELIMINARY PLAT J NO. PP-025-77 PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/lid-SIGNIFICANCE Application No . PP-025-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-204-77 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal 14-lot single family residential subdivision Proponent MacPherson ' s , Inc . Location of Proposal northeast corner of Monroe Ave. N. E. & N . E. 10th St . Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to Q have x❑ not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS ❑ is Ellis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with, the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : • Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen • Title Planni i cto Date March 15, 1977 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 u '},z 76-135 :, ,CITY, OF RENTON , PLAT APPLICATION c _y,_ SHORT PLAT .� O � 'V FILE : 7; ; •% DATE " i 7 , 1, TENTATIVE FEB. 28 1977 FEE $115C• a-m . X PRELIMINARY RECEIPT NO. //'1.6' 7 FINAL 9 ADZ SM NO. tip �- DEPP� PUD No. APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : 1. . Plat Name & Location • Ruddell ' s 2nd Addition (N. side of NE 10th St. between Monroe Ave. NE and Olympic Ave. , NE 2 . , No. Lots 14 Total Acreage 3. 2 Zoning Rezone. to R-1'. 3. Owner Highland Church of Christ Phone Address P.O. Box 2433, Renton, Wa 98055 , - 4. Engineer Triad Associates, Inc. Phone 454-0711 • Address 846-108th Ave. NE, Bellevue, Wa 98004 . 5. ,. Underground Utilities : Yes No Not . Installed . . Telephone . X Electric X Street Lights X - : Natural Gas X TV Cable X • ` 6. Sanitation & Water: ' . 57 City Water (� Sanitary Sewers • /7 Water District No /7 Dry Sewers /7 Septic Tanks 7. Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance .. ,• 8. DATE REFERRED TO : ENGINEERING -. PARKS • BUILDING HEALTH ' TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY ' FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS • OTHER 9.. ' STAFF ACTION .-. SHORT, PLAT APPROVED DENIED TENTATIVE PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED ' 10. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PRELIMINARY PLAT - APPROVED i' . DENIED ' FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED ' .• 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: " PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED • FINAL PLAT. APPEALED EXPIRED ' 12 ; DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS: DATE. DATE BOND .NO. & TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT I Planning Dept 76-135 AFFIDAVIT I ,Les Porter (for Highland Church of Christ) being duly sworn, declare that I represent the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this day of a,,e7, , „,.., , 19 2 ‘ Notary Public in and for thee State of Washington, residing at (Name of NotaryPu�) ( nature of Owner gnature s G 6 SE l3?-" c6/4- e osEdx Address) Address) (City) (State) 00Jcele(one}o Z� (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to .be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Co R Date Received 19 Z7 By: -,,,- !/ S e �.� 1 I !J l lgl� "r �v Renton Planning Dept . 76-135 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM R1 `,��, 7:61)0Ntb JAN 11 1911 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY ` �r/.p�M.__, Application No. Go7- 77 c9./, 7e.ii4/�i'✓ e C/K.� \,p` "..1-L . 44.1 Environmental Checklist No. '�Lt -�f / ��' �N/� PROPOSED, date: FINAL , date: • ® Declaration of Significance ®Declaration of Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971,, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I .. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent MacPherson' s, Inc. 2 . Address and phone number of Proponent: 12733 Lake City Way, NE Seattle, WA 98125 364-9650 3. Date Checklist submitted 11 January 1977 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable : Ruddell ' s 2nd Addition • 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal . (including but not limited to its size, general design elements , and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : • The proposal consiSs of the development of 14 single family residential lots on approximately 3 . 2 acres of vacant land. • -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : The project site is located in an area of medium- to high- density single-family residential development. The level site is partially wooded with fir, hemlock, and alder. Ground cover on the west half cons. ,s of salal, ferns, scotchbroom, etc. ; on the east half, primarily grass and alder scrub. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : August, 1977 9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone (GS.l to R.l) , subdivision approval, and normal permits required of single-family subdivisions. 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain : NO 11 . Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property• covered by your proposal ? If yes , explain: NO 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) ( 1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? -X_ YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil ? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X TES— MAYBE N-6— (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , X either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? YES MAYBE N Explanation: (b & c) Minor grading for streets and building sites may result in some moving of soil or minimal changes • in topography. • -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in : (a) Air emissions or .deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE RIF (b) The creation of objectionable odors? X YES MAYBE W (c) Alteration of air movement , moisture or temperature, _ or any change in climate , either locally or • regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of X water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? }}�� YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE N0 (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection , or through the seepage of leachate , phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria , or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation : (b1._ onstr11ction._of__strPets, driveways, dwPlltxlrgs and other impervious surfaces will reduce absorption rates to some extent.- --Starm-draindge fac 1ttt i accommodate any additional runoff created. _ (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora ( including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? X YET- MAYBE WO— (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing ' species? X YES- MAYBE NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X E— MAYBE NO Explanation: (a & c) Trees and groundcover will be removed _ within street R.O.W. ' s and on building pads : Landscaping of—d-i—v-id-ual lots may-add to both the-dIv____t _„d -1 quantity of on-site species. -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , • X insects or microfauna) . YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YET MAYBE NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: No noise above levels existing in the surround_ i ng_naighhnrhnorl shnu1 d he generated. (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or X glare? YES MAYBE TO-- Explanation: No light or glare above the levels of existing street lighting should be produced. (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The current and planned land use trends in the area are for single-family development. (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in : (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X YES MAYBE NO Ex lanation: ( 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an expTosion or the release of hazardous substances (including , but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MBE NO Explanation: ( 11 ) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution , density; or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposed density will be similar to existing • adjacent development. • • -5- • ( 12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposed development will add 14 new dwelling units to the existing housing stock. _ ( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in : (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? • AS MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities , or demand for new parking? X • YES MAYBE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X_ TES-- MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne., rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Approximately 105 one—way vehicle trips per day (24 hrs. ) will be added by the proposed project. The existing street sysLerrr-sir- Lai -a.r�d eau dclugadLely—aceoIruuoddLe this modest increase without changing circulation patterns or adversely impacting the system. ( 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : (a) Fire protection? X YES M YBE NO (b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? YES MAYBE ?1O Explanation : Increases in existing fac.f_it-iesnr not be necessary due to the size _ansi_scal.a of t-h __roposed project. (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in : (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? y,_ YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? g YES MAYBE Nny- Explanation: • (16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems , or alterations to the following utilities : • (a) Power or natural gas? X YES MAYBE NO .(b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X _ YES MAYBE NO r -6- ' (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE U0 (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: The proposal will require new on-site utility lines and connections to existing mains. No other utilities improvements should be required. ( 17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? YES MAYBE NU Explanation: ( 18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive • site open to public view? X • YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ( 19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? IL_ YESMAYBE NO Explanation: (see B. 14) (20) ArcheoluicalJllistorical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signiTant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? X_ YESMAYBE NO Explanation : • 11I . SIGIIATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful c f. full dkisclosure on my part. Agent for Proponent : }/��`—__ (sr-Tiled, • Scott W. Bigbie • —(name printed) Triad Associates, Inc. City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 22 , 1977 APPLICANT: MacPHERSON ' S, INCORPORATED - RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION FILE NO : PP-025-77 , PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL A, SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval of a proposed 14-lot subdivision . B, GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner of Record : HIGHLANDS CHURCH OF CHRIST 2. Applicant: MacPherson ' s , Inc . 3. Location : Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N . E . and N . E. 10th Street. 4. Legal Description : Lots 6 , 7 , 8, 9 and 10 of Mapes ' 1st Addition , as recorded in Volume 60 , Page 7 , together with the west 1/2 of the north 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 9, Township 23 , Range 5 , less east 30 feet, less west 30 feet, and less the south 30 feet together with the street vacated by Ord . #2883 . 5 . Size of Property: Approximately 3. 2 acres . 6 . Access : The subject property fronts both Monroe Avenue N . E. and N . E . 10th St . 7 . Existing Zone : R- 1 , Single Family Residence 8. Existing Zoning GS- 1 , General Classification District ; in Area : R- 1 , Residence Single Family ; and P- 1 , Public Use. 9 . Comprehensive Land Single Family Residential Use Plan : 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date. Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST: To allow construction of 14 single family residences as per the proposed plat layout. D, HISTORY/BACKGROUND: The easterly one-third of the subject site was part of Mapes ' 1st Addition filed in 1960. A rezone request to the P- 1 classifica- tion for construction of a Masonic Temple and medical/dental facility on the subject site was denied by the Planning Commis- sion on April 26 , 1967. That portion of Newport Ave . N . E. extend- ing into the site from N . E. 10th St . was vacated in 1974 , thereby eliminating access to the previously platted portion of the PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 22 , 1977 PAGE TWO RE : RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION (MacPHERSON ' S , INC . ) property (easterly one-third of site) . A special permit to con- struct a church facility on the subject site was denied by the City Council on December 15 , 1975 . A rezone from GS-1 to R- 1 was approved by the City Council on March 7 , 1977 . E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND: 1 . Topography : The westerly half of the subject site is relatively level . The easterly half gently slopes upward to the easterly property line (approximately 6% slope ) . The overall slope of the site is approximately 5%. 2. Soils : Arents , Alderwood material , 6% to 15% slopes (AMC ) . Runoff is medium; erosion hazard is moderate to severe ; and permeability is very slow below a depth of 24" to 40" . This soil is suitable for urban development. 3 . Vegetation : The westerly half and along the north property line consists of significant stands of Douglas Fir, together with intermittent dogwood and thick evergreen underbrush . The easterly half of the site has been previously cleared and consists primarily of grasses , brush , and scrub decidu- ous trees : The existing stands of evergreen trees are primarily 6" - 18" caliper and provide a destinctive character to the site. 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals native to the area . 5. Water : Surface water or streams are not apparent on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : A single family residence previously existed on the site. It has been demolished and the site remains undeveloped. The area surrounding the site on the east , west, and south is single family residential . The Bethlehem Lutheran Church exists directly to the north , with the Seventh Day Adventist Church located across Monroe Ave . N . E. and approximately 100 feet north of the subject site . F. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS: Land use and zoning in the area is primarily single family resi - dential . However, several churches exist within one-fourth mile of the site. Refer to Section E . 6 . and Exhibits 1 and 2 for more detailed land use information . G. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1 . Water and Sewer : A 10" water main exists along Monroe Ave . N . E. and a 4" water main exists along N . E. 10th St. There are existing 8" sewer and storm sewer mains located along Monroe Ave . N . E. 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per ordinance requirement. Any future subdivision and development of the site will be subject to the City of Renton standards . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route No. 42 provides service along N . E . 10th St . directly adjacent to the subject property . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 22 , 1977 PAGE THREE RE : RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION , (MacPHERSON ' S , INC . ) H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE: 1 . 4-706., R-1 , Residence Single Family I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . City of Renton Subdivision Regulations . 2 . Land Use Report, 1965 , page 11 , Residential . 3 . Policy Statement , Comprehensive Plan , Renton Urban Area , D. , Subdivision of Land , pages 5 and 6 . J. IMPACTS ON NATURAL SYSTEMS : Some existing trees and vegetation on the site will be removed and storm water runoff increased , as the result of the subject proposal . K. SOCIAL IMPACTS: The subject request will have minimal direct social impacts . It will , however, affirm the use of the site for single family residence purposes . This will tend to stabilize the uncertain situation pertaining to this site that has existed for many years . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended (RCW 43 . 216 ) , a Declaration of Non-significance has been issued for the sub- ject proposal (see attached ) . This is based on the fact that the City, through various approvals , can work with the appli - cant to preserve as much significant trees on the site as possible . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A site map and vicinity map are attached . N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED: 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5. City of Renton Fire Department • 0, DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The proposed plat is compatible with the existing single family residential development in the surrounding area , the subdivision regulations , the R-1 zone requirements , and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Policy Statement . 2. The applicant has provided a 15 foot natural buffer easement along the west , north , and south property lines as required at the time the property was rezoned . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 22 , 1977 PAGE FOUR RE : RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION , (MacPHERSON ' S , INC . ) 3 . The rezone of the subject� property to R-1 single family resi - dence was approved by the City Council and will soon be finalized . 4 . Every attempt should be made to save as many existing signi - ficant trees as possible . 5 . Utilities are available to the subject site . P. PLANNING DEPARTMENT RECOMMLNDAT I O".1: Approval of the preliminary plat as proposed subject to : 1 . Retention of as many existing trees as possible to be included in the overall development plan . Evergreen trees shall be removed only upon approval from the Renton Planning Department . The site development plan for each lot shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to approval of a building permit . 2 . Provision of natural buffer areas around the perimeter of the site as proposed . 3 . Provision of improvements along Monroe Avenue N . E . and N . E . 10th St . as per the subdivision regulations . . I • • • I H. ii; • • I•s•I_ G_7200 l ,l .-Ij . . ' • I a t riP f, i' , 1,,T,1,.',4 ,1N„.'... ' • •,- , 14 \.: :el • , / / , .,- , • . :4 ,,1Ly N Y f F J t• •O rl • • 216 209 _ ', ti`• ►� j..!.,,)•1111711, . . �! j ,1 1 •L_Til'..;r1-.7::1‘.."., dJ' •11• • 1Ma�� i .H.- — . I . I."I '.47‘". .• 1 ... R-13 G - M L - ' ..4 R-3 ' sf , MI M• a �? pp gI > tis 1 �, 4t '1 1 sg. ,,, , ,I , ,t R 3 M, " to' 1 • . . .- ' p • .4 . . . ;,, / 0-1-2•R-2 �s //�� .�� N E 2T 5T i.,, n , ,. ,/I, 7,17 45 -. A.3-01 .1 R-3 ....' ----t0 S. - 1C---,'•-•-;')- ( . • • I I r 41 4. • 1 ... If., .1:41:9f. . ig /410 • C rPµ OP•� •� •viii L� •146lr •I �� j ,E r:L,ti v`;•, L:= ± 'y •r .. 2 , ,•••,,1,-i -. _ ; , •r., j9 q 1, .- `.,''1 d Z.r� i ;1,,L rw • n 11FLf • �' � j \: ..•• e •- i It.' %/ ;•• , T " �4.' I ._1'• "1�''1':�d t. W ,+�'.. Z� a ,�_ i•t• r �A7 715) ( `'l . 1 i U;i " ti e...„ ,,,..1 1. ....!, .._,_;i2i:,_,....,,., . ...„ , . ,i, ... ,,c„:: .1:.i:::, rooraop ,,•j.n Vaal. .. - •. .� 10 r 6T. ' _ J f��.rr�yT•iir1.•�•1 { of * ..� . • 4is _ ::, H5 .101 :X.".:, f I•1.I'1•T. .T:, �'••t�,, ! rc77f .91$.4f'.... . ' 1 53 i . . d . ' I...." I 11-1 iL-11.2:r.l.iii •• • • r-11 Fr'' 1T. ___ '` /• - , �' -'I1 a. 1Dr f.:.l � • > 'JW ..{M • a• I •.-.•+..y,N 2 4..''. �C � hil id ' .1JJJ11-' •r•-i..d.` 1 • a Z • �',,, » •.'i• 4• •/u 4 i 1. ;. • O n • • >"':..' /ids �J •• Lfl , . l ' , N � R I J .v � imi _ri • . ', I-1 1•L' • .1•!!1'�,ii41r••''-1•{!.••i' ,''.}:o ' ;,'• g . &�!! iib..� ,ram },��'''. �" � � =.:1'..t:_-t�t11_1` ..i.. a. E � =-L'�.•�� ,..N •1 1.1 l.,a � . - tivq. , ..i (� I rtha • S a ' ••'`. •„� ' ..'1 •"-4 ..{ r1 1 I. 1 T '.`..'1d'.a ., ,•NE'.Me ..,J /,� ."'�•7•�� n„•a , 1 , r 2 �r V ,• V- ', 1 I '_ ,• a ;e l'. 03 . . i• iil.\'• 7 ' '1 Z. •t 14 1 -T'�4y,. .. • •p• •-.%,rm. •.. I u i M • 1 ^ a• ' 4r , ! . . •is r . . ./. 1 , ' 1.t' ' , 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT: MacPHERSON ' S, INC. ; RUDDELL ' S 2ND ADDITION ; Appl . No.: PP-025-77 ; Application for Preliminary Plat Approval ; property located at N . E. 10th Street and Monroe Ave. N. E. • APPLICANT MacPherson ' s , Inc. TOTAL AREA } 3 . 2 Acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS N . E. 10th Street • EXISTING ZONING GS-1 Single Family Residential EXISTING USE Vacant land • PROPOSED USE Single Family Residential ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Single Family Residential COMMENTS:,' - EXHIBIT #1 . +.-- _ g4.3. Q ® � N ti6. I 1� ` r frii, • _ _ _ ID a, cto.I L]L] 0 C] r. ... „ O in 11? 5� C� ,,,,► co � C� C7 ® Qd ® a 6 .1 ,.., ill. tyr v.,- 1 ❑ D9DI Q ot �► Milri ' a In [ s.F z 14 ❑ r ❑ /6 EA . LI a _ _--.Firo Z p�fM1WiNIfM __•: iff,%Li 13 a , ai p '""""'' I 1a1 1.4a'WM' N.E.--;;; ,,,,,.....? . LNu1tGN III g°9 rj pv� 115 � ‘1' �Nr � . 0 Eil 1:1 r aO - :irtv::irittlii_iip.:::„...:: //:zriam . -iz i 1 131,_ MiciPill d W a jj 3 wi • 2 or iiaD os r oQ A0 T.-s • I �,`u NS. ig C ea ay S'2 GI '&11' Y416 0611:0 IR IS rE4 1:311§ o Q 3 U ({13 T-. „ p ® ® 0 C7 C]b‘ a ii 4 -• ® CJ C] ® Zp El N.6. f/" 11. . Ell LI COCCS °n 2'16 0 0 0 0 E3 C:3 E:3 ° 1:31:3 El ® ❑ G 0 [2' 0 CI a Drt, 1D . LJEl D 0 GI p Q p ❑ ; CAoS3 ❑ ❑ CI El Q p (3 o n 13 CI ° &t,iftt,6 i„r z®®' 4i, 4u6.1l;tt 3rtt= . MAL p 4 R I" siJi.. . j PRELIMINARY PLAT NO. PP-025-77 • PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON—SIGNIFICANCE Application No . PP-025-77 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . ECF-204-77 OX FINAL Declaration Description of proposal 14-lot single family residential subdivision • Proponent MacPherson ' s , Inc . Location of Proposal northeast corner of Monroe Ave. N. E. & N . E . 10th St. Lead Agency Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to ❑ have x❑ not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is pis not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma--a after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official Gordon Y . Ericksen Title Planni ,1)i cto Date March 15, 1977 Signature /f City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST r . l/ PUBLIC •e; "P RECTOR . BUILDING DIVISIO ` ENGINEERING DIVISIO TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TILITIES DIVISION RE DEPARTMENT HEALTH DEPARTMENT • FROM : PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1414454 ioK6411 I,Ifontact Person RE : y41Ka+b 110A gekc■ LtvSow'S ncc. -- mow v�l ( vr � • Please review the attached information regarding the subject proposal and return it to the Planning Department by 3 // a /�� with your written recommendation . Your response will be included as part of the staff report to the Hearing Examiner . Thank you , PLANNING DEPARTMENT • P1/4 Date 3 3 ?7 „.. ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS I TO : Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department Public Works Department Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) (tAtch:i.4.ei Vali1+4. SUBJECT : Review of ECF- 12 -007-77 ; Application No . : fri-OZ„S77 Action Name : iftlyAwOmpi l'Ig4- : a1/44a..fieriemil 17; c. rsieve.Wif Adci Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 0A2)(-47 Comments : ,..._77 Si l /g/iee, C- „90---7. _,... 14/C/a-0/ .- --,.R -77 i ire of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : \-- ZNy _, Z4 Comments : / QAA Signature of Dir tor or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 (OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CIT' t'PARTMENTS : • • Department : U4kIrlicS lP-vbiIGtitSchek-i- Comments : S ,►1 vu' • fta t 6 5 Signature of Director or Authoriz Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : .. 28), c E i1i ,-, ee� ,�14 Comments : _ • �� `�� / J / 75 fc?./t /-r 4)c:viiz,: CLt t,/01 Li. O Ltrrc'C�(1 l 11 t��7— P (�'T C'C. r 08 . I ei T lr)r///`r 5 //2,711 , '' —� -Signature of Director 9/ Authorized Representative Date • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative r Date I t:'W BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : Comments : • • signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date r 7 (V / , , February �9• cj}9'7'1,\1a./'}l.� �.` I .L OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER/ CITY OF RENTON i FEB 10 0( REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. "r',), ,`�.�'� e�-\'fw0 DL�,I,✓L/f APPLICANT: MacPherson ' s , Inc. FILE NO . R-007-77 LOCATION: Northeast corner of Monroe Avenue N.E. and N.E , 10th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests a rezone from GS-1 (General Classification District) (residential 35 ,000 square feet) to R-1 (Single Family Residence) . SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to RECOMMENDATION: conditions . Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions . PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows : The hearing was opened on February 8 , 1977 , at 9 : 00 a.rn, in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were sworn. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had 'received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report, including attached maps , was entered into the record by the Examiner as Exhibit #1 . Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1 , and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2 : Assessor' s Map. ' Exhibit #3: Applicant' s map, received January 11 , 1977 , designating property to be rezoned with proposed . use plan including general site dimensions and topography . Mr. . Smith indicated that the proposed plat request will be submitted if the zoning is approved, and has been prepared by Triad Associates , Inc. , 4 consulting firm. He also reported that during a previous rezone request for the subject property in 1975 , neighbors in the area had indicated a desire for single-family residential zoning for the property. Mr. Smith reported that additional comments will be forthcoming from city departments and agencies upon receipt of • preliminary and final plat requests for this property . The Examiner asked for additional comments from the Planning Department staff. There were no further comments . The Examiner requested comments from the representative for MacPherson ' s , Inc. Responding was : Mr. Scott W. Bigbie c/o Triad Associates , Inc. . 846-108th Avenue N.E . Bellevue, Washington 98004 R007- 77 Page Two Thu Examiner asked Mr. Bigbie if he concurred with Exhibit #1 . Mr. Bigbie responded that he concurred. In response to the Examiner ' s question regarding the retention of the trees on the rezone property , Mr . Bigbie stated that there is a green belt easement' on the western , southern and northern prcperty lines included in the restrictive covenants of the plat. He indicated that the lots along the western portion of the property would be larger than the minimum 7200 square feet requirement because they are located in a cul-de-sac. The Examiner commented that because the property is heavily wooded, retention of the trees is an important aspect of the development. Mr. Smith reported that a 15 to 20-foot easement will be retained which would preclude access onto Monroe Avenue N.E. and a portion up to the cul-de-sac, and would serve a dual purpose to �e access onto the streets and retain the trees as well . ive.�10c4+3- Mr. Bigbie stated that the restrictions will assure that most of the vegetation will remain if the final plat is approved at a later date , and that the applicant was amenable to the request. The hearing on Item #R-007-77 was closed at 9 : 20 a.m. by the Examiner. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS : Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS : 1 . The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues , findings of fact, applicable policies and provisions and department recommendations in this matter, and being uncontested is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and is incorporated into this report by reference as is set forth in full herein. 2 . A final Declaration of Non-Significance was approved by Gordon • Y. Ericksen, responsible official , on January 28 , 1977. 3. The land use and zoning in the area is primarily single-family residential with the exception of several churches within one- quarter mile of the site. The request is compatible with the character of the area and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. • 4 . All public services are immediately available, 5 . The previous history of potential rezoning of this property to. zones other than single-family residential has met with considerable objection from property owners in this area. 6 . Mr. Bigbie , representative for the applicant., stated that he concurred with the staff report and recommendation, CONCLUSIONS : 1 . Ordinance No . 3071 , Section 4•--3014 (b) , states that the property is potentially zoned for the reclassification being requested pursuant to the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and conditions have been met which would indicate the change is appropriate . 2 . The Land Use Report 1965 , Page 11 , Residential , states : "The successful utilization of land for low density residential development will depend on the availability of easily accessible areas which are relatively free of recurring or potential hazards such as floods , slides , and land subsidence . Residential districts should be free of manufacturing or commercial uses which would be detrimental to the community and its residents , The R-007-77 Page Three 2 . (continued) natural features and amenities that may exist or can be developed should be utilized to best advantage for the use and benefit of the community. Convenience to place of employment, shopping districts , schools , parks and other cultural activities should be inherent features of the location. " 3 . The applicant has agreed to a green belt easement on the northern, southern and western property lines . These easements are to be included as restrictive covenants on a proposed plat. Maintenance of this buffer will provide a physical buffer between the proposed new development and Monroe Avenue N.E. , an adjacent arterial , and from encroaching residential development. This is one of the last remaining heavily wooded tracts available for development, and with proper planning and selective cutting could result in one of the more attractive developments in the area. • 4 . The application is consistent with the goals , policies and location criteria for residential areas as stated in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the Land Use Report. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of the requested rezone subject to the conditions as stated in the Planning Department report to the Hearing Examiner as set forth in Exhibit #1, Section P : "Recommend approval of the rezone request subject to the retention of the existing natural vegetation on the site until subdivision and development. At such time as much significant trees and vegetation as possible will be incorporated into the development plans . Possibly restrictive covenants should be provided to ensure retention of the significant trees, especially around the north, west and south perimeters of the site. " ORDERED THIS 10th day of February, 1977 . J mes L. agstadt Land U . Hearing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of February, 1977 by certified mail to the parties of record: Les Porter , Sr . Scott W. Bigbie Kirman Taylor TRANSMITTED THIS 10th day of February, 1977 , to the following : Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Council President George J. Perry Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Don J. Smith, Renton Record-Chronicle R-007 -77 Page Four Pursuant to Ordinance No, 3071, Section 4-3015 , request for reconsideration or notice of appeal must be filed in writing on or before February 22 , 1977 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedures , errors Of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days of the conclusion of the hearing. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper, • TH +". CITY OF RENTON 2 r, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. ,RENTON, WASH. 98055 r j o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT O �� 235-2550 P4 '0 SFPjEe® . • March 2 , 1977 MacPherson ' s , Inc . • 12733 Lake City Way N . E . Seattle , WA 98125 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR RUDDELL'S FIRST ADDITION, PRELIMINARY PLAT PP-025-77 Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 1 , 1977 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 22 , 1977 Representatives of the applicant are asked to be pre- sent . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director. chael L . Smith ssociate Planner wr cc : Scott Bigbie , Triad Associates Les Porter , Highlands Church of Christ