HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA78-149 OF
4 0; ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR
0,9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540
0,9gT�D SEP.0 "Q)
.BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH •
MAYOR
May 17, 1983 •
Hillis Homes
826 SE Everett Mall Way
Everett, WA 98204
RE: Weatherwood #2/Fencing Requirement
Gentlemen:
The approval of the preliminary plat for Weatherwood #2, File No. PP-149-78, issued on
May 16, 1978, required that a fence and as much landscaping as possible be located along
the southerly property line per approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments.
Several building permits have been issued along the southerly property line without
provisions for compliance with this requirement. Please submit a detailed plan showing
construction of the fence and the width of the landscaping area adjacent to the fence for
approval by the Building and Zoning Department.
Since the fence was a condition of the preliminary plat and the requirement has not been
complied with, there is a question whether the City can legally issue anymore building
permits on the site or issue a certificate of occupancy. I have referred, the issue to the
Building Division for their information and consideration.
•
Sincerely,
t"rleAe- "aittcl "-
Roger J. Blaylock
Zoning Administrator
0149Z
cc: Jim Hanson
. . .
, . . . . . .
. . . • . . . . ., .
.. .
- -,,, • .
. . •
. .
. .
, . .
. . . • ., .• . . • .
. . .
. .
•
, .
. • .-k • ' IP - : .
. . .
. .. •
. , . . . . •
. .
. .
• . .•A, • • . • . . „ . . . .
•
- • .. .. .
•. • THE CITY OF RENTON
• . • . . MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE:SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055
' . t. 1111. • ,
• 00 -40.• . . g ." , .CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
13 •. -.. .' . 0.4,1'- -,.., • :' i0 . •• , -. •• • -.- . - • . ' , / e\40
L. RICK
BEELER 235-2593
1so N
...•;\ . :
15 . ----) • .. . .
• . '
..
-:•.:•:. ..• , . • Februe.itY-.?,,,. 1.979• . • • ' - . . - - •' r-J' -:. ' - -c‘) .-,,t .. . . ... • . . .
. .. • ,. • . -. •„ • ... . • • ,.. .., •.• .•. • • , „.
. . . . . . . .. . _,. . . . .... . . . .
" . . . — •,:.,, . _ ... . , . ,
..14t Gene 0: Farrell ' ' - c'-' : 0 r (=-‘: - . - •
_ . _
President, Shenandoah Homes
280 Hardie .Avenue S.W. • . . _.)..000 ,.4, , • , .
5:4?'-
Renton, WA 98055 i ., • • ' 'cc:7
. , . .
., . .. .
, . _ • •
, .
. . , . . . .
• • '. , . RE: Request for EXtension• on. Prelldinary Plat- NO. PO149-78, - '
' ..14eathe*Wod No.• 2. ' - ' • . . - . .
. .„
. • . . , • •. .. . . . . . • .
, • Dear Hr. Farrelli. ''. '.- . . . • - - . .
. •. .. . .
. . Pursuant to your January 16, 1979, request for ektensionrof.the expiration
, - .
period, for..thisiapplication,...I,revieWed the record and made the initial
discovery that theaPpliCatiOn'eXpired' on' DeceMber 12, 1018. The City
Council approved your application on dune 12,, 1978.' .Therefore, the
. EXaMiner. is unable to grant an extension since the. expiration 'period
' •: already-exPiredOver.aMOnth prior to your request . if I had been
• •aware oi:thejapSing of your application at' the- iime of previous -
, :- -• ' . correspondenCe, jHwOuld'have nOtitied'you' tben:
- -
. ' Similar requests from Mi.' ShaneAreceiveddanuary 5,'.1979) and from Mr
'Rody (received January 12, 1979) also sought the extension— Despite the
fact that these requests also followed expiration of the application,
: • .. • they were noi'ihe'appippriate party for filing the request and were so
notified. •Section 9-1106:2H specifically requires the "subdivider" to
. . , seek the extension The record only shows your name as the applicant!
. .
'. . . Subdivider of the property. ' ' . ,
..
. . ,-.. . . In order to 'preclude delay in completing your project, I have requested
• '. ' that the Planning Department schedule, at your convenience, another
'preliminary plat .hearing in conjunction with the final plat heaiing.
-,' , •, The preliminary plat hearing is anticipated to be only a proforma . .
• - . -- . : hearing that merely adopts the.exiSting:preliMinary plat. record: . . . .
Unfortunately, per consultation with the City Attorney, another alternative' • to resolve the matter was not available under existing ordinances after the
expiration of the-appliCation occurred.
•
. • • .. .
. .. . . .•
•. . . ". .
•
4es'ectf y, . , , ., . ...... . .
• . .
• ...•:. •. . ,. . . .
. ,
.
'' . .. . . . , ,
.
. • . . . .
• ' . '
. . • ,-, . .
.
. . . '
• ...
- ' .'''' LI 1•':-... 1641.01-ZAPH: — • '.
. .
•
1,„ Rick Beeler
. • - . , . • .. . ,
: • . Hearing. Examiner • " .. .. .. .
. . • • . .. . .
. ".
' . . . . .
. .
• . cc: IPlanning.Director ' .
. ..
Public WOrks .DirectOr • . • ' :
. . • .
. , • • . . •
. . , .. .
. , .
. .. .
. .
. • •. .. .
. . , .
. . .. • . . . .. .. . . . ,. .. . . . .
. . ,
. . .
•
�s , - . 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
z e 0
CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
co-
"Op Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593
9�rE0 SE PI
July 24, 1978
Mr. Gene 0. Farrell
Shenandoah - Greystone Corp. , Inc.
280 Hardie Avenue S.W. •
Renton, WA 98055 •
RE: File No. PP-149-78, E-170-78, E-171-78; Gene O. Farrell -
Weatherwood No. 2 Preliminary Plat.
Dear Mr. Farrell:
In response to your most recent request, 'on June 12, 1978, the City
Council concurred in the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner of
approval of your 35-lot preliminary plat subject to conditions
specified in the Examiner's Report, dated May 16, 1978.
Sely_�
•
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
Renton City Council
6/12/78 Page 3
Consent Agenda - Continued
Bid Opening June 2, 1978 bid opening, one bid received; Roadway Safety Marking
Project. Refer to Transportation Committee. (See earlier bid award. )
Proposed Street Petition was filed by J. Nielsen, Riverview Farms, 1602 Monster Rd.
Vacation SW, requesting vacation of portion of Nelson Place/Monster Road.
Monster Rd. SW Refer to Public Works Department for validation of petition and
recommendation as to appraisal ; to the Board of Public Works for
Public Hearing recommendation re retention of easements; to the Transportation
7/17/78 Committee; to the City Attorney for resolution setting date of
July 17, 1978 for public hearing.
Damages Claim Claim for Damages was filed by Myrtle Beckstrom, 2020 NE 7th St. ,
$100,000.00 alleging police brutality. Refer to City Attorney and Insurance
Carrier.
Preliminary Plat Hearing Examiner recommendation presented for approval subject to
Weatherwood No. 2 conditions PP-149-78, E-170-78 and E-171-78, Preliminary Plat and
two exceptions for Weatherwood #2, located at NE 23rd St. and
Edmonds Ave. N.E. , filed by Gene 0. Farrell . Council concur.
(Councilman Perry made inquiry of the City Attorney re conflict
of interest when property adjacent to his; being advised no conflict.)
Privacy Act Letter from Asst. City Attorney Kellogg reported the City may execute
an Addendum providing the Communications Center bear responsibility
for adoption of rules and regulations consistent with the Washington
State Criminal Records Privacy Act and approved the Valley Communica-
tions Center Contract Addendum. Concur.
Approval of MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA
Consent Agenda AS PREPARED. CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS
Final Estimate Letter from Public Works Director Gonnason requested approval for
Rolling Hills final payment to Paul Snyders Construction Co. for the Rolling
Tie Line Hills Tie Line Project (CAG 074-77) ; final payment $3,948.89.
The letter requested retained amount of $16,599.28 be paid the
contractor if after 30 days no liens or claims are filed against
the project and proof of tax payments filed. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND
PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED.
Boundary Review Letter from King County Boundary Review Board gave notification of
Board #5-4 proposed annexation by the City of Kent for Uplands area, located
east of West Valley Road and south of S. 195th St. and Russell Rd.
MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL REQUEST THE ADMINISTRATION
NOTIFY THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD, NO OBJECTIONS TO ANNEXATION.
CARRIED.
NEW BUSINESS
Planning and Committee Chairman Perry presented report recommending that an
Development L-2 zoning ordinance be developed by the Planning and Development
Committee Committee and the subject be referred back to committee. The report '
Request for noted intent that. the L-2 zone would be utilized for peculiar areas
L-2 Zone that are too small for development under the manufacturing plan
Matter Held zoning but fall within designated manufacturing plan land use area.
MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND CLYMER, HOLD THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTEE REPORT FOR AT LEAST ONE WEEK PENDING FURTHER STUDY.
CARRIED.
Secretary vs Councilman Stredicke called attention to Consent Agenda item re
Assistant Hearing Examiner Pro tem and asked for comparison with other offices
of Secretary for Hearing Examiner/Administrative Assistant. MOVED
BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, THE ADMINISTRATION (THROUGH PERSONNEL
DIRECTOR) FURNISH COMPARISON TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED.
Animal Control Councilman Stredicke requested report from the Administration re
Questions Animal Control Center in Valley and portion used by the City, also
requesting copy of number of strays impounded. Mayor Delaurenti
- asked the Police Department to furnish report.
Renton City Council
6/12/78 Page 4
New Business - Continued
Sister City Councilwoman Shinpoch extended Bon Voyage wishes to Mayor Delaurenti
Visit leaving June 15, for Nishiwaki , Japan.
Opinion on MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL REFER THE MATTER OF PARA-
Taxation of MUTUEL TAXATION LIMITATION TO ACTING CITY ATTORNEY WARREN FOR
Longacres HIS RECOMMENDATION RELATIVE TO LEGALITY. CARRIED.
Property Taxes Councilman Shane Moved for $50.00 property tax reduction for Senior !
Citizens over 65, which failed for lack of a Second. Mayor Delaurenti
noted the City did not impose property taxes and would not have I'
authority to reduce taxes.
ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND CLYMER, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED
9:05 P.M.
path't.t Q. .ea d. 1
Delores A. Mead, C.M.C.
City Clerk
. I.
I I .
i (
May 16, 1978
OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
CITY OF RENTON
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL.
APPLICANT: Gene O. Farrell - Weatherwood No. 2 FILE NO. PP-149-78
E-170-78
E-171-78
LOCATION: East side of Edmonds Avenue Northeast between Northeast
23rd Street and the existing Aloha Ranch Subdivision.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a proposed 35-lot preliminary
plat and exceptions to the subdivision ordinance to (1)
eliminate the requirement for off-site improvements along
Northeast 23rd Street, and (2) permit a cul-de-sac exceeding
the maximum length of 500 feet.
SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions.
RECOMMENDATION:
Hearing Examiner: Approval subject to conditions.
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the
REPORT: Examiner on May 3, 1978.
PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining
available information on file with the application,, and
field checking the property and surrounding area, the
Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as
follows:
The hearing was opened on May 9, 1978 at 10:55 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton
Municipal Building.
Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner.
It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed
the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1.
Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following
additional exhibits into the record:
Exhibit #2: King County Assessor's Map
Exhibit #3: Preliminary Plat Map with staff comments
• Exhibit #4: Preliminary Plat Map as submitted
Exhibit #5: Street Profile
Mr. Smith amended Section P.1 and P.2 of Exhibit #1 to include Planning Department approval
of provision of'additional lot width on Lot No. 35 and provision of minimum 80-foot lot
depth for Lot No. 16. He also added a recommendation to Section P.4 to include
consideration for reduction of impact of drainage to adjacent residents. He noted that
inclusion of distribution of remaining area of Lot No. 14 to lots within the bubble of
the cul-de-sac should be added to the final paragraph of the Planning Department
recommendation contained in Exhibit #1.
The Examiner noted that Exhibit #1 did not contain the Declaration of Non-Significance
referenced by Mr. Smith in his presentation. Mr. Smith submitted the document which was
labeled Exhibit #6 by the Examiner.
The Examiner asked the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was:
Jack Ewing
638 S. Central
Kent, WA 98031
Mr. Ewing indicated his concurrence but wished to comment on additional matters pertaining
to the development. He questioned whether installation of fire hydrants would be required
along N.E. 23rd Street south of the subject site and advised that hydrants and water mains
would be included throughout the plat. He reported concurrence with the proposed extension
j
PP-149-78 Page Two
E-170-78
E-171-78
of Harrington Place N.E. from the south property line to the proposed street, but requested
consideration of installation of fencing and landscaping strip in lieu of curbs, gutters and
paving along N.E. 23rd Street to mitigate visual impact resulting from location of back
yards of newly constructed homes abutting front yards of existing residences on the subject
street. In response to earlier discussion regarding curbing, Mr. Ewing indicated that roll
curbing would be installed. He also requested consideration of elimination of the planter
strip in order to locate the sidewalk adjacent to the curb and gutter on Harrington Place
N.E. to be extended to the south in order to reapportion the area to Lots No. 15 through!
35 and re-establish Lot 14 which had been previously eliminated.
The Examiner asked for testimony in support of the application. There was no response.
The Examiner then asked for testimony in opposition to the request. Responding was:
Gary Dubois
2729 N.E. 24th Street
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Dubois requested clarification of Building Division comments included in Exhibit #1
regarding impact of septic failure on residents of the new plat. The Examiner felt that,
the comment related to residences in the new plat and not to existing residences. Mr.
Dubois indicated that because the grade along N.E. 24th Street is below the proposed plat
such failures in the new plat would not occur but review should be made regarding impact
to existing residences at the eastern end of N.E. 24th Street on the southern side to
protect these homes from erosion and drainage during and after development. He noted that
his backyard contains a steep downward slope from the proposed plat. He requested that
sewer connection be accomplished to the south instead of to the north because of impact
on the existing streets which are in good condition and existing traffic along N.E. 24th
Street. Mr. Dubois also requested'paving of Harrington Place N.E. to the south to
accommodate significant increase in traffic as a result of the development.
Responding was:
C. J. Straub
2739 N.E. 24th Street
Renton, WA 98055
Mr. Straub indicated his concurrence in Mr. Dubois' testimony. He advised that the grade
in the backyard of his residence, located at the eastern end of the cul-de-sac on N.E. 24th
Street, is approximately 15 feet lower than the grade of the proposed plat. He noted
concerns regarding existing 75 to 100-foot tall evergreen trees located near the property
line of the proposed plat abutting his back yard which would endanger existing residences
if damaged by construction or adverse weather. He also inquired if the platted property
would be graded to the elevation of existing backyards, if existing residents would be
required to participate in a proposed Local Improvement District, and if the proposal
would contain only single family residences. The Examiner requested clarification of
Mr. Straub's request regarding the existing evergreen trees. Mr. Straub clarified thatl
certain trees which jeopardize property should be removed. He also reported an existing
situation in which motorcycles utilized the proposed site for recreational purposes and
inquired if the noise level would increase in the future. He also referenced a previous
conversation with the Examiner in which the noise level was discussed. The Examiner
reported that the referenced telephone conversation did not pertain to the subject
application but questioned whether the application had been received. Since it had not,
the Examiner indicated that the conversation had terminated. In response to Mr. Straub';s
inquiry regarding single family residences, the Examiner reported that since the property
was zoned G-7200, single family residential, a rezone would be required to increase the
density on the site.
Responding was:
Ann Berry
2725 N.E. 23rd
Renton, WA 98055
Mrs. Berry referenced a letter and petition submitted prior to the hearing. Mr. Smith I
read the letter into the record and it was labeled Exhibit #7 by the Examiner. The
letter, signed by 13 residents located on N.E. 23rd Street and Harrington Place N.E. ,
contained objections to backyards of the residences in the proposed development facing
front yards of existing residences on N.E. 23rd Street which would reuslt in an impact
on property values and' create an alley-way situation which currently did not exist in
other areas of Renton or other cities. Mrs. Berry reiterated information contained in
the exhibit and requested that N.E. 23rd Street be paved and improved to accommodate
additional traffic and encourage safety for children who currently utilize the unimproved
roadway for play.
PP-149-78 Page Four
E-170-78
E-171-78
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if final drainage plans had been approved by the Public Works
Department. Mr. Smith indicated that although final plans had not yet been submitted, the
preliminary plans had been approved. Mr. Ewing confirmed Mr. Smith's statement that a
conceptual plan containing a street profile and provisions for utilities had been submitted
and was acceptable to the Engineering Division. Mr. Smith noted that the Engineering
Division had commented in the staff report that storm water retention provisions would be
required.
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith to reiterate Planning Department recommendations added to
the final paragraph of Section P of Exhibit #1 regarding review by the Public Works
Department of distribution of Lot No. 14 within the proposed plat. Mr. Smith advised that
the recommendation would be subject to Public Works Department approval and noted that the
Planning Department had recommended deletion of the lot and reapportionment of the property
to other lots located in the bubble of the cul-de-sac limiting the total number of lots
contained in the plat to 34. Mr. Ewing indicated that the applicant had intended to retain
a 35-lot configuration. The Examiner asked Mr. Smith if review of the 35-lot proposal
had been reviewed with the applicant. Mr. Smith indicated that review had not occurred
to date.
Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding receipt of specific data relating to the
noise level from the existing gravel pit area within the site, Mr. Smith indicated that
removal of the existing trees would increase noise on the site, but the city maintained
no control over the pit area in the proposed plat. He advised that the noise level would
diminish as single family residential development occurs on the site and that the
department did not consider the increase in noise significant.
The Examiner inquired, if improvements along N.E. 23rd Street were a requirement of
Chapter 11, Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Smith indicated that improvements were a requirement
of the ordinance, but previous comments related to improvements to Harrington Place N.E.
south of the subject site which were not required. The Examiner stated that the question
of connection of the sewer system to the south or north remained unresolved. Mr. Smith
advised that the decision would be contingent upon the final design of the proposed system
approved by the Engineering Division.
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for additions, corrections or modifications to Exhibit #1.
Mr. Smith indicated that the report would remain as submitted and previously modified
with the exception of Section P.5 concerning retention of existing trees which would be
reviewed by the Planning Department for the purpose of maintaining safety for residents
located to the north of the proposed plat. He also advised that drainage plans should be
designed to prevent impact to the existing lots to the north and final review subject to
Public Works Department approval. He also noted a recommendation for Traffic Engineering
Division review of the necessity for stop signing or other safety devices at Harrington
Place N.E. and N.E. 23rd Street. The Examiner inquired if proposed traffic control devices
would be considered normal city traffic safety improvements, but not a requirement of the
proposed development. Mr. Smith discussed recommendations for stop signing at the
proposed cul-de-sac connection to Edmonds Avenue along with installation of a similar stop
sign at the connection to N.E. 23rd Street and the stub extension. The Examiner noted that
such devices could be reviewed and contained in the final plat application for public
hearing.
The Examiner asked for further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No.
PP-149-78, E-170-78 and E-171-78 was closed by the Examiner at 12:05 p.m.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the
Examiner now makes and enters the following:
FINDINGS:
1. The request is for approval of a preliminary plat of 35 lots; an exception, from the
off-site improvements; and an exception for a cul-de-sac over 500 feet in length.
2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies
and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter,
and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as
set forth in full therein.
3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental
Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance
has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official
(Exhibit #6) .
{
PP-149-78 Page Three
E-170-78
E-171-78
The Examiner asked a representative from the Engineering Division to respond to previous
inquiries relating to access and sewers. Responding was:
Don Monaghan, Office Engineer
Public Works Department
The Examiner affirmed Mr. Monaghan and reiterated the applicant's inquiry regarding the 1
loop roadway between the development and N.E. 23rd Street and Harrington Place N.E. Mr.
Monaghan reported that a 50-foot roadway would be required. Responding to the Examiner'
inquiry regarding requirements for participation of existing residents in an L.I.D. , Mr.
Monaghan indicated that such participation would be optional and not required. The Examiner
asked Mr. Monaghan to respond to the applicant's proposal for elimination of curbs and
gutters in lieu of installation of landscaping strip and fencing on N.E. 23rd Street. Mr.
Monaghan indicated that although the proposal had not previously been reviewed or discussed
with the applicant, the Engineering Division would consider and review the proposal in
future discussions.
The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for comments. Mr. Smith advised that provision of curbs
and gutters should be considered an improvement to the properties along N.E. 23rd Street,
and in lieu of sidewalks, landscape planting and fencing could utilize that area. He
noted that the Subdivision Ordinance does not provide authority to require improvements
that are either part of the plat or in the right-of-way abutting the property such as the
roadway of Harrington Place N.E. further south of the property. He noted that the Planning
Department had recommended that drainage plans be designed to prevent impact to the existing
lots to the north, and connection either to the south or north would be a matter of design
proposals and capacity of the sewer system, although he noted that the Public Works
Director had recommended connection to the north. Mr. Monaghan advised that connection
to the south would be acceptable. Responding to inquiries earlier in the hearing, Mr.
Smith advised that excavating the proposed lots to the existing grades of lots located 1
on N.E. 24th Street would not occur, and removal of specific hazardous evergreen trees
would be reviewed with residents, although retention of existing vegetation was normally !
encouraged to provide visual buffering in the area.
The Examiner asked the appliant if he wished to comment. Mr. Ewing corrected Mr. Smith's',
earlier statement regarding installation of fencing and landscaping in lieu of sidewalks
in addition to curbs and gutters. He stated that it was not the applicant's intent to
install curbs, gutters or sidewalks. Responding to objections and statements contained
in Exhibit #7, letter and petition, Mr. Ewing reported that a similar situation exists
in the Cascade Shopping Center on the eastern side of 116th Street and had been mitigated,'
with installation of fencing, grading and landscaping. He advised that all clearing of 1
trees and grading would be approved by the City of Renton. He reiterated an earlier
inquiry regarding installation of hydrants along N.E. 23rd Street. Mr. Monaghan reported
that the requirement would not be necessary if adequate coverage was provided by location
of hydrants within the plat although interconnection with the water main may be required.
The applicant requested permission to testify. Responding was:
Gene Farrell
11112 Rainier Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98178
Mr. Farrell clarified earlier inquiries and stated that minimum grading would occur on
the site, and the projected value of the proposed homes would be in the range of $75,000
to, $85,000 with some in excess of $100,000 which would substantially increase the property
value of existing surrounding residences. He reported that although he opposed the 1
extension of Harrington Place N.E. , he concurred with the Planning Department recommendation
for the extension but noted that the project would incur additional expense to the applicant
for a roadway that would accommodate only a minimal amount of traffic. He objected to
recommendations from Mr. Dubois for improvement and paving of Harrington Place N.E. to the
south, noting economic hardship and insignificant increase in traffic resulting from the
proposed development. He reiterated Mr. Ewing's comments relating to excavation, removal
of trees, and emphasized that all matters would be reviewed by appropriate departments of
the City of Renton.
The Examiner asked for further comments. Responding was:
Wilhelm 0. Heisinger
2801N.E. 23rd Street
Renton, WA 98055 1
Mr. Heisinger objected to the proposal because of possible increase in traffic and creatiion
of safety hazards. He also noted hazards associated with exposed roots of tall evergreen!
trees adjacent to the proposed plat.
•
PP-149-78 Page Six
E-170-78
E-171-78
6. N.E. 23rd Street is a right-of-way of 40 feet (Exhibit #2) which is 20 feet less
than the normal city street per Section 9-1108.7.H. Improvement of one-half of the
street would consume 27 feet (60-foot right-of-way; pavement, curb, gutter, planter
strip and sidewalk) . The standards for a 50-foot right-of-way would be 25 feet of
half-street improvements.
In view of the restricted right-of-way it can be concluded that all of the normal
street improvements cannot be constructed therein. Of first priority appears to be
a pavement of 32 to 36 feet in width (16 to 18 feet for a half-street) to safely
accommodate traffic (Section' 9-1108.7) . The remaining 4 to 8 feet can be used for
the minimum 5-foot sidewalk (Section 9-1108.7.H) and some landscaping on only one
side of the street. Since the applicant will be closing off direct access from his
lots to N.E. 23rd Street, it seems reasonable that the sidewalk should be located
on the south side of the street for the benefit of the existing residences. It is
also reasonable that the applicant should not be obligated to provide these
improvements at that location.
These aforementioned special and unusual circumstances (including Conclusion No. 5)
would indicate unusual and unreasonable hardship would accrue to the developer to
improve the south side of N.E. 23rd (Section 9-1109.1) . Although this may not
preclude the use of his land (Section 9-1109.1.A) the economics involved may be
unbearable. No rights or privileges of the applicant have been abridged (Section ,
9-1109.1.B) , but an unreasonable burden may occur to him. Not requiring the
sidewalk improvement on the north side of the street will apparently not injure
the public or other properties (Section 9-1109.1.C) . Conversely, other properties
may be damaged if sufficient room is not available for future construction of a
sidewalk along the south side of N.E. 23rd. Therefore, the exception should be
granted to not require the applicant to construct a sidewalk specified in Section
9-1108.7.H. Dedication of additional right-of-way was not recommended by staff.
7. However, as the applicant stated, a fence should be constructed along the south
property line per approval of the Planning Department. The half-street improvements
should be constructed in the optimum location and of a dimension as specified by the
Public Works Department. As much landscaping space as possible should be provided
between the curb and the fence per the Planning and Public Works Departments.
8. Careful handling is required of existing trees on the site, particularly on the
easterly one-half. Trees remaining after clearing of areas for roads and building
sites may not be able to withstand the wind velocities experienced in the past.
Therefore, trees should only be removed upon approval of the Planning Department to
preclude any damage to existing residences.
9. The Traffic Engineering Division should study the need for traffic control devices
on N.E. 23rd Street and install the devices accordingly.
10. The applicant's request to recover the loss of Lot No. 14 (due to the through
roadway connection) by reducing the right-of-way by 5 feet (width of sidewalk) was
not supported. No justification was provided the Examiner for review of this request.
It is obvious that some economic loss may occur, but undue hardship was not alleged.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's
recommendation that the City Council approve the preliminary plat of Weatherwood No. 2
subject to:
1. Revision of Lots No. 16 and 35 per Exhibit #3 and approval of the Planning Department.
2. Provision of a 50-foot right-of-way street connection from the proposed street to
Harrington Place N.E. per Exhibit #3 and approval of the Public Works Department.
3. Approval of storm drainage plans by the Public Works Department.
4. No clearing, grading or cutting of trees except as approved by the Planning Department
to insure the safety of adjacent residences.
5. No grading of the northerly 25 feet of the property.
6. Construction of a fence and as much landscaping as possible along the southerly
property line per approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments.
PP-149-78 Page Five
E-170-78
E-171-78
4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the
impact of this development.
5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. Sanitary sewers exist
within 1000 feet.
6. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and lot area
requirements of Section 4-706 (R-1) and 9-1108.23.F (Subdivision. Ordinance) , of
Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances; except Lot No. 35 must be
expanded to be larger than interior lots and Lot No. 16 must be expanded to the
80-foot minimum lot depth.
7. The applicant agreed to the staff recommendation of a connection of the proposed
cul-de-sac to existing N.E. 23rd Street at Harrington Place N.E. This renders
unnecessary the requested exception to permit a cul-de-sac of more than 500 feet in
length. According to testimony from the Public Works Department this roadway right-
of-way would be 50 feet, but the applicant preferred 45 feet of right-of-way in order
to recover the loss of Lot No. 14 through which the road passes.
8. N.E. 23rd Street abuts what will be the rear yard of the proposed lots. In lieu
of the normal off-site improvements in this street of curb, gutter, planter strip
and sidewalk, the applicant proposes rolled curb, planter strip and fence. The
existing improvements in N.E. 23rd Street consist of only paving.
9. The storm drainage plan has not been finally approved by the Public Works Department)
10. Restrictive Covenants were not submitted.
11. The proximity of the proposed road .(onto Edmonds Avenue N.E.) to N.E. 23rd and
N.E. 24th Streets appears to be acceptable from the comments in the staff report,
Exhibit #1.
12. The proposed street meets the minimum requirements of Section 9-1108.7 (Subdivision
Ordinance) .
13. Significant trees exist in the site, predominantly on the easterly one-half of the
property. Residents along the northern property line expressed concern that any
clearing of the trees may weaken and cause to fall the large trees adjacent to
their property. The applicant expressed a willingness to have the Planning Department
control retention and cutting of the trees. It was apparent that because of the
danger during storms that some trees would require removal as a result of clearing
operations for the road and building sites.
14. The easterly one-third of the site contains an average grade of about 8 to 10%.
This portion of the site lies above the elevation of the northerly abutting residences.
The applicant stated that the existing grade at the mutual property line would remain
undisturbed to prevent impact upon these residences.
15. Traffic control problems have been experienced on N.E. 23rd and Harrington Place N.EJ
This is not as a result of the proposal but is a matter for the Traffic Engineering
Division of the Public Works Department.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposal conforms to the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposal appears to serve the public interest, health, safety and welfare
(Section 9-1106.2.E. (2) ) provided certain conditions are met.
3. Sufficient land area exists to expand Lots No. 35 and 16 per Finding No. 6 and
Exhibit #3.
4. The connection of the proposed road and N.E. 23rd Street should occur to provide
better access for future residents of the subdivision and public safety vehicles.
5. It is somewhat unusual, but not unprecedented, for the southerly lots of the plat to
be located between two streets. The narrow configuration of the applicant's property
creates this unusual situation which poses few alternatives for development of a
subdivision. In reality, the proposed lots could access from either street, but
the applicant has chosen to keep access within the plat by a fence along N.E. 23rd
Street. This fence should alleviate neighborhood concerns about the visual impact
of the future residences of the subdivision.
PP-149-78 Page Seven
E-170-78
E-171-78
7. Inclusion of Conditions No. 4 and 5 in restrictive covenants for submittal with the
final plat application.
The Examiner also decides to approve an exception from the requirement to construct a
sidewalk along N.E. 23rd Street. The location of all other off-site improvements in the
northerly half of N.E. 23rd Street will be determined by the Planning and Public Works
Departments.
ORDERED THIS 16th day of May, 1978.
r:„.artin,
it:v "ice
L. -'-ek reeler
Land Use Hearing Examiner
TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of May, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties
of record:
Jack Ewing, 638 S. Central, Kent, WA 98031
Gene Farrell, 11112 Rainier Ave. S. , Seattle, WA 98178
Gary Dubois, 2729 N.E. 24th Street, Renton, WA 98055
C. J. Straub, 2739 N.E. 24th Street, Renton, WA 98055
Ann Berry, 2725 N.E. 23rd Street, Renton, WA 98055
Wilhelm O. Heisinger, 2801 N.E. 23rd Street, . Renton, WA 98055
Donald K. Crepeau, 2733 N.E. 24th Street, Renton, WA 98055
John B. Sullivan, 2633 N.E. 23rd Street, Renton, WA 98055
Don Monaghan, Office Engineer, Public Works Department.
TRANSMITTED THIS 16th day of May, 1978 to the following:
Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti
Councilman Richard M. Stredicke
Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe
Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director
Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
Ron Nelson, Building Division
Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney
Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must
be filed in writing on or before May 30, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the
decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error
in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available
at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within
fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set
forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after
review of the record, take further action as he deems proper.
An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016 which requires
that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and
meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for
inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be
purchased at cost in said office.
n p • 1
• '
; i
0•
., . ..,n .7 377 ipl.
)t• 399 I / )+a
%s 1 !wG 572 SE__
;4 it . _,. _ 4
4.
K __ 1
i
r r 1r 5" 947I 871 I 1 / i_. 1 1/ I
•
t' J�` j aoo,,t• °
_1
! r— \ L . ,, 'ptP. >aG y 1
1 G
, aiG ba R / // 1
k PACIFIC COAST / sil'-:',.
—''\ \------'
o
•
IV Sim I
50 \t '
I I P ' _ 2iT-T t o rt.pit. t 99T[!• Lt1 elz0 : C • 1 • CI*
LIMIt • �� Iii ° 1
: c � .,
- -fir_ i n ,. I
.9 l� 1
UT . . — is, I. • •40,
t 7. =5 _ -- 240 z)7I 2�21 1z Li9 zCa.1 ;l
F TT- im- - I d
[ 1 . - i -'Lr— •-- r '.- k - .-7:7r.0- 1 rl '
. �� • piix*,
'; ts� lit t•• 294 , ta1 2)v 229 `..t •. A.a •t •
Yp l
t la
-T 1 - •� 1 If r�{i 1 �1 � ,� 4E ' �r
INVIIIHI
I I --i t'4 I fillibiniiiiiiIIIRESSN'c , 1..- .• _ , .,\.1 ,
1 '94 • le, 7 Z') Z62 , Zly 242.! 295 224 -4i\,, \ siy 'e' C �y�', .t
I I • •1--.__-� � - }lr- .,.I
a r -
t r _ F . r s ".s :;1•6\l1
GT7zU® ' , �:
_
•t
?')! lb', Z2Z 2d). ty2. 241 ZI�s. Z27�� t id. 1 I I 1 1 1 . . . F \` ,,, it „•Et
} 1• gyp .�. r.
_._..__.,_1.1..� pry .I. . . w G"itooh.o.
1 III MI
in
„ i _ illiff. -_______„,,kr: ,.., . 1 . •
IIr
•1 7 I t . J \r• .%
pH tag i7, 545 I 191 ,r 24
QLi!" Z0• af' . . a• Vs,
a • .
--Ia •ri.• , ( ( '1''
I.
, I
• F - - -
` i • .� al .• �
it%. a J•• •
_ , '4 . . I 1 ..`
ilr . .1,
•
t+ i Ni. t t0 Lt., '� I 2T t '. 5 1• 1a 209 . •
•'. • '
Goo* 0. F I r M0. ,
r
FteUMINAILI Qrg 04i ve t
watirriom• * Calvert ® .6011001/1
APPLICANT TOTAL AREA
I '
PRINCIPAL ACCESS `
i
E X! S-1 I NG ZONING 4..----•— I
EXISTING USE , t'
, 1 PROPOSED' USE ' 1 , -
• G'
f 1
COMPREHENSIVE LA4O USE PLAN
COMMENTS
. . 'i.:''l
V
y,r1.
-6-...t......1„..:...,Q -
.10
1:1.1
0
-------4------] „ \
t:C 0C)(49 °I D
NN
B 0 0
II /co/7 , sr
fc '
P .
k
*\\
1 0 0 J _
cm
LI DI r--f-"n-- .1i-L. 0
.... ...........
,,.._...
co c:1 0 ' - -
0 000
At,.asfit st
NW Mel I AM.4•111.1M,.••••••••11.1....••••
VII 1
f5, 3 41/03 '
: _ (5 CI CI0 0 cr ci ri
rtti Ift EM ti %CI011--.--;-t----.. ..„ o o o I-r'l
,
3
40 ifeE • SYTH sr. , Cl
, e•
rn
I EYED fi ti; t\:\\:1 4? CI 13. ci IP (:;) y. ir.,
t;10.1-,
\
z ..-..,'7'-•
0 1\\\V\t
ret I
ei ,4 3n I 0 FCO ;13 A: t71; 7 ; , ,0 1A -
00c C) C0 ---- ., 0714
1 ED EIDP 4 4 f; 4 ii 4 R. ri Pj 4 ..
g%
au& m r4 22"0 ...e Ito*; n NI ;
4 J.
ki
) 0 *E. 4agAiO $7; '4 tr-3
•
is
I n 10 0 C:1 0 0 C?0 [23 EZ1
i 0 1 r0 tt '
4 (k
1
,
. 1
, •io 1 SC FILE" / 14-eues lit;
iil 1
u3Et7" ire \ I
•
• i ,i ib 1111
L WirAnYeAtviodop Ner.oL \ I .
I + blew Ms tifili08 nor;
Mfit
„ , I
t '
• •
1 , II
i Ili r 1
;. RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON
HEARING EXAMINER
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY 91978
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER A PM
7181940111421112,2141516
PUBLIC HEARING
MAY 9 , 19 7 a XHIBIT �`V O, �
ITEM NO. 609--i� --7g, k-77 -7t
APPLICANT: GENE 0 . FARRELL- WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2 i _ / /_7(
FILE NO : • P-149-78, PRELIMINARY PLAT , E-170-78, E-171 -78,
EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST:
,
The applicant i cant requests is the ap
proval q of a proposed 35 lot pre- ;'
liminary plat and exceptions to the subdivision ordinance to ;
( 1 ) eliminate the requirement for off-site improvements along
Northeast 23rd Street, and (2) permit a cul -de-sac exceeding 'I
the maximum length of 500 feet.
B . GENERAL INFORMATION :
L
1 . Owner of Record: GENE 0 . FARRELL __
2 . Applicant: • GENE 0 . FARRELL
i'
3 . Location: East side of Edmonds Avenue ,Northeast' ' j
between Northeast 23rd Street and the
existing Aloha Ranch Subdivision . � �,
4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is on
file in the Renton Planning ';Department;
1
5 . Size of Property: + 8.23 acres .
6 . Access : Via Edmonds Avenue Northeast and
Northeast 23rd Street.
7 . ExistingZoning : G-7200 .
8. Existing Zoning in
Area: G-7200 , Single Family Residence District
9 . Comprehensive Land
Use Plan : `; Single Family Residential 1
10 . Notification, : The applicant was notified i,n writing
of the hearing date . Notice' was pro '
perly published in the Record Chronicle
and posted in three places o'n or near
the site as required by City ordi nance1
i
C . ' PURPOSE OF REQUEST: 1, ;
To allow subdivision of the subject site into 35 single family ' 'k
residence lots ..for future development of single family > esidences . -.
In order to pOvmit such subdivision , the applicant is also requests.: i
ing e xceptionisto the subdivision ordinance , t
r ;i
D. HISTORY/BACKgROUND: `i' S'` j
The subject s'�' : e was annexed into the City of Renton b t�
No . 1796 dat lid 10-7-59 , y Yordinance.1
I 'I''II'
f is
;'i +.t.
! f .
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENr-
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GENE 0 . FARRELL--WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2
MAY 9 , 1978
PAGE TWO
E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Topography : The site rises fairly gently from west : to east
• at approximately a four per cent slope . However, the easterly
1 /3 of the site rises toward the east at approximately eight
to ten per cent slope .
•
2 . Soils : Indianola loamy fine sand ( InC ) ; runoff is slow to
medium, and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil
is used for timber and for urban development .
3 . Vegetation : The site is dominated by a heavy cover of tall
evergreen trees (east 1 /2 of site ) with wild shrubs ; and grass
ground cover.
4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suit-
able habitat for birds and small mammals .
5 . Water: There is no surface water evident on the site .
• 6 . Land Use : The land use of the site consists of a single
family home on the western edge of the property with the remainde
undeveloped .
•
F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The area is primarily single family residential in nature .
G . PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer: An existing 6 " water main is located on •
Northeast 23rd Street , a 4" main on the east side of Edmonds
Avenue Northeast, and a 12 " main on the west side of Edmonds .
An 8" sanitary sewer is located approximately 500 feet south ,
of the subject site and another 8" main is located approxi -
mately 1300 feet north of the site along Northeast 27th Street]
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as
•
per ordinance requirements .
•
3. Transit: Metro Transit route 142 operates along Edmonds
Avenue Northeast at the western boundary of the subject site .
4 . Schools : The subject site is located approximately one-
quarter mile north of Hi l-1 crest Elementary School , about
one-half mile north of McKnight Junior High School , and
• approximately two miles northwest of Hazen Senior High School .;
5 . Parks : Kennydale Lions Park is located approximately one-
quarter mile northwest of the subject site with North Highlands
Park situated about one-quarter mile south .
H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : •
•
Section 4-706 R-1 Residence Single Family .
la
I . APPLICABLE` SECT:IONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER QFFICIAL •
CITY DOCUMENTS : ;i .'
1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1106 . 2 , Preliminary Plats
2 . Subdivision. Ordinance , Section 9-1109 , Exceptions +;
3 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , P . 18 HHi4.•
•
•
�';
•
• PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TQ HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GENE 0 . FARRELL--WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2
MAY 9 , 1978
PAGE THREE
J . IMPACT ON NATURAL SYSTEMS :
Development of the subject site will disturb soil and vegetation ,
increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and
noise levels in the area . However, through proper design and pro-
vision of suitable storm water retention facilities , these impacts
can be minimized and the natural wooded character of the site
preserved .
K . SOCIAL IMPACT :
The subject request will have minimal social impact except for
those caused by minor population increase and the new relation-
ships that will be a result of such an increase .
L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental. Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW :43 . 21C
a Declaration of Non-significance has been used for the ; subject
proposal . This declaration is based on the provision of proper
sanitary sewers and preservation of as much of the existing
trees on the site as is possible .
M . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : ! i
A vicinity map and site map are attached.
N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED :
1 . City of Renton Building Division .
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division .
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering .
4. City of Renton Utilities .
5 . City of Renton Fire Department .
Copies of certain comments and memoranda are attached.
4 I
0 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS :
! 1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan which designates the site and area as single family
residential .
2 . The proposal is consistent with existing single family
residential uses in the surrounding area .
.
3 . The proposed lots are consistent with the minimum lqt size
and dimensions of the G-7200 zoning of the subject site .
However, the corner lot number 35 near Edmonds Avenue North-' ; l.! III
east should be platted' larger than interior lots . (Section : f ,,
9-1108. 23.. F(4) ) This can be accomplished by minor adjust-
mentsI .
to „
la;r er lots number 29 through 32 . Also lot number �:. .
9 9 '
16 must meet the minimum 80 foot lot depth requirement .
r '
• • PLANNING DEPARTMEN
PRELIMINARY REPORT 10 HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GENE Q . FARRELL - WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2
MAY 9 , 1978
PAGE FOUR
4 . Utilities including sewer are available to the subject site
and are proposed to be installed per City standards . The
word " dry" should be eliminated from the sanitary sewer
plan . (see Public Works Department comments . )
5 . The proposed street cross section indicates the proposed
street will meet City standards .
6 . Storm drainage plans should be subject to ordinance standards
and Public Works Department approval . (See comments . )
7 , The proposed' exception to the requirements for off-site
improvements' along N . E . 23rd Street has been reviewed by
the Public Works Department , and has determined that improvements
are necessary along N . E . 23rd Street . However , the Public
Works Department has been --recommended that the improvements
consist only of curb , gutter, andstreet paving within the
existing right-of-way and the sidewalks be excluded . Public
Works determined that no justifiable hardship exists for
complete exclusion of such improvements from the subject
plat . ( Refer to attached memo )
8. A logical outlet exists to Northeast 23rd Street at`
approximately Harrington Place Northeast. No justifi -
able hardship appears to exist which would deter the
applicant from installing such a connection (minimum
50 foot right-of-way ) and alleviating the conflict of
the proposed cul -de-sac with the 500 foot maximum cul -
de-sa.c length requirement of Section 9- 1108. 23 . A( 7 ) .
•
9 . A number of 'significant evergreen trees exist throughout
the site, especially within the easterly one-half of the
subject site . These should be preserved as much as - possi -
ble and incorporated into plat design and development . "••
( Section 9- 1108. 19. B)
10 . The proposed cul -de-sac radius is 50 feet. The minimum
ordinance requirement is 45 feet . Adjustment to ordi -
nance requirements will add to lot sizes and dimensions
around the cul -de-sac .
11 . Average grade is approximately 8 to 10 percent in the
easterly one-third of the site. Grading should be mini -
mized as much as possible to reduce any potential impacts .
12 . See attached for additional comments from other depart-
ments .
P . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS :
Recommend approval of the proposed plat subject to :
1 . Provision of additional lot width on lot number 35 . r
2 . Provision of. minimum 80 foot lot depth for lot number 16 .
3 . Provision bf utilities and street improvements per ordi - ;�
•nance •standards and Public Works Department approval .
4 . Final .Publ:1t Works Department approval of drainage plans ;:; .
including Suitable retention and oil /water separation
•
facilities !
j,.
y I.
11
.' PLANNING DEPARTMEN
PRELIMINARY REPORT 1J HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GENE 0 . FARRFLL --WEATHERW00D NUMBER 2
MAY 9 , 1978
PAGE FIVE
5 . Retention of as many significant trees on the site as
possible . Only area for right-of-way should be cleared
initially . Land clearing shal1 ' be coordinated and approved
by the Planning Department.
6 . Public Works and Planning Department approval of on-site
grading for improvements and developments .
It is further recommended that a minimum, 50 foot right-of-way with
standard improvements ! be provided accross lot number 14 to connect
the proposed cul -de-sac to Northeast 23rd Street. The remaining
area of lot number 14 shall be distributed to other lots in the
! proposed plat .
.I ,
' it
1'I
.
I!
Ili ' '
.
'I
i'
I '
i
ji
;
•
I..
•
7.0
•---L...--. -._-..._ I_t-
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED /7i,97-71
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR
REZONE (h.AEA�EVA/J0 P 1.10, 7, 4AJOR PLA . `I- 78
SITE APPROVAL
PRO;'AL SHORT PLAT ��-i4
SPECIAL PERMIT
4JAIVER
FERMI T OR EXEMPTION
I
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 4 /.? 7,?
•
S i 3NATURE
ORi :'
j'; I -AL DEPARTMENT F,PPR01' ,-, it
DEN IA :A DATE E
UILDING
T'R i F F - E i, , C13)78 ` " •
`
�1�' _ EiiGI'lEERIt'' co �J�� �5/�7i�
1 I
' -
46:i4a .5'- 7 i' I,
r HEALTH
•
' 0-1-17Grrics .* 'i,A,,4t, 12-(c-,-- 1-71 -/u/tfil-itUx-\-- , .
7r�r- -i:^r�EWERr ' 1
' = S////// COt;'1E'1TS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
___(),... v.... x,I7 e
: ! ,
,c, . : ,
f ' (ozea .
.„,e_e... k.
. .
.. ,
.. . .
, r.
. x-
io,n'_'U a `>,,t. `)1],) f� � � ,� >� ;;
e [ •1 e� �. c. �GG��f'' ,5 .I •7c
•
/
. (..7 _,...):07 __ . —
-5±--- -
PLE -.SE SIGN THE E . I . 41 . . l'
V. .11'1�I i_r` •IL- `�..�.:1i.i..i f ''��U. �;? �r�' L., !',i _.•, .., ,\
. r r �_�+� .� it
1 , 1 -'1, ' /-Q i 1.%/-fit•. /•iq i> j / //.1' ' h {.(., (••, ✓...„)'( .i v E r 1
f I) `-C' =
I
IAi
•
J
Q LI r PCt.. /PCC C S '• ff'o F—( 6 n�./ - �.i/!Cc /'/`7"1" -- (``• S
t ,!
i
8 `..
r;ii S ; ;
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED / ZAY
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE
MAJOR PLA`
SITE APPROVAL T--P-CA
Tim� r �
SPECIAL PERMIT
•
WAIVER
cHORFLINE MANAGEMENT
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION
4( (.)(cis-FL')Li is r- OF- -SIro: ruAriz-oJ��s-t0..frs ' Lo,,)yr Mg: 23 Si
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE S z.
7 !
rc • TD p li CUS Ca wvon 4.1vrg (-„-,,,,) crz.CL wt..r t_h r
FLAT-- to 1/4.-i. jN,E SrFWI_Z-QA.
SI .:NAI URL L
T - ORS p
' IN : A DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE ' i
- —� / RFFi C E- ;.d _
is G I'1 E X y/L`�7Y
•
R:tu
1:
L- n FIRE �/3 /7 I
HEALTH
•
- ; C674- ----- .
:ER ' S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : i
'I '
•
— I' ,fll
1
. I
•
PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .I! . .
i
•• ;I,
it .
•
•
1 , ilJ
•
•
t: !rl• '
•
•
.
•
•
'I' Q �:.i "., a •
'i i t
• U7
r.O I S ,,r i, E. L i. i
PLANNING DEPARTMENT • DATE ROUTED 4/7 a
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE MAJOR
tr C R PLAT
SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT
SPECIAL PERMIT •
WAIVER 1 .
.•H n:\it:_l N E MANAGEMENT _---.•-_--- I
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION Ac.uprlo&
�'
XG 7'ivrJ J s ►-o rL CAA:- p 54k1 o V z SOCK
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20 7T�a
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE S/Z/ i;
?a_ `Ta -Tc-1,--V l ou j cam AA v`)1/4-9TS O N Jam/z,in„r M,n�4 /
SIGNATURE
r. o R •
__ AL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE
UILDI;G X 4/2&-_7 ,)
I.
E'UGINEEj H
,.�,u X .04/7S'
•
CFI.R.:.)E L� :�A )7/ '
HEALTH 1
1:�
.
�r�►-n�s z7 f�
I -':ER ' S COM MENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
I
i
'41-- sr-L.-L. /L.Z
Q U- fly, n ft u.a-rx.t
:'1 1
•
r
• 'iiI
•
j ii
1 i i
li II
i
PLEASE SIGN THE, E . I .W . . ' Id
•
' t.l
! II
I' 1l
•
I, I•
•
•
I.
_
/ ,
il rI, 11
•
1 i I• . 1
i
V. , , .!
tltl `"i'';r
I.` jl 'rE; 4ty
is •,, I{';:
-r-----. --- -
•
ROUJ1NGJOR REVIEW_ OF_ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
TO : Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department
Park Department
' . Police Department
I
Public Works Department • .
Building Div . Traffic Engineering Div .
Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div .
1
FROM : Planning Department , ( signed by responsible Official or his
designee) }
H •
AlIC-1414Elit.- .441.1712-1_ _
. ,
SUBJECT : Review of ECFr 3_,,..-23 ; Application No . : 07_ fv7, 7g
Action N011o :114)g.ATIIIT,Wla22 0.0:1_2.- ,
, -
• . ! • !! .a2-t„ .iti%, ..p../ ... Arr4Q—DA.JI.--
. ..,
Please review the attached Review requested by ( date) : 4/L:i77 ,
. • I
• 'I
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
; •
Department : ' 72 :I)61:,; j i!
!I___ • ,,
, : 1
'Il
Comments :
• , I
eau4s2_,„
•,
•
. .
29)
Sinatu of Direcfoor Authorized Representative Date
• . ,
, .
•
.... _
---, . .,
••- i,,; :1
• .
kVvIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department : ,
.,
:I Comments : I) 14-4 ii 41:e* 14 44... i• ‘4.4-40,t. ,..) ;#4,:ft.... i at/44 Alr•eq., ,.H t'
„. 77-=011-7- rt-v"°"1-•—rr's`c--7"1---.• "au 6 ; 4
I . , , 1 to 4740,..,- I si-wc--.4-.4(4.---11,...,--,t"--;
, ) , 1 ,
/add ' ,I)
Signature of DiTei0 or Auffoized Reprey,ni-ai:ici--- .:-- --15Y-C6.-- • AP
,—,
4.. : C,.4...,u ') s3 '4'i ie‘...-) ? At„,`..1 m1tr- 1 - PI 6 Z.
j ,,yoid . $0 '
I
.r.gj it.4 e 4 a si _p,ok., tisdiA.is ;K.1• ev,'0.,• s *;:ji•:',!:
. . .
. ,. - /L • A/4 w w 1'h '4.h. p/. HE
. . ' . .: 1 all4rue....
lie/7 Y
'. '• ,i:flit..
j .
. .
. .
i(1_ V i t_;: [31' 0.1 li I-. i. C i -1 ' )LPARTMENTS : •
. . :
Department : urL /-7,/=-5 . ..•________
Comments : .01ii3,-o /?/-•.•Q (-t-)A,T-ti,41.... ri.,4,-/..d-1 'v.c 7 A74-73 k-, .
t-t u"or mit L... avvs-,:i 7-2) •i'-i-oiA-rs4 pc-i-Lo/okr.... syc../r4—.
'-r-t), r.--a Ji.S .
. ;
. , !
• , ;
•• 4.77— 1",—1/'76—
,
Signature of Di rectoi. or Authorized Representative Date
. ,
.
.1 .
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
; •
• Department : 7:4)4-rp/c_ E N6--/ A/ E E,e 1 At
, --7— !•,
Comments : . - I__ A 1-3 1 A1::., ' Z—
1 1
-
S . .-• c...-1- 1 v tr\ : ! —
. .:
. ..
u / -. c-:._).-& c II. ,_f.) hp..
! I;
. .
5 E c.Ti',-) /).1 ,— -7 — ON DE k7 ..4: Te.:: 1--) (6) 7-1---)d) Ph7,-,_
___ .
. ‘Signature of Dire tpla• pr Authorized Representative ( p ate i'
, e -
4.7— '-.......ef.,-.e. .r. . /
're.--•,---,..-, „,..- -
........------------ ------- _
•. , I:
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
Department ; _ y-/e,-,- 6) .-,--fr'4 e7:?4---4L-,-k.L/L.
. i
: . /
Comments : Coe, ._ 0E - s-/-1-c L-----x QFr _.s ,_570 a
- . , ...-
Arc L.- _s. /-0 A,.c. ' .,2 3---,2 ,9-1- - ,567-L- 2--,2 ,3- 7-4Z- ( •', IL,:, !
• Ocir-1/4-eXi7S • .
•... .
; !
, ! !i •
• ;. ..
: U }Z. • • t! !
, .
,---2-Y,-----\i
Si-qnature of i: i rector. r Authori zed Representati ve
. . . ,
. i • : .
.• • . . .
igLVIEW B7 OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS :
.. ,
Departments: . .
Comments :: '!: i
, , . :: : 1 ,::•1.) . . ., . . .!,. .i::1, ,, !
. ).,',',• •1.'i,,.-.'•
• , 1 '"I:, i
• :: i.; ' • 1 ;•,,II, i.i
•.' .. , i:
; , i ,11:: , ,,• ,. 11': i
' ?''' 1, • . 'f!';!***. '':: !
• ,
. .
I•! ..,...;, ;, . ),',:..4: ql,i. ,
!) 1:1. .
ji . • 1 :,'
, • , .... ;',.'.,;;!.;'N l'
.• • .... •.••• .•--.---------------..... ...".,..----.._. ___....._____....... . .. .. .. . . . . ... ..
S i rl li t)t lire of Di re( or .or Authori zed i<ep re,-..(.?n I-.a t. i v 6
Del
" . .• 4;...; : 0•:;%;ij•;i':;'•
:; ••• .1 •.;•,t; ; l!'i';!;:,;',1,../{:' ;•
• •; j;,1 i;iL s;
;i;';•':;Y• 'p,• '
'ili
;•:::;.; !i'•;.;
•, .
..f
:, • '
.
, r
. ,
•, . I
•
•
INTEROFFJCE CORRESPONDENCE
. .. .
Date April 28, 1978
1:
1 .
. I .
. •
TO: : Planning Department
I;
. ,
FROM: Public, Works
•
SUBJECT: Weatherwood Exception Request Improvements
. ! to NE 23rd St . ,
. . , .
• :1 . :
. ,
: •
The Public. Works 6epOrtment recommends the exception requebt not
be nranted. This department will approve a reduced street sec-
tion and will not 'require a sidewalk. 1. .. ,
: ,..• ...
. r• , (.• .
. ,
, .
,. • p. .1
ri , . . . . ... ..
, ..,
• . .. . .gi ,
- .
. .
... ,
RCH : pmp, , . ,, ,, •: ::, .
, I
• ,..i :
•:.! ,
,
-i , ' •,.. .
. , !! , •,, ,
. •
. .,.,,
.• , . ,";,:i .!. ;•, .
„ t
1 ...
. ..
.. , 1.
. . . ..
• 1 i•
- . , .: !,•::, ,, ,
. • , • . .!
i ..!
, , ... •ii•,, . ftE,I , H[
1 : L i . i, !'•..:i t.
1 1 .
. '
' .•
, , • •
I'• :1 : r. 1' :1
. . • I:1 HI . ; ,
I . , , ;1'11,1• 1 ;
' ;11•I;:I; I I 1
''I 1:'•I •1,• ' • 1.H.'I' ''I .
.1 1 •; "..;.11:11: :
I : • , • . . 1'1'.:.1 .'1
' • 1Ii i.. I.; '
. ... ,
1 ; 1 ' , ;I ' I • 11;I' H
'I MAIL.. ;$ •
. ,
. .
/I I i ';" II•I•It 1. 1 • 1 1/,1111:111.;:4 1•,I I
I,I!.1:'1:4,;•1;;I•1'..I.Ii101I'', I'
.. ,. ,1 •s ,...; 1,.',:I.I:i 11,i 1';,' I , .
, : . • 1 ; ;1;11' 1;'•••, • • _
:,•.: .'',1 y .1.:.• • 1?.!:';'.1":'0:::H I
. '.;1 ' !:1 ...•'' • • .
,g.,. !
'
''XH.....
1,,qj . z.., ,,,
'*, lei-:
.....1 ::'..-'hi'H
•. i, .:1'; ';.,( '' 10.4'1H
•
•
!i.J 1.,,•!!.,.,)„i.,,.. .
.;.,,,,,,, ,,. •,: -. iv
iti:;.,,, i:
• -,,AL ,,
, .1 A:16I'I • f
, .
I Nd : i,.;i: ''•: 'I' :,".1'.!',i1
ro'!
4:. 41 " .
. , • : 1...!, :,.1, . _
--
1!i 14 1 11•;,:. . IPAI.i.Hi
, , • y ,,,... .,:il, .
! • ' ••
- . . .
•
' ••
.- . . .
•
, • , .. .
. .
11 ,
, .
I•NTEROFF4rCE CORRESPONDENCE
i. 1 !
. .
, I Date April 23, 1978
,
, ;•TO: Planning Department .,
•• , . 1
FROM: Public Works Department ,.,
SUBJECT: Weathewood Exception, Cul-de-Sac Length 1,
,
. ,
11 .;
. :
. ,
!,. ,.
The Public Works Depa i rtment recommends a connection to ntersec-
;.•
tion of NE 23rd andHarrington Ave . NE , H
...• 1., ! I ,
. . •,1
, .
. 1 , • ; J.,
. • I. ! A
,•_ ,.. ; :•,.
, ; • i . , ,
RCH :pmp . . 1,.-
. • .. • , HH:,1,
• ; i•
, ' IT
.. ,
. , .
:
„ . .
• •
• ; .
1 ,
,, ,. , ; , • . i. . 1
. . :1 : • 11 ,, ., .
, ...,
. , „, • ,
•. , .... . .
• .1 :: •. , , ,
i .
, .,, i t L,L'ill. 11
I.
,: t• , , 1,-.,
, • , : I . , ,• , 1
1 . • , • ; , , •
L1 —I l'. • •
, : .1 - . . ; : I. !•, •,;:,1
. , ], . . , 1 1• : ;:,
, , ; , ,i •
, •• .: ..
, .
, , , ,,•„.• , ; :!...'1
. .. , , .. .
. .
, ••. :
. ; !
. ,
, • ;• • , : , , .
. , . : I 1 H•1 •
, ,,
I
1 "!,[• ;:;
, . •
. .
, ;. ,,i,:i••, .
. , ,. ;; ;.•, • .•
.. ;:,,,.! •
• , ii HI.,.. ,',Hd
,..1 h.: : •,i, • :
11 ., ili, i , 1 ,, ,•ji.i! ,,
H 'ri. :.i. ,'1 ii •
! i /
- • ;ii,..,!
..,:u,:.,,ii.
, ... I.; ,.,; ,;...0!,!i., : ., .
.7 .!;.1 V.ii . • • , ',,,,...T':.,,:
, • ; . • .;, ..p,i ro). ' . .- ,...,,'..1.,...:0..,,1
. .
,,.,.1..:,
, • , .
.•'','..0'!'.;'..,'. ' , . . ,
- ,
. '.'j '...Y.;,':.:1'.r:',' i ' •i •;..,Ii,
. 'H .,,Y):'i ,I.'••:• ' ; , 11::.::,1,,,:il, ., 1
.'
.
r....:.im '.,.. . -
' '..!.:,,,I
1,I.,,!;.. '..'. • A...,,,Tl:,..
P: :: •:. !. ..1. ' ''••',.';•, ;11: :;•.1:,A;—..;
! 1: ,.:, .H !! ,,
•;, • •
•
! !:0: ;.: : • ::.: i,!i •
•
•
. ., -!'!'',.
: 7,,•;••••'• .,,:• '
.'• •• •,••• ( .1 l'I•I
. :!•;;:!)., :I::
:'!! 1..."4',.t .:•:. :
, ;l•Pli.ii!:••!•; .F.',: 4110A: : i . _- 1::I.:,..••!•1 i:!
q :.,1; U, !lif.' ; : . i 1.:•!•:!•,.i!!!
. • i•-,.i•:,!•..1:
I I ; • .-
• ,• . . ,
. .
. ,
,..-- . .
'I- 70
1\,_jf•1 , 5E 115' ST I '‘ 51--- 7 7 \ '
11 I
• f31 1 I
. .1**•:. 377 i I 111.1.srzt t• to -*1 i 0.'4‘' .
.4 0 - 384 ----1 355 .1 i .
• 75 ?. '''111111111111111 El MOP 4 ! .1 '
',....372 SE -•7. ST : / 1 Iv" •i,
. .. . ... ..... . .
.. . i ... G 0o .1
1 373 •576 1 ft.
---1
I':•- ,,
' air • , • 8. • 1
., .
74 _I RP
. • . . . 91 I' • 1
ST
."---
, . .. ._ .
II .
564 r i34,7 1 571 41
374
1 ' 375
376 302 .
365 ‘1,555 '.
. . . ' . .//*'•-----01l------------------------'I'/tr;' . ' 11...,..r.,._z_______(III
. \IIIIIONtr..1111 ---Ir
1 • -
• li •
• \•-::.)
I I, *
•'/41111 _ --
396 1
1 -:-.7-----• ----------___,"
57 'G .iiii _ . ,„
,, ...
......
• , . .
.....„
545 1 7
% ' ...•
341 /A.--•••<,•::,../, i .:• I \
. I ' 1
., ., 5, • 1 ----- 1 I .4. A51.
PACiFIC. CO.
,
4•40• ...----c-,k-i-Z-E;5. A57- _ I 1' I '
566 i 35i I -, ‘i• . !
• It387 i ' --1--- ' 1
1 \ ,
A . . liki,,,,.• Ga 1 seo .
50 52 53 ,. 1 i
1 375 I i 510 ,
I •
' 4 p. \ ,
-Tim. At . , . -
% er= •kl Ti.N.1 e....11- LIM 0 1.5E T 1 :
I 1 1 281 th0 259 2 55 I 2 54 ZZ I '• 2 20 OTT
. 2 BO * --i-"'': 1! 1 !1 s e 9w-a 75i-- 1 • *
I _Sn___ . -•- i : 1. ' 1 '1 PIO - . 11 _Amp. '' 1 1
276
t
Z77 E.
___ - 240 i 237 :,!22 r 12 9 7.0 4 - 4i-.7. ,
274 ,---- 25, 1 . -
275 f- 255 : -44
.2_ ,
; : ': : •r 1.
. . , i___F,__ • 4 81e2IE 5...G ST w 1 1,
\ r* 14 OIMPliat; 1 1 \
-----.
.---. : 1 '1 1 IL 1 '.. -11 eiG11411 1 ,,r, ,i
._—_,:....
1;1 t55 262 214 7' I 254. 2.41 1 ! MO 'i 425',... ., NHL er _
.I... .***T: 111111i •
-
.... ___ . - :, :.1 ! 1:.', , 1,.. 1 _ I00-,¢ I . T **
la an gi,.,
..,,„ • 1ST; ' •71•7 *"i'1! 1. mom 1111 Orion flig s .1)' '
NI I 77, „ tS'3•14 V111: 7. -s- • .
1 ---"N'4 4' - IIIII; : .1i ''l'1,i ° '11111'" ' ' r,.:.%1;,. i i • 14'7 it,::,I,..,‘,...,.. ,,,:7 4 filiosm,.....ns•_..., Sli, 1 :
1 .1 ,1 i,,1'• 4 RIR. Stia7ECT . tio we... Is. 1 ,.;
: . __J 1 ' '' ! h.j,,:n INS 23714ST • Sure&VC',:,./.':1 :
- Z133 273 zLz • 253 242, 235 tE411,14111m.. .
E.„.,
------ A.:{...'.:•.1.'.::..:.,. :1_:' ' • ..,.. ,
, -- --- ---F 7","%to
,', i
. ,
7 I 911,4 i • e i 1 ., „..2 51 DM -8/./i/l "77.7.., ..i I li 4 i .,'• 1 •
,i2 langia4.1H 1 i
293 2194 I 2 2 .263H '52 i . 243! 2, 4: R—I li `'-'111Ap‘4.
harm , '
i-^ rums 'eel
1 i i ..., i.:. Wil
gni I' •*Airs
1311110 InntirP4Iniflit s • .<01=— ' -Tri : -17- ,
0774 5 • '' 1 : -T- - T • ..... IM
. 1 n minim IN !0 .1,,.:;. • ' ' ' ' ."'"•., .4pi.400 ,..-• li . .G.4.',r2, ,, .100 ' .. - .
. i__L_,_ II 4 sot.47.•,‘. 7-.7 .. ,0041"., ;
Ws .. Ito
i-• "... ' . El'.-.z ... 111: .WI. .,q tol a.. -- !.... .-19 \ • ' LII0
252 265 271 t44 /q•/ ,,
' 1 ( ii _•,ii_A__
-- MEM iii 1.,'I'*', •••• 7
1 .
OEM IIIIIIM*•to 7.• • , ' 1
1 ,Ii
• . •••*'• :7••:••ii•*:.:•':'''i.4...i 1330113:- '
*Ell;t/icsin f.::.,r;.:,„ ,....-,.......4 iNiihmy.v. , • 1111A
1
.." _ !ma 1.1h ilillial"Y.-. '''.• i inainilliAt o i 117, •...; •
n • ,.,‘ RHcaw c !
291 2846 I 270 1 Z4,5 11:EM,•1 En,..1-i. mgap..., . • .. roliNiit 7 * ;VI go, %,4*. :
!
111‘ . '. I 101.' .••
' I, •r .
* ' I I'''. ICI ;. ...1 SrltigitH , . oe -- — • ,
l N E 0 lbw ___.,... • 5T. Igallite.'7 '1°_, -
•'I, , !
:I• ! ., ! : I
60454 O. FAIMA.L. - 4.102gieWooD 140.6Z. 11 ...
. 1
, , l• ,. .
;.. . :,.
ti411X
ftgevilA41
ocarfor• tom* 4k switioert •. $e--‘70-48 ,
. .,.,.:.,
• 4r I,
•, ,,
. , ,.,i •,,
.
. , . ..
-"••..--•••"-- "- — • ,,. -, „, 1‘ 7- -•" i - „•
1; .'. :, •; , „,
.1 t
APPLICANT TOTAL AREA
1,1,1
.. , ,„ . .. ... ,..._._ . . .
PRINCIPAL ACCESS
, " •
, .
, , -: • ,
EXISTING ZONING 1,
, :,
• — • - .
: :,ii.,, • •,;,i
EXISTING USE
1
',..!' ...,. (IS. -
,,. ,i..iiii.
.
PROPOSEO''OSE :* •,;;!:,!! j;, ',1! .. , .. ,11„:,,,,,, • I,
,r.,...ii
... „ ..„.., ,.. ..,„ ,. „ ,. , . ,. ,, ,
. , , .,•,,,f, ,,i,.,,
II
COMPREHENSIVE ',LAO Iii1; E PLAN :
. _ , . qii;"::„!1! • ' :
COMMENTS ;:! ..4:i!:
— j.--tr,,, •'1.i 4, * , . „ ,. _ _. --- ...,- -, .., . r - ,
i!di011.1I, ! I
.
-. ...-. ..--,......--- - .„ -. , ..,, -
:iiAli ./ I ii 1!
iI*I . • :.11l' '771A4 i 11! •
/I.: ''' !ii. ;I '•* '1••!'''•4• •
-** - ' *****--**--***--- **-,*!'i -' I47.' 1,.‘n - " ' " " .„ . ,.•. * ,., ,,;k::,.'l ,I,
. „
• •. •i; ,: :.:• , , T;'if';
'' il if., ,i i , • . Ig„P;•, ,. , ,
.
'':.:
. ,
'''.'''' . ''' - ' • . .' ' . .:.'!.1 l'i Pil l';', .' ,;11:;!'„ ;:,'•
:'RI,:....' •.1. j,
co
- 0--— la -11(1' - - -- •••
i d
D .k1 h. • .
I I
_ _ 0 .-:.
- - - - ----- - -- -- —-
P4 til 41 0 ›- ..-
45 41E, •..,
IA LI 0
.
ths /46,431Vrtnitiff
t 4 h. . '7d
N
-
. /1111:3 Eit'
oksz r 1:=1
satto Dao a
CO .
4.1 413
.•fArn
0 L/Cr
r.-
"q1 0 05b _
0
fiotz 0
too . tocz
E3 . k• DO .
0
II. Itt 1 I
If°13 .‘fl Og7t . —
1 I
Q.1
, ''ClitO
.fs. ElE19
- --CI_SC9t :1
4 64 I,
1 t 0
121 Lif9t .I
Didi __ .1
0
bE3 °9Z 111 V3
...........f.i._._s__.__...,rl CI
,
: - 1,
I 4:1 a
,
r.„ 0•00°.... ...
69:„....0.
0- - _
n,t5t13 -
_
A _-___ -__ _ --..,........, ,..
vi ICI
000- CD iii.
1
so 0 E1
D 0 co ;.,....-- .;
. .-.
., 1.--1....4
5to Elk ,i ---_,.1 I t a
i
1 ,
1.44/4/ .avi-bi 5 0/VG Ida.5' e :
AO I
I r
i.
r.. ' *. 1 N.:
—7 a 0 0 i :0.1:=1 E=I vilE;312:1 Di PTil E4:1 '‘;I: D D o .. .,-
,• 0 I. cum
:: .: a
Gust 91 qcm D :0„zcil% 12:71
xi % at
3 i I I- r‘ ri Q ca,
. . r 141.
1 ifi a 1 0 1 vii.or EISCSe 0/4 I]
1
0
0 Eihr D90.42.0
, 1 4,40
1 ca 0 m 0; ; nir,5, '°114711
_ .
PROPOSED/FINAL '.,—:LARAT I ON OF SIGNIFICANCE/ .._'N-SIGNIFICANCE
(/� PRELIMINARY PLAT-149-78
Application N'e- . TENTATIVE PLAT, - 052-77 ® PROPOSED Declaration
Environmental Checklist No . ECF-258-77 ► FINAL Declaration
Description of proposal Thirty-five lot single-family residence
subdivision
Proponent RaMAC , INC. , P.O. Box 653, Renton, WA 98055
Location of Proposal East side of Edmonds Avenue N.E. adjacent to the
north side of N.E. 23rd Street.
Lead Agency CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This proposal has been determined to 0 have ►ii not have a
significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is
® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 ( 2 ) ( c ) . This decision was
ma e after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency .
negative
Reasons for /declaration of environmental significance :
1. Proposal is minor single-family residence subdivision consistent
with adjacent land uses.
2. Negative declaration is further based upon applicant's retention
of significant trees on site and incorporating into plat design
and development.
Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the
environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would
withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final )
declaration of non-significance :
RECEIVED
HEARING EXAMINER
EXHIBIT �'� . 6 MAY
l9/8
ITEM NO. l "- 7°
7181911001,12111213A5►6
Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen
Title Plann . Dir:1- tor Date July 8 , 1977
SignaturecAtt ,,,
-
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76 �'�
RECEIVED
CITY OF RENTON `y 6, 1978<,
NEARING EXAMINER
THE CITY OF RENTON MAY. 91978
PLANNING DEPARTMENT AM PM
718191101110 , . 7, ,5,6
A
Dear Sirs;
Wei the residents and owners of the developed property on the south
side of N. E.,23rd St. between Edmonds Ave. N.E. and Harrington? object to the
proposed Weatherwood No.2 development
The preliminary plat shows all houses located on the north side of
the cul-de-sac facing north with backyards facing N.E. 23rd. This condition
will have a definite negative financial impact on our property..
There is no place in the city of Renton or any other city that we
knowof where an. existing developed street will be or is used as an alleyway
for- a' new development.
NAME ADDRESS
Ai 026,,,2_ ,_.
7a 1= Est'
..,„„,/,,,6,2, /7r4e-e-,--)
�//- __,___ a i7i) 7 ), . S _z 3 A--`(\
//.,
'lc 9 0-1,</A4 g-eir-v, 27 2S A/E. ,.?3,frzi
Atuk... 0 --7J--sTice cV
,%
//."�--�` ,ep•ta.„, U'11,. ; �?�-r'\'`f? ';)G: 0 {' . Z, . -c, -(''
).t L- tL• t..i_ _ El �, �, ljk / r `� /-1 •:7
) � 'Y` � \
pk v y r v/)7 e/ 1411,6 ,-/ 6 / 4/ -4' A, .. if
' ‘),,s.12.,202,QA, , 3/4C--('-A-<-----(N,---
/it-�acf 7 =e,/3�-� //(/. ig. e o f *2.;.- 3 s" r: ��„, z
.. ,IJ 1 /
�` r/' AaAr
ltt 1.aG�'`'�1��� ;4 ; - / r 1J. ,°- ✓- -�,\ t.�(_ �l ,
EXHIBIT NO: =-'' _.
ITEM -NO. " . - /L! ('./.;(/, ,/ /•° .7° L- l 3/- /�
4
•
�� z THE CITY OF RENTON
C. .� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
z • o
c.o
' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
p �Q. L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593
�4t SEPS��O
May 23, 1978
Members, Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
•
RE: File No. PP-149-78, E-170-78, E-171-78; Gene 0. Farrell -
Weatherwood No. 2 Preliminary Plat.
Dear Council Members:
Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced •
preliminary plat request, dated May 16, 1978. The appeal period for
the application expires.on May 30, 1978, and the report- is .being
forwarded to you for review by the Planning an evelopment Committee
following the seven-day period from the date of publication.
The complete file will be transmitted to t e City Clerk on May 31,
1978, and will be placed on the Council ag nda on June 12,
If you require additional assistance or information regarding this
matter, please contact the undersigned.
Si 1Y,
L. Rick eeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
Attachment ti;% 1 2 3<6
, �,'Vok(1c�i(3 cP\
'co •
�R ,It.SZb �o F10E`1'
aL`
•
of V
•
41 0 THE CITY OF RENTON
®® Qv 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
z F o
p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
4 <4,Q- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593
o��T�D SEP1-
May 31, 1978
•
Mr. Gene O. Farrell
11112 Rainier Avenue S.
Seattle, WA 98178
RE: File No. PP-149-78, E-170-78, E-171-78; Gene 0. Farrell -
Weatherwood No. 2 Preliminary Plat.
• Dear Mr. Farrell:
This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was
approved subject to conditions as noted on the Examiner's .report of
May 16, 1978, ,has not been appealed within the time period set by
ordinance, and therefore, this application is being submitted to the
City Clerk for 'transmittal to the City Council for review. Adoption
of a resolution will occur upon final approval of the subsequent
final plat application. .
Sin -ly, - •
•
L. Rick Beeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk •
•
41 .a o THE CITY OF RENTON
- - MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
o
en MIME ` CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
��- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593
O4TED SEP1°°
. May 23, 1978
Members, Renton City Council
Renton, Washington
RE: File No. PP-149-78, . E-170-78, E-171-78; Gene 0. Farrell -
Weatherwood No. 2 Preliminary Plat.
Dear Council Members:
Attached is the- Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced
preliminary plat request; dated May 16, 1978. 'The appeal period for
the application expires on May 30, 1978, and the report is being
forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee
following the seven-day period from the date of publication. .
The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on May 31,
1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on June 12, 1978.
If you require additional assistance or information regarding this
matter, please contact the undersigned.
Si, ly,
L. Rick eeler
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
Attachment
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING
•
State of Washington)
County of King
Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon
oath disposes and states:
That on the 16th day of May 19 78 affiant
deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope
containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid,
addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled
application or petition.
•
Subscribed and sworn this \KJ - day of
19 1(4 .
Notary Public in and for the ,�tate
of Washington, residing at Renton
Application, Petition br Case: Gene O. Farrell - Weatherwood No. 2
PP-149-78, E-170-78, E-171-78
(The minwte4 contcan a W. t of the pai tie6 oti necoicd)
"T CONSIDER THE FOLOW= `
ING PETITIONS:
1. MARY P. RYAN, AP-
PLICATION FOR FOUR-:•
LOT SHORT PLAT Al:,= 'i
PROVAL, File No. 159-7E1;
AND EXCEPTION TO SUB I
DIVISION ORDINANCE •
•REGARDING PIPESTEM
Affidavit of Publication LOTS, File No. E-16078
property located on th north-
•
east corner of Taylor Place
I N.W.and N.W.6th Street.
STATE OF WASHINGTON 1 2. JOINT"VENTURES,
COUNTY OF KING ss• !INC (VICTORIA PARK NO.
4),APPLICATION FOR EX-
CEPTION'TO SUBDIVI-
.SION ORDINANCE 'TO
Margaret Harbaugh ALLOW SIDEWALKS AD-
being first duly sworn on JACENT TO CURBS; File
No. E-163-78; property lo-
s he. Chief Clerk cated in the vicinity of South
oath,deposes and says that rs the of 26th Street and Talbot Road
THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE a newspaper published four(4) westerly of.existing Victoria
times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and Park Subdivision. •
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred 3. BARBEE MILL COM-
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news PANY, INC., CONTINUA-
paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, TION OF APPLICATION
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained FOR SPECIAL PERMIT
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton FOR FILL AND GRADE,File
Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the No. .SP-133-78, AND AP-'
Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, PLICATION FOR VAR-
•
IANCE FROM THE RE-
Washington.That the annexed is a Notice of Public NTON SHORELINE MAST-
ER PROGRAM, File No.
V-161-78; property located
Hearing •
in the vicinity of existing
Barbee Mill facility and Port
Quendall facility,4101 Lake
as it was published in regular issues(and Washington Boulevard
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period North, at mouth of May
Cr.:
', GENE'O. FARRE
1 (Wo• ---..i`•• .•• 2),
of consecutive issues,commencing on the APPLICATION FOR PRE-
LIMINARY PLAT APPROV-
3o day of April 78• AL OF 3s LOT SINGLE
Y ,19 ,and ending the FAMILY =!IVISlON ,
File o.PP-149-7: PPLI-
CA � EXCEP-
day of 19 both dates TION TO SUBDIVISION •
ORDINANCE inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- CUL-DE-SAC
A REGARDING'
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH
•
AND IMPROVEMENTS
58which
ALONG N.E. 23RD
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $ l•58which STREET, Files No. E-170-
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the 78 an E-171-78;.property
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent located along the east side
insertion. of Edmonds Avenue N.E.
•
between N.E.'23rd Street
n('1 . LI- r� �� an the existing Aloha
', 1 4'(ca.c� Ranch Subdivision.
Legal descriptions of ap-
C h i e f Clerk plications noted above on ,
NOTICE ,OF PUBLIC file in the Renton Planning
HEARING Department.
30 RENTON LAND-USE
ALL INTERESTED PER-
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of SONS TO SAID PETITIONS
HEARING EXAMINER ARE INVITED TO BE PRE-
A 8 RENTON,WASHINGTON SENT AT THE PUBLIC
�lx'. ..l , 19...7... ` LAND A PUBLIC HEARING WILL HEARINGON MAY 9,1978
BE HELDUSE BYHEARING THE RENTONEXA- AT 9:00 A .TON EXPRESS
, THEIR OPINIONS.
ga.,C.,.... MINER AT HIS REGULAR GORDON Y. ERICKSEN'
Notary Pu i and for the'State of Was gton, MEETING IN THE COUN RENTON PLANNING
residing at Kent, Kin ounty. 'CIL CHAMBERS, CITY
HALL; AENTON , DIRECTOR
WASHINGTON,ON MAY 9, . Published in The Renton
1978, AT 9:00 A.M. TO Record-Chronicle April 30, \\
—Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 1978.R4919.
9th, 1955. ri
)I •
—Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, 9 �la
adopted by the newspapers of the State. i',
\ �NiN G DS__%!
CITY OF RENTON
SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO, .o01°-/.424—'�
MAJOR PLAT rOt R�iy, DATE REC' D.
TENTATIVE CFIUED ® APPLICATION FEEPRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL
FINAL MAR 31 1978 REVIEW FEE '$
�,8 ...�e..o.o....s.--.•• RECEIPT N O. `7`73 L
`'� SM NO.
/p44G DE.0: PUD NO.
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 :
1 . Plat Name & Location P// 2:7%I- `v ' ///f
2 . No. Lots______ Total Acreage 5 23 Zoning G' 7Z00
3 .• Owner 6- ' e �' ire�� Phone -772-.506.3
Address r�i
5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed
Telephone ( ' ) ( ) ( )
Electric ( •x ) ( ) ( )
Street Lights { ( X ) ( ) ( )
Natural Gas ( . ) ( ) ( )
TV Cable ( ) ( x) ( )
6 . Sanitation & Water:
( X ) City Water ( ? ) Sanitary Sewers
( ) Water District No . ( \t ) Dry Sewers
( ) Septic Tanks
7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance.
8 . DATE REFERRED TO:
ENGINEERING PARKS
BUILDING HEALTH
TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY
FIRE COUNTY PLANNING
BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER
9 . STAFF ACTION :
TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED
APPEALED EXPIRED
0 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'S ACTION:
SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
_1 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
;..2. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS :
DATE DATE BOND NO. AND
TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT
Planning Dept .
Rev. 1/77
r-
CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM /� ®F
� RE/7 kt\-/kA
, D o
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 7�`'`��
Application No. DPP- s' 78 "i a�
Environmental Checklist No. ECG-329_78 G uEPARI�
. PROPOSED, date: -- FINAL , date :•
_
0 Declaration of Si• gnificance Declaration of Significance
®-Declaratsion of Non-Significance El Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS :
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals . The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major .actions significantly affecting the quality of the 'environment.
The, purpose. of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal 'is` such a major action.
. . Please' answe'r the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently:- available .to you. Where ,explanations of your answers are required , or where
. you believe an" explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided , or use additional pages if necessary. You should
include. references to any reports or studies 'of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant -to_-tiie 'answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
• agencies 'involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessiry delay.
The following. questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
• you are cur.rently• applyi.ng or the proposal .for which approval is sought. Your answers
shoul.d,, inc,lude the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may hot occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will . be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
. out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE : ' Thts is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington-"for various types of proposals.. Many of the questions may not apply to
• your proposal . I-f a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
. next questi.on. -
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM'
• I . . 'BACKGROUND
i'. Name of Proponent ne _D /�� __.
•
. `. : Address and phone number of Proponent : .
- - 3•. Date Checklist submitted -.7�-":..5/- �L�,I-. Agency Agency requiring Checklist' /j ,, �i.,i/i/�- .,7
• 5. Name of .proposal , if applicable: i
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design._ elements, and other factors. that will give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
•
o �� ��xl'' �._ f', �3 a Wires
L Mc7,7c s . e 'W s,.
. • • . . . ,. . .
.. •----.. . . . , -----...,
. . .. .
'',-....... '. . ., - • -• : • .: .: . '• --: : ,, .
•
._. , .-., .... . . . •
• „. -2-
• .•••, .. . •
. .
. .
...- . • .
. :, .. . .
. . .
• ' •
' 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical' setting' of the proposal , as well . .. .
. .
as the extent of .the., landa_r44 affected by any. environmental impacts. including . •
any other Information--needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- . .
. , . Mantal, setting of the proposal ) :
, .
_ . -.• / /4
. . . - e , e / ,/, ,
' 4P.--1=7 74:eloVe . .e7 /-477- - --123-/-1Z37,0/ Ve.Al;
. ,
. • / ,:..2-7'l /-4.--n-1 •
.7g 4,1147-S74 ,,,K,i/-
• I 5:c'e .4(e/-- ..‹,/ 74-7-t-e7,s , . .
. .8. Estimated date for completion of. the .proposal : •
_ • •
* o - 79 . . , . • . . '
. : . . .
.. ,
. . .
. . .
. . . . . .. • . . ,
9. :List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
:(federal , state and local--including rezones).: . • - . • • . - . . ,
, ,. , ... ,
70' ?•,2e. 7. 1-'1-7 „ , • • .
• .
.. • . ,
• •.. ,,
. • •
• , . ,
. .. .
. .. . .
• . .
. .. ,. • • . • • . .
. . . .
. .. . ,
. .,. , . • .
, . . , .. . . .- . . . ,
10. :06youhave, any:::,plans' for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or.:_ COhneted with this proposal? If yes, explain
. .
. .,.
, -..• . 0 •. ,
. .
. . • . .. , .. . • ::
• • • . ' .
• . . ,
,1.L. Do:.you.iilow.,,Of a..ny pl4tns..., by others• whicil- may-affect the property covered by
.:--your' proposal?- If,.Y yes,' explain
' '. * . ' ,-.:.•,....,.. .-. ,,, ,. . - . • • .
•
.;,, ,..'.: ..:-.,- .. -.,- !... -....,..,,,. ,.,.•,,,-..,.* ,..;- :,., .0.0, ,',.:. . - . . ._ - . . • .
. , .
. .
.--- - .. . .
, : . 1.2'. : Attach-any_ gther. application form that has been completed regarding the pro-.
• *iiiatvif-,4glifihasbeen".COmgitted. but is .expected to be filed at some future
▪ dttev.deatrilm,the,natyre .,Of 'SyCh tOpliCation 'form-:
• , : .
. ,
. .
. .
. .
•
•• . . • .
. . .
. . . .: . ' • . ' . . . . .
'--,.21' ::i.,t:', • ;' ;.-::' ', :',''. r''''.'',',:':''f -.' -'-;.--i.'q:.;'"ii'f,';'). 3''Y'.•:. ':' • . ' • •. ' ' :'' '' . '
. .
•
▪ TI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(E$,014mOto.n4Yof all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) . .
..
(1) i,'Iarth Will the proposal -result in; . , , •
....:'i.',.:., .:;.,'' . • ."' -'''''-- ' ' ' - . . • . . . ,
' --.- - ' . ' - '.. . . •. . „ . . .
4a1.-;Mir.SttOl0earth- conditiOns or in -changes in geologic . •
'..,-`.4.4hStrUCii.a.r.es? . . , • . - .
TET- MAW 41e; • . •
_.
,::f'.', . ,.. :' . - -'-..--: - • .- ---,. ---- - . : • .
04; ptsygptigns. displacements , compaction or_over-
-,. .- . :::::,-,.':c•.,,-t2coverimg of the soil? . X'
. , YET WATOT WU' . .
. ...
':',71:::k,--::' • :':. ''..,:...:14::::::::Ch7*.hgetly( toporaphy or ground surface relief,:
features? . )(
:.4,;.'''!.:.•• ,•.:•.': ••:-.i-..•---.'.'-•: •:-5i ! . • •:• . . ••
. irrr" MAYBE
_ • . . .
.. .
,
. .
4(11''' The :ctestruCttoii., Ch.Vering or modification of any
:-...
UniqudegeOlobt6."or physical features? ' . - . : • .X. ,
, • -
Tar- MAYBE 00
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils.. . . .
either on or off the site? ' - •
YES R-ATTE" NO • ,
•
. „ ,•, • , •
-.- :.(f) . Changes in deposition or erosion .of beach sands, or . . . .
'''.Y. -•-• '. ' . . . .changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which, . . . . , .
PaY,M9011.Y. the'Obannel of .a .-river or stream or the , . •
bOd: of the. oceranor any bay, inlet or lake? . : :
-,::, .• . -. , • .,
YES
• ..
., . : e5"-..-4?.?X%,,T ' 6/1/4./ Af e72‘re... : FITir
Explanation
. , . .' -,16- ' Are t-04.0eH re,..5,8e?' e54 5
.7 a..
: .. . • -f-}2 -. 0AW._.5 •.'-
•
. .
• • . . , ,
. .
. :
: . .
• • •
, . . ... _ . . . . . .
• . • • . • • - • . .
•
. .. ,. . . - • . , ,. ., - • .
•
. . .
. • • .
•
. , .
, • .• . . • •
. • .
•
. , , . . . : . 1'. •
, • . .. , . .. . • : . , ;:-
•
• •
. „
-3- __
(2) ' Air. Will the proposal result in: .
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality? ,
' YES MAYBE Nr
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? x •
TM MATT Nl-
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or ' '
regionally? K •
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
' (3) Water. . Will the proposal result in:
(a") , Chdnge.s i,n currents , or the course of direction of
' 'water. movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X
.. YES MAYBE NO
(b') Changes. in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or .
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? '
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
YES MAYBE NO •
('d) ,Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
YES .MAYBE NO
(e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to .
.. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
YES KATE NO .
(f) ;-, Alteration of the direction or rate of• flow of. .
- ground waters? .
YES MAYBE NO^
. ,',(g) '. .Change in the quantity of ground waters , either
_ .through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
- 1,1ite-rception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? _
YES ' MAYBE NO
(h), ',Deterioration in ground water quality, either through .
•
d:i.rect .injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
- phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria,.
. or other substances into the 'ground waters?
. • . • YES MAYBE NO
(i ) Reduction in the amount water otherwise available •
fpr public water supplies? - 'x.
YES WWI- NO
Explanation: rye!/G� 2-07' 67/7 /i1ei`--e'I�SE'l
- /2t,-)e7 •. e'e c7c.'YEl ii,7e.w '. ...e.Aiil '7/
.,e e, 747.e.efri _ /sl fD 6'e-,ce9e€rT / � /, ;u ','ct e 5-
y
(4) ' Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
.species_ of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass, crops , '
microflora and. aquatic plants)?
MAYBE ,X--- .
',(b) •Red.uction of- the numbers of any unique , rare or
' endangered species of flora? , •
1VES MAYBE r
. (c) Introduction of' new species of flora into an area, or ..
in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing ,/ •
. 'species? • x
YES' MBE NO
(d) ' -Reduct•ion' in acreage of any agricultural crop? ,
Explanation:
•
•
- -4-
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
•
• (a) Changes in the diversity of speciesr or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds , land animals including
reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms ,
insects or microfauna)? 7C
YES• M—AYB NE
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area ,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
YES MAYBE N0 •
•
Explanation:
•
•
•
(6) `Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? x
YES MAYBE f�0
Explanation: '
•
•
•
' (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?, ' •
YES M YBE NO
•
Expla:n:ation:
.
•
•
•
•
(6) Land Use. Wil.l . the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or pla'nned- land use of an area? K
YES—.
MAYBE q0 ..
Explanation: ,
•
(9) ...Natural Resources: Will the proposal result in :
•
. ,+ H;`,(a) Increase.•in the rate of use of any natural resources?
YES MAYBE NO
• (b) Depletion of any norr•renewahle natural resource?
YES MAYBE NO
. `Explanation:
(10). . Risk..of Upset. Does the proposal .involve a risk of an
efcp1o'0.on or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but;' no't limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation)
'tn ..the event of an accident or upset conditions?
: .. YES M—B NUS
•
•
Explanation:
•
•
•
(11) ',;PopuTation. Will the proposal alter the location , distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population.
of an area?
. YES— M YBE NO•
Explanation:
•
-5-
• (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,• or
• create a demand for additional housing? Y
• YE.S MAYBE NO '
Exp1anation: GCJl// CCeQ. 4• e/-t.J hd'Tlte 5
•
( 13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: `/
(a). Generation of additional vehicular movement? J1
YES MAYBE NO
(b) • Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new, parking?
YES' MAYBE . NO
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
YES MAYBE
• (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? X
YES MAYBE NO
•
(e) Alteration's to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
YES MAYBE NO •
. (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
V- MAY
/� / BE NO
• Explanation: /:', . //7C%2!_$P
• (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in ,any of the following areas :
(a) Fire protection?
YES FUR' NO
(b.) Police protection? x
YES MAYBE ii
'(c) Schools?
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE NO • ,
•(e)' Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
YES MAYBE NNO
(f.) Other governmental services? • . .
YES MAYbE NO
•
Explanation: ,
05) ,Energy, _ Will the proposal result :in: .
,(a.) Us.e of substantialamounts of fuel or energy?
Y' — MAYBE 'NO
(b). Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development ':of. neW sources of energy?
YES,- MAYBE NO
Explanation:
•
(16,) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or ,alterations to the following utilities : • '
(a) Power or natural gas?
YES MAYBE , NO
(b) Communications systems? •
YES MAYBE•
NO
(c)' Water?
• YES MAYBE NO
•
•
•
. .
• .r, . • . .. . ...
. ,• ,
,
..,,, „..
. . , , . . . . .
. . .
. .
, . . • • • .
. . , . t,' • . • .
-6- ,' ' _ • ,
. ,. . . .. ..
. , . .. ,
. . . . ,
. . „ . . , . .• :(4) ' Sewer or septic tanks?
. . • .
' ..
YES MAYBE
. . ..„, . ..••• , . , .
. . . . . - . . .
. . (e) Storm water drainage? . . X... YES RTTWE NO •
(0, -Solid waste and disposal?. .
•
. . . yu MAYBE NO
. . .
. .. .
- - .. . • . .
Explanation: kg,.‘ 1 5ee.
. 1 • ,'• '
. .. . ,
. • . , '' - ' , 1.-y2Vee2/ ,/-; . 1,0 rafr-e:/ae 1 s&71 c7,/e.fr'e/r7.zed,.7t.:
. • • .. .
.•. .
17•:. . 6-7.ey .•.i., / ?....5;,.4.,1,1e".5 e..,,, . , /a•e"e" 4' ''
• .7.%5":,174,;-91:1 .'//' ' l'e'
. ,
."6,,T74-27 e2W4./ ,..?,; 7‘5,(7,,,,,4e7_5'. .
. .'.. ,
• (17) .HUmin Health. Will .the •proposal result in the creation of
. .-.„ any health hazad .pr,potenttatnealth .hazard (excluding • .
• . . . , . . . C.
- - : . -•: , mentaLheatth)? -. •
• - VT MAYBE Nr '
• , .
, . • - . :
. ,• . , . . . . . , - .-. -
. . ' Explanation:. . . . •. . ,. .
. . ,. . ,
. . ,
. . . .
•
• . •
. . _ . .. .
. •. . .. .
. , .
'-'- ' ' •• . ' . , _
• (10) Aesthetics,-„ Will the proposal result in the obstruction of •
anystenit,vistvor view open to the public, or will the
propose1401Ult'in- the' creation of an aesthetically, offensive
site open to public view?
' '.. • ' • . YES MAYBE 0 .
•
. „ . . .
Expl'ination: • .
, . . ..
. . . .
. . . . .
. . . _. „ . .
•
• . •
. . .
. .
. . . .. . . • •
. . .. .
. • •
•„... . .
. - :- (10) lecreetion;'. Will thelproposal result in an impact upon the ,
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? . : .
YES KKYTIT
. .-.'.:.- ' ''''': ' . '-'-';'-. ';'.:;•',.'1:A,'''',;!,....,;::':' .1 • .
Elolttatiiin:. . . •
; . .
.,_-_:..-.. .: .._ • .
. _. • • .
. .
. . . . -
. . • •
. . .
. .. „
. . .
(20) -Archeologicat/HistOrical . . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
... ,: TES RATB-177
. •
. .. . ,. . .. . .
' • .': ',.-.. Explanation: - . • '
. . • . .. ,. ,
, •
• , .
. , . ,.. ... .
. _ , • . . „
•
•
, . .
• .
...•,. , .
„ --. .• ., . ,, ..,,f• - .. . .
. . . . . .
A11. SIGNATURE . -
1 , the undersigned. state to the best of my knowledge the above information , ..
. . . . 1I:,.true,and. coMplete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla-
ration o0onsigilificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
. .
• _ there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
..... .,, ., . , . •„.,,.,.. r. • . , -.' ' -,. - •• . .
. . .. . .
. : . Proponent: Jose/• ,r/t •(.--,,ey .
.
. .. ,.. ..
gned •
7 •/ /3.'7--;(‘
. . ,
, .. .. .
. . .
. ,
. -- . , _ . . .
. ;• . .. .
. (name printed)
' • . •
•. . ,
. .
" • • • • • ' . ..• . .. , ... ,
. .. , . ... - . ,„ • • . . .
, . . .
• . . . . .
. , . , • •. • . . • .
. ,. .
. :
. . .
. .•,,' : - ' , • . . . ..
- , - : •. . . . . . ,•. City of Renton _
•
• ••..• • Planning Department
.
. _. •- ' ,
5-76 , . .
' . .' . . „
. • . .
. . . . . . .. . ,.• .
. . . .
. . • . . . .. . .
. . .. .
• . . • :. .. •
. • . •
. . .
. .
, - •
•• • • . . , .
. . ,
• '
. . • . ,
. .
. .
. . . . . .. . -
. .
...-:- : . . -....,- „ . ,. •
• - . . . , . . . .
11'1 John R.Ewing &Assodo tEs
J �
civil Engine-cps-land surveyors
April 18, 1978
Mr. Mike Smith, Planner
Renton Planning Dept.
'3 7_ A to•. _Sri
Renton Wachinotnn •
gRQ��i
Re: Proposed Plat of Wcatherwoor. No. 1. in the City of Renton
•
Dear Mike:
In reviewing the Renton Subdivision Ordinance, it is requested that the.
developer on this proposed pint be allowed to install dry sewers per
section 9-1108 Section 14 B since the existing gravity sewers are more
than 1000 ft. away. There are however, sewers closer than 1000 ft.
buLa lift station would be needed if this sewer was to be used for this
project.
It is also requested that no improvements be required by this developer
for--the existing NE 23rr3 .Street. There will he no benefit to the subject
property since all lots will face on, the new street (NE 23rd Place).
The developer would also like an exception for the length of the Cul-de-
sac. If a road connection to Harrington Place was provided it would be
quite steep and detract from.a very private neighborhood with oversize
lots and expensive homes. It is possible to make this connection but it
is felt that it would be a detriment to the overall plat.
If more information is needed or if you have any questions, please give
me a call.
•
Sincere'
_ JOHN R. EWING & ASSOCIATES
_ 1 ,lL. ` :W7-: 1'4UV 'b \\
John R. Ewing, P.E. , L.S.
101 2019i8\\,45
/d �NG p�QP
EL_ Sea antrpl,KEnt._1N lint 980,.RW 185� C 33 _ ---
7
4OF 'L
"-:,..RS , o THE CITY OF RENTON
4, AY•4" MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055
O �` - CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
A (p
O 235-2550
41�rf0 4,
April 7 , 1978
King County Health Department
3001 N . E . 4th
Renton , Washington 98055
Gentlemen :
The attached proposed plat for a residential sub-
division is forwarded for your review and comment ,
particularly as it relates to septic tanks .
Thank you .
Very truly yours ,
Michael L . Smith
Associate Planner
wr
Enclosures
pF Ft •v
o s t 4-- 7.
THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
p CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(07
AO Q` 2315-2550
44). SE PI
April 28, 1978
Mr. Gene 0. Farrell
280 Hardie S.W.
Renton, WA 98055
RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE
AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL OF 35 LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION (WEATHERWOOD NO. 2) ,
File No. PP-149-78, AND APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION
ORDINANCE RE. CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH AND IMPROVEMENTS ALONG N.E. 23RD
ST. , Files E-170-78 and E-171-78; property located along the east
side of Edmonds Ave. N.E. between N.E. 23rd and existing Aloha Ranch
Dear Mr. Farrell :
The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above
mentioned application on April 24 , 1978 . A public
hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been
set for May 9 , 1978 at 9 : 00 a . m. .
Representatives of the applicant are , asked to be present .
All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing .
If you have any further questions , please call the Renton
Planning Department , 235-2550 .
Very truly yours ,
Gordon Y . Ericksen
Planning Director
I
By : f
Michae L . Smith
Associate Planner
wr
cc : Dan Shane
P . 0. Box 653
Renton , WA 98055
John R. Ewing and Associates
638 South Central
Kent , WA 98031
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
RENTON, WASHINGTON
A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
Al HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON ,
WASHINGTON , ON MAY 9 , 19 78 , AT 9 : 00 A. M . TO CONSIDER
THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS :
1 . MARY P . . RYAN , APPLICATION FOR FOUR-LOT SHORT PLAT
APPROVAL , File No . 159-78, AND EXCEPTION TO SUB-
DIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS , File
No . E- 160-78; property located on the northeast
corner of Taylor Place N . W. and N . W. 6th Street.
2 . JOINT VENTURES , INC . (VICTORIA PARK NO. 4) ,
APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
TO ALLOW SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO CURBS , File No .
E- 163-78 ; property located i•p the vicinity of
South 26th Street and Talbot Road westerly of
existing Victoria Park Subdivision .
3 . BARBEE MILL COMPANY , INC. , CONTINUATION OF APPLI-
CATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILL AND GRADE , File
No . SP- 133-78, AND APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FROM
THE RENTON SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM, File No .
V- 161-78 ; property located in the vicinity of
existing Barbee Mill facility and Port Quendall
facility , 4101 Lake Washington Boulevard North ,
at mouth of May Creek .
.k 4. GENE 0 . FARRELL (WEATHERWOOD NO . 2 ) , APPLICATION
FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 35 LOT SINGLE
FAMILY SUBDIVISION , File No . PP- 149-78 , APPLICATIONS
FOR EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING
CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH AND IMPROVEMENTS ALONG N . E . 23RD
STREET, Files No . E- 170-78 and E- 171-78 ; property
located along the east side of Edmonds Avenue N . E .
between N . E . 23rd Street and the existing Aloha
Ranch Subdivision .
Legal descriptions of applications noted above on file
in the Renton Planning Department .
ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT
THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 9 , 1978 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO
EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS_
GORDON Y . ERICKSEN
PUBLISHED April 30 , 1978 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION
I , STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES
OF THE ABOVE . DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES
ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW .
ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn
to before me, a Notary Public ,
on the 26th day of April
19 78 SIGNED •
,
PLANNING QEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING
MAY 9 , 1978
APPLICANT: GENE 0. FARRELL- WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2
FILE NO : - P-149-78, PRELIMINARY PLAT, E-170-78, E-171478,
EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
,
I
I'
A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: ,
jl
The applicant requests the approval of a proposed 35 lol pre- I!
liminary plat and exceptions to the subdivision ordinance to
( 1 ) eliminate the requirement for off-site improvements ,'.along
Northeast 23rd Street, and (2) permit a cul -de-sac exceeding
the maximum length of 500 feet. II
r
• B . GENERAL INFORMATION : , :
•,
L
1 . Owner of Record: GENE 0 . FARRELL
2 . Applicant: GENE 0 . FARRELL t !
pP 1 ,i
i,
3 . Location : East side of Edmonds Avenue ;Northeast; ; + i
between Northeast 23rd Streit and they ; '
existing Aloha Ranch Subdivi"sion . Ii
I i
.1 1
4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is on ' ! ;
file in the Renton Planning !Department,
5 . Size of Property: +_ '8.23 acres . ij
6 . Access : Via Edmonds Avenue Northeast and iI
Northeast 23rd Street.
7 . Existing ' Zo,ning : G-7200 . i. i
I
8. Existing Zoning in i,.
Area: G-7200 , Single Family Residence Distri'cti
9 . Comprehensive Land !
Use Plan: Single Family Residential •
10 . Notification : The applicant was notified ifn writing
of the hearing date . Notice was pro- '
perly published in the Record Chronicle
and posted in three places on or near::l' j
the site as required by City ordinance..
f , ,
C . PURPOSE OF REQUEST:
',I, l'
; ai
To allow subdivision of the subject site into 35 single lfa'mily
residence ., lot5 'for future development of single family residences'.;:
In order to permit such subdivision , the applicant is also request; ;�
ing except•'ior>is ��:to the subdivision ordinance . i.
11,
Fi I:I ' I
D. HISTORY/BACKq;ROUND:
The subject .si,, ; `: ";te' 'was annexed into the City of Renton by :.ordinance,,: .i °
No . 1796 dat�i .w10-7-59 , r 1,;,:,
�;,: •I
r:: 4.;,
f.,
• PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GENE 0 . FARRELL--WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2
MAY 9 , 1978
PAGE TWO
E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND:
1 . Topography : The site rises fairly gently from west to east
at approximately a four per cent slope . However, the easterly
1 /3 of the site rises toward the east at approximately eight
to ten per cent slope .
2 . Soils : Indianola loamy fine sand ( InC ) ; runoff is slow to
medium, and the erosion hazard is slight to moderate . This soil
is used for timber and for urban development.
3 . Vegetation : The site is dominated by a heavy coverof tall
evergreen trees (east 1 /2 of site ) with wild shrubs ' and grass
ground cover.
4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation on the site provides suit-
able habitat for birds and small mammals .
5 . Water: There is no surface water evident on the site .
6 . Land Use : The land. use of the site consists of a single
family home on the western edge of the property with the reMai nde
undeveloped .
F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS :
The area is primarily single family residential in nature .
G . PUBLIC SERVICES :
1 . Water and Sewer: An existing 6 " water main is located on
Northeast 23rd Street , a 4" main on the east side of Edmonds
Avenue Northeast , and a 12" main on the west side of Edmonds .
An 8" sanitary sewer is located approximately 500 feet south
of the subject site and another 8" main is located approxi -
mately 1300 feet north of the site along Northeast 27th Street!
2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as
per ordinance requirements .
3. •. Transit: Metro Transit route 142 operates along Edmonds '
Avenue Northeast at the western boundary of the subject site .
I II
4 . Schools : The subject site is located approximately , one-
quarter mile north of Hillcrest Elementary School , about
one-half mile north of McKnight Junior High School , ;.and
approximately two miles northwest of Hazen Senior High School . ,
5 . Parks : Kennydale Lions Park is located approximately one-
quarter mile northwest of the subject site with North Highlands !4
Park situated about one-quarter mile south .
H . . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE :
Section 4-706 R-1 Residence Single Family .
I . APPLICABLESECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL
CITY DOCUMENTS : k
1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1106 . 2 , . Preliminary Plats , . 1
2 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9-1109 , Exceptions ;
3 . Comprehensive plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Objective 6 , P . 18 ;
I
ili
'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER •
PUBLIC HEARING : GENE 0 . FARRELL--WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2
MAY 9 , 1978
PAGE THREE
J . IMPACT ON NATURAL SYSTEMS :
Development of the subject site will disturb soil and vegetation ,
increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and
noise levels in the area . However, through proper design and pro-
vision of suitable storm water retention facilities , these impacts
can be minimized and the natural wooded character of the site
preserved .
K . SOCIAL IMPACT : •
The subject request will have minimal social impact except for
those caused by minor population increase and the new relation-
ships that will be a result of such an increase .
L . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION :
•
Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the
State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW `43. 21C
a Declaration of Non-significance has been used for thesubject
proposal . This declaration is based on the provision of proper
sanitary sewers and preservation of as much of the existing •
• trees on the site as is possible .
M . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION :
A vicinity map and site map are attached.
N . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED:
•
•
1 . City of Renton Building Division . •
2 . City of Renton Engineering Division .
•
3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering .
•
4 . City of Renton Utilities .
5 . City of Renton Fire Department .
•
Copies of certain comments and memoranda are attached.
0 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : •
1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan which designates the site and area as single family
• ' residential .
2 . The proposal is consistent with existing single family
residential uses in the surrounding area .
3. The proposed lots are consistent with the minimum lqt size
and dimensions of the G-7200 zoning of the subject site . , ,
However, . the, corner lot number 35 near Edmonds Avenue North- 1�
;•
east should-be platted" larger than interior lots'. (Section .
9-1108. 23. F(4) ) This can be accomplished by minor : adjust-
ments to , larger lots number 29 through 32 . Also lot number
16 must met"t. the minimum 80 foot lot depth requirement .
it
•
( K � I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT'
' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GENE 0 , FARRELL - WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2
MAY 9 , 1978
. PAGE FOUR
4 . Utilities including sewer are available to the subject site
and are proposed to be installed per City standards . The
word " dry" should be eliminated from the sanitary sewer
plan . (see Public Works Department comments . )
5 , The proposed street cross section indicates the proposed
street will meet City standards .
6 . Storm drainage plans should be subject to ordinance , standards
. and Public Works Department approval . (See comments . )
7 , The proposed exception to the requirements for off-site
improvements' along N . E . 23rd Street has been reviewed by
the Public Works Department , and has determined that improvements
are necessary along P . E . 23rd Street. However , thei: Public
Works Department has been--recommended that the improvements
consist only; of curb , gutter , andstreet paving within the
existing right-of-way and the sidewalks be excluded Public '
. Works determined that no justifiable hardship exists for
• complete exclusion of such improvements from the siOject `
plat . ( Refer to attached memo )
8. A logical outlet exists to Northeast 23rd Street at' '
approximately Harrington Place Northeast. No justifi - '
able hardship appears to exist which would deter the
applicant from installing such a connection (minimum
50 foot right-of-way ) and alleviating the conflict Of •
the proposed cul -de-sac with the 500 foot maximum cul -
de-sac length requirement of Section 9- 1108. 23 . A( 7 ) r
9 . A number of' significant evergreen trees exist throughout
the site, especially within the easterly one-half of the •
subject site . These should be preserved as much as ; possi -
ble and incorporated into plat design and development .
( Section 9- 1108. 19. B )
10. The proposed cul -de-sac radius is 50 feet. The minimum . •
ordinance requirement is 45 feet . Adjustment to ordi -
nance requirements will add to lot sizes and dimensions '
around the cul -de-sac .
11 . Average grade is approximately 8 to 10 percent in the '
easterly one-third of the site. Grading should be mini - '
mized as much as possible to reduce any potential impacts .
12 . See attached for additional comments from other depart-
ments .
f
P . STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS : !; ,� ' !
Recommend approval of the proposed plat subject to :
1 . Provision of additional lot width on lot number 35. ;;
.
2 . Provision of minimum 80 foot lot depth for lot number 16 . t
3 . Provi si ors' 'of; utilities, and street i mpro..vements per Ordi -
nance "stan;dards and Public Works Department approval . . , ` •
4 . Final Public Works Department approval of drainage . plans
includin �`� ' g,. u.itable retention and oil /water separation
facilities . "'`
.
qr'' �I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRELIMINARY REPORT iu HEARING EXAMINER
PUBLIC HEARING : GENE 0 . FARRELL,-WEATHERWOOD NUMBER 2
MAY 9 , 1978
PAGE FIVE
5 . Retention of as many significant trees on the site as
possible . Only area for right-of-way should be cleared
initially . Land clearing shall • be coordinated and approved
by the Planning Department.
6 . Public Works and Planning Department approval of on-site
grading for improvements and developments .
It is further recommended that a minimum 50 foot right-of-way with
standard improvements be provided accross lot number 14 to connect
the proposed cul -de-sac to Northeast 23rd Street. The remaining
area of lot number 14 , shall be distributed to other lots in the
proposed plat .
•
•
•
1 1'
•
•
. 7.0U-C S I-;'. ni;i. E
•
PL N;; 1NG DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED / /v/7.
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR
A-K6L044.14), FLAT
RE ZONE. W�itttiviE►zwovD iJu, 7,, .,,AJOR PLAT _ -
78
SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT
. SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
SF.CELINE MANAGEMENT
PERMIT' OR EXEMPTION
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY. COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 4 /?/7)7
SIGNATURE b
•
JAL ?
Ir� I DEPARTMENT APPROB' y Dti'aIA ' DATE
UILDING P ____ ..---7.-)." .
TRAFFIC Er,'S . 05)7 -
l/ / ENGIUEERI�'\ ��, 51'1'2�
. 1. - L....---- 444i, 4 /7i, '''fr.;
HEALTH ,
`--1 C_)•TT U 71 c 1 •k- 57',!>, /2-(C•_ q,Z ,44 % ,1,ini\.— ,
• - _ S COMiJENTS OR APPROVAL CO."EDITIONS : 1
. Z , '
___. ,5,?_ . 42_ Q - d�• 2 /Z�u I
__9
GC[ .
•
, 4,6, . .,
. . ,..
/` /''47p_7-a(1- ..11 St_) ,,,e !L C-?7L2 ..1 c I ((' �'� l� saw ;
a r 1,
. • ..______ i--
------y . - . ---5 ' ---- • /
•
PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W , :
.
T ..'',i't':l4_ 'l_. `:,..'it:--,1 `',0,_ r r . •-i::r., LT, ' Iry. ,. ( hr,.-,.( ,.,,) •G yl !I
1 V /:,, f, L.• , .1,.•%i ,..+. Arr/> I / /',,. 1, i'.. . C;< y;,V, •i Y C0
f
1I
., . Q «'G- :; /Ca S I NC "S'-- - . F'/Cy /7-7f i-;,•.—S i, I
mac`��,�i��J , ,�, :a.
•
,' • 11
.
f
E:Cl I. S ,,I,,: ,i
•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED zS.
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE,
MAJOR PLA .„)SITE APPROVAL T—Rr
Arf
• SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER
•
c :', RFL I NE r'IANAGL_� FN T
•
PERMIT, OR EXEMPTION
)uAr Ito J4.1-Mkri..crs ALor.k:,!- N!3 Z3 R-47' !, ,
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENTi
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE 3 t.
.. _0 R I.
1
IN : TA'
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE
BUILDING _—) �2 —)a))
, 1.'j i,�uI !EEp7, u X y/a6 7
L /t ' FI RE� ,
/3 4-7.4' .i I
HEALTH 1,
*4-- /‘-'( . CLJTI LA TVAi:i2D 174.- .
' r P. 'SCOMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
•
iL MILL lLiti� 4�1o,Q iv { i
•
•
•
I' i
•
„.
r
PL_ -.SE SIGN THE ' E . I . U . : • ,
•
I!
•
t
, ii hli':;
•
•
;I.i
•
1 '
•;i' -
.. ' ', li' li
' t
.4, - i ,i!
.1: s;p;: 's
j
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE ROUTED (i "Z-ifii?
PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR:
REZONE MAJOR PLATSITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT
SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER i
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT -:-
PERMIT OR EXEMPTION JLG r'u,U
Xc=e COI 1 S >ti it, c.vL- D s c v sco i,� L;t; :rTi4 I.
AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , 'BEFORE /Zee
��- `Tb "V1tx)S cam A- L,•+ ' � DN /LeL.iM,�..4 /2 LAB I'
SI TURE FL -1- w) LL- p S��a-Yus'p. / ,,
OR j
IN : TAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL CATS
UILDING x- /-26---7))
• ` _ 1 TRAFr iC E?dG . X S / !l 63 - •
G N E - X y/e4/7-
+ INE T
,�i;
FI
` ' RE _ LY /' )7/
HEALTH
1 _
COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS :
#-s;��� n,c q i> tv n.t 4.(.,4 rx.t ,,,.4,,7 Z._0 c,,4"
i
I .
• I.i
PL_ —.SE SIGN THE E . I .W ,
i': I',
I
,
4 in
u
I t , t:
i'
/ V !:Sii,
•j 'li!;i
•
•
•
I I,'1 'I4
i 4•`'
;at. ii, i.,.:
F u
•
•
ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS
•
TO : Finance Department
Fire Department
Library Department .
Park Department ,
Police Department
Public Works Department I: ,
Building l di rag Div . Traffic Engineering Div .
Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div .
•
' FROM : Planning! Department , ( signed by • res.ponsible official tor his
designee )
Alluiia,S`ut-1r�___—�_ _._........._._...___�__
i
' SUBJECT : Review o'f ECF'-_3Z,,2R Application No , _ YP- /11747g ' i!
. Action Name GO,ffkrd. 00,0Q OP: Z..._.._-__..__ —_. _ —
' _ ILK-l�l_►1M I ti/s" -L.��-- l..., ' it I
ii
Please review the , attached . Review requested by ( date) : �Fl. -77`
r !; . i'
i
•
.
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : u
)i
Department : -L2)6.;
Comments , . �, a-Gea
•
-6Cs� i L lrea
; 1
CRIA2)24z,, '-.4-Piy-e-a ---- .,4,...z.e4clgot :
. v i'j
i 1, i l
l
1
Si gnatu of Director or Authorized Representative Date 1.i
. --1 --- -- -_ _--- - ------- -. .._ _ __ _-
i
I;I-- VIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : HH !ill
Department • 2 ' _ __ -- ;i i
i
Comments I) Gi.,l,'1,•4;e, 40 44- L• 444%�Q ..) ,'7';ft--.._.;:: i .
— difq, i '
• i!
t) C., 1 -cle - C...a, •erj(cee.A s --,5r0 o;s� , ',
i i
'1i i i
! )`1 7 /4 T W'•7L4 i'M- /D O d O 7 a S4�.t7)144.v'� Z@ 'Y 1041
J 1,14 4/4.T�'/!O" Yd!esouT ew /dL e,014Q�'"' l.,..el.„,44,j V`.t� i;i'f� i�,'; 1 i
'�;-icnature of Dlhe t'di" or. Authorized iZcpres :,ni- ac-iwe U;ate ;;;i ;. �;�';,
j : , .i , a�.,► 6� q �.. � , f'a v,' M-c K�r�.� o�— N`�: Z 3 $ ';i
-/ J 11 p (�' gp,
i..i'PYdt/,'u4. SO 'ri /C e7 a Xrea., Ids ih.4eva0� $ T;` ``'S{ 1
;',`pia,' `i I,'iJ
/is 1''1�vv l k. 7L ,/, 1/E . (i�;�;;: ) bpi
�,{': i Mj
' ` !i'i$i l
: • �-�--- 41.171.
f/7 Y '`+; I,t
I g
; 1i
kL '; 1 t_., iiY i,l lil. i2 C i 1 ' )APARTMENTS
Department : urt'- r -5
Comments : •Oi A -t fzf-,0 wA- i'.L ✓ ,--- N.0 t /s„,,,�.w.7, 3� . .
1.1
u St- f3/1- 4ri7 J J / n •N vwrL4 fci-•u/vsc. bcyu-ryt
•ro. r►gas .
•
Signature of Director or Authorized Representative . Date
.
i
REVIEW BY OTHER C.IT'i DEPARTMENTS : i,Department : ' -FR,4-F-/=/c_ E NGINEEA / W
:1
., I
Comments : -i L A I L, O . ,I.) I N A-- N C E - z 6 4 9
S tc-T1v +--/ UIllI) L; R, ITL 1 )\ Cr'�,) Y
•
5 &e-r!J 1�1 . '7 --- U t0 N DE le . : -2-L ti (a) T U', P/
Signature ofUire to.t� or Authorized Representative ( /date • i' .1
L
REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : �•;
a
Department : 44_ 1")/=/"/YC7=2
Comments : Fife, - D - S/i-C �X CCse'US ,sacs . /Lice l/4-✓G
ACC c 5S To ✓ .,•G. ..23.'✓ - J C7 '-rii-i7 c`f ® ://1ei.46-- -/
I
( -16-j) /
ii
�- , G, g_/7�
•
' Si-c�'nature of is i rector r +uthori zed Representative pate
H.
•q;.VI E.W BY OTHER GI TY DEP,ARTf•1ENTS :
Department : i; l
Comment ''.�
- { $ .t
' i ',1 ;,•,
y r .
•• V : .1 (G; .I P
�. i� 1 li i ��
•
•
S•i go(It III'e o i Di•rec; •o'r' or 6uthori zeri Repre:,i?n (".at: i ve IL( I. ? i~' i ( i:
>:':.•
Ii
y i•.
p 1,,:il' '!'7� , ('''
•
•
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
i
Date April 28, 1978
j:
TO: • Planning Department
FROM: Public Works j,
SUBJECT: Weatherwood Exception Request Improvements
to ME 23rd St . , •
• I
The Public Works Department recommends the exception request not
be granted . This department will approve a reduced street' sec-
tion and will not require a sidewalk,, ,
1
i t i;
l
q k
RCH pmnl
i
•
•
i I
I
` 'I
i
,i
I I
i,
• I
I i
I
i I'
!; f
i
1i i r,1
: 1. I 'j
II.4f i 'I ,I
j
• I
1.1 I Iii' I
II'
,
I I I
;
II.I I•j 4 ,I,,''II
1 1 • Ifl;i'i i
_ it _ +l!,I:u'I; I �
•
;,.!` ' ' I 1,1 . 'I,,
i 11'.; ' '�x'ilk R11
. L'iii f.!.
I, is
i ii • •'IV.: [,I'(I
iI l.,:i 1
r 17,. 1
.r„ 11f, 'I,
1'. III;I.' . p N,,i'..,, i. •
Ili F C✓1;r'r
i ,{,.
s
I�I
•
I'
INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE '
Date April 28, 1978
I
1
TO: Planning Department
FROM: Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Weatherwood Exception, Cul-de-Sac Length
,;
. d i
1, li
,
•
The Public Works Department recommends a connection to intersec- ',,
tion of NE 23rd and, Harrington Ave . NE , ::;
. .--...--1.:----, ,-.A
RCH :pmp ; I .
I.I
I1
I
f
•
I _ 'i
i •
(qI I111 I'
Ili ! 1,II!il
± .'i
1
I 1
, ,I I , I. i: '
• I • . II'
. ; il•I
111
•
(I1! I• i�l e i
•
.
• .' ,I' 'I lq ';S; 1.
' :, y7,,tl"� li
,•• ..61•0 I1'? If'V:..i ' i
:.) I 11 •;�• Y.I.,.,,
t, 1 r
i}: iIiIII' . 1.
•
.. 6 -• .
. •
. I
8 i\ 70 7i
\ [
} i.; • . "-
6.A'J l';'1,1
I . . __ 1......
. i'. 1111 1.41 pi'it 1.1 ZO 'L. i• • 0 - . ..••-•
73 72
1 111311511110, ! 5" • -:. 41 364 1 353 ,I ,
345 T 3G4 372 SE -••• 5-J \z 1 .
' , ittai i
573 •57d. ; -- '
9601;)_±, ,.., . ;
74 __ __I
_-__ 14T _,_---L
. 1 .
: . I 9
. .. , .
+I
• 1,iss ',
.•
1 i I 374 375 318 562 '365
‘L. 77 7(I
344 : ,54.7 . 571 /11
Ill •• _
" -I- - /
. \ I
3J32)// ,
-'014tr) ; r
. .
• • '.• .
, • V VP'.\- -- I' 1 \I lir' '
S7
— G 6111
_
, .• -,
ar. ss 54 363 : 566 !.i '' • , . / ' • , 1 r'
MIL
. .. %
,. ..
k
,
A w e
, .
• I .• ,
I 361
I
• ; 3615 : 351 I '‘
367 rj .
I I ‘ I
1
‘ 1 I
_-:.--• I
1..,'''''''. • I ,
r -
, i i 1 art j•KI el.+59 j 2 36! 22.1 .2..5; I-I NITM... rZ 91 T. 0T __.
,IiillN.1 ,7 41 a 1
2 60
• f. i-p.., ,. se 9G•.• •6-i-
--..112_._
, I • : i I.' ,•.
• I
, , 276 2 1:441plketc• ..a
' . I __ -I—---•-- 7e ealligi'411k
-11 1.•: ' , . I 1
Z77 237
--- z7,— _ -2- ..—. 240 :237 r .222.. 12.119 ,\__ 2.4 -- ,-,47.
I-
275 --- 255. I ., Isitnir A
:-.1...c . !
•si ! • AV:*: ' .
I s\ '
I — ---4-H,'1-4:!..::' :::..I'ill;'.L7 --,Hia .
'41 t55 252 Z/4 1 '' ' 2 214:. --;01/-• iii. Y- ,L--1-- ••--- I
' Z • 11 254 2.41 I 2.54 :r g,,IL , . !Lilbit . VAN:761; 4
r i• •,, I''',.41 , - I . •r N
i--- 1 --- - --- ---- --
61411"110.I•I..f , . li•• 1\,, • i -MR,.IS- ,"(
N a. a .r. vr. . '•; ..•;•'i t ....,.„, • '1 MI ,4-A !,!:
. — - - ! 1 ; ..ir'7,i.;:. twin • .,3 ts:.11...11,":17'.4,.-.7:•.4,t.3 . „.4 . • 101104111 110 L-A ,$ , 1
! I , , ! '': i I;'II‘:;-:_i glut. ' .,.,,,• ,. r.4'N,.. -, ,.!.;..i.' . foi,,wirs ro., , I
roe CO Pim A, , ,
--c-x- 24 73
283 2 262 253 a'I 23?.,.224:,:Al:1 . ' .1\ _ SITe • mourria.01.:;.•.
0440 i: mir.,. .
W2. 2- iI a‘i 0/\4 ,'_ ,:•_.2-I,'!!L.r.tIti.„,;fr4,4.9!'!"-,''....*..!.-'1I,.4,'::.',,---.,',1,,•----N-n.
. - . _TI
k.,r_L i1 7i1__*_•L M,I lai e 1.4I!t.l•
hi.1.1 i ini
I
.
- ., - R—I !,i,:,'.I1.,ii.IWgMt.00i.o;.rWi1-1 15'I1"p4•,.,41,,4,p.L•„Ak,,7j-,,,...43,.!.......:.‘.v,1,'',,t..,,!.,1-I..
,1
k F 1 • will • 4 ,
' I ' I r i • I L.,..-, :4______, . . • - , A..
•
•
, ! . i:;-•,,. --i_:=___- -4,__. _ . • ,; i . awri: -, . , • ..- <k. -t----'. -, .. , ,
. . Z•31'21; ST. 0. :1 1.11 1 " 1. 4. • • ' . .., .10 G-',/ , 00 LI ' ' '
, •
Lu . ....11 _ ,.,_ 9,,....,,., ,,i i.,-.• . _. .49b.. . .
,.,.. -.
, ,, ,....,...... ,.., ,.... ,.... : i 1.1..... 1-7 lap *.'•!. .....i - -' '. la !A
. I.__ --A.i'''.• !'. _ .. ,43,,'....! 4 3 •'' -11 /Op'
252 255 Z71 : 244 .,q•/ :
.,....,„. , •
pat:•i...• . . 0. 6. ( -1---41.- '
NINE I 11 . I 4
.
1 ,r
13503111.•. I l' '!ff'*17, C-::'F;..:(7 1.....1 ,:.:••%.1i'Z' .:-.; ; • , p-1,:•• ______
op
---" , - 4 ;,,z:lpf,h,c. .""1-., "._. ,maiteiro., . 1
_6 In S__. ! , —
PO- • :111thilhlt Ar .,,. ,, ii
•,lan 1 n.,n „, , __ I.. •: ,. ,s ....
__, ii :. r..I or .• 4. : ,1
/II 266. t70 26.5 ..,> z.ln.f.7..,...rim.,., ,4,. .zo, , 1J:1r." . . .i. 000,0„
. !.m.,...,40 .... ..* 7-L,4t •
0413'**. * - __---'
yoz,÷ .i ,.
N E •• 1 6.7•4 I I ••••:' .:1' .4a6. 5'"7 "Le. -ow% 1_,-
i I,: , .. i • . ! " ,
I , i , ' : • ,
' , • ;i
• ' , iikk46 o. FAMILL. - liVatteujeco go...i.
. ,
; , p . .
fit.0010114ARN Pljgr * ry-.‘44jusie r
• i . I,.
, . ! Ibtarr 1 Obli40 * Ow170011 .i *6-‘7048 .
I •
. 1 : , , i.•,.
I • ,
I ,. .
APPLICANT
TOTAL AREA • ,
'•:H.11
. .. , .
, •
. . .
PRINCIPAL ACCESS . .
,.., . . . . „ ;,.. •
c •
EXISTING ZONING
,
• .,! . + 1 , . • .. ,. .,,
. , , • 1 , • 1:1:,! ' •.1,
19•\';' '
EXISTING USE '''• :. ,,' .• ' ' ,,,,I;;•;
,4
:1 •,
. •,; ,, 1 1 .
1,,.',,,.!,,,
PROPOSED.' USE ,‘1, :...H.,;,..'' . : ' .., . •• .;!; 1 1,!:
. ......,... ..,.. .., ...,.. ...... ...„, ..... . ..., , , . . , - „.. ,•-• . 'o il : :• Ii,
!I ; . ,!,•;„
COMPREHENSIVE ,:l.:.ANp USE PLAN ,,.„,..1
:.I,',? i • ,J
•' ,,,.I,..:• i ':k . . , - . , . , .
.
. I": •.', . , hi' i .:,:1111 i .'1 'COMMENTS
.., ••<„w;. :"; ..;1',t.!''';;.y.! ' :.',.:;1!i'4,1! ::, •
II L
!y• ..1 ,• . . ! .
, . . . ,,,,,..:;•,,:::, ,:,,;,,,t!
,
• •!.: '!:Al ''I,.• !
. .
• :!, ,, "•!!!!!,'!'!:! : c
. .... ,._ . . ,..
•
• '••i!!! t"
;!'!!!,;;•:,,,,t
, I , , . • „ . _ .._ . ..
, - :!.•i:!''!'i''': ,', : . "•-"." ;.,.,„til ;,!
' , •‘' • ••:'**ii!*•,!.. ! :
r 1,:!
I
' -I.,:rtr.--'---...,-.,”•.”,„,r)".. ,Car..,"r?7,:,5,.,..:7.,. 0 - - .- . •
' . :iril .N" . . ,..:4,„•,:•••1 :,,,:I., ..
. . ..
. ,
•• •li,4"1 P )11",1,1. ('',,i 1
�.O. CA' _ -ticti = ....._ S1kil.7. _ - ^ __ -- -=
A�,Lja
D N O CLJ
:A a N. i- 4 a- o:
JNea
rhtLt No1SWt1niti O dc [Att. a r
et 49 3
•
• I Olosz g• Z
, iatIO . Bp:7 m , 1.,- --
iet: i y, w
km
< f --� boll ❑ 0
too 9t • - 0❑IoGZ
- = IDEE't I, D .
D `❑St 9L 1,1
4.- . i
° O ;9 0
a9 •
ee
F - A ❑ -- --- �---. 0
to - ---- - - 7 ..0 d-o9--Z--
-';--=- O -0 J� - 1:1 IEi -= ..�.em
Yu
- _ _OLD:0 _ - ___-_•- — —
ki
n_ . ___ _> o 0 o Ea __ _ri_ _ _____ - _ ,,,,_ __ ___ . _ _ ,_ _ __[...;3 .. -it ,..a. :: _ .,- sp.
1 1 Q:1 0
:34/ .430440 5a MG idar
r.
•
" *Ill 1251 tt: a n 0 := & t. Ei EU .i7) E
t I 1%1 s 5...
LI
, D!4 •
� ycse o,, 43 'Gar 7 a; 1 r/ 1 il
❑ ► �� c� ® L1hZ
9p� fihr �u Qvstra ❑ p1:1;; �, fl' se £stir Q J--z, ,_,.._.,