Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA74-784
1 . i4yy N RTM L.. I CF MG NSA,/ MEAp4R •D914 TION CLAIM :<+ d• _- l IAJ I I Q d \\ 1 o T 7:z� g I I Il G • J I I L[ i I I U W — S I Q o - 1 1\ , i —•- O - I I i \Jii -rj�' --- Mom'' I - - - -- a I I " I 1 ti 1 i TM Lr I I OF '-FNRY frig R DONATION C,Al-i NO q�, yj - ' GLACIER PARK CO. I; • SPECIAL PERMIT (FILL) AND SITE APPROVAL : —; L--— - - —-. ,..., I I.W I I � � } I • a �� i ( I to r— I I I W I 1 ea i I • I' • f I�.- II I ° I , G . , ,., a a , . , , 4 l a I , ° i II I - - . or— --.T Z Z I J/ ] r I T ,, 9 t IQ W ,,ly , . -\\ Iv a I I I -Q.. .r _ lu ° I � I { u ? 7 ®i Q A _ -- .0-�®1. as.••w7,.�.�. .0 !.I. a .O; re 20 L. '.',1't)• SPECIAL PERMIT '(FILL)• . SITE APPROVAL APPLICATT•ONS : - - GLACIER PARK CO. ; Appl . No . SP-784-74 ; special permit to allow filling and grading in M-P zone; property located on east side of West Valley Highway approximately 150' north of Strander blvd. . - AND APPL. No . SA-785-74; site approval for restaurant facility; . property as listed above . • • APPLICANT GLACIER PARK COMPANY TOTAL AREA 1 . 8 acres PRINCIPAL ACCESS SE-181 West Valley Highway EXISTING ZONING M-P • EXISTING USE Undeveloped PROPOSED USE • Restaurant • COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Manufacturing Park, Light Industry. COMMENTS Applicant proposes to fill the northwest corner of the site with 2800 cubic yards of material and earth cut 600 cubic yards . Proposed restaurant use would be compatible with surrounding prop- • erties given proper landscaping and drainage control . I MAP?0;;� 1 ( 1 BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE . 78"fr 7y IN M- P ZONE V3/ 7y GLHC IL- R PARK COMPlY • r'• CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON a 111A4 7". ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : 414, -/<S\, Application No. .45./a1--pd-91 Negative Dec . •Date Received 7 -'-?-70ri EIS • INSTRUCTIONS : The purpose of this information is to assist the vari - ous departments of the City , determine whether an environmental impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per- mit for a proposed -projects — Single ,family ' residential uses in non Sensitive. areas are exempt from this requirement as established by Washington Administrative Code' 173-34'. ., -‘ - . In addition to the following information , please submit a vicinity map (recommend scale : 1H reP.resancing 200° ,to 8pog ) and a site map . (rec ommended scale : 1" representing 10° to 40 ° ) . : • , APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW: 1. Name of applicant RICHARD BOUILLON & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS --- 2 . Mailing address 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, Washington 9A122 Telephone 325-2553 3. Applicant is : ElOwner (=Lessee CDContract purchaser lxiOther (specify) Architect 4. Name and address of owner, if other than applicant : BURLINGTON NORTHERN ATTENTION: MR. RICHARD VINCENT 860 CENTRAL BUILDING, SEATTLE 98104 0 Telephone 624-190Q 5 . General location of proposed project (give street address if any or nearest street •apd intersection EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY AT STRANDER BOULEVARD • 2 - 6 . Legal description (if lengthy , attach as separate sheet) Attachment 7. Area 80,266 sq.ft. Dimensions 8. Intended use of property or project ( include details : number of units , volume , etc. ) : The proposed paoject is a restaurant comprised of a core with 4 to 6 attached olden railroad passenger cars used as dining areas. The total building area with initially 7500 sqft and ultimately 9000 sqft. The structure is single story. Off-street parking accomodating 126 cars is provided. 9. Generally describe the property and existing improvements : Thepproperty is relatively level with the exception of a depression in the northwest quarter. 10. Total construction cost or fair market value of proposed project . including additional developments contemplated : $250,000.00 11 . Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested : Begin August 1974 End March 1975 - 3 - 12 . List any other permits for this project from state, federal , or other local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for , and if so , the date of the applica- tion , whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same , and the number of the application or permit: Date • Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status** City of Renton Special City of Renton • Site approval City of Renton Building * Leave blank if not submitted. ** Approved , denied or pending . 13 . Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the proposed project? ri yes x no If "yes" submit copy with this environmental impact worksheet. 14. Are there similar projects , both public and private , existing or planned in the immediate area : ,x yes I ' no don ' t know If "yes", explain . A commercial/office complex is being constructed to the west of this project across SR181 in the City of Tukwila. 15 . Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or structure having unique or. exceptional historic , cultural , or other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? x yes r1no • If "yes" explain . The proximity to the Green River is important in a regional context. Although the project is not adjacent to the river, the site may support river related flora and fauna. There are no other important characteristics. 16 . Is the proposed project located in an area that may be considered sensitive and is subject to erosion , landslides , floods , etc . ? yes I " 1 no " If "yes" explain . • - 4 - 17 . Is the proposed project located in an area that has a number of large trees or other natural landscaped areas , waterways ,. marshes or wildlife? x yes no If "yes" explain . There are five large trees on the site, see the attached site plan for location. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT : In the following questions summarize what the applicant feels will be the, environmental impact , both beneficial and adverse , of the proposed project. Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well as physical , social , and aesthetic aspect. For projects which are part of a more extensive plan , consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed. 18. Land Use :. Will the project have a significant effect on land use in the surrounding area? Ix lyes no Explain : The project is among the first commercial developments in the vicinity and will assuredly influence future land use. • 19. Project Design and Appearance : Will the project design , appear- ance , landscaping , etc. , assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? I ,xlyes Lino Explain : The use of materials and height will be scaled to the quasi-rural/natural feeling of the area. The four healthiest large trees will be retained as part of the 14% of the site devoted to parking screening, boundary buffer and entrance landscaping. 20. Ground Contours : Does the proposed project have an effect on. - the existing ground contours of the project location? Ix `yes jno . Is the project likely to cause erosion or sedimentation? r yes r—lno? If "yes" to either , explain . . The depression at the northwest quarter of the site will be filled to the approximate level of SR181 . • - 5 21 . Air Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? ' (Consider the effect of any gas , chemicals , smoke , dust , particulate matter , and odors) ? Ayes x no If "yes" explain . • 22 . Water Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project. ) Dyes ,[ lno. Is there a good possibility that this project will require `n expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities.? 1 yes x no If "yes" to either, exp ain . Surface water will be drained across the entire sight to the east and deposited into a continuous recharge drain.. Excess water will drain into an existing drainage ditch on Puget Power R/W. 23. Noise : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project significantly affect the existing noise levels of the area? ( yes Ix [ no . Will the project be affected by airports , freeways , railroads or other sources of noise? Dyes Fx—ino If "yes" to either , explain . 24. Population Density: Will a noticeable population change result from this, project? ( Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density. ) 1yes rx lno . Will the pro- ject cause periodic or temporary fluctuations in population due to tourism , employment , shopping , schools , etc . [ xlyes Elno . If "yes" to either, explain . . The local population will significantly increase at peak midday and early evening mealtime hours. There will be no significant changes at any other time. 6 - 25 . Effect on Population : Will the proposed action directly or in- directly cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? I 'yes lxlno If "yes" explain . 26 . Schools and Parks : Will the proposed project have an effect on schools and parks in the area? yes Ixlno If "yes " explain . 27 . Transportation : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? i-- Tix l yes I no Explain : • During peak restaurant hours the traffic patterns in the area will- be altered. The proposed widening of DR181 and the introduction of a 2-way left turn will alleviate any traffic problems. 28. Public Use : Will the project be available for use by all sectors of the public? Explain : Xlyes I Ino The decision to use the facility is the public's. The project will provide a needed service to the employees and residents of the region. 29. Other Impacts : Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project. The significant impacts have been discussed above. - 7 - 30. VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS : Have you made your. plans . known to interested community rou,ps - or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? yes no If "yes" what are their reactions? If "no" do you intend to contact these people?n yes []no • CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE The Owner/Representative identified in Item No. 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge . � . (bidCovvyvs FROJecr ARcutirc=Cr 6.20:74- Signature Title Date - 8 - TO BE FILLED IN 'BY CIT DEPARTMENTS • REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW ' BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: Comments : Signature of Director or Aut orize Representative ate • - 10 - ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL , A. Sta f review determined that project : Has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects . May have significant environmental impact and a complete environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant prior to further action on request for permit. B. Reasons for above conclusion : 1. PiZOKY.AL I C.WY p A MiiJoiz-- acrTiokJ w+r14 Nip L tJ+FtcAkrr 1MpA.LT . 2,. MO t.mure MAS v P Ptiroir.AL- VE(vE,-rA.rio..) ACe li&EI Libr- D+STJR.gap. 3 , MMJb OWTeiiJ Fi4L1LAr+ 5 'Fort- •ropp.i wATlft2..— RJ 1 fl iN AND' 011.011,4A cL 61p46.42 ok.). 4, LAopc( Apr p Ak.) M in S L. oP Nt Grer'i oN W41LE Ad•S0 pitASM2 i hszr Sm..4,Lr' b pi Ti4cLA -t s a,, -rµG st . p+.A.err- M AT 24a..s oowFogem -719 S. G. S, / C.I F.o LATi°kg> 10 ii 1C•14 p2CAWIC FEA.0 vhdp iiittir, rvico AAA? A41bc-rg- eiZZett,:49 Signatu of esponsible Official or Authorized Representative Date : —, 3') 7� Form; EIS-1 Planning Department ' October 15 , 1973 L r ' That port.ii of Govr.rnmcnt Tots 2 an, ' 1 and of Land Claim No . ALL in Henry Mendel I)onat.i.o11 3 North , Range Ez.st of Township 2 g ' Section 25 ,' W.M. , described as follows : , Commencing at the intersection of the centerline ' of West Valley Highway (State Road 181) t'i t.}1 the centerline of Strand ]rSB ofI C��t)•c1ofXtelit:'i.O.I1,d�s1�.. S1101�111 on S}lc-�.1.. � in of Stranclor. Rout evard Extension datecd August g „° Si ' .30" East along the 1972 ; thence South centerline of West VaileylHighwaythedisis _ace of 194 . 77 feet to the norte of 0 • feet in width of said Co•:erni+:cnt Lot 1.1 ; thence South 87 u . 1 ! ,- q" Last along said north :.i.tte _ l- �t� '• 4.0. 7E feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING on :the tin �" thence CiiS tC1'l ' margin of West Valley Highway ; t ei.cel�ay North 8h 51 '- 30" West. along said easterly margin 805 . 08 feet to the south line of the City. of Seattle ' s Bow Lake Pipe. Line right of way; thence South 87 0 13 ' 12" East along said south , right of w:!y line ?..73. ? 8 feet to the westerly line of a 300- foot right Cc�l many by'� deeds yed to Pul;ct • Sound Power FI Light � 2629432 under King County Auditor ' s .File Nos . and 2644020 ( former Puget Sound Electric Railwav • right of way) ; -thence South 1° 13 ' 21 " East . said westerly right of way line 791 . 76 feet to • the north Line of the south 210 feet in width of said Government Lot 11 ; tGe1155 Noferth t87°o h47 'e 19" • West along said north line POINT OF BEGl.NNING. . EXCEPT, that portion lying south of a line parallel with and distant 5 feet north, measured at right angles , from the following described line: Beginning -at the point of intersection of the south line of the Henry Meader Donation Claim No . 46 and the centerline cOf State te Si'�h2ay9" 11v81 (West Valley Highway) ; thfc • • a distance of 48 : 98 feet along said highway centerline ; thence S 85° 30 ' 26" E. 41 . 14 feet • to the easterly margin of said highway • and the T , TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing; ;: . o E. 227 . 7 e or less to - .':the =�; ,:�, .. � S S5 30 ' 26" 9 feet more ., , �•<<;...:. said Puget Sound Electric #P;f '; westerly margin of g `;. :�:='�•3�ar� Railway right of way . •� -f-. '^� SUBJECT TO a perpetual utility easement to the = w u- f,,"�.. recorded under King County / ; •; •, of Washington , �. yy L, State ,t o 11 TO �T±kl.�� n,:f'j?f_S•w Auditor' s File- No . 6525398 ; ALSO, SUBJECT ', y.;yµ' , �- . easements , reservations and restrictions of �� 41 accord. • ;<;7=_. s, s To- ,.t zti"s • 0 266 square feet , mord or les . 5 e, :;�� -;,- llrea• 8 t e constructed , '. get her with the building to :'7" ..�F,,:' y.. hereinafter provided '' Y n . r' thereon as 11C ;; " ', ./ - _�:, ( ; .(5 Pat% 1/1 ) CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET ; FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : 4tr�� Negative Dec . �'410 Application No . .�1��-a� 7s� 9 Date Received EIS INSTRUCTIONS : The purpose of this information is to assist the vari - ous departments of the City to determine whether an environmental impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per- mit for a proposed project . Single family residential uses. in non sensitive areas are exempt from this requirement as established by Washington Administrative Code 173-34 . In addition to the following information , please submit a vicinity map ( recommend scale : 1" representing 200 ' to 800 ' ) and a site map (rec- ommended scale : 1 " representing 10 ' to 40 ' ) . APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW: 1 . Name of applicant RICHARD BOUILLON & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS, 2 . Mailing address 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, Washington 98122 Telephone 325-2553 3 . Applicant is : fliOwne r I 1Lessee I !Contract purchaser [xJOther ( specify) Architect 4 . Name and address of owner , if other than applicant : BURLINGTON NORTHERN ATTENTION:. MR. RICHARD VINCENT 860 CENTRAL BUILDING, SEATTLE 98104 Telephone 624-1900 5 . General location of ' proposed. project ( give street address if any or nearest street and intersection EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY AT STRANDER BOULEVARD " 1 - 2 6 . Legal description ( if lengthy , attach as separate sheet) Attachment 7 . Area 80,266 sq.ft. Dimensions 8. Intended use of property or project ( include details : number of units , volume , etc . ) : The proposed project is a restaurant comprised of a core with 4 to 6 attached olden railroad passenger cars used as dining areas. The total building area with initially 7500 sqft and ultimately 9000 sqft. The structure is single story. Off-street parking accomodating 126 cars is provided. 9 . Generally describe the property and existing improvements : The property is relatively level with the exception of a depression in the northwest quarter. 10 . Total construction cost or fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated : $250,000.00 11 . Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested : Begin August 1974 End March 1975 . - 3 - 12 . List any other permits for this project from state , federal , or other local governmental agencies - for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for, and if so , the date of the applica- tion , whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same , and the number of the application or permit : Date Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status** City of Renton Special City of Renton Site approval City of Renton Building * Leave blank if not submitted . ** Approved , denied or pending . 13 . Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the proposed project? If "yes " submit copy with this yes rx--1 no environmental impact worksheet . 14. Are there similar projects , both public and private , existing or planned in the immediate area : [ yes l l no don ' t know If "yes " explain . A commercial/office complex is being constructed to the west of this project across SR181 in the City of Tukwila. 15 . Is the proposed project located in or adjacent to an area or structure having unique or exceptional historic , cultural , or other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? x yes fljno If "yes " explain . The proximity to the Green River is important in a regional context. Although the project is not adjacent to the river, the site may support river related flora and fauna. There are no other important characteristics. 16 . Is the proposed project located in an area that may be considered sensitive and is subject to erosion , landslides , floods , etc . ? lyes xlno If "yes " explain . , - 4 - 17 . Is the proposed project located i.n an area that has a number of ' large trees or other natural landscaped areas , waterways , marshes or wildlife? x yes no If "yes" explain . There are five large trees on the site, see the attached site plan for location. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT : In the following questions summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact , both beneficial and adverse , of the proposed project . Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well as physical , social , and aesthetic aspect . For projects which are part of a more extensive plan , consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed . 18. Land Use : Will the project have a significant effect on land use in the surrounding area? jx lyes lno Explain : The project is among the first commercial developments in the vicinity and will assuredly influence future land use. • 19 . Project Design and Appearance : Will the project design , appear- ance , landscaping , etc . , assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? x yes Lino Explain : The use of materials and height will be scaled to the quasi-rural/natural feeling of the area. The four healthiest large trees will be retained as part of the 14% of the site devoted to parking screening, boundary buffer and entrance landscaping. 20 . Ground Contours : Does the proposed project have .an effect on the existing ground contours of the project location? � x yes Lino . Is the project likely to, cause erosion or sedimentation? r—iyes "—' no? If "yes" to either , explain . The depression at the northwest quarter of the site 'will be filled to the approximate level of SR181 . . - 5 - 21 . ; Air Quality: . Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? (Consider the effect of any gas , chemicals , smoke , dust , particulate matter , and odors ) ? yes Rino If "yes " explain . 22 . Water Quality : Will construction of the project and use of the completed project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? ( Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project . ) L_J, yes x ,no . Is there a good possibility that this project will requir an expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities? I Iyes lx Ino If "yes" to either , explain . Surface water will be drained across the entire sight to the east and deposited into a continuous recharge drain. Excess water will drain into an existing drainage ditch on Puget Power R/W. 23 . Noise : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project significantly affect the existing noise levels of the area? Flyes jx lno . Will the project bee. affected by airports , freeways , railroads or other sources of noise? El yes •[ ino If "yes" to either , explain . 24 . Population Density : Will a noticeable population change result from this project? ( Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density . ) ] yes rx 1no . Will the pro- ject cause periodic or temporary fluctuations in opulation due to tourism , employment , shopping , schools , . etc . �xlyes inno . If "yes " to either , explain . The local population will significantly increase at peak midday and early evening mealtime hours. There will be no significant changes at any other time. • - 6 - 25 . Effect on Population : Will the proposed action directly or in- directly cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? yes x no If "yes " explain . 26 . Schools and Parks : Will the proposed project have an effect on schools and parks in the area? yes Jx no If "yes " explain . 27 . Transportation : - Will. constructionof the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? If yes Ti no Explain : During peak restaurant hours the traffic patterns in the area will be altered. The proposed widening of DR181 and the introduction ,of a 2-way left turn will alleviate any traffic problems. 28 . Public Use : Will the project be available for use by all sectors of the public? xl yes no Explain : The decision to use the facility is the public's. The project will provide - a needed service to the employees and residents of the region. 29 . Other Impacts : Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project. The significant impacts have been discussed above. ' - _ 7 30 . VIEWS. OF' LOCAL GROUPS : • Have you made your plans known to interested community coups or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? yes Jno If "yes" what are their reactions? If "no" do you intend to contact these people?, yes [Xjno CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE The Owner/Representative identified in Item No . 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge . uo; lcoorAz ff ,JecT Apc.40T:cr 6 Signature. Title Date - TO "BE FILLED IN BY CITY'. DEPARTMENTS REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 0 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : - Department : ' Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative ' Date - 9 - REVIEW BY' OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date } - 10 - . ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL A. Staff review determined that project : Has no significant environmental impact and application . should be processed without further consideration of environmental effects . May have significant environmental impact and a complete environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant prior to further action on request for permit. B . Reasons for above conclusion : • Signature of "Responsible Official or Authorized Representative Date : Form : EIS-1. Planning Department October 15 , 197.3 .. . . • _ . . . . . . . . _ . • . -. . . . - '.• --' ,1' - ' • That port , of GovernMent Lots, 2 a,:- 11 of - - -. _ . .7: • -' Henry Meader Donation- Land. Claim No 6 ; AlALL. in . . . - . Section 25 , Township 23. North, • Range 4 Est of._,i - -• 11.140 , described as followS :, ' . .• . . . . . • • - . : ' ' . • Commencinu at the - Intersection of the ceLterline • , : -. .0 of West 'Valley Highway (State Road with the , , . . centerline of Strand or Boulevard Extension , as •, . .,. . shown on Sheets 4 and S of City of TukwiTh draw- .. ing of Strander. Boulevard EXtCn5iOn dated August , 1972 ; thchcc, south 80 :)1, ' 30" East along the , centerline of West Valley Highway a distz.nce of 194 . 77 feet to the north line of the souTh 210 _ - feet in width of said Government Lot 11 ; thence • South 87° 47 ' 19" Last along said north ".i.ne _ 40. 76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING on the easterly margin. of West Valley -Highway ; thence North S" 51 ' 30" West along said easterly highway margin 808 . 08 feet to the south line of the City ' • . . of Seattle ' s Dow Lahe Pipe Line right of way ; • thence South 870 13 ' 12" East along said south right of way line 273. 28 feet to thee westerly • line of a 100- foot right of way conveyed to Puget Sound Power fi Light Company by deeds recorded • . under King County Auditor ' s File Nos .- 2629432 and 2644020 ( former Puget Sound Electric Railway . right of way) ; thence South Jo 13 ' 21 " East along • .. . . said westerly right of way line 791 . 76 feet to the north line of the south 210 feet in width' of said Government Lot 11 ; thence North 87' 47 ° 19" • West along said north line 165 . 55fcet to the . POINT OF BEGINNING . . . . • EXCEPT , that portion lying south of ,a line ... parallel with and distant 5 feet north , measured at right angles , from the following described line: . . • . . . . • Beginning -at thc point of intersection of the • .. • . . . . . • south line of the Henry Meader Donation Claim • No . 46 and the centerline Of State Highway 181 . • .. . (West Valley Highway) ; -thence N 8° 52 ' 29" W. . . • • a distance of 48 : 98 f(!ot along said hif,hway centerline ; thence S f- S° 30 ' 26" E 41 . 14 feet • to the eaF,torly margin of said highway and the • . • . - .. . TRW POINT OF DEGINNING ;• thence continuing • S 85° 30 ' 26" E. 227 . 79 feet more or less to the . . . westerly margin of said Puget Sound Electric . . right of way Railway . , . , . SUBJECT TO a , perpetual utility easement to the .? ..4....-.t . .-e::••,,,,,-.- •.,- . . • 'n,'o,,,,,,-,,,, State- of Washington , - recorded undei- King County' Auditor ' s File No . 6525398 ; ALSO, SUBJECT TQ ' ' -_-,-',-.;„,,'....7:,,,,,,•,,,,-o-,, • ------ • casefient , reserVations and restrictions of ; :-;y: -.:-,'-A,‘-•••.-i•;;,,, record. . . _ •... . . . i:.-:--o,.,:- .4=.!:- • • ,,j,,, ,,.. .4!_, , . . . . . . . . . •. . . . , , . .. . . . ::-.,• :-:,--.F..;e,,,,,,,. . - Arca: 80 , 266 - square feet, more or less . To- - • *.:,=---,::.r . . 4,--',.•:• :-.-,-,•':;,.-:,.•• •.; gether with the building to be constrUctcd . . • . f•--;•-P-',: .1-.-!=.:: . . thereon as hereinafter Provided. • . . . . . . . . .. _ .„. . . . . . • ;.--;:.9...T..:,.-.J.,,tg•,•,: . . . . - ,;7:%;_sr•i.A,A . . . . . . . A RE/VCITY OF RENTONCEIVED �� APPLICATION" FOR SPECIAL PERMIT . JUL 3 1s74. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY .. 9 �� File No . SP- �-7 �- 7/ 5i Fee $25. 00 ���NG ET:Se �. Date Rec'd 9_�_7jl Receipt No. -3p©2, APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 6 : GLACIER PARK COMPANY 1 . Name BURLINGTON NORTHERN Attn: Mr. R. Vincent Phone 624-1900 Ext. 2487 Address 600 Central Building, Seattle,' Washington 98104 2. Property location West Valley Highway at Strander Boulevard 3. Legal description (attach additional sheet if necessary) See attached sheet 4 . Number of acres or sq. ft. 80,266 sq.ft. Present zoning M-P 5. What do you propose to develop on this property? A restaurant. Single story. .Area' = 9000 sq.ft. 6. The following information shall be submitted with this application: Scale A. Site and access plan (include setbacks , existing structures,. easements , and other factors limiting development) 1" = 10 ' or 20 ' B. Parking, landscaping and screening plan . .1" = 10 ' C. Vicinity map (include land use and zoning on adjacent parcels) .1" = 200 '. - 800 ' D. Building height and area. (existing and proposed) E . A special permit required by the Renton Mining, Excavation and Grading Ordinance shall submit the information listed in Section 4.-2307. 5 in addition to the above , 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:- Date approved . Date denied Date appealed Appeal action • Remarks Planning Dept . 2-73 revised 1/74 • That porti.o'h of Government Lots 2 anc __ 1 and of . • ' - Henry Meader Donation Land Claim No . 46 , ALL in Section 25 , Township 23 North , Range 4 E<.st of • • • W.M. , described as follows : Commencing at the intersection of the centerline of West Valley Highway (State Road 181) vit.li the centerline of Strandcr Boulevard. Extensi.()n , as • shown on Sheets 4 and 5 of City of Tukwi:.a draw•• ing of Strander, Boulevard Extension dated August , 19 ]2 ; thence South 8° Si ' 30" East along the centerline of West Valley Highway a distacc of 194 . 77 feet to the north line of the sou•_}i 210 feet in width of said Government. Lot 1.1 ; thence • South 87° . 47 ' 19" East along said north :.inc 40 . 76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING on the easterly margin of West Valley highway ; thence North 051 ' ;�30" .Nest along said easterly highway margin 808 . 08 feet to the south line of the City • of Seattle ' s Bow Lal:c Pipe Line right of way; thence South 87° 13 ' 12" East: along said south right of way line 77328 feet to the westerly line of a 100- foot. right of way conveyed to Puget Sound Power £, Light. Company by deeds recorded. • 'C°1-04v alder King County Auditor ' s File Nos . 2629432 0 , c id 2644020 (former Puget Sound Electric Railw ay ,`?t \� � li. ;}it of way) ; thence South 1° 13 ' 21 " East along ' ., s s1t d westerly right: of way line 791 . 76 feet to `3 north line of the south 210 feet in width I-- 3��= said Government Lot 11 ; thence ;forth 87° 47 ' 19" /R' .st along sai ci north line 165 . 55 feet to the O OINT OF BEGINNING . 7' • i-A N NVAC1 . . EXCEPT , that portion lying south of a line • • parallel with and distant 5 feet north , measured • • at right angles , from the following described • line: • Beginning -at the point of intersection of the . south line of the Henry Meader Donation Claim No . 46 and the centerline Of State Highway 181 (West Valley Highway) ;; thence N 8° 52 ' 29" W. : • • a distance of 48 . 98 feet along said highway centerline ; thence S 85° 30 ' 26" E. 41 . 14 feet . to the easterly margin of said highway • and the • TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ; thence continuing • S 85° 30 ' 26" E. 227 . 79 feet more or less to the westerly margin of said Puget Sound Electric Railway right of way . SUBJECT TO a perpetual utility easement to the : , ;:`r_' ,`, • State of Washington , recorded under King County _ Auditor ' s ' File No . 6525398 ; ALSO , SUBJECT TO ,----- . easements , reservations and restrictions of • record . . Arca : 80 , 266 square feet , more or less . o- £ether with the building to be constructed thereon ashereinafter provided - - -.,,-• , • • • AFFIDAVIT • I , Richard L. Vincent , being duly sworn, declare that I am/the owner orthe property involved in this application and that the foreaf .aj gatements and answers herein contained and the information - herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge' and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this 27thday of June , 19 711 Notary Public in and for the- State of • Washin ton, residing at Seattle • r. /I Cf t� Name of Notary Pu a.c ( ignature Owner) Glacier Park•Coscpany c/o Burlington Northern a / ? ia— • 600 Central Building Address • (Address Seattle, Wa. 98104 `' (City) (State) • • • 624-1900 ext 2I.87 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE' ONLY) • • CERTIFICATION • This is to certify that the foregoing application has. been inspected by me and has been foun - o Few borough and complete in every particular and to conform to the as � nI4'e ulations of the Renton Planning Department • rg governing the ia41,o, teudh pplication. `1,2Date Received ''.�`m 3 1E4 , 19 B y: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 �EC�h�EDo CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON (MI ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT WORKSHEET 1 ,6' 3 1974 �9 doe A, FOR OFFICE USE ONLY : '��\\ �+ Application No . ,Eiw-a‘-7 Negative Dec . Date Received 7-03 -7"/ EIS INSTRUCTIONS : The purpose of this information is to assist the vari - ous departments of the City to determine whether an environmental impact statement will be required before approving and issuing a per- mit for a proposed project . Single family residential uses in non sensitive areas are exempt from this requirement as established by Washington Administrative Code 173-34. In addition to the following information , please submit a vicinity map ( recommend scale : 1" representing 200 ' to 800 ' ) and a site map (rec- ommended scale : 1" representing 10 ' to 40 ' ) . APPLICANT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITEMS 1 THROUGH 30 BELOW : 1 . Name of applicant RICHARD BOUILLON & ASSOCIATES/ARCHITECTS 2 . Mailing address 130 Lakeside, Suite F Seattle, Washington 98122 Telephone 325-2553 3. Applicant is : C 'Owner (Lessee I [Contract purchaser rxlOther ( specify) Architect 4 . Name and address of owner , if other than applicant : BURLINGTON NORTHERN ATTENTION: MR. RICHARD VINCENT 860 CENTRAL BUILDING, SEATTLE 98104 Telephone 624-1900 5 . General location of ' proposed. project (give street address if any or nearest street and intersection EAST SIDE OF WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY..AT STRANDER BOULEVARD R , . } _ 2 _ 1 6 . Legal description (if lengthy , attach as separate sheet) Attachment 7 . Area 80,266 sq.ft. Dimensions 8. Intended use of property or project ( include details : number of units , volume , etc . ) : The proposed project is a restaurant comprised of a core with 4 to 6 attached olden railroad passenger cars used as dining areas. The total building area with initially 7500 sqft and ultimately 9000 sqft. The structure is single story. Off-street parking accomodating 126 cars is provided. 9. Generally describe the property and existing improvements : The ;property is relatively level with the exception of a depression in the northwest quarter. 10 . Total construction cost or fair market value of proposed project including additional developments contemplated : $250,000.00 11 . Construction dates (month and year) for which permit is requested : Begin August 1974 End March 1975 3 12 . List any other permits for this project from state , federal , or other local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply , including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for , and if so , the date of the applica- tion , whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same , and the number of the application or permit : Date Agency Permit Type Submitted* Number Status** City of Renton Special City of Renton Site approval City of Renton Building * Leave blank if not submitted . ** Approved , denied or pending . 13 . Has an Environmental Impact Statement or an Environmental Assess- ment been prepared for the proposed project? If "yes " submit copy with this � yes �lno environmental impact worksheet . 14. Are there similar projects , both public and private , existing or planned in the immediate area : Ix I yes I 1 no don ' t know t If "yes " explains. A commercial/office complex is being constructed to the west of this project across SR181 in the City of Tukwila. 15 . Is the propose.d project located in or adjacent to an area or structure having unique or exceptional historic , cultural , or other values considered important by some sectors of the popu- lation? x yes Elno If "yes " explain . The proximity to the Green River is important in a regional context. Although the project is not adjacent to the river, the site may support river related flora and fauna. There are no other important characteristics. 16 .• Is the proposed project located in •an area that may be considered sensitive and is subject to erosion , landslides , floods , etc . ? lyes lx �. n10 If "yes ". explain . - 4 - 17 . Is the proposed project located in an area that has a number of large trees Or other natural landscaped areas , waterways , marshes or wildlife? Ixlyes no If "yes" explain . There are five large trees on the site, see the attached site plan for location. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF PROPOSED PROJECT : In the following questions summarize what the applicant feels will be the environmental impact , both beneficial and adverse , of the proposed project . Consideration should be given to both the human and natural environmental as well as physical , social , and aesthetic aspect . For projects which are part of a more extensive plan , consider the implications of the entire plan and not just the project now being proposed . 18. Land Use : Will the project have a significant effect on land use in the surrounding area? Jxlyes Ino Explain : The project is among the first commercial developments in the vicinity and will assuredly influence future land use. • 19 . Project Design and Appearance : Will the project design , appear- ance , landscaping , etc . , assure the maximum protection for the natural environment? Oyes LIno Explain : The use of materials and height will be scaled to the quasi-rural/natural feeling of the area. The four healthiest large trees will be retained as part of the 14% of the site devoted to parking screening, boundary buffer and entrance landscaping. 20. Ground Contours : Does the proposed project have an effect on the existing ground contours of the project location? Ix 'yes Lino . Is the project likely to cause erosion or sedimentation? lyes • no? If "yes " to either , explain . The depression at the northwest quarter of the site will be filled to the approximate level of SR181 . - 5 - • 21 . Air Quality: , Will construction of the project and use of the completed project have a substantial effect on the existing air quality? (Consider. the effect of any gas , chemicals , smoke , dust , particulate matter , and odors ) ? l [yes I xlno If "yes " explain . 22 . Water Quality: Will construction of the project and use of the completed project be likely to have an effect on the existing water quality of the area? (Consider the adequacy of drainage and runoff and the likely endpoint of any liquids draining from the project. ) nyes x no . Is there a good possibility that this project will requirg___an expansion of local water and/or sewer facilities? Il yes xInc If "yes" to either , explain . Surface water will be drained across the entire sight to the east and deposited into a continuous recharge drain. Excess water will drain into an existing drainage ditch on Puget Power R/W. 23 . Noise : Will construction of the project or use of the completed project significantly affect the existing noise levels of the area? (-dyes Will the project be. affected by airpolts , freeways , railroads or other sources of noise? [ 1 yes [x ( no If "yes" to either , explain . • 24 . Population Density : Will a noticeable population change result from this project? ( Consider the present density per acre in the surrounding community to the proposed density of the project and including daytime density. ) flyes [Tina . Will the pro- ject cause periodic or temporary fluctuations in population due to tourism , employment , shopping , schools , etc . ( xlyes (—ono . If "yes" to either , explain . The local population will significantly increase at peak midday and early evening mealtime hours. There will be no significant changes at any other time. - 6 - 25 . Effect on Population : Will the proposed action directly or in- direct1y cause the relocation of a sizeable number of persons or the division or disruption of existing community patterns of liv- ing? yes x no If "yes" explain . 26 . Schools and Parks : Will the proposed project have an effect on schools and parks in the area? yes lx no If "yes " explain . 27 . Transportation : Will. construction of the project or use of the completed project have a significant impact on transportation in the area? xJyes nno Explain : During peak restaurant hours- the traffic patterns in the area will be altered. The -proposed widening of DR181 and the introduction ,of a 2-way left turn w911 alleviate any traffic problems. 28. Public Use : Will the project be available for use by all sectors of the public? � xl yes [—I no Explain : The decision to use the facility is the public's. The project will provide a needed service to the employees and residents of the region. 29 . Other Impacts : Identify any other beneficial or adverse environ- mental impacts which may result from the construction or comple- tion of the proposed project . The significant impacts have been discussed above. 30 . VIEWS OF LOCAL GROUPS : ' Have you made your plans known to interested community coups or neighbors in the vicinity of the project? yes no If "yes" what are their reactions? If "no" do you intend to contact these people?[ yes [XJno CERTIFICATION BY OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE The Owner/Representative identified in Item No . 1 or 4 above hereby certifies that the information furnished in this Environmental Work- sheet is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge . Covens FRaietr Signature. Title Date 8 TO BE FILLED IN BY CITY DEPARTMENTS REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ZLG_ Comments : LCchgt 14.4TaMAL TYPE LiE6P r,oA/ 1Al L.porb Sc.APIN b 74.016+1 E.A a cMrsiv car Aa Y 11dn' .a.T: WE SEE N a S,444•ice csaArr ®a,P ,c. e Si ure of Direc or or Authori d Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : _ /i7 G2 � ;j v Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date - 10 - • ACTION BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL A. Staff review determined that project : Has no significant environmental impact and application should be. processed without further consideration of environmental effects . May have significant environmental impact and a complete environmental assessment should be prepared by applicant prior to further action on request for permit . B . ` Reasons for above conclusion : Signature. of Responsible Official or Authorized Representative Date : Form: EIS-1 Planning Department October 15 , 1973 - 9 - REVIEW Br OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date '••'. ••. ' . • . . , . . .. • . ' • . . , . . . That portion of Governf:ient .Lots. 2 al 171 and .o.ff,,,. • - - • Henry Neader Donation Land Claim No- ' 16 ; ALL iii - - I • ... . Section- 25 , • Township 23 North , Range 4 Ez..st of ,. ! . • ! W.M. , described : as fellows : . . • . • h • . • - . . . , . Commencino at the intersection of the centerline .,.-, . . of WestsVolley Highway, (State Road 181) vith the • .. • - centerline of Strander Boulevard Extension , as . . , . shown on Sheets 4- and S of City of TukwiTh draw- . . ing of Strander ilOLOCV:Ird EXtC1151011 dated August , - . . 1972 ; thence South 8° Si. ' 30" East along the . . • centerline of West Valley Highway a distz,nce of . • 194 . 77 feet to the north line of the souTh 210 _ . feet in- width of said Government Lot 11 ; thence • South 87° 47 ' 19" East along said north :ine - - • 40 . 76 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING on thc . . easterly mnrgin of West Valley Highway ; thence North Sh 51 ' 30" -West along said easterly highway margin 806 . 08 feet to the south line of the City- - ,. • - - of Seattle ' s Bow Lake Pipe Line right of way ; thence South 870- 13 ' 12" East along said south . right of way line 273, 28 feet to the westerly . • . . line of a 100- foot right of way conveyed to Puget - . Sound Power fi Light: Company by deeds recorded • under King County Auditor ' s File Nos . 2629132 • , and 2641020 ( former Puget Sound Electric Railway • right of way) ; thence South 1° 13 ' 24 " East along • . . • • . said westerly right of way line 791 . 76 feet to the north linc of the south 210 feet in width • of said Government Lot 11 ; thence North 870 47 ' 19" • West along said north line 165 . 55 feet to the . POINT OF BEGINNING . ' • . . . ' EXCEPT , that portion lying south of ta line parallel with and distant 5 feet north , measured at right angles , from the followingdescribcd , . • , line: - . . . • • Beginning at the point: of intersection of the • . south line of the Henry Meader Donation Claim No . 16 and the centerline of State Hii:hway 181 . . ' (West Valley Highway) ; thence N 8° 52.' 29" W. . . . • a distance of 4898 fuot along said hihway centerline ; thence S t:5° 30 ' 2-6" E . 41 . 14 feet • to the easterly margin of said higilwayand the • • • TRUE POINT . OF BEGINNiNG ;. thence continuing • ---...- . . . '.- - S 85° 30 ' 26" E--. 227 . 79 feet more or less' to the .. . ,...• :.., westerly margin' of said Puget Sound Electric . - ..... . • Railway right of way . . , •• • ...-., • • .- .„ • „— . , • , . . . SUBJEC.1- -TO a , perpetual utility casement to the • • State of Washington , corded underKing County - - • • . - -_ Audtor' s File No . 6525398 ; ALSO, SUBJECT TO • . :: :...,.7,..,1.1.,-., .:-. . . easeifents ,.. reserVations .and restrictions of • t:-.„--,,,•,..,::17,6:.;,,, • •.. — . F41:.f.;;"; record-. — • . . - . ' :I.,'l''•ll',',;''' '..;-4....,5 . . t.,—•',-:—`!.:j1A;...,,::.,!".:;'s . , . . . • . . — • , '..r-1:-.:' ,2 '7. . . . . Area 80 ,166 square feet , more or less . To-. • - - .. . , . • gether .with the building to he constructed . ' .. .. . . - : , : -. - -.: • -- thereon -as hereinafter provided. . - • . _. -. - - • • . . . . . . . . . qt,..;:;.;,:-;;17,, ,:,':•:;•;-:h . . . . . • . . - - ..--,,_••=:1,,,-,c ROUTE SC1111)IlLE PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED 7///g PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR; e:N4taoµ 'a4� 1MPAce REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT 1'LA'l' SPECIAL PERMIT 0e, PILL, C�c (,402... Qom. WAIVER SHORELINE' MANAGEMENT p PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO TILE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE, BEFORE 71/7 SIGNATURE OR INITIAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL 1111'1'1: . .. rnor"- • G m 1 11� AT ENCINEERIN FIRE • HEALTH REVIEWER'S COMMENTS OR APPROVAL CONDITIONS : • 1 Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 24 , 1974 Page Nine will eventually be phased out , when the Glacier Park property to the west is developed . Responding to Ross , Office Engineer Touma indicated that the site will be reviewed for adequate storm drainage control and noted that the proposed access is adequate . Landscaping plans were discussed , and it was noted that the site is six feet below the existing railroad bed . Responding to Mola , the Planning Director indicated that the applicant has received a flood control permit from King County Hydraulics . Answering a query by Scholes , Mr . Phil Wood , Puget Sound Power and Light Company , stated that they have requested a permit to cross over the Chicago Milwaukee Railroad Company tracks . Assistant Planner Smith noted that the Company has the right to cross the railroad at the temporary access point .at this time and that it is planned to use the temporary access until an agreement is worked out for permanent crossing . Further discussion ensued regarding adequacy of landscaping , especially as it affects plans for fencing . Responding to Scholes , Assistant Planner Smith described heights of planned structures and towers . Following further discussion , IT WAS MOVED BY ROSS , SECONDED BY MORRISON , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE SPECIAL PERMIT REQUEST OF PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED . ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY MORRISON, THAT THE PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY REQUEST TO FILL AND GRADE BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO STAFF APPROVAL OF EROSION CONTROL METHODS ON ALL SLOPES AND APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPE PLAN LABELED EXHIBIT B . MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Chairman called for further comment on the site approval : request from the audience . Court Ashley , Puget Sound Power and Light , stated that this is planned to be a termination station , with no transformer. Responding to Scholes , he indicated that the substation is necessary to provide alternate service to South Center and that general industrial area in case of power failure. Following discussion , IT WAS MOVED BY MORRISON , SECONDED BY ROSS , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE SITE APPROVAL PROPOSAL BY PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED . ACTION: MOVED BY SEYMOUR, SECONDED BY MOLA , TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN FOR PUGET SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOW- ING CONDITIONS: 1 . STAFF APPROVAL OF FINAL LANDSCAPING PLANS INCLUDING THE REQUEST THAT STAFF APPROVAL OF FINAL LANDSCAP- ING PLANS GIVE SPECIAL CONSIDERATION TO A SITE OBSCURING FENCE. 2. POSTING OF PERFORMANCE BOND FOR 150% INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD. G/li L C N / .? A 6>=,e /G/ Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 24 , 1974 Page Ten 3 . PAVING OF THAT PORTION OF THE TEN FOOT PERMA- NENT ACCESS EASEMENT CROSSING GLACIER PARK PROPERTY TO THE WEST AT SUCH TIME THAT PROPERTY IS FULLY DEVELOPED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Commission Mola inquired about the landscaping of the Puget Sound Power and Light transformer on the East Valley Highway. He recommended that the Company consider updating their beautification program, as long range plans for the area indicate M/P zoning . Commissioner Seymour indicated her agreement with the recommendation . SPECIAL PERMIT - SITE APPROVAL D. GLACIER PARK CO . ; Appl . No . SP-784-74; special permit to allow filling and grading in M-P zone; property located on east side of West. Valley Highway at inter- section. with Strander Blvd . A presentation was requested of the Planning Director by the Chairman , who advised the Commission that the appli - cant is requesting a special permit to allow filling and grading and approval of a site plan proposal for a res- taurant facility. ' SPECIAL PERMIT Mr. Ericksen pointed out the location of the 1 . 8 acre site on the vicinity map and advised that approximately 3400 cubic yards of fill are proposed . Proposal is to fill a low area and regrade the site for development of a new restaurant facility. He stated that it is the opinion of I the staff that it is a minor action with insignificant environmental impact . Areas to be filled and regraded were noted on the topographical map . • SITE APPROVAL The Planning Director described the restaurant facility and reviewed the site plan . The feasibility of retaining mature trees on the site has been discussed with the appli - cant. The landscape plan meets the M-P ordinance and Soil Conservation Service requirements . A flood control permit will be required. from the King County Department of Hydrau- lics , and an oil -water separator will be required for the parking areas . Discussion ensued regarding landscaping and parking plans . It was noted by Seymour that 126 parking spaces were pro- vided , while only 91 were required . It was suggested that the excess parking could be utilized for landscaping . The Chairman invited comment from the audience but received no response. Following discussion , IT WAS MOVED BY GIBSON , SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING GLACIER PARK COM- PANY ' S REQUEST TO FILL AND GRADE BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED . ACTION: MOVED BY SCHOLES, SECONDED BY GIBSON, THAT THE REQUEST FOR FILLING AND GRADING BE GRANTED TO THE GLACIER PARK COMPANY SUBJECT TO PROVISION FOR EROSION CONTROL AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION. MOTION CARRIED. Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 24 , 1974 Page Twelve B. COMMITTEE REPORTS The Chairman called for committee reports . 1 . COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. - APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL Chairman Scholes advised that Milwaukee Railroad has asked the Commission to expedite considera- tion of their request to fill and has amended their application to seek approval initially of a portion of Phase I of their original proposal to fill . Scholes advised that the request was made to take advantage of free fill material that had been made available. Scholes read a letter from Mil - waukee Railroad , which confirmed the amended appli - cation and agreed to a width restriction of approxi - mately one hundred feet in width for the fill extending longitudinally parallel to the present fill and limited to clear the forested area . Scholes identified Phase I and Phase II on the section map. The Community Services Committee Chairman described the proposed ultimate plan , presently under study by Wilsey and Ham Consult- ants . He noted that the applicant has requested that initial phases of fill be permitted , pending ' completion of the total plan . He advised that a committee meeting had been held with the appli - cant , consultants , and staff. The Planning Director advised the Commission that the Chicago, Milwaukee application had been con- tinued to allow for preparation of an environmental assessment. He noted that the document had been received and reviewed. On the basis of the review, it was determined that partial filling - a portion of Phase I — would have an insignificant effect, and a negative declaration of impact would be in order. He emphasized that any additional develop- ' ment in the area would require an environmental impact statement. Discussion followed regarding appropriateness of considering action on the amended request at this time . Mr . Paul Scott , Western Director of Real Estate and Industrial Development , Milwaukee Road , noted the reasons for their request. Mr. H . E. Hurst , Engineering Assistant to the General Manager , Milwaukee Road , noted that the request involves only the initial phase and asked for favorable action . Ross expressed his support of filling in some instances , stating it sometimes cleans up a "rag-tag" appearance . , 1 Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 24 , 1974 Page Eleven `Discussion continued on the site approval proposal . Respond- ing to Ross , Office Engineer Touma indicated that the Public Works Department does not anticipate any conflict between the access to the Puget Sound Power and Light facility previously considered which is adjacent to the property and the curb cuts . Also considered were possible problems of ingress and egress due to traffic speeds on access road . Assistant Planner Smith noted plans with the State Highway Department and coordination between developers of this property and that across the street . Then it WAS MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY ROSS , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON GLACIER PARK COMPANY ' S SITE APPROVAL REQUEST BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED . ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR, THAT THE SITE APPROVAL REQUEST OF GLACIER PARK COMPANY BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: 1 . STAFF APPROVAL OF FINAL LANDSCAPE PLANS WITH THE RETEN- TION OF AS MANY OF THE EXISTING TREES AS POSSIBLE. 2. CITY APPROVAL OF FINAL DRAINAGE PLAN INCLUDING SUFFI- CIENT STORM WATER RETENTION AND OIL/WATER SEPARATION CAPABILITIES AS IS NECESSARY AND ACCEPTABLE BY KING COUNTY HYDRAULICS DEPARTMENT, CITY OF RENTON ENGINEER- ING DEPARTMENT, AND CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. 3 . APPROVAL OF A STATE FLOODPLAIN PERMIT THROUGH THE KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HYDRAULICS . 4 . APPROVAL BY STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF ACCESS PLAN. 5. POSTING OF PERFORMANCE BOND FOR 150% INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE FOR A THREE YEAR PERIOD. Concern was again expressed relative to the amount of paving versus landscaping , and it was noted that it was expected that additional parking would be required to serve the public ade- quately . Discussion also pertained to the possibility of widening the driveways at both ends due to the landscaping and speed of traffic on the West Valley Highway . The Planning Director stated that in view of the concern of the Commission , the staff and affected City departments would review these items . On the question , MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5- ADMINISTRATIVE : A. OPEN SPACE APPLICATION - G . T. MC DANIEL ; Appl . OSC-777-74 ; property located in the May Creek Basin , approximately between N . E. 31st and the- Old Pacific Coast Railroad Right- of-Way. The Chairman noted that the reason the application was on the agenda was to establish a public hearing date . He recommended early September in order to allow for action within the time limit set by law. ACTION: MOVED BY ROSS, SECONDED BY SEYMOUR , THAT THE OPEN SPACE APPLI- CATION HEARING FOR G. T. MC DANIEL BE SET FOR SEPTEMBER 11 , 1974 . MOTION CARRIED. Staff Report July 24 , 1974 Page Four APPLICATION : SPECIAL PERMIT (FILL ) APPLICANT : GLACIER PARK COMPANY LOCATION : On east side of West Valley Highway approximately 200 feet north of Strander Boulevard Bridge . ZONING : M-P APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE MINING , 4-2302 ; 4-2305 ; 4-2306 ; 4-2307 EXCAVATION & GRADING ORD. : REQUEST : Applicant requests Special Permit from Planning Commission to fill the subject site . COMMENTS : 1 . Approximate volume of fill = 2800 cubic yards . Approximate volume of related cuts = 600 cubic yards . 2 . Subject site lies just north of the proposed 10 foot Puget Power access road or approximately 60 feet north of the south line of the Henry Meader Donation Claim 46 . 3 . Proposed fill is considered to be a minor activity having no significant impact on the environment. 4 . Proposal will require a State Floodplain Permit through King County Department of Hydraulics . RECOMMENDA- Recommend approval with staff approval of TION : provisions for erosion control and sedimentation control during construction . APPLICATION : SITE APPROVAL IN A M-P ZONE APPLICANT : GLACIER PARK COMPANY LOCATION : On east side of West Valley Highway approximately 500 feet north of Strander Boulevard Bridge . ZONING : M-P APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF 4-730 ; Chapter 22 , Parking and Loading THE ZONING CODE : REQUEST: Applicant requests approval from the Planning Commission of plans for a restaurant facility in a M-P Zone . COMMENTS : 1 . Parking required = 91 spaces Parking provided = 126 spaces 2 . The landscape plan as revised meets staff approval and S . C . S . requirements , the possibility of saving additional trees will be investigated . . 61acl07 • • • • • • Paget .Record-Chronicle Sunday;July 14, 119/4 • Public Notices . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING : • RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON,WASHINGTON ' A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE . HELD BY THE RENTON PLAN- NING COMMISSION AT ITS REGU- LAR' MEETING IN THE COUNCIL • CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 24, 1974, AT 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE .FOLLOWING'PETITIONS:•. APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT"APPROVAL;.file no. FP- '. 770-74; property located on • N.E. 16th St.,and•Kennewick • Ave.N.E. REZONE'FROM'G9600 TO • • • B-1; file No': R-778-74; proper • - ty located on 'Jones Ave. N.E. south of the Production Co. and Weichmann Enterprises. • SPECIAL PERMIT TO CON STRUCT A PETROLEUM MAR- KETING PLANT IN H-1 ZONE; • file 'No. SP-734-73; property located approx• 1 mile west of East Valley Highway, midway ' between Olympic Pipe Line - Mobil Oil site and Longacres Race'Track. ' SPECIAL PERMIT 'TO AL • - ,LOW FILLING AND GRADING IN G ZONE; file No.SP-780-74; property located 150' north of - Strander Blvd. bridge and 450' • east:,of West Valley Highway and S.W. of Longacres Race Track. SPECIAL PERMIT. TO AL- LOW' FILLING AND GRADING IN M-P ZONE; file No. SP-784- 74; property located on east side of West Valley Highway approx. 150' north of Strander .; Blvd. •. SITE APPROVAL ' FOR' OVERHEAD TO UNDER- .: • GROUND ELECTRIC TRANS- MISSION TERMINAL STATION; file No•' SA-781-.74;' property • located 150',south of Strander • Blvd. bridge' and 450' east of West Valley Highway'and S,W. of Longacres Race Track..,• ' SITE APPRVOAL fOR RES•,•; , ' ' TAURANT FACILITY; file• No.' . • • SA-785-74; property'located on east side of,West Valley High • way approx.:150';;north of • Strander Blvd. - : • Legal descriptions .of.•all' 1 applications on filein Planping., • Department office. . ' • ALL PERSONS INTERESTED OF•' OBJECTING.TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING •,COMMISSION.i-' MEETING ON July 24, 1974 AT 8: 00 'P.M. 'TO VOICE THEIR PRO . TESTS QR OBJECTIONS TO SAME. - PUBLISHED July 14, 1974. Bylund V.Wik, • SECRETARY RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION • CERTIFICATION • I, Michael L. Smith, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CON- ' • SPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROP-.,, • ERTY' DESCRIBED ABOVE'•AS,?: PRESCRIBED BY LAW, ATTEST:Subscyibed and sworn to°,' . before me, a'(Votary Public, on • the 11 day of July, 1974. ° Harriet M. Hilder SIGNED Michael L.Smith • 4 Published In the Renton Re- • cord Chronicle July 14, 1974. ' R2841• 1 .. 1 • . • •';,,' '",'!', 'i'-'.',''.'•"J„" •t;' .s. .,,.•...,.:•,.x..,..0 r:ii.,:;,-,..:-.,i- ,„...t,f.,mt.;,,,o....:0,,,D4,,:v.,,,c,,, i . ''' . .-' , "`,''','''.... ..:;,,:f,.',;g.....ac,,i.;1,d..ti...;',;.?,v44,1','.'i0.,'`,.TO.::,,,',:.;.-,:•;';'1,;',',.';-,11'.':;"-IV':igt.'e. ,1'.'''',.PP,',3,.-',I;;,.,'''.'.' A'ff..;.,;,,,,,,,,,ii. i ; . . , ' ' , . 0. , , ',.,,:;,,•,,‘..- ,._ , ,-'.1,_ ,,r,.',7:.,,,,,, :,:,' 44;4y,.., , ,iti&f,*040,47q5.11,k1Aft.t,t9kftlq3; "'''.”.i`r:T,,I,\'0",'-';V:".1,r -,,,'''%,tiri'l'i'l':ilk', '''Yl; .l .. '.,',-.,"-'•"P',I',-•'',1: ''' , .•'.. .".; ,''..'.. ...,:':'...,?..- ,....3,4,..'.:,,,'t '.! ., .,.1,`C;,,t•• t , .• ',. -; •.,'f.;1',f.''',', ,,. t 4,..f.,:N`74A,ki i&A,t1{..,;•,,,14C,=:it,i••, ..1c,.,,,',-„,..!/..;.44,,,'..,A4,4.q., 11;'',.c,, ,4,f4,.1,.1.4,1::?.) 0,...ti4;',tfl.,''•i'..! ..,!,,A..,1.,..,. .!,.,,,,J,. .,,i,,,,,'.'!.-,;',t.r..4;',\.,-,,,,':'•':••,,.?".-'4,.''',.!I At*Ir,,VI'r0,‘,",,i40`,.4.,,iiir,:',44Yhr•i;~ , , • ',-'' '•',t'r ,..:., .',...;:.'.,..;i1,'/•':',"•','': ''''. .`..,.sitji'N:4:',4:-.4;ii":',,44ii,!Iliiiici`4t(4-;; ;;-',t1,Y,:• '" '°r''''tl''',''',.14v.Vii:`,TSLI".`'I'ii,`4.1itilitte'PA44,ii;fi4A I ,. , •., .: .. .., 24,•:,:'•f':1-2.1.;,-.4r.'';', '' 4,,..'i, >'1.?,1.:''AP'jit‘,'l''....''',"'/'fql,t'l''',j.4 i;''' • ..-1(. f'. ',.' ..,..--'.:,',..•..''','• ,f ''''‘'.1'/'''''‘,4*4"rgl...../41i,f'tf)''44'Wq•.,',''' •.,.f..roiv.*:,11,,kill,,,-..0,'11.4..1,',,r.v.i:,0,!,. . ,.. ,•• • . ...,,,,, . -,- •,,.!•.,,,.,,,,,,,c,..:t,„, , v,,,,,p.:i41,1,q1,,,,•':!tr,ti,,,,, :',: ,,,;',1,,t f'', , ' .''Ii3e4i.•%.,44.4.`A't,‘F>i„444:104-4:',.4‘,.: ,,:_„1,60/(-1,';'•1 J4,:1/44,irttoLif,Y,,,41•0,'..,:;' i ". • -;-.' -: • !.(c"•""• ,`.'-' ..-..1q,y3;,•r4,..."'4!milvd/KA„:,I.:41..-..T...'. ''',I'.,'",14.4,'-rti,i'irlVi,4•,'67-illl:ti, ',', i •''. - : -i' .' .$ .:::1'1.;''''.'P'' 7, , .... .',4'it,-41..''Vr/st.052%4P'70, ''... ', , -,,' ; ' * ... "',:',':..."•-...':'-:-... ..• . .J.)11't ti,i'."2'i;1‘'.''')16•41,,!',.vt,'"' ''-P-T,':'4,2147,c,4tirt;-:.'-'iiiit-,11illt,:t ':;.3, •,-.:.' .,'••,:,„li.'.,.., L,-_,;i:,,,');::,;,:-A,,,,':;.!. :i.".4:A•.•i•,,,,,,7',: li..17.7,k.4.,Tpi,,. ' i,Itti4,••, „.•','...t:1'.074,,..,:"..14t.14. - • •...,;,,;, t.)!,...,,i,;;.r,,,Itrtt,•!,",44,4.ttM44,7 ' 'It-;''1'WP`.1,'F4''1''.";t'l!?..',".ri',•,P. •-•• . ' . •'t ''..:ii''';•;-•-•::'•'''...,.;:'r..';';:;''''.•''''t ':'',''':;','^Z!'''',f.•• . , ,.... I ''P';',Itti.;'.iibt(),,'''':4.`, •••0.1•44i:•,.: •""il; 10-.1..• 'tV41t,'1,1%i'l;',',!t'itV,4t.tt:',444.-": --,,-...?4",-,r...,„,-•..,..t.ft.:.,,,.....,... ;.- -• ,', I'rt .•••Lf•I ,, . ., •.:4;5,•,f1,,,!! . 1%,1,5%'";;;;41,14.•;4. 41*.,,tk , •, •„- .... .A,L.,,t,,,,--7,1-42.'7-...,:' 1:',7.-:; •••;". ' • ,. , . i ....'it:ii.,.:•,4,,t•k,.:''r:',..,,:,.(t,'r,-, , ......,.,„,,....... 1 .,..., ...,..- -,..,..=:;,..-i.. . :-, ' . ,.. . -. ', t ri II 4:4,44' ill k :'4':1, 4•0"' e'',t4 I 11:'°' A,114'.'11:;i'•'-Ii.''41!11,iliilit' . . '''''''• '''''''''..1";:.;•:•‘••%'"'" '" t . A -7 W.I.:. . f.1 o/t t4ti 1 '1..'I 1 ' 't r ki,, ii.41 •-,,,•••-',:-,'c' ..,,,,,A•4',•'4 1 - . t •,0,114*,:?-- .i., .1 ,,,. . ..... ./.••..',,f,-`, ''''.-. '..- 1 i, Y.''..'", •'il:,,.":':;,}-=V''''r''''''::- . ' t'i44: ,i,4 1 !,,ld. ' i•P' is 1.4 it'',11 ' 'p.i. ,,,,, • :;-. •'•:-.,-•'•'•' '",•••ti''''",'••:' t..4`''.:,, .i"1. ' J•4 .,...f.! .f" ,. •;,,;; 1 '''. • ''-',,i':';-; :,,V-;:',i,,.....,-.!1.,',,,,44,...„„ „,,,,,,,,.,„,,,, ,.f.-'f,;2...- 41,' ,... • r4.94;47044.4•pror, ' , ., .1 ,,1_.,, , ,., ,,,,,,,,,,.:„.,4,%,,,,ci.t..:0,,,,,e^t,,,,,,..,,,...,,,...,,,,,,,, ,„0, ,L44.04/,,,111,,,ok.,t,,ok•,.1:,,..q. ..,t,...P0',,,,r„,";1,,.,4-13,,,,,,,,,44,%.,,,,,, 4'"-',.,,,,,,,:.4.;::;V,01',3^-!;!te.Y**-' 1Z i •,••, •, ,,,,•-•-•• -1,- -• •,‘,1 ,•-'••-•,•--,,,,,,,,v, -, . ,lv, ,,r,,,,,.;4•.; .it•01',te•i14,4ti ,. -4,,,,,,,, •••,,,t,,,,,,,,,,14.44.-.,;•,,. -,,,, .,, IA , • '. , I ,.: ` ' :.';; , ':'' .'.,::' ''1'.:‘,.'.,=.';::".'i.'9.?..'' ''''''A4.'+J.4,...:Ktrp,..,.1........,,:fiK.4'!-Av4.0, .t...r.,,,,.,„,y.F.,.- -.• •. •''''_. . ._,,...„„i.:. ' i . 1 • .. . ,,. ,-.,L.,,,..,:,-I4K-44.1*,......q.:`,..f.,:',.,.4'' . k.'44,41... ,,...:..., ''". 4..1,/- ,;..-.:',.. -,4.,. 4,..,•,...,s,...;•i.A..11-:;..t,,,: .,:"—`,'T 1.14,1 ,,,..'•:.':',.'. :;,,,,,‘,.a q: ,,.4WrAilfrr,4;:,,s,'t,',...'i,.';:,,„„.,,,,,„".:.,"!:,,,,,,,,,*,:i•*q11Pr.;''ft,,#11:;f:f.:','";:lityt.i-i,':!Airl...,-;'gptiatitolvmtit,i,fr4f.'1,1C,IIII.1".7::=,+,; 1 '-''''',"..-:.:,,z,'.'.11•,:i..,-;'2'..'''... ,,-,,;'.,:v....:,-.'i.,:....•:,.:2',,,,;,;-;4=.!.;=1,;,4i. ,,,i.f,',:i*',,,I,I.-,0,,4t'fittO',';',,:re..Y .',!'1, ;-7$1 ; i', ;?:r.'t,;,if*/,..,-.'i 11' ., .t,,,1 !),i;14.1'tiO 1 I. 'i-,:' '- :,1.,:'i ,',''''•,':',/,'' ','-',-!..;.,",',;.:'..,',F:.-%‘:."'''';: r"-''.1'''.'''''''..;•;'"2:i!''''''''.'''''',Q.' 1....'''''''"."'Iiit'FAMILY-1.1-1 -ifi:M.IF;Tf:,P,..,-,.,,:4„* -,f)LC:i111411,R,11, A.,.S:0U,..,1,1.T).1.1,Y,M0..,,..Ne.= ..'.i..,,,i.i.:,...q.: ,...,,,r,,,!;.....,./ 1,,i1,i.,1,,..„,,, .=,i1.0.Afil i . ....'',. -,..,-...-:.-..'..:,' .'!-..i.-."..-:,.:-..:,-‘2,:•4-.1..--. , ',-'..c,r.'=v-,-,.,!,of.., 4e.'r40,„,,itst oppw_Tor,,m!FI'Prtf,,,,.:43k,•-4211iF41 • :0 i . • -. , k-.,,f,.....,,,...,.,J•,;,..!,.!.%,...1".:.,",`,0,,'•':-:..,..,:,.-A.,-''..t-,,,.,•.:!-,..1" .9,,i.l.i , i ,... ,,,..•.,-,...",t..:.,„.;_.,..„..,:„.,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,z,,,,,,,,,,,,,, . ....,..„,,,,,...,....„,.„.,,,r,„.......,,...:,,,,-,,,....„,,,,..,,,,,,,.,,,,,,;.,,,,,,• ,,..„t,,,,,,...i . • , ,`,•;.';7,-i..',,,:,.?"..., :,•.:,'.../.:,'!."',,...,!';;:.L'':t.'r.'4,-..4;:„C'',.'il'il,L:,n14,'.:,':::.' ,•, '..,::.4,,:;:',',,,,,,,.43,14'P': !t ,,. . , „. .h'.,''1 1:.: _.,,_ ..„.„.., , 1 ... ....., ..... ;...,..,,,L.,e4.,.,` :'•';'-0/1',',,q It, i.t,t.,4 11'44 .,rrit,,,,,,,,,•,,,,„,.:,...„...,.. „.„,„....;,,,,,..„„„, , ., . . ...,, .„ ..,..,. :.„„,„ .: . . .,.... „.,...„...,,,:. .„ ......,„ ,,., „ ,,., „,. ,,,,,... , 'Zif,1 0.,,,...,',4'/,-.,-1.7tr;'-',".:0'.4.1,•''''5'..4,•.;".".tt'e.'ib?. ./e''.V.4'ti/A0'.41,7tattl i ''" -'''' ••'-• ,1 7,-:.1' " -i ',‘1;'..''..,,i,lbi,.1'...;i9,'is`;':t. ,.14Ce.•114,-,1..^.m..,.70.,.,...„If,,,„+,,,,i,,,, ,.,,! .,t,,,t-404,44,4 .1 . 4..' ,.."-•.'";•''i',. 7,',';-r;.:,T,.,':,'L,.1q:•';11';e•.A04,e,'k.ir..1,...,.',, ..t.,,.il,;,:,... .,.. ,)',4,....0 4;,44,','. ., t...v,44-,.;:,•,;.,,-.,;-4,:t. , t Oak .49,,, .trt,7r 1 ,-. i ' ' '',41'':.d.':',-,':: .'r.'ftt'it.,4, ;,-.AtAr':e--.,..i.04/40f4'!"40't•“'''''''Vfl',- ..'''''g','.; %$:', 'i. 1,,t;',-.Yj:0-c":1:,.'1.1.',,,i'viit'..',.. :•,','.',•,-:,' :2••,'.,-,,„I,4..7.:',.:,,-.• .:.,'. .-.1;?,%,, '''',.;':'!,':!•..' •;i•P,'I`iik110',01'4.,A,<PNt..,4:-,•,..,,,.,!i4.,; !.!•,.!;'.1 a,.,, . i . - ,•,- -., - ' - ..',,.••,• .''•-r,..1,'.:.''--:,:'•';:,,,,.:7 ,-,-,...,..x,%, "::.•".2,'.4...,..:',:v.,-.., ,r r,...,,!, ,t...e. ,r ••,;.;',,,..',. ,,, i .i, ,iik,Vt1 , \ 1i.' ,.......„...•„ . ,..„,.„...,,„,„.,,Pip, ,(i , ,r , l'it.',..51,',,,, „ ,!:;',:,ci•''..,'",.;:,.,,,,,i3:3,,. .45.'4,';',';.•1'44:1..;,.';.1,.,-l'iti$'.I4A,; ;',;;;;;',11,Ve 4.,ir.;'%,;‘,go'',W f14,4,7;"'',;,:'I .,.......,,,..'.,,. ...,;.;.,,......I .I, , .......„, f ',.._',,,.,4,,•-•,t.,„'.:,,,;!.,,,...?,z1r,,'.,.:i:.‘1,...i.--,•:,..,,,::.,,,-,..,, . 1,--,',1)ri y..,,,,.;,.Y. ...,,,..,f. . 0,k',,,,...:',„-,.7.•.;',,,,,,, 7 ';',;',1:";',' ,-','..'Yir...‘,,.,,,.:4:4 f_.,., :.,.•; '.Y 0..)'''..;:',..ii, ,,,;',4.1(7!";r.;,'.,,3, frir,Pitvii.kti 0 4.,,t,,,f.t t-4, •Pt-ts,;.,,,.:7„..1,,,, ,,, !,,-;.31,:,;I:Z;;;Vi,k441,;, Wtivitt.I.Ari 41.vi 0 , ,,, ,•,..,.,:t- • •11„;•---;-,,t;,,'‘,''''1,I C've.:..., ,t1i,I.:.t:-..t7.IA;.,.,,,A,,, f?,.v..,, , . ..,,..'......, ....k::::, -;,,,.;44..,,,14.k'..,`:Lliiir-•-••.,,,ti,-,)--,A,-)P-?.7.:-,41.,r.",'.!1.,j•-•,'-‘,,,..1 , , -.,'•'.,'",'„,,,'..';...',C.,',,,,'„',1!,.'• i.,'', .',:"'I'r,i.q. ''-'1;0',A,', V,".?,:..q,`,;3,';,',,!.-,',,ri,i.:?:01' ,,..A;.'e 0.4-.. ..,-,,,,,',i r•,..:', ‘% ',,c-'7 6 l',,,,„::..,-,AP;••.,...:3.4 4.„-tst%•. ......„., , ,..,..,,,,,, 1,- ., :, f.,,,kon .„.‘,4,s.:y,,t; • i ,• ,' . .X .'4:0;itr?.ffe,t -ws,",,ic;;A. *IA, .°L.,, .,,. - .' ;t • ' - "-• 0,'..7,473;',1.44,64,41;,"1,,t146:1 , .''. •''.'. ' 1 .:,‘..:,,;:-.::- . -- — '......,r,:r '... ,1 . ' .1t/00'..,.". ..Y11,1,:,k..., .,.., .... ..„_ ,,,.„...: 4 , -,..„, ...;,1 ,, ,,,,,,,„,,,,,,t,,....\,,,,,,li ,, ,,',:‘.?:.;11-ZI°J,,i‘'',:.,:',1:1:,,a-f"'•-i i:.- ".'i-:: --".•i i'r.' ,,,-;,.1 ,,'!,.•. 'fri..,f ,-,:,;',`:.'g,..4,r.AF!,,ftr„r1C7, ,1;:, ,Z;:.;,ir,,,,V•,,,,,,. ,!,',,,q,-::!„ i-.0,,A:,,,,,,,,\', ''Y'r''''''''-',:t. iri'''.;IfY`r, i:V;i:4:41;trifOr%),n4‘ ''',i •:":',,,.,?4;i,2.:.„"i'', ::,.:"„',;'$'0,,..,ir.,..,.4;,,,,...,4,t.,,,,,,,4 • . - • '.;; ...•'•,,,'"'''`.-','''.' i+.4,--P'-''',7,7''','--'71,''x4i.i.',V,0 tskti,,,,,,;,,Jr•T';'..1"'11"•F';','"P-Vi'V.,,0*. ,...4 t.,'.• :P.:,,,.., "ti t",."1',•,ri4.1.4,•,2t4;'. 4 ::, ,• ..,,..,. .,.,..,,,ti;,,,,,,;f„....,,i ;,..;..„;,.,. ;.;:..„4,0;7 9,, .I'l.kt..4,1'-.L.I'.',4•'./.':'''t l'r." ).::'." '*.' '.'Is.''' th''''"onl, ' s.: ,' •-•-• •-•-li '••', ,• '•,-.*--_,..-,•::••• -•,,,--•.'••••'• ,,:••,,.„-'0,•-hi^,,,,s•--Af•-..a.•,,b1,:i,,,,,• ?::,-The,„••rwer,...:1y4 ',','.:.•-, ::'•:, .,-','..i.:.,;,•,,,l.,'...'„What;:inQq§.1iliC''•Brann',,,IPP"7'''''' --'`-':',g••;-=.•S'.,7;''.1i'''. ' rtati aZ.;,•..!At..,•31„.•!'q.,s,-"',-..t,;(,.,:'',",;,.:`•,•„,-.•,'':k'•••--J,:••-••'•••i-io . . . . , . . • .!'' •,-,i SSeerjeer iis-Slif:vif. atch,s's.the...Qreeri,AiVor. t• „„ir„...nspci.,,,..„1, '. ' " •',"A:`,Valley,jc.onvect frOni'farming ?,'••0•• • • 'ii dil.Sti'YIT''''.';'''''''"" ''''"The''old'Intertirbani'Railrrfl,linecl.• 10,... -,,,ii.,..-;,,,s,,,,,,.. .. _ • . , . ,., , , .,•,„t , ....•, ,, ,,,,,71.1 '..•1. . ., .,„. .,..„1sv •-always'e VOrfiiron(L•OVnting•;•ine••,,.-.-,`,•itop,right lbehind•••90,,Plac.ise,•:.'1W:S; 947 iii...,,...;' :. ::''g r.a n d d ar' P)ig h t e i'::'of r.',a:'pi,o,.4 e.:e':r-0,'''.V.p a" Y.s,.Mri.r:P':-':'''..s i y.s'..:'"They called if,Nelsen Station,Stationvi`ia,.4r.;,. .4.4 - - ' - ' •.3'.','•'•Ge ci.- If Clark of Kent Now I"••:e .14-.?:','•:', itio.Siarth ,r P.,.:.. '. ,••::-.. 1.,i'hni-,';'0',4,,IPIIA4;:,,..ek."i•ic.,4airnrt' il-c,LeAror.,.,.. -,,''''':iihf,c)ed:.,is:e:,'c',:.70,u.ill,Sch).:,:-.!,,t:1",.-"gtl.',11,0,:,--..iiha,,,hile.,:r,a1..:Q4o.':po.ff:',,i:,,,,,.,11 • : • l.'s have no iclent,ty, ,,,,i;-,;,.•.:i..:„.,,,,,,,,,, ..,,..,„i i,•, ,_-• •,.i.'.,COUrS,e. .p,;... ... ,., .y„:7,„,..,...;,•..), .....•''.Mrs.Clark;61i1Was--41'0!),.-!,. - •:.-;..:.:.,there",. ..•,,,, ,,-,..,,.,••,,,•,,.,..‘, ,;,,.3:ply:q.i, grandfather-homeateaded';aorth;af.'z'Oriili ,,1,.,--"••,`:,; ,.:,ii.s.,..6 4,-......:-, Last week'tho.barn.'On..the'pro,portY-,.`ille,',,,•',„f-'• the farm•-'after;he-r;grandiathe,r.!C4e,a0liv,i,,,,,,,,c,,,,., iark'sayii hirlathe'r and wielg.r.fi„!1,_':•,,',..',,,, ',`,:n,last-•barn-'along thelVeStyalley4lig, , ,,. i,• • Renton was lorn;:slowil.:;-'s W.0..;:•,.!)e.lpg.'.re,'",?,,'',,:':.-,"'•...,',"'Tit_ It• • • fnikiriarne4 Pile' ,She rsayC,411.0.'iii) _ . • ,•: • ...,. ,..,'•;..„"„....--,-,••;,- •",:.`•':,•-;-",'•,to some,-,. .:'--,,,- -•.• ••'• ••-••'' '-.,',•rid-pt-;k' -:•-•‘. en'tifeystiold it during the Depression ."placid by a diner. ,.,•. ..., .•(... dd. ,1 taxes.:,-! ,, •t.to be••39-)nuchlhey,eouf q• . eep MrS,..Clark.•reinorn ..,..,.,,. .„.„f.bu1',„, .... .. „.g , •.i, \ , , ,. ,,,,y,,,,,,,,,,..,..,,,,q,4.,..0.,,,,,,t,..•...--1,1 . s.••!:'' .:" , ' '-if 'froth her childhOod,''•:':°'- '•(''."`-1''1,'•'''''''''..''''..!'"'"N''-.'i-4'..-4:';',•:•.%:,,••••••••',.'„1,,t. npf..,,-,•:::',41,,,,,I,,,:q,,,,,,,,,-,r.4.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.:,,,1iti,,,..i,„.i, ii3i.:, ,,,,, ,V had lots of,fuirtherellle.9Tiva 0•••,i,'•';‘•il.• _t•,.Btirlingt01.1.tiorthera-,,bisig i:, 1pr9P,•• •-.'•• '''' ',.•,"' ..,-':' *'•:';.,1.ititi.,'.'-.eslie.says.'!".There'S.J.iilislo—ralf?Sjliror',..., ,,,:•, 4-i,ff,ir9.-10,41ig';'.Pirligariii1967,.,„...;',Nn,W,..h?,iii. ,",-'neY1,0146.7valt!,24,„ .:, .• • ••`..-', maro.s.iitiriOd'iharp;,[1 bariett,•it*hor9;W!!!',.•••,•-•47,-;;;•,goge,,',,,.,:rT-,ja‘t!..c.01.q.'.1:4•many changes'' • klidlieli,t,'"P':'''''';!I'leY•';iias'4Oeiv,-;,la;,4,1i3O,:- f4:19:! --,af11 4, kiit'anci'lidon't.lhiplc,;apyon , . , ,, ,„ ., #rro ,...,i,.,. ,„.. :-.. '', '''•- ;II.7...,::...M.r.§,...p..leric!§..•gr,#.r.qt,,,.P,..F!,'.M.,g.j,02,,p.4,4 .,,-,..1,,,,,,Mrer.tu ,,w.v.q.L.,,,,,,...,-...,1„.1.1t,..,... , .„.. ,-2,...0.:; ill ,4,,.. yo,..4., fr-•-firsCiaiile0),ili.40.iYit%i'-•iT,T,,,;!,41m',17,17,47 -4f: ',',E've , $10?.#,,1:4,1enenge.e,,..-n „A.f„.•;:lie.„.,, . ‘:,,, , •,, , ,•;',,,,.•„ii-;..„1,--,;,----;-:,'cT-.:.:-,;',:i,..1-,''''' ..:P4'.".h,,,;411,.t4i4i.',,,,,C;:::',,,?."3.:,,,..,,,,,%';,.,'''.'..,',-lip-'iiithi'l orthiiiitgaitlIV4i/Med-1•1914 - • ' " - IN',. '.: ;'','''..,"..'"' -'•'- .''"-...'.'''•'''''.i'''':',1,0-'"''j,,14,',idi':ro-Y,F4e;11«,!'',7.-77`.,•' '..." :::,.).2,,,.,.:•,,,--k.,,.....;',i,,,•74,), 5"..,:':,:i:•;...A % . ' '' 0i,;.r...".•'..iiie ,WaS','S'Dane,';''.I...'Mtl;:!•C10...r,k'"r•OPe.ili,......'-,i';',,,V,i,'get,,atir,:•ip,a, 4,10411, ,;Jo,,.1(.,,,,:•,,,! ..,,-,,:y.'.f.,,,,,,;'..,',1*,(-;:,,:...t,'„i.r.--,xiat,,,,,,I . .,. ••• -.,-.''- .:k.• ' hand .''' ' f tore briny•grandinother s•!••;,-,,, ..„•;,• ',' -,•••-.• ,.„,orthein says it'plann40,11.50A , - ,-, ••hers,.1 .ni'.9,4,.P.,c. ..... •• ,.,.•• ••-•- ,•••••,i'-'i,.;,..."‘A . .. hai''In > '',•' ,' -... •1 i' and hini,:and sit.SaYs'Wash!ng011 Terri gr..,:),,,. , i0mi,,of:tto!,••cociat pipics",....4.90:44,,,.. y,..,,,.;,,„ ' On it '''1:think'ihereameherObOgt IP,5.: .4;•,„•,;,-.';‘, .,--dior:-.•'n„' •,tio•iiitiii,-':-.,:•,..:,-:-.,.•„,. , r.:,,.,•2,,i,,,..4.3,ii41 . ... . .:-. .11.• ___..,.,..7-.- .., .,, -•-•.-•••••;. •.•'•,,,••••,,,,,,-. •.,.•-,,,•:„-•.,•.; its new.' y7,-,......7,,„.„7-,,,,,,,....; :l..,...,,,,I...,.,..,...;..,.",y0'..,gv,.;,1 • ',,. .. ',•':'.'ii .:‘, Mrs' Clark remern—hAralher,Aran- iga_hsa-e•r--;',1,-"?'"'''‘.;','44;ilt.;' ';rhase''''' ''' arJ2:''Cla''sin.4.;.',6014,1'-.BOW. qe;!!!:,,i ',,' A . -..-. - ,, .., •I• 'ding liap's"4".1,0-1t ick''-'4' - -•,,,,,14,,-- •-•1•,-, '''00.'yifileckto.:b,,,wft,'t • • •• .,'-,.•"•'.:;.'•raied several-crops,inc.ii.,,. ,., ,..,,.. -, •-,,,,•,,,,44.-v-:.,htiro,4,Clarkill11991744wAilqii:...„.v.s4 f.,•,..o *•,i.,,,,•,,-..„•„2•••-4 '' ''''''; '''. •it-i•;'•-•HAIiii te:Avavone:;ortheqiir§t::to,,,limpois,,,,,;;,4„..,-,„ ', . •.,.•••, ';'•1•-",..''''''?"'" „. ", , .... .•.r',._•• ,,,.. lt•....filri -4,,,,,A4?.I.L. ,,,:t•,,,ar,f4eV1411144.11414,!4‘,Fr.;'"0;14-,r;;Ptiltt'.rt,:•t•;1',..4,.41."-trttkl';‘,7.`4"74, • - - -. •'''. "'''t.f.;•••.--jpinest toi'work In i!kwr .,-•',..1.,,I,,-•'.1,-‘,.". "...,,,..,,••,i ,.‘,..,.,,I. :.•i•--',.4iii...4,„--iiisa,Highway=1. -,:,,,, .,•-,'1'04,i'Vi••.;'-', ,-'1.1:•4,1.,!•,;;: i4.;lilki.4/:,..k..4-,'‘.,,,t:;:"••;,,-,,.q.,,:,Today,,114:1W:',4aAe'.f4 4.-.:,,rr---L. f. • 't:•:.,••':,';.'. ados;•.T.T,',"::',,,P,,:,.-/t,;,..ri..-4..1:..i,1•,...S.,t,l'...1:1.:!,,',,,D'S',,.'..1j..:',::..1/Y2i1;?,""`.;..^ •i 'am' 1'a.. /a.- '-:-.I.W.A... .•ak41••••es.. ft- ... .. , F R ti t4% PLANNING DEPARTMENT • RENTON,WASHINGTON - a � ' MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 • (00$)0 9 ° 235-2550 'y�pOgT CA PITM July 25 , 1974 Glacier Park Company Burlington Northern Railroad Richard L . Vincent Real Estate Development Department 600 Central B.ui l di ng Seattle , Washington 98.104 RE : Renton Planning Commission action on application for Special Permit and Site Approval , application #SP-784- 74 and SA-785-74 , on a site near Strander BLVD. along West Valley Highway . Dear Mr. Vincent: The Renton Planning Commission reviewed the abovementioned applications at their July 24 , 1974 Public Hearing and approved them subject to the following conditions : Special Permit ( fill ) • I. Staff approval of provisions for erosion con- , trol and sedimentation control during construc- tion . Site Approval 1 . Staff approval of final landscape plans with the retention of as many existing trees as possible. 2 . City approval of final drainage plan with pro- visions for storm water retention and oil/water separation capabilities as is necessary and acceptable by King County Hydraulics , City of Renton Engineering Department, and City of Renton Planning Department . 3 . Approval of State Floodplain Permit through King County Hydraulics Department. 4 . Approval by State Highway Department and City of . Renton Engineering Department of access plan . 5 . Posting of a performance bond for installation of landscaping and a 3 year maintenance period . Richard L . Vincent July 25 , 1974 Page Two Concern was also expressed about the width of the driveways . It was felt that widening them to 30 feet would help to relieve the problems of ingress and egress onto West Valley Highway , given its higher speed limit . This could hopefully be accomplished without endangering any existing trees slated to be incorporated in the site development. , Also there was concern that there was not enough landscaping breaking up the large expanses of paving anticipated to accommodate a greater number of parking spaces than are actually required . This impact could possibly be relieved by converting some parking spaces to landscape islands , dispersing them intermittent- ly throughout the parking areas . If you have any further questions , pleas'e contact this Department. Ver truly yours , ichae L . Smith Assistant Planner MLS/kh cc : Roger Williams , Project Architect Richard Bouillon and Assoc ./Architects Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 10 , 1974 Page Six 5• ADMINISTRATIVE: A. FIELD TRIP Field trips to view the sites of items of new business were scheduled. Members were given their choice of : 1 . Saturday , July 13 , 8 : 30 a .m. , Sheraton Inn Coffee Inn . 2. Monday , July 15 , 7 : 00 p . m. , Municipal Building parking lot . B. OLYMPIC PIPE LINE PROPOSAL Reminding the Commission of their recommendation to Warren C . Gonnason , Public Works Director, that an environmental impact statement be required for Olympic Pipe Line ' s proposal , the Chairman noted that Mr. Gon- nason was present to make his response . Mr. Gonnason advised that the permit that the City would be issuing in connection with. the franchise itself for the pipeline merely covers public rights-of-way within the City . The permit gives the Company the right , subject to City regulation , to install their petroleum pipeline facilities within the public rights-of-way of the City . Responding to the concern of the Planning Commission re- garding the potential impact of a terminus being located within the City of Renton , Mr. Gonnason indicated that while he recognized that there could be substantial impact effects from such development , Olympic Pipe Line does not actually have a terminus in the City of Renton . . Transfer of products through pipelines continues to other areas . In addition , he stated that the matter of poten- tial impact does not pertain directly to this application • and that any spinoff impacts , such as petroleum trucking , terminal stations , tanks , etc . , should be treated on their own merits and governed by whatever land use considerations' are involved . He indicated that the City Council , through its Community Services Committee , had worked with Olympic and had mitigated a lot of what they considered impacts within the City itself. Discussion followed with Commissioner Humble stating that Olympic had informed Commissioner Scholes , Planning Com- ' mission Community Services Committee Chairman , that the pipeline would not continue on to Portland. Mr. Gonnason replied that the Company proposes an operation for two lines to Renton and that the existing line goes to Portland now. Mr. Farr of Olympic advised him that regarding terminals for product delivery to organizations such as Shell they can hook into these pipelines at any point and establish facili - ties at any place along the pipeline . Further discussion ensued regarding the location of the Olympic facility in Renton and safety provisions for the pipeline. The Planning Director noted that all areas of potential points of danger have specified valve locations . Responding to Commissioner Wik ' s comment that the Planning Commission Community Services Committee had looked upon the matter from the impact that might evolve from the whole network , Mr . Gonnason said that from some points of view the impact of using a pipeline is less than other G-74 a 'e r Renton Planning Commission Meeting July 10, 1974 Page Five Noting the location in May Creek Valley adjacent to a B- 1 zone , Mr. Ericksen advised that the request is not in agreement with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan . The applicant presently has a painting operation at his residence which he wishes to convert to a painting contractor' s office , shop and storage . Area involved is approximately 1 . 2 acres . Discussion ensued regarding application of the proposal to B- 1 zoning and future requirement for shoreline manage- ment action . Commissioner Ross asked that results of the pending study of commercial zoning in the May Creek area by the Comprehensive Plan Committee be made available for Commission information . SPECIAL PERMIT - SITE APPROVAL: C. PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT CO. ; Appl . No . SP-780-74 special permit to allow filling and grading in G zone ; Appl . No . SA-781-74 ; site approval for overhead to underground electric transmission terminal station ; property located 150 ' north of Strander Blvd. bridge and 450 ' east of West Valley Highway and southwest of Longacres Race Track . The applicant is undergrounding overhead service lines to the West Valley Highway and requests approval of construc- tion of a power substation similar to others previously approved . Special permit to fill in the substation yard and access road , approximately 2315 cubic yards , will be required . The site is in the vicinity of the Glacier Park site recently rezoned to M/P . Landscaping is included in the site plan . It was noted that this is an allowable use in a G zone subject to Planning Commission approval . SPECIAL PERMIT - SITE APPROVAL: D. GLACIER PARK C0. ' Appl . No . SP-784-74 ; special per- mit to allow filling and grading in M-P zone ; Appl . No . SA-785-74 ; site approval for restaurant facility ; property located on east side of West Valley Highway at intersection with Strander Blvd . Noting that the property had recently been rezoned to M-P , the Planning Director stated that it will be neces- sary to fill the northwest corner of the site with approximately 3,000 cubic yards of material for ingress and egress . The site will be developed in accordance with M-P standards , and landscaping plans for natural preservation of area meet Soil Conservation Service specifications . SPECIAL PERMIT: E. SHELL OIL CO.; Appl . No . SP-734-73 ; special permit to construct a petroleum marketing plant in H- 1 zone ; Highway , midway between Olympic Pipeline - Mobil Oil site and Longacres Race Track . The Chairman advised the Planning Commission that it is the Comprehensive Plan Committee ' s intent to have their recommendation to the individual members prior to, the July 24 public hearing -for their consideration . He urged the members to read the ' Shell final environmental impact statement and staff summary in preparation for the public hearing on July 24 .