The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA86-057 } • 1 • a + • Architecture and Planning.•; . F . , o Leason Porrieroy.Northwest,Inc..Royce A.Berg A.I.A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 August 1, 1986 COURIER a pAL21jFillar, TT!'") er off - a 7- S6, TEM o Mr. Roger Blaylock Planning Department • City of Renton Renton, Washington 98055 Re: BlackRiver Corporate Park (Valley 405 Business Park) File No: SA 057-86 V 058-86 Dear Roger: The following is the parking tabulation used for developing this phase of ADMAC. Function S.F. Ratio Stalls Office 28,782 S.F. • •1 200 144 Manufacturing 39,057 S.F. . 1/1000 39 Warehouse/Storage 24,846 S.F. 1/1500 17 Deck/Entry Plaza 485 S.F. 0 0 Total 93,170 S.F. 200 Stalls Please note we are holding a number of these parking stalls in landscape areas preserved for future parking if ever required. ADMAC has projected a maximum number of parking stalls required at 158 stalls which is what is provided on this initial phase, with 44 additional stalls reserved in landscaping. Future expansion to the north will add additional facilities and parking to suit any changing needs. Res ectfully, Roy eq. Berg Pre ident RAB:cpm cc: Bill Griffiths, V.P. , ADMAC Barbara Moss, FCE Greg Byler, FCE Elliott Severson, FCE • • rafigiwifirtip-- •-. •� • 2. y Fri _ 1 ; • 1: ..til. 1611 4., ..;...: twAziit. p.--\- -1.1-ir - ... ,, .... ;:4'AiD , 4‘41A" ' • l am, , .y t . • . ::: . - -- ''." -�� ''4:.'kil ''''.*-•.J6:1 3%,,,';- .. t: T � .,� �1 s. ' A . SITE fH` VJ't . �i ", rG:t �., y,.�-••:,' {,if' `; i�� ; .-,1! ; `: _ t -•`'' ••J t; .4-.-- .r n 'T t y� r-.,,-"•5� .fi ,- ..:i ®':. `t' .ksk ,, , .4i y %P i>�°i�=+ _.,:�=yam • .. V-4 t t •i i• s} .fi \tt �!•f,• ; `A- r--•• . _ - - -7A, ', t fl- .,'. -'�'{- ' :_ { }fi ( ,,,.:_ �,' ,��..';- y ,yS- �.�.. rr' l� • --- _ -•.�•# - '�,:a.��F'�-.•C s'' `•l r �. R�,t_ r:�,. ��„y � V=_; :< �t-`�-�..y T ,'x.-_�' ��• s ;-, - •t 'Y .w.r er �` ' .. t_ _ �•^,.4. ..........:_ _1}..70.., 1. 0. S. • fy ;@„ ,F:,,,,,:l...:..,.i:_i_v_.:114,:•:1,-,..,'.,._;-.:-:. ,.= x-� "mod' sf•F`'."�•E..i • '�f ,�� ♦ `� •�Y - _r -.. 11 2 \ - __�A F -_- ..s 'g • 4-04 - i i• ' - r• to". `�i .• �++� ,.:' •'r rs+ r" t t tir'+.•:.=ryas >4+,ssz�= + �-}. '�),• .•.• • t? 1 j + r*••• ' ris- . .,)..-47,•-•.:1-\-: ..-1.. . ,,, It i ., ._ , :i..,i....,.;,/,..r4.?4.'.: v-./.., ' ,.' . .1.:, imi 12h j/[ i ac 7 t 11 '= mil'.. '...... ; ---,.....,.2 , . . . / I/ -NF j ti ;'_ -- P Powell Ave. • Conceptual Master Plan _ , -_ tj yt S t i. v t 1. �. 1. ^r 3 c ._ •L .. • k `S t t. F. ,....... Corporate Park • :..•-_::. • _ '` f i • • VALLEY 405 ' \ lI : ' .. _ _ . _,I RENTON, WASHiNGTON .-i_ k . I r. • • ,,. f, ,. •- • M �1 \`� :� �J I • 4 :ems Y FIRST CRY EOUITIE i _-- •y. 7 l °' - ' ' 'L�iy1 /t •'•4.r 1 LEASON POMEROY JORTHWEST '• Grady W a y 7.747 MITCHELL^ NELSON SOUP I� ' _( • �. CITY OF RENTON - • • 1 'lli: - JUN 27 1986 ,M. - �'4- c ' -8< •• - - �� BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. SAo -8;6 ' 5Itit� 1� CITY OF RENTON Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg - David M. Dean -Mark E. Barber - Zanetta L. Fontes -Theodore R. Parry ��`Q }�- a �. Assistant City Attorneys 1�! 1nE1 II March 23 , 1987 TO: Ron Nelson, Building and Zoning Director FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: First City Equities Dear Ron: I received a copy of the proposed Agreement between the City and First City Equities to implement conditions No. 1 and 2 of Site Plan Approval No. SA-057-86 . I have the following comments: 1. There is no necessity for the City to enter into any agreement. The developer is to prepare the necessary restrictive convenants. I do not like paragraph 5 which says that the agreement shall be binding on all parties . That is the reason why I do not want the City to be a party to any agreement. 2 . , The Hearing Examiner' s Decision requires a reservation of 80 feet. The agreement reserves 60 feet. I have also reviewed the agreement to develop a benefit assessment district. I am bothered that the agreement gives control of the study to the developer' s consultant and I wonder how the City can exert any control over that type of study. What happens if the City does not like the study results? The City needs to make sure that there is some method for it to have equal control over the study and some way to disavow the results if they are clearly not in the City' s best interest. The way the agreement is drafted, we are agreeing to accept the study results before we have obtained them. It is hard to understand how that will mitigate environmental. impacts if we do not know how they are to be mitigated. • LawrenceCT.. Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 0(-Ak\C"ftl \ -16— �, [1: )) S:\ f* Imbi,1161 7% lb, ft"> %*) *% owftsi SA - os-7 -6(0 C�NfIDEN1I�L CONFIDEN11.4i. 1.:°;L ‘10° MCDNM CO\FIDE\ TVL CONFIDENTIAL ,---...,,,Act-4,4,..____.L oi2--ri-i0la•H .46,1L-gabz2. • ,: s 4 • j•//NES p�E �� la. • //J1 -."0 ri1. / 4y ,;_: / , YAKIANCE • :', •// S• ITE r / LOCATION qi; KWG COUNT'( ' ,{ // C PUMP STATI O}J — �': TO BE OlJST. ' SUMMER '$(.. 4 • ^_ • I I w • ' kJ 'fin` 3 5 . Z { a vp • �-t LIDS 2 • • • )111:: - wS >Nj �Q NMETRO `TTJ14. wO0aF DISPOSAL • Q O N J do J _., P4 6 • RAp� yJ ' -f< ;Y I - 406 .f i o S.tom. 1foTs+ 4 - . t,. 7 `1 ,} • • 'itil V E CI N I TY MAP 6 S :1 0 0- A E • `]'yr - ::I�� :ugh` r 1 L �L _ .4 Wy - �: Y.. " 1 - x�� N t :@r 1n r '1 ..1'•''1' Y4.n `s r" ti :.g:� =1 .A;` `ice -F' ...:.,..r 1. .t:�.. -` :ram- .a. .. _: .:..:'�. ... .....:... J,, J .� r ,-_.,sayd�. .... .".i-�,a -y..v ., ts•.. _. ., ,....... <..,:.^�4._'i.. '"-f., ....4-:.::; +.f:"-� !'S..vta"4 .e-x,,.� ra.,.,y." FSi`.: .•,... - y:�,:,,e K.,ti.'k--+'"`;r�.a�7. i.7r. ".P r. a. -'vj. - tx ki• li '".,, a'"la- ..-r}��E. ",5': .a:.' :=k. .,,r. ..�C ".x...!' �= :: -. .� �•,�h '�:� _..:a'•v" ,;,�•. •: .;,.,fir.-,..��:'(, .r.•,. ?1^� '.i�§. ,Cr&?:�5_. .�� f., `y. .:i `�.t.:tr a:� y '�.j.�.w' ?.. r},T"�Rk:"..:: �y=+:� -i,<;'-A'a.>.:.:i{�•' a�.� ' hy:�.A. fit. `Sh .,• ,- ''��` a'�•.yy . ;• rr,n.S'a,r�.''`J,"r.. ,.�s �?'�-6= �.'se�s iv� :.4 '�:"aw°:,-o^... ;.�Csy :,i-1::�:`.:1;:-r'•77Y-�;:,;'F-+; 'z-z.'.' ..;3'..i s r""'� f>L x t. ','„uvr._ .,'r_•A ..K'+', .:?J,;..i,:.r.- n.s A-�'��- ,.�., s.; f•;;• fd•- a -.d. 't,•,: +1f r.•v. ':i ..yy++ee''yyy )Y? 4. tC.-1, r,� "1 .d, '�: y ti ;131 ''''' y{:'''' .: M �' ,....1., ,i':'. .r1 . �i , ...:�Y�"�+��'k�i:•. 1,4r�,i?."�'�r•:�v�i!.(. � .. �. .i,r1 r. ,,. ,s 'd"r }'. a p... :t,.,,.,yµ,;-..,,wt,. 3�. :i ��.r-��e- �_ ''tt.. - ��`�f�T�' : ��J'.r a�Zti�.1'r;1�Y��a:ti. 'k :�a v X:V:.�at5tisi41.xr ..s;,* kat a L.',•(.,ry-a.,:se. h" %�` E="S ..3` r '�iti,.r. �". L IIL b5G(a-1101.1 �I� . • • • THAT PORTION OF TRACT 25, RENTON SHORELANDS 2ND SUPPLEMENTAL; AND THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE I, • SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, I WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS ' FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE \ . . - NORTH 00°58'28" EAST ALONG THE NORTH - SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 884.84 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 26 OF RENTON SHORELANDS SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MAPS, 1958, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52. WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 382.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70°54'02' WEST ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID • 4- + TRACT 26, A DISTANCE OF 73.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE n N CHARLES BROWNELL DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 41; THENCE NORTH 01.24'04" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 950.58 FEET TO u w A LINE 35 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF ^la ' ' THE EXISTING MOST SOUTHERLY TRACK OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. 7.1.1Z • PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE 35 FEET I 31w SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF THE MOST N • - • SOUTHERLY TRACK, ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE CENTER OF WHICH 1, BEARS SOUTH 15°22'32" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,790.19 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 659.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°32'14" i R=110 2,4 b TO A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, , A=13•32'14" ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH- Ri2-7901 g59 24 • , =BQ�'1 d.g � 01°50'18" EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,102.46 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 807.11 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41"56146"; THENCE SOUTH S6,. 49°53'32" EAST, ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 167.07 576`•• FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, ALONG SAID PARALLEL %, 167,07 - - LINE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,829.78 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 309.67 N49.53'32•W FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09.°41'48"; THENCE LEAVING SAID NOTE: \ PARALLEL LINE, SOUTH 40'11'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 126.24 FEET TO TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC '% 0 \ A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD TO EXPIRE UPON THE EXTENSION OF NACHES ,Y % • ,. :7, R=1829.78 RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, ALONG SAID SOUTH I -r AVENUE SOUTHWEST-iCj R 600.00 „ =09 41'48 LINE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 49°48'16" EAST HAVING A J �41 35.76 53 L=309.67 -- ADMAC Development RADIUS OF 1,005.37 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 549.02 FEET THROUGH A 3 \ 13N CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31°17'19" TO A POINT TANGENT ON SAID SOUTH LINE Q lad 126.24 OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT OF . WAY; THENCE N 171.17 `,C'1 S40'11.44 E CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST ALONG A N 83 25._ lw��l to LINE 50 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EXISTING SOUTHBOUND 1��, R=1005.37 TRACT, A DISTANCE OF 826.56 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TRACT 25 OF Q N' A=31"17'19- 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 71°29'03" EAST, �� / _ RENTON SHORELANDS 'Z'�' ADISTANCE OF 85 52 z ND SUPPLEMENTAL d, L=549.02 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET 01 553.44 S88.1500E `\, �� /��O `tip !V / RcB53.34, OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION / ri/ p.14o472' ` R.Bg334''," ;`' Ri0o5. i 18; THENCE NORTH 89°10'25" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID / ,4' . 11j c; V 0) ,rlir+) / L_209.55 L:1 5.9 56 . p_0.29•O7 l� - SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF -THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, A I 1 =165.97 r ;: ; .. L_e-52 DISTANCE OF 81.57 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OP THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER to ^ °' / I # r ,`, .-. �� 208 10 OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG THE NORTH ^/ '� '` ,.".: T QUARTER OF SAID �/ 893 76.33 3 0.. 55a°75'ao1 LINE OF THE SOUTH 650 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 01 I o. :: - n a 7aaz S )�� `0 SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 2 ASS- S I 18i - - _ S 1.45'00 w 2g' GJ 2 Z' : t ' ' ' :'<: �/ :r ,261.41 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE ' s '' i �/ - so.00 03'� tn01 SOUTH BOUNDARY OF TRACT 25 OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, 1958; THENCE 31 I� \ 50'LANDSCAPE BUFFER k�v .. _ Si ` 154.51 • - - 605.98 N88'15:00`VV. .. (..`i 13417 I � �• ..1 _.C17 Y ° • �- - -� ---� IzFQ �� J J J • t NORTH 33 07'25"- WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY,' A DISTANCE OF • - - 1431 - . 604.91 - so'' �_LAN0SCA-PE• 74015- ` BUFFER �r 856.35 - �Z 154.51 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 27°21'32"-EAST ALONG c�m N 33'07 25 W �T 1 - -N 88 1500 W adao '---�261:41--------�aao,� SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 387.32 FEET TO AN Af GLE POINT; L 73.51 w I 30' DRAINI�E PJ+�F-I8N7 I I ovi' THENCE NORTH 83.17'25" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE N 70 54 021W a' a o� OF 171.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46'22'22" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH K.C.A.S. 1 I J N 88°15 00�W w , BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 324.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°37'52• WEST 5 87.2 A -- - -- - - - -- 3 _ -_ __-_ 1e ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 76.33 FEET TO THE TRUE a 0 - 24 19 POINT OF BEGINNING. z ° . Architecture and Planning JOB N�:~ i 7��r'� N ��`I�1�L -_-.-- . - - Black River Corporate Park DATE _ -�- -86 _ - ADMAC Building _ DRAWN: �-�1�� oN o Glfr. 1 Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc..Royce A.Berg A.'A.,114-Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle_.WA 98121(206)624-5771 Renton Washin on CHECK:-- P' • • , ,- , �w .. .,...\ TABULATION Site Area 187,922 SF. ,\ -, .0,,, \ Bu®dh9 Area Gross 93,170 S.F.- Footpdnt 68A00 SF. \ Coverage 36AX \\\''\ `,`` Fat.e 44 - Compact Padcln9 Y - \ �• . Total Pak(n9 202 ...,. .:....,ffi .moo..® ,..., ' Parking glitred,171,21.:',11311:0 • ,i 113 • co OPtio,al oo /' Future Phase II V) O) iii 1 8Nt CO Q C \\ - •m..,u..00,..a„.o..•.,•,.....a.,..,............. ILL W Q 0: _ �BS2'a 100fi3Y rAff —" fia,a°`✓s15roo'E ."—"" LEGAL DESCRIPTION II ' II N F5`' I .._11I II I: c ` �, 4 _•�YNA. Phase I c ,` 9# . wI - I ` �t a ------it � vE a, I- 6eTvee^ue=x 1 I / —_\\ Ili I� G *,w _ C 4 a 1' '. �, 2S �e'rllr.11svn.r.e w,+✓ 1`: r i�Y I wd� �a-.vb ; •- Iy7 xo qr 7NoRo+.l P sotto.v/1iw. _ mo [ iI_ �l � 1 / 4 _ t m - ADMAC Building g iiill m m VICINITY MAP No Scale a. . mw -- '- •L 1b �l llik, Oro'-N M - . ocoe acrt L-I rnP New puore FN I IIIIIIII. iMllip ,CEX��___ ::s J W _ ' Reserve tAS IVWCIJ-e.p. • 4MM 01MEpsi--_- i pnYaQi. Future Parking Rw / i N�El• �� Ce •w',r�l - :: --(44 kraal-- LI g.la •.Ith' s� sa fia io xn,kxu a SITE PLAN 1 scape c1PJ Landscape• - 'A !10,011M-p AINNI 04 - 1----1,m 6.14.•ak-t. <_--ii-- i...,. .. ...,_ -411•41411 :041.L.. ...2.--r72: -- - --. -- r,; oP-i�veY y z. .. ep dKep�v ' ...�' m JIc ,� n__-.__ —_ _._____� lPT I + I o re��s-sae.86007 steer NO or • SITE PLAN 1/301 DRAWN.pc, I A..1 CNedt. • y I - _-__ Z N H - 1 :Ill11 s — 7: • _ 0 Il . r> r .. O '...,. II .i...".r !11 • I ■ 1 • 141 ■,I■1 i , i■ ■i _ _ _ I.... i - - I._._ - - I._._ __ I._._ — — I■_■_ _ _ �■M■� - — - MEMO!. - - • �m — — nimi . .:I — - _. 1 H H T T T 1 __,.. I .1, 9 6n A W N b t $ • First City Equities ', BlackRiver Corporate Park n ADMAC Building N b • Renton,Washington• a ae 14. !c} 1 . ' §. NACHES AVE.SW • • �- '_,ir.._-r--mow -'i':-'• - ' 1 ._4 w' =; • irn� • ��r• �. TA,III Gigr' I--) kii\ liki0.:)... 1 , :104 4, ..• ..•;:/:' f'.;',' 0 - It 1 I it 111�' ,, . it 1p ' 1 4 i . .. :_. - „ 6. . , '11 'L SI••i 1 ri •-I 40.1..,,,,,,f,..,1),1,.144d— vtiW•r�'r' ) r. AIIII � I(f!!� A,,�oi .��-�. I1 Is� K is :lit,f::,..,,4-1. :. .,.. AO. 0 gilt:• 'rk. •:. 1 :is • 1I' iyiy�d .. _;4b•S',041ttli 00, a „.\ . , ,,,,otut.A i p / •'•i4'',t, I o . i . ff„itik .9 4*- I t . . . . d _ .. i I t I . :1 j-' , . d POWELL AVE. •1111 iS E i\= 11 ma rt First City Equities $ e;• I. a Z . BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK imam I � w E ADMAG • I•, ea � � Renton,Washington r Ns \ FRWnE \ p • 4 g\ sou �z _�--�.o ri rt o W n%2 \\ \\ `\ '>_ ` .. I oy ` — ` — I — �' — — U s I \ �GEMPaaNRY ` w \ VARIANCE Z—cs o \ E-SAG SECTION A-A , /'` \. ¢ c \ \ SCALE 1'=10'-0" '// SITE \ > - cc m \ I I WY12 =m \ Wz J \ \ METRODISPOSAL a F L ry= It-- \ . \, \ a a v VICINITY MAP • Z L—' \ SCALE 1"=600' - - X g - F EMERGENCY ARE LANE ._ \ Izo L- �ERvicE [J ``\-` R 0 purv�E \\ LI W raEiys wq_ Q L 1 i' \, O w Eao '\ Z x 1 cc z ; ' ADMAC �- Y 0 0 I o LiJ w ci_< AI a s \- > - 1 TI l/ cc J 4a .r WIY U I O now. Ea zo as Ea led Q Q Z rta \ PRINTED _J= I GuruRE vucnNa (a«sr.us) I � \ of ___ —_J&' �\,. _______� JUN 9198E = m 1 --SO.LINOycAPE Aucsr c. • \ /� ,� • \ - C.)' -- --. - FJCTY LINE- j Z PPOP w...o.. F---T-- -- -- -- -- '/ . ^I --30'EXISTING EASEMENT--\ / --\ -- -- --- .D7 — DRH 5 PLAT OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER 50' 6 9-86 MEi w Row. I �86114.01 POWELL AVE.S.W. ~_ ,, ‘,..„i•,:,,n) 1,1-1P-kit-i -rot-4 :• :,...,,,,„Ye,' _____ — ——___ _,__ s HOP:1HO g'H FA'1/g‘?6•49 I ';''2..,:`;':',''.4:----- "--- .•••'''' ......'-' C,_ .5•104• 16.../.. .....--.4 v.'.• It714}V'r::t. • / Z'C' --__ - N \ • P1. 1119 11'4 ' ! 'i.,.:','.:•/:': : / /f\> *1--r i..0A-rir-1 ./. / VARIANCE Z . 0 TO SE— C-1-70N—1ST: ) ,v I1 SUMPAER ' c.. 4 V &W ..1 2 /- 4) 42 14 - \Q .. "‘P-----7--------------------_____________ V •44 •2. LID 32 6 n S w . to •)(. W N > 4 W CP It/ • < METRO o , , , 1 , 3 T 0 I- : ,,- DISPOSAL ,A i 0 , %St % — -------- , .. ....---------- 2 ; o ___------ g.,'• 6. •''''';'. i' 'IV-At :•';';''.1.1 • ,4' ..,...'''.?:' _____________ •••:•;.0,0•••••••••••00 . .1 44•-:'il a ..,;:,;.. . , ...,f , . VICINITY MAP. ,,,,,. N ro r3, 1,1 vi t• t, 1,1 ,. ,. . SCALE : 1„ = 60 0' • ii, ri 1 , , JUN 1 0 1986 ---- . ..,,,,,,,„; :,.... ;::,-,y;-,1,, ,, , :.•i:,,;:, , -::.,..:.'2,,,,: ; ,,,';i-,,. ::-,,_.;-:,;,-..; --;. t.''', ' ' '-'''-- ', ., --.. '‘ -'-• .: ," . ': ,..,:7';.1.:;,,e'.:;i:::: ;.,:r:-1,'''' '';.., , .,. .c. II •.. . • .,-. •-isorfarg#41% _" eel. rill--41 1 i li i IILLit, . . .r . I. ...., 401 . . ••• . .toterfh ,,, i 0 • • • 110-49141 ;----x' iir— • '" NiP ePt . W._, " ,,,ir ". ' •, , .- ..." '—`10:!14r#' --:„,„114..„0. 444A' --- - . . . 4.4,..-b.iii\' If‘ • , •7 ''''5.‘,..••••kiki•ev_r_."100. ..t.'” .),..,,,-4 -.,,, i't • . • •,'" t ..d9 '1 ''''In ''''-'='. ''..."' ''''+';'‘'.2.r. 00 4 ' 4'vf• ' SITE, ... ,..., 44•4 1.,,,,. s .44,:.4:11.,i,:,, ,,,, ,_.•'..,„,,,r,h.. .4,40s.,...4,-.:0',,,,,,...tim erg. , .,.. . mu_ • •. . ,r,1.4.: :-.:-‘,. „ -.4 ,,•,-• .-. ?'I----' --,),. AINNION ""E', l'ktN.',*"' ' ':'•1:‘.1 r30• '''''',?1`1 PI"IL 1 Oa% .,.. "` " ''-' . , iTk.-**610111 , ""•"7" .rtt " .4J; .4 r, .,.' ,tt:- .1'• 't Ape;v..... < • .' .' ----T-1 tr.,"4-ts-,- . •,-•• 1,,,,--4,,,.&-•.;- 4„,_7,0,i/j,„.: ,„,,—- , ,t6 1 i -0( .- •";- -- • --- . ,.,..- ..„0,,l•-4..."1- , ' --.. -ft........41fte. ''',— 10.-t, •r• •- $,,. • . ., •• . • • •• . . 1 • • i • . . . • ..:/ ./,'r AR-40:,- •,..-F1` 44,...,'"?"Ia--4.- - . e.7.---..---- - 1 ., ,' • rig- r- .. ifl . , - .... - . ... . ' ? ,1 ,•••t.,e4V s'..ft! '-4i01' - ',---•.. : ---..-- : - I, ,:• •4,,,44.112y, ei., is ... , lia Imam . r,-.=.7-' --,.,%ie:4-:W,,/ ?,-,7.7.4,ke,,, .,:- '''''.,'47;..-‘. ''',.-it'l • - ' '.*-44-:'," : ' . , . -1 ogee 1 • . - . . •DO. -Filorin .'"...,..,,.../._, .%.,,,,,,, . , •-•,4 ,• -,. -.<- . . ...- - ":-'...,.s.,4. .- ;, ....V P*-- i,.,. ...6,\•--..”. '',1,t . , .., .!' L............,.. . ,..- . • : I I' — : ...... _:::-,-.\ . . :•,..1 ,.-,t.',1 4'..r-ly...,,, ••,,: ....,.......,-,.t.,,..,;".--1.14.....: .••••• . .--,,ti,,,,- " " - -*' •,'1 t• :i' ' it.:,' oroje_.40.. t'• oll7 •,, - 4 .: . ...•.. ,I r.• , ......1,,,____•_..L...i.. ‘, • r,„ - - D.:4..zr.'4,-:'•.4F'''''.* -"I ' ''''''''. .a,: *•, * - ,;. . •,' , r •..-• - ‘. „„. „_.. . -r. -- ...,,-..0. 14 Ok,°,14V,'.41:c41, ,x,4 li, ' • ! '',/ • '. --'...• I ' / ' ' •-,- 4•'''. • - -• \ ' ,,. ',, . 4''• - . , '''.."•""---__144,Z2.0e, • . .1:.,i; „1„,.„ ,.... , d. ; .,.„„),. .. , ill . -- 1, - ,.,,„,,,,,,:, •/,,,,,r.,,,, ,, .,,,,, ,,,,, , . . ; % 1 illt",.A.k,:, ' „, L._.1 i • ,.., .„.., .71,,,„ ,, /4!".„, •,,:„. ,, .I T" ""-• •r" 1, ". • • ..., • ' 7th.‘ -- ;---. -a. .., , .. ,., , i.,:-, ..-. .• k ,- . • , • - - ... - .v. i.r" ••4 . III% ' • .,'.- 4." • . ____- ' - -•''..-!'!"•-••••• • i'filv- itt,- ,•••' 1 1 , 4'4,1,1,‘,..,„,. : N '''•,, '•-/ #14 ' -- / !__i . . ., . I •• • •-----4-- pt- a., ,.... •, . ... -- . --kt.!-.•,,, ,,e,•:; ••,, ,N. -,- , , f---I '17,1‘;' 1 '., •; ., .. ''' '1' i i . . -• '' ,V 'i I 1 I I .... \\\ in i 1 , . ! ...._ ••-•-_-•-• I.: ill' .• •4 . . ni ! 1 1 I Powell Ave! Conceptual Master Plan • w ,.; ‘,.., %,,...,e, •.•....e.$ ,,.2 : .,A• _...,, 1,,, . . I .. BlackRiver Va I .. A A..„': Corporate Park . ' VALLEY 405 , k'.,, ', ''' ' • • • . .._--....,.. -•,.• ' -•, ' ' . • 44, .* . .. .. • • • : 1 we • Islip!'• . ., , • . ., RENTON, WASHINGTON 1 ... f-- I f ti.14- A', .. 416 • ,' , ', , . I• . 1 I.• , '.. I I .Wi., . .,., ,.. CH'Ill OF ritN.TO . w- r="\ . .,...• 4 4 r Ill \Ill 1?' 'p in ' nT:a.ITLY EQUITIES ". . , ,\ , , 71. . .. ,*It4 ,'1(1, 1 .`. . . ,., ... ; 6 -----1 LEASON POMEROY NORTHWEST Grady Way 10198 niatE2!-„,.,..insP"-.9!!-PPp• • i-,' ' ''4,. ,.\-.• 1 ;ps '4'T ....'''' . 1 r, r.-,F.-^:'r "LDING/ZONINu .-,•,v- ,. •,.`f ,.,,,,,,o,"."' ''• Ahil i•,,, -- 405 . ., _ .• • ...•• '... h b' 11'44. ®� Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle • Exchange Bldg. • 821 Second Ave.,Seattle,Washington 98104 August 4, 1986 ,. ITEM NO. j,- 0s- 7- �� ...� Barbara Moss Director of Planning First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 RE: Blackriver Corporate Park Transportation Management Plan Dear Barbara: I wanted to take the opportunity to applaud your work on the Transportation Management Plan for the Blackriver Corporate Park development. Thank you, • too, for the opportunity to review and comment. That you have done such a comprehensive job as a voluntary measure is commendable. The development of a structure and designation of personnel to assure that the Plan is carried out are two pieces that we have found essential to a successful effort. Your provisions for a .person from First City Equities to serve as the Employee Trans- portation Coordinator, for a Transportation Coordinator at each business, and for a possible Management Committee in the future address these aspects very well. The long term key to the success of this effort, of course, will be dependent on its being implemented over time and possibly through subsequent owners. We look forward to working with you and the City of Renton to assure the success of your Transporta- tion Management Plan. Sincerely, Carol S. Thompson Market Development Planner CST: jn cc: Kathe Allen, First City Equities Bill Roach, Supervisor, Market Development Gary Norris, Traffic Engineer, City of Renton . r . GUIDELINES FOR THE . . • TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN ' OF . BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK - RENTON' : . . The property shown on the photograph, which is hereto attached and incorporated by reference , is commonly known as BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK (BCP) . This Transportation Management Plan (TMP ) is designed to address BCP ' s transportation needs , and their impact on the City of Renton. BCP is collectively owned by First City Equities ( FCE) , a Washington State General Partnership, and First City Developments Corporation (.FCDC) , a Washington State Corporation. The intent of the TMP is to encourage the reduction of single-occupant vehicle trips to and from the site during peak hours and, as a result , reduce daily vehicle trips impacting the roadway system in the vicinity of the park. It has been determined that the following Guidelines for • implementation are consistent with the foregoing objectives. FCE shall periodically consult with King County Metro Commuter Pool Staff to provide services and assistance in implementing elements of the TMP. • ADMINISTRATION FCE shall administer the TMP. The TMP shall be coordinated .. and directed by an individual designated by FCE. Initially, . said individual will be Kathye Allen, Property Manager for • • BCP, Kathye Allen will hereinafter be referred to as Employee • Transportation Coordinator '(ETC ) . • The ETC of the TMP may exercise all those duties and functions which area specified or implied by. this TMP. The powers shall include establishing and/or revising reasonable guidelines of the TMP, with the cooperation of the City of Renton and Metro. The ETC will request each lessee to designate an individual as the lessee ' s Transportation Coordinator (TC) , who will be asked to provide information as requested by the ETC. Duties of the TC are outlined below. If, at some time in the future, FCE determines the need and chooses to select a Management Committee, it shall have the power to do so. When the Management Committee is selected, the tenants shall be offered the opportunity to serve on it , at least in an advisory and representational capacity. At that time , the selection process , size and scope of the Management Committee shall be determined by FCE. The Management Committee shall be coordinated and directed by the individual chosen by FCE as the ETC . DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR (ETC ) 1. Shall incorporate the following information in the Tenants Manual: A. Information covering alternative transportation methods ( i.e. , location of Metro bus stops and routes , ride share information, etc. ) . B. Ride-matching applications for the carpool program, • to be provided by Metro: - C. A memo, incorporating information provided by Metro, which encourages employers to consider: 1. transit pass subsidies as an employee bonus; and 2 . fleetride, in which an employer allows company cars to be used by employees for commuter carpools during the morning and afternoon. D. Memo itemizing the benefits of flex-time. E. Memo which encourages employers to participate in dedicated and/or subsidized vanpool or paratransit programs , to the extent such programs exist . 2 . Work with Metro to establish new bus routes or modify existing bus routes to pass by or through BCP . 3 . Provide Metro notification of employer occupancy dates and resulting estimated employee numbers on an ongoing basis . 4 . Cooperate with Metro in Metro ' s efforts to provide , install, and maintain at least one ( 1 ) "Commuter Information Center" (CIC) in an accessible and highly visible common area. The CIC will provide information on transportation alternatives . The location of the CIC shall be chosen solely by the ETC. 5 . Survey employers and employees on an annual basis to determine ( 1 ) the effectiveness of the TMP, and ( 2 ) provide Metro with the number of employees using H.O.V. (High Occupancy Vehicle ) modes . The ETC shall reveal the results of said survey to Metro. METRO • . 1. Provide information materials to the ETC as well as stock the CIC. 2 . Provide technical assistance and training in developing information systems , parking management programs , flex- time benefit information and promotional programs . 3 . When requested, advise the ETC of surveying, monitoring and evaluating program' s effectiveness. 4. Make public vanpools (paratransit ) available on a first come, first-served basis when they are available and when demand is present . 5. Provide ride-matching information and services for cars/ vanpools . 6. Investigate the potential coordination of employees of nearby sites for participation in a collective TMP, if desired or necessary. TRANSPORTATION COORDINATOR (TC ) 1. Maintain and provide ETC with a list of companies ' times of operation and employee count . This will assist the ETC and Metro in their efforts to monitor BCP ' s public transit needs . 2 . Distribute an opinion survey, provided by Metro, to determine the demand for vanpool and other transit modes annually. 3 . Periodically distribute information which encourages employers to consider transit pass subsidies as an employee bonus as well as the benefits of flex-time work schedules . 4 . Provide Metro ' s ride-match applicatons to employees on • v .a periodic basis . • - MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The duties , powers and responsibilities of the Management Committee shall be determined and outlined at the time that FCE determines a committee As- viable. It is agreed that FCE shall have the sole power to modify and implement this TMP. However, FCE agrees that , if and when it modifies this TMP, FCE will: 1. keep the spirit of this TMP in mind, and 2 . consult with Metro for its input on the modifications. • To the extent that FCE and/or FCDC sell all or part of the BCP to other parties , the new owners shall not be bound to comply with the terms of this TMP.-However, FCE agrees that it will explain the benefits of this TMP and encourage any new owners to cooperate with Metro in incorporating a similar document for their purchased property. R I • •lF • • P . •l • .e, . ,..„ , i; . . .., • • :I, v. . . • . i • ei...k v. 1.,:: t) •,:...ek ,, .,,,,,........ 1 .,--.,-., ,a ,,, „, ,,,1 ,,, . • , 0 . : i N s. CZi ., ii t t i fm � y.. �` x +o � ; zoom..i" 1 `� %OI l � .� . A 1 f3 I� b • A-,_ ; � f ~ � l ��a-. n .•.. ,,. il , ,,•. . 0 CD ' , 1.0 (' ' �.. L /� o 04 ' .' 4 112)7P:?'.41kb?. 4:.."0 .i'd ' 1 QI61;1S•*; 1:g4f0 Poo,c61::{,s4 . : A'S 17(0 .046,7 .,,,,,, .1 ,..? ';•;. AD I:. ':\; . 3D7 ,, .1.ii i)..ttbS(12.6 4 .4•-Ar, ,...t 090,\1 ‘ 0 • ' iii;..,,,.?'1'UZ.:•/:S(•,.. tb_. % • , t: / ...-vi 4 .trmi .§A ... , • •47 ..., 0,,a _. .ci, .•-/ 71.,i ,, , . I 'TA. V 0 ;II 1.0•es,:,..L1L+70 il--'111,V,V,ij , , tli ( I s• :...Vtia„ , .,,,i'1 ViAhrie,tm:-..0,• ‘11 • vas ! 'f ._ �, ti._.,'" ,. �1 ,f..i. \ - • ..o.r..:„......a ;14' •• J`An_,Cal - -•• / `� �� ,l• ,',• � 'b- I "Obi.•, \ \ t .0e,, .r..!Ali' •,, ..,i, it,. .\ \ n .$.i:,. ;if' 4;4.,,,,,, ,...'"i. c...j.(Zi'......, I& . . .I.S., c' treaq, 0.1?, :1. , • \ •-•. \ , ,, . — uf‘-,/ .1.r...!,...itINCSI(`;.es'zilit.,""... -ke... •---.::—.1 .. . i,.. ; ,, •zzi. 6'.t.w.e.'4,,,,(.4-0, tit 3 1, 1. • «�:,'. •j�.'f!! 1 ti. :� tb' �Q n4j •'" • xi ir ,.. , ... .,A,N.r a8. • 'J '�, _air 1 ....:,."- 0;)34 ''g '34) • i 1+ I. •\ ..‘" ;It I,' . :'G) ' i : ) .1,td.aelig_...,'' ..r.1"...cps.----_ via, / bop : •:•'' •,, •,l. .. '.• ..,,ri- it .--..... . .., ,..,: 4...• ,ecb(1110(9 .(' / �\ �, , � » IIA f�/ j f.' el.,,-7--.N. �� ,1�, ,5i ,� Q 1a • 4�{aea�j��[ 4k. r, 0 `+..;.?• i , ',' 4 N� � -I/1~� 3J��.�t.►i! n�� 6 ' �•� �d''n .�1' l G .+` kip't61 ,+�•O ®'.u Y v �.'J eiY to Q �, ,�►�, ..'d8°� <f. 11`/'. fir►�:•' ^'� -�at+t„� iflu' `�i { `+t!�� •.��J✓% 4 -' r !` v• O • �tt v.. ..' %.., •-•'•i, •. 1. O ''0.0- ..`4�v. ��:� ��4.4"0.. 'INO+ku. t ,_• u I, ,4',,t1 s f d' 0 ,/ �`� •Dq - tN or,d• Imo' / • fr o sy O`D ...�,:i�f*l� /" vC ql' ' _ ►, r •c{',+9!a s r_' �{ �vw•^..i►— U�,,r!�' • 7 • ! Q2 • ' v :.."n '.j. . �pi�a.'La. `{,:pp a . Z.. t" . NT ' I y i 10y®pW a.�t� �. /,I�1„ ...-,. ai/ •, ► • .. I �•lSp 0441y_t,A ,14 �t e: p. 1 �f ' \ � r ; ' s +_� ^s ,�• l�_ - -• v . .- :=v : %t • + y� p?�� !G ..;.cter,.ign..•..:�.�6 !,!��;1. .vT. a „3 .i +emu). 11?4.4)4\ a.i.•• •• •••••. '''''',,,,9‘0' ..... - 4r.:59 c:9-• .) ' \ . v t' 0.4. .:. •: : 0,,, 0 .0..a., 8 ll.ceaDdif'" ' 'i j:11 -1 , ,, . 441 Fl. l • sw • i 'Y1fi�+ngc `•;d+op.irb , _r_.1{' "P ', �."�1aii�� Fii,,,j Vflf,tt • .� •¢P \ cl ' V,3 40. .ti, ,...T.7:47,71.)00-:!..,t- : L I • ir, • ......-:, -., .• vilitr,ft . ,......:58 A ,1 . •••,.. )•.,,, i 1.\ • i re'VW i....1.,,,, 0 •• „sir •.6 ,v,..-, ,,, -,....."".. .,....,,- ..:„ _., s__________., ,____________, .._ ,........ . . . ,,, ..1i4.;,e, , 0 ,., , ..___ ,,i( ,. . • i \. \,, • • 1 i &c.. ."." • • .i; ....... I •°••"w a .°a g BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE MICROFILMS O .,ut 13 (1 - 257- 86 �- ,- � t. ., •: :i., Utilr FIRCI. / SCHUMAN Unie ; JI79z2. , oy3q July 18, 1986 Mr. Ronald L. Olsen _ f •T �. , (� • CITY OF RENTON ��^ p .= y - S -. 0 .fir g ?4, Public Works Dept. `• 1 �i' a S Utility Engineering _ •_•. 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 • : Re: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK Sewer and Water Development Charges Dear Ron: _ .. In response to your letter of June 10, 1986 concerning sewer.._,. and water development charges on the above referenced project, I enclose for your use a map prepared by Bush, Roed & Hitchings with area calculations of the ADMAC site (187,922 s.f. ) and of the entire Black River building area which includes the ADMAC site (2,000,458 s.f. ).. ' Since -.I do not know how future phases will be demised on the • property,-- I' am only prepared now to commit to the ADMAC division._ We would be responsible for the 187,922 s.f. area at . the time the ADMAC utilities are connected. My understanding based on our conversation of a couple of weeks ago is that as I proceed with development on the Black River property, I can provide you with an updated map, such as the one included here, which will include area calculations for each subsequent phase, with the understanding that the total sewer and water development charges will be based on the total building area of the property (2,000,458 s.f. ) If you have any questions concerning the calculations or my logic, please contact me at my office. Otherwise, I will assume we are proceeding on this basis. Thank you for your willingness 800 Fifth Avenue-Suite 4170•Seattle,Washington 98104•(206)624-9223 Mr. Ronald L. 01 July 18, 1986 Page Two • to let us pay the development charges on a phased basis. Warm Regards, ' 1, • , FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM/dlp cc: Elliott Severson w/attach. • . Greg Byler _ _ - • , • , • s ,-._ - • .-- • • ., - • - - • • - • • _ • • • . . . - • . • • • R. ,e EA5 of B1 AC/f,e/Ve TEccNOLOGY • • TOrAL A,E461/7c/f,c/es ,avice/s e .4, B e o) 3,//5,373 s9. zlz Green 6e/t 1/e/%.v1s f F/ooI Con tiro/ Q/Cis 8�f fj 69 S q-�T e A. ,Pr o/ore41 f/a/ e,' 44n 9 d t So. /i.7e cl p4rCe/ C . S"8) 2 ZD sp.>7 S 2/D, /oO S . osed �D /044� p (1 Ap,IAC s/fe /87, 9-Z2 $7. - d We/ 6t-./d;7 Area- (e,cc/..der y•een�e/iJ�.✓G//n.rds� QdC4S I ',w/osed road /„p/4AeiPS AP,141-C s) le) 2, 00 Y5.8 Si. •T v czau .4*e III • n • ° a..o• PA./ELL s4, 5-C4/C : / : SOO / FaST c/rV Si,s///N,a, g/4c 4 ,P/✓e." e-c 4 o/h yy PQ.,e OZ.,/ No. 951F.%// Tv.Gj /G/ /f B6 BUSH, F1OED & IIITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL rNGINr[:[1S & l AND tU1\1 YOBS • • NOTICE OF AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE .o Audrey De Joi e duly RENTON, WASHINGTON , beingfirst sworn on oath states that The Environmental Review Committee he/she is the Chief Clerk of the (ERC) has issued a declaration of non significance for the following projects with .i additional conditions imposed as mitigat- ing measures under their authority of VALLEY NEWSPAPERS Code:n 4-2822(D)of the Renton Municipal Code: FIRST CITY EQUITIES(ECF-050-86) Daily News Journal, Daily Record Chronicle, Daily Globe News Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers having 93,170 square feet for office, are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six manufacturing and warehouse uses, file months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published SA-057-86, and variance application to in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500' County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal feet,file V-058-86.Property located on the newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 500tblock • of Neches Avenue S.W. at the King County. Further information regarding this action is available in the"Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Journal , Daily Record Chronicle X , Daily Globe News , (and Hearing Examiner by July 31, 1986. not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its July 17, 1986.in the 19ily Record Chronicle 17, R1719 subscribers during the below stated period. The annexed notice a • •, tice of Environmental Determination was published • on July 17, 1986 R1719 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$ 20.79 Subscribed and sworn to before me this �3rd day of July 19 86 Notary 41!,lic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, VN rei Revised 10/84 King County, Washington. • I` � r C f tQyU NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION COUN- CILHIS REGULAR CHAMBERS EONG THE IN HS EOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 5, 1986,AT AudreyDeJoi a 9:00 A.M.TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOW- ING, being first duly sworn on oath states that PETITIONS: he/she is the Chief Clerk of the PLAID PANTRY Application for conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a B , Business VALLEY NEWSPAPERS P Use, zone as part of a Plaid Pantry store,file CU-015-86;property located DailyaNews Journal, DailyRecord Chronicle, DailyGlobe News Avenuet the N.E. and corner t Union .E. and N.E. Sunset Blvd. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers FIRST CITY EQUITIES legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six Application ns two plan approval to are allow the construction of a story months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published building having 93,170 square feet for in the English language continuallyas dailynewspapers in Kingoffice,sfile manufacturing; and warehouse gKent, use, 5A-057-86;and variance appti- County, Washington. Valley Newspapers have been approved as legal caticn to allow a cul-de-sac road length newspapers by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for over 500 feet, file V-058-86. Property located on the east side of Naches King County. Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Daily News above are on file in the Renton Building and Journal DailyRecord Chronicle X DailyGlobe News and Zoning Department. , , ( All interested persons to said petitions not in supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its are invited to be present at the public subscribers duringthe below statedperiod. The annexed notice a hearing on August 5, 1986,at 9:00 a.m.to express their opinions. Notice of Public Hearing was published Ronald G. Nelson rector on July �s 1986 R17)10 Building and Zoning CDhronicle Published in the Daily Record Chronicle July 25, 1988. R1740 The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of $26.73 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 29th day of July 19 86 7 , • lVL Notary blic for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. — ,CITY C. ;;,'n n:.l VN#87 Revised 10/84 pl 1 �� L Il � AUG 71986 BUILDING/ZONiNNG DEFT 1 r 3253Z NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND 1HE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: SA-057-86, V-058-86 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story building haveing 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, and variance application to allow a CUL-DE-SAC Road length over 500 feet. GENERAL LOCATION: Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 Block. PUBLIC APPROVALS: Site Plan Approval Variance Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. CERTIFICATION I, JERRY F. LIND, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in FF'NTOh/ if ikFS C. 1 on the 2/TN day of t4� pr oN QOw ,a 1424042;tccetiiro;V:0-A SIGNED: i o ol f...:..•,16�, z_ WASN�,,i i -' Ub `I 0- oaS-�� ( FIRST CITY EQUITIES November 19, 1986 CITY 07 �v arD�� Ms. Jeanette Samack-McKague @LdTE CITY OF RENTON Building Department NOV 1;ige6 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 8UILDiNG/ZONING L) PT, RE: ADMAC Building Permit BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Dear Jeanette: Per our telephone conversation of yesterday, enclosed please find the Exhibit 1 ( legal description of the Blackriver Technology Park property) and Exhibit 2 (the 60 foot wide right-of-way legal description) . Also enclosed is the boundary and topographic survey prepared by BRH dated 5/19/86 with revision date of 5/30/86 on which is outlined the 60 foot proposed roadway throughout the Blackriver Park for Naches Avenue as currently proposed. By copy of this letter I am forwarding those exhibits as well as maps to Fred Kaufman and to the City Attorney, Larry Warren. (Larry' s maps will be coming under separate cover directly from Bush, Roed, and Hitchings. ) If this agreement is acceptable to all parties, please advise me and Mr. Jim Hansen, of the Building Department, in order for my 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170 Seattle,Washington 98104•(206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments VL Ms. Jeanette Samack-McKague November 18, 1986 Page Two ADMAC Building Permit to be issued. We are ready to begin construction on that property and appreciate your review and comments as soon as possible. Warm regards, FIRST CITY EQUITIES c4eLtet-Ae-- tC%'• /.031V4---'! Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM:bc Enclosures cc: Royce Berg Robert Roed Greg Byler Fred Kaufman w/encl. Larry Warren ADDED AGENDA ITEMS APPROVAL REQUIRED - MODIFIED SITE PLAN ECF-064-86 BERKLEY STRUCTURES, INC. SA-072-86 Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building which will house laboratories on the first floor and office space on the second floor; located at the southwest intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 39th Street. Modifications include parking, outside storage, isles and fire access. ECF-050-86 FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-057-86 Appliation for site plan approval to construct two V-058-86 story office/warehouse building having 93,170 square feet. Property located at 500 block of Natches Avenue S.W. Modifications include fire access. 3237Z • Q .• ' 1,, _: . ,;., i•a' T r''_.�-�•r%,�,.-'ra.!'"-'x•..."•. '^.I7� ,F.i=Y::`'i e A�.;-.�';.. �:`•; '��'i '?-•'.'. - -..5.•:�d,�z. - ';;i'.:•R_ � y-.:,•yd,.-�'5 ,J•y=Y;" -.)• '1,,: -.4 (3--. t• • n . ' • ~ a •`9 . _�'--'�?.'fw �.cy.Ir •f �'' `re^• " • ; 1 ' � IX y ..,• "i .t.. �� ,. v - _ i."�: ,r-�: "'r%,-:Jk;r.",;,..'i 4"',?•—,:.. ..4'-:. ;:•3,.,•<i''',,, � ~:��•k`I b4 i.,i6..+4 z..,.- .l.':•N y�.•, '., C.:.hG!b_ T • m®/o� . d9A `' ,�Yh ,fy:P- r •v'+ 'r"._ c, ;c :,;,r t;lid�..,, ,.;-:,-4-`::,;. ,T+ ftX..°t :'T,t.`v74'•••zftliY.•,- "f,'.:' c :l•.+',� ' l•,:: ) Q " v- 07, �. K* _'.:��a" .- ;_.=tz ;' ••.r'.. e - ' "� 4 ,a�rvL.'""ik*�.. . ;�s••-^ :1 7*u' F,S..t;. kv''`�Y'�s+..,4•<,n_<i: .-`'1 a:. ' a;V Y . • ;l .' % .,,. G, ® � E� e1 k .;.' �^ y w ih,,n : r $�t} :^ w, .f ' a•`r� { r � `� �• - ua � ' f. �y �„• _ � ,V 0 -F, ;} f ; �= f -Mfi 4� �. -A"R ST4.-;4 If,Y_N t4-f-j :,Ya�:�.- Y N, a;•:.:-4 _:t4��w.Yr�p.f':y:'a'- 1 s_ s w. '`i am�i;>h, �ytr. i r';< ��r:ti- ate,r , ^ �':1`14� _c �-;; ''^.s'" t..p�tiAv.w.;w r°r , xt^ 31u4:•.•,?• �i`��' � hi3� � .n r :�`tctV?cx4• er�i '• `.,, „.x r,, c�,•: h,. f�� :� � - n. .tira- _ 4? -t V �:,t- st4' 1Gec'. �' ; ri''f'+%ssyT 1"; •dy:h.'' ',. °,,•i: Z �; ki0�t'�x�� • � �. � - •• t4� i3 ��s�� l:�sir3��i4� :: > ,8�L.01, EXHIBIT 1 Page 3 Exhibit 'A' 1 Blackr}ver Technology Park 1 • Ord.: No. 652499 DESCRIPTION FOR PARCEL 1: PARCEL 1-A: That portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13. Township 23 North. Range 4 East W.M. ; AND of pert lattrecorded in Junction VolumeAddition of Plats, Page 75.Srecoords of ;/ as per plat - i TOGETHER WITH vacated streets adjoining which would attach to • // {' : said premises by operation of law; ap AND of Charles Brownell's Donation Claim No. 41; u5 AND of that portion of Tract 26 of Renton Shore Lands 2nd et) Supplemental described as follows: / - .-. . - • ! • N0.4 Beginning at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 13; ' CO thence North 00'58'28" East along the North --South centerline m - of said Section 13 a distance of 884.84 feet to the Southeast - � corner of Tract 26 of Renton Shorelands Second Supplemental • Maps. according to the unrecorded plat thereof; thence South 72'37'52" West along the South boundary of said ••y Tract 26 a distance of 382.60 feet; thence North 70°54'02" West along said South boundary of Tract 26 a distance of 73.50 feet to the East line of the Charles Brownell Donation Land Claim No. 41 and the true point of beginning; • - thence continuing North 70'54'02" West along said South boundary of Tract 26 a distance of 281.02 feet; thence South 73°56'O1" West along said South boundary of Tract 26 a distance of 130.08 feet; thence South 41'16'07" West along said South boundary of Tract 26 th ' I a deededatoe of King316.18 Countyfeet to the and describedrunderuKingy of a Countytract of Recordingand No. 6607786: thence Westerly along said North boundary on a curve to the left, the center of which bears South 39'41'39 ' West having a radius - of 627.46 feet an arc distance of 434.70 feet through a central • angle of 39'41'39"; thence North a distance of 25.00 feet along the North boundary ' of said King County tract; . - • thence West a distance of 280.69 feet along the North boundary; • - of said King County tract; • thence South 59°53'47" West along said North boundary a distance ' of 377.52 feet; tf thence South 74'13'19" West along said North boundary a distance , 1 of 443.31 feet to the Northerly margin of the Charles Monster County Road; thence North 34'18'31" West along said Northerly margin a distance of 43.46 feet to the South line of the Burlington Northern Railroad , ' ' right-of-way; i thence along a curve to the left along said South line, the center of which bears North 06'34'41" West having a radius of 696.00 feet, .. i - continued - 8 .1 � �.2.��r ,. �_" `t'� _.e.` � •ny +` �� .4--1;*e+2 $r'�." °h�.ar 1Y,Yf. ,awl} a`1<4. i ' ii'" ` 4R„,. ice« -• •�. s -e '�'P+,�taa ".'�"s•.'x,..„.!'".:41,‘,. a zS yr�lr.'" ‘,„,4,.„,,Y. 'I ,.R+r .Va`Z.'�4 t k i-v �„c'�^ �:-. L ,v�. ,o,,-.,•�'t›i:14r;.`•e..:. vej9 '''• Filed by TA $ .. �;.. :.. , . ., _ .�:.A. t. �. :• :. �,� {.7 ,. �-, --.�_.:s�rc .ilsi 'E:'.'r,—.t *A.• t '`w.x,.Kr v':• '"�'•a�-r.w .�¢'r. : ,. -;S e' l:'" :s -.i..+ .t-:.'' -'ems .q P,.•".CiF° �le _ _ -�' ti'a.s�-:,...�-• ..•di��• .C`,�'''-;V3,� -.C. C�"�i;t"" • `":�%+y3`'..;,.L� , %.C�^�•`. =c"a" :..,..r.ax .., s '+'`a'• - 1 .f..4•:�>, t .� . 'F.:7.r .--(te`"_; Rs`• -,r' r .:24 c-ai, rr"'`.:ri•i i.; ,e y_. . ,�:.�' ;a, ;°;^=i:::2}:;t• ` I. �'JF`T�"P�:C'r'^ +e' c: ti," : ':C"41Y-o a..."•::i'3TM; :P=' �' %J`< .a =. �i e.-v° :x • ';z .`K 3 :t'r' -"v..'�t..�-.b' t•" ma's.-,.,, �" .1.�..Nl:.-. �Nal., � s..yg°.i•....m ti-gyp' ..V' , ' .;,,':i !� .i.; i:- ..-1-u.,.',f� ",':,vi . ', ' sr�'Y* ,.t' 1A�• L f i`+r.m.•7.4.,' .P.4. 4 4•a . : ":._` y,^ ,di:^,j* R�,,., ...�si� u :!:�,r',w ��,7yt.-�-�� a: a..,,;.zf`F-•'•,e>:`- -1 s ,I:��,_r`8'',.rF:•�;,� sy�'.;- :. '�-��•';-:w.u" N} .'>xt•j{ti':;`:}•.eS- „xy,. ,.y.- -� d, -w�,.a'B �..3y"'�':e o,e;, ,S': �,clek z A.,tra r'w:af.,±'.. �,�E. -a t A. Sr.,�- ,1:r1;.r. � �i _r � .. ,. "r�.+'�. Y+ .,. �;. ';fit, 3u'-„•:,•� +.'• :. y,.�,y,1,., yv.,;�, � :rtt.r'as/+,krzi;:r-• ;gyp i�,.;:_z,*;� `-��7: "k"i•a�t`? xy a. g� ' �-_ ';�n`� �c:ePr•�•a'=h.X? C;�'-.r's•t� •E .>,ge_ T .r}w .r.' ,xi:a,�j'5.wt"�"':ice; _ '�� "1'. .��r, .s^•;�<A " a+r r � y'"i' t� '. �'' :F'. di-.,+:':-'•x'i'''.�''sF''• q+•' �`rg� �iyw�.jii�.. ''�'*'�'rE &f3.�'.q;� r^:��''�`s"�^:,�s c"'2+'d<e'sr ''%x:ea:."a' L :�.ag��,.t rn- ? �,^": y,- •'t ry,�.: a,,y..5ti=o z-S..}d•' �w„�i; .:,qi .!c•„.;1, :•.i4 ... Y'L-:; .o: ,Y ti :�^ .a'- ; ,,,� Lj'•�,W. 31.t., er--1�N';. 9 ,ka4, +la's 1, w ""—= Y 4 ::, �a :;•t - T4-.• r - a;: .;N.-tf- x;as'+"t'°>et4:,.,,, .yk � r °4.A�`""ram 'Liz �`'; r� �gam 4 .^,�„q °°r"°:P y"�;'�''�. ;^ ^,:�+'��tr�>,y;., c �Ka;. �a.1,'.�'�''r`'�`x: L�'.Y;Ji.�`•'"a � ?s;;,�. `;.s#,, M �-� -� . �? Lei 2 i -- f,, ''e44Sr e.'il . 4` t r....,gs q z? m{ l'r " `' Via' . F'r ;-.. • .. `tea-' :•" '5 .� yC •- y' #y z X" '4 - � � �•a 3``,'4 =^� ?7- `4 •f="m^^ '...' "t( ``' "'✓ s r r`'kaap� x 'g:, .: 9 r..+w t l'" "r ••4y� '.,ti. .{ •t^r#•..�_`�j' " ,y" I! •.'! - v -,ice .zris`53 +°�_` ". ii • igli Page 4 i Order No. 652499 DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1-A (continued): ' i an arc distance of 45.43 feet through a central angle of ' 03°44'25" to a point of compound curve; thence along a curve to the left along said South line, the center of which bears North 10'19'06" West having a radius 17 of 1,055.00 feet an arc distance of 209.95 feet through a '.-:. .- / : central angle of 11'24'08" to a point of compound curve; thence along a curve to the left along said South line, the _ center of which bears North 21°43'14" West having a radius of 727.00 feet, an arc distance of 214.77 feet through a central mangle of 16°55'35" to a point of compound curvet u9 thence along a curve to the left along said South line, the • / - center of which bears North -38'38'49" West having a radius of 1,571.00 feet an arc distance of 206.57 feet through a central 0angle of 07°32'02" to a point of tangency; - ., - ti thence North 43°49'09" East along said South line a distance of CD 97.17 feet to a line 35 feet Southerly of and parallel with the CO centerline of the existing most Southerly track of the Chicago. •, 1 Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Tracks; thence along said parallel line on a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 42'43'18" East having a radius of 696.89 feet, an arc distance of 40.09 feet through a central • angle of 03°17'45"; thence North 50'34'27" East along said parallel line a distance of 248.50 feet; thence along said parallel line on a curve to the right. the center of which bears South 39°25'33" East having a radius of • 676.58 feet, an arc distance of 93.64 feet through a central 1 • angle of 07'55'47" to a point of reverse curvet y thence along said parallel line on a curve to the left, the . center of which bears North 31'29'46" West having a radius of . : 428.64 feet, an arc distance of 73.32 feet through a central i angle of 09'48'04" to a point of reverse curve; ' thence along said parallel line on a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 41'17'50" East having a radius of 2,580.74 feet an arc distance of 437.40 feet through a central • - angle of 09°42'39" to a point of compound curvet • thence along said parallel line on a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 31'35'11" East having a radius of 2,790.19 feet an arc distance of 789.44 feet through a central 4. angle of 16°12'39" to the East line of the Charles Brownell Donation Land Claim No. 41; - i thence South 01'24'04" West along said East line a distance of t 950.58 feet to the true point of beginning; i S - continued - a -iS:°x x •,,w. .-�,..�.�. .. mo TA ,. „ 5.� f`.. g„"ta a>�'we 1 4,.4'Z.e,\°y::. f ;; _ •5 ti4,•:... fis ` OCT 4��'• Filed by vu, w'a.�. � 5 �,., :sy' 4�•,"rs •.144.�.,'a 4r: -��y'* `.",'a • a .f tit., MA ;.e' i.'•,t�� vtzw '�t=�f,'` 'k '_ > � e -- ...+�•. _ +...v.`C . 1 ��r ` _f�.14.--tLF• j PL ..'ti,j4 r.L.i.,� - l,..? Ste. ,� "�� t�A .t5:";.:ji:^4•t�.:..S.:l.•��.1r C-• ^71�'4 _-fi..1 - '!. "'.-;.. ,_ti ti�: •. 4'� �•;..: ':5.:" y4 u¢ --r+1.-r.;:;• Y y ;j,?.��';8>p��` .'., ,f r4 i.., • '.z.. <:s'ty.Y - •-,I�' ':'.se v'.a.t*.yi•.'�'`.�:l; _ •,;;..-.;.� r".•. ••;A i .�:.^�,r' p_" t."su _�. ..� `:��y��l• at • µµ•�k�1•` ri•s .w.{'��`t l',',`"<i o' :,a..-a.:••.?:�^ i =..�.- ..r..�1-,1v"-'.C"'..^b r�`°i - ° 'y i -+i ".'��,� - •ia.`}'Y " .. a_l -+.r•.r'•,-4`,e:, iqr�yh.:., Mry7; w- +._ 3 °`.1:::4 _'e„ :_l :•y -'>i',.i -.'a ,''Wit.9 4,"r :3,.;r' .} . ;y �'r{ *..�:'-��'',x�,..;,Y. J� � Z.�� ,K.� „�' ,vr:.` -� {�-'ti�=.e. �"'�-a'e-'`.1 } :�ti r'' 1 f'�`�' ` -'.n+� ..t rg'i-+i .Q.,4 i _ ^- 7" ':;. .,a•� '`/...H`•r.-•}?A- 1 r 1„7-�tr'K%'.,•.,s. :�.-t^-^"x'1 a �S: G..9-ta.- -' ?kr',e�;� �•`.�..t' :•_,4.t_"I�,n"s'+;_TP`i� - �'uW.. - _ �"i.'i(� t x. t.t:, 't'+r '`=`••f. •Yv1.,, e.C_ : .te.- p` x"y .ie' -=, t-..7 .4 "R J",%'' M,' • r r-�I•� .,�_.,� ...,.t1 e-" r'`"•i"'':5.pt:''', '�" "��+•,..., ,.,;y ..�•" i-c,�tit-'=:,'� i;.` Y i,_( x"T i. G-v, . .,...stJ!-+ :..t � !'?"'G .i:+Y +,d._ ,�.¢i�"td"; "3'•a` `-�ro� �+. r�y(,,.°.�§✓ ,•e,',.^,.,,•r.•..=„` L"'�,..-.�r, YJ�_vi '�.nr�d-a'�> .ef:,'rM .+y,`'" �. � ,�`•..�},�. --... {• +` ti-��..f%q..;i•, s�.`n`.��3h `.s:: ,. s C'T 4�: ';'. >, j•si•.,c"•"� :(. i�•t �•',! ,mob. ?�.. •>t r,� im, �'a' :�,+.i z,� ?:m' � ••1�_.�g. 5�/`. 1 2.1 1 V � - 4 aY ' y_ d {�.� . X1�.}4�"�i�•4� - n 'y:.. � t5�7•-��f Rf51L:{cJ i� '°',-' 'r*A <.• �' i1;, 1P. `.,,•4 ..:.*"_ �i7C ,,_ ? .:-.,A,- .,,,-�^ 1, 4., aa`y 'r..4 ......a,. • Ax.^- ' ., '?;s.� . -7° � - •ro N. • ..,- qy.e t 1{ `'ems i9r,,�c �..,'-' .,;; ..s •, _ $ o'3j a- err '.`�'•h'+`!: caus`'xrt&:! `lk.; a.•.c+',� ,:* .t};a • r .,6 r"r*C'`' . -5i- : a' _ i• 1 Page 5 o ! Order No. 652499 • `" DESCRIPTION (continued) : I _ PARCEL 1-B: I� That portion of Charles Brownell's Donation Claim No. 41. and of the Southwest g gd ee4SEasteWsM.1/4 of describedion 13, as follows: Township 23 North, g i Beginning at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 13; ! thence North 00° 'a8distance" East lofg884e84 th ofeet torth - othe Southeastuth ecorner /' of said Section 13 / " 1 ® of Tract 26 of Renton Shorelands Second Supplemental Maps. 1958; In thence South 72'37'52" West along the South boundary of said' I Tract 26 a distance of 382.60 feet; 1_ thence North C feet stot thenEastllined uof theth nCharles Brownell dary of Tract 26 a distance of 73.50 e / Donation Land Claim No. 41: / H thence North 01'24'04" East along said East line of the Charles l 4. i . ® azline135 Donation of 950.5 feetSoutherlylofm No. 41 a andparallelswithethe centerlinetofo ago, • St.e Paul andPacific most utherly Railroadrack of the Tracks and thectrue point of , { beginning: thence Westerly along said parallel line on a curve to the left, the center of which bears South 15°22'32" East having a radius of 2790.19 feet, an arc distance of 789.44 feet through a central angle of 16'12'39" to a point of compound curves • thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the left, r- the center of which arcbears distanceth of34375401feetst throughgaa radius central of 2580.74 feet. an ar angle of 09'42'39" to a point of reverse curve; thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the 1 - j right, the center of which bears North 41°17'50" West having a i radius of 428.64 feet, an arc distance of 73.32 feet through a central angle of 09'48'04" to a point of reverse curve: • thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the left. • the center.of which bears South 31 29 46 East having a radius of _ 676.58 feet, an arc distance of 93.64 feet through a central angle of 07°55'47" to a point of tangency: I• thence continuing along said parallel line South 50'34'27" West ' a distance of 248.50 feet to a point of curve; thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the left, the center of which bears South 39°25'33" East having a radius of S al angle 1 off o603°17'45" to the South feet, an arc nline ce fofOthe Burlington.09 feet gNorthern h a rRailroad right-of-way; I thence North 43'49'09" East along said South line a distance of • 'i 173.83 feet to a point of curve: •!1 • 1 - continued - 1 • . I .. -r f,_ •-.:r s—: :as p Lac"r-:---...z�a..e.--o---„r--...5.--._sn .,,, :.1. 'q ls:;;- -_,-*. t_z `cam-�"r=a'e--?^�•' r.S :� �sc, tr .cy,a�r �"';�'qW:,.�a..»,wY`!+•rec �''^ :.13:�,1" F.s',1'.f.11''.,�4': w'yv..r'^-- . ter 7M- - •"tom 1. v /• rVA:4-47..•,::•Kv .S i ',F:is..-1-'-: ', ,j 5Y- �.:'4. ; z-,- s�^Cr-�e.7� `;�ti k;.: .Q•-s...`, - `` ,t: a.t t i„n� = :. ./;.r 1,r.ti 1,••-•F s> y,;:..;,a, .G.,: ,+=: - •''r:.�� '-'�L:.ii','_. _ ..Ct : '5� ad,. ..k•�: .J:�r :'t ..:fry.. - "�,:�:c'Zi:.�.r.: `�Y..; .L '•' + -.'..1c Z:S .•w'•t= ;:•f {t�_ c. .. c: "',.J" r'•`+'F:•'. '�i ' ' -J �X:';,«,.... Y3;•3. a+ .:s". •t:a�' ' '., iF y.,.., �.� "0�._ .:.s•-`:` y:' �� }:.'"-'r,,.^.,^ 1-?,;1l.,ti17., r� .r. `.":.. i' t ,t :„',,•r ,,; _�. •.-yi .y . z ..,..>' ,: Y.:";qi ti' fir, j:s. = i' • f ,= y z; �; .. s� r.. 1 .Y'a, �T▪'c',�i. a; !•,, �3.:i;"'�r� r �,4.2 ..T;yya�..,�J�,° �.-..� 3. � �:,.. :�4)y tr - �tY;;-: �-�- . :;L l r�. ,S ,!,,, m.A '`„`�;a, ��..c,�{. .�` :-.��.."....aq s" 7•'� ;.y{:'ci''� -{.i .-t-• 1,. .,iin,^„t,� y%`'e-•' ,a,`.•.<�_z^: ,�- . y ;d'".",_9r.♦ _ F.:Sx'. • -� -,'-‘.'1 .N. •^�. alp yY}�•r .��_ ,d. .�.FFgi7''<!$: - S^ ..': Zr_,�':-,$;,?, i.1'.,w tsta.W P7.. w,.-,, j,:41'N.h?3,! ..5 '-vy ,'67:- .•. :.:< .t�r J,.^,xy. � �4M�,.:. -�,.';ti�,.. 5�;' �:..b.�-d.;'["� a'-' �t�6. ia�s"'' _ .s � . F•:I. - �`' _�..�;•:: - , •.r .q �' .1d'�toP+ - t cif � a>1•' . �.•.•.. •'..x•-,��H..,%E'�'. "�,.F;Y'�,;. 'C -�^, .. n. ^.�� .1;��+�J-, hC• :d S'_<`c�.-•'•. 'cT_< ,,,.p7•:�! •�.5.... ',�.r-,, .y'•.. <c ?F: ..4 '�:� ''`�'Fw• wz � ',wt~+�,a•'L^..,,{"i{ti �,..r}('-�+j�., .-t�.::�t.�:� _ •r,`•.��,�+�no=. ��- r,i �µ t$:t'•.�;r:+e��-: ,,L� L�: •h.:,8 s'i_P --:- ..• ,,t ) ',`'��,Fi' "'•+,i rtc, 'r°;`- ':t,. . 4 ,✓e.iP,- .* `,` `��r-.3,3`K74: X r k y;«=",'47. •,--•S'?, i ,, t 4,11.y ,,I '�- `!,& •,t,p t 4-e" +r�'xT_ .Y r1 ',r e.Ti ;;t kY� ._-7+'�r." r• ' ;,7 ~ - _a a''•. -t ° --tea ,- '' .t, psi f ?� ,run '�:, ra� trr .s..:. ,.,. ' j P b0 6 Order No. 652499 !I DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1-B (continued): thence continuing along said South line on•a curve to the right, the center of which'bears South 46'10'51" East having a radius • i of 4030.00 feet, an arc distance of 197.57 feet through a central 1 angle of 02'48'32" to a point of compound curve; thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. the center of which bears South 43'22'19" East having a radius :1 of 1853.00 feet. an arc distance of 194.75 feet through a central angle of 06'01'18" to a point of compound curve; � thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. CO the center of which anbarc South distance7of1186,.51ast feetathrough radius cad of 10543.00 feet, central angle of 01'00'49" to a point of compound curve; Cthence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right.' O the center of which bearc rs South distance of 193i93 feet throu2" East ghaaradius central e1 of 1657.00 feet an arc cO angle of 06°42'20" to a point of compound curve; thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. :1 the center of which bears South 29'37'52"East having a radius . - - e of 6738.00 feet, an arc distance of 197.76 feet through a central - angle of 01'40'54" to a point of compound curve:- thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right, thecenter of whichbearsdistance of 194.45 feet through a 256'58" East having a acentral dius off1768.00 a 00 feet, an r angle of 06°18'06" to a point of compound curve; • thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right, the center of which bears South 21'38'52" East having a radius of 8603.00 feet. an arc distance of 204.54 feet through a central - angle of 01 21 44 to a point of compound curve; thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. the center of which bears South 20'17'08" East having a radius of , , 1922.,10 feet. an arc distance of 178.79 feet through a central ' angle of 05'19'46" to a point of compound curve on the East line '' of said Charles Brownell Donation Land Claim No. 41: thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. the center-of which bears South 14'57'22" East having a radius of 2814.93 feet, an arc distance of 659.42 feet through a central angle of 13°25'19" to a point of compound curve; thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the right. the center of which bears South 01'32'03" East having a radius of 1165.09 feet, an arc distance of 1097.05 feet through a central • angle of 53°57'00" to a point of tangency; - -� thence continuing along said South line South 37'35'03" East a distance of 308.70 feet to a point of curve; thence continuing along said South line on a curve to the left. • 1 the center of which bears North 52 24 57 East having a radius 1 of 1005.37 feet, an arc distance of 45.82 feet through arcentral •2 angle of 02'36'41" to a line 35 feet SSoutSouthey of attack of the l .; with the centerline of the existing most Chicago; Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Tracks: . 1 • 1 - continued - • 1 • Tr:1i.-0S+S,rc� - . _ 4.11 ': d'L"'"`v`—t �t �-•. `t; �ta�u..:`ao. RS'`t.7t.s,.`.' fir•.; .r 4c r rL.l`'_ -Z a<- . ...; �n :.ar„ _ ...?•d!b.M v. r "•� � "• 2' �`�+�.a_�:.�v''�.,.N4�p.d.+.awl`,\4 Su e.C.•a- r• .. T :ZCr�� ..�yy 71 -6C�- sue- x.V :.2-:?N t5, .: a. 'b` �. p 7 :$i ' ��:=�y�' ;Cc -t�p"�;'�rw;ii•. -r..y '�' w�'..`<5 �;.ssr, Fa••••r'�u- -.. '�,,;w�•� �•'-°,.; ,.• ..• S a t r 'v~••.' »`f.`a.wn•- — 1V c•' Er��y 4 -4, ,q,.r'w c,4 s;, [ra r tyT •tiv. w•.F .:.�� ..,}�v�< �R�ab-.,01..;:, t.=,`y • ti_ . y .� .-3- t:'.^` '•q,'S=�^ - yam". �..,..-^:: ,), ��:�:w ,,,,,i-►=,l^�`•, • • ;,v `it + -„`l 1�".•r` ," y"e",+ -i.",'R'-.'`.`:'LY-e-' '1'4 �:.yi.�. L.a,�cF ..i. `" OCT 9 �•�• Feed by - -;� .., 1,. .a:� ,01-.. ;� : r� w• �� 5 _�• a� .art 51 r ` TIF , G� y; ;:�S ..•.5:- a _ , T'21-,,--y .t. •'''��j� ors ,d"'..- '-1." .�..,ty1- ..w -vvrc - .,it'� , -z.- al,~ Y•.-.;.i:, ;:fir it \,i: '',4 •4, 3 -��,• �F::r• !c- +'.✓`F, FiY:'y-C' 't ". ''4J~'7L= ,,..4`',•'. .. 'i':, :..-- 7,.4 f AI&•1 i r.,^ 1.^3#:�„' �', •ism � -~.',.>.� :: 4s:� ,a �` -'` .ki,"��.'��... '.. pl.�-;ti,.<1 J {y':-•'-'S.:. -_`•,x•: t•,S�r)ti„!."9.,{y. ., "..4:',.,r.'1...''a-„, C.::::q�Sa_.a.7_'.:',_,:. F.-• 5�i.a e� _ s , -`.:Si _�".z-i.« .'J ew*' _ -' e'x' _.'r^a1 • '-')�.'Ri',:i:d ` •v . t.i 1 J,' _ �'' <'Y--a 'E- ^tll_�` w� ,^:X•''�,P s:,1L,..L'x.A,a.' .y wf �.y `V'. "�. z, :.1d1✓�(,e,a ,{' 1. 1-."' .. •.'.._;;;.: Pti.4... ,.. ins rrC---y x"-b:i ryJ5'a:n,.:..d .'• `I,t..,1• ,8e., .F,f�. "g ..I:'•'n••'rR..h J.... ;�C;` I,��G moo.•� '. �r^v Y:+, ��`L �tr.dy� ,kv ,yJ` - t••.:�' 'Sr � :S,r-�� ,.+tw: C, iv. ..f:. 1••;: .-.t.�.`i� ,SCd•..,C: sry'• iy^ � p;s� ''a";.�=,. .J.' �*`v^.;�'4., -;"�'y?�" ':"'f''`��F: t�.;;r�t�fi� `%��:�'4 :`�..'.�,-,.t �.�'":fiiyd;N �"tia.,+i.^s�d;. f. .�" ;vr:.i'4'k.'.�;�}•C�_ k-r,.�i'�yTYw;,�',wl,t-� n_,'/4•. :. .tr • .' w .tfr A.: y' y,- :x'. 1• . 1ry. ,e a:-- { 'r'�,'C. "t'•i �.:, .;aji ^4 i Fi,t'.`0� � ...','... _ C. •K'w"r'a�+'a••,Yt' "'7+'A' f`�a•YI. � v Wit'h a i! a��!�b< �.:a t• ° yn+"�^: �.Iw^YZ. 9 �. �j �,:,, e s,m„ Y>,°' 1 e>:� '� r . a * r ,s s a: ;4,c',:,,,,e,,,Ige i sy t4. ' :,;m,,i as.`t— ` 4 Ft£m� ' C <G�ct '. R kl•�:.-' s . t + aY .,vr' ..,e+,�..• t`�^ 'f- rr.. :.-94— l,:" 44.-'"' l`; ;i, •-i .c `":3 �-.1A .,5:.. ' �`.:;, 'n'� rt '�' .t:1.,. W .i;Y ',+' .aM . 1.�M��' J-T� .f.�4�s��' r.•L� f�•(� j �m�� YI.,� Y.� ��„�.5��t+ Av� •f _ I'' .q p ,..� �Y•-'4'a'It.t. +Jt e ! 1 J i•"f .v 4 Y y�• p.l , . r _ • a� r• .X0.,SP# �2Pr" "..t' .. '=, ''..S � mie }- N.ViieLy "0 .. . h 7,7'- • +�+m� A J�k ?,..1Ac.fi y -47, '`.'' -'.-'?. 5f.h ,x_*', x...� . ,.T ".24.1`$ •y-.• r-,. K=6,..4£$.V ¢a h.":'�-,.� .-~,• ..0 :.,,,.14. `s.Z` • t- pia - 1 • ,Z • Page 7 I Order No. 652499 • DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1-B (continued): - i ~. \ : . \ . . thence Westerly along said parallel line North 40'11'44" West a distance of 126.24 feet to a point of curve; thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the left. the center of which bears South 49'48'16" West having a radius of 1829.78 feet, an arc distance of 309.67 feet through t ] a central angle of 09'41'48"; :' thence North 49'53'32" West along said parallel line a distance aD of 167.07 feet to a point of curve; thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the // • . tto p left. the center of which bears South 40'06'28" West having a CI radius of 1102.46 feet, an arc distance of 807.11 feet through 8 a central angle of 41'56'46" to a point of compound curve; e--i thence continuing along said parallel line on a curve to the ca left. the center of which bears South 01'50'18" East having a CO radius of 2790.19 feet, an arc distance of -659.24 feet through 4. , t a central angle of 13'32'14" to the true point of beginning; • • f- • y • ; i, 1 . il . . - - continued - I ; y yr. �r , 1G �� _ ��5� ,lk..•',:.: ,c..'V, ...--1:�c AIR. 1- �.;�.;' �:` •'`?y. yr. :o,��: meG �r^x•�}"'+:.,c.L .,,i t_. : y'h, L.ia.aa^..'r '.S :�,.'- dtt• !..._-"'•p • t • ,,,s+4...-.5.- ii, F''�.,"i�:,,.^.,,:.'':, .,r,•:r Z #' � A a �,....,+•.`.str'- .a=--"'� .c.„}„�"t:-,,;r"' :.:.�- : i:Ja� -�`,- ,..<,'^: u;„0,-:. ..--c'`•,c«5.:., 4-f 5 l`Jet:,-. r-.�,r .:,'i _,.,, A" •.> r•,:..;sir ,y:3^ - r-,t*s • OCT 9 . �F ..= �. ,�� ,7 ,�w '.:'�,:� r.,..� ...,vow = ...i. 'mat t.: a�: iv A�rari; ` * '•tt: i , • y`�r4�o...rm:$j.g•„-.- : '.l."ffi.,.i,,-'.;x•'� ._,:L ;:' sz' , : ' � a. n _ ':-:_'a -4.'"'""' �:` tYti� fx'_ . , .�i1-'� ge• ..4"°"." ' �:/6am. .y .v `.s e'8 - � , , ci ..v - ' { '�• • 7l .i a . x_a.¢� ,f' i i,:% ° t--'?'� ;-',0�-'bC- t. ;� y��'_ ."- -r : !^Y"`'! : �Jw ,' � t.�' ,6 ' . - -; - .r.x .r , ':, <2 `.. `aStr•; _: r -;:° 2 =r,1.. .�•ief•-.C.� :-,..,_,:;-7 :7sS� w� ifk`U'- . `. :i, ,..�;�� r:- iA..^.t ..:-_` . ?t-'^• -r {. ..r �Sx �'1-t1 �,i" ' y :. ,';°' tq 'e':'�� , _r„,+r �-Y`te.a �'< •�- ..S�.b . r _ .s-r . yw":; '.rza;. ..t,��§r;, �7 'r,23x,;u.r^-C.-:f -' L�Y'-' .'. ' �3a� f^_ ) ;�';r.;y f'''L'•- - 'y:7y^ � f,a'.�sa,* ,. _tr � r �� ,�'t -'_" ; ;,� +�.�:,Sa-? 7.."r=z�Y:3�� a:s?-� ;,..,13 i:.r;"..-•l,. i",.4%>i:.N^a,; : u.''..^k-�+.v5iy :..ny.:„=Y�:>> • '��' 5' , , �r=>:, '�aX:�'`-'`t"�-. x. �9 rc: ? �:�. ,�i;w � �; e �,y.� . � ��' f:y � `,::�. %tix �Yr:i� _.�ar>i;:,>. � ,�''��•� 0.� �TMS `^ r..� .\'•�+� . r r '"wf,e.�t^•- z,- � t',•.-�- �i � °? ` . '�:;�y '-��"ne- , S`•`.F .;a ::f..• �,tiv. ��:,70.<-�x, -y. . ' ' T", N�3 '^F aSy" aa�.�.+ t Ar . ! •.Yy �r . .. ,-4 .. 4t �4 .,14..d'Y�-a� �� 7,, c^�r.,' { ;.vg )'nv # � y.:)r',,,N4�f�-'�N- t ff.✓ ..rW �-s� /al..y -.1r ^` : •(C ,., �"j .f4,;^ .v...,..!X3y.qy:.y.,, ' dr . f" ." EJ . . S . � 1• - i ' -` 1w Page 8 ?1 Order No. 652499 • DESCRIPTION (continued): .-. ' ' i F.- 1 PARCEL 1-C: \ . - :. . I That portion of Tract 25, Renton Shorelands 2nd Supplemental; AND That portion of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township:23 L North, Range 4 East W.M. , and the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13, 1 and the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 I East W.M. , described as follows:CO . • ' :Co Beginning at the South 1/4 • corner of said Section 13; thence North 00°58'28" East along the North - South centerline p ri of said Section 13. a distance of 884.84 feet to the Southeast // . - corner of Tract 26 of Renton Shorelands Second Supplemental CD QD Maps, according to the unrecorded plat thereof, and the true point of beginning; thence South 72'37'52" West along the South boundary of said - Tract 26. a distance of 382.60' feet; , ] - thence North 70°54'02" West along the South boundary of said - ,j Tract 26, a distance of 73.51 feet to the East line of the Charles '1 Brownell Donation Land Claim No. 41: thence North 01'24'04" East along said East line, a distance of 950.58 feet to a line 35 feet Southerly of and parallel with the centerline of the existing most Southerly track of the Chicago. Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Tracks; thence along said line 35 feet Southerly of and parallel with • the centerline of the most Southerly track, along a curve to • the right, the center of which bears South 15'22 32" East, having a radius of 2,790.19 feet, an arc distance of 659.24 feet through 1 • a central angle of 13'32'14" to a point of compound curve; • - :, thence along a curve to the right. along said parallel line. the center of which bears South 01 50'18" East having a radius of 1,102.46 feet, an arc distance 807.11 feet through a central • 1 angle of 41°56'46"; I thence South 49'53'32" East. along said parallel line, a distance of 167.07 feet; thence along a curve to the right. along said parallel line, having a radius of 1,829.78 feet, an arc distance of 309.67 feet • - through a central angle of 09'41'48"; ' ofe126.24aving feet togd a pparallel on theline. SouthSouth line•of'44" East, a distance the Burlington i, Northern Railroad right-of-way: thence along a curve to the left, along said South line, the center - of which bears North 49'48'16" East having a radius of 1,005.37 feet. _ ; an arc distance of 549.02 feet through a central angle of 31'17'19" 1 to a point tangent on said South line of the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way; '4 thence continuing along said South line, South 71'29'03" East along a line 50 feet South of and parallel with the existing Southbound tract. a distance of 826.56 feet to the West line of said Section 16; - continued - ,,.: • ,, s +.c i„u"_ ,,.' . .. ,,,,, •ir,, ._z.,0,, �_:,..... ...cs' '+ " Via'` .. ti:• c .,.:.:... j Tr. a .. ,„st ;-:-, ' ...v T . ►. > S� y� ice, -,.•u lz: `e r. '',,,,--- "i°s'+"'r e"^_ - r" >�.`.-`U,. :.vicZw• a, t•,�, :°'tri> ,., . ST,�y - ,ra w+.:.L r, ', k.l)Gf>� >.. c -�±''a''' a-yam -t+• =!:- i".,I r S„'•a.,•'`{y q._4 - -� 'i°; �t'V-rK-'-�t'Y.=�'�J; ,lr'.h�Y.O e;;=,.�� „y� F-�ii"-s 1��'�+� ;.,q.a,. A.f?%;..4 Ja �t'':ti"�:4,. s. j — n. - '.i•? i� C✓,�'��$, -�F'':y�}'- i.7.. _ 3 '.fo' G4:ik^F;r....' �p.`'�� ;.�.-r x-•..,�.^• •� i.. .fy': S,.• y.i,qi{f ... '..0. '�� _ �4'::': �Y.. �F .1Q .�.e .i •!'a-` �`Q.•.;,_ " ?sue: 7; 3 � ' (=: 4. • '.,,•;X ('..•�g;:.ra_2 � '.x ;ti•$py�::.. - - +M�` ?�:� "x-'...`lit• ,P` .+G, �r a ' • • ?`: �.� , :Y' is od` ; :';.r:`d.„Yd{a• t-•tyr'r;::: ,<•=w: ••-•r...• l' .4";;-) i '•- ••:.y.,,#•" ..1- .AI_y yZ-. • ;i'.:H_▪ •�;"-•ct"��Z:,"";rr .s��,,3,�.:• qq s^a T+: R�,:�^':!+: '.�4.<.��:.F. a'�.C•'.+�' f'- •, " 1;. ."'v"='i'a..."�, =S.x..;`+,r+f, �`'rd%Tc^s_'..9'-=_q}^.t- ;.;?:2u..w4:' -F n- .•.�,,,i'ti,.-:f:,. -',II:3hr!...Z•.; _ *w'"N�- _ '''''� ar.'f:' i?L. C.•e,L rid i:.•'a..::,;L'a yam, -.•c". -..n ,.FA- _ "f445 -, i - J . ;^' P, v}'.. �'�.-sue .::"1'�'k+ '�� Ab'1 .v� ..-•. .'ra `�g„ tJr"p,',$ �:� n. _„• 'ia,:..ti _;y„ .•)' f.�:tiP+7.'''•:y L'F=Ba- `',, .:..t .i•5•:•. �4•' °�': ..,.,,`-{ .L-:� `s'=[..;,,.y i �AF•s,...,• �C:ir-, -,�.`. ,>��w .)a..•,- � ;''�i � �.,-.•.a.;d.'s ..'4. ....•H°°...e.„, ..',;':3. ...„, .`'. .n•a:K• .� ...� :,.`,.r •'".1.•.. ...,,,. ,,,,,„/'..r-,,••.l'._�•v.,- ;. i.,.t •� i'2iYr.•`,d ._ L•a • _T,r,4<q{'::sS',�,s• ��, .y,s t;;:_4:; fi,Y_c. ;`k„a3 �'„*'a;,�.u•t,".�,..,: �hr't,_. �' ,a'•,L^ 'r^ I ,yv,cs, `•:se',- 7. .,,e, ."- �..4#y: ;r .h u;_;7',t 'i'#$r't'�G•'•'':`sr.t 's.,..;:A:>'^ s,�0i.; ,' .."1"4. ,: .y..f:,>.'' , .rfY;*:�'} �' r� �; a ,. �y `a'.;St�• 1,.. � rs�,;r:M�,.§j•=, ft.:.�.,�»' ��. A�• : rx.s :+ P ..c,'x..y F"5s d Y'. '' ??"+7x1k� .' A. t-: ,- >w�. �:: r' . : .1..'aat. L% '.. ,w J:'- '"d.'^x•�i •►3�-'� '�.�"', ''+ N44.?aN44.?a,1 ' .4 . p�'y''. .'."r-^4v. `� �•-,0. �..5. A(�x `S�`,rii } p?��•-'s•'�' •'rJ dh�gs"i,r('3s am▪ •,s- h, . S•"..Z.t��.'4`�,S.i •yam `� +.r"';q ,.q„-.' t yqy.3 ,' \Y ,ye.,: -,-.., 5 t •"•w i' .- y ,a ;` ,d 4rt � .�+y'y ,�!�. .-G 9.a, �^ t.•.:....nYiRT�- �. ..+;:.t'•'.�.'a„•��. r! -�+w.''��.•"'*,"��...'..«�- - _.f t�'" .w. . . ^A#IeS: .d •�•�, • +_• • Page 9 • Order No. 652499 l' DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1-C (continued): it . �� thence continuing along said South line South 71'29'03" East, a distance of 85.52 feet to the North line of the South 650 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 18; thence North 89'10'25" West along the North line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 18. a distance of _ . .. _ :t. 81.57 feet to the East line of the Southeast 1/4 of said ir- �,; Section 13; / - thence North 88'15'00" West along the North line of the Southy650 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 13. distance of2.261.41 feet to an angle ppoint on the South boundary of Tract 25 /.- +• 0 of Renton Shore Lands, 1958; p thence North 33'07'25" West along said South boundary, a distance + of 154.51 feet to an angle point; CD OD f thence North 27'21'32" East along said South boundary. a distance of 387.32 feet to an angle point; . - • . thence North 83'17'25" West along said South boundary. a distance - of 171.17 feet; I thence South 46'22'22" West along said South boundary, a distance . •l of 324.66 feet; thence South.72'37'52" West along said South boundary, a distance • of 76.33 feet to the true point of beginning; Situate in the City of Renton.-,County of Ring. State of Washington. • i 1 • II - - \ - • }i • i . # •f ., . a - • - continued - . • ei 5•"M'it- ; n f .. >� c' 3" ' r-y;_ : , za .r. ,.ti ,•r ,U••-•..''„.a �•.t K t prrti r3r▪ R ant k r`'.ry 2°dr .i _ � OCT 9 .a.1� -_r. Fli t-a�,�.,.L.v' a� a'v` �i�e`c..� .t v'�t`�::}'."}'.:.°"`�at.�e ▪ <'`g ra........�a... ..,.ssr '�'Sie.? `�` '1,a :a'., P + ..,fi`'d' -c!'. y L e:s'.., ae �' - su ` DRDER NO. 6580 1pa''" cm POE `ESCROW NO. LOAN NO. . MORTGAGOR 1 PLAT MAP Vol PG___ y2CT. i.?- Tii'it/23//- ar 4 G. iY.J1 F T/ON' .TUNC Al.? % Chi Dr 5L 177GF /47- /2-16175 '4',2tE5 /(/ 'tL PL.C. '` CA . ' .1 ,EN7DV 9,0Z L'i4YD5 2° SU/ . \. ,,,� \ �' e'er \ �16 \ / ‘' \ \ c, s_ ..,- t., cr VPCW A ems. .cp- ,�Piaa e:N ial 14 e. z -ems. d at • C3` /"It) q . 4 This map does not purport to show all highways , roads or easements affecting. . nii Na W P 353r---siitaz Form No.BOR) ;RDER NO. 65e4�7,4gE c. .. ESCROW NO. LOAN NO. - MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PGhi B __+_ R.P. W io97o5. 659.42�' pAnc(C. I f-B I�8 I 8ozii' G la 659.29 9� v° �8 L. l:a 1I; \ 18 �g1 a 11 a 1b ICI, -A ,�.A '' 1 h o yA le gay% ` ilvi +l� R ..1 It': I ''� C CN e. IS /e #7x,,\ A a • . 0 ,- ............_ '3:so, 1\ 1 v 126 kriiIIN AO - . 510RApPf 5ti" PR L\ ,o map does not purport to show all highways , roads or easements affecting` .-;•N..w,_Akt65s - )RDER NO. 65e4' tr.i,..i^ti No.DOR) I ", ::SCROW NO. 3 LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR ' PLAT MAP Vol PG 3oB lj /6) 9lj£' \ Q. 0j, Y� y N ti k N y1 V -Pv V"10- 2 A i A/ °/S'Q?'/v 22a 4 ' I I • 'his map does not purport to show all highways , roads or easements affecting -,a SR —05—) -S�, V _C` g— L, [ k �� a s 0r .S I.., 1 Vp Fr, 1 , BU"' ' ROED & HITCHINGS. INC. g\1 ‘ ,1 ,v, 6 EXHIBIT 2 NACHES AVENUE SOUTHWEST (TOTAL 60 ' RIGHT-OF-WAY IN BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK) : THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN 30.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 13 WHICH IS NORTH 88°15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1626.50 FEET FROM THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 1 °45'00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°19'12" WEST 329.69 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 724.11 FEET TO A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 55.00 FEET SOUTHERLY, WHEN MEASURED RADIALLY FROM THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 2082.08 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°10'35" WEST 301.71 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS 54.10 FEET WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTH 43 °49'09" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 254.90 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 250.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 143.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE E NORTH BOUNDARY OF A TRACT OF LAND DEEDED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 6607786, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND THE END OF SAID CENTERLINE DESCRIPTION. FIRST CITY EQUITIES BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK NOVEMBER 17, 1986 BRH NO. 86114.01 SURVEY DISK 12 lfriv?, L.HIr:;;"- Q r f- \c 0 f' 3335 L O ?i,e r•c,. ? T ER AZ , 4944/ l AND ,,\ _ _ - A . O THE CITY OF RENTON _ MUNICIPAL BUILDING_ 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 Z ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER �'O FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 o O94TD SEPSE�O�P August 28, 1986 Barbara E. Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 I Seattle, Wa. 98104 I RE: First City Equities'', File No. SA-057-86 and V-058-86 Dear Ms. Moss: The Examiner's Report regarding the referenced application which was published August 13, 1986 has not been appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore, this matter is considered final and is being transmitted to the City Clerk this date for filing. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING Examiner FJK:dk cc: City Clerk Building & Zoning Department • ov THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o k °' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER .5)° co. FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 o9�TFC P SEPTE August 22, 1986 Barbara E. Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, WA 98104 Re: File No. SA-057-86 and V-058-86; Clarification Request Dear Ms Moss: I have reviewed your letter of August 15, 1986 concerning the denial of the variance for cul-de-sac extension and my response follows. I am also in receipt of a Memorandum from Zoning Administrator Roger Blaylock regarding similar matters. This response will also serve as a response to Mr. Blaylock's memo. I don't believe the decision requires modification in light of the current status of the subject site, an undivided parcel. You may extend within your boundaries any form of driveway, although since dedication is ultimately expected, the drive should probably correspond with City standards for public roads. If a slight extension of Naches Avenue is necessary beyond 500 feet, the staff report was unclear in this regard, this letter shall authorize such extension and shall be read to approve a variance of sufficient length to reach your property's southern property line. While the original report denied the variance sufficient justification was cited in the report to grant a minimum variance to reach the subject site with an extension of Naches Avenue. On the;separate matter of the width of such roadway, responded to outside of the public hearing process by the Public Works Director (See enclosure) - I believe the decision contained sufficient latitude to incorporate Mr. Houghton's comments. If this office can be of further assistance please feel free to call. Sincerely, FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER t- REcEIV _ • AUG 18 1986 FIRST CITY �T� etc RE, ON EQUITIES � August 15, 1986 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98005 • RE: File #SA-057-86 and #V-058-86 ADMAC-Blackriver Corporate Park Dear Mr. Kaufman: I am in receipt of your Report and Decision dated August 13, 1986, in which you approved the ADMAC site plan on the Blackriver' property but denied our request for a variance to extend Naches Avenue beyond 500 feet. In reviewing your report, it is our understanding that we are permitted to build Naches Avenue to extend from the property line and to run north to- serve the ADMAC site, as long as the road does not exceed 500 feet in length from that property line. Please confirm your approval of this interpretation with a letter by August 22, 1986 in order to allow me time to review it prior to the final acceptance of your report. Warm Regards, FIRST CITY EQUITIES Barbara E. Moss Director-,of Planning BEM/rm • cc: Royce Berg Bob Roed . David Schuman 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170•Seattle,Washington 98104•(206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments.. .-. . , , i: . OF R�� o$ z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR .t • 0,9 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 tr 42, o91 TEC SEP-Cot BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR RECEIVED AUG 191986 DATE: August 14, 1986 CITY OF RENTON TO: • Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER FROM: oger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: CLARIFICATION OF DECISION FILE V-058-86/FIRST CITY EQUITIES The Building and Zoning Department would like to request a clarification of•the Hearing Examiner's decision concerning the specific length of the cul-de-sac for Naches Avenue. Naches Avenue when constructed will extend approximately 500 feet from South Seventh Street to the southern edge of the subject site. To provide street frontage and allow the parking lot adequate circulation access as proposed in the site plan, Naches Avenue should be extended another 500 feet to the northern edge of the proposed AdMac Development. The applicant had proposed extending Naches Avenue an additional 300 feet to the north which does appear to allow potential for future development beyond the present site plan • request. This does appear to be in conflict with the intent of the criteria to approve the minimum variance necessary. It would seem that the variance would have to be granted to allow the frontage along the western edge of the AdMac Site to be developed. Based upon the decision of the Examiner to deny the variance in total, the Building and Zoning Department could not allow the extension of any of Neches Avenue onto the subject site because Naches Avenue is already at the maximum 500 foot length. Building and Zoning Department would appreciate clarification to determine if it was the intent of the Examiner to allow the cul-de-sac to extend the 500 feet to the northern edge of the subject or to terminate at the southern property line. RJB:ss 3061Z �• F r OF R.4, � II �� ° PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ® RICHARD C. HOUGHTON 0 DIRECTOR NAL 0sm. �' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 0 P 206 235-2569 .17.ED sEPISI°' BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR ECEIVED MEMORANDUM AUG 191986 CITY OF RENTON TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER FROM: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: SA-057-86 ADMAC Building First City Equities • From discussions with the applicant after the public hearing, it appears that there was some disagreement as to the classification of the roadway through the property. In discussions with the applicant engineer prior to the hearino and as part of the overall transportation plan for the area, it was decided to designate that portion of Natches Ave. S.W. through this property as an industrial access roadway with 36 feet of pavement from curb to curb in a 60 foot right-of-way. The Public Works staff do not see any reason to classify this section of road- way as an industrial collector. I hope this assists you in your decision Dick Houghton DGM:ckd r RECEIVED - At9 G 181986 FIRST CITY oG DAMN a®" EQUITIES HEAR August 15, 1986 Mr. Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98005 RE: File #SA-057-86 and #V-058-86 ADMAC-Blackriver Corporate Park Dear Mr. Kaufman: I am in receipt of your Report and Decision dated August 13, 1986, in which you approved the ADMAC site plan on the Blackriver property but denied our request for a variance to extend Naches Avenue beyond 500 feet. In reviewing your report, it is our understanding that we are permitted to build Naches Avenue to extend from the property line and to run north to serve the ADMAC site, as long as the road does not exceed 500 feet in length from that property line. Please confirm your approval of this interpretation with a letter by August 22, 1986 in order to allow me time to review it prior to the final acceptance of your report. Warm Regards, FIRST CITY EQUITIES Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM/rm cc: Royce Berg Bob Roed David Schuman 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170 Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments 1 OF R�� A.4 t0$ ® z BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 09 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH.98055 • 235-2540 0,9gr�D SEP-Vve BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR RECEIVED AUG 191986 DATE: August 14, 1986 CITY OF RENTON TO: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER FROM: oger J. Blaylock, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: CLARIFICATION OF DECISION FILE V-058-86/FIRST CITY EQUITIES The Building and Zoning Department would like to request a clarification of the Hearing Examiner's decision concerning the specific length of the cul-de-sac for Naches Avenue. Naches Avenue when constructed will extend approximately 500 feet from South Seventh Street to the southern edge of the subject site_ To provide street frontage and allow the parking lot adequate circulation access as proposed in the site plan, Naches Avenue should be extended another 500 feet to the northern edge of the proposed AdMac Development. The applicant had proposed extending Naches Avenue an additional 300 feet to the north which does appear to allow potential for future development beyond the present site plan request. This does appear to be in conflict with the intent of the criteria to approve the minimum variance necessary. It would seem that the variance would have to be granted to allow the frontage along the western edge of the AdMac Site to be developed. Based upon the decision of the Examiner to deny the variance in total, the Building and Zoning Department could not allow the extension of any of Naches Avenue onto the subject site because Naches Avenue is already at the maximum 500 foot length. Building and Zoning Department would appreciate clarification to determine if it was the intent of the Examiner to allow the cul-de-sac to extend the 500 feet to the northern edge of the subject or to terminate at the southern property line. RJB:ss 3061Z OF R44. �� 400 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RICHARD C. HOUGHTON • DIRECTOR 0 NAL �°' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 9A 206 235-2569 0D-et) e SEPTEP BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR RECEIVED MEMORANDUM AUG 191986 CITY OF RENTON TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner HEARING EXAMINER FROM: Richard Houghton, Public Works Director SUBJECT: SA-057-86 ADMAC Building First City Equities From discussions with the applicant after the public hearing, it appears that there was some disagreement as to the classification of the roadway through the property. In discussions with the applicant engineer prior to the hearing and as part of the overall transportation plan for the area, it was decided to designate that portion of Natches Ave. S.W. through this property as an industrial access roadway with 36 feet of pavement from curb to curb in a 60 foot right-of-way. The Public Works staff do not see any reason to classify this section of road- way as an industrial collector. I hope this assists you in your decision Dick Houghton . DGM:ckd • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County, of King ) DOTTY KLINGMAN D being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and states: That on. the 13th day of August , 1986 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. SUBSCRIBED//S� AND SWORN to before me this /.3,�C day of • LGGL , 1986.. 631h Notary Pub and for the State of Washington, residing at , therein. . Application, Petition, or Case #: FIRST CITY EQUITIES - SA-057-86 & V-058-86 (The minutes contain a list of the parties of record.) August 13, 1986 OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION. APPLICANT: , FIRST CITY EQUITIES FILE NO. : SA-057-86 and V- 058-86 LOCATION: Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W at the 500 block. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Site Plan approval to allow the construction of a two- ' story building having 93 ,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses and a Variance to allow a cul-de- sac road length over 500 feet. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Building and Zoning Department Recommendation: Approval with conditions. Hearing Examiner Decision: Site Plan approved with conditions; Variance is denied. BUILDING & ZONING The Building & Zoning DEPARTMENT REPORT: Department Report was received by the Examiner on July 30, 1986. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Building and Zoning Department Report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on August 5, 1986, at 9: 05 A.M. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13 , 1986 Page 2 The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit #1 - Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit #2 - Site Plan Exhibit #3 - Landscape Plan Exhibit #4 - Illustrative Master Plan of the entire site. Exhibit #5 - Transportation Plan between applicant and Metro. Exhibit #6 - Letter from Barbara Moss to Ron Olson dated July 18, 1986. Exhibit #7 - Letter from Roger Blaylock to Royce Berg dated August 1, 1986. The Zoning Administrator, Roger Blaylock opened the hearing by entering Exhibits 1 - 4 and continued setting out background information on the applicant's request and comments from staff. He stated the application is for site plan approval of a phased development; the building will be utilized as an office and manufacturing/warehouse facility for the world headquarters of Admac Company; the applicant is leasing the ground to the corporation but will retain ownership control over the property and development at this time; a cul-de-sac is requested greater than 500 ft. in length, with the applicant proposing to construct 500 additional feet in length to be added on to an existing street, Naches Avenue. The specific site is 4. 3 acres; the variance is requested due to the size and shape of the site; the applicant is aware they will have to construct a 2300 sq. ft. long street through the site to allow full development of the Black River Industrial Park and feels this can be staged and still meet the emergency access requirements necessary. Continuing, Mr. Blaylock reviewed the criteria to be considered when approving a variance and stated the applicant has special circumstances to be considered on this site due to the size (approximately 90 acres) , shape (long and narrow) and the location of the property. He said the western portion of the site is to be dedicated to the City to try and preserve the natural elements of the site; Naches Avenue will serve the entire site with a second access off Powell Avenue. The applicant has been discussing the infrastructure of the road system with staff, and it was pointed out that the Fire Department is requesting that an emergency r/ ' First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 3 roadway be constructed prior to framing of the buildings. It was suggested that the applicant dedicate to the City a reservation for the industrial collector street. In closing remarks regarding the Variance, the Zoning Administrator recommended approval. Reviewing the Site Plan request, it was noted that an attempt is being made to'itake the natural amenities in the forebay that surrounds the P-1 Channel and enhance them to create a focus for the office park. Mr. Blaylock stated the drainage system will be enhanced by the addition of bridges, jogging trails and landscaping, with the western portion of the site being left in its natural state. The Zoning Administrator advised a significant stand of trees has been designated as preserved on the site; and a review of staff comments was presented. It was recommended that the applicant participate in future traffic improvements within the complete site; should construct Naches Ave. S.W. and the emergency access road from Powell Ave. S.W. prior to framing of the building, and provide a legal document that will permanently\ reserve the right-of-way for construction of Naches Ave. S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to Oakesdale Avenue S.W. for an industrial collector arterial. With these closing comments, Mr. Blaylock recommended the Examiner approve the proposal as submitted. Testifying in favor of the project for the applicant was: Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Wa. 98104 Ms. Moss advised the Examiner there would be no fence around the site; access off Naches will be a controlled access through the use of boardwalks and jogging trails to create a park-like setting, and presented Exhibit #5 setting out transportation goals and achievements between the applicant and Metro. Ms. Moss discussed the recommendations by staff and stated they would prefer not to have restrictive covenants for traffic improvements placed on the site but will sign a letter of intent to do the improvements when they are warranted; would like to leave the reservation area open where Naches will connect to Oakesdale so they can determine from the Public Works Department as to its exact location, noting Monster Road is always available as access for their hauling operation; and discussions have been held with Public Works and they were instructed,and have planned for a 60 ft. right-of-way for industrial access. Ms. Moss referred to the cul-de-sac stating it is temporary. She stated the previous owners had a special permit to build a permanent cul-de-sac but when the applicant purchased the property they decided to extend the roadway all the way through; the applicant has requested infrastructure approval on the entire road as they are currently working on it now, as well as the other off-site amenities that will be located throughout the site so they can obtain a complete design approval from the City possibly be free to build on a phase-by-phase basis on-site. In %' . First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 4 closing, Ms. Moss reviewed the landscaping on the site; requested HDK share in the cost of the curbs, gutters and sidewalks as their, property abuts this site by approximately 50%; and introduced the architect for this project. Testifying further in support of this proposal was: Royce Berg, Architect LPN Architects 114 Vine Street Seattle, Washington, 98121 Mr. Berg addressed parking for the site stating there are 158 parking stalls projected which is less than the 200 that are permitted. The applicant doesn't feel they need the additional parking for the use of the facility and will instead use additional landscaping and call the landscaping a parking reserve. Referring to the fire access he stated it will come off Powell Avenue, go to Naches, and would like to make an access-easement for emergency access to the south of the building. They would like to reach an agreement as to the type of surface to be used which could possibly contain some grass, which would blend into the landscaping. The fire department has indicated a preference for a hard surface. The emergency access would run completely through the property via an east-west road, with possibly more than a 20 ft. width, above and beyond the landscape buffer to the south of that roadway which is not required by the City. Mr. Berg also stated they would like latitude with the Fire Department as to the phasing of the development with regard to paving of the access points proposed. He had no further comments at this time. The Examiner called for further testimony in support of the application. There was no one wishing to speak. There was no testimony in opposition, and no further comments were offered by staff. The hearing closed at 10: 30 A.M. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant, First City Equities, filed a request for approval of a Site Plan for a two story building containing approximately 93, 170 square feet of interior space, together with a request for a Variance to allow a cul-de-sac road greater than 500 feet in length. 2. The yellow file containing the staff report, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation and other pertinent materials was' entered into the record as Exhibit #1. First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 5 3 . The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) , the City's responsible official issued a declaration of non-significance (DNS) for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block, in what is the extreme southeast corner of the Black River Office Park property. 6. The subject site was annexed into the City with the adoption of Ordinance 1745 enacted in April, 1959, as amended by Ordinances 1756 and 1928 adopted in May, 1959 and December, 1961, respectively. The subject site was rezoned from its initial G (General) zoning to M-P (Manufacturing Park) zoning with the adoption of Ordinance 3694 adopted in December, 1982 . A preliminary plat and special permit for fill and grade had been approved for the site but expired by law. A new special permit was approved in May, 1986 which permits filling the subject site. 7. The map element of the Comprehensive Plan designates the area in which the subject site is located as suitable for the development of Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option uses, but does not mandate such development without consideration of other policies of the plan. 8. The subject site is undeveloped. It is in the extreme southeast corner of the crescent shaped parcel and is only a small approximately 4. 3 acre, portion of a parcel approximately 89 acres in size. The property has not been divided by a formal plat. Improvements such as roads and utility lines have not been extended through the site. 9. The parcel has frontage along Powell Avenue S.W. which is east of the site via what was a temporary turn-around/cul-de-sac constructed by Washington Technical Park. The site will have frontage along proposed Naches Avenue S.W. , immediately west of the site, as a result of an ERC mitigation measure. 10. The area south of the site is being developed by both HDK and the current applicant, First City Equities. North of the site is a railroad right-of-way and the undeveloped western portion of the CHG Sun Point complex. 11. The applicant proposes constructing a two story painted concrete and reflective tinted glass walled building on the southern two-thirds of the site. The northern third would be reserved for the expansion of the current tenant, ADMAC. The current tenant proposes establishing its corporate offices at the site along with manufacturing and warehousing operations. First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 6 12 . A drainage channel runs along the south edge of the subject site. The channel provides a regulated flow of water to stands of trees preserved as a condition of the rezone. The site plan shows this feature to have been significantly enhanced by the applicant. The 'ditch' will be widened and combined with landscaping to form an eighty (80) foot wide landscape corridor along the south edge of the subject site. The applicant proposes (although not legally committed at this time) to incorporate this type of landscape theme into the remainder of the development. The landscaping and channel would also be coordinated with the area preserved along the north side of the Black River Channel just west of the site. 13 . The grading plan and proposed site plan attempt to save significant natural vegetation and land forms including the aforementioned stands of trees, and the natural swales on the site. 14. Additional landscaping along the south side of the building will be initially provided in an area reserved for future parking as provided under Section 4-2208 (12) . The applicant believes that the minimum standard required parking is excessive for the subject proposal and would instead develop the area with landscape materials. If parking proved insufficient, the landscaping would be replaced with the requisite parking stalls. 15. The south building facade will exceed the minimum length for Fire Department access, therefore, the applicant proposes providing an access along the south wall. The applicant proposes installing, with Fire Department approval, an acceptable driving surface but would prefer a material which could support some form of lawn growth as an alternative to asphalt. 16. The building will be 'L' shaped - approximately 400 feet long and between 150 and 220 feet deep. Parking, with the exception of those stalls initially (possibly permanently) given over to landscaping, will be provided north and west of the building. Landscaping will mainly buffer the perimeter of the parking areas, with small planters provided in the parking areas. 17. The applicant proposes extension of Naches Avenue through the site. It would enter the site in a north/south alignment and as it approached the north property line, it would more or less parallel the north property line until it intersected the proposed Oakesdale Avenue at the west end of the property. The plan now proposed would extend Naches approximately 800 feet into the whole parcel, or approximately 400 feet north of the northern extent of the subject proposal. The applicant would provide a temporary cul-de-sac at the road's end. • First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 7 18. A cul-de-sac may not exceed 500 feet in length, therefore, the applicant has requested a variance to permit the proposed 800 foot long cul-de-sac. The applicant cites the uncertainly of the ultimate Oakesdale alignment and intersection design as reasons for not completing the Naches alignment and installation with the construction of the subject proposal. 19 . The applicant agreed to modify those aspects of its design which would have interfered with emergency access. 20. The applicant has also entered in to a transportation management plan (TMP)with Metro. In general terms the TMP would require the current applicant to work with lessees and other occupants of the complex and educate, facilitate and survey employees with the stated aim of discouraging single occupancy vehicle trips and encouraging car and van pooling, and use of mass transit. The applicant would provide a transit coordinator, on-site information displays, and have tenants provide business specific coordinators. CONCLUSIONS Site Plan 1. The proposed site plan appears to serve the public use and interest. Not only does the plan preserve trees as required by conditions previously imposed upon development of the subject site, but the applicant has enhanced an otherwise ordinary open drainage ditch to provide an additional on-site focal point. Obviously the proposed 80 foot buffer on the east side of the major access roadway, Naches Avenue, will serve as the gateway for the entire project. It will represent the applicant's concept for the complex, a well designed abundantly landscaped complex and project the main image for the remainder of the complex. 2 . While serving the applicant's aim, it will secondarily, but no less importantly, provide a well designed complement to the City's image. It will also complement the area, a growing area of office, manufacturing park and warehouse uses. This complex itself will reveal a park-like atmosphere called for in the Comprehensive Plan, and one which it can only be hoped, will be replayed on the remainder of the subject site. Illustrative plans would appear to indicate such potential for the remaining acreage. 3 . The applicant appears to be attempting to counter the prevailing trend - the conversion of large amounts of acreage to asphalt either for parking, emergency access or simply to minimize maintenance responsibility. Not only will areas reserved for parking be initially landscaped but the applicant intends to provide emergency access over surfaces other than asphalt. While such surfaces appear untested or discouraged, they should be approved unless there is an overriding and First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 8 compelling reason to reject them. Any method which encourages landscaping and discourages asphalt is to be preferred. 4. Access to the site presents no problems for the initial development. (The requested variance is discussed below. ) The current proposal will be served by both the extension of Naches on the west and Powell on the east. While staff was unsure of what size right-of-way would be required to serve the site, the applicant indicated that a reserve strip in a general alignment running north/south just west of the current proposal and then generally west to the west end of the entire property would be set aside. This reserve strip should be set aside at a width of not, less than 80 feet, the required width of a industrial collector. Then, depending upon the ultimate determination by the Department of Public Works, a lessor reserve could be set aside, if 80 feet is excessive. Variance 5. While the. location of the site and the uncertainly of the final design for both the alignment of Oakesdale and the intersection of Naches and Oakesdale could provide justification for a variance, the length of the proposed road is more than the minimum necessary for relief. The cul-de-sac need not be longer than the permitted 500 feet. 6. Again, while the site is nestled against a railroad line and is topographically removed from traditional access corridors thereby creating an undue hardship, the variance appears totally unnecessary for the current proposal. Even though access to the site from more than one location is necessary for emergency circulation it can be provided without the variance. Therefore, the provision of even the temporary cul- de-sac beyond the 500 feet would appear unjustified. 7. Approval would not create any unwarranted precedent since the site is quite unique both in location and in the City's inability at this time to provide an alignment for Oakesdale. Approval would also not harm either the public or neighboring properties. The road, due to the site's. location, will not affect other property. 8 . The length of the road, which extends beyond the boundaries of the current proposal is excessive. In order for a variance to be approved it must satisfy all criteria. One of those criteria is the requirement that the variance relief be the minimum necessary to allow reasonable development. As the plans demonstrate the current project, the only one now being reviewed, can proceed without any variance. To provide both primary access and emergency access to the site, a cul-de-sac longer than 500 feet is unnecessary. The variance is, therefore, and is denied. First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 9 9. ,The requested variance is unnecessary for the subject proposal. It clearly goes beyond the needs of the current site plan. Even if intended to serve a potential expansion, it remains unnecessary. Other issues such as required secondary access to interior parcels should be analyzed before any variance is approved. A complete plan for the site, either a plat dividing the property in the traditional manner or a binding site plan should be presented before a variance is approved. It is, therefore, premature to consider a variance for a cul-de-sac greater than 500 feet in length. DECISION The Site Plan is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The execution of Restrictive Covenants providing an 80 foot wide reserve strip generally running the length of the entire 89 acre parcel, approximately 2, 300 feet in length, and commencing in the vicinity of the extreme southeast corner of the subject site and terminating at the extreme southwest corner of the site, but not interfering with the greenbelt preserves. 2 . The execution of Restrictive Covenants providing for participation in area wide traffic improvements not to exceed those contained within the traffic analysis for the project. 3 . Access road completion shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. Staff,in consultation with the City Attorney,may substitute methods other than covenants, if possible, to bind the land and applicant and which accomplish the above conditions. The Variance is denied., ORDERED THIS 13th day of August, 1986. FRED J. KAUFMAN HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of August, 1986 to the parties of record: Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle, Wa. 98104. First City Equities SA-057-86 & V-058-86 August 13, 1986 Page 10 Royce Berg, Architect LPN Architects 114 Vine Street Seattle, Washington, 98121 TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of August, 1986 to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Richard Houghton, Public Works Director Larry M. Springer, Policy Development Director Members, Renton Planning Commission Ronald Nelson, Building & Zoning Director Glen Gordon, Fire Marshal Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Renton Record-Chronicle Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5: 00 P.M. August 27, 1986. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner' s decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk, accompanying a filing fee of $75. 00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. .., e........... , . . — , • . - . I . , ., . - I I t '1. ?•,1 • .6‘4 ' . • / - SA-057-86, V-058-86 •_ ADMAC (FIRST CITY EQUITIES) 41ili,';• i , .. . . .. . ' ' - '-' • "' '1',0,:,'' ,... - : 14 ' 1 1 Ili NACHES AVE.SW , t .• d , _., ).• I 'Ai'ile; Cc' P 113) • ; ' I:trirkl• ...,,,—..0. • f 0 ,'4,044 liii.r.giir.filiiititirkalrig4- t . ,.. 'v:d Lt r : 1 , , rk , . • kre . • J. 1 V 1 1,h, ,It i ..—.....--, 1 _ f• ,.., 1.,,i0.,, 41Wii,' iiit i'f'f•14 • ii, . 1 VA if,. 11:1: 1,,,i 1 . , . I• , --1 . • . Vif iiii '1 I .1 , , . 1 I Ii! ,., . ei,vis,i iir• ' Alverol,,,,y ,IKACIP." , li /I, ' I ct 7 i ?491....eitzfii,t.eit.Ci• . ',.107.11,*.gir , °V -,t igl,/,'• r 1 b,-c 1 It it i • ste, ........,4 , ) ! It 41, ... :.-.,„ , -..f,.. ..., i • 1,,,). , ill, t • .t,y, , % t POWELL AVE. I I it: -* 1 , • •• • • . . .. . ............=. 111,1 .. . .:., f. „,,.,.4. ....,..,.-,,,,,,,, I ,1 i,.,..,• • , CORPORATE PARK ,,.1.:1,f,Ili igiiii. PlBracCiticyREiqvuEltIRes •ADMAC . • . ..%I ... , 'to ill Menton.Waehtn on • ggt LO, 'It i4.1-4 - ... :.11.f.;...i.it,:',:t f ' „., • i' 6, fl 1 ti 1, Y' SA-057-86, V-058-86 ---- o. ADMAC (FIRST CITY EQUITIES) • - ' f, i _ �� ' i ......,„&t,....,--- # • . � t � We6--- } x , _ ,,,_ � ., Tau a .,1 . � _� .� , sOrL \ 0 . • qV t \Il 4 : t r , I i , _ t ( Vi:.„ � �I- i h a — ,� ra 41 eee 2 , _: : ttttt �.,, • __ I Hai etv I 1 9.•0� ' / ' 1 . 1 1„ j f 'L. M j / m. ('\ i;.1II�IIII(_ /` -,) al 11 pi i . 111.:71-1.v. g t ; \ '' II mil{ .ffC Y / _ '4.( I •• .d + ," 1 Oi i�li IS I liDo{t' II i•3' + 1'! mill:gun I 9s s r ?�- ! - 1 l l(l 1/1 .!lid I { .i,..•�I t l I,.11'a 1•If1-I J. i \/, 71 1 ► I �! , l:.,': I� Iliiisi;ida,. [�;, I�-� :, :`i,, ,i,a S ry calla KI II 11 SI1-t`I: 11 i ra..,..:s n .` B z m j � ::�lai 1+ I Ii°il`lat to 0 9 !;!!°I+lia:+ Ity93 'Il�(it 1i r.�+a [!.tf F� �1 {tl" F ,-,i-` r. `I:1..t'!!l- 't 1 !={ 1' ! �li,•: 11 1-• ,, i .,C,3-1. /1 i ellYhI'6 I a l:1.;l I I t i°a'i{,I ll,: ii.i i,ll FI t ''- !:'iaaa, i i i +i 1:,i1 i-+ Pi i 1 a! t-Ii-i t ■iG� �� j :!'as.a+a �, i r j 1=', l�i `'`7`t'tu � .1_a'1'1a 1 liI• Neill iii°:; !. ,:, IS I1' j!; i;; c ! r 11i I ti•,•1•ial'1! ! j_�• ; -1- �^ e'i l"`+; i!�'t: li ° iii3 Ili ::�3�3,!''li�i` rit,t�l,�:! _ 1113_EO�.u��,`�IItali a,::'a1+, II as 01 lI +1iail , ii tt! i ltl11 1!1! ! ' ra.tl..{, .. S 3::?t!: ,. l�fillll€Ii E: t!%a'€IFt�llll! �I !LjL Mot Gtq&winosM ?4MIrc BlackRiver Corporate park ADMAC Buildin Bonton,Washington 9 • f K No. . . . . . . . , . , , . , . . . . • 1 , • . . . • • • SA-057-86, V-058-86 . ... .. . ' ADMAC (FIRST CITY EQUITIES) . , , . , . . , . _ • . •• . . . • . . • . -• i 1 1111 . . • - ;. - 63 1.- • . 1: . i 111 Pi . . .... .:, 11Q11. I . .. . m.....i•3. 1 a I I•ir. .t. I IIMI — 1—i r . • ., .1..-._11 2 ,M1 . ' 111 _ Ip ‘ 11_, osp . 1. 1 A . ri1IT ,IIit • Rill a • rum: 1 IIIIIMINI Mr N. I I . -___ 1 t 1 1. ..13 L.1'. I II MI ,7-..„,.... . -- : , 7 11 i : . . . • • U.-V 11111 .11 —— , I. 1 ' • . . • : 11111 i 11 I ' • • • 'I ! , . , . , . . . • , . . . , a ' . I . . a i A.. . 4. - C. . Ca . 10 ... ii" — , 1 1 . . .. ,_ 11 . ,i,...s. __, • • ,. i4?, t —•BilackRiver Corporate Park 11'...„,• ADMAC Building• /4 .1",.'.•• r i i --,-- ...t. r-•.:.,iv,- ' Renton,WashIngtoc! . i 1,.,•,....,# II f',''.1' , ...trammam. ,• ••• • — ms..........,1 — \ _. ___ • - . i , P 6C ND�L ' Pe_a-R.. {ve H1 1 . . 2, „ 'C-'s111-z. i .1..0 Ill !. , ' is1),S8f. '• ' . I {5____ . i. . . . . .. : - -i- - .5,..,..,...,,,... .„. . , . . , 7r- . II- 'N-1- ..,,,L, ' . 1 I I N I l i ,�• ,,' ,iD,lc-�`I �'.+" a,->'I^ ..el`'9ry'yya Tl ,. 1 `l i � ;�.y` mw,F, 1a I I I �a I, ' .; ., tk n,n'a,., .��i . I _____ l' I 1': 's.L y 1 ,9r 1 - — T ` terT- - „ at 4'' e,'.4,:t-=' s;iw,�I,s}, 4 �t! it 'ft ./. 7- T4•/; D p P/J ). II iii.,, • -� �\ Ate I • coo 'y� ° 7 p a� uc 0 1 \ 'iFa i° .y •tij ' 11 a `'c{ I �} 4i I} j 1, It --- - .__7=.i i 1 ;, M E T R \•', ,:,, ,� 1 .. , Nt • D I S P O S A I L. 1 I ��1NEa °�� .'', , ,.\ 14 _ —ecs�p° ,.,TrtrtflilTi.9 :elfin iLAM I1 I FIRST CITY EQUITIES SA-057-86 V —058-86 '{n APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES TOTAL AREA — 4.3 ACRES `'‘ PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 7TH ST TO PROPOSED NACHES AVENUE EXISTING ZONING M—P, MANUFACTURING PARK • s, s EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY ' + PROPOSED USE TWO STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE, WAREHOUSING & MANUFACTURING USES ,,Ai s 0 ` COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION — OFFICE *f ;ill I COMMENTS ? + + } — - - - - ' 1 et—v r i i C0@V OF RENTON 2536Z N P' 13 \Ill i CITY OF RENTON ``'— J U L 311986 HEARING EXAMINER f3UiLDING/c:CN{N3 DEPT. PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 5, 1986 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PLAID PANTRY Application for conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a B-1, Business Use, zone as part of a Plaid Pantry store, file CU-015-86; property located at the southwest corner of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Blvd. 'N( FIRST CITY EQUITIES Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, file SA-057-86; and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet, file V-058-86. Property located on the east side of Nachos Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. .3024Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY 'REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 5, 1986 APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES FILE NUMBER: SA-057-86 V-058-86 A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. 0 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: First City Equities 2. Applicant: First City Equities 3. Location: (Vicinity Nap Attached) Located on the east side of Neches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. 4. Existing Zoning: H-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: R-2, Residential-Two Family; and H-P, Manufacturing Park 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option - Office 7. Size of Property: ± 4.3 acres 8. Access: S.W. 7th Street to proposed Neches Avenue 9. Land Use: Undeveloped 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped Property East: Undeveloped Property South: Manufacturing/Office Uses West: Undeveloped Property C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File . Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 Apr. 14, 1959 * Corrected --- 1756 may 19, 1959 * Corrected --- 1928 Dec. 12, 1961 Rezone (G to ) R-432-79 --- --- Rezone (G to H-P) R-129-80 3694 Dec. 24, 1982 Lot Line Adjustment LLA-013-84 --- Sept. 23, 1983 Preliminary Plat " PP-089-84 --- Dec. 4, 1984. Special Permit SP-090-84 --- Dec. 4, 1984 Variance V-091-84 --- Dec. 4, 1984 Special Permit SP-024-86 --- May 20, 1986 D. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the site plan request, file SA-057-86, and variance request, file V-058-86, subject to the following conditions: r \ PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 1_.__' HEARING EXAMINER ' FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86 "`'4�, i' Y AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 2 - 1. Execution of restrictive covenants:requiring participation in future taffic improvements. .. ' . 2. Construction of Neches Avenue S.W. and the emergency access road from Powell Avenue S.W. prior to framing of the building. 3. The preparation and filing of a legal document that permanently reserves the necessary right-of-way for the construction of Nachos Avenue S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to oaksdale Avenue S.W. for an industrial collector arterial. f j II_ . : ` �� '-r e. ice:/ • °- :C 1 ---i----1463. - _—___. • ,-,, '9 , . i 0. A - 1 \ , 1 ailille I• , . L-1\4,.'P'.....:-r... -..:11:1-I I '11-'if IS.' 4 LI -- X .14 __1 1 1 \ 11 iti' I / - .. \ , /X iii i .41 1 ! bA __ _ mf .... i _ L_., \\ 0'4,'.f:-.11 ! i ., - % k'1_-: _—_-7-.L:-. h I 410 . . � -• , ' ' i . i -- 400 de 3fIif. --+� •� -- � ' t - 1— / N /• i, , Yam.. - - I ‘ . — -ii li i ; i / i i to,', Mei&i 1 i if 0. i 1. 5 R t Ill a `j'1.1`` ' . slaw: CC j 1` %� -1 , ! t 0�• ii 1. d i i iiti 3 { i i S i E�'ii[ t -1 _Ai 14. 0 i L!! jf llis i iiiil 1�1i 1 oi1 ll,l 11lil(il_f,,. p i � i 0111 ii i 1, { t0i,i i i ii1.!�li1 11l � „ i • r lsc . . I4141 .` h,,i�y 11 i,. 1ii1iiiti:°lc [ li I i .li[ li Iiite 1.1Q.i 'ill1!tl li� � Ei:i l F1; Il �'t•'lil 1p1ii� i1 1 lc16 01 i j ` i11111 i E 1-i9i; 1 1 I iF9.lii 1,' plii 1' f+o':ieiee,I.lai ell! ![!i•ilf° i lil, i1. ..!! �:_.:� /l! ,. r ..6..1 I, d ili..d.it , .i ! lie•: ,;,,.[ �: ,.��'7. isl!a SrI�. F [ i 1."•Icli . E. l•l ,I' I.F •-i{=1{.!�.I.• , It?,,lEr . .t. ti• li f7 i i I =1 ■C" ^��11/ iia:tll�it ! 11i1,iI1j� �� a;i 111�ii [i c{tloel[F!'li i� (!V /Uil G,,` V•I�X ti:•ii.++ i! = a- a 6i a i a' fil,:ei;ia I! �s�.��u��,�,�.. iiil73,?i .e .ii11::Y1s .s }.iii7il:?�' eF � `i��i lilt 5 t 1 i First City E¢i![les mum48 I BlackRiver Corporate Park :: i 6 • ADMAC Building �. i 1 !'., Renton.Washington 2536Z CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 5, 1986 AGE-ND A COMMENCING AT 9:00 A.M.: COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR,RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING The applications listed are in order of application number only and not necessarily the order in which they will be heard. Items will be called for hearing at the discretion of the Hearing Examiner. PLAID PANTRY Application for conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a B-1, Business Use, zone as part of a Plaid Pantry store, file CU-015-86; property located at the southwest corner of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Blvd. FIRST CITY EQUITIES Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, file SA-057-86; and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet, file V-058-86. Property located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. s � 43017Z BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING AUGUST 5, 1986 APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES FILE NUMBER: SA-057-86 V-058-86 ' A. SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: First City Equities 2. Applicant: First City Equities 3. Location: (Vicinity Map Attached) Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. 4. Existing. Zoning: M-P, Manufacturing Park 5. Existing Zoning in the Area: . R-2, Residential-Two Family; and M-P, Manufacturing Park 6. Comprehensive Land Use Plan: Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option - Office 7. Size of Property: ± 4.3 acres 8. Access: S.W. 7th Street to proposed Naches Avenue 9. Land Use: Undeveloped 10. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Undeveloped Property East: Undeveloped Property South: Manufacturing/Office Uses West: Undeveloped Property C. HISTORY/BACKGROUND: Action File Ordinance Date Annexation 1745 Apr. 14, 1959 * Corrected --- 1756 May 19, 1959 * Corrected --- 1928 ' Dec. . 12, 1961 Rezone (G to ) R-432-79 --- --- Rezone (G to M-P) R-129-80 3694 Dec. 24, 1982 Lot Line Adjustment LLA-013-84 --- Sept. 23, 1983 Preliminary Plat PP-089-84 --- Dec. 4, 1984 Special Permit SP-090-84 -- Dec. 4, 1984 Variance V-091-84 --- Dec. 4, 1984 Special Permit SP-024-86 --- May 20, 1986 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: ' 1. Utilities: a. Water: A 12-inch' water line is located along S.W. 7th Street and along the proposed Naches Avenue S.W. • j t • • � r , PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ' _ HEARING .EXAMINER, u` FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FI:LE .SA-057-86/Y-058-86 AUGUST 5, 1984 PAGE 2 b." Sewer: A 12-inch sanitary sewer line is located along S.W. •7th Street and' along the proposed.Neches Avenue S.W. c. Stortn'Water Drainage: , Storm water flows into, the Black River drainage\ system. • 2. Fire Protection: Provided- by the City:of Renton',as per ordinance requirements, ; . 3. . Transit: Metro' transit routes No. 1.99 and No. 340 operate along ' S.W: '.7th Street to Lind Avenue S.W.,' approximately' 0.4 of a mile southeast of the subject property;:; 4. Schools . a.` Elementary Elementa ' Schools: N/A i�. Middle: Schools: N/A. c. High 'Schools N/A. 5. Recreation: N/A - E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING',CODE 1. Section:4-730 'Manufacturing (M-P). 2. Section;4-722(G), Variance. 3. Section 4.-734(F)(2), Landscaping Requirement - Green River. 4. Section 4-738, Site Plan Review.: F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: ; . ''' i 1. . 1.; ; In4ustr.ial Goal-'and Objectives,` City. of :Renton, Comprehensive'Plan compendium,- March -19.86,..`p.. 18,-19. 2. Green River Valley,Po.licy Plan, City of Renton, Comprehensive Plan • • Compendium, March 1986. 'p; 31-50. G. DEPARTMENTAL ANALYSIS:: , r • 1. The,applicant, First City;;Equities,; is,-;requesting site plan - approval to allow the 'constriction;of a building containing 93,170 square;,feet on, a 4.3 acre 'parcel. Tte..applicant is.also requesting • a; variance to allow:the`construction of a:cul-de-sac 'street (Neches • Avenue S.W.);;that exceeds 500 feet in:'length. . 2. The building site is being;designed to allow the futu a expansion - of .the-tjusiness,`ADMAC. The ;two story structure will be constructed of ,painted 'concrete panels along with reflective and tinted glass.;,:' The intent:of• large'.expanses' of: glass is 'to reflect the natural vegetation preserved that the applicant proposes crest ng alongthe south property. ' ern, boundary?of the 3. A 'fifty (50) foot wide .landscaping :strip has.'been set aside to continue and enhance the' "natural preserve";.that was.'required to the west of the subject site as ,part of the._Black,River Office Park development proposal. Thezdrainage system: will be developed: into an amenity. • 4. The Environmental Review Committee issueda .MitigatedDeclaration of Non-Significance based upon the',fact that the applicant would dedicate and construct;Neches' Avenue.,S W. ;from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac to, :the!:north:associated with. the.,ADMAC Building. The appeal',period will expire at 5 p:.m:.'on July 31, 1986. 5. Various City?Departments reviewed the proposal'':. The Police •Department ,and Building Division of the Building and Zoning Department recommended approval without conditions. The other department comments as follows r ' PRELIMINARY REPORT TO 7 HEARING EXAMINER ' -- FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86 r , AUGUST 5, 1986 - PAGE 3 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: APPROVEDI,WITH CONDITIONS . , , July 9, 1986 ' 1. . This proposal is consistent with.the Comprehensive Plan land . _ .use designation of; Manufacturing Park/Multiple Option (Office) and the existing M-P zoning. for the subject:site. It is also • compatible with the existing land uses in. the vicinity. . 2. It should be a condition of approval with the Hearing Examiner that all significant trees (particularly therpouglas Firs r located. in the southeast corner of the- site),be.,•;retained as . much as possible and per the concurrence of the City's . Landscape Architect. ' 3. The request for variance on the cul-de-sac appears reasonable and not detrimental to existing uses; provided, however, that it is for a. specific limited time and is definitely to be replaced with a permanent full connection to Oaksdale Avenue. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING- DIVISION: APPROVED WITH .CONDITIONS • -June '30, 1986 . , Participation. in latecomers for traffic signals at S.W. 7th and • Hardie.and Powell and Grady. . . Applicant shall determine traffic volumes (AWDT) from this ; development assigned to each of these intersections. DESIGN ENGINEERING DIVISION: APPROVED.WITH CONDITIONS Powell Avenue S.W. does not appear that it will be extended 'any further to the north. Therefore, the cul-de-sac• which was . . temporary should be completed to: include,.cur- and-,gutter 'drainage and sidewalks together with .any other necessary appurtances. UTILITY ENGINEERING • NOT APPROVED • July 11, `1986 • • Sewer Latecomers Fee - .HDK • $81,47.1.82 Water and Sewer- System-Development I '• "• ' • . Charge of $0.04 p'er •square•4`oot . ,'; $25,215.44.. • • , • . $12,607.72 for. each,:--- r . .!1 • ' • Require over-all vicinity map showing all phases of Black River ' Technical Park with square footages written in each parcel. FIRE DEPARTMENT: . : . . NOT' APPROVED 1. All weather surface required for Fire Department access. 2. Bollards not approved for use. . 3. Parking not allowed on emergency: access road: • .4. : Access easement from Powell Avenue S.W. must.be in prior to framing. All Fire Department access roads must be all weather- - surfaced with asphalt/concrete prior to framing. VARIANCE/V-058-86 (Allow_ a cul-de-sac street over 500 feet in length) The following' analysis shows that the variance request is appropriate with the four (4) criteria under Section 4-722(G). 6. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is • necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject, • including size, shape,- topography, location or surrounding of the . subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges ' enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under . identical zone classification. H PRELIMINARY REPORT TO '�..-,,HEARING •EXAMINER FIRST CITYEQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/v-058-86, AUGUST 5, 1986. PAGE 4 The hardship. is `created.by,.the (1) ,size, , (2) •shape,' and. (3) location of .the property.� ,The ADHAC site is: the southeastern most'lot .inthe development of Black River' Office Park. The total'industrial/gffice park' is a'veryunusual long irregularly shaped parcel'because of thepreservation of.a portion•:of 'the.natural. riparian forest`associated. With the old •Black' River' channel. ' Access'is further limited, by,the fact that,the entire northern boundary, of the' office .park is bprderad by railroad.tracks? • 7. That the;granting of tie variance will:'not:be`material.ly ' detrimenta1Wthe ;public ,ielf'are or injurious;to' the.;.property 'or improvements in:.the 'vicinity. and'zone in:which 'the subject property is' situated.' , : -,The',Fire Department• has 'implied that unless. t• he...roadway access 'is 'inst'alted prior T'to the construction of :framing .o f the ' building' ttiatJhere':will be`a materially..detrisiental impact • upon. the subject.property. It appears..that if the emergency - .access question satisfactorily .answered then'. the proposed•` var ance..;will not `create' a:,access, problem:';•., ' . A problem:.will exist: if the;development'of: the remainder of the :Black River Office;Park :is not developed along with; the. intended' extension ofNachekAvenue'S:W, `;to Oaksdale Avenue •Therefore, `it'is.`suggested that at.a"minimum the applicant,, grant 'to..the city-`.of Renton 4rioryto issuance` of a'building permit a permanent reservation. forjhe location . industrial. collector .street:,: 8. That approval shall.:not 'constitute a. grant `.of'•special privilege inconsistent..with;-the`:limitation upon:uses .of other,properties in the vicinity and'.zone :in which the sut;jact property';is situated. The. subject site' Is so'unique' that we do`"not-have a comparison with ..other properties in 'the vicinity. It 'may grant special privilege,;, but.=iti'is ,the only way. to. utilize the subject site without'developingjth'e entire street. " 9. That the, approval as deterMined.•by',the''Examiner or. Board of Adjustment;, is ;a:minimum variance';that.will' accomplish .the desired purpose: . . • Based;upon the,design', and the fact,that the ADMAC project is the next logical extension"of Nacfies Avenue S:W.; the variance requested; is the-minimum .necessar`y`:to`allow emergency access • • to the subject site . SITE PLAN/SA-057786 . • 1Q. The applicant has not'provide. calculations'.,supporting the• on site parking-shown 'in- the plans:. . The'applicant will, have, to provided them during the public nearing process.,to assure the Ci y-that the site is actuallyl,being used 'as a manufacturing/office facility instead of: purely'..office.. 'The 'site':plan':as:`present complies with the. specifics, of the Zoning'.Code . ',The 93,922tisquare foot building . is divided,in function°.and requires sparking`based' upon; the Y . following analysis.: •• . • 7 'PRELIMINARY REPORT TO Th.. BEARING EXAMINER FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86 , AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 5 . 11. Section 4-738 (D) provides the basic site plan review criteria. It appears that all are complied with: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; e. Conservation of area-wide property values; . f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; g. Provision of adequate light and air; . h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; i Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. ISSUES: 11. The primary design issue deals with off-site construction of access. The City must be assured that Neches Avenue S.W. is constructed to connect S.W. 7th Street and Oaksdale Avenue S.W. . : Even though the proposal is acceptable for both primary and emergency access at this time, the issue of when should Neches Avenue S.W. be completely installed is critical and must be addressed at this time. The applicant appears to be developing the property in small parcels without going through a formal subdivision. This is legal as long as they retain ownership of the land. A condominium plat or a binding site plan approval could be completed on the property. The applicant should commit at this time to designating and permanently reserving the necessary right-of-way for the Neches Avenue extension. The applicantshould be required to construct Neches to minimum emergency access standards at the time of development of the next parcel to the north. The parcel immediately west of Neches from the subject site possibly could be accessed without the complete extension of Neches. The applicant would have to present supporting information at the time of development. 12. The Public Works Department has commented that the applicant should participate in latecomers fees at the intersections of S.W. Grady Way and Powell Avenue S.W. and S.W. 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S.W. These latecomers agreements are offical documents of the City and bind the applicant:: ` . 13. The traffic engineering report prepared by The Transpo Group recommended mitigation for the entire Black River Technology Park (pages 24 to 27). The Environmental Review Committee did not require implementation of any of those improvements at this time; however, the issue is whether this project should eventually pay its proportional share: The study suggests it should, but there needs,to be legal conditions imposed requiring participation. Therefore, we would recommend the filing of restrictive covenants requiring participation to their proportionate share of the identified mitigating measures. The Transportation Management Plan should be implemented at this time. PRELIMINARY REPORT TO ' : HEARING EXAMINER FIRST CITY EQUITIES, FILE SA-057-86/V-058-86 • AUGUST 5, 1986 PAGE 6 H. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above analysis it is recommended that the Hearing Examiner approve the site plan request, file SA-057-86, and variance request, file V-058-86, subject to the following conditions: 1. Execution of restrictive covenants requiring participation in future taffic; improvements. 2. Construction of Naches Avenue S.W. and the emergency access road from Powell Avenue S.W. prior to framing of the building. 3. The preparation and filing of a legal document that permanently reserves the necessary right-of-way for the construction of Naches Avenue. S.W. from .S.W. 7th Street to Oaksdale Avenue S.W, for and, industrial collector arterial. • € r rlil r_ZL-r•fj— —T SCHOOL ',,,,,, -,, r ^ • ,r t' 9e4 cN_ r` r• 7 e . .�` 17 • • I• f e r . fI,1 f�• \c;\ �14 ''.'4 1 -• - 1 :�•JL [ 11WtLUflI9JFti _7f.j Se• T i'.'vt' —Th. �� • ' 0 1 \ 12 1 " . J v Rift ta.,:i ai..„).44; r__r 1 • 1/40.. ......1 IN I ( de SK f Af. a "7 aL ~ �i \ 5�1/��'//tit/7,,, g��/q .1 •VA . . .11: . R-2 ti../ig- "' 41%. ," ash .i "`, .• ` .d.. I •- Sic., Poo• el tf• re � '. �� q,`' 1: ' r .5. 1 ;I � 1 I W Ji�W •-1•....... =W J (. I , I NI E T R � ' \\ ,, y I ,r p 11 1 Z ‘ • Q I - r - • Z'r--- tQ-1- —kf) \I' I— - ; — --1 1...--- 6 t! D I S P O S A L I �' �..f G cl'i,, 5,° IN I1 1 N°R 6N `.rrT 11ii li • El I FIRST CITY EQUITIES • SA-057-86 V -058-86 1 APPLICANT FIRST CITY EQUITIES , TOTAL AREA - 4.3 ACRES ,PRINCIPAL ACCESS S.W. 7TH ST TO PROPOSED NACHES AVENUE • EXISTING ZONING M-P, MANUFACTURING PARK EXISTING USE UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY - . PROPOSED USE TWO STORY BUILDING FOR OFFICE, WAREHOUSING & MANUFACTURING USES COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MANUFACTURING PARK/MULTIPLE OPTION - OFFICE COMMENTS . I •• , 1 , .:. , ;. ::,:. -,•', ,4i o ..• • • • •-ii-.4-•-•• • , V • ,. •4 . ,. - ' Mb•,,s• . - UM,• 'ViIIIIII •,, 2:07,, ,: BM '.. ; ..„(`•,1 ,Ogogo:40:44.,.. ..... ,:,„".,....g.g..,, . . 7 .; 0 0 0 •0 • • • . • - ` -.:41111111.1111111 '''')''',:.oogogogago . o •,:o • o • :I 0 . 0 • •1 . A , , 'I I o o oocbo,, < • • .-••-•• • .:Og.0.. / 4, II '' - - ‘ IMMI ; 'iii3Stit',)Sia'. .0-- .04...:0: -- ' P4!4IFr.;1:ggg°2gggg'. '.0"06•C.0 - .:gogo: ill • ,co 0 6 ,0 . • 'W.4' ... c..°I• iiiioll•41111111111,. . .•: :' ;..1I'.:•2ggiSlgo:' ,fl.!A.' ' ;7-'—'---=• .7.1'1:1‘.. '•••.: : "Oe 90 ' ,1: ',' : . '. . . ',,. ' 'Niiiii'llilli i Ili. : ,:, ,,:jh MEiliii..., •i,70:0:, l',"1111111,111115:06.0.06.0:0_.frii ,..1' •••• Iliniii:L 1,,,,N g i .7w :kp'-'..Igggligcia, s•...0*:,P )::::,:aAritaill IS 0 620 to?:1)ij A- '. -, .-. i 1 a .. Aikiiiismk,..v.*,, . , . . L :iiii: gogosogogogo. .0g.g. fr--,,----,----4,k,,---, --..•... , •i, .. ... 1 ,:i::112 ogogag.:30gog. .0000 ii9,11111 Illzirit„ .. Ar i 9 ,. . , , „ . ,f,,,,,., ,., ;77.1 -. . ...:.ge 0000000.00000. c'o°• op i MO.• '.. 0 glirk 000g00000g0g0°0),' • t,0°•141 .ii.:—..4, wilif,,, „ ,,..... ,,,4,. , ,1 Mill ' : ..' ' ,-. 'r EMI 0 0 0 0 o 0 o°0•• ''',"0°• 1 I ' .... I U ST ' .,•,;(10.0.0N\ - "'•,•41..e 1 '-6-? . Mill .ggggao°°gggggo°2040°°.o',IIII/1".... go.%• IR Itilailtlial .:4"...,;:%, • • 0 0 0 • in .•., .. . . o.0.0.0020?0 goo!)2Mill • ' •g0g0g0g0., ;' ,, k • lirirwroaokm,i- olimhi. ,.1--ii ,k*wi.itts insimai111.794,',A111,-- , •• . I • !Iklif1/414Ski211;;4.--"*114:114141.,'77.71 ::,.`e?‘!.,•••,:'!"ft, ''.ik-, ' . ', '.' . , • .. -46Setv. . —ions . ..0 000000. • commei bos..-..v9.i.,...,r i i .-i..., , '. ,, , .• ,.,.,,,,•‘3,Q.',),::::: . ''. ...;.•.,,J.,,,,..11ri,c. 'farafe ern•ogogogoo°000000 tr.`paormuLt.,-,v,,,,i,e,.. t ,c:ogogogogo,,so. i.411111:111Lisit " ••;041.;,(.. i ...--4:EA.,, ,•, ,10 • fel ....... .,-;,.. xt,.5 1 inimpiggs, o o o 0 o, Ali.3:111:141.0.:•3, , ,,...,_.:&....,.,......?„,,,,,t,i Q 4 • '-4 ' .::::: :':::*:::•:•.. •i',..0 ,, - .,.. 1,4 111111&."\*.iii I eir.,::--LiC•-•-,..dleme'.,s•ameitime• Pommes orewswera..°Vd*.Y---. 1W14..r2LIIL.4-•'',,`. 2 '.- .; . ,::i:i:i:i:i:i:i:i:::::.:i*i:]:,?;:i::::.:.,...''' 's`...;',,L.;, 0..,(7.3..,(r.,,-•„ *. k 111114117t1A,Mimi o 4-iiill'untingii:::P§,..A.*71':."--,--:.: . ..:'1.----...1.•4 'co.,. . .0 :,•:•:•:•:•:•,•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:.x.:......:,....,. /1 • (sq.et) ‘• \ar . ,, .::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.)^,n,;'.,‘ ;,%••„ "..; ,... ._,- • • ' ii,..aerTilii; ie.,. __,,. -111:11:11121.,.!..r.r..1 ' ;,•:;i12 t. , ' ; Ntk,'f' 3',,7 -;• r;'.A:igii:i:i:i::•*:•*:*:::::'''''. .':-. A'%4"P•N'•::•,.,-ii-'•41'i:v:‘,\10.- ' * 1,•'-''''dll "VI IIIIII!•••.......•• lie •10•T• , „ ...,,s 4- ,.,.... ,,K%. . ; ., - ::N::.*i*iiii::::::: :''' ,ti.,),.,: 3;,iii,"7- . - ,Q,•$-...,.•••,,::',.,'4\ " "kif, Olaamaated°'*cne'NI .111111•!:11111' r , ormaimer .:•,•0.,••,...,•,: •,;:vi.t....1,p•vfn cl • .. ••• 1‘11;111441,. :%.,•420ar;!..!:filsomer( "?:‘;'''••••,,. •-:reti.1:-.&.;`•:', 11 \ • . :i:i:'::::iiigiiii]:iii:::: .;;-•b;,:.,-." - ----'- ••---- - 'Niii ,,,,,,, Ili-, dia.. 0 .•••0 Ina. ,.2.,,,....r,. .• , • 0,.6,,,,c4..•. •4•.40;bovri,,,, : :•:•:•::::::::::::::::::::::::: •,.,..:,• • ----------7-------r- -:'e ••0111,...".,.,,,..r,.„. ___Ast .. o, tr....•. 3,...,. . . \ •.\. „ m: .•,.,,,,,,,,..,,......•..0-., ,,.....,0 . . .., , . ,,\, . ::;: iiRiiimi: ,.:1.-•._--------_-_---1-----=-:-_--_--- \--,_ -::::::.::::.•:,;;:„.•::::::•:::- ...400k, 1°..k ' A •Mil: : 1 • , ' 0.••. •-,:-,... ......TY''"F:f.. ' ' :::*t:::::::::::::::::• , '•" -.--- .---,,---_-_-:--_-_-_ , •':. :'•:•:i.::.i:::i:i:.:•:::i:i:i:A::::•::i'-i0:.::;', Mimi°• -„/A,..k, 4, , . • ‘-.':...,,;:a', -•r ......:•:•:•:.:•:•:. ,- „,..,...•. ...,.....--,-, ______ •-.:.:,:.:•:•:,:.:•:::.7,:.::,..:,:.:.:.:.., 01 . •--' ..:t.::*:::.::.:. . • v,...1,,i.-.•:--...,,,,.-:,....--.-.E..e. _-L--_-_- , •-•.:::::::::::-:::..::::::::::::::.; .,..illklki. p Eirt; , ,, . -------- ., . ,:;;;;;:::.„,„.. ,,,,-:,,,,....-,,,,„,,s,:-. .,,...,.. ,.., :-,----,. /.,. -=-__„ "..A.:..*i:i*i:i::i2 " ' •V),'-'.`...,•'••‘:: :•.‘ 1 • , •."Ih41:11 lit, 11 • ' III k . i• . ...;,',1.;,,•1;,;••:•, \\.,1,._t.'22,.•':; ••••';'4'.;,'..??,,,;,,,',r,', i,,,e,i'C'• !_-_-111._le.1' 1..-.-,_..,,-_.,,77..17,-__-,--.::.,7..7"...ft..,_,Ii,...,A,. LI ,j'alikk.„\WMNPALIIIII...4 '•• ' 1' i6.. • • ''''. ,.`d:',f ----., .,.\,vi-- „----..,-. _.:,..„‘ .,1, e, -_-_-__-.0tftar_-- - .,,-_-„-.---- 1.1wir.2rsigzw. **4...,.#41! ,. N 1: • ' _ , !,, , ,„.0.),..,-,r-.„,i,........\ )1' , .•000000000. ; / 4:<••• ,,- 7-_-JAP-_,1140- ,0 0 0 0-•. ,, _______ ___:_-_ ,_-__:_-_ ,_,-_.: ElliVISIBIll q 11 .gogi '''' . , - •00• i•,00 I , ) ,..tp •00. ' 'dr:1,:f4.11` '-,---,-- .0°00°00VOV,.• i•..7--------1-)-- --1---• ---,-- It (;:1-.7,1*.• -. --'----'=---- •00000000 ',•------------,..,._-_Z..-1.71,_-72-_-% I' .0.11•!..7 I , ; , III •:/Kei.T.°;,' I ... --- 4•,..N.4; 6; ---------- ;:?0°0°81,°oVo°o°o":2"..---.=-77----- "..t:---latvitscr ....... ....r.:Att•I 1•111111511!!prom, . i 1 • /'%>;,. ' . •-sr,C.',4.1--',..4:',' 0000000p0000;:. .....-a_ . .,_ __.±:,...,•_„,•_-- • .... _er-oill1111 ,skS, ••• .•:.::::::::::•:•.. •;,?;,,•:.,•c.,'t.s•‘'‘:::,,:`',.',-;:e.,',.1,3 ,.,`% ..• • ,c,. i. •(pr.- 'V --- ".cl0000000000•.c:*. ---- •-----,--,- ., evos : - ,-- 1... ,r4.,,,i..,;.4 •• n• ,,_,-_-..0 o o o o o o c•0 0 0 0 o••.!.7.:._-_-_-_7_, -_---,7.10PkifikiS .... ... 1 II, N ,,: :...y4'':e4;',-,,47:c:. 7 4,...°:::°.:::::::::::::::°0.07:3:::::°°:::::::::::. -1:71.-..cottc__7,.I Ileff:11-- jag- • ' -'" 1:3:tiec. '(:.---1.-777\- -. '''s'''': 7°°0°0°0°0°0°0°°0 0°0°0°0°°..-•''' -_--.'_-_-_-'4";* '_‘' -.7.06;leAr700.40nrellumi•••••••••-•„.•4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: • •••i'•:::'.:,',.'?•:''3. . 2.. . , ,:- , , : • • • 1.560•• •.• • 01--T.- __________..-- .,..,,,, ., ,, --,-.. . ..fillo IhS14 .,..:, -..,':::::::;:::::::::::::i:i:..*i*::i:i:i.. ., tp...v..,. .00.. . , ,,,. . , ,v•• . . .fi• • ....*—'1.--,• - ---..•.--- MV ` ' oh. •••:::iiii:::'iiiiiU-:i:::ii:iii-,s-'` ;;'''..0'1,...%,.. . -.: - ,, .`•;•'. ' ._44, :•• • •t ''!VrairleNiling22 I, .- , . -•-•:-i-::]:?•:.::-...:::::*-::::i:-',I,•.-,:•,•(.<;<rt;(5,,.....k.)<I.\<''•..›. ./ ...a00.01110/i•it,:,.,,,,,,,,,• ';r4PECIIIIIIVIis.,,. _ ,%.__ ,,,1,,,_.._,...._„A„._.:....,,,_,_•,";,,,,\ .4,46 ' 'igu.• ,- .,:•:....::::i,i:i::::::::::). :,. iiromr • .......... . ,' '-•••••,!! -.• _... •ne,,q,.- s , ''' ''%''''' ' iii UN- 4rommei: %'‘. --,--'--- ---- :-•---7- 1•:;:'• cfy„- - 7 :-' Akt,„,:orz."' or- limo "''''Alrolow :'.. --•---------------:- :--_-_-;-_--:::-._ ,.....7.; ..: ' Miff., ., 00 •:::i*„. `!;i- ';',, .: "'''' : • • ' ossra , • . ,,,,,it., • • ',ilia 1 11:1111•,;,. - ---pip mix -----------,--7-I,a, : ; - 00 ::::::::::.. ....;-.4 . . . „....,,, ..... ... imam' F.„-._ -_„ ----.- ----,--7---; •-•.,,,,, fit/ - , ,;)„ :-:.:.:.:.:::.. .,.. . - ,,,,-. ..,,..„..,t• • • . ,...,.. ,,,.."..,... --- -, ----_ . .----. .1.-:,-_,. ..'or, lebb.....1, .-• • mos k c_.; -_ . .o.o.--------- •t• • •• • .t. o°o°o ---•::::::::::::-. '. 1• - •, ‘ 4' 0.°,' 111E11 amoszt,,,a. . , AVMS a',;•,-, --• -,--,Vo 0.--,-i',,..-.C:':, ' ••.. o o 'Ill:•:•:.:•:::::::::.. f, ,e,,-.....:__...- .„_-_-,;_7_- 0000.7-_-_-_-_,-II ..,• - •• I I'• • • IliflEll 1 ,,,,, 0111111 • 111813111111 , . 111•11 mom ..•:,VIVI -- ,,,v,. :.,.., .. ' I, II - IMMO ...,11111•1 , -LI:r'etiltilliallill .,,.,1111111111V II .i..t • ---' -------- ------------: ',•,::(::..* . .. • • , •••• ................. . .... • .....,.•••••••• ,:o. i ' ..-•• .•a•Poomar4....•,-Iitstw m 1 • gi,r e:G•,(..' - ,..... -- - - • - liVililli;...,t,qt11111171.1 _ II; ..... _ • •-,,' IM1111111,`•••,eillIIIMS011iiiiltill I(1 • .; ''", ,' • MitarillinfaCli,•'...:;:>'"_.-''' ' - o o o 0 A- .- . - „ ••::::::::0000000 Ii6tA t,,;;;,....„„ ....r• ), . . it . . ' - • ' •, ilMit'lli,:1' tir III mall II ,, _ - ,....-• -- -,----.,-_• ,,,,„0•7••:. '0 o o 0-al.:CZ; ••", s :::::::.•o o o o0o• • •,,, • ' .11..5111i1 _,-,%;,..;-.III t•:?:-------' •‘.---- ---•-•,'--' • ...1,41, 0000o. ,,,ey,., , •••• 0000000 1 ; .0000• ..v,, .'-',. , , . -.' 411111iiii ','•,111 •+, '''-- *- ---7---- -------7---7-' •=,••• 00000, ,rr . ,:, • 0o00000 •000000• .... ;11111•1411111..;6•,III MIMMY')- • ' ----- -MP Z-Af G--' ':' ' . : 'ono me?.-.fa,.•I pg.' . , ,;,,, ,,, I •. 1.000000 .0000.00. , -..icos, •r•- . ,, ---- '------.----_-_---_- 0••••,. .' ••••05100, ,•• •••;),f. ' ' '' "111111,11 . .I 1 • , . ' . ..'! .A I 11111111111111111..0...1.,.....,',,Y.3::):::?.;.:),.:' 7=7..=.=,==,=.,,. ., ...2.:-:..,:<,',..'1 •.'.. ,)..1.,.I.Hi,;„;:/:i MMMMMMMMM aux.•,,,„-...,;.:„.......:',.,„•-:.„•...,.. _,_-_---_-_-_-_---4.-...-_-_ ,• , ,.., , ,...., .. . •% .- 0 r'-,-r- 0.).,,,,' •,..,...,•.,,,,. ....;,-,,, - ,, —_ _ , __ • ' ..,: , ...:::-.,---•-•.. • - 4 - -, .A N.,.D... U,, .SE.„. ELEMENT . „, .- • , . , , , , . . • . - • . . , . • . • , • ‘,1_-'''..;1(': Single 'Family ' : Commercial , '' . 1 . .. r .7..,::::... -_-14- --&. -_-: . , . ' ' • - c•I'-'r-'‘ w---tridimicy - ".: '' • :J.' ',. - . . . ,._..,. , .. , - , , ' , . , , . i L o. w. 'M: uetnI Fita nily'2 \\\NOffic'e / Office Park , ,.. . . . ..,. . .. :,,_::_=-22.1-_-,7 . . . 14.. ,:,c -ta i• . - ' Medium Density • - ' :0°0°0°0°S 0°:0°030°0°: Public/Quasi-Public , _ . . , . ...,.r.d.u. , .:: . . MU it F•Fanliiy`• ., , . , '_-.... ._. :.,;,..., 4. < • i ..t.. -- ,: h • ., ' - • ' • , • .. , , .1 - ' ', . ' ' ' '• ggaS1 High.Deulnsity.mi y: . •0.•••• , 'i• , . .- ', .----',"" , --,---•• ig:A:V*0 ' , '' ;', •••••• ' Light ,Industrial , •MMM•• • ' ' t , . 1 ' ' ' , PCStrE,( •' Recreation 0:r 14• ' , .43),A. '.': i. : .•43:•0.• 0 Heavy Industrial . • _ ..r. -. :-• .. .„-_,- , ,',1::,.,1 . .., ; ., . a o ,a . . '.Greenbelt-...' -. - - •' --.•_____...._-,_..,__.,,,-, , Manufacturing P ark. . . . , . , . ;•• 7:, - 2, ,:., '„ :,-. : ., 2- :, . . : ,-_,:., . .:.,,,,, , /-- Multiple, Option . . , . , . . ' • I:- • a i'L : ,.......„. , ., r. :- , , . •-, , ,, . ., . „ , • : : . . • . , . . • ...5 . ., .--_,. . . , . , -. - :. , r. . o o "-Jr., . , . , -• ' ' ,',,1, . ' '• - ' ', .. ,,,, • -I' • . _ 2 - . , 0000000003 - 1 Z -", ' . 1 ..''Agg3g3g3g 3g3g381 2 0 ' .• . • , cr,5.1,.:,. 00000,000.00o0o . . . • . ;U.) 0-0 0 o 0 0 . . • E - ..:-.: . . • c. • . a : i• ' lol -i -, '• • -I • , - �•� _- :� TABULATION • __-.. .• \ ` Edll9 Arw • fuss G�t70 SF. EFAiStil - Foo1pM 88.t00�..F.-_ - \ 1 - .• \. - - --covarae. �6.,tX _ • % - .-- �._....7�Ve....... W. `\A_ . . E-I i ` - ��.; `� Total PartYg 201 m ..... I. la CD._ . to ril . . .. \ . - _ ....• ..' . °''..... .... - . \'‘' . . . . ... . . . • - - ..„.........„,„.........:4-.:-.E.F...;:it;:tx.3 ,„ _.,_,._ , _ . . . •'FGe156 frC5r'4. .441..- • ' \ : CO El ��.....�A.. Q. II) H \i • 1 �1 s • W.e...n�� . _ i \V 1,\\\ T /'- Future Phase B. \ U O) CO (O.\ . . . • .): 0.-- . • W. `••� a�,�. CO to V • _C�.�r o — . - I 0- \ c\. •�•, aes s,easit v m a • LEGAL DESCRIPTION x• ' ! ( fll ! liilll(Jiliif 'pIl ( ! Ix!� ii ! ( ( lill�i�; ' ° ' I ' IIIIUll ► 1111111111 Is •. pl .. Phase I t. ".%.,„...___,.___..it.._..!*:,..1, ,f,•.•i,.-"filb. .4. ,.... t , . \'.\ t - ' 20,, 1 1 I I';) I .4 _ .,,...„.:;,..,-._..„. I !I 1 1 I II ,,.\ . \il - . . . -1, - ....e.^4,4-, ' . \ i _. . . I �AII � ! � lll .... '-an-. Nil n: ''- NI s. , .,___1, , -, . . . :_ .. . . • . ... -.-4-: : __._ . . .... . . . . ._ .1 : — v\\- - . . . . , . . , r ADMAC BuIIdhfg Li _ '�• i I: _ I -- 1 - VICINITY MAP No Seats ' I. . ...i_r 0._irll 7\1, .- z , . , _,...,„,„, ..,,,i, . . r , ... , _ . . 1.____, •T7 • .........,. . r„I . , , . . , _ .__ ._ ___ . . ., i 4-e'. :•:17,1"' d , it , _ _-ce.,...re-w-t.1 I. � {aewot i- :I' �',.2 q: exc - t ,7 ,-,:pst•.-- --te a aaawvi � i riam po4 ... „cr. .0, x .u. a.eti v G5 I•.I,FIQ�I -- ` FV �kqk. bto•o �b'0 w �- .1 4 Ms 6mr_ % • ,,.. .. rr o • . ,Ly,,o .....N•e.._ Zrrr.: 3 tT anSiQ3t4:1t�, _ ` ' e.�n�Y�wc . \ SITE PLAN x f ems. ,+-`_ I . I i '.r' •• ° _ _ _ `�..1 � / p Lana.eoo.ar..2 7 8 --_. _ l•. _ J -_ 1 l • I --i l� •.. iJ w.,ap� I + I - .n eaool OCR.o or �. J SITE PLAN I v^'I ...a:Pc, -Ae 1 . . ' -• , • :,, -'. • . . ' .• • 't ' • . . ; , . • . . • • , . . • , ., •. • . • . , . . .. . „ . , . :- . .-'•. .."44 •• '• ., • 'i•, • , ., . •. . , . •.4. . . ,. '7,7•';',''..: .4.42;•."... 4: .•".7•,7:'••• • .: .:' '•.• . . .. , •• , • .:., t . ., . .. . . . . . • . .- . . . . 4, .' ,.., • • ,. . ''••,'••• •.' . ' • .. . • . • . • • .. . .. • . . • .. , . • . . , . . „ • ' . • " • . • . • • • . . . ,. . ' . . • • • , , . • • . • • • . • . , . .. , .. - .' . , .• . •. , • , •:• . :. . . , • . . . • . • . , . • . • . . • • . •"• - . • •. ,-.,•. . . .. . .. • , . .7 . . , . sA-0 7 8 6, V-0.50-8 6 • . . . . • . . . • . , ADMAC (FIRST CITY E . . . ...OUITIES)., . , . ,. • . . • • . . . . . • . , . . . , . . . ,. .. . , - I . • , • ., • , •. , . .. . . . . ., . ..• • •-. .. ., , . • . . . , . 1 t ii,g . . . . . ; .. ,• • ' , , ., g . . :. .. . • . • .. . ' : . . • , NACHES AVE. SW . . . . •. .. • 4 ,_ p--,,,, --v•---.7--: 7r,--7.--7,rio,g) • f.." ' F,,../ .„;..--4.--:,..,-14 ..-., Ar^--t• -',P.'"'iiiiiirailirAlar, - , ilLAPI..L.Pli On • • CAI •%*.r..•7:::;*•:,F: '`•27:7 • 'Hi• 4/41,9147,..211211M-,..1!!'—.40771P,.."•••00. VAtio i . \ ,LA ad !. . ..,' ' •••''.,.. •.*• 4:,•• ••; .•; :dr •••.%•;i' ' . • •••• ,o,s6ns. F .--! , ..-, .:, .- , .,: ‘, -- • . ,,L.I'ir-- ' '• •oitio.Alt: 1 •• • ,..,..,,,.• , t .. •• ,.. . , . • .,•,•,-.,. , .• s, , . --) •A14: ',4;', ' -`....ii0.4ca) :.: . ,.. , .. ,,,: . •. ••,. . „,, ,„,r ,,• litilfir•A., ,*..1 rit,,,ti:„.•74,-: ,•, . ••• -,. • - • - . AV. - ., . • . • IviPtiwk,',V ihrgcliit,„;.44.,-.-41.w.,,.7.1,-.1,....owir-tx,7,,,,...„,. to. . ":vl• '4N:.f.' i":"';—1-Wit‘1,..1._.14.1fflrliltilititiNi. .. .- •.. . , . !IA OPAL igii.!..%1E.101 IF.,--::. , . •:-- ----. --..., .:. •-. •• •.• 3/4' 0 , . . . , . ibl.",,,oettlurk:•.,Arts. ,..-... ..- .., - : .-. •,, , .-•.., ...'• -; •,-, •:•: •:,.. ...--0 . . . • 4,1r ..., •...,?,,,,*.,,, ..,.. , . •, ,.,,, . . ... „..,;., • : ;,,, .:. • .,.. t . . . • , ',Ili k .N-7:''.ti':"..,:i 'L.' O':, '', ' L,:' •_. . ': , ...: '1,.• ; t' :t 1.. 0 • : ..: -•,.=;;', ..':; . , , • ''.'.:. i t...1 t . . :, 41. ••,-•, . .1 . , likr •1 ' . .. I '' • • . ... . , . . , .,s'^' ,r'':=.;.••ii .. :• i ..L: I..• • --••,.,, , .. ''. H ".:71, • N ,,,,,,h,t; , ..,...,.,..,,..:11 •..• •-.• .y • t; , •:-.•, •,• I,:•.; • r •,;••v• . . • •• ,,q tr ,..tcr,,, , , .; . • 4 =R. , . k . •t- Vi,4610,-'•••,:i • , . t , , 1 14 , •Wiii0: il i A, ' > • • ' H. . , . . i.,,,,r- *2.1.. . 1 , 0 kt. . . ... . . .. 1 IV . II- 1 • ..0 • -• • ' :. . -:. - H, ,' t ..... . ( ' ;‘'.`,0"'•:-..00,-.1 ii ' i •• > - 1 J:41••••.-Y,..146:: 1, 4..11,‘ ' P . • • . •I • .1 i ' 24.1103 1 1 ' I •-' '•.' • . , -, • . „ VI .'•44 .'..7, ri, /I Illr:411'•f,'..• • ... .1' .4 ,..1 . . .•V..."•,.1 . 4 .. , . .!,,•,• - . ' t2 areitjv. j-- . ; , , • t •,. i 1. Owl , AL. t. , . . . . • .„ - • . s ••.,', ..1.4.• , •..!...,suul•-,,i-,,: - ' •. -•., '•,-. .. . . -•:,•:•• '.• .:::,. .;. %I IP 1•;40-if '.''''..4Nr 1.4'''0,'••..'' : '''' '', ' ' 'rib: . . ' ''. .771 .‘ -.,4"1., . .•, . 4-71 . . l• -',,..,*:;'41,11.A',';;'.1.....",*s.•::4;'II.,:: i . .. i ' .. . 41:' ,.4 • ,.•1. 1 , ,, : iiit-4. 1 .. •••••.!, q••••i'.., • • 4. N. t . . .. ,.. • lat-viik, : ...4 „,,. •, k,,- - -...,,,-. ,- .- ..,,. .. . ' • .• ,,,,.. ;,,, 7,• b . . . 4 o'14,,, i t .• .. ' • -.4CASTM115,07,..- -).?N..1 , • .. . . ' ' . i L> 10 ‘''i 'tti'••••••' I•:-•:,'-''.•• I ''':•40..— 2..A..-..a.i.:..15.,,,;olfit,4,,... ifiti•;,_,‘,.1-‘1,1 •, • • , •..",-- .R.w.,..."4#01..:." "=.0,•_;_:_-.4.r-b-4--••A---.wifirliiir-5,-, ' .' . . . am • 1 '14::•:i .1- :. . , Wit-w•laz'''4,_•4910724.110.‘ 710-'.1P..'10v.Irir 7111;L-411:'lir. ,.., . 1 . • •I' . 41fra;'''':1\T"‘ 'I ''*f ' ;F:'• ' ••,•I''•,• • , ',.'" i 1, •'..• ''.-- i 1 . ' 1110ViP. '''''." 'ea . .; '. ,,' . . -.. . .' '• ' i 1,_Lis"•,;11).':, 4411"k ,r-...g • . . , • ''...-.."1, 4.1 j.,—...."-',. - . " •-, - .. , , i • - 5` . ,-;;I •,. • - • ' " ,:,;At....1.14 , .•--, . • • • - ' , . • I , I. .. , . ' . . , I. ' , ;:',.'"VAaw_'!".f,,Ig,I, „•, „ :..„ . ' . , . . ... . . 4 . ,--'• I':,..;',.f.111F.Vs.'.'1 ; I . ; rt. • III ,, . ... , • , ... , . ..• . . 4 t POWELL AVE '•,'--• '- - • ', ..• 1: . . . .. • ' . i. .. , • .. •., .. , . . . . ,• j i , '. ..:',:-,:.: • ',.' ' . ,. ';.: ...'i. . . ,. . ., ., ' . . . •, . .', . -• .., - . . . . • . , „ . , MD • ' - . e -1 , • ' . . .. . , ' .. . . „ 1 :r Ilrst City Equities • • :'''''"'"'''''', Pi. I '. .,•• .-BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK 1 • ' . -N.•,..,-, tilf flit Et , '.. -ADMAC . . r:11 .,. . „.. . Renton.Washington •-:-: . . • • t . ,i,. , ,.,,,t•:.(!•,•Wo',..,•3,,•• - - ..••:••-,-,,,- • - -• - , . • . . • • .. • . i ' 1 P I 11 i: ' • . P „ . —. V • • ' ' • . I •.1 I .1 . , ! • , •. I . . ,. . . . • . d . • . ' • ' , . • • I• • • • . . • • • . , I, I . . . . .. • . . ! • • . k. 1 • .\ , . I . SA—0 5 7—8 6, V-058-86 • .. . 1 ADMAC (FIRST CITY EQUITIES) . . • . • . . • , . ,. • . . . , . . . , . • • -- -- . \ • • ..- .-- p '` - - , . . 0.?•...,- --- . . .------—--- -t ..------.---'...------ i ------------.."------ . f i . r ,,•>--.---. .........1. • . /- 1 . ....-r. -.....-..... . •. . .------.. . 1 pHA$C-5..- — • t . ' e• PROPOSED NACHES AVE.SW—EXL---•-- is . • ___L__. 4 I .1 . . / • —: _ _____ ---j..: / . r . • > : I --I O . . • . . Z. •. 1 . . • • . . , -2 1 El . ; • . .1...0. 1.,.. 0c ..4 7C, • /. • • , Z ' I•1> . G 1 1 •Po '• i - t • ., m ' it si . s 1 2 _.,, • ! ''''. '''.. • li ''' I /' . ; • , . .. : i 5 .... ... . n o• " - i 4 •_..1=_, A :i i ,••(./, . . e -t,, 1. , • 'r•cirri ;., • . - nz : 1 . ; , rn_1 • --I N . — 1 • M 1 n I I . . -• g; X : •i 1 • • - 1 r......."......______ _ _ . > •_ _ .___1 . I 17- . ._) • . . . ___• .. ., • . . . i I i , • . . • • / , i . • . / . . • , . • : ,/, I . ) 1\k .. • • ii. \: / . k„,\ . . r, ,,,________/ ---.-------' P o /7/ o . ‘,' 4 ;,', 0 / 0 \ • ,- q ‘J; , , K 1/ 1 • > i - 1 §U \ -o . \..... . P. 141 ill ...„ ---\\:',..0.--- . . / .0 g / ---- - ....._.. -11111. k ------r 1/ . / .. . . . ----IT \-:\ ,....„.,_______Ill • . . . . . : . • , . • • . . _ . . . • . , NACHES AYE: SW. EXTENSION •---- , ---- ---: - ,,i,. .• • _ - f , ,BUSH,ROED&HITCHINGS,INC. pettA 'I ' :• . 13LN . 'ER .. . , ., - eii,....: . CIVIL ENGINEERS 8.LAND SURVEYORS •' T • — ,b- i '- r. il k 101•11MIND EOM AMOR ALA EAST SEATTLE M198102 _ BRH WON 323 4144 44,,r01°. . . im• ••........ . .. •..• r n.. . , y • SA••-057,-86 , • Vr058-86 - • . . ' . ' • ADPNNAC (FIRST; CITY :EQUITIES) e N a . $ N• .. d IIIIIIIIIII ' 'A . ' , • •.':r: [1111111. IIIIIIC 1=.1.11 ]I i . . —I u - _ r . -1 il 1 .. ` - i - ` `3 : lull LI_r [__. • .*.. i s ,-, . 7.—_---" — * ' . l• . l i1 .• ., ■'i■' . .■.r._ 1 .. ,.• . --1-1[ .I_ - ,■.■. i1 ,.. . .... ,..,, .■.■® i1 - II. . 1:11 �:::■ a. illlllllllll _`_ . - - _■.■. • 1 . s o 101 . =T_ . 11111 _ In 11111 . • - 3 • I- a w . w N. i i . ° •Fret City,Equities 1 BlackRiver: Corporate Park ``a 3 i i• , ADMAC'Building . N I S� Renton.,Was tnpton• , , a ` a .F. . .,.. ' REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVT.ST,ON : f'O i ( • (0Cp&G0). . /I17 . „. ID APPROVED ' . 1a )PROVEDWITH CONDITIONS ,_ . 0 NOT APPROVED . ' I: - /fi I //,/ eed454,44dee:A(10/i •__) ' ' • - 4.. - 4 ' . ' 61e41954e:/4 et. 00/4„,atp ' ) h11,1- 0 4 ' - e...d / ' 4rvi-tpe--,---ara.--V , - 94: • -.--- ( ' a /_a,- ,62)) dtz&*-7-e,)1,,, M _s .dp • a., "el 66‘044ece-e,,g-f---.12-oe . ,_ , .IN-kr -rn erezdt;‘,...4.- l' --4640 .„0„/".."--•i , , , , , ` 7Y' n/ DATE:- -71`11 g6, SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 -• - Form 182 • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/D.IVISION: ' r1-DC - APPROVED Ei APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Ii • • ( /. • . . , . • • � :�� ,-ter___ DATE: �• r1": SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ' . \ REVISION 5/1982 • Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /,-e aP. fl.APPROVED El APPROVED 'WITH CONDITIONS EINOT APPROVED ,. : / .47644 Cc/EA N-ge .SyeFpcE ,eE9 a/ +.Ep FuR /�/.eE !JA"P%. Al<c.ESS '. • . So//o9.e.o_s JV o T .l of ie a U 4C,o lox LWS E. . 3• �. h-/,ct6 NO 7-- At x a uu EP o A) E-i11 E ae4' E 'c y A c c Ess e 0 Ao. L/ p c'CESS Else-#►^ E Al T 421W p1 /C.eO 7 %moo a) E.0/. /9 cJ,L-. S• ex" 112 U-S7- ,Q E /.v "eve;M % / ...Q A ro 1017 •: ,47 /-/,ee ;7- ctf PccESS /2oA,oS ill 417 Q AE ALLA ZeJ 6p7-t1 E,C Cc. ,!'•—Ac EX, UJ/77'd P-5"401-7/ Co cue eere P,rioe. 7 F? '. ',, . REVIEW=ING''DEP:ARTMENT/DIVISI:ON : r=n..yems 'mac- • El APPROVEDI`:' E __!PROVED WITH CONDITIONS I.: NOT APPROVED V n-P-Q .(''-'13, - ohl/7' '''' X-. 1174c- 2-4-- C.,-,2,4L. c._ A,I_,;,L DATE: SIGNATURE 'OF DIRECTOR OR. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. ' ' ' . ' REVISION 8/1982 • i Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �vci�,f-cf-p .-. El APPROVED. APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS'- NOT APPROVED flc,,, -- ,e-,, j - fez..rum-~ ' . ifrz- ' >1-421 ' ,(112 )67,46-;- 1A,64-0,,ti, &lap'? • ,, ,,,j-,. .,/, ,,,,,.4.',i_ ad‘w_4:€;1,_,j )e- .e... '7tj6C2.- C /C/:.:Z;;9 I DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR. AUTHORIZED'.REPRESENTATIVE • REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : vT/I./T y lENp/V,E.'//Nh 0 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS - 0 NOT APPROVED ltf•}-0 fi�'s'o a:_ iil®1ECTTO• 5S 5 323 To Z?EY.E4 (AMA. # /;17/. SWIM easeesan 6AROH- ATER S sISOMlitaistittsfr CHARGE-SEWER ye :*' ,` 72 SPECIAL: _ AREA.CHARGE`-;WATER y 5 §r'O.a4(s..Q. Fr. X 3/5, /933 U= $/210�7 q SPECIAL A ESSMER`AREA.CHARGE-SEWER 'N ' APPROVER OATEN PLAN`. - .ES r , .ZS 2/_ • ti IPP�6V�Q SEWEA:PIA� = ..::'�-.`_ _VAS ; .. APrA06'EO FERE RIZ"S L0-Chil014' ' ;114* of' C l Qv/2E ° 4 A.1.0 1/104//Tt/: i. B1:FIRE Dr?:T ' 't ' /br" MAP s yow/Agr- AcG P/Ashs c 1 3 Els' • W PARS' h//Th' sego FT ' . \� ' OA/NAP . 1 (�.-- DATE: 7/��//1 /?U SIGNATU E `OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ': ; REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIV ON : flk /ELAPPROVED El APPROVED ;WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED • < /G7 e DATE: -7 - SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE . REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 c'easaTw•ew.as+�M:.a�awnsMW 1M9..tFIR[]RpF7R� Ciip{MK AltMertnICERAMIN t • , • • ! I tir,„ `:''1, • ' H , tr' . ir ,.W ,,,,.„ iggir4I.,.:,.,w.,‘.„t.•,..# , -,i' 0111q4 r1,., i eADF • ,,,...-„•,•,, CITY OF FIENTOM ,,, ...Y 1. 11 ____.) FIRST CITY/ • JUL 1 4 1986 SCHUMANBUI1 DENG/ZONING DEPT. July 14, 1986 Renton Environmental Review Committee ' CITY OR 'RENTON 200 Miii Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 . , Re. ADMAC Site Plan Approval and Naches AvenUe. Cul-de-sac Variance BLACKRIVER 'CORPORATE PARK , „ t Gentlemen: First City Developments Corp agrees to dedicate and construct the roadway for Naches Avenue from S.W. ' 7t1 Street to the temporary cu.1-de-sac to the north ' associated with the ADMAC building a4. q located to ' the east of Naches Avenue. (City' of Renton Land' Use No'S. S4.7057106 and ECF-050-86) We understand this letter' ' of ,concurrence is required prior to issuance of the . li Declaration, of Non-Significance,' by the . Environmental Review i Committee: ' , , , ' ' , ' ‘. ' .1,. Warm Regards, . , FIRST CITY/SCHUIviAN ' , IF -ve Barbara E. Moss . Director of Planning . . BEM/dip •,,-.,,if, _ , r , • ,• cc Art Hitchings Bob Roed . • . .,,,„,::,,,I0'..- Royce Berg . . ., . • .,I,,TS:' • ..-;, , t Gre4 BYler ' . . , .1..,1.0: 800 Fifth Avenue.Suite 4170•Seattle,WashIngton 98104•(206)624-9223 ' .., -•, ,-:-.0,...kt4,t4iv, t e . 1 • i I ' i o L ' 1198N • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-050-86 APPLICATION NO(s).! 'SA-057-86 V-058-86 a DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow` the construction of a two story building having 93,170 ;square feet for .office. manufacturing and • warehouse uses, and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. PROPONENT: First City Equities LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Black River Technology Park located on the east • side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department. The load agency for this amended. proposal has determined that It does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental Impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including: 1. Letter from First City/Schuman dated July 14, 1986 regarding the dedication and construction of Naches Avenue S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac to the north associated with the ADMAC Building on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton. WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal,this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than July 31. 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton. Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. a ' DATE OF DECISION: July 9, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: July 17. 1986 Ronald G. Nelson ._ Larry•M. Springer • , Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director • . ichard C. Houghton Public Works Director r, Architecture and Planniry ,• Lemon Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg A.I.A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 August 1, 1986 COURIER Mr. Roger Blaylock Planning Department City of Renton Renton, Washington 98055 Re: BlackRiver Corporate Park (Valley 405 Business Park) File No: SA 057-86 V 058-86 Dear Roger: f The following is the parking tabulation used for developing this phase of ADMAC. Function 1 S.F. Ratio Stalls Office 28,782 S.F. 1 200 144 Manufacturing 39,057 S.F. 1/1000 39 Warehouse/Storage 24,846 S.F. 1/1500 17 Deck/Entry Plaza 485 S.F. 0 0 Total 93,170 S.F. 200 Stalls Please note we are holding a number of these parking stalls in landscape areas preserved for future parking if ever required. ADMAC has projected a maximum number of parking stalls required at 158 stalls which is what is provided on this initial phase, with.44 additional stalls reserved in landscaping. Future expansion to the north will add additional facilities and parking to suit any changing needs. Respectfully, Roy eq. Berg Pre ident CiGb CT., r Cva"4, 4 Ti RAB:cpm PF,, 6 J \L ,- I `�� cc: Bill Griffiths, V.P. , ADMAC 3 AUG 1 1986 Barbara Moss, FCE , B Greg Byler, FCE , UILDING/ZONING DEPT. Elliott Severson, FCE OF 1? os } 'k, 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 9 �� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 -6b SEP1E��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR July 28, 1986 Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: Application for site plan review to allow the construction of a two story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses (SA-057-86) and a variance for a cul-de-sac over 500 feet (V-058-86); property located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. Dear Ms. Moss: The City of Renton Building and Zoning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 10, 1986. A public hearing before the City of Renton Land Use Hearing Examiner has been scheduled for August 5, 1986. The public hearing commences at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall. The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant, is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you before the hearing. If you have any questions, please call the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. Sincerely, 4.1 Roger 1 Blay ock Zoning Administrator RJB:JMM:ss 3008Z 2536Z NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING- RENTON HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON. WASHINGTON ON AUGUST 5, 1986, AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: PLAID PANTRY Application for conditional use permit to allow gas pumps in a B-1. Business Use, zone as part of a Plaid Pantry store. file CU-015-86; property located at the southwest corner of Union Avenue N.E. and N.E. Sunset Blvd. V FIRST CITY EQUITIES Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building having 93.170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses. file SA-057-86; and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet, file V-058-86. Property located on the east side of Neches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. Legal descriptions of the files noted above are on file in the Renton Building and Zoning V V Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 5, 1986. AT 9:00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED : July 25. 1986 Ronald G. Nelson Building and Zoning Director CERTIFICATION I. JEANETTE SAMEK-MC KAGUE, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES .ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for tt�e.State of Washington residing in £N1O _tip. on V the AT-ek day of July. 1986. 0'� e, 04212.L„ SIGNED _ 1% ' REN' 4 BUILDiING & ZONING DEPL''TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 050 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: STRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DF-SAC _ROAD I FNGTH OALFR &1U FEEL LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. TO : . . 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/9/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION ETRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT EPOLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; KAPPROVED El APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED DATE: -7-O2-2K SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 BEN' :d BUILDING & ZONING DEPI TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 050 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: STRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, P1ANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A _c I1F_Sli1 ROAD I FNGTH OVER 500 FFFT. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. TO : El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/9/86 El ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : El UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION ' ® FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT OBUILDING & WRIN6 DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT EI POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 2C-1-7)C APPROVED ® APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED (7/ /�%f� DATE: ,7 SIGNATURE-OE DIRECTOR OR AU`f I- ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE cr." REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT' 'I BUILDING & ZONING DEPP a 'MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 050 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: STRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, PIANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUE -DE-SAC ROAD 1 FNGTH OILER 5Il.0 FFFT. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. TO: . . . 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/9/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION flTRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : Ei UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU ® PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT El POLICE DEPARTMENT Ei POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT LI OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I9 D6gY ilai/61-07°MGA(7--- [II APPROVED El-All:PROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVEDe-2& ed 14de-7/4 4 /1° • (4) a 4- A, 4 e.d 4-, °-Cd9 Ile-le 4'Zol,teee--eA"--Ae-we 3)--qp A =74 ;� -, DATE: `j gb SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REN1 BUILDING & ZONING DEPP_'TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 050 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: STRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CIIL JIE-SAC ROAD LFN(TH 01LFR 5110 FFFL LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. TO: , E] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/9/86 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION El TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT ® POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P .M. ON THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : I El APPROVEDAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED — "4-1, &47/1-4A rdMii.e49 11(1)4A---142-- (AA1.07a 04041:41 Agkail 011,17 -44;"' Al-fre-/e er.,07/1„0.,/ G/;/ -37eXa.C., DATE : /rS SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 RENT""I BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT . J DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 050 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: STRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-Of-SAC ROAD I FN.CT__H 01LFR 500 FEEL LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/9/86 11 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG, DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 4UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION 1=1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P ,M, ON THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 1 (/ /4•/Ty v6v/'/E 2',(J El APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS a NOT APPROVED s SUBJECT TO .11 ENT-WATER No Wi .""•y lT-SEWER y.Es 5- 3.23 To Z)E .EI- l Aki $e/, �7/• �2 STSIfu$ ISPMEJIT CHARGE-WATER y,ES SYSIEM NEVEIAPMENT CHARGE-SEWER ,y,ES �Z SPECIAL T AREA CHARGE-WATER 4-5 00.611A7 FT. X 3/S /993 d= */2, 1D07 AS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER NO /Z (o.rl• 7a APPROVED WATER PLAN , ZS• �¢ APPROVED SEWER PLAN , QC1t, E O�/,Eie-¢},L,C vici //71/ APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS ,�6 n ,� BY FIRE DEPT. AZ ?, s, / ,4), 5 - 4 tobt),/✓GL6 phhsE5 �,`. G"°� F ,649C,e /V.F,e P4A"A l/1//mi SO. F7-6/.s w,e/n 7%.1 '/✓,-,4ct/ P ECE4 DN MA-P 7�j/ liii DATE; SIGNATU"E OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 REN1 4 BUILDING & ZONING DEPfyIMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 050 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: STRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DF-SAC ROAD LFNGTH OVER 5OO FFFT. LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/9/86 ® ENGINEERING DIVISION ® TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU LII PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ® BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /1=7.4ME -71EP T , APPROVED fl APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS LII"NOT APPROVED Z. Ld.L iJEn7/d-E,e .SyeAc a/it;,e Fv Fief . 3EP77 cESS .�. So//f,4,6•40s WO % AW/Z a U e cis E. 3• �i<9,2./r- ie4 /Vo 7- "( ( o w EP CA) ,E i�N EE4 E�/C1/ A c c Ess jZO AO L/ ACCEss �A�Es�►'+ EN7-- 'I'NF ��Am /4.earn faccl E.c�c f�c>.�. r. Gu ,, Us - , E. /A/ o,e 775 /die A,,., / ,9' 4,4 C /ACC ES S /20 AOs 4 c 7- a A-i Le.) E A 7 '1 E,e AC EO Ge.//Tip/ PSPAPV0Li-71 CO e •,e/o/e %a F? " ' N9. DATE: SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 �: ' Form 182 REN' � BUILDING & ZONING DEFT 'WENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 050 - 86 APPLICATION NO(S) : SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT : FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE : BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: STRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DF-SAC ROAD LFTIGTH Q7LFR SOO FFET_ LOCATION : LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NACHES AVENUE S.W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. TO : 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 7/9/86 4 ENGINEERING DIVISION Ej TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT El POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 :00 P .M. ON THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1986 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : eCf--21d APPROVED APPROVED n � WITH CONDITIONS ONOT APPROVED a--13/7 04"--7/24- 1- --. /1,-71,-e_ C.„_jg DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 Ems } 1198N CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO.: ECF-050-86 APPLICATION NO(s).: SA-057-86 V-058-86 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. PROPONENT: First City Equities LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Black River Technology Park located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department. The lead agency for this .amended proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information including: 1. Letter from First City/Schuman dated July 14. 1986 regarding the dedication and construction of Naches Avenue S.W. from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac to the north associated with the ADMAC Building on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055 Phone: 235-2550 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination in writing to Renton Hearing Examiner no later than July 31, 1986. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact City of Renton, Building and Zoning Department to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. DATE OF DECISION: July 9, 1986 PUBLICATION DATE: July 17, 1986 /Ronald G. Nelson Larry M. Springer Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director • 'chard C. Houghton Public Works Director /X VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S. I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: E(-CDI K)E EE I N- C-� \U DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 3, 1986 ECF - 050 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND Dp WAREHOUSEF USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DE-SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER LOCATION ET. Inr.ATFn nN THE FAST SIDE OF MANES AVFNJJE S_W AT THE son BIOCK. SITE AREA: 50 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 93,170 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air ✓ 3) Water // 4) Plants �✓ 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing �✓ 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 1/ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: gl DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: Cv Z� FORM l#14 REVISED 9/10/85 gN/IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Shc.a REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 96UACC �E=JP I' • DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 3, 1986 ECF - 050 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DE-SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER AEET. LOC TIO i nrATFn nN TNF FACT �TnF nF pFS AVENI!E C W AT THE 5nn RI Of K_ SITE AREA: 50 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 93,170 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: /77"2 d ew as 144 � ax: phis 0,2e 71-`,6 r %/7V 4cc, // �CcG:�> 1.71o4A., fE.J j74/1`A' 77j ce-- . I RECOMMENDATION: P DNS U MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED B1Z:, /67 C/_:2; % TITLE: DATE: / '� FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: c-7-" U(1N L_Ce 1‹57- DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 3, 1986 ECF - 050 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSEF USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DE-SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER LOCA�Dp IONEET. In(ATFn Oft THE FAST SIDE OF NACHFS AVFNUE S.W_ AT THE son BIOCK_ SITE AREA: 50 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 93,170 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 4 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: DNS ri MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY:( / '// ter TITLE: SS/Sr �� !�1 eI� L/ DATE: -7/7/e FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sru 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 (L �TT"K: PNC•Th • h N • DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 3. 1986 ECF - 050 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND5 WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DE-SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER LOCAlIDp O ET' InWATFn ON THE FAST SIDE OF NACHFC_.AVENUE S_W. AT THE 5O0 MOCK. SITE AREA: 50 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 93,170 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare �✓ 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 4.--' 16) Utilities COMMENTS: cargava "Pr S*7'44 lri;4ge.. .511r01 72.0 /1-w-44_ RECOMMENDATION: DNS CJ MITIGATED DNS J EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: :7;5.- /J Q z3 A4: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 --VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S.._J. i, Renton Fim Dent Fire Prevention BureaS )17 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1 `�� J ma`s'C �� . ► DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 3, 1986 ECF - 050 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-05F * s56, PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES *' ^^ PROJECT TITLE: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DE-SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER LOCATO ET' InrATFn ON THE FAST SIDE OF NArHES AVENUE S_W_ AT THE 500 MOCK. SITE AREA: 50 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 93,170 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light- and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities c/ COMMENTS: 7644./ Qa .-i ( J Luc ate - K Gfi J�� . "/"';'7 • RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: �' � TITLE: -J C/z.;_ , Y� a/c-a-c DATE: ,Ce.44..A___ a?5, /91e FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: UkT1 L;l I Ch� (NI V - DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 1986 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 3, 1986 ECF - 050 _ 86 APPLICATION NO s . SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND Dp WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DE-SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER LOCATIO ET' InurFn ON THE EAcT SIDE OF NACHFS AVFNUE SAW_ AT THE 500 RIOCK_ SITE AREA: 50 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 93,170 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare , 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: A Ci1 1,\ .e\• RECOMMENDATION: DNS D MITIGATED DNS 1 EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: UT/4/7y ,Eiv6//vEE.e'/N60 DATE: if /70 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 /2 riVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW 5 ;LT REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (P) l}. I U DATE CIRCULATED: JUNE 24, 1986 1 COMMENTS DUE: JULY 3. 1986 ECF - 050 _ 86 APPLICATION NO(s). SITE PLAN APPROVAL, VARIANCE: SA-057-86, V-058-86 PROPONENT: FIRST CITY EQUITIES PROJECT TITLE: BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CON- STRUCTION OF A TWO STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND Dp WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DE-SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER LOCH IOET' IOcATFn nN THE EAST SIDE OF NACUFS_AVENUE S_W_ AT THE son RIOCK" SITE AREA: 50 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): 93,170 SQUARE FEET IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation /14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: RECOMMENDATION: ,-;) DNS Q MITIGATED DNS ri EIS / REVIEWED BY: TITLE: DATE: FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 OF keA s v,.4 ' �� ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT %40kop, RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR 0 - 1 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 co- co-091 1'F4 SErre‘# BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June 27, 1986 Barbara Moss • First City Developments Corporation 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle. Washington 98104 SUBJECT: ADMAC BUILDING FILE: SA-05 -86 v- oft-ha Dear Ms. Moss: The staff of the Building and Zoning Department have done a preliminary review of the above referenced site plan approval application. In order.for us to proceed in a timely manner. it will be necessary for your firm to supply to the Building and Zoning • Department the following item: Provide first class stamps and mailing addresses for all adjacent property owners so that we may notify them of the pending site plan approval application. This is a requirement of the City's new site plan approval ordinance and is required of all applications that go to the Hearing Examiner or are done administratively. Please also fill out the attached certification of notification form disclosing who the adjacent property owners are and have it notarized and return it along with the stamps and labels to this office at your earliest convenience. Sincerely. -----q31-10),e-9t4 `'J (lert• Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:JFL:ss 2499Z Attachment Architecture and Planning PPNohwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg AIA.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728 5 TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Renton DATE: June 27, 1986 Department of Zoning 200 Mill Avenue South PROJECT: BlackRiver Corporate Park Renton, WA ADMAC PROJECT NO: NW 86007 ATTN: Ms. Jeanette Samek-McKague RE: Site Approval Plan NUMBER DESCRIPTION 4 Sets Site Approval Plans; revision date 6/27/86 Site Plans A-1 Landscape Plan L-1 Building Elevation A-2 4 Copies 11 x 17 Conceptual Master Plan 4 Copies Parcel "C" Plat Plan and Legal Description REMARKS: RP-cuhmittal fnr Site Apprnval main 0 V ENTON 0 ca, v Hand Del ivered ;.i;1 y .',' BY: Y. Ken K. Chin BUILDING NG /ZONING DEPT. cc. OF J A � 410 0 ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT - r o RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR O,A co� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 0 SEP1,140 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MEMORANDUM MAYOR �PtD`chPcC� (T'►tom c - 0r'D`1 -$f,Q ,V-p545-eat.k) \ 1a.G�- fl - L ?IL-0 LTTOYt1L . 5=4.P `ID 1240q C., `.1I1�= 'PAL v�ps(, •. �� -Ec„wrc Wv41,1/49-nIzAn �tke 1---b 13tc.. rent P rt.c tom- C� of (wkInc" PrzcScxC .D Pc'PQ orb 84. Pbestx per Q s A.„6.A.;..t1:fv‘J. .X S ('& -,v�f�, _e1�s�-� v►q Er1nV $ vtLC E L, &I, t.s l lli h�t,C� �a-dG 2492Z NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A SITE PLAN APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE BUILDING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT. THE FOLLOWING BRIEFLY DESCRIBES THE APPLICATION AND THE NECESSARY PUBLIC APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two-story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet. GENERAL LOCATION: Located on the east side of Naches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. PUBLIC APPROVALS: 1) Site Plan Approval 2) Variance 3) Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Building and Zoning Department located on the third floor of City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to public hearings and during public hearings. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Building and Zoning Department at 235-2550. --- - - N0S-ri-1 4 FAHI,j 1 . j�E 5vE s.ri. _ .\ • //,3�L N � //i, i A// VARIANCE ./j • SITE LOCATION __ / i KING COUNT`I __ l / vuMv SroYia.l • r TObE 7.1;7 ISUMMEd2 'g(o. 4 _W U d I"4 .--- .`...._. ....... ...........,..._....:.....,.....,,,,.„ Q 1 51. H LIP 352 • N • Q S > tY N j Q N N I:` METRO J � d 3 0 h DISPOSAL Q q.a F O w ,--- d /° o vJP- CrK n9{ I - 405 i 7 I • , h %\) ',..4 \ .. , `\``. Ana w 1874122 CF. ▪e SSS.1 ; \\\ Rm+uo woo c3roa e317o sg. ia7 2 SF. ` 1 ; ,`\\, Cowan. FaolRN169E.00z ..,..,,..._,....,,. .<�_�_..,....�.�<..,',,, ' \`.\\\ Compact P.]khry 18 ..1cs._,•ino_o_A•<-.-n < i. '/ t. Total Porting 202 <..a�...,<-..... ,... ; qq� u u. a •\ 1 �. -eo.ae.aa y'� ° W.1:Z1 . ▪.,.41.1%:,� :',1.4 „tea \\ \ \gib :10,-k.• . s• 0 . 111 . .�' Future Phase 0 \. mO.�, ,_. .,., 1 v ....—.....e..ono.,>..,... ., L \ r..' 0\' \ -V • • f. LEGAL DESCRIPTION A. Iillliliji„u ' iilli!il ( I,J1111111111,1i ' : %? : ' I ' ! 1,.U1111111111„1 � : _1_... �; Phase I 1 I , `•� b _�40S .t.„A Ipfl4 I zob i z• w. 4. iI , I I � I I I i , ,, I^ .w.a,>, v'w . '' c 'Y n• fY..71 Dzscnww `4 [ .,. ..._-1. w� _ .11 e f S [C8 --- : q N ' fad ` 1 o ; 1' I ADMAC Bu h g , Mill ! - ; VICINITY MAP No stye : I _ • oEC z t , la �i,'.•o. VN ' t _ram rn� I.. ""'"° �� ,•ue_J` . �T ,�.,�p__ taM:erpo Ro.ev� — --- r,.•ur�x+v 'ni . i fivss is G!T74::r+, C F.t o Pa,tk s -- o ,+on's Y�s'oo'w-/_ f S faa sral I 1 " —,,.e rc_-4-if- I+'rxww,,,,;„,�i .. t --u+vsete F*�trl - . ;:: :,.. :- L. al I I i - --��:eC ad cu col Y L Q.y o - ----^`De° r.....-•.._ _— - tj--;.:;:: W SffE PLAN �.a,,.i. r� F ` tapQsecpa M1 — ,;" - /� ai Landocope wo_a2 ! I • I r� --- _ �f/�. c -- - -- a mo,__ a. •-wave -.ov .✓'. 10' . • - �� 110007 Derr e°OFI ,.1, �1l_ .� L ) I I me• �a-9aa t cw'.•✓ A°1 SITE PLAN 1/301 .. �cwt.. OF 14'. POSTED 6-25-86 ( : ) . gTep SEPIt' OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : SA-057-86, V-058-86 APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY BUILDING HAVING 93,170 SQUARE FEET FOR OFFICE, MANUFACTURING AND WAREHOUSE USES, AND VARIANCE APPLICATION TO ALLOW A CUL-DE-SAC ROAD LENGTH OVER 500 FEET. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF .NACHES AVENUE S .W. AT THE 500 BLOCK. PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : 1. ) SITE PLAN APPROVAL 2. ) VARIANCE 3 . ) BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. ***** COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL 7-9-86, 5: 00 P.M. ***** FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION , � . a ITY OF RENT( - 1-, FILE NO(S): i �C�-7-�(0 C.)0 BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT = " 0 . .,,,r,c) MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those item related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATIONI NAME FEES First City Equities Q REZONE*(FROM TO ) ADDRESS 800 Fifth Avenue,: Suite 4170 SPECIAL PERMIT* Q TEMPORARY PERMIT* CITY Seattle, Washington ZIP 98104 CD CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* in TELEPHONE n SITE PLAN APPROVAL (206) 624-9223 Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q VARIANCE From Section: * Justification Required NAME Barbara E. Moss (Director of. Planning) ADDRESS SUBDIVISIONS: 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Q SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, Washington 98104 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE Q FINAL PLAT (206) 624-9223 Q WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: - First City Equities i ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 800 Fifth Avenue, Sutie 4170 Q PRELIMINARY CITY Seattle, Washington 98104 0 FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE (206) 624-9223 Q Residential Q Industrial I L Q Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS (to be assigned) ± 600' N. Ea of S.W. 7th on Natches Avenue. TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY Vacant MP FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Office and Manufatur:ing_.Faci.lities NUMBER OF SPACES: ® ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE _ SQ. FT. ACRES 4 AREA: CITY E0 �� 4.3 TOTAL FEES :Do r t,� 1 t1 �" ,I`Lym 44'4'i-v 7:,4 `ti ' ::'^ FF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING 11O 9 ? r , APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: �-.2.EQh.Q L ZvonQ,I�.- ` e-K.4•I 11UN " '' 1936 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: B`!;Lr.ING/LJf..Nv DEPT. Q Accepted U Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: (0 .- 2,4 '-&) Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: ®l Building El Design Eng. La Fire !1Parks El Police qPolicy Dev. Ekraffic Eng. Ea Utilities ,...----.. r REVTRP.II l—'21_o n •.- Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). ( See Attached) AFFIDAVIT ,DU/o M' SGUM /V , being duly sworn, declare that I am EDauthorized representative to act for the property owner,=Owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS (0 DAY OF 4-1-42e..-- 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT .9/4 (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) (Address) 936y (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) 62-9zz3 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." ,Form #174 Architecture and Planning PnPomeroY Northwest,Inc.Royce A Berg A.I,A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 V-c6g`6b TRANSMITTAL TO: Ms. Jeanette Samek-McKague DATE: July 1, 1986 City of Renton Department of Zoning PROJECT: ADMAC 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PROJECT NO: NW 86007 ATT N: RE: Adjacent Property Owner List NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 Certification of Notification of Adjacent Property Owners/ Site Plan with Addressed Postage Paid Envelope. REMARKS: For Site Approval Process. Under Separate Cover. HAND DELIVERED BY: Y. Ken K. Chin cc. Barbara Moss, Transmittal Only Greg Byler, Transmittal Only r _ CCTV V OF RE TORS i.J \VI CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPER ? } oWNERS/INAIA BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * PROJECT TITLE: ADMAC BUILDING APPLICANT: FIRST CITY EQUITES' APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-057-86, V-058-86 The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to • site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER C & P S Railway Company (Not Avalible from #132303902-01 King County Assessor) Contact: Burlington Northern Railroad 2100 - First Interstate Center 999 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 ti ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • CERTIFICATION ',Y. Ken K. Chin , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on the k day of V 1 \ SIGNED: • = CERTIFICATION OF MAILING i;. • hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan app-roval were mailed on . to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary.Public. in and for the State of Washington residing at on the day of SIGNED: FORM 2OB 1199N NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a declaration of non-significance for the following projects with additional conditions imposed as mitigating measures under their authority of Section 4-2822(D) of the Renton Municipal Code: FIRST CITY EQUITIES (ECF-050-86) Application for site plan approval to allow the construction of a two story building having 93,170 square feet for office, manufacturing and warehouse uses, file SA-057-86, and variance application to allow a cul-de-sac road length over 500 feet, file V-058-86. Property located on the east side of Neches Avenue S.W. at the 500 block. Further information regarding this action is available in the Building and Zoning Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Renton Hearing Examiner by July 31, 1986. Published: July 17, 1986 -cp ri , ",,, CITY OF RENTON,___ - Ti FIRST CITY/ R JUL 141986 SCHUMANLEI!DING/ZONING DEPT. July 14, 1986 Renton Environmental Review Committee CITY OR RENTON 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 Re: ADMAC Site Plan Approval and Naches Avenue Cul-de-sac Variance BLACKRIVER CORPORATE PARK Gentlemen: First City Developments Corp agrees to dedicate and construct the roadway for Naches Avenue from S.W. 7th Street to the temporary cul-de-sac to the north associated with the ADMAC building site located to the east of Naches Avenue. (City of Renton Land Use No' s. SA-057-86 and ECF-050-86) We understand this letter of concurrence is required prior to issuance of the Declaration of Non-Significance by the Environmental Review Committee. Warm Regards, FIRST'tlitedlit. Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM/dlp cc: Art Hitchings Bob Roed Royce Berg Greg Byler 800 Fifth Avenue•Suite 4170•Seattle,Washington 98104•(206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments • ' Y• I [TY OF RENTO FILE NO(S): � e �� - � -SG, � belL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT -dam-�� , m • �- -MCP �� MASTER APPLI CATION • NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those_ • items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. ! Attach additional sheets if necessary.) FR.O.M., APPLICANT TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME FEES First City Developments Corp . , as INomine& , 0 (FROM TO ) ADDRESS 800 Fifth Avenue Suite- 4170 0 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP CD TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle , WA 98104 ©:i •COMDITIONAL USE PERMIT* TELEPHONE D SITE PLAN APPROVAL SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL • 624-9223 • No. of Cubic Yards: . , VARIANCE* $15 0 . o 0 CONTACT PERSON . From Section: 9-,/008- 7 k NAME * Justification Required 4' 1 Barbara Moss ADDRESS ' I SUBDIVISIONS: • • 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Q SHORT PLAT CITY • _ ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle ,. WA 98104 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE _ Q FINAL PLAT 624-9223 CD WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME PLAT NAME: First City Developments Corp. , as Nomi e ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Q PRELIMINARY CITY • ZIP FINAL Seattle , WA 98104 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 6 2 4-9 2 2 3 0 Residential Q Industrial UCommercial Q Mixed V LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: ' PROPERTY ADDRESS S 1 Sec 13 Twp 2 3N Rg 4E, W.M. TENTATIVE EXIST- NG USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY FINAL Vacant '. MP PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: Office Park ' NUMBER OF SPACES: ' 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES _ TOTAL FEES $15 0 . 0 0 1 AREA: 2 ,178 , 000 50 I art 0I" Re,'lulr� `i AFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING C� i' A�INl ', � v rin L APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ��¢� -' �Y� E. I APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: -�-` JUN 101986 �._._.. .. QAccepted p„ ; r 4 Cl Incomplete Notification Sent On . . '•: By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED • ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: / APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: O`� CD Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: ., ,. • (Initials) ROUTED TO:r ..,\ Building s Design Eng.hi \ Fire Parks ,i\Police ,V.2kPolicy Dev. Efl.,Traffic Eng. ® Utilities REVISED 1-31-PA Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). AFFIDAVIT 1, D/a/D M, 6cgoitm-I , being duly sworn, declare that I am F.IP!!thnri7ed rfpreser+tatl:!e to act for the property,o,r'r r,Mowner of thc, property ir,v !ved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS DAY . OF , 19� NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT aff.„),ve2 • 0 / // (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) � • L� 800 Fifth Avenue , Suite 4170 Jiro (Address) ' X (Address) Seattle , WA 98104 (City) (State) (Zip) (206) 624-9223 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 Architecture and Planning Lam: ' Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc..Royce A.Berg A.I.A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 ADMAC, INC. FIRST CITY EQUITIES Design Intent Design and build a manufacturing, office, research and development facility for ADMAC on a section of property adjacent to Powell Avenue and Natches Avenue in BlackRiver Corporate Park (Valley 405 Business Park) in Renton, Washington. Natches Avenue is to be extended an additional 800 feet and ultimately all the way through to the north, west and back to Oakesdale Road (Monster Road). Phase One development is proposed with additional land being reserved for . possible expansion of parking and building to the north. The building is sited with a large landscaped buffer to the south which is placed in a landscape preserve and provides additional future parking if ever required. In addition to this area, there is an additional 50 feet of landscape area where significant trees are to be preserved and grading and drainage will integrate with the drainage easement to the south also owned by First City Equities. This landscape area will provide links with other landscape areas within the total Master Plan concept for this BlackRiver Corporate Park, incorporating trails, bench seating areas, and amenities for employees and area workers to use. The buildings are designed of painted concrete panels with articulated reveals to reduce the apparent scale of the buildings. The use of reflective glass and tinted glass will provide accents and reflect the trees to be preserved. Outdoor patio and luncheon areas are provided for employee use and tie into paths with access to the total development of BlackRiver Corporate Park. Outdoor lighting will be accomplished with pole mounted fixtures, lights facing down with control on the light patterns to prevent glare. Surface mounted wall pack lights will be used on the north side of the building to illuminate the service areas and parking next to the building. Lights will also have cut—offs to prevent glare on properties to the north. CITY of RENTON RF) [75' \11 • u J U N 10 1g8 'T..:. BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. '_•-moo- --0-°iB-S3 -. ��--1F• -,, • _. .... . . .„. • . , .. . .. . . . , .. ., _ . • . _. .. . , , ..., .. . . . .. • . ., . ..... .. . • . .. ., . , . . . • . . • . ..., . , .. , , . . . , • • • ,_-,,,i,_4,‘,,„.. 41. ; •,• : . '• • .,4.,••,4,;-, S Jj1 rta�rir� � • • f )� ►} • t { ,- t{i1i "' ".x!": + y.1Jr.. rfa'p-Iily]'` iei. �4%1'.• ; 'o'.la. -fr ,„x; 1. 111 • � ��•, Fr >•� f - �,. • r •• :if j ;,. iV+ ,� it ',lids ¢` „fill ] 74� 'Y 4 • q . S «* t Te• • } '4t� d off' t'( 1 doI;e^A4 8 '-?^fi �4 2t. 1 2� i + r, •rt ,js . 7 fy 'nr' 2 { , t f,s. v 4 r c tv r r ; v ti' f it:: , a { r?{ ' r ' s y ey 1 1 i, y 1[�'i[ 1y F T Cl� ,><i„�'~� r , •.• P 0 i j Qr i�{{,� r {•'J. ., � F '`•tt A� ' i' tf LR�,jr r 1 1 • • • er $ • � • ifx - s f•t t ?:! IF y Ct'i l:`y, ; • r } ;,r1 e.Y Z F • II ,• K. •( •' 'r T; +�,y45,,. sF iir. y, �i 7•''1'1 f ',+ i a >y. 1 �. i+ , {r r.• • • +ir1 •P -� n Y'a , i 2' rce YI r. % <��'�S' Y / i R i t1 �. 'fe A r r t. T�`', 2,t. y�� {:q� t � C_. y 4 t iU 7 , -)- •'� -'FS b .. 1 p ( 't`. _ i ut� 1 �Li'1 '-11} rail 6..4I, :' ',. c,'i . +f fi k , j,#" 1>i, t r ' 4 ! . ,{ ,a :.;Y.if�r,1if 1"r �' * t5 °s .U1 4�jJ {;Z i ?{' 9 ,.. ti F 'y •s :i ,i 'Yt- ;" '�g 4 �..J.6•, f• e:l'y�i f` $]'• ,.• [S} :0., ;real.. x , N, y.° yi t , ["�P )4'1 • , M �. ';i i .' t�R'• 4 q i?,:, .fix. : i,,: • [ �.:v'i �y�X,{(�'((""7"4Kj+ •j,i 1.li J 1.3.4(8t I ;•1 : • t. S A 'Y 11 'La`-f `e*,.' tfY�'.ty. '. �'[ ,'(f,4d! � >r rn N.y17* 'r 1 ii q• [ C P �� :1 ,1 �3Y }4 i•lit R'.! C• :n',.�""- i7�� 4.. 'y) 1�ar tf'f. r�jt y�F7. a�r" �. 11 .� • • , +;•ii St��• . r ��,,,t' � ''S•t rr L °,.F S` ly' 'D,11, ?"' 'a. � ,, Jt ti ,rrl ,.iq ti r r' r?'.[F.f 'y d+Y r 1} �is ,�,{ c{=-" .-..di: rt �' %. y ,I. ,"t ,� s t P 4•..•4 i,� r W.AYr["v iY T"•I;�:-y�,"..7ib S- f ,-fttr ..70,1 :�tki,�1 +,:•r;ti 1 S 5. vt-, +. j y '[�". Fa y}..f ,n� �-y., ! T r,2, 3.ir.ti�7V:L S+p,. + .Ir-..,. .4, t 1'*lr rJ Vt .'V - f I S� 1.,,e : t f f �7 ,mod."...,{ 1,, ab:;=i,, da .,�M, a' t 0, W..; t u: • y' [.i, ,S ri i 1.' y ••. ': y ;. yy,, 111 i 1 ,- v...:. t �YQ, . s,'ir,_�l+; _.1•.•.,',1•'•^,(<'rixy4�� R"`.y�a4{Ewe. �y'Y, }`A'-�., , �V�,��,��t� +� �f.:'. • •• • t t•1 i.1 - t� Y j, 1 l 1�y ya f� &. ,aa '�, 'tty' 4 f•r t f' 1f Y � t r 7t t • r Xrd a`'y : r `t i 1. 's .4'�'SL 2g � r 4t i r+ 2r ' ' ` rl h • _ + •l of .s-., b �� .rF,,A 1 k --[ 1 - 1 ♦.41',,;. •Y • ,I,' • • 2 r ! t� t,L� ij. !. 'Y r Sr-' 1 Ir-y., f T, ip„,.,� r 4- -1 ."' ; 1 ± ! i.`e II'r 's. ) . •t4iyt Y. 4 C•d tr4,y 4p , ° il: 'r. � ,u,�7 "A�y - Pl 42 s I , .t .,r;; J#t ';j �t a 9'. ,f-,r f?34:.+•.'.�ti G' h- 1 ' Y l' `'�k '�.� ti. . + .] w !fF • t 1 o f 1,1 jt,},yjti. M r S pY 'Y xl •); y i Ci £ 'Y'y[�r• 4,r i S � l �F-}'.s r tt � i�S ,a• J •�f • , ti• f, p� t: C ', a + � •� •��1 + iit 51• +' S, 1 ii i.j,. u •1 fx.t +` S ,d, )• • a a. 1 [m h 3•r } ��y. ."'� 't r`Pr • f :'K:1• �' y'3fi 1 S; at f, y!* r ss, y ' ynir fir, �1q, r YAv'Y ,:_; .A �.[ ' , r it 4 it i' X , , , , Ft- Fad ,•r „i .i ' w v 4 (1(�F.>fi a i9 r' y�asy , ,,1'4- ".V «"'Y'4; Y 1. .`1ry+y r• }•,t ` �. "i '; ', + � ' R{Y�}1.7�vw r I i � 15{ Aj ' Y r 31 1 iS Its q.3 ? { i o1S��'r 4 ' S4: srTe' }� �• i tip¢":.va l.i, �, '+1 nt Y t ro ., aF . �Y } 1rf �'9 k�w a F +'t r, f "� 7: *V! .,4 1�` N{6-1�6 • .,t -.`' +. 'a" ,'r 1'i;.t r§ i` • r • ..•• y by , 1 - .alr iL�J • ri ''' f{,yq,", .,4 .y I. . �k F 4 a.1 ;' ii :j .iJ• ti i,Y`J,, �., 'L, } I: t � yr ! y.�'' f • •r t. J .rtMr Y+;, ,..tdr,�:, •'t ,''�'..,, a;;�'."F bray' 'S,y 2r� ,.'. *.j..+c�9� A)'%0,, ':7 :�1i$5 a'ti.' .;.Y.yi}+f#k y t i' i ,. 3 1. ,•' IfY 1,�•T c i y v } rt:y5:,I. 5i'I r.Z n e.5 ;,...; ' .g X.. +. , ..ccr. •J _ , °:p. ;b,• p ti f y J ,ith..',{ r ^,r.41 ,•34, ad y .:S1. ': 5f;rj' •�,�s y �;�,.� '}' y�'& 'fx7'I4+<� ll t�. r �[ .s 1';o- �1•�,r�t J�:+.y �` If 'J. H�;ti .� •� , .�}}i..° e •�,; 't�., ;?.:':�,'s„ +k(ap'^fir r,..irA° .f7• wt >r �*r}#�' ttir� r r '�^•+� �. KK 4t+ h..�t' a•' +' ,3t`�' S.'�;a 1r ,. ,'SI? '»,, s.,,',t°'+_-iiilfJs,,,, 5t;i':.1,+` •6"3: V. ay t.yf ff`!;, "� •i f+t :1, yr • i €..rL,r ri,ly:,,...h �'."' I:.,,u., .g '} 5. 4.E+7°'i, *°f;;.rt.y.':t•.,f.', v.,.,�_.*.'.ei.`:,,,,•3:% :., •`''[•,f';: 't: ,, 74.,,.j.,r. Rranv ',» .x jI ,. .i ;A2 ,• r ,B - kr 7r -„, �L,, ( _ yew r• rSy,1✓• L y' � �'1 •�: � � i 1� � a.y';, �i'��;�ryJ� '.`+�p,¢,n'tr. •�. y'4, 9.:',1t..y h4.•:; t..'ID .,<I,, 1,•4.,i f "��f. �44 �,11_ j Au •yi.. 5 t r a • Y ^ • r f t, .4*-.. F� J{�{.4't.•'`'t'. /►y v ,-7N';( 4t. N � h �� L t� /;'' #fIp, F.s, µ:y .1 f-'If. 1 7 ,f, .,.�'• :!•1 K #iEiY l.,,�� /�1X'+ '�,t''p?t,Jk J +# +tr '¢,,.1 .!+)f� Spy n ' y,-uv +� ■ , T 4« Y ste7`r '.Y i � "i r R 5 5.. Y 1• •.e 1. �"`�y_'�1; +.� >..� { �'A" :;'� i'4• %p. _[ . fir,, Y'+• rXr�' a * t q } d,�4>f ',1 i fry �y ., �fi, s:- ,y�1€ k �' ,• 1 i* t! 1 Y� gi l q t 4' Y .•: + K ``,L..,� rr•ti _ - _ SJ�?!<.•St�+r u, i,! Y t,i,1! rPL x r A t :.J3` , . -.. .:►`e•v .''{ z -ram '; r 1, 1y� �t x.., CK+ 1 � v S .' � ' +.a r. � i .r.at k�: d�� q f i- �,F r f ;J a t �_,: r+�d r e M"i '' i S + „• U n tLy4 e} vv kt { e " r y.,r UiT � , '.. f" _•.7 "'` :tS!1Fay�-4 7 a �1+ ° ,r.«y , gg•-4.tR Mi� l, f>,�li i� s^ r r..: ).:',.•,• ,,, •,..1 A5.4•'• ...ma, . ca , . . 4,-4- al‘allii-ep.','V.,,..1.,!'',''.. •"..,.'.. 1• I 4 4, l ., '...'•,.'; • 1CrFfy• ® w ° •tit {v c ; ¢. ,y, r ; g,. i${*, ,.,L t,Y y'etM' 4, s ', r'A �.1-- ?-.6.. ^,'�1 JA.: e i t• - � �11f ., st a - is.wl' j <• agolp • .c {. •'' ,`1R ;:'.tit 4'' 'wy� :rY jo- . ,.>, !, -�. t�F � �t + k � ' Q"` . J [..it y •7e• *0,�i'.� T� 1• f "-• • ,�4,;, I1� jr.i :"I t 4 an t . •'i'k r+^ �f ' d I DI kI V r� ! y ii y _ :.,.t• .t Q j'F`' ri i' ', i ',7 ti[,f+•.'', F�; 11 • • 1I + 4 f•F r.,, o ..i ; JK' S.}`sra, ' r " ,r.:3ny r.,, ,i a, b• '} .ig-4•ir t.-.' ,, 1 ,. F t �"{ 1t.= . 4: .. Y s ai F`i'+y" t •4 :t Y i ,1,'T . 4 f t , f ;. + [.. �• :j .•,.J p rJ' f'".xt ''i •� �� xR•'+'� t * '.`�i'� , .� f�• [..... } r i 7i, a s n ,:�}, i �Y j'��'''S-r! 4r: Y,i r'., ,Y7 0 ) �' .•;S--- 'r 4 • i. is �., 1 'kr� 1 J a 1.1 .� �)-1�-':�� f`� 9. S)F'7• I •f( 7 [-�1 1' i"{ S 1 �A i , i. M., �A (� '_�3 "'iv��'��1 y '?7'! �`�[ �t,4 mac,[ j n J. r�,i'� 't'' ;'l�,}�•YLk + ' C 4 i r {` r - 1 ,[ !r y s 1,+•,.9� .� �•t ,=d:��c � �;- h ,;�,�s, [ rr 1 t }+ . Ga y ca• f + ,y r +tit r 4' ..t ir•' "{v 1•!t "' y 1 ' r Cn4;ig'.c A tri' i ;`y.Yi It w s Jfl a ,}y• ^ r s `:' y. .jp *t, ?y 4 s z j • •• 3 • t'r � :� "r )`i Ak,I�f '1 ."45�.1 ' I • • • - [ i 1 * = i44 ,3•'• t }v' �r. ...•ep, tr y ilk �•E• 1 n, `.,.':. f •_ 4�• t • • •} r �'� i i r1Nkle5. X Irr ( Q... . - • :. , £ ji c I' , f FIRST CITY/ June 6, 1986 SCHUMAN UN Or WINTON Mr. Fred Kaufman I g IE Hearing Examiner tt CITY OF RENTON JUN 1 Q i e = 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 BUILDING/ZONING o 'o Re: Naches Cul-de-sac Variance BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK Dear Mr. Kaufman, FCDC is requesting a variance to the existing land use code in order to build a temporary cul-de-sac for Naches Avenue within the Black River Technology Park property. The ultimate design of Naches Avenue will extend the roadway through the Black River property and connect with the future Oakesdale Avenue on the western boundary of the Black River Technology Park property. This design has been conceptually reviewed and approved by Mr. Jim Gray, an inspector in the Renton Fire Department, with Public Works Department, the Building Department, and King County, as the road would cross their property at its access point with Oakesdale. All agencies contacted have supported our design concept. As an interim construction phase, we wish to pre-improve the first 800 ' of the roadway in order to access the ADMAC property. The temporary cul-de-sac we wish to build at this time, is being done only as a phasing of the ultimate roadway. Adequate fire circulation will be provided by access from Powell Avenue into the ADMAC property, creating a loop with Naches Avenue. The previous owners of the property had designed 2500 ' a cul-de-sac for Naches Avenue as a permanent design, never intending for the road to extend through to Oakesdale Avenue. They received approval of the necessary variance for that design through the Hearing Examiner' s office (V-091-84) . We are working with Bob Bergstrom of the Public Works Department to design an appropriate connection to Oakesdale with a bridge which must cross the P-1 channel. That design must be coordinated with design of the future bridge crossing the railroad tracks further west of our property. Since that bridge has not been designed by the City at this time, Bob Bergstrom 800 Fifth Avenue Suite 4170 Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)624-9223 Real Estate Development and Investments +Mr. Fred Kaufman ' June 6, 1986 Page Two feels we should wait to design and build the bridge crossing the P-1 channel (over to Oakesdale) in conjunction with design of his bridge crossing the railroad tracks. Because of these special circumstances, it would not be possible for us to develop the property at this time if we were required to improve the roadway all the way through to Oakesdale. Additionally, the design of the Oakesdale L.I.D. at this time is in its beginning phases. Connection to that roadway will be designed at the time the roadway drawings are finalized. A great deal of coordination will be necessary between FCDC, the City of Renton Public Works Department, . and Bush, Roed & Hitchings, the civil engineers assigned to the L.I.D. project. Ideally, we would like all three projects to be designed together to ensure compatibility. We feel that granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity, nor would approval constitute a grant of special priviledge, considering the difficulty involved in designing and constructing the road through to Oakesdale at this time. The length of the cul-de-sac has been designed to accommodate the ADMAC development on the property and is a minimum variance required in order to accommodate the Renton Building Department and Fire Department. It is for these reasons that we request the variance and we appreciate your consideration in reviewing our case. Very truly yours, FIRST CITY DEVELOPMENTS CORP. (10144(AZ4-7ribil-1-- Barbara E. Moss Director of Planning BEM/dlp L Traffic Impact Analysis For BLACK RIVER TECHNOLOGY PARK June 1986 Prepared for: First City Development Corporation Prepared by: The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 14715 Bel-Red Road, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98007-3940 L L CITY 0' REN1 T ON ..E T3 r \Iil L. JUN 101986 il 2 . ' ' l TABLE OF CONTENTS __ _Page ` INTRODUCTION 1 Project Description 1 Report Organization 4 • EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 Street and Roadway Conditions 4 Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service 7 Transit Service 9 Planned Improvements 11 ! ' FUTURE CONDITIONS 14 Future Non-Project Traffic 14 Project Traffic 17 Trip Generation 17 Total Traffic with Project 22 MITIGATION 24 Transportation Management Plan 24 Transportation Network Improvements 25 SUMMARY ' 27 ' LIST OF FIGURES 1. Vicinity Map 2 2. Site Plan 3 3. Street and Roadway Characteristics . 5 4. 1986 Traffic Volumes ; 8 5. Reconfiguration of Southcenter/Grady/I-405/Interurban 13 6. Estimated 1995 Traffic Volumes Without Project 15 7. Project Trip Distribution 20 8. Project Traffic Assignment: 1995 21 9. Estimated 1995 Traffic Volumes With Project 23 l_ LIST OF TABLES 1. Existing PM Peak Levels of Service 10 L 2. Future Non-Project PM Peak Levels of Service 16 3. Project Trip Generation 18 il4. 1995 PM Peak Levels of Service 22 F ., INTRODUCTION This report is an analysis of traffic impacts related to the development of the Black River Technology Park in Renton. An Environmental Impact State- ment (EIS) was published in 1982 in which the Black River project was only vaguely identified as an office park with rail-served warehousing and the transportation impacts briefly described in terms of a range of 9,070 to 34,030 vehicle trips per day. The project has since been defined as a tech- nology park with office and research and development facilities on-site. Full development of Black River is expected to occur by 1995, and this traffic analysis focuses on 1995 for comparison between project and non-project condi- tions. Project Description The Black River Technology Park is a development proposed by First City Development Corp. It consists of a mixture of office space and research and development (R&D) facilities. The Tech Park is planned to develop from 1987 to 1995 as buildings are constructed generally from east to west over the project site, which is located in Renton adjacent to two recent developments on the Earlington Golf Course: the Valley 405 Business Park and the Washing- ton Technical Center. Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the project location within the Renton area and Figure 2 shows the Black River project. site along with building size, function, and estimated completion. Major access to Black River is provided by Naches Avenue SW, a 5-lane roadway from SW 7th to Build- ing 25, and a 2-4 lane roadway continuing north, then west to 0akesdale/Monster Road. • -1- • • -;,..-.,.,.. ___ EDMONDS WOOD ii -,,,.., ® . . • • <'I NORTH _ SR g22 = s . L • POULSBO :_ •�� -I Q' s O1 _ =IL In O • d I N M BM ..''''. . ... ........ .........7"7"; ? BELLEVUE SR 520 • wimimO \ SEATTLE BREMERTON .g . O to ISBAQUAM • 1 rr • • RENTON \\5.....*--..- -) PROJECT .• t. SITE �o I . �. is BLACK RIVER Figure 1 flr? TECHNOLOGY ' J ►" • VICINITY MAP i` - - PARK Cr"'vf. • i_- -� v " NORTH , d a 31 0Z� \ P1 35L 32 30 �\ // C. 5 33 `-' 00 29 • / P 7\ 26 \ PROJECT tt,$). SITE " ..) a 28 lel N % rl�` ` 36 - �_.. 1�`aJ 27 -11‘ 24 --- ` v - ` ,..4- SW 7TH AVE tij er 4---) �gKSpgLE AVE SW 1� W 0 W > Q BLDG./ ',FLOORS TYPE' S.F. • J 24 1 STORY R/D 20.500 25 3/1 STORIES OFFICE 6 R/D 140.000 L11 3 26 1 STORY R/D 26.650 0 0 . 27 3 STORIES OFFICE 31.500 d 28 4 STORIES OFFICE 51,500 lJ1 29 3 STORIES OFFICE 35.700 0 • 30 3 STORIES OFFICE 43,050 • 1m 31 2 STORIES OFFICE 42,500 32 3 STORIES OFFICE 48,350 7L 33 3 STORIES . OFFICE 48,350 m 34 2 STORIES OFFICE 42,500 N • 35 2 STORIES OFFICE C. R/D 62,800 4 36 3 STORIES OFFICE 107,600 P''( P0� 1-405 •• BLACK RIVER Figure 2 TECHNOLOGY SITE PLAN P �,P 0• PARK Groat 1 Report Organization The report begins with a description of the existing transportation system: streets and intersections,. traffic volumes, peak hour congestion, and transit service. This will be a summary of information gathered from field visits and recent traffic analyses of adjacent developments. Existing conditions are presented as the basis for estimating future traffic conditions along with planned improvements to vicinity roadways and intersections. Non-project traffic volumes are forecasted for 1995 and summarized, along with levels of service. Project traffic at full development is estimated for 1995 for daily and PM peak hour periods. Project traffic is then superimposed on non-project traffic for 1995 for an analysis of future conditions with Black River, based on total traffic volumes. The impacts of the project are identified through comparison between non-project and total traffic conditions. The report concludes with discussion of possible mitigating measures designed to improve conditions in the study vicinity to acceptable levels. EXISTING CONDITIONS The Black River Technology Park is located in a growth area of Renton near the west city limit. Streets and intersections in the project study area currently experience peak period congestion and the City of Renton is studying ways to improve traffic flow through the city and through the project study area. A summary of study area existing conditions follows which includes street and roadway conditions, traffic volumes, peak hour intersection levels of service, transit service and planned improvements. Documentation of existing conditions provides a basis for future year conditions and for an assessment of relative impact due to the project development. = Street and Roadway Conditions Figure 3 defines the boundary within which project-related impacts will be considered. Beyond the area shown, project traffic is well dispersed -4- V.-y , l F• 1 - Il IL 1 f I 1 t . . .i 1 I I E- .i Fr/ 1 ,'c 4L, doe'.2' MEDIAN z Q 6-e' shQLDER • - • - • SS MPH 2L. 40-44' s ^O wINDING AND `o 0 GOOD SOP£ SIDEWALKS < 60 70' •NORTH HILLY �O GOOD i a) ALIGM. NT • c • 2L. 22' 4L. 48' • POOR- -• PROJECT sIDEwAL.KS ¢ : S. 3rd St. FAIR SITE GOOD-EXC. iA NARROW-BRIDGE 0 - `,Ld �_ IS TON LIMIT 0� r,!//! !/ ./. Sunset 0 0 ',fl-. 60' . 2L. 20' f. !!!/� � /i//i S 1 DErALxS v Paoli �i. ��///i////��/// //// s oEWAucs �� 3 !/� � 35 MPH • 7 /�� / /./I*.'. FAIR-Ci00D / v• ir 1 SW 7th St. 01 i1 a Is t. 7 2Ld. . 20-22' O /0\ • ; c I ; PER 4.4 4-6L. • N • . • a) T t•A'I SIOErAtxs• 0-2 GIRT SHLD. N E O O co < �� VERY POOR t !c N C•�• UNDER•. 6 i. - ~ < Teh S% < GOOD p �o SIGN s I , c 4-5L. 48-60' >i �' pb • •• NO sIDEWALKS o 20-22' Y 40 MPH BRIDGE I ._ . GOOD NARROW BRIDGE= 1 20-22' 1GRADY) elk .• �� 4l FREEYAr •� • SW. 18th St. /<' 4-WAY I 2L. 22' • ' c - STOP So O N 1 • 0-2' SOF7 SHLD. `f,C•'14r (1. • :1 + < 6',GRAVEL 20 22,Sri0. v FAIR �� \ 25 MPH OPERATES AS A G 1'*05 -..158th St. POOR-VERY POOR FOUR-WAY-STOP cc r 14L FREEWAY Z' • .� A v C . .•c GRADY WAY,WEST OF L 1143 f ■ • •4L• . 44-48' = 2L. 20-22' . W .4 LEGEND �50 i T Sri°. o-e' SHLDS. l T AL. 4e'. MEDIAN • ,� 1 35 MPH GRADY WAY, LIND TO RAINIER • 6-e' PAVED SHLD. 0 SIGNAL • GOOD ,•� FAIR-POOR 4-6L, 40-70+' f 55 MPH. 1 SIDEWALKS • -•... STOP SIGN � co FA 1 2L 2 LANES � SNLD SHOULDER , ' - Co SOME SID SO. 35IDE WALKS p i 35 MPH p GOOD-E KC. -' BLACK RIVER Figure 3 • TECHNOLOGY STREET AND ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS �� PARK GriAr • r throughout the regional travel network. Figure 3 also illustrates pertinent lv characteristics of the streets and highways servingthe project site. The major facility through the study area is Interstate 405 (I-405) which is a four-lane freeway which runs from Tukwila at Interstate 5 (I-5), just west of the project area, north to Lynnwood at I-5 in Snohomish County. I-405 ( provides a north-south connection to the growing suburban communities east of Lake Washington and Seattle, and also is a direct connection west to Tukwila and I-5, which is the primary north-south freeway in the Puget Sound region. Within the study area, access to I-405 is limited to two locations: a full cloverleaf interchange at Rainier Avenue (also known as SR 167) and a hybrid cloverleaf/diamond interchange at Interurban Avenue (SR 181) . As shown in Figure 3, I-405 runs approximately east-west south of the project site. East of the project, Rainier Avenue, north of I-405, is a five to six-lane primary arterial in Renton which also continues north through commercial and residential districts to Seattle. South of I-405, SR 167, or the Valley Freeway, is a controlled-access freeway leading to Kent, Auburn and Puyallup. West of the project site, additional north-south capacity is provided by Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway (SR 181) . This four to five-lane facil- ity generally parallels the East Valley Freeway/Rainier Avenue, and offers alternate access to Seattle, Kent, Auburn and Puyallup. Sunset Highway, SR 900 (alternately known as Empire Way S in King County) is located north of the site and provides a third arterial connection between . Renton and Seattle. Access to Sunset from Black River is possible via SW 7th and either Rainier Avenue or Edwards/Hardie Road and via an indirect connec- tion to Monster Road and 68th Avenue S. The proposed construction of 0akesdale [ Avenue from Grady Way to Monster Road (scheduled for mid-1987) will provide an improved connection from SW 7th to Sunset. f Monster Road is a two-lane roadway of low-type design which provides t._ access from SW 16th Street under I-405 and Grady Way to Metro's Renton waste treatment plant and to Container Corporation facilities in Renton. Heading north, Monster Road becomes 68th Avenue S, which ends at Sunset Highway L (SR 900) at a stop-controlled T-intersection. The roadway is hilly and windy with little or no shoulder area, limited sight distance at times, two at-grade railroad crossings and substantial truck traffic. Within a quarter-mile of Elthe proposed junction of Monster Road with 0akesdale Avenue, a narrow two-lane bridge has a weight restriction of 15 tons. Repairs or replacement of this -6- bridge are identified by Renton Public Works staff as necessary, but the schedule is uncertain. Improvements to this corridor from Oakesdale north ,would necessarily include bridge repair, at a minimum, if not replacement, in addition to improved signing or signalization of the railroad crossings. South of the project site, Grady Way provides an important east-west connection between Renton and Tukwila. East of Lind Avenue, Grady has four or more travel lanes. Between Lind and its terminus at Interurban Avenue, Grady is a narrow, two-lane highway in generally poor condition (see later section I _ on Planned Improvements) . Within the immediate project vicinity, SW 7th and 10th Streets and Powell and Lind Avenues SW are the most important facilities. These are the streets that move traffic from the developing office/industrial project area to the regional facilities. All have benefited from recent developer-sponsored • improvements, and are in good to excellent condition. Lind Avenue extends south of I-405 to SW 43rd Street. Figure 3 also illustrates intersection control in the vicinity. Intersec- tions on SW 7th and 10th Streets in the immediate vicinity of the site are STOP controlled, with the thru movement granted to the higher volume facility. Intersections on Grady Way and Rainier Avenue are signalized. Traffic Volumes and Levels of Service Project area traffic volumes for 1986 are noted in Figure 4. These volumes are based on data collected in 1985 by TRANSPO and City of Renton staff (as referenced in the Valley 405 Business Park traffic analysis by TRANSPO), and reflect estimated growth over the past year. Traffic generated by recent developments in the immediate vicinity has been incorporated in these esti- mates of 1986 conditions. Several buildings of the Washington Technical Center campus are complete and leased in addition to three buildings of the ( Valley 405 Business Park. l_ Daily volumes in the vicinity range from 76,600 vehicles per day (vpd) on the Valley Freeway to 4,700 vpd on Powell Avenue SW just north of Grady Way. In the immediate project vicinity, volumes on Grady Way vary between 12,500 and 16,200 vpd. Farther to the west, Grady carries over 20,000 vpd, a very heavy volume for this two-lane facility. On SW 7th Street, daily volumes approximately double from 7,300 vpd near the site to 14,400 vpd near Rainier -7 i t7 �-I L--I i 11 / d SV Z �e°� y, 23,800 0; m 33.500 Q DhNay 2,360 t '' 3.310 • S CC e00 R 800 c CO 80 co S. 3rd St. 17,100 PROJECT 1,695 SITE7 0 0\`I6 24.700 SUft8et 8.900 2,450 0 ' ..A ///// # 1./. 1/�� 9 3,200 Z /,,///fi•R• /� 7.300 14,400 d: 13,900 7� /� �� /�j 730 1.440 40 1.380 10,300 1,010 N / t /.�//�/jjni y;O 30.700 m `+�Y�/�� 1 SW 7th St. 2 950 C... —�� / co O N 7,000 .t12 700 r TP&R� °1 �� m 9.500 t ss co 0 _ _.,1 Col6 28.800 L ` 'CI 9 950 t EO ; fA 0 32.600 2.560 of l`•`• ¢1 m St 3,230 39.300 47.900 O a 3 1 3,900 4,740 (I) P �� a°• y17.2000 �" 3314,47700 1,70 � 0 _1 i 24.100 aI 6.200 1 2,390 0 5 �� 1 60� • 21.000 2.080 I I SW. 16th St. 4 76.600 7.590 p I N 13,200 SOv I, Y •0 I 1.300 v IhOenter B� •, to < I — 0 12,500 CC t,A06 5.158th St. 1,2ao a. I I 15,700__ Ts 17,500__ C 1,560 C 1.730 28.840 I W '®c LEGEND T. 2.860 I s 17,000 AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUME 4 A • 1,700 PM PEAK VOLUME .4 0 • • I t SOURCES, N CO . CITY OF RENTON 9 WSDOT . co 0 . . ThE TRANSPO GROJP - -4 BLACK RIVER Figure 4 714 TECHNOLOGY • 1986 TRAFFIC VOLUMES �� PARK GrcAr r- Avenue. Volumes during the PM peak hour average about 10 percent of total daily volumes. [- These peak hour traffic volumes form the basis of level of service (LOS) analysis for intersection in the project vicinity. The analysis also takes into account intersection geometry, lane configuration, signal/STOP control , truck and buspresence in the traffic stream, pedestrian volumes at the. inter- section, and the relative evenness of demand throughout the hour. Levels of service are designated with letters ranging from A to F. LOS A indicates excellent operating conditions with essentially all vehicle queues clearing' on' each signal phase. LOS F indicates extreme congestion and that the number of vehicles entering the intersections exceeds the theoretical capacity. For signalized intersections, calculations have been made in accordance with critical movement summation techniques presented in Interim Materials on Highway Capacity (Transportation Research Circular 212, January 1980) . In this case, the total volume of entering vehicles (V) is compared to the theo- retical intersection capacity (C); the resulting V/C ratio is then related to a level of service. STOP-controlled intersections have been analyzed in accordance with techniques in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board Special Report 209) . A "reserve capacity" (i .e. , unused oppor- tunity) for each movement is related to level of service. Table 1 describes existing (1986) levels of service at intersections within the project impact area. The intersections of Rainier & Grady and Interurban & Grady are acknowledged problem areas. As can be seen on preceding figures, vehicles traveling to I-405 from the project vicinity must pass through one of these two intersec- - tions. The only alternative access to I-405 is circuitous, and would require travel eastwards on South 3rd or northwards on Rainier to the north Renton t_ interchange. Other intersections noted above are operating at levels con- sidered satisfactory under urban peak hour conditions. Transit Service L The project site is not well served by transit at the present time, although service to some points within a half mile is excellent. A single Metro route operates within reasonable walking distance of the project site: Route 241, which provides peak hour service only, traveling from Kenmore to Southcenter -9- if • • Table 1 Existing PM Peak Levels of Service • Intersection V/C LOS Rainier Avenue & Grady Way 1.01 F Interurban Avenue & Grady Way 1.02 F 7th Street & Rainier Avenue , 0.83 0 7th Street & Edwards Road (Hardie)1 0.63 B Grady Way & Lind Avenue 0.87 D Grady Way & Powell Avenue 0.40 A 7th Street & Lind Avenue N/A A/B on 7th B-0 on Lind2 1. Calculated V/C is deceptive because backups from the 7th Street & Rainier intersection frequently block this one. 2. This intersection is STOP-controlled, and the north leg is a private drive. Traffic on 7th is unimpeded; vehicles proceeding through or turning left from Lind experience significant delay. I] • I -10- L . • in the AM and from Southcenter to Kenmore in the PM. The 241 travels on SW 7th between Rainier and Lind, proceeding south on Lind. According to, Metro staff, when construction on Grady Way is complete (see next section), some routes that have been running on I-405 will return to I Grady. Also, if 7th is improved east of Rainier, Metro would likely route I several buses north on Lind from Grady, then east on 7th to the existing park- and-ride. This re-route would serve to bypass the Grady/Rainier intersection. The result of these changes .would be bringing several routes to the SW 7th/Lind intersection. All but one of the potentially-affected routes would offer peak hour service only. Transit service to the project site will be somewhat improved as a result of these changes, but not to a significant degree. Planned Improvements Various roadway and intersection improvement needs have been identified by vicinity agencies. In some instances, funding sources have been identified so that the improvements may be definitely scheduled. Four agencies were con- tacted to update the list of projects and scheduled completion: City of Renton Public Works, City of Tukwila Public Works, King County Public Works and Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). The following vicinity improvements are presently scheduled for completion prior to 1990: Anticipated Completion Date • Grady Way: - Five-lane bridge extending west to Interurban 10/86 ' - Five-lane roadway from Lind Avenue to bridge 6/87 Add eastbound right-turn lane at Rainier unknown C. • SW 7th: extend five lane roadway from west of Powell to Oakesdale. 8/87 �' • 0akesdale Avenue, new construction: { - Five-lane roadway from Grady Way to SW 7th 8/87 L - Five-lane roadway from SW 7th to Monster Road 11/87 - Five-Lane roadway and underpass from Grady Way to SW 16th Street 12/87 - Five-lane roadway from SW 28th to SW 16th unknown i= -11- °4a 4 is - ' �r, �. ,ti Traffic signals will be installed on Oakesdale Avenue at Grady Way and at SW 7th as part of the new construction. Major improvements to Monster Road and 68th Avenue S north of 0akes- dale at Monster Road to Sunset are proposed but not scheduled or funded. Anticipated Completion Date • Lind Avenue SW: Five-lane roadway to bridge over I-405 from Grady Way to SW 16th Street (dependent upon the Oakesdale underpass) . 6/88 • Sunset Boulevard between Rainier Avenue and the west city limits. Add two-way, left-turn lane and improve signalization. unknown • SW 16th Street between Lind Avenue and Oakesdale Avenue. Complete upgrading with curb, gutter and sidewalk, repaving, and channelization. unknown • SW 27th between Oakesdale and the West Valley Highway. New construction. unknown • Southcenter Boulevard/Grady Way/I-405/Interurban Avenue interchange. Reconstruction and reconfiguration. See Figure 5. unknown L-- • I-405 HOV lanes. The final segment (Renton S-curves) is scheduled for 1989. unknown I -12- A .r ‘" NORTH o F o1‘ • �•� to :; i 4 jo mons"r Roan err - Grady Way 1 ••••••••••••••••••••4 6 . .( ' W Sa J`�ca��®c I-40— %-405 " --,..___ ( , LEGEND • /Allillib'..... ........__ • NOT TO SCALE � • O SIGNAL 1 u. STOP SIGN BLACK RIVER Figure 5 TECHNOLOGY RECONFIGURATION OF SOUTHCENTER/ . . `.. e PARK GRADY/1-405/INTERURBAN Grvvr • FUTURE CONDITIONS Analysis of future conditions is achieved by first, estimating future traffic volumes in the study area without the project, second, estimating project travel characteristics at full development, third, estimating future [� volumes with project and fourth, evaluating changes or impacts in the future system due to the project. Black River is expected to reach full development in 1995, thus this analysis of future conditions is focused on 1995. Future Non-Project Traffic Future traffic volumes comprise three distinct elements: (1) existing volumes as the underlying basis, (2) new traffic generated by nearby projects scheduled for development, and (3) additional annual growth attributed to scattered development throughout the region. This is the typical procedure followed in impact studies: i .e. , to define project traffic above and beyond an underlying base condition. Two major developments in the immediate vicinity of the Black River Tech- nology Park have been identified and development has started for both the Valley 405 Business Park and the Washington Technical Center. Analysis of traffic impacts for these two projects indicates that the Valley 405 Business Park would be fully developed by 1990 and that the Washington Technical Center would be complete by 1987. Estimated traffic volumes generated by these developments are included in the forecast of 1995 traffic volumes within the study area. In addition to the known developments above, regional growth would result in further traffic volume increases on vicinity streets and highways. This increase has been based on recent trends (1980 to 1985) in traffic volumes, and upon population and employment forecasts done by Puget Sound Council of Governments. (PSCOG). Annual growth has been estimated at 3 percent on a daily basis, and at 2 percent during the PM peak. Figure 6 shows total non-project traffic volumes estimated for vicinity streets. . With daily volumes projected to increase by 3 percent per year, 1995 daily volumes would be 30 percent higher than 1986. Because peak hour volumes are expected to grow somewhat more slowly, 1995 PM volumes are estimated to be 20 percent higher than 1986 PM peak volumes. L -14- S u,aa i Away `S < R 9DOCC 8,790• m NORTH 1,080 ) 'c� / ct S. 3rd St. PROJECT SITE o „fly,/ii Sunset 0'6 , ////, „ ��* 53.330 S. / /�/ `� / 2.930 T 4,050 �Gh 300 I/ / 11,190 4 � I F // Lf/ //; ////80 1.610 �p G goo , S W 7th St. 1111 Q � � �� 5. 40)...., N • 3 ® y o/ to �� / m a % M ; 26.010 , dy�1s L * 4,200 > o CO o o .. 2.385 W• o eoo d' \ 420 < o •o m < G cc I 18,900• ; I < 1pth $t , cJI2,500 • . o • 0. I.26,530 m y 26.840 : 21.840 I, 2.47. • °0a' 2.570 : 10,250 2.070 1m 1 •A 0 l,olo h406 �� r 1 Q, SW. 16th St. 27,000• 21.580 S O to• 1,985 o`nc�®rarer gtv lit. _lie 6. oo < 33 • :c 1-4p5 • D: 3.1b8th St. > a 4111 f o 'L • > • v t • Ti . • . . • • • ea el = 0 .c p T s .LEGEND: • • f 26.840 AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUME I .•c 2.570 PM PEAK VOLUME CA I 13 CO . • ESTIMATED FROM CH2M HILL J Co 1986 RENTON STUDY DATA 0 BLACK RIVER Figure 6 TECHNOLOGY ESTIMATED 1995 TRAFFIC VOLUMES . • .... • PARK WITHOUT PROJECT Gr oar : • Traffic assignments for 1995 have been made assuming that the new Oakes- dale Avenue would be complete. It is difficult to estimate future traffic (( volumes on Oakesdale Avenue for either daily or PM peak periods. Based upon l^ rough estimates of daily volumes (EADT), two signals would be warranted on Oakesdale by 1995 (without the Black River Project) at Grady and at SW 7th. Operation of these signals is expected to be �at LOS C or better without the P 9 project. No estimate has been made for 1995 volumes at the Grady Way/Interurban/ Southcenter intersections because of the planned reconstruction project. It would be very difficult to reasonably estimate the rerouting of traffic that would result. Level of service analysis was repeated for vicinity intersections under future non-project conditions. Table 2 illustrates the results, with existing levels of service included for comparison. Table 2 Future Non-Project PM Peak Levels of Service Levels of Service Intersection 1986 1995 [ Rainier Avenue and Grady Way F F Interurban Avenue and Grady Way F N/A1 7th Street and Rainier Avenue D F 7th Street and Edwards Road (Hardie)2 B C Grady Way and Lind Avenue3,4 D D Grady Way and Powell Avenue3 A B 7th Street and Lind Avenue Left turns from 7th A/B A/F Thru, right and left from Lind B-D F I] 11 1. Planned reconstruction of intersection makes a reliable estimate impossible. 2. Back-ups from the 7th and Rainier intersection will frequently affect operation at this one. 3. Improvements to Grady Way presumed complete in 1987. 4. Improvements to Lind Avenue presumed complete in 1988. The intersection of Rainier and Grady will continue to approach or exceed theoretical capacity. The Interurban and Grady intersection will be extremely congested by 1987; the likely result will be a lengthened peak period and possibly a greater traffic diversion to alternate I-405 access. To some extent, traffic can be expected to even out through the area as drivers learn to avoid trouble spots. In this area, however, all routes to the regional freeway system will be troublesome. By 1995, non-project traffic will result in deterioration to LOS E or worse at two intersections: 7th and Rainier, and 7th and Lind.. These inter- sections, as well as Rainier and Grady, will be in need of improvement, even without the added impacts of the Black River Technology Park. Project Traffic Project-related traffic has been estimated in four steps. Trip generation is the estimation of total trips generated by the project at full development. Mode Split is a process of estimating the percentage of project trips made by each of the various transportation modes available near the site. Trip distribution is the process of predicting the origins and destinations of trips to and from the project. Traffic assignment is the process of deter- mining specific routes for the daily and peak hour trips, so that impacts upon roadways and intersections may be identified. Trip Generation. Table 3 summarizes estimated vehicle trip generation for [ the project, by building and completion date. Daily and peak hour trip rates are based on averages and assumptions reported in the ITE Trip Generation t manual (Third Edition). t In 1995, combined floor space of 701,000 gross square feet (GSF) is pro- posed to be complete, with 572,730 GSF for office use and 128,270 GSF for l research and development (R&D) use. Total generation is estimated ated at 13,887 vehicles per day (vpd) and 1,589 vehicles per hour (vph) during the PM peak. �. Mode Split. Many traffic analyses include an additional step at this point, whereby total trips generated by a project are divided among the vari- E: ous available travel modes. Depending upon the project location, this process has more or less significance. For example, considerable numbers of • -17- • LTable 3 Project Trip Generation Offic R&D Total Space' Space2 Space. Daily PM Pk Pk In Pk Out Bldg # Yr Open (1K GSF) (1K GSF) (1K GSF) Trips Trips Trips Trips 24 1990 -- 20.50 20.50 297 34 5 29 L 25 1987 84.00 56.00 140.00 2576 295 44 251 26 1991 26.65 26.65 386 45 7 38 27 1989 31.50 -- 31.50 662 76 11 . 64 28 1989 51.50 -- 51.50 1082 124 19 105 [i 29 1991 35.70 __ 35.70 750 86 13 73 30 1991 43.05 43.05 904 103 15 88 31 1992 42.50 -- 42.50 893 102 15 87 32 1992 48.35 -- 48.35 1015 116 17 99 33 1993 48.35 -- 48.35 1015 116 17 ' 99 34 1993 42.50 -- 42.50 893 102 15 87 I: 35 1994 37.68 25.12 62.80 1156 133 20 113 36 1995 107.60 -- 107.60 2260 258 39 220 IJTotal Office Space, 1000 GSF 572.73 Total R&D Space, 1000 GSF 128.27 Total Space, 1000 GSF 701.00 Total Daily Trips, Full Development 13887 11 Total PM Pk Hr Trips, Full Development 1589 Total PM Pk Hr Trips In, Full Development 238 Total PM Pk Hr Trips Out, Full Development 1351 I1. Trip generation for office space from ITE Trip Generation, 3rd Edition for Office Park. Daily: 21 trips/1000 Gross Square Feet (GSF); PM Peak: II 2.4/1000 GSF. 2. Trip generation for research & development (R&D) space estimated by 50% of space = office, 25% = warehouse, and 25% = assembly. II Warehouse - Daily: 6 trips/1000 GSF; PM Peak: 0.9/1000 GSF. Assembly - Daily: 10 trips/1000 GSF; PM Peak: 1.0/1000 GSF. Resulting R&D rates: Daily: 14.5 trips/1000 GSF; PM Peak: 1.675/1000 GSF. 1 1 • . { t -18- . r • workers at an office building in downtown Seattle could be expected to commute via public transit. Also, the proximity of restaurants, banks, and shops and other would encourage midday pedestrian trips: On the other hand, a suburban office/technical park like Black River Technology Park does not present employees and visitors with the same oppor- tunities for transit and walk trips. As stated earlier, the project site is not at present well served by transit. Even if Metro incorporates all poten- t ial routing changes, the nearest bus stops will be on Lind Avenue, Grady Way, and SW 7th east of Lind. Further, opportunities for pedestrian trips will be limited unless/until restaurants and shops develop nearby. A worst case traffic analysis is presented in this report where no allow- • ance has been made for transit or walk trips to the project site. An aggres- sive ridesharing incentive program may reduce project vehicle trips by 2-5%, but for this worst case analysis, all trips to and from the site are assumed to be made by vehicle with minimal ridesharing, as reflected in ITE trip estimates. Trip Distribution. Figure 7 illustrates the general origins and destina- tions of trips generated by the Black River Technology Park project, as developed by TRANSPO for the Valley 405 Business Park. The distribution has been based on two data sources. First, the travel distribution prepared in 1981 for the Bellevue Long Range Transportation Study was examined. Second, regional forecasts of employment and population prepared in March 1984 by the Puget Sound Council of Governments were considered. Daily and peak hour distributions vary somewhat. During the peak hour, project traffic is dominated by employee work-to-home trips. Throughout the day, project travel is oriented to other offices, to retail facilities, and to the regional freeway system. Traffic Assignment. Figure 8 illustrates the assignment of project traffic to vicinity streets and highways in 1995. A total of 13,887 vpd and 1,589 vph are assigned to the vicinity street system. Figure 8 includes the new Oakesdale Avenue, its connection to the West Valley Highway, and the extension of SW 7th to Oakesdale. Within the development itself, Naches L Avenue from SW 7th to Oakesdale/Monster Road is shown. Also noted is the ( realignment of the Grady/ Interurban/Southcenter area. L • • • -19- s . 4n+.P y/94_ > :is, 15% . . 10% r _sq goo o N 15% 5% PROJECT j S. 3rd St. co SITE A J4 -rL ////�%/ ///'y. /// Sunse 13 NORTH 0 � 7/„et"�1/ / // /�/��///i /�/,,%��//rrm 10% �, �/ r, ;4 10% •1 ; SW 7th St. 0 o CO o II:16R 44•i *a) ® E co m • -- 7 et'61 A v o t o colpilitu,_ -1 - > •• v ... c .6,,.)..... �O1• YJ 2.. I ° 0 - 1-406 No '_ V 0. 3 5% sw. 16tn St. 30% �CO-ON A •Y • • O Center 6 ` ' t • c t-4p5 S.168th St. • r s • I. ii t i > • • s .c • * w • o 'n o 20% 10% • LEGEND �, 25% 15% 35X DAILY D CO 30X PM PEAK O . J BLACK RIVER Figure 7 TECHNOLOGY PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION �ru G llip son • z et Nip, < - 972 A 1.389 `SR 800 0 80 NORTH 191 c m cc S. 3rd St. PROJECT SITE �yd 3.398 /// // /i �/ 10,19 Sunset 0 695 //, d>, 389 i R, //�j 1.167 297 9 �/ i j/�/ 4.722 48 1,667 L.�' 7� �� " I ��/.� �'^'y5.00045 4;4 2.360 143 ® ��j�� p26 �+- 477SW th St. 254 S. 1 5• i r I ^Q I %• / a) V 3 1--___278 ,t- 7' 3,429 Ct 3 394 1l� 6,377 < E N m co co 2,223 I O. 64 • 394 9 640 _ N L > Q • 286 a• 6,075 II 1,424 8 1- < $t > 417 to 8Cb 760 • 163 Q Otte < 1,506 48 . 9 4' Tie o_ 238 v 0, 3,750 • 3.055 J Ito I 695 430 1,702 334 2,499 Jc N � 32 0 179 I-40b 1 �� 224 I SW. 18th St. 695 694 • c'II ; 78 32 o N 695 90044 Y o 159 > v Cgnt•r 6� . ' t 0 t-AO5 5.158th St. >. • . f Ts 4. > 2.361 _ • • • 366 • 4 •W • 2 4 0 • • •• ft � • 1 •. LEGEND N 1 2 0A 3.750 AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUME p 430 PM PEAK VOLUME 0) 01 . -4 BLACK RIVER Figure 8 IrDo TECHNOLOGY PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ' • _ . e PARK : 1995 Gt®ty I: • Total Traffic with Project Figure 9 shows future traffic volumes for 1995 including project-generated traffic. .The volumes shown represent the sum of non-project and project volumes for both daily and PM peak periods, from Figures 6 and 8. Also shown are percentage figures which indicate the portion of total traffic generated by the project. In 1995, traffic from Black River Technology Park project is estimated to account for 12 percent of the total daily traffic on Powell Avenue SW, for 60 I percent of the total daily traffic on SW 7th between Powell and Oakesdale, and for 47 percent of the estimated total daily traffic on Oakesdale Avenue north of Grady Way. Project traffic is expected to make up 12 percent of total daily traffic on Grady Way west of Oakesdale. Project contributions to PM peak hour traffic for these streets are similar to that for the daily traffic. Project impact lessens with distance from the site. Table 4 shows PM peak hour levels of service (LOS) for key intersections within the project study area for 1995 both with and without project traffic. Decreased LOS due to the project will be noted at Grady Way and Lind Avenue and at Grady Way and Powell Avenue. Table 4 1995 PM Peak Levels of Service 1995 1995 Intersection 1986 Without Project With Project [ LOS LOS V/C LOS V/C Rainier Avenue & Grady Way F F 1.23 F 1.26 SW 7th & Rainier Avenue D F 1.13 F 1.26 SW 7th & Edwards Road (Hardie)1 B C 0.72 C 0.73 Grady Way & Lind Avenue D D 0.86 E 0.95 Grady Way & Powell Avenue A B 0.63 C 0.73 SW 7th & Lind Avenue Left turn from 7th A/B A/F N/A A/F N/A Left/thru/right from Lind B-D F N/A F N/A El. Back-ups from the 7th and Rainier intersection will frequently affect operation at this one. L • -22- s e,q_+•f z q 10,180 14X a0 < 1,660 12x s 0 ® co NORTH 13,123 78% 1,467 Box ¢ S. 3rd C St. 6.926 PROJECT . 1.067- SITE 3,398 61% �d�' //i///// //, Sunset 0 54,997 32 �l, 389 67% /i///,•.i I% /// 4.193 3X ///� //‘�� //// / / j� 22.190 23% � �R•L!�//I //�j 2.087 23% • 0 tlt I. // S�(/ 1//��j/�/�n.Ifi 1 v SW 7th St. ' `^•7 9.319 37X1 • ; o WN 30,732 15X' P&R m•i 6,599 52X 1,194 33X • 4 N c • 2,830 16% n G 64 784 50% I. '10,577 < E > <s 0 1,060 _ 0 < 28.753 8% 24,980 24% L ®> • 1.044 3,260 23X 60% 3 F- < toth gt < 2,756 If • p 100 • 60% 0 I 11,674 12% • a. v i . c 4jo 1,173 14X Y 24,895 12X J 1 '•/ 30,590 12% 4 2.404 14% IA IlLsibib. IN) •, 3,000 4% 0I-406 C....) �� 1 a ' .22.27 5opprill33cO;' SW. 16t2h7.S00t. 3X 3%So0Iy •: 2.550 6% • o•ntep 6 ' < c co cc r.*°b 8.168th St. > >. < • 1 • o < 3 > • v < • � • .c Y 4 w m 0 .c O 1,LEGEND • i • o r; f 1,044 AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLU€ I 1 100 PM PEAK VOLUTECO 13 co % CONTRIBUTION BY PROJECT , 71 OF TOTAL TRAFFIC o) J . r BLACK RIVER Figure 9 TECHNOLOGY . . ,...,. • PARK ESTIMATED 1995 TOTAL TRAFFIC WITH PROJECT CrUIr f( MITIGATION Traffic impacts from the Black River Technology Park are most significant in the immediate vicinity of the project where new roadways are proposed to serve this project and traffic from adjacent new developments. Traffic oriented east and south from the site will use existing facilities which are currently at or near capacity during peak periods. The purpose of mitigation for this project is two fold: (1) to reduce site-generated vehicle trips, and (2) to significantly improve project site access. A transportation management plan for the project will be developed by the project proponent with the aim of reducing vehicle trips, and a list of improvements to the transportation network are presented which are expected to mitigate project impacts. Transportation Management Plan The developer is committed to working with Metro Transit and Commuter Pool to develop a transportation management plan for the project which will encourage ridesharing and attempt to reduce project vehicle trips. The trans- portation management plan (or TMP) may consist of any or all of the following items: ( • Work with METRO to establish a new bus route or modify an existing bus route to pass through the project. • If bus service is modified to be convenient, encourage employers to consider transit pass subsidies as a company or office/tech park benefit. • First City Development Corp. will provide a contact person for the office/tech park as a liaison between Metro and the tenants. [I • First City Development Corp. agrees to work with Metro to determine the viability of vanpools financed in order to reduce the project y vehicle trip generation. • Office park management should advise tenants and their employees of the advantages of fleet ride, vanpool and carpool programs through a package of information provided at initial occupancy for each tenant, I] and through periodic promotional displays within the leasing office. -24- • - t • As much as practical , office park management should encourage employers to initiate a flextime work schedule so peak period traffic can be. distributed more evenly over the 3:30 PM to 5:30 PM peak period. • Notification of employer occupancy dates and resulting estimated employee numbers on an ongoing basis. Transportation Network Improvements The construction of 0akesdale Avenue from Grady Way to Monster Road will provide access to the Black River Technology Park. However, this single roadway is not enough to provide good access to the project from any direction. Peak period congestion along Rainier Avenue to the east of the site is an obstacle for traffic which is difficult to remove, as the intersections are currently designed near the maximum in lane configuration and operation. Improvements in the access network must then come from another source or focus on another area. 0akesdale Avenue Corridor. It is proposed to construct 0akesdale Avenue, from SW 43rd to Sunset Highway (SR 900) (along Monster Road and 68th Avenue S) , although scheduled construction is from SW 16th to Monster Road. Approxi- mately 10 percent of Black River traffic is estimated to use Monster Road and 68th Avenue S to access Sunset which, when added to Valley 405 Business Park traffic on the route and current traffic, would increase daily traffic on 68th ( Avenue S from 800 trips in 1984 to approximately 10,180 trips in 1995. Traffic from the Black River development will represent approximately 14 percent of the total in 1995. The existing two-lane minimal design facility should be improved to a two-lane facility with shoulders and 11-12 foot lanes. The project proponent will agree to participate in an improvement district to construct the extension of 0akesdale to the Sunset Highway. Naches Avenue Design. Naches Avenue, the proposed on-site roadway serving Black River, will be constructed initially as a cul-de-sac, to be extended the full length to 0akesdale/Monster Roads as the Black River development progresses. [. The length of cul-de-sac which would provide a single access to Black River (aside from Powell Avenue to building 24) with acceptable operation was analyzed. Naches Road will operate satisfactorily as a cul-de-sac with STOP control at 7th Street through the construction and occupation of Building 25 in 1987. Subsequently, an all-way STOP will be required at 7th and Naches to permit -25- L left-turning traffic to exit the Black River development. By 1989, under the a proposed build-qut scheme, a traffic signal may be warranted at this intersec- tion. The project proponent agrees to pay their proportionate share for traffic control at this intersection. Network Improvements. The following is a list of problem areas within the P . Jstudy ro 'ect area which need to be addressed. on a subarea basis. Congestion at many locations in Renton is *a function of area growth, new developments and bypass or thru traffic, therefore funding for these projects should be shared among those groups involved. Percent Project Location Action Traffic Grady Way @ Lind Avenue Add third eastbound thru lane 7.7 to Rainier SW 7th @ Lind Avenue Install signal 16.1 SW 7th @ Powell Avenue 4-way STOP, as left turns from 28.8 Powell become intolerable. ( Install signal when warranted. SW 7th @ Naches Road Install signal 67.4 Monster Road/68th Avenue S Improve 2-lane roadway 13.7 [I I.� IL -26- [7 SUMMARY Traffic impacts of the Black River Technology Park are significant in the local area bounded by Rainier Avenue, Grady Way, Monster Road, and the Sunset Highway. Levels of service are projected to be poorest in the.east side of the study area even without the project along Rainier Avenue. Construction of the project contributes to a further degradation of that level of service to the extent that peak periods will lengthen. The City of Renton has hopes that the construction of Oakesdale Avenue from south of 43rd up to SR 900 via the 68th Avenue S alignment may provide some relief for Rainier Avenue. No studies have yet been done to demonstrate the amount of diversion that might occur. Yet it is obvious that additional roadway facilities must be built. Five road and intersection improvements have been identified which will be significantly impacted by this project. Each improvement can mitigate the project impact to provide level of service D or better. The percentage the project contributes to the 1995 traffic at those locations has been estimated. Such a contribution estimate could be used as a consideration in determining cost sharing for the improvements. IL • 6A. -27- FzaL -BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK, ADMAC ' THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °15' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1596.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°45100" EAST 175.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 883.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 165.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °15'00" EAST 553.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE 8.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°45'00" WEST 290.11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58 °15' 00" EAST 70.42 FEET TO 'A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 710.00 FEET OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 1°45' 00" WEST 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°15'00" WEST 605.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 187 ,922 SQUARE FEET FOR 4.3134 ACRES. (NOTE: THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A LEGAL SEGREGATION) BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK, ACCESS ROAD WEST OF ADMAC (NACHES AVENUE SOUTHWEST) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WITHIN 30.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °15' 00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 1626.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 225.00 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 853.34 FEET A DISTANCE OF 209.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12 °19 '12" WEST 329.69 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET A DISTANCE OF 35.76 FEET TO POINT "A" AND THE END OF SAID CENTERLINE, ALSO THAT PORTION OF SAID SUBDIVISION NOT HERE BEFORE DESCRIBED LYING WITHIN 50.00 FEET OF SAID POINT "A" , CONTAINING 53,454 SQUARE FEET FOR 1.2271 ACRES. (NOTE: THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A LEGAL SEGREGATION) FIRST CITY/SCHUMAN BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK ADMAC SITE BRH JOB NO. 85235 .07 MAY 29 , 1986 ALH/SUt,,,DISK 8 t.HITcy�=— &sv o WA,n 1/Q-lr • ti N • O E Q-►`r' .;� T ERti y'c+��3y f°h'4l tooSJa7'� �''� 1P��CITYlll OF € EN7T�ON F,... JUN 101986 . .. _ ' 8111LDING/ZONING DEPT, 1 of 2 LANDSCAPE BUFFER NO. 1, SOUTH OF ADMAC THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 990.52 FEET. TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 605.98 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °15'00" EAST 605.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°45'00" WEST 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 30,299 SQUARE FEET FOR 0.6956 ACRES. (NOTE: THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A LEGAL SEGREGATION) BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK, BUFFER NO. 2, SOUTHEAST OF ADMAC' THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 650.00 FEET THEREOF, SAID NORTH LINE BEING ALSO THE NORTH LINE OF WASHINGTON TECHNICAL CENTER AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 122 OF PLATS, PAGES 98 THROUGH 102, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 856.35 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF POWELL AVENUE SOUTHWEST AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °15'00" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 134.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1°45'00" EAST 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 °15'00" EAST 134.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1°45'00" WEST 50.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 6,708 SQUARE FEET FOR 0.1540 ACRES. (NOTE: THIS DESCRIPTION IS NOT A LEGAL SEGREGATION) FIRST CITY/SCHUMAN BLACK RIVER CORPORATE PARK ADMAC SITE BRH JOB NO. 85235. 07 MAY 14, 1986 ALH/SURV. DISK 8 iiiicj‘k L.Hi r Ati 4. of ASyi� /STESt x(4, r �%INIAH� yJfr g� art OF EltENIONr3 j JUN 101986 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. 2of2 "OF R4, ' �' ECF: Ia to 0 z City of Renton Map 0 amok 11) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0947.E0 SEPiti��P Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description.you can. . You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist t'or Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: ADMAC Building B1ackRiver Corporate Park (Earlington Industrial Park) 2. Name of applicant: First City Equities 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Barbara Moss First City Equities 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4170 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 624-9223 4. Date checklist prepared: June 5, 1986 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Building & Zoning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction - Summer 1986 CITY OF EZ NTON JUN 101186 ,._. . BUILDING/MMNING DEPT. 7. Do you have any plan r future additions, expansions, or ether activity related • to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. • Possible Phase II of the project to add 'wa.reh"ous'e office'and site.- area L'w.ith : parking as required to the North of proposed project. Phase II Landscaping to reflect Phase. I concept and specific requirements to be determined at that. time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Original E. I .S. for Black River Office Park by R.W. Thorpe and. Associates for Renton Property Associates, April , 1983. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. City of Renton Building Permit and Site Plan Approval . 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to • repeat those answers on this page. Design and construction of a 93,170 S.F. two story building with office, manufacturing and warehouse uses. Parking for the various uses shall be provided as required by code. Landscape yards •to be incorporated with the parking and building on approximately 187,922 S. F. of site, excluding a landscape buffer (not required) established by First City Equities as part of this phase and the Master Plan Development. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While .you • should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps o.r detailed plans si.bmitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Located in an existing area of development adjacent similar projects off Natches Avenue S.W. and ±600' North of S.W. 7th 'in Renton, Washington (North of Interstate 405). • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); CP rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? One Percent (1%) except area of drainage ditch. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, 'Muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Sand, Silt and gravel d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. - 2 - e. Describe the pu, le, type, and approximate quanti1____ of any filling or • grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill or surcharge material to be used is on site, per separate approved � . permihits. Any..new..structural fill will be hauled on site. Source unknown is f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Site is flat, minor erosion of surface could occur on site. • g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 75% h. Proposed measures to reduce, or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: :Siltation and erosion control per City Standards. • 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., . dust, .automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Normal emmissions from dust, auto and truck equipment, and roofing during construction. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: • • • Water site to reduce dust. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. P-1 drainage channel one-half (1/2) mile away. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/A - 3 - 1 4) Will the proposal iire surface water withdrawals o versions? Give • general description. _lipase, and approximately quantitibo , known. No. • • • - 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. • Yes. 6) Does the proposal involve any (discharges of waste materials to surface • • waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. None. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water .be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. None. +f 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from . septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; • industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the• ! I number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or ! ! humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water into storm drainage system per City Standards and to detention area at P-1 channel . ( 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. • No. • ^q5:` • x ' ' ;e1ri t h.1f. - 4 - • j . • d. Proposed mea- is to reduce or control surface, gi'Jul id, and runoff water • impacts, if any: Storm drain system with catch basins connected to storm drainage system. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: It deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other • o Shrubs th grass • • o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Clear and grub all existing grass and scrub Alder except significant trees noted on site plan to be preserved. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Grass lawn areas, combined with mix of Evergreen and deciduous trees • • and shrubs. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk heron eagle, songbirds, other seagulls, sparrows Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. • • - 5 - 1 2 • d. Proposed mea Is to preserve or enhance wildlife, ,y: , Addition of trees and landscaping. • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Use of gas and electric power for heat, lights and air conditioning. . • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? if so, generally describe. • No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this • proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Meets Washington State Energy Code requirements. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. , • N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: N/A • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic,equipment, operation, other)? None. • - 6 - • 1 2) What types al . evals of noise would be created by .,r associated with the i • project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come • from the site. • Construction noise from normal work hours 7-5 for a short term basis.' 1 I 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: ' None: noise not significant in relation to existing adjacent uses. I 1 8. ' Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? 1 i Undeveloped site with adjacent undeveloped properties. 1 • b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. • c. Describe any structures on the site. None. • . d.. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? • No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? MP f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MP g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of '; the site? a"1 N/A a,;,. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" ` ',.'' area? If so, specify. ; No .' �;j. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed, ;1 project? aii dy' Approximately• 165 - �`� J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? c4:: None. Ai, et', k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: '.pa N/A ;: `. '' - 7 - l'ti,. IR. 1. Propose( aasures to ensure the proposal is ipatible with existing and • projected land uses and plans, if any: Use is compatible with adjacent uses. • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,.or low-income housing. N/A c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A • • 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. 34 ft. maximum height plus mechanical for roof mounted equipment. Painted concrete and glass exterior building materials. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Articulated horizontal reveals to reduce scale of building with accents • of reflected and tinted glass combined with heavily landscaped areas. 11... Light and Glare ' • I a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light from parking lighting at night time. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Control light dispersion of pole lights and building lighting to prevent glare off site and on site. - 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Provide links to jogging paths programmed around development and P-1 drainage detention ponds. • 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state. • or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. N/A • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: N/A • 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Direct access to Powell Avenue S.W. and Natches Avenue, ultimately to . Interstate 405 with on/off ramps at Interurban to the West and Old Rainier Avenue to the East. b. Is site currently served by !public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, approximately 3/4 mile. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? - .5$•stalls with 44- future=stalls, none eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to I. existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Would require improvement of Natches Avenue S.W. at this time (public street) and extended in a Phase I position approximately 800 feet into the property. - 9 - e. Will the project a (or occur in the immediate vici, _ of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. l No. f. -How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. See * below. 0 • g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Proximity to bus line and other developments to incorporate car pooling and transit bus use. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for • example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Project will require normal fire protection and police protection already serving the area. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: ectricity, natural gas water, refuse service, to ep one, son y sewe septic system, other. From Powell Avenue and the improvement of Naches Avenue. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility • providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrical power, gas, water, sewer, telephone. All utilities are accessible from Powell Avenue and the improvement of Naches Avenue requir.ing minor excavation to extend to the building. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: L1561--de1/171-4.1-------- • Name Printed: Barbara E. Moss • • • See.attached- 1Ok Vehicular trips and exhibits and..l egal 'descr.ipt igns , r • • • • -10- *Daily Trip Rate: Office space = 21 trips/1,000 S.F. x 31,540 S.F. = 662.3 daily trips Warehouse space = 6 trips/ 1,000 S.F. x 13,097 S.F. = 78.6 daily trips Assembly space = 10 trips/1,000 S.F. x 48,533 S. F. = 485.3 'daily trips Total Daily Trips = 1,226.1 trips PM Peak Hour: Office = 2.4 trips/1,000 S. F. x 31,540 S. F. = 75.7 trips/PM Peak Hour Warehouse = 0.9 trips/1,000 S.F. x 13,097 S.F. = 11.8 trips/PM Peak Hour Assembly = 1.0 trips/1,000 S. F. x 48,533 S.F. = 48.5 trips/PM Peak Hour Total Peak Hour Trips . = 136 trips/PM Peak Hour Base on Trip Generation and Informational Report, 3rd Edition, published in 1982 by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Per Traffic Impact Anaylsis, Table 3 for (..B1.ackRiver Technology Park) .B.lackRiv.er Corporate Park, June 1986, by THE TRANSPO GROUP. • -10A- 1\ 1' �I; • f+` 1 • Architecture and Planning Leason Pomeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg A.I.A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 TRANSMITTAL . TO: City of Renton DATE: ' June 11, 1986 Department of Building & Zoning 200 Mill Avenue South PROJECT: ADMAC Building Renton, WA 98055 B1ackRiver Corpaorate Park PROJECT NO: NW 86007 ATTN: Jannette Samek RE: Site Approval Submittal NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1Copy Completed Application Form with Legal Descriptions & Affidavit of Ownership. 1Copy Environmental. Checklist Form with original signature 1 Copy Letter of Design Intent. 1 Set . Prints, Site Plan with Vicinity plan, Building Elevations & Landscape Plans. 1 Copy Conceptual Master Plan. 1 Copy Vicinity Plan REMARKS: To supplement submittal fOrSite Approval OF RENTON LECERVE 1CITY J UPS 21986 J FLEETFOOT BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. BY: Y. Ken K. Chin cc. 0 Architecture and Planning I 0 Pmeroy Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg A.I.A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 TRANSMITTAL City of Renton June 9, 1986 T0: Department of Building & Zoning DATE. 200 Mill Avenue South PROJECT: ADMAC Building Renton, WA 98055 B1ackRiver Corporate Park PROJECT NO: NW 86007 ATTN: RE: Site Approval Submittal NUMBER DESCRIPTION 6 Copies Completed Application Form with legal Descriptions & Affidavit Of Ownership. 6 Copies Environmental Checklist . Form 6 Copies Letter of Design Intent. 6 Sets Prints, Site Plan with vicinity plan, building elevations & Landscape Plans. 1 Set 8 1/2" .x 11 .PMT reduction of drawings above. 1 Application fee, check #12944 $501.50 REMARKS: 1 Copy Traffic impact anaylsis for B1.ackRiver, June 1986 by The Transpo Group 1 Copy Conceptual Master Plan Submittal for Site Approval . e.gTl, (-A: Pet¢„ omy 10. 1PAr4AWN ) U , J UN 101986 BY: Y. Ken K. Chin cc. Barbara Moss, FCE with enclosure 1 Greg Byler, FCE with enclosure (" 'N Architecture and Planning +-�PP ,, 1 y Northwest,Inc.,Royce A.Berg A.I.A.,114 Vine Street(2nd&Vine)Seattle,WA 98121(206)728-5771 • TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Renton DATE: June 9, 1986 Dept. of Building & Zoning ADMAC Building 200 Mill Avenue South PROJECT: BlackRiver Corporate Park Renton, WA 98055 PROJECT NO: NW 86007 ATTN: RE: Variance Application Submittal NUMBER DESCRIPTION 6 Copies Completed Application Form 6 Copies Letter of Justification by First City Equities 6 Copies Plot Plan with Vicinity Plan by Bush, Roed & Hitchings 1 Copy 82x11 PMT reduction of Plot Plan above 1 Orig. Application Fee, $150, Check 12999 (FCE) REMARKS: Submittal for Temporary Naches Avenue culdesac variance. HAND DELIVERED CITY-OF RtsIN,TONI '' D 1., inifiiri Li BY: Y. Ken K. Chin JUN 101986 cc. Barbara Moss, FCE w/encl . Greg Byler, FCE w/encl . . 1 , NDING OF FILE FILE TITLE &It I I