The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA78-185 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular:-,Meeting,', September 11 ,, 1978 Council Chambers . Monday, 8: ,00 P M` Municipal Building M ";I; N:.:%U 'T E S' CALL TO ORDER Mayor C. J. Delaur.enti , led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and called: the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS 'W.. TRIMM, BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, COUNCIL PATRICIA M. SEYMOUR-THORPE AND GEORGE J. PERRY. CHARLES F. SHANE arrived momentarily."": MOVED'BY SHIIIPOCH, SECOND PERRY, ABSENT • COUNCILMAN EARL CLYMER BE. EXCUSED.. . CARRIED. MINUTE APPROVAL Councilmarr-Strredicke-requested clarification of Council Minutes August 28, 1978 of 8/28/78 Page 1 regarding Minute Approval"of 8/21/78 meeting, with addition that comment added for the record by Councilwoman Thorpe •re ,Forward Thrust Projects was her opinion and did not reflect decision of attorney or' court. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL APPROVE COUNCIL.'MINUTES OF 8/28/78. CARRIED. CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES: J, 'DELAURENTI,, Mayor; LAWRENCE WARREN, City Attorney, GWEN , MARSHALL; , Finance: Director, DEL MEAD, City Clerk; WARREN GONNASON, Public!Works Director;.:.GORDON Y: 'ERICKSEN; Planning Director; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director; SHARON GREEN, Personnel Director; ..DONALD CUSTER,.Administrative. Assistant; ' JOHN BUFF, Police: Representative, • PRESS • Ed Eaton, .'Ren'ton Record-Chronicle. AUDIENCE COMMENT William D':" Johnson,'. P. O. Box 201 , Renton, called attention to the sewer;' instal lation' in regard to Hi-Gate development and that the • • developer has waived :late-comer charges, asking that the City remove Sewer' Connections • assessments: from'home' 'owners:, "Upon discussion, Councilman Stredicke • called attention ,to 'lette,r of .7/14/78 from Wall. & Redekop Corp. , Area of Hi-Gate • Development" Bel levue' ,'Hi-Gate�.,Developer;. agreeing to waive late corer, s fees for property mithin' 100. ft, 'of proposed sewer to be' constructed by' 'them, mot Including :any'.parties wishing to extend line. MOVED ' BY PERRY,':':--SECOND THORPE; COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE ORDINANCE REGARDING THIS SUBJECT FOR READING.AT THIS TIME: City Clerk Mead read: or.dinance amending Ci ty Code Section 8-702 which does not re quire;:;home owner to-connectto developer installed sewer line when the sewer,.,r;was installed ,to meet platting requirements and home owner is not within the plat. . MOVED BY THORPE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL ADVANCE .ORDINANCE TO.:-SECONOAND FINAL READINGS. CARRIED. Follow , ing readings of the'fordinance, .Mrs: Lola Johnson, Box 201 , Renton,:: ' , inquired regarding_::hooking-up to the- sewer and was advised of home owner 'responsibility•to :provide line on own property. Councilwoman ' Shinpoch noted that though this 'ordinance is, 'a direct "result of the Hi-Gate development, 'the ordinance applies to all future developments. .", : Discussion ensued re charges' in the event developer did not waive Ordinance '#3245 late corner's fees, Public Works Director Gonnason read City Code.;..:. Public Sewers re HSecion '8-717 sewer'assessments,, noting this was a special instance.. , • Developer MOVED BY 'THORPE, SECOND PERRY,: COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ: Installed Lines ROLL. CALL:: ALL AYES OF THOSE. 000NCILMEMBERS PRESENT. CARRIED, MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE, CODE SECTION 8=717 BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND' MEANS COMMITTEE FOR RECOMMENDATION, CARRIED. Hi-Gate MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND THORPE, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND ADVANCE Prepliminary Plat TO HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT MATTER CARRIED, Hearing Examiner decision PP-184-78 of July 2$ 1978 recommended approval with conditions of request Wall & Redekop :Co, by Wall. &-'Redekop `Corp: ;for. approval 'of a 30=lot preliminary plat E-18.5-78 ;. and:.exception to the'""Subda'vis'ion Ordinance to permit a hammerhead' rather than cul-de-sac at the end ,of .a 230 ft. street (NE 19th St, ) ` Located! , off Monterey Ave. NE: ' The Planning- and Development Committee report Monterey Ave:.,NE ;was submitted by ComMittee' Chairman Perry noting review of the record Extended Between and Hearing Examiner'.s written decision,. findings and 'conclusions NE 20th and NE-16 Per Section 4-3017:.and recommended; concurrence in the Hearing Examiner's. decision for approval with conditions of Hi-Gate Prelimin aryy Plat PP-284-78,and:Exception No, .E-185-78, MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. SI . • 0 • Renton City Council . ' 9/1.1/78 Page 2 . Hi-Gate Development . ' Continued Councilman Stredicke inquired for clarification of the record and audience whether committee recommendations were in keeping with the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner also as regards sewer line, being advised by Committee Chairman Perry, that committee report is in full agreement. Councilwoman Thorpe inquired whether sewer line installation in the Hi-Gate plat was finalized, noting icost information for NE 16th .St. as opposed to NE• 20th installation. ' Public Works Director Gonnason explained costs of the two locations ` noting NE 16th would be considerably more expensive for the developer, • however, noted less costly to the City to operate pumping at Jones Ave. line rather than NE 16th due to shorter distance and lower • pumping head. Councilwoman Thorpe further inquired re stability and ' maintenance of lint via blueberry farm rather than on 16th and was advised that no problems are forseen by the Public Works Director. • Councilwoman Thorpe requested comments be included in. the record • for assistance at time of final plat approval . Councilman Perry reported that sewers for this area are in the planning stage and ' subject to change to either NE 16th or NE 20th (being confirmed by ;: the Public Works Director.) .•and Perry further requested inclusion in a the record. Dana Backiel , 1835 NE. 20th, explained being a renter on the property . to be developed for Hi-Gate and' asked when bulldozing of the proper- ty could commence, being advised by the Public Works Director that . " would_ be developer's determination, suggesting not prior to 30 days. OLD BUSINESS--,,,,, ' - Transportation Transportation Committee Chairman •Shinpoch presented report • Committee Report recommending award of contract for LID No. 302, Lind Ave. , to • LID 302 Lind Ave Frank Coluccio Construction, Co.., low bidder; in the amount of Contract Award $3,761 ,633.85. The report further recommended the Mayor and 'City Clerk be authorized to sign the contract. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND SHANE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Left Turns . The Transportation Committee report recommended that the matter of . Rainier Ave. S. left turns on, Rainier Ave. be referred to the Administration for appropriate action. .The report noted the Public Works Department is • meeting with the merchants in the vicinity of the Renton Shopping Center on this' matter. MOVED .BY SHANE, SECOND PERRY, COUNCIL CON- CUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION: OF THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE . CARRIED. , Councilman Stredicke noted proposed removal of no-left turn prohibi- tion in the area of K-Mart and the Community Bank in Rainier Ave. S. Prevention Councilman Stredicke• inquired of City building regulations to pre- Street Water vent damage ,to property located below street level from water run off, - Rijn Off such as occurred on Talbot Hill in the vicinity of the Lobe property. . Damage Stredicke objected to -waiving of off-site improvements and discussion and' ensued as to authority of the Board of Public Works, Hearing Examiner Off-Site and Council ; Public Works Gonnason explained the Board of Public Improvements Works can grant deferral up to two years formore appropriate timing on installation, but does not grant exceptions to the sub-division ordinance. Stredicke noted drainage claims on, agenda. MOVED STRED-ICKE, SECOND THORPE, REFER MATTER TO THE UTILITY COMMITTEE AND ADMINISTRA- TION. CARRIED. Park and Ride Councilwoman Thorpe inquired of• the flooding of the Park 'and Ride Lot lot at Burnett Ave. and was advised by the Public Works Director . of contractor's pumps lowering water in manholes, noting monitoring . could be done. • . Master Plan MOVED BY PERRY,. SECOND THORPE, THE CITRUST DEVELOPMENT MASTER PUD' PUD 207-78 BE REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA FOR PRESENTATION AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. Citrust The Hearing Examiner's decision of 8/15/78 recommended approval ' Development subject to conditions of.request of Citrust Development Corp. Victoria Hills for approval of proposed 62-acre Planned, Unit Development consist- . ing of 144 single family .homesites- on 44 acres of land and 193 . . multiple family residences on 18 acres. The report listed total of . 337 dwelling .units on. the overall site with density of 5.4 dwell- ing_uni;ts per, acre :for, property, located between Benson Rd. S. and 1,10p Renton City Council 43/21/78 Page 4 , Old Business - Cont. Environmental Letter from Mr Dave Biggar, President, Kennydale Community Club Impact requesting_the' City Council to consider area concern to minimize , the adverse environmental impact of currently planned and future housing develoPPents throughout Renton, especially Kennydale. Councilman Perry noted Highgate matter and appeal will be before council September 11. Planning and Development Committee will be reviewing ThurOay, August 24. Mr. Dave Biggar noted for residences of Kennydale that all interested persons are invited to attend Thurs Committee meeting. MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHANE TO REFER LETTER TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT.COMMITTEE. CARRIED. . Requirements for Letter from Mr. Dave Biggar, President, Kennydale Community Club Hook-Up to re requirements to 'hookup' to sanitary sewers. MOVED BY SHANE, Sanitary Sewers SECOND SHINPOCH TO REFER TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Substitute, motion by Thorpe to refer to Planning and Development Committee. Motion failed for lack of second. Environmental Petition with 93 signatures re environmental impact protesting the Inpact Petition environmental 'declaration of Non-Significance' as recommended by the Land Use Hearing, Examiner re proposed Highgate Development and requested public hearing to discuss state of environmental impact. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND THORPE TO REFER ,TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Proposed Policies Letter from Joan A. Walker, Chairman Planning Commission presented Element Statement proposed Policies Element statement of the Comprehensive Plan as Prepared and recommended for adoptton by the Planning Commission. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND CLYMER TO REFER TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Upon commendation by council Ms. Walker noted the great deal. of time spent by the Planning Commission,staff, and community. Request re Councilman Stredicke requested recommendation from the Public Works City Owned Director on the disposition of city owned property and pumping static Property on Jones Ave. near 20th St., and plans for use or development. City Councilman Stredicke complimented the adMinistration for placing Spending a freeze on the city spending at this time. Rules and MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND THORPE THAT MATTER OF RULES GOVERNING Ordinances COUNCIL MEETINGS, INSTEAD OF ORDINANCES BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND Governing MEANS COMMITTEE: CARRIED. . MOTION BY CLYMER, SECOND THORPE TO Council Meetings ALSO REFER SUBJECT TO CITY ATTORNEY. CARRIED. , Water System MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND TRIMM TO SUSPEND RULES AND HEAR AT THIS TIME Inter-ties THE CORRESPONDENCE RE WATER SYSTEM INTER-TIES WITH KENT AND TUKWILA. CARRIED. Letter from Warren EC. Gonnason, Director of Public Works, requesting approval of water system inter-ties with Kent and Tukwila to meet requirements for appropriate fire flow in the Benaroya Busini Park Development on SW 43rd St. Motion by Shane, Second Perry to concur in recommendation of Public Works Director. Mr.. Gonnason explained facilities will be constructed by the Benaroya Co. , but will be faciltties of the City of Renton, jointly operated by the cities of Renton, Kent, and Tukwila. Councilwoman Thorpe inquired as to cost, staff time involved, and who will maintain. Mr. Gonnasoi explained request by Benaroya to be reimbursed for part of the facilities, and will be relatively maintenance free with the agree- ment providing for the costs, to be shared by the city's involved. Councilwomap:ShinOoch noted request is only for an agreement to be drawn up. Asst. City Attorney, Kellogg, advised council of implica- tions of approving agreement without details. Councilman Clymer inquired if the work had started on the'project. Mr. Gonnason noted detailed plans have been prepared with no construction at this time. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHINPOCH TO REFER TO MATTER T( WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE WITH CONSULTATION WITH CITY ATTORNEY. CARR' T 1 - 41010 AO P k, 1111011 - ,,, v. TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL � iu . ca" RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 2 V�� 0'' -� 200 MILL AVE., SO. , ' V,,..4 � t�F��G�ti RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 0 °� s°� S``� TITLE: PROPOS» .'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE• WALL &�F EDEKOP CORP �+ REFERENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184-78, E-185-78, ECF-356-78 C' elf SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: mil/ I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do legally reside in the City of -i: - Renton-, and do hereby PROTEST THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION, OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore request that • the City assume the following responsibilities: ' 1.• Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance' from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC 197 10-375. 2: Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need for a detailed, comprehensive .'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC-197-10-480. . • % • 3. Extend the Public Hearing to 'approve th Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for •, 1978, accordingly. DATE NAME *please print- SIGNATURE ADDRESS I ' 4 / EPA 11* A''as- rS..QinfAVI_) . \ki"0-. 1 ) () 5 A.:E:g3 v- 57 / 3 4 L 0 ys Hp c Kim & 'i 616., giaag__,---K- 1 r r h-c- . 4 , FA, 0,,,, ,,,cie J411-6_1(ng €4,k„,,,,6 Ali , meg 1,,,,b,,,,, az, wA- el cf g „�oai „T ign2 t i'ill�= � J /�WGotd E z)/ A . g/t5 "5 17-74/-A it P • "/: ' LNc d2 - eV I ak '(--e-il' M 1).-/i3afrti5/4a) ,6, 7/iSbe 6Z-OFF Lig/VD/_5 ..,.. e4i/c;z44,,,,,Z i?.?...e/ ni.67, Z,C)7:k 7 qi i-76 a„ hard ` it 4cu,AdQ„' Izaq L , ._,Dig-9--. itt s/ -gT5 1611(1, - (5 is c o U L— ,I,, ppy ems.,. --3 - a b il, .11511() Auto LE-6 Ok_410_ W , _ L a (a er1z A ,w t 33� q 01-5`Pe %) NA A ' //L3-45GA/ / .A )i (1- dam)114 2b • PLIITION TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE., SO., RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 • TITLE: PROPOSED .'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION REFERENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184-78, E-185-78, ECF-356-78 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: . I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we). do legally reside .in the City of Renton, and do hereby PROTEST!THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION, OF NON.-SIGNIFICANCE.: AS RECOMMENDED BY THE. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore request that . the City assume the following responsibilities:. 1c. Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental. Non-significance' . from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC' 197- 10-375. • 2. Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need for a detailed, comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC-197-10-480. . .- • 3. Extend the. Public Hearing to 'approve the Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for August 28, 1978, accordingly. DATE NAME *please print' SIGNATURE . ADDRESS . d6///Avh 0- V0/1 h30,'1 �).,G.i 40, 4P1A�v , P°.Z6a c-0o . s 1,3 vp3lis 1..eis AA, ,cS O.1-k A) 9 0 CO Seat:I:DIA T>.o "e'OK .2-6“.;KC-6-/TOPiti 1 , / jZ.fr/ /-oWiq .. Lb e to /s- c oti L)4s C, • (43eF- tAg c,co,h5kp Pb V1�-Iv D 12 317 2 C Qs s U 3��„�. �-/�. 1. '2 8/3/7 g ;l n -.s�e1-- ,� ,� ag( I /q 4,r, (2)-0 . / ?LI3 -78 of R C110 i A bq A'L=s t, If 33 a : ,,, a bL • 1, g"-l 3-7 Q R �� S1c �.�- � - /qa cfg--)3-?V 2 2 J /y e- t/j � �• N SI �- . ahlt, • 173 ),(1.,<, .;22P---t 4111P • • PETITIO11 TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE., SO., RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 TITLE: PROPOSED 'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION • RY,F';RENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184-78, E-185-78, ECF-356-78 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT- I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do legally reside in the City of Renton, and do hereby PROTEST THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION, OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE_ AS RECOMMENDED BY THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore request that • the City assume the following responsibilities: - 1.. Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance' from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC 197- . 10-375. • 2 Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need for a detailed, comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC-197-10-480. 3. Extend the Public Hearing to 'approve the Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for August 28, 1978, accordingly. DATE NAME *please print SIGNATURE ADDRESS W L - t 5- 7 g u o c L A-aJ N ' '--o- �/v�-,J 7)8 Yl a. `-' . Po' 'A( (1, C 4 Ago-- S 2 S" 11,4rLe,02 4 .,/ejae. ApA-94 62;ar, ey4 / 1g 41 J /c:7f, OA- ratE5 r�, 8U# D U 5tioi •, i� � /vim / . ". > A, tosj; - 4 47 ,E .co. d fq1 • h � 5/ 7V 00a 4 o 10,/ {X bcLjk 416 DAvloif1 Al AO, PETITION 41010- TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE., SO., ' RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 TITLE: PROPOSED 'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, 'KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION - REFERENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184--78, E-185-78, ECrF-356-78 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT_ I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do legally reside in the City of Renton-, and do hereby PROTEST THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION\ OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE..:. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore request that the City assume the following responsibilities:,. 1.. Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance' from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC' 197- 10-375• • 2, Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need for a detailed, comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC-197-10-U80.' 3. Extend the Public Hearing to 'approve the Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for August 28, 1978, accordingly. DATE NAME *please print- SIGNATURE- ADDRESS _ 14//7g ,QVe b c51. %?31664 a • 476 4,1? Larite_ 4166-77 tv-7I II 31//6/7( A L e Jc' EN6zi m (4,6LJ ` iC zv, s-33 q 14:1 , G6 169c ) M/iiL, i i��/ '/ / 1 ✓ram'/1. /`/ AL, L - 70 / d r -,)(a'tk, Mumik 44- al Al Iv- py 4 //'/ r 1 l 7-1- 41 , 0) 16/C_C' feet ,,.r-7/6/ ' , CJ : / Cet. )3,),6%!;-'-("; /7C hARL"--4),,,t-) • • M PETITION M . • e` TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE., SO. , • RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 • TITLE: PROPOSED .'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION. • - REFERENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184-78, E-185-78,• ECF-356-78 • SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do legally reside in the City of Renton-, and do hereby PROTEST:THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION•\ OF NON.-SIGNIFICANCE__ AS RECOMMENDED BY THE. LAND .USE 'HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore_request that. the City assume the following responsibilities:. 10. Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance' • from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC 197- 10-375. . 2. Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need for a detailed, • comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC=197-10-4.80. ' 3. Extend the. Public Hearing to 'approve th'e Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for August 28, 1978, accordingly. DATE ' ' NAME; *please print- - 'SIGNATURE • ADDRESSV .,4\ Nt--Tck: \ic.\1/ 4;),5- an*—4,1 A A) ki thq (7. 7t 9'1110 . /3, /V>'clJ�`s :, 'r , i 71--.5G�'3, /Y© /1-Azr.1,•rz.?/rat L''yv 7 -?? / %I- a t /.5 C /e/7/ )'a% / l�cram/�^"a'#1 b _ -•`? c Ka'1-7471ze-- , 6_74 Cam, 6 : 1 1 / 1,-)c /i/ /I'-4I _ I c J �/ !�/ • • Jam- �- • S ✓ r . .„,/x;Viz-4- 0-0 • ,4/;0 ./ ,itte//;_i /Sly /77 .ve -?-177 , �' //,/7 (2--/Le.4.-F22/7? M, L1UiO TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE., SO., ' RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 TITLE: PROPOSED 'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION • REFERENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184-78, E-185-78, ECF-356-78 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT,: I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do legally reside in the City of Renton-, and do hereby PROTEST:THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION, OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE_. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore request that the City assume the following responsibilities:. 1.• Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance' from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC 197- 10-375. 2. Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need .for .a detailed, comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC-197-10-480.. - 3. Extend the. Public Hearing to 'approve the Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for August 28,. 1978, accordingly. DATE NAME *please print- SIGNATURE ADDRESS - l7 A- 13R.. p-13- f tim C L/y /3a , 7- /3 0/mea-t,k-- tRidagey ,6744.,&(4 15 " / ` L .emu / o. i � ,ce.I �r /►� cp t 1��d�j �. / ( 4 ,/ //j1 / /OePee-cse -/ ae/z.t, / ,bere. E- #c e fa7 Ai...5.714.57,1 /1424.,,,/ Z/k6m/o- /4K'' 4roeilfi • 'mac '`X/ r C7It %;;), A-). (cam4 l--A; , % M. PET111 . TO:. RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE., SO., ' RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 TITLE: PROPOSED !HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION REFERENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184-78, E-185-78, ECF-356-78 • SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT=' I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do legally reside in the City of Renton-, and do hereby PROTEST.THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION. OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE_. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore request that • the City assume the following responsibilities:. 1.. Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance' from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC'197- 10-375. • • 2. Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need for detailed, comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC-197-10-480. 3. Extend the Public Hearing to 'approve the Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for August 28, 1978, accordingly. DATE NAME *please print- SIGNATURE ADDRESS PAOC , , )7, r. l.7 pr.:,, - l/(C /-te2/L/(_,:MA L I D (f5 .eeJkt C^t PI' 4 • r-7---t4.:1'r AC7e/ 17 civ ( Lay 4),IA; /37.7,2 rdelf,4feA /l (-�lgieZE'� /Ili *-- ((;) '1 -K'?—/j/ G-{G, 5 .5- g&-:',0'4./, 1 /l '"Q 1//1 /i. I l CO cJ 14-5 ={v� ( 04..,._�_ 22 0 %' ELV I-Lv e 75 /VU r hi C= (O,jj c- ►'1S, n-,9,n r I .i k o At>a y/(n 1I. 4` 11. OS TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE., SO., RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 TITLE: PROPOSED 'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION • R 7ERENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184-78, E-185-78, ECF-356-78 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do, legally reside in the City of Renton, and do hereby PROTEST THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION, OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE_ AS RECOMMENDED BY THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore request that the City assume the following responsibilities: ' 1.. Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance' from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC 197- 10-375. • 2. Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need for a detailed, comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC-197-10-480. 3. Extend the Public Hearing to 'approve the Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for August 28, 1978, accordingly. DATE NAME *please print SIGNATURE ADDRESS ��--14°78 , �>c>cy n;^✓✓�= /;Gi�rsat`` L�/ �., r Pau1 R 33 �,� e v,„. �l�`133 honesiRehet7 `N' �. 3-1 yN4ncy-78 I-. �Ya ► 4n7"on W 2 y3s ALA. S S A, ReX to S!=K t—G^r��v-� f cf c-s-! p5/7 c.7e5 vEs Ace-, g-JSl-7g ,St94)D219 6Qtl e-4- r ,14 � �� G' z) q' g So /b5 77 /47 L .rpd yz�r ►,PTy /�. � z�J gc Aviazi,m,e4,-,A /I* pc/vm, A,„2_ Apure °" C: �,1lXQ4 i ' zrm sJ' ,A. frJFA6 Ae ,04 • • • . PETITIOH TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE., SO., ' • RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 TITLE: PROPOSED 'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION • FRENCES: PP-284-78 & PP-184-78, E-185-78, ECF-356-78 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do legally reside in the City of Renton, and do hereby PROTEST THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION, OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE. AS RECOMMENDED BY THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, and furthermore request that • the City assume the following responsibilities: 1.. Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance'from the Washington State Department of Ecology -pursuant to #WAC 197- 10-375. • • 2. Create a Public Hearing to further discuss the need for a detailed, comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' -pursuant to #WAC-197-10-480. - - 3. Extend the Public Hearing to 'approve the Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently scheduled for August 28, 1978, accordingly. DATE NAME *please print SIGNATURE • ADDRESS Yq4--2r/lW S 7""A alb/,djYa-ietc-. /F/gek-(444,164,24 " Ovhg/ Axe // „4. i// /Tip p 8F- .0.0e( s'2‘)--ekte' /Xed-frpee-eer 2-44 . f 5 7k L A A Zj 1_1)i= O 1,(,) Qau � j7.2 4�G�Gc 1TH . 0 i TO: RENTON CITY COUNCIL RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING • 200 MILL AVE., SO., RENTON, WASHINGTON, 98055 • 0 TITLE:. PROPOSED .'HI-GATE' DEVELOPMENT, KENNYDALE; WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION - REFERENCES: PP-284-78 & ,PP-184--78, E-185-78, ECF-356-78 SUBJECT: . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT I (we), the undersigned, declare that I (we) do legally reside in the City of • Renton, and do hereby PROTEST:THE ENVIRONMENTAL 'DECLARATION, OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE._ AS RECOMMENDED B:Y THE. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER, 'and furthermore' request that the City assume the following responsibilities:: 1.•.. Withdraw the current 'Declaration of Environmental Non-significance' • from the Washington State Department of Ecology .-pursuant .to #WAC•197- 10-375.. . 2; Create' a Public Hearing to further. discuss the need for a detailed, • - comprehensive 'STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT'. -pursuant to #WAC=197-10-480. 3. Extend the Public.Hearing to 'approve the Final Plat Application' by the developer, currently. scheduled. for 'August 28,. 1978, accordingly. • • DATE NAME *please print- SIGNATURE- . ADDRESS . 9j �G 7 • - "4-4/41 s.S L., Ssk' • . /*/A • 0. , , @CC% h. woe) • 73 -f t -6� •fogy-7P-F i' '(i- t P a��ti�/� /74 i4 , . . 111' . , „ l ,... te a ,, ,,,, , ,e, Lz ,,,, zos vtEEN4Toka-co-( LIM'T.4 7 „I • ' 1'i. ' :IV --- • - :: -_•.-,- PAM I . Si • - . . '. Z•.•_ z t- C.,.2 119 Za4 • • .- ..**-----(-- -. N. ', .1. ...,'• „ ‘...---L- 4 I> ' - 1 r —-,--'5"-.' : . .. . \`:4•\ i ': --- ::rt-..--,--• . • i. 4 2 : . —, --•.r.f.. s:,.f. . ••• . '41 ,. ...1-141 iihWil.-', ' . ''''.,?7,•. _I.1,_ . '•I . . _...:„.....r .. • „, -.1•• ,,,_2_1r...k.. 1 i .___ t* -- -1 w' Z.". .SZ .: ..3 ...1 .. .../ .....• ..5. ••-,-? .'. . -vim _l_r4,...r.— •• ;(1, \\N\ : .\ \ ____ . . , . . .• • ' • - . : .I.I • 4ir•!- . ,• '' •--N1i\-;- i i1 , 3 - ;.,.,•, : :•'. . :.-.C. --, ..- :,F , 42i !•! ..4,.....21.iii gal.r,.i i.l,.c.L..,.......!11 i._.,_..,i,,-t.T'-:1,..$.s1-•,_- .-._1.L-. 1 a - .a.._ \_ : - . ' : li-\ \ 1 1 . J5 24 _ r \ 1 '•7-4.-,%-,I,,—,',.7--4i--ik1 f-, -,•1,.•••••.\,, r Z G IMIND 7200 _:, 1,..)3 '.1154 2 ti: r.,,..!' i. ...... . 4..!•••„ --4arjlitinirrt . ..L _ • . . _ . . on I ' I N " • ' ' : ' • '' ' ; 4.1..a a.....s . :, . i•,,;k. ..., 15 \ NI .. .) •• v•••P : 3 • ti '-'1,4:6:-- ' ., , / ' • : ) , / : ' z, . „4 , : • , . Li., zo6 i'N.,: ....• . - ' .., • ,• *1\I MI / 192 ZoS ' o 0 i ..,a ,0....s• - . I....- ivf.:4.1_,..s..,..,,e„,! , 1: ,•,..., . .. . , lu • •. . . . ir..ot • ii•.. . ,:i•. - , _;.;..4•11,1 ,-,-(...,,L.:1 .. . . . ., . . 1 \1.4 , , - ; .4 i'l•S r..k.-.,iitS-5.-1. - ' * .\‘'- 110 •"•.:,.-'7•1••1 --• Z l• ** ZO5 . • .......... \ \ SC‘, (.3.• 3., i Z 84 1. ' t4 .l' 1!--ki •--1:±..4-''l 7--•*-- ;',••••••NA • ci.L.,i•• • . ' . . ii,' ' 'I\ • ' . * I 1? ' ! c. *:JLi kOT. tail, \ t i.Sti83-EGT . .. ,i A \\,^. • . , . '. d 'i •1'. %.••-•• . •, S ITE •0 • •• i. • 'i• '' 'oc 4.• a sv . r •':', r'' ' I- •/ : .....J "•'., ...•' '°.. • •.„',• '' ,tr. '4/.1 c.:111,;'it J •: 13 4 . r : " ' 13-3 • ..„ , .• _ . -t, it • I ' • , /...f; rr ......17-„, , i tRe I11,5 pi:.,f• ,',.' (4, e 4 r, . .,,.' .,,,, ?,• i, a .....I...-- 1.; , • . , • : :r:. _ ,,. -,, 7' 13 E A•L.Vi • . • • I •,r ..... • ,,, , • • • • •,---- - , .• t, . . .... .4 11111 --. 11 , RLI 1- - ' ' ' ...' : r G-71 001 , . n 4 • ,..., : . _.., ,• .., . .., R-3 ' "I ' •i 14 ' j;',, . • „, I• 00,,,• \ • •• .4 `• ‘....--.-A. .11,., • r,.., % R3 , ..1.. , ! ; / dal* 1 --,----"---- \ •••- i. f . • •-• '''N ., ....V. . I . i\ , ,, . , . / 1 •. • '..--....i p-Itt-: d., ‘ . , IA1,0/ . f ••• ! ' (. : • .... - ' "7"-1 • • •'• . 'P.: \ "z,• % •46 . A ',.4 i . ...I.%Nil... , . . WALL AND REDEKOP .CORP. (HI-GATE) - Files PP-284-78 and E-185-78 • , -........... . ..., • ,6 APPLICANT Wall & Redekop Corp. (Hi-gate) TOTAL AREA ±9. 8 acres : :,. PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 20th Street and N.E. 16th Street EXIS-1ING ZONING G-7200 • .,.:•,:':.;' ,g •EXISTING USE Undeveloped . , . .:`'. '1,:).?.1'..• . . PROPOSED USE R-1 Single Family Residence • _ . . : . . . . '144•:1 :,'-',:• : ' COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN R-1 ' . - . • ' , • . • COMMENTS ' • • ,,. „ :ii.;.. : . 0,...-4.,• : IA • -•. • : .,1,,•I o•.:, y : ' , x ;,..;');;;-:::.•,.:.'," , , , I , '',.., ' '' . • •. 0 ':;,'','- '''', ;'. :.'i , :H ''. ::,''•4•:;•:', ••'•r,',• As ?: : ' , ': .', •;., % . • • • . . , - . , .....1 .- . ..' • , ..,.,',..,•, •:•,,,,,, 4..* r1,, 1,,,i,, ,,,-i•'..,;',,-0•;,..,„', • ,_,,- , ,..--,• ,. • • ...,,,, 1 ' • ' • ., '••.•• ••;•,1 ',;: ,;.,•••••'•:„'l;,i 1:,•; '1:;;;'ll'i • •:';•: : : ,f,,,::•.;,; ' 1 :,..;•?••42;:,.,,,A;,1•j,if'. :•: ,•••$:.• ••: ••I''.• . • '.••.',.;:•.';''.• ' •,:•: ', ; ' •". ' :. ,•• :`...: '••,;.•:.''''' ';'•,••;''':•:'•.:.;:: . • " ; ' ••';' •2''•••:•,•1" 1; 4;'f•;''•.'•11''',•:•,,I.:''•-•';J•,•-. .4,1••:1.••;0).•:,;;`:::••;,4;;;,:*,'•,f`r,;,-••,1,1:' Lik41':'?..(:('•••i;;;.•• ••_;•Y•,::':'.:';'•,''.• ::.••••;:' •:::::••'••\ .: .. • :'' :; .:' • ' ' '••: ' ; '-•; ;L: ,'••;•:,''''.' :'• ' '• • • '1.:;` : •'....;•'':'''';';: i'•'''1%''C''?A.'1':'•;;M'I''.;''.''''• f';I:C!'•f•':''11 •Yi,•27•;';'•_!'.‘?;';?...'4,i; ,^41.11.,'' �. ... Renton City Council 9/11/7S Page ,2 r" Hi-Gate Development , - -Continued • Councilman 'Stredicke 'inquired•for :Clarification of the record and •x;` ;`, • audience whether committee recommendation"s were .in keeping with • also as regards sewe • the recommendations..of =the .Hearing •Examiner. r -.' line,, being. advi,sed .by>",Commi•ttee: Chairman, Perry, that committee . , . ' report'.i s'. :l l:i n full agreement.:• Councilwoman Thorpe inquired ,whether:-; • k:'sewer 11 ne:, installation in'.the''Hi=Gate plat Was finalized, noting -:,;, - . cost information for':NE.:16:th'`St; as opposed to NE 20th instal 1ation.' '.!, . :," Public Works Director Gonnason explained costs of. the two locations ., ,. •' ; noting.NE: 16th' would'be:�con'si derabl-y more expensive "for the deve.l"oiler, ' however,. •noted .1ess ,cos=tly'. to.`'the "City to. operate pumping at Jones,- ;.: .. - •• ' - Ave.; Tine 'rather than 'NE•,16th• "due to shorter di stance and lower • • ., " pumping. head.. Councilwoman Thorpe further inquired re stability and',.:.,, . '`;:; maintenance of line via blueberry ,farm rather than ...on 16th and was - advised -that`no'problems':are'forseen by .the .Public Works Director:'.: • .•: . Councilwoman Thorpe 'requested: comments be included i n the record.:,-,_ •" for assistance at-'..time :o.f;fi:nal:.,p'lat approval . ' Councilman Perry - - ":,repor.ted„that sewers,,,.''.for;,thi;s area`•.are in the planning "stage and " :;. •. ' subject :to :change to either -NE •1,6th or NE. 20th (being confirmed' by . .the••Public, Works Director) and Perry" further -requested inclusion in the- record': •. . • ,. , • Dana ,,Back;ie.1 .�1:835,.:NE:'20th,: explained``bei.ng a,-renter on the property;:." _.;•, to� be developed for: Hi=Gate: and'.•asked.',when bulldozing of the proper '' • - r• , :- ty cou•ld,-commence;, 'being.i".advi sed::,by 'the Public Works Di rector that. ." -'; ";;;;__,�s • would;,be developer's;;~"determination,:. suggesting not. prior to 30 days.. �:,;,,; OLD .BUSINESS." ' Transportation Transportation. Committee •Chairman •S,hi:npoc'h presented report ' Committee Report recommending award' of contract 'for LID •No. 302,. Lind Ave. ,• to. F: LID-.302 L•i,nd 'Ave •Fran k".'.Co.lu,ccio: Con'struction''Co , l..ow•.bi"dd"er, in the amount of :`: :`,•• -i,; ;. Contr • act.Award .,; $3• ,761 ;:6.33`.85:: :;;:T•he`'�rreport further. :recommended:the Mayor and City ,; .'w Clerk be.authorized-to„-,-sign• the.`"contr.• act. , 'MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND ii'., ' ' SHANE.; COUNCIL, CONCUR-,IN:"COMM'ITT'EE:',RECOMMENDATION'. CARRIED:" .,:`° Left Turns •' - , ;: , :„They Trans p ortation::Committee .re" o,rt- recommended that •the. matter'of,;:,,,/ ' Rainier':Ave.,- S:: . 1 eft 'turns;orl=Rainier Ave• ° be:"r'efe.rred to the Administration for _ ', • appropri ate 'action- :; :,4The';"re:port noted the Public Works Department-HI s ;',': :-'°,< - ;. meeti"n with. the :m,e1rchants :tp, •th'e:�vic'i"ni:ty• of.'the Renton Shopping. ' ```• ` „ Center,on this'.:matter MOVED°'B.Y,°SHANE;:'SECOND PERRY,, COUNCIL: CON.=:;-: _ �.4'':' CU.R:IN:;THE.:.RECOMMENDATION.;:OF':;:THE;'T:RANSPORTAT ION ,COMMITTEE.. CARRIED: ' ' `"';'" _. Councilman',"Stredi,cke' noted .proposed::remo.va_l, :of;: no-left .turn prohibi- tion,:•'in:'the area:of::K Ma•r.t. and`••:"the;.‘Communi"ty:'-Bank in Rainier Ave,:: $ ,:::=;:'";,' :;'. .Prevention • Council man"S'•tredicke:' thq.ui'.red'`"of>::C1;ty buiidi'ng''regu1ations to pre- Street :Water,"; vent:.dama9e4to property: lo'ca;ted :be:low;.str.eet level -from water„ run .�;o.ff�•; ;:.; " Run Off'. • .such as :.o.ccur'red, on. Talbot #ii l 1, in3 the:::Vicinity. of the Lobe property - Damage S<tr.edit:ke''=objected':•to"..wa"iv:ing; •of off-site".improvements and discu'ss'i'on:.',:- ,' .• • and . - = ensued' a's;';tau�th o : ori;ty;,of;;,the,:Boar:d:of 'Public ,Work's Hearing Examiner;;.��: :'‘ Off-Site•. . and .Council ;-:.Publ-i.c` Works':_ .Gonnason explained :.the' Board of Public . ' " . Improvements :.,' + _- Worksca,n--:: rant'rdeferral nup; •to:::tw .ys. •fo,r• more appropriate '.timi-n"g;,x', '4:.;;,;.' 9 ,, oe:ar- on' ; nstallation, but doest..;not.;grant 'exceptions'"to the .sub-divi'sion':''' {' :ordinance. S,tred:i.cke not ed:.drainage: claims';on.:"agenda MOVED,•S.TRED;ICKE4�=:�: • :_; ';. SECOND THORPE,: ,RE'FER :MAT-TER1.nTO THE'.UTIL I'TY: .COMM'I`TTEE AND ADMIN:ISTRA .:, „ T :ION: •AR RI E Y C D. !Park'and •Ride. ' Councilwoman'•Thorpe'i'n U.t.iled..,",Of :the:floodin•' of the Park and Ride •Lot .• lot at Burnett Ave:,'""and was advised ',by the Public Works Director-"•-;:,;.-,.:, :`,'.- ••of.:contra�ctor's: pumps°:'; low::eri;n,g' water•:-•i7n:manholes- noting monitoring'. ::,, ';,, ,'. , could. be -.done:y4 , Master: 1 an � `-" MOVED„:BY;. ERY �,`.SE OTORPE�=: `THE -. IRUSTDEVELPMENT MASTER •PUD 20,7-78" • - BE REMOVED "FROM:THE"`AGENDk,FOR PRESENTATION AT"THIS TIME. CARRIED'. `" rl , C.i•trust The Hearing; Examiner's decision-,:of. 8/115/78 recommended approval ,,;, ; :p,:: .• ' Development :• ''subject.:to •condi.tions:of. r:equest•"of:Ci•trust:"Development,. Corp. ;";"{' 'N'`• Vi'.c•tori:a •Hi'lls: : for,•,approva1 of','p'r.opos:ed '62-a`cre',Planned Unit`•Development consist . ? :`= -, „': .:in -"of)-1'44; sin le;:-.famil` ="homes.i;,tes •on 44' acr.es of" land and `193' ' '' g":: 9. y multi `l''e',famil -'re''s;isdences :on-i'18::'ac'res:'•The :'report listed 'total of '';;, :-',: • p y.• p .33,7-..„dwelsl`'.�n§ u� n:'t :,,on,th.e: oerall si,te"with densi't of 5.4 dwell ,, i n :"�un:iper-�.acre:: for>,' r o ert 1o'cated betweer .:.6e s on Rd. S. and- .: :'•�.=� �f ' Sl '' r� !11, , lu": 'i. , ,nip, : t'I.:rv.. `a i • PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT SEPTEMBER 11, 1978 RE : Appeal of Hearing Examiner Recommendation Hi-Gate Preliminary Plat File No . PP-284-78 and Exception No. E-185-78 The Planning and Development Committee, after examination of the record and the Hearing Examiner 's written decision, findings , and conclusions pursuant to Section 4-3017 , recommends that the City Council concur in the recommenda- tion of the Hearing Examiner and refer the item to the Ways and Means Committee for proper resolution or ordinance preparation. George Perry, Chairman • Barbara Shinpoch • Patricia Seymour-Thorpe 4OV R�- v - •� o THE CITY OF RENTON `$ ell 2 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 z 011) • CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER p L.L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 441. bSEP1 August 4, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. PP-284-78, E-185-78; Wall & Redekop Corp. (Hi-Gate) . Dear Council Members: A request for reconsideration on the referenced application was received by the Examiner on August 1, 1978. The matter has been reviewed and a response, dated August 4, 1978, has been transmitted to all parties of record. All correspondence regarding this request is attached. If additional requests for reconsideration or appeals are not received regarding the application, the 14-day appeal period will expire on August 18, 1978, and the matter will be placed on the City Council agenda on August 28, 1978. A typographical error on the Planning Department staff report has resulted in reference to the application by two different file numbers, PP-184-78 and PP-284-78. Both of these file numbers apply to the same application and a memorandum of clarification will be placed in the permanent file. If you require additional information or assistance regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincere,_ C L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Of 1;1 �1tract rt • o T I E CITY O F RENTON a4- MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 or, � �sacrst • .., p ". CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR $ LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER Q- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 0 4FD SEP1E�6 • August 4, 1978 Mr. Dave. Biggar, President Kennydale Community Club . P.O. Box 2242 Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. PP-284-78, E-185-78; Wall & Redekop Corp. (Hi-Gate) . Dear Mr. Biggar: Your letter of July 28, 1978, contained several issues, some of which are within the scope of my responsibility and others should be addressed to other departments or the City Council. The following will address your requests or indicate to whom the requests should be directed. The questions regarding the existing Comprehensive Plan should be directed to the City Council and/or the Planning Commission. Specifically, the Hearing Examiner Ordinance precludes the Examiner from considering or initiating changes to the Comprehensive Plan. A. copy of your letter was forwarded to the Planning Department for review with the purpose of providing you with the necessary contact to request changes to the Comprehensive Plan. I would also refer you to the Planning Director regarding your questions of the environmental checklist and determination of negative impact of the proposal. This city official, not the Examiner, is responsible for the environmental review of proposals within the city. Your concerns regarding storm drainage, as I mentioned in the public hearing, should be addressed to the Public Works Department. The preliminary plat is at issue, and as such, the storm drainage plan is in the preliminary stage of review by that department. One new item of information was presented in your letter which was reasonably available at the public hearing that "water rights" exist on the existing stream which the developer intends to use for release of controlled and filtered storm water run-off. I have forwarded this information to that department to provide you with the initial contact for you to follow up to provide whatever other specific related information that may assist that department in review of the final drainage plan. As I mentioned in the public hearing, the applicant must apply for a final plat prior to construction of homes on the individual lots. The final plat requires another public hearing during which you and anyone else will have the opportunity to review and' comment upon the proposal. Pursuant to this hearing, I will make 'a recommendation to the City Council who ultimately will make the final decision on the final plat. The issue was raised of the legality of the annexation, Ordinance No. 1818, since the City Attorney did not "approve" it. While the City Attorney may wish to ultimately clarify this question, I feel confident in stating that his approval is not necessary. Normally, that "approval" merely attests to approval of the form of the ordinance. Approval of the annexation rests solely with the City Council. ' Mr. Dave Biggar Page Two August 4, 1978 Regarding the public notice given for the public hearing, I found that the record substantiated, as did your letter, that the notice complied with applicable state law. This issue was not raised in the public hearing. Those who spoke at the hearing appeared to be adequately prepared to testify. The City Council is reviewing sewer connection requirements as a result of the proposed extension of the sewers by the developer to the preliminary plat. This policy decision rests with the Council, not the Examiner. In summary, I could find insufficient information in your letter to justify reconsideration of my recommendation. Your information was forwarded to the appropriate departments for review and your pursuit thereof. Please contact these departments and follow up on your points and information. I would also recommend that you request the Planning Department for notification as early as possible of receipt of the final plat application for your review in that office prior to the public hearing. This would provide you with additional lead time to prepare testimony. An additional appeal period has been established upon transmittal of this letter to expire on August 18, 1978. 'Due to the length of the request for rcooncidcration, copicc -have not been attached but will remain on file in the Examiner's office. Sincerely, L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: City. Attorney Planning Director Public Works Director City Council Parties of Record KE�.. YDALE COr^ UNITY � LUD • RENTON WASHINGTON • • incorporated ter �ra J:,ly 2'i, 1Wa r tabst b • CITY OF RENTON NEARING EXAMINER . L. i-tick ±eeler. AUG Land Use Hearing Examiner Alt �� f* Renton Munici.pal building 200 Mil': Avenu ,. aout:1 :Renton, Washington, 98055 r TITLE: Hi-Gate Development; Wall & Redekop Corporation SUbJsCT: Public Appeal to: 1. Reconsider Land Use Hearing examiner's decision of July 25, 1978. 2. Provide detailed Declaration of Environmental Impact, REF RENCES:File No. PP-284-78, No. i;-185-7a, Preliminary Report; public hearing . of July 11 , 1978, and Environmental Checklist No. ECF-356-78, July 3, 1978. Dear Mr. Beeler: As the current President of the t(ennydale Community Club, I have been authorized to request that your office take immediate action to accomplish the following: 1 . Re-evaluate your recommendation of July 25, 1978 to approve the subject Preliminary Plat. We contend that your decision was based on erroneous, inaccurate, and/or incomplete information which has led to many note- wert.":y 'errors in fact, and judgement' . 'Errors of law' seems to be a etr.,ng possibility - if it follows the trend already set by the afore- :Lentiori d; this. item .s crren ly being researched. 2. :'v honor our appeal to reconsider the validity of the 'Final Declaration uc ;hon-significance' (Envorrun<:r.ta.l .Impact) submitted, and provide a comprehensive Envir'un(ut'sital impact Statement. I might .suggest that this study be accomplished by an impartial agency(s), and/or institu- tion(:;). • the property owners of Kenny:iai.e (and all of Renton) have good reason to be ;oncerned. it is quite obvious that this project will 'set the stage' , if not contested, for cascading mistrust of municipal procedures, officials, and general_ arati'iy. It is the obligation of this Community Club to provide residents with th awareness of the fact that large developers are .going to 'rape' this area -without regard :'or the quality of life we now enjoy, and the City of Renton Is condoning the same. The City is now using these developments as leverage L- force improvements, such as sewers on property owners who neither require nor desire the same, and then quickly turn around and extract assessments from them to fund further intrusions on the rights of the unaware: without the benefi o the property owners' basic right to form an L.I.D. , and/or protest the sane by majority action. There are two basic problems that have been uncovered by the Hi-Gate matter. The ne: nydale Community Club intends to_ pursue an equitable solution for the good DC the Community (while still a part of Renton); and all of Renton (unfortunately, it's too late for some areas -like Talbot Hill; a wasteland of • rJot':, and pavement) . The two basic problems are as follows: • J . 1 . The Ci ty's Conprehc ve Plan aiunt to rev: ;ed to inc le new municipal „',fide-lines for all developments neared to minimize the adverse impact on the environment. It is suggested tnat the Planning Division take immediate steps , , to consider the following: a) Rezoning all large uz deveiueed oruper"j i es currently zoned 'G-7200 • • in Kennydale to 'a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet (approx. 1/2 acre lots), and appropiate modifications throughout the City. . This would automat_caily iin't the density of future housing, improve the,qua Lity of the same, and Grevi! e reasonable aesuraces (at the discretion of the new ereperty owners of course) that the environ- mental impact to the area would be minimized. b) Limit developments to a 'Cluster' type housing arrangement, with • considerable emphasis on 'green-belt and/or 'untouched' areas. • c) • No large developments in Kennydale. 2. The City Council should take positive action for the good of the people by 'filling the loop-holes' that now make it possible for unpopular and unwanted improvements, along with the associated financial burdens and other hardships on the people. The City should not be allowed to take advantage of 'windfall' situations such as. the planned Hi-Gate development to impose so-called improvements on exinting •residents that are quite obviously, and historically, not warranted nor wanted; refer to the sound defeat of L.I.D. 296, 1975, to sewer upper Kennydale. This matter is not .Lila'.ted to just sewers. The City should not consider, •nor validate any local improvement except as a result, of a bonafide petition for an L.I.D., or some other legal • mandate which clearly indicates a 'majority' of property owners concern. WE Rc:'. UE3T CLriitiF ICATION. OF THE FOLLOWING 'FACTS AND FIGURES' THAT WE DEEM • ERRONEOUS, Ml::LhADING, INCOMPLETE, AND IRRi!.3PONSIBD , WHICH HAVE BEEN EXTRACTED FROM THE. PRELIMINARY REPORT :SUBMITTED TO YOU BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, DATED ,lULY 11, 1.j7D t ITEM. COMME:;TS/ o BE HiJULVuD . n-i Owner of record? 1'icConriville or hall and Redekop, Corporation? • Does the owner refer.ve the right to remain anonymous? n-10 Notices were posted 10 days prior to the Hearing at three locations, however one (1 ) such notice was posted ( 417 feet ). .from the eastern- most boundary of the proposed site. It was, as of this date (7/29/78), posted on the east side of Aberdeen Ave:, N.E. at 20th. This is certainly not 'on or near' When was the area in question annexed to the City of Renton? .See attachments. • a) A map obtained from the Planning Department clearly indicates "3/17/68", however b) Ordinance No. 1818 states "March 17, 1960" . • c) I see no signature of approval by the City Attorney = is the annexation legal? ITEM Cu7 MENTS /TO BE (cutst l;need) E-1 ERRONEOUS; The site does not 'level off' towards N.E. 20th. -it is,in fact, below 20th. , an as a result has. _standing water on it much • of Lh e year. ;✓'-3 INCOMPLETE; The Site is also cciered by many large trees and food bearing vegetation for the many f s�.r.ms i wildlife present. ABBRE7Ii+TED/INCOMPLETE; This item deserves more than one (1) sentence, • China-Pheasant, quail, Ducks, Raccoon, and Deer inhabit and/or feed on this area. E-5 ERRONEOUS ; Standing surface water is present approx. six (6) months a year. *I would suggest additional testing here, but not following a dry period. C-1 ERROR IN JUDGEMENT (or calculated?) ; Why has the City elected to 'tear-up' • N.E. 20th. , causing much disruption in the process, and disregarding the fact that the installation of approx. ( 912 feet ) of sewer lines and associated hardware could be saved by 'hooking-up' on N.E. 16th. - where sewers are currently in? ERRONEOUS; " and a simil.iar main extends North and South approx. 300 feet West " It should read ( 500 feet ) . 0-3 ERROR; The shortest route to Metro # 142 'stop' from the subject site is ( 1 ,600 feet ), not "800 feet". C-4 ERROR; The shortest (and safest) distance to Hazen Senior High School is ( 2.85 miles ), not "1 1/2 miles". 0-5 ERROR ; The shortest distance to Lake Wash. Beach Park is ( 2.9 .miles ), not "1/2 mile". • J INCvMP't '1' e) What is the "suitable storm water retention" referred? Has a proper desip;n been made? Is it the reported 'spring-fed creek? b) Is it true that torn: water run-off from thirty (30) additional houses and paved streets will be directed to a spring-fed creek? 'sand if so - 1- What Impact will inevitable pollutants' have on the Blue-berry Farm and three (3) adjacent duck ponds? 2- Who will maintain this creek? 3- What steps will be taken to prevent the creek from overflowing? 4- Two, or more 'water rights' are currently in effect on this creek. _Ore party now draws from it to water his vegetable garden. ' -could this pose a possible health hazard, and/or litigation? 5- Approx. 2/3 of the Hi-Gate site is comprised of sandy-type, soil, which adequately absorbs runoff now, but how will the creek and ponds handle the runoff from thirty (30) additional houses and approx. ( 1 ,500 Feet ) of sidewalk and streets later? " CUYME:f2Jlru iSr RhoeLV:.... '• ti: .av? !.',c:i1 . 1`. LiiCOR ECT/Ildi.t!P'trt•ETE; There will be a cenaidera le social impact in this . area. The f;opelatian .a! :10 L>1E with the addition of thirty (30) ho.iseholi.s ; there. are now ( 23 ).. A 7i .._'u( , ve Influence wlii r .,U_.L. the residents of this area feel the • same as most an. Kennyd:.de, that the credab: .ii.ty of their quiet and restful neighborhood, and their peace-of-mind is definet.ely threatened by :Lia intrusion. L It RIS!.'ON.71B ; The 'Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact' in force is totally i.nad.eeeate. N-3 The Traffic Engineering Division has not stated that traffic control will be req'iired. • N-4 The Utilities Division was contacted by residents; it was unaware of a spring-fed creek. *Note: True, the agencies were contacted, but they signed without benefit o{' an Environmental Impact Statement. 0-8 We question the size of the "open space", especially after a reported 'on-site storm water retention and oil 'separation facility (tank)' is .nstalled. Where, if not on the 'open space' , will this facility be located? 'Refer. to Item No. P-6 of the Report. • Will the open space be untduched? • MISC. 1 . L}e :cepa.'ocy of the u7at, map as related to the Blueberry Farni It read:, "240' X 570' "- this is 3.14 acres, The official. plat on t'i .ic with Kink- County lists this parcel in "C.D. Hillman Gar':'.en uI alto, Division 4", dated 1904, "25 j' X 577." - fhi., .Is 3.34 acres. ' fl.e dirfereoce is ( 8,777.1 square feet or .2 acre) - now can this be? MI1C. 2. Many residents eve di_.:.iati:.f'i.rd with the fact that noti.ces. of the Hear ing were : posted late Fr i aai afternoon prior to the extended July 4 huliaay. i'^any were out of town fur this holiday, and when they returned, had less than a week to prepare for the Hearing. Many didn't. 'show' that might have otherwise. • • MISC. 3. Complaints from concerned residents mounted, as the MINUTES -from the JULY 11 HEARING were not made available .for two (2) weeks after the same. . The response from the -City Clerk and, her staff indicated that the 'minutes' were being belt:-up pending the Hearing Examiner's report. WHY? WE HEREBY RE UEST THAT A COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT BE PROVIDED IN ThIS MATTr;R TO SUPERCEDE THE :N x A'i I VE DECILARATION CF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT THAT • HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED - PER 'PHh FOLLOWING: • 1 . Environmental impact to surroundings, wildlife, and residents not adequately addressed and/or 'consid.ered . 2. Ma jo:' i mpac t ' on area .3. Curls i deranl.e eortroversy on thin project. 4. .Req:.ieat, ai,ternati.ves 5. Req a i.re more answers • 6. elline. j-I'oj-c.tcd o;,.it i( :i; ,:(:',0_:.. , ..: ., ? ker 'ln` emer:ts to adjacent ,ropert i .:wirer::. '. Truest g- i.e o . . o creek for storm ,;atE r .-.. ...:Grt:. '. Unanswered traffic iC problems. • :i. Potential. crime .increase. 10. Impact on schools . 11 . Impact WI w i.ld11 fe 1G'. Impact on nat..r'al vegetation, L'E:. U:,1'LE:�> • 13. Noi=e pollution • Air pollution 1=,. erosion 16. Effect of construction period on Well-being of adjacent residences 17. etc. The s.i mple answer to this controversy would be to 'scrap the project' , and others like it, however, as reasonable, but very concerned citizens, we are now looking to ,you for a fair, just, and%cr compatible solution. We also suggest that a • number of alternatives be submItted that indicates serious concern for the adverse impact caused.by rampant, high volume housing development. I mipht add that the Kennydale Community Club will continue to represent the needs of the residents in this area, and look forward to a productive and acc•.. . :.ab_e cor:cTusion of this mailer. , and all the others that will surely follow. Thank you verb; much for your concern, f•1•.:a:,e feel free to write or call me at y !.11 ar.l i -'of, c. :veni.ence. . . Yours truly, We-e--5 Dave tsif-,gar, President Kennydale Community Club P.u. i3ox 2242 Renton, Washington, 98055 Ph. .res. 226-2521 STATE OF_ Wa_ A_ 1 bus. 237-2507 Connty of . King J55. On this_ 31 ct day of _ rn1y ______ ____.___, A. D. 19__ 78, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Wa• • duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared Public in and for the State of _ Dave Biggar t. me known to be the individual__ described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged le. me • t at_._he__signed and sealed the said instrument as,_.___his____free an voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. ' WITNESS rn hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and this 'ertificate above itten. ) ....----- • t . Notary Public in and for the State of Wa. residing at Renton • r Acknowledgment by Individual. Pioneer National Title Insurance Company Form L 28) • • the City or Aenteri, eifeineten, • ••neeein rLatt. territory to the C'Ity , ter the provielone of Chapter 12e ,:+f the i e'er, :. sin 441 t.,14 ts..4 I e.tington. ie.. emends.). e petition in writine re tueetine that certain • torte' Jry : e.tiDettei to the city limits of the City if Hermon. as nereinafter more • eartieeler:N 1-4 tennexed t the City, euia erepered eni itetate. the City • Cler ,r toe of ,;enton n r - ut september 22, 1959, bearing the signatures • ef L11( ...u.tscr:. 07 more than seventyefive per cent (75%) In velue :According to the aseeneee fur eenerel taxetiari of the territory for Tahich eruuncation is • putitiente! eerein, ehich petition acts forth the legal deaeription or the preearty eer....r tire; to governmentel legal subdivision or plata, and wee accompanied by plat or tireetwe eutlinine the beurelaries of the territory petitioned be annexed; and the ' Lonnie.? Commiesian of the City of Renton having heretofore censidered and recam- • tretrie I tee <Lae of said property to the City' aril • e the 7,Ity Council of the City of Renton axed Tuesday, ;ctuher c, tq',9, Et WO p.o. at the City Council Chambers in the City eeil f the . City ,3f ,: •ntent, as the time one place for public hearlitg upon 0E11a petition, end eublic notice thereof Isaiine been given as required by Lew, including eeblication in the 'it ', leeel ,teraapaper, inviting all interested eersons to :erecter thereat and voice epprr-eti or iieeeeroval of or objections to the proposed onnexation, an1 e4 pubXic hearing 'ts./ifee t-een hell at the tine and place specified in afereenici notice, end tar Council e.i.eee hien advised to the premisee and having heard ell mutters and intcreete.1 • artt t tioectien therewith, end the granting of ti bid petition 'ecine leemiti proper atie in the public interest, ti:e: VIEREFeR.Z. .• t I ' fty T . eel) THE CUT .114•: elf? ar, • : • f. -erant to the proyieletui of Chapter 12:3 er the 1945 t.e.• •tece t washington, as aneonded, it id determined that tee :Agee. mentiooke petal o. ..:e'sriee..atien to the City of Renton of the eraperty a territory eareintielee • e.e.ecri`e . •Jet ishereby eppro.te.: and granted, an take CoItowti 0'0'1S er..yerty boitV o'vetleeee• to the cite limits of the City of Renton sttat.a Ii King Ceunty. •'tete • ••tt ',/: n I the sane fee hereby annexed to the f•Ity •tentun, eifective • • ,• • ,• , • • , . on gin: •rer t::.e �sse:: a, . ;.e;rol end pub1icotton of thin rr.:tn.inet.; `:n.; ..;et an; after t.1;:[ •:,.ta ,..:1 % er:rrit iry a%all .Ca4tttute a part of the Cie, or iox.tor'r ani shall be subjccr. t'.. ai; the 4nA ordinances then thnra.rter enf,:ree.l; ,,t': .,ro.}erey osinb .e,crtt:. .: • 1'tt ::rtiort of S..ction 5 Township 23 No. 451: .:.;l. lying .est oC the' :r.+r,t right .1f way line of l l2th Avenue S.C. and :•:.,st nf the ;:ast right-Of w..y lino of Primary State Highway No. 1. .tlso that portion •of "ection 32 Townshto 24 No. !t 5 E.W.M. lying west of the i' at right way line of 112t4 .:venue S.H. extended; South of the North right of v ; lino of S.E. 9E.th 'treat and said North right of way line extended F.ast; any east of the '6 et right of way line of rrtmcry ::fate ;;leeway No. 1; r:il situated in Una County, Washington. :Crum 1I. The above described annexed property contiguous to .'rocinct lo. l of the Cityof ,canton shall be and constitute a � __•, part of :'r®clnct No. of the City •)f i:enton. • 7ECT1'7M 111. This 'trdinanoe shall be In full force awl effect from and • after its ,anaeLe, approval and legal publication as provided by law. A certified cu;y yr title.. • rdtnanca shall be filed with the Board of King County Commissioners, King; County. -.tote of ;...ehington. i .27 CIIY C•;JNCIL this irte day of s.tabser-•1459. • /". • 1i1.N A. City Clerk BY TNI. MAY-hi thin it. Jay of ; rs►rrr' 4949; .lilt; :. ".'4T!'R, Mayor t;" • ty 'ttorne;y Pub1ir t ion March 17, 1960 l • • • • • • • 571 ` ), .. I I�1Ii --a .. , . ` - • , • - —� • �— — ORD. NO. l� 59 �,. • i1'' ••`' 5/26/6C j 9 1;1 I • - • 1 � i j KE ' DALE, '�Y �r' ,ST t -y — — " fIFM, Cp•e"" - Q �� / - ' +16 SCHOOI )`' ill .3 :a .5 1J 1 0 —_y.F— • 1^ `;Ar .... t59 d19 zee° _D��1 FEN' t �Y TS' �` - ;_�� .I. I .�. 'RO.NO229 - .. —__ ... _ 1 ,;titJ 1 a�._._ -: . .• : ::. . :.- .'NO !822•]4 ORD, NO-796 z S _�QRQ, 7/59 a. ' al ; g--1' .31; 31/60..'.. ___• ±;:_ 1. b.,,,I I I i j .� i ...�45 . I . . �� . _ -i.. . . . . -\ - 1 ,. , t. t . . . _ . . - • L.:A- 1 i13- .0 _ irti 'Si* • •• '. :. ,� .:•e art. _ _ —r'?�v • '- + 1 t�2 Lef Z. P. 2ti ,•• j • :,e • to * • .1of.) J ..T-" -.._._ •1, •'17�_ _- 'R••.-y�r- 4 'r•• �CZ • I j L•11 I tec. L•o t.i� {1'_ - :.± • 6 ,� _• _ '-, • r j�•'� I / "1/4)' — • RD. 111 , •, d tes 2ee j t.p_ 3ii• . tM :4' _ ;1.- 3:. r:;rlij - 1. -ti • i ..' �: • •., I,/ ._1L .. . . . - _ -A. ?'_Jor'� . -.1. . _I'`_ .�•�'•r - ,:G ., ‘' ._ A, `,.,9A . ORD.* NO. el-795 • • 4Of RA, • `., o THE CITY OF RENTON .V ., • W t V^ Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. ASH. 98055 z o o� '' .1. CHARLES J. DELAURENTI 0 MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 'O �Q- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 o4gtFD SEPj •0 August 1, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. PP-184-78, E-185-78; Wall & Redekop Corp. (Hi-Gate) ; Preliminary Plat Application. Dear Council Members: A request for reconsideration from Mr. Dave Biggar, President of the Kennydale Community Club, was received this date regarding the referenced application. Until this matter can be reviewed, we would request that you disregard the appeal expiration date denoted on the Examiner's Report and Recommendation, dated July 25, 1978, which was established for August 8, 1978. A new appeal period will be established upon publication of the Examiner's subsequent recommendation, and copies of the request for reconsideration and the resulting report will be forwarded for your review. Sincere,2y,''") L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk Parties of Record 0 THE CITY OF RENTON \! Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER O �Q- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 ,p4TE0 SEP�� August 1, 1978 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. PP-184-78, E-185-78; Wall & Redekop Corp. , (Hi-Gate) , Preliminary Plat Application. Dear Council Members: Attached is the Examiner's Report and Recommendation on the referenced preliminary plat request, dated July 25, 1978. The appeal period for the application expires on August 8, 1978, and the report is being forwarded to you for review by the Planning and Development Committee following the seven-day period from the date of publication. The complete file will be transmitted to the City Clerk on August 9, 1978, and will be placed on the Council agenda on August 21, 1978. If you require additional assistance or information regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincer ly, .) L. Rick Beeler Hearing Examiner Attachment cc: Planning Department City Clerk • AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 25th day of July , 1978 , of f iant deposited in the mails of •the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. ) !, n, )2/ Subscribed and sworn this X'11"day of j�ly 19 . Notary Public in an rot the 6ta.e of Washington, residing at Rentot Application , Petition or Case : 'PP-184-78, E-185-18; Wall & RPr3nknp Corp. (The. rn nuN.s cokitain a tLet v6 the pan.ti.e.ti o necokd) • my 25, 1978 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Wall & Redekop Corporation FILE NO. PP-284-78 .(Hi-Gate) E-185-78 LOCATION: Site is situated between what would be the northerly extensionE of Lincoln and Monterey Avenue N.E. and the streets of N.E. 16t and N.E. 20th. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant requests approval of a 30-lot preliminary plat and ar exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to permit a hammerhead rather than a cul-de-sac at the end of a 230 foot street off Monterey Avenue Northeast. SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department staff report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on July 7, 1978. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on July 11, 1978 at 9:40 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. Michael Smith, Planning Department, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibit into the. record: Exhibit #2: Preliminary Plat Map Mr. Smith corrected Section 0.10 of Exhibit #1, revising the words, "N.E. 10th Street" in line 3 to "N.E. 20th Street, " and also noted that the access roadway to N.E. 16th designated as Monterey Avenue N.E. denoted on Exhibit #2 should be shifted to provide an equal buffer area on both sides of the street. The Examiner called a recess at 10:00 a.m. in order to contact a representative of the Traffic Engineering Division to testify regarding certain aspects of the request. The meeting was reconvened at 10:20 a.m. Mr. Smith indicated that he had obtained clarification from the Traffic Engineering Division regarding departmental comments relating to preference of cul-de-sac bubble rather than, the proposed hammerhead configuration on N.E. 19th Place. He reported that representatives of the division had been unaware of the existence of open space proposed to the west of the hammerhead, and with this knowledge found the proposal acceptable to construct a hammerhead 200 feet in length to serve four residences on the back portion of the site. In addition, he noted that the hammerhead would be subject to improvements. Mr. Smith entered the following additional exhibit: Exhibit #3: Water and Sewer Plan The Examiner asked the representative for the applicant if he concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: John Norman Norman Associates, Inc. Evergreen Building, Suite 509 Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Norman indicated• his concurrence in the report. He clarified the intent of the hammerhead configuration on N.E. 19th Place due to existence of six-foot deep peat •materi, in the greenbelt area which tapers out to a level elevation with the end of the hammerheal PP-284-78 Page Two E-185-78 le noted that the existence of the peat was the reason the hammerhead configuration was letermined to prevent ecological disruption to the area as well as to lessen financial _impact to the development. He indicated that the plat would be a desirable addition to :he City of Renton in providing housing in an attractive manner. 'he Examiner requested further testimony in support of the request. There was no response. 'he Examiner then requested testimony in opposition to the request. Responding was: Stewart Dooly 2300 16th Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Ir. Dooly indicated concern regarding heavy traffic volumes on N.E. 16th Street. He •equested confirmation that access would be provided to N.E. 20th Street, inquired about :ompletion dates for street construction in relationship to residential construction, and .equested additional traffic control devices at the entrance of the plat. Mr. Dooly thjected to lack of sufficient sidewalks for children in the proposed development. The :xaminer explained requirements resulting from preliminary plat approval including nstallation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and paving which must be accomplished prior to .inal plat approval. Mr. Smith noted that the requirements of the ordinance encompass mprovement of all existing frontage on streets along the subject plat, but would not •equire improvement of the entire street. Mr. Dooly reiterated previous comments regarding eavy volumes of traffic exiting onto N.E. 30th Street from the freeway and utilizing I.E. 16th and N.E. 20th Streets for access, and emphasized that traffic control devices 'ere necessary. .esponding was: David C. Hamilton 1733 N.E. 20th Street Renton, WA 98055 Ir. Hamilton reported being the owner of a blueberry farm located adjacent to the proposed plat and suggested that during clearing of the site, existing alder trees be thinned at he perimeter of the site to allow a better view and provide better growing conditions for Blueberry bushes. :esponding was: Edgar T. Anderson 1524 Monterey Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Ir. Anderson made the following inquiries: location of proposed sewer lines; if preliminary plat contained specific development plans for construction of residences; if lots could .emain undeveloped for an indefinite period of time; if final approval of the plat was •equired prior to sale of lots; and period of time allowed prior to application for final dat approval. The Examiner indicated that sewer lines will be installed from the plat o N.E. 20th Street and connected to Jones Avenue N.E. ; that specific residential levelopment plans were not required by the city for preliminary plat review; that time of levelopment of the lots was the prerogative of the developer; that installation of off- dte improvements was required prior to final plat approval but an option existed to post bond in the amount of 150% of the proposed cost of improvements to enable procedure with final plat application for which approval is required prior to sale of lots; and that 'inal plat application must be made within one year following approval of the preliminary dat application. tesponding was: Richard Ford 2009 N.E. 16th Street Renton, WA 98055 Ir. Ford requested strict traffic control at the proposed intersection of Monterey Avenue I.E. and N.E. 16th Street such as a four-way stop sign to prevent speeding violations and )rotect pedestrian safety. tespondin g was: Bob Corwin 1717 Monterey Court N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Ir. Corwin reported existence of an easement located adjacent to the west boundary of all Lots on the west side of Monterey Court N.E. which had been discussed by residents as a potential location for sewers should they be determined desirable in the future. He questioned inclusion of the easement in the lot configurations denoted on Exhibit #2. PP-284-7u Page Three E-185-78 Responding was: Gordon McConville 1901 Aberdeen Avenue Renton, WA 98055 Mr. McConville was affirmed by the Examiner. He clarified Mr. Corwin's inquiry regarding the easement and stated that although a power line easement owned by the City of Seattle had existed in said location, three years after Mr. McConville acquired his property the line had been removed and he had purchased the easement which runs from N.E. 16th Street to N.E. 20th Street. Responding was: Lola Johnson P.O. Box 201 Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Johnson was affirmed by the Examiner. She inquired if the applicant was a Canadian developer. Mr. Norman indicated that the address of the firm of Wall & Redekop Corporatic was located in Bellevue. She noted certain discrepancies in Exhibit#1 regarding elevatic of the land; existence of surface water; distances from water and sewer lines, bus lines, schools and parks. She noted citizen concern regarding heavy traffic volumes on N.E. 20tk and N.E. 16th Streets, and inquired if storm water from the site would be channeled to a spring-fed creek. The Examiner stated that the inquiry would be referred to the applicant during his subsequent testimony. Mrs. Johnson objected to installation of the sewer line: on N.E. 20th Street where lines do not currently exist instead of installation on N.E. 16t Street, noting that residents opposed connection to sewers, and objected to requirement of adjacent residents to connect to sewers and pay a latecomers charge. Mr. Smith advised that although a latecomers fee is required for connection, it is not mandatory for residents unless a health hazard exists with septic tanks. The Examiner advised that the matter would be referred to the Public Works Department for clarification and response during the public hearing. Mrs. Johnson concluded her testimony by indicating approval of retention of open space in the development which is currently habitated by wildlife and birds. Mr. Anderson stated his concern, for the record, regarding traffic control at the intersection of N.E. 16th and,Monterey Avenue N.E. The Examiner referred inquiries made in previous testimony to the representative for the applicant, and requested clarification regarding connection of the sewer line to N.E. 20th Street rather than N.E. 16th. Mr. Norman designated on Exhibit #2 the location of the lin extending from the north end of Monterey Avenue N.E. with installation of a pumping statio in the intersection of Jones Avenue N.E. and N.E. 20th Street, and that the proposed exten. comprised a portion of the proposed Metro plan. Mrs. Johnson reported that residents in t subject area had previously vetoed an LID which had been included in the proposed plan. M Smith explained that although the LID had been defeated, a comprehensive plan for sewers must exist to coordinate future development with that plan. Regarding previous inquiries pertaining to storm drainage, Mr. Norman stated that storm water would be detained at the north end of the open space area (1.5 acres) and controlled runoff would be discharged into the stream along the west property line. The Examiner requested a representative from the Utilities Division to respond to previous inquiries. Responding was: Dave Tibbot • Utilities Division Public Works Department The Examiner affirmed Mr. Tibbot and requested explanation of the Metro sewer plan for the subject area. Mr. Tibbot advised that the Metro plan for the area was included in the Kennydale portions of the May Creek - Honey Creek Interceptor plans, and designates the major trunk sewers for the area. He noted that the proposed installation comprises an individual distributor serving on an interim basis until the Kennydale pump station is installed and the line would subsequently be integrated into the sewer system. The Examir requested clarification regarding requirements for latecomers fees. Mr. Tibbot indicated that the city's Utility Ordinance technically requires connection to the sewer within 90 days if the property lies within 100 feet of an operable sewer following installation Of the lines. He noted that Metro billing for the service begins immediately although the ordinance does not provide for enforcement for connection until such time as determined necessary by the King County Health Department for health reasons. He advised that it is the normal policy of the city to assess a latecomers fee upon connection to the existing sewer system. Mr. Tibbot stated that the subject area will eventually be served by sewers upon construction of the May Creek Interceptor dependent upon the availability of funding. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding designation of streets which would contain proposed sewers, Mr. Tibbot indicated that the main trunks are located only on streets running north and south and the individual laterals of smaller sewers serving individual properties are not shown in the Kennydale Interceptor plans. • PP-284-78 Page Four E-185-78 vIr. Hamilton inquired regarding the location of the proposed pump station. Mr. Norman iesignated on Exhibit #2 the location of the station in the low point of the road which would pump up the hill to Jones Avenue N.E. He advised that the installation would be underground and would be visible only as a manhole cover in the street. Phe Examiner requested further comments. Responding was: Michael Bucove 1835 N.E. 20th Renton, WA 98055 Ir. Bucove reported that neighborhood opinion which occurred in the defeat of a previous AID in the area had remained unchanged and residents were opposed to installation of ;ewers in the area. tesponding was: William D. Johnson P.O. Box 201 Renton, WA 98055 Ir. Johnson inquired if a new LID would be formed to provide residents with an opportunity :o express an opinion regarding the proposal. The Examiner indicated that the proposal of :he developer will be approved without necessity for formation of an LID. Mr. Johnson )bjected to mandatory requirements for adjacent residents within 100 feet of the development :o connect to the sewer without allowance for objection. The Examiner referred the matter :o Mr. Tibbot who noted that the problem had previously not been addressed in similar levelopment projects, but that Section 8-702.D of the Utility Ordinance addressed the -equirement. He read the section of the ordinance into the record. Mr. Tibbot indicated :hat he was not aware of provisions in the ordinance which address the specific problems -eported by residents regarding the subject development. He reiterated the city's policy :o notify all property owners involved in an LID upon completion of the sewer line regarding :he 90 day requirement for connection and that utility billing is initiated immediately. le indicated that the ordinance does not define separate policy for mains installed by a leveloper or by the city and felt that a policy decision may be required from the Public Jorks Director or the City Council regarding the question. 'he Examiner requested clarification on assessment of latecomer fees.. Mr. Tibbott reported :hat following submittal by the developer of costs for installation of the sewer, those :osts are divided between all benefitting properties on a pro rata basis computed by front footage of property. He noted that the difference between rates computed for an LID compared :o a developer extension is the latter would not include bonding costs, utility bonds and administrative costs. Ir. Smith reported that an appeal or exception process is contained in most ordinances of :he city to allow expression of opposition. Mr. Hamilton reported his concern that an assessment would encompass his 3-1/3 acre site which contains only one residence and would iot benefit his property in accordance with the amount of the fee. Mr. Norman explained tunicipal appeal processes and adjustments for assessments in circumstances such as Mr. lamilton had reported. 'he Examiner requested clarification of the appeal process from Mr. Tibbot, who noted that :he process was not designated in Chapter 7 of the city code but would be researched further. ie also explained the process for assessment for large parcels of property which are :omputed on the basis of the number of benefitting residences, although he felt that a )olicy statement should be acquired from the Public Works Director or the City Council on :he matter. Lhe Examiner reported that clarification of the requirements for sewer connection and assessment would be obtained from the City Attorney and the Public Works Director. He .ndicated that all correspondence relating to the matter would be reviewed in making a final recommendation on the matter and would be attached to the Examiner's report. He advised all parties of record regarding avenues of appeal or request for reconsideration zithin 14 days from the date of publication of the report and inquired if parties would )bject to this procedure. Mr. Anderson objected on the basis that the matter had been )reviously determined upon denial of the LID in the past, and the matter was being reconsidered without a vote of the residents. Mrs. Johnson expressed concern that the 4etro plan was being initiated although it had also been rejected by residents in the trea. Responding to Mr. Norman's inquiry regarding information to be researched, the Examiner advised that clarification of the legal question to determine appeal processes, whether requirement for connection to proposed sewer system exists, and whether latecomers fees would be imposed were necessary prior to issuing a recommendation on the application. Kr. Norman reported that the applicant's concern related to expediting development and not 'collecting latecomers fees. He suggested that the preliminary plat approval be expedited and the legal inquiries related to sewer charges be resolved at a later date. PP-284-78 Page Five E-185-78 The Examiner asked Mr. Smith for his opinion regarding continuance of the hearing or closure with the option of receipt and review of additional correspondence relating to policies for sewer connection. Mr. Smith felt that citizen concerns could be discussed during City Council review of city policies related to the preliminary plat application, and sufficient testimony had been received during the public hearing to recommend closure. Mr. Anderson reported that attendance at the hearing would have been substantially greater if citizens residing on N.E. 20th Street had been aware of the financial impact of the requirement related to connection to sewer system installed in the plat, and suggested that to eliminate the necessity for appeal or policy decision, the developer waive latecomer fees and bear the entire cost of the sewer installation. Mr. Norman briefly conferred with the applicant and subsequently advised that he would be willing to waive the latecomers fees. The Examiner inquired if the waiver was acceptable to the Utilities Division. Mr. Tibbot indicated that the matter would be reviewed with the Public Works Director. The Examiner indicated that clarification would be requested from the Public Works Director and that his written response would be attached to the Examiner's report. The Examiner requested further comments from Mr. Smith. Mr. Smith noted that the preliminary Planning Department report should reflect that the applicant had waived the latecomer fees as part of the extension of sewers. He also indicated an additional request that the Utilities Division review the potential for provision of sewer service to the adjacent properties to the east to be developed in the future. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. PP-284-78 and E-185-78 was closed at 11:50 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The request is for approval of a 30-lot single family preliminary plat and an exception to allow a hammerhead instead of the typical cul-de-sac. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official under specified conditions of: • a. Provision of proper development standards of the Subdivision Ordinance. b. Retention of significant existing trees on the site subject to approval of the Planning Department. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity except that sewer connection is required from Jones Avenue N.E. 6. The proposal is compatible with the lot area, coverage and dimension requirements of Section 4-706 (R-1) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances, except that Section 9-1108.23 .F. (3) . (c) . requires that Lot 10 be widened to 60 feet and Section 9-1108.23.F. (4) requires that corner lots ". . .be platted wider than interior lots. . . ". 7. Two pipestem lots are proposed (Lots 6 and 16) . An exception for the pipestem configuration has not been requested as required per Section 9-1108.23.F. (3) . (d) . 8. The proposed hammerhead at the end of the proposed N.E. 19th Place abuts the 1.5 acre open space area which contains up to approximately 6 feet of soft peat soil. The design requirements of Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) have been met. An exception per Section 9-1109 for this construction has been requested (E-185-78) : PP-284-78 Page Six E-185-78 . One parcel at the northwest corner of the site was not included in the proposal. This parcel has not been divided from the subject site and is not a separate parcel. A legal subdivision has not occurred. . A storm water drainage plan has not been submitted for review by the Public Works Department. The applicant indicated that a retention pond and controlled run-off will be included in this plan. . Off-site improvements on N.E. 16th and N.E. 20th Streets are required in the public right-of-way directly abutting the subject property. On-site improvements meet the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. . Restrictive Covenants were not submitted. The staff recommended that covenants be prepared to provide maintenance of the two open space areas in the proposal via a homeowners' association. . The applicant stated that latecomers charges would be waived for those property owners (whose property lies within 100 feet) required in the future to connect to the proposed sewer extension along N.E. 20th Street to Jones Avenue N.E. For confirmation, the attached letter from Wall and Redekop Corporation of July 14, 1978, was provided by the applicant. In the attached memorandum of July 17, 1978 from the Public Works Director it was stated that this connection would be required after: 1. Evidence of septic tank malfunction or failure; and 2. 90 days after notice by the City of Renton. Also stated was that while the latecomers charges would not be assessed due to the aforementioned waiver, some connection charges would be assessed by the city on properties required to connect to the sewer line. (See attached memo, July 24, 1978) . Some significant vegetation exists on the site. Several trees exist in the 1..5 acre open space area which contains soft peat soil. The open space area at the southeast corner of the proposal does not contain fragile soil but is used for access to and through the proposal. . Traffic problems on N.E. 16th Street were reported by residents of the area. It was requested that traffic control devices be installed at the intersection of the plat access. (Monterey Avenue N.E.) and N.E. 16th Street. ONCLUSIONS: . The proposal conforms to the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map. . The proposal appears to serve the public interest, health, safety and welfare (Section 9-1106.2.E. (2) ) . . The Planning Department should review the proposed lots for conformance to the criteria of Section 9-1108.23.F. Lot 10 should be widened as recommended by staff. But all of the corner lots should be reviewed again. While staff questioned Lots 7 and 14, it appears that Lots 1 and 19 are more questionable. . In order for the Examiner to act upon the pipestem configuration of Lots 6 and 16, the applicant must request an exception (Section 9-1108.23.F. (3) . (d) . . The hammerhead at the end of N.E. 19th Place appears appropriate. Soil conditions prevent construction of a typical cul-de-sac (Section 9-1109.1.A) . This will allow the applicant to construct a dead-end street that meets all other applicable design requirements (Section 9-1109.1.B) . The public welfare or other properties will not be injured (Section 9-1109.1.C.) . . Storm water drainage plans can be reviewed by the Public Works Department and the restrictive covenants can be reviewed by the Planning Department prior to or at submittal of the final plat. The attached memorandum, July 17, 1978, from the Public Works Department, indicates that the applicant may waive collection of latecomers charges. However, those properties eventually required to connect to the sewer in N.E. 20th Street will be assessed the connection charges already established by the city. Septic tank problems were not indicated in the hearing which leads to the conclusion that the affected PP-284-78 Page Seven E-185-78 properties may not have to connect or pay charges until sometime in the future, and only then after 90 days from official notice. 8. It seems clear that only residents directly affected would be eligible for the applicant's waiver of the latecomers charges for connection to the proposed sewer line in N.E. 20th Street. These residents would, according to the testimony, be those whose property lies within 100 feet of the sewer line. Only these residents expressed concern about the requirement of making future connection to this sewer line. 9. The Public Works Department should review the traffic problems raised by citizens relative to access to the proposal. Appropriate traffic control devices, if needed, could be installed after and if the final plat is approved. 10. The staff recommended that the alignment of the proposed Monterey Avenue N.E. be centered on the property abutting N.E. 16th Street. This should be reviewed by the Public Works Department for establishment of the optimum alignment with existing streets and traffic safety. 11. Normally during development of a subdivision as many as possible of the existing trees, are retained by the developer and builders. Because of the unstable soil conditions in the 1..5 acre open space area along the western portion of the property, it seems appropriate to require that trees be retained in that area. But in other parts of the property, unstable soils or sensitive topography was not shown to exist or be of concern that other environmental factors exist to warrant staff review of removal of vegetation. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the record, testimony, findings and conclusions, it is the Examiner's recommendation that the City Council approve the preliminary plat of Hi-Gate subject to: 1. Review of the corner lots by the Planning Department for conformance to Section 9-1108.23.F. 2. Widening of Lot 10 to the requirements of the Planning Department per Section 9-1108.23.F. (4) . 3. Removal of the pipestem configuration of Lots 6 and 16 or submittal of an exception application. 4. Storm water drainage plans to be submitted to the Public Works Department for review prior to or with submittal of the final plat application. 5. Review by and approval of the Public Works Department of the alignment of the proposed Monterey Avenue N.E. with surrounding streets abutting N.E. 16th Street. 6. Waiver of latecomers charges for connection of those properties within 100 feet of N.E. 20th Street to the proposed sewer line in that street. 7. Retention of existing trees in the 1.5 acre open space area on the westerly portion of the property. 8. Revision of the plat to include the parcel at the northwest corner of the property. 9. Submittal of restrictive covenants and/or restrictions to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to or with the final plat application. 10. Public' Works Department review of the need for traffic control devices at the intersection of the proposed Monterey Avenue N.E. and N.E. 16th Street. Furthermore, it is the decision of the Examiner to approve the exception for hammerhead configuration of N.E. 19th Street due to compliance with Section 9-1109. ORDERED THIS o�.� day of July, 1978. . Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner PP-281,-,d Page Eight E-185-78 TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of July, 1978 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Jim Isler, 1912 N.E. 20th, Renton, WA 98055 John Norman, Norman Associates Inc. , Evergreen Bldg. , Suite 509, Renton, WA 98055 Wall & Redekop or . , 400-108th Avenue, Bellevue, WA, Suite 412 • Stewart Dooly, '23041 16th Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 David C. Hamilton, 1733 N.E. 20th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Edgar T. Anderson, 1524 Monterey Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Richard Ford 2009 N.E. 16th Street, Renton, WA 98055 Bob Corwin, 1717 Monterey Court N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Gordon McConville, 1901 Aberdeen Avenue, Renton, WA 98055 Lola and William Johnson, P.O. Box 201, Renton, WA 98055 Dave Tibbot, Utilities Division, Public Works Department Michael Bucove, 1835 N.E. 20th, Renton, WA 98055 Dana Lee Baekiel, 1835 N.E. 20th, Renton, WA 98055 Douglas C. Core, 1828 N.E. 20th, Renton, WA 98055 Joan Walker, 1433 Monterey Avenue N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Keith Brownfield, 13512 S.E. 266th, Kent, WA 98031 TRANSMITTED THIS 25th day of July, 1978 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Councilwoman Patricia Seymour-Thorpe Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before August 8, 1978. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make _a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the City Clerk's office, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said office. I I I •� %.---.•�I • I id I 1 1 I :� I 11,1 I �ffl' "2r --i 11 .9iI I c -- r ---1 '`ICJ Ilt► �_— - - - -1- ---IP 1 t1 ! _J - ° ./I 1. 1 .11.-- t1 jj U 11it;( �!id a 1.1illii :, I D jID .1Ii N•E• _ 2oTH' ST • ftj 1t-r I II • . "ii.glem: 5,r. . , :i:i:i*-::?:.:i:i::,:.::i*:i::.:i:-:•:,..:.: Or -- --I- - -- - - Dt : : : . ... . cos.. : . .t L v - w t• _ ti _ ^ - 5� _ 0 F• go m . 1 b 1 - .I 1~ 1 — L immi.:xi::::.•::::.:•::::.:..r.,:.::::ii:.:.?:::.iiiii:.?.:.i:.?:,..:::am::.* *.:: ::::.:.:::.::.*:-:. :,::.:,.:::.;iii.,:•.:i.::•:' 0 . • :52] E' 1;- . U - OF O .(2'• 1" -7C:1. 9 00 . . C --- Z z ce aEl __ • • . 0 I 3 - [� W • D n Q I Q V . .:,:,:,:,,,,,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,,,,,:,:,:,.,:„:::::,:,:::.:;:;,;::::„::::,,,::::,::,::,:::..::::::.:::::::.,:,,,,, U I - - 3 tul �....1......3151'.. ..' ' � _ .. n f.----44cp-----, : 1 r-t 1 ,. .'I? [] I I 1DiJ$I ? � o1❑ —t• 180 ❑ I ILr_l W. 'rf-- I® 1 • • /6 iy S — a r-�2Oo Ci �go• ;p : 3 6011 I .1;14 . PI I] . -0 a' El El 0 0 r—--4 - 0 1 5 --- ----L—E] ' — —--n- , 1„ 1_,_ ..1.= 1%S a , n i c, _ _ _ ' l -4 _ Ct Cr] SGALE;1' �.200, SuPiTEGT S/7EE 1441717 ReDEKop cop. H14Are E-185-78 • +� • • .. V • I I n'•, v, J.h�, q r• • ,'v:q 11 f • • I i]' r .‘• / ' a•! loot to/ 1 • .., . • .• .. I 3 �// �_,.:s �';' Z N 4 • • / ' I 4 SJ.) 7s ' • / N PL w / J, I i • ' J .a ' r • i ! '1 ibti . 4 V+ J. { In ' 7a` % O' • , • > N I. 'I AIJ � \ In \ f los co • . - / 1. '' o •\ — v� 1 K.. s--" . .• . ��• .�.. P.) i.• rti *3 0 r ' P m ( • - . I rl "A ... A \ n a V / �I1' -pAi _ - --- ' • •' NE 17th Pl.:, o`I' ' , 0 o —� de L r I I) 2Y 1 r ;:•. w N 1 .. IV ` Jti1' • A�, L•._- ._..L� !f 'I:i �1 r.{t,,..T r�jrrY,w�w y' " J fi• • • • Q_ yJ:{f'in i/.ii Ott' s••�........s.••,•.wsww.*N+.++� , . '; 1{of� !fh �^:�4 �r 4',,•'4�tf� 1 l'i' ^ �: a3 7` i . . ; � •'..ti 1. r44.Yr .."4G,.tl t: r.1: i;t':'':1;3,''' "fit; _ ^11 .:t. : 1:. . .ice. 1 ,..,-,..,,,,,..../.,.;'-�., •r,, t:.. r • - .1• ,,IAA , '• 7.' • • f'"jyi'Ls r R *! • WALL Si REDEKOP CORPORATION 412 400 108th AVE:"N.E..• BELLEVUE, WA 98004 •453-8925 July 14 , 1978' L. Rick Beeler Land Use Hearing Examiner Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue, South Renton, Washington 98055 • • Reference: PP-184-78. • E-185-78 Wall & Redekop Corporation Hi-Gate Dear. Mr. . Beeler: • .As developer of Hi-Gate, the Wall & Redekop Corporation agrees to waive late comers fees for prop- erties within 100 . feet of the proposed sewer to be constructed by ourselves for this project. . This would not include any parties wishing to extend this sewer. This is my understanding of the commitment made at the July 11, 1978 public hearing. Yours uly, G y R. Strother Vice-President • Land Development GRS/sw l'Atttiv5b • • CITY OF RENTON' HEARING EXAMINER JUL 181978 AM PM 7,R,9eW,11A1 s213s4,5,f • • C) _ v THE CITY OF RENTON N • MUNIC;PAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 o Ed �i;• �' CHARLES J. DEL.AURENTI , MAYOR e LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER • . L. RICK BEELER • 235-2593 4it° SEP1 -�O July 11, 1978 • TO: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works' Director FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner • SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Hi-Gate, Wall & Redekop Corp. , File No. PP-284-,78, E-185-78 During today's public hearing on this application great concern was expressed by property owners abutting N.E. 20th Street regarding the implications of the recommended sewer extension from the development to Jones Avenue N.E. via N.E. 20th Street. The applicant will be installing the sewer at his cost but it appeared that these residents would be required to connect to the sewer and pay late-comers charges • per Section 8-702.D. Residents disapproved of this and referenced the last turndown of an L.I.D. for sewers in the area. In. view of this opposition the applicant expressed a willingness to waive late-comers charges for connection to the sewer line. Is this acceptable to your department? Is this allowable under city ordinances and regulations? All parties in attendance in the public hearing were agreeable to your , response being received by the Examiner after closure of the hearing. I will need your response by July 18, 1978 and will attach it to my recommendation to the City Council. 'hank L. 'ck Beeler Hearing Examiner cc: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney - CITtf OF p 'TON HEARING El NER 4 OF �� JUL 181978 Phi V w ; 191181111121l121ab4i5's PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E. • DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 206 235-2569 13 ®,Q�T fO SE Pt t48' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI July 17, 1 9 7 8 • MAYOR To : L . Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner From: Warren C . Gonnason , Public Works Director Subject: Preliminary Plat of ,Hi -Gate, Wall & Redecop Corp . , File No. PP-284-78, E- 185-78 You have requested additional information with regard to to the City ' s policy requiring connection to a sanitary sewer . As I understand the situation in this instance, the . developer will be providing sewer service for his development and in so doing , will install sanitary sewer facilities in front of already-developed prop- erties . The .City ordinance requires "to connect such facilities directly with the proper public sewer in accordance with provisions of this chapter, within ninety ( 90) days after official notice to do so pro- viding that said city sewer is 100 feet of the property line . " It has been the policy of the City administra- tion in the case of developer extensions or sewers con- structed outside of local improvement districts of a trunkage nature to not notify abutting property owners to connect to said sewer facilities providing there is no evidence of septic tank malfunction or failure . In short , the ordinance requires the connection after official notice to connect, however, in the absence of such official notice, the connection would not be required . The City ordinance also provides in connection with late-comer' s charges not previously assessed , would pay a connection charge including a front-footage charge, as well as the $ . 01 per square foot systems development charge . This would be true even if the developer did not seek reimbursement by means of a . latecomer ' s agreement with the City . The funds thus collected by the City would be deposited in the Utilities Fund and for the benefit of the Utilities Fund . Therefore , when and if a property owner is notified to connect, he would be required to connect L . Rick Beeler - 2 - July 17, 1978 within the specified ninety ( 90 ) days and to pay the fees in cash or over the specified payment period provided in the ordinance . " —17e W C G :,j t OV Ft c THE CITE' OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON. WASH. 98055 o gip CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 4s.Q- L. RICK BEELER . 235-2593 �4TFD SE Pit° July 19, 1978 TO: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director FROM: L. Rick Beeler, Hearing Examiner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat of Hi-Gate, File No. PP-284-78 • • During the public hearing on this application, residents were concerned about the sewer extension proposed for N.E. 20th Street. • They questioned if a process existed to appeal this sewer installation. Since.the applicant waived latecomers charges, their concern was • apparently lessened. However, in your memorandum of July 17, 1978, you stated that the city would assess some charges of its own. • Therefore, their concern may still be as great. • ' Is an appeal process available within the Utilities Ordinance for • these residents to protest the sewer extension? Or is the only avenue of appeal that of appealing to the City Council for review of the Examiner's recommendation on the preliminary plat? Per Section 4-3016 this appeal must be based on ". . .error in fact or law. . . ". Please respond on or before July 24, 1978 in order that your response may be included in my recommendation. Thank yo Beeler Hearing Examiner • cc: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney � oFR� e. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT z o WARREN C. GONNASON, P.E. • DIRECTOR o S MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 206 235-2569 O'P�TFD SEP'��0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR JuZy 24, 1978 TO: L. RICK BEELER, HEARING EXAMINER FROM: WARREN GONNASON, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HI-GATE, FILE NO. PP-284-78 Reference is made to your memo on this subject dated July 19, 1978 inquiring as to whether or not there is an appeal process available within the utilities ordi- nance for these residents to protest the sewer exten- sion. "Title 8, Section 719, Public Sewer Extension" provides for the extension to the public sewer system by developer extension agreements . There is no appeal. process in the ordinance for residents to protest such an installation. This is the first instance of this type that has come to my attention and to my knowledge there is no avenue for appeal and the developer has a right to the exten- sion subject to reasonable city regulations and require- ments. Therefore, it would appear there is no real avenue open for appeal. It would seem to me that a developer would be entitled to such an extension to provide the utilities service to an otherwise acceptable preliminary plat. i- WCG:j t cc: Mayor City Attorney RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER 401. 2 41978 NM 411!H .I2.l'UM i516 - ln t 8 wear lz ;:fit Nitiel®� NOR AN ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS• EVERGREEN BUILDING,SUITE 509• RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055• PHONE: (206) 235-1544 May 30, 1978 City of Renton Planning Department City Hall Renton, Wa 98055 Dear Sir: We are requesting an exception for the Higate preliminary plat. The exception is for a hammer head at the end of a 230 foot street off Monterey Avenue Northeast. A cul -de-sac is not feasible due to an extensive layer of peat in the proposed open space. ohn E. Norman ' I G77016 of RECENEDN JUN 6 1978 NG DE.? • COASTAL • HYDRAULIC • ENVIRONMENTAL • CIVIL • SURVEYING - !' -f' .3 NORMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. �- CONSULTING ENGINEERS• EVERGREEN BUILDING,SUITE 509• RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 a PHONE: (206) 235-1544 June 1 , 1978 City of Renton Planning Department City Hall Renton, Wa 98055 Dear Sir: We are requesting an exception for the Higate preliminary plat. The exception is for a hammer head at the end of a 230 foot street off Monterey Avenue Northeast. A cul -de-sac is not feasible due to an extensive layer of peat in the proposed open space. An exception is also requested for pipe- stem lots for lots 6 and 16. The physical constraints of the property which include the property shape, the layer of peat (in portion of the area designated open space) , and existing access preclude development of lots 6 and 16 without use of a pipe stem access . $100.00 is enclosed for the exception fee, and $45.00 is for the environmental check l i st fee. R �'N.k..... C • 'John E. Norman. 077016 4 REN -0 (2 \V''' ' + ,` 1N.g1 1- U �� ,emu tip-\\/), • E NNIN6 1 COASTAL • HYDRAULIC • ENVIRONMENTAL • CIVIL • SURVEYING . ; • , (. CITY OF RENTO.N V. • SHORT PLAT • PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. TP / c ' 7d --..X.- MAJOR PLAT V DATE REC' D. 7- 77 TENTATIVE 4(PECEIVEb OrIt?4APPLICATION FEE $3 0.00 +100.0(XPRELIMINARY o ENVIRONMENTAL 5.00 FINAL Z REVIEW FEE $ � JUG 7 1978 • RECEIPT NO. spz ^ --y -0 �f. SM NO - • � .../N R� � PUD NO . 6 DEPP APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : . • 1 . Plat Name & Location Hi-Gate ' Between NE 20th andNE 16th and between northward extension of Lincoln and Monterey Avenue NE . 2 . No. Lots 30 Total Acreage . • 9. 8 Zoning G7200 3 .. Owner Wall & Redekop Corporation . Phone 453 8926 • Address 400 108th Ave. N.E. Suite 412 ___ 5 . Underground Utilities : . Yes No Not Installed • Telephone • ( X ) ( ) ( X ) . Electric ( X ) ( ) ( X ) Street Lights . ( X ) ( ) . ( X ) Natural Gas ( n ) . ( ). ( X ) . . TV Cable . • ( ) ( ) ( X ) 6 . Sanitation & Water: ( x ) City Water ( X ) Sanitary Sewers ( ) Water District No . n ( ) Dry Sewers . • ( ) ' Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE • COUNTY PLANNING r� BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION: • TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED • APPEALED EXPIRED 10 . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER ' S ACTION : SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED • FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: • PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12 . DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : • . • DATE DATE • BOND NO. AND • TYPE • GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT J . 1 • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON . rt , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM. OF- RFjV A CFIVE!) � RE ® FOR OFFICE USE ONLY JUN 7 1918 . Application No. PP-/f=7LE_L 5-76' Environmental Checklist No. .4-C.,P.356�7 ' c= PROPOSED, date: FLI4AL�' :DE+� R�� EiDeclaration of Significance O Declaration of Significance aDeclaration of Non-Significance 0 Declaration of Non-Significance - COMMENTS: T . Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter•43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be . prepared for all major.actions 'significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is' to help the agencies involved determine •whether or not a' proposal issuch a major action. • . Please answer the following .questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your ' explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You -should • • include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide . Complete answers to these questions now will help all ' agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- ,out unnecessary delay. • • The following. questions 'apply to your total proposal', not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, . even though completion may not occur until sometime in the' future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating •paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the • • ' next question. • • EN£RONMENTA� CHECKLIST I ST FORM BACKGROUND- . . ' • 1. Name of Proponent __._Wall.'& Redekop_Corporation_ . Addr ess ress and phone number of Proponent: • • 400 108th Avenue .' • Suite 412 • • Bellevue, Wa. • 3. Date Checklist submitted 0b/01/78"` _ 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton 5. Name of proposal , if applicable : . Hi-Gate 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but. not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate ' - understanding of its scope and nature) : . 3n lot subdivision with 7200 square foot minimum lot size. . Total property size is . , acres.Adjacent land use is •housinq with . 7200• square foot lots except some undeveloped land and a blue berry • farm to the west. - S . • • • 1 . ' . " . • . . . _ . .. . .. . . . • . - .... , • • . . • . . - • -2- . - •. . ! . . . . i• . .. . . .. , , . . • • '. ,. . ,. . . . ; . 7. . Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well , as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including ' •-'1 •any other information needed to iive-an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proOpsall: , :. --. •• • •• . . -between NE 20thand NEJ6ih' andbetWeen northward extension . • . • . _ .. • ; . . . • of Lincoln and Monterey-Avenue NE . • • , • .., . , . .. , • . , -.....- - -- - ... • , . • . • . . 8. Estimated date for completorilof:thi proposal : • . - • .• - July 1978 . • . .. _ . .. . . . . . . 9. List of all permits, licenses or. government approvals required for the proposal : - . • • (federal , state and local --including rezones) : - - - :. ' . . 1 • _ • City of Renton tentative, preliminary and final plat. .• . - . , . ._ . • Approval of water and sewer from City of Renton , - . •:. .- .. . . . . . . . .. . . . • . • • • . . .• 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity • • ... .- related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain:, '..: ., . . . • - . -- • • - • ..- . . .- : • . None . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . , • • •. .• . . • . • . . • . ' . . . _- . . . _ . • . ' . . . ' • . 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by. .„.... ' • . ' your proposal? If yes, explain: .. .•. , •.• . _ . , .. . _ . . . • . _ . . • . No • • ' • . . _ . . ' . . . . . . , . . . • . . • . . 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- . .- . • • posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be •filed at some future -. • ..., date, describe the nature of such application form:. _ . • „ • •. . • . • . . ,. . • . . . . • • • . . . . • . . . • . - •: . .. . : . • . _ _ . . . . • . .. .. _ . . • . . _ . . . . • . _ . . ... ... . . _ . . . . . . . ... ... -, - .. . • . . - . . . ,... . .. . _ .,. . . .. • . • II. . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS . . . .• '. - _ _ . . . . - - . . , (Explanations of. all "ye's" And "maybe" answers- are required) ' .:. . • . . . • . . . . . .-, .• . - • , • - •.•.• .. • • . . . , . .••.•.• (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: . . . • , . . 2 • '. - ..... , . -•-• . ; • (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic '_. '. f Y , .-- -.. ' : - :-. . . . .. • substructures? • : • • . '_IL • • ' . MAYBE NO - - . ... .:. • . - . • , . (b) • Disruptions, displacements. compaction or over- ,. : , ' • - • • -- • covAring ,cf the soil? • . , _ . - - X ' ' • - , YES . MAYBE NO . . . . . • .. , . • . (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief . , • . . . . features? • - . • - . . • . YTS— MAYBE WU-- -. • . . • .. . - . . • (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any . . unique geologic cir physical features? . . • X • • -• • ' YES . RTYVE i• . - • - • . . .. (e) Any increase in *wind or water erosion of soils , . • either on%or off the site? • . '. :. . • . . - • YES MAYBE NO - • . . , . • • • , . • . • •(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach .sands , or - - . . . : -- - .-• changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which . , . . ' . . . may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?. YES AMAYBE NO. . • Explanation: , , . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . • • . , • . . . . - • • . .. . . . . , - • , . . _ . _ . • . . . . , . .• ' . . . _ • • . . - • . . . • . . . . . . . . .• .. .• - . , . • . • • . •,- -.:- - . .... ,-. ..: - • . . • . . .. . : ' '• ' : ...... ,. • . „ . ....- :.. -. . - -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? MAYBE NO (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or X regionally? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: From increased traffic due to Spa additional housing units (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents , or the course of direction of _ water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X - YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood.waters? X . YES MAYBE NO. " (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water. body? .. . YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X • . YES MAYBE • NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? V X YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X . YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through - direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? . .. X - YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? X Y MAYBE KU— • Explanation: " • (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any . species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass , crops , . microflora and aquatic plants)? X YES MA BE NO • (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? . X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or • in a barrier to the normal replenishment"of existing species? X YES MAYBE .. NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X YES AYBE NO Explanation: Existing alder and black berry bushes will be removed for buildings and roads. -4- . ;. (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of • any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles , fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area , or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna?. . X YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? X YES • MAYBE NO Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? - X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: From increased traffic due tom additional 30 • housing units (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or 5 glare? - YES MAYBE NO Explanation: ------ ---- ------- — --_ _ (8) Land Use. Will ,the proposal result in the alteration of the . . - present or planned land use of an area? X . YES MAYBE Nt0 Explanation: ___•_ __ — (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? • X YES. MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural: resource? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: -- - (10) Risk of Upset.. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, . . but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) - in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: - ( 11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population X of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: _30 'Housing -units will probably increase the population ~ . ` �6- ' ` ` » (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X � ' YES— MAYBE N7T— (e) Storm water drainage? ' ` ' X ' YES— MAYBE' N7T— ' ^ (f) Solid waste d disposal? u e an spnua . YES- MAYBE 90— Explanation: ` _ (17) Human Health, Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? . ` � X ��' MAYBE NT- Explanation: . ' ' (%D) 8esthedns' Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or vie* open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthet|ca}ly offensive ' . site open to public view? X YES_ MAYBE �O-- Explanation: � . ' . �-- _-- ' (19) Recraation' Will the proposal result iri an impact upon the ' quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? �X _ ` T��_ MAYBE� ` F0_ * Explanation: _ ' (20) Archeological/,Historical . Will the proposal result in a'n . � alteration of a significant archeological or historical ' site, structure, object or building? . �'' ' 'X � ` YE?S— MAYBE NO ' ' Explanation. SIGNATURE 1 , the undersigned, state that t� the best of my kvowledge 'the' above- information is true and complete. It is understood that, the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might iss�e in reli ` checklist should =� ^ os there be any willful misrepresentation or willful . ure on my part' - ` ` Proponent: si g - - ' ' . ' Gary Strother ' ' n.7me printe^ ` ` ' ' City of Renton ' ` Planning Department" � 5-76 � -5- • f • ( 12) Housing. Will tne° proposal affect existing housing ,. Vr X create a demand for additional housing? _ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: It results in increasing existing housing b +f lots • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: - (a) Generation of additional .vehicular movement? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X. . _- - .. _-- .- - - . •-- -.._ .. - ._ . YES MAYBE . NO. - (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? • - X YES MAYBE NO . . :i•. . (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or • . movement of people and/or goods? X - YES MAYBE NO . • • . (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X YES MAYBE NO - (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, '. • - . bicyclists or pedestrians?• X • . , YES MAYBE NO . Explanation: . ( 14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon; or , • . result in a need for new or altered governmental services • . in any of the following areas : (a). Fire protection? X . . . YES - MAYBE NO ' (b) ' Police protection? X • YES MAYBE NO . . • (c) Schools? . . . YES MAYBE NO (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X . YES . MAYBE - NO • (e) Maintenance of•public facilities, :indluding roads? • - • ,X YES MAYBE NO • . (f) Other governmental services? • X . - . .. YES . MAYBE NO Explanation: • • (15) . Energy. Will the proposal result in: • - • • '(a) Use •of substantial .amounts of fuel or energy? • X . . - YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy; or require the development of new sources of energy? X • YES PIP-EDT-NU- • ' • Explanation: • (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new . . • systems, or alterations • to the following utilities: • (a) Power or natural gas? . • X • • ' • YES MAYBE NO. . X (b) Communications systems?_ . • • •YES MAYBE NO . • (c) Water? • • . X • • , • . . • YES MAYBE NO . • • AFFIDAVIT • e I irz,,/ „.'e'• a.1,., ,.� ,c-!fir, ,. being duly sworn, declare that I am the owner of the propel:4 (/involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and a1iswers herein contained and the information • - herewith submitted are- in all respects true and correct to the- best of , my knowledge and belief. , Subscribed and sworn before- me• • �� this �� day of .�u4.1e 197`- , Notary Public in and for the State of • Washington, residing at ZI �.,,ky) rj /Z -1(/\--;:e://7(----j • , /1" ../. . . , , Z--er,,,,,T,L.: _,,,,-- . ne 'of Notary P.,.... .":,,...,__A.7-zblic) Signature of j9iwner, • .-7" . . • ?re--1 le, .- ,,_'-‘....e---7--.-.(--,.--4-0 . Vo ci M s-r- A-,)0_._ 1\) _ 4,-41,Y.,.. .,-,g , Kjo, , ./. z-/(2-q, 67, /0 .A-,_:, `Address) (Address) . . .ti, . . , , )4 . . . . Ca.t (State) • 3 " 4YD"/ . (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that .the . foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: . . Renton Planning Dept . . 2-73 • ' AFFIDAVIT • • I, Gordon J. McConville and• Eileen A. McConville am the owner of the property involved in being duly sworn, declare that i , foregoing statements an�3 answers herein contained land the iand rrmat the ati herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the beston of my knowledge and belief® Subscrid and sworn before me this -7 day of ' 1: 7- , 19 d , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at LL -\,_. a --i- � � , `tl s / /'-J- 6 ! � L / / em ,/; 4a/,7.'{ . -, ^` \i / tv I , � (, -,4ter/ ('(, ' G7� ��1(Nafne of Notary Public) ((Signature of Owner) r . (Address) 6 .e--,---e- -ice- o� /3 ,,t//4 Ji �i (Address) v/ / - ,_-( (City) (State) (Telephone) • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) • CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in. every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application , Date Received 19 By : • �4 ` ° THE CITY OF RENTON • �� ! 8MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 b° . CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT O 235-2550 fD SErit June 28 , 1978 Wall and Redekop Corporation 400 108th Ave. N. E. Suite 412 Bellevue, Washington 98004 RE : NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR Preliminary Plat Approval of 30-Lot Single Family Residence Subdivision and Exception to the Subdivision Ordinance Regarding Street Configuration; Files No. PP-184-78 and E-185-78 , property located between N. E. 20th Street and N. E. 16th Street between the northward extension of Lincoln Ave. N. E. and Dear Monterey Ave. N. E. The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 7, 1978 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for July 11, 1978 at 9 :00 A.M.. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing : If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours , <° j , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning Director By : Mi ael L. Smith, Associate Planner cc: Mr. and Mrs. W. L. Saunders • Mr. and Mrs. G. A. McConnville Norman Associates Inc. MLS:lr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, • WASHINGTON, ON JULY 11 19 8 , AT 9:00 A.M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS: 1. ROBERT AND FRANK EDWARDS, File No. SP-183-78, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT FOR FILLING AND GRADING IN G ZONE; property located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 23rd Street, northerly of 1. 1 the Olympic Pipeline Company. —2. WALL AND REDEKOP CORPORALION (HI-GATE) , Files No. PP-184-78 an�E-185-78, APPLICATIONS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVALT 30-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SUBDIVISION AND EXCEPTION TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING STREET CONFIGURATION; property located between N.E. 20th Street and N.E. 16th Street between the northward extension of Lincoln Ave. N.E. and j; .2 Monterey Ave. N.E. Is; 3. GLOBE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Files 188-78 and W-189-78, APPLICATION FOR 4-LOT SHORT PLAT APPROVAL AND APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS; properly located at N.E. 9th St. and Harrington Ave. :JLE.., westerly and southerly of the Safeway facility. Legal descriptions of all applications noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department. • ALL I , I `s 'lJ si TED THE PUBLICS HEARING ON TO SAIJULL TII1, 19/ E INVITED TO AT 9.00 A.M.BE PRESENT AT TO ICI: EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. June 30, 1978 ' GORDON Y. ERICKSEN PUBLISHED RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR - CERTIFICATION STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn • to befo e, a NotaryPublic, on the �tnday of ine \ 19 78 _ SIGNED ve(ek..-a41..„4.,, REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : �-F/2 ry/seer /4-117 Comments": & L/11 / I" c -Fut r 1r©( d ar k_ {) u e (I 144 14 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : UT< <..t. n.e 5 Ar ov T- Commen s : 24-- 66- 78-7,y- Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Commentqui- s : A O Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : O Finance Department Fire Department Library' Department OPark Department • O Police Department Public Works Department & Building Div . gEngineering Div . 8 . Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) 4•I c -i Ir i 4- DATE : ,L iff91?/ PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT OI - 4-il PERMIT OR EXEMPTION fi l-C C-/(1'S-'b' E X4 rT1 o ri.) AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE ej./0 7 A2 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 40Z-✓j� (.,— Anent . -, e-,e-7 ------ /--.CW-if-2._ 1-79 -7," Signature of Direct of Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : De artment :F /( A \ie Q PI>Afrizov 1 . ommen ./ ., .„. Signature of Director or Authoriz R'e-presentative Date Engineering 1 . Storm drainage plan including retention/detention plan with calculations will be required. 2. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, strom drainage and paving required on NE 16th St. and NE 20th St. 5)--;;0116‹:773 Utilities 1 . Separate detailed plan' s to City specification required for Water and Sewer. 2. Main on 17th Pl . Must be looped. 3. Butterfly valves approved for 16" and larger only. 4. Plans of gravity line to pump station and plans of pumps and force main required. 5. Standard fees lasq. ft. Water and Sewer. 4 CITY OFRENTON LAND )USE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JULY 11, 1978 AGENDA COMMENCING AT 9: 00 A.M. : COUNCIL CHAMBERS, SECOND FLOOR, RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING SP-183-78 ROBERT AND FRANK EDWARDS Application for special permit for filling and grading in G zone ; property located on the northwest • corner of the intersection of Lind Avenue S .W. and S .W. 23rd Street , northerly of the Olympic Pipe Line Company . PP-184-78 WALL AND REDEKOP CORPORATION E-185-78 HI-GATE Applications for preliminary plat approval of 30-lot single family residence subdivision and exception to the Subdivision Ordinance regard- ing street configuration; property located between N . E . 20th Street and N . E . 16th Street between the northward extension of Lincoln Ave . N . E . and Monterey Ave . N . E . Short Plat 188-78 GLOBE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY W-189-78 Application for 4-lot short plat approval and application for waiver of off-site improvements ; property located at N . E . 9th St . and Harring- ton Ave . N . E . , westerly and southerly of the Safeway facility . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JULY 11 , 1978 • APPLICANT : WALL and REDEKOP CORPORATION (HI-GATE ) FILE NO : PP-284-78 , PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL , E- 185-78 , EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE A. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant requests the approval of a 30-lot preliminary plat and an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to permit a hammerhead rather than a cul-de-sac at the end of a 230 foot street off Monterey Avenue Northeast. B. GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owner 'of Record : Wall and Redekop Corporation 2 . Applicant : Wall and Redekop Corporation 3 . Location : The site is situated between what would be the northerly extensions of Lincoln and Monterey Avenue N . E . and the streets 'of N . E. 16th and N . E . 20th . 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department 5 . Size of Property : ± 9 . 8 acres . 6 . Access : Via N . E . 16th Street and N . E . 20th Street 7 . Existing Zoning : G-7200 8 . Existing Zoning In Area G-7200 , Single Family Residence District . 9 . ' Comprehensive Land Use Plan Single Family Residential • 10 . Notification : The Applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance . C. PURPOSE OF REQUEST : To permit subdivision of the subject site into 30 single family residence lots for future development of single family residences . In order to permit such subdivision , the applicant is also requesting ' an exception to the subdivision ordinance . D. HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance No . 1818 dated March 17 , 1968. E. PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : ' 1 . Topography : The site slopes slightly downhill toward the north approximately three-quarters the length 'of the parcel and . then levels off toward N . E . 20th Street . 2 . - Soils : Indianola loam fine sand ( InC) ., Runoff is slow to' medium, and the erosion hazard is slight, to moderate . ,This soil is used for timber and urban development. Capability ' unit IVs-2 ; woodland group 4s3 . ' 1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : WALL & REDEKOP CORPORATION , File No . PP-284-78 , E-185-78 PAGE TWO E . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : ( Continued ) 3 . Vegetation : The subject site is densely covered by native northwest shrubs and numerous alders . 4 . Wildlife : The existing vegetation of the site provides suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5 . Water : There is no surface water present on the site. 6 . Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped. However , single family residential land uses generally surround the subject . site . F . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The area is primarily single family residential in nature . G. PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : A six inch water main runs east and west along N . E . 20th and north and south on Lincoln Avenue N . E . Another six inch main extends north from N . E . 16th into the subject property approximately 300 feet west of Lincoln . An eight inch main runs east and west along N . E . 16th at the southern boundary of the site , and a four inch main extends north and south on Monterey terminating a.t N . E . 16th . An eight inch sanitary sewer main runs east and west on N . E . 16th , and a similar main extends north and south approximately 300 feet west along Jones Avenue N . E . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department as per Ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit route #142 operates along Edmonds Ave . N . E . approximately 800 feet east of the subject site . 4 . Schools : Hillcrest Elementary School is located approximately one-half (1) mile east of the subject site and McKnight Junior High is approximately one-quarter (4) mile to the southeast and Hazen Senior High School is situated approximately one and one-half ( 11/2) miles to the east . 5 . Parks : North Highlands Park is located approximately one -quarter . (4) mile east of the subject site with Kennydale Lions Park situated approximately one-quarter (4) mile to the north and Lake Washington Beach Park one-half (2) mile to the west . H. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-706 R- 1 Residence Single Family. I . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENTS: 1 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9- 1106 . 2 , Preliminary Plats . 2 . Subdivision Ordinance , Section 9- 1109 , Exceptions . 3 . Comprehensive Plan , 1965 , Land Use Report , Pbjective 6 , P . 18. J . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL SYSTEMS : Development of the subject site will disturb soil and vegetation , increase storm water runoff, and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . However through proper design and provi - sion of suitable storm water retention facilities , these impacts can be minimized and the natural wooded character of the site preserved PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: WALL & REDEKOP CORP . ( HI-GATE ) PAGE THREE K. SOCIAL IMPACTS : The subject request will have minimal social impact except for that caused by minor population increase and the new relationships that will be a result of such an increase . L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C, a negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued for the subject proposal . M. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION : A vicinity map and a site map are attached. N. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3 . City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4 . City of Renton Utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department See attached comments . O. PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ANLAYSIS : 1 . The subject single family residential plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations for single family residential use of the site and surrounding area . 2 . The proposed subdivision is consistent with adjacent single family residence land uses and subdivisions . 3 . The proposed lots ranging in size from 7200 square feet to approximately 11 ,000 square feet are consistent with the mini - mum lot size ( 7200 square feet) of the G-7200 zoning in which the site is located . These lot sizes are also compatible with the adjacent Cresent View and View Terrace Subdivisions . 4 . Lot 10 is approximately 58 feet in width and will need to be enlarged to meet the minimum 60 f.00t lot width requirement . This will require adjustments to other lots adjacent to lot 10 or the deletion of lot 10 from the plat. • 5 . Lots 7 through 14 are particularly narrow in certain areas which will reduce flexibility of building size and location . Particularly the two corner lots number 7 and number 14 should be platted larger both in area and dimensions . (Sec. 9- 1108 . 23 . F. (4 ) . ) It may be necessary to delete a lot between lots 7 and 14 to provide wider, more flexible , building sites . 6 . The tract of land at the northwest corner of the site has not been previously subdivided from the subject site . This lot must be included in the subject plat. 7. The proposed hammerhead street (N. E. 19th Place ) with pipe- stem lot arrangement is an acceptable alternative to the cul - de-sac arrangement given the existing topography and soil and drainage conditions of the open space area . The proposed . hammerhead street meets the minimum ordinance dimensions of Section 9- 1108. 23 . A. ( 7 ) . 8. The proposed pipestem lots ( lots 6 and 16 ) are necessary given the shape of the existing parcel and the location of the pro- posed open space , a 1 . 5 acre parcel of low poorly drained PLANNING DEPARTMENT • PRELIMINARY REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: WALL & REDEKOP CORP . ( HI -GATE ) • PAGE FOUR ground . Extension of the streets into these areas would not be beneficial to the overall plat design , and both lots exceed minimum size requirements and dimension requirements of the • pipestem. A minimum 10 foot wide paved driveway improvement is required the length of the pipestem as per Section 9- 1108. 23. F . (3) . ( d ) and Fire Department requirements . 9 . Suitable utilities are available in the vicinity of the subject site . The developer will be required to extend sewer to Jones Avenue N . E . and install a pump station . Additional Utilities Division comments are attached. Detailed plans shall be sub- ject to Public Works Department approval . 10 . Curb , gutter, sidewalk , and street paving are required along those portions of the site adjacent to N . E. 16th Street and N . E . 10th Street. ( See comments from Engineering Division . ) 11 . Certain significant trees exist on the subject site. These should be retained as much as possible and incorporated into plat design and development. 12 . Suitable means of maintaining the proposed open space should be provided in the form of a homeowners ' association . All open space areas should be designated on the plat map together with any necessary written restrictions . The proposed walk- way areas should be so dedicated on the plat map . P. STAFF RECOMMENDATION : Recommend approval of the proposed plat subject to the following conditions : 1 . Provision of additional lot width to lots 9 , 10 , 7 , and 14. 2 . Including the property at the northwest corner of the property as a lot or tract within the subdivision . 3 . Provision- of utilities and street improvements per Public Works Department and ordinance requirements . 4 . Suitable designation of open spaces and walkways on the plat map with provisions for maintenance through a standard home- owners ' association , subject to approval of the Planning Department . 5 . " Retention of as many of the significant trees on the site as possible . All 'clearing shall be subject to Planning Depart- ment approval . 6. Provision of suitable on-site storm water retention and oil / water separation facilities per approval of the Public Works Department . Staff further recommends approval of the exception for the pipestem lots subject to provision of neces' nary paved driveway per ordinance requirements as part of plat improvements . 1_ 1 ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR\APPLICATION TO: ® Finance Department 4 Fire Department IP Library Department 0 Park Department • ® Police Department 0 Public Works Department 0 Building Div . 0 Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee ) / MkC-4A.CL S�Sirl-# DATE : 6,�1S7P PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: r� REZONE � 7 MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT / WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE /.LOS7P REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : FS A-rOfiz N De SAFFIZoVE? Comments : Signature of • ector or Author zed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ►:� pp \t 1715 Comments : SignatUre®f `rector or Authorized Repre entative Date ,1 ,,„ r, REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : ,' Department : %�a/''�'i . E„yJk-) ce7-'i�J A, Pt �1c �`� SAf�rz c>vu Comments : 5 Ai°Iro v /H f;.79QY Svc G \ / ► ,uln -Re� Lr ‘.z -. ;o� s 9 - /1D6 SeCC04 Z To h DeVeu1 of k1i5�o + pdj aS / _�e Z 3L 5 c�i-��l , — _�I"�,. s / /7Yri DJ C� • U`1 d 6-1-7 i c.Le,-, d U/,'/,-14 y /cvy O�� 7E5 ---- P--a�PC a29l Ba,S vf I OCb r1. 3hS 1 Te/c�pk )7Vc8k J .®l e eCIrie At -- 7-ecQu.e5 s, Apt' r piGal Cron 5 C*F6aar5, Hoe derail Plahc,o kl=, Ili c!uie Si'veef L.114,' —Deck , , C- 2, zi 7154. 1/45 Y �-�1 .2 _C ' . Signature of Director r Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Cam' ri,. , r iir. .1 / ts i z t)v M Pi 5/s-c p rac�!L-F' Commen / .y,.( rrs�tr'�-I Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : ommen s : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : .; Department : Comments : 55• , ' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date y'` . • • •7;, ;.fit i ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : (:) Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department' ® Park Department • Police Department Public Works Department 11 Building Div. 1 Engineering Div . 0 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) . k,1uAA:l_ SM I DATE : 4 /9/71 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: REZONE MAJOR PLAT SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT 1�1 47/1- PERMIT OR EXEMPTION f' t* C-45-7 ' ExciErnoi, AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT Oiff-/P WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : ,3L—lJ �-'" y �cr e t>isAPr, 'jc om ent : �Signature of Direct * o/ f : A �uthorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Dep artment :tt � C : �I� en D PI Aff71z-,civer: a ,.._ 4 ,,, . --/r- ir\----_ + ' ../,..?,/ :7 Signature of Director or Authoriz ' Kepresentative" .' Date /f A REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: ter /2.. n R0N ( �ti , v Comments":: flea/0( /71'1 Q.V i d c, a V-01.t-,,d a ti (L„L.t i d -, f 6 b ; Lu a-.-kc-obr 1 c Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : u—/ 73- 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments. 01� �� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date is ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO: Finance Department Fire Department Library Department Park Department Police Department 0 Public Works Department 0 Building Div. !i Engineering Div. Q Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department, ( signed by responsible official or his : designee) SUBJECT: Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Jy_J f -7,�? Action Name : Ill — 4Tr. L L) L — Please review the attached . Review requested by (date) : 4/2.41 73 Note : Responses to be written in ink. REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : %va/7 e IN(-C7 /1�.� Comments : emu, 's � /��`J /1.7L%<..,5 b0 �4�U a_be C I 1 Pi 71-u E.:4, Ye) Y 9 /9-iii7e Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Comments . - , 636, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Engineering 1 . Storm drainage plan including retention/detention plan with calculations., will be required. 2. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, Strom drainage and paving required on NE 16th St. and NE 20th St. Utilities 1 . Separate detailed plan' s to City specification required for Water and Sewer. 2. Main on 17th P1 . Must be looped. 3. Butterfly valves approved for 16" and larger only. 4. Plans of gravity line to pump station and plans of pumps and force main required. 5. Standard fees 1 /sq. ft. Water and Sewer. .2ta . • . ' .r, • . . . I;...: 1 I. 1 •' ! 11 T .. . \I • T : 7-•-••••••71".."( 7""'"7."7.' ! ! 0, 2 EN1 TCPKY' (-II Cr 4 L. NM-112, 1 1,..I _',, \,...;_zest,, , 20.., 259._t 2139 , 2 36 Z2.1 LIZO 203 1 L ' 11 ',_____I i_ ' '-'-----z--_. - ' •• ; , !---'---1-----t Priss i I ! .1.'• 11' i• .; • ' .. , 1 E A"---- L--Zir,,----J- 1 ..,..4' II 1 _i_ I 4> -' •'1 . I I—4 ---) Z7 8 t _,_ _ ___.i -----1--,-,_.__..2_4_L,. _r_ , Glaje •'0 frA: . j....,,i 21!"!. \ii 0 ------. ' • Z Ti . 7.- ---r-- 257 ' -: ' ,--77-; I ,-----1--.,,„_____L„--- ,,,, 1 .0 . e . i , - z.i,; --` . 1:j ,_. -__71 240 1 2 5"• 2!2 2 tiLl.911.'._: ?LC,1 I I.\70 7 '- (..-------TN 4,:<.;...,.4....,-.. _ . ,.... ,. . ___r_ ____,.___,....,...z.,L,_- z.7, . __,- Ha,, : 1 . i__ _________-... ..1-! i ----i.c".?:- \\ lb,s---------- ,,,' , .u. dl, ,1, . 1--- -T-- 7-• ' ' '''— 1 ' .'• • ! •-•-•-•! 1,1i.-_ ',..\\ °!;••••, ,9 . .1111,M11 ,4 ! ;, 1;12-4 ' '.'—' --i - . . --- --t '...'- !. I '--ri 's i - LI • _ .\\ \ •.' . • \ 1\ .,\ r u 0,3' 1,, , • .\, .. 1.. 1 1 0 •1 _ .. ,i-, _, ',, .•, I' 1- ,,. • -- 3- !!! 35' --4 11\1 1 ":4iii 295 1 e.2. 2 4 Lt. 254 ! . 24: Z3, 2 23 4 ,izi_..• zn,r,, I 1 n it , • it,. ' I'1 II L'', 'I r I. L i 1 --r----4 ,di- -...1--, -------.,--N____4-_--,-.• ic.47t-,__i__' .1_1_1 Lr.--s-T--1--- -_, -- [-, 'itIl1 ,:,. ,I - --, ' , - --. I 3" , IV i ' 1-- --, ab.. . ,'/3 '' 53 ' 24? 235 224. . ,_2_, ,. .,......J . ,_ .. ..., ', - ' --1.-:1,111:,::,-111`,51-17,4stto. ,1,,,,.ii,11.-!.417:l 1 Ts.;`,,,,‘,..,,,.•„.:' • i- i-•,--t,--• •• ,,i1,• \ r • r- -.7. ') .. . -, 1:••:ig_±11__.: ---,,, a .f.draR--1-- --'1 t I 4 \ \,0\ , , 1 •,.329 .5i is,r‘r- i,,‘ . . . ••• ••i \\ \, >2-..4 .7-1;'[::••21:-:-IT-*/- 7-'-7-7- .;• ;!- II Z93 284 212 _, 2G3 , I_'_ a., 143 2,_ .- 2 a 5 •:,_. , .3,...1..4_1 , , . , , „_,. ,,, ,n. , i . 340 _/_ - ° --.3. --, ,_ .).F... ._ 11 ' • -•74--:---„ ,.f..4 . ' • I ''' -- ' _ .. ' . .. I Ir 0 I\' Pen I ' :,1 ' -- .--' __i. -,--,-' — `--1---i—i-- ------li- i'l \ se:‘-‘r,3.;-'---- : 1 .',''.- ----L-7.---'-" : :; '' 'T. " 1 -t-3T'T-'4. ' 1E11 I ' tt IIA., t •23• ,. : :3s .3 , .,,, ,:: ." • ---] r- --_, '..,,,-.• lit -1Ti .• ,,r,t, .. !,, - . / ) 1 •••• . i ,„ , Ii';!,4.. 7, _.:, , ,, , , !, \ Ni .:!.... ti,.1!:!!!'!,!_:ii.:i.p.s 51,iii.'''''i 't• ..4,1,11.:(t‘ci i..:!ri,,r.i, \. -,' .\ , . / \ ' ' 3.511 / , l'i I ,,,n ! 'a, ' '1! z.51 u.,i z44 !...,,,,, 4 •• ZI15 ' 208 , 1.1, t.; t.. \\ - . 545 •' -- :.--1 - - .-1 ' , ---' -' ' I ill..--1-----1,-- ..A 't .t!!'g i 23 • ; ' I EEI f '! `9,/e'', !..!:A:!:•\:1_, o2..a:!;::.1: '; • * •'.,''-1. I . \\ 356 34. ' t ' t' Ma 20 ro w ' ' ,.. ..-. ,:WhindiNk' • i 0 • 1 . • V • 1,k'\ , ' ' I 11-(3 cli'l 'ri 're' 4 !!••'ZO --•• -,.!'. •• '• .1. ',/ - 1.12.4 1 '1 .5 . E.:•!;•i. 24 , 7-5.1 1 28 to k - . . • t 2 -:,.-z--,,_,jiii ZI 7---•----"i I:4. . '. . . C,./..,,a...''... ‘, , '' 1 1 • .1k ,1 : —..J.' ! • ) ! \\,1111s •1„ • L__t_, L... .i..._ . i - k— - , . . \ I ' '', . '.. I i . 'r;It* , •,'4,1f,•*•,•:1 '="54/6zrec T l. \'{' ... 1 [ ' 1 ''' s .•'i- I:"1 > • .1W.,.. s . . • / rt t• .I'„ .S''' , i"rE ' \ \....-• '-'. • '' ';' -r: 0 ',IP,I., _,;_, i.4,3 ;e1 24,r. 231 I 228 Iti , 2IC, '. ,____ _ _i i r 1' ' . : •'ffiA ' •.,ilt-:-• it.',... ' • , \35 \ . \. s/I ,A •--., ''7 g,_eat.-- ,31 ' , /-' Ft."3 ...-- .----- ... Lts.KGSNATH.- \if - •' ) . sob Q11, 01111101". ' • • z.; 1.3. •.• i,.....I' ,. !l i•k,.- --5-,•-4.:.. .,,\,\ .\,• 2i 138 -....\ 147- 1 1-1 3.0 2..,-,'-,..l•l,''b-,-',.4, ..„ . . -, 1 IlG700 .,c4 \/ q .- . •a,7ifx-L•, .,, / / / / 4 _ 4 • - ..,..., ,.4, 0 . . i\ 7 / / t."/ . . , . . __ f — a - ' . „... ' \ d d• .1 . t''. [''' ' '' T.: . . li, ..)\:., N.. •P".. ' ,, "-''' s'7.7.!"-1 r • r r ". • - 2''''' ' 1 -r's .!, A .A . - •':71'.'hilf;- , • • -i: *'. \Pf. 55 6 I A ,/ • • WALL AND REDEKOP CORP. (HI-GATE) - Files PP-284-78 and E-185-78 • . . _ . . .. - ' • - ..- - . • •• - - - - -•- - - - - , - - - _ - • -- ' • ' APPLICANT Wall & Redekop Corp. (Hi-qate) TOTAL AREA ±9 , 8 acres . . PRINCIPAL ACCESS N.E. 20th Street and N.E. 16th Streej .. EXISTING ZONING G-7200 . . . . EXISTING USE Undeveloped . , PROPOSED USE R-1 Single Family Residence . . .. . . . . COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN R-1 . . . . . , . .. COMMENTS • •. . . , .. . . . • . . . . .. • . , . ,•., , . . . • . .. . . • ' • .. • . . . .. . . , . . , . . . . , . • . .• . . ,. .. ,.... ... „ . .,.., . . . . „.., . , , ' • . . , . . . .. ;'. . .-- • • . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . • ,.. , . • • . • , . , •-iio ..':'.i .,' ',•- .1 - . . ' „ . . . • . J-•'-' • ' , ' ' • • . ' . .. . ' • ,. • . • . • , • . , . 1 • • , ;',,,i',.• ',':- • . '•— • ••,'.. . •."'...if,siIII''''',IViVe.• !.. ' • . „. • '.•,'•••••• •: •.•.'-..4'xiit-,„ii,,-'0•'•,g . • . --- . . . • • ' 2 o t Is . •. - • .. ';•,;I:',"....L.:-'.......:','.I,IiI,:•.':f.lIsIJI.‘2,-gi,1:-II:•,", . • . '. . . ,;,,r, •,',...'...I...-).'::'''•. ','',','..•,:g.I.,(fi.,P. - — —T-4 , —.------ , . •.. ,.1 . ., . , .,..e.,,,,,,,:. ..:•. . ." • ,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,,,;•,.:,,,,,,,,..,„.,: , 1/ 1 , ,.., .0. . . . . „ . • .•.....„.„...," ,: . . .. _. , . • .. it A . , .2... ..,, : „...„..„.:::,,,,..,.." • .., .,.,... , . • . , • , . . . „. . . , • p . ...• . , . .... ' , . I 0 u,' , • I • . ...._, ,. ., - - • . • vi i • ....,... • 1 , .3a 6 i ea 5 ••••........ . .r i 10f, • . .. . . ' , I • • PI, ,\ • A . • ' • ' .,.,, ,. • . • , ,1. Z 1 ; , • / •//,. ',3, I ,..4. ., • ! 0D, • ,...c -4 • , ,. ..-..„• - / i ia 8, ' 4?1.1 J ..,,_ " ' .: • . • I, I • • . f ...Qi!... / / i j--- , , . _.1., 4) • NE019th PL . . . . , • /// ,-" / • I . • . ' • / / / .'/' 1-//' . it .. . 98 I - we.* •-i‘ ! —. i------76.-c-7-- , „ i . 1...., < Li "• V c, •• • / tl • I ni P A • : --,-,-, ,?...,c A .,,,, • w .• I •'' / ,, • ' , ; • '•' H-------I;T--- ..0 -• /"` , i . l' /' V ... ,, !. I. . . a 2 . ., . - . • ' , . • • • we , i i--1 Iv o . / X ,,•'.\. I: ,' us. '..".! rre ,,A, ;,•., . f •• ,-, I o• I. ._____T6 5 ;/ / •Ars // NI. / . • . -.' • 1.3 ' I.- ".° //' p..) sl ,/ X0/ / / , / , .'.> i • ... S il .1 b. N • • Y ft '-/, • . • , / ir / / '' „X , / . - • • / 4c / ' ) i 0 5 ' ••• . . . , • I / • . (' /••r; / / ,\./1 •• • " -. ' . t 1','/ '' • „. ,, ,. / 6) •'1%.) • ••1 ., i / ..'>./ // A\ . '•!_••";• ., • •.,/ . . • / / . . • . . /, • ,1... 0 // /..--- • ,;,•' / N 10$ . _ . , . , , • \ '/ / / / • - /4 9 '-'' \. . . . \ / t, ' . \ ' '• . ,,3 . . V: • ,'• - ,t:' m ,.....• AS , , .,.., , • , - •1 - . . / • . ,. • b O• l'' . , I • . 1 1 ,,1 ._._..):_. • --',.. ., . . . .• -6----_____ I i( . • . - , m ' • .. • •-•-- •- --- L913 '• . (56— s, ts) \ _ „V Co . .0 ' ‘ • . . . \ fi',:\ \\ •4 ii _. • til \?.../.- •.- \ ---- -- . ....--- ... . • . ',.!, ',;. , • ' k, •.,... . ... .. t. ;.; • \., . ‘•1 o . . . . r *, ,. 0 . , s. ...., • • \ S4 '• . 0 . , . .•. • , ';;T:;'"'''''.::'. ,-- — „ .. . • ':\• NE 17th IP 1.r, • . . ..,,• ; .. / /i \c,., ......:. ,,..),,....._...... , 4 • , • " :''.''' - ;'', '-',:'';'..I.,,,,:.!',"',:,.' • / • , " :1'' .' ••,.1,-!,..,•i,,:;4,,',•1''.f.'',, '• • . 01 • . • • • 1.';/.1:::,.„•,•,','..,,•••;: ; • ,, •. •• . . • . „ . , co • ;......',..'.',,,,'',!;,?/,',.,?'•',';'',Y„ .1 . , .. . • . ,.b • • ,•• c.) , ...i • ' ,...., ...-,,.. iri,•, ,'..:•;',.;,i,-i:,:i,,,';•,ty,•,i,,,. / .• - .• , , „,.•• -, ... ,),•,-;.1-,p•,..,,t,:ti-,.•,',, ( , -- . , s. ;„.,i..s.,,,,ii4,,,'1'1,,,l'• . • , • . • . , ,'," :',',,;.',• :,•-:.,:•,-,..,-„'•-•417v..,0•J•/ . /. , c.,/), I ' . ,• ' •,,,'n• '-''-',•;-:•:-,....•,,,W:,„.14,,,-P . . . _ALL_ ,,4,,,,i, • • • . . .• ; ,, ,,,-T';,::.-•••.•,;•,,•,,,•,:kokil.1, . • • . 1 • • ,. ' . , ,. .. ,Ii.,....,......,,,.,.,..,,...,-,....,,,,,/•,,,l, 1 - -- -,.,-••,- ---• - .. . ::.'..:,....:...,.:: :',...:'''..'-'..,''f.:;Ir''Ll''''•1:-;''':;!•1;1-r1;.'ts4.$•Ih..::.''', . A 1 . • . . • . i . , . . • , ••‘•i.1, •-,,•,-,/_..,,,4,40,4,?1°•,.s.•.• , . . 1, . . 7• .,...„,.....,•-,,,,,•,,,,-...cft ;•.4,4`?,'•-ft " ii' . I ,. --So- - . . .. ' ' • ''': • ...: •''''''',';.:•:;,'•';':(:.:1,VN'.•-k,'ii.,,ti,.,Viltlit• ii.,., . , s , . . .. . •, •• ,-••;•.' -.../s•s,,,,,,,,41;•,,,amy•iii,2 ...,_,,„F,„) ,,„ „ „. , . . . ,,, . ,.. ".:'......'•••,.':,4',6,k;.,.,3,;.„,... ,•',, . ''',.'.','`..,.,`,,,!;'...,,,q•,!,),,„-;,'(.t'..F. ;II* .,r, t„,,.„. . ,,... . • •„••••,„•,,,,,,..„...,.,,,,„ . .., ,, •,„ •.• • •.., .• ,...,,, ;:;5 . 7 • . '':;44:,'!,,,,;sr-s,,,,..',,',,,4 . ., , : ::'..',',',,,t;.‘.!'•if,'-''.!•.Prf.i.,,i- 4 ':', . , -'11 I'i•-1, ;,,s1,. .e.,' •,:!. 1, • .•,,e,.,'',.1.,‘"V-,..'- .,-,. ,1 I ii '...;.'•.•'••• '---•. •• • n••• : . 1 .,.7`1'.1r.T . . • . - ...;1:, , • '• '. • • •• .:.•:-.(1,4'-'•;.•".!•:'•'•':.12. ...'• • ••••••'4;?..!`'f:- 4%1,Y Afffql'; ',;.1;,%," ' ' ,,..;' ,• . q:',' .' ••••';'),'`.."i It'•i• i"-i4 ' •:' ; '" ki, C';;"1;';-;"•.:':.','•• ::'. ' ••1;:,f'-i'i;:.0.-.^",;;•,,'4.',i'C',1•;1.ifiY:iM, • '';''''.,;':'''..''•., 1.'ji';/•„.'',...:4X.:•..i.P.:':,....,,,..-.3 ,,.•...4 . . •••. ,.•;,.2.-. .'''•;, :. ..',''' '!..'2• 1',••',';.'.:1`•';Iii),•.ii•'.. itA:'4..i;1's ''; •,) ••;!'.';•-;„' •.', ;• • • I . I . ''•• '.".`A.,,'•,-?'•' '44...' , ' '• ' 4),,.-1.F.It'e.I'S*94- 'I . . • I • . • , .••••,s,s..../..,',•!,•-•or,' , , • • ,,.;!::.7-',I•,,:q.:I.Y N'' i,'.;,NIII6,1e..‘ : - ‘ ,,7 • • •, ‘..,-...•.,:", -.!-. • ,,,,:',, ,..,,,,,,L,),1,%1'3.1•,V.,,,,,,..„',am, t` *4-, . '. :. . ''',,'... .• .. . ' ''',.*:':..,..",,:',..;'it'e:lil.'''';':P,,,;I'''Piti.i j.,',''l'i'. . ,;','•],4:,';..A.,0;4,,:";'',''Ai'V4,0 WI . - 1 , 4,-1?,gi'itc,ii.i:lif'., , - N ' , ._I.,',4..',,''•......',. ,'',:•.• .' ' .;!.''.'i,.'. 4;',..'f:', .:.,',4',440''' • '''ti4.''i '''':•;',''''''‘-..:'':'-',' ' •.- --,--1,---;- ''''•- --......-.... ----,. :-...,...'tt'%..74, .--.:-.......'---!!!“----•..-...-...1 4 .,. ;,.., ,••••.:•;;: .. . •• , ,-•'••.'. -:•i'')';',. ";,'S'''.•'•••,• ii';','....?dr., i'1111 ' ';' .:''•;...,;••• . • .. ,. • . .,, ','••.•' . ' . • • • :.'•••.';'. ••....;:`,;'!; ':CT,,4,';.!'..4 4441)411 -•...'r,.•.. .• . , , ,' ,',., , ',.,::' ',1',,-'","::,;?",,I,-.r.,VAV':.:4;, NE oh. . . ' 'l ' . . • ' . ,. ., . . . .,„, ,,-.,..,i...;,,,,-.',:,,,,i,),,,,•:!,,11, ti 0 .,h • ,•-, • • .•i.. .:, • . • ,..•.'••••.'•,1 i',: :•-•.•,,..-„;,,,,'„•!!!!'••••.sso',,,,,.1-, 1, . . , • „ . ., ,... • . ,-,,?,,,f;•,,.,.,,',..s,•„•;" . , •i,••••• • • • s • ;• •,•"';;;;,'',,;!.•.',I's''.',1:',;.;',;,t.4,-.ge '4;,',0 ...1...,•• •'•"•••' . - •• . • ',-:,-,,,.1-',',,s'.`••••, ',•,,, , • • ,... .. , •,••_•;,nst,,,,, ,s;-,-•-•••,,,,,,•••-7...,‘,---.,-7-"0,"--.-,•- '1'-117'`-7'''''''' •••--,'',,i- si,.'••.: !.=,-,•.,,•,„.„,:•-.,'• •• ••. .•.• . '• . -,T:.•••.•I._y,'A,:',,,4„,.4, t kii.: • . . . • • . •... : ..,'' .:..'„,,1,,;;;;LIY,,,t,,4. 1 , . . . • .r, ,, ,. , , r . .r,,rr.,rr,.:... „ . .,., . ..,, ::"::•,r: i i'.-',,,',., .,,:.1,,'',,,:;,'IdrFre tliv . • ,i.X,,,f,1:':="'','' „ . • - • . . , , . , . . . . . . ,' ', ,-:',..";,' ' --: .' '''.';'',',:f'...."' '.•',..'t,'::"::''.::'''.:'..-,:..'.1 't • '''''..:,..`, ,- ".- :'' .,', •',' it:',::' '•'',:'1-.F1.11' „j'+'••'',J , ., • .F.. '' '..',.. ''' :.,. ;...t"..',''C'4..'''‘..'' 'I': ..' ''. ' . . •'..:1.,', ','''1'',.::'.i..4:'?14:''',1.A. i . • . $. .,.,,,p,r'A- ' 1.. . • , . . ' . . '4',4.'..4'.!`.,.. ,;••' '•• ''' '•• . • . , ',...•::::,:::i'::.:.". ''',' • •„ . • . . . . . . . , . .• . • . • . . : PROPOSED/FINAL L_.__ARAT I ON OF SIGNIFICANCE/ __.d:-S IIGN I F I.CAN'CE`:'' ` ''�`r:�°`�;:' PP-284-78 .;.. . Application No . E-185-78. ® PROPOSED Declaratio:n ,� ?',;v,r2{`t. ECF-356-78 .:', Environmental Checklist No : � ® FINAL Declaration I .' .,,,:,-,',. Description of proposal . Preliminary Plat approval for 30-lot "i,• single family residence subdivision Proponent. Wall and Redekop Corp. (Hi-gate) Between N.E. 20th Street 'and N.E. '16th Street Location of Proposal just west of Monterey Avenue N.E. Lead Agency City of Renton Planning Department This proposal has been determined to , 0 have ®' not hay a ', ' significant' adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS L is (x is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was ma a after review by the lead agency of a 'complete.d environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . . . Reasons for declaration . of environmentalna gnifican'ce : This declaration is based on the provision of proper. cdevelopment standards of the subdivision ordinance,, and the reter ipn of ' significant existing trees On the site subiect to approval of .the Planning Department. . Measures ,' if any, that could be taken to prevent or mi.ttgate the - environmental impacts .to such an extent that the lead', agency would withdraw its declaration of significance' and issue-..a (proposed/final ) declaration of non-significance : Responsible Official • Michael L. Smith ' Title. Senior .Pla ne Date Jul^�r:. •f' 1'g•78' - Signature C `:t o.:f;,. Renton' :', :: y: {' 7 . P:lan'ni`ng 'Depar;tment ``;' 5.-'7,6: .: i " '' Va ,'ji.l,,',''��,•' 1 y 1 .,: 4i.r}J.� 0..a { • • 1 P! t ,et era. ., • Pi :'11 i','•`' - '.,:1' 7r,d,.,.i r. .:,s ' ` ,,;e n',!ui 1°'';•• '+eJ?;` it^ira' 1,f.,i r' 7„.?tr".. .t r1<s<tr 4ee .F' _ :{ ::,i,, i ; ,`'0,: ��? { 't;_ El a.l "is 1. .d.:' ,1.$dA •y:; ••