Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-316 ...-14,.. .-„.„ _,,,, --. T....- - -71,-2 ,.-7- . : --1 ., ,- . ,,',1,-0-!.°417.i-* . • ,-7,57m1.1•:".1.,;44,.‘...;44.,"1„a4.4&,. ,,..:.,3.. .. ..,. ,,.: . .,,,,,e .J,•-•;;. ; 1,v,, .--,,,.1, . ;;„.'-r• • ,----•-.. ,,,piit.11,.-.'v,••••,..„,:'- .1'4-,;;,,;.-it,iri•17-;,;:-.,-,.;;;- ,,;•-• - -‘4,-1-- •- --•,------ •,•- 1,I,ii ..,. - le "..- ''le '4... : - .';',..- • 3. '. -, ;::, - ' ,...”,:',.., ga,. ......,4—' -.3.-",...3. ".... -.: -,,:a • .-• ,s., -7 - .4t • 0..,,,...;,:- ,..-...,..,..;', . ...4,r.i.', .,,,.,74.„...4'..,..g.:-.;;V"Ik''',.,',;4'.,,k,.\::..''',.fts;'-',0/...":"•,.. ;,"-.',';-•''C'' 1:-f.-4;•:,...177-- .;,,.. ,..*.',''''4'''''' or '''.,.. '.-4. ';':.tit'J',4,4''••..,: •i 7 ..-;61: ri .,'..,-...- ' ;'•---: '‘',` ' 3.--''''11- ..,.'-..,aicit,,elAl'I' 3,-;*-,'."-- - .'-. .4.A:',4:44;;;',.1 ‘,",..•• ?..F, - ..,.diV.,s. ''ity...:..;.,.'' s.), ''0.'' .4!''',.`'-s.V'q.•k.,.,:',. ..'AI it.'...:sa'..., 'i,,' .. - —,,,.'1,7',,, • ;...'s. 's2.-^1.' %'7;:-..,-. ''..'''-'-..' ' --••'• - • --. • 4„,,T,-- kp it .4'''. ' .'''‘ ?%'' ''n.' . ''''''' ''' '''..7- .-...."'' " ' . ' -.: ' i '• .• , """htz"7, '-'tfti'' ' • -r-,•••-4.-.-44,; y.i. -- ..----•-• tic ..-- ,-,.,,5v,..-.,-,1.•,- i•-‘:,,-.4' ,,...-:,.., ....,,,',,,,t,r,4- --...•c,.'A." '''-',...-iiir„..1„,..,..'...' .,...?:',...'-f`. ....f.'''' :'---wf - • ',- '' ".... , - ' •' ', ''-`4`:".----,/,',.. • - - .--• -.-.... • :.,-.'*1- -,':'', -. '..i't•,. ,-,,, 4,----',''.,':.4--..- ,.;. 1 .rit .. •-• -....1„.,,,:- ,,04.-... • .„,.,--,77.rr',...2.=.,.. p.„ ,...4,-:.,44,Ar..,, •,. .. ,,.. .,., -. ,,,. ..z.,.,, ..,,..;,,.,,,,,,,*-,.., „,•= , , .4..., •.. ,, 'i.o„.,,,.,,, rr ..R.,,-.r.;....' . ''e''..:'NI.f"-X.‘4;,'-.'-'--..3,-, fr..'"'''"''''' '''- .. — '-'''-- '-'''''''''.•- ' ''' ' ".• .".- - 7r.X"-.- ''' ist 94 lit .1.,..‘" : - '...1.' ---4.--.44.i,'„•".. •' . ' .,--fr.'....-: ;/..1.1.:,•,.••••••ilt•,,- ' •-n. .e.".,.t.:•.....,;-.Z...,*,,,,,,--ik . ',•-„,,... :. , .... ,7,.;!.:;;1,44,,k,..„,-....4.,,...,-•::.... 4 ,--•-•.;‘,..;„:••,k,•.,...e.,.*.1, 1 ..:-. ''."•.,,-,,.,.1-,,.,.. •.'.. '.,:•,..2e.4-,' ,,.4;24..,„ ••,-, .;41f,".4e•• ''4,........".•"• ••• ',- ...-' ' :;-•• .„ t•-,,..V" .; ' •,„4.- '• •••. 1-11-,::1 ‘-."?,,••"%•..1...k..1,, , ,.. :„:„„.„:....,., .',49'',-.4+' -A^&•-.ks ,:-.i..t.!''' ' . '''''''' ' ' . . ' ....'- . ‘• .' ' '''•;. ' ••• ';,?. ,t'''''''''• s'''.4 • ':XSO'',7'r'''' '-:' : '...`,.,.; ., ..'.-A.: :,,--,T;,,:,,,...-1,.,,,--..• ..,,,-„ •,,,,T -7.,...1,-,,-,„54 ;.., • .•.. c.-...•-. .-... .. ;-...,,,,,i i.. ..i.;-:.--..•••••• ••••••4"- • '`.'' ,',-- ',,' ' ''‘.1' *--'.,4 t.4") - - 'A:- '''`C.::''''..". .,',,,'.7'''44.'''' •...,7,.',',:11.4'..' •' ',,,r •';.;•,-,r; -,-,;:'.1,'',15';';'.:•-.'`,':;,...r.,....7 ..:,:i-‘...,, : ...,-„:.,,:a-' ,,r..."'",', •,';,-4-';','..:,....,:;,-..7,...):,-'4'.',,!',..,--`,,4. ,,i,,..„,,,,i,•,,tiF...0;,N,? .• '.'.' ..,!'l L''','''''':)-'4'•L''A' '.;,A,'"1.1.1''''''''.i.pii.''lk ,,^4'7',:eg..r '-i:::•' . '-'--.;-'t. , -i.,;', ,--.)".'-':.-P,..* ' -1,,,A,?'',-• '''.---29::i'ft '.. ',,-'.- 4.:7(.4 ij...iM;'0'..:.v4, z' -,,,. ,I,V... :./i,i• ,-.--,..^:,,i',.,'. - ''' "-''' ,,'" --i'r," ''r 4',. r. •r• 4i -;11-;,4,;-',. r,,,, ...,-,. .,- ,,,,-•.r,i.-',,•'," .f i,r.Y.eiV4-•;-,',.• k!,:.',., ,.:-.•••ei,,,,,- ,....:.,-..- ,.,„,:;.)(--.t..7.1:',..rom,t f.,.-...1:4,,` -. .1,,,, -<,4'.',4,,,',';f4-.-,'.`. 5.., , .010:'t...41,....*2-,,,,- "',,,,,..;,. . ....„!-,•;„,,,,,It.;',:n ,"..". .:!.-.:- -: %'41-'!--.:ti.----.:4",,,,,??,-...1,1,,e',..,' ..,-,..,.„A,0,14.,..i v•,,;t.-.01t5:,-;;;.,4,,,,..-,,i4:44-i.,...41. ,.: ..i.--., ,.•.:-.:,..-:•:,t,.... ,,t,,--rki -St..,-•:;`,4,-. 0 !- -,, ••-.•,..-,,',,,-;:,..... .- •,‘ !it'4....•-•.4,,,,;,',.,.,.•,,.„,rtrip ',-.4'.,-v-,. ' 4,FL.'re:'.:.,;Y..W',f. '..i'4!.'.' T,`..p,‘;- .:4,' ,,INS.1.0 ,,''1",;.L.d ---.0,-• ' '''' • eilqinTe;44.- .‹.;•'''• , '.;',',4 , .. ' )'• •iy. • .1 ,tt,- . • . v: 4!if.,.*,1. -,. _f, ,,...i -,?-.-,i,!,,r,,i ..,,, , ..,,s- -,- -., ,...,., . ..-,,-,-,..,....,z,,,'.; ,,,i;,;b,,,. .;‘,.,..., ,.,-;'--,,::.-,., ...,„7, „ -,,,, t.,., ,,, -0 ..P.::.'i''.!: It.!,_.7'..'7,4F ''"ir 4,ti• ".:4(;',. ;,'.,,,,)ifi/444,".L''''''.',±''''' •':'' fr, .,' n`-:- .;1 4%,14'?r,,,,i,li-:.-,- % ..,.;''q','1; ': ' •.--).,,'?',-,;.',"'fj:al.'.tilk-, -. .;,.-, ;,,,.i. -..:4;•-,•••,.;;,":"A,:;,,,.....-;` ..• ..::-...'sr.,.:-•,,-•,,,, T.-'-:'-it. -' - .••*T 'fr.:*•*** * ••••:"-; {'lit. '''..".47%.:- „,s'+?..rfr„',,,p,,.., '• ,-.••'..t ,10TpOriN,•,.?;tii,, 4'-•:'-',":-''''%'*,',!,;•:. : - ,', -!,At.,,ielt0. A i;,' ,-,.- , ,.-... --.•• •.., . •--1,,,:•.;;;;,,i4..;,t,*i-.2'.,..,t..:,,,,i,,,i-,:„„-:-.•;...,,,,;-., --,,,4014:- -,.4-,; •, .'f',".4:,,:,:',','.,`,.,„ • ,,;„N7'...k.3- }".• 4 • 14,-..‘,..s.' -,',..' 'r-;._,.... , '1.:, '',..'',4„.„ a-$4,,%-.a-• .7.4 ' ,.., .5-,.-..:,:... -.", ... . ...,?..4..a.' ,.---„7„.'..:,...--,.A;,::'' ',',,I,L,..`,.'.'s:.'14 et,fr,e .-• 4‘111.• -"'4''. y.-.4..4.-i,-.,.ilt ., *,, ;frz.'-'4-''` ..•:;"••14,:,,,,••...'.'..'NM,,7,.' -4:4';''.',. .'es-2,':,-',4441.-j.• 4 41 , .. ..,: ,,,-.:. .,,-.4 t.1,"'.2,1,'• 2 5 ..„,,,..„ . -,,,,,,--F.,-.‘;:•„'4"..-•---,ft!....8fr, .:,, r 14::, .f .4;'• ‘•5, ltor'744,14"4 v.,...1...,.....e.,,,...*. I,17,-..1,,.;:.,''.''.;: , ih,el•,...'",'"?' ,. OAT,1,1,_ - : - -: '. -!,:..C.:;',,' ip,,...-' .,y,,.- 1:1,‘,C .,f•...., -•1;1.-,',',....4,'W.,‘;',•• 1.'''445'''f'*!!4"';'1.r.'t" )'":115V1*.t&f*: ,1--.''',.•'4'' ."''.;•,2tIr '"'..).'4,4 ''''' I''' '' ' ' ''' ,1‘,FT,.. .4 - • ., ,,". - •,, , . , 1:•-•"''''14'‘..ii-','filffirt 1'.4.1''",i.....;-'wuk,._,..,,,•„,04.,,s,..,, ? '-'....!'-'-'',..w• ....-*',. ,-,•,,,• -•-•64,,,,„A•N,.k ,, ''''''',,',..'",„,4,11* --s;:•;';',Irt,'!xii-',-'4 ,*VT.*-I•'•-', ''''''''''-• ' --*04', 1 ,..•-,.. 4..7.-;.1,4.,;..., . • -,-34/-t. . Itif•-i,,,,-..-.., i.t. ;,,,,,4--- ,.-,,,,,,i,el ... ; ..• 4=,;r-N-1,;•-,,,,..` .. ...,;,;'4,,,,4-..,,,c-.:-.4.4.5.,,•,.-A,..7....%,_,-.,.- ,....,....., .(;.,',,,.1,">4._ .'•".• ,-,--t. •40',;,•':,,,,V-,,,it;• ,,‘,..,,,e, ,-,4 1,,,Ar,,,r , ,,,,:: -r,ert.. -, :41,:,: ,„,.•,,,,.....4...1,-,;:.• i..,1_ ,..,r,,,,;'•%..,,,..1k .....,.:„.1,:I,,,,i: .,,,i...„..... , , • atil-i),,,,,,,... .„,,;......4,,...,.,.......„,„1.,,,..;,,,,...,-,..s 0 r--.....,,,,j',NI.,.,.- -ir-... ;• ' _„r 4,,,,,..,...4,r,l,wr.,- ......1. .i;4 ,,,,a3i...„..:t, 1-.A,... .4.•4,141-„„ci .,:,.a A.7.,,,-Itr:•• 0...",".i.7,......14.„:4,,7".-...".-iii,..„,.,. ,<_,, ..,".:4t.-,- la,.;$t, :.:: ..,, .'„".„."7-.....,-,..,,,-pf.,„--„.. ..------,...,,,,.:.;4,-.-:,.-4'4,. .... -......k.e.5.4 ,'-'.. -*'74§,•.?; ",Ti--114';Igt,-0.1 -.ir • . '''''''', ''''''''.,0,' let4:111431.4:.'1,-•,„'-'.''.,.•-•!... .,,p ',:':-.',','" .Mr-.;Aii."-,2-... „,. '''...f.lk..:.. '..! '',',,".'.7.73.7"tv.Z7.10"1/4,--..."..-f:-',.:,-'1'•',.;„y.,.','0-::-..: ,' ''.:g4P.r.t;'' -„ .-. ''.. ''X'',K4i4Z--•,,,Z1.;',).!',''• 'tr.."4 ,, ,'-'.-"- '-,_*„ A,.,'•.,' ,.,i,i_,,ri....,... .31'Wir:ty :', ' ;-it":.',,k.s:!••-,t 1 .1,:'..s5.1•,t,;;Of.t,''',r ;7 ,.,-, •,,,,,,..,ay.,,,;:-. )-ii.v.,- . -, -- .--..- - . ,/ •••,-, ..- ,---.1.-..-r.. , '. fwit.,,,,';,=.:' -:•';-4' fr ..;,-,•. .,,TA.4.60ij.,,.... 04•Rw.,....,tl.„•,,..*,-.•'.,,-;,;6.;;,...• tii:A,--1.'1.,,,:.,.--.1.,, -..,,, . -.'--:?•,,,t,..,f••.';'•''',-i;:,,..V-Ii:tt..".;•., *.,,-..,.,,--,•"--.:•-; ,.. `''',.••:::.--t.,t?- ',...,./0'.'. •:-''2.K. ,- -L.;.***.'''..;4k-'r4' '''.'fil,'':'''!''14 4'' ''''''*.5T-f—'' ''' ''''1'fr`-02'..c---"-•T*'''''',4 , •-" --;234•911. ,•-''': . ----.-.'-,•.-.',....4..,..'0....tt.),...A.4-1. ,,,',4),".....1..-''' ,-„',,,,,.g,-'i:-.,it,„7.,.14r. • :‘..,.4,a...,,,.., , *, ,.....,-," „,,,,Sj. _ ••,, -....,.,,p,,,,,,, 4 r:- 't,' NO:-" -t - ;- --;',-... ',.--- -y.' ''-t-'-'..-2 ,-----' ti.,.., --,%,. -,-,,4;,-11-0,..w.,-- .0 -..,':-,,,-...,.-4, •1'.., ' .r.41-,a-,...,.-.=,.,..:44,,,,.../r ,',4 -.tie „.t..k•47,45 tilt, il-f"':'-f-;;S?,.,,,,z-"4... ''A'''''-'2„i''5W4!'7'-': •'''-.•''.2';',7'' ....... ''.:'...:-''.:'1.4',,,, -.t.,,, ,,, ',Z4',,,... ' .1 .•.,,.•.. - ' ; - --`,'*..:',;.'..-..'-,kai..'•->4 .....,,:, -.-.i.:,, .,-,..:‘, T ,:v=,,,,,, .n*4. , ,,,,,..,,. . .,,,,,c,,,,44,,v, -,.... .: ,...-,....rk, .,.4. , ,ii.,,,,,, 4, '0, .. -- ''''',,",.-; ,- ".'!"..".7..",-'-4 -z..4,,,W.:•-:",'!'3'.,-h" . .- '4'%!‘":L• 4" 6 Av.':..'.".6,`6,r-'''a- , 0;".4'!""----;".•'‘.-K..:.-, , ::,. .at'..-.., -f- --$. '4;47- tt3re'-i,t3,:-:".'la',, • '' ,'.''' . ito- -, ---..40,'N'il' • ..7',,tritl''';.7,-,.• • ;••,!,,6,.....`c.`..*, . ,t,-. .-,' ,-.'..-tr'7'• -:- •'.!',-.-..t.'•..-.4 s',-17,',-,-:`L' -,-,-,., '1&-,:-....,ew.:•.'''',,:''• •''. ,•,•,1 40.- '.*!• .t." ., ., .7"''',' ' 'N i A. . s.i.k,I.,.1,-.,.. -''.. .;;W•2,' s '''•- ,., '..,..,,i,4, 4.114,„i. 7r.....,1....'' '....*'!:1.4''''''' .::-V,.''''. '-':' ' . ....'cit..'.•'" ' w ., . -,' .'" • '.... .i a.a ' . -',' - :'-' -:"' to 4#4.'- . c ":- 1...;,-' .4.;•• ' i;,,!•''-'.'-'‘k*i',X11-4,. ,_ s. Ri. t.,5.7,,-4.4,- .1,W.tr..-,4•44.;‘,. n. .: - ,r.,,-''. -,'' '..1.:-i.'_,.(7,,,,";', ' . -.•!--!---. .-",,.1. „. .. '''. . .3.5.-.0,4....''-.-...... .-. ',,..,, ,L ,;•.i ..::'' ..-Siti 0.•,.., ..b...;;..,!;,c4f,.47 • '. • '•'>-• .4-, ,• .'-;; .' ..L._::—• '..' .—...-- -. ._‘, . .. —.7.--...„ --,--,' . 7 .,,..20.:.. q.bi:;??,,.';,-'--,-'w ,,, 4.., .'",;.1?V,,;?-.),,i' ',,,,PIT • ,, ,..;*.....,:c t ,..',,,'',.,f,,,., C,:, ,,, .''.:.', : ' ,,,,',,,.' - '..' '''',,L.,, .., ...i.1..'.1":.....,',4,'',,...'.., ‘1:,‘T.-I:: ''..f.-s:,,. ...' ' .,,‘ Y''1,'":lit,•;:.:,10,4U41.1%, '',X,'':' :rk:g....'-'4*:''.'1,7 • '- ,-;.fi,'44,l'.4,t.,',b • :`r•'‘-..'''•I'',-" ''ligit3 644i' ' ''', = ' • - -''',...`;-'re'. '''...i. A '- - -'. :- :. .-‘• 'I,,'•. -.-2,4,.31',..,;‘,Vs:,,,..,•*•:,`' •,`',',...Li•- 44,A,.. ,i..ii:•.'-', . ..mifeliet,o.. 1!--4;4-f- si'.''''''',"' -- - .- .,'`'"'. ... - •2.40 -'''i 3.'"."'''',:, , ''-',$.- - :.' , - .$-"...,',),.:. : ..„4,,-9-----., . • i-..,, ----. • -• -•,,,''''',.,-,, 1•N4:',4,'''-,.,„,;4:,;',"i :'''''..,-.,'-.T".' ,;,-4,''•*..""--•4*•4•.* ''''I .J.ri:V•- •."'''"-.:'V'',C../'''.,.'7;'-f` ' 3',...-'..t, • • . '''''' '''''4,':'' ;1' ;- '' ' - •:: .• ' . " I, '•t%\‘11s ,'' .-,'. - ',/x'. ',r•-•••t.; ..;,,,<;-?. - :1'•. -tif4.,Itet, i.. ,- .,, - - • ,-4.•;/,‘,„;:•. ,,4•...... .,•_.,..,r,„1.•••••1-„,,,,,,,, .,*,,,'..1 '., ,' ,, - ,,t;;, •, -. .:„ . ,,. . ?,k.,+.: .r,,:" • "A: - ' . ' ' . • . '-- ' ' . :--7*-- -". ------7'77-?4:.,;•%; ? ', :''';- ' 't, •••*.•-j.'. '-4:4'• '.1r.;'.‘"ZIA ,..-.•4*'-'1,,/,' ,,,, r' '-• "'''.''...74,4.,,,,,,',P41.-,.. r-4' 4, ' •'-' '' .', ' ' .-- - , . I ' .- ''-' - -•-•, .•,i .-• ,,,.. , .4 . -..,`-1.-.,-,,,,.j.;., •1 •ty- __,' ..;,-;.-;;.:1:, .. .•, - -.IT'-'..1,-", 1;;;;!... . ., . ' ,.. .,' •' , r.r:'....7,, .,5.0::: :::',;.c.e:Zt'''.7- '..'i,L t3,$) .• , .,_. . .,.' ' . . . ' - -- ...-- 1"--- -..i'''',0 r 7W,",,rx‘r".0‘ia1'''.'Af..-r it-,..;4,-,-f,,,,•.......0..,../it '''*,'''-'.- .:,.. ..., ''r:•.--1::,,i-4' ''';" T''7:,-;','• "':''' ',''•' . '':''''',7 '.:.'''.. '''' '' ' ' ' '. '' ,- -.• - r"*.':4j".' ..ixt-fs.,..44"; ,.',,:•,---.- .1-,e';6-4•,1,:,,es.x:i.1, .•:z...••-1- -_,;., ,,-.:1,i,..,.--7c) ' .,.• - ...,. •. • , • .: , ,...,. . . - • . ° ,•• ,•.47k.,-'....--,i,?- 1 .4,,,.".,:;4.1'.i,<,44%•'t .)tf,),i,T.4‘,„.„44 ,, s ..''.,-',- , ..;•7 '-;,'..,,;„ ,„: -' . . ,' '''..'A. . ,- • ' $41 ' — 6, , .. ,, , kt',;-- ':41'4 ti ')*.17fr.•'.'••;1: '2*' 0' -',,,;.40,1V-foxi ,i,..,-,47...'7-, , '. •.:' ,,.',„ ,,,,... Q.-tc:,-- .s ,;. ..... .. .:,, . • ''""'1 L 4 ' ...•••.,p,.1.-,..1?...-<•:. ,. •-•.:,, ,,;,,,. f ,.. .,•.•:,•:'...-.'",'... -,,::',..;,.,f-1., i•'.. 7,.U..2.,,,4E,,,- E. - A_4-.z.4. ,•;...,1--.. .,.s '' 3;3 "7 7_20. c p.... p.,r? 3 — -,- ....$r-:9. Eg rit-•ip* , •r, ..-..• ,...!.-...." . - lt . . ... .: .-'' .2 ,. -,/: 41, ... •• f' . • i '-..ft.-- ' .4'•-1, . .,:.• '• ' .*:l'• '-- - ' I; .; • , - t - , ,... -i , , , •3., " , '.1.,„,s, ...- ' '....,:'. .. ''..-. - ‘::',r."‘..:,,',l' t .., ?, •." ' . ti", '414; ..,,,,..1.,-;.'7,'•N ,,-.),...',,,,r,.',..'4,.,' t '. A --'',''X 4''.:%' • '- ' ... -. :,..,-.,;.,....... 1 ' . ' - '1 . -...'1.,.,f...•-..k, ,t.'';..,- . • , .-- ' * .‘-6 's •••i . '' .- -$..a 6t. i':- : •,d, . , • 4':‘,/,‘','„? '''', • !,;‘,"-,,zt,,,,,..'.••••.,< i 4 ,' 1 . ' , 4 Zi • ' ; 4:` ' •L'.,,iiitipbe' ' ,A.,k-4.4'... '-'4•V••••- J..-": J _, • •,41 ' ,,. - ...:*, . , ':,CitiltrIA4(.- '..,_. 4c r•';'4', ..fo„. . ,,,. ,,,4 ,_ X`''-.,•:,':r*4k7,-;.:1-- '--'). '%:•'-',', ''''' :•*- ' - ', .0,-—r . 4;4 ' -1.(2)446-' .:„....,Ttp (,. i :7,..- • I' . 7 ,•,..„ (..,0 -', v,- t - r-----lt ,r•IN., ,.. ,,,Ot:W k,,,; .. ...7",110'-,.. •r-T. ,m,iimmi, . - /I - . .••••••••• • - . .0•••••••• ,...,... 0„. ., 7,,:?,.04 ,t..i.4,0c :..„ otte:.+7, -----.-"" 7-2 k „,,,-,...,,,,, .77-• , ,--, 7g • --, ;,- ,;1;,..,,-,,, -;.„, =I, , -,..3aa-, ..... '1, 's ''..:!'4,-,$ s'''ellii * ''s,',Xle.ez ',,, --- .• . . 'p , ' • : •...:.-.,- ''',., •, ••••:, -0.-K-..,„7.04,;.*'' .-,..,4.,•-.' •. /9'0/ \ i'lt ., •.. 4 1- . 1„ 7 r'''` . . .. '.• 6 N et, . \t, .... ka, .*•' - .443 too '• •4 , n..(r1 ..,_ ,... -:, 1,, •,4 - N t• ' „*'''''''t '' •••'' 'ar* •in t 41 ' .-..., '4fr * -''' 4;04-‘,.-g-'.- ‘';.---••,,,aat',4:-. ..-. ......,-.. . ; .,,„, 14 j), ... . - ' •tt(10.4,t iik,,,,'...."5t1T,,-..,11A1,-,-i,tr-,F;.;.,.,,I..«,-,,, *4 -I *' , 14. -L._.,O.,',.A.it„ri .. .' ,r11' til'916; 4. . • .t 1?;),!6:,. :.;,•, e..:•,,, ..A,,.14, 1,,e -49110't 2 c=:7t'. ... • -V..!..1 ' *,-;1•:, ,..a,, _k___:.k7, .-,--,,...... .. -14.7,> . ....--._.ij:rt...., :."-:-.4,.flt-r-":..1,-.,;-'''W.,r,.;:.',...7,.'.';';.2"---14,-3:4.•;,-..A..,,6 . ",.'. - ..V.'*''''';'4140%44."'$:0,+•'-'iitia) , ': °.. . ' . -11 E,DMO KID ' • .. ..' AVE. . • 'N . ,1_Y___6,,c'...'..17... Y.f',':'. -.,-';",..•••6",',.-.".,-,,k. ,-..,-..sF',',.7.*'v',,,4,.,',.,....0,.;-,',.,'e.s..-. ...4 - 147.8,t-,:: ' ' . ,. ' ':' -: , -NI4 (N. : . • . '''r' . ' '''.. ' ' ' '' , .. , ,, 4,,,f,,,:ii;f4r..'::fiY, .7.1'; ,'''TV '", 'el .0''' .' - ' .0-4 379" . aff.-36' ' - ,' ' t'1)4 < • 4: ‘',:"P'' , - 7):2 • -,,,, 1, iG. •' ,, ' , ' . '.**,.„,4,"?.''-;.21 7,.,2.;r'''..'-)4",$.."-';':"..,---.;.4 i.!:: ', ''" .-..,.',/!"_',.:,;),,,."2._,i,,,_, „zia4.1,. i..... .,.,..,-(b. , 4.1`.4i, . . ,t 1 , . -V%',.s.0 _ -,,„.!. . . ...-, „--. .‘ -, _,.*..‘. . , AV, ..11,:li.,.,,,,,,,,, ,...•,•,1-, ,,i;,f,,•,2,,.,,,,;e„-A- -_,1,. 6e., ,..., t .e. ,,- ,...,. 0 ,..,.., .. ,-. . . :,. . *- 4+••'7'.. , • ' . ' , •. ft'; -**,..'34044,,,, .!.. , ',.V..? ,, cp_ , i:,,...„...),s.:.,,,,l..,,:. ,S ..:.•.--r,4.1.s'.' . • ')5; c''t-(4,`,I.,. .,'''';. ;,.. .,: % .1 C, . \ '11r4.41.. !Ott A---k •,,.. ...:.: • . \ g ".. • • - 4'.: . '.. (A- • 6, ' .'- '"- - 7' ',..4,v,iii•••••4', -- ' .... , t ' '1Z ' . - ' ' ' -- ' - 4 44 •SC .1* ' . * - ' • . \'' - ,.. tt t,, , ' , Iv. , 'C..'lit',•- .0 '-",T,',..f,:."',‘ .-,: '......,!-J .. :,>al !Ikk "..1._ ..,... ‘' : -'N t' •• ••-::NI 0' .-- , • t .•'.: '.'.'‘ ,.','.., %., ,. '. r,.. ,,. :,',^..-4,,, • '4, 4,.lis, ,,,, , , . .tie , g - .t‘.. , vl . ,„,-1, _. •.s 11, -.(.1.,;., , .t ...--:-.---y. i ''0,6 *, ;", , '. ...`'/...l'.•::44"'... :., ..-"ir,,' ..1 :: .., op.3 relt,. ....,..7-. • ....tu. , - , -, . . , i. 41a4.' 'y ; , : . . ..4.^-,,3\.‘ .1,...x.,:z i 1/t\'-'ca„::. (j4.,1131-0--'''''''."..-"N*7-7- %. -. ‘44. ..-7 !4. ..'1 . ,'' •,..;''' '' -r-1-''likttl; -•-• ' - -•-•" - .,'' '...,`,•;"- ...It ' .., '. ,,,,, il 1 ' uo . . , ' . • x, — - , * il ' 4 ., ...:,-- • r.voi,,144,.,•••e: '4• RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting May 14 , 1979 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P . M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the Renton City Council meeting to order. ROLL CALL OF BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Council President; CHARLES F. SHANE, THOMAS COUNCIL W. TRIMM, EARL CLYMER, GEORGE J. PERRY, MARGARET L. PROCTOR AND RICHARD M. STREDICKE. ' (Councilman Trimm arrived at 8:10 p.m. ) CITY OFFICIALS CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , Mayor; W. E. BENNETT, Deputy Finance PRESENT Director; LAWRENCE J . WARREN, City Attorney; DEL MEAD, City Clerk; GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, Planning Director; JOHN WEBLEY, Parks and Recreation Director; MIKE PARNESS, Administrative Asst. ; WARREN GONNASON; RICHARD GEISSLER, Fire Chief; CAPT. JOHN BUFF, Police Department Rep. MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND PERRY, APPROVE COUNCIL MINUTES OF 5/7/79 May 7, 1979 AS WRITTEN. Councilman Stredicke objected to inclusion of request of Councilman Shane for inclusion of his NO vote - Page 3, Para- graph 2; Stredicke noted request came later in meeting. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, Right—of-Way posted and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the Vacation Public Hearing to consider petition for vacation of right-of-way VAC-6-79 filed by A. Daniel Dansereau; signatures on petition certified by East Valley Public Works Department as representing 100k of the abutting prop- Medical Short Plat erty. Letter from Board of Public Works Chairman recommended West of Talbot Rd. that petition be denied at this time due to number of problems South of S.37th on the plat still unsolved; that vacation is premature. The letter noted applicants have been requested to work with the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments to resolve problems . Public Works Director Gonnason used wall map to explain area (former Pope property) and explained development was indefinite; roadway was condition of Hearing Examiner that it be dedicated as City street. Discussion ensued regarding development to differ- ent use than at time of subdivision. Upon inquiry, Fire Chief Geissler explained no means of ingress or egress from S. 37th (with tree in access from Talbot Rd.) for proposed three story medi- cal facility. Planning Director Ericksen advised property zoned P-1 and recalled history of development of property noting res- trictive covenants. There being no public comment, MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND STREDICKE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. CARRIED. Vacation Denied MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND DENY VACATION. ROLL CALL: 5-AYE: SHINPOCH, TRIMM, CLYMER, PROCTOR, STREDICKE; 2-NO: SHANE AND PERRY. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been published, Street Vacation posted and mailed according to law, Mayor Delaurenti opened the Portion of S. 6th Public Hearing to consider vacation of a portion of South 6th East of Mill Street east of Mill Ave. S. as petitioned by Stirsky Holdings Ave. South Ltd. ; petition having been validated by the Public Works Department VAC-8-79 that signatures represent 94% of the property abutting that portion of S. 6th St. Letter from the Board of Public Works reported this street is not necessary for traffic circulation; the City will require retention of easements over the entire 40 ft. The Board recommended 1/2 of the appraised value of $1 .40 per sq. ft. be charged abutting property owners. Audience Comment: Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. , noted property in vacation area is expensive, that City should realize more revenue. Also Mr. Webb requested 20 ft. setback be reserved for turn- around needed for switchback on Mill Ave. near Chalet. Kathy Koelker, 532 Cedar Ave. S. , noted R-3 area and asked for the additional space for "U" turn on Mill Ave. S. ; asked that drainage be provided; that no variance be given for parking • pee .3®t.77 4404; 41444600P Renton City Council 5/14/79 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING - Continued Street Vacation requirements; that consideration be given to maintain alley access S. 6th St. to west of vacation area. Public Works Director Gonnason noted East of Mill S. alley not dedicated right-of-way; Councilman Clymer noted it has been in existence for a lifetime. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECOND BY CLYMER, CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO MONDAY, MAY 21 , 1979. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Sandy Webb, 264 Chelan Ave. SE, inquired re "Scared Straight" program for young offenders and noted statistics proving the Scared Straight value of program is questionable. Mayor Delaurenti noted the Police Department did not favor showing the film. Traffic Request Kathy Koelker requested follow up of 2/5/79 request for repainting of traffic divider lines at Grady Way where 3 lanes narrow to two. Mrs. Koelker inquired of research into conflict-of-interest for City employees not doing business with City after leaving employ. Conflict of City Attorney Warren explained that no such law is on the books Interest at the present time. Versie Vaupel , 221 Wells Ave. N. , favored proposed legislation and reported possession of copy of the Federal law enacted which will be in effect 7/79. Recess MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL RECESS. CARRIED. Council recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:18 p.m. All Council Members present at Roll Call . OLD BUSINESS Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee Surplus Fire report recommending the subject of surplus fire truck be referred Truck to the Public Safety Committee. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND STREDICKE, CONCUR IN REPORT. CARRIED. Utilities Utilities Committee Chairman Shane presented report (bearing Committee Report only his signature) recommending the income level for reduced utility rates for qualified users be set at $9,600 per annum for Utility Rates the head of a household. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND PERRY, REFER for Senior SUBJECT TO THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE. Councilman Shane Citizens inquired of Deputy Finance Director Bennett re loss of revenue to the City and was advised of $2,000 to $3,000; also that annually City's present ordinance adjusts low-income level with Social Security rates and reflects increases; effective 7/1/79 $5,200 for single and $7,900 for married couple. MOTION CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented prog- Development ress report noting review of Comprehensive Plan, Goals and Policies Committee Report and referred the matter back to the Planning Department for Comprehensive Plan inclusion of suggested changes submitted by each committee member. Pleliminary Plat Planning and Development Committee Chairman Perry presented Brentwood Park committee report noting consideration of Preliminary Plat for the Appeal of Brentwood Park Addition (PP-316-79; E-317, E-318-79) and Appeal Decision by Bel Terra Development Corporation; property located at NE llth PP-316-79 St. and Pierce Ave. NE; Hearing Examiner's decision dated 4/13/79. E-317-79 The report recommended that the City Council modify the recommenda- E-318-79 tion of the Hearing Examiner to delete Condition Ho. 1 to the W-319-79 approval of the preliminary plat as submitted, and in all other respects to adopt the recommendations of the Hearing Examiner, based upon the following errors of fact and law: (1 ) Finding #6e is in error in that the quoted ordinance sections do not require a set back of 100 ft. in the case of undeveloped, property being developed adjacent to a church; (2) Conclusion #8 is in error for reasons noted above. MOVED BY PERRY, SECOND SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONCUR IN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT.* Councilman Perry noted the church has to be 100 ft. from property line. Councilman Shinpoch noted error in law as advised by City Attorney. Councilman Stredicke noted protest by five adjacent property owners at public hearing; that action reduces Queen Ave. to status of alley and it changes the Citv's arterial street system by action of Hearing Examiner and City Council and requested record indicate protest. *ROLL CALL: 4-AYES: SHIfPOCH, PERRY, TRIM, PROCTOR; 3-NO: STREDICKE, CLYMER, -SHANE. MOTION CARRIED APPROVING THE BRENTWOOD PARK ADD'N PRELIMINARY PLAT AS MODIFIED. V+ PMENT GO MMITT EE •. -. " `;D I30`PLANNING;:;'°ANb`.. CO MMITTEEREPORT„ . :i ".,BRENTWOOD,'_-PARK;;ADDITION'' PRELIMINARY'::°'PLAT .AP.PEAL: The ;Plane ng and Development Committee:, has3 considered the appeal . of the:°:above�ment,ioned;! decision '.date.d:. April 13 :•;I9:79,: and. ,re commend :. . s'".;;that ahe :City�•,�Cbunc� 3:� i�iodi_fy, The::.recommendation of..,the`::'•_- Hearing Examiner':to; :de:le.te,'„Condi,ti:on .No:. ,l ' to..,the "approval of .the preliminary plat.; as'`..'submitted,: and.,in" all -other respects. to eco • ���o£:'-ah�e::Heari:ng.,Examiner; . based upon" a.he , mmendations, followir g:..errors:':of.''fact -.and Yaw d nan e or i c `n what: .the iote'd .; �1; - ,:F>nclin o`.:+:'6`e s':"-zn'': e a• `q sections:-do`::not:'re �uuire: a:i set:`�back`.:.of I00 feet in the . �e-.:of.•?un•developed, _.. ' <-':' -.. ��propertyr° eng:�<<_eve''' ope a jacen -. .,._,.. , '.•to+ a church. r • ..-.'..Conclusion. ..8." ' "'� : ::.: .w,,+;r.,,� .. , .. -' 2 is° i�n'`;_=error;`for 'the- reasoiirs' ;:"rioted above. • :4 ti 1, G:eo ge` Perry., ` Chairman /. Barbara'.:::Shin+posh , Earl .Clymer .'Y , ... .. .,. . rt:r l �j�,�'� y`'`a`, y/ „ p ] ,✓1 �, £' `T''.f ': ,�%'::....-C.rr.•C••�':,+•"�C.l%..:.i�": ^'b:...C:� "t� • .f r. Y 'r�T. �i 4 •"tom .fir OF R� C.) 50 OFFICE OF THE CITY.ATTORNEY. RENTON,WASHINGTO ®/ ott POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON.WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 aelL ` . o C1 .� ' 4• °' LAWRENCE I.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITYATTOR6 0 CO' May 2, 1979 :�= �' +" �9TFD SEPSEM /At34 r i To: Members of City Council and s h� �•.N �� , Members of Board of Adjustmentco_ )' 45.' �� \1 From: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney v� Re: Bell Terra Preliminary Plat File No. PP 316-79 Y The above topic has been referred to my office for comment and opinion, primarily at the request of the Board of Adjustment. From the facts as I now know them, St. Andrews Church was built prior to the enactment of Ordinance No. 3101 passed and effective in January of 1977. That Ordinance requires a church to have a setback on all buildings and structures of 100 feet from any developed residential lot. Apparently the Church had adequate property to meet the setback requirement but has attempted, through the Platting procedure, to divide its property, and thereby creating a situation where one of its buildings is only 25 feet from a proposed residential lot. If the Church's setback of only 25 feet existed at the time of construction of the building, then the setback would be a prior non-conforming legal use. This would require that the parcel of land proposed for development now had presently been separated from the parcel bearing the church building. If not, the Church is attempting to create a non-conforming use and such an attempt would clearly be a violation of the City's zoning regulations. I might note that the setback Ordinance requires the setback from developed lots and the lots in existence are not developed. However, it is my opinion that to create a non-conforming use would still violate the law since the Church is selling to a developer with knowledge that the lots will be developed in the near future. Any violation of the law would be in the original platting and not in the later development. It should be noted that the City will have lost jurisdiction over the matter if the Hearing Examiner's decision on the preliminary plat was not appealed or the particular requirement was not called into question at an appeal. Whether or not the property was properly split into parcels prior to the enactment of the setback requirement in 1977 is a question that must be answered before this problem can be resolved. The City staff is presently looking into that question and should have an answer in the immediate near future. Pending that answer, I would be happy to answer any questions y'O� 'ght have o his matter. La ence . War LJW:nd . cc: Mayor City Clerk. . OF R4� 0 THE CITY OF RENTON „ 0 z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 oemmo ° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER I. `o- L. RICK BEELER , 235-2593 0,9gTE.D SEPT`* April 23, 1979 Members, Renton City Council Renton, Washington RE: File No. PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, E-319-79; Belterra Development Corporation Preliminary Plat Request. Dear Council Members: The Examiner's Report and Recommendation regarding the referenced application was published on April 13, 1979. An appeal of Recommendation No. 1 was received today, April 23, 1979, within the established appeal period. The Examiner's Report and Recommendation as well as the appeal letter are attached for your review prior to placement of the matter on the City Council agenda of May 14, 1979. If you require additional information or assistance regarding this matter, please contact our office. Sincerely, A ' ,:a!,„y„,„9_442e d C'L. Rick(-Beeler / Hearing Examiner cc: Planning Department City Clerk City Attorney Public Works Department Attachments pF RA 4 r �� 7 THE CITY OF RENTON Q .� MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR e DELORES A. MEAD CITY CLERK �4TFO SEP.W' April 23, 1979 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) DELORES A. MEAD, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that she is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Washington, over the age of 21 and not a party to nor interested in this matter. That on the 23rd day of April , 1979, at the hour of 5:00 p.m. , your affiant duly mailed and placed in the United States Post Office at Renton, King County, Washington, by first class mail ,. a true and correct NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED BY BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REGARDING HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION OF PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79 TO ALL PARTIES OF RECORD. Delores A. Mead, City Cle k SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE me this 23rd day-,of April , 1979. Notary Public in and For the State of Washington, residing in Renton st PARTIES OF RECORD: Del Bennett Belterra Development Corp. PO Box 1282 Bellevue, WA 98009 Cheryl Henry Belterra Development Corp. PO Box 1282 Bellevue, WA 98009 Norman Abrahamson 3408 NE 17th St. Renton, WA 98055 Charles & Florence Shoaf 1108 Qtieen`:Ave. NE Renton, WA 98065 Stan Eorickson William A. Jackson 1111 Pierce Ave. NE 3508 NE 11th Pl . Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Larry Kaastad Dan Nomura 1115 Pierce Ave. NE 3188 Sunset Blvd. NE Renton, WA 98055 Renton, WA 98055 Emma Tucker Thunder Hill Apts. #252 1206 Thomas Lane Renton, WA 98055 4 O1 Ft v 7 THE CITY OF RENTON W. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o 8' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® DELORES A. MEAD -)3 (O CITY CLERK 0 � AlTFO SEP- April 23, 1979 APPEAL FILED BY: Belterra Development Corporation 12843 NE 14th P1 . Bellevue, WA 98005 Del Bennett, President RE: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision dated April 13, 1979, PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79. Belterra Development 'Corporation (Brentwood Park Addition) To Parties of Record: Appeal of Land Use Hearing Examiner's decision has been filed with the City Clerk's Office on April 23, 1979, along with the proper fee of $25.00, pursuant to Title 4, Ch. 30, City Code, as amended. The City Code requires the appeal must be set forth in writing. The written appeal and all other pertinent documents will, be reviewed by the Council 's Planning & Development Committee. Please contact the Council Secretary, 235-2586, for date and time of the committee meeting, if so desired. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the above-referenced appeal will be considered by the Renton City Council at its regular meeting of May 14,1979 at 8;00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave. S. , Renton. Yours very truly, CITY OF RENTON Delores A. Mead, C.M.C. City Clerk DAM/st cc: Parties of Record rw.Ir+1Fr6®a� "i` l .a•y 5) vv+ pWuvG-'r:4.r.V,.t.'.,.- 7�i . `(Y1�n ." .CITY OF-'iRENTON to. . 8 8'6 5 . FINANCE' ;DEPARTMENT . RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 ., ' l' , - 19 7 7 RECEIVED OF �,f- _. G(�.P.c 2� .sv1�� G // �i • TOTAL --.2d r GWEN: E'. MARS , .FIN CE ,DIRECTOR n i'_ t 2520 Cid„ APR `v BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ���� � 12843 N.E. 14th PL., BELLEVUE, WA 98005 aIVO �flno E co phone 206-454-0539 C p r'. C � S �A April 20, 1979 11016 g Mrs. Delores Mead City Clerk Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Appeal of Hearing Examiner's Decision File No. : PP-316-79 Brentwood Park Addition Dear Mrs. Mead: Pursuant to Section 4-3016 of the Land Use Hearing Examiner's. Ordinance of the City of Renton, we are submitting our appeal to the City Council for reconsideration of Item 1 of the Hearing Examiner's recommendation dated April 13, 1979. In his report, the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the preliminary plat of Brentwood Park Addition subject to conditions. Condition No. 1, which is the subject of our appeal, reads as follows: "Revision of the southerly property line to be 100 feet from adjacent church buildings, or approval of a variance therefrom by the Board of Adjustment." Section 4-706(3)(a)3 of the City's Zoning Code serves as the basis for his decision and reads in part as follows: "(a) Such lot or parcel of land to be used for church purposes shall, among others, meet the following requirements: . . . 3. Setback. Building and structures shall not be located closer than 100 feet to any other developed lot which is zoned residential. . ." It is our contention that this provision is not applicable in the case of our proposed plat, as it clearly relates only to property to be used for church purposes--not for residential uses that may be constructed subsequent to the location of a church in a neighborhood. At the continuation of the public hearing on April 10, we specifically asked the Hearing Examiner to seek an interpretation from the City Attorney's Office. In his Report and Recommendation to the City Council dated April 13, he concluded that a legal opinion was not necessary. NEED COPIES TO: v SENT CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE RECORD CHRONICLE (PRESS) MAYOR'S OFFICE 7 _ CITY COUNCILd/i,,,d, FIN 4„.2 �� FINANCE DEPARTMENT e� � HEARING EXAMINER 3PLANNING DEPARTMENT ti ,PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR x PARK DEPARTMENTT/,h lcA4 PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT � c� — �CJoo.� ire;¢cc� 5 ty 6 X 11/� iJ 4._ i Mrs. Delores Mead Page 2 April 20, 1979 We strongly disagree with the Hearing Examiner's conclusion on this item of his recommendation and request the Council's reconsideration of this matter. Sincerely, BELIERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ( ; i. /ed. for Del 1 ett, Presi en I AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 13th day of April , 19 79 , affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. LG% A Subscribed and sworn this jF--day of a/4L 19 77 e2 r Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at ?eiton :. Application, Petition or Case: Belterra Development Corp. , PP-316-79 (The minutes contain a £Lst the panties os necond) • April 13, 1979 OFFICE OF THE . LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: . Belterra Development Corporation FILE NO. PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, *W-319-79, revised to E-319-79 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Pierce Avenue N.E. and N.E. 12th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks preliminary plat approval of an 11-lot single family subdivision. In addition, there are requests for an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance concerning pipestem lot, cul-de-sac length and deletion of turnaround, and a waiver of off-site improvements. • SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval subject to conditions RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: . Approval subject to conditions PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Examiner on March 23, 1979. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on _file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on March 27, 1979 at 10:25 a.m: in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. • ' Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. • • It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed ' the Planning Department report, and the report was entered into the record as Exhibit #1. David Clemens, Associate Planner, reviewed Exhibit #1, and entered the following additional exhibits into the record: Exhibit #2: Preliminary Plat as submitted ' • Exhibit #3: Preliminary' Plat with staff comments Exhibit #4: Letter to Planning Department from applicant, dated February 21, 1979, regarding requests for exceptions and waiver. Mr. Clemens corrected Section M.7 of Exhibit #1 (Departmental Recommendations) which stated: "Approval of the exception to the cul-de-sac length and provision of a minimum emergency vehicle turnaround for Queen Avenue N.E." to read: "Approval of the exception to the cul-de- sac length. Provision of a minimum emergency vehicle turnaround for Queen Avenue N.E. per Section L.5 of the .Departmental Analysis." Section L.5 reviews various aspects of the access proposal and recommends that the Hearing Examiner consider provision of a minimum turnaround for emergency vehicles at the south end of Queen Avenue N.E. The Examiner advised that the notice of public hearing contained in the application file does not include reference to applications for exceptions and waiver. Mr. Clemens confirmed that an error had occurred, thereby precluding discussion of the matters at the designated public hearing. The Examiner also noted that procedures for preliminary and final plat approval contained in Sections 9-1106.2 and 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance do not include provision for a waiver of off-site improvements; however, option for application for deferral for a period of two years is available to the applicant.. Following review of the ordinance, Mr. Clemens concurred with the Examiner's interpretation. In view of the substantial impact of this information, it was, agreed that the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat would proceed, and a subsequent public hearing would be scheduled for April 10, 1979, for the purpose of review of the requests for exception. The Examiner asked the applicant if she concurred in the proposal to reopen the public hearing at a later date. The applicant indicated concern that testimony may be repetitious, but concurred in the request. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry, other parties in attendance at the hearing also indicated concurrence. The Examiner advised that he would proceed with testimony regarding the preliminary plat and the subject of off-site improvements, noting a recent opinion from the City Attorney that requirement of off-site 1 [ PP-316-79 Page Two improvements must be justified on the basis, of public health, safety and welfare. The Examiner asked the applicant if she concurred in Exhibit #1. Responding was: Cheryl Henry Belterra Development Corporation P.O. Box 1282 Bellevue, WA 98009 Ms. Henry indicated general concurrence, but expressed concern regarding several recommendations contained in Exhibit #1. Referencing Section M.2 which recommends widening of corner Lot No. 4 to a width of 75 feet, she advised that the Subdivision Ordinance requires that corner lots be platted wider than interior lots; however, specific width area is not delineated within the ordinance. She advised that through a process of utilizing a tangent and arriving at a mean average, the width of Lot No. 4 had been established at 71.3 feet which meets ordinance requirements. Ms. Henry noted that square footage of 9,670 contained in the lot far exceeds minimum zoning requirement of 7200 square feet, and immovable constraints of property lines created by existence of property not owned by the applicant on the northern and southern boundaries of the site preclude : widening the lots. She advised that a drafting error had been discovered on the plat and lot depths of Lots 1, 2 and 3 as well as a portion of Lot No. 4 located between Pierce Avenue N.E. and Queen Avenue N.E. total 114 feet rather than 104 feet as indicated on the plat. Mr. Clemens designated the location of the subject lots on Exhibit #3 and confirmed the existence of a drafting error. Ms. Henry indicated that necessary front, rear and sideyard setbacks had been provided in conformance with ordinance requirements, and the imposition of five additional feet on the sideyard of Lot No. 4 would not substantially benefit the lot. She also noted that the lot width requirement for a corner lot under King County regulations is 70 feet. Referencing Section M.3 of Exhibit #1, which recommends provision of a 15-foot utility easement and storm drainage provisions across Lot No. 4 from Queen Avenue N.E. to N.E. 10th Court, Ms. Henry objected to the recommendation due to the current necessity to extend utility lines an excessive distance to connect to existing lines, and because of potential disruption and detriment to Lot No. 4. She also felt that if other properties are served by the proposed utilities, the cost of installation should be shared by all property owners on a fair-share basis. Referencing Section M.1 which recommends improvement of Pierce Avenue N.E. to the north line of Lot A, owned by Mr. Ray Ball, Ms. Henry advised that because purchase and development of the Ball property by the applicant is not intended, the requirement should be modified to extend the improvements to a midway point further south, possibly adjacent to N.E. llth Place. The Examiner requested comments in support of the request. There was no response. He then requested tesitmony in opposition to the application. Responding was: Norman Abrahamson 3408 N.E. 17th Street Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Abrahamson, owner of property at 1110 Queen Avenue N.E., responding to the intention of the applicant to develop Pierce Avenue N.E. and front proposed residences towards that street, objected to relegation of Queen Avenue N.E. , containing five homes and a vacant lot, to function as an alley, since it had originally been designated as a full public street in city development plans. He also objected to application by the developer for a number of exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance, and felt that elimination of exceptions could occur through development of Queen Avenue N.E. which would also benefit future development of the area. Mr. Abrahamson supported provision of a utility easement across Lot No. 4 as well as provision of storm drainage facilities to alleviate existing drainage problems in the vicinity of Queen Avenue N.E. Responding was: Charles Shoaf 1108 Queen Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Shoaf concurred in testimony provided by Mr. Abrahamson. He reiterated comments relating to original city plans for development of Queen Avenue N.E. into a full city street, and requested mitigation of existing drainage problems on Queen Avenue N.E. Responding was: Stan Eorickson 1111 Pierce Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 PP-316-79 Page Three Mr. Eorickson supported improvement of Pierce Avenue N.E. to the northern boundary of Lot A per the Planning Department recommendation to provide traffic safety adjacent to N.E. llth Place. He inquired regarding limitation of access on Pierce Avenue N.E. during construction activity, extent of improvements on that roadway, and extent of impact to existing residents by increased traffic. The Examiner indicated that access may be temporarily limited during construction activity and off-site improvements, if required, must be justified by reason of public health, safety and welfare. Mr. Eorickson advised that the existing condition of Pierce Avenue N.E. is substandard and would require substantial improvement to bear increased traffic. Responding was: Larry Kaastad 1115 Pierce Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Kaastad supported provision of full off-site improvements on Pierce Avenue N.E. to a point beyond N.E. llth Place to preclude creation of a bottle-neck and provide safety for parked vehicles as well as emergency vehicles. Responding was: Emma Tucker 1206 Thomas Lane Thunder Hill Apartments, #252 Renton, WA 98055 Ms. Tucker, purchaser of property at 1108 Queen Avenue IQ.E. , inquired regarding the extent of pavement on the proposed pipestem Lot No. 5, and if drainage problems would occur adjacent to her property as a result of paving. The Examiner advised that a certain amount of run-off would occur adjacent to the paved area, but approval of the building permit which is required prior to development of Lot No. 5 would address the specific storm drainage details. Ms. Tucker inquired regarding location of the proposed sewer line on the pipestem road. Utilizing Exhibit #3, Mr. Clemens designated proposed location of sanitary sewer and storm drainage lines, which will extend around the perimeter of Lots No. 5 and 6 southerly to N.E. 10th Court and connect to Redmond Avenue N.E. Ms. Tucker also indicated her concern regarding disposition of Queen Avenue N.E. as an alley. Mr. Abrahamson requested explanation of the rationale for the decision to extend utility lines south to N.E. 10th Court rather than northerly to N.E. 12th Street, noting his opinion that it would be more beneficial to provide utility lines in proximity to existing residences to enable future connection. The Examiner requested testimony from a representative of the Public Works Department. Responding was: Don Monaghan Public Works Department Mr. Monaghan was affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner reiterated Mr. Abrahamson's inquiry regarding utility line extension to the south rather than in a northerly direction to N.E. 12th Street. Mr. Monaghan responded that the choice of directional route would lead him to believe that contours of the land and higher elevation of N.E. 12th Street had effected the final determination of utility line extension to the south. Mr. Abrahamson inquired if Mr. Monaghan's comments were fact or conjecture. Mr. Monaghan advised that review of the plans would be necessary to verify information regarding elevations contained within the site. Following review of the submitted plans, Mr. Clemens indicated that contours shown on the plat designate a five-foot increase in elevation on N.E. 12th Street from the proposed cul-de-sac. Mr. Monaghan advised that due to ground elevations and because lines must be placed as shallow as possible, the connection to existing lines on N.E. 10th Court was. determined most feasible. He also noted that directing lines to a higher elevation such as exists on N.E. 12th Street would necessitate provision of a pumping facility which is not economically feasible for the subject proposal and discouraged by the city due to continual maintenance problems. Mr. Monaghan indicated that it is the option of the developer to determine utility line location and in this case the route had been chosen because there had been no other alternative available. The Examiner requested comments from Mr. Monaghan regarding requirements for off-site improvements for the subdivision in the interest of public health, safety and welfare. Mr. Monaghan indicated that improvements along Pierce Avenue N.E. would be required to the south line of the unincorporated parcel adjacent to Lot A to expedite traffic movement,. but improvements to other access streets bordering the subject site had been referred to the Examiner without comment. The Examiner indicated that he would require testimony to enable him to provide a recommendation on the matter. Mr. Monaghan stated that if improvements are determined to be required on N.E. 12th Street, Queen Avenue N.E. and N.E. 10th Court, they would consist of installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving and lighting; however., he preferred not to comment on the necessity for'such improvements. The Examiner requested clarification regarding whether Mr. Monaghan preferred not to comment PP-316-79 Page Four or required additional time to submit a recommendation in writing. Mr. Monaghan indicated his preference to submit the departmental recommendation in writing. Mr. Abrahamson felt that previous testimony relating to location of utility lines consisted of conjecture, and requested further research to determine the feasibility of extension of lines to N.E. 12th Street. He also requested further information regarding provision of storm drainage facilities. The Examiner advised that approval of the preliminary plat requires submittal of plans for underground sanitary and storm sewer lines as well as details for connection to utility, systems. Mr. Clemens indicated that the information provided within the drawings submitted by the applicant sufficiently meets ordinance requirements. The Examiner requested further testimony from the applicant. Ms. Henry advised that to her knowledge, determination of utility line connection had occurred as contained in submitted plans due to existing elevations within the plat and the city's policy regarding installation of lift stations. She also concurred with Mr. Monaghan's statement that the property owner has the option of determining the direction of the sewer lines. Ms. Henry requested that. representatives from the city's Engineering Division and Traffic Engineering Division be in attendance at the continued public hearing to further clarify the question of installation of utility lines to serve the proposed plat, requirement of off-site improvements, and extent of turnaround area at the end of Queen Avenue N.E. The Examiner inquired if utility plans are normally reviewed in detail upon submittal of the final plat. Mr. Clemens advised that plans submitted with the preliminary plat request are intended to be sufficient to determine if the site can be adequately served by existing utilities in the vicinity, and precise details would follow the preliminary plat. He noted that upon submittal of final engineering drawings, these details will be reviewed. The Examiner requested a representative from the Parks and Recreation Department to testify regarding the intent of Section L.10 of Exhibit #1, which states that recreational space should be acquired prior to final approval of the plat. Responding was: John Webley Parks & Recreation Director Mr. Webley was affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner requested clarification of the requirement for provision of recreational area in the vicinity prior to approval of the plat. Mr. Webley advised that the subject site is located within Neighborhood No. 10, Sierra Heights and Heather Downs area, as designated in the Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, adopted in March of 1978. He indicated that although the subject development does not constitute a major impact to existing parks in the general vicinity, expanding growth in the surrounding area has required acquisition of a 12-acre recreational site to accommodate the increased demand. The Examiner noted that acquisition of a 12-acre site is along-term goal, and inquired if delaying approval of the subject development was the intent of the recommendation. Mr. Webley indicated that since the acquisition is considered of low priority, it was not the intent to delay approval. The Examiner requested testimony from a representative of the Utilities Division to respond to previous inquiries regarding location of utility lines. Responding was: Ron Olson Utilities Division Public Works Department Mr. Olson was affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner reiterated previous inquiries regarding the rationale utilized to determine connection of utility lines to N.E. 10th Court and whether it is feasible to direct utility lines to N.E. 12th Street as an alternative. Mr. Olson advised that the existing sanitary sewer in the intersection of Pierce Avenue N.E. and N.E. 12th Street extends down Pierce Avenue N.E. to N.E. llth Street. He noted that due to the elevation differences, he would assume that connection was found necessary to the south to eliminate the necessity of a pumping station. The Examiner inquired if a sewer line extends east of Pierce Avenue N.E. along N.E. 12th Street. Mr. Olson advised that a sewer line does not exist in N.E. 12th Street. The Examiner inquired if finish elevations of the roadway and location of utility lines into the plat would be required in order to provide more definitive testimony. Mr. Olson indicated that actual elevations had not been investigated, but he would assume that the engineer for the project would have preferred installation of 100 feet of sewer line to the north rather than the proposed 400 feet to the south if the possibility had existed. Mr. Abrahamson objected to Mr. Olson's use of the word "assume," and requested that additional technical investigation be accomplished prior to finalizing the utility plans in order to provide the most feasible plan for future development in the area, Queen Avenue N.E. in particular. • PP-316-79 Page Five The Examiner requested further comments: Responding was: Florence Shoaf 1108 Queen Avenue N.E. Renton, WA 98055 Mrs. Shoaf emphasized that residents of Queen 'Avenue N.E. will be greatly impacted by the proposed development through final determination of location of sanitary and storm sewer lines, as well as development of access roads. She indicated that Queen Avenue N.E. is designated as a 50-foot right-of-way of which only 20 feet has been developed, and request the Examiner's consideration of total impact of development upon existing residents. The Examiner advised that the subject. of off-site improvements will remain open for discussion at the continued hearing as well as the subjects of exception from the Subdivision Ordinance. He indicated that information regarding these subjects would be obtained from the Public Works Department prior to the meeting, and inquired if parties in attendance objected to this procedure. There was no objection. • The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing regarding File No. PP-316-79 was closed at 12:15 p.m. and continued to April 10, 1979. CONTINUANCE: • The hearing was opened on April 10, 1979 at 9:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner'. The Examiner advised receipt of a letter which was read into the record and entered as follows: Exhibit #5: Letter to Hearing Examiner from Norman Abrahamson, dated March 30, 1979. Exhibit #5 reviewed Mr. Abrahamson's requests of the proposed development,, which included provision of storm.sewer drainage and utilities easement between the south end of Queen Avenue N.E. and proposed N.E. llth Court; provision of restrictive covenants to limit access. from Queen Avenue N.E. to the four lots abutting Queen; and provision of restrictiv4 covenants requiring owners of lots abutting Queen to participate in an LID at a future dab if proposed. The letter also stated that Mr. Abrahamson's objections will be withdrawn if the aforestated conditions are met. • The Examiner also entered the following additional documents into the record: Exhibit #6: Restrictive Covenants required by rezone of subject property; File No. R-270-78. • Exhibit #7: Restrictive Covenants required by rezone of northern portion of the property owned by Margaret and Ray Ball; File No. R-083-77. Mr. Clemens advised receipt of a memorandum from the Public Works Director which was enter( as follows: Exhibit #8: Memorandum to Hearing Examiner from • Warren C. Gonnason; dated April 10, 1979. Exhibit #8 responded to previous inquiries regarding requirement of off-site improvements as part of proposed development, and stated the department has no objection to approval of a' waiver on Queen,Avenue N.E. since public health, safety and welfare would not be adverse. affected. Regarding a waiver of.off-site improvements on N.E. 10th Court and N.E. 12th Street, because properties fronting on these roadways are not proposed to be developed as part of the plat, the department would have no objection to granting of a waiver subject to execution of restrictive covenants agreeing to participate in a future LID. The memorandum advised that improvement' of Pierce Avenue N.E. north of Lot No. 1 should be sufficient to provide for a complete intersection at this point, subject to approval of the Public Works Department. Responding to the Examiner's request, Mr. Clemens designated on Exhibit #3 the specific location of the proposed improvements on Pierce Avenue N.E. He noted that the intersection at N.E. llth Place and Pierce Avenue N.E. should be completed with full width pavement to provide safe traffic movement in the area. The Examiner stated that•the Subject of utility line extension would require clarification as a result of discussion at the previous hearing, and requested a representative of the Public Works Department. to testify. Responding was: Paul Lumbert • Traffic Engineering Division PP-316-79 Page Six r. Lumbert was affirmed by the Examiner. The Examiner referenced comments contained in xhibit #8 regarding requirement for improvement of Pierce Avenue N.E. north of Lot No. 1 and requested clarification of the request. Mr. Lumbert indicated that curbs and gutters ould be provided along Pierce Avenue N.E. to the north side of the proposed intersection of N.E. llth Place and Pierce to expedite safe traffic flow through the intersection and •rotect pedestrian safety beyond the proposed curb and gutter section. The Examiner asked Mr. Clemens to review requirements for off-site improvements along Pierce Avenue N.E. Mr. Clemens indicated that from Lot No. 1 westerly to N.E. llth Court, on-site improvements consisting of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and paving should continue northward to the southwest corner of Tax Lot 205. Mr. Lumbert clarified that a tapered section would be installed in the section of roadway abutting Lot A to provide a transition to current alignment and preclude access in the privately owned property contained in Tax Lot 205. The Examiner requested testimony from the applicant. Responding was: Del Bennett Belterra Development Corp. P.O. Box 1282 Bellevue, WA 98009 Mr. Bennett was affirmed by the Examiner. Regarding transition of roadway section to the existing pavement, Mr. Bennett objected to staff recommendations for tapering to the northern boundary of 'Lot A as being inconsistent with recommendation contained within Exhibit #8 from the Public Works Director. He advised current city requirements for provision of full improvements to right-of-way abutting the development including curb, gutter; sidewalk, paving, underground wiring and full utilities, and noted his intent to provide a transition from the northern boundary Of Lot 1 to the proposed intersection of N.E. llth Place and 'Pierce Avenue N.E. back to the existing pavement width of Pierce, although he felt provision of full off-site improvements in the transition area would not benefit the public. He also advised that improvements to the section abutting Lot A would require approval of the property owner, Mr. Ray Ball. Responding to the Examiner's inquiry regarding concerns expressed in Mr. Abrahamson's letter, Exhibit #5, Mr. Bennett indicated his intent to mitigate current drainage problems existing at the southern portion of Queen Avenue N.E. by extension of storm sewer system along proposed lot lines. Regarding ,proposed restrictive covenants requiring property owners abutting Queen Avenue N.E. to participate in an LID at'a future date, Mr. Bennett indicated that he had suggested to Mr. Abrahamson that current requirements included in an LID may be in excess of the desired standard of improvement, and minimum provision of paving at a future date may satisfactorily. improve existing substandard conditions. The Examiner referenced previous discussion relating to extension of sewer lines to N.E. 12th Street in lieu of 'proposed extension to N.E. 10th Court. Mr. Bennett indicated that various alternatives for extension were reviewed, but due to topography and required depth for installation of the .line, the proposed location had been finally determined. The Examiner inquired if a pumping facility would be required to extend lines to N.E: 12th Street. Mr. Bennett responded affirmatively. Mr. Bennett advised that although application for a variance through the Board of Adjustment had occurred to reduce the required setback of 100 feet from the church property located south of the site, he requested that a legal opinion be obtained to clarify the purpose of the.requirement which he felt was imposed to protect existing single family neighborhoods from intrusion by church construction, and not to protect church property from single family home construction. • The Examiner requested comments from the applicant regarding the request for exception to delete requirement for turnaround area. Mr. Bennett indicated that although the application for exception had been made, it was his opinion that it was not necessary due to his intent to preclude access onto Queen Avenue N.E. in the form of restrictive covenants included on the face.of the plat. He also advised his opinion that responsibility for provision Of turnaround area should be shared by those property owners who utilize Queen Avenue N.E. for access. The 'Examiner inquired if staff. has evaluated compliance of proposed Lot 6 with dimension requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance'. Mr. Clemens responded affirmatively. The Examiner referenced Section L'.10 of Exhibit #1 regarding critical. need for recreational space in the general neighborhood, and requested clarification of the recommendation as it relates 'to the proposal. ' Mr. Clemens reiterated previous testimony by Mr. Webley, Parks and Recreation Director; noting that a requirement for open space as part of the plat approval had not been included in the Planning Department recommendation. The Examiner requested a final recommendation from the Planning Department representative. . Mr. Clemens indicated that the recommendation would remain as submitted with the exception ' • of 'correction to Section M.7 of Exhibit #1, previously stated during the initial hearing. PP-316-79 Page Seven The Examiner requested further comments. Mrs. Emma Tucker inquired regarding procedures for connection to proposed sewer lines. The Examiner advised that the developer should b contacted regarding connection procedures. Mr. Bennett indicated willingness to coordina the matter with existing residents on Queen Avenue N.E. , noting that the cost would be borne by property owners benefiting from the extension. Mrs. Florence Shoaf indicated concern regarding provision of a turnaround area at the end of Queen Avenue N.E. , and inquired if sufficient dedicated property was available for tha purpose. Mr. Lumbert indicated that 15 feet on either side of the roadway would be requi for turnaround area, and depending upon the configuration of the roadway, the dedicated 50-foot width could possibly accommodate the proposed turnaround. Mr. Bennett indicated that it would be logical for those residents who utilize Queen Avenue N.E. to provide additional access and beat the cost of the improvement in conjunction with utility line extension if desired. Mr. Charles Shoaf stated that provision of additional access may be acquired from a property owner located at the end of Queen Avenue N.E. to provide sufficient turnaround for the cul-de-sac. The Examiner requested that the matter be resolved separately from the subject application. The Examiner requested further comments. Since there were none, the hearing on File No. PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79 was closed by the Examiner at 9:52 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: ' 1. The request is for approval of an 11-lot single family preliminary plat of Brentwood Park Addition, together with exceptions from the Subdivision Ordinance for one pipeste lot, 560-foot cul-de-sac, deletion'of cul-de-sac turnaround, and deletion of off-site improvements. 2. The Planning Department report accurately sets forth the issues, applicable policies and provisions, findings of fact, and departmental recommendations in this matter, and is hereby attached as Exhibit #1 and incorporated in this report by reference as set forth in full therein. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended by R.C.W. 43.21.C. , a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by Gordon Y. Ericksen, responsible official (Exhibit #1) . 4. Plans for the proposal. have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity; except for a required sanitary sewer extension. 6. The proposal is compatible with the lot area and dimension requirements of Sections 4-706 (R-1) and 4-729 (G) of Title IV, and Section 9-1108.23 (Minimum Standards for Residential Design-Subdivision Ordinance) , Title IX, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances; except for: a. Pipestem Lot 5 (Section 9-1108.23.F. (3) . (d) .) . b. Queen Avenue N.E. cul-de-sac of 560 feet instead of the 500-foot maximum of Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) . c. Deletion of cul-de-sac turnaround at the end of Queen Avenue N.E. which is required by Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) . d. Deletion of off-site improvements along N.E. 12th Street, Queen Avenue N.E. , along Pierce Avenue N.E. north of N.E. llth Place, and along N.E. 10th Court. e. Setback of the proposal of 25 feet from the abutting church buildings instead of the required 100-foot setback per Sections 4-729 and 4-706. (3) . (a) .3. f. Lot 4 is not platted wider than interior lots per Section 9-1108.23.F. (4) . 7. A variance from the setback requirement of Section 4-706. (3) . (a) .3 has been requested by the applicant of the Board of Adjustment. A decision will be made by the board after conclusion of this public hearing. PP-316-79 Page Eight 8. Restrictive covenants exist on the northerly approximate 300 feet of the property as a result of reclassifying the property to R-1 (R-083-77) which attest to participation in an LID, for required off-site improvements such as curbs, gutters; sidewalks, street paving, undergrounding of utilities, and street lighting. The southerly approximate 270 feet of the R-1 zoned portion of .the.property was recently rezoned to R-1 (R-270-78) and covenants completed 'requiring: a. Subdivision of the total property owned by the United Presbyterian Church. b. "Dedication of the easterly 20 feet of Pierce Avenue N.E. for public•right-of-way and agreement to participate in an LID for construction of th'e required off-site improvements is required at such time as development of the eastern 20 feet of Pierce Avenue N.E. between N.E. llth Street and N.E. Street is possible and required by the City of Renton. • 9. The applicant testified that restrictive covenants for the proposal would contain restrictions prohibiting access from the proposal to Queen Avenue N.E. 0. The Public .Works Department. staff stated that sufficient area apparently exists in the right-of-way of Queen Avenue N.E. to develop an adequate turnaround. 11. An exception (originally requested as a waiver) was requested by the appl,icant 'of the requirement of off-site improvements along Queen Avenue N.E. Improvements ,are proposed along Pierce Avenue N.E. abutting Lots l. through 4 but not on the remaining northerly portion of this street (Exhibit #3) . Also abutting the proposal is N.E. 12th Street and N.E. 10th Court, for which off-site improvements, in addition to Queen Avenue N.E. , were not, proposed or recommended by staff. . • Regarding., off-site improvements north of Lot 1 along Pierce Avenue N.E. , disagreement exists between the applicant and staff on how to appropriately reduce from a two-lane to a single-lane configuration in this street (Exhibit #3) . Staff recommended tapering from a point parallel to the northerly right-of-way line of N.E.. llth Place meeting the easterly right-of-way of Pierce Avenue N.E. to the southwest corner of the abutting Tax Lot 205. , The applicant offered the alternative of beginning the taper at a more southerly point, that of the northwest corner of proposed Lot 1. • 12. Storm drainage plans were not submitted. CONCLUSIONS: • 1. The proposal conforms to the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and appears to serve the public. interest, health, safety and welfare (Section 9-1106.2.E. (2) ) . This proposal is slightly unusual in that ,it combines two separate ownerships with a plat between two, of another ownership and .leaves the two same ownerships at opposite ends of the.plat.. . Some of the conflicts with the zoning regulations and Subdivision Ordinance are a result of this situation. • 2. The pipestem. configuration of Lot 5 appears appropriate under the circumstances of the difficult "L-shaped" configuration of the southeastern corner of the property (Section 9-1109.1.A) . Strict conformance with the Subdivision Ordinance would necessitate deletion of Lot 5 of provision of dedicated public access, both of which appear to substantially reduce the reasonable use of the property (Section 9-1109.1.A) . Under similar circumstances other properties in the area would be entitled to the same application for an exception, and the pipestem is a commonly used design for solving difficult problems of property configurations (Section 9-1109.1.B) . Detriment to the public or other properties is not apparent (Section 9-1109.1.C) .' 3. Based upon the statement of the applicant'that restrictions upon the plat would prohibit access from the proposal onto Queen Avenue N.E. , it has not been shown that the proposal will impact this road sufficiently to burden the applicant with off-site improvements. Benefit to the public and interest of the public health, safety and welfare can be shown for some improvements in this street in view of the substandard • condition that exists. However, it has not- been clearly demonstrated that these improvements are necessary and what specific improvements.should be required. 4. Relative to the length of Queen Avenue N.E. (beyond the 500 foot minimum of Section 9-1108.23:A. (.7) ) the 'applicant is not affecting the existing length. This nonconforming situation can continue to exist under the established doctrine and land use principle of nonconforming uses. 'An exception does not appear to .be required. • 5. Since Queen Avenue N.E:. is an 'existing street that will be unaffected by the proposal (access prohibited from the plat) an exception does not appear.required for the turnaround.. requirement of Section 9-1108.23.A. (7) .' . A turnaround does not currently .exist, therefore, a nonconforming situation is permitted' to continue until directly . affected or altered by subsequent development. • PP-316-79 Page Nine 6. Off-site improvements along N.E. 12th Street and N.E. 10th Court were not sufficient) defined or justified to be required. However, sufficient doubt exists, due to .existi' traffic along these streets, to preclude, a clear conclusion that a waiver should be granted. It appears appropriate under these circumstances to allow the normal LID process to run its course for any improvements along this street. The owners of Lot have apparently already agreed to participate in this LID (Exhibit #7) . 7. Off-site improvements along Pierce Avenue N.E. abutting the proposal appear necessary for safe and adequate traffic and pedestrian safety. Abutting Lots A and 1 through 4 should be constructed improvements of curb, gutter, paving, sidewalk and street lighting. Some form of transition between these improvements and existing improvement should occur in the to-be-dedicated right-of-way abutting Lot A. Lacking specific design details, .it seems reasonable and logical for the Public Works Department staff to design this transition to enhance the public health, safety, welfare and general aesthetics. , These improvements conform to Exhibits #6 and 7. 8. Relative to the existing church buildings on Lot B, Section 4-706. (3) . (a) .3 specifical requires a 100-foot setback from any residentially zoned lot. Between Lot 8 and the nearest church building must exist 100 feet. Prior to, the proposal compliance with 'this requirement existed. Only as a result of the proposal is the nonconformity produced. It is a.fundamental land use principle and doctrine that new development cannot increase the nonconformity or create nonconformity of an existing conforming situation. Since the proposal, by design, is creating a' conflict with zoning 'requirements the design must be revised (or varied by the Board of Adjustment) to conform.. Due. to this very fundamental principle and doctrine, it does not appear that a legal opinion of the City Attorney is necessary for confirmation. 9. ' Since Lot 4 does.not meet the minimum width requirements of Section 9-1108.23.F. (4) additional width must be added to secure compliance. An exception was not requested from this requirement. 10. The utilities serving the proposal have been designed reasonably and in response to existing conditions. In response to Exhibit #5 the applicant agreed to provide a storm sewer and utilities easement from the south end of Queen Avenue N.E. to the proposed N.E. llth Court. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Exhibit #2 subject to: • 1. Revision of the southerly property line to be 100 feet from adjacent church buildings, 'or approval Of a variance therefrom by the Board of Adjustment. 2. Placement of a restriction on the plat and in restrictive covenants, if needed, prohibiting access of any lot to Queen Avenue N.E. 3. Installation of off-site improvements along Pierce Avenue N.E. from Lot 4 to Lot A, tapering to existing improvements, per review and approval of the Public Works Department according to Conclusion No. 8. 4. Widening of Lot 4 to conform to Section 9-1108.23.F. (4) per review and approval of the Planning Department. 5. Submittal of storm drainage plans for review and approval of the Public Works Department prior to submittal of the final plat. 6. Compliance with all other applicable ordinances and regulations of the City of Renton. Approval of the exception to permit pipestem Lot 5. ORDERED THIS 13th day of April, 1979. PPIA L. R Beeler . Land Use Hearing Examiner PP-316-79 Page Ten TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of April, 1979 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Del Bennett, Belterra Development Corp. , P.O. Box 1282, Bellevue, WA 98009 Cheryl Henry, Belterra Development Corp. , P.O. Box 1282, Bellevue, WA 98009 Norman Abrahamson, 3408' N.E. 17th'St. , Renton, WA 98055 Charles & Florence Shoaf, 1108 Queen Ave. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Stan Eorickson, 1111 Pierce Ave.. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Larry Kaastad, 1115 Pierce Ave. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 Emma Tucker, 1206 Thomas Lane, Thunder Hill Apts. , #252, Renton, WA 98055 William A. Jackson, 3508 N.E. llth Place, Renton, WA 98055 Dan Nomura, 3188 Sunset Blvd. N.E. , Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED THIS 13th day of April, 1979 to the following: Mayor Charles J. Delaurenti Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Ron Nelson, Building Division Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Don Monaghan, Public Works Department Ron Olson, Utilities Division Paul Lumbert, Traffic Engineering Division John Webley, Parks & Recreation Director Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before April 27, 1979. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error ' in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proper. An appeal, to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other speficied requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall, or same may be purchased at cost in said department. 3 .i r-fig,,.14 fN . sr . 6.S , ici �' _--�.0 A 0 4trziao a . 0 o DII ir) nu 0 i D. . [ ti$1,..,,,e ] q0. 0 ‘‘ \ 01tit0 0 0 gem,vAt \ us a 0 Pi° fi� El eta_® ' r1 J 4] [30. ifEl niJ ® ClMIf$ 0 t s EP CI la 01 HIE Efl 0 k . \ 0 1? D 0p , 0 ► 0 : a 0—3 r7 S'1 0 ® ' `" L° l.y C C1 (� ti ins° ' Ell ' o • .3 r-Z) I:;] C:I G3 W 4 h- tt 0\ t V 0 0 ' tt .4„; \ c R4 11 rd . 010 El 1 tato -.3 V2..fl. F3 0 to f W -� I k. E3 0 \ CI C=1 Cr' t 0 0 �a ' 0 iv. am4 s►" • ue . Nie it 0 tr 1=3 C=3 cl E3 kl (33 Z-.1 sc23 ED .4, 0 3 c& 2,0G . , N8 ro r'l PL a 1ril Oa ®oris cr D 0 El ED II D 1:3 b ea itilloVIM CI r''---" ' 0:\ 1 CO 2 ® 0 6'45 1 ; ® c� �] �l 0 C3 0 Na 4 mo . 0 0 1 r y `. 0 ( rm 01,0•11woot9 fa 4pj1iOt'J i. 1 '' \. I �\ ,,tip • I. � t :411 I � u 1 , fil 4 Fes., .S•� • .11 • 1 ., • . 1) . 1 . II . . .1}jacr \ ( . • , •: ' 4.........Clid1.7..11 1102 � .OII .K•i •507. " I r • ':/'' 1111 1 I r T I. I: ‘.....11 1 l'‘. *t. ' 6 i\ it �•. - _J, • ' , • U uu 1 !'M 1 v n 1�4C WU�N .'.1 'e 1.12':"Nt.,.. ,„ • ...:it� ' o ; 4.' • "trit \ -1 , 1 ; •\ ,ii I 1 , eI , "+ .,, .1 • • I 1 � 1 } (4 ' M' • • I 1 & ` 1.\ 2 • 3 1"7 bI i _ 11 . ',� . 1 `• • _. II I • VI. . '� e� 1 ;,see s ‘ . 1,4.7 ; ;Tay ; • ti 1Q. ry '• ' I `�11 ...,i;i II� :-• �v jai • i n • i , Y%' ) 1� Fl W• CCCCCC �\ 1 ,).-1I 1 1 - j I r •!Y.,:eF • 14, E 1 Li! 1 . 1• 1.4, I , i...... , I�n I t j:i' -- ..7'+dN�R.Zu.0 Et,.;'' - • -.__• -(,F 7dl._b'_S-.•,lar./ 1 '+ I pLi 7 w"/ IN be, 4464 • Q- /7/9/V1/, y BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ��F1'AR���i 12843 N.E. 14th PL., BELLEVUE, WA 98005 Y. phone 206-454-0539 February 21, 1979 Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Plat of Brentwood Park Addition/Request for Exception Dear Mr. Ericksen: Pursuant to Section 9-1109 of the Renton Subdivision Ordinance, this will constitute our request for exceptions relating to the proposed Preliminary Plat of Brentwood Park Addition, located between Queen Avenue NE and Pierce Avenue NE in the vicinity of NE llth Street: Pipestem Configuration for Lots '5 and 6. We are requesting approval of a pipestem configuration for Lots 5 and 6. Our design meets the terms of Section 9-1108 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance which outlines the conditions under which the Hearing Examiner may approve pipestem lots. 3�74 Specifically, the subject lots contain the required area for the zoning !1 ! r classification exclusive of the area of the pipestem; the pipestem is less than 150 feet in length; and it is 20 feet in width. We understand---. . that a minimum 10-foot wide driveway of permanent paving is required the length of the pipestem together with landscaping in the area which is not paved. We ask that the pipestem be conditionally approved so that the required landscaping may be installed when homes are constructed on the pipestem lots. Cul-de-sac Length and Cul-de-sac Turnaround on Queen Avenue NE and Waiver of Off-site Improvements on Queen Avenue NE. It was suggested to us by City staff that we request an exception for cul-de-sac length and cul-de-sac turnaround for Queen Avenue NE in view of the fact that our plat design in does not provide for the connection of Queen to either NE llth Street or any other street. We address this subject only at the staff's suggestion, as our proposal will in no way change the existing Queen Avenue NE. At the same time we request a waiver of off-site improvements on Queen Avenue NE. — RECEIVED T CITY OF RENTON i a _ 1 HEARING EXAMINER MAR 2 71979 ITEM NO. 7, AM PM 71819ol0,11a1211 s2o3a4l5o6 a Mr. Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Page 2 February 21, 1979 In his Report and Recommendation to the City Council dated October 21, 1977, pertaining to the rezone of the Ball property, the Hearing Examiner concluded that any access to Queen Avenue NE should be discouraged due to the narrow width of the street, which for all practical purposes serves as an alley and access for only a few homes. Queen Avenue NE extends southerly 550 feet from NE 12th Street, and a good portion of that right- of-way is only 30 feet wide. Approximately 220 feet abut the proposed Brentwood Park Addition. . Accordingly, our plat design does not provide for any access from Queen Avenue NE. The lots have been designed to front on Pierce Avenue NE and the cul-de-sac which will be extended into the plat in the vicinity of NE 11th Street. Therefore, we contend that our proposed development will in no way change the existing Queen Avenue NE or interfere with the present access to the few homes served by this alley. With the present configuration, off-site improvements on Queen Avenue NE would provide no benefits whatsoever to Brentwood Park Addition. In fact, the improvement of Queen Avenue NE would create an undesirable and detrimental "frontdoor/backdoor" access situation for the lots in Brentwood Park Addition. In conclusion, we believe that the granting of the above exceptions will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity, and are necessary to insure our property the rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the neighborhood and under similar circumstances. The configuration of the property is such that the strict application of the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance would prevent the reasonable use and development of the property. Sincerely, /-BEIL-'rERRA DEVE OPMENT CORPORATION A/ Sheryl Hen - 717/1--- Vice Presaderit -� -Administration I • March 30, 1979 To: Hearing Examiner (R. Beeler) Regarding the proposed development from Belterra Development Corp. , (file #PP-316-79, E-317-79, E-318-79, W-319-79, Brentwood Park Add) as it affects the future of Queen street. Due to the shallow depth of the property, there is no obvious way that Pierce and Queen can bathe "front" for the houses located between. Mr. Bennett, the developer, proposed some-things at a meeting with me on 3/28/79, which I feel would minimize adverse effects to Queen street should you decide to approve the plat as proposed. These are the things which I feel should be required: a) Storm sewer drainage and utilities easement between the south end of Queen street and proposed N.E. llth Court. b) Restrictive covenant to limit access from Queen street to the four lots which abut Queen street. c) Restrictive covenant requiring owners of the lots which abut Queen street to participate in an LID if and when one is proposed. If these conditions are met, I will withdraw my objections. RECEIVED 91/709/4e,-,/e. dditodP-Aer CITY OF RENTON Norman Abrahamson HEARING EXAMINER 3408 N. E. 17th Street n rI, 1 01979 Renton, Washington AM PM ft EXHIBIT 1�O 5 • 1REC li/ D ITEM NO. /9,-/6- 79 CITY OF RENTO HEARING EXAMINER APR 21979 AM Purl 71 g 19,10.11112.l 1213l415.6 Planning Department • CB lterra::Co p rat1ori '� 't=21,0 ..84• ' RECEIVE CITY OF REP DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS HEARING EXAM • • • WHEREAS, James Vanderway, a single man, is the owner of the following real n PR 1 19a AM property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington; and Belterra 7i8t�,f0i11mlik` i Dikevelopment Corporation; Delbert C. "Bennett, President,_ has contracted to purchase the following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows: • That,portion of'the East of the East 5 of the Northwest Isof the Northeast 4 of Section '9, Township 23 No •rth, Range 5.East', W.M., in ▪ King County., Washington, lying northerly of N.$'. 10th Court, EXCEPT EXHIBIT I\O ▪ the North 700 feet'of the East 4 thereof and EXCEPT the North 591 feet of the West 12 thereof. EXCEPT an 18-foot strip adjoining Lot 8'ITEM Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2, Albert Balch's President Park No. 12. NO ��c EXCEPT that portion lying South of the Easterly extension of the North right-of-way line of N.E. 10th Place. WHEREAS, the owners and purchasers of said described property, hereinafter "the property," desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future; of the property; NOW THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners and purchasers hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors, heirs and assigns, as follows: • COMPLETION OF SUBDIVISION Approval of the rezone of the property is subject to completion of the appropriate subdivision of the total property owned by the United Presbyterian Church whereby the subject property is created. ROADWAY DEDICATION AND INSTALLATION OF OFF-SITE It3PROVEMENTS Dedication of the easterly 20 feet of Pierce Avenue N.E. for public right-of-Way and agreement to participate in an L.I.D. for construction of the required off-site improvements is required at such time as development of the eastern 20 feet of Pierce , Avenue N.E. between N.E. llth Street and N.E. 12th Street is possible and required by the City of Renton. DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2025. If at any time improvements are installed pursuant to these covenants, the portion of the covenants pertaining to the specific installed improvements as required by the . Ordinances of the City of Renton shall terminate without necessity for further documentation. Proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County may be instigated by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the parties whom the court determines are in error and shall be entered as a judgment in such action. ( ' ' 7 'dames 'Vanaerway, Owner • Be errs Develo pment C oration, by Delbert C. Bennett, President, Purchaser • • STATE OF WASHINGTON) • COUNTY OF KING On this „.2? day of ;.,�ti 19 j , before ma personally appeared James Vanderway, the person, and Delbert C. Bennett to be known to be the President of the Belterra Development Corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the voluntary act and deed of said person and corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath Mr. Bennett stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument for said corporation, and that the seal affixed, if any, is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. ,4�)Nota ublic in and fgith,7St�e of Washington, residing in,te,, J _�P�li,aC� • -2- --- a rAt-L:r-&=-Ray'_ i;-:-Ball-e75r, RECEIVED DECLARATION air eESTRICTIVE COVENANTS CITY OF RENT ON HEARING EXAMINER MESAS, Ray S. Sall, Sa. and hie wife Margaret L. Dall are the owners of the PM AM PR 1979 following real property in the City of Renton, County of King, state of Washington, 71S19110111,I211,213141516 described as follows: All that portion of Section 9, Townehip 2311, Range 5E, W.M. described ae follows; The North 591 foot of the Nest 1/2 of the Cant 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the E9srthwest 1/4 of the Corthacst 1/4 of paid Section 9. MMESEAS, the o nsrs of said described property, hereinafter 'the plrcporty,'ExHIB T 7 desire to impose the following restrictive covenant] running with the land as to • me, preccmt and future, of the property: ITEM /flvl NO.. /Z�G KOM , the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose 1 1` restrictions'and covenants running with the land an to use by the usedoroignod, their ssrccescars, heirs and assi.gass, as follows: INSTALLATION CI err-SITS navamenerrs The test 20 feet of the I?arth 210 feet off the property shall be dedicated to the City of Renton for the purpcee of public access upon demolition or removal of the existing building within the heroin described westerly 20 foot. The owners of the above described property, their successors, heirs and assigns, hereby agree and covet to participate in, sign a petition in support of, and accept any Local Improvement District (LID) or city initiated proposal, and pay their fair and equitable share therefore, for the purposes of providing the necessary off-mite inprovcsents required by the Renton Subdivision Ordinance. • Said iaprovegents shall ir1ude but may not be limited to the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street paving, undergrounding of utilities, and street lighting. STORM DRAINAGE Storm drainage plane shall be approved by the Public Morko Department, City of Renton, according to requirements of applicable ordinances and policies of the City of Renton, and, if possible, to the effect of reducing water pending on Queen Avenue M.E. under • reasonable obligations to the owners of the above described property. DUPATION • These covenants shall run with the land and expire on Deconber 31, 2025, provided all of those covenants aro fulfilled and completed in accordance herewith. Any violation or breach of theca restrictive covenants nay be enforced by proper legal procedures In the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any other property owners adjoining described property who are adversely affected by said breach. Reasonable attorneys' fees incurred during an enforcement proceeding will be borne by the party or parties whom the court determines is in error and shall be entered as a judgement in such action. • (4)914--, • y N. , Dr. • sThea Margaret hall STATE OF WASHINGTON) COUNTY OF KING On this A/dny of s'. l l�7 , 197 before me personally appeared ,c Q24Y- the rsons who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persona for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set cry hand and affixed my.official seal the day and year first above written. //; (4;e..e.:0_-/Lc- • Nota /Public in and for.t11o/9tat of Wa hington, residing at��TT. • . t 11 dy/ -2- OF I o� z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT WARREN' C. GONNASON, P.E. • DIRECTOR °' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 9A `O 206 235-2569 O �P 9�TFD SEP- `° CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR April 10, 1979 TO: L. Rick Beeler, Land Use Hearing Examiner FROM: Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Brentwood Park Addition PP-316-79 This is in response to your desire for comment on the applicant's request for a waiver of off-site improvements for Queen Ave. NE. We would not object to the granting of a waiver of off-site improve- ments on Queen Ave. NE as the public health, safety and welfare would not be adversely affected if said waiver were granted. In the event that the applicant wishes .to have the off-site improve- ments on NE 10th Street and NE 12th Street waived in view of the fact that the properties fronting on 10th and 12th are not a part of his proposed improvement but will be included in the final plat, we would have no objections to the granting of said waiver subject to restrictive covenants providing for future improvements and participate in L.I.D. 's for said improvements. Public health, safety and welfare would not be adversely affected if said waiver were granted with the stated conditions. The improvement requirements for Pierce Ave. NE north of lot #1 should be sufficient to provide for a complete intersection at this point and said improvements shall be subject to the approval of the Public Works Department. WCG:ad RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AIR 1 ® 1979 EXEC fIT NO g A718 9 f JI 12 C P6 ITEM NO. -. i _ ��7 ` Ic71a711019911G91a; :�i''2+9P� RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 271979 PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER AM PN 718191101111120 t2s31415if PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 27 , 1979 EXHIBIT NO, / APPLICANT : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . ITEM NO. r/--,6/( -7 9 FILE NO : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , E-318-79 , W-319-79 (BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION ) A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant seeks preliminary plat approval of an 11 -lot single family subdivision . In addition , there are requests, for an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance concerning pipestem lots , cul -de-sac length and deletion of turnaround , and a waiver of off-site improve- ments . (Site development map attached . ) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : 1 . Owners of Record : JAMES VANDERMAY & RAY BALL , SR. 2 . Applicant : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . 3 . Location : Southeast corner of Pierce Avenue (Vicinity Map Attached ) N . E . and, N . E . 12th Street 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description , is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ±4 . 76 acres 6 . Access : Via N . E . 12th Street and Pierce Avenue N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning : GS- 1 , General Classification District ; R-1 , Residential Single Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : ' GS-1 , R- 1 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on March 16 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 14 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1965 dated May. 27 , 1959 . That portion of the plat proposed for 7200 square foot 'lots was rezoned by Ordinance #3288 of March 5 , 1979 and Ordinance #2650 of August 11 , 1971 . D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND : . 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level . 2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material , (AmC ) . Runoff is medium, erosion hazard is moderate to severe . This soil is used for urban development . . 3.' Vegetation : The site consists of a mixture of deciduous trees , blackberries and grass undergrowth . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY ,:REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79 PAGE TWO BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION 4. - W;il,dlf'e : Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No ,surface water was observed on the subject site . 6 . Land Use : An existing single family residence is located in the northerly portion of the subject site and St . Andrews United Presbyterian. Church is found in the south part . The property adjacent to the east consists of developed single family residences as are the lots to the west. To the north is a parcel of undeveloped single family zoned property and a single family subdivision. E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are principally single family residential in nature . F . PUBLIC SERV.ICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : Existing 6" water mains are located on the N . E . llth Street , N . E . 10th Place , N . E . 10th Court and Pierce Avenue N . E . 8" sewer mains are located along Pierce Avenue N . E . and N . E . 12th Street and a 6" sewer main is located on N . E . llth Street. In addition , an 8" storm drain is located on Pierce Avenue N . E . at N . E . llth Street . Development of the property will require extension of water and sewer utilities . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Department per ordinance requirements . 3. Transit : Metro Transit Route #107 operates along N . E . 12th Street adjacent to the subject site . 4. Schools : The site is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary School , within three-quarters of a mile of McKnight Junior High School , and within two miles of Hazen High School . 5 . Recreation : The existing Kiwanis Park is located approximately one-half mile south of the subject site . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-706 , R- 1 , Residence Single Family . 2 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District . H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1106 ; Preliminary Plat Require- ment.s . 2 . Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1105 . 66 ; Waived Improvements . 3. Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1109 ; Exceptions . 4. Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report , 1965 , Objective 6 , page 18 ; and .Residential , Page 11 . I . ;IMPACT ON THE NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development of the subject site will disturb soils , remove vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures , however , these impacts can be mitigated . • PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79 PAGE THREE BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION 2 . Population/Employment : The proposed plat of 9 new lots will increase the population by approximately 32 persons (-3 . 5 persons/ home times 9 homes ) . 3 . Schools : The proposed plat will increase the school population by approximately 5 students ( . 5 students/home times 9 homes ) . These new pupils are likely to be scattered throughout the grades and not significantly impact the existing services . 4 . Social : Increased opportunity for social interaction will result from development of the subject site . 5. Traffic : The new subdivision will increase traffic in the area by approximately 90 trips per day ( 10 trips/unit times 9 new units ) . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : ; Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended, RCW 43-21C , a negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued for the subject proposal K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS. CONTACTED : (See Comments . Attached ) 1 . City of Renton' Building Division . 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton Utilities Division . 5 . City of Renton: Fire Department. 6. City of Renton Parks Department . 7 . Renton School District No . 403 (no response received) . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS ; 1 . The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of single family residential use of the site and surrounding area . 2 . The proposed plat is consistent with the adjacent single family uses and nearby subdivisions . 3. The proposed lots range in size from 7380 square feet to 73 , 250 square -Feet for the remaining church area and are consistent with the minimum lot size requirements of the R-1 and GS-1 zones . These lot sizes are also `compatible with the Studebaker ' s Addition to the west and the lots to the east on Queen Avenue N . E . 4. The proposed plat will reduce the existing - setback of the church buildings to 25 ' which is below the 100 ' minimum required by the GS- 1 District. The applicant has requested a variance application approval from the Board of Adjustment. Approval of this plat should include the requirement for approval' of said variance of modification of the plat to conform to the setback . 5 . The proposed plat will leave Queen Avenue N . E . as a cul -de-sac exceeding the minimum length allowed by the subdivision ordinance , and not providing for the required 45 ' radius. turnaround . The applicant by his letter of February 21 , 197.9 has requested exceptions to allow the over length cul -de-sac and delete the required turnariound . Further a waiver of the street improvements for this street has been requested . The applicant states that the proposed plat is not oriented to Queen Avenue N . E . and will therefore have no effect on this portion of the street. Subject to a vehicular access restriction to Queen Avenue N . E . , this appears to be the case . Development PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79 PAGE FOUR BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION of the plat as proposed does insure a long-term cul -de-sac , however , no adverse comments from any departments were received . The Hearing Examiner should consider provision of a minimum turnaround for emergency vehicles at the south end of Queen Avenue . 6. The applicant' s request for waiver of the off-site improvements is addressed to Queen Avenue N . E . only , however, as noted by the Engineering Division , the waiver should also address N . E . 10th Court , and N . E . 12th Street . All three streets , due to their location or lot design to not appear to be directly effected by any additional traffic movements as a result of this plat . Only the Engineering Division directly addressed this request , and refers the matter to the Hearing Examiner without comment. However , future improvement of N . E . 10th Court and N . E . 12th Street should be insured by adoption of restrictive covenants . All normal street improvements (curb , gutter , sidewalk , storm drainage , paving , etc . ) should be included . 7. Improvements to Pierce Avenue N . E . are proposed only on lots 1 through 4 , and not including across lot A at the intersection of N . E . llth Place . In order to assure the public health , safety , and welfare all street improvements (curb , gutter , sidewalk , storm drainage , paving and street lighting ) shall be extended to the northerly limit of Lot A. Without said improvements the increased traffic at N . E . llth and Pierce intersection will create the potential for impaired traffic safety . 8. The applicant has requested exceptions to the subdivision ordinance to allow pipestem lot arrangement for Lots 5 and 6 . The proposed lot 5 conforms to the 20 ' by less than 150 ' criteria established by ordinance . Lot 6 does not appear to be a pipestem lot. Lot 5 should be approved as it will have no apparent adverse impact on the general public . 9 . Lot 4 , a corner lot, is not platted wider than the adjoining interior lots . The lot should be widened such that the average width is at least 75 ' (about 10 ' additional width to the north ) . 10. The Parks Department indicates a critical need for recreational space in this general neighborhood . Recreational space should be required prior to final approval of the plat (see memo attached ) . 11 . Approval of the plat should be subject to final plan approval for street storm drainage and utility improvements and provision of a utility easement and storm drainage provisions from Queen Avenue N . E . to N . E . llth Court . Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . M . DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval subject to : • 1 . Improvement of Pierce Avenue N . E . to the north line of Lot A per analysis #7 . Privision for future improvement of Pierce Avenue by L . I . D . is provided by covenant dated February , 1979 . 2 . Widening of Lot #4 to 75 ' width . 3. Provision of a 15 ' utility easement and storm drainage provisions across lot 4 from Queen Avenue N . E . to N . E . 10th Court . 4. Final approval of street, storm drainage , and utility plans by the Public Works Department prior to installation of the improvements . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , Files No : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79 PAGE FIVE BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION 5 . Approval of a variance of the minimum building setback ordinance for the Methodist Church or revision of the plat to comply with the setback . 6 . Approval of the exception to allow pipestem ' lot arrangement for Lot 5 . 7 . Approval of the exception to the cul -de-sac length ,-ad provision of a minimum emergency vehicle turnaround for Queen Avenue N . E . �,.t4j . 8 . Approval of the waiver of off-site improvements for Queen Avenue N . E . , and, approval of a waiver subject to covenants for future improvement of N . E . 12th Street and N . E . 10th Court. ....._ 1)114 i vv . . NOLU44V1 't 600P) ,,.: 1 :'10 , I / ,, , . , g .,. _ . ‘,,,,,, i 1�J j I i�l s. r ,"T,�� a , _ 0 • ;��� � se �,,,...r 1 4- 5 j :, ,-,-, ,„ ..„ u 1 i 1:3 - • Si (Jt11 Wo: g� t id t1100 �N AIL El t B i 0 t tifi , I . E3 1:3 ra 0 roi= CDi CI C t __03 pit 0 • 7/, ct, A)m; 1 gs,- 1 0 ,„ ; 4 4. \ 4 ir '..,.t.2..14'..fettesz „... '` 1 0 II ; airy BI '` ,cf; gall Div ® - t, x,., , m/ ® ® 1. Ci CO .NM C d ANC k \ 1111 In i .4 t 0 tuc. . ... , tA i uj r 8PL :: °pro 1 -7t 0 „, , ,. A - 744 CO C3 In C3 C 0 3 ‘... V ) .. 3\ '‘- \,,, ' % 0 ,,,t 1 al 0 1% 11 \ )1 ��J ' .t. 10 t" 1 Ci ri , . \ 11 \ 0 1 1 f , A t„ \ , 1.--.5 7 . . i ) a ciewn \ ED ,?zi a ' 0: * oca Pat ®a°� 0 , @II v'i � a b snr palm' 'il t 1 � ,\ 1 0 ri 0 61 0 ( 2troAuf71 ''' 1 is I No- 0 'i ca Q " p • a°5-9 . . tk== es r fs ) 0 a f 1 .., . .. \ ;\ I 41,,,,,, • .,04.01 .a'" ---..-----• • Aj"'42"c?X1.----- I I i • \ .. I i t . M• . I 14 • 1 4, \\ 1 ( I i • , • I i• , •i• \ N1.'4 "I I. .., I \ I i I '1% II . .0 t d . • . , 7 ,i • ' . i 1 ii \ J49, ft,,mrgi.7 4)......L. . in:d7.7;7: - -- ftv ....,,, .tiv \--- f , , , rs • . 1 -- , . ,. . , s - ' 1 " ; -i; '.. .• 1 so '.:4,, $ , , gi ' '' 1 , . ' „cs‘ ll '10 ' '•. •, 4 \,.....,:i , .,/, / : es, g s. s. ••• k•- i 4-r--1. • .......... i ,, • .„ .1) .. . • . ..'1 ;1.1.i. ., . • •cli N ' , '' .2,j ; ' -''''''' •1 ‘ Qi) 't 4 s 0 i..i.7 .. a..,;i:,.r;e- 'j°' ,• t; i' i 1 2 ., , — • ..•...VW/0 I 0 w:i e4, • ---'''•• .• - .. ••-----?; i...r.z ,, ,14: i...... , , ,.... . . .4.1,4 ,, . ' ,4: • ft,„ , ..."-.1i2•',..,V'i i .,,' •.!:).11, :.>.\ • -kW , •,•., r-, , ,...., . .. ,,,. ,:.... , ..,„... . . .„.„... ,,, .. ..lft 0 . . . ' -. -- -• I 6.7A -„, art . k '• ,, .-- 14 . , , • , 1 e, • 1 LI ! MioW.1.1 ! 14 ' '. I 4 . .. I. , . --------L.—--, 1. I. 1 . , 1; ,1 . 1 I .i4 I i? ',..;1 1 1 1—._........---1 4,,N. ' , • i b g ‘ ! 41' ‘i . . .. ; 1 • 1 ...01 .. , , 1 ....._.._........ 0 1 ..,, . . ,: I ,b h • q 1 • • 1 1 .a v D . • \ k e. • S :3 • ,. - .. 'iti' ,1 d' * P Z1‘ :•L` 4 t 1 •1 .14,/ 1 i.-.... . . . . .7 \Iti..„:‘, •G 41-. - t`41 i ix' .19//IN 1 - .‘.i• '1 :11•1 ---- ' •!9..1. , , • : .' ,i i ' i I-• ill I • ll S •.% - 1 I ' ..... ilf% , I H. 1..., . Ii .,. ..ii . ,_. , 1 ,picl, ,(4., .73 ,-, 1 . t•"'4.‘ IS '..--"s.1 /ell I .1q .,L. . • f•4 , ] ',1 •V' \ , , s: k ,i i ,.. ...1 ,_.,...•. 4;k ii•e I.t! / litti tti _'•il.it'l . i it% . uti I . I " . . . • . , ‘ I I 1 , ••• It/. ' • .'• r (11 CCikrie N 9 . oP r-• -7.y...),....8 ..$7,.- . pi...." ---- - - ----. - 4 - . iAl ) • ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: Q. Finance Department Fire- Department Library Department ® Park Department 8/ police_ Department Public Works Department (:) juilding Div. engineering Div . (Please verif legs) descrip n) = ' Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his 2gn/eg.; fri / / DATE: 0/49 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : / W'4 i'ii4wié LOCATION `., �,✓ �'' / ( APPLICATION S) : /�, &/./l f rir ?/9-4. ge 7 /4"1 .W W1 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING- . I� RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : ,";;'/ / / REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: -�- EM Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : Nr-el ‘,..e.--a/14-Z-•%,- L'J defr1/-- N5 A -Cov,,az- N. ".` .sve X0(771 -1�§lgnature of Direcior or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: (2) ' Finance Department 8' . Fire Department Library Department ® Park ,Department Police Department ® Public Works Department ® Building Div. E gineering Div. (Please verify legal description) e Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or, his 2;Fet: //) 15r5 DATE : 0* PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT: Agie LOCATION: d! APPLICATIONS : ' t.��� 1/7/4145'26 ( ) _"/ r,0 i1. 4 •*eti, i r iz p 0/g- W/ .✓✓I eogee- /9y- r. IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING • ; IN'� RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BY : AO /6 4/ 7 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : Te mFoec EWE,®°'ksesee# '( EC Approved Cn Not Approved. Comments or conditions : Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: ® Finance Department. 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department Police Department ® Public } rks Department Building Div . OEngineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Departments ( signed by responsible official or his d igne ie �/�/� �� V DATE : / 4 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : LOCATION : L 40/, ` ' APPLICATION(S) • A' 44 0 6e#0.7-0-71 iffi5101 ,•4e -,- 411V Ve- Alle-ve ogee- ?,<9.7, „ - - A0freaoddie* IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING INL RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY :: "i,JJ� /4 /I REVIEW BY OTHER CITY >DEPARTMENTS : Department : C., ,_1 ) -� Co_Approved Not Approved mments or conditions : S ( ( Signature of-"Director 'or Authorized Representative Date /// ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® 'Finance Department e Fire Department 41 Library Department /7 Park Department " Police Department / Public Works Department 0 Building Div. 0 Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description ) /,Traffic Engineering Div . \, _. £/d - -i Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , ( signed by responsible official or his d igne ie 4!ri 61/5 DATE : 9/09 PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : . �� �� �. APPLICANT : __ 0/1 �'" 4l LOCATION : f - I. /+ ' APPLICATI0N(S) �i" 111:'/if ; e hl /fflr% ALL' ' / / ''`'. 0 7 9) 6,6 1 t 1 1 41947 71 IA • . •#/ 0. ..511 '''' 9/9-4. IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING V, IN." RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : ioor ,/, REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : e ,E1 Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : �, I) Ca"' r 'd F,re }.\..�c{rc0INtf (Sk� II ke 1rNs7il!ed clod veuc�y Co IQ Lk se, 0}-eolO LS To ClYlL.+ loI,�% 1c ),Nci CohS Y'Ltc Toll .. Lk)a -kV` ik, cfI}� 51zes cir.Ci 1r, Sri1IctI i,ui� LA rtciIit►r-ec-I 6L1 v.Nct"1er u OA 7esr . 4' p 1,3 cu? C0 3 - 1 -2_ - 7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : (TRL ,T r' Approved En Not Approved Comments or conditions : I-)/tw1,2,c urk ,r.its P -. C.' S Part c r-, sr►is i 1p , 4.....,,s.1T9.c .t SI$w,dil STe7. C1-1G5 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ®? kt.4 � ® THE CITY OF RENTON xtin MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 A -I " ", CHARLES J. DELAURENT0,NIAVOR 0 PARKS and RECREATION Yea (of JOHN E. WE®LEY - DIRECTOR 44, SEA RENTON PARK DEPARTMENT BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT The proposed development, in itself, does not constitute a major impact on our Parks & Recreation system. However, several such actions have recently occurred in this planning area and cumulatively provide a significant impact. Kiwanis Park is located in this area and provides a substantial recreational land base, however, it is not sufficient to handle the total service area. According to the City's' Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan, the #2 and #3 acquisition projects for the City lay north and south of this development (#1 and #2 on a neighborhood basis) . The impetus to acquire a site in the Sierra Heights area is absolutely critical. • • • PROPOSED/FINAL i.)L..CLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE .N-SIGNIFICANCE Tentative Plat Application No . 285-79 PROPOSED Declaration • Environmental Checklist No . ECF-4?7-79 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant proposes a 9-lot single family subdivision (proposed Brentwood Park AdditionL_____�._. Proponent BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Location of Proposal Between Queen Ave. N.E. and Pierce Ave. N.E. in the vicinity of N.E. 11th Street. Lead Agency RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is [� is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) ( c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : _ This declaration of non-significant impact is subject to provision of appropriate development measures and standards to mitigate any potential _ adverse environmental effects , and subject to the modifications proposed.____ Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non- significance : — Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Planninc{ Di Actor Date February 8, 1979 Signature City of Renton Planning Department (// � 5-76 n NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 10 , 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. BEL TERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP. (BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION) , APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH AND DELETION OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, Files E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79; property located in the vicinity of N.E. llth and Pierce Ave. N.E. 2. THE AUSTIN COMPANY, APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE, File SP-321-79; property located east of FAI-405, west of Lincoln Ave. N.E. , in the 1700 block of N.E. 44th Street. 3. C.H.G. INTERNATIONAL, INC. (EARLINGTON WOODS) , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, File MP-PUD?178; APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO ZONING ORDINANCE RE. PARKING, File E-244-78; AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO ZONING ORDINANCE RE. DENSITY, File E-243-78; property located at Hardie Ave. S.W. between Sunset Blvd. W. and Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way. Applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. • ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON April 10, 1979 AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED March 30. 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION TEVE UNSDN , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABM DOCUMENT WERE PA�QQSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIEVA' AB'(IvE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed an;d, sworn to before me, a Notary, Public , on the 28th dayof ri��j 19 ` ', SIGNED Ita2.42)144-,"a...4->n, OFA. 6 © z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTO .WASH.90065 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 01 Q• 235- 2550 '.11Tto serf March 23, 1979 Belterra Development Corporation 12843 N.E. 14th Place Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH AND DELETION OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS, Files E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79; property located in the vicinity of N.E. 11th and Pierce Ave. N.E. Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 5, 1979 . A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for April lfl, 1g74 at 9:00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present . All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing . If you have any further questions , please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Planning D 7.ctor By: �C vid R. Clemens Associate Planner cc: Eastside Consultants, Inc. James Vandermay Ray Ball , Sr. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON APRIL 10 , 19 79 , AT 9 : 00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. BEL TERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP. (BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION) , APPLICATIONS FOR EXCEPTIONS TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING PIPESTEM LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH AND DELETION OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-$ITE IMPROVEMENTS, Files E-317-79, E-318-79, and E-319-79; property located in the vicinity of N.E. 11th and Pierce Ave. N.E. 2. THE AUSTIN COMPANY , APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT TO FILL AND GRADE IN B-1 ZONE, File SP-321-79; property located east of FAI-405, west of Lincoln Ave. N.E. , in the 1700 block of N.E. 44th Street. 3. C.H.G. INTERNATIONAL, INC. (EARLINGTON WOODS) , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL, File MP-PUD-78; APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO ZONING ORDINANCE RE. PARKING, File E-244-78; AND APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION TO ZONING ORDINANCE RE. DENSITY, File E-243-78; property located at Hardie Ave. S.W. between Sunset Blvd. W. and Burlington Northern Railroad Right-of-Way. Applications noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON April 10, 1979 AT 9 : 00 A . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED March 30, 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION COPI OF THE ABOVEVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BYHBY MEEIIN THREECERTIFY CONSPICUOUSTHATEPLACESS ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIOD ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST : Subscribed a•nd;sworn to before me, a Notary Public , on the 28th day of NlarIch 19 79 SIGNED �� � . NOTICE THIS PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE VICINITY OF N. E. 11TH AND PIERCE AVENUE N. E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A DETAILED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE ON FILE IN THE RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF ,A • PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON APR L 10, 1979 BEGINNING AT 9:QO A.M. P.M. CONCERNING ITEM [J1 ■ REZONE ■ SPECIAL PERMIT ■ SITE APPROVAL ■ WAIVER IISHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMI1 APPLICATION F(R- EX('FPTTUNS Tn THE S RnTvicin RDI'NANCE REGARDING. PIPE- STEM LOTS, CUI,-DE-SAC LENGTH AND DELETION OF TURNAROUND, AND OFF-SITE MPROVEMENIS (BE TER DE ELO M NT ORP--BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION) t-ILE NOS : t-317-/9, h-318-/9, L-519-�I9 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. "A1/45/6 - MAJOR PLAT G1 �t \, DATE REC' D, TENTATIVE // \ (,C�FI'I�'p� (),1‘ � APPLICATION FEE $ 5.5 'oo x PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL FINAL MN 5 10rU } REVIEW FEE $ \ .___.... C// RECEIPT NO.4'7 �� � SM NO. UEn�' � PUD NO . APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 7 : 1 . Plat Name & Location Brentwood Park Addition, N. E . llth & Pierce Ave . , N .E. 2 . No. Lots 11 Total Acreage 4 . 76 Zoning R-72 3 . Owner Bel Terra Development Corporation Phone 454-0539 Address 12843 N. E. 14th Place , Bellevue, Washington 98005 5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed Telephone ( x ) ( ) ( ) Electric ( x ) ( ) ( ) Street Lights ( x ) ( ) ( ) Natural Gas ( x ) ( ) ( ) TV Cable ( x ) ( ) ( ) 6 . Sanitation & Water: ( x ) City Water ( x ) Sanitary Sewers ( ) Water District No . ( ) Dry Sewers ( ) Septic Tanks 7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance . 8 . DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9 . STAFF ACTION: TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED APPEALED EXPIRED 10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : DATE DATE BOND NO. AND TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . Rev. 1/77 _ _ . (0-s1 c)pN • q.V=1,\ . AFF I DAV I T . (-TY ✓�� • Q '>> ..,----7 \.:., .,. \ 0 TAC: Ie L�j7(.1.cQ� r>�.1; /714--1 l z / , being duly sworn,6deClarec' that I am /the owner of t e property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers 'herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me ,✓� this /1 day of, ,-c4�s , 19 % , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at �j.�.%i�i? . �, 1 / ) / 7 ' 2--/' / ' / (Name of Notary ,Public) (Signature of Owner) ;/)7 / e9/l(' 2/A : L Ale i l ;��r 3 9 /_3: - {2.7i 5 (Address), / Address) • (City) (State) 2 5"—C.7,Y`a (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: • • Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 - ,,�\ ca\\I?o . °�\ • �1 AFFIDAVIT Jo1 19-` ) �.,...... �Z,it fVIN EQP/ am the ovfner of the property involved n this�ng applicationdulyrandde thatrthehat I foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this /2Z day of \ �v�..� i� , 197 , , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at/7 -L . . ON r9b /7, __A . . xi ,.. .K,, i..i-ei ./a 4 --i:ii-Z,,L,./ a /L ' (Name Off Notary Pu lic) (Signatu of Owner) /c ; r 1�c /4 ,,-tfh - 16,: � ' ;. (Addres's) ici, (Address) P `A/ /c.N 17-Y>f / (City) (State) (Telephone) • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . Date Received , 19 By: Renton Planning Dept . • 2-73 • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON • `/g• CHECKLIST FORM- - '• r6F ECEIVED �c� C.- ENVIRONMENTAL 24..1979 . : �- ��, FOR OFFICE USE ONLY.f;�,;�. ,�'.e.„ �, - . . - �Yj ..c Application No. c,;?,4---- fn . •. Environmental Checkl_i_s,t. No. .. _5(2, - /c.?7- // -•-. PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: . ODeclaration .of Significance . . ®Declaration of Significance . ® Declaration of Non-Significance ' '. ® Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: . Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposal's. The Act also requires that an .EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. , The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies 'of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with. your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total 'proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the 'proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers , should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though' completion may .not occur. until sometime, in :the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in.the future. . . NOTE: This is a standard,_ form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal ., If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. . , . . ENVIRONMENTAL' CHECKLIST FORM • I. BACKGROUND • , • 1. 2Name of Proponent' ' DC ro 1' diowk 2.'' Address and phone number of Proponent: . • • .7-F)10,t a P,r1.,- ti 1t.?eA ?roe'; 3. 'Date Checklist submitted ,i -',oa�-`,j ' • 4. •-'Agency requiring Checklist (2,l r.3V .4,-� �a4.; ;ia. a.rg �tl*t 5....Name • ' of proposal , if applicable! l ( ,e� ti.1n.A ""- � �r� Ad•o-�;„✓y . . . . . 6. ' Nature and' brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other, factors that will give an.;accurate • understanding of its scope. and nature) : J �i `1. I.r' r•1.irf�•.,.�+i^`, '`b• -2- _ 1 . ▪ ,, ,i4 !' .•' • 1,,. ;7,. Location. ofa,pr,'oposal (describe the •physical setting` of the proposal , as well f�' '. , `as the extent-of the' land area affected by any environmental impacts, including :I any, other,•, inforation needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- :gmnn.ta.l setting of the proposal ) : • .. , a ,-c. i A 1ft_62. &, AV E el tee pi aN 0%7 14 e5c 0(/ 1i y Pl a ur ✓.1rrrti 0 v1�te,Gt ' '.oe ha. .d—ia�.._r...,9 wag , PACILl '. . 8. Estimated date for completion of .the proposal : . • 9. List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal . (federal , state and local--including rezones) : II __Bail P Vie....afl .— sera • 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expa sion, or further activity related• to or •connected_.with this proposal? If yes,,•explain: • 11. ;,Do you know of any, plans .b/ others which may affect .the property covered by ' your, proposal? If explain: • 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- ' , posal ; if;•none has been. completed, but is. expected to be .filed at some future date, 'describe the nature of, such application form: ., • .. emz....) . II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ' (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) • (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes, in,geologic 'substructures? ' ' ' ' ' " - 1S MAYBE NO (b) . Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- . . .... . ._ -covering of the soil? YES .. .MA N (c) ' Change in topography or ground surface relief - ' --features? , .. _ - . - .. YES F ITT . NO (d) The destruction, covering or- modification of• any unique geologic or physical features? .- ., - ' " ' •• � . Yam- MAYBE •NOo . (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils , . , . - either on or off the site? :..... . ...'.......... . . .... :... .. . . ....._ . .. . _.... YES M BE 0 - (f) Changes in deposition or 'erosion'of beach"sands, or' : ,• changes in siltation, deposition'or''erosion which" may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the; ocean or any bay, inlet'`or lake? - '` VET- MAYBE Explanation:' . _ . • . . . . . . • • . , .• . , • ,• . ;- = ,‘'!-,.- . • , . . , . • . . .. . • ! , . . . . • . , . , ' . • , • . ' • . • , . • . -3- • . , • . • • . . ' • . , - - - . , . - (2) -Air. - Wills the proposalyreult 111:: .:;.. . . ' (a) Aicemissiont. or !.deteridiatioi 'Of ambient airl: . ,./- • . quality? . - . -'(. :--.,,..1 ',.:',i,'H . • . • Yrs— MUTE NO , . . . . .• „•:, (b) The creation of,ppjctionaklodclrs?. .,.. . . ,, ', .• ,,, N.,_ , • . . . iy ' irEr*I 'MPTIIT . . ,.. . • •.,!:•.:,. .:rrs, - ••, .......,t : ._,, , . .• ', . . . (c)..-Aiteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, .. . , . •or,any, change ,i clylate„ either .lecaly„or ,,,, ,,,, , ,,,q, ,, . 0 • . , regionally? 4',- ' '': , . ), ,..1.,:. ; ,Y2,:,, ,, ,, r, ,.., ' ,, :. ' , • , . , . - EXPlinitioni . • • , ; • ' --. . . . ' ' •'?,;1•;;:i'f•-01-i.,1 . ;','1 f i : :; '!;, :•:•;.i."'4 j r . ! !:, '7i.. '— ''' d i j . ' .. • . ! . . • - . ., . • • , . • , . , 1 ..• . .. . . . . , . ... • • , : i : ' '.• . ' .. (3) .-Water. .Will,the proposal- result in: • • . • • , ' , . • , . .' (a) Changeiln'currenti. or the. course of direction of , . . .• . , . • , ---- '-: -.- 'water-moVements-i-in-either-marine -or-fresh-waters?- YES., MAYBE MAYBETE A- • , .,: ; , . .. ,:.,2';:•.•:_.:' f ,:,'f:t,1 1 i 3 3 i:;.;`.4 .';',::::'2, 'f ,,"; i ,:•''4•';'•:..•• .: ., I ; , ,•-,, . .: , . „,,,,, _. . _. .;.,-.„..... •.. . .„.- . • - • . ' .),.! •' ' f,•,',I ' ••• .4. (b) ,Changes in: absorption rates', drainage patterns, or . . • , • the rate and amount ,of surface water runoff? ' --- - - . - -• - - . - - • , -MAYBE'; filr • • A . , • , ,, , . I . c) - ?Alteratioils-to the-course or-flow of flood waters? - - - -, •- - -: - • YeT- MAYBE 1467 • . , . . i--, (d) --ChangiHn-the• amount of surface -water-in any water -. --- - • - . • • ', body? K. . • ' '') ' ' ' -- '• '- ',. :''' '‘' ' '' YES-:- MAYBE NO • . • ' _(i) l-'Discharge. into surface waters, or in any alteration • . . . surface water quality, Including but not limited to . - -• - - ' temperature', '-dissolved oxygen or-turbidity? , • - - , , YES MR N . ti). ' Al t e r a t i o n. of the direction or rate of flow of , - . --- -- ' -- -ground waters? •-, -• .- • • - - - - --,• •,. . , _ .. .,.... •_...,._.:.• _ , ..... 4 - ' ' .; t L. , ,, , „,.. ,,t, ,,,-,, '.i. ,'..fl• „ . . ;- • .; t ., ',..; •' • 'I) :: • . ., • .• • •zi ' : .,-E-s MAYBE• :• ....'.. ..L'.-`,,__; .,,,'' , ,''' ; W ,; 4 t• ',• ':•;''","ir' ' ''."'...'"i.• (g) v\Change,rin the quantity of ground waters, either' -'•• T••• - - -- •' - ',. ,• • through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of aniaquifer by cuts or excavations? . • , . . . . . , - - • -• , ----• :-- YES MAYBE' N 1 , . . - , ,, --•• • .. , , • . -.-.1- h)r- Deterioration- in-ground-water quality.-either- through . - - . - • • -- --- . . . ' direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, • .„ . . • , , • ; . phosphatesv•detergents•.-waterborne virus or bacteria, --- --7 --- -- ' or• other substances:intorthe ground waters?. . ,. , • . , • ,. MAYBE. . . , . • ., • . , . .. . • . r r “: '''.' 1.%'''.' '' r. ' . 1''' ' • .' ' • ' . i --,-',' (1) .Reduction in the'aMount'of water 9tnehrise available (- '' ' '' -• -, : ,'-2 , si ' . . . . • .for public water supplies? . . . , `)•' ' ' ' ' YU- MAYBE • Expia`natiOn: 4.3 so or ri," u tea r .474t,f"..„ ¢,e), t ' ,,. ' • : , . , • 4. .141 • ,rt . . .nrOv Ifif. - WI '-ft-N- 174-0.. z -"+l---,, „, . , , .. . t• ., ..,,.. . . .. . .,. . ._. ‘. . • , . . . (4 Y" Flora:-.1111tithe proposal- result in:• . , (a) Change in. the diversity Of,species, or'numbers of 'any... ': ::''''., ',:,,',1,s '' ' ••-• ' , , species' of flora (Including" trees, shrubs; grass;!crops ,‘.';•':-•;,r-, ;y-,;:''' . • mi crofl era-and aquatic:,plants)?.'yr"; ' 1• -: %.,,' ! ••• ' ,..,-, ;, '." ' • '-'••''' '''''' - .J.-. I.1,-?. . - z,i, • - .• , - ' • ••• • - '''-,•• •) - .u.- ' yrs—, MAYBE' . . , • , . _, (b) Reduction : ', of the numbers of any1unique, rare or , • Q.. .•.,- 1- --- --endangered species of flora?' - A ) , . ,. YET- RW . .. .. . , . . . . . . ......... _ _ . __ ....__. . , , (c) Introduction of new species- of flora into an area, or ' - ' - - -- in a barrier to the nCrInal replenishment of existing- - ----- -- - _ - species? • --- - - • - - -------• - • --- • YES MAYBE _ . . . . . (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural Crop? ' ' ' ' • •• . MKYB ... , ,, ,,. . , Explanation: ' . . , • , . . • .... . . .. ..... ,. .. .,. , . • , - - ---• . ._ . - . ' • ,i _.... .., .._...______. ._. „. . . .. . _ . . . .. .. . ., __ _ _ . .. .. , • • . . . .. . . • , . . . • • . ' • , . . , -4- • (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , orfnumbers' of any species of fau•r�a (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish. benthic organisms, ' ( ., - r, ,insects• or microfauna)? YES MAYBE NO' - ; , (b),;- Reduction of the numbers of any unique rare "or ' . ' . �[ .' •endange'red species of fauna? ' /\ l�ES WEE,, NO (c)•' Introduction of new species' 'of fauna into'an 'area, ` ' or result in a barrier to the migration or movement ' ' '' ' '' ' '' ' "of fauna? YES . , MAYBE,. 4-- (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? • - . _ ., ..YES —•MAYBE , Explanation: - . _...... .., . _ . i . : ., • i:. .. • . .. . (6)'" Noi`se':' Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? YES MAYBE . NOS Explanation (7)',: Light' and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare?. „ , . ; ; .i .. .. . . . , . Yam' MAYBE , . . . ,. , • ,.. Explanation: ' (8)•• Land 'Use.''-Will the proposal result in the alteration of the • present or, planned land:use of an area? I • , Y— MAYBE N0� Explanation: i (9),- Natural Resources. Will the`proposal' resul't in: ' - '- (a) Increase in the+ rate of u'se .of,any natural resources? YES MAYBE•' NO (b) 'Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES, M BE fit Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. . Does the .proposal involve a risk of an , explosion or the.,release of' hazardous:' substances' (including, but not limited' to'," oil, pesticides , 'chemicals: or radiation) ', in•the event of an accident or upset conditions? ' ' ' ES ` MAYBE "NO` ' Explanation: , l r e (11 button, density, orhgrowthorateaofetheh rihuman' population , . of an area? Ym MAYBE Explanation: -5- ' (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? YES • MAYBE NI, Explanation: • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: . (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? .YES _ MAYBE NO (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? YES WEE NO (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? YES . MMAYBE N( (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? YES M YBE NO • (er Alterati•ons to waterborne, rail or `air traffic? Y MAYBE 2SL (f) Increasein traffic hazards to motor vehicles, . bicyclists or pedestrians? � YES.. ,. MAYBE NO \ Explanations • • • (14). Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in,4ny of .the following ,areas : . (a) Fire protection?:: . • YES • MAYBE 4— • (b) Police protection? •' YES , MAYBE NO` (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO\ (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? .... YES . . MAYBE N (e) Maintenance of public facilities ;;,including roads? YES MAYBE NCJ� (f) Other• governmental services? • YES .•, WEE NO Explanation: . • .(15) Energy. Will the proposal result in. (a) '.Use 'of substantial 'amounts of fuel or energy? . , " • YES •.. MAYBE ? • ' (b) 'Demand, upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? • YES MAYBE 67 . Explanation: • (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: • (a) Power or natural "gas? • YES MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? vE S MAYBE NO (c) Water? YES MAYBE NO -,' `. - -d-)' Sewer or septic tanks? • YES MAY6� NO', (e) •Storm water`drainage? - . • ...• • - • YES RATITE NO ' (f) Solid waste and disposal? ' YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (17) .;Human Health. Will the proposal result' in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? :7 . , ' YES MAYBEW. C .. , . . Explanation: (18) )Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of • ' any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the _proposal result in the creation of_.an aesthetically offensive: ; i site open to' public .view? _ frE—S MAYBE NO . Explanation: ' . (10) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the ; ,. : - 'quality'_or quantity of existing recreational 'opportunities? Y-� RATITE" . . , . („,, Explanation: (20) 'Archeological/Historical . Will ,the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical ,.site, structure, object'or building?',..., ES MAYBE . NUS Explanation: • III. -..SIGNATURE ....... . .. . ... • ., . . . __. .._.... .._.... ......... _ ._ .. • .I , the undersigned, state that to -the best `of"my knowl'edge 'the above information is true and complete. Itis understood:that the,_l,ead agency.may ,withdraw any decla-. -ration of; non-significance 'that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or will k of fu 1 dis losure on my part. ` Proponent. '-- s gn`ed name, p i me . , City of Renton Planning Department . . ,• 5-76 OF R4, O THE CITY OF RENTON 4D c1;07 U %0 Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 Z mil, CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 ® 235- 2550 O90 mac, TFD SEP1s March 9; 1979 Dr. Gary Kohiwes Superintendet Renton School District 430 Main Avenue South Renton , Washington 93055 RE : BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION , 11 - lot Single Family Subdivision ; File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , E-318-79 and W-319-79 ; vicinity of NE lith and Pierce Avenue NE Dear Dr. Kohiwes : Enclosed is a copy of BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION We would appreciate any comments by March 26 , 1979 . If we receive no comments by that time , we will - assume you have no objections . Should you have any questions , please contact this department . Very truly yours , Gor Y . Ericksen P1 wing Dir G avid . C emens Associate Planner DRC:wr Enclosure (- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON , WASHINGTON, ON MARCH 27 , 19 79 , AT 9:00 A. M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1. GENE 0. FARRELL, APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF •35-LOT SINGLErFAMILY SUBDIVISION (WEATHERED WOOD NO. 2) , File PP-315-79 ; property located at N.E. 23RD STREET AND EDMONDS AVE. N.E. 2 . BEL TERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP. , APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT .AP'ROVAL OF,.11- ! SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISIO ' C1004PBOD , File PP-316-79 ; property located in the vicinity of N.E. llth and Pierce Ave. N.E. Legal descriptions of files noted above on file in the Renton Planning Department. ALL INTERESTED =PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 27 . 1979 AT 9 :00 A. M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. GORDON Y . ERICKSEN PUBLISHED March 16 , 1979 RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I + STEVE MUNSON , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE- COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW . ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to beforeo Mme, a Notary Public , • onthe \ - day of � «�,� 19 19 -VI SIGNED OF R4,. 0 ..-., 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U ®y �?; Z' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.�55 n alL " CHARLES J. DELAURENTI,MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 m. 235- 2550 -"ep SEPt° March 12 , 1979 Bel Terra Development Corporation 12843 N. E. 14th Place Bellevue ,t Washington 98005 RE: NOTICE OF APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF 11-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION ( BRENTWOO.D PARK ADDITION) , File PP-316-79 ; property located in the vicinity of N . E . 11th and Pierce Ave. N. E . Dear Sirs : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on March 5 , 1979 A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for March 27 , 1979 at 9 :00 a . m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department, 235-2550. Very truly yours , Gordon Y. ' cksen Planning irector / , By : G ___�� _ avid R. Clemens Associate Planner cc : Eastside Consultants , Inc . James Vandermay Ray Ball , Sr. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC. HEARING MARCH 27 , 1979 APPLICANT : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . FILE NO : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , E-318-79 , W-319-79 (BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION ) A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST : The applicant seeks preliminary plat approval of an 11 -lot single family subdivision . In addition , there are requests for an exception to the Subdivision Ordinance concerning pipestem lots , cul -de-sac length and deletion of turnaround , and a waiver of off-site improve- ments . (Site development map attached . ) B . GENERAL INFORMATION : . 1 . Owners of Record : JAMES VANDERMAY & RAY BALL , SR . 2 . Applicant : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . 3. Location : Southeast corner of Pierce Avenue (Vicinity Map Attached) N . E . and N . E . 12th Street 4 . Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department. 5 . Size of Property : ±4. 76 acres 6 . Access : Via N . E . 12th Street and Pierce Avenue N . E . 7 . Existing Zoning : GS-1 , General Classification District; R-1 , Residential Single Family 8. Existing Zoning in the Area : GS-1 , R-1 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Single Family Residential 10. Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Record Chronicle on March 16 , 1979 and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City ordinance on March 14 , 1979 . C . HISTORY/BACKGROUND : The subject site was annexed into the City by Ordinance #1965 dated May 27 , 1959 .- That portion of the plat proposed for 7200 square foot lots was rezoned by Ordinance #3288 of March 5 , 1979 and Ordinance #2650 of August 11 , 1971 . • D . PHYSICAL BACKGROUND.: 1 . Topography : The site is relatively level . 2 . Soils : Arents , Alderwood material , (AmC ) . Runoff is medium , erosion hazard is moderate to severe . This soil is used for urban development. 3. Vegetation : The site consists of a mixture of deciduous trees , blackberries and grass undergrowth . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79 PAGE TWO BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION 4. Wildlife : Existing vegetation may provide suitable habitat for birds and small mammals . 5. Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site . 6. Land Use : An existing single family residence is located in the northerly portion of the subject site and St. Andrews United Presbyterian Church is found in the south part. The property adjacent to the east consists of developed single family residences as are the lots to the west. To the north is a parcel of undeveloped single family zoned property and a single family subdivision . E . NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTERISTICS : The surrounding properties are principally single family residential in nature . F . PUBLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : Existing 6" water mains are located on the N . E . llth Street , N . E. 10th Place , N . E . 10th Court and Pierce Avenue N . E . .8" sewer mains are located along Pierce Avenue N . E . and N . E . 12th Street and a 6" sewer main is located on N . E . 11th Street. In addition , an 8" storm drain is located on Pierce Avenue N . E . at N . E . llth Street . Development of the property will require extension of water and sewer utilities . 2. Fire Protection : Provided by .the—Renton Fire Department per ordinancE requirements . 3. Transit: Metro Transit Route',#107 operates along N . E . 12th Street adjacent to the subject site . 4. Schools : The site is within one-half mile of Honeydew Elementary School , within three-quarters of a mile. of McKnight Junior High School , and within two miles of Hazen High School. 5. Recreation : The existing Kiwanis Park is, located approximately one-half mile south of the subject site . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE ZONING CODE : 1 . Section 4-706 , R-1 , Residence Single Family'. 2 . Section 4-729 , "G" , General Classification District. H . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT : 1 . Subdivision Regulations , Section. 9-1106 ; Preliminary Plat Require- ments . 2 . Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1105 . 6B; Waived Improvements . 3. Subdivision Regulations , Section 9-1109 ; Exception's . 4 . Comprehensive Plan , Land Use Report, 1965 , Objective 6 , page 18; and Residential , Page 11 . I . IMPACT ON THE NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Development, of the subject site will disturb soils , remove vegetation , increase storm water runoff and have an effect on traffic and noise levels in the area . Through proper development controls and procedures , however , these impacts can be mitigated . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79 PAGE THREE BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION 2 . Population/Employment: The proposed plat of 9 new lots will increase the population by approximately 32 persons (3 . 5 persons/ home times 9 homes ) . 3 . Schools : The proposed plat will increase the school population by approximately 5 students ( . 5 students/home times 9 homes ) . These new pupils are likely to be scattered throughout the grades and not significantly impact the existing services . 4 . Social : Increased opportunity for social interaction will result from development of the subject site . 5 . Traffic : The new subdivision will increase traffic in the area by approximately 90 trips per day (10 trips/unit times 9 new units ) . J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION : Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C , a . negative declaration of environmental impact has been issued for the subject proposal . K. AGENCIES/DEPARTMEN-TS CONTACTED : (See Comments Attached ) 1 . City of Renton Building Division. 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division . 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division . 4. City of Renton, Utilities Division . 5. City of Renton Fire Department. 6. . City of Renton Parks Department . 7 . Renton School District No . 403 (no response received ) . L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS : 1 . The subject' proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of single family residential use of the site and surrounding area . 2 . The proposed plat isconsistent with the adjacent single family uses and nearby subdivisions . 3. The proposed lots range in size from 7380 square feet to 73 , 250 square feet for the remaining church area and are consistent with the minimum lot size requirements of the R-1 and GS- 1 zones . These lot sizes are also compatible with the Studebaker' s Addition to the west and the lots to the east on Queen Avenue N . E . 4. The proposed plat will reduce the existing setback of the church buildings to 25 ' which is below the 100 ' minimum required by the GS- 1 District . The applicant has requested a variance application approval from the Board of Adjustment. Approval of this plat should include the requirement for approval of said ' variance of modification of the plat to conform to the setback . 5 . The proposed plat will leave Queen Avenue N . E . as a cul -de-sac exceeding the minimum length allowed by the subdivision ordinance , and not providing for the required 45 ' radius turnaround . The applicant by his letter of February 21 , 1979 has requested exceptions to allow the over length cul -de-sac and delete the required turnaround . Further a waiver of the street improvements for this street has been requested . The applicant states that the proposed plat is not oriented to Queen Avenue N . E . and will therefore have no effect on this portion of the street. Subject to a vehicular access restriction to Queen Avenue N . E . , this appears to be the case . Development - y PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING: BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , File Nos ; PP-316-79 , E-317-79 , MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79 PAGE FOUR BRENTWOOD PARK .ADDITION of the plat as proposed does insure a long-term cul -de-sac , however, no adverse comments from any departments were received . The Hearing Examiner should consider provision of a minimum turnaround for emergency vehicles at the south end of Queen Avenue . 6. The applicant' s request for waiver of the off-site improvements - is addressed to Queen Avenue N . E . only , however , as noted by the Engineering Division , the waiver should also address N . E . 10th Court , and N . E . 12th Street . All three streets , due to their location or lot design to not appear to be directly effected by any additional traffic movements as a result of this plat . Only the Engineering Division directly addressed this request , and refers the matter to the Hearing Examiner without comment. However , future improvement of N . E . 10th Court and N . E . 12th Street should be insured by adoption of restrictive covenants . All normal street improvements (curb , gutter , sidewalk , storm drainage , paving , etc. ) should be included . 7 . Improvements to Pierce Avenue N . E . are proposed only on lots 1 through 4 , and not including across lot A at the intersection of N. E . llth Place . In order to assure the public health , safety , and welfare all street improvements (curb , gutter , sidewalk , storm drainage , paving and street lighting ) shall be extended to the northerly limit of Lot A. Without said improvements the increased traffic at N . E . llth and Pierce intersection will create the potential for impaired traffic safety . 8. Th.e applicant has requested exceptions to the subdivision ordinance to allow pipestem lot arrangement for Lots 5 and 6. The proposed lot 5 conforms to the 20 ' by less than 150 ' criteria established by ordinance . Lot 6 does not appear to be a pipestem lot. Lot 5 should be approved as it will have no apparent adverse impact on the general public . 9. Lot 4 , a corner lot, is not platted wider than the adjoining interior lots . The lot should be widened such that the average width is at least 75 ' (about 10' additional width to the north ) . 10. The Parks Department indicates a critical need for recreational space in this general neighborhood . Recreational space should be required prior to final approval of the plat (see memo attached) . 11 . Approval of the plat should be subject to final plan approval for street storm drainage and utility improvements and provision of a utility easement and storm drainage provisions from Queen Avenue N . E . to N . E . llth Court. Additional comments of other departments are attached for consideration . M. DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS : Based upon the above analysis , recommend approval subject to : 1 . Improvement of Pierce Avenue N . E . to the north line of Lot A per analysis #7 . Privision for future improvement of Pierce Avenue by L . I . D . is provided by covenant dated February , 1979 . 2. Widening of Lot #4 to 75 ' width . 3. Provision of a 15 ' utility easement and storm drainage provisions across lot 4 from Queen Avenue N . E . to N . E . 10th Court. 4. Final approval of street, storm drainage , and utility plans by the Public Works Department prior to installation of the improvements . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPOORT'TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORP . , Files No : PP-316-79 , E-317-79 MARCH 27 , 1979 E-318-79 , W-319-79 PAGE FIVE BRENTWOOD PARK ADDITION 5 . Approval of a variance of the minimum building setback ordinance for the Methodist Church or revision of the plat to comply with the setback . 6 . Approval of the exception to allow pipestem lot arrangement for Lot 5. 7 . Approval of the exception to the cul -de-sac length and provision of a minimum emergency vehicle turnaround for Queen Avenue N . E . 8. Approval of the waiver of off-site improvements for Queen Avenue N . E . , and approval of a waiver subject to covenants for future improvement of N . E . 12th Street and N . E . 10th Court. G.(5..... / , i . 0 ., rrm ED G3 4=2:71 471 4 41 41 A {- C • Ng 14 ft! sr 0 . "\ 0 az en= I istAvont { 0 W `�:1►'z F , 10t0 on \ fas oR ' Q A O4:1 nil � , 0 \tom_ 9 � 9Sa�0 Q.�i�f ry 0 f, 0 (P i 3E1 , I, ,Len e ; WI 7- 1-. , 6,:', 1 lilt j ' ' i 0 t BD9 D . Di i , sec 0 ,' i , , , I a 1, 1.1 ' 0 r5. , :, 1 0 ± j ` IIiiii• ® ,. ��. , iiii s ; �. iq , %.1 1 Ly , ; \ V' ,,t, \ C Ica, I ht, 3 X C911 I Ca/ t .,. , 1 =- L,..a 0 \ Ntif 6r 0 1 0, 1 R I, ,1164, c, ,,,s/., w L.,,, 5 s ' , 1.'1 „...,,- 11 8 '.' D ci r:j 1=1 ii, c3 E3 MI.,' - 1-1 I , Ej Ill, NE jo r/j PL. : a . .., /rQ lore cr 1 El 0 b liar anoviion i . �., - v i ,p j'�ti . 1 } 0 ,5 .... i i ® ® ® �i 6 y ' ® 1\ 0 1 Ala ek /Of' I I I I 0. "'t .4:4. I:3 ' : A / ,,.,, 60,0 s , Am/106ov . tier Avvrfl0J . .. . .. . , .• , • .....• . . ... . . . , . • • o' I1 i s'•,,..... 4, .. • I \ l;• .,.............._N('`.'*. • . . •mcm ' •,..-..1.m • . . . .). . . % • Ada.449.47 n—.A.....--— • i I I. eg A II3,.Piirl . .._____,:.. i 4 •• . ._•.— .. . 1 r . . 4 \ . , / • •• 14o ' \ ' • 1 • . • . I i • • s • . . I 1. . , . t—I 1 . • . . ---..-- I 6, • . • 1-i : .• ;. 1. . . . i 1\•, r-li I H . . . . . • •::s_ , S. ,. \ is, , , cf)• 1 • . r• ... •... ii • .-- • 1 . " • i. . ' .' , • • • 1-1),JATT • . 11 ' ii • , ( \ 1 * + Lod/d.r../ 9 Iv* • ,( tivairf..: Pxyd froiNi •. .. . - — . -Pal .od . '. . . . . ... -...".. -1 1.1. . - . %. . . -, :WI -". IN•:•, -....., -"g 1 .,.., t ' 1 • , ,. •s P. (S) ?I 01 ,' .1: "4 4 •' s• 4)/ $ I I I Y /// 7. I , 1 • I ,a\'• • if .iTh 1 '• • o , K-°) 11 s,s•, , .. 1. / ,tp:211, W - - , I '•• ' ..•- '' ---...N. I/ _ • , ..•i r.;, ''• ., 1/4 • • •' • •C... "ir oVii . I (1 . -...- i ‘ ,A,...,,, 0• `..1.)1 u 1, 0 1 I . L' .. -/' .,.; '.'.. 2,•;,.....: ‘ , , 4 la ii,1 . 1 . • ; .#-,r, . • ,,,,• • - .--;•:.........;:,. ------/ .,.. ...,„: „ .... . . , ..... i • , • • .. , •,‘ ..- 4.„?........„..u.• . ', ''. " * .. ,.. •.' ,_ ." eo.,1 ,s. ou xte ,,,, .• . . .. , ..- • ,,, . ,4114..,+,i 1,-`,....,..44- &V.A..... , . . . . 1:1, .. --l.k, . r..._...... . .,• ,k.,. • ,., ., .... 4 ".• xatt•••• ,,,,•• • •, • It I ' .lit . , ', i,.. f. ',' ';•$. -•---• • • I/ )i • • • . . : e-..„- -ry %ialr;4 • ‘ ... — Izi - -i • ••• ,.X0 1 t3 • '' i 4 . ., • .•• •.., ic,, .. ...._._ .ow--7--•-a ri !••• • . . . . . . . . , I. \ il , xl• ,, k . . •• . „ . i • -,- , , I i ) RI. il. • . . , \ 1 1.. 11 • ., ......____.7._, __ __ I, • to . . • • . - .. . I . • 1 (I•11 I.. k I.. '. • d . . . 4 1 . .. , . 1 , • . 1 —.00/ • •-1 1, .1 ......-.............. • •, Ii , , ; : '., • • kl a • , . , k . . \ . • i : . F. . • ,1 • ., • . • :::-- z• .4 „ .__. .' * t., 1 .j k) .• VI 1" ' .1rOi , \ ii ' / , , _ — .. —. — l's .4. i i ...) '•• I., ‘•'4 .. ...... .._„: •:•• • et tt v. is •,, t .1/4 III •.. • , I —lf \N;Li I 4 -- • . WI/IN %. 0C ,!". ,q 1Z.• 02 k tr '..:\ ,1 • — ', ‘,.‘;14— • 4. ..; . . . F_ kil • ,. . k•I ..trls..p . . ..1 . .. I . .1, ! tiii ,st .•:.__„ . 1.: I toil% r : i, . • ..i :.,..,i,. . 4,1 . qA „..._., : .._.4.,.,II ...___.. .1 1. 16,1 ,,, o• I.' • . ...cll.:4 • ' •", ... 1 CI VI 1 !.., ...1 t i•V' % 1 • V - ,- f ki.1 I i'iiit • , vis x 4 kt sio .1..... t..,11 . 0 . • -. ,. ,.. I" . ' - • !: Q I ... : I '' • . •4-,s...,,y: • P•1 ,_ ... , •,,.„0..%. , _..... \, ' •' l . • .............. . •,,,414.1'41 • • C7P r, ?,c),....e, 67p-3_._ -1.c.ir., . ii ,,,,,,,i..:. v.,.!/ •tiv 12: ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: ® Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department police Department AD Public Works Department ® [Wilding Div. Engineering Div . (Please verifyi egal descripJ on ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Departments (signed by re V je eiaat, sponsible official or his d igne DATE : /Ø9 . PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT : 4#1, ed'lli/e/Metqe LOCATION : .. ', ,. = `fijt PLICATION S 4.��°1 �'° 1/`%.,'`. M: - . r -/6 79 AP :( � i. ®74/ 71 4aIeI • vaia) /#'Sever-tee �' ins 9/94, r� ,;,,rase fiN. ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARIN ,�, RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : r, ' /6 �" REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department: ( �.-4 =I Approved 4 Not Approved Comments or conditions : E xfe- .- - 4- /9 2) .SiA,)--,- 6..),,, t- zz --/-e----i------`,/cle-,,- t-0‘-- yig-- 44--4--e .._ ,61m,/'c,,,,---(5 v-•_e.,--d__ 1,-e-a-1-24L- A- LA) 0-4-'11-4"-1--- 5' e 6sizi<'-6--,;(-(b--,,,,,,e.:-t-- , /1,4-..)-6,Ae-i--- N /ar/A----4,„,,,,,a9-- i AIL--:/ell-sit- z--14,-(2i 1-e- Le-a4.46-1 Gt-r, 4- 022.-A-1-;t131/ c:74-. A.--,614.)-4C-62,0-k-i,e_ersli..751— / rf-7 / / C,e6449--,-x_.--- X.01 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO: ® Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department ® Park Department ® Police Department Public Works Department 0 Building Div. Engineering Div. (Please verify legal description) e Traffic Engineering Div. Utilities Engineering Div. FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his d igne " ezaM/e) V DATE : 944/AP PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR : APPLICANT: ;410,164WW.ofe - LOCATION : / /� eezAPPLICATIONS) : eked / tele1,0 /0/4 oefee-01/ 76044 IN ORDER TO BE ,INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO. THE HEARING / Ill RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : r.`, /6 79 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : T/ AFAI C CAOi i 50 ./4106 - ,• Approved ® Not Approved Comments or conditions : P 3—/Z —7? Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date i ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : ® Finance Department 8 Fire Department Library Department 0 Park Department ® Police Department ® Public rks Department Building Div. 0 Engineering Div . (Please verify legal description ) 8 Traffic Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his dielpe / ia DATE : 01AP PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: APPLICANT : , /. iii/e/oue LOCATION /// //� f! APPLICATIONS) : � �t� / "2' 4 AW4A /679 e 4/7-7l ,fria 4e i f 00- / eogee- '/9-7. fereiemyeci IN ORDER .TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING ,� % I�� RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : . , , �0 '9 •REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTJIENTS : Department : L--D Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : , -/-- (,e, Li /--.L------------ ___s- 'T2 - 7 Signature o Di rector or Authorized Representative Date ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR APPLICATION TO : Q 'finance Department Fire Department II Library Department ) 0 Park Department / O Police Department O Public Works Department 4 O Building Div. JEngineering Div. (Please verify legal description ) ( raffic Engineering Div . \_.�. 0 /___— 0,0Utilities Engineering Div . FROM: Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his d igne eweier„7 DATE : 9/09 , PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPPLICATION FOR : APP_LICANT :. 41H+J//1Ué LOCATION : /(/! �� ''• e/ APPLICATION(S) Agt#4,tea/ : ffoz ...xy, ;id44:14 -%!/6-79 6e 407-0-# 49e5 lel;4 i i? od?-79&/-e -me og 9/9-71 IN ORDER TO BE INCLUDED IN THE REPORT TO THE HEARING * IN, RETURN ANY COMMENTS TO ` THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY : r� /4 79 REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : _Department : I ._ En Approved Not Approved Comments or conditions : n ()l cc nod 1-1re �h..�clrettr+ 5i � 1i hC 1 -' sTc, lied cArc1 yea ay ``uie (Le_. lof-e0ie is To 04lL.( . b ( % Will Cohs `rrlAC 7i0,1: L'Va-t v, i1 Qin sizes ctr.Ct 1r\ srActf"ion ems• re-9L,t%r-ecc 6ki 0,5oi+er is7L17es6. X,./ n L3 (-L o 3 — 02. - 7 - Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department :} uT►t_. ,rtr s CM Approved � Not Approved Comments or conditions : p(2.vcrrn, urtL.,r,rf.S I)wc S 1°HHet C.7"-, 5i»S 1 4 I ' w.1,i` L .•S/-L w re-"- S'T o c,-t G 5 ( (0A,. 3 -IL- 7, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date •r o THE CITY OF 'r ENTON V ;IV 7. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI MAYOR 0 PARKS and RECREATION JOHN E. WEBLEY - DIRECTOR �,�4 kb SE Pit- • 235-2560 RENTON PARK DEPARTMENT BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT The proposed development, in itself, does not constitute a major impact on our Parks & Recreation system. However, several such actions have recently occurred in this planning area and cumulatively provide a significant impact. Kiwanis Park is located in this area and provides a substantial recreational land base, however, it is not sufficient to handle the total service area. According to the City's Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan, the #2 and #3 acquisition projects for the City lay north and south of this development (#1 and #2 on a neighborhood basis) . The impetus to acquire a site in the Sierra Heights area is absolutely critical. • • • • a - • PROPOSED/FINAL __;LARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE, N-SIGNIFICANCE Tentative Plat Application No . 285-79 0 PROPOSED Declaration Environmental Checklist No . FCF-4?7-79 0 FINAL Declaration Description of proposal Applicant proposes a 9-lot single family subdivision (proposed Brentwood Park Addition). Proponent BELTERRA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Location of Proposal Between Queen Ave. N.E. and Pierce Ave. N.E. in the vicinity of N.E. 11th Street. Lead Agency RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal has been determined to 0 have ® not have a significant adverse impact upon the environment . An EIS 0 is ® is not required under RCW 43 . 21C . 030 (2 ) (c ) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist 'and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental significance : This declaration of non-significant impact is subject to provision of appropriate development measures and standards to mitigate any potential adverse environmental effects , and subject to the modifications_proposed.___ Measures , if any , that could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration of significance and issue a ( proposed/final ) declaration of non- significance : • Responsible Official Gordon Y. Ericksen Title Plannin Dir ctor Date February 8, 1979 Signature City of Renton Planning Department 5-76