Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA00-007 May 8, 2000 `' Renton City Council Minutes 188 The Committee further recommended that the ordinance regarding this matter be presented for first reading. MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. (See page 188 for ordinance.) ORDINANCES AND The following resolutions were presented for reading and adoption: RESOLUTIONS Resolution#3456 A resolution was read approving the Windsong Division I final plat; 11.55 acres Plat:Windsong Division I,NE in the vicinity of Hoquiam Ave.NE and NE 4th St. (FP-99-143). MOVED BY 4th St/Hoquiam Ave NE (FP- CLAWSON, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE 99-143) RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution#3457 A resolution was read adopting amendments to the April 1996 Auto Mall Planning: Auto Mall Improvement Plan. MOVED BY KEOLKER-WHEELER, SECONDED BY Improvement Plan, 2000 CORMAN, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Amendments The following ordinances were presented for first reading and referred to the Council meeting of 6/05/00 for second and final reading: Budget: 2000 Mid- An ordinance was read appropriating funds from fund balance, increasing the Year/Carryforward Budget expenditures in various funds and departments, and increasing the 2000 Budget. Adjustments MOVED BY PARKER, SECONDED BY PERSSON, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/05/00. CARRIED. Planning: Auto Mall Boundary An ordinance was read amending Section 9-14-11 of Chapter 14,Vacations,of Changes Title IX(Public Ways and Property)of City Code by describing the Administrative Procedure for Right-of-Way Vacations. MOVED BY CLAWSON, SECONDED BY CORMAN, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE FOR SECOND AND FINAL READING ON 6/05/00. CARRIED. The following ordinance was presented for second and final reading and adoption: Ordinance#4843 An ordinance was read amending Sections 4-4-100.B and H of Chapter 4, Planning: Downtown Property Development Standards, of Title 4 (Development Regulations)of City Identification Sign Revisions Code by amending downtown identification sign regulations. MOVED BY CORMAN, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS Councilperson Keolker-Wheeler presented a check in the amount of$6,666.80 to SCA: Renton's Share of the City from the Suburban Cities Association,which represents Renton's share Buildable Lands Funds of King County's growth management buildable lands funds. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY SCHLITZER, SECONDED BY NELSON, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 9:00 p.m. BRENDA ARLINE, Deputy City Clerk ir,A_r, CITY )11 RENTON -- 5.��/.7:�fA Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator January 05, 2000 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC)on (ERC date): DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AUTO MALL OVERLAY ZONE AMENDMENTS LUA-00-007,ECF Non-project Action: Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A"and Area"B"of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A"and increasing the size of Area"B"by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A"located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue S on the south side of SW Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and the accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes and readopt it by resolution. In addition a change is proposed in Section 9-12-11, Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A"and to clarify that a"master appraisa!"would only be required for those portions of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees are allowed. Location: This proposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development regulations that pertain to a one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west Seneca Avenue SE on the east. • Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, March 20, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 9805 . Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8- 11 B. Additional information re yarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)- 430-6510. If you have questions, please c II me t(425)430-6581. vironme evie ,Co it e, • Dona rickson Project Manager cc: King County Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Eric Swenson, Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom, Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (Ordinance) Joe Jainga, Puget SoLnd Energy agencyltr\ 1055 South� Grady Way-Renton,Washington 98055 GJ This caner contains 50%recycled material.20%cost consumer AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION • Charlotte Ann Kassens first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL 600 S. Washington Avenue,Kent,Washington 98032 a_daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal i newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL priorto the date ofpublication, referred to, printed andpublished in the English language DETER REVIEWN ENVIRONMENTAL 9 COMMITTEE continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County RENTON,WASHINGTON • The Environmental Review Committee Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the C (ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- , State of Washington for King County. F Significance for the following project under The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County the authority of the Renton_ Municipal Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers AUtlO MALL OVERLAY during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a ZONE AMENDMENTS LUA-00-007,ECF The City of Renton proposes changes in Auto Mall Overlay Zone Amendments the descriptions of Areas"A"and"B"of the Auto Mall.Location:This non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development as published on: 3/6/00 regulations that pertain to a one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$46.00, Way between Raymond Ave. SW on the g g west and Seneca Ave.SE on the east. charged to Acct. No. 8051067. Appeals of the environmental determina- tion must be filed in writing on or before 15:00 PM,March 20,2000.Appeals must be Legal Number 7274 ; filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,' 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11B. ega , outh my Journal Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)-430-6510. Subscribed and sworn before me on this 9 ay of NAL4, 2000 Published in the South County Journal �ovattttrrrrrprpo March 6,2000_7274 ___ _____, ..Z• `Zt' I ' -r,P?e Rr, ,�.`,.1r4\:' '... ...< m Ac; q, , ��'" a Notary Public of the State of Washington ® ,o Pc.1 t-' - : q residing in Renton ,.i•*—4, � King County, Washington ,�9j. •? 6 ft• ..Cr�00o1 eseeFo p LY art AS a9oo 00000 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON • • The Environmental Review Committee (ERG) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. , • AUTO MALL OVERLAY ZONE AMENDMENTS LUA-00-007,ECF • The City of Renton proposes changes in the descriptions of Areas"A" and "B" of the Auto Mall. Location: This non-project action affects the, Auto Mall overlay•development regulations that pertain to a one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Ave. SW on the west and Seneca Ave:SE on the east. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, March 20, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Rent*, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Ren on Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. Publication Date: March 6,2000 Account No. 51067 • dnspub ' II • : NoTim .. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION AUTO MALL OVERLAY ZONE AMENDMENTS LUA-00-007,ECF Non-project Action:Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area'A'and Area'Er of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Araa'A'and Increasing the size of Area'B'by changing the overlay designation on a ono and half • block area of Area'A'located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue Son the south side of SW Grady Way that Is currently zoned IM Zone.This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one end a half block area.Currently uses are limited to the sale,rental,and leasing of motor vehides and the accessory uses In this area.It Is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes and readopt It by resolution.In addition a change Is proposed In Section 9-12-11, Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations,Exemptions to reflect changes to Nen'A'and to clarify that a'master appraiser would only be required for those portions of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees are allowed.Location:This proposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development regulations that pertain to a one and half block area en the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west Seneca Avenue SE on the east. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERG)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.( Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed In writing en or baron 5:00 PM,March 20,2000. Appeals must be Mod In writing together with the required$75.00 application foe with:Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner aro govomod by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4.8.11B.Additional Informa0on regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office,(425)430.6510. 40 Olt ---ir ' " # ",,,,,,,T0). _ ,, 1_'1I-_ BpiF4V4211I!' I/�/ beau Gr% �ililL J I; r 7B x /r..r1L R . , El ., ie]j v tl / er�^ HOt y • f�.�IurI�isiI_► Air, nd Automall Improvement District f,,'<',Alrcctad Anna 9 �..® . ... �ff1 ArpD FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT(425)430-6581. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ' Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. CERTIFICATION ,4nd riz e. D- a LJ I, �� , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 2_ conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . yV 4zi 3, o 0 • Signed: a,.,,, , ..e...,/----- A T EST: Subcribed and sworn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the State of Washington residing i-A-,., , on the Ito day of )'7 iL6,ic jO d ft�t�,(i4LYAMCHEFF/ ` AR'� PUBLIC ,. 4 STATE OF WASHINGT®N MARILYN KP►MCHEFF COMMISSION EXPIRES MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 lE�ltlE 2 ,2003 � CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-00-00,ECF APPLICANT: City of Renton, EDNSP Dept. , PROJECT NAME: Auto Mall Overlay Zone Amendments DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Non-project Action: Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area "A" and Area "B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area "A" and increasing the size of Area "B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area "A" located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue S on the south side of SW Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and the accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes and readopt it by resolution. In addition a change is proposed in Section 9-12-11, Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A" and to clarify that a"master appraisal" would only be required for those portions of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees are allowed. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: This proposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development regulations that pertain to a one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west Seneca Avenue SE on the east. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen (14)days. Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, Monday, March 20, 2000. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Wayj Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. PUBLICATION DATE: March 6, 2000 DATE OF DECISION: February 29, 2000 , SIGNATURES: r Inii /(//��/���G��/' DATE l�i� O'0 egg rman, rfiarat�d"r" Departm t f PI ping/Building/Public Works 4il0ôC �nn S e herd, dmi ' trator D Comr n�unity Servic s Department /1/ ,./ t. ' 4/1 CWeeire Chief (--N`J DATE Renton Fire Department ercsignature • • STAFF 9ty of Renton REPORT Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE: February 29, 2000 Auto Mall Area A and Area B Modifications Project Name: • Applicant: City of Renton, EDNSP Dept. File,Number: LUA-00-007,.ECF Project Manager: Don Erickson Non-project Action: Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A"and Project Description: Area"B"of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A"and increasing the size of Area"B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A"located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue S on • the south side of SW Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and the accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes and readopt it by resolution. In addition a change is proposed in Section 9-12-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A"and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only be required for those portions of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees are allowed. Project Location: This proposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development regulations that pertain to a one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west Seneca Avenue SE on the east. • Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N.A. Proposed New Bldg.Area gsf N.A. Site Area N.A. Total Building Area gsf N.A. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-significance B. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials • make the following Environmental Determination: Automat!ERC Rprt.doc • City of Renton EDNSP Department - Enviro tal Review Committee Staff Report = AUTO MALL OVERLAY&MISC.AMENDMEirJ LUA-00-007,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF(INSERT DECISION DATE) Paget of 2 DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. X Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. ' " Issue DNS-M with 14 day Appeal Period. C. MITIGATION MEASURES This is a legislative non-project action. No environmental impacts were identified and no mitigation measures are proposed. Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. None are suggested for this non-project action D. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant'adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? No environmental impacts have been identified for this proposed non-project action. As a consequence no mitigation measures are proposed at this time nor a nexus provided. E. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable, these comments have been incorporated into the text of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. X Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. Environmental Determination Appeal Process Appeals of the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM, Monday, March 20, 2000 (14 days from the date of publication). Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 1055 South Grady Way, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-430-6510. • • Automall ERC Rprt.doc 4 . �� Sri ' - d PI,. . ' .� � � LI L I L k �� 1* off' „,„,,,,v;---r _ — / J -7- I iig kr 0 ,101111r,r lizik- Km HE 0• ....m Imo SW 4�' fr— .- gig m' _w Q =mi * ,' / __ __ _- —U- -I ivw..i.-. lm _=_-.=l.e, lr_f4 ,e`bQ� / __ -- __ In "un ■.�� -/ - - - ,ft „,. fee —, rer e v. -- _F__ __ W av sh- , ,,,..... s sc. /a IMO =7 // ' - LSto y V %. % % lIEW �r c � % 1/ i / 0 logror 3 r, ,fTrieWj/ a. Z:5 #1" i / St. l ♦ I � + f - orki �� I svi/ ..,*. � Map PI. 510 1116 ,11/ .., _ ®� ` ` ' ` 1.405' ' ' ' etairwrio ________---- li IN __. = _, Automall Improvement District Affected Area 0 700 1400 Area A • Neighborhoods StrategicPlanning {:::;:}}::::;:.:;:ti}: .I 6 Nagel V A��/ Area B 1:8400 City of RI rj Department of Planning/Building/Public cs ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: (- __. COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 23, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-007,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNSP Dept. PROJECT MANAGER: Donald Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Auto Mall Overlay Zone Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78640 LOCATION: Between Seneca Avenue South and Raymond Ave. So. Between 1-405 and South Grady Way SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Non-project action. Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area"B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A" and increasing the size of Area"B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A" located between Raymond Ave. So. And Seneca Ave. So. On the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes, if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11, Administrative Procedures for right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A", if approved, and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only be required for Area"A" since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet cl\o-ea no/ Opfibr B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Ree p'eIentative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of F.__ in Department of Planning/Building/Public' .i ks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:D p ,v_.PJIJCOMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 23, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-007,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 9,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNSP Dept. PROJECT MANAGER: Donald Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Auto Mall Overlay Zone Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78640 LOCATION: Between Seneca Avenue South and Raymond Ave.So. Between 1-405 and South Grady Way SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Non-project action. Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A"and Area"B"of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A"and increasing the size of Area"B"by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A"located between Raymond Ave.So.And Seneca Ave.So. On the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the salee, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed ' to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes,if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12- 11,Administrative Procedures for right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A", if approved, and to clarify that a "master appraisal"would only be required for Area"A"since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT( .g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info tion 's neeld t properly assess this proposal. . 2-77101/ §igna a of Di ctor r uthorized Repr sentative Date Rev.10/93 r City of Rernaii Department of Planning/Building/Public V ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: F COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 23, 2000 I APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-007,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNSQ Dept. PROJECT MANAGER: Donald Erickson PROJECT TITLE: Auto Mall Overlaly Zone Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78640 LOCATION: Between Seneca Avenue South and Raymond Ave. So. Between 1-405 and South Grady Way SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Non-project action. Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area"B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A" and increasing the size of Area"B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A" located between Raymond Ave. So. And Seneca Ave. So. On the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes, if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11, Administrative Procedures for right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A", if approved, and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only be required for Area"A" since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 4.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet __ 1 746 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS Ce/[X 'ICJ‘,(7r7/tC i?) 1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS aAA- 1//(),7(4,06 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a .itional information is ne ed to p ioperly assess this proposal. 02/76/ ^'gnature of Director or Au orized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 City of Re::..... Department of Planning/Building/Public b s ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:P\ -R ,LL,_ (,L) COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 23, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-007,EdF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNSI? Dept. PROJECT MANAGER: Donald Erickson '1-try OF RENTO' PROJECT TITLE: Auto Mall Overlay Zone Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78640 LOCATION: Between Seneca Avenue South and Raymond Ave. So. Between 1-405 and South Grady Way FEB 1 0 2000 SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A . SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Non-project action. Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area"B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A" and increasing the size of Area"B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A" located between Raymond Ave. So. And Seneca Ave. So. On the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes, if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11, Administrative Procpedures for right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A", if approved, and to clarify that a"master appraisal"Would only be required for Area"A" since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGla►e Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities _ Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENT 100 cowto44, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional i formati n is needed to I roperty assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 Ci y of Rea.__.: Department of Planning/Building/Public h_ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Tme_ pre, hc-1,-) COMMENTS DUE: FEBRU A = ( ]a a a I ' APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-007,EC= DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUA .� 20 `Vr E t 1'� L APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNSP Dept. PROJECT MANAGER: Donald t on PROJECT TITLE: Auto Mall OverlaJ Zone Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78640 _ FEB - 9 2000 ,J LOCATION: Between Seneca AvenJe South and Raymond Ave. So. Between 1-405 and South Gra'y Wav'. ENTON SITE AREA: N/A BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A CITY F RTMEN �9 ) FIRE DEPARTMENT SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Non-project action. Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area"B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A" and increasing the size of Area"B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A" located between Raymond Ave. So.And Seneca Ave. So. On the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes, if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11, Administrative Pro edures for right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A", if approved, and to clarify that a"master appraisal"w uld only be required for Area"A"since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(J.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS ' Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet SI B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS i AY- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS4.0M . . We have revie ed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio :1 information is n d to 1 ropedy assess this proposal. Signat - ��f Director or Authorized Re e'entative Date al/P/ed Routing Rev.10/93 City of Re, Department of Planning/Building/Public V ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:Sv. t.ce ( jaSµx� COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 23, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-007,EC= DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 9, 200,*rry of RENTOr APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNSF Dept. PROJECT MANAGER: Donald Erickson i'F'rr1V7rt, PROJECT TITLE: Auto Mall Overlay Zone Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78640 FEB 0 9 2000 LOCATION: Between Seneca AvenJe South and Raymond Ave. So. Between 1-405 and South Grady Wayy` i hLLIr14L9 U!V1,iOi`ki SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Non-plroject action. Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area"B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A" and increasing the size of Area"B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A" located between Raymond Ave. So. And Seneca Ave. So. On the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mpll Improvement Plan to reflect these changes, if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11,Administrative Procedures for right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A", if approved, and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only be required for Area"A" since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. , A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(el g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health I Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS f J 0 Gc)INI W1CW/ We have reviewed this application with palicular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. 21/4/0� Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 Ci y of Rel:__.. Department of Planning/Building/Public V._...3 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT.'— .spoVt (31/\ COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 23, 2000 APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-007,ECIF t DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNS9 Dept. PROJECT MANAGER: Donald Erickson ,,OF RENTOP f! PROJECT TITLE: Auto Mall Overlay) Zone Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78640 (� 9 Z®Q� LOCATION: Between Seneca Avenrle South and Raymond Ave. So. Between 1-405 and South Grady Way SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A �f�NYe�/C���a d�ltl�l� SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Non-project action. Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area"B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A" and increasing the size of Area"B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A" located between Raymond Ave. So. And Seneca Ave. So. On the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale! rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mull Improvement Plan to reflect these changes, if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11, Administrative Procedures for right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A", if approved, and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only be required for Area"A" since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(el g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS' ND C_OWMWi'M/( ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information to properly assess this proposal. / A)&jt Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • City of Re::..,:. Department of Planning/Building/Public ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET 7:n Y ut-RENTOIiN REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ch 1 ' AJ(Ce/J COMMENTS DUE: FEBRUARY 23, 2000-'7-""-'.pco APPLICATION NO: LUA-00-007,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 9, 2000 FEB ? 9 200G APPLICANT: City of Renton/EDNSF Dept. PROJECT MANAGER: Donald Erickson �''Q11N,Adreva.e c..a�'ISION PROJECT TITLE: Auto Mall Overla Zone Amendments WORK ORDER NO: 78640 LOCATION: Between Seneca AvenLie South and Raymond Ave. So. Between 1-405 and South Grady Way SITE AREA: N/A I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Non-lroject action. Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area"B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area"A" arid increasing the size of Area"B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A" located between Raymond Ave. So. And Seneca Ave. So. On the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale, rental, and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes, if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11, Administrative Procedures for right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A", if approved, and to clarify that a"master appraisal"Would only be required for Area"A" since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 4.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS M6 We have reviewed this application with p rticular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where addi;io al information is needed to pro erly assess this proposal. cf„_711/en AA Sig,"ture of Director Authorized Representative Date Routing Rev.10/93 • i fVY 0 �O� • • wNT 'NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE DATE: January 13,2000 • LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-007,ECF • • • APPLICATION NAME: Proposed Modifications to Area"A"and Area"B"of the Renton Auto Mall, the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan, and Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations , PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Non-project action: Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area "B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area "A" and increasing the size of Area "B" by changing the overlay • designation on a one and half block area.of Area"A"located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue S on the ' south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale,rental,'and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes,if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of- Way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A",if approved,and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only be required for Area"A"since it is the only Portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development regulations that pertain specifically to a one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west and Seneca Avenue SE on the east.• OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that.:. • significant environmental impacts are unlikely,to result from the proposed non-project action. Therefore;ae permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using,the Optional DNS process to give notice that.a,DNS is likely to be' issued: Comment periods for the'project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will • be no'comment period following the issuan e of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS arch. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 13,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 20,2000 • APPLICANT: City of Renton,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Division OWNER: Various • Permits/Review Requested: SEPA; Planning Commission Public Hearing and Recommendation;City Council Approval Other Permits which may be required: None • Requested Studies: None • Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission to be scheduled at a later • date. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY.OVERVIEW: .. - Analytical.Process Project consistency refers,to whether a ProjectIs,consistent with adopted.and,applicable:development:.;•• r • regulations,or in,:their absence;comprehensive.plan.policies. RCW-36.70.B.110•(2)(g)provides-that the Notice of Application(NOA)'include,a statementof•the-preliminary;determination of a project's,consistency with.the type;of land use,•Ievel•of development,'Infrastructure,and•character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall,Include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning, compre ens ve plan and developmentregulation ., POSTER2.rtf Land Use: No Ipecific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this 1 non-project application. The proposal is for minor amendments to RMC Section ' 4-3-040.b.1 and B.2 redesignating a block and half portion of Area"A"to Area "B",lupdating the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect this and other recent changes,and modifications in Section 9-14-11 pertaining to the area being app aised and streets designated for fee waivers when vacating street right-of- way�s in Area"A",will not alter uses allowed by underlying zoning. Density: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this no -project application Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: En ironmental checklist dated January 12,2000. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: As legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development reg lations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its IM . . zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development Regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc., Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: Not applicable for this non-project action. ' Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson,Project Manager,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 23,2000. This matter will be scheduled for a public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission at a later date. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the-Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Erickson at(425)430-6581. Anyone who submits written I comments will automatically become a part of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. ' CONTACT PERSON: Don Erickson(425)430-6581 IPLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION I eti StuII'..1- 14 r iii� = y 01OW 4- EC66 No= == C. - BEC■ J - 4' ;AB -� -' ■IG., ___,, 4Pk 111111‘.....41110— 0,e Rg _- __ =' n,sc. n7r umi _ /, A /�i _-� :Ws- , , IlliNa V/ 1 ii imillm 741pr / . ms 1 „ _ iiiLW0 1 j 5 / /// , i/ ;w4 .___C: vs icau. — t. ,,,- 0/4r A ii0... / i 'A .dr f r.A' Milli —\-S it\ AVIA"t' NG '5 \ Illin 1.11.1111111111MIIII sialk OW -- Automall Improvement Districts o - 700 1400 r::::::::: Area A ::.::::::.:.:.,.. lidgbbcdeakarmtglenis x : m 1:8400 Tr A Area B POSTER2.rtf • . p . CITY OF RENTON NA Planning/Building/Public Works - 1055 South GradyWay - Renton Washington = FEB 0 9'0 0 eI: ADDRESS 98055 = 0 ..� 0 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED 715840 i U.S. POSTAGE - - - PRS 'F MST-CLASS .SEA. VA 9%1 02 l t Q 100 001 3340404149,.,_. YI JAY+MI IKYL NG 503 SW 12TH AVE 98055 -u.._ . TO-� -- NOT DELIVER �AS ADDRESSED 6 3 A V UNABLE TO FORWARD �".m �' U,# is _, RETURN TO SENDER ` W� —: ._ ——- __ ' vas.. tit RUTO if,i„itii;iii,iii,i�,iiII, i,,aialiifl,,,frf,i,i„iil,,,f�,i .. I ru •Nr O • NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NONLSIGNIFICANCE DATE: January 13,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-00 ,ECF • APPLICATION NAME: Proposed odifications to Area"A"and Area"B"of the Renton Auto Mall, the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan, and Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Non-project action: Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area "B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area "A" and increasing the size of Area "B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area"A"located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue S on the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale,rental,and leasing of motor • vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes,if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of- Way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A",if approved,and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only be required for Area"A"since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development regulations that pertain specifically to a one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west and Seneca Avenue SE on the east. .. . 'OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: As the Lead Agency,the City of:Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the'proposed non-project action. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton islusing the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be 'issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will 'be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS March. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 13,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: 'January 20,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Division OWNER: 'Various f - Permits/Review Requested: (SEPA; Planning Commission.Public Hearing and Recommendation;City Council Approval Other Permits which may be required: None _f' Requested Studies: None Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public(hearing before the Renton Planning Commission to be scheduled at a later date. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical Process l Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable;development• , - - regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70.B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)Include.a statement of the preliminary'determination.of a project's.consistency.with-the type-of land use,level of development,infrastructure;and character of development'if one has been made at the time of notice..At a minimum,every NOA shall include•a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning, comprehensive plan and development regulations. POSTER2.rtf • Land Use: No specific del elopment projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. The proposal is for minor amendments to RMC Section 4-3-040.b.1 and B.2 redesignating a block and half portion of Area"A"to Area "B",updating the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect this and other recent changes,and modifications in Section 9-14-11 pertaining to the area being appraised and streets designated for fee waivers when vacating street right-of- ways in Are '"A",will not alter uses allowed by underlying zoning. Density: No specific evelopment projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environme tal checklist dated January 12,2000. Development Regulations • , Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development I regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its IM 1 zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations including)Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development Regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc., 1 Uniform i Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: Not applicable for this non-project action. Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson,Project Manager,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division,1055 South Grady A ay,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 23,2000. This matter will be scheduled for a public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission at a later date. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated abover you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the , proposal before the Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Erickson at(425)430-6581. Anyone who submits written I comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. ' CONTACT PERSON: Don Erickson(425)430-6581 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION __..d.iii y . It "Wall. -.1h.M. g EFI, DOM i I i ,41 Q‘w y V. i s M 6 11' ' Em J _/ ' - Ar 0 irsAnk iRssrA oigt =1" -F ,g0 =-, SF. g —RF U CIa,_=1: 1:1gMig i -:,C _ L -- ,..- L.- Difrifa ir- ..._. S7 Sc. n? r A /4)4 E_ r---- 1-= ir V r 1 2 .7,... x/4,,, , law r Jr v. 4 ZA14: A __ g a Ifiii _r-, A, i .., . i A 1 40 V 001 si17eg1' A 6� 'W1 1.405 - - I J1 .. =o E Automall Improverhent Districts o - �o0 1400 f:: : Area A .• air . ... � m• %A Area B 1:8400 POSTER2.rtf d o CITY OF RENTON ` A o �� -"—-� era :1 Planning/Building/Public Works qq ,.,®�, rt�Q 1055 South GradyWay - Rentonc3 FEB 0 9°0 0 * 0 5 Washington 98055 FILED 0 _ ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED RENTON MUNICIPAL COURT \ METER PR 8401 U.S. POSTAGE 00 FEB 14 Ali 11; 09 ..._,, Co (0 ) -4-- '5 '?i 4) 1 ct r 34040494505 > HILL DOUGLAS H 12033-RENTON S SEATTLE WA 98178 i/nl L`ELf t.kriAfiLE -a- F v _ -Y. .�- _ AS DRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD b ,—,- RETUflI TOR SEFdDER_ _ i9i': 9e►c10 spa:N 43Z1054 Ils;iiii!Ishii:ili{°iiiis,iiinilrtriii°iiitiiiiii:iii:iinii Y . I0 Ua i + .,u + 41� o • N NOTICE OF A' PLICATION AND PROPOSED ETERMINATION OF NON-SIG IFICANCE • DATE: January 13,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-007,ECF APPLICATION NAME: Proposed Modifica ions to Area"A"and Area"B"of the Renton Auto Mall, the 1996 Auto Mal Improvement Plan, and Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations • • PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Non-project action: Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area"A" and Area "B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area "A" and increasing the size of Area "B" by changing the overlay designation:on a one and half block area of Area"A"located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue S on the south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale,rental,and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes,if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of- Way Vacations,Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A",if approved,and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only be required for Area"A"since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. PROJECT LOCATION: - The proposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development regulations that pertain specifically to a one and half,block area on the south side of SW.Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west and Seneca Avenue SE on the east. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: As the Lead Agency,•the City of Renton'has determined that., significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed non-project action. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of the Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14-day appeal period willlfollow the issuance of the DNS March. • PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January1[3,2000 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 0,2000 APPLICANT: City of R nton,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Division OWNER: Various Permits/Review Requested: SEPA; Planning Commission Public Hearing and Recommendation;City Council Approval Other Permits which may be required: None ` Requested Studies: None Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission to be scheduled at a later date. All parties'of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical Process Project consistency refers to whether a project Is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. ,RCW 36.70.B.110(2)lg):provides,that the Notice-of Application(NOA)include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level,of development,Infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of notice. At a minimum,every NOA shall include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning,, comprehensive plan and development regulations..) POSTER2.rtf Land Use: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project application. The proposal is for minor amendments to RMC Section 4-3-040.b.1 and B.2 redesignating a block and half portion of Area"A"to Area "B",updating the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect this and other recent changes,and modifications in Section 9-14-11 pertaining to the area being appraised and streets designated for fee waivers when vacating street right-of- ways in Area"A",will not alter uses allowed by underlying zoning. Density: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-project appli tion Environmental Documents that - Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental the klist dated January 12,2000. _-_ - Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative pro osal,the amendments are not subject to development regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its IM zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations 1 including Renton's tSEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development Regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc., Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. _. . Proposed Mitigation Measures: Not applicable for this non-project action. _�.: Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson,Project Manager,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton, 98055,by 5:00 PM on February-23,2000. This matter . will be scheduled for a public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission at a later date. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record - and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Erickson at(425)430-6581. Anyone whosubmits written __ comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this_project. CONTACT PERSON: Don Erickson(425)430-658II1 PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION ' ISA( r -14 f:511 Nu C7." C .r* i Ar is"n V t __is - ' ■: - -- SE in '.-: . - f, IS011j Pr . igail E_ =R =n 1 _ om• C=_g-- NM ■ _ 7� � .41111P1 � ;tar. ==L mo& /_ S 7‘. (nr—1 /& E I- 5_, 7 IP Ag, _ 7..,. L ,// loop „or 0, yr P I ' 4 .4 __________!::.,____r—,. im totbst• 002.00).—sow:.: yr Ar „or eacirac.:. ilglor- 4r, maiwpr • 0010 Ice'a ;$ t,as 009 - L E Automall Improvement Districts 0 - 700 1400 ::::: :1 Area A A, tagheemmbas".eyeeknlos I ;,17.0 V gym. WM Area B . 1:8400 POSTER2.rtf • 0 e• CITY OF RENT ON Planning/Building/Public Works :,41 CAI B • :RA filt - 5 : 1055 South Grady Way - Renton Washington 98055 M ig FE 09'0 0 ammo 0 3 0- ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED te ,, . PB METES * mem U.S. POSTAGE '. : . .. -- .:'. :: 2:---.:: '-:";:---';:- '. TH- : ---:::::--:: -- 7:',.PRSIIT•F IRS1 '''CIASS •:SEA'VA.' 9.81 .02 Ilt MO 192305908407 RADOVICH JOHN C+CAROL D 2000 12TH AVE NE#B 103 BELLEVUE WA I • 98005 1AS ADDRESSED <,-,:. _ Gil ( u•• -'•-• 1.01ABLE TO FORWARD ' •- Jo ' Vid ' '' I RETURN TO SENDER ,,,, - • .,„ , „, , • I 1 list ill ill ! ti In i i i it li -,(' esers.ra,s/76s*.s'J !II, I III 111 i 11 1 I I 1 I 1 •II I 1 II I I I I LIM, I • • __________ M .................................................... >::;::::>::>::>:<:>;::>::>:.::::::»:: :<:»::>::;::>::::»:::»::>:::<:>:::::>::>.:::>::: E .:....LOPMENT..S.ERVI.CES.:.DIViSION ......... . ........... . .:...:.:::.:::..:::::::::::::: T SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS S PROJECT NAME: LUA•OO OUT , EL4 III APPLICATION NO: -�c.A.19 The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER . s sdiv (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) M (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • • NUMBER Applicant Certification , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: 0 City of Renton Technical Services Records 0 Title Company Records D King County Assessors Records Signed Date (Applicant) • NOTARY ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at on the day of , 19 Signed (Notary Public) For.Citv..of Renton.Use:<:: ...... ::::SlAlt O0F:;::W ;� GTQI�.. CY herei y cerrif' that<:notices of the proposed.:a : ti iF{6E�� 8�.1� �-� 2�a Ci ;Em to ee : .. .::.:.;.::.:.:. ` `on 'esidin.; .::;....... listprop.doc REV 07/98 MARILYN KAMCHEFF MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 2 Smooth'Feed Sheets1M411. SO Use template for 5160® 334040492509 334040480504 334040490008 BALA EARLINE M BUCK DOUGLAS M BUCK DOUGLAS M+CLAUDIA J 3121 SE 5TH j 627 SW 12TH PO BOX 28 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98057 334040422506 334040662507 334040421508 CLEMENTS GENERAL CONSTRUCTI CUMMINS NORTHWEST INC GAIDJIERGIS JEFF J+LAURIE K C/O GOOD CHEVROLET INC 811 SW GRADY WAY 2447 MAPLE VALLEY HWY PO BOX 935 RENTON WA 98055 RENTON WA 98056 RENTON WA 98057 334040489000 334040459003 334040484506 GELVEZON HERNANI C+NANETTE GOTTI MARGUERITE HERTZ LEO 1876 RANCHO HILLS 1718 HILLTOP RD NW 608 SW 12TH ST CHINO HILLS CA 91709 GIG HARBOR WA 98335 RENTON WA 98055 334040426507 1 334040494505 334040519103 HESS JAMES A+CAROL M HILL DOUGLAS H HOLMES MICHAEL J+KARA H 968 ANACORTES CT NE 1 12033 RENTON S 23 VASHON KEY RENTON WA 98059 SEATTLE WA 98178 BELLEVUE WA 98006 334040514005 334040403001 334040478508 HOLRIC COMPANY HUNT FLOYD R+DOREEN J JOHNSON JEFFERY L+LINDA D PO BOX 179 . 18122 40TH AVE S E 1406 WOODCLIFF RENTON WA 98057 SEATTLE WA 98188 SPOKANE WA 99203 192305908704 334040425509 334040473004 JOHNSON-LIEBER INC JOHNSTON GEORGE+NANCY LANPHERE ENTERPRISES OF WA 723 SW 10TH ST PO BOX 9723 820 W LK SAMAMMISH PKWY N PO BOX 4040 RENTON WA 98057 BELLEVUE WA 98008 RENTON WA 98052 334040496005 334040643002 . 334040403506 MCLAUGHLIN PROPERTIES L L C MSI 800-SW 16TH LLC POWERS JR FRANK J&JOHN H • P 0 BOX 60106 1109 FIRST AVE#500 PO BOX 508 RENTON WA 98058 SEATTLE WA 98101 RENTON WA 98055 242304911306 192305908407 334040470505 PUGET SOUND ENERGY/ELEC RADOVICH JOHN C+CAROL D RENTON WEST 1NC • PROPERTY TAX DEPT . . 2000 12TH AVE NE#B 103 607 SW GRADY WAY STE 200 PO BOX 90868 BELLEVUE WA 98005 RENTON WA 98055 BELLEVUE WA 98009 334040500509 334040499504 334040486501 SANDOR THOMAS R ' SPINNAKER INVESTMENT STOTTS LOUIE K SANDOR VERA M 2407 GARDEN CT N 210 37TH ST SE#81 600 SW 13TH RENTON WA 98056 AUBURN WA 98002 RENTON WA 98055 t 242304902503 . 334040447008 334040491501 SYSTEMS CONTROL INC TIMELESS HOLDINGS PARTNERSH WASHBURN CHARLES A 8656 154TH AVE NE PO BOX 273 703 SW 12TH ST REDMOND WA 98052 ISSAQUAH WA 98027 RENTON WA 98055 EN3119}OrrtarM Aririr, s,, I - .-,I - o ...-..,. rir_r A Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template I 334040497003 334040414909 WASHBURN CHARLES YI JAY+MI KYUNG 11017 RAINIER AVE S 503 SW 12TH AVE SEATTLE WA 98178 RENTON WA 98055 • 0� ®vFPV. Address Labels Laser * '-: MetroScan / King - , .^ Owner :Bala Earline M Pai,,,..1 # :334040 4925 Site :711 SW 12Th St Rent n 98055 Sale Date:06/15/1984 Mail :3121 'SE 5Th St Rent n Wa 98058 Sale Price . Use:101 Res,Single Family esidence Asd.V :$75, 000 Lgl:BLK 29 LOT 13 THRU 16 ILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R: ' Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 B1dgSF:670 Ac: .28YB:1945h: * MetroScan / King . Owner :Hill Douglas H Parcel # :334040 4945 Site :710 SW 13Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date: ' Mail :12033 Renton Ave S Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price . ' Use:931 Vacant,Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$38,900 Lgl:BLK 29 LOT 17-18 HILLM NS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R: Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .14YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King Owner :Mclaughlin Propertigs Llc Parcel # :334040 4960 Site :708 SW 13Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date:12/31/1996 Mail :PO Box 60106 Renton Wa 98058 Sale Price . Use:261 Off,l-3 Story,Less Than 5K Sqft Asd.V :$266,800 Lg1:BLK 29 LOT 19-20-21 HILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R: Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:4,880 Ac: .19YB:1985h: * MetroScan / King . Owner :Washburn Charles Parcel # :334040 4970 Site :700 SW 13Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date:06/05/1992 Mail :11017 Rainier Ave S1,Seattle Wa 98178 Sale Price : Use:931 Vacant,Industrial, ess Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$87,500 ' Lgl:BLK 29 LOT 22 THRU 26 HILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R: Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .33YB: Ph:206-772-2550 * MetroScan / King Owner :Spinnaker Investment Parcel # :334040 4995 Site :616 SW 13Th St Rentpn 98055 Sale Date: Mail :2407 Garden Ct N Rennton Wa 98056 Sale Price . Use:931 Vacant,Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$35,000 Lgl:BLK 29 LOT 27-28 HILL S Q:NW S:19 T:23N R: Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .13YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King Owner :Sandor Thomas R Parcel # :334040 5005 Site :600 SW 13Th St, Renton 98055 Sale Date:07/31/1986 Mail :600 SW 13Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$200,000 Use:108 Res,Single Family Residence,Comm Us Asd.V :$163,100 Lgl:BLK 29 LOT 29 THRU 32 IILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R: Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:2,800 Ac: .27YB:1979h: * MetroScan / King Owner :Sandor Thomas R Parcel # :334040 5025 Site :600 SW 13Th St Rent n 98055 Sale Date:07/31/1986 ' Mail :600 SW 13Th St Rentpn Wa 98055 Sale Price :$200, 000 ' Use:931 Vacant,Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$5, 000 Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 1-2 HILLMANS EARLINGTON Q:NW S:19 T:23N R: Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .05YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King Owner :Sandor Thomas R Parcel # :334040 5035 Site :600 SW 13Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date:07/31/1986 Mail :600 SW 13Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$200,000 Use:931 Vacant,Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$5, 000 Lgl:BLK 30 LOT 3 THRU 11 HILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R: Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .06YB: Ph: The Information Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. * • MetroScan / King -- Owner :Johnson Jeffrey L/Linda D Parc.-- # :334040 4785 Site :1150 Raymond Ave SW Renton 98055 Sale Date:08/10/1994 Mail :1406 E Woodcliff Rd Spokane Wa 99203 Sale Price :$425, 000 Ful: Use:502 Ind,Warehouse,2K To 10K Sqft Asd.V :$373,500 Lgl:BLK 28 LOT 17-18-19-20 HILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:6,720 Ac: .28YB:1979h:509-533-1080 * MetroScan / King . Owner :Buck Douglas M Parcel # :334040 4805 Site :620 SW 12Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date:05/14/1997 Mail :627 SW 12Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$110, 000 Ful: Use:931 Vacant, Industrial,Less Than 1 Acre Asd.V :$87, 000 Lgl:BLK 28 LOT 21 THRU 25 kILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac: .33YB: Ph: * MetroScan / King Owner :Hertz Leo Parcel # :334040 4845 Site :608 SW 12Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date: Mail :608 SW 12Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use:101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$74,100 Lg1:BLK 28 LOT 29-30 HILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / IStories:l B1dgSF:810 Ac: .13YB:1942h:206-228-5473 * 1 MetroScan / King : Owner :Hertz Leo Parcel # :334040 4855 Site :*No Site Address* Renton Sale Date: Mail :608 SW 12Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . Use:901 Vacant,Residential Asd.V :$42, 900 Lgl:BLK 28 LOT 31-32 HILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: B1dgSF: Ac: .14YB: Ph:206-228-5473 * MetroScan / King . Owner :Stotts Louie K Parcel # :334040 4865 Site :603 SW 12Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date: Mail :210 37Th St SE #81 4uburn Wa 98002 Sale Price . Use:101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$78, 000 Lg1:BLK 29 LOT 1 HILLMANS EARLINGTON Q:NW S:19 T:23N R Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:720 Ac: .08YB:1943h: * MetroScan / King Owner :Sandor Thomas R & Vera M Parcel # :334040 4870 Site :611 SW 12Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date:01/26/1987 Mail :600 SW 13Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$47,000 Use:101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$70, 000 Lg1:BLK 29 LOT 2-3-4-5 HILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R; Bedrm:l Bth F3H:1/ / jStories:1 B1dgSF:770 Ac: .26YB:1942h: * MetroScan / King : Owner :Autohut Corporation Parcel # :334040 4890 Site :619 SW 12Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date:09/17/1999 Mail Sale Price . Use:101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$35, 000 Lg1:BLK 29 LOT 6-7 HILLMANS EARLINGTON Q:NW S:19 T:23N R Bedrm:l Bth F3H: /1 / jStories:1 BldgSF:690 Ac: .13YB:1951h: * MetroScan / King I • Owner :Buck Douglas M/Claudia J Parcel # :334040 4900 Site :627 SW 12Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date:11/01/1994 Mail :PO Box 28 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price :$87, 000 Full Use:101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$81, 000 Lg1:BLK 29 LOT 8-9-10 HILLMANS Q:NW S:19 T:23N R Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / jStories:1 B1dgSF:700 Ac: .19YB:1947h: * MetroScan / King : Owner :Washburn Charles A Parcel # :334040 4915 Site :703 SW 12Th St Renton 98055 Sale Date:04/30/1997 Mail :703 SW 12Th St Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price :$69,000 Full Use:101 Res,Single Family Residence Asd.V :$82, 000 Lgl:BLK 29 LOT 11-12 HILL S Q:NW S:19 T:23N R Bedrm:2 Bth F3H:1/ / Stories:1 BldgSF:940 Ac: .13YB:1918h:425-255-2055 The Inform tion Provided Is Deemed Reliable, But Is Not Guaranteed. Land Use: No sped4 pment projects will be processed or reviewed as pa V��YQ 0� non-project Baton.The proposal Is far minor amendments to Ft AP 4-3-040.12.1 and B2 redesignating a block and half portion of Area'A ♦ B',updating he 1998 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to refect this and recent changes,and modifications bt Section 9-t411 pertaining to th ,,A apprai;Tea ed and streets designated fur fee waivers when vacating stret r' NrrO� ways in Area'A,unit not alter uses allowed by underlying zoning. NOTICE OF APPLICATION Density: No specific development projects will be processed or reviewed as p non--project application AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION Environmental Documents that •OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Evaluate the Proposed Project: Environmental checklist dated January 12,2000. • • Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to develot regulations.Future development that may occur in the affected area DATE: January 13,20a0 zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental re Including Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Developmen LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-007,ECF addressing zoning,environmental regulations,Infrastructure standar Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable APPLICATION NAME: Proposed Modification.to Area"A'and Area"B"of the Renton Auto Mall, Proposed MItIgatIon Measures: Not applicable for this non-project action.the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Pan,and Administrative Procedures for Rightof•Way Vacations i' Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Don Erickson,Project Manager,Neighb Strategic Planning Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 23,2000. will be scheduled for a public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission at a later dale.If comments c PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Non-project action: Changes are proposed In the descriptions of Area'A"and • submitted In Writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comma • Area B'of the Auto-Mall reducing the size of Area'A'and Increasing the'size of Area'B'by changing the overlay proposal before the Planning Commission.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a F designation on a one and half block area of Area'A'located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue Son the and receive additional information by mall,contact Mr.Erickson at(425)430-6581.Anyone who submits web south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed In order to allow a broader comments w ll automatically become a party of record and will he notified of any decision on This project array of land uses within this one and a half block area.Currently uses are limited to the sale,rental,and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to CONTACT PERSON: Don Erickson(425)430-6581 reflect these changes,if approved.A final change Is proposed to Section 9-12.11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of- Way Vacations,Exemptions to reflect changes to Area'A',if approved,and In lanty that a'master appraisal"would only I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICI be required for Area'A'since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development regulations that pertain specifically toe one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west and Seneca Avenue SE on the east. .• -. . . • - OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE:.As the Lead Agency the City of Renton has determined that, r(r \� � J ,U--F significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed non-project action.Therefore,as permitted 1 .r r6�J under the RCW 4321C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be • M I I Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are integrated Into a single comment period.There will • �,l�� A`!- �= �+ - be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determination of Won-Significance(DNS).A 14-dayappeal U a Asa- be NM 7 i F Egg: = period will follow the Issuance of the DNS March. g ( ) PF JW f�G �—; .111 �. . , r�a,e1(Js,• _ It • ® ®PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 13,2000 _ , NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 20,2000 /t APPLICANT: City of Renton,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Division _ F7 sr. �( 1 %j��� •®®imLtS®/j\� OWNER: Various ',_� u VpIlr Permits/Review Requested: SEPA;Planning Commission Public Hearing and Recommendation;City ,- Fd4Ai-4 Cone Approval I /,/ /Other Permits which maybe required: None i' — jRequested Studies: None f4 tgyA /,��,r10,4' �•Location where application may u 010be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, -�" /�j Ht od j ' 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 //���i00pd /. n :::•: PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission to be scheduled at a later :rprr 6a101::::;:• Hat date.All parties of record will receive notification. / CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: - '- Analytical Process 'Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development - regulations,or In their absence,comprehensive plan policies.RCW 36.701.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Automall Improvement Districts Application(NOA)Include a statement of the preliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of RsamArca A land use,level of development,Infrastructure,and character of development if one has been made at the time of •`...n.• Area B 1:840 notice.At a minimum,every NOA shalt Include a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning, ®=•� comprehensive plan and development regulations. • POSTER2nr . POSTER2.rd CERTIFICATION I, / .>i , hereby certify that O 5 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby • the described property on . 2- 9- 0 o . Signed: OZ �� Al"PEST: Subcribed and sworn before me i rY a Norte Public, in and for a of Washington residing m - )� s( g, ,- , on the I i- fi re t- day of _' . _ J' .- - fVIls,Fal... r 4 IiireCHEFF - NOTARY PUBLIC • r STATE OF 1u�lHSHINGTON � " COMF�ISSfr E) PIRES MARILYN MCHEFF -' rl 4-29, 3 MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 I es am, 01111 NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE DATE: January 13,2000 LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-007,ECF 'APPLICATION NAME: Proposed Modifications to Area"A"and Area"B"of the Renton Auto Mall, the 1966 Auto Mall Improvement Plan, and Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations 'PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Non-prc'ect action: Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area "A" and Area "B" of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area "A" and increasing the size of Area "B" by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Are "A"located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue S on the south side of Grady Way that is currently zone IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader array of land uses within this one and a half block area. Currently uses are limited to the sale,rental,and leasing of motor vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect these changes,if approved. A final change is proposed to Section 9-12-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of- l4 Way Vacations, Exemptions to reflect changes to Area"A",if approved,and to clarify that a"master appraisal"would only S '` be required for Area"A"since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to street vacation fees is allowed. PROJECT LOCATION: The prcposed non-project action affects the Auto Mall overlay development 2I9 regulations that pertain specifically to a one and half block area on the south side of SW Grady Way between Raymond Avenue SW on the west and Seneca Avenue SE on the east. OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE:'As the Lead Agency,the City of Renton has determined that significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from the proposed non-project action. Therefore,as permitted under the RCW 43.21 C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS process to give notice that a DNS is likely to be issued. Comment periods for the project and the(proposed DNS are integrated into a single comment period. There will be no comment period following the issuance of tie Threshold Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). A 14-day appeal period will follow the issuance of the DNS March. PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: �anuary 13,2000 - NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 20,2000 APPLICANT: City of Renton,Neighborhoods&Strategic Planning Division OWNER: Various Permits/Review Requested: SEPA; Planning Commission Public Hearing and Recommendation;City Council Approval Other Permits which may be required: None Requested Studies: None Location where application may be reviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Division,Development Services Department, 1055 SoYI th Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission to be scheduled at a later date. All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Analytical Process Project consistency refers to whether a project is consistent with adopted and applicable development regulations,or in their absence,comprehensive plan policies. RCW 36.70.B.110(2)(g)provides that the Notice of Application(NOA)include a statement of the p eliminary determination of a project's consistency with the type of land use,level of development,infrastructure, nd character of development if one has been made at the time of notice..At a minimum,every NOA shall includ a determination of the project's consistency with the zoning, comprehensive plan and development regulations. POSTER2.rtf • Land Use: No spe ific dE Iment projects will be processed or reviewed as part is 1 .. non-pr ject al Lion. The proposal is for minor amendments to RM( tion 4-3-04 .b.1 and B.2 redesignating a block and half portion of Area"A"to Area "B",updating the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to reflect this and other recent ohanges,and modifications in Section 9-14-11 pertaining to the area being appraised and streets designated for fee waivers when vacating street right-of- ways ini Area"A",will not alter uses allowed by underlying zoning. I Density: No spe ific development projects will be processed or reviewed as part of this non-pr ject application Environmental Documents that Evaluate the Proposed Project: Enviro mental checklist dated January 12,2000. Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to development regulations. Future development that may occur in the affected area under its IM zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environmental regulations includirjg Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Development Regulations addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure standards,etc., Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applicable regulations. Proposed Mitigation Measures: Not applicable for this non-project action. • ,Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson,Project Manager,Neighborhoods and Strategic Planning Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on February 23,2000. This matter , . i will be scheduled for a public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission at a later date. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Planning Commission. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contaet Mr.Erickson at(425)430-6581. Anyone who submits written • comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. CONTACT PERSON: Don Erickson(425)430-6581 `PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION , I 01 V7d P 1, .I 1 r.4 q 0 2 =-_- '1 0)-11',7 c Witiiti ,f/P4 Zts,- 4 r _ _a---: '1-- la j mill _ ri th. g.- .. 1 im, v - 7.7 Ntl. L-L_LI I- 00,1111..= == .-- 04_- _____- IL,.-E -7,, ---j ill ti, -04111011 d Eli 1E-E_ --7; °Ibn I 9I ftk .• — , ER igi R ANN —. —= —I ____,... ..... 411110111 _, E. 7 iii i g S 7+�St r , / — ,t- ing. or., _ A.:. -.-- a gl a Q' , (Ik 5JIJ �� - e II 4,641 .. . � 1 ". PO4.1° 0115 Caglonsol ., Alit'l hi Itl��i A . J E ► , Automall Improvement Districts 0 700 1400 •:: Area A rows �Qs� mo % A Area B 1:8400 :POSTER2.rtf • i Q 0 Environmental Documents that Evaluate tho Proposed Project: En', sal checklist dated January 12.2000. + Development Regulations Used For Project Mitigation: As a legislative proposal,the amendments are not subject to der "�•eivrtp� regulations.Future development that may occur In the affected a r zoning would be subject to site-specific review and environments REVISED NOTICE OF APPLICATION inctuding Renton's SEPA Ordinance,as well as Title IV Developn addressing zoning,environmental regulations,infrastructure stan AND PROPOSED DETERMINATION OF Uniform Building Code,Uniform Fire Code,and any other applia Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Don Erickson,Project Manager,Nelgl N O N S I G N I F I CAN C E • Strategic Planning Division,1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055.by 5:00 PM onFebmary 3rd,200 comment period;14 calendar days from date of notice if no ERC;30 days from date of notice for shoreline matter will be scheduled fora public hearing before the Renton Planning Commission at a later date.If cc be submitted in writing by the date indicated above.you may still appear at the hearing and present your c proposal before the Planning Commission.If you have questions about this proposal.or wish to be made DATE: January 21,2000 and receive additional information by mail,contact Mr.Erickson at(425)430-6581.Anyone who submits comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project LAND USE NUMBER: LUA-00-007,ECF • CONTACT PERSON: Don Erickson(425)430.6581 APPLICATION NAME: Proposed Modifications to Area"A"and Area"B"of the Renton Auto Mall, the 1996 Auto Malt Improvement Plan,and Administrative Procedures for I PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIF Right-of-Way Vacations ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Non-project action: Changes are proposed in the descriptions of Area'A'and, — Area'B'of the Auto Mall reducing the size of Area'A'and increasing the size of Area"B'by changing the overlay designation on a one and half block area of Area'A'located between Raymond Avenue S and Seneca Avenue Son the _ south side of Grady Way that is currently zoned IM Zone. This specific change is proposed in order to allow a broader S eth kPC= array of land uses within this one and a half block area.Currently uses are limited to the sale,rental,and leasing of motor • vehicles and their accessory uses in this area. It is also proposed to update the 1996 Auto Mall Improvement Plan to ' .� I reflect these changes,if approved.A final change is proposed to Section 9-12.11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of- Way Vacations,Exemptions to reflect changes to Area'A',if approved,and to clarify that a'master appraisal'would only U ` �/�,U• G I be required for Area'A'since it is the only portion of the Auto Mall where exemptions to sheet vacation fees is allowed. �— C PROJECT LOCATION: The dproposedlfb non—project etion haffectse hS AutoG Mall overlay development '�PSy -�9 , regulations that pertain specifically to a one and half block area on the scum side of SW Grady Way between Raymond , ' Avenue SW on the west end Seneca Avenue SE on the east. ' OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE:As the Lead Age cy,the Ciy of Renton has determined that ..,.. significant environmental impacts are unlikely to result from • the proposed nopi-project action.Therefore,as permitted �.R. under the RCW 4321C.110,the City of Renton is using the Optional DNS p cess to give notice that a DNS is likely to be !:� Issued.Comment periods for the project and the proposed DNS are Integra ed Into a single comment period.There will be no comment period following the Issuance of the Threshold Determinatioi of Non-Significance(DNS).A 14-day appeal' al period will follow the issuance of the DNS March. 7 St. _ /„/ PERMIT APPLICATION DATE: January 13,2000 III ,74KNOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 21,2000 Q 4 APPLICANT:• City of Renton,Neighborhoods 8 Strategic Planning Division - a, . - a Nt l MI Elp �/% OWNER: Various Ac i — ■ %�/Permits/Review Requested: SEPA:Planning Commission Public Hearingand Recommendation; �%/ City ��/'�l� / .. Council Approval I Syjl9th St A00.:T�'�jl// Other Permits which may be required: None �,,,v 54 �j�A `y', Requested Studies: None '/i�����%' } Location where application may :;.';n r— hereviewed: Planning/Building/Public Works Divyision,Development Services Department, giieWSK< •• 1055 South Grady Way,Renton,WA 98055 6hW°s PUBLIC HEARING: Public hearing before the Renton planning Commission to be scheduled at a later date.All parties of record will receive notification. CONSISTENCY OVERVIEW: Land Use: No specific development projects rill be processed or reviewed as part of this Automall Improvement District ict u4»'f non-project application.The proposal is for minor amendments to RMC Section 4.3-040.b.1 and B.2 redesignating a block and half portion of Area'A'to •Area - [:•:•:•:•:I Area'B',updating the 1996 Auto Mall linprovement Plan to reflect this and other ©.",, Web.*•se.nk. ..+.r recent changes,and modifications in Section 9.14-11 pertaining to the area being Q )).gym �j/� Area appraised and streets designated for fee waivers when vacating sheet rightof- ways in Area'A',will not alter uses allowed by underlying zoning. POSTER2.rd ,/• POSTER2af /'; CERTIFICATION �__ _ - I, ereby certify that S copies of the above document were posted by mei .. conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . Signed: ATTEST: Subcribed andorn before me, a Nortary Public,in and for the State f Washington residing in IQlitI N, , on the 2kstl- day of I mo, . .Do a . • ` (�jj-y z4.. �iQ�IGrF `'/ice MARILYN NOTARY PUBLIC MARILYN KAMCHEFF1 STATE OF WASHINGTON MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES:6-29-03 COMMISSION EXPIRES • JUNS 29, 2003 / .. . :.....:.....:.........:: ::.......::....:: :......I :.................. ��.�ei�i:�F.�. 'I�� %'Syr` ? ? `•? t�y i� ��y� E.y. ..y i �i ::: .... :::::.:..::::::.:.::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::':::::: MAS .P ::::::r P ..I .... T . ►.. . .................... .... ��/��(..y.. K� >::»ililii:<:»»>:::<::::>::;:>:»:<::»>::>:««:>:>: . :;<;« .;::.;:.;.:: -w:-I;;::::fi�rr:;::>;:R�;»:;/•:�''�:(.;I ID EA Notel,:ii >there::o:t0..e::than;one Iega#oWnet WO:#6.e.attach n additiotiiSii natanzed:Mestec Application:(`atAackoWnec.....: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: /J /e.. ihY6 ile/&fir/lyPliez`ANAME: %J /i? • V ��j/� PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): I TELEPHONE NUMBER: EXISTING LAND USE(S): , f/hhid✓/ /HOLD dii 'ld' &';iffA ::>::>:.:.:.:><<:::>::>:10PLLG,�4N :>aisf.Wtheriti.:an<iivitn...:r}.:::::::::::..:::::::.. NAME: 21/1)5P Zei Gfr- PROPOSED LAND USES: City d -Orn Ohio /# 17-1/ ‘/v; COMPANY (if applicable): 1 W4 ,LJ EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION I ' g-/1--/g,%7///0 0 1/4 a-- -- a ADDRESS: /, S d,,,i, PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATIO I 0 (� CITY: /// �/ ��\ ZIP: fora EXISTING ZONING: amTELEPHO NUMBER: ,0,16/�Q 4,,,4/1- �� /C!��� ✓�� PROPOSED�NING ifap licable): Gt/ (;f�� 1����rr�, -- vas :25!:!:;:::::•:::1iili!i!!!!ii!!!!!1!!!!!!INIIICON;.T.A.617i:ireqpp.Nympigiilili:p.i.li!!!!",:i.11•Iliv:im /q/-ed",13 '' ookle#- SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE):NAME: C/ o�A/T Van - /> � 5� REP COMPANY (i applicable): E)/U5 ' 0/0/ PROJECT VALUE: RE u 2' di-r, , ,.‘--7257- ,,,, 0V ��j ADDRESS: JO �.--7 /� /',,, IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION / �!/v lip�/ I V O CITY: 7y ZIP: 7cfez5 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIR SENSITIVE AREA? TELEPHONE N BER: A 1 »::::><::»>::>::>:::LEGAL..D€ . .1 0:..........:..tR:........00............0...::::.:.:.:...:..................... (4. ////7/ /7/irrif 14i\g . • '1'1 ':1::,i:•i::f4:r::::::::it::':2:::::L:::::iiii::::::isi ssj::::::::::::j::v+:::S:iti>'v::j<:;'.::{{:f}::::j::;:<isj:::::::::C:;`.+}}::::i:Si::j"}::::: apply--City ff>w ll rmine f : >:::>>:>>:€:>:::>:>€:€::>::>:>::<::: >:::>:::>:: XATION $ SUBDIVISION: D. PLAN AMENDMENT $ NE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ IAL PERMIT $ _ SHORT PLAT $ 'ORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ )ITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ PLAN APPROVAL $ _ FINAL PLAT $ )E & FILL PERMIT $ • NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ ONCE $ FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY 'ER $ FINAL AND PERMIT $ 'INE VEGETATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ IAGEMENT PERMIT $ NG SITE PLAN $ INE REVIEWS: TANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ )ITIONAL USE $ ONCE $ • IPTION $No Charge ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ _ ;ION • $ A CIT>OF OWN me) ,declare that I am (please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,_the representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. t. (I�+r ` pi 0410 ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public,in and (lam �� for the State of residing at r/ sent•five) r , on the_day of / .. i/i ` re of Owne /Represe ative) (Signature of Notary Public) ;:.:;: »:>::S..'::• �: SA;f� . SHP .A...<SHP ........... P..... I�/[..... .I�!)»...... �...... '`A >:>1(`'I�>'<:..:<:`H......:::::...,::::..:..:.:.::::...::::::::::::::::::::::....:,:...,:.....:........................................................ .DOC REVISED 8/97 4-3-040 AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT REGULATIONS: A PURPOSE: These regulations are intended to help create a regional auto mall that has a cohesive appearance for improved retail activity. B APPLICABILITY: 1. Auto Mall Area A: That area bounded by Grady Way S. on the north, Rainier Avenue S. (SR-167) n the east, 1-405 on the south, and Raymond-Seneca Avenue S. on the west, and That area bound d SW Grady Way on the north, Raymond Avenue SW on the west, Seneca Avenu6 SW on the east, and the alley midway between SW Grady and SW 12th Street, on tie south. 2. Auto Mall Area B: That area along the south side of SW Grady defined by the alley between SW Grady Way and SW 12th Street, on the north. Seneca Avenue SW on the east, and Raymond Avenue SW on the west; That area along the south side of S.W. Grady Way west of Raymond Avenue S. between S.W. Grady Way on the north, Raymond Avenue S. on the east, a north/south line approximately foir hundred feet(400') east of Raymond Avenue S.W. on the west, and S.W. Grady WaY Wayon the north; That area along the north side of S.W. Grady Way west of Lind Avenue S. bounded by S.W. Grady Way on the south, Powell Avenue S.W. on the west, S.W. 10th Street on the Iorth, and Lind Avenue S.W. on the east;gkhe That area alon north side of S.W. GradyWaybetween Lind Avenue to the west and Rainier Avenue S. on the east. Beginning at a point approximately four hundred feet(400')north of S.W. Grady Way along the east side of Lind Avenue S.W. on the west,t len east for a distance of approximately three hundred twenty five feet(325'), then south to a point approximately one hundred eighty feet(180') north of S.W. Grady Way, then east from this point parallel to S.W. Grady Way to a point approximately ninety feet(90')west of Rainier Avenue S., then north from this point approximately sixty feet(60'),then west approximately fifty feet(50'), and then north approximately two hundred fifteen feet(215') and then east approximately one hundred sixty feet(160')to Rainier Avenue S. on the east; That area north pf South 7th Street and west of Hardie Avenue generally described as the area beginning at the northwest corner of South 7th Street and Hardie Avenue S. and then proceeding west approximately four hundred twenty five feet(425'), then north approximately four hundred fifty feet(450')to the southern edge of thie Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way, then east along the railroad ROW approximately two hundred thirty five feet(235')to Hardie Avenue and then south along Hardie Avenue to the beginning point; That area north pf South 7th Street between Hardie Avenue on the west,the Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way on the north, and Rainier Avenue on the east; ©1998 Code Publishino Inc. Pate 1 That area north f South 7th Street between Rainier Avenue S. on the west, a line approximately one hundred ninety feet (190') north of and parallel to South 7th Street on the north, and Shattuck Avenue S. on the east; The triangular area on the south side of South 7th Street between Hardie Avenue on the west and Rainier Avenue on the east; The larger area north of S. Grady Way between Rainier Avenue on the west and Shattuck Avenue S. on the east between South 7th Street on the north and S. Grady Way on the south; That area north of S. Grady Way between Shattuck Avenue S. on the west, the northern edge of the former railroad right-of-way approximately one hundred fifty feet(150') north of S. Grady Way, and Talbot Road/Smithers Avenue S. on the east; That area along the south side of S. Grady Way between SR-167/Rainier Avenue S. on the west and a north/south line approximately one thousand six hundred thirty feet(1,630')east of SR-167 on the east, S. Grady Way on the north, and on the southwest along S. Renton Village Place approximately one hundred seventy five feet (175') to the 1998 zoning boundary between the CA Zone and the CO Zone on the south; and That area along Ithe south side of S. Grady Way east of Talbot Road bounded by Talbot Road on the west, S. Grady Way on the northwest, Renton City Hall on the north/northeasti Benson Road S. on the east/southeast, and the 1-405 right-of- way on the south. C USES PERMITTED IN AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: The following use provisions take precedence over the underlying zoning: USES ALILOWED IN AREA A USES ALLOWED IN AREA B Only the following uses are permitted within Auto Mall Area A Within the CA Zone: Auto, motorcycle, snowmobile, All uses permitted by the lawn and garden equipment, and passenger truck underlying zoning sales;_Secondary uses including: Licensing bureaus, car rentals, public parking, and other uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to directly support dealerships; Within the IM Zone:Auto, motorcycle, snowmobile, lawn and garden equipment, passenger truck sales, and existing office; Secondary uses including: Licensing bureaus, car rentals, public parking, off-site parking consistent with RMC 4-14-4C3 and other uses determined by the Zoning Administrator to directly support dealerships. ©1998 Code Publishing. Inc. Page 2 D DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR USES LOCATED WITHIN AUTO MALL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS—AREAS A AND B: All permitted uses in Area A and all auto sales and related uses in Area B of the Auto Mall Improvement District shall comply with the following development standards: ALL USES IN AREA A AND NON-DEALERSHIPS AND REU DEALERSHIPS AND RELATED USES IN AREA B USES IN AREA B SERVICE AREA S rvice areas shall not face public Service areas shall not face publ ORIENTATION st leet frontage. street frontage. LANDSCAPING—A 1 5-foot-wide landscape strip along Pursuant to landscaping requirer STREET these street frontages. This frontage listed in chapter 4-2 RMC FRONTAGE reouirement is in lieu of the frontage (requirements for the underlying LANDSCAPING requirement listed for the zone in zone) and chapter 4-4 RMC. REQUIREMENTS chapter 4-2 RMC._Unimproved for lots which portions of the.right-of-way may be abut Lind Avenue used in combination with abutting S.W., S.W. Grady Pri ate property to meet the required Way, Talbot 151-foot landscape strip width. Road S. (SR-515)Thie landscaping shall include a • and Rainier minimum 30-inch high berm and red Avenue S. maples (Acer rubrum) planted 25 feet on center. LANDSCAPING—2. $% of the gross site area shall be Pursuant to landscaping requirer MINIMUM provided as on-site landscaping. listed in chapter 4-2 RMC AMOUNT AND Landscaping shall be consolidated (requirements for the underlying LOCATION and located at site entries, building zone) and chapter 4-4 RMC. • fronts, or other visually prominent locations as approved through the situ plan review process. WHEEL STOPS If frontage landscaping is relocated, If frontage landscaping is relocal then permanent wheel stops or then permanent wheel stops or continuous curbs must be installed a continuous curbs must be instal minimum of 2.5 feet from sidewalks to minimum of 2.5 feet from sidewa prevent bumper overhang of prevent bumper overhang of sidewalks. Where these requirements sidewalks. Where these requirer differ from the requirements of the differ from the requirements of tf parking, loading and driveway parking, loading and driveway regulations of chapter 4-4 RMC, these regulations of chapter 4-4 RMC, requirements shall govern. requirements shall govern. ©1998 Code Publishing. Inc. Page 3 , CUSTOMER Customer parking shall be designated Customer parking shalt be desigr PARKING r anFl striped near entry drives and and striped near entry drives and visible from public streets. Where visible from public streets. WherE possible, customer parking shall be possible, customer parking shall co�nbined with adjacent dealership combined with adjacent dealersh customer parking and shared access. customer parking and shared as Where these requirements differ from Where these requirements differ the requirements of the parking, the requirements of the parking, to ding and driveway regulations of loading and driveway regulations ch pter 4-4 RMC,these requirements chapter 4-4 RMC, these requiren shall govern. shall govern. AUTO MALL Once completed, all development Once completed, all developmen RIGHT-OF-WAY shall coordinate with a right-of-way shall coordinate with a right-of-wi IMPROVEMENT improvement plan. A right-of-way improvement plan. A right-of-way PLAN imp rovement plan shall be completed improvement plan shall be comp COORDINATION by the City in coordination with by the City in coordination with adjacent property owners, and shall adjacent property owners, and sl address gateways, signage, address gateways,signage, landscaping, and shared access. landscaping, and shared access, AUTO MALL All development shall coordinate with All development shall coordinate IMPROVEMENT the latest Auto Mall Improvement Plan the latest Auto Mall Improvement PLAN adopted by Resolution No. 3182 adopted by Resolution No. 3182 COMPLIANCE XXXX. The plan addresses potential XXXX. The plan addresses potei street vacations, right-of-way street vacations, right-of-way improvements, area gateways, improvements, area gateways, signage, landscaping, circulation, and signage, landscaping, circulation shred access. shared access. MODIFICATIONS Where full compliance with thesE provisions would create a hardsl- existing uses undergoing major modifications, the Zoning Administrator may modify them. Hardship for existing uses may n from existing lot coverage, existir siting of buildings, etc., which ' preclude full compliance. E POTENTIL WAIVER OF STREET VACATION FEES FOR DEALERSHIPS LOCATED WITHIN AREA A: All street vacation fees and compensation for the right-of-way may be waived by Council for developing properties in Area A, provided: 1. The properties are designated to be vacated on the Auto Mall Improvement Plan Map, 2. The application for street vacation conforms to RMC 9-14-11, Administrative Procedure for Righ -of Way Vacations, and 3. The uses proposed conform to subsection C of this Section. (Amd. Ord. ©1998 Code Publishing. Inc. Page 4 9-14-11 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATIONS: Exemption: In the Auto Mall (Area A), bounded by S.W. Grady Way, Rainier Avenue South, Lind-Seneca Avenue S.W. and I-405, as well as the half block abutting SW Grady Way on the north between Raymond Avenue,SW and Seneca Avenue SW, including the alley right-of-way, applications for vacations of right-of-way,or portions thereof, whether initiated by the City or the property owners, will follow the normal procedure for establishing public hearings, but thereafter will be processed according to the following procedure for uses which comply with Section 4-31-10.4F1: A. Property Services completes a master appraisal for the-entire-Area "A" of the Auto Mall. B. Property Services processes all private and City-initiated applications (all fees waived) for vacations. C. City staff review applications to ensure that the proposal conforms to the adopted plan, and that access to individual properties is maintained and does not impede street configuration and pub is safety. Comments are given to Property Services. D.Property Services provides an appraisal reconciliation for each application, transfer of title, and final report with recommendations. The applicant will provide legal description and map exhibits. _The Ciity Clerk provides requisite notice to adjacent property owners and interested parties. E.Planning/Building/Public Works Administrator reviews and approves final report. F. Transfer of property ordinance adopted by City Council. (Ord. 4608,5-20-1996) ©1998 Code Publishing, Inc. Page 1 Gd.LV Pd4.J MV FAX"`/A -r— : — ' :`L --- - - - -1 LL— _'"T_' V \ a �_ op-- - 1 I•IL mil �a �I ad MI SOF-I I - IIM . ..sdoiceigIL:1:•+.:+::ifiloorsit-C*00,1151-0 , __ e_4_,;v .A.. c__A, 1r. Id dill iP'['rriew , _iiII_c1 0f +a*'a '�i J /. r iolloovi ! N►s Are"/ iirtv 1,..,,, Ap a iff_114 ...„,,,„...--; 0.-- e er, If r , ft )7. yri/r A / ► / a A140// A Mill6 A A .4 X ' /Par ii," ::-r=7 Mr / A -.' , ) yfri— 1-- r A ...m ED __ L.ii "- ___ ____ _- _ _-- , , �. r�_ NE 5 — al. / a h RE Li= pa 1_, ::____-- 0 1111 /t4 91. .11. -- _ likr it - Lft*— ikinv 1 -gd di lack! 0 t iii:: P ''' .ail Imi EN vii a itc-- A. AK,- --i n-n ,I, , I . . .'1d Pat-- ;tad j *m11jiji�k City,Of Renton ;,. ENVIRONMENTAL 'CHECKLIST =„ PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known,for give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help deli-'be your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may a explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if ther' 44 be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does no�'/I apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant,"and "property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proposer,"and "affected geographic area,"respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City of Renton ordinance amending Area"A"of Renton's Auto Mall by reducing it's size by changing said affected area to Area"B"designation. Also modifies Section 9-14-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of-Way Vacations, by updating Area "A"to reflect proposed changes and modifying Section 9-14-11.A as it pertains to the portion of the Auto Mall where a master appraisal is required, to pertain only to that area (Area"A")where fees are waived. • tnuary 11, 2000 age 2 2. Name of applicant: Rebecca Lind, Principal Planner, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning Economic Development, Neighborhoods &Strategic Planning Department City of Renton 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Address: do Department of Economic Development, Neighborhoods & Strategic Planning City of Renton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98055 Contact Person: Don Erickson,AICP (425)430-6581 4. Date checklist prepared: January 11, 2000 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton, Department of Planning/Building/Public Works - Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Adoption of ordinance is anticipated pending SEPA compliance. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Not at the current time. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. FEIS on the 1995 Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No knowledge of pending governmental approvals of affected properties. Subject proposal is a non-project action. Specific project proposals or actions likely will occur in the area affected by this change over time. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Council approval is required for this non-project legislative action. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The subject non-project proposal is to amend Section 4-3-040B.1 and B.2 of Chapter 2, of Title 4 (Development Regulations), of Ordinance No. 4260, entitled "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton, Washington" by revising the boundaries of Area"A"of the Auto Mall overlay district in the area between Seneca and Raymond Avenues SW by deleting the portion currently zoned IM Zone. This deleted portion January 11, 2000 Page 3 • would become part of an expanded Area"B"which it abuts on the west. An Area"B" designation on the block and half affected will allow a broader array of uses, including medium industrial uses as well as the sale, rental and leasing of automobile', motorcycle, snowmobile, lawn equipment and passenger trucks. The Auto Mall Improvement Plan of April 1996 is proposed to be updated, as well, to reflect these changes. In addition to the change in Area"A", Section 9-14-11,Administrative Procedures for Right-of-way Vacations, Exemptions,would be modified. The first modification would update Area"A"to reflect the above referenced changes and street right-of- ways that could be vacated without fees. The second modification would clarify that the required master appraisal is only for that portion of the Auto Mall where street vacations are allowed (Area"A") rather than the whole Auto Mall. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any,plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The subject proposal is a non-project action that will change the allowable uses in a block and a half area of Renton's Auto Mall. Proposed code amendments will modify Area"A"of the Auto Mall located along S Grady Way in the area between Seneca Avenue South and Raymond Avenue South. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the. site (circle one); flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Nolt applicable for this non-protect legislative action. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Not applicable for this non-proiect legislative action. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. • anuary 11, 2000 'age 4 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project proposal. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not applicable for this non-protect legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Not applicable for this non-project legislative action. 3. WATER a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. • January 11, 2000 Page 5 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect legislative proposal. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-proiect legislative proposal. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. This is a non-proiect legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. b. Ground Water: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. This is a non-project legislative action. No development is proposed as a result of this proposal. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. No construction and therefore runoff is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. nuary 11, 2000 ige 6 Not applicable. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Not applicable since this is a non-project legislative action that will not result in any development that would not otherwise occur and is covered by SEPA. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: NA deciduous tree:alder, maple, aspen, other NA evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other NA shrubs NA grass NA pasture NA crop or grain NA wet soil plants:cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other NA water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other NA other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No construction and therefore no vegetation will be removed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not applicable. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Not applicable. 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Not applicable Mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Not applicable Fish:bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other Not applicable b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. January 11, 2000 Page 7 No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No construction is proposed as a result of this non-project legislative proposal. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Not applicable since this is a non-project action. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. None will be used since this is a non-project legislative action. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No! This is a non-project action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project action. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None_ This is a non-project action. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. This is a non-project action. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Not applicable since this is a non-project action 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Not applicable since this is a non-project action nuary 11, 2000 Ige8 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. This is a non-project action. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Not applicable since this is a non-project action. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Describe any structures on the site. Not applicable since this is a non-project action. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Not applicable. Proposed amendment will affect the R-1 Zone. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not applicable. The zoning text amendment would apply to any R-1 zoned property with a Residential Rural land use designation. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. Probable initial application is to Gene Coulon Park which is an environmentally sensitive site. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Not applicable. January 11, 2000 Page 9 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. 1. Pr(posed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Th subject non-project amendments endeavor to ensure that uses permitted by these proposed minor code amendments are compatible with existing and proposed land use plans for the area. The market for more dealerships sees to have lessened, as there is more consolidation occurring in the industry. The City is interested in development that is compatible with the area and provides as reasonable financial return to the City in exchange for urban services and location. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. This proposed amendment does not have a housing component. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed. Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not applicable. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere wit! views? Notl applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Not applicable. nuary 11, 2000 ige 10 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Not applicable. 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? This is a non-project legislative action. There are few recreational opportunities in the vicinity of the area affected by the proposed changes. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence .of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable. This is a non-project legislative action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private? January 11, 2000 Page 11 Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This is a legislative non-project action that will not have any transportation impacts. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Not applicable 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If sot generally describe. This is a legislative non-project action that is not likely to have any increased public service impacts than the existing configuration. Future new development allowed under these proposed amendments would most likely goy through environmental review unless exempt under SEPA. • b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable. 1 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Not applicable. Non-project action applies citywide. anuary 11, 2000 'age 12 SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: d% IJC�• �►' u drAffeki Date: `1-7MI 1 al3®0 • January 11, 2000 Page 13 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (These sheets should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. You do not need to fill out these sheets for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? This is a legislative non-project action. Subsequent development under a modified Area "A" is not anticipated to increase discharges to water or air emissions significantly. Future development will be evaluated under SEPA unless categorically exempt. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: No applicable for this non-project legislative action. Subsequent development as a result of this proposed code amendment would have to go through environmental review unless SEPA exempt. It is likely that air emissions, etc. would be addressed at this time when type and quantities of discharges are known. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? As a legislative non-project action the current proposal will not directly affect plants, animals, fish or marine life. Indirectly, by allowing uses where they cu drently are not allowed there may be minor impacts depending on which medium industrial uses develop and their proximity to any such species. Proposed (measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: No applicable. Mitigation would be prepared at the project level. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The non-project legislative action will have no impact on energy or natural resources. Subsequent development will be addressed as noted above. Proposed easures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Not applicable. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The subject non-project proposal will not directly impact or use environmentally sensitive areas. It does potentially open the door to uses that are not currently allowed in Area "A", including medium industrial uses. inuary 11, 2000 age 14 The appropriate time to address such impacts, if any, is at the time the City is presented with an actual project proposal. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Not applicable. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? This proposed non-project action would allow medium industrial uses to continue in an area zoned IM but under Area "A" was restricted to vehicular sales, rental and/or leasing. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This is a legislative non-project action that will not directly have any transportation or public service impacts. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: Not Applicable. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No conflicts with local, state or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment are known to exist with the subject non-project legislative proposal. IGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. • Proponent: Name Printed: t-14J 6I�NJ ,"/ Date: / DEVELOPMENT SERVII CITY OF RENTON CITY OF RENTON JAN 13 2000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, RECEIVED NEIGHBORHOODS,AND STRATEGIC PLANNING MEMORANDUM DATE: January 12, 2000 TO: Jana Huerter FROM: Rebecca Lind SUBJECT: Auto Mall Improvement District Modifications and Plan- SEPA Review Attached please find twelve (12) copies of the MUP, project narrative, proposed amendment language, map change, and environmental checklist for these revisions. These changes are being made in order to accommodate a greater array of medium industrial uses in the affected block and half area between Seneca Avenue SW and Raymond Avenue SW on the south side of S Grady Way. These changes also correct references to the Auto Mall in Section 9-14-11 of the RMC as well as update the Auto Mall Improvement Plan adopted in April 1996. We are currently circulating a Red File,Level 1, for these proposed minor changes. Please contact Don Erickson if you have any questions about this submittal or need additional information. Thank you. cc: Betty Nokes Don Erickson \\TS_SERVER\SYS2:\COMMON\-\\CENTRAL\SYS2\DEPTS\EconomicDevelopment\STRATPLN\PLANNING\DE\Coulon Park\MUP Trans Memo to JH.doc\d