HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA79-335 A
OF R4,4
o$ THE CITY OF RENTON
MUNICIPAL BUILOING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055
o ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER
9A `O' FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593
9�T FO SEPSE���P
June 27, 1980
Kohl Excavating, Inc.
3330 East Valley Road
Renton, WA 98055
RE: File No. PP-335-79; Kohl-Christianson Addition; Preliminary
Plat Application.
Gentlemen:
•
Pursuant to the certified letter, dated June 10, 1980, transmitted to
you from the City of Renton Planning Department, regarding inactivity
of the referenced file, the application is being officially dismissed
by the Hearing Examiner this date, as further response has not been
received by the .city.
If we can be of further assistance to you in this matter, please
contact either this office or the Planning Department at 235-2550.
Sincerely,
Fred J. Ka man
Hearing Examiner
cc: Planning Department
City Clerk
}
OF R4,4,
0 THE CITY OF RENTON
`$ 4 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
emmBARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
09'00 t) June 26, 1980 235- 2550
T6-0 SEP'1E-O
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
FROM: Gordon Y. Erickson, Planning Director
BY: David R. Clemens, Senior Plcuuier
RE: UNPROCESSED APPLICATIONS
The attached applications are more than one year old. This department
has reviewed the dismissal process with the City Attorney who indicates
that following notice to the applicants, that the Examiner should act
to dismiss the applications.
Pursuant to the Attorney`s recommendation; an June 10, 1980 each
applicant was notified by certified mail that the application was
inactive, and would be recommended for dismissal unless comments to
the contrary were received by June 24th. With the exception of the
application for rezone by Chris Palzer (R-832-75) no comments have
been received. Mr. Palzer has not responded to my letter of June 18th
which indicated that he had not provided sufficient information to
reactivate his file.
Therefore, it is recommended that the following applications be dismissed
by the Examiner:
PALZER, CHRIS, R-832-75, rezone from G to MP and H-1
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SP-029-77, special permit
to construct a maintenance and equipment storage
facility in the MP zone
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SA-030-77, site approval
for maintenance and equipment storage facility in the MP zone
KELLY, LLOYD W. , R-147-78, rezone fran R-4, R-1, and B-1
to B-1
COOKE, THOMAS, R-279-79, rezone fran G-6000 to R-4
KOHL-CHRISTIANSON, PP-335-79, application for preliminary
plat for a seven lot single family subdivision (superceded
by PP-008-80)
DRC:dc ' FARRELL, GENE 0. , PPUD-355-79 preliminary PUD for 54 unit
condominium development
Attachments
OF R��
. •• x..` o THE CITY OF RENTON
CJ 4$ ,0 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
Z BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
n .�
235- 2550
o,� June 26, 1980
1? O
MEMORANDUM
TO: Fred Kaufman, Hearing Examiner
FRCN1: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
BY: David R. Clemens, Senior Planner
RE: UNPROCESSED APPLICATIONS
The attached applications are more than one year. old. This department
has reviewed the dismissal process with the City Attorney who indicates
that following notice to the applicants, that the Examiner should act
to dismiss the applications.
Pursuant to the Attorneys recommendation,' on June 10, 1980 each
applicant was notified by certified mail that the application was
inactive, and would be recommended for dismissal unless comments to
the contrary were received by June 24th. With the exception of the
application for rezone by Chris Palzer (R-832-75) no caraments have
been received. Mr. Palzer has not responded to my letter of June 18th
which indicated that he had not provided sufficient information to
reactivate his file.
Therefore, it is recommended that the following applications be dismissed
by the Examiner:
PALZER, CHRIS, R-832-75, rezone from G to MP and H-1
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SP-029-77, special permit
to construct a maintenance and equipment storage
facility in the MP zone
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SA-030-77, site approval
for maintenance and equipment storage facility in the MP zone
KELLY, LLOYD W. , R-147-78, rezone fran R-4, R-1, and B-1
to B-1
COOKE, THOMAS, R-279-79, rezone fran G-6000 to R-4
KOHL-CHRISTIANSON, PP-335-79, application for preliminary
plat for a seven lot single family subdivision (superceded
by PP-008-80)
DRC:dc FARRELL, GENE 0. , PPUD-355-79 preliminary PUD for 54 unit
condominium development
Attachments
L
OF R4,,
0o THE CITY OF RENTON
C.) `0 ' Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
O o
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT
9.0 c°' 235- 2550
0,9ItED SEP1 �O
CERTIFIED MAIL 733831
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
•
June 10 , 1980
Kohl Excavating Inc.
3330 E. Valley Road
Renton, Washington 98055
RE: KOHL-CHRISTIANSON ADDITION, PP-335-79
Dear Gentlemen :
The above referenced application has been inactive for a
period of more than six (6) months . In order to clarify
our files , we wish to know if you will be proceeding on this
application . If you propose to proceed with the application
as submitted, please forward a schedule which you propose
to follow to complete the application.
If you do not wish to proceed With the application, or if
we do not receive a response to this letter within fourteen
(14) days, we will request that the Hearing - Examiner dismiss
the application . If the application is dismissed , any renewal
will require a. new application and fees.
If you should have any further questions regarding this letter,
please do not hesitate to contact this department .
Very truly yours, ____- _
Gord Y. Ericksen, RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
P l a n i n g D i r c tir •
SENT TO
POSTMARK
'
Kohl Excavating Inc4/
OR DATE
/ STREET AND NO.
w 3330 E Valley Road '
vid R . Clemens,6ZWif P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE ••
Senior Planner CO Renton, WA 98055 5-10-8`0
, on OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES
D R C :s h 00 RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered RECEIPT With restricted delivery I+ j
SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered al IP
With restricted delivery � S
• RESTRICTED DELIVERY g
O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)
Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other
Jan.1976 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
*GPO:1975-0-591
1
OF R4•
o, THE CITY OF RENTON
d� ,o> Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055
BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR o PLANNING DEPARTMENT
a co-Q 235- 2550
9�rFD SEP�E��� -
ME MORA NICUM
June 3, 1980
TO: Fred J . Kaufman , Hearing Examiner
FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director
By: David R. Clemens, Senior Planner
RE: UNPROCESSED APPLICATIONS
The attached applications are more than one year old .
This department would recommend that they be dismissed.
They are
PALZER, CHRIS, R-832-75, rezone from
from G to M-P and H-1
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SP-029-77 ,
special permit to construct maintenance
and equipment storage facility in M-P
zone
TRI-STATE CONSTRUCTION CO. , SA-030-77 ,
site approval for maintenance and
equipment storage facility in M-P zone
KELLY, LLOYD W. , R-147-78, rezone from
R-4, R-1, B-1 to B-1
COOKE, THOMAS, R-279-79 , rezone from
G-6000 to R-4
KOHL-CHRISTIANSON, PP-335-79, application
for preliminary plat approval . of 7 lot
single family subdivision
DRC: wr
Attachments •
CITY OF RENTON
SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. PP-335 -1
MAJOR PLAT DATE REC'D. ' i3- 77
/ TENTATIVE a`1 rO APPLICATION FEE $
PRELIMINARY O ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW FEE $
FINAL 151g
, Z RECEIPT NO.
• �� SM NO.
gNNINa
APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS,�.1 THROUGH 7 :
l�1. Plat Name & Location 7)Hc.^ CH/2 / .f %//4/JSC7/.!' �00/ 77O1-,
5 Ai f/,vSE, vo • /3 ' e5cJ /71/kr S4}' ;' 8/ -c-11/M:trie
2 . No. Lots 7 Total Acreage /. 3 .4k Zoning iZ"/
3 . Owner 4fri1. AxCAP•f iligC, tpc . Phone 26, (e,Z 0
Address 0330 A.,144-z44'" Ro.40 /21.J7M•..i /. l qsio s^.I'
5 . Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed
Telephone ( ) ( '') ( )
Electric ( ) ( --) ( )
Street Lights ( ) ( ,-) ( )
Natural Gas ( ) ( u) . ( )
TV Cable ( ) ( ( )
6 . Sanitation & Water:
( r) City Water ( "'") Sanitary Sewers
( ) Water District No. ( ) Dry Sewers
( ) Septic Tanks
7 . Vicinity and plat maps as required by Subdivision Ordinance.
8. DATE REFERRED TO:
ENGINEERING PARKS
BUILDING HEALTH
TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY
FIRE COUNTY PLANNING
BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER
9 . STAFF ACTION:
TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED
APPEALED EXPIRED
10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION:
SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED
FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED
12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS :
DATE DATE BOND NO. AND
TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT '
Planning Dept.
Rev. 1/77
CITY OF RENTON, WASH I NGTON • ./`e. E 1°1I ,
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 16 ''�•+ Qom!
Application No. II � � - `��/ `` N1NG
Environmental Checklist No. ,fC/-- .5 _ 7,9
PROPOSED, date: FINAL,/ date:
Declaration of Significance � Declaration of Significance
Declaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance
COMMENTS:
Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires
all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their
own actions and when licensing private proposals ., The Act also requires that an EIS be
prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where
you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should •
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele-
vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all
agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with-
out duplicating paperwork in the future.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to
your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the
next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I. BACKGROUND �,r'
1. Name of Proponent W! 2XC.44V4 j/1JC' i//JR-
2. Address and phone number of Proponent:
V4u.45-*, /2G14D 2, ,/..d ra,.. GUI47er 48a�''J
%e_z., 226 -66zo
3. Date Checklist submitted
4. Agency requiring Checklist x4,lo�//�Si �� yip.
2,0
5. Name of proposal , if applicable:
,(170 taL CH12/ST/dati/sowJ 4i /.r o,—)
6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its
size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an •accur'ate
understanding of its scope and nature) :
r
-2-
7. Location of proposal (describe, the physical setting of the proposal , as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including
any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal ) :
4 r W cc roa //
'i C.C! / / ON .57/.64,S;/Ail i /34 v®
ir,`ca".t..J c°,at'b i.�4i s e' S?
8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal :
�� l 741/ 7L 1:_=, Zcv l 750
9. List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal
(federal , state and local --including rezones) :
PC4%T/�Cr /Z./3 %-'E"RM,rl
10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity
related to or connected' with this proposal? If yes, explain:
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes , explain:
v
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro-
posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future
date, describe the nature of such application form:
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
(1) Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic 4,
substructures?
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Disruptions, displacements , compaction or over-
covering of the soil?
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
Y • M AY1B E Al
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features? ✓
YET— MAYBE N�
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils ,
either on or off the site?
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which
may modify the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Y€- MAYBE au-
Explanation:
Cc l 0/5Pc, /C E-4. T $ OO TPtic R i.. j /Jae- T 12r/aEu i//k Gigs
C) CiAr /t9cr l/✓ 7JPtaept4n/4 i, r.
•
-3-
(2) Air. Will the proposal result in: •
(a) Air emissions or deterioration. of ambient air
quality?
YES MAYBE NO
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
Yrs— MAYBE AU •
—
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
YTS MAYBE AU—
Explanation:
•
•
(3) Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
vrr— MAYBE WO--
(b) Changes in -absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff? '.--
YES WE E W
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
YES MAYBE NU—
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
surface water quality, including but not limited to
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ►�
YES MAYBE Nlf
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? v •
TES— MAYBE NO'
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals , or through
• interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
(h) - Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, �..
or other substances into the ground waters?
ES MAYBE AU
(i ) Reduction in the amount of water-' otherwise available
for public water supplies? to,•.
YES MAYBE AU—
Explanation: (4) 174.4$1.404r J/fiiA,f t 60i f-
(4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any
species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
YE3— MAYBE AU—
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or
endangered species of flora?
YET- RATErA�
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or
" in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing
species?
TES MAYBE AU—
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
TES RAW AT'
Explanation:
-4-
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)? t
YES WRY NO
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna?
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
YES RATITE NO
Explanation: .
(6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: NO/Sc.f 5Lee- /i-Ctl /�a '" AS'/o0-'7/4"--
•
(7), Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
, YES MAYBE T6-
Explanation:
(8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? 1/
YET— MAYBE NO
Explanation:
(9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
YES M YBE NO
Explanation:
(10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil , pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions?
YES MAYBE N�
Explanation:
(11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bution, density, or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
yr - MAYBE Nb—
'Explanation: P449A g.Cr /2Cr 71244u Sh/ Le, /giajpo`cil
7 /Nc)k f- 7DJ..
r.
-5-
(12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: 2 1tS Neki jC/JJeivj/4- / ri)t/>v¶
(13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? "r
YES MAYBE ENO
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking?
• YES MAYBE NO
• (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems?
YES MAYBE R
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods? •
'YET- MAYBE NO
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? - �-
YET- MAYBE NO
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
VET- MAYBE NO
Explanation: (CO 6) - V ,'i/Cdi-4it ye:L-yeh/i
C 4(dse. � y l2 ssr� �i�� Tim /es
(14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or
result in a heed for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas :
(a) Fire protection? ✓
YES MAYBE 0-
(b) Police protection?
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Schools? ✓
YES MAYBE NO
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
YES MAYBE .NO
(e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? ✓
YES MAYBE NO
(f) Other governmental services? ✓
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
•
(15) Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
YET- MAYBE
Explanation: •
• (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? ✓
YES MAYBE NO
(b) Communications systems? ✓
YES MAYBE NO
(c) Water? r'
YES MAYBE NO
-6-
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
YES MAYBE NO
(e) Storm water drainage? *"
YES RUNE N-
(f) Solid waste and disposal? ✓
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation: ( /) '(ci Lvro./S/ c)1.JS ae
YezGc-' t L/-Cr
( � G,t1a9,4c 4-4)49/W )
(17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
YES MAYBE W
Explanation:
(18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to, the public, or will the -
proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
YES MAYBE N0
Explanation:
(19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
YES MAYBE WU—
Explanation:
(20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical �.
site, structure, object or building?
YES MAYBE NO
Explanation:
III. SIGNATURE
I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw, any decla-
ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any willful misrepresentation or willful ack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent: 3` Graz I"';j .�
' signed)
MO CHc2/17- 41 sox)
(name printed
City of Renton
Planning Department
5-76
OF R4,
A
& �' THE CITY OF RENTON
.v 4p f;....eti'Y.r O
U e0 r4 MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH.98055
n caLLz' ' ;� CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR 0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0
235— 2550
.9 A co,
0,91TE.D SEP1°4'
April 16 , 1979
Dr. Gary Kohlwes
Superintendet
Renton School District
430 Main Avenue South
Renton , Washington 93055
RE : KOHL-CHRISTIANSON ADDITION, APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL OF 7-LOT SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION, File PP-335-39;
property located on S.W. Sunset Blvd btwn 80th Ave. SE &
81st Ave. SE
Dear Dr. Kohlwes :
Enclosed is a copy of KOHL-CHRISTIANSON ADDITION PREL. PLAT
We would appreciate any comments by April 27. 1979 •
If we receive no comments by that time , we will
assume you have no objections . Should you have any
questions , please contact this department .
Very truly yours ,
Gor on Y . Er,' s n
P1 nnng Dire o
Val
vid R. Clemens
Associate Planner
DRC: wr
Enclosure