Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA80-055 RENTON CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting August 11 , 1980 Municipal Building Monday , 8 : 00 P .M . Council Chambers MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch led the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag and called the meeting of the Renton City Council to order. ROLL CALL OF THOMAS W. TRIMM, Council President; EARL CLYMER, ROBERT HUGHES, COUNCIL RANDALL ROCKHILL, RICHARD M. STREDICKE, JOHN REED, CHARLES F. SHANE. CITY OFFICIALS BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, Mayor; MAXINE MOTOR, Deputy City Clerk; IN ATTENDANCE MIKE PARNESS, Administrative Assistant; WARREN GONNASON, Public Works Director; GORDON ERICKSEN, Planning Director; DON PERSSON, Police Dept.; LARRY WARREN, City Attorney PRESS Greg Anderson, Renton Record Chronicle MINUTE APPROVAL MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND CLYMER, APPROVE THE COUNCIL MINUTES OF AUGUST 4, 1980 AS WRITTEN. CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted, published and mailed according to law, Mayor Shinpoch opened the Street Vacation public hearing to consider proposed street vacation, cul de sac Portion of NE 12th on NE 12th St. as requested by the City of Renton. Letter was St. read from the Board of Public Works stating the cul de sac was not necessary for traffic ci -Ailation, no easements required, VAC-6-80 value of the property $4.00/sq. ft. ,and that there were no objections to the street vacation. Mr. Warren Gonnason, Public Works Director, added that the property would be declared surplus. MOVED BY SHANE, SECOND ROCKHILL, THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND HUGHES, THE STREET VACATION BE GRANTED AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND ONE-HALF OF THE APPRAISED VALUE BY CHARGED AND REFER TO WAYS AND MEANS. CARRIED. AUDIENCE COMMENT Gary Faull , Attorney for Brady International , requested to speak Glacier Park Co. on item regarding Glacier Park Co. Preliminary Plat PP-055-80. Preliminary Plat MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, TO REMOVE ITEM FROM CONSENT AGENDA PP-055-80. REGARDING GLACIER PARK CO. PP-055-80: CARRIED. The item is the Hearing Examiner recommendation for approval with conditions Glacier Park Co. Preliminary Plat PP-055-80; property located SW corner of Lind SW between SW 29th St. and SW 34th. Mr. Faull , representing Brady International-purchasers of propertv,parcel A- requested deferral of sidewalk improvements to the property. Following discussion it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND SHANE, DUE TO ERROR IN FINDINGS OF FACT DO NOT SUPPORT CONCLUSION OF LAW IN ITEM 2 OF THE HEARING EXAMINER' S DECISION. THEREFORE, PORTION "A" DEFERRAL FOR TWO YEARS OF SIDEWALKS AND EXTENDING EXISTING BOND FOR THE PERIOD; PORTION "B" OF PLAT BE FULFILLED AT THIS TIME WITH OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS AS AGREED TO. CARRIED. Councilman Stredicke voted no. Fifth and Park Upon request it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REMOVE ITEM Place Co.-Special FROM AGENDA REGARDING APPEAL OF HEARING EXAMINER'S DECISION RE Permit SP-050-80 SPECIAL PERMIT SP-050-80 FIFTH AND PARK PLACE CO. AND HEAR AT THIS Appeal TIME. CARRIED. Planning and Development Minority Committee report submitted by Councilman Rockhill was read which stated that the Hearing Examiner was in error and recommended a lease guaranteeing the parking would be available or the first floor area be modified for parking. Planning and Development Committee (Majority) Report was read finding no error in fact or law and affirmed the decision of the Hearing Examiner of denial . Stephen Crane, Attorney representing Eugene Horbach, 350 Grand Central on the Park, Seattle, submitted lease for 30 years with two five year options (total of 40 years) for the parking areas. Following discussion it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, TABLE THE MATTER FOR ONE WEEK,REFER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Renton City Council 8/11/80 Page 2 Audience Comment - Continued Sandy Webb, 430 Mill Ave. So. #3, requested explanation of consent agenda items re exchange of property with Winford K. Moore and revision to Parking and Loading Ordinance. Exchange of MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE, REMOVE ITEM FROM CONSENT AGENDA Property REGARDING EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WITH WINFORD K. MOORE AND HEAR AT Winford K. Moore THIS TIME. CARRIED. Letter was read from Warren Gonnason, Board of Public Works,which noted no objections. to the exhange of right-of-way with Winford K. Moore, Sixth Street Alley, Lying between Cedar Ave. S. and Mill Ave. S. and recommended referral to the City Attorney for appropriate legal action. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND STREDICKE, CONCUR IN THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Revisions to MOVED BY CLYMER, SECOND ROCKHILL, REMOVE ITEM FROM CONSENT AGENDA Parking and REGARDING REVISIONS TO THE PARKING AND LOADING ORDINANCE. CARRIED. Loading Ordinance Letter was read from Warren Gonnason, Board of Public Works, which requested revisions to Parking and Loading Ordinance and recommended referral to the Planning and Development Committee for review. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECOND REED TO CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Recess MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECOND SHANE,TO RECESS. CARRIED. 9:10 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:20 p.m. Roll Call : All council members present as previously listed. CONSENT AGENDA The following items are adopted by one motion which follows those business matters included. Joint Use Study Letter from Warren Gonnason, Public Works Department, presented Water Distr. #14 RH2 Engineering proposal to perform a joint use study for Water and #63 Districts #14 and #63 in West Hill . Refer to the Utilities Committee for report back. Transfer of Letter from Warren Gonnason, Public Works Department, request Funds-Payment of for fund transfer in the amount of $33,057.16 for payment of Jones Associates Jones Associates for work performed on LID #314. , Refer to LID #314 Ways and Means Committee for appropriate legislation. Transfer of Funds- Letter from Gwen Marshall , Finance Director, requested transfer of Paper Shredder funds in the amount of $2,690.52 from Fire Department repair and maintenance account to Finance to replace paper shredder. Refer to Ways and Means Committee. Transfer of Funds Letter from Gwen Marshall , Finance Director, requested transfer of Salary increase, funds in the amount of $339,048.00 for 1980 Union exempt and 21-R Longevity, Salary salary increase and fire management longevity adjustment and implemen- Survey tation of the salary survey 6/1/80. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for Resolution. Transfer of Funds- Letter from Sharon Green, Personnel , requested transfer of funds Unemployment from cumulative reserve for payment of unemployment benefits owed Benefits for 2nd quarter 1980 in the amount of $1 ,796.72. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Revised Rainier Letter from Delores Mead, City Clerk, 10% letter of intent to annex Annexation property to Renton (revised) Rainier Annexation; Vicinity west side of Rainier Ave. N. , located SW of North entrance to Renton Airports 2 acres in size including street R/W. Set public meeting for September 15, 1980. Consent Agenda MOVED BY TRIMM, SECOND ROCKHILL, TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA. Approval CARRIED. OLD BUSINESS Community Services Community Services Committee Chairman Reed presented committee report Committee that the state requires group home applicants to conform to local buildi Group Homes and fire codes. The committee added the city has adequate legislation to assure health,safety & welfare of those receiving, the services provided - by group homes.Committee recommendation was no action is necessary. MOVE BY STREDICKE,SECOND REED TO CONCUR IN COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # 6- 0 AGENDA ITEM • RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING , '' = = ===== = ., SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of August 11 , 1980 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. PP-055-80; Glacier Park Consent X Public Hearing Company; Preliminary Plat. Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 7-17-80 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X Other Clearance conditions FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required $ SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary.) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced preliminary plat application was published on July 17, 1980, and an appeal period established to expire on July 31 , 1980. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council members following the seven day period from the date of publication, and will be scheduled on the City Council agenda on August 11 , 1980 (unless reconsidered or appealed) for approval . (S �4 ;ems C3� G PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: `,`r-'� �� J°.c '�'rr;� See page 3 of the attached report. " SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. • OF R.6,, .� 4'ie• ° THE CITY OF RENTON U ma = MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA' Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR ® LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER BOO Pco FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 9�T 'O SEP1°°' August 1 , 1980 Mr. Gary Faull P.O. Box 26 Renton, WA 98055 RE: File No. PP-055-80; Glacier Park Company; Preliminary Plat. Dear Mr. Faull : This is to notify you that the above referenced request, which was approved subject to• conditions as noted on the Examiner's report of July 17, 1980, has not been appealed within the time period established by ordinance. Therefore, this application is being submitted to the City Clerk for transmittal to the City Council for review and approval . You will be notified of all action taken by the City Council at a subsequent date. Sincerely, Fred J. Kaufman • Hearing Examiner • cc: Planning Department City Clerk For use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Land Use Hearing Examiner For Agenda Of August 11 , 1980 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Marilyn Petersen (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: File No. PP-055-80; Glacier Park Consent X Company; Preliminary Plat. Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc. )Attach New Business Study Session A. Examiner's Report, 7-17-80 Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes No N/A X COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Approval with Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A X condition, Other Clearance FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure Required $ Amount Appropriation- Budgeted Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner regarding the referenced preliminary plat application was published on July 17, 1980, and an appeal period established to expire on July 31 , 1980. The report is hereby forwarded to City Council members following the seven day period from the date of publication, and will be scheduled on the City Council agenda on August 11 , 1980 (unless reconsidered or appealed) for approval . PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: See page 3 of the attached report. SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMEMTATION. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING State of Washington) County of King ) Marilyn J. Petersen , being first duly sworn, upon oath disposes and states: That on the 17 t h day of July , 19 80 affiant deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below-entitled application or petition. Subscribed and sworn this V`( day of 561Y 19 . \\wa kb_QA} Notary Public in and for the State_ of Washington, residing at Renton • Application, Petition or Case: Glacier Park Co. ; PP-055-80 (The minutea contain a £,i4.t o6 the paati.ea o6• necond) July 17, 1980 OFFICE OF THE LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RENTON CITY COUNCIL. APPLICANT: Glacier Park Company FILE NO. PP-055-80 LOCATION: Southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. between S.W. 29th Street and S.W. 34th Street. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: The applicant seeks preliminary approval of a two-lot resubdivision of a parcel contained in a previously approved formal plat, Orillia Industrial Park, Phase I . SUMMARY OF Planning Department: Approval RECOMMENDATION: Hearing Examiner: Approval with conditions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Planning Department preliminary report was received by the REPORT: Hearing Examiner on July 11 , 1980. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Planning Department report, examining available information on file with the application, and field checking the property and surrounding area, the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: The hearing was opened on July 15, 1980 at 9:25 a.m. in the Council Chambers of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. It was reported that the Hearing Examiner and the applicant had received and reviewed the Planning Department report. Roger Blaylock, Associate Planner, reviewed the report , and entered the following exhibits into the record: Exhibit #1 : Application File containing Planning Department report and other pertinent documents Exhibit #2: Preliminary Plat Map Mr. Blaylock advised that Exhibit #2 designates the replatted area in red within the existing Glacier Park plat. The Examiner requested testimony by the applicant. Responding was: Gary Faull P.O. Box 26 Renton, WA 98055 Mr. Faull introduced representatives for the applicant in attendance, and indicated their availability to respond to inquiries by the Hearing Examiner or Planning Department staff. As a result of the issuance of an opinion by the Attorney General early in the year to which the city had given substantial weight, Mr. Faull indicated that delay of the subject application had occurred in order to allow the opportunity for revision from a short plat application to a formal plat of the two lots. He submitted a letter from James F. Stengel , Landsearch Corporation, which chronologizes development efforts for relocation of the Brady International Hardwoods Company. The letter was entered into the record by the Examiner as follows: Exhibit #3: Letter to Gary Faull from James Stengel , dated July 9, 1980; attached chronology The letter discusses a critical timing problem due to the opportunity for lease cancellation by the current lessor for the company, the Port of Tacoma, and the necessity for prompt approval and processing of the subject application to allow commencement of construction of the facility prior to inclement weather. The Examiner apologized for delays incurred by the applicant; however, he noted that opinions of the Attorney General carry persuasive weight in determination of city procedures. Referring to future applications for replatting of property contained in the original Glacier Park plat, he suggested planning applications far in advance or reviewing possible means of tempering the Attorney General 's Opinion. The Examiner requested testimony in support or opposition to the application. There was PP-055-80 Page Two no response. He then invited final comments from the Planning Department staff. Since there were no further comments offered, the hearing regarding File No. PP-055-80 was closed by the Examiner at 9:40 a.m. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Having reviewed the record in this matter, the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1 . The request is for approval of an 8.4 acre, two-lot preliminary plat. This is a resubdivision of an existing lot contained within the previously approved plat of Orillia Industrial Park, Phase I , and is consistent with the Attorney General 's Opinion, AGO, 1980, No. 5. 2. The application file containing the application, SEPA documentation, the Planning Department report, and other pertinent documents was entered into the record as Exhibit #1 . 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , R.C.W. 43.21 .C. , as amended, a Declaration of Non-Significance has been issued for the subject proposal by the Environmental: Review Committee, responsible official . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all city departments affected by the impact of this development. 5. There was no opposition to the proposal expressed. 6. All existing utilities are available and in close proximity. 7. The proposal is compatible with the required setbacks, lot coverage and height requirements of Section 4-730 (M-P; Manufacturing Park) of Title IV, Ordinance No. 1628, Code of General Ordinances. 8. The property is located on the southeast corner of Lind Avenue S.W. between S.W. 29th Street and S.W. 34th Street. 9. The site was annexed into the city in 1959. The current M-P classification was applied in 1969 and a final plat was approved in July of 1978. Subsequent to that approval , the applicant applied for approval of a short plat to redivide Lot 7 into two smaller lots. Pursuant to an opinion from the City Attorney as to the effects of an Attorney General Opinion (see above) , the request for short plat was dismissed and this request for preliminary plat was initiated. 10. The subject site is generally level as the result of grading and filling operations which have occurred on the site. The only vegetation on the site are scrub grasses and weeds. 11 . The site is currently undeveloped. Part of the subject property is proposed for development upon completion of the platting process. Concurrently with this application there were submitted a request for special permit to grade and fill the site and a request for site approval for office and warehouse purposes. 12. The area surrounding the subject site is in transition from undeveloped to industrial , warehouse and office uses of a manufacturing park type nature. Service Paper and Superior Fast Freight are located adjacent to the site. 13,. The applicant proposes dividing the subject lot (Lot 7) into two lots, one of which will be approximately 4.34 acres (Parcel A) ; and the remaining lot, Parcel B, will be approximately 4.05 acres. Parcel B will be developed by the Brady International Hardwoods Company. 14. Improvements, with the exception of sidewalks and the necessary curb cuts and landscaping, have been installed. CONCLUSIONS: 1 . The preliminary plat as proposed appears to serve the public use and interest . The area already has been extensively subdivided into parcels of various sizes which permits the applicant to meet the needs of a variety of potential occupants of the Orillia Industrial Park. The proposed subdivision will permit the establishment of two parcels which are each about four acres in size. The prospective purchaser, Brady International , has indicated that their needs 4 Pr-u55-80 Page Three would be effectively served by the smaller sized parcel . The purchaser intends to build a warehouse/storage facility on the smaller of the two parcels. 2. With the exception of sidewalks and those curb cuts and driveways which will be determined by the potential user, all improvements have been installed pursuant to the previously approved plat of Orillia Industrial Park. Sidewalks should be installed to permit safe pedestrian movement at this time rather than waiting for total development. Currently, pedestrians would have to use irregularly filled areas or the street. 3. The proposed preliminary plat is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan which indicates that the area is suitable for the development of manufacturing uses and consistent with the M-P zoning classification of the site. RECOMMENDATION: Exhibit #2 is approved subject to the installation of sidewalks along Lind Avenue S.W. and S.W. 29th Street. ORDERED THIS 17th day of July, 1980. A‘-‘4 .\ ac.k. Fred J. K fman Land Use earing Examiner TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of July, 1980 by Affidavit of Mailing to the parties of record: Gary Faull , P.O. Box 26, Renton, WA 98055 Jim Stengel , Landsearch, Seattle Tower, Seattle, WA 98101 TRANSMITTED THIS 17th day of July, 1980, to the following: Mayor Barbara Y. Shinpoch Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Warren C. Gonnason, Public Works Director Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director Michael Porter, Planning Commission Chairman Ron Nelson, Building Division Supervisor Lawrence J . Warren, City Attorney Pursuant to Title IV, Section 3015 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before July 31 , 1980. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a' written request for review by the Examiner within fourteen (14) days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record, take further action as he deems proer. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Section 3016, which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk accompanying a filing fee of $25.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection in the Finance Department, first floor of City Hall , or same may be purchased at cost in said department. ...-- '1..4' Op.12',rkv Iv rtii,fi 14.4 .1,..„ .... 4" .5....„-•-r- Adeleilt * /4.1 .1,:1,; 1' '''°‘ • — ._ . _.__ , r • ' N ' 4tin er., -.. ..%.:- ,-.' i , - • ,, .., • I ; . .,, I . it •, , I. • t•1 t •41 '1.‘. ..'"'•4. • ".•• I#74.4.. a'1,;•••'4 :..40,...r....Va. • I ri 1 • +,•• ali •. 11 . ; I 1 .1, + • 1 . ++.1 , , ••• ' • . '• .. et ' I ...,r1•1" ' ., . : el, I I • I . , J I \,.., -• I -..) , 1 •t . r , ! +.4 P.11.:....• r, •• ....... 4 0••A... laNtr 1 - • is 1- r• .•, . • I 49.4,i 42 .*'. . ' . . I , •.-- . - h•4.-r 4,•:• ...• 1k:' .: A ...:. , , k I . •ta ',.;.',. „ . • . . • .1r—Vitrrh7.1....-' ' r 7 4.o , . •. , i ti I ? • , . rk (/' •'•••"' ! .-.i. '- .. , - '.• ...............1 • • • • . •••; i. . . ,. ; . :c.., :. ‘ b :''''. • •., , i ,....L I A' 6,1 .. ;..., , .• ': 00 , , . ., . .:- , -, . . .: • . . . . - . .- • . t. .., — i--- ; ..r i • 4 , 1 . .. . 4 II •• • ,. . . — • . ; • , .. 1 • i - ..e • ; , 1.7... 1 • 'k ••'''rl a. 1 • • i •.., 4 . , ••,,,,z ,,, S W ..,41.1 .5 r WET& • • V 7 • . 41 en.,f•.' 4. . '•••-,),.4. 1i' ItIltt • , ' • '.I Al • • ' .1 .21 ...24% .. 4)1 • I I: r ' 4 Fii q 4•, 1.!•-• ..i4,,., . 1 4),t.,• 4`,',1-. - •IX; '' '04•.! ..74.1•,, Of • , • NI r , . :, • ( •li:\ .1.4'N1 PRELI M I INI ARY PL.AT I , .,. G•Igt.41.1 I 44,44 Pt INC . • t.• , 'v,,,r•• • •, .1 A REPL AT OF LOT 7,bt 0.7K I, fiUNL ING1ON Norour.nr:N,,:s 0.0 "••••,,,,f Sklar .4 Or L ORIL LIA INDLLmiAL nariK OF RENTON,DIV I ' 4 1 • ................—....................... .•. ';'•••• % V,L • • .,-, t ` ' 1 - i•': • .- - . •. '- N ; "..k." • -"" ' 1- ,V'i"14,,4r'4..0 f0,l_4',:,r.,%..;'r.e•.,.'.".;'1"':.0"•','1,,,,i..1 5•,4 4-•.,•-',*'. te.Ce.„rkf,,,,,4,.. A A -•1 ..l1' ',.•'1,,,,;,,if c.••.';5.'1e.*.'•,.'.',''' .. -`;'•.4a`-- e.'.';4 r": ,?.' ,4.•'.- t• AJ ' ,'. . ' ',r'. ,•-•r ' f• • L ' AA , 1 - , 1 4 • .,,a0. ;,,,•k• ,%2.,04,.vc.,.p •,t.'l.e,_ • • ," , ' " .‘,14.4r: ' ":',It''‘' ', ,1,1k10 ,'' ''',,i.". ‘;‘, r'''',i'' i • 4 ,"I" •'.•'• • •., .1 ' * 1 '' ..• 2 ., " • •")..0..11 ' 1 „ . 2..'i„." '• ..'.' kei?I's a ; , f.. . . , tr '. • as ,4 , • ,s,, t, 'a•:. ' ' " • • 1 ••• t "••.•r ..t, ,• . ''N • . .... 4. .1i 1, 1,. 0. , , \ t. .1', f ...., • • ,,c‘ , ,I v . es .-4 :',r, ••• 4,4::"......4''4' u"' „'" 2.. . —% 4 ' " ' iC P. -. q .k- 11 r" ' rl' • ' -. '''' 1 " 4 *1; Mt -:'• ..-•N' 4 ls i 1,'-:. . • , ... ‘"•t."1 •- • 1("" .• ti., '` ? JO • t ' -7 0. tt, • . ..,. . „ ,. . . , . ... '• '. 4 r.' '‘: . .4 , 4., , 0..0 ' •••t) c,,, ) t,‘.'s „ 1:le „. ," 2:..,,,11 . Ji'' .g.,t, ..224 1..), ••4...,,.;1 1 •;•• , .•,,; . • cl. - 4 -• ;••; ,, -- "- -c 4,i 'VI i 4 • I A... ••• • r•"-* A.. : , .r•e.;:''' ''"• k - ' .J•,' ''t' I '1 • .1.' ....' t s ' 14, , ', 1 ,I 4„k de r .0,, ikkJ, ,41( '1 :., . n'. 44 4 .. ' ..,,* . • • 4 • , "''' • \tel.. "4.ei• t 4:1 , k.'T•r...t ',co..•‘,110.1.2. 14 pk7 4,/, , p ... . .1.„ .). ,4„..;L..°44• •t,.t, ''' ‘ •••• '' . '' .,i. ,.., .. 4 , .si ,,, ,, 3.. ,,.,, ,. .. . .. L , •0 t- 1.'.'••'. ,. • .: '.1„, 1 '''' N. 't ,,,*(10".4 *r 4,4 iki;,ro$ ' r kr' :,*''s Ali' ,,',7" ,., ..‘) a •••1 A . • ' .`4"-''.)'r`. ;kt 4 a; s *'•.'•'a.. : 't: l•k +V t,„ ri -, 117 )-4 IP, J.4 VIA' .4 -e.- -v.::, it,,,,,,,t40,50h,, .., ,,, ,', .4,-. 1:•-. -di .4., ..''L., •1 2:',.•L',...,,i;k1•1 i;0.•i ,•A., .rrle 2.1 si,.‘,:r t-,A1 'Y'',...4 Or,,..1.10--.,,••4 *;,,, 4',,,,e‘ • ',1 ,,, t•,,) .2 4 ...,•,..,,,,4,•.1",i,••. c•-;....6",,,e,.,; *: •t :',:.".:k 14 .4,, .c,,';..,*•,'0,''`,,,:t,,•''',", •. : ,',,,,,I.,!.41')' 'I. ,./1`,„.4.1,,,',-4•;,,,,l'iVe„,...), ''''4,e,":".....L1,4"Tr,. ...y.:,..,.,:, ... ,:,,,,...1_ .4,`14.0 r,4 it:•I,••z 1,1.,tr':.0•:',"rc.,i, 1,1 4,,.... h, ",:*4,1 4 1,... , 4, -1 .,. .s '.1. •,t.4 ;•'4,-f.likfk .s.-11.1f."$7.,,, ivi fecii!, 1.4 ''''It.e.• ,'1-lit4 4'se yi,;* ...er4ita`il li ,,,,''' i i;, — ,., 'I•I`''.7 • '. '•l''4'• 2.); 1,'l'1..." re-.t.4.''',:r,4:0 •'r-1P . -:'`.1.'l' k,'A.- ,t,..v,• ;• MAIO; 24*,'.., ,,,, •ta. e ,4 It.,,..‘1 (' ...'?- -.4. c. .p•f•a,-- • r. (.. ..-.•,, .• ii -.V....,:e ••' LI`.41441.4t1 t ' % 134 S, 0 I,. ' V•r 4, 44, ir,',...L•, ,.., jo• ,witr-i,,f; 4.,,,,`k L'44-":::.:4c...,,,i...-t.....01,; .„t,,..,..... r.0.1'.,.;:'' 14tr, - c,',,.1.?,,.1.4,"1"i4:.,,t';',,V144 14'''',,';:,:,•k•,/,.. I,"':. 1,,,,,'„,,,,,V ' ,: 0,, ,' '''''' V-1: ki'...1% al • 0 .',.0 ' •' , , 5-y• ,,,,, —.L. . , .-; ., k • ' , Tr ii,,, ..,:* r •),4447,4 • ,,•':4,,- /1'4 iv;-,4)1 .,',1'.‘,' -4 ,44;tts, 4... 4++, it,' Atl,'t,t•iF ` ‘,. ,' 4 e:- t 4,,,, ', , •., • f• .44ti k . ' y .I. *T1.-04 1 jh 1 ,,,,..: , .0, ..,-V.i...olet'u,,, • • 4. ...w,)0 A -tv ,t.,, 4*• • ... . . . --,,- , .,- , ,,,e .. 4-P'..t •tii,,Wih•a!t.,.“:11.._1_'• ',„..•,,s.e.e, le".1...1f.'i'4., -*,,'22'I.," rollIN4 /..:.*,"0 's•,.ck Ai 1..27 2 44 '-.. ', 2,44‘t.ef•qi.kt, • 4 I. ,,-,-•i 1,-,.. -.• .4 - 4,,1.. L4 4:4 iirtnil ',t•4,4 44,li Jler,g,,, C. ,•". - ./. V ' ' i . - --..----.--------- ---- •, _ ..: L . .., ,"I } M k4 LAN DB EARCH 1 4% CORPORATION win 191. SEATTLE TOWER • SEATTLE 98101 • 206-624-4242 July 9, 1980 Mr. Gary F. Faull • Attorney at Law P.O. Box 26 Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Applications to City of Renton Orillia Investors - Site Plan Approval Orillia Investors - Fill and Grade Permit Burlington Northern - Preliminary Plat Approval Dear Gary: Following our June 26 , 1980 meeting at the City of Renton with Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director, and Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney, I reviewed with Mr. H. E. Kerry, Jr. the results of that meeting and our recommendation that you were best suited to make the formal presentation to the Hearing Examiner at the July 15 public hearing, to "walk through" the final plat application documentation and to address the necessary letters to the Hearing Examiner and to the subcommittee of the Renton City Council seeking to expedite the formal approvals of each in our effort to recover four to six weeks of good weather construction time which will otherwise be lost to "normal processing time." In response to your request for background information, I attach a chronology setting forth the efforts of Mr. Kerry, Brady International Hardwoods Company, Burlington Northern and Landsearch Corporation to secure the site and to permit start of construction by July 1, 1980. Enclosed for your information is copy of the purchase agreement with Burlington Northern which provides specifically for a closing not later than June 30, 1980, which recognizes the need for the short plat and the appoint- ment of Burlington Northern as agent of H. E. Kerry or Assigns (Orillia Investors) to accomplish such short plat. The cause of the critical timing problem is the ability of the Port of Tacoma to cancel its lease with Brady International Hardwoods Company. See copy of lease attached. On April 1, 1980, Port of Tacoma gave formal notice of termination to Brady International Hardwoods Company. Because of verbal notice given many months prior, the Port of Tacoma is trying to enforce the vacation of the premises by Brady not later than October 1, 1980. Mr. Kerry and BIHC attorneys are negotiating for additional time. RECEIVED CITY OF RENTON _ HEARING EXAMINER E9 I X BIT Up151980 1� AM PM ITEM O. ffr--•. 5 P .3 7,8,91100112,1,213,4.5,E A • Mr. Gary F. Faull July 9, 1980 Page 2 You will appreciate the cost in time, money, effort and disruption of business entailed in an intermediate move. Thus you understand the need for your best efforts to secure the most prompt processing possible by all agencies in the City of Renton. For the July 15, 1980 Hearing Examiner' s public hearing, Mr. Kerry and I will be present with Neil Kretzer of the Burlington Northern, Albert J. Hebrank, engineer for Gardner Engineers, the firm which has prepared the short plat and preliminary plat documentation, and a representative of Lance Mueller and Associates. I assume you have received a copy of the morning agenda which places us first, second., , and fourth. Please allow adequate time so you may be present to assist with all three matters. • Roger Blalock tells me the Planning Staff report on each of the three matters will be available later this week. I will pick up a copy and deliver it to your office noting thereon any comments which are .of concern. It is often possible to secure staff modification of position prior to the public hearing. You will also find enclosed the July 9th revision of the flow chart. Blalock has confirmed City Council action, usually requiring 4 weeks (advertising, referral to Ways and Means, first ordinance reading, second ordinance reading) is a requirement for both preliminary and final plat approvals. We are clearly faced with BIHC having suffered a 60 day delay (May 13th to July 15th) which it could not have anticipated (due to action of Attorney General ) and with the City Attorney and Planning Director in agreement that we are now simply trying to satisfy a procedural requirement on which there has been no public controversy and on which none is 'anticipated. Given these circumstances we need your services to Secure City Council consideration of preliminary and final plats at the same time. Since all plat improvements are already in place it would be practical for. the Council to do this if it elected. This would save putting the Council through the duplicate final plat approval process immediately following its preliminary plat approval . I have prepared the flow chart assuming you will be able to secure Hearing Examiner' s written report in 3 days (Blalock says Kaufman is prompt; often 5 days instead of full 15) and City Council ' s concurrent apprOval of both preliminary and final plats within 2 weeks of receipt from the Examiner. Even with this accomplished and your hand carrying the mylar as suggested by Gordon Ericksen, Mr. Kerry is faced with a 4 week lag from beginning of filling and Mr. Gary F. Faull July 9, 1980 Page 3 grading to first construction draw. Obviously he will need to make alternate arrangements for interim funds but this period must be held to the minimum. Thank you for your superb efforts and good result to date. Cordially, • James F. Stengel JFS:bgm Enclosure cc: Mr. H. E. Kerry, Jr. c i BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY CHRONOLOGY OF PLANT RELOCATION June, & July, 1979 BIHC became aware from public announcements that the Port of Tacoma was discussing site expansion for the Port' s tenant on the adjoining parcel which might require termination of the BIHC lease well prior to its expiration. BIHC began search for competent assistance in site analysis and evaluation and other necessary plant relocation services. August 9, 1979 Member of BIHC Board of Directors recommended BIHC consider services of Landsearch Corporation. August 10, 1979 BIHC initial inquiry to Landsearch Corporation. August 13, 1979 Initial discussions between BIHC and LSC re .BIHC need to relocate; site a'nd timing requirements; set meeting for August 22, 1979 to more fully develop site parameters. August 13, 1979 LSC initiated contact with other brokers seeking appropriate sites. August 17, 1979 LSC initiated contact with Burlington Northern and Union Pacific seeking appropriate sites. August 22, 1979 BIHC and LSC representatives met at BIHC plant to review existing site and facilities, to further define site ,requirements and to analyze prior year rail traffic. August 27, '1979 LSC forwarded to . BIHC for signature contract to cover work. September. 10, 1979 BIHC and LSC complete contract for all site analysis and acquisition. LSC (J. F. Stengel ) and BIHC (H. E. Kerry and W. G. Lightfoot) view Willock Property at Auburn. See Attachment for 12, additional sites researched and analyzed from September 10, 1979 through November 30, 1979. October 1, 1979 LSC review of Port of Tacoma/BIHC lease to confirm Port of Tacoma right to cancel , lead time required, etc. October 18, 1979 '. BIHC and LSC initiated architect/engineer selection for project. November 6 , 1979 BIHC initial meeting with Lance Mueller and Associates re project ; need for immediate site plan and early application to City of Renton for site plan and filling and grading approvals. December 13, 1979 BIHC initial meeting with lenders to work out financing for project. February 6, 1980 Lance Mueller and Associates files applications with City of Renton for site plan approval (SA-012-80) and filling and grading permit (SP-011-80). February & March, 1980 BIHC and Burlington, Northern complete documentation of purchase agreement including provision for Burlington Northern to have completed replat of Lot 7 to permit BIHC to close purchase and begin construction not later than June 30, 1980. April 1, 1980 Port of Tacoma gave formal written. notice to BIHC of cancellation asking BIHC to vacate by October 1, 1980. April 8, 1980 Burlington Northern filed short plat application SP-039-80. April 23, 1980 The City of Renton , Environmental Review Committee, reached final determination of declaration of nonsignificance for the application for site plan approval and application for fill and grade permit. April 24, 1980 Date of memorandum from City of Renton Attorney to City Planning Director enclosing copy of Attorney General Opinion re: subdivision of property previously long platted. May 6, 1980 Planning Staff recommended approval to the Hearing Examiner of the short plat application. May 13, 1980 The Hearing Examiner at his public hearing dismissed the application for short plat in view of the City Attorney' s memorandum of April 24, 1980. Planning Staff issues report to the Hearing Examiner recommending approval of a special permit for fill and grade on application SP-011-80 conditioned only on applicant not leaving unused fill on this or adjacent sites. Planning Staff issues report to the Hearing Examiner recommending written approval of a site plan on application SA-012-80 conditioned on the property being legally divided prior to issuance of a building permit. May 20, 1980 The Hearing Examiner at his public hearing on SP-011-80 and SA-012-80 continued both without prejudice in view of the City Attorney' s memorandum dated April 24, 1980. May 30, 1980 Gardner Engineers Inc. (Albert Hebrank) completed documentation for the long plat application and all paperwork was forwarded to St. Paul for action by the Burlington Northern. June 9, 1980 Burlington Northern filed with the City of Renton long plat application for Lot 7 as application PP-055-80. July 15, 1980 The Hearing Examiner' s public hearings on continued applications for filling, grading, and for site plan approval and on application for preliminary plat, all to be heard at the same time in an effort to hold loss of construction time to the 60. days already incurred between the originally scheduled May%3th and May 20th Hearing Examiner public hearings and those now scheduled July 15th, 1980. See Flow Chart revised July 9, 1980 for future dates. i.. • •• .l R I6 jut. v 1980 LEASE � �43�, ���v THIS LEASE entered into this / day of Aeteber, 1979, by and between DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY, a Washington corporation, (hereinafter called the Lessor) , and FIFTH i PARK PLACE CO. , a Washington corporation(hereinafter called the Lessee: W I T N E S S .E T Rs 1. That 'in consideration of the covenants and agree- ments of Lessee hereinafter oot' forth and of the sum of .:` , • now paid to •the Lessor by the Lessee, the said/Leaaor does by these present; lease and demise unto the said Lessee those cortain premises described as follows: • A. Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 8, REnton Farm Plat and South 140 feet of the Westerly 20 feet of Lots 10 thru 12, Block 2,. Sartorisville adjoining to the ®set. B. Lot 8, Block 8, REnton Farm Plat and Westerly 20 feet of Block 2 Sartorisville adjoining to the east. C. North 10 feet Lot 8and_al of 9, Block 10 on arm Plat except Street afid Alley :/) all in King County)_ as a ng .. • for a period of ten (10) years from November 1, 1979, to octobo . 31, 1989, at a monthly base rental be be adjusted as hereinafter provid-d, payable in advance on the first day Of each and every rental month during the full term of this lease. Any period of time between the execution of this lease and November 1, 1979, shall be paid for by the Lessee upon a pro-rats per diem basis so that the term of the lease will be ten plus years. During the period of time between the execution of the lease and the delivery of possession of Tract C to the Lessee, .the rental - -1- • . /74- cialb loom. 44' ((o eo 01.137.... shall be reduced to r . per month and will be increased to 111111111111 upon delivery of possession of said Tract C, which shall not be '-- _ later than mid-night December 31, 1979. 2. The Lessee shall have the right at its option and expense to demolish the residence situated upon Tract C. 3. That Lessee accepts and leases said premises for the term above stated and agrees to pay the rentals provided for in advance to DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY c/o Dobson, Houser s Dobson, 229 Williams Avenue.SGuth, P. O. Box 59, REnton, Washington 99055 or at such other place as Lessor may in writing designate. The above payment of . ' • ;1 'now made shall in the event of the full and faithful performance of all of the covenants and aagre :nts in this lease by said Lessee to be performed be credited in payment of the first month's rent and applied upon the last three month's rent of said term. 4. In addition to the monthly rentals provided for herein the Lessee shall pay prior to delinquency the real • estate taxes levied against the demised premises during the to ;.. of this lease or any extension thereto. In the event that the real estate tax statement covers other properties in addition • the leased properties, such taxes shall be pro-rated on the bas of the property subject to this lease as compared to those not .. subject to the lease. In addition the Lessee shall pay any loc., improvement district assessments becoming due during the term 0 , this lease. -2- • .6 aECEI`h � JUL '7 198° \V V�� nMONV . , pP S. On November let of each year of t �: .�, this lease the base rental of shall be adjusted in accordance with Cost of Living increases based upon the Consumer Price Index for Seattle, Washington, now issued by the Board of Labor G Statistics of United States Department of Labor and referred to as "Price Index Figure" )441. for the month of 4tk44 , 1979, and for the month of in the year in which such monthly base rent is adjusted effective on November let of that year. .. The adjustment in monthly rent shall be determined as follows: . . The price index figure i‘e( 61 1979, the price index.:figure for ) � ,(; . of the ear of ad ustment and the monthl rental of s e s s upon w 'c any a. us , ents shall be computed. The difference, if any, between the price index figure r 1979 and the price index figure for of the year of the adjustment shall be scertained by subtracting the lesser from the greater of such • figures. Thereafter such difference c 11 be divided by the price index figure for 1979 which will provide the percentage of change if any, in the price index figure. If such percentage of change represents an increase, then the monthly rent commencing November let of the year of the' ad justment shall for the next twelve (12) consecutive months be ' Y' plus the su \ . 4 It , • a ye aurm..pg111111111 by such percentage of change. In the event the Consumer Price Index issued by the United States Department of Labor be discontinued, or, if there is a substantial change in the method of determining the price index figure from 'the base month of 1979, any other appropriate and suitable Governmental Index shall be used providing it offers a comparison between a period reasonably close to 1979 and the subsequent month and year being measured. 6. Lessor hereby grants Aessee the right and option to extend this lease for an additional term of five (5) yA8rs -3- 10 Jul- etF• l� � P� NN (1 )-k\ 1NG DSe commencing November 1, 1989, conditioned upon tie following: (1) Written notice of Lessee's election to extend shall be given to Loasor not later than six (6) months prior to the expiration of this lease. (2) All the terms and conditions of this lease to be performed by Lessee shall have been performed promptly to the date of such notice. .(3) The rental during such extended period shall be as agreed upon between the Lessor and Lessee. In the event the- parties are unable to agreeupon a reasonable rent, it shall be submitted to arbitration. . Each party shall select an ,rbitrator and the arbitrators so selected shall select the third arbitrator. The decision of the arbitrators will be binding upon the parties hereto and the costs of the third arbitrator shall be shared equally by the parties. 7. First Right of REfusal. In the event that all terms and condition of this lease shall have been faithfully and promptly performed by Lessee, Lessee shall have the first i right of refusal on any sale negotiated by the Lessor during , the term of this lease or any extension thereof. Lessor shall\ submit to Lemma all of the terms of such proposed sale and Lessee shall have thirty (30) days in which to meet such terss® 1\,�. and purchao® the property. If the property is sold prior to the expiration of the original term Lessee's option to renew shall be terminated. If the },ale occurs after the exercise \1\ of the option for additional term, such additional term may at Lessor's; option be terminated upon thirty (30) days notice. Likewise, if Lessee is not in breach or default of:-this agroemen , (it) (they) shall have the right of first refusal to lease Lots • R il" tJ -t NI_ 7 198° B. 45/104 *1 •4, 5, 6 and 7, Block 8 REnton Farm Plat and ,�! rW.!:.p y 20 feet of Block 2 Sartorieville adjoining to the East when the present leases thereon terminate. However, this right shall not apply to the present tenants. 8. That the Lessee accepts said premises in their present condition and hereby covenants and agrees to keep them in good repair and safe condition. Any improvements to the realty shall upon the expiration or sooner termination of this lease be and remain the property of the Lessor. 9. UTILITIES. That ,the said Lessee covenants and agrees to pay all charges for utilities furnished to said premises during the term of this lease. 10. ACCIDENTS: That the said Lessee shall hold harml,se the Lessor and Lessor's agents from all damages of every kind and nature whatsoever that may be claimed or accrue by reason of any accident in or about the leased premises, or from the Leasee'e use or occupation' of the leased premises.and areas adjacent thereto, or caused by the acts or neglect of the Leese or any agent of the Lessee. It is agr =ed that neither the Leeaor, nor the Lessor's agents, shall be liable for the death of, or injury to, any person in or about the premises, or loss of, or damages to, any property of the Lessee, and the Lessor shall not be liable to the Lessee, or to any person, for claims arising from any defect in the construction or present conditio of the premises, whether known or unknown, or for damages by storms, rain or leakage. Lessee further agrees to carry ade- quate liability insurance in the principal amount of One Millie, Dollars $1,000,000.00) and to name Lessor as an additional insu .ed. • thereon. -5- rtgsck‘..)M-k) • 4 ��4� NNING DEVt. 11. CARE OF PREMISES: That the said Lessee shall • keep said leased premises clean and in a sanitary condition to the satisfaction of the Board of Health and Fire Department of the city or county having political jurisdiction, and its inspectors: and shall comply with each and all of th. statutes of the State of Washington and ordinances of the city or county in force or hereafter enacted: and shall keep the sidewalks surrounding the same free and. clear of ice, snow and any other obstructions, according to the ordinances of said city or count . ! 12. BUSINESS PURPOSES That the said Lessee shall not use said premises or .any part thereof for illegal purposes. 13. LIENS & INSOLVENCY: It is hereby agreed that . if the Lessee becomes either insolvent or bankrupt, or if a receiver is appointed, that the Lessor may cancel this lease at said Lessor's option. 14. ASSIGNMENT: That said Lessee shall not let or sub-let .the whole or any part of the leased premises nor assign thislease or any part thereof without the written consent of . : the Lessor nor shall this lease be assignable by operation of • law. 15. GOVERNMENTAL FEES: It is expressly understood and • agreed that the said Lessee shall during the term of this lease pay all fees due the City, County or State, on account of any inspection made on said leased premises by any officer of said City, County or State. 16. USABILITY: The Lessee has independently determine• the usability of the premises for the purpose for ,which it is hereby leased and Lessor makes no representation as to the legality of the Lessee's use of the premises. 17. CONDEMNATION: In the event of the taking of the demised premises herein by condemnation or otherwise by any • ,_ . . • , - \ c,c&,kb) vi.,\., . .. . • --_,,.-...: .........• __ ,.9,„ . . . : NI. I • .... , • •. . ,, .. q w '""""" - 070.0 •c- • ��NG Du-- governmental authority, this lease shall be deemed terminated as of the time of taking possession by ,said authority, and, if Lessee is not in default under any provisions of this lease on said dates the lease consideration herein receipted for, if any, shall be refunded to the Lessee, as well as rental ' . - • paid for any period beyond the date of cancellation. Les®es shall' have no claim to nor shall it be entitled to any portion of any award for damages to the land. • 18. HEIRS 6 SUCCESSORS: All the provisions of this ' lease shall be binding upon the. respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of Lessor and Lessee. ' 19. DEFAULT AND REENTRY: That if the said lessee • shall fail to keep and perform any of the covenants and agreemen's herein contained , then the said Lessor may cancel this lease • upon giving the notice required by law and re-enter said promise: , • but notwithstanding such re-entry by the Lessor the liability of the leases for the rent provided for herein shall not be extinguiahed for the balance of the term of this lease and .. - the Lessee covenants and agrees to make good to the Lessor any deficiency arising from a re-entry and re-letting of the premises at a lesser rental than herein agreed to. The Lessee shall pay such deficiency each month .as the amount hereof 3: A., =' is3_ascertained by the Lessor. 'Ai ' Xf :for any reason it becomes necessary for either 4AlitgAtt ..:.A140...:*pt,F . ny.reason• j�:1j8, t' r • ':4 't: �`f''`` ;`` ..to`'�'brg•.suit to enforce thelease .tt,�;�,�*a�;., i.;a:� ..4,y�,,;, terms of this then a��'��4��� k is; � �t, ; ,��qr,,.+.���, r. � ;_ . • A s', '°`4 l L � � j tossing _irty.•shall pay a reasonable attorney's fee and q&4 j `a alb:;costs n: ,expenses expended or incurred by the prevailing � '^ � I1C• :1:ti1• .•. n;,�'i,'• ?'4" •'....i4,1.;); 47: '- t; tt ia;°eorm ecti®n with such action. �l'+�3�,`i,". ) lay, 1;:°� S t. ,.4;,�t- `C v. ., .\..-_ i .` i ',_•.yA[.��:'';"S••}- �pd�,. i". :.`.,• , ., o'er. :1.— ';Z:i':'. - ,,',„1 ,:*•,:•41, :iiefk'4,;.•-.7 .,,•,....,,.,,,:iv.•-' .. . , �q ,: SC6)\' 0%437D t'ke 20. REMOVAL OF PROPERTY: In the event of any entry in, . or taking possession of, the demised premises as aforesaid,, the Lessor shall have the right but not the obligation, to remove from the demised premises all persona' property located therein and may place the same in storage at a public warehouse at the expense and risk of the owners thereof. . 21. NON-WAIVER OF BREACH: No waiver by Lessor of a breach by Lessee of any covenantSv agreements, stipulation or condition of this lease shall be- construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of the same covenant, agreement, stipulation or condition of this lease. 22. NOTICES: Any notice to he given to the Lessor shall be given to: DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY • c/o Dobson, Houser & Dobson P. O. box 59 Renton, Washington 98055 TO LESSEE: FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. 5S� - b-c�1 ! ' l��n , zuli.s��. . '180 SS" . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands ,and seals the day and year above written. LESSOR: LESSEE: DOBSON BUILDING COMPANY FIFTH & PARK PLACE C BY:president "vv BY: L ��f(-- Z9 rE dent�� BY: e. . BY: A . 0 4.4 ecr'eta y S r ary • -8- , / '/\ stab Clie.\\ -C3 1 10 t••6 .. '‘4;gt 1 e,4u q�,N1NG DEQP STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : SS. COUNTY OP RING ) On this p` O1? day of -t etobr, 1979, before me, the ' undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn personally appeared JOHN W. DOBSON and DAVID C. DOBSON, to me known to be the President and Secretary .' : respectively, of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the Said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the use and a purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they are authorised to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation.' WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. ?? /3lL. NotaryPublic in and for t ate of Washington residing at GUARANTEE WE, EUGENE HORAACH and JOYCE S. '13ORBACR, husband and • , wife, do each hereby guarantee individually and as a marital community the full and complete performance of all the terms and conditions required of the corporate Lessee named in the above and i foregoing Lease. • DATED this day of October, 1979.7,72.11-' ht,t_ X �( Mt/AA,' ,. -9- • ickeNbF U ADDENDUM TO LEASE DATED NOVEMBER 1, 979 v �'<� NG D WHEREAS, under date of November 1, 1979 DOBSON NG COMPANY, a Washington corporation, entered into a lease with FIFTH & PARK PLACE CO. , a Washington corporation, for certain properties in Block 8, Renton Farm Plat and Block 2, Sartoris- ville Addition to Renton, now therefore in 'consideration of the additional sum of '' T + per month, commencing .May 1, 1980, the Lessors add to the property covered by said lease the remaining portion of the Westerly 20 feet of Block 2, Sartorisville, Renton, Washington . The rental under the principal lease is then increased to N, commencing on said May 1, and all other terms and conditions of said lease shall remain in full force and effect. DATED this 23rd day of April, 1980. LESSOR LESSEE: DOB ON BUILDING COMPANY FIFTH & .PAR PLACE CO. BY. c Z�. ( ' resident President BY: - �f1 T �/ �• � ,_- BY: Q.. '� Ati4-4,14:/ Secretary eo etary GUARANTEE WE, EUGENE HORBACH and JOYCE S. HORBACH, husband and wife, do each hereby guarantee individually and as a marital community the full and complete performance of all the terms and conditions required of the corporate Lessee named in the above and foregoing Addendum to Lease. yi DATED this 23rd day of May, 1980. 511-41441-CL./1 ; f • • PLANNING G DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TB THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING JULY 15 , 1980 APPLICANT : GLACIER PARK COMPANY' FILE NUMBER : PP-055-80 A . SUMMARY & PURPOSE OF REQUEST: UEST: The applicant seeks preliminary approval for a two-lot replace of the Orillia Industrial Park - Phase I . B . GENERA.. INFORMATION: 1 . Owner of Record : GLACIER PARK COMPANY 2 . Applicant : GLACIER PARK COMPANY AND BRADY HARDWOOD ' S INC . 3 . Location : SE corner of Lind (Vicinity Map Attached) Ave . S .W. between S .W. 29th Street and S .W. 34th Street . 4. Legal Description : A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning Department . 5 . Size of Property : +8 .4 acres 6 . Access : Via S .W. 29th Street , and Lind Ave . S .W. 7 . Existing Zoning : M-P , Manufacturing Park 8 . Existing Zoning in the Area : M-P , Manufacturing Park 9 . Comprehensive Land Use Plan : Manufacturing Park 10 . Notification : The applicant was notified in writing of the hearing date . Notice was properly published in the Seattle Times on July 2 , 1980 , and posted in three places on or near the site as required by City Ordinance on July 3 , 1980 . C . T®RY/ AA(CKGRWUN!D : The subject site was annexed into the City of Renton by Ordinance 1745 of April 14, 1959 . It was rezoned from G to M-P by Ordinance 2533 on December 24, 2969 , and platted per final plat approved July 17 , 1978 . A lot line adjustment was approved between Lots 6 and 7 on November 1, 1979 , under LLA-020-79 which created the present configuration of Lot 7. On May 20 , 1980 , the Hearing Examiner dismissed the short plat application and required the filing of a preliminary plat application . PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GLACIER PARK CO . , . pP- 055-80 JULY 15, 1980 PAGE TWO D . PHYSICAL MACKCR®I Lfl : 1 . Topography : The site is essentially level . • 2 . Soils : Snohomish silt loam (So ) . Permeability is moderate in the upper part of the profile and moderately rapid in the lower part . Runoff is slow and the erosion hazard is slight . This soil is used for row crops , pasture , and hay . Much of the site has been filled as part of the Glacier Park Plat . 3 . Vegetation : Scrub grass and weeds are the only significant vegetation 4. Wildlife : The existing vegetation is not suitable for wildlife habitat . 5 . Water : No surface water was observed on the subject site (April 25, 1980 ) . 6 . Land Use : The subject site is undeveloped . Properties to the north and west remain undeveloped . To the east is the Superior Fast Freight storage and distribution center . Mercury Marine is beginning construction to the south. E . NEIGHBORHOID CHARACTERISTICS : The properties in the vicinity are experiencing transition from undeveloped land to commercial/industrial uses of light industrial nature . F . PUMLIC SERVICES : 1 . Water and Sewer : An existing 12" water main runs north-south along the E . Valley Road within 4 mile to the east of the subject site and a 12" main extends east-west within 4 mile to the north and a 24" main runs north-south along Lind Avenue . Along the E . Valley Road within 4 mile to the east of the site exists an 8" sanitary sewer which eventually become a 24" pipe . 2 . Fire Protection : Provided by the Renton Fire Dept . per ordinance requirements . 3 . Transit : Metro Transit Route #150 operates along SR-167 within 4 mile to the east of the subject site . 4. Schools : Not applicable . 5 . Recreation : Not applicable . G . APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF TIHIE ZONING CODE: 1 . Section 4-730, Manufacturing Park . H . APl LICAME SECTIONS OF TIHHE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR OTHER OFFICIAL CITY DOCUMENT: - 1 . 'Subdivision ordinance , Section 9-1106 .2 , Preliminary Plats . 2 . Green River Valley Comprehensive Plan , June , 1976. PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC HEARING : GLACIER PARK CO . , PP-055 -80 JULY 15 , 1980 PAGE THREE I . IMPACT OF THE NATURAL OR HUMAN MAN ENVIRONMENT : 1 . Natural Systems : Minor . 2 . Population/Employment : Minor . 3 . Schools : Not applicable . 4. Social : Not applicable. 5 . Traffic : No specific use has been proposed at this time ; therefore, specific impacts of traffic can be better, addressed at a later date. J . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the City of Renton ' s Environmental Ordinance and the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 , as amended , RCW 43-21C, a declaration of non-significance was issued for the subject proposal by the City ' s Environmental Review Committee on June 25, 1980 . K . AGENCIES/DEPARTMENTS CONTACTED : 1 . City of Renton Building Division 2 . City of Renton Engineering Division 3. City of Renton Traffic Engineering Division 4. City of Renton utilities Division 5 . City of Renton Fire Department L . PLANNING DEPARTMENT pANP,LYSIIS : 1 . The proposed plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations of Manufacturing Park for the site and surrounding areas . 2 . The proposal is compatible with the existing industrial warehouse development adjacent to the subject site . 3 . All public improvements were installed with the construction of the Burlington-Northern Orillia Industrial Park except for the sidewalk and the necessary curb cuts for the individual _projects . The specific location of fire hydrants will have to be modified as a result of the modification of the plat . 4 . On January 24, 1980 , the State Attorney General issued an opinion which concluded that a plat could not be short platted and that it must be replatted . A copy of that opinion is attached. M. DEPARTMENTAL RE(CCIMIMEND AT1I S : Based upon the above analysis, recommend approval of the preliminary plat request . 1. u ' '1' , RENr�1/v/, /,/Ng BOUNTY, WASH/NGTON i. . ::s �� "'.'-_-ith. Wit. s 88"^4,47„F 3._L' /4 . i '•T =55.00� off)ulsL 86.39 • • -- / arcl_I . i -, /86,�4 r,? cc! f.' h 1 cc•I in ,b 1 . t j ,--1 t ri f .---.1 ; E eu • • . . • C o in Parcel B ,cs l . . ti a /77,065 SQ. ft • i . • .377 2/ c P✓ 88`0958„1% 1 I ( 'p I — C.✓/ .i 4 111 St.. 1 i o,. V, A REPLA T 0 T 71 3LOCW, EURLINGTON WERN ORILLA INDU5TRML PARK OF RENTON DIV I SEC 30, r23N,P5E, ;Ylf 1-aA�T IN I-]- I L t IT IL I APPROVALS ;9;A, 1021" I 7;4. .,,.y A, LFGAL DESCRIPTION A.: w� :A� 4t, I A, ;No DICATION A ':f,CAd T-15 T'LAT :,p .w"-At., .,Z At �]D—41 AW�V%INIP AtI-1 LZT,OR LcTs, PIA$'v LE e k—1 f'�vF`PXLER'S UN' III.Att jj,jL',. L, "I 1�IT nI­"`­` -W T, L -1�1, A� IF ­9 �11-1 I �IIAIW.t ItAkt;'�11.1 L I. A." I-. TLT 14:—A GLACIER PARK CM'PW,Y Tq PIE 4�1 1111.1 F, A-341cnl S#CT9?wy""--- 4TZ 07 i,j -'t L! ACKNOWLEDGMENT M.1411NIfSDTA RAMSEY N.Is W-a. �A,zo. Itz�i W'11-,A'CTAI, v -At APL:F.A.Drul"a,Aj=Uc� GI 4,1 "P, E To.1 '1 T,f �Ckl,,-,1TjjN r-tL. w A;i 7, A 14 AT 14 �-!�)F �A �-A:1'.. 7- �1 OIL WTI',7,411� T,;.t �w- I— IIA LAND SURWYCPS :4. 71L'74 t-k: CEPTIFICATF -Tic ID' 91,j 1, 4z,wa If.IIIA. �,L, A;.r-Lu I..s.. 4--q IRMI I I "sl:1 11-t,x,wj;%! -KAT TIIE A%j DI AS.E, W A%�TO.VIT COqi11.1 1'.1tP11.11 TILL, AID T T I HAV 0'CI HA 4, I Lift— -ni I I r4 I"- I if Nq r lfl-�-If NTT!%' WA L%1 A, -L;, IN 41, 11,E 5�'.It F EtZ)YA Tlm tn M.-P., A RESTRiCTIONS 71- c --I:fk �;"'W 1F,r-y tt,-F4-.T� �-r!T�r,,. I-:.l,.-c",�— A:4�At. IT 'I", % f, I�C-�A AT.1 0:'.-'A:IL TIES REa)RDjNG 4'Q, T:Z; W CERT16CATL "I I NIL I"I:--' A,V E�I, r,) kICIS I'LL.11. A, "'I IN, I I'.- Ifw- iI -IrED T:) 5;1CLXILi,1�7 WT�I WTI, Oc—R 1,-, AT ;A�T 107'. t-I.- 4V., c1c 1fQA-1 �-Il At', kcAs-11 17-11 11cc RL' 1. 1, AIZ) VLFIAII�&L�l NA?S"'TVI�A"IL-JnttQ I�CILI!Irs-Y L,-LAC!1 C`IW-1. 17 5"CLISNS'0--[W. ;,——CIECT11J,Sl.*—5z 'JR`�' T`'I'LLIFICATKY-S:)I '"LIP �,VCLV--�41, ILI U 11f 51 EtIll A4%1 L,�,A, .):-f 1 5 VC EI'V.5E. 7 :tt, Z'.VGhVEF,1?S, hVC. Swrle,Wos,1,,V,1v; SHEET 2'. 4 N ;4 'kL',Tj I V AA,,A, F It M? A: A W, I, IN 4 Aw It. Mvfk- 1)z wfiK W,�0&� r6 V 7r t�w. ki* ;t aj IV U WA-Z 0, k e� V.4*i;�*N A PC Cr,! A' ?A C6 ----------- RA` :�� 112.0 61131 ® Plannin ,. 12-1979 «4 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : PI, p . . _ .... .,0f :1.,,, 7 ., ; c # , ..i. # 7 -;-,; , 4,, ,', :.,, t,„, ,:,' lir. , ..41 •: 0', ,,,,, : , Location :4 side dlino! Aw.SWiehtec,. jj1J)1' .5 r.f 3' �/ ' Applicant: �c6�r �rk(o TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : 7f11/ Police Department A. R.C. MEETING 'DATE : 7/ /Ai Public Works Department 611919i Engineering Division T ffic Engineering Building Division /1/f Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN FO THE APPLICATION R CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 701 3 if® AT 9EVEW:UO A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF 1 PARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PR VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P.M. ON 7 174g . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : v Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved • Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative na1a °Wei/ O Plannin? 12-1979 F RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. REVIEW SHEET Appli cation : T(PP ) Avhei efe Id `� Art O,'iI/'i$ ..7e04ate/ Poxr�� � ,. , 1 fc Location : 4*.Sid Isdupee ! e� App1 i cant : 6/c lifer rk(o, 9 TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : VSAPe �1. Police Department A, R, C, MEETING DATE : , *�,. , :10 fir t a 0 0 Public Works Department 6// /p ,gineering Division Traffic Engineering Building %ivision Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITIN FO THE APPLICATION REVIEW CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON + I D AT 9 :UU A.M. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YUU IMPARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE TO ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PROVIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P .M. ON 717496 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7/ Qc / � � � XC Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved 1) ( - a Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ,Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6413/80 Planni 12-197 RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Application : a LIM) M -Y PLAT( P � C� 1 64 / � 6Y�) , 811C I at Orelf w' elii 0 Op Location : . : % rl�eif P.SWZe .# gr.. . W App l i cant : 6lofftrr Arke0 , if TO: Parks Department SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : VW Police Department A. R.C. MEETING DATE : ;�� ,�. ': '. Public °Irks Department . ;4,C. 611e/94 Engineering Division Traffic Engineering Building Division Utilities Engineering Fire Department (Other) : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITINGF THE APPLICATION REVIEW, CONFERENCE (ARC) TO BE HELD ON 71 g) AT 9: U A. TM. IN THE THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM. IF YOURARTMENT/DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE WILL NOT ABLE ATTEND THE ARC, PLEASE PR VIDE THE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BY 5:OU P .M. ON 7/XI REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : e7:) 1,... 4...enill K Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved ,, .�-� c:,_ L.._ , /Arkb Signature of Dire for or Auth�ried Representative Date REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : Approved Approved with Conditions Not Approved Signature of Director or Authorized Renrecpntativo n +., • FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No(s) : ` FIKTO5-5-'13tI Environmental Checklist No : ECF-576-80 Description of Proposal : Replat of an existing lot into 2 lots. Proponent : .-,...Gt^A `I' 'It ':P, R Y"m:CO Location of Proposal : East side of Lind Avenue S.W. between S.W. 29th Street and S.W. 34th Street Lead Agency : PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on June 18, 1980 following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department . No oral comments were made. ' Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on ,application ECF..576-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by : Steve Munson, Assistant Planner, dated June 18, 1980 . 2) Applications: PP-055-80 1 3) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Moved by Gordon Y. Ericksen, seconded by John E. Webley a declaration of non-significance be issued; all concurred. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance: Project had no adverse impacts. Signatures : ,..,..4.. _ F o 2ihn E . WebZ.' Parks Director op on . E ' ate- ,' Planning J D ''rector g Wa en C. Gonnason, Director Public Works Department DATE OF PUBLICATION : June 25, 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD :_ July 9, 1980 • • idi) . -- 0 i Zr R1( ri: . . • .I. 4,4,) IN CO'..: ie..Aa:u: ;.i:1J S A. ASSOCIATION G: 1; ::1:.:1L J CITIES 440 O OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY• RENTON,WASHINGTON .- = 2 ,g. -•�may= OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL �"iL `' _ COST OFF,C[tMR 676 1O0 3,b AYlNUE pu D G • RENTON,WASHINGTON 9.055 t]]-•bT• -, 3 �.C. o ! E $ LAWRENCE I.WARREN,CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY V. 7.. '1 4 SLADE GORTON ATTORNEY GENERAL • O _ r^- � r.; TEMPLE OF JUSTICE OLYMPIA,WASHINGTON 08504 �°o rP� April 24, 1980 : ,� .,\ /� AJ�GO ✓` (tSt10c%'Jaat°vs LJt•/:tyv t 5,v_t�ct[J•J,Out ft TO: Gordon Ericksen, Planning Director • ( .t FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney ?` �� t -. RE: Re-subdivision of Property previously long platted \• - rc"��.• J t � --� ----`� - -t l\6�z,* Dear Gordon: ;tif C , You will find attached hereto an Attorney General's Opinion �! L.- -;,� • dealing with the above topic. There is also a discussion in / - l.4a► i the Opinion of various other methods of re-subdivision with : ,i ,t1 C discussions of the legal methods for doing each of the ways -/ - ::. of subdividing. I am not sure whether you have had this �-.-r information previously and pass it along for your erusal. r� CX22.4_43-Gtall. ,(Z.v_ - . . 1.1.:: , . T, I, Lawrence J. Warren ra ', : - of cc: Mayor �%r...1 -, 4e41'"' k �`' ,- - Council President c --: Sketch of the Temple of Justice aggEo N ff by Carolyn Feasey of Cathlamet U D APR 1 4 1980 t'JAcpEN&KELI QGG By-_ OPINIONS F •R JANUARY thru MARCH 1980 • U.'!':CF:(32,•Z•t{E li19.OHNNY GF:NF:HAL I i ' - '*.`, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Honorable HenryR.aa Y Dunn -2- s:Pt .-:- s, SLADE GORTON ATTORNEY AGO 1980 No. 5 ...... ..11 f�',.- T6M1'IJi OF JUSTICE U1.VMi'IA. WAti111N GENERAL 98594 • .& r, (2) If the answer to Question No. 1 is the negative, would such action constitute, instead, a .res COUNTIES--CITIES AND TOWNS--PLATTING AND SUBDIVISION-- 58.17 RCW as a "subdivisubdivision' RESUBDIVISION OF LOT WITHIN EXISTING SUBDIVISIONan hus be sub- • ject tq —t��ge eral rovisions o c ag�i ptr"subdivision Where, within an existing land subdivision established pursuant to either chapter 58.16 or 58,17 RCW, the owner / We answer,your first question in the negative and of an individual lotproposes ( your second question—in--tt{_A_ fictive,-fait-Or-fewer siridller gfore�vide that lot�into - 1 lease, such action will not constitute purpose the establishment • - - - -ANALYSIS ' of a "sorts division" as defined in RCW establishment 58.17 020(6) and, thereby, be subject to the city or county's short Chapter 58.17 RCW codifies the subdivision ordinance as enacted 271,platting of 1969, 1st Ex. provisions of chapter pursuant to RCW 58.17.060; to Plaaws and Sess•, as amended, and relates instead, such action will constitute a "resubdivision" -andg the formation of subdivisions. hus be subject to the general provisions of chapt e� 7 RCW, in turn, contained the predecessor to Chapter 58.16 RCW relating o su zvisi Platting law. this 1969 state Your questions assume the existence of a land lion earlier established pursuant to one or the other uofivi- • those two chapters. And, as we view it, it makes no differ- ence which law was initially utilized. The issue, in either • • event, involves the proper legal characterization to be a p- • January 24, 1980 plied to the subsequent action b individual lot w> by the current owner eofs an . • • sn the subdivision who now proposes " Honorable Henry R. Dunn • to divide that lot into four or less smaller lots for the Prosecuting Attorney • Pose of sale or lease, . " pur_ Cowlitz County . 312 South First Avenue West Clearly; any such action now taken bythe Kelso, Washington 98626 Cite as: • • parcel of real property will be governed by owner of a of AGO 1as:980 No. 5 chapter 58.17 RCW simply because that is thel provisions effect Dear Sir: with regard to plats and subdivisions, the law now .in effect 7, a copy of which is enclosed. The Accord,s ueLsue to be et. • • mined will readily be seen upon examination eofsthe following By letter previously acknowledged you requested the two definitions from RAW 58.17.020: opinion of this office on two questions which we have para- phrased as follows: (1) Where, within an existing land subdivision "(to 'Subdivision' is the division ce land or58.17pursuant to either chapter 58.16 into five or more loss, ofestablished RCW, the owner of an individual lot tracts, parcels, proposes to divide that lot into four or fewer sites or divisions for the purpose of sale \1 smaller lots for the /or lease and shall include all resubdivision • Purpose of sale or lease, of land. 1 will such action constitute the establishment ot a 'short subdivision" as defined in RCW " • 58.17.020(6) and, thereby, be subject to the of city or county's short subdivision ordinance as enacted pursuant to CW 5 6or "(6) 'Short subdivision' is the division el iland into four or less lots, tracts, parcels, sites or'subdivisions for the purpose of sale or lease. • (Emphasis supplied) • • Honorable Henry R. Dunn OFFICE ut"►•!IEA•ITORNtrc:ENE►tAL -3_ AGO 1980 No. 5 • Also to be noted is RCW 58.17.030 which provides that: Honorable Henry R. Dunn -q- v/ AGO 1980 No. 5 1( provisions ofchapter.comply Everywith short ll` subdivision as defined in this chapter Such regulations shall be adopted by ordinance and may contain wholly differ- /shall comply with the provisions of any ent requirements than those local regulation adopted pursuant to RCW the approvalgoverning local 060." of preliminary and final plats of subdivisions and may require • • surveys and monumentations and shall Therefore, the proposed action described in your require filing letter will be , eed eitherps by ofs a'fhtht plat for dire- chapter 58.17 RCW itself-- tor: in the office of the county audi- if that action is deemed to be a "resubdivision of land" tor: PROVIDED, That such regulations within the meaning of RCW 58.17.020(1), supra--or, must contain . tively, it be by alterna- tively, a requirement that land in subdivision • iv , twilllibence if coveredt s heemedliinsteadountyashort to short id d niiman er not furtherp the establishment of a new "shortinofvfve any mahout the filing ageofoda ' • subdivision" as defined in finalof five at: withoutV FURTHER, That of a RCW 5provid20(6),follows: l/ In this latter regard, RCW 58.17- plat:` PROVIDED FURTHER, .060 provides as follows: such regulations are not required to - • contain a penalty clause as provided in "The legislative body of a city, town, or inj injunctive 36.32.120 and may • county shall adopt regulations and injunctive relief." provide for wholly dures, and appoint administrative personnel for the summary approval of short plats and • short subdivisions, or revision thereof. • • • The issue thus crystalized is one which has never been addressed directly by any appellate court in this state or in any official opinion of this office; .i.e., which "law," chapter 58.17 RCW or the applicable local s ort subdivision 1/ In order to be certain that the understood your questions, ordinance, governs the further division of an individual lot we wrote, following receipt of your initial request, and asked situated within an existing subdivision or short subdivision? you: In the following three instances, the answer seems "Is your true concern only with the proposed clear: further division of a particular lot within a • . ein a -- (1) Where the further division of an individual lot previously established subdivision (as fied by the attached rough drawing of a hypo- occurs within an existing short subdivision quiringthetical subdivision) or, instead, are you in- RCWe 58.17.020(6), supra) wit in five years of atheecreatioin n in amending athetexistingtheclotres boundariesto beollowed e within th thereof: entire subdivision?" RCW 50.17.060, supra, in dealing with the content of 0 a county or city's short subdivision regulations, contains In response, by return letter, you advised us as fol- the following stipulation: lows: " . our concern at this point is only with ". PROVIDED, That such regulations must the.resubdivision of lots within previously contain a requirement that land in short established subdivisions and does not include subdivisions may not be further divided in amending lot boundaries so long as no addi- any manner within a period of five years tional lots are created by the amendment." without the filing of a final plat: ," • -y, .. -.. _'. -- . OFFICE:OF'TIILf ATTORNEY GENERAL .. Honorable Henry R. Dunn -5 AGO 1980 No. 5 Honorable Henry R. Dunn • • • O 1980 No. 5 { -6 AG Thus, any further division of land within a short subdivision will necessitate the filing of a full "final But what if, instead (as stipulated in we have the following situation: Your questions), plat"_ if it occurs within five years of creation of • the particular short subdivision regardless of the hum-of 'new' lots subdivision, (a) The lot being further dividedlse is situatedua within an existing full subdivision established pursuant to either (2) Where the further division of an individul .lot chapter 58.16 or 58.17 RCW; and occurs within either a subdivision or a short subdivisionC575 ) at any time and it is (b) The proposal is to divide that lot into four.or or more "new" lots: proposed to divide that lot into five less lots for the purpose 'of sale or resale? i But for the last seven words in the definition of "sub- Likewise, even after this five-year • �i the further land division will still be period has run, division" in RCW 58:'17.020(l), su ra 3 i\ generalchapter governed by the this question would seem_to have been fairly answer to even short subdivisions regulations, iflitRis,deesdgned t not o produce cause the "action" inon Y apparent. Be- five more new lots within the confines of-the existing - • within the definition ofeat"shor thsubdivision" as set fortb-iwould; in. that case, have n five oring divided. Accord, the definition of "subdivision" RCW sion",020(6), su ra, and not the definition of the "sub_ in RCW ng58 di 020 1 division" in subsection (1) of the same statute, the applicable ( ), supra, and see also, AGLJ 1974 No. 7 "law" would have been that contained in the short subdivision and AGO 57-58 No. 88 Tcopies enclosed) to the effect that subdivision regulations-of the county or city involved.rather than the the term 'land" must be deemed to include previously platted land or single lots as well as undeveloped, unplatted lands, general provisions of chapter 58.17 RCW. ' Moreover,oer, this be so, by regardless - woreove the is willllnb divided, y definition,is within a fullg subdivision ofion - itself, a'ving, ofu course,n haved been' helpfulrfe if the legislature, ex- or. short subdivision. having thus instead added the reference riot" to its division termof a "subdivision to "r ette vi- • • • ' (3) WZhere the further division occurs within a short Pressly defined that as well. Cf_'� had then latex ex_ subdivision more than five years after its creation and it opinion of August 28 , our earlier letter oponion o August' co 1973, to then State Representative ' is proposed to divide the individual lot in do so and tSawyerr es enclosed. But. the legislature did not four or less "new" lots: question into present task is to glean its intent from what, in fact, it said. Gra££e]] v. Honeysuckle In this instance the apparent192 P.2d 858 (1948) and cases cite there in; 30 Wn.2d.390, . from RCW this instance supra, is inference to be drawn • division regulation ofthe or e city question' short sub- - govesn--because the five-year county questiop will • • / ill have ended. period covered by the proviso meaningless. Otherwise, that proviso will be virtually • • 3/ Here repeated for ease of reference • 2/ Defined in P.CW. 58.17.020 as, "• . . the final drawing of the subdivisionas follows: and dedication prepared for filing "(1) `Subdivision° is the division of land into five or cord with the county auditor andcontairing for re- an more lots, tracts, parcels, sites all elements and requirements set forth in or divisions for the purpose of sale or lease % this chapter and in local regulations adopted EmPd sh all include all resubdivision of land." pursuant to this chapter." iris rope 1e --- --- -_-^ `=-:-, T�-._�.,•a;�....,�.�-.. UFF;tc OF.T}i1;A7�)4N y UI•:NLItAL • r . 01•1,K:11 UI•"fill;NITORNEY UHNEHAL • • Honorable Henry R. Dunn _8• AGO 1980 No. 5 Honorable Henry R. Dunn -7- or AGO 1980 No. 5 (Instant question of how the - division iii:glotitg s within anexistingdfulllsubdon wouldfberreq• In so doing we must also bear in mind the The nswer, inturn, to that question wasea- that all parts of a statute must be construed t Principleb provisotopin58.17.06ch we earlieran organic its o, and no part should be read of gither of as- t page 4 ogthis opinion. But it semstoeus at leasttext or ignored. State v. Houck, 32 Wn.2d 681, 203 P.2d 693 le to assume that the drafters of SbsttuteSenate(1949). Thus, no clause, sentence or word should be consid- 169 simply felt that they had feredered superfluous, void or insignificant. Groves v. Meyers, ant problem by their further referece akencare of • 35 Wn.2d.403, 213 P.2d 483 (1950). Moreover, a court will the definition of what constitutes tO "resubdivi- riot place a narrow, literal or technical construction on only in what is now RCW 58.17.020(1), su ra, a subdivision, _� i.e., part of a statute and ignore other relevant parts. In Re Cress, 13 7, 123 P.2d 767o (1942).rAnd finally, to the - IWINW2g; apn extent that the language of an act is ambiguous or uncertain, / "resubr d appe Din°oe that while the term • resort is to be made to certain judiciallyapprovedj chap terid a Dert ar ur "old platting law, statutory construction including,cera aids to chapterrafted at the time what is now • act in question and the evils that itwashdesignede ytofremedy. the word "subdivision." See,�NaJ•ShAe•New Jersey definition of State ex rel. Bugge v. Martin, 38 Wn.2d 834, 232 P.2d 833 pealed)the which then read, in material.part, 1,2 (since re- , tate , as follows: "'Subdivision' means the•division of a lot Unquestionably, the framers of our new (1969) state plat- tract, or parcel of land into two or ting law were quite concerned with what were felt to be weak- the lot p sites or other' of future, • nesses in the prior law as it related (or, more properly, did the purpose, whether immediate or future, not relate) either to the initial division of land into four or of sale or building developments; , - e- less lots or to the further division of an individual lot in an anddwhere°a also includes thecontext,the e.g,, the discussion relating to Substitute Senate Bill No. 169 lates-to process of subdividing or tobetween Representatives Chapin and Moon which is reported on the lands or territory divided." page 1643 of the 1969 Journal of the House of Representatives and, also, the later discussion between the same two legislators 47 N.J. d� in Lake,Intervale Homes v,on the free conference version of the bill at page 1777 of the Super, A. publication, Hill, House Journal. In fact, the particular concern which was•dis the only case reported in the legal(1y w lc aPPens to cussed on both occasions was, specifically, that of the further phrases" for the meaningof Publication, "Words and ' division of land within a "short subdivision" rather than the New Jersey Court had earlier observed word resubdivision, the observed as follows: "'Subdivision' is defined by N,J.S.A. • 40:55-1.2 as 'the division of a lot,• tract, or parcel of land into two or • more lots, sites or other divisions of land• for the purpose, whether idiate - or future, of sale or building elop- Thetke and includes resubdivis ' 4/ Chapter 58.16 RCW simply did not deal at all with the Y word is division. • creation of what we now refer to as a "short subdivision;" ' Reisdi:miubol.01_17inve ivi- i.e., the division of land into four or less lots for the sion can onl mean a further dif a lvlsion reviously ma e . purpose of sale or lease. Instead, that prior law only Erie asis supp ie - governed the division of land into five or more lots and was silent on the omitted area of activity, leaving the regulation thereof entirely up to the various counties and cities under the general authority, as set forth in RCW 35.63.080, to • . regulate and restrict . things] the subdivision and development of land•. (am othere , AGO 57-58 No. 88, supra. ." See, I Oi*rt:E OF THE AA'd'o! -..U.::C:i•'TriE hiiOa?ti:Y C.r:NEEthL • • • - • Dunn -10- Honorable Henryonorable Henry R.yR. Dunn _g_ AGO 1980 AGO 1980 No, 5 No. 5 It seems to us quiteWe trust that the foregoing will be of assistance between RCW thus possible that.the si' you. bet eenn" 17.020(1), supra, and the definition ofl'su - to in Li.J,S.A. 40:55-1.2, supra, "sub- . dental. P is more than coinci- • Very truly yours, Finally, we note the further word E 47/41, SLAD ORTON lineak of our definition, "all" in the At r subdivision" Under RCW 58.17.020(1), the termst � ey General includes all resubdivision of y exception, apparently, is. (for the reasons above expThe lained), a further division into four or less lots of a lot within d short subdivision more than fivey PHILIP H. But unless, in everyYears after itsn.. 4::,/,./4.. ,„!' IN definition other instance, that creation, 7sDeputy ttorney General means that any further divisionloft IldProfe our divided is also to be deemed a subdivision landthe definition will be Previously �� G the fini seen, in the final analysis, of Y meaning at all.without toy meaning a And that, obviously, to be `OBERT P. TA' do as— abovet stg d ibable principles of statutory would be Senior Assistant Attorney Y construe mg Generalonclu--Conclusion: \ • _ Enc. 3 °�sequentiy,in direct answer to your it is our opinion that the further division ofwa lot,within • an existingquestions, _ • plat or subdivision, whether established /ant to chapter 58.16 or chapter . "resubdivision" within 58.17 RCW, Pursu- / Such action therefore must thus meanlcompl ng of R �17t020(1),itutes asti ra, ./chapter 58.17 new relatingy with the • _the number of to "subdivision," regardless o • ?(/ _new lots_arhich result from the r•`9a=dless of Eahe nurefore answer your first the action In your second question in the 4uestion. question in tiT—e- affirmative:}- - negative and 5/ In so concluding • the law in we recognize that, some ten Thlquestion was first enacted, a -lac after uniformity among the various thered is a • ark ua practice throughout the local jurisdictions lack of uniformity state. In fact, in actual . y which prompted your instanttis that apparent in the first place. The state legislature, e again session and remainsPinion request - ag wen inve not free to clarify however, is intent, in er lettery sufficiently tly done so, doing its own re August 28, by what we recommended • tative Sawyer, supra; namely, • 1973, to then State Rep resen- tative expressly definingpTesen- the word '..! 1 e'i': dLI. ..; I - . i1.'' -, { 77.:r :ir'' - _cu `` i'r 4- 'r4'+ - 7 •..�...:'•rat. -':.-COUNTIES--CITIES'AND TOWNS--BUILDING--FIRE--PLATTING AND •DISTRICTS--PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT AREA--ELECTIONS-- • SUBDIVISIONS--COMPLIANCE•WITH:ACCESS•.REQUIREMENTS OF " • J PROCEDURE'FOR.'DISSOLUTION D -UNIFORM;FIRE.CODE '1'-' Ji;� The provisions _ - ��. .'�� r vi oas'of RCW.36.57A 1- - - ,.r; P 60'constitute the exclusive . cEx Explanation the interrelationshi' between § 13:208 of Y. - means•by:•which•-a-public transportation benefit area esta- P P blished:pursuant to-cha ter 36.57A.RCN,ma •. ;the Uniform Fire Code; 1976 Edition; and.;the platting of '• _•:',.: ::;: : _-_ . , r� P y.be dissolved. • •: `'subdivisio s or short subdivisIons.under chapter 58.17 - •••' -• r'�•::•:.::••.;•,a-...... ,._, n P AGLO 1980 No. -4' _•. Vrooman • ` :RCW and/or:.a local•.short subdivision:ordinance; consider= _ Jerry - - .-State.Re-resentative - •'• ation of'-the respective roles,of the on inal subdivider . . : `.`,:.-.i. P subsequentchasers�.of'buildin� `.lots in-achievin �fv'�= • January..21;:t..1980 _ =and - ur g 4 P ::>-' .. r . � 7 • e N r ire n of� 3 8 of - - ss e u m ts: 1 .20 ``>'w'a withthe ac e com li nce c �" ter. - = UniformFirede - _ - _ - - Co the - " . _ ...... ..-a- • � - ..-. .K.._,.. • :.._ .. ...-.'.. . .•-a�,::••:•'.:..::}:..'.:.ti is�', • ..... . . - 1 ...-,.•....::.. t...r•'; -s; - - - -- -- EPARTMENT:OF;LABOR-AND - . : .: :.AGLO 1980 Ro.:.1..,:=; _-.:._... Carol,Monohon:: ::...;:,!. ::::'.a- ..:-.r.,, •_.-':'.r..•. ICES''AND`OFFICERS STATE ' D - '= :nt-•.'• '' '•' , :,'_";,_.=_,':.._.3::..-,�: -,,.,.. :,: .�-,.��: :State•,Representative._--•,:_:� _:= : ,.:•_;,.,...:,,,...-;,.,..,..;;„:. - • USTRIES--ENERGY FACILITY SITE'EVALUATION COUNCIL:- ' '�-:� ...,::r:.. ....,...,..,_.. . ,. . .... r.:.,,._.,?..._rt.- - _ :".:-,,,,-..INSPECTION --__:_.-• :-:: -;�-t ,.z;:.<;:,.;._ �_•-. •- ;. ;,{�;.., OF CERTIFICATED ENERGY:FACII,IT Januar .9 �-1980 "• .f. S b e er'R th CW 5 2. 8U: 0.1 U nor an othe- s••c• e i- ton Hof:chapter- =r-. Y '1:' %; 'ts' -'8 0:50 •RCi9� i es..tv. =;• eclud th e e'St D' ate ar e e tm nt'.o 'Labor f h r �• ..:� P o and _I d s- _ n u ie tr s:-fro and c m•c u ti s�'_� ' _ - g p c o ,!.pursuant;�to chap- - » FPICES"AND}•OFPZCERS--COUNTY--CLERK--BONDS-. ..rLECTIONS - P P^• . • ,...FAILURE OF"ELECTED COUNTY, CLERK.'TO EXECUTE',OFFICIAL'BOND -' _' •ters.19 28,�`70 79*.arid 70.87.RCW;'•'of an' energy facility _ ._. _ , ._.,. =•r :-:: <,-. ;`='_ , bycertification agreement duly' •energy in ac- *r`-:. .i; .. nce::withcthat:chapter:.*.: =.The failure of**a newlyelected_county.clerk•to'•execute and • aver • "' is bondpursuant.to RCW 36.16.050 does not ' furnish an.offic 1 ;„ s RCW • • AGLo.1980 No. :5:` ;'`: '.. King Lysen �•. `-:cause a-vacancy in the office .to exist pursuant. to �_ _ • - .,'�,;,:;•::: , .:'.�.:': :;�: - '- "42.12.010;instead, such omission merely bars the newly- • • '%' �, ''r' State Senator • clerk-from qualifying and,-thus; continues the term ,:':-?^ r i'-- :'' January'21,.1980 •electedr Y g . • of his or her predecessor who, however, may, by resigning or • to serve cause a vacancyto come into existence. —refusing. �. :. AGLO 1980:No. 2. James .E. Carty,' Prosecuting Attorney S .', -OFFICES:AND:OFFICERS--STATE--COUNCIL FOR POSTSECONDARY . .., =i-.EDUCATION--HIGHER EDUCATION--REGISTRATION OF SECTARIAN Clark unty :._:.'. INSTITUTIONS .':.'Jan = • .::. .The Council:for.Postsecondary,Education, in the exercise FERRIES--INSURANCE EMPLOYEES-^STATE-FUNDED INSURANCE •. of._its authority to:.suspend or modify the requirements of • .:':'the Educational Services Registration Act of 1979 on the COVERAGE FOR STATE FERRY. SYSTEM,EMPLOYEES' .. ,. , basis of;hardship pursuant to RCt'J 28B.05.130, may not . ..•' exempt.:en_ °educational institution" from otherwise required -`(1) Employees of the WashingtonctiofState FterEmployeem are '.' registration•solely because of its sectarian religious • subject to the jurisdiction of the State Employees Incur- . ' 9 ance Board under chapter 41.05 RCW with respect to the de- ownership, management or curricula. sign of such employer-funded insurance. coverage as they • ": receive from the state. - AGLO 1980 No. 6 ' • C. Gail Norris . Executive Coordinator (2) The employer's contribution of the Washington Depart- • :: Council for Postsecondary Education ment of Transportation under RCW 41.05.050(2) is not, in _ January 22, 1980 ' • ' the case of ferry system employees, limited to that which • • . . the State Employees Insurance Board sets as the employer's • : contribution for state agencies generally. .. . ' . AGLO 1980 No. 3 Leonard Nord, Director • Department of Personnel - • • • January 14, 1980 - ; • '1"i•- • • • -•:.;57‘'‘'','`;-;•:. ;•••• •••::.A :•••• ' '• ,3••••••-n": • • ;• DISTRICTS--SCHOOLS--HEALTH-"-IMMUNIZATION--CHURCHES--Y • . RELIGION--FUNDING CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS OF . • •. •CHURCH-RELATED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ' ' • . • •• • • ••- •• • • •••.'Funds appropriated by 5 14 and 15 of chapter 118, Laws .• ' ' ' • • -of 1979, 1st Ex. Sess., .for administration of the manda- ..tory school immunization program thereby established may 1 • ... not be disbursed to private, church-related schools ' •,;. (a)-'becauSe•of a•lack•ofstatutorY.authority and (b) be- • -,cause of-the Constitutional prohibitions in. Article IX, S '4 and Article.VIIIS7 of .the Washington. Constitution; :••the legislature, however,'.6ould.make certain Suggested :I.a.mendments'to,the'qaw:which,',if:eniated;:wOuld establish I. a;:bonstitutionally permissible contractual basis for suchpayments • ' State Representative :••••,• . ;'••••• • •".•" •:; • ;".;; • • .. OFFICES AND OFFICERS -STATE--DEPARTNENT:OF GAME--APPRO-' '-..PRIATIONS-'7EFFECT OF APPROPRIATIONS TO PAY LEGAL COSTS ' • • ::.ASSOCIATED WITH CERTAIN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT LITIGATION • - " • •• • • Analysis and discussion of the effect of so much of § 90, . chapter.270, Laws of 1979, 1st Ex. Sees., as appropriated • • - •$42,000 from the State Game Fund to defray legal costs• . 4aSsociated'with'the construction and operation of a ' • •• ' regulating structure stabilizing the level of water in • AGLO 1980'No. 8 Ralph W. Larson, Director , - - • ' " Department of Game • . January 29, 1980• • . • • • • . • •••••••• • . • : •• • . .. . • • •• ..• •• • • • • • . . • • • • • • • Lobby 2, Central Building Seattle, Washington 98104 June 20 , 1980 Mr. Gordon Erickson Director of Planning City of Renton Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Application for Plat of Lot 7, Block 1 Burlington Northern • Orillia Industrial Park of Renton, Division 1 Dear Mr. Erickson: On April 1, 1980 , Glacier Park Company entered into a binding pur- chase agreement with H.E. Kerry,Jr. or Assigns to purchase the south 471 feet, as measured along the west line, of the above refer- enced property. H.E. Kerry, Jr. has notified Glacier Park Company that he and other principals of Brady International Hardwoods Company have formed Orillia Investors, a Washington partnership, to complete purchase of the south 731 feet of Lot 7 and to construct and own the improve- ments thereon which are to be leased to Brady International Hard- woods Company. This constitutes consent of Glacier Park Company for Orillia In- vestors to join as applicant on the Plat Application submitted to City of Renton on June 9 , 1980 , if City of Renton so desires. We enclose herewith Affidavits of Glacier Park Company to be incor- porated in Orillia Investors applications to City of Renton for site plan approval and for fill and grading permit. Yours truly, Glacier pinrk Company BY s , _xVIAL (. . Go() rdon By ://c _ Ne)/! C. Kretz Enclosures .. _.. - ... . ......a ....._... .,. v......a.,.ir1 11.1 .)i vm., AFFIDAVIT ,t_J_ [torr]Lan and >,lpi i r_ Kr .tares , Glacier Park Compan being duly sworn, declare that/' isan the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of ourrq knowledge and belief. Subscribed and sworn before me this , day of _ , 19 �c) — - GLACIER PARK COMPANYNotary Public in Ad for the State of r Washington, residing at :e.g.1' � �: %,By. _� � �'. Gordo • ---..774g.. z..e.._d // . /2/ / (Name of -.Notary Public) " s G 7gn7ire o Own Neil C. Kret (Address) Tohhy _ Cpntra1 Building (Address� .c.atr1P,, nn washja t P104 (City) (State) • 625 6423 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE-USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION. This is to certify that the foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and to conform to the rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing the filing of such application . i Date Received 19 Dy: Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 ti OF IR4, •• 0 THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o ° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR © PLANNING DEPARTMENT 93 co' 235— 2550 0,9grr.0 SEPlEM��� June 27, 1980 J .J . .Gordon Glacier Park Company Lobby 2 , Central Building Seattle, Washington 98104 Re: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION for preliminary plat to re-subdivide 8.4 acres of the Orillia Industrial Park - Phase I into two lots, File . No . PP-055-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Avenue S.W. between S .W. 29th Street and S.W. 34 Street Gentlemen : The Renton Planning Department formally accepted the above mentioned application on June 9 , 1980. A public hearing before the City of Renton Hearing Examiner has been set for July 15, 1980 at 9 :00 a.m. Representatives of the applicant are asked to be present. All interested persons are. invited to attend the hearing. If you have any further questions, please call the Renton Planning Department , 235-2550 . Very truly yours , Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : L. Steve Munson -Assistant Planner - - - - -_ cc : H .E . Kerry Brady International Hardwoods , Co . Lance Meuller & Associates . I • p z ' ir if v ' ,... '.'emu. i` ' t±" ' ..fi '.,` • . r d ry rrx.r., }n...�fr { ,r' • . 34141 ' Y r 1 f . to.' � `.r t • .S O.x"14 k`. 'r+t4 GENERAL LOCATION: AND, OR ADDRESS: Property located on the east side of Lind Avenue S.W. between S .W. 29th Street and S .W. 34th Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A detailed legal description is available on file in the Renton Planning .Department. I S POSTED TO NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS OF A . , , u n11- t1 �;fi' • TO BE HELD IN CITY ;COUNCIL CHAMBERS, MUNICIPAL BUILDING ON July 15 , 1980 BEGINNING AT 9 :00 AM gli.M. CONCEtMNG ITEM 171 I REZONE • SPECI . PE .1! TI ii SITE !..,, ....- A F t Q F ... vi,., • WAWE*T • • HOIEL .4: .PER r IT TA. Application for preliminary plat approval to re-subdivide 8 .4 acres of the Urillia Industrial Park - F'nase I into two lots, File PP-055-80 ; declaration _of non-significance issued by ' the Environmental Review Committee ; direct appeals to Hearing Exainer . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL 235 2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER RENTON, WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JULY 15 , 1980 , AT 9 :00 A .M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . SHANNON O 'NEIL, application for site approval for conversion of existing single family residence to dental office use ; File No . SA-054-80 ; property located at 1702 Duvall Avenue N.E . 2 . GLACIER PARK COMPANY, application for preliminary plat to re-subdivide 8 .4 acres of the. Orillia Industrial Park - Phase I into two lots, File No . PP-055-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Avenue . S.W. between S.W. 29th Street and S.W. 34th Street . 3 . BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY, application for special permit to fill and grade in M-P Zone , File No . SP-011-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Avenue S .W. , 550 feet north of S.W. 34th Street . 4. BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS COMPANY, application for site approval to construct 72 , 370 sq . ft . warehouse/ office facility in M-P Zone; File No . SA-012-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Avenue S .W. , 500 feet north of S.W. 34th Street . Legal descriptions of files noted above are on file in the Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE . • PRESENT AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 15, 1980 , AT 9 :00 A.M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS. PUBLISHED: JULY 2 , 1980 GORDON Y. ERICKSEN, RENTON PLANNING DIRECTOR CERTIFICATION I , STEVE MUNSON, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn to before me , a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing in King County , on the 26th day of June 1980 . SIGNED : ,SLAA27n41.444-e>v y i i BRADY INTERNATIONAL HARDWOODS, CO. P.O.Box 1572 Tacoma,Washington 98401 (206)572-7501 Cable BHARCO June 20, 1980 J. J. Gordon, Manager Property Management Dept. Burlington Northern Lobby 2, Central Building, Seattle, Washington 98104 Dear Mr. Gordon: On May 19, 1980, Orillia Investors, a Washington partnership was formed. The principals are, H. E. Kerry, Jr. , William G. Lightfoot and John E. Butson. Orillia Investors has been funded and will complete the purchase of Lot 7B in the Glacier Park Industrial Park, and will construct all improvements, own and lease the improvements for your agreed upon minimum term back to Brady International Hardwoods Company. I am now in the process of assigining my interest in the purchase agreement between myself and Glacier Park Industrial Park to Orillia Investors. Very truly yours, //.. 0 i 'E. Kerry, Jr! President HEK/dc FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE Application No (s ) : PP-055-80 Environmental Checklist No : ECF-576-80 Description of Proposal : Replat of an existing lot into 2 lots. Proponent : GLACIER PARK CO. Location of Proposal : East side of Lind Avenue S.W. between S .W. 29th Street and S .W. 34th Street Lead Agency : PLANNING DEPARTMENT This proposal was reviewed by the ERC on June 18 , 1980 following a presentation by Steve Munson of the Planning Department . No oral comments were made. Incorporated by reference in the record of the proceedings of the ERC on application ECF-576-80 are the following: 1 ) Environmental Checklist Review Sheet, prepared by : Steve Munson , Assistant Planner , dated June 18 , 1980 2 ) Applications: PP-055-80 3 ) Recommendations for a declaration of non-significance: Moved by Gordon Y . Ericksen , seconded by John E . Webley a declaration of non-significance be issued; all concurred. Acting as the Responsible Official , the ERC has determined this development does not have significant adverse impact on the environment . An EIS is not required under RCW 43 .21C .030 (2 ) (c) . This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a complete environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency . Reasons for declaration of environmental non-significance : Project had no adverse impacts . Signatures : . hn E . Weble Parks Director or on Y . E ' ck Planning g (� Director ?‘&76.74-1/7-10-a--0/4--- // Wa /en C . Gonnason, Director Public Works Department DATE OF PUBLICATION : June 25, 1980 EXPIRATION OF APPEAL PERIOD: July 9 , 1980 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a final declaration of non-significance for the following projects : 1 . SHANNON O ' NEIL (ECF-575-80) , application for site approval for conversion of existing single family residence to dental office use , File SA-054-80 ; property located at 1702 Duvall Avenue N.E . 2 . GLACIER PARK COMPANY (ECF-576-80) , application for preliminary plat to re-subdivide 8 .4 acres of the Orillia Industrial Park - Phase I into two lots , File No . PP-055-80 ; property located on the east side of Lind Avenue S .W. between S.W. 29th Street and S .W. 34th Street . The Environmental Review Committee (ERC ) has also issued a final declaration of significance for the following project : 3 . AUSTIN COMPANY (ECF-511-79) , application for special permit for fill and grade of approximately 250 ,000 cubic yards on 30 .8 acres , File No. SP-427-79 ; property located south side of S .W. 19th Street west of Raymond Avenue S.E . Further information regarding this action is available in the Planning Department , Municipal Building , Renton, Washington, 235-2550 . Any appeal of ERC action must be filed with the Hearing Examiner by July 9 , 1980 . Published : June 25 , 1980 CITY OF RENTON SHORT PLAT PLAT APPLICATION FILE NO. #2,P. ASS e o X MAJOR PLAT✓ DATE REC' D. 4 -'7-A) as • TENTATIVE r----:7-1R—P- OV APPLICATION FEE $ / �.—.X PRELIMINARY eNh l®\ ENVIRONMENTAL .r0 F INAL REVIEW FEE $ 4�' C) J�� 9 1980 RECEIPT NO. '6,'k SM NO. 40/kV PUD NO. • 4/11/ n1.‘6,,„:,,,,,/a L -37,E-Sa) APPLICANT TO COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROI'G'H"""7: 1. Plat Name & Location LOT 7, BLOCK 1, BURLINGTON NORTHERN ORILLIA INDUSTRIAL PARK OF RENTON. DIVISION I . LIND AVENUE BETWEEN S.W. 29TH ST. AND SW 34TH ST. 2 . No. Lots 2 Total Acreage R.14 Zoning M-P 3. Owner GLACIER PARK COMPANY Phone 625-6422 Address LOBBY 2 , CENTRAL BUILDING, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 5. Underground Utilities : Yes No Not Installed Telephone ( X ) ( ) ( ) Electric • ( X ) ( ) ( ) Street Lights ( X ) ( ) ( ) Natural Gas ( X ) ( ). ( ) TV Cable ( ) ( X) ( ) 6. Sanitation & Water: ( X ) City Water ( x ) Sanitary Sewers ( ) Water District No. ( ) Dry Sewers ( ) Septic Tanks 7. Vicinity and platmaps as required by Subdivision Ordinance. 8. DATE REFERRED TO: ENGINEERING PARKS BUILDING HEALTH TRAFFIC ENG. STATE HIGHWAY FIRE COUNTY PLANNING BD. PUBLIC WORKS OTHER 9. STAFF ACTION : TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVED DENIED APPEALED EXPIRED 10. LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER'S ACTION: SHORT PLAT APPROVED DENIED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED FINAL PLAT APPEALED • EXPIRED 11 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ,PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED DENIED , FINAL PLAT APPEALED EXPIRED 12. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENTS : DATE DATE BOND NO. AND TYPE GRANTED EXPIRES AMOUNT Planning Dept . Rev. 1/77 K_ . AFFIDAVIT •I, J. J. Gordon ' , being duly sworn, declare that .I am the owner of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I Subscribed and sworn before me this 6th day of June , 19 80 , Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Redmond, Washington. d./ (N e o Notary Publ' ) (S a ure of Owner) Ma ager of Property Management 16621 N.E. 46th St. Redmond, Washington 98052 Lobby 2 Central Building (Address) (Address) Seattle, Washington 98104 _ (City) (State) " 625-6422 • (Telephone) • (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) CERTIFICATION - This is to certify that the foregoing application has been ins13:ec e_d-by me and has been found to be thorough and complete in every particular and t,vccca�, £04111 07t@e rules and regulations of the Renton Planning Department governing t e i`i'in sine&sapplication. aUtO ,,i\\ Date Received , 19 By: 1 n n0 ,q/Pli. • �'-.' Renton Pla ing3 5B f 2-73 �-�.