Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA76-891 OF R4,, �► THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 ailL o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, A0 Q,co. CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 91'Eo SEP'cE- C E R T I F I CAT E STATE OF WASHINGTON) . COUNTY OF KING ) MAXINE E. MOTOR, City Clerk of the City of Renton, being first ' .duly sworn on .oath, deposes and says that she is a Citizen- of the United States, and a resident of the: State of Washington over the-.age of. 21 and .not a party of nor. interested- in this matter.. On this .9.th day of December, 1983; at 11:00 a. m. , I hereby certify that the attached Rezone application, Planning Commission minutes (Public Hearing Meeting January 19 , 19.77) . and Declaration of Restrictive, Covenants (reco'rding #7703010.782,) are true and correct copies from the file No. R 89l-76 (Stoneway Concrete Inc. ) e Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk ' e,B,_,Jiz Not y Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in King County • OF R� ,)% `� © THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON.WASH. 98055 o '� o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • MAXINE E.MOTOR, 4 CITY CLERK • (206) 235-2500 0 4TF0 SEP1.°1O March 2, 1983 Richard U. Chapin Inslee, Best, Chapin, Uhlman & Doezie, P.S. P 0 Box C-90016 Bellevue, WA 98009 Subject: City enton - Ordinance No. 3709 Rezone 891- Dear Mr. Chapin: The Renton City Council, at its regular meeting of February 14, 1983 has adopted Ordinance No. 3709 changing the zoning of certain properties within the City from Residence District (R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4 to General Classification District (G-1) (R-891-76). A copy of the above-referenced ordinance is enclosed. • Very truly yours, CITY OF RENTON Maxine E. Motor City Clerk MEM:db ENC: 1 Renton City Council February 14, 1983 Page Three on a part-time basis February 1st, and full-time employment effective this date. SR-515 Mayor Shinpoch reported status of SR-515 project in response to reque' by Councilman Stredicke 2/7/83 . A field trip to the Victoria Hills ;) ' disclosed the following conditions which were cited to the State Department of Transportation as unsatisfactory. 1 ) lack of acoustical fencing on east side of SR-515 from S. 23rd (city desires extension northerly to same point as fencing on opposite side) ; 2) lack of strec• lights on Talbot Road connection and responsibility of state for costs; 3) damaged asphalt overlay on bypass routes ; 4) impact to drainage facilities downstream towards Talbot Hill from construction and increase in impervious surfaces; 5) cost responsibility for traffi signal at S. 21st and SR-515; 6) safety measures needed at Talbot Road connection including reflectors , lane markers and guard rails; 7) stat has funded installation of curbs, gutters and laid work for sidewalk along state route with exception of city portion; and 8) installation of street lights. Councilman Stredicke raised additional concerns regarding responsibility for installation of a berm similar to the one installed by the state in Victoria Park; and responsibility for maintenance of Victoria Hills internal roadway since a question exist' regarding whether it will be dedicated to the city or retained by the homeowners association when formed. Sales Tax Councilman Rockhill inquired regarding sales tax projections and the city' s standing to date. Finance Director Mulcahy advised that sales tax receipts are fairly close to anticipated revenue. Mr. Rockhill also inquired regarding assessed valuation statistics contained in the 1983 Budget Summary. Mr. Mulcahy explained that the new construction roll was approximately 67 million dollars, and the remainder of the 344 million dollar assessed valuation attributed tip inflation; and reviewed levy lid laws which limit increases from one year to the next Further discussion was held regarding the possibility of an increase in sales tax by King County; and hope expressed that sales tax issues will be resolved by July, 1983, resulting in uniform sales tax rate for all cities. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Ways and Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented a report recommends . Committee the following ordinances for second and final readings : Ordinance #3709 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property Stoneway located east of Maple Valley Highway, south of Monterey Terrace and Concrete Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Powerline right-of-way from Reversionary Residence District (R-1 , R-2, R-3 and R-4) to General Classification Ordinance District (G-1 ) for Stoneway Concrete Co. , R-891-76. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES., COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED . ROLL CAI ALL AYES. CARRIED. Ordinance #3710 An ordinance was read amending a portion of Chapter 19 of Title V Taxicab of the City Code relating to taxicabs (deregulation) . MOVED BY Ordinance CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED. Ordinance #3711 An ordinance was read changing the zoning classification of property Sparks-Shegrud located on the east side of Talbot Road S. approximately 625 feet soutl Rezone of S. 43rd Street from G-1 (General ) to P-1 (Public Use) District, R-063-82 Sparks-Shegrud Rezone, R-063-82. Responding to Councilman Stredicke' s request for a comparison of all developments in the area of the subjec. rezone to assure consistency of land use, Assistant City Attorney Dan Kellogg reviewed previous applications, noting while they differ slick the ultimate effect is the same. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED. ROLL CALL: 6 AYES: TRIMM, MATHEWS, REED, ROCKHILL, HUGHES, CLYMER. 1 NAY: STREDICKE. CARRIED . • - 1 WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT FEBRUARY 14, 1983 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinances for second and final reading : Stoneway Concrete Rezone - Reversion of Ordinance /!3113 (R-891-76) , Taxicab Ordinance Sparks/Shegrud Rezone (R-063-82) The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following ordinance for first reading : Central Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment The Ways and Means Committee recommends the following resolutions for reading and adoption : Gateway PUD-054-82 • One Valley Place PUD-061-82 Inter-Fund Borrowing APPOINTMENT The Ways and Means Committee recommends concurrence in the Mayor' s appointment of Mr. Gregory E. Parsons to the Municipal Arts Commission to complete the term p of Peggy Cummins , who has resigned. This appointment will e effective to 12/31/84. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS The Ways and Means Committee recommends approval of Vouchers No. 49184 through No. 49580 in the amount of S1 , 113,057.47. ic) Ear Clyme , airm� Richard Stredicke - P,ober ug es F • 1 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO . 3709 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHII` HE CITY OF RENTON FROM RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-1 , R-2 , R-3 and R-4) r.0 GENERAL CLASSIFICATION DISTRICT (G-1) (R-891-76) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No . 1628 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Residence District (R-1 , R-2 , R-3 and R-4) ; an'1 WHEREAS Restrictive Covenants , recorded under Auditor ' s File No . 7703010762 , were made a condition of rezoning under Ordinance No . 3113 which caused the zoning to revert without further City action upon the failure to commence construction by a date certain which has been established and re-established to the date of February 2 , 1983 and such construction having failed to commence ; NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : SECTION I : The following described property in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to General Classification District (G-1) as hereinbelow specified. The Building and Zoning Department is hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance , as amended, to evidence said rezoning , to-wit : See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein . (Said property being located east of SR-169) Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right of Way) SECTION II : This Ordinance shall be effective upon its passage approval and five days after publication. III PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 14th day of February, 1983 . Maxine E. Motor , City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 14th day of February , 1983 . &AAA& att,nflo Barbara Y. Shin och P � Mayor Approved as to form: Lavtence J. Warn�ren, City Attorney Date of Publication : February 18, 1983 • EXHIBIT ",l PARCEL " A" The west 850. 32 feet of the north 100 feet , ( the west 850. 32 feet being measured along the North line , and the north 100 feet being measured at right angles to the North line ) of the following described main tract : MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point " A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526. 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec - tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . 11169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . Except any portion of said Parcel "A" lying within the Green- belt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May -17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" . PARCEL " B" The west 1180. 32 feet , as measured along the North line , of the following described main tract : MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; • thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 38°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the [fast line of said section to an intersec - tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St . S . R . 11169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . • Ex=_dt ..y portion of said Palle] }' 9 lyin within the north 100 feet of the west 850 . 32 feet , as measured at right angles to and along the North line thereof . This exception also known as Parcel "A" . ALSO except any portion of said Parcel " B" lying within the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said. Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" PARCEL " C" The east 799 feet as measured along the North line of the • following described main tract : MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point " A" ; thence south 89°45 ' i ' east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169 ) ( Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point " A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point oif beginning . Except any portion of said Parcel " C" lying within the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel E ALSO except the area known as Parcel " D" and more partic- ularly described as.. follows : Beginning at the Northeast corner of the above described main tract : Thence southerly along the easterly line thereof a distance of 300 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence westerly parallel with the North line of the main tract herein described a distance of 300 feet to an intersection with a line which is parallel with and 300 feet westerly of , as measured at right angles to , the east line of said main tract ; thence southerly along said parallel line to an intersection with the northeasterly line of the Green- belt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972, said Greenbelt area also knownias Parcel " E" ; thence southeasterly along the nlortherly line of said Greenbelt area to an intersection with the East line of said main tract ; thence northerly along the East line thereof a distance of 800 feet more or less to the point of beginning . -2- PARCEL '3" Beginning at the .NE corner of the MAIN TRACT as described below : Thence southerly along the easterly line thereof a distance of 300 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence westerly parallel with the North line of the main tract herein des- cribed a distance of 300 feet to an intersection with a line which is parallel with and 300 feet westerly of , as measured at right angles to , the East line of said main tract ; thence southerly along said parallel line to an intersection with the northeasterly line of the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" ; thence southeasterly along the northerly line of the Greenbelt area to an intersection with the East line of said main tract ; thence northerly along the East line thereof a distance of 800 feet more or less to the point of beginning . MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south • 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that • lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . PARCEL " E" All that portion of the following described main tract designated as a Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 . MAIN TRACT : . All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 3 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 25? . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St: . S . R . 11169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in -3- a ne Northwesterly direcon along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 '17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point " A" and the true point of beginning . -4- . • . . g EXHIBIT A . • , - . • ::: . • • A \ - • .-- • • .__ .. \ . . ./ f•....- ,..... -__ \ I --- r--" ---7:, ----..' ./ • k. \•:-.•--/ Ls/ Efi---, t ''`.s . ... •• ,' • , 1 ••4.! . • . 410Arr-----E. C /:•:,' , .. .,•,.,.* ,..• .,1 Ep...1E.V, . . . . ; . , ,r. •• . / •/I t . ,D ,. --] . .0. t-.------;::.cd,..7\,. / ---,,-., e ....T •,,,... , Lr•AE ,,..,,, • r LAI ,-. .., •-`": p.5 .., ;. - • ;'• - , ..7., i I.,Fr--• • . 1 / i(Li 1-4i,, .‹ ‘. u • li I.. • - '( t-- •'-P; ! R.. - - ‘. I, „• .1 ., v.T.:, 1,-- I'"b I :,.-• . 1 ..:- : 1 H G' ' ' 11 • E,' Li ',, ' - - ; .'• , , _ • . 5 •Ll 61 ; ,V' . • \ •*--"‘ '. -.-- ------— • _id, --.7 - • -;7- -.•. — ! ' r-1., • i C--1 .•'-'-', CI • - . F''''•j >. '-'1 .; 3E' : ,—, :..1 .4( \1 - \ I 4V1ONTEREY . 1rtERRAC -... .1 \ ,.... • IL_J . , • ii21 .., -----____.. , — , >-. 1.. . ., . -!..i _• „,\AT, OLIVET_CEMETERY Lk. L3- •6:, a-.. . , r.-7 •, w • • ,._.., z, ' PADipcL '1 '1 'i- . . — .1 —• . t..---. , < :.1:. F i 1:-_ . 0 , s .%s i• :;.....,I ' . • • 7 .-7.i Z i -.L.7 ..\ ,--, .•/.." I,' / . il -..,..% ,0),.C. 't'-•:1-----2 ,.; - .••• . '"• ',/ • v C..::.• . .• . ..- • I .. ..-- --=.._ __:.." iy / , :Li:I f,Y - .. ,•4 hi 4/ ": i 3',.,1.4.: : :. • :.0 -1 : .--'• '--7' !' , L----' • • / r ----------÷ -1------- •------,-----.' '\: .... I . • : • • . . . , I . . • . . . , . .. . .,. R.a. 1 • ._,„ . 1 -4 e.r.-•cr: ..., -, Pbgeetv tai Clv • L:7 ,..., • ! FARcsi.. C. -.• _ L..:r€. • - . : .... ' I I 1.5 cti.t 0 . z • Roo 4,-. • I . _ . . D . , .. \ ! I c.. a . . i .... ... _ • ..,... ..... .-:„_............. . L c v4 .•__ L. . • ] . 47 r, _ .......2......:„, : . . .. • ) . -........... . . • • . . . . . .. .: . . .. r • . -...._:. • \ , . ,.. • 04(.4....s.. . , . . . , • • . .. .. .. . . i .'..17.‘.--- . ••,, ,s :•., . s.. ' • .•'..-...'• L t-os9 . ,...-../ C • r. , \ .e A v• ''-'e ' -' .‘7'411:3•-. ,., '.4,(`' • . i '•' . -. • ', . • .,. •• .. C-‘.1 1:,_ 9 \ ‘• • \ \ ••-•• -- : •::•: . • -•ri 4e,e, \", .... ,:\ ,-k,... .,,,,::-. . ,,,,,,,t --;:,, ,,,i •, , . .. . \ -; .S.. .)-. •-• , . • • •-.•-. , , - .l• ' \ '. 1 •#..._ r : .• ,. '. . .--.. • . e • * Renton City Council January 24, 1983 Page Four AUDIENCE Joel Haggard, 720 Olive Way, Seattle, requested the recommendation of COMMENT the Planning and Development Committee be read regarding the One Valley Place PUD appeall. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY HUGHES, SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented a report Development recommending jdoption by the City Council of the Examiner's report with Committee the following amendments: 1) Condition No. 1 to read as follows: The One Valley applicant provides proof to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Place PUD Committee that a mechanism, whether city initiated LID or otherwise, Appeal will provide that the roads in the area are improved to accommodate the FPUD-061-82 projected traffic of Phase I of such development prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2) Delete the second sentence of Conclusion No. 9. 3) Delete the last 14 words in the first sentence of Finding No. 9 and delete the second sentence in Finding No. 9. 4) Delete the first sentence in Conclusion No. 6 and substitute in its place, "Increasing stall width to nine feet and aisle width to 22 feet while providing a 10% reduction in the required number of parking stalls is appropriate. Applicant has voluntarily agreed to modify Section 4.03 of the CCR's (Exhibit #6 of Files PPUD-032-81 and PP-044-81 ) to conform with the above." 5) Delete the second paragraph of Conclusion No. 7. 6) Delete wording on Recommendation No. gland substitute in its place, "The CCR's shall be revised in conformance with Conclusion No. 6." MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Following discussion regarding parking configuration, MOTION CARRIED. Audience Lois Rancourt, 1116 N. 38th Street, requested Planning and Comment Development Committee report be read regarding Dietch appeal of continued Rancourt Short Plat 055-82. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY REED, SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Planning and Planning and Development Committee Chairman Rockhill presented a report Development recommending affirmation of the Hearing Examiner's report with the Committee exception that the Examiner was in error by not requiring that access Rancourt to and from the lots be by a dedicated public street. The committee Short Plat recommended that access requirement be changed to require a one-half Appeal public street with the exact length and terminus to be determined by Sh. P1 . 055-82 the Public Works Department after considering grades on the property. If no grade problems, the public streets should be extended the entire length of the property to serve later potential development in the area. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY REED, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE. Upon request, letter from Dewey Rancourt was read. The letter requested concurrence in the Examiner's recommendation for approval of a private road and denial of the appeal . CARRIED. Request for Rhonda Bryant, 1518 S. 28th, requested letter from Lawrence W. Ashley Sewer Connection be read. MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, SUSPEND THE RULES AND ADVANCE TO CORRESPONDENCE. CARRIED. Letter was read requesting Council permission to connect Cascade Vista residential lot outside city limits to Renton sewer system for purposes of sale. Following Council discussion regarding disposition of the matter, it was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY REED, REFER LETTER TO UTILITIES COMMITTEE FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION. Councilman Clymer requested display in the Chambers of a map designating sewer lines for Council reference. MOTION CARRIED. Consent Agenda James Colt, P.O. Box 547, requested Item 8.c. of the Consent Agenda Item 8.c. be read. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, SUSPEND THE RULES AND Reversion of ADVANCE TO CONSENT AGENDA, ITEM 8.c. CARRIED. Building and Zoning nrdinanre #1111 Department requested reversion of Ordinance No. 3113, rezone from G-1 (ERADCO) to variety of multiple family zones on February 22, 1977, approved with restrictive covenants to enforce reversion of zoning on property owned by Stoneway Concrete, Inc. (ERADCO) if construction not commenced in accordance with time schedule. New ordinance to correct zoning map required for subject property to designate reverted G-1 zoning. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, MATTER OF REVERSION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3113 BE REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Renton City Council January 24, 1983 Page Three MOVED BY TRIMM, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL RECESS FOR FIVE MINUTES. Recess CARRIED. Time: 9:20 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:25 p.m. Roll call : All present. Picketers Kathy Keolker, 532 Cedar Avenue S. , Coordinator of Citizens for a Against Quality Community, advised committee support of Council action to Porno use tax dollars to fight adult film fare at two downtown Renton theatres. Following introduction, approximately 150 sign-carrying members of the community group filed through the Chambers. PUBLIC HEARING This being the date set and proper notices having been posted and Central Renton published according to law, Mayor Shinpoch opened the public hearing Comprehensive to consider the Central Renton Comprehensive Plan Amendment. David Plan Amendment Clemens, Policy Development Director, described the boundaries of the plan, reviewed history of Planning Commission review and recommendations, and discussed consistency of zoning and land use with Comprehensive Plan designations denoted on the plan. The four map elements of the plan were discussed: Land Use Element, Community Facilities Element, Circulation Element, and Utilities Element; 'and implementing policies which support and clarify the intent of the map elements reviewed including City-Wide Policies, Planning Policies for Central Area Plan, and Sub-Area Policies. The final Comprehensive Plan, distributed in booklet form to members of the audience, is the end result of extensive public comment and consultation between staff and Planning Commission members. Responding to Councilman Rockhill 's query regarding downzoned areas, Mr. Clemens advised that no zoning changes whatsoever are proposed on the plat, but three areas are not the same as designated on the previous plan. Minor changes in areas of south Renton, east of Park Avenue in north Renton, and an area near the Cedar River were discussed and designated on the map. Responding to Councilman Stredicke's query regarding office/office park designation of commercially zoned property at corner of Benson Road and Grady Way S. , Mr. Clemens advised that due to abundancy of commercially zoned property in other areas and proximity of the site to a congested intersection, after considerable deliberation, the Commission had designated the site as denoted. Audience Chester Wildman, 8415 S. 123rd Place, Seattle, expressed concern about Comment water bill increases. Since there was uncertainty regarding which water district serves the property, Mayor Shinpoch agreed to research the matter and notify Mr. Wildman of findings. Ethel Klepach, 8916 S. 121st St. , Seattle, requested information regarding annexation procedures. Mr. Clemens outlined the process requiring petition signed by 75% of the population in the area; however, due to community opinion, annexation is highly unlikely. Mrs. Klepach asked why residents in her area pay taxes for Renton School District, but are precluded from voting in that district. Mayor Shinpoch indicated that King County Elections Bureau would be contacted for clarification of the matter. Enri Quepleta, 800 S.W. 3rd Place, inquired if adoption of the plan by the City Council gives assurance to Earlington Hill residents that no further land use changes will occur. Councilman Clymer advised rezones in the area are still feasible, zoning being a separate process than comprehensive planning, and constant vigilance is required by citizens for apprisal of land use activity in their neighborhood. Mr. Quepleta requested separation of Earlington Hill area from downtown area on the map, noting no commonality with CBD. Mr. Clemens advised awareness by Planning Commission of low density character of Earlington area, and inclusion with CBD is a matter of convenience due to its proximity and small size. Rose Boyce, 2020 Grant Avenue, inquired of designation of three lots located at northwest corner of 2nd Street and Factory Avenue N. Mr. Clemens indicated those lots and adjoining property are designated commercial land use. Versie Vaupel , 400 Cedar Avenue S. , inquired regarding extent of notice of public hear-ing. City Clerk advised legal posting in 30 places in the city with list of locations available for review. Mrs. Vaupel , former Planning Commission member, requested deletion of her name from the list of commissioners denoted on the cover of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment since her membership terminated prior to adoption. Since there were no further comments, it was MOVED BY REED, SECONDED BY HUGHES, THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. CARRIED. MOVED BY ROCKHILL, SECONDED BY REED, THE SUBJECT OF THE CENTRAL RENTON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT BE REFERRED TO THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. 4 r 1 L.. For.Use By City Clerk's Office Only A. I . # AGENDA ITEM, ; RENTON CITY COUNCIL MEETING saa`aaaa aa a==aaa. a :tea sasssaaa amoWas- SUBMITTING Dept./Div./Bd./Comm. Building & Zoning For Agenda Of January 24, 1983 (Meeting Date) Staff Contact Roger Blaylock (Name) Agenda Status: SUBJECT: STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. Consent - (ERADCO)/REVERSION OF ORDINANCE 3113 Public Hearing Correspondence Ordinance/Resolution Old Business Exhibits: (Legal Descr. , Maps, Etc.)Attach. New .Business Study Session A. Attached memorandum. Other B. C. Approval : Legal Dept. Yes X No N/A_ COUNCIL ACTION RECOMMENDED: Refprral tn ^ _Finance Dept. Yes No. N/A_ Ways and Means Committee for ordinance Other Clearance preparation. FISCAL IMPACT: -0- Expenditure Required $ Amount $ Appropriation- $ Budgete Transfer Required SUMMARY (Background information, prior action and effect of implementation) (Attach additional pages if necessary. ) The subject property was rezoned from G-1 to a variety of multiple family zones in accord- ance with Ordinance 3113 with restrictive covenants that provided for commencement of cons- truction within a certain time period. A series of extensions of this time period were granted, finally to expire February 1, 19831. Thus, in accordance with provisions of the covenants indicating that "the zoning, of said property shall without further City action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document, and these restrictive covenants shall become null and void, " the Building and Zoning Department on February 2, 1983, will interpret the zoning on the subject site as G-1, General Use District. A new ordinance will be necessary, however, to correct the Official Zoning Map. Since a public hearing is not necessary, and the Council will not be meeting on January 31, 1983, it is recommended that the item be sent to Ways and Means Committee on February 7th` " for ordinance preparation. PARTIES OF RECORD/INTERESTED CITIZENS TO BE CONTACTED: SUBMIT THIS COPY TO CITY CLERK BY NOON ON THURSDAY WITH DOCUMENTATION. OF J v t$r; ® BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT ' RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR Z IDAL 43) Op w' MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 ® 235-2540 0,947- 0 SEPTe° BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR • April 16, 1982 James L. Colt Mt. Olivet Cemetery Company, Inc. P.O. Box 547 Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Colt: After further review of the record, RR-8 7676, and the ensuing City Ordinance 3113, it is the City's position that the app ical nt complied with the condition to submit an application for a planned unit development prior to February 1, 1982. The application was recieved on January 28, 1982. Therefore, the current zoning of R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4 are still valid and the covenants are still in effect. If you disagree with the administrative interpretation of the Building & Zoning Department, you have the right of appeal to the Hearing Examiner under Section 4-3011. Sincerely, 49.---Recalue,, CFO, 1.41,4 Roger J. Blaylock Zoning Administrator RJB:cl MT. OLIV T CEMETERY COMPANY, INC. 1 April 8, 1982 CITY O;, RENTON [uit [HTN ', 1'.O. BOX 547 RENTON, City of Renton I, WA 98055 Building Department APR i2 1gg2 (206) 255-0323 200 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 BUILDING/ZONING DEPT. , Attention: Mr. Ron Nelson , Dear Mr . Nelson: 1 This letter confirms our conversation on April 5 , 1982 in which you stated that the "ERADCO" project and Kent-Highlands property must go through a new rezoning process from the beginning, as the property had reverted to its original zoning , as was required by Ordinance. i So that there could be no confusion in this matter you decided to discuss the matter with Dave Clemmons and call me back. • When you returned my call, you assured myself and Mr . William Bulchis , a Seattle attorney, that the property had in fact been returned to its original "G" zoning and that Mr . Clemmons had told you that he had informed "ERADCO" of the necessity for them to submit a completely new application to try and have the property rezoned to a higher density . You explained that the notice for public hearing appearing in the paper set for April 20th, 1982 was incorrect and that a new appli- cation for rezone would have to be submitted by "ERADCO" . This present representation confirms those statements made by the vari- ous City departments and at City Council meetings over the last several months . I have had my name on the list of parties concerned about ,and to receive information regarding the Kent-Highlands-ERADCO project and would appreciate being notified on a continuing basis of any action in this matter rat er than reading notices (which are in- consistant with depar ental statements) in the public notice section of the Re rd-Chronicle . Thank you fo your help in this matter . S(:: xel , .Yam- s L. Colt c, : Dave Clemmons , Roger Blaylock, Hrg Ex. Office SERVING KING COUNTY SINCE 1875 OF R4•4 N 1 0 THE CITY OF RENTON be .Q; z '+i;, .4!, •'{" POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • 235-2552 z NalL .s , 0O a '. " la, MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055. 9,0 co- O9g1eD SEPTG424 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR February 1 , 1982 Richard U. Chapin Inslee, Best, Chapin, Uhlman & Doezie, P. S. P.O. Box C-90016 • Bellevue, Washington 98009-9016 RE: MONTEREY TERRACE ORDINANCE 3113 Dear Mr. Chapin: This department has reviewed this rezone ordinance and the covenants required in its approval. These covenants require submission of a Planned Unit Development application within certain time limits and beginning of construction within one year of the commencement of the approval process. Having reviewed these documents and previous correspondence, it is our conclusion that the requirement for submission of a PUD application by February 1 , 1982, still applies and has been complied with. Due to the remaining restriction on the requirement for commencement of construction within one year, this department must conclude that no further exten- sions may be granted. In order to resolve all of the issues surrounding these matters, we would recommend that a new rezone application be submitted so that it may be processed concurrently with the PUD applica- tion. To provide you with an ample opportunity to prepare this application, we will grant an extension of the application time until February 16th. Should there be any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yo s 1C- . Z/ d 11,6 Da id R. Clemens Policy Development Director cc: Roger Blaylock, Zoning Administrator INS , BEST, CHAPIN, UHLMAN & ; EZIE, P. S. Deborah S.Berg ATTORNEYS AT LAW James F.Hoover Jerome D.Carpenter SUITE 900,ONB PLAZA - Evan E.Inslee Richard U.Chapin 10800 N.E. 8th William C.Irvine Don E.Dascenzo P.O.BOX C-90016 William J.Lindberg,Jr. Thomas H.De Buys BELLEVUE.WASHINGTON 98009-9016 Patricia A Murray E.Michael Doezie John T.Rassier Stanley E.Erickson 2720 RAINIER BANK TOWER Milan Gail Ryder Michael M.Fleming SEATTLE.WASHINGTON 98101 Wes Uhlman Thomas H.Grimm Joe E.Wishcamper Henry R.Hansen,Jr. David Alpheus Best,of Counsel (206)455-1234 PLEASE REPLY TO: Bellevue January 26 , 1982 Mr. David R. Clemens Planning Department City of Renton Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Monterey Terrace - Ordinance No. 3113 Dear Mr. Clemens : It is respectfu-ly requested that the time for approval of the submission for preliminary PUD approval for the Monterey Terrace Development be extended to �,�,,, �, I I Z As you know, the last extension expires on February 1, 1982 . In 1977, when the subject property was rezoned to its current zoning classification in compliance with the then existing Compre- hensive Plan, the City was in the process of examining its long- range growth and development policies . At that time, the Council concluded that it was necessary to establish some time limit for development of the property so that if the Comprehensive Plan was later changed, the City would not be "stuck" with zoning on this property which might not be consistent with such future plan changes . Since that time there has been a long series of events , in- cluding change of ownership of the property, which have combined to prevent finalization of the development. Throughout, the City administration has been extremely cooperative in continuously work- ing with the owners and their consultants to achieve a development which meets the needs of the City, as well as accomplishing the goals of the owners. The many many plan changes have finally been completed, the EIS has been finalized, the ERC has completed its review and analysis , the application has been amended to meet the requirements of the existing PUD Ordinance and the matter is now ready for a hearing by the Examiner and final action by the Council. • Mr. David R. Clemens Planning Department City of Renton Page Two Re: Monterey Terrace - Ordinance No. 3113 In the meantime, the City has completed its Comprehensive Plan review and it has recently affirmed the existing Comprehensive Plan for this area. In other words, although there may be some engineering type issues remaining to be resolved by the Hearing Examiner, the existing zoning on the property is consistent with current City policies as expressed in the Comprehensive Plan to achieve "in filling" at the existing zoning densities on this property. Consequently, we believe that the interests of the City, the public and the owner will be best served by rapid completion of the Master Plan-PUD process. This is particularly important at a time when there is a critical need for new housing and new employ- ment, both of which will be afforded by new residential development. We do not believe any worthwhile purpose will be accomplished by allowing the property to revert to its pre-1977 zoning. Such action will necessitate a rezone application to return the property to its current status. The resulting administrative time , money and inconvenience of processing such application would not be of substantial benefit to either the City or the owner. For all of the foregoing reasons, we request that the City exercise its discretion to consider extensions on a case by case basis and grant an extension for completion of the PUD process on this property to J I i ' cf - . This will give ample time for the City to schedule a'nd hold a public hearing and allow the Council to take final action on the merits of the application. Very truly yours, INSLEE, BEST, CHAPIN, UHLMAN & DOEZIE, P .S . V( 1, Richard U. Chapin RUC/pjm cc: Ms. Susan Prentke al-) OF RA,ivA IL' 9 © o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • LAND USE HEARING EXAMINER 9,p `O` FRED J. KAUFMAN. 235-2593 0917. 0SEP-C °3 Q�iRENT '/k October 19, 1981 � C�� � � TO: Members, Environmental Review Committee U ` 1� 0Z e ' LLJ FROM: Fred J. Kaufman, Hearing Examiner . A. RE: Letter from Representatives of ERADCO Raising Ae .m,-/ Potential Appeal Issues Regarding Actions of N1N G the ERC '�' This office has received correspondence regarding the above entitled decision of the ERC and will await further action by your committee before proceeding to make proper disposition of the matters referred to in that correspondence. it Environmental Research & Development c Corporation __^Y 18000 Pacific Highway South,Suite 1115,Seattle,Washington 98188 Phone-(206)244-0080 ' =�J: w::: n 15, 1981 gb e Clemens M City of Renton, Planning Division jAN 1981 Municipal Building -• }�,: 200 Mill Avenue South _ . 1/c Renton,, Washington 98055 "�it. 4� �` Dear Dave: This letter is to formally request of your department an extension of approximately one year to provide for an orderly approval process and timely start of construction on the Monterey Terrace Contract Rezone Master Plan. We feel that diligent good faith efforts have been made to make progress on developing the site. Surely, since ERADCO has become involved with this property .substantial progress has been made, with all deadlines imposed by the City of Renton having been met by us. However, due to the long time in queue and your subsequent request for supplemental traffic analysis and data, the revised EIS is just today being submitted. Unfortunately, we will now be required to wait for review and printing of this EIS revision and will also be re-scheduled for hearing. In view of these facts the approval process has caused a significant time delay. Time needed for final master plan approval , final engineering design, bidding, and permit approval could well represent a year before construction could begin. It is with this in mind, and for the, reasons outlined above, that we are requesting an extension to 2/1/82 to ensure adequate coordination with all interested parties. Thank you for your consideration of this extension. Should you so desire, you may approve this request by signing below. Sincerely yours, Roberta M. Hayhurst Operations Manager Date /16/1/ • Request approved : ' :' t David *emens for the City of Renton • EMIesc ;bs�� - OF k41+ A. e10 . O THE CITY OF RENTON • eks -�- MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON.WASH.98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH. MAYOR to PLANNING DEPARTMENT OAO�/4 O�P� May 14, 1900 235- 2550 TED SEP-T . Roberta M. Hayhurst Property Manager Environmental Research & Development Corporation 18000 Pacific Highway South, Suite 1115 Seattle, Washington 98188 RE : MONTEREY TERRACE P .U.D. Dear Mrs. Hayhurst : We have reviewed your letter of May 12 , 1980, and concur that the time schedule set forth on March 19, 1980., should be revised to reflect current conditions. Therefore , after consultation with R . W. Thorpe Associates , we have revised the time schedule to meet both the consultant ' s and our requirement . We have also discussed your cash flow concerns with our Finance Department . It will be necessary to make cash deposits with the City . However , we have proposed to separate the cost into three (3) deposits to be dated June 1st , July 1st, and September 1st. We believe that th.is will meet both of our needs . Time schedule for project : June 1* Initial deposit equal to amount of one-half of the estimated Draft EIS cost placed in City account - IERADCO. July 1* Submit 10 copies of preliminary Draft EIS (preparation not to exceed 60 days) - con- sultant . Deposit of remaining one-half of Draft EIS cost - ERADCO. August 1 Completion of review of preliminary DRAFT EIS - (review not to exceed 30 days) - City . Billing #1 for staff review costs - City . August 15* Payment to EIS account for Billing #1 - ERADCO. September 1* Completion of final Draft EIS (preparation not to exceed 30 days from City comments)- consultant . Deposit of estimated cost of Final EIS - ERADCO. 41 Roberta M. Hayhurst Environmental Research & Development Corporation May 14, 1980 Page Two September epte er 15 Concurrence in final Draft EIS (not to exceed 15 d'ays from receipt) - City Commence printing Draft EIS - consultant . October 1 Mail Draft EIS ; comence 35-day review period - City ; payment to R . W. Thorpe Associates for Draft EIS - City. Billing. U2 for staff review costs - City . October 15* Payment to EIS account for Billing #2- ERADCO. November 5 End of referral period. November 10 Review of comments - City/consultant . December 1 Complete Final EIS (preparation not to exceed 21 days) - consultant . Circulate Final EIS - City ; payment to R. W. Thorpe Associates for Final EIS 30 days following circulation of Final EIS - City. Final billing for EIS preparation and review - City. December 8* Final payment for preparation and review of EIS - ERADCO. December 9 Public hearing on Master Plan before Hearing Examiner. As previously agreed, unless all dates noted with an asterisk (*) are met by the applicant, the rezone application, approved by Ordinance 3113 pursuant to restrictive covenants dated February 22, 1977, shall be deemed to have expired, and the zoning shall automatically revert to previous zoning. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Very truly yours, Gor n Y. Er ' cksen Pla ping Di a br I� rye' a Senior Planner DRC :wr (7 $ Environmental Research & Development Corporation • • 18000 Pacific Highway South,Suite 1115,Seattle,Washington 98188 Phone-(206)244-0080 — May 12, 1980 -Mr.- Dave- Clemens City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Clemens: Pursuant to our phone conversation of today, we hereby request written clarification of the time schedule set forth by the Planning Department with regard to the Monterey Terrace P.U. D. - - -Inasmuch-as you have had unforeseen. deviations from the schedule to-date, ERADCO feels it timely to re-establish the working calendar in order • to monitor the P.U.D. as it proceeds through the proper processing. Additionally, it is hoped that we will be able to affect a means by which our deposit for the E. I.S. preparation can be in the form of a • -- note or other negotiable instrument in lieu of the cash deposit called for in your letter of March 19, 1980. Your further direction in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely yours, Roberta M. Hayhurst Property Manager RMH/d • • ,r • 131230 -{ • EDI securities investments o4 eci/a7 OF RA,, ;b z THE CITY OF RENTON © MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 czi BARBARA, Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT c9 235- 2550 o -so sEPt*-M��P April 15, 1980 p MEMORANDU M TO : Public Works Director FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director By : David R . Clemens , Senior Planner RE: MINUTES OF MEETING RE : MT. OLIVET CEMETERY AND PROPOSED ERADCO ROAD The following people attended a meeting at 1 :30 p.m. on Tuesday April 15, 1980 regarding the above : Warren Gonnason David Clemens Roger Blaylock Larry Warren Ron Nelson Dick Houghton Jim Colt, Mt. Olivet Cemetery Ted Gathe, Attorney for 'Mr . Colt Bob DeBoer, Stoneway Sand and Gravel Pat Easter, ERADCO Discussed in brief were the problems surrounding the concurrent completion of the Mt . Olivet Special Permit for filling and grading and the construction of the ERADCO roadway. It was noted that the Mt . Olivet permit would expire on May 9, 1980,:. and would require extension . Also, the permit. for the ERADCO roadway required approval of a Special Permit , if not constructed in accordance with the. Mt. Olivet permit (roadway on an easement .over the Mt . Olivet property)". Several alternatives were considered to resolve the problem of an extension of the Mt . Olivet permit, and to make the ERADCO road construction coincide with the Stoneway rezone application approval. It was concluded that: 1) The Mt. Olivet permit will expire and requires extension by the submission of a new permit. 2) The ERADCO roadway can only be constructed in accord- ance with the Mt. Olivet permit . � C Page 2 Warren Gonnason April 15 , 1980 3) ERADCO may construct the road at their own risk until such time as the PUD approval requirements of the Stoneway rezone are complied with. At the conclusion of the meeting, Mr. Colt indicated that they would be submitting a new: special permit, and that they would also request that the construction portion of their current permit remain in force, until such time as the Examiner acts upon the new application . The City Attorney and Public Works Director indicated that they would consider such a request. ERADCO discussed their concerns related to the PUD approval (estimated to occur early in 1981 due to the EIS preparation required) , and its relationship to the roadway. The Planning staff indicated that until the PUD is approved, that the roadway cannot be considered as acceptable access to . the ERADCO (former Stoneway ) property. Any roadway construction would therefore be at the risk of ERADCO in that the access may not be approved as proposed due to environmental or other problems. The meeting closed with Mt. Olivet proposing a new application and a request to allow continuing operations until the Examiners decision on the new permit . ERADCO indicated that they would consider whether to continue work on the roadway in accordance with the Mt . Olivet permit requirements ,or halt work until the PUD is approved . DRC : do cc : Mayor Shinpoch Mt. Olivet file ' ERADCO file w Environmental Research & Development Corporation April 1, 1980 Sea-Tac Office Building • Phone:/206)244-0080 18000 Pacific Highway South • Seattle,WA.98188 Mr. Dave Clemens , Senior Planner +� 913 1-2\ Planning Department U 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 ,' \\\Re: Monterey Terrace -� qN KING Dear Mr. Clemens: We have reviewed the letter of March 19th from Gordon Ericksen in which he has indicated that an extension approval will be granted in the above mentioned P.U. D. submitted for the purposes of preparing an E. I.S. It is further our understanding that said extension is granted subject to the time schedule included in your letter. Upon careful review, we find this schedule acceptable to our needs and shall proceed towards a successful completion of the tasks as outlined. . Inasmuch as Thorpe and Associates has 'ably assisted us in the data collection efforts for the P.U. D. submittal , we would ask your approval and confirmation of the choice of this firm for the E. I.S. preparation in lieu of the circulation of a proposal request as mentioned in your letter. Your written confirmation of receipt of this letter and discussion regarding our using Thorpe and Associates for the E. I.S. will be appreciated. Thank you. Sincerely yours, • Roberta M. Hayhurst • Property Manager RMH/d OF i � A _ kk*. „ • THE CITY OF RENTON `� Q Z. MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH.98055 are. n BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 09 m' - 235- 2550 9�TFD SEPT� �� - - - - - - • March 19, 1980 Stephen J. Klos Executive Vice President Environmental Research & Development Corp . Sea-Tac Office Building 18000 Pacific Highway South Seattle, Washington 98188 RE: MONTEREY TERRACE PROJECT Dear Mr. Klos: We have reviewed the background of the rezoning of the subject property and the requirement for ' an extension pursuant to the covenants. We have concluded that extending will be acceptable for the purposes of preparing an EIS . This extension is granted subject to the time schedule established below " for Master Plan application revisions and EIS preparation . Acknowledgement of this program must be received by April 1st. Pursuant to the Renton Environmental Ordinance 4-2814(B) the applicant shall pay a fee of $100 plus $25 per acre and shall deposit with the City an amount equivalent to the estimated cost of the EIS preparation, and provide payment for direct costs to the City incurred in preparation or review. Your company will circulate a request for proposal to prepare the EIS, and the City and yourselves will mutually decide upon the firm(s) who will prepare'' the EIS. All payments for !!, services will be provided by the City from your deposit. I� The following time schedule is set forth to prescribe the time limits which must be maintained to retain the existing zoning in force , and also to assist ERADCO, the City- and the EIS consultant. I � Letter to Stephen Klos March 19, 1980 Page -2- Time Schedule for Review of Monterey Terrace Project- ERADCO April 1* Commence request for proposal on EIS-ERADCO Complete staff review of Master Plan application- City April 15* Re-submit revised Master Plan- ERADCO City/applicant concurrence on consultant May 1* Acceptance of Master Plan application- City Initial deposit equal to amount of EIS proposal placed in City ac',count- ERADCO • Initial meetings on EIS- City/consultant July 1 Submit 10 copies of preliminary DRAFT EIS (preparation not to exceed 60 days)- consultant August 1 Completion of review of preliminary DRAFT EIS- (review not to exceed 30 days)- City Billing #1 for staff review costs- City August 15* Payment to EIS account for Billing #1- ERADCO September 1 Completion of final DRAFT EIS (preparation not to exceed 30 days from City comments)- consultant September 15 Concurrence in final DRAFT EIS (not to exceed 15 days form receipt)- City Commence printing DRAFT EIS- consultant October 1 Mail DRAFT EIS , commence 35 day review period- City Billing #2 for staff review costs- City October 15* Payment to EIS account for Billing #2- ERADCO November 5 End of referal period _ f' November 10 Review of comments- City/consultant December 1 Complete FINAL EISI (preparation not to exceed 21 days)- consultant Circulate FINAL EIS- City I , • L Letter to Stephen Klos March 19, 1980 Psge -3- Final billing for EIS preparation and- review- City December 8* Final payment for preparation and Review of EIS- ERADCO December 9 Public hearing on Master Plan before Hearing Examiner Unless all dates noted with an asterisk (*) are met by the applicant, the rezone application, approved by Ordinance 3113 pursuant to restrictive coynenats dated February 22, 1977, shall be deemed to have expired and the zoning shall automatically revert to previous zoning. Due to our increasing workload, this department will be using a team approach in the review of the project and EIS. I will be available for consultation on policy . issues , however , procedural and administrative details will be handled by David Clemens , Senior Planner and Steve Munson, Assistant Planner. Very my yours ' or'on Y. lcksen, Planning ii ector GYE :DRC:sh 1 • • • • L7 Environmental Research & Development Corporation - February 28, 1980 Sea-Tac Office Building • Phone: (206)244-0080 18000 Pacific Highway South • Seattle,WA.98188 "9 TO D - o .7/"-Fa Mr. Gordon Erickson Planning Director City of Renton, Planning Division Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue, South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: As indicated in our letter of February 21, 1980, we are herewith submitting a Draft Master Plan Proposal as stipulated in the Contract Rezone and Restricitve Covenant dated February 22 , 1977. Because there has been relatively little opportunity to review our proposal, we are prepared to work closely with your office to review these plans in the best interests of the City of Renton and Environmental Research & Development Corporation, respectively. The Master Plan format and material fulfill the requirements as set forth in the City of Renton Planned Unit Development Master Plan Procedures, dated September 1, 1976 . It is our understanding that this is intended to be a general document, outlining the scope of the development proposal. As indicated in the text, we expect to provide a full Environmental Impact Statement in cooperation with your department. To this end, we anticipate the submittal of more detailed analysis for your consideration. , Your counsel and suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPOATION Executive Vice President j c,ccv-\`�``" ��� SJK/jcs e/ FEB `' LOCO- /. i 7 • • r • Environmental Research & February 21, 1980 Development Corporation Sea-Tac Office Building • Phone: (206)244-0080 , 18000 Pacific Highway South • Seattle,WA.98188 • Mr. Gordon Erickson, Planning Director City of Renton , Planning Division Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is to formally request of your department an extension of 90 days. to,,.proyide•.fpr_the appropria ap teapproval processing on the 1pai °ey :Terrace Contract :Rezone i�ia`ster' Plan. It should be made clear •t'"frl't—we do intend to submit the Master Plan b the February 28th deadline to your office. This Master Plan will contain those items outlined in our memo to you dated February 2, 1980. Though we have taken what we believe to be significant steps toward complying with the Contract Rezone Covenant, we do feel it would greatly benefit all parties concerned if we could have sufficient time to review all details with your office prior to submitting the plan for hearings and final approval . We feel that it is imperative that our plan meet both the desires of the City of Renton for development of the east side as well as the financial goals of ERADCO investors. Therefore, we are formally requesting an extension for purpose of plan approval , based upon the following circumstances which have mitigated against an adequate planning process shared between our offices. 1. Late closing of property purchase: all escrowed funds were held pending closure until January 18th, 1980, thus tieing up those funds necessary to proceed with the various contracts necessary to complete the planning process. 2. Washington State SEC Stop Order: On June 11, 1979, ERADCO was served a Stop Order by the State of Washington, Securities Division. At that point in time, all efforts of ERADCO personnel were channeled toward meeting the conditions of the Stop Order and obtaining a Consent Decree whereby Monterey Terrace syndica- tion already in progress could be closed out. Said approval for Monterey Terrace sales was given and syndication was closed out October 11, 1979. It was at this time that a new team of staff were brought on at ERADCO and the Contract Rezone efforts were begun in earnest. In essence, four months were lost for -.the formulation of the necessary procedures for PUD application. • f 5 Erickson, 2/21/80 te_ • Page two • 3. Easement delay: the access easement, required in the land covenant, could not be completed until Jaduary 1980. Since lack of such an easement would jeopardize the whole project, most effort by ERADCO was focused in this direction. With the above legal , fiscal , and time constraints ERADCO was prohibited from devoting staff efforts toward meeting the planning requirements of the contract rezone until late in 1979. It was at this time, that Urban Properties Inc, was contracted to manage the planning processes necessary to meet the Master Plan submittal deadline. Though we do plan to have the plan ready for submittal , we do feel it is imperative that v._ proceed toward approval with the full support and advice of the City Planning Department. It is for these reasons then that we are requesting an extension of time to assure adequate care be given toward final plan hearings and approval . Sincerely yours, ;;ee `Y12. Roberta M. Hayhurst Property Manager RMH/d OF Rv 0 THE CITY OF RENTON U ® Z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 oNAL 4111 . BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT s'oco. 235- 2550 94TF0 SEP-C'���P MEMORANDUM February 19, 1980 TO: Warren C. Gonnason , Public Works Director FROM: Gordon Y, Ericksen, Planning Director RE: ROAD CONSTRUCTION SOUTH OF N,E, 3RD STREET BY ERADCO CORPORATION Recently, the Planning Department has noticed that a roadway is presently under construction on the east side of the Mt , Olivet Cemetery south of N.E. 3rd Street by the ERADCO Corpora- tion . The new street will provide access to property rezoned under File No. R-891-76 (Stoneway Concrete, Inc. ) . # That original approval anticipated that an access road would have to be constructed along the powerline right-of-way; how- e-er, it required review by the Hearing Examiner prior to the actual construction of the road. It appears that in July of 1979 , the Public Works Department issued a permit for the construction of the road without the approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Planning Department was totally unaware that the Public Works Department was considering such a request , Presently, the Planning Department is uncertain of the legal impact that granting a permit in apparent violation of the requirements of the rezone will have on the status of the rezone. Therefore, we would request that the Public Works Department place a stop work order on the project until a legal interpretation can be obtained from the City Attorney. RJB: wr 4 44� - of d•�c.il/�zy UPC-7 February 2, 1980 PCB Mr. Gordon Erickson Planning Director A/.' City of Renton, Planning Division ��✓ 4lr Municipal Building G 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: Enclosed is the draft of notes on the meeting held last Tuesday, January 29, 1980 in your offices regarding the Rezone Contract of Monterey Terrace. As indicated in our discussion these are presented for your approval or correction. Also., enclosed is the list from James Badoia representing his thinking concerning material to be submitted as part of the Master Plan Package. In addition we would expect to include in the package engineering analysis for storm and sanitation sewers , soils analysis , 'utilities and traffic analyses .' Also a text would expand on our general goals and objections for site development. Lastly I have enclosed a transmittal form indicating materials which we have delivered to you to date. We look forward to your comments and suggestions concerning the enclosed and our planning to date. I want to personally assure you that we will be working closely with you each step of the way, as you direct us . I hope to hear from. you presently, in order that we might plan the necessary steps and proceedures . Regards , URBAN PROPERTIES COMPANY James T. Reynolds Project Manager JTR:elj Enclosures 1934 132nd Avenue N.E. P.O. Box 6728 Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone 206 682-3678 urban I raj ort0 s gt any Date: February 1, 1980 To: Gordon Erickson, Planning Director City of Renton Planning Division From: Urban Properties Company, James T. Reynolds , Project Manager Subject: Documentation List Enclosures: 2 Remarks: Listed below are the documents delivered to your office Monday, January 29 , 1980. - Correspondence file pertaining to access road, PUD, Land Use Contract, etc. - Engineering drawings for access road - Architectural rendering, preliminary, site slope analysis Architectural rendering, preliminary, site traffic circulation plan - Architectural rendering, preliminary, site plan showing zoning and covenant restrictions and resultant site density proposals . Documents inclosed with this transmittal : - Drawing list, to be submitted with Master Plan - January 29, 1980 meeting notes - for your approval JTR:elj 1934 132nd Avenue N.E. P.O. Box 6728 Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone 206 682-3678 JOB NOTES January 29, 1980 Re: Steve Klos PUD Job No. 79107 Drawing list to be submitted for review and approval to City of Renton's Planning Department. 1. Slope Analysis - 1" = 100° Breaking down the entire property into the following catagories: 0 - 6% 7 - 15% 16 - 25% • 25% and over. 2. Composite Analysis Plan showing: Existing zoning boundries Existing vegetation Soil types Views and sun orientation Natural circulation patterns through site . Drawing scale at 1" = 100' 3. Density Analysis Plan showing: Proposed density for four distinct portions of the property. An outline of development covenants which the City and the dev&.lopes wool&-impose upon any development of the site. 4. Representative Site Plan showing: A physical interpretation of the density and covenant restrictions imposed by Zoning and by the master plan proposal . This drawing is intended to only serve as an example of the possible development permitted under the design covenants. '5. Site Sections at 1" = 20' Several sections through three portions of the site examining existing land forms, proposed grade modifications and building relationships to the site, to each other, and to the surrounding community. • • 2000 112TH AVENUE N. E. BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 454 • 3344 ' N ay an • rop, H ® s coany Memora dum To : File Date: 1-30-80 From: James Reynolds Subject : Notes on Meeting held at Renton City Planning Offices , Tuesday, January 29, 1980, 10 :30 a.m. Present : Representing the City of Renton: Gordon Erickson, Roger Blaylock, David Clemons Representing Property Owner : Roberta Hayhurst, ERADCO, George Rolfe and James Reynolds , Urban Properties Company James Badoia, Mithun Associates , Architects George Rolfe began the meeting with a brief historical sketch of Urban Properties involvement in the development of the ERADCO property indicating that UPCO was brought on as project manager in November 1979 when ERADCO felt the need for development consultation. Since coming on board several consultants have begun to gather information to assist toward the development of the Master Plan, namely: a soils expert, traffic consultant, and Robert Thorpe, who is assisting with environmental issues . George- further addressed the access road issue, indicating the Developer's desire to work closely with the planning department, and hoping that previous misunderstandings will not work to the detriment of the project completion. Gordon Erickson spoke briefly to the nature of the restrictive covenant and it' s requirements regarding the content of and time frame for the submittal of a Master Plan. He indicated the City was accepting February 28, 1980 as the Master Plan submittal target date. It was further pointed out by Mr. Erickson that extensions of this target date were possible, with the proper supporting documenta- tion. It was reiterated, relative to several issues by Mr. Erickson that in order to facilitate the smooth processing of our proposals that all issues concerning the proposal and Master Plan completion should pass before the Planning Department. Mr. Erickson pointed out both the desirability and the requirement that his Department carry out the interface with other City Departments , rather than the developers performing this. task. The issue of subdivision and platting of the property was discussed briefly. Mr. Erickson pointed out the necessity of exploring the ramification should the developers decide to subdivide, that is , road 1934 132nd Avenue N.E. P.O. Box 6728 Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone 206 682-3678 Memorandum To File mif January 30, 1980 Page Two specifications, etc. Mr. Rolfe indicated that the present state of_ the developer' s planning had not fully discussed this issue, while Mr. Erickson indicated that platting was not a requirement for completion of the Master Plan. James Badoia presented several plans to indicate the direction of the developer' s thinking to date. These plans included a slope analysis , a composite of traffic circulation within the plot, and a preliminary site plan with density indications . Relative to site access during construction Mr. Erickson indicated that it would very likely be possible to use Blaine Avenue for small vehicle access , while larger vehicles would use the new access road. This utilization of the Blaine Avenue access would have to meet time frames acceptable to both the city and the residents of Monterey Terrace. To date the developers have turned over to the planning department the following materials : Correspondence file pertaining to the access road, PUD, Land Use Contract, etc. Engineering drawings for the access road Slope analysis draft Composite site plan, showing in site circulation patterns and housing density. Next steps include: The developers will submit a list of that data which they plan to submet as part of the Master Plan. The developers request the Planning Department to respond to this listing, indicating changes necessary or deficiencies . The developers will complete an Environmental Impact Check List, nd request a City determination regarding an EIS. Mr. Erickson indicated that his department will respond to all material submitted as quickly as possible but wanted us to recognize office work load and potential delays in response,. From his perusal of the material pertaining to the access road, the preliminary drawings submitted of the site analysis and composition, Mr. Erickson indicated he would offer his response regarding the developer 's progress to date, potential pitfalls and areas for further work. JR: elj Avi OF R4,11, fir OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON POST OFFICE BOX 626 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON, WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 � � _ p peY �' LAWRENCE J.WARREN, CITY ATTORNEY DANIEL KELLOGG, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 134 CO' 0ItE0 SEP-C° August 21, 1979 ‹c OF RF��,. * PECEIVEb , v 2� AUG 24 9 F [ft Mr. Stephen Mills yy„ DE151 Transamerica Title Insurance Co. 222 Williams Renton, Washington 98055 Dear Steve: Could you please issue the City final Title Insurance on the two parcels they recently acquired from Kent- Highlands, Inc. , formerly Stoneway Concrete, Inc. These two parcels are covered under your Order No. 427310 and 427303. You could also forward a bill along to me for the insurance and I will promptly remit the same to the City of Renton. Very truly yours , Lawrence J. Warren LJW:nd cc: Mayor Council President PLanning Director a0 THE CITY OF RENTON c. , MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 o CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 q. 235-2550 • 4TF0 QFp1E�® • October 27, 1978 Marcus K. Partin Vice President Real Estate Planning Division • Environmental Research & Development Corporation Sea-Tac Office Building 18000 Pacific Highway South Seattle, Washington 98188 RE: R-891-76, STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. , ORDINANCE 3113 • Dear Mr. Partin: We have reviewed the covenants dated February 22, 1977, relating to the above referenced item. The covenants require approval of a master plan by February, 1979, and substantial development by February, 1980. The covenants further provide for extension of these time periods by the Planning Department for reasonable cause. We have evaluated your six reasons for considering the requested exten- sion provided in your letter of October 18, 1976, and compared them to the original concerns expressed at the time of the rezoning action. . The timing requirement appears to have been established to insure continuity in the development process from rezoning through construction. The basic request for additional time to provide for proper planning of the project appears to be consistent with the original rezone approval . However, the requested 18 months does appear to go beyond the original intent. There- fore, based upon the fact that ERADCO is a prospective new owner, the access roadway plans have just been completed, and good planning princi- • pals suggest that alternatives be developed and considered, the Planning Department extends time limits specified in covenants for one year. Therefore, a master plan for the total development is required to be approved by the City by February, 1980, and construction commenced by February, 1981. If you have any questions, please feel free to call . Very t ul yours, Gordgn Y`. Er>i ek36, Planning Director if/ Da fd R.. CldMensc Associate Planner DRC:wr I _ f • October 18, 1978 Environmental Research & Development Corporation Sea-Tac Office Building • Phone:(206)244-0080 18000 Pacifip Highway South • Seattle,WA.98188 Mr. David R. Clemens and Mr. Michael Smith, Chief Planners • 0 r �� City of Renton, Planning Division ;;�` C� !\ �" Municipal Building 76,, RI_1.I, %� � • 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 3CT 231978 \Re: Ordinance #3113 ^ ���-�"'"'""""�� <v Gentlemen: Pursuant to my discussion with you on October 13, 1978, this letter is a formal request for an extension of the land use contract which expires in February, 1979, and is included in the above referenced zoning ordinance. It would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to formulate and implement an effective development plan by this date. We will require at least 18 additional months to complete our site research and to create a quality development plan for property being purchased from the Stoneway Company. II We feel that such an extension is in order for the following reasons : 1 . As the prospective new owner of the property, Environmental Research and Development Corporation (ERADCO) has insufficient time to complete necessary research and planning before the current contract expires. li 2. Only recently have final plans meeting city specifications of an access road to the N.E. corner of the subject property completed the review and revision process. 3. The access problem is further complicated by the restrictive covenant on the property limiting access to Blaine Avenue N.E. Additional time is necessary to develop a harmonious access plan that can be presented to the city and residents of Monterey Terrace for review and approval . 4. Adequate planning time prevents the ill effects that can be generated by a plan that is developed in haste in order to meet a suspense deadline. 5. It is the desire of ERADCO to minimize the impact of site development and construction activity upon the surrounding community. Additional preparation time will assure ERADCO an . opportunity to investigate a substantial number of alterna- tives, and choose the best of many instead of the best of a few. fl -2- 6. An 18 month extension of the land use contract does not appear to adversely affect anyone related to the subject property, including the city planning department, the neighboring com- munity, and the owners. However, it does appear to enhance the predictability of the nature, degree, and direction of future development and the peripheral effects and demands II generated by that development. Thank you for your consideration of this request. An early response will be appreciated. ih Sincerely, Ma cus K. Partin Vice President Real Estate Planning Division MKP:ma . • 4 4 �► 0 THE CITY OF RENTONC. ' `% 7. -MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT 13 O,Q �Q` 235-2550 4TFO SFP���� June 7 , 1977 Robert DeBoer Stoneway Concrete , Inc . P . 0. Box 509 ' • Renton , WA 98055 Dear Mr . DeBoer: I RE: ACCESS ROAD FOR STONEWAYICONCRETE COMPANY PROPERTY Pursuant to your request , the Planning Department and Public Works Department have reviewed the location and improvement requirements for a proposed access road from N . E . 3rd Street to the Stoneway property just south of Mt. Olivet Cemetery . It is our recommendation that the proposed street consist of 64 feet of dedicated right-Df-way , which should be suf )\, - ficient to provide a minimum 44 foot curb-to-curb width . Standard improvements could be developed as a phased program with initial construction at a lessfer width . It would also be necessary to determine the extent of the public right-of- way portion of the roadway that would be sufficient to serve the general area . This requirement is based on the potential developmental- density of the subject site , together with the comprehensive plan designation for a future boulevard street to serve anticipated additional residential and recreational densities for the area . • While there are some sight restrictions at N . E. 3rd Street due to a vertical curve on the , uphill side , the proposed location does not appear to create any significant sight distance problems . Signalization will. ultimately be ' , required at N. E. 3rd Street , when traffic demands warrant it. Adequate provisions will also be required to handle storm drainage from the proposed street. We hope that this will . assist you in planning the subject access road. You should submit proposed plansfor our review and approval . 0 i . ' GI-1 - , � - Robert DeBoer June 7 , 1977 Page Two If you have any questions , please do not hesitate to contact this department or the Public Works Department . Very truly yours , Gordon Y . Ericksen Plan „i ng,•Di r-ctor, --C ems, � f ...z , Michael L . Smith Associate Planner MLS : wr cc : C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor W. C . Gonnason , Public Works Director Hugh G . Goldsmith • 1 r.' . //I/ 7-71/_...... ... _......... i \ . . . / / •c-, \ • . ' ./ ''''`. \ ,,. •• • N'' ,--- •.----' .. , • ' ...-•' . „.„---- 'Nf '/ // ,• (' . - . •". - ..--.------..-.. . ---- • ---,....- . ..„--- ,-- _,.• --- .. '. . , \ • „\'-----•-• ----..-. --_.,- -0? "'. . - ' ,- - _,-,-• -• \A -\.. . . .;- ---_ -- ,• -,, , ........._:___ ...._ .....,•--- '9 ---. iii , , • -0 f.. - •--"--- --.---:'- ''' ''''''''''LLL---------' - ' 4 :\ .1.%'',...:•'•jL,-=`..LL'I.3 ,--- ."--.-11\AC:)11...".?.7i L:-_:1 , •.r. , ': : 7 '.., .... , . . - •— J V- \ , . . ------------. .. ., . i .11., 1:.:'•;',...',.''!..ii.;,:.,.!:.,: ,... .. 11 PRI)' J E(.... Ti • , ;; " ., , . , ....' -• • .•,,,‘. • • . , . • / . k•'1 : . : .;'. , 66 . : .; .. .:, .. , , ', . ' NBC-A • il • . • , . f,'I V. ',' .. . . . .-----,-1- .7.-.-7*--Jr.-rri---i-•:=7:::L-7::••-::—. 1-: I. ‘.;,•',,•':1. . 1 1' . .... . • • ' • , •.. . \ s•-•„._. 1../1:1 .C.)1,1\./1 i'..:-I' '1 '1 i .01 , • ,• ;,INC.ri . '\, - . ' 1 \ • . ,,,:'L''), . _... . • 1 • '''•-•-•. C 1 .1'-4•11.----1. r.VY ..., _____.......... . . . 1 .., .,. / / \ • 1.1 \ .:\ .. \ . . . . _ ..___ , ,. •.. ,:. ( \ , . '.!.... -...-..,,- -.)!...‘.i.-:,.,:i>.:(' / , I . \Z \ , \ / / _. .. II / . .. .. -• \ •I:- • . ._ . .._s.. ._. . , . , .„ .. . . \ . s'`.....'- • \'‘, \' .\ \ . : ' \ ' \ • s) '1 '; '\., ,' . t f .. `s. • ..._ • '\) 1C- 11\ I T Y MAP • • .. • ..: .. . . . . . . C.,CALE: ‘" , 400' • .• . • , . . • • , . . . , . . • .. . . ...., ' . . . . . • . . . . .. . 1 . : • 2 % r-Abpiis's,0:i Tze..c.s . . . . . . • • . . . . ....,,,. . . : . . . . . . . . . . . • .. • . • , . . . . • • . , . . - —"S. 4:1•14..-1-41- ?...C1/44,Li f sr • . ... . • • , •• ,.•• .•. ..,.. : • .,. • •• . .. . .. . . . . " •. 1 i- --: . . .:. - . • • •,• 1 ,.,.. . . . . • • ., •. . • . .. . .. • . ,. • .. ..- . ... . • • .•.•••,•„ • : '• .-. '' ••• `:,•;•.,' ' '.•.; •i; • . . . . . ' '... :.•.1 • • ' '•''' ' ' ;'."-.: ::•.!1:,•r.',..:1:, ••.,•..,...•,• 4- . .... . , • . • . .. • . •• •• , , . • • • ., - • . .. . .. ,. , . . ., .• • • • , . . .• . , . . . . . . RFCENED MAY 31 07 -9,y d MEMORANDUM e \'��G Is` May 31 , 1977 TO : GORDON ERICKSEN Planning Director Attention: Mike Smith FROM: WARREN GONNASON Public Works Director RE : ACCESS FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE PROPERTY Pursuant to your memo of May 19 , the following comments are made relative to the provision of access for the development of the Stoneway Concrete property located southerly from NE 3rd Street as per your..sketch. As I understood it , the proposed' R-2 and R-3 development on the Stoneway property could involve as many as 200-300 residential units . A two-lane roadway facility would be adequate to serve the population from such a development . You did indicate , however, that there is additional potential development in the area to the east that could be 'served by such an access road, and it would be appropriate to have that portion of the roadway that serves the larger area have a curb -to--curb width of 44 feet to allow for turning movements and storage at the 'intersection with NE 3rd Street . Ultimately signalization would probably be required at NE 3rd Street when traffic demands require this . Therefore , right-of-way sufficient to provide 44-foot curb-to- curb width should be. provided at the .outset, and initial construction could be programmed to a lesser width. This should be a dedicated public right-of-way of 64 feet in width; and while there are some sight restrictions at NE 3rd Street due to a vertical curve on the uphill side , we do not anticipate this would create any sight distance problems . Adequate provisions would be required for handling the drainage waters from such a development , and the developer should submit proposed plans for our consideration and approval,,; and alignment as shown on your vicinity map would appear to be acceptable . 6) (2' C!jeen,,putpc..tArft. WCG: cah cc: Mayor Delaurenti Del Bennett Dick Houghton if fir' � .L. 4 AA. � �► THE CITY OF RENTON J `/ MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING I)EPA HT NI ENT p cq- 235-2550 ,P.'kb SEPIE4%O MEMORANDUM May 19 , 1977 TO : Warren Gonnason , Public Works Director FROM : Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director By : Michael Smith , Associate Planner RE : ACCESS FOR STONEWAY CONCRETE PROPERTY Stoneway is desirous of obtaining access to the recently rezoned property as soon as possible due to a pending sale to a development firm. They have discussed the matter of utilizing a portion of the Puget Power Transmission line R/W _ with puget , and are working with Mt . Olivet Cemetery on the / - remaining- portions .- - — A l t h o u-g-h— the-r e -i-s— a--planned -future p u b l i-c / R/W in the approximate area a temporary private access might be possible in the interim with agreement to participate in ;' a future public road . A map is attached indicating the approximate location of the proposed private access road . We would appreciate your review and response to several questions including ; 1 . What is the extent of the improvements to be required at this time? 2 . Will the proposed location of the intersection with N . E . 3rd Street present any problems in terms of sight distance and turning movements ? 3 . Any other requirements or problems that your department would foresee for the proposed access road ? We would appreciate your response as soon as possible so that Stoneway can continue its negtiations with the various parties involved . If you need additional information or wish to meet regarding this matter please advise . MLS : LML Attachment I -f, I r-- ..h. , . . 7 ._.... .......... .....____ . 77 :1 1 1 // I ' `,7 ' .',\.. 'N. • .ts• .. ......•-' /,,, ' c.` ....• ..-----• . --- , -- ..-- .,- ---. 10 . ,... .••-• ,_ ------ , ..../ . ..— . . _ ... / .` ---,.....1: ....._._. ... .. \ ......._... ..• . ._ _'...--- ..-A..•• _.....-- fi) YIN. .-. ,._.....-- ........-:: -''..7.7''—'' -- —:', ./ 7 \ i' tii'l \ • '.."-----------_-__.—. .:::-......---------./.'-,•(/•-• '''' .;r"----------'''' ' i'-- •• ' .:4:1 ELa LT.11 trza rs.--a c2.-„3 c:1 C.-.3 L- -• < . -": , A7,,1 T I•A . ,,,. , •. u .... . \--- . . ../ ''',' PRE)i EC-T •:, ,,. • . . ,, 1 ' N,;\,-;N, 1 .c.7...,.... tr s. •.. ': ?.!•:" ii i • I. .1' . t" ...• i<INCTI, \ •,i , 1 , kkl , • .:••...,,i MV CTLV I.::-I . '. I . ',...LT), • . 1 ., , ,A .. ) ] ' `.. ' , //7 .' i• • 'II-‘ •' - .., • . , .•., / y• 1 / ..... ... . .. .......__. _. . . . --- •A ., ., : .:s II .• \. I r ‘ -.1),•\ CZ.'"Is R-3 . ' 4 - / _ 1 // ._. _... .......„...... _._ . . . , / .. _. . . . . .-... . . `, \ . \ i I \ • NICINITY MAP , . . , .. , •. / . . ',CAL E k" •:,. 4 001 [ • .. ' ..... _ .. . „ • . . . .53 "rrzaws.,,i.,ss,o:J T3...CS 1 i• , ..... : • • '11 ' , . . .. • . . ST .• . , , . • ' '4- • .. ff.' `'-' • .. " :JO 4:.;144',.., c.!,,, " • ‘; • •. . ..• ;, ." ..',R , .''''-'1. . • . I • ' '.. ...,.. •.(•'1'.. .,: ?;',i! ,0 " ''• • . . . . :, I ' .. '' )•,1 ..:...c..,:..t,, . : . ., . ' ".'..t .'' : '' " '•:Pe? ':;',A':. .,. ,,,•:.„ 4'1.! . , ... • • , .. . • . _ . . ., . .• , . • • . . ,, . . • . . . . . , • . . . . . .. .„ .. , • • ••., • - ' • . . . • • • ' . ' . - „ , . . • .. . . , .• • • • • , • if dl _ i a. 1: 74` -pf,OieMP 2,�eel 114) a ,o a a A Q. 99) — " 1 m?117111 a l NA1/L. 20.,14yrip 1,6 5- 4..-•e --1 0 oi .C4/.7i7 -,:ifp.,24, --aryafrg -- ,,,,- awq, nif STA )S 74 l@N -- LI • Pali 49 M o ,- - r . •1"ol, v s/favr'o y T u a viol a "e:...v., ill?) — )1111 Gate) ---- __________I II r\ v 7-7 s rre vsra0QA$41 -a avesA eidlil I �s SpfearrIS ' t.4.4 iv, ...)low‘L L 1 -ritat-1" ...-- , ,i . 'I* A IG —7, par? (2/. --72--er--4Y-y- r )-%-rv..0.01441..r: pi yr, i , P . ‘7 an )457 dx,s7 yr° mle;4 /jai (vb, of — ' I, II ---J c i _. ,,,_ --wei i \ ;f 7-efee-i4-ar -2, 'rravi rpm ----r - rfevrio -00m r-PQA 7r^I IIJI $111 if 54p , , ,. it-s7)19031.; z tea' 'M IW IL i/ i ill 07,4, e uJ.Q/ „ CO THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL.BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 o o °? CHARLES J. DELAURENTI, MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT co' p� ��� 235—2550 4TEO SE PI MEMORANDUM April 27 , 1977 TO : Files FROM: Michael L . Smith , Associate Planner RE : STONEWAY CONCRETE, REZONE SITE I met today with Bob DeBoer of Stoneway Concrete , Inc. , and Hugh Goldsmith , his engineer, regarding future development potentials for the site. Mr. Goldsmith mentioned possible platting of the property and sale of smaller portions of the site to individual developers . I indicated that this was not the intent of the rezone approval and restrictive cove- nants . According to these documents , the subject site is to be master planned through the P. U. D. ordinance with a first phase for specific initial site planning and develop- ment . I further indicated that it may be possible to sub- divide concurrently with the P. U. D. concept . • We also discussed the status of the access road, required ' improvements , standards , and dedication . Mr. DeBoer said he has been working with Puget Power and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and is making progress . I said that we would have to deter- mine the specific requirements for construction of a street from N . E . 3rd St. to the Stoneway property . I said that we would check out what the requirements would be . It appears that it is Stoneway ' s intention to develop the street as a condition prior to sale of thel property to a developer. MLS :wr cc : G. Ericksen z nv,o c e No 596 CITY OF RENTON 1, . 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 CITY CLERK Department or Division Date Maxch 11, 1977__�__. Please make checks Stoneway Concrete, Inc . payable to P . 0. Box 509 Finance Department Renton, Wash . 98055 City of Renton L Attn: Mr . Robert H . DeBoer ---------------- Declaration of Restrictive Covenants ( recording fees ) $4 . 00 Ordinance #3113 Rezone File # R-891-76 Recording # 7703010782 copies attached Total D u e .___$4 . 00 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 3113 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON , WASHINGTON , CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF RENTON FROM , RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-1) AND SUBURBAN RESIDENCE DISTRICT (S-1) TO RESIDENCE DISTRICT (R-1 , R-3 and R-4) WHEREAS under Chapter 7 , Title IV (Building Regulations) ' of Ordinance No. I626 known as the "Code of General Ordinances of , the City of Renton" , as amended, and the maps and reports adopted in conjunction therewith, the property hereinbelow described has heretofore been zoned as Kesidence District (R-1) and Suburban Residende ' , District (S-1) ; and WHEREAS a proper petition for change of zone classification of said property has been filed with the City Clerk on or about October 11, 1976 , which petition was duly referred to the Planning Commission , for investigation, study and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held thereon on or about November 10 , 1976 , and which matter was continued to January 19 , 1977 , and having been duly considered', , by the Planning Commission and said zoning request being in conformity with the City' s Comprehensive Plan, as amended, and the City Council , having duly considered all matters relevant thereto, and all parties , having been heard appearing in support thereof or in opposition thereto, NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO , ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I : The following described property, in the City of Renton is hereby rezoned to Residence District (R-1, R-2 , R-3 and , R-4) as nereinbelow specified; the Public Works Director and the Planning Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the maps of the Zoning Ordinance, as amended, to evidence said rezoning , to-wit See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as if fully set forth herein, (Property located east of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) .south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet' Cemetery and west cf Bonneville Power Right of Right) SUBJECT, HOWEVER,. to that certain "DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS" dated February 2 , 1977 which is incorporated." herein and made a cart ,hereof as if fully set forth, and which said: .::' ' ' . ' .:'`;, Declaration is recorded in the office of Director of Records and. Elections ,: King County Receiving No. SECTION "II: This Ordinance shall be effective upon its+,, .::: Z,'.;'.;,� passage, approval and five ( 5) days after its publication. ' PASSED BY.; THE. CITY COUNCIL this 28th day of February, 1977 .; :': _,a,,,,z,t,d2_, a ....,....._ -, _____.L...,: ,,, , Delores A. Mead , City Ci rk" APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 28th day of February, '1 Charles J7' Delaurenti, Mayor Approved as to form: , k };' G..rard "M. u S ellan, J City Attorney m., ,. is `, Date of Publication: March 4 , 1977 /' • • s ' ' i r`'4 r illt;,k5+r',,�1 • 11 II r1ih:' • • . . • EXHIBIT:, . A ' ' i• . _ �°';: :• '. PARCEL 11 A. • - ,• ' ' : T.he' `west .8'S'0 .32'' .;fe:et: oif,;. thee-:''north 1 00 'fe.et the west r:.:`: • 850. 32, feet-being • me,asure'd 'a'Ilong','the. North 1 i.ne , nd' the north .• 1:00 `f.e;e't b;ei:ng• 'mea'.s:ure'd ,a't•::,;rti gh-t.; angles to.the Noi••th 1'°i:ne:): ' oaf t:h•ejfol l owi ng'.fdescri;bed Ma i n 'tract ' 'MA'I:`• :�' RACT� },. N:' T i • . ., f;'. e- uarter :an'd 'o , th,a`t'` or.tion:: of �th'e North.east on q _'Gov 'rn'me•nt Lo,t.s 7 .and .8 =withi.n Section :17,; Tow_ hshi.p.°23 1' . . ,: S n' e 5' ''`East W 'M' descr'i.bed as .foll'ow , • - u rl�t lyd, �il F 11 Beg,i..nni'ng aft the:: Sou.thwwe:st co:rn'er of the Southe•ast,W one- ,ref ,,„ ,;t,rt ,tr uarter:•:of The-•Northeas' g'1.`' ,• �x ;q 1't �:one-q'uar`ter :o'f 'sa�i.d. Section 1::7 , ` i � , thence north' al:or;"^l the ''West l'i•ne of said•..subdi vi s.i.on `:��;� e' .di s:t'a:nce• of •'252 43 f :et :to the • true ,point• of begin ni.n'g'• ' `.•' ,,,{::, 'saldpoint also C:e's:i"gnated • as.,`:P• 'o.int "A" ;,, 'thence sou'tf1''•'`;`. ::; :;; i:'; :.• ' :•8'9;0.45, 1.7 east-. a.:>-`distance •:o f •5'�2 6.•41 feet , 't hen ce :south': f_',-;:•;:'�!`t' °` 4 f an a 'of '799 feet' ::to• ,t'he' .East ,1•:i n.e t;:: ,-, :8�8 5 2. 0;4� "ea�s t'. a -,d'i s,t c �`:'` i�.� : s a i`d Ea S t' l'i n e ',,t0,:'t h e: :o,f''.S-ee`..., � •1••.7•i :.the.•nc.e' ',s,oia''tb -a;1on."9 r>>:',.•;' • East ;o.ne:- u.ar't'e:r: corner :of Section 17•' ;.t.he.nce':'•c'on't;i'nou'i`n 't. :,. . ;s;'•�'ry'''^• 's'outh'- along the;` East",,line ,of• said • section to 'an i:n,t.e'rs'ec "°'r' ' ' ti°'on^,wi.t'h• 't.he Northerly right'-of-way, "l• ine of • State• Road : Ia`r'` M ,f' No:.. '5. '(St S R #169) (Ma' Val ley Hi.g'hway=) ;; 'then.ce. -, 'n_• „' ;`,':.',: <; : general Northwe'ster1 I o"i'recti`on al on :sai.d' .Nor.,therl I,`n.,` 'y ' - right-of-wayline'•. 'to an'' `:i.ntersection with `a line that • '„,'.' :.;.,,s,,^,: lies No.r. th" .89.°:45 ' 1'7" west a :di stance ' of:,65.3 : 91 fee"t. .f'rom : ; r•. - P_oi.nt' 'IA"... :thence' Solith 8'9 45` 1'7 , east' a .d.i stance,' :.of: ::::';''':.: .'s,s-; '~:.:, :, • .: 65 39a' feettoP.oin`t ":A" and the :tr'ue ''noint` 'of ,be inning: :y .:.; `';"< :, , ; ,` ; '+i,..,=,,;'<;;;:;yt; is l A 1 i ng::,.'with:i n th:e' ..G`reen;' <'•':;:; ',;•;i:' Exc-ep;t: :a,n;y, .p.orti on of said Par�c'e y , , , ,•. „�.�,,, • • • belt, a'r.'ea:f•':as'': .show:n'•,on. th•e Comprehensive Plan revision d:a•tke,d-.,.,°'; :":•';;;,'.;`:';;,,fir•;': ;':Y': P,, •M• ay;' 17;,", '1;9T2 : said' Greenbelt' area also known .•as . P'arcea', "Et'`' ;ri P R C E L. 6., rs't;_:•;;,:r:r:,;.:.;' A a t:fe,,`i'�orth=':l ne " >. The; 'wes.t •`:1T80.'32 feet , as measured long ,,•::' following ,d•es-c'ri-bed•"-ma n tract . ?'",;,'•,AI .,�, • • • MAIfN TRACT 1 • 1, " A'1,1'` that'•'p,orti on o`f' the No'rtheas''t one-,quarter "a'nd'',;of ' Government:,.Lot's•- 7 ,and • 8: wi•thi,n Section 1.7 ; To'wnshi:o ;'.,;•S;'�1'�:. 23 :•No;rt'h;. .•Range •5 'East`,'• W M .• described ,a�s follows ',P• ° ',, thwe•st. corner o.'f; •the. $ou:t'hea5t:.,on,e;- ' :" ....,.:i`n:ni.n:g':..•at .the` Sou '':,,•.' ; , ',; ;: • uart'er .of the Northeast ''one-q'ua:rte'r of'';sa:id: •.Se.c:t;i:on.:'1'•7 ;, ��',' o n g h e°. West' 1 i n e o f. .., • ;, ,; ,, .;, th.e n,c'e no r.t h' a 1 g t s a'i d 's.0 bd i,v is s.i`o;n `a': '•,;;:., 'f,•,•: . distance '•of .`25,2-:23 feet -to 'thee true, point •'of :b'e`gi`nn:i'ng;;' ' : 1 .,,: i':, tr said point .also 'designated as '.Poi.n't`. "A" , then'ce.' south ,. 89°451:17 east a distance of 526 : 41 . feet thence south :,';'; } J °I'• ' 38 'S2 04,' easta, di stance of 799 feet.:ao 'th''e East. ,:1,�;ne'•':,•z, ;.�F• •,;.;. of Sect'i'on'•• 17 ; thence south along , said ' Ea-st line to the : _ ` 'E ' r East one-quarter :corner,', of •. $e'c't i on':: 17,;'•.':t'hence,,.continuing• ',`,' ':;s -.,;:.';�;'.„ : south.: along :the -East .'line .of. said section: to�'_.a,n'.:.,ii:ntse•r,s:ec;'•::.'; fij„': ''' h, •, ' ' , ti'on 'with. the Nort'herly-' right-of-way.•'.l:i..n.e .of•f State R.o'ad. �' ::i"`.,'r No . 5 (Set : S .'R . #1.69) `(Map`le Valley Highway) ; ..thence: •,a.n'. ;: r'I),,; .,.; ' . a general •Northweste'rly,'. direction 'al-ong said Norther'l ' ,,,...``'�•' y'' ,a, ' right-of-way 1ine to an intersection withe 'a 1'inee .,t=hat ;�' ��.�;:. 0 lies -North 89 .45 ' 17" west 'a: distance o:f. 6'53,: 91 fe;et r :,;`:;;,;: ,;:! Po:i nt' "A." ; then'ce. •South' 89°,45 ' 17 " easSt a,:'d i'stan'ce, ' o•f• 1, ',j`ir, s ' • 653 . ,9:1 -feet to Point ".A" and the' true 'point: •of begin• ning `i'" k a 1 ,j •_ b. 1• _ ::1:'i;}.v.:,12i1,;ti:14,,,�{.rl,,,•f�' xI • r l.''n r :4'P`b. rk M.: d•1'Yi 1'':i'i • t 1 I^'..' di• �I f .l r 1,r' _ .If: `` I I' •t �i �«a 1 rl I�• r: i •I �Sv •r • ,'.f�..i,ti - I•1 ':Y h' �n: of��``sa'a:d Parcel B :wi t•.hi •G .E' e'e' t" 'a n: o'r't' o. �" x Y 9'` �ti:, 'r.r� t 'n�o:rth' 100 fe'.et 'of .the� 'w.ea•t:-:`'8P5.0 '32 feet ,, as' `mea`sured� at-' 1g. , s.:e: rce ti:on '.'„';'. an '1 es: `.to. and 'a.l•o:n the Plo,r'th l 'i ne the;reof:. Th x, p ��r 'II �also ..kn'o'wa` ,as, Pa,r jai• A SO except an- portion 'of said Parc.e•l " B`" 'lyin"g, ."wi:t.h,in :,the Gr- eenb'e3t';':area';.a:s:-•sh,ow'n:l :`on' 'the Comprehensive`;P',1'..an '.rev';i':s`io:;n, 1':'<::'..1,::• • - k.n'own"a'q.„,, Pja:rcel r d'at e d ..M'a° -. ;117':,; ]'9,�7.2 a i Gr'le.e,;n b e t area 1 s�:o y :: , r , d 11 II ...:"., `: E - . r P AR C E vr: s me'a"su 'ed a1 on the No,rrth: "1 i ne : ... :.T.h'e�,'e'as''.t:.,7.9 9. .fe'e;t a t r g ,,,,.,...,,,,,„„A,,,, ;;�':h�,� :��'..,_+:. ;f,. �t r r v •y,;c,!.;• •.� rill-':"i'''t'�1,` .`(/i'e: 'a r',,t,!,r r•..MA I'N T<R T'. ' r :Y. er a�n or. heast =one' �uar't ;,,. A1'1�. a:hat''' or.ti.on': Hof.. fh.e:' N t >:,. ,7' -and 8' within •Section '1:7 Townshi: 2,3. G;oV';e'.rn:ment''L,ots:'' P:.`' North" R'an a ;5, E<ast W`: M described as ..fol 1 ows ,; i " "h'e, Southwest :corner of, the • So'ufh,eaat::',o'n ;A. aid 'Se o''►i :>1':Z, �a' .'.ter'<:o.f�„1't;h,e°''No':rahea`st-'St uarter .of:. s "'� ' q u r,:,,. q . ,�'fin;;:;.:6�li:�"Lj��':I,,.°;�;,;. ,� s bd i v'i::s.i'o'n:: a`:�':;`.:: '.;,.., r ' ;t'he`nce' ;rio'rt•h' 'a�l:o;ngt� �a<he' .West._ l.,i:ne • of said u '.: distance .of ;2-52 23 'feet ';,to the' true point of•,:.beginning';; 'I' said ''''point also ;design ate d as'. Point ''"A ; :•.the'n•'ce sout,h " :(Y^ �i1� ; ''.'I,; `'89045 ,�1•.1'. 'east : a;`,.'di s:tanee of 5.2:6 41 feet • the,n'ce •:s,,o t<h'�,..,%: ``;�.;: ;,, .,,;,':.'::+:1' o ' ' 88e5`2-•'•;.04"• -east a-';-distance .of 799-feet' to -t:he E'a.s-t•-`:l inei -�' 1`^i` 1�4f ' s' th .a'1'on said 'East •1 ,ine:: ei ;;'': ,o f'"_Secai'on ,1 T:; Thence. ou. g 'to<':f•h ,;;' ;'`r ,l:;,;::rr, ., East ':,o'n`e:- .u•a'rt'er corner of Section 17,;. t he,ne' con•ti-.n`ui'::ng`*' n he '_East . 1.'i.:ne of said •:s'ect.io'.n,''to'''•'a;n •-i.nt:e:.rs•ec= „;.„;i ,,,,.,:, south :al o g, t. !: 't'h .h'e `Nor'ther1 r.i h`t-of-wa °li'n'e of:''Stattre:;,Road-;` ' s •''r:r t',i'q n' ':�i i. t Y 9 r y r:, •'..::::�, S :,R: ,.` T 6 9 1M a.p 1 e: ValleyHighway) , .t h e•n c,e',`°:�i�n^'`' '. a Northweste'rlr'' dir.,ecti'on axon s::aid Nor,the°rl: ' • a; g e:n;e'r 1 y: g'r. "; "` .'righ.t;-of';way: line to' an .`:intersection w'i th'` a- l.;i ne`,<that l es:'-";North :89945 ' 17":' welst . a distance- 'of "653 .'9'1 feet from' ,�N,' Point. "A'.' thence South' .8:9045'' 17" 'east 'a' distance :of ' � 6'5•3 9'1'• If'e e t 't o 'Point "'A,"•" .and '•the true; p o i n't o,.f' beginning , ,,,' ,;';„,: P r c e•1 c. • r.i n' w.... . ...,., t E x c e .a;:;,a nportion o f. sa'i:d a . Greenbelt ,area' as shown: on ,the Comprehensive Plan. ,re:viJs.i`o:ri:' ;': ' s:+;. t 17 � ., . .., e , F.,�;, is i`d:.,Gre:enbe1:t 'are' a'1•so known as;' :P.a,.r..crel'': ` �,5>;;: d a t.ed':_'Ma 1�7.•, -19.7 2,; `s a. �� �'�'� : � . ;,,..4; Y E. 'i¢'L ti r1 I J. r;t'i'' ..+ ,t" are:a°'� •',known 'as' Parc•-'e1: D and mo.�r;e, 'a c` >;{: AL`S�0'� 'ex'"cep �t:h:e:' p.. ;': w: ,;', 'd s�:rol l o s� • 'u l'a'•r�l d:e s'c r`i,b•e. �a. f. • 1 . Beginningat `:the North:east corner, of The abovees'crr ed` � �:-�, m ain: tract Thence :',sout:h,er=ly • along :;the• easterly l'in'e;'••thereof 'a.'`d.i;:s:tanc.'e;';: ;'' "". ' of •300 .f,e'e:t: to'. :t•h.e 'true poinr.t of beginning ; •'thenc:e '•wees'terly :,,;,;,,,: ,?:'' para'l Tel .wi'th the' North line of • the main "tract ",herein It described• a distance':o:f 300 feet to an 1i'nter:s'ect'i'o:n 'wit ' '``I y ;;. ": . • a .Line which i s parallel with and 300' fe,e`t w'ester.ly'! o,f., as :measured '''at r'i-g,ht.,anig1 es• 'to ,, • the 'e'a'st. ;line• of said' ',. ,",.."' ' - main .'tract ; thence southerly along:•sa;i:d' p.a'ra'11. el• ':1-'•ine: 'to `ti;'' . �:,,,,, . an 'in•tersec•tion= with ':t`h'e northeasterly 'li,ne' .`of' the± ;Gre:en- f:' :11,f;:� : �;;> • belt area • a's 's.hown.'o:n, :;t.he• Compre'hensi;v'e''..'P�:l;an, r'evi's'io'n• :';;>,t , dated •May 17•, 1.972 , said • Greenbelt' .ar.e.ai:-a:lso: known gas ' {':"'„,,,,f ,a,,.. Parcel " E" ; •thence •southeas ter ly along•,,.the: •'1orther:ly. line '" ' of " said Greenbelt area ''to an i ntersect :on,,� with the>'Eas:.t,i`'';.' ' .['' `' • • - ' lin•e.°'of said main' tract; thence n;orthe';r.'a•y.., along;: 'the.:•' East.' .. `:,:;r,�:':j;;, ;� ' ' ' „r line :t'h'ereof a 'di stance of 800 feet more or. less ,to`: '.th'e:'' •.:,.:0:;', ,! o i n t-...o f .b e i n n i n i P, 9 . 9 . „il: ,� ir-,,: ' 1;1.1 .. ' _ , .. r r _ /:1':•'i' J'jl,: .:f,1,7'If:lid,...:1 PARCEL "D"` `'' Beginning at the' NE corner of the MAIN TRACT as described below . _ Thence southerly :along the easterly line.. thereof a distance::: of 300 feet to the true, point of beginning ; thence wester. l`y' parallel . with. the North;.l i ne of the main tract her'ei n des- cribed a ;^dista.nce of 300 feet to an intersection. with. a Vine, i s parallel ,w:ith and 300 feet. westerly °o.f,; as meas.ur.ed .at. right, angles ..;to , the East l,ine'.of tra:c't;:` th'enc;e southerly along said parallel. intersectio.n with the northeasterly line of the Greenbelt:. .` ,...: area ;'as shown:. ,on the Comprehensive Plan :revision dated . ` said Greenbelt area also :.known., as Parcel "E",;- .thence southeasterly along; the.' north'erly Greenbe.l.t: area: to an intersection with.. the . East ' l ine'•'o.f said: mai''n...tr.act, thence.:''northerly, along the East _l:in:e : ; :'_. the:reof. a distance of 8'00 ' fe.et more o'r less to the point ':;` ' ;' of beginning iMAIN TRACT All that po.rtion . of, the Northeast one- a.qurte.r' an.d.:.of� Government :L.ots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Townshi 2.3 = North , Range' 5' East;.:'W.�M described. ,-Beginn-ing at the; Southwest corner of the Southeast "one • quarter.: of- the Northeast one-quarter of said. thence -north along the. West .l the of said distance of 252 23, feet to the true point .of beg'inn`i;ng• ' . ^°' `'`' said point . also 'designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 '.17" east .a, di stance of 526. 41 feet; thence south 88°52 ' 04"' east, a distance of. 799 feet to the East line~ of, 'Sect'ion 1-7 , thence south along said East l,` ine to .the East one=.quarter _corner' 'of Section '17 ; . t,h:ence South. along . the East: l in'e of said section to . an rntersec }'r����,ry tion with the, Northerly ' right-of-way li'ne ;of State.. Ro'ad' No ::. S (St. ' S . R: .#169 ) , '('Maple Valley -Hi:ghway )., `.thenc.e.:.,;in a :general Northwesterly, direction along sai-d, 'N.orther.ly right-of-wayHl.ine to an i.ntersect.ion with ..a line that.. ', lies North 89°45 '. 1 T" west a distance of 653 . 91. feet from - P:oi.nt "A" thence ,..•South;':890.45 ' 17" east a distance "'of ' 653 . 91 feet, to .Point '"A"'. and the true point of beg innin PARCEL E" All that- ,.portion of the .following described ma,i n ";tract designated as a G.reenb.el t ' a'r.ea as shown on the , Comprehens:.i-v,e Plan revision dated Play 17 ,1 1972 .' MAIN TRACT . All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter. . and. o'f . °` Government Lots 7 'and & within Section .l7 ; Townsh'i p: •'23" North , Range 5 East ,-W.M . described• as, f,ol l o.ws Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast'-.o:ne= quarter of the Northeast one-quarter, of. said Section thence north along the ;West line of said subdiviision distance of 252 . 2.3 feet to the true point of beginning ', - said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence -:s.o'uth `89°45 ' 1 7" east. a distance of 526 . 41 feet ;. thence 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet-to the East 'Line' _; of' ,Sect:io,n 1.7 ;, .thence south along said, :East. line` t'.0 : ;�.�� ;;: East 'one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing 4:;^ 1;" south -a-long the East line of said section to an in^ter ' `` ti,on with the Northerly right-of-way l i`ne. .of . No 5 . (St : S• R . #16.9 ) (Maple Valley Highwa'y) , ,thenc'e':.' ;n ,±,;';:: . ;; .,;va :'.•.: '< 4-3 a general. Northwesterly direction along said Northerly:, right-of-way' line to an intersection with a Tine..ghat lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 ", east a distance of • ws 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . • • • • • ' - • 'j`' ,°�:,I;'„,rill"' EXII.I.B:1T, lt: • _ ,_i; 1{.''— •: w:-:L__Jl//ro��/�•+' 4` , 1 'Il• wont it / II'• f � ON . , r •°' ' ,• L6E,Ac, /' i l,ti ,104:,., 1�1 �,' - :-TrEA r.,. \ rr.//5 / J [,,,, ,r K .0 IP ,jI ; �p \Yy -*...,.,.68v '�/ 7'137.nj hti ULI'JI'I LF ldl IEf71' f .. • : .I S "' c .• �. 12J ,. 0354t. r, ,EFn I; 1."1‘9] 111i`' � C i 1 lT .J :0 f, ., 1: 'I {I�Ir F," ;l 14 14 .,RI: r _ 3S vi.1.,(l'' . • fl _ 'ill-I -- r: j 0 4 I J J 'JAL i ,. l: 'y u?�i 4 3 _ .I .r 13 20 I Li -,-- ti - -'- 1 'S,' � 'i. r • .i I SIT O rG6ta�'S ! 1 t 12. 3L: 10 II l .Ic.'�I I -''.� .'' ',.-9,,^1 ;J l:i "7. 1FL: I-1's E �. 7. ` W MT..nLIVET_ CEM'tERY_aG6, i • Gr1j, ��l �; ; l Lr'1 0`',?56 ...A...! ,// �`�;rn�' (// 1.11 OLIV!T n fl "s,� J-!,L• "^JI �' :/ //,�' .". CP1.111EN1 __-.._ • rr�e JTe,a9- r. '' ` V 'I'. 6 Ct: ':'l-. l'.�LJ;.� L—�:{ , 395 Ac, {C '195 I „ -- .1,,,I, ,, •. , : .. •r .. .. -, ....,. .„:„!...-„,,;, + " f ` t l' M - ■■77{ R.t.Y' 1, '' Y ` 3 ''C is7 . .-.,.,,,;":.,,.. ..,.;,........,,, `< • 1 R ' — °vIl Acres -_. _,1 i ��<, it o, It��$'a �, , , ; I. • _�• >\ ,\\ ti '` b, ,,:1g:t':':y r,nt�n 6 •Gr•:n>,+f: co !S� • vim'.« ,. eriVta- • l J','-, Y'' 1 \ Ydil" \ - . — • ,; 1..',: \ � Fall N. • �: CI ^1��Ec .� \ ,�; � , tlar:E ': .YE{'� '\ � _k4 ,rf,,, \ Fr: ;: : ,'V,I, ram;;, • DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS . , • • WHEREAS, Kent Highlands , Inc . , successor by merger to Stone way Concrete ,. Inc . , a firm incorporated in the State of Washington , is the owner of real property in the City of Renton , County of King ,; . , State of Washington , described as follows : All ,that portion of the Northeast 'one.-quarter and of Govern''.- ..,. „ :.•,,':;' ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M . described as follows : Begi nni na at the southwest corner of the southeast one- �' ":a°,�:,�",'°;`' ,�'•.� Q quarter of the northeast one-quarter of said Section. 17 ; C thence north along the west line o•f said. subdivision. a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ;" • tR said point also designated as Point "A" ; . thence south .,, 89945 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south' 88°52.1, 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the east line • of Section .17 ; thence south along said east ' line to the. east one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the east. line of said section to an intersec- tion with the northerly right-of-way line of .State Road' No . 5 (St. S . R . #16.9 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; , thence in .:, a general northwesterly direction along said northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that . lies north 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from, , Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of - r 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning ,; WHEREAS, the owner of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . • NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant , and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land • as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to th,e use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as, .. • ' follows : "r ii gig.• • DEVELOPMENT • . Any and all development of the subject property shall be subject to City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordi , . . nance , Chapter 27 , Title IV , ( Building Regulations ) of Ordinance 1628 known as " Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton . " A master development plan for the entire • property as described above shall be submitted to and 6 approved by the City of Renton pursuant to the abovemen- • m tioned ordinance prior to preparation of specific develop-' • . ment olans . BUILDING HEIGHT No building or structure shall exceed a height of thirty- five ( 35 ) feet when located within the westerly • 1100 feet • of above described property as measured from the northwest • , • —, • • ‘;.• • • . _ . corner along the north property line ( including Parcels A . and B , as noted on attached Exhibit A ) . • . - OPEN SPACE "- • • • The hillside slope area along the south property line . . northeast of Maple Valley Highway ( SR- 169 ) , indicated as H • • . , . . • . greenbelt on , the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use . • . Plan as revised May 17 , 1972 , shall be retained in its . • natural state. No buildings , structures , roads , drive- , ways,: or parking shall be constructed in said greenbelt:, . • area ( Parcel E , Exhibit A) . . r\J , - co • ACCESS • . • • CD • A primary access Street shall be provided , to the site from N . E . Third Street, subject to City of Renton approval of its design and location as part of the total develop- ment plan . Access to existing Blaine Avenue N . E . shall be for emergency purposes only . A suitable. barrier and gate • shall be constructed at the existing south terminus of Blaine Avenue N . E .' subject to Renton Traffic Division and • ' • Fire Department approval . Installation of appropriate . ; . . traffic control devices ( including channelization , light- ing , signing and traffic signals ) at N . E . Third Street will be provided by the property owner and/or developer - • : when required by the City of Renton DURATION • • - - These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 ,• 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that if a master plan for total ' develop- ment of the . property is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance : • within two ( 2 ) years and substantial construction begun within three (3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecu-. ' ' ted. toward completion thereafter, the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert: back -td • the zoning. which existed prior to the filing of this docu- ment , and these restrictive covenants shall become null • and void . The term "substantial construction"• shall mean the physical alteration of the land for. constructionpursU-H.H ':. ant to City approved development plans as per the above- mentioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance and a valid • ' building permit , or construction of required utilities for such development . The abovementioned time periods , May-be . , • extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and • • • • • - 2 - • Il I Ill • - • • • • approval by the Renton Planning Department . Such reason able cause shall include , , but may not be limited to , the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State. Environmental Policy Act of 1971 . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King ;', County by either the City of Renton or any property owners ad:join- ing subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . s,. Qa �``• IN WITNESS WHEREOF ;the parties hereby affix their hands this' . 0 19�!J T-.. _ day of �'1�c 1_.—. - — —__ , KENT HIGHLANDS , INC . / � �(/^ [gyp By /�/ ! President �' i 1 /i , : ,'' / Secret't'ary STATE O.F WAS H I NGTON } COUNTY OF KING } On thi s !47 day of /9r (/ - 19 '777 before me personally appeared, to be ;the -� !�' - �'�=< si ,.r� � and �;'� rk" - r�.�°y,r respectively , of KENT HIGHLANDS , INC . the corporation: that execu,t•e¢''f -. the within and foregoing 'instrument , ~ and .acknowledged said inst:r.umen,a,'.r'''' '';i,,"'' ' ' to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for •the , use`s' an'd:'! . ,:,. purposes there-in mentioned , and on oath stated that they ized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed. is'. the corporate seal of said corporation . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have d� hereunto set my hand" and affixed m h, 1; ' official seal' the day and year ' first above written . `,\/t j ' (/c.... __a..,...J• L /•6r::. 'GL.l r,. ',li• '�r' ;.f '':',S,',il'." r N,ot ry Pu i c in nd for the State ' y o . ,�.. Washingt resi ing at YI' rr; r - ; 3 .. 5,4;, Pier^, Renton City Council 2/28/77 Page 7 Old Business by Council - Continued • Park & Ride recommended that immediate steps be taken in talks and negotiations Continued with Boeing for an "interim" facility in the north-end of Renton. The letter noted discussions held on proximity of the northeast Boeing parking lot with FAI-405 and the committee suggested that a portion of the lot might be made available while studies proceed on permanent location; further noting this would not effect the 2nd and Burnett location and have no effect on single family residential areas, yet be close to the Highlands area. MOVED BY SHINPOCH, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Park & Ride The Public Services Committee report also recommended that criteria Continued for' park and ride lots be established immediately. The report explained discussions of effects on single family homeowners and recommended the site criteria prior to permanent facility selection, and would deal with economic feasibility, effects on community, protection of abutting residential areas, setbacks and access, environmental considerations, rider convenience and service and costs of construction and maintenance. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. Upon inquiry, Councilwoman Seymour-Thorpe noted criteria would be set by the Highway Department and the committee; Stredicke noted committee to continue with park and ride problem. MOTION CARRIED. Park & Ride The Public Services Committee report also recommended that the City, Continued State and Metro proceed on a study for permanent park and ride sites in the two geographical areas of Renton, with two. lots,rather than one. The report noted that upon criteria establishment, study should begin on two sites; that to maintain State funding, locations must be close to freeway access and proposed Metro bus route. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. Public Serivices The Public Services Committee, Aviation Division, submitted report • Aviation Report noted 2/10 bid opening for seaplane base development wherein four bids Seaplane Base received ranging from $86,200 to $76,280, excluding tax. The report Bid Awarded recommended acceptance of the low bid submitted by Tripp Construction, 234 SW 16th St. , in the amount of $76,280 plus tax. The report recommended that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to execute the Acceptance of Grant Offer which was initially in amount of $50,000 and has been increased to $60,000 by FAA. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUN- CIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATIONS OF COMMITTEE AWARDING BID AND AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT. CARRIED. NEW BUSINESS BY COUNCIL ASPO Conference Upon request by Councilman Perry to attend ASPO Conference in San Diego in April , it was moved by Grant, and seconded by Thorpe to concur in request. SUBSTITUTE MOTION BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, TO REFER THE CONFERENCE REQUEST TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF 3/8/77. ROLL CALL: 4-AYE: PERRY, BRUCE, SHINPOCH, THORPE; 2-NO: GRANT AND STREDICKE. SUBSTITUTE MOTION CARRIED. Ways & Means Councilwoman Shinpoch submitted Ways& Means Committee report recom- Committee Report mending appointment of Beth Borst to the Human Rights Affairs Commission. Appointment MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means The Ways & Means Committee report recommended second and final readings Committee Report of an ordinance amending the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan involv- Ordinance #3112 ing property in the general vicinity of 138th St. and Sunset Blvd. N.E. 138th & Sunset NE generally known as the Loveless/Powell property. Following readings (Loveless/Powell ) it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY GRANT, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS Comprehensive Plan READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. :/—Ordinance #3113 ! The. Ways & Means Committee report recommended second and final readings Stoneway Rezone 1\ of an ordinance changing the zoning from Residence District (R-1 ) to R-1 , R-2, R-3 and R-4, generally known as the Stoneway Rezone. Follow- ing readings of the ordinance rezoning property located east of SR-169 Renton City Council 2/28/77 Page 8 Ordinances & Resolutions - Continued Stoneway .Rezone (Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Continued Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right of Way, it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ~ALL ,AYES.. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDIKCKE, SECONDED BY GRANT, THAT THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AS FILED BE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. CARRIED. Ordinance MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, ITEMS 2 and 4 OF COMMITTEE First Reading REPORT BE PLACED ON FIRST READING (Other items being in committee) . Spendiff Rezone AS RECOMMENDED. CARRIED. City Clerk Mead read ordinance changing the zoning from S-1 to SR-1 generally known as the George Spendiff property located 807 Union Ave. NE. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUN- CIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Ordinance City Clerk Mead read ordinance rezoning certain property from G to First Reading B-1 known as the Norwood Rezone and located at the northeast corner Norwood Rezone of N. 30th and Park N. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Resolution #2092 The Ways & Means Committee report recommended reading and adoption Seaplane Ramp of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute docu- FAA Grant ments accepting a grant offer from FAA which provided for a maximum Acceptance grant of $60,000 involving the Will Rogers-Wiley Post Memorial Sea- plane Base Improvements. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH,, RESOLU- TIONS BE READ. CARRIED. Following reading,MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS READ. CARRIED. Resolution #2093 The committee report recommended reading and adoption of a resolution West Hill Joint requested by the Public Works Department providing for the participa- Water Supply tion in a Comprehensive Water System Plan with various water districts and the city, providing for pro rata participation in the plan. The initial budgetary contribution is $7,498. MOVED BY GRANT, SECOND BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION.A5 READ. CARRIED. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, LAST ITEM OF THE RESOLUTION, FINANCING, BE REFERRED TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Resolution #2094 The committee report recommended reading and adoption of a resolution Opposing opposing Senate Bill #2430 pending before the Washington State Senate Senate Bill #2430 45th Regular Session providing for the transfer of authority and re Transfer of • operation from a Metropolitan Municipal Corporation to the County Metro Authority Executive authority and eliminating direct representation of the people without a direct vote of the people. Following reading, it was MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED, The meeting of the Renton City Council adjourned at 11 :29 p.m.czieze-eg& - Delores A. Mead Ci Clerk . U amiR OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY • RENTON,WASHINGTON 0 POST OFFICE BOX 826, 100 2nd AVENUE BUILDING • RENTON,WASHINGTON 98055 255-8678 (40.. 0Q ��� GERARD M.SHELLAN,CITY ATTORNEY LAWRENCE J.WARREN, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY 4 O SEPS�� February 10, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO : Del Mead, City Clerk FROM: Gerard M. •Shellan, City Attorney Re : Stoneway Concrete, Inc. Rezone Dear Del: Enclosed herewith is the original of a proposed Rezone Ordinance as above 1baptioned. Please be sure that the Planning Department in Exhibit "A" spells out the correct legal description of all four parcels rezoned to R-1, VVV R-2, R-3 and R-4 respectively. We also note that the Restrictive Covenant form does not have any date of execution. This should be changed on the last page showing when the document has been executed. A clause indicating this would be appropriate above the signature as follows : "In witness whereof the parties hereby affix their hands this day of • ," Gerard M. S4 lan GMS :nd I ,. Encl . Del: Please fill in the record n data for the ,Restrictive Covenants on page 2 . City of Renton 2/14/77 Page 6 Ordinances & Resolutions - Continued Ordinance #3109 Springbrook Watershed Annexation. Following readings, it was MOVED BY . Springbrook . PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDI.CKE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: Watershed. 5-AYES: PERRY, CLYMER, BRUCE, SHINPOCH AND STREDICKE; ONE-NO: THORPE. Annexation MOTION CARRIED. Ordinance #3110 The Ways & Means Committee report recommended second and final readings Senior Citizen of an ordinance establishing certain special rates for qualified senior Pet Licenses citizens relating to pet licenses, wherein qualified senior citizens may purchase special permanent animal licenses at regular cost and shall not be required to annually purchase a new license for the lifetime of such licenses animals(up to three cats or dogs) . Following readings, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. • Ordinance 3111 The Ways & Means Committee report recommended second and final readings Austin Rezone of an ordinance rezoning certain property from General Classification District to Light Industry District, known as the Austin Rezone. Follow- ing reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, AMEND THE MOTION TO INSTRUCT CITY CLERK TO WITHHOLD PUBLICATION UNTIL RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS HAVE BEEN FILED. AMENDMENT CARRIED, MOTION AS AMENDED, CARRIED. '9g. First Reading The Ways & Means Committee report recommended first reading and referral Stoneway Rezone back to committee of an ordinance rezoning certain property from Resi- dence District and Suburban Resident District to Residence District (R-1 , R-2, R-3 and R-4) for, the Stoneway property. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE. WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE. Councilman Stredicke inquired regarding the restrictive covenants and was advised by City Clerk Mead that covenants have been executed. MOTION CARRIED. First Reading The Ways & Means Committee report recommended first reading and referral Comprehensive back to committee of an ordinance amending the city's Comprehensive Plan Vicinity Land Use Plan relating to certain property in the vicinity of 138th 138th & Sunset NE and Sunset Blvd. N.E. (Loveless-Powell property) . MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Resolution #2090 The Ways & Means Committee report recommended reading and adoption of Travel Funds a resolution transferring $6,585.00 from the Contingency Fund to the current fund for Operating Budget Travel Accounts as shown in th.e reso- lution. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL AMENDS BY PRIOR ACTION OF COUNCIL TO ADD $100 TO PLANNING ADMINISTRATION FROM CONTINGENCY FUND, AMENDING TOTAL. TO $6,685. CARRIED. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ AND AMENDED. ' CARRIED, Resolution #2091 The Ways & Means Committee report recommended reading and adoption of a Rescinding resolution rescinding prior Resolution #1987 which declared surplus Resolution #1987 certain property owned by the city at 1511 Lake Ave. S. which property Surplus Property was donated to the city for park purposes by Max Farr, Property Agent Lake Ave. South for Olympic Pipeline Co. Council had determined that it is in the best interest of the city if such property remains as "open space. " Follow- ing reading, Councilman Stredicke reported request of Councilman Grant that resolution be held one. weeR.. .Clymer noted no contact had been made with the committee. .MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS 'READ. CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL MEETING ADJOURN. CARRIED. The meeting adjourned at 11 :14 p.m. A!„1.04,1,4L, Delores. A. Mead, City C1?erk Renton City Council 2/14/77 Page 5 Old Business - Continued Public Services Committee took no action because of earlier review by Public Works Committee Report Committee and rate adjustment by administration. (5) PWT. referral of Referrals 10/25/76 re regrading of Aberdeen and NE 24th - Committee took no action Continued concurring in recommendation of Public Works Committee and the administra- tion to deny request. (6) TC referral of 10/6/75 re guardrail on Lake Ave. S. - Committee recommends no action be taken. (7) TC referral of 11/3/75 re overtime parking fines - Committee recommends no action be taken. (8) PWT referral of 6/7/76 re portable covered unit - Committee recommends no action. (9) PWT referral re Sound Ford letter - No action required. (10) PWT referral of 8/23/76 re question of withholding a percentage of contractors' fees - Committee recommends referral to admini- stration for recommendation. Aviation The Public Services Committee recommended it serve as the Aviation Com- Committee mittee and continue to hold.monthly public meetings with tenants and Meetings interested parties as it has for the past three years, and that these meetings be restricted to airport business. MOVED. BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Seaplane Base Bid Councilman Stredicke called attention to bid opening for seaplane base improvements, noting additional funds have been requested from the 'North- west region of the F.A.A. Committee will be meeting and report to Coun- RR R/W cil on 28th. Councilman Stredicke also discussed railroad right-of-way. along Cedar River which the city plans to acquire and which has been designated by Transamerica Title Co. as reverting to the. flenry Yesler Estate i.f not used for railroad property. Stredicke was (advised by the Public Works Director that only a portion of the right-of-way is so desig- nated and that the matter is under further study. School Levy Councilwoman Shinpoch thanked Council for full support gi'ven at the Committee of the Whole meeting for Renton School levy. CETA Employees Administrative Assistant Custer reported the city has been authorized to employee three CETA employees, one being Don Camp,.who will be doing research and located in Councilman Bruce' s office. Metro Take Over Councilwoman Seymour-Thorpe called attention to proposed transfer of Senate Bill #2430 authority from Metro Council to King County Council , noting loss of rep- resentation to cities. Mayor Delaurenti noted Suburban Mayor's Assoc. had voted against this senate bill which would allow absorbing of Metro by majority vote of King County Council , noting need for vote of people. MOVED BY THORPE, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO DRAFT A RESOLUTION TO FORWARD TO. THE STATE LEGISLATURE OPPOS- ING SENATE BILL NO. 2430 AND ESPECIALLY THAT PART RELATING TO NO DIRECT VOTE BY THE PEOPLE. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, REFER THE MATTER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND MAYOR'S OFFICE WITH COPIES TO BE SENT TO LEGISLA- TURE AND COUNTY COUNCIL. CARRIED. L.E.O. F.,F. Councilwoman Shinpoch reported Association of Washington Cities plans toy Revision revise L. E.O.F.F. laws. Councilman Clymer explained AWC ,Board was appointed for solutions, noting regional meetings to be conducted by Auburn Mayor Kersey. Meeting Extended The time having reached 11 :00 p.m. , it was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY SHINPOCH, COUNCIL CONTINUE MEETING PAST SCHEDULED TIME UNTIL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ARE READ. CARRIED. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means Ways and Means Committee report was submitted by Chairman Clymer recom- Committee Report mending second and final reading for an ordinance annexing certain ter- ritory to the city generally known as the Olympic View property which is Ordinance #3108 located between SE 165th & S. 24th St. (SE 164th). Following reading, it Olympic View was MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE COUNCIL ADOPT ORDINANCE AS READ. Annexation ROLL CALL: ALL AYES. CARRIED. . Ordinance #3109 The Ways and Means Committee report recommended second and final reading ' Springbrook of an ordinance annexing certain territory to the city known as the Watershed Annex. Renton City Council 2/7/77 Page 3 Consent Agenda - Continued Consent Agenda MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA Approved AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. CORRESPONDENCE AND CURRENT BUSINESS toneway Concrete Letter from Planning Director Ericksen presented Planning Commission Rezone of area recommendation for approval of Stoneway Concrete Co. request for rezone South of of 43 acres (24 acres of buildable area) from R-1 and. S-1 to R-1 , R-2, Monterey Terrace R-3 and R-4. Property located east of Maple Valley Hwy, south of Monterey East of Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of the Bonneville Power line SR-169 right-of-way. The letter explained the existing use as a former gravel excavation site and the proposed use as multi-family residential , with proposed access to be located on the east side of Mt. Olivet Cemetery. The letter explained approval of the rezone is contingent upon restric- tive covenants relating to' the development of the property, building height limitation in the R-2 parcel , hillside-open space preservation, access and traffic control , which covenants are agreed upon and executed.. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS AND MEANS COM- MITTEE FOR LEGISLATION. Discussion of protection to Monterey Terrace residents ensued wherein Planning Director Ericksen noted the area community club had concurred in the covenants, that compliance with Planned Unit Development ordinance is required, that public hearings will be held on plans when submitted. Councilwoman Thorpe asked that covenants include restrictions that proposed buildings are not placed at higher elevation that present homes. MOTION CARRIED APPROVING REZONE. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL ACCEPT .COVENANTS AS FILED. CARRIED. Olympic View Letter from City Clerk Mead reported the King County Boundary Review Terrace Board has reported favorably on the annexation of 2.2 acres to the Annexation city located between S.E. 164th St. (S. 27th St. ) and S.E. 165th St. south of the city limits and east of Benson Rd. S. , known as the Olympic View Terrace Annexation. The letter noted no protests were received and that the Boundary Review Board did not choose to invoke jurisdic- tion. It was further recommended that the Council proceed with the annexation and refer the matter to the Ways. & Means Committee for the, annexation ordinance. MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CON- CUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION AND REFER THE MATTER TO THE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. Springbrook Letter from City Clerk Mead reported the King County Boundary Review Watershed Board has reported favorably on the annexation to the City of. Renton of Annexation . 37.3 acres located adjacent to Springbrook Road east of 96th Ave. S. , west of 104th Ave. S.E. and not contiguous to the city, however, city owned. The Boundary Review Board has received no request for review and has not chosen to invoke jurisdiction. The letter recommended that Council proceed with the annexation and refer the matter to the Ways & Means Committee for the annexation ordinance. MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN THE RECOMMENDATION. CARRIED. L.I .D. #288 Letter from Deputy Finance Director Bennett recommended borrowing of Whitman Court $50,493.36 from Street Forward Thrust Fund to Road & Street Construction Street Improvement account for L. I.D. #288 at an interest rate of 5.25% .per annum to be Fund Borrowing -repaid by 2/78. The letter' explained the total cost of LID 288 was $158,340.69 of which $99,877 was assessed against the property and the remaining $58,463.69 was to be paid by the city; $7,970.23 transferred from Cumulative Reserve to the LID Fund by Resolution 2082. MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND REFER THE MATTER" TO THE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE TO READ THE RESOLUTION AT THIS TIME. CARRIED. Resolution #2088 LID 288 Ways & Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented resolution recommending Fund Transfer reading and adoption of resolution transferring funds in amount of $50,493.46 from Street Forward Thrust Funds for LID No. 288, Whitman Court street and lighting improvements. Following reading, it was MOVED BY GRANT, SECONDED BY CLYMER, COUNCIL CONCUR IN RECOMMENDATION AND ADOPT RESOLUTION AS READ. CARRIED. Renton City Council 2/7/77 Page 4 Council MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL SUSPEND RULES AND CONTINUE Procedures . MEETING BEYOND 11 :00 P.M. ENDING TIME UNTIL ALL BUSINESS IS COMPLETED. ROLL WAS CALLED: 5-AYE- PERRY., CLYMER, BRUCE, SHINPOCH, THORPE. 2-NO- GRANT AND STREDICKE. MOTION CARRIED. . Executive MOVED BY PERRY, SECONDED BY STREDICKE COUNCIL MOVE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION Session TO DISCUSS ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY. CARRIED. Council went into execu- tive session at 10:00 p.m. and returned to the Chambers at 11 :20 p.m. ' Roll Call : All Council Members present except Councilman. Grant who left the meeting. OLD BUSINESS BY THE COUNCIL Ways & Means Ways & Means Committee Chairman Clymer presented committee report concur- Committee Report ring in the Mayor's appointment of Bruce Hulse to the Municipal Arts Appointment Commission replacing Mrs. Jean Musselwhite who has resigned. Appoint- ment is effective through 12/31/78. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. MOTION CARRIED. Public Services Public Services Committee Chairman Bruce submitted committee report Committee Report recommending the Administration be authorized to call for bids on two _ 1 ,500 GMP triple combination pumping engines for the. Fire Department. Fire Equipment Specifications are to include the city's affirmative action program; Bid Call and, monetary considerations to the city for any delay in delivery date; provision for trade-in of city's equipment and providing for alternate of ladder trucks with pumps. Councilman Bruce noted bid call includes two pump trucks, one 100 ft. ladder truck and . alternate with pumps. It was MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY THORPE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COM- MITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. Solid Waste The Public Services Committee report recommended the Administration Collection proceed with the call for bids on the garbage contract as proposed, Bid Call with the addition of a one-can minimum. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY BRUCE, COUNCIL CONCUR IN COMMITTEE REPORT. CARRIED. • ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways & Means The Ways & Means Committee Chairman Clymer submitted committee report Committee Report recommending second and final reading of an ordinance authorizing the Ordinance #3107 construction of LID #301 Sanitary sewers in and. near Dayton Ave. NE LID 301 Sewers between NE 20th and NE 22ndStreets. Following second and final readings , it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL ADOPT THE ORDINANCE AS READ. ROLL CALL: ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS VOTED "AYE" (Councilman Grant left meeting earlier). MOTION CARRIED. First Reading The Ways & Means Committee report recommended first reading of an ordi- Olympic View nance annexing certain territory to the City of Renton, known as the Annexation Olympic View Terrace. Following first reading, it "was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY PERRY, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE. Councilman Stredicke inquired re LID, being advised by Public Works Director Gonnason that LID #300 is sewer project for Olympic View. MOTION CARRIED. First Reading The Ways & Means Committee report recommended first reading of an ordi- Springbrook nance annexing certain territory to the City, known as the Springbrook Watershed Watershed. Following reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY BRUCE, Annexation. COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways & Means Committee report recommended first reading of an ordi- Austin Rezone nance rezoning certain property in the vicinity of SW 16th• St. between Powell Ave. SW and Thomas Ave. SW, from GS-1 to L-1 , known as the Austin Rezone. Following first reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. First Reading The Ways & Means Committee report recommended first reading of an ordi- Senior Citizen nance granting certain exemptions to qualified Senior Citizens regarding Pet 'Licenses pet licenses. Following first reading, it was MOVED BY CLYMER, SECONDED ' BY STREDICKE, COUNCIL REFER THE ORDINANCE BACK TO THE WAYS & MEANS COMMITTEE. CARRIED. . CF R• A • o THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 Z r: o O� CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ► MAYOR ® PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0 �Q� 235-2550 TFO SEP1 • February 4 , 1977 The Honorable C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor Members of the City Council Renton , Washington • RE : PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . Aopl . No . R-891-76 ; rezone from R- 1 and S- 1 to. R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple Valley Highway ) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-way : • Dear Mayor and Council Members : • The Planning Commission completed its review of the subject . application . Two public hearings and special committee meetings with the applicant and interested residents were conducted . The property has the following characteristics : Total Area -- ±43 acres with ±24 acres of buildable area Access - Existing - - Blaine Avenue N . E . Proposed - - . Proposed access to be located on east side of Mt . Olivet Cemetery . Existing Zoning -- R- 1 , S- 1 and GS- 1 Existing Use -- A former gravel excavation site . . Proposed Use -•- Multi -family residential . Comprehensive Land Use Plan -- Low density , medium density and high density multi -family ; greenbelt along steep hillside above Maple Valley Highway . The Planning Commission recommended that the Stoneway Concrete Company application for rezone from R- 1 and S- 1 to R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 be approved with restrictive covenants relating to development of the property , building height limitation • The Honorable C . J . Delaurenti , Mayor Members of the City Council Renton , Washington February 4 , 1977 Page Two in the R-2 parcel , hillside-open space preservation , and access and traffic control . The applicant has concurred in the restric- tive covenants (note signed copy and Exhibit A attached ) . The recommended zoning is in agreement with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan . (, ) uly y r yours , don ricksen • anni g irector GYE : wr Attachments cc : City Attorney City Clerk - • • � � \ y ` / 9RV CO '� • 1 ` I5 , II I 4 t ;•-t rDy ; j ,y 11 ‘ _yy 7 ao !! (/ #fix ij 7, ., ,r,�ti. G R Er' 6 E , Pol 4 i - 1 ; ,' '' 4/ 7 / ,, • / ,..,..,...„ V i /e 1,. \I ! .,73- - '' \ ill: 4": 1/-.---. ._. -----G- ---- .. "t f v 4 t. \ \ /\ / r!/''„. f a. ''� fir. ao; \ 1 /�/ "Ii W { ?fI '- ..l* ; - i 1� STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . �' ' 3 IA e � , rouvEr ; REZONE / {Nr �a M ,1 q ■'I �� 1' g CEMETERY 1 ." p!. 1 ar, RED NTON CITY LIMITS -"--- . j 1 1 /Q i • 1, 1 , 1 �:; 1 irk ''; II 1 I t '�' — --.. %\\%. 1 Ait4 �S \ ..,-r ev'.., s .+' ,c-•" I 11 I .� ''':'. 4,\ ��llh •` '.A:' 't 1%; I h SR.',' , 1 1' i i. /%" , i. _ .1 y\ h �.. ! ` Till -11 ..�µ�.illIllrll, .42 M REZONE : STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . ; Appl . No . R-891-76 ; rezone from R- 1 and S- 1 to } R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 ; property located east of SR- 169 Maple Valley 3 Highway ) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-way. ±43 . 1 acres with APPLICANT STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . TOTAL AREA 24.0 buildable area s PRINCIPAL ACCESS East side of Mt. Olivet Cemetary . { EXISTING ZONING R- 1 , S- 1 and GS- 1 [ EXISTING USE Abandoned gravel pit. Rezone to Higher Density from R-1 through R-4 for • PROPOSED USE future residential development. Single family, low density, medium density COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN and high density multi-family; greenbelt along steep hillside above Maple Valley Highway. , COMMENTS ' i DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Kent Highlands , Inc . , successor by merger to Stoneway Concrete , Inc . , a firm incorporated in the State of Wash- ington , is the owner of real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Govern- ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , • Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of the southeast one- quarter of the northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the west line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89 °45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88 °52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the east line of Section 17 ; thence south along said east line to the east one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the east line of said section to an intersec • - tion with the northerly right-of-way line of State Road N,o . 5 ( St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general northwesterly direction along said northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies north 89 °45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence south 89 °45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . WHEREAS, the owner of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant , and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : DEVELOPMENT Any and all development of the subject property shall be subject to City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordi - nance , Chapter 27 , Title IV , ( Building Regulations ) of Ordinance 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton . " A master development plan for the entire property as described above shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Renton pursuant to the abovementioned ordi - nance prior to preparation of specific development plans . • BUILDING HEIGHT No building or structure shall exceed a height of thirty-five • ( 35 ) feet when located within the westerly 1100 feet of above described property as measured from the northwest corner along the north property line ( including Parcel A and B , as noted on attached Exhibit A ) . OPEN SPACE The hillside slope area along the south property line northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) , indicated' as greenbelt on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan as revised May 17, 1972 , shall he retained in its natural state. No buildings , structures , roads , driveways , or parking shall be constructed in said greenbelt area {Parcel E, Exhibit A) . ACCESS A primary access street shall be provided to the site from N.E. Third Street, subject to City of Renton approval of its design and location as part of the total development Flan. Access to existing Blaine Avenue N.E. shall be for emergency purposes only. A suitable barrier and gate shall be constructed at the existing south terminus 'of Blaine Avenue N.E. subject to Renton Traffic Division and Fire Department approval. Installation of appropriate traffic control devices (including channelization, lighting, signing and traffic signals) at N.E. Third Street will be provided by the property owner and/or developer when required by the City of Renton. • DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31, 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that if a master plan for total development of the property is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned United Development Ordinance • • yr,. • within two (2) years and substantial construction begun within three (3) years of the filing of these covenants, and said construction and development dili- • gently prosecuted toward completion thereafter, the zoning of said property shall without further city action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document, and these restrictive • covenants shall become null and void. The term "substantial construction" shall, mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to city approved development plans as per the above-mentioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance and a valid building permit, or construction of required utilities for such development. The above mentioned time periods may be extended for reasonable cause upon written request to and approval by the Renton Planning Department. Such reasonable cause shall include , but may not be • limited to, the requirement of an environmental impact statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King • • County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoin- ing subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . KENT HIGHLANDS , INC . • By i4/5ix,/,7/, -_ -_... ✓,r;• - President By ,,Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this ./tee day , 1.972 , before me personally appeared 02, � (/ and . t (`0vr-� .,. _ , to me known to be the ��CZ �j1 e`er`, - and -- -- — ' respectively , of KENT HIGHLANDS , INC . , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned , and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . 2 N tary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing • • • • • ' loll .11 ik t:i,!1 / 1`�. • • \ r \�/�_ ``I I.,0 ' % - /-%. - � ' .it r / ---'�� t'4'A Can et't 't / / ._\ .. i- •-,5 • .., f .�t' ,;•\�' �iw lam. i), ING Y/Hllf ' \ Iit l- 1` �— �� � r.6AAc, 17onc, \\ !� I-if f53�:� �T RC� ; T.1.115 ��1.i,.'.�. I. Ic 19,j'•1 \, % A]• A Ali.OL1VI i •CI-MC \ c1 i5� •.::.__tA 153' :� A� '� / A i �� ____':Q.3?. ...•I @44 Ai:. '' �.- 1-�1��Jqq •ISO 17 i �JL4�1'- W iY ISa' �,a `' a-� 0 3S Ac. 1 - 131„01.. '04 i, ga 14I. 'Ii 35 c.� i r, 1 I g•e g ':l:r ; -- t13 �A I • r 3� s il I L- TER 106I'{.5 I Q 'I` IZ .. 09 ' IO I O�I , 'IA f 'IT �gq� t ;�; 0.] . U IOI ri r 15 t 1:3 12I ,� �- Ia t —I e9 SAT. OLIVET_ CEMETERY:[pc ; 9 61 Lt I I 7 it ' -- 101-- I ---- -- --- - -- 1 >2 ''-,F•i of II I `I�I o so! . ,z" i Q 10 9, II��,/ :75 ii f;. yl, 81 r. , .i. i V i 7/ V, Q db ' I .I I I 6-it:+ O '`J...� .� MI OLIVET • II r' . „� Ob '` CEME1ERY __— II44./48.ILO 1_ I I 11 ` 6 • L9s I j . Z dy7•' •.,• I A. s.ra r 9I .—. • \5•„ r: •/ 1 ov .) P /i`frvrry j �i lam' r= - - .._-:. _' W _ �q {� +.•.�.... ^aa,.�;Jlf, ''!f _ ~ - I•t.'4f1 P- to J' I _ - • ° :. .. c / �'t /'k. Z-J i, r2 d. i r / I Cd7 •, V.. / ,- t I .yar... t✓ - 1•i _ • 7`�- `� 3 3 A.C. ri i ,x• osio rt• / v_ s/. .—. � ,t -� , mo ` `. ---- 1/ ' l? •j j i \.c2\y�•* �''� ,` \i. , ' , - ,..J Acre );/), ,�\" \i,\\: 4 G�q�.T ' '\ ill i 5`\, ` T � 1 l V A 26 \\ .•. ,.. _``r } 1' 3f SIO CWAV SANK S GRAVEI. CO .!A .Aar. }„ v 8� " (-3 E.. ,.. ti�• y a„ aMcox rr.mu �T� _.e,,,_ 4249 ram ' • ;� ` \ ,. ,�'' •\ 4 • • '`4 ate r \,. , I,\\-\\ `T\. \ w, 4iINI CRPACE CORP t•. _, e „I is ttt �F O� ?.rI •"Z�: Pti 4i1) ZI` `�k -5, .\.`.=- 11 Gcv+ Lot P, \ • ( i r 1))\� - C •' �Cy. '.i� •�\\ \ , \t C P SIHANE 6`t >. F_ �/ c. �S 1I 1 . �(,\.. iOoJ II , t \ .-. ,r:--i\ ..,C, ''tt \l/.r5, '\ o i�ias if‘').I' .� is / `=.','�.. ,� 13.03 A c 3 .4 1 t i C 1 e1rs•""'7 ,q \ N \, !\Wr! { 1_ ''YI.6:6 f'71..;',G rt Z/1 ::':'1'•1-71'�.% I. =\ `��\rt+�� \\\ .,`\• s..,- ' `'.' 1'"- t: ij:; ry-/..`` `r'_'-t:''.. .. / I r` sOJ SUBJECT TO REVISION DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Kent Highlands , Inc . , successor by merger to Stoneway Concrete , Inc . , a firm incorporated in the State of Wash • - ington , is the owner of real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Govern- ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of the southeast one- quarter of the northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the west line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89 °.45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88 °52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the east line of Section 17 ; thence south along said east line to the east one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the east line of said section to an intersec- tl on with the northerly right-of-way line of State Road . No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general northwesterly direction along said northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies north 89 °45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet 'from Point "A" ; thence south 89 °45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . WHEREAS, the owner of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant , and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : DEVELOPMENT Any and all development of the subject property shall be subject to City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordi - nance , Chapter 27 , Title IV , ( Building Regulations ) of Ordinance 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton . " A master development plan for the entire property as described above shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Renton pursuant to the abovementioned ordi - nance prior to preparation of specific development plans . BUILDING HEIGHT No building or structure shall exceed a height of thirty-five ( 35 ) feet when located within the westerly 1100 feet of above described property as measured from the northwest corner along the north property line ( including Parcel A and B , as noted on attached Exhibit A) . ec/e/ / &OyC /eV d l s,G il/ — /41/77 — .- '/ter OPEN SPACE The hillside slope area along the south property line northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR-169 ) , indicated as greenbelt on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan as revised May 17 , 1972 , shall be retained in its natural state . No buildings , structures , roads , driveways , or parking shall be constructed in said greenbelt area ( Parcel E , Exhibit A ) . ACCESS A primary access street shall be provided to the site from N . E . Third Street , subject to City of Renton approval of its design and location as part of the total develop- ment plan . Access to existing Blaine Avenue N . E . shall be for emergency purposes only . A suitable barrier and gate shall be constructed at the existing south terminus of . Blaine Avenue N . E . subject to Renton Traffic Division and Fire Department approval . Installation of appropriate traffic control devises ( including channelization , lighting , signing , and traffic signals ) at N . E . Third Street will be provided by the property owner and/or developer when required by the City of Renton . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that if a master plan for total develop- ment of the property is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance within two (2 ) years and substantial construction begun within three ( 3) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter , the zoning of said property shall without further city action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document . The term "substantial construction " shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to city approved development plans as per the abovementioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance , or construction of required utilities for such development. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoin- ing subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . KENT HIGHLANDS , INC . By President By Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day , 19 , before me personally appeared and , to me known to be the and respectively , of KENT HIGHLANDS , INC . , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned , and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing at DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Stoneway Concrete , Inc . , a firm incorporated in the State of Washington , is the owner of real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows ; All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Govern- ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W .M . described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of the southeast one- quarter of the northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the west line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°.45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the east line of Section 17 ; thence south along said east line to the east one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the east line of said section to an intersec- tion with the northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St . S . R . #169) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general northwesterly direction along said northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that • lies north 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 , 91 feet from Point "A" ' thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "q" and the true point of beginning. WHEREAS, the owner of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant , and impose restrictions and covenants running with. the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns., as follows : DEVELOPMENT Any and all development of the subject property shall be subject to City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordi - nance , Chapter 27 , Title IV , (Building Regulations ) of Ordinance 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton . " A master development plan for the entire • property as described above shall be' submitted to and approved by the City of Renton pursuant to the abovementioned ordi - nance prior to preparation of specific development plans . BUILDING HEIGHT No building or structure shall exceed a height of thirty-five ( 35) feet when located within the westerly 1100 feet of above described property as measured from the northwest corner- along the north property line . ( including Parcel A and B , as noted on attached Exhibit A) . . • /.' ✓/6110 � /- � �'- 77 a OPEN SPACE The hillside slope area along the south property line northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR-169 ) , indicated as greenbelt on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan as revised May 17 , 1972 , shall be retained in its natural state . No buildings , structures , roads , driveways , or parking shall be constructed in said greenbelt area ( Parcel E , Exhibit A) . ACCESS A primary access street shall be provided to the site from N . E . Third Street , subject to City of Renton approval of its design and location as part of the total develop- ment plan . Access to existing Blaine Avenue N . E . shall be for emergency purposes only . A suitable barrier and gate shall be constructed at the existing south terminus of Blaine Avenue N . E . subject to Renton Traffic Division and Fire Department approval . Installation of appropriate traffic control devises ( including channelization , lighting , signing , and traffic signals ) at N . E . Third Street will be provided by the property owner and/or developer when required by the City of Renton . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050. It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that if a master plan for total develop- ment of the property is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance within two ( 2 ) years and substantial construction begun within three ( 3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter , the zoning of said property shall without further city action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document . The term "substantial construction " shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to city approved development plans as per the abovementioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance , or construction of required utilities for such development. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton .or any property owners adjoin- ing subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . By President By Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) • COUNTY OF KING ) Oh this day of , 19 , before me personally appeared and , to me known to be the and respectively , of STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned , and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation . IN. WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . • Notary Public in and for the State of • Washington , residing at RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION • PUBLIC HEARING MEETING JANUARY 19, 1977 MINUTES COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: James Akers , Thomas Buckingham, Logan Garrison , Sandra Gist, James Kirkman , Anthone Mola , Clark Teegarden , Joan Walker, Bylund Wik . COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT: None . CITY OFFICIALS PRESENT: George Perry , Councilman ; Patricia Seymour- Thorpe, Councilwoman . PRESS : Don Smith , Record Chronicle . CITY STAFF PRESENT: Gordon Ericksen , Planning Director; Willis Roberts , Recording Secretary. 1 . CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 8 : 10 p .m. by Chairman Garri - son , who led the Pledge of Allegiance . 2- ROLL CALL was taken by Secretary. Gist . All members responded present. 3 - INTRODUCTION OF NEW PLANNING COMMISSIONERS : Noting the presence of new members on. the Planning Commission-- - James Akers , James Kirkman , and Thomas Buckingham--the Chairman s welcomed the Commissioners and introduced them to the audience . George Nelson , who was present in the audience , was also intro- , duced by Chairman Garrison . Mr. Nelson has been appointed to the Planning . Commission effective February 1 , 1977 . 4 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES : . The Chairman called for corrections or additions to the minutes of December 8 , 1977 . As there were none. offered , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY WALKER, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE MINUTES BE -, APPROVED AS WRITTEN. MOTION CARRIED. 5- OLD BUSINESS: REZONE: A,, STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . ; Appl . No . R-891-76 ; rezone from R-1 , S-1 , and GS-1 to R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 ; also hillside area to remain as greenbelt; property located east of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of the powerline right-of-way . Noting continuation from the November public hearing , the Chair- man requested an up-date from the staff. The Planning Director pointed out the area under review on the vicinity map and noted parcels requested for rezoning to permit higher density development. He cited significant development in the vicinity and described topographical conditions of the site. Mr. Ericksen advised that the matter had been referred to the Special Studies Committee for study and indicated that • their committee report was available this evening . r• Renton Planning. Commission Meeting January 19 , 1977 • Page Two Slides and aerial photographs were then viewed . Development in the area relative to the site was noted ; current Comprehensive Plan designations were indicated; and the matter of existing and potential access was discussed . Former and proposed use for. the site was reviewed . It was noted that at the time the Comprehensive Plan for the area was amended in 1972 , restric- tive covenants specifying single family development were attached to the 100 feet adjacent to the single family resi - dential district directly south of Monterey Terrace . The need for regrading and recontouring of the site prior to develop- ment was indicated . Noting no questions of the Planning Director by the Commission , the Chairman invited comment from the applicant . Robert DeBoer, Manager, Stoneway Concrete Company , referred the Commission to the Planning Director ' s review this evening and his own comments made at the November public hearing . He noted his attendance at committee meetings and stated that Stoneway would concur in proposed covenants addressing concerns of the residents to run with the land. Noting no questions of Mr. DeBoer by the Commission , the Chair- man called for the committee. report . Commissioner Wik , Chairman of the Special Studies Committee , advised that the committee had met on three occasions with the applicant and representatives of the community to discuss aspects of the rezone request and its relationship to the . Comprehensive Plan . He then read the committee ' s report into the record . Items of concern were noted : access ; circulation ; potential traffic impacts , development of the site including possible development through the Planned Unit Development ( P . U . D. ) Ordinance and time-frames for its implementation , preservation of the steep natural hillside area ; and a building height limit, Commissioner Wik reviewed -the potential impact on traffic presented by the proposed development. He noted the Traffic Engineering Division ' s response concerning existing and projected traffic flows along N . E . 3rd Street , potential traf- fic impacts of the proposed rezone and development of the site , and provision for traffic controls including financing should a primary access road be constructed east of Mt . Olivet Ceme- tery . Other committee concerns were noted by Commission Wik : the development of the site so that all zones can be integrated , the time-frame for development, preservation of the steep natural hillside area along the southerly portion of the . property , the availability of utilities , and possible view obstruction . Proposed restrictive covenants addressing major areas of concern were reviewed . Restriction of building heights were discussed , and it was noted by the Planning Director that the R- 1 area is limited to 35 feet at present and that the clause referring to a 35 foot height restriction will apply to the R-2 designated parcel in proximity to Monterey Terrace . Commissioner Wik then advised that the committee recommends approval of the rezone request , the covenants , and considera- tions noted this evening . It is also recommended that should the rezone be granted , the different zoning classifications should be described in legal form and on an exhibit map . Questions from the Commission were invited by the Chairman . Commissioner Teegarden inquired regarding provisions for access , noting that the proposed covenants restrict access to N . E . 3rd from other than Blaine Ave . N . E . 4 Renton Planning Commission • Meeting January 19 , 1977 Page Three The Planning Director discussed the developer ' s responsibility concerning access and typical provisions for roads and utili - 1 ties should development be accomplished as a P . U . D . Mr . Tee- I garden also inquired regarding the definition of the term substantial construction in the proposed restrictive covenants,. The general descriptions of the particular zoning classifica- tions were then discussed . Commissioner Gist raised the question of provision in the restrictive covenants for a traffic light for control of traf- fic onto N . E . 3rd , when the development is first initiated . Discussion followed regarding the current traffic situation at the access of Monterey Terrace to N . E . 3rd , the effect of , development to the east on N . E . 4th and N . E . 3rd , impact of proposed annexation to the east of the subject site , and future opportunity for traffic impact review at the time of development. IT WAS THEN ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA , SECONDED BY GIST, THAT A CLAUSE BE ADDED TO THE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT AT SUCH TIME THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER FEELS TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION IS REQUIRED IT SHALL BE PROVIDED 1 BY THE APPLICANT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The Chairman called for comments in favor of the application . None were offered . Chairman Garrison then called for comments in opposition . Roy Brady , 142 Blaine Ave . N . E . , noting that the Stoneway Com- pany has been a good neighbor , indicated his primary concern is the access situation . He requested that the covenants be more specific regarding the location of the access road . Mr. Brady also indicated that he felt it would be desirable to deadend Blaine Avenue N . E . Lloyd Salter , 76 Monterey P1 . N . E . , stating that he had no objection to the rezone of the property , requested that the covenants be more specific regarding the time of construction of the access road . He suggested that the access road be con- 1 structed prior to issuance of the development permit so that it may be used during the construction period . Discussion among the Commissioners followed relative to the effect of heavy construction equipment on the access road or Blaine Ave . N . E . , should it be used for temporary access dur- ing development . IT WAS THEN ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT UNDER THE CLAUSE "ACCESS" IN THE PROPOSED RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT IT BE SPECIFIED THAT BLAINE AVE. N.E. IS NOT TO BE USED AS TEMPORARY ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION. Further discussion ensued relative to possible hardship to the builder, the impact of construction on the neighborhood , the possibility of establishing a preliminary access road , and the appropriateness of reviewing the question at the time of consideration of the development as a P . U . D. On the question , a roll call vote was requested with the follow- ing results : AKERS - NO MOLA - AYE BUCKINGHAM - NO TEEGARDEN - AYE GIST - NO WALKER - NO KIRKMAN - NO WIK - AYE MOTION FAILED. Renton Planning Commission Meeting January 19 , 1977 Page Four The Chairman invited further comment from the audience . Robert DeBoer of the Stoneway Company indicated that it is his feeling that the restrictive covenants should be limited to aspects regarding the rezone application . He stated that they have no intent on this site for the use of Blaine Ave. N . E . , although it will have to be utilized to bring in equipment to begin the construction of access to N. E . 3rd . Chris Wright , 120 Monterey Pl . N . E . , stated that he would like to see some time limit set on how long the contractor can bring heavy construction equipment up Blaine . Paul Houser, 57 Monterey Dr. , questioned the 35 foot height limit in the R- 1 zone , indicating that it is his feeling that it is a little high . He stated he preferred a natural area buffer along Monterey Terrace . He also noted his concern that the problem of the location of the access ' road should be addressed . William Cokeley , 64 Monterey P1 . N . E . , inquired regarding how construction would be accomplished in the R- 1 zone , noting the topography of the property . It was noted by Mr . DeBoer, the Chairman , and the Planning Director that a definite proposal for development is not avail - able at this time . However, when it is submitted , further public review will be offered . Mr. Salter, noting that construction is going to cause some disruption ,, stated he is more concerned about the quality of the development . Noting no further public input , IT WAS MOVED BY GIST , SECONDED BY WIK, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED. IT WAS THEN ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT WE RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE SUBJECT APPLICATION FOR REZONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COVENANTS THAT WERE PRESENTED THIS EVENING AND AS AMENDED THIS EVENING, NAMELY THE AMENDMENT TO RESTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE R-2 PARCEL TO 35 FEET AND THE AMENDMENT TO THE ACCESS SECTION OF THE COVENANTS THAT THE DEVELOPER INSTALL TRAFFIC LIGHTS WHEN REQUIRED AND DETERMINED AS NECESSARY BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION. MOTION CARRIED. A recess was declared by the Chairman at 10 : 00 p . m. The meeting resumed at 10 : 15 p . m. with all members noted ab ove present . 5- ADMINISTRATIVE: A. COMMITTEE REPORTS No committee reports were offered in response to the Chair- man ' s request . B. COMMITTEE REFERRALS — LISTING UP—DATE The Planning Director noted that the listing was based on the existing committee structure and the purpose of the report was to bring everyone up to date at this time. The Chairman indicated the items would be reviewed later fol - lowing establishment of new committees . ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR STONEWAY SITE The following general descriptions should apply to the particular zoning classification established on the property described below : R- 1 (BUFFER AREA) - PARCEL A The easterly 470 feet of the westerly 720 feet of the northerly 100 feet of the above described property. R-2 - PARCEL B The easterly 800 feet of the westerly 1100 feet of the above described property ; except the R- 1 area (Parcel A) and except that portion defined as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan as revised on May 17 , 1972 , and noted as the hillside area along the south property line and northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR- 169 ) . R-3 - PARCEL C The westerly 800 feet of the above described property except the southerly 1380 feet of the easterly 300 feet thereof. R-4 - PARCEL D The northerly 1100 feet of the westerly 300 feet of the above described property , except the northerly 300 feet thereof. GREENBELT - PARCEL E That portion defined as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan as revised on May 17 , 1972 , and noted as the hillside area along the south property line and northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR- 169 ) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ENTIRE STONEWAY SITE All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M. described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest cornerof the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89 °45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St. S . R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89 °45 ' 17" east . a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . • 111 1 1 Ii1 t•111111 ,I`i0 U \ I . • ,.I1 ,\, ,' i I6� J / j - .. D n r C /• 1 !0 --- ,�. ---- ---- '----- 1 . ;1 f .r .,,f-.r1 1 • i t I r-�l;�— �T / '+ a� /0) 141 A ov'I j" ( N Cl. WRITE CO' _ �/ �"L l7.ea„ • 1 g ;` l•FF3 Ac. Ir4 1.3onc, I , E ® ,/, 1• `1�b '�, - / ,'6 •' r.; `kJ 0.32 Ac M'1, OLIVI I Cl'.MI I I. I?Y 151`, t_ IB.1.11 Ira. �,5' /O \' / -l: 1(i0 rl./2/ ` e tom,-_-•- _;ro.?� / ��14AG. idl 11 11•59, .) . ' ISO i ` 41 ku ;'r15:'I^ + r,c.%,.9 ` • y.r-- I I Ib.I — .^ 14 1 14 'r 112I ;1 'ITT IZ R:;• �35 c,4 I3111`tdI,1 _ 21 If,f __- _ J r -- •..__.- .. —466 � yq ... .b ru;: r19b.35 7— • • I Ili2 i5 i - i 3• I3 .:2i11i , jYd' Wj ti—_ y ° ' L-'' Q • __.._�_ - IZ 3 ;Oy to Q a �. li'?' 1914 . 13 r Ilt II ._ '`� 1 (, -- - _ CEMETERY Q L j 5 P,y o VIT OLIVET '00 9 1 I '1 ] 11 10 F —! ca Z , .•:`))AC Ii Z� a a A'S.' .• f In I I H g .8Is , 1- , • 4 1 11 1 , fi•r 1- '+', � '� L" =; 15 CE'L1E TFRY 1 ==___= --�t 4 lay, !•i.� ! J L ' : n .. •,• r.c 1 Vl r' 1 w15' ;. •,: .� r� I 3.95Ac. 1-.7 213AC i 1 4 1 I \ - i4-PgOaf�y, .a++.ervxeoo .... .,� �I I •i , J: r T^..- / ;,,. • • • . . ... . _." . _ -" _. , ,, • t"a y. /% ` !� ' `, ,_ ..j;:" .F:O-i= • ,. E-�' ,a T.r t 1,;:r, l; ',RAW l ( •' / �`� ° : tom • c vn ; 7 .;1 ." ' w I. f' ..r/-. 0 ?MEL-.to---7.91.-.-7.; _,'jwi).4_3 Acre3 t -atm/"� r /\ , \\A,\ -.„„ - 'o,,,,,,N T ` - -c ram, . 2, Cis ,-= 21M-?z'_.,`', \, 1 y I I.5 '1 Feasti Ars '' �1 ?*RCJ %.I.I J l l (.t, �-� \ c I W � ' ` t I(1 Vdr\v nrin R. Clrn\7I I CO Li \ .,. s\ .-, ''' \ �� A ,.51,45 \,, , -•-_„„ -, • \ ,..• • - "4(4,46 .., .....„.._ ... L' i.- I A •,._ -----'(\ I .. \ -,N '` \_ 4. J 1` / \ \ \ cif ir\ \ \ �` \.•\ Wit"' 4 '1 ' N \ 1 , 3 fi.s.2,:ti,s,X.,,,:k\s.....„....:,,,...N. \ \ .\ 444) • II \\ IN ! CRPACE CORP �, ,: \\ \ \ . '- ` '''N Air • ''.'\ \ \,. : \ ,.., i r.3 . \ ''•,.. -,,_ <,.•,7:-;,. ..,..,--.. *IV � �� n\' `~ ';P."t �+ \ \\\\ \\ j\CT C;.'r SEIANE (s: \,," I, ,� At r� ti . ' ' ��\�L� �a'� 10 0 r25;. -,...s",„,::,,,, -,r,.. s',, / \ P VA.1 i, F:. ,,...,•,,,, .‘,„ ,..,, • / / "\ � 4.tq \\ -�+`, t\ \ \- 61\\ I7J ;' r�W i 57A / \\ i -.... -.:,,,,,•..„--,,,,,-,,, --..., , • \k,‘;‘), ._,, ,.._?,,,Iiii 1 v. /,' . . // .'r . ••-•,.. ., % rr` r ;,>,,� 111 \ I 'l74, / f • 11 ' 3 l i `,\,L 5'r 7`\, \\ •\ / I Q• F-,_ ( 7�r r} i r . '')•-.1 't_::------ I s', . "11:1J I- • r• ti"� \\� o, fi/ f 1 .,e.., ,-.,.:a...:. .D,.::;:f•+nW7lP1"s'iiisuin.k-Y:u{.-hF.i.:zL@#•da:1..a...�-::,ti..�.r.�,':ti;r• ....iLY•..v,::n: ..:•�.raa.'• a .'�S+'._,.vn..- .0:4,±..,i l:.•....de.a1..'„tar. i't1,diL'1s'✓ LY0r...•••1?o •. ..a✓.m:,.wa 1e N.i3„-_ :'.-1.%.-.-:..,_... , •R RE : STONEWAY CONCRE CO . - PUBLIC HEARING 1/•1� Public Notices delivered to Monterey Terrace neighborhood 1/6/77 by Bill Turner. ( 25 ) notices given to Paul Houser for distribution to Monterey Club 1/5/77 . In addition , following mailed : Robert DeBoer Stoneway Concrete Co . P . 0 . Box 509 Renton , WA 98055 Bonneville Power A.dmn . 415 - 1st North Seattle , WA 98109 Seattle City Light 1015 3rd Ave . Seattle , WA 98104 Washington Natural Gas Co . 815 Mercer Seattle , WA 98109 Pushpakant R. Patel Division Engineer Puget Sound Power and Light Co . 620 So . Grady Way Renton , WA 98055 Renton School Dist. No . 403 Attn : Mr. Belmondo 1101 Hoquiam N . E . Renton , WA 98055 Don Smith Record Chronicle 801 Houser Way So . Renton , WA 98055 ,. 1" .!r n t' 1* '4"1" 4, / PUBLIC HEARIPJG <, t, ,- ,)' " A -'`4 CITY OF RENTON �. 11 c jp)11 PLANNING COMMISSION A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON JANJUARY 19, 1977 - 8:00 P.M, TO CONSIDER THE ITEM DESCRIBED BELOW: a 0 REZONE : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC . ; Appl . No . R-891-76 ; rezone from R-1 and S- 1 to R- 1 , R-2 , R-3, and R-4 ; property located east of SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-way. 1 - L—II �' r' , ,,, k 3 rier" ' ' ili r gift• 'Al \I \ 1 / IF rill kj, i •, is e S'1 1t , STONEWAY CONCRETE INC . Q \ �,.mew.0 I'j nerouvEr - , \I REZONE111 Sr Nil 7E J L A CEMETERY 1 1 r I P—I \ 00 , ' 4 101 __ '�� RENTON CITY LlMITS•Telro_l 1 a 7 � r I , ' S I t ` 1 , I ° B-I --e � , \J • } fIr I e Y1 H~I \y � u . . , • s R-2 , , ,/,,.. . w y r i, .4,,,,s ♦ ' 4. THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT COMMENTS IN WRITING, IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT: CITY OF RENTON - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550 MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. RENTON, WA. 98055 4-t-o91 e� (.. , L L/��9 g' Affidavit of Publication .e'� p:.S�: \ � ocl STATE OF WASHINGTON0-1 4 COUNTY OF KING ss• o� �Tif of IAE 'a� aj C1ERK�S OEME E4 Barbara Cam a na "`'4�-`�' wk '"f' being first duly sworn on f•- oath,deposes and says that she is the chief clerk of THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four(4) times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and .. "_ ."_ . - has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four(4)times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton NOTICE CP : • Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the PUBLIC HEARING ; Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, , _"_. RE•N�TiNN - -- •i PLANNI G COMMISSION. '. • Notice of Public I RENTON,WASHINCTO l I , Washington.That the annexed is a A public hearing win be g Hearings Planning Commission - Petitions held by the Heaton Planning at its"regater� - - jme�'eting�In the .gounc:i • • - ?cMamtier0i.eity,;t- ,pier-rw MAX as it was published in regular,issues(and 41/1/ mgton rg January-t % not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period -19- • at'00 cor:?3; er thesfgl wigg petitions: R'EZON:E;F ROM'R-1 • D;8 one ANS'-1��TO�, R-2, - of consecutive issues,commencing on the R- `c'�N©aR-4; N 187j6„ r�operty lobe •• 9 east o�f��S� Rr169°(Map'Ue r" day of January nua r 19 77 ,and ending the , Valle'1i F hwa south'.of, • Y..9 9 : Y)� Monterey?Reo a .and° Mt"Olivet Comet ry and:. day of ,19 both dates "west of Bonneville Power,=.1 Ri ht=of-wa -, ' ..inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- g may • ,..' scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee ATI interested personso.i said petitions are:invited;to, 1 99 be ptres' e at"the'planning charged for the foregoing II,, which "�` 'g g g publication is the sum of $..!-1-....., com�ssicn+:meeting`on , has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the •January 19,1 Y ER 8:00- first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent p rrn;:att•o.[ aX P insertion. opinions �� 4, w v -., y, Sandra I I Ren`ton,Plann ingCommis-: chief clerk Published in-the'Rcnon• Record-Chronicle,January• 9, 1977. R4116. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 9 day of `- January , 19.7.7... �' � o �� Rfirikta 0 Notary Publi in nd for the State of Was ' ton, J i residing at Kent, King unty. AN 26 Z i v 1g>> ,r .."..... "........ —Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 22 �~�'�• 9th, 1955. .' /y c, —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, `=.Y, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C.Form No.87 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION . RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON JANUARY 19 , 1977 , AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : REZONE FROM R- 1 AND S- 1 TO R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 AND R-4 ; file No . R-891-76 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple Valley Highway ) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-Way . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON JANUARY 19 , 1977 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . SANDRA GIST , SECRETARY PUBLISHED January 9 , 1977 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , MICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE• ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn �� /J to before me , a Notary Public-., ; on the . day of l,'i(t 19 // . ._ rP IMINARY A DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENAM JECT TO REVISION WHEREAS, Stoneway Concrete , Inc . , a firm incorporated in the State of Washington , is the owner of real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Govern- ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : • Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88° 52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec-- . tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . WHEREAS, the owner of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant , • and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to • the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : DEVELOPMENT • Any and all development of the subject property shall be subject to City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordi - nance , Chapter 27 , Title IV , ( Building Regulations ) of Ordinance 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton . " A master development plan for the entire parcel shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Renton pursuant to the abovementioned ordinance prior to preparation of specific development plans . • OPEN SPACE The hillside slope area along the south property line northeast of Maple Valley Highway ( SR- 169 ) , indicated as greenbelt on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan as revised May 17 , 1972 , shall be retained in its natural state . No buildings , structures , roads , drive- ways , or parking shall be constructed in said greenbelt area . / — / 7 F I M ' ACCESS A primary d►Cce ,, I.ree I. t,h.► I 1 he provided Lu o I.h►, from N . E . Third Street , subject to City of Renton approval of its design and location as part of the total develop- ment plan . Access to existing Blaine Avenue N . E . shall be for emergency purposes only . A suitable barrier and gate shall be constructed at the existing south terminus of Blaine Avenue N . E . subject to Renton Traffic Division and Fire Department approval . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that if a master plan for total develop- ment of the property is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance within two (2 ) years and substantial construction begun within three ( 3) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter , the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document . The term "substantial construction" shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the abovementioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance , or construction of required utilities for such development . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoin- ing subject property who are adversely affected by said breach : STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . By y President By - - - - -- --- - --- Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this day of , 19 , before me personally appeared ------- ^ , - . - ----- and , to me known to be t h e --- a n d----_--------�-- _ --- , respectively , of STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned , and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal, of said corporation . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and ' year first above written . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing at -_ PROPOSED ADDENDUM TO COVENANTS - STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC, : BUILDING HEIGHT No building or structure shall exceed a height of thirty- five ( 35 ) feet when located within the westerly 1100 feet of above described property. I I `1 is /j L. PLANNING COMMISSION • RENTON,'WASHINGTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING • RENTON. WASHINGTON 98055 • 235-2550 ..y 0 Tf=% sE131 January 18 , 1977 TO : Members , Planning Commission FROM: Special Studies Committee , Bylund Wik , Chairman RE : STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . , REZONE APPLICATION R-891-76 MEETINGS HELD : Two committee meetings have been held on November 18 , 1976 , and January 6 , 1977 , to discuss the proposed rezone with concerned residents of the area and the applicant . Another meeting prior to the Planning Commission meeting on Janu- ary 19 , 1977 , was scheduled . FACTS AND CONSIDERATIONS : 1 . The area residents were primarily concerned about access on Blaine Ave . N . E. from the higher density area when developed . The committee reviewed the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the area together with the general cir- culation element providing for future access to N . E . 3rd Street . The committee felt that only emergency vehicle access should be allowed to Blaine Ave . N . E . from any future development of the subject site . 2 . The committee also studied the matter of potential traffic impacts to N . E . 3rd St . with the creation of a new street located east of Mt . Olivet Cemetery. They asked for a - report from the Traffic Engineering Division . (See attached report . ) 3 . Another major committee concern is the development of the site , and adequate city control of such development . It was felt that the degree of impact to the surrounding community will ultimately depend on the planning and specific development . The committee therefore reviewed with the applicant the possibility of development through the Planned Unit Development ( P . U . D . ) Ordinance . This was agreeable with the applicant and assures further city control of the specific development aspects of the property . "embers , Planning Commission January 18 , 1977 =age Two 4 . The committee -also reviewed possible provisions for stimulating development of the property within a rea- sonable time period, rather than granting the rezone only to allow the resale of the property while the site remains undeveloped as is the case in other areas of the city. The committee established reasonable time frames for master planning and commencing develop- ment to be two and three years respectively . 5 . The committee is also concerned about preservation of the steep natural hillside area along the southerly portion of the property. The applicant proposed to maintain the area in its natural state . The committee is in full agreement with this concept . 6 . The question of utilities was studied . It was felt that present city requirements were sufficient to insure adequate utilities for future development . A 16 inch water main exists along N . E . 3rd Street , and a Metro Sewer Interceptor is available along Maple Valley Highway . 7 . The committee studied possible view obstruction to adjacent properties resulting from development of the site . The height limit of the R-2 zoning classification , which would be most proximate to Monterey Terrace if the rezone were approved , together with the 100 foot buffer area previously established by restrictive covenant , may provide sufficient height limitations and view protection . However, because of the height limit flexibility of the P . U . D. Ordinance an additional clause regarding maximum heights near Monterey Terrace should be added to the restrictive covenants . 8. The committee studied means of assuring that the above consideration would be secured as part of the rezone . The attached restrictive covenants involve the major areas of concern and would run with the land to guide its general development. The committee also feels that if the rezone is granted , the different zoning classifications on the subject site should be specifically described in legal form and on an exhibit map similar to that which is attached . -- • ----' MEMORANDUM • . • DATE: January 17, 1977 C--' TO: Del Bennett l4 FROM: Paul Lumbert Tcapc 1( SUBJECT. Stoneway Concrete -- Request fOr"Rezone •; ; ; •,- The following traffic data is in response,to the Planning Department mem.:, •regarding the rezone request by Stoneway ConcAte, Inc. 1. The existing traffic volume oat NE, 3rd Street at Blaine Ave. NE is 21,612 vehicles per day. The projected volume in twenty years will be 38,902 vehicles per day. 2. Approximately 700 to 900 vehicle trips would be generated by 300 - 350 multi-family residences. That would put say an additional 1,000 vehicles per day into the traffic flow . on NE 3rd Street. 3. Stop signs would control traffic exiting this new roadway initially with increased control. (traffic signal, channelization, • etc.) later as the traffic. volume,..grows. NE 3rd Street traffic is generated from a large area: that has a vast • ;- potential for future development and the traffic volume will grow at the, same rate as the area:development. The additional roadway nets as indicated on the comprehensive land use plan would help to disperse the traffic entering and exiting NE 3rd Street which would tend to lessen the impact of traffic at any one point. PL:ad /7:0 R • .1\\ /;'/N RECENED ° :1( JAN 17 1977 '--7 (zy OF R� THE CITY OF RENTON ,' ©' o MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 nC„ °' CHARLES J. DELAURENTI ; MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT �Q- 235-2550 4TFD SEPZ . January 13, 1977 MEMORANDUM RECEPAED TO : Del Bennett , Traffic Engineering Division JAN 13 1977 ti FROM : Michael Smith , Planning Department CITY OPrieurom Pu®siC WORKS RE : STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . , REZONE REQUEST The Planning Commission Special Studies Committee is pre- sently reviewing the subject request . The committee has requested additional information and response from the Traffic Engineering Division regarding : 1 . Existing and projected traffic flows along N . E . 3rd Street. 2 . Potential traffic impacts of the proposed rezone and development of the site (approximately 300-350 additional units ) . 3 . What type of traffic controls , if any , would be necessary at N . E . 3rd St . , if a primary access road were constructed east of Mt . Olivet Cemetery to serve the development? (See the attached copy of the Comprehensive Plan for the area with the general location of such a street indicated . ) Who would be responsible for financing such traffic controls ? The committee would appreciate your review and response as soon as possible. MLS :wr Attachments . _ ,— - T - - _i . i -tl �IT }. .� I ) . I .- •�f,' � ' t ' 4/ - /) � : l, ir.'''I • iv;'rl : %� _;11 !_..-- --+_-r - • ,j�ir • r7� ' 'fi . . �' ....11.t 7 ^i1)!S'trT. + `%1 r � ! ] r.,. 1, TiJV / V•.V .. — �® =__ �} .e. .. - l —fli � +i'\ 1w`'�— "l IT,v'e,1' } � f: *r c c-. ..� /�— � m 111 ! 1 1 : y ?�1'� �1�'. � 4' •`-k ;•://1) � ;( h Sr ''' � � r + ( 1( 1 ji jI 4t,,_• ' 'r - t /•'1JJi. ).1.1�,', F �..1.)1'+� , . •/rd'� 5 t + , I ,s-"•? .'4ri"--, r }-, jh'f1 (iier'�;i) r" ,,`l •ifJr (, •/ I I I w �c �- r, l{i ., ',` , J{, '�'I1 � I I 11111 I !1 ' , .'_a -'a . . (?(1c it1/ • •' / S. .'t r• f h l 1 , �J „�T1 i i j iiIi .rthf' r I1) " ),^V ,,•r •; ,► . !•1 ' I IWitH� L "{:, ' -'..� co . J �)y`s J' a ',-,ame-4• \ ' , //, ' I • � j` { II . t ` - I ( ( /n, * lItrf /' • •. 1 ` '� -:`-:'\ 'id,`I',m iaisc o •)!R. l} ` P'.,, 7/1.- ITS, 1 ' , ? :;ti'~ � tit . ■■n-■■Unlit Be t 41 J •�:,,: : ;:, _ mac::-, �: \ • N _ '\� I'• J\`t _ >o l Tt - .a9. . Zeman; - � _ - E� . o ,- "STONEWAY EXHIBIT A" as revised March 8 , 1972 I PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE CITY OF RENTON ' S COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Property Description: That general area included within the follow_::::-. boundaries, FAI 405 , NE 3rd and 4th streets , Union Avenue NE and SE, and the bluff line north of Maple Valley Highway. LEGEND I 1 Single Family Residential Public Use or •'n , s_- ��/�(�l Low Density Multi Family Res . ' ~ Recreation • ' ' I ' f Greenbelt:•.=---±u Duns, yMulti Family Res . F� � . T -,c i r‘,• . .. 1..t i FamLLv Re_�._ ?�oposeC �'oule-.'_•- ' •1 III •1 Ill ItI II I I)Il � `;� \\ c l 1 I', A./ ; ---__- -- I/ 1 lc,i I p ()1, 1\f, • \ ° I. \- . \(s1 \IN...t........ !_�_____-----_-- --- - 1, ,A C / .1e1� II ti ... ;7- - ,, ilrii,• _ ell: I .1 . I . , i / e ti--77.dd - 0/ ''.'".. ICI:, ig'..2 / e) 4G/e o.3zneI. MT. UI.IVI -1 CE-.rat_ IL Y I, •�, 1, ,, 8 - _ZlQ 3^_... ... . 3 44 AG. J 150 17 1,5115t,1 `. % 152 U 3rAc. ' T. . i � • ' y > Mc.h 14 a- 1IJJ133: I yIe i �l�121 1Z 'j IZ P — _ n - Y_ 7- -- --J66 yj 1 12' - ? 15 I4 • Ii 1 1i f341 -II I - I. �IL—I Q IO IQIG7 IOb I" 51 1Q 'I' B IZ 1 I I 101 13 123 • 12 II ...... r Iti 5139 GOO ILLI \t : Fle OLIVET CEMETERY — n f 1n' — I zn I A En :, 81831 F..... - a. 11.; ! 1 ,II I 561 i s .,_, •R •4•'Y' MT OLIVET I 'I` _ _ /I �k ?5 �^ \"� 04 1_ •,; 15 �✓ CEMETERY ----— It ,a,laa, /•') It \• �sr r � 1 . - 1 . .I�,'I�V ry ! ,nC i •srl• •. •-•.., .•, I 3.95 Ac. 10 2 'i; 1, r Lir v, u ff �� .,,2 .,; i--'; 3 'i L2J C;- "! Q. . 1 T� to S19 _ _.. , ¢ i -.7p — f I fh7 1-1� �•-'#' 1 t�i ,_,l40 / •4{.I :t•,•. :)I(?i 1: >1?f'r� n iiiZR�J' I ( J / A .2.• i I 5,•. 3.23 �,c. I ; I I _ • 't, t ^1 ;7 \ --_ .1. "fix. _...C,__. . it- Acre3 4.. x �' • I t 1 4 �/ •` / ' '' pktitegis. . ! mat.. 'ef.‘ I J't I (.,, 1. '\\ c' -- - �' 1 1 O . --� \ ,!� 7$� I ll f till/\\ t I �,ll 5 I •••• ..5 .„,,,,.t. • \ ,. ,,,,, - \ ".. .. -"'i'u'le,wy} L -iA—,.''1.v. 4�'''�;;'y. .,...... Ur ``..__________._ • Ifs\\. • \\ \,`. """4-4 qL�I i . ,..,% )14 \\ . \1. \. \\`' \ \ V� 3 rGAC. \ c�`: � '� \ i rr�/vi:. [./ram r �r ,\,'\\\\\ ./ N. \ ` I jolt \�ir..\•.\ 44 . \`., IN1 CRPACE CORP \\L\,,„1.,.,n \ t :'.'-> it', .'M.c.). \ N 15 1ni 11 I1 \,\A1,A G:\---O\V\.t 1a.; \Nf1••,.•`. r .\ ‘\4 fie\•'A•\ .., ;'1''"r Al ':nq.. '. ''`'-r-\ \' \ I I N Y -.44,7,, • •_25-. „,,„ , -1,--,_, ..., .- -- —_._ _ . __ 1 \ , \ \ \ /'':7• i , /1/ 4 cc.....N.,••,''.1-,. .- ....-,,. . . , "k. ti \-'-.-*--- N; )71 I:i;5 1 ' 1.-, ''' '.' .''' • : `n w • 13,03 AC, % \' 11, t 1° I ',s \ t � 1 r :./..... rc i, s>\ \^r 1 '' 9 \' \ I I -?: ?'�6, r 0 ..../ '.--::---- - ':(17;f:..:' 1 .--"--' j .. I' I '- „\ 7 / /` c 1, • •.rid.,... .;'.1rt�ii4i.tt;t l.i: e.riris .`•.'? Y�144�x1!p,.ex,4,*s?VfF..x ,d i��•�!z�']Ens,.1'.'f+4S.,.>::;=,::,'.�tfvCi;.:'i�ti+Mi<i{ V i':2v n.-.:.'i!,', :.i erTl:�u:.k La.Kr_^s.,• F:'11,4%,,,ti9a:3.rilef.ih:e..,,,,,Q..,'4uu: i',t?r,:s,e::..I N: _:..toe;•:....7'..,rs�». Au2.-...'.: '•.-.-.-... . . •1 • ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR STONEWAY SITE The following general descriptions should apply to the particular zoning classification established on the property described below : R- 1 ( BUFFER AREA) - PARCEL A The easterly 470 feet of the westerly 720 feet of the northerly 100 feet of the above described property . R-2 - PARCEL B The easterly 800 feet of the westerly 1100 feet of the above described property ; except the R- 1 area ( Parcel A) and except that portion defined as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan as revised on May 17 , 1972 , and noted as the hillside area along the south property line and northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR- 169 ) . R-3 - PARCEL C The westerly 800 feet of the above described property except the southerly 1380 feet of the easterly 300 feet thereof. R-4 - PARCEL D The northerly 1100 feet of the westerly 300 feet of the above described property , except the northerly 300 feet thereof. GREENBELT - PARCEL E That portion defined as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan as revised on May 17 , 1972 , and noted as the hillside area along the south property line and northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR- 169 ) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ENTIRE STONEWAY SITE All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to th'e true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17.; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St . S . R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89 °45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A". and the true point of beginning . } , • PkUMNARY SUBJECT TO REVISION DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Stoneway Concrete , Inc . , a firm incorporated in the State of Washington , is the owner of real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Govern- ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . WHEREAS, the Owner .of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant , . and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to. the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : DEVELOPMENT Any and all development of the subject property shall be subject to City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordi - nance , Chapter 27 , Title IV , ( Building Regulations ) of Ordinance 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton . " A master development plan for the entire parcel shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Renton pursuant to the abovementioned ordinance prior to preparation of specific development plans . • OPEN SPACE The hillside slope area along the south property line northeast of Maple Valley Highway ( SR- 169 ) , indicated as greenbelt on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan as revised May 17 , 1972 , shall be retained in its natural state . No buildings , structures , roads , drive- ways , or parking shall be constructed in said greenbelt area . ►y A primary access street shall be provided to the site from N . E . Third Street , subject to City of Renton approval of its design and location as part of the total develop- ment plan . Access to existing Blaine Avenue N . E . shall be for emergency purposes only . A suitable barrier and gate shall be constructed at the existing south terminus of Blaine Avenue N . E . subject to Renton Traffic Division and Fire Department approval . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that if a master plan for total develop- ment of the property is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance within two (2 ) years and substantial construction begun within three ( 3) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter , the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document . The term " substantial construction" shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the abovementioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance , or construction of required utilities for such development . Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoin- ing subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . By —.. President • By - - - -- — - - - Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING On this day of , 19 , before me personally appeared and , to me known to be the and respectively , of STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation . for the uses and purposes therein mentioned , and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing at e 400.- PROPOSED ADDENDUM TO COVENANTS - STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC BUILDING HEIGHT No building or structure shall exceed a height of thirty- five ( 35 ) feet when located within the westerly 1100 feet of above described property. (��-� • . r / �� /% `,. •�, 1 's � _--_ stir ' ♦ /LPG 1 s I is I. Ir ',al�'iii, I� r Y• + ,- G Rq Er k4 lib i ' i . \ .‘ GS-I „4.4 ,' /' - i-- CEM 0 Ai _ .1 . \ , _ii,,,,,:pf . I iiii 7'` / ,„ ,Ri! / "r ." dig R-4 \_„\\ \\ ill—,... / y7 , :, __--_- ----::---- 4/, l 4,11111% .,c A\ / /� °ti g1r..te .�i k. 11 STONEWAY CNCRETE , INC . l. vis:..I� j I n'rOLIVET .. 1 I REZONE ei NT, I' CEMETERY 11 P I ' �' 1 , � Irlir , -- eRENTON CITY LIMITS Alliilliik .----- ,,-_--,..-__„._-,., \ 4 \ \ // 1 1 l /Q/ r 1 i I1 1 1) .*\ 11 `, R ri ' ` 7 . ., . mit ,. " posipik .. H.1 �� .„p.. i/' 1 2 �goo® m. , G ' ' " • . '---- ---.----- • 0 y REZONE : STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC. ; Appl . No . R-891-76 ; rezone from R- 1 and S- 1 to R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 ; property located east of SR- 169 '(Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-way . ±43 . 1 acres with . APPLICANT STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . TOTAL AREA 24.0 buildable area PRINCIPAL ACCESS East side of Mt . Olivet Cemetary . EXISTING ZONING R- 1 , S- 1 and GS- 1 EXISTING. USE Abandoned gravel pit. , Rezone to Higher Density from R-1 through R-4 for PROPOSED USE future residential development. Single family, low density, medium density COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN and high density multi-family; greenbelt along steep hillside above Maple Valley Highway. COMMENTS 2ND T1, DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Stoneway Concrete , Inc . , a firm incorporated in the State of Washington , is the owner of real property in the City of Renton , County of King , State of Washington , described as follows : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Govern- ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of th.e Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . WHEREAS, the owner of said described property desires to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use , present and future , of the above described real property . NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish , grant, and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned , their successors , heirs and assigns , as follows : DEVELOPMENT Any and all development of the subject property shall be subject to City of Renton approval and shall comply with all the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Ordi - nance , Chapter 27 , Title IV , ( Building Regulations ) of Ordinance 1628 known as "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton . " A master development plan for the entire parcel shall be submitted to and approved by the. City of Renton pursuant to the abovementioned ordinance prior to preparation of specific development plans . OPEN SPACE The hillside slope area along the south property line northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR- 169 ) , indicated as greenbelt on the City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Plan as revised May 17 , 1972 , shall be retained in its natural state . No buildings , structures , roads , drive- ways , or parking shall be constructed in said greenbelt area . 2ND CCq� e {sk: +4g pl. 1114 1 -17-77 ACCESS A primary access street shall be provided to the site from N . E . Third Street , subject to City of Renton approval of its design and location as part of the total develop- ment plan . Access to existing Blaine Avenue N . E . shall be for emergency purposes only . A suitable barrier and gate shall be constructed at the existing south terminus of Blaine Avenue N . E . subject to Renton Traffic Division and Fire Department approval . DURATION These covenants shall run with the land and expire on December 31 , 2050 . It is further agreed and covenanted by the undersigned that if a master plan for total develop- ment of the property is not submitted to the City of Renton pursuant to the Renton Planned Unit Development Ordinance within two (2 ) years and substantial construction begun within three ( 3 ) years of the filing of these covenants , and said construction and development diligently prosecuted toward completion thereafter , the zoning of said property shall without further City action revert back to the zoning which existed prior to the filing of this document . The term "substantial construction" shall mean the physical alteration of the land for construction pursuant to City approved development plans as per the abovementioned Planned Unit Development Ordinance , or construction of required utilities for such development. Any violation or breach of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoin- ing subject property who are adversely affected by said breach . STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . By President By Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of , 19 , before me personally appeared " and , to me known to be the and respectively , of STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . , the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument , and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned , and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation . IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing at 4 OF 11 © z THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 0.13 CHARLES J. DELAURENTI , MAYOR • PLANNING DEPARTMENT p� q- 235-2550 qT.tO SEP1*-�0 • January 13, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO : Del Bennett , Traffic Engineering Division FROM : Michael Smith , Planning Department RE : STONEWAY CONCRETE ,' INC . , REZONE REQUEST The Planning Commission Special Studies Committee is pre- sently reviewing the subject request. The committee has requested additional information and response from the Traffic Engineering Division regarding :. 1 . Existing and projected traffic flows along N. E . 3rd Street . 2 . Potential traffic impacts of the proposed rezone and development of the site (approximately 300-350 additional units ) . 3 . What type of traffic controls , if any., would be necessary at N . E . 3rd St . , if a primary access road were constructed east of Mt . Olivet Cemetery to serve the development? ( See the attached copy of the Comprehensive Plan for the area with the general location of such a street indicated . ) Who would be responsible for financing such traffic controls? The committee would appreciate your review and response as soon as possible. • MLS :wr Attachments O� Rj -4 j, ., THE CITY OF RENTON 0p z MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 n CHARLES J. DELAURENTI p MAYOR e PLANNING DEPARTMENT �Q. 4T fD 235-2550 O,fl SEPSE�O MEMORANDUM December 13 , 1976 TO: George Perry, Chairman Council Planning & Development Committee FROM: Gordon Y. Ericksen, Planning Director RE: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING - STONEWAY Due to the complex nature of the request, the Stoneway application was originally continued to January 12 , 1977 . In view of the conflict with the initial planning seminar on the 12th, the Commission recom- n -. the Stoneway public hearing be held on January 19th. Since the Stoneway application will be the sole item on the agenda, I see no reason why the hearing cannot be concluded -ate-that date. OA? r / GYE :wr G� v � cc: Mayor h// �s e v a c6 r/6 /1/4 g, (fi„, 01 I rr cf eir Renton Planning Commission Meeting December 8 , 1976 Page Fourteen Committee stated that he has already gone on record as being opposed to such an installation , and he did not wish to prejudice the Commission ' s action . The Chairman then referred the matter to the Special Studies Committee and - requested additional staff input. B. 'COMMITTEE REPORTS It was noted that all committee reports had been given earlier this evening in connection with business before the Commission . C, PROPOSED PLANNING SEMINAR — STATE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The Chairman referred the Commission to his memorandum regard- ing a proposed planning seminar offered by the Washington State Office of Community Development tentatively scheduled for January 12 , February . 9 ,''and March 16 , 1977 . It was noted that the intent is to conduct an orientation session , study state laws , bring the Commission up-to-date , and also to discuss any specific items the Commission may wish to con- sider. The Commission ' s attention was directed to two docu- ments - that had been distributed that would be the basis for discussion : ".Land Use Planning in the State of Washington : The Role of Local Government" and " Ideas and Resources from the Small Towns Institute--Planning for Quality of Life and Economic Prosperity in your Community. " Ron Clark of the Office of Community Development will hold the meetings in Renton . ' Favorable discussion among the Commissioners :followed. It was the general consensus that the seminar would provide a good basis for the new role of the Commission . It was also noted that other City officials and representa- tives would be encouraged to participate . • D. OTHER The matter of review of the STONEWAY REZONE APPLICATION that had been continued to January 12 , 1977 , was con- ' sidered. The complexity of the request was discussed . Fol -, lowing discussion , IT WAS ACTION: ' ' - MOVED BY GIST, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE PLANNING COM— MISSION MAKE A REQUEST TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY BE GRANTED PERMISSION TO CONTINUE AND CONCLUDE THE STONEWAY CONCRETE COMPANY REZONE APPROVAL REQUEST IN THE MONTH OF JANUARY. MOTION CARRIED. . The Chairman requested that the staff advise the Council of their action . In view .of the proposed seminar and the need to restructure the Planning Commission , IT WAS 0 ACTION: MOVED BY •TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY WALKER, THAT THE PLANNING DIRECTOR CHANGE THE PUBLIC HEARING FROM JANUARY 12 TO JANUARY 19, 1977, IF THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZES THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO CONTINUE THEIR WORK ON THE STONEWAY MATTER . MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Renton Planning Commission Meeting December 8, 1976 Page Thirteen • • EXCEPTION TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE : • F, EMMETT KINDLE ; Appl . E-900-76 ; request for exception to. subdivision ordinance for a three-lot short plat ; property • located in the vicinity of 2625 Jones Ave . N . E . • The Chairman opened the item for consideration and requested staff review. The Planning Director and Associate Planner Smith advised . that the applicant has revised his request • from a three- lot short plat to a four-lot short plat and is requesting an. exception to the Subdivision Ordinance .to allow • serving the two rear . lots with 170 foot long pipestems . • Alternatives laere considered ; lot sizes were noted ; and .access • • was reviewed. It was indicated that the proposed configuration would allow for best utilization of the property , and the staff recommends .approval . Commission discussion followed concerning off-site improvements ; . existing improvements were noted ; and Associate Planner, Smith advised that the applicant, is aware of Subdivision Ordinance requirements but has not asked for a waiver of off-site improve- ments . ' The Planning Director advised that the Planning Commis sion ' recommendation would be submitted .to the City Council and indicated findings that . the Commission must make prior ' to any .recommendation for approval . Location of the pipestems .,adja- . cent to each other were cited . • Further Planning Commission review ensued., and the following were considered : location , width , and length of the pipestems ; the possibility of a cul -de-sac configuration ; and provisions • for access . It was noted that the questi.on ..before the Commis- sion was ,whether • or not. it is reasonable that .the pipestems be 170 feet in length rather than 150 feet as required by ordi - nance . Considration was also ' given to the conditions for improvement of the .pipestem. IT WAS THEN MOVED BY WALKER, . SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED . ' . The following action was then taken : . ACTION: MOVED BY WALKER, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE ALTERNATIVE FOUR-LOT SHORT PLAT (EXHIBIT B) WITH TWO 170 FOOT PIPESTEMS, SIDE BY SIDE AND IMPROVED TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6- ADMINISTRATIVE: A, COUNCIL REFERRAL: • • KENNETH R . ZEHM TO BUILD A MARINA AS PART OF THE LAKE WASHINGTON BEACH PARK DEVELOPMENT . The Chairman ' suggested that the item be referred to committee . for study and recommendation and discussion in January and requested that Mr. Zehm present his proposal . • The Planning Director advised that the Park Board is presently considering the comprehensive development of Lake Washington • Beach Park . The Council has requested Planning' Commission study of the request. Discussion followed regarding the appropriate committee for referral , inasmuch as Commissioner Teegarden of the Land Use - r MEETING NOTES MEETING : PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE DATE: November 18, 1976 SUBJECT: STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . , FILE NO. R-891-76 ATTENDANCE: Bylund Wik , Chairman ; Tony Mola , Committee member; Michael Smith , Planning Department; Robert DeBoer, Stoneway Concrete ; Jim Colt, Mt. Olivet Cemetery. DISCUSSION : 1 . Briefly reviewed the site characteristics , surround- ing uses , zoning , Comprehensive Plan , utilities , and access problems related to the subject request. 2 . Both the applicant and committee felt that alternate access was necessary. The eventual closing of Blaine Ave . to the site and its utilization for emergency access only was discussed. 3. Potential densities and possible development under the P. U . D. Ordinance were discussed. The applicant agreed that P. U. D. development would be the most applicable alternative for the site . 4. The committee also reviewed the possibility of the zoning, if granted , reverting back to its existing zoning if a master P. U. D. plan is not submitted and construction begun within certain established time periods . 5. The committee discussed the options of contract zoning and conditional zoning with restrictive covenants running with the land establishing certain specific conditions of approval . 6 . View obstructions and open space related to the - site were also reviewed . 7 . It was indicated to the applicant that an Environ- mental Impact Statement will more than likely be required at the time of development . CONCLUSIONS : The committee felt that staff should explore further the alternatives of contract zoning and conditional zoning and the detailed conditions that would be necessary. Proper safeguards to the community, access controls , and development controls , and reversionary zoning were the primary concerns of the committee . RE : PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING, NOV . 10TH STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC. ACTION : REFERRED TO SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT BACK JANUARY 11 , 1977 . Speaking for the application : Robert DeBoer, General Mgr. / Stoneway o 0 Speaking against the application : ✓Donald Capps — 63 Monterey Dr. ./Chris Wright ;�•*° ` : 'F`'" `/ 120 Monterey P1 . N . E . Margaret Wright " f 120 Monterey P1 . N . E . fr Gary McKnight 58 Monterey / Louis Peretti '"'' " ' 115 Monterey P1 . N . E . Harold Lee 77 Monterey Pl . N . E . ✓Lloyd Salter s' S- d77 �i 76 Monterey P1 . N . E . -?5X - U27h/ 6 Greatest concern expressed : ADEQUATE ACCESS Some suggestions : Two ( 2 ) accesses - not through Monterey Terrace. Going east of Mt. Olivet Cemetery . Blocking off of Blaine Ave . N . E . Special Studies Committee - 7 : 30 p . m. , Nov. 18th , 3rd fl . conf. rm. // L�e r/. evz a,v� . '-gy/-76 Renton Planning Commission Meeting November 10, 1976 • Page Three 2. A 20 ' SETBACK FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILD- ING SIZE ON LOT "A. " 3. PROVISION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK WHICH EXTENDS NO MORE THAN 6 ' INTO THE SETBACK FROM THE WATER'S EDGE. APPROVAL IS FURTHER SUBJECT TO THE REPLATTING OF THE SIX LOTS INTO FOUR LOTS, CONFIGURATION OF EACH TO BE APPROXI- MATELY 62 ' IN WIDTH, AND PROVISION FOR ADEQUATE PARKING AND TURNAROUND AND ACCESS ON MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. Commissioner Wik indicated his desire to amend the motion to include the reasons for the variance as follows : 1 . THE APPLICATION DOES APPLY TO SECTION 8. 02. 01 WITH REGARD TO EXCEPTIONAL OR EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS WHICH APPLY TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR TO THE INTENDED USE THEREOF THAT DO NOT APPLY GENERALLY TO OTHER. PROPERTIES OR SHORELINES IN THE SAME VICINITY. 2. THE APPLICATION DOES APPLY TO SECTION 8 . 02. 03, WHICH STATES THE VARIANCE PERMIT WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO PROPERTY ON THE SHORELINES IN THE VICINITY. 3. THE VARIANCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF PROPERTY RIGHTS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8 . 02. 02. The Vice-chairman polled the affirmative votes for approval of the variance, Commissioners Gist and Mola . Both indicated • their agreement . MOTION CARRIED, Teegarden dissenting. 5- NEW BUSINESS : Items of new business were opened for consideration by the Vice- chaarman . REZONE: A, STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC. ; Appl . No. R-891- 76 ; rezone from R- 1 , S- 1 , and GS- 1 to R- 1 , R-2 , R- 3 , and R-4 ; also hillside area to remain as greenbelt ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery and west of the powerline right-of-way . At the request of the Vice-chairman , the Planning Director reviewed the Stoneway Concrete rezone application , noting the following : size and location of the site ; relationship to residential areas , roadways , and other significant development in the vicinity; Comprehensive. Plan designations.; topography of the parcel ; and former use. Mr. Ericksen noted previous action relative to the Comprehensive Plan designations which include restrictive covenants with reference to the property near the Monterey Terrace residential development that provide ' for a buffer area adjacent to the residential area . Proposed rezone configurations were described and greenbelt areas indi - cated . The matter of access was discussed , and the Planning Director noted that at the time of Comprehensive Plan review it was indicated that an alternative access should be considered . It was also noted that the applicant does not proposed to develop. the property and does not have any specific plans other than selling it. • Renton 'P1"anni ng "Commi ss..,,.r '. . : - • • ., Meeting November 10, . 1976 . .. . • Page Four • . . • Slides , maps ; and aerial photographs denoting the character of the area were viewed. Previous use of the site was described ; covenants pursuant to the concerns of the residents- of Monterey Terrace established in conjunction with a study of the Compre- hensive Plan in March 1972: were noted ; and current land use in the vicinity was cited. . Comments from the applicant were invited by the Vice-chairman . • . Robert DeBoer, General Manager, Stoneway Concrete, stated that • they were basing their application on Ordinance 2708 dated April 1972 , relative to the study of the Comprehensive. Plan in the area and associated restrictive covenants . He indicated that they have a prospective buyer and that ,the sale is dependent upon rezone approval as requested . . A review of the provisions of the covenants ensued , including a discussion of the concerns expressed by the residents of i ' Monterey Terrace at the time of the Comprehensive Plan study , in the area• . Vice-chairman Walker called for comments from the audience in . ' favor of the proposal . None were received . She then invited • ' comments in opposition . . Comments expressing the need for additional access east of Mt. • Olivet Cemetery , rather than. through Monterey Terrace , were offered by those - listed below: Donald Capps Chris Wright . 63 Monterey Drive 120 Ponterey P1 . N . E. . Gary McKnight Louis Peretti ' ' 58 Monterey 115 Monterey P1 . N . E. .. • Margaret Wright Harold Lee . 120 Monterey PT . N. E. 77 Monterey " P1 . N . E. • Lloyd Salter . . • 76 Monterey P1 . N. E. In addition , concerns were. indicated relating to increased density , potential 'vandalism, noise , traffic control , notifica-' • tion of other ' interested parties , and the need for further . study . ' Alternative- access. through the Maple Valley Highway was recom- • mended. • It Was also suggested by Mr. . Salter that Blaine 'Ave . N. E .' be closed by the City. Following indications by the Commission that further review was necessary , IT WAS . ACTION: • . MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE STONEWAY CONCRETE COMPANY APPLICATION FOR REZONE BE CONTINUED AND REFERRED' TO THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT-BACK. • . Discussion ensued- relative to an appropriate time for report ' back, and the ' following factors were considered : the antici - pated lengthy agenda for the next scheduled public hearing , the effect of the new Planning Commission and Land Use Hearings Examiner Ordinances , possible continuation of Comprehensive Plan application review to January , expected applications for December review, the possibility of' an extra public hearing , • and personal holiday commitments . In response to an inquiry concerning the effect of waiting until January for a decision , Mr. DeBoer of Stoneway indicated that time would be satisfactory . ' ', • Renton Planning Commission Meeting November 10 , 1976 Page Five IT WAS THEN ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE ORIGINAL MOTION BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE THAT THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE REPORT BACK CONCERNING THE STQNEWAY CONCRETE REZONE APPLICATION ON JANUARY 12, 1977. MOTION CARRIED. On the original motion to continue the public hearing and refer the matter to the Special Studies Committee for study , MOTION CARRIED. The audience was advised that those interested in attending committee meetings should either leave their names , addresses , and telephone numbers with the Recording Secretary or contact the Planning Department, and they would be notified . REZONE: B. ALBERT HEGLUND , JR. ; Appl . No. R-892-76 ; rezone from R- 1 to B-P ; property located at 437 South Whitworth Avenue . The item was opened for' consideration , and staff review was requested by the Vice-chairman . The Planning Director noted previous consideration of the area in connection with the applicant ' s substation rehabili - tation project to provide additional parking . Mr. Ericksen discussed the character of the area ; plans for removal of an existing house on the property ; site dimensions and proximity to the commercial development ; and the existence of restrictive covenants relating to setbacks , landscaping , and site development of the original site . He noted the applicant ' s agreement that the restrictive covenants be extended to the subject site . Slides , maps , and aerial photographs depicting the proposal were viewed and described . It was noted that access is pro- posed from Shattuck Avenue only. The Vice-chairman invited comment from the applicant. Albert Heglund , Jr. , 3202 38th Ave. W. , Seattle , noted that the proposed parking would provide up to one hundred off- street parking stalls , which are more than required by City ordinance , and will eliminate employee parking on Whitworth Avenue and access to the railroad and produce a better flow of parking . He described proposed retention of trees , park- ing lay-out , internal circulation , fencing , and screening . He noted plans for development of a street-end park on Whit- worth Ave. So: in conjunction with the total development. Mr. Heglund then responded to questions from the Commission regarding relocation plans for the house. Discussion among the Commissioners ensued relating to permitted uses in a B-P zone. Comments in favor of the proposal were requested by Vice- chairman Walker, but none were offered . She then called for comments in opposition to the proposal . Harry Larsen , 419 Whitworth Ave . So . , noted that he was seek- ing more information regarding the proposal and inquired concerning provisions for prevention of access to Whitworth and policing of the area at night . He noted concern regard- ing the disruption of a quiet neighborhood due to increased traffic on Shattuck. Renton Planning Commission Meeting November 10, 1976 Page Six The Planning Director advised regarding restrictive covenants providing for limitation of access to Shattuck , plans for fenc- ing , landscaping , and probable lighting of the area . Mr . Erick- sen noted a proposal regarding the Shattuck underpass that will probably also increase the traffic on Shattuck . Mr. Heglund then responded to Mr. Larsen ' s -concerns regarding protection of the neighborhood , noting that it is his opinion that the park will be a deterrent to additional traffic on Whitworth , plans for high fencing around the parking lot , and provisions for adequate lighting . He also indicated that he had received the support of contiguous property owners and renters . The Planning Director noted further review by the Planning. Com- mission and the Planning and Public Works Departments when plans are submitted. Further audience comment was invited. Noting none , IT WAS MOVED BY GIST, SECONDED BY WIK, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED. Following a brief discussion , the following action was taken : ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED REZONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL, . AS IT AGREES WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADJACENT USES IN THE AREA , SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT' S FILING RESTRICTIVE COVE- NANTS TO RUN WITH THE LAND AS LONG AS IT IS USED COMMERCIALLY PERTAINING TO THE FOLLOWING:. 1 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL OF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN ESTABLISHING A MINIMUM 5 ' LANDSCAPE STRIP AND FENCE ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE AND A MINIMUM 10 ' BERMED LANDSCAPE STRIP AND FENCE ALONG WHITWORTH AVE. SO. 2. PROVISION FOR ADEQUATE INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING TO THE PROPOSED PARKING AREA . 3. PERMITTED ACCESS FROM SHATTUCK AVE. SO. ONLY. 4. PROHIBITION OF OUTDOOR STORAGE ON THE SITE. .MOTION CARRIED. A recess was declared at 9 : 58 p . m. The meeting was resumed at 10 : 11 p . m. with all members noted above present. REZONE: . F. BARTOW FITE ; Appl . R-893-76 ; rezone from G to M-P ; property located on West Valley Highway approx . 450 ' north of S . W. 43rd St. Staff review of the subject application was requested by the Vice- chairman . The Planning Director described the property location , size , sig- nificant development in the area , Comprehensive Plan designation , and character of the site . He noted that there are no develop- ment plans at present. It was decided not to view slides of the area . Comments from the applicant were invited by the Vice-chairman . Bartow Fite , 5010 - 92nd S . E . , Mercer Island , noted that adja- cent property to the north is zoned M-P ; the Comprehensive Plan oj1f TOr�ec ,zy Renton Planning Commission Meeting November 10, 1976 Page Nine disrupt, that installation of sidewalks could possibly affect the grade of Meadow, and that he is willing to file restrictive covenants agreeing to participation for a future L . I . D. should a waiver be granted. As there were no questions of the applicant , the Vice-chairman invited comments in favor of the application from the audience. None were offered. She then called for comments in opposition . Jerry Davis , 2407 Meadow Ave . No . , inquired regarding the spe- cifics of the application . Mr. Ericksen explained the proposal , noting ordinance requirements and willingness of the applicant to agree to covenants requiring participation in an L . I . D. at a later date. Mr. Davis then indicated that he was not opposed to the request. Discussion followed regarding the lack of off-site improvements and a street elevation system for the area , and IT WAS MOVED BY TEEGARDEN , SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED. The following action ensued : ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE COMMISSION APPROVE AN INDEFINITE DEFERRAL OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS SUBJECT TO TIE FILING OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS REQUIRING PARTICIPATION IN A FUTURE L. I. D. INITIATED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR CITY INITIATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS. There was further discussion regarding the character of the area and justification for the request . On the question , MOTION CARRIED, Gist dissenting. 6- ADMINISTRATIVE: A. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 . LAND USE` COMMITTEE Chairman Teegarden advised that the committee had met on November 3rd with the Kennydale community representa- tives regarding the Comprehensive Plan in the No . 30th' and Park Ave. No . area , and a written report to the Commission will be forthcoming shortly . Commissioner Teegarden advised that a memorandum is being sent to the Special Studies Committee relative to the Glen ' Norwood rezone request in the area advising them of the Kennydale residents position on the matter. • The next meeting of the Land Use Committee is scheduled for November 17 , 1976 , to consider the Comprehensive Plan in the Ripley Lane Planning Area . 2. SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE Chairman Wik called a meeting for November 18 , 1976 , at 7 : 30 p. m. to consider the Stoneway Concrete Company rezone request. B. OTHER 1 . MEETING WITH CITY OF TACOMA OFFICIALS Vice-chairman Walker reported to the Commission regard- ing the meeting with the Tacoma Planning Commission , Hearings Examiner, and Planning Department representa- tives on November 4th . She noted that she had written Renton Planning Commission Meeting November 10 , 1976 Page Ten a report concerning the implementation of the system, current composition and role of the Planning Commission , relationship and liaison with the Hearings Examiner and Council , formulation of goals and policies , and areas of review. It was decided that a thank you letter should be written to the Tacoma representatives from the Acting Chairman. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION - COUNCIL LIAISON Vice-chairman Walker indicated that it had been sug- gested that either the Planning Commission or a com- mittee from the Planning Commission meet with the Planning and Development Committee in view of estab- lishing a liaison between the two groups . All Commissioners indicated an interest in meeting with the Council committee . It was requested that the Planning Director indicate that some of the members could meet on November 17th at 4 : 30 p . m. • 3. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN Copies of the Community Development Plan and Housings, Assistance Plan were distributed for Planning Commis- sion information . As there was no further business before the Commission , IT WAS MOVED BY GIST, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN , THAT. THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting was adjourned at 11 : 30 p. m. yam. ry " Sandra' Gist , Secretary Joan Walker, Vice-chairman • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON NOVEMBER 10 , 19 76 , AT 8 : 00 P . M . TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . VARIANCE FROM THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ; file No . V-880-76 ; property located in the vicinity of 2700 Mountain View Ave . No . 2 . REZONE FROM G TO B- 1 ; file No .' R-889-76 ; property located at the southwest corner of Sunset Highway and 138th Ave . S . E . - 3 . REZONE FROM R- 1 AND S- 1 TO R-1 , R-2 , R-3 AND R-4 ; file No . R-891-76 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple V alley Highway ) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-Way . 4 . REZONE FROM R-1 TO B-P ; file No . R-892-76 ; property located at 437 South Whitworth Ave . 5 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-893-76 ; property located on West Valley Highway approx . 450 ' north of S . W . 43rd St . ' 6 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-894-76 ; property located on Lind Ave . S . W. and S . W . 10th St . within Earlington Industrial Park . 7 . SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN AN M-P ZONE ; file No . SA-895-76 ; property located on Lind Ave . S . W . and S . W . 10th St . within Earlington Industrial Park . 8 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT ; file No . W-888-76 ; proper.ty located at 2415 Meadow Ave . No . Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the • Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON NOVEMBER 10 , 1976 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . SANDRA GIST , SECRETARY PUBLISHED October 31 , 1976 RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , MICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn 1 , to before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED „ on the 28thday of October 19 76 PRELIMN1Ry RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT To REVISION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 10 , 1976 APPLICANT: STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC. APPLICATION : REZONE FROM R- 1 , S- 1 , AND GS- 1 TO R- 1 , R-2 , R-3, and R-4 ; ALSO HILLSIDE AREA TO REMAIN AS GREENBELT . LOCATION : East of SR169 (Maple Valley Highway ) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of the powerline right-of-way . FINDINGS AND COMMENTS : 1 . Request is compatible with the Comprehen- sive Plan as amended on March 8 , 1972 , per Ordinance #2708 . 2 . Existing street (Blaine Ave . N . E . ) does not have the capability of handling additional traffic from such higher densities . At least two additional access roads will be necessary . 3. Proposal would establish single family residential and low density multiple residential south of Monterey Terrace with graduated increase in density east- ward away from Monterey Terrace . 4 . Other City departments had concerns regard- ing adequate access , utilities , and pro- tection of adjacent properties . 5 . Provisions for restrictive covenants may be necessary to provide binding agreement for proper access , utilities , greenbelt and open space provisions , and development by City P. U . D. Ordinance only . DECISION CONSIDERATIONS : Referral to Special Studies Committee for study and report . ' 1 ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR STONEWAY" SITE The following general descriptions should apply to the particular zoning classification established on the property described below : R- 1 ( BUFFER AREA) - PARCEL A The easterly 470 feet of the westerly 720 feet of the . northerly 100 feet of the above described property . R-2 - PARCEL B The easterly 800 feet of the westerly 1100 feet of the above described property ; except the R- 1 area (Parcel A) .and except that portion defined as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan as revised on May 1.7 , 1972 , and noted as the hillside area along the south property line and northeast of Maple Valley. Highway (SR- 169 ) . R-3 - PARCEL C The westerly 800 feet of the above described property except the southerly 1380 feet of the easterly 300 feet thereof. R-4 - PARCEL D The northerly 1100 feet of the westerly 300 feet of the above described property, except the northerly 300 . feet thereof. GREENBELT - PARCEL E That portion defined as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan as revised on May 17 , 1972 , and noted as the hillside area along the south property line and northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION. OF ENTIRE STONEWAY SITE All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M . described as follows : Beginning at the. Southwest corner of the Southeast . one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said .subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of_ Section 17; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No. 5 (St. S. R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653. 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89 °45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . • \ 11 1 I Ill HI Ii 1011 ;,)`.�C) \ I I 4 J t.1.i,J s \ �1' • I O. ,,, 0Il, ill/ 1 . .' 1 '. .: ._ _'‘::• -:11.E.7.7_,).---2 .--••.1..'...i' l'I'5;..--7::..:e7.47i * 1,1 A •IJere: N G. WI(ITE I ;7./ I . - If 'I ih9 1 - 'n"' / 1.68 i i.dd A' A� 1.30 r3' IY/©!yr l T•I.//5 't 1 I I.t./;'!r2 sr; d, 1r6 I(}`� 0 ��°' ' +' •�":� 41 �501 ii3.iAi I. MT. UE.IVI 1 LE W_ IEH. Y 15(1� U�"' I I®; ''a , `� �' r - .-,/P•� 844AC. • ll• 17� •F, /$ 1 5�\ 151 w O 3r,Ac. I.��I • ISO 141 11J• ��� 5; � - - r::.i�9 `• ' , J--7� 11 Ib 1 141 14.1 11 IZI 11 "i.fir; 35 c.tn 1 J I� 1t5�'': 141.1 i^� •Z jn?;f ! .,._._ h.3sI 3 r ^ 466 i:�'��.la • In? 15 1 • 13 13 .- 11 ' ' I( T , {r, CYI ��_ j -.. 3 09 ; Q I CV. 1 - p Il ' 10614 5 1 1 Cr 1iei3 12 1. . .. _ IO II .1 011 1. r17 IQI01 13 r 1.3 • il2 II .._ J- , 12 �s �� 1, 30r..c. -- t - 5 P,9 ' — �: ,,T �LIVET_ CEMcTERY 4�� / /.i.:' 9 87 -tjj FA2 _I IT , 10 --r c� I t z "� i - ---- ;� �3A: -- ,li__=- Z• n ten z I I 8 lr' �2 11 r.`II. Cr r I IOj.9 I. ji; :�_.�i ' 1 1 i f - ?! { V �' ° '� ! I I 111 ZI:I E J �o (L � ' R co MT OLIVET i 11 _ , 1 a, i • (117., '�, �� �! ^+,()I, <<` •15' ,;'' CEMETERY ___ I/ 6 4,148, /.z.3 � ) Z ,T` 3,....4.- - • —i I u r,• \,J�FJ i It •,� 1 / r I 2 I,}AC • T Y A 7 „.,,. 4:4. --'-'11.'.1' ,S•19 1 w tricit‘.. , `44-'"• - ...-11 (-- ' ' - ' 'i ,-;/ ••••- /)•• ,-- , -...,N, - , . 3.`[3 �•C. i I . i I !L,„,‘, irrite )„.. : . . . . , ,.../ .„,„\,. ,,, .,:, Phitegto 10\--.„„ I '17AKE.L._ _Cii::::::-.-,---",,,A.,) A c re 3 1 5,4,..t a i ,--- .,,, , ,,,,,,,, „.., . , ...., 5 ,,, , 0,_,,, , - . 11,... ;T,,,‘,, '1 I ./.. e j'''' r\ 1 N. I 1 ' i I s I .`' tiops dia :•1 • \\/6\\ . ' I .:_._ 't.. I PACek i— ‘ I I 1:7 • ,. ..::: _ r1 `' N. 4 '`.I HII ow( r)AN(1 R. (,HAVl I CO I I D•51%)44 _ _____ 1 L,,,, '\ _______, . X\''' \'' ' , ,, -, 3/r •.,�gay \..f� r</ \\ \ _� to F: \ • \ ''•;' . .441 i., ..,„, 4 474, ., ( . „. .... . ,,,,, ,... . . )416 - �� 1. .. \ •„ I tit / �'\� • # 4 l / 11` t`, / \ \ 4iti • / -3.i:1:-'''''''1, 'V e.7--\ '''.,, 'N.,„'.."..1,1'S,,-.N., .• \\ ..,.. .. \\‘' ',. \ \ \> \� r :41:.. 4201) ..'',...k.N I 1 . ''''..T., xC' ��� { n \✓^, C:4\-:.. , IAME \.\4'r , 11 mod^ , i , \y� t,t, . I "yam �� ' -- \\` I, /// �^ /,/ '\'•a t..�,A. ...'C\•� . .. ..__.._ �1 \ 1 r7-j -- •—::•-/ „ � 9 p \ i s✓srn' ! .`'\. \,h. 4 4ii -" -,„.,, .• \\\‘',, k i\k/3,1 il•i ••••••/.,•. ' 0 7,, •c. t lc.; I ; c, • ''......, '''..,, , % \,_,.,-."_,j ::„ 5 . ' ;• /(10. i '. ''.,.. �` i:vx''�� \IN 13,03f/lc. •;- I 111711.1,°' ,,. , ''. % \ /,p 1 ,___ i .,,. 7 4,:. , .':-:-...'. / .- --— ' '1,xN".. y 1LN (J l . '�:`"' \ d" i a '' \ Qj I l cPfo��s• {I r :.tf,.ax.,..:.,,..',h;:atiz.a.'GP:1.ti3dl,'��^ire`'+/iaQi. Eel!5:\.:ii.....i+:Y,:?•'L!.A...r'by"ra.l�'Ai'>,-w11Nkt ..L:F.°,1-fi,i...arivt.,iJ:;nini.,::iC...d:�33m.,..ru,,.�^.\.n::tiSa,.'E:.4au.hti:.F*}.H:.+:F.J.+:S;�1tRY C'n'M...z, 1w�t`B�•:Lt�.l�d_L..�_, _�-..�;i9s.,,.1v.P:ri+::,:s��._l�:'c,r+...H,_ ..rr:.-._.. ..l ..:A -- - - • s .;,Ina,�l / • :Ya \�� /'''°�'I i + I I 0, t;:::...,><_, rc 4..}, ~i 19/Q i 1. z 7 re`\\ �o �o ° w z . ` + / S.w-.--' .• , * � e\Y i.. III ��� ' 10 , , :�< [p� i YINI it \ \ \ i'''''''''''' '.------- Gil Et' , ,i.,-f-,.• - ,•. /41 ,,,z 4 ie ray\ \ i' t�' " g‹. "It /f,,,/ i i i a 9I . , \ ..._, ,,„, ; 1 ,ki i . �` i x r'_ \\ .\ /\ /' `*vms� $ ' 0 I/ram/// lk,./ '` - 1444,7 elm si STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . I% � . r®�� •l+� A �' 11 REZONE 1, fa;. maim la MrOUVET 1 11 g. ;N lnalVII la i CEMETERY '1 I. 1 N,�w r 1 1 ' X. 1 ' / RENTON CITY LIMITS• • _1 11 I I / 1 I I // ' �a '�* I I { 1 P; 1 I I ,I Ili L I I I t m \c s _P a �' --�-- --4 -- p - e t i ck ,,,, 4 { ,, 11 111 I .�4"gtUMIIMMIMIE# q s e z 9 9 �� '� i- a .ANe ,.« III (I � �,:.��///,''' i \� j • I REZONE : 1 I STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC. ; Appl . No . R-891-76 ; rezone from R- 1 and S- 1 to I 1 R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple . Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery and west of 1 1 Bonneville Power Right-of-way . 5 1 .,. .2,,., _ ., ..., _ _....._ . _..... _._._ �. ±43 . 1 acres with APPLICANT STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC . TOTAL AREA 24.0 buildable area PRINCIPAL ACCESS East side of Mt. Olivet Cemetary . i . s 1 EXI5-ZING ZONING R- 1 , S- 1 and GS- 1 t i EXISTING USE Abandoned gravel pit . 1 Rezone to Higher Density from R-1 through •R-4 for " PROPOSED USE future residential development. - - - `; Single family, low density, medium density i COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN and high density multi-family; greenbelt E along steep hillside above Maple Valley Highway. COMMENTS i i z s I „ 7d/I a r,11 ', -- \t Affidavit of Publication il (/ STATE OF WASHINGTON �`f” COUNTY OF KING ss. `,f l r y i being first duly sworn on NOTICE OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS oath,deposes and says that` is the Chi e f e lerk of PUBLIC HEARING FOR A TWO LOT SHORT RENTON PLANNING PLAT; file No. W-888-76; THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) COMMISSION property located at 24:15 times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and RENTON,WASHINGTON Meadow Ave. No. has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred A PUBLIC HEARING Legal descriptions of all to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- WILL BE HELD BY THE applications noted above on paper published four (4) times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, RENTON PLANNING COM- file in the Renton Planning and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained MISSION AT ITS REGU- Department. at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton LAR MEETING IN THE ALL INTERESTED Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the COUNCIL CHAMBERS, PERSONS TO S A I D Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, CITY HALL, RENTON, PETITIONS ARE INVITED WASHINGTON, ON TO BE PRESENT AT THE Washington.That the annexed is a O t i C e of Public NOVEMBER 10, 1976, AT PLANNING COMMISSION 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER MEETING ON NOVEMBER THE FOLLOWING 10, 1976 AT 8:00 P.M. TO Heerim- Pl" linConiission - Petitins PETITIONS: EXPRESS THEIR 1. VARIANCE FROM OPINIONS. THE SHORELINE MASTER Sandra Gist, as it was published in regular issues(and PROGRAM R E - Secretary not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period QUIREMENTS; file No. V- Renton Planning 880-76; property located in Commission the vicinity of 2700 Mountain Published in the Renton One View Ave. No. Record-Chronicle October of consecutive issues,commencing on the 2. REZONE FROM R-1 31, 1976. R4026 • AND S-1 TO R-1, R-2, R-3 -- 31 day of October 19 76 and endingANDR4;fileNo.R891-76; the' property located east of SR- 169(Maple Valley Highway) _ . south of Monterey Terrace • day of ,19 both dates and Mt.Olivet Cemetery and inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- west of Bonneville Power scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Right-of-Way. 3. REZONE FROM R-1 TO B-P; file No. R-892-76; charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.�.a.!.3,Gwhich property located at 437 . has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the • South Whitworth Ave. first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent 4.REZONE FROM G TO insertion. M-P; file No. R-893-76; e` property located on West 6 i�•G-ci_,<_cL-G/-C'. 17 tZ a ._cci___ Valley Highway approx.450' north of S.W.43rd St. f CC ,f 5.REZONE FROM GTO ' chief clerk M-P; file No. R-894-76; property located on Lind Ave.S.W.and S.W.10th St. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31 day of within Earlington Industrial Park. C tp cer 19 7b 6. SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE/WARE • 1 HOUSE A P NE Ni-tl_L's,: Is .ti ,1..,iit file No.SA-895 INAN 76;M property located on Lind Ave. S.W. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, and S.W. 10th St. within ' residing at Kent, King County. Earlington Industrial Park. 7. WAIVER OF OFF- - Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955 —Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. PULLICN • TIC .J. . . .PUBLIC HEARING • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION • A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 10, 1976 - 3:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM DESCRIBED BELOW: REZONE : STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC. ; Appl • No . R-891-76 ; rezone from R-1 and S- 1 to R- 1 , R-2 , R-3, and R-4 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-.way. p., ,,,,:. ‘ // , _ ___:::____::::\__,..::::,...::::,_2: _ ,k-G - it -- dp ,�W Z GS \�, \ / ! i -0z E L: _ I• STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . � I a.�Q� narouvET \14- - , I REZONE ) ,.cua a-spir Ik j).....i.I •,• .4 ail" , II _ —�.iis‘,4 ,:r 4 + ' RENTON CITY LIMITS- s 1 I I � I /Q / • �i I 1 `tea _ w'ST'-r--s p — G 4= '" --, , % I, li A ---r—"4""Pk.--. _. I -ems , THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT COMMENTS IN WRITING. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT: CITY OF RENTON. - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550 MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. RENTON, WA. 98055 EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL "A" The west 850. 32 feet of the north 100 feet , (the west 850. 32 feet being measured along the North line , and the north 100 feet being measured at right angles to the North line ) of the following described main tract : MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the -true point of beginning . Except any portion of said Parcel "A" lying within the Green- belt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" . PARCEL " B" The west 1180. 32 feet , as measured along the North line , of the following described main tract : MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St . S . R . #169) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South .89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . Except any portion of said Parcel " B" lying within the north 100 feet of the west 850. 32 feet , as measured at right angles to and along the North line thereof. This exception also known as Parcel "A" . ALSO except any portion of said Parcel " B" lying within the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" PARCEL " C" The east 799 feet as measured along the North line of the following described main tract : • MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of - Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R. #169) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . Except any portion of said Parcel " C" lying within the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel E ALSO except the area known as Parcel " D" and more partic- ularly described as follows : Beginning at the Northeast corner of the above described main tract : Thence southerly along the easterly line thereof a distance of 300 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence westerly parallel with the North line of the main tract herein described a distance of 300 feet to an intersection with a line which is parallel with. and 300 feet westerly of , as measured at right angles to , the east line of said main tract ; thence southerly along said parallel line to an intersection with the northeasterly line of the Green- belt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known •ias Parcel " E" ; thence southeasterly along the northerly line of said Greenbelt area to an intersection with the East line of said main tract ; thence northerly along the East line thereof a distance of 800 feet more or less to the point of beginning . -2- PARCEL " D" Beginning at the NE corner of the MAIN TRACT as described below : Thence southerly along the easterly line thereof a distance of 300 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence westerly parallel with the North line of the main tract herein des- cribed a distance of 300 feet to an intersection with a line which is parallel with and 300 feet westerly of , as measured at right angles to , the East line of said main tract ; thence southerly along said parallel line to an intersection with the northeasterly line of the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" ; thence southeasterly along the northerly line of the Greenbelt area to an intersection with the East line of said main tract ; thence northerly along the East line thereof a distance of 800 feet more or less to the point of beginning . MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M. described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of, said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . PARCEL " E" All that portion of the following described main tract designated as a Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 . MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 3 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of saidlsubdiviision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St . S . R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in -3- a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . -4- .\ • i� • 111( II ILI n1I LILL I , O,,, a- / 3RO _ _.--._.------- -•- 1v�/ � d .., 0.9:AG, \• 10„1 I \' a /�2 +� ••�Co II ti, , ;I �! :::,.:::.,,,,,i,MOvU ® 7 .a4`r• 60 Ac, q ,.70nr ' i,3. NTEpC .,.,::�'. 1 • 15� Ir6 16`.Y d•a 'i` •� �/ — 0.32 Ac• 5 �_'1E1 I5J` o '* ,.O •-`,' __-� MT.OLIVl1 GE ALIERY _ xe.r.2 } c 9 ▪_PO.J._ O44 AG. •Ir !I017 -41 (LJ t15'. „ -mi 035Ac. r,c.r29• F. ,12!. m 1211., • ii I112 1EE- `� ,...i 3,__� ,. , , I - 4:11 0 • '106 5 I 1 Q •;M 12 j oY- f . �' I 1 cc 1 I+ 13 b 123• itII -- ti Co,,DAc. _ w . � .MT, OLIVET CEMZTRY_Qoo ,.,7z 9 Ep W tti 11O. CC to_ - co • 9I W pi ,- ¢I 4 -ct .9 'bd"_'7. `k.z'It' •• a I 1 I 11,; F 56ri { ;f'io�'' a m MT OLIVET I,1, _%'1 ���5�,. �,,`J-., "•, �, I06 1.4,• `'1. CEMETERYI. _ n r.4,us,rag 8 '0. ,.. it • • V'...........:I , , - ,Lr�fr` -.. \•: �, r1r 3.95Ac. 2.IJAL i .\ 1� .,�c���r;L� O'I�,-I f:{ P f 7/'\5 1 r-'/..45 • /010.. 1 6 4� 3 2 O /; �A $1? to.. / ` YYY . • •\• `` va (C L / • • r :;Ir,{i ,I•• SA.. R 1.12AV.1. L. 2 11 , -y ' zr 5, 1 / u':, it II U / ';/., - .5,•(-,. e)4 Root . . , , R,..z._ , .. .._______.. .. , ,...... . \s/c. c \ , T 1 •_ . COL JAcres c,ai'.' i4 . . ,,,,,, o6., ,s,,.„ i ,.1 t 1.54c., . , ,,,,TR..4 . c-s ; ‘ , .-. K,, ,c,,,\ . • _ _ .._ ......, . , 4 . 6..,,, . i 44 _ nze 1 r • ' A \< \ 510 LWAY SAND E. GRAVEL L0 ++ • \ !illikile\ 1 0 �\ r GU.r 6. a ,\\U. \ 1 `\ INICRPACE CORP \ j• ` • `" pi., , F.▪ t a\ ;( •\�q e 1�,1 ',.. 'I.('.c, . .-...2.......,... i; Gov't.. L.ot - P,. ,e, ''. < I,,' \ 2�N, , -- .11 Are •,. q\ ,<M cF sHANE \�,Q \ • \'\ 4 '--- / 1 I `may ���\ •' '� \fix` F `r \\\`\ \(sat ,+ Ldi y 1,�/1:it+ \��/ \ .. yn 1J,03Ac, \' IIti \ r I r�, e _r zr '1u11� !� 1 /Id .o�. y+ 1p 9n' \ ; / iQ'lam,\ RTa;Fhr�r I ,,,ea ' ,d '' -1I r ,I A-. T. ri.;l • Public Notices Public Notices NOTICE OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC HEARING FOR A TWO LOT SHORT RENTON PLANNING PLAT; file No. W-888-76; • COMMISSION property located at 2415 RENTON,WASHINGTON Meadow Ave. No. A PUBLIC HEARING Legal descriptions,•of all WILL BE HELD BY THE applications noted above on RENTON PLANNING COM- file in the Renton Planning MISSION AT ITS REGU- Department. LAR. MEETING IN THE ALL INTERESTED COUNCIL CHAMBERS, PERSONS TO SAI D CITY HALL, RENTON,., PETITIONS ARE INVITED WASHING T'ON, ON - TO BE PRESNT.AT THE NOVEMBER 10, 1976, AT PLANNING COMMISSION 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER MEETING ON NOVEMBER THE FOLLOWING .10, 1976. AT8:00P.M. TO: PETITIONS: EXPRESS THEIR 1. VARIANCE FROM OPINIONS. THE SHORELINE MASTER • . Sandra Gist, PROGRAM RE - - Secretary QUIREMENTS; file No. V- Renton Planning 880-76; property located in Commission the vicinity of 2700 Mountain Published in the Renton View Ave. No. Record-Chronicle October 2. REZONE FROM R-1 31, 1976. R4026 AND S-1 TO R-1, R-2, R-3 AND R-4;file No.R-891-76; property located east of SR- 169(Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt.Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-Way. 3. REZONE FROM R-1 TO B-P; file No. R-892-76; property located at 437 South Whitworth Ave. 4.REZONE FROM G TO M-P; file No. R-893-76; property located on West Valley Highway approx.450' north of.S.W.43rd.St. 5.REZONE FROM G TO M-P; file No. R-894-76; property located on Lind Ave.S.W.and S.W.10th St. within Earlington Industrial Park. 6. SITE APPROVAL FOR. OFFICE/WARE- HOUSE IN AN AM-P ZONE; file No.SA-895-76;property located on Lind Ave. S.W. and'S.W. 10th St. within Earlington Industrial Park. 7. WAIVER OF OFF- / . 1 ROUTE SCHEDULE . PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED / Dp1�/7� PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: C� l EZONE S11A-"4/ CpitiC"tia (4-9c- MAJOR PLAT. SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE /c/-6/7i SIGNATURE OR INITAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE U I L D LNi? X i()-----2--0- -) (--._N (�.%.1. 7 TRAFFIC ENG X /d -2G ---7- ENGINEERING G-Az.--/ /o -0-0-7-6 FIRE z/i1/ /D4G/7( HEALTH REVIEWERR '' S COMMENTS OR APPR VAL CONDITIONS : - (---V-14-cda0 ,, p ) ' acc ._S Airr ���//� ���, .�/ ���/� i / / _ K (A-,1,-1-,,_ �. ' l,Pi_ /� 1^ 41.**A. //� Vr/ fSSP_ c" ~ �..y-- S l-�%��u � 'y � �/�'�'c�!1 Y-E G V�`C-� �r� �^*c�ci;N�a 79 ys s. J-'r4;�= i% f y/ �y _ ;7're/` //r �r-1G7a�" 7✓t=�/ l7(�'f.',c., - is /:.` J& ;'LJ.'— ,e:2« //! i / f CliC/-L �P C_cc-/-vy ./CG�,�r.�,fS p PLEASE SIGN THE E . I .W . : r, e ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : 4 Finance Department 04 Fire Department • Library Department 40 Park Department r • Police Department 0 Public Works Department Building Div . 0Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . 0 Utilities Engineering Div. FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) SUBJECT.: Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : 5'1o1,Je wi. Cjp,-,0e4e Tim (kS C:. Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : . Department : 2Zb (--, Comments : /� Lei emu- (,� -POL-&- ______ ___7; _ti id_tts___ f 1'b C)7,L�. C c (-,eil_J _G -, ,F,,,,,,,,c /44,,,,,_-- 0111F /d - 61-7-‘ Signature of Dir- .+ r or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 25"4. !°c ire���.�. to Comments : 2 e �.ri,i,/s- -.,6.yri. 4d �o�'n 4n-Ca s// �e�-; ° by cliff �.sr/ds edd /c?9 a,/�C.�,�-�✓�o:y . -S"L /71Gu/ X,..;cie• eV s` .,,..,4--7;.,,,r^G�•e " -,.0.r c_." G[,,c,r,• e., S u�s.- ,...4,id.-ram S?,--PA_ Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 (OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY 1.,c. PARTMENTS : Department : V4-, 1 C.s Comments : mivc, � e_ dzi-uak/v /SSess Sc.„lOar y /1/1 cr Gc t1 W /4 c< ;ws Ara ram, gs a,./' Afg: 3 `44t Sf- Sfk So G'W u 4L I{/CGJ F"krevhita S ^ sat., C,3 14-7.- "-47:3!/5 . a. 2 J/(O/ ,_ Signature of Director or„Author ' zed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : a t 4:i/•-7 Comments : re Cx'` 4) z.rci-712 e / 4-5 e ?,4) „ /Z=R.C4' 7/1 /C-Ic)/2'4)--yi- - 42- (_-_,// _} Signature of Director or -Authorized Rep r entative D e— REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : � Department : � 6-7 Commen is . we) g6 S i //74G /9'/e( , /���G'� Amy. /tx/XJ /f vore, /i?)S 75 13L /QiS`�L S. O, �S'�'�`/�,o 1t 5 %",�//> /%/ a/ea /`J, Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : r.p),P • Comments : „_ , CC"' pA,V7(„ Sign , ure of Direc or or uthorized Representative Date Fi 47, CITY OF RENTON) WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application N o. J°;- /j/ Environmental Checklist No. .CeFiPa' PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: "-.' Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance ElDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions, now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in- the future. . NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. of.h.. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Stoneway Concrete, TAc. 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: P. 0. Box 509 Renton, WA. 98055 226-1000 3. Date Checklist submitted 10-11-76 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Renton Highlands 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : • Rezone of property approved for comprehensive land use plan under Ordinance No. 2708 on May 8, 1972 with declaration of Restrictive Covenants. Zoning of area request is for partial R-1, R-2, R-3 and R k and open space as depicted on "Stoneway Exhibit A" dated March 8, 1972. � � v -2- 7. ,Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Located east of SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway), south of. Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery, west of Bonneville Power right of way. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Unknown - rezone only 9: List of all permits, licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: • • No • 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain: Yes. If rezoned and sold, to be used for multiple housing per restrictive covenants. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Attached - Comprehensive Land Use approval.. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS • (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES RATITE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES ' MAYB.E NO • (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES MAYBE NT (d) The destruction; covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES RPTE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or • changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YE-S-- MATTE Explanation: 0 -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X V MAYBE NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? Y! RATE- (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of water movements , in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Changes in absorption rates , drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? y YES MA BE N O • Explanation: (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? YES MAYBE (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique , rare or endangered species of flora? DES- MAYBE NO (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? y YES- MAYBE N�D (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X VET— M YBE NO Explanation: -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds , land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES M YBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO .,,Lc,).. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? _IL YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? v YET- MAYBE NO- Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? __I ._. YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) _Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? $ YEB MAYBE WO— Explanation: (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: S-1 to R-2, R-3, R-4 zoning • (9) Natural Resources. Wilt the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x YES MA BE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • ( 10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides ; chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES MAYBE NB Explanation: Rezoned for higher density population -5- (12) Housing. X Will the proposal affect existing housing, or 'create a demand for additional housing? YX-- MAYBE NU X• Explanation: .11 C � .omIS n3eviq t'h ± ±1 cthr ofr n.eri biii J - (13) Transportation/Circulation. . Will the proposal result in : (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? _X_ YES MAYBE NO (b) .Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand T V -new parking? _ ^A"� • YES MAYBE ND (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X - YET— MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or 'goods? X YEY— MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles , bicyclists or pedestrians? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: Higher dwnathy thrp pow zoned • • (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : X (a) Fire protection? YES MATBE NO (b) Police protection? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? g YES MAYBE NO • • (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? X YES ATM' A (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? y YES MAT BE NO Explanation: Higher density than now a.onprl (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? YES MAYBE NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? YES MAYBE 61 7e0$9l d^i9gol; Explanation: (16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? X YEE— MAYBE NO (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X _ YES MAYBE NO 0 + • -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? % YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? 7gC YE3 MAYBE NO Explanation: Land has no utilities at present titre. (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of - . any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? X YES MAYBE NO • Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? % YES MAYBE NO Explanation; (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure , object or building? YES MAYBE t Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: (signed) - - a Rob der (name: pr ,,•,�� • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 • z r.. LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Northerly 100 feet, measured perpendicularly to the Northerly line of those portions of the following described properties lying Westerly of a line drawn Southerly, perpendicularly to said Northerly line, from the most Easterly corner of Lot 17, Block 4, Monterey Terrace Addition, according to the plat recorded in Volume 50 of Plats, page 36, records of King County, Washington: said properties being described as follows: Parcel A: (Tax Lot 3) All that portion of the Southwest one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M., lying East of State Road No. 5 (Maple Valley Highway) (SR 169) and South of a line beginning at the East one-quarter corner of said Section; thence West 1,325.85 feet from said East one-quarter corner; thence North 1°00'00" East a distance of 252.22 feet to the true point of beginning of said line; thence West 653.91 feet to said State Road No. 5, and Parcel B: (Tax Lot 109) Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M.; thence North along West line of said subdivision a distance of 252.23 feet; thence East 526.41 feet; thence South 88°00'00" East a distance of 799 feet to the East line of said Section 17; thence South along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of said section 17; thence West along the South line of said Northeast one-quarter to the point of beginning. -- ,-A---1-., • /07 /1 /4, -e-- aC'- " ee- 6 0-c- i 0 0 4 5 Pfr°44-9-1 1-4-7-) G 1 4PleD -'6 l / 19 i 04-#. .,L..--( i t 7co 0 - r,co D 1 leeilite - 4./7/" '6 e' '' -e 4.10-1.4......-...., if Plt-e-74-t-e-; y / -- ----- , 4.v$ ed0' 4:14"-e 49 - • . / - EI\IE CITY OF RENTON tit . REZONE APPL CATION OCT 19767. For Office Use Only: Nj �.,‹ • NG DEp P APPL. NO. /- JY"" 7e PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 4 - Avae-0( $50 FEE; RECEIPT NO. yj,c' APPEAL FILED FILING DATE /0 -i/ - 7Z CITY COUNCIL ACTION A17•-6/e a/ HEARING DATE / - �a - �e ORDINANCE NO. & DATE , &//3 • APPLICANT TO COMPLETE . ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : 1. Name Stoneway Concrete,' Inc. . . phone 226-1000 • 2. Address P. 0. Box 509, Renton, WA. 98055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Gov't Lot 8 • • between Monterey Terrace and SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway) 4. Square footage or acreage of property. approximately 24 acres 5. Legal' description of property Cif. more space is required, attach separate sheet) See Attached •• . • • � I 6. Existing zoning •R-1 and S-1 -65-1 ,Zoning Regt}ested R-1, R-2 R-3. NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considers in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. 'Varied density housing from R-1 thru;:R-4 as proposed by City of Renton Ordinance No. 2708 with attached declaration of Restrictive • Covenants. • • 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. ' 1. As proposed by Restrictive covenants 2. Access from NE 3rd St. from East side 'of Mt. Olivet Cemetery 3_ Greenbelt of Hillside along SR-169 • 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the ... site? One - two years • • 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Planning Dept. 2-73 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Govern- ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East, W. M. described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-qualrter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252. 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line • of Section 17 ; thence south along. said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No. 5 (St. S. R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; th.ence South 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653. 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . . . _ �� _ ' - =ies0 -� '•-\K ; 1 it _ri 1- '' :O(ATIONAL i I} ' e . T , I6�L~ REtTON I I11 1 I' ;ir "‘, :::,- , --i 1 - 11 '9 . MI r- ' 1 ,.G FJ\4VVLCID i IF • • . • . .,„;.)„.1;)Tid. ..r,i. ....j rt. ,':,/i,.p.1-144,;,,fr.. . _ s '11,444"p-.-.„-.411,1.1i;?, e'/.0),, ,-.V./.. . —v.... --';'.. • { •• N �: � �` '7JJ, )V�� r 'I' •Uf1T '•l' r!r �+ I • // ri :006-7 ' L 1 1 . .. . ,I. 4p, ., , .. ,.. . .,•-e.. „1., ./ ?so , . ,t.i"O.yl ,i) ii .,, ,..,, , ... . , . . \\. -n,). .,... .,,a:c:c- . 0-„. ,,-,f.t, ,-----414 ( 0. - —. - 7 . ' JP Mr. `0 ' ',/� AA' ,`r ' + lr'/• 11 11111111111111111 • � , � S4' I,� � � _ f .�. �. . �r,; '.‘_°,!`i ''.,1 /24(.' „. . ,e• i. •.•• -:••.:--,-----...- , :4? .• /4, 3,. -. . .'4' �\ �. ``'tj� iiiiiis...,...,,t....),,:', t„tit / a" roY. IT�. ? �T4.;, / it t1 �i ?ter s r.. tea_ P illi:51z /1 I .&i,-�' 1• - _ .. r, ,' ems; •. t� F- -� - -•- -,, �� -� '•.tee-•r ' i'' C}�1,� �� III . t� r - - ri�ky.•'c,,:, � s��`'a-_�t��', '�;,`Y�1`:';.C; - s` ll I' \ + •kJQ\t- '' rt , 1'� L � ..+'•\ua�.., • '- ; 0 " -0R- �xl` li, ;� t! 1,.....i., • ,S`� ;J`� . xt � . �„ �?i- 1 +; , \ .:z• .a...'_J.>' ' ' . . ,,,t_' ;1�j' r`r- T1Ct\l-\-;=\Site \': 1 : } \ 411U•1`\, , 'iiYr4• ,i,;� ly;., %fj ,:'? '\ '.:,,i4-t•,:•, , ` S .� � +/r..,tr� - `f�:f � . .1 ,k' ft � �� ., �������s� . ?�. � ;\ i `-\1C }. . i ,111 ..---• . .7: „. . ":-..' % \ --- i-• -. ..,, 474,476'e:,,u'•e 11/ApEtty 04p,,v -,.).`;‘. .1.. ,..e.t:'.,,,.:.• ,' . (1:*::t. R E\\IEll' (7)1" ,,, 1 Es 4,,,ft ft • oci. ,7 1 I `,1 , I , e t i ,gyp II 1 , ',1 � o�©� p �.« 1 • T--_ sti 4, ° • .��'I/�G Ds_ ST-(SNEWAY EXHIBIT An\\\,......„......... as revised March 8 , 1972 • PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE CITY OF RENTON' S COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN • Property Description: That general area included within the following boundaries, FAI 405 , NE 3rd and 4th streets, Union Avenue NE and SE, and the bluff line north of Maple Valley Highway. , LEGEND . ' ,Single Family Residential - Public Use or Quasi-P • Low Density Multi Family Res. i• Recreation !"flfl Medium Density Multi Family Res . . j Greenbelt . Hig-h—Density Multi Family Res. Proposed Boulevard • l ) I '' i, ORDINANCE NO. 1921 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REVOKING AND ELIMINATING PARAGRAPHS (3) (a) and (b) OF SECTION 4-725 OF TITLE IV (BUILDING REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 1628 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL O1.DINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON" • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON AS FOL7,C7 SECTION I : Existing paragraphs (3) (a) and (b) of Section 4-725 of TITLE IV (BUILDING REGULATIONS) of "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" reading as follows: (3) Any ordinance granting and providing such change in use district boundaries or reclassification of property, after petition therefore by the property owner or owne_r ereinabove provided, shall remain effective for a period of .one ( years from the effect- ive date of such ordinance, unless the property owner or any one of the owners originally petitioning, or their successors in interest , " , -131 may be, have commenced a change of use during said on.e7Malin �) year eriod. I f no change of use has been commenced within said time, the o7-dinance granting such change in use district boundaries or reclassification shall be null and void., in which case the use and classification in existence immediately prior to the filing of said petition sLall become effective again as to such property. The term "commenced a change of use" means (-I) The physical alteration reguirii!g a building permit; or (b) substantial evidence of occupancy, operation, usage or con- . duct ?b•eF e Ji on such reclassi cication . However, the ow oror owners of property so rezoned or reclassi Hed may petition the P=eeff �r� at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of said yLer period, for an extension of such time limit. Such ' petition must be submitted in w tin statingLthe specific reason or reasons for such request° The eX�t1M1�1 - may thereupon, if it specifically finds proper cause to exist, extend such period up to but not to exceed twelve (12) months , and any such extension shall be subject to final approval by the City Council. be and the same are hereby repealed and cancelled in all respects. SECTICT IT: All other parts and provisions of said Section not in- consistent with the foregoing shall remain in full force and affect.. SEC„7IC''7=:_c-:: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval . and legal publication. PASS71-1 BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of November , 1961. /s/ Helmie Nelson Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPRC•VED BY TH- r'd YCR this 21st day of November , 1951 _/sf. rank. Aliment Frank • APPROVFr AS 'i'.` L';'?:d z ORDINANCE NO. 1921 /s/ �^ r' r`' Shc-1 �-_ nn ------ ;)_' TJ1?LLCI.? I . J T,x/• r. T. L. . , . 1F_I eZ P .. _ 7,1: City Attorney { DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS WHEREAS, Stoneway Concrete Inc. , a firm incorporated in the State of Washington, are the owners of real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows : The Northerly 100 feet, measured perpendicularly to the Northerly line of those portions of the following described properties lying Westerly of a line drawn Southerly, perpendicularly to said Northerly line , from the most Easterly corner of Lot 17 , Block 4 , Monterey Terrace Addition, according to the plat recorded in Volume 50 of Plats, page 36 , records of King County, Washington: said properties being described as follows: Parcel A: (Tax Lot 3) All that portion of the • Southwest one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M. , lying East of State Road No. 5 (Maple Valley Highway) (SR169) and South of a line beginning at the East one- quarter corner of said Section; thence West 1 ,1325 . 85 f8et from said East one-quarter corner; thenceiNorth 1 00 ' 00" East a distance of 252 . 22 feet to the1true point of beginning of said line; thence West ,653 . 91 feet to said State Road No. 5 , and Parcel B: (Tax Lot 109) Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M. ; thence North along West line of said sub- division a distance of 252 . 28 feet; thence East 526 . 41 feet; thence South 88 00 ' 00" East a distance of 799 feet to the East line of said Section 17 ; thence South along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of said Section 17 ; thence West along the South line of said Northeast one-quarter to the point of beginning; WHEREAS , the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land • as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs , and assigns , as follows : NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES , • SHALL BE LOCATED OR CONSTRUCTED WITHIN ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THE H. G. WHITE MONTEREY TERRACE ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 50 OF PLATS , PAGE 36 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SUCH AREA SHALL BE MAINTAINED CONTINUOUSLY IN A NEAT AND CLEAN MANNER. IF NOT SO MAINTAINED, THE CITY OF RENTON SHALL HAVE THE OPTION TO ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH MAINTENANCE AND SHALL BILL THE PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THE COST THEREOF. IF UNPAID FOR MORE THAN SIXTY (60) DAYS , ' SUCH BILL • SHALL BECOME A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY. .•WWI. - - _.�s:�.._,� .............................�. - s..... ,.. �a.::fl a.. .. -µ.,... .". - ._". • Declaration of 1tc::;LricL1ve. CoyunaiiL:; Stoneway Concrete Inc. Page 2 • Any violation or breach of any of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. • J • • // / />�... Stoneway/Concrete Inc. , by: P. D. 1tO6ii.vtC • ' Stonewa Concrete Inc. , by: • STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING • On this day of / ,.,. 19 before me personally appeared r% 0 and; - ; �; .� , who executed the • within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act - and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. L . Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing at . , . r: 73 %," -1 7 -- h r • �� �mz o•v e - dle-g`I/_76 Renton Planning Commission Meeting November 10 , 1976 • Page Three 2. A 20 ' SETBACK FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILD- ING SIZE ON LOT "A. " 3. PROVISION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DECK WHICH EXTENDS NO MORE THAN 6 ' INTO THE SETBACK FROM THE WATER' S EDGE. APPROVAL IS FURTHER SUBJECT TO THE REPLATTING OF THE SIX LOTS INTO FOUR LOTS, CONFIGURATION OF EACH TO BE APPROXI- MATELY 62 ' IN WIDTH, AND PROVISION FOR ADEQUATE PARKING AND TURNAROUND AND ACCESS ON MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE NORTH. Commissioner Wik indicated his desire to amend the motion to include the reasons for the variance as follows : 1 . THE APPLICATION DOES APPLY TO SECTION 8. 02. 01 WITH REGARD TO EXCEPTIONAL OR EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES OR CONDITIONS WHICH APPLY TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR TO THE INTENDED USE THEREOF THAT DO NOT APPLY GENERALLY TO OTHER. PROPERTIES OR SHORELINES IN THE SAME VICINITY. 2. THE APPLICATION DOES APPLY TO SECTION 8 . 02. 03, WHICH STATES THE VARIANCE PERMIT WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE OR INJURIOUS TO PROPERTY ON THE SHORELINES IN THE VICINITY. 3. THE VARIANCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF PROPERTY RIGHTS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8 . 02. 02. The Vice-chairman polled the affirmative votes for approval of the variance , Commissioners Gist and Mola . Both indicated their agreement . MOTION CARRIED, Teegarden dissenting. 5. NEW BUSINESS : Items of new business were opened for consideration by the Vice- cha4rman . REZONE: A, STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC. ; Appl . No . R-891- 76 ; rezone from R- 1 , S- 1 , and GS- 1 to R- 1 , R-2 , R-3, and R-4 ; also hillside area'• to remain as greenbelt ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of the powerline right-of-way . At the request of the Vice-chairman , the Planning Director reviewed the Stoneway Concrete rezone application , noting the following : size and location of the site ; relationship to residential areas , roadways , and other significant development in the vicinity; Comprehensive. Plan designations.; topography of the parcel ; and former use. Mr. Ericksen noted previous action relative to the Comprehensive Plan designations which include restrictive covenants 'with reference to the property near the Monterey Terrace residential development that provid,e for a buffer area adjacent to the residential area . Proposed rezone configurations were described and greenbelt areas indi - cated . The matter of access was discussed , and the Planning Director noted that at the time of Comprehensive Plan review it was indicated that an alternative access should be considered . It was also noted that the applicant does not proposed to develop the property and does not have any specific plans other than selling it. Renton Planning 'Commi ss , .,,i Meeting November 10, 1976 Page Four Slides , maps , and aerial photographs denoting the character of the area were viewed . Previous use of the site was described ; covenants pursuant to the concerns of the residents of Monterey Terrace established in conjunction with a study of the Compre- hensive Plan in March 1972 were noted ; and current land use in the vicinity was cited. Comments from the applicant were invited by the Vice-chairman . Robert DeBoer, General Manager, Stoneway Concrete , stated that they were basing their application on Ordinance 2708 dated April 1972 , relative to the study of the Comprehensive Plan in the area and associated restrictive covenants . He indicated that they have a prospective buyer and that the sale is dependent upon rezone approval as requested . A review of the provisions of the covenants ensued , including a discussion of the concerns expressed by the residents of Monterey Terrace at the time of the Comprehensive Plan study in the area . Vice-chairman Walker called for comments from the audience in • favor of the proposal . None were received . She then invited comments in opposition . Comments expressing the need for additional access east of Mt. Oliv.et Cemetery, rather than through Monterey Terrace , were offered by those listed below : Donald Capps Chris Wright 63 Monterey Drive 120 honterey P1 . N . E. Gary McKnight Louis Peretti 58 Monterey 115 Monterey P1 . N . E. Margaret Wright Harold Lee 120 Monterey P1 . N . E. 77 Monterey ' Pl . N . E. • Lloyd Salter 76 Monterey P1 . N . E. In addition , concerns were indicated relating to increased density , potential vandalism, noise , traffic control, notifica- tion of other interested parties , and the need for further study . Alternative access. through the Maple Valley Highway was recom- mended. It was also suggested by Mr. Salter that Blaine Ave . N . E .• be closed by the City . Following indications by the Commission that further review was necessary , IT WAS ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE STONEWAY CONCRETE COMPANY APPLICATION FOR REZONE BE CONTINUED AND REFERRED TO THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE FOR STUDY AND REPORT- BACK. Discussion ensued relative to an appropriate time for report back , and the following factors were considered : the antici - pated lengthy agenda for the next scheduled public hearing , the effect of the new Planning Commission and Land Use Hearings Examiner Ordinances , possible continuation of Comprehensive Plan application review to January , expected applications for December review, the possibility of an extra public hearing , and personal holiday commitments . In response to an inquiry concerning the effect of waiting until January for a decision , Mr. DeBoer of Stoneway indicated that time would be satisfactory . Renton Planning Commission Meeting November 10, 1976 Page Five IT WAS THEN ACTION: MOVED BY TEEGARDEN, SECONDED BY GIST, THAT THE ORIGINAL MOTION BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE THAT THE SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE. REPORT BACK CONCERNING THE STQNEWAY CONCRETE REZONE APPLICATION ON JANUARY 12, 1977. MOTION CARRIED. On the original motion to continue the public hearing and refer the matter to the Special Studies Committee for study , MOTION CARRIED. The audience was advised that those interested in attending committee meetings should either leave their names , addresses , and telephone numbers with the Recording Secretary or contact the Planning Department, and they would be notified. REZONE: B, ALBERT HEGL'UND , JR. ; Appl . No . , R-892-76 ; rezone from R-'1 to B-P; property located . at 437 South Whitworth Avenue . The item was opened for consideration , and staff review was requested by the Vice-chairman . The Planning Director noted previous consideration of the area in connection with the applicant' s substation rehabili - tation project to provide additional parking . Mr. Ericksen; discussed the character of the area ; plans for removal of ' an existing house on the property ; site dimensions and proximity to the commercial development ; and the existence of restrictive covenants relating to setbacks , landscaping , and site development of, the original site . He noted the applicant' s agreement that the restrictive covenants be extended to the subject site . Slides , maps , and aerial photographs depicting the proposal were viewed and described . It was noted that access is pro- posed from Shattuck Avenue only. The Vice-chairman invited comment from the applicant. Albert Heglund , Jr. , 3202 38th .Ave. W. , Seattle , noted that the proposed parking would provide up to one hundred off street parking stalls , which are more than required by City ordinance , and will eliminate employee parking on Whitworth Avenue and access to the railroad and produce a better flow of parking . He described proposed retention of trees , park- ing lay-out, internal circulation , fencing , and screening . He noted plans for development of a street-end park on Whit- worth Ave. So: in conjunction with the total development. Mr. Heglund then responded to questions from the Commission regarding relocation plans for the house. Discussion among the Commissioners ensued relating to permitted uses in a B-P zone. • ' Comments in favor of the proposal were requested by Vice- chairman Walker, but none were offered . She then called for comments in opposition to the proposal . Harry Larsen , 419 Whitworth Ave. So .', noted that he was seek- ing more information regarding the proposal and inquired concerning provisions for prevention of access to Whitworth and policing of the area at night.' He noted concern regard- ing the disruption of a quiet neighborhood due to increased traffic on Shattuck . Renton Planning Commission . Meeting November 10, 1976 Page Six The Planning Director advised regarding restrictive covenants providing for limitation of access to Shattuck , plans for fenc- ing , landscaping , and probable lighting of the area . Mr. Erick- sen noted a proposal regarding the Shattuck underpass that will probably also increase the traffic on Shattuck . Mr. Heglund then responded to Mr. Larsen ' s -concerns regarding protection of the neighborhood , noting that it is his opinion that the park will be a deterrent to additional traffic on Whitworth , plans for high fencing around the parking lot , and provisions for adequate lighting . He also indicated that he had 'received the support of contiguous property owners and renters . The Planning Director noted further review by the Planning. Com- mission and the Planning and Public Works Departments when plans are submitted. Further audience comment was invited. Noting none , IT WAS MOVED BY GIST, SECONDED BY WIK, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED. MOTION CARRIED . Following a brief discussion , the following action was taken : ACTION: MOVED BY WIK, SECONDED BY MOLA, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED REZONE TO THE CITY COUNCIL, AS IT AGREES WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ADJACENT USES IN THE AREA, SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT' S FILING RESTRICTIVE COVE- NANTS TO RUN WITH THE LAND AS LONG AS IT IS USED COMMERCIALLY PERTAINING TO THE FOLLOWING:. 1 . PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL OF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN ESTABLISHING A MINIMUM 5 ' LANDSCAPE STRIP AND FENCE ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE AND A MINIMUM 10 ' BERMED LANDSCAPE STRIP AND FENCE ALONG WHITWORTH AVE. SO . 2. PROVISION FOR ADEQUATE INTERIOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING TO THE PROPOSED PARKING AREA. 3. PERMITTED ACCESS FROM SHATTUCK AVE. SO. ONLY. 4. PROHIBITION OF OUTDOOR STORAGE ON THE SITE. .MOTION CARRIED. A recess was declared at 9 : 58 p . m. . The meeting was resumed at 10 : 11 p . m. with all members noted above present. REZONE: C, F. BARTOW FITE ; Appl . R-893-76 ; rezone from G to M-P ; property located on West Valley Highway approx. 450 ' north of S . W. 43rd St. Staff review of the subject application was requested by the Vice- chairman. The Planning Director described the property location , size , sig- nificant development . in the area , Comprehensive Plan designation , and character of the site . He noted that there are no develop- ment plans at present. It was decided not to view slides of the area . Comments from the applicant were invited by the Vice-chairman . Bartow Fite , 5010 - 92nd S . E. , Mercer Island , noted that adja- cent property to the north is zoned M-P ; the Comprehensive Plan Renton Planning Commission Meeting November 10 , 1976 Page Nine disrupt , that installation of sidewalks could possibly affect the grade of Meadow, and that he is willing to file restrictive covenants agreeing to participation for a future L . I . D. should a waiver be granted. As there were no questions of the applicant , the Vice-chairman invited comments in favor of the application from the audience . None were offered . She then called for comments in opposition . Jerry Davis , 2407 Meadow Ave . No . , inquired regarding the spe- cifics of the application . Mr. Ericksen explained the proposal , noting ordinance requirements and willingness of the applicant to agree to covenants requiring participation in an L . I . D . at a later date. Mr. Davis then indicated that he was not opposed to the request. Discussion followed regarding the lack of off-site improvements and a street elevation system for the area , and IT WAS MOVED BY TEEGARDEN , SECONDED BY MOLA , THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE CLOSED . MOTION CARRIED. The following action ensued : ACTION: MOVED BY MOLA, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN, THAT THE COMMISSION APPROVE AN INDEFINITE DEFERRAL OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS SUBJECT TO THE FILING OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS REQUIRING PARTICIPATION IN A FUTURE L. I. D. INITIATED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR CITY INITIATION OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS. There was further discussion regarding the character of the area and justification for the request. On the question , MOTION CARRIED, Gist dissenting. 6. ADMINISTRATIVE: A. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 . LAND USE' COMMITTEE Chairman Teegarden advised that the committee had met on November 3rd with the Kennydale community representa- tives regarding the Comprehensive Plan in the No . 30th' and Park Ave. No . area , and a written report to the Commission will be forthcoming shortly . Commissioner Teegarden advised that a memorandum is being sent to the Special Studies Committee relative to the Glen ' Norwood rezone request in the area advising them of the Kennydale residents position on the matter. • The next meeting of the Land Use Committee is scheduled for November 17 , 1976 , to consider the Comprehensive Plan in the Ripley Lane Planning Area . 2. SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE Chairman Wik called a meeting for November 18 , 1976 , at 7 : 30 p. m. to consider the Stoneway Concrete Company rezone request. B. OTHER 1 . MEETING WITH CITY OF TACOMA OFFICIALS Vice-chairman Walker reported to the Commission regard- ing the meeting with the Tacoma Planning Commission , Hearings Examiner, and Planning Department representa- tives on November 4th . She noted that she had written • Renton Planning Commission . Meeting November 10 , 1976 Page Ten • a report concerning the implementation of the system, current composition and role of the Planning Commission , relationship and liaison with the Hearings Examiner • and Council , formulation of goals and policies , and areas of review. It was decided that a thank you letter should be written to the Tacoma representatives from the Acting Chairman. 2. PLANNING COMMISSION - COUNCIL LIAISON • Vice-chairman Walker indicated that it had been sug- gested that either the .Planni.ng Commission or a com- mittee from the Planning Commission meet with the ' Planning and Development Committee in view of estab- lishing a liaison between the two groups . • • All Commissioners indicated an interest in meeting with the Council committee . It was requested that the Planning Director indicate that some of the members could meet on November 17th at 4 : 30 p . m. 3. COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN Copies of the * Community Development Plan and Housing • Assistance Plan were distributed for Planning Commis- sion information . As there was no further business before the Commission , IT WAS MOVED BY GIST, SECONDED BY TEEGARDEN , THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED. The meeting was adjourned at 11 : 30 p . m. [) C Sandra Gist , Secretary 'Joan Walker, Vice-chairman • • • • • • • • • • • • • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION RENTON , WASHINGTON A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION AT ITS REGULAR MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS , CITY HALL , RENTON , WASHINGTON , ON NOVEMBER 10 , 19 76 , AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS : 1 . VARIANCE FROM THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS ; file No . V-880-76 ; property located in the vicinity of 2700 Mountain View Ave . No . 2 . REZONE FROM G TOB- 1 ; file No .' R-889-76 ; property located at the southwest corner of Sunset Highway and 138th Ave . S . E . 3 . REZONE FROM R- 1 AND S- 1 TO R-1 , R-2 , R-3 AND R-4 ; file No . R-891-76 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple V alley Highway ) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-Way . 4 . REZONE FROM R- 1 TO B-P ; file No . R-892-76 ; property located at 437 South Whitworth Ave . 5 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-893-76 ; property located on West Valley Highway approx . 450 ' north of S . W . 43rd St . ' ' 6 . REZONE FROM G TO M-P ; file No . R-894-76 ; property located on Lind Ave . S . W. and S . W . 10th St . within Earlington Industrial Park . 7 . SITE APPROVAL FOR OFFICE/WAREHOUSE IN AN M-P ZONE ; file No . SA-895-76 ; property located on Lind Ave . S . W . and S . W . 10th St . within Earlington Industrial Park . 8 . WAIVER OF OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR A TWO LOT SHORT PLAT ; file No . W-888-76 ; property located at 2415 Meadow Ave . No . Legal descriptions of all applications noted above on file in the • Renton Planning Department . ALL INTERESTED PERSONS TO SAID PETITIONS ARE INVITED TO BE PRESENT AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON NOVEMBER 10 , 1976 AT 8 : 00 P . M. TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS . PUBLISHED October 31 , 1976 SANDRA GIST SECRETARY RENTON PLANNING ,COMMISSION CERTIFICATION I , MICHAEL L . SMITH , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THREE COPIES OF THE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN THREE CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. ATTEST : Subscribed and sworn ' i /7 -v to before me , a Notary Public , SIGNED '/ ;eke , on t h e 28th d ay of October 19 76 PREUMN, iy RENTON PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT TO REVISION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 10 , 1976 APPLICANT : STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . APPLICATION : REZONE FROM R- 1 , S- 1 , AND GS- 1 TO R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 ; ALSO HILLSIDE AREA TO REMAIN AS GREENBELT . LOCATION : East of SR169 (Maple Valley Highway ) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet Cemetery and west of the powerline right-of-way . FINDINGS AND COMMENTS : 1 . Request is compatible with the Comprehen- sive Plan as amended on March 8 , 1972 , per Ordinance #2708 . 2 . Existing street (Blaine Ave . N . E . ) does not have the capability of handling additional traffic from such higher densities . At least two additional access roads will be necessary. 3. Proposal would establish single family residential and low density multiple residential south of Monterey Terrace with graduated increase in density east- ward away from Monterey Terrace . 4. Other City departments had concerns regard- ing adequate access , utilities , and pro- tection of adjacent properties . 5 . Provisions for restrictive covenants may be necessary to provide binding agreement for proper access , utilities , greenbelt and open space provisions , and development by City P. U . D. Ordinance only . DECISION CONSIDERATIONS : Referral to Special Studies Committee for study and report . ZONING DESIGNATIONS FOR STONEWAY' SITE The following general descriptions should apply to the particular zoning classification established on the property described below : R- 1 ( BUFFER AREA) - PARCEL A The easterly 470 feet of the westerly 720 feet of the northerly 100 feet of the above described property . R-2 - PARCEL B The easterly 800 feet of the westerly 1100 feet of the above described property ; except the R-1 area ( Parcel A) and except that portion defined as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan as revised on May 17 , 1972 , and noted as the hillside area along the south property line and northeast of Maple Valley Highway (SR- 169 ) . R-3 - PARCEL C The westerly 800 feet of the above described property except the southerly 1380 feet of the easterly 300 feet thereof. R-4 - PARCEL D The northerly 1100 feet of the westerly 300 feet of the above described property , except the northerly 300 feet thereof. GREENBELT - PARCEL E That portion defined as greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan as revised on May 17 , 1972 , and noted as the hillside area along the south property line and northeast of Maple Valley Highway ( SR-169 ) . LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ENTIRE STONEWAY SITE All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St . S . R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89 °45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . / J I �\ , \ 1 11 i ill In HUM M • C) • ' \ I I'I A, ' ' i , \ . I ...: .- ). " ''' -‘). - - II I . ,\ f ', 5ll _•� �,r HI 11 a ';� 1 ill ( :.:4:/C)" - i. .�Q �• 1 , A'rt/� /, � , T•L.//,S 1.1./.'�' ' I. 151 l ( Ir IB�,L'll I'r� :� �ti, \ •/ �(� •.t r �Spl TI ? MT. 01.IVI 1 c,t:r'^l IEHY '1 1 /. 8 i �, - p. 3 44 AG. ( 152 �- ,..1.}'71' w ' ISO 17 41- iLi S/I5x U 3rAc. . 11 :: ' : 1 I' II . � -- J66 PI Il 15 14 Z II _ Tel• • :' j •t I 1... Q I -- 3^�9 to Q 1 I a I I n " 5 I Q i`6 12 �i Cc l � fl 1.101 13 r 123 • �12 11y .._.. j2 ' �, Ft51112• n1� T `TRY 1 (, 2,0f.c. 5 e9Y� LIVE 10EM _ ._�9 bl11 1 c� 1 i .':�')A: I i11 Z i. I�I Wit.1 1 ° IV Q r(1- 9 ``: &a,- I I 11 •'ri: ►— z • 56 C7., L �,1(1 1,.._ _ ..„.,, . . . Li. ., o .„.:,., , ./...�' I• M i OLIVE r 11 11 / a il i 751• 1. 4—J , J —' ; =i 15 .,' CL-ME rERY rr ra-iarl,, . 1 t ' 3:). 6 �.. •=l;;�r �.'If �.;i 12' ( I }c{ ; r: 1 3.9�Ac. �, .«.. v, 11, 1 lq— ,I L2 J :. -1—•.I % k I[. lJ,: l'•. . ...5��1. ,. I I .i •/ 1 N• \ •:,r / u'' mv" — 810 yr' i1 iA / P /LTV-1r' �/ /Y ,` O • ... . - r :' T : _ - _. .. • O:•! i '� : -�1. S� ;�r "`\< T k_ ! � !'i � li!Z( 1 I l i1 ;f , , d� ON • ,,: 3 23 Ac. r 1 a7. / 1 � / C it 1 1,4'Zi'''' 1 1 v' - v frilitgl r . ., v „,,,,, . , .,„. . ., Ns. '•„ /\ \ \;2\ ''. ''z'.'4,4-, caterl ____ , Oi‘.\ '' \ I 11 i 1.-6°‘-aco _ 1 :'-R•ii if i ______,-, <, A- . ,., \ ,,, , ,. • ! mat,. - �IJII ,.u _ \ � ! I / c' Y 5 . IiD ,„,, II `\ ,Y �» iM 1nil 1A!V{ ',AM) F.. (,1;nv11 CO 4. 5 lt .5 atit, 1 .\\„.\\\ ,. , „.. „... .,„„, ,,,,,, • ,..,,,, _ \_:_,„., \ . , \.• ., .. ' . ;Pk, `','. ^. -...... .\\ \\, ,:\ ,,,,...„ ..., J - -\ 3.r0 nC. ----..,., 1:.'_- \\ W tt•// \ \ �.\'\� •• 1.. Y•}%#F i-/ram /,_ \ \° • ' \\\ • J -."2 .:.//.` , . x,v • \ '\; \\ ,y 44 . ... ..\\ \ . --.. ''7.N.', ' ' IN 1 CRPALE CORP —� 'N. :t. :\� • 4• alit I) • .,''. : . s / .' \\\1. L\ P • \ I .'''; x•-.„• ,•:,..,,'..., ''.,•,,„, . I! 44 � t �. E; ,>, �� I I r' ' ` 1. ' rI G.E SkANE \ rt \ > +,�x c -< . •a • ` . gn.• t� ..,... 1... c V .,........) )' "N,,,... til (� \yK r \ J I, • 1 rIi '/ 1./ ' \ n �54c. IIG• I) C \ ^+ •N, ....••`..'•••., Se '''... e.,••' k\ \-'•-,./'..--• 'i C;7: '.. : :ig'j /I i . . itr. y / ,1 ..).ir , f. .,• - / ,,... --.,..,,i,,,. •-f.... .„, .,_, z, \• , ,, „..._?..„ .,,. ,,, ,, .. -.-:::,..-. .. .. . \ .i , •6 I /- ,,...<. 7' d 4.„-, .- . '',,,,, ''''''''--- (7-, ..'N. 009 ,N. \.',,•.:• i i • i.1 , • k I _ • �:`�•,� .r...:'.:.._1L'i:..•:.^i'._,..._ '" a,::..4iic1..h.lsJ `-9.s.:k..%Z}2aa.,+?,•ia.tl c9is'3in, .(/rf.stJ i.`c. v.:. /:•'•.,:1 .- .5 -. _ :„..,,,....m..,.,,,,-..,.-,—,..,s.,—..,-..,,,,-rmm-v.1-,-..,,,,-",-",*7 �Y u p • :\ a ' r I I.-I In‘II :.':"--,;--*'l I I 11'/ j•••••---.4 la * \ I''` ikl,L.FI' ...' - '' '. ', .............Ic'''';' '--1-' i-r'''i.,, 7 S ii ! f' z l\ s,r `}r's s ^'4 ' \\. ...\� �. a.. / // I. t , .; 4$r MB'!ea."1 " ' — 4. \0 \\ I//VT// 1" � ; a"h4 mil 11 STONEWAY CONCRETE INC . 6r . ,w 3A�r+; r Pe 1 REZONE / ,i, 0,..:fowitia. Is } MrouvEr iI 1 1. .74PAir _: ,,,L__ .•-•-•••-•”••••••mm•••••-•,...m.•-me- . , r' I I ,/qtoy/ RENTON CITY LIMITS-' 1 / • fi . 1 f' // `�/ ` , n II 11 11 I I 1 1 B \ 1 I I1 1 y"- CUDt.`� i I 1 11 S f ,',,�. 1 1 6)9 9 q I k, ., i..r... I L y 1I rvrN� S. E v T. __ e al „'\' \ : 1 I ,M.j. a w ° • �' , H- 1 '��,.� ��.,`yu,. • \ .. 1 p .:;\ ''; <�° "< ° +� + wu I I 1 `r ''` ° 'T' 1 ' i 1 REZONE : STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . ; Appl . No . R-891-76 ; rezone from R- 1 and S- 1 to_ R- 1 , R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt . Olivet , Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-way . • �- a ±43 . 1 acres with APPLICANT STONEWAY CONCRETE, INC.. TOTAL AREA 24.0 buildable area PRINCIPAL ACCESS East side of Mt ., Olivet Cemetary . • . EXIS.I ING ZONING R- 1 , S- 1 and GS- 1 Abandonedgravel pit . EXISTING USE Rezone to Higher Density from R-1 through .R-4 for PROPOSED USE future residential development. . -- - Single family, low density, medium density COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN and high density multi-family; greenbelt along steep hillside above Maple Valley Highway. COMMENTS i a ^ , . S.114✓7 f -: 1't/ � 7~ ` ~ti ('•I_,`' I`� ` C` ifU i Affidavit of Publication II il Gf STATE OF WASHINGTON •$?ii; COUNTY OF KING ç ss. `, r1.{ ��/'j/ "or''?ra Cnra?Ina being first duly sworn on - NOTICE OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS oath,deposes and saps that 5 oe is the chief clerk of PUBLIC HEARING FOR A TWO LOT SHORT RENTON PLANNING PLAT; file No. W-888-76; THE RENTON RECORD-CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) COMMISSION property located at 205 times a week.That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and RENTON,WASHINGTON Meadow Ave. No. has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred A PUBLIC HEARING Legal descriptions of all • to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- WILL BE HELD BY THE applications noted above on paper published four (4) times a week in Kent,King County,Washington, RENTON PLANNING COM- file in the Renton Planning and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained MISSION AT ITS REGU- Department. at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper.That the Renton LAR MEETING IN THE ALL INTERESTED Record-Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the COUNCIL CHAMBERS, PERSONS TO S Al D Superior Court of the County in which it is published,to-wit,King County, CITY HALL, RENTON, PETITIONS ARE INVITED Public WASH INGTON, ON TO BE PRESENT AT THE Washington.That the annexed is a 'Jo t i c e of NOVEMBER 10, 1976, AT PLANNING COMMISSION 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER MEETING ON NOVEMBER Hearinc=, Plarnifl Commission — Petiti:__nS PETITIONS:LLOWING EXPRESSOTHElR 1. VARIANCE FROM OPINIONS. THE SHORELINE MASTER Sandra Gist, as it was published in regular issues(and PROGRAM R E - Secretary not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period QUIREMENTS; file No. V- Renton Planning 880-76; property located in Commission the vicinity of 2700 Mountain Published in the Renton one View Ave. No. Record-Chronicle October ofconsecutive issues,commencing on the 2. REZONE FROM R-1 31, 1976. R4026 • AND S-1 TO R-1, R-2, R-3 31 day of October ,19 76 ,and ending the AND R-4;file No.R-891-76; • property located east of SR- 169(Maple Valley Highway) . south of Monterey Terrace day of ,19 both dates and Mt.Olivet Cemetery and inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- west of Bonneville Power scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee Right-of-Way. 3. REZONE FROM R-1 TO B-P; file No. R-892-76; charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.�. !.3,Gwhich property located at 437 • • has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the • South Whitworth Ave. first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent 4.REZONE FROM G TO insertion. M-P; file No. R-893-76; • property located on West • - Valley Highway approx.450' J.G. ... — / �'.:�1 rC`'�;��' north of S.W. 43rd St. C J 5.REZONE FROM GTO • chief clerk M-P; file No. R-894-76; property located on Lind Ave.S.W.and S.W.10th St. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 31 day of within Earlington Industrial Park. October 19 '7O 6. SITE APPROVAL • FOR OFFICE/WARE- ll HOUSE IN AN AM-P ZONE; ( file No.SA-895-76;property v 1 `"�tie located on Lind Ave. S.W. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, and S.W. 10th St. within residing at Kent, King County. Earlington Industrial Park. 7. WAIVER OF OFF- - Passed by the Legislature,1955,known as Senate Bill 281,effective June 9th, 1955 — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, • adopted by the newspapers of the State. i - , P U 1.,_ L I C :-.- . C _ .PUBLIC HEARING • CITY OF RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION • A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON NOVEMBER 10, 1976 - 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER THE ITEM I DESCRIBED BELOW:, i u tt REZONE : STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . ; Appl . No. R-891-76 ; rezone from R-1 and S- 1 to '; R-1 , R-2 , R-3 , and• R-4 ; property located east of SR- 169 (Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-way, r l off"�. /. I1.0 HGa / /jiir --, 4 : .. .,, _ \\ \Y '" _ a /7 ___. ______ _ 7 1:--`'---_. 5% -::::...•-;1-;1 1 I.I I 11.1 h µ 'ate• Y '' /\/ .Ai i . /. •IIJ INII Z 9 \ I \\ / / 1 1. ' STONEWAY CONCRETE , INC . P�sea�' MTOLIVET / v :a... } - REZONE WI .���i 116 CEMETERY tt •fj. iedi t ' t` Orr /tip/ ,�.�, , ''/ RENTON CITY LIMITS' 1 ' 1 ' 1 / 1 i ^' ,\ I, \ i a I I 1 1 11 II �'aQ � i �^ �� F� i 1 1 i �1 • \ I - si••,r,;,:,n.. I \ • eta �� \\•�..• C-:'��,�7�•-,j•`� � o ___36....A+1 —1-1 , THE PUBLIC IS INVITED TO ATTEND AND TO EXPRESS OPINIONS OR SUBMIT COMMENTS IN WRITING. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DESIRED, CONTACT: 1 CITY OF RENTON. - PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 235-2550 MUNICIPAL BUILDING, 200 MILL AVE. S. RENTON, WA. 98055 ; I . EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL "A" The west 850. 32 feet of the north 100 feet , ( the west 850. 32 feet being measured along the North line , and the north 100 feet being measured at right angles to the North line ) of the following described main tract : MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; -• said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526. 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the !true point of beginning . Except any portion of said Parcel "A" lying within the Green- belt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" . PARCEL " B" The west 1180. 32 feet , as measured along the North line , of the following described main tract : • MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of ..' Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows. . Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South .89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . Except any portion of said Parcel " B" lying within the north 100 feet of the west 850. 32 feet , as measured at right angles to and along the North line thereof. This exception also known as Parcel "A" . ALSO except any portion of said Parcel " B" lying within the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" PARCEL " C" The east 799 feet as measured along the North line of the following described main tract : MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of - Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a . distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . Except any portion of said Parcel " C" lying within the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" ALSO except the area known as Parcel " D" and more partic- ularly described as follows : Beginning at the Northeast corner of the above described main tract : Thence southerly along the easterly line thereof a distance • of 300 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence westerly parallel with the North line of the main tract herein described a distance of 300 feet to an intersection with a line which is parallel with. and 300 feet westerly of, as measured at right angles to , the east line of said main tract ; thence southerly along said parallel line to an intersection with the rfortheasterly line of the Green- belt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 197Z , said Greenbelt area also known .ias Parcel " E" ; thence Southeasterly along the nlortherly line of said Greenbelt area to an intersection with the East' line of said main tract ; thence nlortherly along the East line thereof a distance of 800 feet more or less to the point of beginning . -2- PARCEL " D" Beginning at the NE corner of the MAIN TRACT as described below : Thence southerly along the easterly line thereof a distance of 300 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence westerly parallel with the North line of the main tract herein des- cribed a distance of 300 feet to an intersection with a line which is parallel with and 300 feet westerly of , as measured at right angles to , the East line of said main • tract ; thence southerly along said parallel line to an intersection with the northeasterly line of the Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 , said Greenbelt area also known as Parcel " E" ; thence southeasterly along the northerly line of the Greenbelt area to an intersection with the East line of said main tract ; thence northerly along the East line thereof a distance of 800 feet more or less to the point of beginning . MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W. M. described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of, said subdivision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway ) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89045 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance ..of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . PARCEL " E" All that portion of the following described main tract designated as a Greenbelt area as shown on the Comprehensive Plan revision dated May 17 , 1972 . MAIN TRACT : All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East , W . M . described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said :subdiviision a distance of 252 . 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 526 . 41 feet ; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 ( St . S . R . #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in -3- a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17 " west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17 " east a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . • -4- • _ N e. 0 0 9.AG. 11� LI • .J - -y '2-.-'� 1•..f, ''.r >i ----- -- - HE°IS I, � U 1'• v/i �Jl •m H G.WIIITf MO 1.6dAc, T'rae-�� I ri.7Bnr • 'wl 1i3: NTE T.[./,,S , 1.,J8�• ' • • Ili< y _�,22..,, . Rio `�iBo.121 �q, �`, �'- -� 0.332:::.. M7.OLIVI'1 LEMLIERY �B -_810. 2_ 044AL. 'I IY 'I®0 17 `.>.41� W 2-'• 5115. •'' rl -- I !-- z 1 Ilzt: , I2 1 yc._-.--- `9O•4:7- Z `1311q II ,61 I I IA ' -- 35 c.,h, . _ i`_ in,r • - t I ,,Li u2 is i 4j�, iii .I tdl 13,_� II •' m, i • Ld — 1•_ ----:sea- of 1 h up (1 1061 5 I ) Q l• e ,23.3..e. „ Q. I U'� I,101 13 t I.3• II -.._ 12 S .2 . G.30 nc. - — 10 5 e9 e $ MT nLNET CEMETERY iQiOo r.,3z gel (d 12 I • r f 211. a ..Y,!'�I bl. • • I I 1 ,I' 0 IBI z ;.4 ^�V o ���i�� „It, m , �Ir w l zrs p 561 C o• :l`C,� I /�", MT OLIVLT --- -_ ! 11 1 �'• 2„ . • ;106 1_,, /L57 L' CEMETERY it u ae n+e- �'I 1 A. y ,y �;%w I ... It . \ N.V. It r.( I .-�� tfr v. v 4. ftl. ti/ 3.95Ac. I^ 2.13AL . , I' b 9� 3 2JJJ I. / A ylo L /' , Ole, Tr,/ CZ, . ... ,...... . _,.;, :5;,,- e 4 .Ac � i - sot . . r.t, j ie r.� ..I • PAR , /c2� CG. Ir" - `pARCEI_ =_,:- - 3 Acres ,✓ s\ >p\ . RAG. . - ttt5 41ic, ., ;Rs.dir . L I •it 1 Lu �i9\ <" ,r z6 a11 r p II ,'r' ,,• SI(jLWAY SAND & GRAVEL CO I • LOCK . �\ \ - I� •�rcu {\•�\ \\ J . �.. -5.441511r A - -X, • \\ '� J.!'0 AG. . 0'� •.. . NX,s., •ks`, • 1\ • s':•‘:.',:‘,....... _.'....,•," ‘ \,‘ .' '-.1-„, ?,., '*s•'. , * V . . . ti\Y' I Ares \ l"l G.F. SHANE 4 /\ s' \e,ii N.:-.1,- • ,.. � FF. ter-.-,-- 111 ,I .d l�• :,nu ���.`�• - sa 1, I \ ,le,,`�1 rt,qg�i',} Slt o i sg•4ih I' , 1. a",,,i \"' t'✓,wf, 13,03 A t, �i /�1 f` 1 e' "zz, A iiIIQ 91 I,. .6 •1�.8.r d q r ual -.' \�_ 1/\!11 0 .I \\�\ �\ _'_ n- ``1 I♦\P.'11`vr. -..11• ._ ,e_.!1 . • • Public Notices Public Notices - NOTICE OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS PUBLIC HEARING FOR A TWO LOT SHORT RENTON PLANNING PLAT; file No. W-888-76; COMMISSION property located at 2415 RENTON,WASHINGTON Meadow Ave. No. A PUBLIC HEARING Legal descriptions,of all WILL BE HELD BY THE applications noted above on RENTON PLANNING COM- file in the Renton Planning MISSION AT ITS REGU- Department. LAR MEETING IN THE ALL INTERESTED COUNCIL CHAMBERS, PERSONS TO SAID CITY HALL, RENTON PETITIONS ARE INVITED WASHING T.O N, ON' TO BE PRESENT.AT THE NOVEMBER 10, 1976, AT PLANNING COMMISSION 8:00 P.M. TO CONSIDER MEETING ON NOVEMBER THE FOLLOWING 10, 1975 AT 8:00 P.M. TO PETITIONS: EXPRESS THEIR 1. VARIANCE FROM OPINIONS. THE SHORELINE MASTER Sandra Gist, PROGRAM RE - - • • Secretary QUIREMENTS; file No. V- Renton Planning 880-76; property located in Commission the vicinity of 2700 Mountain Published in the Renton View Ave. No. Record-Chronicle October 2. REZONE FROM R-1 31, 1976. R4026 AND S-1 TO R-1, R-2, R-3 AND R-4;file No.R-891-76; property located east of SR- 169(Maple Valley Highway) south of Monterey Terrace and Mt.Olivet Cemetery and west of Bonneville Power Right-of-Way. 3. REZONE FROM R-1 TO B-P; file No. R-892-76; property located at 437 South Whitworth Ave. 4.REZONE FROM G TO M-P; file No. R-893-76; property located on West Valley Highway approx.450' north of.S.W.43rd.St. 5.REZONE FROM G TO • M-P; file No. R-894-76; property located on Lind Ave.S.W.and S.W.10th St. within Earlington Industrial Park. 6. SITE APPROVAL FOR, OFFICE/WARE- HOUSE IN AN AM-P ZONE; file No.SA-895-76;property located on Lind Ave. S.W. and S.W. 10th St. within Earlington Industrial Park. 7. WAIVER OF OFF • - / ` ROUTE SCHEDULE . PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE ROUTED I Dm/a PLEASE REVIEW THIS APPLICATION FOR: s..I/( E Z 0 MAJOR PLAT. SITE APPROVAL SHORT PLAT SPECIAL PERMIT WAIVER SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT OR EXEMPTION AND RETURN TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT WITH ANY COMMENTS YOU MIGHT HAVE , BEFORE l�/Tim/76 SIGNATURE OR INITAL DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL DATE -V,cam; Cry'_,„."--' TRAFFIC ENGINEERING � �� /o _ - -7-4 FIRE i/fill /D/2G4( HEALTH Ec.I 04,Sal L V,r ./v! 2df7 REVIEWERR ''S COMMENTS OR APPR VAL CONDITIONS : -A/. . -c_5.4-LdeP 4- ./zp ) ' ci uiN l f L / r «.S CS/iT'�"u'�=f.� �`�1lil�wrAcJt��. 2,v,,e..� �C5 �,/4,�u.a.4rly �S.scSS r -<* e 1.?1y J 7;74' i. %:i, irEr-9�,-, .517, 5/P�/ e-4'Ce" /.S G1 F'/ ,Pa( t):Y-f.. :',. /_ -GLGf 0lo -SRO c..��.. - �'�C�`` t3 .4 JlC x2,— 'r- ! U'C/LLw� Oi L. J'i l tl PLEASE SIGN THE E , I ,W , : e s ROUTING FOR REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORMS TO : 4 Finance Department Fire Department 411 Library Department 40 Park Department - Police Department Public Works Department Building Div. , Traffic Engineering Div . Engineering Div . Utilities Engineering Div. FROM : Planning Department , (signed by responsible official or his designee) f I AA L- LMfT1-( SUBJECT.: Review of ECF- ; Application No . : Action Name : 5'Cokiev0A C-e,-Nie -�-: ( 1. Please review the attached . Review requested by ( date) : REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : 2zb 6 . Comments : eP ------ --,--7;a-ii /15-0,--ft- -6,-1/761s-e-74 c--,,-, u,--(.42_ 61-0, ,j, f , ,,„ O 6--//ttk- Q c 6-._-e - -e'. cV6‘- ---' 11 .e w4-{: r 1en-- /0- 6-7-‘ Signature of Dir- .• r or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : .Jo. ' Comments : rie -,ri ,/s-ss.G.,,/'/ oG -o,'.r -2.4' 40-,-- s// Gz/�i�%�c�° by �ti y ts' o-o /1?Gi� /Ji.,a ci e•- ,A, S��i1i�eA.Y./t 1.��.*e� GL,,,eas- rc.- S'u/�c),J.0-d.�r„0 42,—'e_0._ .�'` �e-uc..4� /asp-...,E✓ (C)/2-/ / C. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 6-76 (OVER) REVIEW BY OTHER CITY ;:..:PARTMENTS : Department : v � IviLS Comments : _r„.r„,.,,,t,,�,,, a, id Qzt. h f u /v 4Sse s s s%J/ /Q0,�C L!�//9' I/r� :.Ya �^ W 4 // G/wS /(VG�I�GIJ K +��� �� t'e,, cry RIP. ' 3 '44'V- S 4C Sisk IS 5. ce t 'f-L5 Arc ss/h S CIA"' �:� (z. D-4 415 , 24„i (0/2-dh-6 Signature of Director or,.Author ' zed Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : Department : �� a ,I/; 6/-4` 17� Comments : f/2,ee 4 Cc eS.5' ✓� ! ,; "f= e /e—%%s UB �/ / ,c?c2(7 L' ) /a Signature of Director or Authorized Rep'entative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : s� , Department : Comments . Gvd 67te /274G A-i i /�vo/e/i-/ XS 75 136=7 /QsMzz,eO S_ O, s %',c-2 C /i% a/21- /`I,( cS Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date REVIEW BY OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS : • Department : T.:2)40 C omme n t s : Sign ure of Direc or or uthorized Representative Date • • CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Application No. lP- ,icJ/ Environmental Checklist No. .ee6-tgo- PROPOSED, date: FINAL, date: Declaration of Significance Declaration of Significance DDeclaration of Non-Significance Declaration of Non-Significance COMMENTS: Introduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment. 'i The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision makers , include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are rele- vant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review with- out unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal , not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, with- out duplicating paperwork in the future. NOTE : This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal . If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent Stonewey Concrete, Inc. • 2. Address and phone number of Proponent: P.. 0. Box 509 Renton, WA. 98055 226-1000 3. Date Checklist submitted 10-11-76 4. Agency requiring Checklist City of Renton Planning Department 5. Name of proposal , if applicable: Renton Highlands 6. Nature and brief description of the proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : • Rezone of property approyecLfor comprehensive land use, plan under Ordinance No. 2708 on May 8, 1972 with declaration of Restrictive Covenants. Zoning of area request is for partial R-1, R-2, R-3 and R$ and open space as depicted on "Stoneway Exhibit A" dated March 8, 1972. -2- 7. Location of proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal , as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts , including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal ) : Located east of SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway), south of. Monterey Terrace and Mt. Olivet Cemetery, west of Bonneville Power right of way. 8. Estimated date for completion of the proposal : Unknown - rezone only • 9: List of all permits , licenses or government approvals required for the proposal (federal , state and local --including rezones) : Rezone 10. Do you have any plans for future additions , expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes , explain: • No 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain: Yes. If rezoned and sold, to be used for multiple housing ter restrictive covenants. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- posal ; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Attached - Comprehensive Land Use approval.. II . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) (1) Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? YES MAYBE NO (b) Disruptions , displacements , compaction or over- covering of the soil? YES ' MAYB-E NO (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X YES- MAYBE N- (d) The destruction; covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? X YES MAYBE NO • (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands , or changes in siltation , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X YES MATTE N-0-- Explanation: • -3- (2) Air. Will the proposal result in : (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X YES MA B NO (b) The creation of objectionable odors? YES MAYBE N (c) Alteration of air movement,, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course of direction o.f water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X YES MAYBE NO • (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns , or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X YES MAYBE NO (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? X YES MAYBE• NO (e) Discharge into surface waters , or in any alteration surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X YES MBE N • (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters , either through direct additions or withdrawals , or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? X YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates , detergents , waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X YES MAYBE NO (i ) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? YES MAYBE A Explanation : (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of flora (including trees , shrubs , grass , crops , microflora and aquatic plants)? . YET— MAYBE (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? $_ YES- MAYBENO pa (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? _ Y�E — MAYBE N-O . (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? E(t M YBE Explanation: • I - -4- (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species , or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms , insects or microfauna)? X YES M YBE NO (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? X YES MAYBE NO ,,CO. Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? YES MAYBE NO (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? YET- MAYBE Explanation (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? _X_ YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X YES WE Explanation: • (8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? YES MMAYBE NO Explanation: S-1 to R-2, R-3, R-4 zoning (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X YES MAYBE NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: • (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil , pesticides , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location. distri- bution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? X YES MAYBE N(U- Explanation: Rezoned for higher density population • , -5- (12) Housing. X. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or "create a demand for additional housing? Y - MAYBE NU X {y Explanation: L LA A,t 1) �.Y,►..,A 1 G cAtAA .o r :,`rs9os :q d's es±J-±li u on asa b xsd • (13) Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? YES- MAYBE NO (b) .Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand �fl ' `f"or view parking? YES MAYBE A (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X TES— MAYBE NO (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or , movement of people and/or goods? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? YES MAYBE NO (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists 'or pedestrians? X YET MAYBE NO Explanation: HighAr dpngity #ran row zoned • (14) Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon , or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas : X • (a) Fire protection? YES MA1TBE NO (b) Police protection? 2 X YES MAYBE NO (c) Schools? YES MAYBE NO • • (d) Parks or other recreational facilities?. X YES MBE (e) Maintenance of public facilities , including roads? YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? gg YES MATBE , NO Explanation: Higher density than now cnripd (15) Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X^ YES MAYBENO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? gg— YES MAYBE N n9.aer' _. edo5l Explanation: 4. (16) Utilities . Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities : (a) Power or natural gas? X Yam— M YBE NO (b) Communications systems? X YES MAYBE NO (c) Water? X YES MAYBE, NO \- -6- (d) Sewer or septic tanks? X YES MAYBE NO (e) Storm water drainage? X YES MAYBE NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? yy YE-S MAYBE NO Explanation: Land has no utilities at present tine. • (17) Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of . any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding • mental health)? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public , or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive $ site open to public view? YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X YES MAYBE NO Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical . Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? YES MAYBE i Explanation: III . SIGNATURE I , the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any decla- ration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: • ( (signed-) - Robert er (name F ..Ze • • City of Renton Planning Department 5-76 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Northerly 100 feet, measured perpendicularly to the Northerly line of those portions of the following described properties lying Westerly of a line drawn Southerly, perpendicularly to said Northerly line, from the most Easterly corner of Lot 17, Block 4, Monterey Terrace Addition, according to the plat recorded in Volume 50 of Plats, page 36, records of King County, Washington: said properties being described as follows: Parcel Al (Tax Lot 3) All that portion of the Southwest one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M., lying East of State Road No. 5 (Maple Valley Highway) (SR 169) and South of a line beginning at the East one-quarter corner of said Section; thence West 1,325.85 feet from said East one-quarter corner; thence North 1°00'00" East a distance of 252.22 feet to the true point of beginning of said line; thence West 653.91 feet to said State Road No. 5, and Parcel B: (Tax Lot 109) Beginning at the (Southwest corner of the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 17, Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M.; thence North along West line of said subdivision a distance of 252.23 feet; thence East 526.41, feet; thence South 88000'00" East a distance of 799 feet to the East line of said Section 17; thence South along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of said section 17; thence West along the South line of said Northeast'' one-quarter to the point of beginning. / 1 li .0 it VI it r II I Il il Il 11 • III . II i I lu ,.._,I . , 4ISPIr4 ---41.%r -: let": lI II -g."'". .1- ' IlliVil : - i'/.- :/f i' i. 0001 c'41/ min.- II II II V ,f ndY I, II 1 A il / �I1 fl I i, „Tr . ,,,,,--- , ..,,, Ar' e/ pi efell /9-1011 ?>"4-10-7/ —irri 7-fr t — 1 1IL • 'di! f, rj , L aJ - dr .(1V2?-il P I a- 00 • % — ®�� 7...i ,ff--0/ -72( --1,1 2 ..1 -P117, 0 -121/ [I40 , ClA j --,--: • - Ce_S C4ra=41, .I --''''-')9 -IP 1--0,g ,, - \ r' I! RECFIUED � CITY OF RENTON REZONE APPLICATION OCT i 1976 -57 For Office Use Only: A,/ Rss •, APPL. NO. PP 7e PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 4opi-e cJ $50 FEE; RECEIPT NO. gatc7 APPEAL FILED FILING DATE is -// - 7.e CITY COUNCIL ACTION ig/'Tre/ea HEARING DATE � - /o ORDINANCE NO. & DATE ,.3/i3 • APPLICANT TO COMPLETE . ITEMS 1 THROUGH 10 : • 1. Name Stoneway Concrete, Inc. • phone 226-1000 2. Address P. O. Box 509, Renton, WA. 98055 3. Property petitioned for rezoning is located on Gov't Lot 8 . • between Monterey Terrace and SR 169 (Maple Valley Highway) 4. Square footage or acreage of property approximately 24 acres 5. Legal description of property Cif. more space is required, attach separate sheet) • See Attached • • • • • 6. Existing zoning • R-1 and S-i Zoning Requested R-1, R-2, R-3. R-4 ® - -e27pd' NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered' in reclass- ifying property. Evidence or additional information to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application Procedure sheet for specific requirements) . Submit this form in duplicate. 7. Proposed use of site. Varied density housing from R-1 thru:R-4 as proposed by City of Renton Ordinance No. 2708 with attached declaration of Restrictive • - Covenants. . 8 . List the measures to be taken to reduce impact on the surrounding area. 1. As proposed by ntri eti vp covenants 2. Access from NE 3rd St. from East side of Mt. Olivet Cemetery 3_ Greesbelt of Hillside along SR-169 9. How soon after the rezone is granted do you intend to develop the ._. - site? One - two years • 10. Two copies of plot plan and affidavit of ownership are required. Plannirig Dept. 2-73 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Govern- ment Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North , Range 5 East, W. M. described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one- quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of said Section 17 ; thence north along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252. 23 feet to the true point of beginning ; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet; thence south 88°52 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence south along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the East line of said section to an intersec- tion with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No . 5 (St. S . R. #169 ) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of 653. 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning . • 4. • AFFIDAVIT . I, Robert H. DeBoer , being duly sworn, declare that I am theGenea. onoet property involved in this application and that the foregoing s a em n s and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Subscribed and, sworn before me . this - day of C...�=-2//�/ , 19 7[' , Notary Public in and for the at" of Washington, residing atlL . (Name (000tary Publ7 (Signature of ) General Manager / . "" / 7/ P. O. Box 509 (Address) (Address) • Renton, WA. (City) • (State) 226-1000 (Telephone) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) V • CERTIFICATION This is to certify tha -he foregoing application has been inspected by me and has been founrV4oFbd 1��r ough and complete in every particular and to conform to the a."- es [[ 'd r4?i ations of the Renton Planning Department governing the i'`lsng _gf(i1s�chC'a plication . i d 37a Date Received 19 By: #6 DEPP` Renton Planning Dept . 2-73 . .. • , . . •-• , , i t--, .. il . rY—ArNII:T' tF/ % ,- -il'' x----; ..... '-i' ..'.- ' i 1, 1 .. I " wiNusoK was I -- -i- - 4 -'•• - .• ---I,' ,',%, - t._ _-OCATIONAL 1 1 1 i • i/ ' ." .-\'' \ ... ,-.1 PARK . y__. , I LII ', I - , ; .. • . ° V.1.;I.- . . 71 SCHOOL ! I •" '... ,,, ';' ,• ,>"4"._2,_ , • 1---------'—' 1 \ \ _<_::::..,„,.,•<-..._--•-'.-- --. • r \ \ I r / liZE=M1:113:C1::= • I I i i \ s . \ \ \ s i1 • 5‘" • , , „ 1 II:, 1 - E . '''1 _1, \ \ • \ \ .5^.9- .,,,..,..?;45 I Is? r , .....,r...1./..ejc,./1‘,..A4c.:4,,,,:.:1...):::,,.:.c.44:.(1.:7{:.:4 ji.,.14(14;fr/.11:1:1)•;,: f.r.1"[1:"....5.4)..p;--P'1‘C /C,V,if'',y,-vy•',4. .• . ,,,,,x ..., ,.....,../.. .c,..„ . C. - 0 . •--• ./) .4cit?Kr.(1;•.),I .ri-r,01%.':i•3/4,21%' ------....•-• /4", ,,,..,„„.. ., Ii.,, — 1 • ' .0` -‘, 02'; ... - • ,, \.'• . ) t ..,:,,i.)-: Am,,..,...,.a,),e- ,rij.,g • AS ey 1 r i' . a 44,4,• '. • - r.r.. ,r ilik)A11.,, si *AI • . ,, 1 i rt'i 1• V 'if. I.:?7 .01 -4—,77.--=, IScr11.;11.V.timf Oil . IP.= .1.a.bi,m1 -.-,, \. -1,s.) % 4°1' • /1.• .,•-filif / ,----- ilt ••,k, ,,'.(..(11:.kte,A:'.Si': 0 Pr." ' :... '. , • • ....'NI il' .41,... IVI• .- I.,• 'i'l qtt, •'. ,I:;.C.,/ •,56:,://ii• e eisv..111-'.. 311° -'`i• •r% - - • ---...:-•ipt ..Trarli,4 .2 ,---- y.1,1'4.'4170',.f)jeti.it'ycr.,;1 );:.'" %:/c.rf-Viir' ' .• ....,.. 4. . 'f'-•,-. •ii-t..Y1c>- -.70-,q," ..ii, tit. if i:a... ,,1 11 H111.11111111111 .. 1 - ; • illr,r7.11I *t; . . . .„, .,:r ,./ , ‘. . . .?;f• .; ,r• A. lil r /r ,rt iS' •:• •wil NI .-,.., , ir ,‘.,:;.. (ti 4.t t-I 1-Pe Y''. • ).,,, t f ‘0 •-i .1' .r. sAleri'P le 1 ..a.• . I A.41, ,.,..•,. )!;"‘" v",i'llf.11111.,:s.1,..);7 ,...,—f .1 4 , •- I, ,...;;;•'-'' s ,s I.:, 10! '; -' -.1 Ik 6.fIki(tt-•.r.N e'trP iff '/.1').(ii,,Ie'e,-3'WI;b`"•,:.. . • -... l'..:`....) . -' l rilI '-i,.0 '''', r• '''' . •• - •,•-•* -- ''' 4Mir,' ''') • %=-- -- / /)1 ' ------, I ' .:. 't,,...,,;-, -.I, ..t.i- . T., /t.I' . f;-...i.‘. j-,"....:-....,• ::::---,::--_-.:•••:-.,-;:::::-,-..-- .,,y }iiiii ) '•\•1,,, s/ X 1 )11-,t,ti‘ . , •cvf' c n-1; •:,.. V 'p', . i ,..40:: . ‘• - — ..-- ..-....,.-.-,,,..-.:,,,,,.,.,•,;;• , ...-. , 1..4.1, ',:-i-A,..--- 1 •,';' ); '1 '1 ', '..'$.'- * - , -,.... ...?,,,,. 1,)_•:-T ..yr,..3-= .. _,../. --..-. ' ,,,...,-, r.,..--„:„...,---,-,,-.4?-...,...-.,-.-...-._...:.- - ..,....:,,,.., -•.,,!,./, ,:s..?,--..,, % . 't iiiii Y'i'i,c!, ... / /r•ri .1.. _,- - • :-_-/. '..'..- •' '•,,./A-2'....,, , .._ -`3:'-';.-,, ;----,---' ,..:-:.1-'' -' f-----__ \\..ki".)ik:, /I , r,ri.(-• -- .:-.--;-'_'::. .-.-:=.--_..'"40;:-.)_-$.;:..7A, .%,1-;:'&,-,- ','..j,, r.-. :i.•,-; '-*''''l 'i; .111111 li)Vfi/..... // 1 -:---- - .H,-.-.' --:::::,•;'„A:"----,10-4-c<05A, ._,'-.,,:c'.::::::.::::;:: .,.;;; a Z-A' 31.`1 :'\. III rif;i2ijr* ...... .--/ • ' .• '. , , '. ' '...... '„.:...-i,...,;:. ---(1-0, ,,--,....g_e?,...,,,v.,s,& ,...,-.%,„„. •-zi..,,J,.... ,,, ,,,, . . ''' NicWAI,.. .1-4., . 14-,-,/ i'-..1.._. ...:-.. •: --. -. - . ,,J.,,,,,;.-p:, ,....le.k. v-,:,,_„.4\''.k---.,-1.;,-.-,1:•,‘.'.,•:-:.,1u,-,-;••,.,,•,..,-,,..,, .......0.,11;,1.;,...t„, . . •••1,.. 1/4.•:...., ,, ,.......; ,, . - , .. -...-••,-,-.4-..14_,I.,,,ti,\• ....`,.-,c,-,,.\,-ft.-\s.-( `.!-,c.,•' .\•.',Y...•-•,?.-..s,t'..,'.s..:;-t..0).•.; • --•.:.•,---•&:-;,,‘ ‘..c.,• -\'-'.,-......,-,-- -;.•-•r-A-:,4.;\.\\:\•.\•-•- \--- . ‘\ "v •if•N,>.-"-'2-'3,.t.9(.:•. . 11111 •6i(i •li .i.,..-.•••••• , .. .-• ,' --•.-f.-2.f:‹•;-:-I.,..1•:-:o.c.'s .------ --'- k:k., ..4..„. L,7•,;. •,;, ,.,,i.‘..- , •.-: ,•,v..ty..„.....1.;„1:..,,k1v-.1.r.,..,,,. se..• ',,,,a(3.1'1,1 '-•-• ' ' - • - , ''•.,...1Z,.t.,._-1f ,.;\•' . k cl 4k-S,I\A`4.:-.;---C.1.-.-:.•".•,-;'... JIB • iy .re-. ..--.;--, •. .. .9„--- -,,,,,,;,;',..•\y„?.;.,........)„,..;,.„.. ) ,'i S-+'3 ‘....\k-l'\•:"'"'"N-", -. ' il 1'. -fr' ' - :' ' . •-?,""-,(:.:-C.,--''-'-'.:',.'..1r• • . .-)",..',..% -\'''',,.°6-1. si:C,' . . $ti, 1 .3.'‘Ct,',eA'',4.11,-,•:,1-'-ki'`,:,•-•,-,. lk Ly-?,.(4 ',,;.. -..-, . . - ....-4,Av.,-,=.7.---,p,igli, . .,-,,.c-;,...,6,-;.;.,,,-,.:.,•;,,N •V-_,,!,v!,!-r-ce- t).`,,,I;"..12 q,'.::--:•;‘,....s>/).'4+ •-.,... ...--- —• --- ..—;-4.:>'.9-,-f:-.-c.5:11;'1),:,?."-- . , -47 \,,, ‘-1,—...-,,-..41--;"7-%,..,..i.v0.1, . Lf e, 9,,,.-.....-...,.:„..„...., ...,“-,..,...-,:•-,....?,-..1.7.:.<:-.4-....5;::-..,--.-..--. •\'''4.•,.. .',C,..-..,,,."..1,::,•:,!,* 4....y.,46... -"'•'cl-,0:,:.;:1\S'.,--,,-\ ,..I...t‘)..,.1.._-r ,...-.,,./..-•:-..-,,,,,,,,4,-.?.....:,..-J,-.,-;.„„,.---_„_,.--•,_,.....7.:.,....,-.,......,,,...L.,„,.!.,.5,.., ,..,.;‘,....,:,A.,.,:p.,...,,„ ,.,,,..7,,,,,,,....--.--,....-..-..?,-.2,-„,„„--.1,---- vt,-,c ::..z,,,,,,,•::;.,4•,.=.\.:‘, \ , , .. • ' ',1.? #!jt;1-• - .41%.!....!„',..%‘:),LI' .'"-;.'1.\;?\Ci'''..,,...'4,-,11;.t''',‘,..?I‘?-'•'?‘II:'-‘1- 7.44'.'''''':::.."-'47'' I.'-:-'75;.6.'11BEBN;.;...'ISINIIIIIINNHHAF.,,,, 1:,,,,..:;•,\1> ''tv'IF"-:'. I •I''-t•k i;1 • (,, ,,,,,.... „._%,4,.,,,,-....t:, ,- . ,-:',,,,---'1.‘ -•':,,-.1 . -I\L'''1',211',:!•:it',IiV.,"•;-.,-• ...., -' ---7.-..-.._. . 11.11 — .. .-l- 5 ffil4?A ''‘ ‘z,......„..; • . 'I' ' '? ''--.•iI.\-t'1.-• • ,,,.-: ..,-. ---• tilliwp vaiiNIN ppoppita,„,w• (''.H.,,'4-*,..',) .. ,.. . ,.... , , - ---- - - -Oa se:,is .ignig#A, 4,40,,10 ..,;,1\se. i.,..... • / ICI:\" ti 1\11Eb 01, , . ,• ..., _._,,,,..::,._ .. ._... ,, \ „\, „, II •,., .. 4,-.90A 6 oT• Illee' 4k.ite-. . - ---_,. --- A.I 1,11). .--..-+:,..-.-"--4 I 1 LIZ Ai-Vik.' ' • 2 P i r 1 •ft....V . j 1 i l \ '\ ......... q4111:: S i • y. ' 1 , , \,. -------„--___. • 4110,7,-gym.1 I a 0 4 • - i , \ ,......\,• 4,„A-.0.., ,•,, ?tip.,,t a 7 i ...., ,, ‘ , , , I • ,..'...-.; 4. ---774,'/' .,... ft, ,c1..Vi ' . .'V MI6- --DS-VS, .. EWAY EXHIBIT A" as revised March 8 , 1972 _ - PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE CITY OF RENTON' S COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN Property Description: That general area included within the following boundaries, FAI 405 , NE 3rd and 4th streets , Union Avenue NE and SE, and the bluff line north of Maple Valley Highway. ,... LEGEND . - . Quasi- Public Use or l• •. 110 ,Single Family Residential .w/A Low Density Multi Family Res. --..._ 1.-;1 Recreation • 1111111 Medium Density Multi Family Res . F-71 Greenbelt • ---- --- ! •- - - - Proposed Boulevard -H-igh-De-nsity Multi Family Res. ...... -- - ( ) ,i, A�� ORJDINANCE NO® 1921 • /'2. '` AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, REVOKING AND ELIMINATING PARAGRAPHS (3) (a) and (b) OF SECTION 4-725 OF TITLE IV (BUILDING REGULATIONS) OF ORDINANCE NO. 1628 ENTITLED "CODE OF GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF RENTON" BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON AS FOL7;C15: SECTION I : Existing paragraphs (3) (a) and (b) of section 4-725 of TITLE IV (BUILDING REGULATIONS) of "Code of General O; dinances of the City of Renton" reading as follows: _ . (3) Any ordinance granting and providing such change in use district boundaries or reclassification of property, after petition therefore by the property owner or owner as1 ereinabove provided, shall remain effective for a period of .one ( years from the effect- ive date of such ordinance, unless the property owner or any one of the owners originally petitioning, or their successors in interest , `t...`ic may be, have commenced a change of use during said -erre7TiAtEE i ea'_• i riod. I f no change of use has been commenced within said time, the ordinance granting such change in use district boundaries or recla:;si_ fica.tion shall be null and void, in which case the use and c.l rr; fication in existence immediately prior to the filing of said petition sLall become effective again as to such property. The term • "c::m:ivFmocC4 a change of use" means (-) The physical alteration reguirieg a building permit; or (b) substantial evidence of occupancy, operation, usage or con- . duct 'b .:=e1 on such reclassification However, the ow r or owners of property so rezoned or rcclassi Jied may petition the NI� INE� z, ` t least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of said y:..--.r period, for an extension of such time limit, Such petition 4wzst be submitted in w j .in a�� tin the specific reason or reasons for such request. The may thereupon, if it specifically finds proper cause to exist, extend such period up to but not to exceed twelve: (12) months , and any such extension shall be subject to final approval by the City Council. be and the same are hereby repealed and cancelled in all respects . SECT_T_C a IT: All other parts and provisions of said Section not in- consistent with the foregoing shall remain in full force and effect. SF:'^"_C'?__Cy : This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage , approval . aed legal publication. PASS:: BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 21st day of November , 1961. /s/ Helmie Nelson Helmie Nelson, City Clerk APPRCVED BY TH-. .MAYCR this 21st day of November , 1961 • s _Frank Ali_m,,nt Frank i 1 ment-4 :yor APPROVE: AS '.. L'O___'rz ORDINANCE NO. 1921 /s/ (-- - T,. 1r_1_1 rn Grub i, -_ 'j, City aittocn:.y f . DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS • WHEREAS, Stbneway Concrete Inc. , a firm incorporated in the State of Washington, are the owners of real property in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington, described as follows : The Northerly 100 feet, measured perpendicularly to the Northerly line of those portions of the following described properties lying Westerly of a line drawn Southerly, perpendicularly to said Northerly line, from the most Easterly corner of Lot 17 , Block 4 , Monterey Terrace Addition, according to the plat recorded in Volume 50 of Plats, page 36 , records of King County, ' Washington: said properties being described as follows: Parcel A: (Tax Lot 3) All that portion of the • Southwest one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M. , lying East of State Road No. 5 (Maple Valley Highway) (SR169) and South of a line beginning at the Est one- quarter corner of said Section; thence West 1,325 . 85 • f8et from said East one-quarter corner; thence North 1 00 ' 00" East a distance of 252 . 22 feet to the, true point of beginning of said line; thence West ,653 . 91 feet to said State Road ,No. 5, and Parcel B: • (Tax Lot 109) Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast one-quarter of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East; W.M. ; thence North, along West line of said sub- division a distance of 252 . 28 feet; thence East 526. 41 feet; thence South 88 00 ' 00" East a distance of 799 feet to the East line of said Section 17; thence South along said East line to the East one-quarter corner of said Section 17; thence West along the South line of said Northeast one-quarter to the point of beginning; WHEREAS , the owners of said described property desire to impose the following restrictive covenants running with the land as to use, present and future, of the above described real property; NOW, THEREFORE, the aforesaid owners hereby establish, grant and impose restrictions and covenants running with the land • as to the use of the land hereinabove described with respect to the use by the undersigned, their successors , heirs , and assigns , as follows : NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES , • ' SHALL BE LOCATED OR CONSTRUCTED WITHIN ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THE H. G. WHITE MONTEREY TERRACE ADDITION TO THE CITY OF RENTON, AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 50 OF PLATS, PAGE 36 , RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON. SUCH AREA SHALL BE MAINTAINED CONTINUOUSLY IN A NEAT AND CLEAN MANNER. IF NOT SO MAINTAINED, THE CITY OF RENTON SHALL HAVE THE OPTION TO ASSUME • RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH MAINTENANCE AND . SHALL BILL THE PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THE COST THEREOF. IF UNPAID FOR MORE THAN SIXTY (60) DAYS, ' SUCH BILL SHALL BECOME A LIEN AGAINST THE PROPERTY. • ...+ . .ier..c.. . wxr..r... i...na.u.,w........,.1.......».J:la�...+.rw.6.'a.W.,,... ..,:al.t:.l[ii..... .,,.t f .. '.LL, - .'ld•.. ;....•... ..... • • Declaration of Restrictive Covenant.; Stoneway Concrete Inc. Page 2 • Any violation or breach of any of these restrictive covenants may be enforced by proper legal procedures in the Superior Court of King County by either the City of Renton or any property owners adjoining subject property who are adversely affected by said breach. /'/ • Stonewa)/Concrete Inc. , b : P. 6i. cOUN-),TICE 11ES Dk•j•1 F I Stonewa Concrete Inc. , by. Y • STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING On this • day of i•';; .:r'! ;r , l9 , before me personally appeared (j n ;, and; - ; • k .�. _, who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said persons for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary I'ubiic in and 'ior the State of Washington , residing at . , , • ( J.c6,. 1 7 '� r • • • LL