Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA89-045 i • I .c I. Ihe General Contractor lllll rend,location Ira Z.teoetlitlr,Iratores an Oran mid once.Nat. G.aen<G0.00 r d. hall oe sew ' G' tout.cu.q e. °0 . -~• /cxee Jr, o aj 2'wEEPNcv65C/o'<. m,`` aw1al.<w .K\. c 5 S m[�` �/ / �avar , a r. N AGGE in, < aow ,wowC ` <6 G I, { i2. 2�4cmr� I ! aa1hO (2I _MP - � .Place no oalm. m or odltrartlw•Cr• owl control at Me. coornte rod:.tcolra*Ws. arorsoh Iron ENG / � il rrr/„/ r.r. -�r Iv v :d'ly' ct ri, i .a -woa Structural vv.Der,w<.t Ta❑ �I ��JJJ / '�� < tluwv..inales.shall n°n:mum.un an. I / /F-/G3/iNt �smucr.c•r<cr„p.,IN _— � :6':d ,__,c .! h � 3 1 co-.riNow,s uNew,re 2'(NGr)Ac.PAYNG C.,alien/rrauR„u<r., owco.,oacr Ksoree �emsE a<70a,.:S.e.SC, rarnX.FE \. ` Pbrv:svee. 7H ENAH.AFSOG6'S. bettors prow,owner •l ���— O.,.C. ..,...,......— Groot. oind Vf/yaT Y PAN �N TYP/CAL CURS/Pd V/NG EDGE Cl• d»u,.�..•n,Dan, TYPI CAL DETAIL .m ..w gi !O I 30 S[wtrnenw { 1 G aE-^ tI• �1 2e f'i veeau n < rl.eriwN6 Al.,,, muwi Cont.tm.e (/J \ j 4 � 6.ti nenev.te .t, ,I —f.a. yaraot 4 /fr,NG�S,006 y ..I- 'AIL r I I i I °Cora c.s..atn°en,. 61 • � u..c / f• 1.�� • ._.„\-_.\ —Y.c = i_ • H 0 Mrv/6o O,'\• / . .' . :C2r1. \�/ I a Tvi:N�lN CCEV.......<J ( / ( / :( I tl mw�Pour� I • I r ° <�:": _ , '.� 6,171i [„enN�� _� <E,at :.u<.,no, .I rII'. , e. v,rE..n r 1 - I— Ga acH sY2 or r•<aer¢eP sae<.as \ ( 1 I .10 = rQ fl r °Ne Orrr.�l y '+II °� 41 b' o rvot.�4 aP•uc o.e�A...No \ I �w ra�/. d r co-. 1.---''''''',IT:: a,�55 2 G r.• A• ,.0e G•xi r/rs7 • T.Y �y ;%I .rI p s. • fir, Pdl., i , e'�-._ < N wl ..rey e0ofrrcG,2Taw�.,r \ 1`I I I J t I _ `� _ ITO':: p/„' �° .GAREASr2• r to...A, °< ° //G/ P ec a 1 11 I ✓ v nc �\ .I ,:i ,zcsi Se ccrvc I 1 4 _ t as_i! NiS� `.,I\ .i ° /[UN/G...AEA r /boor. \—Ir1 oral -o• I f< G adt`shr,wcprd,..wawc ;J Ira r PaR.c,NG 'r,�aa,o<cr • o o- i, 5� N I 117 • Z I 1 ` ��` I r� /� \ 1 l • \ \ u • ` suNFH o. \\ 1 1 \ �_ `\ - N u IY 1 r� _ sl _ _cu MARK c`PwicwE:�e>J<�! ' a>.n _I�w I I 'I A '1 rr Acrvr es,11.=^ \ \ \ \\ \ t_______i\© 'I VI \ j n •- .�1 o/`. of 25rrorvc.RT/V6 rvaY ro°/ro<Y.E \ \ I ._.0 / - ' L ' 1 ,I No.676. Sear..,..aw,NE cr N.E \ � \ r fil '�-/^ ../n. + vrN 'oar lrr✓Scr,°.✓o\ \ LaosOY +l ••:^`"'='rCA`i",p .YV /NOEF e G\ \ iNN:\ " //1 r ctil) b if / t • \ c of r°�� • ' tiY \weer"`,... • 2a sr r r°our /5` ... /.�. '- ""`, S/T PLAN N ` .-.._____________\_ __"''' j —.4-5-'./5“.. J- -E'en;roam o Su<E / /0=0• am. ScALS SITE PLAN-NOTES-DETAILS VGp R/✓✓ _ seco.ve C.2 Pali soor,vo uwol o.P.NG reRcw,N. s-s•e, KALASOUNTAS OFFICE DU/LL)/ryG UN/MPS G 70/ 5uNnEr 0,0.N.E. C 1 SECT/ON _/°lliNea,ci.�i Nv'/ ACE.7TN Sr/tFaT Or rtENTON,WI. • • </L f AGRR,S wrap COMPANY MN/5 /L•r<n,r cLWSIJ[r/NG LAG/NEE-AS j�'�MN/6 91/GR NNcx o<u,x.rrLe,,w.Sera, -roc.0.-P_ l 11 t• eJ\� J L1 w1l.PiM- / foL¢ GeA?4U n . . •. J .. ..t; . . .. :.,. . . . EL ,ON.5 d �i-"0.,-1 F,2 KAL 4 50O cTA5 OFF.' =P_=L .= AC a see _' _ ._.:L_• ... _. IIA2 "q - _ ENZ•va..,G` S.J. _ -<.S�F bCl..:.. rlLv J:- - LANDSCAPE GEN.CR4 L NOTES LANCSG.4 PE 5'C HEAD GALE < ,.so CO I>n,n....OW spt111.1•ft Ant.O x cw`r'1•5: r ilw' a•�'•. u.m, x•N. T^ ry �,. rns. sac y:c1. AWACS t Pre not Z • it I silo AI r..on,a�r,.ru...I,1 r ta--,,.r.r..M. .'15w. ¢ .]] I Ie... ,q ruwr n•a.I. Alt, Son. 141 0 ' ] ..r..,an Snrz.: i_ rw. - ..r..,=..1^�. /!� s s., nn e]. 5 @ s.:a c•.v•I'„ .�....r Aaur aeon, .,...nll " x,x ..0 :...w�.,,. , 0 0 > ' pi-:w'us Nut.:w Install. . ra onen,An....ter u....al�.a. lED s c.5 x..n... umn•.,.,,vA.^.I.., s Sv.c. 'r.51.......... wn m�mi, ,�i-w ru..� mx • 6 x , ....:..Im . 3 3'11m5aus e 6 ,xf.,' I.,,,.,,.. a =-I Ia�' Sa„SS:;;a r`'dieeM a +P�.14 :,P a®;. x UI ,.r. ...0 O o \, a �\ 2 o-m art, �i • • 9 )\ Vp iryPI.tN ik Ii R is- 30 so" (/5J E.4srir+G Ti/UY.PrKaaidc En,c e:nr.<.P.r.v N r _J.., III a�reraoces.l..croEc.r,K.�, I :Punt L 1 1 l i .• .m Z i-oil'( !•• •Tc „ /. , ..„, ..T------, - . . /7 (7 ( AI r _ i,Noo,:r. �. ... ( ( ( ( '..t 11 I :i )II: 'L^ W •„ 1 1 P ,.,t'$ . `.' 'Ga Fw..) 'ware (N rno�N, Z I 1 .10 � \ r o _ I �, s.�a M) l N• �� • ii /KER R..J.YN I • \ I !T)pwo N ._:I.\ ' " 'L � ./� .:_ "3-). rro/ ml"fi .. , \ I NJY : \ 1- - \ .14)PHorA .\iSi\ La s '—.'e-\ \ \ I ,� n..I sa • \ I I (4)NRulM uvcm i \ \ \ \ \ ILA*, i I 3 I ;� Im PdT X \• \\ \ \N . P\�\ I \\% C .— ��J•r.... ' •/Ne.eomisg.v, s , \ V} I ;a '" /26./S qd-sr • 0 .\ N 6T �/PriSJ a ((Era) .� Y ' ' CdNDSCA E PLAN ,..1. `I) 21J.ot^5 /S s' /3' so.. / ro=0' ' LANDSCAPE PLAN-NOTES-DET4/GS • I _ . .`ertsc�rRai.w e./coc e!c.......4..., KALA50(JNTAS C'1�F/CE GU/LaNG 3.'E3 C2 cwa, :• )�iIMPkD�� AN' G ¢'N.FT7H STREET 450 9UN9ET F/C5 N.C. y ��'�G RENTON.WI., Pyy._->—" _(C)Jr aaaG /(/W ,�j P.U[PA A61K/9.r/o G,w,p/NY • — n-•- -S I pp 1 II " •Atr !rznio ou,clN ETi9 MY 3 { n•x.+.nity.�vcw I f .YN./G - —.^H/ .c,]...,,,,,et 0 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° o O O 3 . Water 0 4. Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° O 7. Environmental Health ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° 9. Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° o O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o O 14 . Transportation ° o O O 15. Public Services ° O 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 4e490 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE 14\ CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION JULY 28, 1989 APPLICATION NO. : ECF; SA-045-89 APPLICANT: George P. Kalasountas LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2 ,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a roperty which totals �/ appro ' ately .544 acres. .267 a m Mat-sre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review , equired for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 9: 00 a.m. on, July 19, 1989, in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. Comments were also received from METRO, the State Department of Transportation and the State Department of Ecology -- these materials were reviewed by the Committee as well. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received May 5, 1989) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received May 5, 1989) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 2 Findings: 1. The applicant, George P. Kalasountas, has requested site plan approval to allow construction of a 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. The proposed development is intended to replace a commercial structure which is currently on the property -- the existing structure is in poor repair and does not conform to some of the City's development standards for commercial uses. 2 . The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 . 21C, 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- . Significance-Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on June 7, 1989, with the following conditions: a. That the applicant develop a landscaping plan which includes plantings which are of sufficient quantity, size and diversity to provide an attractive view corridor on-site and to provide a visual buffer between adjoining sites. The plan shall be subject to approval by the City's Landscape Planner. b. That the applicant develop a revised site plan including: a) on-site pedestrian-scaled exterior lighting in sufficient quantity and appropriate locations to provide adequate illumination to protect persons and property and b) pedestrian access (raised sidewalks) at appropriate locations to link the structure to the parking area and to adjacent Sunset Boulevard, and of sufficient dimensions (a minimum of 42 inches in width) to enable safe pedestrian passage on-site. Such plans shall be subject to approval by the City's Zoning Administrator. c. That the applicant provide an on-site storm drainage plan, subject to approval by the City's Public Works Department. Note: A downstream drainage release shall be obtained from the downstream property owner to permit operation of the proposed storm drainage system. Such agreement shall be duly recorded with King County and placed on file with the City of Renton. d. That the applicant shall provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes on-site improvements (30 foot driveway, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on the right- of-way frontage) and off-site improvements (e.g. curbs, gutters, sidewalks) on the dedicated right-of-way linking the west side of Sunset Boulevard -- at the site -- to N.E. Seventh Street) , subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division in order to enhance on-site and nearby off-site travel routes. Note: The applicant may seek to defer or waive off- site improvements only, through the Board of Public Works. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 3 e. That the applicant shall provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; b) a plan for hours of operation and hauling subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division and the Police Department; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site and wheel-washing of construction vehicles before they leave the site to control dust and debris, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; and d) a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2, 000,00. f. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to run with the land requiring environmental review and site plan approval in conjunction with development of the R-1 (western) section of the parcel, in order to ensure the adequate protection of the site and neighboring properties. Such review will include, but not be limited to, assessment of impacts upon the natural environment (protection of slopes, flora and fauna) , and environmental health (protection against abutting power lines) . g. ''That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to run with the land requiring environmental review and site plan approval in conjunction with any TVIP redevelopment of the B-i (eastern) section of the parcel, in order to ensure the adequate protection of the site and neighboring properties. Such review will include, but not be limited to, impacts upon the natural environment (protection of slopes, flora and �' \ P �� E fauna) , and environmental health (protection against abutting power lines) . Pj° } 1� ( h In addition to the above, the ERC requested that the applicant voluntarily contribute a sum of $1,800. 00 ($18 per lineal foot) toward the development of a pedestrian link along the west side of Sunset Boulevard from the site to the planned Sunset Park Trail, in order to provide recreational amenities for office building employees and members of the local community. (Note: In the event that the Sunset Park Trail cannot be developed within a five year period, the monies contributed by the proponent will be utilized by the City toward the. development/improvement of other recreational facilities in the vicinity. ) The plan for contribution and management of funds shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney. Note: In conjunction with site plan review, conditions will be established mandating that the applicant address requirements as defined by the Fire Prevention Bureau (e.g. for access, hydrants) , the Building Division (e.g. conformance to Building Code) , and the Planning Division (e.g. for landscaping plans, exterior building materials, lighting fixtures) . 4. Plans for the proposal have been review by all City departments affected by the impt of this proposal. 5. The subject proposal i- no ' consistent with the3 --'141- ` Comprehensive Plan desi. .tion of Medium Density Multi- Family Residential and Greenbelt. 6. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 4 7. The subject site was annexed into the City in October, 1959 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 1795. The property was classified for single-family residential use at that time. The eastern portion of the site was rezoned to Business District (B-1) on October 17, 1961 by the adoption of Ordinance 1918. 8. Land use surrounding the subject site is Single-Family Residential and Medium Density Multi-Family Residential. 9. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review; the plans will require modification to conform to criteria established in the Site Plan Review Ordinance, Section 4-738 and development standards defined in other related regulations/policies (e.g. Landscaping Ordinance, 4-744) . These Site Plan Review criteria are presented below: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The City's Comprehensive Plan Map does designate the property for medium density multi-family residential development. As such, the proposed commercial structure does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan Map. However, the development, as proposed and/or recommended, is generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, which are described as follows: III.A.5. A balance of residential, commercial and industrial areas should be achieved. III.A. 6. The upgrading and/or redevelopment of marginal . . . (sites) . . .should be encouraged. III.B. 8. Development should be harmonious both in intensity and architectural design within a district. III.C. 1. Landscaping which enhances the primary design should be placed around all structures, in the interior of parking lots, and along the periphery of the site. III.C. 3 . Landscaping which is suitable for screening and buffering should be provided between use areas. V.A. l. Commercial . . . (uses) . . . should only be allowed to the extent of short term needs. V.A. 7. Commercial . . . (uses) . . . should be compatible with adjacent land uses. V.B.5. Developments should be designed and maintained to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent properties. The project, as proposed and/or recommended, is designed and located on the site in a manner which will ensure compatibility between this development and neighbors residential development. I' ?I, Finally, commercial activities are perm' ted as a principal use on the subject property based upon and use map designation; the proposed office complex has been proposed/recommended to be consistent with development standards for commercial uses. (See Section 9.b. for further discussion) . Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 5 b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The planned office structure has generally been proposed by r1 the proponent and/or is recommended by staff to be designed to conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements for Commercial Use (4-711) ; Parking and Loading (4-2204) , and Landscaping (4-744) . The development as proposed meets lot coverage, setback, height and bulk requirements. Parking and loading areas will need to be revised to comply with Code requirements in order to provide an appropriate number of parking spaces while permitting adequate access (vehicular and pedestrian) , maneuvering area and landscaping islands. A revised landscaping plan will need to be provided to include the required amount of area at the boundaries and in the interior of the property, in keeping with the Commercial Use Ordinance, the Landscaping Ordinance, and the Site Plan Review Ordinance. The basic requirements for this plan were established in conjunction with Environmental Review (See Section 3 above) . (Note: All required amenities -- e.g. parking, access routes, landscaping -- must be provided within the boundaries of the section of the property which is zoned for commercial use. No modification of or development to the section of the parcel which is zoned for residential use may be made in conjunction with this development) . c. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to surrounding properties and uses; Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses have been identified by staff in the areas of housing, aesthetics, traffic circulation, noise, light and glare and public services/utilities: The Environmental Review Committee recommended conditions (See Section 3) to address anticipated impacts in the above- defined categories. Similarly, conditions established in conjunction with this site plan review are intended to mitigate impacts in these categories from the proposed development. ' Cier,A--i u1/4-,-'-'1LA---3 sk--° R-9--r---'"--;"" Pr-L-5". 1) Housing ' -o.D LA)-1132-7cal ej'-' 1\b,_„,tae The subject property is bo�'nded to the north ands o the eastr ` . --- 14 (across Sunset Boulevard) by residential development; dck—�. ��11/ � additionally, here is potential for future development of 11Pd6111r\ the western s ction of the subject site with residential development, based upon the R-1 zoning on that section of the parcel. , City regulations and policies mandate that the �� proposed commercial development be designed and sited to be / ‘ I compatible with existing and possible future residential � , uses. The proponent has generally addressed these '� regulations/policies -- see further discussion concerning h0111 i /P � 11 / structural design in Section b.2. below. ioit 2) Aesthetics '' 1 The applicant, working with staff, has generally endeavored to make the proposed office structure tezack...lakritttkrig compatible in design, scale and size to surrounding residential development. The structure is proposed to be one-story in height, and to be finished with white stucco If Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 6 siding and with hipped gray composition roofing to further increase similarity with the nearby residential developments. Landscaping will provide an attractive visual barrier and buffer light/glare between the site and neighboring properties; improved pedestrian access and lighting will provide safer passage for pedestrians. Additionally, the applicant's participation in providing linkage to the Sunset Trail will facilitate the enjoyment of this Trail by community members, visitors and employees. 3) Traffic Circulation Off-site traffic circulation impacts are evaluated below in Section 9. f. of this report. 4) Noise, light and glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated in Section 9.h. of this report. 5) Public Services/Utilities Public services/utilities impacts are evaluated in Section 9 . i. of this report. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Potential impacts to the site have been identified by staff with respect to housing, aesthetics, noise, light and glare, traffic, public services/utilities, natural environment, environmental health and earth: 1) Housing The planned location of an office building upon the eastern portion of the site will preclude residential development here. Note is made of the fact that this section of the property, with its current commercial zoning, would not permit residential use. Rezoning of this portion of the site to R-3, medium density multi-family use could potentially permit a four unit complex on the site; rezoning of the entire site to R-3 could potentially permit the development of two additional units (pro rated to address fthe steeply sloped greenbelt area) . While residential development is generally seen to be desirable in this area oft e City, this particular site, as a whole, is not well- suited r residences because of the sloped areas, the presence o -- power lines, and the proximity to a major intersection (which creates traffic, noise, light and glare impacts to the site. ) v4I4' 2) Aesthetics The site plan, as proposed by the applicant and/or as modified by staff, provides an integrated design theme and a pleasant, efficient environment for employees and visitors. The structure is proposed to have attractive, durable exterior facades. There will be ample on-site parking. The tructure will be linked to parking areas and to the adjacent right-of-way with pedestrian pathways. Open areas and landscaping will be designed to improve the appearance of the site and to provide on-site amenities for employees (e.g. a seating area, view corridors) . As the slope and ` natural vegetation present on the western section of the property will be retained, that area will also provide a " view corridor. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 7 3) Traffic Circulation Off-site traffic circulation impacts are evaluated below in Section 9. f. of this report. 4) Noise, light and glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated below in Section 9.h. of this report. 5) Public Services/Utilities Public services/utilities impacts are evaluated below in Section 9. i. 6) Natural Environment As noted previously, the western sect}}'- n of the subject property is steeply sloped and o e 4d with natural vegetation. The applicant is no planning to develop that western section of the proper % The presence of the greenbelt is acknowledged, how-ver, through judicious location of structures, locati•, of landscaped areas, and development of a storm drainage management system on the eastern portion of the property 7) Environmental Health As noted previously, the western periphery of the property is developed with Puget Power lines. These lines currently generate 115 kV of power. Future plans may include conversion of those lines to generate up to 230 kV of power according to representatives of Puget Power. The proponent has designed the project so that electromagnetic intensity to the office structure does not exceed 100 milligaus in order to protect human health and safety. 8) Earth Portions of the western section of the property are steeply sloped, and thus subject to impacts from erosion from construction and/or operation of the proposed office development (e.g. changing of slope configuration from soil movement, flooding from run-off) . Mitigation of likely impacts is discussed in Section 9. i. below. e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The planned office project is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since the development is proposed/recommended to be designed to: 1) improve the attractiveness and efficiency of use on the site; and 2) be compatible with uses on neighboring properties. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; 1) Off-site Based upon ITE reports, staff anticipate that the proposed project will generate approximately 85 ADWVTE, including employee travel -- 7.7 trips x an estimated 10 employees -- plus visitors. The anticipated number of trips can be Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 8 accommodated on adjacent Sunset Boulevard and other nearby roadways without reducing levels of service or otherwise having a significant impact upon vehicle/pedestrian circulation with mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee for this development. (See Section 3) . 2) On-site Applicant proposals and City recommendations for access and circulation routes on the site -- including number and location of parking spaces, ingress/egress routes, pedestrian linkage, exterior illumination -- are also designed to protect pedestrian safety and to enhance vehicle circulation. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed development has been designed and sited so that the structure is well-separated from neighboring residential developments to the north and to the east (across Sunset Boulevard) . As previously noted, property to the south is vacant and undevelopable. The western portion of the subject parcel, which is vacant and zoned for single-family residential use, will be required to undergo environmental and site plan review if development is proposed -- the planned office building is sited in a manner which results in very limited impact to light and air on the residential portion of the property; there is ample space on the western section of the parcel to develop a single-family structure which is well-away from the office project. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthful conditions; 1) Construction Construction activities will generate some noise, dust and debris to the site and the surrounding area. Mitigation measures recommended in conjunction with environmental review (See Section 3 . e. above) are sufficient to address impacts upon adjacent residential ,- developments and rights-of-way from construction of the proposed improvements. 7 '7 2) Operation The proposed office development -- which is planned to 2 employ approximately ten persons -- is anticipated to xperience so mpac s, an t and glare wk impacts fro the abutting right-of-wa it is also ly(��� ��j' anticipated to crea no se, fight and glare 00 impacts upon the surrounding single-family and multi- l I family residential units. iA , fioirl To mitigate noise impacts to the site, staff will r' recommend that the structure be constructed in a manner ��� which limits interior noise levels to 50 dBA. Light and glare impacts can be mitigated through judicious /�-`ev selection and placement of exterior lighting and of !" 0 -� plantings. A� )/J Noise impacts from the development to abutting residences are not anticipated to be more significant than noise generated from the adjacent Sunset Boulevard. Those impacts which do occur are likely to be notable only at the beginning and the end of the business day as employees enter and leave the site. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 9 Similarly, light and glare impacts from traffic are not expected to be substantially different from the type and level of impacts now present in the area. Landscaping should serve to provide a visual barrier against light/glare between the subject site and abutting properties. Judicious placement and direction of exterior illumination on the site should further reduce off-site light/glare. impacts. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Development of the proposed office complex, with recommended environmental conditions (See Section 3) and land use mitigation measures is not generally expected to create an undue burden on public services and facilities in the area. The site is adequately served by utilities lines (water mains, sanitary sewers) with connection requirements as stipulated by City Ordinance and Code. Neither the Police Department nor the Fire Prevention Bureau has indicated that the proposed facility would place a major burden on their respective services if code provisions (e.g. signage, lighting) are met. Storm drainage management can be achieved for this site. However, because of terrain characteristics (the eastern portion of the site, which is proposed for office development at this time, is relatively flat and level; the western portion of the site is steeply sloped) there are some special requirements for systems development and implementation. Staff has established conditions in conjunction with the above-described Determination of Non- Significance (See Section 3.c. and 3 .e. ) to ensure protection of the site as a whole during construction and operation of the proposed office development, with particular attention to protection of the sloped area against erosion or run-off impacts from the developed/impervious portion of the site. These measures are anticipated to serve, as well, to protect neighboring properties from impacts related to the proposed development. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight The proposed facility is expected to have a generally positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing redevelopment of an existing office use which is in poor repair and by making efficient use of a property which is convenient to nearby arterial streets. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on were: ' a. Placement of covenants on the site to ensure appropriate future utilization of the commercial (B-1) and single-family (R-1) portion of the subject property. /04p ti ' ,b. Storm drainage management. . c. Aesthetics. Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 10 d. Traffic. e. Noise, light and glare. 3 . The proposal complies with land use designation and with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Ob . fives. It does -1not comply with the Comprehensive n-de ±gn ' on of Mediu ) Density Multi-Family Residential nd Greenbelt. / Decision: p/ The site plan for the Kalasountas Office Building, file no. 0/ /di ECF;SA 045-89 is subject to the following conditions: , 1. That the applicant comply with the conditions established in U11 conjunction with the Determination of Non-Significance ,t issued on June 7, 1989 . These conditions must be addressed prior to the issuance of site preparation and/or building / permits. 2 . That the applicant develop a signage •la-, subject to the approval of the Planning Divi and the Building Division, prior to the issuance of a building pe' •.it. (Note: The revised site plans and landscaping p ;ns must restrict the proposed structure and all required amenities o that portion of the property which is zoned for commercial develoament. ) For the purpose of these decisions, the terms "should" a • �� "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" considered discretionary. ) *(/'1,G Notes to Applicant: 4fri I An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold" " ' the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or l�v for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work ��,� required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, 4 may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper Ai permits. ORDERED this 28th day of July 1989, on behalf of the Site Plan M Review Committee. AO Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this day of , 19 , to the parties of record: Paul Panagakis 341 Skinner Building Seattle, WA 98101 George Kalasountas 701 Sunset Blvd. NE Renton, WA 98055 Site Plan Review Committee Report and Decision July 28, 1989 Page 11 TRANSMITTED this day of , 19 , to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Larry Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before , 19 . Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on , 19 , accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. �$ CITY OF RENTON BUILDING Ft ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM DATE : September 7 , 1989 TO: Maxine Motor, City Clerk FROM: Sandra Seeger , Planning SS RE: George P . Kalasountas SA-045-89 With this memo I am transmitting the above referenced file to your office. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION JULY 31, 1989 APPLICATION NO. : ECF; SA-045-89 APPLICANT: George P. Kalasountas LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. SUMMARY OF REQUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately . 267 acre section of a property which totals approximately . 544 acres. The .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately . 277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review was required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 9: 00 a.m. on, July 19, 1989, in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was ,conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. Comments were also received from METRO, the State Department of Transportation and the State Department of Ecology -- these materials were reviewed by the Committee as well. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received May 5, 1989) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received May 5, 1989) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Site Plan Review Commi :e Report and Decision July 31, 1989 Page 2 Findings: 1. The applicant, George P. Kalasountas, has requested site plan approval to allow construction of a 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. The proposed development' is intended to replace a commercial structure which is currently on the property -- the existing structure is in poorl repair and does not conform to some of the City's development standards for commercial uses. 2 . The applicant's file containing the' application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, ,the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, andother pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3 . Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 . 21C, 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on June 7, 1989, with the following conditions: a. That the applicant develop a landscaping plan which includes plantings which are of sufficient quantity, size and diversity to provide an attractive view corridor on-site and to provide a visual buffer between adjoining sites. The plan shall be subject to approval by the City's Landscape Planner. b. That the applicant develop a revised site plan including: a) on-site pedestrian-scaled exterior lighting in sufficient quantity and appropriate locations to provide adequate illumination to protect persons and property and b) pedestrian access (raised sidewalks) at appropriate locations to link the structure to the parking area and to adjacent Sunset Boulevard, and of sufficient dimensions (a minimum of 42 inches in width) to enable safe pedestrian passage on-site. Such plans shall be subject to approval by the City's Zonipg Administrator`. c. That the applicant provide an on-site storm drainage plan, subject to approval by the City's Public Works Department. Note: A downstream drainage release shall be obtained from the downstream property owner to permit operation of the proposedstorm drainage system. Such agreement shall be duly recorded with King County and placed on file with the City of Renton. d. That the applicant shall provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes on-site improvements (30 foot driveway, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on the right- of-way frontage) and off-site improvements (e.g. curbs, gutters, sidewalks) on the dedicated right-of-way linking the west side of Sunset Boulevard -- at the site -- to N.E.1Seventh Street) , subject to the approval of the. Traffic Engineering Division in order to enhance on-site and nearby off-site travel routes. Note: The applicant may seek to defer or waive off- site improvements only, through the Board of Public Works. e. That the applicant shall provide a construction management plan' including: a) an erosion control plan subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; b) a plan for hours of operation and hauling subject to Site Plan Review Comic ':e Report and Decision July 31, 1989 Page 3 the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division and the Police Department; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site and wheel-washing of construction vehicles before, they leave the site to control dust and debris, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; and d) a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2, 000,00. f. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to run with the land requiring environmental review and site plan approval in conjunction with development of the R-1 (western) section of the parcel, in order to ensure the adequate protection of the site and neighboring properties. . Such review will include, but not be limited to, assessment of impacts upon the natural environment (protection of slopes, flora and fauna) , and environmental health (protection against abutting power lines) . g. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to run with the land requiring environmental review and site plan approval in conjunction with any redevelopment of the B-1 (eastern) section of the parcel, in order to ensure the adequate protection of the site and neighboring properties. Such review will include, but not be limited to, impacts upon the natural environment (protection of slopes, flora and fauna) , and environmental health (protection against abutting power lines) . h. In addition to the above, the ERC requested that the applicant voluntarily contribute a sum of $1,800. 00 ($18 per lineal foot) toward the development of a pedestrian link along the west side of Sunset Boulevard from the site to the planned Sunset Park Trail, in order to provide recreational amenities for office building employees and members of the local community. (Note: In the event that the Sunset Park Trail cannot be developed within a five year period, the monies contributed by the proponent will be utilized by the City toward the development/improvement of other recreational facilities in the vicinity. ) The plan for contribution and management of funds shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney. Note: In conjunction with site plan review, conditions will be established mandating that the applicant address requirements as defined by the Fire Prevention Bureau (e.g. for access, hydrants) , the Building Division (e.g. conformance to Building Code) , and the Planning Division (e.g. for landscaping plans, exterior building materials, lighting fixtures) . 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject property is designated for Medium Density Multi- Family Use and as Greenbelt on the Comprehensive Plan. The subject proposal is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use which gives would customarily restrict the site to residential use, however, the planned office building does comply with the existing land use zoning designation of Commercial Use. The proposal is consistent with the Greenbelt designation, as no development is planned for the area so designated. Site Plan Review Commi -!e Report and Decision July 31, 1989 ' Page 4 6. The site plan as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 7. The subject site was annexed into the City in October, 1959 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 1795. The property was classified for single-family residential use at that time. The eastern portion of the site was rezoned to Business District (B-1) on October 17, 1961 by the adoption of Ordinance 1918 . 8 . Land use surrounding the subject site is Single-Family Residential and Medium Density Multi-Family Residential. 9 . The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review; the plans will require modification to conform to criteria established in the Site Plan Review Ordinance, Section 4-738 and development standards defined in other related regulations/policies (e.g. Landscaping Ordinance, 4-744) . These Site Plan Review criteria are presented below: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The City's Comprehensive Plan Map does designate the property for medium density multi-family residential development. As such, the proposed commercial structure does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan Map. However, the development, as proposed and/or recommended, is generally consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, which are described as follows: III.A.5. A balance of residential, commercial and industrial areas should be achieved. III.A. 6. The upgrading and/or redevelopment of marginal . . (sites) . . . should be encouraged. III.B.8 . Development should be harmonious both in intensity and architectural design within a district. III.C. 1. Landscaping which enhances the primary design should be placed around all structures, in the interior of parking lots, and along the periphery of the site. III.C.3 . Landscaping which is suitable for screening and buffering should be provided between use areas. V.A. 1. Commercial . . . (uses) . . . should only be allowed to the extent of short term needs. V.A.7. Commercial . . . (uses) . . . should be compatible with adjacent land uses. V.B.5. Developments should be designed and maintained to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent properties. The project, as proposed and/or recommended, is designed and located on the site in a manner which will ensure compatibility between this development and neighboring residential development. Finally, commercial activities are permitted as a principal use on the subject property based upon the Zoning Land Use Map designation; the proposed office complex has been proposed/recommended to be consistent with development standards for commercial uses. (See Section 9.b. for further discussion) . Site Plan Review Commi a-e Report and Decision - July 31, 1989 Page 5 b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The planned office structure has generally been proposed by the proponent and/or is recommended by staff to be designed to conform to Zoning, Ordinance requirements for Commercial Use (4-711) ; Parking', and Loading (4-2204) , and Landscaping (4-744) . The development as proposed meets lot coverage, setback, height and bulk requirements. Parking and loading areas will need to be revised to comply with Code requirements in order to provide an appropriate number of parking spaces while permitting adequate access (vehicular and pedestrian) , maneuvering area and, landscaping islands. A revised landscaping plan will need to be provided to include the required, amount of area at the boundaries and in the interior of the property, in keeping with the Commercial Use Ordinance, the Landscaping Ordinance, and the Site Plan Review Ordinance. The basic requirements for this plan were established in conjunction with Environmental Review (See Section 3 above) . (Note: All required amenities -- e.g. parking, access routes, landscaping -- must be provided within the boundaries of the section of the property which is zoned for commercial use. No modification of or development to the section of the parcel which is zoned for residential use may be made in conjunction with this development) . c. . Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to surrounding properties and uses; Potential impacts to the surrounding environment and to neighboring land uses have been identified by staff in the areas of housing, aesthetics, traffic circulation, noise, light and glare and public services/utilities: The Environmental Review Committee recommended conditions (See Section 3) to address anticipated impacts in the above- defined categories. ; Similarly, conditions established in conjunction with this site plan review are intended to mitigate impacts in these categories from the proposed development. 1) Housing The subject property; is bounded to the north and to the east (across Sunset Boulevard) by residential development; additionally, there is potential for future development of the western section of the subject site with residential development, based upon the R-1 zoning on that section of the parcel. (Note: The applicant has no immediate plans to develop residential use on that R-1 section, but wishes to retain the opportunity to do so at some unspecified future date. Site Plan Review Commi,' :e Report and Decision July 31, 1989 ' Page 6 City regulations and policies mandate that the proposed commercial development be designed and sited to be compatible with existing and possible future residential uses. The proponent, has generally addressed these regulations/policies! -- see further discussion concerning structural design in Section b.2 . below. 2). Aesthetics The applicant, working with staff, has generally endeavored to make the proposed office structure office building compatible in design, scale and size to surrounding residential development. The structure is proposed to be one-story in height, , and to be finished with white stucco siding and with hipped gray composition roofing to further increase similarity with the nearby residential developments. Landscaping will provide an attractive visual barrier and buffer light/glare between the site and neighboring properties; improved pedestrian access and lighting will provide safer passage for pedestrians. Additionally, the applicant's participation in providing linkage to the Sunset. Trail will facilitate the enjoyment of this Trail by community members, visitors and employees. 3) Traffic Circulation Off-site traffic circulation impacts are evaluated below in Section 9. f. of this report. 4) Noise, light and glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated in Section 9.h. of this report. 5) Public Services/Utilities Public services/utilities impacts are evaluated in Section 9. i. of this report. , d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; Potential impacts to the site have been identified by staff with respect to housing, aesthetics, noise, light and glare, traffic, public services/utilities, natural environment, environmental health and earth: 1) Housing The planned location of an office building upon the eastern portion of the sitewill preclude residential development here. Note is made of the fact that this section of the property, with its current commercial zoning, would not permit residential use. Rezoning of this portion of the site to R-3 , medium density multi-family use could potentially permit a, four unit complex on the site; rezoning of the entire site to R-3 could potentially permit the development of two additional units (pro rated to address the steeply sloped greenbelt area) . While residential development is generally seen to be desirable in this area of the City, this particular site, as a whole, is not well- suited for residences because of the sloped areas, the presence of nearby power lines, and the proximity to a major intersection (which creates traffic, noise, light and glare impacts to the site. ) Site Plan Review Commit :e Report and Decision July 31, 1989 Page 7 2) Aesthetics The site plan, as proposed by the applicant and/or as modified by staff, provides an integrated design theme and a pleasant, efficient environment for employees and visitors. The structure is proposed to have attractive, durable exterior facades. There will be ample on-site parking. The structure will be linked to parking areas and to the adjacent right-of-way with pedestrian pathways. Open areas and landscaping will, be designed to improve the appearance of the site and to provide on-site amenities for employees (e.g. a seating area, view corridors) . As the slope and natural vegetation present on the western section of the property will be retained, that area will also provide a view corridor. 3) Traffic Circulation Off-site traffic circulation impacts are evaluated below in Section 9 . f. of this report. 4) Noise, light and glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated below in Section 9 .h. of this report. 5) Public Services/Utilities Public services/utilities impacts are evaluated below in Section 9. i. 6) Natural Environment As noted previously, the western section of the subject property is steeply sloped and covered with natural vegetation. The applicant is not planning to develop that western section of the property at this time. The presence of the greenbelt is acknowledged, however, through judicious location of structures, location of landscaped . areas, and development of a storm drainage management system on the eastern portion of the property. 7) Environmental Health As noted previously, the western periphery of the property is developed with Puget Power lines. These lines currently generate 115 kV of power. Future plans may include conversion of those lines to generate up to 230 kV of power according to representatives of Puget Power. The proponent has designed the project so that electromagnetic intensity to the office structure does not exceed 100 milligaus in order to protect human health and safety. 8) Earth Portions of the western section of the property are steeply sloped, and thus subject to impacts from erosion from construction and/or operation of the proposed office development (e.g. changing of slope configuration from soil movement, flooding from run-off) . Mitigation of likely impacts is discussed in Section 9. i. below. Site Plan Review Commi; Report and Decision - July 31, 1989 ' Page 8 e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The planned office project is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since the development is proposed/recommended to be designed to: 1) improve the attractiveness and efficiency of use on the site; and 2) be compatible with uses on neighboring properties. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; 1) Off-site Based upon ITE reports, staff anticipate that the proposed project will generate approximately 85 ADWVTE, including employee travel -- 7.7 trips x an estimated 10 employees -- plus visitors. The anticipated number of trips can be accommodated on adjacent Sunset Boulevard and other nearby roadways without reducing levels of service or otherwise having a significant impact upon vehicle/pedestrian circulation with mitigation measures established by the Environmental Review Committee for this development. (See Section 3) . 2) On-site Applicant proposals and City recommendations for access and circulation routes on the site -- including number and location of parking spaces, ingress/egress routes, pedestrian linkage, exterior illumination -- are also designed to protect pedestrian safety and to enhance vehicle circulation. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The proposed development has been designed and sited so that the structure is well-separated from neighboring residential developments to the north and to the east (across Sunset Boulevard) . As previously, noted, property to the south is vacant and undevelopable. The western portion of the subject parcel, which is vacant and zoned for single-family residential use, will be required to undergo environmental and site plan review if development is proposed -- the planned office building is sited in a manner which results in very limited impact to light and air on the residential portion of the property; there is ample space on the western section of the parcel to develop a single-family structure which is well-away from the office project. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthful conditions; 1) Construction Construction activities will generate some noise, dust and debris to the site and the surrounding area. Mitigation measures recommended in conjunction with environmental review (See Section 3 . e. above) are sufficient to address impacts upon adjacent residential developments and rights-of-way from construction of the proposed improvements. 2) Operation The proposed office development -- which is planned to employ approximately ten persons -- is anticipated to create some noise, light and glare impacts upon the surrounding single-family and multi-family residential Site Plan Review Commie :e Report and Decision July 31, 1989 Page 9 units, based upon design/use (e.g. on-site lighting, employee parking) with those residential developments. The project is also anticipated to experience some noise impacts, and light and glare impacts from the Sunset Boulevard, abutting right-of-way. Noise impacts from the development to abutting residences are not anticipated to be more significant than noise generated from the adjacent Sunset Boulevard. Those impacts which do occur are likely to be notable only at the beginning and the end of the business day as employees enter and leave the site. Similarly, light and glare impacts from traffic are not expected to be substantially different from the type and level of impacts now present in the area. Landscaping should serve to provide a visual barrier against light/glare between the subject site and abutting properties. Judicious placement and direction of exterior illumination on the site should further reduce off-site light/glare impacts. To mitigate noise impacts to the site, staff will recommend that the structure be constructed in a manner which limits interior noise levels to 50 dBA. Light and glare impacts can be mitigated through judicious selection and placement of exterior lighting and of plantings. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Development of the proposed office complex, with recommended environmental conditions (See Section 3) and land use mitigation measures is not generally expected to create an undue burden on public services and facilities in the area. The site is adequately served by utilities lines (water mains, sanitary sewers) with connection requirements as stipulated by City Ordinance and Code. Neither the Police Department nor the Fire Prevention Bureau has indicated that the proposed facility would place a major burden on their respective services if code provisions (e.g. signage, lighting) are met. Storm drainage management can be achieved for this site. However, because of terrain characteristics (the eastern portion of the site, which is proposed for office development at this time, is relatively flat and level; the western portion of the site is steeply sloped). there are some special requirements for systems development and implementation. Staff has established conditions in conjunction with the above-described Determination of Non- Significance (See Section 3 .c. and 3 .e. ) to ensure protection of the site as a whole during construction and operation of the proposed office development, with particular attention to protection of the sloped area against erosion or run-off impacts from the developed/impervious portion of the site. These measures are anticipated to serve, as well, to protect neighboring properties from impacts related to the proposed development. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight The proposed facility is expected to have a generally positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing redevelopment of an existing Site Plan Review Commie Report and Decision July 31, 1989 . ' Page 10 office use which is in poor repair and by making efficient use of a property which is convenient to nearby arterial streets. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on were: a. Aesthetics. b. Storm drainage management. c. Traffic. d. Noise, light and glare. e. Compatibility of proposed use with City regulations, with property characteristics, and with features of abutting properties. 3 . The proposal complies with land use designation and with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives. It does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Multi-Family Residential. It does comply with the Greenbelt designation, as no development is located in the greenbelt. Decision: The site plan for the Kalasountas Office Building, file no. ECF;SA 045-89 is subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with the conditions established in conjunction with the Determination of Non-Significance issued on June 7, 1989 . These conditions must be addressed prior to the issuance of site preparation and/or building permits. 2 . That the applicant develop a signage plan, subject to the approval of the Planning Division and the Building Division, prior to the issuance of a building permit. (Note: The revised site plans and landscaping plans must restrict the proposed structure and all required amenities to that portion of the property which is zoned for commercial development. ) For the purpose of. these decisions, the terms "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. ) Notes to. Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. Site Plan Review Commi; le Report and Decision truly 31, 1989 ' Page 11 ORDERED this 28th day of July 1989, on behalf of t 'te Plan Review Committee. (711:71401 ' Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this 31st day of July, 1989, to the parties of record: Paul Panagakis 341 Skinner Building Seattle, WA 98101 George Kalasountas 701 Sunset Blvd. NE Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 31st day of July, 1989, to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Larry Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REQUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before, August 14 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011 (B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 p.m. on August 14 1989, accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • • • • I. les*eel Looetrese•Well en,Ilene..we i. te .,.,,LE .3.Amnon.Snows es ass wee wet.wee ".•^.• c7%ru4 7 . ____ _, . ,,I.M61,••01.6 5 er0,.. le•us els,el ma eset s wen el sews \ .T tMwitt.pY4/,tt OVIM J. 3. Wesel sneezy.well owl.,ell...row we &sense.we eessest wall es r \ 1 <n � � Pw<r_ ..wrt•.va rnu �i.•L•1 ra.weM l Ye . _ u.,...ia b.lo.�.. /.oa �0 } >fr. roi:rr cuc.,.„,,,,pp,_ /.*ass- -)> wws I • r:•"ereemisess ewe twos,el sett. \ \ :_/�-•--, �/// �r� -- � �` • 7. All[wenn wens es et•Deo Well iv 41.nos sense Mee ranee awes sem Snow sees • \ M v` J 0 I `,�NraJ'..r.c." rpvcr)wr..L.: cw • 'O . 11 J I covrS o�..rt.2 r.� oNruNcrcrutwed • .rvn ' 7O..a•L..sa...vr.x a c. .a..L•,..ewes. \ nr-.rsva'c. >xc«.,<.v.�nFrsuc-�. ...... .. V�ly47r,LAN I�"' TXP/CAL CURB/PAV/NG EDGE C•/ OA O Iwo..'�� TYPICAL JETA/Ln _ r�,a1-L.. , >S Y./owl) r Jo' /G \• .. .• >• „• _rA.r r.aT.c..wvs I Nv (_ a.a.�.u.w.L..w... a rat • • • i . > Nab�.'a°f / csv.ae. •• yl L L.. O •C/ t•aw>l Avr o • .CONK li,------/.-- / / �r e / • ,� ,!\rt..�-- d 1 I r/L c,.r..,AS icr�r�y V. / // I ( / It • v� I'� f. \ ° I .43.°• tr. .wcr ..ne.. I ( \ \ we - Id _ a�MAC,. • . \ `` B �.1 T.I . J.rr.r.,' .unT .....,,...ii5 Z ; rgwrr,N . c Dd s � ,✓ I r o r.w,� ..TOOOD ( \ i�istuF-oc +��I • ` / I " evra...a• ' l I '� I �\ rN r�.1. a�a..Lf.l \ \ \ \ ✓I �..� of u -. I ,cic as 1 ( •\ ,I • • ..--\1.-\ k \ -\\\ \\ \ \ N., \ I --- - I o :1 ,:: ° u • • \ • \ \ N\\. . .a� • N.\ a� 'mot= R • `�. (ra• m.-• � \ i _ ,a��i�. • f 45 �. \cus,° �.\{\.>-a•s _ �s �N /TE PGA/Y . 1 - `""" •\ a x.� /L'0 0 6. " nT SITE PG A N-NOTES-DE TA/LS \\`+ � NOTES: • we ns P. e.,an..a uw•o.c.r...a OR ..../ KAGASDUNTAS QaF/CE LYJ/L.4'/YG 1 • 70/ SLINSEY tftv0.N.C. ll'NREryTON,wI• SECT/On/ !J/a�o..�c,,i..•i N KE.%TN STitEET ^r ut p.w.rr,c/y...o ca«vw�vr Cl - rcww3.11 ../NG c�.aeEnS / 75 NM./6 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ' DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ' RENTON;WASHINGTON 'The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has'issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following pro- jects under'the'authority of the Renton Municipal Code.The following Applicants AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ;have GSA/FAA OFFICEF mitigation process: GSA/FAA BUILDING(ECF;SA- 030.89) Audrey Benner �"Applivant seeks site plan approval for a five ,being first duly sworn on oath states story/199,000 square foot(177,000 square that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the feet of leasable space)office building on an 8.8'acre parcel'in an,Office Park (OP) zone.'The property is located on Lind Ave- VALLEY DAILY NEWS nue and 16th.StTER HAZARDOUS' MATERIALS CHECK- ' • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition POINT(ECF-041-89) �:�;.• .., ,,Applidant seeks to consolidate several now- 't functioning hazardous materials receiving Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers areas by'relocating all materials to a single are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six checkpoint w l be composed'existing building. The checkpoint will be of two adja- months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published kcent sections including:a)an'Indoor facility in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King .of 1800,square feet, and b) an outside is County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal �located'at�corner of 4.W.e property r 8 eet newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for and Lind Ave. S.W + . ;:' i King County. KALASOUNTAS•OFFICE 'BUILDING (ECF; SA-045439) • Applicant seeks site plan approval for the The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition 'construction of a 2,700 square foot office Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition building.on an approximately, .267, acre (and not in ! section of a property which totals approxi- supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers mately,.544 acres.That,.267 acre section, during the below stated period. The annexed notice a on the eastern`portion of the property, is zoned B-1-and Is currently developed with Public Notice 'a small (approximately.600 square foot) • office.building.The western section of the property(approximately.277 acre)is zoned was published on July 3 , 1989 R5 2 6 4 R-1; no'development is proposed for this ,residential section at this time.The proper- • ty is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the -•--•Fuither information regarding this action sum of$ 44 .22 is available in the Community Development rDepartment, Municipal Building, Renton, r'Washington;235-2550.}This Determination b is FINAL."There is a.14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on July 17, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's )fearing;Examiner, Municipal Building, 200:Mill Avenue South, Renton, thWashington.—An appeal must state clearly, 19 July Subscribed and sworn before me this day of 19 8 9 in writing,why.the Determination should be • revised and must be accompanied by a . non-refundable$75.00 filing fee.- 'Published cJuly'3, .1989 Valley Daily News R5264 ;st .1, Not y Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicants have completed a mitigation process: GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199,000 square foot (177,000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. The property is located on Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECKPOINT ECF-041-89 Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single checkpoint in an existing building. The checkpoint will be composed of two adjacent sections including: a) an indoor facility of 1800 square feet, and b) an outside facility of 1600 square feet. The property is located at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. The property is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on July 17, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non- refundable'$75.00 filing fee. Published: July 3, 1989 N OT C E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ti APPLICATION NO ECF-045-89, SA-045-89 APPLICANT PAUL PANAGAKI S/GEORGE KALASOUNTAS KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED ACTION Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a one story 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-I and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR AD tnS'§the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 PAW, 17 , 1 9R9 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • • • NOTICE • ENVIRONMENTAL • . •DECLARATION • • • • • • APPLICATION NOECF-045-89, SA-045-89 • • APPLICANT PAUL PANAGAKIS/GEORGE KALASOUNTAS KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED ACTION Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a one story 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals • approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned I)-I and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR AI DhES the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-I; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION • DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS • PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER • BY 5:00 PtMy, 17, iqgq FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • CERTIFICATION HEREBY CERTIFY THAT • • COPIES OF IIIE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN ',I_ACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON CONSPICUOUS • • ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, e • • Notory Prrbl(c, - rt end or the State of Washington • resldir n dny of on the:J SIGNED : t ti 4 OmETRD Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 • l;li'Y 6i:i'iET ON June 27, 1989 ( r1� Environmental Review Committee c/o Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : ECF-045-89 Paul Panagakis/George Kalasountqas Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities or public transportation services. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4823 f • • • ORDINANCE NO. /q/X AN' ORDINANCE OF THE, CITY OF RENTON, ,WASHINGTON, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION'OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF, RENTON FROM • GENERAL CLASSIFICATION. DISTRICT (G) to, BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) WHEREAS under, Chapter VII., Title IV (Building Re uila'tions) , of Ordinance , No. 1628, known as the "Code of General Ordinances of the City of Renton" as amended and the maps adopted in conjunction -therewith, the properties hereinbelow described have heretofore been zoned as General Classification District (G) ; and . WHEREAS. under the provisions of the aforesaid Ordinance, as amended, a pro] petition for. change of. zone classification of the hereinbelow described property hi been filed with .the-City Clerk of the City of Renton on or about July 5, 1961, whicl petition was then duly submitted to the Planning Commission for investigation, stud: and public hearing, and a public hearing having been held .thereon on September 27, 1961 in the Council Chambers of the City of Renton, -all- pursuant to notice of hearii duly published and posted as provided_ by law; said Planning Commission having duly considered'and studied said petition, and having made certain recommendhtions in . connection therewith; 'and having heard all parties- appearing in support thereof or : opposition thereto; now therefore'- BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF- RENTON, AS FOLLOWS .SECTION I.: The following described property in the city of Renton is herel rezoned to Business- District 03-11 as specified below; the City Engineer and the Planning' Director are hereby authorized and directed to change the- maps of .the Zonii Ordinance of the City .of Renton to evidence this rezoning; apd7property being -desci as follows: • er / t , The-East 75 feet of Tract 1 and.-South half of Tract 2, Harries Garden Home Tracts, 'all located in Renton, King County, • Washington ' • - and said rezoning to be subject to the laws and ordinances of the City of Renton. SECTION II: This Ordinance shall be in full' force and effect from and aft4 its passage, approval and legal publications. PASSED BY THE CITY OOUNCIL this 17th day of October, 1961.• - • Reimie elson, City Clerk , APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 17th day of October, --961. APPROVED AS -TO FORM - r Frank Aliment, Mayor • Gerard M. Shellan, City Attorney DATE l T mod' i=€ ; NOV if,, - r n . n Cr ; ' . .. (-,•, rl • • n n , n �... t, • - c C. r, n," n r C . - - r` _ r; . i . r) .. r',- r, n rl 'p rl' , , n r: • " ( , n. n O. . n •;t ,. .. V. r; - -n r. , . - r-, n • . . ( > . V • n \ f., - 1. 1 ,0,,, JOSEPH R. BLUM •! Director 4)4. 1889 a°y STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES 115 General Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (206) 753-6600 • (SCAN) 234-6600 June 22, 1989 CITY OF RENTON ON J J U N 2 6 1989 ii Environmental Review Committee �; c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator I`11 [ �� r, 11 Ti C` !L-rv) Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 SUBJECT: Environmental Checklist No . ECF-045-89 (Fisheries SEPA Log No . 8801 ) Dear Mr . Erickson: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Panagakis/Kalasountas proposal for an office building. One of the most serious impacts to urban area waters is the introduction of pollutants such as oils, heavy metals, phosphates, etc. These pollutants enter the rivers and streams through storm run-off systems . Standard oil/water separators alone are generally insufficient to remove pollutants . Even with oil/water separators, these systems concentrate pollutants, then discharge them to the receiving waters . Therefore, in addition to the standard oil/water separators, another method to remove typical urban-related pollutants is necessary. This can be accomplished by designing shallow grass-lined swales leading to open detention ponds large enough to establish vegetation within them. It is that vegetation, acting in concert with the grass-lined swales, which create a bio-filter . Both sediments and pollutants are effectively trapped and removed by bio-filtration. It is recommended that bio-filtration be included into the drainage design. Creative landscape designs can incorporate both on-site detention and grass-lined swales . Thank you again for this opportunity to comment . If you have any questions regarding these comments please contact me at ( 206 ) 545-6582 . Sincerely, Gayle Kreitman Regional Habitat Manager GK :gk cc: WDF - Olympia a�u3 MEMO Date: June 22, 1989 To: Lenora Blauman From: John Morris Subject Kalasountas Office Building II There are two main recreation issues that need to be addressed by this project: 1) Trail development on the City's 7th Street right of way in order that a pedestrian connection can be made to the proposed Sunset/Puget Power Trail and 2) Project development on Sunset Blvd should not be allowed to reduce the onstreet bike lane that is in place on the west side of Sunset Blvd. The applicant should be encouraged to construct an eight foot asphalt connector path from Sunset to the Puget Power line right of way which is west of this project. The applicant should also design their onsite walkway system so that it makes a logical connection to the public walkway. It is critical that any project improvements such as landscaping, walkways or sidewalks not compromise the onstreet bike lane that exits uninterrupted on Sunset from Park Avenue to I-405. PLANNING DIVIS,aGAI Ci lY OF RENTON JU" N 22 y989�,;� .10 Washington State Duane Berentson .I/ Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E.30th Place Bellevue,Washington 98007 June 19, 1989 Don Erickson Zoning Administrator �i SUN 2 1 1989 \' Planning Division =,j � Community Development Department • f r Li 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 • SR 405 MP 1. 57 CS 1743 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance Paul Panagakis/George Kalasountas File No. SA-045-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the Determination of Non Significance (Mitigated) we received from the city of Renton on June 14, 1989. The proposed project involves building a 2700 sq. ft. office building at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. in Renton. Since the DNS has already been mitigated, the Department of Transportation has no further comments on this proposal. On future projects such as this one, we request an earlier opportunity to review and comment on the development proposals that pass through the city's SEPA review process • pertaining to the possible traffic impacts to state highways. Should you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel free to call Donald Hurter (562-4274) or Dick Aust .( 562- 4274) of my Developer section, or myself ( 562-4267) . �Si -rely, i00 i i %AMES/L. LUTZ, .E. District Utilities/ Developer Engineer DA:d'a .cc: State Aid 1stCITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division June 9, 1989 Paul Panagakis 341 Skinner Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Re: Kalasountas Office Building II 701 Sunset Boulevard N.E. (ECF; SA-045-89) Dear Mr. Panagakis: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on June 7, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a landscaping plan which includes plantings which are of sufficient quantity, size and diversity to provide an attractive view corridor on-site and to provide a visual buffer between adjoining sites. The plan shall be subject to approval by the City's Landscape Planner. 2. That the applicant develop a revised site plan including: a) on-site pedestrian-scaled exterior lighting in sufficient quantity and appropriate locations to provide adequate illumination to protect persons and property, and b) pedestrian access (raised sidewalks) at appropriate locations to link the structure to the parking area and to adjacent Sunset Boulevard, and of sufficient dimensions (a minimum of 42 inches in width) to enable safe pedestrian passage on site. Such plans shall be subject to approval by the City's Zoning Administrator. 3. That the applicant provide an on-site storm drainage plan, subject to approval by the City's Public Works Department. Note: A downstream drainage release shall be obtained from the downstream property owner to permit operation of the proposed storm drainage system. Such agreement shall be duly recorded with King County and placed on file with the City of Renton. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 r;) Paul Panagakis Kalasountas Office Building II June 9, 1989 Page 2 4. That the applicant shall provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes on-site improvements (30 foot driveway, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on the right-of-way frontage) and off-site improvements (e.g. curbs, gutters, sidewalks) on the dedicated right-of-way linking the west side of Sunset Boulevard -- at the site -- to N.E. 7th Street), subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division in order to enhance on-site and nearby off-site travel routes. Note: The applicant may seek to defer or waive off-site improvements only, through the Board of Public Works. 6. That the applicant shall provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; b) a plan for hours of operation and hauling subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division and the Police Department; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site and wheel-washing of construction vehicles before they leave the site to control dust and debris, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; and d) a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2,000.00. 7. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to run with the land requiring environmental review and site plan approval in conjunction with development of the R-1 (western) section of the parcel, in order to ensure the adequate protection of the site and neighboring properties. Such review will include, but not be limited to, assessment of impacts upon the natural environment (protection of slopes, flora and fauna), and environmental health (protection against abutting power lines). 8. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to run with the land requiring environmental review and site plan approval in conjunction with any redevelopment of the B-1 (eastern) section of the parcel, in order to ensure the adequate protection of the site and neighboring properties. Such review will include, but not be limited to, assessment of impacts upon the natural environment (protection of slopes, flora and fauna), and environmental health (protection against abutting power lines). 9. In addition to the above, the ERC requested that the applicant voluntarily contribute a sum of $1,800.00 ($18 per lineal foot) toward the development of a pedestrian link along the west side of Sunset Boulevard from the site to the planned Sunset Park Trail, in order to provide recreational amenities for office building employees and members of the local community. (Note: In the event that the Sunset Park Trail cannot be developed within a five year period, the monies contributed by-the proponent will be utilized by the City toward the development/improvement of other recreational facilities in the vicinity). The plan for contribution and management of funds shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney. Note: In conjunction with site plan review, conditions will be established mandating that the applicant address requirements as defined by the Fire Prevention Bureua (e.g. for access, hydrants), the Building Division (e.g. conformance to Building Code), and the Planning Division (e.g. for landscaping plans, exterior building materials, lighting fixtures). Paul Panagakis Kalasountas Office Buiiaing II June 9, 1989 Page 3 • Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end June 27, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235- 2550 and ask for Lenora Blauman or me. For the Environmental Review Committee, Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: George Kalasountas 701 Sunset Blvd. NE Renton, WA 98055 �$ CITY OF RENTON y c ; 'ea COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor 'Yrke;. Planning Division June 8, 1989 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section]" Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Environmental Determinations issued on June 8, 1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199,000 square foot (177,000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. The property is located on Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. TAXIWAY "B" PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS AND EXTENSION ECF-039-89 Applicant seeks to repave taxiway "B" with asphalt concrete pavement and to extend the taxiway 677 feet to the north. The property is located at the Renton Airport between Logan Ave., Airport Way, and Rainier Ave. North. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECKPOINT ECF-041-89 Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single checkpoint in an existing building. The checkpoint will be composed of two adjacent sections including: a) an indoor facility of 1800 square feet, and b) an outside facility of 1600 square feet. The property is located at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Environmental Determine is June 8, 1989 Page 2 KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. The property is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on June 27, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE OMNI GROUP REZONE ECF-037-89 Applicant seeks a non-project, programmatic rezone of an approximately 12,750 square foot parcel from R-3, Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use, to B-1, Commercial Use. The parcel is currently developed with a small business office in a residential-type structure which would remain on the site; no revision to the existing use or new development is presently being considered, however, as the building is an older one, it is conceivable that redevelopment might take place in the foreseeable future. The property is located at 3016 Benson Road South. • TELEPHONE CONDUIT FOR RENTON LIBRARY ECF; SME-049-89 Applicant seeks shorelines exemption to install telephone conduit for the Renton Library. The property is located at the Liberty Park Community Center. TELEPHONE CONDUIT FOR CITY HALL ECF; SME-050-89 Applicant seeks shorelines exemption to install a telephone conduit for City Hall. The property is located at the Liberty Park Community Center. TELEPHONE CONDUIT FOR LIBERTY PARK COMMUNITY CENTER ECF; SME-051-89 Applicant seeks shorelines exemption to install telephone conduit to serve the Liberty Park Community Center. The property is located at the Liberty Park Community Center. The Determinations are final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on June 26, 1989. Any appeal must state clearly in writing why the_ Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. ' . Environmental Determine: s June 8, 1989 Page 3 If you have questions, please call Jeanette Samek-McKague or me at 235-2550. Inc Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James L. Lutz, Department of Transportation 5 10r, 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 1, . NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL\ -. DETERMINATION . r,114 n e L s v i 11? ENVIRONMENTAL,REVIEW COMMIT 1,being first duly sworn on oath states RENTON,WASHINGTON that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the 'Thetignyironmental Review Committee '(ERC)has issued a Determination of Non- VALLEY DAILY NEWS Jet(s)cunde-AAjtigatedfor the following Repro.' ject(s) under the authority of the Renton • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition Municipal Code. :GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING `,(ECF; SA-030-89) ' ' 'i _ Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five. story/199,000 square foot(177,000 square are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six feet of leasable space)office building on an months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published 8.8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP)1 zone.The property is located on Lind Ave- in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King nue and S.W. 16th Street. County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECK- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for POINT(E 89) seeks t now- King County. Applicant to consolidate several functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition checkpoint'in an existing building. The' Renton Edition X checkpoint.will be composed of two adja-; Auburn Edition , (and not in cent sections including:a)an indoor facility supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers of 1800'bquare feet, and b) an outside during the below stated period. The annexed notice a facility of 1600 square feet.The property>is located a(the corner of S.W. 43rd Street' Notice of Environmental net and Lind Ave.'S.W. i • e r rt i n a t i o ii KALASOUNTAS i OFFICE (EP ; SA-045-89) ! ; i i ! ; > I '.BUILDING J n r 1 . , 1 ,t 8? ,Applicant seeks site plan,approval for the was published on 5 2 , 7 . construction kof,as:2,700 square foot office' building'on-an'approximately .267_acre section of a'property'which totals approxi- mately .544 acres."That'.267 acre section, The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the on the eastern portion of the property, is sum of$ 3 9 • 5 2 zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building:The western section of the` ,� property(app ately 277$Cre).is zoned't CY `�"'�— `Department, Municipal Building, Renton,j v i Washington, 235-2550. This Determination i i:;FINAL.,There is a 14 day appeal period! which will end at 5:00 p.m, on June 26,1 Subscribed and sworn before me this 1 p day of .T un 19 a _ �1989. Any appeal of this decision may be 1 }made to the City's Hearing Examiner,1 ..Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, ' s Renton,;Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing why the Determination{ should be reviser)`and must be accrompa-., Wiwi by a non-refundable$75.00 filing fee.; (7F- :2 °.... *. • Published Juror 12,.1989 Valley•Daily tlVews A5257 AcCt.1151087 4,51441., Notary Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 . its ,•'t. , • t ;1') • t�,' A, 1• ; mot , ... ,It L t . ._7 • elf , 11. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project(s) under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. GSA/FAA OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-030-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for a five story/199, 000 square foot (177 , 000 square feet of leasable space) office building on an 8 . 8 acre parcel in an Office Park (OP) zone. The property is located on Lind Avenue and S.W. 16th Street. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECKPOINT ECF-041-89 Applicant seeks to consolidate several now-functioning hazardous materials receiving areas by relocating all materials to a single checkpoint in an existing building. The checkpoint will be composed of two adjacent sections including: a) an indoor facility of 1800 square feet, and b) an outside facility of 1600 square feet. The property is located at the corner of S.W. 43rd Street and Lind Ave. S.W. KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2 ,700 square foot office building on an approximately . 267 acre section of a property which totals approximately . 544 acres. That . 267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-i and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately . 277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. The property is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5: 00 p.m. , June 27 , 1989 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055, . Phone: 235-2550. Published: June 12 , 1989 .. 4. • ; I • • •t i4 VI • N oT E ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION ECF-045-89, SA-045-89 APPLICATION NO. PAUL PANAGAKIS/GEORGE KALASOUNTAS APPLICANT KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING PROPOSED ACTION Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a one story 2,'/00 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres, That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned 13-I and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately .277 GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESSre) is zoned R-l; no development is proposed for this residential section at this 701 Sunset Blvd. NE time. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES XDOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL WILL NOT _ BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JUNE 27, 1989 , AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. CERTIFICATION - - - , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT IE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN COPIES OF _ACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON � CONSPICUOUS ATTEST; Subscribed and /morn to before me, e Notary Public, -In and for the State of Washington residing in C � • day o L�y on the 1_ SIQ" .SIGNED: .------ , i-1.,':'.-7.; ., ..' 'l'‘?f V.'Lii „`•s'„ , r•' ;'.. ••• . . "I' , •;., A kro.:;:"4';'•'.',', •'. .•" '.`''. '..... ,ki' ,5370: ,'F '."1.:1.-"•.Si',g' , ,' f" 7C—t, ' ',...,. 4 '-. , S ';'. I:- :,. • ''...'lk ", ''.: ' i'',C. • ' .., ,•,.-• . (.; .V. .1 ' S:;i1 • -..., ,-, • . '• 4'7 ''L • . • "'' '' ' /:.• 'i, ' ,.., ,,. 't.t, .,, ,../. ,0i.. ... ,,,, t,.:. ,. -1-„. •- lii, ., • , • *17.•i . ' • " ' . • .i . ,• . •• 0', •• .1 ., '.' .• ,. 1: . .•. . 1. ; , •'''' ' -"•,•-•'-, k.•;,•••1; .,-.. . • — • • r,s -.-- . '3. --':.:'••:4•1, . ., , • • . . . . , i. . • .---• •':' • ..e' . . . . • .. • 7 .II 7 ,., 4. . 7 , I, - - ' 7.;.' •-, •. . . '.., . •, . . , i• ... . . .• • , . . , .-- ' I. .is .: . .- 1 •• ... . .... 13T '...i i:, _10 7...31.-. • r I . to'. ....., i . c. t-..3 ! , ":.t.i'rl.'-.)f•-1'.7 • . .-!11 'F 1 3‘•• i•.. :-3 r .F-1 I.'.; :1' I, . . l',11 .,,..1(„'•-') ____ _.___._....... ....._ ......_ . . _ . . . ... ........., k 4 . • , tr.', • . .-- . . . ' • ''' . ... ..., .17 . .., . . . . . . . . . . ,.. . . . .,..,.. • .,. , • • ,. NoTICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-045-89, SA-045-89 KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING APPLICANT PAUL PANAGAKIS/GEORGE KALASOUNTAS PRnDAc ED ACTIQQN APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR A FIVE STO /1 9 000 SQi1RE FOOT (177 , 000 SQUARE FEET OF LEASABLE SPACE) OFFICE BUILDING ON AN 8 . 8 ACRE PARCEL IN AN OFFICE PARK (OP) ZONE. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS 11.1111.1111.111111111111111.1111.11.1111 .11111111111 701 Sunset'._Blvd NE POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT U WILL IX WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY JUNE 27, 1989 AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • • • r !%!!' iiJ ,{ ; ;11)I11 i •,� i_/ ?. I%• ..,c. :1{„ r.7(` )1 'C :t ' 1 :,3• • a ) i I` j' Ll:r (•a.. I. 1'.. lr:�l• t � - rr 1 •I':. - . ( rc , • h • - { - • � t. • • r • ') f • ! 7 r • - • '1 } 71 r ( •H '.Pr r. I<_ r.7: CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis/George Kalasountas DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a one story 2 ,700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately . 277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. The property is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 . 21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from June 12, 1989 . Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , June 27, 1989 in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/o Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 PUBLICATION DATE: June 12, 1989 DATE OF DECISION: June 7, 1989 SIGNATURE en Lyn ut mann C munit De Director Pub i W rks Director • ; . I - : LI. f '1". f c',"-! t • • . •. • 1 " •i p • 1, . . . .f_ . )'• 't ; ('I' f I •' I ! ,c , •) . -..„;Jr • 37pL. „..),.T.1- [3 ii;bEC1. JF ;•,A „To, . r.:43 '1.C)9 T• • ' ;.s.,11f •(,) -„,wit r „ ibL•DP .1 11 I; - A f.i • (JI).;1-4 9 1;1 1- .11:, • . , (..);cc ;3.1) :1 i -a '. i '' J ;)) 9I') ; 7.1)1.1 -..•476 );, c.-.) cs, • 4..; hr.:. •- ' •: ci1-• " :2 ( `,1 7. ;jug: c.:)) • (._lf19 f 0 • c: f-111 ' 7;•:;".43 , •-: : 11.34. ' I j t ; (A.) i4 . j - f'• •w.1 A • -zi.:21t..1 Li • 13"•1 ; 911 . • , I : ; r C L' • .; .C- . r.)-f•r ; 1:1.3. L,p t.• • •• ' N -)r.; .4.; 3 1C43 ! 111.46'a. 1 7• ff3 •1.- .-);• •- .•—••• .1 , z,•3 EC,C, 11•.71i;01;1. • • • ! 4. . " • ..• , 1 •' •‘ . t ;'. -f : . V l! ;11••'` • • ` ; • a `• .."(:1 • L,'I . , - • r 01„: ( f ".. " • '• ; • ; •• . r :. " . ; `.31. !" ri T1' • • L ; '• ,i, L.-- :0— ; ; • r � DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Kalasountas Office Building ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-045-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2,700 square foot office building on an approximately . 267 acre section of a property which totals approximately . 544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1 and is currently developed with a small (approximately 600 square foot) office building. The western section of the property (approximately . 277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at 701 Sunset Blvd. NE. RECOMMENDATIONS: Issue a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant develop a landscaping plan which includes plantings which are of sufficient quantity, size and diversity to provide an attractive view corridor on-site and to provide a visual buffer between adjoining sites. The plan shall be subject to approval by the City's Landscape Planner. 2 . That the applicant develop a revised site plan including: a) on- site pedestrian-scaled exterior lighting in sufficient quantity and appropriate locations to provide adequate illumination to protect persons and property, and b) pedestrian access (raised sidewalks) at appropriate locations to link the structure to the parking area and to adjacent Sunset Boulevard, and of sufficient dimensions (a minimum of 42 inches in width) to enable safe pedestrian passage on site. Such. plans shall be subject to approval by the City's Zoning Administrator. 3 . That the applicant provide an on-site storm drainage plan, subject to approval by the City's Public Works Department. Note: A downstream drainage release shall be obtained from the downstream property owner to permit operation of the proposed storm drainage system. Such agreement shall be duly recorded with King County and placed on file with the. City of Renton. 4. That the applicant shall provide a traffic mitigation plan which includes on-site improvements (30 foot driveway, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on the right-of-way frontage) and off-site improvements (e.g. curbs, gutters, sidewalks) on the dedicated •• lu( • WEi1.4.767:T 9"! a 1.)I.: brg1.11Jr•-•cj. (C3' 6 ° .;.(21. bj FEILT0i, prj 13n f-1 (3 LIT (.6 6 • c;c1.3 1 4.20 la) •":1 /.1(.1 CO(j0) ' Ili): CIG i3C3(.1 r„.6,'" t L4' : ;Cori. 9 ° rgrg I:T.i.1(9 g I-1.3 piorc).: If! 01. 1! ;if.; t • '41' -1, (in rgi! '••• ' 1 '-'• •...IC 911:i I f I r.-5 r e r c; C3 h.. •-•:' -11 ur 1.1:.', •• 7; •; c 1111:,0.: ••-.A,' t 0 r.j.JE;rs. 1. 3 T •r•••1,!,:. ` Pc; Li- ' :la T.f f 7 q •ti • 3 (.7. )1,,.1.2i• T ILA • ).; )7' I.:. Of 1 1('•€, 11%,641 )2.'6 ).? n:- , f 1 • c. 2. C 0-, . . ' '1L1 iJCCH .; l• 2; 9 " ',T. )1; . 1-11c,g1 I ) •)(it LI. • jo , . • 16 Gliel ITTM:31t ' 1 ' • ' •.: 1: • l'IrT3Z71) • • r.,1 . : • ; •;1./0 "...1•:)1:: oe T • .• ' r. "zl• ZT" 17 f1"4.11I-T.0.-). • 3j1pc' 1' -; f .1 r • i• .(3‘ . r •-FT- 17(3- T•-•:C:;•••4 !I.Wre r.,cp -; • H: T, ."3,1 ' 3 • 1: -,I• C, f. L: • • ) f ' ' :,1 ' :L! • • -„ 1:•1• 7' I; •' ,7-• •, ; • ... )1- 1i11.1,1 1.1.. . " . j )( b-n " +3 : ry r" • " Jf.' • . .r; = , i".--/ •t4.:. • •, ! • A ' r ;21, . ?. f ••• ' •' • ' • ' --• /II) r r7.- • • 4 • 2 ' Y.? •; • :••jrt- r r..• _ D.y A:I-L; :•: ° •17! bc•ir, v". , . b '. 3 J,{ ‘ 11.10i3t. `SG- f !".")T e), pon (it g i \ , T.( ‘N" L. 11" r.• r; i; ciL ' pf.04: • 1 • 1.c. C 1(. 1 CI! lii',11,1.-J..16-1.f!6-4 b." :•).) !) • • -•,,•-;• r-f-) q, • i... 9 • Ak.:' ' - • ' 1- ,1 ;20 • 1, ctf, miJ 1- 01:: jG -Ha 1.-111 -4-t.j, 01, 211 -- 94'2 1:11(4 -t.•; 1 PT' Ltigation Measures ilasountas Office Building II ige 2 right-of-way linking the west 'side of Sunset Boulevard -- at the site -- to N.E. 7th Street) , subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division in order to enhance on-site and nearby off-site travel routes. Note: The applicant may seek to defer or waive off-site improvements only, through the Board of Public Works. 6. That the applicant shall provide a construction management plan including: a) an erosion control plan subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; b) a plan for hours of operation and hauling subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineering Division and the Police Department; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site and wheel-washing of construction vehicles before they leave the site to control dust and debris, subject to the approval of the Public Works Department; and d) a street clean-up bond in the amount of $2, 000.00. 7. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to run with the land requiring environmental review and site plan approval in conjunction with development of the R-1 (western) section of the parcel, in order to ensure the adequate protection of the site and neighboring properties. Such review will include, but not be limited to, assessment of impacts upon the natural environment (protection of slopes, flora and fauna) , and environmental health (protection against abutting power lines) . 8. That the applicant provide a restrictive covenant to run with the land requiring environmental review and site plan approval in conjunction with any redevelopment of the B-1 (eastern) section of the parcel, in order to ensure the adequate protection of the site and neighboring properties. Such review will include, but not be limited to, assessment of impacts upon the natural environment (protection of slopes, flora and fauna) , and environmental health (protection against abutting power lines) . 9 . In addition to the above, the ERC requested that the applicant voluntarily contribute a sum of $1, 800. 00 ($18 per lineal foot) toward the development of a pedestrian link along the west side of Sunset Boulevard from the site to the planned Sunset Park Trail, in order to provide recreational amenities for office building employees and members of the local community. (Note: In the event that the Sunset Park Trail cannot be developed within a five year period, the monies contributed by the proponent will be utilized by the City toward the development/improvement of other recreational facilities in the vicinity) . The plan for contibution and management of funds shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney. Note: In conjunction with site plan review, conditions will be established mandating that the applicant address requirements as defined by the Fire Prevention Bureua (e.g. for access, hydrants) , the Building Division (e.g. conformance to Building Code) , and the Planning Division (e.g. for landscaping plans, exterior building materials, lighting fixtures) . mmdoc SPEED LETTER TO: (lie /(/T /77.,4/ /V'A [.7 DATE: #i1)//,,, /i 5, n / V PROJECT: SUBJECT: j/.Z-44-0(.1/(/T�,S 0 creAp l�dhi'R�.s r 4liil��JI 6".113tl CITY OF H N? JN EMM /? r7-.4 // / 4 Signed SEPA/LAND USE APPLICATION PROCESSING PROCEDURES October 198E PATE INITIALS 1. Pre-application conference held (highly recommended for major projects.) 2. Application received and appropriate application fees collected. *3. Front office staff stamps date application received (staff receiving the application should date stamp at least Master Application form, and every drawing should be stamped.) 4. Decision made on whether or not project is categoricallyexempt under SEPA. ' Application Review I. Application reviewed by assigned Planning staff person for completeness: a. Application compared to handout on required documentation and plans for complete application. Review includes indication of compliance with . zoning, other code requirements and/or covenants, ' or Examiner's conditions as well as completeness of environmental checklist. This information is to be recorded on the Plan Check Review Sheet. *b. If application is complete, reviewer prepares letter of acceptance, fills out review sheets (reviewer coordinates dates for environmental review and land use review with Zoning Administrator or Senior Planner), and goes to next step. c. If project complete, secretary sets up project disk. *d. If application incomplete, reviewer prepares letter to the applicant requesting additional information. When new material received, reviewer repeats Steps a. and b. e. Project and application presented to Zoning Administrator for group discussion of issues (at least weekly). NOTE: Items with asterisk are to be checked as to accuracy or completeness by either the Zoning Administrator or the Senior Planner. • Application Routing and Return, 1. Preparation of'application for routing, J� 2. File Clerk completes routing preparation and routing of applications. J W 51/6 pGho I�ropi ouAL(bsreks rsreo 5-12,-69 AFL . 1.1 • 'If 1,11 L‘, Ci k,I1Ci•I I. )1.0 IA) !;);{,if.:;( t ! Ct.0.1!(,11; 1 OL. 1 .1:515,1... II 11',„! 11),q-1,1;,,L1c .1,tr. 2CE1 (4! 1i,1ic, 1:: C .1 111.1;,,' EL! ;65 fil.r.15110,11 LIEV:.0 tf-;, i11,1.if.511 01. E:E, :IT' 1:' 1/111 1.1--.1t1,•.Pqr ;if:I11 0 II rifi 1,,2 ;IL.; (1,1•',,/;;‘,01;!,- '4.! 5 )/,‘ b..It; .15.,1.;11,,J:.,4. II 310 j„11".:( 1.1( 1.;.,11!, , r 15c.ft i • ; tr L jr) .,1 /I, 1, (11,1.115 CI;•C,Fq( t E.,C,1;. .011.r.1 1„;..1 C.1 '414,11111/..(3:" GL: , •• Eirt,)j.• • Cat E L.011,!..1.:!-..v11.)r. j) 7 1,1 • ,;41:1.1.1.11 " t• ki 1‘;11 b.p.- 11 .01,11 1.. ;•'1.."• ; L fJ1 1•?1, a1.1141, 1.',i,!Q,1 I? ?111 1, ;,„111 ).1,12. hLC'EU k.0,1 ;" 1),/, cc `. 115 i:Z11,17 4;1 ;•\ . • 1c., ,t :LE LOL 2'11,1:11L- b tr;..!.: irg; 1 ,111 (1E.0 _, k, 4' LI, 1',15-(2,. 1:14::;A• i,C4j1:1,4,Fett :I; ..) 111,„ Itii.!.1)1:4 t!10. 3,- .141,1 ; 11,/ t 141 (3;, 11,2111,4:110 .1! t{ /1.,;•11pi. 0.1 1,,IC;01!LIti" ErLE if:;/.1. 2,14; 1)1.1!.‘1,::11 E 1).11 f‘L.:1E,• r Q f;.q 4 kr tl .4 1,0;4.-1 •1.44. 1.04' •-.114(). ' E./61 C.;1.4: 1;1491 t rE.'(.; •5;).E i:E . • •I t.6.1:''1., .4, 11;1.1)(1iu-;; tt.nwr.x 1.14:1•2\ 31,Q k.f,i;LoE,114E1, OW 41.101.1,1L,541 Qt;Z.E:',111141.!!‘") ?",1114 rte, Z111)-1.131,3k :?•\. WE; 1.1.0.11- .qtE111.111:;1:., ttly it'?11r E; I cf: rikCinJJ. SEPA/LAND USE Application Procedures October 198& >E; Page 2 DATE INITIALS. *3. Returned circulation files shall be stamped by the 'front counter staff to reflect the date they are returned to the Planning Division. 4: Secretary receives and handles routing folder. 5. File clerk files routing folders. • 6. - Photographs and/or video taken, as needed. Environmental Review 1. . TAC agenda prepared for subject 'applications (check item 6.c:) and : distributed to TAC members Friday p.m. before meeting. 2. TAC staff reports and tentative recommendations .prepared for subject applications and submitted to Zoning Administrator for his review by Monday noon preceding ERC meeting. 3. ERC agenda prepared for subject applications (check item 6.c) and distributed to ERC members Friday p.m. 4, ERC .staff reports and recommendations, prepared for subject application and submitted ,to Zoning Administrator for his review by Monday Noon preceding ERC meeting. 5. Reports revised if, necessary (typos, etc.), and then placed in application folders. 6. Threshold environmental determination (DNS-Mitigated or DS) issued by ERC with Committee members' signatures on form. *a. " Prepare letters to parties of record regarding decision. *b. Prepare legal notice and send to newspaper advertising 15 day comment.period by first Friday noon following ERC meeting. c: Prepare posters. d. Posters placed on or near site. e. Place reduction of legal notice in City Hall reader board. *f. Send .notice of ERC Threshold Determination and Environmental Checklist for 15 day comment period to ,DOE for inclusion in SEPA register. *g. Prepare and send notices to jurisdictions (King County, Department of Game) with an interest in project (if required). . • 7,• I 1" l ‘41'.., • •in't-• . 1 re vP.1-01.) .51711: it) ?;'411131'.1 Ili ' PIT; irlif!:n.,10"n 0.3 4.1.r41:i;Eni:r .4r.V.1191 lirti•I .0*, moTit r. 'm4.1.: ;It) i)yob.,3.4 biri ,tor.y..'r '11 ' ri9-8,1 '1IUf •;1,9p. 1,•1ii":•,91) y•.1.1 ' , frt9 '•ffefroi "i" ;";r:siii!'••••-•? it 'f:rf t8s -411 • )fifrt . )4141 044 :Pt IFV..(1'01? th4..; t • 6- '311 : 1 ' 'T 6- • If :lc, 01 no.I •:(1'(111,,,24(i •••••2.1);.1‘)P bs.11; 'VIC; J1,3 :k111•;t-F. o• .5161(014s in :(41.1 " . :P.rf."1 11 ' ;'•111 i;. '117'.'n • '06 1 "c.ii!, .1)1 11.f,1:1 fit • ;,!, iv 6) ().1 1Oii 91 I, !7, •1-3 1.1 Jrf It. .it41111'41•'. blr;y1 f )( 311'911",, anit)i:gf/16):: 1!)71!-1(Fir ;.,(111rici ,•• 0-,•);?iyil.1 i 4Z,'I F!..1 I nal I -.61,1 01 U. i ci!ty I F., •Irl; ..•?A(•`'i';'. 'I i•ICI 13! :;•!1 !•,;(5, Rit•i; r.:14 6.51h11(fr,4-.`) iinu btin iz:11.1% -4)11r)(il !r•p,t31 vil:1 • • • ; o• fill • • it ):: SEPA/LAND USE Application Procedures October 1988 Page 3 DATE . INITIALS. 7. Environmental decision finalized and issued by ERC. a. " If.no significant comments received and ERC decision is not revised, letter 'finalized" environmental determination sent.`to all parties of record informing them that the threshold decision sent to them is final and has remained unchanged and the date the appeal period ends. *b. If significant comments are received and the ERC decision is revised, then the following steps must be taken. ;. 1: Prepare revised Determination, if necessary, for mailing to all parties of record and Department of Ecology.' *2. Mail revised Determination to all parties of record and Department. of Ecology if necessary. *c. Prepare legal notice and send to newspaper stating ERC decision and 14 :. day appeal.period: *d. Prepare posters; ... e. Post on or near subject property; f Place reduction of legal notice in City Hall reader board. ._. g. Submit copy of SEPA decision to City Clerk's office for Public Information T.V. Bulletin Board. Shoreline Exemptions/No Land Use 1. Prepare shoreline exemption decisions for Zoning Administrator's signature. 2. Prepare package for mailing shoreline exemptions to the Department of ' Ecology (Shorelands Division). Land Use Review 1. Preparation, for Public, Hearing (SEPA appeals, rezones, special permits, conditional uses, larger site plan reviews, and subdivision,applications.) 2. Public hearing agenda established with concurrence of Hearing Examiner and Zoning Administrator. *3. Public hearing legal notice sent to newspaper at least 10 days in advance of public hearing. _.. 4. Prepare agenda for public hearing. 5. Reduction of public hearing legal notice place in reader board. . c; c, tt. ,ti• at .7% r, •, b • . 0.• LB!, 7.1.4J.! tJ. : -7.- 1„j, ,ill •.;(1l fl U IOU 1.1 cili 11 CIJI;cil,:!. 1)1.‘:1:) )*, ht.!I 4.. Jr, .J picifiqp4:1,;2().;.1:494),1 JiJ 1111'1 1tr-rj1 ci tIcU1 E.A1.1!1 f b,..0:1;.: •:)(.1 0.J.. ;.J.!"01:: !I ot J1JIULJ I /51, 1.11 cat' Dti A.11751-11' R. • • " C•if; I.: 1.,,01.1Pt, • -•••- •— - •emq,,„ !? L.di JO.t %11 e, • bo, I i;c: ..'1 !! 8:A1.1.0 !A A: 11:AT.:,, •• LcA. 11 (Alir'; i1G1.11!LIR: b A t!J)J • ,.0.01_,,,:g1t,11C;;:.t .1‘,";) I I bo.1:;.; 110,J J o jG.• • -1Etf_T!. i 0.1.1r.)1 ;)11+' • 2131 • u CV. !CAI HitA Ex.Aw /1;1,- s, j 11;6" t',.26bui-I tiLri ii.;b0)1?• ?11 St)11.4.,•11.) JIG?, i '‘''',C31.1 14;11 " f(1‘ tic , C.1•7.1 , 10 :J, ilArcA4. .• idr• I . 1)01,;, f11„7. Tug fl4k1 . T-r1:41:—! c-1,1!? (flcirs: jh. . ‘ clutp)plalqt. :e3Ezi: If•bcyt .• 1.01, !'" 5.1+0 • • kit:3 fr. p.• - f•!C 01 t,r, 01: 1,1 ,; iC iti Iui t 1,3!1;ef j 3ki!virc.G. p . , '41V6P., ij)it, faVC: f 0.c •:!A Izq • !, ••"-' :F.7;7 . . i:;1• \ litt:P 1.-12,i;.'?, "ft.1;dir (-4 • SEPA/LAND USE Application Procedures October 1988 Page 4 DATE INITIALS *6.. Notices to adjacent property owners for plats sent out at feast 10 days in advance of public hearing. .......... .. . :. *7. Letter to parties of record of public hearing at least 10 days in advance of public hearing. *8. Exhibits prepared for public hearing. 9. Staff report prepared. 10•: Reviewed by Zoning Administrator at least 8 days prior to hearing. 11. Staff report put together and .copied and then forwarded to Hearing Examiner at least 7 days prior to hearing. • 12.. Staff report sent to all parties of record for public hearing. . 1'3`: Reports revised (typos, etc.) and reports, placed in appropriate files with at least 2 extra copies for the hearing. 14. Hearing Examiner report reviewed and findings discussed with applicant. 15. Presentation of staff analysis and recommendations to Hearing Examiner by Zoning Administrator or Senior Planner. Appeal Hearings 1. Appeal hearings are held occasionally. Preparation of these hearings.is the same as for a regular public hearing: publication, notices to parties of record, and posters. Normally these hearings do not require preparation of a staff report/response. This is done at the discretion of the Zoning Administrator. 2: Presentation by Staff. Shorelines Substantial Developments 1. Substantial Development. Permits prepared for signature of Planning - . Manager and Building Official. 2. Prepare submittal package including original application, Hearing Examiner decision (if project required such),.environmental checklist, environmental decision, maps, shoreline permit decision, and.legal notice. 3: Mail application package to Department of Ecology and Attorney General's • office together with copy of permit. • 38(1 • • .9111i i.•0,1 r;;,rij9 ?ft t.•,; min 15114. •011)3.R.Aciln ah 1It. P.S 8111):!511'.1 '10( 116:i;?,1;rION' t •((..1 bn.t; .• •ilytt):)91 1O P1)iic.g(191q 113ri nirl..)!zs.l. 9&iglu • .91 !rpuif.1 .?...10W jrikf7i ItillT.)01(.! i:7.9 I 1 )1 &thin .:1•6iii; .i() I V::r) t)j F; .D 9_1(1:7. I i 01 rtots •<;1 '.01 . . 521: .06,-2 1.j 1i ,(.11(1(10 II i21 ( ,(1r413 ,tr,Voii'r.1.); -Jiff!:9'1 'Init.11511,; fie! e' Tilr1 JzLali) •( fli tit)i.;i1011 Or, l'..4ftifi1izi..1 ,/11.1•109I) bfii; (.1)91,9/O..; is if-' m; ••• i• • •• • • • • SEPA/LAND USE Application Procedures ` October 1988. Page 5 DATE INITIALS Subdivisions, Short Plats, and Lot Line Adjustments. ' . 1. Mylar checked by Planning Division. 2. Mylar sent to Don Monaghan for checking as soon as approved by Examiner and received by applicant. 3. Plat Preparation for Recording a. Blueprints made for King County using blueprint machine in. Public Works. . b. Sepia made for Engineering using blueprint machine in Public Works. c. Give two blueprints and mylar to. City Clerk's office for filing with King County. Building Pro iect Compliance with Imposed Conditions. *1. Project checked for compliance with conditions of approval, SEPA, site plan approval, rezone approval, subdivision approval or conditional use approval prior to the issuance of the building permit:. *2. Zoning Administrator and Hearing Examiner so notified in writing. (Must ensure Parks, Long Range.Planning, and Police conditions are 'covered.) RENTUN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Parks hw...k Pc•G�•a41trY1 DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1, The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residentialAtion at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth . • • . . . 2. Air • • • • • 3 . Water • • • • • • 4 . Plants • • • • • —.-.: • 5. Animals • • • . e • 6. Energy & Natural Resources • 7. Environmental Health • �a,►�,"'- ON • 8. Land & Shoreline Use • d�i%! / fj',, • 1 0 YiN• I I ,9• Housing_ •- f _� • 10. Aesthetics • • r41 11. Light & Glare • crrr OF . 12. Recreation • JUN 2 "89 13. Historic & Cultural Preservation • _ tiEG IV ED 14 . Transportation • • • 15. Public Services • • 0 • • 16. Utilities • 0 0 COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where . . �� ' :ion n ormation is needed to properly assess this proposal . /t/emu/.? Sig ' � � e of Director or Authorized Representative Dat Rev. 6/88 w f RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 • acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the • property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required'for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE ' LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: ,h4/ f /flecdoe-4 / c4_ APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE /1/ G 2 GI I SIGNA R OF D R OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SH , T i"418, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �R�tv\eex1 ® M4 �F19�cN�s/0y I r oN DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 e /� ps�989 ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 (� �1 k /� <S' PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9. Housing ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14. Transportation ° ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° r/ o ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° � COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are . where /addition/al information is needed to properly assess this proposal . :./( Signature of Director (or Authorized Representative De Rev. 6/88 w a . RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE , LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /ha )4,4,/ �• /- Z./rpt .dQ��1 ,J Lit", A1- , , '/6 a/90---1-- 4� � rqi 2-624 S ,-/-70-5/, -E./0V? cz-1,e14. 1 :V--3----)z)d-e- 9 j 0 4 Vet I tt O c .\ DATE / pt,,y/7/1i 9 SIG TURE 0 IRECTOR OR A HORIZED REPRESENTATIVE �/ REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 4,4I� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: i(jq ` E, �/ 4%4r C//),Op/AO fQ�NT rp DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 � 1 ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA '045-89 / n �98� PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis 4 PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2; square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbel Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and t( develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The ini application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants 0 / - ° O 5. Animals ° �/ ° o O O 6. Energy & Natural Resources o O O 7. Environmental Health o O O 8 . Land & Shoreline Use • f ° o O O 9. Housing o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 0 o O O 11. Light & Glare ° 0 o O O 12 . Recreation ° o O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation f, lib 7 f � ° 15. Public Services ° �` 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: // /o 3.0 /1, ye f Y `tom We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those ar( which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . Signature of Director or Au-- orized Representative Datev 1 Rev. 6i RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this proiect because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE , LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS APPROVED &Jakee2DC C 4,7 C2,6 DATE Gv �o � SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE `' REV. 6/88 I / c;�tiN/ RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEN '� N(�'� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW Sjli 1 ot,�Fy�i , • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: poi1G� /e' `53 T0N/ DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5 24 89 �� �989 ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700. square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE . _ SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° o 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° o 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° o 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° o ° O 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° o 0 14. Transportation ° ° 0 . ° 15. Public Services J` o v�^`' ° 0 ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: Z. va oo 0.ait.rcerc,: m At +rt w�au•' v4lirit t�v+-h'c.A. peurah.. z) vt dy,c GL.vvh 04(.. GVG4.Qoo'`... We have reviewed this application with articu r attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where dditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . /520V1 Signature of i ecto r Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file''for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION (`' FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE , LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED "-APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DWLAôçrvut' ak Oki& liuixduNatiptaok• Veltel 44.1.4-116t).- WI-AL 6rnt Uri 4Y coteAkedKk Velkyt thduAhe46vlti4,wi- Q04A0 UL. DATE Dr Zip(SIGNATURE OF D CTORAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 AY A ' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - ENVIRONMENTALO C/4/ /4/C CHECKLIST REVIE1�V ���,. ,c < REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -lrc. e,`ler1�tsY\ ` eS 19 DATECIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 O�p ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 a� i/ 4F [MA: i PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this proiect because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 0 ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° ° 0 o ° ° 60 Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health 0 ° o o ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use a 0 ° o ° o 9 . Housing ° ° O ° ° 10. Aesthetics a ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° 0 o ° ° 12 . Recreation 0 0 ° o 0 ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 0 O ° ° 14. Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services 0 ° 16. Utilities ° ° 0 COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Dar / Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 • acres. That .267 acre section. on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION (lc, FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE , LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO- THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION,: APPROVED ,// APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with Current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances A tAcl means of approved access is required. Firepartment access roads/lanes shalt be paved mam width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes ._, No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of Aaoo is required• el— hydrants with a minimum flow of i .gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes No No r All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes No All fire hydrants are requ'red to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes_„' No___. DATE, ` o'y/.f/979 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. .6/88 / 2,e//n/.s/f/,ey Q./VX V REQU I RCD FIRE FLOt•J CALCULATIONS 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME /r.9alASoa vi AS D/ /C.e- ,'/4. U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS 7d/ . 0'-vci5 ,4./1//> mot/ e FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III q:;FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY WOOD MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (Al NUMBER OF STORIES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: ,� OO 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA CA): 45"CJD GPM (B. 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: T 375" GPM (C. IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARD, ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): (IF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) // 4 GPM (D: 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM CE. (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF (D). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH gO . ADD /e7:- % 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST /5— ADD 2:0 % 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH (Z. ADD z a 8 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST /Z ADD 2 U % 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : ®70 if (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: -F- 'i . 7 . S GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: . (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM' (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) �. (IF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,' GPM) 5 (D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: o? COO GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: �-;.-- �' '� e,",.•., ... I.ATE `�/U. / /Z^ /P D 9 r • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET 1,1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: CA-j II-hGS O `, DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 '4y 1 0,;./0 y of 04/ ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 �&e 19(99 i PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis ,v ^ PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II �5 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 27( square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of tl property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at 1 time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initi application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° ° ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14. Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° i 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those are which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or . where addition a , informatio is needed to properly assess this proposal . Signature of Director or thorized Representative Date Rev. 6/f RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 271 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of t property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbeli Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The init application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: -1--UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED III WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUI' DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Ora. y .'ivc,/N„&, evive. APPROVED .-_- APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPRC -UTILITY APPROVAL&EJECT TC LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-WATER YRS..U /.iZ Rio,4"s°1 /g,'. ?G ° 0 35; 2,3 an LATE COMERS AGREEMENT-SEMI ` _ _ o .S.�_-I 42 4 s 4 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CrInRGE-td'A`3E�i ,X.2,3, 476,rib 7 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CiLIRCE- EV f SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREAC6;:.m2E-t?a.TE a � *RR It A) k,4 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA SE7. 4 APPROVED WATER PLAN R�Gc * 11A 1M1- (ME. A DO M ot�1AL PIKE W0(OR APPROVED SEWER PLAEI t o- if sloe 5eu1E2 a vy Pea GiaE t1AMIA13 'RE&uiRENEK. * 2E46 1111 WARM WATER 'PLAN APPROVED FIRE HYDRANT Li1CATW:s YES slow ALL 64 T1N& HYDQAO WIfl II4 Id BY FIRE DEFT. Soo Ff of PRo9lerY. # stew Latta itui 00 exist'► Sewed, F@RBI lC�d nuns [me, coN lecTiow '� w� S to s 6,4 S ire �t A6o P DATE � — 18 -'O 9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUT#R ZED REPRESENTATIVE EV. 6/8 8 Ct4.+ RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 131 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE T 4,„ •,,� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: StOirw, W&Cx— f 41,4Y DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 ! 1 ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 4.S , PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis U PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 27( square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section. on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of t property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The init application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° O 3 . Water ° ° 0 o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: see CCU,\yVe_v, 1-S r7 ` Yi t k r''5 P_. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those are which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal . Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 'Rev. 6/ RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 27( square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of t property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at time. Environmental review is required for this protect because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The init application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT k OTHERS: 34bWy\ L,t)q' ",ey- COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED II\ WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUI' DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPRC P C]o`„/r�S k r'��rA e -'iU n c-e b c \-01v\e_ -C,ro �1,� ���.1v�s��e�.�^� Copt,* 01.Jv�e✓ b,C Q 4-0 S f aro.N 5 s 1 5 k csk-J r�o Y z) DQ ..- vv.(' b c.s, 6 0 + by� `s 1A0✓(d Yd 0 + 1��l� �e�l�e. ram- e. �✓ �. 3 A -F (ec) 61 1 )y 4(--ter- Sep 2l'c,_ r 11 6 e re-PA' cJ pI by +G it-Rl gate, 9v-1,4° DATE 5 //Gip9 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 p 44, iI) cOlfrafro RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM^ OF -/p ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW :4';' k 1 ���To N REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ul ut tal eeO 1989 DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89c eu/ ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 27( square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of tl property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at I time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initi application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° o ° 2 . Air ° ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° ° ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7. Environmental Health ° o ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o /- 0 ° 9 . Housing ° .r ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those are, which we hay expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or ; where addit�hal informatio` is needed to properly assess this proposal . 7-- 4 _ z,_,__ v---/ `)9 s 7 Sig ature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/ RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 271 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of t property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The init application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITYY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X. BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED III WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUI' DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: elL ciyy V APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPRC N ��J7Zl/I DATE L.5-:::/2-—)17 SIGNATU E'9F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 / RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Cita. .4 1P6Mvi DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both Portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth 2 . Air 3 . Water 4 . Plants 5. Animals 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health 8. Land & Shoreline Use 9 . Housing 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation 15. Public Services 16. Utilities COMMENTS: ft 1S i l 1V(01ei2n1 1)RO 14. i-0 ' PN CtL A 5TRUr13G ttZ�m�Gc SST (��Pb12j�1�� �l��BV.0 1 o�c.4� � i'�(�: T 1 mzcsa. To mil- w,0417 �07E o 1._14VOisei t, 5LT31}tei LOrel SL)4)3,F1 tQULeJvy2kD 15.. hp-( �.V lOO _IvoLx)(-4 [ ft'- pUL FT-r(UN5 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature •m Director or Aphorized Representative Date S I-bULD SOrn�. t..N. �! JOr2 C.-16in/h/G e , PRc�U1rJ4,� r 7�'}� GI K Sf/88 \ 1 N `I-ic}WRt W i`..L f sSe, b O+ / RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this proiect because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED CDTile b-I ?.01r ) p u►la ,� Yr'l s�br'►'ldtir✓1 cF !® F-- cp C..I3No c p 'J( 6 Oi\.)se-f (1 )0L.,-E-vivz,4D C o"iL 5.r t l LuusT iliyic0) . t�l�fnY`J� ('k0 P0Steh I �. VU 1c>er" UJ^��11 1 ley �'J'I�`� 1.51 UE,, 'E) C yc+kit. C`✓ �o xo wes S OE cu S rr-.o'c a)(06i 3 1 m.10\)p 11 V b 1 pilot J.�iOl! <.. t\)Y3-acrrt,3t- ICo18rz- MANel vtio 0 \O1,011 a U-u'Y)1',(AJ Prt_OOOb ,) J)1,‘c0 S L 0L13 YvAld) t C Ohnt-ction) TO �V t\- Wa. 0 Coru i ax. tio4,,6(Afig y� n, m vbc mkt) c 42r/ (,U)nE To - r STTCt 1-+IV\VI Clip CODE. SIGNATURE O DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE \ REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT / I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE 68 �e e �1_ _ Erg N/ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 113+`r11 4/ DATE CIRCULATED: 5/10/89 COMMENTS DUE: 5/24/89 Li'Y u - ;;',�/��,�-0 j I; MAY l ti/f 40 ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : ECF;SA 0457 1198g , ' 'Id PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis `�Liu E Lr i V PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Building II BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 27( square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of tl property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The init application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE - SITE AREA .544 acres (.267 to be developed) BUILDING AREA (gross): 2700 square feet. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° o ° ° 2 . Air ° ° o ° ° 3 . Water ° ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° o ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° o ° 12 . Recreation ° ° o ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° 15. Public Services ° o ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: .4.,r9 G✓ e-� -& c ,W-e 1 - -e: �4,16i2 57 - --2 d—e-� e ��.. 7 "� c��� . ":77r-e-e___•- --- . --<€.__ -mow vr1 reef CU a _ , ' 9%Z- ._-,.__3/ We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those are which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or where ad ' information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or 4.Jthorized Representative Date / Rev. 6/ CSC to 1; ede ert- '' RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-045-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . :SA-045-89 PROPONENT: Paul Panagakis d MAY 1 1 PROJECT TITLE: Kalasountas Office Buildidg I 1959 ;� ° Li giCE 11 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of`asquare foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of t property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1: no development is proposed for this residential section at time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application: the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The init application is on file for reference. LOCATION: 701 Sunset Blvd. NE TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE . LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON MAY 24, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPRO (7 A `7'L-e, p - Le Pam'/, -C7 111)(-145-- -, 777 e:;! , .5,04-r-e -4' 5,-s- 674- --&-et,c22,e}---c---- /cf-e-6-)f" M1,--d---‘e----0,--A- c. ---2-,-- ei__ - /627--9 7;� � � �� -` - �,--ems-.-tee- c"---c- DATE - .--'/ E--, SIG�l 'FIIRE F DIRECTO OR AUTHORIZED .REPRESENTATIVE �/ REV. 6/88 6' ® CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION May 10, 1989 Paul Panagakis 341 Skinner Building Seattle, Washington 98101 Re: Kalasountas II 701 Sunset Boulevard N.E. (ECF; SA-045-89) Dear Mr. Panagakis: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed to City staff for environmental and site plan evaluation and is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Advisory Committee on May 31, 1989. The Environmental Review Committee and the Site Plan Review Committee will evaluate your application following Technical Advisory Committee review. If you have any questions regarding the;scheduling of this project, please contact Lenora Blauman of our office at 235-2550. S. ec , Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE/mjp cc: George Kalasountas 701 Sunset Blvd. NE Renton, WA 98055 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 - rte ogOA�tl EP�� . 4teo SEP1s° OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION D E S C R I P 7-1 ® N • • KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING II ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That • .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-I. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-I; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that application; the proponent withdrew it and substituted GE N 'R°A�.aptO`C`A'l�t�'oNtio sN D 7ORce.A D D R E S S: 701 SUNSET BLVD. NE PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION 1 CERTIFICATION I ' ` �V �� �1 � HEREBY CERTIFY THAT �; • THE ABOVE DOCUMENT p I Th ) COPIES OF UMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN 71 e6 (3) CONSPICUOUS PLACES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ON j'Yl ' )0t8c ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, e Notary Public, in end for he State of Washington residing in k �`-`C) , on the - t day of lL a.e_O ,SIGNED : T.OVIICk o 9FD SEPZG OF PENDING . SITE APPLIcATION • D E S C R 1 P T 1 ® N4 • KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING II ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not suppor}tiive of that application; the proponent withdrew it and substituted G E N RUA'�aPtOICA tioAsN D OV.A D D R E S S: 701 SUNSET BLVD. NE • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT .ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND DURING PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: KALASOUNTAS OFFICE BUILDING II ' ECF; SA-045-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for the construction of a 2700 square foot office building on an approximately .267 acre section of a property which totals approximately .544 acres. That .267 acre section, on the eastern portion of the property, is zoned B-1. The western section of the property (approximately .277 acre) is zoned R-1; no development is proposed for this residential section at this time. Environmental review is required for this project because the site has some sections of designated greenbelt. Note: Proponent submitted an application in mid-1988 to rezone this property in its entirety to B-1 and to develop a large office compex on both portions of the site. The Technical Advisory Committee was not supportive of that .application; the proponent withdrew it and substituted the current application. The initial application is on file for reference. GENERAL LOCATION: 701 SUNSET BLVD. NE PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during - - Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact-the, Planning Division n at 235-2550. 1 \•+ ..9, ` -- „ .56. t, I'. ' 749 ri WI/ 11 I :7H 1 T I ,,1.2_ 1 I -. , .: : .1 . , 1,1..,! .. . _ cc 1 ° . . .\\. toe il rcn 1 VT? ! ?na 1 ?47, t91. ({+1:'5 1.: vu pv / ;1.1711 • r� IW ;I 1 R-3 \11 I1. "R-3 R-1 • /is• / `\ 1.0. : '�F 71•'" • o- '' R-3 ., 1 I 99 • !> I R Y l P-t kci a 11J • 1 I 'a/ ' i �0I.1 I .1.. tD_t . , ...•.,•....—.., l� t 1 _14t N _1 S Y �.� t . Lu1I,� ' r'1• it Is,? t Y�3v. :'•'•:: ' \ ww� �;a• 1I11.JJ7 . 1;. N IN ._ ST. •'\ 1,1' 1 . 1. f.sy a � 1„ e • 1 ' \\ 1 x€ .r,. 1 i -� ! 11.7.r. FBI ?. i . I 1 • • • • • • • if_ _____ j t, on.,., name.al eeeee In amertian p �� ,t• a' <aolc taco , on..l li r... r I..._.i • 8 / iNri`P<R.I,wxls ro�°�.• .ea Os w Mon•,.. t 1..M � buP.cl o.w. 6:0 _ _ °r a...r..a.r 04.5.140/645 4. al..!to Nam.Inn.,conlot ar...calm o% I. 5 n �.--� c::�.`:'R•„Vo Win... _ ":r".r._u........ " canrene nu room ton.ann•Oro.ma ten ^�` w•. .. it7 Il`/ ��sr<.+�..co Nln°w a 'a``r,rla.-,.Mar a., x..yawn,.InISS 4floan H V J ° I j c°.raflW,4Andan gc taw° I wl.raw. • 22 2'�F/)AC.fMv/NG ON I`- w I CONS OI.0/e N �'!4/P<C/C<KM RGYR Min . -1 7Dey,�,!�[MayC -CUMc,eo-JuebeE. - 3 s..,SING. )M EN w IFSasia. 'yam'— bM.a...N e.r. T... � rXP/CAL CURS/P,OV NG EOGE C•/ Q Q 'm to tan.r.«, TYPICAL ..,ETA IL. a .aa.a JO I JC ea ub[ti.aaw uw t° N. . e° •f R: R{ar �{ I..ra two.a_ � -- _.r- I i \ •� 11 \I- N \\\_ ` (�. ^ — r --, \\`f\4© I • Letewer men..I. r a.' , 1 ri; ta : •am,...t I ` IMIF - e •ti J Lc.rose c_...... AL _err' i a la. an e.na�--- \ r I ®L� LA. Laub tale e�.sa— / ,� mo" . p I O .0 l••Mrc ANA Nl.C,a ar.1 y / , V WC • ) / I . • I Hra :aa.ro x.ce / ( as. me,,S�a,r mw -. : m.II o r'c e�— \Qc,,, , ( I • r.' taONO.urrra AA... "4iT I/ 1.1 d \ ) 1 . s. oI• • \ ` .. `T r ,r ' I ,• )N.Oulu.G.om�i _ ex__` • me ` �'.�rMe._P«Mewl � 0...2-.='f.:9 lit I. • \ \. • of[...ACr, \2 I \ - r I,:, e S Inr ' a : w' [ Tl` 11 i f ; Iww Pc.c B' . 1 V �, t . • e •\ \ i• VI \ I I NG • rr u. r i • \ -I c,, RIwc.N< r • t� ¢__-____ Cen a� ,J r/ wn.676. ...VWO c 7I [,\ \ \ \ •I'e1- 4✓ l,r ,NOCF e,b w\ \ \1 C L \ I r'�\ I\ \\ !:1Y S\ Y<, _-/= 45nroG.ovr r,oar. /5• • O a - ...`_.__. _k. - \ < a..c' '`, S/TE� PLAN • .._„-_-.,_-_-_——,\—__-- E: S/TE PLAN-NOTES-DE TA/LS UN,.Np.QbVGO RV"i a eWwoc•e WOWGuarv.o r.wescuwe roR<....,w. z.,,, KAL45oUNTAS OPP/CZ d4LD)/YG .h 70, SUNSET G,vO.N.Q. SECT/ON �I /c1�•°•w°.•i.vz Nw KE.7TN STREET °r RCNror,,w<. C Nv. b c r.s6a</3 AD GOWAN., • e•o ely f n.,.. 5 • ,�-ti 11 O �' ITY OF R NTC `4 FILE NO(S); � ' -8" 4. 'cv buiLDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT & -0' S- MASTER APPLICATION - - NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your ::specific type of application(s) are to be completed., (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I [ . TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME . 6Eo/QC a p• KV,450U'%4 FEES ADDRESS REZONE*(FROM,+ TO __) TO/ 5(s)/?$ /3e.Up N.E 01 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ,0ZIP. 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* • / e-n rO n / m/� , G' Q 5 5--- c CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* Vi 4 TELEPHONE SITE PLAN APPROVAL '2.35- • Cf 3 // 0 SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL No. of Cubic Yards: Ei CONTACT PERSON VAFIomCS* • From Section: NAME. • * Justification Required PANG /?QNA6I4Ps; Loag, ADDRESS 1 SUBDIVISIONS: 3 4/ 5'K/AiNcl, LG-O‘,- 0 SHORT PLAT , CITY ZIP Q TENTATIVE PLAT I 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE • FINAL PLAT 6 24 7/92 Q WAIVER • (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME - PLAT NAME: 6eD/Z6c A /ci9,4•4 5®J/1T4 5 r ADDRESS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: 70/ c 4sa - etwp, A� r El PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP ge�7-G/'J/ta4 ° ? p O'� FINAL P.U.D. NANAME:TELEPHONE R 3 S 4 3// 0 Residential 0 Industrial • LOCATION ,t, MOBILE HOME PARKS:Commercial D Mixed 1 PROPERLY ADDRESS _ '70/ g///2$er /$L�I/® A& 0 TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENTf / !C•ZONING PRELIMINARY c'FF/6• 1jLOG y twiC/NEs • e/ FINAL PROPOSED USE i� PARK NAME: o F/CE $LD - �PA/2, //lJ& 0A) NUMBER OF SPACES: / - pde ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SQ. FT. ACRES �--.�- .�T-.—,_. ..._ . AREA:� ;23 E'76,, d7 FrO;SW¢ e/F, / TOTAL FEES /// c/q,ct, , ,—a d.7 a7 8/ DtAp1tasDM F USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PRO ESSING DATE STAMP CM/nC 2F:MToN APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: D MAY 5 1989 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: -71 0 Accepted , - E C E 0 U .E 1::] Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) H DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: 5II D b 1 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: QAccepted . 0 Incomplete Notification Sent On • By: ROUTED TO: (Initials) Building . Design Eng. / Fire Parks Police Policy Dev. � Traffic Eng. Fl=-+ Utilities • fr • Legal description of property (if more space Is required, attach a separate sheet). 4rir / A/vr) 77 5o0r _ i,A-c7S Li-S /5CCo/2. z /4) GooG o'er71017 CoUr> - //,)A Stt//V G To/1 AFFIDAVIT I, C11 c.c,v-e-, P, \ -)O1,c-(LA- , beingg duly sworn, declare that I am Cl authorized representative to act for the property owner,lr owner of the property involved In this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 1 ,--94jt/ ' DAY OF ( ; .(11 19 'a NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, -- f RESIDING AT t i'( �`' .. it) IU ' ) /�� _ _ _� (Name o1�Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) 70/ cSo f.56-T DUG v 120 (Address) • (Address) (7.��TO/� �• f�c)S. (City) (State) (Zip) .35 // (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 plANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON, PAUL PANAGAKIS AND COMPANY 5 1989 CONSULTING ENGINEERS WI AY Skinner Building Seattle, Washington ECEIE TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM To: Mr. D. Erickson Date: May 5, 1989 City of Renton Zoni g Dept. Project: Kalasountas Office Building Renton , Washington 701 Sunset Rulvd N-F. Renton, Washington We are forwarding the following: ( x Attached Under Separate Cover) Drawings Change Order Field Observation Report Specifications _ Request for Proposal _ Miscellaneous' _ Shop Drawings Work Order ' Drawing No. Number-of Copies Title or Description Date " C-1 9 Site Plan 5-5-89 C-2 9 Landscape Plan A-2 9 Architectural Elevations Site Plan 9 City Required Documents for Site Plan Approval Documents Review Remarks: Dear Mr. Erickson: As you may recall this project has been substantially reduced in size from the original submittal . Inthat the project building is one story containing only 2700 square feet it was noted in our meeting of Jan. 30, 1989, that an Administrative Site Plan Review would afford this project to be expidited. Your cooperation shall be appreciated. PAUL PA AKIS A COMPANY PAUL PANAGAKIS • CONSULTING ENGINEER STRUCTURAL AND SKINNER BUILDING CIVIL DESIGN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON April 14, 1989 City of Renton Building & Zoning Department Municipal Building 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: 701 Sunset Blvd. N.E. Site Plan Approval Legal : Tract 1 and South 1/2 of Tract 2 of Harries Gardenhome Tracts , Vol . 34, Page 38, King County, Washington To Whom It May Concern: In accordance with the City Of Renton site plan approval requirements, this letter supplements the required documents and drawings attached. This site has been under the same ownership since 1977, and consists of one piece of land with two zoning designations. The easterly 75 feet (0.267 Acres) fronting on Sunset Blvd. N.E. is Zone B-1 and is presently used for office and parking. The remainder of the land, zoned R-1 , (0.277 Acres) , abuts the Puget Power & Light Co. right of way on the west. The adjoining site to the north was recently zoned R-3. Unimproved N.E. 7th Street adjoins the site on the south property line. This site plan approval is requested for a new one story 45 foot by 60 foot office facility with related parking area constructed on pre- sently zoned B-1 property. The new building improvement contains a pitched roof and general appearance very compatible with residential type structures. The improvements planned for the subject site shall add substantially more landscaping than existing at this time, thereby improving the general environment. The subject site is easily accessed from the nearby major I-405 highway network. The noise level created by I-405 and Sunset Boulevard is not detri- mental to the existing office use of this site and would have more of an impact on other allowed uses at this location. The proposedpLANNINGDIVISION office use at this site will not cause adverse noise impact on the CITY OF RENTON area. r� MAY 5 1989 Ii, 1L R City of Renton vu1lding & Zoning Dept. April 14, 1989 Page Two The site has not been modified by the comprehensive plan and has re- tained the B-1 zoning for some time. The site has been substantially used for office and parking since purchased by this owner in 1977 and, therefore, the use will not change. The greater area contains single residence, multiple residence, com- mercial and heavy industrial zones , plus the I-405 corridor and Puget Power right of way. The surrounding residences are mainly east of Sunset Boulevard. These building are located on a rising topography and are in excess of 200' away from the proposed new building. Thus, the proposed office building should have insignificant impact on the surrounding residential development. No green area or treed area will be destroyed by this project. The present site topography is shown on the accompanying site plan. The site development and landscaping plans indicate improvements to the areas abutting adjoining properties. The Greenbelt area, designated from I-405 to the east side of the power line 'right of way, shall re- main intact. The Greenbelt policy for steep slope sites is not af- fected by the area of this improvement. The subject site is served with public improvements , water, and sewer line, with capacity for this project improvement. The Owner wishes to cooperate with the City Officials , ordinances , and surrounding neighbors , and, thereby has not maximized the allowed use of this property. We feel our proposal will make a very attractive improvement to the area without adverse effects on the surrounding properties or environment. The project is scheduled for construction this summer and should be completed approximately 6 months after commencing work. Sinc ly, a' _ P ul Pan gakis , gineer cc: Mr. George Kalasountas , Owner • OF R4, 4' ECF: O4S -ai 4% z City "': 645_� ® of Rentono [SA- om- 11-0(1.3-8e,), ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 0�TF0 SEPTP Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: .Ij 4LA S®ti.vixs c9ffiC / LO6 2. Name of applicant: 6F.�/ fj-11-4-50(J,tJ774 S 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact-person: f1t1 R4/4-6n/ /s, Eli& , 5f=//r//v /Z &(-D C9- S& 417Z 447 9(Jo/ � Z �`� ��� 4. Date checklist prepared: //� � S. Agency requesting checklist: G,'ry Bic ,e&--YJ j d "1 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): "Wrilco/AT C i 57710c77e9-7 (1/2044 PE m/T PLANNING DIVISiop CITY OF RENTON NEcEilvE MAY 5 1989 L 7. Do you have any plans ilk future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Nv 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ffl7/ < 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. N � 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. /T %LDGiU41 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 5n4LL ©f L /3-pG , R 1 go p.515/ ew 2 5`re- a/= //6/1 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 70/ 4/s /3z-a�J,� , ��, �o� I ',4 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one); 4101 rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. f4/�y_'C'L ify/GP4/44 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. A/ C2 a . t e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or t grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. ti0 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: /l'LLy A4,wsc4 5 cx- 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air, would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. v W/cli-4iz Cx/ sr b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? gi,v4-cewr 'k)f's c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 5 /90z-r 6-'74 $rps, 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Ai 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. AI0 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. N/4' - 3 - 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. i /V4 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. ,Q'2 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. AWE 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. RA/A) Wel l22 (49Z-e-e/a--P 4 g ,, y Ptcp. i) j24/L G'//V ,T / rl /-ESP S g 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. - 4 - d. Proposed ruuaasures to reduce or control surfacb, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: �E2 Ca/ i0E�/ 7-5 P02 97-0/1g1 Pe-fr-27n-70,-t 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: o deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other o evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other o Shrubs grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? 04S5 ft/01E7 pep a o Go(77,4 GOnoscyym c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. /(JOe X/U®GtJ/0 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. '725Q /6)&0/0 c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N 0 ' . - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: / 04 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 6677, A/ c1tr$ 6;1 /1E4r b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: e r nT(S4'' C(fT ,? v/ i r-S rose 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? r/Wp c N o`Se-$ F26,i /fr'w f'S - 6 - 2) What types cod levals of noise would be creates uy or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 512tr fe/ln efN4772t1 not ; -7Am ra 4p#1 t-on 7 7 m7-P.AFFkgr ,,it p No/$c 5 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Qom, z. /®sc-af/,J 6— 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Dff./G- kt-10 /? e /AJ — b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. /U0 • c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? c) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?107 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. A/® i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? NPW k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: / v.. . - 7 - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: #4s , J' /�4'G Cir Pbxefr ` 12.00 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. /4,4 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: / "nt 4# 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. VieO/ �G" 5/71 g94, e� C,W#/# ;//7d/1 / F b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Non - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: /O9?/ a6. 4//' /LJ6- ap pcc .549 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? �oAir b. Could light or glare from, the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? /moo c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Ai or /E62$ - 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? / WiT � 44K /f c, b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. ni 0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: /VA- 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. /1�'> 0 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. 1141/7&---- c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: fi 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. oer b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? �eT ex4Velit.) c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many-- would the project eliminate? • 'A ,e///.)G s�4c . d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). ©/t/ - 9 - • e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. tiv f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 7IO,a eero '////6- S7?-4 6 =. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. //0e 7,4e_, / /& t0G/G b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 61,67 �1 Gl/i✓G�� LTG • 2G14 /7 9,5 77 2 16. Utilities a. Cir = utilit'- rrently available at the site: electri ' natural ga - ephone - - s-• c syste , : - b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. �����/' G ��� �2 G Proponent: /24,z7e. Name Printed: 05:9 K.91.41-S.N)g?ZS U Apied" - 10 - in 7e 11-8-84 • D. SUPPLEMENTAL ET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (This sheet should only be used for actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs. Do not use this sheet for project actions.) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the 'elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous sutstances; or production of noise? /UDe{ i.. d� /Cc= /-�--,o - USE-4 6 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 5Po6- Pe7a22 7%2I ) 6".7l 5/1a c5c'op a21517Z Ucfld7a p cj7c S 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? PZM P7r," Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: (-02 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? NOR/AC- 6fFfct- -P 6- PN,9 ,a rOI71 'S co/9 Of ern 5efYdt7� Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: '4rf 7-41 Co/ES 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 000 C CV/5T7t()C77(P1 54 riS P - c®roc--� - 11 - • 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? L44)w Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: (5 ) 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: enb-- 6fr; 1/0 J7o/�, qg, 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. A—'oitJ /1110e ) SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any • declaration of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: 6Ef' 6E f9L41.S614)177;4' 1"4i-4 Name Printed: a' i .� fT/��i����f� S4661- - 12 - Form No.1402(1/70) ALTA Owner's Policy Form B—1970 (Amended 10-17-70) ¢S .S AMER / • • • • POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY • • First American Title Insurance Company SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B • AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS HEREOF, FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A, and costs, • attorneys' fees and expenses which the Company may become obligated to pay hereunder, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: • 1. title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as stated therein; • • 2. any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title; 3. lack of a right of access to and from the land; or 4. unmarketability of such title. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, First American Title Insurance Company has caused this policy to be signed and sealed by its duly authorized officers as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A. First American Title Insurance Company 4; "' BY PRESIDENT • S',,F C i R" 24. 'V ATTEST SECRETARY PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON D MAY 5 1989 . , E. D 99697 INDORSEMENT Our No. 36716 — __-- Attached- to Policy--No. D-99697 Issued by First American Title Insurance Company 1. This Indorsement shall be effective only if at Date of Policy there is located on the land described in said Policy a one-to-four family residential structure, in which the Insured Owner resides or intends to reside. For the purpose of this Indorsement the term "residential structure" is defined as the principal dwelling structure located on said land together with all improvements thereon related to residential use of the property except plantings of any nature, perimeter fences and perimeter walls,and the term "Insured Owner" is defined as any insured named in paragraph 1 of Schedule A and, subject to any rights or defenses the Company may have had under said Policy and all indorsements, such insured's heirs,distributees,devisees,survivors,personal representatives or next of kin. 2. The Company hereby insures the Insured Owner of the estate or interest described in Schedule A against loss or damage which the Insured Owner shall sustain by reason of: a. the existence at Date of Policy of any of the following matters: (1) any statutory lien for labor or materials attaching to said estate or interest arising out of any work of im- provement on said land, in progress or completed at the date of the policy,except those liens arising out of a work of improvement for which the insured has agreed to be responsible. • b. the removal of the residential structure or the interference with the use thereof for ordinary residential purposes as the result of a final Court Order or Judgment, based upon the existence at the Date of the Policy of: (1) any encroachment of said residential structure or any part thereof onto adjoining lands,or onto any ease- ment shown as an exception in Part II of Schedule B of said Policy, or onto any unrecorded subsurface easement; (2) any violation on the land of enforceable covenants, conditions or restrictions, provided that this coverage shall not refer to or include the terms, covenants and conditions contained in any lease, sub-lease, or contract of sale referred to in this Policy; (3) any violation of applicable zoning ordinances to the extent that such ordinances regulate (a) area,width or depth of the land as a building site for the residential structure; (b)floor space area of the residential struc- ture; (c) set back of the residential structure from the property lines of the land; or (d) height of the residential structure. c. damage to the residential structure resulting from the exercise of any right to use the surface of said land for the extraction or development of the minerals excepted from the description of said land or shown as a reservation in Schedule B. The total liability of the Company under said Policy and all indorsements attached thereto shall not exceed, in the aggregate, the amount of said Policy and costs which the Company is obligated under the conditions and stipulations thereof to pay;and nothing contained herein shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said Policy. This Indorsement is made a part of said Policy and is subject to the schedules,conditions and stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. First American Title Insurance Company BY PRESIDENT BY \. / `1, ASSISTANT SECRETARY • WA-90(5/15/76) INDORSEMENT • Our No. 36716 — Attached to Policy No. 1,9.9697 Issued by First American Title Insurance Company • The Company, recognizing the current effect of inflation on real property valuation and intending to provide additional monetary protection to the Insured Owner named in said Policy, hereby modifies said Policy, as follows: 1.• Notwithstanding anything contained in said Policy to the contrary, the -mount of insurance provided by said Policy, as stated in Schedule A thereof, is subject to cumulative annual up •d adjustments in the manner and to the extent hereinafter specified. 2. "Adjustment Date"" is defined,for the purpose of this Indorsement,to be 12:01 a. m.on the first January 1 which occurs more than six months after the Date of Policy,as shown in Schedule A of the Policy to which this Indorse- ment is attached,and on each succeeding January 1. 3. An upward adjustment will be made on each of the Adjustment Dates,as defined above,by increasing the maxi- mum amount of insurance provided by said Policy (as said amount may have been increased theretofore under the terms of this Indorsement) by the same percentage,if any, by which the United States Department of Commerce Composite Construction Cost Index (base period 1967) for the month of September immediately preceding ex- ceeds such Index for the month of September one year earlier;provided,however,that the maximum amount of insurance in force shall never exceed 150% of the amount of insurance stated in Schedule A of said Policy, less • the amount of any claim paid under said Policy which, under the terms of the Conditions and Stipulations, re- duces the amount of insurance in force. There shall be no annual adjustment in the amount of insurance for years in which there is no increase in said Construction Cost Index. :, 4. In the settlement of any claim against the Company under said Policy,the amount of insurance in force shall be deemed to be the amount which is in force as of the date on which the insured claimant first learned of the assertion or possible assertion of such claim, or as of the date of receipt by the Company of the first notice of such claim,whichever shall first occur. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as extending or changing the effective date of said Policy. This indorsement is made a part of said Policy and is subject to the schedules, conditions and stipulations therein, except as modified by the provisions hereof. First American Title Insurance Company BY PRESIDENT BY Q....41 ASSISTANT SECRETARY • NOTE: In connection with a future appi;,-ation for title insurance covering said land, reissue credit on premium charges (if applicable at all) will be allowed only up original face amount of insurance as stated in Schedule A of said Policy. FA—11 (9-30.74) Clwngr Inflation Form No.1402—A ALTA Owner's Polley Form 8—1970 SCHEDULE A Total Fee for Title Search, Examination and Title Insurance $ 182.75 Our No. 36716 Amount of Insurance: $ 35,000.00 Policy No. D_99697 Date of Policy: July 25, 1977 at 8:30 a.m. 1. Name of Insured: GEORGE P. KALASOUNTAS and NELL KALASOUNTAS. 2. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: AMOS E. HUSELAND, as his separate estate. 3. The estate or interest in the land described in Schedule C and which is covered by this policy is: FEE SIMPLE ESTATE. I � • Form No.1402—C • Western Region ALTA Owner's Policy — Form B—19-70- -- --- — -- -- --- SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason Of the matters shown in parts one and two following: Part One: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,claims of easement or encumbrances which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose,and which are not shown by public records. 5. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights,claims or title to water. 6. Any lien, or right to a lien,for services,labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. Part Two: 1 . GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1977 Amount Billed: $406.43 Amount Paid: $203.22 Amount Due: $203.21 Tax Account No. : 311990-0005-08 Affects: Tract 1 2. GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1977 Amount Billed: $174.18 Amount Paid: $ 87.09 Amount Due: $ 87.09 Tax Account No. : 311990-0010-01 Affects: South half of Tract 2 3. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Seller: Amos E. Huseland, as his separate estate Purchaser: George P. Kalasountas and Nell Kalasountas Dated: July 21 , 1977 Recorded: July 25, 1977 Recording No. : 7707250078 PLANNING DIVISION Excise Tax Receipt No. : 420585 CITY OF RENTON MAY 5 1989 !I " • Form No. 1056.4 All Policy Forms SCHEDULE C The land referred to in this policy is situated in the State of Washington , County of King and is described as follows: Tract 1 and the South half of Tract 2, HARRIES GARDEN HOME TRACTS, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 34 of Plats, page 38 records of King County, Washington. Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. ... • / (--;---7 , . a1 W v 3 oC N. . 9 Tt/ W3 o_ W / ;RircEj"7 IiiN. S Q 6 W * ir 4s amass A NI H / ;. 4 / f, L/ N11) I N I pC, I / II I. V/C N/TY LA/NI ( N /"= 200` PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON MAY 5 1989TIN, N , 1 ..... __r___,., • ... , . , , , , ,. !--L— 1 i .• I,•• .,_ I._ ,r--' i._ ...: . .o\... ., V\ L'" 0 I 71 1---t•I‘r,9.., ...d.,.:1,4-„... I .. • u ., 1 • . • i Q ' ,,e , i - • Ix I, •! ff r CC WASH II r� . ° c ! I i I I ( r--� �' • • ti1 I J I.... 1 -'4 299 lNH j 2IT1 rnA 24j I Z'Sr` 7'1 •b ZtI I s s T" B- I _ 11 n I' -ram..►{ i I \'L7 �� v � �: � if � � , .. N E - ,_ • 17 J w�-W HR3 R3 i. / .// ..e / le I , •r. . , /e, 0_ .\. 1 ., .‘ ... , ; ,..,,,,, , ‘ ,.,............ vo. , ./../...„ z.___. . ._ / . i P i ..L\..\,\ . a r � SJ•Imo.••••• •=0•77 I0 . .• . .• . . 0.) .:.: (.., : , R a h .. �— R-4 rl_ 5 I • .• p- .. P— \ ., -ki- 1 • .0,,,, °'- rt ° ' a4 t I r I I r, r �Y• ' 7TT ,• }I ,.) R-3 'el •, e.I.. . ..: •i•I.1 , 1� ... ate •Li N y ,) apt �-r,- �.;.,I I_ II 1 S1- ; ' . • - ...IIII ,II ,y �:.s.L � o tom.+I 5b, t'.'1 1 r•3•0 , :..5:1 i._:: ;f1"-,*„...„...,..�—r- n , +... • J W , ;-14 r. 1,1 ., 1 . ,1, W.. �1 .„,. a I e 1,r . e r,. a �_� • - •I , ' \\ N E^��� "I, ..r'�:,�. f ; -�, i it 1 'T1. i•1- e ....,..,..... N \ \ \ '' '4- �• , j Jam' .I.1 i,JL' I l' ,i • • .�DAI/A/F MA J13 • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON IMAY 5 1989 P .( . . , . , . . . .2.11 ........--V75-'0."77-17-', •--•.'1"7-e",'-':',..'"••:" '•••;,••••;••••':,•:•i.•'.::•:.'.• / . . Revised April 1985 1 1., .0 '..4. -'' '.C2.'' 4.-7•'':,. .5S' f'.0.4.".•;•...-•r('r.:!....c.7?•"' '''' .'". 1111r • •-,-:,...• .•irl !••••f:'7,5...''.';'774, t. ' ••• , A •o :• , •o c, • 4,K•Z,••......._ .. ;1-1 aga • "%. "Ii,\ ._ ...n.t.:',;.',:•.:;•:•:&:- •-•• ',..'" .%• ' .44': ' • • 7.,. .. .• .. .1 4'\.4:4•:, %- A-VO• % ,•4;.•:.1 • 4 r'114.:::.A . ... •"" NeiN •:•:•::.#sr'''•••! - •a.., LAKE I. ,.• •...„. .:... ...:„......„.. ''.1,•.'.Ec:•„• flp• :....;..:.: ,..... '..f.. • . i '.; ...V //011:::j :•',,f,,;,.`..',: if., 4.,,‘ t ••. . "4t„ li tA,gillW•ASHINGTON % s , •-i•i,•es...:•.'.....%..2 ,`.r...1..7.rq.i.- :;'_'...'..• s...-1.;..'i...' H .. --,iloi.i_,;•-.0-;-;.- 1 . • _ .„. 1i1..r• 1,?-, it .0000 .0.%.. .00o; lifi. : 1=11. -•••••• IIII.&.::•,•,\z„ ,,,- • • • • • • . D 1 ,41iii ., • • • • • • 4,10 er-ilk, :::::•• ::::::•:•:•:• Ir.-, .. ,_ . MI ;•;,'•• 111.1.1111EN „,111 111- 111•_;o;o_:1MM111I=MEME7 11lmr1 aa,/ 7\0•v.g.00°...g0:00o0,g.-7o0 0g•...••••. -••1•11•''•..-••---•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.\•••••• •- "• .r i•i*i*.i:.i:.i. Pr0iej---.•,1:-si-s:s:i,o,.11.,[1-i.:::::i::i:::-:Th::.:o:t aiil'._.it".,.l,.p,.i,j,.I.5•./,.1i.g•..1..i.jM : , `• i::11 . .1- .;ogg. • • • • • • • • • • • • .01,. i . :• • • • • • • • • • • • • !lilpiA .::: 000000 • e • • • • • e • • • a iii1ai • • ,. ::::::::::::::. •Lco•L n igg gg:Immo . :g0gogoz0g.., • • • • • ft • • • • • ; •••• . .i*i:::i: f 1.111 gra 1• .. ,... ..0,90g0g0g0; ' • • • 0 • • • • • • •_ _ ;• :iiiiii• 1.11111.11.. 1,0600000,000, t • • •• •••• ••••••• •••• ••••• .,.:., AM. 7.:..-t,11-11 I it. ,.-s- t1:00082g.lt,\,-Fieb.po • • • • • • • • • •• • ;. 11141 AS:To.• - s EIL.11.111 •Wogogog9:1,t 9 • • • • • • _.0,•_ :e, • .0 Po IMMIIII -*Ix 70gogog•og.9, ••s• •••• 4_0 •_•_•_• ••••••••,;,j. . C;n:.: •Zo04110e ':..: 1111%31.1.126. ."'" :: ::iiiiiiii: • • •••.• •••••11.• ••••••66.• •'•'„ .\ 111111110110 it II: '.. • • • IITIIVIF7MINIMM 01.640P9ggiiii; •k, ,••••••• r... ii • • • • • • • • • v.. •, .. •111.1 !!:gO;OgO115:1111.L11 II 1111 ,?..411V.-....ggligegg: . •••••••I • • •••••• :'3••, A p . . .00.00..000.,..., ,. _ __ . • • • • • 311ICN1i:11;\•0 1 1.\ P0.,714i1,•.'...llsNa ft...•:..'„1•r.&,.j.)1•iI1"%N. . \I k L1r'4i111 ia„ia1ij/.1.4:/l l:,,1 8zg05g,g.,-gi.N0g. .gggg°000igi1i 0ggg0sg-00e°0eaii.0ggg0gs0ng00g°0i0ioigg0°ggggs2.0e0°00Foi,g,003gg*00g0°0n.:g.,Og00..S0000:,0g 40x,Vt..0.0,•iA,t.g.•;00„.._•?a•..Eg0...A,.•,g?..•.,:'4....I.4,:gv7N„•.`.-L g002.°SWi7•.1'.',i10-1,i;: 1,7f,1• 1 i.r••.:i.•I,mCot.lh••rs,i-.••-[''• •.-•i". ••i,•g riilollrj•5 1 J:g I1 O..iia 1f q •,.k•1 ird,3•e•c e,gt....4i)e.4e1l•'" 1..I)i1•,:,A'1a•:'•.•.\?:,5.,' (r1•',1I:10.* i:i.i„..i..i.:•l.••i:gl:••i.•:i"'i:•e.•:•r,••i•74•:••:i•7ml:•7•::i•!.:.:•7•.•i...•:§::•L.:.•i':•;p•m7.:•:g•.:7:••,••i•i'i 0C':.°000000°0,.3°0000i.r°0°0t:0004°0°0%o°0000.o;0:...0.00.0000°0.7•0'009."o3 : '000g0-0-0 • • • ., • 0: m • • • e 0A . . . 10: se . gogo; 6 m 0 o, 4 :6 o%000.0°0.00000•0000'0•009.io 0 00:000%0l '•00:•10:••.....0000.•.0.:1:•:::00000 900 00 f - - - 3: - ::::::::v!rR! Ar . °%°1 °0°000000:Cilc: ImPf Nkc ...11-tir 00. ..killicr i0;0T-0-0,--.1. RIR.. Mgr I/ ,tn:'.• 6:.°0::°30'...1.'..::.:iiiiiiiiiiiiMilii ••°•°•:!°°-:0711°°:°::::°10i ‘,.;•,.{f;, Loo 0•0.0000000 1 ,;;;;;*,,t!.. .....,..ri, ,..,.., •,, T, ------1 wl,11::L.t,0g02,0,20g0,00: „II,.Email"NY., ..•n.cy ..... te ..-, a f3. ,. mom ,:.8,..„ •• -mum c:72_°°°°°°.°L3°°,1 mil'..••Ili iiiiiiVON-H.600-ofr'••!,.-'..,..sh.... ..-':....4telv't\-...-.;;..--,.CZ ..,....b:4. , :i:::::i:::i:::m:i.: .-.r-',"'''•-• , •1111i1 11 11114 ‘var/ '......;x iird:11;;;;;;;HI .o0o...c.:;,/.-- mi...., . Mig. d›,x': , ..,................... .n',„,,,i'c,.jk•'''''r•••.',• );-NATI O nom, simmimilma... • .... .. ' ?• ., b:::•,4 '. :::::::::::::::::::::::: i',-,,..,-.L..•:v.s.!...•,..•, ,,) , ' ---mmi.•V.."zu . ''',t.•W ,' '•:•:::::::::::•:•' ,;',-,),,':-.5`...!,;•;4'•-":;'.":". ;:•,•,,,i..::,:(.7!),et - •451,...1.1M11111 __r__, ...0131:111,t9 1/11.19111111121r ,.-..''LL •_,..•'V rs`,• ..i i 1....• A.,. . •ti".5;;,,_ 3,'..(2).;.. ,,;, `•'•:./'••;;;:,,r2-P''.•;',.55!.,:?)":41 1,..,..••*. irflls;• . 0...014. ...0..".1,1:::nriel 1`.:';•,F;'",•, ••,,,,KA..,:a•,,,.!(.:Ci';',):,,,Y.;:„:;: ,r,.- ...- ,• .,.-P.--i••••••.:0'`.::•,:••,.,.•0: :,....,•,.t'..., •:re kreek%" list7:40.':!, .:.fP.,..:....,...,:-.,3",s n. ': - • '''''1•:.':::v..)''''' ..- iitt sou murinum• ry,ey..41.,•(.+%ny••,e)eif...-',?J.,...,..,-;).r.-... 1 '0.'r),• vr f'hes.••(. vomit. .../.••...4•(:',5-,•.' NIL, :g1.04;755aEligillg •• •n.!_;1:•.:?‘%1...:,,,:. ,:••::f0,,,.1:0•. •. , ... ./.0.`!".i ----• ri, ••••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:........:•: Ammo -__--__-_-_ - • "•••:•:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.,:::;:::::::::f A murs•:-..i.o, ....0:45 az MN' V _-_-_-_-_-_ _."t3r..,. _‘ ". ''.*::::i:::i:::::i:i:if::;:i*i:i:i::, INN'WOLREM ; ;2 ';O:'•"i's:(3,,:, .i.I, '•(.z. 44,41 7.". .r...›,?.. .:,...4....f.74.'„, - - - ----- *::::::::•.::::::::::Ki . .7, .3) ‘2....,..!.6..:::,..1,..t i.n.7 0..:.:'7.1..::.$....4f.),0.:,• ...; .q:'."'''''`.'.‘V: ' ... '....' • "ripehniN it P°A7 k .."''..,.c:..,-,.., . • . . .. ..,,,...... , =-10E-Rira------- •. ... N..:.,:cearcd Ar. . 1 ...,,,,,:.,..,,,,,...v,,,,,,,,,,,...,....f, aNi•nil - CV- .. 11 %fill z;:iii!M:§.,iii:inq•Awl!' -,4 "I.'`,..s'''.3%,..Ak•• AL tiall • Ilk. '0"t7y,;.-11ii.;'1.P:'Li.;0:.:%`11...r.('';),',3 c.3.";,Q!...,.:•,.;-, !•- --- s''IA•:'s.,I,V,...•:•02 t•':^:P..---";;')(.•- •rk:.. . ..:-----_-_-_-_-_ -------- _-_-_ 1.°o° •1:1000.0.00:000000.. ..,;..;i3tiv.,:i:,tv,.s.....< :‘,..,,,,,..,,,:si:::..,,,,,,.....,,,!,,...\.4„..n ire. . ••:::c71-1m. il I ,, ,,, , "3-'`:';'ej.( .i.(1.P:4);1•,`';','`...?..,::.•,',., .....\,•<:-... --..,P •.?..°,1.,:..-AI" •,..lt.4„,,000, .•,,-..,-,• - .. c'. ••. nown....-:.- , ,t,;..,•..,., M .7Paki7t:. 7 '0;F:::r:ii,.:‘,;;;77...6.!.;',..:31,,i;v".-•%;•' ',-*'.'A-' .',1 '.''' .y. •...,,T..,...'C•. ,..,.. .‘, ..,, ., ,,.. „C. . 6 L.)3'_:,•!L3,`,..i.....,`V/.7.•c'',''',6'Zi......- ------------ ----L.------ •• ...Mille I -- --- -.----- ''' . I V"e.w-e,..0,0-% .•o%•":,','•,.., ..1,.,t;..,,.4,v,. -, )...... ---=-:-:-: i : ___ ::::•:•:••• ' 'e:.?,• . . •• ,......„‘.:•:"•%•• `1 %.• •• ,..,• '•4?,:.:•,,'•,../•31) .Or: 51).:';-'t•.... .nz, .:: i::. t.i):• ,.. :-.,"•;• : .'s.. •3 It 441' .. 'et;04:3.,i 010 t 69:: ---_-_-=--- -wcrfliiallrjogg ilkFrW 1 1 k• ..:::•:::•:•:::•:::::::•:::•:•:::. ' ‘:.",;tv'..b.....:•.:•::, n." 0•00• 6' .f . ." •,..., ,,. •::::::::iiii:::igM •0 000 0• •••-- - ' • t.:.:•:.....,........; •000000 ;,3, "•\:,..._,...- ‘' 000 ,.. .,.I_ •- nue, .,,..,„,.,...,...... •00.... , ..:.:.:.:.:.::::::::::::::::::::::„.. .„ )0•.. -2-::-- -i-- op: _9 , 000• ..,. .00. .,„,..,:...:.:::i,.:.*:::i ,,,,,. : ••..- -- -4%4.2' I • • -- -- -.---.1111Mig_g_ MIL1M014 • .•,, ,"t. U..:"1".%•?;s e...t....: o o o• ,..:..1\000000. ', 1:..•::„.,:`,„•••-•-•-• ,:•,,,,A. • A .,.... iatt --'-•-_-_-11Fr'EL&Swe ei_§. ...% •••.::::: i::::::::::••::::::::::::::•,' .,-,,,,•t;,,,,,„•,;.) ,‘0.. ,; ...1'.. ._•-. g , , . t....i.-,a - • .:::::::::::::::::::::::: .•,. ••:.•• . .. .• a° `Nt. • IL , 1 I31311 /----------- ----- . IP ' Ilit::-'Z::::'. ill•'04:°°::°•°•••'\ N 6 •;L:- ••• , 1 ay.v.I.NE : ----7----- --.--- 3'.7..• i \ 4 . . ; .... ,. INIIIIIMIIIIIMI .., _ -- 3•C.., 3 0 ::::::::.. `r;; ;:, .......... • a I •Nionoms, f„.- 0 o •:•:•:•:•:•:•:•• ,:,• I,. iant„ \Lei t§:r., • • ' 4Itotr•4441:•,'i 89 ii.... ''. - --b f fi ail: •-'----'-'''..?' ;,,,,, -_ -_ •0.0___ I,1,-,... ,0 0 ••:.::::::::::::.. A,:, I ?o°0° lit.!:.:!:!::.1::.,•••..,,, e.',.. inn iiiii'r *--7.--=.1-,_-:--:-::-..:-o 0 0 o.:::--_--:-_i:12::,, )o o 0 ...;; :::.::.:i:!:!•;;:i.,e,:,_ 'API . Wei:AP "••-" ••" .... , Ili ear „ a,1::;:r,.-• 7 q 03.333MBIEC PALL /IS V_MU t.• __ 1000000 o I. l ��, "i cc _ CIA, 8 44 • e5 e - `r /_ ...6 I 43v.6� 25Q - 9Ty 8,� I 6..44. d a 70 _ 93 5+�, �—, N E (6 •._ -s- 4,4 s://\ 16 1'ff).: 67 A: 37ft.O �� yb �s4 ; 70°-;- 1'. 14 ., ,�, 0 7cfri a 8 ° IOg : I j 4 ��m � Oil 4 o i, 000 : ..1 48 64.a 6 l 53 O. p� - � G� (410 4( g 0 12 .�, 5 4 b 2�3 6 pre ,5 9s.6 10 _ - n t W'TES EX1'Sr6/ 0 l 9°/. " s W ``4 .335 $p' 24 _ 23 22 3/9.4 .' /oz� � 0. 1 \ \ / of1E 71T ,�/47, to ~ $ III `c z zni„ �' s ,N 'i o� 8: 10 es. el,+�3. v. 2 0 30 ;;i;46-P#$ 3 ss7i\ 1/ -.4 10 ti 1 z6o_79 • - / / h O Q ass ,i� 8�°k 1st 2oey 7 ,.:.; +� . 80. /, Z6 `` '1634 °, v,ems ��' .o► 8b ° b 2 c �, 1 a IZ 3� \�... ^ , rt.. ::'�t 81 I 9 6 a 5� r 1 \\\\ 70.14&-Cb a 1,43 7 z (09, � 9z l p�Z . Bp o Sp ►���R°i W dam�= si, 1G3 � 9�fe Ppa ►����`� m a b 14a0 �I8 1 l a• ►���••� W r �g63 �1 co 13+ooZpp � ^ +,��� 1pSN >Z.;.,� ., m t c"�5 11 5 04: 6... -"i- , ----:rA. ir N t‘i .'''40 . 74'37 1 60 5� e i..• h it, <v8 °° T���J r� O ��-1 W 6g c5' 60 �i':. R1 �'l4. I 69 (6G g 56.6 $ lu c ti n ( • 4"--*: . "4.4_All M vim%'.' 30 30 �1�� I y • 3 ''�5`�-.-6- ., ils- . •,- s, 0 • -G 84 - \, \ ,11 6 r0� 1 p 1, I l I, "- `° N 89-30-4 ,37 W m ya.og z , 1L)k1324.48 - -- - 21 ---[ ' - \ • 1- CO /?Tf 4(556SS2f *IP �� S E 8 - 23 - 5 J• ` X'126 - TRACED REPL • MENT MAP, K.C. BR K WN CD ' .e/i'1/8 = /Wel) //CMS:C.A71/4 udy ' 0 impRoi E7trsRR r� n a sC `I . r 1� �'- c7'd` , "�i-n'Cq -w/wa• af':O/-tvoa/e s�i>- -- LL• ' �, Kt;v� C�EJr(TX.is�Ea a (9«�. �w:reM ..:;...: :. ;:;.} --�- • •t �I' •4 S%>.�a.2 t/ d:�..�e:s CITY 0� RET Y �,_ • —b OP�RT_ ILL. M r ¢� •RGG04E1iCD • -ir><OIt1�•s �- 08 i rsa 1 _ cir414.10ir �/'i'iwr! 7�i-�' •4C._ Q i TO SEC it 11 •�:fy . `i .14 sCC.CON. .EXO-S BE 0 �� +z�r , ;4,. : ___.M l �.. ��• n c? t' •, •T,)-I �- AEC't:�st=.f+v COP. I,�(4�M -if ^ -7----- � — & . T 1 V .. a^ . .- • rMIP1 �ltr =iE IM - i J f S ma - 1 �T;_T • t� Y '-T^`[D�(ts`tr +ls. . •CO M PU O- 04. �'.'` I Pt _-i _ " _ S �. III- ,,,r' Ari` 1 R _ZU R _ v-AkdaZPr c��L 3 --4 l_ • _ __ +ter • _ a • �. _ A • 0 U g y ; s/ Sew r: - I . " - T `. 4 - J E fiS,•-T- To vS f0.S•ti 4 - _ T'_ z r> 1 r Y r ,.;E:r E+[ C�=r +rt To Sr 3'S JF C�GrR•_�y M1 s.{ • / ° / {`" ( . - • : A D NI I N I . { •4 ._--, 13 2 4.N - _ ►� [' 4 _I ° ' ��+oa 'c.. Re�Y/OVYtHc ws//vc3 'R c•cr — -- ` ! V L 3 5 o I t I _ •_.s� -4 il 6 �f w v w.+sN•M t�'� 3 y •3 r `fv1 sys rys/s• - . z.. »-,. a - ,- 04, —N89 Zg'3c�.. �- • `- _.# 7I f L2'4- ! 1t �{ -,- S !,M Sa,/f.4,nr ES/•�- ;..4 '„G �1 - Uc-aa 1 ^ 5ce80 of 41,0 ,4 �"ji-i- J6 Y"11 �! ��v. \ H 6 -� r • qL a w <�� _ :2as. • h 3 50 11 41 .,a.. " sa �� 3o 2/ �—c. (2 s , M�•"•09 \`� 2� • f ( S - . �— E I• /a V 30 1 of to 'K' 5zzi�y p ia' j i •mr3=mom H ( Q 1 �� .� ,� + /0 518.0 _ %, a09Cr" `�` �:Itir or ja L, '9 0 �253' .f r`I ` \J .. H a Ar.�->> w /d • ;.750 N S,c,3 MI \ \ SIt • k k• 44-dt 4>Y o',_• ) t `; r{.... 7 , ' ..ZPs 52-ta0 of \ \ /Z .. • ' a •,� - / • 2 ,,I 4o.V ( 'a7 •=9"a - • I /6 /JGy 71 .S �f'� \ _ J 3' 19; �I��i °' ��►�� ol� �1�4•164',.. d7ij'-o3-3G - /Q - 33• ... ��� '; \ � y \ ' L ' ! .4. ""••_4q1 .731J G`y.-2 leG.- 4�I� 4 ..�i ,:!`• Z 13.E s� `� `mil ?.. 4 i ti .wC7 of 3 V \ r , f` 1 �3F : 1 Z 4I'y m T •\ \ + • �l, ' ^ F ( 7B.>rS919'•si=ar64p,4 13/ ^I 'n 1juy h 1 .m :- 305 •,o f .L s 15,:i Nt ...1- .S4 4..?! .. \ - : I • • ‘I I f... . \ 4. 0. b _ �+. 1. /V17� 1 4 1 Q i •�3 S7 5 v i t w� - - �� ,• 7 o� 4 C•_ �' ,� ., \\, i ►�j�j� ^ 1 ../ •!Vih kP L''. `t}0 +, 80.74 S7 ' \ X y�7 .b V 4 `t ' I Vr • • • �_ ��� f1, (-- 0? ?se4a az1W+ 4� k�°f�;` a0��cj'�zr •�`\` �pgA� N p. • .�- - V', r� 4'-'i "'� yr > n,Ta �r' - lc z9\ v/ci 0\1° • Plat S •s14\ sc. = 9 \�� - \ 1 �" "`I • i. :% rl I 1i„1` �•,' .:r C��! 28!, 4 � qil• , �•Sa Mows \\ \ So r Q /� ((+yl f+ $�` o • E s P i ° Z \� Z 7 o�0 t0a ' �5�/ �, . G-- - `, i•VW T� 'o ( 3S7 -• �Ia '8 �\, `^` r. ,� • ZS.� - 5131-O,�r • , \ X P3" r :a::: � 52� a - -t"1 .\ \ • -1:: _i. :.:. v 5.. 9 j Asa �a.s g r it .. .7s.. , , ei. _ ‘ � - ,` �r'?9ja �oS� ;.. ��} ' I``p �3. °! /a =seas 4 rN �L � 24 ::,-._.:. :•• 1:-H-'..--t..--:--\ •• N 43 °,os.:. 6-1-...',' i' ti �) gill :°- 4 0 1 , o L 1f 7 �t . _ ti �r t z� ,00:: = o ,, o� /s 2 " - �a p r-N ? ' td. iii 9 ta 5 330• ypo ;`'�° �ta� !• '6 .: 'a. \t .... \'''' _..L._."\\t.._.:\ - ." • ` / ._ �. .� .... _. � ., _ .. ._- J� • - _ � tya ems`2 l ?� 0 � h"ill w/ D 4 1 -.\ .\. �\. \\ . 4? \ '\ W �, O. � S.�j:lt'10•'W i1• -oP ENT 01'40 7 9 27 50 -, , , I CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: ratasvt�►�Z�S APPLICANT: Ge_c:1 e APPLICATION NUMBER: SA - 0-15-87 The following is a list of adjacent property owners.and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER ),4L M y ; 4,40T S tr9 f o, tax 2436 2l/ ' 7 z //- 6 Re7v2, 01, 9cfos6 7/4. Svgssrgc 'PN,E /l 9 j0- a l? ' /r rm 9Fe S6 Fo/? 0,a#!2 C� l,1), L, 678 S‘ws6-7' / c.v49 NE 712 7S-0-oe'6' g6--271417 67 cEr6c.lry 72 2-/C0 686ti )d Nolo 4o a No\S1n`a v;a4 a, • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • CERTIFICATION Oi,1•<,_< <rr(3 hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at -, 4-; LI J on the .=-, day of - t • f !!C 1 / /l ' ? : i !i• g iJ> SIGNED:,` `\ ! CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I. Sj,Ar.�k.. £ hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were ailed on Nlai 111 1181 , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the St to of Washington residing at , on the day of I (q 8ct ge dip SIGNED: 1' 4- -44, --�,y oC G� FORM 208