Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWTR272222Map Output Ding County Page 1 of 2 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma l 80 9037 12 , 907$ 9129 SF +Fy+ 3fi18� Tly �1 .Jiro t. df396 _ yi, 5 00co 09�d'.i . • d gel 21 90,12 9?JIO 904b . .i S i 4 1490 2'4 t C 20W Km Count 1 1 ;MI Legend Selected Features EILA n.ao.l�gtct-r .axou s io w A,43-R<%i,4aCUpa�=a 7 County Boundary A,35>A(rfvd..rd,awDtl;Kr 3S=ez € Ni3-.`tagVcc**dy�r,�x Streets forte, D Ca • Canrrrui}r•.sr I J Forest Production District ❑ » . M--,as ❑ R9 • Rc4oW Srnw Boundar y RX2S • Rtrd A=ca. aac rSAJ p�- S axcc O.O!:cc // Agricultural Production District` 52 r s Atu, urw Lu rz� 5 I011 1 boy, r Boundary ,. biA•SO.Rw,&4*ca,uxv"Upir1iax� ❑ Ohm _.. L:R . isn Rccr Y , anc CU , 5 cxarct tv Urban GroMh Area Line ❑ R. 1, Rer..ekt^ra`,a-K;JU a"mr yca Lakes and Large Rivers R,c . Rc«duxd", c 0u Wckleshool Tribe 3i.g.. Rc.:�•r�h8031 �:rcre ❑Parcel �� >7.Ei , itc..ck.r:aL 8 J+J P=�` use Incorporated Area r, .d R.12- Rc«-vc-t at, 12OU =c Zoning Labels R.:a. Re udwrs-&, roOU =44=e Zoning R-2: • Reskc -it,, 2t OU = ;*=a The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. http://www5.metrokc. gov/servlet/com.esri. esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=overview&Cli,... 03/22/2004 King County: Assessor Property Characteristics Report King County Page I of 2 By law this information may not be used for commercial purposes. Assessor Condominium Complex Records: Tip: List all units in this Condominium Complex NEW Address 2900 ROYAL HILLS DR SE Complex Description 46 Unit Condo Complex Type Condo, Residential Number of Buildings 13 Project Location AVERAGE Number of Stories 2 Project Appeal AVERAGE Number of Units 46 Percent with View 0 Average Unit Size 0 Percent Complete 100 Land Type Fee Simple Land Per Unit 0 Construction Class WOOD FRAME Elevators N Building Quality AVERAGE Security System N Condition Average Fireplace Year Built 2003 Laundry PRIVATE Effective Year 2003 Apartment Conversion N Assessor Parcel Records: District Name RENTON Property Name SHADOW HAWK I Property ro� e Type CONDOMINIUM Plat Name SHADOW HAWK I Present Condominium Use (Residential) Plat Block Water WATER System DISTRICT Plat Lot Sewer System PUBLIC Lot Area 2,288,417 SgFt (52.53 Access PUBLIC acres) Section/Township/Range NE 21 23 5 Street Surface PAVED This report was generated: 3/22/2004 2:24:38 PM Related on-line DDES: Permit Applications Report Kina County: Districts and Develooi http://www5.metrokc.gov/reports/property_report.asp?PIN=7701570000 03/22/2004 King County: Assessor Property Characteristics Report Page 2 of 2 King County Assessor: eReal Property Report (PDF format requires Acrobat) .... .. .... _..... . King County Treasury Operations: Property Tax Information Recorders Office: V Excise Tax Affidavits Report Recorders Office: Scanned images of plats s' urveys, and other map documents Enter a 10 digit Parcel Number: or Enter an address: Kin -County I GIS Center I News I Services I Comments I Search By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. http://www5.metroke.gov/reports/property_report.asp?PIN=7701570000 03/22/2004 City of Seattle Norman B. Rice, Mayor Seattle Public Utilities Diana Gale, Director April29, 1997 Abdoul Gafour City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 rf t fvl AY - 2 t997 C1T`; `? NTC Re: Utility Crossing Permit for Cedar River Utility Pipelines Permit #U96-004, B.M. pg. 371 l�lt[.1T1A King County has signed property rights documents satisfactory to Seattle Public Utilities (formerly Seattle Water Department), and I am sending along copies for your files. Also enclosed is an original of Renton's fully -executed Utility Crossing Consent. This completes property rights for you to proceed with construction. Please have your contractor contact Joe Mickelson at 255-2242, and Wes Edens at 684-5933 to give notice before you begin the work. Sincerely, 4 Donna M. Kr get Sr. Real Property Agent Real Estate Services cc: Sandy Gray Charlie Madden Dexter Horton Building, 1 Oth floor 710 Second Avenue, Seattle WA 98104 Tel: (206) 684-5851, TTY/TDD (206) 233-7241, FAX: (206) 684-4631 An equal -employment opportunity, affirmative action employer. Accommodations for people with disabilities provided on request. Os IPN0 i Norman B. Rice, Mayor Seattle Public Utilities Diana Gale, Director April 29, 1997 Rodrick Boyd King County Office of Open Space Water and Land Resource Division Smith Tower, Room 708 506 2nd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Utility Consent #U96-009 and Utility Use Permit 4U97-007 ESSL at Cedar River, B.M. pg. 371 Dear Rod: Here is your fully signed Utility Consent Agreement #U96-009 and your Utility Use Permit #U97-007. Sharon Gordon also initialed the plan sheet Exhibit "B", acknowledging that SPU understands King County will retain the existing sewer pipeline as an overflow system.. Sincerely, Donna M. Kruger Sr. Real Property Agent Real Estate Services cc: VAXbdoul GafouC Sandy Gray Charlie Madden Dexter Horton Building, 1 Oth floor 710 Second Avenue, Seattle WA 98104 Tel: (206) 684-5851, TTY/TDD (206) 233-7241, FAX: (206) 684-4631 An equal -employment opportunity, affirmative action employer. Accommodations for people with disabilities provided on request. ms CITY OF SEATTLE,- WATER DEPARTMENT B.M. 371-414, NE 05-21-23 CONSENT IS HEREBY GIVEN to the CITY OF RENTON (hereinafter called "Renton") to cross Seattle Water Department's (hereinafter called SWD) 36-inch East Side Supply Line (ESSL) with a 16-inch Class 52 ductile iron pipe water line, and, acting as King County's agent, to construct one 12-inch and one 16-inch Class 52 ductile iron pipe sanitary sewer line. Said water line will cross perpendicular to SWD's 36-inch ESSL approximately 27 feet southwesterly of the southwesterly margin of Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) and said sewer lines will cross perpendicular to SWD's 36-inch ESSL approximately 20 feet southwesterly of the southwest margin of Maple Valley Highway (SR 169), all as shown on Cedar River Utility Crossing Plans, May 1996, WTR27=2222. Also, permission is granted to Renton for construction access to the bank of Cedar River over existing roadways on SWD's fee -owned property as shown on Renton/KCWPCD Cedar River Utility Crossing, May 1996, plan sheet 4 marked "Exhibit A" attached, and for access to operate and maintain the river diversion channel shown on sheet 8 of said plans until July 31, 2000. Renton is further granted access along said existing roadways to operate and maintain the 16-inch water line. Upon completion of construction, King County shall operate and maintain said sanitary lines under the terms of Utility Crossing Consent #U96-009. 1. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Renton agrees that SWD shall not be responsible for any injury, loss or damage of any kind or description which may accrue to or be sustained by any person, firm, corporation or other entity by reason of Renton's sole negligence or to the extent of the Renton's concurrent negligence in the construction of said water and sewer lines, or maintenance, operation, or use of said water line, or the use and occupancy of the property referenced above by Renton, its successors or assigns. In the event any suit or action be brought against SWD by reason thereof, Renton, its successors or assigns shall indemnify and save the City' of Seattle harmless therefrom, and shall upon notice to it of the commencement thereof, defend . such suit or action at its sole cost and expense and will fully satisfy the final judgment rendered in any such suit or action except for that portion, if any, of such injury, loss or damage that results in such judgment, which is attributable to and proximately results from negligence of the City of Seattle, its agents, employees or officers. 2. SWD shall be notified (255-2242) two days before work is begun. 3. Renton's crossing of SWD's ESSL shall in no way interfere with the present or future use, operation, maintenance, or reconstruction of said ESSL for any purpose. A minimum vertical clearance of twelve inches shall be maintained between said water line and the City's existing 36- inch ESSL, and said sewer lines shall be constructed with a minimum vertical clearance of eighteen inches from the City's existing 36-inch ESSL. Work to be prosecuted with diligence, and with due respect to all property, contracts, persons, rights and the interests and convenience of the public. Renton agrees to restore the premises to the condition found, or better. 4. Renton agrees to pay to SWD the reasonable cost of repair of any of SWD's facilities damaged by the installation of said water and sewer lines, or the operation or maintenance of Renton's water line. 5. Renton agrees that the City of Seattle shall not be liable for.any damage to said water line by reason of any construction, alteration or improvement by SWD, its agents or representatives, except where such damage is caused by the sole or comparative negligence of the City of Seattle, its agents or employees. 6. Renton shall notify SWD prior to installing cathodic protection to facilities approved by this Consent Agreement. Renton will provide, at its own expense, appropriate corrosion control measures to protect SWD's facilities from stray electrical current caused by Renton's facilities. SWD will notify Renton of any future cathodic protection facilities installed by SWD, and Renton shall be responsible for installing and maintaining stray current mitigation measures to its facilities. Renton shall join with SWD in cooperative testing for stray current interference. SWD shall not be responsible for any corrosive damage to Renton's facilities caused by the. SWD's existing or future cathodic protection installations, except where such damage is caused by the sole or comparative negligence of the City of Seattle, its agents or employees. 7. This Agreement is revocable upon 180 days notice by the Superintendent of Water. It is understood that this Agreement would be revoked only if SWD's fee -owned property lying south of Cedar River were required for SWD's use. 8. This Agreement is not transferable. 9. One copy of this Agreement must be on -site during installation by Renton or Renton's agent. All work shall be completed by July 31, 1997, and as -built plans shall be provided to SWD by December 31, 1997. 10. This Agreement is invalid unless executed in acceptance by Renton and approved by SWD. ...... ....... ....... .. .. . . 11. Payment of application fee: $500,00 to cover costs of administration, inspection, etc. If costs to the City of Seattle in conjunction with this Utility Crossing Consent exceed the application fee, Renton agrees, upon being billed, to pay such reasonable costs. 12. Renton shall submit any reconstruction plans to SWD for review. SUBJECT ALSO TO THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1 . Heavy equipment and materials shall not be stored on the ESSL. 2. Excavation for the river diversion shall not expose the ESSL or its casing. Three feet of cover shall be maintained over the ESSL where the diversion passes over this pipeline. Contractor must provide a submittal for SWD review and comment on this work. 3. As noted in the contract plans, all vehicles will be restricted to a 10,000 lb. per axle load limit within 10 feet of the ESSL centerline and an armored crossing will be required for construction equipment traffic crossing the ESSL. The contractor must provide SWD with a submittal for review and comment for crossing protection, equipment to be used, and how the equipment will be used within the ESSL right of way. 4. Paving shall extend to the toe of the hill. Provide SWD with a submittal for review and comment on roadway surfacing plan and allow two weeks for review and comment. 5. Any excavations in the ESSL will require shoring and support plans. In cases where the depth and size of the trench excavation is within 5 feet of the ESSL or greater than 5 feet in depth, a plan will be required for SWD review. Parallel trenches or perpendicular crossings under the ESSL will also require settlement monitoring and vibration monitoring, depending upon the construction activities and proximity to the ESSL. SWD reserves the right for further restrictions if construction activities threaten to cause settlement of the ESSL. 6. The gate shown on plan sheet C17 of plans, as referenced in paragraph 1 of this Consent, shall be made to accommodate a chain and 6 padlocks. Arrangements to hang a padlock must made with SWD Operations, 255-2242. The gate shall be kept securely padlocked when not in actual use. A guard rail shall be constructed instead of bollards, as shown on said page C 17 of contract plans, as referenced in paragraph 1 of this Consent. 7. There shall be no anchors for the inflatable dams within 10 feet of the edge of the pipeline or casing to the ESSL. The installation of the inflatable dam and any anchors shall require a submittal for SWD's review. The submittal shall require the seal of a registered professional engineer in Washington. 8. No equipment for construction, excavation, restoration, etc. shall be placed within 10 feet of the ESSL in performing these tasks so as not to load or disturb the pipeline. 9. SWD will determine the depth of cover over the ESSL at the top of the hill. If other locations are needed, please notify SWD. 10. SWD will have its construction inspector on site to monitor activities for the diversion and pipe crossings. Also, SWD's inspector will make periodic site visits when construction activities are not affecting the ESSL for compliance with right-of-way permit requirements. 11 . Prior to construction requiring use of the right-of-way, notify SWD 2 weeks in advance. Contact Joe Mickelson at 255-2242 and Wes Edens at 684-5933. 12. On all submittal reviews, allow at least two weeks for SWD to review. APPROVED BY THE SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT By ltt)l s Sharon King, Manager of Real Utate Services Date be (, - o I C4CI ACCEPTS, Y CITY OF RENTON 11 By ,�11,(r�4� � •,.v Title Ur�CIT��S 17112(=(TM1 Date 17C-( 5 . 15% dk11-1-96 ASPHALT PA,�VEN' DIRT ROAD RIVER EXISTING TREE. 0 00 NOT DISI1jR8 EXISTING LANDSCAPED AREA 67 ........................................ . LEGEND ss — SANITARY SEWER SWID tSSL RIGHT OF WAY ST — STORM SEWER PRCPERTY UNE tL TELEPHONE RIGHT OF WAY UNIT `. . TELEVISION RIGHT OF WAY CENTER TIT WATER MAIN STATION BASELINE ABANDONED PROPOSED I' CONTOUR WATER MkN P POWER PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR SEWER MANHOLE PP.^,CSED AAlER MAiN UCHT POLE PROPOSED SEWER MAIN CATCH BASIN — — — — ------as — — VALLEY HWY (SR :169)fit 2: ..... . .... . ...... . . .... ............. .......... ........................... . . = . . ....................... ....... .................a..........._.. . . .... . ... . .............. jTj Irt ............. TEL ---- — -------- ...... TR. lei .. . ................. ------- ... ......... .......... ..... ........ ...... ... ......... .......... ....... .. .... (10 c only My LISIHX3 e.j T, U5 U) 0 ui -7 LLJ 3: rd o JAI' z Lu U) L.Li CC 0 cc 0 C3 v 14 — --- — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — - — — — — ......... ...... ................ ...... .............. ---- - - --- --- ........ .......................... I ....... ■ .............. ... . . . . . . . . . ........ IL . . . ........... ....... 4i' SS 42" .......... .......... 66 .... ....... ....... .. ... ....... ... 60 ... .... ... 60 ... ... ... -55 Ii 48. p at! i PIT CEDAR RIVER oomml . 2u II CITY OF SEATTLE - SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES (SPU) UTILITY USE PERMIT # 97-007 B.M. 371-415, NE 05-21-23 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GIVEN to the KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION (hereinafter called "King county" ) to connect one 12" Class 52 ductile iron pipe wastewater pipeline, and one 16" Class 52 ductile iron wastewater pipeline into an existing manhole at Station 10+25 (being approximately 770 feet south of the south bank of the Cedar River) as shown on City of Renton - KCWPCD Cascade Siphon Replacement plans by RH2 dated 12/2/96, attached hereto as "Exhibit "B". The City of Renton is acting as King County's agent in performing the installation of said wastewater lines under Renton's Utility Crossing Consent #U96-004. King County shall also have the right of ingress and egress for -maintenance of said wastewater lines over SPU's existing private road within SPU's fee -owned 66-foot wide ESSL right of way as shown on Renton/KCWPCD Cedar River Utility Crossing, May 1996, plan sheet 4 marked "Exhibit A", attached. King County shall also have the right of ingress and egress for maintenance over said private road for access to operate and maintain the river diversion channel, shown on sheet 8 of said plans, until July 31, 2000. This date may be extended by prior written approval from the Director of Seattle Public Utilities. SUBJECT to City of Seattle ordinances and regulations and to the following terms and stipulations: 1 . Permittee hereby agrees to save harmless and defend the City from all claims and liability due to the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the Permittee, its agents, invitees, and employees in its use of the premises authorized in this Permit. Each party shall be responsible proportionately for the particular party's negligent acts, errors, or omissions and claims and liability. arising therefrom, all of which is governed by R.C.W. 4.24.115. Each party shall bear its own defense costs, including attorney's fees, statutory and other costs for defending a claim. The indemnification provided for in this section with respect to any acts or omissions during the term of this Permit shall survive any termination or expiration of this Permit. 2. SPU and King county shall cooperate in monitoring the construction of said waalewa_ter lines by the City of Renton. 3. King County's maintenance, operation, or use of said wgStewat r lines within the ESSL right of way shall in no way interfere with the present or future use, operation, maintenance, or reconstruction of said ESSL for any purpose. 4. King County agrees to pay to SPU the reasonable cost of repair of any of SWD's facilities damaged by the operation or maintenance of King County's wastewater lines. 5. King County agrees that the City of Seattle shall not be liable for any damage to said wastewater lines by reason of any construction, alteration or improvement by SPU, its agents or representatives, except where such damage is caused by the sole or comparative negligence of the City of Seattle, its agents or employees. 6. King County shall notify the City prior to installing cathodic protection to facilities approved by this Permit. King County will provide, at its own expense, appropriate corrosion control measures to protect the City's facilities from stray electrical current caused by.King County's facilities. The City will notify King County of any future cathodic protection facilities installed by the City, and King County shall be responsible for installing and maintaining stray current mitigation measures to its facilities. King County shall join with the City in cooperative testing for stray current interference. The City. shall not be responsible for any corrosive damage to King County's facilities caused by the City's existing or future cathodic protection installations, except where such damage is caused by the sole or comparative negligence of the City, its agents or employees. 7. This Permit is revocable upon 180 days notice by the Director of Seattle Public Utilities. It is understood that this Permit would be revoked only if SPU's fee -owned property lying south of Cedar River were required for SPU's use. 8. This permit is not transferable. 9. One copy of this permit must be on -site during installation by King County or King County's agent. All work shall be completed by July 31, 1997. 10. This permit is invalid unless executed in acceptance by King County and approved by SPU. 11 . Payment of application fee: 5500.00 to cover costs of administration, inspection, etc. If costs to the City of Seattle in conjunction with this permit exceed the permit fee, Permittee agrees, upon being billed, to pay such reasonable costs. 12. The gate, shown on plan sheet C17 of plans referenced in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, shall be kept securely padlocked when not in actual use. Arrangements to hang a padlock must be made with SPU Operations by calling 255-2242. 13. King County shall submit any reconstruction plans to SPU for review. APPROVED BY THE SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES By jAa�L� 6 41� Sharon King, Manager o eal Estate Services Date ACCEPTED BY KING COUNTY By r Title /��w.� n�� c7�'�u_�_ r•c„ti�j n� �A-- Date '-1 � 1.1 S '1 DK4-10-97 t� ASPHALT PA'.EUEN' l DIRT ROAD RIVER 0 00 No G TREE. 00 NOF DISTURB —• EbSRNG %EtICE ;.K%i LANDSCAPED :.RE+ I 6?.. —' t!— T.A.LIaE Y H WY (SR -:.16 9:)I" - TEL .wYi•- �Itl -• 1 LEGEND — ss — SANITARY SEVU — — --- Sx0 ,SSE RIGHT OF WAY •-- ST — STCRM SMR '— - — PROPERTY UNE '1 --- TELEPHONE - — RIGHT OF WAY Ut4IT '---' '•-- TELEVISION -- RIGHT OF WAY CENTER IT — WATER MAIN - — STATION BA5ZUNE ARMOONED WATER MAIN PROPOSED I' CONTCUR — p — POWER •• _ _ - - -- -' PROPOSED 5' C1NT6UR ® SEYrER MANHOLE PRC•"CSED 0-o LICHI POLE PROPOSED SEnfR MAIN 0 CATCH BASIN ' ERTRAL 70 65 - 55 II IYI rl Ij. It IL. I I I. I'I'llll. 'lllll�Ilt�IL t/1 i III IIi I I. l IITIIYII IYY� I h1i 1,I,11i1: �II III I i ' II. I� I I !:Ii MI, Ili II I II 00 z I; yf I 1PP _ u m :cl• (ilL�l k � y fit... U) ' d��l� ►— w C� llihw :;I � ' - Q O pII �• ,.I ocr . 1.i', LU 'yr U t'__._...... _ "r.. Cl.............:......h ....... ...21 ..... Ll i'�rt• s � S'r,;,,'-�',,`; 17�..9 �'.. ........._A= .�. CITY OF SEATTLE - SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES (SPU) B.M. 371-415, NE 05-21-23 PERMISSION IS HEREBY GIVEN to the KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION (hereinafter called "King county" ) to cross SPUs', 36-inch East Side Supply Line (ESSL) with one 12-inch Class 52 ductile iron pipe wastewater pipeline, and one 16-inch Class 52 ductile iron pipe wastewater pipeline, along with all connections and appurtenances thereto. Said sewer lines cross over the ESSL approximately 20 feet southwesterly of the southwesterly margin of Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) as shown on Cedar River Utility Crossing, May 1996, WTR27-2222. The City of Renton acted as King County's agent in performing the installation of said sewer lines under Renton's Utility Crossing Consent #U96-004. SUBJECT TO the following stipulations: 1 . SPU shall be notified (255-2242) at least 48 hours prior to installation, maintenance, or reconstruction of said wastewater pipelines. . 2. Consentee's use of the right of way shall in no way interfere with the operation, maintenance, or reconstruction of the City's existing pipeline facility. A minimum vertical clearance of twelve inches shall be maintained between said wastewater pipelines and City's existing pipeline facility. 3. The trench excavation for said wastewater pipelines should be restrained to a maximum width of three feet in the immediate vicinity of the City's existing pipeline to protect the existing pipe bedding. Backfill for the trench in this vicinity should be of a suitable material that is firmly compacted to approximately 95 percent compaction. 4. Consentee agrees to pay to the.City the cost of repair of any of the City's facilities damaged by the installation, operation or maintenance of said wastewater pipelines. Consentee agrees to restore the premises to the condition found, or better. 5. Consentee hereby agrees to save harmless and defend the City from all claims and liability due to the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the Permittee, its agents, invitees, and employees in its use of the premises authorized in this Consent Agreement. Each party shall be responsible proportionately for the particular party's negligent acts, errors, or omissions and claims and liability arising therefrom, all of which is governed by R.C.W. 4.24.115. Each party shall bear its own . defense costs, including attorney's fees, statutory and other costs for defending a claim. The indemnification provided for in this section with respect to any acts or omissions during the term of this Agreement shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 6. The Consentee shall notify the City prior to installing cathodic protection to facilities approved by this Consent. Consentee will provide,. at its own expense, appropriate corrosion control measures to protect the City's facilities from stray electrical current caused by Consentee's facilities. The City will notify the Consentee of any future cathodic protection facilities installed by the City, and Consentee shall be responsible for installing and maintaining stray current mitigation measures to its facilities. The Consentee shall join with the City in cooperative testing for stray current interference. The City shall not be responsible for any corrosive damage to Consentee's facilities caused by the City's existing or future cathodic protection installations, except where such damage is caused by the sole or comparative negligence of ,the City, its agents or employees. PROVIDED, that the City does not waive or subordinate any of the rights and privileges granted to the City. This consent is subject to existing rights, if any, of other parties. APPROVED BY SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES By -4Aa haron King, Ma'na-gerl Rea state Services ACCEPTED BY KING COUNTY Date a� �� 7 By G Date L Title �-� � i, j I `j T— PE RE -a-, m- INSTALL 24' ACCESS COlI% UDDER. AhD CHANNEL BOTTOM FOR rLOW 14T0 12- MAR( RIM - IE 8288, - 16' ti Ic ;2-U' - 12' OUT 11 = 84.49' - 16. OUT MANf� APPURTENAXCES To MEET ALL APPLICABLE KCM\ CD AND OSHA STANDARDS FOR Mmq�2fS�HCSEE DETAt. FY TI wAN CORE ORLL NEW 16* OUTLET.i An RECHANNELBOTTOM pER: ;l .17"681:75;-L--.l30g55T! K >CD ST ARM: CwlcD . STAND- : :: PLAN I 1: --2 7 ,SITE PLAN LOCATION SEWER PIPE LEGEND SEWER RUING LEGEND STANDARD —HOLE srEps AND/oR LADDER 2T 210 - ------------------ -- 200 24* ACCESS OPENING190 EXHIBIT "B" 16* Lli 22 j. * BEND (ubuj) 16. 01 PIPE STANDARDS 130 JE:l aim, - — --------- 120: 84.49' - 16* CUT.. .... ss --56-Z—ONE 16TRANSUIE�&-Lb—u� r TA" 10 R AND SEINE NATER &AINS AT CROSSNG: SEE gTAL ON DWC N(j:MO4 100 --------------- S 4976 01 90. .804 . 1) CONTRACTOR SHALL TEWT, Oki; T SHALL Z�� : - - . .- ` -- - . .. .. ENGINEERS IF :. S AN T 'AND PLANNERS - 80 D(MENSI?N OF RESTube joNT PIKS nmics To LE UEEl MUG TOPM/J)Tff AND scomsm- PROFILE 70 Z FIA C 2) CONTW70R SHALL M7A�j 5m 6 21- 11 0) CESSAR f - 4, 72�OLW�52 0628 6 2 ADAPTOM - - i To TRMSIPON FROM RJ Boo 7-12 1 sxm Tron PFES TO T po 4E I. Ics I I-- ---. - - .. :.- 60 DPAiMd To z 1000' IF BARK N07 r LONG CONTRAC70R SHALL POLnW 3) ALL 67V &pCTXE� 2' -AL n" WE AM FITTINGS. SEE SPEOF)CATION 950 900 50. NT( N,- Di 850 750 -,.;CITY 800 )IF RE -,Kcwpc 7001 650' LIMA 1:54). CASCADE Sw" PROFILE 1. )ESIPHO p ASCA[ 2W -FiE EIVIENT,;',�- N .11 P an 4. HED bfil sc RP'2 ENGINEERING TEL No.206-869-7769 Aug 8,96 15.59 No.006 P.02 3c ,"Sup 9' sut> -P:(c 4Rss-5 A.r-. SWD CROSSING PLAN To perforni the work in the contract, we will have to cross the SWD owned 36" water lime at the two locations shown above. RCI's twain access to the project is from the North side of the river. Access from the South side will be litnited to: a 235 Caterpillar excavator, a 320L Caterpillar excavator, a 950H Caterpillar loader, and pickups. Ingress and egress to the South side with the equipment will be limited to a one time event. Please find attached equipment specifications for (lie above referenced equipment. Calculatimis stlow that none of the proposed equipment exceeds the 9,000 pounds per square foot requirement specified in the notes on plan sheet number 3. None of our pickups exceed the 10.000 per axle loads. Since none of Lire items come close to the specified weights and access is limited, we will not anuor the crossing locations. TEMPORARY ROAD llVOIROVEMENTS Due to the limited access required by RCI at the South side and the nature of our equipment, we will not temporarily pave the access road within the LSSI, right of way. Improvements will be limited to the installation of the specified swing gate. RH2 ENGINEERING TEL No.206-869-7769 Aug 8,96 15:59 No.006 P.03 Wheel Loaders Performance Data • 950F Series 11 Bucket Type and Ground Engaging Tools (cont'd) -- capacity. rated (§) m' ---- rn. Capacity, struck l§) yd' --� min WidtY� (§h In Du p Clearance al ruff lih --min �n and 45• discharge Reach at full lift nd ttrin 45• discharge... _ • d' harge and --�- m General Purp Bolt -on Teeth Edges :F7 2.7 3.50 3.50 2,40 2.34 3.14 3.06 28t1 2777 8 1' 109" 2830 2906 9'3" 9 8" Y198 1118 3'11' 3'8" t660 1636 S 6' 5.4„ Rock . with Teeth Bolton Teeth is 4k Segme�ls eg�ents -Cdges 2.7 2.7 27 2.7 3.S0 3.50 2.32 2 3 t 2.28 3.03 3.02 2.9e 2815 IS y8 t 5 2811 • 111" 111 2820 -2661 21 91 V g,3" - 1222 1351 1t96 d 0' 3'S" 3'11 1699 1080 5,8., 58., 5.6.. �- - 2493 `- 2694 r High 11fi i All Sl 14 P,,�' Bucket& AvailableStexJ San1e k Capacity apaG �rJ� Same Width seine Sa� DApclearanco Same and 45- d+sch� s�56 wCh�J 45' discharge +2- S pe&Ch et 45' die 2130 min Q'0' .482 ptwiln lift al and bucket let, a425 �jng Depth Reach at 45 +� 2130 min (TO") clearance (§)_ 11,01 2500 2358 2500 8'3• 8.2. 8'10" .1017 Reach with lilt arm horiionlal trim IVIn 8'3' 7•g - 61 - 36 +25 66 �10, 1'4„ Drerall length - and bucket level..' min 36 66 2.6 2.4•, -7872 2.6" - 7936 +525 7s*3 OAfull height wi Digq+nq Depth (§) In 7567 25'3" 260 +20.1' altullraise --�-^ length (§) mT 76II3 tin 25 2' 24'10� 25'2" 5247 5388 •5� 5388 .22.0 la&der clearanc Qvcrall n1m 5247 t7 3' 5247 1T'3' 17 3 17'6" 17 6 +271 •, - t 3 905 t3 89d bucket in carry Ioa Qvetell height Wlth bucket 1VIn 13 71 4 t3 8e7 45'7" •9.3',• 4&6c tipping at lull raise (§) with �J m 73 847 45'S'- d5,3„ 45•5 -- 45'7" Yraighl' Loader clearance circle "An - 741 4504, qhk lipping oa{ bucket In carry position (§) �_ 11647 t t 6t3 t 1 630 -1974, 25,644 25,889 Static tipping load" k 11880 9 25,682 25,607 t0 672 -03S., baakout force"' Straight Ib 25,195 10 S92 10 569 f 0 563 23.532 -2081 it 10 813 23,893 23,355 23.269 23.291 -Ya3 t43 �b- Oparatingweigh Full 35' rum �' Ib - 159 157 Y, 3 32,208 32.208 '1� �� Breakout Force (§) kN ,b 36,807 35,388 38,675 16 49e - 16 514 164 +210 36.761 Ukloping load r ,9alersl°ns for l� -�� oporarng weight'• (§� k9 16 359 ,b 36.138 36,166 36,369 - hom 36.413 - standard Gn to high lilt. q0d or aOCUac O1aplair uses act red 102 mm - pecltir�tion6 can be used on high lilt arrangement. High td1 column &rro•r6 1 l h lJ huh apecilitations. fO cue 9 23�5�gnsi r 'dirt, Wtt t nt, tubelcants and oporator. rVelank, cooe dime ,dons 10r b�ctuns .All buckets cTo••�^ On6 or from Speetrrcatlons given for epOmpA1ra o''rv`01 ,.eight sho.n include :oumd•supD�easvd Cab and POPS. a J7d renect eduer dlmens+one SAE J732c e11ro-ab eQwppaG "'sloped "Static ttpDlnq bad and o,,erating pump clearance, rcacn and ovmen fang'^ d menaen: tuning edge. for buckets Caterplltar Inc. uses acluat equrpptandey mended b W finals on:. o1 AutOmoti.e Engtneers� 541= $tan0ards J732c and tab only, 2$ 18 PR (L-: the to reflect the dimeneier using I,c,ya :larderds rs�^ and ratings conform to ell loop Change lin Chan a In Art] 5 GP-28 (I Note Spodticet'om9 (autos and ere donoted In the rest by t4)- start Tlppin operating welghl - b 5 XHA (L•: PR (L- k1 .20 kQ lb 34 GP.28 (I 18 7 - 390 + + Y07 S. XHA (L ROP$ remains . ........ .. ..... . .. .. , . , 171 • 377 + . 325 + 717 . ?•07 260 ' XGLA(L 1 Remove cab only. 23.S-R25,(L•3)II Pri3)st ....., .. . . ........ ..... .. .. ..... , 409 . 90g 380 4r. 23,5•R25. GP-2© (L•2/3) sleet radial ............................. ....... - 596 -1266 r " O ti 23.5 R25 XHA. lL'3) sleet radial ........ . ................. . .. . .. . ........... _ 574 .1286 274 - 950 - 274 20.5.25.12 PR(L.2) ..., ....., ..... .... .. ...... ........ .. .. _ 631 406 - $95 - 258 20.5.25.Y6 PR (L-2) ....... .... .. .. ... .... .. . .. _ - 803 - 231 .10 20.5.25, 16 PR (L•3) • . GP 28 ( steel radial ........ .. • . • . ... .... ... . ...... 3B4 _ 341 - $36 -1182 + .1070 �( 20,5•R25. I) steel 20.5 R? ' XHA (L•3) Sleet tad; .. , .. GLA (L•2) steel rad•e - , , .. . B t 9 .2582 .1533 ♦ , , I t 7 t .2582 2o.5•R25 X I sires .. ... The ballast- 20.5.25 bras y . .. , - Tire ballast 23.5.25 bias ply fires . , . • . • ' ' , / -rt.•ei q I �5P a•on 3G, I`G��S�� y5z,,.-7fpsv iz �z W, SZo 7S'�s� L srcaa �Sl� RK2 ENGINEERING'— _ TEL No.206-869-7769 Aug 8,96 15:59 No.006 P.04 ^(7 Shoo SE 400n Excavators Ground Pressure Slim Width rpreseure ShoeType mm In OR pal Triple, 600 24 44.04 5.39 Triple 700 28 38.44 S.57 I;1 Triple 800 32 34.05 4.04 Apax 800 32 34.39 4.99 Triple 600 24 41.04 S.BS Triple 700 28 35.85 STriple 800 32 31.77 4.61 { SI Apex 800 32 32.12 6 Triple 500 20 54.50 7.90 Triple 600 24 50.01 7.25 Triple 700 28 43.15 6.26 Triple _ 800 32 3E.25 5.55 I� • ! Triple 600 24 46.10 6.69 I • .' t• Triple 700 28 40.21 5.83 Triple 800 32 35.30 5.12 cTriple 600 24 49.03 7.11 Triple 600 24 49.38 7.16 Triple 700 28 42.3 6.13 Il Triple 800 32 37,02 5,37 t Triple 600 24 54.92 7.90 I ' Triple 700 28 48.05 6.97 1 .� Triple 800 32 42.17 6.11 Triple 600 24 51.90 7.54 +� Triple 700 28 45.11 6.54 4' Triple 800 32 40.21 5.00 Apex 900 35 35.30 _ 5.12 _ Trlple, 600 24 51.98 7.64 Triple 600 24 $6.69 9.67 Triple 750 30 63.94 7.82 Triple 850 33 49.03 7.11 j pam"10re haw different provnd preesvres. See Technical Dais Sneots. r+� i-1.6( psi + 1q` = 663-,jq 'P5 r 4 3. $ �{P, l� �f 000 P,-r- Old. 4-105 RH2 ENGINEERING TEL No.206-869-7769 Aug 8,96 15:59 No.006 P.05 ECIFICATIONS- Neights (approximate) , itandard 235D LC Excavators and 235D I-,xcavators C; rtie "f" ihipping weight with adjustable carbody: Stick mm/8'0" 48 441 kg/106,827 lb 48 324 kg/106,536 lb 46 398 kg/102,290 lb 45 600 kg/100,530 lb ..........................2440 mrr/9'6" 48 555 kg/107,0171b 48 418 kg/106,726 lb 46 404 kg/102,400 lb 46 606 kg/100,720 lb ..............I....................2900 mm/12'0" 48 814 kg/107,637 lb 48 691 kg/107,345 lb 46 765 kg/103,099 Ib 45 967 kg/101,340 lb .............I...................3660 ... ... . .......................... 457'2 mm/15'0" 49 444 kg/109,026 Ib 49 321 kg/108,734 lb 47 395 kg/104,400 lb 46 597 kg/102,729 lb Operating weight: Stick ..........................2440 mm/8'0" 48 902 kg/107,811 Ib 48 779 kg/107,539 Ib 46 853 kg/103,293 lb 46 055 kg/101,1i34 lb mm/9'6" 48 980 kg/108,001 lb 48 857 kg/107,711 lb 46 931 kg/103,465 lb 46 133 kg/101,706 lb ...................................2900 mtn/12'0" 49 269 kg/108,621 lb 49 146 kg/108,3481b 47 220 kg/104,102 lb 46 422 kg/102,3431b ,...........1...................3660 .................................4572 mm/15'0" 49 891 kg/110,010 lb 49 768 kg/109,7201b 47 842 kg/105,474 lb 47 044 kg/103,714 lb Ground pressure: M 54 bar/ 65.5 kPa/.65 bar/ 78.6 kPa/.79 bar/ 102.7 kPa/,1.03 bar/ Stick .......................3660 mm/12'0" ?.9 ps 9.5 psi 11.4 psi 14.9 psi Shipping weight with narrow, fixed carbody: Stick mm/8'0" 46 368 kg/102,224 lb 46 254 kg/101,991 lb 44 473 kg/98,046 lb 43 735 kg/96,419.Ib .........................2440 2900 mm/9'6" 46 454 kg/102,414 lb 46 340 kg/102,161 lb 44 555 kg/98,2581b 43.821 kg/96,885 lb 3660 mtn/12'0" 46 735 kg/103,0331b 46 621 kg/102,801 lb .44 840 k08,855 lb 44 102 kg/97,228 lb 4572 mm/16'0" 47 365 kg/104,422 lb 47 251 kg/104,1901b 45 470 kg/100,2441b 44 732 kg/98,617 lb Operating weight: Stick mm/8'0" 46 814 kg/103,207 lb 46 700 kg/102,975 lb 44 919 kg/99,0291b 44 181 kg/97,402 lb .........................2440 2900 mrn/9'6" 46 900 kg(103,397 lb 46 786 kg/103,165 lb 45 005 kg/99,2191b 44 267 kg/97,592 lb 3660 mm/12'0" 47 182 kg(104,0181b 47 068 kg/103,7851b 46 287 k09,841 lb 44 649 kg/98,214 lb 4572 mm/15'0" 47 811 kg/105,405 lb 47 697 kg(105,174 lb 45 916 kg/101,227 Ib 45 178 kg/99,6001b Ground pressure: 57,9 kl'a/.58 bar/ 69.3 kPa/.69 bar/ 83.4 kPa/.83 bar/ 109.6 kPa/1.09 bar/ Stick ........................3660 mm/12'0" J 8.4 psi 1 10.0 psi i 12.1 psi 16.9 psi 'Deduct 2286 kgr5,000 lb for optional 5443 kb/12,000 lb counterweight. "1.-1XIyJ r I/1y).6 T>sr- Standard Removal Weights: kg Lb Counterweight ............................. 7711 17,000 366U mnV12'0" Stick with bucket linkage ................. 2240 4,939 2900 nlm/9'6" Stick with bucket linkage ................. 1959 4,319 2440 mm/8'0" Stick with bucket linkage ................. 1872 4,129 See chart, pages 14 and 15 for individual bucket weights. CITY OF RENTON Jesse Tanner, Mayor August 8, 1996 Mr. Brian Spindor, P.E. Seattle Water Department Dexter Horton Building, IOth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Cedar River Utility Crossing —Construction access across SWD r/o/w Dear Brian: This. letter is to respond to your faxed letter dated August 8, 1996 regarding your concerns over the lack of protection for the 36" SWD within the construction zone for the. new Renton and King County's pipelines. Due to our very short construction window, our contractor Bob Pranger of Robison Construction Inc. (863-5200) has contacted and has. met with the inspector from SWD who was working in.place of Joe Mickelson prior to bringing the construction equipment across the SWD pipeline and down to the south bank of the river. RCI has also submitted the requested information for the axle load of their equipment to, our consultant engineer RH2 Engineering. A copy of the submittals is enclosed. The load of the equipment are within the limits allowed by the permit from SWD. I apologized for not having forwarded this information to you earlier for your review'and approval. Currently, some of the equipment are within the asphalt trail south of Maple Valley Highway,. away from the SWD pipeline. There are also other equipment working within the river bed, away from the SWD pipeline. I have advised RCI not to park any heavy equipment over the SWD pipeline. The rubber dams placed within the river bed are not located on top of the SWD pipeline and they are not held by anchor.into the river bed. I have asked my supervisor Lys Hornsby (277-5539) to meet with you tomorrow at the site since I will not be in tomorrow. I have also asked Dan Ervin of RH2 Engineering (453=0241) to call you on this matter. If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at 277-6210. Sincerely, "LLI-1 464t,� Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer CC: Lys Hornsby, Ron Olsen, City of Renton Bob Pranger, Robison Construction Inc. Dan Ervin, P.E., RH2 Engineering, P.S. Stan Hummel, King County Water Pollution Control H\590zone196-048AG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 o ' � /? Jesse Tanner, Mayor August 16, 1996 Mr. Brian Spindor, P.E. Seattle Water Department Dexter Horton Building, IOth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works.Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Cedar River Utility Crossing - Permit Compliance Dear Brian: This letter is address issues regarding the compliance to the special conditions of the Utility Crossing Consent Agreement. Condition no. 1: Use of heavy equipment The contractor did not store any heavy equipment or material on the ESSL. The equipment (front end loader and medium size backhoe) were using the east side of the road, about 25 feet west of the ESSL pipeline, for minimal periods of time. No equipment was parked over or within 10 feet of the ESSL pipeline. Condition No. 2: Minimum ground cover over ESSL The contractor did not expose the ESSL during the excavation of the diversion channel. The contractor potholed and found the existing Metro's sewer line and the channel was constructed easterly of and away from the sewer line. The ESSL line is located west of the sewer line, therefore it wasnot impacted during the excavation of the channel. The existing cover -of the ESSL was not disturbed during the excavation of the channel. Condition no. 3: Restriction on equipment load The contractor has submitted the equipment axle load for all the equipment used. The submittals of the loading calculations were faxed to you on 8/8/96. The load limits of the equipment (excavator: 664 lb./sq.-ft; front-end loader: 4,521 lb./sq.-ft) were less than the.allowable load limit of 10,000 lb/sq-ft. on the permit. The contractor did install steel plates over the ESSL to provide, extra protection prior to crossing over the pipeline with the two pieces of equipment. Condition no. 4: Paving of access road to toe of hill This condition was imposed due to the potential impact to the ESSL from the use of heavy equipment over the pipeline. The contractor has chosen to access the in -river work from the north side of the river, through Maple Valley Highway; and did not use the SWD access road for trucks and other equipment. We are requesting that Seattle Water delete the requirement for paving the access road. In addition, the proposed paving will trigger the requirements of a biofiltration and detention system to handle the runoff from the new pavement, as required by the King County Surface Water Management codes. Condition no. 5: Excavation near ESSL line The excavation for the new pipelines in the river were at least 50 feet away from the ESSL line. The crossing of the new utility lines over the ESSL within the Cedar River trail has not been done yet. The H\590zone\96-052AG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 new utility lines will be at least 5 feet over the ESSL lines. There is no proposed crossing under the ESSL line. Condition no. 6: Installation of new gates The new gate will be installed by the City per the approved plans. We will also coordinate with Sandy Gray of SWD regarding the replacement of a missing gate on Royal Hills Drive. This gate will be provided by Seattle Water and will be installed by our contractor. Condition no. 7: Placement of anchors for inflatable dams The inflatable dams did not have any anchors into the river bed. The dams were deployed about 20 feet away from the ESSL line and are held 'in, place by the weight of water inside the bladders. Condition no. 8: Equipment near ESSL pipeline No construction equipment was placed within 10 feet over the ESSL. Condition no. 9: Depth of cover of ESSL line at top of hill No excavation has been done at the top of the hill at the present time. We will coordinate with SWD prior to doing excavation in this area. Condition no. 10: Inspection by SWD Our contractor has contacted SWD's inspectors prior to using the access road. I have also notified SWD's staff regarding the construction activities, and I will continue to inform you on the progress of the project. Construction no. 11 ` Notification to Seattle Water. Due to our very short construction window, I was not able to provide you with the two -week advance notice. Our contractor did contact and had received approval from SWD's inspector prior to using the access road. Steel plates were used to provide additional protection when the two pieces of equipment were crossing over the ESSL line, for a very short period of time. Condition no. 12: Submittal review time. Again, I would like to apologize to you for not being able to provide you with the two -week advance notice for review of submittals due to our very limited construction window. However, all submittals have been reviewed by our consultant engineers for compliance to the contract specifications and to the conditions of the permit requirements. from Seattle Water. I will also be forwarding to you the submittals along with our review comments as soon as possible. The City of Renton and King County really appreciate Seattle Water's cooperation and willingness to promptly resolve unanticipated conflicts with us, on this challenging project. If you have any questions or need additional information on this matter, please feel free to contact me at 277-6210. Sincerely, Aw�.L./ Z�ADuL---' Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer CC: Lys Hornsby, Ron Olsen, City of Renton Bob Pranger, Robison Construction Inc. Stan Hununel, King County Water Pollution Control Dan Ervin, P.E., RH2 Engineering, P.S. H\590zone\96-052AG 1Or " ►ak.,_ �y CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator October 3, 1997 State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Ave. SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 SUBJECT: Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit for File No. LUA-97-130,SM Gentlemen: Enclosed is the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit for the above referenced project. The permit was issued by the City of Renton on Ocotober 3, 1997. We are filing this action with the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General per WAC 173-14-090. Please review this permit and attachments and call me at 277-5586 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Mark Pywel Project M ger Enclosures: Copy of Original Application Affidavit of Public Notice/Publication Site Plan SEPA Determination cc: Office of Attorney General City of Renton, Transportation Systems City of Renton, Utility Systems City of Renton, Code Compliance Inspector Applicant 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 20 % post consumer CITY OF RENTON SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO.: DATE RECEIVED: DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: DATE APPROVED: DATE DENIED: LUA-97-130,SM September 2, 1997 September 24, 1997 October 3, 1997 N/A TYPE OF ACTION(S): [ x ] Substantial Development Permit [ ] Conditional Use Permit [ ] Variance Permit Pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, the City of Renton has granted/denied a permit: This action was taken on the following application: APPLICANT: City of Seattle PROJECT: East Side Supply Line Blowoff #1 DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: This work will upgrade an existing blowoff valve on the 36 inch East Side Supply transmission pipeline. Blowoffs are valves used to drain lines for inspection and maintenance, and for emergency dewatering of segments of the transmission line. The total project will include the installation of 650 linear feet of 8" ductile iron pipe, a rock splash pad, a pumping chamber with valves, risers and access hatch, airgap, catch basin, and a 12" ductile iron pipe connection to an existing King County manhole. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 60 foot right-of-way known as the Mercer Island Right of Way within the NE quarter of Section 21, TWN 23 N, R 5 E SEC-TWNP-R: SEC 21, T23N,R5E WITHIN SHORELINES OF: Cedar River APPLICABLE MASTER PROGRAM: City of Renton The following section/page of the Master Program is applicable to the development: Section Description Page 5.04 Urban Environment page 22. 7.18.03 Major Utilities --Specifications page 39. SUBSHDEV.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Page 2 of 2 Development of this project shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. The applicant shall install and maintain temporary erosion control measures to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division. 2. All areas where groundcover is removed or damaged shall be restored within 30 days of the completion of construction to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division. 3. All construction activities will remain outside of the wetland area identified on the site plan. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Action of 1971 and pursuant to the following: 1. The issuance of a license under the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 shall not release the applicant from compliance with federal, state, and other permit requirements. 2. This permit may be rescinded pursuant to Section 14(7) of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 in the event the permittee fails to comply with any condition hereof. 3. A construction permit shall not be issued until thirty (30) days after approval by the City of Renton Development Services Division or until any review proceedings initiated within this thirty (30) day review period have been completed. 1nl�l� bate THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT DATE RECEIVED: APPROVED: 11:40L" If Conditional Use, Section of the City's Shoreline Master Program authorizing the use: If Variance, Section(s) of the City's Shoreline Master Program being varied: This Conditional Use/Variance permit is approved/denied by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: Date Signature of Authorized Department Official cc: Attorney General's Office City of Renton, Plan Review (Neil Watts) City of Renton, Surface Water Utility (Ron Straka) Applicant SUBS4DEV.DOC Seattle Water Diana Gals, Suparintandant .—an B. Rica, Mayor August 8, 1996 Abdoul Gafour Civil Engineer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Gafour: �y AUG 201996 CIT,r CT RENTON Engineering Dept. Attached is a copy of the City of Seattle - Water Department Utility Crossing Consent Permit for Renton's and King County's work in the Water Department's right of way at the Cedar River crossing. This copy is provided for your review of issues the Department has with the work in progress. The original will be transmitted under a separate cover letter by Donna Kruger of Real Estate Services. The Department is very concerned about protecting the integrity of the Cedar Eastside Pipeline from construction activities. The Department's concern is heightened at this time of year should the pipeline have to be shut down and still provide service to the castside during increased summer demands. In the permit and in our letter to you dated June 5, 1996, the Department outlined several requirements designed to reassure the Department that all efforts were being made to protect the integrity of the pipeline. At this time the requested submittals have not been received. Seattle Water Department will not allow further construction activities that could impact our pipeline until the appropriate submittals have been reviewed by Seattle Water. The Seattle Water Department would like to meet with you and the contractor to discuss the required submittals. The Department would like to meet�alater than tomorrow, August 9th to discuss these issues. Please contact me at 684-8512 to arrange a meeting. Sincerely, B " S. r Civil gineer E Attachment cc: G. Schneider C. Madden Dexter Horton Building, loth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 0 Panted m Recycled Pape, CITY OF RENTON Jesse Tanner, Mayor August 8, 1996 Mr. Brian Spindor, P.E. Seattle Water Department Dexter Horton Building, IOth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Cedar River Utility Crossing - Construction access across SWD r/o/w Dear Brian: This letter is to respond to your faxed letter dated August 8, 1996 regarding your concerns over the lack of protection for the 36" SWD within the construction zone for the new Renton and King County's pipelines. Due to our very short construction window, our contractor Bob Pranger of Robison Construction Inc. (863-5200) has contacted and has met with the inspector from SWD who was working in place of Joe Mickelson prior to bringing the construction equipment across the SWD pipeline and down to the south bank of the river. RCI has also submitted the requested information for the axle load of their equipment to our consultant engineer RH2 Engineering. A copy of the submittals is enclosed. The load of the equipment are within the limits allowed by the permit from SWD. I apologized for not having forwarded this information to you earlier for your review and approval. Currently, some of the equipment are within the asphalt trail south of Maple Valley Highway, away from the SWD pipeline. There are also other equipment working within the river bed, away from the SWD pipeline. I have advised RCI not to park any heavy equipment over the SWD pipeline. The rubber dams placed within the river bed are not located on top of the SWD pipeline and they are not held by anchor into the river bed. I have asked my supervisor Lys Hornsby (277-5539) to meet with you tomorrow at the site since I will not be in tomorrow. I have also asked Dan Ervin of RH2 Engineering (453-0241) to call you on this matter. If you have any questions on this matter, please feel free to contact me at 277-6210. Sincerely, AmxxlL-�' 4w, ttlt,� Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer CC: Lys Hornsby, Ron Olsen, City of Renton Bob Pranger, Robison Construction Inc. Dan Ervin, P.E., RH2 Engineering, P.S. Stan Hummel, King County Water Pollution Control M590zone\96-048AG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 ® This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 25 % post consumer Jesse Tanner, Mayor June 6, 1996 Seattle Water Department Dexter'Horton Building, 1 lth Floor 710 Second Avenue - Room 1122 Seattle, WA 98104 Attention: Ms. Donna Kruger, Property Management CITY OF REloTTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator SUBJECT: Request for -Permit for Cedar River Utility Crossing Dcar. Ms. Kruger: The City of Renton requests the granting of an Utility Crossing Permit and of.a Temporary Use Permit from Seattle Water Department for the installation of a new 16" inch City water line and two sanitary sewer lines (12" and 16") for King County Water' Pollution Control Division. The above utilities will cross over the SWD's 36" East Side Supply Line oil the.south side of the Maple Valley Highway as shown. on the enclosed plans. -Two sets of final plans and bid specifications are attached.: We have also received a list of preliminary conditions dated June 5, 1995 froth Mn Brian Spindor and we N ,ill.comply with the conditions: The. constructions contract ' for tli& first phase of the project :will be awarded around. June 17, :1995" with actual construction beginning in July._1996 in order to meet the construction for the "in - This first per the .Department of Fisheries •ai d UVildlife. This first construction phase will. include the installation .of the casing pipes across the .Cedar River• and flushing structure on, the north "side of the river.' We greatly appreciate the effort and cooperation extended to us by Seattle Water Department in this project.. If you have any`questions on this matter, please feel free to'contact me at 277-6210 Sincerely, Abdoul 'Gafour Water Utility Engineer CC: Brian Spindor, P.G., Seattle Water Stan Hummel, King County Water P01111i0ii Control Dan Ervin, P.E., IZI-12 Engineering, P.S. Lys Hornsby, Ron Olsen, City of Renton 11\590zone\96-025AG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 I 06/05/96 15:01 FAX 206 684 7562 IVATER 1IGMT R ENG G _4�- -y� Z001 MO'mpn-6, glee*, mayor June 5, 1996 Post -it' Fax Note 7671 Co./Dept. Phone e S'i L 3_j Phone# Abdoul Gafour Fax r+ City of Renton Utility Systems Division 206 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Permitting requirements for use of SWD Right of Way Dear Abdoul_ In response to your request from last week, I have assembled a preliminary Ilst of conditions which apply to the construction of the pipeline crossing. I emphasize these are strictly preliminary and will be subject to revision during the formal permit application process. Although these are preliminary, you should find that they will not change significantly during the review process. The City of Renton needs to begin the formal permitting process by submitting two complete sets of drawings to the Seattle Water Department. The drawings should be sent to: Seattle Water Department Attention: Donna Kruger,. Property Management 710 2nd Avenue, Room 1122 Seattle WA 98104 Your cover letter should indicate that you will need a temporary use permit and a utility crossing permit. If you have any questions regarding the permits please contact Donna at 684-5969. Please keep me informed of your progress with t permitting process. I will be working from within the department to insure your permitting process r96yes as quickly as possible. If you have any further questions please contact me at 684-8512. Sincere �� Brian SpingpPrVE. Senior. i Engineer Attachment cc: C. Madden G. Schneider B. Schwartz D- Kruger Dexter Horton Building, loth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 06/05/96 15:01 FAX 206 684 7562 WATER MGMT & ENG 0 002 COMMENTS FOR SWD RIGHT OF WAY USE PERMIT CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING The following Is a summary of key comments and conditions for use of the SWD ESSL Right of Way by the City of Renton and King County Water Pollution to construct a utility river crossing on the Cedar River. 1. Heavy equipment and materials shall not be stored on the ESSL since there is space allocated south of the ESSL ROW near the Cedar River in the plans. 2. Excavation for the river diversion shall not expose the ESSL or it's casing_ Maintain 3-feet of cover over the ESSL where the diversion passes over this pipeline. Contractor must provide a submittal for SWD reviewlcomment on this work. (What safety mechanisms will be in place to maintain the integrity of the diversion.) 3. As noted in the contract plans, all vehicles will be restricted to a 10,000 lb. per axle load limit within 10 feet of the ESSL centerilne and an armored crossing will be required for construction equipment/traffic crossing the ESSL (such as steel plating, bridging structure, etc.). The contractor must provide SWD with a submittal for review/comment. 4_ Extend paving to the toe of the hill since construction equipment will extend to the river's edge. Provide SWD with a submittal for review and comment on roadway surfacing. S. Any excavations in the ESSL ROW will require shoring and support plans. In cases where the depth and size of the trench/excavation is within 5 feet of the ESSL or greater than 5 feet in depth, a plan will be required for SWD review. Parallel trenches or perpendicular crossings under the ESSL will also require settlement monitoring and depending on the construction activities and proximity to the ESSL, vibration monitoring-SWD reserves the right for further restrictions if construction activities threaten to cause settlement to the ESSL. 6. Please relocate the gate to the top of the hi[[ shown on plan sheet C17. 7. There shall be no anchors for the inflatable dams within 10 feet of the edge of the pipeline or casing to the ESSL. The installation of the inflatable dam and any anchors shall require a submittal for SWD's review. The submittal shall require the seal of a registered professional engineer In Washington. 8. No equipment for construction, excavation, restoration, etc. shall be placed within 10-•feet of the ESSL in performing these tasks so as not to load or disturb the pipeline. 9_ SWD will determine the depth of cover over the ESSL at the top of the hill (if other locations are- needed, please notify SWO). 10. SWD will have it's construction inspector on site to monitor activities for the diversion and pipe crossings. Also, SWD's inspector will make periodic site visits when construction activities are not affecting the ESSL for compliance with ROW permit requirements. 11. Prior to construction occurring requiring use of the ROW, notify SWD 2 weeks in advance. Contact Joe Mickelson - Lake Youngs/Transmissions at 255-2242 and Wes Edens at 684- 5933. 12. On all submittal reviews, allow at least two weeks for SWD review. CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works Dept.iDiv.,Board.. Utility Systems Division/Water Utility StaffContaet...... Abdoul Gafour (x. 6210) Subject: Utilities Cooperation Agreement by and between the City of Renton and the City of Seattle for Design of Seattle Public Utilities East Side Supply Line Blowoff Connection in Conjunction with City of Renton's Rolling Hills 590 Zone Water Main Crossing Exhibits: Resolution Utilities Cooperation Agreement between the City of Renton and City of Seattle AI #: For Agenda of: Agenda Status Consent .............. Public Hearing... Correspondence.. Ordinance ............. Resolution............ Old Business........ New Business....... Study Sessions....... Information......... May 5, 1997 K11 X Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... None Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $8,000 (Total Cost of Design Contract) City Share Total Project.. $0 Seattle's Share 100% :$8,000 Summary of Action: The City of Renton is currently constructing the 590 zone water main and King County's sewer line on the south side of the Cedar River, across Maplewood Golf Course. The City of Seattle has an existing 36" water line located next to the County's sewer line, in the vicinity of the City's project site. Seattle has requested that the City perform the design for a blow -off connection from Seattle's water line to the County's sewer line, in order to flash Seattle's water line for maintenance. Currently, Seattle is flushing their line into the Cedar River, when necessary. - A Utilities Cooperation Agreement is required for the City to have the design of the blowoff done by the City's consultant. The agreement will allow the City of Seattle to reimburse the City of Renton for 100% of the consultant's design cost in the amount of $8,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the resolution to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Utilities Cooperation Agreement between the City of Renton and the City of Seattle for reimbursement of the design cost in the amount of $8,000. 1-Ihvater/590zone/S W D97-7/AG CITY OF RENTON COUNCIL AGENDA BILL Al #: Submitting Data: Planning/Building/Public Works For Agenda of: May 5, 1997 Dept./Div./Board.. Utility Systems Division/Water Utility Agenda Status Staff Contact...... Abdoul Gafour (x. 6210) Consent .............. X C O NC u R R E N C6 Public Hearing... Subject: Utilities Cooperation Agreement by and between the City of Correspondence.. Renton and the City of Seattle for Design of Seattle Public Ordinance ............. Abvau- 6 A-6 4,1L loj' Utilities East Side Supply Line Bl v f Connection in t590 Resolution............ X Old Business........ Conjunction with City of Renton's Rollin Zone Water Main j y I ^ Crossing 11, oc New Business....... Exhibits: Resolution Study Sessions ....... /ZS Utilities Cooperation Agreement between the City of Renton and Information......... City of Seattle Recommended Action: Approvals: Council Concur Legal Dept......... X Finance Dept...... Other ............... Fiscal Impact: None Expenditure Required... None Transfer/Amendment....... Amount Budgeted.......... Revenue Generated......... Total Project Budget $8,000 (Total Cost of Design City Share Total Project.. $0 Contract) Seattle's Share (100 %): $8,000 Summary of Action: The City of Renton is currently constructing the 590 zone water main and *e King County's sewer line on the south side of the Cedar River, across Maplewood Golf Course. The City of Seattle has an existing 36" water line located next to the County's sewer line, in the vicinity of the City's project site. Seattle has requested that the City W perform the design for a blow -off connection from Seattle's water line to the County's sewer line, in order to flush Seattle's water line for maintenance. Currently, Seattle is flushing their line into the Cedar River, when necessary. A Utilities Cooperation Agreement is required for the City to have the design of the blowoff done by the City's consultant. The agreement will allow the City of Seattle to reimburse the City of Renton for 100% of the consultant's design cost in the amount of $8,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Utility Systems Division of the Planning/Building/Public Works Department recommends that Council approve the resolution to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Utilities Cooperation Agreement between the City of Renton and the City of Seattle forXe reimbursement of the design cost in the amount of $8,000. H/water/590zone/S W D97-7/AG MEMORANDUM To:. Abdoul Gafour From: Lawrence J:.Warren, City Attorney Date: March 5, 1997 Subject:. Draft Utilities Cooperation Agreement I have. reviewed the above -referenced document and the same is approved as to legal form with the following comments. = ' I. In the second WHEREAS the."term "ESSL" should'be fully explained and the term put in parenthesis. a 2 . In section 1.11 on page 2, the word�is". should be inserted after the word ".which." I am enclosing a copy of a Resolution�•authorizing the Mayor to enter into this agreement. The original of this Resolution has been sent to the City Clerk. R - Lawrence J. Warren LJW:as: . Encl. cc:``..Jay Covington Marilyn J. Petersen A8:130.55. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S. 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206)255-8678 I N CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ENTER INTO A UTILITIES COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RENTON AND THE CITY OF SEATTLE FOR THE DESIGN OF SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES EAST SIDE SUPPLY LINE BLOWOFF IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITY OF RENTON'S ROLLING HILLS 590 ZONE WATER MAIN CROSSING. WHEREAS, the City of Renton plans to design and construct a new water main to cross the Cedar River to convey water from the Maplewood Wells to the S90 Zone reservoir; and WHEREAS, Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) operates and maintains a blowoff to discharge water from the East Side Supply Line (ESSL) into the area adjacent to the south bank of the Cedar River; and WHEREAS, it is not desirable to discharge water from the ESSL in the area adjacent to the Cedar River, when draining the ESSL for emergency or maintenance purposes; and WHEREAS, SPU wishes to design and construct a new blowoff which would connect to the King County's Cascade Siphon sewer pipeline; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton and SPU have determined that a joint project for SPU's blowoff connection in conjunction with the City's water line crossing of the Cedar River would minimize construction impacts and disturbances and would be cost effective for both agencies; and 1 RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of Renton is willing to manage the design and construction of SPU blowoff connection to the County's Cascade Siphon sewer pipeline subject to the reimbursement by SPU for design activities related to SPU's blowoff connection; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to document the agreements between the City of Renton and the City of Seattle; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. The above recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION II. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into a Utilities Cooperation Agreement by and between the City of Renton and the City of Seattle for. the design of Seattle Public Utilities East Side Supply Line Blowoff in conjunction with the City of Renton's Rolling Hills 590 Zone water main crossing. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this day of , 1997. Marilyn J. Petersen, City Clerk APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this day of , 1997. Jesse Tanner, Mayor Approved as to form: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RES.575:3/05/97. PJ r City of Seattle Normaii k. IZir��, Ala�ur Seattle Public Utilities Diana Gale, Director April 23, 1997 Mr. Abdoul Gafour City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Agreement for Design of Blow -off for ESSL Dear Abdoul, You will find attached two copies of the subject agreement, which incorporates the revisions you requested in our last correspondence. Please arrange for signatures by the City of Renton and return both copies to me for signatures in order to execute the agreement. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 684-5921. Thank you. Sincerely, Mike Brennan Senior Civil Engineer Seattle Public Utilities cc: Charles Madden, Marlene Yamashita - City of Seattle Enclosures Dexter Horton Building, 1 Oth floor 710 Second Avenue, Seattle WA 98104 Tel: (206) 684-5851, TTY/TDD (206) 233-7241, FAX: (206) 684-4631 An equal -employment opportunity, affirmative action employer. Accommodations for people with disabilities provided on request. h V•r ;y CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department J e Tanner, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator February 14, 1997 Mr. Charles Madden, P.E. Seattle Public Utilities Dexter Horton Building, 1 Oth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Submittals for crossing of SWD's ESSL#1 pipeline by construction equipment Dear Charlie: Attached are the submittals from our contractor DDJ Const., for the protection of the SWD 36" pipeline by equipment crossing. Please call me at 277-6210 if you have any questions or need any additional information on this matter. Thank you. Sincerely: At9ouv (aoua,� Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer CC: Brian Spindor, P.E. Lys Hornsby - Renton Water Stan Hummel - King County WPC Enclosures 1-I:\590C& D\96-008AG 200 Mi!llll Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 / D.D.J. Construction Co., Inc. 11301 186th Ave. S.E. Issaquah, WA 98027 (206) 235-0524 Fax (206) 235- 4967 February 10, 1997 Seattle Public Dexter Horton 710 2nd Ave. Utilities Bldg., 9th floor Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Cedar River Utility Crossing - Schedule C & D As the prime contractor for this project we are requesting utility crossing consent. We will be installing sanitary sewer & water for the City of Renton parallel to the existing transmission line. The lines we are installing will be to the west of Seattle water department's transmission line. Therefore, we are requesting use of existing service line and crossing of existing water line to gain access to construction site. The transmission line will not be crossed parallel to the sanitary sewer line with trucks. All materials will be transported by loader. With the exception of the upper power line area. Two, eight foot, by twenty foot, by one inch steel plates will be placed to distribute a lesser load on thirty six inch transmission line. Eight foot, by twenty foot, by one inch Steel plates will be used when crossing the thirty six inch water main; this will be done periodically. The only time the transmission line will be crossed is when materials are brought in on the upper road; which will also be covered by two steel plates placed elongated, side by side across the water line which will give a bearing surface of sixteen feet by twenty feet. If you should have questions regarding this request, please contact John V at (206) 235-0524. incereI , 41YI t — ----- --_ - - — --- Suu Q� M S'rcc.L PI w i'.�, SiG� L PL •"fe- OUT OXONIMOISIMMI Ma To perform the work in the contract, DDJ Const. will have to cross the SWD owned 36" water line at the two locations shown above. DDJ Const.'s access from the south side of the river will be limited to: a 235 Caterpillar excavator, a 320L Caterpillar excavator, a 950H Caterpillar loader and pick-ups. Please find attached equipment specifications for the above referenced equipment. Calculations show that none of the proposed equipment exceeds the 10,000 pounds per square foot load limit. To protect the SWD 36" water line, steel plates 8 ft x 20 ft x I in. thick, will be placed at locations of equipment crossing. The access road will be regraded at various locations, and base course gravel will be installed per contract specifications. Performance Data Wheel Loaders a 95OF Series 11 High Lip Rock General Purpose Willi Ail Stand �- Wl� bucket c+ - Teeth Teeth 6 Buckets aucketTyp e and Solt -on Edges 6 Segments Ed es Segments Avsilabls Udge; - 9- $ r._.---- 9,ucktw-ily Ground Engaging Teeth 2.7 2.7 2'7 2,7 3.S0 Same Tools (cont'd) - - 2.7 3.50 3.50 3.50 2.31 Same y(dtl� Capacity, rated (§) yd, 3.50 2.34 2.28 2.32 3.02 Same --- rn' acil struck Yd+ Cap y 2.40 3.14 3.06 2.98 28i 1 3.07 2-8i5 ygt5 Same Sarno On'P c and 45' d1sch _- mm 2811 2777 109'.11-111 tit' Ili' -2820 2661 •558 Asacn Wldtl,�- In 111' y906 2830 8•g- •22.0' sS'discharge - mm - clearante et lull lilt Ou 2830 9'3' _ 916' g•3• - 1190 9.3• a2S 1222 1351 +1.0' iirach 2130 mm (7'0 d 4ftAn and 45' discharge - mm -t 19B 1116 3 6 3.11- 6,0- 3.5• _ - tb99 .462 pail, Reach at full lift snd thin 3'11' 1G15 1680 1699 SIB- •16.2' and bucket le, 45' discharge. - 45' discharge end 1600 5'6' 5.4- 5 6' 5 g 249J 2694 a425 Diong Depth Reach at ftln 7.0' clearance (§) " 2130 rrx71 ( ) 1-- 2500 2356 2500 8.3. g 10' •1 GX g'2' rrlm Reach with lift arm nori7onlal iVln e'3 7 9' _' 61 25 60 36 +25 1 O,elah length • and bucket level- - rnm 36 bb 2.6' 2.4' _ - 2'6 - •S2S 7936 'J- 699in9 Depth (§) �^ 1.4' 7567 -7672 26'0' .20.T Reran height , --�`� mm acratl length l§) (V r, 7603 2S 2' 24.10 25'2" 5247 2s'3 25'3= S388 5388 +556 •22.0'', it full raise Lmdor clearan _ n,m 5247 5247 17'3" 1T3" - 17'6"- 1T6' t3905 •231 yekelincen pveralt height with bucket tt/In t7'3' t 3 794 13 8A7 13 89e e5'7" +9.3' _ gaffe tipping to at Cult raise (§) m � m t 3 647 45,3- 45-5' a5'7' araighl' Loadar clearance circle with In carry Position (§) S.C. - -- -- t 1 630 i 1 74l 4501, gale lipping Ic bucket - $tatic lipping bad' 9 k i t B80 11 G47 25,682 t 1 6 t 3 25- 25,646 25,889 -Ia71. , t0 672 -bss., be+kovt lo'ce' Straight lb 25,195 10 813 10 592 10 553 70 563 _2 X2 23.291 23.532 k 9 Full 35'tum lb 23,993 23,355 .23,269 163 - ta3 143 "8'6- -ia- �etatingl^/eit �r�kN BreakoutForce (§) lb ,,5 35,907 157 35,388 36,675 16 494 32,208 32,208 a210 - 16 445 16 St 4 Itpp q bar 'Ortr,ahnr �_� kg 16 359 36,369Oaayrti 36.413 36,261 lo, n r V68102 operating Weight" (§) Ib 36,138 36,166 trap knt t0 n t lilt. Add O' auDlfecl es stand8 d i9 102 T m 1'- h ah anaaJ6,neru. High tAt coltr<i,,, aro-,s peCllicate^C a a puckeu cno n can De used high aical'•a,c. tit ncentc end oDareto . lush la eppropnat0 bucxcl to eatcuiale Ngh en spec I;fc'- It'll Wel Ill At', J73inl, d men_-iOK lot bucket' \ ub and BOPS. 27 5.2+ nf. J732c eno-- S w from apccllrcalbns 9 n:nclude zound-c„pp'eteod bad and OVo,114V "e19N a•n-d .Alh ""'enact adus� dlmcnebnc .. Sla6c ttppkIg (earl+ and ovnran length 6~Zion_- lot bucksa enviW° p,<tal Oimens;m:. Inc. uses aclue�eWtlD� Engt heart. SaE Smnoa,dc J7J2c and J7a2b �s cab o J •••Oump clearance. the cunir,g edge. _Ote'ptaa, Sor�70l to fetleCt the d;menaion v:in9eontWmtO aft at,gl,catYe _-latdatda rcco,nn, Au1fYnori.e ChIrn, In AA1 25 16 PR (I 5 GP-?E: note: 5petliKstions and rating .,:denoted k, ttre teat by 61- Change In Weight Stal c TlpQln S XHA p raY✓gs end operating b g9 20PRI k lu k134 - _ 1�7 - 390 109 • GP.2E 5, XHA I Remove cab Only. OPS r malns ... ' .. ..... .. .. ' ' t71 . 377 707 325 • 717 Q) . 260 ; e XGLA }t ..... 23.S-R25, (L•3) steel radial • • .. ......... GP-28 (L'2�) . ..... . 409 . 902 _1319 - 380 - a - S98 - 365 i. 23.5•R25. .. . ............................. Steel radial ... - • .............. 23.5 R25 XHA. lL'3) s . ............... 57A -t286 a 950 - 27a - 20.5.25,12 PR(L-21 .... ........ .... .. ........... •. ... _ a31 - 895 - 758 20.5-2S. 16 PR (L 2) ............. ..... .. ........... • • ' ' ' ' .. _ 406 - - 803 - 231 - }q 20.5.25. 16 PR (L-3) ............. ........ (L•273) steel radial .. ..... .. ..... ..... .... .. .. 364 3e 1 _ 536 -1182 r 20.5•R2S, GP•2B 20.5-R2S, XHA (L•3) s teal radial .... .. ......... ... .. 819 .1806 . t070 .� .1533 20.5-R25 XGLA (L•Z) steel radial ... - , ..... , t t 7 t .2582 The ballast: 20.5.25 bias Ply "' ... . Tire ballast 23 .',•2S Dias Ply tires .. . •.. of �t.Fs •, Cs� 3 C, 1lC�YS�r y5zA.-7S-(' Si~ a.�o1 12-12 Jl tvu JC -fflull I -n�.qY gIVIJ Ground Pressure : is the is and :)n and section triple g !red fo1 to groUE essures jium st, rssure 1 2 3 .1 l2 �A 3.0 4.1 t9.2 )4.3 31.4 p;: Shoe width pressure ShoeType rnm In OR pel Triple 600 24 44.04 6.39 Triple 700 28 38.44 5.57 iI Triple 000 32 34.05 4.24 Apox Triple 600 32 600 24 34.39 4.99 41.04 S.9S Triple 700 28 35.85 Triple 800 32 31.77 Z46Apex 800 32 32.12 Triple 500 20 i 54.50 7.90 i Triple 600 24 50.01 7.25 I�4 I Triple 700 28 43.15 6.26 :y. Triple 800 32 38.25 5.55 _ II 1 ' Triple 600 24 46JO 6.69 Triple 700 28 40.21 5.83 i . Triple 800 32 35.30 5.12 J t 49.03 7.11 49.38 7.16 ! Triple 600 24 ` Triple 600 ' 24 Triple 700 28 42.3 6.13 11 Triple 800 32 37.02 6.37 I Triple 600 24 } 54.92 7.90 II Triple 700 26 48.05 6.97 I!j Triple 800 32 42.17 6.11 . Triple -- 600 24 'I 51.90 7.54 A Triple 700 28 45.11 6.54 Triple 800 32 40.21 5.60 "X 900 35 35.30 6.12 Triple 600 24 _ 61.98 7.54 `~ Triple 600 24 66.69 9.67 Triple 750 30 53.9-1 7.82 Triple - 850 33 49.03 7.11 jlr w(Cm have dirterent grarnd pressures. See Tecrin", Oa4 sheors. 1q� 6� S� C 3 . O 00 o� I� 4-105 rtG; ECIFICATIONS Nelghts (approximate) standard 235D LC Excavators and 235D Excavators ,2 �a3" fo Sv n e ,q 9- 3hipping weight With adjustable carbody: Stick ..........................2440 mm/8'0" 48 441 kg/106,827 lb 48 324 kg/106,536 Ib 46 398 kg/102,290 Ib 45 600 kg/100,630 lb ............. I ...... I .............. 2900 mm/9'6" 48 555 kg/107,017 lb 48 418 kg/106,726 Ib 46 404 kg/102,400 lb 46 606 kg/100,720 lb .............. .I..... .........3660 mm/12'0" 48 814 kg/107,637 lb 48 691 kg/107,345 1b 46 765 kg/103,099 lb 45 967 kg/101,340 lb .................................4672 mm/15'0" 49 444 kg/109,026 lb 49 321 kg/108,734 Ib 47 395 kg/104,400 lb 46 597 kg/102,729 lb 7perating weight: Stick ..........................2440 mm/8'0" 48 902 kg/107,811 Ib 48 779 kg/107,539 Ib 46 853 kg/103,293 lb 46 055 kg/101,634 lb .................................. 2900 mm/9'6" 48 980 kg/108,001 lb 48 857 kg/107,711 lb 46 931 kg/103,465 lb 46 133 101,708 ]b 3660 mm/12'0" 49 269 kg/108,621 lb 49 116 k 108,348 lb 47 220 k 104,102 lb 46 422 ke102,343 lb 4572 mm/15'0" 49 891 kg/110,010 Ib 49 768 kg/109,720 lb 47 842 kg/105,474 Ib 47 044 kg/103,714 lbl Ground pressure: 54 bar/ 66.6 kPa/.65 bar/ 78.6 kPa/.79 bqr/ 102.7 kPa/.1.03 bar/ Stick ......... _.............3660 rn"12'0" 7.9 ps 9.5 psi 11.4 psi 14.9 psi . 2 x a Shipping weig)it with narrow. fixed carbody: Stick .........................2440 mm/8'0" 46 368 kg/102,224 lb 46 254 kg/101,991 Ib 44 473 kg/98,046 lb 43 735 kg/90,419 lb 2900 mm/9'6" 46 454 kg/102,414 Ib 46 340 kg/102,161 lb 44 555 kg/98,258 1b 43 821 kg/96,885 1b 3660 mW12'0" 46 735 kg/103,033 lb 46 621 kg/102,801 lb .44 840 kg/98,855 Ib 44 102 kg/97,228 ]b 4572 mm/16'0" 47 365 kgf104,422 lb 47 251 kg/104,190 lb 4S 470 kg/100,244 Ib 44 732 kg/98,617 lb Operating weight: Stick .........................2440 mm/8'0" 46 814 kg/103,207 Ib 46 700 kg/102,97G lb 44 919 kg/99,029 lb 44 181 kg/97,402 lb 2900 mm/9'8" 46 900 kg/ 103,397 Ib 46 786 kg/103,165 lb 45 005 k09,219 lb 44 267 kg/97,592 Ib 3660 mm/12'0" 47 182 kg/104,018 Ib 47 068 kg/103,785 lb 46 287 kg/99,841 Ib 44 649 kg/98,214 lb 4572 mm/15'0" 47 811 kg/105,405 lb 47 697 kg/105,174 lb 45 916 kg/101,227 Ib 45 178 kg/99,600 lb :,round press.ue: 57.9 kl'a/.58 bar/ 69.3 UL/.69 bar/ 83.4 kPa/.83 bar/ 109.6 kPa/1.09 bar/ Stick ........................3660 mm/12'0" 8.4 psi 10.0 lsf 12.1 psi 16.9 psi 'Deduct 2266 kgi5,000 lb for optional 5443 kb/12,000 1b counter- eibl�t. -1.-) ulYy ,- I/1�� PSG standard Removal Weights kg Lb Counterweight ............................. 7711 17,000 3660 innV12'0" Stick with bucket linkage ................. 2240 4,939 2900 nkrn/9'6" Stick µitll bucket linkage ....... '.......... 1959 4,319 2440 mrr/8'0" Stick with bucket linkage ................. 1872 4,129 see chart, pages 14 and 15 for individual hucket weights. ��� City of Seattle Norman B. Ricc, Mavoi Seattle Public Utilities Diana Gale, Director January 27, 1997 Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer City of Renton 200 Mill Ave. S. Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Design of Seattle Public Utilities East Side Supply blowwoff and City of Renton's Rolling Hill 590 Zone Watermain Crossing. Dear Mr. Gafour: Enclosed you will find two original documents of the East Side Supply Line Blowoff No. 1 Agreement. This agreement is patterned after the previous Agreement for Design Services between King County/Metro and the City of Renton. If you would please have both documents signed and return them as soon as possible we can then execute them. Thank you and if there are any questions, please feel free to contact me at (206) 684-5977. Since Charles Madden, P.E. Acting Manager Seattle Public Utilities Dexter Horton Building, 1 Oth floor 710 Second Avenue, Seattle WA 98104 Tel: (206) 684-5851, TTY/TDD (206) 233-7241, FAX: (206) 684-4631 An equal -employment opportunity, affirmative action employer. Accommodations for people with disabilities provided on request. O IS Seattle Water Robert P. Oroncznack, superintendent Norman B. Rice, Mayor December 10, 1996 Abdoul Gafour City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Utility Crossing Permit for Cedar River Utility Pipelines Permit #U96-004, B.M. pg. 371 Dear AbdouI: Thanks for sending Renton's signed document along with your assurance that Renton would not proceed with construction of the sewer lines until King County and Seattle reach agreement. It seems a good idea just to include that language (item 13) in the document so that relationships on this project are clear. If you approve this revision, please have both originals of the enclosed document signed on behalf of the City of Renton and return them to me for signature by SWD. Your cooperative spirit is truly appreciated. Sincerely, ,^ Donna M. Kruger Sr. Real Property Agent Real Estate Services Encs. cc: Charlie Madden Dexter Horton Building, loth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 0 Printed on Recycled Paper ".ENGINEERS z' PLANNERS . SCIENTISTS (zj r November 13,4996 9,96 Abdoul Gafour City of Renton ;�. 200 MillAve. S Renton,: WA 98055 L'ia•Mail .. Subject: Revised Proposal for Design of ESSL Blowoff Dear Abdoul: We have modified our proposal: for the Seattle Water Department (SWD) ESSL 131owoff per SWD's comments.:We have also identified additional design criteria and assumptions. It is our understanding that it is the C4's.intention to have the successful bidder.from'the next phase of the. Cedar River. Crossing project. do this work as ,a change order. Therefore, the: specifications for the Cedar River Crossing Project will b.e.used for project adnurnstration ;and the specifications on the plans will be' limited to materials and equipment . for the SWD Bl'owoff Should you; wish to proceed; we suggest that we enter m—to.an agreement where RH2.will perform the -tasks as outlined 'in. the- attached sco,pe,bf..work-for a fixed fee 'of $9,200- 90%: . to be'payable upon submittal. of;the 90% review plans :with specif cations with the:remaining.. . 10% payable upon submittal of final plans. If you have 'ariy questions -or concerns, please contact me af, your earliest convenience. Sincerely,- RH2.Engineering, Inc. Tonyf-Pairdi, P.E. . RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S. RH2 COLUMBIA ENGINEERING 8383 158th.Avenue N.E. 139 S. Worthen Suife,200 opportunity Building Suite,A Redmond, WA 98052 Wenatchee; WA .98801 .(206) 869-1488 •., (206) 453-0241 (509) 663-0150 FAX (206) 869-7769. FAX,(509) 663-7975. 1=800-720-8052 1-800-721-8052 SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ESSL BLOWOFF #1 EXHIBIT A, SCOPE OF WORK TASK ONE - DESIGN PURPOSE: To design a replacement for an existing Seattle Water Department (SWD) blowoff near the south bank of the Cedar River at the Cascade Siphon. The proposed blowoff will use the existing 36" main tap and valve chamber, but will discharge into a new King County Water Pollution Control Division (KCWPCD) manhole that will be constructed as part of the "Cedar River Utility Crossing: Schedule D - Cascade Siphon Replacement". APPROACH: Design Criteria: Attend a design criteria meeting with City and SWD.City to provide RH2 with a written list of SWD design criteria and as-builts of existing valve chamber and tap. Criteria to be identified shall include: • Identifying the extent of the existing blowoff to be reused. • Configuration and appurtenances for the proposed valve chamber. • Discharge pipe diameter and material. • Configuration and appurtenances for the air gap at KCWPCD manhole. • Design pressure • SWD material and specification preferences and applicable standard details. Preliminary plans prepared by the SWD for the Cascade Siphon Replacement Project" will be used as a design basis. Develop Design Plan Base: Using the Cedar River .Utility.Crossing plans as a startingpoint, create CAD base plans for the SWD improvements. Information to be reused includes the existing site topography and features, contours, existing utilities, property lines and right of way lines. Blowoff Design: Develop design plans that describe and detail the proposed SWD improvements. Plans to include locating and detailing the valve chamber and the discharge at the KCWPCD manhole, and plan and profile along the discharge pipe. All material and equipment specifications will be included on the plans. The aforementioned plans prepared by the SWD will be used as a basis for the level of detail. Design Review: Forward 90% design plans to the City for City and SWD review. Attend review meeting with City. City to provide City and SWD review comments in written form. Incorporate Design Review Comments: Incorporate the City's and SWD's review comments into the design plans. Final Plans: Finalize the design plans and forward six sets of plans (24" x 36") to the City. It is anticipated that the City will have the work performed as a change order to schedules C&D of the Cedar River Crossing project. Therefore, the Cedar River Crossing project contract documents will provide supplemental specifications. FADATA\REN\S40-005\Scope of Work\SOW for SWD BlowofEdoc 11/13/96 10,24 AM 0 , Seattle Water Department ESSL Blowoff #1 DELIVERABLE PRODUCTS: 1. Attend a design criteria meeting 2. 90% Draft Review Design Plans (3 sets, 3 sheets, 24" x 36") within 60 days after design criteria meeting and receipt of design criteria 3. Attend a 90% review meeting 4. Final Design Plans (6 sets, 3 sheets, 24" x 36") 2 weeks after receipt of review comments PROPOSAL ASSUMPTIONS 1. A physical air gap will provide the only cross connection protection. 2. Design not to include provisions for neither surge or freeze protection. 3. Design pressure is less than 250 psi. 4. A maximum of two meetings, first for design criteria, second for 90% review. 5. All design criteria to be established and verified at design criteria meeting. 6. All 90% review comments received complete, at one time, within 2 weeks of receipt of review plans. CITY PROVIDED SERVICES: 1. Meeting/review coordination with SWD 2. Access to existing valve chamber 3. Obtain as -built data of existing blowoff 4. Design review 5. Construction administration 6. Easements and permits 7. All other services -2- REN/195.020'SOW for SWD Blo—f .dm 't Seattle Water Diana Gala, suparintandant Norman B. Rice, Mayor November 13, 1996 Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Utility Crossing consent for Cedar River Utility Pipeline Consents #U-96-004 and #U96-009, (ESSL at Cedar River) Dear Abdoul: Although we were disappointed that you were not able to attend the meeting October 30, King County and SWD reached an understanding as outlined in Stan Hummel's November 4 letter. Accordingly, I have drafted the revised document to replace the one which Renton signed on August 8, 1996. Most changes and additions, blue -highlighted for your convenience, simply reflect that Renton is in charge of construction for this project. King County asked for the more favorable wording of Item 7. Stan Hummel concurs with you that no agreement has been reached about maintaining the fish channel. To resolve this, I put the same access language in both Renton and King County's Utility Crossing Consent. A copy of King County's document is also enclosed. SWD requests that both Renton and King County sign these documents before you advertise Phase II of this project. Please call me at 684-5969 to discuss any questions or concerns. Sincerely, c--�� •C'"ZLIL�L Donna M. Kruger Sr. Real Property Agent Real Estate services cc: Rod Boyd Stan Hummel Charlie Madden Enclosures Dexter Horton Building, loth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 0 Printed on Recycled Paper King County Water Pollution Control Division DeFartment of Natural Resources 821 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-1598 November 4, 1996 Donna Kruger Property Agent Real Property Section Seattle Water Department 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 t� 61996 CITY CV RENTON Engineering Dept SUBJECT: Cedar River Crossing Project - Resolution of Right -of -Way Issues Dear Donna: Thank you for meeting with us to clarify our understandings regarding the agreements that will need to be developed for the Cedar River Crossing project. As we discussed, the City of Renton is the lead agency of a joint project to design, permit and construct a joint pipeline crossing of the Cedar River. Phase I of the project was completed in September, 1996 which included installation of four casings in the riverbed and construction of a receiving manhole on the North side of the river. Phase II is scheduled for bid in December, 1996 and will include the remainder of the sewer and water line piping, wetlands restoration, and construction of a groundwater fed spawning channel. With regards to permits required for this project, we agreed that the following actions will need to occur: SWD will modify the existing Utility Crossing Consent Agreement issued to the City of Renton to reflect the City's lead responsibility for the construction of the sewer and water lines. Considering that King County is not responsible for construction, a separate agreement for construction with KC is unnecessary. SWD will prepare separate permits to grant King County and the City of Renton access to our respective pipelines for ongoing operation and maintenance. These permits will provide for ingress and egress for the ongoing operation, maintenance, construction, reconstruction and repair of the facilities and appurtenances As we discussed, we will continue to pursue with SWD the amendment of our existing permanent easement adding the new six CLEAN WATER -A SOUND INVESTMENT foot portion of pipe to be installed and attached to our existing 12-inch sewer pipeline within that permanent easement. The City of Renton has informed me that they intend to advertise Phase II of this project in December, 1996. This being the case, our respective agencies will need to move quickly to develop the necessary permits to allow this project to move forward. I appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and discuss this issue. Please call me at 684-1844 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stan Hummel Project Manager cc: Abdoul Gafour, City of Renton Rod Boyd, King County Charlie Madden, SWD (I tle LOP' wTQ • 27- 21LL CITY OF RENTON ..LL Planning/Building/Public Works Department ]else Tanner, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator September 19, 1996 Mr. Brian Spindor, P.E. Seattle Water Dexter Horton Building, I Oth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Proposal for Design of Blow -Off Connection for Seattle Water ESSL#1 Dear Brian: For your review, enclosed is the draft scope of work from RH2 Engineering to design the connection of the blow -off on the ESSL# I to the Cascade siphon sewer line. The estimated total cost of the design is $6,895.00 (see Exhibit B for breakdown of total cost). Please advise me in writing if Seattle Water would like to proceed with the design per the proposal or if you have any revisions that need to be included in the final scope of work. Payment for the design can be done through a purchase order from Seattle to Renton, and I will prepare an addendum to our existing contract with RH2 Engineering to perform the work. Please call me at 277-6210 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, 6U., &Out�, Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer CC: Lys Hornsby - Renton Water Stan Hummel - King County WPC Tony Pardi - RH2 Engr. Enclosures H:\590zone\96-062AG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 9 This paper contains 50 % recycled material, 20% post consumer September 19, 1996 Mr. Brian Spindor, P.E. Seattle Water Dexter Horton Building, 1 Oth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Proposal for Design of Blow -Off Connection for Seattle Water ESSL#1 Dear Brian: For your reviewenclosedis the draft -Of scope of work from RH2 Engineering for the design of the connection from the blow -off for the ESSL# 1 to the King County new Cascade siphon sewer line replacement. The estimated total cost of the design is $6,895.00 (see Exhibit B for breakdown of total cost). Please advise me in writing if Seattle Water would like to proceed with the design per the proposal or if you have any revisions that need to be included in the final scope of work. Payment for the design can be done through a purchase order from Seattle to Renton, and I will prepare an addendum to our existing contract with RH2 Engineering to perform the work. Please call me at 277-6210 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer CC: Lys Hornsby - Renton Water Stan Hummel - King County WPC Tony Pardi - RH2 Engr. Enclosures H:\590zone196-062AG SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ESSL BLOWOFF #1 EXHIBIT A, SCOPE OF WORK TASK ONE - DESIGN PURPOSE: To design a replacement for an existing Seattle Water Department (SWD) blowoff near the south bank of the Cedar River at the Cascade Siphon. The proposed blowoff will use the same 36" main tap, but will discharge into a new King County Water Pollution Control Division (KCWPCD) manhole that will be constructed as part of the "Cedar River Utility Crossing: Schedule D - Cascade Siphon Replacement". APPROACH: Design Criteria: Attend a meeting with the City of Renton and SWD to establish design criteria. Preliminary plans prepared by the SWD for the Cascade Siphon Replacement Project" will be used as a design basis. Criteria to be established during meeting shall include: • Identifying the extent of the existing blowoff to be reused. • Configuration and appurtenances for the proposed valve chamber. • Confirmation of discharge pipe diameter. • Configuration and appurtenances for the air gap at KCWPCD manhole. Visit the site to verify visible features. Prepare minutes from meeting and forward to the City for verification. Develop Design Plan Base: Using the Cedar River Utility Crossing plans as a starting point, create CAD base plans for the SWD improvements. Information to be reused includes the existing site topography and features, contours, existing utilities, property lines and right of way lines. Blowoff Design: Develop design plans that describe and detail the proposed SWD improvements. Plans to include locating and detailing the valve chamber and the discharge at the KCWPCD manhole, and plan and profile along the discharge pipe. All specifications will be included on the plans. The aforementioned plans prepared by the SWD will be used as a basis for the level of detail. Design Review Meeting. Forward 90% design plans to the City for City and SWD review. Attend a 90% design review meeting with the City and SWD. Incorporate Design Review Comments: Incorporate the City's and SWD's review comments into the design plans. Final Plans: Finalize the design plans and forward six sets of plans (24" x 36") to the City. It is anticipated that SWD will have the blowoff constructed by selecting a contractor from their small works roster. REW 95.02060W fir SWD BI-f Ax 09/16/96 1:34 PM Seattle Water Department ESSL Blowoff #1 DELIVERABLE PRODUCTS: r _ _ a 1. Attend a Design Criteria Meeting L J 2. Design Criteria Meeting Minutes to the City - 3. 90% Draft Review Design Plans (3 sets, 3 sheets, 24" x 36") _ 4. Final Design Plans (6 sets, 3 sheets, 24" x 36") i-: CITY AND PROVIDED SERVICES: 1. Meeting/Review coordination with SWD 2. Obtain as -built data of existing blowoff 3. Design Review 4. Construction Administration -2- REN/05.02MOW fm SWD Blowoff*c Seattle Water Department - ESSL Blowoff #I EXHIBIT B SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES HOURLY RATES CI.ASSIFiCATION RATE CLASSIFICATION RATE Principal E.DC _ .$112.00 Engineering Technician .............__..._.__._.._..._._..._........_........ $72.00 Principal E VIII� $112.00 Engineering Technician . Principal E VII $106.00 Engineering Technician ..............__.................................... . _T-9.......... . $48 :00„ Project Manager E VI $99.00 Project Manager ................ - _........ - _ 7 E V $93.00 `- 'J Scientist IV $95.00 _.._._.._......................................... Scientist .__......_ III $93.00 Computer Specialist W_......_ ............._..............._. [V .__... __._....._.. ............_ $84.00 .__......... Scientist II_..................$...7...2_...0...0...... Computer Specialist III_.._..._....._._......__.._._..__........0... .... Scientist _...._.... I $55.00 Computer Specialist _ [I _....._....._$78..0..0 $72.0 Project Engineer ... . _. . E IV ___ $84.00 Computer Specialist [ ..... . Project Engineer E III_._._.__.._.................._$84.00 Administrative Assistant ................. $53.00 ...... Staff Engineer E II _$71.00... Staff Engineer E 1....._... . $65.00 Technical Editor . $53 :00 Senior Planner V $84.00 Word Processor [II $53.00 Word Processor II $44.00 Engineering Technician $84.00 Word Processor __._..._._.._._..... __......._.._._._r.. _ I ........................................._........................... $34.00 Engineering Technician _.__.—____.........._...........$78.00 Office Aid $29.00 IN-HOUSE SERVICES In house copies (each) 81/2" X 11" $0.10 In-house CAD system (hour) _............... ........ . _ $25.00 In-house copies (each) 81/2" X 14 $0.25 HP650C prints (each) _..._.......__................._..._�..._._.__...... 11 X 17" __ ........ $2 00 ... In-house copies (each) I I" X 17" $0.50 HP650C prints (each) _....._... -----..................._........._._.. 24" X 36" ............................... $5.00 blueprints (each) 24" X 36" $1.20 HP650C prints (each) ....................... _.... _... _....... 36" X 48" $10.00 FAX (each sheet) $3.00 In-house computer (hr) .............................._.................................` $9.00 . HIP Pai�et (each sheet) $1.50 Mileage (mile) $032 MAI 1111- PURCHASED SERVICES YRM 1 All purchased printing, copying, miscellaneous and subconsultant services are billed at cost plus 15`K. CHANGES IN RATES Rates listed here are adjusted annually. The current, most recent schedule of hourly rates is used for billing purposes. Payment for work accomplished shall be on the basis of hourly rates in effect at the time of billing plus direct expenses and outside services as stated in this Exhibit. Page i SWD Blowoff Fee Estimate.xls Seattle Water Department - ESSL Blowoff #1 EXHIBIT C TASK ONE -DESIGN Principal $112.00 Project Manager $99.00 Staff Engineer $71.00 Technician $65.00 Word Processor $44.00 DIRECT PERSONNEL COST TASK TWO - DESIGN Principal I Proj Mgr I Staff Engr I Engr Tech I Word Proc HrsJ Costl Hr.%J Costl Hrsl Costl firs Costl HrsJ Cast TOTAL, Design Criteria Meeting with Renton & SWD SO 4 S396 SO so 2 S88 S484 Develop Base Plans for Design -- - - $o 2' S198 4 $284 2 S130 $o $612_ Blowoff Design 2 $224 4 5396 16 S1.136 8 S520 4 S176 S2.452 Design Review Meeting So a S396 $o $0 2 $88 S484 Incorporate Design Review Comments $o a S396 6 S426 $o So S822_ S416 Final Plans - Y) 2 S19S So 2 S130 1 2 "S SUBTOTAL DESIGN PERSONNEL COSTS 21 S224 1 20! S1980 1 261 s1,846 1 121 S7801 101 S440 1 $5,270 1 DESIGN NON -PERSONNEL COSTS Miscellaneous Expenses Reproduction Expenses In -House Computer In -House CAD $50 _50 $625 SUBTOTAL DESIGN NON -PERSONNEL EXPENSES $1,625 I DESIGN TOTAL $6,895 I OLC ft�vy W2-19-2222 r* Seattle Water Diana Gale, Superintendent Norman B. Rice, Mayor September 9, 1996 Abdoul Gafour Civil Engineer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Gafour: 2�W77Tr? rp 7 V S E P 1 G -1996 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. Now that the instream work is complete on the Cedar River, I would like to clear up some remaining issues with construction near the Cedar Eastside Supply Line. On August 12th, we met to discuss the permit requirements for working in SWD right of way. This was subsequently followed up by you with a letter on August 16th. Under condition no. 2, your letter states that the construction will take place easterly of the ESSL. This should have read westerly of the ESSL. During the second phase of the construction please submit a similiar assessment of axle loads in the vicinity of the pipeline and where armouring will be used at critical pipeline crossings. Under condition no. 4, the permit requires Renton to pave the roadway down the hill for slope stabilization. Seattle is willing to consider having the slope regraded and resurfaced with crushed rock. Contact Charlie Madden to review drawings and specifications for the regrade and resurface. Understandably the first phase of the contract was on a very fast schedule to get the work completed during the low flow period in the river, however, SWD should be notified at the earliest opportunity to provide inspection. During the next phase of the contract please contact Joe Michelson at 255-2242, Wes Edens at 684-5933, and Charlie Madden at 684-5977 at least two week prior to any construction work. If you have any further questionspjels�contact me at 684-8512 Brian SeniQ cc: C. Madden D. Kruegar B. Schwartz G. Schneider J. Michelson W. Edens Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 0 Printed on Recycled Paper CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public.Works Department J e Tanner, Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator October 28, 1996 Mr. Charles Madden, P.E. Seattle Water Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Agreement for Design and Construction of Blow -Off Connection for ESSL#1 Dear Charlie: Enclosed are copies of the utilities cooperation agreements between the City and King County for the design and construction of the water and sewer pipelines. I hope that Seattle Water can come up with a similar agreement between Renton and.Seattle for the design and construction of the blow -off. It is important that the agreement.be completed before December 1996. The City and King County are planning to bid the water and sewer pipelines project in December 1996, with construction starting in March 1997. Please call me at 277-6210 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, •_V1iJW/ �KV F .. Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer CC: Lys Hornsby - Renton Water' Stan Hummel -King County WPC - Rick Harbert, Tony Pardi - RH2.Engr. Enclosures H:\590zone\96-062AG 200 M��i^!l'�ll Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 1MThm nnnpr rnntains 50 % rprvrlprl material. 2n % nnct rn—impr � Seattle Water alone Gala. Superintendent r�r. 2 1996 Norman B. Ries. Mayor October 16, 1996 � t�z U*,i Mr. Abdoul Gafour At `_`u N Qcu di City of Renton Planning/Building/Public Works Department 200 Mill Avenue So. Renton, WA 98055 SUBJECT: Proposal for Design of Blow -off Connection for ESSL B.O. #1 Dear Abdoul: The letter is in response to your letter of September 19 and the draft Scope of Work prepared by RH2 Engineering for design services. In reviewing the draft Scope of Work, the Seattle Water Department's (SWD) comments are as follows: • On the Blowoff Design task, the specifications should be included in the specifications instead of the plans only. • On the task for "Final Plans", SWD would like the blowoff to be constructed with contract for the water main and sewer construction. SWD would like to proceed with the blowoff design work outlined in your letter along with the modifications requested in our comments. Also, an interagency agreement will need to be established to authorize the exchange of funds between agencies for design and construction. If you have any questions or comments, please call me at 684-5977. Sincerely, Charles Madden Supervising Civil Engineer cc: Bruce Jones, SWD Jack Herold, SWD Faith Fogarty, SWD Mike Brennan, SWD Stan Hummel, King County WPC Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 �^y, Printed on Recycled Paper O%WN" a ort-J ' Jesse Tanner, Mayor July 26, 1996 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E.; Administrator Ms. Donna Kruger Real Estate Services Seattle Water Department Dexter Horton Building, I Ith Floor 710 Second Avenue'- Room 1122 Seattle, WA 98104 SUBJECT: Utility Crossing Permit for Cedar River Utility Pipelines Permit HU96-004 Dear Donna: Enclosed is a copy of the construction plan for the Cedar River Utility Crossing project, showing the proposed Renton water line and the King County sewer lines within the 60 foot wide City of Seattle Mercer Island Pipeline right-of-way.. I have also shown the dimensions. from the proposed utilities in relation to the 36" Seattle pipeline. I will provide you with a copy the "as -built" plan for the proposed utilities after the completion.of the projed. . A legal.description of the area to be covered under the Utility. Crossing permit or Consent. Agreement is also attached for your use If you _,have aay, questions, please feel free to contact meat 277-62'10 -and thank you: very much for your help on,.this -matter.. Sincerely,-,.: Abdoul Gafour• Water. Utility. Engineer CC: Stan Hummel, King County Water Pollution Control Dan Ervin, P.E., RH2 Engineering, P.S. Lys Hornsby, Ron Olsen, City of Renton H\590zone196-043AG 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055-. LEGAL DESCRIPTION CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING (for City of Renton Water Line & King County Water Pollution Control Sewer Lines) A portion of the 60 foot wide City of Seattle Mercer Island Pipeline right-of-way lying within the Northeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the westerly right-of-way line of the above 60 foot wide City of Seattle Mercer Island Pipeline right-of-way, with the southerly curb and gutter line of Maple Valley Highway (SR-169) as it now exists; thence easterly along said southerly curb and gutter line of Maple Valley Highway, a distance of 60 feet; thence southerly, perpendicular to said southerly curb and gutter line of Maple Valley Highway, a distance of 34 feet to the southerly margin of the City of Renton Cedar River Trail as it now exists; thence westerly along the south margin of the City of Renton Cedar River Trail and parallel with the southerly curb and gutter line of Maple Valley Highway, a distance of 60 feet; thence northerly perpendicular to said southerly curb and gutter line of Maple Valley Highway, a distance of 34 feet to the point of beginning. I I\590zonc196-044AG E, 5, PIF" R T - ------ ------ - - - ow AT SET ik, 5-. UTILITIES CONNECTION ELEVATION 5'-C Cll CFOSS 60 S-6, FF�,ASE VALV;� uz lsLhwD pl�Eu�f, P, 3 60 FWD PIPE-Utl,' WATER MAIN CONNECTION DETAIL 52 iC CY 90' az�z- Qrs RECEIVING MANHOLE i? C', Trl.PUST Cu' WTIH SHACKLE RcrDs 16' DI 90' BE- (Ri P[rirT,-AT--- SAM TAR SEW_R M.AAS TO OZ' SEAL j 0 -V WTH.BFICK A-10 VCRT.AR-FOR WATER "N k 21- -Y;STNG 24'. ACCESS TRANSITION MANHOLE i, = 5'-0* i SCI Tr-. , ED Uf- B I* ENGINEERS PLANNERS —7twz SCIENTISTS (NEE OILYM11A (360) 705-0628 (zoM 71J a^5? 2001 721- WO) 722-8052 NAAl*^, iS KO-i TO Sl,'L:: F BAR 15 NOT 2" LON, RENIX / 7 ILI ;CD r CEDAP JQ� joKER UT _ s 1 114 ull ITIES CONNECT1% PLAN AND ELEVATION cR.Jxjo I SCH I TV;, I oy I-. SNiAN vz City of Renton Finance Department Request for Claims Date of Request 7- Z q I Date Required ASS Requesting Department PI i!) IPVIJ Authorized Signature REASON FOR CHECK Deposit Refund Other x Name Amount Finance Receipt No TReceipt Date Describe Circumstances Requiring Issuance of Check: f e_e_ f�Y U } � G'�o ss 1��v van eC U - �1 — O0 Lf Ce d wt + v-es� u o SS i n V Vl�►fCtCLOY has -YoCa-0-6 IZZJ�] V vvut wu is + r--Q- PY o caeV s O Q s t.0 T TD Pv Jam. CHECK PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS Amount ls,5000" --harge to Account(s) �z1.0005-00.0,g. `t 0.603Lf. 6S- Payable To S ea I Address Soc Sec or IRS ID No CHECK AUTHORIZATION - Finance Department Use Only Approved Date 0 t5- :�O(o5 C 5506.s 1. ,C[o ) 0 Mail Check to Payee Return to Dept: 0 Other: 0 Claims Check No: CTY006/7/89 Aam- Mte* Diana Gale, Superintendent Norman 6_ Rice, Mayor July 3, 1.996 Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Re: Utility Crossing Permit ESSL at Cedar River Dear Mr. Gafour: Enclosed is the Utility Crossing Permit which you requested June 6, 1996. Our Operations staff added several conditions which were not in the preliminary list of conditions which Brian Spindor sent to you on June 5, 1996. These are in Special Conditions, Item 6 and Item 10. Please have the Permit signed as accepted by the City of Renton, and return it to me along with the permit fee of $500. I will expedite having it signed on behalf of the City of Seattle, and promptly return a fully signed copy to you. Should you have questions or concerns, my telephone number is 684-5969. Sincerely, Donna M: Kruger J Sr. Real Property Agent Real Estate Services n ,h a-mour500 i(yo y a n yecri It �a1�c✓ � r�Mcni s ci►urk �o 4 6" USA) Xrrr{,Y. w.o. A 421 . C66500. U't8. 5160. 0034. 65. 055065 5566� Dexter Horton Building, loth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, IVA 98104 C. Primed on Recycled Paper CITY OF RENTON uR"Im" Ci y ti. Jesse Tanner, Mayor July 10, 1996 Mr. Dan Ervin, P.E. RH2 Engineering, P.S. 8383 - 158th Avenue N.E. Suite 200 Opportunity Building Redmond, WA 98052 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator T.-_ "r^nt`3SMITTAL MEMO A of Pa^P� q iNGM COMTANY'i 1e�� VAV NHS. r2�F _ 6- v 6 Wa SUBJECT: Cedar River Utility Crossing - Permit from Seattle Water Department Dan: Enclosed is a copy of the utility crossing permit from Seattle water Department. The permit has not been executed by the City of Renton. Could you please review the conditions of the permit and let me know if they are reasonable for the City to comply with in the long term, and if our construction schedule allows us to meet the conditions. I have spoken to Donna Kruger (684-5969) of Seattle Water and have requested her to consider issuing a separate permit to Renton for the water line and one permit to King County WPC for the two sewer lines. I Neill also check v6th Stan Hummel on this issue. I am concerned over the following conditions: #7- "Protection of Renton facilities from stray current from existing or future Seattle cathodic protection system...". Do we need to install cathodic protection on our pipelines or install test stations to monitor the potential effect of stray current and does Seattle have cathodic protection on their line? Please advise us on this matter. # 11- "All work to be completed by July 31, 1996." I have spoken to Donna and she will change it to July 31, 1997. Special conditions: 44- "Paving shall extend to the toe of the hill". I did not anticipate that the City be required to pave the access road for Seattle. Please call me after your review of the permit. Thank you. Sincerely, Abdoul Gafour cc Lys Hornsby Stan Hunmlcl - KCWPC h/d i v/%%4d590zone/96-034/ag 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 �a 'S Seattle Water Diana Gale, Suparintendant Norman B. Rica, Mayor June 5, 1996 Abdoul Gafour City of Renton Utility Systems Division 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Permitting requirements for use of SWD Right of Way Dear Abdoul: Puri 1 o i996 In response to your request from last week, I have assembled a preliminary list of conditions which apply to the construction of the pipeline crossing. I emphasize these are strictly preliminary and will be subject to revision during the formal permit application process. Although these are preliminary, you should find that they will not change significantly during the review process. The City of Renton needs to begin the formal permitting process by submitting two complete sets of drawings to the Seattle Water Department. The drawings should be sent to: Seattle Water Department Attention: Donna Kruger, Property Management 710 2nd Avenue, Room 1122 Seattle WA 98104 Your cover letter should indicate that you will need a temporary use permit and a utility crossing permit you have any questions regarding the permits please contact Donna at 684-5969. Please keep me informed of your progress with department to insure your permitting process questions please contact me at 684-8512. f Sincere Brian Spind -E. Senior. i Enginene er Attachment cc: C. Madden G. Schneider B. Schwartz D. Kruger permitting process. I will be working from within the as quickly as possible. If you have any further If Dexter Horton Building, 1 Oth Floor 710 Second Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 0 Printed on Recycled Paper COMMENTS FOR SWD RIGHT OF WAY USE PERMIT CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING The following is a summary of key comments and conditions for use of the SWD ESSL Right of Way by the City of Renton and King County Water Pollution to construct a utility river crossing on the Cedar River. 1. Heavy equipment and materials shall not be stored on the ESSL since there is space allocated south of the ESSL ROW near the Cedar River in the plans. 2. Excavation for the river diversion shall not expose the ESSL or it's casing. Maintain 3-feet of cover over the ESSL where the diversion passes over this pipeline. Contractor must provide a submittal for SWD review/comment on this work. (What safety mechanisms will be in place to maintain the integrity of the diversion.) ' 3. As noted in the contract plans, all vehicles will be restricted to a 10,000 lb. per axle load limit within 10 feet of the ESSL centerline and an armored crossing will be required for construction equipment/traffic crossing the ESSL (such as steel plating, bridging structure, etc.). The contractor must provide SWD with a submittal for review/comment. 4. Extend paving to the toe of the hill since construction equipment will extend to the river's edge. Provide SWD with a submittal for review and comment on roadway surfacing. 5. Any excavations in the ESSL ROW will require shoring and support plans. In cases where the depth and size of the trench/excavation is within 5 feet of the ESSL or greater than 5 feet in depth, a plan will be required for SWD review. Parallel trenches or perpendicular crossings under the ESSL will also require settlement monitoring and depending on the construction activities and proximity to the ESSL, vibration monitoring-SWD reserves the right for further restrictions if construction activities threaten to cause settlement to the ESSL. 6. Please relocate the gate to the top of the hill shown on plan sheet C17. 7. There shall be no anchors for the inflatable dams within 10 feet of the edge of the pipeline or casing to the ESSL. The installation of the inflatable dam and any anchors shall require a submittal for SWD's review. The submittal shall require the seal of a registered professional engineer in Washington. 8. No equipment for construction, excavation, restoration, etc. shall be placed within 10-feet of the ESSL in performing these tasks so as not to load or disturb the pipeline. 9. SWD will determine the depth of cover over the ESSL at the top of the hill (if other locations are needed, please notify SWD). 10. SWD will have it's construction inspector on site to monitor activities for the diversion and pipe crossings. Also, SWD's inspector will make periodic site visits when construction activities are not affecting the ESSL for compliance with ROW permit requirements. 11. Prior to construction occurring requiring use of the ROW, notify SWD 2 weeks in advance. Contact Joe Mickelson - Lake Youngs/Transmissions at 255-2242 and Wes Edens at 684- 5933. 12. On all submittal reviews, allow at least two weeks for SWD review. Seattle Water Department Robert P. Groncznack, Superintendent Norman B. Rice, Mayor DT g��� AUG 3-1994 August 2, 1994 Mr. Abdoul Gafour-Utility Systems City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 CITY OF RENTON Engineering Dept. Subject: Proposed Renton Maplewood Transmission Water Main within SWD Eastside Supply Line Right -of -Way Preliminary Plan Review Comments Dear Mr. Gafour: 0 We received your letter dated June 29th regarding a permit request for construction of your proposed 16" Maplewood Transmission Water Main within the SWD Eastside Supply Line (ESSL) Right -of -Way at the ESSL crossing of the Cedar River. As you know, even though your water main is proposed to be installed in conjunction with the Metro Cascade Syphon Replacement Project, a separate permit to the City of Renton is required for any proposed use of our Right of Way. SWD's general plan review comments and permit conditions are as follows: 1. Clearly label our ESSL Right of Way as "Seattle Water Department ESSL Right of Way". 2. Identify all existing and proposed water facilities by owner e.g. SWD or City of Renton, and show all proposed water facilities by the City of Renton. 3. The permitted width shall be 10 feet rather than the 15 feet shown on your plans. 4. Install 62 feet of steel casing for support of your 16" restrained joint water main at Station 4+ 18.18 (between the two bends where your pipe will cross SWD's future pipeline location ). This casing is required because of the adjacent steep slope , relatively deep excavation adjacent to the pipebridge pier, and to reduce future costs of supporting your water main. 5. SWD Permit conditions will include restrictions against storage of heavy materials or equipment over SWD's ESSL. In addition, any excavations which are below (none are currently proposed) the ESSL will require shoring and support of the ESSL to prevent any ground movement around our pipe. These measures need to be clearly spelled out in your specifications. Seattle Water Department —Dexter Horton Building, 10th Floor 710 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98104 Printed on Recycled Paper' Abdoul Gafour-City of Renton 08/02/94, pg 2 6. SWD Permit conditions will include a 10,000 pound per axle load restriction within 10 feet of the ESSL Centerline for all vehicles/equipment crossing the ESSL via the access roadway. This may limit heavy equipment/material loads or require a "bridge" over the ESSL(the contractor should submit a plan for this with SWD approval in addition to Metro's review and approval). 7. SWD agrees to locate the ESSL at the top of the hill (south side) for potholing by Metro to determine the depth of cover prior to any construction equipment crossing the pipeline. Call Sandy Gray -Pipeline Maintenance Crew Chief at 255-2242 for ESSL location at least four days in advance of any vehicular traffic across our ESSL. 8. There is an access problem to SWD's ESSL Right of Way because the gate is missing (near entrance to Royal Hills Apartments). Metro has agreed to replace said gate so that public access is restricted. In addition, at the end of the Royal Hills Cul de Sac there is another point of access to SWD's Right -of -Way and we believe the City of Renton is researching the blocking that point of access by installing a guard rail system, etc. 9. SWD needs to review and comment on your specifications prior to permit issuance. In addition to including the SWD permit in the appendix, the specifications themselves need to make reference to our advance notification needs and key constraints e.g. #5 above. 10. We understand that your future pipeline route is up the hill and parallel to our ESSL Right -of -Way, and we are requesting a geotechnical report on slope stability and soil movement for your trenching near our pipeline and Right -of -Way. If you have any questions or would like to discuss SWD's comments, please call me at 684- 5977. incerely, CHARLES MADDEN, P.E. Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Services cc: Ronald Olsen -City of Renton J. Herold, SWD D. Olson, SWD N. Davidson, SWD G. Schneider, SWD S. Gordon, SWD, R. Simms, SWD D. Kruger, SWD S.. Gray, SWD D. Garrison, SWD R. Browne -METRO 1. !� ENGINEERS -' PLANNERS SCIENTISTS February 12, 1996 Ms. Lys Hornsby and Mr. Abdoul Gafour City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Cedar River Utility Crossing Project Estimated Costs to Include SWD in The Utility Crossing Project Dear Lys and Abdoul: As we discussed last week, I have estimated the design, permitting and construction costs necessary, to add a 72" empty casing to the current utility crossing project. The addition of a large casing pipe for the Seattle Water Department (SWD) includes significant problems; 1) it changes the method that must be used to divert the river, 2) it increases the trench depth due to flotation and the need to armor the pipe, and 3) it presents property ownership and/or pipe alignment problems. I have included the resolution of these issues in the cost estimate which is attached for your reference. I have sent a copy of this letter and the attached cost estimate to Stan Hummel at WPCD (METRO) and Bob Schwartz at the Seattle Water Department. Please let me know if we need to include SWD in the design by February 28, 1996 so that we can stay on schedule. The casing will be included in the applicable permit submittals which will be ready on Wednesday, February 15, 1996. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, RH2 ERIN Daniel R. Ervin, P.E. Encl. RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S. 924 Capitol Way South Suite 102 Olympia, WA 98501 (360) 705-0628 FAX (360) 943-0743 1-800-722-8052 RH2 ENGINEERING, P.S. 8383 158th Avenue N.E. Suite 200 Opportunity Building Redmond, WA 98052 (206) 869-1488 • (206) 453-0241 FAX (206) 869-7769 1-800-720-8052 RenV95.0201ysHornsb 1Abdoul Gafourlmdoc RH2 COLUMBIA ENGINEERING 139 S. Worthen Suite A Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509) 663-0150 FAX (509) 663-7975 1-800-721-8052 CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING ESTIMATED COSTS TO ADD A SWD PIPELINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CURRENT RENTONIWPCD PROJECT n Number Casing Size guous With Other Pipes fisting SWD ROW OPTION I 48" Yes No OPTION 2 72" Yes No OPTION 3 48" Yes Yes OPTION 4 OPTION 5 72" 48" Yes No Yes Yes ata Share of Previous Costs ng and Crossing Design cipated Permit Acquisition erty Acquisition Imon Construction Cost to Reroute Other Pipes for Second Diversion trials Illation action & P.M. oration $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $27,000 $27,000 $45,000 $45,000 $27,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $8,000 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $145,000 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $23,000 $34,000 $23,000 $34,000 $23,000 S44,000 $65,000 $44,000 $65,000 $44,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 otal w/o Tax or ContiRencv $317.0001 $349.0001 $472.0001 S504.000 %534-(M PTION 6 Notes 72" No Yes $14,000 33% of RH2 costs to date $27,000 Expected RH2 costs to add SWD casing to existing design $26,000 33% of expected RH2 costs to acquire permits $0 Cost to process new easement $50,000 Bonding, mobilization, insurance, etc. $0 SWD mandated move to eastern alignment $225,000 Second River dam and transfer piping $34,000 Caring and installation materials $65,000 Labor and machinery for casing installation $17,000 inspection and project management $108,000 River and bank restoration J:IDATAIREN1195.0201SWdcoste timatesxts, 2112196, 7,17AM CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING ESTIMATED COSTS TO ADD A SWD PIPELINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CURRENT RENTON(WPCD PROJECT OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4 OPTION 5 OPTION 6 Notes Option Number OPTION 1 SIVD Casing Size 48" 72" 48" 72" 48" 72" Contiguous With Other Pipes Yes Yes Yes Yes NO NO In Existing SWD ROW No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Prorata Share of Previous Costs $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 339 ofRH2 costs to date Casing and Crossing Design $27,000 $27,000 $45,000 $45,000 $27,000 $27,000 Expected RH2 costs to add SWD casing to existing design Anticipated Permit Acquisition $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 33% of expected RH2 costs to acquire permits Property Acquisition $8,000 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cost to process new easement «` Common Construction Cost $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Bonding, mobilization, insurance, etc. z Cost to Reroute Other Pipes $0 $0 $145,000 $145,000 $0 $0 SWD mandated move to eastern alignment Cost for Second Diversion $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $225,000 Second River dam and transfer piping Materials $23,000 $34,000 $23,000 $34,000 $23,000 $34,000 Casing and installation materials Installation $44,000 $65,000 $44,000 $65,000 $44,000 $65,000 Labor and machinery for casing installation Inspection & P.M. $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 Inspection and project management Restoration $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 River and bank restoration Subtotal w/o Tax or Contigency 1 $317,0001 $349,0001 ..:::::... . < . . $472,0001 $504,0001 $534,0001 $566 000 -; IX J.,VATAIREM105.0201SWdw testimetes ls, 211296, T17AM CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING ESTIMATED COSTS TO ADD A SWD PIPELINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CURRENT RENTON/WPCD PROJECT w/o Tax or 48" Yes No $14,000 $27,000 $26,000 $8,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $23,000 $44,000 $17,000 $108,000 ..................... $317,000 VON 2 72" Yes No ................... $14,000 $27,000 TION 3 OPTION 4 OPTIONS OPTION 6 48" 72" 48" 72" Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes $14,0001 $14,0001 . ::; ... $14,000 $14,000 $45,0001 $45.0001 $27,0001 $27.000 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $56 $0 $145,000 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $225 $34,000 $23,000 $34,000 $23,000 $34 $65,000 $44,000 $65,000 $44,000 $65 $17,0001 $17,000 $17,0001 $17,000 $17 $108,0001 $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 $108 $349,0001 $472,0001 $504.0001 $534.000 $566 of RH2 costs to date cted RH2 costs to add SIYD casing to existing design of expected RH2 costs to acquire permits to process new easement !ing, mobilization, insurance, etc. mandated move to eastern alignment nd River dam and transfer piping 1g and installation materials rand machinery for casing installation rction and project management and batik restoration J.'VATAIREM1850201SWd cost aetimatasxts, 2112,96, 7.:17AM CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING ESTIMATED COSTS TO ADD A S WD PIPELINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CURRENT RENTONIWPCD PROJECT n Number Casing Size guous With Other Pipes sting SWD ROW <. tta Share of Previous Costs tg and Crossing Design ;ipated Permit Acquisition erty Acquisition coon Construction Cost to Reroute Other Pipes for Second Diversion & P.M. OPTION I OPTION 2 OPTION 3 OPTION 4 OPTION 5 48" 72" 48" 72" 48" Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes $1 $27,000 $8,000 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $145,000 $145,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $23,000 $34,000 $23,000 $34,000 $23,000 $44,000 $65,000 $44,000 $65,000 $44,000 $17,0001 $17,0001 $17,000 $17,0001 $17,000 OPTION 6 Notes 72„ No Yes $14,000 33 ➢ of RH2 costs to date $27,000 Expected RH2 costs to add SWD casing to existing design $26,000 33'% of expected RH2 costs to acquire permits $0 Cost to process new easement $50,000 Bonding, mobilization, insurance, etc. $0 SWD mandated move to eastern alignment $225,000 Second River dam and transfer piping $34,000 Casing and installation materials $65,000 Labor and machinery for casing installation $17,000 Inspection and project management $108,000 River and bank restoration Subtotal w/o Tax or ContiQency I $317,0001 $349,0001 $472,0001 $504.0001 $534.0001 $566.0001'. J.,DATAIREM19&a2a1SWdc tesllmatesxls, 2112196, 7,17AM CITY OF RENTON & METROO (K.C.W.P.C.10) MEETING AGENDA for February 7`h, 1996, 3:00pm INTRODUCTION • City Staff • Renton Staff • SWD Staff • RH2 Engineering Staff PROJECT BACKGROUND • History • Current Administrative Status • Hydraulic Alternatives (Figures) • Regulatory Status • Status of Pre -Design and Design OPPORTUNITIES FOR PARTICIPATION • S WD Needs and Schedule? • SEPA Permit Only • Construct SWD Pipeline With Renton & METRO Project • Construct Separately but Concurrent • Do Not Participate Now DECISIONS NEEDED Prior TO FEBRUARY 28th • S WD Participation • Cost Sharing • Permit Responsibility • Design Responsibility Sy%7401 I Mike, ( lQJO,- (vcv, big) . rytw C� �� i WCSL - l�tt;��rY-aA i-h*usv bcr►"'�►�,. 5&�L9C _ S41� 1 btu ty ° " • ( $i ck Oae . 1 �ta� �16�yr ) A r, / W., yF CCAh itfor?rgJG sw-o A6r ► L, doc.,w,OKA -- ,� fz4 . u °I G . / Deal G ir-c ( . � fx rho G`c►,, . ',� S chwca� - / gCbPgl7u " l A-$ S U S LAJV� Jr—At��iWCb� uQy o ca L.U, qa r 4iw St,m ho, c 25 f. " ti 30 �-ew� ha�t�a. �la►� . Stub; Y, 493 t -0 • � CA�l .Rh-q �, n d-ro Arve"— Q-ram � G� t sw)p —� e#v VA �reQas� cod'- hli*� � Ste, RH2 ENGINEERING TEL No.206-869-7769 Feb 12,96 10:46 No.005 P.01 T-/oz-96 RH2 ENGINEERING, INC. 8383 158th Ave. NE • Suite 200 Opportunity Building • Redmond, WA 98052 (206) 869-1488 • (206) 453-0241 • FAX (206) 869-7769 FAX COVER LETTER Date: February 12, 1996 Please transmit the accompanying page(s) to: Name: Lys Hornsby and Abdoul Gafour Fax Number: 235-254\1 Follow up number 277-5539 From: Dan Erin Total number of pages transmitted, including cover: 6 If you do not receive all pages, please call us Immediately Our File No.: 185\ 202. Comments: Hard Copy to Follow Ren11194.04911garden RH2 ENGINEERING TEL No.206-869-7769 Feb 12,96 10:46 No.005 P.02 ENGINEERS PLANNERS SCIENTISTS February 12, 1996 Ms. Lys Hornsby and Mr. Abdoul Gafour City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Cedar River Utility Crossing Project Estimated Costs to Include S1WD in The Utility Crossing Project Dear Lys and Abdoul: As we discussed last week, I have estimated the design, permitting and construction costs necessary to add a 72" empty casing to the current utility crossing project. The addition of a large casing pipe for the Seattle Water Department (SWD) includes significant problems; 1) it changes the method that must be used to divert the river, 2) it increases the trench depth due to flotation and the need to armor the pipe, and 3) it presents property ownership and/or pipe alignment problems. I have included the resolution of these issues in the cost estimate which is attached for your reference. I have sent a copy of this letter and the attached cost estimate to Stan Hummel at WPCD (METRO) and Bob Schwartz at the Seattle Water Department. Please let me know if we need to include SWD in the design by February 28, 1996 so that we can stay on schedule. The casing will be included in the applicable permit submittals which will be ready on Wednesday, February 15, 1996. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, RH2 ERIN Daniel R. Ervin, P.E. Encl. RH2 ENGMEERING, P.S 924 Capitol Way South Suite 10Z 01ylnpia, WA 91S01 (360)70S-0628 FAX (360) 944.0743 RH2 ENGINEERING, RS. 8383 158th Avenue N,F, Suitc 200 Opportunht Building Redmvnd, WA 98052 (206) 869-1488 • (206) 4S3.0241 1`AX (2k)6) 869-7769 Re►N95.o2o, ,pHorntby/Abdo! Gafaur(lr.dot RH2 COLUMBIA ENGINEERING 139 S. Worthen SUN, A Wenatchee. 'AA 98801 (509)663-0150 FAX (509) 663.7975 :<4i .cae .'-. `b?o :. ad;Ky�`.''£4_ z:,'.a'. ""'k;>i�'i,,•^� _ -',l .a''-". CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING _ ESTIMATED COSTS TO ADD A SWD PIPELINE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A CURRENT RENTON/WPCD PROJECT ru.4 F v Y �"< .eidr:-;,yF-'•r'^a"3 iO,rF _ v Option Nmaber OPTION I OPTION 2 OPTION ! OPTION 4 OPTIONS OPTION 6 Now swD Cd" sj;e 48 n- 48" 72" W 72' ealvyelwcr Wq! OrArr Pipe,, Yes Yu Yee Yes No No I. - swD Row No No Yes Yes Yet Yes PrntawShareofPreviousCm I $14.000 $14.0001 $14,000 $14,000 S14,000 S14.000lJ56cfRMemvtodate Using -d Crossing Design $27,000 $27.000 $45.000 S45,000 S27.000 S27,o00 wed mn can, to add swD cwmg to edjsing dr+rgn Anticipated Pemoit Acquisition 3f% of ripened Am ca+w to a qwm prrmir+ _ $26.000 $26.000 $26.000 S26.000 S26.o00 S26.o00 .S8,000 53.000 so $0 $0 PnupWy Ali*. can to prom" prom" mw em mr COMMM CO3ShVCti00 COM S50,o00 S50.000 $50.000 S50,000 MOOD MOOD S50,o00 Bm &m& moNuzavom wwwwe, ere = Cost to Reroute Other Pipe PM ftoWmed now to raawnr diruftw SO So S145.000 $145,000 $0 $0 Cost for Seoond Diversion seeoad Raw. dam ®Id mm rr pi ov SO SO $0 $0 $225,000 $223,OOo Me1$ials $23.000 $34.000 $23,000 S34,0o0 S23,000 S34.000 CoM and .9.0 . n Xmah 1nVAH9600 Igor aged madWmrr far mrdeg iwfaUi n S44,000 W.000 $44.000 S65.000 S44,000 S65,00o Inspection do P.&1. hLwdim 4md prgkd mmngemrm $17,000 S 17.000 $17,000 S 17.000 S 17,000 S 17,000 $108.000 S 108.000 SIOUDDI $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 ReMccaum R;wr andba nt renonsfon M MR- h SubotslW/o TartOrCoati $317.000 $349,000 S472,000 $504,000 $534,000 SS66o00 r i All WIN I UT -� n✓v r ,r - ✓'� {ri•�`Raiff - ��...�,�. _. xst0 . a3- �. �+ ./-�.�;�}ia✓+a �.� i .A` ?ix �a lv �' .4FS`�?�n' `L Q G q :"Va'�'c'�'k" _ '�4V _ - K" _c _ yy7.ay` Of x. as vi� •°}" -� L ',� Y q k .. 30`.•� - r '' w x y.,. 'Lfi,^^ ,:zc a�`+.fisc'S""— ''.'*.� ' � :a"�: '%z°��e �' e • �^ 4Y'"'�3a Ir�..r� .. z .�."a z^F���"-�e _ .C: i � ^s ., 'Sa id � vaik e. �. -"- ,F `' � �:.- :i:'i: r`. �:'#ix- -_ _<-' y- <G'k .• . `d yr. a e'CAr ly : ba/ 9? x1� RkJF''_v ,"e4.'.3c.�Js t?_/ a 'y0.a. iC»..°. t; :., ..y: 'gY F �a,- `FC',k`:,i�`�i��3.i �t-•'.^S,'�.� .i?_."\:'`n_ eA.^i Y• "`':,�4` ,._2 b.„_:'xL` „... hyt� -_ T A %o. `'.k), Nby"^`.y ,S,y '`Sam:'`l� `k1.`r�§.'�.:�"s.' �L k�,a "`a'wy''y9 ;: . ,-i.1.zt' -".=e__--x:- �: e-_`'^3'�£� .'?' %�✓. .:y.E%r�.- ...:I-s``�ujxA',YY^;L..0`'F#,a�y3 .°`..��v'�'a"x+ata',}�a:-/.��-'�s 6.yts`�r'.�yL.2am¢,h_,R.: rx•La;: L.,7g;.t1arid::v� M�`,'' .rhYr,.yTwk'�`..'�cY�S _ _' '5 �j,"Ss^a.i:4+<n.�z,� UUa�8Oi8�?,a,'<�. q.:c,ri. c� <.�5: �`'�drY:� ;.:�. yrsy,,. '^` ,iir;Y:. l'4�3sv^�'`.�."\:Fr.,4xw`':�:a'i.,,3'.$.: i'�y�G';,_:.�YS,,,�',.'.,,"NFS� MIMEWIN. - -:_zA' __�£.:',.4;-:.:-u..'r:G:`.S,[dy��,�I3,oY.i;At M� e c x� a3;��3�''�,^ �'„H�,.,�:' --� = �.y:_S" �sL'R° ��,�"r<�r� ss '�' x ,:: .-a. s_ `.'v"Rc� �.• : z',�J��. �. -fir, s'ro�`as=,� _ ^��'.4a .oa L `�`a��✓'�;, :z -:.� :' :. .ate � .'�'v �@" �EnhF.Atl��:ik.+:�`:�^\ _'y'."��S(t `� �-. ::n__...:'. _ : :: .<�L.:.yi .i I3�::"`?:.:.. ^.2'_!'' .;>%w,,:�.ys<<,. w .>?";ys7ri�?;`v'Ss;� :"' k:�: ,-.6: '•�_... a 3::. - e''t.: m z H z m m 70 H z rD Q" W F — Q z 0 C) C) crl J.1D+t�AY1BA1PS�0�67W aoMmOtia+b. D'fM Pf?AM r�a�r�wew+asava�woos.�s�re�.,d� r*ese r.,rw 7v N m z H z m m 7U h-1 z G) ---i m r z 0 N O Ql OD m l0 ti G) lD CD 0- N lD dl O A z 0 O O Ul O Ul 70 N 1.�TAWBht•SOP�1►Ocar..MeeraA�, a MM J'I?AK --A m r z 0 N O co lD ti lD m Co Q r-- N l0 G) r— O J� 61 z 0 O O Ul • • `' Earl Clymer, Mayor June 9, 1994 Ms. Donna Kruger Seattle Water Department Dexter Horton Building. - 11 th Floor 71,0 - 2nd Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman PX., Administrator SUBJECT: PERMIT REQUEST FOR CITY OF RENTON MAPLEWOOD TRANSMISSION WATER MAIN WITHIN MERCER ISLAND PIPE R/O/W Dear Ms. Kruger: The City of Renton' would like to request permission from the Seattle Water Department to install approximately 300 feet of 16-inch ductile iron water line within a portion of the City of Seattle's Mercer Island Pipe Line right-of-waylying across and south of the Cedar River. Two sets of the civil plans for -the proposed water line are attached for your review. The City's water main will be constructed across the Cedar River in a utility bridge to be installed by Metro in conjunction with their Cascade Siphon Replacement project. We are currently working with Metro and WSDOT to have the water line constructed at the same time as Metro's Cascade Siphon project. We have been informed by Metro that Seattle Water Department has.granted them permission to construct their facilities within the Mercer Island Pipe Line- right-of-way and we hope that you will permit us to install our water line within the same right-of-way.. Please contact. Abdoul Gafour at 277-6210. if you have any questions or need additional information on this matter. Thank you for your help in this project. Ph�cerely, OL 'Ronald L. Olsen Utility Systems Director H:WATER:94-094AG Enclosure: Transmission Pipeline Civil Plans CC: Mr. Dave Della, RH2 Engineering, P.S. Mr. Roger Brown, Metro . �1 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 TIIIS PA PrR rf-)J Awe <nm_ ocr ...-. n...;........... ..:... _..-- --.._. _ .._.. Jesse Tanner, Mayor September 11, 1996 Mr. Stan Hummel King County Department of Natural Resources Water pollution Control Division 821 Second Avenue M/S 107 Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Cedar River Utility. Crossing CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Gregg Zimmerman P.E., Administrator Dear Stan: Enclosed are two signed. originals of the Utilities Cooperation Agreement for the construction contract of the Cedar River Utility Crossing. Please send one original back to me after execution by King County. Please call meat 277-6210 if you have any questions on this matter. Thank you.. Sincerely, Abdoul Gafour Water Utility Engineer H: W TR/59oZONE1METRO/9 5-011 AG:lf Enclosures cc: Lys Hornsby 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 1996 TO: Brenda Fritsvold - Deputy City Clerk FROM: Abdoul Gafour (ext. 6210) adou1� SUBJECT: Utilities Cooperation Agreement with King County for Construction of cedar River Utilities Crossing Attached are two originals of the above agreement to be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk. A copy of the resolution and of the approval by the City Attorney is also attached. I have received the approval from Jay Covington's office to put this item of Council's agenda of September 9, 1996. Please return both signed originals to me for King County's signatures. I will send one original back to you for your records after King County signs it. Thank you. cc: Jay Covington - Mayor's Office M590zone\96-057AG PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ROAD I r l r Ir/•/'rljr ✓ r t • ' PROPOSED SWING GATE AND BOLLARDS D I I i i t • — - i / I , r I f ; \` i D , I , — - i JJJ � 1 , f Iq 6 ' a• j .•,1 I I � t 1 { I r - I y1 f y I f 1 i / / 1 ✓ i ..r''('l' 1 ter•' I _, _ � -r- I � I � •i f / ..ram i � -� '\ , i I �` � ./ i•�•a� - _. - 1 I I, r'• � i f f � � r- _�� ! .I- 1 1 I 1 I ,•l , 1 \ I, SINS PIPE OSSING CR e r I r, ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ' ' 1� I �,II II I � � i D '�' ,•, `,,1 •'`I �, '11''''111111 i ,111111 � � •.,`y q II i •,I }.� i 1 1 D /r I^ �/ GSITE PLANENERAL NOTES: ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS: -- — --- - RL�IURE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITION. MAINTAIN VEHICULAR ACCESS AT ALL TIMES TO THE SEATTLE WATER DEPT. (SWD) PIPELINE VIA THE DIRT ROAD. PROJECT SITE ACCESS: THE PROJECT SITE MAY BE ACCESSED VIA ROYAL HILLS DRIVE. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ROAD: CONTRACTOR MAY CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY ROAD FROM THE END OF ROYAL HILLS DRIVE TO THE DIRT ACCESS ROAD TO THE NORTH. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN AND MAINTAIN THE ACCESS ROAD AS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE TEMPORARY ROAD SHALL BE LIMITED TO 12' IN WIDTH AND MAY BE PAVED. FILL MATERIAL MAY BE USED, BUT SHALL BE PLACED TO MINIMIZE CLEARING. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO SELECT AN ALIGNMENT THROUGH THE BRUSH THAT DOES NOT DISTURB ANY TREES WITH A TRUNK DIAMETER LARGER THAN 6". PROVIDE A TRUCK WASH DOWN AREA. ALL VEHICLES SHALL BE FREE OF LOOSED DIRT AND MUD BEFORE ENTERING ROYAL HILLS DR. PROTECT THE CITY'S ROAD SURFACE AND CURB FROM VEHICULAR DAMAGE. THE TEMPORARY ACCESS ROAD SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. SWD PIPE CROSSING CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A PLAN TO THE CITY TO PROTECT THE E.S.S.L. OWNED BY THE SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT (SWD) FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO USING THE ACCESS ROAD FOR PROJECT ACCESS. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT FROM SWD THE CITY SHALL OBTAIN THE PERMIT TO USE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FROM THE SWD. DO NOT DISTURB THE EXISTING 36" DIA. SEATTLE WATER DEPT. PIPELINE IN ANY MANNER DO NOT PLACE HEAVY MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, OR STOCKPILE EXCAVATED MATERIAL WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE 36" PIPELINE. PROVIDE AN ARMORED PIPE CROSSING FOR CONSTRUCTION ACCESS OVER EXISTING SWD & WPCD PIPELINES. LIMIT PIPE CROSSINGS TO TWO, ONE EACH AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF HILL. LOCATION AND CONFIGURATION TO BE DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR BASED ON EQUIPMENT AND SITE ACCESS NEEDS. VEHICLE LOADS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 10,000 POUNDS PER AXLE AND VIBRATION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT EXCEED 1/2" PER SECOND PARTICLE VELOCITY WITHIN 10' OF SEATTLE WATER DEPT.'S 36-INCH WATER MAIN. THE CONTRACTOR MAY TEMPORARILY PAVE SOME OR ALL OF THE STEEP PORTIONS OF THE ACCESS ROAD WITHIN THE ESSL RIGHT OF WAY TO STABILIZE THE SLOPE AND PROVIDE ACCESS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. A PLAN DETAILING THE SCOPE OF THE TEMPORARY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR APPROVAL. 3/8" PLATE 7" O.D. 5" NOMINAL X.S. WT. (4.813" I.D.) 3'-0" 3/8" PLATE 7" 0. D. 4,75" I.D. EXISTING GRADE 2' ' 0" 4" NOMINAL STD. WT. (4.5" O.D.) 12'-0" CLEAR 3" NOMINAL STD. WT. ELEVATION U 1 I 3-1/2" X 3/8" C_ C) PLATE LOCK TAB. 3-1/2" DIA. END, ' WITH 2-1/2" DIA. HOLE FOR PADLOCK. GATE TO SWING ()PFN TO 90 DEGREES 3/8" PLATE O.D. TO MATCH PIPE O.D. LOCK COVER: 12" NOMINAL SLOT LOCK COVER STD. W1 TO RECEIVE LOCK TAB OF SWING GATE 4" Hi 1Q11, ASPHALT PAVEMENT L= DIRT ROAD RIVER X—x EXISTING FENCE SWING GATE AND BOLLARD NOTES: 1. ALL PIPE TO BE ASTM A53, GRADE B, TYPE E OR S. 2. ALL PIPE TO BE HOT -DIP GALVANIZED AFTER COMPLETING ALL SHOP WELDS. 3. ANY AREAS WHICH ARE TO BE FIELD WELDED MUST BE TREATED WITH COLD GALVANIZING. 4, ALL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE WITH CONTINUOUS 1/8" FILLET WELDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. ALL SWING GATE POSTS AND BOLLARDS SHALL BE 4" NOMINAL STD. WT. PIPE FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND SHALL BE EMBEDDED 2' MINIMUM IN CONCRETE FOUNDATION. CONCRETE FOUNDATION AT EACH POST OR BOLLARD SHALL BE 12" DIAMETER AND 36" DEEP, MINIMUM, INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL. BOLLARDS AND POSTS SHALL EXTEND 3' ABOVE ADJACENT GRADE. 6. PROVIDE 3 BOLLARDS AT 4' O.C. EACH SIDE OF GATE POSTS. LOCATE SWD MAIN PRIOR TO PLACING BOLLARDS. ADJUST BOLLARD LOCATIONS AS NECESSARY SO AS NOT TO DISTURB SWD WATER MAIN. 7 PROVIDE ONE BOLLARD WITH LOCK TAB TO MEET END OF SWING GATE WHEN GATE IS IN OPEN POSITION (90 DEGREES FROM CLOSED POSITION). LEGEND WAw2"215 ss - SANITARY SEWER - — - - - - - SWD ESSL RIGHT OF WAY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS ROAD STORM SEWER - — PROPERTY LINE ­­'z SWD ARMORED CROSSING lei - - - - - TELEPHONE — RIGHT OF WAY LIMIT ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS TELEVISION - - --- RIGHT OF WAY CENTER w WATER — STATION BASELINE ABANDONED WATER EXISTING 2' CONTOUR P POWER EXISTING 10' CONTOUR SEWER MANHOLE Q- LIGHT POLE CATCH BASIN ENGINEERS PLANNERS �]n'SCIENTISTS S Y+' of WAS,"I 7� V � REDMOND WENATCHEE (206) 869-1488 (509) 663-0150 16727 800 720-8052 800) 721-8052 ' Fa1sTT46°l SIGNED. TONAL � i)RAWIN(, IS NOT TO SCALE 05/16/96 IF BAR IS NOT 2" LONG EXPIRES a/2/ss 0 1 2 RENTON / KCWPCD CEDAR RIVER UTILITY CROSSING WrR-2?-22 L SWING GATE DETAIL SITE ACCESS and SECURITY GATE SCHEDULEB JOB NO FILE ENGINEER REVIEWED DAlt SCALE PLOT DWG NO, 195.020 CRUX-27 TVP DRE JUL 01, 1996 SHOWN 40 C17 5 of 13