The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWWP273473 (8),yam._ r y 3 d'• 4 {�►�.,enton SUM merwiri/Stonr ` Lift Stall So -lid -A., r.atidii -an-Fie"Id. wen e I aV'rn di Stone got 2007 >R , ' Lara Kammereck, ePE+4 hl, PE Scott Goss " Jeff_ ; P a , Y i Erik Waligors E,h ... . d'RothHi �1� 8 ■ Key Personnel Skills and Abilities ■ Qualifications and Expertise ■ Project Approach -- Permitting/Funding/Public Outreach -- Conveyance -- Lift Station Design -- Facility Support ■ Project Management ■ Resource Availability ■ Questions and Answers ■ Why Select the Roth Hill Team RENTON Dave Christensen Wastewater Utility Engineering City of Renton RH = Roth Hill Engineering ROthNIII KfJ=KennedylJenks HWA = HWA GeoSciences Our Core Team Lara Kammereck, PE - RH OC = Omega Contractors Project Manager ■ Over 100 years of QualityAssurancei J Principal -In -Charge Quality Control combined experience Tony Fisher, PE - RH Greg Hill, PE - RH ■ Specialized expertise in areas of responsibility Conveyance Manager I Lift Station Manager Permitting) ■ All located in Puget Sound ProjoetAssistanceManager area Erik Waligorski, PE - RH Erik Brodahl, PE - RH-1 Scott Goss - RH [Utility Survey Geotechnical Permitting ■ Extensive experience MikeLemasa,PLS -RH Erik Andersen, PE -HWA EileanDavis -RH workingtogether g Locates Electrical Public Outreach ProLocates Paul Reardon, PE - KIJ Pam Cobley - RH ■ Responsiveness Structural Funding Don Barran, PE - KIJ Scott Goss - RH Constructability Review Gordon Wagster - OC Additional Team Support Scott Slifer, PE - RH Jeremy DelMar. PE - RH Jeff Foray, PE - K/J Senior Project Engineer Project Engineer Senior Project Engineer Bradley Hughes, EIT - RH Terry VanWechel - RH Ron Bard, PE - K/J Project Engineer CADD Senior Project Engineer Jim Marshall - RH Construction Observer Our Bench Strength RothHIII ■ 35 years in business ■ 50 employees in Bellevue office ■ 2007 ACEC Gold Award for Lift Station 10B Kennedy Jenks Consultants Engineers i Scientists ■ 85 years in business ■ 60 employees in Federal Way office; 500 total ■ 2006 ACEC - Oregon Honor Award for Woodburn Water Storage and Treatment System U , HWA(A01,( II.N'( J1 INi ■ 25 years in business ■ 27 employees in Lynnwood U0, IIWAGEOSCIENCESINC. Eastside Interceptor, Section t Sunset Interceptor SW 34th Street Culvert Improvements SW 7th Street Storm Drain City of Renton Kennedy Jenks Consultants Enquieers Scientists Maplewood Treatment Plant Well 5A `th/H Roill V Sewer Model Heather Downs Central Plateau Interceptor Sunset Interceptor C C O N N C C p0U) N E c a m u m _� to d m N E y c ' w E E c w n n o ayi c Z. Q o 0 � i4 o m U vm > Q O Ta N >«- c > C y Q C t -6 C o E > Key Team Member o w a in ji ce c a c LT .o a Z U) c LO) '� LL o c0 c c°� a o ROTH HILL J J J J J J J J J J J J Lara Kammereck, PE J J J J J J J J J Scott Goss J J J J J J J J J J Erik Waligorski, PE J J J J J J J J J J Erik Brodahl, PE J J J J J J J J J Tony Fisher, PE J J J J J J J J J KENNEDYIJENKS J J J J J J J J HWA GEOSCIENCES J J J J J J J J I. Project Management Project initiation -o Project plan management Public outreach support Team kickoff meeting :• Team coordination e Project closure Confirm project goals and objectives :• Client communication Client confirmation II. Quality Assurance/Quality Control III. Pre -Design IV. Facility Design V. Construction PF A. Flow Analysis B. Facility Evaluation Siting and easements Design Construction sequencing C. Route Alternatives D. Funding Alternatives A. Topographic Survey B. Lift Station Hydraulics } Building type •: Site improvements •: Electrical/controls/telemetry •: Constructability review e Existing facility abandonment C. Conveyance System S• Alignment :• Utility locates •} Service continuity :• System standards D. Speciality Services Geotechnical C• Wetlands e Public outreach VI. Permitting A. Construction Assistance •: Construction staking •: Review of submittals :• RFI assistance •: Conflict resolution assistance •e Change order assistance •? Testing and startup assistance •: Construction communications B. Construction Record Drawings Regulatory Evaluation Permit Acquisition Regulatory Compliance -e Sensitive areas :• Permit timeline :• Permit coordination •:• Renton Right -of -Way Use Permit SEPA •e Final permit inspections :• Renton Grading Permit ee Renton Building Permit •: Department of Fish & Wildlife, HPA Deliverable: Pre -Design Report Deliverable: 60 % , 90%, and Final Draw- Deliverable: Construction Support in s Specifications, and Cost Pro ections Documentation Regulatory Evaluation Permit Acquisition Regulatory Compliance SEPA (WAC 197-11) Building Permit Drainage Issues Sensitive Areas ROW Permit - from City WDFW HPA -Larry Fisher 1111101110. Building Permit - from City BMPs Stream Crossing Permit Conditions (timing, restoration) ■ Planning Loans ■ Low -Interest Loans -- PWTF -- SRF ■ ULIDs - over 100 completed ■ Grants -- Local (CDBG) -- State (CCWF, State appropriations) -- Federal (STAG) We know the full range of funding r 0 .Q J C7 d' C o d n (� lL t m w A Q o J U_ d C� Client a v m > > ca 2a Cn N King County Water District No. 111 Southwest Suburban Sewer District City of Carnation King County Water District No. 90 Soos Creek Water & Sewer District Foothills Water Association Highland Water District �i J ■ Expectations ■ Open House Meeting ■ Mailer/Flyer ■ Construction Impacts -- Access -- Noise -- Dust ■ Restoration Olympus Terrace Big Gulch Sewer Project Open House Sewer District Seplember 9, 2004 Project Fact Sheet N.Jact Goal. Preliminary Schedule • Reduce PotenWl gpelmerugwe and lor raw uweye mrP Wy Gu1Ji end the I'll,I'll,,solund �lerlrlllws Plen .........1y99.2ro1 l e„wr .Iwrnwarer re�le<I e,�,�rl �Mw,: Inrynuw lrre wenll.......... lcwrtlrnorn romemus BulWmg...1g02 VrovuM re�reNbnel tanxnls Iwahlny UaBI (a clElzem W MuloRea Background ww•r old. e.am roo(lw,y.xlwn w.wurero,ewer � Maw ] • 3: plpeune In the twllwn W BIR (rvhn Env runnwrnsl r Orgrnally Wined i I f leer, yean or stwmwater esrnron Nevww ]aof - 2ms Mre eayose0 sntlals W gPeWw es well x nurnerdn rrvrJwks ErrlxgernyrePaksnave taken gxeorerthe wars. W Ve.w3i l: bur nownnnecesul ytoregx-e lots secUPn ul J-.tmf2B05 sewer gpNsne and Improve nwmwatel <aMlrlons Maw l: Project Elamont. • Imullarrewsewer fiyel... xl_h.g.,,awd,nkd Mw.: Lyyass Prye la reduceerosmnln the qulcM1 andcreek down cunlny PlFlWelxge se[Ilons WtM1e creek ro rrtRvrwe bsL anal ,.! ly Mryar yrpyE...... 1001 rnrwgn wsMllle Isadrar canstruc • (amnu.rarttreatemal well from rM wastewater lrealmenr Plan) xcns road ro IM1e lop W wwrn iwk • (oroaereln�rnerc a�,esi wine Lea.na Ina mourn W Rry WO Project Cost and Funding v,emm�wrv.o,tewmxe, bom in lu �oueon Costs well Lt st�rN Ixlween UKP-1 _ peon(•(, hPe�l ro rlrmler evaluallonsl o Olymprrt Twr...4wr tM.vl.t a .r M a i a PNmI.W rl P.I Contact Information Fol Inlrn n, Plee o .n P.t Sore nun. District Men.gu, dymp-T—... 5—rr Diatrio ERpuserl,ewer yllrrlinem Bly Gulch(August 20Da) (425) 353-ee00 1010 1100 0101 0110 0001 1000 1000 ME = mom 1100 0111 0100 0001 1000 00■ 1000 1000 ■ Three Potential Route Alternatives ■ Need to Maintain Operational Continuity ■ Construction Within Established Community ■ Potential Stream Crossing ■ Permitting - King County vs. Renton ■ Confirmation of Flows and Pipe SizE�s ■ Conduct Pre -Design: Alternatives Analysis -- Determine best route alternative -- Consider alternative construction methods -- Perform hydraulic analysis ■ Prepare Detailed Design -- Align pipe within selected route alternative -- Public outreach -- Detailed and concise contract documents Experience working in Established Communities -- Currently installing 60,000 linear feet of sewer in City of Carnation We know the City's Sewer System -- Roth Hill developed the City's sewer system model and will conduct the project hydraulic analysis We understand this project -- Roth Hill developed this project through Sunset Interceptor Analysis Issues Adequately sizing the station for future growth Accurately defining the contributing basin service area Solutions Determine peak build -out design flows using City's sewer model, developed by Roth Hill Size pumps and motors for projected flows Include provisions for future upgrades r M Issue Maintaining continuous sewer service during construction Solutions Construct new station, keeping old stations in service until new station is operational and accepted for use by City Site should allow adequate space for construction of new facilities adjacent to existing Re -channel existing wet wells for use as manholes and emergency storage after abandonment of existing stations w S'_ - "I - E' -E � T O i/v E G q 12' DIAMETER W WET WELL OVERFLOW Z I STANDBY W STORAGE GENERATOR > . ,., SET Q �Or r � VALVE CONTROL 00 VAULT DUILDING PROPOSEt--- FORCE M RANSFORMER *0 �- A, I ELECTRICAL -� -TRANSFORMER N.E. 26TH STREET WET WELL- \-VALVE VAULT - ----- ALT. #, ---- FORCE MAIN - - - ALT. #2 FOR IN ALT. #3 FORCE MAIN f EMMENAM Z� 1F Issue ■ Providing a lift station that is functional, reliable, convenient, and compatible with existing stations Solutions ■ Work closely with City M&O staff to incorporate features preferred by City ■ Ensure convenient access, adequate emergency storage, standby generator set, and sufficient available pumping range/depth ■ The design will feature: -- provisions for safe and convenient cleaning and maintenance, including an on -site water service -- landings/gratings for access in the wet well -- isolation valves -- intrinsic safety barriers -- appropriate lighting ■ Station will be made compatible with other City lift stations for consistency and familiarity for M&O Efficient study and sizing of station using in-house sewer model Local station expertise Appropriate detail and features Fresh set of ideas to the design process Creative problem -solving abilities Thorough design and quality review process -- In-house expertise for QA/QC review -- Constructability review by Roth Hill Construction Representative -- Third party review by Gordon Wagster of Omega Contractors Low change order percentage Protect E E ?�vC�,co n A w ' v` E a n— 3 c 3 8 L9i S to e 'a a 3 a III to Northshore Utility Diatrlct ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Lift Station 14 475 J J J J J J J J Soos Creek Water 3 Sewer District .................................................... Lift Stat100 108 ...... .......................................................................................................................... 10,000* J J J J J J J ....................................................................................................................... Lift Station 23D 520 J J J J J J J ....................................................................................................................................................................................... Lilt Station 36 ................................................................................................................................................................................................ W"1000' J J J J J J Lift Station 38 .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,800 J J J J J J J Lift Station 39 1,200 J J J J J ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... Lift Station 40 130 J J J J ................................................................................................................................................................................................. LHt Shtbn 42 140 J J J J J J ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... Lift Station 43 270/400' J J....... J...... J J J .............................................................. Lift Station 44 230 .... J J .............. J ..........,.,............................... J J ................................................................................................................................................................... Lift Station 45 240 J J J J .......... J ..... I .... J ......... . .......................................................................... Lift Station37 440 .. �.................................................,........................... .. Pump Station 2 (watery..............................5'0 .............J 00 ......................... .............. J.......J .......J ...........................J.... Maximum Capacity with Impeller Change M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ■ Architectural, Structural, Electrical, Instrumentation ■ Biggest Concern is Aesthetics -- Building needs to fit neighborhood -- Screen equipment as necessary -- Talk to building department, neighbors early ■ New Electrical Service and Standby Generator ■ Cast -in -Place Overflow Tank, CMU Building, Precast Wet Well Project Plan Compliance Leadership Client Communication Design Leads Utility System Focus QA/QC Sewer Expertise Roth Hill Team RENTON AHEAD OF THE Ct7RVF ----N RothHIII City of Renton City of Enumclaw Soos Creek Water &Sewer District City of Olympia Alderwood Water & Wastewater District City ofAuburn Foothills Water Association Experience City of Gig Harbor working together VV, HWAGEOSCIENCESINC. City oe a.nton M..th.rdowns Basin study Fr.l..t Budget A Schedule Status Engineers d Scientists 3]5.oa5.o0 113.5% •— . f]S Oaa oa A A M5% S1a aDa a0 Q 5% R/ ■ szsx i s�S Ciao oo usx ■ Sz sx sto aoo M -■ ri s% t Prq.ct.d Cumula4w S 1i.5% ss.000 00 ■ sp«n S • Earnsd Vatus $ I.S% WW ■ .15% Fst,o Ms,2 AV-Z M.y-10a3 JUF1oa6 JJ.]oa3 AW'2 5•p2 Oct-Io05 Wr]0a8 Oc.]aD6 GIH = M M � M i � �� ! = M M M == M M Schedule 2007 2008 Task 1st 2nd 3rd I 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Project Initiation -------------- ........................................................ ............... ....._.....-..._..... - ..................._ .._............... ......... — I....Project Management ................................................. .................... .............. .............. ............................................. II. QualityControl/Quality Assurance ............................................ ................................................................... .............. .............. .............. ............. ............. III. Pre -Design _....................................................-------..............------...........-----.....------........._............................................................... .......A. Flow Analysis ........................................ ............................................................................................................. B. Facility Evaluation ......................................................................... ................................................. C. Route Alternatives ................................. -- ..................... .... . ..... _... ............. ......................... .............. ............. ........ D. Funding Alternatives ................................................................................................................................................................. IV. Facility Design ................................................................................................................................... A. Topographic Survey .............................................. ...... B. Lift Station ..............__._................. .............. ------------- ........................................................................... C. Conveyance ................................................................................................................................................................................. D. Specialty Services ........................................................................................................................................ Geotechmcal _..........._....... _ .... ......................................................................................... Wetlands ................................................. ............. ............. .............. .............. ............. .............. .............. .............. Public Outreach V. Construction .................................. ............................ VI. Permitting Availability Current Availability Team Member Role Location 2007 2008 Lara Kammereck, PE Project Manager Bellevue 35% 40", Greg Hill, PE Principal -in -Charge i Bellevue 20% 20% Tony Fisher. PE Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Bellevue 2b% 30% Erik Waligorski, PE I Conveyance Manager Bellevue 30% 40% Erik Brodahl. PE Lift Station Manager Bellevue 35% 40% Scott Goss Permitting/Project Assistance Manager Bellevue 30% 30% Mike Lemasa, PLS Survey Bellevue 25% 1 25% Erik Andersen, PE Geotechnical Lynnwood 20% 25% Paul Reardon, PE Electrical Federal Way 25% 25% Don Barraza, SE Structural _ _ _ _ _ Federal Way 15% 25% Eilean Davis Permitting Bellevue 25% 1 25% Pam Cobley Public Outreach Bellevue 40% 60% Additional Roth Hill Support Scott Slifer, PE Senior Project Engineer Bellevue 35% 50% Bradley Hughes EIT Design Engineer Bellevue 40% 60% Jeremy DelMar, PE Project Engineer Bellevue 30% 50% Jeff Foray, PE Senior Project Engineer Bellevue 20% 31% Ron Bard, PE ! Senior Project Engineer Bellevue 20% 30% Jim Marshall Construction Observer Bellevue 40% 70% L Terry VanWechel CADD Bellevue 35% 35% ■ Key Personnel Skills and Abilities ■ Qualifications and Expertise ■ Project Approach -- Permitting/Funding/Public Outreach -- Conveyance -- Lift Station Design -- Facility Support ■ Project Management ■ Resource Availability Ift"Ruestions and Answers ■ Why Select the Roth Hill Team I♦ M mil♦ IIIIIIIIIIE I♦ M M M M = ■ Master Planning ■ Hydraulic Analysis ■ Integrated Design of the Lift Station and Conveyance Pipeing The Roth Hill Team RothHIII Kennedy Jenks Consultants Engineer So-wi. u,W, HWAUMAInuSIM ■ Sewer planning, analysis, design, and construction expertise ■ Master planning and pre -design evaluation expertise ■ Understanding of project context and complexities ■ Permitting, funding, and public outreach expertise ■ Client -focused project management ■ We will deliver! R EE N� Key Project Issues ■ Sensitive Area Analysis ■ Public Outreach ■ Maintaining Service Continuity Project Approach Project Management Quality Control/Quality Assurance Pre -Design ■ Flow analysis ■ Facility evaluation ■ Route alternatives ■ Funding alternatives Facility Design ■ Topographic survey ■ Lift station ■ Conveyance ■ Specialty services Geotechnical Wetlands Public outreach Construction Permitting ■ Permit Acquisition ■ Construction Assistance ■ Operational Considerations Benefits to the City From Selecting the Roth Hill Team ■ Responsiveness, care and collaboration ■ The job will be done correctly ■ Local knowledgellocal solution ■ Proper balance between up -front design and long-term operational considerations ■ Ability to shorten project schedule to maximum degree ■ Success during construction ■ Properly managed project -specific non -design challenges -.11,111rillillillillillillillilI lob. 7H a .4, N L V I I v i�V lftz, � PROPOSED - FORCE MAIN V OVERFLOW STORAGE VALVE VAULT ELECTRICAL CONOLS ------------- - - - - -- _ EXISTING FORC_ E MAIN _ N.E. 26TH STREET ALT. #2 FORCE MAIN (ED TRACT "H" OPEN SPACE 12' DIAMETER WET WELL -STANDBY GENERATOR SET F � '' _ ! L-J � _ J W U) W Z W Q� 001 Z� F-- 'CONTROL d' BUILDING r' -TRANSFORMER TRANSFORMER WET WELL \ �-VALVE VAULT ALT. #3 FORCE M IA N - - F (:257