Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA89-057
RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: DATE CIRCULATED: 6 1 89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/15/89 ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street_ SITE AREA _1. 58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4. Plants ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5:00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 _ rr 4WWI Wo��~ fir.... �a:'� •ice' I✓.es_ WWW�1 • 4 ,VI W Ili • e' / \I` J�`1 4 P•M Ir..,s.Iw .LlK' .a w+•r! 'C' . I!11rX/ /wJ.ml RaI1TM0 ORAL fnel roams MU& �+ • ,t 1, rr a.s Y �� r. i ® '�',. GTTIgL—g,.....n Two,,rw.lrm I • �J lb ./.• ,.. '4", Pr • els \ #** ( 1 , •-•-. ............—..—. / . ,..„,./r,,,.>. -▪ ------__.-2.--_.-...- •/ ,J'• T1/a r•}1,1WJ1fp at.aVYA.O00 P, ,..Aww(env WT!W�V.0.41......2 .0.4L wn x}�i I _ .ia1Wd I.M.4VAi1/D �E▪ .:1�° w�. �r /. � v�L.w.MV ..: JINN 8.t.UT• nllf,ii.Ivnuviwr�.. �K e.I.01.iw PrIMI"110 �r.��...� / ,•I I.o'9.WN1M 9fl1CJ4. ffaVO!&D/JIT.°JgL.IMJ AM Y .. =�r-"`�`y c�D LVYLIJ L.'Jf FL�A'J.fY�VIIID NJ NH l+rugY. �Y! f �.D 1w.J N✓f..L'Ai rye cru ,74.4(..'. I. /nr t� 'N .....��. X .aaaw.!r+n amnnnlml - ` ^� r / r•..n w.�w^ �' .• ..I........... ,/ r. t IMSIIIIITIIIIIrIi\ .../.,, !.r_u I�e>�fie� C.I. ,�I 1F!.'�....iww°wwii eVraW fi+ �rwl� 1.w�. w.S (I�1I euHwiw imioMn-i _ _ _ ••�•.•..�.w... .1t--r—m 1'1�,M.! .--_ .. ''.""'-.. '^...' :-.,1.1! r4r41.v ..- . .. 111,;7 rottnllR gAWRI!�`RP-'!!b_,gR.+,1Weleneinnuv�T •••:��_..._.....:.� . \` I \ ; ) ,..-.I / - k ` _-/ \ 1 . /: / , ,J. 1 2 — CID .a.,.,7TM.TwUT ®, • • a "n - - `A, .___ _ .41 I iM V 6; 4- w"rt ill4._0 it. owes. .��i�5•V}� .:t.e�1 , Mt Nne9 'o {Ln'!1T' I 1` G•. c, 1L [q 1 r 5% I.R1.CL;.oT 1A.IDKAPl,•GKUu.T100 • V-.17, •�••-• CD �.�J.nptwca F 4W oYa F�•34-' I .a.,.. .. d �Lr L- 4Y. .N P O A ,.o n F ,rry.n�i ,.an..asfd4 • r.D,e°O yR. IIF.IF.R/VAN DE VANTh y1. �'Sf'^ 4E➢OTc�c.R MW21l2,1 {"1'11(,WW I(FpD L/.Ub'lAf�C1 (:R(JU I'I% •Jl.i �}� Pou lPf. F.L 93,4N sL IT. i 4°• t,6/O imi,fr, Sae Ma1P15tnic. 1.iti.:1'r,C., pp�C ftWuS L!lu/oc Een UG'oTTD WY►EN' 11.10•8u ILT6 tl LpU054PVC Mel, Suite 2N - I- .�'1R--Ts.kE:.ic ..i.-N LL:K. �^eT'�y� Z,iO-L'�7FEN Nu�L ft+.NIDrD • P64o e.17. 612141hue NE i � �4Y1 CP LAWI.1 6Y F,CiALD I41cf4FPYa 1414ru..HA wet'M.°I(n)\. . rn 3u.nNE►,Ws e► (2116)45I.8)OI 0 n^m.Trllu eJ v RPfrN11D MrIl hnt. �.tN TeRo.1.4 if/.'Tm 1 gPL.w-.� Eu.v tiker •.1PcaJaL suwora r ri M aP1.y.Y, NEMIIMINI ...-.-r.a.l_�.uuakovl. a ,- `_...,_— q.r°1f '°"7 ra.FOe.r — i.°•l7 fFN.Jq fI 4 T „iv. �- --_L���f -.�-°RarP�N �LAADSCAPE PLAN '/ SOUND OLDS, GMC, PONTIAC _ L-I ppm SEcn4N . Renton,,WA Ntsi '. ^_ - •• i7+t.4r),• ,w r _ __ - _ - . . ., - .:^v'',u7:;r::=1lr.=%,'... .'.-.. , __•. i. ..._.5�. ._..-T:.a r••:a .g��. .. • �. ` tMF-:••t::_. . _.____.. ..{_ -� --. .. ,.,.Tyr ,,Ai;.••y.:. .- - .—. _......._. ,2?:: -� ,,.s/•+r.••. :�y,- ._•_ ,._ ._ .:r.i�• ••�.� Yk s a. • _ ,i . . : . �•• . •yf' • . . •:rz:� rye. r:nii4+rE4F:cf�=}rc:- •• •• . .... •: .r*� (Y''I �.a ..N.''- ///' 'f.��;)fy ti lMST:..4 /•' •Y.'hi'A'01•i..' •• S a 6eti :S .I'JT... ' ?'- ^l�Fu T:av rJ• :.iti C I i;uI I. t I felt_PATE o Llrfa.If'T e.•..t /. /� ''1r C4.-.•a r '1 7 './ +:a Ya• . i rod.t..tw. ••. a L 4..v.Nr.n ma....e.-hm V !";"1 ,'� _,t..:._ -" S d, i • I - 1 ed•r.11�t�am. . wir../....,.(,we..ar.r.pa!Cram) � _,�{:: • ..n_•,1 DHOW 1.. (ewe»tp1WA..• /• r • 1",f I' 76C/,•R t+ • j5p,�F .! ,! • I'i ...mat wry.her --.J f d"....`ar PLht.4 .., r 1 ' :t•••• ♦r:... was aTrtt.•a••Y e•.Yi.Yb7•(- . /.et : T • .....De - t. / r//' -. ...._.__--..-__..._--•. _„.• ----_-.-._-..._-., _,._ Ta''III' � � cl:aT:_e�+t l;, N,v 1 i ISF fAl • a..L:Jo.. _ •-I,one.,.. , • -1 0 -•I '.I ;;11.` l ' NY3-r�- \x" I j_ •..v..en•.]o •.; +• I .wl O.emt:a nI:st zo _ . _ e ........LL ^all. �, f~ - -- �—as - —7- -- -- —=I I 'i.. ..., • • a•` _. • �fy. Ilel tf' — // - -- l.a • elf. \ L' :rr use. 1 I I I .. S')' Q'\ I I _ �tE.ncv / .f / r p :� ft�:rel'N• ,: - 'el , _ l l.� J I _ /-, - nave. ..' .• err. -r • us. -t.- ,h �_ el t.\v • / Y J --_ -`�\yr M• - .n.0. \��` _ I I - ( •-.V. t' ./1:i+�- u wig• .L M1.+t . \�' _ \ .� --1l / ��� v_....._- .i: •I•. I T`E.L=JL,=•7. / I I . PaTt..,--ce. _ j •k Ir' nun.a. �fL --T`t3r- + •,l t i �J `' *--•--—I -`- t• d a:.,cat.: - yam ,,,y�1 t.. T]+ ' �r .l 1.'� 1 f' —.-- — K y M eNr.De�POND I - L nr...L..' \ ! ..^i 1 .5"MIPE..1I GB�),//kE.=-R.1`.'i2fZ-I!' ;/ 7}�. - P••]oo'. Mob. 7 K - e,.; i �.....I. nn..i .-- a.:.ce.E I 1 r. 1• �fil • I�r-- ( (d: to cGT}�iS I S I 1 t j .-�23• u ��i. w_ _ I`+M=.`a" F - �' f ly i1 `, a r .r.+wr ¢¢ c r'—I ___��AP -raw _..', A `---� I� S I£ ;-i f . • •/ AgiltF,,i 1 .\.. ;::: ..- .: ..'/3 fee '. • iA/ - ,0„ w�--.s• a: r.. ....- :u�.-- ._.•. --- _ r.;&&•rein • (_*.'i'o . hen `•.:i 6r�itar •.a_...l. emu• _ «„a.+�� set, �_ use.. ..• ------ 1= .-- Co- !----"' ._ .• •.a.,::Vl.gnN,. - - — • ^ni^ ............!•\ /• 11TrL: _ ---- _ - -- _ `{�{r 4�' 4 ]. All r..u▪uW....bur remotion/YtenJM fa4liti.• • r...U.NdaW't•..r.no prim ._.. T any•,{'54.., a • �`�:i{ : x to•nY paving ran l.a nu•rveaa•Rtove°.y q•rain of PWlle•arcs. - - _ -- .•i �—_,.-__._.- 1', r, � f.]/p.l. __. .. -QhuW. 1, leupcuu and p.r•l ea °..veiny Iratllti•.awl dln•e,Ut e..roue rm...__. __Jeso c n; .-C•a - ie Y:.: n.U•mt.,..yarem. .i nos-.�—. ---e•l •..nave. .•�-.1 • - .. ,.vl la -.I -•S I. onus.ay.tmer me m public rl.na-.Iv.Y nano h.v w.lq llY. .•• _� - _ ___ - - _ I .. ••• _ ,j • i • d. Trench b.car.11 mantas.shall E.coiner°..0.e.t.a Y..H. -" - -_ I r '1 1I- a. All.turf.•°.uzianee•hall...ad..too..her..fa.'Marie..rye eJa••1.....n.% a` , ' • e. _ 111•2 . J• —,. I• �jr•' J.^ [ aroa..control...urea ar•...I... - f'1. V'' -r)'•'. if k C • • •fire.le=7,t1 b.don•oat.u Approved type hydro-am/sr.or u• aria.approved q rye u •- ! - ~�`••I,y I� a4 {i Dee.et Puhlle You• •• ..a M• "..tiA"-4} ,l:.r„i"a _ . r',f•t.' ,. Cleve.°..horn hired:ere tuh a flu.•Ion... 1•...... 1.1.,• l • --- :Hw .Iw t 1.......shorn of existing uJ llalea an..a.0 only M It shell r.A:rele.Uility•f U. I6 ,i •. � ,• rr •„u _ ��.! - Eb • eonta....m arlly U• .met Ion Jan•o r to aexla race•.r ue...we. e,-1� 4 • 1�• . _- CpL r •..E 1 i b o t. r.ti.ryrnchaa..: JH.1 Aenton an crop of Inlet).coma.Ml.l..a•t'firea•uLler Ain.ail ! C..,u .. i ;. an a.,rat via..•1.+.]pis. - ______(__ __ 1! StnroMAT l.oalal./IYplrar.lATlap conyrDe PIM.'a,Ya - r;. - . I. rein .hula.tore,oat utiwn Ice slit control. .•• rt=—'�• Ci i ]. Tr.exyerary ex .se/e•dlrnaaJex ton vol fev111 tY•hr11 r vein .Ymer r 1.nalA•r �L - '-= �;,{ ` 1 d maarl yl•.• rNnm tlth ln•.pprortd reronr:s`u.yY..uJw rettr.l pion ,. < j `yS{ lacllltlu•...aa •0alaatoally• ealnael until the trrll•e.M l.J•••P&.1• ! L• mrirt.a u•p.exJel I.on......Ion hex be... 11 .7 1. Mason allutian control.r.aa to•rpirl V......i.l.a. ZD _"I" I : I. Provide ud W temporary ee°Irnuu.n collate..(sell&W r Isuw•tlW.a La.rotor 'riff!. y '••' n' • . ••. _ •••• L hem drelnr.t.yen, .M tilt=.a tr.l•yadY Y.lelea•a re dsrin/ serf! �•.. • .'.i/•. • rc`a• my rywol full as away ha unn u Loa red •p.. f.••ua11 •.a..or tpe.' •_ .• -a�aTC: 9(Li M ern.t.o tra.wive auoM�alm.`dlmn. .IUJu aim e.n111J...yar unbind m Loam. p1.�.uuel. p.e1.� a 1f.- Yf.KgJliae:TF�•-y IfTC.i.,h e• Tint 1 1 c s..n the prnpre.plea. Trea/en.Carl.the a.., •1 rein..It:hell the SKTIOLT Eb'•' - _ . .. ..!•TOTE:T:PI'+'i��� I•:T�5T1;;C. I.I..rJw W realorelhlJH•1 qt Ywl•.r •Yre•.u~M erdlUN gat./r• u1./ I$ I ' ' • ro•-f.,-v I-•.'J',set}. ! C f..rtim....ne n p..IY.Y.J..1 L.0 ul..r...a a row.Inls rNaa•roaa....her r I .o..,,wain -.i - ? ��'�a�•LORT Tk:1=Tf T� •pack, NO.r..la.•w.aa•....a pc.r Wan • It•. r / I tl / — --- p• `�- —� �4l.c,N - 8l-01 la'o� i -04 r4-L11 / \ 7.3 f — / g u 71 / im, „ - • . , J a, 0 / - . --- - - �•,__i._u 4 • - Jill i C / . /I-- C -74‘3t / I 0� . � `ZS �D', I 1I a / LT •\ / / Gla rr I uaa cw s_ ,;lei i I • •`I-�� + 6�1-IJI tl_�I 1,I-e.I SOiJNV o i rot 11-14C-I G�r1c - ... . 'SHa-.111.1 (/Z�j J I-d .<.uv/1 `440F1,1 ....OV.0.1,1 D....... jJ ED mAIN rLvUf' I L+J SLoTT MILT.... -.M,c 1,1. D..,7..4.....I/611 ..11_011 a S3511 43 r lase us wt. 4 J,T17 l0•1, pL.t ,I o ter.. 4 sbrw• 6lr- C W.I. • OVl•r • 'WP 2N4-ZQ ot..o aOW Ncn.\tiN 0/rAltI f\ oa. Si I l Cd "arrisc.(e341r•c of cam)C• 1 gAC C_ o Aga rJ• ot) nlntn.% n\ rim.. r1t'p (i.L) .v.rpspRW arwea hh11C-1ce0 be^•nr.Kto wrt.1 4Rr•Wr` Pi Nisi' imam. I I r I aa)- r I-I r T'ITT ♦ t Is- bp k- • 7 �1�' Si.Mao 4 suer~ 6w+iy� al�� II �b r� 4-111. `` i, if ,c Q Ii •tcl 1 -v sae..` ng4oJ w--tt_��r Cam"`.J��V v' ' � n • ' i .. I t • 921 , , 1 . , _____ , _ ---____ 17., _. .>„_,..... ._____......____ . ......_.. . • .......----. " , . • •. . . ..... _ - ice.' r— r� I =t LLL-L.---;L. L. II�J161,. o o • L• r ,-L. .... ... _:... ,__, .. 1 r '�„','1' .rYli Ir .- _ -■ ....k.,.■ T�I'Tl"1't' •.• • . ,,, -T__- _ - -—__r_--rG„, r / � � I- . _L� • - UEAIaIOH2 e • • • _ _ vro _= 11.1,t.es I _ —0 •. 17.I !-'9 71- PULW100 HALL. • 7'4 '7? orr a,IT t• 06aTtilcii WOW •- - - % I 41 I I 2.0-1.• Ourrerh rt-aPrA, PLAID f) 1/0 . ii_di • soubJP ePt.Ps I Ft,011.0c I Cori a oi.4rA oori A,„,,,.0,44 Are...or, NeV4.0 SCCDIT miLLer7, I.*••de. ion',calla , 0.•\./.0 Sdlrn NS.1.....11...••••11• • ..-.: \ • • • . - - ' ....—----•-• -..., - ( --•----. -_ -:- - --- --------------____ , ---- ---'::.:__. .-,-, ---------___ ' --- ----- -- "---.-.."-.-.7.; -- '------. — --...,--, ; -,--•- "1"311 .....,,,... -- i't--'1•- et.. -..-- . --- --• ,- •'••••• '.- - 2- ••••••- • '''k*• - ..S•••A..c. eitYS4 "./b.,,, '' 1,,,,.._•3 ••,'v- 1,1-44,v, vs. 1 .... ___,.- e••.--m--- r 44,,, , , , ,!... it.v7.,a., „ ----..-T.-- -----•4 .., . ____ . •, ,..„,). , ,0,4 „..!4.;,.._ ......e.„,p. •-•,..rsz:...„ _ -,•.•••••-•••••;-•"-4.---...-,.. .,_.,•-•.... 1. .-....- ' ''''' ‘ :414'1;12. t -.4 uj'AtZ ir '--•'Y ifil^ u5 -v - -- 1 - -. .--:--. ---------_, ) . , .1?_, : s----' 4, 11. .t. .* . -cv.,`,4 -....,1,72.__ •• ------.....?-,,,,, :, •' - --: I .. - -- c-- ?..,==. - . -z::... , _•.• " ..•••- ' / —- _ -- __••.=.—,'.. ..:. il_1\,_''''__ 4' t?Y., .1. ..,-P_,-;•b ''....,c--.-_.••••"Z:"4:4.:''7•' .- •;:..s=c v-• • ,fc, A ) ••• l =- - ___ .4__ . .• '4..,a. .-. %- .......141:1.3Fe'Vi.,..,:,;,.'... .;; --:,*--- 11 S , --,•;- — ,k• _ ...L.., .. . _______ ..., —, . ..,,,,,, .. ,':::,1,"":::,SF:'..- , ,,, -,-.- -, ..,....„,",,...4,11,,,:,,, v,, ..... %,afv., .,..:_ ,... _. --- ---. .. .",. .------ -..-1,,,c,-- 1 : ,!•...:ts, . _ •,.... ;.4,,_.;;,.,., ,.....-2,-- 5k...-41"44- -=- •—4—'2..7— - .44-;4:41-,'Y.'r z."4-'47.ic*-L6•-'---!%.....••••‘!'!::..4.4'. =7-'s ; :r::•• 4•;'• . -. --...,--. .---.4-4 .4i.--.-.-,7----x=m------..7- -----s-,..- 2V4 4'...,4; -1. '-';414*.--3.:4"44-1.2 '' Ill''''''L'44/A-:' .: —I. -- -4r's.."'- '4..:'-':;-. '''','L. :...r....-..:__ te-23im ,,:-...e. ‘ k. • , ••• '''• -•- - ''"i ''. -• • •• • •-a- -„.•Ic•- f';`:,'7`: ---7:-,- -0,1 •4• 4 e f 1p::•,• -•••• 4 , l' " - - • r- '''' "•14..-1.1.::-...••4 A.-- .•A"''.',) -4---------- ..-s--%44j ::::- .,,t••''-,',..Ar t,.° ...I% "4,---1•,; "(....9-21114r4-. v....„_., -.0--c::ix.i.t:,4,43_4-•',i, A Dak.,-,-,-- k -,•-f.: 'f. ' w.,• All '''''/-:: 11 II ' 'Ill -4”',-;-.7-7. 4:----=-=- •• , • ':.-'.. #--.*-0;..k.• '44 '''':Pf.--"j74' ,- „,. „ ;,'ll. `.. c` 1, I •.--- --k.;1' .,:.";tit ; VI \ r'Nf„ 1 Ito J1, ,, \14414Itr" • 1 -11 - . ra - : -. ,-*<....,-:,. ,Ar... ';•• . -!--•... ' -- -s".;*.- ,t.,.. . ''':. `1,- 6r--,,,• ____ ... I _=_.77.F77-_ __,, et '' -' ,:=0",...t.. - .e. ' ' a , —;To•up-' -,-, __ - ......,:- •.,-,.: _0-41i-fIDEL-......7, — _-_-,-----__!•,-, Ili, i [ ---•------.w...,--,,. ---, • -gin-°--•"•=21.4-':-7 7-‘P--- 111. -- --,-..„ ' ' 1 • I, 11,1 10 hi.ilk I gili Itt 11 It F0 101 it 1 t1 - „, e.: - ,,, 71,..- , .......nione %.1" .....,. - lit'•,:p ii••• '4, • cf.. '11110.01111W • :" . _-.,. 1 :: : -:- -A11101WENa i -'.-s,..r'1;It r,....f..- .•"t ' -c,-, --- - ....t , - • J.....,.:,..,..elv....4.7.-4..•..,. ),...".,,.4_, 5 ..,...... _ _.-_,-, , : ..„.. ......,--,-.- ,...' 2.,-2.-4,-..-f:•' .--- --•-r-L-----------,:r4.3,-5-;:.k.' T4'""'-ji: '''' ".'" - ''- --"""DIP•111110PIPIrVill41;11141WRIT-' : " ' , , 'Af!...:1-1,-,-y-, e- .-„, -- - _,.. ..,..-C-,1•.-01e.'- ' -••• ' -. . •` =--- 7••••A., • - 't•'-- ----------14.- ..,v'4; ,,,,.....„, ,.l 4 .1—• ----,...,..----- ....__ - it ,4 4' ---••-...-1-, ....,-:-_,11.. -".-'-',->i'd, .,..;.• ,• •1.*:, '7.i.,,,',,,:•, -: • • -- ------- ---- .-,,,..•,-:.D.,.,,, • ••••.t. ••,., ... •-•,. ' -:---.---- --- - -- --________ ---,-... -,------, _ 5,----, , - 1 7-1,r' , ••'; 1, ' '4,,, - i• -----------:- ._`-------,--______•=-._- -.---- ,..____---7-- : •-_:-.,_ --- -_____,___---=--., -- -''•-r-- .-• +.'• -4 .,--- ----f ---____---:_-_--_---=-----__ _.-. ---- ----7-77---1,7=-7----:-:---------------,-„_- _ •;r,.. o< .,, 4:,,•'-‘4 l'-^t ' ,--- . ,,,T3-• 1 -f • . 7---- r---;.,=---=-.7---,-_-t.i„--:-_-_---,_-_--___ .,r 44 •'' . .__:--_____ r ---------74..- ----,-_-_- _...__ ...., .4-'- ) r) \ - ../ i----- s',. ) ._.1-----1 i /..----•"f- --- , •-_____ _ . • • _ . ' . . • / . . / i., _. -I4es _z iii / . 0 ir, ... 7 , / __ hie i'ee're., 2JC.is' 174 ---------V-4-\ , i r • ' .... .9 1 _ t • . ,•e•/4 _...... (11 \ ir Ii.j4 d / •. (__. • ' , A. -.•,., ' ‘*-- r' 0. e 8# , -- -•- - 1 )4,, niii..2fr ?' • / V C . , — - •- F__ 4-.... . I X • l . l'/ . ' \.,. ii e 1- • . /• r'' \•(.. v 5 • / / .. a ________ . . , e , .•. 4, , ,,,. <, ''. - • • / 1 / ! •' . 0/ *e. . / ___1,____ , ,/ 4, . \ .• • / „-, . ., , . •••••• ,,.. ,., I , ,- ,..• q • 4, • P. A • • I , - - -.7-;.A•74-- . - - , . •"'..)).•• '' ,.., _...I. lk, 1-1 _4_ ."I 1 ..2,. fe..i .ce__t-a..___. ... sc. ri / u „ , ., si, 1 i / r 1‘ ,i. k,, it .. .ktiaILL- al I a i ( 4 ,. ,, .o.10 MiefAr 0 . ii ...' :Au. ' . . • ii•alg.o.vAvi) • .\ 111 4 Witi 44 1.' .• —1.--- <------ I \ , (-1 . t ' 4 .P I eft(INVICet) _____ rs1 ri.R.Eis-l••*11•••-r- r re.-' . ' , • I 1 r • oi 0 ,, s:t.V \F4151411.1 V 30' k- I 1 i ) 1. • L 4MN . . . r"' ..._......_ r: , 0 , , . .>: .. at.To 0,,‘414X--. vigiie• 1_...._ iii.4,.91.04,. I.'7L 1.4.411 . ,•;;/; 0 .. t. /4 i o - e ii s' • \ „o • I . ' I . 1.(Alek.. ._.11__&.. 44...:22!•If!A___—. ------/-1 I,' e ' L 4 • . • b.• • - . .,.., p. . . . c.\i p et...../ s' ill 11•,..4 a ,.. , • -.A 4 • ,.e 40,4*(.1.!,r _ , , ...„. . ..,. eit• ._ .......___ .._ ...._.--...._. - .... _ ., . • . v.- — IL." ...-..e. "•"." " '. .,',C3. .0,.', - 41..1' ... , . \ . 0 i_z __IC__;Wit10441,1h11 . . 0. .5U 1 1-1 'OH SI a-G r...-T 1 . .'• • • • ._. _ • t It ____ _ ___ —- -__ •-- - u . 140 ....•,,,.... pi,.siTs 5.1.11pas .1 1.11.1.1,1.44 P+11112.E /ITE Rfra tAinli44 . . -r,.. onvoo ar..1.pr,..brrf•••Pir. atlas, G•S'e, L4-t-loseAtii4ei, 60 UkiD al-04 ..6111C- rod TIAL frmeNx.r i vr,zieo,,ID gi14T6i-1, i,lx.A.14 • caJ T R444.0... Larva .---- 4 spite_ p Iell . acm.g1 hyng,,,jo ........, L.Z.L../44:14,../ ''''E'--:"184 PRAWN•V Sc#1..., WOMM 1 . e,wrlp, srlog lUorifri. ou crys sarJel Nor Call rfoOttlerj .5144/1cP6 / BEGINNING OF FILE i1LE TITLE J[� A - gci •s- 051 i 14 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT June 28, 1989 A. BACKGROUND: APPLICANT: Sound Auto/Scott Miller Architects PROJECT: Sound Auto ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF; SA-057-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B-1) zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. to cr. t Z -Z �� Z i S. (o TM S T NI ///7 \ 4/ • 7 i L _ ,,. c, _ , 7 it.' 5 T. kUl \I- F PROJECTr\-- \ X -,) ct �� LIMIT f� W \ o • i .� jr Y i .-GRAPY 1 l J l < . i ul '''( - '� I S. f(EN1F.7N vI,LgGE PL• I Environmental Revi-.. Committee Staff Report Sound Auto Page 2 June 28, 1989. B. ANALYSIS 1. BACKGROUND: 2 . ISSUES: Environmental Elements Whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts likely to occur in conjunction with this development? a. Housing The subject property is bordered to the east by property in the CBD zoned for multi-family residential use (R-3 and R- 4) . Uses immediately adjacent include one small apartment house build about 1959. Staff recommend that the evergreen trees proposed by the applicant as the landscape barrier at the eastern edge of the property be strengthened by the addition of evergreen shrubs to provide a more aesthetic visual buffer. A sight obscuring chain link fence with wooden slats already exists at that location and will be retained. b. Aesthetics The applicant proposes to construct a building that will be one story in height at the street frontages rising to two stories at the rear. It will have stucco siding, metal roofing , and tinted glass show windows. The structure will be oriented toward Rainier Ave. South and South Seventh Street in order to help define the street edge and contribute visually to the streetscape. Landscaping will be provided on all sides and in five percent of the parking lot behind the building. Staff recommend that: 1) the landscaping on the east side of the subject property be supplemented with evergreen shrubbery and 2) that landscaping be added to the northern boundary of the site. This additional landscaping is recommended in order to provide a stronger visual buffer between the proposed auto dealership and the neighboring properties (e.g. multi-family residence to the east and commercial development to the north) . The existing landscaping between the street and the sidewalk is in poor condition and needs to be restored. Similarly, it is recommended that the fencing on the east side of the property be retained/upgraded and that fencing be added along the northern periphery in order to supplement the landscaping buffer and' enhance noise mitigation between the site and adjacent residential development. Environmental Revi__� Committee Staff Report Sound Auto Page 3 June 28, 1989 c. Transportation The City's Traffic Engineering Division and Planning Division estimate only minor transportation impacts from this development. The automobile dealership is anticipated to generate approximately 253 AWDVTE, approximately 112 trip ends on Saturdays, and approximately 56 trip ends on Sundays. The anticipated level of traffic is not expected to reduce the currently acceptable level of service on Rainier Ave. South or South Seventh Street. The Traffic Engineering Division states that the curb radius on the Rainier Ave. South side of the corner of Rainier Ave. South and South Seventh Street must be modified to provide greater safety for automobiles rounding this corner from South Seventh Street onto Rainier Ave. South. The curb must be moved back approximately three feet and the sidewalk and landscaping modified accordingly. The required change in the curb radius is illustrated in the attached drawing. In addition, the first driveway east of Rainier Ave. South on South Seventh Street and the first driveway north of South Seventh Street on Rainier Ave. South must be removed and replaced with sidewalks and landscaping. Finally, the Rainier Avenue exit from the site is to be signed and painted for right-turn out only to limit impacts on that right-of- way. d. Public Services/Utilities The Storm Water Engineering Division states that a three chamber, baffled oil/water separator will be required to be installed in the existing storm drain system. -The roof drains of the new building also must be tied directly into the catch basins. Note: The Civil Engineering Division will not approve the application for a Building Permit until final civil engineering drawings are submitted for Department review. With the exception of the requirements stated above, staff report that sufficient service resources and infrastructure/utilities to serve the proposed development are available, with standard improvements (e.g. provision of lighting, signage, building identification, hydrants, secondary access) and with the payment of appropriate system development fees. Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Sound Auto Page 4 June 28, 1989 e. Noise, light and glare The proposed development, an automobile dealership, is anticipated to generate some noise, light, and glare. Operational impacts are discussed in this section; construction impacts are discussed in Section 2. f. of this document. This automobile sales operation is not generally anticipated to generate sound that is more significant than the level or type of sound generated by traffic on Rainier Ave. South, a major arterial. Staff recommend that in the event there is an intent to use a paging system to enhance on-site communications that a "hand-held paging" system be used, rather than a loudspeaker system in order to reduce off-site noise impacts. The applicant proposes to direct on-site illumination so that it does not generate light or glare to other properties nor impact passing vehicles. The applicant also proposes the use of lightly tinted (five to ten percent) glass for the windows,- thus reducing glare impacts from large display windows. Staff recommends the addition of landscaping and fencing to provide a further barrier against light and glare. f. Construction The proponent should be required to provide a construction plan that includes an erosion control plan, a plan for hours of operation and hauling, and a street clean-up bond of $1, 000 to ensure that construction activities do not place an undue burden upon the neighboring properties or the municipality. Note: The City of Renton Fire Prevention Bureau has determined that the underground fuel tanks that served the gasoline station previously occupying this site have been removed and any contaminated soil also has been removed.; C. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommend that ERC issue a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated, with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised landscaping/screening plan, which increases the number, size and species of plantings along the site perimeters, which improves existing screen fencing as appropriate, and which adds solid fencing along the northern perimeter, in Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Sound Auto Page 5 June 28, 1989 order to mitigate aesthetic impacts, noise impacts (to abutting residences) and light and glare impacts, as well as to provide defined site boundaries for purposes of crime prevention. This plan should be provided in advance of site plan review, and should be subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Planner. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.1.b and City of Renton Noise Level Regulations - 8-1101-1105) 2. That the applicant be required to post a landscape performance bond in the amount of $3, 000 to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the maintenance of plantings and irrigation systems to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. 1.b) 3 . That the applicant provide a revised site plan, in advance of site plan review, that meets the Traffic Engineering Division's requirements for a modified curb radius along Rainier Ave. South at the corner of Rainier Ave. South and South Seventh Street. Also, the driveway on Rainier Avenue should be signed and painted for right-turn out only. These revisions are recommended to improve safety and the efficiency of vehicular travel along adjacent corridors. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. l.b) 4. That the applicant provide a traffic mitigation fee of $18,234. 00 (253 .25 trip ends x $72. 00 per trip per the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone) in order to mitigate traffic impacts to the site. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. l.b. and City of Renton Grady Way TBZ) 5. That the applicant have in operation, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, hand-held paging devices rather than loudspeakers, in order to reduce noise impacts. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. l.b. ; E. l. f.and City of Renton Noise Level Regulations 8-1101-1105) 6. That the applicant be required to provide a plan for mitigation of construction impacts, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel washing of trucks on site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; and d) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of a site preparation plan and should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. (Environmental .Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.l.b. ) Environmental Revi-.. Committee Staff Report Sound Auto Page 6 June 28, 1989 7. That the applicant be required to post a $1,000 performance bond to ensure that the terms of the construction plan are met and the streets are kept clean according to City of Renton standards. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. 1.b. ) D. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS: 0 , Various City departments have reviewed and commented upon the project. These comments are as follows: Police Department: Probable minor impact - public services. Probability of people "shortcutting" through lot onto Rainier. Poor traffic pattern. Is there adequate parking available for inventory here? Inventory parking along 7th is unacceptable. Fire Prevention Bureau: Probable minor impact - public services. All fuel tanks and/or waste oil tanks are required to meet Fire Dept. approval for installation and containment. Design Engineering: Probable minor impacts - earth, air, water, transportation, and utilities. Have existing fuel tanks from gas station been removed? Traffic Engineering: Probable minor impacts - earth, air, plants, animals, energy & natural resources, transportation, public services, and utilities. Proposed site located in the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone. Traffic mitigation fee is as follows: Bldg. Area 5,329 sq. ft. Trip Rate 47,523/1, 000 sq. ft. Code 841 Mitigation Fee $72 per trip generated 47.523 x 5, 329/1, 000 = 253 . 25 trip ends $72 x 253.25 = $18,234 TBZ Assessment Fee 2) South 7th Street - First driveway east of Rainier Ave. South to be removed and replaced with sidewalk. (See attached drawing) 3) Rainier Ave. South - First driveway north of South 7th Street to be removed and replaced as shown in the attached drawing. ' Curb radius to be adjusted as shown in' curb cutback on drawing. Utility Engineering: Probable minor impact - utilities. Storm Water Utility: Probable minor impact - water. A baffled oil/water separator will be required to be installed in the existing storm drainage system. Roof drain should be tied into C.B. 's. Parks and Recreation: No comment sheet. Environmental Review Committee Staff Report Sound Auto • Page 7 June 28, 1989 Building Division: Probable minor impact - housing. Current Planning Division: Recommend DNS. Long Range Planning: Traffic is the major concern. The applicant should provide a traffic study to analyze the traffic flow in the area, particularly at the intersections near the site. The study should also address the cumulative traffic impact on the area. • . . . . . • 4/ • . • • • • ., .11 / / / • . ifj , • . , . • J. 1 -, _ N. ''•?• /; • .1 -'‘ ',i . . . . • •' • • 9. .. .. . -.. •4,4---,;,..-- ,, \..........,: / ).77 ,st. ...- . I• • • 4.• .., ,,-.,. e • i -- .- m• . 1, i. • , ...._,...., . . g - 41% •.../ : I . . • J tJ • . . _____L,;rtir.„, ....• - ri . ..._...- - p-iii,„,.....i... 1, AP ... . 4 ' .' •-•.......:„..:::-•..:. --------__ ‘. 1 4 •.i , ,•-•,.._• 1, ......, ..„..t.,, • - . 1 -..-.;'eak, ',Fs:: t. -.1 • • - 'I: Y., 1 I . V ! • . . . ! •--.fn.'s....; -- .;:.-• ' /If— Is' r7eff,;r,c , , ... , k,,,,,i41' Y I . ",.... •e'l... . 4" ii : • /s•/--. • / . i/ ' ii I •. ' '- . . ., . .... ! 1 , , , . I ,01 TO.14014•W ••• • . 1 vi.414.117getvpim..:+4‘.. . 11..):, • • ji .. ..; .: __ 12-7-1 4 • -1 — • . - ....... ... . . • .,- -.:---..34.-r• ..:..: . ... • •.• ._,,,, . •............„ .1:0 ... ....t • . ••!5;•'....--k:..- -4r:',..“. dej tl, - .... h__,.,• .-r..r-1-..e. .,.4... •sr • / gim , . mt• .\P• / .. „ -./ s- .. dir. • • . /r .,-,V . . .. ,./ . ..rsr- .: ri, .1•1 ., .. _•• - -.. . . - '-' ' •;,::-.7.:--2.k..:,,,-, • •. 'ON . 1 60: ,,,,,,,• .. ,,,, x ,,.• _____--41-.---•-•., •—• f, ...., -. .. ..i,..-a...:-LF.-- \ l/ 4)• ./" s 1 \ i I 4x e , . • • ,. . _ . \ ,.,_ . , . . .. i.: 4• : 311 . ,-.- ,....:•-• :-.. . ;. ..- .•tr.. .,ti C..) ts • • IA;I I 11 . •..--•••• • iii -,,-- 4..,. 0 .i.k.:._-...7.. .„.1...,,,,, ... 7.7i........... _, : _:,.;,s....... ,•,•• •,-,c,,.. :.•,. ..:-..,-!':.:-,,,,;-. •,--;,,,..,„ -• ----. ...?- •-_--, _ . ..,.,...,., Ca .• , v . i • ,. . ., . _ _ " r .. ..: •.:. y,..„...,. . 4 ' .7. '...' . ,V7--- ..' e•' ••' --,---P;•• •i: -4.:;:e4 .... - • .7' --r--------"-''-'-'7"------r-r----.•P " ri‘4 F.642. .0toreq• li TX,- . \ 11 -.,/'i.;..y.... -:.....;.‘,.....-‘t,s.T., ‘........ .10 . • - 0 ',lit ' ' ' is-. .- S:".:..... .4.. ..•_s. ... : ,..... e.....--........f.,:.:-..1). ', ...s. . _ ,-, '' ..i.4.,,'••• ...'.4..s:.,. . ,_ . ! ...:..— ".... •;.•-x7 -_. -., ; . - .., •• -" 1:-.:-.... : - • . : , •° • - Y \ . .Z0 -• - ......-------•---;-. . . .t ...... . ._ . .• . / ' e444SrWri 'ARtlei" 4. . • .. . • • ,k:... ••••• ea • ... , 4,:i TO. 0 TA . ... .. •• - ,:. •••. LAE- -rt, (2,. • . - • s... -", s• ••_ / • • ViAt, 1.0P;-,V-. - •Ci . _. .... 1 •si, .)x .. • .• . -1. .1 -. .. - • . N4t all • ' . \ VI4.104617 . • --------1" .. .. . : '41;c, ;' •• " , • • . . • . ' 4 . . . . . _. . _ • -„ .. • 0- = .- . • • vc. „ . - — s . , -/ . . • • .••• •. . - •-- . ,, .: ., • 1 - .. ...w , .. • . . . . .: ,.,.. . . . . . . , .., .• • Z\ -7 04.(y. t-_______.2._g---0________-75-u__,.-_,_ . . ?. , • -4* . ' ._ ._ .. . . 19+4_______ .. .. _,\.- -------- 4 .0.-r .g.. •., , ilik. r _ _ .. __ _. .. .. -----------•-•••- •----•---... • \_ . 4- 1 4--4.1411111111111111111111 -. • - .----_—_-_-_-_-- A.------- - ---. __._____ • --- .-•• ._. ._. • •-.•...•.•••- • • • _t '-'-5,"; ,i Rec/ ...c.I. •gefry,4,..4:7 -. e isf-1,.11 cirpae . a U - ...:, . .rflt. • (,:), --f. ' pi a.cr- -7.), la, si-dee: . --vp,,,p, . .1-a •. . . . i•-.\--, p 5 1 t--I • 1 -11"i - . . . • . . . . . . • . • . • • .... . • • . . . ." . • • - . _ - .-.-• - •.. - . • ...• . • . . . . • ., • . ... • _____----------- • : . . . . _. . . • .. .,.. . . •:• .. , .. . 1 . • " ,. . , .•. • _ . ume. :. • :. • . ti li . .• . . . • . . ,. .. . _ . • •.• .. . -I.* p,„‘op.1 Pg.s.1104 .." •- .- .•-.- . • . --. #4.4.,.s.tm --51‘44/544 i 10 .. _ . . •. . • , • • •-. • - •• .. - .•••• G . . . .. . • . • . . 1 • • . • . . . . . .. ., . _ 1:, dr. o • . -7-----..-.-----" ' .. . . . • • . P . • • •• • ..41:::::, 1 '-:::• _ .13 . .,, ... .. . . • r .• -.--',. .7.-asitg, .. .7.- . - • • .. - . . . ..- - • ••,•r 4'.-••••• --AILS;• •... • ':./.'.. -W..-.A . ...,,e_ : .... .. r•• .s,. .. . 4:44ii . . ,• . . , 1 . .. . • .. •• . •'• '- . . •.. _- . . . -- • . • . -•:'.•:--L. ,-;- t,:'-:i.f..4-:,:'..-..-',:1.1.;;;,1t21.1,•.4.-• - .- 4:.:4::-;,,,ii7.: • • ..,..:.:144!:-;::. t %4 0 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director MEMORANDUM DATE : September 8 , 1989 TO : Maxine .Motor , City Clerk FROM: San: .• ' Seeger, Planning RE : Sound Olds/Pontiac/GMC SA-057-89 With this memo I am sending the above referenced file to your office to be filed. \ 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • CITY OF RENTON / ;At. °-: ® COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor June 1, 1989 Scott Miller 10306 N.E. 10th Street, Suite 109 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Sound Auto Rainier Avenue South/South 7th Street ECF; SA 057-89 Dear Mr. Miller: The Community Development Department has formally accepted the above referenced application. It has been routed for departmental review and is tentatively scheduled for review by the Technical Advisory Committee on June 21, 1989. If you have any questions regarding the scheduling of this project, please contact Lenora • Blauman, project manager, of our office at 235-2550. Sincerely, (:)44.4t. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/ cc: Bob Bridge Sound Auto Stores 263 Rainier Avenue South, Suite 204 Renton, WA 98055 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION AUGUST 16, 1989 APPLICATION NO. : ECF; SA-057-89 APPLICANT: Sound Auto Stores LOCATION: 263 Rainier Ave. South SUMMARY OF REOUEST: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B- 1) zone on a 1.58 acre property. COMMITTEE REVIEW: The review was conducted at 9:00 a.m. on, August 9, 1989, in the third floor conference room of the Renton Municipal Building. The Committee review was conducted after receiving written comment from all divisions of the Public Works Department, all divisions of the Community Development Department, and the Fire, Police, and Parks Departments. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1 Yellow file containing application, proof of posting and publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2 Site plan (received May 18, 1989) . Exhibit No. 3 Landscape plan (received May 18, 1989) . Exhibit No. 4 Building elevation plans. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the Site Plan Review Committee now makes and enters the following: Findings: 1. The applicant, Sound Auto Stores, has requested site plan approval to allow construction of an automobile dealership in a Commercial zone (B-1) on a 1. 58 acre property. 2. The applicant's file containing the application, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3. Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43 .21.C, 1971 as amended) , a Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated was issued for the subject proposal on June 28, 1989, with the following conditions: Site •Plan Review Commi e Sound Auto Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 2 a. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, in advance of site plan review, that meets the Traffic . Engineering Division's requirements for a modified curb radius along Rainier Ave. South at the corner of Rainier Ave. South and South Seventh Street. Also, the driveway on Rainier Avenue should be signed and painted for right-turn out only. These revisions are recommended to improve safety and the efficiency of vehicular travel along adjacent corridors. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. i.b. ) b. That the applicant provide voluntary contribution for traffic improvements of $18,234 . 00 (253 .25 trip ends x $72. 00 per trip for the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone) in order to mitigate traffic impacts to the site. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. 1.b. and City of Renton Grady Way TBZ) c. That the applicant be required to provide a plan for mitigation of construction impacts, including: 1) an erosion control plan; 2) a plan for wheel washing of trucks on site; 3) a plan for periodic watering down of the site; and 4) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of a site preparation plan and should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. 1.b. ) d. That the applicant be required to post a $1, 000 performance bond to ensure that the terms of the construction plan are met and the streets are kept clean according to City of Renton standards. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. 1.b. ) The Environmental Review Committee reconsidered Condition #a and Condition #b, at the request of the proponent, on July 26, 1989; the Committee elected to retain the original conditions without modification. 4. Plans for the proposal have been reviewed by all City departments affected by the impact of this proposal. 5. The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial Use. 6. The site plan, as presented, provides sufficient parking to comply with the Parking and Loading Ordinance of the City of Renton. 7 . The subject site was annexed into the City in May, 1956 by the Adoption of Ordinance No. 1547. The site was zoned Business Use (B-1) on July 27, 1970 by Ordinance No. 2578. 8. Land use surrounding the subject site is Commercial Uses and Medium Density Multi-Family Residential Use. 9. The applicant's site plan complies with the requirements for information for site plan review, as delineated in the Site Plan Review Ordinance (4-738) , and as presented below: a. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, its elements and policies; The proposed commercial development does conform to the Comprehensive Plan Map designation of the property for commercial use. It is also consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies for Commercial r , ite •Plan Review Commit a. Sound Auto Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 3 Development, such as V.A.4. which calls for commercial areas to be located and designed to minimize travel and congestion and to promote safety; V.B.4. which calls for site plan . design to provided for efficient and function use of land, and V.B.S. which calls for developments to be designed to avoid adverse impacts on adjacent properties. Similarly, the project is generally consistent with Urban Design Goals, Objectives and Policies for area growth patterns, for maintenance of district integrity and for improvements such as landscaping and signage. The proposed automobile sales facility is planned to redevelop a site which was previously developed with a gasoline service station which has been demolished, leaving an abandoned site. The automobile sales facility will serve to upgrade the appearance, and, thus, the value of the site, through the creation of attractive structures and grounds. The development is to be located adjacent to S.W. 7th Street and Rainier Avenue, two principal travel corridors, and nearby to numerous commercial and industrial developments. The project, as proposed and/or recommended, is designed and sited on the property in a manner which will ensure compatibility between this development and neighboring commercial uses. Further, the project has been designed in a manner which complements nearby residential uses (See Sections 9.c. and 9.d. for additional information) . b. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The planned automobile sales center has generally been proposed by the proponent to be designed to conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements/development standards for Commercial Use (4-711) , such as lot coverage, setback, height and bulk requirements. Similarly, the development as proposed meets requirements set in the Parking and Loading Ordinance (4-2204) for parking facilities, maneuvering areas and access routes. Finally, the landscaping plan as recommended by the Environmental Review Committee in conjunction with environmental review (See Section 3 above) is consistent with requirements established in the Landscaping Ordinance (4-744) . c. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; Off-site impacts have been identified in the following areas: housing, aesthetics, traffic, noise and light and glare. 1) Housing As previously noted, residential development (primarily multi-family units) exists to the east of the proposed development. Particular efforts have been made -- through recommendations for structural design and location, landscaping/screening, parking and access routes, noise mitigation, light and glare mitigation, and similar measures -- to minimize impacts upon local residents. 2) Aesthetics Potential aesthetic impacts relating to the proposed development have been identified based upon the fact that the site is adjacent to the residential development, as described above, and, also, abuts Rainier Avenue (a State Highway which is an entryway into the City) and S.W. 7th Street (a principal arterial) . In order to mitigate those impacts, the project has been proposed to incorporate a Site••Plan Review Commis e ` Sound Auto Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 4 number of features to enhance design and function. For example, the structure is to be located at the junction of the two roadways, so that it is convenient to and visible . from the rights-of-way. It is planned to be one-story in height and its facades of glass/stucco and metal roofing are attractive, durable and compatible with nearby developments. Similarly, landscaping, screening, on site-illumination and signage shall, with redesign, complement the development and mitigate off-site impacts. For example, the landscaping plan will be required to include plantings at the periphery of the site and within the site which are sufficient in size, number and diversity to provide an attractive viewscape and visual buffer to adjoining properties. Screening of the eastern boundary provides a visual and noise buffer to abutting residential uses; screening of the northern boundary similarly mitigates impacts to the adjacent commercial development. Exterior lighting fixtures are to be designed to direct illumination away from abutting sites; additional fixtures will be required to ensure adequate lighting of the outside vehicle showroom as a crime prevention technique. Signage will be required to conform to City regulations, be architectually integral to the building, to be compatible with abutting developments and to be appropriate for location on a principal arterial/entryway to the City. 3) Traffic Off-site traffic impacts will be discussed in Section 9. f. below. 4) Noise, light and glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated below in Section 9.h. d. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; On-site impacts from the proposed development have been identified in the following areas: aesthetics, traffic, noise, light and glare. 1) Aesthetics The proposed design of the retail sales facility (e.g. glass/stucco facades, convenient access, visible entries) , the proposed location of the facility and the outside vehicle storage area, the recommended landscaping plan, the recommended screening plan, the recommended exterior illumination plan and the proposed signage plan should combine to provide an attractive, efficient project for users and passersby. 2) Traffic On-site traffic impacts will be reviewed in Section 9. f. below. 3) Noise, light and glare Noise, light and glare impacts are evaluated below in Section 9.h. -Site-Plan Review Commi e Sound Auto Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 5 e. Conservation of area-wide property values; The planned office project is not expected to have a negative impact on property values in the area since development is proposed/recommended to be designed to: 1) improve the attractiveness and efficient use of the site; and 2) be compatible with uses on neighboring properties. f. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The ITE Report states that an automobile sales facility of the type and size of the proposed development can be estimated to generate approximately 254 ADWVTE; a similar number of trips could occur on weekends. Staff report that off-site impacts from the projected number of vehicle trips can be mitigated by participation in local and regional transportation improvement projects, as recommended in conjunction with the environmental review for this project (See Section 3 above) . On-site impacts have been mitigated by the proposal for a parking and loading system which conforms to the City's Parking and Loading Ordinance requirements for numbers of spaces, dimensions, maneuvering areas and ingress/egress points. This plan, together with a plan for pedestrian linkage and proposed exterior illumination, allows for safe, efficient passage by vehicles and pedestrians on the site. g. Provision of adequate light and air; The development has been proposed/recommended to be designed and sited so that the structure and the outside storage area for new vehicles are well-separated and screened (by landscaping and fencing) from the neighboring commercial development to the north and the neighboring residential uses to the east. The design/location of the project is such that there are no significant interference to light or air to those abutting properties. The site is separated from developments to the south by S.W. 7th Street and separated from development to the west by Rainier Avenue. h. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; 1) Construction Construction activities will generate some noise, dust and debris to the site and the surrounding area. Mitigation measures recommended in conjunction with environmental review (See Section 3 above) are sufficient to address impacts upon adjacent residential and commercial developments and upon Rainier Avenue and S.W. 7th Street as well. 2) Operation The proposed automotive sales development is anticipated to create some noise and light and glare impacts upon surrounding residential and commercial developments. Site•-Plan Review Commi Sound Auto Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 6 Noise generated by operation of this development to residential properties to the east is of particular concern. Mitigation measures required in conjunction with environmental review and with this land use review -- fencing, hand-held paging systems rather than loudspeakers -- and location of the showroom/office well-away from the residences are anticipated to limit sound to a level no greater than that emanating from S.W. 7th Street which abuts those residential properties. Noise generated by routine operation of this facility is determined to be no different in type or greater in intensity than those sounds generated by the commercial development to the north, or the roadways to the west and south of the site. An accoustic wall will limit noise impacts to the property to the north. Hand-held paging systems will reduce distraction to persons travelling on the right-of-way and limit interruption of activities taking place on the nearby commercial uses. Light and glare to abutting properties can be mitigated through screening, landscaping, and the direction of on-site illumination to the interior of the site. Automobile service operations are not scheduled to take place on this site, so staff anticipate no significant odors or spill contamination. i. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use; and Development of the proposed retail sales complex, with recommended environmental conditions (see Section 3) and land use mitigation measures is not generally expected to create an undue burden on public services and facilities in the area. Neither the Police Department nor the Fire Prevention Bureau has indicated that the proposed facility would place a major burden on their respective services if code provisions (e.g. signage, lighting) are met. The site is adequately served by utilities lines (water mains, sanitary sewers) with connection requirements as stipulated by City Ordinance and Code. Storm drainage management, similarly, can be achieved through standard improvement systems, as specified by the Public Works Department. j . Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The proposed facility is expected to have a generally positive impact on surrounding properties and on the local area as a whole by providing new development on a formerly developed, now vacated and abandoned site, and by making efficient use of a property which is convenient to nearby arterial streets. Conclusions: 1. The subject proposal generally complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. k Site—Plan Review Commit Sound Auto Report and Decision August 16, 1989 Page 7 2 . Specific issues raised by various City departments and focused on were: a. Participation in local and regional traffic improvement plans. b. The provision of adequate landscaping and screening in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts, noise impacts (to abutting residences) , and light and glare impacts, as well as to provide defined site boundaries for purposes of crime prevention. c. The provision of a fully improved storm water management system. d. Noise, light and glare mitigation. 3 . The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Commercial Use. Decision: The site plan for Sound Auto Stores, file no. ECF; SA-057-89 is approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant comply with all conditions established by the Environmental Review Committee on June 28, 1989, in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits. 2 . That the applicant provide a revised landscaping/screening plan, which increases the number, size and species of plantings along the site perimeters, which improves existing screen fencing as appropriate, and which adds solid fencing along the northern perimeter, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts, noise impacts (to abutting residences) and light and glare impacts, as well as to provide defined site boundaries for purposes of crime prevention. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of site preparation/building permits and should be subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Planner. 3 . That the applicant be required to post a landscape performance bond in the amount of $2, 000 to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the maintenance of plantings and irrigation systems to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. 4 . That the applicant have in operation, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, hand-held paging devices rather than loudspeakers, in order to reduce noise impacts. 5. That the applicant provide a revised on-site exterior illumination plan, with an increased number of standards in the vehicle show parking area. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of building permits and should be subject to the approval of the City's Planning Division. For the purpose of these decisions, the term "should" and "shall" are to be considered mandatory and the term "may" is considered discretionary. Notes to Applicant: An applicant complying with these provisions and willing to hold the City harmless for any expense or damages incurred for work begun prior to the exhaustion of the 14,-day appeal period and/or for work which may consequently be stopped by an appeal or work required to be altered or returned to its preconstruction state, may begin construction activities with the issuance of the proper permits. Sjte..Plan Review Commis e Sound Auto Report and L, ision August 16, ,1989 Page 8 ORDERED this 16th day of August, 1989. on behalf of he Site Plan Review Committee. C:17\10i Donald K. Ericks n, AICP Zoning Administrator TRANSMITTED this 16th day of August, 1989, to the parties of record: Scott Miller 10306 N.E. 10th Street, Suite 109 Bellevue, WA 98004 Bob Bridge Sound Auto Stores 263 Rainier Avenue South, Suite 204 Renton, WA 98055 TRANSMITTED this 16th day of August, 1989, to the following: Mayor Earl Clymer Lynn Guttmann, Public Works Director Ken Nyberg, Community Development Director Larry Springer, Planning Manager Ronald Nelson, Building Director Councilman Richard M. Stredicke Members, Renton Planning Commission Glen Gordon, Fire Marshall Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Valley Daily News REOUESTS FOR RECONSIDERATION must be filed in writing on or before September 1, 1989. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Site Plan Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior meeting, may make a written request to the Zoning Administrator for review by the Site Plan Committee within fourteen (14) days of the decision. This request shall set forth the specific errors relied upon by such appellant, and the Committee may, after review of the record, take further action as it deems proper. If an appeal is made to the Hearing Examiner, requests for reconsideration will be forwarded to that office for consideration at the same time as the appeal. AN APPEAL TO THE HEARING EXAMINER is governed by Title IV, Section 3011(B) (1) , which requires that such appeals be filed directly with the Hearing Examiner. Appeals must be made in writing before 5 D.M. on September 1, 1989, accompanied by a $75. 00 fee and other specific requirements. THE APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS DOCTRINE provides that no ex parte (private one-on-one) communications may occur concerning land use decision. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial committee decision, but to all Request for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the Hearing Examiner. All communications after the decision date must be made in writing through the Zoning Administrator. All communications are public record and this permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence in writing. Any violation of this doctrine could result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. • • :: ` CU?i Ei...:.::;..,.;.:.LA.:..::.. ''`' >`: VTO ? ME=E • On the - day of N, , s* , 19 , I . deposited in the mails of the United States a sealed envelope containing Si-6:._. f)69,-\ c1ru ►mrN documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing i� n�1 �_ Sow-NA AcAn s M;fee • Signature of Sender) ` Nu-Y4ym_ - � Subscribed and sworn to me this ?"/SfTday of /1/4-G7 . 19 g' ?-2")0c/f/C:efet/&,--)e.W„,&"0 Notary in and for the. State ,9f Waphington residing ,at t��x� therein. �ect Name. ; �iY'�ra�:: ..0 :.:::. ::. .. ..:..: ;:->�> :.:<::..`:: :;;:: •�2•:.::::::::::-.:::�;::::::::;:::;::`:>::?;::::'::::;:2:::::: ::::i:: ::;:�::: ::; ::i:>iiii>::::::i::::;:5::::5 •• sli • -K,, % °A I CITY OF RENTON hal/ '``>: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 31, 1989 • Scott Miller 10306 N.E. 10th Street, Suite 109 Bellevue, WA 98004 • Re: Sound Auto Rainier Avenue South/South 7th Street ECF; SA-057-89 Dear Mr. Miller: This letter is to inform you that the comment period has ended for the Determination of Non- Significance-Mitigated for the above referenced project. Your comments and request for reconsideration were received. The Environmental Review Committee on July 26, 1989 reconsidered Condition Nos. 1 and 2 and retained the original conditions with the following explanation: A. Condition No. 1 - calling for curb construction is based upon a customary requirement for upgrading off-site improvements to meet current City standards at any time when a project is initially implemented or redeveloped. B. Condition No. 2 - calling for a voluntary contribution of $18,230 for the Grady Way TBZ is, similarly, a standard condition to facilitate necessary regional improvements. The $39,000 which you have previously provided to the City is for off-site improvements adjacent to your property, which are also customarily required. City regulations/policies do not permit fees for off-site improvements to substitute for TBZ regional contributions. The Committee's determination is final and may be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner no later than 5:00 p.m. on August 14, 1989. Any'appeal must state clearly why the determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Facsimile (I f( l 235-2513 Scott Miller • Jha1y 31, 1989 Page 2 If you have questions or desire clarification of the above, please call Lenora Blauman, Senior Planner and project manager for this project, at 235-2550. For the Environmental Review Committee, • Jtk Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:mjp cc: Bob Bridge • Sound Auto Stores 263 Rainier Avenue South, Suite 204 Renton, WA 98055 kfCila"^, 51067 • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION is 1 1 a n- T..�vi Lls ,beingfirst dulysworn on oath states NOTICE OF DETERMINAEZIRONMTION AL DETERMINATION that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Environmental Review Committe, Renton, Washington VALLEY DAILY NEWS Theas EnvironmentalssedaReview on of (ERC) has issued a Determination of Signific ice-Mitigated for the followin • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn Edition ject unuer the authority of the R Municipal Code. The following App has completed a mitigation process.: Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers SOUND AUTO are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ECF: ,-057-89 months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published A . -ant seeks site plan appr in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King develop an automobile dealership (lutes.,. showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal .,tone on a 1.58 acre property which is newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for prt 'developed with a gas station and King County. park. ot. The property is located at the northeaut corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition Further information regarding this action Renton Edition S( Auburn Edition is available in the Community Development , (and not in department, Municipal Building, Renton, supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Washington, 235-2550. This Determination during the below stated period. The annexed notice a is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5:00 PM on August 14, 1989. Any appeal of this decision may be No i c o Of L n v i r n n ma n t-a l nn t o rmi-1ai-i Q l made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,Washington. An appeal must state was published on Jit1 y 11 1 cmq 'Z36/1; _ clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompa- nied by a non-refundable $75.00 filing fee. Published in the Valley Daily News July The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the 31, 1989. R3646 sum of$ Subscribed and sworn before me this 1 day of au,i _ 19 pia ` l N ry Public for the State of Washington residing at Auburn, King County, Washington VDN#87 Revised 4/89 .. 1 N OT I C E ' A ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION APPLICATION NO. ECF-057-89I, SA-057-89 APPLICANT SOUND AUTO SCOTT MILLER ARCHITECTS PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP (INTERIOR SHOWROOM/EXTERIOR LOT) INE THE COMMERCIAL (B-1) ZONE ON A 1.58 ACRE PROPERTY WHICH 'IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A GAS STATION AND PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS NORTHEAST CORNER OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH SEVENTH STREET. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT 'THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES 1 DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL ' 1 WILL NOT - BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE..BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH TIM,OigrON9$1EARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • I CERTIFICATION L . Nl"'zi ^wiP__ , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 3 } : ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE IOSIEU BY ME IN COPIES OF c;' CES ON UR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED. PROPERTY 01J % 195fCONSPICUOUS /Ara ,. 9 i- ATTEST: Subscribed a� eNorn to i' Notary Public, -In me, a ' , •In and for the State of Washington j: ' residing It, �z —. _ / , on the _a/_GAT • •do of I: yYi /�q .SiGNED :_ �;��k ,�-.o/� ;: . I . . N OT ICE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION 1 APPLICATION NO. ECF-057-89, SA-057-89 APPLICANT SOUND AUTO SCOTT MILLER ARCHITECTS PROPOSED ACTION APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP (INTERIOR SHOWROOM/EXTERIOR LOT) IN THE COMMERCIAL (B-1) ZONE ON A 1. 58 ACRE PROPERTY WHICH IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A GAS STATION AND PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS NORTHEAST CORNER OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH SEVENTH STREET. POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES Cgi DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT I I WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE .BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH TI}EN7ON911EARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 2 3 5-2 5 5 0. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Review Committee Renton, Washington The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. The following Applicant has completed a mitigation process: SOUND AUTO ECF; SA-057-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B-1) zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. The property is located at the northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. Further information regarding this action is available in the Community Development Department, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington, 235-2550. This Determination is FINAL. There is a 14 day appeal period which will end at 5: 00 PM on August 14, 1989 . Any appeal of, this decision may be made to the City's Hearing Examiner, Municipal Building, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, Washington. An appeal must state clearly, in writing, why the Determination should be revised and must be accompanied by a non-refundable $75. 00 filing fee. Published: July 31, 1989 • CITY OF RENTON CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: July 26, 1989 TO: Environmental Review Committee FROM: Donald K. Erickson Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Sound Auto, Grady Way and Rainier Avenue (057-89) STAFF CONTACT: Lenora Blauman (2550) Sound Auto has requested ERC reconsideration of conditions relating to traffic mitigation measures. Their specific concerns related, initially, to the City's requirement that they replace an unsafe curb cut constructed by the City, and the City's request for a contribution of approximately $18,000 for the Grady Way TBZ. (See attached note dated July 17, 1989) The ro onent's concerns p p o cerns were shared with the Traffic Division. On July 25th the Traffic Engineer submitted a response stating that the original mitigating conditions should be retained. (See attached memo from Gary Norris). On July 25th the proponent responded to the' Traffic Division memo, agreeing to replace the curbing, and to contribute to-the TBZ, with the proviso that the cost of curb replacement be deducted from the TBZ assessment. (See note from Scott Miller). • Staff note that the Traffic Engineering Department refers to an agreement with property owners for curb improvements at the time of redevelopment of the site -- however, no written document exists to support the presence of such an agreement. Staff also note that the Grady Way TBZ, to which the applicant is being asked to contribute, has not formally been accepted by the City. Staff recommend that the applicant's suggestion that he provide (or allow the City to provide).improvements to the curb cut, and that those costs be deducted from the TBZ contribution be accepted. The suggestions appear to be appropriate and reasonable in their own right, and a suitable compromise owing to the absence of a written agreement requiring such improvements and the "unofficial status" of the Grady Way TBZ. A representative of the Traffic Engineering Division will be present at the ERC meeting to answer.questions. Thank you for your consideration. 0p9.5v uMir g-vr 74 d..2r7i �� ++ dl li •-z.; . Inwn If • 7 5ad of 5 /4.1 a4embl ar Ar 3s c^QUSaJ 1 49 -/1-btW0I ..1-5-01 3 1 c v '3,1a2'oM 4w, wicry -20,42-1 k,(3/52/1... -7,-(4) mxv tA_B-2) c vt3t) NIrif C''919 3}LP ` Sor4WvW s-u.S (110bo ruk tit'elb'-T/ `AIM -74,00 1t1444 1.0,L. - C's -anti Cr'nrnC -� I�rO4o'.3 d 2cs r nwkiotin q crairtari 1.4 IstelL • , If i I . CITY OF RENTON MEMORANDUM DATE: July 25, 1989 TO: Lenora Blauman,n,� Senior Planner FROM: Gary Norris,'°Transportation Services Manager SUBJECT: Sound Auto South 7th Street & Rainier Ave. South This memo is in reference to Scott G. Miller's correspondence dated July 17, 1989. 1. Information request on new curbing' cutback on northeast corner of intersection. Response: The attached drawing should be forwarded to Scott Miller. South 7th Street Roadway Improvement Project: In exchange for a needed sidewalk easement with the Wolf Brothers, owners of property in question, we agreed not to disturb the driveway on Rainier Ave. South because itiwas the main access to the Serve-U gas station business. Now that the usage of the property is changing, we are requesting a minor adjustment in about 10 feet Of curb curve radius. As is, turning vehicles hit the curb because we had to match the curb radius back into the existing driveway. Now that the driveway is being removed and replaced, we are requiring the developer to match the replaced driveway curb into an improved curb radius. 2. Sound Auto says they paid $30,000 for roadway improvements. Response: As a condition of property development for usage as a truck sales lot, the property owner was required to install off-site improvements which were for curb, gutters, sidewalks, roadway widening and street lighting. These off-site improvements were deferred and were installed as part of a larger City roadway improvement project. The City was reimbursed by Sound Ford !or the improvements. y" • Lenora Blauman Page 2 July 25, 1989 3. Sound Auto says they feel they are ,paying double for improvements if they pay $18,234 on a transportation benefit zone. Response: The charge for the transportation benefit zone is to mitigate the traffic impact in the Grady Way transportation benefit zone corridor. This is an altogether different fee from the off-site improvements. Purpose of the Grady Way transportation benefit zone is to provide necessary roadway improvement needs for the Grady Way corridor to accommodate a full development scenario for the year 2000. This is also a means to provide an equitable public/private cost sharing program with costs distributed fairly among the individual property owners. The transportation benefit zone charge is required if supported by ERC. The charge is voluntary if not supported by ERC. If any other questions arise, please let us know. CEM:ad Attachment CEM138 ..t \ \. 41', 1' /1 / • . 4••••••••r- / ., • le ,/ / ‘ ' //// i • 41 .N., • r . ./ .7. _.;,, • ., • ,,,•,.,,,. . ..„,,,_ . • . ,_ ...:,.___ , , . i.:......•.„:„.: , _ ,.._:___T_____.,____. .., ...„, e X. • . / • • t' ..- •-• ,= . t i: ... 2 . . / -e ,/ ' ;1 •7-3.- III _...1L2,.,... - ;A \ / ,- g 4, . .'/ .;.• '.-.::.-..: ...'• . , - 4 - I 4 . . /j/\#1‘3, % ' \ / , / / v • _ ,,) • 4 •• \ ., , . . . I I -44.3 t T 1 . -.•-. , , -....„.... •._ • -II , ° 1 1 ., N' /-' V • $ • ,, , . , ' - • .• - - _J • .3 '' • . • • . . . .,,. .4 ......,,:-._ ....,...„,s.,....... .....),:4-..,i....s. . •-- . ••,...,.. . .. —It-7-- . .01 16!i.V•114‘tve a - --_.-.--4,-4,1 g: /? '\‘ ii AP / I TR•ow.4 4,0 -.. . .-r LItt ••141 ' 4. %, . . \ // '-... . ------. . ...... . . ..... 't .‹.....'....._ /e '.. bl'• . . at, •..„,,Y •-•.-s. -. .- ...''.- •- ..... / . „ • '-‘`. 4, • ‘4,414 I N . . _ 1 2' - •-• •1 • - • w • ... • A •.-_.-..,-:.;,.. -,.::...i....,•,.. ......-•..-41.,y,r,, ,,,..„ -.4 ,e.-;..,• ... -'...... ...-. , 1 ..,--r• -,-,. V; 414> .- ., • \ -1 ' - ,. _I,.-..._-- ________1/_;•_... i !-.'_*.-;,- --,-!. 'f-• ..".', ,..'.. :A":.L, -...,.,, ,,,..:..:,...,...,r2-01%...::,.. ' - , - ,• ...: ,t,,...A...v.. • 41' • .ON • • 0, - . ,. ..0.1..,.... ,:z s. .5jA.-i- , •: 1..--•''-""- ,"" • A) ... r er ,....- -- • -. : - .,. .• • ...• , 45...-; .,...,is.. .' " • • -- • `.•*- • -. g.,: •-• -‘47 '.-. - • • ' • . :i•.'- • -- +. o 6\ 47 e,.''.:4 \ 1 r x w 1.J i7r01.1,?..4,e.;4-1 P - 1 1 • _ . J . . - . .. I - . -...•- 1''.......-.•- T -' r I * '..'•--,i---.'--. !'_!..*,..,_-i.._-_-• •f-.e... 1 . .-:•::''-!.44,,L • „. , ..,_ , ' --,- -1-- ve % ;s1r-i--.....--..--- •- . ...., • -.1.„, • le t 0, • \ - • mi.& rit.e. •Etz-4. s. i 2.. . •.7. ,• L...• i.. ; ‘. •-. . - e --.- • , ,c. •V I • .4 - • - -' - L 0 . or• ._ : ,c.t .._ .. .1.:.1..1. :. „.., , t./ ta . , ' •. . : , - f . 4 , • r \ • ... . .. .- l .'E.' '. .....--.... ""..‘.. ‘ , t • 1 . .Z a "': • . t •- . .•.. •' . : • ii. 1 . le / ‘ . 4 efq5ntiCt .AP431 e r y I .. . r 0,4_. s. 0. , ' \ a..e. -4-49 014. • ; Via•E;' VD.kll a . .• . • -" • 1. .s --, • 7, >,c - . 2 '.":'• . \ R. r10-teor? • .. , .. . . • 1 ---.• -• .. % dr, ''1; ./ •,./.• 2'\ : ‘ - . .1 s . 0 7 '.- .' ' -- . • --' .. 0 4/11; . • i '/ • \ .- . ... , . . • "' . .. • 4 p ti.•::::::-.: . 1 - ....04. '' V 4' > ( e • t,./. /• .-- •, . %, . . , ... . . .. .. . 0 • ,.• ,• , .. , , • ., , .: %., 4,- . • : 1 /C>. 0...,.., -.• ) 4 - 1/4 r _ . i 0 _ 1- ..---G '., .t 1 4.101.4 4 rr.•.-t —1.0• ---t .11.- -- ---- ----• --...- I , 1 : k';':llIllIllIllIll ! \ .. .— 1. ----.--— C ....Ti,. -------....- „....._ ..•• ....... I- .. CI Q •-••. .a..7 Ped e S-/'r i v h gefr,,,,„ve etsf-,,t 1 cl r',tie .1 ' • , . w• . ti ')-rt'l -./ 5;a1E4: _ • 5aU 114 • ' CY . , . . ._. , . • -.: , • . -. . • .• ..4... • ........ , • _ 1 • • ------------ . • - • , •. t•larr• tig. 54 krt.41441.4 le 44 1"1.1 . .• . - •---- litid 30 . . . • • • . • . 'le 644.1)PA 9'1' e ti .1 .. . • . _ _ . .. ..,. . 0 •. . . . , .. . . .. . . . _ . . • .. ' .• . . . ........ . . . . r2 - - • • -:----)_, C--) n . . • . --- . . _. - • '. . --' - ' - . ... libiZar AS Mir -••••=w- .; .... - . 1 k. -r-;•-- -. ' • • ..„ • . •. .. . _ • ...._ ., . .-. „. . . -11 . -• z-- . - • , -. . . ... . _. .. ..• _ , . '- . . .. .-. .'" ••--x•••- • •„,clic,'''• '•••;.:'-..:.•..r.- --.•:1,..,..- -+, ---- '' - '•• •: .."-:;:•-••..... -.,.-:.s. '''' : 7•-":...,.,---' •-L:--...t-t'••;fr.!---,,;--` -It-,1,111, „.............t.,•••••46 • •4'-: ' '''' ''''' i ';-.7-.4.1'-'1.‘:,..•:.,..'''..A,V-i4,;7•,'"''''---.`"'"-q'''''N'' ',..,...e• - ' ''.V......4&.•-•,.• • . 'li-,4,..5.1,;',' -411-.1,,g .42 rETRO-` Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 July 20, 1989 rm ' JUL 2 4 1989 ; Environmental Review Committee r� `tip Lec/o Donald K. Erickson U Zoning Administrator Planning Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No: ECF-057-89 Sound Auto Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed this proposal and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. Sincerely, Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4934 -: m D ETR - 1 - . Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598 July 18, 1989 Environmental Review Committee \ c/o Donald K. Erickson FT JUL 2 1 1989 1: a i; Zoning Administrator i , E Planning Department C L(1, U U 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 Determination of Non-Significance File No. : ECF-057-89 Sound Auto; ECF-043-89 Geometrix Architect Dear Environmental Review Committee: Metro staff has reviewed these proposals and anticipates no significant impacts to its wastewater facilities. Thank you for the opportunity toireview and comment. Sincerely, A....1.-, a‘t.......,)(________ 1 Gregory M. Bush, Manager Environmental Planning Division GMB:wsg4934/4935 WiWashington State I Duane Berentson Department of Transportation Secretary of Transportation District 1 15325 S.E. 30th Place July 18, 1989 Bellevue,Washington 98007-6538 • (206)562-4000 Don Erickson Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 SR 167 MP 26.721CS 1716 Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance Sound Auto • File No. SA-057-89 Dear Mr. Erickson: This letter is in response to the Determination of Non Significance (Mitigated) we received from the city of Renton on July 10, 1989 . The proposal is for an automobile dealership on a 1. 58 acre parcel at the Northeast corner 'of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. If any channelization work is required on a state highway, the plan is to be submitted to the state for review and approval before work is commenced. If a state highway is designated in the haul plan the state would appreciate being a participant in the review and bonding process . of .the plan, particularly if the haul route extends beyond the corporate limits of the City of Renton. Normally, the Department of Transportation recommends that the developer commission a traffic study to determine if 10 or more peak hour trips (AM or PM) , will travel through a single state intersection. If this condition is found to be true, a traffic analysis should be prepared using current volumes at the - intersection( s) . The analysis should calculate the LOS at the intersections impacted by 10 or more peak hour trips for the existing condition • and the design year of the development. , The analysis should include figures illustrating directional distribution, background • traffic, development traffic, and future traffic. The analysis should assess the need for mitigation, check the turning radii for the types , of vehicles utilizing the development, and check the sight distances at each intersection. ; � H Don Erickson July 18, 1989 Page 2 If the traffic study does show an impact at a state highway intersection, the Department of Transportation would appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on the mitigation measures proposed in the traffic study. Thank you for the opportunity to review this proposal. Should you have any questions and/or concerns, please feel free to call Donald Hurter ( 562-4274) or Dick Aust ( 562- 4274) of my Developer section, or myself ( 562-4267) . Since ely, J ES L. LUTZ, P.E. ilities/Developer ervices Engineer DA:da cc: WSDOT State Aid - MS 121 . e-S 7 7' y fr..� C 1� �� C, 1P- �� • I l ». ft ROADWAY ANDAITILITIES . - .� r, EASEMENT - - • _• .-� X TO. THIS INSTRUMENT, made this / day ofcc/i 19 gS by and between U-Save Oil Co. , Inc. and Mark Wolf and Richard Wolf and and hereinafter called "Grantor(s)," and the CITY OF RENTON, a Municipal Corporation of King County, Washington, hereinafter called "Grantee." WITNESSETH: That said Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of $1 .00 (One 4 Dollar and no/100) paid by Grantee, and other d,l valuable consideration, do by these presents, grant, bargain, sell , convey, and p warrant unto the said Grantee, its successors and assigns, an easement for 0 roadway, sidewalk, slope and public utilities with necessary appurtenances ri over, through, across and upon the following described property in King County, dWashington, more particularly described as follows: m • •II . See attached Exhibit A • 1 85/0 r/18 #0431 B RECG F 5.00 CPSHSL **4:*:5,00 55 • 1,:,; _ _...g.....„...".....-,.....,_•._ . Together with a temporary construction easement described as: p Y Said temporary construction. easement shall remain in force during construc- tion and until such time as the roadway, utilities and appurtenances have been accepted for the operation and maintenance by the Grantee but not later than . December 31 , 1987 -.. ..-' _'.._ •.- :. - FILED FOR RECORD AT Rt.-QUEST OF OffICE OF III CITY CLERK R&E-1 WON MUNICIPAL WI WO MITI AYE SO. • WON,WA OM '• • • • Said heretof ore mentioned grantee, its successors or assigns , shall have the right, without prior notice or proceeding at law, at such times as may be necessary to enter upon said above described property for the purpose of construct- ing, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstructing said roadway and utilities, or making any connections therewith, without incurring any legal obligations or liability therefore, provided, that such construction, maintaining, repairing, altering or reconstruction of said roadway and utilities shall be accomplished in such a manner that the private improvements existing in the right(s)-of-way shall not be disturbed or damaged, they will be replaced in as good a condition as they were immediately before the property was entered upon by the Grantee. The Grantor shall fully use and enjoy the aforedescribed premises, including the right to retain the right to use the surface of said right-of-way if such use does not interfere with installation and maintenance of the roadway or utilities. However, the grantor shall not erect buildings or structures over, under or across the right-of-way during the existence of such roadway and utilities. This easement, shall be a covenant 'running with the land and shall be bind- ing on the Grantor, his successors , heirs and assigns. Grantors covenant that they are the lawful owners of the above properties and that they have a good and lawful ri9h4o exe yte this agreement. and fi c t ' and and . and OD STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF KING - • 3 SS I, the undersigned. a notary pubyc in and for the State of Washington, hereby certify that on this/;' day of 19 ,G----personally appeared before me • and and ;j-`- ���z w fr-41 and and to me known to be individual (s) described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that signed and sealed the same as • u) free and voluntary act and deed for4ie uses and purposes therein mentioned. • jA 71, Wo ary ubl i cln an for tate of ashington, residing at • FiLLi htuuKti ti f REQUEST EST OF R&E-2a OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ASTON MUNICIPAL BLD6. M:�IJIY�11H 44.4.1 • EXHIBIT A That portion of Government Lot .16 in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1 /4 of Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. , King County, Washington, more particulary described as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of Rainier Ave. South (PSH No.5) and S. 7th Street; Thence N. 41-30-40 E. a distance of 120.2 feet; Thence S. 48-29-20 E. to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of Rainier Ave. So. a distance of 30.0 feet; Thence S. 41-30-40 W. along said easterly right-of-way line a distance of 21 . 1 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence along a non tangent curve concave to the northeast an arc distance of 38.9 feet to a point on a line that is perpendicular to the North 1 right-of-way line of S 7th St. said curve has a centeral angle of 81-00-06 and a center which bears N. 81-16-33 E. ; Thence along said perpendicular line S. 0-16-27 W. to a point on the north right-way line of S. 7th Street a distance of 1 .5 feet; Thence N. 89-43-33 W. along said north right-of-way line a distance of 33.8 feet; Thence N. 24-06-26 W. along the right-of-way line a distance of 12.4 feet to the easterly right of way line of Rainier Ave. S. ; Thence N. 41-30-40 E. feet along said easterly right-of-way line a distance of 17.8 feet to the True Point of Beginning. • • FILED FOR RECORD hT REQUEST OF OFFICE OF THE C!TY CLERK • R1HTON MUNICIPAL.BLDG. 200 MILL AYE.SO. R£N10N,1NA 94555 • . . • ..•• . . . 1 • • e-.:. ! . . . . . . I. • . . . , • . 6 . - : 1- . . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . , . 1 . . . • • • . . . i . . . i . . . . . . . 45, ''.. "4, i . :4. . . . , . • i —. .1J ....-C• 11 .......lii••••... \ e • ‘ . ' ...n."7 Gli .46,1 e,... LI, ‘...1 .-• \ . v . ....) . .• . • \ • . . \ .- . : • . . . / \ / . . .., , .,•• , t ...... . •:. ... • . .4, / s1.1\ • ....• a "i.'•.. :47\ • • • 14, i ' ' ILL \ 1 1. — ".'..1.,..tik Ifics. 9z 'L.-LS /b ' 4 ti Is. .4.....40;:7 1..1.1 VS 9-3 I'• I •„r: • '..1 -: 1 • 7. / ;' ,..a.-;-' . .-i -r .. ....S- C.-...... ....„.................., ...1-r tv I, • • . . 0,.g. - _ . 11. . .. • / -4 ---. . 4 • t- :"'/Y v )4 •:••• •••••1 A. 4.. .. i . I ...."_ . _ .. .... i scoff gctewooc - registered architect 10306 n.e. 10th street, suite 109, Bellevue, washington 98004, (206) 455-5549 6 i rAr;`a l`o,an_,1iiUtv4i.a Oily OFRENEON 7/17/89 pU`. '18 1989City of Renton �a E iif! E ERC lt� if 200 Mill ave Renton , WA 98055 atten ; Donald Erickson re ; ECF SA 057-89 Dear Mr Erickson , As per our recent discssion with you staff , we are requesting reconsideration of the first two items . noted as conditions to the Determination of Non-Significance . 1 ) We request futher information about the new curbing required on the corner . I have spoken to Clint Morgan and he said that the building dept . should have a redlined sketch that he did . We object to paying for what appears to be an error of design by the traffic dept . on curb radius , etc . . If this canilhown not to be the case , we stand ready to talk futher with you . 2 ) Sound Auto Stores has already paid $30000 for road improvements along 7th , etc . We feel it is totally unfair to recharge $18234 to Sound for a project that already falls within the Grady Way TBZ . We feel very strongly that this is double paying for work . We feel that it is important for good traffic flow and agree with all other conditions stated . It is our goal to not slow down the site plan process and wish to communicate freely at all times to come to a resolution of our mutual concerns . Please contact us at any time . S i n c e . e lN ,)4 441, Scott G Miller , architect cc ; SAS File • . NO'tt E`00-ENVIRONMENTAL j :: s; -:.DETERMINATION' ', AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION . ENV:,.. RENTON, REVIEW'TONMfL,e• .`�;t`; s•. RENTON,WASHINGTON' '�'��� '�' +,The Environmental Review Committee Audrey Benner (ERC).has, Non-; ,being first duly sworn on oath states :Significance Mitigated for:the,following pro,. that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the •Jects'unde� the..authorityioi.�.tFief;envon, Municipal'Code.', '' VALLEY DAILY NEWS , -89) < i3, ��-_ SON AUTOMOTIVE•(ECF;SA 043-8.9) ' ' af t$ : P "& �ai,t)n v<,.;'•. Applicant seeks site plan;approve' tar en'' • Kent Edition • Renton Edition • Auburn 'Edition approximately 10,00es gileie development. . live•service/retail sales office;development. Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week. That said newspapers The proNorth tu;i' ttr1ted'af271.Ramie'Ave �•.nue North:'iurf' �.;�r?'t:.��.r :;r't?}i.3CI` Vt {.gi1•" =SA-053RESTER pFFICEBUILDINGI(ECF ':' • are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ;SA-053-89)0:4, '`t1;,i,-,,,t ;i'i,;3f §fli;j•;�; months prior to the date .of publication referred to, printed and published Applicant,seeks"site;pion,.approve!„for. in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, Kingdevelopment;;of;::en:.,ildirg(wuttely:.7400 :; square„foot office building'(witFi,:surface. ., County, Washington. The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal and underground parking)onvacantprop. newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for 'erty in'the B&1:zone;'The property's focal-,':; King County. ed.on Taylor Avenue NW.between N,W.?4tfi„ .Street and NW 4th:Place: i-t4 i•,•..,:'i. SOUND AUTO(ECF;-SA-0S7;89) :fii,;• The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the Kent Edition .Applicant seeks site.pian`iapproval to level= ' , Renton Edition X. , Auburn Edition_ •Op anm/autrlorloe`_n to Conimerioashow- (and not in �roam/exterior'.lot)'in the''•Commercial•(B=i) •; supplement form) which was regularly distributed to' its subscribers ,zone on a�1,58•acre property:The'property,': during the below stated period. The annexed notice a 'is located at the northeast-comer,of Rainier,• ` Avenue South.and.South,Seventh,Streetw., BAKKE REZONE ECr-107-88) •, ;• Public Notice I ( ) ApplicatIoneZto0approvals7AoTalloW:WEMP. rezone from:P.1,;General.Use to.R-3;Resi-; `dentlel-Multiple:.Family'ar d.:B;1;Biislriessc„,4 was published on July 3, 1989 R5 2 6 5 1 t• Use;•2)a olot subdivision;;end.3),a,site A,.•plan,showing;a portieii.Of the site level ` • .;•dped,with`a�commercial developm `ent'with'•' • '.21;,;400,:square feet;and,the.•remainder;of';;;" The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the `,the site;'developed with.a 111'"unit multiple'' sum of$ 44 . 22 family residentiaVPcmplex.The,pioperty.;is ';,located on the south side of N.E.4th Street approximately 300.i.feet..east:of',Unio •,Ave. 1.y N.E. . •4 'V •'i,'t z•`.t.*,:•;a.:z: Pi This decision will be:finalized in 15 days.':" Written comments;received after 5:00.p.m:, ; July•18, 1989 will not be.considered. A 'fourteen.(14) day appeal period,wih com 19th. Mende following.the finalization of DNS-M.• • Subscribed and sworn before me this day of Jlu l yl 9 8 9 The.mitigation measures imposed:by the • City..of„Renton's.•Environmental•;Review:;'/ Committee;are available at the Planning;,,` Division'of)the Community-Development• Department ifMunicipel Building;'Renton;:." Washington?98055..Phone: 235-2550. '•j•.ti '' Published July.;3,+•1989,AV.alley, Daily News R5285' •l?r4 _, ter. .._...,,_ _:._ Nd ary Public for the State of Washington • residing at Auburn, King County, Washington . VDN 487 Revised 4/89 1 '. NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON Ai The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated for the following projects under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. MATHEWSON AUTOMOTIVE ECF; SA-043-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for an approximately 10,000 square foot automotive service/retail sales office development. The property is located at 271 Rainier Avenue North. FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-053-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. The property is located on Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place. _ SOUND AUTO ECF; SA-057-89 ' Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B-1) zone on a 1.58 acre property. The property is located at the northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. , BAKKE REZONE ECF-107-88 Applications for approvals to allow:l) a rezone from G-1, General Use to R-3, Residential-Multiple Family and B-1, Business Use; 2) a four lot subdivision; and 3) a site plan showing a portion of the site developed with a commercial development with 21, 400 square feet and the remainder of the site developed with a 111 unit multiple family residential complex. The property is located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 300 feet east of Union Ave. N.E. •. This decision will be finalized in 15 days. Written comments received after 5:00 p.m., July 18, 1989 will not be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal 'period will commence following the finalization of DNS-M. The mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee • are available at the Planning Division of the Community Development Department, Municipal Building Renton, Washington 98055,. Phone: 235-2550. Published: July 3, 1989 • • ., 4e!Io-) 4 CITY OF RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clytner, Mayor Planning Division July 3, 1989 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504 Re: Environmental Determinations Transmitted herewith are copies of Enviro nmental onmental Determinations issued on June,28,1989: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MATHEWSON AUTOMOTIVE ECF; SA-043-89 Applicant seeks site plan approval for an approximately 10,000 square foot automotive service/retail sales office development. The property is located at 271 Rainier Avenue North. FORRESTER OFFICE BUILDING ECF; SA-053-89 — Applicant seeks site plan approval for development of an approximately 7400 square foot office building (with surface and underground parking) on vacant property in the B-1 zone. The property is located on Taylor Avenue NW between NW 4th Street and NW 4th Place. SOUND AUTO 7—ECF; SA-057-89 I Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B-I) zone on a 1.58 acre property. The property is located at the northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. BAKKE REZONE ECF-107-88 Applications for approvals to allow:l) a rezone from G-1, General Use to R-3, Residential- Multiple Family and B-1, Business Use; 2) a four,lot subdivision; and 3) a site plan showing a portion of the site developed with a commercial development with 21, 400 square feet and the remainder of the site developed with a 111 unit multiple family residential complex. The property is located on the south side of N.E. 4th Street approximately 300 feet east of Union Ave. N.E. Environmental Determinations • July 3, 1989 Page 2 The fifteen (15) day comment period for these projects will end on July 18, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the City will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required 14 day appeal period. If you have questions please call Jeanette anette Samek-McKague or me at g 235-2550. cI • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator• DKE:mjp cc: Mr. Gerald W. Marbett, King County Bldg. & Land Division Mr. Gregory M. Bush, Metro Department of Wildlife Mr. Joe Robels, Department of Fisheries Mr. James L. Lutz, Department of Transportation • ' • • • . ; , i .•,;;;.•,. . , , • ; ENVIRONMENTAL . . ..il. ,,, • it. t.;• . . : DECLARATION • 1 . ., • . •,• •i). . .. _ . ,. . ; , ; APPLICATION NCECF-057-89, SA-057-89 ,: '• lc APPLICANT SOUND AUTO/SCOTT MILLER ARCHITECTS • " PROPOSED ACTIO • LICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP ' AN AUTdMOBILE DEALERSHIP (INTERIOR SHOWROOM/EXTERIOR LOT) IN THE V. COMMERCIAL (B-1) ZONE ON A 1.58 ACRE PROPERTY. is • GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS R:'.• j:: • NORTHEAST CORNER OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH SEVENTH STREET i • • POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS ( ' OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION. i'' c. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE t • I: • (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION li• ;. • DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE !IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. • • • AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ii.. ,• It • I I W14-L WILL NOT t' BE REQUIRED. • r, • THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS :.• ,; PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. • COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY •DULY 18, 1989• I` • AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY • BE FILED WITH THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., • • ; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON PLANNING DIVISION AT 235-2550. • ' ' DO NOT.REMOVE THIS NOTICE t WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. • • • r ; a.ti :yl , .4} ':,'1,„.:„..'-,.,.:.!.;1,'.,,,..,...-,: ':: . ,,.,•:'.,.'2.;.:.:.•,:.••,,,, ("b .�C. ' y•''' ':.']::.':•. : ^ir' . 'l' .8 1 1-,,:i'::!k'..;s.ykiN't ,q• I1 i .:'':,''"1-::..',7.-'':.'':•,:•'1..'.1::.',i..:,.('.''..':''Y,'::•:":'.. ''. ,' '•f.Ii'T:'.. 'E •," C'IZT'IG"I ,';' y 1< ,';.it,+''zEti 7 I x:• .1's. 'r,l)'l ,', Ilrt 1, t 'om_ �trP �a , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY .ME II'I •3 COPIES OF " CES ON OR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ONCONSPICUOUS ATTEST: Subscribed er,d sworn to Notary fubllc,,. ti end before in.. a !ji' r the Stet of tleshington resldln 1 �� • • on the �-Zt� cloy or ,S I GNEU :_ �Lch =':. a: . i ' . CITY OF RENTON y a r_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Planning Division July 3, 1989 Scott Miller 10306 N.E. 10th Street, Suite 109 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Sound Auto Rainier Avenue South/South 7th Street ECF; SA 057-89 Dear Mr. Miller: This letter is to inform you that the Environmental Review Committee completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above referenced project. The Committee on June 28, 1989 decided that your project may be issued a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, in advance of site plan review, that meets the Traffic Engineering Division's requirements for a modified curb radius along Rainier Ave. South at the corner of Rainier Ave. South and South Seventh Street. Also, the driveway on Rainier Avenue should be signed and painted for right-turn out only. These revisions are recommended to improve safety and the efficiency of vehicular travel along adjacent corridors. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.1.b) 2. That the applicant provide voluntary contribution for traffic improvements of $18,234.00 (253.25 trip ends,x $72.00 per trip for the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone) in order to mitigate traffic impacts to the site. 1 (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.1.b. and City of Renton Grady Way TBZ) 3. That the applicant be required to provide a plan for mitigation of construction impacts, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel washing of trucks on site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site;i and d) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of a site preparation plan and should be subject to approval by the Public Works Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau.(Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.1.b.) 4. That the applicant be required to post a $1,000 performance bond to ensure that the terms of the construction plan are met and the streets are kept clean according to City of Renton standards. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.1.b.) 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton. Washinaton 9805.5 - (7061715-7ccn • Scott Miller Sound Auto July 3, 1989 Page 2 Note: At the time of site plan review, staff will Probably recommend conditions including, but not limited to, the following: 1. That the applicant provide a revised landscaping/screening plan, which increases the number, size and species of plantings along the site perimeters, which improves existing screen fencing as appropriate, and which adds solid fencing along the northern perimeter, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts, noise impacts (to abutting residences) and light and glare impacts, as well as to provide defined site boundaries for purposes of crime prevention. This plan should be provided in advance of site plan review, and should be subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Planner. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.1.b. and City, of Renton Noise Level Regulations - 1101- 1105) 2. That the applicant be required to post a landscape performance bond in the amount of $3,000 to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the maintenance of plantings and irrigation systems to the satisfaction of,the City Attorney. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.1.b.) 3. That the applicant have in operation, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, hand-held paging devices rather than loudspeakers, in order to reduce noise impacts. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822; .E.l.f. and City of Renton Noise Level Regulations 8-1101-1105) Because the Environmental Review Committee imposed specific mitigation measures rather than issue a Determination of Significance, there is a required fifteen (15) day comment period during which comments are solicited from various agencies, jurisdictions or individuals who may have an interest in the Committee's decision. The comment period will end July 18, 1989. Following the end of the comment period, the Cityl will finalize it's Determination unless comments received require a reevaluation. Following the finalization of the Determination, there is a required fourteen (14) day appeal period.) Because Land Use Review for this.project has not yet been completed, staff is unable to establish fully detailed mitigation plans at this time. Staff urges you to contact the various City representatives, as appropriate, (e.g. the Public Works Department) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific mitigation elements which are likely to be recommended for this project. This information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and will enable you to. exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. In addition, by the end of the comment period, we(should be able to establish a tentative public hearing date before the Hearing Examiner, should a public hearing be necessary. • 1 Scott Miller Sound Auto July 3, 1989 Page 3 If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call our office at 235-2550 and ask for Lenora .Blauman or me. For the Environmental Review Committee, 1 ely, • Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator • DKE:mjp cc: Bob Bridge Sound Auto Stores 263 Rainier Avenue South, Suite 204 Renton, WA 98055 • • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST NO. : ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Sound Auto/Scott Miller Architects DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B-1) zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Community Development Department Planning Division The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 .21C. 030 (2) (c) . Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-2822 (D) Renton Municipal Code (see attached sheet) . These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-1117340 (2) . . Because mitigation measures have been imposed, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from ,July 3, 1989. Any interested party may submit written comments which must be submitted by 5: 00 p.m. , July 18, 1989, in order to be considered. A fourteen (14) day appeal period will commence following the finalization of the DNS. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee c/olDon Erickson, Zoning Administrator Planning Division Community Development Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA , 98055 -- PUBLICATION DATE: July 3 , 1989 DATE OF DECISION: June 28', 1989 I SIGNATURES: 7 -1 en N berg� Y/��- Lyn Gu tmann Y Community Development Director Publ c 'Works Director DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT: Sound. Auto ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NUMBER: SA-057-89 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial (B-1) zone on a 1. 58 acre property. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The property is located at the northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. RECOMMENDATIONS: The ERC recommends issuing a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated with the following conditions: 1. That the applicant provide a revised site plan, in advance of site plan review, that meets the Traffic Engineering Division's requirements for a modified curb radius along Rainier Ave. South at the corner of Rainier Avenue South and South Seventh Street. Also, the driveway on Rainier Avenue should be signed and painted for right-turn out only. These revisions are recommended to improve safety and the efficiency of vehicular travel along adjacent corridors. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. l.b. ) 2 . That the applicant provide voluntary contribution for traffic improvements of $18, 234 . 00 (253 .25 trip ends x $72 . 00 per trip for the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone) in order to mitigate impacts to the site. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4- 2822 - E. l.b. and City of Renton Grady Way TBZ) 3 . That the applicant be required to provide a plan for mitigation of construction impacts, including: a) an erosion control plan; b) a plan for wheel washing of trucks , on site; c) a plan for periodic watering down of the site;, and d) a plan for hauling routes and hauling hours. This plan should be provided in advance of the issuance of a site preparation plan and should be subject to approval by the Public Work Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. l.b. ) 4. That the applicant be required to post a $1, 000 performance bond to ensure that the terms of the construction plan are met and the streets are kept clean according to City of Renton standards. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E. l.b. ) Mitigation Measures Page 2 Note: At the time of site plan review, staff will probably recommend conditions including, but not limited to, the following: 1. That the applicant provide a revised landscaping/screening plan, which increases the number, size and species of plantings along the site perimeters, which improves existing screen fencing as appropriate, and which adds solid fencing along the, northern perimeter, in order to mitigate aesthetic impacts, noise impacts (to abutting residences) and light and glare impacts, as well as to provide defined site boundaries for purposes of crime prevention. This plan should be provided in advance of site plan review, and should be subject to the approval of the City's Landscape Planner. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.l.b. and City of Renton Noise Level Regulations - 1101-1105) 2 . That the applicant be required to post a landscape performance bond in the amount of $3 , 000 to be valid for a period of three years, to ensure the maintenance of plantings and irrigation systems to the satisfaction of the. City Attorney. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822 - E.1.b. ) 3 . That the applicant have in operation, in advance of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, hand-held paging devices rather than loudspeakers, in order to reduce noise impacts. (Environmental Review Ordinance 4-2822; E.l.f. and City of Renton Noise Level Regulations 8-1101-1105) mmdoc RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT c 4 / F ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET/�� i °� 9 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �olt � ),40 `' `9 DATE CIRCULATED: 6/1/89 COMMENTS DUE: - ,t_6115/89 �� ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA 1. 58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° ° 0 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water ° ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare 0 0 ° O ° ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° ✓ ° ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: -4oa adraLLIY Ot pC_opl_.e) "Shov2.i 'A G l --kVlvbu_� lk. �d ova efiuLi ,u_tr. q01 bra, c) p UN1 _ .. t� - 6A5A1 MU/ �a paxLuvi.q ow ow b v ukvtivoliv ait , 1 in v.Av1 kv\wwk O._.� �t (,(,3, �' In We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where 'tional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. / ao1411( Signature of Di :ect or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 • 1 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU lc POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE -PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED ✓ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED ram- -6_,kAc J k0/7-V-E. e___GLode-) o/\ p/ )kouu p) ,Li- p v v.c v \&,u_oLY. DATE O( I,l7 I SIGNATURE OF RECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 1 t RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Psas a+yy ,vv\ DATE CIRCULATED: 6 1 89 COMMENTS DUE:_61 15/89 ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: _Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA 1.58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth I ° 0 ° 2. Air 0 ° ° 3 . Water ° ° o ° ° 4. Plants ° ° 0 o ° 0 5. Animals ° O ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° ° 9 . Housing ° . ° - ° 10. Aesthetics ° I 0 ° 0 11. Light & Glare ° ° 0 ° I° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: ��,� Nei srff(`.. <ecir--- eia(/*('rrze2Wei % /AAc-6 rile7ec•/ Jeer ki re creeef-r-d o,. mama welook JUN211989 i RECEIVE* We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where ad ' ' n mation is needed to properly assess this proposal. 71/7 w... .� 1%G re /.r7 /96 ' Signat e of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 I RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE ARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TOITHE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989. REVIEWINGf�DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: �C�p � 1,L- /"tC'1%''Co�t APPROVED )( APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED G'Cli7,1-(ee,CiW o Gr P e l�l arT �- S ll�� G� tGl/t%.f /-0/ 7� l S )74 ZW1 P flee 0174 w( e /Qva0 e� O e f/ec .7GY-e7e.a074 DATE (�02G /,SrlMPF/ SIGNA OF ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 _ . e 4111 1 , 2 ,, RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . Lra.6 `J ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: -10r� e..se. usv-I 11111 2 v DATE CIRCULATED: 6/1/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/15/�fi 7 A c�Ni' a ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 tit* 'hoy ' PROPONENT: Scott Miller (46b 4949 PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto to BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA 1. 58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 0 o ° 0 2 . Air 0 ° o 0 ° 3 . Water 0 ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° ° 5. Animals ° 0 O ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 3. Land & Shoreline Use ° ° O O 9 . Housing ° ° ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° o ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° o 0 0 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15 . Public Services / 0 ° O ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: a i L. / e.A.E al�„�/�r �(//z 4-- ' 14./1 .-- -1 gam- -1.../. 4 ,/)7,-,..e,7Zie di," /.."-y.ife.7...,-d ez-- - We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 4 1-464e-1---Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Pf te . Rev. 6/88 lir RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) 1.: SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO1THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISIO APPROVED r/ APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED Any development and/or construction shall comply with current Fire and Building Codes and Ordi- nances. A -.- - -:-• eans of approved access is required. Fire Department access roads/lanes shall be paved minimum width 20'; minimum height 13' 6". Yes 'No Preliminary fire flow calculations show a fire flow of a7, 500 is required. _ hydrants with a minimum flow of gpm each is required. Primary hydrant is required to be within /5 ) feet of the structure. Secondary hydrants are required to be within .I DO feet of the structure. An approved automatic sprinkler system is required to protect the total structure. Yes, No All fire department access roads are to be paved and installed prior to construction. Yes All fire hydrants are required to be installed and approved prior to construction. Yes No DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED, REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 =� lir RCQU I RII) FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS , 1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION NAME , u.,t4 ,Q ® U.B.C. CLASS OF BUILD ADDRESS S'o '722r ' - 2 2,- ,/9e Ave- S. FIRE MGMT AREA 2. DETERMINE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION - CLASS (CIRCLE ONE): I - II IV III FIRE-RESISTIVE NON-COMBUSTIBLE ORDINARY W F MIXED (NOTE: IF "MIXED", SEE SPECIAL INSTRUCTION FOR AREA AND BASIC FIRE FLOW) 3. DETERMINE AREA: GROUND FLOOR AREA: FT2 (A NUMBER OF STORIES: • TOTAL BUILDING AREA: S 3Z9 ' ~- 4. DETERMINE BASIC FIRE FLOW FROM TABLE 01, USING AREA (A): A CD OOj GPM (B 5. DETERMINE OCCUPANCY FACTOR ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: - .1-6 0 GPM (C. IF LOW HAZARD, SUBTRACT UP TO 25% OF (B): IF HIGH HAZARDo ADD UP TO 25% OF (B) 6. COMPUTE SUB-TOTAL (B+C): CIF B+C IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) 1_50() GPM (D. 7. DETERMINE SPRINKLER ADJUSTMENT: ADJUSTMENT: GPM (E: (IF COMPLETELY SPRINKLERED, SUBTRACT UP TO 50% OF (D): IF LIGHT HAZARD OCCUPANCY AND FIRE RESISTIVE OR NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION, SUBTRACT UP TO 75% OF CD). 8. DETERMINE EXPOSURE ADJUSTMENT: USING THE TABLE AT LEFT AS A GUIDE, ENTER THE SEPARATION AND ADJUSTMENT FOR EACH OF THE "FOUR FACES" OF THE BUILDING IN THE TABLE AT THE RIGHT: SEPARATION MAX. ADJUSTMENT EXPOSURE SEPARATION ACT. ADJ. 0 - 10 25% MAX. NORTH 33 ' ADD /.. - $ 11 - 30 20% MAX. EAST /50' -'- ADD C $ 31 - 60 15% MAX. SOUTH • //' ADD Z ) % 61 -100 10% MAX. WEST /sr' ADD gD $ 101 -150 5% MAX. TOTAL % OF ADJUSTMENT 150 OR 4-HR WALL 0% MAX. (NOT TO EXCEED 75%) : .5-. (TOTAL % ADJUSTMENT TIMES (D) ADJUSTMENT: `I-- 75Z5 GPM (F) 9. DETERMINE ROOF AND SIDING COVERING ADJUSTMENT: • (IF SHINGLE COVERING, ADD 500 GPM) ADJUSTMENT: GPM' (G) 10. COMPUTE ESTIMATED FIRE FLOW REQUIRED: (IF D+E+F+G IS LESS THAN 500 GPM, INSERT 500 GPM) CIF D+E+F+G IS GREATER THAN 12,000 GPM, INSERT 12,0:0 GPM) Z U(D+E+F+G) REQUIRED FIRE FLOW: iS�� GPM (H) 11. SIGNED: '_ :,. .,•._ I:ATE V./...67,-.4-4- 4 49e ► r RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: iv-‘c.,c,•,rilen DATE CIRCULATED: 6/1/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/15/89 ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto et BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: _Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA _1. 58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° >C ° 2 . Air 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation X 15. Public Services 0 ° 16. Utilities X ° ° COMMENTS: {�A.y� VNl 1 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expert' se and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additionallin rmation is needed to properly assess this proposal. -. 16k)4 ‘t4 /rey Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 J RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S)�. : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: -ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TOI THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION:APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED MZt6A4T u. 6 tom M1- 4-1AL- 6NIL- 1 t t16-6 t Z c 12g>ll - DATE- I9 (44- ,SIGNA OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 1{-6G DATE CIRCULATED: 6/1/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/15/89 ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA _1. 58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants x' ° 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10 . Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation y ° 15. Public Services X ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: See attachment. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director. orrized Representative Late Rev. 6/88 Proponent: Scott Miller Project Title: Sound Auto 1. Proposed site located in the Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone. Traffic mitigation fee is as follows: Bldg. Area 5,329 sq. ft. Trip Rate 47.523/ 1,000 sq. ft. Code 841 Mitigation Fee $72.00 per trip generated 47.523 x 5,329/1,000 = 253.25 trip ends $72.00 x 253.25 = $18,234.00 TBZ Assessment Fee 2. South 7th Street -- First driveway east of Rainier Ave. South to be removed and replaced with sidewalk. (See attached drawing. ) 3. Rainier Ave. South -- First driveway north of South 7th Street to be removed and replaced as shown in the attached drawing. Curb radius to be adjusted as shown in curb cutback on drawing. • St` ^`+,/ ` a f`- hpY- r ' - - tt J '_ C., �- * • :, 141 tr + • 41- r Di'11t r+Cr"d 01- , rwM 41-1S'114r c1 L I.A '.$ 1 4 Ln..07 ---9or---a.d( • /SO' '� 1DI ' d : s J JI — 2lfolMs 4-6 t ( ' � � . f2,fi J r . • ' d ` 1( o t � St 11:. , I I...:',3.., NT $ % '1 11\\ ' .\/''f- /. V t34 4r) ) . - , 1 if . a ,r ova iti :\A4100Vg, binl5h� ? _ la '� 1 4:. . / . . t14. •?* '1;)\/ ,401/%,. .'0.4` gi; . . ... • . , . . .. . . . . . , .., . it... ...,..ro. ..ry r‘i 1 0 F * / •ttek x(* n ) \ .. / i''4. /p eti. i- .. •i' it ;�. tt'"}r`.�"�" - •w :�•�-s:/L , ' . • .i• / j\ N I vit 0 reic/ typ1/4/1' . . • . . ridit 0,2., .0 4 ../i .„/ /4-14. irnirri 01- te' 1 / I .t.....? .it CJ ' _ • i tr '� 4 i �A Cite' yr r..:ert_____I_ t =- / ,. . ! . • RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) 4 : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto - BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with .a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES. ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO] THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Tya ff E 9 rK e y- c%, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 1. Proposed site located in the"Grady Way Transportation Benefit Zone. Traffic mitigation fee is as follows: Bldg. Area 5,329 sq. ft. Trip Rate 47.523/ 1,000 sq. ft. Code 841 Mitigation Fee $72.00 per trip generated 47.523 x 5,329/1,000 = 253.25 trip ends $72.00 x 253.25 = $18,234.00 TBZ Assessment Fee 2. South 7th Street -- First driveway east 'of Rainier Ave. South to be removed and replaced with sidewalk. (See attached drawing. ) 3. Rainier Ave. South -- First driveway north of South 7th Street to be removed and replaced as shown in the attached drawing. Curb radius to be adjusted as shown in cur cutback on drawing. ' / " SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR 4UTHORIZEI REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 / W - / • ‘ ; 41N. /,:'9• , ,..jr.„,..)S7' Q t . _ .,. 14.-0,-, � p. • 5, , ,., .." .. . . ..„. ; ,,,„ . , .., ,, ) IP .- . .,. . -..; k---1. . : • . ... „ :::' '1;.:4'•;11-*17-;.47.71.-::::"- . • . ..• • V ''i ` • • :'� '1" ; . l'3".:•Pr: r to . \,‘,. ,.........,„,„„.„,„: . 1 . .... „..,,., , . ..„.,. .. . . .. ... . . .. . _ .•. . , /0 ire, 4. .. ei5fi•i� dru/@� .1 Ili si,f i ' tl Olt / > • \ario467 1., )1 -141 Ill SiiIi4 ''e % , "•••••...„ L. p. "4 0 ,. c, \ 0, - .._4,) 4:... ,........_.___...... .ann...mili opm•AY• S O U T O �Ti S'r �0 �r F�ss<<,� Ped a S-�r► a ti W►ov � 5i da - - '� 2 •cd 4-e P/et ' - -4 4117rtf.'illirl'', Ww W�rl+oli �F�41'To K P\ • �O s Y fy 74444•••• ••- •t. ` . .,firl �` •,• ,4 :5 .� a-`. srY.►� _ G' SS � fr "� •��{ •.c ,S•� �T.11 `+ 1 _.w RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,,a a DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET c' -"�'1 4 ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller•": , 436b PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto `;',t� BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot: LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: sK UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE f BACK FLOW PREVENTION LONG RANGE DEVICE(S) REQUIRED. SUBMIT CERTIFIED TEST RESULTS FOR EACH OEVICe PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: (4/2. `r y , /,,/es./o%.5,e./Atco APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED %MOT SEPARATE.,. SITE ?IAA CCivk 'URAw1a0 22n,344 !UTILITY APPROVAIOsA 54 owl N s- AUL. ileiSriI & NKOi>:Aw"u W rrlil N 300 FT of htGul aui -6114G LATE COMERS AMMO`S '= i �/® I Iv SNOW L6(gri6►J OC NEW �otirs. Se- at let1GAr WIPTErt. LATE COMERS AGREEMTarf-S 1 I O { SYSTEM DEVELOPS is t 1 . �E .' J..5 9g S 04*,FT X 600 D2 E' OA, 6o/•/2 _ ,3t SYSTEM DEVELo,....-..• « ..y:r 1�L0 `' " ��',,'9' // — �., �o/,I - SPECIAL ASSES SENT fitae.`i E:,.= ""-tiv±7.W2 11/410 � n U SPECIAL ASSESSMENT L ': :: ---- -so l) �: (�.c -d- = (O6' c'S 24 APPROVED WATER PLAN . N 0 9 c)0 D a-3 4 APPROVED SEWER PLAN No- if s io E S .We . ONLY APPROVED FIRE HYDRAE L C��u bv._9 YES y o FLUE FLOW ANALYSIS no p�'i,�..t ' Z.e t�,,6,4 .P 7dj Awl- 6DATE °1 /— ®'g 9SIGNATURE OF DIROR AU 0 IZED REPRESENTATIVE . REV. 6/88 6.-7-ra -29 A._ ir'_R lr RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: C,I-h I DATE CIRCULATED: 6/1/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/15/89 ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : . SA 057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto et BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: _Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA 1. 58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ° 3 . Water 4 . Plants ° O 5. Animals ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° 7 . Environmental Health ° O 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities V ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 0 .. (0- -- Signature o Director o A thorized Representative . Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT C ;1%o ENVIRONMENTAL�� -- 4t CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �ItYlnr) �� °'"r/ 2 498 DATE CIRCULATED: 6/1/89 COMMENTS DUE: 6/15L89� 9 ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom]exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street_ SITE AREA 1.58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° 2 . Air ° : ° 3 . Water ° 4 . Plants ° 5. Animals 0 ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° 10. Aesthetics ° 11. Light & Glare 12 . Recreation ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° 14 . Transportation ° 15. Public Services ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: \\ , \ Q O\' �. 'r ' 5 p of - w l 11 I�C r �✓e U t`G' DVS .° ?�"C dr fX si (a ac -Fit() i,1-0 (.a. 's We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. 6 7142 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date ( Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) I. : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th. Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION I SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: JTOYYYI Wocicy COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO' THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED V APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT. APPROVED A 3 b e (Qd o i ( I 6 wu be ,rC .krcz) ) - 11..54-s1/4)lei) 0 rNs 5(-a / i54 . /po -F r4.1�s sy✓L� b t ��c� �„6 c_13, �s 1 A/• DATE 41/7/3� SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR O�HORIZED1REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 • .. • III ,q,�� RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT L4N ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET ✓Otit , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: N ` DATE CIRCULATED: _6/1/89 ` COMMENTS DUE:_6/15/89 ei4�Of k® ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA I057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto 'BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: _Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA 1. 58 acre BUILIDING AREA (gross) :_r5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ° o ° 3 . Water ° ° . 4 . Plants ° ° ° ° ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° ° ° 11. Light & Glare , ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° COMMENTS: We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise an have identified areas of probable impact or are where addi ' nal informs n is needed to properly assess this proposal. Sign . e of Director or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: gZ_ ' . f�/41, APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 770 24/40 v'tf6 Cd�� /62,6,Z_ 14" G/ DATE — " 7 SIGNATURE 0 'RE T RO OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 TON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN` EPARTMENT f,-710,44s t ' c ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEE3, OP,94Ni, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ce-44-1, ,fi 1P6 r\wi Z In DATE CIRCULATED: 6 1 89 COMMENTS DUE: 6 15 89 dif 89 ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1.58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA 1. 58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° o ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° ° 7 . Environmental Health ° ° o ° ° 8. Land & Shoreline Use ° o ° ° 9 . Housing ° o ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° o ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° ° ° 12 . Recreation ° o ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° o ° 14 . Transportation ° o ° ° 15. Public Services ° o ° ° 16. Utilities ° COMMENTS: 0 RECOlry)pleN10 r� We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. O _"_,--,,. i--, uvv-NEL, co a I5 .,m Signature of kbxector or Authorized Representative Date Rev. 6/88 R_ ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-057-89 PROPONENT: Scott Miller PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION HORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989 . REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: l`JL4R15 f I'bgalUdti5 b bno4 APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED YID NI-N\ D<AP P IKgut P1 CoeOEO Opus 0ivvtC1QSIOA) c I2J/2 ' X ZO €10 co yvvvIEND tv-Noyr puvo-teR. tio Ilk) On,0e& ST-RaiUd° 3U Odk_ w Vrld 11 NkIGLi-r .ingo C \)O\1'tON L:rtJO I\ O3 TO 13V R-65rOft.Go . DATE Co ' 1? ft SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ,,��� ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHEET o".1 ,'k1 '94%4,04,t, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: n1 ,, �� 4, ,,,4,. DATE CIRCULATED: 6/1/89 COMMENTS DUE:_]15/89 % ,`28i9 PLANNING MW k ECF 057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) : SA 057-89 CITYoF8gp e® PROPONENT: Scott Miller JUN 1 1903 PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas statio and parking lot. LOCATION: _Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street SITE AREA 1. 58 acre BUILDING AREA (gross) :_5329 sq ft aprx. IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PROBABLE PROBABLE MORE MINOR MAJOR INFORMATION IMPACT IMPACT NECESSARY 1. Earth ° ° 2 . Air ° ° ° 3 . Water ° ° o ° ° 4 . Plants ° ° o ° ° 5. Animals ° o ° ° 6. Energy & Natural Resources ° o ° 7. Environmental Health ° ° 8 . Land & Shoreline Use ° ° 9 . Housing ° ° 10. Aesthetics ° ° 11. Light & Glare ° 12 . Recreation ° ° ° 13 . Historic & Cultural Preservation ° ° 14 . Transportation ° ° 15. Public Services ° ° 16. Utilities ° ° ° COMMENTS: -'-7-' .� y � Cam-2V,' ;eEjt . f t' i O- x-- + s �� �( ./ C ���`9'7 -e— d e_ �— . „-er..0-Li e?/-2_0:_o___. .5 _, 1.--20:- .,._-.6g____ex c2,--Z-e_, „,.--c-t_-_-_ c.ac-_:____-,-._e_---er---_er--„_____4___, 97.ea>„.....d.--12...e ..)01--e_____ 7--fl-e- .c„-- ..„,d---46-- ee2‹ . _,,-6-1!, e,-. ._ze--)___a_d_d_____-- ,e__e__- We have reviewed this application with p aticular attention to those areas which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or are where t 1 information is needed to properly assess this proposal. LLL Signature of Director oi( Authorized Representative Date Re . 6/88 RENTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET PLANNING DNISION ECF-057-89 APPLICATION NO(S) . : SA-057-89 CRYOFRENTON PROPONENT: Scott Miller JUN 1 1989 PROJECT TITLE: Sound Auto RECEIVE• BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Applicant seeks site plan approval to develop an automobile dealership (interior showroom/exterior lot) in the Commercial zone on a 1. 58 acre property which is presently developed with a gas station and parking lot. LOCATION: Northeast corner of Rainier Avenue South and South 7th Street TO: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE: ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG. DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE: UTILITIES ENG. DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION SHORT RANGE LONG RANGE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OTHERS: COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING. PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TOTHE PLANNING DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BY 5: 00 P.M. ON JUNE 15, 1989. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED /er-t. e.>/2- --/—efi— 6aJr(4e7e4, 7-`" --' r-i4L.,,e,..<-; DATE SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REV. 6/88 s - OF RED � o O U \% © Z NOTICE o • 90 �' 0,9„o sEpit.„ • OF PENDING • SITE PLAN APPLICATION DES CRIPTION :SUN.• AUTO ECF; SA-057-89 APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP AN AUTOMOBILE • • DEALERSHIP (INTERIOR SHOWROOM/EXTERIOR LOT) IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONE ON A 1.58 ACRE PROPERTY WHICH IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A • GAS STATION AND PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: NORTHEAST CORNER OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 7TH STREET • PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : o ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW o SITE PLAN APPROVAL o BUILDING PERMIT • • • PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTIME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS ANb .:; PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION • CERTIFICATION Mom SnY/Pj HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF IE ABOVE DOCUMENT WERE POSTED BY ME IN CONSPICUOUS _ACES ON UR NEARBY THE DESCRIBED PROPERTY 'ON• '' • • ATTEST: Subscribed end sworn to before me, a ` 1' Notary Public, In end for the State of Washington �' • residing to _AJ--c on the day of9LL,m_t_Lasj ,SIGNED : L .. • OF R4, c CL Q z 11N1 c3TICE a o 'co sEP1 ` P OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPLICATION DESCRIPTION : SOUD AUTO ECF; SA-057-89 APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP (INTERIOR SHOWROOM/EXTERIOR LOT) IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONE ON A 1. 58 ACRE PROPERTY WHICH IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A GAS STATION AND PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS: NORTHEAST CORNER OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 7TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS REQUIRED : o ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW o SITE PLAN APPROVAL o BUILDING PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE RECEIVED BY THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ANYTPME PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS Ail[ Di1��.e► � ; PUBLIC HEARINGS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CALL THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 235-2550 THIS NOTICE NOT TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION AM II. • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON,1 WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: SOUND AUTO ECF; SA-057-89 APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP (INTERIOR SHOWROOM/EXTERIOR LOT) IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONE ON A 1.58 ACRE PROPERTY WHICH IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A GAS STATION AND PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 7TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. 77- L. 9O /fix II i, re W III •i, _ J I hi �� aW _ .�I p-r. • .A I - °� 7= ST. 7 la., 5�, tail ifl• ` @. ‘ LIMIT \ w j l AY . / /\ G RApY W ! 1 -�EHM,_ I • Q � , I N _ _ Ifi , I S RENT.N vh--Auc FL• �`_ i.`4; ImoA1 N. : R D8EMN SO9IN 9 11. r __ .... __________ • • • • - • -i / 4re' . tv - -z ;12 . I F / 1:4 / el I i'40 r.4, - Zig./is' _ to ,, 44.4a. . , , ,/e • ,t ., + I T.E01"1E41.1.. : I i • -/4 /(- ------- -1-\ 4* 1 I . I (. — 1 - „ • v "341..;:. 51.Se \ 13 • ' .4 44. 0's rt. • (.--- 0. \\vs,. rl'k, '. i X i b 1 I .. 1 I 1 : . i) i'\ 7 I -3 • at --.> • ' ii E • 1 7-, V / • iC.N. il•4, • .••-•\,• v *5'4 1 . # # Tr. r • •t^ ' / Xt. • : 4 . •' 4i.e ?....fr / f"." ... -..... / . 1.; . _ v 4, . . '`‘. 1 • ,,,:.\) . / / '/ C. r. ;II- II ••• L. 4 I•!". i. • I . . /7.,)..1. ' --‘,,f .... • . 1 - 1 .? 'I *.a .• • I - 41 rt:__73. .i.lik_ A--- --_.1 _&_t_.1 .a_..1-1- -- - E • _ _ __ . ., r ev"..- e s, ( i 4.• ,'" i • Wierlo ) 4 a . At .....) a 1 a• .,.. . o • / 141. 3.334 ii ..-- 1-- I• r A. • 4.•• a - l• # ,6.,•4(ns* 4 4 l,i_ / . ... ff: • ./.......) .. • _,..4..,,P,f - • ...- • . ' %. . ( <---- / 'If 1. \ i • .2?: tit 4 • ' Cd e-t.. t:ficraf....) ,,4, -• , , i ,,,.. i , CL-111....b.3. 311., 1. • • t. —4. , Mk. • • , 1.1•P: '- i' • ‘ 1 1 rla Ma-CtO.4.•1'2' I • \\ . It `No* EASnly : aVie• , ti • ) i___:.i.e.....b -..___. I VA,1..3.4 II • 4 - rcriovau -1 3 71 . A, *AT= I •3 - fAll 3 lAwrro, IV 93I'L 1.461411 Iry iziF MOW . i ' /4 ta___...le!.\__ ---7.-t, .'. + ' .1. . 40- , -1. • . : • - 4. A.• -3". .../. - .±..._•._ At A. II. G \•• P e i e 11..4 6 A i 70/4 I .... 4. .1* •• A. • .0:4 4 CIA. 3N 4 3 o IL L•I A- L.4 S SAW.-A' - . .. . .. .- •s. : 'or- " A. In A. . '-' 4.'4141.41- -. ' - . _. __• 1 _ \ t veer c.•••••AAN(4,44) • .... A ;;I4 ce .5 o LI -r FI "rol 5•7 P.G s.--T -z • 4—itc...-.67..- 14. • _ . - ' ' - . . t - \ WM! —SA.SITZ $1643•44 4 3,3103.03.4, E4-niLe 4 rrE 1430,6 r419710 4 , le 044.1.1 g"Wk. &rm.,...4-, 44.140., ii.:, i.roos....f114%, i. .Se)u lb °ups. •c4rie... rot...11146. .1• wr al?,or., i g G 14-1-4:4.1, 'w,r,..c.a.1 • 6,111,44.1aL 1,61-tvg I 111.01.0 71"1 _,' ..- 1111 . -._____ - -- - - . I 7 -,6,,,TT_4_,rilL,,,ce,_ ce,,,w .5r11,,i,, ___ . ____ _ _ __ 1301.44-vdi i41. litos .t.j_ r,.....,oril.q.n.,, -.4,14 ii-Lo-p-- .....wma*mom&• CU 4ris sdgael--)4,,,r , cxori-oi:--7 ,s` 1. 0: • CITY OF RENT'°`N FILE NO(S): Si--0 - 6, E; l't .d,JILDING & ZONING DEPAR'. ...ENT M- -. 161-139 ..IL � . .ft‘NrcO MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of applications) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) APPLICANT I I TYPE OF APPLICATION NAME 6oOto ®LDS / cNTi/ / Mc FEES ADDRESS�J//^_ , �� CD REZONE*(FROM TO ) G 69'- I2ki i'l la. AVE S, 5 c!;le 204 SPECIAL PERMIT* CITY ZIP TEMPORARY PERMIT* 1 J S N m Y`t4 / + I A /fiv QSS �®-y CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* �' O,00 TELEPHONE` SITE PLAN APPROVAL / t's/,ndSi, Q SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 9-n '35 7 67,5 > 4-7 0) No. of Cubic Yards: CONTACT PERSON Q • VARIANCE* . From Section: NAME • * Justification Required S gin- ?LiILw1 2 -/ G7' 4 ADDRESS In //'� C� SUBDIVISIONS: I v'30 U vie `�✓ o( fe /Q I Q SHORT PLAT CITY ( � (.4k /� fa. �p Q TENTATIVE PLAT v �� / ►/�f"� /a. 004 Q PRELIMINARY PLAT TELEPHONE ® FINAL PLAT 4ss.. sG 4 I q WAIVER (Justification Required) 'OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME y� y PLAT NAME: S ND A p�rO 5 I-/y� ag ADDRESS�J �j� /� �j// �)/' PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: ' f- 3 A// �+'I 1,:)z '�)C , d�°.1t f:'Zo`I. PRELIMINARY CITY ZIP a FINAL R °i ( IIl-1A (5 P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE "..UQ a2404C 9- '1 � '3 -7 ( ' -' - 47ov) Residential ® Industrial t a Commercial Q Mixed LOCATION MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS �i� Gorier 12-A1NIm Ave-, S f2-Cwtoi_i ED TENTATIVE (24217iiiil . f, l 516 Wit Gass MI EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING PRELIMINARY (Pil S1}g"7()J4 /pAQJc l,H/Ga Lo7 3- I ED FINAL PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: G O u;2 ci,"ip St4014i-aarq it L.or NUMBER OF SPACES: 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE qD,O 0 • SQ. FT. ACRES '-` 4 AREA: ® d 1 �-3 TOTAL FEES ISO, 00 STAFF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING•DATE STAMP tlINI\IIlb;e Di VISION APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: wp CITY OF RENTON APP I TION DETERMINED TO BE: 11 MAY I ® ' 1989 Accepted 6'r..61, f ECEPVE _J . Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: f a 5c1 APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: COI ® Accepted Q Incomplete Notification Sent On By: (Initials) ROUTED TO: .ttl Building 0 Design Eng. 0 Fire gl3 Parks IJPolice ElPolicy Dev. l Traffic Eng. Utilities REVISED 1-31-84 Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). AFFIDAVIT , being duly sworn, declare that I am authorized representative to act for the property owner,Downer of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS /56 DAY . OF it4/3-y 19R'9. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, RESIQING AT (Name of Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) Grty o /eo-x-7/-er lo3ap e 1'54% sulte-toi (Address) (Address) 9Uc WAY . .?8 (City) (State) . (nZip i 455 (Telephone) Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." Form #174 DESCRIPTION That portion of Government Lot 16, Section 18, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., King County, Washington, described as follows. . Commencing at the South quarter corner of said Section -18; thence N 89*17137"E along the South line thereof, 815.25 feet; thence N 1°18' 53"W 190 .55 feet; thence N 73*38112"E 180 . 75 feet; thence on a line parallel to and 150 feet Westerly of the centerline of Shattuck Ave . as shown on Smithers 5th Add, to the Town of Renton, according to plat recorded in Vol ..:16 of Plats , page 33 , said King County, S 0°16119"W 24.48 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 0*16' 19"W to the North margin of S. 7th St, ; thence- S 89,'17137"W along said North margin to the Southeast corner of a triangular tract conveyed to the City of Renton by deed recorded under Recording No, 7204270475; thence Northwesterly along the Northeasterly line of said triangular tract 12.5 feet, M/L, to the Easterly margin of Rainier Ave . S. ; thence Northerly along said Easterly margin to a point which bears N 89°46128"W from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence S 89"46' 28"E 286 .00 feet, M/L, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SUBJECT TO power line easements according to instruments filed under Recording Nos . 1676184 , 3207080, 3664559 , 3378930, 3664560 6, 3429774; (A portion of above easement filed under Rec. No. 3664559 was releasedfrom said easement by instrument filed under Recording No. 7902090718) ; AND SUBJECT TO utility and storm sewer easements as filed under Recording No . 7307020338. r 0 1989 ° . _ scoff gatewooc miller - registered architect 10306 n.e. 10th street, suite 109, Bellevue, washington 98004, (206) 455-5549 • 2/1/89 • Renton Building Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Sound Oldsmobile/Pontiac/GMC site plan approval Dear Building Department Official: Sound Auto Stores has secured a long term lease of the property on 'he ham " corner of Rainier avenue south and 7th street where there was an exis- ting car dealership lot and gas station. They propose to build a one and one-half (1i) story car dealership showroom on the corner where the old Mobile station existed. They propose to increase landscaping and beautify the existing parking lot and street perimeter areas. • No major new area lighting is proposed and signage would follow Renton codes. Existing signs would be updated. We look forward to starting this project in July '89 and complete con- struction in September '89. • Please feel free to contact us at any time. Warm egards, Scott G. Miller Architect PLANNIV\r, Cif Ui i_f f ill\I D MAY 1 8 1989 [) OF R4,'1f ECF: I 65-7-e9 `' t$ z City of Renton LU: L5 °57 -B9 o � I9A0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST o94TE SEPTP Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print Legibly) Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: oL. - rJ OLos1410 1 ,f tr,K.Yri kr- /AC (4/1 E1-10+^)/7-op 2. Name of applicant: sou N+0 ftv-1-o s � 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Covet = cGdl'( W1ILLen. AIL C,ht•e'r5 (od (OW' Io' , W.t.-vae, Wk 1 8 c* 4. Date checklist prepared: I 29 S. Agency requesting checklist: 12 -1,4*oH 619 . 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): N1�11PICa Dl\I!`'Dt�1� (o►n r4wo{,CH Jo I 1 1 flQ)`I C,V 1-‘) REINON >'1NAn. 3,1 0C1 1 sw,1 193 Sb 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, :... ..'urther activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. ;` 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or willi, be prepared, directly related to this proposal. NoN- 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes. explain. s� plow O7 /4✓pI NONE C4 /44 pcnnIT • 10.. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. if known. tlY1 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. . CO05IYLUL't104.) or A 11/Z S5yey Gkiz. /0 nitt, ccyz-.5N 91 O W rz-ao m — y L s U o f fah! ��� i7LI • �5 j�R-ka Gl LoT Lo T Lo-I— s J e Z a 1-4 1/4 C1 (b -I A S1-to w 2-0 041 5 S 37l S I 7o not.. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description. site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably•available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. H Coe.,.)f.res aF rzA- i Avc s, - ` L)c G —fro -iii►v or-- Caov, !.a r (c. 1 6cZ-r7 "' l '�, Imo Z 3 M /Lf}►� G S t� /mac- wi B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one);410., rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous. other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? IIZ To c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils. specify them and note any prime farmland. J Grey sil{- -1-0 -�o ' fa �jo U ev, rn$e. s ,avert d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate . vicinity? If so. describe. No - 2 - e. Describe the ose, type, and approximate quar es of anyfillingor • PP grading proposea. Indicate source of fill. NoNe - W E W ILL, u sE ca►uc-. r-,- Faow-k, • f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Hn g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? eultdoimi 4 s iattAt-T o o o/a h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: NOt4 - E e pr '+ott-4 / s.ta r�zu w 0� pLiu hi ,2. 50- 5 - /d — - YL l 5 11 I-Gl� 4- 4 Ittr !ems 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, Industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. c Mt it /.i (Z m p1, 't 0 /9- Pi- r� b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? NO c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: NO fie 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) • . Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. • Na , 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. - 3 - I F1t 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdt o..als or diversions? Give T; general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? .If so, note location on the site plan. J0 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn. or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description. purpose. and appaoximately quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems. the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. -- SI`fie Gi aokS 4-0 t 'fit I e/wc2. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of this and disposal,ill this water(include quantities, if known). Where flow into other waters? If so, describe.will this water flow? Cj(l 511/461 C4'YGtf 44iNS 6 N co 7' _ WCcJ 04wN spoor-; 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No - 4 - { 7/ d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, gi id, and runoff water impacts, if any: �o NE - 6-x c&pt es i 5.0/45 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other q/evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other LY Shrubs o grass o crop or grain- o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass,.milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? No NG _ e- w :11 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 14645 d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: / 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other 9ko Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other �v b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Po NC c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. NdNE - 5 - d. Proposed moa.ures to preserve or enhance wildlit_;-yf any: PONE Own 5 144 4/AK 4u, 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. 6 45' u r//i-ig.. £04,01 7-16/4/0.49 • b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: W 19eifd c irr cot, Y Boca 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including 'exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. HOArc 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Aid HE b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? _ L'- c t LX� 7 G ndlJE JUO�� � to s �z��1 - 6 - 2) What types + levels of noise would be created or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. s a / yJ " rI r/✓t PiJ'v✓1 � J Y tf 1 GA f t 1 S G - fr-rLl 4"111 04t, f'f'!-`►.1 - Jlla x/C C r Err C-Iffe-s (t_v r✓rV j a-re, 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Flo/e — cR-cep 1 c - "vt s c--11y0c 4 .i ff 5 f to-%y.14T, L--�1 51- S/DOE /-z M) I/ 'i 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? LOT y G 4e7 5 Y' -110 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. oLn ZOo rp 5t41/04 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? S Yilm E /leg 496 VC e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 6-/ g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? /C/ /4 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?. If so, specify. n/O i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? /0 / S j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? /V OHE' k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: NdHdr - 7 - v 1. Proposed r. 'sures to ensure the proposal is c- 'aatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: jLLOw 4t,L hour-NI) • eurr-,or,,ly c4,0e3 A::. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. HdNC b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. N6/4E c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Na/ 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Zoe hick S-f-ucca s►drh, - Jr,. .rndf;.�y — y RSS b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: SCE ES lc,y/ — 3vruo/Hel I s a wC S�v►'�-y e 610 #1- s[-a,o ES . 6/9ck y-av� 05 T Y-0 TZ✓d St-env 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? /c/d/k/ / G tile,re7 i S ?L7/V r-et.) b. Could light or glare from the finished project ,be a safety hazard or interfere with views? ,9 — L o/Y75 7 Z' Fite— yj S i? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? n(OC" d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: See, t4 b " r /4/A5 .'E12 , J ffrz,ov rvo &3)L Th72 toot - 8 - 4 12. Recreation ,:•i. a. What designated . and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A/d Ne b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. NONE c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: PONC 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. /2/11/'t ltn AVE SOur1t g -7 vti / Erv)ry/ej .l r 7`b /2-Ai&le7L Z cn/hzj /E3t I r 5 )`v 7 Y+ b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? GO f c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? , a S Q t /F1 1-/ 519/DES Y- / IgsG P': MIS APP2o x 5 -5 Ok0 S1 '-' Ler d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe , (indicate whether public or private). v f t— r b41 ld ✓.t) - 9 - . • e. Will the pr t use (or occur in the immediate' inity of) water, rail, or .. air transpor.ion? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 74-0 — 4144-t- 4:2.yy g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: / i/AJC' — rv►e 7 I c y I$-Gc,e_x 4-'27 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. iIO b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. Utilities a. Circleututiliti rrently - -• -ble at itie.... te: .: atural c-as. er, r sd serve t. eras anitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate�vicinity which might be needed. vl Pdw �^— wask ot4-- g a� G ova / / S . ck!A./t. , C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-sig ficance that it mi ht issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any w lful misrepresent i n or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. kiq Proponent: 1 Name Printed: 6caT 6. 0/l uL - fit T 'SL'fOLZ-voZL Alv -- -t-- ��9 c21 0� �+ ;.: — t .1S N L G. ,' / / " giCt "- �;.ti _ , , .6.F... • - -(L� zo t� - - �.�• 'B1Lo6ozobL:d/r a� i ;.:. . -ntr� a ;ISO-� • 0 t '' , a7'.�.l�+Y/alw ag 17Jifr . (I ., . _ i / ,, V 94,2.1.87 Ag 090979dr 1t9sb3S'3 . - * 1I =..:;�. l �*`t, �F (,iragw2s'm�r 9r!' '. `r jii i7 i7 3�ur ' j % kl N k 'II I , 1 1 Z /Y.I ' �c '0 ,JJ�ti 4, ,� -.J I (Xi/095.DIC1628', .° owl, 7 b-1e1 I), 4 11 b> 1 e4C i \ 11 ' i . .5 .�y/ -43-1 . ) 411��, / ,0 ch k c, (caTti..77-47a' ..7g )0i tn . I -...b,.. ,j tie----...1ws3 ),,Lilkin ,O1 % ,. ,U++iS3 aalf+$S lW?JQ15 1StX3 r-.£_ '1,D, �; 1 r1 ,3 .08j i- - / ,i ' ii+0L� ,pz, . .0 i '1 a1 (-M4 01 dVwnSSb LLa1M9 1 ( 1. mil ' t),,I�d -t `Air,92,917„68TY SoYSBZ -- -- , q CI) N1 • i ® 0CNI ,n eN !l e -�� / c ,�- �". , Ar 1---"44 •-ri G.-, A \'cl ,,0 .43 03.., ,_,, C - . i Ut - ° w 14 /!4Z -1 'V Ottti 74 Cr) 4 . Zy r:I r,/vS CI''soa 0 .o .. . , • . to 4 -_ . .. . twetEt_i ; .41 •-•-•••••••• ••••• •••••'w n - . E.%1 hr IN 4 • •••-''. AUP/7,, • d . • - ,‘:',A : Ll WI 3- . ...), ,e+, ,,,,..•.... , . _Tiffsigi --1 1 ! A . . ---r‘oft s T. •. , .- 74./...- - -4130-ji, -,.......-___rt. 1 r I 0 6 Atvit 1 . . :',1,-. ' 71 . C4-4,2 6.Z.S 14e /. . . I , . ED Neicturrili____ _12" zoo' • PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON ,. M AY 1 8 1989 ..9 9 u i •.. . . .... . . . . .. . CITY OF R-7ENTON ...•,-.--.. f.- ...-"—.7''',. milk 7 11:-.1_,..,.,_:. ...._...1:;,.,..:.".:,...,.:.,..,,..4......kfi;,-,..,........-_,;! .; -.. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT i jtiN 2 'S9 ) ,.;'!-Tg-`....;':3-:F. i 1::r= )" ',A/ , • - - -,L 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 - . i --- --, ..,i ie '..-,- ---ei', I 1 : Y. R-. .,..,• 1.-7r,-,,,,'•0'47:,?,-, ii.iFfY;;,. 7:'.,"i 'M L,'•:,.A"''"'''' '''' - ' .gt,YME, .,•,,,,,..,,-a ,,,b..e,Xe, (9 ;;TF.A:7`.fit,,,' ii',:•0 '11:-,,AP N-,,A (p41 SPrkliTucAL r9-0,- utoligi ,,,,,v1.. • NOTICE OF PENDING SITE PLAN APPROVAL RENTON, WASHINGTON A Site Plan Application has been filed and accepted with the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. DESCRIPTION: SOUND AUTO ECF; SA-057-89 APPLICANT SEEKS SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO DEVELOP AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP (INTERIOR SHOWROOM/EXTERIOR LOT) IN THE COMMERCIAL ZONE ON A 1.58 ACRE PROPERTY WHICH IS PRESENTLY DEVELOPED WITH A GAS STATION AND PARKING LOT. GENERAL LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF RAINIER AVENUE SOUTH AND SOUTH 7TH STREET PUBLIC APPROVALS: o Environmental Review o Site Plan Approval o Building Permit The application can be reviewed at the Planning Division located on the third floor of Renton City Hall. Comments will be accepted anytime prior to Public Hearings, during Public Hearings, or prior to an administrative site plan approval. For further information on the application or dates of final action by the City, please contact the Planning Division at 235-2550. - ��� / r I I r-- I — _.. — �. o fY �I vJ �. _, 4. a1 I . I k ` �. 1 J 1 , . N .I S. (o Tur_.5.7 NL ..:, • aW e of 7:,,, ST. .. ,4,\0; I li - . o 7T~ ST / j If 4 _ . N \ • • 1 / JECTLIJ LIMIT \ Q ,--- ,--) a �� 4 ii / ) I_ ,. • / �JL GRApY �IAv k \ �/ I 1o_-- .__— Vii.L446f: I - fi N _------ .___--L:.:7„"_.______y PLANNING DIVISION i-1411 .2.-----TNN., __..-------- I n MCIY 8 O°N8 9 • 1 - `i1l�c C" y31'111 1'7 l '!-. 1.+f+�. rnt -- l m...•• tail 1 K ._:aa+a Mot .L -_ • ...___..... ._. N....i175 .•NW/WI 11P tIMM/: 7.am vrryary — 7� f r e'A i M.—I-r e a ',rod)",is I. Jn.ld bd • ''y'I1.ro•l :1.1"/• 5d'10 Q 11 R OG 1 'b.uJ.>,s Gr+f" '!t7 '�iu+� •+7v.,MJ ,•sn1.7 M ' J .i . ' TtHUU/'l w1i SU* 314+0 +n'Ilww > >♦•n•n u1♦ nP ` l ' rr►) — 2- I 1JvbLS '.r.L NL ncS .° 7MivP,,]c I. A c1. 1 .T.•......... V� u . -+.N•CSf+ ti r1 7r 1 1 4 .••/ ll iQ . Y 7 - , h►•r Ufa /J 4y/ -, • lrl/1 7V ( ♦ LM�LI?� • �'1 pre.,tYp • ) pi i.: Mi \. .. ....\ /4" i \ . �P yy, • rl..•rrl•►., • I it rZ • ,- y • ', • -} - - - t, y___ — I•1 ' 5' ., / A ,r Ili! / i T:.: r ___..1— I ._______F_.. I Ile I— iii\earl' \ /d' le 1. 4_____ 4., . • $' .1 7 ,, /I 1 • ', 1 /'I i /...-\ ' :•1. • f 'T _ 11 j w\i `' ' 2 0 �� I- .- ( , ?. .".:0'-' /1" __,_— — ) . . . Pc • )41 D . ... ,• .,, Cr,Ta • • 4IV .. [7 .,,, ..z, .,,, _.. . J ..,;I . . AIM ' / 1,1 I 7 it ST. 7 TN T �I - - / co PROJECT / i � : I j LIMIT \ {� a .% ,,-7. iz . ,Q - -r...,::_„----- - - q...(/) • Y 2Y -�,R A \ J' lik 1 AI .• -�-- - is �i ��)�� - . � o N . ,__._ .----- YU_ i Ai 6f: . vi S. REur�N Vi LAGE p� �� PLANNING DIVISION .0 . / CITY OF RENTON . ,\--5) p n.r fj DI c r U Q � -~ Uu � r- `\ � ' �-__- �p -/ • 0¢I_di . I-0;, // J / .., ,. . .._ ..... -1- • . _...., . . , . ,,,, .,, . ,. ti • ., _ .7.._ 73, , . ., .. 0 -i-...../. ...-...........-........ . : • • �_ - - o / F / f—1 { �11- i / c A ' • / `bra / ZIP • � c GW'4 C4c'-C12 1 O� 1- -Ti J Ca LJLJ ne,.1 ' pt / — • // !/) ; I r wane l / / i. I -J' / / uox. I ua a cw� �� r 1 L "jI :"� `� - • q^+44NNING DIVISION • CITY OF RENTON . [D,..l. - - - - - -- - D MAY 18 1989 . E t 7 11 V E k.1_...) „i-,,a 5,1-u)I I )I 13'-,,M ,au,..„) dux,1 p1rJTuc.IG9 P1� —I'-- ' • - - -- - r - I g14101-. 3-.00 1 ---- 82-d ` F1S:-H45 0 ...Mono..: )�DRAWN. o-..: all1pI .m... /T A -v I YoTT MILrE(s. ,Tv i TEc1S e,:,4- I/\-,I#-/\i f'?'114 rL✓ FLAJ sco- �1 P.wI-5P-.-t-A to-i. Pu�i.�•,wn a18c_�* /el ,, II_oil -.aif se,,- ell- Io. — r - 441 p�_.. - .— /,. F50e, Q 41-0 P., , .\tr.. )- /1(• • Lall: oz 0 90. 12,114,P-1 f{4W . o OP IGS L-' MEeTi�kj/WJGFI Bus naz• L'-oV I 1"" 2o'-LI - - .44I-OI - r- PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON ED ,ZJ'- '), f 1-.41-I rf kY 8 1989 li 14 . nt F P i.- ii u g I soul.lp olds I FroIJTIac I G11'I sk01J(1,Oor1 .u,,.:Qs.b1,404¢1 ....ov.°.v. awe.a m DATE: 211 101 ..vs.0 VLIT MIL..BIW' AIs,CNITYL'1'S 1.3a0JE 1oN,N•1e Al,i .sawe.,M., (-IA 95.34- -o..v.wo.u..n:— SGh1-811 3M MEW OEM MOM(3..13.•• •1••Y8 10 . . 41-Wos as • 1 . i w9S 1 '9 )� J� iMrl4y4d•rss - _ Sn W�O q �ai��, (.au)a -,rr 'r1 /rl ur+wnIr, ,p 31.1...f'D.4 Wm., osr#17"19d (i11.19 jlrin 40.44.7 4411774IaS .. . ...,..... --% --------7.• . 3; 4: tY:. I III 11 I I 1 1 u .LIIZC I. —' - uJ" -F Qdx7 LiIet o r ,+lrnara i .. —'� ) P d +1;..4d .aelvs f amrr•I,y ./— �1 J :n / lly I 1 I l/` 7'^D� A J. {.17 1 1 v r r:eaa '-- i-- , ,La1r+3 nIIW . -IV 1 • \ems _ �.. � �'--- - -;-'- -- ' 17 :1-j]-11]- --ill ij ,J . ' e ,w•-' _E { • . . • •..•• TTTT-rT I I r r I r rl I I 1 I J ,- ti ,_..� • "T ..ni.T-r'Tttr1 ...,, 1 1 r J-i- .-.-c-- r � i �- -..c J i -r--1-1 . I t AO SNOISIA31 r Fr . MEMO �'f ,_ _ .•Sl.` ,. 1 .^j• -�/ \C I\/ EVIDW 91DI RM1116 DUAL TRIM MARTIN 0[TAR . e. , V • ar 41\;?� �� �� .t`tr kI ar.eI i: 4P ® \1_\{ U.31uLWl Nu WIw "1.4..Tu.... ai're) ls ; Y �� 1 CO _ �:_ , , — ( (,....[ 1 • e 7 .�� el \i \ - 1 lira-,. <I 04 S,. � y, I 4 'Tee aKfoR A k91FUfE VIZ. [y.s.u[J �;f. _ e‘ \r D.�a...waFF.la qq�pW w� //..(1 I...Y Iu•W ik lauDY uPE=y1uoS 1 ^ �+ W.+I Lua E N n� r.0 ram...._:Scat., •• ynY• 1pA` JINN 4 La a..1 I.T. p.v.LAw'Wu kM,41 .161 1ti __. • _`rya• -- ".._—'- •S7 -•-1 I ugVLY 5@ciJG. f1dJIDL F`.....0J.L.EM at �1-y! ;`�+-' CAD LVYtN'I'JCLL.1,,ntenrlD Poi Nu....40C. �{ rsr.u�.r.rrr �'... �/.R '�jy IL1 70o UIJ\ ill JET tui4/tL l.c[.it//F.rows r. ' u.0..._u r..�r. • •mminlnrnnnul nn.w._ww.unlnnmmmr 11.=`. wrww�..I.� p9 f'.911�Pill (,..„• ,,, II..k �+ �r. rtY !I.RIIIIYn us _.. _ I - m -Illwl IIIAII/ �.._..........1 II � ` • I 2 �.a \. I / ) lam! � I ;% / ,• _ __ =— `tt,VI/MA. =rrm7,.r...�. .• . n011T111 71.14 R...T • 411) a111D01... -'.44T 4F*L 54z.P a#`^ATK "•..••,•• y1`,I1 , -�J y xktk I:Ioti •G'•r� T I D n.. LI�.DS -o a•o 17T IV 1 9vJoc SC ca�I,kiF F•^o11oeLVAI Iva,- .0 .T,e,. :OT U1.1DY.f'E LFLLJ.cad 1A`I ' •�"�- }.M4�OG «n E,.aw¢FUIG crFFIY GD,oco 34.R. .•��, •", L• E A.T P�•+e1G AREA IIEIF.R/VAN DE VANTFR .f- C F •lfr 9EDoTSJCF MCNiIl111 6'-1'11(,wu. RE.2= L IlbyAF.C: GROUP PS t�� ,, A, ?oUtlLPf� t.0 55 5.0 xi W. 4 b7.. C,0. iFT. so.D.ign Sa.irn t ^ yll J'-'at •' Jerre LJYFE4' 2e-,,-SEl.I.r.*1 Suile 2fU I�til� � � rIl tr; V• 'FuvYFOE A![P i.' '�. '..---q D.erk[i TIYD- Z'ro C.�(+t•1 LAU L 11,NIDpD • tKo O.K. 6126elkve NST NE fY.NIE o ka Lin-.rJ L::ar. Belk••ue.NA 8004 _--..R'� .[u 'I�lu cN LAWI.I 8.�' .•t5,5 ni Tbr-2r.ta, el 420e 451.8001 •"�1' m UaJ(5ev1\ inn•a:kl1 Mf S+rnu9[.wA [ 9V W.rinn *.f.T.J 1:'"!Na D ALr1Z.I I,T.. „�Tnhol I�ln!mINIIII () rt '` )I. SIFCeYAI roger-5 —eteu6MOvT.'�9.LI� .-...y.a. • a :�• illI .i.woo- ( eeltTlu o aT••1.1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN , / SOUND OLDS, C� PONTIAC yf "I tthti9Ni�V!i D1� (Iv.�ON- - - -- .— ® BERM SECTION Re�itollr.�HA R� 1':•;7fl' Wit 111"-I=•• - I I I .1._h•'7 1_, . I _ I • D MAY 1 8 1989 �I S II1aVV1111 ...n:.mae a¢o.cv.asps.n Wvw¢ : ZE•9Ll - , '.L,"Irlr� - - ' ` [ LYLo'S.J. '" ;'.P:� ' Ga1, •..m• TT qLs-•o¢raT¢L.a�am...S.Gw,- •••Atnaq AwTaTTN.WT.Padn pa spay,..TV 'ox 17lMxd rci_.rJ -I`IO i 3t;`/7'`�-'-,1 (� 'r j w-.+r.o++ __ _ I QI as vnw,a..,,•.a.W n.Tatwm Roo J•...•aw.n i,mt•.o.w T¢ta:LtaT•¢m.•,W.mn•STTaa. 'T a i ;-.QQ rtcn-03s I ' •w•C TLw.,.,...yaps-pow T.•ama•w Spirt)•u!•aw{{ •a Td T�•.mia•w¢.tuam. 1-i>�wLi?. .•a ":a/\C:d1�N71'310p Y. l C�. �s":Yl l �rt-.i{.Nntyf-i '1 t.n n•ld•? - mrnLT•n•Ldm¢ .m w�nrvb...a T.."Parlor/t.aom¢.nniT•n .a.vry•:olaTWsa T T II...•...,ynaW.Vo.•. , el .sa,¢n.¢m. oP T.6.,..to v.T.f.a..wa... >Q 177(i •4•� .�_ . siYaT•�i i.�'J� yi..G+1O 6T•a....p•toi{poplars spas.:...TIPP mna.i[d o.p•aurTp..4.,u.ma.Tn.T..W P.P pa.si •• F I --..._. 1 -- - ' _' OZ -- ••c ,v m ..n ¢d PPP T\':\f 11-I n 1.. _ •mUTywa Wm,6 L.¢r6ra. •S•n PaTaniT•¢ .0 i u.l.w Paso. T•- ,.i tRa¢nm•w W pva•tdam • ' '�1 f i i \ ! I - • •T 6cT�.vmt P...¢tia.n.u¢a•w STaw a•.T•a¢T..[i1znan•Ta..P...••n TIS..T•.wi E. j 1',.,I t.I i�.':J(i.1;.:��'\;�a • - - T •�otmn.,6 t¢T'.•a¢..t .�;aaa.¢caen.e..a v.wm..w PT. .•v,ma.�¢�e¢T,..ta v�:,e�nn i •L ' ¢ I .1'3: .o , m w rap.SaTiTa•I conma¢¢rnu /msw•• nodYai I IP '- •Tmama arts sop Pp....papaw Yr.a¢T..••T¢Y•Pd uwe •L q Ps. enwo.A91i¢la/Ydia°.i Almond. • �. : d-� nn�-1-7�s - • .Ana¢ GG-GL•..L.•-aG,.a/tOP.a Y ( -T=+, _ _ l•.•rY s•T¢T•a....AIL,..'GL¢'SMG mTan••li^[uPio Pit Y puma Fa Ti •V••¢a••vraq •G ? ,':; �• %� ,y •.Pawn•tp, •a..w PP...n Popov.,a •w ptar n _ dP R -'.\,_ ._"'�' _ .. :.��_ f.Z, ri3"...'a GI .w J¢Jantw•P.d.r pap Ytw•ay v.•JL¢.P.p....u•..ranrP m.wT'.,w¢¢aw. w¢p•>°T -• • _ . -a— il _''`S--' _ _ "�L. -• a .wTar•t.buTW,6 0l•ropy w aa•tP.r .mn•••ca •L >.�• _ _ +._•.G _t .u'sY•..i 's.�..i,P.r.,gi •.%+.w¢TSTd i¢^ad.d • 9 - 29••i13aa. W •w So papules uTa••wo•. •i.Or....PP•A,a Prom.o•Sol..Pop•d UT.6.79.•• i - :. •,I L _ `�• - _—t i.r..a..wt.••T.P.na6•A.,.c,e a •¢6.w W to v•.J'JP,.4 ar•w ITN..u.Tao..•uoa•TV Sp •• • .. ��• •1 r.•— ��! r''teni` - { ai .. •vtw.v ems...•PJ w voa.d.w w LTP•PP.....Lima•.ue..,i •v • .11 _ • r . __ .., •..-wane sou••rao.-.w•PPP., •• T ._ ___ _ _ _ - ••aTi n.Taa¢[rw ups Y PIP.m E - .. • - .I I.-a1 �T•�. �• I_ ' T--.— •wa4•6wtua•Qa'o.,np,o n••w aa•asysw.••Ta TTTa.a Swops,•6u11,•d Po.nrodu..d ' t i I~J- .A. �n +- . 4: amps Jo tl •w Ja pp..•rtwa•wo••Yw 6.Yrd So•oa 2 ./N=; ' 3''''' '� .•i S_ — ____.. _-- .r sot.wpm.n'awtcn•••a.waxw rrantop uopu•a•v/wtaunu,n.. u•P.P.6u TL• ' • 3 "-_: '•• r..._wa..'�; r..:. - I .PPI UPS w.T+...Ill.J¢O wY ouw,m,v w w moo pnnw a• v.paM.PP U• •L Fp1 — __ -- - =CP Yd112t1211.2,mYr` fix.-- ._ " - - - - __ . .:.__._ _� 1::- -;-•-__Sin of isna.e: c .. nR c�.{.i.n. .. _-- ^!L zs> 9 ..:.mac- .. _. -.- aar.--c::-e- ••1. a ,:?,fs w. \ .. f - son.' jf .. Itr \ '� ~- r�iG.('i p�!u-•w' ,'S',l'/' ', .; ,r1r � �� 'tea * 6 • '_. i4e iz��F' ..�,. -� .-5w_.-�. .s a..G ac I` �iiaog"-"'.,)'- / 'f A '� •• _ _ ;.. rl• + L y a .s n . I. ® •®_ 11 x�vt I�o r� %✓r ft_ / T ,' ; i ' i - r I i _,• _ jl a' ii ° i rj j :' II • a 1 a .IS .. J� d .. •P .4".......:A • - ,+I ,.,; ; I ` `_9.__ V �G-a12a a]S.4..J I I _� -�` T ••..• .: 3`.X 2\ wa"1iv.otro- o. • Cro+ yrl f •® .r __ 4. ..tea-•aI. t ao..,., , y= ^�'� T"..f"4:/i• tt •,.,�. 21GL^1�1�3�//d' 97IL3dJ,LmBb . ' l t ••a' w,•vmv I= ° %j5 I -- -.'�zjt•i d • ►: i i I .2 %f•'� rCl�!�T3 I �. • ,r ,t• 3 _ .--... I I - - �aT .. ('i'T'q ' T :,. •-y n.,. _ / •( i. III I IL' �-a12 � _.▪ • �� ._� 1 -J1LJ , • c c. _,,,_ .,oc."rrJ 1' 1 / F. L r;..; a • Na•L 5'19 I / a,µ ;-vy+_. • r \• `� ', ..ca i u-aYvorvna.° 7;I I ..-•. TA 1 e¢L .:J ■ c ° • .ice I 1 r7V 1r� r'i 'A1.7a1 •G,•iwo ._ ! • 1 i• L LYt•pan 'S.V ]..:. •. .i J•.aa;D 9L .t'.t 1 �l (�. / C�•+y+IP{laPP.Y..LJ•L.owooS fplir wawa L -PIPj /' ;' - • Y ;'O'G•Ol .•'Y TITIMnm•'a 34 L•{w+Vms Al.Allflid-MST, <a.IP.'Ol 3. PPP COPS •Y. a .-.., V•.;.... ., ,-kra{nV. 7.�fL�.: .�- // SGII 1 _ s]� j : I O . • .."'N.:" 1-+`rn-1S\� a_'•i�Y ;Ce / j / .. .. �•�'/ L-a.a•.Y .•: m 1 .. ..- _ 1•} - / • .viL:e\7 �. .r+,• (lj.�,.i .• at•- '�•• •'r•�•1 , .. ..i.$ Zt F. y ' .Sx3XL{ISL.: '�dS•1:....- �G r •�'�'^ 1 a.w p�lllZ{•Ir __.. __._-_ ._. _ - _. aar ... . .._....-�..........w...r..'.�!�a':.:._..... . _ .. ._-..• ....__.r-..... • • ` �. a�s `•Pi-la e�T_^`_-__.__'. .- .n - �� - - _ �r _. w...y.� w _ I .• ` y ar - .-- .•. _i- J �� .. _ • - . _ . • . ,. - .. `-a'-- ..: __ _-....�.. %• s C Zc 1141 5d- j c✓/`L S d 1`LN,.\aw-1 CERTIFICATION OF NOTIFICATION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS/SITE PLAN * * *FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY* * * PROJECT TITLE: Sct- o APPLICANT:APPLICATION NUMBER: S As - 057_6 Io The following is a list of adjacent property owners and their addresses. A notification of the pending site plan application shall be sent to these individuals as prescribed by Renton City Code, Chapter 7 Section 38 of Title IV (Building Regulations) of Ordinance No. 1628 relating to site plan approval. ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER {ti// ,/ l s )lac-sf wr'i-.°"out- �' cll (�-v,P 1,/Ji, _ tr s�v' 5 C�L6 LL) vL 6O W e-1-41 1`) , , 's°\A`"r I S Cs q -GI I z3-0 y� R.That-(` LA cd 1,,.,(t) c1.1,41)-C cuity - ]- s .-.1 ,\ c j i viz. -0 ® 9031 ®0 ).„e; -h ilite -11 Sl4-) i LIA-) . c a,i7t., ',.-it-/-vv,r4r1 12,.LI <.. COI': .S f 'vl:talci:, — 18 Z -o 't 1 ` EP 10-L:Llt Clliz-PCZ wtharl 141-t1144) — 61 et 1 Eti-filit/C4, ----- I 8 1 `2,47S- I-)1 -C) • CITY OF REN ON 9 - IA AY 1 8 1.989 I � I � ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • ASSESSOR'S NAME ADDRESS PARCEL NUMBER • • 119t CERTIFICATION G, �Ihereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property owners and their addresses were taken from the records of the King County Assessor as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me. a Notary Public, in and for the tate of Washington residing at G —J , on the /q-r-A, day of /L -O (q 2? 447 _,e SIGNED: aft CERTIFICATION OF MAILING hereby certify that notices of the public meeting on the subject site plan approval were on c u.r- I 19b' , to each listed adjacent property owner as prescribed by law. ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington residing at &-r N , on the 15T day of 5 (J4\..Q)__ 9 SIGNED: .k.., FORM 208