HomeMy WebLinkAboutContractAGREEMENT FOR A POPULATION AND COMMUNITY
DEMOGRAPHY REPORT WITH KAYA STRATEGIK LLC
THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only as August 14, 2023, is by and between the
City of Renton (the “City”), a Washington municipal corporation, and KAYA Strategik LLC
(“Consultant”), a Washington Limited Liability Company. The City and the Consultant are referred
to collectively in this Agreement as the “Parties.” Once fully executed by the Parties, this
Agreement is effective as of the last date signed by both parties.
1. Scope of Work: Consultant agrees to provide data comparison between current and 2014
demographic information resulting in an updateable presentation format deliverable as
specified in Exhibit A, and its attachments,which is attached and incorporatedhereinand
may hereinafter be referred to as the “Work.”
2. Changes in Scope of Work: The City, without invalidating this Agreement, may order
changes to the Work consisting of additions, deletions or modifications. Any such changes
to the Work shall be ordered by the City in writing and the Compensation shall be
equitably adjusted consistent with the rates set forth inExhibit A or as otherwise mutually
agreed by the Parties.
3. Time of Performance: Consultant shall commence performance of the Agreement
pursuant to the schedule(s) set forth in Exhibit A. All Work shall be performed by no later
than December 22, 2023.
4. Compensation:
A. Amount. Total compensation to Consultant for Work provided pursuant to this
Agreement shall not exceed $99,500, plus any applicable state and local sales taxes.
Compensation shall be paid based upon Work actually performed according to the
rate(s) or amounts specified in Exhibit A. The Consultant agrees that any hourly or flat
rate charged by it for its Work shall remain locked at the negotiated rate(s) unless
otherwise agreed to in writing or provided in Exhibit A. Except as specifically provided
herein, the Consultant shall be solely responsible for payment of any taxes imposed
as a result of the performance and payment of this Agreement.
B. Method of Payment. On a monthly or no less than quarterly basis during any quarter
in which Work isperformed, the Consultant shall submit a voucher or invoice in a form
specified by the City, including a description of what Work has been performed, the
CAG-23-300
PAGE 2 OF 10
name of the personnel performing such Work, and any hourly labor charge rate for
such personnel. The Consultant shall also submit a final bill upon completion of all
Work. Payment shall be made by the City for Work performed within thirty (30)
calendar days after receipt and approval by the appropriate City representative of the
voucher or invoice. If the Consultant’s performance does not meet the requirements
of this Agreement, the Consultant will correct or modify its performance to comply
with the Agreement. The City may withhold payment for work that does not meet the
requirements of this Agreement.
C. Effect of Payment. Payment for any part of the Work shall not constitute a waiver by
the City of any remedies it may have against the Consultant for failure of the
Consultant to perform the Work or for any breach of this Agreement by the
Consultant.
D. Non-Appropriation of Funds. If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for
payment under this Agreement for any future fiscal period, the City shall not be
obligated to make payments for Work or amounts incurred after the end of the
current fiscal period, and this Agreement will terminate upon the completion of all
remaining Work for which funds are allocated. No penalty or expense shall accrue to
the City in the event this provision applies.
5. Termination:
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without
cause by giving ten(10) calendar days’ notice to the Consultant in writing. In the event
of such termination or suspension, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies,
worksheets, models and reports, or other material prepared by the Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted to the City, if any are required as part
of the Work.
B. In the event this Agreement is terminated by the City, the Consultant shall be entitled
to payment for all hours worked to the effective date of termination, less all payments
previously made. If the Agreement is terminated by the Cityafter partial performance
of Work for which the agreed compensation is a fixed fee, the City shall pay the
Consultant an equitable share of the fixed fee. This provision shall not prevent the
City from seeking any legal remedies it may have for the violation or nonperformance
of any of the provisions of this Agreement and such charges due to the City shall be
deducted from the final payment due the Consultant. No payment shall be made by
the City for any expenses incurred or work done following the effective date of
termination unless authorized in advance in writing by the City.
6. Warranties And Right To Use Work Product: Consultant represents and warrants that
Consultant will perform all Work identified in this Agreement in a professional and
PAGE 3 OF 10
workmanlike manner and in accordance with all reasonable and professional standards
and laws. Compliance with professional standards includes, as applicable, performing the
Work in compliance with applicable City standards or guidelines (e.g. design criteria and
Standard Plans for Road, Bridgeand Municipal Construction). Professional engineers shall
certify engineering plans, specifications, plats, and reports, as applicable, pursuant to
RCW 18.43.070. Consultant further represents and warrants that all final work product
created for and delivered to the City pursuant to this Agreement shall be the original work
of the Consultant and free from any intellectual property encumbrance which would
restrict the City from using the work product. Consultant grants to the City a non-
exclusive, perpetual right and license to use, reproduce, distribute, adapt, modify, and
display all final work product produced pursuant to this Agreement. The City’s or other’s
adaptation, modification or use of the final work products other than for the purposes of
this Agreement shall be without liability to the Consultant. The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
7. Record Maintenance: The Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, which
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs expended and Work provided in the
performance of this Agreement and retain such records for as long as may be required by
applicable Washington State records retention laws, but in any event no less than six
years after the termination of this Agreement. The Consultant agrees to provide access
to and copies of any records related to this Agreement as required by the City to audit
expenditures and charges and/or to comply with the Washington State Public Records Act
(Chapter 42.56 RCW). The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or
termination of this Agreement.
8. Public Records Compliance: To the full extent the City determines necessary to comply
with the Washington State Public Records Act, Consultant shall make a due diligent search
of all records in its possession or control relating to this Agreement and the Work,
including, but not limited to, e-mail, correspondence, notes, saved telephone messages,
recordings, photos, or drawings and provide them to the City for production. In the event
Consultant believes said records need to be protected from disclosure, it may, at
Consultant’s own expense, seek judicial protection. Consultant shall indemnify, defend,
and hold harmless the City for all costs, including attorneys’ fees, attendant to any claim
or litigation related to a Public Records Act request for which Consultant has responsive
records and for which Consultant has withheld records or information contained therein,
or not provided them to the City in a timely manner. Consultant shall produce for
distribution any and all records responsive to the Public Records Act request in a timely
manner, unless those records are protected by court order. The provisions of this section
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
PAGE 4 OF 10
9. Independent Contractor Relationship:
A. The Consultant is retained by the City only for the purposes and to the extent set forth
in this Agreement. The nature of the relationship between the Consultant and the City
during the period of the Work shall be that of an independent contractor, not
employee. The Consultant, not the City, shall have the power to control and direct the
details, manner or means of Work. Specifically, but not by means of limitation, the
Consultant shall have no obligation to work any particular hours or particular
schedule, unless otherwise indicated in the Scope of Work or where scheduling of
attendance or performance is mutually arranged due to the nature of the Work.
Consultant shall retain the right to designate the means of performing the Work
covered by this agreement, and the Consultant shall be entitled to employ other
workers at such compensation and such other conditions as it may deem proper,
provided, however, that any contract so made by the Consultant is to be paid by it
alone, and that employing such workers, it is acting individually and not as an agent
for the City.
B. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal
income tax or Social Security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance
Program, orotherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to Consultant
or any employee of the Consultant.
C. If the Consultant is a sole proprietorship or if this Agreement is with an individual, the
Consultant agrees to notify the City and complete any required form if the Consultant
retired under a State of Washington retirement system and agrees to indemnify any
losses the City may sustain through the Consultant’s failure to do so.
10. Hold Harmless: The Consultant agrees to release, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless
the City, elected officials, employees, officers, representatives, and volunteers from any
and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, arbitrations, mediations,
proceedings, judgments, awards, injuries, damages, liabilities, taxes, losses, fines, fees,
penalties, expenses, attorney’s or attorneys’ fees, costs, and/or litigation expenses to or
by any and all persons or entities, arising from, resulting from, or related to the negligent
acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in its performance of this Agreement or a
breach of this Agreement by Consultant, except for that portion of the claims caused by
the City’s sole negligence.
Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this agreement is subject to RCW
4.24.115, (Validity of agreement to indemnify against liability for negligence relative to
construction, alteration, improvement, etc., of structure or improvement attached to real
estate…) then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons
or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the
PAGE 5 OF 10
Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers, Consultant’s
liability shall be only to the extent of Consultant’s negligence.
It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided in
this Agreement constitute Consultant’s waiver of immunity under the Industrial
Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. The Parties
have mutually negotiated and agreed to this waiver. The provisions of this section shall
survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
11. Gifts and Conflicts: The City’s Code of Ethics and Washington State law prohibit City
employees from soliciting, accepting, or receiving any gift, gratuity or favor from any
person, firm or corporation involved in a contract or transaction. To ensure compliance
with the City’s Code of Ethics and state law, the Consultant shall not give a gift of any kind
to City employees or officials. Consultant also confirms that Consultant does not have a
business interest or a close family relationship with any City officer or employee who was,
is, or will be involved in selecting the Consultant, negotiating or administering this
Agreement, or evaluating the Consultant’s performance of the Work.
12. City of Renton Business License: Unless exempted by the Renton Municipal Code,
Consultant shall obtain a City of Renton Business License prior to performing any Work
and maintain the business license in good standing throughout the term of this
agreement with the City.
Information regarding acquiring a city business license can be found at:
https://www.rentonwa.gov/Tax
Information regarding State business licensing requirements can be found at:
https://dor.wa.gov/doing-business/register-my-business
13. Insurance: Consultant shall secure and maintain:
A. Commercial general liability insurance in the minimum amounts of $1,000,000 for
each occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate for the Term of this Agreement.
B. In the event that Work delivered pursuant to this Agreement either directly or
indirectly involve or require Professional Services, Professional Liability, Errors and
Omissions coverage shall be provided with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per
occurrence. "Professional Services", for the purpose of this section, shall mean any
Work provided by a licensed professional or Work that requires a professional
standard of care.
C. Workers’ compensation coverage, as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the
State of Washington, shall also be secured.
PAGE 6 OF 10
D. Commercial Automobile Liability for owned, leased, hired or non-owned, leased, hired
or non-owned, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single
limit, if there will be any use of Consultant’s vehicles on the City’s Premises by or on
behalf of the City, beyond normal commutes.
E. Consultant shall name the City as an Additional Insured on its commercial general
liability policy on a non-contributory primary basis. The City’s insurance policies shall
not be a source for payment of any Consultant liability, nor shall the maintenance of
any insurance required by this Agreement be construed to limit the liability of
Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance or otherwise limit the City’s
recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
F. Subject to the City’s review and acceptance, a certificate of insurance showing the
proper endorsements, shall be delivered to the City before performing the Work.
G. Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within
two (2) business days of their receipt of such notice.
14. Delays: Consultant is not responsible for delays caused by factors beyond the
Consultant’s reasonable control. When such delays beyond the Consultant’s reasonable
controloccur, the City agrees the Consultant is not responsible for damages, nor shall the
Consultant be deemed to be in default of the Agreement.
15. Successors and Assigns: Neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, transfer or
encumber any rights, duties or interests accruing from this Agreement without the
written consent of the other.
16. Notices: Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the
appropriate party at the address which appears below (as modified in writing from time
to time by such party), and given personally, by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested, by facsimile or by nationally recognized overnight courier service. Time period
for notices shall be deemed to have commenced upon the date of receipt, EXCEPT
facsimile delivery will be deemed to have commenced on the first business day following
transmission. Email and telephone may be used for purposes of administering the
Agreement, but should not be used to give any formal notice required by the Agreement.
CITY OF RENTON
Maryjane Van Cleave
1055 South Grady Way
Renton, WA 98057
Phone: (425) 430-6713
mvancleave@rentonwa.gov
CONSULTANT
Cherry Cayabyab
10430 61st Ave. S.
Seattle, WA 98178
Phone: (206) 227-1948
cherry@kayastrategik.com
PAGE 7 OF 10
17. Discrimination Prohibited: Except to the extent permitted by a bona fide occupational
qualification, the Consultant agrees as follows:
A. Consultant, and Consultant’s agents, employees, representatives, and volunteers
with regard to the Work performed or to be performed under this Agreement, shall
not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, nationality, creed, marital
status, sexual orientation or preference, age (except minimum age and retirement
provisions), honorably discharged veteran or military status, or the presence of any
sensory, mental or physical handicap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational
qualification in relationship to hiring and employment, in employment or application
for employment, the administration of the delivery of Work or any other benefits
under this Agreement, or procurement of materials or supplies.
B. The Consultant will take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and
that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, creed,
color, national origin, sex, age, sexual orientation, physical, sensory or mental
handicaps, or marital status. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the
following employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment
advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and
selection for training.
C. If the Consultant fails to comply with any of this Agreement’s non-discrimination
provisions, the City shall have the right, at its option, to cancel the Agreement in
whole or in part.
D. The Consultant is responsible to be aware of and in compliance with all federal, state
and local laws and regulations that may affect the satisfactory completion of the
project, which includes but is not limited to fair labor laws, worker's compensation,
and Title VI of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will comply with City of Renton
Council Resolution Number 4085.
18. Miscellaneous:The parties hereby acknowledge:
A. The City is not responsible to train or provide training for Consultant.
B. Consultant will not be reimbursed for job related expenses except to the extent
specifically agreed within the attached exhibits.
C. Consultant shall furnish all tools and/or materials necessary to perform the Work
except to the extent specifically agreed within the attached exhibits.
PAGE 8 OF 10
D. In the event special training, licensing, or certification is required for Consultant to
provide Work he/she will acquire or maintain such at his/her own expense and, if
Consultant employs, sub-contracts, or otherwise assigns the responsibility to perform
the Work, said employee/sub-contractor/assignee will acquire and or maintain such
training, licensing, or certification.
E. This is a non-exclusive agreement and Consultant is free to provide his/her Work to
other entities, so long as there is no interruption or interference with the provision of
Work called for in this Agreement.
F. Consultant is responsible for his/her own insurance, including, but not limited to
health insurance.
G. Consultant is responsible for his/her own Worker’s Compensation coverage as well as
that for any persons employed by the Consultant.
19. Other Provisions:
A. Approval Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of the City
and Consultant represents and warrants that such individuals are duly authorized to
execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the City or Consultant.
B. General Administration and Management. The City’s project manager is Maryjane
Van Cleave. In providing Work, Consultant shall coordinate with the City’s contract
manager or his/her designee.
C. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement may be amended only by an
instrument in writing, duly executed by both Parties.
D. Conflicts. In the event of any inconsistencies between Consultant proposals and this
Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. Any exhibits/attachments to
this Agreement are incorporated by reference only to the extent of the purpose for
which they are referenced within this Agreement. To the extent a Consultant
prepared exhibit conflicts with the terms in the body of this Agreement or contains
terms that are extraneous to the purpose for which it is referenced, the terms in the
body of this Agreement shall prevail and the extraneous terms shall not be
incorporated herein.
E. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be made in and shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and the City of
Renton. Consultant and all of the Consultant’s employees shall perform the Work in
accordance with all applicable federal, state, county and city laws, codes and
ordinances.
PAGE 9 OF 10
F. Joint Drafting Effort. This Agreement shall be considered for all purposes as prepared
by the joint efforts of the Parties and shall not be construed against one party or the
other as a result of the preparation, substitution, submission or other event of
negotiation, drafting or execution.
G. Jurisdiction and Venue. Any lawsuit or legal action brought by any party to enforce or
interpret this Agreement or any of its terms or covenants shall be brought in the King
County Superior Court for the State of Washington at the Maleng Regional Justice
Center in Kent, King County, Washington, or its replacement or successor. Consultant
hereby expressly consents to the personal and exclusive jurisdiction and venue of
such court even if Consultant is a foreign corporation not registered with the State of
Washington.
H. Severability. A court of competent jurisdiction’s determination that any provision or
part of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable shall not cancel or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.
I. Sole and Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the
Parties and any representations or understandings, whether oral or written, not
incorporated are excluded.
J. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and each and all of
its provisions in which performance is a factor. Adherence to completion dates set
forth in the description of the Work is essential to the Consultant’s performance of
this Agreement.
K. Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to, nor shall be
construed to give any rights or benefits in the Agreement to anyone other than the
Parties, and all duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will
be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties and no one else.
L. Binding Effect. The Parties each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns,
and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement, and to the partners,
successors, assigns, and legal representatives of such other party with respect to all
covenants of the Agreement.
M. Waivers. All waivers shall be in writing and signed by the waiving party. Either party’s
failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be a waiver and shall not
prevent either the City or Consultant from enforcing that provision or any other
provision of this Agreement in the future. Waiver of breach of any provision of this
Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any prior or subsequent breach
unless it is expressly waived in writing.
PAGE 10 OF 10
N. Counterparts. The Parties may execute this Agreement in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, and all of which will together
constitute this one Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have voluntarily entered into this Agreement as of the date
last signed by the Parties below.
CITY OF RENTON
By:_____________________________
CONSULTANT
By:__ __________________________
Armondo Pavone
Mayor
Cherry Cayabyab
Owner and Principal
_____________________________
Date
_____________________________
Date
Attest
_____________________________
Jason A. Seth
City Clerk
Approved as to Legal Form
By: __________________________
M. Patrice Kent
Senior Assistant City Attorney
Contract Template Updated 5/21/2021 (file: contract/2023/2674)
8/21/2023
Approved by Patrice Kent via 8/14/2023 email
EXHIBIT A
KAYA STRATEGIK – Scope of Work
Project: City of Renton Population and Community Demography Report
x Kaya Strategik will provide a side-by-side data comparison with the most current demographic
information and match those analytics with the same data sets collected and presented in the
City of Renton Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing document
completed in June 2014 shown in Attachment 1.
x This will be in a presentation format to show how the data sets referenced in the 2014 have
changed with time in a side-by-side comparison per slide. This will not be a static document
with long narratives providing context to the data, but rather a document focused exclusively
on the data sets with title heading or brief explanation per slide. The same narratives provided
to the data provided in 2014 will be used for reference as further explanation when needed.
Examples of this type of demography work are in Attachment 2.
o The purpose for this format change is at the request of City staff so that they can
continue to update the data sets provided, versus a static document that reflects a
moment in time. This will assist in the analysis of trends and projections.
x Each data set will reference where content was retrieved and to provide transparency and
credibility to the data provided.
Deliverables: City of Renton Population and Community Demography Report
x Kaya will work with EHHS staff and others identified by EHHS staff to review data sets needed
to provide proper comparison of data that was referenced in 2014
x Kaya will collect existing data staff have readily available and collect data not readily available
from the appropriate data sources then synthesize it for comparison capabilities.
x Kaya will work with EHHS staff to provide explanations for data that can not be obtained or
updated for data referenced in 2014.
x Kaya will provide a draft and the opportunity for revisions in formatting and display of data
prior to completion of presentation document.
x Kaya will assist in presenting the final document/update at the request of EHHS staff,
contingent on Kaya availability for that date and time.
References Include:
x WA State CAPAA Community Demography (2020)
x City of Renton Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing June 2014
x COW Equity Data and Community Engagement December 12 V4
Timeline:
x Project will begin on execution of full Agreement, with completion December 22, 2023.
Budget:
x $99,500.00
x Allocated as $19,900 each for five (5) deliverables
City of Renton
Community Needs Assessment for
Human Services and Housing
June 2014
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 1 of 85
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 2 of 85
City of Renton
Community Needs Assessment for
Human Services and Housing
June 2014
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Renton, along with its partners, conducted
ƚŚĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJEĞĞĚƐƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚƚŽŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJ
human service and housing needs in the City of Renton.
The assessment provides an overall picture of community
need for housing and human services within the City and
ĞdžĂŵŝŶĞƐƚŚĞŐĂƉƐŝŶĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘
Findings
dŚĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJEĞĞĚƐƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŝĚĞŶƟĮĞƐƚǁŽ
broad values to guide the delivery of housing and
human services: equity and dignity.
ƋƵŝƚLJŝƐǁŚĞŶƐŽĐŝĂů͕ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂŶĚƉŽůŝƟĐĂů
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƉƌĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚŽŶĂƉĞƌƐŽŶ͛Ɛ
ĂŐĞ͕ĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ͕ĐŝƟnjĞŶƐŚŝƉŽƌŶĂƟŽŶĂůŽƌŝŐŝŶ͕
ĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚĐůĂƐƐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶ͕ĞƚŚŶŝĐŝƚLJ͕ŐĞŶĚĞƌ͕ŐĞŶĚĞƌ
ŝĚĞŶƟƚLJŽƌŐĞŶĚĞƌĞdžƉƌĞƐƐŝŽŶƐ͕ůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ͕ŵĂƌŝƚĂů
status, race, religion, faith, or spirituality, sexual
ŽƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͕ƐŽĐŝŽĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐƐƚĂƚƵƐ͕ǀĞƚĞƌĂŶƐƚĂƚƵƐ͕
ĂŶĚǀŝƐŝďůĞŽƌŝŶǀŝƐŝďůĞĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƟĞƐ͘
Dignity refers to the experience of receiving housing
and human services. To treat someone with dignity
is to treat them as being of worth, in a way that is
ƌĞƐƉĞĐƞƵůŽĨƚŚĞŵĂƐǀĂůƵĞĚŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐ͘
/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƐĞƚǁŽďƌŽĂĚǀĂůƵĞƐ͕ƚŚĞ
ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŝĚĞŶƟĮĞƐƚŚŝƌƚĞĞŶƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ
ĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐĂĐƌŽƐƐĮǀĞŵĂũŽƌĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ͕
including Economic Opportunity; Basic Needs for
Families; Health & Wellness; Available, Quality
Housing; and Neighborhood Opportunity:
Economic Opportunity
Support for adults who face barriers to employment.
ĐĐĞƐƐƚŽůŝǀŝŶŐͲǁĂŐĞũŽďƐĂŶĚĐĂƌĞĞƌĂĚǀĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚ͘
Basic Needs for Families
Improved access to food.
Day and night shelters for homeless families that
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 3 of 85
ŽīĞƌĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘
Increased services to help prevent homelessness to
help families stay in their homes.
Health & Wellness
ĞƩĞƌĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŚĞĂůƚŚĂŶĚĚĞŶƚĂůĐĂƌĞĨŽƌůŽǁͲ
income residents.
ĂƌůLJĐŚŝůĚŚŽŽĚƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐƐĂŶĚƉĂƌĞŶƟŶŐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ͘
More mental health and substance abuse services.
Available, Quality Housing
More rental units for very low income households
DŽƌĞƐĂĨĞ͕ĞŶĞƌŐLJĞĸĐŝĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚŚĞĂůƚŚLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĨŽƌ
low and moderate income households.
Neighborhood Opportunity
/ŵƉƌŽǀĞĚŵŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐ͘
DŽƌĞŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ŽƵƚͲŽĨͲƐĐŚŽŽůƟŵĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ
for youth.
/ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ͕ƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ĞĂƌůLJ
ĐŚŝůĚŚŽŽĚĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ͘
Approach
The assessment was conducted between July and
EŽǀĞŵďĞƌŽĨϮϬϭϯ͘sĂƌŝŽƵƐŵĞƚŚŽĚƐĨŽƌĚĂƚĂĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶ
and analysis were used to create an understanding
ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ŚƵŵĂŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ĂŶĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ͘ dŚĞ
ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚĐŽǀĞƌĞĚƚŚĞĞŶƟƌĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ĂŶĚŝŶ
some cases used King County level data to provide
ƚŚĞĐŽŶƚĞdžƚĨŽƌŝŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƟŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐŝŶZĞŶƚŽŶ͘dŚĞ
ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚĚŝĚŶŽƚĞdžĂŵŝŶĞĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶZĞŶƚŽŶ
ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƌĞƉŽƌƚƐŽĨŚŽǁŶĞĞĚƐĚŝīĞƌĞĚ
across the community. The two primary methods used
ŝŶƚŚĞĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚǁĞƌĞ͗ŐĂƚŚĞƌŝŶŐĂŶĚĂŶĂůLJnjŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐůLJ
ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĚĂƚĂĨƌŽŵĂŶĂƌƌĂLJŽĨƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂŶĚĐŽŶĚƵĐƟŶŐ
stakeholder outreach and engagement.
Next Steps
ƌŽĂĚŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐǁĞƌĞŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ͕
that will require the City and its partners to address.
Throughout the assessment process, community
stakeholders spoke of the huge challenge that the City
ĂŶĚ ŝƚƐ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ ĨĂĐĞ ŝŶ ŵĞĞƟŶŐ ƚŚĞ ŐƌŽǁŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ͘
LJ ďƌŝŶŐŝŶŐ ĨŽĐƵƐ ƚŽ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŶĞĞĚƐ͕ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ŝƐ ďĞƩĞƌ
ƉŽƐŝƟŽŶĞĚƚŽĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚĞŽŶŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨůŝĨĞĂŶĚ
ůŝǀŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐĨŽƌĂůůŝƚLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘'ŝǀĞŶƚŚĞƐĐŽƉĞŽĨ
needs, addressing them will likely require:
ͻ ŽůůĂďŽƌĂƟŽŶ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ŝƚLJ ĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ
ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐǁŝƚŚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ
ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ ĂŶĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ĐŽŵŵŽŶ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ ƚŽ
improve the delivery of services, increase resources in
the community, and possibly help expand the capacity
of agencies to meet the growing needs.
ͻ Ɛ Ă ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͕ ĨŽĐƵƐŝŶŐ ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ;ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ͕
ǀŽůƵŶƚĞĞƌƐ͕ŝŶͲŬŝŶĚĚŽŶĂƟŽŶƐͿŽŶŶĞĞĚƐ͘
ͻ&ƵƌƚŚĞƌĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐĂŶĚĞdžƉůŽƌĂƟŽŶŽĨƐƉĞĐŝĮĐŶĞĞĚƐƚŽ
ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJĂŶĚĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞƉŽůŝĐLJŽƉƟŽŶƐ͘
ͻ ĚǀĂŶĐŝŶŐ Ă ĐŽŵŵŽŶ ǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ĨƵƚƵƌĞ ŚƵŵĂŶ
services system and services in Renton.
ͻĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŶĞĞĚƐŝŶĂŶĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞ
and sustainable manner in Renton and across the
region, by using current partners and developing new
partnerships.
The Community Needs Assessment will be used in several
ǁĂLJƐ͘/ƚŝƐƚŚĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƟŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞZĞŶƚŽŶ,ƵŵĂŶ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
Strategic Plan, which will be done in the fall of 2014 and
2015. That plan will develop the steps that will need to
be taken, to get from the current state of human services
to what is desired in the future. The stakeholders that
were part of the needs assessment want to be engaged
ŝŶŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐƐŽůƵƟŽŶƐ͘
It will help the City of Renton Human Services Advisory
ŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ ŝŶ ƌĞƐƉŽŶĚŝŶŐ ƚŽ ĐŚĂŶŐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ ĂŶĚ
ĂůůŽĐĂƟŽŶŽĨĨƵŶĚƐ͘
The data in the Community Needs Assessment will
be used to help create the goals and policies for the
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ,ƵŵĂŶ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ůĞŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ͛Ɛ
Comprehensive Plan, which will be completed in 2015.
Many of the needs cross over with other Elements of the
Comprehensive Plan, such as Economic Development,
>ĂŶĚ hƐĞ͕ ĂŶĚ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ͘ /ƚ ŝƐ ĐƌŝƟĐĂů ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞ
City has a clear and consistent vision for housing and
human services that is in all the relevant elements, and
ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŝƚLJĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐũŽŝŶƚůLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŽ
accomplish the goals.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 4 of 85
1Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
June 2014
INTRODUCTION
The City of Renton, along with its partners, developed
ƚŚŝƐ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ EĞĞĚƐ ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ƚŽ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ
priority human service and housing needs in the
City of Renton. The Needs Assessment represents
ĂŶŝŶŝƟĂůƐƚĞƉŝŶƵƉĚĂƟŶŐƚŚĞ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚ,ƵŵĂŶ
Services Element of the Comprehensive Plan, and
provides a basis for developing updated strategies
to address human service and housing needs for the
community of Renton.
To create a useful focus for policy making and
strategy building, the needs presented within are
ůŝŵŝƚĞĚ ƚŽ ŚƵŵĂŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŽƉƟŽŶƐ
Žƌ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘ EĞĞĚƐ ĂƌĞ ĚĞĮŶĞĚ ĂƐ ƚŚĞ ĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞ
between what currently exists in the City of Renton
;ƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶͿĂŶĚǁŚĂƚƐŚŽƵůĚ
ĞdžŝƐƚ;ƚŚĞĚĞƐŝƌĞĚĨƵƚƵƌĞͿ͘
dŚŝƐ EĞĞĚƐ ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ďĞŶĞĮƚƐ ŐƌĞĂƚůLJ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ
ƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƟǀĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶƐŝŐŚƚƐ ŽĨ ŵĂŶLJ ŽĨ ZĞŶƚŽŶ͛Ɛ
stakeholders. By bringing focus to these pressing human
service and housing needs, Renton and its partners
ĂƌĞďĞƩĞƌƉŽƐŝƟŽŶĞĚƚŽĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚĞƚŽǁĂƌĚƐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚ
outcomes for individuals and families.
APPROACH
The assessment was conducted between July and
November of 2013. The approach used mixed
ŵĞƚŚŽĚƐĨŽƌĚĂƚĂĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶĂŶĚĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂŶ
ƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ŶĞĞĚƐ͘ dŚĞ ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ ƚŚĞ ĞŶƟƌĞ ŝƚLJ ŽĨ
Renton, and in some cases examined County-level data
ƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĐŽŶƚĞdžƚĨŽƌŝŶƚĞƌƉƌĞƟŶŐƌĞůĂƟǀĞĐŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ
ŝŶZĞŶƚŽŶ͘dŚĞĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚĚŝĚŶŽƚĞdžĂŵŝŶĞĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ
within Renton outside of stakeholder reports of how
ŶĞĞĚƐĚŝīĞƌĞĚĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘dŚĞƚǁŽƉƌŝŵĂƌLJ
ƐŽƵƌĐĞƐŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶǁĞƌĞ͗
INDICATORS & MEASURES
For each of the needs presented in this document, one
ŽƌŵŽƌĞŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĂƌĞŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚĂƐƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐ
ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŶĞĞĚ͘ tŚĞƌĞ ƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ ǁĞ ŚĂǀĞ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ
ĚŝƌĞĐƚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͘/ŶĐĂƐĞƐǁŚĞƌĞĚĂƚĂĂǀĂŝůĂďŝůŝƚLJŽƌ
ŽƉĞƌĂƟŽŶĂů ĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐ ƉƌŽŚŝďŝƚ ĚŝƌĞĐƚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͕
ŝŶĚŝƌĞĐƚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐŽƌƉƌŽdžŝĞƐĂƌĞŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ͘/ĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐ
ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐ ĐůĂƌŝĮĞƐ ƚŚĞ ŶĞĞĚƐ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚ ŝŶ
ƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚĂŶĚǁŝůůƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞŝƚLJĂŶĚ
ŝƚƐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐĂƐƚŚĞLJďƵŝůĚƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĮŶĞƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ
ƚŽ ďĞƐƚ ŵĞĞƚ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͛Ɛ ŶĞĞĚƐ͘ Ɛ ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ
ĚĞǀĞůŽƉƐŶĞǁƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͕ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ
ǁŝůů ďĞ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ ƚŽ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞ ǁŚĞƚŚĞƌ ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐ ĂƌĞ
ŽƉĞƌĂƟŽŶĂůůLJĨĞĂƐŝďůĞĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚ
ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͘
City of Renton
Community Needs Assessment for
Human Services and Housing
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 5 of 85
2 City of Renton | Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
Publicly available data. To enable the needs assessment
ƚŽďĞƵƉĚĂƚĞĚŽǀĞƌƟŵĞ͕ƚŚĞĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞƐƉƵďůŝĐůLJ
available and accessible data. The assessment team
reviewed basic demographic and community data
available from the U.S. Census Bureau as well as an array
of regional data sources. The full list of data variables is
presented in Appendix A. Future strategic planning and
ƉŽůŝĐLJƐĞƫŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐƐŚŽƵůĚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌƐƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƟŶŐ
ƚŚŝƐŶĞĞĚƐĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĨƌŽŵ
human service and housing stakeholders.
Stakeholder outreach and engagement. The assessment
process included a targeted program of stakeholder
ĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƚŽ͗
Support the development of a common
understanding of community need.
WƌŽǀŝĚĞůŽĐĂůĞdžƉĞƌƟƐĞŝŶŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐƚŚĞŵŽƐƚ
pressing human service needs.
/ĚĞŶƟĨLJŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐƚŽĂĐĐĞƐƐŝŶŐƚŚĞŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
ĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐƚŚĂƚĂůƌĞĂĚLJĞdžŝƐƚŝŶ
Renton.
ƵůƟǀĂƚĞƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌďƵLJͲŝŶĂŶĚĐŽŵŵŝƚŵĞŶƚƚŽ
ĨƵƚƵƌĞĂĐƟŽŶĨŽƌĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚ
housing needs.
ŶƐƵƌĞƌĞƐƵůƟŶŐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐĂŶĚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĂƌĞ
meaningful to local stakeholders.
dŚĞƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚĞƌǀŝĞǁƐ͕
provider and resident focus groups, a visioning session
ǁŝƚŚ ZĞŶƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ,ƵŵĂŶ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĚǀŝƐŽƌLJ ŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ͕
ĂǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉǁŝƚŚĂŐƌŽƵƉŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ͛ƐŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
and housing providers, and a workshop of City
ŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƐƚĂī͘dŚĞŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚĂŶĚĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƉůĂŶ
ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞĚĐŽŶǀĞƌƐĂƟŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐǁŚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚ
direct service to the residents of Renton (such as the
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŝŶ^ĐŚŽŽůƐ&ĂŵŝůLJ>ŝĂŝƐŽŶƐͿ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĐůŝĞŶƚƐ
ŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ͛ƐƐŽĐŝĂůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐ;ƐƵĐŚĂƐZĞŶƚŽŶ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐͿ͘
LJ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjŝŶŐ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŐƌŽƵƉƐ͕ ŽƚŚĞƌ ǀŽŝĐĞƐ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ
community are likely less well represented. For example,
ƚŚŝƐĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŵĂLJŶŽƚƌĞŇĞĐƚƚŚĞƐƉĞĐŝĮĐƉĞƌƐƉĞĐƟǀĞƐ
of middle-income working adults, homeowners, and
employers.
COMMUNITY
NEEDS
This needs assessment describes community human
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĞĚďLJŵĂũŽƌĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ͘
These categories include Economic Opportunity; Basic
EĞĞĚƐĨŽƌ&ĂŵŝůŝĞƐ͖,ĞĂůƚŚΘtĞůůŶĞƐƐ͖ǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͕YƵĂůŝƚLJ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ͖ĂŶĚEĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚKƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ͘
/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚŝŶƚŚĞEĞĞĚƐ
Assessment process, community members, service
providers and other stakeholders provided a wealth
ŽĨ ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƐ ŽĨ ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ
individuals in Renton and the barriers to opportunity
ƚŚĂƚŵĂŶLJĞŶĐŽƵŶƚĞƌ͘dŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞƐĞĐŽŶǀĞƌƐĂƟŽŶƐ͕
ƚŚĞƌĞǁĞƌĞƚǁŽĐƌŽƐƐĐƵƫŶŐƚŚĞŵĞƐƚŚĂƚĞŵĞƌŐĞĚĂƐ
important values to foster as the community and its
leaders work together to meet human services and
housing needs. These two values are Equity and Dignity.
EquityŝƐǁŚĞŶƐŽĐŝĂů͕ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂŶĚƉŽůŝƟĐĂů
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƉƌĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚŽŶĂƉĞƌƐŽŶ͛Ɛ
ĂŐĞ͕ĂƉƉĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ͕ĐŝƟnjĞŶƐŚŝƉŽƌŶĂƟŽŶĂůŽƌŝŐŝŶ͕
ĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚĐůĂƐƐŝĮĐĂƟŽŶ͕ĞƚŚŶŝĐŝƚLJ͕ŐĞŶĚĞƌ͕ŐĞŶĚĞƌ
ŝĚĞŶƟƚLJŽƌŐĞŶĚĞƌĞdžƉƌĞƐƐŝŽŶ͕ůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ͕ŵĂƌŝƚĂů
status, race, religion, faith, or spirituality, sexual
ŽƌŝĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ͕ƐŽĐŝŽĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐƐƚĂƚƵƐ͕ǀĞƚĞƌĂŶƐƚĂƚƵƐ͕
ĂŶĚǀŝƐŝďůĞŽƌŝŶǀŝƐŝďůĞĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƟĞƐ͘
Dignity refers to the experience of receiving housing
and human services. To treat someone with dignity
is to treat them as being of worth, in a way that is
ƌĞƐƉĞĐƞƵůŽĨƚŚĞŵĂƐǀĂůƵĞĚŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐ͘
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
Most human services and housing programs aim to
increase the social and economic well-being of individuals
ĂŶĚ ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ͘ &ĂŵŝůŝĞƐ ǁŝƚŚ ƐƵĸĐŝĞŶƚ ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ĂƌĞ
ůĂƌŐĞůLJĂďůĞƚŽĂƩĂŝŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚŽŵĞĞƚƚŚĞŝƌ
needs. In general, improving economic opportunity in a
community for those who face barriers to employment,
career advancement, and other forms of economic
opportunity can improve, prevent, or reduce needs
for social service and housing supports. In some cases,
families with otherwise adequate purchasing power will
have extraordinary needs that outstrip their resources.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 6 of 85
3Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
June 2014
Support for adults who face barriers
to employment.
ZĞŶƚŽŶŚĂƐĂƌĞůĂƟǀĞůLJŚŝŐŚƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶŽĨ
ŝƚƐƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŶŐŝŶƚŚĞůĂďŽƌ
force and, since the peak of the recession
in 2009, has had a lower unemployment
ƌĂƚĞƚŚĂŶ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJŽǀĞƌĂůů͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕
despite the locally available employment
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ͕ŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϮ͕ϱϬϬƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ
;ďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϮϬϭϯĞƐƟŵĂƚĞͿ
are seeking employment.
Many unemployed adults need support
ƚŽ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƟŽŶ ŝŶƚŽ ĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͘ ŝƌĞĐƚ
supports to those seeking employment
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ ŝŶ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJŝŶŐ ĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ ŽƚŚĞƌ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ ƚŽ ŽǀĞƌĐŽŵĞ
ďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽĂƉƉůLJŝŶŐĨŽƌĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐ͗
&ŝůůŝŶŐŽƵƚŽŶůŝŶĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ͘
Compiling work history or references.
ŽĐƵŵĞŶƟŶŐĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ͘
ŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞũŽďƐĞĂƌĐŚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘
^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŽŽǀĞƌĐŽŵĞŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůůŝĂďŝůŝƟĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ
criminal history or credit problems.
Employment support service needs vary by class of
ǁŽƌŬĞƌ͕ǁŝƚŚĞĂĐŚŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůŶĞĞĚŝŶŐĂĚŝīĞƌĞŶƚƐƵďƐĞƚ
ŽĨƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ͘&ƵƌƚŚĞƌĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐǁŝůůďĞŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ
ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ ďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐ ĂŶĚ ĞīĞĐƟǀĞ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ ƚŽ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ
access to employment.
Potential Indicators:
Exhibit 1 shows the unemployment rate for the City
of Renton and King County over the last 10 years. In
ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ŐĞŶĞƌĂů ƵŶĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ ƌĂƚĞ ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƵƌĞĂƵŽĨ>ĂďŽƌ^ƚĂƟƐƟĐƐ͕ƚǁŽŽƚŚĞƌǀĂƌŝĂďůĞƐ
ƵƐĞĨƵůĨŽƌƚƌĂĐŬŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶƚŚĂƚ
ĨĂĐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚĂƌĞ͗
The number of persons who are persistently
ƵŶĞŵƉůŽLJĞĚ;ƵŶĞŵƉůŽLJĞĚĨŽƌŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϮϳǁĞĞŬƐͿ͘
ŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶĂůŝƚLJŝŶĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚƌĂƚĞƐĂŵŽŶŐƌĂĐĞ͕
gender, age, language ability, or neighborhood.
dŚĞƐĞǀĂƌŝĂďůĞƐĐĂŶŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚĚĞƚĂŝůƐĂďŽƵƚƚŚĞƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ
barriers to employment residents of Renton face.
These data are not published for the City of Renton,
though current service providers can provide anecdotal
ADDRESSING STRUCTURAL CAUSES
TO ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
tŚŝůĞƚŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌLJŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞŶĞĞĚŝƐĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ
ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚĂƌĞůĂƚĞĚŶĞĞĚ
ƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐĂŶĚŝŵƉůŝĐŝƚďŝĂƐĞƐƚŚĂƚ
ůŝŵŝƚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJĨŽƌĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƐŽŵĞĐůĂƐƐĞƐŽĨ
ǁŽƌŬĞƌƐ͘dŚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ
ƐƵĐŚĂƐůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ͕ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ͕ĂƉƉůŝĐĂŶƚ
ƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĐƌĞĚŝƚĐŚĞĐŬƐ͕ĂŶĚĞŵƉůŽLJĞƌ
ǁŝůůŝŶŐŶĞƐƐƚŽƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŽďƌŝĚŐĞƉĞŽƉůĞ
ďĂĐŬŝŶƚŽĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͘>ĂďŽƌŵĂƌŬĞƚŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐ
ůŽǁͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJũŽďƐŝŶƚĞƌŵƐŽĨƉĂLJĂŶĚďĞŶĞĮƚƐ͕ĐĂŶůĞĂĚ
ƚŽũŽďŝŶƐƚĂďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚďĞĂďĂƌƌŝĞƌƚŽŵĞĂŶŝŶŐĨƵů͕ƐƚĂďůĞ
ĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͘ŵŽƌĞĚŝĸĐƵůƚŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŵĂLJďĞ
ŝŵŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐƚŽũŽďƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƵŶƐƉŽŬĞŶĞdžĐůƵƐŝŽŶ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƐŝŶǁŚŝĐŚũŽďŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶŝƐ
ĞdžĐŚĂŶŐĞĚĂŶĚŝŵƉůŝĐŝƚƌĂĐŝĂů͕ŐĞŶĚĞƌ͕ŽƌĂŐĞďŝĂƐŽŶƚŚĞ
ƉĂƌƚŽĨĞŵƉůŽLJĞƌƐ͘
^ŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽŝƐƐƵĞƐŽĨĚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶĂůŝƚLJŝŶƵŶĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͕
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĂŶĚŝŵƉůŝĐŝƚďŝĂƐĐƌĞĂƚĞƐĚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶĂůŝƚLJŝŶ
ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJĨŽƌƚŚŽƐĞǁŚŽĂƌĞǁŽƌŬŝŶŐ͘tŽŵĞŶ͕
ŵĞŶŽĨŵŝŶŽƌŝƚLJƌĂĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŐƌŽƵƉƐĞĂƌŶůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶ
ƚŚĞŝƌĐŽƵŶƚĞƌƉĂƌƚƐĞĂƌŶĨŽƌƐŝŵŝůĂƌũŽďƐĂŶĚŚĂǀĞĨĞǁĞƌ
ŽƉƟŽŶƐĨŽƌĐĂƌĞĞƌĂĚǀĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚ͘
^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ ďŽƚŚ ƉĞƌƐŽŶĂů͕ ǁŽƌŬƉůĂĐĞ͕ ĂŶĚ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚǁŝůůŚĂǀĞƚŚĞŐƌĞĂƚĞƐƚ
ƐƵĐĐĞƐƐŝŶƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŝŶĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͘
ϯ͘ϲй
ϱ͘Ϯй
ϵ͘Ϯй
ϰ͘ϲй
Ϭ͘Ϭй
ϭ͘Ϭй
Ϯ͘Ϭй
ϯ͘Ϭй
ϰ͘Ϭй
ϱ͘Ϭй
ϲ͘Ϭй
ϳ͘Ϭй
ϴ͘Ϭй
ϵ͘Ϭй
ϭϬ͘Ϭй
ϮϬϬϯ ϮϬϬϰ ϮϬϬϱ ϮϬϬϲ ϮϬϬϳ ϮϬϬϴ ϮϬϬϵ ϮϬϭϬ ϮϬϭϭ ϮϬϭϮ ϮϬϭϯ
;WͿ
<ŝŶŐ
ZĞŶƚŽŶ
Exhibit 1
Unemployment Rate, 2003 - 2013
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Local Area Unemployment Statistics. 2013 is a preliminary
estimate based on data through August.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 7 of 85
4 City of Renton | Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĂďŽƵƚƚŚĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐĨĂĐĞĚďLJƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĐůĂƐƐĞƐ
of workers.
Access to living-wage jobs and career advancement.
Many households with working adults do not earn
enough income to cover living expenses. This can be due
ƚŽƚŽŽůŝƩůĞĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŽŽĨĞǁŚŽƵƌƐŽƌƉĂƌƚͲ
ƟŵĞĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĨƵůůĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚĂƚǁĂŐĞƐ
too low to support basic needs.
Many low-income working adults have extremely limited
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƚŽĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐŬŝůůƐƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ
that are available in Renton such as professional-
technical programs at Renton Technical College. These
ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĂƌĞƐŝŵƉůLJŽƵƚŽĨƌĞĂĐŚĚƵĞƚŽ
ĐŽƐƚ͕ƟŵĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐ͕ĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƟĞƐ͕ŽƌŽƚŚĞƌ
barriers.
Potential Indicators:
&ƵůůͲƟŵĞǁŽƌŬĞƌƐĞĂƌŶŝŶŐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶĂůŝǀĂďůĞǁĂŐĞ
WĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶŝŶƐŬŝůůƐƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŽĨƚĂƌŐĞƚĞĚ
ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶƐ
BASIC NEEDS FOR
FAMILIES
dŚĞƌĞ ĂƌĞ ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ ŝŶ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐŝŶŐ ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ
economic hardship who are unable to meet their most
basic needs, including adequate shelter and having
ĞŶŽƵŐŚƚŽĞĂƚ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚŝƐŝƐĂƐŵĂůůƉĞƌĐĞŶƚĂŐĞŽĨĂůů
families, the needs are very urgent.
tŚŝůĞ ŝŵŵĞĚŝĂƚĞ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĂƌĞ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ ĨŽƌ ƚŚŽƐĞ ǁŚŽ
ĂƌĞ ŝŶ ĐƌŝƐŝƐ͕ ƉƌĞǀĞŶƚĂƟǀĞ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ƐƵĐŚ ĂƐ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚ
ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ ĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ ŽŶ ŵĂŶĂŐŝŶŐ
household expenses are also needed.
Improved access to quality food.
^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĂƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚĂŶĚŐƌŽǁŝŶŐŶĞĞĚ
for improved access to quality food in Renton. Many
families do not have enough to eat and must make
ƚƌĂĚĞŽīƐ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ĨŽŽĚ ĂŶĚ ŽƚŚĞƌ ůŝǀŝŶŐ ĞdžƉĞŶƐĞƐ͘
ŚŝůĚƌĞŶĂŶĚƚŚĞĞůĚĞƌůLJĂƌĞƉĂƌƟĐƵůĂƌůLJǀƵůŶĞƌĂďůĞ͘
There are a number of programs that provide food
ŝŶ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ƚŚĂƚ ĂůƐŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ĐƌŝƟĐĂů ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ
ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘/ŶĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚĞĚŶƵƚƌŝƟŽŶĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͕
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ ĂŶĚ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ƵƐĞƌƐ ŽĨ ŶƵƚƌŝƟŽŶ
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ ĂƌĞĂƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ ƐLJƐƚĞŵ ƚŚĂƚ
can be improved to serve a wider range of individuals
and households as well as improve access to and the
ĞĸĐĂĐLJŽĨĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘ŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐĂŶĚďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐŝŶ
ƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐLJƐƚĞŵŽĨĨŽŽĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
dŚĞĨĞĚĞƌĂůŶƵƚƌŝƟŽŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ
meals to children on school days, but the children
have inadequate food on the days schools are closed.
dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶĂŶĚŵŽďŝůŝƚLJďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽ
ĂĐĐĞƐƐŝŶŐĞdžŝƐƟŶŐĨŽŽĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘
Some programs are not able to accommodate
culturally or religiously appropriate foods.
For homeless individuals and families, there are
limited day resources to store, cook, and eat healthy
foods.
Many families need support to improve household
ĨŽŽĚďƵĚŐĞƟŶŐĂŶĚŚĞĂůƚŚLJĐŽŽŬŝŶŐƐŬŝůůƐ͘
^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐĞŵƉŚĂƐŝnjĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJŽĨĨŽŽĚ
ŵƵƐƚďĞƌĞƐƉĞĐƞƵůĂŶĚŶŽƚƵŶĚĞƌŵŝŶĞƚŚĞĚŝŐŶŝƚLJŽĨ
ƚŚŽƐĞƌĞĐĞŝǀŝŶŐĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͘dŚŝƐŝƐĂůůƚŚĞŵŽƌĞĐƌŝƟĐĂů
ďĞĐĂƵƐĞƚŚŝƐĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŝƐŽŌĞŶƚŚĞĮƌƐƚƚŽƵĐŚƉŽŝŶƚ
of social services that many families encounter.
Exhibit 2 shows the percent of households across
income categories for Renton (including King County and
ƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂͿ͘ƐƚŚĞĐŚĂƌƚŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐ͕ŶĞĂƌůLJŽŶĞĮŌŚ
;ϭϵйͿŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐŚĂǀĞŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚŝŶĐŽŵĞƐŽĨ
ůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬƉĞƌLJĞĂƌ͘/ƚŝƐůŝŬĞůLJƚŚĂƚĂƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ
ϮϮй
ϭϭй
ϭϭй
ϭϲй
ϭϴй
ϴй
ϵй
ϯй
Ϯй
ϭϬй
ϵй
ϭϬй
ϭϱй
ϮϬй
ϭϯй
ϭϱй
ϱй
ϰй
ϵй
ϳй
ϴй
ϭϮй
ϭϳй
ϭϰй
ϭϴй
ϴй
ϴй
Ϭй ϱй ϭϬй ϭϱй ϮϬй Ϯϱй
hŶĚĞƌΨϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ
Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϮϰ͕ϵϵϵ
ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϯϰ͕ϵϵϵ
Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϰϵ͕ϵϵϵ
ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϳϰ͕ϵϵϵ
Ψϳϱ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϵϵ͕ϵϵϵ
ΨϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϭϰϵ͕ϵϵϵ
ΨϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϭϵϵ͕ϵϵϵ
DŽƌĞƚŚĂŶΨϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ <ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ
ZĞŶƚŽŶ
^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ
Exhibit 2
Household Income Segmentation, 2012
Source: King County estimate based on most recent ACS 1 year esti-
mate; Renton and Sunset estimate based on Esri estimates for 2012
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 8 of 85
5Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
June 2014
ƉŽƌƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞƐĞ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ ;ƉĂƌƟĐƵůĂƌůLJ ƚŚŽƐĞ ǁŝƚŚ
ĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶͿ ƐƚƌƵŐŐůĞ ƚŽ ŽďƚĂŝŶ ĞŶŽƵŐŚ ƚŽ ĞĂƚ ǁŝƚŚŽƵƚ
ŶƵƚƌŝƟŽŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ͘
Potential Indicators:
A direct measure of need for improved access to quality
ĨŽŽĚ ǁŽƵůĚ ďĞ ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ Žƌ ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐ ƌĞƉŽƌƟŶŐ ƚŚĂƚ
they do not have enough to eat, or that they have had
ƚŽŵĂŬĞƚƌĂĚĞŽīƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶĨŽŽĚĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌďĂƐŝĐŶĞĞĚƐ͘
An indirect measure is the number of families living in
ƉŽǀĞƌƚLJŽƌŶŽƚĞĂƌŶŝŶŐĞŶŽƵŐŚƚŽďĞƐĞůĨͲƐƵĸĐŝĞŶƚ͘
Day and night shelters for homeless families that
offer a range of services.
&ĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽŵĞůĞƐƐŶĞƐƐ ŝƐ Ă ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ƉƌŽďůĞŵ ŝŶ
King County. Families of all types are represented in
ƚŚĞ ŚŽŵĞůĞƐƐ ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ŵĂŶLJ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐŝŶŐ
homelessness are largely invisible from the public view.
Service providers report that homelessness is poorly
understood by the community and its leaders.
The basic need is adequate shelter. The service
responses to this need varies from emergency shelters
for families and individuals to more comprehensive
case management approaches designed to support
ƚƌĂŶƐŝƟŽŶƐ ŝŶƚŽ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚ͕ ƐƚĂďůĞ͕ ŚĞĂůƚŚLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
The desired future is that all families have safe, healthy
housing that they can maintain.
In Renton, services for those who are unsheltered –
in other words, individuals and families who have no
place to go during the day or night – is a priority human
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ŶĞĞĚ͘ dŚŝƐ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ ĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐ ĂŶĚ
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƚŽĨƵŶĐƟŽŶŝŶŵŽĚĞƌŶůŝĨĞƐƵĐŚĂƐ
showers, laundry, the ability to store food and personal
belongings, a mailing address, a place to receive phone
ĂŶĚ ĞŵĂŝů ŵĞƐƐĂŐĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ŽƚŚĞƌ ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƟǀĞ
services to address the severe economic hardship many
ŚŽŵĞůĞƐƐĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐĨĂĐĞ͘DŽƌĞĞĸĐŝĞŶƚĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚ
access to shelters is also a need, including a central
ůŽĐĂƟŽŶĨŽƌŝŶƚĂŬĞ͘
Potential Indicators:
Unsheltered and sheltered homeless counts.
ZĞŶƚŽŶ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚDĐ<ŝŶŶĞLJͲsĞŶƚŽͲƋƵĂůŝĮĞĚ
students.
ǀŝĐƟŽŶĐŽƵƌƚĮůŝŶŐƐĂƐĂůĞĂĚŝŶŐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
instability.
School enrollment turnover rate.
211 calls for shelter or emergency housing assistance
from Renton residents.
Increased services to help prevent homelessness, to
help families stay in their homes.
>ŽƐƐŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝƐĂŚŝŐŚůLJĚŝƐƌƵƉƟǀĞĂŶĚĚĂŵĂŐŝŶŐ
ĞǀĞŶƚĨŽƌĂŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ͕ŽŌĞŶƉƌĞĐĞĚĞĚďLJŽƚŚĞƌĚŝĸĐƵůƚ
ĞǀĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƌĞĚƵĐƟŽŶŝŶŝŶĐŽŵĞ͕ĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶŚĞĂůƚŚ
ƐƚĂƚƵƐ͕ŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŶĨĂŵŝůLJĐŽŵƉŽƐŝƟŽŶ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ
to the scarcity of available, quality housing for many
families, housing insecurity leading to homelessness
ŝƐĂƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚƉƌŽďůĞŵŝŶZĞŶƚŽŶ͘^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ
report a great deal of factors that can contribute to loss
ŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŵĞŶƚĂůŚĞĂůƚŚŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ĚŽŵĞƐƟĐ
ǀŝŽůĞŶĐĞ͕ůŽƐƐŽĨŝŶĐŽŵĞ͕ƌĞĚƵĐƟŽŶŽĨŝŶĐŽŵĞ͕ůŽƐƐ
ŽĨŚĞĂůƚŚ͕ĂŶĚĞǀŝĐƟŽŶ͘KŶĐĞĂĨĂŵŝůLJůŽƐĞƐŝƚƐŚŽŵĞ͕
ŝƚŝƐĨĂƌŵŽƌĞĐŽƐƚůLJĂŶĚĚŝĸĐƵůƚƚŽƌĞͲƐƚĂďŝůŝnjĞƚŚĞ
household.
Potential Indicators:
EƵŵďĞƌŽĨĞǀŝĐƟŽŶǁĂƌƌĂŶƚĮůŝŶŐƐ͘
211 calls related to housing
HEALTH & WELLNESS
,ĞĂůƚŚĂŶĚǁĞůůŶĞƐƐŝƐĨƵŶĚĂŵĞŶƚĂůƚŽƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨůŝĨĞ͕
and supersedes many of the social and economic needs
addressed in this assessment. The assessment takes
ĂƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽŚĞĂůƚŚĂŶĚǁĞůůŶĞƐƐƚŽŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ
ƚŚĞ ŚĞĂůƚŚ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ůĂƌŐĞƌ ƐLJƐƚĞŵ ŽĨ
human service needs. A dominant theme throughout
ƚŚĞƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬǁĂƐƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞŽĨĮŶĂŶĐŝĂů͕
geographic, and personal obstacles to adequate health
care that many individuals and families face.
Better access to health and dental care for low-
income residents.
ĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŚĞĂůƚŚĂŶĚĚĞŶƚĂůĐĂƌĞĂƌĞĐƌŝƟĐĂůĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ
of overall health and well-being. In Renton, many low-
ŝŶĐŽŵĞĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐʹƉĂƌƟĐƵůĂƌůLJƚŚŽƐĞǁŝƚŚŽƵƚDĞĚŝĐĂŝĚ
ʹĚŽŶŽƚŚĂǀĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŵĞĚŝĐĂůĐĂƌĞĚƵĞƚŽŝŶƐƵĸĐŝĞŶƚ
resources to pay for that care. Low-income families
ŽŌĞŶĚŽŶŽƚŚĂǀĞƚŚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƚŽƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞŚĞĂůƚŚ
insurance, which is largely provided through employers
ĂŶĚ͕ĞǀĞŶǁŝƚŚĞŵƉůŽLJĞƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ͕ĐĂŶďĞĐŽƐƚƉƌŽŚŝďŝƟǀĞ͘
Those who have income but do not qualify for Medicaid
ĂƌĞƉĂƌƟĐƵůĂƌůLJǀƵůŶĞƌĂďůĞĂŶĚĨŽƌĐĞĚƚŽƌĞůLJƐŽůĞůLJŽŶ
ĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJ ĐĂƌĞ ĨĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐ͘ /Ŷ ƐŽŵĞ ĐĂƐĞƐ͕ ĞǀĞŶ ƚŚŽƐĞ
ǁŝƚŚDĞĚŝĐĂŝĚĨĂĐĞĚŝĸĐƵůƟĞƐŝŶƌĞĐĞŝǀŝŶŐŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞ͕
ĂƐĚŽĐƚŽƌƐĐĂŶĐŚŽŽƐĞŶŽƚƚŽĂĐĐĞƉƚDĞĚŝĐĂŝĚƉĂƟĞŶƚƐ
ĚƵĞƚŽůŽǁĞƌĐŽŵƉĞŶƐĂƟŽŶƌĂƚĞƐ͘WŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞ
especially vulnerable include new immigrants to the
United States, children, and seniors.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 9 of 85
6 City of Renton | Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽĂŶŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽƉĂLJĨŽƌĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞ
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ŽƚŚĞƌďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
ĐĐĞƐƐ͕ĚƵĞƚŽůĂĐŬŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐĂŶĚ
ůŝŵŝƚĞĚŚŽƵƌƐ͘ZĞŶƚŽŶ͛ƐŵŽƐƚŶĞĞĚLJĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐŽŌĞŶ
do not own a vehicle and do not live near public
transit routes. Renton is lacking points of health care
ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞƚŽĂůĂƌŐĞŵĂũŽƌŝƚLJŽĨ
families in need.
&ŽƌůĂƌŐĞĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ͕ŐĞƫŶŐĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJŵĞĚŝĐĂůĐĂƌĞĨŽƌ
ŽŶĞƉĞƌƐŽŶŝŶƚŚĞĨĂŵŝůLJŝƐĚŝĸĐƵůƚĚƵĞƚŽĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞ
needs for other children.
Lack of knowledge about services in the community.
>ŝŵŝƚĞĚĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJĨŽƌĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘
&ŽƌƚŚŽƐĞǁŚŽĂƌĞĞůŝŐŝďůĞ͕ŶĂǀŝŐĂƟŶŐƚŚĞƐLJƐƚĞŵ
ŽĨŚĞĂůƚŚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂƉƉůLJŝŶŐĨŽƌƐƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĚ
ŚĞĂůƚŚĐŽǀĞƌĂŐĞ͕ĐĂŶďĞĐŚĂůůĞŶŐŝŶŐĂŶĚƟŵĞͲ
ĐŽŶƐƵŵŝŶŐ͘dŚŝƐŽďƐƚĂĐůĞŝƐŵĂĚĞŵŽƌĞĚŝĸĐƵůƚďLJ
cultural and language barriers.
,ĞĂůƚŚĂƌĞZĞĨŽƌŵǁŝůůŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞƚŽ
those for whom cost is the main obstacle.
Potential Indicators:
Indicators of access to health care include points of
health care service and the hours of availability. An
ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌ ŽĨ ĮŶĂŶĐŝĂů ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ ŚĞĂůƚŚ ĐĂƌĞ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ
ƚŚŽƐĞƌĞƉŽƌƟŶŐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞLJĐŽƵůĚŶŽƚƐĞĞĂĚŽĐƚŽƌĚƵĞƚŽ
ĐŽƐƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĂĚƵůƚƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶƚŚĂƚŝƐ
uninsured. Exhibit 3 ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐƚŚĞŵŽƐƚƌĞĐĞŶƚ;ϮϬϭϮͿ
ĚĂƚĂŽŶƚŚĞƐĞĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐŽĨĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ
health care.
Early childhood screenings and parenting support.
/ŶtĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ͕ƉƌĞŐŶĂŶƚǁŽŵĞŶŚĂǀĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽDĞĚŝĐĂŝĚ
to cover the costs of medical care through pregnancy and
ĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ƚŚĞƌĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJĞdžŝƐƚƐĂƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐŐĂƉ
for early childhood assessment and screening between
Medicaid eligibility and when children enter the public
school system. As a result, many children who need and
ĂƌĞĞŶƟƚůĞĚƚŽĞĂƌůLJŝŶƚĞƌǀĞŶƟŽŶƐĨŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂů͕
language, or learning delays are receiving none of
ƚŚĞƐĞ ďĞŶĞĮƚƐ ŶŽƌ ƚŚĞ ŐĞŶĞƌĂů ďĞŶĞĮƚƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĐĂŶ ďĞ
ŐĂŝŶĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƉĂƌĞŶƟŶŐĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ͘ ĂƌůLJ
ŝŶƚĞƌǀĞŶƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌ ǀƵůŶĞƌĂďůĞ ŝŶĨĂŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ƚŽĚĚůĞƌƐ ĂƌĞ
ŵŽƌĞĞīĞĐƟǀĞĂŶĚůĞƐƐĐŽƐƚůLJƚŚĂŶŝŶƚĞƌǀĞŶƟŽŶƐƚŚĂƚ
ŽĐĐƵƌůĂƚĞƌ͕ĂŶĚĐĂŶƵůƟŵĂƚĞůLJƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞŝŶĐŝĚĞŶĐĞŽĨ
ĨƵƚƵƌĞƉƌŽďůĞŵƐŝŶĂĐŚŝůĚ͛ƐďĞŚĂǀŝŽƌ͕ůĞĂƌŶŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚŚĞĂůƚŚ
ƐƚĂƚƵƐ͘ tŝƚŚŽƵƚ ĞĂƌůLJŝŶƚĞƌǀĞŶƟŽŶ ĂŶĚ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ͕ ŵŽƌĞ
cost and intensive services are needed to remediate
issues at later ages.
/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽĐŽƐƚĂŶĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ
ƚŽďĞŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚďLJĂŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂů͕ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ
report non-material obstacles such as a lack of culturally-
competent providers, language barriers, and familiarity
with available services.
Potential Indicators:
A direct measure of the children who are receiving early
childhood screenings would be the number of 1 – 4 year
olds receiving annual medical assessments. For many,
ƚŚĞĚŽŵŝŶĂŶƚŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƚŽƌĞĐĞŝǀŝŶŐƉƌĞǀĞŶƚĂƟǀĞŵĞĚŝĐĂů
exams is cost; therefore, the number of 1 – 4 year olds
not covered by health insurance can act as a proxy.
More mental health and substance abuse services.
YƵĂŶƟĨLJŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ ŵĞŶƚĂů ŚĞĂůƚŚ Žƌ
substance abuse services is a common challenge
ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĚ ŝŶ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚ ƚŚĞ hŶŝƚĞĚ
States. Service providers report there is a great unmet
need for mental health services in Renton, though it is
unclear how many persons need, but do not have, access
to mental health services.
DĞĞƟŶŐƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚŽƐĞƐƵīĞƌŝŶŐĨƌŽŵŵĞŶƚĂůŝůůŶĞƐƐ
is all the more challenging because mental illness is
poorly understood within the community and amongst
its leaders. There is much work to be done in increasing
Exhibit 3
Population with Access to Health Care, 2012
Source: Public Health of Seattle & King County, King County City
Health Profile for Renton/Fairwood, December 2012
ϭϵй
ϭϮй
ϭϵй
ϱϲй
ϯϭй
ϮϮй
ϭϯй
ϮϮй
ϭϲй
ϭϬй
ϮϬй
ϱϴй
Ϯϴй
ϭϴй
ϭϱй
Ϯϯй
Ϭй ϭϬй ϮϬй ϯϬй ϰϬй ϱϬй ϲϬй ϳϬй
hŶŝŶƐƵƌĞĚ
;ĂŐĞϭϴͲϲϰͿ
ŽƵůĚŶŽƚƐĞĞĂĚŽĐƚŽƌϭнƚŝŵĞƐŝŶƉĂƐƚ
LJĞĂƌĚƵĞƚŽĐŽƐƚ
ŽĞƐŶŽƚŚĂǀĞĂƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůĚŽĐƚŽƌ
ŝĚŶŽƚŚĂǀĞĂĨůƵƐŚŽƚĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞƉĂƐƚ
LJĞĂƌ
EĞǀĞƌŚĂĚƉŶĞƵŵŽŶŝĂǀĂĐĐŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ
;ĂŐĞϲϱнͿ
EŽŵĂŵŵŽŐƌĂŵǁŝƚŚŝŶϮLJĞĂƌƐ
;ĂŐĞϱϬͲϳϰͿ
EŽWĂƉƚĞƐƚǁŝƚŚŝŶϯLJĞĂƌƐ
;ĂŐĞϮϭͲϲϱͿ
EŽĚĞŶƚĂůǀŝƐŝƚĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞƉĂƐƚLJĞĂƌ
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ
ZĞŶƚŽŶͬ&ĂŝƌǁŽŽĚ
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 10 of 85
7Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
June 2014
understanding about mental illness and service needs
ďĞĨŽƌĞƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞƚŚĞƉŽůŝƟĐĂůǁŝůůƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞŶĞĞĚ͘
Mental health is highly correlated with substance
abuse, and both are correlated with other social
problems, including child neglect, homelessness, and
underemployment. Those with mental health issues
ŽŌĞŶŚĂǀĞĂŵŽƌĞĚŝĸĐƵůƚƟŵĞŶĂǀŝŐĂƟŶŐƚŚĞƐŽĐŝĂů
services network. Providers and educators report that
mental illness is the cause of many other hardships that
ďĞĨĂůůĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƌĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŝŶƐƵĸĐŝĞŶƚ
ŝŶĐŽŵĞ͕ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚŶƵƚƌŝƟŽŶ͘
dŚĞƌĞ ŝƐ ŶĞĞĚ ĨŽƌ ŵŽƌĞ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƟǀĞ ĂŶĚ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚ
housing in Renton for those with mental health and
substance abuse issues, as well as a greater overall
ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕
ƚŚĞƌĞŝƐŶĞĞĚĨŽƌŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƟŽŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶŝƚLJ
ĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚďĞƩĞƌƐLJƐƚĞŵƐƚŽŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƚŚŽƐĞǁŚŽ
may be in need of mental health services or substance
abuse treatment, but are not currently receiving it.
Potential Indicators:
ďĞƩĞƌ͕ĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞƐLJƐƚĞŵŽĨƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐ
to health care will be necessary to have a direct measure
of mental service needs. Other measures that can act as
indirect proxies of the rate of mental health or substance
ĂďƵƐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
Disturbance arrests
Substance abuse arrests
Suicide rates
ŽŶƚĂĐƚƐǁŝƚŚĮƌƐƚƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞƌƐ
AVAILABLE, QUALITY
HOUSING
ǀĂŝůĂďůĞ͕ ƋƵĂůŝƚLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝƐ Ă ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ŶĞĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ
City of Renton. Many families are living in sub-standard
housing that is outdated or not designed to meet
ƚŚĞ ƉĂƌƟĐƵůĂƌ ŶĞĞĚƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞŝƌ ĨĂŵŝůLJ ŝŶ ƚĞƌŵƐ ŽĨ ƐŝnjĞ͕
ĐŽŶĮŐƵƌĂƟŽŶ͕ŽƌůŽĐĂƟŽŶ͘DĂŶLJĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐĂůƐŽƐƚƌƵŐŐůĞ
ĮŶĂŶĐŝĂůůLJƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚĞŝƌĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ĞŝƚŚĞƌĚƵĞ
ƚŽŝŶƐƵĸĐŝĞŶƚŝŶĐŽŵĞŽƌŚĞĂǀLJƌĞŶƚŽƌŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉĐŽƐƚƐ͘
&ĂŵŝůŝĞƐǁŝůůƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚĚĞďƚĂŶĚƌĞŶƚďƵƌĚĞŶƐ
in order to keep their home, knowing the loss of a
ŚŽŵĞŝƐƉƌŽĨŽƵŶĚůLJĚŝƐƌƵƉƟǀĞĂŶĚůŝŵŝƚƐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ
ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂů͕ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ͕ĂŶĚƐŽĐŝĂů͘
More rental units for those earning 30% of King
County median income.
The private housing market does not currently serve
Ăůů ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚƐ͘ dŚĞƌĞ ŝƐ Ă ƐŝnjĂďůĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶ ŽĨ
ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐŝŶĂůůĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƟĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ƚŚĂƚ
ĚŽŶŽƚŚĂǀĞƚŚĞŝŶĐŽŵĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƚŽĂīŽƌĚĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞ
housing at current market rents. For planning purposes,
ĐŽƵŶƚLJǁŝĚĞ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ ĚĞĮŶĞ ǀĞƌLJͲůŽǁ ŝŶĐŽŵĞ
housing needs as those earning less than 30 percent
of County median income. Using 30 percent of gross
ŵŽŶƚŚůLJŝŶĐŽŵĞĂƐĂďĞŶĐŚŵĂƌŬĨŽƌĂŶĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƌĞŶƚĂů
ƵŶŝƚ͕ĂŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚĞĂƌŶŝŶŐϯϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJ͛Ɛ
DĞĚŝĂŶ ƌĞĂ /ŶĐŽŵĞ ǁŽƵůĚ ďĞ ĂďůĞ ƚŽ ĂīŽƌĚ ΨϱϮϱͬ
month, an amount well below current market rents.
,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐŽĨĂůůƚLJƉĞƐĂƌĞƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ŶĞĞĚĐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗ƐĞŶŝŽƌƐ͕ƐŝŶŐůĞĂĚƵůƚƐ͕ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ
without children, families with children, and families
ǁŝƚŚ ŵƵůƟƉůĞ ŐĞŶĞƌĂƟŽŶƐ͘ /ŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ
to get quality housing for households in this income
ƌĂŶŐĞǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚLJƉĞƐŝŶůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ
throughout the City.
Potential Indicators:
EƵŵďĞƌŽĨƐƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐ
EƵŵďĞƌŽĨĞǀŝĐƟŽŶǁĂƌƌĂŶƚĮůŝŶŐƐ
More safe, energy efficient, and healthy housing for
low and moderate income households.
Using countywide planning policies as a guide, low and
moderate income households represent households
ǁŝƚŚ ĂŶŶƵĂů ŝŶĐŽŵĞ ƌĂŶŐĞƐ ĨƌŽŵ ΨϮϭ͕ϬϬϬ Ͳ Ψϱϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘
ZĞŶƚŽŶŚĂƐŵĂŶLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƚŽ
ƚŚĞƐĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŶĞĞĚ ĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ͘ ,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ ĞǀĞŶ ǁŝƚŚ
ZĞŶƚŽŶ͛Ɛ͞ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ͟ƐƵƉƉůLJ͕ŵĂŶLJŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐƐƚƌƵŐŐůĞ
ƚŽĂƩĂŝŶƋƵĂůŝƚLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŵĞĞƚƐƚŚĞŝƌŶĞĞĚƐ͘
DƵĐŚŽĨƚŚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƚŽĐŬĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƚŽƚŚŝƐƉŽƌƟŽŶŽĨ
ƚŚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŵĂƌŬĞƚŝƐŽůĚĞƌ͘dŚĞƐĞŚŽŵĞƐŽŌĞŶŚĂǀĞ
ŵŽůĚ͕ůĞĂĚƉĂŝŶƚ͕ĂƐďĞƐƚŽƐ͕ĂŶĚͬŽƌďĂĚĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůǁŝƌŝŶŐ͕
ǁŚŝĐŚŵĂŬĞƚŚĞŵƵŶƐĂĨĞĂŶĚƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůůLJƵŶŝŶŚĂďŝƚĂďůĞ͘
DĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞƐĞŚŽŵĞƐĂůƐŽůĂĐŬƚŚĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂƩƌŝďƵƚĞƐ
;Ğ͘Ő͘ ĞŶĞƌŐLJ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚ ǁŝŶĚŽǁƐ͕ ŝŶƐƵůĂƟŽŶͿ ƚŚĂƚ ŚĞůƉ
ĐŽŶƚƌŽůƵƟůŝƚLJĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŵŽŶƚŚůLJĐŽƐƚƐ͘ZĞŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ
into older housing is necessary to maintain quality
ĂŶĚ ĞŶĞƌŐLJ ĞĸĐŝĞŶĐLJ͖ ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ ǁŚĞƌĞ ƌĞŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ
drives up rents it can displace low to moderate-income
households. Most new housing in Renton, including
ďŽƚŚĂƩĂĐŚĞĚĂŶĚĚĞƚĂĐŚĞĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ŝƐŽƵƚŽĨƌĞĂĐŚƚŽ
ƚŚŝƐ ŵĂƌŬĞƚ ƐĞŐŵĞŶƚ͕ ĂŶĚ ĞīŽƌƚƐ ƚŽ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ƐƚŽĐŬŵƵƐƚĞŶĚĞĂǀŽƌƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĂƩĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJĨŽƌůŽǁƚŽ
moderate income households.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 11 of 85
8 City of Renton | Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
Other dimensions of housing need in this category
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
Larger units to accommodate large families.
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶĂƌĞĂƐƚŚĂƚĂůƐŽŽīĞƌĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂŶĚƐŽĐŝĂů
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ͘
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŚĂƐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐ͘ƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ͕
ŵƵĐŚŽĨƚŚĞĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƚŽĐŬŝƐŝŶĂƌĞĂƐ
ǁŝƚŚƉŽŽƌƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŽƉƟŽŶƐ͕
forcing low and moderate income households to
ƚƌĂĚĞŚŝŐŚĞƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĐŽƐƚƐĨŽƌůŽǁĞƌƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ
costs and vice versa.
Potential Indicators:
Persons per room as an indicator of overcrowding.
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƚŽĐŬƌĂƚĞĚ͞ŐŽŽĚ͟ďLJƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJƐƐĞƐƐŽƌŝŶ
various value categories.
HOUSING NEED CATEGORIES
dŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͛ƐŐŽĂůƐŝŶĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƋƵĂůŝƚLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƟŽŶƐ͕ƚŚĞEĞĞĚƐƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚĚƌĂǁƐŽŶƚŚĞŝŶĐŽŵĞĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ
ƐƉĞĐŝĮĞĚŝŶ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ͛ƐŽƵŶƚLJǁŝĚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͘dŚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐĂƌĞĚĞĮŶĞĚĂƐƌĂƟŽƐŽĨƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJ͛ƐƌĞĂ
DĞĚŝĂŶ/ŶĐŽŵĞ;D/Ϳ͘dŚĞĚĂƚĂƌĞŇĞĐƚƐŝŶĐŽŵĞĨŽƌĂůůŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐƌĞŐĂƌĚůĞƐƐŽĨƐŝnjĞ͘
Very-low Income Housing Need. ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŵĞƐϯϬйŽĨD/ŽƌůĞƐƐŚĂǀĞĂŶĞƐƟŵĂƚĞĚĂŶŶƵĂůŝŶĐŽŵĞƵƉƚŽ
ΨϮϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘dŚŝƐŝƐƚŚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚĐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJŵŽƐƚƵŶŵĞƚďLJŵĂƌŬĞƚĨŽƌĐĞƐĂŶĚĨŽƌǁŚŝĐŚũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶƐŵƵƐƚĞŵƉůŽLJƉŽůŝĐLJ
ĂŶĚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŽůƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝƐĂƩĂŝŶĂďůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͘ŽƵŶƚLJǁŝĚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƐƵŐŐĞƐƚƚŚĂƚϭϮйŽĨĂ
ũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶ͛ƐƚŽƚĂůŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƵƉƉůLJƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƚŽƚŚĞƐĞŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͘
Low Income Housing Need. ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŵĞƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶϯϬĂŶĚϱϬйŽĨD/ŚĂǀĞŝŶĐŽŵĞƐƚŚĂƚƌĂŶŐĞĨƌŽŵΨϮϭ͕ϬϬϬ
ƚŽΨϯϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ŽƵŶƚLJǁŝĚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐWŽůŝĐŝĞƐƐƵŐŐĞƐƚƚŚĂƚϭϮйŽĨũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶƐ͛ƚŽƚĂůŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƵƉƉůLJďĞĂƩĂŝŶĂďůĞƚŽŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ
in this income range.
Moderate Income Housing Need. ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŵĞƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶϱϬĂŶĚϴϬйŽĨD/ŚĂǀĞĂŶŶƵĂůŝŶĐŽŵĞƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶ
Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬĂŶĚΨϱϲ͕ϬϬϬ͘ŽƵŶƚLJtŝĚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐWŽůŝĐĞƐƐƵŐŐĞƐƚϭϲйŽĨũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶ͛ƐƚŽƚĂůŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƵƉƉůLJďĞĂƩĂŝŶĂďůĞƚŽ
households in this
income range.
To assess the degree to
ǁŚŝĐŚ ZĞŶƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ
ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƚŽĐŬŝƐŵĞĞƟŶŐƚŚĞ
ůŽĐĂů ĚĞŵĂŶĚ ĨŽƌ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ
ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ĂŶĚ ƐĂƟƐĨLJŝŶŐ ŝƚƐ
ŽďůŝŐĂƟŽŶ ĨŽƌ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ
housing in the region, the
analysis compares the
number of renter households
in each housing need category
to the number of units being
ƌĞŶƚĞĚĂƚƉƌŝĐĞƐĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƚŽ
that category.
^ĞůĨͲƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƌĞŶƚƐƌĞŇĞĐƚǁŚĂƚŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐƉĂLJ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĂŶLJĚŝƐĐŽƵŶƚƐŽƌƐƵďƐŝĚŝĞƐ͘&ŽƌĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ZĞŶƚŽŶ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJ͕
ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚƌĞŶƚǀŽƵĐŚĞƌƐƉŽƌƚĞĚŝŶĨƌŽŵŽƚŚĞƌƉƵďůŝĐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƟĞƐ͕ƐƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϭ͕ϳϬϬƵŶŝƚƐŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶ
ZĞŶƚŽŶ͘dŚĞƐĞƐƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĚƵŶŝƚƐůŝŬĞůLJĂĐĐŽƵŶƚĨŽƌĂůĂƌŐĞƉŽƌƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐƚŚĂƚƌĞƉŽƌƚƉĂLJŝŶŐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶΨϱϮϱƉĞƌŵŽŶƚŚ
ŝŶƌĞŶƚ͘dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĂůƐŽŽƚŚĞƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƵďƐŝĚŝĞƐ͕ĂƚŵƵĐŚƐŵĂůůĞƌƐĐĂůĞƐ͕ŽīĞƌĞĚďLJŽƚŚĞƌŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐ͘ĐĐŽƵŶƟŶŐĨŽƌĂůůƚŚĞ
ŶŽŶͲŵĂƌŬĞƚĨĂĐƚŽƌƐƚŚĂƚŵĂLJƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞƌĞŶƚĂŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƉĂLJƐ͕ƚŚĞŐĂƉĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŵĂƌŬĞƚŝƐŶŽƚŵĞĞƟŶŐ
ƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞsĞƌLJͲůŽǁ/ŶĐŽŵĞ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ;ϯϬйŽĨ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJD/Ϳ͘WŽůŝĐLJĂŶĚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŽůƐǁŝůůďĞ
ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞĂƩĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĨŽƌŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐĞĂƌŶŝŶŐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϯϬйŽĨƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJŵĞĚŝĂŶŝŶĐŽŵĞ͘dŚĞŐĂƉ
ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐĂůƐŽƐƵŐŐĞƐƚƐƚŚĂƚZĞŶƚŽŶŚĂƐĂĂŶŽǀĞƌƐƵƉƉůLJŽĨƌĞŶƚĂůƵŶŝƚƐĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƚŽƚŚŽƐĞĞĂƌŶŝŶŐďĞƚǁĞĞŶϯϬйĂŶĚϴϬйŽĨ
ŽƵŶƚLJŵĞĚŝĂŶŝŶĐŽŵĞ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŵĂLJƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĚĞŵĂŶĚĨŽƌĞŶƚƌLJͲůĞǀĞůŚŽŵĞŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ͘
ZĂƚŝŽƚŽ
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJD/ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚ 'ĂƉ
ΨϳϬ͕ϱϲϳ >Žǁ ,ŝŐŚ >Žǁ ,ŝŐŚ ŽƵŶƚ WĞƌĐĞŶƚ hŶŝƚƐ ŽǀĞƌͬ;ƵŶĚĞƌͿ
hŶĚĞƌϯϬй ΨϬ ΨϮϭ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϬ ΨϱϮϱ ϯ͕ϯϭϴ Ϯϭй ϭ͕ϭϴϭ ;Ϯ͕ϭϯϳͿ
ϯϬͲϱϬй ΨϮϭ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϱϮϱ Ψϴϳϱ Ϯ͕ϲϮϱ ϭϳй ϯ͕ϳϵϲ ϭ͕ϭϳϬ
ϱϬͲϴϬй Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϱϲ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϴϳϱ Ψϭ͕ϰϬϬ ϯ͕ϯϴϬ ϮϮй ϳ͕ϲϵϭ ϰ͕ϯϭϭ
ϴϬͲϭϬϬй Ψϱϲ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϳϭ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϰϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϳϳϱ Ϯ͕ϭϰϲ ϭϰй ϭ͕ϳϳϲ ;ϯϳϬͿ
ϭϬϬͲϭϮϬй Ψϳϭ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϴϱ͕ϬϬϬ Ψϭ͕ϳϳϱ ΨϮ͕ϭϮϱ ϭ͕ϯϰϴ ϵй ϯϭϰ ;ϭ͕ϬϯϰͿ
ϭϮϬйŽƌKǀĞƌ Ψϴϱ͕ϬϬϬ ΨϮ͕ϭϮϱ ΨϬ Ϯ͕ϵϬϰ ϭϴй ϲϲϴ ;Ϯ͕ϮϯϲͿ
dŽƚĂů ϭϱ͕ϳϮϭ ϭϱ͕ϰϮϲ
v +DŽŶƚŚůLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
/ŶĐŽŵĞZĂŶŐĞƐ ƵĚŐĞƚΎ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚZĞŶƚĞƌ,,Ɛ
Source: American Community Survey, 2007 - 2011 5-year estimates; BERK, 2013. Figures may exceed total due to
rounding.
Renton Rental Unit Gap Analysis
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 12 of 85
9Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
June 2014
NEIGHBORHOOD
OPPORTUNITY
EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƌĞŇĞĐƚƐĂƉĞƌƐŽŶŽƌĨĂŵŝůLJ͛Ɛ
ĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐƚŚĞLJŶĞĞĚ
to lead socially and economically successful lives. In
ĂůŵŽƐƚĂůůĐŝƟĞƐ͕ĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐĂƌĞ
ĚƌŝǀĞŶďLJƚŚĞĂƩĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƟŽŶƐŝŶĚŝīĞƌĞŶƚ
neighborhoods, and as a result are geographically
unequally distributed. This results in uneven access and
ĨƵŶĐƟŽŶĂůďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ͘
Improved mobility and transportation options.
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶĂŶĚŵŽďŝůŝƚLJĂƌĞŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ
of all forms of opportunity. Mobility barriers, such as lack
ŽĨƐĂĨĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƉĂƚŚǁĂLJƐŽƌĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƟŽŶĨŽƌƚŚŽƐĞ
ůŝǀŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƟĞƐ͕ĐƌĞĂƚĞŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐĨŽƌŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐ
ĂŶĚĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐƚŽĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŚĞLJŶĞĞĚƚŽĨƵŶĐƟŽŶ
ŝŶŵŽĚĞƌŶůŝĨĞ͘ZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ůŝŬĞŵĂŶLJƐƵďƵƌďĂŶĐŝƟĞƐ͕ŶĞĞĚƐ
ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚŵŽďŝůŝƚLJĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐ͘
&Žƌ Ă ĨĂŵŝůLJ ǁŝƚŚ ǀĞƌLJ ůŝƩůĞ ŝŶĐŽŵĞ͕ ůĂĐŬ ŽĨ ŵŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĐĂŶ ůŝŵŝƚ Ă
ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ͛ƐĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽŽďƚĂŝŶďĂƐŝĐŐŽŽĚƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕
ƌĞĐĞŝǀĞŵĞĚŝĐĂůŽƌĚĞŶƚĂůĐĂƌĞ͕ĐŽŵŵƵƚĞƚŽĂũŽď͕ĂŶĚ
maintain employment.
ƵƌƌĞŶƚďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐŝŶZĞŶƚŽŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
Renton has uneven access to public transit, with
ůŝŵŝƚĞĚŽƉƟŽŶƐĨŽƌƚŚŽƐĞǁŚŽĚŽŶŽƚůŝǀĞĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͕
ĚŽŶŽƚĐŽŵŵƵƚĞĚƵƌŝŶŐƉĞĂŬƚƌĂǀĞůƟŵĞƐ͕ŽƌǁŚŽ
need to travel within Renton (instead of between
ZĞŶƚŽŶĂŶĚƉŽŝŶƚƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ͘dŚŝƐŶĞŐĂƟǀĞůLJ
impacts mobility for all residents, but is especially
ƉƌŽďůĞŵĂƟĐĨŽƌŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐĂŶĚĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐǁŚŽĚŽŶŽƚ
have access to a vehicle. The most vulnerable groups
include low-income households who are unable to
ĂīŽƌĚǀĞŚŝĐůĞŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐǁŚŽ
are unable to drive.
Elderly residents and those with personal mobility
impairments are unable to walk to and from a bus
ƐƚŽƉ͕ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌůŝŵŝƟŶŐƚŚĞŝƌŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐƚŽƵƐĞƉƵďůŝĐ
transit.
DĂŶLJƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝŬĞƌŽƵƚĞƐĐŽŶŶĞĐƟŶŐZĞŶƚŽŶ͛Ɛ
ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂůĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚďĂƐŝĐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂƌĞƵŶƐĂĨĞ͕
ǁŚŝĐŚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌůŝŵŝƚƐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƟǀĞƐĨŽƌ
households without a vehicle.
Potential Indicators:
Opportunity for mobility is a wide-ranging topic with
ŵƵůƟƉůĞ ĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶƐ ŽĨ ͞ĂĐĐĞƐƐ͟ ʹ ƉŚLJƐŝĐĂů ĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕
ĮŶĂŶĐŝĂů ĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘ dŽ ďĞƩĞƌ
understand the geographic determinants of Mobility
Opportunity in King County, the Puget Sound Regional
ŽƵŶĐŝů ;W^ZͿ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚ ĂŶ ŝŶĚĞdž ŽĨ DŽďŝůŝƚLJ
KƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJďĂƐĞĚŽŶ͗
dransƉortaƟon cost. The cost of the average
ĐŽŵŵƵƚĞƚŽǁŽƌŬĂƚΨϬ͘ϱϬƉĞƌŵŝůĞ͘
Transit cost. The cost of the average transit fare.
Access to transit. The percentage of the total area
ƚŚĂƚŝƐǁŝƚŚŝŶϭͬϰͲŵŝůĞŽĨĂŶ džƉƌĞƐƐƵƐ^ƚŽƉ͘
Walkability. The percentage of workers who walk to
work.
dŚĞ W^Z dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶͬDŽďŝůŝƚLJ ^ĐŽƌĞ ŝƐ Ă ƵƐĞĨƵů
ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌŽĨƚŚĞƌĞůĂƟǀĞƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶƚŚĂƚŚĂƐ
high mobility opportunity. Exhibit 4 on the next page
ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶ ŽĨ ZĞŶƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ĐĞŶƐƵƐ
tracts into low opportunity and high opportunity areas.
W^Z͛Ɛ KƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ /ŶĚĞdž ĚŽĞƐ ŶŽƚ ĂĐĐŽƵŶƚ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ
safety of sidewalks and bike routes. A direct indicator for
the safety of bike and pedestrian routes would be miles
of improved sidewalk and bike routes.
More high quality out-of-school time opportunities
for youth.
Service providers note that there is a lack of free, high
ƋƵĂůŝƚLJ ŽƵƚͲŽĨͲƐĐŚŽŽů ƟŵĞ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĨŽƌ LJŽƵƚŚ ŝŶ
ZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐƚŚĂƚĞŶŐĂŐĞ
LJŽƵƚŚƚŽůĞĂƌŶĂŶĚƉƌĂĐƟĐĞƐŽĐŝĂůƐŬŝůůƐƚŚĂƚůĞĂĚƚŽůŝĨĞ
and academic success. Youth development programs
can deter delinquent behavior such as gang involvement
ĂŶĚĚƌƵŐƵƐĞ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚĞƌĞŝƐĂŶƵŶŵĞƚŶĞĞĚĨŽƌŽƵƚͲ
ŽĨͲƐĐŚŽŽůŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĨŽƌĂůůLJŽƵƚŚ͕LJŽƵƚŚĨƌŽŵůŽǁͲ
ŝŶĐŽŵĞ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ ĨĂĐĞ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů ďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ
ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐƐĞƚŽĨŽƉƟŽŶƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĂŌĞƌƐĐŚŽŽůƐƉŽƌƚƐƚĞĂŵƐ͘
&ŽƌƚŚĞƐĞLJŽƵƚŚ͕ĐŽƐƚŽĨƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶ͕ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶ͕
and opportunity costs to the household (such as youth
employment and the childcare the youth provide to
ŽƚŚĞƌĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶŝŶƚŚĞĨĂŵŝůLJͿĂƌĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶ͘
/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĨŽƌLJŽƵƚŚ͕ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ
ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐƌĞƉŽƌƚƉĞƌĐĞƉƟŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚLJŽƵƚŚ
among some members of the community.
Potential Indicators:
Number of 13 – 19 year olds living in low-income
households.
zŽƵƚŚƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶƌĂƚĞƐŝŶ<ͲϭϮƐƉŽƌƚƐĂŶĚĂƌƚƐ
programs.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 13 of 85
10 City of Renton | Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
Increased access to affordable, quality early
childhood education.
ĂƌůLJ ĐŚŝůĚŚŽŽĚ ĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ ŝƐ ĂŶ ĞīĞĐƟǀĞ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐLJ ƚŽ
ensure that all children arrive to Kindergarten ready to
ůĞĂƌŶ͘dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞϭϵůŝĐĞŶƐĞĚĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞĐĞŶƚĞƌƐĂŶĚϴϬ
licensed family child care programs in Renton (February
ϮϬϭϰͿ͕ ƚŚŽƵŐŚ ŶŽŶĞ ŚĂǀĞ ƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚ YƵĂůŝƚLJ >ĞǀĞů ŽĨ
džĐĞůůĞŶĐĞ ƌĂƟŶŐ ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐ ƚŽ ŚŝůĚ ĂƌĞ ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞ͛Ɛ
Early Achievers program. The children who have the
ŵŽƐƚƚŽŐĂŝŶĨƌŽŵƋƵĂůŝƚLJĞĂƌůLJůĞĂƌŶŝŶŐĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶŽŌĞŶ
ĨĂĐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗
Some families lack knowledge of where quality
childcare programs are.
dŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƌͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJĞĂƌůLJůĞĂƌŶŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŽŌĞŶŚĂǀĞ
waitlists.
Cost is a barrier for many low-income families.
Some families have cultural or religious preferences
ƚŚĂƚŵŽƐƚĞĂƌůLJĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞĐĞŶƚĞƌƐĚŽ
not meet.
Parents can work atypical hours that are not
accommodated by standard childcare centers.
DĂŶLJĞĂƌůLJĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞĐĞŶƚĞƌƐĂƌĞŶŽƚ
able to accommodate disabled or special needs
children.
Service providers report a shortage of quality early
ĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐŝŶZĞŶƚŽŶ͘
Potential Indicators:
ƐŽĨϮϬϭϬ͕ƚŚĞƌĞǁĞƌĞĂŶĞƐƟŵĂƚĞĚϯ͕ϳϬϬƉƌĞƐĐŚŽŽů
Ͳ ĂŐĞĚ ĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶ ŝŶ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ;ĞŶƐƵƐ͕ ϮϬϭϬͿ͘ ,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕
licensed child care capacity in Renton only amounts to
ϭ͕ϯϲϵƐůŽƚƐ͕ĂƐƐŚŽǁŶŝŶExhibit 5, ŝŶĚŝĐĂƟŶŐĂƐŚŽƌƚĂŐĞ
of slots to meet local demand.
Exhibit 4
PSRC Transportation/Mobility Opportunity Rating, 2011
W^ZKƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJZĂƚŝŶŐ
;ďLJĞŶƐƵƐdƌĂĐƚͿ ZĞŶƚŽŶ
ϭ>ŽǁKƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ ϯϵй
Ϯ ϯϬй
ϯ Ϭй
ϰ ϮϮй
ϱ,ŝŐŚKƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ ϵй
dŽƚĂůηŽĨdƌĂĐƚƐ Ϯϯ
Source: PSRC, 2012; BERK, 2013
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 14 of 85
11Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
June 2014
ƐƟŵĂƟŶŐ ƚŚĞ ŶĞĞĚ ĨŽƌ ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂů ĞĂƌůLJ ĐŚŝůĚŚŽŽĚ
ĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐŝƐĚŝĸĐƵůƚ͕ĂƐŵĂŶLJĨƌŝĞŶĚƐ͕ĨĂŵŝůLJ
and neighbors provide quality early learning environments
for young children and many day care providers are not
registered. Some indirect measures of whether need is
ďĞŝŶŐŵĞƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
tĂŝƚůŝƐƚƐĨŽƌ,ĞĂĚ^ƚĂƌƚĂŶĚ ĂƌůLJŚŝůĚŚŽŽĚĂŶĚ
ƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞWƌŽŐƌĂŵ; WͿĐĂŶƌĞǀĞĂůƵŶŵĞƚŶĞĞĚ
ŽĨůŽǁĞƌŝŶĐŽŵĞŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐĨŽƌĞĂƌůLJĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂů
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ͘
dŽƚĂůŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞƐůŽƚƐŝŶĐĞŶƚĞƌƐƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŶŐ
in Early Achievers can reveal the quality of childcare
service supply.
APPENDICES
ϭ͘ĂƐĞůŝŶĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŶĚŝƟŽŶƐ
2. Variables and Data Sources
3. Renton and Sunset Area Demographic Tables
>ŝĐĞŶƐĞĚŚŝůĚĂƌĞĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ
;ϯͲϱLJĞĂƌŽůĚƐŶŽƚLJĞƚŝŶŬŝŶĚĞƌŐĂƌƚĞŶͿ ϭ͕ϯϲϵ
ŚŝůĚĂƌĞĞŶƚĞƌ ϲϵϱ
&ĂŵŝůLJŚŝůĚĂƌĞĞŶƚĞƌ ϲϳϰ
ŝĨĨĞƌĞŶĐĞ Ϯ͕ϯϯϭ
Exhibit 5
Estimate of Renton Licensed Day Care Capacity, 2014
Source: Child Care Resources, 2014; BERK, 2014
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 15 of 85
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 16 of 85
1Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
Sunset Area Addendum
CITY OF RENTON
Community Needs Assessment for
Human Services and Housing
Sunset Area Addendum
June 2014
INTRODUCTION
The Sunset Area (shown to the right) is an ethnically
diverse, low-income neighborhood in the City of Renton.
It includes the City’s largest public housing community,
^ƵŶƐĞƚ dĞƌƌĂĐĞ͕ ĂŶĚ ŝƐ Ă ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ƌĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƟŽŶ
priority. Since the late 1990s, the City has focused on
this area for targeted improvement and investment and
ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚŝƚƐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͕ĐŽŶƟŶƵĞƐƚŽƐĞĞŬŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ
for coordinated redevelopment driven by a community
vision.
The City of Renton’s Community Needs Assessment for
,ƵŵĂŶ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚƚŚŝƌƚĞĞŶƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJ
human services and housing needs. This document
ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐ Ă ĐůŽƐĞƌ ůŽŽŬ Ăƚ ƚŚĞƐĞ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJ ŶĞĞĚƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ
Sunset Area.
Neighborhood Background
The Sunset Area is a small neighborhood located east of
/ͲϰϬϱŝŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƉĂƌƚŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ǁŝƚŚĂŶĞƐƟŵĂƚĞĚ
ϮϬϭϮƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶŽĨϮ͕ϳϴϬƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘/ƚĮƌƐƚƐĂǁƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ
development in the 1940s, with the building of more
ƚŚĂŶϯ͕ϬϬϬŵŽĚĞƐƚŚŽŵĞƐ;ŵĂŶLJŽĨǁŚŝĐŚĂƌĞƐƟůůŝŶ
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 17 of 85
2 City of Renton | Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
Sunset Area Addendum
ƵƐĞƚŽĚĂLJͿƚŽŚŽƵƐĞǁŽƌŬĞƌƐĂƚŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌŝŶŐƉůĂŶƚƐ
ŝŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨƚŚĞǁĂƌĞīŽƌƚ͘dŽĚĂLJ͕ƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂŝƐ
a diverse, low-income community with lower housing
ĐŽƐƚƐ͕ƉŽŽƌĞƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͕ĂŶĚĨĞǁĞƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƟŽŶƐ
than much of Renton.
Community Revitalization Program
Renton is currently developing the Sunset Area
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƟŽŶ WƌŽŐƌĂŵ͕ ǁŚŝĐŚ ĂŝŵƐ
to catalyze private property development, create
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĨŽƌŵĂƌŬĞƚͲƌĂƚĞĂŶĚ ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕
ĂŶĚƐƟŵƵůĂƚĞƌĞƚĂŝůŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ͘dŚĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ
Ă ŶƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ ƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
improvements. The City believes the Sunset Area has
ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ŵĂƌŬĞƚ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ďĞĐĂƵƐĞ ŝƚ ŚĂƐ ƌĞůĂƟǀĞůLJ
ƐƚƌŽŶŐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ĂĐŽŶǀĞŶŝĞŶƚůŽĐĂƟŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ
ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐ͘
APPROACH
Publically Available Data. To enable the needs
ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ƚŽ ďĞ ƵƉĚĂƚĞĚ ŽǀĞƌ ƟŵĞ͕ ƚŚĞ ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ
ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞƐƉƵďůŝĐĂůůLJĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞĚĂƚĂ͘dŚĞ
assessment team reviewed basic demographic and
community data available from the U.S. Census Bureau
as well as an array of regional data sources. Much of
ƚŚĞ ƉĞƌƟŶĞŶƚ ĚĂƚĂ ŝƐ ŶŽƚ ƉƵďůŝƐŚĞĚ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ
ŐĞŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐ ďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ^ƵŶƐĞƚ ƌĞĂ͘ KŶ ŬĞLJ
ĚĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƟĐƐ͕ƚŚĞĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐƵƐĞƐĞƐƟŵĂƚĞƐ
ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚďLJ Ɛƌŝ͕ĂƐƉĂƟĂůĚĂƚĂǀĞŶĚŽƌ͘/ŶŽƚŚĞƌĐĂƐĞƐ͕
ƚŚĞ ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ ĐŽŵƉĂƌĞƐ ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ ƐƚĂƟƐƟĐƐ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ
two Census Tracts most associated with the Sunset Area
boundaries. The associated census tracts comprise a
much larger area than the Sunset Area and themselves
are not homogenous. For these reasons, Sunset Area
dƌĂĐƚ ĞƐƟŵĂƚĞƐ ůŝŬĞůLJ ƵŶĚĞƌƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚ ĚŝīĞƌĞŶĐĞ ĂŶĚ
ĚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶĂůŝƚLJĨƌŽŵƐƚĂƟƐƟĐƐĨŽƌZĞŶƚŽŶ͘^ĞĞƚŚĞŝƚLJ
of Renton Community Needs Assessment for Human
Services and Housing for the full list of data variables.
The Renton Housing Authority (RHA) and its partners
plan to conduct a community survey neighborhood
residents in the coming year as part of the City and RHA’s
ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶĨŽƌĂ,hŚŽŝĐĞEĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ/ŶŝƟĂƟǀĞ
/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ ŐƌĂŶƚ͘ dŚĞ ŐƌĂŶƚ ǁŽƵůĚ ŚĞůƉ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ
ƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƟŽŶĞīŽƌƚ͘&ƵƚƵƌĞ
ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐLJƐĞƫŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞƐƐŚŽƵůĚ
ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌ ƐƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƟŶŐ ƚŚŝƐ ŶĞĞĚƐ ĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ
ĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƟŽŶĨƌŽŵŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐ͘
Stakeholder outreach and engagement. The assessment
process included targeted program interviews, provider
and resident focus groups, a visioning session with
ZĞŶƚŽŶ͛Ɛ ,ƵŵĂŶ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĚǀŝƐŽƌLJ ŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ͕ Ă
ǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉǁŝƚŚĂŐƌŽƵƉŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ͛ƐŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂŶĚ
ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚĂǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉŽĨŝƚLJŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ
ƐƚĂī͘ dŚĞ ŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚ ĂŶĚ ĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ ƉůĂŶ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟnjĞĚ
ĐŽŶǀĞƌƐĂƟŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐǁŚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝƌĞĐƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ
to the residents of Renton (such as the Community In
Schools Family Liaisons) as well as clients of Renton’s
ƐŽĐŝĂů ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐ ;ƐƵĐŚ ĂƐ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐͿ͘DĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞƐĞŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐ
ǁĞƌĞĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟǀĞƐŽĨƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ
ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐŝŶ
the Sunset Area.
SUNSET AREA NEEDS
ASSESSMENT
This needs assessment will help the City and the Renton
Housing Authority mobilize resources to respond to the
Sunset Area’s community needs, including applying for a
,hŚŽŝĐĞEĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ/ŶŝƟĂƟǀĞŐƌĂŶƚƚŽĂĐĐĞůĞƌĂƚĞ
ƚŚĞ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ^ƵŶƐĞƚ ƌĞĂ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ
ZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƟŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵ͘
WƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚďĞůŽǁĂƌĞƚŚĞĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ
in the citywide Community Needs Assessment, with
discussion of the context and relevance of each need
ǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ͘&ŽƌŵŽƌĞĚĞƚĂŝůŽŶƚŚĞĚĞĮŶŝƟŽŶ
of each need, please see the complete Community
Needs Assessment and associated appendices.
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
dŚĞƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŽĨƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂŝƐƐŝŵŝůĂƌ
ƚŽ ZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ ƐƵŐŐĞƐƟŶŐ Ă ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ƉŽƌƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ
ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌLJĞĂƌŶŝŶŐLJĞĂƌƐŽĨůŝĨĞ;ƌŽƵŐŚůLJ
25 years old through 60 years old). However, the
average household income of Sunset Area households
ůĂŐƐ ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚůLJ ďĞŚŝŶĚ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ĂŶĚ <ŝŶŐ ŽƵŶƚLJ͕
ŝŶĚŝĐĂƟŶŐ ŶĞĞĚ ĨŽƌ ŐƌĞĂƚĞƌ ĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJ ĨŽƌ
the Sunset Area’s households and individuals. Exhibits
1, 2 and 3͕ƌĞƐƉĞĐƟǀĞůLJ͕ŽŶƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƉĂŐĞƐ͕ƐŚŽǁ
ĂŐĞĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƟŽŶ͕ŵĞĚŝĂŶŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚŝŶĐŽŵĞ͕ĂŶĚŝŶĐŽŵĞ
ƐĞŐŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ͘/ƚŝƐǁŽƌƚŚŶŽƟŶŐƚŚĂƚ
Renton’s median household income is 19% below the
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJŵĞĚŝĂŶŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚŝŶĐŽŵĞ͘dŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ
has a lower median household income, 43% lower than
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ͘
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 18 of 85
3Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
Sunset Area Addendum
June 2014
Support for adults who face barriers to employment.
Support for adults who face barriers to employment
ŝƐĂĐƌŝƟĐĂůŶĞĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ͘hŶĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ
ƌĂƚĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚƚƌĂĐŬĞĚĂƚƚŚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚůĞǀĞů͕ƚŚŽƵŐŚ
ĞƐƟŵĂƚĞƐ ĚĞƌŝǀĞĚ ĨƌŽŵ ĞŶƐƵƐ dƌĂĐƚƐ ƐƵŐŐĞƐƚ ŚŝŐŚĞƌ
unemployment rates in the Sunset Area than both Renton
ĂŶĚ <ŝŶŐ ŽƵŶƚLJ͘ ĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůůLJ͕ ^ƵŶƐĞƚ ƌĞĂ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ
ŚĂǀĞŵĂŶLJŽĨƚŚĞĚĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƟĐƐŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ
ǁŝƚŚ ŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐ ƚŽ ĞŵƉůŽLJŵĞŶƚ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ Ă ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ
ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ ŽĨ ŝŵŵŝŐƌĂŶƚƐ͕ ŶŽŶͲ ŶŐůŝƐŚ ƐƉĞĂŬĞƌƐ͕ ĂŶĚ
ƉĞƌƐŽŶƐ ǁŝƚŚ ůŽǁ ĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĂů ĂƩĂŝŶŵĞŶƚ͘ :Žď ƐĞĂƌĐŚ
ĂŶĚĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŚĞůƉĮůůŝŶŐŽƵƚŽŶůŝŶĞ
ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕ĐŽŵƉŝůŝŶŐǁŽƌŬŚŝƐƚŽƌLJŽƌƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚ
ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƟŶŐĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶĐĂŶŚĞůƉŵŝƟŐĂƚĞƚŚĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐ
these individuals face.
Access to living-wage jobs and career advancement.
dŚĞ ^ƵŶƐĞƚ ƌĞĂ ŚĂƐ Ă ůĂďŽƌ ĨŽƌĐĞ ƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƟŽŶ ƌĂƚĞ
ƐŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽZĞŶƚŽŶĂŶĚ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ͕LJĞƚŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚŝŶĐŽŵĞ
ůĂŐƐƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚůLJ͘/ŵƉƌŽǀĞĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ
living wage jobs and career advancement are necessary
to ensure families have enough resources to meet basic
needs. As the neighborhood pursues redevelopment
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ͕ƉŽůŝĐLJŵĂŬĞƌƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐŵƵƐƚ
ĞŶĚĞĂǀŽƌƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐĨŽƌĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ
ƚŽďĞǀŝĂďůĞĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂŶƚƐŝŶƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŽĨƚŚĞ
neighborhood.
BASIC NEEDS FOR FAMILIES
The Community Needs Assessment for Human Services
ĂŶĚ ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ Ă ƐƵďͲƐĞĐƟŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ZĞŶƚŽŶ
ƉŽƉƵůĂƟŽŶ ƚŚĂƚ ƐƚƌƵŐŐůĞ ƚŽ ŵĞĞƚ ƚŚĞŝƌ ďĂƐŝĐ ŶĞĞĚƐ͘
,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ ŵŽƐƚ ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚůLJ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ
income, reveal the degree to which households have
resources to meet their basic needs. The Sunset Area
ŚĂƐ Ă ůĂƌŐĞƌ ƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶ ŽĨ ŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ ǁŝƚŚ ŝŶĐŽŵĞƐ
ƵŶĚĞƌΨϰϵ͕ϵϬϬƚŚĂŶďŽƚŚZĞŶƚŽŶĂŶĚ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ;ĂƐ
shown in Exhibit 3 on the following page), with 22% of
all Sunset Area households having annual incomes of less
ƚŚĂŶΨϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ ǀĞŶĨŽƌϭͲƉĞƌƐŽŶŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐ͕ŵĞĞƟŶŐĂůů
basic needs on an annual household income of less than
Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬǁŝůůďĞĚŝĸĐƵůƚ͘
Improved access to quality food.
^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐƌĞƉŽƌƚĂƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚĂŶĚŐƌŽǁŝŶŐŶĞĞĚ
for improved access to quality food in the Sunset Area,
ƉĂƌƟĐƵůĂƌůLJĂŵŽŶŐĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶ͘dŚĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐ
ŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐLJƐƚĞŵŽĨŶƵƚƌŝƟŽŶĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ
ĂƌĞĂůƐŽĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƚŽƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ͕ƉĂƌƟĐƵůĂƌůLJ
ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐ͘tŚŝůĞdŚĞ^ĂůǀĂƟŽŶƌŵLJ
ZĞŶƚŽŶZŽƚĂƌLJ&ŽŽĚĂŶŬŝƐƵŶĚĞƌŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐĚĞŵĂŶĚ͕
ƚŚĞůŽĐĂƟŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĨŽŽĚďĂŶŬĂŶĚƚŚĞĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĨƌŽŵ
the Sunset Area means many Sunset Area families in
ŶĞĞĚŽĨĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJŶƵƚƌŝƟŽŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĨĂĐĞŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐƚŽ
accessing food.
Day and night shelters for families that offer a range
of services.
ĞŝŶŐ Ă ƌĞůĂƟǀĞůLJ ƐŵĂůů ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͕ ŝƚ ŝƐ ĚŝĸĐƵůƚ ƚŽ
demonstrate the degree to which homelessness is
Ă ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ƉƌŽďůĞŵ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ^ƵŶƐĞƚ ƌĞĂ͘ ,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕
anecdotal reports from educators and service providers
suggest a problem of many families “bouncing around”
and “cramming in” to the smaller housing units in the
ϭϱϬ ϭϬϬ ϱϬ Ϭ ϱϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϱϬ
hŶĚĞƌϱLJĞĂƌƐ
ϱƚŽϵLJĞĂƌƐ
ϭϬƚŽϭϰLJĞĂƌƐ
ϭϱƚŽϭϵLJĞĂƌƐ
ϮϬƚŽϮϰLJĞĂƌƐ
ϮϱƚŽϮϵLJĞĂƌƐ
ϯϬƚŽϯϰLJĞĂƌƐ
ϯϱƚŽϯϵLJĞĂƌƐ
ϰϬƚŽϰϰLJĞĂƌƐ
ϰϱƚŽϰϵLJĞĂƌƐ
ϱϬƚŽϱϰLJĞĂƌƐ
ϱϱƚŽϱϵLJĞĂƌƐ
ϲϬƚŽϲϰLJĞĂƌƐ
ϲϱƚŽϲϵLJĞĂƌƐ
ϳϬƚŽϳϰLJĞĂƌƐ
ϳϱƚŽϳϵLJĞĂƌƐ
ϴϬƚŽϴϰLJĞĂƌƐ
ϴϱLJĞĂƌƐĂŶĚŽǀĞƌ
WŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
DĂůĞƐ &ĞŵĂůĞƐ
Exhibit 2
Median Household Income, 2012
Ψϲϴ͕ϳϳϱ
Ψϱϱ͕ϵϱϬ
Ψϯϵ͕ϯϭϴ
ΨͲ
ΨϭϬ͕ϬϬϬ
ΨϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ
ΨϯϬ͕ϬϬϬ
ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ
ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬ
ΨϲϬ͕ϬϬϬ
ΨϳϬ͕ϬϬϬ
ΨϴϬ͕ϬϬϬ
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJΎ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ
Source: U.S. Census, 2010; Sunset Area figures estimated by Census Tract, BERK,
2013.
Source: King County estimate based on most recent ACS 1-year estimate;
Renton and Sunset estimate based on Esri estimates for 2012
Exhibit 1
Sunset Area Age Distribution, 2010
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 19 of 85
4 City of Renton | Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
Sunset Area Addendum
area. Exhibit 4 shows the number and percentage of
ŽǀĞƌĐƌŽǁĚĞĚĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƐŝŶ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ͕ZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞ
Sunset Area Tracts. Future community assessments and
ĚĂƚĂĐŽůůĞĐƟŽŶƐŚŽƵůĚŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ
ŝŶƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJǁŚŽĂƌĞǁŝƚŚŽƵƚĂƵƐƵĂůŶŝŐŚƫŵĞ
residence and the services they need.
Increased services to help prevent
homelessneess to help families stay in their
homes.
Throughout the Community Needs Assessment,
ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐ͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟǀĞƐ
ĂŶĚĞĚƵĐĂƚŽƌƐƐƉŽŬĞŽĨƚŚĞĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ
ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƌŝƐŬŽĨůŽƐŝŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞůŽŶŐ
term consequences and costs endured by
ĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐǁŚŽůŽƐĞƚŚĞŝƌŚŽŵĞƐ͘/ƚŝƐĚŝĸĐƵůƚƚŽ
ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĂƚƌŝƐŬ
ŽĨůŽƐŝŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƉĞĐŝĮĐƚŽƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ͖
however, the higher rates of overcrowding, lower
incomes, and renters compared to Renton are
ĂůůƐƵŐŐĞƐƟǀĞŽĨŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƌĂƚĞƐŽĨĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐĂƚƌŝƐŬ
of losing housing. This need calls for support to
households to prevent loss of housing.
HEALTH & WELLNESS
dŚĞ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ EĞĞĚƐ ƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ƚĂŬĞƐ Ă
services-oriented approach to health and
ǁĞůůŶĞƐƐ ƚŽ ŝĚĞŶƟĨLJ ƚŚĞ ƐƉĞĐŝĮĐ ŚĞĂůƚŚ ƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ
ƉƌŝŽƌŝƟĞƐŝŶƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƌƐLJƐƚĞŵŽĨŚƵŵĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ
needs. A dominant theme throughout the
ƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬǁĂƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĂŶĚƉĞƌƐŽŶĂů
obstacles that many individuals and families
face to adequate health care. There are many Sunset
ƌĞĂƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚůĂĐŬĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŚĞĂůƚŚĐůŝŶŝĐƐ͕ĞŝƚŚĞƌ
due to an inability to pay for health services or mobility
challenges. The free and low-cost clinics that are available
ĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͕ŽƌŝŶŽƚŚĞƌũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƟŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚŵĂLJ
ďĞĚŝĸĐƵůƚƚŽĂĐĐĞƐƐĚƵĞƚŽƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŽƌŵŽďŝůŝƚLJ
constraints.
Better access to health and dental care for low-
income residents.
dŚĞŚŝŐŚƉƌŽƉŽƌƟŽŶŽĨŚŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐǁŝƚŚůŽǁŝŶĐŽŵĞŝŶ
the Sunset Area, along with the higher unemployment
ƌĂƚĞ͕ƐƵŐŐĞƐƚƐƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞůŝŬĞůLJŵĂŶLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚŽƵƚ
health insurance who face obstacles to accessing health
ĂŶĚĚĞŶƚĂůĐĂƌĞ͘ZĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟǀĞƐĨƌŽŵZĞŶƚŽŶ͛ƐƉƵďůŝĐ
schools and other service providers report that there
ĂƌĞ ŵĂŶLJ ĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶ ůĂĐŬŝŶŐ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ ĚĞŶƚĂů ĐĂƌĞ ĂŶĚ
ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĨŽƌ ǀŝƐŝŽŶ ƐĐƌĞĞŶŝŶŐƐ͕ ĐƌĞĂƟŶŐ ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ
hardship.
Early childhood screenings and parenting education.
Service providers noted a gap in the availability of these
services to low-income families with young children in
ZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĂůĂĐŬŽĨĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůLJƐĞŶƐŝƟǀĞ͕ďŝůŝŶŐƵĂů
Ks ZZKt/E'
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ ZĞŶƚŽŶ ^ƵŶƐĞƚdƌĂĐƚƐΎ
KĐĐƵƉĂŶƚƐƉĞƌƌŽŽŵ
Ϭ͘ϱϬŽƌůĞƐƐ ϱϲϳ͕ϰϯϯ Ϯϱ͕Ϯϭϭ ϰ͕ϭϳϵ
Ϭ͘ϱϭƚŽϭ͘ϬϬ ϮϬϮ͕ϵϭϳ ϵ͕ϱϭϰ ϭ͕Ϯϴϳ
ϭ͘ϬϭƚŽϭ͘ϱϬ ϭϯ͕ϲϱϭ ϭ͕Ϭϰϭ ϯϯϭ
ϭ͘ϱϭƚŽϮ͘ϬϬ ϱ͕ϭϭϴ ϭϴϵ ϯϬ
Ϯ͘ϬϭŽƌŵŽƌĞ ϵϱϭ ϳϬ Ϯϭ
EƵŵďĞƌŽĨKǀĞƌĐƌŽǁĚĞĚhŶŝƚƐ;хϭͿ ϭϵ͕ϳϮϬ ϭ͕ϯϬϬ ϯϴϮ
WĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨhŶŝƚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽǁĚĞĚ;хϭͿ ϰ͘ϳй ϱ͘ϳй ϭϬ͘ϭй
$PHULFDQ&RPPXQLW\6XUYH\<HDU(VWLPDWHV
Exhibit 4
Overcrowded Dwellings, 2011
Source: American Community Survey, 2007-2011 5-year average.
* The Sunset Tracts include Tracts 252 and 254, a much larger area than the Sunset
Area itself.
ϮϮй
ϭϭй
ϭϭй
ϭϲй
ϭϴй
ϴй
ϵй
ϯй
Ϯй
ϭϬй
ϵй
ϭϬй
ϭϱй
ϮϬй
ϭϯй
ϭϱй
ϱй
ϰй
ϵй
ϳй
ϴй
ϭϮй
ϭϳй
ϭϰй
ϭϴй
ϴй
ϴй
Ϭй ϱй ϭϬй ϭϱй ϮϬй Ϯϱй
hŶĚĞƌΨϭϱ͕ϬϬϬ
Ψϭϱ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϮϰ͕ϵϵϵ
ΨϮϱ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϯϰ͕ϵϵϵ
Ψϯϱ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϰϵ͕ϵϵϵ
ΨϱϬ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϳϰ͕ϵϵϵ
Ψϳϱ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϵϵ͕ϵϵϵ
ΨϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϭϰϵ͕ϵϵϵ
ΨϭϱϬ͕ϬϬϬͲΨϭϵϵ͕ϵϵϵ
DŽƌĞƚŚĂŶΨϮϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ <ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ
ZĞŶƚŽŶ
^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ
Exhibit 3
Household Income Segmentation, 2012
Source: King County estimate based on most recent ACS 1-year estimate; Renton and
Sunset estimate based on Esri estimates for 2012.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 20 of 85
5Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
Sunset Area Addendum
June 2014
ƉĂƌĞŶƟŶŐ ĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ ŽƉƟŽŶƐ͘ 'ŝǀĞŶ ƚŚĞ ^ƵŶƐĞƚ ƌĞĂ͛Ɛ
high percentage of low-income residents, immigrants,
ĂŶĚ ŶŽŶͲ ŶŐůŝƐŚ ƐƉĞĂŬĞƌƐ͕ ƚŚĞƌĞ ŝƐ ůŝŬĞůLJ ƚŽ ďĞ Ă
ƐƵďƐƚĂŶƟĂůŶĞĞĚŚĞƌĞ͘
More mental health and substance abuse services.
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŵĞŶƚĂůŚĞĂůƚŚŶĞĞĚƐĂƌĞĚŝĸĐƵůƚƚŽĞƐƟŵĂƚĞ
ĚƵĞƚŽĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨĚĂƚĂůŝŵŝƚĂƟŽŶƐĂŶĚƉŽŽƌŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
ĨŽƌŵĞŶƚĂůŚĞĂůƚŚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƟǀĞƐ
ĂŶĚƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐŝŶƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐ
ŝŶŵĂŶLJƐŽĐŝĂůƉƌŽďůĞŵƐŽŌĞŶůŝŶŬĞĚƚŽŵĞŶƚĂůŚĞĂůƚŚ
ŶĞĞĚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĚŽŵĞƐƟĐǀŝŽůĞŶĐĞ͕ĚƌƵŐƵƐĞ͕ĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚ
neglect.
AVAILABLE, QUALITY
HOUSING
ƚĂĮƌƐƚŐůĂŶĐĞ͕ƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂŚĂƐĂŶĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƐƵƉƉůLJ
ŽĨ͞ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕͟ŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐǁŝƚŚƌĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚ
ďĞĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƚŽƚŚŽƐĞĞĂƌŶŝŶŐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJ͛Ɛ
median household income. However, even with the
ůŽĐĂůƐƵƉƉůLJŽĨƌĞůĂƟǀĞůLJĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƚŽĐŬ͕ƚŚĞ
low incomes of many Sunset Area households means
ĂůůŵĂƌŬĞƚͲƌĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝƐŽƵƚŽĨƌĞĂĐŚ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕ƚŚĞ
ĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƚŽĐŬŝƐůĂƌŐĞůLJŽůĚĞƌǁŝƚŚƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ
ƉŽƌƟŽŶƐďƵŝůƚĂƐƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĨŽƌƚŚĞǁĂƌĚĞĨĞŶƐĞ
ŝŶĚƵƐƚƌLJŝŶƚŚĞϭϵϰϬƐ͘DƵĐŚŽĨƚŚŝƐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝƐƐƟůůŝŶƵƐĞ
ƚŽĚĂLJĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚŝŶŐĨƵŶĐƟŽŶĂůŽďƐŽůĞƐĐĞŶĐĞ͘
More rental units for those earning 30% of King
County median income or less.
'ŝǀĞŶƚŚĞƐƵƉƉůLJŽĨĂīŽƌĚĂďůĞƌĞŶƚĂůŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ĂƐǁĞůů
as presence of subsidized units provided through the
Renton Housing Authority and other service providers,
ƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƟŽŶƐĨŽƌƐŽŵĞŽĨ
ZĞŶƚŽŶ͛ƐůŽǁĞƐƚŝŶĐŽŵĞĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶƚŽƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ
ĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚŵĂŬĞŽƚŚĞƌĂƌĞĂƐŝŶZĞŶƚŽŶ
ŵŽƌĞ ĂƩĂŝŶĂďůĞ ƚŽ ƚŚŽƐĞ ĞĂƌŶŝŶŐ ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ ϯϬй ŽĨ
Area Median Income (AMI), the Sunset Area needs
ŶĞǁŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƟŽŶƐĨŽƌƚŚŽƐĞǁŝƚŚǀĞƌLJůŽǁŝŶĐŽŵĞƐ
including accessible units, larger units, and updated
ƵŶŝƚƐƚŚĂƚĐĂŶďĞƩĞƌĐŽŶƚƌŽůƵƟůŝƚLJĞdžƉĞŶƐĞƐ͘
More safe, efficient, and healthy housing for low and
medium income households.
^ĂĨĞ͕ ĞĸĐŝĞŶƚ ĂŶĚ ŚĞĂůƚŚLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ ŝƐ Ă ŶĞĞĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ
Sunset Area. Service providers note that the Sunset
ƌĞĂŚĂƐŽůĚĞƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐƚŽĐŬǁŝƚŚĂůŽƚŽĨĚŝůĂƉŝĚĂƚĞĚ
ƉƌŽƉĞƌƟĞƐ͘dŚĞƐĞŚŽŵĞƐŽŌĞŶŚĂǀĞŵŽůĚ͕ůĞĂĚƉĂŝŶƚ͕
ĂƐďĞƐƚŽƐ͕ĂŶĚͬŽƌďĂĚĞůĞĐƚƌŝĐĂůǁŝƌŝŶŐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŵĂŬĞƚŚĞŵ
ƵŶƐĂĨĞĂŶĚƉŽƚĞŶƟĂůůLJƵŶŝŶŚĂďŝƚĂďůĞ͘Exhibit 5 shows
ƚŚĞĂŐĞŽĨĞdžŝƐƟŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐŝŶϮϬϭϯ͘^ƵŶƐĞƚdĞƌƌĂĐĞ͕
a 100 unit family public housing complex in the center of
ƚŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ͕ŝƐŝŶŶĞĞĚŽĨƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚƌĞŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƚŽ
meet current building codes and a redesign to improve
community livability.
Exhibit 5
Age of Existing Housing Units in Renton, 2013
Source: King County Assessor’s Office; BERK 2013
ϯϯϱ
ϭϮ
Ϯϱ
Ϯ
ϯϮ
Ͳ
ϭϳ
ϭϭϬ
ϰ
ϵ
ϭϮϬ
ϯϲϱ
ϵϭ
Ϯϯ
ϭϭϰ
Ϯϰϳ
ϲ
Ͳ ϱϬ ϭϬϬ ϭϱϬ ϮϬϬ ϮϱϬ ϯϬϬ ϯϱϬ ϰϬϬ ϰϱϬ
ϭϵϰϬͲϭϵϰϵ
ϭϵϱϬͲϭϵϱϵ
ϭϵϲϬͲϭϵϲϵ
ϭϵϳϬͲϭϵϳϵ
ϭϵϴϬͲϭϵϴϵ
ϭϵϵϬͲϭϵϵϵ
ϮϬϬϬͲϮϬϬϵ
ϮϬϭϬΘ>ĂƚĞƌ
^ŝŶŐůĞ&ĂŵŝůLJ ŽŶĚŽƐ ƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 21 of 85
6 City of Renton | Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
Sunset Area Addendum
NEIGHBORHOOD
OPPORTUNITY
EĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƌĞŇĞĐƚƐĂƉĞƌƐŽŶŽƌĨĂŵŝůLJ͛Ɛ
ĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŚĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐƚŚĞLJŶĞĞĚ
to lead socially and economically successful lives. In
ĂůŵŽƐƚĂůůĐŝƟĞƐ͕ĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐĂƌĞ
ĚƌŝǀĞŶďLJƚŚĞĂƩĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƟŽŶƐŝŶĚŝīĞƌĞŶƚ
neighborhoods, and as a result are geographically
unequally distributed.
dŚĞ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂŚĂƐďĞĞŶŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ͕
ĂŶĚ ŝƚƐ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ͕ ĂƐ ĂŶ ĂƌĞĂ ŽĨ ƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů͘
dŚŝƐŝƐŝŶƉĂƌƚĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞĂŶĐŚŽƌƉƵďůŝĐŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƟŽŶƐ
ĂŶĚ ĨĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂů ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĂƌĞĂ
ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐ ƚŚĞ ŵĂƌŬĞƚ ƉŽƚĞŶƟĂů ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚ ǁŝƚŚ ŝƚƐ
ĐĞŶƚƌĂůůŽĐĂƟŽŶ͕ĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŽƉƟŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚ
ƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂŵĞŶŝƟĞƐ͘dŚĞŶĞĞĚƐĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŝĚĞŶƟĮĞĚ
priority human service and housing needs that, together
ǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƟŽŶĂůŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ͕ǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ
opportunity for Sunset Area community members
ƚŽ ƉĂƌƟĐŝƉĂƚĞ ŝŶ ĂŶĚ ďĞŶĞĮƚ ĨƌŽŵ ĨƵƚƵƌĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ
redevelopment.
Improved mobility and transportation options.
dŚĞ ^ƵŶƐĞƚ ƌĞĂ ŚĂƐ ƌĞůĂƟǀĞůLJ ĞĂƐLJ ďƵƐ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ƚŽ
ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ďƵƚůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŽƉƟŽŶƐƚŽĂĐĐĞƐƐ
other parts of the City. Service providers report many
ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶͲƌĞůĂƚĞĚŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐďŽƚŚĂĐĐĞƐƐ
ĂŶĚĐŽƐƚ͘dŚĞƌĞĐĞŶƚĚĞĐůŝŶĞŝŶƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨďƵƐƟĐŬĞƚƐŽƌ
bus vouchers towards a card-based system of payment
has limited the ability for service providers to support
ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƟŽŶŶĞĞĚƐĨŽƌƐƉĞĐŝĮĐƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƟŽŶ͕
the Sunset Area has poor pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure. The City has made some investments in
ŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƌŽƵƚĞƐ͕ďƵƚƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞƐƟůůƐŝŐŶŝĮĐĂŶƚ
ŐĂƉƐŝŶďŝŬĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶůŝŶŬƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů
areas and service nodes.
More high quality out-of-school time opportunities
for youth.
^ŝŵŝůĂƌ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ƌĞƐƚ ŽĨ ZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ ƚŚĞ ^ƵŶƐĞƚ ƌĞĂ ůĂĐŬƐ
ƐƵĸĐŝĞŶƚ ŽƵƚͲŽĨͲƐĐŚŽŽů ƟŵĞ ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ ĨŽƌ LJŽƵƚŚ͘
Since the area has an especially high percentage of low-
ŝŶĐŽŵĞĨĂŵŝůŝĞƐ͕ŝƚŝƐůŝŬĞůLJƚŚĂƚĚĞŵĂŶĚŝƐŚŝŐŚĨŽƌůŽǁͲ
ŽƌŶŽͲĐŽƐƚĂĐƟǀŝƟĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝǀĞƚŽƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨ
community youth.
Increased access to affordable, quality early
childhood education.
dŚĞƌĞŝƐĂĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞƐŚŽƌƚĂŐĞŽĨƋƵĂůŝƚLJĞĂƌůLJĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶ
ĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐŝŶZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ǁŚŝĐŚĂīĞĐƚƐƚŚĞ
^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂĂƐǁĞůů͘tŚŝůĞƚŚĞŶĞǁDĞĂĚŽǁƌĞƐƚ ĂƌůLJ
>ĞĂƌŶŝŶŐĞŶƚĞƌƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƋƵĂůŝƚLJĞĂƌůLJĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ
to the Sunset Area, the need far outstrips the available
slots. The high percentage of low-income and immigrant
families in the neighborhood suggests a need for low-
ĐŽƐƚ͕ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůLJĂĚĂƉƟǀĞĞĂƌůLJĞĚƵĐĂƟŽŶŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƟĞƐ
that can accommodate a wide variety of family needs.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 22 of 85
7Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing | City of Renton
Sunset Area Addendum
June 2014
CONSULTING TEAM
Dawn Couch, Project Manager
Lisa Grueter, AICP, Housing Policy Expert
Gary Simonson, Lead Analyst
Annie Saurwein, Analyst
“Helping Communities and Organizations
Create Their Best Futures”
2025 First Avenue, Suite 800
SeaƩle, Washington ϵ8121
P (206) 324-8760
www.berkconsulƟng.com
PROJECT TEAM - CITY OF RENTON & PARTNERS
Adriana Abramovich, GIS Analyst, Community &
Economic Development
Karen Bergsvik, Human Services Manager, Community
Services
Lisa Fabatz, Resident Services Coordinator, Renton
Housing Authority
Mark Gropper, ExecuƟve Director, Renton Housing
Authority
Terry Higashiyama, Administrator, Community
Services
Miryam Laytner, Director of Development &
Advancement, Neighborhood House
Shannon Matson, Vice-Chair, Renton Human Services
Advisory CommiƩee
Kaelene Nobis, Resident Outreach Coordinator,
Renton Housing Authority
Mark Santos-Johnson, Community Development
Project Manager, Community & Economic
Development
Linda Smith, Chair, Renton Human Services Advisory
CommiƩee
Kris Sorensen, Associate Planner, Community &
Economic Development
Chip Vincent, Administrator, Community & Economic
Development
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 23 of 85
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 24 of 85
June 2014 1
City of Renton
Community Needs Assessment for Human Services and Housing
APPENDIX A
BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT
The City of Renton is conducting a Community Needs Assessment for housing and human services to inform
its Comprehensive Plan that must be updated by 2015. As an interim step of the Community Needs
Assessment, the project team conducted a review and analysis of available quantitative data on the current
social, economic, neighborhood, health, and housing conditions in Renton. The Baseline Community
Conditions document describes a range of current conditions within the City of Renton and the Sunset Area, a
small neighborhood located East of I-405 in the northern part of Renton.
This document relies primarily on quantitative, secondary information and serves as a discussion resource to
help build a common understanding of conditions within the City, as well as to identify gaps in services and
potential indicators to track progress toward the desired future. The Community Needs Assessment is based
on the quantitative data presented here, additional information on current social and housing services, and a
qualitative assessment based on community feedback and input. This input – received through interviews,
focus groups, stakeholder reviews, and other facilitated conversations about community needs and desires –
will provide context and other information to support policy discussions. There are several key topics that are
not included in this document, including crime, mental health, drug addiction, youth-related services, and
others. However, most of these topics are addressed to some extent through the qualitative community
outreach effort.
The conditions report draws on publically available data from the following sources:
U.S. Census Bureau
x Decennial Census
x American Community Survey (5-year
estimates)
x Esri projections based on Decennial Census
data
Federal Agencies
x U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development
x U.S. Office of Refugees
Washington State Agencies
x Washington State Office of Financial
Management
x The Office of Superintendent of Public
Instruction
County and Regional Agencies
x King County Assessor’s Office
x Puget Sound Regional Council
x Public Health of Seattle/King County
x Seattle/King County Coalition on
Homelessness
Other
x Dupre and Scott
x Zillow.com
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 25 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
About this document................................................................................................................................ 1
Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 2
POPULATION & COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................... 4
Renton Population & Community Characteristics ............................................................................................ 4
Exhibit 1 City of Renton Population, 2010-2013 ......................................................................................................................................... 4
Exhibit 2 Sunset Area Population, 2010-2012............................................................................................................................................. 4
Exhibit 3 Age Distribution, 2010 ................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Exhibit 4 Renton and King County Broad Age Category Distributions, 2010 ............................................................................................... 5
Exhibit 5 Household Size in King County, Renton, and the Sunset Area ..................................................................................................... 6
Exhibit 6 Racial Composition, 2012............................................................................................................................................................. 7
Exhibit 7 Languages Spoken at Home in Renton, 2005-2009 5-year Average ............................................................................................. 7
Exhibit 8 Top Ten Countries of Origin for Refugee Arrivals to Washington State, Fiscal Year 2012 ............................................................ 8
Exhibit 9 Renton’s Estimated Adult Population Living with a Disability, 2012 ............................................................................................ 9
HOUSEHOLD ECONOMICS ....................................................................................................................... 10
Household Income.................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
Exhibit 10 Median Household Income, 2012 Estimate* ........................................................................................................................... 10
Exhibit 11 Household Income Segmentation, 2011 & 2012...................................................................................................................... 11
Exhibit 12 Percent of Families with Food Stamp/ Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefits, 2011 ....................................... 12
Income by Household Size ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12
Exhibit 13 Median Household Income by Size, 2011 ................................................................................................................................ 13
Homeless Population ...................................................................................................................................... 13
Exhibit 14 Unsheltered Homeless Counts, 2010 – 2013 ........................................................................................................................... 14
Exhibit 15 Homeless Students in Renton and Washington State, 2011 – 2012 School Year ..................................................................... 14
Employment & Labor Force Participation ....................................................................................................... 15
Exhibit 16 Labor Force Participation and Unemployment Rate for Civilians 16+ Years Old, 2007 – 2011 5-Year Average ....................... 15
Housing Cost Burden ....................................................................................................................................... 15
Exhibit 17 Percent of Renton Households Spending More than 30% of Income on Housing, 2007-2011 5-year Average* ...................... 16
NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITY ............................................................................................................. 17
Economic Health ............................................................................................................................................. 17
Exhibit 18 Map of Economic Health Index by Tract in Renton, 2012 ........................................................................................................ 18
Transportation/Mobility ................................................................................................................................. 19
Exhibit 19 Map of Mobility/Transportation Index by Tract in Renton, 2012 ............................................................................................ 20
Means of Transportation and Travel Time to Work........................................................................................ 21
Exhibit 20 Means of Transportation to Work, 2011-2013 3-year Average ............................................................................................... 21
Exhibit 21 Travel Time to Work, 2011 – 2013 3-year Average .................................................................................................................. 21
Education Opportunity.................................................................................................................................... 22
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 26 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 3
Exhibit 22 Percent of Renton School District Students Meeting Grade Level Reading and Math Standards, School Year 2012-13 .......... 22
Exhibit 23 Percent of Sunset Area School Students Meeting Grade Level Reading Standard, School Year 2012-13 ................................ 23
Exhibit 24 Renton High Schools’ Graduation Rates, School Year 2010-11 ................................................................................................ 24
Exhibit 25 Racial Comparison of Renton High School Students’ Graduation Rates, School Year 2011-12 ................................................ 24
HEALTH & CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................... 25
Exhibit 26 Five-Year Total Deaths per 100,000 of Top Five Causes of Death, 2007-2011 ......................................................................... 25
Exhibit 27 Five-Year Percent of Adults 18+ with Negative Health Risk Factors and Chronic Disease, 2006-2010 ..................................... 26
Exhibit 28 Five-Year Percent of Adults with Inadequate Access to Care Indicators, 2006-2010 ............................................................... 27
HOUSING INVENTORY & AFFORDABILITY ................................................................................................ 28
Exhibit 29 Overview Map of Renton, the Sunset Area, and the Potential Annexation Areas ................................................................... 29
Housing Units .................................................................................................................................................. 29
Exhibit 30 Estimate of Housing Units, 2013 .............................................................................................................................................. 30
Exhibit 31 Number of Housing Units, 2013 ............................................................................................................................................... 31
Exhibit 32 Existing Renton Housing Units by Year Built, 2013 .................................................................................................................. 32
Housing Attainability ....................................................................................................................................... 33
Affordability .................................................................................................................................................... 33
Exhibit 33 Housing Need Income Thresholds Based on Area Median Income .......................................................................................... 33
Estimating Households by Percent of Median Income ............................................................................................................................. 33
Exhibit 34 Household Estimates by Percentage Median Income, 2011 dollars ........................................................................................ 34
Affordability of Renter Occupied Housing .................................................................................................. 34
Exhibit 35 Renter Households by Housing Need Category, 2011 .............................................................................................................. 35
Exhibit 36 Renton Rental Unit Gap Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 36
Exhibit 37 Renton Housing Authority Subsidized Rental Units, 2013........................................................................................................ 37
Exhibit 38 King County Renting Households by Household Size and Income, 2010 .................................................................................. 38
Apartment Rents and Vacancy Rates .............................................................................................................. 38
Exhibit 39 Average Apartment Rents and Vacancy Rates in Renton, 2005-2012 ...................................................................................... 39
Exhibit 40 Comparison of Fair Market Rents and Current Market Prices ................................................................................................. 40
Exhibit 41 Renton Gross Rent by Bedroom ............................................................................................................................................... 40
Overcrowding .............................................................................................................................................. 41
Exhibit 42 Percentage of Rental Units that are Overcrowded, 2007-2011 5-year Average ...................................................................... 41
Owner Occupied Housing ............................................................................................................................... 41
Exhibit 43 Owner Tenure Household by Housing Need Category, 2012 ................................................................................................... 41
Exhibit 44 King County Owning Households by Household Size and Income, 2010 .................................................................................. 42
Exhibit 45 Renton Median Sales Prices, Jan 2005 – 2013 ......................................................................................................................... 43
Exhibit 46 Annual Income Needed to Purchase a Home at Current Median Selling Price, 2013 .............................................................. 44
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 27 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 4
POPULATION & COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS
A broad overview of Renton and the Sunset Area’s population provides a basic understanding of who the City
serves and what the scale of need may be. This section looks at several important community characteristics
including population, age distribution, household size, racial and ethnic composition, and languages spoken
at home.
Renton Population & Community Characteristics
Exhibit 1
City of Renton Population, 2010-2013
Source: OFM Forecasting Division, 2013.
x As of 2013, about 95,540 residents live in the City of Renton.
x Renton’s population is growing faster than King County. Renton’s compound annual growth rate of 1.2%
is twice as high as the County’s overall compound growth rate of 0.6%.
Exhibit 2
Sunset Area Population, 2010-2012
Source: Esri, 2012.
x In 2012, there were an estimated 2,780 residents in the Sunset Area.
x Based on past trends, the population of the Sunset Area could increase to 3,002 by 2017, an increase of
about 220 people. This is a compound annual growth rate of about 1.5% over the next five years.
Additional investment in the Sunset Area could increase this rate of growth.
Compound Annual
Growth Rate 1.2%
Compound Annual
Growth Rate 1.5%
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 28 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 5
Exhibit 3 presents the population age structure for Renton and the Sunset Area based on the 2010 Census,
the last universal assessment of population structure. In 2010, the Sunset Area’s population under 18 years
old (not shown in chart) was 674 (or 26.2% of the total population) and the senior population (ages 65 years
and over) was 280 (or 10.9% of the total population). In the Sunset Area, 67% of adults over 54 years old are
female, compared to the 33% that are male.
Exhibit 3
Age Distribution, 2010
Source: U.S. Census, 2010; Sunset Area figures estimated by Census Blocks, BERK 2013.
x In 2010, Renton’s population under 18 years old (not shown in chart) was 21,117 (or 23.2% of the total
population) and the senior population (ages 65 years and over) was 9,164 (or 10.1% of the population).
x In 2010, the Sunset Area’s population under 18 years old (not shown in chart) was 674 (or 26.2% of the
total population) and the senior population (ages 65 years and over) was 280 (or 10.9% of the total
population).
Exhibit 4 compares Renton to the County average using broader age categories.
x In the Sunset Area, 67% of adults over 54 years old are female, compared to the 33% that are male.
Exhibit 4
Renton and King County Broad Age Category Distributions, 2010
Source: U.S. Census, 2010.
x Renton’s population is slightly younger than the County average, with a higher percentage of residents
under 20 years old and a lower percentage of residents between 20 – 64 years old and over 65 years old.
However, the difference is not substantial.
3,601
2,946
2,704
2,535
2,938
4,083
3,926
3,799
3,624
3,355
3,105
2,517
2,002
1,324
946
665
481
287
154
3,496
2,842
2,536
2,390
3,085
4,040
3,983
3,725
3,327
3,158
3,102
2,679
2,265
1,577
1,130
887
761
573
379
5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Under 5 years
5 to 9 years
10 to 14 years
15 to 19 years
20 to 24 years
25 to 29 years
30 to 34 years
35 to 39 years
40 to 44 years
45 to 49 years
50 to 54 years
55 to 59 years
60 to 64 years
65 to 69 years
70 to 74 years
75 to 79 years
80 to 84 years
85 to 89 years
90 years and over
Population
Renton Age Distribution, 2010
Males
44,992
Females
45,935
105
82
77
91
101
112
106
102
83
85
75
72
64
49
44
32
35
25
107
92
93
76
81
106
119
98
97
86
75
52
42
25
31
13
16
10
150 100 50 0 50 100 150
Under 5 years
5 to 9 years
10 to 14 years
15 to 19 years
20 to 24 years
25 to 29 years
30 to 34 years
35 to 39 years
40 to 44 years
45 to 49 years
50 to 54 years
55 to 59 years
60 to 64 years
65 to 69 years
70 to 74 years
75 to 79 years
80 to 84 years
85 years and over
Population
Sunset Area Age Distribution, 2010
Males
1,219
Females
1,340
Under 20
Years
20-64
Years
65 Years and
Over
King County 23.9% 65.2% 10.9%
Renton 25.4% 64.6% 10.1%
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 29 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 6
Exhibit 5
Household Size in King County, Renton, and the Sunset Area
Source: U.S. Census, 2010; Esri, 2012. Figures may exceed total due to rounding.
x The Sunset Area has a notably higher percentage of 1-person households than Renton overall, but a
lower percentage of 2-4 person households. The Sunset Area also has a slightly higher percentage of 7+
person households than Renton in general.
x Renton has a slightly greater proportion of households with 3 to 7 people. About 40% of Renton
residents live in households with more than 2 people, compared to 36% for the County overall.
x Renton has a slightly higher percentage of households with 3-4 persons per household (29%) than the
County overall (28%), as well as a higher percentage of households with 5-7 people (10%) than the
County overall (8%).
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 30 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 7
Exhibit 6
Racial Composition, 2012
Source: U.S. Census, 2010; Esri, 2012.
*King County figure based on 2010 U.S. Census, Renton and Sunset Area based on 2012 estimates from the American
Community Survey
x Renton is somewhat more diverse than the County overall, with 37% of its population being races other
than white compared to 31% for the County.
x Renton’s Hispanic population is 10%, compared to 9% for the County overall (not shown).
x Renton’s foreign born population is 26.4%, compared to 20.0% for the County overall (not shown).
x The Sunset Area’s Hispanic Population is 24.8%, compared to 10.1% for Renton (not shown).
x The Sunset Area is substantially more diverse than Renton overall, with a much higher Hispanic
population, a slightly higher Black population, and a much higher “Some Other Race” population. Renton
has a slightly higher Asian population than the Sunset Area.
Exhibit 7
Languages Spoken at Home in Renton, 2005-2009 5-year Average
Source: U.S. Census, 2010; Esri, 2012.
x Approximately 32% of Renton residents do not speak English at home, with Asian & Pacific Languages
and Spanish being the most commonly spoken languages besides English.
Persons
Age 5+ years
% of
Total
Without
English
Proficiency
% of Group
Without English
Proficiency
English 52,331 68% --
Asian and Pacific Languages 10,758 14% 2,385 22%
Spanish 6,671 9% 235 4%
Other Indo-European Languages 4,703 6% 959 20%
Other Languages 2,130 3% 245 12%
Total 76,593 100% 3,824 5%
Language Spoken at Home
68%14%
9%
6%3%
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 31 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 8
x Although 32% of Renton residents do not speak English at home, only 7.4% of the total population does
not have proficiency in English (not shown). Residents were considered not proficient in English if they
selected the “Speaks English ‘Not Well’” or “Speaks English ‘Not at All’” when asked to describe their own
proficiency in English in the American Community Survey.
x In 2012, the Renton School District had 6,985 students (49% of all students) who were considered
Transitional Bilingual, or who qualified for English Language Development services.
x Renton School District tracks the home language of all students. For the current school year (2013 –
2014), the top 10 languages other than English spoken in descending order were:
1. Spanish
2. Vietnamese
3. Somali
4. Chinese – Cantonese
5. Russian
6. Tagalog
7. Ukrainian
8. Cambodian
9. Punjabi
10. Rumanian
There are more than 80 languages represented in the Renton School District on any given day, but most
students who do not speak English at home speak one of the top five languages.
It is difficult to predict what languages future immigrants to Renton will speak. One indicator is the country of
origin for refugee arrivals to Washington State, presented in Exhibit 8. On average, refugees have less English
proficiency and greater social service needs than other types of immigrants. While not all refugee
populations will move into Renton, they provide insight into what families may be linguistically isolated in the
future.
Exhibit 8
Top Ten Countries of Origin for Refugee Arrivals to Washington State, Fiscal Year 2012
Source: U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement, 2013.
x Almost 90% of refugees that came to Washington State in 2012 came from one of these top ten
countries of origin.
The rate of individuals living with a disability is an indicator of human service needs. Exhibit 9 presents the
rate of self-reported disabilities among the adult population.
Country of Origin Number of Arrivals
Burma/Myanmar 481
Bhutan 424
Iraq 297
Somalia 215
Ukraine 116
Iran 107
Moldova 105
Eritrea 73
Russia 64
Democrative Republic of Congo 55
Other countries 228
Total Refugee Arrivals in Washington 2,165
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 32 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 9
Exhibit 9
Renton’s Estimated Adult Population Living with a Disability, 2012
Source: American Community Survey, 2008 – 2012 5-year estimates.
x For the population 18 to 64 years, the proportion of the population with a specific type of disability is
relatively similar across all disability types. For older adults, ambulatory difficulties are much more
prevalent, as well as all other disability types except for vision difficulties.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 33 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 10
HOUSEHOLD ECONOMICS
Examining a community’s household economic conditions provides insight into the resources available to
individuals and families to meet their basic needs. More importantly, it helps us estimate what portion of the
population does not have the resources necessary to meet basic needs, as well as where assistance may be
most beneficial.
Household Income
Exhibit 10 compares median household income for King County, Renton, and the Sunset Area and Exhibit 11
shows the segmentation of household income for each of the three areas. The data reflect income for all
households regardless of size. Exhibit 12 shows the percentage of families receiving Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) (i.e. food stamp) benefits.
Exhibit 10
Median Household Income, 2012 Estimate*
Source: King County estimate based on most recent ACS 1 year estimate; Renton and Sunset estimate based on ESRI
estimates for 2012.
x Renton’s median household income is lower than the County‘s, and the Sunset Area’s median household
income of $39,318 is lower than both Renton’s and the County’s median household income.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 34 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 11
Exhibit 11
Household Income Segmentation, 2011 & 2012
Source: King County estimates from American Community Survey, 2007-2011 5-year average; Renton and Sunset Area estimates
from ESRI 2012. Figures may exceed total due to rounding.
x Renton has a smaller proportion of households in the higher income categories than the County overall,
with 44% of households earning less than $50,000 per year (compared to 35% for the County) and 24%
earning more than $100,000 (compared to 34% for the County overall).
x The Sunset Area has a greater proportion of households with incomes below $25,000 than Renton and
the County overall. Fourteen percent (14%) of Sunset Area households earn more than $100,000.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 35 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 12
Exhibit 12
Percent of Families with Food Stamp/
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefits, 2011
Source: American Community Survey, 2007-2011 5-year estimates; BERK, 2013.
* The Sunset Tracts include all of Tracts 252 and 254, which the Sunset Area is within. However, the Sunset Tracts represent a much
larger area than the Sunset Area itself.
x While Renton has a moderately higher percentage of residents receiving Food Stamp/SNAP benefits
(11%) compared to the County overall (8%), the weighted average of the Sunset Tracts (13%) are higher
than both King County and Renton.
x More than half (54.6%) of Renton School District Students are eligible for Free or Reduced Meals. This is
almost 10 percentage points higher than the Washington State average (46.1%).
Income by Household Size
Household incomes can reveal the amount of resources available to cover household needs, but offers little
insight into household needs. Exhibit 13 presents the median household income by household size for both
King County and Renton. This data is slightly older than the 2012 estimates provided above, and is not
available for the Sunset Area.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 36 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 13
Exhibit 13
Median Household Income by Size, 2011
Source: American Community Survey, 2007-2011 5-year average.
x The median household income for single person households is similar for King County and Renton. Half
the single person households have an annual income of less than $39,500.
x Renton’s median household income for households with two or more people is below the King County
median.
x Households with 4 to 5 persons tend to have the highest household income, with households with more
than 5 persons having lower median household incomes. This suggests that large households (more than
5 persons) have less income per person and may be more likely to experience strain on household
finances.
Homeless Population
Estimating the total homeless population is difficult. In King County, a 2012 one-night analysis of
homelessness in King County found that 2,682 people were staying in shelters, 3,554 were in transitional
housing, and 2,594 were outside between the hours of 2 and 5 am on a January night. The total one night
homeless population was 8,830.
Unsheltered homeless counts illuminate the local gap in services for the homeless. Exhibit 14 shows
unsheltered homeless counts in Renton based on the Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness’s
counts. The one-night unsheltered homeless counts in Renton show unsheltered homelessness in the City
ranging from 71-84 persons over the last four years. These figures are known to undercount the unsheltered
homeless, since not all areas are searched and many homeless persons do not want to be seen. There are
likely individuals and families that are improvising with camping, sleeping in their cars, rotating through
motels, and spending nights in someone’s spare room or couch with no fixed living situation.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 37 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 14
Exhibit 14
Unsheltered Homeless Counts, 2010 – 2013
Source: Seattle/King County Coalition on Homelessness, 2013.
x The homelessness data in the chart above was collected during one-night-counts in January of each year.
x For all the areas listed, the one- night homeless counts have remained relatively stable. However, the
unsheltered homeless are only a small portion of the homeless population and significantly
underrepresent the entire homeless population. According to the Seattle/King County Coalition on
Homelessness, the one-night count numbers are always “assumed to be an undercount, because we do
not count everywhere, and because many people take great care not to be visible.”
In addition to the one-night-count numbers, Washington State school districts collect information on
homeless students, defined by lacking a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence. The McKinney-
Vento Homeless Act of 1987 requires school districts to provide transportation to and from school for
homeless students so that their access to school is not disrupted by becoming homeless. Exhibit 15 presents
the number of McKinney-Vento qualified students in Renton School District and Washington State for the
2011 – 2012 school year.
Exhibit 15
Homeless Students in Renton and Washington State, 2011 – 2012 School Year
Source: Office Superintendent of Public Instruction, 2013.
x In the 2011 – 12 school year, the Renton School District identified 341 students who met the legislative
definition of homeless. This includes students who lack a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime
residence such as children who are staying with others due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or are
living in temporary quarters such as a hotel, shelter, camp ground or vehicle.
Unsheltered Homeless Count 2010 2011 2012 2013 2010 2011 2012 2013
Men 9 13 15 22 919 860 882 897
Women 3 3 2 2 159 191 174 205
Gender Unknown 70 54 56 59 1,664 1,357 1,531 1,615
Minor (under 18) 2 1 - - 17 34 7 19
Total 84 71 73 83 2,759 2,442 2,594 2,736
Benches 1 0 0 2 42 21 23 16
Parking Garages 8 0 0 3 19 23 5 28
Cars/Trucks 27 39 55 37 891 767 791 878
Structures 10 8 3 11 316 249 348 353
Under Roadways 10 10 4 8 191 196 163 225
Doorways 5 4 3 2 136 131 154 163
City Parks 7 0 2 0 114 25 30 23
Brushes/undergrowth 3 1 2 2 129 89 77 88
Bus Stops 4 0 0 328422440
Alleys 0 0 016211448
Walking around 5 4 3 8 331 261 300 305
Other 4 5 1 7 546 617 665 569
Total 84 71 73 83 2,759 2,442 2,594 2,736
RENTON TOTAL Selected Areas
Shelters
Doubled
Up Unsheltered
Hotels or
Motels Total
Washington State 6,524 18,332 1,205 1,329 27,390
Renton School District 96 216 9 20 341
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 38 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 15
x The students identified as homeless often represent entire homeless families, including parents and
children who are not school age. Therefore, the count is only a small proportion of total homeless
persons.
x Most homeless students were living “doubled up,” that is living with a friend, relative, or other person
due to economic hardship or loss of housing.
Employment & Labor Force Participation
Employment and labor force participation are important economic indicators of self-sufficiency and
household resources. Exhibit 16 shows the percentage of civilians over 16 years old who are in the labor
force, as well as the percentage of the labor force that are unemployed for Renton and King County.
Exhibit 16
Labor Force Participation and Unemployment Rate for Civilians 16+ Years Old, 2007 – 2011 5-Year
Average
Source: American Community Survey, 2007 – 2011 5-year average.
x While Renton has a higher percentage of residents over 16 years old in the civilian labor force than the
County average, it also has a notably higher unemployment rate (8.4%) compared to the County (6.9%).
Housing Cost Burden
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines housing cost-burdened households
as households that spend 30% or more of their income on housing costs. Given how much cost-burdened
households spend on housing, these households may have difficulty affording necessities such as food,
clothing, transportation, and medical care. Exhibit 17 shows the percentage of cost-burdened households in
Renton by occupancy tenure for all income categories, as well as for households earning under $35,000 per
year. Since the median household income for King County was nearly $69,000 in 2011 (based on ACS
estimates), the second group serves as an approximation for households that earn 50% or less of the Area
Median Income (AMI).
Population
16+ Years Old
% in Civilian
Labor Force
Unemployment
Rate
Renton 70,232 73.8% 8.4%
King County 1,546,184 70.5% 6.9%
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 39 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 16
Exhibit 17
Percent of Renton Households Spending More than 30% of Income on Housing, 2007-2011 5-year
Average*
Source: American Community Survey, 2007-2011 5-year average.
* Counts for cost-burdened households include 209 households earning zero or negative income. It is uncertain what percentage of these
households are actually cost-burdened and what percentage are using savings or have no housing costs.
x A vast majority of households (82%) earning under $35,000 are spending more than 30% of their income
on housing, including nearly 87% of renter households and 74% of owner-occupied households.
x A smaller, but still substantial, percentage (43%) of all households are spending more than 30% of their
income on housing, including nearly 45% of renters and 41% of owners.
x The percentage of cost-burdened households in Renton is similar to King County overall, where 83% of
households earning under $35,000 are spending more than 30% of their income on housing and 40% of
all households are spending 30% of their income on housing.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 40 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 17
NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITY
This section presents data and measures on the economic, transportation, and educational opportunities
associated with Renton and the Sunset Area. Assessing opportunities in communities is an important
dimension of understanding overall needs. Areas with more economic, educational, mobility, and health
opportunities provide better support for individual and family success.
This first part of this section assesses economic and transportation/mobility opportunities using the Puget
Sound Regional Council’s (PSRC) opportunity indicator categories. PSRC, in partnership with the Kirwan
Institute, developed a series of indicators that represent several major categories of opportunity, including
economic health and transportation/mobility (discussed below). Every U.S. Census Tract in King County has
been assigned a rating. Ratings go from 1 (lowest opportunity rating) to 5 (highest opportunity rating) for
each of the major categories, and are based on the tract’s relative position in the County. This approach
allows helps identify disparities or gaps in opportunity across the County.
The remainder of the section provides a review of education as a key component of neighborhood
opportunity.
Economic Health
Economic Health measures a community’s economic opportunity and resiliency through an index based on:
x Access to living wage jobs. The percentage of regional jobs within 15 minutes of travel time by
automobile and 30 minutes travel time by public transit and that pay a living wage.
x Job growth trends. The difference in number of jobs between 2000 and 2010.
x Unemployment rate. The percentage of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Exhibit 18 shows the Economic Health rating distribution for Renton (23 tracts either fully or partially within
City boundaries), and the two tracts most associated with the Sunset Area (tracts 252 and 254). As the
distribution of indicators across the County serves as the benchmark for the rating system, there is an even
distribution of 20% for each of the ratings at the County level.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 41 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 18
Exhibit 18
Map of Economic Health Index by Census Tract in Renton, 2012
Source: PSRC, 2012; BERK, 2013.
*Renton tabulation geography includes 23 tracts either fully or partially within Renton city limits.
x Renton’s economic health ratings distribution is relatively similar to the County overall (which has 20%
for each rating), indicating that there is a wide variation of Economic Health Opportunity within Renton’s
city limits. However, Renton does have a slightly lower percentage of Census tracts that received a rating
of “5,” the highest opportunity rating.
x Both Census tracts (252 and 254) associated with the Sunset Area have a rating of “3”, placing it at
exactly the medium opportunity range for Economic Health (these tracts represent a much larger area
than the Sunset Area itself).
x As indicated by the map, tracts in (or partially in) the western and northern portions of the City appear to
have relatively high economic health ratings, while tracts in (or partially in) the eastern and southeastern
portions of the City rate relatively low.
x Areas with less employment opportunity and economic vitality include areas along the Cedar River and
the heavily residential area along 116th Avenue SE.
PSRC Rating Sunset Tracts:
252 & 254 Renton*
1 - Low Opp.0% 17%
2 0% 22%
3 100% 22%
4 0% 26%
5 - High Opp.0% 13%
Total # of Tracts 2 23
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 42 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 19
Transportation/Mobility
Mobility and affordable transportation options are critical for households to sustain employment and access
groceries, health care, and other basic services. Better transportation and mobility options for suburban
areas can ease the housing affordability gap for some populations. PSRC measures neighborhood
“Transportation/Mobility” opportunity based on four indicators:
x Transportation cost. The cost of the average commute to work, based on the distance traveled by a cost
$0.50 per mile.
x Access to transit. The percentage of total area within ¼ mile of an express bus stop.
x Transit cost. The cost of an average transit fare.
x Walkability. The percentage of commuters who walk to work.
Exhibit 19 provides a comparison of the Transportation/Mobility rating distribution for Renton (23 tracts
either fully or partially within City boundaries), and the tracts associated with the Sunset Area (tracts 252 and
254.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 43 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 20
Exhibit 19
Map of Mobility/Transportation Index by Census Tract in Renton, 2012
Source: PSRC, 2012; BERK, 2013.
*Renton tabulation geography includes 23 tracts either fully or partially within Renton city limits.
x Renton’s transportation/mobility ratings distribution is lower than the County overall, indicating that
transportation options are limited and mobility is poor across much of the City. Nearly 70% of tracts rate
at either “1” or “2”.
x The primary exception is the area West of I-405, in the City Center area, which rates highly, as well as a
few tracts in the southern and eastern portions of the City which rate relatively high. The Cedar River
Valley, Highlands, and East Plateau areas all have much more limited transportation and mobility
opportunity.
x The tracts associated with the Sunset Area rate as “1” and “2,” also indicating poor performance in this
category.
PSRC Rating Sunset Tracts:
252 & 254 Renton*
1 - Low Opp.50% 39%
2 50% 30%
3 0% 0%
4 0% 22%
5 - High Opp.0% 9%
Total # of Tracts 2 23
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 44 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 21
Means of Transportation and Travel Time to Work
Exhibit 20 shows the means of transportation for workers over 16 years old in Renton and King County,
while Exhibit 21 provides information on travel time to work for workers over 16 years who do not work
at home. These indicators provide a sense of how Renton compares to the County overall in terms of
convenience of and preference for using alternative modes of transportation (excluding car, truck, or
van) and commute burden.
Exhibit 20
Means of Transportation to Work, 2011-2013 3-year Average
Source: American Community Survey, 2011 – 2013 3-year average.
Exhibit 21
Travel Time to Work, 2011 – 2013 3-year Average
Source: American Community Survey, 2011 – 2013 3-year average.
x Renton has a substantially higher percentage (86.0%) of workers over 16 years old who travel to work via
car, truck, or van compared to the County overall (76.4%). It has a lower percentage of workers who use
public transportation (7.6% vs. 10.9% for the County overall) and a far lower percentage of workers who
walk or bicycle to work. This indicates that the convenience of and preference for using alternative
modes of transportation is lower in Renton than the County overall.
x Travel time to work for workers 16 and older not working at home in Renton is relatively similar to the
County overall, although the mean travel time is slightly higher for Renton (27.8 vs. 26.4 minutes). There
are a higher percentage of workers in Renton who have a commute of at least 30 minutes (45.6% vs.
41.0%) and of at least 60 minutes (7.4% vs. 6.8%). This indicates that Renton workers have a slightly
larger overall commute burden compared to the County average.
Renton King County
Total Workers 16 and Older 46,353 989,159
Car, Truck, or Van 86.0% 76.4%
Public transportation 7.6% 10.9%
Walked 1.3% 4.4%
Bicycle 0.2% 1.5%
Taxicab, motorcycle, or other 0.8% 1.1%
Worked at home 4.0% 5.8%
Renton King County
Total Workers 16 and Older
Not Working at Home 44,493 931,885
Less than 10 minutes 7.4% 9.1%
10 - 19 minutes 22.9% 26.5%
20 - 29 minutes 24.2% 23.4%
30 - 44 minutes 29.6% 25.6%
45 - 59 minutes 8.6% 8.6%
60 minutes or more 7.4% 6.8%
Mean Travel Time to Work
(in minutes)27.8 26.4
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 45 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 22
Education Opportunity
Access to quality educational opportunities is a significant part of a community’s overall opportunity. To
assess educational opportunities for children and youth, the analysis uses indicators developed by the Road
Map Project, a regional effort aimed at improving student achievement including grade-level reading and
graduation rates.
Grade level reading is an important indicator of student progress. The Road Map project uses the percent of
students meeting the reading standard by the end of 3rd grade as a performance indicator, due to its high
predictive value for high school graduation and attainment of post-secondary credentials.
Exhibit 22
Percent of Renton School District Students Meeting Grade Level Reading and Math Standards,
School Year 2012-13
Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Washington State Report Card, 2013.
x The percentage of Renton students meeting the statewide reading standard is about the same for the
state overall.
x In math, Renton students trend slightly better than the state overall in 3rd through 5th grade . The trend
ends in grades 6-8, where Renton trails the state’s overall rates for meeting the math standard.
READING
MATH
73%72%73%71%69%66%
74%73%73%71%
66%65%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Third Grade Fourth
Grade
Fifth Grade Sixth Grade Seventh
Grade
Eighth Grade
Washington State
Renton School District
65%63%63%59%64%
53%
71%
64%65%
50%
57%
52%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Third Grade Fourth
Grade
Fifth Grade Sixth Grade Seventh
Grade
Eighth Grade
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 46 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 23
Exhibit 23
Percent of Sunset Area School Students Meeting Grade Level Reading Standard,
School Year 2012-13
Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Washington State Report Card, 2013.
x School catchment areas cross through neighborhoods, making it difficult to assess the educational
opportunity for neighborhood-level geographies such as the Sunset Area. There are two elementary
schools serving the Sunset Area: Kennydale and Highlands. Kennydale Elementary School feeds into
McKnight Middle School and Highlands Elementary School feeds into Dimmitt Middle School.
x At the 3rd – 5th grade levels, Kennydale consistently performs better than the Renton School District in
the percentage of students meeting grade-level reading standard. However, Highlands performs
consistently worse than the School District average, especially at the Fourth and Fifth grade levels.
x Both McKnight and Dimmitt Middle Schools serve Sunset Area students. On grade-level reading,
McKnight Middle School performs consistently better than the School District while Dimmitt Middle
School performs worse in Sixth and Seventh Grade, but more similarly in Eighth Grade.
74%
73%
73%
80%
79%
80%
65%
62%
71%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%90%
Third Grade
Fourth Grade
Fifth Grade
Renton School District
Kennydale Elementary
Highlands Elementary
71%
66%
65%
83%
71%
70%
64%
58%
63%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Sixth Grade
Seventh Grade
Eighth Grade
Renton School District
McKnight Middle School
Dimmitt Middle School
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 47 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 24
Exhibit 24
Renton High Schools’ Graduation Rates, School Year 2010-11
Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, 2013.
Exhibit 24 presents the graduation rates for four of Renton’s high schools (Renton’s alternative high school
programs are not shown). Sunset Area students attend either Hazen High School (coming from McKnight
Middle School) or Renton High School (coming from Dimmitt Middle School).
x The overall Renton School District graduation rate is 79%, with 5% of students continuing after their peer
cohort graduates, and 16% of students dropping out some time during high school.
x The graduation rates for the traditional high schools in Renton are between 83% and 90%, however
alternative high schools in the District have lower graduation rates.
Exhibit 25 presents a comparison of the graduation rates of students who are white and students who are
races other than white (students of another racial category). While the overall graduation rate for Renton is
79%, the rate for white students is higher at 84% and the rate for students who are races other than white is
lower at 76%.
Exhibit 25
Racial Comparison of Renton High School Students’ Graduation Rates, School Year 2011-12
Source: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, 2013.
x In the Renton School District, almost one fifth (19%) of students who are races other than white drop out
of high school. It is unknown if students who leave Renton high schools go on to receive their diploma or
secondary school credential at all.
x There is a gap in graduation rates of 8 percentage points between white and students who are races
other than white, suggesting a disparity in educational opportunity.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 48 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 25
HEALTH & CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT
Exhibit 26
Five-Year Total Deaths per 100,000 of Top Five Causes of Death, 2007-2011
Source: Public Health of Seattle & King County, King County City Health Profile for Renton/Fairwood, December 2012.
x The top five causes of death in King County and Renton/Fairwood are, in descending order, cancer,
heart disease, stroke, chronic lower respiratory disease (CLRD), and accidents and external causes.
x Renton/Fairwood has a proportionally higher incidence of cancer, stroke, and CLRD, while King
County has a higher incidence of heart disease and accidents and external causes.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 49 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 26
Exhibit 27
Five-Year Percent of Adults 18+ with Negative Health Risk Factors and Chronic Disease, 2006-2010
Source: Public Health of Seattle & King County, King County City Health Profile for Renton/Fairwood, December 2012.
x “Health risk factors” are behaviors or characteristics that increase an individual’s likelihood of developing
a disease. These risk factors are important, as awareness of them can encourage people to make healthy
choices about their activities, habits, and diets. They are also, generally, chronic conditions that should
be monitored by a healthcare professional.
x Renton/Fairwood has a higher incidence rate than King County for seven of the eight health risk factors
listed above. The only indicator that Renton/Fairwood has a lower incidence of than King County is
excessive alcohol.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 50 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 27
Exhibit 28
Five-Year Percent of Adults with Inadequate Access to Care Indicators, 2006-2010
Source: Public Health of Seattle & King County, King County City Health Profile for Renton/Fairwood, December 2012.
x The “access to care indicators” charted above show the rates at which adults in King County and
Renton/Fairwood are not receiving specific preventative care or face a barrier to accessing care.
x Proportionally, people in Renton/Fairwood are more likely than people in King County overall to receive
a pap test or flu shot, however they are less likely to have a dental visit, mammogram, pneumonia
vaccination, and personal doctor.
x About half of residents in King County and Renton/Fairwood did not receive a flu shot during the last
year.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 51 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 28
HOUSING INVENTORY & AFFORDABILITY
The Growth Management Act requires each jurisdiction to conduct a current housing inventory to assess its
housing stock in terms of current and future housing needs. This section describes the City’s housing
inventory including the proportion of housing that is affordable to segments of the City’s population. King
County’s Countywide Planning Policies provide a framework for all jurisdictions to plan for and promote a
range of affordable, accessible, and healthy housing choices for current and future residents. In King County,
there is currently an unmet need for housing that is affordable for households earning less than 80 percent of
the Area Median Income.
This analysis assesses the housing supply of three areas. Exhibit 29 provides an overview map of Renton, the
Sunset Area, and the Potential Annexation Areas:
x City of Renton. All housing within the City of Renton. All Renton figures include the Sunset Area.
x Sunset Area. The Sunset Area includes 0.54 square miles. Some information is not available for the
Sunset Area due to its limited geographic scope and smaller number of people.
x Potential Annexation Areas (PAA). The potential annexation areas include areas of unincorporated King
County that may or may not be annexed into the City of Renton at a later time.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 52 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 29
Exhibit 29
Overview Map of Renton, the Sunset Area, and the Potential Annexation Areas
Source: City of Renton, 2013; BERK, 2013.
Housing Units
The housing inventory changes daily as new units are built and older units are torn down. The Washington
State Office of Financial Management estimates current housing units for all Washington jurisdictions over
time.
Exhibit 30 presents the proportion of housing units by unit type. The types include:
x One unit,
x Two or more units, and
x Mobile homes and special units. Special units include permanent residents living in travel trailers,
RVs, boats, sheds, tents, and others.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 53 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 30
Exhibit 30
Estimate of Housing Units, 2013
HOUSING UNIT ESTIMATES 2013
HOUSING UNIT ESTIMATES 2010 – 2013
Source: Office of Financial Management Forecasting Division, April 1, 2013.
x The majority of housing units in both Renton and King County are single family units (one unit). The
proportion is slightly higher for King County with 58% of all housing units being single family compared to
53% in Renton.
x Renton has added about 1,876 housing units between 2010 and 2013, resulting in a total of 40,806 units.
This represents a compound annual growth rate of 1.2% a year, more than twice the growth rate of King
County as a whole.
x Most additional housing units in Renton were Two or More units, similar to King County. Single Family
Unit growth has been limited in both Renton and King County between 2010 and 2013, with an average
annual growth of .8% and .3% respectively. The low rate of new housing growth can be somewhat
explained by the recession.
The King County Assessor’s office tracks all land use and housing stock in King County and enables summaries
at smaller geographic areas. Data sources and methods differ from the Office of Financial Management
Forecasting Division and are not directly comparable. Exhibit 31 presents the housing counts for Renton, the
Sunset Area, and the PAA.
2010 2011 2012 2013
Change 2010 -
2013
Compound
Annual Growth
Rate
Renton Total 38,930 40,005 40,404 40,806 1,876 1.2%
One Unit 20,883 21,029 21,252 21,580 697 0.8%
Two or more 17,094 18,009 18,184 18,257 1,163 1.7%
Mobile Homes and Specials 953 967 968 969 16 0.4%
King County Total 851,261 857,349 861,946 869,470 18,209 0.5%
One Unit 494,230 496,204 498,121 500,591 6,361 0.3%
Two or more 338,645 342,852 345,550 350,612 11,967 0.9%
Mobile Homes and Specials 18,386 18,293 18,275 18,267 (119) -0.2%
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 54 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 31
Exhibit 31
Number of Housing Units, 2013
Source: King County Assessor’s Office, 2013; BERK, 2013.
x The Sunset Area has a relatively greater proportion of its housing in multi-family stock, reflecting the
number of apartment units in the area.
x The Potential Annexation Areas are the reverse, and are mostly dominated by single-family housing.
Age of housing is a factor in the quality of housing and how much housing costs to maintain. Older homes
typically have less efficient furnaces, insulation, windows, and appliances which lead to higher operating
costs compared to newer housing construction. Exhibit 32 presents the number of units by year built for the
City of Renton.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 55 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 32
Exhibit 32
Existing Renton Housing Units by Year Built, 2013
Source: King County Assessor’s Office, 2013; BERK, 2013. Housing Unit types are defined based on the ownership/taxing status of the
underlying land.
x There is a broad range in housing age in Renton, starting with 1900.
x Apartment construction began in 1940, with large booms in the 1960’s, 1980’s, and again in the 2000’s.
x Prior to the beginning of the current economic downturn, Renton saw a significant expansion of its
housing market with 27.7% of its housing stock built after 2000.
x In addition to the units listed above, the Office of Financial Management estimates 969 mobile home and
special dwellings in the City of Renton (April 1, 2013 estimate). The average age of mobile home units is
unknown, though many are substandard with inadequate and failing systems.
Under normal circumstances, a new residential unit can be expected to have an effective, useful life of 40-50
years before it becomes functionally obsolete. The useful lifespan can be expanded indefinitely with
continued maintenance and re-investment. About 19% of housing in Renton was built before 1959, making it
over 50 years old. The vast majority of this older housing is single-units or duplexes. In addition, a significant
portion of housing built in the 1940s, some of which is still owned by the Renton Housing Authority, was built
quickly under extraordinary circumstances for the war defense industry. This housing was intended as
temporary housing for war defense workers, who were expected to return to their original communities after
the war. Much of this housing is still in use today, and likely is approaching functional obsolesce. Further
analysis is needed to estimate the useful lifespan of the current housing stock.
Year Built Total Percent
1900 - 1909 310 0.8%
1910 - 1919 237 0.6%
1920 - 1929 458 1.2%
1930 - 1939 345 0.9%
1940 - 1949 2,114 5.3%
1950 - 1959 3,671 9.3%
1960 - 1969 6,371 16.1%
1970 - 1979 3,548 9.0%
1980 - 1989 6,903 17.4%
1990 - 1999 5,498 13.9%
2000 - 2009 9,267 23.4%
2010 & Later 888 2.2%
259
235
429
312
2,051
3,281
3,663
1,753
1,830
2,104
4,946
697
2
-
583
571
995
1,615
1,696
51
63
386
2,125
1,224
4,078
1,779
2,625
- 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000
Single Family Codos Apartments
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 56 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 33
Housing Attainability
A contributing factor of whether housing is attainable for a household is whether the household’s income can
support the cost of the housing. King County’s Countywide Planning Polices require each jurisdiction to assess
the affordability of its housing inventory and to plan for meeting local needs for affordable housing as well as
accommodating a share of the countywide need for affordable housing.
Affordability
The Countywide Planning Policies provide guidelines for determining housing affordability using Area Median
Income (AMI) to establish housing market segments ranging from Very-Low Income Housing Needs to
Moderate Housing Income Needs. Area Median Income is the midpoint of all household income, so that half
the households earn more than the median income and half the households earn less than the median
Exhibit 33 presents the Area Median Income estimates for King County, using three different data sources.
The U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) AMI of $86,700 relates to a family of four,
which is different than the true median which would be based on all households of every household size in a
community. The median household income estimate for King County reported by the American Community
Survey (ACS) is $70,767, quite a bit less than HUD’s estimate. For purposes of determining housing
affordability, this analysis uses the American Community Survey (5 year estimate) for King County.
The Countywide Planning Polices require jurisdictions to analyze housing affordability using 30%, 50%, and
80% ratios to the HUD published Area Median Income. Exhibit 33 also presents the upper income bounds of
each Housing Need category.
Exhibit 33
Housing Need Income Thresholds Based on Area Median Income
Source: Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2013; American Community Survey, 2011 1-year estimate.
Estimating Households by Percent of Median Income
To estimate the demand for affordable housing, the analysis estimates the number of households that belong
to each of the Housing Need categories. The American Community Survey (ACS) provides information on the
number of households by income in $5,000 to $10,000 income ranges, but not the number of households
according to ratios of Area Median Income (AMI). Using the available household income data, this analysis
groups households according to affordability income categories (Exhibit 33). In cases where the income
category falls between the income ranges reported by the ACS, we assume that households are evenly
distributed within the ACS’s household income range. For example, if there are 5,000 households in the
$20,000 to $24,999 income range, we assume there are 1,000 households with income between $20,000 to
$21,000, or 20% of that income range’s households. If 30% of the County’s median income was $21,000, to
estimate the number of households at or below 30% of median income, the methods includes all households
below $20,000 plus the 1,000 households assumed to earn between $20,000 and $21,000.
Using King County’s 2011 area median income of $70,567, Exhibit 34 presents the estimated number of
households in each income category for King County, City of Renton, and the Sunset Area. In the most recent
County Wide Planning Polices, King County estimates that 12% of households in King County have incomes at
Source: HUD AMI ACS
Upper Bounds of Income Category
King County
(2013 Dollars)
King County
(2011 Dollars)
Area Median Income $86,700 $70,567
Moderate Income Housing Need (80% of AMI) $69,360 $56,454
Low Income Housing Need (50% of AMI) $43,350 $35,284
Very-Low Income Housing Need (30% of AMI) $26,010 $21,170
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 57 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 34
30% or below AMI. This analysis, using ACS 2011 5-year estimates (the best available estimates with least
margin of error) estimates approximately 13% of all households having income at 30% or below AMI.
Exhibit 34
Household Estimates by Percentage Median Income, 2011 dollars
Source: King County figures based on American Community Survey 2007 – 2011 5-year average; Renton and Sunset Area estimates from Esri;
BERK, 2013. Figures may not add to total due to rounding.
x Very-low Income Housing Need. Households with incomes 30% of AMI or less have an estimated annual
income up to $21,000. This represents approximately 104,908 households in King County with very
limited resources to spend on housing. As a result, this is the housing need category most unmet by
market forces and for which jurisdictions must employ policy and planning tools to ensure housing is
attainable for these households. Countywide Planning Policies suggest that 12% of a jurisdiction’s total
housing supply should be affordable to these households.
x Low Income Housing Need. Households with incomes between 30 and 50 percent of AMI have incomes
that range from $21,000 to $35,000. Countywide Planning policies suggest that 12% of jurisdictions’ total
housing supply be attainable to households in this income range.
x Moderate Income Housing Need. Households with incomes between 50 and 80 percent of AMI have
annual incomes between $35,000 and $56,000, representing 124,325 households in King County. County
Wide Planning Polices suggest 16% of jurisdiction’s total housing supply be attainable to households in
this income range.
x Renton has slightly greater proportions than King County of its households in the lower income housing
need categories. The difference is even greater for the Sunset Area.
x Relative to King County, both Renton and the Sunset Area have smaller proportions of households
earning more than 120% of King County’s Median Income.
Affordability of Renter Occupied Housing
The most fundamental categories of housing supply and demand are rental housing versus owner-occupied
housing. The type of occupancy may be reflective of the housing type, but not always. There are increasingly
more attached units available for purchase such as condominiums and townhomes, as well as single-family
detached housing that is renter-occupied. In general, attached housing, such as apartments, is less expensive
partly owing to the lower cost of land per unit and thus serves a greater proportion of lower-income
households. To improve understanding of housing attainability for households with lower incomes, we
examine the income distribution of households who rent compared to the supply of available rental housing.
Exhibit 35 presents the estimated percent (and count) of renter households in King County and Renton
according to the Housing Need category. The exhibit draws on self-reported rents that households pay and
accounts for subsidies or other housing benefits used by the current renting population. As a result, the rents
Ratio to
King County AMI
$70,567
Low High
Estimated
HHs Percent
Estimated
HHs Percent
Estimated
HHs Percent
Under 30% $0 $21,000 104,908 13% 5,763 15% 328 29%
30 - 50% $21,000 $35,000 83,664 11% 5,070 14% 178 16%
50 - 80% $35,000 $56,000 124,325 16% 7,167 19% 228 20%
80 - 100% $56,000 $71,000 82,397 10% 4,423 12% 124 11%
100 - 120% $71,000 $85,000 64,872 8% 3,100 8% 69 6%
120% or Over $85,000 $1,000,001 329,904 42% 11,666 31% 214 19%
Total 790,070 100% 37,225 100% 1,144 100%
King County City of Renton Sunset Area
Rounded (1,000s)
Income Ranges
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 58 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 35
described in Exhibit 35 are not reflective of current market prices. For example, if the household occupies a
subsidized housing unit, the respondent would report the rent they pay not the full market value of the unit.
Exhibit 35
Renter Households by Housing Need Category, 2011
Source: American Community Survey, 2007 – 2011 5-year estimates.
x In 2011, there were an estimated 319,385 households renting in King County and 15,721 households
renting in Renton. The distribution of renting households across income categories is similar between
Renton and King County, with renter households represented in all housing need categories.
x In Renton, about 27% of renting households have incomes at or above area median income, which is
similar to King County.
x In Renton, about 21% of renting households earn 30% of AMI or less. This represents approximately
3,318 households with very limited income for housing costs.
Whereas Exhibit 35 presents the number of households according to Housing Need category, Exhibit 36
compares the number of renter households by housing need category to the number of units being rented at
rents affordable to each category. Exhibit 36 compares renters (people) with housing rents (unit costs) and
does not speak to the housing burden of any particular household or group. Very low income households
may be renting at prices much more than they can afford, and median and upper income households may be
paying a small proportion of their monthly income on rent.
Low High
Estimated
HHs Percent
Estimated
HHs Percent
Under 30% $0 $21,000 77,996 24% 3,318 21%
30 - 50% $21,000 $35,000 53,460 17% 2,625 17%
50 - 80% $35,000 $56,000 65,160 20% 3,380 22%
80 - 100% $56,000 $71,000 36,100 11% 2,146 14%
100 - 120% $71,000 $85,000 23,446 7% 1,348 9%
120% or Over $85,000 $1,000,001 63,223 20% 2,904 18%
Total 319,385 100% 15,721 100%
King County City of Renton
Rounded (1,000s)
Income Ranges
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 59 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 36
Exhibit 36
Renton Rental Unit Gap Analysis
*Estimated monthly housing budget based on 30% of monthly gross income.
Source: American Community Survey, 2007 – 2011 5-year estimates; BERK, 2013.
In March 2011, the average market rent for an apartment was $983 (Dupre & Scott, 2012). This is well above
the self-reported rents presented in Exhibit 36.The self-reported rents reflect what households pay, including
any discounts or subsidies. For example, Renton Housing Authority, along with rent vouchers ported in from
other public housing authorities, subsidizes approximately 1,700 units of housing in Renton (see Exhibit 37).
These subsidized units likely account for a large portion of the households that report paying less than $525
per month in rent and some portion of the households that pay less than $875 per month in rent. There are
also other housing subsidies, at much smaller scales, offered by other organizations. Accounting for all the
non-market factors that may reduce the rent a household pays, the gap analysis demonstrates:
x There are approximately 3,318 renting households in Renton with incomes under 30% of AMI. There are
also about 1,181 households paying rents that would be affordable to the upper bounds of this income
range ($21,000 annual income). As a result, there is a gap in housing units affordable to this Housing
Need category of 2,137 units (though, based on income alone, the gap is likely higher, as most
households in the Under 30% AMI housing need category do not have annual incomes close to $21,000).
x Renton has more units with rents affordable to households with annual incomes of $21,000 to $35,000
than there are households earning those annual incomes. It is likely that many households in the very
low-income category (less than $21,000 annual income) are renting in the $525- $875 monthly rent
range. These households would be considered “rent burdened” because they are spending more than
30% of their income on rent.
x The upper bound of this market segment is renting below the average market rent of $983 per month.
Housing quality issues may partly explain the lower rents in this group of units.
x About 18% of Renton’s renting households have annual incomes of $85,000 and above (above AMI).
There are only 668 units currently being rented at the “affordability” threshold for these households,
suggesting that many of these households are paying less than 30% of their income on rents. This
population represents a market segment that might be suitable for entry-level homeownership housing.
Ratio to KC AMI Estimated Gap
$70,567 Low High
Low High Count Percent Units over/(under)
Under 30% $0 $21,000 $0 $525 3,318 21% 1,181 (2,137)
30 - 50% $21,000 $35,000 $525 $875 2,625 17% 3,796 1,170
50 - 80% $35,000 $56,000 $875 $1,400 3,380 22% 7,691 4,311
80 - 100% $56,000 $71,000 $1,400 $1,775 2,146 14% 1,776 (370)
100 - 120% $71,000 $85,000 $1,775 $2,125 1,348 9% 314 (1,034)
120% or Over $85,000 $2,125 $0 2,904 18% 668 (2,236)
Total 15,721 15,426
+Monthly Housing
Income Ranges Budget*Estimated Renter HHs
v
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 60 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 37
Exhibit 37
Renton Housing Authority Subsidized Rental Units, 2013
Source: Renton Housing Authority, 2013.
Rents vary according to unit size, and household size relative to income is an indicator of the housing needs
of a community. Data on the number of households in specific income brackets by household size are not
available for the City of Renton or the Sunset Area. However, in 2010 HUD developed a special tabulation of
households by income category, household size, and housing tenure. These data are available at the county
level. HUD’s methodology for determining income varies from the American Community Survey, therefore
income numbers are not comparable.
Exhibit 38 presents the number of households by household size in specific income categories for King
County (2010 data).
x The data demonstrate the dominance of 1 person households in King County, which represent more than
half of all income categories under $34,999 a year.
x Large households (5 or more persons) are represented across all income categories.
Number
of Units Subsidy Type
Elderly Public Housing
Hillcrest Terrace 60 Public Housing
Evergreen Terrace 50 Public Housing
Senior Project Based
Houser Terrace 104 Local program
Cedar River Terrace 72 Project-based Section 8
Golden Pines Apartments 53 Project-based Section 8
Family
Cedar Park Apartments 244 Local program
Sunset Terrace 100 PublicHousing
Cole Manor 28 Public Housing
Chantelle 17 Local Program
Rolling Hills Townhomes 15 Local Program
Highland House 15 Local Program
YWCA Vision House 15 Project-based Section 8
Brickshire 12 Local Program
Glennwood Townhomes 8 Local Program
Liberty Square 92 Tax credit
Vouchers
Section 8 allocated to RHA 331 Tenant-based Section 8
Section 8 from other PHAs 475 Tenant-based Section 8
VASH 22 Veterans
TOTAL 1,713
Affordable Housing
Properties
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 61 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 38
Exhibit 38
King County Renting Households by Household Size and Income, 2010
Source: HUD Economic and Market Analysis Division, Special Tabulations of 2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Survey Data.
Apartment Rents and Vacancy Rates
The best available data on current market rents is the apartment rents survey conducted by Dupree and
Scott. Dupre and Scott conduct on-going surveys of apartments in the Puget Sound Region.Exhibit 39
presents the average rent and market vacancies for Renton from 2005 to 2012, the most current available
estimate. Market vacancy figures do not include units undergoing renovation or lease up.
Total 1-person 2-persons 3-persons 4-persons 5+ persons
Less than $10,000 33,670 23,215 5,205 2,870 1,305 1,075
$10,000 to $14,999 20,735 12,830 4,450 1,655 1,155 645
$15,000 to $24,999 38,655 21,230 7,735 4,395 2,795 2,500
$25,000 to $34,999 39,090 21,590 8,650 3,815 2,565 2,465
$35,000 to $49,999 52,115 23,705 15,425 6,285 3,930 2,765
$50,000 to $74,999 58,885 21,110 21,175 8,520 4,335 3,755
$75,000 to $99,999 33,355 9,580 13,275 5,275 2,960 2,265
$100,000 to $149,999 24,895 5,605 10,520 4,365 2,765 1,640
$150,000 to $199,999 6,580 925 2,985 1,145 710 815
$200,000 or more 5,455 1,235 1,930 915 840 535
Total by Size 313,435 141,025 91,350 39,240 23,360 18,460
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 62 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 39
Exhibit 39
Average Apartment Rents and Vacancy Rates in Renton, 2005-2012
Source: Dupre and Scott, 2012; BERK, 2013. All observations were for September of each respective year.
x Average rents dropped following Renton’s peak vacancy rate in 2009 at 8.3% to a low of $953 in 2010.
x Since 2009, apartment vacancy rates have continued to drop ending at 5.5% in 2012, with a corollary
increase in average rents to $1,083. A 5% market vacancy is considered healthy, with slightly higher
vacancy rates expected in more suburban markets. If vacancies continue to remain at around 5%, or drop
below 5%, average rents will likely increase.
Exhibit 40 presents a comparison of the current market prices for rental housing in Renton with HUD’s
published fair market rents for King County. It demonstrates that in reference to the County, the rental
housing market in Renton’s is similar to “fair” housing prices determined by HUD.
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 63 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 40
Exhibit 40
Comparison of Fair Market Rents and Current Market Prices
Source: HUD, 2013; Dupre & Scott, 2013.
x Based on this comparison of HUD Fair Market rents and current market prices in Renton (according to
Dupre & Scott), Renton’s costs are slightly higher for studios and 1 bedroom rentals, almost the same for
2 bedroom rentals, and substantially lower for 3 bedroom rentals.
Exhibit 41
Renton Gross Rent by Bedroom
Source: American Community Survey, 2007-2011 5-year estimates.
x Of the housing units occupied by renter households, it is estimated that 6,537 (42%) are 2 bedroom
units. The American Community Survey (ACS) estimates that 4,271 of these 2-bedroom rental units (65%)
cost more than $1,000 per month.
x The ACS estimates that 32% of housing units occupied by renter households are 1 bedroom, with 1,978
(40%) of these units costing between $750 - $999 per month, and 1,346 (27%) costing more than $1,000
per month.
No Bedroom
1
bedroom
2
bedrooms
3+
bedrooms Total
Category
%
Less than $200 22 84 25 33 164 1%
$200 to $299 62 257 72 30 421 3%
$300 to $499 14 248 112 87 461 3%
$500 to $749 236 995 190 231 1,652 11%
$750 to $999 164 1,978 1,817 352 4,311 27%
$1,000 or more 61 1,346 4,271 2,739 8,417 54%
No cash rent 8 50 50 187 295 2%
Total 567 4,958 6,537 3,659 15,721
Percent of Total 4% 32% 42% 23%
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 64 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 41
Overcrowding
HUD defines an overcrowded housing unit as one where there is an average of more than 1 person living per
room. The table below shows the percentage of rental units that are overcrowded for the Sunset Census
Tracts, Renton, and King County.
Exhibit 42
Percentage of Rental Units that are Overcrowded, 2007-2011 5-year Average
Source: American Community Survey, 2007-2011 5-year average.
* The Sunset Tracts include all of Tracts 252 and 254, which the Sunset Area is within. However, the Sunset Tracts represent a much
larger area than the Sunset Area itself.
x Renton has a slightly higher percentage of rental units that are overcrowded (5.7%) than the County
overall (4.7%). The Sunset Census Tracts have almost twice the rate of overcrowding than the County
overall, indicating that overcrowding may be a significant issue in this portion of the City.
Owner Occupied Housing
Home ownership brings greater neighborhood stability and has historically been a significant driver of
personal and household wealth for individuals and families. A key aspect to addressing a community’s
housing needs is to ensure there are opportunities for home ownership for moderate-income levels and first
time homebuyers. The exhibits below assess the opportunity in Renton’s owner-occupied housing market
based on housing need category. Exhibit 43 shows the distribution of households living in owner occupied
housing in Renton and King County by housing need category.
Exhibit 43
Owner Tenure Household by Housing Need Category, 2012
Source: American Community Survey, 2007 – 2011 5 year estimates.
x Both King County and Renton have households who own their housing across all housing need
categories.
King County Renton Sunset Tracts*
Occupants per room
0.50 or less 567,433 25,211 4,179
0.51 to 1.00 202,917 9,514 1,287
1.01 to 1.50 13,651 1,041 331
1.51 to 2.00 5,118 189 30
2.01 or more 951 70 21
Number of Overcrowded Units (> 1) 19,720 1,300 382
Percent of Units that are Overcrowded (>1) 4.7% 5.7% 10.1%
Low High
Estimated
HHs Percent
Estimated
HHs Percent
Under 30% $0 $21,000 26,912 6% 1,212 6%
30 - 50% $21,000 $35,000 30,204 6% 1,616 8%
50 - 80% $35,000 $56,000 59,165 13% 3,123 15%
80 - 100% $56,000 $71,000 46,297 10% 2,573 13%
100 - 120% $71,000 $85,000 41,426 9% 2,320 11%
120% or Over $85,000 $1,000,001 266,682 57% 9,460 47%
Total 470,685 100% 20,304 100%
King County City of Renton
Rounded (1,000s)
Income Ranges
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 65 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 42
x Renton has a slightly higher proportion of owner-occupied housing in the middle-income categories (50%
of AMI to 120% of AMI).
x Renton has a slightly lower proportion of households with incomes over 120% of AMI living in owner-
occupied housing.
To illustrate the types of housing that are needed at various income levels, Exhibit 44 presents the number of
households living in owner-occupied housing by housing size and income category in 2010.
Exhibit 44
King County Owning Households by Household Size and Income, 2010
Source: Source: HUD Economic and Market Analysis Division, Special Tabulations of 2010 ACS 5-Year Survey Data
x More than half of households who live in owner-occupied housing with incomes less than $34,999 are 1-
person households.
x Most households living in owner occupied housing with more than 2 persons have annual incomes of
more than $50,000.
Exhibit 45 provides median sales prices in Renton over the last nine years by housing type, and Exhibit 46
estimates the income needed to purchase a home, as well as the percentage of households that meet the
income thresholds.
TOTAL 1-person 2-persons 3-persons 4-persons 5+ persons
Less than $10,000 9,430 6,360 1,860 535 435 245
$10,000 to $14,999 7,410 5,265 1,200 385 340 220
$15,000 to $24,999 18,395 11,355 4,605 1,425 740 270
$25,000 to $34,999 23,770 11,885 7,495 1,845 1,510 1,025
$35,000 to $49,999 42,340 17,790 15,155 4,285 3,230 1,880
$50,000 to $74,999 79,445 23,570 30,555 11,720 8,310 5,290
$75,000 to $99,999 76,185 14,610 29,375 13,815 11,890 6,490
$100,000 to $149,999 109,400 11,445 40,725 22,815 23,365 11,045
$150,000 to $199,999 49,745 2,825 18,325 11,345 11,935 5,310
$200,000 or more 52,415 3,805 19,500 10,920 12,370 5,820
Total by Size 468,535 108,910 168,795 79,090 74,125 37,595
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 66 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 43
Exhibit 45
Renton Median Sales Prices, Jan 2005 – 2013
Source: Zillow.com Real Estate Market Reports (http://www.zillow.com/local-info/)
* Some condo data is suppressed due to a low number of sales.
x In July 2013, Renton’s median sales price across all units was $306,300, almost $100,000 less than King
County’s median selling price of $403,400 (not shown).
x Home prices in Renton have trended downward in recent years due to the economic recession, and
despite a recent uptick are still notably lower than their peak in 2007 and 2008.
x In Renton, single family units have a median sales price of $330,900, much higher than the median sales
price of condominiums at $149,800. The vast majority of housing sales in Renton are single family units.
x Housing prices peaked in 2007 – 2008, with a high median sales price of $402,300 in December of 2007,
followed by a drop in prices through the beginning of 2013. Apartment rents have been rising since 2010,
housing prices are expected to begin to rise as well as the economy recovers from the recession and
mortgage interest rates remain low.
Exhibit 46 presents an assessment of the attainability of housing at current median sales prices using
standard assumptions, including:
x A down payment of 20% of the sale price
x Interest rate of 5.5%
x 30 year fixed rate mortgage
x Taxes at 10.9%
x Insurance at $3.50 per $1,000 value
x Housing cost burden not to exceed 30% of gross income
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 67 of 85
CITY OF RENTON | COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR HUMAN SERVICES AND HOUSING
APPENDIX A – BASELINE COMMUNITY CONDITIONS
June 2014 44
Exhibit 46
Annual Income Needed to Purchase a Home at Current Median Selling Price, 2013
Source: Zillow.com, 2013; ACS, 2011; BERK, 2013
x The analysis suggests that an annual income of at least $75,620 is required to purchase a single family
home at the current median selling price. There are an estimated 13,587 households in Renton with
incomes greater than $75,000. Based on this analysis, about 50% of Renton’s’ recent house sales (all
sales at the median price or less) would be affordable to about 37% of Renton households.
x Current condominium prices present a more affordable housing ownership opportunity. Our analysis
estimates that households with incomes of $35,000 would be able to afford a condominium at current
median prices, making condominium ownership affordable for a much higher percentage of the
population (71%) than single family home ownership.
Single Family Condominiums
Monthly Mortgage Monthly Mortgage
Median Selling Price $330,900 Median Se lling Price $149,800
Down Payment (20%) $66,180 Down Payment (20%) $29,960
Mortgage Amount $264,720 Mortgage Amount $119,840
Interest Rate 5.50%Interest Rate 5.50%
Payments over 30 years 360 Payments over 30 years 360
Monthly Mortgage Payment $1,496 Monthly Mortgage Payment $680
Annual Housing Expenses Annual Housing Expenses
Mortgage Payments $17,954 Mortgage Payments $8,165
Taxes (10.9%)$3,620 Taxes (10.9%)$1,639
Insurance ($3.50 per $1000)$1,112 Insurance ($3.50 per $1000)$503
Annual $22,686 A nnual $10,307
Monthly $1,891 Monthly $859
Monthly Income Needed $6,302 Monthly Income Needed $2,863
Annual Income Needed $75,620 A nnual Income Needed $34,358
Households Households
Number of households with Number of households with
with income > $75,000 13,587 with income >$35,000 26,355
Total households 37,225 Total households 37,225
Estimate of households that 37% Estimate of households that 71%
can afford median home price can afford median condo price
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 68 of 85
ϭ
&LW\RI5HQWRQ
&RPPXQLW\1HHGV$VVHVVPHQWIRU+XPDQ6HUYLFHVDQG+RXVLQJ
WW E/y
sZ/> ^Ed^KhZ ^
Ύ/ƚĞŵƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂŶĂƐƚĞƌŝƐŬƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂĚǀĂŶĐĞĚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉƚŚĞĞdžŚŝďŝƚƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞůŝŶŬĞĚĚĂƚĂƐŽƵƌĐĞ;ƐͿ
y,//d
ηdŽƉŝĐ ^ŽƵƌĐĞǁŝƚŚ>ŝŶŬĂŶĚdĂďůĞη
WKWh>d/KEEKDDhE/dz,Zd Z/^d/^
ϭZĞŶƚŽŶWŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶtĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ^ƚĂƚĞKĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ&ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ&ŽƌĞĐĂƐƚŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŽĨŵ͘ǁĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽƉͬĂƉƌŝůϭͬĚĞĨĂƵůƚ͘ĂƐƉ
Ϯ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ
WŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ ^Z/ĂƚĂ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂWƌŽĨŝůĞ;ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ
ϯZĞŶƚŽŶĂŶĚ^ƵŶƐĞƚ
ƌĞĂŐĞŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶ
h͘^͘ĞĐĞŶŶŝĂůĞŶƐƵƐ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WͲϭͲĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
ϰ
ZĞŶƚŽŶĂŶĚ<ŝŶŐ
ŽƵŶƚLJƌŽĂĚŐĞ
ĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ
h͘^͘ĞĐĞŶŶŝĂůĞŶƐƵƐ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WͲϭͲĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
ϱ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ^ŝnjĞ
h͘^͘ĞĐĞŶŶŝĂůĞŶƐƵƐ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗,ϭϯͲ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ^ŝnjĞ
^Z/ĂƚĂ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂĂŶĚZĞŶƚŽŶWƌŽĨŝůĞƐ;ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ
ϲZĂĐŝĂůŽŵƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶ
h͘^͘ĞĐĞŶŶŝĂůĞŶƐƵƐ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WͲϭͲĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ;ĞŶƐƵƐͿ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϮͲ^ŽĐŝĂůŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ;^Ϳ
^Z/ĂƚĂ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂWƌŽĨŝůĞ;ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ
ϳ>ĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ^ƉŽŬĞŶĂƚ
,ŽŵĞ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗ϭϲϬϬϭͲ>ĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ^ƉŽŬĞŶĂƚŚŽŵĞ
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 69 of 85
June 2014
/dzK&Z EdKEͮKDDhE/dzE ^^^ ^^D Ed&KZ,hDE^ Zs/ ^E,Kh^/E'
WW E/yʹKDDhE/dzKE/d/KE^^KhZ >/^d
Ϯ
ϴZĞĨƵŐĞĞŽƵŶƚƌŝĞƐŽĨ
KƌŝŐŝŶ;t^ƚĂƚĞͿ
h͘^͘KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨZĞĨƵŐĞĞZĞƐĞƚƚůĞŵĞŶƚ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĂĐĨ͘ŚŚƐ͘ŐŽǀͬƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐͬŽƌƌͬƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞͬƌĞĨƵŐĞĞͲĂƌƌŝǀĂůͲĚĂƚĂ
,Kh^ ,K> KEKD/^
ϵĚƵůƚWŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
>ŝǀŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĂŝƐĂďŝůŝƚLJ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϮͲ^ŽĐŝĂůŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
ϭϬDĞĚŝĂŶ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ
/ŶĐŽŵĞ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϯͲ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
^Z/ĂƚĂ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂĂŶĚZĞŶƚŽŶWƌŽĨŝůĞƐ;ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ
ϭϭ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ/ŶĐŽŵĞ
^ĞŐŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϯͲ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
^Z/ĂƚĂ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂĂŶĚZĞŶƚŽŶWƌŽĨŝůĞƐ;ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ
ϭϮ&ĂŵŝůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚ^EW
ĞŶĞĨŝƚƐ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϯͲ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
ϭϯDĞĚŝĂŶ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ
/ŶĐŽŵĞďLJ^ŝnjĞ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗ϭϵϬϭϵͲDĞĚŝĂŶ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ/ŶĐŽŵĞďLJ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ^ŝnjĞ
ϭϰhŶƐŚĞůƚĞƌĞĚ,ŽŵĞůĞƐƐ
ĐŽƵŶƚƐ
^ĞĂƚƚůĞͬ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJŽĂůŝƚŝŽŶŽŶ,ŽŵĞůĞƐƐŶĞƐƐ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚŽŵĞůĞƐƐŝŶĨŽ͘ŽƌŐͬƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐͬƉƵďůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ƉŚƉ
ϭϱ,ŽŵĞůĞƐƐ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐKĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚŽĨWƵďůŝĐ/ŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ;K^W/Ϳ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŬϭϮ͘ǁĂ͘ƵƐͬ,ŽŵĞůĞƐƐĞĚͬĚĂƚĂ͘ĂƐƉdž
ϭϲ>ĂďŽƌ&ŽƌĐĞ
WĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŽŶ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϯͲ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
ϭϳ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƐƚƵƌĚĞŶ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗ϮϱϭϬϲͲdĞŶƵƌĞďLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƐƚ
E /',KZ,KKKWWKZdhE/dz
ϭϴ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐ,ĞĂůƚŚ
/ŶĚĞdžΎ
WƵŐĞƚ^ŽƵŶĚZĞŐŝŽŶĂůŽƵŶĐŝů;DĂƉƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚďLJ Z<ƵƐŝŶŐW^ZĚĂƚĂͿ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ƉƐƌĐ͘ŽƌŐͬŐƌŽǁƚŚͬŐƌŽǁŝŶŐͲƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐͬƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůͲ
ĞƋƵŝƚLJͬŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJͲŵĂƉƉŝŶŐͬ
ϭϵDŽďŝůŝƚLJͬdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽ
Ŷ/ŶĚĞdžΎ
WƵŐĞƚ^ŽƵŶĚZĞŐŝŽŶĂůŽƵŶĐŝů;DĂƉƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚďLJ Z<ƵƐŝŶŐW^ZĚĂƚĂͿ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ƉƐƌĐ͘ŽƌŐͬŐƌŽǁƚŚͬŐƌŽǁŝŶŐͲƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐͬƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůͲ
ĞƋƵŝƚLJͬŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJͲŵĂƉƉŝŶŐͬ
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 70 of 85
June 2014
/dzK&Z EdKEͮKDDhE/dzE ^^^ ^^D Ed&KZ,hDE^ Zs/ ^E,Kh^/E'
WW E/yʹKDDhE/dzKE/d/KE^^KhZ >/^d
ϯ
ϮϬ
DĞĂŶƐŽĨ
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽ
tŽƌŬ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗^ϬϴϬϭͲŽŵŵƵƚŝŶŐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
ϮϭdƌĂǀĞůdŝŵĞƚŽǁŽƌŬ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗^ϬϴϬϭͲŽŵŵƵƚŝŶŐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
ϮϮZĞŶƚŽŶ^^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ
DĞĞƚŝŶŐ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚŽĨWƵďůŝĐ/ŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ;K^W/Ϳ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬƌĞƉŽƌƚĐĂƌĚ͘ŽƐƉŝ͘ŬϭϮ͘ǁĂ͘ƵƐͬƐƵŵŵĂƌLJ͘ĂƐƉdž͍LJĞĂƌсϮϬϭϮͲϭϯ
Ϯϯ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ
DĞĞƚŝŶŐ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ
KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚŽĨWƵďůŝĐ/ŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ;K^W/Ϳ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬƌĞƉŽƌƚĐĂƌĚ͘ŽƐƉŝ͘ŬϭϮ͘ǁĂ͘ƵƐͬƐƵŵŵĂƌLJ͘ĂƐƉdž͍LJĞĂƌсϮϬϭϮͲϭϯ
ϮϰZĞŶƚŽŶ,ŝŐŚ^ĐŚŽŽů
'ƌĂĚƵĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ
KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚŽĨWƵďůŝĐ/ŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ;K^W/Ϳ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŬϭϮ͘ǁĂ͘ƵƐͬĂƚĂĚŵŝŶͬĚĞĨĂƵůƚ͘ĂƐƉdžηĚƌŽƉŽƵƚŐƌĂĚ
Ϯϱ
ZĞŶƚŽŶ,ŝŐŚ^ĐŚŽŽů
'ƌĂĚƵĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ;ďLJ
ZĂĐĞͿ
KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ^ƵƉĞƌŝŶƚĞŶĚĞŶƚŽĨWƵďůŝĐ/ŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ;K^W/Ϳ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŬϭϮ͘ǁĂ͘ƵƐͬĂƚĂĚŵŝŶͬĚĞĨĂƵůƚ͘ĂƐƉdžηĚƌŽƉŽƵƚŐƌĂĚ
, >d,E,/>,KK s >KWD Ed
ϮϲĂƵƐĞƐŽĨĞĂƚŚWƵďůŝĐ,ĞĂůƚŚŽĨ^ĞĂƚƚůĞΘ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŬŝŶŐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀͬŚĞĂůƚŚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐͬŚĞĂůƚŚͬĚĂƚĂͬŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐ͘ĂƐƉdž
Ϯϳ
EĞŐĂƚŝǀĞ,ĞĂůƚŚZŝƐŬ
&ĂĐƚŽƌƐĂŶĚŚƌŽŶŝĐ
ŝƐĞĂƐĞ
WƵďůŝĐ,ĞĂůƚŚŽĨ^ĞĂƚƚůĞΘ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŬŝŶŐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀͬŚĞĂůƚŚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐͬŚĞĂůƚŚͬĚĂƚĂͬŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐ͘ĂƐƉdž
Ϯϴ/ŶĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞĐĐĞƐƐƚŽ
ĂƌĞ/ŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐ
WƵďůŝĐ,ĞĂůƚŚŽĨ^ĞĂƚƚůĞΘ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŬŝŶŐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀͬŚĞĂůƚŚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐͬŚĞĂůƚŚͬĚĂƚĂͬŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŽƌƐ͘ĂƐƉdž
,Kh^/E'/Es EdKZzΘ&&KZ/>/dz
ϮϵDĂƉŽƌZĞŶƚŽŶ͕^ƵŶƐĞƚ
ƌĞĂ͕ĂŶĚWƐΎŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶ;DĂƉƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚďLJ Z<ƵƐŝŶŐW^ZĚĂƚĂͿ
ϯϬ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞŽĨ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
hŶŝƚƐ
tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ^ƚĂƚĞKĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ&ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ&ŽƌĞĐĂƐƚŝŶŐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŽĨŵ͘ǁĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽƉͬĂƉƌŝůϭͬĚĞĨĂƵůƚ͘ĂƐƉηŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ϯϭdLJƉĞĂŶĚEƵŵďĞƌŽĨ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐΎ
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJƐƐĞƐƐŽƌΖƐKĨĨŝĐĞ;ZĂǁĚĂƚĂƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞĚΘĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚďLJ Z<Ϳ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁϱ͘ŬŝŶŐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀͬŐŝƐĚĂƚĂƉŽƌƚĂůͬĞĨĂƵůƚ͘ĂƐƉdž
ϯϮZĞŶƚŽŶ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐ
ďLJzĞĂƌƵŝůƚΎ
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJƐƐĞƐƐŽƌΖƐKĨĨŝĐĞ;ZĂǁĚĂƚĂƉƌŽĐĞƐƐĞĚΘĂŶĂůLJnjĞĚďLJ Z<Ϳ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁϱ͘ŬŝŶŐĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀͬŐŝƐĚĂƚĂƉŽƌƚĂůͬĞĨĂƵůƚ͘ĂƐƉdž
ϯϯ
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
EĞĞĚ/ŶĐŽŵĞ
dŚƌĞƐŚŽůĚƐ
ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŽĨ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚhƌďĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚƵĚƵƐĞƌ͘ŽƌŐͬƉŽƌƚĂůͬĚĂƚĂƐĞƚƐͬŝů͘Śƚŵů
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϯͲ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 71 of 85
June 2014
/dzK&Z EdKEͮKDDhE/dzE ^^^ ^^D Ed&KZ,hDE^ Zs/ ^E,Kh^/E'
WW E/yʹKDDhE/dzKE/d/KE^^KhZ >/^d
ϰ
ϯϰ
,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐ
ďLJWĞƌĐĞŶƚĂŐĞDĞĚŝĂŶ
/ŶĐ͘Ύ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
^Z/ĂƚĂ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂĂŶĚZĞŶƚŽŶWƌŽĨŝůĞƐ;ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ
ϯϱ
ZĞŶƚĞƌ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚ
ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐďLJ
WĞƌĐĞŶƚĂŐĞDĞĚŝĂŶ
/ŶĐ͘Ύ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϯͲ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
dĂďůĞη͗ϮϱϭϭϴͲ/ŶĐŽŵĞďLJdĞŶƵƌĞ
^Z/ĂƚĂ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂĂŶĚZĞŶƚŽŶWƌŽĨŝůĞƐ;ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ
ϯϲZĞŶƚŽŶZĞŶƚĂůhŶŝƚ
'ĂƉŶĂůLJƐŝƐΎ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗WϬϯͲ ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ
dĂďůĞη͗ϮϱϭϭϴͲ/ŶĐŽŵĞďLJdĞŶƵƌĞ
dĂďůĞη͗ϮϱϬϲϯͲ'ƌŽƐƐZĞŶƚƐ
^Z/ĂƚĂ^ƵŶƐĞƚƌĞĂĂŶĚZĞŶƚŽŶWƌŽĨŝůĞƐ;ƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨZĞŶƚŽŶͿ
ϯϳZ,^ƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĚ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐZĞŶƚŽŶ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJ;ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŽ Z<ďLJZ,Ϳ
ϯϴ
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJZĞŶƚŝŶŐ
,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐďLJ^ŝnjĞ
ĂŶĚ/ŶĐŽŵĞ
,h ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂŶĚDĂƌŬĞƚŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ;^ƉĞĐŝĂůdĂďƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨ^ĂƚĂͿ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬƉŽƌƚĂů͘ŚƵĚ͘ŐŽǀͬŚƵĚƉŽƌƚĂůͬ,h͍ƐƌĐсͬƐƚĂƚĞƐͬƐŚĂƌĞĚͬǁŽƌŬŝŶŐͬƌϰͬĞŵĂĚͬŝ
ŶĚĞdž
ϯϵƉƚ͘ZĞŶƚƐĂŶĚ
sĂĐĂŶĐLJZĂƚĞƐ
ƵƉƌĞĂŶĚ^ĐŽƚƚ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉƐ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĚƵƉƌĞƐĐŽƚƚ͘ĐŽŵͬƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐͬƉƵďůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐͬĚĞĨĂƵůƚ͘ĐĨŵ
ϰϬŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶŽĨZĞŶƚƐ
ĂŶĚWƌŝĐĞƐ
ƵƉƌĞĂŶĚ^ĐŽƚƚ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉƐ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ĚƵƉƌĞƐĐŽƚƚ͘ĐŽŵͬƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐͬƉƵďůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐͬĚĞĨĂƵůƚ͘ĐĨŵ
ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŽĨ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚhƌďĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚƵĚƵƐĞƌ͘ŽƌŐͬƉŽƌƚĂůͬĚĂƚĂƐĞƚƐͬŝů͘Śƚŵů
ϰϭ'ƌŽƐƐZĞŶƚďLJ
ĞĚƌŽŽŵ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗ϮϱϬϲϴͲĞĚƌŽŽŵƐďLJ'ƌŽƐƐZĞŶƚ
ϰϮZĞŶƚĂůhŶŝƚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞ
KǀĞƌĐƌŽǁĚĞĚ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗ϮϱϬϭϰͲdĞŶƵƌĞďLJKĐĐƵƉĂŶƚƐƉĞƌZŽŽŵ
ϰϯ
KǁŶĞƌ,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐďLJ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐEĞĞĚ
ĂƚĞŐŽƌLJ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
dĂďůĞη͗ϮϱϭϭϴͲ/ŶĐŽŵĞďLJdĞŶƵƌĞ
ϰϰ
<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJKǁŶŝŶŐ
,ŽƵƐĞŚŽůĚƐďLJ^ŝnjĞ
ĂŶĚ/ŶĐŽŵĞ
,h ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂŶĚDĂƌŬĞƚŶĂůLJƐŝƐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶ;^ƉĞĐŝĂůdĂďƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨ^ĂƚĂͿ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬƉŽƌƚĂů͘ŚƵĚ͘ŐŽǀͬŚƵĚƉŽƌƚĂůͬ,h͍ƐƌĐсͬƐƚĂƚĞƐͬƐŚĂƌĞĚͬǁŽƌŬŝŶŐͬƌϰͬĞŵĂĚͬŝ
ŶĚĞdž
ϰϱZĞŶƚŽŶDĞĚŝĂŶ,ŽŵĞ
^ĂůĞƐWƌŝĐĞ
ŝůůŽǁ͘ĐŽŵZĞĂů ƐƚĂƚĞDĂƌŬĞƚZĞƉŽƌƚƐ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘njŝůůŽǁ͘ĐŽŵͬůŽĐĂůͲŝŶĨŽͬ
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 72 of 85
June 2014
/dzK&Z EdKEͮKDDhE/dzE ^^^ ^^D Ed&KZ,hDE^ Zs/ ^E,Kh^/E'
WW E/yʹKDDhE/dzKE/d/KE^^KhZ >/^d
ϱ
ϰϲƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨ
,ŽƵƐŝŶŐƚƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJ
h͘^͘ĞŶƐƵƐŵĞƌŝĐĂŶŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ƵƌǀĞLJ
>ŝŶŬ͗ǁǁǁ͘ĨĂĐƚĨŝŶĚĞƌϮ͘ĐĞŶƐƵƐ͘ŐŽǀ
ŝůůŽǁ͘ĐŽŵZĞĂů ƐƚĂƚĞDĂƌŬĞƚZĞƉŽƌƚƐ
>ŝŶŬ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘njŝůůŽǁ͘ĐŽŵͬůŽĐĂůͲŝŶĨŽͬ
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 73 of 85
June 2014
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 74 of 85
&LW\RI5HQWRQ
&RPPXQLW\1HHGV$VVHVVPHQWIRU+XPDQ6HUYLFHVDQG+RXVLQJ
WW E/y
Z EdKEE^hE^ dZ DK'ZW,/d> ^
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 75 of 85
$XJXVW
'DWD1RWH +RXVHKROGSRSXODWLRQLQFOXGHVSHUVRQVQRWUHVLGLQJLQJURXSTXDUWHUV$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]HLVWKHKRXVHKROGSRSXODWLRQGLYLGHGE\WRWDOKRXVHKROGV3HUVRQVLQIDPLOLHV
LQFOXGHWKHKRXVHKROGHUDQGSHUVRQVUHODWHGWRWKHKRXVHKROGHUE\ELUWKPDUULDJHRUDGRSWLRQ3HU&DSLWD,QFRPHUHSUHVHQWVWKHLQFRPHUHFHLYHGE\DOOSHUVRQVDJHG\HDUVDQGRYHU
GLYLGHGE\WKHWRWDOSRSXODWLRQ
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
0HGLDQ$JH
3HU&DSLWD,QFRPH
0HGLDQ+RPH9DOXH
0HGLDQ+RXVHKROG,QFRPH
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
9DFDQW+RXVLQJ8QLWV
+RXVLQJ8QLWV
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
9DFDQW+RXVLQJ8QLWV
+RXVLQJ8QLWV
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
9DFDQW+RXVLQJ8QLWV
+RXVLQJ8QLWV
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
9DFDQW+RXVLQJ8QLWV
+RXVLQJ8QLWV
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
$QQXDO5DWH
+RXVLQJ8QLW6XPPDU\
)DPLOLHV
$YHUDJH)DPLO\6L]H
)DPLOLHV
$YHUDJH)DPLO\6L]H
)DPLOLHV
$YHUDJH)DPLO\6L]H
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]H
$QQXDO5DWH
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]H
+RXVHKROGV
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]H
+RXVHKROGV
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]H
+RXVHKROGV
+RXVHKROG6XPPDU\
+RXVHKROGV
7RWDO3RSXODWLRQ
$QQXDO5DWH
7RWDO3RSXODWLRQ
*URXS4XDUWHUV
7RWDO3RSXODWLRQ
7RWDO3RSXODWLRQ
3RSXODWLRQ6XPPDU\
5HQWRQ%GU\&('?3ODQQLQJ
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\3URILOH
2
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 76 of 85
$XJXVW
'DWD1RWH ,QFRPHUHSUHVHQWVWKHSUHFHGLQJ\HDUH[SUHVVHGLQFXUUHQWGROODUV+RXVHKROGLQFRPHLQFOXGHVZDJHDQGVDODU\HDUQLQJVLQWHUHVWGLYLGHQGVQHWUHQWVSHQVLRQV66,DQG
ZHOIDUHSD\PHQWVFKLOGVXSSRUWDQGDOLPRQ\
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
$YHUDJH+RPH9DOXH
$YHUDJH+RPH9DOXH
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWVE\9DOXH
7RWDO
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWVE\9DOXH
7RWDO
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG,QFRPH
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG,QFRPH
+RXVHKROGVE\,QFRPH
+RXVHKROG,QFRPH%DVH
+RXVHKROG,QFRPH%DVH
+RXVHKROGVE\,QFRPH
5HQWRQ%GU\&('?3ODQQLQJ
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\3URILOH
3
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 77 of 85
$XJXVW
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
3RSXODWLRQE\6H[
0DOHV
)HPDOHV
3RSXODWLRQE\6H[
0DOHV
)HPDOHV
0DOHV
)HPDOHV
3RSXODWLRQE\6H[
3RSXODWLRQE\$JH
7RWDO
3RSXODWLRQE\$JH
7RWDO
7RWDO
3RSXODWLRQE\$JH
5HQWRQ%GU\&('?3ODQQLQJ
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\3URILOH
4
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 78 of 85
$XJXVW
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
1RQLQVWLWXWLRQDOL]HG3RSXODWLRQ
'DWD1RWH 3HUVRQVRI+LVSDQLF2ULJLQPD\EHRIDQ\UDFH7KH'LYHUVLW\,QGH[PHDVXUHVWKHSUREDELOLW\WKDWWZRSHRSOHIURPWKHVDPHDUHDZLOOEHIURPGLIIHUHQWUDFHHWKQLFJURXSV
,Q*URXS4XDUWHUV
,QVWLWXWLRQDOL]HG3RSXODWLRQ
1RQUHODWLYH
,Q1RQIDPLO\+RXVHKROGV
&KLOG
2WKHUUHODWLYH
+RXVHKROGHU
6SRXVH
,Q+RXVHKROGV
,Q)DPLO\+RXVHKROGV
'LYHUVLW\,QGH[
3RSXODWLRQE\5HODWLRQVKLSDQG+RXVHKROG7\SH
7RWDO
7ZRRU0RUH5DFHV
+LVSDQLF2ULJLQ
3DFLILF,VODQGHU$ORQH
6RPH2WKHU5DFH$ORQH
$PHULFDQ,QGLDQ$ORQH
$VLDQ$ORQH
:KLWH$ORQH
%ODFN$ORQH
'LYHUVLW\,QGH[
3RSXODWLRQE\5DFH(WKQLFLW\
7RWDO
7ZRRU0RUH5DFHV
+LVSDQLF2ULJLQ
3DFLILF,VODQGHU$ORQH
6RPH2WKHU5DFH$ORQH
$PHULFDQ,QGLDQ$ORQH
$VLDQ$ORQH
:KLWH$ORQH
%ODFN$ORQH
'LYHUVLW\,QGH[
3RSXODWLRQE\5DFH(WKQLFLW\
7RWDO
7ZRRU0RUH5DFHV
+LVSDQLF2ULJLQ
3DFLILF,VODQGHU$ORQH
6RPH2WKHU5DFH$ORQH
$PHULFDQ,QGLDQ$ORQH
$VLDQ$ORQH
:KLWH$ORQH
%ODFN$ORQH
3RSXODWLRQE\5DFH(WKQLFLW\
7RWDO
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\3URILOH
5HQWRQ%GU\&('?3ODQQLQJ
5
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 79 of 85
$XJXVW
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG
'DWD1RWH +RXVHKROGVZLWKFKLOGUHQLQFOXGHDQ\KRXVHKROGVZLWKSHRSOHXQGHUDJHUHODWHGRUQRW0XOWLJHQHUDWLRQDOKRXVHKROGVDUHIDPLOLHVZLWKRUPRUHSDUHQWFKLOGUHODWLRQVKLSV
8QPDUULHGSDUWQHUKRXVHKROGVDUHXVXDOO\FODVVLILHGDVQRQIDPLO\KRXVHKROGVXQOHVVWKHUHLVDQRWKHUPHPEHURIWKHKRXVHKROGUHODWHGWRWKHKRXVHKROGHU0XOWLJHQHUDWLRQDODQGXQPDUULHG
SDUWQHUKRXVHKROGVDUHUHSRUWHGRQO\WRWKHWUDFWOHYHO(VULHVWLPDWHGEORFNJURXSGDWDZKLFKLVXVHGWRHVWLPDWHSRO\JRQVRUQRQVWDQGDUGJHRJUDSK\
2ZQHGZLWKD0RUWJDJH/RDQ
2ZQHG)UHHDQG&OHDU
+RXVHKROGVE\7HQXUHDQG0RUWJDJH6WDWXV
7RWDO
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
+RXVHKROGVE\6L]H
7RWDO
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
0DOHIHPDOH
6DPHVH[
0XOWLJHQHUDWLRQDO+RXVHKROGV
8QPDUULHG3DUWQHU+RXVHKROGV
$OO+RXVHKROGVZLWK&KLOGUHQ
1RQIDPLO\+RXVHKROGV
2WKHU)DPLO\ZLWK)HPDOH+RXVHKROGHU
:LWK5HODWHG&KLOGUHQ
2WKHU)DPLO\ZLWK0DOH+RXVHKROGHU
:LWK5HODWHG&KLOGUHQ
:LWK5HODWHG&KLOGUHQ
2WKHU)DPLO\ 1R6SRXVH3UHVHQW
)DPLO\+RXVHKROGV
+XVEDQGZLIH)DPLOLHV
+RXVHKROGVZLWK3HUVRQ
+RXVHKROGVZLWK3HRSOH
+RXVHKROGVE\7\SH
7RWDO
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\3URILOH
5HQWRQ%GU\&('?3ODQQLQJ
6
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 80 of 85
-XQH
'DWD1RWH +RXVHKROGSRSXODWLRQLQFOXGHVSHUVRQVQRWUHVLGLQJLQJURXSTXDUWHUV$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]HLVWKHKRXVHKROGSRSXODWLRQGLYLGHGE\WRWDOKRXVHKROGV3HUVRQVLQIDPLOLHV
LQFOXGHWKHKRXVHKROGHUDQGSHUVRQVUHODWHGWRWKHKRXVHKROGHUE\ELUWKPDUULDJHRUDGRSWLRQ3HU&DSLWD,QFRPHUHSUHVHQWVWKHLQFRPHUHFHLYHGE\DOOSHUVRQVDJHG\HDUVDQGRYHU
GLYLGHGE\WKHWRWDOSRSXODWLRQ
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
3HU&DSLWD,QFRPH
0HGLDQ$JH
0HGLDQ+RPH9DOXH
9DFDQW+RXVLQJ8QLWV
0HGLDQ+RXVHKROG,QFRPH
+RXVLQJ8QLWV
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
9DFDQW+RXVLQJ8QLWV
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
9DFDQW+RXVLQJ8QLWV
+RXVLQJ8QLWV
9DFDQW+RXVLQJ8QLWV
+RXVLQJ8QLWV
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
+RXVLQJ8QLWV
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWV
$YHUDJH)DPLO\6L]H
$QQXDO5DWH
+RXVLQJ8QLW6XPPDU\
)DPLOLHV
$YHUDJH)DPLO\6L]H
)DPLOLHV
$QQXDO5DWH
)DPLOLHV
$YHUDJH)DPLO\6L]H
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]H
+RXVHKROGV
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]H
+RXVHKROGV
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]H
+RXVHKROGV
+RXVHKROG6XPPDU\
+RXVHKROGV
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG6L]H
*URXS4XDUWHUV
7RWDO3RSXODWLRQ
$QQXDO5DWH
7RWDO3RSXODWLRQ
7RWDO3RSXODWLRQ
7RWDO3RSXODWLRQ
$UHD 6TXDUHPLOHV
3RSXODWLRQ6XPPDU\
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\
6XQVHW$UHD &('?3ODQQLQJ
7
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 81 of 85
-XQH
'DWD1RWH ,QFRPHUHSUHVHQWVWKHSUHFHGLQJ\HDUH[SUHVVHGLQFXUUHQWGROODUV+RXVHKROGLQFRPHLQFOXGHVZDJHDQGVDODU\HDUQLQJVLQWHUHVWGLYLGHQGVQHWUHQWVSHQVLRQV66,DQG
ZHOIDUHSD\PHQWVFKLOGVXSSRUWDQGDOLPRQ\
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
$YHUDJH+RPH9DOXH
$YHUDJH+RPH9DOXH
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWVE\9DOXH
7RWDO
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG,QFRPH
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG+RXVLQJ8QLWVE\9DOXH
7RWDO
$YHUDJH+RXVHKROG,QFRPH
+RXVHKROGVE\,QFRPH
+RXVHKROG,QFRPH%DVH
+RXVHKROG,QFRPH%DVH
$UHD 6TXDUHPLOHV
+RXVHKROGVE\,QFRPH
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\
6XQVHW$UHD &('?3ODQQLQJ
8
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 82 of 85
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
-XQH
0DOHV
)HPDOHV
3RSXODWLRQE\6H[
0DOHV
)HPDOHV
3RSXODWLRQE\6H[
3RSXODWLRQE\6H[
0DOHV
)HPDOHV
3RSXODWLRQE\$JH
7RWDO
3RSXODWLRQE\$JH
7RWDO
7RWDO
$UHD 6TXDUHPLOHV
3RSXODWLRQE\$JH
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\
6XQVHW$UHD &('?3ODQQLQJ
9
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 83 of 85
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
-XQH
,QVWLWXWLRQDOL]HG3RSXODWLRQ
1RQLQVWLWXWLRQDOL]HG3RSXODWLRQ
'DWD1RWH 3HUVRQVRI+LVSDQLF2ULJLQPD\EHRIDQ\UDFH7KH'LYHUVLW\,QGH[PHDVXUHVWKHSUREDELOLW\WKDWWZRSHRSOHIURPWKHVDPHDUHDZLOOEHIURPGLIIHUHQWUDFHHWKQLFJURXSV
1RQUHODWLYH
,Q1RQIDPLO\+RXVHKROGV
,Q*URXS4XDUWHUV
6SRXVH
&KLOG
2WKHUUHODWLYH
,Q+RXVHKROGV
,Q)DPLO\+RXVHKROGV
+RXVHKROGHU
+LVSDQLF2ULJLQ
'LYHUVLW\,QGH[
3RSXODWLRQE\5HODWLRQVKLSDQG+RXVHKROG7\SH
7RWDO
3DFLILF,VODQGHU$ORQH
6RPH2WKHU5DFH$ORQH
7ZRRU0RUH5DFHV
%ODFN$ORQH
$PHULFDQ,QGLDQ$ORQH
$VLDQ$ORQH
'LYHUVLW\,QGH[
3RSXODWLRQE\5DFH(WKQLFLW\
7RWDO
:KLWH$ORQH
6RPH2WKHU5DFH$ORQH
7ZRRU0RUH5DFHV
+LVSDQLF2ULJLQ
$PHULFDQ,QGLDQ$ORQH
$VLDQ$ORQH
3DFLILF,VODQGHU$ORQH
3RSXODWLRQE\5DFH(WKQLFLW\
7RWDO
:KLWH$ORQH
%ODFN$ORQH
7ZRRU0RUH5DFHV
+LVSDQLF2ULJLQ
'LYHUVLW\,QGH[
$VLDQ$ORQH
3DFLILF,VODQGHU$ORQH
6RPH2WKHU5DFH$ORQH
:KLWH$ORQH
%ODFN$ORQH
$PHULFDQ,QGLDQ$ORQH
3RSXODWLRQE\5DFH(WKQLFLW\
7RWDO
6XQVHW$UHD &('?3ODQQLQJ
$UHD 6TXDUHPLOHV
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\
10
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 84 of 85
6RXUFH 86&HQVXV%XUHDX&HQVXV6XPPDU\)LOH(VULIRUHFDVWVIRUDQG(VULFRQYHUWHG&HQVXVGDWDLQWRJHRJUDSK\
-XQH
2ZQHG)UHHDQG&OHDU
5HQWHU2FFXSLHG
'DWD1RWH +RXVHKROGVZLWKFKLOGUHQLQFOXGHDQ\KRXVHKROGVZLWKSHRSOHXQGHUDJHUHODWHGRUQRW0XOWLJHQHUDWLRQDOKRXVHKROGVDUHIDPLOLHVZLWKRUPRUHSDUHQWFKLOGUHODWLRQVKLSV
8QPDUULHGSDUWQHUKRXVHKROGVDUHXVXDOO\FODVVLILHGDVQRQIDPLO\KRXVHKROGVXQOHVVWKHUHLVDQRWKHUPHPEHURIWKHKRXVHKROGUHODWHGWRWKHKRXVHKROGHU0XOWLJHQHUDWLRQDODQGXQPDUULHG
SDUWQHUKRXVHKROGVDUHUHSRUWHGRQO\WRWKHWUDFWOHYHO(VULHVWLPDWHGEORFNJURXSGDWDZKLFKLVXVHGWRHVWLPDWHSRO\JRQVRUQRQVWDQGDUGJHRJUDSK\
+RXVHKROGVE\7HQXUHDQG0RUWJDJH6WDWXV
7RWDO
2ZQHU2FFXSLHG
2ZQHGZLWKD0RUWJDJH/RDQ
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
6DPHVH[
+RXVHKROGVE\6L]H
7RWDO
3HUVRQ+RXVHKROG
0XOWLJHQHUDWLRQDO+RXVHKROGV
8QPDUULHG3DUWQHU+RXVHKROGV
0DOHIHPDOH
$OO+RXVHKROGVZLWK&KLOGUHQ
2WKHU)DPLO\ZLWK)HPDOH+RXVHKROGHU
:LWK5HODWHG&KLOGUHQ
1RQIDPLO\+RXVHKROGV
2WKHU)DPLO\ 1R6SRXVH3UHVHQW
2WKHU)DPLO\ZLWK0DOH+RXVHKROGHU
:LWK5HODWHG&KLOGUHQ
)DPLO\+RXVHKROGV
+XVEDQGZLIH)DPLOLHV
:LWK5HODWHG&KLOGUHQ
7RWDO
+RXVHKROGVZLWK3HUVRQ
+RXVHKROGVZLWK3HRSOH
$UHD 6TXDUHPLOHV
+RXVHKROGVE\7\SH
'HPRJUDSKLF6XPPDU\
6XQVHW$UHD &('?3ODQQLQJ
11
Kaya Strategik Exhibit A - Attachment 1
Page 85 of 85
6/21/23, 8:16 AMFINAL CAPAA Community Demography (ACS 2020)https://www.canva.com/design/DAFVPLsByyU/Q4usT-C2_0kDvk66BDh0Mw/view?utm_content=DAFVPLsByyU&utm_campaign=designshare&utm_medium=link&utm_source=homepage_design_men…1/1WASHINGTON STATE COMMISSIONON ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN AFFAIRSASIAN, NATIVE HAWAIIAN, AND PACIFIC ISLANDERCOMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHY2020 CENSUS AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEYPREPARED BY KAYA STRATEGIK, LLCKaya Strategik_Exhibit A Attachment 2Page 1 of 1