Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA87-008
~ 11111 Entrance to Mount • d" k Olivet Cemetary from * ; N.E. 3rd Street. '` _ .. ..., iice_...... ..-:.:' -....,%.„::‘,.---::. - 't ''''''''':'''' ' '' kirpoir,- c i ` r• s .4,71,,it'it <^ '` 00 Looking north from site y ;- .,,,e; :1;., •,.,‘'.«14.4 , to potential emergency 4 :.r• f"-•11 ,a...`#„ -•' • access to site and } ' ~ 1 1. • • ` -• Monterey Terrace `' • , f . �i_' " _ ` Residential Community. ' '� • .mot. .� -74 ` 'yam,` •rs. , - ♦. .. u.. W 11111t'� - -.. ter._? A- Looking west toward Olympic Mountains and Lake Washington from Monterey Terrace Residential Community just before entering the site. Illiiii;- iiilirt-=.- 4M* ..iiiiimt-ii..gfr ---" ' I. Looking east across the `' site from potential emergency access '� ' entrance at the north property line. arfmilliilillik Looking south across 4 the site. 4 if ,ram - ": . . .. f -.••.av 7 y�'•ter. , .!+ • - - _•.,... ` • • Looking south from the '" ' edge of the bank on- .site. i ` firr < • "• , 4614-1f;•,-', .4. 1.1., 7 ,u .. . • 4.1491 '• ;I• • Truck entrance to site .4'. * - from N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue. 1• Mr • DO IpT FIRER ••• t- •s w•J{.•AT• • • Looking north across ? :s . N.E. 3rd Street. "- ,.� . •k r s F • N.E. 3rd Street and Edmonds Avenue inter- t; section. • 1 vrL -.11111 ��(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEMTIAL)J��/1 0 S - MT-OLIVET CEYETARY �; Q or, �� OWgo ✓illy - - 0, ,:x n .,.a.. - 1, - '�•... ��/ ,: � w. ,, > 1 i � Site � � Jill '.bd, ��. • Aptl'Z F.a � 1 �a►.�'1��"3 ,p - Ti.; w `I ' '- `v .,.. e�''' \� L••�,J �. N ® e 4ti 7 s —am L• • � I �M\ A _(ri., tl - II/ RExrox�:: uPi 2 Em qA �':Vm3 +gyp g 3 1-- Tsr'.4. . a .I,• r� 414��.,� `�, �;^ �T I _....,.. I ...v( 1�, '��.e. \tL• �0 �C%la 7� 1 9.. I: r ••'` I v I) ur1' �7 `` I. VICINITY MAP a t W • 41*.* ' : I. . ,:111111 111 \ por ,, •b•� v.,.\ raj• `, , F aIP �-�llii .,ib� 1, aGG .. -- 4001. ,? I i .. I -44 , f'.1 N ititi. mN STONEWAT GRAVEL,nb CEMENT r f .. I® IO F � •--De', c' Lie'" .Iy Y��. • •'•��,1` /' o a `• _ s" O 1 F •' • 3. 9 In'r'4 , is / / "N c„, 03 ,.. „,. ._. �xe I7N . 'PA- - el 4. n • e.y' eiwF�� I�ip. i �g �/� r ,'• 4" P.1 it K �, `b L MCMehon Property _ I I li d ,R a a (GRAVEL PIT) _ •lI. %O BELT \3-E N0 r I-- r. sirs u,. ,, Z ., )''". L ` O N -� eAsm ru ar=b=i.c: vxns s y� ,r., G • - •I `I.A '� u I 1. Ss=Ge¢T (=b.b Aen,S� '.U"' C '�' :,• y Ca N I j . Su mSTs esnroseo �,x 1 A,b ', • ox GN=ra s rmu ( \, 1 Q i =m 4"sP2xms rma Bq TBB, -.. _ ,i1 0 O,, %, APARTMENT, = f 06SB _t Future Connection to SR 189 '-••Im [ I rmxmu 561012 'EA, IV, ifs I 1� m O avr __ \6 RETAIL ,Er ror.r=x.x,Gm— ssas riffs°. "mbai px..r=v.. T S /gyp o I, 'I 4C E ilk =SOESS FEET C to CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 100L117 9 R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. Planning • Landscape • Environmental • Economics Principal: P Robert W. Thorpe, AICP Q P �F� •- Associates: April 16, 1991 ZS" (99\ Jeff Buckland Stephen Speidel, ASLA Donald K. Erickson, AICP Jennifer Tubb City of Renton Planning Department Len Zickler, ASLA 200 Mill Avenue Southtgu Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Monterey Terrace EIS (RWT/A #270391) Dear Mr. Erickson: h nkt your your letter f March 29 r�!gnrdin the Montorcy T R (City a for L•# r•e1� �� ...y.....,,...y a tv��aa..�i� a GrICaVV ��GLVIIG of Renton File No. R-008-87) and the need for supplemental environmental information on this project. As you are aware, R.W. Thorpe and Associates, Inc. prepared a working draft EIS on the project in May 1988. Since work was stopped on the project that year, this draft was not submitted to ' the City of Renton for review. Although the present project design has changed from that considered previously, multifamiuly residential development of the property is still proposed. A number of changes would be required to complete the 1988 draft, particularly regarding elements of the Built Environment. A traffic study was never completed for the last draft and would also be required. What follows are elements of the environment scoped in the 1988 draft: Natural Environment A. Earth 1. .Geology and Soils 2. Topography 3. Erosion B. Water Aquifer/Groundwater C. Plants Built Environment A. Population B. Land Use Relationship to Plans and Policies • C. Public Services 1. Fire 2. Police 3. Water Supply 4. Sewer 5. Library/Schools 6. Parks and Recreation D. Transportation Alternatives 1. No Action 2. Development for Single Family Residential Use 3. Development at 80% of the Proposal Density Seattle: 1 300 Alaska Bldg. • 61 8 Second Avenue • Seattle,WA 98104 • (206)624-6239 • Fax(206)625-0930 Seattle • Spokane • Anchorage • Denver 1 If additional elements are to be scoped at this time, they should be identified prior to preparation of the cost estimate for the current DEIS. Similarly, if new or different alternatives are to be considered, these too should be identified at this time so that site plans for any development alternatives can be prepared, and their costs added to the present DEIS estimate. Our firm has updated its computer capabilities since the previous draft was prepared, and some additional word processing, or disk conversion, time will be required to transfer existing information into the new system. Subconsultants for the elements that R. W. Thorpe and Associates will not analyze need to be identified. The City will be notified of these subconsultants and can arrange to incorporate them into the new contractual agreement being prepared for this project. We would be responsible for coordinating with subconsultants on information required for the current DEIS. In summary, preparation of the present EIS and the costs associated with this work will be based on identification of tasks needed to complete the w/DEIS and any new elements and alternatives required. We will attempt to incorporate existing information wherever possible. Based on our familiarity with the previous project, and subsequent proposals on the site, it is expected that some economy in preparation of the new EIS can be achieved. With respect to contractual arrangements, it is proposed that the previous contract be honored as valid and simply transferred from ERADCO to Gary Merlino. The new cost estimate would probably be considered a supplement to this contract, as the former amount will likely be exceeded in the new estimate. As soon as clarification on the elements and alternatives discussed above is received from the City, R. W. Thorpe and Associates will prepare a cost estimate and timeline for the DEIS preparation. Upon approval of the new estimate, we will begin work on this project and coordinate with project subconsultants to do the same. I will be contacting you to discuss scoping elements in order to expedite proceeding with this project. Sincerely R.W. Thorpe and Associates, Inc. Je Buckland Environmental Planner Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 98104•(206]624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503•1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage,AK 99501 •(907]276-0005 R W.Tho pe SAsspc1etee HALINEN & ASSOCIATES-' Attorneys at Law DAVID L.HALINEN,P.E. Bellevue Place/MGM Building (206)454-8272 RHYS A.STERLING,P.E. 800 Bellevue Way NE,Suite 376 FAx(206)646-2851 W.THEODORE VANDER WEL Bellevue,Washington 98004 April 2 , 1991 PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF RENTON VIA TELECOPIER (235-2513) APR - 3199 Mr. Donald Erickson RL = City of Renton Zoning Administrator ��:�-� 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Monterey Terrace Rezone Your File No. R-008-87 Dear Mr. Erickson: I still have not received a written reply to my letters to you dated March 26, 1991 and March 28, 1991. I need a response today. Would you please accommodate? Sincerely, HALINEN & ASSOCIATES r avid L. Halinen DLH:rkd cc: Mr. Gary M. Merlino AnMarCo S HALINEN & ASSOCIATES Attorneys at Law DAVID L.HALINEN,P.E. Bellevue Place/MGM Building (206)454-8272 RHYS A.STERLING,P.E. 800 Bellevue Way NE,Suite 376 FAX(206)646-2851 W.THEODORE VANDER WEL Bellevue,Washington 98004 March 28, 1991 PLANNING DIVISION VIA TELECOPIER AND CERTIFIED MAIL CITY OF REN T ON RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED APR - 1 1991 Mr. Donald K. Erickson RECEIVED City of Renton Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Monterey Terrace Rezone Your File No. R-008-87 Dear Mr. Erickson: Thank you for meeting with me, Gary Merlino and Rob Hines this morning concerning the Monterey Terrace Rezone. Based upon our discussion, I understand that (1) you have reviewed my March 1991 letter to you, (2) you will assign to one of your staff members the task of reviewing the subject rezone file, and (3) unless you find either written correspondence from ERADCO withdrawing the rezone or written correspondence to ERADCO insisting that it be withdrawn, the City will deem the subject rezone file to still be open and AnMarCo shall be entitled to . continue as rezone applicant in place of ERADCO. As I explained to you this morning, it is critical that I hear from you regarding this matter immediately. Presuming (as I believe to be the case) that your file contains no such correspondence, we want to make immediate arrangements with the City for the SEIS to be completed. I look forward to your faxed reply. Sincerely, LINEN & ASSOCIATES e‘- '(‘°-CLIt12 David L. alinen DLH:dlg cc: Mr. Gary M. Merlino (via telecopier) AnMarCo HALINEN & ASSOCIATES Attorneys at Law DAVID L.HALINEN,P.E. Bellevue Place/MGM Building (206)454-8272 RHYS A.STERLING,P.E. 800 Bellevue Way NE,Suite 376 FAx(206)646-2851 W.THEODORE VANDER WEL Bellevue,Washington 98004 March 26, 1991 PLANNING DIVISION HAND-DELIVERED CITY OF RENTON Mr. Donald Erickson MAR 2 6 /991 City of Renton Zoning Administrator 200 Mill Avenue RECEIVE* Renton, Washington 98055 Re: Monterey Terrace Rezone Your File No. R-008-87 Dear Mr. Erickson: I represent AnMarCo with respect to the above-referenced matter. As you know, over the last several years my client has been involved in litigation with ERADCO concerning the ownership of the Monterey Terrace parcel. The courts have recently awarded title to that parcel of land to my client. Accordingly, my client wishes to have the City resume processing of the rezone application that ERADCO most recently filed. Robert W. Thorpe has recently advised me of the status of the City's rezone application processing, including the status of the supplemental EIS preparation. (See the enclosed copy of the letter to me from Mr. Thorpe dated March 26, 1991. ) Mr. Thorpe has advised me that the rezone application is still active and that much of the EIS has been completed. AnMarCo wishes to have it fully completed as soon as possible. Thus, on AnMarCo's behalf, I hereby request that you (along with those other City staff members who should be involved as well) meet with me, other AnMarCo representatives, and Mr. Thorpe as soon as possible to discuss the remaining work that needs to be done on the SEIS so that AnMarCo can make the necessary remaining deposits with the City for completion of the SEIS and so that the SEIS can be promptly completed. In view of the fact that the Renton Planning Commission has requested that the City Council establish a moratorium on receipt and processing of new rezone applications and because that moratorium may go to a vote of the Council as early as Monday, April 1, 1991, I must request your immediate written acknowledgement that ERADCO never withdrew the subject rezone application and that the City has not acted to terminate the rezone application. Mr. Donald Erickson City of Renton Zoning Administrator March 26, 1991 Page 2 Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your immediate reply letter and a proposed time in the near future for the requested meeting. Sincerely, HALINEN & ASSOCIATES CD-z David L. alinen DLH:rkd Enclosure cc: Mr. Gary M. Merlino AnMarCo (w/encl. ) Mr. Robert W. Thorpe R.W. Thorpe & Assoc. MAR 26 '91 15:18 RW TY^RPE2066250930 P.2 /• • I �o R.mMM�/�� g Thorpe �i.EQ'S'iSoCmen�Bte$al • o^;rt'>ticsI ■ ruk Principals FloberC W. Thorpe, A1CP • March 26, 1991 Jeff euc efff Eiu4kIend Stephen Speidel. ASLA • Jennifer Tubb Len Zickler. ASLA Dave Halinen, 4ttorney 800 Bellevue Wad N.E., Suite 319 Bellevue, Washi tgton 98004 FAX: 646-2851 RE: Monterey;Terrace Rezone Application I Renton Environmental Impact Statement Preparation - Status Dear Dave: • • Per our meetinglof Friday, March 22, 1991, I am faxing to you this letter concerning our understandi>!tg of the status of the Monterey Terrace Rezone Application for a 41 acre site located 1 in the City of Renton. As you are aware this application was filed on the subject' property by ERADCO. The City required a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to the one prepared in 1981 for the Rezone and PUD on this property. The 1981 Rezone and PUD was approved on the subject property,however ERADCO allowed it to elapse in that the proponents did not start the project within a period of three years. As I understand)it, your client, Am Mar Co, has been adjudicated to be the rightful owner of the pr'perty and wishes to have the City of Renton resume processing of the existing rezone application and finalize SEPA processing. As I stated to you, our discussions with the City indicate that this is still an active Rezone Application and that no notification by the City to withdraw the application has been received to date. The EIS developed for the project was approximately 80% complete for the scoped items that our firm and other subs had responsibility for with the exception of the traffic report doe by TP&E, which was approximately 20% complete. This was held up area-wide foil over a year due to delays and the CH2M Hill Study prepared for the Cemetery Hill Transportation and Circulation study. Seattle: 130OAlae+ke erg. • 616 Second Avenue • Seattle,WA 98104 • (2063 624.0259 • Fax(206)626-0930 • 1 Seattle • Spokane • Anchorage • Oenver. • MAR 26 ' 91 14: 29 6250920 PAGE. 002 MAR 26 '91 15:18 RN Tur'.4PE2066250930 P.3 • Dave Halinen 03/26/91 Page 2 of 2 Following ERAI CO's August 4, 1989 letter to Renton Zoning Administrator, Donald K. Erickson (copy enclosed), I have had discussions from time to time with Mr. Erickson conFerning the status of the project. On those occasions we asked him to keep the appli fation open. If I can provide you with any other information, please advise me. Sincerely, R.W Thorpe & ssociates, Inc. /I-/ o rt W. orp , AI P Enclosure RWT/sas • Si,.tr 4„ I.^�OCS iala�fca 2ld9.•2nd E.Cherry•S.8 tie.WA 90104-cZeC76]b1=4.622t3 Ancharo c; arc 543•1110 Wass 51xyh Avrxac-Anchoro9c,AK 69501 •C2073 278-000.7 .•w •-. MAR 26 ' 91 14:29 6250920 PAGE. 003 ERADCO •Real Estate• Investments•Securities•Development i ... ....' ;Ty r August 4, 1989 AU(G 71989 , r ' Donald K. Erickson �� �f �" `-', Zoning Administrator, Building Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Monterey Terrace Associates Rezone Application Dear Mr. Erickson: Janette McKague of your office advised me several weeks ago of a need to have Bob Thorpe inform you in writing of the above named partnership's wish to complete the pending rezone of their property adjacent to Mt. Olivet Cemetery. My visit with Ms. McKague was prompted by ERADCO's Pat Easter who requested the undersigned determine the progress of the East Renton Transportation Benefit Study. John Adamson has advised me that the study should be completed by September or October of this year. However there appears to be concern that Centron's problems may delay final revisionary work by CH2M Hill. The various matters effecting completion of the supplemental E.I.S. were discussed in detail with Bob Thorpe and Pat Easter two weeks ago and further inquiries were made with Centron's engineers and others. Bob Thorpe advises that finalization of the transportation study is necessary before we can complete the traffic study which is a necessary element of the E.I.S. and ultimate rezone approval. Mr. Easter wishes the undersigned to advise you of our definite wish to proceed with the supplemental E.I.S. at the earliest date such a move will effectuate finalization of same. Formal pursuit of this matter will continue to be handled by Bob Thorpe's office. If you wish further explanation or inquiry please advise. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION' LLA4/(44/6._ Gc- _ Moksha Smith Land Management mm cc: Bob Thorpe 18000 Pacific Highway South, Suite 1115, Seattle, Washington 98188 (206) 244-0080 ERADCO •Real Estate• Investments•Securities•Development r q CITY OT August 4, 1989 7 1989 Donald K. Erickson u v J Zoning Administrator, Building Department 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Monterey Terrace Associates Rezone Application Dear Mr. Erickson: Janette McKague of your office advised me several weeks ago of a need to have Bob Thorpe inform you in writing of the above named partnership's wish to complete the pending rezone of their property adjacent to Mt. Olivet Cemetery. My visit with Ms. McKague was prompted by ERADCO's Pat Easter who requested the undersigned determine the progress of the East Renton Transportation Benefit Study. John Adamson has advised me that the study should be completed by September or October of this year. However there appears to be concern that Centron's problems may delay final revisionary work by CH2M Hill. The various matters effecting completion of the supplemental E.I.S. were discussed in detail with Bob Thorpe and Pat Easter two weeks ago and further inquiries were made with Centron's engineers and others. Bob Thorpe advises that finalization of the transportation study is necessary before we can complete the traffic study which is a necessary element of the E.I.S. and ultimate rezone approval. Mr. Easter wishes the undersigned to advise you of our definite wish to proceed with the supplemental E.I.S. at the earliest date such a move will effectuate finalization of same. Formal pursuit of this matter will continue to be handled by Bob Thorpe's office. If you wish further explanation or inquiry please advise. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Moksha Smith Land Management mm cc: Bob Thorpe 18000 Pacific Highway South, Suite 1115, Seattle, Washington 98188 (206) 244-0080 4'o 0 CITY OF RENTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM DATE: November 17, 1988 TO: Environmental Review Committee Members: Larry Springer, Planning Division Manager Ron Nelson, Building Division Manager Ken Nyberg, Acting Public Works Director FROM: Don Erickson, Zoning Administrato SUBJECT: Environmental Impact Statements Status Update. Below is a status report on the various EIS' , Supplemental EIS ' and related projects the City of Renton has before it. As you can see there are currently potentially eight (8) EIS related projects before us or currently underway. Two of these have basically been completed and are now in the comment and response phase. These two are the Lexington Ridge DEIS and the Eastside' Watershed Project Final EIS Adequacy Determination Study. 1. Orillia Retail Center Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezone (John Adamson, Project Coordinator) The Draft EIS, prepared by the consultants, Shapiro and Associates, Inc. was issued in April of this year. Comments were due on May 18 and the estimated date of the final action by the lead agency was July 25, 1988. In response to the extensive comments by the representatives of South Center Shopping Center and others who information the adequacy of the DEIS, sup- plemental is being prepared by the City and consultants to respond to these concerns. This information focuses• on wetlands, traffic, and economic impacts. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 Environmental _Lmpact Study Status Updat November 17 , 1988 Page 2 The revised Draft EIS for this project is expected to be out in draft form by early December and will be ready for re-issuance during mid to late December. The project would then go through another 30 day comment period with the date of the final action by the lead agency, i. e. ,the issuance of the Final EIS, occuring sometime around the end of January or in early February. 2 . Lexington Ridge Apartments (Don Erickson, Project Manager) The contract for this project was signed on May 11, 1988 and authorization for the consultants to proceed was made in May of this year. The Preliminary Draft EIS was submitted to the City in June and the Draft EIS was issued, after undergoing revisions, on November 2 , 1988 . The project is currently in the public comment and review period which ends on December 2nd. 3 . McMahon/Edwards Estate (Don Erickson, Project Manager) The consultants for this EIS were selected in early April of this year. The firm selected was CH2M Hill since they had done much of the previous work on the applicant' s expanded checklist that accompanied their earlier rezone request. The draft contract for Con- sultant Services went through a number of permutations before being signed in September of this year. As of this date the City still has not received the applicant' s check for $71, 000 to cover the consultant ' s time in preparing and staff ' s in reviewing the subject document. Typically, work is not authorized by us to begin until such time that the applicant's check has been deposited with the Finance Department and cleared the bank. NOTE: Based on phone conversations with the consultant, CH2M Hill, there remains some question as to how soon this money will be forthcoming since the applicant is, apparently, in arrears on some of the initial background work already undertaken by them. f . ERADCOJMonterey Terrace Supplemental EIS (Don Erickson, Project Manager) In mid-April of this year the consultant, Robert Thorpe & Associates, submitted their rough draft for the Monterey Terrace Supplemental EIS. A revised working Environmenta mpact Study Status Updat( November 17 , 1988 Page 3 draft of the SEIS was submitted by the applicant in mid-May even though a contract had not been signed or money for the consultant' s and City staffs' time having been deposited with the City. During June and July, revisions to the consultant contract were made including a more specific proposal for the transpor- tation element, which had been a concern of the Public Works Department. In August I wrote the applicant' s representative, Bob Thorpe, that the contract had been approved as to form by the City Attorney on July 20, 1988 and, other than minor revisions to the time schedule, noted that we were ready to sign the contract. Two copies of the contract signed by me and approved as to form by the City Attorney were submitted to Mr. Thorpe at this time for signature with a request that if there were any questions I be notified immediately. In a phone conversation with Jeanette Samek-McKague on August 19 , 1988 , Mr. Thorpe indicated that he was awaiting ERADCO' s depositing the estimated $20, 000 for the consultant' s services and City staff reviewing time. I again wrote Mr. Thorpe on October 27 , 1988 and asked him to "please let me know the status of the contract as we would like to keep the file record up to date and project moving forward" . Again there has been no response from Mr. Thorpe. 5. PACCAR/Kenworth Trucking EIS (Rebecca Lind, Project Manager) After beginning in June and following an expedited consultant selection process, this project has proceeded with the consultants, the NBBJ Group, doing background work during the interim and refining the Scope of Work. On October 5, 1988 the signed contract between the City and EIS consultant was transmitted to PACCAR with a request for $53 , 450 to cover consultant services and City review time. This money has now been deposited with the City. The timetable for the EIS has, however, slipped because PACCAR has only recently selected the design engineering firm for their new Kenworth Trucking plant. As a consequence, the preliminary Draft EIS is not expected to be out until February of next year. 6. Eastside Watershed Project EIS (Don Erickson, Project Manager) The contract with the consultants, Jones & Stokes, Associates, was signed in September, and the first draft of the report was submitted at about the same Environmental .Lmpact Study Status Updatc November 17, 1988 Page 4 time. Because of the relatively small amount of money for the contract the consultants had proceeded on their own. The final draft of the Adequacy Determination of the 1979 FEIS for the Eastside Watershed Project was submitted on November 1, 1988 and has been submitted to all ERC members as well as relevant staff. On November 9�, 1988 the ERC accepted the recommendations of the report and passed a motion to "commence the procedure to develop the supplemental EIS" . Efforts are currently under to begin scoping out alternatives to be considered in a Supplemental EIS for this project as well as to identify funding sources for it. 7. King County Department of Public Works Site Rezone (Don Erickson, Project Manager) The County Public Works Department has decided to do an EIS for a rezone of their holdings on their N.E. 4th and Monroe Avenue N.E. site, sans the City's holdings, those of other King County departments, and that portion of the site which previously would have housed their consolidated offices (+/- 85, 000 sq. ft. ) . They have asked the ERC to issue a Determination of Significance so that scoping for this project can begin immediately. Discussions are underway with the applicants as to whether the EIS could be done in-house by the County, or will be done privately by consultants selected by the City with the County's concurrence. 8. Blackriver Corporate Park Request for Site Plan . Approval and Substantial Shoreline Development Permits for Buildings 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 , 23, and 24. (Don Erickson, Project Manager) First City Development Corporation has applied for permits to allow the construction of approximately 597 , 298 sq. ft. of office development in three 3-story. buildings, one 4-story building, two 5-story buildings. A 3-level parking structure would serve Buildings 21, 22 and 23 . Since the proposed development encompasses most of the site including wetlands identified by both DOE and the Army Corps, and buildings have been sited within 300 feet of the existing Great Blue Heron rookery, in at least three instances, Staff believe there is a very reasonable probability of their being significant adverse impacts from this development that iy Environmental impact Study Status Updates November 17, 1988 Page 5 should be addressed in- an environmental impact statement. Such as EIS would also provide a high degree of protection to the project proponents from later challenges of the adequacy of their environmental ' documentation. Staff have prepared a letter to the applicants indicating that there is a very good likelihood that ' they will be asked to do such an EIS and asking them if they want to withdraw their application in order to evaluate their options or have the ERC go ahead and issue a threshold determination. If you have any questions about any of the above projects please let me know. I hope you find this status report helpful. DKE:mjp iy DOS-61 %• 0 CITY OF RENTON mu. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor PLANNING DIVISION October 27, 1988 Robert W. Thorpe, AICP R.W. Thorpe & Associates 1300 Alaska Building 2nd & Cherry Street Seattle, Washington 98055 RE: Monterey Terrace-Supplemental EIS Dear Mr. Thorpe: This letter is to inquire into the status of the amendments to and the signing of the Contract for Services for the ERADCO Supplemental EIS. As you will recall, on August 8, 1988, I sent copies of the Contract for Services document to you for signing. On August 24, 1988, we briefly discussed the project following a meeting on another development proposal (on the Nu Dawn site) in the City of Renton at which you attended. At that meeting you indicated that you were waiting for ERADCO to decide when funds would be deposited with the City so that the Timeline-Project Schedule could be established and inserted into the Contract for Services. To date we have not received the Contract for Services nor information on when we might expect this document. Please let me know the status of the contract as we would like to keep the file record up to date and the project moving forward. If I or my staff can be of any assistance to you please let me know as soon as possible. Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE/JSM:m jp 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2550 A R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. ❑ Planning • Landscape • Environmental • Economics Principals: Jon Potter Robert W. Thorpe, AICP Associates: Jennifer Tubb July 13, 1988 POLICY CEV'ELOFM E:e7 DEI'aIITMENI CITY OF RENTON Mr. Donald K. Erickson, AICP i� JUL 1 8 1988rZoning Administrator City of Renton ly1V(� E Building and Zoning Dept. L5 U +J 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Monterey Terrace Rezone Supplemental EIS Dear Don: Attached herewith is the revised contract per your letter of June 29th. We met yesterday with representatives of ERADCO, including Pat Easter, Mok Smith and Joe Tucker. They have agreed to the requirements of the City and will transmit under separate cover the deposit for $20,000. The change in Scope of Work has been modified per the attached agreement by Transportation Planning and Engineering as follows: 1) to include the 3rd Street and Sunset Blvd. intersection, 2) cummulative impacts, and 3) their payment process which will be per RWTA's on basis of deliverables rather than a monthly billing. We have also modified the contract per your request for: item number 7, Indemnificat (as we understand his request) and have included the language under Legal Fees for the City Attorney as item No. 11 with 12, 13 & 14 renumbered. We typed this per your request. I would note that since this a standard city contract you may wish to change your standard format and insert it in this rather than have our typing which is different from the standard contract. That could be transmitted to us for my signature following you approval if you deem appropriate. Otherwise, we believe this contract is ready to be signed and us to proceed with the work we have done to date on the Supplemental EIS. We would appreciate your advising us as to the status of this CH2M-Hill Transportation Benefit Study for this area as that will be a critical element in our work efforts. Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 98104•(206)624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503• 1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •(907)276-0005 Page 2 Mr. Donald Erickson July 13, 1988 Thank you for your review of this final contract form. We are wery anxious to have it approved and continue our work efforts. Please advise by -phone when it has been approved. Thanks for your assistance. Sincerely, R.W.THORPE &, OCIAT , INC. �f Robert W. Tho , AIC RWT/ap CC: Vic Bishop - T P & E Pat Easter/Mok Smith/Joe Tucker - ERADCO Larry Warren - City Attorney Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle,WA 9B104•[206)624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503•1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •(9073 276-0005 R.W.Thorpe6Aaeoueree R.W. THORPE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONTRACT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of ,�3iir$i , 1988, by and between the City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation, (hereinafter called "City"), and R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc., a Washington Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the following promises, warranties, and covenants, it is agreed between the parties as follows: 1. Employment of Consultant: The City hereby agrees to employ the Consultant and the Consultant hereby agrees to perform the services hereinafter set forth. The Consultant is employed to produce the described SEPA documents as set forth in Paragraph 2 and Attachment A, Scope of Work. The Consultant is authorized to use TP&E - Traffic (and Stepan Assoc.- Civil Eng.) as a subconsultant. No other subconsultants shall be employed unless authorized in writing by the City. Nothing in this contract shall be construed to create an employee - employer relationship between the Consultant, its employees and the City. 2. Scone of Work: The Consultant shall furnish the necessary equipment, materials and professionally trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A, "Scope of Work," which is attached hereto, and is incorporated into this agreement as though fully set forth herein. The Consultant hereby warrants that it has the necessary experience, qualified and trained personnel, equipment and materials to complete the work detailed in Exhibit A, Scope of Work. 3. Time of Performance: The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be performed according to Exhibit B, Time Schedule of Completion, attached hereto, and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all the Consultant's services shall be completed and . all products shall be delivered by (Est) FEIS - ;.Sep t 1988, notwithstanding delays due to factors that are beyond the control of the Consultant. If, after receiving Notice to Proceed, Consultant is delayed in the performance of its services by factors that are beyond its control, Consultant shall notify the City of the delay and shall prepare a revised estimate of time and cost needed to complete the Project and submit the revision to the City for its approval. Time schedules are subject to mutual agreement for any revision unless specifically described as otherwise herein. 4. Payment for Services: The Consultant agrees to perform work specified in the Scope of Work and City agrees to pay the Consultant an amount, subject to conditions set forth in this Contract, not to exceed $16,350 for services rendered in fulfillment of the Scope of Work. Payment of said sum will include payment for all necessary 4 • • R.N. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. CONTRACT FOR SERVICES • PAGE 2 labor, materials, and facilities used in the completion of the "Scope of Work." Attached as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference is the schedule of payments for the completion of specified work products. In the event City desires services exceeding the Scope of Services, Consultant shall promptly provide a written estimated completion schedule and detailed scope of services for such Additional Services. Additional Services shall be paid upon a time and expense basis utilizing the fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit C. 5 Project Management: The Project Manager for the Consultant shall be Robert W. Thorpe, AICP The Project Manager for the City shall be Donald K. Erickson. All correspondence, work orders, payment requests concerning this project shall be directed to these individuals. 6. Warranty of Authority: The Consultant hereby warrants and represents that the person who has executed this contract has full authority from the Consultant to do so. The City hereby warrants that the Mayor and City Clerk of City have full power to execute this contract: 7. Indemnification: The parties further agree that neither party shall be liable for the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of the other party with respect to development, management, operation of the property or projec•t•with respect to the performance of each party's respective duties and obligations,under this agreement: To that end, each party shall indemnify, hold the other harmless - - the other party against any damages, including costs of litigation and attorney's fees, incurred with respect to any claims or legal actions resulting from the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the imdemnifying party. 8. Products of Services: All documents, working documents, notes, maps, drawings, photos, etc. produced by or for.the Consultant, in furtherance • • of this Contract, shall be the property of the City and shall be delivered to the City prior to full payment for services under this Contract. 9. Additional Responsibilities: The City shall endeavor to provide the Consultant in a timely manner with all necessary criteria and full information pertinent to the services to be rendered by the Consultant. Further, the City shall endeavor to make available to the Consultant all information, drawings, maps, specifications in City's possession which City and the Consultant consider pertinent to the Consultant's Scope of Work. The Consultant agrees to perform the work specified in a timely manner and to complete the work in a form acceptable to the City within the specified budget and time authorized by this Contract notwithstanding delays due to factors that are beyond the control of the • Consultant. 10. Assignment of Rights: Neither party may assign its rights and obligations under this Contract without the express written consent of the other party. 11. If either party hereto shall bring suit to enforce this contract, the prevailing party, as defined by the laws of the State of Wash— ington, shall receive those remedies and costs and. Attorney fees allowed by law. All lawsuits brought by either party for enforce— ment of this contract shall first be brought in the King County, Washington Superior Court. - - • R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. CONTRACT FOR SERVICES PAGE 3 12. gntire Contract: This agreement, consisting of 3 pages and Exhibits A, B, C constitutes the entire agreement or contract between the parties. The agreements set forth in this contract supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This agreement may not be amended except in writing signed by the parties hereto. • .1 :. Professional Responsibility: - Consultant represents that the services shall be performed, within the limits prescribed by this Contract as amended, in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other professional Consultants performing similar services in the State of Washington or of the type used in the Project under similar circumstances. No other representations to City, express or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included. or intended in this Contract or in any report, opinion, document or otherwise. Opportunity to Remedy: The parties agree that in the event of alleged error or omission by Consultant in performance of the Project, City shall • notify Consultant promptly in writing of the fact and allow Consultant a reasonable time to remedy the problem. Upon notice, Consultant shall promptly review and remedy the problem at the cost of Consultant, if Consultant accepts responsibility for it. City agrees not to remedy the problem at the cost of Consultant without first giving Consultant a reasonable opportunity to remedy the problem. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to remedy any problem that arises out of their performance under this contract whenever this is possible and where the Consultant cannot remedy the problem by itself, it shall use its best effort to work with others to remedy the problem. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY and R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. have executed this Contract as of the date first set forth above: CI 0 ' REN' •� by Rec: . President Zoning ,dmiistra or R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. Earl Clymer, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Lawrence Warren, City Attorney EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES ERADCO/HONTEREY TERRACE EIS The scope outlined below is for preparation of the Draft and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements (SDEIS and SFEIS) for the ERADCO/Monterey Terrace multifamily project in Renton, Washington. R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. (RWT/A) (the Consultant) will prepare the SDEIS and SFEIS consistent with the State Environmental Policy Act and the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance, Chapter 28 of the Renton Zoning Code. The Consultant has reviewed the previous studies for the project prepared by Stepan and Associates (engineering) and Jim Eaton (geotechnical analysis), Hamlin Associates (transportation study) and determined that the studies may need to be supplemented and expanded by the subconsultants to provide the information and detail necessary to complete the preliminary DEIS. It has also been determined that Vic Bishop (TP&E) will provide all necessary traffic study to the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with the subconsultants, review their reports for adequacy and completeness, and incorporate the information into the DEIS. The Consultant will provide a description and comparative evaluation of the alternatives, including the proposal in the SDEIS. - A discussion of the affected environment, environmental impacts, proposed mitigating measures and other possible mitigating measures for the alternatives, including the proposal will also be prepared for the following elements of the enviornment indentified -in the scoping process: - I. Earth - The DEIS will incorporate Eaton's geotechnical engineering study for the project site and the Earth section of the DEIS .will address existing soils, geologic and topographic conditions; results of field exploration of subsurface conditions; soil permeability issues; recommendations for drainage and erosion control; issues related to clearing and grading, and the movement of earth material on and off-site; and measures to ensure foundation support and slope stability. (RWT/A with input from Stepan & Associates - Gary Grey. ) II. Water Quantity/Quality - The surface water quantity and quality information will utilize previous reports by Jim Eaton, P.E., Aquifer Studies by CH2M-Hill and current mitigation measures by the City's Public Works Department, .i.e.: Ron Olson. It will include an analysis of pre and post-development drainage characteristics; erosion control and detention requirements; and relationship to requirements; and relationship to the City's critical drainage basin designation. The Consultant will review and integrate the data into the Water section of the DEIS. (RWT/A) r• III. Land Use .- The relationship to the city of Renton's zoning code and comprehensive plan policies (including the City's Greenbelt Policies) will be discussed by the Consultant. The relationship to existing land use, zoning and comprehensive plan designations in the immediate vicinity will also be included. The proposal and all alternatives will be assessed. A discussion of the impacts of the density and other land use compatibility issues will be provided. (RWT/A) IV. Recreation - The proposal includes the provision for on-site recreational opportunities. Both passive (trails, open space) and active facilities are proposed. The increase in demand represented by the on-site population will be evaluated in relation to the proposed opportunities to gauge overall impacts to local and regional park and recreation facilities. Existing facilities in the area will be described and impacts assessed. Impacts from all alternatives will also be addressed. Measures to mitigate impacts will be addressed. (RWT/A) V. Transportation - The specific transportation study for the project and alternatives and the transporation section of the SDEIS, will address trip generation (including an explanation of trip generation rates); level-of-service impacts at the key intersections; circulation, parking and access issues; and recommendations for mitigation. A key element will be acccess alternatives utilizing the CH2M-Hill Transportation Benefit Study (TBS) for the area projected to be completed in early June 1988. Impacts regarding pedestrian safety and access and mitigating measures will be assessed by th.e transportation consultant and transportation section as well. TP&E, Inc. will, prepare the transportation report and summary for this EIS. (TP&E) VI. Public Services and Utilities - The Consultant will address impacts on the local service providers including fire, police and school services for the proposal and alternatives. Existing capacities and anticipated impacts will be identified. An estimate of anticipated public costs and revenues associated with the project and alternatives will be made based on a model approved by the City of Renton. (RWT/A) VII. Plants and Animals - The Consultant will discuss existing habitat conditions on-site and will evaluate post-development impacts. The impacts from clearing and grading and opportunities for mitigation will be assessed. (RWT/A) VIII. Proposed Action and Alternatives - The Consultant will address up to two alternatives to the proposed action. The alternatives will include the no-action alternative, and retention of the site in its' present undeveloped state; an alternative developed consistent with the R-4 zoning designation with approximately 525 units and a similar site plan as the proposal. (RWT/A) IX. Meetings - The Consultant will attend up to five (5) meetings on the DEIS and three (3) meetings on the FEIS with City of Renton officials. (RWT/A) X. Printing - The Consultant assumes printing of up to fifteen (15) copies of the preliminary DEIS. XI. Draft EIS - Upon submittal of the preliminary DEIS and receipt of comments from the City and proponent, the Consultant shall revise, complete and issue the DEIS. The fee for completion of the DEIS includes printing of up to eighty (80) copies of the document for public and agency review. XII. Final EIS - The FEIS budget is an estimate. The Consultant's estimated budget and scope for the FEIS assumes revising the DEIS, printing up to eighty (80) copies and responding to a relatively small number of substantive comment. letters (10 to 12) dealing with the DEIS. If the City requires the Consultant to address additional comment letters and/or comments dealing with topics not discussed in the DEIS, or a level of detail not provided within the scope, or increase the number of copies, the estimate for the FEIS may be revised. If the scope and cost estimate are beyond what has been estimated herein, the consultant will meet with the City to develop a mutually . acceptable scope and budget. ASSUMPTIONS • - A) Specific project description information, including reproducible site plans, elevations, and cross sections will be provided to the Consultant by the proponent at the outset of the EIS effort and shall be .agreed to in writing by the City. In addition, the • proponent will provide all necessary written and graphic material for all alternatives including site plans, number and layout of parking, access/circulation, number of units and stories, street orientation, recreation areas, etc. Such information will provide . • for a complete description of the proposal and alternatives and relevant design features. B) That the SDEIS and SFEIS assumes a previous analysis for the same proposal was completed in 1980. and 1981 resulting in the City Hearing Examiner and City Council approving a rezone and PUD for the subject site, with the approval lapsing because of no approved building permit. The proposal is the same and this is the basis for a Supplemental EIS utilizing the previous DEIS and FEIS as well as subsequent and concurrent studies for Renton Voc-Technical Institute (RVIT), Lexington Ridge , McMann, the CH2M-Hill Transporation Benefit Study (TBS) and other area studies and EIS's. . y , C) The major issues to be addressed include Earth, Water, Land Use, Recreation, Transportation, Public Services, and Plants. Emphasis will be placed on these issues by Consultant and by the subconsultants to the proponent. • • • EXHIBIT B ESTIMATED TIMELINE - PROJECT SCHEDULE • 1 . Completion of TBS (CH2M-Hill) & Aquifer Recharge Studies (per Renton Public Wrks) 6/1/88 . • 2. Contract Approval by City ? 3. Review by City of WDEIS for Monterey Terrace plus input on Traffic Impact Analysis Requirements beyond TBS-to RWT/A 6/13/88 4. RWT/A provide Revised WDEIS w/changes 6/30/80 5. Consultant revisions to Traffic . 7/8/88 6. City Review - Fiaal Revisions for printing . 7/22/88 7. DISTRIBUTION of DEIS . 7/28/88 8. Comments returned on DEIS (30 day review period) • 8/29/88 9. City - Scoping of Final Comment/Response 9/9/88 • 10.' Consultant - WD FEIS • • 9/20/88 • 11 . City Review - to Consultant 9/30/88 12.. Consultant Changes to City 10/11/88 13. DISTRIBUTE FEIS 10/18/88 14. REZONE HEARING - Hearing Examiner Early Noy.' 15. Rezone Council Early Dec.' * Subject to Appeal Periods . • EXHIBIT C . COST ESTIMATES AND SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS COST ESTIMATES . WORK ITEM RESPONSIBILITY COST EST • TOTAL 1) SDEIS RWT/A • 4,850* • • Transportation TP&E 6,000 (Includes Meetings/ Working Drafts) 10,850 2) Printing SDEIS Contract (80 copies) 800-1 ,200 1 ,200 3) SFEIS (10-12 letters). RWT/A 2,000 TP&E 1 ,500 3,500 • 4) Printing SFEIS Contract (80 copies) ' 700-800 • 800 • TOTAL. $16,350* * Estimated fees beyond those paid to RWT/A for Environmental Assessment • update for Rezone Application and working DSEIS by ERADCO • CONSULTANT — COST ESTIMATES RWT/A SDEIS Professional Services Project Management (RWT) 15 hrs @ $60/hr = 900 Environmental Analysis (JB) 60 hrs @ $35/hr = 2,100 Graphics (JT) 20 hrs @ $35/hr = 700 Word Processing (CA) 30 hrs @ $25/hr = 750 4,450 Expenses . Mileage/Xerox/Reproduction 400 4,850 SFEIS Project Management (RWT) 4 hrs @ $60/hr = 240 • Environmental Analysis .(JB) 30 hrs @ $35/hr = 1 ,050 . Word. Processing 20 hrs @ $25/hr = 500 Expenses: 210 2,000 • • TP&E . . SDEIS (See Attached Proposal) . • 6,000 • SFEIS (See Attached Proposal) 1 ,500 TOTAL CONSULTANTS: SDEIS — $10,850 SFEIS — $ 3,500 TOTAL WITH PRINTING ESTIMATES SDEIS - $12,050 . SFEIS — $ 4,300 SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS: . 1)_ TAM on. a Monthly Billing Basis.; 2) Balance of SDEIS & SFEIS within 30 days of Distribution. . yy„ L r , TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2101 -112th AVENUE N.E,SUITE 110— BELLEVUE,WASHINGTON 98004 VICTOR H.BISHOP P E. TELEPHONE 455-5320—AREA CODE 206 President July 12, 1988 R. W. Thorpe R. W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. 1300 Alaska Building 2nd & Cherry Seattle, WA 98111 . Re: Monterey Terrace Draft EIS Dear Bob: I am pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional traffic engineering consulting services to conduct a traffic im- pact analysis to serve as an. Appendix to the DEIS for the propos- ed Monterey Terrace Multi-Family Development. The analysis will cover four alternatives: 515 Multi-family units as currently pro- posed, 425 units as per approved ERADCO proposal in 1981, , 125 single family units, and no action. I. SCOPE OF WORK . A. Conduct a scoping meeting with City of Renton staff. B. Coordinate with CH2M Hill and TDA concerning current studies being conducted by them in the study area. C. Analyze existing conditions including street system inven- tory, daily traffic counts, AM and PM peak hour traffic counts, Level of Service (LOS) calculation for intersections in the study area (4 intersections, listed below) , accident problems, transit service, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. 1. N.E. 3rd St. & Sunset Blvd. 2. N.E. 3rd St. & Edmonds Ave. N.E. 3. SR 169 & "Connector" Road. 4. "Connector" Road & Local Access Road to Monterey Terrace site. D. Investigate planned improvements in the study area by the City of Renton, WSDOT and other approved developments in the study area. R. W. Thorpe R. W. Thorpe & .Associates, Inc. - July 12, 1988 Page -2- E. Analyse conditions for a future year to be determined in cooperation with the City of Renton staff. This analysis would include determing an annual growth factor from fore- casted data by the PSCOG, King County and the City of Renton, traffic volumes created by other proposed projects in the area, and inclusion of a connecting roadway between NE 3rd St. and SR 169 per the current Transportation Benefit District Study by CH2M Hill. F. Analyse project impacts for the future year. This analysis will include project trip generation and distribution, deter- mination of total daily, AM and PM peak hour traffic vol- umes, and Level of Service calculations for the identified intersections in I.C. above. G. Determine mitigating measures and unavoidable adverse impacts. II. EXTRA WORK This proposal is based on the assumption that no substantial traffic issues exist that need additional analysis or research at the intersections identified above and other locations. If sub- stantial traffic issues are discovered during this work, extra work may be necessary. Additional traffic engineering services which may be request- ed but which are not listed in Section I (SCOPE OF WORK) will be considered extra work. Such work may include items such as addi- tional analysis or research on substantial traffic issues dis- covered, changes to site plan or access, additional traffic volume counts, analysis of an expanded . study . area, negotiating with the County or others, or attending public hearings. Preparation of the Final EIS is expected to take approximate- ly 20 hours depending on the number of comments received. This preparation is considered extra work and will be negotiated when the extent of the comments on the DEIS is known. Extra work will not proceed without further .authorization. R. W. Thorpe R. W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. July 12, 1988 Page -3- III. FEE SCHEDULE The fee for the items of work listed in Section I (SCOPE OF WORK) will be on the basis of time and expenses in accordance with the following estimates of work hours and rates with a max- imum amount of Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000.00 ) which will not be exceeded without further authorization. Authorized extra work will also be charged on a time and expense basis in accordance with the following rates. Principal Consultant 9.0 hrs @ $95/hr $ 855.00 Transportation Planner 85.0 hrs @ $50/hr 4,250.00 Traffic Specialist/Drafter 10 . 0 hrs @ $34/hr 340.00 Clerical 6.0 hrs @ $34/hr 204.00 Subtotal $5, 649.00 Word Processor/Computer 4 hrs @ $10/hr 40.00 Engineering Analysis Computer 8 hrs @ $15/hr 120. 00 CAD System . 6 hrs @ $20/hr 120.00 Travel and reproduction costs 71.00 Maximum Amount $6.000.00 These hourly fee rates include all overhead and profit plus incidental costs and are in effect for a period of one year from date of contract, when rates will be increased to reflect current costs. IV. PAYMENT An invoice for the work completed to date will be sent at the end of each calendar month and at the conclusion of the pro- ject. Invoices are payable within fifteen (15 ) days of receipt of payment by R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. from the City and are subject to 1i% per month interest charge on amounts that are past due. • R. W. Thorpe " R. W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. July 12, 1988 Page -4- In the event that payment in full, including interest due, has not been received by TP&E within 60 days of completion of work, action will be instituted to file a lien against the proper- ty. Included in the lien amount will be all expenses and costs for lien filing, any over-run amount, whether invoiced or not, the total unpaid amount invoiced, and compounded interest as stated in above paragraph. The owners or representatives of the development agree to pay all collection costs and attorneys' fees in the event it becomes necessary to collect the amount due under this contract whether or not through litigation. V. TIME SCHEDULE We are prepared to begin work on this project immediately up- on receipt of your authorization and assuming coordination with the City of Renton and CH2M Hill are conducted in a timely man- ner, we will complete a draft report for review within twenty one (21) days. This schedule, however, may be subject to extension if there are delays beyond the control of TP&E. VI. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY ' Any and all liability, claim for damages, cost of defense, or expenses to be levied against TP&E will be limited to a sum not to exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00) or the amount of its fee whichever is greater, on account of any injury or dam- age to persons or property or arising out of any design defect, error, omission, or professional negligence. Further, the client agrees to notify any contractor or subcontractor who may perform work in connection with or making use of any design, report, or study prepared by TP&E of such limitation of liability and re- quire as a condition precedent to its performing the work a like limitation of liability on their part as against TP&E. In the event a client fails to obtain a like limitation of liability pro- vision as to injury or damage to persons or property, design de- fects, errors, omissions, or professional negligence shall be allocated between the client and TP&E in such a manner that the aggregate liability of TP&E shall not exceed Fifty . Thousand Dollars ($50, 000.00) or -the amount of its fee, whichever is greater. . R. W. Thorpe R. W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. July 12, 1988 Page -5- VII. CONTRACT A copy of this proposal signed by an authorized representa- tive of the client and returned to us will be sufficient for con- tractual purposes. _ Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. . Victor H. Bishop, P.E. , President VHB/pic Authorization: Name Representing Date CITY OF RENTON `$ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney NIL Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean -Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell -Mary deg uu �pp g,, Assistant City Attorneys �u(: U' LGFrJ�J I Gtif°ai�Tdacl�� CITY OF RENTON I, JUL 22 1988ti • July 20, 1988 ' E C, k: 1 U E TO: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. Contract for Services Dear Don: I have reviewed the above captioned contract and it is approved as to legal form. Lawrence . Warren LJW:as. cc: Mayor A8 .26 :28. Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 CITY OF RENTON • oral "Y v. BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT a, Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director June 29, 1988 Robert W. Thorpe, AICP R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. 1300 Alaska Building 2nd Avenue & Cherry Street Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Monterey Terrace Rezone Supplemental EIS Dear Bob: As I discussed with you a couple of weeks ago when you told me about the joint proposal you were working on to present to Mr. Colt, Gary Norris, the City' s Traffic Engineer did have some concerns about the Scope of Work for the traffic consultant, Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. Specifically, he was concerned about the study area that CH2M Hill is using, the intersections to be included within this area and the "horizon" or future year. The Traffic Engineer is very concerned about the present accident prob- problem at the intersection of N. 3rd Street and Sunset Blvd. N. and wants it to be addressed as part of the mitigation measures and impact analysis. He is very concerned about the accumulative impacts of this and CENTRON's two projects. The other area that needs to be addressed is the contract itself. The City Attorney has reviewed it and wants Item 7 . Indemnification to be revised to its former wording. He does not believe that the City can agree to defend another party against any damages incurred with respect to any negligent acts, errors or omissions by such a party. Since the con- consultant is doing the work for the City, it is the consultant who is being asked to indemnify the City against third party actions, rather than the City indemnifying the consultant. Likewise, the Attorney would like an additional item added that addresses legal fees. The preferred language here would read: "If either party hereto shall bring suit to enforce this contract, the prevailing party, as defined by the laws of the State of Washington, shall receive those remedies and 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 } costs and attorney fees allowed by law. All lawsuits brought by either party for enforcement of this contract shall first be brought in the King County, Washington Superior Court. " Also, as I had mentioned to you, since we will only be paying you on the basis of products found acceptable at pre- scribed amounts of compensation, you may wish to pay the traffic consultant in the same way rather than monthly as he has proposed. The City Attorney also believes that the limitation of liability clause contained in TP&E ' s contract with you places an excessive burden on you as the consultant to the City. The attorney believes the minimum amount of liability coverage for this type of contract should be at least $250, 000 per incident. I look forward to receiving these revisions from you so that we can proceed with the contract. Exhibit A, Scope of Services now seems adequate. If you have any questions please give me a call. Sincerely, (/ v Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator P.S. As I mentioned earlier we will need a check from the project proponent for a minimum amount of $20, 000 to cover your and the sub-consultant's costs as well as our costs in administering this contract. DE: cc: Mok Smith, ERADCO ., CITY OF RENTON t$ Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Daniel Kellogg -Mark E. Barber - David M. Dean -Zanetta L. Fontes - Robert L. Sewell - Mary deVuono, Assistant City Attorneys June 20, 1988 TO: Donald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator FROM: Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney RE: Three-Party EIS Contract Dear Don: The three-party contract forwarded to me is basically a two-party contract. The only responsibility on the part of the third party is the requirement to deposit funds and to provide the consultant, in a timely manner, with necessary criteria and information pertinent to the services to be rendered. The proponent really has very little to do with that latter requirement, as the EIS is supposed to be under the control of the city. City ordinance provides for the deposit of the necessary sums . Therefore, I do not see that this document needs to be a three-party contract. I also note that Paragraph 7 is a very ambiguous contractual section, and is probably against public policy as it respects the city and the project proponent. I would suggest that Paragraph 7 be eliminated. You and I may wish to discuss this topic further, and it may be necessary to meet with R.W. Thorpe and Associates, Inc . or the proponent, or both, before finalizing the c act. Lawrence J. arren LJW:as . cc : Mayor A8 .24 : 75 . CITY OF RENTON EG [ [in 'ti 211qpi8 Post Office Box 626 - 100 S 2nd Street - Renton, Washington 98057 - (206) 255-8678 ' =till R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. ❑ Planning • Landscape • Environmental • Economics Principals: Jon Potter Robert W. Thorpe, AICP Associates: May 31 , 1988 Jennifer Tubb Mr. Don Erickson Zoning Administrator Building Department City of Renton 200 Mill Ave S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: ERADCO - Monterey Terrace Rezone Application - Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Contract Dear Don: I appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and John Adamson concerning the current status of the ERADCO EIS and Rezone Application. Since that day we have discussed the traffic needs with two or three traffic engineers and utilized your list in a rank order sense to request proposals from two of those parties. At this time it appears we will be utilizing Vic Bishop of TPE. Vie is preparing a proposal and a timeline for his work efforts. I have provided him copies of the 1981 ERADCO Final EIS, a copy of the Renton Voc-Technical EIS traffic section and contacts at CH2M-Hill concerning their current work effort and information concerning traffic consultant on the Lexington Ridge Project. He is prepared to begin work immediately upon receipt of the CH2M-Hill Report and provide a fairly quick turn around on this project. I have provided herein a copy of the contract that you requested and our latest cost estimates and timeline for your review. This may need some modification when we incorporate Vic Bishop's contract, however I felt that in order to give you a chance to review this and the scope of work, this might occur now, and then your comments and recommended changes could be accomplished at the same time as the incorporation of language about TP&E being a subconsultant on Traffic. The TP&E contract scope of work would be to 1) review the 1981 traffic analysis, in that the proposal is the same; 2) to utilize the CH2M-Hill information as background; 3) to assess impacts of the project; and 4) project the timing of proposed road improvements in the area to serve the site on a total or phased development basis. Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 98104•CC206]624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503• 1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •(907)27S-0005 Page 2 - Mr. Don Erickson - 5/31/88 I trust that this is consistent with our conversation and look forward to your request for any changes in the contract. Respectfully submitted, R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. Robert W. orp0/, AI RWT/ap CC: John Adamson Mok Smith, ERADCO • Lynn Hurst, Montgomery, Purdue, Blankenship & Austin Vic Bishop, TP&E Enclosures • • Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle. WA 98104•[206]624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503•1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •[907]276-0005 a.w.n opas neaoa a • EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES ERADCO/MOHTEREY TERRACE EIS The scope outlined below is for preparation of the Draft and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statements (SDEIS and SFEIS) for the ERADCO/Monterey Terrace multifamily project in Renton, Washington. R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. (RWT/A) (the Consultant) will prepare the SDEIS and SFEIS consistent with the State Environmental Policy Act and the City of Renton Environmental Ordinance, Chapter 28 of the Renton Zoning Code. The Consultant has reviewed the previous studies for the project prepared by Stepan and Associates (engineering) and Jim Eaton (geotechnical analysis), Hamlin ,Associates (transportation study) and determined that the studies may need to be supplemented and expanded by the subconsultants to provide the information and detail necessary to complete the preliminary DEIS. It has also been determined that Vic Bishop (TP&E) will provide all necessary traffic study to the Consultant. The Consultant will coordinate with the subconsultants, review their reports for adequacy and ' completeness, and incorporate the information into the DEIS. The Consultant will provide a description and comparative evaluation of the alternatives, including the proposal in the SDEIS. A discussion of the affected environment, environmental impacts, proposed mitigating measures and other possible mitigating measures for the alternatives, including the proposal will also be prepared for the following elements of the enviornment indentified in the scoping process: I. Earth - The DEIS will incorporate Eaton's geotechnical engineering study for the project site and the Earth section of the DEIS will address existing soils, geologic and topographic conditions; results of field exploration of subsurface conditions; soil permeability issues; recommendations for drainage and erosion control; issues related to clearing and grading, and the movement of earth material on and off-site; and measures torensure foundation support and slope stability. (RWT/A with input from Stepan & Associates - Gary Grey. ) II. Water Quantity/Quality - The surface water quantity and quality ,information will utilize previous reports by Jim Eaton, P.E., Aquifer Studies by CH2M-Hill and current mitigation measures by the City's Public Works Department, i.e.: Ron Olson. It will include an analysis of pre and post-development drainage , characteristics; erosion control and detention requirements; and relationship to requirements; and relationship to the City's critical drainage basin designation. The Consultant will review and integrate the data into the Water section of the DEIS. (RWT/A) / • III. Land Use - The relationship to the city of Renton's zoning code and comprehensive plan policies (including the City's Greenbelt Policies) will be discussed by the' Consultant. The relationship to existing land use, zoning and comprehensive plan designations in the immediate vicinity will also be included. The proposal and all alternatives will be assessed. A discussion of the impacts of the density and other land use compatibility issues will be provided. (RWT/A) IV. Recreation - The proposal includes the provision for on-site recreational opportunities. Both passive, (trails, open space) and active facilities are proposed. The increase in demand represented by the on-site population will be evaluated in relation to the proposed opportunities to gauge overall impacts to local and regional park and recreation facilities. Existing facilities in the area will be described and impacts assessed. Impacts from all alternatives will also be addressed. Measures to mitigate impacts will be addressed. (RWT/A) V. Transportation - The specific transportation study.. for the project and alternatives and the transporation section of the SDEIS, will address trip generation (including an explanation of trip generation r.ates); :lev,el-of-service impacts at the key intersections; circulation, parking and access issues; and recommendations for mitigation. A key element will be acecess alternatives utilizing.the CH2M-Hill Transportation Benefit Study (TBS) for the area projected to be completed in early June 1988. Impacts regarding pedestrian safety and access and mitigating measures will be assessed by the transportation consultant and transportation section as well. TP&E, Inc. will prepare the transportation report and summary for this EIS. (TP&E) VI. Public Services, and Utilities - The Consultant will address impacts on the local service providers including fire, police and school services for the proposal and alternatives. Existing capacities and anticipated impacts will be identified. An estimate of anticipated public costs and revenues associated with the project and alternatives will be made based on a model approved by the City of Renton. (RWT/A) VII. Plants and Animals - The Consultant will discuss existing habitat conditions on-site and will evaluate post-development impacts. The impacts from clearing and grading and opportunities for mitigation will be assessed. (RWT/A) VIII. Proposed Action. and Alternatives - The Consultant will address up to two alternatives to the proposed action. The alternatives will include the no-action alternative, and retention of the site in its' present undeveloped state; an alternative developed consistent with the R-4 zoning designation with approximately 525 units and a similar site plan as the proposal. (RWT/A) IX. Meetings. -. The Consultant will attend up to five (5) meetings on the DEIS and three (3) meetings on the FEIS with City of Renton officials. (RWT/A) X. Printing -_The. Consultant assumes printing of up to fifteen (15) copies of the preliminary DEIS. . XI. Draft. EIS. — Upon submittal of the preliminary DEIS and receipt of comments from. the City and proponent, the Consultant shall revise, complete and issue the DEIS. The fee for completion of the DEIS includes printing of up to eighty (80) copies of the document for public and agency review. XII. Final EIS - The FEIS budget is an estimate. The Consultant's - estimated budget and scope for the FEIS assumes revising the DEIS, printing up to eighty (80) copies and responding to a relatively small number of substantive comment letters (10 to 12) dealing with the DEIS. If the City requires the Consultant to address additional comment letters and/or comments dealing with topics not discussed in the DEIS, or a level of detail not provided within the scope, or increase the number of copies, the estimate for the FEIS may be revised. If the scope and cost estimate are beyond what has been estimated herein, the consultant will meet with the City to develop a mutually acceptable scope and budget. ASSUMPTIONS A) Specific project description information, including reproducible site plans, elevations, and cross sections will be provided to the Consultant by the proponent at the outset of the EIS effort and shall be agreed to in writing by the City. In addition, the proponent will provide all necessary written and graphic material for all alternatives including site plans, number and layout of parking, access/circulation, number of units and stories, street orientation, recreation areas, etc. Such information will provide for a complete description of the proposal and alternatives and relevant design features. B) That the SDEIS and SFEIS assumes a previous analysis for the same proposal was completed in 1980 and 1981 resulting in the City Hearing Examiner and City Council approving a rezone and PUD for the subject site, with the approval lapsing because of no approved building permit. The proposal is the same and this is the basis for a Supplemental EIS utilizing the previous DEIS and FEIS as well as subsequent and concurrent studies for Renton Voc-Technical Institute (RVIT), Lexington Ridge, McMann, the CH2M-Hill Transporation Benefit Study (TBS) and other area, studies and EIS's. C) The major issues to be addressed include Earth, Water, Land Use, Recreation, Transportation, Public Services, and Plants. Emphasis will be placed on these issues by Consultant and by the subconsultants to the proponent. MEMORANDUM June 23, 1988 CITY OF R NTON RCEOVEj TO: Don Erickson JUN gg p�� 1g i98 0 FROM: Gary Norris BUILDINU ? ZONING DEPT. SUBJECT: Monterey Terrace Supplemental E. I.S. I reviewed the subject scope of work for the traffic impact analysis. I have discussed this subject with Dave Enger of T.P.E. and noted the extensive work being performed by CH2MHILL as a part of the CENTRON/Maple Valley Transportation Benefit District. There are elements that need more specifics, such as: 1. What is the study area 2. What intersections are included 3. What is the horizon year (future year) A major issue to be addressed is the present accident problem at the intersection of N. 3rd St. and Sunset Blvd. N. It should be addressed as a part of the mitigation measures and impact analysis. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. cc: Richard C. Houghton Robert E. Bergstrom GAN:cf GAN86 CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director May 27, 1988 Pat Easter ERADCO 18000 Pacific Highway South, Suite 1115 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Monterey Terrace - ERACDO Supplement E.I.S. Dear Pat: Although we usually do not become directly involved with the project proponent when preparing E. I.S. materials, I felt in this case I should let you know where we are as a follow up of the meeting on April 14, 1988 here at City Hall with you, Mr. Smith, Ms. Tobacco, et al. At that meeting I made it very clear that we did not have a Scope of Services or signed contract for Services with R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. to do the supplemental E.I.S. and stated that we would need this as soon as possible. We still do not have an acceptable version of either of these (actually the Scope of Services is a part of the consultant contract) as of this date. I wrote the consultant on May 18, 1988 (attached) again requesting this information and have not yet heard back from him. We are also very concerned that the consultant has proceeded as far as they have (a draft supplement E.I.S. has was submitted to us on April 26, 1988 for our review) without there being a signed contract that clearly spells out what services the consultant is providing, and at what cost. Mr. Thorpe also submitted a "timeline" for the project that we find to be in many instances inconsistent with our own records. There is a whole list of activities accredited to 1988, for example, that occured in 1987 and letters referenced that we do not have in our files. These, however, are not the issue. Rather it is our inability to proceed with this project until a third party agreement has been entered into between the proponent, the consultant and the City and funds deposited with the City sufficient to cover the consultant's costs in preparing the SEIS and the City's costs in reviewing it. Mr. Thorpe has submitted a 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Pat Easter May 27, 1988 Page 2 list of costs and referenced a contract which apparently has been exceeded. Again, this contract has not been sanctioned by the City and is inconsistent with City procedures where we pay the consultant for this City issued document. If you have any questions please call me at 235-2550 at your convenience. I think we all would like to get this project moving as quickly as possible. el K. Erickson, AIC Zoning Administrator DKE:ec pc: Ron Nelson✓ John Adamson • CITY OF RENTON „LL ' ' 1,.; BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director May 18, 1988 Robert W. Thorpe, AICP R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. 1300 Alaska Building Second & Cherry Street Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Monterey Terrace Associates/ERADCO Supplemental EIS Dear Bob: We have reviewed the materials you submitted which were received by us on April 26, 1988. These included a completed copy of the Contract for Services I mailed to you on December 2, 1987, and your working draft of the Supplemental E.I.S. In an initial review of these materials, I noticed that Contract Exhibit A, Scope of Services was missing. I would have called you at that time, but was informed by Jeanette Samek-McKague that you were on holiday for 10 days. Since the Contract for Services was submitted to you last December, the City Attorney has proposed some modifications in language that are not reflected in this earlier version. These changes will need to be incorporated into the Contract before the City will find it acceptable. The major deficiency, however, is the lack of a Scope of Services which, as you know, is really the blueprint and specifications for the Supplemental E.I.S. Without this, we really cannot properly evaluate the adequacy of the draft materials you submitted pursuant to any agreed upon measure. It has been our hope, since last June when we met with you to discuss this project and the need for a formalization of requirements for the scope of work for the Supplemental E.I.S. and contract administration, that you or your firm would submit such a Scope of Services based upon the identified scoping issues and work elements (draft SEIS, SEIS) to be included in the contract. This was reiterated again in my letter of December 2, 1987 to you and again on January 29, 1988, when you and Mr. Smith met with me. I believe this was also made clear, again, at our meeting on April 14, 1988 with you, at which John Adamson, Ron Nelson, Pat Easter, Penny Tabacco, et al, were in attendance. Incidentally, Exhibit B - Project Schedule and Exhibit C - Schedule of Payments are for the preparation of an E.I.S. rather than a Supplemental E.I.S. Again there appears to have been an apparent mix-up in the materials that were submitted to us with your letter of August 19, 1988. In order for us to approve and sign the Contract for Services, we will need proper appendices to be resubmitted as soon as possible. I am also enclosing a copy of the City's most recent consultant contract for services for your review. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 • Robert W. Thorpe May 18, 1988 Page 2 Attached are some general comments on the Draft SEIS you submitted. Again, without a Consultant's Contract (including Scope of Services) we are reluctant to put much time or effort into reviewing this document at this time. If you have any questions, please contact Jeanette Samek-McKague or me. Sincere y, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Attachments DKE:cs Thorpel DRAFT EIS GENERAL COMMENTS: Basic premises from the 1982 E.I.S. are utilized in this draft S.E.I.S. without documentation that conditions prevailing in that year continue to be valid. This draft lists the 1982 plan as an alternative but does not update discussion of impacts of that option in this document. For example, demographic shifts in the intervening six years may have changed household size or composition, car ownership pattern, etc. Update site maps are necessary. The Summary and many of the specific topic sections in this document do not meet the intent of the City to obtain detailed information concerning impacts and, particularly, plans for mitigation. Examples include: 1) a need for upgrading of public services is described in conjunction with the ERADCO project, but there is no discussion of the parameters attendant upon that upgrading nor is any effort made to determine how such improvements might be achieved; 2) a commitment is made to provide for on-site recreation spaces and activities, but plans for such amenities are addressed only in the most general terms and are not identified as commitments; 3) an acknowledgement is granted concerning the need for improved arterials adjacent to the site, but there is little discussion of ways by which this objective might be accomplished -- and the applicant continues to support the initial plan for access to the site without documentation concerning the adequacy of that ingress-egress plan. Some of the other sections of the draft are similarly lacking in adequate presentation. It should be emphasized that the above mentioned concerns are based only upon preliminary review. Additional concerns may be raised in a more complete review; similarly, some•of the concerns expressed above may be resolved in a more complete review. Detailed evaluation and comprehensive analysis of adequacy of. the S.E.I.S. cannot be conducted in the absence of the Scope of Work. R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. nalk ❑ Planning • Landscape • Environmental • Economics Principals: Jon Potter Robert W. Thorpe, AICP Associates: Jennifer Tubb May 17, 1988 Don Erickson Environmental Coordinator City of Renton-Zoning Dept. 211 Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Monterey Terrace-ERADCO Supplemental EIS Process Dear Don: Attached is a revised Working Draft of the Supplemental DEIS for Monterey Terrace Rezone application which includes all ,our work agreed to in Seoping. This includes a section on aquifer recharge issues and mitigating measures as developed by R.W. Thorpe and Associates pursuant to our conversation at the meeting on March 24, 1987. Also included is a draft of Public Services Fiscal Impact Analysis. We trust that this coupled with the previous submittal to you provides the information setforth in the scoping notice of July 24, 1987 concerning this project except traffic. It does require inclusion of site specific information relative to traffic following completion of the Transportation Benefit Study (TBS) by CH2M Hill, which according to Public Works Department is projected to Be completed about June 1st. We trust the transmittal of this information at this time will enable you to review it in the next couple weeks prior to the traffic information being available from CH2M Hill to provide us direction as to the final changes you will need on this report. If the information from CH2M Hill is detailed enough for this site it may be utilized for the Environmental Impact Statement on Monterey Terrace. The other alternative may be to, have them do a site specific analysis or to employ a separate subconsultant for the purpose of analyzing their information and assessing impacts of the proposed rezone on the area. This would be an update of the traffic report as a part of the 1981 FEIS for Monterey Terrace and would incorporate work being done on several other projects in the immediate area., such as Lexington Ridge and the McMann Project. I have also provided as an attachment a chronological history of previous key dates and the dates on the current application and an estimated future timeline that was requested by ERADCO for their information. The key information as it relates transmittal is that the future timeline should be reviewed la you. We would appreciate any recommended changes transmitted to us. Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 96104•(206)624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503• 1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •(907]276-0005 Page 2 Erickson, Don May 17, 1988 We are still awaiting the approval of the contract by your office. We trust from our conversations with other members of the Building Department, that the contract will be available this week. Please advise us as to the status of that during your review of this working draft and any changes you require. Respectfully submitted, ,g/A4, bert . Tho pe, CP RWT/cja cc: Pat Easter/ERADCO Mok Smith/ERADCO Lynn Hurst/Montgomery, Purdue, Blankenship & Austin Colin Quinn/CENTRON Ron Hanson John Adamson Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle,WA 98104•(206]624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503•1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage,AK 99501 •(907]276-0005 R.W Thorpe6Aoaociatee MONTEREY TERRACE/ERADCO TIMELINE Previous Application-_Key Dates Previous Rezone/PUD DEIS 1/30/81 FEIS 5/28/81 Rezone/PUD - Approval (Ord 3113) 12/81 Rezone/PUD - Rescinded (Ord 3709) 2/83 EIS Adequacy Appeal - Denied AAD-012-83 3/17/83 Current Application - Key Dates Current Application (City letter to McMahon-RE: MDWS) 8/6/86 (Hearing on McMahon Rezone) 9/16/86 RWT/A - Begin Analysis-Rezone with Aug/'86 ERADCO Rezone Filed 2/?/88 Environmental Rev. Comm. Decision DS 4/1/87 City Letter to ERADCO & RWT/A 6/3/87 RWT/A Letter to City 6/18/88 Declaration of Significance-Monterey Terr. 6/24/88 D. Erickson Letter to RWT/A 6/30/88 - Require Supplement - Agree RWT/A can perform w/Aquifer and Traffic by CH2M Hill Info by RWT/A - Site Plan + Env to CH2M Hill & Centron 8/5/88 Request for Scoping by RWT/A 9/88 City - Letter DE - RE: 1) Set up Mtg. on Scoping/Contract 12/2/88 2) Aquifer/Traffic Information-from CH2M Hill (Est) Mid Mar. RWT/A - delivered WDEIS to City 3/15/88 Mtg. w/City Staff - Status of Access Road 3/24/88 Transmittal of WDEIS - all sections except traffic (projected 6/1/88) 5/18/88 Contract Signed by City/Contract Pending FUTURE - ESTIMATED TIMELINE 1 . Completion of TBS (CH2M Hill) (per Renton P. Wks) & Aquifer Recharge Studies 6/1/88 2. Review by City of WDEIS for Monterey Terrace plus input on Traffic Impact Analysis Requirements beyond TBS-to RWT/A 6/13/88 3. RWT/A provide Revised WDEIS w/changes 6/23/88 4. Consultant revisions on Traffic 6/30/88 5. City Review - Final Revisions for printing 7/11/88 6. DISTRIBUTION of DEIS 7/20/88 7. Comments returned on DEIS (30 day review pd) 8/23/88 8. City - Scoping of Final Comments/Response 8/30/88 9. Consultant - WD FEIS 9/9/88 10. City Review - to Consultant 9/16/88 11 . Consultant Changes to City 9/23/88 12. DISTRIBUTE FEIS 9/30/88 13. REZONE HEARING - Hearing Examiner Early Oct.* 14. Rezone to Council Early Dec.* * Subject to Appeal Periods Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 98104•(2063 624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503•1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •C907)276-0005 awr,o,v.s A..ociocea c$ 'f'sep, CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division -_- I_.•7 I _c� ,�'/ May 19, 1988 _ = L _, r:,) Mr. Robert W. Thorpe, AICP rt R. W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. 1300 Alaska Building 2nd and Cherry Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Traffic Consultant for Monterey Terrace - ERADCO SEIS Dear Mr. Thorpe: The Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed your request for a traffic consultant for this project. I understand that this consultant would prepare a specific report on the Monterey Terrace site from information contained in the CH2M Hill Report. Any of the consultants mentioned during our meeting of May 18, 1988, are acceptable. The consultants mentioned were: 1. T.P. & E. 2. T.D.A. 3. Joe Savage 4. David Markley 5. The Transpo Group 6. David Hamlin Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, John R. Adamson Program Development Coordinator cc: GaLy Norris, Traffic Engineer vOrriald K. Erickson, Zoning Administrator • • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 CITY OF RENTON IMO& : _;: BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT SWIM Earl Clymer, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director May 18, 1988 Robert W. Thorpe, AICP R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. 1300 Alaska Building Second & Cherry Street Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Monterey Terrace Associates/ERADCO Supplemental EIS Dear Bob: We have reviewed the materials you submitted which were received by us on April 26, 1988. These included a completed copy of the Contract for Services I mailed to you on December 2, 1987, and your working draft of the Supplemental E.I.S. In an initial review of these materials, I noticed that Contract Exhibit A, Scope of Services was missing. I would have called you at that time, but was informed by Jeanette Samek-McKague that you were on holiday for 10 days. Since the Contract for Services was submitted to you last December, the City Attorney has proposed some modifications in language that are not reflected in this earlier version. These changes will need to be incorporated into the Contract before the City will find it acceptable. The major deficiency, however, is the lack of a Scope of Services which, as'you know, is really the blueprint and specifications for the Supplemental E.I.S. Without this, we really cannot properly evaluate the adequacy of the draft materials you submitted pursuant to any agreed upon measure. It has been our hope, since last June when we met with you to discuss this project and the need for a formalization of requirements for the scope of work for the Supplemental E.I.S. and contract administration, that you or your firm would submit such a Scope of Services based upon the identified scoping issues and work elements (draft SEIS, SEIS) to be included in the contract. This was reiterated again in my letter of December 2, 1987 to you and again on January 29, 1988, when you and Mr. Smith met with me. I believe this was also made clear, again, at our meeting on April 14, 1988 with you, at which John Adamson, Ron Nelson, Pat Easter, Penny Tabacco, et al, were in attendance. - Incidentally, Exhibit B - Project Schedule and Exhibit C - Schedule of Payments are for the preparation of an E.I.S. rather than a Supplemental E.I.S. Again there appears to have been an apparent mix-up in the materials that were submitted to us with your letter of August 19, 1988. In order for us to approve and sign the Contract for Services, we will need proper appendices to be resubmitted as soon as possible. I am also enclosing a copy of the City's most recent consultant contract for services for your review. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Robert W. Thorpe May 18, 1988 Page 2 Attached are some general comments on the Draft SEIS you submitted. Again, without a Consultant's Contract (including Scope of Services) we are reluctant to put much time or effort into reviewing this document at this time. If you have any questions, please contact Jeanette Samek-McKague or me. Sincere y, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator Attachments DKE:cs Thorpel DRAFT EIS GENERAL COMMENTS: Basic premises from the 1982 E.I.S. are utilized in this draft S.E.I.S. without documentation that conditions prevailing in that year continue to be valid. This draft lists the 1982 plan as an alternative but does not update discussion of impacts of that option in this document. For example, demographic shifts in the intervening six years may have changed household size or composition, car ownership pattern, etc. Update site maps are necessary. The Summary and many of the specific topic sections in this document do not meet the intent of the City to obtain detailed information concerning impacts and, particularly, plans for mitigation. Examples include: 1) a need for upgrading of public service's is described in conjunction with the ERADCO project, but there is no discussion of the parameters attendant upon that upgrading nor is any effort made to determine how such improvements might be achieved; 2).a commitment is made to provide for on-site recreation spaces and activities, but plans for such amenities are addressed only in the most general terms and are not identified as commitments; 3) an acknowledgement is granted concerning the need for improved arterials adjacent to the site, but there is little discussion of ways by which this objective might be accomplished -- and the applicant continues to support the initial plan for access to the site without documentation concerning the adequacy of that ingress-egress plan. Some of the other sections of the draft are similarly lacking in adequate presentation. It should be emphasized that the above mentioned concerns are based only upon preliminary review. Additional concerns may be raised in a more complete review; similarly, some-of the concerns expressed above may be resolved in a more complete review. Detailed evaluation and comprehensive analysis of adequacy of. the S.E.I.S. cannot be conducted in the absence•of the Scope of Work. / cP CITY . OF RENTON Bal PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Earl Clymer, Mayor Traffic Engineering Division April 7, 1988 b- b� Ms. Penny Tobacco Century 21 Vista Brokers, Inc. 16934 - 116th SE Renton, WA 98055 Subject: Meeting to discuss process for developing "Eradco" site Dear Ms. Tobacco: Thank you for contacting the City about the development of this parcel . At your request I have scheduled a meeting with the principal City officials and you, the property owner and the developer. This meeting is scheduled for 11:00 a.m. on Thursday, April 14, 1988, in the third floor conference room at City Hall . I am looking forward to meeting with you, the property owner and the developer next Thursday. At this meeting we should be able to answer your questions regarding the development of this process. - - • erely, John R. Adamson Program Development Coordinator cc: Mayor Earl Clymer Mike Parness, Administrative Assistant � Wald Nelson, Building and Zoning Director onald Erickson, Zoning Administrator CITY OF RENTON • RCEVED APR 8 1g88 BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2620 w ,._ • r.) 0, 'r-- FE ill''\I; . , _.) _ k._, ,. ii8 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES R.V. i ...�'` a A . ,. RWT ` JP _ Jw . MC FILE THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of April , 1988, by and between the City of Renton, a Washington municipal corporation, (hereinafter called "City") , and R. W. ThoLpe &' Associates• Ten.c. p. Washington Corporation (hereinafter called 10 RWT/A ) . In consideration of the following promises, warranties, and covenants, it is agreed between the parties as follows: 1. Employment of Consultant: The City hereby agrees to employ RWT/A and RWT/A hereby agrees to perform the services hereinafter set forth. RWT/A is employed to produce the described SEPA documents as set forth in Paragraph 2 and Attachment A, Scope of Work. RWT/A is authorized to use CH2M - Hill * as a subconsultant. No other subconsultants shall be employed unless authorized in writing by the City. * (For Traffic & Aquifer Recharge Studies or a suitable alternative subconsultant) Nothing in this contract , shall be construed to create an employee - employer relationship between RWT/A , its employees and the City. 2. Scope of Work: RWT/A shall furnish the necessary equipment, materials and professionally trained and experienced personnel to facilitate completion of the work described in Exhibit A, "Scope of Work, " which is attached hereto, and is incorporated into this agreement as though fully set) forth herein. RWT/A hereby warrants that it has the necessary experience, qualified and trained personnel, equipment and materials to complete the work detailed in Exhibit A, Scope of Work. 3 . Time of Performance: The work detailed in the Scope of Work will be started and completed by RWT/A on the dates specified in Exhibit B, Time Schedule of Completion, attached hereto, and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. It is agreed that all RWT/A services shall be completed and all products shall be delivered by September 1988. 4 . Payment for Services: RWT/A agrees to perform work specified in the Scope of Work and City agrees to pay an amount, subject to conditions set forth in this Contract, not to exceed $ for services rendered in fulfillment of the Scope of Work. Payment of said sum will include payment for all necessary labor, materials, and facilities used in the completion of the "Scope of Work. " Attached as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference is the schedule of payments for the completion of specified work products. 5. Project Manactement: The Project Manager for RWT/A shall be Robert W. Thorpe, ATOP . The Project Manager for the City shall be Don Erickson All correspondence, work orders, payment requests concerning this project shall be directed to these individuals. 6. Warranty of Authority: RWT/A hereby warrants and represents that the person who has executed this contract has full authority from RWT/A to do so. The City hereby warrants that the Mayor and City Clerk of City have full power to execute this contract. 7. Idemnification: RWT/A hereby agrees to idemnify and hold the City of Renton harmless from any and all claims, causes of action, damages and other actions growing out of this consultant's contract or arising under this contract. Including within this indemnification agreement shall be the responsibility of RWT/A to provide legal counsel to ,\ iL 2 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES EXHIBIT B PROJECT SCHEDULE EIS \� Scope of work/contract Deliver Preliminary Draft EIS to City (Complete document) Renton delivers unified (one set) comments to consultant Revised DEIS delivered to Renton Renton approves revisions Print DEIS and deliver to City DEIS issuance/public notice DEIS comments due Begin FEIS preparation Draft FEIS to Renton Renton delivers unified (one set) comments. Revised FEIS to Renton Renton approves FEIS Print FEIS and deliver to City Issue FEIS Appeal Period for FEIS CONTRACT FOR SERVICES EXHIBIT C SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS First Payment: 30% of Contract Amount upon acceptance of Preliminary Draft EIS by City of Renton. Second Payment: 30% of Contract Amount upon acceptance of Draft EIS by City of Renton. Third Payment: 40% of Contract Amount upon acceptance of Final EIS by City of Renton. R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. „` r ' ❑ Planning • Landscape • Environmental ° Economics Principals: Jon Potter ERADCO/MONTEREY TERRACE ASSOCIATES Robert W. Thorpe, AICP Associates: Jennifer Tubb Attachment A-2 Projected Project (SEIS) Costs DEIS - Previous Contracts with ERADCO Contract Expended o WDEIS (Except Traffic/Aquifer) $7 ,000 $7,757 o Services Study/Fiscal Impact $3,500 $4,547 - Remaining SEIS - Includes Aquifer $500 - $600 Traffic from CH2M-Hill Printingl $600 - $800 FEIS $1 ,500 - $3,000 Printing2 $400 - $500 TOTAL - RYE/A - T & M $2,900 - $4,900 Footnote: 1 . Includes Overages on Maximums 2. Estimate - Depends on Number of Copies Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. •2nd&Cherry•Seattle, WA 98104•(206)624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503• 1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage, AK 99501 •(907)276-0005 - ' CONTRACT FOR SERV7 5 PAGE 2 defend any claim, -.action, cause of action or other legal, proceeding brought by any third party to enforce, this contract or, for damages arising out of any alleged lack of performance or negligent performance of this contract. Should RWT/A not retain an attorney to provide said defense, then it hereby agrees to reimburse the City of Renton for any legal fees it has expended in its own defense, together with interest at 10% since such fees were incurred. 8. Legal Fees: If either party hereto shall bring suit to enforce this contract, the prevailing party, as defined by the laws of the State of Washington, shall receive those remedies and costs and attorney fees allowed by law. All lawsuits brought by either party for enforcement of this Contract shall first be brought in the King County, Washington Superior Court. 9. Products of Services: All documents, working documents, notes, maps, drawings, photos, etc. produced by or for ERADCO/Mnt v rPy 'TPrrace ' , in furtherance of this Contract, shall be the property of the City and shall :oe delivered to the City prior to full payment for services under this Contract. 10. Additional Responsibilities: The City shall endeavor to provide RWT/A in a timely manner with all necessary criteria and full information pertinent to the services to be rendered by RWT/A . Further, the City shall endeavor to make available to all information, drawings, maps, specifications in City°s possession which City and RWT/A consider pertinent to Fnvi rnnmenf al Impart Statement Scope of Work. RWT/A agrees to perform the work specified in a timely manner and to complete the work in a form acceptable to the City within the specified budget and time authorized by this Contract. 11. Assignment of Rights: Neither party may assign its rights and obligations under this Contract without the express written consent of the other party. 12. Entire Contract: This agreement, consisting of pages and Exhibits A, B, C constitutes the entire agreement or contract between the parties. The agreements set forth in this contract supersede all prior written or oral understandings. This agreement may not be amended except in writing signed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY and RWT/A have executed this Contract as of the date first set forth above: CITY OF RENTON by Rec: P s ent Zoning Administrator Earl Clymer .Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM Lawrence Warren, City Attorney ti ` CITY OF RENTON "LL BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director December 2, 1987 Robert W. Thorpe, AICP Thorp & Associates, Inc. 1300 Alaska Building 2nd & Cherry Street Seattle, WA 98055 RE: Monterey Terrace - Supplemental EIS Dear Mr. Thorp: I'm sorry for not getting back to you sooner on the Supplemental EIS for Monterey Terrace. Since Centron has still not finalized their plans in terms of a consultant for the McMahon rezone site, I 'm not sure where that leaves things with the Monterey Terrace project. Colin Quinn submitted a list of consultants to us and we have replied with a short list of firms we felt we could work with. I sent them a copy of the city's contract and have not heard back from them yet. Since the City by ordinance is required to publish the DEIS and FEIS, as well as any supplements to it, we will have to have a contract with your firm, assuming ERADCO has made that decision. I would like to set up a meeting with you and our technical steering committee, which will be comprised of myself and representatives from the Department of Policy Development and Department of Public Works, to discuss the scoping issues in greater detail and how time will be allocated towards these in the supplemental EIS. I would also like to discuss the contract, timing, etc. in more detail at such a meeting. You may wish to invite someone in a decision making position from ERADCO to. be there as .well. I would like to set this up as soon as possible. Please review the attached contract and let me know if you have any preferred times in the next week or so. Generally the latter part of the week (Wed. PM, Thurs. or Fri. ) works better for us. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator encl: Draft Consultant Contract • DE: 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 I/rlikR. W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. �0 Planning • Landscape • Environmental • Economics Principals: August 28, 1987 (,'�9 u. ;Tacp F..p,,1•. ,,,� Jon Potter gr `F,.• --- - A r,Lfhl Robert W. Thorpe. AICP J.`1i Associates: Mr. Don Erickson ;} P . (.?ta? Joanne Polayes-Wien Environmental Coordinator d`'�'�t Building Department UC ANL!' :,UNtivt,A JLPC:. City of Renton , City Hall 300 Mill Avenue Renton, WA 98055 RE: Monterey Terrace - Supplemental EIS Dear Don: Enclosed herewith are a summary of the project team, scoping issues and costs for research, writing and printing of the Draft Supplemental EIS on the Monterey Terrace project for ERADCO. Per our discussion, we have agreed to participate on a percentage basis on the aquifer recharge area and the transportation circulation issues by the _elected consult CH2M Hill, for Centron's project. The other issues of earth, land us-eant,, recreation, public services, plants, plans & policies, and other appropriate issues will be handled by our firm in the supplemental EIS for ERADCO's Rezone. a specific project. We have transmitted a copy of our site plan and application to Lloyd Skinner of CH2M Hill and Colin Quinn of Centron for incorporation in their plans and DEIS. IWe are prepared to sign a 3 party agreement based upon the above estimate land scoping issues, as you deem appropriate. Some costs have already been occurred on this project versus the estimate on the Supplemental EIS. Therefore, that would necessarily need to be deducted from the cost estimate for payment by the proponents to the City. Please advise us as to the next step in proceeding with a three party contract and our continuing to work on a Working Draft that is largely complete at this point. Sincerely, R.W. THORPE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ..---:.-"' "--- __ Z CV Robert W. orpe,�/AICP Encl: Qualifications, Cost Estimate cc: Mok Smith, ERADCO Seattle: 1300 Alaska Bldg. • 2nd &Cherry • Seattle, WA 9B104 • [206] 624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503 • 1 1 1 0 West Sixth Avenue • Anchorage, AK 99503 • [907] 276-6646 ,BTAT£ 04 '.4 ANDREA BEATTY RINIKER Director ‘4' 1889 d69 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Mail Stop PV-11 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8711 • (206) 459-6000 July 13, 1987 Mr. Don Erickson vv City of Renton V.-°4 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Erickson: Thank you for the opportunity to comment during the scoping process for the rezone of 41 . 5 acres and construction of a 425 to 625 unit apartment complex proposed by the Environmen- tal Research and Development Corporation (ECF-007-87) . 1 . As noted in the scoping notice, the environmental impact statement should address the potential impacts to water qual- ity. 2. The EIS should also discuss the utilities required for this project . This should include an evaluation of the ca- pacity of the utility and any expansion required to serve the proposed project . If you have any questions, please call me at (206) 459-6025 . Sincerely, Barbara J. Ritchie Environmental Review Section BJR: 3 vi " CITY OF RENTON °'LL r BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director July 2, 1987 Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section Mail Stop PV-11 Olympia, WA 98504-8711 To Whom It May Concern: Transmitted herewith are: A. Copies of Determinations of Significance for the following projects: 1. Sabey Corporation, File Nos. : ECF-034-87. 2. Environmental Research and Development Corporation (ERADCO) ,File Nos. : R-008-87, -ECF-007-87. 3. The Austin Company, File Nos. : SP-113-86, ECF-094-86. B. Copy. of a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated. 1. City of Renton, Parks and Recreation Department (Renton Community Center) , File Nos. : SA-049-87, V-050-87, SM- 009-87. C. Copy of a Determination of Non-Significance: 1. City of Renton, Underground Storage Tank Secondary Containment Ordinance, File No. : ECF-044-87. If you have any questions, please call 235-2540. Sin ly, a Don K. ERic son, AICP Zoning Administrator DKE:JSM:csb:dskl LtDoe • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 4Ib O.. CITY OF RENTON NIMID BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Barbara Y. Shinpoch, Mayor Ronald G. Nelson, Director Robert W. Thorpe, AICP R.W. Thorpe & Associates 1300 Alaska Building 2nd & Cherry Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Rezone Application R-008-87, Environmental Research & Development Co. , Letter of June 18, 1987 Dear Robert: Thank you for your letter of June 18, 1987 which covers many of the things we discussed over the phone earlier in the week. As you indicated to me over the phone ERADCO is not a> interested in pursuing a joint E.I.S. with Centron for the McMahon site next door but would be interested in working jointly on traffic and acquifer related issues. You also are correct in noting that there were other options available to you besides those noted in the letter. Our intent was not to suggest that your only alternatives were to do a joint E.I.S. with Centron, appeal the Committee's Determination of Significance, or withdraw your application. Certainly individual project E.I.S. 's were not intended to ' be excluded as an option. I should also make it clear that the City has no ulterior motive in asking you to do a joint E.I.S. with Centron. Rather, the Environmental Review Committee thought there might be some efficiencies gained by both property owners working on such a document together. Since you already have a draft and final E.I.S. from 1980 you may prefer to do a supplemental E.I.S. for this project focusing on site specific issues such as holding capacity of the site, drainage, soils stability, aesthetics, etc. that reflect changes in your program or new information about the site. In your letter you mention the possibility of doing an expanded environmental checklist or an addendum. Basically, unless this follows an E.I.S. within a period of a year or so we are not inclined to go this route since notification generally isn't required nor are alternatives generally considered, whereas with a supplemental E.I.S.. there typically are. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2540 Robert Thorpe June 30, 1987 Page 2 This department is interested in working with all the parties involved in developing workable solutions for future development up on the hill. To suggest otherwise is a mis- reading of my letter on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee. Since your letter states that you are prepared to proceed with a supplemental E.Y.S. for this project we would like to begin a limited scoping process immediately if that is alright with your client. Also we would like to coordinate with both you and Centron on the work you are sharing on the traffic and aquifer aspects of this project. If you have any questions regarding either the Environmental Review Committee's intent or this letter please let me know. r S . _ /, a—`------- / i Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE: R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc. Planning • Landscape • Environmental • Economics CITY Principals: June 18, 1987 �'6= V ! ( g+� Jon Potter r= i Robert W. Thorpe, AICP v Associates: JN Joanne Polayes-Wien Mr. Don Erickson, AICP • � � .' Zoning Administrator Building and Zone Department B IL {� 7OJlNG DFPT City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S. Renton, WA 98055 RE: Application (R-008-87) -- Environmental Research & Development Co.-- Your Letter of June 3, 1987 Dear Don: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this matter with you recently. I am sorry that I had difficulty in reaching you on several occasions when I called or stopped in to talk with you concerning this matter. As I pointed out, there appears to be some underlying misconceptions raised by your letter concerning the ongoing negotiations between Centron, Eradco, and several other properties surrounding the McMahon site. As indicated to you, we have had ongoing discussions with John Anthony of CH2M Hill and several of the property owners prior to Centron's entering, and very lengthy conversations with Centron since their taking over the McMahon site. We have worked closely together on the road access issues, such as the connection of the Edmonds Street extension down over the hill to Maple Valley highway and aquifer, utility and drainage issues, etc. We have also worked with several other property owners in the area and have met or discussed the matter with every property owner with the exception of the Cougini's, present at the meeting called by Ron Nelson. Thus, we have a history of intent to work closely with other property owners in the area to resolve problems or City concerns, in particular, traffic and circulation concerns. As I indicated to you on the phone, we had agreed after the Ron Nelson meeting to work with CH2M Hill and Centron to provide financial assistance for them to undertake those issues of area wide project significance, such as traffic, the city's aquifer, and potentially some City services. We did agree that because we have a previously adopted draft and final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) of 1980 and previously approved PRD and zoning for the site (which lapsed because of economic conditions), that certain highly site specific issues such as dwelling units, density, aesthetics, and drainage from the site, etc., should be handled in a separate, supplemental EIS submitted by ERADCO to the City, parallel with work being done by Centron via CH2M Hill. We are very comfortable with CH2M Hill and the work efforts they have done to date and have informally agreed to support their traffic and aquifer studies. However, both parties feel that the details of ERADCO's site should be a part of a separate, supplemental EIS. In fact, much of the information that may be appropriate in a supplemental EIS is provided for Seattle: 1 300 Alaska Bldg. • 2nd & Cherry • Seattle, WA 98104 • (206] 624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503 • 1110 West Sixth Avenue • Anchorage, AK 99503 • (907) 276-6B46 r �w Page 2 - Mr. Don Erickson, AICP - 6/18/87 in an expanded environmental checklist, and the options of a mitigated declaration of non-significance or an addendum, as well as a supplement, should be explored by the City, in our opinion. However, we are prepared to proceed with the supplemental EIS, filed on a parallel with Centron's efforts. We do believe that since we have a pending application and that this has been worked out with Centron, that our options are other than your letter states. We do not intend to withdraw our application and loose the fees, nor do we feel its appropriate at this time if you are willing to make a reconsideration to appeal. Absent a letter from you indicating your indication to reconsider this matter, our only alternative would be to appeal, this letter would serve as that intent absent recommendation. As I stated Don, I believe that significant effort has been made by ERADCO, via Mok Smith and myself, with all property owners in the area for over two years and, prior to that, since 1979 with the property owners and residents of Monterey Terrace. We have been operating in the spirit that Ron Nelson 6\ ' intended when he called a joint meeting of all the property owners. We intend to be a leader in this process and work for resolution of joint access concerns, proper road alignment of the extension of Edmonds per the City's design request, and other issues identified by the City. It should be noted, however, that we entered the meeting with Ron Nelson in good faith to cooperate and yomr 1 Pttar_sPPmi to hp ccunter the intent of that meeting. I trust that from this point forward we can work on a cooperative basis and you will realize that it is ERADCO's and R.W. Thorpe & Associate's intent to work with all parties to resolve these issues. We wish to work closely with the City, as we have always done in the past, to mediate complex and differing viewpoints to the benefit of all parties concerned. I look forward to your response on this letter. I trust that my suggestion of us working jointly with Centron on certain aspects of the EIS, with an SEIS covering site specific details being developed through ERADCO's direction, is an appropriate one and consistent with our conversation. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to advise me as to your thinking on this. Respectfullytf' submitted, R.W. 4RPE & CIATES, INC. RobP rt W. Thor , AI cc: Mok Smith, ERADCO Colin Quinn, Centron John Phillips, Attorney - Centron Ron Nelson - Building Superintendent Seattle: Si 5 Seattle Tower• 3rd& University• Seattle. WA 98101 •(206) 624-6239 Anchorage: Suite 503• 1110 West Sixth Avenue•Anchorage.AK 99503• (907) 276-6646 caw rho,. ns.oc uses OF RA,A C = ° "'n O �, 40: BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR z Belt ., rn 0 a MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE.SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 0 235-2540 0,91T4D SEPlE'��P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June 3, 1987 Robert W. Thorpe, AICP R.W. Thorpe & Assoc. Inc. 1300 Alaska Building Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Application (R-008-87) to rezone approximately 41.5 acres of property from G-1 to R-1, R-2, and R-3 to allow a future multiple family PUD consisting of 425- 625 dwelling units. Dear Mr. Thorpe: The Environmental Review Committee considered this property on April 1, 1987, at its regular meeting and decided to issue a Determination of Significance for this project noting conflicts with the City's Comprehensive Plan, major traffic impacts on N.E. 3rd Street, potential impacts on the City's acquifer, probably impacts on City services and infrastructure, and drainage impacts were issued. It was also noted that similar issues had been raised for the proposed McMahon rezone next door. As a consequence, the Committee advised that the applicant should pursue a joint environmental impact statement with the adjacent Centron project (McMahon site) . Before scoping out such a statement or putting together a list of environmental consultants for such a study, we ,would like to hear back from you on whether you would be willing to undertake such a joint impact statement with Centron.. The other option that remains available to you is to either appeal this determination or withdraw your application. I would appreciate hearing back from you at your earliest • convenience so that we can proceed, if you so decide, with consultant selection and scoping for such an Environmental Robert W. Thorpe, AICP Application to Rezone June 3, 1987 Page 2 Impact Statement. Attached is a copy of the consultant selection process we follow. If you have any questions, please contact me or Jeanette Samek-McKague of this office at 235-2540. Sincerely, &c:5,r0 jik --J Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:BG:cb:Dskl LtRThorp slet IUvU of R4,,, " ° BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT RONALD G. NELSON - DIRECTOR �09 coe MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON,WASH. 98055 • 235-2540 • 0,9gTF0 SEPI°4' P BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH MAYOR June 3, 1987 Environmental Research and Development Co. 1800 Pacific Highway South, #1115 Seattle, WA 98188 RE: Application (R-008-87) to rezone approximately 41.5 acres of property from G-1 to R-1, R-2, and R-3 to allow a future multiple family PUD consisting of 425- 625 dwelling units. Gentlemen/Ladies: The Environmental Review Committee considered this property on April 1, 1987, at its regular meeting and decided to issue a Determination of Significance for this project noting conflicts with the City's Comprehensive Plan, major traffic impacts on N.E. 3rd Street, potential impacts on the City's acquifer, probably impacts on City services and infrastructure, and drainage impacts were issued. It was also noted that similar issues had been raised for the proposed McMahon rezone next door. As a consequence, the Committee advised that the applicant should pursue a joint environmental impact statement with the adjacent Centron project (McMahon site) . Before scoping out such a statement or putting together a list of environmental consultants for such a study, we would like to hear back from you on whether you would be willing to undertake such a joint impact statement with Centron. The other option that remains available to you is to either appeal this determination or withdraw your application. I would appreciate hearing back from you at your earliest convenience so that we can proceed, if you so decide, with consultant selection and scoping for such an Environmental Impact Statement. Attached is a copy of the consultant selection process we follow. Environmental Research and Development Co. Application to Rezone June 3 , 1987 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact me or Jeanette Samek-McKague of this office at 235-2540. Sincerely, acryia Donald K. Erickson, AICP Zoning Administrator DE:BG:cb:Dsk1 LrEnvirCo • Public Notice NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WA The Environmental Review Committee (ERC)has issued a Determination of Signif- icance De Jo i e icance for the following projects: ,being first duly sworn on oath states SABEY CORPORATION that he/she is the Chief Clerk of the Application for early environmental` assessment of a project to develop 500,000 sq. ft. of a mixed use commercial retail VALLEY DAILY NEWS park o nt n a M-P, manufacturingS.W. 4 park zone. Property bounded by S.W. 34th •• St. on the north, East Valley Road on the Kent EditionRenton Edition • Auburn Edition east, S.W. 41st Street on the south, and , Lind Avenue S.W. on the west. File No.: Daily newspapers published six (6) times a week.That said newspapers ECF-034-87. are legal newspapers and are now and have been for more than six ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERAD- months prior to the date of publication referred to,printed and published CO)(MONTEREY TERRACE) in the English language continually as daily newspapers in Kent, King Application to rezone 41.5 acres of prop- County,Washington.The Valley Daily News has been approved as a legal erty from G-1 to R-1, R-2, and R-3 for a multi-family planned unit development hav- newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the State of Washington for ing between 425-625 housing units. Proper- King County. ty located north of Maple Valley Highway, east of 1-405, and south of N.E. 3rd Street, the Monterey Terrace subdivision, and the The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the Kent Edition Mt.Olivet Cemetery.File Nos.: ECF-007-87 • , Renton Edition X , Auburn Edition and(and not in T THEE AUSTIN COMPANY supplement form) which was regularly distributed to its subscribers Application for special permit to allow during the below stated period.The annexed notice a the fill and grading of 171,400 cubic yards of material on 11.62 acres of property. Notice or Environmental Determination Property located south of S.W. 19th Street, North of S.W.21st Street and West of East was published on June Ci}, 1987 R2365 • Valley Road. Army Corps of Engineers has said they have jurisdiction over whole site. File Nos.:ECF-094-86 and SP-113-86. Further information regarding this action ; is available in the Building and Zoning The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the Department, Municipal Building, Renton, , sum of $ 36.90 Washington, 235-2550. Agencies, affected tribes and members of the public are invit- ed to comment on the scope of the EIS. Comments must be submitted to the City of Renton by 5:00 p.m.on July 15, 1987. Any of the ERC filed with the(Renton Hearing tExaminer by 5:00 p.m.,July 8, 1987. ti Published in the Valley Daily News June Subscribed and sworn to before m this26 t h day of June 19l 24,1987.R2365k _, 'IN Not Not Public for the State of Washington, residing at Federal Way, King County, Washington. 1 , VDN#87 Revised 11,86 rr'• ;i • • . KEPT CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON SCOPE OF EIS FILE NUMBER(S) : ECF-007-87, R-008-87 • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Application to rezone approximately 41. 5acres of property from G-1(General) to R-1(Residential-Single Family,R- 2 ,Residential two family and R-3 ,Residential multiple family for a future multi family planned unit development with 425 to 625 dwelling units. r` PROPONENT: Environmental Research and Development Corporation ' (ERADCO) LOCATION OF PROPOSAL:located north of Maple Valley Highway, east of I- 405 and south of NE 3rd St. and the Monterey Terrace subdivision and Mt. Olivet Cemetery. EIS REQUIRED. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43 .21C. 030(2) (c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. LEAD AGENCY: Environmental Review Committee, City of Renton The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion in the .':.. EIS: earth, water, land use, recreation, transportation, public services and plants. SCOPING: Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, probable significant, adverse impacts, and licenses or other approvals that may be required. Your comments must be submitted in writing and received before July 15, 1987. Responsible Official: Environmental Review Committee % Don Erickson, Zoning Administrator Building & Zoning Department 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, Wa. 98055 APPEAL: You may appeal this determination of significance in writing ' pursuant to RMC 4-3016 accompanied by a $75. 00 appeal fee no later than 5: 00 p.m. July 8, 1987, to: Renton Hearing Examiner % City Clerk 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055 You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the above office to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. PUBLICATION DATE: June 24, 1987 DATE OF DECISION: SIGNATURES: c"ets4w-e-e-e,- R na d G. Nelson Larry . Springer Building and Zoning Director Policy Development Director Ri hard CJ Houghton Public Works Director P5-005 1/1 Transamerica Title Insurance Co CITY OF RENTON A Service of � C-$Transamerica Corporation 1 ` 11 Date January 5 , 1986 � I 7 . FEB04 198 Please direct correspondence to: BUILD1NCJZUNIN(i DEPT. 320 108t Avenue N.E. r ADDRESS DDRESS Bellevue, WA 98009 Eradco CITY STATE ZIP CODE 18000 Pacific Hwy South, #1115 Seattle, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 451-7301 Attn: Mok Smith - Order No. : 856141 REZONE CERTIFICATE Charge: $ 3 0 0. 0 0 Sales Tax $2 4 .3 0 Total $324 . 30 Certificate dated as of December 30 , 19 8 6 at 8:30 A.M. covering the property hereinafter described. This certificate is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction affecting title to said property. It is restricted to the use of the addressee for the purpose of rezoning Upon request within 60 days, this certificate will be extended to include the filing of any complaint and notice of Lis Pendens. Title is vested in RIVERWOOD LAND CORPORATION, a Washington corporation subject to the exceptions shown herein. DESCRIPTION: - see attached pages 8 and 9 - EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights of parties in possession and claims that may be asserted under unrecorded instruments, if any. - continued - ga Page 2 Order No. 856141 2. D. General taxes , as follows , together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure cost , if any, after delinquency: (1st half delinquent on May 1 ; 2nd half delinquent on November 1) Tax Account No. Year Amount Billed Amount Paid Principal Balance 172305-9109-00 1986 $1, 558. 04 $ . 00 $1, 558 . 04 1987 Not Available (Covers portion lying within the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4) 172305-9003-07 1986 $ 215 . 64 $ . 00 $ 215 . 64 1987 Not Available (Covers portion lying within the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4) 172305-9025-01 1985 $5, 663 . 15 $ . 00 $5 , 663 . 15 1986 $5 , 685 . 71 $ . 00 $5 , 685 . 71 1987 Not Available (Covers portion lying within Government Lots 7 and 8) NOTE: 1987 taxes are a lien, but not payable before February 15, 1987 . The levy code for the property herein described is 2100 for 1987 . 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Puget Sound Power & Light Company PURPOSE: Right to install , -use and maintain guy wires and anchors AREA AFFECTED: , A right of way 10 feet in -width having 5 feet of such width on each side of the following described centerline in the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 in Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East W.M. . Beginning at a point on the Northeasterly margin of SR 169 (as indicated on Sheet 3 of 6 of the Washington State Highway Plan, Renton-Maplewood to Junction SR 405 , approved February 18 , 1971) 165 feet Northwesterly from its intersection with the South line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 ; thence Northeast at right angle to said Northeasterly margin 30 feet to the terminus of said centerline RECORDED: May 16 , 1974 RECORDING NO. : 7405160470 - continued - Page 3 Order No. 856141 4 . EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 8001240812 PURPOSE: For parking vehicles AREA AFFECTED: That portion of Government Lots 7 and 8 AND the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 in Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 6 East W.M. , described as follows : Beginning at the East 1/4 corner of said Section 17 ; thence North 89°45 ' 17" West along the East-West centerline thereof a distance of 1, 655 . 1 feet to the true point of beginning of the herein described tract ; thence North 50°23 ' 23" West a distance of 123 . 12 feet; thence South 48°40' 38" West a distance of 23 . 42 feet to the Northeasterly margin of the Renton- Maple Valley Highway (SR 169) ; thence South 42'01 ' 45" East along said Northeasterly margin a distance of 514 . 01 feet; thence North 47°53 ' 41" East a distance of 38. 54 feet; thence North 33°07 ' 59" West a distance of 201. 36 feet; thence North 50°23 ' 23" West a distance of 194. 00 feet to the true point of beginning 5 . Restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on May 16, 1972 , under Recording No . 7205160513 , as follows : No building or structure, with the exception of detached single family residential structures , shall be located or constructed within 100 feet of the Southerly property line of the H.G. White Monterey Terrace Addition to the City of Renton, as per plat recorded in Volume 50 of Plats , Page 35 , records of King County. Such area shall be maintained continuously in a neat and clean manner. If not so maintained, the City of Renton shall have the option to assume responsibility for such maintenance and shall bill the property owners for the cost thereof. If unpaid for more than 60 days , such bill shall become a lien against the property. - continued - Page 4 Order No. 856141. 6. Restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on March 1 , 1977 , under Recording No. 7703010782. 7 . AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: Environmental Research and Development Corporation, Inc. AND: Kent Highlands , Inc. DATED: November 19 , 1979 RECORDED: January 27, 1984 RECORDING NO. : 8401270658 REGARDING: To exchange and convey to Kent Highlands the property described herein 8 . CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: SELLER: Kent Highlands , Inc. , formerly Stoneway Concrete, Inc . , a Washington corporation PURCHASER: Environmental Research and Development Corporation, Inc. , a Washington corporation, a general partner for Monterey Terrace Associates , a Washington limited partnership COLLECTION AT: --- DATED: January 22, 1980 RECORDED: January 24 , 1980 RECORDING NO. : 8001240812 (E# 0577028) Said contract has been amended by instrument recorded August 14 , 1981 under Recording No. 8108140730 . Seller' s interest assigned to Riverwood Land Corporation, a Washington corporation, by instrument recorded April 25 , 1985 under Recording No. 8504250890 . (ElI 577028) - continued - Page 5 Order No. 856141 9 . JUDGMENT: AGAINST: Monterey Terrace Associates , a limited partnership; Environmental Research and Development Company, Inc. , also known as ERADCO, a Washington corporation, its general partner; Voldal Wartelle & Company; United States of America (Internal Revenue Service) ; and all other persons or parties unknown claiming any right, title, estate, liens or interest in the real estate described in the complaint IN FAVOR OF: Jack McCann Co. , Inc . , a Washington corporation FOR: $90, 090 . 12, with interest from September 1, 1984 at prime rate charged by Seattle-First National Bank plus 3% compounded monthly, together with costs herein, in amount of $750. 00, and attorney fees in sum of $6, 500 . 00 ENTERED: May 20, 1986 KING COUNTY JUDGMENT NO. : 86-9-07225-5 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. : 84-2-13476-3 ATTORNEY FOR CREDITOR: Richard C. Conrad (Deed of Trust foreclosed) (Judgment summary shows : Judgment debtors : Monterey Terrace Associates Environmental Research and Development Corporation) EXECUTION ISSUED AND LEVY MADE : DATE: January 9 , 1986 RECORDING NO. : 8601095002 - continued - Page 6 Order No. 856141 10. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Monterey Terrace Associates , a Washington limited partnership, by Environmental Research and Development Corporation, its general partner TRUSTEE: First American Title Insurance Company, a corporation BENEFICIARY: Voldal, Wartelle & Company LOAN NO. : --- BRANCH: --- ADDRESS : c/o Breskin, Robbins , Bastian & Cohen Ninth Floor, Hoge Building Seattle, WA 98104 ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $2, 629 . 00 DATED: November 30 , 1982 RECORDED: January 24 , 1983 RECORDING NO. : 8301240853 11 . JUDGMENT: AGAINST: Monterey Terrace Associates , Inc. , et al IN FAVOR OF: Richard C. Conrad FOR: $500 . 00 ENTERED: March 8, 1985 KING COUNTY JUDGMENT NO. : 85-9-03185-2 SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. : 84-2-13476-3 ATTORNEY FOR CREDITOR: Richard C. Conrad 12. Pending action in King County Superior Court Cause No . 84-2-06821-3 being an action for forfeiture of Real Estate Contract recorded under Recording No. 8001240812, and amended by instrument recorded under Recording No. 8405180910. PLAINTIFF: Kent Highlands DEFENDANT: Environmental Research & Development Corporation, et al . ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF: Terry E. Thomson Lis Pendens thereof recorded on May 15, 1984 under Recording No. 8405150809 . - continued - Page 7 Order No. 856141 NOTE 1 : This report is made for the purpose herein specified, and liability is limited to the amount paid therefor. NOTE 2 : Assessed Valuation: Land $138, 000. 00 Improvements --- (Covers portion lying within the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4) Land $19 , 100. 00 Improvements --- (Covers portion lying within the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4) , Land $503, 600 . 00 Improvements --- (Covers portion lying within Government Lots 7 and 8 TRANSAME'� C/ ITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY Aft Title Officer For , J''vic- on th' = order, call : 51-7314 Jed aw on, . -d DeWolf or Darci Dodso, JK/ga ENCLOSURES : Sketch Paragraphs 3 through 8 , 10 • Page 8 Order No. 856141 DESCRIPTION : ALL that portion of the Northeast 1/4 and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. , described as follows : Beginning at the Southwest corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 17 ; thence North along the West line of said subdivision a distance of 252. 23 feet to the true point of beginning, said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence South 89°45' 17" East a distance of 526. 41 feet; thence South 88°52' 04" East a distance of 799 feet to the East line of Section 17 ; thence South along said East line to the East 1/4 corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing South along the East line of said section to an intersection with the Northerly right-of-way line of State Road No. 5 (St. S.R. #169) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general Northwesterly direction along said Northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies North 89°45 ' 17" West a distance of 653. 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence South 89°45' 17" East a distance of 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning; TOGETHER WITH an easement for road and utility purposes over, across and along the following described tract : A strip of land 100 feet in width, the Westerly margin of which is the Westerly line of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company, right-of-way and described as follows : Beginning at the Southeast corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M. ; thence North O1°07 ' 56" East along the East line of said subdivision 115 feet; thence North 89°36 ' 24" West 86. 83 feet to the East line of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company right-of-way; thence North 26°38 ' 54" West along said East line 235 . 23 feet to the South margin of N.E. 3rd Street; thence South 71°49' 00" West along said South margin of N.E. 3rd Street 203. 82 feet to the West line of said Puget Sound Power and light Company right-of-way and the true point of beginning; thence South 26°38' 54" East along said West line 450 feet; thence North 63°21' 06" East 100 feet; thence North 26°38' 54" West 435 feet, more or less , to the South margin of Northeast 3rd Street; thence South 71°49' 00" West along said South margin to the true point of beginning; -continued- Page 9 Order No. 856141 "DESCRIPTION (continued) : TOGETHER WITH a permanent easement and right-of-way for ingress , egress and utilities with necessary appurtenances described as a strip of land 60 feet and width, the Easterly margin of which is to lie 1 foot within the Easterly margin of American Memorial Services , Inc. , property and described as follows : A strip of land 60 feet in width over and across a portion of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East , W.M. , more particularly described as follows : Beginning at the intersection of the Southwesterly margin of the Puget Sound Power and Light Company right-of-way with the. North line of said subdivision; thence South 26°38' 54" East along said Southwesterly margin a distance of 501. 26 feet; thence South 6°54' 11" East continuing along said Southwesterly margin a distance of 138. 25 feet to the East line of said subdivision; thence South 1°07 ' 56" West along said East line a distance of 543. 67 feet; thence North 88°52 ' 04" West a distance of 60. 00 feet; thence North 1°07 ' 56" East parallel to the distant 60. 00 feet from the East line of said subdivision a distance of 539. 46 feet; thence North 6°54' 11" West parallel to and 60. 00 feet distant from said Southwesterly margin a distance of 123 . 69 feet; thence North 26°38' 54" West continuing parallel with and 60. 00 feet distant from said Southwesterly margin a distance of 490. 82 feet; thence North 63°21' 06" East a distance of 60. 00 feet to the point of beginning; Situate in the City of Renton, County of King, State of Washington. • Form No.W-AK-555 (Previouw Form No.80R) ORDER NO. Ano141 ESCROW NO. LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR VTN 14E 14 4 GOVERNMENT PLAT MAP Vol PG LOTS 7 AND 8 5EC /7, T�✓✓/Y 23 N, RNNSE W'41 - �u cP �e sel_ anz.2. • • 5E17-45•/7E 526.f/ seta-52-Of E �9' I M, f •, • r • • N)104. fr • qi/ • • This map does not purport to show all highways , roads or easements affecting Form No.W-AK-555 • (Previous Form No.9OR) ORDER NO. 5(0141 ESCROW..NO. LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG 7TN IAEA. c GOVERNMENT LOTS 7AND8 SEC 17 , 7141112 3 N , m&5E 1,01 . sat-fs-/7E • • • • • • • • • '23, • • • • • This map does not purport to show all highways , roads or easements affecting said property: no liability is assumed for variations in dimensions and location. Form No.W-AK-555 4!Paavioua form No.8019 ORDER NO. fl51o14\ ESCROW NO. ' LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vol PG ITN NE 4 GOVERNI'1ENr LOTS 7 AND 8 SEC 17 , 711/N23N, RN& 5E Wft • • a , .032. \ 2 \y �\ $ s a \ \ .t. i ..8s' • \ \ \\ \ \,i Oi N 11 �I 1� SIP. II II I 31 `J.I Z Irk 11. -II II �rei This map does not purport to show A higliw ys , roads or easements affecting • a Ia { 0 1.1 0 'rtM� . ,'�} °'F'c, M -✓.,y y ;.Ye J'y 1N ?:f•.6 1, $ I a , „at ,. ..k e2jy 1• APPLICATION NO- ECF-007-87 • & R-008-87 APPLICANT ERADCO (MONTEREY TERRACE) _PROPOSED C I APPLICATION TO REZONE 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G- TO K 1 -1, R-3 OR .A MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425-625 HOUSING UNITS. GENERAL LOCATION AND/OR ADDRESS PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HWY. & SOUTH OF N.E. 3RD ST., THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION & THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY, POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRON ENTAIL ACTION. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (E.R.C.) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION a / DOES DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT 1:11;1 WILL WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. THE CITY OF RENTON WILL NOT ACT ON THIS PROPOSAL FOR 15 DAYS FROM THE DATE BELOW. COMMENTS MUST BE RECEIVED BY - AN APPEAL OF THE ABOVE DETERMINATION MAY BE FILED WITH jvf AEFON HEARING EXAMINER BY 5:00 P.M., FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION. I i _ IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW 5 7( p,eProve tionDBur eu UI�C CSC n�'7r lJ REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fir-e_. DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH- 4,-1987 ECF - 007 — 87 FEB i 8 1987 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-008-87 041. ►A PROPONENT: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI—FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 & R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI—FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 — 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. •3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 1/ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: OATV OF RENTON Fir) 117: (r:, lit_. , I] V :)) L 1 FEB 181987 1 L [3LIWLDNG /ZONING DEPT. RECOMMENDATION: DNS 0 MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: /` TITLE: - e. DATE: _ /if; /9f,7 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT^9 BUILDING & ZONING DEPP_ QTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE : MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2&..R-3 iOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO : PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION r1TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : OUTILITIES ENG . DIVISION © FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Ell BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT Ell POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MARCH 4,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : APPROVED BAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS El NOT APPROVED CSTY OF RENTON 11 FEB 1.81987 BUILDI'vG / ZONING DEPT. DATE : /9/yf 7 SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 • • VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pc r KS DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 4,1987 ECF - 007 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 & "R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN '425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. '3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water tnry c F RENT ON a 4) Plants �i"-', �� v UvL 5) Animals ; .) lriD i V7 j 6) Energy and Natural Resources1111 7) Environmental Health �t@. �' nF°T. 8) Land and Shoreline Use ��p�� s� ��r�.. 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics X 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation vv 14) Transportation 4/o'i -.,0 4, 0rv:2•&Ge 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: ' / / 1.' loff o�! ' ".' !'�!®�G ' '' /&ea//'0,04- leak �/. 1/4/e40/07Cd17L Spec r-j l c 4,e will Weed 71 '6e 7t-4/46 cam„ •��- Th e /40)45,et,e 4.1 6/ 04,-G46'7e C f u k /he ,ro`BG74 'A /i7JS're �e1%l /i✓�' envr're del eif e /.1194 b ti>` 744 the ah 6 a,CiC �/i1e eWe •css71/ct / gee- ' 47/ ® /7 'mil!'Lj /lie',,- a,-e Ma/or o f? and G/ice f'/re re''Coal T r Sr a/c w oved- 7 lie e r-!/ h a61 e Lep A 676 o freo /e. Gf7 sc* f�cr#d/rez /4eed 7�6e- Y dsd ve 14dei. RECOMMENDATION: DNS al MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: r%d4n /r`drr/1 TITLE: /7//cO Coa/d, 4,- DATE: �lliZ� '/ l9f FORM #14 /Ce. Gl /Ce.t.fr eJe, [,tom ' e/l /o' ( 7 ppU,D TISED 9/10/85 044/-11C rfr)/ /`r -Cc' `ieel(Lryf i' adain-zr 7`h o(JC6 II it ppi II • 4 li ae‘a 6 a'a Ode GIo -2 r!7/e N0,1- 17)d sY-2ede 7‘'-ee4:-!�®.T2�/g : n C0 preh� /iU e- ea/eV/P••Zti z',d hl29c,l9 C/ w/a. if s'yf/8!-n, nit' h he o%L%,,a. Hai the art;e, -1 f ih c,..,01 7t.4ke rnA the miery1*/ Syr/ems „-o.l ' " fdia7 171 / .ryf� < / C '#1#7CL7 fws /-awh eh /ha/dr •.1.!Gd/. ,al1f'4i r- • RENT'G BUILDING & ZONING DEN' ®TEENY DEVELOPMENT APPLUCATIO 'REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE : MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO.REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R=I, R-2& R-3 tOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO : ❑ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ❑ ENGINEERING DIVISION ri TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : J-TUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION r-] FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CITY OF RENTO Ec PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ' DE C �' " 7 1 Ell BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT ID 0-1-'O\9B7 n POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY DEVEL E B6JO�.D14 G / ZONING DEPT. n OPM NT DEPARTMENT D OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON MARCH 4,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : /66Atr •71 rih /ow147IAZ// a'a /,p.W.,377L n APPROVED APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Eil NOT APPROVED /1 ref/ ��� , ce cW«Pf - the sr ire i`,l ez(Ieg s �e Vb e 'ate %J D9aiiLin&I7, 72 /r/e ` /4/!1Qry Cev7411•)zlok,.f 1J7 / homed ,Ye a4/a/ivyJeG( awe the 1) 14 cow epfu p( , _ ret').dee-e 10.c,1.((e k.qr s 540, w`K 'lie ,re IQ-41 12.e4cems- ` to re iCdedc c1 el cal, + p e Crce (a&, el eca,e., ' Z) s u-`"1-{-e tI4fAkeq cLL expla,c K ci4,tr r- tf, -e• 0 w,k e, p,�- e e �� �C4-l"at GO s,r,,p 0. eK., DATE : //4140 �in ) SIGNATURE F DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED / REPRESENTATIVE SCry'ociJ le !/'G{G°rQ/-/'ohm !/1u (% Q f.� ' REVISION 5/1982 1'�l .Sci-e Cam. aGG 6 L -A4°. 0 QG "� IA-Lo re 1,eU e.�rm 18 2 ��• Of^e cIi1,L�uaC, • I L .•. . . . . " 1 . . • „ • • s . s . . ei) t'a4160./ 4( he'?" tt.,141eAt, ....564=48.01301 --e-Afisawklar is'- , the /7 ofri io2e)4 -/ e6( ecrc 4,/a :1774 if 74"7i5 j;4 to.) k010.Aoll‘e I 41.11 14-wl Aee lie #249A0-/Le/ /04-- • WIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW : :T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fuilrlir-xl DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 4,1987 ECF - 007 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT-: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 & R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41. 5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air s/ 3) Water 4) Plants / 5) Animals / 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use �. / 9) Housing s� 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation t-' 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 7,1_011)/AT C 6 G .1) 1 I-5- 4 rl- /IA-J(e- 0 -stC)GG'J " -- C7- p�J -S /4 /3, /JGUS 1'aC1p`y-'C1 ,�.> (?c -t)D, 6 /�GZ 6'oJ Ja f RECOMMENDATION: El DNS n MITIGATED DNS f EIS REVIEWED BY: �� Ci TITLE: DATE: _ . —4 -P-i? FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT-7 BUILDING & ZONING DEPP-MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE : MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE .APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2&.R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO : ® PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT © BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 0 POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MARCH 4,198.7 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : C7�/� a n APPROVED j9 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS NOT APPROVED 411* /rur C (O/u DATE: '_6 SIGNATURE IRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 L..._RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Trc . 'c Ern DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 4,1987 ECF - 007 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(s). .REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 & .R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. '3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41. 5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air �--' 3) Water C---- 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health e'' 8) Land and Shoreline Use E—9) Housing " 10) Aesthetics �-- 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation G-- 14) Transportation v� 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTS: Nec.C[ r 19--A 4.:. A ,S I v V✓\ C7 Y `• 1 by-t", �e �1 O a lz A-t s e.D .z,, eL I--0 S h o kJ k C 5 i s -E:- d o co V r 52 ? M C i cj a.+ l U I-i 1N7-e i o 2 fit, e kb- ,-1.2 _� 1VL1r c-fr // / �i uLi %•t'r.^•7 u? /oLJram .. r RECOMMENDATION: DNS Q MITIGATED DNS n EIS �//,, CITY OF RENTON REVIEWED BY: CE ITLE: .. r - c r 1 \/ F ITA DATE: -��/2/6) 7 MAR 16 ig$7 FO V. #14 pilot nine+`_ /7nimit i T*./10/85 RENTC BUILDING & ZONING DEPAr—RENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION! REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE : MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO.REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R_1, R-2& R-3 .OR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO : I ] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ® ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ] UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 0 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT El BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT CITY OF Fr ON POLICE D REPeg � DEPARTMENT MAR 161��� n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I I OTHERS : BUILDING / ZONING DE PT. COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MARCH 4,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 7;Z /A 6EsE/ef/, l iAPPROVED n APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS f/. NO- APPROVED i pa c* A v) . .1 s Zo Neect 1N1bve-. l rov-1,v,61_+! 01 ` C Ge SS Roa,c/ ±b e-- HilkL- \A) H C CLS Co L-1 e-e--+ -fn Ea c,,,,01,;_cd 5 V::;4' 1\1 f' ! o L� ly/ 2 Sri-�S �cYi � �j e Cl" -/'1""1 / z o/ J DATE : 15�� ''N/- lURE OF .DIRECT R OR AUTHO ZED REPRE ENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIE[- ---EET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: � -7jarunq DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 4,1987 ECF - 007 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 & .R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41. 5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources >‹ 7) Environmental Health 8) Landnd Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare �-- 12) Recreation X, 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services xr 16) Utilities COMMENTS: • .Th )?)6d swop 5 tA 6)E,c1 Retort-6 roi u�9f iiul uu 1-Phu 5/ iul g/( c) /ip -c1 7b ;d. Corhm uru/r7'J eivudbrOthu0116 66m iu-I' 619n ypi bRiuD Use > / JOO5// 1 1 ,c13 Th1fOnu %AI9,,65pCh7 /OAJ 4 Paa,l6,) 5 V2uec s s/-fouu0 6i6 'Amit.,-Rta,e Ito Pui,_( f& -yb ii Pki u r M Ri,661/c 36c i? i Icao ,, i4 Sp/nu& 6hs, RECOMMENDATION: ri DNS [_] MITIGATED DNS EIS REVIEWED BY: Ni ,QJN_A LJVv-1, TITLE: DATE: 2 (2 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENTAN BUILDING & ZONING DEV TMENT :. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE : MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2&..R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO : [1] PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE OENGINEERING DIVISION F-1 TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ' '� UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU OPARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT E„BUILDING & ONIN DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON MARCH 4,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : El APPROVED fiAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS 0 NOT APPROVED boa) (.,p'1OQ U5� tiPlierz `I/m v r)08_ MUIA0/0 , iZeUitc), _ _ -----------------u--- --_ -- - --- - - -= DATE : •'ATU OP DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 1VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW :T REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Po\►c.e_ DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 4,1987 • ECF - 007 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES \OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 & R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN '425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41. 5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities COMMENTSf/: Co�- ,--le .-. , ( 7.7.,... ... ---e:=z --e-e----/--,- -/V--- /---t--e7-e --- 9:6,--- &,- ..__e =e-=, ./ CITY OF RENTON tv,A;, 41997 J RECOMMENDATION: El DNS MITIGATED DNBUILDING / ZOFgG RaIui7. REVIEWED BY• P C:Gr�iyl TITLE:_e' DATE: 3-- --f FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPAIDTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FIEVIE 'Ga SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : ' REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE : MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R=1, R-2& R-3 rOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO : Ell PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU l l PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT • ® I CCU R O M I "� E POLICE DEPARTMENT MiAi` 4'gg/ J POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BUILDING / ZONING DEPT. OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M, ON MARCH 4,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : % \� OAPPROVED /171.byPROVED WITH CO ITIONS ONOT APPROVED 3-�.-�-7 Pale, /mSct L4 , C� I . Fez-c7►F7 S CE9 LiCs,v-V► s f� arc itt_QIOL fie�* c L. U' _ w Ser-k-©ct, ce ACc,pv S 04.0 oh1� ha.UI,t.e_ 0 E LaCCesS. su ces�- Gortv,� � 5 ?itt c iti--, to ec btiw��Q� �e. t.a►v JfJLGa6T restcteta- - & LAI. cccccSs o2L44 eC;.NvAec_T-I►,i.. 6Le I.t..e. --(Lc tc2 v o e(DS eck OAF e C ©tom .OL Lu ( p vvyk.dre acceSS u' bay CAI'a CtS . . (Mr v� g �o L./U )Q a.pr vcav�cv DATE : SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 VIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW S 1 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Pr)Itc.j DeA l.e.Ics,epne r ', DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 4aV 7 OF RENTON ECF _ 007 _ 87 r E.B 1 B 1987 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-008-87 POLICY PROPONENT: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) aviiktwincrefFwr PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 &-R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN''425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF;.N.E.' 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth CITY OF RENTON /TON � ✓ 4 2) Air 5 [EwEgvE - ✓ 3) Water NIL '1987 i ✓ 1/ 2.4) Plants ✓ 5) Animals BUILDING / 70NING DEPT. ✓ 6) Energy and Natural Resources ✓ V 3 7) Environmental Health ✓ 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing ✓ 4 10) Aesthetics ✓ 11) Light and Glare ✓ ` 12) Recreation ✓. ✓ S 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation ✓ 4/ (o 15) Public Services ✓ 1/ 1' 16) Utilities ✓ COMMENTS: Z. . re,:fr4-454-9-44.dret tAxed-tA atj.t.tAtZt..m.? 124-044,-. "et-ixu.2-44. Lt- /YU-.4..".41.4.A.A1-41xtiAtc FA-4tCetr:tt3aL1L= r2-. . itAMA eti tAzttk"2-1"-jalt. ..� 6 l� Ltno A-AziA44..e./ 5 . tII:4eSi. liwt-t. 4.X.C.A.L..eil-A-alA U �c.-� c- .* I I t`�-v — I b 7 (O. ut0.04-0Mt A-At, 1.44.. inn , ,f._ outito an, RECOMMENDATION: . El DNr16. 0 MITIGATED'DNS XEIS REVIEWED B (dr ITLE: kdAttibtA4-4talt DAT I V13 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT" BUILDING & ZONING DEP!. --MENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE ; MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF. PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R=I, R-2&_R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAKILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO: • El PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : • Ei ENGINEERING DIVISION I ( TRAFFIC ENG . DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ! UTILITIES ENG . DIVISION FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU El PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF RENTON BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT U [ © 1 O M E":) u � 1 POLICE DEPARTMENT MAID ,S1987 J UPOLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT BIDING /Z BUILDING ONING DEPT. 00THERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING . PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P .M. ON MARCH '4,1987 .. REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; f El APPROVED 111 APPROVED WITH ONDITIONS � NOT APPROVED ati rirOcorsa V et, MALtitA"-Z-AA-C. - asr=4.4.4 • 44....d.;€4. kAt VL-45.1*-12-A- tAt ovt.. / z) / 1 14 , 3) rnist-e-Ao-avt-toDL/o d4) , )) A.Xti'y E.c w) � ) ) /Lem -a-G-�,': -a a-- ) tea) 1==_Adhf-4-cv14-- .°)� Oc Jd #J aJL4 /A DATE; SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR OR AUTHORIZED RE RESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 IVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW I REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: LI-I-&i-ke.S DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 4,1987 ECF - 007 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 & R-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health . 8) Land and Shoreline Use 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation 14) Transportation 15) Public Services 16) Utilities _ COMMENTS: NGCO 14102E INFO writ' RGG S Tm uwot is i*I'i 1NI57 u,A7ropJS 45 t)a AL_ A-S atataveeA= PAificitAr5 BCCAus1- Pa03c-c7 15 Locx`co ski AQcrAk iL PItcrralr0Ai A2[;A , r:`--‘-.E, er-- [l V L-- \`\ ,, ,,., ,,k7_0,,,-,_2,,, ,o..1.-for,N_ tio-' , 121 � • n - \C\. -..1-: ' rt���� j� r,;�. / 70N1N , DEPT. RECOMMENDATION: Ej DNS r- /MITIGATED DNS n EIS REVIEWED BY: TITLE: (AiLir Ay IsiGhfrn. DATE: Al) /87 FORM #14 REVISED 9/10/85 RENT^N BUILDING & ZONING DEP " "TMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELUPM1NT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE : MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2& R-3 rOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : - nUTILITIES ENG , DIVISION / _' ` „ ,r-,; r_, ctrVT01y 1 - ,_: 1.47: D 1� j P1 1 n FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU - 1 I PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 241•i n BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT iG � n� � i gt. n POLICE DEPARTMENT t\:..... n POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PRO IDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M , ON MARCH 4,1987 , REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION : 0 /LIT/ ►EA/4.-/ lff,L="41 n APPROVED EJAPPROVED WITH CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED RcZVNG caw. Noi&: 10 AQuak* ptiv c ito I A4 4 , (UTILITY APPROVAL SUBJECT TO( MIAS7 F4l1/C/A1G I011O ..T ON ,4QuAi Ell.. , LATE MMUS AGREEMENT-WATER MO _ LATE�AGREEMENT-SEWER TO /W4j- )' ?oor /3_80/f �.Fs M-Loy � SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-WATER _)44s' /7c£°/Oz..awe X im iv 9g a S °o SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE-SEWER 00 n �� �J .• •% o n ,yes , its._ �,-sY �'• �� ��I�-•'i� �, as: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-WATER j/ '-' �_; �r j e �1 OD SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AREA CHARGE-SEWER ' ' ,�-" _ 0 4-f/ 2SD• APPROVED WATER PLAN y/,ES C7 4� 'APPROVED SEWER PLAN �/ • ,�! - L _ tt ;� f'APP1OVED FIRE HYMN.. �_ -j,dit��iS �. ' BY FIRE C-i, yS ' 1 41, DATE : 2/2 347, SIGNATURE '•F DIREC OR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 o ,i. TY OF RENT®] n `,FILE PP N (S,: c Yoo1- ��ei , BUILDING ZONING DEPARTMENT " v�`� S, ♦ ru Nrvo • MASTER APPLICATION NOTE TO APPLICANT: Since this is a comprehensive application form, only those items related to your specific type of application(s) are to be completed. (Please print or type. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) • APPLICANT ITYPE OF APPLICATION • NAME ' (41.5 Ac) (r,1/ FEES Environmental...-Research & Development Corp. ADDRESS #1115 DO REZONE*(FROM G TOR-1,R-2,1A-3 715 D SPECIAL PERMIT* 1800 Pacific Highway South CITY ZIP 0 TEMPORARY PERMIT* Seattle, WA 98188 E] CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT* D SITE PLAN APPROVAL (Later) • TELEPHONE D SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GRADE AND FILL 244-0080 No. of Cubic Yards: (Later) CONTACT PERSON jElVARIANCE* . From Section: NAME I * Justification Required Robert W. Thorpe, AICP. ADDRESS R.W. Thorpe & Assoc. , Inc. SUBDIVISIONS: 1300 Alaska Building D SHORT PLAT CITY ZIP TENTATIVE PLAT Seattle, WA 98104 D PRELIMINARY PLAT I TELEPHONE D FINAL PLAT 624-6239 D WAIVER (Justification Required) OWNER NO. OF LOTS: NAME . . PLAT NAME: • Monterey Terrace Associates ' ADDRESS #1115 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: (Later) 1800 Pacific Highway South D PRELIMINARY CITY Seattle, WA 98188 0 FINAL P.U.D. NAME: TELEPHONE 244-0080 D Residential D Industrial DCommercial D Mixed LOCATION . MOBILE HOME PARKS: PROPERTY ADDRESS South of Mt. Olivet Cemetary Ell Cemetary Hill - South of NE 3rd St, No.of TENTATIVE EXISTING USE PRESENT ZONING 16� p PRELIMINARY Former L__.J FINAL uii.developed - Gravel Pit G-1 PROPOSED USE PARK NAME: • Multifamily planned unit development - NUMBER OF SPACES: • 425 -625 units ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW X.*.T 'EE,.::',,' ;*•Aal SQ. FT. ACRES 1y"�.�_/�! t(� �.-yam, .,�T .-7-. ..- AREA: 1,807,740 41.5 ar( ZI�J6 �i0;'AL• LE'S.,]�7!7 �9i 'i-j../ , FF USE ONLY -- ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESSING "" .)• '`' r n r .� r.i r s _ a� '', APPLICATION RECEIVED BY: ,v' f �. FEB 04n. 1987 , , APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: ""� y Accepted BUI L!:I N G; •:i IV U i_J EPT. E] Incomplete Notification Sent On By: • (Initials) DATE ROUTED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL RECEIVED BY: ( APPLICATION DETERMINED TO BE: 2 /j ' 0 Accepted . DIncomplete Notification Sent On By: ' (Initials) ROUTED TO: / ' Building • Design Eng. Fire g„,Parks 'I jJ Police L' Policy Dev. , 1.25J Traffic Eng. Utilities S • REVISED 1-n__sn , f • • Legal description of property (if more space is required, attach a separate sheet). All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17, township 23 North, Range 5 east, W. M. described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the southeast one-quarter of the northeast • one-quarter of said Section 17; thence north along the west line of said subdivision a distance of 252.23 feet to the true point of beginning; said point also designated as Point "A"; thence south 89°45'17" east a distance of 526.41 feet; thence south 88°52'04" east a distance of 799 .feet._to theA$ast line to the east one-quarter corner of Section 17; thence continuing south along the east line of said section to an intersection with the northerly right-of-way line of State Road No. 5 .(St. S. R. #169) (Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a general northwesterly direction along said northerly right-of-way to an intersection with a line that lies north 89"45'17" west a distance of 653.91 feet from Point "A"; thence south 89°45'17" east a distance of 653.91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning. AFFIDAVIT I, PATRICK T. EASTER . , being• duly sworn, declare that I am . authorized representative to act for the property owner,[owner of the property involved ;n this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 28th DAY . OF January • 19 87 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF • WASHINGTON, RESIDING AT RO AL • ,EARCH & DE57EIAPMENT CORPORATION • Patrick T. E-: tOident ) (Narrmrr, ,.Notary Public) (Signature of Owner) 18000 Pacific Hwy. S, Ste. 1115 CA:idress? (Address) _„Sea_tl e 4riA• 98188 (City) • (State)''''' (Zip) 206-244-0(18U (Telephone) • Acceptance of this application and required filing fee does not constitute a complete application. Plans and other materials required to constitute a complete application are listed in the "Application Procedure." L,-- • Form #174 Cr," Ai Q E... RONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW SHE,, REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: I stor, DATE CIRCULATED: FEBRUARY 18,1987 COMMENTS DUE: MARCH 4,1987 ECF - 007 _ 87 APPLICATION NO(s). REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT: ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE: MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2 VR-3 FOR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN '425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION: LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH OF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. SITE AREA: 41.5 ACRES BUILDING AREA (gross): N/A IMPACT REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS MINOR MAJOR MORE IMPACT IMPACT INFORMATION 1) Earth 2) Air r✓ 3) Water 4) Plants 5) Animals 1/7 6) Energy and Natural Resources 7) Environmental Health 8) Land and Shoreline Use ✓ 9) Housing 10) Aesthetics 11) Light and Glare 12) Recreation ✓ 13) Historic and Cultural Preservation ✓ 14) Transportation 15) Public Services �✓ 16) Utilities COMMENTS: 3a 1 - .�- � - /407-06-1 \ r f r;A. RECOMMENDATION: f l DNS /paMITIGATED DNS n EIS CITY OF RENTON REVIEWED BY: TITL1 .IF [ V E /l MAR 161987 DATE: /� #14 !MIMIC / ZONINGTEPTP 9/10/85 RENT() BUILDING & ZONING DEPA1 SENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET ECF - 007 - 87 APPLICATION NO(S) : REZONE: R-008-87 PROPONENT : ENVIROMENTAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (ERADCO) PROJECT TITLE : MONTEREY TERRACE MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT REZONE. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: APPLICATION TO.REZONE APPROXIMATELY 41.5 ACRES OF PROPERTY FROM G-1 TO G-1, R-1, R-2&.R-3 r'OR A FUTURE MULTI-FAMILY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HAVING BETWEEN 425 - 625 HOUSING UNITS. LOCATION : LOCATED NORTH OF MAPLE VALLEY HIGHWAY, EAST OF I-405, AND SOUTH QF N.E. 3rd STREET AND THE MONTEREY TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND THE MT. OLIVET CEMETARY. TO : n PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SCHEDULED ERC DATE : 0 ENGINEERING DIVISION n TRAFFIC ENG , DIVISION SCHEDULED HEARING DATE : ® UTILITIES ENG , DIVISION El FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU n PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ri BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT n POLICE DEPARTMENT 11 POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT El OTHERS : COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS REGARDING THIS APPLICATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED IN WRITING , PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS TO THE BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 : 00 P ,M, ON MARCH 4,1987 REVIEWING DEPARTMENT/DIVISION ; .--/jf ----eez-e-----3 APPROVED [1 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS ® NOT APPROVED . ,r1-0-e- A4c-.4.,,L ce !, ,e,4.,.,,,,,_ee_,e,ee_______ ii;-t. _ -,-----,f2,2- ..2,,)--,Ee4.--- - „,,___xe___,,../.,„...4_____ 0_,_____ CITY OF RENTON / </ D IRCfFOMIE :,,,,:v--i' 4vv MAR i997 J� BU ING /ZONING DEPT. SIGNATURE uF. '' {'P'ECTOR OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE REVISION 5/1982 Form 182 NTE EYTERRACE. MO R REZONEAPPLICATION' ERADCO 41.5 Acre Site Renton; WA • Prepared for: THE CITY OF RENTON Prepared by: R.W: THORPE & ASSOCIATES,' INC. CITY OF RENTON FEBmuifil ix 0 41987 CUILuING/LuNING DEPT. ' REZONE JUSTIFICATION In accordance with Ordinance #3113, adopted March 4, 1977, the proposal site was previously rezoned to graduated densities R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4. This rezone expired when the proponent did not develop the property due to high interest rates. The current proposal is to use the same zoning boundaries, except that the R-4 area would be downzoned to R-3 . Such zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which designates the site as low, medium and high density multi-family, with greenbelt along Maple Valley Highway. The croposal is consistent with Renton Comprehensive Plan policies related to residential development. The Comprehensive Plan encourages a variety of living environments with a range of housing types and densities, and the Northwest Quadrant Comprehensive Plan projects the addition of 1,850 multi-family units between 1978 and 1990. The Northwest Plan also indicates that land development should progress logically from west to east on the East Renton Plateau located in the southwest portion of the Northeast Quadrant; the proposed development would be consistent with such program. The proposal is consistent with Renton Comprehensive Plan policies related to open space. ' The steep portion of the site adjacent to .Maple Valley Highway will be preserved as permanent greenbelt. A trail will provide access across the greenbelt to Maple Valley Highway. The area immediately adjacent to the single family residential neighborhood of Monterey Terrace will also be preserved as open space, serving both as a buffer for the less intensive residential uses and providing recreational oppertunites. ' The Comprehensive Plan encourages planned unit developments, such as the proposal. The proposed progression of densities is consistent with policies that stress 'buffering of incompatable uses such as single family or low intensity multi-family, near high density multi-family or commercial/ industrial uses. The area immediately adjacent to the single family residential neighborhood of Monterey Terrace would be zoned R-1 and preserved as open space buffer, with the allowed density transfered to the R-2 and R-3 portions of the sites. The site will have access to a major arterial, and can be readily served by the full complement of urban utilites and facilites. The proposed rezone is both appropriate and timely, since it is in a developing area of N.E. Renton and is for a use consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. According to the Puget Sound Council of Governments, Population and Housing Estimates, the vacancy rate in census tract 256, (where the site is located) , was estimated at 4 .2 in 1984 and 4.0 in 1985. Surrounding census tracts ranged from 3.3 to 5.0. These vacancy rates indicate a high rate of occupancy, with rapid turnover of existing housing and absorption of new housing. • MONTEREY TERRACE PUD City of Renton Comprehensive Plan _jTanuary 1985 Compatibility Matrix Highly Slightly Goal/Policy Compatible Compatible Subjective Incompatible IA 1 X 2 '• X IC 1 X 2 X 3 -X 4 X 5 X 6 X 7 X 8 X IE 1 X 2 X 3 X IG 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X IL 2 X IM 2 X Highly Slightly Goal/Policy Compatible Compatible Subjective Incompatible IIIA 1 X 3 X 4 X 6 X C 1 X 2 X 3 X 7 X IVA 1 X 3 X 7 X 8 X B 2 X 3 X C 1 X 2 X 3 - X 4 X 5 X 6 X 7 X 8 X 9 X D 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 X 6 X' 7 X VIIIC 3 X D 1 X Northwest Renton Plan Compatibility Matrix Objectives/ Highly Slightly Policies Compatible Compatible Subjective Incompatible Land Use 1 X 2 X Transportation 2 X 3 - X Arterial Street Improvements 2 X Utilities 1 X 8 X • 9 X -, . •-... - •- ---- \- 1-.. 1 % 1• A._. i lqi i . ',..'-';".. .\..7...7... .'%.. ...\-1 i r•-- • i • '---C::- • . -,4_, ..:,- :•:. --.. i /Air . -,, . ..„,..,. • •,' I: . -. •‘...-.. :-.• .., - • .:•:•:•.• ea ! -1 f / et 1'IQ •.... • 01/710'.:::Ai: i y.,.:..,!--•--:: • r•11-›- .% "NN,,, WASHIN1GTON . . \ '7.' '• . C3 '-r-. .):..4. :4 I ,:."; I ' Illialikin:r_- •r -... .•. ..,• rose% --- 11111110... \.---C-7.---y of Renton , i it, pft tr. . • ,., . • . ,...,. ,i i %km: . . c o ...... . . ,_ . -.._,.. ...- !or: ... . .. , ._ . ... ,,,,. nil it..... I i -q %. 11Pki‘ ifilk . . .,r,:..A.,..,,... : :"?'":-.- f'-'- iriout , 737o • lfla alagg i .c, • ' r . .,..1 .c._ .. ,..... ,_ - .,.- - -Thi_;_,_. _j__ LAN •,c...,... ••• , ,, if / • - iti, •00.0...... .., . _._._., N... , . • • • . 3 .. . -0 , it :,::::::.....:_:•:..... , .j„„........ ___... 1 . ._ ....Q. _•................... _ ••••11 • • • • • •i ell ii.„00" .. .,. 111 ... ,SfighWail .•• • , , . ...... 1..... . , ••••••••••• . ..?...„,.....0.001.. , ...., .,..•:::,, mums •---- • • • • • • • • • • ,.._ 4... MPREHENSIVE1 a . . 0.,;.....',7- • we-7,e ••••••• • • • •••••••• ' ....•Iii::.:rillikmana ..:4/Aier. , mmill111.14, . .• i • • • • III 41kik 11614111,111 I . •0000• 0 g..,.....0........... ,, , . . 1 , .,ic7,1 Illigim , 1111....1111 ,02.17.,,,. . • • • • • • ..........i.,,,,,,,,, . i I • • • • • • • :::]:?i.:-.till--0 .111 .- % total 111111.1131 IMIN II I lir ' • .• Ng;:.......111h ,2,?, g• ..4_,,_,'34 • • • • • •se•••••1•• • • • • -; -:•!:.rillElt ... sigollose ' ' 4iik ..9..9 Illims .,:.- ,.?„,3,;,`,4 •Q,, '•,,. ••••••••• • • • ..• •.,••••• POINIA- ...., ‘:' ''' -cr"^ : • • • • • • • • • le•••••••••• .. hn.. ir,r; : lila E ,:n.,320-, ...Dr,1 ,b ?'„,..,,,c,..o.:„ ke • .r.I.To. ''Iii•-iiiik,"':::::::: •.::::::;;,-........ \-4.1.41 ::.;,:., -1:e',A* „.,..0 il____!, ..... ... . ,....... , .7. . ; .c,, ,cgs] ,;,.c ••••••• • ea... ....., . • is • • • • I 1 . -7.,• ..41111 is • -4 513.8.98gO02,:::: 1.1. • • • •r• -t, • • • • • :0 0 r. -a• _ ____„,,...... : -• • ,• • • • • • Mg ME a- ..... .. . ....:.. ...., ... /4 _.,o • , Tl , .. . -.., . ..ix.i.ri.i.04.gi',..„;-- e:11 0.••••• • • • • • • IS 343,2.. 'N. • • • ___. _._,......,_ ...• ••••••••••• t‘'. . , Ill '\-.1,:::::4.40111111111.111 111111Fr. 4.11:11% . . . ;_ _ 1 I I I kir Mi 4 I I I 11 1 II 4 7-: iggllLh •-sr, 1611b. , .... 1.1'4cc2-°02.82. '' ''' il MA , 63 Mass; -.°;°o:...%-; . '' • • 0 "111/11::111.f.••••••• tiPTION •,•Zi '' --:::: 6 .I, •• 10....=.........485. ... •...-••• ' 0 ' v • • • •_11. 0-0 0 0'0' . NM 3'-'o 3 o o- .. • VS 0-PC 5 0 0';,' t "ail i• • ''m • • i dira . . - Vs • •sr-•• •:EL /411 k .: =i°,,,,gg-°.-.°.-°°-- .1. -----: .11- -.-•--:-.•-. --3rc- ... _oop0o0o0o:5' ' 7-3::= "M". • 7 ...•••• _ , ..... • ..„,___ • _ ....... .. ... . ..••.•.. ... ..........,....,.......,.....,......,..•:„.„.,........„....• _.... ..........,• , LAND USE ELEMENT • • ___. - -,•?0,-(,-,c,-.--0-,c,-.-,„ i N ---, i ;.__ i , , ! 4•4:0, ._.i . 1 Single-- . I Commercia gm 4.- iki. ...;‘,;:e:;."Iii; :•.:.:.. .-.it:iii:.ii.ii: ...°0000:20:0007:::006,40.gperoortfo: . _... 7. . 1_ , _ e-'...... .i;i:i!.-11!!!!:,---::..:1: -_-_ .:, rimeivita....ip. Ina ......_::,;1.4;1 iy. .,,..i...;:;...,,,.,.., .::%.:..:.:.'' ,.. . ..-......0.... .. ccci..../....x.03.yo.:0:0 liMr.......,111+.44.1%. All -o23°c-o3o°-°--'- 4414.. ., ... . • .., Sele NIA Ft- ..4 .74p Crer9P.."-malimMOr .• -'0--.: .... ilorMattOMENN re ,03 ,-,.. .: ,..:;:::.:::..::::.....:.:: °1:•:0::00.9°:0;OCcf0:0C60.0:C°000:lf:5;00:03.070;0_0°:,:77 i.. :.1.......°.°.°.7. _ .. • 1 . ,. _ Family • • 4 .:- . - • - • ------ -400 \ Iiiik-•-•- ittlym •.„:,_ „,,.....:,;.,.. ,,,,,,_,...,.., ......::::::.:.:. .."..,"."0.0....0....c, ......c,.• _•:.::.,.:.:... ,.,....,1 1_.•:....:..:•,•:.-. Lowivi.' . . .. Office / Office Park - • .T' :.:, __ , ,._ __, ;I • - up - _ ___. ... .... _, MOON . Ai•:"..',_:. :3 t 3 oc o°o°,:. . -°^°-°-°:- • .t:::::::::,:•.::, ... Lobb rrrj°3 o c V illik ,...../7 /dB imillOGPS o...c;,o....c_c o:".: / -41A111•11- ••••wc fe,„ -15 -f:••••! '5,‘,::;::::,:::'' ••:.,.-- '•,,.. .00000000• , ,. ".•'.•:::.::::,:.:•:":'1 • . . • - - PueitniSFitaYmi .IY ' • - - , 1 111°...M• .. ''''' :11- • "'- ''"‘‘ I - ill ...."4". "IV 11 •••••'''110011011.010."11=c ------.682.4-3:I illiti2=1!" 's:re;t:i . ..2.cr'c' S gin- ;;:::: ..:......1...,,,..j-. 1,;/..:.:;.c‘..-C..:.•°.°..,.-n4.1- ::::::::::.:•:::-:.::•::.::•:-.. -. . _... . . • . •• ...:•• -. . . •_ •- • - •...........•• . •. •••. .. nsi .-/..-:-•-•"•: • -:-:• :.-:.::-- _...... ••::- -•:••• - - 0.,.. .„-i.---,i 4-3 °''' . -....41, .,_ , - . -•••••.--. .... ....;...-.... . . , ., ., . ,,, .., _ . ...... •••: • . - Multi-Famity . :- ., . . . , • _ow ._ __ .... ..,. ...,.. I..;::••:•'•.i:.• : • ........••- +of....-......., ' - .1m.I.11.11. 116. 860 •=.8.-dier ,- '' ''''- 1..r•'-i--''''- N --, •-•/''rt-,-!•--,- -,:;.,',-,:.',....-1,-;'-x:,,-.,0•7."--"- -"..-...-.1.. . . . . Med._.•iu, m De .ty I:-- .- ..:::.i::::,-:i.::.:• .,.., . ... : . -• .:=... s'' '=111. 1 ....,..... -•,,.-'..•..q..-1 e;:;:.,;•.3,":''''"-S f':!' -j..).--i•:',..01`'-.:1"2.';3'.".:,..,-,p".,,,',.;:,/..n-..'•-11"/T..;-.c.• . .....". - . . . •• jasammaushouissum ...._ , :Lissom/ • ‘,(--.....,:i-7,k ..- • na" Public/ Quasi-Public 7..-•c:.-r\2-,'.er.--':'4-:...::•t.1.:.:_.-.,_-..r_.:••.:.-_(::_•,._:.• _.:.-•.•:_--•_ --"_:•___-__•.=.__..•--"___._.•._:._]z.:.:_-:--::"_7_ .:_-i-_i.i__i.::i._.*_-_-::_.._-_•::_=.::--___=____-._0_IIN.I_0M•I_ I•.•I PI•O•I=..M11m151.I•a.1M1"N.-..11..IO..0..='M1.g.1'M°I..M.mmMNUO•...IL:a0.A°U. .."I...S1.IM00i..a4.N..w.m..0..1S.•..M-1..1.1.1a1I..•=NI1A1uE.1....•8111.1..S.01.•1.•.12.Z._1../•1..mM•1.1 1.00.•e1•..1,,0••..,u,,00.s-1 0'•i l0_.j-A•,L t..I.i•dI1MDif..O•.A-..'o.a•.MN•...-.OI.m.•.O ur.-s._O•.N-m.si-..•_mS••,,4..M,,•,_:-.aU.A p•l.Vg.:-„i.s4S.I•lII°i.=t.i4i.P--,„f-1Fo-'.ie..14"r:i::.:- ..::•::.::.::I.\i.::'...w1.1•-1:-,:.-.•11--,•:.,1,:,••p,„:.1-..w'1.•.---'--,_'`„-.'s"..--.,1':,,.,,.`,.0°:,.'.•,..•.::.•,•.).t."•i.%0,t•N§,•3.•:4 1•.?--:7•,,',,..'•4•''„...,,.•...i‘i,..,-•,,'-3c-1.,r.c.,:1;1:•,,0",,c.-,.,,1'.1:.6h?-,",...-.",,..,'... •..',.„5..,.,E'.•.,,:„_\.-'0..•,.",'.,"'„,,:0.,•'.‘,'..•"'.•-`•1,..„-.,..".,•.i.•..._.7•:.7..,_...3....l'.•.'.,!.-..,.--C•'.•,;,..N-...,.:':..•'t...,6,1..-"''7.•.,7,'.:1...:-0•7-,(...-:,:..1.7r e'..„,'C-._.-:..,$)7:-..--,,,-.•10'-.-..,1•'-r..• .,•c'-4(,,..'o-•",.u4,:-.-l•c.',.-,e".f..•...',-N•-..V-.,,.,.‘.:•,..,„y%%e'.'t.-..,0,)..-',,.;-,-.1!,-,.l,0:i .;..k 1.:.,,,•).t1•l.-';1i4.o_•---.1l.3••°-:Et•.'.'•i(:7•';.•'-'1'-",-.1'"s,=."..',,,'5.,'4'•).0.""'..'0..4,..4-.i„...r,.•,'..0,,YV•-,.x..,:-\.•---:)--,,I?-g•1..!-''.-,-.;•'•.1'!'.1,'IIP1.:.--:-•(•1.,`t-,-\-.T.:.-./(1-.or'.7..i;,-.-'.rr,',L-.e'1'":i:C:.-•.C.L;Pi,ce•-z-it..g--.-.'r.'r,,4.;,e_.•E,,,."t 1,-t-.•E1O.-"r..1-.T1.Cr.Cr:.•.f-:..:i•.9r.'rr_4.''-(...I(.--:-kN"•.m.'r:."'.-- ''..:•r0,1'c•'JI•'J,,C;r:.:-.r•- •--z ..:.,4•.: ... -7!.".'•:*;..,,c• .fi . H igh'4,•‘ Dlultis-iFtya m•-•ily 1. _4•11-_-_4---__-1•1--_1--.___••-__ Light Industrial .. ... • .. . e v 1 71 Recreation • • Heavy Industrial i ..... t Greenbelt - - •,.... -.., Manufacturing Park - _-_-_-_-_ - --_-_ _ ...;: ;.:: . - ____ c,,,-,,:;•-•( --,------ -..-5:,•:-.':-.,............000000,-'.-„: ---_- -:-=-7_-:-:=_,L.-_. -..1--------iios '=.' .:: :. : ::::.::: in. ‘,:n..,::-,'.,;1-1`...' 5, -,00'00000,c0 c •---; '.-. :.i....-- . .. 6.-•',.1•,-...j-.k..'e?,.: '4, --''.'s s t.,„: -:..:'a Yo°20°.°0°0`..:-•-. '":- -------:---<,•-:'--4.4 ------- - - • P•-- - , ; -•02.0.0 0• , -\•,. •;-,•-,: ,..,• !. ,-,.,,.,..,•iv,_ . , .,„.4.3;re..(...•.re 4, • .• .. . e.'.•-e.4,,•4 - •.... \ \c‘.-.-••••""'"-""---.6.---L.i..c.•-•4--- -..cr .,........... . .... . . ... .,. ..,„.., ..... . . • , :,..,...,•1-. 1,.... . 4.4p ••: L>\ >1.' 'V.V.4'•'• , \ ./ ........ ..... . ,.. ...... . ...... , ........ ...... ........ .... , '-::x•.-:: . , i .%.... - .. . , . .. __........ In 14 - ,r'•..--- ..--- .--- . rp,.. • . .,. • , , _, ...., .. .. ...,.,,..,_...„.......y.-...,...., .•.. -..,-.,„ . . -....... .::' ::::•:::::'..ai:: : .1 . -..-.'!.,, ,,:,...i.,,,--• .'''' 0'0., AYF,.8.-,. • •• 40/4' •..N."•••,•',-.7... '''' \ \ -,-.. • -':•.' • \ ,,. ••'::.;..-.•:::]-: •,' . ,"o o a Iki.. •• 0'0 0 0- t NI 0 0 0 'C"''.'."' • '-':-• . '-...C)..14.V.,e.....‘,......,/2.,:.' . , ---- , r i I ,, _-_-_-_- ,„tp-..,.-.::.,ii::,::•.... 0.00.,\Ji) 00.0 „,,....,.•„ ..,no .„. J.,..--L...,3 ,,.3: •- ,} A--.."• -,.„.... ,,, .- . ' __ - ,,,,,. . _ . , ., ...._. 0-0 .i,-:,;.1^•`;--- I;-`-'-:^'''....,%:) ..'P• •••t)...1), ,'''•r: '..‘;••• C . 0 -'..,.''•1 • -----•---- ----- ...... 4 stk. _. ••r t.-t !. ,.: -__=.-_--_-_-_-_-_-_-_ _____ .-_ IMif 0 O- -. . •000 '-e, -;.'''. °0°L,:\.: : ..:. =:'•:.- ..,.,..4 .ri,..p...;.,.•,•.... . . _-.,-./.7.7...-1 ii _ . te•-;t--.(F.., '1,:-.. .____-_ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_ -_-_-_-_-_-1-: lir ii .c 0....0. . • . ‘,.,,...1......7.....s...•• ., •,. .... 7'''),..f.'-',...... :.(:,''1' e'.": ..-.,-.{"P.,5,„,.................r.„,......7-,777""••••--..-..i„.......,., ...,,,,.. .‘,.. ........ •-- -I °°,3°0° `Ml•.::" ...:N ".)' • ''1• . ....::::::::..‘2, . . --.0...':-'•':6.',•'i:":•1' ' '' ' - ''.-' • .•'‘ ': .."' --- . • 9.F.C.(4.c:ra- P-C ' •.•-7.-===.--::::: ======. 11'-::._ ':' -- • . . • f",,r1 c. -:---z--_-.7:- -.:-.=-=-1-:-_-_ -:_---_--=-= .- 1 2:: . ,k 1.01(74'1:4.'1 :::,::_.!-•::,:.. 0 00 -PK 00 0 .;:i.:.:..:•.:.... . . ... .. . 116 ..., lim• - • .t-- ...-..-.„,. • 0..0._ P000.0.0.3:00._• i .....•A _•:-::......c:‘,.,44..'“--,•,:-. -• ,.„.;, • .• ,. . ..i.,,..,4 _, , I • ...pcs- . .•" 4••••' •,: -',...,•.,•'-‘s-....1 .1,..,.-•,;!-75):p..,..,;..::1,.,......),,,I.,.,;,i-i,p1:-.1.7.7;o1:7-;i'-.:',,,z,:.::::?....;::::,.:1'..:::.:`;'''':...".s:,..:. , ,., r-3.• .'• --- • t - ,- , : .-, .. I."''.fi•5 C:-..4::.:.1-..'.'...., .•-=:-----=-_-:::_-_-_-_--; ===-_-_=-:_--2-7_-:---.§:_=_-_=:-: : ..---,-.._i •0000 , ;,. •3 tk •. ;.?...... • - .' •:i••7/ '•-'• ' •: --:.7..,:-.7..v;:n,r'•:.1,-;:-1";.: .• • . -___Th 7 .: .• ..g,;.+•,„,c•:0, :..- .. •:: . . . ._ . .„ . - •i -. •"...I - t'rc,.:"•."' .4 „. ..C-.=--_-_--_--1-=- _--_.--__----_--=-=-:--_---_. = --= '.•':. . _• , .4e c ''/-s l',";(1,1"?... c''r9 --------- - .., • ,. t-,.. : -:k- . ., . --.- ---------------=-Z >- .=-_ ;••7:. •00.0.e.. ... .- •00.. .........„, . a.... - - , ,., ._,• . ::::i:•:.-0-c;..-0-6-0- --•• ...•:•0.000. :::°.°9:63 ". ....coo •00.0.0 lir IIIIIIIIV 3000000 ,J":.,.. .1-;;;;i11161,„.. ,,, 711/1fAIIIII-.', 4 :741;4\111:4. rilli. , ir.. r, . •... , ., _ ..:. . thi .....,111! „....... . . 0: I .. .• I ...,........ .,.. .. :4....,......v..„,... . N , • 4•••• .6•41 4.1r...rifpf42:-.S.:4,,:•.'r......-zzif,:-..:z.. . Z.-----.4.-----....-:.- .. _-_- .F. . .. Pt,,,,,. . /. • • •0 o o 0 , o oc00000pom 0.. 083. , t . . III:1.1j. jell 1 -• •00000. .o7o7o.o.o.o.,7 ., 0.0 ..• . 35 3 0°cool" •00c im. ; 1.0 Scale 1 -2000 A.-, q:•,- , 1,111111.,...-:0.0 0:0.0..0 0:....0 00.0::0:::0.0?0,0 •--, -• • -• - _ _ _ -•-• " . • .. , ••••,... -s, 0000_ OF R� A. �, EC F: 4% 0 City of Renton LU: Ao9.1 F� SEPSE���P ENVIRONMENTAL • CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43,2.1C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of aproposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for allproposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning,'shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the, governmental agencies can assist you. • The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even.,if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. ' Attach -any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacts. Use of Checklist for Nonproject Proposals: (Please Type or Print;Legibly), Complete this checklist for nonproject j proposals, even:,though ,questions may be 410, answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL ,SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). „ ; ti For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND - 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: • Monterey Terrace Multifamily Project Rezone., '"- ' ' 2. Name of applicant: Environmental Research and Development Corporation •„ (ERAD.CO) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Robert W. Thorpe, AICP. CITYOFRENTON R.W. Thorpe & Associates, Inc . "• ®• M I 1300 Alaska Building 11 � fff Seattle, WA 98104 l . FEB 04 1987 4. Date checklist prepared: . L u ust 30, 1g(36 oWlL�IIVV/ZliNiIVG DEPT. S. Agency requesting checklist: it of �tentoning rF:; 6• F�roposed tim or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): It is anticipated that the first .phase of construction will;;consistrfof preparation of the access road for construction vehicles, on-site rough grading of circulation roads and bringing local utilities to the site. This phase will begin within .one. yer of Master Plan approval and should be substantially completed within 1.8 months. The second phase includes site grading, extending of utiliti.es,• andlbuilding construction should begin within a year and a half of plan approval. Iloiis,ing construction is anticipated to begin in the northwesterly portion of the property, and proceedupthe'hill toward the east. Housing construction would proceed at a pace of approximately, 100 units per year. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. No - Project will be phased however. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. ERADCO Planned Unit Development - DEIS, January 1981, FEIS, June 1981. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Road Location - Edmonds Avenue extension into McCann Property and eventually to connect to Maple Valley Highway. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Rezone Approval Site Plan Approval (Possible PUD) Grading Permits Building Permits Occupancy Permit 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The proposal is to rezone the 41.5 acre site from R-1 to three zoning designations of R-1, R-2 and R-3. These des cations would provide graduated densities with R-1 bordering the Monterey Terraceu oolbesrepained as open space and R-2 'and R-3 zones to be developed consistant with their multifamily zoning designations . (See Figure 4) Approximately 425 to 625 dwelling units will be provided by the proposed development. The steep, forested hillside bordering the Maple Valley Highway will remain as greenbelt, in accordance with its B-1 designation. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide ' legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topography map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not,required.,to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications ,related to this checklist. The site is located in the southeastern portion of Renton, Washinton and is bounded by SR-169 (Maple Valley Highway) , Monterey Terrace subdivision and Mt. Olivet Cemetery and the Bonneville Power Right-of-Way.;, The site is located in the northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 23N. , Range 5 E. in King County, Washington. (Legal description, Location Map, Vicinity Map, Aerial photo, Slope analysis attached) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH 75% a. General description of the site (circle one); flat, rolling 411111D steep s o�es.) mountainous, other . b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 25-50% slope in the Greenbelt; 5-15% slope in the development area. • C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, caly, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. The soil consists of an upper layer of fine to medium grained sand with local coarser fractions, including some gravel. Site'was 'previously used for gravel extraction. _ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The development area has highly permeable, unstaturated' surface soils with no evidence of significant erosion. The'greenbelt area is stabilized by forest growth. - 2 - • e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately, 50,000 to 55,000 cubic yards of earth would be redistributed for con;trducton of the ro�3 sys m on the, site NO 2ff-site fill would be required; however to soi w c be. requited f r. an sca reas. f. Could erosion occur as a resu t of clearing,gconstruction, or use It so, generally describe. Yes, the potential for erosion could increase during construction. To mitigate erosion impacts, a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be implemented. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? About 70 (?) percent of the development area will be covered with impervious surfaces. The greenbelt will remain undeveloped. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: A 25 foot hillside setback from the top of the bluff will be maintained. Other vegetative and mechanical erosion control measures will be implemented as will be specified in the temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan. 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, suspended particulate levels.,will increase. In the long term, the primary air pollutant' emissions would be those associated with automobile traffic generated by the development. Fire- places in some of the units would also be ,a source of air pollutants. b. Are there any off-site sources of emission? The adjacent gravel extraction operation to the east of the site is a probable source of suspended particulate matter at the project site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Measures to control construction dust, such as watering and reseeding of cleared areas, cleaning and sweeping of, streets,,will. be implemented. 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams,' saltwater,' lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. • Not applicable. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. - 3 - . ( 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give • general description, purpose, and approximately quantities if known. No. - 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No- b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and appaoximately quantities if known. No. • ?i r I ufr, (, 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for, e)aample:. Domestic sewage: industrial. containing the following chemicals .: agricultural: etc.). . Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None will be discharged. • c. Water Runoff (including storm water): • 1)• Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will • this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The primary source of runoff will be impermeable surfaces on the site. Stormwater will be collected by storm sewer, routed through silt traps and oil/water • separators. and detained on the site in conventionalHunderground storage facilities - before entering the City storm sewer system locate;d'•adjacent..to SR-169. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? ' If''so, generally describe. • With careful construction practices and maintenance of the stprmwater system, no waste materials should enter groundwater or'offsite surface waters. - 4 - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Temporay detention ponds will be used during construction phases to collect silt. Careful construction practices will prevent litter, debris, or other pollutants from entering drainage. Catch basins and screens will be used to collect litter and debris. Oil/water separatorswill be used to remove gas, oil and grease from stormwater. Adequate street and parking area cleaning and maintenance of the stormwater system will be provided. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ti deciduous tree Tder m_aple, aspen, other ) c evergreen tree• 1r, cedes pine, tfier) • Shrubs • grass o crop or grain o Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other o water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other o other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Most of the sparse vegetation existing on the buildable portion of the site will be removed, with the exception of any sizable stancs of large trees. The greenbelt vegetation will be preserved in its natural state. C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near'the site. None known to occur. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: . The site will be landscaped, including a landscape buffer in the R-1 zone between the multifamily residences and the existing Monterey Tdrrace subdivision. Native species will be used in addition to ornamentals. 5. Animals . a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Hawk, heron, eagle, ongb, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk,beaver, other squirrels Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,,other None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain,. • No. ' - 5 - d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:, . • The greenbelt will be preserved in its natural state. Native species and landscape material$ that provide food sources for birds and small animals will be utilized. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and/or natural gas will be used to meet the project's energy needs for space heating, water heating, lights and appliances. • I . b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this • proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The units will be fully insulated in accordance with the Washington State Energy Code. � . 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: • • No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. �,. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are needed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may .a,ffect,.your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The main noises in the area are from traffic. - 6 • - 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic. construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come • from the site. Short term: During construction, noise levels will increase considerably both as a result of construction and excavating equipment and as a result of increased truck traffic on adjacent streets. Long term: Increased traffic movements will result in proportionate increase in noise levels. Increase in noise levels due to human activity at the site will also occur. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction equipment that will not exceed the State Maximum Environmental Noise Standara will be employed and operated accordingly. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? (See attached Existing Land Use Map) The site is currently vacant, open space. North: Mt. Olivet Cemetary, single family residential, Stoneway Sand and Gravel, undeveloped North of NE 3rd; _.undeveloped, single family, residential, multifamily East: undeveloped. residential. Southwest: (Greenbelt - on-site) , Stoneway Sand and Gravel, commercial, multifamily residential; Cedar Creek. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe..T: No - the site has been used forgravel extraction ' y , sd"any original agricultural potential has long been lost. c. Describe any structures on the site. • There are no structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? ;, N/A I , e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? (See attached zoning map, for proposed rezone designationand current zoning of su u di area f: l iat is`t`i�e current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Low, medium and high density multifamily and greenbelt. (See attached Compre- hens' e Pl g. 'It applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, the greenbelt area has been classified as environmentally sensitive due to steep slopes. This area will be preserved as 'greenbelt. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in .the completed project? . Assuming an average household size of 2,7, approximately 1,148 -1,688 people would reside in the complete o ect' ' j. Approximately how many people was..A r the� conpleted project'displace? None - The operationsand and gravel not been. has been Sdepleted gaat the site, so the k, extr-'roposed u to avow or reduce aisplace 1enteimpacts, ii any: F' None necessary. , I - 7 - • ' 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and • projected land uses and plans, if any: The greenbelt will be preserved as open space. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. 425 -625 units would be provided. They would be primarily in the middle income area range . b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No units would be eliminated. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None necessary. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The tallest height would be 35 feet in the R-3 zone, and 30 feet in the R-2 zone. The R-1 zone would be left as an open space buffer. Building exteriors will be mostly natural wood and stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The proposal would alter the views from the single family in Monterey Terrace . The apprearance of the site will be transformed from open space to multifamily residential structures, parking areas, and open space. The proposal will not result in the blockage of any views . C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic-impacts, if any: The portion of the site proposed for R-1 zoning will be preserved as an open space, landscaped buffer to separate the proposed development from the adjacent single family residential neighborhood to the northwest. The greenbelt, ranging in width from 150 to 400 feet; located along the southwest border of the site, will remain intact. , • 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The proposal will add street and parking lot lighting and residential entrance lighting. Headlights from site generated from night time traffic would be an additional light source resulting from the project. There would be no significant sources of glare resulting from the project. b. Could light or glare from the finished project, be a .,safety hazard or interfere with views? No. C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Existing off-site sources of light or glare would have no affect on the proposal. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Perimeter landscaping, fencing and berming, especially,around parking areas and road entrances, will reduce light spillage. Parking area lighting would be down directed, to'miniMize light spillage offsite. - 8 - 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? are The closest designated recreational facilities one mile or more from the site. These include Cedar River Park, Liberty Park and Windsor Hill Park. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. There is evidence of dirt bike usage, which would be displaced. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A jogging trail will be constructed along the perimeter of the buildable portion of the site. The natural vegetation, open space buffer in the northeast protion of the site will provide an area for possible recreation. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Due to previous extraction use on the site, it is unlikely that any • archaeological resources exist there. There are no known historical sites or atchaeologica]resources i the mmeliate vicinity of the r ect c. Proposed measures to reduce or control'impacts, It any: tiro. None necessary. 14. Transportation . a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and.describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access to the site will be provided from NE Third Street. NE Third Street intersects NE Sunset Boulevard to the West. ` It is anticipated that most site generated traffic will flow to the west. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximately distance to the nearest transit stop? Metro Transit routes 107 and 110 run on NE 3rd, providing service between the site and downtown Seattle. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? • _ Approximately 750 to 1,250 parking spaces will be provided on site (depending on the number and type of units developed) , City of Renton parking requirements will be met or exceeded so as to accommodate All parking demand on-site. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). . The proposal will require a new paved private access road from NE 3rd Street. - 9 - e. Will the i,cu ject use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The project would generate approximately 2540 to 4,000 vehicle trips per day (depending on the number of units and the mix of housing type) . g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: A traffic signal, with "volume-density" timing features could be installed at the intersection of the primary access road with NE Third Street. NE Third Street could be widened at its intersection with the primary access road to accomodate westbound left-turning vehicles. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for • example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The project would result in an increased need for fire protection, police protection, health care, and schools, corresponding to the increased population. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No mitigating measures are proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. There are no utilites available at the project site, but utilities are available for connection nearby described below. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities_on the,site or • in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity: The site would be served from the existing three phase electric power available along NE Third Street from Puget Sound Power and Light Company. Natural Gas: Washington Natural Gas Company could supply. the, site with natural gas. An 8-inch high pressure supply line is located in the NE Third Street C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is u e" .tood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non-signifi . - at it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should th a be -ny s •resentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part j /// Pr o ! i atri r r Name Pr ed: Robert W. Thorp 16. b. Continued. right-of-way and a 4-inch high pressure main exists at the bottom of the bluff near the west corner of the site. Water: The site lies within the jurisdiction of the Renton Public Works Department. An existing 16" water main serving the area is located in the NE Third Avenue right-of-way. The subject property would require a loop system installed in the Blaine Road and entrance 'driveway rights-of-way. Refuse Service: The developer will contract with, General Disposal Company for dumpster rental and refuse collection. Telephone: Telephone service would be provided by Pacific Northwest Bell from main feeder routes located in Maple Valley Highway and Bronson Way. Sanitary Sewer: There is a 42 inch Metro Sewer trunk line located in the - 10 - ;R-169 (Maple Valley Highway) right-of-way. Since the 8. inch pipe serving the Monterey Terrace subdivison has inadequate capaci.ty ,for the proposed development, it will be necessary to tie directly into the Metro Sewer Trunk by installing an 8-inch line down the bluff along the southwest side oftlii,6 11-8-84 • • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION • Monterey Terrace Associates / Environmental Research and Development Corporation Legal Description All that portion of the Northeast one-quarter and of Government Lots 7 and 8 within Section 17 , Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W. M. described as follows : Beginning at the southwest corner of the southeast one- quarter of the northeast one-quarter of said Section 17; thence north along the west line of said subdivision a distance of 252. 23 feet to the true point of beginning; said point also designated as Point "A" ; thence south 89045 ' 17" east a distance of 526 . 41 feet; thence south 8852 ' 04" east a distance of 799 feet to the east line of Section 17; thence south along said east line to the east one-quarter corner of Section 17 ; thence continuing south along the east line of said section to an intersection with the northerly right-of-way line of State Road No. 5 (St. S. R. #169) (:Maple Valley Highway) ; thence in a • . general northwesterly direction along said northerly right-of-way line to an intersection with a line that lies, north. 89°45 ' 17" west a distance of 653 . 91 feet from Point "A" ; thence south 89°45 ' 17" east a distance of • 653 . 91 feet to Point "A" and the true point of beginning. -.--- • , . , • • .._ • ‘„ • . . W ..... ^'.7...,,,,, i,ji:61,r: ,-...,.4..iff.,,,,t1/... ....,:r"444Z.,..'I.,„....'•'t.,,,,f"„,,,;•t: --:4'...7-1.:4,1`..W.7 4 ' - •r.:,;;;A:10.;';:.c. '...1.4.1':-74.*7-'41'-',,,r 1 i. \;.;1.:,,,',Ot!hlie• - . ‘.,. .?, -.446. -„4.,; . , ,. ‘• 'A :747.44,•.;i ,-,., / :7.4',"!..:14;..'i';,:, 4.1**,.'4 I.-5 • •• 'C'e,'''''251;' '' 1 ;4:::.:;:.Vi4p,'<frE 1/4a''''.:,; I • -;,i...::;x44,. . -..--:,4, )• G , ,a ,f1,..1.,..fr,tt, 1 ;':',";,f '',',ri 7,471,,,r,-, f-A.'7.,i..;:...;•' ,ft ' - ...lix tt•••,. - • • -‘,..,, ,P...t..... "N ? • .2.'2N ''',44,-;.i., 1 ...'..:'1 ', .*..;4 ,,'''t0..\ ' ‘ '''.....4"""...4' • '. , ..,.., \ '451-314:141t, , ' k . r '••• , .. -,-:.4tClois20 - • ,• L •,,!,•,,g...::„..1.0,..4.,-: _„. BELL EVUE ) f ; • • • ;-•••••••--.4.-v;r'.14•4-1-,33, '., : • :.,:." .'.- :.• ,-..d.e,'•44itg.'4g,•4;1•1(7'.;4i., ..,. , 4' `-kcs4 rkc'te-4...7:41. I % 'k i ',; '''.2,.f.2.:;:,;..,,,A,,,-fr.,,,c ..-.,... .&;•,,-;,.. ., N --\•.,• i .,,,lfv,tiot-k:344544..": r?"' ' AT . 1M . ' %At` ...-. •, . ,55f,S, •-- , Z sALAmKmE ,/ .:;,,,,,,;.•,•v.` ,:.•......-4.;;;•:•!..f- ,.. .-.,•,..iv•f,,,;•4 :' •t3-• : 7-r.. ., • - •':.!,- ."..".... AM IS H i%,' Alr ,4*A. . . r' ,...,, i 1 i•„:,... ,,. ....73'6AP'' ' ..' ' " '*;..;''f1;:'f'iti,- I•90 •' ••!" '4,1,,•:......,,.. ..n.1144;ity.13.1,3:o.••-•••,,, , '7....$:: ... -fPf.,.",`,,,R47=',4,t,'!47,1, ..71) 1p i 4 l'g-'•6 :'-'i'4k-iii}:rj.Z,Of.:'-41. IA - •,;:-.54,,,i,:Z''''''''''...••Z•:,14.td,%51.i / '' ' .:2`.:*:.. ::::..''''''t•'.;% T:.:ia 41 . , ..' i 1.90 ..,,,,,,,,,. ,:..;.4,:‘,,,r6....,:,;,?...,,...-,:: „. , ...• . ,,,,,;,::,, ..:':.;....:7,1,414::"•;„`I . k / , •- ,-,,,:t.•..,...x,,,7.,?..-2;•-,;z I.5 "•• • "-,-.3,:•',. ••.3,3.:•:,i.,:ti..?- •,,,,..344- ,..,: % i.*.A...4.41e• 1,„ , —-,-• 3.•*.e.,,-.•..-__,. I . 0:':7:11.7,2A. • :: • •:34:1,-.4 f +1•YrAt-Eivik.:. ER. INITOINI /1•• ,*••,, .•...• -:.4:- ,r.,..-•.,, -;-5.:1•.„.- IN: ;,-44.1.0,..tr- • i.••:4;•i7' -"'r'11,— •';-t: UKWILA• ci 70 C•', V..Y.4"..,.-' •''- , LAKE • '..•I ..7111PAlf..1' 41,..YOuniG 7 • . .OC41-:.. '''.N-• . 4.., . •,i\...\..............._.;?, . .1VI— A P LE 1 -...2..„.„,„;,• •••••-.:•,•.f. ..o,;1:•.,.....e,„•.• s '''=,,k,t4., -.,-•-•idiZtii,,,• •A• VALLEY , ...., . -''..--t 7 ., •KE NT . 1: ''.7.-- ...,•33.,-,..•• •,. .'„3,-3,.,.,• /'..,. 1'1? .J......•,,,.....; 7- .....•• 7s. --.1, .:,.- /.:ise.:,-, -.: c.---" 1 ,, ,,i-Ax.5.:',.....--,,•,....r, .„ . 1,-,.J-;, ...--1 ,-, .. •,...nt,,,,s,r, CO 4 , ,..,. . ,c........4- t'o, '-..hi,,,, -, ,;7.1-4,- , .T.i„, , ,:,:... ,. ,:,;.. .. . BLACK . t,:..,:I. N,,w--:.g7.-.:17)-fi 44-'''.' \-::,:''i.4 - "4.:-.:•.;p--.-c«,,.r- A0 •AUBURN DIAMOND "........# •'..3',. ' 3. - • . •-3'3,. .,.. 3.•334t: ...,..1,44-...3‘ ,,..,. .,, ‘ ..... - ••:•:.'„e.t;f..!,..1:.•.,; 4 -, • •,s. . '.'"?..e:V.^.", s ,---.•,,-4‘ 41...: 4...•..1a..‘• • .#0., `..`, ,-•!...'• i.,:•..i....A. - . 1r, ''.,*?.. '.1";:V ..............•FIFE 3-31:::.,4.,:::3,-o-:.,....4..."•.••' itt,, TACCIVIA • . : • . . • ... • , . . 1. LOCATION 1\01AP 1$10 MONTEREY TERRACE • NORTH R. W. TI-IORPE & ASSOCIATES 3/ • (7141.0446,•-a__ sai 7Q Miumft,14,4 is' RENT ' W AIRPO T ► Z F Q ( 1 N.E. 4th ST. Q • L.NS ET =V D on �'7.—N‘---7--;, N•E'- N..- \41 / AIS, TY■ MT OLIVET IM- AL ' \- CEMETERY MENTON , .-rLIN... -. 1 O I .--"" C°o4q R' . ..'._% ' SITE k. % - II q Sp r. P0 . _ -4 1 GaP1:1 igikp -AO . 9 0 to r a APPROX. 1 MILE TO VALLEY GENERAL HOSPITAL 2.VICINITY MAP & CIRCULATION USGS BASE 1" = 2000' MONTEREY TERRACE NORTH _ .._ R. W. THORPE & ASSOCIATES • • • • -... I —- •••I i.,•••••• -,;',*,,. ",-17,,,....1.—! •1•I•• ,•;.;)*,••V"••.,...2::ir. . --1,11-..;•:,••..•'s''•.--•:,.1 3i1,6,p,s4,00 •'•51•A, .. ..-..v..--;0.. I,—7 .7.-",'a- i-,-: .t.,i;i,--,,rue,.'''''-'6-1714i-.V:::7'-'4VIEA,71:4.- '' .• '-'-`'4' ' t-' ' ' ..- ' 4., '.-,--- -r-4 - -: ' '5"'"--irt-)&09‘,";....4-!",..--4-..f,T :p0.-'T.?.......4-•%.,,'),-..?",.,.•';,-.-......;;'--..-.,' — .;--"s'f 1. . a*'-4-1-v,i • 1$-",3:- izfv:4',.' t -t,-".''.. ..te,,..4.-**'•-.4..k„,44 Pi.'''Y '14.6i 4t ''a.-4,r.'!."'-..-.4.....i,i-li-ilt:'," ;-.-. N f':,4-1':4.c'..'•'t1,,*,`,1::*.'',I,M.1•:'„?' ,..-tit.'k.'... 6..!•:,f'., . . — .-,,,•',1\•,,t,,i.ffx,,r''''-- - "•uf. .t? '. .t.' •-t _,Qat 1,4'1.-'1•••.*;'1..: ,;31',.11:-.- -f.,7--.',':;.•71'.•.)1 , '-,...• i•-•:•:.]: •,7••ik''14.-%-..•,,i,..a461 --. .7 .',. „ i, 4..rtX,-.t:;,,...,ji Am 44 - 11- r,-.4 o . L'4x. ., .! ( ,....- t • 7.-7,i; ;-:`... ....o. :4'7.4, 4 ';'•,...')';',,,,...••••••)-,i'•';',..,!...,• 744k: . ''..,tiV;;44-::' b' 4.•.- --•:„•-4, .ii-••-... t •AI,-'•`•', 41•141'; (44.",-Xit...ii . — '' • ,. ..) - .t ',.'.•.Z•I'i'?-.44:',i.":'•* '"."-4;CZ.,: '4.:',c,FA 0. KA a, . . •a' •- ''; . 1,., .• ...,. ". . 4.''.,-' ...4'I'll i4;,... • . •:-..:-.:-— •-i-Ai•vg '°....4rf '..%;-,'J..'-V; -''4g:1."\s'''''SF.'.='s;,:' ,-I.';:i.v4" . 4 tb Ai-• , • . ,k.,.,.,.. ,f.itb;;;‘,.•4``.•,;;•_:..,....1.• 7t,•1•,•Ti..,,,64.4•••,4‘.; ••-%,'",•• • 1'4 "i,.... 2 iiiiiiiadakiii. "'z''-'•,,:1;;tt-'$-417,i0,;- - .-- ......,-.4.:' , -.•;,. ' A :Le, .;:.,,,'.ix.,.). .%, •,.3. ,.,•• ...••.41,i.i..;•::It: • 4,. ' „. ''''....'....6.,;..- '.... 4'.-.',"',„*,;(5.•••,;.•-- 4-..h.e... ...... -" Ar.,.t.t%e,.• • ol:“.. Wt.•'''', -" •••,-,..." "•''-1).,-'"".,4i• ':..„.. . •••‘''''01,Ptc,ie..... ... '. ''..•'4;:t. - '' ' '''- t- -..11 4- •!iit,' '•L'"'''" 4t• ttt., >. Li • 41 44'A. .A•.' i i.. ',"i',•'.',:,-..;,..i'...' ' „ , „le)te- .4.4 . . . i,,. ... 11.•IF•-.4.0•5`.1,,.•.,,,.. 1,,,,,.. • .,,,4••••,..i...v.,--. ••,•-. .7,1' • _.., • ...it, 4 ..,'.A. .. :. ••, ,-. . •• ' ..4'' ,,;,,,,i;?,,,,,i,v„,i.•14.1•41-0..viet„•,,,silik-•,,,..44.,'`k.9;;‘,....0. ..t\tir.'wtr. .•A`,..,4',,,:,?..,s,';.:',';'%.''''':...,k"F:.,,',..'4.::"..a.,:' ,'..... • 4,,,'A'' .!-- ,.;..t. .'- ,1.11.. ;..ict.-040.p',,V..,;•14 ...r.A-a,. 1.% ...-.>.Acix:a Ia,t,.•:•,•' •A..4"....rrA „ .--- 0., .; „,,,,,...,..t.. -...... . ... ,-• . , la,7t..34-...- ....• . • - _,-.,: ,,, . •. . . a ,:,,,, ,.. , • .. • -"-'- ... - —A ' •', < ..,, Ic.' "-P"'` ,,,,,.• ..-;,, , •40 . -• ''''' •4,0°P°.' .•••'••••‘'°••''• •• ''•• •0,41000-'• . • • . ,r.• • .k '•:••:•.'•;•...ra. .‘•''''''''1.411'S•..:S.^..'-..%;,1":"'1!0‘...0 • 1. , ,,e, .4,74'.,. '''i .:• • '. -v.-1'. • . •"" . . ..."' sti•,., , , 007., .”.'"•••-',, ..,‘, v:,;* •••/ ..:11-",•‘• 'I,!,-;.71j. .,,,-.. . t 4....,Larl..,-' ',44 .;•1•••°• ..,,,,IF,...›..,,,,. '4'*.V,;,Y4JN''.!4. s.•ti4.',./et,,,i,1" .7.4.4Z!;$4f,....‘:', i ''',., ' . . ,-•,„ , , •< / ...Nilo- -,,,:'1'-'-ft4ikii,,--.... i.: _:-_-_-• ,`. ...--.......a. • 4 '"taivaa"'", .''''''''' ':.-.--.. .' , 'WA'S'. ''''''' s . .i,i ,,1-'• ..:'',7'''"•:.' ' ''''-'\''''. *''''444; . ,. ,..... . .,... ..,„,...- ... . •,t , , ,4t... t,-1- -,-,:......-..) a • ik A7tt, 1- ' .•.:49,''• *- '.0.,..'4' IX„ tit' • .P :.0.• •;.. a,. N, ' .46 • - -- • . - -4'....;•-• .--Irg.' lr.••• - ,,..' • . ;',0•71tr.,*-----.., -,; ' • . . . ,... ... • ---,... i 'i.'.,..0 / •,. • ' •''.."?. '''',',,7 a,,:'`.., a,...1;.. '1.. „,•'...''•,$,, ' .° , # --' - .. ..!'zlt,-,. '4114' ''. .,„ , ,,,,'; •.a•.1e,Vt.‘,47, ' '..,:', ','•O::,4%-',,'7''',..:i .r,„'Pt.*, - • -°'''' ''''' "" " '14,4,I.,'' '-'''' , '.•• - ' ',.0.. •••••:1••:,,i• gir:4:-.04r.,-4.- 7....,....fv.•• ‘...4. - . *...z;i, :,,,,;.•611.7..,,--4,;:,- ,.....„,,,....,.,k ,,,..„,..6,,31.,,,,,,,..,,.••••,•••••-••.- .4'. ' • • •••04.... *•••••••••,°:•.°l'.....'-'-.7- 0-'•'-77770, . •I • A Apida,"• •• ,.'•i: - • ,;.1400 ..'0• •••' ::a,• 0-.,,....i.•.,,..44.4„ loti.--,, $,...--, - . tk......i..- - -- . It.',; z•, t, •" ,;:.,'''itio•.,,';14.,`7•46P? ••:''‘‘`,4N -i-1. ,-- '‘' - . f' •'. ,-..1'. t:4-..T.'1:•,:zIlka4"...:......?......................:„,....................mmemossa :.X;'' i,41,.._. ``• ' V..- •... ,44,...,,„....7r; . ' ''' . ,„...-WI,0r:P.:..) 0'-,'.0.04:;;';'gr*V4•.... I • '40.-''';,-.00X••'''';'''.4 s'!'illati0t1;,'''•ka.,.1,;‘. '.'1.ille•'''.,tt:•.W•t I', .' •:.' •t...t,,,,4.1 •a••, r•- .xr. •••; , • 6,- . , - • •••-• ‘5,titep.l'-,,,,,./.17•17„ . 'Ad `st,'„a'k047,1:''.,.',.....-14. ,ile. ...,..-•4:W c - ' • " ,',.. • , . ,, c ••• •‘,':''.17,4ifittni;-...7•7.,:.,•,*; :St.:1-' ' te,'Ilt4 k.,,-s ""e. ' --,.-i, -,-- -?4,.-4,,,t-,,..t,..;--Ar.-. -..4.,,...•••••:;-4•:...• J ,.-1,.,;:::‘ , 1.. "' • ''...*".'"'"°., ..,-.. •7. r•'";- •'1''',[4'4.1 .t.'"'; '''''''''''''';'.';'' %,. '7,1* r. , 1 -• 1 .., 4,6 , ,,,...1 ',q.t.,,• -- ,.--,4-,,,,,,,,4.-„...IR, ,e .1-,„ ..,„. ; .-, 1,., As ,,:. .....17 P.13"-.! t..i,, ' ,..:...":'.=.1:4..k`..4....*,',':',7- "-,,--'.- r't,-,'''.....'„:%..e.1,;:,'''±-.1,1 - ,,.,,.,..,-. ..../. . .. , •„ ;.'".4.'"•••`1"'••',,,'ItIA;1:?.",f'- -).:.'4.1.-V.,•,,,W.,,,,e.•A, •-..-'-' • ...-.n7 ,P.Y. ...- ,.., .-4p,''..-'1' '1,,,,eg.0::'-x. 4"6.• •....s.--4.t3.---4,3-w...,,‘,,,,,tr,.- -,.., ,•••47,,,,,;-#.4 • : ,, v6,5.... ,!.. - IT 7'.'7•-4.6"'j • 441`g•k,;,41:1:, -. :,.... ,.-iit.4...,"'z -•ii4.r N Air - , • -,-.., ...,• , ..-..,...,,, :w•.,-,..-T4=*, .,..,,, ...4.2w..t,i,.:::-..7.,,.. „V„ ,• ,,,,,,,...A.A,..v...,...ir ,,,..,. .,, .. fX,:_.. .a.. ''.`4• -'• fr. ;'•;" 4...,,,,,,a.&:,,,,„.-.,-t.t.,4-.„,,,,--,-„,,,•- -Tty,::.., •.,,iidvillari-9..:Atil ...".,...,..i.',..s.o..,;AT.-:., -..'''' -i,.-,,.'. . :, . --,..'.,-1.,..; • ,..,,..— 3•,,•47,,„•,336,.;414,,,•,,kr.'on •••&•-•-•-•-• . - -- • .- ;•,..04-Q.;•*-eA••3•,-374;.".,,,,••”, •• 1•44-4"-Y• •• • - .7' 1.1.7•• Pitil.641,0',11.' -.I ' '..-' '... .r*,7iriaito...1 ..711.1104';' ..',' D.,.141.1,i,' ,-'-'.'t.ilt":1...f*titi.-'4.t. .;',117t.'• -.7..!,,...,'‘ f'.1:•,...".,4 „ ,•'0.,i.,., .',... „„ii..;•.%•;. ........,,,. 7 , .4 -,,...4), ,.,:,,,,••••9‘4•1_,,„‘.„,--41,-T.4,,•••• 6,1,4. ••;,•„Aar smtawftireg i . ,.,..kkr. IP •- 7.!.. .. ,;•,..t.g.,4"A(.." ..-,..i.#01.ipilVe.N.,4,4... ..14';,-,'. '•^ '.1. ' ' '.7-. .. ';.‘'.• . .• •.1 •••. .t. :,,.',... ...rttt .. '' ' ' -' ."' ts,,,4 ••L'-.4.•1',••4•7'41..., "Alle:1,4...i.: 4,....i. ...,*4. , .,:-.„-.... , ,.::* ,..," '.-1,54W pialatalty '7,• . ; .46q:. -•,,p,ft.,,,,..• ,.,1• :„.....,,,,•3..,...-6.,•,t,.41r,„, .?!,,,,,.,110,•••37.i%:'„g6.4•••.,•IlL. -,•• t•• • ..• . ,,p...x•,3 .4 1..--1%.....„ .a.......M,kti..4" . . ..'"Ility,-; ' ...4.14.41:-,41,4:44..f*4:14..NV•:.?. '.':::',...V*41L11.,1Awlyky„..:, ,..,,, ,,,,, y. , . , . ,,, •,. Irt.. ;..., , .4. „.,,..r„;:...a...,,..,,,,... .. -41..2r.. -,y,, • ' ' #1" ', pkb,....., r A t A ,..f-* _,-4.,„.40A.,,;:w.44411x-p v. , ..trzlornirtz:',.-1-, .5'. ... ,.. "'AA , •tt•-•0; - .4)••••••••••,..4- ,,4,1'i*..r.• prt-""1:;•1`i•tr"krO"' ...y •,,,..,.v.,,,.-,,. ,-..z.,,,..p4a- 04,,,,. tir.,4;z:01,..e.t.t.x.:. ,......:44,..,;1.1..,,ie ,,,„. . •'‘ ..... .-.1.,4,;...,,,. • -....''.."- ! 7.'.'.;p•.;•;•.43. '...,,•13••"4.10- .07 viz.if.....ci,.-.6.,,12/.-.....% • ••";g*-...,:v•--r•-..,. ,64." •,. ,.. '•••.,...••,:lit•,_ •••t •••-••....... .„4, ••..E.-„,..,,,:::.•.sit ...,‘,A33.-• - . ,,. ":, '•••...ii:AZI• t.•,-Voe ..,1.4%4,4e-ii...-;,,Lod.fIalfiwifif,Abita.1 .-41.7g,,,..,..,-,:. . - '‘,...,,,,,!••Is, -. ,..; 1 , „. %.43.,,,,'.:,47-,-,1-$413t4tikr4- ,4—11'..' - -;,...---4 : -1- .i-'4.-..... -- ,.',..fiv-r.,.---V-,:-.R00--,:iff.0:41,.e."?..4,4., i,.-..-T,t- . 1, - - - --, 4, , ----,A-.. .. ' 4. ... ;: -•••.,:•13....t.,',4.-•,:ert5e,i,,*-',::---,r4r---1'6- ----- .74,, -- -- . • A ..,14,„,,m.,,•••:.A..•-?fra..- ,.. ..-•- •+. ••-•i• '-4!„-,0---.4,1. ,•;.--,7. . 'Sf4-0,..'144A,`Ag11;.', .1.44' .'- '-..'''N. •P''''' ''' •;"-':-- '•••`‘ '''. • F '''S 4.' 4'.. ..1... 4- ‘. . "* '' , ' ' . ' -• t ''... ,Frkift '-"...• - Y• 1. •,.7 •l• ..' 'I': ''1' ::.. ....1 :: k.:.1•,.. ,' 'Iris? '.. -,.,'• . ''' .-:•=4;,!' V-..1 e.;-.4.-, 4 ,.-.., -'-vv,- :-.., .• ! ' ,,.=,',...,.' ' ' :'e'*. '.;:,- .1' . .)1 4;.,=.•,_„' • --,4,4? . k .".voi,i.1*_ ,'',5) .:IV/ rtam ..... ..; • -- ' ,.' :No -:',,,-174: -A.,-;,.....,:r ,..,-4..,,i" ..- .. ze-•1 .,, •. .:-44. 4- 'sr.,.',1”.4.,4.”..-1r: ,'''..," j- :-,....-• - *4'.' .1,,• ;.;?,.&Sy;t4ti..', .4?.4f, -,.;.>„ ''' : - -. ' ,.* .-a= .,, ,e.j.,...t",:a144i,' ,:li'irgi Vottr •-• ' O..- ' ' ''''. , :.-i,.....*."- .---. ....-=4.14 03-4,m- .ti. , .,.,,,,,,I.,.:,,,...,,,,. se:;:fiepor.f..;: .., ,?$-• - • , ,,; rt. : .1.4,4 .,.,•4,4,••••„•ti)...,•:4•4„,3,4n,i4,,•:13,Ft.i.o.,-, ....$=k•-1, .....• :6-4°,3._ •.,...1 : •„ ..,.. ,.., ', ., ot.i tvtua le ,... .:. --,,,h4,...e--,,,,,...,0*41*..4-- -',..tt,, •f,.',$,•!z•t,• i'-tr..'"g;0,83'''•:•*,71,3,-,211:"*WV24;:•74....i..;;;i:N•••• '''"1.- -' •- ' ' ". \--••1' . ; '` *'•' ' ' ''-'g• ' .6... ., • it - 6.1 1 • .6, •01 -. 6 .re;„,3.-0,4,......1.,zioik, 66 -- I, 4 •e‘/ 00 0 ,,,i.°la,. 0,0 ".0 •,: Al'',0!14'f...;;T0'1'..4,*•!rle'44i4.'''4° • . ''''. - ,00. „ , .0• •Irk•'0,00••• . -.,ii.1 . ,`.. 41:44.4'40..00.0.,,••••‘. e..f;:•,-Sic''....ni k-,'...1.',r, — -• tal 0••,.. . • •g•' re••• ‘. .,,t; ' . ,•".. , ,,.,:a,: i•4 , M ,..14 ,...„..... ,... , .,.•4,4 , ...,„..,-...„...,,-,..:., . . ..---,,-.;-....h., -...P..‘vi...,---; ti,."...-7,,,,,.-;K-,..-4.%:.-,..zet-0., -, ,,-- .:-. I,: 4. 1:-- -f,' . , , tik*:V..4'''44t!'..:,*:' '' ', ..•n°...-'.t 41:414Z1`1: 'Att.,4:44 '%'-. .4k Y,'Csl :^,V,i,' 'tf . •:,, ;,ItP4.XU1-'- — '.441444z,. .. 'Ai'.1' ....''.-^. • ''''''' g''..-- '." 1` 4:,..i.," . ,, • ' • ,-7,... ;1#0.". ''s ''''.:,',,,-"• .,'.."'7,7.,sr'Igi•, '"' -...4%-e,ms.'. ..t.:4'•.`,1*a. . ' - ‘vi , .... . _ •. •...3••••.. .0•i1.11q,.1,'•••• , ,..0...;'•• ' ..•• .'":"•'-.4.1:.?...f10••• ,•4••••0•.•',0. "••• 0 0...% 1 . '0 ' 'trP41•.' N • .'4 '41 • (a . pa 42,,iv. ,,,.: .,,,,,.,,,,,'. 7....•dgatt0i,.. ..,04.5a. .. ..W.,A,,',,,..2' 't"..'ijii'e.c,..7' .t.,'7e4p4f,...1.7. '. • e''''. • 7 . ' 1 '1r- ' - • '..k..V4.1.;''',,:.;,7•-,„ *IN.'''.'" ' "' 7 '74*.i.S, '''' '' . ' t• ?!.. t. • •• Saaa40 .,1.?": lc/ ,,:' .,, -1 • ' a -7 .4,- , , . . • • :..rig, • '''' • '- 11,-- +-'''' ' ' -'-` pOi, ' '4-•ta, ''' ... . • ? - S-atop . .. - • ...- •' • '- ' - * ‘: ii:-• .,:•i' W.' .4. . •r „_.-..... Ili 1) ' ..... - ..' ..'' -:' -7. :r •' ' • ''''-'1.0et ' . • . y'...ri,e.?; Cri,, .;.::k.. ' ',. ., ' ...' -""'"•• .".. ' ' 'VI :' 'f;'...:: Iridt9t,...444'.......k....... • -..T. • -.,• .'''. ' 4.,...• ,, ,.-e , . s',417,. it ,;I.. ' ,., ' -'' ..... ''''''':•'14;.,..;:i'.'1"kisi'V'''.:=.,' 33 M • ,!...., VZIStAi'- .4, .. '-1,..., ,,,,,a,„1,,,,,,,,,,,:,, -,-' s ....-,%.....,__4„' ,i,l, _..C...,::-....';':-; 41470 . -.... '......."-,...-.......- -,Pr ' ' : . '' -•- , • !--.-. ''' .-. , .F .f"'A.-r•i :-..':7i .• :..1r,w:--;. ';:lii.7r,f; 11"-,_''1'•:----.',''• --!''''cl(-1-.--- .'.,." . '''t ' ' • ,. ,',.i.„,..". '...- -..,,,•.A'A.,-' •, . 1:1 'Y1 M 4/ . ,' ir4i t4,-.• id,.- 7, i •441. .-- -rt-,1, :,21„ .- ag.,A,,i44,r • ., ,*,t„, , , ,„ . _ .. ,iir, .* -1 1 *...;41a.•, fli: •- •;.•••.'"1 I,.-..' .*4 '-"` *-• %'"• ." -I) '' !te• , • ' !i* ' ..; 4 4 Aik.. 1.,1 ' `7.••e' A,' • is ' i • • ,ii 4,'- tie,., .-.--If. ..,.... ^, . • .41...1C4 ./..." •'i.1,t Iii" '.' .11...!4:13.0....• .,'. .1,,.„ .. .-1. 4,-. ,, .. -...„. • ' '--":•1• -„, . V• - ii. .v, ;.) ,.. , ... ••' -' %'."4'..'it .'“ ' ' '' e 4 En u) 13 ...., ,- '..-,1: . i ('irJ....*4' ,.:e irk:fill ,t'' 1, ..i,,,?..,.:.:,,A.,.....,:!AIL--,,., 1--;,-..,•,,, ., ., ,..7,,„ A'4, ..f.4-fr..4't,.,-i s or t- --1„ii a--.' 1-- ' ' ''',‘i -. - ,•• „, , .., . • . . •- • s--,-, , '0 ... ,::-.,--..,•=•"'7-- - . • '' . --...qg% - i,t ii,.. . ,t it.. : ---• - -...44-''',... -• •,,,,,,,,,,,,,. . 0 'T i' ill le ''' -- - •...t. v ...,........:A .. ,.. - . ;.11,.... _ . ‘4.4,,. , ... • ,• • .Ak" •41.<;', a .. .... .. , ti U 11. t• ,..,2* •- • . ''.'• ,., ,,;. ,.. .- •te,,m,..7 -I ', i ,.. • •-•• . ... , 4Lii ' 4 -.5 -...41-•--0..,I..- .. #4.Ai-.,L.3 LW!'" „fr.:- L 4. 4111.".-.- ,-".- .4,-0'.1P 1.•. a :aka.. -I 01 o • es U) U l•!....-,,,,r,rntJ1 Fici .ifch & . • Al f 40t1IT I AI. --$1•111.1.NA Hill 130100 MI :).•....1,,,,,,,ent Cor pot..I run 1•00.,•••••:,a llo•-lioa,,IIRL:,1,•III 4-1-11 ,••••••••• 6 - 6 - - 7 7 4 8 4 5 5 U1 W (1/ kro ' . .. . . .. .., �_ 4 : u .._ __ sp , liu,;. ;;-----, , .. . _ • • . . .. _ • , . - . .. t„, 0 , u tn J % > '' I, ; 0. 1- II In W I- C ' ,-=';?< , •,•.,..,-;,-,..,..,. .,-,,,,•-. . , .k • /" ,,\ -.. 7 ' ..-.:z .,,, ..*.. . - . , , , .;_if p/.,/- ; ,) ,/,, -.<-....:,:,.;..,x.::,:x.,,.,....:::7....1... �, ,•y'�'4Yrk' r • .\ \ 'N''••1'`•'4;:-Z,•^.',':';' :::,...t.:. r:. , • ..f...„.i.n,„.54.......4.... :.... :::‘,-, ..,,,,,. .,,,, is ,i•:., , 1 I A ' . ,0,9:, . , ..,,,,, ••- :,kw: ::,.-.•;...: 1 ,s,,\‘,,,\,.,:, .. ,/ , r,..1.. .,,.,.,:, . . . : ... , .. • . \ I. - 7 , Y' ti ' , T d 1 ' ....•-••/.......7::‘:.•' + ..,,' _... Aek\„2.....___, It i N,1 oq pj9 IN 96f1 •C,' •,..1.1, ,11ON„1CVM 1„A11,19 1 M 1,,, .I ,•p•,: ,l ..�_, ,I :1. I. 1•i 1!�Z: , v7 IND or''III ulk.+I :'IP 0 11, J • • ••• ••••IIo..•I•I••� - ••• •• :•••••• •.'• ••.• • ••wN wN NY w• N•MNN NwN N N N w Xw■w%X•IY%%■NN. . . . . %•Xw XXM R X K R M..N..w nwn ♦ // ••• :••:••'••••:♦: •:•• ••:••: • M R N • Y • M • N N K ■ • XNY NKY M ■ N Y M ■ M N NR ■ M •Nw N Y N ■ XM. /� �/� • '••••••• ••.•••'••.•••••• • w ■ ■ N N X ■ • Y N N w R ■ Y N XX•NXN N ■ N ■ ■ R M K • N %• Y• 111 1• N•••••••••.•••••••••• :••• •'• NNNNNRN}M rNYN■NRNNNNNNNN■NXM■N%MNNNNXNNNMNXNXN}•N■Nw■XN•XYNNN■NY•NNNY• LU N f_ •• ••• • X ■ ••••••••••• ••••• ••••••••. •••••• X X X X, M X N K K ■ • ■ M X RN NN XYX N M ■ N N ■ X X Y X N •NX R Y Y - ••••••'••••• '••• ' '• '••'•• •••••X•NMN■NKX v•N■NKNXN•NYNkN•NwN•NNNNMN••••w MMNNwNXM•M MMN NN NNNw NM NN X•XN X . ••••••••••••••••••••••:•••••••• • R N Y X X R M X w w • • ■ N N R K Y R NNYN• M R M X Y M I`tt U •••••••••••• ••'•:••••:••�'•.••••••.••:' •w•X N Nw N■N■NwN ••MWRNK}NN }N MN NX N MXX YXNN NX MX■. . . . . M MN XN ■ XX X MNXNRN NM NN NN Nw�`,\ O VI 0 : :••••••••••• •••••••••••• '•••• ••• r N M N R , } Y ■ N Y N Y • M N NM ■ R YN N N X N M k Y • Y //� •••• ••••••••••••••• •• •• • • X R • M • } % K K ■ M ■ X R X Y M Y 11 Y } w R N • M R % X ■N i� �/'it • yI '•••:•• ••' ••••• :1••'•• •••••• ••• •.•NNN•N}N•NY NN, M R M R X•NY N•NMN•NwNNM•NMXw••M■k • • Kw“ XXNNw•1•N%XN • XNM �l Y M Y //1 ••••• :•••• ••••••••••• •, K w M X M % M N • X M ■ M ■ • N N M w N • k ■ X M ■ ■ X w ■ '_ �.t Q t1j • •••' ' • •.•• •\k % • M M w Y • 1 • X Y ■ • • ■ X M • M % } M•M R Y ■ ■ • N % • •XP I& ` Q •'♦• • ••••••• :1•.• •\ Y % Y X • Y •X w R • K K } M R w % % ■ •X M K M M M K • N X X X • F. 1 L '•••• • •'••••.'•• .• '••�••NwYwK •■XXX •NNX•X••wkwRwY• R Y Y X MN•XXNMNYN■NiNXN•N N M X X •• F•. J • Q (Co : •••'•••• •'•.• •'• ••••N Y M K N M } • • ■ • M • X N N N ....,• X N 1�r_- _M�X . LM q7. W ...I••• '••••••••'•••••• • ■ X • Y R NM R ■ M X w Y % •• ••• •••: ••I.• Y Y • X •N X . • • .-X - ▪M X {' �.'P 1 iff 1 ;T-"1 ,i4.V. .4 •• ••• M . ▪ a• : • : •• • ' • X } R MrY I :• •�•••••• ••• • ••• 44. ( f 0 ,��... • ) I/�•• • ••••••• ••• • :R II Y w Y w } II r X / 1 , 1 ' 1'1 k _ . � •: : :• • ••� w } AXNYYNNr `--•, t� — ,.t(� 0 •••••••••i�'' •�: •�I• ': ' •• � � _I_ .. Q1• • ••• ••i••• •••••• •:•:: ••••• • • -X • • ■ • • X • I . I \ ( C� W ................•; T• / In NNX ••••• • • • • XNMMR ■ NNQ ••• ▪ t L ( ••• ' • • • ••. Y X X X w II II • • ••••••••• • ••0 •• • ••• �' Z•• •••• • • • •1 X M X • K M N S1 '•. •• •••....•••1 M • • k Y W •.' tlG- rp. ,.. ., . . _ ,%_ . . •• • • •••••1'; -- ..atX It MM� •• •• t 1/ M ••'••'•••••••••••-••',.• •••••:••• I_t N N •••• \ • N N N N N R ■ N ■ • 6�••. 1 1\• • R , • mXII1XXX 0) Y w w N ■ X ■ N %N IIII R X. i M N w M • N �•� f� N N M R R M M X N K %b•41 X Y • M ( W kfa iiii -,1r.•.,•.", -4-,•-te,..-rt.t ".•• r- •N N a in • , ti `cc e' orW r d Cr W ?• 1 U '� J J t,. E. LJ IPic . Q ft'tr�R Q E 0 V • �<<}��`< ¢` ` a 4 a U. \, - €i.I 5 'i `4Z*c�rrd``` .... Q ' Ct`;s z 7 W 0 I �,�tr III I Uy Q •• • 0 Ii z 1 • �IT`c., • r� , 1 eJ f ' '1iYj :r u~1 1• I .i-11 1.t: ':'lkrM►liG?J i� r�l al��g: I L��•, (-,•�i�r IFI•El ( r_fii .j�,� �.. L..lFhF: F! rt�yhh�..{.rll tI. ' `L� VI. •..F �r � �� I .•1 PRernF ...1 fYtea.�i:s1 SFr � �Il.l..,,. �L•r■>�rll, i 0 0 1 •1rFi. (.� t / :rrr r �e rr. T ,.. �:_ 1: p -..7. t.L► 6 �• 1•bu.•' rF!! rI r.�l•�Mi FL•Y. G 1 r �'AcPV-FI. Fcrl._ I. "� .�/RCMI.b• F. 'd �r �r Y.���k i.tFr�,-■r , I1.' fi +I �D C i Ft„ p�L A Lri r „.,.„a}.. t` rr ►(y�� !! I I Tj—ter T \ • C�7. �n�lT L r. Al. '.'hh �FIL� I �FIA`Ef .I FGlyl 1^h� l--�rEa�,1_ , P4FiK 1M i i I ~ . i ✓, �t. i r:�.F' l:� r�l•w.cwr "Fill'T hF r r. I.L.,�^�• _ �- . I +: rA �� ry+� re r P. CO n t.- �bl_ -I�I __ !( D \ 1 I I Y i nommigg , r r r1 v 4 I_ - - p 1-- 2 ..g . rs. lt 3 ,.,.cb r.ikisiErtti �j� mil• if .4.-,J.)-,.; II • i • '—'-' 1 • fa �c�. �"o .re+: r .mac 1 oU m 1: iL xi _ - 2,,,- , v s . ,, , . m ; . / N7N,.., --,-....„., . _- - ,,,. .„.. • . . . . 1 . /... ----, -_,,,, ,. - „,‘.. - - 4. . `. . Ili' IT' i4 .,„ , 5 ) TO ---' ..: ( .1). )N )..L. .• ••.,.. P.7*... r .'-':---•..'„ ,:.4. 1...... . W /z� c / �i / 1, T / / ��\` \ 0 Fa //' . ( F/ NOyitR - . ,• •_,••••,•„--.47. 03 y 1 1 - % /� _ z'• � L., I-I-% a,- 71 ' i , . /// . x . .. . sV.. :kc,,,* i - [. (H. , i;74 "ft vi4 • ...11 ( ' . \41 ,\ . • 4 t. m r.,5,._-::„±-?.. . 1m q 4 7� `.• .i . L ' n • , Cat i..N..:,. ti..•lJa� /// - ( Y: D Q ! — — �� mow. w . ,o �`_c fi . �2 . . :,.i 0 u, ��'l ' - - \ I __ _--- �'.. 11 ; -. ' ' �'• ; -;'�Ems'