Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
LUA97-103
lry lg T o I I 1,` ;-' i i ; �,� I:I new townhouses 3 --- `I �� 9� ` y I I I•p. '\ I 1 zoned RM-Nr. ., T.7 'r '� > tl . 60-- +-80-,--80-�-8>T� 5£ 1 ~ �.:I �i 4 _ 0 4n/ iI T32 ' 1 1I 1,r 16 •� J , . ► 6 2 I Icycts, pii 1 I 11 r 165.65 I 169 i4 - ° 14 .s 5 �q �.a as 1 I 407 di ::1 ioE I 1'� • N .• ,� 8 >t _�19 �Ih 1 10'.7 • 15 I 4i - J - (2) TRAf,T' ` ti�� '-�� X I; r _ 8 _ 5 4 ; 3 -2 - 1 1 ! I _ W = 3 "c' °6 7�,S.9 n. 'R1 * . .; ��. •. Iola �l1 710 I - 140.04 • I,� ■".0, 4 '�.-.. x .-1 I 6 II- - 120.02 I % :OM eo,007 .- _ . ^�„ 60.007 82736 _ 35 SHPL V-I47-9Q Q >;d • �.� , S.E. 107TH PL. °� Commerci apartments 2 7° - 21'•�.,��, 12oe! N - KNA- 15"--.- I al $ zoned RM-N 7 1 �; $I1 •w,.o.0i�i�i♦ .ri. sil' ---- -i�t.1i--- rJ SI �.., I c �c+ IT ,: P c�1��1 S HH OY 1RN E 12'0. 3 ., services „ I x �'" aI 5 drni7Io 140a.,1 CS% CJI° D C ' 70 i zoned CN I A 48 t;0014.s .---j "RENTON--°°r- -COR IId=� LIMIT t13.3�'�.,z -- r ►srsD� 453 ,,czo E'� __ Qt. 12 C18‘ H commercial s:107`�"'services III !' O,y--'.--- 1 zoned CN �cco W `; s 101.12 i ••.c 1 .5i ., IT _ �� 1 b oG 0 w l c so c cr 'r, I I a }LT 1 /� o Z I lu a I� S.P. 052.88 1 �1� 1 'oP• I I v > J ' I [I �c�r ; I 1 1 t�I stl � I - Q • ,T' u5 � ,�, �.,�t, Honey Dew _ >' CO (2) N ' (2) •s."' Iri :$.: �``2�- ; 92 mmercial services m \ �� , ai}to•,-.-•f✓�+/ ,ob- L, N 1 ci _ 444p N I -� /.� 1 zoned CN Q 1 I a a, 1 I IY --V.--r- C QI�: •5ys q rse,, IS.P.330.7• �;1 . m 0 l' Z t* .tea.. .. 16S01 .. 16�A2= 92 Q 1y� 331.42 - 13 = C I81 ' p92 �32-R °I ° C. so commercial services I I - •• • • �- r ryey. I I <) 0 4 0.5 AC. 4 W liJ zoned CN x lci -- - - ---- E c=� 1,nj _ � , - ri.) at • 1 11o3e , -es 9- ------ M HIGHLANDS PLAZA 165_29- 135.5-- : I I_I ��- - ---- I Q�= 13. - l,.i R-8 0.51 Ac.o +9 20380 135.H 192.26 Q apartments $ L • J • c1) ra 1 2 4, ; 6 �, i 150 � 1 y�J oN� zoned CN . •, r 165.25 <� 13ss® Q I- /- 15 E R { 9 E - II 150 150.59 W �N5 �1g Ir e* r` _J athletic field r , ® ® ?O 193.05 12130 O. • V 246.64 5 lid 120.14 ell 162.41 �/ Q zoned R-8 ,� I. -- o # _ a , > V. „ ® g, Z� 4 Q 1555 townhouses ) c ca170 , 0 ' •� I!' a s r �� - zoned CN - 61 . i • S.P. S.F.330-79 . 327t O ® 60 60 .. - '-` ., '+ - 9 ertar- _ ,:, .A1 C._17Tu_oT II' I s L.- • TRANS. LINE--ESM±--- - - - - -� ,...[.� s >� -1... '+J`'�1-•'•tom+ .....�. I rr--5';�' "X"' .'•� =I - ,,, - - WV I. - _ _ - 160 4C M.$T. P. 8 a61.081 TRAiVS LN. ESM'r II : James W. Hazen - •fc. t?.•King Hall church . •.90 At. f 1 , v iI 1.51 h�. . , ® ,i 1.3Z A G. . . 4 [I]ll 1 ; 11. n ,2 ., ci 1 I I�: __ I • • • Q , 1 1 rs L' II siL__-_ C .491 i --- • ------- McComas 11 I Ac~, 11 0 ie" ------ 81 1�0 i II �, 0.65 A c. ��;;�� ,,,, " athletic field l ; , 11 325.23 @ 11 t87.?� 6 1 ti 1 30 257.2361C2).1 0 zoned R-8 1 p II 1 - _ 0 1 'II James W. Hazen * H.F. Seidem O chool Dist. 3 .+,,, 1 4II . ram.. :1 _ nn,, a I , 1 IL . n 0 - ae I' King County ` undeveloped land ' 4` 1, \'1 1 4 E. I =I1 'I zoned R-6 • .. zoned RM-N --- •`1>; ' Hazen High School a ;�. Mil .. o ��' p 1 Hc. M U.1 A - 4 M�c 6 _ zoned R-8 - �j�y 4 11 ,1 • II • ', 86 :3' "' 164.41 ' o I� S 32eDO„ .A3 �70► 256.83- p it 0.45 Joke A. Palmer %i- 1 -ofj Ac. 2 11 / ��\ 1 1' 0• m� Ieo '. •Iliti 1 i 11 { I i i 11 I o 1.41 Ac. -11 if - I a I i • 328.63 76 1 13 /11 ° II el ;I: • 11 i t11 I ''®12 II - -_ I a 1 , N Epj5B L.�Stevens 1 Nt IIc6 ' .,y�� ' 11 I I .„ d_ 5 /1 w W ,I(.1 I ‘ ' I 1 COMMUNITY ,r 3 AO _ 7+ c^ rj, O�' 110 1 1.07 AC. ® ii (n• I • '� /. a 1 1 Johnnie L. Bro les 1.9I Ac. _T *::1 .I ,I 2 328.43 1 ; n , . 1 I 1 1 Lloyd A.Ron9holtli Qp , + 1 1 114 s 2os 14.11 •� • 1 -8 I - i 1 631.54 O �J.J , �11 II II I • uiII °z ii 2.29Ac. „o 1 "- I ,..4 Claude J. Burhardi : '" 'S>u I . i. ,y I� '74,33 '3 I i i 1 1 e 0.9I A c. A. Nevin o� 112 II� \\1i g Gorid9)e \% a d 1 R-8 soon cli J. ti ,, ' LI9 Ac. Z,Lt ; :; j Edward H. Klein I.96Ac. 0 W ' 11 a inn 8003 `�r 3 I I 11 a: u r 631.69 2 52 60 ill' to _ ID ; ' ''1 .n , North �P II6TH ° ° cS Scale 1 in = 200 ft NTH ST ry =`", ST.) �7R !r. ," 19e,y3 6/3 '4) 6545 494.44 13S ,,,N ;;`II 4• �ii 1. ,+4 I I 44 11 Z8 C ^I 1 1r II . -�I I -- L o = • �kI1_ I I m t_ i I 22 1-j, I i ,35.di!, . --- 7 I • • • lk. • • EXISTING-EL.QIgER PROJECT US Po'"A"°P EQ SUMMARY CXIgT:NG ® WE EX ore lelS.M� — —.-__-_-_._ TETNORSIIP.EWTEace TELO0i2 TYJ-S000- O _ ___N?0TN-STREET _-_-_—. 311.I RAIL CIELLENE.VW SSA SWAM,JPt RENS.. EASTING'I'1 1 INOW 23003. _ >' -- --—-- ��_ OW OSVALL AVE IE WSW EROOO 1 p 4__—__ ¢_44_Y—__— EXISTING ------FT.IvT•J^! RENTO WA WV. WSWE.W PP��yy�EQpO�E I T Q � -,q[. EII L�2L P'LE GRAVEL ASP. ANp,'Ml❑R I u77 _3`J� � WTM R- - - TL.T EXIST I IT�f'D• cE1 I ill__________ t ' .1 OaRR:EQ .. - l -r- GTE PROLES TO CONETRCT A RADIO GOTINGTIONE ' I �. 1—_ FX 9TVJG OCLT'AE PAOLI,.TIE PACIRY uICJ_WOOT OP RNbb METIER SITE NAME 1 I 9VAiG GATE / p e� w A OLAe of mom NO WEE JwtFSIu,EEcram AT 1 T 1 uET1 N)ANIWUI pm SECTOR M PIECED?AND 20 'I TEL.imER ..u EOIIPI'ENT 1 OO.O' MONOPOLE PI •`�I� EXISTING TEL BLDG. O =WPPED \ EKNG}R2 012E SEE RAW IQ TOTdLA MOWED d 41QY NO / su ,_ cw,nP.c ExdRrtn a TE EtnN 8� '^"'d�u^.Jy.�,,.,., - 9L`, SHEET d-1 - 317E NUMBER, i I I .•'"'�io 2�iA4-1 a a� zcaG R E 9V.RANAOMEOB _ I 1 \ coreTRCTxN TYPc WA FIA (� a�ED EXISTI J TIO'Y"POt- ���1 COOE. T• WA I1 _ LSACFIIICE ff \` - 1 (� DRAVEL ,.. _ I/J ry i S�1ErrTdmke�1'ee- jfM1` , ,` gx' a6 1 NO6.2 GGEU - I — j :'' a No am GRAcen IS PItlIroE1:D R R 1 H F.: I Q p "P CaIGRIER i1 YCODED u w AREA --)V NEAy g/ ^ CONSULTANT i g g i I t` /// TEAM e e • I I I EXISTING T>s/ ag._ I JN CON9ILTAO GROW,IN.OR°RATED y I SHEET INDEX WEI AVE.NE STEW 1 i I 4N�E f 1"PJ V I r� TEL.]a:E37 TEN YIOO{ .� I I aWWDED a> VIOCDED 1 PAX 2of,431-amal O.MACT. VNTIEIM AREA 1 T-1 11f1E�t YIGEI�Nap. ARCHITECT r e I . 110 I I UICCDED I GI SPE RAM SITE■RVET AICNREKTCN ED RP-_ II • I 2a A•1 STE EOWP.PIPERS..PLAN.PARTIAL�@ WA■1PGTO1 93001 • SITE PLNC el8 55145.ae SECTION TEL S05-S3T-1001 1 V • f W I A•] EXTERIOR WIWI. FA%.tpr•i31-10CA — MilI I 'd 14REN A RGTPQiT CQRACT.PAND DEAN i �__—__—__—_—__----_ a J 4 A-1 AROIRECIRAL DETAILS -SEp• .+�1€__ � AEI mMpA1O E(ECTIEOAL /' SITE PLAN - SCALE:IP•3®-0. LEGAL ." VICINITY MAP APPROVALS MIEME11 .1 DESCRIPTION >m..R S . . . . . Q . . . . TAX PARCEL WEER 0.230.Sz1-0T•000 3 GTpT RF IdINIV$.yN TWAT PORTEN OPTSVEST SE-NNPO.WE SOY■SOmC!e•C1ARTER CP SECTION n.TeusemP n TNEI OR.RAW,EAST. GIETT-iITfL ■-■ ■ a■��■1 WI.KMCONK,VIASIIWTCN LTKi SOITIEI6Y OP TIE SOYSI RATAN GP TIE RHIIQi•MAgE YAL1E NbONT.WEPT �� " ■ ■ ■ ■ TNAT PORTION CV SAm YEW CtE•N ALP DEeaaEEfl AS FOLLOW MEGOMING AT TE E.00215,091 CIF TIE VEST LSE OF Y GTB'1-Son ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ MAW SAW SECTION n VATN IVE SORB WWI CP WO N■IWT.TUDCE S TS•a11b'E AL01S SAIp RAMAN YJOST TO AM 9TIN m " A.2LIIn EJIeTNG FEW.TIEM£S wore.0 ALO0.SAm ROW WWI TIE10E N D•Ai'00•W pg00 FEET RENEE S e a aMY W ppp V G18T_f£ DEGITO Ile YEST LSE H WI SECTION TN T@J'Y N MEW E RTER WV WEST LSE,OCAS FEET TO THE PONY CP ,1, 6j WI WO L//JIII�-'ll GTEN-SAR FCIW WO DTG>erT THE WT ID RPf OP T1!1101E1111L'ST CARTER OP TEN SOSTYEST WRIER O SAID SECTION 23. LTRO Gomm,.Q-TIE RENTONYAIRE VALLEY NESIVAT.-A20 EXCEPT TIE NORM 20 FEET O.RE EAST 10 FEET OP NW 611]'1-UP SO2SYEST COWER CP TIE EO TRIE'ST COWER OF SAD SECTION n.CONTAW RINI ACPES I!IOW m �- /\ N16N �� T- — SONOOL Pr PRIVIVEN • •• ' � �� 19� ®EVELQIPMEf;IT o MIIIIIII ,•m a v MB "`-I loon MORI.CAMEO NEWTNANSAn.ER PM - - iimYeoim UM^or r Ira' IN �.1 I I�GPAtx TSPEPTI ream.,cum 1 • I I rase iorta�nrt repro ILHI TRANITRIER.C. RiR COON N MYR.GR., ET MERU COMMACTOP TO OTOTRALTOP TO Mom.1 I POTALL Dry 117.1 RCMEa�tae.er to lRaarol YRL,POI PRP P Gao.ic.AO CM ORPOE Pi AO.a MM.PROM OPE IRRORnI YAW Y CCZP C=SUMS IL•OC GAME! - nmran n.,e S� PRIDE m�w CRE AN a IIT AT&T NAME: rwmo _ _ _ MONOPOLE .a►ACY •VATTED SITE i':34 �•���� �q'As�{��'� �3,$ .'L`.Q'�,` �7 °�*0.''''..,y�''�..:5�•��,��t O1.VlI RE6N1= 537E NUMBER: Iii:::I v <' 3 °e:43 'r:.'�2�'e-q,:$' n"�aa •c Y$>: 'u`aaEn e,..m WA 0200 S.roWahl! +�a°.l t Qa..u.4'a. 3.«'y' ` rtreae�4""•.� HAZEN E TOM m.+t1T CAMEO IIRL®ro WALLED mOn6�ni PETAL rMR r'''''°` tlPAROwn.Gr TOP - Nsnw,o�w.T,raoRAao.ro rERPr ALL rder Reamvstn �D eona ARD� PEP RLOA,nN IOIEgaIEFT A-;RaE,000bUL P O PIATPOI p EQUIPMENT DETAIL ^FOUNDAtION SECTION Pr•f4 ♦ 11 , GRAVEL PATH \ \ - ' CRAYEL r nT1\:.".,M1 .' CCP.w+m.PEE ` _A_: wcra w / PRc:cam°AR LaR: I \/ , ,.... \ 1 LNc Face 10 A7 ak Ai .\/ \ /• \ ,5. .2-...•.,.. \ . ( •--- / !MOTH.. S TREE I g ig s j . . . . . ..)Igo o I / . . . . .. ' . / . . . . . i i i I ARCxi1$ N LR-- --- ---_------------RJ i . . . . . EA Fir, •p Oar.PAD Y. n•r / —� DIMENSION BTS // A-1 ,� EQUIPMENT PLAN [ / PARTIAL SITE PLAN er, DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • . , --- ' . . IMMIIMIMI •• • IIII:4 • • • St=M,EML COMO=TO MS IMITNP SINTZ IS icumr.id IIMM VERIIT IIMAL ACM.ORIENTA1121 OW M9-5/11 • mom TO ectanecnot. . . IMM CM 1MM GP AMNIA ME=MMII TOP a.ANOVA& NSW PLAIPMM TO TM GRINTAND ,,..1, Fire. ANTONIA 11/70Pt. Mt OP cP ME NOP. ...,s........__....r&stm=1 • TOP CP PCPCVOLE . '"Nk III 1111111 1 CZ‘NI'MrO=MX .1/4 to.e."‘"'"'' 11111111i1111 uerunt 20.11.MOM . . \ ,. PAML*EWA ,........• , \/ .1,,.... _ . • OP PLATPOPPI Pon ern -- - 'gt•t: /AIM..TOTAL Milt EXIST..,Ctlelq l'..'"' ,...kwo.,.,N / , 111111! , Ps.,POR,•-wrewas MOTOR C•TVA i:::iiiSigiiiiia, / 11 IIIIN.il 111 EMMY • IL CAIECISNAL PANEL ACH•04 / ..•''....':$"4,..::•.'.../ a/NNIM PANS /•A....,,,,:::.,dill,4:4, 1111.1. =M1 MITE NAMES MCM•V CANNER ens:TA1.0200T 7:3 ;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::. . .:-• PATEL AMWAY ..• 511AMI°13°LE/E NUMBER: 5.R. NAME: HAZIEN . NOWA AMNIA AMR MIII=E=111 . ' ___/ • PLA11.0101 Alto. OP raropmm em SOP OMAPIMAWMPEM I . , Fa.conicam.NO . - E EMS..TRIMS RANGE - Mori 36141.TO ii-kb, g ANTENNA PLATFORM 1, . V•P.P-I• i 5 1 g g 0 . .. .... .32114 MEL M F.F. EIMLIM1 NT I 004- \Exisvr,.=AAA. (- de \\A. , 9 - '4 I 144 . III I .b g itii<oili, 4 \\. •--------,:'\ .--- )77 \ .41 l'7 ,/ . . • ,,k„,, ..... • -. - 0 ,,..._ (a.,-,) i - - .___, le,' % % • ,. .41 9 /4,441 4D) . . . b • 1 @ \ \ .,,,, . @ - -- ,,- \ \ @ .., / 4 .... I—46/ . .1 • • . , . .• • , ., ... / 0) ....6..: • .\-‹ 0 •[:•. 1.• 0 • A. 4 . # / • # # .....mm -,: / . •..• * / II • • • II ExisnNe.l'ICAOPCLE . .-- - @ .,. .. •. • l* / • • • • • MIIMII 7 • Ex191,0 EMAP,ENT OTC..MILOS.. • ,/,--.----\ Ilt .. .. . ....: : ,..._.••,.. -- • .‘ CO ..., . ;........- . // AlICKI4148N • • • • • PENCE-vERIPT•Mtr.o.•T l . . .... i mu MAN LNG / 11 0 (9) / FIN= 44 ' ' ':''. r ' .. .. Of MI If MI I I \ '"'' ••• ••••• 0) (111// Mr m-IM .......• , ...... c•ASOEn. 1 il lig --i' :i / A-2 g EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 . LANDSCAPING PLAN I me WY•NV, RECFnirPn AUG 6 1397 iimmimm ....... . . DEVELOPiviENT PLANNING . - - CITY np • I. 4TW �ng • • .ALL PIPES TOYOIRums.common, tOTT EIAO.MT c0201.GT TO TIE PTQOACD LATWT 10011 TO PT01-f39WD MB z.CT.O 0.DEta ab IIt S CflE e3 Am ICED. ILAIDaIAIE TO O IDT-0A•Pm DALYAI®Da67E OIAE]Y18101ED. 0_, •.• A J IITAMOD Cr W M. , 0. MTALL ALL PTUr NV MD •N A TDILDbE.04 1TYPICAL 10EL DM00 are co IOa MALETA•P 001AE0000I0000 dew...LALLY IOCATED A. - comma ow AHEM LOLA CODES ma IIL .ATIOO TA.0 r1ED:OP12 A.PLAIN AM NOT TO x er_LLED.TI(aE PLANE AAE ertew®ro LE A . wrsE ro aneme 110 J.EVIC >�a DYDEMTYTIC antic WILEE ONLY lEaE001ci®ormwee v aA 6ALY. LADLES 1VNIn®.30 Y I ®u TJF wA m FETAL ALLm or AL etl0c aw TO maotw m re NAa. 33 Tar TILE UV PTi41EZT TIE i� LL ALL MC.TYPE]CEEB1r I)D MALL NAY!A DM COAL EIrPORf W VIIM TN a•MOO llaT a1n+Ei pMII I1TAlAre Lr'I••ml0 0100 nil.AT n AI aTa I elaue ow COED TTOpLs yyT1AT]•-e. �YYj .•..MAI.aEI Q AOOIIBaare ML11.1.MD!EA'®L4•. OG Y C MID ILE•r TO a• IOIE]aNIALL OE roe•. APPIEDYIs EauL :............... :..... �.`- EEw ro.IaaN GRAM I.ALL aTNaEIE WAl1 d CusOLDATIBO m MESIII vEIAATIwI W �. •:•r.• :. ...... ... L ::. `MN O ATIOI a 0T 3E ICE1E PL O PRAclita.30C. ECU t �.. ;;i � �1 ALt 1� T� 'Y:_ 'f" � KT7�'-1 1T'. '1E. WE MADED S.ALL COLD YEa3IIIMOr MEATIaA Oa LPIElE PLAaTENT MALL EE N AOCOIOAN IS¢RN ALL ETAIDAIOD _ A. a01=ABM TO i10 PPESOME M NEAT OOMC M CQrAL:1CD _w l WDE AEN'{{A I 6TRII!RN 411E • OT1ECI1RAa raL AA/TOYED Or P101ECT AMUDEILL S - LIR RADIDC ■ w O1A.P001M•DATE o.�1QE1C rWII6•TTr 0.�n AO NAND Wien rc EOAIIaI OWL®3OTACIED - -. AND GORED Pa9TIINIINI re DIA IDOTIO SW ?�I_1,1 .-.-^T-;--i=S=u-n'-"n=ii=n'-'Ii=d=l7=ir. LIE POT ELVA r SITE AT t T� . A IADOA 2012 AON ALL oanRo1 20A1101 M To BE I�1DN9 TO A -..- =;M=11-1bp,M-M_II=M-I-i=l-i-Ii-i_.. DPM Cr Y EE<aM GRADE. I DDOE!TE rAD ld3*13MDLLL NDIEJ MONOPOLE L�TM POST DLI�R POaT�]-W OD.FM.e6EDY 4.10a 20 no aT1E GEE SCE]•IE 61RAdUO TO ORAIEL CMY QUOE* !l��A VI,G L All 0040020 ST10 ewaL M Aam Aso GRADE M Ewa 0.11004 TO 13111300100 or1 LEE Porn]-W OD.PIM 3OED Y AETnaEO I.DAIE®ulC DONE mwgD II-N DO TM]Dlm nEE TO MATuI fACRC ` Am/Am AM OT[B1 Pill fAIDO WE DPECEGTIOEt 0@ AND 0E0 Le LADLED 1 DATE AIM6 LW OD-DO®W AD1MA•Di UM M DA,4 R.00 erAOE]a1 ATA:01.TEITY BOOR! WA NUMBER: 4 TOP AND RAIL. TE Mu DTN-0/CE RA I OD.PsD ea Af 4 II. L DATE LATCH.I- E OD.rL O EEa we MTN pi010011 nee coo0E CATCI/ M.R.MANE HAZEN O GENERAL NOTES &CABLE RUN SECTION ,STANDARD FENCE 4 GATE DETAIL imilimt P•FM• P•EJ• low•P0 st E t • A 1 • E C E O AAA a m • • • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■\ ARCHI4128 . ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ um a A-3 IiirlISRtAM• rano • • — — — — — — DEVEUL}A vPLA , ONEN6T 199N7N ING• — CITY OF RPAITrw i - i • •`. ' 1,•• REAT ETLRT CaIEOTEM •.0 O,AID A(USE GIRD - 11•C7 Cif At4N1�V1AT10!l/6TMY71 R T-NO•WEIRD ELT.erm WOW SPACED m SEC © mot IMIN 0T0• Cl COPPER Q newt Ewa OE OVDRlAO1-1 FOR SWALLOW o EaNRTpNI ArRERd mNlaaE .es Furs,TTP. TTPILAL pJ JILZCN IDDR OC. OR CENTER - A,T1YJL AIDLYYIb TEOPPr.ICL. az I I IDGNV..NYv DCT OrW N:O. LawrGILT ® WI•EnAL TEL'WPtAO.G Gw arNEe I�_ M.C.E.•. asOE 11.DV■EECMIMINIMMI E,uDT.pTeTDp D� PONTIGN AS�® OD. NEWTED T01T1 DdWFp IDP t.0 Y, NANA. WWI S ID�L DINETER CP TIE MART. it YEATIIERMICN Pw rtrMM �T•�■_IrxDEr AOaiOe mlG� �, t..0 o,aro.ru w aeo RNDENEE weT IST 1yp1�• Ao PNOLC U11LTT ®D■CLNEGT Wirrw ro•r.roNrNunoN1 I 1 1 Q WEE MOQeTOR DRT ICT-I G]_S EGE ARRESTOR O CAGE"ROD © NAM waa I I asizeo N TOP i �•� eu VD GPM ESE.n,�.e. ESE. LD!A COO PAD r.C.TT 1 L-� I _ ]dY PANEL °m"P �.E1Erevaf eme MOLT TO TQ>T• L 01'� _ amor PAD _L�t��S\- 43 RAIC.N TTA JAR T.WOO PO AGE ALL NU OPPECT KLUGE ■ �.l DrfRMIZ t TO TIE EOYD•NEM ME TO Q NI.009lE"`ATA9rR10P GOWN X•WWI CLEARANCE I DEWED.INSTALLED ELECTRICAL L DIAORQT ID Nit NOTATION OILT.REV=AID MGR PON WE DPECIP C OClORIOE SITE NAME: TO rat WPGIi1 DULDw IWr EERY=CLEWS CODE. D� plr No ANY DDSTIN{CTla4 a.a.PROTECTIVE DEWED swi.mare AN wr,wriND ROM raw.TO as GRGAT!,Twl Ta AT 1 T DAORNM ARE DONSATC OCT.ACTUAL 1DUO W ALL EDPRENT WALL I LOCATE WARD roe AINOII7CERµ n..Aa 5A0@O DOAIO TO AAE.Aa.IE WOE ON WIT alaENT.SE PIONS ITOW GO DN EWER rtoGrAD11RR'i RECRTaOED CONTROL cant OM TELU10!GTU,IT REDEN EIO4 ALL DIMAC ARE. �LEIE t MONOPOLE VAGRANTS OR CONTRACTORS Arnow"W¢P DRAWEE OOD[N TO DE WOO ELECT NATIONAL STON WALL EC GROECED N ACCORDANCE iDN TIE v,G APrToIALD ON ALL MENEM NO CGTIR M D DIAGRAM 1 SEE OWLS!DAGLwi T ED MEET FOR ADDITIONAL NOR ATICN 1 LOOM W WALL DE RATED NSA I. W e1ALL DE SITE NUMBER: WOOER MOWED ENCLO ARE WOW ED. RATED rlrlA RE WA 020E GENERALNDTE° ®ELECTRICAL SUPPORT BOARD &ONE LINE DIAGRAM S.R. NAME:ZEN -t COORDINATE CLORC YETI RELIC NEDFILE COTANY.rww•oEn- yr.r: HA- P•P • U.ma.WALL se COTOE TILNTIIIR^DILATED OOPPEIR 'ICI A ALLOW PM WOW 000DIDN• N { W. T ST. 4 CLNIIiALTaI WALL PAT ALL POEM rBPrsx,OD 6NALLQ I �EAAMw.T IEd OASIS TOEO RIM a OMAN ALL P DIED E,GOO1L0■SEPECTIGN No OEITA CLIL0ro CORERS APPIEIVAL • •f 4 ALL ELECTRICAL MOW MALL OG1'POIM TO TO ITMIINNBLR Q • 11740 Rt WTNYN DDrtm AIlA■A PIQAIXAGlD M NATIONALOCA CO GORE NEC fIDS!)m 06Lm EaOPITHIr WW1 DAW®AIIAID PART I ' ArPLIG1RC LOGY.COOl4 FER3 CD•WEL oSEW=ENTRANCE RATED. O. ALL n or+�..nags WALL CQ 11L APPROVED OR LUTEat l00 NTl. IIZAO.seal rNAm D WRE. TIE EOYRBR GDEflT PADGYi MCA ,„ T. ALL WWI NODE DE S1ILDD0 WALL RD•Si EriT.ALL LOG 0.rte.E ♦-- WIZ N A uEAnlR•INDn J `• 11 WE AIUDPn WALL DE GALVANIZED RSm STEEL COONS NO -I I -III- EDI Mall SAM • .TER T.D. 4 LOT INDUCED ALL LADDR AND PATDDOLD DESOEDED DT DRAWEE 1 I I-_ 1 -EWE VATED . D04i2 N.WrcrcoPL DCUDInDiplNrALinwcroPROVDEL?RLr g 'G -I III WINED TAPE DDT� � 1� r-- • rro.T— § OPEWATED A10 APPROVED ELECDGCAL STWTETL $Q g D I I I • MINERAL LS�alwwa NOTE■. 8 I .I I I I I lie E G•O1PODn LAYOD MAT AIR O!TO BEE M ECO=000505. ' a 11E DuaDDG GROW LOCATION DIY1L GE AHTipVEp e1r WE PROJECT `-•ECTICW'5CO11tr6Y DTI KAi.NOTT'Y ECt 0ANKA3[OF ANT DOLTEE NULLED TIE i. 'i HE I- PK.f111TIL1rT • I I I I �w I i WOWED SYSTOT MC TO STE OR SOIL GC•OI11O1. I. —1 =1 1I as m ac w I I•I L rARaL.TEST.CONTRACTOR STALL ApOE TENT o TiC rNOLoio ^ -I I 'III d PLAN ON • - -�1 I I I I �a OTW IEt OT A MEWED MUDD AGENT. PROM!DOEPEOPET TEST �1- DTI®{y 00p e) I 1 MOLTS TO ME P CUECT rtomeAR FOR RENE➢L IEEWS TO DE CAOVONi OWE RWSTANCE TO EARN WOW WALL Nor EXCEED D am P M GNOIEO TEST tans TIE ENGINE CP W CUE ♦ -I r•TELDYI 0 CDOIIR. MOTE . . . I - 1 C:OATRAL Oi WALL DE 6C/ryV•V r TO PENCE dDDITIO4L • -)- GROW cwlcnaNe m PEWEE. I =11 smoimmo i III I II as m WLYN O•N PLAIN mco SERVICE IL- J-I D LEDE 0 ALL WOW ONE WALL EC TN COATED N0 GREW PALLAT®WIRE, , . 1_uLEWe 011ERUEE NOTED.rNmi+ee GROPED CRONY•-TOYS TO T!Q!0 - I v) ( ) = GIOV W N NID �0�m DOICATED ON GROUNDED FLAW GROW FWD WALL E@ 'I am1E.Rroe -1°ErADCK£D EaVF'@lT DADDItTS COPPER CLAD STEER.RAW AT WC"WAON1 FFONDE TEWT as XIT IWODB m WO.POST LEAiDIELLN m POCATED. � ( 1 Cp•r"CI19 SAND 5 PRO-EECT MANAGER 11 a) ratrorpo W,ALL Amvecnme MEW*Gi aNDDa caleDroRD • 1-11 III-1 I-1 I-1 I 1-1 1 WALL DE 0001E-1Y1 COPFffOWON TTt£ALL AND MOWED ENTERICR GR•IPONG C0EECTO!TO PE IMAMENT Ea1PPE4T - •, AND PIA. e K rO TSWEPT ' O MN - lOCATED. aEecGASKET DM PANE TO OW LORDCLEAR r &NTAOZSS STEM WEEP-TAr0G WOADO u O DQ0LE-LIn CQ' o. CONNECTORS.YEW,COPEGTON LOCATI00 NO MATERIAL TYPES t°CAA.TO REG RED DER N TO EEO P'OWWS.GALVANIC CORiODgN ,OR G.0 Un NO i�D I.�LOCAL 51LITIES.TRENDED TEaAIm•vTE ONE LINE DIAGRAM DIE VERGOOD" 'OIIE"WIT°OLO iDE NEE DART Lan MRlm.'�^ �TRENCH DETAIL PANEL OPTION crTPANT rADO-ITOD /0 N LE I I IM•SPACNi ).f�1uDH +T CONTACT r.r� P.O ,l A 9 AM SOLID GIRL•u.0 D•G►OT LOG BOWL Lln um LUC-DOR W.10.E•r MOLE WAGED TALC-'AI N•10.E I I NA•N.A.. • -WSW 2 COAX OWS tAR ATW 20 4 PEALED - TAOR.AYG SOLED WE USE WEPT LOY ELYSEL L. MTV 0M RODEN aECTO.LGLATIOND TALC-EtA VP IQE•SW SP.341 . ENDI Tom-t VDV.LE.1. PSPACSG AAOO 1 i I i , r, ,w .�•i T.MC�OlW st• eTIGDx•. I`„iANTRA RADcraRm NnLSTeD, .■:■.■:■: WOW.TTIP) NEWT PRODUCT%EN NOE=MANAGER v AWALL SE LL DOLl4 MASERS STEEL NO NUTS IaED ON CiNOrO1Y,WfECT1O! i 1 1 11 �L'OAX DEMO DM IT TOEER MITE � �� U W, WOOLLY.ALL O GW10P0 000L'TORD NULL DE RCVTED 1•i 1 I/1 I f 1 1 , N PVC RACEYAT.PAL RALEWGT MAT DE PL.DMELE OR FWD. TO 1RANWTION VAULT ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ GROW CONDUCTORS WALL NOT MARE CGNTACT DIM ANT METALLIC TO v GENE GRAM RTPICJU -4Nw O10TRNPrC RACEWAY • • • ■■■ COW..!{EBACES OR EDP. •r-a/ Gm+O racE cXr 50 MET Mr) IE�u D.am�n EfLI,WUrrOE WARD WWI, _r(TrW E'LD OWECT'I1001UEIi WEE l-//- -. @1SIa IUr aRua FOR TWEEDIER EaNPTEHT GROW SIEDOIIONS PA_ - P PROVIDE !! WILD a TO FaE0ATb1 REED! A E 7 CAROM PER LCCA @R ITT 15eG•L WERVICe GRODE rR L.FOR ETLRT CN CWT. �GROOO ROD AT RVAL5O CT WETIES TSPETAIL■wRD310.3 RE aLY, AT rINEVtr NTEIRND OR CT RODEmIE YEW PRO.CCT MOCIE �a°�^° ®GROUNDING DIAGRAM R E C f P T Q E r, •..�.••°°��• Eson IIIMIIIMMIll Ails r 1397ei '_ At ti PLANNING - — — CITY OF RENTON 1 1 1 1 I 1 I ' I lj` e ze oez-se J i , ;ail sae Honey Dew_ , .ha12, I21 �; ^ sz m Q I,• 0� ri; 'sovo9 r D° a" .;4i;r n yJNs�la CENTRAL a i 41 W E II F. 0ID�u�,- I HIGHLANDS PLAZA ��yy 121 1 (11 1y , .Q 7'"'-- 6 s !, v • was n° s :3) 4O MAa9 a rr0 e ° ry a J I, ®© tHw _Q s die ^ 1. ; ,. ®® 1 -Qa I21 131 fll o (Wo O 11, 0 ® I as P ( ol,3, A =30-25 " n •yMT6Mt"" 5aMe .—e.°.f-ICE!=,r, i�_ _— �.I r.::12 cr_,..,r...�b I� iT^P-B-P:R-rN�e.- itMNS.= tHE„--ES T. _—___ -�A\ 9'1nE—•o - .3712125.72,7 L�J Jom,w Mayen d+ JF c1 I.SIA 3 W.�i7 9lnylet �`�" 2/112�20,mug ''''1.1. —_ - -----�s 091 R0e- r _d I ` to MCCa..z,dale,' 065Ac®� I y+ c `CI C� zsr.ir r'I „0, iJames W.Ha Iti HF.erdemen o 11 5.001 Dist 403 !o -- J t e 1.49Acf° 0-? a .. nee. 5 ®I'i 131A I' L..71 ka��i•.�e ® �.of I M.1ored .Aides 2,Sd AC IA. 0.11A[R „� _ I ,„EIV.g ) B,, ,,i0,01 , . „. 1.41 Ac ojjl ,ro1- IIQ - 'R. 1 1, w a®IQ w �5te..s f u «.. , .•�.Y'.e�:-�v� _y'faj�)I_ I0eAc 00s I� oo - 2 i Johnnie L8 945 191Ac Mc_,,o, ,z Lloyd A Hon9nolt ¢ i _ ' .0 dn`2'•-- ," trA'r229� a 'i o i „Claudel JA Bu[hard 09,Ac I _ Y '®Vted6; At25 fie. a4s eors�R,dgley w 110 v '11� ' '1 >so, ©s.. se02 Q 8'Ul MO I I9 Aa Q �� s --- .4 r L' x Edward M.Klein I.96Ao ®i ® - (j0 „,® „O- " 61,01 ST" ,�m1n 2S.E. 116TH .0SS• x 2,,tE,S.E.1orH 116TH sr ST. 1 ",r ma' It c' nas, ' fie;n ___ " �_o..' ..' —or' 0 iF,oa�% 0C 1 ® 9 2 i= 1�a.� ® ii m .sii M ? a°I �7 -'4. 'a x zlam D I1 LI ii ,so ci:•e, - rxe[r. r �t0 oxt 1 tc Z 1Ie." a \.,6 3:14 N s.. m,e�0 4.72 Ac _f-= -- Dli 9 ..„,,r, .� Ill .SN R.Lamper60tan I 2,67 Ae. �~' I, W mon ..e° 1 NIRtH 1" 1"•400�� i il.'y„ .,a 3 jl,, 16 r x . t611 a ® S.E. ❑g ,w fl�ft m. __u_ °N6152N suT...ins.�_ TN xST S.E. 116 ST I nr x. 1i ,w,• L'• -I«(? •"��°Tr,;,�f a �..._,... '{.�,.,�.. • I I ' I I1 faux,,®LASS DV AREA MAP SITE PLAN "O.CASE WYRI O60' TEL RISER J��'C� A/15/9r FWNO 3"BRASS DISK /�—t . STOM0fl*4 CURB(71' ]2939' CONC POST]-up N / /-YANMOLE N.(TYP.) Q 5 2er 85' a/15/9r SCALE: 1'= 400' SCALE: 1'= 20' �W.RD See 3B]D E NE 12TH STREET 9 0 20.148 Nm,t 53 _� SITE IO 2644 5!' 3'- - ----� 10' II NO 1 �— —�_ MIND BM A/1!/9r ter 85 BOLLARD 3D RO IS 02).'1ENT .ONE 0850*SCu W>r — — B PPCEv ENT • (MOT„PER ASSESSORS RAP) LLOCAPON PER Af f1$5.4827 ALf� ,. RANSCORYER ilfr' ''. ‘"' TJ —faxo pK NAIL P u POWER KU `v /R1a =3 BRASS u0427 SKA 8 n AND CdWITl 521 ) 4/15/97 d NORTH90E E.I. NO/ OWBLE — TCL RISER TL eLOG ALDB SYNC ND/(TYP) —tom 1 f Kld d CATE! )11hA „AA 6 3 AIN ANTENNA53. / \ \ d564106 CH YKK 1 1 A e ' / .0 \ 9 110 Q' FENCE . FOUND BAR i 1 /1 1 / / ) FOUND BAR AND CM IVCAP 62: T 'In 1 , / / /15/9r v fe.22/ / /' / �?/ 68a22 w '/ / / / _ /9 / M1 y �$ �M1 w95 - / 3 8 n // / / 88.392:• / / Z %N // � / / nPP Q S2r 1/ //A- �/ I 8 // „ 8 i/ / / /• / P /'WND BAR M1 ry ' N88.3845 1 i 4/IS/RI / Q M1 N - SLRNY PT �X .h 0115 / +10%• - / 0422 // =NN0 BAR / / AND CAP —�/ / A/!/9r 0.22 / BRIAN LINE(TY0) / ..,./../ t 2585 r0' 10 i 15 5e802'42'E -_ 26+2.54' 10i t IS 588208e-E !I TA T ]Br 38' —1 Se8'!8 SIFE SITE INFORMATION CAUTION! i TM LOT NDLBER� tIpJR9-R 8I-09 BIKKED UfUnES EfosT 0 THE AREA s9re ADDRESS ttaa 13tNN Avt38lE g SURVEY POINT 1115 AND DnuTY*FORMATION SNOT*NA. SUNSET A SEiE COIRACT IIp fAW(ae)2Do-avo YApe3aT30'089"V12299']O6-WELEv_aaToCALI 8754W LOC:TEcsca.AiCE A IINA,tia aiyu ' .s�A NODS SF. won+no'o9.s-N 122c9',s2w a.e NouRs paloR rD cdsWCTICN E� t ex LEGAL DESCRIPTION1-800-4245555 �g� TREELEGEND LEGENDC nONM2r3 FEET CF iME WEST MALE CfTHEEASTNALfaTHE8 0N0 tY WAS DEIBVED F]i01t 0 _ 0PK BExPHALT 5061-rAST WARTEFC!ME0o0100ESTWAFTERWSECTIONt0. K D courvn CONTPOL SURKr OF SECTION DECIOUWS TNCE POWER LINE(BURIED) PK W ASP.ALTTOWNSxiP 2]„OFT„PANGE5EAST,w.u,WqxCCWNivL.ALDER —� POWER UNE OVERNEAOIEIEv .0WASNIxGiON: 10.TWN 23 N.RNG S E..WN. POLE npE�I`TRUWt DIANEIER Orv)NP.NAPLE N PO POWER LE OP INCHOp EKCEP(ME'MST a3 FEETFDf 00 AKNUESCUTNCAST a52.uNWUER CREST SNORT PLAT,RECORDED DS.DECIWCUS ►3(p LIGHT POLE/LU4INAIPE *SOOT BENCH uARN STAUPEO COVETED TO KINC COUNTY Br DEED UNDER RECOROINC N0.638rr2) OEP Af/BIOfi129001,RECOf105 6 • .0ADPONA G— GAS UNE GP1rO9D-rt LOCAreO Ai THE KING CWNM1,WASMNGTd OK-OAK INTERSECTId Of SR 90 AND STUAIE IN THE CWNir Cf KING.STAre Of WASwNCid,AS PER tYRSi 3.KROLI YAP a THE WEST HALF OF SECTION HE fOiN ST EKRGREEN TREE EN.dERRY d5 VALVE AYCPICAN PRE INSURANCE ECYPANY COueDTUCNT fOR TITLE NO N3]8]-5 10.TYFI.23 N.RNG']E..W M SR s0l.BELLE WE.WA DES PHONE NE (OVERHEAD/ ELEN.]IeaS 9 18 CE-C WAR m TELE9NWE MANHOLE GS PLAN DOES NOT REPRESENT A BWNOAPY SURKY „AIEN of_oGua.s FR — SEVER LINE REVISIONS TOP EL IF YEAsuREO NC•NEULOCY SEWER CLEAN OUT 7Fr i}•/EF SCHOOL PI.RNE 0ATCH BANN - lI�l11C f117//1)11�/"11I1 ECALA. TREE —CO---_ STORY DRAW I DATE' DESCRIPTION BT NOTE: TREE ORIP LINES ARE NOT TO SCALE. 1PEE W TCR LINE ME*,REFERENCE TRUNK LOC.!.OB,Y. A TER vwLK dCR �...e a v�y VICINITY MAP FUNK OIAYETERS WERE APPROMATED AT -9- nPE MTp ANT 15'f0 ABOVECPWND LEKL TREES LESS ■ WATER NETER NOT TO SCALE MAN B-NOT LOCATED EXCEPT AS SNOAN CHAIN UNK FENCE DRAWN:DAv,yzD.ic^a: /st/9r '". j52 a9 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PRO,ECT:96160:092T tl - 18 li c - —C 9r 1.. r L • • • 1AU .6 1997 DcVELOPMt•IVT❑i ..... • Consulting �II Group, Inc. TELECOMMUNICATIONS FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 14, 1998 FAX NUMBER: 1-425-277-4455 TO: Mark Pywell NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 City of Renton FROM: Al Kirsininkas BRIG.TO FOLLOW: No RE: GTE Wireless PCS -- Hazen -- Pcs Site WA0206 - LUA97-103,(0-H THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS ARE ENCLOSED: One (1) Recorded Landscape Buffer Agreement PURPOSE/COMMENTS: Attached per your request is a copy of the Landscape Buffer Agreement for the above mentioned site, with the recording number along its side. Please let us know if there are any other items that are necessary prior to the issuance of the building permit. Please contact me at 206-992-1687 in order to briefly discuss the next action items to be taken in processing this permit. I appreciate your time and attention to this matter. 1282E Northup Way Suite 301 • Bellevue,WA 98005 Telephone: (425) 895-1440 • Fax: (425) 895-1441 i00 'd IVH-S68-SZb:131 40:S1 (Q3M) 86 ,VI- .NVP After recording return to: SE123 May Creek Real Estate Administrator ' , Interstate Mobilephone Company dba Cellular One 617 Eastlake Ave. E. Seattle.WA 96109 LANDSCAPE BUFFER AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Interstate Mobilephone Company, d.b.a Cellular One ("Tenant") entered into a Site Lease Agreement with Robert E. Fricks and Donna C. Neal ("Landlord") on November 12, 1992 to lease a portion of their property for the construction of a cellular communications facility; and WHEREAS, the City of Renton Planning Department has recommended as part of Application LUA-93-002-CU;ECF;V Conditional Use Permit/Height Variance Approval that substantial buffers be maintained around the cellular facility; and WHEREAS, the Landscape Buffer granted herein and described below shall run with the Property, described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and shall be appurtenant to and for the benefit of the Premises as described in Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE Grantor covenants that it will not, for the term that Grantee maintains and operates its cellular communication facility on the Property and Premises, cut, remove, endanger, divide or diminish any significant trees currently existing on the Grantee's Premises ("the Landscape Buffer). If Grantor, at any time now or in the future expresses the need to remove any of se the currently existing significant trees; it will do so only with written notice to .4 Grantee and the Renton Planning Department, and with the.Planning '4 Department's prior consent. Grantee may assign this Landscape Buffer upon notice to Grantor. The terms hereof shall apply to and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administr tors, successors and assigns. 402ix.144 GRANTOR: By Robert . Fricks,Its owner 0 -C BY Donna C. Neal its o ner GRANTEE interstate Mobilephone ompany By Robert H. Johns Its General Manager ZOO 'd TH/1-368-3Z6 '13,L 90:31 (03M) 86 ,VI- 'NYP r EXHIBIT A to the Landscape Buffer Agreement dated ,-i�j / , 1993 between Robert E. Fricks and Donna C. Neal (-Grantor") and Interstate Mobilephone Company The Premises is described as follows: _J 1 -i d l a 1 I I 0 Vf �(�[`- o I 0 1 `" II q III It. 1 II I 1 ac111 Ui lil Ili 1 ief 11W11 •end 11VAno . I - 1 .tl 14-017 , ',el P I` Q(i za. z •r, m 7 ' ,el 1 c f- I. I. Q po 1 ` .�1 i ^' I c. -� In 1II1 ,--; c c. 1 . I ' ` � N •1• 11 Ln 1 I _n N- t l Ill yln LLLlllfff . _ 1�1 1 I II , r I l/ i C� 1J iv 111•7I V.,0i rr.��4 Avf kit L-t. to Cd rr S V /.)- � Fmmt, .2 f 6/NA7D N Garmac.- 8t. Al uI b/11-i-/ A-tg -g-b UtiffV ,8i /..4,4-4/2- my/3 1 7e-flm'7. 1 1 1 1 i 11 200 'd I398-L29-90Z '191, df10E0 ON1J f1SNO0 W P L0:81 (NOW) L6 ,Si- '030 I i EXHIBIT B the Landscape Buffer Agreement dated k v�Z�S I 1993 to p 9 between Robert E. Fricks and Donna C. Neal ("Grantor") and Interstate Mobilephone Company The Property is described as follows: THE NORTH 275 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. , IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 42 FEET CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY FOR 138TH AVENUE S.E. BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 6387727. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON 600 'd 1S98-H9-90Z:1h dflONO ONIJ/IfISNO0 W P L0:8i (NOW) L6 ,SI- '090 • c: �'' °E t CIT:Ic =)F:RENTON ..LL 7 : : Hearing Examiner Jesse Tanner,Mayor Fred J.Kaufman January 5, 1998 Mr. Steve Welton JM Consulting Group • 12828 Northup Way,#301 Bellevue, WA 98005 Re: GTE PCS MONOPOLE ON DUvALL - FILE No. LUA97-103, CU-H,V-H Dear Mr, Welton: The Examiner's Report and Decision on the above referenced matter, which was issued on December 11, 1997,was not appealed within the 14-day period established by ordinance. Therefore,this matter is considered final by this Office and the file on your application is being transmitted to the City Clerk as of this date. Please feel free to contact this office if further assistance or information is required. Sincerely, G Fred J. Kaufman Hearing Examiner FJK/mm cc: Mark Pywell Sandi Seeger,Development Services I , 200 Mill Avenue South- Renton, Washington 98055 - (206)235-2593 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King ) MARILYN MOSES ,being first duly sworn,upon oath, deposes and states: That on the 11th day of December ,1997, affiant deposited in the mail of the United States a sealed envelope(s) containing a decision or recommendation with postage prepaid, addressed to the parties of record in the below entitled application or petition. Signature: C717/q411— �yy,/ C _� SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this II* day of , 1997. Notary Public ' and for the State of Washington, residing at ,therein. Application, Petition, or Case No.: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall LUA97-103,CU-H,V-H The Decision or Recommendation contains a complete list of the Parties of Record. c - ..).4.. ,., • 4 .... 1 " , 1, • ,,, lr .,* , •1 { . . 1 ... i 7 .4if 14 ft• 1 ' sli -.) .t, 4 .4 -.1- .1 .•:. -II '4. ,r. ,...., .4. III• .4., Ii. . llt it 1 . l 1 A 1,',• ;S. 4.. .0. ,... 11 . -4,44 1'11 :'1,• .t. 1 .4..4 ':.1.1. ' '14 414- 4 , 41 ii1 •-.....i0 '1.. II 4I '..14 ... ,,...0 I, I t ID 111 I'l. .4•440 11 .41. 1 4 11 . . - 4 ..,, 1 4.. ,.... 1 I 1 - HEARING EXAMINER'S REPORT , . December 11, 1997 OFFICE OF THE REARING EXAMINER CITY OF RENTON REPORT AND DECISION APPLICANT: GTE GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall File No.: LUA97-103,CU-H,V-H LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SUMMARY OF REQUEST: To construct a PCS facility with 120 foot monopole r. SUMMARY OF ACTION: Development Services Recommendation: Approve with conditions DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT: The Development Services Report was received by the Examiner on September 23, 1997. PUBLIC HEARING: After reviewing the Development Services Report, examining available information on file with the application,field checking the property and surrounding area;the Examiner conducted a public hearing on the subject as follows: MINUTES 7 The following minutes are a summary of the November 18, 1991/hearing. The legal record is recorded on tape. The hearing opened on Tuesday,November 18, 1998, at 11:14 a.m. in the Council Chambers on the second floor of the Renton Municipal Building. Parties wishing to testify were affirmed by the Examiner. The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing the original Exhibit No.2: FAX dated November 17, 1997 application,proof of posting,proof of publication and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No.3: Renton City Council Minutes dated Exhibit No.4: Proposed City ordinance November 10, 1997,page 366 Exhibit No.5: Vicinity map and site plan Exhibit No.6 Elevation drawings The hearing was continued from a previous hearing on September 30, 1997, in order for the City Council to amend the ordinance to allow this project to proceed. This use is prohibited within 300 feet of a residential zone in the existing ordinance. There has been a first reading of the ordinance which would allow this project due to the fact that there are existing cellular antennas of equal height already on the site. GTE GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall File No.: LUA97-103,CU-H,V-H December 11, 1997 Page 2 The staff report was presented by MARK PYWELL,Project Manager,Development Services,City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,Renton, Washington 98055. A SEPA review was conducted on September 2, 1997, and one mitigation measure was attached. The proposed facility is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan (CP)and policies. This site is already used for cellular towers and the third tower in this place will allow the applicant to serve their customers within the area. The project site is heavily forested and the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC)mitigation measure required the retention of the trees to act as a buffer for the cellular towers on this site. The policies also require the collocation on sites whenever possible and this facility will allow for that. The applicant had looked into the feasibility of collocating on the existing poles and found that those poles were already used to their maximum capacity. This site is in the Multi-Family Residential-Neighborhood Zone(RM-N)which is a multi-family zone with a height limit of 30 feet and thus the need for the applicant to submit the height variance request. Other than that, the proposal as it now exists would be consistent with the zoning. Regarding community need, staff does not believe there is an over-concentration of cellular towers on this site. Because the site is well forested, it will screen the use of the site from adjacent roads and the adjacent R-8 zoning. The RM-N zone allows for 45 percent of the site to be covered by structures. This particular proposal with the antenna and the attached boxes that are needed to control the electronics of the operation cover approximately 3 percent of the site. The RM-N zone does require a minimum 15 foot setback;however,the setback may be reduced through the site plan review process by the reviewing official. The project meets all setbacks required by the RM-N zone. Staff believes that the proposed use would be compatible with the existing neighborhood. There is an existing roadway which services the existing towers and it is believed there is no need for a further roadway or more parking area. No traffic impact is anticipated to the adjacent roadways as only occasional maintenance vehicles will be required. These facilities do not produce any noise, glare or light. The existing landscaping forms an effective screen around the facility and only the portion disturbed by construction needs replanting. The applicant seeks to construct a 120 foot monopole with an antenna array on the top. The actual total height of both the antennas and monopole would be 135 feet above ground level. The applicant has requested a variance from the height limitation established by the zoning. The hardship claimed is that in the particular use the applicant needs to project out beyond its line of sight operation. The site itself has trees and other structures that prevent this. The granting of the variance will allow the applicant to construct their facility in a manner that is most compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and existing facilities while meeting the mandate by the FCC to provide their wireless services to the community. This site has been chosen by several carriers now as the most appropriate location for these type of facilities and several variances have been granted by the City to other providers. The applicant feels that the 120 foot tall monopole is the minimum variance that will allow them to construct their facility at this location and provide the coverage to their service area. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and variance with the condition that they comply with the ERC's mitigation measure.' Steve Welton,JM Consulting Group, 12828 Northup Way,#301,Bellevue,Washington 98005, applicant herein, stated that GTE is currently developing a personal communication systems(PCS)network in the Puget Sound area. This particular site is designed to cover the east portion of Renton and hands off to an existing site on Sunset Boulevard and then to proposed sites east,north and south of this site in King County. Regarding need for the height variance,Mr. Welton cited the goals of the ordinance to support applicant's need for this GTE GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall File No.: LUA97-103,CU-H,V-H December 11, 1997 Page 3 facility. Under the existing wireless code,the goals are to encourage the location of towers in non-residential areas,to minimize the total number of towers throughout the community,and to encourage strongly the joint use of new and existing tower sites. He cited several reasons for the height requirement,namely, competition with the existing monopoles to assure equal coverage to their customers, a need to be above the existing trees to provide an effective signal,as well as providing a third monopole for future collocators. The Examiner called for further testimony regarding this project. There was no one else wishing to speak,and no further comments from staff. The hearing closed at 11:40 a.m. FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS&DECISION Having reviewed the record in this matter,the Examiner now makes and enters the following: FINDINGS: 1. The applicant,GTE,filed a request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Variances to locate a 120 foot tall monopole and antennae within 300 feet of an R-8 (Single Family;Lot size-4,500 square feet). 2. The yellow file containing the staff report,the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)documentation and other pertinent materials was entered into the record as Exhibit#1. 3. The Environmental Review Committee(ERC),the City's responsible official, issued a Declaration of Non-Significance-Mitigated(DNS-M)for the subject proposal. 4. The subject proposal was reviewed by all departments with an interest in the matter. 5. The subject site is located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The site is located northwest of Hazen High School. 6. The applicant originally applied for the Conditional Use Permit and two variances. One variance is for a tower that exceeds the 30 foot height limit of the RM-N(Residential Multi-Family Neighborhood) Zone. The second variance was to permit a monopole within 15 feet of an R-8 Zone. The originally scheduled public hearing was continued to allow time for the City Council to consider some changes to the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance. The City Council adopted changes which permit Monopole II(those that exceed 60 feet in height)facilities on sites where such structures already exist. Since an existing facility is located on the subject site the variance to allow the facility within 15 feet of the R-8 zone is unnecessary. 7. Hazen High School is zoned R-8 while the subject site is zoned RM-N. It is the high school's zoning which requires that other facilities already be located on the site before the 300 foot setback may be reduced. 8. The proposed structure will be set back approximately 230 feet from its front property line whereas code permits it to be located within 20 feet of that line. It will observe a 60 foot sideyard setback whereas a 12 foot setback is required. GTE GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall File No.: LUA97-103,CU-H,V-H December 11, 1997 Page 4 9. The monopole with antennae will be 123 feet tall. It will be topped with an antenna array consisting of three(3)sets of four(4)antennae. These antennae will each be 60 inches(5 feet)by 6 inches in size. 10. Support structures will consist of two(2)cabinets approximately 8 feet long,2.5 feet wide and 6 feet tall. 11. The total complex will have a footprint of approximately 800 square feet. 12. Two other cellular towers have been permitted on this site. Both towers support two antennae arrays which staff reports is the maximum possible on any particular tower. 13. The site is heavily forested. That forest cover permits the existing towers and the proposed tower to be screened from surrounding properties. 14. The ERC has required that covenants be recorded to assure that the current trees remain and that any tree removal that might materially affect the screening be reviewed by the City. 15. The City Council approved a similar variance for one of the existing monopoles on the subject site in August 1993. They imposed certain conditions on the Conditional Use Permit at the same time. Those conditions included a five(5)year review and fencing as appropriate(see Council Minutes,August 9, 1993,Pages 345, 346). CONCLUSIONS: Conditional Use Permit 1. The applicant for a Conditional Use Permit must demonstrate that the use is in the public interest,will not impair the health, safety or welfare of the general public and is in compliance with the criteria found in Section 4-31-36 (C)which provides in part that: a. The proposal generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan; b. There is a general community need for the proposed use at the proposed location; c. There will be no undue impacts on adjacent property; d. The proposed use is compatible in scale with the adjacent residential uses, if any; e. Parking,unless otherwise permitted,will not occur in the required yards; f. Traffic and pedestrian circulation will be safe and adequate for the proposed project; g. Noise, light and glare will not cause an adverse affect on neighboring property; h. Landscaping shall be sufficient to buffer the use from rights-of-way and neighboring property where appropriate; and i. Adequate public services are available to serve the proposal. GTE GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall File No.: LUA97-103,CU-H,V-H December 11, 1997 Page 5 The requested conditional use appears justified. 2. The Comprehensive Plan encourages appropriate siting of utilities in general and collocation of cellular facilities. 3. The nature of cellular communications helps define appropriate locales for cellular antenna arrays. They are generally located on high ground or tall structures in order to have clear access to other repeater sites. Since there appears to be a continuing and increasing demand for such facilities,the subject site,with two towers already on it but well screened by trees, appears appropriate. 4. The site is well-screened and covenants attached to existing similar uses as well as separately required by the ERC for this site should insure that such screening remains effective. This screening should minimize undue impacts on adjacent property. 5. It is the screening which helps minimize the out-of-scale nature of 120 foot tall towers in a residential neighborhood. 6. Since the site requires minimal maintenance after construction,there will be little in the way of parking,traffic or noise associated with the finished use. 7. The site will be provided with appropriate utility service for the use. Variance 8. Variances may be granted when the property generally satisfies all the conditions described in part below: a. The applicant suffers undue hardship caused by special circumstances such as: the size, shape, topography,or location where code enforcement would deprive the owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by others similarly situated; b. The granting of the variance would not materially harm either the public welfare or other property in the vicinity; c. The approval will not constitute a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other property in the vicinity; and d. The variance is the minimum variance necessary to allow reasonable development of the subject site. The applicant's property appears ripe for the variance requested. 9. Under the criteria used by the City Council in the earlier decision(File LUA-93-002),the variance is justified. DECISION: The Variance is approved. GTE GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall File No.: LUA97-103,CU-H,V-H December 11, 1997 Page 6 The Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures which were imposed by the ERC prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall enclose the monopole in a fence which meets with the approval of the City staff in consultation with the Renton School District. 3. The permit shall be reviewed within five(5)years to determine whether the technology has changed and there is still public need for the facility. ORDERED THIS 1 lth day of December, 1997. FRED J.KAUF HEARING EXAMINER TRANSMITTED THIS 11th day of December, 1997 to the parties of record: Mark Pywell Steve Welton 200 Mill Avenue S 12828 Northup Way,#301 Renton,WA 98055 Bellevue,WA 98005 TRANSMITTED THIS 11th day of December, 1997 to the following: Mayor Jesse Tanner Gregg Zimmerman,Plan/Bldg/PW Administrator Members,Renton Planning Commission Jim Hanson,Development Services Director Art Larson,Fire Marshal Mike Kattermann,Technical Services Director Lawrence J. Warren, City Attorney Larry Meckling,Building Official Transportation Systems Division Jay Covington,Mayor's Executive Assistant Utilities System Division Councilperson Kathy Keolker-Wheeler South County Journal Pursuant to Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 15 of the City's Code, request for reconsideration must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 p.m..December 26. 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the decision of the Examiner is ambiguous or based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence which could not be reasonably available at the prior hearing may make a written request for a review by the Examiner within fourteen(14)days from the date of the Examiner's decision. This request shall set forth the specific ambiguities or errors discovered by such appellant, and the Examiner may, after review of the record,take further action as he deems proper. An appeal to the City Council is governed by Title IV, Chapter 8, Section 16,which requires that such appeal be filed with the City Clerk,accompanying a filing fee of$75.00 and meeting other specified requirements. Copies of this ordinance are available for inspection or purchase in the Finance Department,first floor of City Hall. GTE GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall File No.: LUA97-103,CU-H,V-H December 11, 1997 Page 7 If the Examiner's Recommendation or Decision contains the requirement for Restrictive Covenants,the executed Covenants will be required prior to approval by City Council or final processing of the file. You may contact this office for information on formatting covenants. The Appearance of Fairness Doctrine provides that no ex parte(private one-on-one)communications may occur concerning pending land use decisions. This means that parties to a land use decision may not communicate in private with any decision-maker concerning the proposal. Decision-makers in the land use process include both the Hearing Examiner and members of the City.Council. All communications concerning the proposal must be made in public. This public communication permits all interested parties to know the contents of the communication and would allow them to openly rebut the evidence. Any violation of this doctrine would result in the invalidation of the request by the Court. The Doctrine applies not only to the initial public hearing but to all Requests for Reconsideration as well as Appeals to the City Council. • • • +• P SITE PLAN ,ri\ps3a/�F33� /�Tt�aCOMO.a tm1 aw '. 400 • ' SCALE: 1•.. 20' u - ••a • • • ~ �• _ NE 12TH STREET • 10••af/IS/r1 • .rI13 aOaa••D 70•p•p C•YY(MT •0'n..S..S]:C. JL-•L..7YS..-. iK(• anC[•xYcl.( Lw..•c•••sxsu•s Y✓1 / - L 'VIZI PR �yA —I row..Y.a t • • •r.nwSlMLya-J. n16• '1 AG. u9t• • r 2 .'o ci IJ1 p!IM r777 ./Sn� k, W I ri1,\x• u WOG\O.40. GR .0/(m 1 (a►1y ........ � •1] -- • lov--,...4 r !') .. r 4 ,•� • A•RMu 33. 0 /�r�nri\ ' TWO VW I .0 CAP .• i • t• •• • .1. :Ill a 'f / / 4Y'Ab / / A sent •4.. ..i•.,I.../ ~•• • ii����{�/ •;/J G / / • 1 ,A 0 73 /row ea m �•.4K0i .� .O wntr rr; �sns 3• •' %/sn] / • ' _j .Y r paf is:— / ruu / +�+(r I� !e ('�1 y5 w ,- p 0 € x$: .pw a., / // is ' .. •r ......• .. . - u , / 3N "AMl�rMO a,a' WC 3Ar . s / ' .. 1 42• ago- p 7—_ a II !YID 4 ' S a =° r O �' la u 7 •�• B t il f 3� 4 1 y •17 • _ f8 4 tI d �i [9•tr1 7a1Y J ti (( ••'3N AY C311100rNr• •Z 9 Ark r '1 .• ,... y .�s ,. d i".w(p i t.f - !� 3xr 3nrv3,.. ] 'r - )N CAUTION! 03Ili qq1 '• (>JpNr ,•;1 'ron_pa .M.aKuulun wa,ic+i o..�Y:. _ a i i 7� IJ•w.wae x SgRVEY POINT 1115 .Dr IL CM.../R. co lx+MT w- 1 n• p i 7 /-1 • 1 JL�.�I w .0/i.rJ0'a•'V•J39r_mrs [atv.wlD CMt urury La.rt S[K[•rr•wY V. WO t3O-Oi19 0 4••Wr3 nq•rp CG•SI•yClfw V. 1 k•D]r•ii0Y 7'.•JJ3r'•a Jti' e 1-800-424-5555 _ LEGEND LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1:••T7 SAL aC.Lwu• •. •K••.31f I(i 7 IK KIT••lt o•.K CAST.w C.Tr( SIC MATT fAS tJE703m CC'C •LC �"r'� POW.L C(w\(01 YYY S „•.°.41 rK•Sl pyTC••.M.0•I!.CSI p+MR•or"". lg. I nC CL C) COMO.SLAW pr YC'K+ �P. POW.L•IC(WWI Po..r•N0 D\.a..J]•q•1•,•MC(f CAP.au.Or an0 MAI% II rot 31 C.•.O 1 C.•••. • 4.4D(• • MO .((0 0• S•..0r0. a••w(•CKST 1•••••R.T.KCOrC(0 :(IMI./...IaRt MJY p ,I i•K•.C I • owl a•C•til.r MI•CO IS••• CI I C SO•MC•S••S InO[•✓0100790O•.KCPOS Cf Y.O[GOuOv1 •SW SOS.Y••S••✓(D 4K40 IC••W War a,DUO wiz.•ICC•C••D CC 81477J1 Y•w.yaY At• UO•I rCL]AVWMIt •Ci•)Ow-n LOWto•r•K •YK(V I n. 51 CCI!. �0-.. VS UK rt• K CW.t.7 A.,STAR O/ ICCI O10L•S KC MKT V '•" D'•O•" CAS v4K xC•0•V M N MO •N.R\i 1•aLL••• .L.146 1S['�w Or xCM• • CC C..OV•T aC� ,P•CKcup lf(IDK•K•OI �v03•y Liw[•r' •Yt•'CY 0RC•ISWUK[CPI•wT COMA/LW ICA.M.0.3.3713-f R•C*5 0 0.1.0.a(Lu•I al 0•S etas.DO[S MT•(r•[x••••aCw••,90NY • / O/.Daa•.S II �� SAKTI UK - CCCD • 00• �aHiwa!o , REVISIONS • D(t•�r- • [L-135(4fitp --go.- moo W.\ •. D.C. RSC•Vl1a. ST• `v1+ CI TO SC4a MU .�1f� i[•L•C �QINC, - • MA.LOGW.OLr, •OI v4K a•••y\•.a��a[\/•In.Ya C✓••O•wtt0•I P /4•TD•wl CO• LCI(a. 1•US MI ■ sang.KR• D, PQlr AS 9.0w 0.• L.PEKE UM.WV, IDOL aZj . . .I1L•7 t\ST••O vor Uv.n0 t • !•O ICO 961/0002 '1.0.. •1 1 e••• • . . . • A., • A';r G 1397 . • • — . . . . . • . . INEMINIIIMINI • . . . . . • . • Oin •. . .. OM COW.ONN.Con TO • • • . yowl.MN ANN.OTEKT•nal MY 7111-ZOI RAM TO CP•eaCTXX 1111.111.1111111111111 co.Tow c•arr•Na ANTONA Mr" ;:•••" t."047=C".."'W ,•,..•••••••711r.O•ATTN..‘1... • b., TON a•NOONTUT iliElpgimill ,WrZgtre NOON.. • 1..113. •• C••••VLIFNM KO te TI,J2==M=M1111011111 OMNI V/Tall WNW ...;::.• MI%I.01 Nft••••4 TOTN. 1111111 kr•ADION ..:i1O• ; IIN•TNI•cuam 0 i . \ / Mat RATION.• 07.1.1"''''''''"=C•'n" l• ..'irS.C111111/741: /:\ IN.a•No,I N.M.... A ;:•.• 4.,..e 1 , ,11_ _ K.Ain••MINI.TINT III :::U.I.XNA / NIMMIININ22 • CD 1111111 1 00EMMO . . SITE MANZI .:.. .:c1W17•,,,?. AT&T 1.40NOPOLE • 1NTE *L-7=4:7"=. ....kV.: ..i.2 riii4k.k, ...m..::..", •••,: .:..y.., ITTMT SITV NULIIICTIs • 'rke40. V 2)1 •'>::•.,&.• WA 020e • ••••••1 ...„...... 5.FT. NAMES HAZEN :...becrw..........n.rJ .v............... rl,TAM.TA. 111M111.1111. 11...oroot AT Tc.• • OT...ova.us *or Mon ruNraCANV• TOCAONTONL.MO ,I I r57.7710.'"" tip @ ANT E 1.44 A PLATFORM I KI•Ir•T.r...a.TTP. re•7-0. , ..... • .N.., \,.,•,. , .... Ma.All.o• 1 E WOTAN ref ,ON. WONG MUM+NOB 'Si )/--j D\ I . % •••o•3O-O••0 •:‘ i,/•••••. ,6 ---1-- -f-- C950,00,600 11 : ' • • 7.),. • 700.47,......no 1 P \ 0® \ k‘ A lia y , \ A /7 , ,. • , `/ I 4 ,...„...y, .... .\ , " 44 ......11: i .s 7: . .., , 4..,...s. . . .,...._. 0 , Li .,....„: . . .:, .... 0 \•, ,,, ,.._...„ , . . , . ,..., . , Allot , @ t... 1 \I , , -, 1 ,e 1..1 0 ‘ ‘ - ' 0 .........N c ' J. 0 0 C\p. .: ).\ 0 \ !a -..... .._ • . -. . . • , f ...7 .. ...7 , .. _. , < - _.., o . . • . . .... . i .. •,"- i . 0 0 , . . .... ,,,,,,..., .... ..,,, . ..,. ,...... .. •. ...... * . , . .... i ,...... .. ., , .... . mcrio.....7ceca.a•--..--) _.,....../. .• * / • • • 5 A : • '......"..-.1/ ' •-•:--../ • I .. -----J ' / • • • • • • • i i , • . ----1..r.10” OPCI.I.,...... , VW.]VO.•••tvf •• • • 4) • : .... •..:... 0 / ARCHIIIICII ••••117O CNIOUT . .,,...,• ,,, 0N. -101) ''' " 44 / • • • • I • ' • II • • 1.0.0 CoNN,Nc 1 49 . , • . .,••• , 09) i . • . . , NOT V.ZUG/ KU MO ILPIC / .....././ '. '" roc'•.trwr n 4.. .el pi •, •.• • • • - ..,:...• , '':'•... i".•imito • •MC* RI // \•••...........-'' (6) W:"....... I I •i (10 ii erano• ::::i:a ,.... -:•:::::. Nt • 44—) a, • n;...11 -,,• •..,ii. r iw. s 4, .c.i 7 \ \ CUP 4-Dill COT@ v@v0V(43*ra*V 44 MM. . =MUM IfilK We IP • / g EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 73 LANDSCAPING PLAN / 8••• • VV.•NIP VO•r••• Normal !.•`•7170.1.7.1%!=r% 11.1.11111.01111 • •'t f;:i.:•: 6 1397 , ••••• • , . 11/17/97 MON 16:53 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE Ijo01 Two Union Square, Suite 5450 601 Union Street ATER WYNNE , o 1i 1 1 O W 11 Seattle, WA 98101-2327 HFwITT 208-6234711 Fax 206-467-8406 DoDsoN & NOV 181997 .� SKERRITT, I IT ATTORNEYS AT 1.11�' y 0 Other Offices in Portland and San Francisco FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL NOTICE: This facsimile contains confidential information that is being transmitted to and is intended only for the use of the recipient named below. Reading,disclosure,discussion,dissemination, distribution,or copying of this information by anyone other than the named recipient or his or her employees or agents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error, please immediately destroy it and notify us by telephone, 206-623-4711, DATE: November 17, 1997 TO: Fred Kaufman City of Renton Hearing Examiner CITY/STATE: Renton; WA FAX NUMBER: 425-235-2513 OFFICE NUMBER: 425-235-2593 FROM: Joel Paisner DOCUMENT: Brief re: GTE PAGES (INCL. COVER) ` *** PLEASE DELIVER TO MR. KAUFMAN ASAP.*** n AKAvFMnN 11/17/97 MON 16:53 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE Lj002 t i 1 2 3 4 5 6 ' 7 8 CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON 9 OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER 10 IN RE APPLICATION OF GTE ) FILE NO. LUA-97-103 WIRELESS FOR CONDITIONAL USE ) 11 PERMIT AND HEIGHT VARIANCE ) SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN l z ) SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE Applicants. ) PERMIT APPLICATION AND 13 ) VARIANCE 14 ) 15 16 L IIV RODUC77ON 17 GTE Wireless of the Pacific Incorporated ("GTE") submits the following brief in 18 support of its application for a conditional use permit. The original hearing for this 19 application was continued in order to allow clarification and possible code amendments 20 relating to the City of Renton's new wireless ordinance. The purpose of this brief is to 21 provide the Hearing Examiner with the background and information regarding the City 22 2 3 Council's recommendation to amend the wireless ordinance. 24 IL CITY COUNCIL ADOPTS COMMITTEE REPORT 25 The Renton Planning Commission held two hearings on proposed changes to the city's 26 wireless ordinance. Renton Municipal Code ("RMC") § 4-38. The Planning and A/r+lrjw Hnx U/3/140Bmq&� Shaw �OJ ffad Wa�r ,3Linr%d5O L, n ABlal-tu7 Page 1 �- BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION ,EF,07111,31, 11/17/97 MON 16:53 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE Ej 003 . e . 1 Development Committee of the Renton City Council held a hearing, and reviewed the 2 Planning Commission's recommendations. The Committee also provided representatives 3 from the wireless industry to participate. 4 5 The Committee considered the issue of whether to allow the siting a Monopole II 6 facility within 300 feet of a residential zone. This was the issue that lead to the hearing 7 examiner continuing the present application for a conditional use permit. GTE's application 8 for a Monopole II facility was in a zone allowingplacement of such facilities - the RM-N 9 zone. The current site has two other similar facilities. The city staff was in favor of the 10 facility. The only issue barring consideration was the city's wireless code prohibited this 11 12 type of wireless facility within 300 feet of a residential zone. In this case, the site was 13 within 300 feet of a residential zone, but the property contains a public high school and not 14 residences. 15 The committee recommended to the Renton City Council that the wireless ordinance 16 be revised to provide for siting of Monopole II facilities in the 300 foot setback from 17 residential property. The committee's report recommends in part: 18 19 The ordinance should be revised to allow for the construction of new Monopole II facilities within 300 feet of a residential zone with a Hearing 20 Examiner conditional use permit, provided the site already has other existing support structures. 21 See November 10, 1997 Planning & Development Committee Report. This report was read 22 23 and adopted by the Renton City Council. on November 10, 1997. 24 25 26 Agsr R'.rW+ Dolma&spa,LLP dor zip sb.r, sue Page 2 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE Snack, Rey" i 'o' ' APPLICATION - , � 11/17/97 MON 16:54 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE I ]004 ! 1 III. GTE'S APPLICATION MEETS THE CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA 2 GTE's original application and brief to the hearing examiner support the issuance of 3 this conditional use application. Rather than set forth those arguments here, this brief 4 incorporates the original brief and application to support the conditional use permit 6 application. In addition, GTE also submits the correspondence with the Renton Planning 7 Commission and the Planning Development Committee of the City Council as a basis for 8 issuance of the permit. 9 lv. CONCLUSION 10 GTE respectfully requests that the Renton Hearing Examiner consider and grant the 11 conditional use permit application and request for variance. With the city council's proposed 12 amendments allowing g Monopole II facilities within the 300 foot setback area, the proposed 14 facility by GTE meets the intent of the code, and will be fully screened, and have less impact 15 on the adjacent areas. The prior brief is submitted and incorporated herein by reference. 16 DATED this 17 day of November, 1997 17 ATER WYNNE HEWITT DODSON & SKERRITT, Y LP 18 19 20 21 f / 1 By • 2 R. Paisner 23 if SBA # 16405 24 Of Attorn •s for Applicant GTE Wireless of the Pacific Incorporated 25 26 A7r iY�mai Mar i Agleam4 Skim*L.L.P. edu Mims arral,SEre 5I50 Srml4 W 9M1D1.2v77 Page 3 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE ♦Ill APPLICATION ,RF, ,o 11/17/97 MON 16:54 FA% 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE C{3j005 - -- = ��u..._ To 94678406 P.01 i Post-it"Fax Note 7671 bare _ • • PLANNING.&'DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE COMMITTEE REPORT • l�lovemberl$�, 1997 ' [77-7 ' • .- WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE 1 EVZSZONS - ' . . ( 'em�d 6/23/97) _ , The P1sruting 1,0# De'v6laprneut•-Corr mittee recommends.adoption of,.the•revised, draft ordinance dated , November 3, 1997 as„rec vended by staff and the P1ammng Comrnission,with one'addilaonal revision. The ordinance should be.revised Id allow for the construction of new Monopole II facilities within 300 feet of a • residential zone with a Hearing#xaminer:conditional use permit,'provided the site already has other existing support structures. The?loaning,end Development Committe further recommends that no dditioual ogee . be made in the ordinance'to allow,for the constructiom of additional support structures within residential areas of the City. The curreut.prohibitions through the prohibited use designations should remain unchanged in the • ordinance,except for this one revision recommended by the Cornmirtee. The original Wireless Comaruaicaticns Ordinance was adopted by City.Council on June 2nd, 1997 in respanse • to an emergency situation. Following completion of the environmental review for this ordinance 'a public hearing was conducted before Council on June 23,•1997. Revisions were requested at Tlmt time'by industry repressentatives,land this revised'draft ordinance incarporate5 staff recommendations in,respor se to these •rued revisions. . . .O ,• ��/ ./,/, • , • ��� ,-yam..% _ . :•• Edo. rds ` - Chair • • . . rs I. " 11/17/97 MON 16:54 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE Z006 ATER WYNNE Two Upon$quart HEWITT 601 i?aiOn Srreet,Suite 5450 �t 5e�u1c,Washington 98101-2327 DODSON & (206)623-4711 Pax(206)467-8406 SKERRITT, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW November 5, 1997 Honorable Mike Katterrnann Renton City Council 200 Mill Avenue S. Third Floor Renton, Washington 98055 RE: Proposed Amtendments to Wireless Ordinance Dear Mr. Kattermann: We are writing on behalf of GTE Wireless ("GTE") regarding proposed amendments to the city's recently adopted wireless ordinance. Renton Municipal Code § 4-38_ These suggested amendments arise out of a recent application by GTE for a wireless facility in the City of Renton. These suggested amendments are minimal in nature and designed to provide flexibility to the city and its Hearing Examiner when reviewing certain wireless communication permit applications_ The need for this amendment became apparent after GTE had applied for a wireless antenna to be sited on property that was properly zoned (RM-N), and already had two other monopoles on site each with two carriers operating on each monopole. Renton's planning staff favored the location because of the tall trees on site and the ability to consolidate facilities. However, the current wireless code prohibited the application, because the site was within 300 feet of a residential zone_ The residentially zoned property within the 300 foot setback is an athletic field adjacent to a high school. The changes suggested in the proposed amendment allow a wireless carrier to apply for a limited variance. The variance will be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner when a wireless facility is to be located in a permitted zone, but falls within the 300 foot setback from residentially zoned property. The Renton Planning Commission raised concerns regarding encroachment of commercial operations on residential properties. To address those concerns, the proposed amendment is further limited by allowing a variance only when the wireless facility is within 300 feet of publicly owned residential property, and the site has existing wireless facilities operating_ These amendments are modest in nature, and allow wireless facilities to be consolidated rather than spread throughout the city. These amendments would further Portland,Oregon (503)226-1191 Fax(503)226-0079 San Francisco,California (415)421-4143 Fax(415)989-1263 11/17/97 MON 16:54 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE C3J007 ATER WYNNE Renton City Council November 5, 1997 Page 2 encourage the co-location of wireless facilities, and continue to protect residential areas from encroachment by these types of facilities. The other site available in this area that would '1 meet the current code offers no screening from trees, and would have a much greater aesthetic impact. We appreciate the Council's consideration of these suggested amendments, and stand ready to further elaborate the basis of them, and the potential impact. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, A DODS .454 SKJERTarr, LLP � l Joel 'sner Enclosure cc: Kate Stephens, GTE Wireless Steve Welton, TM Consulting Group Neil Watts, Senior Planner Larry,Warren, Esq. 1 11/17/97 MON 16:55 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE ZI008 D/94 r .. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NO. 4666 4-38-11: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SUPPORT STRUCTURES: MONOPOLE II A. Definition: MONOPOLE II: A wireless communication support structure which consists of a freestanding support structure, sixty (60) feet or greater in height, • erected to support wireless communication antennas and connecting appurtenances. B_ Prohibited Zones: Monopole II Facilities are prohibited in the RC, R-1, R-5, R-S, , R-10 and R-14 zones. C. Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit: Monopole II Facilities may be allowed with art Hearing Examiner conditional use permit in the RM, CN, CD, COR and CC zones. Monopole II Facilities are prohibited in these zones if located within 300 feet of play RC,gy R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10 and i+YYR-14 zone- p `0,�e':t'A k Y,'4'.1.'•'CAT J4p',D #A '••". ��` i"` •.>;, 'i ,F; iV r F i 4 .„ ,. 4 :.1;. . •,. �,4 '1L`-. ,� • g , •,,.y,. :1•�AP' Im o). oyf� .x� .ri ��.r�s % +xfi,,t� V -�:. .� a ��.. ;'f�.,���,�;.'�,� gip•�. "" •��;?N'�r,�i.�,r� „•• a� ` •g .te. `;ti� 6`6 w ;n •` ,gw%a. 3 •:s , ;, tw„, ,�•''1��,kc�ra ` �,.. , 1 .t'.S:i�Xi'3s:tL ..:.. Maa•iNr?f'biF.s:Y•.'� i�f, D. Administrative Conditional Use Permit: Monopole II Facilities may be allowed with an administrative conditional use permit in the CA, CO, IL, IM, and IH zones. Monopole II Facilities are prohibited in these zones if located within 300 feet of an RC, R-1, R-5, R-8, R-10 and R-14 zone. E. Height: The maximum permitted height for a Monopole ].I Facility shall be 35 feet higher than the regular permitted medium height for the applicable zoning district, or 150 feet, whichever is less. F. Antennas: Macro Facilities are the largest permitted attached wireless communication facilities allowed on a Monopole II facility. Antennas which extend above the Monopole II wireless communications support structure shall not be calculated as part of the height of the wireless communications support structure. For example, the maximum height for a Monopole II facility shall be one hundred fifty (150) feet and the maximum height of antennas which may be installed on the support structure would be fifteen (15) feet, making the maximum permitted height of the support structure and antennas one hundred sixty-five (165) feet (150 feet plus 15 feet), ,RiamIzz 11/17/97 MON 16:55 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER %VYNNE LI009 • G. Equipment Shelters or Cabinets: A shelter or cabinet used to house radio electronics equipment and the associated cabling connecting the equipment shelter or cabinet to the Monopole II Facility support structure shall be concealed, screened, camouflaged or placed underground. When they cannot be located in buildings or underground, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be fenced, screened and landscaped in conformance with City Code Section 4-31-34, Landscaping. Landscaping shall include a minimum fifteen (15) foot sight obscuring landscape buffer around the accessory equipment facility. Accessory equipment facilities located on the roof of any building shall be enclosed so as to be shielded from view. • H. Landscaping: Monopole II Facilities shall be landscaped in conformance with City Code Section 4-31-34, Landscaping. A minimum landscaping area of fifteen (15) feet shall be required surrounding the facility. Landscaping shall include trees, shrubs and ground cover. The required landscaped areas shall include an irrigation system. • w.pwrhUa 11/17/97 MON 16:56 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE Cj010 ATER WYNNE NE Two Union Square Hiri'I�I' 601 Union Street,Suite 5450 + Seattle,Washington 98101-2327 :ODSON & (206)623-4711 Fax(206)467-8406 SICERRITT LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW October 22, 1997 Renton Planning Commission Fourth Floor 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055-2189 RE: Proposed Amendments to Emergency Wireless Ordinances Dear Planning Commission: We are writing on behalf of GTE Wireless ("GTE") to comment on the proposed changes'being considered to Renton's emergency wireless ordinance. Renton Municipal Code § 4-38. GTE currently has a proposal before the Renton City Hearing Examiner to construct a monopole at a site at 1160 Duvall Avenue in Renton, Washington. GTE performed an extensive search in the area of Sunset Boulevard. It sought a location where superior coverage for its digital network would be offered and where the zoning allowed for such a use_ GTE also looked for a location that provided screening for the facility to reduce aesthetic impact. The site at 1160 Duvall Avenue provided a wooded lot with significant screening, as well as preexisting monopoles providing co-location opportunities and consolidation of uses on one lot. This site was also far enough away from residential uses that it would not impact those areas. The one problem with this site is that it is within 300 feet of a residential zone. Although, there are no residences within 300 feet, the current wireless code does not allow the planning staff or hearing examiner to take that into consideration when recommending conditions for the use. See Renton Municipal Code § 4-38-1l(B)(C). The code states as follows: ...Monopole II Facilities are prohibited in these zones if located within 300 feet of a RC, R 1,R-5, R-8, R-10 and R-14 zone. Id. Both planning staff and the hearing examiner have concluded that this provision "prohibiting" a Monopole II facility within 300 feet of the listed zones cannot be varied by RMC § 4-38-14(B) allowing a waiver or reduction of certain code requirements. This is despite the agreement by planning that GTE's proposal is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, and that absent the prohibition on setbacks, the proposal should be approved. See Preliminary Report To The Hearing Examiner. Portland,Oregon (503)226-1101 Fax(503)226-0079 - San Francisco,California (415)421-4143 Fax(415)989-1263 11/17/97 MON 16:56 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE on ATER WYNNE Renton Planning Commission October 22, 1997 Page 2 The goals of the wireless ordinance favor allowing the heating examiner to vary the 300 foot setback from residentially zoned property. The specific goals of the ordinance state as follows: L_ Encourage the location of towers in non-residential areas and minimize the total number of towers throughout the community; 2. Encourage strongly the joint use of new and existing tower sites; 3. Encourage users of towers and antennas to locate them, to the extent possible, in areas where the adverse impact on the community is minimal; 4. Encourage users of towers and antennas to configure them in a way that minimizes the adverse visual impact of the towers and antennas; and 5. Enhance the ability of the providers of telecommunications services to provide such services to the community quickly, effectively, and efficiently. By allowing the 300 foot residential setback to be subject to a variance, the city will continue to encourage placement in non-residential areas, limiting the total number of towers, and simultaneously encouraging joint use of sites. GTE's proposal is a prime example of the greater flexibility needed in the city's ordinance. By granting the hearing examiner variance authority, the city can maintain control over the impacts to residential areas through the variance process, yet balance that with the particular circumstances presented by a site. GTE's proposal is to construct a facility at a properly zoned site, where other carriers currently operate from, and contains superior screening. In addition, the property that is zoned R 8 is school district property and not a residence. Under the present ordinance, none of these factors can be presented to the hearing examiner. GTE is always interested in working with local jurisdictions to find creative solutions to siting wireless facilities. By incorporating a modest change for a variance, Renton can 11/17/97 MON 16:56 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE 10012 ATER WYNNE Renton Planning Commission October 22, 1997 Page 3 continue to maintain control over wireless siting while simultaneously allowing greater flexibility to applicants. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the city's ordinance, Very truly yours, ATER WYNNE HEWI'iT & SKERR1Tr, LLP The!R. ner cc: Kate Stephens, GTE Wireless Larry Warren, Esq. 11/17/97 MON 16:56 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE z o1s 2 3 4 5 6 • 7 8 CITY OF RENTON, WASIIIGTON 9 OFFICE OF HEARING EXAMINER 10 IN RE: APPLICATION OF GTE ) FILE NO. LUA-97-103 11 WIRELESS FOR CONDITIONAL USE ) PERMIT AND HEIGHT VARIANCE, ) 12 ) 13 Applicants. ) ) 15 16 r INTRODUCTION 17 This brief is submitted on behalf of GTE Wireless of the Pacific Incorporated. GTE 18 Wireless ("GTE") has applied for a conditional use permit and variance to site a 120 foot 19 monopole at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE, Renton, Washington. After a preliminary review by 20 city planning staff and an indication that the proposed site and height were acceptable, GTE 21 pursued the permits for the site. After full review by staff, GTE learned that staff was of the 22 23 opinion that Renton's new telecommunication's ordinance, adopted on an emergency basis, 24 prohibited the siting of GTE's proposed monopole. 25 GTE has fully complied with all of staffs requests for this proposal, and the record before the hearing examiner establishes that it is entitled to the conditional use permit and ere evy.r.meted.&skv,;a, r.,u1,i. sue. L� tng us=soo7 Page 1 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDMONAL USE �7n APPLICATION 111/17/97 MON 16:57 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE 14014 variance requested. Planning staffs reading to the new telecommunication's ordinance is in error and not supported by the clear language of Renton Municipal Code ("RMC") § 4-38- 3 14, as well as the prior approvals granted to the other wireless providers. In addition, the 4 5 1996 Telecommunications Act supports the grant of GTE's proposal. See § 47 U.S.C. 6 § 332(c)(7)(B)(i)• 7 IL THE HEARING EXAMINER HAS AUTHORITY TO WAIVE OR REDUCE CODE PROVISIONS TO SUPPORT THE UNDERLYING GOALS' OF THE ORDINANCE. 8 9 The newly adopted Renton Municipal Code ("RMC") relating to the siting of wireless io facilities grants the hearing examiner the authority to waive or reduce certain requirements 11 when the goals of the code will be better served. The code specifically grants this authority under the following language: 13 the governing authority may waive or reduce the burden on the applicant of one or more of these criteria if the governing authority, concludes that the goals of this ordinance are better served thereby. 15 16 1. Height of the proposed tower. 17 2. Proximity of the tower to residential structures and residential district boundaries. 18 19 3. Nature of uses on adjacent and nearby properties.... 20 5. Surrounding tree coverage and foliage... 21 9. Availability of suitable existing towers and other structures, 22 RMC 4-38-14(B). Against the backdrop of the overall goals of the wireless code, this partial 23 list of development standards in RMC Chapter 4-38 altered or modified by the hearing 24 examiner. Requirements such as height and setbacks can vary to fulfill, the ccsde's ultimate 25 5 goals. .u..Wya,+.e..ar Dogoas&a-ark,L.L.P. 001 Maws Scrrif,5 .u®.s so 4 w 98IY4..9j7 Page 2 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE elf APPLICATION 11/17/97 MON 16:57 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE t&015 RMC § 4-38-1 establishes the specific goals of the ordinance. They are as follows: 2 1. Encourage the location of towers in non-residential areas and minimize the total 3 number of towers throughout the community; 4 2. Encourage strongly the joint use of new and existing tower sites; 5 3. Encourage users of towers and antennas to locate them, to the extent possible, in 6 areas where the adverse impact on the community is minimal; 7 4. Encourage users of towers and antennas to configure them in a way that minimizes the adverse visual impact of the towers and antennas; and 8 9 5. Enhance the ability of the providers of telecommunications services to provide such services to the community quickly, effectively, and efficiently. 10 GTE proposes constructing a 120 foot monopole in the RM-N zone. The facility is classified 11 12 as a Monopole II and is an allowed use in the RM-N zone, subject to a conditional use 13 permit. RMC 4-38-11(B)(C). The code then states as follows: ...Monopole II Facilities are prohibited in these zones if located within 300 feet of a RC, R-1,R-5, R-8, R-10 and R-14 zone. 15 16 Id. This section must be read in the context of the entire ordinance, and the hearing 17 examiner's express ability to alter specific criteria. See RMC § 4-38-14. Renton city staff 18 has taken the position that this provision bars siting of any monopole in this area. However, 19 the ordinance itself allows such conditioning of a permit to make it consistent with the 20 overall, goals for siting wireless facilities. These goals are met by GTE's proposal. 21 The city may argue that it should be offered deference on its interpretation; however, 22 23 such interpretations are not absolutely controlling. See Hoberg v. Bellevue, 76 Wn.App. 24 357, 884 P.2d 1339 (1994) citing Hama.Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings Board, 85 Wn.2d 25 441, 536 P.2d 157 (1975). All sections of an ordinance must be harmonized to be read -.6 A4r i�j a.i Awd&Dar.*E Slkmria. 601 BW trf S1rR�S4SO k w . �elal n7 Page 3 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE ) �It APPLICATION 11/17/97 MON 16:57 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE I-2 016 Iy together. Nisqually Delta Association v. DuPont, 103 Wn.2d 720, 696 P.2d 1222 (1985). In L Nisqually the court stated as follows: 3 The act must be construed as a whole and, if possible, the provisions of the act 4 should be harmonized to insure proper construction. citing Tommy P. v. Board of Cy. 5 Comm'rs, 97 Wn.2d 385, 391, 645 P.2d 697 (1982). 6 The conditional use criteria in the RMC specifically apply to wireless installations. By 7 reading the ordinance as staff suggests development conditions cannot be altered or 8 diminished. Such a reading would limit the reach of RUC § 4-38-14(B), and no proposal ' 9 could be conditioned that was somehow outside the development criteria. The Renton City 10 Council clearly had in mind allowing the governing authority flexibility when applying 11 12 development conditions to each proposal. This is particularly so when it adopted specific 13 conditional use criteria, not utilizing the preexisting standards in the RMC. It is not unfettered discretion, but must be guided by the ordinance's goals. 15 The application before the hearing examiner provides ample evidence why it 16 should be approved with appropriate conditions. The proposed location is in an area that 17 provides the only screening available in the general vicinity. On the site there are several 18 19 tall trees that allow the facility to better fit in the area. In addition, there are currently two 20 other monopoles sited at this property, with colorations on each pole. By.allowing GTE to 21 site its facility in this location, with another colocated carrier on the pole, Renton will 22 consolidate the location of wireless facilities, instead of spreading them throughout the 23 community. 24 While the adjacent area is zoned residential, the actual uses within 300`feet are school 25 6 district athletic fields. The hearing examiner is authorized to take into account the Arm wya+u n. fadm.a SLsv.id.1..4r. dal v.•m 9a.',Ez $450 s.�rtS w d,5 loran Page 4 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE ti �,1 APPLICATION 11/17/97 MON 16:57 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE 2017 • "proximity of the tower to residential structures...". RMC 4-38-14(B)(2). There are no L single family residents within 300 feet of the proposed facility. The apartment buildings to 3 the north are not excluded from the 300 foot zone. GTE's proposal meets the city's goals 4 5 for siting of wireless communications facilities. By meeting the city's underlying goals and 6 requirements for this site, GTE has met the intent of the code, and is entitled to the 7 conditional use permit for this site. 8 III. ME 1996 TELECOMMUNICATION ACT SUPPORTS APPROVAL OF GTE'S 9 APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. , 10 Because Renton has already granted two separate conditional use permits with 11 accompanying variances to GTE's competitors in the same location and same zone, a 12 question arises whether the city is discriminating between providers. Federal courts have 13 rejected local denials of wireless antenna permits when the substantive portions of the TCA are contravened. See Western PCS II Corporation v. Extraterritorial Zoning Authority of the ' 15 16 Cityof and County of Santa Fe, 957 F. Supp. 1230 (D. N.M. 1997). 17 1. The 1996 Telecommunications Act Prohibits Unreasonable Discrimination ation Among Carriers 18 19 Congress enacted the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("TCA") to increase and 20 encourage competition in the telecommunications industry. Id. at 1237; Sprint Spectrum L.P. 21 v. Jefferson County, 968 F,Supp. 1457 (N,D. Ala. 1996), The following provisions were 22 enacted to preserve and encourage competition in: 23 The regulation of the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless 24 service facilities by any State or local government or instrumentality thereof— 2 5 (I) shall not unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent 6 service; and Ai. W w!Moist Dam. s&o,ur_ On I.�... r.SOSO s.mA. �v Za�r"r M1014J27 Page 5 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE a°% f23.71, APPLICATION /17/s7 MON 16:58 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER %VYNNE LJ 018 (II) shall not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services. 4 3 § 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7))(B)(i) 4 In the case of Western PCS II Corporation v. 1traterritoria1 Zoning Authority of the 5 City of and County of Santa Fe, 957 F. Supp. 1230 (D. N_M. 1997) Western PCS applied 6 for a `special exception" to attach a PCS antenna to a water tower. The County's zoning 7 commission denied the application after numerous hearings. Western challenged the denial s 9 under both state and federal claims. The court held that denying Western's application was 10 not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Id. at 1238. It also held that the denial i 11 amounted to and had "the effect of denying the provision of this new technology and its 12 advantages to the Hondo Dills area." Id. 13 The site proposed by Western was found to be an important site in that it allowed Western to provide PCS service to a corridor along Interstate 25 near Santa Fe, New 15 16 Mexico. The court remarked as follows: 17 It does not take a telecommunications engineer or a marketing expert to recognize that an inability to provide uninterrupted service along the 1-25 corridor would seriously 18 impede Western's ability to compete with its competitors in the Santa Fe area. 19 Id. at 1237. Denial of this site was held to be unreasonably discriminatory, Because of the 20 inability to locate other suitable sites, the court found that a denial of the site served to limit 21 22 competition, contrary to the intent of the TCA. Id. at 1238. 23 In Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Jefferson erson County, 968 F.Supp_ 1457 (N.D. Ala. (1996), 24 the Federal District Court struck down a moratorium imposed by Jefferson County, 25 Alabama. The county had adopted two previous moratoria, but the third one did not .16 Ater Wouil Rm jp Qb/na1 A Skaarlll,LLP_ f01 Una , S:515o Somata, W an f8101.2.127 Page 6 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE a� J711 APPLICATION I11/17/97 MON 16:58 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE [ ]019 ., demonstrate any proper basis. Sprint Spectrum LP and Nextel challenged the moratorium. In striking it down the court recognized that new carriers in an area were offering new 3 digital service to customers, and the TCA protected and encouraged such competition_ Id. at 4 5 1467. The court directly acknowledged the anticompetitive nature of the moratorium: 6 Providers entering the market'several years ago were not subjected to the same barriers. Indeed, earlier entrants have benefitted most from the moratoria, in that they 7 have been sheltered from the competitive forces of a free market, while late entrants offering superior technology have been burdened in their attempts to fill gaps in their 8 broadcast pattern and thereby, to compete. 9 Id The court struck down the moratorium as contrary to the TCA and that the county's to denial was based upon vague, insupportable evidence in the record. 11 1z 2. Denial of the Application and Variance Is Contrary to The Telecommunication Act and Unreasonably Discriminates Between Carriers GTE is constructing an all new entirely digital wireless network throughout Puget Sound. It provides customers with functionally equivalent services as those of the incumbent 15 16 cellular providers, See Western PCS II, 957 F.Supp. at 1237. GTE's application before the 17 hearing examiner requests that GTE be allowed to site a 120 foot monopole in a permitted 18 zone. The monopole is designed to complete the coverage required to serve this crucial 19 portion of Renton, It will provide needed service in the Renton area for GTE's PCS 20 network. 21 Importantly, the city has authorized two separate monopoles of equal height to other 22 23 wireless providers. Airtouch operates one monopole, and Nextel operates the other 24 monopole. Each existing monopole has agreements for colocation. GTE cannot provide the 25 coverage it needs to provide its service to this area without this monopole. These facts are 76 Aar w}•..a H wi.r m.&Stevie;z r, 1 a S+e,S0 s mrLs w P8101-2327 Page 7 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE tr .�r� APPLICATION 11/17/97lik . MON 16:58 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE C]020 similar to the Western case, particularly given the vital coverage needed to offer complete 2 service. GTE is simply trying to compete with the existing cellular providers in the area as 3 well as the new carriers offering similar services. This is especially the case when city staff 4 5 has found the proposal meets the community plan goals, and is essentially an appropriate use 6 for this site. 7 , The existing monopoles were granted.height variances, and allowed to provide service 8 • to this area of Renton. To now deny GTE's application because the monopole exceeds the ' 9 zone height and is adjacent to property zoned R-8 is inconsistent with the city's earlier grants to of conditional use permits and variances for identical proposals. The TCA declares that it is 11 12 discriminatory to unreasonably prohibit the siting of PCS facilities offering similar services ' 13 as other wireless companies. Where, as here, GTE only seeks to construct a site that is identical, the city staffs recommended denial of GTE's application appears to be outside its 15 lawful authority. , ' 16 GTE only requests that the city treat its proposal similarly as it has already treated its 17 competitors. The proposal takes care in siting the monopole. Its height is consistent with 18 19 the network's requirements, and is confirmed by the other carriers similar height in this 20 location. It will be screened by existing trees on the site. The monopole does not differ in 21 any meaningful way from the existing ones on site. All of these factors are consistent with 22 the goals of the wireless ordinance. 23 IV. CONCLUSION 24 GTE respectfully requests the hearing examiner to approve the condidinal use 25 , ?6 application with attendant variances. Renton staft's view of the new wireless ordinance is Atr Wynne Hera&Akalcou i SYi.+id,L.L.P. al SsZ:s sq Page 8 - BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF CONDITIONAL USE R7r " APPLICATION 11/17/97 MON 16:59 FAX 206 467 8406 ATER WYNNE t1021 not consistent with the plain language of RMC 4-38. Reading it the way staff has clone 2 would render whole sections inoperative. GTE's proposal meets the comprehensive plan 3 requirements, as well as the wireless code requirements. it requests the hearing examiner to 4 5 overturn the staff recommendation and grant the conditional use permit application and 6 variances. 7 DATED this 29 day of September, 1997 9 ATER WYNNE HEWITT DODSON & SKERRrfr, LLP 10 11 12 By • R. Paisner 13 . BA # 16405 Of Attorneys for Applicant GTE Wireless of the Pacific Incorporated 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • Page 9 - i ............. • • • G:>:>::»>:>«:>::><::>::;>:>:»:»:>:»:<:»:>::::<>:::>::::>:::>:::::»:::::>::>::::: : •:::.... •:: ••..•::•:::::.••...... :: ENS .C).UN....:I.L..::...:1-�.:.................:...... :�...:...:. :..:......:...::. .. :.....:..�:.................:.....:..:........ ..:...:...:.:.::AL::BU.{LD.fH�....::::::.�:......::::::::: ........................ :> tion(s. Itsted>are'>tri'> rder`of atication>`numl er only an ' ot > >: sanl rde >: :><: ich :>TE 00. Itcetl..n . :.........:....:. ....:lffie.....:.: .:... . ...............:.................:::....... :......gi:A......necessaril ..the,order.fig.v�th..lc..h.. ;;;:::....::.........................................................................................................:........................................................................:......................................................... PROJECT NAME: Boeing Crew Shelters PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-143,CU-H,ECF • DESCRIPTION: In 1990 the Boeing Company obtained a conditional use permit (CU-081- 90)to locate ten Crew Shelters and a Crew Support Building on Aprons B &C of the Renton Municipal . Airport. This permit was given a termination date that has now expired. The Boeing Company is requesting a new permit in order to continue the use of the buildings in their existing locations. A Temporary Use Permit for the buildings was issued to cover the time period until the City can consider the new application. The Crew Shelters and Crew Support Building are used to provide a location for Boeing's employees to read blue prints and store tools while working on the adjacent aircraft. If the conditional use permit is approved there will be no change in the site as the buildings will remain where they are presently located. Location: Aprons B &C Renton Municipal Airport(West side of main runway). PROJECT NAME: Talbot Ridge Preliminary Plat PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-087,PP,ECF,CU-H,V DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Triad Associates, proposes to subdivide 4.55 acres of a vacant site into 19 lots for single family homes. The site is zoned R-1 and R-8. Project requires environmental review, preliminary plat approval, conditional use permit and variance to construct storm sewer lines in a steep slope/greenbelt area. A new street would be extended from 102nd Avenue SE to serve the plat. Location: 600 feet east of 102nd Avenue SE and SE 184th. PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole/Duvall-Continuation PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DESCRIPTION: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60" x 6") for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 • square feet. The applicant is seeking a variance of 285 feet from the required 300 foot setback from • residential property and a variance from the height limit of 65 feet to allow a 120 foot monopole structure. Ordinance 4666 which became effective on June 2, 1997, prior to the submittal of this application, list this proposed monopole structure as a prohibited use as it is within 300 feet of property zoned R-8. Location: 1160 Duvall Ave. NE. AGNDA.DOC • • • • CURRENT PLANNING DiVISION AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the 4--1 — day of Segew4:)er• , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United• States, a sealed envelope containing • Rapt:AA .-t-c• tkeeor‘Kei butvwkweir • documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing • 42ert4-4%0036.6w‘ ZttVe.. VAtAtotN ZW1 C..ovssu.AKI Gvot ta,c,6e.A. Frtcks . G-ce • • • • • • (Signature of Sender) 'asancito. V— Sc.-inner STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS .. COUNTY-OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 1iJD, 4 K se-E-c&-77.___ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 0 Dated: q/Zg M .4 7 • .•. Notary Public iiiñd for the ate of Washirigtrkff-- *--"• , ' '1'64 • .t• Notary (Print) O ARET My appointment exMpirAe_sRG M MISNON J. c EXPIRtS.d/9/r:.:!, C rt • Project Name: G--rg' PcS PACVNOpae. OVN DLLVeAt Project Number:c,LO-ii,‘ • NOTARY.DOC • • r ; OF' E T Nt.g <> >mmum > of < <> .lye...... SEAT OOUNC L OH IVIBERS leCON0f LOP : R: NTO C.MU.::.LCI.P, LSU.LDiNG. ot �`<:»<>::: >... l-.a o....s:s: (VAt ;:Ir1:>#ltder oua (.0 to t t 4m4..07 ri. ':» itd..rt.. pegopSg0.1 t.*:::p tii@I`.i'Mwhi ... I : i r ono:>: : } . 4f. �e��n :::fit::#he..ti.�a#�ott. f.th...H... f.....h............ ......... ... ...........:::..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::9:.:::::::::::::::::::::::.�:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole/Duvall • PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four(4) PCS antenna (approximately 60"x 6")for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. The applicant is seeking a variance of 285 feet from the required 300 foot setback from residential property and a variance from the height limit of 65 feet to allow a 120 foot monopole structure. Ordinance 4666 which became effective on June 2, 1997, prior to the submittal of this application, list this proposed monopole structure as a prohibited use as it is within 300 feet of property zoned R-8. Location: 1160 Duvall Ave. NE. AGNDA.DOC •F.it City of Renton ' PUBLIC Department Of Planning/Building/Public Works HEARING PRELIMINARY REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER A. SUMMARY AND PURPOSE OF REQUEST: Public Hearing Date: September 30, 1997 Project Name: GTE Personal Communication Systems Monopole on Duvall Applicant/ GTE Address: 2821 Northup Way, #200 Bellevue, WA 98004 Owner/ Robert E. Fricks Address: 1621 Camas Avenue NE. Renton, WA 98056 File Number: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF Project Manager: Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Description: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four(4) PCS antenna (approximately 60"x 6") for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. The applicant is seeking a variance of 285 feet from the required 300 foot setback from residential property and a variance from the height limit of 65 feet to allow a 120 foot monopole structure. Staff note that the proposed monopole is a prohibited use within 300 feet of the R-8 zoned property and that a variance can not be used to allow a prohibited use into an area. Therefore, staff will recommend denial of the application. Project Location: 1160 Duvall Ave. NE ,f,3N :=I CENTRAL : z i, ! i _ HIGHLANDS PLAZA. .;Q ,1 @_ a - I a1 al ! a T'----_ 6 � a A•a wN w J s ,n® 31 !aa•! •r• i I Q ` -e0 V .I 7214 !1 UI nl l•� 444 o •- d=0 ..�lN-n N C • a�I •�•y�Cy��Ily�.... ' I ce-�IR67-!F � LM f1:47 -•' i eo N+m .1 - I •, I ' ' •• `• ' j V' ,„ 0 Ink. � � 1., • I�Y!'LL•:: :, ,• -iti...ir 1 42 4 . s, i I.lA< ne p 7 7 /1<I.i�_..�I �i. I•y1N I• e - - ? JOAnni<l.OrNn, I.fIAe : I a�� • © `ii!e- Cuode J.ENdurd III ".. sxs S' ? ,tom I avAnl N n Q �iQ Y•6 -' ]• Eew.Id N If•<,n 1.]iAC ..T • fy , n •S.E N 116TH""r a e �cuca y "'•' •��IFY ! ®- :::{! '� _� ! Mil "���•7 °elf I 4 E,:ai_ _ a... m ,._ _,�11Nam. .>a city of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H, V H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 30, 1997 Page 2 of 9 B. GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. Owner of Record: Robert E. Fricks 2. Zoning Designation: RM-N 3. Comprehensive Plan Center Neighborhood :Land Use Designation 4. Existing Site Use: Single Family Home, Two 120 foot tall PCS Monopoles 5. Neighborhood Characteristics: North: Multi-family Residential/Commercial East: High School/Single Family Residential South: Single Family Residential West: Single Family Residential 6. Access: NE 12th Street 7. Site Area: 1.81 acres 8. Project Data: area comments Existing Building Area: N/A New Building Area: N/A Total Building Area: N/A C. HISTORICAUBACKGROUND: Action Land Use File No. Ordinance No. Date Annexation 2945 7/7/75 Comprehensive Plan 4498 2/20/95 Zoning 4404 6/7/93 D. PUBLIC SERVICES: 1. Utilities: Water: 12" Main in NE 12th Street Sewer: 8" Main in Duvall Ave. NE Surface Water/Storm Water: Line in NE 12th Street 2. Fire Protection: City of Renton Fire Department 3. Transit: N/A HEXRPT.DOC • City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-903,CU-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 30, 1997 Page 3 of 9 4. Schools: N/A 5. Recreation: N/A 6. Other: N/A E. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE: 1. Section 4-31-8, Multi-Family Neighborhood 2. Ordinance 4666 (Chapter 38-Wireless Communications Facilities) F. APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: 1. Land Use Element- Center Neighborhood 2. Utilities Element- Cellular Telephones G. DEPARTMENT ANALYSIS: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60" x 6") for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. The applicant is seeking a variance of 285 feet from the required 300 foot setback from residential property and a variance from the height limit of 65 feet to allow a 120 foot monopole structure. Two other cellular towers have been permitted on this site prior to the adoption of Ordinance 4666. Both of these towers are 120 feet in height and permit two separate antenna arrays to operate from them. According to the applicant the use of these towers have been maxed out with two separate antenna systems operating from each of the towers. As noted in the project description, the proposed project is a prohibited use within 300 feet of property zoned R-8 (Residential - 8 DU/Acre). The applicant has applied for a variance requesting that this use be allowed within that area on this property because prior to the adoption of Ordinance 4666 other monopoles were permitted on this site. Staff have informed the applicant that the Ordinance was adopted after the other permits were reviewed by the City but the Ordinance was in effect at the time this application was submitted. Staff also informed the applicant that a variance was not the proper vehicle to allow the monopole requested in this application to be constructed on this site. The applicant needs to request the City Council to modify the Ordinance. City staff has no option but to recommend denial of this application. HEXRPT.DOC ,City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 30, 1997 Page 4 of 9 Staff have prepared a staff report that does review the request against the criteria established by the Wireless Communication Ordinance (Ordinance 4666). The variance request to allow this use within 300 of the single family residential zone is not reviewed as the City has no criteria established for a prohibited land use variance. The variance criteria that have been established are for development standards established for permitted uses. 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Pursuant to the City of Renton's Environmental Ordinance and SEPA (RCW 43.21 C, 1971 as amended), on September 2, 1997 the Environmental Review Committee issued a Determination of Non-Significance- Mitigated. 3 COMPLIANCE WITH ERC MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The existing trees on the subject property serve as a buffer for the existing and proposed towers. The land owner shall submit for review by the Development Services Division a covenant prohibiting the removal of any trees on the subject property that materially and negatively effect the screening effect of the trees. The burden of proof will be on the landowner and approval in writing by the City will be required. The covenant shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. The landowner will need to record a covenant prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Representatives from various city departments have reviewed the application materials to identify and address site plan issues from the proposed development. These comments are contained in the official file, and the essence of the comments has been incorporated into the appropriate sections of this report and the Departmental Recommendation at the end of the report. 5. CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Section 4-31-36 lists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner is asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on a Conditional Use application. These include the following: (5A) CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMP. PLAN, ZONING CODE& OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT The proposed communication facility is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies. Policy U-5: Encourage the appropriate siting, construction, operation, and decommissioning of all utility systems in a manner that reasonably minimizes impacts on adjacent land uses. The applicant states that the site provides the City with excellent coverage and minimizes the impact on adjacent land uses. This site is already used as a cellular site. The new antennas will allow the applicant to increase the level of service without the significant impact of locating a large tower structure on a lot in the adjacent area. HEXRPT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H, V H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 30, 1997 Page 5 of 9 Policy U-100: Require that the siting and location of telecommunication facilities be accomplished in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The project location is will situated in that the site is heavily forested. These trees act as a buffer between the facility and the adjacent residential areas. The City has already required a covenant on the property to ensure that the trees remain. Policy U-101: Require that cellular communication structures and towers be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible. The applicant tried to collocate these facilities on the existing poles but found that it was not possible due to the existing or already approved antennas located on the other towers. The proposed monopole will be painted gray which is a color that will blend in with the background to the extent possible. (2) ZONING CODE The project site is zoned RM-N (Multi-Family Residential - Neighborhood). The proposed development will be located a minimum of 15 feet from any property line. This exceeds the minimum setback for this zone. The RM-N zone has a height limit of 30 feet. The applicant has submitted a variance to the height limit. This variance will be discussed in detail later in this report. Ordinance 4666 became effective on June 2, 1997. The applicant submitted this application on August 6, 1997. Staff had original thought of the 300 foot buffer adjacent to the R-8 zoned property as a development standard. A more complete review of the ordinance at the time of the staff report brought the error to staff's attention. At that time staff wrote the applicant and recommended that the project be withdrawn as staff could not recommend approval of a use variance. The applicant has requested that this issue be brought forward to the Hearing Examiner for his determination. This report will continue to review the project as presented by the applicant in case the Hearing Examiner makes a determination in favor of the applicant and overturns the recommendation of staff. (58) COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (1) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. This project does not result in the detrimental over concentration of this use either in the City of Renton or in the immediate area. The Comprehensive Plan calls for the consolidation and collocation of telecommunication facilities. There is already two antenna located on this site. The location of a third antenna on this site meets the requirement for the collocation of facilities. This grouping of the antennas will not be highly visible from the adjacent roadways and will not form a dominating point of reference on the horizon when viewed from a distance. HEXRPT.DOC .City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 30, 1997 Page 6 of 9 (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. GTE chose this site due to the existing monopole structures, complied with the Comprehensive Plan policy of collocating facilities, and the sites ability to provide reception to the adjacent area that currently is not served by GTE. GTE staff did review the surrounding area for more appropriate sites. The commercial area to the north is composed of low building, approximately 20 feet in height, that are not suitable for locating roof mounted antennas because of their low height. Due to required setbacks in this area the monopole would need to be located in front of the commercial buildings where it would be highly visible and more intrusive than the preferred site. (5C) EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The proposed use at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects on adjacent property. The following site requirements shall be required: (1) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The RM-N allows for 45% of the project site to be covered by structures. The proposed structures will only cover approximately 0.3% of the subject property. The other existing antenna and the existing single-family residential structure cover considerably less than 45% of the subject property. Therefore, the proposal at this time are consistent with the development standards for this zone. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The proposed monopole would be located closest to the rear property line of the subject property. The RM-N zone requires a 15 foot minimum rear yard setback. However, this setback may be reduced through the site plan review process by the reviewing official. The project provides a 15 foot setback from the rear property line and no reduction in the setback has been requested by the applicant. The RM-N zone also establishes a 20 foot front yard setback and a maximum of 12 foot side yard setbacks. The proposed facility will be located over 230 feet from the front yard property line and a minimum of 60 feet from a side yard property line, thus far exceeding the zoning requirements for yard areas. (3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The RM-N zone establishes a maximum height for structures of 30 feet. The proposed tower will be 120 feet in height. The applicant has submitted a variance that is described in detail later in this report. (5D) COMPATIBILITY: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord 3599, 1-11-82) The proposed use will be compatible with the existing scale and character of the neighborhood in that it will match the existing facilities on the subject property. The existing trees will form an effective buffer between the facilities and the residential properties to the north and south. H EXRPT.DOC .City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H, V-H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 30, 1997 Page 7 of 9 (5E) PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage may be increased to as much as seventy-five percent(75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord.3903, 4-22-85) Once constructed the facility will only need periodic maintenance. One maintenance vehicle will be required. Parking will occur at the side of the access road adjacent to the proposed facility. No further parking is required. (5F) TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. Once this project is complete, the only traffic generated by this facility will be the periodic maintenance vehicle. This vehicle will access the site approximately once per month. The vehicle will approach the site from N 12th Street via Duvall Ave. NE. This amount of traffic will not have an adverse impact on the adjacent streets. (5G) NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot and the location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The proposed facility will be painted a dull gray so that it will not cause any glare onto the surrounding properties. The facility will not generate any noise. (5H) LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The subject property is heavily wooded and the existing trees form an effective screen around the proposed facility. The ERC has required the property owner to record a covenant on the property that the trees will not be removed except with written permission from the City. This covenant should help to maintain an effective natural landscape around the proposed facility. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the project site. This plan indicates that English Ivy will be planted around the disturbed portion of the site that will not be used once the facility has been constructed. (51) ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. N/A H EXRPT.DOC .City of Renton P/B/PW Department Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H, V H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 30, 1997 Page 8 of 9 (5J) CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. N/A (5K) PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. Adequate public services are available to support the proposed facility. 6. CONSISTENCY WITH VARIANCE CRITERIA The applicant is requesting two variances. The first variance is from the 30 foot height limit established by the RM-N. The applicant seeks to construct a 120 foot monopole with an antenna array at the top. The actual height to the top of the antennas would be approximately 135 feet above ground level. The second variance is from Ordinance 4666 that prohibits the construction of a 120 foot high monopole within a 300 feet of property zoned single family residential (R-8). Staff will review both variances together as the factors under consideration are the same in both cases. However, staff would note that the variance to allow the tower within 300 feet of the R-8 zoned property would be a use variance and not a development standard variance. City Code 4-722, G-3: The Hearing Examiner shall have authority to grant a variance upon making a determination, in writing, that the conditions specified below have been found to exist: 6a. That the applicant suffers undue hardship and the variance is necessary because of special circumstances applicable to subject property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property, and the strict application of the Zoning Code is found to deprive subject property owner of rights and privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the vicinity and under identical zone classification: The applicant notes that the property, while 1.8 aces, is only 287 feet in depth. Therefore, it is not possible to collocate with the other cellular facilities in this area and remain on the same lot. The placement of the existing monopole and the area that will make best use of the existing vegetation is the northeast corner of the property near the R-8 zone. The R-8 zoning within 300 feet of the proposed facility is occupied by the Hazen High School and the associated athletic fields not single family residences as was envisioned by the Ordinance. The nearest single family residential zoned property with a single family home on it is located over 300 feet to the west of the proposed facility. The vegetation of the subject property provides better screening than any other property in the vicinity of the subject property. This is the only property with existing cellular facilities within the area to be served by the proposed facility. Therefore, the impact of development will be less on this property than if a new site was selected. The requested setback (15 feet) is necessary to locate the monopole in an area that will provide maximum screening, minimal disturbance of the existing vegetation, and keeps the facility over 300 feet from the nearest single family residential zoned property with a single family house on it. HEXRPT.DOC •City of Renton P/B/PW Department - Preliminary Report to the Hearing Examiner GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H, V H PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 30, 1997 Page 9 of 9 The topography of this area is fairly level with some topographic change to the west. The subject property is slightly higher than most of the surrounding properties. The requested 120 feet height of the tower will allow the applicant to serve the entire area without the need for a number of smaller monopoles located on residential properties. 6b. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which subject property is situated: The variances will allow GTE to construct their facility in a manner that is most compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and existing facilities while meeting the mandate by the FCC to provide wireless services to communities. The facility and the granting of the variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare or property and improvements in the area. This is the most appropriate location and design within this neighborhood for a wireless communication facility that meets the mandate of the FCC to provide high quality coverage. GTE has carefully selected a site that has many trees to screen the facility, that has an existing telecommunication facility, and is more than 300 feet from the nearest single family residential zoned property with a single family residence on it. The facility has been designed in accordance with the Renton Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan to the extent possible. 6c. That approval shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated: Similar variances have been granted to the other cellular facility to build similar monopole structures on the subject property. The previous monopole structures did not require the variance for the 300 setback because the Ordinance had not been adopted at the time that those applications were submitted. 6d. That the approval as determined by the Hearing Examiner is a minimum variance that will accomplish the desired purpose: The requested location, 15 feet from the property line, and the height, 120 foot tall monopole, is the minimum variance from the standards that will allow the monopole to be located on this site with the minimum disturbance to the vegetation and allow the applicant to provide coverage to the service area. H. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the Conditional Use Permit and Variances for the GTE/PCS Monopole on Duvall, Project File No. LUA-97-103. In the event that the Hearing Examiner overturns staff's recommendation, the permits should be subject to the following condition: (1) Compliance with ERC Mitigation Measures: The applicant is required to comply with the Mitigation Measures which were required by the Environmental Review Committee Threshold Determination prior to the issuance of a building permit. HEXRPT.DOC • • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four(4) PCS antenna (approximately 60°x 6)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. PUBLICATION DATE: September 8, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: September 2, 1997 SIGNATURES: 4 /1-/T7 Gregg Zim a an,A nls to DAT6(1 Departmen PI ' g/Building/Public Works am Chastain,AdminiStrator DATE Community Service Department L e er, Fire Chief DATE Re on Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September ' 22. 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 22. 1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. • DNSMSIG.DOC • CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) - MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. 'The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna • (approximately 60' x 6") for a total of,,.12 antennas.. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately;8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square"feet. . • • •y'J•' .••;a < .. - LOCATION OF PROPOSAL*. '` +1160 Duvall Avenue'NE`; • MITIGATION MEASURES f' 3' .fit .?:�.. ,• _ '•4 • • 1. The existing tries on the subject property serve as a,buffer for the existing and proposed towers. The land owner shall submit for'review by the Development.Services Division a • • covenant prohibiting the removal of any trees on the subject property that materially and - negatively effect the screening effect of,the trees. The burden of proof will be on the landowner and approval in writing by the City will be required.;The,covenant shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. • • • CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF. NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103,CU-H,V H,ECF • APPLICANT: GTE • - PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications • Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60" x 6") for a total of .12••antennas.• .Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be'approximately 8,feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. ' - LOCATION OF PROPOSAL , 1160 Duvall Avenue NE - Advisory Notes to Applicant:• The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination.,,Because'these.Ynotes are provided as information only, they . . • are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager 1: The height of the monopole is listed by the applicant at 120,feet. The total height of the • monopole plus the antenna height is 123 feet. The ground level at the pole site is 442 feet. This places the total height above sea level at 563 feet.`The selected location of the monopole is approx. 1,000 feet east of the east*edge of the Airport's Conical Surface,the outer edge of which has an altitude of 379 feet. The monopole will be 184 feet above this .. ' surface. Because of the height of the monopole, a Notice of Proposed Construction should be submitted to the FAA for review to determine whether an obstruction or hazard to avigation could exist prior to approval. Based on the FAA determination,the project should be lighted,'marked, or not approved. : . . S . The City has neither personnel nor equipment to perform'maintenance. If the.FAA determines the pole should be lighted,then GTE must be required to perform the maintenance of the lighting..If the pole is determined to be an obstruction or hazard to avigation and lighting is requireded, GTE will be required to do the light maintenance::The City Risk Management should be review the requirements for insurance types and limits that GTE will need to provide. City • Code now requires that property owners permit City employees onto their property to perform maintenance. I City.; ,,;anton Department of Planning/Building/P _ Works _ ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Atrrx COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SITE AREA 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx.60'x 6'each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft.tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the . Probable Probable - More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth ✓ Housing it Air 11Aesthetics V Water Light/Glare be Plants ✓ Recreation V Land/Shorellne Use Ve Utilities te Animals ✓ Transportation V Environmental Health ✓ Public Services of Energy/ ✓ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Y Airport Environment • 10,000 Feet NO 14,000 Feet Nts The height of the monopole is listed as 120 feet, however, the pole plus antenna height is 123' . The ground level at the pole site is 442 feet. This places the total height above sea level at 563 feet. The selected location of the monopole is approx. 1,000 feet east of the east edge of the Airport's Conical Surface, the outer edge of which has an altitude of 379 feet. The monopole will be 184 feet ABOVE this surface. Because of the height of the monopole, a Notice of Proposed Construction should be submitted to the FAA for review to determine whether an obstruction or hazard to avigation could exist prior to approval . Based on the FAA determination, the project should be lighted, marked or not permitted. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS The City has neither personnel nor equipment to perform maintenance. If the FAA determines that the pole should be lighted, then GTE must be required to perform the maintenance of the lighting. If the pole is determined to be an obstruction or hazard to avigation, and lighted, and GTE is required to do lighting maintenance, then City Risk Management should review the requirements for insurance types and limits. City Code now requires that property owners permit City employees onto their property to perform maintenance. We have reviewed this appll -%on with particular attention to those areas In which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where ad. .• -I information eeded to properly assess this proposal. 1 ^ / - —I tale gT Signature f Director or Authorized Representative Datele DEVAPP.�� Rev.10i93 • • • • • • • PROJECTIIIIM "ET,w 2_Aesop, SUMMARY vAuLVT AND Vlt!•! [E r<+TI Cu 1p o ffi GIBCOW TPH/C11 Si GTE NW TORTIEm EWE SOO TELDOPI lY}DOOP t!OD!TWEET i,e va:l m n.leE.uu WOOL CONTACT.Jn�■wu EASING0GL.Aq • 1-- ---- _--------_ DTA - - r.-� �_�p (yI- T� . -" I@:roSuM WWI MO/xsm]• •• L L EATING -I lu'.E.:G�S'Ak F 1 � _JI E.Eaz - 1Li o•ER- �'�� ,-.r___ -v.- •C'T- ' Imo• Os1 i •� YFT4 'f_._- ----�-0 '� D<�O¢EV �SL�L.1 � 8� 0 DM PRTpPEE TO COIDTRnT A RADIO DanN0•11.0 - EMSTI O CODDLE SITE NAMG i ! I '' G, _�, RI■JP06E)D eTe AM L a ON GRADE AI°a'O TWEE COOTR°PECT010 � A�yTy1D/�T���... TEL O,.5ER . Aj=D \ ICE see BEE TO TOTALL MINTED M A WO ROICTOLg MONOPOLE Vt- 1 I INC•TTPJ E:Y=TDG TEL.CLD4 T v1 I�G I71 Gw,TTP,Q. l EM.AIPED ELTE PLAN i 'i1 \ �JI _►• I SWEET A-1 - SITE NUMBER: ,� 1 la■�a R• LgL�I-g�A.�•�N••Aa�ME.OB IMMINMMI I j I CLIOTRGTICN TTPE. WA fYDA.A� I WOODED Ew,SiWQnQOPG\E I DacTrATc,•. WA i I I AREA ( 1fccoE. I OI�6LTC'TIENCE ) 1 • •I( ly-30, A, , , WOOGED 10. I�LQL • •� AEA r 2 TRAM•V1 I ; a�, =Ta ' 3.N)D1ENAae O OVOFD l NO WIZ GROMO ID 1'emo= G t ' I 1 1 / ER q• .WOODED 1 !n•� I ;� � • � i-1r CONSULTANT 1 i'` I i05 I TEAM o a P•OEGTrep nse• i `�" MOVING sao , SHEET INDEX n`°:"LT"'WW1'DCORPORA'm ee« )OO mom OEM PTE.ID0 LINE JrTPI-ti-Y DQ9 ' l�.LLEMG WAbIDOTCN MOM ram 112•SOA.•)1•MDO .f(/ I I I A�EC as AUIXtED I TOE T-' BEMZIEBOAL coaacT.PA L MYRA" I TITLE YER vICTmY MP. aiib^^I I 1 AT®DTECT RT 3 I I Wcc�Ec I GA • eIEEE1e a+ilsT AIODTERrGn ARE A-I CRP EODP.DTTRDKN It•RL PAROAL •�'owl mf WAPIAV)T01 WOOS D RD.PETE SO L I AO EMEROOR ELEVATION aro xrnw not.]p 631 ImD 10,1 • _' N NNIEN/A FLAVOR, DAVI OEMu p Q� ' I , A-) A.aXTECOTDAL oeuLP Ii �*E-- °�------_--_--- AE•I mAwARo ELECTRICAL • • .. 1,0`,\ -Ii 51TE PLAN WALE.I.•30-0• LEGAL VICINITY MAP APPROVALS =M.O.= DESCRIPTION 02YfR T..,E.TI • ■ TAR PARCEL NEWS% ))iIPJ I.OT•000 ; ■.■.■.■.-• C 3 • WWI �L_■ � uT poi.. Re Q Re Q!-aNRICR Q SECTION 1).TDLEIIT if MORM1l WING!D EOM. BITEOT@I-PP PLR ■N ■ ■ ■ „ an I(M CaMT,mADInaTETt LTDO TIORIBLT Q TM POOP RAIG]M Q tNl IBITW.rIaPta VALLEY NLWINT.!POEM 4 ■ ■ ■ ■ TIMTPOMO.Q IYO WIm ONEOAIPDmO@ID All FOLLOW.DEldNM AT 1K MIWECTIW Q Ile PEW LIM Q GhT1-K-T BE " . PAID=ECTICTI nDMNe EOM BARON Q MCI NEAPAV.NOCE D TIMIS P E AWNS PAW ROWAN MOM TO AN SEEM NE ITN PT Y �1 O. memo R3'CL.OBOE O were. ALGID PAD WWI-re ®u lo TVEE b1O}Y.TIocE N TJ•ATOp•W MOO FEET OOCE D:rem"G __ TOP TO 111E OEM LNEPATD a Beane. p D•a ALCM PAID UM We.DOM FEET TO TM POT DIEM.EAR `• := Q ECNNDO APO O.ODR 111E EAT S0 WET Q TIE POPO tTT OYRTp•Q TM EATTIOWT GGARTER Q PAO=ECTIOR O. LTDO 0001NLT Q DE TdTONa WN E vN1ET HWILAT.NC OCTINT WE IL•TN SO FEET Q DIE EMT SO FEET Q De DIEM-LYN O PGIMSET OLARTER OFPe DERWOT CIARPOD Q PAD T OOP.M=W O■I ALM& t!ION IT 2, /\ IIONI TOTQYiOT Pn0.1 _ • 311711 Rwr Nom 111111111111.11 • '3 fb, 6 1397 . fit UELr J-fr.r1:— • • • rwND BRASS use • AREA MAP SITE PLAN TEL RiXp�CASE DOPr.Oe0' [ STORM COKRCTE rou.r BRASS uv. . J A/15/97 :9]es' 329 J9' A/1]/9]POST]-up SCALE: 1... 400' SCALE: 1"— 20' No P /Yw.aE wee(rm i w•RD see19NE NE 12TH STREET / DR 1O Se..55' -Q .0' 11 Mu.SATE r/.5 9] = 1 Ee8-18L3'. /x0/ :8]a% 1 r T � _ ZR Er 30'ROAD azi:ENi .ahi=:rh9CN — �1-a.Rp E9 . ..On.PER ASSESSORS RAP) NT _ L LaAnc.PER Ai PSS.27 (/ r: 'E4 - m'w.srawRpJ —rwxo Olt NAIL / BRASS PAGER "gam roaTJ` t ii1 fs"i a•n ON NORM WE P NO/ DOUBLE — n$ TEL.RISER BLDO AL. SNINRISER 'EL ........ RJDf'' I^ L— 0 . vJc „,.4,0\ 3 5DM I I d CRAM M p I I /, •a / \ 9 ,10 IrNa POW)BAR 1 I AND CAP Alf 092 MAO B. IC. 11 bi $B o' / 11..9s /• • / / / / / 8 S # / 1 v /FC O B. 2 CO Su. PT ' Nee-J.'.5• 1 ! �r`ns/9] A^ ..-- pus /J >.0.' ! Mxx / 8 rAND c.a / it — / / BRUSH • LpE.T]P) �// • 9 ,10 9 95585 70- 10 z800:u-E - :e.5 5, 15 50010'S8-C 1 15 1. ;1 ].:e' sane SOT • • • V. SITE INFORMATION CAUTION! 0 T: TM LOT KAMM 10 305-2 0 01-OD E..unun(s E.iSr N NE+R[+ ' • SOT ALONE= T 11N 1]ee1 MOVE E SURVEY POINT 1115 AND unun prCRYADON SNUNN 1..1 wNgi RE5110R.1w NOT e<COYPL[TE. CCNrACr r..E CNi- !lE CONTACT L ImF1Cr i1CCp UM ZX-D110 .083.TJO'089•Y 9:990., ELEV...1 O CALL U58177 LOCATE SERKE A ueA.. $M AREA i nice L. N•DS]+T30'09.5•N.:5:9'�e 1Y • Or.e,.CURS PRIG TO CCASTRUCT,C" EN,..A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1-800-424-5555 gt y TREE LEGEND LEGEND LTE acxcw.R. (NORn.S]5 r(ET Of'•C NEST HALF Cr THE E•5T•AL,or 1.c BOUNOARI WAS DE70YED fliC It O OECOVOUS,scc -"�—� PONT,1840(BVIE[D) Pe,N AP0N•L, NC...5T 0AR1Lp cr INC NOpn.KS!w7vr1p R.SECTION 10. O Cwxir CONTVOI waKr co'XCtCN ��- POUE9 USC OKPNCADI [I[V .u0 o..v.a!]Hop TN,Pu.a!usT,.Y.r.005 CQMTT Ia.T.SJ N.RAG 5 E.,•u. ER TTPC�'`n1UNe 02*01(R INN)YG...L�PLE ilT wYCv0.incn:NPPOLE EXCEPT TNT+CST AS pm 108 1JeTN AKNU[SOUTHEAST A5 S.GA.(R MST SNOT PLAT.RECOVOED ■ O5•ACC pona 9'3t O VO.T PgE/LU.YNANC NSDOT BENCH YARe STAuarO COKKU TO 0R0 AO dr COO UNDER((CCBONO ANO.ST AJe]]S) UNOCP AP Ie.001]900..PCCOPOS OF AOROx• OP.]090-T.LOCATED.T iNC eW0 COUNTY,vASNMOTON —a— ws uNE Oe•O"e G5 VALK iNRRXCriM.O<SP 90 A. �NATE iN MC COUNir Or AON S]AR Or NA40..Oi0.,AS MR[,RSi ].NROLL YAP OF TNE'NEST NAL,Or XCnCN CKRLPECN rRCC CN•p.CARY SA.OS.BCLLCWC,w• (RK.N nnE wwR•ncE cwPANY COMuIM[Ni GW nnE h0.3.1]]]-S. 10 TN.SJ N..ADM S C.♦Y—0E� PAGE LWC(OKPNC.D) ELEV..]Sfl.S.1460 .e CC•OCDCL m MIRAGE LINE YANNOK D.5 PLAN ROCS NOT REPRESENT.N.G.wRKr N.aN 1912 Dr.Doua+srw �„—. XAERUNE REVISIONS `TOP[L Ir Y[.wRCD NC•NEKOOt SENn CLEAN OUT D� SEI•• p.pM O CA101 BASIN Iv11/-1E I1 [CGE. 1PEE 1.A"TORN DRAW • DATE- OCSCR1PT10A Br: A R } i NOTE: 14(OVW LINES APE NOT TO SCALE. IAEF -)� ATER UM �.�'O COMPANY, rS.ABOLS REFERENCE TR Por LOCATION CALL ^ WATER vALvE Ty VICINITY MAP pV.al OUYETERS AVE APPROXIMATED AT Q Mt HYDRANT J S.TO.••BOK fAOulO LML. TREES K55 ■ MATER N TER NOT TO SCALE THAN e"NOT LOCATED EXCEPT AS SNORE. 000 LPR rEN[[ Op.NN DAV,.PATE;t/71/97 — =12 unrR.0 SOOT ELEVATE" ...cc,9616R097• '1,,,1%p'g..,. -. • :.r WOO MAI T'•4 on MOTOR CJ0111r. 17..---1 1 n V6e Na r RANFAC •O MR feLV.VA rmi I nRl !I1 I I AMMO CAODET oa••ren !ILI n�rwr�mtloea���e�rt e�eror — kV 1 I MR m MINCE o orzcorED rimer 11:41190 � IiONK UT M EOM.CAOPer I. 1 I cartiucrcw TO FROM!. ION TOPUNICAPEPO I: I I NRWLL n1 a OUOM MOT 1 I m:ua.W1ro1RW1•Ira •OOOeIe WO Oa MADE r•Lr rErrrR :•*.auras NiaeD R nu:0n 1rut Yar•OCrm.W®I�C�C ' 11,11:11F""°""1:1— e1NOe ea armOORAN NAIVE:sem WOSITE NAME: __ au •�,_ �' acrerooRWN WWr RMar nvaAT t T w MMONOPO�E �3 qq••�� "1;:: e••LN 1•nw OD.aa!iI ':°''6�• e'4.*e >�,p';� �y F. •gam aF'.i•; .0 3$.'�a*'*.t:�•e� s*31,`.,�,..a33a�' .•5.., 'zyb,�y..r.` . r.r:o.m awW®.T'' �� °�." �'d,''a` , e. .... rWr urawm awWvn tC � ,8d'ew°.3' *£ �a.��,...'3..,vY;I $.,,,i: �• M ewR Wr r•cc rmca �HAZEN NAME: AT rBvelO[ r.rDt� ria M Mt COaNLl1 TOP Wa6 W�MI e..1pt.r WRLO.OM11Y11DLr 011at r1N OVAL•MN 1R IO AO OlIIOM ( NP•MTO1OLT.COOTACTOR TO WRIT ALL=MHO l®W@!11• /JOVO Q,O10•10/Nilq Wen L%IORWOO1cR1L NOrMLoi EQUIPMENT DETAIL NIP ©FOUNDATION SECTION r� a E I I a�wWvVn•A111 flu i. 1 i/ ,i,l•-••, ..? p --L.L..1_-- :'.--- - --_ ...?......6.-_, i \\//V I 04W LDK I I 1 / La«r@QW:C �� C s I I / Mr�ar�.,o 1 / iI ,:4:4,,, j IAAI � !y e,aeno t,� , , k . ,A01°)Ele-"' i I ` I // la e�o� I WIe lu1ve ` eel I r 1. 11. / �� o i :. I �el.e � . :.j. i i / rrr.Vu.uwT i i s i b -� i . . . . i i i I` ACNi1XN . . . • • L --I-------------I-_4-------' e ., ..R..W.Or a c 7;1. a•-v ram• wWMWaM aaur' ... ealr.Ivo r- / Lri. A / —• DIMENSION EIS / A 1 • • V _EQUIPMENT PLAN PARTIAL SITE PLAN moro1a VW.r� V{••ram• rl F _ 41J,A . . . . • . • . . . . • . • . • . 11111121MNIN . • . . ' . • En • • yob wen.=ovum=IV NM ICOTNUP OlIN 1 icuxvis.v4 MIMM NerrN41.BOMA=ammo. OM 731-211 MCA TO COMINMCM. OM at EON OMEN. MEIIMMIIIM 0 TOP CP*WWI MN,PLAVOMPITO CM OEM= 1....... TIACAL AMNIA ATOM . ._ MT Cr MTN AMA - "....-----rrOrMANAr • • i., TO.CP MANGLE ill I III I '4-7‘=477".'......e ,TO.CP PNIONME oilmmill MONK>V ANNAN .4• \ , r.r_ tL CP PLATFONICLA MO A.A.... ....6, .,./ AROMA _ / MEM ' eASIAM-nom r.,rrANUT.1 ••..C.X. 1\ - / AN ANNAN minor, iiiir PLANCAP•...NAAS . NOON c-TM • MI Mill il 1111111111111111 . rn INECINIAL *:.e.i. '..::1 °..".,/ PAN MONA 4:;Wi....4 / COMMA PAM. At*,•,,..4.7• .• \ ...... SITE NAME: ACM. .••:•:::)':4 :4*.4:.:vs $::::::::5:::*.•4.*::::$4:::::,. \ ..e..... , .••:::•:•:•:•:•:•A,,A 1.7:::.:*,..::::::::::,„ ..,,, 0.1[PAEC1001. INN AMMO MAMA.PAM. MONA ''.''.*:':',:;:::-.1, .e.:40.1::•:.:•:•:,.., . •."),:4.4'..t.:40:•!..Y.'7,4,•:.:4•:..".O:O.ON. r....,........... .' '''. I ...' AMMO ONO MONOPOLE LUTE SI 2011TA E NUMBER: W 0 H S.AZENME.R. NA 11=111M ( _/ RAMAN AT Tar 1,,,— CP MANOR.MO 90.CAM MNEACNEN. I KM NOON.NO 0' . a MINNA NEES RAMC Fool 30,42.TO SO-O.M NON.TTP. ji i i i*----- @ ANTENNA PLATFORM I -. i 61 lj 12 1..) ,, • E E • ' ). \ /0 );11 :(1.., :- --.-- --1 \..-.1 \ 110..O.........•op \ , v .,....,‘.._.........._,..._.7":"'Y ''''' \ / i 4 "------,A , ,. • 1 /- \ , - 1 . . • - IP- _._._,.., • 0 . . , , e•,...,.., kii,./eilliiir_ .1 •• ,(4) \ I .. , .. 1-- --f • - il i'\\\ I i ',. \( 0 1‘;' ..•' .. <. \.:.„.......„............, \ . I.;L' t."' : EIMMIIIIM\\ V..,' I ,f.-. ...> \ \ 14:4 ( ' f ..e / \ ,, z, 7 ...--- /. \7:.<' ''\ CA A ' . . .. 0 .. . . . ... ; .. . . . •, ,.. •. . 41. 00 00 / • \ , . ..._.,„./ . _,x\ 0 * / MMINNEN= •. - .. .,..., --'/ •\ * * / a • • a ,1.4a-oaffaa.aa __ __.--7 / \ ----"--'-1 , ,..-........ „. • ..„......--- I -.---- - ..... . • • a • \--,--- ( EMMA.P.O.OPCLE '''', • • 0 .. . .,•••,• * -/ M11 • 111 / N errs.E0.0NENT .‘,I 440 1140 // A101141* • M • al I I /. .. '. \' ' MOAN!0..1.2*.C. • EMNSO CmAm LIN NM!•-.NAN NOM. \I 0,) Li (0 / MEMO MAI • •MD / MN= . .-.—.../ 0 .: -.1,.......•:,:.......,....:•.: :•. , . . . . ... . . . 0 / I• 1 \ ...,-... \--.----- • •••.: '.. .-. . , .- MOT..........r.......BAII! MOM.• N 1 II dig< •'• ' : * (0 / .:::. :::::.::: / OPAVE al r . v . cm-covwc-ocovvvvo . ., ... A-2 @ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (2). LANDSCAPING PLAN ii ',:477,..f'37-"ilIPP-4 •.• ,.... MVO . Mr•NV Pow..JAM . .111.1.111 • ,,,.. :::: 197• • ..., .1 , __ • • • • • • • • • • DBmelr�. MIIIIMII 'L COCTYLTOO TO moor NO.ECT TLWAOEM Q AM 00000,01CT MIDI TIC • norm.LAMA.PTO'N ro NRTIDM i ALL nook GROOM MAO&CO OCTO.OD 4O MC.MAITOMME TO SE • ■ IOr-0Rm OAI.Y4®Ua OD MOOD. O4MOOD. TP4 .0.• 3 wow.or e.1®BM ■ . . 1 NOLL ALL EO/EpO ATO ILTODALE PI AIOCODANCE CM TTPDAL PATIO DTATOAO MAn �• TOUTED O1 A6 MALL MMAlCTUTDEf lmrTIOACCTO ULEl9 KCICALLLT VOIC TT9 • OTIEdY OR NDt LOCAL OODEE Ow LAIC ATTOi TM.1"1 4 RAM ME NOT TO R E ITLm.ROB FUR AM NTDOED TO DB A i Tom MACE TO anEDe WI vwi SW 110 OIAOMATTATIC con.rC OMR OCT IE1er ORD ORPLOSE O OA aALr, oleos TTANbm 0 OOT Y �)7>r».AL m pT FETA L MOCIn OTTv mITOAcr ow TO cowTOEIA n• LltL�LOlY TOP.Aa. EaTALT.LTIa1 or r•01EGT row >I.Sii:iiiiii:.- :. i:Si:4 %' IMMEMEll L ALL COGl1E MALL CB room TRT1 TM O @BC AAD MOLL MAN!A Tm COI%BROMT I-�. TrLDII.Ir CL•IEEL r.l1rT I1Trun ccT•r•I BMT ETIBUTM Or OM AT 9 P4 ]E DATA BLOOD OM AT O.OI• r1ATvin NM or AOBmAn SMALL rorVC.MwmcMr r Oral,vi•.OAR r ALL o COn.rroE• APPwOI•m 1 CCCOQi.1,1A LSA...MOInD OTEODMALrIOw,M N �.�.:::i•?:• •::-. •. - l i.TtA> wi0 rNW GRAB ACOORD4Cl TO ALL ETMpARTE I@LOIYODm POACIOB MR ..•..•:.::• •::::::•:-:::•.:..:•',� �� rwu COCL<.DAfTW O COOCIE Yl•DTAM0101 _ pw Tp�Ip� _ ....••�T�� 1 A�TC rucorior DOLL OEN ORr TT1 Y•'a ICEDYwGOD _._.. --'.--. ' Nf[OwMIb A �TTOO O.�iro.®!WOOL ri00i Ow COrrr.T[D , , , • g� d rILHJ I _• .TwclwL TtL M ATOO1m BY PROJECT nouce.f �CY• CMII LNC,I000 ■ rOI4TWTb.6An MOTIO•TYr •• • AND 00000 POET - D.ALLr®00.SO WAD UDO.I0.30•1101 PULL ed COT'CRD _ -;x�•:•".Y• IT DM MOO. Mlfl10E4 -__�� =1L11=111=11=11=I IILI I_I=111"i1=iF-'11=111��n=il lu-il .LrCrpT SITE NAME: A BOOT P OADAnOL ALL DAM.YIDeTAO01.to PI ROOT=TO A - -1=rt=11=11=11�11-II.11-11 ll�Kn-n=n=ii_..- �ffiL oval M A•MC.MODE ._.." ovlorcl.PAD LamuL Noire A�Ty&y�T�r ��A A r�J•1!l L TMT MO CfA.Qccr.r.w OD.Prt EOm r R PABIC aOA OR OPE S r RWnW TO TOOl OMAR.6bL OirrE O�G L Y ISEA W OO OI T SMALL Q ADD Ai*ICAT OwAOU fI MAIL ` • 1 Lea rOET.L-w OD.PIPE EOm M lain-Pa) 1 eAlem OITC.Dad[•.N.va DAD ODIZD EGaIYETm r.!TO TL1CH MOOD 9TE NUMBER: 1N ALENmTts11(AllO E4•MCCIGIIMl D0 50 TO D•IPPC Z)O{ MMMDA.♦PT.BIRO ARCED CM OD.TOOTED E•La/TON WA 0206 KO APO KRIM 0 CABLED 1 Yn MM..MY OM AWED AO AONJINE 4TCP Al.BMA=MAIL ME OD.r'ra,=ED AD ADTN+IW .OAT.LAB.1-»OD.ROOM MOD UM rWOOCRA OR CBTTEw CATO. 3.R. NAME: HAZEN• ( • 0 GENERAL NOTES P.r� ® CABLE RUM SECTION r•Nr D STANARD FENCE t GATE DETAIL �� w••r� • At• • Sis • A g a • l • . . . . • ■�■�■ ARCHI!B4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . MB Ill A-3 _ AT000v1a• • : ;"d�'g qVi • rr MATS •. 6 B97 • • • • • • ' . REOlIur ott O[ITT COPECRLN -•cm/MO A TUNA MVO — -»•OaeTOIT• [aGGAo e MO PRAMbEG71EC.AL A�H tlT'• A710ltl1"pga MACt9 Y REa 0 MOOR DAM d COPPER O METER SAGE OK EO ��OVD■ A TOR LDMENT DITALLATIP/ DMI II a1 I IPA LYRICAL A W�Adt Dbf01lR AUTO. TOR. TLTCAL OJ Jli:TO•DWI OL ON COMER • �AI I[AC IQ4]R MI MDIIIV■•R CO. coast PIT • AXIAL RECEPTACLE• M DAME • �. n.�wr•�MO AS�� 11 TC ldmP>9Ir EIrYN IRA I-PONIIPI OG�F�'I}mm IMMIMMIII [%I•T.p0.1ND D�DIIiTa MN 1.181.14DIAMETEM II I I REnRErdT•WTY DAbm AREA SPAR! rNC.Yl �, MADAUL TRANPIOD eGTa OP D[.ATIOW oa• PRO.ZT MMUYR O M lODM•pR MD rIELC IRILITT ®Kra cP•L CPITNIATOI III II I PTIcm IN■TRAr CALDEr "`AO°�-�,- ---� }-Acm/AD.Nwolw • r1lT WT27W •O■II CT 0. DRCOI ECT PLROI II 1 rm.. � I Q Rwae ARTE•TCIN/A.e • II I I II I DEI.coo a.ETw • SLIME AIe¢aiOR 0 6IotW RICO © YAPO MOLE O I IN N IAe GOO LK w COD PAD &COB D I ' T/ II — mA PANEL. r+rPtInl T.1m►e MT role at eYp�•Ip2 •�n.orevm �asO_c •DA~°E mlLIAV�'n'ro r�P�l LSD I '�_r D"Dl�.�a N>oomE PAD t- r mtO._ C RADC META a• M RRORM APO r0, OONAN APO...TALL OV.... - COCIP.■AND MO LOa1VOLTADE COOWi.ALL FP1AL CONElT•IT �L L MAVEN■POI NOI•LTICN ON.TA ROM YO MLDrI NOR ORE arECPD CODITICT•D TO M laIATTC(T ME TO S w Roos■Denowow DDatr »•MNrVT CLEARANCE TEO1D®eenmA AGTALLED ELECTRICAL AT i T TO PEIIT DOD.DYEDq COMM 0.'DIP'rMr NO ANY ODa1RCTKN • L aOIL•IC[Coders w ODIC AT,eM.OY.EAGLE P IWPW SITE NAME. I.ALL PROTICITVE VS MALL WAVE AR 1pp••TTPq R.W BOLL TO oR WZATGD TAW MDU6RM■ARE 60rIUlNi PA.T.ACtt•L WAY w ALL lOIM'dTMALL L LOCATE Ddlm PeN AROAiCMµ MANS D✓ O WARD TO AVAl-AELZ MORT MIT . MONOPOLE C!rOFEl7mdDED W EITHER T'I.AMPICMQ•ICCP'1'COED COMM COT.T YM TC,p•PCl■LIMIT IEC..4M\ALL aIYiACE AIEY CT LODE a1YLL DE WNCODEO M ACCORDANCE IOW M pprr_. DIADRMe OR CNTRACTORIL ArrIOVED OOP ORADMI.WITTE. TO DR DMALLO v.D G APPROVAL,ON ALL EOARCR NO COMM BRIM DUW61T O AR IEa.m. 1 OE all-LINE G DURM.T1A SW FOR ADDITIONAL NIDOUTIal e.�TED wDCL !E MALL DE RATED R1Y L=DOOR MOOED ENCLOSURES YYLL DE 317E NUMBER: WA 0206 GENERAL ELECIVOCAL NOTES ® ELECTRICAL SUPPORT BOARD Q ONE LINE DIAGRAM S.R. NAME: LWm�WAPIeLDQvwGOTATR.PTDcrDRr vr.r�• �T �' r•r wo o PYALL es Core:nAIUTNN NPILAIED COPPER REVIEW[AOW D COOS/•■ A. CONTRACTORLL PO ODETMON'NULL PAT ALL IZ7H PE w . E■NO■ULL DE { OM ) DDST. LID■ Olp aI®PRn■ ON Pal■TO oTR.W ALL IEa cowAn P■PEGTDCN MOD I 11 .AMULT =TAN TEEM!au APPROVAL • L Vr. D. ALL.I LEGe_C-AL AMC NAAIL.WOPPOI•I TOM Ran■tetoS CP • M PIATICAUL•r M.C.e CODE NEC.fPA1 AS DAL Y Ear-ta ITN DOTTED AREA•A PIVAOCAOm t APPLICABLE LLCM.COO!► TEVEIOOGO•PANEL LAE VNGE emu..PACED. ECRTB(T DRAM D.alA9 AREA IE PYR A. ALL•�•.---•rtso!MALL BE ILL ArrRw19 OR LIMO. •OIQ�N.D�rA�lipriaaw�M'.'+C°� DO EOuITIOR CADRE!rA IDGE NCI I,I2 I 1 L R saw. M pDLDPD NULL RIGID N FELT ALL WRNS PImOE —I `III- !4 Pau : rj M aw.Dla ANAL a GALTMDOPO RYA ORIEL CGIDn,■MD RAM• WIR N1tOEs ALL LADCR NO MATERNAL•DEPDEDED DT DRAD•GE },1 N I III I—I EARN METER DARE . D1C.0 APO[C E w WK.NCLIOLD INCIDENTAL DCIRC TO MOOD!Cal•LETE. p ]: —I 111- WUNw TAPE [Dr C OT' I r_—Ti• : T—1 I I o'ERATNo MD APPROVED ELECTRICAL WIRIER :aSj( 11= I .MC —II ill: cORUD I I •• $j8 j{IETFRALIP �'f�0{N7PlS Hotta%LATC°MAT v TO OM al'ECrC KTDErO.1 • I I i .Yc. I--1 [Lue Ewuo o. ~ I I. I Num I r-1 I I D kueLL 1f Q3 `-=r' 'III: 1 1 I 1 �� I/ M DRAINS I RM°=Anal awzi.BE APPROVED DT M rwoms'r P a e 11 '= ELECTRICAL CDD■Lm• ' I .w rY/a NOWT WIDEN E TO SITE O.D MIT COCIT Es NTMJ.ND M C =I III ::DIE Y NIDV/ flDD T IIIRITT a GOIPOAG•nTErT ae TO SITE DR ROIL ccsolrlar. ♦ _ I III I I �[�,`��R L WOW,ire CONTRACTOR SMALL PROEM TEST w M GINIlpAA] ^^ I I 'III �' ET■}IA/SI • ———i. I II I I °OIL°TEE DT A OE mum of R.POP PRDVOE D'DEPBO ID MR =I I I,- TELl1'PW!CPQIRA •l1016 CIR bJ IEDLm TO M PIEa.Ecr TTAILA[f1D VCR REVIEW IEALLn TOM I N a..M STEER PW.n,m TO GAIR•A Gal/WALL PER pIC[m e OP■rM MOJD ILE EKCE MPTMIMM w A PP4 DYa'D0 =WRAC°,ORLI_B TO PRCVDE ADDMCNAL • MIIIIMINEI �——�T ORGY.6DNENaTrn•M MEWED. I I =i- I I CR I•cal al rV/ 'm'�` iFyCo x1E[11� L J—� A) ALL OR ME WE ewu De TN COATED APO OMEN NOLAT®OM ; . _ BMA. EIRRMCE IDILE°OTIEILDDE NOTED.manse swum CPgC m TO°lam I r T E • 0/•ODO a AiIO ROOD m POYAIm CLAD RAND..it [A.alD RCM MALL Q —I 'I I ...pep Bp. - -PIaPAOCACFD MAPPER uIDDETE > .••CAPER�ETm RODS.T••.O•W.A.PIpVIpE Met I�_ — RID•AA Tan YElI.1FT _I N c I corn.CD eaD T IANACER •/ CdICTION.ALL ADO.OaDAOE MORON NCLADI P CaICCTPm 1 II SMALL DE DaDLE-LIO CPT+0eaw TTME.ALL elLCW-awAD0 ATO -III=I I-I I I—II I_I I I-1 !-11 I= DOSSED ERIWPE GAQPOAG mPECTNP®ro r0••IMB?EOAaSOR MO FADED 6RDAG ELDE Re NULL TO CAODEID MTV ENDOW M CP W W W°wYA L:TED. P['ICT UDlIT Oa.MEWS Top DDo CLEAR WlD I V L f VTASCCaa WEEL DEEP-TAPP AGw lO OGRE°DRY DOIDLE-L CPIESSO• C � LOCATIONS NEW T OOA LC LOCAT MO MATERIAL TOMS L D¢•A ATE TO RCO1D®DEI•TN TO WARD PCOSIDLE GALVANIC COMMON. WDDDIO WO MO.00 • ROEL LE]Ar LOCAL MITI RO REOGIEp�M• ONE LINE DIAGRAM "EIIERCsOOD° o. DOOE,PLWOREAIL O 3;:. ;AAVT�"^�r PANEL OPTION RREL TRENCH DETAIL 1D 7.DD ACED Re IDE DIOT LPo D.NEL LIn '- 0I r•r■ P•r TALC-RCA LIP MOLE 4R •r was DPACPO TATC-PM PP POLE•I NV R.I.P. •MRTAALBPOLOMEUMBMA,LOIODA[IQLIO - ANTENNA COAT 61.OIW(TTP/IL MACES - TAAC-11CY WV POLE•D V YACDAD COM%DIOIEOC DATE AT/NTCEU PEGTOR LGOATIO}D T I m H LIE•Y r.CAlb 1 1 1 1 1 J RT T EACTI°RCM •! ALL EW'RED W¢11OP8 COLEGTKV6 TO e!COATED SITU I� t AMEND RADC ION Aa DOICATED/ . . ■ ■ ARIOMA COAX �/ . . ANTI-CORROSIVE MYM NICJI AS.NOG R•,ND.LDR•PN,•BEII.2A•. WOIAD61Th 1 . . . . . ADEPT RIEDE=mTN PROJECT MANAGER. J T/ ALL DOLTARa AID NITSOECD ON WiVONS CO.ECTIOD • l9 TS YTg •.W.LO OE DU m SMALL ea aTEEL COAT GI■AlD DATE AT TaDER SASE AR + D 91 WILE W RACELY O T•ALL OPODEO GROWN.CPAPPALLOIOTO D APPALL PIE ROUTED ■ ■ ■ ■ N PVC RAClD4T.PVC RACEWAY MAT e!RENmIE Da IEIOID. 10 0 a OO N P.C R.RWAT TO MARWICK VAUT ■ ■ ■ ■ • aaaNO cvalnalm WALL NOT MACE cPlrAcr MM MR METALLIC ro■•maR r-��[TTPr.AI/ GIDUD FENCE CORNER room nrPi Au[T W.BOUT GPG+A DusArre a.eauP: _/ CAODELD f IEEG[IOY TOME DAY' IR1RT NPTOR ODAIO ORCOO �D MB UP T�DAG MP A RKEAMAO aJ I 0 6[i.+O TON TRA[BMTMER EOIPTBNT FW 1 =///y — /o /� •DAB — GROlO EODAPO°ONDPADJ .Lf PLOP — 9ADodTOPWO.TOIRDMN AE-1 PROVIDE 1plPETOBIr ELECTRICAL WOVO PER LOCAL ITTLITT RlaIREPIE 1RTE `OROIO IECO Ar CO•!IE MO TY■PETAL le FOR PPOMATEN PIT. AT MNPDET M PRERVALE O P Am ROOD AD RE NEWT■ECPIG OROPOPO RCOAI®•COO RM.PRGECI rLANABEIP ®GROUNDING DIAGRAM f~�; c"r e 1 f F r•; r•r M• Dr MIMIIMINIMII • • • ( 1397 --- -------------------- -------- - - — -- ------------------ - ---- -------------- ----- ---- ------------- i P r4 _ DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON Consulting Group, Inc. SEP 0 8 1997 TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED September 4, 1997 Mark Pywell Development Services Division City of Renton 200 Mill Avenue S Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Pywell: I have resigned from JM Consulting Group to pursue the development of my own business. My last day with JMCG will be Wednesday, September 10. After that date please contact Steve Welton at 425-635-5834 if you have any questions. Mr. Welton will follow up with LUA-97-103, the proposal for a new GTE monopole near Duvall Avenue. I hope we will be able to work with each other in the future. If you ever need to reach me please call me at 206-524-3891. Sincerely, JM Consulting Group Paul Inghram • Seattle Regional Office:500 108th Avenue NE,Suite 1150 • Bellevue,WA 98004 • Telephone: (206)637-8650 • Fax:(206)637-8651 • imnimimigimmiummollinmelmimmtuRREN7ppLANNING.DIVISIONAFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAJUNG ENEmonnumgammmumomugn: • On the 4141 day of Stpieryiber ., 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing • ERC ' Ddenrinkh ens documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology • Don Hurter WSDOT • KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities • • • • Duwamish Indian Tribe • • Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power • • • (Signature of Sender) StrIgkaliVinntri STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that 6431(b1 /dVAlen ' '''' ''''' this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the!•'‘gse ".'abicl Osirposes mentioned in the instrument. - 0? ..` Dated: q/V/e/ , • Notary Pu ' in and f6 t e State of Washtirdipliu.,01% Notary( r ) GARET J. PULUlAki. • ' My appointment exi(XIMMISSION EXPIRES 6(9/98 Project Name: • • kW &re Fcs monopole.. on Mum I I Project Number 411-103, C34-Il , 144 EciF • NOTARY.DOC _ CIT' JF RENTON: -. ..Il. ..Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 5, 1997_ • Mr. Paul Inghram'. JM Consulting Group -- • 500-.108th avenue NE,#1150 = . . ` ..Bellevue,wA 98004 _ SUBJECT: . GTE PCS Monopole/Duvall . Project No. LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF Dear Mr. Inghram: - • We are hereby forwarding the Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes for the subject project. These were inadvertently • • ommitted from the original paper work.' • : ' ` ::: WAC 197-11-660 states that the responsibility for mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. Since an environmental impact statement has not been prepared for this project;any mitigation measures'established by the ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant: ; ", - 4 Staff urgesyou''to contact the various:City:representa tives, as appropriate, (e.g:;--the Public Works Division) as soon as • possible,:.to'obtain `more;;:information Concerning ;specific;mitigation .measures for this "project,:if you ,have specific • questions. This information will assist you in planning for;implementation of your project and will enable you to"exercise your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. • , Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September. 22. 1997.-:Any aggrieved person feeling tlat,the'environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous-procedure, errors of,.law or:fact, error in judgment, or'the'discovery of new evidence that could not _ ,be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments After review of the comments, if . the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not„sufficient evidence to amend its:original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period: Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within.'the original 15-day timeframe:"Written'comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 22, 1997.. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application`fee with: . Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,'200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to .the Examiner, are governed by:City Of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be:obtained from the Renton City:Clerk's Office, (425)-235- 2501, A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton; Washington, on September 30, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider:the Conditional Use Permit and the Variance. The applicant or represent_ative(s)_of the•applicant is;required to be present at the,public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing If the Environmental Determination • 'is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. ', - DNSMI TR noc 200 Mill Avenue South:- IZeritpn,Washington'98055 ' • .. : *AN Thie n�ner rnnf-.lnc Fllo% September Page-2 If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above,please call me at(425)277-5586. . • • ' For the Environmental Review Committee, • • Mark R. Pyw Senior PI cc: GTE/Applicant 'Mr. Robert Fricks/Property Owner ' Enclosure f • • r dnsmR CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES • • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT:`_ GTE PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications ' Service '(PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. 'The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60" x 6") for-a total of12'antennas. Site development will also include two 'equipment cabinets: Each cabinet will be approximately'8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 squarefeet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL 1160 Duvall Avenue NEe':. `. - MITIGATION MEASURES: 1.., : The existing trees on the subject property serve as arbuffer for the existing:and proposed - ',towers. The land owner shall submit for review by the Development Services Division a covenant prohibiting the removal of any trees on the subject property that materially and negatively effect the screening effect ofthe trees. The burden of proof will be on the landowner .• • and approval in writing by the City:will be_required.',The covenant shall be recorded prior to the ' _ issuance of building permits: .: — F — a: CITY.OF RENTON :: DETERMINATION OF.NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103 CU-H,V H,ECF APPLICANT: • GTE 1 - PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications . ` Service-(PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays._ Each; antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna - . (approximately 60" x 6") for a total,of 12"antennas..• Site development will also include two • equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 8001square feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL ,;., 1160DuvalliAvenue NE i::.'. Advisory Notes to Applicant - The following notes are supplemental information'provided in,conjunction with the. environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only,they are not subject,to the appeal process'for.environmental determinations. -j Airport Manager - 1: The height of the monopole is listed by the,applicant at 120.feet. The total height of the monopolepl'us the antenna height is 123:feet. The ground level at the pole site is 442 feet.,. II This places the total height above sea level at 563 feet. The selected location of the monopole is approx. 1,000 feet east of the east edge of the Airport's Conical Surface,the • - outer`edge of which has an altitude of 379 feet. The monopole will be 184 feet above this • ' surface. Because of the height of the monopole, a Notice of Proposed Construction should be submitted to the FAA for review to determine whether an obstruction or hazard to avigation could exist prior to approval. Based on the FAA determination,the project should • be lighted, marked, or not approved. . • The City has neither personnel nor equipment to perform'maintenance. If the.FAA determines the pole should be lighted,then GTE must be required to perform the maintenance of the : II • lighting.' If the pole is determined to be an obstruction or hazard to avigation and lighting is • requireded, GTE will be required to do the light maintenance. The City Risk Management should be review the requirements for insurance types and limits that GTE will need to provide. City Code now requires that property owners permit City employees onto their property to perform maintenance. f; t. CITY OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 05, 1997 Washington State . Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 Olympia,WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations On September 4, 1997,we forwarded the paper work for the following project. The Mitigation Measures and Advisory Notes ' were inadvertently ommitted and are hereby being transmitted. DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED GTE PCS MONOPOLE ON DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service(PCS)facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three(3)antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four(4)PCS antenna(approximately 60"x 6")for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. Location: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 22, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments,if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe.Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 22.1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office.,(425)-235-2501. If you have questions,please call me at(425)277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, • Mark R. Pywe CP Senior Plan cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division,Metro Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries - David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources . Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang,Seattle Public Utilities - . Duwamish Tribal Office • Rod Malcom, Fisheries,Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power • 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 f CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60" x 6") for a total of.12 antennas.. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The existing trees on the subject property serve as a buffer for the existing and proposed towers. The land owner shall submit for review by the Development Services Division a covenant prohibiting the removal of any trees on the subject property that materially and negatively effect the screening effect of the trees. The burden of proof will be on the landowner and approval in writing by the City will be required. The covenant shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. f CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60" x 6") for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE Advisory Notes to Applicant The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager 1. The height of the monopole is listed by the applicant at 120 feet. The total height of the monopole plus the antenna height is 123 feet. The ground level at the pole site is 442 feet. This places the total height above sea level at 563 feet. The selected location of the monopole is approx. 1,000 feet east of the east edge of the Airport's Conical Surface, the outer edge of which has an altitude of 379 feet. The monopole will be 184 feet above this surface. Because of the height of the monopole, a Notice of Proposed Construction should be submitted to the FAA for review to determine whether an obstruction or hazard to avigation could exist prior to approval. Based on the FAA determination, the project should be lighted, marked, or not approved. The City has neither personnel nor equipment to perform maintenance. If the FAA determines the pole should be lighted,then GTE must be required to perform the maintenance of the lighting. If the pole is determined to be an obstruction or hazard to avigation and lighting is requireded, GTE will be required to do the light maintenance. The City Risk Management should be review the requirements for insurance types,and limits that GTE will need to provide. City Code now requires that property owners permit City employees onto their property to perform maintenance. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four(4) PCS antenna (approximately 60"x 6)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. PUBLICATION DATE: September 8, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: September 2, 1997 SIGNATURES: 21 *1°11 q/i/q Gregg lige an,A imsfr t�oi� DATE /'z / 7 Departm -PI ' g/Building/Public Works am Chastain,Admini ator D TE Community Service Department .z/../zci' / 7- g „---r----7 L e er, Fire Chief DATE Re on Fire Department ' DNSMSIG.DOC / Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 22. 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 22, 1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. DNSMSIG.DOC _ CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • :: MITIGATION MEASURES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF •• APPLICANT:: GTE PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall , ' • • = DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60" x 6") for a total of 12_antennas. Site development will also include two - equipment cabinets. Each cabinet-will be approximately 8 feet long,by'2.5.feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. LOCATION OF.PROPOSAL `' • -1160 Duvall Avenue`NE <a' i' - - xi,:. t ES: .. " • MITIGATION ME ASURES: 1..- The'exiistingtrees on the subject property serve as a„buffer for the existing:and proposed ..`' towers. The land owner shall submit for review by the Development Services Division a - :;. • covenant prohibiting the removal of any trees on the subject property that materially and negatively effect the screening effect of,the trees. The burden of proof will be on the landowner - • - and approval in writing by t• he City will be;required.''The,covenant_shall be recorded prior to the, issuance of building permits • , i CITY.OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) • - ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S) LUA-97-103,CU-H,V H,ECF APPLICANT GTE :_ PROJECT NAME: _ GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: GTE proposes to construct aPersonal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. •The.proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60" x 6") for a total of".12 antennas. ;Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet,will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet.• LOCATION OF PROPOSAL '•1160.Duvall Avenue NE _ Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the. environmental determination: Because these,notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager ` = 1. .The height of the monopole is listed by the applicant at 120,feet. The total height of the monopole plus the antenna height is 123.feet. The ground level at the pole site is 442 feet. .. This places the total height above sea level at 563 feet. The selected location of the monopole is approx. 1,000 feet east of the east-edge of the Airport's Conical Surface,the outer`edge of which has an altitude of 379 feet. The monopole will be 184 feet above this ' surface. Because of the height of the monopole, a Notice of Proposed Construction should be submitted to the FAA for review to determine whether an obstruction or hazard to avigation could exist prior to approval. Based on the FAA determination,the project should be lighted, marked, or not approved. - , The City has neither personnel nor equipment to perform maintenance. If the.FAA determines the pole should be lighted,then GTE must be required to perform the maintenance of the lighting. If the pole is determined to be an obstruction or hazard to avigation and lighting is requireded, GTE will be required to do the light maintenance. The City Risk Management should be review the requirements for insurance types and limits that GTE will need to provide. City Code now requires that property owners permit City employees onto their property to perform maintenance. • gin. :CIT' „IF RENTON SALLPlanning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor ' Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator. September 4, 1997 Mr. Paul Inghram JM Consulting Group .• - 500- 108th avenue NE,#1150 Bellevue,wA 98004 SUBJECT: GTE PCS Monopole/Duvall • • Project No. LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF • Dear Mr. Inghram:. This letter is written on behalf of the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project. The Committee, on September 02, 1997, issued a threshold Determination'of Non-Significance-Mitigated with conditions. See the enclosed Mitigation Measures document. . ' WAC .197-11-660 states that the responsibility for mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to.the identified adverse impacts of the imposed action. : Since an environmental impact statement :has not been prepared for.this project; any mitigation;.measures established by.the.ERC not directly attributable to an identified adverse impact is deemed to be voluntarily accepted by the applicant. - _ ='Staff urges you to contact the various City'representatives, as appropriate, (e.g.,the Public Works Division) as soon as possible, to obtain more information concerning specific 'mitigation measures for_this project, if you have specific questions. This information will assist you in.planning for implemttioprojectwillexercise ena • n ofyour and -enable you to • your appeal rights more fully, if you choose to do so. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM.September 22. 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is :based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental.Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: .Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. • Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must'be filed in writing 'on or.before 5:00 PM,September 22. 1997. Appeals must be filed'in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue.South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235 2501. • A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton,Washington, ,on September 30, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit and the Varianceo,.The applicant or representative(s) of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing If the Environmental Determination is appealed,the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. °r.' : DNSMLTR.DOC : 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, Washington 98055. September 4, 1997 Page-2 • If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(425) 2.77-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, , . Mark R. Pyw CP Senior Pla r - - cc: GTE/Applicant - Mr. Robert Fricks/Property Owner Enclosure I F ,,,/ ..;.;, , I , - III' ` •K _ - i • dnsmftr. CITX - _3F RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department - , Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator - - September 04, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology ' Environmental Review Section PO Box 47703 -Olympia,WA 98504-7703 .' . ' ,. , Subject: ° .Environmental Determinations • • Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed • by the Environmental Review Committee(ERC)on September 02,1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED GTE PCS MONOPOLE ON DUVALL LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service(PCS)facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 12.0 foot monopole with three(3)antenna arrays: Each antenna will include four(4) PCS antenna(approximately60".x 6")for a total of 12 antennas Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet Location: '1160.Duvall Avenue NE. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on.or before 5:00 PM September 22, 1997. Any•aggrieved person feeling that the,environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on ' erroneous procedure,errors of law or fact,error in judgment,or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably -available at the time'of the determination may submit'written comments.After review of the comments,if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day ,timeframe.Written comments must be filed with:``Jana Huerter,Land Use Review Supervisor,City of Renton'Development =. • Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055: ::'-' ' Appeals of either the environmental determination[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 22,1997. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required • $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055.Appeals to the • Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have questions,please call me at(425)277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, • Mark R:P ,AICP i:. Senior Pl er • cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries 1 ; •David F:Dietzman;Department of Natural Resources : Don Hurter,'Department of Transportation :; ;. ' - 'Shirley Lukhang,'Seattle-Public Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office eries•Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance)Rod Malcom, Fish - • Rita Perstac Puget Pew ee - '200 Mill Avenue South_=.Renton,-Washington•98055 ' - This oaoer contains 50%recycled material 20%nost consumer - .- . .-. • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristine Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee a dailynewspaper seven times a week. Said newspaper is a le al (ERC)has issued a Determination of wi n- published (7) 9 Significance - Mitigated for the following newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months project under the authority of the Renton prior to the date of publication, referred to,printed and published in the English language Municipal Code. GTE PCS MONOPOLE continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County LUA-97-103,CU,V,ECF Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Environmental review for Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility at I State of Washington for King County. 1160 Duvall Ave.NE. The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County The 15 day comment and appeal period Journal (and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a • end at 5:00 PM on September 22, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land • GTE PCS Monopole-LUA-97-103, CU, V, ECF Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures as published on: 9/8/97 imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$56.15 Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- Legal Number 3585 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal Building. /�l� • , A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular / Le al Clerk, South ounty Journal , meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, ' Washington, on September 30, 1997 at _ � 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Subscribed and sworn before me on this I�a'�pd-ay of )LP,f`t 19 Q/ Permit and variance. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will ' be heard as part of this public hearing. (r),_3114J2-- - Q Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing.`��11111111/ff���� Q � Published in the South County Journal ���cN.•M FF,y4, Notary Public of the State of Washington September 8, 1997.3585 • `�i‘o �Ss1oN-.A�� �tii King Countyresiding in , nton . Washington —0— = .0 jO..LAC p;' : . %9> •.76. .2.. G•C ii,,Op WASH, ‘``� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. GTE PCS MONOPOLE LUA-97-103,CU,V,ECF Environmental review for Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility at 1160 Duvall Ave. NE. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods for this project will end at 5:00 PM on September 22, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. A Public Hearing will be held by the Renton Hearing Examiner at his regular meeting in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington, on September 30, 1997 at 9:00 AM to consider the Conditional Use Permit and Variance. If the Environmental Determination is appealed, the appeal will be heard as part of this public hearing. Interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing. Publication Date: SEPTEMBER 8, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnsmpub.dot , . . 10;!..,,,i___Ii...r . . • ., \i it i . ......d .. . ,6 . , ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION • PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF GTE PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE(PCS)FACILITY LOCATED AT 1160 DUVALL AVENUE NE.THE PROPOSED FACILITY CALLS FOR A 120 FOOT MONOPOLE WITH THREE(3) ANTENNA ARRAYS. EACH ANTENNA WILL INCLUDE FOUR(4)PCS ANTENNA(APPROXIMATELY 60'X 6') FOR A TOTAL OF 12 ANTENNAS. SITE DEVELOPMENT WILL ALSO INCLUDE TWO EQUIPMENT CABINETS. EACH CABINET WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 8 FEET LONG BY 2.5 FEET WIDE BY 6 FEET TALL. THE TOTAL PROJECT AREA WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 800 SQUARE FEET.LOCATION:1160 DUVALL AVENUE NE. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. IXXX] YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM,SEPTEMBER 22, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR • MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, • WASHINGTON,ON SEPTEMBER 30,1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. To �CENTNAL S • ) HIGHLANDS PLAZA Y • • fir_ a ua -. 2 kl� wy ,o B,`.C..o a • •. t_ • ,n.. ._,_,deice.-.,= .. 1 • �.o W 6 .. ; a 1''Aj' .... r 42 ,... ?8 1......,.... 1k �.�a� A. " I FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I ' ',Please Inciudethe'project NUMBER when calling for,proper fileaderitif'ication: CERTIFICATION ' I. )AIA1ir( , hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on cbrfE'i?a3 vY-z., 5--1/9qr 7 Signed: : • ��"°'% 71 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that MATT" `l•►/i..A l signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and uO14- .ry•act7for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. •• ��'_�' , 14 igf : ,.7)1.1 @ i),,, , Dated: q/5-h/ , ' hi—. ..: 40 ia Notary P.•lic in a a or the= t'ale.ej' a=shi.nglon ') ', 4 e 1 a Notary •rin1).________MARGAIttLEULLAR My appointment expir NOTARY,OOC .1 ,,i___„. .. „.,... 'N.' Ii." -' . f*. . ,..„„..„,j„.,,, ,ct,,,i.;„.),.!.. .,,. .. ,. .. ......00 . .. r ims ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND PUBLIC HEARING POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF GTE PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE (PCS) FACILITY LOCATED AT - 1160 DUVALL AVENUE NE. THE PROPOSED FACILITY CALLS FOR A 120 FOOT MONOPOLE WITH THREE(3) ANTENNA ARRAYS. EACH ANTENNA WILL INCLUDE FOUR (4) PCS ANTENNA(APPROXIMATELY 60"X 6") FOR A TOTAL OF 12 ANTENNAS. SITE DEVELOPMENT WILL ALSO INCLUDE TWO EQUIPMENT CABINETS. EACH CABINET WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 8 FEET LONG BY 2.5 FEET WIDE BY 6 FEET TALL. THE TOTAL ' PROJECT AREA WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 800 SQUARE FEET. LOCATION:1160 DUVALL AVENUE NE. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. XXX YOU MAY COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1997 OR APPEAL THIS DETERMINATION BY 5:00 PM, SEPTEMBER 22, 1997. THE COMMENT AND APPEAL PERIODS WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY. A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE RENTON HEARING EXAMINER AT HIS REGULAR -. MEETING IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF CITY HALL, RENTON, WASHINGTON, ON SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AT 9:00 AM TO CONSIDER THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE. IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IS APPEALED, THE APPEAL WILL BE HEARD AS PART OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING. ]o 'vSEt� '.CENTRAL A z HIGHLANDS PLAZA'_ z .; E I�.�I • I0. 1 ' a 7•-' __ 6 = �i aiJ1. n. a w 111 111 I:r P. • At e ' !���.j��T ad 1„��i tea' --f®- *f.nrsa-frT J L1LJ L 1 ... fO n+ 0 ,-=r w Ar. I. ,f.1 -E'tti -El+^n1, n J 1 •7 �1 1 1.. . - r 11-.�C ' 1"© l n C4WeJ WCNeK nfac . '6 46 e "O,Q "•L j faw.rd H.c 'T S.E. 116TH o e o eo — • t 1.r.SE.ur.II6TN. ST. 441 a'_ .,3�, .w.,ec" . • • - _,. 0.,,,,..,...a., ,,,f...,,,,,, ..,....:...... , ,,,,„ i T- 1 +IrH TH i ,•,...7,„ ,J ..VI .f-IR gare++ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ;,,:,i,::: °::::;;:Please:ii ciude,the' ro ectNUMBER*Ii0.'callin :lpf;#0 0.flitejele.0tlfication':=»> ` " `';">::::: • STAFF City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works REPORT • ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE A. BACKGROUND ERC MEETING DATE September 2, 1997 Project Name GTE PCS Monopole on Duvall Applicant GTE File Number LUA-97-103,CU-H,V- Project Manager_ Mark Pywell,AICP H,ECF Project Description GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communications Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna will include four (4) PCS antenna (approximately 60"x 6") for a total of 12 antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets. Each cabinet will be approximately 8 feet long by 2.5 feet wide by 6 feet tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. Project Location 1160 Duvall Avenue NE Exist. Bldg. Area gsf N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area gsf N/A Site Area 800 SF Total Building Area gsf N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommend that the Environmental Review Committee issue a Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated. VICINITY MAP b errs Y q VIIET NE I. . I ►u:mr i unu 1 � ea4oa. I Project Location Map . • ERCRPT.DOC City of RentonPB/PWDepartment Et :mental Review Committee Staff Report . . GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103, CU-H,V-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF September 2,1997 Page 2 of 4 B. BACKGROUND There are two existing personal communication tower sites on the subject property. One site has been developed with a 120 foot tall monopole structure with two antenna arrays. The engineers (USWEST) for this tower have stated that the tower could not support an additional set of antennas. The second site currently has obtained building permits for a 120 foot tall monopole structure. GTE staff have been in contact with the owner/operator (Nextel) of the second tower to determine if they could co-locate on this tower. They were informed that the owner will be installing one set of antennas at the top of the monopole and the second location on the tower for antennas had already been leased out to another cellular operator. Recently the City has adopted an ordinance regarding the location of cellular antennas within the City of Renton. Although there are two similar towers on this site the applicant needs to have a conditional use permit and a variance approved by the Hearing Examiner. The variance and conditional use permit are necessary due to recent ordinance changes adopted by the City Council. This application is scheduled to be presented to the Hearing Examiner on September 30, 1997. C. RECOMMENDATION Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period with Concurrent 14 da A .eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment Period with Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Period Concurrent 14 day Appeal Period. followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. D. MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The existing trees on the subject property serve as a buffer for the existing and proposed towers. The land owner shall submit for review by the Development Services Division a covenant prohibiting the removal of any trees on the subject property that materially and negatively effect the screening effect of the trees. The burden of proof will be on the landowner and approval in writing by the City will be required. The covenant shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. ERCRPT.DOC Ci1Yof Renton P/B/PWDepartment E ;mental Review Committee Staff Report . . GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-103, CU-H,V-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF September 2,1997 Page 3 of 4 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager _ 1. The height of the monopole is listed by the applicant at 120 feet. The total height of the monopole plus the antenna height is 123 feet. The ground level at the pole site is 442 feet. This places the total height above sea level at 563 feet. The selected location of the monopole is approx. 1,000 feet east of the east edge of the Airport's Conical Surface, the outer edge of which has an altitude of 379 feet. The monopole will be 184 feet above this surface. Because of the height of the monopole, a Notice of Proposed Construction should be submitted to the FAA for review to determine whether an obstruction or hazard to avigation could exist prior to approval. Based on the FAA determination,the project should be lighted,marked, or not approved. 2. The City has neither personnel nor equipment to perform maintenance. If the FAA determines the pole should be lighted, then GTE must be required to perform the maintenance of the lighting. If the pole is determined to be an obstruction or hazard to avigation and lighting is requireded, GTE will be required to do the light maintenance. The City Risk Management should be review the requirements for insurance types and limits that GTE will need•to provide. City Code now requires that property owners permit City employees onto their property to perform maintenance. E. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS In compliance with RCW 43.21 C. 240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. Has the applicant adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development? 1. Earth Impacts: The entire project site is 800 square feet in area. The only soil disturbance at this site will be the construction of a base pad for the proposed tower and the equipment cabinets. No earth will be disturbed outside of this area for the proposed development. No wetlands or sensitive areas have been identified on the subject property. The project site is currently a compacted gravel surface that was used as a staging area for a previous project. No natural area outside the project site will be disturbed as part of the project or as a staging area. Existing paved surfaces will be used as the staging area. In accordance with the Municipal Code the applicant will need to provide temporary erosion control measures. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 2. Air Impacts: Adverse air quality impacts will be limited to fugitive dust and construction equipment exhaust during the construction phase of the project. The adverse air quality impacts will be limited to exhaust from the occasional maintenance vehicle during the operational phase of the project. Fugitive dust will be mitigated by sprinkling the site during the construction phase of the project. Vehicle exhaust during the construction phase and operation phase of the project is already controlled by state and federal regulations. No specific mitigation measures are required for this project. ERCRPT.DOC 'Cityof Renton PB/PW Department E .,mental Review Committee Staff Report . GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL LUA-97-I03, CU-H,V-H,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF September 2,1997 Page 4 of 4 Mitigation Measures: None required. ' Nexus: N/A 3. Water Impacts: No new impervious area will be created by this project, therefore, in accordance with the Municipal Code no water quality features are required. As noted above,temporary erosion control measures will be required in accordance with the Municipal Code. These measures will ensure that storm water runoff does not cause erosion of the exposed soil during the construction of the project. The disturbed area that is not paved as part of this project will be landscaped in ' accordance with the landscaping plan submitted by the applicant. Mitigation Measures: None required. Nexus: N/A 4. Aethetics Impacts: The subject property has several stands of tall trees that serve as a screen around the existing and proposed personal communication systems equipment on this site. This screen effect of the trees buffers the adjacent residences from the towers. If the trees were to be removed by logging or development of the subject property the adjacent residences would be impacted by these towers. In order to ensure that this impact does not occur, City staff recommends that as a mitigation measure that the land owner be required to covenant the property so that if any trees are removed an effective screen of trees would still remain. Mitigation Measures: The existing trees on the subject property serve as a buffer for the existing and proposed towers. The land owner shall submit for review by the Development Services Division a covenant prohibiting the removal of any trees on the subject property that materially and negatively effect the screening effect of the trees. The burden of proof will be on the landowner and approval in writing by the City will be required. The covenant shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. Nexus: Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) F. COMMENTS OF REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS The proposal has been circulated to City Departmental/Divisional Reviewers for their review. Where applicable,these comments have been incorporated into ' the test of this report as Mitigation Measures and/or Notes to Applicant. _XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report.. • ERCRPT.DOC • • PROJECT (Ern ) ¢Y¢ SUMMARY e o_ E¢a.+ w) E¢ •LCT m Tpv�vtg O 1 P MEM=Ellium 16OI00r.WEE SOO TELOil 043-50 ..•.� eE11lME,m Wo. uaOAcr m @Nd1.— r v a4 —.—.—_ ewMcTIffETP Oy.JCL_-¢D —_"_^.T•EiIOT Gu�e MIL �- --- OTu•-uav MOOR L MG. r CE1 r-- - �-- [ = EASING -MEMO -I. _ - IE]ITW W LOIt fLt91S��)1 • Ids I 4 le `l2 ER..�'1 R___ �..r__ Exit ! I E J �I_g4 _— IxATPG D0.�L! / l� 'TE LIT TC F CT ITT TILL C A RADb AITOCOV EN/10 311E wade, ! I y w>G.aTE -SRO`/-�9y—paaoeEa em d• 'U0 wtP1ic.o ANTIM A e16001 AT l T FAONOPOLE 1 TEL.107c _; WOCOED 6"''F"1T.e0•-O• RWM Sa•.OTOµTOT ea rm DRd i ITEL�1 M.0.sn1 I� ExylTOy !L.BLOC. AREA NaelcLe am as '�',In,CV• 1 TS'aM.sED am fiAP1 i i MR. NAME: I /� � I aoeTw-I yam R_e I cvemcrta.Tn•c WA ��� I I AREA A eD EXIOTaQ b+c".'Y1 �� I I •NGR N/COCO lGC I 1 [1 `` _•���///` I ,..4 MO KC LNG O Yj C"•,N RAVEL I LNG OBOE 1 1, j j• I. WDDDCD �. I iI SV ,:, j '- , ARE � .. l 1'..Utl•INM6TED. Z +� , .1b '>1 G•ee /" 1 aANAAe 41FlWlD[D A NO aR 0RADIC A 1/100500 0• t i J, ., •/ ' ° C �vyEN /!VEy� �uCGTID� 1 I i a�ED i,,,,,/, .. �I •i 2a. ray .i�-Y CONSULTANT I g!ITEAM g I1 ..®.ECT TUNACtRR JT COKYLTN] I COMPORAITO 1i i ce" E`�`4-�>. >0Sa . I SHEET INDEX MLLN.AvE.NE;a ..CnRJ—s- TEE.Sa-WT-..a0 OI 1p, I i I YIDc9ED >> SCGCED I ■}�` - EAN :r/T+IPO>wM g•6 01 I i I Ira a>TEs I al M eL �.INDEX. .4111(11111 Iyy77 IC�I �� I I T urccec I ale■.e>er V.4 1�1 �111 1 a.tEa •-1 ems EO)'.D.'.TA)101 PLAN rARAAL NM 00.-11567 RD-NM no ,>'•L 01E 01..N.oTd 010. O� I I I L • s I w-) OTT PLAN E1TT DETAIL EX!.OR ELEVATION A`"`�`" Cu1-1001 ieai:ii 1 91- 1 I : AMMITECIINAL DOT .ANRIY RATRJRI CWTACT.DAN"DEAN I a01b'• &— -��-_—_ 'TE-1 Rnoo ELEcnaut - /' SITE PLAN ICALE.I.•.MCC' LEGAL VICINITY MAP APPROVALS INIEMEMEIN DESCRIPTION . TAN PARCEL 1.1505 m!A-021.01.000 g • f ■ ■•■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • GTE„ CNI N M.PORTON 0M K.T00.0.1.0M YTWMT MOl0■0••�N 0 m EE00)L*DDoon.n Nor RM..WT. M� MEN-RF T•qt ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ DTL 100 DUNK.1A1a11.0TON LT10. .T OU11p. 0 M 6001,1051100 M R VALL IAO E)R01.10011 ef NI•T,OW? ■ • ■ ■ MAT PORiTLT1 O SAC mast 0Q-1MLt DEa]•em Y IQL01S CEfINN1 AT Y OTe1-901 �_ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ rue 0MK.T TO NE 7111 AT r�. T MO aFcrTol n vn1 M eolln+n•IeN o.•b ImI.uT.neLz.T.•am a wwn eAD AAI6N 3501T ro AN ole•I-Fe FXT.TNCI 19Ce.EOCE.D•OTC O AL011.•p fETR•WO7•J'.TQCe M TJ•C'OO.0 DECO FEET t)E110!.e•C'00.0go N a__ 010a•TO M K.T LIe 0 SAO OECTNN S).TAHOE N raw E AL00 SAID O.LO!•.D•Ae TEET TO TIC PONT 0 4fz, OTETI-yR F mlROO SC Owl M MST SO FEET OF M NORNOE.T 01M1e.0 TEN EOVI10.0.0IARI7R 0 SAID.ECI0O1 S). LTT0.NTIOLV0MRwr0101 •LE VALLEY 1AYUYT.Y0 OWT M NORM SO FEET 0 M CST SD FEET OPM 101O1115 SATES}-l!t N 60111651.010115110,16 1101T10111T OWNER O SAC 56001 a.COWAN*010 ACRECilk MON OJNER - 661m • yt�',�' T-1 ' , ' C f e-F R e^i"yam? —.■..I AI■. .o-.T • 43Ji: 19/ • D_E-Vt_LOPd!i p;f . • FOUND RPASc OSR . CAM OOM ON' AREA MAP SITE PLAN T4 RISER "0 I*sTGRu CONCRETE FOUND l-6R•55 POT NO ."• . 5 •/35/9T 26)Bs' t29.19• IN CONIC POST I-UP SCALE: 1w� 400' SCALE: 1w— 20' / /Y•T«OLE�WRe(ISO) 4 GOOD �PAt s6e-Se'w-E 1 _ � NE 12TH STREET • rWFO 8•A Sot 10' 11 t .6055 Srt /1]/9) /No/ 28)e5 1 r-' ,- eauRo� 10'ROAD CASEUENt .O TP•v.S.S9CY '�" ZPf(Y •r 15292741 LINE E•SLUEFT ——//•BAnPiv I IHom vw•ss[sscus u•PI / A• _ L La•non Pw•r nzs.an .--y• L '` TN v..-�L; .4. —raac w.Y.a 8WASS HASHER NO B$ .IND.SR DO i fL X /4._ t sii rs a•2T •/1sro) ON NORTH 90E ^P n$ NO/ DM.RIgR 'CL.OEDG•lOU OWNS — •' NO .(9SER Ae Nia. CAR --".....-04•`$ N'� L� vn2 3 59 AX S. �y • c 00u11CW I II A 0 / .}r ERO rG DAD i I '. ' / ) f0.Ma BAR ANIS• 10, R v '17/.3=/ I I — / ,/ /a° `�/, IOU . w $ O.( / / /..35 - / ui�+ / :g f 8 / T / l'N 8$ / ff P /Wx0 BAR SURKv Pr 8 ram e.P J CO / / :ivvi l J —1/ / /RVSN UIE IT•P) S / /585>0' 10 1e 15 56602 Ws .. 26.2.5. 10. 15 58620'581 15•1. 2e.ss 588'le sal ' SI • SITE INFORMATION CAUTION! i TN LOT NUM* C09]O�C061—a SUm[0 UnunOS E6rsT•X OE AREA ' s >rR Am® : s, o M.AsUS g SURVEY POINT 1115 •ND vnu.Prr0Ru•DON SNOW.w•. SUNSET - �AA1'MA CALL u0.OO,LOCATEcSERNq•,ENww.. !M=TACT 1 IC�)R FIVOCI(2011)250-0256 H•0e5.1g:4 F.4 i22a9'Yla-w ELEv-.•1.0 �1' 4 ARU 1 TAG>rya NAp2)•T10b93-H 125�9'�a 2�• 0,.eNWRSPRbR TO Oa.STPUCNCN LEGALDESCRIPTION 1-800-424-5555 g�y TREE LEGENLEGEND9 cacNo.AP. EPR n!rar a1.E.Esr N.lraNc EAsr.•Era THElOUNOMT MA7 OE2C cV9 fitOse OEa0 Rr[E ��� POrER LM[((6uP1[01 M ASPNAEI A5I.MG CWNT•CONTROL SURK•Or SECOCN ��. Po*tR LP.[(OKRHEAD) [lLv....0 O•N9.A 2l NORiN,P•NCE![AST,wN,•v•IFO CWNI., 10,TWA 2l N..RAG 5 E.,w.C1. 12 •L.ALOLP Po•CR(Unlln)POLE r•SNFGiOY; 2.RAPPER CREST SHOAT PLAT,RECOP000 trp[ `1Ruw• +LR ON)NL.ALOE[ W POLE OR ANCHOR E•010 THE KST.2 PEET•OP 0.9.AKTUE 5OUi..CAST AS UNDER At'28106119001 RECORDS OF ■ OS.OECIW WS O Ua,T POLE OR A NHOR *SOOT PCNd OUR•STY.PEO CGKrEO TO rm0 COLN.a•OLEO uNOER RECORONG NO.6.8»2>. un0R0NA A GAS UNE r515050->1 LOCATED 0i THE RING COUNM1,rASNWGTpa EKMFCEH TOES 04.0'U• GAS VALVE SA 405.Cnd a SP 90 u.0 01UATE v.n.1 COUNTY:T[5O.STATE Or VEoTWASHINGTON.AS PER OAST )6POLl YAP D0 THE HEST H•V Cr XCTKH CH.CMRR• Or-4 PHGT¢LR[(OKPHCA0) .05.B6l[w[,r. [REAM nTE[mSUo•xC[...ANY COuwiu[xT;OR nnE N0.3A2153-5. 1G Tl•1.23 n.RNG!E.C.A. 018 CC.CE0•P m TELCPHOM sANH0.0 ELEv.]26.5 DAS PLAN ODES NOT REPRESENT•BWNOAR.SURK. HAM n 19 2 OI.00U0.A5 fA —¢-. SE•aA LINE �� i0P EE m uEASU •4NREO OCr 0GTM CLEAN OUT REVISIONS 501OOL CSC.EK8000(N STGaN 00A9. • DATE OESER(0TIEM Dl. NOTE: TREE 0 ONES ARC NOT TO:CALF TREE --• w RR LINE C�Q !PV ��C +nyUr8a4u•.PoiET["T RSNT;vERETT voA15(Cn�.ao°:•. . . WATER 1R.roaT.TK.r dw6[E•�ty r.�Erwrw rCCINITY MAP IS'TO•••00K CAW-0 CEKI. TREES LESS ■ WATER 5C1E10 NOT TO SCALE MIN e•NOT LOCATED MEAT AS vaw — a•n u<SINCE GR. :DAv,-130rc:a/21/R{92 "' +•2 w DOTING SPOT ELEVATIONrH PRO-CET:9616G092'S 'I,, I It$E`+•-. err I • • A° '" 6 1997 • iJ=Nr Ll"1. IMINIMMIMII CtilV I , WEPT n.w.ALa,.n•Oi. 1�B IMOO 721-201/1 I WA.NOVO WPM f ILE TIVAIRTIOILKIRPOR �� 11 I I . cow.Nay eTo .caawrc,aro ii •OI=MO II L.O..I MALL We TO RO RI Y..I IIIIMGiIr�. n.rrrw WILT v aarAam.MAW PECK raw sa - SITE NAME. om c _ 0 - EC TO r MI OMR.ri.vr1.o AT MONOPOLE TOMIO • . , SITE ENLOE i ++ C'a+;e,^.tt 1 ::'%;'t°t.•�fi i't%%i3�µiL�+E+µ$a� LigEti< SITE NUMBER. WA 02C/e k°i. 3+''.y°, 3.*•F°'rl.+i''�'�'��°.'++'6 +n'11i''k '`• �'�,fi�`� `-'�.'es 3� ii w m°"'Q'ew.cm HAZEN i l�sL'r'! Q.7 .. •mw m.mow ur' OM=UMW CO MO ILITLo.O MA1ID Ur OHM TA MAt•PM rRaLL AO sons I00.1112I OLT•COOwO=TO Teir■L 6EKr Ieo■aelw MOP QroYOATOM KO%SOO 4;ICROP..OUL NOwYTOr ©EQUIPMENT DETAIL ©FOUNDATION SECTION yr I a•...• GRAVEL PAO.1 14..L__4_._\___-__-__-__-1.-_ ` a....eL r...„A.'.1'''.-',.% T cPGrOUo.as , --vy. , ... 1 . , . PROPODED 6LOPI LOC I LPK MOO APO Q r 1 ; �1 71 I p-P OAT!.. ' 1 1 11 hh 0 1 iii-N $j4$44444 1 tip/-_ • t' . ;1 I 7 ( 41*__._.. . i 1 11 i i / i . �,.* i i 1 1 • tt I �/ I ` ,ANTON&PONT RAN rr rOI 1 I 1 { ♦ a— o.wrw 0. : i I. 7Y /` "�" 1 \ ® j0 I / Tyr.VII.Hz.ir j j � • � I I / / A HI1 N ■ i I aai L — — — — — — — — Ab Lu.eLAW m 1 1 1 L-------------- ---------- .�Iil, �- 4,06 cl .ii ..• Barr.I.Ao I, u rAAA // irk DIMENSION BTS A 'I ,� EQUIPMENT PLAN �� PARTIAL SITE PLAN to q� / "�'�'M"• yr.r� `" w•.r-r ! p^ F+�l tt 9 F!"' '�..P'� • 6 1. 9i t r, JEVELUNI';r_;•:1" .11.1.11i�[-ANNIPIf ........ .. CEIV . . MCCM ODENAL 02.1.4..0.TO ............ON.T.41.0. OM 7311-2110 TO Ca•TRIC.O. .11IIM Re EWA a INTOOLA .1.11=11111=111 , TO I.0 AN11.111All PONT FL. .TO OS ClaNTATEO I s 1 ,77..........arm 1 , 1 ."CM C.11.14.1[111 • .....,.../..TV:4.1g4r ,, TOP CP....C.Cl.. III I 11131111 04 11/11.C.ANTE.. P.M.,TO CA.6.71. ‘re"."'"'"" ilitragmii s.:.• \ , 1./............ ..........• .:,:,:i.,. ...,./ I.=Pala Mk . .15.NO.C.L.E. rc .am 4'ii:„ ,\ / 1111 '''' • M.VA, , r , „....,„.,.,........... M1 II II li i..1 1111111111111111 . 11.0•C•1711 1 l ..:Pa:ii .ka'.4 '''''‘/1/ COMPS roes. i " ' .4. .:"47T. :74}V s' MINNIIIIIMIN - - TYPICAL MODIMA MUM OM. .o. 4.A \ VA?. ...• 4,...W 1::40 fY.,/.. , : > . SITE NANG AT&T MOP/OPOLE BITE '::::::).%0 0.g0:::*5: • SITE NUMBER. A......, , sEcrat•-few) . - ... WA 0208 a DINECTIOWL e"''`,,I,,". .....- S.R. NAME. • PAWL AMWAY HAZEN .14 I...I.. MT.. IME1111. -/ 1,1- .......1-•,...........,..........a..... I . E.....TREES WM. 4 7_0, e Pet,34,0.TO @ ANTENNA PLATFORM.., .....-IN.........TT. N, 0 4 1 /_„ / .. . - , \ \____7-• ..0/myna.ELEK . t : /4--/ \ • ."-- \ \ ,.. • 7 C.‘ / /\\ 4.-.141* ..-A--- '--- el (460 ‘..-,....../ s,.._,‘_../• \ 7 I ., .,,,,, ,....:\_ .,..\\ \ ,.....i .0 \ A % j 7, , V 'NV vA 7 . . \ . ‘."------._V-. '; / // 440) \ .----- l' @ . I g i<11411</<1 -, 44) \ . , IllIMIMIll ..._ \7'.44%,... .1 1.1* ... ..,.. . . • ',., -----'-''.. - r . 0 ilior, . so • , ., .• • .. 's. :, \ b. •k t.),;,. .\\ • t-, 1 ,.\\ ‘.. 11411 ©11 . ...," I ‘'\ ' wilt.' , MIIIIIIMIIIM /- •f „ \ \ -------'-'" \"---:\ :::-\ '\ . . . i• \ c...":4--"C--"- - 44 tp \ \ a • • : „-- \ 0 . :-.• . . ..,.. ,..• ...• . l• .0 qf 7 ____ q L . co .., ........:.,.... .:• ,:.•::, 41, ,/ ,- - \\, }21-7 - • ...... .... • ... . . C) — , @ ,.....:.::: ......... ..,- • ,) ,. :•,,,.... 1.9.0.011170. . .. .., 410 / • • M • • ; ______,„....„, / ,/ 's\------ - / . 0) ••- ;;'; .. .. // - --- ' •• . .' 1.(IPD / II II • • OWE ' \-...Z. - 4 .151'........ ...."------- - ----....„ . . c. ,..,.••.... V i Tr..ST.W.S.E.: . j„/",, a S a • • I I . EXIST.C.C.A.L.... MN.-.....4.1.4T KIP / • .III • 11 KV Li al.1 T.K . .. ,. .. 1 .....l0 I (1) • ... •,.. ...:.••••••,-.-:. tan=FN.TO 1.1.10. 0) . • •• -"'. . ...•••,..' .;;' .•:• ..- (414 / 1 \ -..N.------ -. \\`•••v ..:.:•:. , , 1,,,. 7 a 1 ....... A-2 @ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (7) LANDSCAPING PLAN // ;:r1Z1-70r--"Iliprl I/4.•T-e Tow 1••••••11 EMMM11.11 • ..... 0 ID 13 n7 • ut L,,i-,,•1,,:, ciiv MEIMII • 'L LOONALTC.TO TOTAR r CLIECT INANNIEN O ANT D.O@APCr YTI.M • mamma LATNT ITEM TO INNOLZEONOCTO 1 CON -0Rm MOMUM OTTO.IE TOTED. 1Wqu11W TO ON (an • • f!.TALL M.S.EDtr!•• r NO MAMMALS N A0510YAa UM t fl?C ,A .Me. ATNOAq GATE I f RRNOa at BAWD NAM MNVAGT eems imONTBO•,IO.OIL)ANSVIGO .OLT CATEO tw+TED OM ENO BLACE • antrum O.NAM LOCAL COO[A OIL rlOLL111OIA TAT.!r•e®oa. 'i i 4M'COIm A.PLAN.AI!POT TO PE ACAL2O NAM RAM NM NTDom TO EN• i lore aAOT ro anAmE m .+��- DMBLNTTATC.O MAN OM NI ONLY 1MLAA TOTED MOROSE 0 bL OALY. GAOLED A A NNO•rNTALLm NY OM TJA-Ttm ME TAL MLLOO O G(dORACiQL COCTOw • f2lL�.IDlt]W TO n Tor•DIAL INSTALLATIONTTOAT 111.1111111111111. .....:::::::......::......:•:':is ... I•AT1 l ALL LPOTRA EN MAO[ ITT!!f AwLL 0.9BIf NO N4 • Mn wALL N COAX e41"r'CRT <1•fIII/IIVT CNINEL r'IrA1R LLTrIAn ATABOTN Or II mrTOAne few PAL Ar»MOANS BLOOM Be ONION AT r I TOLL GOM Or NOTG••OIAf4o AN AaBtesen SMALL o®VA, ALL TINT ro rA•s TO •N•ILo`tm ...:. ::::::::............. s ALL cou�tA AMYL At cB.0.oATrm rsr A•TOeL v1ewAMN N ''i :;ri: ...:........I...:...... . Tol w ro rraLli uADE AOSOAICT WY AGL RAMP A INOIE>Om MALC,PON e�oLImm k _ i•.1,�•�Y -•��•�••y __:::!T_ ___._.1.-.-m.oLo•Tld OP oorfowTE. Ea ILT>,. IcaD r - {. • . s ALL OTILD ACCORDANCE I�EMMEN•IO nI•N@IXr wYl e.N •:•::`:••� A i A. A!am o OMSOL rose VI TOON TAN w rcrrAGTID Y a 001.MAIM ; - ; ammo:BM ATILGMAL PILL 4•A•T•IAOL�m rILD.Lrcr rtArlAaeTc • h ! tl-� LPN MONO or MA 100TrO•GATE E GOIR 1'ODTf6•m L ALL NMI Aoa NO WOT/LOL10E0•TW]NMLAOOrTAOTm -_-- "...,. TONIOOTM NO DOIeIILPAT i IMTR LA► —_n��u''='n"-i`=lril°n=ir=li"="-Lgn'= ___ I_I _ tG� 97E NAME: AOO.LICOVATL]l ALL d.TM YOET•Tal.TD OE NEOLTO TO• -<II_11;1t-11-11,A=_-11=i1=11-11=1il-liil_�1_I11.11•11=11 •lJt PAT DA'dLp1 ATM CO A•ma.AWOL ODCIcn PAD TEAL MOTES �AYONOPMI E L OLIO POT NO COMMrwn f-W OD..__AOlDr UTE ��� �i. Arran eo D. A6A OOI<LR Ala f•TTBN maps TO BMA L ALL IS4r•OTCIO STEEL ANAtl Q AVM AND NUDE Y LIMN 1 LPN roe,VW OD.rrL AOm r 4TMJ0f t s•f®aOC.DOIt18 RR1V0 VAN NATTD TYI!TO FYTd PAIN. MTV AAA Allr1 ream(ALSO NO3 e1•lCli+010.a D@•,r0 �OTTILININLI Q m CABLES s OATS PANE LW OD.Aom r 4TflJYaf 97E NUMBER: urn:N o.L•IN.OMEN ArA®d Arrwma'LLTTSY r mrTAw WA 0200 l TO.NO BRACE NAL•W OD.FM AOED AO AATMIIOR AGATE WEN 41NOD.PLOOLA PLO OM MAALLOOT rrre BOENOATOI 3.R NAME HAZEN QGENERAL NOTES &CABLE RIJN SECTION STANDARD FENCE 4 GATE DETAILIMIMIINI r•r.r. r.r-m• w••r-o• a • 1 I I sE 1 11 1 1 gC immiimml iimemmi • inimmim • • ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ • ARCHI!XN . . . . . . . . . . . . . • fA� 1.11111 • A-3 NM C1=PrIlf:Cr. MAMA '1. ~`9<<.; 6 1397 g_: IIMIIEMMIE •• I N.011 MLITT NMECTO1 -rcr],AD•NVOORO • DI!•:T�IrAi /7�1■1V1ATvvecoIymc s a MO MOMr000.0 sCLr.M 1!'w�PJ • .rACAO M RECL © MIX am Cl COPPER 0 r■}E.ISMS OM oVa.C.10i---,,,, NOR NTALLATM • a ECII.T L AITI.Ed CO SECTOR MM.MED OM TT. TYPICAL O ANcrcN rot cc d CI•ME. ++ A)TTN•Cy, YQOOLYCOM DI 0 Di y 'py SWIM �1 MOM■C1[m CO. COMM ON.T ® CI"0NL S507oo C. OA a5D5 .. .4.IO Ll.No • nlswS w ice. • �,.�. O�Mal M. „ , , �1• 1 name EMITIENTa ¢rRE O N DPMt C rC YI �, MANUAL T f�MbOt dIiCN - OM pO.TCb AI NOTED OD. cursor MIT Ealll'1•d! TLRIPI•EII WTNN r.■A]•I.O.RId 7a.-T�Om IAPNIX ann GAM,rAMM Ow _ - ®RML PDOOIW@1RR LC CrY AD INOD M.O ND TIa ITT over.cMTNATTd III II II I MT OM VA• I ?W.'�i I 'i�. NAM AREMOR,.,O. Q. DRCM.6r MOra -I*1 M.a Ammo O OI.aM ROD ® •�NOLA U I I I I ammo PI r) i I'.2• I - I • N w nw - LNQ MC PAD 1 L-J I .SNAN•IIC.TIN 11 I A((i{���-1� 0 M 21. O�.B.I'YAL@1 ffiL COMM PAD �t�r�,E.aD.- MAXIM �u TEE r6CC�RCIL CONTRACTOR TO MAIN NO MALL LN.CLT/10■ - R,van so LOY.OLTAK COQR.ALL M.COlECiIOM • �L MOPED Qi]@I!WALLED ELOCTIOCAL MIMI RR � ■ 707E NAMES TO TIE ECIUMNII NE TO IN O RADOM MANNIM DO COMM l%•MIVI•r EM.= I Isom.CMMEOTS Or W""Aer'�MOM.MMOMl!wwee FOR INT6Ip•CC►C.rwTrLON AT&T TO MEET MOM DAMS CODS Oi■&'E(f ATO.rr1P CO.TRCIKN 1 ALL PROTECTIVE OCVICIIMARL MR AN 001.0111014T W WILL TO OR CIIITCR TIYW,.DIAORRID ARE mow=MILT.ACNAL woo a NL laIROR WALL T.LO ME IMAM PEN Y 041? ALoe DAMN IMM TO • O MALMO WORTIMIT WIDEMT. . MONOPOLE NE PENIV.ROMAN ONLITTER IMPACNQ■IECON DOED canna/ COTRT MN TpJ!FlIEIE NMI MI REOnEMT\ALL SAW=ARMY l M COMM.ELECT MEM MALL EC 0O1.019 N ACOON®ow TIE DIMRNA OR CONTRACTOR..AMMO DM MONO.W0TE1 TO 0INALED wIb1AL!LECTO•••CM! SITE APPTONAL.d ALL TO EM NO MOR0.oREO DOMANI 1 N E OE•LN DAORNI TEN MM FMr ADDITIONAL MORMTb1 A MDOOR @CLOWN WALL U RATO NE4 L MITDOd rO1NRD EGOM/E.MALL BE 707E NUMBER: ARE IlDICm. • RATE)MIA]R WA 01 Oe ELECTRICAL SUPPORT BOARD B.R NAME GENERAL ELECTRICAL 1O1ES �I &ONE LINE DIAGRAM HAzou covvwn rLJRC WT1 ARC.orvv CQ1rAIR.PIDrERT a••1-0• P•P - All IICDO MALL C COMEL MOWN 10007m COMM 0.115/.ALLD■Tar Dar.■COMMA 4Rrr0.MALL SAT ALL POMO. 2l-NO MALL NI * �1 .1, . l 0r I.6F'OMAt■ •ta� MI TO ORM ALL 1l M ►COOIDI AM MECTW MD I I - r GUM MINN DOA NTRCVAL a w ALL GiLIRR+�L�a'ORC SMALL OL'NOIM TOTE RCMQOR O • mummer OfNW DORM AMA R A Fltrb(Apm 1 qq TIE NATIONAL COOL NEG DOOM CELL u TlVEROOD•PANEL rmavl¢BORNE!RATED, rOOPrBIr IIRIN MOM AM N NAM ,�.S NTLGOIa M M S MALL r0/ADS.;OCVbO,..eLE I•IA.!]MM. TC C61RBO CAO.Ef rACKAOE OM .. ALL n.e-.�C-.MPS MALL BE OL NTRTID OR MID. ♦ _ .ONE M A 4ELTIEL'lE 1 Tara.ry 1 ILL MINN NIDC TI!ELLD.O MALL MI M Err..ALL 41Sp WOVE - yy TIN @A.DM MALL Ol&ALVARO=ROO MtEL COMMAM i II 'III- WO MDR •�• raj I . ■ AMC PCLIOE.ALL 8ia4.NO MEWL.DEMISED BY ORMMN p I I_ -I(�EMI VATED �E.MN • ODAQ ND mom o arm MawM.s¢oorrAL IIOIK To MORON ovlRETG g D I 'III' wlMw TN•e reT cw1TRACTaE . I—•———I• "1.... � I I SI g ' MERAN O NO ARMORED EEGTTICAL WORM }]Q d nw,lrn►as Nvrfel y -I I I =1 I I: :Woo • '--• I I. I I ""`�I I9 D MDIION LIMO MYVART ONE TO.ITEM OMCOMM/ t g _L :III: I I I T� I _ �� I I 4 TIE MUM MOM LOGCTT 4 MALL f!NTIDVm TN TIe AOO.CGT U �91 11= ELECTRICAL COMMIX 1 I I p TT l NOIR PROJECT MANK6C a AM DRL5Lrn NTNJ.M WE : a C =i III ]•41 NE.MEWL. • - MDIw.O.T.TEI00 TO MT■M..ol cC.OIT1ve .. • I I_ - Y,OR Al WOW MN UTILITY- I II� I I al M .,DOD TER,CONTRACOR WALL MICSIM,ELT a TIE M•EMw N III :iII 04 M M • ---J• I I I I i1I 11 MOTET NY A Cl]LTMED MOMS ARM MIME I MO TO MT fE•WTN AlL IENLI.TO T•E 0.110 IMNAOET.TOR MAID E INDE C N .TI@IO nrTe bJ MCVOM.TRCM REM.TANCE TO EARN MCC..MALL MDT MEND -_I .EI•e....MOM TM OCEEDO TIE TAXlfM 0.01'E. _ _�. A.TIN MOLD . . _ . tl -^4 COMA.OR MALL TR TO MVO!ADDOIC AL _1 • I - MDOOCOMM*M IMAM. I -1 ,III McMMIDIdrL.w rinro MeRVIrz L I-J ENTRINCE 4 ALL MOM DM MALL. TN COATED AM OMNI MOLATED 4 • ♦ I MEA.O 9 I10D MEM)OOENNE NOTED.ROME MCIOO CPOICTOPS TO Rohm 1- MOM E 1 ) rove A.MIUTED O1 M•DI.Mw Stall.MaM Me MALL S -I' ,1 I 61005 ROD. ==IR NOCA00 ECCP.B1r UONT. LE.CNF0 CC ErREEL rove AT PM D.ACan MIME TUT 11_ ( - Ca4ACTC.MO �r,RE�rnO AO RICL NE r 5) COr5CTIME.ALL AOOMMAD1 MOMM.a.OTI0 CO.eorCR. -I Ell . MALL EN DMRE-WO CON Emd TTr.ALL OE OWMADE NO '-11 I-11^-1 I I-1 i IC• I I I-71 I ICI �_1 MIMED MINOR MOM.COMM.TOd 5OMNT ED Etl 1Rr NO RR®MOM REIM.MALL INCAOCELD TITS DOMrf A. . OO r•OMRIIIE MIUTED.COMMC.ID.ET DOOR MAID TO MOOunw • T CLEAR11111111.1 STA.LE...Tm.ELP•TAPPN.clean MTE DOIOLE•U,o COTIE.MOI COMMA VE IN OO ECTIM LOCATION NO rATERAL MIN l OCAMTE TO MOM OMNIM TO MD PO MILE AMMO COMM. ' OIDIIOMLIO AlO.mO L DEM ALL T•D M OT DI ,Ea. NTO ONE LINE DIAGRAM 11EYER'sOODB 10 Vm•OLO OMMEE MY MN MM.UE TRENCH DETAIL PER LOCAL aTLITIM. TAT..rro. DO WILE.P Mt MLCq a f••• rAI PM=MTALT I. TA,G•Ol Yr NDLE••I M. r• M. my OCTANT n PANEL.OPTION TOR V AM,.0L0 CITE 1®E MM.MN BARREL LIO '`3 T•.I• TA]C.RCM NV I012 I?Icln M•AC.e MC-M LO•NOLE I I YA•MAIM -AMEND COAL.arouo0 SETS,fY PLACED - MR YAM MN MUD WI!USE MOT LOIN MM.Llp i i �A"MOM OAR AT ANTENM.ECTOR LOCATION YAM-TM ro VW IDLE•WV MACNS RIP,GM MM. TAK•21'CFS V4•MILE•WV M•ACP6 TAM-POD Y.•DOLE r I.YACN i✓ANTEIY RACK 100 AlCOIUTm, ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Si ALL EW'OEEJ MFMCO CONECI-O TO BE COATED WTI V ■ ■ ■ ■ ANTI-co O VE Ma 004 M MOM.&VALOR.d TE CT•low. MN�MA COAX ■ ■ ■ ■•■ .FEET MOOT MI 1.1MJCT RA MER �1yI T, ALL MOLT.,MA OROANDI4T.INEDONM 47000 CNECIK0 ARCIIIIINN MALL OE 50E...06 OEM COAX MOO DAR AT TOLER DAEC 4 RACIIATw ALL ERObI®oIDOO.0 GCMICTON MALL NE RCN® I TO IRANMTa•1 vALLr ■■■■■M■■■Da 14CEwM.AM MECAT MAT IR N ECR MO. _i RNM a.TR N PVC MOM I ■ ■ • ■ ■ mom CMac1MR MALL NOT MARE COW.,MTN ANT rrTALLIC d iy-- TOO•=LOA GRADE OT?IAJLJ MUM RICE COau POOT.nrr, MT T.MIT EMI iv D MNALEa d CM1T.'• ___-r__._..----- ---g''-rCJOIIp,D CONE TWO.DA.! UTILITY■.'1.41.r Nllm M lES a__ . }I//////��..��1,,--,,���6///CC••• ♦I/ �-/•/-Ems-/� /o(i aa]O wRTRNMmEiaEan+mrt Mm • •n- • 1 L 1 1/ MWOIOO'EI]ODIMNrM-+ j 'NOEL - 'lro a ro.OIMA„d I•EOM A E■.y &CO PRIME IOEROdT ELECTRICAL MACE TM DO PER Local.IITLRT ION OL. �AT I�O MERVC� ROD.M R: TER DErAL 1.row POI IN 0 100 ME POJECT MOMtea]m D1T. ®GROUNDING DIAGRAM F r,�".P P�,E p :�MMa�• r•P MOWN r- • 1397 L),,..VLL"I .,._t•..)'PLANNING C.FTY C)F RED C)N City ..enton Department of Planning/Building/F u'unc Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Atrpo COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SITE AREA: 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx.60'x 6'each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft.tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information ' Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth ✓ Housing to Air ✓ Aesthetics V Water ✓ Light/Glare Plants ✓ Recreation 1I Land/Shorellne Use Utilities V' Animals 1' Transportation V Environmental Health ✓ Public Services V Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation tif Airport Environment N 0 10,000 Feet • 14,000 Feet t The height of the monopole is listed as 120 feet, however, the pole plus antenna height is 123' . The ground level at the pole site is 442 feet. This places the total height above sea level at 563 feet. The selected location of the monopole is approx. 1,000 feet east of the east edge of the Airport's Conical Surface, the outer edge of which has an altitude of 379 feet. The monopole will be 184 feet ABOVE this surface. Because of the height of the monopole, a Notice of Proposed Construction should be submitted to the FAA for review to determine whether an obstruction or hazard to avigation could exist prior to approval . :.. . Based on the FAA determination, the project should be lighted, marked or notpermitted. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS The City has neither personnel nor equipment to perform maintenance If the FAA determines that the pole should be lighted, then GTE must be required to perform the maintenance of the lighting. If the pole is determined to be an obstruction or hazard to avigation, and lighted, and GTE is required to do lighting maintenance, then City Risk Management should review the requirements for insurance types and limits. City Code now requires that property owners permit City employees onto their property to perform maintenance. We have reviewed this appli -'on with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where ad.%o •I information eeded to properly assess this proposal. i0 erg, /PPP Signatur f Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP. Rev.10/93 --- - - - - So8'3&'53"E� - - - - - - �'O `� 0 2 ' - - - -- 8-1-85 --- IHhIr M � 't T BAF •VZ � � OQ A-2 1-' J 0 __I SWING GATE — n \`� � T - - � PRC -Q- y EQU WOODED i, MOt` 7Th` /�� ' EX!S T!NG TEE. BLDG, ` / ti+ AREA \ 1 ENL �4S . ;; �;iGH, T .. OF 2 ..—..--- \\ ( `,-,• ,A SHE L:,�� - uSw-- `•%C. a\,,� I `� ��r ° �0 .. I \ 'S X`S-'NC "!OdFO_E- I ,‘\ CODED ,�, \ AREA • 3 '° i EX:S- NG; CH4!ti I Y'2.=1,✓_ r / . / \ ,.,,OCDED 115'-0 X � )-�eE. �, X� :. i BUILDING 1 _ 44,95�l CR SS SETBACK • �' . tiP�S 3- W- :ARE aid • .,m �.:� • A' 01lo C RRiEe QM WOODED w00DED -.� 1:—Il �, AREA "~/I -:- eel �', I ) 0! ` �i° co �� N88'38'45"W_� 0 4 .m '� Icn � i ? _.��- `����� / ✓ �J �� GRASS • �,A� Y %!"Y ,\��� =_XIS ING r: , AREA 'r �a} �.NES(Tl P.)-3 J °' >-- WOODED 1';; ; • . f,n ;.;:OODED •^ ^. - AREA 1 p Q .. , _ 281.25' 15 ';€u_-r-. 4 a - w__. ) mil_ ,_. 21 , . ....." 11„, ,.,.... 1-- . s....„.44p4.1.1„.. ..-Jiro : 47,,...-4, . mil.. . -.....- IV L . , , r._. 44_ -c. -A.' •-gt Ilit Nts W . AV' v\ I ' „2/6, :. ,. 1 . „ ( ,..,, oil :j . i i iri_'. . I. - co 4. 4( _-_,:. rk . crSkt44% rj--._,. "' 41 - ---.6 - o ma .. '11/illie. 9", ' \''' i._;,..ii 4404\si, .10.64tor ---1. + J.,4 • . . r7;«rrn I Fr, .0..4.... To iii 1*..0..w A 0664°glak _ Ili 1 .�� A A Yp m '( ::.- it‘ . .- . Ilk 7. iri i-1113' 15 41511/Ik'q r..." P iipVlil - _ ._. .., -: , _ 1 a if FifiP"'ITIID YI;47mir .' meA-3- _ Anil e-' larlp.„-4,0EttltEli.l:J- tiFi,10 ) - r 4114t.k,:.:. mi 'r4 3'. ii'lij i!It•ti-X._,. E 47_, 41111? kr" ' 2 - i III SI 7-: -..--- ","„N ii-. 1 I, .., CliCJ�" " �rILI it- 1 1.06, .rc f: .19gFP Ede ; s S� Alike 0�r,wit `n e • IJ11ltifl n ik ' .:r fl `J'. , • ro1-4116.7v,$),0, , io 1. 5o. I II`�+ � r I iI t:.t Teti e „. ... D �p>_,ri. �. .. �� WI g y pan mama r r� ` .. ..... 11 7. f ' i ._. g"I j �C+JM 11 �I �Il ft�:,'�. �, d ����mg rUirre,11. �`�. I ly \ — ;1214 Lamp., " i I ' aibuis . - I �4 Y Ir1 V�. .., _ I M M m , � 'Y.•I, ain�� .', 411fT Ib r pY ■_ar . Tim um , ) iwiiii _r 1 . a ail It Wt 1 I .'""''' fa I 0 LI-1-2 4611 _ —.0 fib, • :' . it ?_27,04‘.;;;,, 7. I. Dm I II , _ c� D q - j felts 0t- -ir. ■ -Y �1 -===- _ rr ___-_ -rs-__=_:.�_= - � ® �« ill . -. 8 `1 err P4 Eli. V, .. I1� , . yr . r ===_=== ======_=_= =_ ___ __=__ ►�..• Boa :1 .,- ,-,:ked":7- 7,x. 1 of . iL,,,t _ ; \ .1::-.:::::.. :.;..;:.:3::::::::::-;:::::::::::::... „.......:itt VII �r A V-t -.y •-• '1_J 113 l '_ - _- - ^ -_1-lSl .fir�Y�7 - _ _ 1=�1-===5=_l � s_c:_::::::_.:E:E::::::_-:, .... if_aga 6. -'- 4Nk.3,:i-:,it.- -.7".:Er-E=K:7-3-ZEME:7::.77:_::E::.:E.-:_f::::::::::::Kf3:1.:::::EEE-::::::15.-...3-_;_a.::_:::::::::-..::::_::_::::.::_::::27-1::::::::::::_::::EEEEE:__:::::::E:E:., ----"\--f kill 1111, ''..-. .;11;1111,7 -"\k\sl 61 .• ly .,miltl..,1.-7-11.,;,—;_-;71, -:-::::::-:::a:::::_.-E_-::::_::::::::::_EEEEEEEE:::::_t-EEEEEE-:-.-:EsEgEE:36:::::-E-:::_:::::::-.E.:E:::::_:::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::_-__:::-:-._:::„ IN imil----R_.----t--k''. ::::::::::qt::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::E::::::::;::::::::::::;:::::E::::::-::::::::_E:E:::::::::- -:::::_:::::::::::::K.:E::: ', -:-/r-N--- f 'Atia-1,21, . Aziffm. ----------_-_-_-_-_-_-________._x___________________,„ __:_:_x_,_____________,..,..:_:_, ,:::::::::::::::-::::::-_::::::,„:„,,,,::::::._-_-_-____::::::„:::::::::,:::::::::::________:_,_:_::„,:::,:,:::::":,::::: i ,,,,,,,,,,,....,:-_::,-„,,,-„_„_„ (---fi, _ay•4 ( i tiv..{ttv� --vet __=-=___=7.— _f__--- --- 4 4/A " : iii \ 4ps n i _, jilt NIL f h" ,,_.11 ). 6, ii-:::-:::-:::::-:::-.::E::"E:::-:::-:::".•:::-:::::::::-::_:::_::::::::::::: . ----:::-:::-:.1.-I.:-::::-.:::•E_1:11:::_:1=-:•:::::_1:_::::1:..:--f.:1--::-737 w1 / ap�— 164. # ----'r3,-.1 ' k . " Ma' UMW/ ---,i•-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::- , ,. ,,,j: A_ --Ks--_-____::::::::::::::::::::: 1, ' iii,„ . . . 7/,,i -_--:::::-7..:.7:::::::•:.:7.::::::::::-- . • _-•-.7 i , 4-E E iiii:_::::-......i:......- • • • 1 1"76":17a tiellealit:?::::::1:::-.7:-:::•.:::::::::::-:::::::!:!-L--i• li IllidalTh' [ ,a4r-All; --'-' .--- j4 zni• 4 ':' ti. 7:::--E---Z:1-:---_----_--..§E-17.---_---..---1..--..-----_-: fil i I I 1 :1;517e5_, IffiI - C _ 45 P q _ __ City _..Benton Department of Planning/Building/1 Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: 'Timms P®lazthiim COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SITE AREA: 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area [BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx.60'x 6'each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft.tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information ' impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics i Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistortdCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS No i u t, 114 CV ee42e. ►vl a Ve vce oea i I y Z v y 5 f v� 114, wLe t �� /�z� 1tiU tv6,/14,,c, n, il,cro1lovl -fez ve.q ✓cd • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS IV0 Cvvbl iMefr ' We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. l vJ vV,,g g/s/g Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City _.•tenton Department of Planning/Building/I ,, Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:s ,a Loa* - COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SITE AREA: 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx. 60"x 6" each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft. tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g:Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable • More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information ' Impacts Impacts. Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities • Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistoridCultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1°0 u�w�:a 1WirOrovZ � public fJcvt�l�S � 67) -rem Yerlv:'d Zvi t he4 pvvyos a We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to property assess this proposal. / f�et,Q U>J $�/�i , Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 Amok City o enton Department of Planning/Building/PWNorks ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ( l sevVKee, COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SITE AREA: 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx. 60°x 6°each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft.tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare • Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities • Animals Transportation • , Environmental Health _ Public Services Energy/ Historlc/Cuitural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I V ifVe C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS tv'w( We have re sewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a 1 l nal information is needed to prop ily assess this proposal. p� erkif nature o 'irect Authonz Representative Date °EVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 I iLltl 1 %.J 1 11 iL L/1-1 1 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU City :!enton Department of Planning/Building/f �.Works A U G 0 8 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW EET �v ® REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �^r'(rc elf-el]044111ln. COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SITE AREA: 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx 60'x 6"each)for a total of 12 antennas.'Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft.tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable - More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing - __ Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Histork/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet liD /�^^ g� ���dGf �0T�, B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 4 4 C. CODE-RELATED COMME S We have re awed this applica%•, ith particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable Impact or areas where add onal information • :.ed to properly assess this proposal. I / 2 Sign tur of Director or Authorized Re. -ntative Date DEV Rev.10/93 City=_=,enton Department of Planning/Building/P•, Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Ptah —t—" r �Y\Rallt'w —lv0.a.R,e•-COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 1997 ta APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08,CjjOF RENTON APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 AU6 1 1997 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE iCsUt�t.��� apt v tale SITE AREA: 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area I BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx. 60'x 6' each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft.tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable • More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor - Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water L ight/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet I - B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 1 Jc> cowfklc We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City enton Department of Planning/Building/P — Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: plc COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SITE AREA: 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx. 60"x 6' each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft.tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment . 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet a/Z,6 /-24).,ezr7-2- )ez-ctti____2 B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS c //&1' C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS lh ��. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed t roped),assess this proposal. //i /9 7 nature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City_. ._enton Department of Planning/Building/F,;.,.. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: �11C COMMENTS DUE: AUGUST 21, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 08, 1997 APPLICANT: GTE PROJECT MANAGER: MARK PYWELL PROJECT TITLE: GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL WORK ORDER NO: 78251 LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE SITE AREA: 1.81 acres-800 sq.ft. project area BUILDING AREA(gross): N/A SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx. 60"x 6"each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft.x 2-1/2 ft.x 6 ft.tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers annteana. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable - More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Ught/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services p/ Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet -Th /92a t 4-rnyC7 ) }OD a e L,Q.er? '- I c L) B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 1 C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this�p posal. 4 /7 CZ6e / C�2�t-<1 -/ Signatu of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 , .__,_ , , . ORIGINAL ._,‘ , , 1:.}}.}.:..:....:::..:1.:.>..>.;:F;::•}r?.} Yf;}:.•t}n o ` • } nx; ; o t y O}S rr•.•,E,,g.,..... F / ...o.: » f / :.: i .--- -. . 6.. I ":.:: �,: aa4..w , rV % ; tD �:bNM,. RVECS . S N:�? . TH?! {l/» Yf . ~ .. -•, uf � 0*w ? Yi i:>x . :: ;.? ; :at ? PM* 1� . y IrYF O: f.. T D 1G ROPERT iO NER�.:n Ji :? } 1 yn. Fry : aa , : Nv : v nn :.wthn300f@tOf beCSti@f ? } Y % agx ; ;{ ,4 - 1 c'T PROJECT NAME: . / CS S.M l v/-1-d_PJ o b-f-Rz / • APPLICATION NO: LU '11 ' 10 3 , C U , fc(.r The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Renton School Dist 435 Main Ave. S 102305-9077 Renton, WA 98055. Michael Fleming 11212 137th Ave. SE• 102305-.9173 . Renton, WA 98059 • Sutherland Assoc. • 1585 Broadway 149450-0030 New York, NY 10036 1 Randall King & 17024 160th Ave. SE 516970-0095 ?-//,;. -.,,., Eva Chun Renton, WA 98058 - Robert Steger 11220 137th Ave. SE 102305-9096 Renton, WA 98059 . ,. Charles Keitzman, Sr. • 11238 137th Ave. SE 102305-9249 Renton, WA 98059 USA West Apt. Fund 5820 Miramar Rd. #200 • 516970-0075 , San Diego, CA 92121 Janice Greggs 8721 116th Ave. SE 102305-9124 Renton, WA 98059 Suellen Warnes 14620 SE 116th St. 102305-93704E -' > :? , . Renton, WA 98059 - t#s'. �`1", Mark Zimmerman 4600 NE 12th St. #1 516970-009 te4"0 Renton, WA 98059 i, N.4 _►..d• ,M r eekest3 8.7,RiqX3 ilefaftelebdditional sheets, if necessary) . , ptfi ,46 • (Continued) NAME . ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • NUMBER • • II • • Applicant Certification - I, I_ _ r-s i LNv4^ , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: O ('ity of Renton Technical;;Services Records D Title Company Records 0 King County Assessors Records 1 , Signed _ Dat Z� a ( plicant) • NOTARY j ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of Washington, residing at balpfvde i U)P 6uvrti on the ;\'-day of , 1997 . Signed �!►'d (Notary Public) r>}>::{}s:=::-:r:+•:r:::::::::::::.cirri:}::••::._:.::•{.:}:• ,Y,s ..J.,v.. ,•:.J.:.. z.:} f;:Ren on::• .J:,>:iii}.{.r::.:... :{,}'.}}'.::;}: :..}.,.:. : •4 �< :..}::{•}}::v:::.v::;::}:::...: ..'{ v:\....n4J.r.......:: .}}ki}xi.}r.;• :ix. {}}. • :v••}w.vi•:•:?v, n...... .............. w::::x-:+..::v:x w.v:x:::::..,r,.:m,v?:::•xn J:4}:•.. •.. ,.v:.}::}:% 4...... ........x.:::xv,J?:?::?>4}:�:}}:i}f{.}:L::v:•}:•i}:J:•:::..v.4.}:•}:•}}:?:.:.:J::•::v:.........r:.,..:r w::::.{.::::}?::::.,•v.J: n ::.......:....:':.irr v{:.yyti.:.vx:........ .:.:•..........................v:::;•,..........v.....,.. :..n.. .. ..... ...J :..::.v},{?:s:>.:::-,{.,+.,.,.f. .......4:•}x:::::.. ..::•};:•-:::•:•...:.: .. \.v,.......r.......:...............,.....................................::}}:•}}i}}:.}......v.. ...,.,....,., .............. ....LC-'•nti$:C;i:;:j4;:}v:::y{.}y:'}::;:ri;:,l:::i;:^i:?}v{ij•<?:Ctrtr��.. ...:. :::....................::•:}•:••::::x:i•:.J:•::{i.:........::...:.v.. .{.::::.J:•i$:.r{•v:J:••:r.•:x4•:}•:%{w:•.,•:•::::v? {:J:•..y,.}}?r.. +{Jii:•}}:i:v}}.v::}}� .+.:.v...,. ,. n::i:v:}:{ti •:{•}S}:.:}•}}>?'?��:tiJ�v:v v:{:'i•i{{•:'}?i}W:rJ;:{}::::::.}}:•;{;....:\v:?:..•:.}}A?{v:::::::::::::::::::?:::::.v::::::;.;}i{j::;hv::•.,.;;.:.r?...,.v.,.......ry... .. ........r::+::.......v:+::rv:%v:?}i:�}..r :.}.{.� ..4'J....:...:•.,::.,::{?:.:.v}.:::±::.-.:;::.??:.:.::•:••.:•:v::::::::::::::r......... ..::: .,...{...... .: :. .. :v•}:r.,.:::••}:r:::•,.ti!,+.,'S.w'�::S:ii?'ti:tv::\+:n•.:•}:.,`N,.:{:.}2}{::{r}Cv .}:,:.v,+tr�'.•,.4. ?. ...4:{:{,:•::--::::w::::::?{:{:.:}v.:J.:v: .}'vY::x:::::::.v v::x:.t.:.v:•::.r.:-:O:.. .,vJ F•}:. T �:; •I ...........x.v:::::::: nn...n..........,v::{•}:�:•::}:.v:n.........:':.:L�.... .... :..}}}::?q.+?'•'+::4{•:i+1<?�}C-:{:};:it.>.:::::ii i{: :}.:;.v:fww V.y., .}}Y. ....:...................r..{r........................................:.::.:..::.x::::::•:::v-w::.:w:':f^i:}�}:r?}}::}:{.:?•:j}i}}y}i::•+••i'+.'.;};•..:}}'+i.:::rv-.:,..Yn rv....:.:......:......:n:£.. :.{,{l:•� ....w::::v:.::v:.v::;;:i•}}?}:J:{•}:?:•isfi?i}}:.i}i}}:J}}:•i}:.}ii}:•i}}:{.?::J}::.::::::•:::::::::::-v::::•v;::.:::w:-.v:::::v:.::::::r.....:. r... .,.....n .\ ............................... :............ ..:::v,n:..:....:...::..,..i.•::•:w:.:,.:r{.:n,{m:::.,}.. ....v.+:w::is v...r..,.::.vv::rv:::.::::::x•,3 ..}............r., r..,tv:`?r.Jxri::}..{S•.::::x.{.....4 i,... '-}:�::• "`:{?h:::. __. .......:...:........ .................:v:;•.:v::::}}:{v?:}:ti:v:4}}Y.-}}}}}}?:-?:�i}}}}:•}n:v:•:.v::v::::,}•?{-}'•}isJ:i};n}:{J:J}{.J:J}}:•}:^}}:......:::.. :::•: .:::-::.- ..... :.:.:?.::......................... ................ ....::::.�::::::.�::::::.�:r:::i{.:J:.}>•{+..r......v.}....:;}}:;.is.}:-}}}'•}}}}}:•'}S.^•.�:i:?;}i:�:•:i '}:ar•<%i:•:%•?{-}x•}}••<:•R.:.. ..di{: scab ::.certt :;:th �:nottces< <t .e>� ro asec��:`a:::.,.r ::�::i�:,.:> e:}:.;,.;v.,:{;.Yif?.}}••:":'`.�,F:^_..., } ��: �>• ' ...::.:..:Y.:.:...::..:�Y,::..:.at. 0�.:. n....... .......:..:.:.:..:..:::}.:::.::.v::x:::::::...w:::::n;::::r{::.;.v nnv, :...... .v. \•:?:.:::..}•}}:•:J:•:•}:4}:}}}}?>:ii ?i.`:'rtitir„ •: C.1. tTi :.:v::::.:}:{?.}:}}:.::::n�F.�:::::::.......:.v:,........................ ...... - v.•::}:{•{:}:::::: w::::::;.{..w::::::::::n.....::::•::.:.............-.:.v.. +}d:>.ii:•:}iR±•}:•}}C}•::.v{r::...:..J..:::.:..{..T,..::{}:}:{.::yr}•.{;,;{. .. ...:... .:...::.....:..?..n,............. ....... ..... ...... rv}i:^:n}}:•}}:::::::::... .....f.. .?J!{S{.}?}:.}}}}:�i:}:i:i:4i:{•:ti:ii i}Y-::4:w:.v: r.•4{'r.::v.v:.v:•... ...;,•{}:::;M1i?r.}?+:•}:•}}:+{•}:J}'::}{.}:?}:r^}.,}•.:{:q::J:ti{JY:i.$xtr.....,.. .i:?•• v:{}:±{ i +J:4 i'.:w::.}v::::ry:h:n... n.;,..Y..v�r.....{...:......x.n...x., .,v}. :i•:�:::. •. r:.}:.v.,:::•.v.::x:::.:}•}.rv.}}?r}:::.::.v:..:::::..v::.:w:.nw::.v:::r?:i•:i•}:ti!}}:}:?O:v"::•:•..::. :.•:,.... :.,.......... :..:......-. w:•}}:•.J}:.v.v::::}•:::::rv:-..n.....n..rx.....{vivwn...:..::..:n::�::::i}.:.}}:•.w:.:.v:.{•}•n,}•.vv 4?�.•±2:i: • • is}:{:ii::;..`:::::�+:>i};.:;is�ii:?;ii:::??::}:•: ::i»ii:i ri?ii?i $:{::ii}:i'r:tii:i:Ci:;:�iii}Y•S}}' • Slgne .... .......:.r.:.,..,,..,.,....::.?.:.}'. :":.:.. :,:.:t7a��.<• ..yy ,..:.v:/n:::::v:}•.....:..:;;v::•}}:}}::w;:•.•}w::;;. .v.... ... kip ..,.., .;..r. x:::::. ..v::::i?•S•}:?i•}}'.-'r.}}:{.}}'.:............. .i.}•}h.. ... r:?ri::•': :?�+7 ..J. :.}:. .A- i •:::•}:J}:.......:{:4:vn...•-r?n......::::•:::::. i:v.:};.?Y.: :::?:iiiii ii2?:.....:n.,.:.: ix...•}::^ •i.. egai•4• k{f•?{}?•:.fr.:v:£•r v:v.,v•v:::::•:v:::}::x::.v:............... �+, �:i'.\.;.. }:i\�'ih�?^'{:?ti?•. : .} •::},•}•}::x:?::::v:N.•w:Si?v:;},:[..}}G}Cx.\. v�•.S•'{:'}�:{}:::��5:. ..}.,r..]}::}4i:.•:� �+ •' :i'} -�ti i''• :i?w:::::r.• •}:•:{::».�:ii�}:i.} ..f..\. :.{.- :vy:,�{4T wf}-;:.}:}:}. ..y.,.::...::i............::v}}::?•}}:•?}::•:--r}:•::i}:•:: . v£ 4}:r �}i? v.✓' ,rr. y .?{, •v\?}i+.Mv'. \.•• �CVr•'•: rn''i`4'ii}v 'Y{:•: .... :}�:]:t�:.. ?}i:::.}:•Yv'�Y✓'�:J:v}i}:}.........:......... }::?v.,•}:'?:::.$} :.i•}}iS:v....... \••:}n..Y.\{¢+}' �{•Jff•}.4:•i: xr : .... y:•:..........:•::::::•:{•};•}J':i•:;±•?:;+.:�:?;::<};-:•}:•}}Y.{:::::::•.}};Y.;Y.;:•}}:{{?.}}:?::... .. .::••:::.}},:}' '•}.. :. rC,{ /f.C':?':'::::%yL;:i:>:}:...:Y...J.4^x •xf:.J}:. q.}}:;. ::.;.:::?•:.;:::.+..r}:::::•:}.:,•..�:.::::::::::::::.�::::{.::�:.}:.ter.+:.{•::::::::::.,•: •::;£•:::?t:. ,.,a... v• O{•.,y:r .,4;.. :r.,#:,:.,-:•.:,•.c•:':.`•;r. -vi , .Y�.F: .::f•.:•: •.<..d:;.}:•x., + 'i'}ir:{••.,?>o'•`:�:i,:5:i}.::::v:.}..4•.- 9 •'k`,: .. .. ................ ..::...:.:?.;+.:::..:;:;::>:}2::isi}::::::::i:}:::;Y::::i::;;:•}}:?•};}::+?•}:}}:?±:.:•?•;xJ..... .............:..{:..r. .. •S::'}r.:}�''{r::.xAp.``f�•'.. .... ..#}2:+ .., :iS'.. ,:a :::::. .., }v. {:r{.}:±i::;?'ti�i?�.. ::::::::::............}}}}........................n.:.... J}nv.....:. .P$$.v•:hJ:..r:rf.:•.Mv ��{ ^.h:J.,,v v.-.:......:;...) �.:Y?... .: ......::v..}$}•::::.v:::-.v;::::'.4:{6:{:{.:.}}Y4:v.?:^}:::::::::.::::.::::::ti.:i.:::m:::^:•*....::::::nw:::::.{.....:.......n:..... •}Y?J}:•'Y•.. .... +n}$•.4,•4•.:..} ' .�:•::..�.�.:: .:?,.. v:ti{ •v'•?'•, v.4:}}G}ii'ri•:ki:Yi:::: .\yC:..�::{+ �}• - �±•:� � +v::::r:::::.�•}:•}.::'{.}::rnY{::{:w:::•::::.:::::........r. ..............:.........?.}?'-ii:•}•:{.}:•i}}}:... .:..}•..:.S:ti`:'LY•:{{{}:r..�?{.`.}.::. •.:}'..,..-...... .. .J:.,:.Xr nT�.' EiOtie•t :Otkt. 0tWO itn �::ti ,.YA. , :::. ... ..:.:..............: .. ... vko.::..:. i;�.m.....::�::::::.:�...:. {�'.s.:�.:,{•:v::.- r,}�:.., :><.::::::.: hingt.��:'-;v�:::,> ....... ..:... ...... .. .}}:. x�b:-::::::Y: �..n. ....n.:.,.....n..hrJ.-i.�ir�:} ..1.?.:+ �f.•{'?•YY.{:'{•. �h:?w'•'•'r+•{•. A}}+f:} ;:v ni{±; . .......... . r ...:. :�......+.. •' >:...,....�,�"..:;.}:- :�:,�o•n<>the:�::::<:�:r:>:'}:: >'�::: da-::;Qf::::_::> ;r;.�'�}.?}.,,:?:hv{v~;{.<.:.{..:..........,'i� �.'.:.Y?,'•�w �......... ... .....r.... .. .......................::::::::::.v::::.................,......... .... .v...,... {:::•:}::•v,:.•::.:::n•:::::r::•::{^Yvj�.}Y'•:{.T}+}Li•:::::+.irn::`^Y• tit f.. � .sty :. yy }?:•.v:;}}?yi•}::::........::::}.}}}}}?}}}:•{::nv;::•.}w::::x::::::'vnv::v:.,.;.......... .. .. r..... - �i.h•'•"+i+j%r�Cr.}x+:•fi :;;,`}:;� :•.v :.:4: •ti'k{•^•.�:: d.....:.v::::.v:.:..:vx::::±"i:�:r:. .?. ?:{:} v},p•{}±.i.:•:,.;:{•:�C. .,}4 :..-`\T.,• ..... ..:..:. .. ..............n.... ..,:................r..............:::::�w::::::::x;x}:{i•'•}++?:::..... .,:r.,iY{.}+:{J}::•}}}'r:•::ii•;}..,.:::{.. v.,�r};�t. v.•:'.•},•.: ::::. {:...::•:j'`}:y n........... .. .: w.... .v:v;. ..............m:{,•.v::w;...;...;......:..;r. +.2'.:, ::fir}•}r �ri}'r ..J :. ••.?:+? ...J..:... ':�i'ti:}?yr{.}:•}:.}:•}:•}:::•ti}:{.}.}'f•:s?:{i4 •}.,h�'ti Si ed:::::: :?.. . ....... .:.::.��..:::.:�.•-......... ..... .::v:•:;::::{ri:»>£+i£i:<:A::<k:>� � � �J}� >�k�s�:,c�:;: • listprop.aoo REV 07195 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 2 • Oti'VYic;�• • 4. ''''Iv10 NOTICE OF APPLICATION • ' PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: AUGUST 12,1997 A Master Application has been tiled and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. • PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97.100,CU-H,V-H,ECF I GTE PCS MONOPOLEIDUVALL • ' DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each ll • antenna array would Include lour antennas(apprex 80'x 8'each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also Include two equipment cabinets,each approximately eight feet by 2-12 feet and six feet tall.The proposed facility , would be capable end available for co-location of other carriers antenna. Proposal would require environmental review _ . and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. - • GENERAL LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE • STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: WA PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Conditional Use Permit Variance . . Comments on the above application must be submitted In writing to Mark Pywell,Project Manager,Development • Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 22,1997.This matter Is also • scheduled fore public hearing on September 30,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave.South.If you are Interested In attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division, 277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled.If comments cannot be submitted in waiting by the date indicated above,you maystill appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing • Examiner.If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional Information by mall,contact Mark Pywell at 277-5586.Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. . PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION • DATE OF APPLICATION: AUGUST 08,1997 • . NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: AUGUST 11,1997 • f DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION:•f ,AUGUST 12,1997 I(+ i ,,-. F +�� CcnixLL i e . • NICMLw1a9 PIJi.1:yy ,� N` Ili- _• ' . • • 4- . GEmMLOT.DOC w� '1 j — r1A -�.-' . ' .._ . . CERTIFICATION -- • I, /"l/4'�/V,�ij/r7 / • . hereby certify that copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on / &ufi i 27/ '9 7 Signed: : %s0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS • COUNTY OF KING ) • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that hi ,2i au? T I• signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and vgfu�rirary,,.act4or th,e uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. • ' •- 9t',6/.,�• Dated: fh 219 9 • G� ('4/ �" o" aa iz ton Notary tic in an f r the Sidi p/ ,V,Va a�� 9 • Notary (Print) MARGARET '!._orrA .��, • My appointment expir NO TA R Y,OOC . CC) NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: AUGUST 12, 1997 A Master Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF/GTE PCS MONOPOLE/DUVALL DESCRIPTION: Proposal to construct.a 120 foot tall monopole with three antenna arrays. Each antenna array would include four antennas(approx.60'x 6'each)for a total of 12 antennas. Site development would also include two equipment cabinets,each approximately eight feet by 2-1/2 feet and six feet tall. The proposed facility would be capable and available for co-location of other carriers antenna. Proposal would require environmental review and approval of a conditional use permit and a height variance. GENERAL LOCATION: 1160 Duvall Avenue NE STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Conditional Use Permit Variance Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mark Pywell,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 22,1997. This matter is also scheduled for a public hearing on September 30,1997 at 9:00 AM,Council Chambers,Second Floor Municipal Building, 200 Mill Ave.South. If you are interested in attending the hearing,please contact the Development Services Division, 277-5582,to ensure that the hearing has not been rescheduled. If comments cannot be submitted in writing by the date indicated above,you may still appear at the hearing and present your comments on the proposal before the Hearing Examiner. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional information by mail,contact Mark Pywell at 277-5586. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: AUGUST 06,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: AUGUST 11,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: v AUGUST 12,1997 •, aSEt CENTRAL w TT HIGHLANDS PLAZA •~''•��_ y a..jj• A: m • a - 6 Y nCil n o J —90 i • 4w .1- al • ai al al —Q � W T PO.m :j .O' • LJ 1 •(zee' .••.. an a.4 0 j • Ya .�:: '.§::..E •I mcam.•e.cwn GENMALOT.DOC : : 9 ,.,., .R 'a • a ® us.o n,� 'n• _a ._ a. , taw.e x•o-a iea•. ,_s� CITA. 3F RENTON • Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 11, 1997 Mr. Paul Inghram JM Consulting Group 500- 108th Avenue NE,#1150 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: GTE PCS Monopole/Duvall ' Project No. LUA-97-103,CU-H,V-H,ECF Dear Mr. Inghram: The Development Planning Section of, the City of Renton has -determined that the subject application is Complete according according to submittal requirements and, therefore, is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on September 02, 1997. Prior to that, review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. • -" The date of Tuesday, September 30, 1997..at 9:00 AM, has been set for a public hearing to review the above-referenced matter.' The hearing, before Mr. Fred Kaufman, Renton Hearing Examiner,will be held in the Council Chambers on the second floor of City Hall, Renton, Washington. The applicant or representative of the applicant is required to be present at the public hearing. A copy of the staff report will be mailed to you one week before the hearing. • Please contact me,at 277-5586, if you have any questions. : . Sincerely, • Mark R. I,.AICP Senio nner • Cc: GTE/Applicant Mr. Robert Fricks/Property Owner Arran rR noc 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton,Washington 98055 This paper contains 50%recycled material,20%post consumer . ............... 0 0; M AS APPLi CATI O N. • ::::>::>::::<:::::»>;>:<:«<:;::;:::»::::>::<:;:PROPER::<::: ::€:::, . .....:..::P.ROJg T..I.NE IRIVlA7 Note If tfie a IS more that one;egal owner;;p[easg attach an additional::: >'•: ribtafiied'tVfaster A'pplicat�on'1`irr each":;own r..;' ....:.. .. .,.;:. ... ..... PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: Robert' E . Fricks GTE PCS Facility WA0206 Hazen' PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 1621 Camas Avenue NE 1160 Duvall Avenue NE l • CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): • Renton , WA9805'6 102305-9081-09 • TELEPHONE NUMBER: 2 3 5-0 3 3 6 • EXISTING LAND USE(S): residence and telecommunic ations s owner) facility PROPOSED LAND USES: • NAME: GTE additional telecommunication facility • �• 'COMPANY(if applicable): G T E . EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: • ADDRESS: 2821 Nor t h u p Way , #2 0 0 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): n/a CITY: Bellevue , WA zip: 98004 EXISTING ZONING: • • • • RM-N • TELEPHONE NUMBER: ( 425) 739-5000 PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): • n/a • o SITE AREA (SQ.FT. OR ACREAGE)F: ELE ED Inghram, , 1 . 81 acres • 6 4�C "GAMPANY.(if ap'alicable): • • J M Consulting G r o u'p PROJECT VALUE: DEVELOP TENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON approx . 80 ,000 ADDRESS: 500 108th Avenue NE , #1150 . • IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? i. =lTY Bellevue , WA ' ZIP 98004 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? no TELEPHONE NUMBER: (4 2 5 ) 6 3 7-8 6 5 0 1 . _�...5� `:p•>:;i;§3?;;i:; '° .'sisi :�:: :i?i:pii;i;?:'•';`i:Ei:::;'•i r. . ::...::. :.�::::. :;.:....::::: sa ... :>:<:'> >�>::<<'<< '> >': _;::: � Y. Atta.ch..5e .a . Iieet�.:>If;:.ne es . .1................. ....:......... ::::::.::<.:::.:;:..:.>:.:::::.::.>:.;:;;:.::;:.;LEGQE..:DE.S.CRI.I )N<:.OF.:.P:ROPERT.:..:..t....................... .::$.:... .. .......... .c ::.Y............................:. ..... See attached . • • / • . j, . . . II ........... .:.:::::::::::::::::::::................................................::::.:::::.TYPE.:O.................E..C.....Tr... ... ::................................................................................................................ r«.in.e f:>::>;«<: <`<_`< < > '» ' '>`€`< >>° <s aff»willdete m e e.es........ .... :.;>;:::.::::: ::::::::.:::::::.:�::.�::::... h .ck:<:all:::a I(cat( �ri::::t . -.es::::t :-a: `a:- -:.: �:::E.t. .....t. .......................:. ....::::.::::::::.:::::......-...:::::.:..::.:::::.�::::::.�::::::::.�.�:::: ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: - COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT • $ ' _ REZONE $ _iILOT LINE ADJUSTMENT • $ • — SPECIAL PERMIT $ _IjSHORT PLAT $ • _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ .iTENTATIVE PLAT $ xi CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ . _';PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ _;FINAL PLAT • $ —GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ U VARIANCE 4-3 8-11 . C $ . (FROM SECTION4-3 8-1 l . E _ PRELIMINARY —WAIVER $ _II FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ II ROUTINE VEGETATION — MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ 11 _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ — CONDITIONAL USE $ _VARIANCE $ _ EXEMPTION $No Charge LiENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ _ REVISION • $ - I, (Print Name) Paul I n g h r a m , declare that I am(please check one)_the owner of the property involved in this application,X Xthe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of authorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers hereir contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. • ' ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary f'e blic, in and • Paul Inghram for the State of residing at = _ (Name of Owner/Representative) 'rlle.vve s� Ct-o 1 , on the'day cf i - ' , L__)L : ___dt. . __ , .., (Signature of Ow resentative) • ( gnature of otary Public) : ff < <`<R'`Rgni::<`'•::•:..gon i `> < <»< >«> .................:.:.�.::.::::.�::._:.�.:: ............ ............. .....:::.::.(Thfs:.s.ectlon:.#o:.b.e..com I.ete...::...Y::..:..ty:.........................:..:::::::::::::.::::::::::::::::.:�::::.:..:.::::::._:.::.;::.;:.;.::.::...:._ . . ....... . . :::>:<1l::s<: ; .:::.::::::....... ..: .: :::.::..:: .�::.........:.:. ::::: ECE.: .SA:.�::R. SHPL.::::GU. LLa..�.�.::: ....... ::::::::.::::::::::..:.....:.:. ...:.:::::::::::.Cft ::.�'IIo..N.umber...::,:.....:....:..::.:::.::.::� ...................................... ::::::::::..........................:.:::.:�:::::.:::::::::::::::::.::.:.....................................::.::::::::::... ::>N»>:;:::;:.;:.>;;:.>:<.::;;:::;.;:.;:::;<.;>:.:;;:;.:.;;:.;::.:;;.>::.;;;;:;.;:.;:AAD...UW:::::fPU D. S.M:<::;5 M E.:...IVI.H..........8. ..:...A..........A... ................. ... ' _. .. and �. �......�....... .....:....:..:........::.^.....F•.^::............^....................................................:..................................:::::::::::::::::::.:: .•:. .i : :ii: : .:_..:.:.:': �:i::::��'::: j:::;' ;:;;r.;i;;:y;:;i;::.'::i�i:+4iiii:`;:;'rf;:;i:..: •.. • ii..v..v........:.:::.......:......:;.:.:...:..:....,'.i i :: �:S::j}:i:}v?Y;j!`::::::i:}:iii<i:?::y�:::<::i:i$:?::{:`:::i::iii ::i:>:i?:4:::?:4, . E PROVIDED...:;.$...... .. . ..:::::•.:;::::iimi• :.;::.. >;;:: <:::> :::;:.::::;.;.;::.:;;:.:.:.�:..: TOTAL.P.O.STAG ..::.:.....................:.... MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. 342353-5 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE NORTH 275 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE - ._ NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W. • M., IN KING COUNTY, _ . WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE WEST 42 FEET FOR 138TH AVENUE SOUTHEAST AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY DEED UNDER RECORDING NO. 6387727. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. THE DESCRIPTION CAN BE ABBREVIATED AS SUGGESTED BELOW IF NECESSARY TO MEET STANDARDIZATION REQUIREMENTS. THE FULL TEXT OF THE DESCRIPTION MUST APPEAR IN THE DOCUMENT(S) TO BE INSURED. SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 , RANGE 5, NE QUARTER NW QUARTER. PAGE 2 OF 8 August 6, 1997 Conditional Use And Variance Request WA0206 GTE Wireless Communications Facility at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE i DE-VELopA.._ C'7Y "ev C�NNNG GTE Wireless, represented by JM Consulting Group, Inc. (JMCG), requests a conditional use permit and variance to allow the construction of a Personal Communication System (PCS) facility to be located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility is an effort by GTE to provide complete coverage throughout their wireless communications network. The proposal calls for the construction of a 120 foot monopole, two radio equipment cabinets and an array of twelve panel antennas. Information about the proposal was sent to the city on May 9 as a request for preliminary project review. Preliminary review of the project was conducted on June 5 with Mark Pywell. This proposal was carefully planned and designed to have minimal impacts while providing the highest quality wireless communication services to the surrounding community as required by the FCC. The chosen site is the only area near the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Duvall Avenue that is more than 300 feet from a single-family residence (other than the subject property) and screened by tall evergreen trees. The variance is required because when the pole is'sited so that it is more than 300 feet from an R-6 area of King County it falls near the Hazen High School athletic fields which happens to be zoned R-8. The commercial areas along Sunset Boulevard were evaluated, but if a pole in that commercial area were 300 feet from an R zone it would need to be located on the front side of one of the commercial buildings where there are no trees to provide screening. There are no tall buildings or structures in the vicinity other than the poles evaluated in this application. 2 -GTE Wireless Facility - - August 6, 1997 Existing Site Features The property at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE is approximately 1.82 acres, or 79,105 SF, and is roughly square in shape. It is about 275 ft in length on the side that borders Duvall Avenue and about 288 ft on the side bordering NE 12th Street. The property is heavily covered with vegetation including many trees. There is a house located near the southern property line. A 120 ft tall monopole with two wireless facilities is located at the northeast corner of the property. A second monopole has been proposed by Nextel and has been approved by the city, but has • not been constructed at this time. A gravel driveway runs from Duvall Avenue at the southwest corner of the property diagonally toward the existing pole. There is also a gravel area directly north of the existing pole allowing access to it from NE 12th Street. Zoning The site is zoned RM-N. The properties directly to the north of the site are zoned CN although apartments are located on the nearest property to the north. The properties to the east are zoned R-8 although they are used as the athletic fields for Hazen High School. The property immediately to the south is zoned RM-N, is owned by the school district, but remains undeveloped. Three hundred eighty four feet beyond that is a 4.13 acre parcel zoned R-8 with one residence. The properties to the southwest, between NE 12th and NE 10th Streets, is un-incorporated King County, is zoned R-6, and range from .65 to 2.29 acres. The nearest parcel in this area to-the southwest is a Kingdom Hall church, while the nearest property with a residence among the R-6 zone is more than 300 ft from the project area. Properties to the northwest are all zoned CN. Townhouses occupy a small strip of this area. An Albertsons, the old Ernst store and other commercial services occupy the rest of this area. Description of Proposed Facility The proposed GTE PCS facility will include a 120 ft tall galvanized steel monopole capable of supporting at least two wireless facilities. Twelve send PCS antennas will be placed at the top of the monopole in a three sector array. Each antenna is approximately 60 inches by 6 inches. Antennas may extend up to their height above the top of the monopole. Two radio equipment cabinets will be located at the base of the monopole. Each cabinet, containing radio transmission and receiving equipment as well as electrical backup batteries, measures approximately 8 feet long by 6 feet high by 2.5 feet wide. Please refer to the attached site plans and elevations. 3 GTE Wireless Facility August 6, 1997 A six foot chain link fence will surround the radio equipment cabinets and the , antenna support pole, restricting unauthorized access to the support pole. There generally will be one maintenance visit per month. The PCS facility will operate and be monitored twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. Standard Submittal Requirements 1.) Master Application: Eleven copies are enclosed. 2.) Environmental Checklist: Eleven copies are enclosed. 3.) Mailing Labels:, One set is enclosed. 4.) List of Surrounding Property Owners: Two copies are enclosed. 5.) Fees: Checks for $2,000, $500, $400 and $3.20 are enclosed. 6.) Project Narrative: This letter includes a complete project description and justification for both the conditional use and variance applications. Eleven copies are enclosed. 7.) Neighborhood Detail Map: Twelve color copies of a Kroll map at a scale of 1 in=200 ft are enclosed. 8.-13.) Site Plan: Eleven copies of site plans that include landscaping plans and elevations are enclosed. Drainage and tree cutting/land clearing plans are not applicable to this project. 14.) Plan Reductions: An 8.5x11" set of plans is enclosed, as are two copies of a 4x6" PMT reduction of the neighborhood detail map. 15.) Color Display Maps: A colored set of sheets T-1 and A-2 are enclosed. An extra color copy of the neighborhood detail map is included above. 16.) Justification: This letter includes a complete justification for both the conditional use and variance applications. Wireless Communications Submittal Requirements A.) Map of the View Area: The neighborhood detail map depicts the location of several photographs taken of the existing 120 ft monopole. Photo number (7) is taken from about 3000 ft from the existing pole and demonstrates the extent of the view area. From that distance the existing pole is barely visible and then only when 4 GTE Wireless Facility - - August 6, 1997 viewed through gaps between trees and buildings. Eleven copies of each are enclosed of each page of photos. B.) Photo-simulations: The photos described above show the existing pole which is ' the same height as the proposed GTE pole (120 ft). The proposed GTE pole, and the , planned Nextel pole have been sketched in on two photos, the existing AT&T monopole has been colored in to make it more visible. Eleven copies of each are enclosed. C.) Service Area:' One map demonstrates the service coverage provided by the, existing or planned GTE facilities in Renton, Newcastle and King County without the Hazen site. The green color indicates in-building coverage, blue indicates in-car coverage, white is where there is no or minimal coverage. The second map shows how some of the white areas in the Hazen neighborhood are served with the addition of the Hazen site. Eleven copies of each map are enclosed. D.) Inventory of Existing Sites: GTE operates a 50 ft monopole at NE 4th Street and Union Avenue, a 100 ft monopole at 164 Avenue SE and SE 128th Street, a rooftop facility at SE 72nd Street and 132nd Place in Newcastle, a 70 ft monopole at N 30th Street just east of the freeway interchange at Kennydale and a rooftop facility on the stadium off Logan Avenue. A 40 ft monopole has been proposed at the Greater Highlands Shopping Center near NE 12th Street and Sunset Boulevard. E.) Site Plan: See enclosed plans. F.) Applicant Agreement Statement: Eleven copies are enclosed. G.) Draft Lease Agreement: Eleven copies of pages 5, 8 and 9 are enclosed along with the signature pages. Removal and colocation sections are highlighted. I.) Design of Support Structure: The support structure will be a 120 ft monopole made of galvanized steel. The steel color blends with the typically cloudy sky, but the pole may be painted if directed by the city.' The slim nature of the monopole --- provides less bulk than comparable self-supporting lattice towers. As demonstrated with the supplied coverage maps and as apparent with the existing pole and the approved Nextel pole, 120 ft is a necessary height to provide adequate coverage to the surrounding community. A lower height would diminish the available services to the community, would put GTE at a disadvantage among other wireless carriers and would necessitate the placement of additional facilities within residential zones. 5 GTE Wireless Facility - - August 6, 1997 J.) Structural Integrity of Support Structure: Structural engineering, soils report, and structural details will be submitted with the building permit application to demonstrate that the pole design meets or exceeds all building code standards. Development Standards for Mini Facilities A.) Definition: The proposed antennas are less than 10 ft in height meeting the definition of Mini Facility. B.) Permitted Use or ACU Permit: The mini facility will be located approximately 15 ft from a property line bordering an R-8 zone. Mini facilities are allowed with a conditional use permit if within 100 ft of an R-8 zone. C.) N/A. D.) Color: The facility will be grey or painted as directed by the city. E.) Equipment Shelters or Cabinets: The equipment cabinets are made of finished painted steel and are completely self-contained. This results in less bulk and a reduction in fire risk from the typical equipment shelter. The cabinets will be located behind fencing and existing vegetation. There is at least 15 ft of vegetation surrounding the project area. English Ivy is proposed to be planted at the base of the fence surrounding the equipment facility. F.) Height: Please refer to the variance to the height limit later in this application. G.) N/A. Development Standards for Monopole II A.) Definition: The proposed monopole is 120 ft in height meeting the definition of Monopole II. B.) N/A. C.) Hearing Examiner Conditional Use Permit: The subject property is zoned RM-N requiring a HE-CUP. The mini facility will be located approximately 15 ft from a property line bordering an R-8 zone; the monopole itself will be slightly farther away. Please refer to the variance to the required 300 ft setback later in this application. D.) N/A. • GTE Wireless Facility - August 6, 1997 E.) Height: Please refer to the variance to the height limit later in this application. F.) Antennas: A mini facility (array of twelve panel antennas) will be attached to the top of the monopole. G.) Equipment Shelters or Cabinets: The equipment cabinets are made of finished painted steel and are completely self-contained. This results in less bulk and a reduction in fire risk from the typical equipment shelter. The cabinets will be located behind fencing and existing vegetation. There is at least 15 ft of vegetation surrounding the project area. English Ivy is proposed to be planted at the base of the fence surrounding the equipment facility. H.) Landscaping: English Ivy is proposed to be planted at the base of the fence surrounding the equipment facility.. Additional vegetation may be provided if the landscape plan is considered inadequate by the city. Additional Permit Criteria A.) Visual Impact: (1.) Antennas will not exceed the height of the support structure by more than 15 ft. (2. & 3.) The specific site location was chosen to combine it with the existing and approved monopoles, so the proposal is in character with the existing site. A variance is required from the 300 ft setback to allow the proposed facility to be located next to the existing facility. The project area is an open space surrounded by existing vegetation. It is currently all gravel and is being used as the staging area for the Nextel monopole, so our facility will not increase impervious surface area or require the removal-of any vegetation. If the existing vegetation is considered inadequate by the city additional landscaping may be provided. The existing vegetation provides a high degree of screening of the proposal. (4.) The equipment cabinets are enclosed in finished painted steel that provide less bulk than traditional equipment shelters. B.) Noise: City established noise levels will be met by the proposed equipment. C.) Fencing: Fencing will secure the facility from unauthorized access to ensure the safety of the community. English Ivy will be planted at the base of the fence so that the fencing blends into the landscaping. D.) Lighting: The facility will contain no additional lighting. E.) Advertising: The facility will not contain any advertising. 7 GTE Wireless Facility August 6, 1997 F.) Building Standards: GTE will submit an application for a building permit. The facility will be designed and engineered according to all applicable structural standards. Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria B.1.) Height: As demonstrated with the supplied coverage maps and as apparent with the existing pole and the approved Nextel pole, 120 ft is a necessary height to provide adequate coverage to the surrounding community. A lower height would diminish the available services to the community, would put GTE at a disadvantage among other wireless carriers and necessitate the placement of additional facilities within residential zones. A variance to the height limit is requested later in this application. B.2.) Proximity to Residential Structures and Districts: The site is relatively removed and isolated from residential areas. Apartments are located in the commercial zone to the north. The residential zone to the east and south is occupied by Hazen High School, with the athletic fields of the high school being closest to the site. Large lot residences that are surrounded by many trees are scattered to the southwest. Commercial services are located to the northwest. B.3.) Nature of Adjacent Uses: Apartments are located to the north, athletic fields to the east, large lot residences to the southwest and commercial buildings (Albertsons, etc.) are located to the northwest. B.4.) Topography: The project area is slightly higher in elevation than Duvall Avenue, but the area is generally flat. B.S.) Surrounding Tree Coverage: The subject property is heavily covered with vegetation including many deciduous and evergreen trees. Additionally, many of the neighboring parcels are well covered by trees. B.6.) Design of the Tower/Visual Obtrusiveness: The facility will use a monopole for its slim design and will be gray in color to blend with the sky. The pole will be located within and behind many trees to screen much of the facility from view. B.7.) Ingress/Egress: The facility will be easily accessed off of NE 12th Street. B.B.) Noise, Light & Glare: The facility will not produce noise above the levels allowed by the city. Lighting will only be provided if required by the FAA. The facility will not result in any glare. 8 GTE Wireless Facility - August 6, 1997 B.9.) Availability of Existing Towers and Structures: The existing tower supports two wireless facilities. Our initial analysis indicated that the tower would not structurally support the proposed GTE antenna array. GTE approached Nextel about locating on their tower that recently received approval from the .city. Nextel has already allocated a lower position on the pole to a second carrier which, similarly, prevents GTE from locating on the Nextel pole. No other communication towers exist in the area. GTE considered all of the commercial properties in the area around the intersection of Duvall Avenue and Sunset Boulevard All of the commercial buildings in this area are no more than 20 ft tall and are not suitable for attaching a communication facility. General Justification for a Conditional Use Permit A.) Comprehensive Plan: The proposal complies with policies U-5, U-10, U-30, U- 100, and U-101.by minimizing impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses, by being sites amongst appropriate landscaping, and by being sensitively sited. B.) Community Need: As the operator of the PCS license GTE is mandated by the FCC to provide wireless communication service to the community. C.) Effect on Adjacent Properties: The proposal has be appropriately sited to be as far from single-family residences as possible while also being well screen by existing vegetation. The chosen site works to minimize any impact to the environment or to adjacent land uses. Variance Request GTE requests a variance of 285 ft from the 300 ft setback for monopole II structures from residential properties required under Section 4-38-11.C. GTE also requests,a variance from the height limit of 65 ft (30 ft plus 35 ft) set under Section 4-38-11.E to allow for a 120 monopole. Variance Criteria B.) Special physical circumstances or conditions affect the property such that the strict application of the provision of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use or development of the land: The property, while 1.82 acres is only 287 ft wide. This dimension makes the property physically incapable of meeting the required setback. The placement of 9 GTE Wireless Facility - - August 6, 1997 the existing monopole and the area that will make best use of the existing vegetation is the northeast corner of the property near the property boundary that borders the R-8 zone. This adjacent R-8 zone is occupied by the Hazen High School athletic fields. The nearest R zoned property with a residence is located to the west of the facility across Duvall Avenue"more than 300 ft away. The vegetation of the subject property provides better screening than any other parcel in the neighborhood. This is the only property in the neighborhood with an existing wireless facility and therefore the only property whose character will not be substantially altered. Due to the vegetation that provides screening, the large size of the parcel and the existing monopole, a new wireless facility is a reasonable use of the property. The requested setback (15 ft) is necessary to locate the monopole in a location that provides optimum screening, minimal disturbance to existing vegetation and keeps the facility more than 300 ft from an R zone with residences. The requested height (120 ft) is necessary to provide adequate coverage to the surrounding community, to allow GTE to compete at the same level as other wireless carriers and to prevent the placement of additional facilities within adjacent residential zones. C.) The variance is necessary to insure such property the rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under similar circumstances: The right to build a monopole of similar height and design has been granted to two other wireless carriers on the subject property. D.) The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity: The variance will allow GTE to construct their facility is a manner that is the most compatible with the surrounding neighborhood while meeting the mandate by the FCC to provide wireless service to the community: The facility will not be detrimental or injurious to the public welfare. This is the most appropriate location and design within this neighborhood for a wireless communication facility that meets the mandate of the FCC to provide coverage. GTE has carefully selected an area that has many trees to screen the facility, that has an existing telecommunications use and that is more than 300 ft from any R zone with a residence meeting the intent of the setback required for a Monopole II. The facility has been designed to make optimum use of trees for screening while using existing open space to avoid the removal of vegetation. Finally, the facility has been designed in accordance with the Renton Zoning Code- and Comprehensive Plan. I f ' Statement of Co-location and Facility Removal July 22, 1997 GTE will allow for co-location at the Hazen PCS Project in such manner that does not interfere with the radio signal of GTE's PCS facility. GTE ensures that the GTE PCS facility will be removed within six (6) months after the date of discontinued operation. GTE Wireless 2. • NOTARY Kate Stephens Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in and for the State of AP +� ' ashington, residing at I NN 4 f 1p on the ZZ day oft( , 1997. NOTARY (3,;y PUBLIC corf a• - - -- — -- — ---' .tip, Z°• O •� REC "��aameut'� FJVE AtiO 1397 OEVELCPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON • • RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK LIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen 2. Name of Applicant: GTE 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant Contact Person Architect Horazio Calcagno Paul Inghram Amy Bailey GTE JM Consulting Group, Inc. Architekton 2821 Northup Way, Suite 200 500 108th Ave NE, Suite 1150 12951 Bel-Red Rd, Suite 110 Bellevue, WA 98004 Bellevue, WA 98004 Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 739-5000 (206) 637-8650 (206) 637-1007 4. .Date checklist prepared: D V:0July 21, 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services Division. D VcLOFPV L PJ LA 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing,if applicable): CITY o�R r.cAr ,NN/NG Immediately following building permit approval. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. One or more additional antenna arrays may be allowed on the proposed tower below the proposed GTE antenna array per the permission of the city of Renton to allow for co-location by other communication service providers. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A soil engineering study will be performed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known: Renton Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Building Permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) GTE proposes to construct a Personal Communication Service (PCS) facility located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The proposed facility calls for a 120 foot monopole with three (3) antenna arrays. Each antenna array will include four (4).PCS antennas (approximately 60" X 6" each), for a total of twelve antennas. Site development will also include two equipment cabinets, each approximately 8 ft long by 2.5 ft wide by 6 ft tall. The total project area will be approximately 800 square feet. Please refer to the attached site plan and elevations. This facility will be made available for other carrier's antennas in the future if their installations are technically feasible and compatible with GTE's installation. The site will not be accessible to the public. There generally would be one maintenance visit per month. The facility will operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal is located at 1160 Duvall Avenue NE. The APN is 102305-9081-09. A vicinity map and legal description are included on Sheet T-1 of the plans. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth - a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly; steep slopes,mountainous,other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 10%. GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 2 Renton.SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, .gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Underlying soil type is unknown. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. None have been noted. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Only minor surface preparations will be made to accommodate construction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. No. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? Project area is currently compacted gravel. Project will result in no increase in impervious surfaces. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Construction will be limited to the site area and existing paved surfaces. Natural areas will not be disturbed. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., • dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. There will be very minor emissions associated with vehicles delivering equipment.and construction materials to the site. There are no emissions associated with project operation. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,generally describe. • None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or impacts to air,if any: None are necessary. j J GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 3 Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what river or stream it flows into. No. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities i f known. There will be no surface water withdrawals or diversions. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood-plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or,will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 4 Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems, the ' number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. There will be no waste materials. 1 c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including,storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any, (include quantities, if known). Where will the water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Project site will sheet flow to surrounding land. The will be no new measurable runoff. Existing drainage systems will not be impacted. 2) Could waste materials enter ground surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None are needed. 4. Plants a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other , X evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage,other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 5 Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Existing vegetation will be maintained. English Ivy will be planted at the base of the proposed fencing to reduce the visual impact of the fencing and to help it blend with - existing landscaping. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk,heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: None are needed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to complete the projects energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,manufacturing,etc. J A new electrical meter will be installed to provide power to the radio equipment. There will be self-contained batteries for emergency electrical backup. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any? Low power PCS equipment will be used. GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen - Page 6 Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 7. Environmental Health • a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. No such hazards have been identified with other similar installations. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards if any: None. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction,operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be minor short-term noise associated with the construction phase of the project. There will be no new significant noise associated with operation of the project. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: Comply with the Renton Zoning Code. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of.the site and adjacent properties? The existing use of the property is residential with two telecommunication facilities on one 120 ft monopole. Adjacent properties are athletic fields, multi-family, single- family, commercial or undeveloped. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. No. GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 7 J Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT ' c. Describe any structures on the site. There is an existing`residence. There is also an existing monopole with two telecommunication facilities on site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RM-N. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Not known. - g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. - Not known. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work on the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: None needed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans,if any: Site will be screened by existing vegetation, is located away from residences and next to an existing monopole. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. None. GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 8 Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated. Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The monopole is 120 feet tall, antennas may extend as high as 125 ft. The pole will be constructed of galvanized steel. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views in the immediate vicinity will be obstructed or substantially altered. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any: The monopole will be grey or other color as specified by the city. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are athletic fields associated with Hazen High School just to the east of the project area. GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 9 Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If'so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any: None. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on,or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archeological, scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. The property is served by Duvall Avenue NE and NE 12th Street. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable to this project. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking would be affected or eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to • existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The proposal will not require any new or any improvements to existing roads or streets. GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 10 Renton SEPA Checklist EVALUATION FOR AGENCY USE ONLY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. This is an unmanned facility and will not require the use of water, rail or air transportation. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known,indicate when peak volumes would occur. The facility will be unmanned. One maintenance visit per month is expected. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example, fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. - No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, i f any. The equipment will be monitored 24 hours a day, seven days a week. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available to the site: electricity, natural gas, water,refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Telephone service will be provided by GTE. Electrical power will be provided by Puget Power. Water, sewer and natural gas are not required for this project. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is rel ing on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: �t-A ?i / \-6::: I GTE PCS Site WA0206 Hazen Page 11 Renton Area w/Hazen Site SEATTLE_MTA_SECTION gliPEFF41IA/ GRANET Ver 2.3[Build 16] UTM zone 10 ill A. User u: seadb10: lid Wed Jul 2310:06:391997 - Aill el 1 1 r ► Signal Strength[d8m] 4732N A.0I I BELOW-93 , ift. \--- I I -93 to-80 I ABOVE-80 lliii% . 1 i� k GO V IIIII --� ----1 ,..1 g lii Illm,A-c illi me \___\,,, ,..: ill kalif in\ . r oingst, -c= 47-30 N � I..! �\�� Lik tifil ILTlij --I ' 1 J ! .iiii i 0. s NE E �, �,., Scale 1:50,000 ____. 1M1��1I i �, ` mile 0 0.5 llIIV' op. 7.411 1 11ll F.,‘ N` iv - + km 0 0.6 I 1.6 2 tip"liida , � ` i Y. . I al q m h. ar \ 1 PI, _ GTE Wireless Seattle ' 2821 Northup Way,Suite 200 1 122-12 W 122-10 W 122-8 W Bellevue,WA 98004 Renton Area w/Out the Hazen Site SEATTLE_NTTA_SECTION VL1WINJ � �_� ,i- GRANET Ver 2.3[Build l7 $ Map zo - UTM zone 10 User ID:sead6 bat 1541) ' i Wed Jul 2310:05:081997 Ai t,- ,ift, \--)._, Signal Strength[dBm] 47-32 N BELOW-93 1 -93 to-80 f i ABOVE-80 r NI I ,_ t. S i I' �® tr ,�� ‘ hi , IC -1--1.1 MEN --1 liar' 8 Ati Ell NIP d Lige- A wAozoac . • r .0 v r riml.411, ialat 1 1:1 ' 11-1 ,.., \:.: ...... — IAN ..,,:\11 4` wa- � 5 f _ �t" Scale 1:50,000 .1111 _ 0 . t 1, 1I ,� ' tulle 0 O.b ,{ to V 1 It 111 IF i wir km 0 0.6 1 1.6 2 a ..a It ■G i li :- � - , . GTE Wireless-Seattle 1 � 2821 Northup Way,Suite 200 122-12W 122-10 W 122-8 W Bellevue,WA 98004 t - - - - — _ .y� .:... VIP....• A•••••. ' , , :'• j • Ili . t ' - / f 4. +.4". 4.....•.. f' • rlo:. ..-t r ...•• •.• YA• _�.,4 r . At, r •wry y.• -. " • .. r. 4.4 u•.it'� ''`, • '-`A. ,r • . .R •v , y� i.�.A"AO..- 1` , may.!'. NI...4. "..�.... ii ..4, otN . - `11, *44P - '''' .411t,..IX: . #,.." ..4,4., . .. View looking northwest from about 900 ft away. The proposed GTE pole is sketched in on the right,the existing pole at center(directly west of the GTE pole)has been colored in, and the Nextel pole that will be located south of the existing pole has been sketched in on the left. f .•.. / . .441(0.• ,... , I -4:- I. ...• J... " +fir .3 • . r '-♦ -,� et ;. . IlfipeOl. .,., ~T = w -rC jUilk..--'" 4441:11"1Mr,%,-*I 1 4 i.mi ., Tat it • . 644: . * ti 411:ti: . Iry - k-ait - liPf • :ii ... , • -ti I rT • . i its yy.. • L -.. '...i. • • .n � ;/I' . . . • View looking south from 600 ft away. The proposed GTE pole is sketched in on the left, the existing pole at center (directly west of the GTE pole) has been colored in, and the Nextel pole that will be located south of the existing pole has been sketched in on the right. w• i...., ♦:t O -, . it:.4:- , :- '4 . ` • It a f �' �- � a� em ' �� '�' . 71 • �= ram••• ..~ w s. . .1ZVII:y ) .....► I "t 1.) View from the apartments (zoned CN) located just north of the proposed site looking south. The existing 120 ft monopole can be seen in the center of the photo about 600 ft away. The proposed tower will be located just the east (left) of the existing tower. O . • .c. iii dm, ji, 101. - y t�' • rZiVI •2 . bC f i f ' r i j ` ow . �� a v , .. -- 10 i. ' ♦ _s•• •-' ,,, A'. • t. -.. ...... de t _ +y - •Awe•. -?7. ,.. 4 1,- 2.) View looking south at the base of the proposed site. The existing radio equipment shelters are just right of center, the existing pole is behind the trees, to the left of the wood power pole. The staging area that has been O cleared out at center for the construction of the Nextel pole is the location of the proposed GTE facility. RECEIVED Ayr;: 61197 uEvt. co/ ui- rcLI4IuN _T 3.) View of the existing 120 ft tower from the west at the far end of the Kingdom Hall parking lot, about 550 ft. Tower is at center to the right of the power lines. t; ' • t • j :} ,may:.j,✓ .r , `: • 4,34 _ ow* off! • 4.) Similar to above, this view is looking east but from the front edge of the Kingdom Hall property, or about 300 ft from the existing tower. The tower is directly above the stop sign. 1411 -�--- •d 5.) View of the existing tower from the track field of Hazen High School to the southeast. This is about 900 ft from the tower, but closer than any of the residences to the south or east. • • y 1."'"'.. 6.) View of the existing tower from 10th Street about one block west of Duvall Ave. The tower is at center, about 2100 ft away, sticking up just in front of the top of the hill in the background. s• Z. _(( y _ ; , I II _ - _� wr " 7.) View from a new residential development (NE 17th St.) looking south. The tower is a speck at the center of the photo and is about 3000 ft away. • .44 1 ti .. li • It Git - .1.1•011••••• _ . 8.) View from the intersection of NE 12th Street and Duvall Avenue looking to the southwest. The building across the intersection is the Kingdom Hall. Trees screen the residences to the west of Duvall. • . 11 / K • "F - • la 4 1 l . _ Alt 3 ='' *r. s , . --------- -, . .. ...v. ... .:4 rialli"lig.r4. . . a• • VIM 1 . �e I, ..•. f .. am, " . : *'v....r,4• e �•., /"` •.. - i• i .'. •......• 9.) View looking west from the high school athletic fields. The existing monopole is on the left. ID • • •• rt •• a• a I a •'•• _ ,.-'1. , • , ‘ . , .f. •- . ., f• r • ' ,11E- 4 . - r...,.... , , 4 ,••••4- .- . . .• • • r ....1 b. ,l 4 r; ; 1.1i l'ir.41t1, t,,1•. , • '• •I t.a • r.t • r... • ak. •• • 'lit .. -: .; • 4r4IP „. . •• • • . , " 41k .; l I.... . 1 , 10 110 L . +s i 4-±r- -4 1 kv-- . I"A. '- -,11::.- 1"•••—• ..::-. ..-. 1,41314 . . • . .., t• A .. 1110,- AILN".----..., 1 - . „ .. .if, . — • . , • -40.2.41 ........,..--.7rers"..„,„ ..„,„..,. - ' ' . ''.4,:-.-'---,-. 4••'-' -r• I.. .-'••-'-'1,;;;,,,r- * I-3 .._.'",=, . •... -Plerfie.,... • ` - • _-,. - -- „ -, • .411•10. .. .,' ,•_... I ..: • •- . .. •";*' ' ... . • -, •il.;..-.. • .. -- . •,4‘,. .;--: - . . - . .. ..• • ....• . . • . . . . 4..../.... .. ,, •;„„, .„, • -id . • 10.) View looking east from just east of the project area looking at Hazen High School. render the Leased Premises unsuitable for Tenant's continued use. g) Upon thirty (30) days written notice to Landlord, if it is determined that the Leased Premises or Landlord's Property is/are contaminated with Hazardous Substances, as defined in Paragraph 16, such that the presence of the contamination materially and adversely affects Tenant's ability to continue to operate its Communications Equipment. Upon termination, neither party shall have any further obligation to the other; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that if Tenant terminates this Agreement pursuant to Subparagraphs (c) or (d) more than ninety (90) days from the date Tenant exercises its Option, Tenant shall pay Landlord a lump sum payment equal to six (6) months' Rent. Tenant shall remove its Communications Equipment from the Leased Premises no later than One Hundred Eighty (180) days following the date of termination. Upon termination, Tenant agrees to restore the Leased Premises to its original condition, normal wear and tear excepted. 9. TAXES: Tenant shall pay annually within sixty (60) days of demand an amount equal to any increase in real estate taxes paid by Landlord but only to the extent any increase is attributable to improvements made by Tenant to the Leased Premises. Tenant shall not be responsible for any interest, penalty or late charges caused by Landlord's failure to pay in a timely manner. Tenant reserves the right, at its own cost, to contest the validity of any such increase attributable to Tenant's improvements on the Leased Premises. 10. SURVEY: A surveyed description of the Leased Premises shall be furnished by Tenant to Landlord at no cost either during the Option Period or subsequent to the Commencement Date. Such description shall be appended to this Agreement as Exhibit "A-1" and shall constitute the determinative description of the Leased Premises in lieu of any different description of the Leased Premises contained in Exhibit A. 11. NON-INTERFERENCE: Landlord will not grant a lease, license, or easement or transfer or convey any other interest in Landlord's Property upon which the Leased Premises are located or in any other property owned by Landlord contiguous to the Landlord's Property which would in any way adversely affect or interfere, in Tenant's reasonable but sole discretion, with the operation of the Communications Equipment. 12. FIXTURES: Notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, Landlord agrees that the Communications Equipment and any other improvements placed on the Leased Premises by the Tenant shall remain the personal property of the 05/19/97 WA0206 Hazen zi,`U 61997 5/14 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON . .. .� is M ,, �, •,- of Tenant. 19. INDEMNITY: Landlord and Tenant each indemnifies the other against and holds the other harmless from any and all costs (including reasonable attorneys fees) and claims of liability or loss which arise under this Agreement. This indemnity does not apply to any claims arising from the sole negligence or intentional misconduct of the indemnified party. 20. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT/SNDA: Landlord and Tenant agree, following the execution of this Agreement, to execute a short form of memorandum of this agreement suitable for recording in the State of Washington, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C". Tenant, at its sole expense, shall have the right to record the memorandum in the county where the Leased Premises are located. Landlord agrees to cooperate with Tenant in obtaining any executed subordination, non-disturbance and attornment agreement to the extent that such an agreement may be necessary. 21. MISCELLANEOUS: This Agreement and any attached Exhibits constitute the entire agreement between Landlord and Tenant. No prior written communication or oral representations shall be binding. It shall not be amended except in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties. The Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. Time is of the essence in this Agreement and each of its provisions. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If any provision is declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder shall not be affected thereby, and shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. The venue for any litigation hereunder shall be King County, Washington. Each party represents to the other that it has full right and authority to enter into this Agreement. The prevailing party in any litigation arising hereunder shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys fees and court costs, including appeals costs, if any. 22 Co-Location: Tenant shall construct its Communications Equipment on the Lease Premises to accommodate the placement of one additional antenna array on the tower, in addition to Tenant's own antenna array. Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that 05/19/97 WA0206 Hazen 8/14 _.. .-:.i:. .-:1.`.:. , ;i.- _ ..a i:fi: 4'- 'S v :S i'Yv6+a a,' J �l'C•'- 'KA'' Landlord may negotiate to locate an additional user on Tenant's Monopole, provided however, that such proposed additional user shall nor be allowed to locate on Tenant's Monopole without the mutual consent of both Landlord and Tenant. The party that negotiated with the proposed additional user shall provide the other party, for its review and approval, the plans and specifications for the proposed additional user's anntenna array and related equipment and the proposed agreement(s) between such parties relating to the use of the Property and Premises by the proposed additional user. Within thirty (30) days of the receipt of such information, the reviewing party shall consent or object to the proposed,additional user and the proposed agreement(s). The proposed additional user shall pay not less than the current market rate for colocation and the use of the Tenant's Monopole and the Property. Tenant shall be allowed to charge each additional user a one time fee of $20,000.00 as contribution to the Tenant for its startup costs of this installation and to colocate on Tenant's Monopole. Said $20,000.00 fee shall be for the sole account of the Tenant. 05/19/97 WA0206 Hazen 9/14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Lease as of the day and year first above written. "LANDLORD" ROBERT E. FRICKS • • By: Print Name: CAS Title: .t)it) Tax Identification/SSN Number: 1 .2--14-4-07/,-- DONNA C. FRICKS By: e Print Name:,�61jner., e Title: Tax Identification/SSN Number: 5 3S - - S c) 2 S "TENANT" GTE MOBILNET INCORPORATED By: 6' Print Name: Donald"M. Fye Y Title: AVP - Network Engineering and Construction 05/19/97 WA0206 Hazen 9/14 [If Landlord is an individual] STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF /Cln) ) Personally appeared before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State and County duly commissioned and qualified, Robert E. Fricks and Donna C. Fricks, with whom I am personally acquainted, and who acknowledged that (s)he executed the within instrument for the purposes therein contained. Witness my hand and seal of office this day of Pi, , 19 1 7 NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: 3 3 (NOTARIAL SEAL) = 7Ittfpflits s . +1NSP,y: egiA ..1 0 R .r [For GTE's nota • ation] {�, Lo o « STATE OF . Rom• i ) s., �j� •�I.. v4 .. COUNTY OF ........ • Personallya ear, before pp me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, Donald M. Fye, with whom I am personally acquainted, (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence), and who, upon oath, acknowledged themselves to be the AVP, Network Engineering and Construction of GTE Mobilnet Incorporated, a corporation, and that in such capacities they executed the foregoing instrument for the purpose therein contained, by signing the name of the corporation. • Witness my hand and seal of of ce this- day o , 191-. O _ ' ,� ifi� TARY PUBLIC rr °1� My � � % � Commission Expires: • 'i�/d�;.,���1�Qjb,= (NOTARIAL SEAL) 0. WA"``. • 05/19/97 WA0206 Hazen 10/14 Y '1/ovv F/Ze **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/13/97 14:07 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9705154 Amount: 53.20 08/13/97 14:07 Payment Method: CHECK Notation::#5506 JM CONSULT Init: LMN Project #: LUA97-103 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9081 Site Address: 1160 DUVALL AV NE Total Fees: 2,453.20 This Payment 53.20 Total ALL Pmts: 2,453.20 Balance: .00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000.345.81.00.0019 Variance Fees 50.00 000.05.519.90.42.1 Postage 3.20 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/06/97 13 : 39 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9704983 Amount: 2, 000 . 00 08/06/97 13 :35 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #25775 JM CONSUL Init : LN Project #: LUA97-103 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9081 Site Address : 1160 DUVALL AV NE Total Fees : 2, 453 .20 This Payment 2, 000 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2, 400 . 00 Balance: 53 .20 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 2, 000 . 00 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/06/97 13 :39 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9704984 Amount: 400 . 00 08/06/97 13 :35 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #25776 JM CONSUL Init: LN Project # : LUA97-103 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9081 Site Address : 1160 DUVALL AV NE Total Fees : 2, 453 .20 This Payment 400 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 2 , 400 . 00 Balance: 53 .20 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81. 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 200 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0019 Variance Fees 200 . 00