The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLUA97-106 • J I I I I L ` Z '''' O Z . LL LiJ CC CO • = H • O cc • - CO O z 'c Z . E E REMOVE 70' i EXISTING CELL PHONE SITE 0 0 cc_ MONOPOLE E W/ 120' MONOPOLE ANTENNA 0 Y ADD MONOPOLE (EXISTING CD / "" a 3 W/ ANTEN 1 STORY BLDG.) EXIST. POWER HANDHOLD W ID O0 CC PLATFORM BTS EQUIP. % a Oj J CO MAXIMUM S 71' 58' 26" W 201.81' \ LL CO ANTENNA a .. iiiiiiiiiiiiiii . iiiiiiiiiiii — _ C7 � ' HT. = 140' 1 • •. .. Z y Z ryj= N BOLLARD '/ '_ Z .y O • __ EXIST. GRAVEL _POWER ,• EXIST. 2" PVC, 3 #2 AWG & 1 #8 GND. N a !d 01 � �/ EXISTING ASPHALT UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICE • EXISTING TRAILER D IVEWAY I I TO SITE F "FINAL LOCATION / ACCESS THROUGH _ \ ... 1 ,,,,} , CHAIN LINK GATE '� A 7/30/97 ADD 140 MONOPOLE FENCE WIT GATE • s/oz/9] AS-BUILTS SET o STAIRS ADD GRE VINYL SLATS 10/18/9E PERMIT SET 0. STORY BLDG.) 5/05/90 ZONING SET m SAS FLUID POWER w 919 HOUSER WAY N. �i REMST B 9 OM [Ma v 00 PARKING 7 En z "°"./ RE In ��TELCO TO BLDG �� d a�,®^M do 6/5(96 NIC IN PPC < RA M io TELCO ROOM GAS EXISTING NATURAL i C I 1 8II'ti 1e5 /NWab Kernel cn \ • .111132“.=••••MO co II ,,i VERIFY EXACT• "'�.�'°' 0.,..,_,,.. >.�m..+. 4 140' LOCATION PRIOR N O 1 TE TO ANY DIGGING Z x 5— /--- — —5 EXISTING TRAILER 2% f TEMPORARY LOCATION 1 // / NOTE: MOVE TRAILER TO H I L PARKING TEMPORARY LOCATION ONLY - 7 AIS LONG AS NECESSARY TO / INSTALL NEW TOWER AND EXISTING ASPHALT SPR/NT SPE_CoTi9U�1! REMOVE EXISTING TOWER. DRIVEWAY I • scernc mewecame: ounoWs REROUTE UTILITIES AS REO'D leEI ew"c W'�'4HINGTON ssoa 200 — — — TO SERVICE ARY TRCILER IN I (206)602-2310 TEMPORARY LOCATION. N 71' 58' 26" E 231.23' 1 ZONING/PERMIT EXIST. TELEPHONE POLE I \ \c i ISITING TELCO. o JUNCTION PANEL NENT-008-07 NORTH RENTON SAS.FLUID POWER 919 MOUSER WAY N. RENTON,WA 98055 (TN SITE SITE NORTH Al SITE PLAN H `� 1• ]0.-0' ._ ' 790]-a1 09.09 7 Aug199]- CM m 97-902 7/30/97 Z r --- -_, --, - ... • . ).. „, ./ - sji-552:1 .3,45 '''''' 11 .i'• cl 3,,I.9r:! .,„—,-;,_1111?)-6'1.1i 17,6 MBE i-11,mu?I' EZ 1.,,,t2 r"•-ii.?;Ei... '_I 8: ' 'IV 4•1•7c,,,, .-e -• LLi I ;1.? !--'2--,---F-,-..i.-.;if-acia..,- 7.c x ,•0 • . - , , -z. _,. % -•-- . --4,.--- i._ 64"' —o 437. II, C.0 c g•-,r. O('' ‘% , laNr8i;:71,47:HgPF:e3RIST..1137,,E4; , -",c: 249-LA9W.; GENE COULO /, ' °A..: '• \A . , - 44* -,, /. ,,r, ke ,;____ 1:: 1 i 315, 'i, :\,2;71,,, E i 6, g t?../;---1.i g 4- 2q8 MI6 2 4-gi 5 b • / '''''-'-'‘: )E A C H iii3 A Rit,'', j ,;6 )-'• -\,\ S130773E19 / , , . t, -.„ i; . .. •• - --.,.. ,, 1 .0 \ „/., „ . \. , . \v 10) 1 i i ,,-.,-----;,, .' , \ '. \ , In „ ‘ • , /1 ,, II zee -",•YRACT 6 ' , 312\ 313 ' \\. , ..--_-_---..,--• : ,p \ ",' . '• r\- ...\'-ef,, .— \\ ' i. , ••:".- ,0 . ,.. . . ? ,•''' 011 0.1i''N' ,\ ,.\J),./..((/>;2"---- ,., ,. .,,,, 0 \ / .n.n,..i.,,,, ''''1.:1111'.:1.'''',:c..,:.,',,''...,.:/....:''''' ' 2 111 3,3•1323''=t—r'! " * ".. , ,, ,180' \ /\,\:--eq, '‘,1>/ • . ._. :.r. H)::::.'". 13..•,,e,i•6t?, o'7?-7''''')°: '::::::;'1'''''': ':'till- 0 4 '•:)*3 N, ::,,,',,,•:•4,f's,',,, 30, . N, -,-,."-"-',;„ ,j4.,'z' 4:r ' •, , A 7r.,. .'-n. ,;_.5_ii n :z,„„.0. . •sc`-'6 ,,;•:•' „•-•,, , ',`,K,,' ...• Gov):-AI '•, • trt - •• T- ,•e.,', •• 4,0 37.9.1)4V" , .. •". . •/< . .. . ••. • .•: : N 0 :'• •,. ,, . ,,.• 1,s .-..'•:.',,-'.. //' 17 23,Ac sli•P ,c0 ,..:' .. , ' -i. C. ,. 4:E. ..::'' •3-e APE, ci. ,..;: - ?-t.: E Q, , ,,,.., •• r ',.co-colf. 73 , 4,... r Q ' 4.„ . . .. • ,. \ CI ,k y.,0" .N.:,,,,- .f i `'X' '• ' • . , \-4„, „lc, re,s5,,/ ,...• ,::.,ii,\, / • .•'/ • ' ' . . • . • • — \ Cr ,,,,3 .•/ .4,',. •,• A 00. 'c; .•.. st 0365 .2.i:;"i,;;•k-,/ .•••.• 1 w " /171ral 'Ilif:1)4;-?if fll . 911•:,r 1 .,',.' . ,,,i,:, -c• " , :..,6 1. ..? • 8, . •• . 1 2 -,••.••• .r . c 6,---------- ;.------ r_Lt4 I -,,-,e, -----, _____,..., c a? c;e :$ .:0 I • !, ,,...,9 ....,,,i l' t,t, c, m 7. . ':•••;24.. , U ZOACres o_.s., -, ,ce7up,,,, 473. ..a. : s 0 in ., o •:---1, , 3 •-.f.'''. t- --r; ,, 12. 0 . ,...7, " __. . '' `;',•7"la t.:'-`-' - •. . ., - , .• X. ''.. .1>1 ' C. T... -. S .),. 13 •- ', < 44 22 Ac __._= 1 ‘3_..1 L5 •% ...------- • - r.r‘ %,..----. '•••, • 1., .. •'" ' Qi - 0800 c 1 ! o I,.0 • , . . . , r. s,j1:4,4 e,,g Ti 1 wc- 4',, . .. _. .) ,._:..:. . - .. . . . .. . ... . . -- ?., ki a 2 l'', 0 4 0 An \?. }-- A OMINISMATION 134.0.9 Z'; 7' z \ II :---- ., LEGEND ATLAS OF SEATTLE ----------------- L32 7 COPYRIGHTED&PUBLISHEO BY ======== no.. KROLL MAP COMPANY,INC.,SEATTLE =;,==.47,1,===,....... 1,14F-giS:Zys‘Eal.:+7044.7n.u ED n..,.. ...,,n., ,n,..,.. mosu .„ mmil Nt SCALE 3 INCH-MO FEET „ I I I I II,, I: : A , , • • . -I 1 I F I L. yI 13'-5' / > Z ▪ O �GPS UNIT BATH BRACKET II IN col 3 •� e, MOUNTED TO MONOPOLE I. 1( _ ly M FUTUREZ UJ i SURFACEUN. ii b PROPOSED 2 \ / C T o z 31 - CO▪ O o e PLAN - ANTENNA ORIENTATION E3 0Z aK , / 20'-0"(EXISTING) / •CC • G 0 0 a m Ro 0 CCZ ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO METAL I 'O` 0 W PIPING O 3'-0'MIN.SEPARATION ------------------ X X X X X X X \ V E Q 6%72"MAIL SZE \\\\\\\\r //�� COAZIMUTH-2w' y) W a 3 ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO METAL X ce a) O cc PIPING O S-0'MIN.SEPARATION —mum W 6'472'MAX.SZE IXtiNC iFNCE(T1P.) 1 01 BUILDING o. � Q j W AZIMUTH-120' A00 GREEN Wm SIATS.• ' TELCO UNE X 1 LL FUTURE TYP =_ \\ ^ 0 I. ....... \ Z_ C��N Z coi O W a o) kg 0 ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO METAL .4 IV 0. CC y O X PIPING O V-0"MIN.SEPARATION , 6%72'MAX.SZE / k' AZIMUTH-0 N _ -•NEW MONOPOLE W/ PLATFORM PLAN 4 _ ANTENNA Pu H X p MAX.ANTENNAA MT.i.-Iw' RELOCATE ANTENNAS TO I. NEW MONOPOLE o o EXIST.PLATFORM x X GRAM.TARO 7/30/97 NEW 140'MONOPOLE /1 ANTENNA SUPPORT MONOPOLE TO NEW ARRAY. HOVE' 0!!1:' RELOCATE TO NEW MONOPOLE � ! r i ,.. g TO NEW MONOPOLE. x i \ 5/02/97 AS-BUILTE SET '^+1"il' A. 10 16 9E PERMIT SET RELOCATE GPS - -- 5/05/96 ZONING SET ANTENNA TO _ REMOVE EXISTING 70'MONOPOLE X ^ NEW MONOPOLE 00T oaaePmv ROW J.J.M. �. X o m/ R.C.E. �i�n J.A.L. W6/5/96 L'll' X \O' I o®n R.AA. _ IIIII Rohl-Parr 8/Associates F w • X am Mwm 23 w11111 IST, \a LL Uri EOUIP. - REMOVE STEEL IXIST. — i..C MONOPOLE. REUSE PPC ACCA _ a.mANTENNAS AND — \ PLATFORM ON NEW MONOPOLE. EXISTING 6'-0'GATE GR GR PRC..PWR iiiii SPRINT SPECTRUM 1:io At ENGINEERING OPERATIONS PCS MINICELL Mil EXIST.BOLLARD—\\\< EXISTINGE NG T1000 NE.IJRO PLACE-SUITE 200 CABINETS CONCRETE BELLEINE WISHINGTON 98004 \ • (113)602-2310 11111 iiiii EXIST.6'-0' / Al-3 _ - / HIGH CHAIN \ X X X X X X X X ., ZONING/PERMIT UNK FENCE W F iiiii BARBED WRTRANDS E A 11' COAXIAL CABLE \ ADD VINYL SLATS I PORT 2 0 \ II FROM BASE RENT-006-07 • I��K T � ON �, .� \ NORTFLU ID H POWER 919 GRADE `i. D10 SER WAY N. .?FilCI ::., TII- ,', SITE DETAIL ® u�a,ma POLE X-2`-] V.J NO SCALE EAST EGG/ATION FOUNDATION NORTH ELEVATION A ��p�1� ELEVATIONS NORTH &LDETAILSS A 2 `A2J 1 -B o' • 7902-02 0991 7 A99 1997 n um. 97-902 7/30/97 1 I I I r . , :so ,,.,: ' • • i -•-"Jg," t, ,;,37Aio.' :.,:::::: . :L_ ji, 1, -,:, d- •-, „. SZOMEE_ . ...... ::: 1 '------ .. . • 11 10 . _ ...,., ,.., 4, ,, ka r, •,, . 92 I N- N C ... .V0.•4,.• 1 ‘---• ri•....:•." I ''''• I ` ;::'••••• I --- .••....: 0[0* /,' ..•.17-''-'---'.'.t,I''-..r:41 Y•• ! • ',...• • ..0.,.T .'..,. , . . :: 0 • ...":. ___,...—...---:,,....:. " .., ' ', ,„,„,.„„...:;5,,,,,:,..,i'' •• Ter::i,„ 00, t:, \.,--• ---5° ' ,1.'.••' ''''' 'i 1''.4 ,i ,. PAC°'''. ....":.0 _c 0 50. •,,., ..,IA 0 o•c,,,,,0„,.. rp.U, - *.17 " "o0 , E.' 1,I' ' it2•04...T(! i -18 0\:\ r , I:. o ,.----- ....`"07,, .s.'"•.,,,,, .... g..:.'"•......\%, '. ,j0EN GArl 1 I •• 0° 'i 1 ,,,, 0 ':...?.....:':::::':•: -..'' 1'' ' ) ''''(A/2)'> '',' '<9'1 .''. &I- • $.1 _.j... 121a,erij.;''' '-.74.,, \\, ,,/ crif;:-'''-'15); '1".3`:4‘'1,J z:s-;.,:.,),,,J,..e7i,, .:'..;.:::::... --;•:;,,—. ::: •• I. 41, I ' , ' • ��,1,\\\ \\ S�!rU'J \u u 7V-1 '-m '°101- Lb \An ` 00 4.1 • 't. ., # •`1` `4 , ; --.... 11111!1'` - Y .. i yti`;., . ir: . 1. • 1t . 1 S�J Ch 9 r'S'74d � ' S �N ''•�� '-m, '10 - Lb Vfl .4It sip. I '; i a t v. • *..,_j it il) „ . a.: i1 1 << y w 1 / 1i wA9i ; tot,, cU,\ Loon_ ,,L, Fac'v' 5 it d GE Capital ModularSpace 800 523-7918 • - .//t. loobl /� J ; a r�J ` Otii LA" - toksR C,u,A • P : ►, r FAcr,U C 50 -1 fc 45 S ITc { ' , r cI i �: ' ri _. l air i s,‘ • . 1 1, 1111••if `\j . ,14, i11111:11111s>> \�s to wl ��u{Fe, . J * *..w L Q , 4.1.-,- .L, 1., 4141.1 ''''s - „i' / ,� T., . f - .} S ss _Ls_Lsko 9prz.7d- fir•m vrot-u.win 1 � �_ d t 'ca . t •• CU-A \� LEA- F Srt 517,46- tj Fars F2vr- Rp-t . I. I 1.: . , ..41V r r -- .1 imik. AMIE -• gni 1.1 e • ; •.s3. 73ik- • ?•.4. ;.•I• 4111;1111.14" 9i — 14(0 r c-U V (E Jt S CIE Fac t.r(4& (A E.53T F n-‘ t •.4..,', i • ••• .. • , i I ; . f . ' . 'I . ', 'i.,' ;: ;• r ...,1 '' / l Pr ' 1 i . ' '.• '':* % ..fr'',.; .4 to . , . . , , - .,, • . - . :IS , le . . , . 'iateil. ;; .. ,„ . 4 '• .`• , ., •• •.', ' , -Rover —itak,:. ,,,.. . ,. 1,1•4k „ ,• "..:: ::".. to '10-1).°': ,,,:e •'' • 4 ' .' . ,' . , ,,,,,,, *, ': ,, 4°. 0 .:.4, W . . : ', • .: . 't• ..4%!!‘1,..:0'i!, 0 ',Al , ' :1 '4 •• ''', • • • ; -0 ° ,0., • ' ' 1 ' it.:.,,,, t,..--1-4',4 • ' ': '.',. , , ,, '. ,,'.' • ,a A.. . ,. , ',. ... ,-.: . • .sv„ , ;:, . • •, • 4 - ' ° '; l'.iii‘ ';1:'* I':' • ' ° ' ( .• , !, ...;,' '• i ' LUA 9l - 1ploCU-A Ulm iTE I/ Kl5fl .0& Wia Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation • 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O.Box 330310 Secretary of Transportation • Seattle,WA 98133-9710 (206)440-4000 DATE: October 3, 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNINGCITY OF RENTON TO: Peter Rosen OCI 3 1997 City of Renton, Project Manage • r 200 Mill Avenue South _ _ ,�;E Renton WA 98055 Subject: SR 405 MP 5.00 CS 1744 Determination of Nonsignificance-Sprint Monopole on Houser-Instillation 140 foot telecommunications monopole & replace a 70 foot monopole File No.LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF FROM: Robert A. Jos phson,PE, Manager of Planning &Local Coordination Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North, MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project,which is located 919 Houser Way North. Our response is below: We have reviewed this subject document and have no comments. The Project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions, please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name •, CIT'z OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • October 2, 1997 • Mr.Tom Paine Sprint Spectrum 11000 NE 33rd Place, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: . Sprint Monopole on Houser Project No. LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF Dear Mr. Paine: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance for the above-referenced project. • No appeals were filed. The applicant must comply with all Conditions of the Conditional Use Permit Approval prior to issuance of any permits.: If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 235-2719. For the Environmental Review Committee, Peter Rosen Project Manager • • cc: Mr. Ronald Anderson/Owner • FINAi noC . 200 Mill Avenue South•- Renton,-Washington 98055 FILE No. 718 10/02 '97 08:54 Ip.QTV SEATTLE OFFICE 425 241 f99 PAGE 2 ' print Sprint PCS- stank.Engineering Teleph:ii':1:b G02 21:100 and Network Operations I':t ::?06 Yd1;!:!35I1 11000 NI?33n1 I'I. ;i.Iite 31x1 I4Ilat'ih? u' hinl�,Inn 91lrt.ii September 15, 1997 DEVELOPM R PLANNING Mr. Peter Rosen, Senior Planner City of Renton OCT Q 2 i997 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Municipal Building a 4"•'1 I VED 200 Mill Avenue South. Renton, Washington 98055 RE: L;UA-97-106 Administrative Conditional Use Permit Conditions Dear Mr. Rosen: Enclosed please find the FAA documentation requested as a condition of the approval of the Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Sprint Monopole on Houser. Conditions: I. The applicant shall provide evidence Of FAA approval of the height of the monopole, prior to the issuance of the building permits. The enclosed FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration allows for 145' at this site. The proposed monopole will have a total building height of 140'. 2. If the FAA requires lighting, or marking of the monopole, the applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance. The enclosed FAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration indicates that the proposed monopole is not identified as an obstruction under any standard of FAR, Part 77, Subpart C. Obstruction marking and lighting are not necessary. If you have any questions regarding this site, please feel free to give me a call at 425.602.2310. • Sincerely, Tom Paine Property Specialist Sprint PCS FILE No. 718 10/02 '97 08:54 ID:STV SEATTLE OFFICE 425 241 0899 PAGE 3 r. r . 0 Notice of Proposed Aeronautical_ Study Number U.a.°aprtment r r Trepartetton Construction or Alteration 9 ? 4NMQR7flE • Fadrrl Avl.ltet. 1..Nature of Propooal 2. Com_plete Descn_ption of Structure A.Type B. Clad■ C.work Schedule out.. Plena.describe on a separate shoat of paper If necessary,the New Construction 1=1Pamienent Beglnnlnp After FAA approval proposed construction or alteration. ®Alteration • 0 Temporary(Duration End Within 6 Iipnthg A. For proposals involving transmitting stations,include months) effective radiated power(ERP1 and assigned frequency of all proposed or Modlfled transmitters on the structure. (If not •IfAlteration,provide previous FAA Aeroneuu utA cal 6tN.ump.r.if available: 96-ANDS-0806_OE known.give frequency band and maximum ERP). 3A. Narak address.add telephone number of individual'oonytany,corporation.etc. B. For proposals involving P sktg the oonattucdon or atreration.(Number,Street,City.State.and.Zip Code) p c rW overhead wire,transmission the resa, Stave Bennett etc.,Include the size and the configuration of the wires and WizelessCo L.P. dba Sprint PCS their supporting structure®_ 11000 NE 33rd Placa C. For as proposal..Include site orientation,dlmenisione,and Suite 200 (Sited, RENT-006-04) construction material of the proposed or altered structure. Bellevue, WA 98004 206 D. Optional-Describe the type of obstruction marking and ) 60Z-2304 lighting system desired for your structure-The FAA will Area Code Telephone Number recommend appropriate marking and lighting for the 3B.Nam■,address and tale blotto number o structure in accordance with the standards of Advisory above. p proponent a representativ■,if different than 3A. Circular AC 70f74B0-1.An FAA marking and lighting recommendation will reflect the minimum acceptable level of Jaaas G. Walters consplctiity necessary to warn pilots of the presence of an Airsp*os Safety Analysis Corporation object.However,the FAA under certain circumstance.,will Two Crown Cantor not object to the use of a system(such as a medium 1745 Phoenix Boulevard, Suits 120 intensity flashing white light system or a dual lighting Atlanta, Georgia 30349 system)other than the recommended standard. ( 0 77. 994-1557 7 _ (Sea g t=t=aC g 2dAr2t) Area Code Telephone Number -ii T Effi 4. Location Of Structure i 6. Height and ova toll (to nearest foot) A.Coordinates Ir.tv.baler■r oomph.Id brow) 8.Nernst City or Town and C.Naroet puWio or military airport. A.Elevation of site.bowl meanSista Letitiao e I ' T " Renton heliport.fllghtprk.or saaplana bass Loa I■v■1. 47 30 03.10 Washington Renton Municipal 33' Longitude to Ir • ` ill-Distance to 49 (1)•D■tanu from auuctur■to nearest B.Height of atructuis including all 122 11 53.20 point of nearest►unwry appurtsn.nc.e and lighting above p0.Sourus of eoordin.tu information for ham 4A. In 0.76ground or wets_ above. City NM 14$' ®USCG 7.6' r i pthY (2).Oirectial 10 48 (ZI.Oirsetion from structure to airport G.Overall height above moon ass Quad ChartSurvey u Specify laudlaud(A $B) tllcsts tha rsiwonoe datum of the corirdnnetee.II finoWn, In City 268.72" True Bearing 178' NAD 77 ❑Z NAD 83 �'r 4E.Describe,on a separate sheet of paper,the location of the site with respect to highways. streets,airports, spicily prominent terrain features,existing structures,etc. Attach a copy of a U.S.Geological Survey quadrangle map 7.6 minute series or equivelentt showing the construction site.If available,attach a copy of a documented alto — - surve with the■urve or's certification. AA.LRE TO PROVIDE ALL REQUESTED INFORIIaA ION MAY DELAY R1OCESSING OF YOUR NOTICE loot.Is required by Pat 77 of the Fsierel Aviation Regulations 114 C.F.R.Part 77)p..auent to Section 1101 of the Faders!Aviation Act of 1968,as amended(49 U.S.C.app.! 15011. 'loon who knowingly and willfully violate the Notice requir.m.nta of Part 77 we subject to a civil penalty of a 1.000 psi day until the notice I.received,purauanl to Section 001(.1 of the adored Aviation Ant of 11369.a.emended 14p u.8.C.app i 14711141 as wag as the fine(crirrJnel penalty)of not mono than a600 for the first often..end not more than.2.000 for hil?Iequant offanasa.ptuyuant to Ssction @oiIa1 of .fvtlan Liulailon Aot of 10¢8.e■.mended({8 U.S.C. .PD i 1474(.}!- HEREBY CERTIFY that al .of t a above tatements made by ma ore true,complete. and correct to the beet of my knowledge. In addition. ■to obatruct(on mar � r'Iglu t�etruptur�in2aggp( a.�wgh esta hoc_rnerkinq 8t It truht rider es r ggae isle Typed or Printed-Name and Title of Person Filing Notice Sign �/ / 07/14/97 Steve Bennett, Property Specialist % +.i'' fir! ' 'OR FAA USE ONLY FAA will either return this form or issue a separatd acknowledgement. 3 be Proposal: • de plrnrtW Nutkuof caneeunlon.FAA Form 74ao.2,is required any time the project i■abandoned,or — 2 a Doss not require•notice to PAA At Nast 41I bass boon the stet of construction. fig I.net 14•nsInee r an obetruceen..alp any atrderrl of FM,Pet 77. Dimino.five rK�=t Subpart C.but would not be a herd to navigation. L--I days the the can.truotion��!!�f/y rta Brut 1Qh.ipht- 1 1 le Identified a■on obetructl.n under the stand This d.tpminetlon.apse.on i7 ! �—� t� Ede or FM,paw 77, unions: Id Subpart C.but weird net be a rteard up navigation. etlfMded,rwirud w termin.ted by the Oohing attic.; tihaUd d obstruction a corked IIOMed tau[M �b) construction permit M.ct to the ie ihafCC G oily of the'WWII Commtm,ciions Commiolon IFCCI and an application before the •aphelion dole.in such e•esa tt.d.t.nmalsllon■.p... on to dote prescribed by the FCC►a completion of mnetruction.or on the dote the FCC denies th..pli Mt/peaty CLwlr 70114 e0-1.Chapter* NOT[:A.q.,eet net■ulan.i.n of 1M•fiectiv•paned of thin dei•rmiMtion na.t b.postmarked or d■liv.r.d to the tS dive prior to trw..pire.ien den•. obstn s1Ien mrklno.rid Ilehtlrp or.not necessary. If the strum,.w twbOei to the Dwaine authority of the FCC,•copy of Uri■determination will b.e.nt to trim agency. 'mark, tUe.avow eoortllMlr far any 1ldure 0 • e ' o r r a AD 83 Coordinates eorre•ponainu with tin FAA) Latitu 4. Lon itudeJr !II rued'In shire ,� Date Avock FAA FORM 7460-1 (t•®sl I - ..................................................................................:.:................ 01.1 :' ;F'RENTON' > >»>` €»> > > > >» < ` < `>>'>> '>>> > >>><»> >` .:::.............. .::::::::::::::.:..:::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:::::::.:::::: :::.::::::. ::>;:<:::>::»>::>::::>::>::>::::»;<:<:::>:<:::>::<:<::::::;:::::<:;<::>:>;:::I:::>::EM<»:«::<:::>:::<::::>:::::<:CIJRR.ENT ..LA IIVG D . .... .... . , NN O .OFS ERVICE BY:MAILIN :`« '`` > `:' '` `€i < ° <>> `>> '<` ` << >><` : On the 166 day of ' ,eP Te•kINber' , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United . States, a sealed envelope containing . l e poir-C awl t 1ec tsto'v, . • documents. This information was sent to: • . Name Representing ' Palvve. Srrwvit SpeG�hLw 120 h alct AVtkettS6Y1 . • • • • • • (Signature of Sender) Sitj4..ia k- • St-ems\ . STATE OF WASHINGTON • ) . - ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) // • I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �l"ii4 K. 5e6� - .. . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the... use .'and 'purposes mentioned in the instrument. C. . Dated: q/i o f g q ihxl . zGl./Z ..... .,,,,,` Notary Public' and for th tate of Wash ngt5 tt-1i v jb ; ., Notary (Print) MARGARET."J.'011 " ` 1 . My appointment expires: coMKAIS.SION EXPIRES.6'/9/98 • ' NProject Name: . rtn% _ lfloviopole ov% i"'busev- Project Number: LUA 11 - lolo, GU-A gC NOTARY.DOC ' .. REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works 8c DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW& ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION REPORT DATE: September 9, 1997 Project Name: Sprint Monopole on Houser Applicant: Sprint Spectrum, do Tom Paine Owner: Ronald Anderson File Number. LUA-97-106, CU-A, ECF Project Manager. Peter Rosen Project Description: The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review in order to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication system. Project Location: 919 Houser Way North Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: N/A Site Area: 42,400 s.f. Total Building Area SF: N/A Project area - 1,000 s.f. .'3 N'3AV A3M31NON I Ii--_ _fO .3/ 7 -1 �i V1 �e c 4_1 ;'F, _ a1�VH I I N Ct o$oN1aa • .1 p 'I H 1. i Li. T N N' 'I reRstA � ig �,�,; wa, J N d . WAY ,I.,:.:, .veac��,5:"�: V IIr O O �oU _!yM1 E^ I' ot, I L E .Y •,•M, • '"SEW? }. ', o 0,: pro :Y•' cd�c ^ � N I . N ' I - 8 _ E --;-. ,1 `"\ GAR � s 1 V f Project Location Map ;»"'' �\ — —-- i 1 CURPRT.DOC bity of Renton P/B✓PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit 8 ironmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF 1. ' Report of September 9, 1997 Page 2 of 11 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks to replace an existing 70 foot monopole with a 140 foot monopole at the existing wireless PCS facility on the SAS Fluid Power Company property. An antenna platform would be mounted at the top of the monopole. The platform has three sides; facing north, southeast, and southwest. Each platform face would have four antennas. The overall height to the top of the antennas would be 140 feet. Five self-contained equipment cabinets would be located near the base of the monopole. Each cabinet is 6 feet tall and 30 inches square. The total land area devoted to the PCS base station is 1,000 square feet. An existing trailer located just south of the proposed facility would be temporarily relocated for the construction/installation of the proposed facility. The applicant requests a waiver from the landscape requirements, stating that existing natural and built features provide adequate screening of the site. A slatted chain link fence is proposed on the south and east sides of the base station. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21 C.240, the following project environmental review-addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The total site area is presently covered with impervious surfaces. The only soil disturbance would occur for grading approximately 100 cubic yards for the cement footing for the monopole structure. The applicant would be required to install and maintain temporary erosion control measures during the construction phase of the project. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (2) Air Impacts: Air quality impacts would be limited to the fugitive dust during the construction phase of the project and exhaust fumes from construction equipment. Construction of this project would occur in a very limited time frame. Fugitive dust will be controlled through compliance with the methods required by the City, such as sprinkling the site and the use of erosion control measures. Exhaust from construction equipment is already controlled by state and federal standards. The completed project would have no emissions. Mitigation Measures: None required. CURPRT.DOC , City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF ' Report of September 9, 1997 Page 3 of 11 Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts: The proposed facility would not generate additional stormwater runoff because the site is presently covered with impervious surfacing. A Temporary Erosion Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) would be mitigate potential runoff impacts during construction. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (4) Environmental Health Impacts: PCS telecommunication facilities consist of computerized radio equipment. The proposed facility would transmit radio signals in the 1850-1970 Megahertz range and operate at a very low power level (less than 200 watts). PCS facilities are regulated by the FCC. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 states that if a PCS facility meets the technical emission standards set by the FCC, it is presumed safe and a local jurisdiction does not have authority to regulate based on radio frequency emissions. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. XX Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and Appeal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required to address specific impacts which are not already addressed by City Code requirements. CURPRT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER _ LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF ' Report of September 9, 1997 Page 4 of 11 Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager The applicant does not furnish any information as to the elevation of the base of the tower. The tower manufacturer provided information that the base would be at 33'. If the ground elevation is in fact 33', the altitude of the monopole above sea level would be 173 feet. The Airport Horizontal Surface is at an altitude of 179'. If the tower's top has an altitude exceeding 179' above sea level, it should not be constructed. A review of the proposal by the FAA prior to permit issuance is requested. Construction Services Building permit is required. Plan Review A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required with a building permit. CURPRT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& rronmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF ' Report of September 9, 1997 Page 5 of 11 PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION -REPORT& DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action x Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Special Permit for Grade&Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: _Exhibit No. 1: Yellow-file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. 1, Vicinity Map (Received August 8, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. 2, Enlarged Site Plan (Received August 8, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. 3, Elevations& Details (Received August 8, 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. 4, Monopole Construction Details (Received August 8, 1997). Exhibit No. 6: Drawing No. 5, Platform Construction Details (Received August 8, 1997). C. Project Description/Background: The applicant seeks an administrative conditional use permit to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication system. The modified support structure is necessary to provide an adequate height to provide coverage to a service area that includes the immediate Renton area and nearby section of 1-405. The applicant has met the submittal requirements of the City's Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance. The application includes a map of the service area, photo simulations to demonstrate how the antenna and tower will be viewed from the surrounding area, and a map of the potential view area. The applicant has also submitted a copy of the lease agreement with the land owner that states that the tenant agrees to allow for potential collocation of additional PCS facilities and an agreement to remove the PCS facility after the use is discontinued. CURPRT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& fronmental Review.Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSE R _ _ __ LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF • Report of September 9, 1997 Page 6 of 11 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & DECISION Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now makes and enters the following: G. Findings 1) CONSISTENCY WITH CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA • Section 4-31-36 fists 11 criteria that the Hearing Examiner or Zoning Administrators are asked to consider, along with all other relevant information, in making a decision on.a Conditional Use application. These include the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ZONING CODE& OTHER ORDINANCES: The proposed use shall be compatible with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standard of the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and any other plan, program, map or ordinance of the City of Renton. (1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ITS ELEMENTS AND POLICIES The proposed communication facility is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies. Policy U-100: Require that the siting and.location of telecommunications facilities be accomplished in.a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The proposal site is located in the Employment Area-Industrial Comprehensive Plan designation and the Heavy Industrial (IH) zone and surrounded by industrial land uses. There are no residential land uses in the immediate area of the subject property. The site is well-screened by existing buildings and vegetation. The siting and location minimizes adverse visual and environmental impacts. Policy U-101: Require that cellular communication structures be sensitively sited and designed to diminish aesthetic impacts, and be collocated on existing structures and towers wherever possible and practical. The proposal would modify an existing PCS site, thereby reducing the demand and proliferation of additional PCS sites. The siting in a heavy industrial area reduces aesthetic impacts. The proposed facility has been designed to promote collocation for future PCS service providers. (2) ZONING CODE The project site is zoned Heavy Industrial (IH). The Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance (WCF) allows monopole facilities 60 feet or greater in height to be located within industrial zones with approval of an administrative conditional use permit. The IH zone has a 15 foot front/street setback requirement and no required rear or side yard setback requirement. There is no height limit specified in the IH zone. The WCF ordinance allows for a maximum height of 150 feet where no height limit is specified by the zoning designation. (3) WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES (CHAPTER 38) The proposal meets the development standards specified for Monopole II facilities, (defined as monopoles 60 feet or greater in height), except for the landscape requirements. The code requires a minimum 15 foot wide sight-obscuring landscape buffer around accessory equipment facilities or equipment cabinets. The applicant has requested a waiver from this code requirement. The code allows the Administrator or his/her designee to modify this provision for individual cases provided that the she/he CURPRT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER _ _ LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF Report of September 9, 1997 Page 7 of 11 finds a special individual reason that there are practical difficulties making the strict letter of this Chapter impractical and that such modification complies with the following criteria: 9. Will meet the objectives and safety, function, environmental protection and maintainability intended by the requirements of this Chapter, based upon sound engineering judgment. 2. Will not be injurious to other property(s)in the vicinity. The objective of the landscape requirements is to screen the accessory equipment facilities from view. The applicant requests a waiver claiming that existing natural and built features provide adequate screening of the equipment cabinets and the site. The proposed facility would be located in a 44 foot wide corridor between two existing buildings. These 1-story buildings would screen the view of the equipment cabinets(6 foot in height) from views from the north and south. The facility would be screened from the west by an existing blackberry-covered fence. The only view into the site would be looking into the narrow corridor between buildings, from the east from Houser Way. The equipment cabinets would be screened from this direction by a proposed slatted chain link fence. Section 4-38-13 of the WCF ordinance lists additional criteria for PCS facilities. The criteria address visual impacts, noise levels, fencing, lighting, advertising, and building standards. The proposal complies with the criteria of this code section with the exception of screening the equipment cabinets which is discussed above. The criteria state that towers should not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA. The existing 70 foot tall monopole on the site is lighted. If the FAA requires lighting, the applicant should be required to maintain the markers and/or lighting. B. COMMUNITY NEED: There shall be a community need for the proposed use at the proposed location. In the determination of community need, the Hearing Examiner shall consider the following factors, among all other relevant information: (1) The proposed location shall not result in either the detrimental over concentration of a particular use within the City or within the immediate area of the proposed use. The proposal to replace an existing 70 tall monopole with a 140 foot tall monopole is requested to improve necessary radio coverage to the service area. The modification of the existing monopole would substitute for the need for new PCS sites and thereby would prevent proliferation and potential over-concentration of the facilities. The applicant has designed the facility and agreed in the lease to allow for collocation of other PCS providers, which may also assist in reducing the number of new towers needed by other PCS providers moving into this area. (2) That the proposed location is suited for the proposed use. The proposed site location is well suited for the proposed use. The site has an existing PCS monopole and there is an existing 120 foot tall cell phone monopole abutting just east of the project site. The site is surrounded by industrial uses and a large area of industrial zoning. PCS facilities do not create adverse impacts that would conflict with industrial uses in the area. The proposal would not impact residential areas. The proposed location and expansion of the existing facility would allow the applicant to complete it's communication grid in the area so users of their service will not loose the signal. CURPRT.DOC City 9f Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER _ LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF Report of September 9, 1997 Page 8 of 11 C. EFFECT ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES: The • aproposed o ntproperty.use e at the proposed location shall not result in substantial or undue adverse effects The following site requirements shall be required: (1) Lot Coverage: Lot coverage shall conform to the requirements of zone in which the proposed use is to be located. The IH zone does not have a standard for maximum lot coverage. The total land area devoted to the PCS facility is approximately 1,000 square feet, which would have little affect on site lot coverage. (2) Yards: Yards shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Additions to the structure shall not be allowed in any required yard. The only setback required in the IH zone is a minimum 15 foot front/street setback requirement. The proposed facility would be located approximately 165 feet back from Houser Way North. (3) Height: Building and structure heights shall conform to the requirements of the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. Spires, belltowers, public utility antennas or similar structure may exceed the height requirement upon approval of a variance. Building heights should be related to surrounding used in order to allow optimal sunlight and ventilation, and minimal obstruction of views from adjacent structures. The applicant is proposing to replace an existing 70 foot.tall monopole with a 140 foot tall monopole. The IH .zone has no maximum height standard. The Wireless Communications Facilities ordinance allows for a maximum height of 150 feet, unless otherwise limited by height limits of the applicable zoning. The site is located in the Airport Horizontal Surface area with an altitude of 179 feet. The maximum height of the tower should not exceed 179 feet above sea level in order to comply with Airport Zoning. The base ground elevation is estimated at 33 feet. The applicant has limited the overall height of the PCS facility to 140 feet (173 feet above sea level) in order to meet height limitations associated with the Airport Zoning. D. COMPATIBILITY: The proposed use shall be compatible with the residential scale and character of the neighborhood. (Ord. 3599, 1-11-82) The proposed PCS facility is located in the Heavy Industrial (IH)zone and is surrounded by industrial uses. PCS facilities do not create noise, traffic, or environmental impacts that would conflict with existing industrial uses in the area. The closest residential zone is across 1-405, approximately 1/2 mile from the site. The freeway and topography limit views from this area. The monopole would not be visible from residential areas and therefore it does not raise issues of scale or character compatibility with residential uses. E. PARKING: Parking under the building structure should be encouraged. Lot coverage maybe increased to as much as seventy-five percent (75%) of the lot coverage requirement of the zone, in which the proposed use is located, if all parking is provided underground or within the structure. (Ord. 3903, 4-22-85) The proposal would require limited need to access the facility periodically to maintain the equipment. Parking is already available on the site and no additional parking is required for this facility. CURPRT.DOC City of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF Report of September 9, 1997 Page 9 of 11 F. TRAFFIC: Traffic and circulation patterns of vehicles and pedestrians relating to the proposed use and surrounding area shall be reviewed for potential effects on, and to ensure safe movement in the surrounding area. No new traffic will be generated by the proposed PCS tower except for the periodic maintenance visits. The existing roadways and circulation pattern will accept the anticipated vehicle use of this site. G. NOISE, GLARE: Potential noise, light and glare impacts shall be evaluated based on the location of the proposed use on the lot andthe location of on-site parking areas, outdoor recreational areas and refuse storage areas. The proposed facility would only generate noise from fans and/or heat exchanging equipment mounted inside the equipment cabinets. The fan noise is equivalent to the noise of a domestic fan and therefore would not adversely impact surrounding properties. H. LANDSCAPING: Landscaping shall be provided in all areas not occupied by building or paving. The Hearing Examiner may require additional landscaping to buffer adjacent properties from potentially adverse effects of the proposed use. The proposed facility (equipment cabinets) are effectively screened by existing buildings to the north and south and a fence covered with blackberries on the west. The applicant has requested a waiver from landscape requirements and is providing slatted chain link fencing to screen the facility. In the case of the subject proposal, landscaping is not necessary to buffer adjacent properties. L ACCESSORY USES: Accessory uses to conditional uses such as day schools, auditoriums used for social and sport activities, health centers, convents, preschool facilities, convalescent homes and others of a similar nature shall be considered to be separate uses and shall be subject to the provisions of the use district in which they are located. N/A J. CONVERSION: No existing building or structure shall be converted to a conditional use unless such building or structure complies, or is brought into compliance, with the provisions of this Chapter. N/A K. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed use and location shall be adequately served by and not impose an undue burden on any public improvements, facilities, utilities, and services. Approval of a conditional use permit may be conditional upon the provision and/or guarantee by the applicant of necessary public improvements, facilities, utilities, and/or services. The proposal would only require electrical service which is presently available on the site. No other services will be required. The facility would be inaccessible to the public and contains alarms and monitoring equipment. There are no employees associated with the project. There would be no increased need for public services. 2) Request: The Applicant, Sprint Spectrum, has requested approval for Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a 140 foot tall monopole with 12 antennas for Personal Communication Systems. 3) Administrative Conditional Use: The applicant's administrative conditional use application complies with the requirements for information for a conditional use permit. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 6. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area-Industrial (EAI). 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Heavy Industrial (IH)zone. CURPRT.DOC City pf Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF Report of September 9, 1997 Page 10 of 11 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: industrial; East: 1-405; South: industrial; and West: railroad, Boeing. H. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area-Industrial; and the Zoning designation of Heavy Industrial. 3) The proposal complies with the.Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance. 4) The request to waive landscape requirements is approved because the proposed equipment cabinets would be effectively screened by existing buildings, vegetation and the proposed slatted chain link fencing. I. Decision The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Sprint Monopole on Houser, File No. LUA-97-106, CU-A, . ECF, is approved,subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall provide evidence of FAA approval of the height of the monopole, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. If the FAA requires lighting, or marking of the monopole, the applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance. SIGNATURES: es C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator approval date Michael D. attermann,Zoning Administrator approval date TRANSMITTED this 9th day of September, 1997 to the applicant and owner: Ronald Anderson 919 Houser Way North Renton, WA 98055 Tom Paine Sprint Spectrum 11000 NE 33rd Place, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98004 TRANSMITTED this 9th day of September, 1997 to the following: Larry Melding,Building Official Art Larson,Fire Prevention Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal CURPRT.DOC , City pf Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Conditional Use Permit& ronmental Review Staff Report SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER LUA-97-106, CU-A,ECF Report of September 9, 1997 Page 11 of 11 ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 29, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required.$75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. CURPRT.DOC CURRENT>PLANNIN AFFIDAVIT''......................................................: EI N < »B :<»>::::::::::::::::>:::::::::::<>:>:»::»:»»>::>::>:>::::::::>:»»»»»> • ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ On the 10+:5 day of Sep'V' A:1'er-, , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing TEI2c. detevvv‘w+ahav documents. This information was sent to: Name Representing Department of Ecology Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power (Signature of Sender) '. V-• 5e .ce- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) / I I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatD24 . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. �.'': •Dated: qI 1 D 7 /�} Notary Public and for State of Wa rt o, : . • Notary (Print) MARGARET J.`F ULLAR ` • My appointment exp' • - Project Name: Sprit I'c ova P hlloh oPo tivuser Project Number: LO %-91 10(0 i CU A �( NOTARY.DOC c:` rA CITE OF RENTON -Z." Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor . : .. Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 10, 1997 Washington State • , Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section PO Box"47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: ' :Environmental Determinations . ", - _ , Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 09,1997 `1:,DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE :•- ; '. .` %;. , • _ SPRINT MONOPOLE USER - :'�: �: . :<:.,:':� '.�:::• : ='� :, ; .. _. - ON HO LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF. :. ".,The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review in order to replace an '.''existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140foot monopole for a wireless communication system. Location: 919 -Houser Wa North. . .1, ,. - Y -' Appeals of either the environmental.det.ermination[RCW 43 21.0075(3),.WAC 197-11-680]and/or the land use : -decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00.PM September 29, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both - actions will become final..Appeals must be filed in wnting together with the`required $75.00 application fee with::Heering - : Examiner,City of Renton,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton; WA 98055..::Appeals"to the Examiner are governed by`City of 'Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B: Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the ..Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501 . • -; If you have questions, please call me at(425)235-2719. - ' , •'._ ;,, ;, .:,, : For the Environmental Review Committee, ' '• :, ...;:, . _ Peter Rosen Project Manager..._ cc:`'.., King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro : . . Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries - David F:Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources ' - -.Don Hurter, Department of Transportation' ' - Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public Utilities - - .. . Duwamish Tribal Office`:: = " , - : Rod Malcom,Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) - r - Rita Perstac, Pu et Power f• - - 1 l -- t6,• t: AGNcvr:ru noc� •::.. 1200 Mill Avenue South=Renton,Washington'98055 - meµ. CIT. JF ,RENTON ,: : Planning/Building/Public Works Department - ✓ Jesse Tanner,Mayor _ Greggimmerman P.E.,Administrator . - - reg • September 9, 1997 • Mr.Tom'Paine Sprint Spectrum. 11000 NE 33rd Place, Suite 200 _ Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Sprint Monopole on Houser Project No. LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF;; - :. :.< :,::•'_ Dear Mr.-Paine: This letter is:written on behalf of the:Environmental Review Committee,(ERC) and is to inform you that they have completed their review of the environmental impacts of the above-referenced project.•:The Committee, on September 09, 1997, decided that your project will be issued a Determination,ofNon-Significance._= "r ave'a robable si nifcant,adverse `1"he City of Renton ERC has•determined that it does not;,h � � p g impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is.not required under RCW 43.21C;030(2)(c). .This decision was made by the ERC under the authority of Section 4-6-6, Renton Municipal Code, after review of:a completed environmental checklist and other information, on file with the lead agency.:This information is available to the public on request. :. ' . Appeals. of either the environmental determination RCW 43.21.q075(3), WAC .197-11-680 and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 20,1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton;'200 Mill Avenue South, Renton;•WA 98055:.;Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of . RentonMunicipal Code Section 4-8-1.1 B. ,Additional information regarding the appeal.process may be obtained from the • Renton City Clerk's Office,_(425)-235-2501,. .. If you have any questions or desire clarification of the above, please call me at(206)235-2719: For the Environmental Review Committee;' Peter Rosen Project Manager . .;; - ' Cc: Mr. Ronald Anderson/Owner: } SLT s - DN , `_." - n,Washiri ton 08055 _ � 200Mill Avenue South�:Remo g .. . . . bnoi....�• .; ... .. .. CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF.NON-SIGNIFICANCE CONDITIONS APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum,do Tom Paine PROJECT NAME: Sprint Monopole on Houser DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: :The applicant seeks an"Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review in order to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication system. • LOCATION OF.PROPOSAL: _ 919 Houser Way North • - The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Sprint Monopole on Houser, File No. LUA-97-106, CU--A, ECF, is approved,subject to the following conditions. - 1. The applicant provide evidence of FAA approval of the height of the monopole, prior to • the issuance'of building ermits: r: -5.. '2.:If the FAA requires lighting, or marking of the monopole,the applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance. • • • • • • • • • CITY OF RENTON • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum, do Tom Paine PROJECT NAME: Sprint Monopole on Houser • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review in order to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication system. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL . 919 Houser Way North - - Advisory Notes to Applicant:. The following notes are supplemental Information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. = Airport.Manager` - • The applicant does not furnish any information as to the elevation of the;base of the tower. The :: tower manufacturer provided information that the base would be at 33'.':,If the ground elevation is. - • in fact 33',the altitude of the monopole above sea level would be 173 feet. The Airport " • - Horizontal Surface is at an altitude of 179'. )(the tower's top has an altitude exceeding 179' -,above sea level, it should not be:constructed:'A review'of the'proposal by the FAA prior to " permit issuance is requested. r • • Construction Services Building permit is required. • Plan Review ... _ A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP)shall be required with a building , permit. . . • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum, do Tom Paine PROJECT NAME: Sprint Monopole on Houser DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and ' Environmental Review in order to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication system. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 919 Houser Way North LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section This Determination of Non-Significance is issued under WAC 197-11-340. Because other agencies of jurisdiction may be involved, the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 29, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: September 15, 1997 DATE OF DECISION: September 9, 1997 SIGNATURES: )d4 ///,',/e-eve trim qfr/9 Gregg Zim r r rmari; dmmistratdr DATE Departme t°•f Planning/Building/Public Works Sam Chastain, Administrant r DA Community Se ice Department / Lee- Wier, ire Chief DATE Re n"Fire Department Document3 CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum, do Tom Paine PROJECT NAME: Sprint Monopole on Houser DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review in order to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication system. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 919 Houser Way North Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. Airport Manager The applicant does not furnish any information as to the elevation of the base of the tower. The tower manufacturer provided information that the base would be at 33'. If the ground elevation is in fact 33',the altitude of the monopole above sea level would be 173 feet. The Airport Horizontal Surface is at an altitude of 179'. If the tower's top has an altitude exceeding 179' above sea level, it should not be constructed. A review of the proposal by the FAA prior to permit issuance is requested. Construction Services Building permit is required. Plan Review A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (TESCP) shall be required with a building permit. CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE CONDITIONS APPLICATION NUMBER: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum, c/o Tom Paine PROJECT NAME: Sprint Monopole on Houser DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review in order to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication system. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 919 Houser Way North The Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the Sprint Monopole on Houser, File No. LUA-97-106, CU-A, ECF, is approved,subject to the following conditions. 1. The applicant shall provide evidence of FAA approval of the height of the monopole, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. If the-FAA requires lighting, or marking of the monopole,the applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance. I \''i :131 (11*H...10 .i.... 11r....1 , ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION • PROJECT NAME: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF The applicant seeks en Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review in order to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication • system.Location:919 Houser Way North. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE • ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. nAPPEALS OF EITHER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION IRCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197.11- 8801 AND/OR THE LAND USE DECISION MUST BE FILED IN-WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM SEPTEMBER 29,1997.IF NO APPEALS ARE FILED BY THIS DATE,BOTH ACTIONS WILL BECOME . FINAL. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED$75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH:HEARING EXAMINER,CITY OF RENTON,200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH, • RENTON,WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON • MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4.6.11B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERICS OFFICE,(425)-2352501 0 1 5 IAGi1Rif'� _: (I I / ©q•••, f, .0 r ' r srnrE`NN' / • Bs. N • .J -.INT -..WAY }} 'J'1'1.. S r `Nod56P ^`',^il i ' ' 'egg. Goa/ • FOR FURTHER I II-UHMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT-REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION I IPlease Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file Identification. • CERTIFICATION • I, n{rirAl/AN tn , hereby certify that -5 copies of the above document were posed by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on . Sa'T3'7"Il??-r? J/ f0g? __ Signed: .0`%/�� • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) ' certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that h14-77 Al-7. signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and ycfP.ini rry-a•ci,for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ''• 0t�13ny j Dated: 'g/» d + °'4/ ei NotaryPubli and for Siat' aj ash�Pngton .; � ��j. PIJL-L.AR Notary .(Print) . My appointment expir MMISSIONEXPitriebEl9f - Nor ARY,OOC • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF The applicant seeks an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review in order to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole for a wireless communication system. Location: 919 Houser Way North. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. XXX APPEALS OF EITHER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION[RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11- 680] AND/OR THE LAND USE DECISION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM SEPTEMBER 29.1997. IF NO APPEALS ARE FILED BY THIS DATE,BOTH ACTIONS WILL BECOME FINAL. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED $75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH: HEARING EXAMINER, CITY OF RENTON, 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH, RENTON, WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-11B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)-235-2501 I .3N '3N3 132131N0 ,o. �_ I• '® I 6 � o f r N ' i N•'' INTO AY0,07 _ P .�♦,,l t V GARDEN Y �,e ° rye 2 `�.. t. FOR FURTHER f%NI-OR ATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION <.:;;:>;'::.>'<:<':'hl�ase::�r��l.�d�;the AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON,WASHINGTON- The Environmental Review Committee SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- Significance for the following project under 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal LUA-97-106,ECF,CU-A newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months E review and a conditional use permit to replace existingg prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language monopole for a wireless communication continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County system.Location:919 Houser Way North. Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper order of the Superior Court of the Appeals of either the environmental PP 9by P � determination (RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC State of Washington for King County. : 197-11-680) and/or the land use decision The notice in the exact form attached, was published in the South County must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 pm September 29, 1997.If no appeals are Journal(and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers filed•)y this date, both actions will become during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a final.'Appeals must be filed in writing toget ier with the required$75.00 applica- tion lee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Sprint Monopole on Houser- LUA-97-106, ECF, CU-A Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal as published on: 9/15/97 Code Section 4-8-11B. Additional informa- tion regarding the appeal process may be rg g ' g publication is the sum of$44.92 obtained from the Renton City Clerk's The full amount of the fee charged for said a Oln Offia (425)235 t2501. Legal Number 3615 Published in the South County Journal September 15, 1997.3615 eg Clerk, S�o�l h County Journal Subscribed and sworn before me on this-2, `d"ay of ►;..!i-, 19 ,,.otit,ull.,,-, COL .ssioNA9., ? Notary Public of the State of Washington . :4O 14'„; ti; residing in Renton �;' NOTARY `� y= King County, Washington •':O PUBL\G O' • O�. '�,� .2 6: 2. ''�v� NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER LUA-97-106,ECF,CU-A Environmental review and administrative conditional use permit to replace existing monopole for a wireless communication system. Location: 919 Houser Way North. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM September 29, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. Publication Date: September 15, 1997 Account No. 51067 dnspub City.., ,:enton Department of Planning/Building/F_._-_ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET • REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: pollce.• COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 02, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 1997 • APPLICANT: SPRINT SPECTRUM PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER WORK ORDER NO: 78253 LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 42,400 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets(6 ft high by 30" square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. ' - A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g. Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth • Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services ✓ . Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet • i /2Z/ Grn160C-/ &7) 10e Gl ee 1),0 - • B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signatbre of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 aenton Department of Planning/Building/r-wuc Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tuits. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 02, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 1997 APPLICANT: SPRINT SPECTRUM PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN ' PROJECT TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER WORK ORDER NO: 78253 ' LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 42,400 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 ' antennas. Five equipment cabinets(6 ft high by 30" square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural - Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet /e4`- _. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS 946 726 v2/611- C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 6e/y2*/0e;e- t— /-10 /2V)4L-7 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to pr fly assess this proposal. ZZ,/l 7 Signature of Director or Authorized epresentative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City or rcenton Department of Planning/Building/Fe Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:camilstmatm Se*utC 6 COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 02, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 1997 -"nr OF RENTON APPLICANT: SPRINT SPECTRUM PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN 7: IVED PROJECT TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER WORK ORDER NO: 78253 AUG 2 0 1997 LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North __„ • ..ivo DIVISION SITE AREA: 42,400 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets(6 ft high by 30" square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Wafer Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS gcLier/AA-i,-4-444"-A-41-A11-4-4-e-A-J We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where a Il nal information is needed to pr perly assess this proposal. - ki/f7 Signature of Dire •r or Authorize epresentaf Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City . nton Department of Planning/Building/ Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW .SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: su ai,elwaoe -. COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 02, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF ��!! DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 1997 ITY nF RFMCN APPLICANT: SPRINT SPECTRUM PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER WORK ORDER NO: 78253 AUG 2 0 1917 LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North m.v��tlJuVl� UiVi uN SITE AREA: 42,400 Sq.Ft. BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets(6 ft high by 30" square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet { B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS No Pulor wovkS f f7) tOe✓Wt(CS Veltuiv d We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. A)ej 0X ' vzl Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City i.znton Department of Planning/Building/F Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:— `,uvi 8{‘CVN COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 02, 199fITY OF RE SON Plaxiv APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 1997 Ate 7397 APPLICANT: SPRINT SPECTRUM PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN 2 u PROJECT TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER WORK ORDER NO: 78253 LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 42,400 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets(6 ft high by 30" square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable' Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts. impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air • Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS ))I) ted �/ �VIPS a5soc fated ZR1 proj -pit J 't Lb-Le-0-Q 1,/,() /Y#6 yGt l01► �. veflovrdi C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS No CO Vi4 M We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. JOe 1)4 61./q) ' Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 wr MTON FIRE DEPT T'nN BUREAU City or tcenton Department of Planning/Building/Puun. Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION RAgytE0V IHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: RrG e �tcAn COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 02, 'I P' ' APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 1997 APPLICANT: SPRINT SPECTRUM PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER WORK ORDER NO:. 78253 LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 42,400 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets (6 ft high by 30" square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS 4/4 , We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess thal: Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City yr rcenton Department of Planning/Building/ Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: KW% C2 1 Cco) r OMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 02, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 1997 APPLICANT: SPRINT SPECTRUM PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER WORK ORDER NO: 78253 LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 42,400 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets (6 ft high by 30"square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet I , B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS Jo CowiWKW We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. l\ll ut/G�i']ed L g/Z7 Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City in rtenton Department of Planning/Building/F41,W,-;Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Awrporfi COMMENTS DUE: SEPTEMBER 02, 1997 APPLICATION NO: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF DATE CIRCULATED: AUGUST 20, 1997 APPLICANT: SPRINT SPECTRUM PROJECT MANAGER: PETER ROSEN PROJECT TITLE: SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER WORK ORDER NO: 78253 LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North SITE AREA: 42,400 Sq.Ft. I BUILDING AREA(gross): 1,000 Sq.Ft. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets (6 ft high by 30" square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water LightGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet The applicant does not furnish any information as to the elevation of the base of the. tower. The tower mfr provided information that the base would be at 33' . If the ground elevation is in fact 33' , the altitude of the monopole above sea level would be 173' . The Airport Horizontal Surface is at an altitude of 179' . If the tower is 150' tall , it may not be constructed per City Code, regardless of the ground elevation. If the tower's top has an altitude exceeding 179' above sea level , it should not be constructed. A review of th eproposal by the FAA prior ;to permit issuance is requested. B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The application states that the new monopole would not be lighted unless required by the FAA. The existing monopole is lighted at 70' , the new one should be required to be lighted, and the owner required to maintain insurance in the event lighting maintenance is not conducted. This should be referred to Risk Mgmt for review. C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS If required to be lighted, the City does not have personnel or equipment to maintain the required lighting. See Sec. 4-31-17D. Any permit for construction of the tower which involves required lighting, must:contain the requirement that• the owner install , operate and maintain markers and lights thereon. Risk Management should also review: the permit to determine any insurance requirements. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additio•. information is ded to properly assess this proposal. aroffti4Gzz, tT7 j Signature o u!rector or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DO Rev.10/93 Nikvii ,_, 17:su i•a.a J X / J� K1. / 11 !!!/// BM.".10 M `� IA �ai e VIMM i �� I it." 't ,- LI a 610 S. f� t M �_ I A is �`� WPM l .. r ii, '*AVrj..: i . I AL_ IC ,_:,, -: . . g<,,, 0 L(2-I-2.2 2 114 Xt - :.- - . p -,,,.i. k- Vi A ',ALVA ' J 111 Ot1611171111 i x — mit u..,' ii. 11 " ; ..: rr 4 ..47"-' - - 413--i-Adb, c' it Mai'21- 0114.'- MT' i'' i IMII ::,..1,_. ... , ... _ _ ____ __ ...___„..._„_:,. ...id , /41/ . : , , It -,____).-‘ „Ali- . !V • IP --"•-•••••...... 11 I, al mi I .„, . . - 1-■ Y J i •3 03 OS all •, ~ I........: ,/..1t---r.. r ��.. J^'raj ��\ I 4� 1 .! a! 4, . q-1-- 4-ip,‘ . iNAilli.7-0,„. . . 4pplfr - -- ita'W 1 •-•at 1' n A A rA 4,4;441146., " iio lad! ....1 A_ 1 ' ii, ,./„..„., ,-a jr . , ( t. ..,E, , ... . .11 ''-: FT ,,.../,,acelaiu• 11,71ritiii!,0::;EL,, 70.40-_ L.. il, 41#071r.. \ . , .,,I.,,,,,,,,,c ,._,,,__ ,_. k .,,,,.„. , fl hi i U I s =•� �� ..fl =F.1`lgjiMB- i r] riqb �; ,_a •II.. 1 ., ater 1.( ITA a na a_a w a .a. I` AM e1.I• _ r r II ice'- � n 1;_ �� ;�ilii -- , -� „, r,ai anal 4 4• " V V .1jA°imiru ma . ii 1., , . *4 3N/-k„„ Li o. � -aC ��,`��'�� .I 'll w�.....II, � t��1 ilh -O.1174 Fil -rk \ 1 D ��- a a F � ��1 .� ,... rill lumf..)01.Lf I lt• - 1 1 T t U 1 75FF t 1 • "r l a I11'u•'� a aja`%,4 _36 QZI�tli�_ JE,', I.Fit c.IM I, 13 - �i.�4 an M al • �` tii l ' `, • ."F � cI 6,\ _ _ .... \Ito C-.1 -OCCi rill E.T.DC2E I ...& y t4 ii:BUMMINIIIR1111110 illibfk Vi 1 V II t■ I` ailL 1 , itml lb" _ z,:'.7-.14e-__- --- a' 117) '—- DO L :1 lir i ih. - ,,,/:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:__ --..... •4111 ii.mum Num mil -----7--_:::::::-;_:- :____-7',.,161:,,,`="137,,,,v-70 d- 0! P 1‘1; —tibi, 1" '. i-et. rlir cc,,,, _, ' 1 w ....7... ii°4:1_:::_:-:!..-:!....-_--:-.!_:::::....:_::_:_-___:_:_.::__::::.:-:::::::-______-_-_::-.:-:.-::-::_::::71e>. ,.._..._ i A : i_\ .ic -- glition!thi .: 4 1.4 1 idj . ' I dm \) --_-:::=E:E=E:E=E:E=E: ::::::-EEEEEEEEE:-.EEEEEEE.E.::::::E.7.=.:':::E::_.::_:-H:=1*--_5:-.:::::N61- t.-§ea E-- E . 9 ,,,, ,....._.z.7.0-ri,., .. ..,...411: dri 1 - ,I p--„, „..,,,, ..n. ,iii... __ ,,,,,,„ ,,,,, ti„.. 1,11,3„mi „.„.. ".- ir , ,-::-:::::::::_ _:::::::::::::::::::::_,_:__-__-_-_:_:_,_:....„:_w-,_-_„:„:::_:_,_:__ ....t.......„,,m qc[j :.. d A •-•=titai ..„ ,-- . I r " -. ' 1. AI -KI:E:::::::::::: ::::::::E:::::::::::::::-.1K:E:E:i:_f_cH:E:H:EEK:E:: :::::_.:E:E:E.:E:::.:E::::__Li-_-__-:_:_::_:774Z . I - .kr4 .. .,ci ct . . .,-,.... - 1%111 i 'X-53,....-;;I:---..:.:-:-:.:-E:iii::::.:E:E:3:::..:Eg::::::::.:::.:::::::::::::::ff::::-.7-:-:-:-:-.7-:-:-_ -::-:-_-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-_:_:_:_:_:_:_-__:_:_:_: -----\--;1‘1114 ".". .1-;11;0011;,., -.4\1 ill -. 91 RV,-=...7 111 "Irc__LE:::::_CE:E::.;K:E_E..:-:E.::::.EE::::_*:-:E_Er..::Ef.71:7.1E:E.::::*:_;..ELEEE:E::..EEK.7:-:::-..:::.:E:E:57:::::::::::*:EEEEE:3:E..:::_::-.7.7_::--__it:T:34;f 7 _ _ _ ----_ _• ___ __________ •)i ass— 1■ —�: �i,�. NA�':' '1 =__=_=='=_=__=__==-Nbr. „.,:-.„,.-::::-.„_,-,,,,,,,,::„:„.-„,_:„.„..„:„.,---.-=_=_==- : _ ==='====_ _\� `I♦ ram• "==E==__==_ _____=====— __= _-===_== -=_K:::r / 1\Tpliw -1 .. Ilk -_,_:::-:._:,,,,:::::::::::_,„_,:_,_:_,._:_:::__,::::-„,;_,..„__::„„*„.„...„,_ii, ,j4 ,, 7'i 3 i I i .ill.."7-11* -::::::::::::::::::-. -:-.F.-:-F. pi 1....-........:7=::::::-2-:-:-:::::::::::-:-:....__.-Z-:-:- 44-_:,:i-„E::::::E-:-...E,,,_:,:::::::::::::::::::::-__---- .... 3 ' '‘'. 3 tit ' ._ '11) V _ w ,. . .4 ei:. 1f��1�I— fir -----N.,----::-:::'---:::::::::::::_:::::::::::::::::::,„:„.::::::::::,,, --- ------= V ANTENNAS MONOPOLE REACTIONS OVERTURN - 3517.6 F7-K TYPE ANTENNA ELEV. LINE SHEAR - 35.0K (15) AP17 - 1900 150' 1 5/8" 150'-0" = - MAX1 DOWN - 32.9K (9) AP17 - 1900 130' 1 5/8" o r 23.20" 0 (2) 8' DISHES 140' 1 5/8" in c 0 GENERAL NOTES: 114'-9" �l- 30.14 0 o i 1. MONOPOLE IS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EIA/TIA-222-E tn 11O'-3" r- FOR 100 MPH. WIND AT EL. 33'. (87 MPH W/1" ICE) \ - 31 .75" , . z c� , WIC LPL.+� 2. MONOPOLE STEEL (MIN. STEEL YIELD) 50 KSI. l N - N,, � '• � 3. CONNECTION BOLTS ARE A-325 HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS HOT o \ 81 ' 4 36.57" hS , 1,:i A DIP GALVANIZED) COMPLETE W/LOCK WASHERS AND HEAVY HEX NUT. ''`� 4. MONOPOLE AND ACCESSORIES ARE (HOT DIP GALVANIZED) II fx to - 38.48' d r N ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A-123 FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL. w T , ' ,p�' � ` ASTM A-153 OF ASTM B-965 CLASS 65 FOR HARDWARE. a_ w1NNai 5. DESIGN ASSUMES ALL TRANSMISSION LINES THROUGH THE I— o 55'-1 1" �41 .1 6" INSIDE OF THE MONOPOLE. w �� c �,�,cs� in CA 50'-0" T 43.88" 0 N c 0 o� �` 26'-7" h r. 46.33" 0 �, ii- o 1 Ln 20'-0" 48.88" 0 I6„`,,' cal cr _ SEE BASE \u WNW (pi `�' PL. DWG. lk ••' `='/ TYP. ASSEMBLY 52.05" 0 _ Li N M III =I I I, III I I FOUNDATION PLAN VIEW \ A '' C O , � � ter= a' w w W W w -—III —I II COALFIELD SITE — RENTON, WA. cn cn cn cn cn I I— 1 ;III=1 I 150' PULE DRAWN BY DATE ,)EBi# A.F. 10-17-96 DRAWING ND. APPR, BY1 NO DATE REVISION BY CWA1096 4-31-16 4-31-18 ministrator shall determine which ordinance C. Use Restrictions: Notwithstanding any other shall prevail based upon the intent of the provisions of this Code, no use may be made zones. Life, safety and public health ordinan- of land within any airport approach zone or ces are assumed to prevail. (Ord. 4404, airport turning zone in such a manner as to 6-7-1993) create electrical interference with radio com- munication between the airport and aircraft, making it difficult for fliers to distinguish 4-31-17: AIRPORT ZONING: between airport lights and others, result in glare in the eyes of fliers using the airport, A. Zones: In order to regulate the use of proper- impair visibility in the vicinity thereof, or ty in the vicinity of the airport, all of the otherwise endanger the landing, taking off, land within two (2) miles south and one mile or maneuvering of aircraft. east and west of, or that part of the area that is within the City limits, whichever is D. Hazard Marking And Lighting: Any permit nearest the boundaries of the airport, is or variance granted as provided in this Chap- hereby divided into airport approach, tran- ter and affecting the airport approach, tran- sition and turning zones. The boundaries sition or turning zone shall be so conditioned thereof are shown on the Renton Airport as to require the owner of the structure or Approach Plan numbered No. 1, dated March tree in question to permit the City, at its 1, 1956, which plan is made a part hereof. own expense, to install, operate and main- tain thereon such markers and lights as may B. Height Limits: Except as otherwise provided be necessary to give adequate notice to in this Code, no structure or tree shall be aircraft of the presence of such airport erected, altered, allowed to grow or be main- hazard. (Ord. 1542, 4-17-1956) tained in any airport approach zone or air- port turning zone to a height in excess of the height limit herein established for such zone. 4-31-18: COURTS: In all buildings hereafter For the purposes of this regulation, the fol- erected or structurally altered, all win- lowing height limits are hereby established dows shall open upon a yard, court, street or alley for each of the zones in question: (Ord. 1542, as hereafter provided. In no event shall any yard 4-17-1956) or court be made to serve two (2) buildings hereafter erected, or any existing building and a 1. Approach Zones (Shaded Dark Red On building hereafter erected. Plan): Height limitation to be one foot (1') in height for each forty feet (40') lateral Every court shall be open and unobstructed to the separation from a line which is two hundred sky from the floor level of the lowest story in a feet (200') south from the "Displaced building in which there are windows from rooms Threshold" at Station No. 10+00 as shown on or apartments abutting the said court and served revised Renton Airport Approach Plan, No. by the said court, except that a cornice, belt 1-R, dated May 17, 1960, which approach plan is filed herewith and by this reference is made a part hereof. (Ord. 1829, 5-17-1960) 2. Approach Transition Zone (Shaded Light Red On Plan): Height limit to be one foot (1') in height for each seven feet (7') of lateral . separation from the Renton airport boun- dary. 3. Airport Turning Zone: Any object over one hundred fifty feet (150') in height is an obstruction. 996 City of Renton a 0 CITY OF RENTON .4. PlAnning/Building/Public Works , ., . ,. .,,,,b,- Csnr-,,,,M00 ,-), : 4, -,,...4.L., -...-ii.--4•21:Lar.saiiar • Mill Avenue South -Renton,Washington 98055 kg 4 0 02 9 2_,,, • 44, to ...i?„ - • PRE ARIEL) i;0-gfga • • • • 115U16 _U.S. POSTAGE 082305 9198 PACIFIC AGRO COMPOANY 1 PO Bo)026 , :3 RentorOVA 98057 vet L66/ i- IA)f DELIVERABLE <,--77,,—„4:-.; AS ADDRESSEI <C,'' 1 UNAgLE TO FORWARD nr-rlinki 1-n orkincEt ,..."---13 , v . cos 20 ...., P 5' IN d - e.94-77iisris2Afts .11-dislidiik iisti: 1_,1.1.11,,L1,1.,iti:n11,7,id 1,I c4, _ - - ,-A1)) I ��y O� �NTr� NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: AUGUST 20, 1997 An Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF/SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets(6 ft high by 30"square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. GENERAL LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Administrative Conditional Use Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted-•in writing to Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA'98055,'by 5:00 PM on September 03, 1997. If you have questions about this proposal, or wish to be made a party;of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Peter Rosen, the Project Manager, at;235-2719. Anyone'who submits•written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. I ' PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: AUGUST 8, 1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: AUGUST 19,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: AUGUST 20,1997 a^� p Il7ERSTp7E- P z J. INtERSTA WAY . • pARpEN .to yam GENMALOT.DOC \/\jam\�\!' >;•.: y *�N• �_ L ... ..!'•, V,; b3 fib_ \''A:�� I=—_—__— • Y<. F:RENTON<:>>::::;>;;;'«:>«<::> :<:>< ;:..i ; : : >; :>.:;: : ' > :>::::>::::>>::>::>:: ::<:; <:»:»:::>:::::>:::>::::>::::>;>::::>::>: >:<::<::::::;::: DEV.ECOPMENT:::SERVICES.DI.....S.O . .............. ........ ER..�::::Y OWN RS .Illiii E T O LISTOF:: SURRO:UN •DtNG::P:.. .O. :.... . :..::... ::.... .:. :...:: :: :: : :<:ct ;:Ite < <`<: >> '::'`>><' > < :<? 5''>° f'`fie sub a t..s»::.:wi F � 300 feet o..t PROJECT NAME: loa_-c-vc 1 ►-J IJ R.ENT - ODD APPLICATION NO: WA q1 — IDIP, CV-Pt, The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME ADDRESS •• ._ . ASSESSOR'S PARCEL ��_-_._._ • • . NUMBER . # 1 * MetroScan / King * Owner :City Of Renton Parcel # :082305 9011 08 Site :801 Garden Ave N Renton 98055 Sale Date :11/15/88 Mail :200 Mill Ave S Renton Wa 98055 Sale Price . : Use : 625 Ind,Manufacturing,Aircraft Asd.V ' . :$18,'974, 600 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 11 POR NW 1/4 LY Q:NW S:08 T:23N R:05E , Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories: BldgSF: Ac:44.00 YB: Ph: # 2 h`;: TAT �;;, MetroScan / King : Owner :J,,,,bwE Ica nt'e� ,-ises Inc Parcel #, :082305 9168 09 Site 54 v N Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail •~: G' Box 79014;\-3eattle Wa 98119 Sale Price Use 5`t� `�0riei;�J `r,glb'u e, 10k To 25k Sqft Asd.V :$736 000 Lgl J :Sa'F $'0305 'T&XLGT 168 POR:•GL• 1 BEG Q:NW S:08 T:23N�R:05E Bedrm r„4 ,' i'iL'g, Y'.� /'' / Stories:1 BldgSF:15, 125 Ac:1.57' YB:1965 Ph: # 3 V ' ,5). "� ='= =, MetroScan / King * Owner :Ppeir�c�°°C16c G-�,,'` Parcel # :082305 9171 04 Site : 97 r,,; o1�se'F,rbV'ay N Renton 98055 bale Date :02/01/91 Mail :7755 'marginal Way S Seattle Wa 98108 Sale Price :$825, 000 Full Use :503 Ind,Warehouse, l0k To 25k Sqft Asd.V :$752,700 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 171 POR GL 1 BEG Q:NW S:08 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H:. / / Stories:1 BldgSF:22, 652 Ac:1.57 YB:1965 Ph:206-655-1341 # 4 * MetroScan / King *. Owner :Aurora Acres Inc Parcel # :082305 9190 01 Site : 903 Houser Way N Renton 98055 Sale Date Mail :PO Box 15236 Seattle Wa 98115 Sale Price Use :503 Ind,Warehouse, l0k To 25k Sqft Asd.V :$753, 400 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 190 POR GL 1 & Q:NW S:08 T:23N R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF:10, 800 Ac: .80 YB:1971 Ph: # 5 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Aurora Acres Inc Parcel # L ::082305 9190 01 Site : 903 Houser Way N Renton 98055 ' Sale Date Mail :PO Box 15236 Seattle Wa 98115 :. ' 4 Sale Price Use :503 Ind,Warehouse, 10k To 25k Sqft •• Asd.V :$753, 400 Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 190 ,POR GL 1 & Q NW- •:5:08.- ,T:23N. ,R:05E Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 BldgSF: 9, 114 Ac: .80 YB:1971 Ph: # 6 * MetroScan / King * Owner :Pacific Agro Compoany • .Parcel # :082305- ,9198'' -03 Site : 903 Houser Way N Renton 98055 Sale Date : Mail :PO Box 326 Renton Wa 98057 Sale Price - Use :502 Ind,Warehouse,2k To 10k Sqft Asd.V :$283p-i01f , ^ ' Lgl :STR 082305 TAXLOT 198 BN OPER Q:NW 5:08 T:23N _ 5En-ri~'', Bedrm: Bth F3H: / / Stories:1 B1dgSF:5, 478 Ac: .56 Ph- C. oc.•O .. , `; ..' jf w. ',1-,1. '. '-: ,(Attach additional sheets, if necessary) ;i ,, .¶'' ,1 .. E. `k ��tv c 3T ;,i 3PSINv: • jEV�L 1 GITY OF R�NTOPLP9 (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER • • Applicant Certification I, J OM `Pi (J E. , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) 1. owners and their addresses were obtained from: l ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records ' . . _ . 0" Title Company Records 0 King County Assessors Records v ' , ' Signed i �'-- ..- Q Date g I S 'el 7 : (Applicant) = . NOTARY r -> ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, iq and for the State of Washington, residing at StAir ,2- I on the S-f`day of t.s-F , 199-9 Signed Q , TD % KLD.COLGAN (Notary Pu I' 1 • ''� ERTIF >::ATIO:>::> :><>I:a•I:N::>:::; ` ..0 ICA tON'.OEIVIAIL NG�'>>`<<`<''� <� <` ''` '<? `<<< 's»< � � <3<�»<' is<>y> '�iiiit .;€« ' : .:::>`'<hereby ce t t a ..not ce :of t e: .o osed"`"alication w :re m`a led:t>'> iiiEN •411`•. • • ......:••"":.:.:•...... .:".,;,:•:;.:::::.:sot ,:p,. p. :: >app at o... e e ma ed to.....;»::.;; .................................................................................................... eacti listecJ ii. .ro .e t. ::o...n. r...o..:.:.:...:... .:::.. :..;<:::: ::::::>':: ':»::> ::>::::::>:::>:::>::>:::>:: :>i<:::»:: :>::: >. `:;:' .............. :........ > [`Da»>:' : :; . : .. :;• » `:'.:: : .:,:```< :' :' Signed<<>'� <::: : '< >«I ::� :<::<< >;>'«>< > °<<> ` > ....: ate S;; ':'p;�.::;i::•:-:::::y�': :::::::i` :::`:`::::::;;: <_:;i:;::::<::::'�::�:::::`:::::: :i:::::::::::: ?::::::i::: ::2Y:;:;;:;`:;:;:': ;:;:;:;: ;:'+.2;:;.`:;:%';:;;:;<;:: :: +;:;;Y;:;:;%j::"2'< :;<:::'•.: '+.::� ::::::::'%::::::::::: ::: ±::::<:':::::: ::t�:2:<::: i 6.T Subscribed andisworn°before::`meP:a Nota Public in a d for;the;::State of Washington .: se{cJiih�j.;gatt.mu.:Y�.*';;S.L-::::f >:::>:.;;.ohe.:;� : sna oto!..;daY:<of:;.,:: ic*:.r.. .: . .. ...:.:..;:1.9.......�.�..?:<:.;;:.:;:.;:.;;;: . '..-. -.. giffilop-1....-,;k440.6.(.1.Ai,wegoo.6.1*::,::::!,:..iisi,,,,,mi,:.:.::: ::,:::::::::;:„,,,s,i,i,ig..i,ii?..?...„,i,i,mi,...,,i,i,..:.:::,::::,igi,,.,:,,,,iiiii,,ii..t.,,iimii.:i,1„%......,-„i-..;•,,::::„,i,i,mi,.„ ,i,i,i,i,, ,..:::i.„:0,m,,„p•ii,i,:i::!::::.,:, ... I`sTPtPa°° MARILYN KAMCHEFF ' •^aEv o ca 2 COMMISSION EXPIRES 6/29/99 / /1 • Uti�Y U� NOTICE OF APPLICATION tt PLANNINGIBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS • DATE: AUGUST20,1997 An Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review Application has been filed and accepted with the ' Development Services Division of the City of Renton.The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. ' PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF I SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 fool • I monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets(0 R high by 30•square)would be installed near the base of the ' monopole. • GENERAL LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North ' STUDIES REQUIRED/0R AVAILABLE: WA ' PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review - ' Administrative Conditional Use Permit • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen,Project Manager,Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on September 03,1997. If you have I ' questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Peter Rosen,the Project Manager,al 235-2719. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. • PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: AUGUST 8,1997 I • NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: AUGUST 19,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: AUGUST 20 1997 iiiii.e • • 1-I II. e w . Ii ' C & !i 9a Z I. "'. Teo"NW i -''',;,• NTEPa i. o N -au aeTATE= Y� ---IN, .re I ..• ... ;'\' 00SEP % tL' ' • a GENMALOT.DOC .i' i. .N., __-- ------.- - •, CERTIFICATION • 1, /I'M rn„A/A/I 0 , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on , A&usf Z.bie1/7 •• Signed: Xf . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) • •. 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that `ii>4 / /' ' /1/n1/.: .,1...: . signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and volume' 9,tpil iiot;t a uses • a ;;:.....::ICJ and purposes mentioned in the instrument. .`:,` ,,• s-b: °•,.. 'I . 'I/� j�^i `.fir - . y { n .00Qn : Dated: 42-/ 7 / ...,..,,.„,• =�. Notary Pu. • in and •r the Stale(b,f�°IN{a hI lm• :. .• Notary (Print) ARGARET.J."PULLAR My appointment expircoMMISSInw'FxPIRFR e;/9/Qg NOTARY,DOC Gy�Y �'et• f 414k04 + �N'ivTo. NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: AUGUST 20, 1997 An Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Review Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF/SPRINT MONOPOLE ON HOUSER DESCRIPTION: Applicant proposes to replace an existing 70 foot high monopole with a 140 foot ' monopole with 12 antennas. Five equipment cabinets(6 ft high by 30"square)would be installed near the base of the monopole. GENERAL LOCATION: 919 Houser Way North STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: N/A PUBLIC APPROVALS: - Environmental Review Administrative Conditional Use Permit • Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Peter Rosen, Project Manager, Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA.98055, by 5:00 PM on September 03, 1997. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail, contact Peter Rosen, the Project Manager, at 235-2719. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: AUGUST 8,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: AUGUST 19,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: AUGUST 20 1997 1997 I fi -rA - - 71yy:bH - t • I H z TATNWy N, J. INTp5 ._ r0., Wpy " , :i ,�''� t too' �� ..•`".` I s �'� .f • 2 aV " ` GARpgN _ . GENMALOT.DOC �� I[ .. :j.:. CITE OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 20, 1997 Mr.Tom Paine Sprint Spectrum 11000 NE 33rd Place, Suite 200 Bellevue, WA 98004 SUBJECT: Sprint Monopole on Houser Project No. LUA-97-106,CU-A,ECF Dear Mr. Paine: The Development Planning Section of the:City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to`"submittal requirements and, therefore, -is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on September 9, 1997. Prior to that review,you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. " Please contact me, at 235-2719, if you have any questions: ., Sincerely, • Peter Rosen Project Manager cc: Mr: Ronald Anderson/Owner ACCPTun.Doc . 200 Mill Avenue South-Renton, Washington 98055 CITY OF RENTON L.:JELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISIC, " : _ ,w , �4 MASTER APPLICATION OWNER(s) ' . PROJECTINFORMATION (cont.) Note:If there is more than one legal owner,please attach an additional notarized MasterAppfication for each owner. EXISTING LAND USE (S): NAME: Monopole II Ronald Anderson PROPOSED LAND USES: Monopole II ADDRESS: 919 Hauser Way North EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: CITY: ZIP: Center Neighborhood Renton,Washington 98055 - PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP TELEPHONE NUMBER: DESIGNATION: 206-271-5363 No comprehensive plan designation change requested. CONTACT=PERSON/APPLICANT EXISTING ZONING: NAME: IH--Industrial Heavy Sprint Spectrum,do Tom Paine PROPOSED ZONING: No zoning designation change requested. ADDRESS: 11000 NE 33`d Place,Suite 200 SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): Site area is 42,400 sq.ft. The proposed project will utilize CITY: ZIP: 1000 sq.ft. Bellevue,Washington 98004 PROJECT VALUE: TELEPHONE NUMBER: $50,000.00 425-602-2000 or 425-602-2310 THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA IS THE SITE PROJECT INFORMATION LOCATED IN: PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: No. Sprint Spectrum--Personal Communications System Base Facility North Renton/SAS Fluid Power(RENT 006-07) IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA? PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S) LOCATION: No. The subject property is located at 919 Hauser Way North. KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER: 082305-9167 DEVLLc),„,t CITyop R rNTo iIVI,NG LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY(Attach separatejsheet if necessary)". Please see attached legal description. - TYPE.OF APPLICATION & FEES. - . Check all application types that apply-City staff will determine fees. ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ REZONE $ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ SPECIAL PERMIT $ SHORT PLAT $ TEMPORARY PERMIT $ TENTATIVE PLAT $ X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $1000 PRELIMINARY PLAT $ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ FINAL PLAT $ GRADE&FILL PERMIT $ " (NO.CU.YDS: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ VARIANCE $ (FROM SECTION: ) PRELIMINARY WAIVER $ FINAL WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ MOBILE HOME PARKS: $ BINDING SITE PLAN $ SHORELINE REVIEWS: SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ CONDITIONAL USE $ VARIANCE $ EXEMPTION $ X ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $200 REVISION $ - AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP obtkjE I Print Name) 'LI'ax1S }. �1 ,declare that I am(please check one) the owner of the 74•.•••••".p t; �y°";involved in this application, the authorized representative to act for the property owner(please �� 'a, roof of authorization),and the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information �r�Rt'tAR�fe p,WIth submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. : 07o,...mow (afar u CIL.1 r ATTEST: Subscribed and sworn to before me, a - � •., 4+��AtEl.r4`Piblic,in a d'f�Lt�je., 11 •0 70*. N''fss �' G l�V![M State of Washington residing at: Qy1.- ,(/ .►o .$. ,on "' '•'"ti'Itlame of Owner/Representative) the day of 14,1114 5+_4996.f 177 / , (Signature of Owner/Representative) a/!.-e �� roar tik �l CGI (S Iture of Notary ublic) - (T'is sectio .e completed b Cit; ff.} City File Number: OW SA R SHPLCAJO L PP FP TP SP RVMP V AAD W FPUD SM SME MHP BCP A CPA" f TOTAL FEES: ®. TOTAL POSTAGE PROVIDED: $ ' !4 q The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M.lin King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing. at the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of said Section 8; thence south 89°28' 19" east along the south line of said northeast quarter, being also the north line of Eighth Avenue North, a distance of 391.90 feet; thence north 18°01' 34" west along the westerly line of unnamed access road, a distance of 1, 821.83 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left of radius 543. 69 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve 28.75" feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along aforementioned curve a distance of 62.69 feet to the end of said curve; thence tangent along a cource north 27°40'34" west a distance of 132.75 feet; thence south 71°58'26" west a distance of 201.81 feet; thence south 18°01' 34" east a distance of 193.0 feet; thence north 71°58'26" east a distance of 231.23 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNIG. Project Narrative: Sprint Spectrum proposes to replace a 70' monopole with a 140' monopole at the existing wireless PCS facility on the S.A.S. Fluid Power Company property, at 919 Hauser Way North, Renton, WA 98055. The S.A.S. Fluid Power Building, an industrial structure, occupies the property. The PCS base station consists of a monopole with an antenna mounting platform at the top(modified overall height to be 140 feet). The platform has three sides,facing north, southeast and southwest. Each face will have four antennas, approximately 70 inches tall, 6 inches wide and 2 inches deep. One Global Positioning System("GPS")antenna(2 inches tall by 4 inches in diameter),used for time synchronization purposes,will be mounted on the monopole. Five self- contained equipment cabinets are located near the base of the monopole. Each cabinet is 6 feet tall and 30 inches square. The site is screened with a slatted chain link security fence on the south and east sides. The facility is screened from the railroad to the west by an existing blackberry bush covered fence. Additional screening to the north and south is provided by existing buildings. We are requesting a landscaping waiver as the existing natural and built features provide adequate screening of the site (see photos). The total land area devoted to this PCS base station is 1000 square feet. There will be no tree cutting or land clearing associated with this monopole modification. The facility transmits radio signals in the 1850-1970 Megahertz range, and operates at very low power levels (less than 200 watts). The site operates 24 hours a day. Please see the attached site plans. The property is 0.96 acres or 41,700 square feet in area. There are no special site features on the subject property. There are no proposed off-site improvements associated with this project. b 9tl.rC V E D aka 8 i97 vEV I-C2 F RENTCN GNU August 8, 1997 "� Mr.Peter Rosen, Senior Planner it, City of Renton,Planning/Building/Public Works Departments `�� Municipal Building C�rr-�'�'�;., 200 Mill Avenue Renton,WA 98055outh `y TO v4, RE: SPRINT SPECTRUM WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY MONOPOLE CHANGE S.A.S.FLUID POWER(RENT-006-07)919 HOUSER WAY NORTH,RENTON,WA 98056 EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT#LUA-96-095 Dear Mr.Rosen: Please find attached an Administrative Conditional Use Permit Application to authorize Sprint Spectrum to modify the monopole at the existing Personal Communications Services(PCS) facility at 919 Hauser Way North. The details of Sprint Spectrum's request are fully set forth in the attached applications and drawings. This letter offers a brief summary, and explanation of Sprint Spectrum's wireless system,and the necessity for the requested monopole modification at the S.A.S.Fluid Power PCS site. Proposal: Sprint Spectrum proposes to replace a 70' monopole with a 140' monopole at the existing wireless PCS facility on the S.A.S. Fluid Power Company property, at 919 Hauser Way North, Renton, WA 98055. The S.A.S. Fluid Power Building, an industrial structure, occupies the property. The PCS base station consists of a monopole with an antenna mounting platform at the top(modified overall height to be 140 feet). The platform has three sides, facing north, southeast and southwest. Each face will have four antennas, approximately 70 inches tall, 6 inches wide and 2 inches deep. One Global Positioning System("GPS")antenna(2 inches tall by 4 inches in diameter), used for time synchronization purposes, will be mounted on the monopole. Five self- contained equipment cabinets are located near the base of the monopole. Each cabinet is 6 feet tall and 30 inches square. The total land area devoted to this PCS base station is 1000 square feet. The facility transmits radio signals in the 1850-1970 Megahertz range, and operates at very low power levels(less than 200 watts). The PCS station at S.A.S. Fluid Power is one of many interconnected facilities throughout the Puget Sound. The stations collectively form a wireless telephone network that enables users to move throughout the system with calls passing from one station to another. The existing monopole does not provide enough radio coverage to adequately connect to neighboring PCS base stations. A 140' monopole would provide the radio coverage necessary for this PCS base station to connect with neighboring stations. The S.A.S. Fluid Power base station facility is located on property zoned IH-Industrial Heavy, which permits Monopole II facilities as an Administrative Conditional Use. The adjoining uses are also zoned IH. The requested modification will allow this facility to provide digital PCS to the City of Renton, a portion of Interstate 405 and connect to the rest of the regional, national and international network. Page 1 S.A.S.Fluid Power/City of Renton 8/8/97/RENT 006-04 Code Compliance: Sprint Spectrum's proposal is consistent with the City of Renton's Building Regulations, Chapter 38,Wireless Communications Facilities, Section 4-38-11. Justification for Administrative Conditional Use Permit Request: The proposed PCS base station modification is consistent with the goals of the City of Renton's Wireless Communication Ordinance. Goal 1: The proposal is to modify an existing PCS base station located in an IH- Industrial Heavy zone. The neighborhood is industrial in nature and all adjacent property is zoned I-H. The modified monopole will be designed to accommodate collocation potentially minimizing the need for additional towers in the area. Goal 2: The modified monopole will strongly encourage the joint use of the site. The additional height would allow for the collocation of other wireless carriers. The modified monopole will be designed to structurally accommodate additional wireless carriers. The existing monopole does not provide adequate height to promote collocation. Goal 3: The proposed modification is located where adverse impact on the community is minimal. The new monopole will replace an existing monopole in an industrial neighborhood. Industrial land uses typically involve the widest allowed community environmental impacts, including noise, dust, and the operation of heavy equipment. The proposed use has none of these characteristic industrial impacts. Goal 4: The proposed modification will be configured to minimize adverse visual impact. The new monopole will allow for collocation, thus minimizing adverse visual impact by reducing the need for additional monopoles. The new monopole will be matte finished to minimize any glare and promote blending with natural sky. Goal 5: Approval of the Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the modification of this PCS base station enhances the ability of the providers of telecommunications service to provide such services to the community quickly, effectively, and efficiently. The modification will improve Sprint Spectrum's ability to more effectively provide the City of Renton with the best digital wireless communication technology available today. 4-38-14: Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria 1. The height of the proposed modification to the existing Sprint Spectrum PCS Wireless Facility is 140'. 2. The nearest residential boundary is across I-405 approximately .5 miles from the proposed modification location. 3. The site is located in an IH-Industrial Heavy zone. The surrounding land uses are industrial. The adjacent properties on all four sides are industrial. Industrial land uses typically involve the widest allowed environmental impacts, including noise, dust, and the operation of heavy equipment. The proposed modification to the existing PCS facility poses none of these characteristic industrial impacts. Additionally, there is an existing analog cellular monopole on the property directly to the north of the site. 4. The site is screened by a hillside that slopes down from I-405 and a ramp that leads to I- 405. Page 2 S.A.S.Fluid Power/City of Renton 8/8/97/RENT 006-04 1 5. The site is screened to the west by a blackberry bush covered fence and numerous blackberry bushes in the adjacent railyard. There are trees north of the I-405 access ramp that screen the site to the north. 6. The support structure is a monopole. Monopoles are designed to be visually less obtrusive than lattice or guyed structures..The modified height will allow for collocation by other carriers, effectively reducing visual obtrusiveness by reducing the need for an additional structure in the area. The mat finish will minimize glare to reduce visual obtrusiveness. 7. No additional ingress and egress will result from this site modification except for during the two week construction period. Contractors will use existing access. Maintenance visits to the unmanned facility will occur approximately once a month after construction completion. 8. There will be some traffic and noise during the two-week construction period. The finished site produces no noise expect for cooling fans in the radio cabinets. The fan noise is equivalent to the sound of a domestic fan at the nearest property line. 9. The existing 70' Sprint PCS monopole II facility is too short to provide the necessary radio coverage. A taller support structure is needed to adequately serve the nearby Renton area and connect with adjacent cells. The existing 120' US West monopole is also too short to offer collocation possibilities at this location for Sprint PCS. The highest Sprint PCS could locate would be 100' and 140' is necessary. There are no other collocatable facilities in the near vicinity that are tall enough to meet the required height. Consistency With Utilities Element of Comprehensive Plan Policy U-5: Sprint Spectrum is seeking to modify an existing PCS facility. The impact of the modification is minimal as'this is an existing site in an industrial neighborhood. All adjacent properties are industrial and the adjacent property to the north is the site of an existing US West monopole: The construction of the site will take approximately two weeks and produce minimal impacts. A small amount of traffic and noise will occur during construction. During normal operations the site will produce no impacts on adjacent land uses. Per the lease,the site will be dismantled within 6 months once no longer in use. Policy U-10: The modified monopole will be constructed within the same lease area as the existing Sprint Spectrum PCS facility. The 50' x 20' site is located in the.back northwest corner of the parcel. The above ground facilities are shielded to the railyard to the west by a blackberry bush covered fence. To the north and south the above ground facilities are screened by existing industrial buildings. To the east the site is screened by existing on site utilities and the slope up to I-405. The area to the immediate east of the lease area needs to remain undeveloped to accommodate the groundspace needs of additional carriers wishing to collocate on the proposed monopole. Policy U-30; The modification is being requested as the existing monopole does not provide the desired radio coverage from this location. Like the existing support structure, the new structure will be a monopole which is designed to be more aesthetically pleasing than a guyed or lattice tower. Once the new monopole is constructed the existing structure will be dismantled. The service area of this site is mainly the City of Renton between Rainier Avenue South and I-405. The additional height Page 3 S.A.S.Fluid Power/City of Renton 8/8/97/RENT 006-04 I * i is required toprovide line of site radio signal transmission alongthe nearby 1� section of the I-405 corridor. Polciy.U-100: The proposed site modification will not produce adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The site is.essentially built expect for the replacement of a taller monopole. The adjacent industrial land uses will not be adversely impacted by this site modification. The environment will not be impacted by this unmanned,silent,antenna support structure. Policy U-101: Sprint Spectrum's policy is to collocate whenever possible. This modification is being requested as there are no collocatable structures with sufficient height in the near vicinity. The structure being proposed will support collocation and Sprint Spectrum and the landowner welcome collocation by other carriers. 4-38-13: Additional Permit Review Criteria All additional permit review criteria will be met. The antenna height will exceed the top of the monopole by approximately three(3)feet. The existing character of the neighborhood will not be impacted by the modification being proposed. Existing vegetation will be preserved to provide a screen for views of the site. from the railyard to the west. A landscaping .waiver is being requested as preexisting built environment and vegetation provide necessary screening and additional landscaping would not add screening. All sides of the site will be screened by existing buildings, vegetation, or fencing. All on site equipment is manufactured painted and,already is existing at the site. The only sound this facility creates is from a small cooling fan in the radio cabinet..The sound level is the equivalent of a domestic fan. No new fencing is being installed as part of this modification. The tower will not be artificially light unless required by the FAA. No advertising will be affixed to any part of the facility. Like any other structure, this monopole is designed to be structurally sound and meet all engineering requirements. The proposed monopole is designed to withstand 87 mph wind with 1"radial ice. Sprint Spectrum: Sprint Spectrum is a partnership of Sprint Corporation, Telecommunications Inc. (TCI), Cox Communications and Comcast Corporation. It was formed.in 1994 to develop and provide nationwide Personal Communications Services(PCS)over a wireless network. In March, 1995, Sprint Spectrum obtained licenses from the Federal Communications Commission for the Seattle Major Trading Area and 28 other markets throughout the United States to develop this network. The Seattle Major Trading Areas includes the western two-thirds of the State of Washington. . Page S.A.S.aS .A Fluid Power/City of Renton 8/8/97/RENT 006-04 The Service: PCS is an abbreviation for "Personal Communications Services", the newest innovation in wireless communications technology. PCS offers a unique combination of telecommunications services including small compact wireless phones,pagers,caller ID,notepad size computers with wireless modems,fax machines and an array of other customized mobile equipment. PCS services differs from existing cellular services in a number of ways. PCS systems are smaller, lighter, and transmit at higher frequencies with less power than cellular. PCS utilizes 100% digital technology that produces a higher quality transfer of voice and data than the older analog/digital hybrid systems currently being used by cellular companies. PCS offers a new service in a competitive marketplace with security, excellent voice quality and low subscriber rates. The Sprint.Spectrum network has been specifically designed for people- for the convenience of everyday use anywhere,anytime. The System: Similar to cellular systems,PCS consists of a network of base station sites located throughout the intended service area which transmit and receive radio signals. These base stations each transmit the radio signals in the frequency bands between 1850 and 1970 MHz at a very low power(less than 200 watts total). As a customers move throughout the system using their equipment, the call is passed from one base station to another. Each base station site will have self-contained cabinets of radio equipment and antenna arrays. The radio cabinet dimensions,are approximately 6 feet in height and 30 inches square. The equipment will be served by standard commercial power and telephone service. Public Benefit: Wireless communications services are being utilized throughout the country by emergency service providers, public utilities and maintenance companies, and for mobile commercial purposes. A growing number of people are discovering the convenience and safety of utilizing wireless phones and pagers. Sprint Spectrum's PCS system combines paging and short messaging with a portable phone. Wireless services are valued in emergency situations. For example, 'in the recent regional windstorm, with many phone and power lines down, wireless services provided communication links to ensure safety and assistance where needed. In addition, wireless subscribers have reported countless auto accidents and disabled vehicles, emergency conditions, crime or drunk drivers. Site Selection: The need for new base station sites, including modifications, is dictated by capacity and radio coverage requirements. Once the need for a new PCS site in a particular service area has been established, Sprint Spectrum's engineers identify a target district in which to locate a facility. Within the target district, the selection of a specific PCS site location is determined by local topographic and geographic factors, mitigation of the facilities visual impact, compatibility with existing land use and the ability to negotiate a contract with a willing landlord. Page 5 S.A.S.Fluid Power/City of Renton 8/8/97/RENT 006-04 The height of the antenna array is determined by local topographical factors such as ground elevation, tree canopy, buildings in the area, mountains, and the height of neighboring base stations. A radio signal must travel unobstructed to be effective. The customer's handset needs to"see"an antenna. The more directly the antenna"sees"the user,the clearer the signal. Community Impact: Typical communications facilities consist of computerized radio equipment. These facilities are unmanned and inaccessible to the public. PCS facilities operate at a high frequency with very low power. Radio frequency energy has existed since the beginning of time. The sun emits energy that registers on the frequency spectrum, warm bodies emit energy, and energy is used as electricity. In fact,an environment free of radio frequency would be dark,cold and silent. The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) has established a standard for safe levels of radio frequency energy. These standards are designed for 24-hour-per-day, lifetime exposure from conception on. Thus, they are designed to apply to all: the unborn, young, old, sick, well. The world's body of scientific literature is considered in the development of the safety standards. Currently, there are over 10,000 such reports. There are over 100 experts working on the committees continuing to evaluate the biological effects of radio frequency energy and electromagnetic fields. "Under the most conservative assumptions of any scientifically recognized standard, the electromagnetic fields associated with PCS base station antennas are many times below the levels associated with adverse effect, and many times below the safety standards that have been recommended by the experts in the various published standards."* For example, a PCS base station with 12 sector antennas operating at full power is 0.0015% of the maximum official standard for the spectrum used. In view of the above research,a PCS base station facility will not cause adverse health effects to people in the area,either now or in the future.* * Excerpts from Health Safety Report on Electromagnetic Fields from Personal Communications System(PCS)Base Station Antennas,Thomas S.Ely,MD. 12/95. Interference: Communications facilities have been designed to meet the fullest FCC standards. The FCC issues operating licenses in separate frequency bands to prevent interference. Sprint Spectrum is authorized to use the PCS Block, an allocation with handsets transmitting in the 1850-1865 MHz range and base stations transmitting in the 1930-1970 MHz range. Below is an example of the types of frequency spectrum users: AM Radio: 540-1600 kHz FM Radio: 88-108 MHz TV Stations: 54-806 MHz Cellular and ESMR: 800-900 MHz Cable TV: 50-500 MHz PCS: 1850-1970 MHz Page 6 S.A.S.Fluid Power/City of Renton 8/8/97/RENT 006-04 Transmitting and receiving equipment of all kinds in manufactured according to the assigned FCC frequencies. As a result, Sprint Spectrum is not allowed to transmit a signal that could be received by a radio or television set,or other electronic equipment. PCS base stations operate at very low power levels (200 watts or less). In contrast, other broadcast stations, such as AM/FM radio or TV, operate at up to 5 million watts. Most electronic equipment is designed with electronic shielding to prevent undesirable radio signals from being picked up by other electronic circuitry. There should not be any problem of interference from properly shielded, maintained and operated equipment. In the unlikely event of interference, caused by its PCS system, Sprint Spectrum would take what ever actions necessary to eliminate the problem. Summary: In summary, Sprint Spectrum's facility will fulfill a daily need for wireless communication in the Renton area, providing dependable communication links for business, safety and productivity. The PCS services that the proposed use provides are a public benefit offering families businesses increased communication options and emergency services at a lower cost while minimizing the impact on the neighborhood. Sprint Spectrum is pleased to have the opportunity to develop its regional PCS network in the City of Renton. We look forward to being good corporate neighbors and members of the community. I hope that this letter will provide some insight into Personal Communication Systems and Sprint Spectrum. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at (425)602.2310 or(206)602.2000. Sincerely, Tom Paine Property Specialist Sprint Spectrum Attachments Page 7 S.A.S.Fluid Power/City of Renton 8/8/97/RENT 006-04 Justification for Administrative Conditional Use Permit Request: The proposed PCS base station modification is consistent with the goals of the City of Renton's Wireless Communication Ordinance. Goal 1: The proposal is to modify an existing PCS base station located in an IH- Industrial Heavy zone. The neighborhood is industrial in nature and all adjacent property is zoned I-H. The modified monopole will be designed to accommodate collocation potentially minimizing the need for additional towers in the area. Goal 2: The modified monopole will strongly encourage the joint use of the site. The additional height would allow for the collocation of other wireless carriers. The modified monopole will be designed to structurally accommodate additional wireless carriers. The existing monopole does not provide adequate height to promote collocation. Goal 3: The proposed modification is located where adverse impact on the community is minimal. The new monopole will replace an existing monopole in an industrial neighborhood. Industrial land uses typically involve the widest allowed community environmental impacts, including noise, dust, and the operation of • heavy equipment. The proposed use has none of these characteristic industrial impacts. Goal 4: The proposed modification will be configured to minimize adverse visual impact. The new monopole will allow for collocation, thus minimizing adverse visual impact by reducing the need for additional monopoles. The new monopole will be matte finished to minimize any glare and promote blending with natural sky. Goal 5: Approval of the Administrative Conditional Use Permit for the modification of this PCS base station enhances the ability of the providers of telecommunications service to provide such services to the community quickly, effectively, and efficiently. The modification will improve Sprint Spectrum's ability to more effectively provide the City of Renton with the best digital wireless communication technology available today. 4-38-14: Conditional Use Permit Review Criteria 1. The height of the proposed modification to the existing Sprint Spectrum PCS Wireless Facility is 140'. 2. The nearest residential boundary is across I-405 approximately .5 miles from the proposed modification location. 3. The site is located in an IH-Industrial Heavy zone. The surrounding land uses are industrial. The adjacent properties on all four sides are industrial. Industrial land uses typically involve the widest allowed environmental impacts, including noise, dust, and the operation of heavy equipment. The proposed modification to the existing PCS facility poses none of these characteristic industrial impacts. Additionally, there is an existing analog cellular monopole on the property directly to the north of the site. 4. The site is screened by a hillside that slopes down from I-405 and a ramp that leads to I- 405. 5. The site is screened to the west by a blackberry bush covered fence and numerous blackberry bushes in the adjacent railyard. There are trees north of the I-405 access ramp that screen the site to the north. 6. The support structure is a monopole. Monopoles are designed to be visually less obtrusive than lattice or guyed structures. The modified height,w li 1l wyfor collocation 'bi 8 139 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON I by other carriers, effectively reducing visual obtrusiveness by reducing the need for an additional structure in the area. The mat finish will minimize glare to reduce visual obtrusiveness. 7. No additional ingress and egress will result from this site modification except for during the two week construction period. Contractors will use existing access. Maintenance visits to the unmanned facility will occur approximately once a month after construction completion. 8. There will be some traffic and noise during the two-week construction period. The finished site produces no noise expect for cooling fans in the radio cabinets. The fan noise is equivalent to the sound of a domestic fan at the nearest property line. 9. The existing 70' Sprint PCS monopole II facility is too short to provide the necessary radio coverage. A taller support structure is needed to adequately serve the nearby Renton area and connect with adjacent cells. The existing 120' US West monopole is also too short to offer collocation possibilities at this location for Sprint PCS. The highest Sprint PCS could locate would be 100' and 140' is necessary. There are no other collocatable facilities in the near vicinity that are tall enough to meet the required height. Consistency With Utilities Element of Comprehensive Plan Policy U-5: Sprint Spectrum is seeking to modify an existing PCS facility. The impact of the modification is,minimal as this is an'existing site in an industrial neighborhood. All adjacent properties are industrial and the adjacent property to the north is the site of an existing US West monopole. The construction of the site will take approximately two weeks and produce minimal impacts. A small amount of traffic and noise will occur during construction. During normal operations the site will produce no impacts on adjacent land uses. Per the lease, the site will be dismantled within 6 months once no longer in use. Policy U-10: The modified monopole will be constructed within the same lease area as the existing Sprint Spectrum PCS facility. The 50' x 20' site is located in the back northwest corner of the parcel. The above ground facilities are shielded to the railyard to the west by a blackberry bush covered fence. To the north and south the above ground facilities are screened by existing industrial buildings. To the east the site is screened by existing on site utilities and the slope up to I-405. The area to the immediate east of the lease area needs to remain undeveloped to accommodate.the groundspace needs of additional carriers wishing to collocate on the proposed monopole. Policy U-30: The modification is being requested as the existing monopole does not provide the desired radio coverage from this location. Like the existing support structure, the new structure will be a monopole which is designed to be more aesthetically pleasing than a guyed or lattice tower. Once the new monopole is constructed the existing structure will be dismantled. The service area of this site is mainly the City of Renton between Rainier Avenue South and I-405. 'The additional height is required to provide line of site radio signal transmission along the nearby section of the I-405 corridor. Polciy U-100: The proposed site modification will not .produce adverse impacts on the environment and adjacent land uses. The site is essentially built expect for the replacement of a taller monopole. The adjacent industrial land uses will not be adversely impacted by this site modification. The environment will not be impacted by this unmanned, silent,antenna support structure. Policy U-101: Sprint Spectrum's policy is to collocate whenever possible. This modification is being requested as there are no collocatable structures with sufficient height in the near vicinity. The structure being proposed will support collocation and Sprint Spectrum and the landowner welcome collocation by other carriers. 4-38-13: Additional Permit Review Criteria All additional permit review criteria will be met. The antenna height will exceed the top of the monopole by approximately three(3)feet. The existing character of the neighborhood will not be impacted by the modification being proposed. Existing vegetation will be preserved to provide a screen for views of the site from the railyard to the west. A landscaping waiver is being requested as preexisting built environment and vegetation provide necessary screening and additional landscaping would not add screening. All sides of the site will be screened by existing buildings, vegetation, or fencing. All on site equipment is manufactured painted and already is existing at the site. The only sound this facility creates is from a small cooling fan in the radio cabinet. The sound level is the equivalent of a domestic fan. No new fencing is being installed as part of this modification. The tower will not be artificially light unless required by the FAA. ' No advertising will be affixed to any part of the facility. Like any other structure, this monopole is designed to be structurally sound and meet all engineering requirements. The.proposed monopole is designed to withstand 87 mph wind with 1"radial ice. I , City of Renton Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Name of Proposal: Sprint Spectrum Wireless Personal Communications Services--(PCS) Base Station Facility SAS Fluid Power located at 919 Hauser Way, Renton (RENT 006-07). 2. Applicant: Sprint Spectrum 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person Sprint Spectrum Tom Paine 11000 NE 33'Place, Suite 200RECE Wf Bellevue, WA 98004 (425)602-2000 -' x;° 139 4. Date Checklist Prepared: oEvELcPR. N e PLANNING August 5, 1997. CI OF RENTON 5. Agency Requesting Checklist: City of Renton. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (include phasing, if applicable): Applicant will begin construction as soon as necessary after permits and approvals are obtained. The construction will take two (2) weeks to complete. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. None. Sprint Spectrum does not anticipate any future expansion. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: None known. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 1) City of Renton Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Building Permit. 2) Sprint Spectrum has been licensed by the Federal Communications Commission to transmit Personal Communications Services in the Seattle Major Trading Area. 3) Sprint Spectrum has applied to the Federal Aviation Administration for approval on proposed tower height and location to assure no interference with airplane landing paths. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the site of the project. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project. description.). Sprint Spectrum proposes to replace a monopole at an existing wireless Personal Communication Services (PCS) base station on the SAS Fluid Power Company property, at 919 Hauser Way North, Renton, WA 98055. The SAS Fluid Power Building, an industrial structure, occupies the property. The PCS base station consist of a monopole with an antenna mounting platform at the top tall (overall height 140 feet). The platform has three sides, facing north, southeast and southwest. Each face will have four antennas, approximately 64 inches tall, 6 inches wide and 2 inches deep. One Global Positioning System ("GPS") antenna disk (2 inches tall by 4 inches in diameter), used for timing purposes, will be mounted on the monopole. Five self-contained equipment cabinets are located near the base of the monopole. Each cabinet is 6 feet tall and 30 inches square. The total land area devoted to this PCS base station is 1000 square feet. The facility transmits radio signals in the 1850-1970 Megahertz range, and operates at very low power levels (less than 200 watts). The unmanned PCS base station operates 24 hours a day. Please see the attached site plans. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed.project, including a street address, if any. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The PCS base station is located at the northwest corner of the property subjectlocated at' 919 Hauser Way North, Renton, WA 98055 Vicinity Map: See attached submission drawings. Site Plan: See attached submission drawings. Legal Description: See attached "Exhibit A". Section 05, Township 23, Range 5. Site Area: Site Dimensions: Total .973 acres or 42,400 sq. ft. Total 205' x 193' Project .02 acres or 1000 sq. ft. Project 20' x 50' B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a) General description of the site: Flat. b) What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? This site has 0% slope. Page 2 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/S/97/RENT-006.07 c) What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Clay and Sandy Loam. d) Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. There are no surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity. e) Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There would be approximately 100 cubic yards of grading for the proposal, in order to create cement footing for the monopole. fj Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe: No. g) About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The total existing site is covered with impervious surface, there would be no change in the existing amount of impervious surface after project construction. h) Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. None are anticipated to be necessary. 2. AIR a) What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction there will be negligible vehicle exhaust emissions. The completed project would have no emissions. b) Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. None are anticipated to be necessary. Page 3 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/5/97/RENT-006-07 3. WATER a) Surface 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? .If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None affecting the project. 2. Will the project require any work in or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. The proposal requires no filling or dredging of materials placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. The proposal requires no surface water withdrawals or diversions. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. The proposal is not affected by a 100-year flood plain. 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. The proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. b) Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No ground water will be withdrawn, and no water will be discharged to ground water. 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any. For example: Domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals...agricultural; etc. Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served if applicable, or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. No waste material is produced by this proposal. The proposed radio telecommunications facility is unmanned. No water or domestic sewage disposal is required for this facility. Page 4 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/5/97/RENT-006-07 c) Water Runoff(including storm water): 1. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. No. The proposed facility will not generate additional water runoff. Water run off remains unchanged as there is no change in the amount of impervious surface. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? Not applicable as the proposed facility will not generate waste materials. d) Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. No measures are proposed to reduce the negligible surface, ground, and runoff water impacts. 4. PLANTS a) Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other, _evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs _grass pasture _crop or grain _wet soil plants: Cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other _water plants: Water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b) What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. The projected site is located on impervious surface c) List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered species known. d) Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Not applicable. 5. ANIMALS a) Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Songbirds. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None. b) List any threatened or endangered animal species known to be on or near the site: None known. Page g SAS Fluid Powc/Renton 8/5/97/RENT-006.07 c) Is the site part of a migration route (bird, mammal or fish)? If so, explain. None known. d) Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None are anticipated to be necessary. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a) What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? The Sprint Spectrum facility will use electricity to run electronic radio equipment. Telephone service will also be required. b) Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. The proposed facility will not add additional height or bulk that would affect the potential use of solar energy. c) What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. None are anticipated to be necessary as energy impacts are negligible. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a) Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. Typical wireless PCS telecommunications facilities consist of computerized radio equipment. The facilities are unmanned and do not emit any known health hazards, toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, or hazardous materials. i) Describe special emergency services that might be required. The proposal would not require any special emergency services. ii) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None are anticipated to be necessary as there are not environmental health hazards associated with this project. b) Noise i) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project, (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. No noise, from traffic, equipment or operations, exists that would affect this proposal. Page 6 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/5/97/RENT-006-07 ii) What types of levels would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (i.e., traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be some traffic noise associated with the installation and placement of the antennas and equipment. Such noise would only occur during the two (2) week construction period. The proposed development generates no noise other than the sound from fans and/or heat exchanging equipment mounted inside the equipment cabinets. Fan noise is equivalent to the sound of a domestic fan at the nearest property line. iii) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: No measures are needed to reduce or control noise as there is no adverse noise impact associated with this project. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a) What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site: Industrial facility. Adjacent Properties: North: Commercial. South: Vacant lot. East: Hauser Way/I-405. West: Burlington Northern Railroad. b) Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Unknown. c) Describe any structures on the site. The site currently has a one-story industrial structure. The existing structure is 11,200 sq. ft. d) Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No structures will be demolished. e) What is the current zoning classification of the site? The current zoning classification of the site is IH—Industrial Heavy. f) What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The current comprehensive plan designation of the site is Employment Area-- Industrial. g) If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h) Has any part of the site been classified as.an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No part of the site has been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area. III Page 7 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/5/97/RENT-006-07 i) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The site is unmanned. One employee will provide maintenance services once per month. j) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. There are no displacement impacts associated with this project. 1) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land use and plans, if any. The proposed project is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. The site is currently zoned IH—Industrial Heavy. The proposed use is permitted with an Administrative Conditional Use Permit and Environmental Checklist. The small scale of the project (1000 square feet total surface area) allows the project to easily integrate into the existing property, as well as the surrounding commercial and industrial uses. The property is designated as Employment Area-Industrial in the City of Renton Comprehensive Plan. The proposal provides infrastructure that is necessary for commercial enterprises to compete in the business marketplace. The antenna arrays will be painted a neutral color to blend with the surrounding environment. 9. HOUSING a) Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? None. b) Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are anticipated to be necessary. 10. AESTHETICS a) What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. The steel antenna monopole is 140 feet . The antennas, to be mounted on the steel mounting platform, are fiberglass. The exterior materials of the self- contained equipment cabinets are steel. The facility will be surrounded by a chain-link fence. b) What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? No views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None are anticipated to be necessary. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a) What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? No light. Glare will be minimized by pole finish. Page 8 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/5/97/RENr-006-07 b) Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? • No. The monopole is painted a matte-fmish to avoid the glaring effect of any shiny surface. The proposed modification will not be a safety hazard nor interfere with views. c) What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No existing off-site sources of light or glare would affect this proposal. d) Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. None are anticipated to be necessary. 12. RECREATION a) What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None. b) Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The proposed project will not displace any existing recreational uses. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None are anticipated to be necessary. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a) Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? None known. b) Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. None are anticipated to be necessary. 14. TRANSPORTATION a) Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Public streets and highways servicing the site are I-405, Park Avenue, and Hauser Way. (See attached site plan, part of submission drawings.) b) Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The site is currently serviced by Metro Transit, however, public transit is not applicable to this proposal. Page 9 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/5/97/RENT-006-07 c) How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Routine maintenance visits will utilize existing site parking without adverse impacts. No parking spaces will be eliminated. d) Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new streets or roads will be necessary. Access to the site is provided by existing streets. e) Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f) How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. One vehicle trip per month will be made for routine maintenance of the facility. g) Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None are anticipated to be necessary. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in an increased need for public services (i.e., fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. The project consists of transmitting and receiving antennas and self- contained equipment cabinets. The site will be inaccessible to the general public. The cabinets contain alarms and 24 hour monitoring equipment for additional security. There are no employees on site, so there will be no increased need for public health and social services. b) Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None are anticipated to be necessary. Page 10 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/5/97/RENT-006-07 16. UTILITIES a) Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, telephone, refuse service, sanitary sewer, septic systems. While the above utilities serve the site, only electrical, gas and telephone service will be required. b) Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general utility construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electrical: Puget Sound Energy. Telephone: US West Communications. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration on non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Proponent: Name Printed: is TDM (?AJ r l ►Date: 8 Page 11 SAS Fluid Power/Renton 8/5/97/RENT-006-07 4-38-5: Submittal Requirements D. Inventory of Existing Sites. This is the only wholly owned Sprint PCS support structure within the city limits of Renton. Sprint PCS operates two additional facilities on existing structures in Renton. The addresses of the neighboring facilities in Renton are: Evergreen Building 15 South Grady Way Renton,WA 98055 City of Renton Water Tank 3410 NE 121 Street Renton,WA 98056 RECEIVED AUG . 8 1997 DEVEL0PMt'N i PLANNING CITY OF RENTON I , 4-38-5: Submittal Requirements A. Map of View Area Narrative I The view area map was derived by overlaying City of Renton Comprehensive Land Use Map with a USGS topographic map. While this tool can give a best guess at where the facility may be visible from, the photo simulations provide a better example of the actual visual impact. To be able to see the facility from everywhere depicted on the view area map a person would need to be elevated higher than any nearby built or natural environment to have any possibility of noticing the facility. Anyone not located in the immediate vicinity (i.e. a person downtown) would not likely be able to see the facility. The location allows views of the facility to be shielded by I-405 and the existing nearby industrial neighborhood.,' A good example of the unobtrusiveness of this facility is depicted in photosimulation #1 which was taken approximately one mile from the facility. From the location of photosim #1 it is difficult to locate the existing US West monopole which is similar in size to the proposed Sprint PCS monopole modification. 11. CITY I , ... .... !■.u. 3 I v I I L.-E ILA T LA--S CITY 01-- RENTON ....... 40 A Af 0 F." V I U3 . N(LE Pr 1111111111' V:I Ey.) Pi(LEPt • Comprehensive Land Use Map 1 _ • 5 E A)Figizilet-lv r--- 1 i .,,,. ..„, -,,,,, , _:::E::::::H.,•:_-::::::::: K.:::,. Zip. 'Nil ! , s 0\_...:E.Egs:-_--_--_--_--_--_-_-_-_-_-.4 -a, 1 1 rt-f :-::.!!_::: I:E:::E::E1-E-,:::' I P-3,:1[1!uI:::-:-- ,. bl 1•• '. ...."-....".."X- .A.FrE: i ; bildikiF .fj ..j illtiT );....L') , r, iiiEiEEEEEE•2:-.-sitE:::::„73::: v 1 ..,, 5 ......, • 77.4 , lip.-.-.-:.,,.ciVi: [ L''%-. %/ / -7.:- • ILI Nil ,t IP IF 24.5,..:„.._:...„..::::::::::::., y, in. 1,. .iar,,... .i ________,..___. k --:-:-7.-7.-.:- ( CA - .. A ",? -::-:::-:-::.:-.::.--.:-.:-:.-:-.:-:.-- , •Ai.!..1 , 1. .'"--I=• ••1'AI 1 '. ,44 E !':54.1:. t 1 /g.--EE-EE:.::f.lf.:1E-E::-- \ , . / LI I-- . / ••/"--I 1 , 1....., 7-jpr fl! /_..--1...,_5-z_::;::". ::_.-1. „:5::-- 1 !,,,IA11:1 I. ,:a..., 1 A • lb:, ,t___- ..::0REL. ,.,..6,, 1 -::::KcE:::.:E:E:gE.:ErK:E:.:.:.--_-:K_:EEEEEEK:KtE::.:-:-. -01 _i.,-,. •;,... ,. ......::5_,Em.:::::::::::•{1::::-. - :::::-:-:-:-:-:::::::-::::::::::::::-.:_:_:_x_x_:_:_-_-_:_::::: , Inli, 1 ., 01..- , •A*1110.:, :NA.. •,-----A. ' , .-..„ .....„- , )..:-.-±-4-.:::„:„.:_:::::_x_:-_-, ,, ,- . - ..-J.------ -, ,...._ •<: i - ,_. ' .. K.-.E:K.:::.:E:E:::::::::_ P --:-:•-•:::::•::::7-:::::::: :::::::;:-:'-:.-:-.f.:••LS:::::, '' . • .,•=1,-,• __:EitigggEiE.:E:E:EE•i7E.::::_if:C- z._/__Al .II•-) W..-.E._•_:iiE.--.:••.:•:':_E_E.EEE:.'EHEiE::__ : 1 r ,\...• ,,,,r • (.' ....,-4,..,. .. ., It-litsi-_,::::-:::::::-:::11::E:li:s.1::.:._:,_:_:,,,,,_ .--• 0,,,„ )„.i. P §.7;.g.'ngF-.K&I.Y.r.TOR ;.'F.PE2K -25.T.m--f.g§ff.f v IgitA107,p ,,11r, ....vvfr. , In r= , . . \'''\'‘ ---- ::-- --'-----''.-:":":":":":":":-7,:.::::::':"::::::::::::::::::::::::-,:-.:::::::-:-:-:-:-:-7.---:-7.-:.-.:-: -- •, • '1 --... . ',..*i L ..... ...V IL\ :-"-f----•:7i:2":..7.'7:...2.;:::.. .-i•_:-::.*:_:-.-:.::.i.".a.:: :-::------- -_---St:tfgkEig3MSss ‘. 1-7:'.2.t, il -----.:-:- -.7----.:-------:-::::::_:::_:..:_:__ k . . • I -1 I ••,, I 1 ••1:11.-1. • \---.7.••-•K•7••:•:::.:K:.:•-_:::::;•-:K=.7..i.:•E:':.:•E:••:::::•E::•:::_:•:"-• :•:::::50.::-:::::::::::::::::::::::',15.:-_ `I WE. -... \_.- , ' IN Fij ill ;\77:::ii•:•]•:•:..-EiEE•ME•-:•5:1:._:::J.E;V:::---- ---------u--'-.-------.1.-,•1-:-z--=.,-_-,..-_-_-_-_-_-_ ' 1 _-•:- . .6•:,:-:tekariOr.ja3M-------------------V In ,c, \ -TT . •._ i irmlii 4-) . ::E-E:E3-.1. --ii,Y1 f.m..4.7.!:4.11:Awiliiii_i_44k.,.. ::;::,. I _1.,_ I.ii Lit-, 1 - 1101 III I' -:\,.:-::::•E:1::- ...... ..4.i.*.iiEEKl. .?-Ha.i. ;?-,6e--.....-f?tK;'•?:tilt.fgA_ tj j, itlikt,11161, '4"' --:-:-:-:.::---:-:-:"::.-- -E..---------------;:::",'..:-:-;;;;:1;;;;Z_A Iiii• PRI i •m 1'e•E RIP a Pi . ..:.- .%\----t:ZE:::::::::::E.g.S:KE:E:Ef-:-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-:-:-:-_-‘ ,.II1i to•.. mi., j_..„.-L,- -.-.-- .4 --: . _: ..\\.• '10 Iff Y.; ' • • • -**i. ', .,,.N1 44 , . .0-ep.,..,,,,/•_ .. .! . 'Ikiii\. .L ' - I. ''''• i i '"'• i 'I r!kik. II NI, $$0,,`"'N,Iii k.,\•s----::::::•-•:§:------:-:•-•:-.X.-.:-.7-•3.7:•:::::Uff.::::::•::::::::•::Eft-1..- .;!:ti r Elii 1 t i,.,"::, WV1.1. - N, :•_,,,----.---"'--4-3- N.. -'10 W I,"It ': '0.7A I\ ,t.gliiilie'414C---:::::::::::::-:-:-:-:-.7-.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.: ....---- ',It! u..,,•. , , .1 . .-j* • 6 i AM 'r. •f A.4Ak -.74.IWK.:::::::."..-5.E.:Ef-_.--E-::::.-Z-f.:::.:::::::::::::::::--.,,,r4 ..; . ' '1 .. .IP IR!. 14111111,4 i it . • no ih. . . - \ '6'.. ' • -1.45 o',-.14.- 1,•„,. ...,--:::,7.7::::.-.7Kf?..-:-..3.,---T.-',:::.;::.::::.:z.ff-..;,.40r,•-,.. -- 10";'111 Ogg Ili 16/ Rana 'S i ,. ' lf---. fl . '...1 ik tttratimionn.••\--'1....?.:..' .•,- ....--, ,,p);.ivoiv..',,,...„ `AL• ---.' -'11'I 1:11i' I•...,il I el 101 s.,0 ' ' . .6 Orstrwillklir R.‘ • •.''''' '••'..V,*• ;*;i.V'''r A l' -I•I"IIIII''114111 4'19 "••11"••• • u • •.7' I ';'•.'' ...'Stir;• •‘.. '••-:•.,a("-,,t; , Willi il!,16......!!ill;,s;.;),?!.!:ii 'Ikil I pil.,.,t,„ c[k:d __.4 _.• I - •,... . Th„.„, .. _,.__ .tii .• III ,At ,„ 7,54,6 - •ME' ii'.111 f,•',.,..•:••• :.,1•:.,..:ii**•1•:',10A;Z..0•:•',.•:•1. ':. ThIlli'„'"!!'!.:"" ''''4.1111C1; '••1•!1••:••••1 __- _,- ....._...._... ._... ,_ .."'!•• al•-•01M-*Ift 'Nu - -III.• mi--11 : •..li' ::i '.:ig;!•'•*.i.:.:.•".'..".•7:%•14.•A;'.. Iii:Le,.-,...4111,11,1 p Pi, 'lig r7-27. • , . . 7, ',. - 1- -.17,,37411,.• -.-.--.7, :.,•. 4 - itrm- 'Op riA 10.Plist...0.:':•':'''F.0.% 0411100 12-101- • ‘1. __MIN .: .e...._.3... . , . _ • ..., ‘• ' --.:, to A 11 "--II • • *.':':•:I!'.'.!::: •.$":',:•4•4,*Ill`' 1$$'!.i•''••.0'1', --I 7.11111.,..r11,1 . . . .. . • . ' 1111..itt. ,.' 4 i ;_;t7.1 rill rai..!:".!;:;.'::.`...;.•• .7•":.flii;ek ir;;;Iiii;:\4i-411:4PriiI767 'MI1;1..•: .1';''r i I '' . - \ \ P ' i'd, '\\ ••14till "ili:7-1•3trillZ:"Ii:gf:•t.TI*1‘3...:' -lip iril. &Val! \•; 4r1-'14' A (9,iii:I.,'itiTIT4:.-11tH''lli.Oi: 1 V ) II I A"' t- ••---J 11 e''Iii•I ati: Ag•4• I f't,31 iTfii;,,i;;;";111 .',I'I,.,.;;- 1*1.-.7.7.,„,,•,,,,I" • . h-••••••••41:1- ' .1:i::: • ,- Ill fi • ., i L-• 1. 1 or----71 ----- --.---"---. -=_ \ *V: toist, 7 k_. ."P ., 1 'N11.:Ngi,1411-1.1111.1...t,iiiiipAli.i. 0,111131r 41:1'j!..:::ji:!i:!1:4111111 .11.114111J III' ,111111111D.IT; ( II . i ...,, , . --.....-.... --A . lit; 1 -. i'd,p.. ...•.!;I:i. ' Itliliiititilfol. .,,:iii.,-„,,J.,' .--..- .. ... ,..„...z„,... .. _. _. -.. -*, . . • ,...,.!! ;.!!!,,,,,•,•„....., 4,-.)/11,10,,,,,: .1)/ ,....: i 'I ••L'i g 1 ,),, s •.• . . iiii:, r ,1111 ;.. , .‘,„ .h- . . • . • • I: III% I . . ' • Ar ,. ill?11 g.„ IIL ...,,,, w•-......-4. KJ 1 -'• ,•141I'litir-MINH Iff4r-1,7-At L'IT6P1 i.„. • • • . . . .. . , . • _, I II i 7 .. 111. I es.t 1 '• 4 .00\te... ., ,i I'. iiil • ir ‘,, i: . ''----------- \.::..':.;,...i' ,,\ -----4„...,,,,,,,,,' ,.If • , •.11114:1,,:.... -.TO!, , 1 1. • .. i$ ' glINIIIIII14au. II ...,1 • ..• vel. \' \. staiiir' ,iii•1;411,1:414 dif . • ii \t- . .._.... --- -- -,-- • ... • ...L ' !Vilflit kAN. il pi r---.....1 I-, O.I . .• ..... ,.1 . -_ ••• ...._....., [I- , I.';%..if•:.c.. '••• - , 4 . .. R z. ...,,L.,.-",..„,y,j..!:i.v.,. .„ 1:,. 4,...,".;10,111111'liii!i, '''... tv - 141 . • 4 '''.14''''''''' . \‘i-'' , _ 1 .„--....„.. / Lt...-.' . ., I -2.....:•_JI ! i ' 4 . LI: i-'titi.- '.4-4---4 ..,_j..".• .-,i.4 i • . I . •,,-., ; t 1 11 K. • ••::.?.:,,,r,, ,-,;!,i,c. n'' ..n4n-...-.1.lia 1011°114T._ .411iiiiIiiii.,,,i,. :15s54A.4.,kozizcze• ..1"7-. .No.,b, .7. \ -• • . or%...6ii...10, • ;. -.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,L., ...,...v1.,, ,---,'- •-i_, i, '.--J ./...--\\; -,4:34.,4" 111,,,,,...:...:!!,•,:.. . , 'A....11.*111'TY ,.-7,#!%`1. / C' -:.1. '' : 17 b -• - -. ii Ir..' ) ‘' ''''''.'''::..- " - • . .diAli I fle .. - 1 , t ' ,,,c- '- 13-0, ' 41 • I. _'2.7-:-.•zz..:::%. a -,, •-•) •,.•p•.,>--,-. . . , ,..: .,'.::49i., .. .-; 'mo, , :101/410. : •-,-, '.7,.:%-,,,:-.-....:••,.%?.....•--... --.....-........ • ------ • --- ...• ___ ...-., .....::i. , -. -.. -...---..,..... .......,. . 1.,- ------.::"--------k:,..::N . - 1`‘ I n7r7i \111,k,:,W, ......• . ,: : ''•• • ii-'.,, , ... 1 , •-•• ce,....:,- _.._,,,----1\., .. ..„ •••„..7„. „........ ,1. .. r., . ----, ,,,,,,,10,1p11111! ,••,-,_ ,...z. 1.,:,,,... .- _ ,, __i ,.. . . • - . ,Er 1,•\%. ,?:!':'.Iliiii'. , ••.• , .f 1 -' ....At' .---..., !V 1 PIM • All '••\,hi„,",i,!!!!,11''• .' I . '''P . ''...; _ ,. :'_ , T b - ›. -• : Z ..,,, '•':,P.N. :' f•-i-ww' •il:Siiiiiii:::::::':!! ,- 10_-_,sza,;,/i.,,. 1217.1. --7:4, .,,` - .:_4 ._. ' I :•:',::<•.;;..'i: ;7411i " Am i •li!ii!:;.:..".:!,,, :..:..• - I • ..„... ...... ... . . . "ri ,,. ..,..„,:,. . .. . ,. •••i•1.1 )._________n \. .... !,.....i.11.,:,„,,...,,,c,..,,,,i...,„..:. .,..1,,,,,,,,t..,...,,.,.ii.i t- i4,..,. 4,,J.,.* .... ___n..._ •.iiimir iii P$0,, ' . ::..1%. Fr. , Li.),..f...., . . -:::,'.•.. ',:'.' i•I',. ' 1 '4A.- .. I ' if 1 ' A . , i ____ _ . , . , , ,04., , t 0 Al . I 1 , ..• low I wifcr i•.. s'1 --.7-.... , • . .7...11,1, , .,,-. % wi •....:`,.'4,.:'..:.:i;.:k.!..,!:•iJI.: .."..z.;:i'..;;,..,...'A.l'i , , , . . f . • .• ... • • ..-.::.... f ;.,.0.:ViAg. .,......tiii ifg' •• ••\- - r •,• ik I/ * .(1 ... ;? -„: i. • • „ i ,,•!..:, ,..,,:•,:.,. .5,m7t,n;:%?b111;i1, _.,]..-. \,,..,, 1 a.. il• -.- ..:„ir:-rAf--- : .: Li •1 .*!* i . . 1 '..il•;!;': :::i'::..fj 1.'1'.'•••?;,R...iii41.5.•ge.`.Illild . ' •' •• \ 1' 1 I 1:1:1:: 1"11'M pr. •w.-----k, 7 - op . kl 1.1iT I, .1 .iiiiiip .214"61 :1:I:i .-:„ -,•!:::,:;. -- - ) ....'•!::::!,....1, :gi'.•..i!•'!,'5•:gcr.i. Z,:•gp,,111! i.,... t ,tif olliiiiIIII:i:1:1:1:, \1•1 III 11.11, 1 (./ ,,...,::::,:•,:. ........ :,?..•,,.:,,,.,,'..':,..:D.: ..,,y,,,,c::,,,c.1 . .0,1. .i:i:. .... i,,Y.::::,::: Pr"1:40 . .:...!!!7.1!:...::.. . -• ,., ,4„,,,*(q,-$2 - > '.I. 4 '..!III•1•IIIIIFRIAIII,II I II. '•••i•••Ik''•W -:. k<4 i ••••-- • i i [.....i.;. .n. ....:,•.,,,,T -- ;ii,”:,,,1 -;.. Y plitIlii!,:i:i:!:„. .. ‘.1I,:.i..1.10:1.0!•1111.• -.. --J1 ..Kli.ii.;:i ::*; -• .L._....4 -. II! • iliiiii It Airi. _____,...J i./.1.: Illi! . ii 4 . , __ 4,..,„„„,i„ . . „,,,„, \... „,,..,, .TI, i .. ..,_ : ...........„.,.„,,,...:...„:„.,..:,...,....,:„.,....„,;.„...,, I ,.., !_..... .. ......................,...., . .._:_, _ "E DESIRE Ili ar ...,-;•,ii 1.0: 1. , L., I .... •WI• I Mr r-f•\. , '.7I•1410,..A i 1 ILI II•iIiiiiIii:I I 'rim'lh---••-1''I (''.,•741 .:- 4. <-P- - r- ! .:-:.:---- '::-:.q ,_ L. iN'iTtirfifrZi - _ ,i-i. .\ isCw•-.y.:. '. 4 .j 1,-.1' / / •4 441 I 1 ..4WV....? • 1 E I itOSig .V Stq •• • •1 • \ IC ,. .4'.001:li'.• / I . I / ; I . I I ' iliii0 .ttt I ',,. 1 I i 1 ) -----7---- -- ,„. .,:.. ..:L, , .. i .. . . . , 1 , __ .._.... .1 . . , 1 . WEN T . ...:s:::., ,,,.;'••11 I. •...• .,...'• o . MI t. • %.• i . . • . .. .. , 1111i KE•41111 , . ii . ,,, t . . ... . ... •.. • ...-_,_:_.....-.„"„:-..„.... ..„.7........:.,..,-...,11:1::::__:„... - -7/•". '!..' HADY LAE: -.:--••.-,. ar I % 1 i ,7 \ v . .,,i7,,1 .. r .„.„_-.• , , -... . .., .).„..... . ..., ._....., N'''''. to I 1 i _ I ■ II , Fit iti :::_E ..., . D . ' I ',, 1 - 111. - orft-i 1 i 1 , . . .. ..., _ ._ .,- , ,,,. ... L.__ ,._ . \. i _--41,_ •e- :..•;-:.•:•]:•::_•Eli:EEEEE:::•:::R:::::::::::::.:: . .. . . ... .. . .. • MI I I , . .66._•-, --1 -::.--_ •.r.''--1- , 511 I :WI,1!Ili't - ..:::: •• . ....., 1-1 . ...,. • • . „„,,, . ..--., • , , , • , , IL . ... ,„... :.-.7:44:;-:,.EY-Pw•cs...c-::)1•--i .:,:--_-:-.:::::„.„._::„.•:-_:_:.:.,-, - -- • .... I PI" ----4 !:-"-_ P".61r---- ' .[.- .; 1 :-..,:-":: , ' ' ' . --: • • 1 -::-.7 _,. •-•::::;*...:...---:•-•-_Es:I.:_::. r•-•-• IMIIII 1 11411 i' la-II ; „,44) • Ail , i *TIM I * . RI. • .)I .... I ;fir ri.. rt 141;401.. • -4,1,1 . .. ., • ; _. A : . ";::::••;-7 11::::::7-sq-:::::::.:::::::::' i “ i , . .. 1111,1 VT---. - A • .i .1 -I- - ..........r_....__ t14t1il 79.11}- -- ;----L-' '--- • ;L L . _ .: . .... \ i;prril IN 1 1 ii. Irv! -,-.-,- • i ., mita This document is a graphic representation, not guaranteed RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS CENTER DESIGNATIONS to survey accuracy, Intended for city purposes only and based on the best Information ovollable on of the dote shown. Residential Rural F'; :i';';' Center Neighborhood • . - . • Residential Single Family IIIIIIIIIiiii Center Suburban 3:1:111:11 Residential Options . Center Downtown:131:1::14 0 4000 8000 Residential Planned Neighborhoods 1111 Center Office Residential ::::;:.•:•:;:::;:::;:•:;:::: ;:;:;:;:;:::::::;:;:::;:::;:::::::::::::::;;;:;:::::;- . - -- Residential multi-Family Infill :: ALM Center Institution ... Adopted on 20 February 1995. ---- City Limits EMPLOYMENT AREA DESIGNATIONS ,k 0 . LONG RANGE PLANNING ,... •---- Urban Growth Boundary 1!Iiilliiiiri Employment Area - Commercial cf ,./ Sphere of Influence + P/B/PW Technical Services . Employment Area - Office +JR t/ R.MacOnie, D.Visneski ----- .• ov.Awn,,,: •-•=r',?:',•,‘ Employment Area - Industrial 7.41 ry IV 21 March 1995 --'--- - . . 4-38-5: Submittal Requirements B. Photo Simulations 9nt t,,t 1397 DEVEL _ N"r FL,INNJN CITY r RENTON G - 206-277-4455 NTON DR) SVCS/PLAN ' 979 P01 JUL 30 '97 15:18 ... ... 1 A.slo ..t... ....Q7 1 jo ..,p4. ••• • ••••:. . . / • . _ix.= .--It) ...o. - --4) 1 ad-- ._z ., • / P-1 G .. 41 ,„ : ARH-1 •• : 14t t. ." —R 8 IH PARK - • QA. • , . • , : . 1 : — • ; : t al r.. ............ .. . . . . 12th St.1.--. .ri. I AiLII" ... ,• .-_ . if R-6 1 Iv Post-it'Fax Note 7671 Dab3 7/4k91 iii:418 ,.i •a) '—• To PC*0 A C. From coiner°Al Co. 1)— t• *il -.1\ Phone# Pho v,•F". ne# S— ° / f§ \ \ . --ii 1 F 4S. % "1 .x. • ... ...:....-ENN\ .•-. @ • (T -,6 .. . . .. • ,,,I,,, \ -... v:- 3: -cs s , e" ' \ \ ••-*--..-‘,._ 1-4 # / Ili\ '.. t: \ .^.• ..t) 1 ..l....... ‘ . ./ .. t. • % % t . - e 1e IH IH %. ... ; ...- RM—I , , , , i / \ ..- , , . 1 • .%........... . 0:,...,. z cr) ...., , \ • V • .. L. SITES 0 2 . , ....... .."1 ra.. 4.3,.; 1. St.\ • en - -... . lin I IL,.11 Not 1241 --- -1 ,, IH :. ........ . . , i t_r_ . ..,• ""....... :- • -..,.. CE1 PACCAR ca KENWORTH TRUCK PLANT I • N 6thi S' 1' ..'....'-.. , . ear—. 1E.11m. ... .........fir.. ..•.: ... IR, i •.. . z s, , . • ,,, ' 1 . .. „ ., CO 6 .,, ,, ,,e'l ....,:c .. )0 . - .. . ... • ;•. . i ,,, ,, •) . • C?7': 2. , i il q-Hlt.,X;..5)„... , . . ,.. ikli. ' • iu. MU .El.r: or u Li El Imo 11 LI i,-,1 03--Q 1.1....±. 1 . ..- • v • • ? : • to Fr:1 Itai ffiq'slig:o . AC Mill 1 .... r .1. Rr• •WI a • .it ' 1 3 I A • r a _ - blebFi,r6' 4i�. ' • 't� e• ../...r-a R ■ - w { • 1 ..y1 ', a-'3 t1' .iII 4 y+yam:,;' i{ tt it IIMIIIMINIR pox . — - ...--. ROAD. a _. "' CLOSED[i -zc ;•. . rillirNIIIIIINIIM ' • • • a _, . . ,_ . . . , 1 ; _. . . --a ._z , i ROAD _ ..r ---: fir.._-*�a;�! 'i , #� „ �• •{ - ' • - ' CLOSED . " _ �2y` `o;. �,' jAI 4:411:PlIF k ._ .. . , . ; , .. ( 1 I i ... :.-- ,..... • , I i • . . . ' 1., . . .,. ,I, ' t. . . I...I.,.d: • : ,.., ' . .., ,. ' 1 /, ? . 1 I . IIII I , 3 1 i. , ,:, ,., ., , . • ' / cii . . r. 1 . II : .,,, .,,.... .',..,. ,!•,44 4 ,\:\ , 1 ' ., . . tr, t.i„ 1, • , ,,.....1°. 1 ,. . • ,d, 1 . t 1 t w , • A'4,, , 44 1 , ‘ 1 , \ 1 t ..,. ''. ', - 1 • fi i ,it - . • ' .. r ri . • .W' •• • •'t) ' ; . „ '' . ....f '..-.1 %..' \ A , . , . 41 .•,r..,4 , 1 • • '' ' '--.4's ;"'' •4\...p‘‘'", '' 41'1 iii- \\ . • , - ! . .•:- f x-7,_...-ma. '71",.:1':',... 1 :: I'll. 4.' I. • ''.' '''.:.. • . r.'-- ' -- . •'10;+ , ' 1 1 - . 4i, , r-; , ,.0-, ,;:. ,,,.,',, . • '', • N'N.41../.."'.! . . , • e:., , / 0 1, \ , ? ' ii j i. , '. 1 ...,„„.. . . .I„ . II : .41 1 : '':' *,.. .. , . .. .. 1 1 is r:, . • , . ,..t .*— . , , ... , 0:4',.,:,1. —.-1, 4 ). • '4' :4 ". 1 . .. . . .. ., i'.;..4.".' • ...,,..... .., • . . ... , , illt("kfe' : . , . ,.. ,.... • , .. ,r. ..,. i 4 , - .,, , 1r: ', ._4.. ,. .,'`-, 1 . i ,I.V. :.•.;-;.••• r. ... ',,,,.. 4* •.:,, -Irti. 1 , .. 4" 4' ....i . ,,I, , . ,, . %II t .. •,• .^.‘: :1-1-..,..--a::: AI . ,, 14N.'''.::`, ' • 4::'•c 4. N14 11, '-. .4 „ It; ' --t. '•-, .. i . ...* '' .,,4.1..:,' '..• 4P-' , • -4.4 lz. .1. ,%.:it- ..... .1„i ' • ., 1 •,,,"•• ...,tr.4c.u, : .„..•• 04:. „ ..., 41.. • ,, •ss , . z, - .. . - .! .0.-Iirti%, . . 0 • ., .' ' -.• ' '.4 .` '1.% 4. ' ir • ‘ "......"-----.."1. .' ''''-'5f0' **.:. ••• ' • Ai'..,f, ' iietlif j . • .4 ,., ,, ., ;44, : , .. ,, • . - • ,,,, . • •t. .: • ' .to 0• ,•, • I • •:•;7 4` 1. ; ..., . • , , , ,. _ •••.. 4-38-5: Submittal Requirements C. Service Area The existing Sprint PCS facility at 919 Hauser Way North does not provide adequate coverage to I-405 and to adjacent Sprint PCS facilities. Sprint PCS facilities require clear "line of sight" to adequately transmit and receive mobile telephone signals. The existing support structure is too short to provide the necessary line of sight required at this location. The modified support structure will provide the height necessary to adequately serve the immediate Renton area and nearby section of I-405. Va\N G. J�LJ aF R�\A-CO DG 0'0 rt • North Rent Coverage Predictior it 140 ft. *Newport Hills • 1r Kennydale 4 • • k. 't1 # ...' ej e' ,µ May Valley # '" � ` �.�- :4'', _``# 1 ,North.Renton *Sky\Way t, , 1k ',-iti. • i 7` ! . 4" J 'RR f 2 *'- y E I ,,k.w..4 ... 1-4 , .--tk.. _`,-..,' ,- --; .,, ,. . il . . ...„. .. .....„_, ,. ,_,_.„,...„.,,,,,,,„e---,:i:,----w•,,,,-‘ t t ,r . ( Vai a.;� � r i a' ;• /eyy f . A *Maple Wood Renton H '- • ,qp5 • N • Legend Southcenter • ■ Acceptable Signal Level • Coverage Area * Site Location SECOND AMENDMENT TO PCS SITE AGREEMENT This Second Amendment is dated this GT" day of R u st , 1997, and pertains to that PCS Site Agreement, dated June 6, 1996 and Amendment to PCS Site Agreement, dated February 25, 1997, between Ronald R. Anderson ("Owner") and Sprint Spectrum L.P., a 'Delaware limited partnership("Tenant"). RECITALS: A. The PCS Site Agreement, First Amendment to PCS Site Agreement and this Second Amendment pertains to real property located at 919 Houser Way N, Renton, WA and legally described in Exhibit A,which is attached hereto (hereinafter the"Site"). B. Owner is the owner of the Site. Tenant intends to construct and install a personal communications service system facility("PCS") on the Site,as described in the PCS Site Agreement. C. This Second Amendment to PCS Site Agreement is being entered into pursuant to paragraph 15 (d) of the Agreement. D. The parties hereto have identified several additional issues, subsequent to the execution of the PCS Site Agreement and First Amendment to PCS Site Agreement, upon which they have reached agreement and intend for this Second Amendment to reflect those understandings. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, Owner and Tenant hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. Relocation of Site: Tenant shall relocate the PCS facility. to the approximate location (50 feet by 20 feet) shown on Exhibit Al attached hereto, and made a part hereof. Exhibit Al is a sketch only, and is intended only to be a general depiction of the proposed site. Tenant shall not commence construction or installation of equipment at the new location without the prior written consent of Owner. Such consent, not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, will be considered granted when Owner and Tenant sign and date two (2) original sets of construction drawings, a copy of which shall at that time become attached hereto and made a part hereof. Initial construction and 0 installation of equipment shall only occur following the issuance of all required permits and approvals to Tenant. i) The existing Owner's trailer, including electrical and phone service shall be temporarily relocated south of the existing S.A.S. Fluid Power Building during' construction of the Site at the Tenant's sole expense. The space currently occupied by trailer, will be used for staging and access during construction. Upon completion of the PCS facility, the trailer shall be moved to its original location as shown on Exhibit Al. RECRT •" DE.VEL� ry • 3. Annual Rent: The annual rent shall be increased For the first Agreement year, Owner acknowled es recei t of rent in th ount of through June 5, 1997 and second A eement year rent totaling the period of June 6, 1997 throu June 5 9 8. U on execution of this Second Amendment, the Tenant shall pay an addition or second Agreement year rent to the Owner, in accordance with section 3 of the PCS Site Agreement. 4. Replacement of Existing Monopole: The existing Tenant monopole of 70' shall be replaced and moved with a 140' monopole per Exhibit Al. The 70' monopole will be dismantled upon completion of the 140' monopole. 5. Collocation and Removal of Equipment: The Tenant agrees to allow for the potential collocation of additional "Wireless Communications Equipment" by other providers on the Tenant's • structure or within the same Site location; and That the Tenant agrees to remove the PCS facility within six (6) months after that Site's use is discontinued or if the PCS facility falls into disrepair, and restore the Site to its pre-existing condition. Allows the Owner to enter into leases with other providers; and Specifies that if the provider fails to remove the PCS facility upon six (6) months of its discontinued use,the responsibility for removal falls upon the Owner. Except as expressly amended by this Second Amendment to PCS Site Agreement, the provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. TENANT: OWNER: SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., Ronald R.Anderson a Delaware limited partnership By: l Ted King Ronald R. Anderson Its: Director, Seattle MTA Its: Owner r Date: `iS 4 JC 1 Date: 8 ��o- 97 .01 II •G , EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the county of King, state of Washington, and described as follows: That portion of Government Lot 1, Section 8, Township 23 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of said Section 8; thence south 89°28'19" east along the south line of said northeast quarter, being also the north line of Eighth Avenue North, a distance of 391.90 feet; thence north 18°01'34" west along the westerly line of unnamed access road, a distance of 1,821.83 feet to the point of curvature of a curve to the left of radius 543.69 feet; thence northwesterly along said curve 28.75 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along aforementioned curve a distance of 62.69 feet to the end of said curve; thence tangent along a course north 27°40'34"west a distance of 132.75 feet; thence south 71°58'26"west a distance of 201.81 feet; thence south 18°01'34"east a distance of 193.0 feet; thence north 71°58'26"east a distance of 231.23 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Al NEW MONOPOLE W/ ANTENNAS FROM EXISTING CELL REMOVEDANTENNA MONOPOLE �STE — W/ MONOPOLE MAX. ANTENNA HEIGHT 140' REMOVE :.......7 EXISTING ONE STORY BULDINGIMOAOPCLS 71' 58' 26' III 201.81' A\,,s7),:\ITop — E. ►� :IS11NG PO R l EXIST. 'Ill TRAILER 1 -�—EXIST, CHAIN LINK JUNCTION BO 1 F.7. S •. /.., FENCE & GATE i v a. �:i1NDERGROLND * POWER & TELCO I, r W- EXISTING LOADING DOCK CABLES (MATCH 9 -, COST. PAVEMENT) \'A 3 l o i c EXISTING ONE STORY BUILDING . l K m` co . m N I l z ` �( �TEL00 Roots 1 1 ;-.O ` �' 140' _ 3 1 i l ti G i _ l I _ I 1 I 74. \ 1 IXI . TELEPHON POIIE — — — — N71- 58' 26' E231.23' (T\ SITE PLAN NORTH N 1- = 40—0 4 CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day of 4f451k51` , 1997,before me,the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, appeared "MA Kivtiy to me known to be 1)j Ne e,i-tic of Sprint Spectrum L.P.,the limited partnership that executed'the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day d year first above written. Oatel'cvotte_, it cat k a,ce:AwailcoP •�� t Notary Public in and for the State of A may' .%St° Ey Q - residing at King.County 9 My appointment expires: Ce/1/61 - : O «may m :J phUE3l.tC' • "jA• :"��@~ tr h . �0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that lavvjai a frtcQ ets 0A is the person who appeared before me,and said person acknowledged that said person signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be said person's free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this (p 4 day Q,t 4,,,14--- , 1997 (AFFIX NOTARIAL SEAL) (Official Nota Signature) Notary Public-State of C (J Ot4L My commission expires: , 33^jI `� 1.A L -qa (Printed,Typed or Stamped Name of Notary) Commission Number: 11 • O '�.e:,5ion.#• ® '�� Yam: AR k \( .'�G!r `040' AS North American Pole Corporation Engineering and Sales office: 5650 North Riverside Drive, Suite 104, Fort Worth, Texas 76137 P.O. Drawer 79350, Fort Worth, Texas 76179-0350 Fabrication Plant: 1607 West Commerce Street, Bldg. #105, Dallas, Texas 75208 q--7z - 1/�6 9• SPRINT RECErvED AUG 8 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF ALNTON COALFIELD SITE — RENTON, WA. 150' MONOPOLE • tnn--oze-oz. ANTENNAS I MONOPOLE REACTIONS -- - -P(IDE ANTENNA--- -ELEV:- --LINE----- - - - -- ------ --- -OVERTURN-= 3517.6 FT-K r SHEAR - 35.0K (15) AP17 - 1900 150' 1 5/8" 150'-0" I�-.---1 MAX DOWN - 32.9K (9) AP17 - 1900 130' 1 5/8" o 13 r 23.20" 0 (2) 8' DISHES 140' 1 5/8" ce „ GENERAL NOTES: 1 14 -9 L0 30.14 0 1. MONOPOLE IS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EIA/TIA-222-E: 110'-3" FOR 100 MPH. WIND AT EL. 33'. (87 MPH W/1" ICE) -' 31.75 z �� L. w Oat:: .; 2. MONOPOLE STEEL (MIN. STEEL YIELD) - 50 KSI. N- .' ,sti( II c �,p 3. CONNECTION BOLTS ARE A-325 HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS HO1. a \ 81 '-4" 36.57" �c • - .�.{',; DIP GALVANIZED) COMPLETE W/LOCK WASHERS AND HEAVY HEX NUT. • IIZ--i ,/f, % 4. MONOPOLE. AND ACCESSORIES ARE (HOT DIP GALVANIZED) o ' 76 -0 -- r =":1: ' N ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM A-123 FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL ct in Lii T r' 38.48" -4, ,,;�; 4, , l ASTM A-153 OF ASTM B-965 CLASS 65 FOR HARDWARE. ►Q o ..sioN& 5. DESIGN ASSUMES ALL TRANSMISSION LINES THROUGH THE - INSIDE OF THE MONOPOLE. o — 55'-1 1" _ L41 .16" 0 11=11119MpleAlm ' — in 50'-0" "' 43.88" 0 N CC • i IN \— 26 -7" -1, - 46.33" 0 cin 20'-0" -t 48.88�, lkilr4 r(;":16)-- �•. of iv SEE BASE \�\�41 d/1 TYP. ASSEMBLY PL. DWG. I N 52.05" 0 -' r- N M d- "III=I =III=III FOUNDATION PLAN VIEW N A P C ❑ a 0 C) —III- 1=III^ COALFIELD SITE - RENTON, VA. w w w w w VI CI) cn cn cn I I=I t . - ;I l I, l I 150' P01,1 DRAWN BY DATE JOB# A.F. 10-17-96 DRAWING NO. APPR. BY' NO DATE REVISION BY CWA1096N LILNLRAL NU I LSI - 1. 1. CONCRETE TO HAVE 4000 PSI STRENGTH AT 28 DAY CURE. & TO BE INSTALLED PER ACI_-318 CODE REQUIREMENTS. 2. REBAR TO BE GRADE 60 WITH ASTM-615 DEFORMATIONS. MONOPOLE REACTIONS 3. ALL REINFORCING STEEL TO HAVE MINIMUM OF 3" OVERTURN- 3517.6 FT-K CONCRETE COVER. SHEAR- 35.0K 4. CONCRETE 36.3 CU. YDS. MAX. DOWN- 32.9K 5. SHAFT DESIGNED PER EIA/TIA-222-E AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY AGRA EARTH & ENVIROMENTAL PROJECT NO. RENT-008-02.- 6. CONCRETE TO HAVE SLUMP OF 5" TO 7". 7. USE TREMIE IF REQUIRED, DO NOT DROP CONCRETE THRU WATER. 10" ANCHOR BOLT STICK-OUT. �. LEVEL (.._ ". _E DRAWING FOR ANCHOR BOLTS I \I 1 L.:: ,-'W:::. O WAS \II` II �'I yti�O 41+ )' TOP I VIEW - 1" CHAMFER -5L 6'-6u� o j , 7— GRADE /- 11%fis s I I I l �� 6" IONgL II II II 11 11 11 11 /b 11 11 11 _ 1 - - l EXPIRES 7/�,/! 9 !� I 11 1--I r ►-II I-III-r /� , U DETAIL 'B' u I I I=1 I I-I I I I I I DETAIL "B" BOTTOM TEMPLATE T -fffT[Lffi-----i ' (38)-#10 BARS 29'-0' EQUALLY SPACED III=III—III1I1 ' ff[{ ffl }f[-} (25)-H4 TIES 6'-O" O.D. -(4) SPACED AT 8" AT TOP III=IIIIIIIII 29'-0' (21)-EQUALLY SPACED —I 11E1 I I111=1 1=111=116 I I- NAPCO —III=I I'I=I DRILLED SHAFT-COALFIELD SITE I—I I I- r 150' MONOPOLE - RENTON, WA. -III- [` DRAWN flDATE • ,.ON• 10- 17-96 DRAWING ND. APPR. BY' NO DATE REVISI❑N BY CWANOFD ce W 16-18J x 10-0 A.B's , Gr. 75 _ ' 100% PEN. Mz My •.. SPACED ON 59 IN. BC. 1/27 si s � s r -�- � � , ti xis .. 1.2 MAXIMUM FOOTING LOADS LONG. WELD (TYP.) gi('4 11 \ HEIGHT FT Sy K Mz K-FT SZ K My K-FT VERT. K \ 0 150.00 35 3512.4 1.3 191.0 32.9 / 10 \ I _ _3 I Y-AXIS I I (SEE CALCS FOR MORE INFO) .- . ! S 4 PL 2.25 x 65 x 5-5— a2 (50 ksi) AV ba 7 6 5 ti� ��wits �4;:, ,- ,\. --'11- ______ fir It' QA . STENCIL MARK a.' b Prefix w/ 4"- N� sfoNAL�DWI Desig n •. H [ 6 ] . 3 ALL A.B. HOLES ARE 2 9/16 IN. DIA. CIMWAZWEilln aPRINT n""P�� Pali.q11• Imi IAN%II NM • L - WI:- 1C11Cb ANN.N ViOXC1 n b 3 Lr. c`'��'- ILL 111[I CO N UUI.M NUN KM IIn[[•i1 GALVANIC man 1Mlq IO1N l '"_`K •p1K11q Will LIla vim W.Mil IIMI W.J. Yllq I_UI um 1p f 1 y � oaG[•q CUSTOIfN .[V •(N11Q1 i(1[•Ylpl /uq more II NII qV NVIIpI KIOipIpI up(iv WI i1 NIS n•.• MI1W[i II - • NAPCO MONOPOLE SPECIFICATIONS NOMINAL POLE HEIGHT= 150' CUSTOMER: SPRINT SPECTRUM TOP OF STEEL ELEV. = 153'-4" MARKET: SEATTLE BASIC SHAFT LENGTH = 150' P.O. NUMBER: 23224-220-PO-070 SITE NAME/#= Coalfield NAPCO JOB#: 96-251-8 . • DESIGN PER EIA/TIA-222-E & SPRINT MONOPOLE SPECIFICATIONS © FOUNDATION DESIGN • © FOUNDATION DRAWINGS Q STRUCTURE DESIGN Ei P.E. STAMP WA -- DESIGN CONDITIONS: 100 MPH WIND SPEED HX 1" ICE X' I.4 Deg. TWIST LIMIT X, 1.4 Deg_ SWAY LIMIT CONCURRENT FINISH: ® GALVANIZED . III PAINT/GALVANIZED ANCHOR BOLTS /TEMPLATES: CAGED g LOOSE p • EQUIPMENT: TOP .© LIGHTNING ROD 5'-0" • 0 PLATFORM 12' Low Profile Ei_ROTATABLE III CANDELABRA ROTATABLE 15 ANTENNAS Scala AP17-1900 X COLLOCATE DISTANCE FROM TOP = 20' (Future) PLATFORM _ ROTATABLE 8 CANDELABRA ROTATABLE 9 ANTENNAS Scala API 7-1900 __ _ _ 0 MW 1 DISTANCE FROM TOP = 10' MW1 TYPE 8' 6 GHz • • 0, MW 2 DISTANCE FROM TOP = 10' MW2 TYPE 8' - 6 GHz E' ACCESS 1 DISTANCE FROM BOT 3' _ t BUSS BAR 1 5/8" • Q ACCESS 2 DISTANCE FROM BOT 8' El : BUSS BAR 2 �, ROar�' le SAFETY CLIMB KIT 'yw0 o was 4��T '.� F k � . • a ' HARNESS / BELT �� ' 3 0 -ze © STEP CLIPS y 4•% ' �. / El STEP BOLTS fw El 'GROUND PADS '* ,p SIONALer" � I GROUND LEADS/ RODS EXPIRES7/Z/ / q7 , **** KPOLE PROGRAM VER. 91 **** NONLINEAR STEEL POLE ANALYSIS 96-196 SPRINT, "150 FT" [6].3 • POLE HEIGHT : 150.00 FT. YOUNG'S MODULUS : 29000. KSI SHEAR MODULUS : 12000. KSI CROSS-SECTION SHAPE : 12 - SIDED -VERTICAL COORDINATES OF JOINTS FROM THE TOP- JOINT NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (FT) .00 10.00 20.00 30.00 50.00 70.00 90.00 110.00 130.00 -POLE SECTION DATA- SECTION 1 2 3 4 5 X-COOR. a THE BOTT. (FT) 39.750 ' 74.000 100.000 130.000 150.000 O.D. 0 THE TOP (IN) 23.200 30.147 36.574 41.157 46.332 O.D. a THE BOTT (IN) 31.746 38.478 43.311 48.879 52.047 SECTION LENGTH (FT) 39.750 34.250 26.000 • 30.000 20.000 SPLICE LENGTH (FT) .000 4.500 5.333 5.917 6.583 TOTAL SECTION LENGTH (FT) 39.750 38.750 31.333 35.917 26.583 PLATE THICKNESS (IN) .25000 .31250 .37500 .50000 .50000 MIN REQUIRED GRADE (KSI) GR50 GR50 GR50 GRSO GR50 GRADE USED (KSI) TAPER (IN/FT) .215000 .215000 .215000 .215000 .215000 TANGENT .008958 .008958 .008958 .008958 .008958 SECTION WEIGHT (LBS) 2964. 4511. 5094. 8760. 7091. TOTAL WEIGHT (LBS) 28420. -POLE SECTION PROPERTIES- X (FT) O.D.(IN) T (IN) AREA (IN2) W/T Fa(65) Fa(50) Fa(36) .00 23.20 .2500 18.47 22.72 65.00 50.00 36.00 5.00 24.28 .2500 19.34 23.87 65.00 50.00 36.00 10.00 25.35 .2500 20.21 25.03 65.00 50.00 36.00 15.00 26.43 .2500 21.07 26.18 65.00 50.00 36.00 20.00 27.50 .2500 21.94 27.33 65.00 50.00 36.00 25.00 28.58 .2500 22.80 28.48 65.00 50.00 36.00 30!.00 29.65 .2500 23.67 29.64 65.00 50.00 36.00 35.00 30.73 .2500 24.53 30.79 64.07 50.00 36.00 39.75 31.75 .2500 25.35 31.88 63.00 50.00 36.00 39.75 31.11 .3125 30.99 24.86 65.00 50.00 36.00 ;• 44.75 32.19 .3125 32.08 25.78 65.00 50.00 36.00 �'• R Oar 49.75 33.26 .3125 33.16 26.70 65.00 50.00 36.00 ,y��OF WA3k4 j�� 50.00 33.32 .3125 33.21 26.75 65.00 50.00 36.00f. �O - 55.00 34.39 .3125 34.29 27.67 65.00 50.00 36.00 y f it 60.00 35.47 .3125 35.38 28.59 65.00 50.00 36.00 ? :7 !� / f� 65.00 36.54 .3125 36.46 29.51 65.00 50.00 36.00 •~'/V y .4 33336 70.00 37.62 .3125 37.54 30.43 64.42 50.00 36.00 19 74.00 38.48 .3125 38.40 31.17 63.70 50.00 36.00SW3INAL 74.00 37.72 .3750 45.10 25.35 65.00 50.00 36.00 ` 79.00 38.80 .3750 46.39 26.11 65.00 50.00 36.00 84.00 39.87 .3750 47.69 26.88 65.00 50.00 36.00 [EXPIRES'��/' 89.00 40.95 .3750 48.99 27.65 65.00 50.00 36.00 90.00 41.16 .3750 49.25 27.80 65.00 50.00 36.00 95.00 42.24 .3750 50.55 28.57 65.00 50.00 36.00 , 96-196 SPRINT, "150 FT" [67.3 PAGE 2 100.00 43.31 .3750 51.85 29.34 65.00 50.00 36.00 100.00 42.43 .5000 67.51 21.40 65.00 50.00 36.00 • 105.00 43.50 .5000 69.24 21.97 65.00 50.00 ' 36.00 110.00 44.58 .5000 70.97 22.55 65.00 50.00 36.00 115.00 45.65 .5000 72.70 23.13 65.00 50.00 36.00 120.00 46.73 .5000 74.43 23.70 65.00 50.00 36.00 125:00 47.80 .5000 76.16 24.28 65.00 50.00 36.00 130.00 48.88 .5000 77.89 24.85 65.00 50.00 36.00 130.00 47.75 .5000 76.07 24.25 65.00 50.00 36.00 135.00 48.82 .5000 77.80 24.82 65.00 50.00 36.00 140.00 49.90 .5000 79.53 25.40 65.00 50.00 36.00 145.00 50.97 .5000 81.26 25.98 65.00 50.00 36.00 150.00 52.05 .5000 82.99 26.55 65.00 50.00 36.00 RESULTS FOR LOADING CASE 1 - CASE 1. 100 MPH WIND DISTRIBUTED LOADS - FACTOR FOR DEAD LOAD IN X-DIRECTION 1.000 WIND PRESSURE IN Y-DIRECTION .00 PSF WIND PRESSURE IN Z-DIRECTION .00 PSF ., LOADS ON' POLE - c0 0 wAS L1p� ' FORCES,KIPS MOMENTS,FT-KIPS it;JOINT X Y Z X Y Z co 's::-,t-Y O •, 1 2.189 5.054 .000 .000 .000 .000 £ -:, 2 .608 6.091 1.334 .000 .000 .000 f d 4,` 3 1.632 3.247 .000 .000 .000 .000 S9 4 .000 3.110 .000 .000 .000 .000 SIpNA1. I 5 .000 3.344 .000 ' .000 .000 .000 6 .000 3.505 .000 .000 .000 .000 EXPIRES 9/ //4 7 7 .000 3.566 .000 .000 .000 .000 8 .000 3.478 .000 .000 .000 .000 9 .000 3.577 .000 .000 .000 .000 ****** RESULTS FROM NONLINEAR ANALYSIS ****** FORCES,KIPS MOMENTS,FT-KIPS STRESS, DISPLACEMENTS,IN X,FT X-AXIAL Y-SHEAR Z-SHEAR X-TORQUE Y-BENDING Z-BENDING KSI X Y Z .00, 1.715 5.234 .012 .000 .000 .000 -.093 3.036 89.747 5.943 5.00' 2.037 5.263 .014 , .000 .067 -26.242 -2.777 2.781 84.236 5.560 10.00 2.375 5.292 .017 .000 .145 -52.630 -5.024 2.528 78.752 5.177 10.00' 2.417 11.413 1.353 .000 .145 -52.630 -5.026 2.528 78.752 5.177 15.00 2.780 11.442 1.355 .000 6.913 -109.767 -9.690 2.281 73.320 4.795 20.00, 3.165 11.469 1.357 .000 13.691 -167.045 -13.627 2.041 67.974 4.418 20.00 4.504 14.847 1.366 .000 13.691 -167.045 -13.688 2.041 67.974 4.418 25.00i 4.917 14.870 1.367 .000 20.523 -241.339 -18.252 1.812 62.749 4.051 30.00' 5.353 14.889 1.368 .000 27.362 -315.737 -22.131 1.596 57.676 3.697 30.00 5.094 17.988 1.367 .000 27.362 -315.737 -22.120 1.596 57.676 3.697 35.00 ' 5.562 18.004 1.368 .000 34.201 -405.720 -26.400 1.395 52.782 3.359 39.75 6.026 18.016 1.369 .000 40.702 -491.270 -29.888 1.220 48.323 3.053 39.75 , 6.492 18.052 1.371 .000 40.702 -491.270 -25.066 1.220 48.323 3.053 44.75 ; 7.087 18.069 1.372 .000 47.561 -581.573 -27.678 1.051 43.833 2.748 49.75 , 7.705 18.083 1.373 .000 54.422 -671.954 -29.905 .897 39.549 2.460 50.00 7.737 18.083 1.373 .000 54.766 -676.475 -30.007 .889 39.341 2.446 50.00 7.505 21.419 1.372 .000 54.766 -676.475 -30.000 .889 39.341 2.446 55.00 , 8.158 21.429 1.372 .000 61.627 -783.596 -32.557 .752 35.285 2.177 i 96-1% SPRINT, "150 FT" [6].3 PAGE 3 60.00 8.833 21.434 1.372 .000 68.488 -890.754 -34.750 .629 31.456 1.925 65.00 9.529 21.433 1.372 .000 75.348 -997.924 -36.630 .521 27.864 1.692 70.00 10.245 21.428 1.371 .000 82.206 -1.105.081 -38.239 .427 24.514 1.477 70.00 10.056 24.928 1.371 .000 82.206 -1105.081 -38.234 .427 24.514 1.477 74.00 10.655 24.921 1.370 .000 87.687 -1204.781 -39.800 .361 22.010 1.318 74.00 11.460 24.962 1.372 .000 87.687 -1204.781 -34.714 .361 22.010 1.318 79.00 12.331 24.955 1.372 .000 94.548 -1329.575 -36.171 .290 19.091 1.134 84.00 13.225 24.943 1.371 .000 101.403 -1454.323 -37.420 .229 16.398 .967 89.00 14.141 24.925 1.369 .000 108.252 -1578.995 -38.485 .178 13.931 .816 90.00 14.327 24.921 1.369 .000 109.621 -1603.917 -38.678 .169 13.465 .787 90.00 14.190 28.484 1.368 .000 109.621 -1603.917 -38.675 .169 13.465 .787 95.00 15.147 28.459 1.367 .000 116.459 -1746.278 -39.949 .129 11.271 .654 100.00 16.127 28.428 1.364 .000 123.287 -1888.498 -41.045 .096 9.306 .537 100.00 17.465 28.469 1.367 .000 123.287 -1888.498 -32.395 .096 9.306 .537 105.00 18.715 28.448 1.365 .000 130.117 -2030.793 -33.102 .070 7.548 .432 110.00 19.995 28.420 1.363 .000 136.938 -2172.964 -33.701 .050 5.974 .340 110.00 19.909 31.897 1.363 .000 136.938 -2172.964 -33.699 .050 5.974 .340 115.00 21.228 31.862 1.361 .000 143.749 -2332.364 -34.453 .033 4.583 i:3,4„ 120.00 22.577 31.821 1.358 .000 150.548 -2491.575 -35.099 .021 3.375 125.00 23.954 31.772 1.355 .000 157.333 -2650.561 -35.649 .012 2.348 130.00 25.360 31.717 1.352 .000 164.102 -2809.288 -36.113 .006 1.502 130.00 26.993 35.315 1.353 .000 164.102 -2809.288 -37.886 .006 1.502 135.00 28.415 35.241 1.349 .000 170.857 -2985.681 -38.478 .003 .842 140.00 29.865 35.159 1.344 .000 177.591 -3161.684 -38.978 .001 .373 145.00 31.343 35.069 1.339 .000 184.300 -3337.258 -39.396 .000 .093 150.00 32.849 34.972 1.334 .000 190.984 -3512.365 -39.742 .000 .000 RESULTS FOR LOADING CASE 2 - CASE 2. 87 MPH WIND W/ 1" ICE 1.• .y� ofw './'_Cec aDISTRIBUTED LOADS - FACTOR FOR DEAD LOAD IN X-DIRECTION 1.000 y 07.WIND PRESSURE IN Y-DIRECTION .00 PSF V/i /`, WIND PRESSURE IN Z-DIRECTION .00 PSF 1 3353t, ^ .. LOADS ON POLE - •�j"�`',j,SE i`V S1ONAL JOINT X FORCES,KIPS Z X MOMENTS,FT-KIPS Z l EXPIRES */.24 /97 ' 1 2.915 5.122 .000 .000 .000 .000 2 2.610 4.905 1.061 .000 .000 .000 3 2.148 3.268 .000 .000 .000 .000 4 .843 2.517 .000 .000 .000 .000 5 .947 2.685 .000 .000 .000 .000 6 1.052 2.797 .000 .000 .000 .000 7 1.156 2.833 .000 .000 .000 .000 8 1.261 2.751 .000 .000 .000 .000 9 1.365 2.820 .000 .000 .000 .000 ****** RESULTS FROM NONLINEAR ANALYSIS ****** FORCES,KIPS MOMENTS,FT-KIPS STRESS, DISPLACEMENTS,IN X,FT X-AXIAL Y-SHEAR Z-SHEAR X-TORQUE Y-BENDING Z-BENDING KSI X Y Z .00 2.473 5.349 .014 .000 .000 .000 -.134 2.507 81.340 4.798 5.00 2.795 5.376 .016 .000 .073 -26.813 -2.874 2.293 76.288 4.489 10.00 3.133 5.402 .017 .000 .155 -53.759 -5.167 2.082 71.264 4.179 10.00 5.320 10.507 1.091 .000 .155 -53.759 -5.275 2.082 71.264 4.179 15.00 5.682 10.530 1.092 .000 5.612 -106.354 -9.505 1.875 66.291 3.871 96-196 SPRINT, "150 FT" [67.3 PAGE 4 20.00 6.064 10.550 1.093 .000. 11.077 -159.057 -13.073 1.674 61.403 3.566 20.00 7.942 13.981 1.103 .000 11.077 -159.057 -13.158 1.674 61.403 3.566 25.00 8.352 13.993 1.104 .000 16.596 -228.995 -17.424 1.483 56.630 3.270 30.00 8.783 14.001 1.104 .000 22.117 -298.983 -21.045 1.304 52.000 2.984 30.00 9.433 16.575 1.108 .000 22.117 -298.983 -21.072 1.304 52.000 2.984 35.00 9.892 16.576 1.107 .000 27.655 -381.863 -24.960 1.137 47.541 2.710 39.75 10.348 16.572 1.107 .000 32.914 -460.591 -28.124 .992 43.483 2.464 39.75, 10.814 16.604 1.109 .000 32.914 -460.591 -23.584 .992 43.483 2.464 44.75 11.402 16.606 1.109 .000 38.458 -543.620 -25.947 .853 39.403 2.217 49.75 12.011 16.603 1.108 .000 44.000 -626.645 -27.956 .726 35.516 1.985 50.00 12.042 16.603 1.108 .000 44.277 -630.796 -28.048 .720 35.327 1.974 50.00 12.818 19.342 1.111 .000 44.277 -630.796 -28.072 .720 35.327 1.974 55.00 13.458 19.332 1.110 .000 49.830 -727.485 -30.317 .607 31.653 1.756 60.00 14.119 19.317 1.109 .000 55.377 -824.109 -32.237 .507 28.190 1.553 65.00 14.801 19.296 1.107 .000 60.917 -920.644 -33.876 .419 24.945 1.365 70:00: 15.502 19.271 1.105 .000 66.448 -1017.066 -35.272 .342 21.923 1.191 70.00 16.418 22.116 1.108 .000 66.448 -1017.066. -35.296 .342 21.923 1.191 74.00 17.001 22.090 1.106 .000 70.876 -1105.478 -36.625 .289 19.669 1.063 74.00 17.806 22.126 1.108 .000 70.876 -1105.478 -31.943 .289 19.669 1.063 79.00 18.660 22.098 1.106 .000 76.411 -1216.041 -33.170 .231 17.044 .915 84.00 19.536 22.064 1.104 .000 81.936 -1326.448 -34.215 .182 14.626 .780 89.001 20.434 22.026 1.101 .000 87.449 -1436.675 -35.100 .142 12.414 .657 90.00' 20.616 22.017 1.101 .000 88.549 -1458.697 -35.260 .134 11.996 . .634 90.00 21.674 24.888 1.103 .000 88.549 -1458.697 -35.282 .134 11.996 .634 95.00, 22.608 24.840 1.100 ' .000 94.056 -1583.020 -36.321 .102 10.033 .527 100.001 23.565 24.785 1.096 .000 99.546 -1707.085 -37.208 .076 8.277 .432 100.00' 24.903 24.822 1.098 .000 99.546 -1707.085 -29.365 .076 8.277 .432 105.00' 26.135 24.782 1.096 .000 105.031 -1831.098 -29.928 .056 6.708 .348 110.00 27.396 24.736 1.093 .000 110.504 -1954.894 -30.400 .039 5.305 .274 110.001 28.596 27.514 1.095 .000 110.504 -1954.894 -30.417 .039 5.305 .274 115.00 29.893 27.459 1.091 .000 115.969 -2092.330 -31.007 .026 4.066 .209 120.00 31.220 27.398 1.088 .000 121.418 -2229.476 -31.506 .017 2.992 .153 125.00; 32.575 27.332 1.084 .000 126.849 -2366.303 -31.925 .010 2.081 .106 130.00 33.958 27.259 1.080 .000 132.261 -2502.782 -32.272 .005 1.330 .067 130.00 36.970 30.113 1.082 .000 132.261 -2502.782 -33.874 .005 1.330 .067 135.00 38.364 30.019 1.077 .000 ' 137.660 -2653.114 -34.312 .002 .745 .037 140.00 39.787 29.918 1.072 .000 143.033 -2802.959 -34.676 .001 .330 .017 145.00 41.238 29.811 1.067 .000 148.380 -2952.284 -34.973 .000 .082 .004 150.00 42.717 29.698 1.061 .000 153.699 -3101.060 -35.209 .000 .000 .000 RESULTS FOR LOADING CASE 3 - CASE 3. 50 MPH WIND . ' 0•`,. ROB y� �pv WAS$.1.T . FT ,. o DISTRIBUTED LOADS - FACTOR FOR DEAD LOAD IN X-DIRECTION 1.000 y • s�:=. .y WIND PRESSURE IN Y-DIRECTION .00 PSF WIND PRESSURE IN Z-DIRECTION .00 PSF // LOADS ON POLE - ,1' I SiONAL FORCES,KIPS . MOMENTS,FT-KIPS JOINT X Y Z X Y Z EXPIRES yam /r 9 7 I 1 2.189 1.263 .000 .000 .000 .000 2 .608 1.523 .334 .000 .000 .000 3 1.632 .812 .000 .000 .000 .000 4 .000 .778 .000 .000 .000 .000 5 .000 .836 .000 .000 .000 .000 6 .000 .876 .000 .000 .000 .000 i • 96-196 SPRINT, "150 FT" C63.3 ' " PAGE 5 7 .000 .892 .000 .000 .000 .000 8 .000 - .869 .000 .000 .000 .000 9 .000 .894 .000 .000 .000 .000 ****** RESULTS FROM NONLINEAR ANALYSIS ****** ; FORCES,KIPS MOMENTS,FT-KIPS STRESS, DISPLACEMENTS,IN X,FT; X-AXIAL Y-SHEAR Z-SHEAR X-TORQUE Y-BENDING Z-BENDING KSI X Y Z .00 2.159 1.313 .003 .000 .000 .000 -.117 .191 22.501 1.492 5.00 2.481 1.320 .004 .000 .019 -6.584 -.799 .175 21.118 1.396 10.00 2.817 1.328 .005 .000 .040 -13.204 -1.371 .159 19.742 1.300 10.00 3.390 2.864 .339 .000 .040 -13.204 -1.399 .159 19.742 1.300 15.00 3.742 2.871 .340 .000 1.739 -27.543 -2.576 .143 18.379 1.204 20.00 4.109 2.878 .340 .000 3.440 -41.915 -3.570 .128 17.038 1.109 20.00 5.723 3.726 .343 .000 3.440 -41.915 -3.644 .128 17.038 1.109 25.00 6.105 3.730 .343 .000 5.156 -60.555 -4.793 .114 15.727 1.017 30.00 6.503 3.734 .343 .000 6.873 -79.218 -5.771 .100 14.454 .928 30.00 6.487 4.512 .343 .000 6.873 -79.218 -5.770 .100 14.454 .928 35.00 6.900 4.515 .344 .000 8.590 -101.787 -6.848 .087 13.227 .843 39.75 7.307 4.517 ' .344 " .000 10.223 -123.239 -7.727 .076 12.108 .766 39.75 7.774 4.526 .344 .000 10.223 -123,239 -6.486 .076 12.108 .766 44.75 8.315 4.529 .344 .000 11.944 -145.878 -7.147 .066 10.982 .690 49.75 8.874 4.532 .344 .000 13.666 -168.530 -7.710 .056 9.908 .617 50.00 8.902 4.532 .344 .000 13.752 -169.663 -7.736 .056 9.856 .614 50.00 8.888 5.368 .344 .000 13.752 -169.663 -7.735 .056 9.856 .614 55.00 9.467 5.369 .344 .000 15.474 -196.504 -8.381 .047 8.839 .546 60.00 10.065 5.369 .344 .000 17.196 -223.348 -8.935 .039 7.879 .483 65.00 10.681 5.367 .344 .000 18.917 -250.189 -9.411 .033 6.979 .425 70.00 11.316 5.365 .344 .000 20.636 -277.021 -9.819 .027 6.139 .371 70.00 11.304 6.241 .344 .000 20.636 -277.021 -9.819. .027 6.139 .371 74.00 11.826 6.238 .344 .000 22.011 -301.980 -10.215 .023 5.512 .331 74.00 12.632 6.248 .344 .000 22.011 -301.980 -8.918 .023 5.512 .331 79.00, 13.416 6.246 .344 .000 23.731 -333.215 -9.288 .018 4.781 .285 84.00 14.222 6.242 .344 .000 25.449 -364.434 -9.606 .014 4.106 .243 89.00, 15.051 6.236 .343 .000 27.166 -395.629 -9.878 .011 3.488 .205 90.00 15.219 6.235 .343 .000 27.509 -401.864 -9.927 .011 3.371 .197 90.00: 15.210 7.127 .343 .000 27.509 -401.864 -9.927 .011 3.371 .197 95.00, 16.066 7.120 .342 .000 29.222 -437.481 -10.251 .008 2.822 .164 100.00, 16.944 7.111 .342 .000 30.933 -473.059 -10.531 .006 2.330 .135 100.00 18.282 7.121 .342 .000 30.933 -473.059 -8.321 .006 2.330 .135 105.00 19.451 7.115 .342 .000 32.644 -508.652 -8.505 .004 1.890 .108 110.00 20.649 7.108 .341 .000 34.353 -544.211 -8.661 .003 1.495 .085 110.00 20.644 7.977 .341 .000 34.353 -544.211 -8.661 .003 1.495 .085 115.00 21.872 7.968 .341 .000 36.059 -584.073 -8.856 .002 1 4 " '' ':,. 120.001 23.130 7.957 .340 .000 37.761 -623.885 -9.024 .001 Si 845,... R 125.00I 24.417 7.944 .339 .000 39.460 -663.639 -9.168 .001 4<,:if WASH 1), 130.00 ; 25.733 7.930 .339 .000 41.155 -703.326 -9.290 . .000 '' 6 I L'„ 130.001 27.409 8.829 .339 .000 41.155 -703.326 -9.757 .•.c 17376 - '.1.4•. 1 y - 135.00 ! 28.725 8.811 .338 .000 42.847 -747.427 -9.910 ..'. .211 140.00 30.070 8.790 .337 .000 44.533 -791.430 -10.041 .'is • .09= ii •� . �, A 145.00 ' 31.445 8.767 .335 .000 46.213 -835.324 -10.152 .000 , 1 0 . 33i36.6t • 150.00 , 32.849 8.743 .334 .000 47.886 -879.101 -10.244 .000 • : :.' • '?:. SIONAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF POLE ****** I EXPIRES 7/?�/g 6 FORCES,KIPS MOMENTS,FT-KIPS STRESS, DISPLACEMENTS,IN X,FT X-AXIAL Y-SHEAR Z-SHEAR X-TORQUE Y-BENDING Z-BENDING KSI X Y Z 96-196 SPRINT, "150 FT" [61.3 • PAGE 6 RESULTS FOR LOADING CASE 1 - CASE 1. 100 MPH WIND .00 1.715 5.234 .012 .000 .000 .000 -.093 3.036 89.747 5.943 150.00 32.849 34.972 1.334 .000 190.984 -3512.365 -39.742 .000 .000 .000 RESULTS FOR LOADING CASE 2 - CASE 2. 87 MPH WIND W/ 1" ICE .00 2.473 5.349 .014 .000 .000 .000 -.134 2.507 81.340 4.798 150.00 42.717 29.698 1.061 .000 153.699 -3101.060 -35.209 .000 .000 .000 RESULTS FOR LOADING CASE 3 - CASE 3. 50 MPH WIND .00 2.159 1.313 .003 .000 .000 .000 -.117 .191 22.501 1.492 150.00 32.849 8.743 .334 .000 47.886 -879.101 -10.244 .000 .000 .000 STRESS ENVELOPE FOR ANALYSIS OF 150.00 FT. TALL STRUCTURE - X AT SECTION,FT STRESS,KSI LOAD CASE NUMBER RATIO(65) RATIO(50) RATIO(36) SECT .00 -.13 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 5.00 -2.87 2 0.04 0.06 0.08 1 10.00 -5.17 2 0.08 0.10 0.14 1 10.00 -5.28 2 0.08 0.11 0.15 1 • 15.00 -9.69 1 0.15 0.19 0.27 1 20.00 -13.63 1 0.21 0.27 0.38 1 20.00 -13.69 1 0.21 0.27 0.38 1 25.00 -18.25 1 0.28 0.37 0.51 1 30.00 -22.13 1 0.34 0.44 0.61 1 30.00 -22.12 1 0.34 0.44 0.61 1 35.00 -26.40 1 0.41 0.53 0.73 1 39.75 -29.89 1 0.47 0.60 0.83 1 39.75 -25.07 1 0.39 0.50 0.70 2 44.75 -27.68 1 0.43 0.55 0.77 2 49.75 -29.91 1 0.46 0.60 0.83 2 50.00 -30.01 1 0.46 0.60 0.83 2 50.00 -30.00 1 0.46 0.60 0.83 2 55.00 -32.56 1 0.50 0.65 0.90 2 60.00 -34.75 1 0.53 0.69 0.97 2 65.00 -36.63 1 0.56 0.73 1.02 2 70.00 -38.24 1 0.59 0.76 1.06 2 70.00 -38.23 1 0.59 0.76 1.06 2 74.00 -39.80 1 0.62 0.80 . 1.11 2 74.00 -34.71 1 0.53 0.69 0.96 3 79.00 -36.17 1 0.56 0.72 1.00 3 84.00 -37.42 1 0.58 0.75 1.04 3 89.00 -38.49 1 0.59 0.77 1.07 3 90.00 -38.68 1 0.60 0.77 1.07 3 -v,. s... ,,l: 90.00 -38.68 1 0.60 0.77 1.07 R 1 _ 95.00 -39.95 1 0.61 0.80 1.11 3'�,O WAs� c��. 100.00 -41.04 1 0.63 0.82 1.14 3 hr - -' Ox / 100.00 -32.40 1 0.50 0.65 0.90 4 '° I" ` 105.00 -33.10 1 0.51 0.66 0.92 3;" '' ® . 110.00 -33.70 1 0.52 0.67 0.94 ph RV 110.00 -33.70 1 0.52 0.67 0.94 4' SADNAL 115.00 -34.45 1 0.53 0.69 0.96 4 .. 120.00 -35.10 1 0.54 0.70 0.97 (EXt4RES y//40°7 125.00 -35.65 1 0.55 0.71 0.99 4 130.00 -36.11 1 0.56 0.72 1.00 4 96-196 SPRINT, °150 FT" [67.3 PAGE 7 130.00 -37.89 1 0.58 0.76 1.05 5 135.00 • -38.48 1 0.59 0.77 1.07 5 140.00 -38.98 1 0.60 0.78 1.08 5 145.00 -39.40 1 0.61 0.79 1.09 5 150.00 -39.74 1 0.61 0.79 1.10 5 o• A.'' R°Z1r yGeVwAs;14 to „� Q • • y J /.• , vd4DNAL 1 EXPIRES ��/g 2 0 DESIGN : 8(6].3 TT. DIA.: 52.05 191.0 MZ = 3512.4 V = 32.9 12 SIDED POLYGON DIST. BETWEEN BOLTS = 11.58 = 29.50 = 6962.0 ZI = 6962.0 LT # Rx Rz P e b1 b2 b STRESS 1 28.93 5.76 179.12 2.91 10.46 9.32 9.32 44.19 2 24.53 16.39 155.95 3.41 10.46 10.33 10.33 40.73 3 16.39 24.53 109.35 3.41 10.46 10.33 10.33 28.56 4 5.76 28.93 46.42 2.91 10.46 9.32 9.32 11.45 Pmax= 179.12 STRESS max = 44.19 16 -18J * 10-0 A.B'S. * 50 GRADE 75 PL 2.25 * 65 * 5 - 5 SPACED ON 59 IN. BC • ROI3l y-,O oV wtisk �j� e .` t °x �z • 1" / C S1ONAL EXPIRES Vaj, /t' ' ' *************, µ- ************************ ************ * PROGRAM 1_._ LE 4 . 0 for DOS * * (C) COPYRIGHT ENSOFT, INC. , 1995 * * ALL RIGHTS RESERVED * * * * * * Prepared for: * * * * LEO ROBERTS , P.E. * * RT. 3 , BOX 663 * * OWASSO. OK 74055 * * License No . 804-061296 * * * * Program to be used only by Licensee * * Duplication permitted only for backup copy * * * ******************************************************* PROGRAM LPILE Version 4 . 0 (C) COPYRIGHT 1986 , 1987, 1989 , 1993 ENSOFT, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED COALFIELD WA 15OFT MPOLE 78IN X 29FT 2 STRATA MED DENSE & DENSE SAND UNITS--ENGLISH UNITS INPUT I N FORMAT I O N ********************************* L. RQ�� ,.: THE LOADING IS CYCLIC V0 orw& �ci vim. NO: OF CYCLES = . 10D+02 v • h� O 1 is sssx. 'y� PILE GEOMETRY AND PROPERTIES 9 'stti° 7kPSIoNAL PILE LENGTH = 348 . 00 I N EXPIRES y/, /97 2 POINTS X DIAMETER MOMENT OF AREA MODULUS OF INERTIA ELASTICITY IN IN IN**4 IN**2 LBS/IN**2 . 00 78 . 000 . 182D+07 . 478D+04 . 311D+07 324 . 00 78 . 000 _ . 182D+07 . 478D+04• . 311D+07 'SOILS INFORMATION . I i X AT THE GROUND SURFACE _ . 00 IN SLOPE AT THE GROUND SURFACE . _ . 00 DEG. 2 LAYER(S) OF SOIL LAYER 1 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY REESE ET AL, 1974 X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = . 00 IN X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = 264 . 00 IN MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = . 750D+02 LBS/IN**3 LAYER 2 THE SOIL IS A SAND - P-Y CRITERIA BY REESE ET AL, 1974 X AT THE TOP OF THE LAYER = 264 . 00 IN X AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LAYER = 348 . 00 IN MODULUS OF SUBGRADE REACTION = . 175D+03 LBS/IN**3 i DISTRIBUTION OF EFFECTIVE UNIT WEIGHT WITH DEPTH ! • 2 POINTS X. IN WEIGHT,LBS/IN**3 . 00 . 58D-01 348 . 00 . 58D-01 DISTRIBUTION OF STRENGTH PARAMETERS WITH DEPTH 4 POINTS X , IN C,LBS/IN**2 PHI ,DEGREES E50 . 00 . 000D+00 . 360D+02 264 . 00 . 000D+00 . 360D+02 264 . 00 . 000D+00 . 400D+02 348 . 00 . 000D+00 - . 400.D+02 =` .k R pal. 'w0 GF JAsy �'1 BOUNDARY AND LOADING CONDITIONS y •: x • /p 9 . LOADING NUMBER 1 SfONAL BOUNDARY-CONDITION CODE = 1 LATERAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD = . 350D+05 �� MOMENT AT THE PILE HEAD = . 422D+08 jN-LBS ' AXIAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD = . 329D+05 LBS FINITE-DIFFERENCE PARAMETERS NUMBER OF PILE INCREMENTS = 100 DEFLECTION TOLERANCE ON DETERMINATION OF CLOSURE = . 100D-04 IN MAXIMUM NUMBER OF ITERATIONS ALLOWED FOR PILE ANALYSIS = 100 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEFLECTION = . 10D+03 IN • OUTPUT CODES KOUTPT = 1 KPYOP = 1 INC = 1 DEPTH DIAM PHI GAMMA AVG A B PCT PCD IN IN LBS/IN**3 348 . 00 78 . 00 40 . 0 . 580D-01 . 91 . 57 . 302D+05 . 142D+06 Y p IN LBS/IN YK = . 983D-01 . 000D+00 . 000D+00 . 108D+00 . 541D+04 . 217D+00 . 748D+04 . 325D+00 . 904D+04 . 433D+00 . 103D+05 . 542D+00 . 115D+05 . 650D+00 . 125D+05 . 758D+00 . 134D+05 . 867D+00 . 143D+05 . 975D+00 . 151D+05 . 108D+01 . 159D+05 . 119D+01 . 166D+05 . 130D+01 . 173D+05 . 293D+01 , 273D+05 . 809D+02 . 273D+05 . 159D+03 . 273D+05 . . . 237D+03 . 2 73D+05 t R04? OUTPUT INFORMATION '`� ********************************* _1 '`'` � � '�is�xd -SIONAL LOADING NUMBER 1 EXPIRES ' 2 4 7 BOUNDARY CONDITION CODE = 1 LATERAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD = . 350D+05 LBS MOMENT AT THE PILE HEAD = . 422D+08 IN-LBS AXIAL LOAD AT THE PILE HEAD = . 329D+05 LBS X DEFLECTION MOMENT SHEAR SOIL TOTAL FLEXURAL REACTION STRESS RIGIDITY IN IN LBS-IN LBS LBS/IN LBS/IN**2 LBS-IN**2 Iyy yy yy yy yy yy yy yy,y..Ly y yy yy yy yy y y J..1 y y y y y y y y J,y y y y y y y y y J..1.y y y.y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y.y ' ***** ******TTTT ***4 **** ********** ***'*****, '*****•***** ********** . 00 . 518D+00. . 4 -_�+08 . 350D+05 . 000D+Ucf .913D+03 . 565D+13 3 . 48 . 508D+00 . 423D+08 . 350D+05 - . 238D+02 . 916D+03 . 565D+13 6 . 96 . 498D+00 . 425D+08 . 348D+05 - . 512D+02 . 918D+03 . 565D+13 10 . 44 . 488D+00 . 426D+08 . 346D+05 - . 824D+02 . 921D+03 . 565D+13 13 . 92 . 478D+00 . 427D+08 . 343D+05 - . 118D+03 . 923D+03 . 565D+13 17 . 40 . 468D+00 . 428D+08 . 338D+05 - . 157D+03 . 926D+03 . 565D+13 20 . 88 . 458D+00 . 429D+08 . 332D+05 - . 200D+03 . 928D+03 . 565D+13 24 . 36 . 448D+00 . 430D+08 . 324D+05 - . 249D+03 . 931D+03 . 565D+13 27. 84 . 439D+00 . 432D+08 . 314D+05 - . 302D+03 . 933D+03 . 565D+13 31 . 32 . 429D+00 . 433D+08 . 303D+05 - . 359D+03 . 936D+03 . 565D+13 34 . 80 . 420D+00 .•434D+08 . 289D+05 - . 422D+03 . 938D+03 . 565D+13 38 . 28 . 411D+00 . 435D+08 . 273D+05 - . 491D+03 . 940D+03 . 565D+13 41 . 76 . 401D+00 . 436D+08 . 255D+05 - . 557D+03 . 942D+03 . 565D+13 45 . 24 . 392D+00 . 436D+08 . 234D+05 - . 625D+03 . 944D+03 . 565D+13 48 . 72 . 383D+00 . 437D+08 . 212D+05 - . 696D+03 . 945D+03 . 565D+13 52 . 20 . 374D+.00 . 438D+08 . 186D+05 - . 771D+03 . 947D+03 . 565D+13 55 . 68 . . 365D+00 . 439D+08 . 158D+05 - . 850D+03 . 948D+03 . 565D+13 59 . 16 . 356D+00 . 439D+08 . 127D+05 - . 932D+03 . 949D+03 . 565D+13 62 . 64 . 348D+00 . 439D+08 . 928D+04 - . 102D+04 . 950D+03 . 565D+13 66 . 12 . 339D+00 . 440D+08 . 559D+04 - . 111D+04 . 951D+03 . 565D+13 69 . 60 . 331D+00 ..440D+08 . 158D+04 - . 120D+04 . 951D+03 . 565D+13 73. 08 . 322D+.00 . 440D+08 - . 276D+04 - . 130D+04 . 951D+03 . 565D+13 76 . 56 . 314D+00 . 440D+08 - . 745D+04 - . 140D+04 . 951D+03 . 565D+13 80 . 04 . 306D+00 . 439D+08 - . 125D+05 - . 149D+04 . 950D+03 . 565D+13 83 . 52 . 298D+00 . 439D+08 - . 178D+05 - . 158D+04 . 949D+03 . 565D+13 87. 00 . 290D+00 . 438D+08 - . 235D+05 - . 168D+04. . 947D+03 . 565D+13 90 . 48 . 282D+00 . 437D+08 - . 295D+05 - . 177D+04 . 945D+03 . 565D+13 43 . 96 . 274D+00 . 436D+08 - . 358D+05 - . 187D+04 . 943D+03 . 565D+13 97. 44 . 266D+00 . 435D+08 - . 425D+05 - . 194D+04 . 940D+03 . 565D+13 100 . 92 . 258D+00 . 433D+08 - . 493D+05 - . 196D+04 . 936D+03 . 565D+13 104 . 40 . 251D+00 , 431D+08• - . 561D+05 - . 196D+04 . 933D+03 . 565D+13 10(7 . 88 . 243D+00 . 429D+08 - . 629D+05 - . 197D+04 . 928D+03 . 565D+13 111 . 36 . 236D+00 . 427D+08 - . 698D+05 - . 197D+04 . 923D+03 . 565D+13 11'4 . 84 . 229D+00 . 424D+08 - . 766D+05, - . 197D+04 . 918D+03 . 565D+13 118 . 32 . 222D+00 . 422D+08 - . 835D+05 - . 197D+04 . 912D+03 . 565D+13 121 . 80 . 214D+00 . 419D+08 - . 903D+05 - . 196D+04 . 905D+03 . 565D+13 125 . 28 . 207D+00 . 415D+08 - . 971D+05 - . 195D+04 . 898D+03 . 565D+13 128 . 76 . 201D+00 . 412D+08 - . 104D+06 - . 194D+04 . 891D+03 . 565D+13 132 . 24 . 194D+00 . 408D+08 - . 111D+06 - . 192D+04 . 883D+03 . 565D+13 135 . 72 . 187D+00 . 404D+08 - . 117D+06 - . 190D+04 . 874D+03 . 565D+13 139 . 20 . 180D+00 . 400D+08 - . 124D+06 - . 188D+04 . 865D+03 . 565D+13 142 . 68 . 174D+00 . 395D+08 - . 130D+06 - . 186D+04 . 856D+03 . 565D+13 146. 16 . 167D+00 . 391D+08 - . 137D+06 - . 183D+04 . 846D+03 . 565D+13 149 . 64 . 161D+00 . 386D+08 - . 143D+06 - . 180D+04 . 835D+03 . 565D+13 153 . 12 . 155D+00 . 381D+08 - . 149D+06 - . 177D+04 . 824D+03 . 565D+13 156 . 60 . 148D+00 . 376D+08 ' - . 155D+06 - . 174D•+04 . 813D+03 . 565D+13 160 . 08 . 142D+00 . 370D+08 . 161D+06 - . 171D+04 . 801D+03 . 565D+13 163 . 56 . 136D+00 . 364D+08 - . 167D+06 - . 167D+04 . 7891 ,1 , 765D+13 167. 04 . 130D+00 . 358D+08 - . 173D+06 - . 163D+04 . 7 - i+t03 ROB : :,F.D+13 170 . 52 . 124D+00 . 352D+08 - . 179D+06 - . 159D+04 .3 •3JAsi► - +13 174 . 00 . 118D+00 . 346D+08 - . 184D+06 - . 154D+04 , 4n• �, fig, 1. 13 177. 48 . 112D+00 . 339D+08 - . 189D+06 - . 150D+04 7 4y+ 1r , S% ,D 180 . 96 . 107D+00 . 333D+08 - . 195D+06 - . 145D+04. _ 7 . 1D+ 1 r-.4 64 ► i / 184 . 44 . 101D+00 . 326D+08 - . 199D+06 - . 140D+04 71..D+ 1 . . �►, .. '- G tsrEa sSS1ONAL [EXPIRES7A/ .Jg7 '187 . 92 . 955D-01 . D+08 - . 204D+06 - . 135D+', : . 691D+03 . 565D+13 191 . 40 . 900D-01 =1)+08 - . 209D+06 - . 129D+04 . 676D+03 . 565D+13 194 . 88 . 846D-01 . 304D+08 - . 213D+06 - . 124D+04 . 660D+03 . 565D+13 198 . 36 . 793D-01 . 297D+08 - . 217D+06 - . 118D+04 . 644D+03 . 565D+13 201 . 84 . 740D-01 . 289D+08 - . 221D+06 - . 112D+04 . 628D+03 . 565D+13 205 . 32 . 687D-01 . 281D+08 - . 225D+06 - . 106D+04 . 611D+03 . 565D+13 208 . 80 . 635D-01 . 274D+08 - . 229D+06 - . 995D+03 . 594D+03 . 565D+13 212 . 28 . 584D-01 . 266D+08 - . 232D+06 - . 930D+03 . 577D+03 . 565D+13 215 . 76 . 534D-01. . 257D+08 - . 235D+06 - . 863D+03 . 559D+03 . 565D+13 219 . 24 . 483D-01 . 249D+08 - . 238D+06 - . 795D+03 . 542D+03 . 565D+13 222 . 72 . 434D-01 . 241D+08 - . 241D+06 - . 725D+03 . 524D+03 . 565D+13 226. 20 . 385D-01 . 232D+08 - , 243D+06 - . 653D+03 . 506D+03 . 565D+13 229 . 68 . 336D-01 . 224D+08 - . 245D+06 - . 579D+03 . 487D+03 . 5650+13 233 . 16 . 288D-01 . 215D+08 - . 247D+06 - . 504D+03 . 469D+03 . 565D+13 236 . 64 . 241D-01 . 207D+08 - . 249D+06 - . 427D+03 . 451D+03 . 565D+13 240 . 12 . 194D-01 . 198D+08 - . 250D+06 - . 349D+03 . 432D+03 . 565D+13 243 . 60 . 147D-01 . 189D+08 - . 251D+06 - . 268D+03 . 413D+03 . 565D+13 247. 08 . 101D-01 . 181D+08 - . 252D+06 - . 186D+03 . 394D+03 . 565D+13 250 . 56 . 547D-02 . 172D+08 - . 253D+06 - . 103D+03 . 376D+03 . 565D+13 254 . 04 . 912D-03 . 163D+08 - . 253D+06 - . 174D+02 . 357D+03 '. 565D+13 257 . 52 - . 361D-02 . 154D+08 - . 253D+06 . 697D+02 . 338D+03 . 565D+13 261 . 00 - . 810D-02 . 145D+08 - . 252D+06 . 158D+03 . 319D+03 . 560+13 264 . 48 - . 126D-01 . 137D+08 - . 251D+06 . 477D+03 . 300D+03 • . 565D+13 267. 96 - . 170D-01 . 128D+08 - . 249D+06 . 655D+03 . 281D+03 . 565D+13 271 . 44 - . 214D-01 . 119D+08 - , 247D+06 . 838D+03 . 263D+03 . 565D+13 274 . 92 - . 258D-01 . 111D+08 - . 243D+06 . 103D+04 . 245D+03 . 565D+13 278 . 40 - . 301D-01 . 102D+08 - . 239D+06 . 122D+04 . 227D+03 . 565D+13 281 . 88 - . 344D-01 . 941D+07 - . 235D+06 . 141D+04 . 209D+03 . 565D+13 285 . 36 - . 387D-01 . 860D+07 - . 230D+06 . 161D+04 . 191D+03 . 565D+13 288 . 84 - . 430D-01 . 781D+07 - . 224D+06 . 182D+04 . 174D+03 . 565D+13 292 . 32 - . 473D-01 . 704D+07 - . 217D+06 . 203D+04 . 158D+03 . 565D+13 295 . 80 - . 516D-01 . 630D+07 - . 210D+06 . 224D+04 . 142D+03 . 565D+13 299 . 28 - . 558D-01 . 558D+07 - . 201D+06 . 246D+04 . 127D+03 . 565D+13 302 . 76 - . 600D-01 . 490D+07 - . 192D+06 . 268D+04 . 112D+03 . 565D+13 306 . 24 - . 643D-01 . 424D+07 - . 183D+06 . 291D+04 . 980D+02 . 565D+13 309 . 72 - . 685D-01 . 363D+07 - . 172D+06 . 314D+04 . 847D+02 . 565D+13 313 . 20 - . 727D-01 . 305D+07 - . 161D+06 . 338D+04 . 723D+02 , 565D+13 316 . 68 - . 769D-01 . 251D+07 - . 149D+06 . 362D+04 . 607D+02 . 565D+13 32i0 . 16 - . 811D-01 . 201D+07 - . 136D+06 . 387D+04 . 501D+02 . 565D+13 323 . 64 - . 853D-01 . 156D+07 - . 122D+06 . 412D+04 . 405D+02 . 565D+13 327 . 12 - . 894D-01 . 117D+07 - . 107D+06 . 438D+04 . 319D+02 . 565D+13 330 . 60 - . 936D-01 . 820D+06 - . 912D+05 . 464D+04 . 245D+02 . 565D+13 334 . 08 - . 978D-01 . 531D+06 - . 746D+05 . 491D+04 . 183D+02 . 565D+13 337. 56 - . 102D+00 . 301D+06 - . 570D+05 . 518D+04 . 134D+02 . 565D+13 341 . 04 - . 106D+00 . 134D+06 - . 385D+05 . 546D+04 . 977D+01 . 565D+13 344 . 52 - . 110D+00 . 335D+05 - . 194D+05 . 557D+04 . 760D+01 . 565D+13 348 . 00 - . 115D+00 . 000D+00 . 000D+00 . 555D+04 . 689D+01 . 565D+13 01� RO$rr. .. OUTPUT VERIFICATION ‘V w�s1yLtigA tjr1., % THE MAXIMUM MOMENT IMBALANCE FOR ANY ELEMENT - • 124D- t�=c 1 THE MAX. LATERAL FORCE IMBALANCE FOR ANY ELEMENT . 1 '°.; s ,rr ; 1 .1 10A, Cismit3 EXPIRES 7/2.i /*7 OUTPUT SUMMARY PILE-HEAD DEFLECTION = . 518D+00 IN COMPUTED SLOPE AT PILE HEAD . 296D-02 MAXIMUM BENDING MOMENT = . 440D+08 LBS-IN MAXIMUM SHEAR FORCE = - . 253D+06 LBS NO. OF ITERATIONS = 12 NO. OF ZERO DEFLECTION POINTS = 1 SUMMARY TABLE ************************* BOUNDARY BOUNDARY AXIAL PILE HEAD MAX. MAX . CONDITION CONDITION LOAD DEFLECTION MOMENT SHEAR BC1 BC2 LBS IN IN-LBS LBS . 3502D+05 . 4221D+08 . 3290D+05 . 5184D+00 . 4398D+08 - . 2528D+06 �. ROBr v 41°OV WM/1 .<1: v - ca (EXPIRES 7/&/ /4,9 I **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/08/97 14 : 12 Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9705069 Amount: 1, 200 . 00 08/08/97 14 : 11 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #3524 SPRINT Init: LMN Project #: LUA97-106 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 082305-9167 Site Address : 919 HOUSER WY N Total Fees : 1, 201.92 This Payment 1, 200 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 201. 92 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0006 Conditional Use Fees 1, 000 . 00 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 200 . 00 **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Reprinted: 08/08/97 14 : 13 Receipt *****'*********************************************************** Receipt Number: R9705071 Amount: 1.92 08/08/97 14 : 12 Payment Method: CASH Notation: Init : LMN Project # : LUA97-106 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 082305-9167 Site Address : 919 HOUSER WY N Total Fees : 1,201. 92 This Payment 1.92 Total ALL Pmts : 1,201 . 92 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 05 . 519 . 90 .42 . 1 Postage 1.92