HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR_Arborist Report_New Life #2_231117_v1.pdfWASHINGTON FORESTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
FORESTRY AND VEGETATION MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS W F C I
O: 360/943-1723
C: 360/561-4407
9136 Yelm Hwy SE
Olympia, WA 98513
URBAN/RURAL FORESTRY • TREE APPRAISAL • TREE RISK ASSESSMENT
RIGHT-OF-WAYS • VEGETATION MANAGEMENT • FOREST/TREE MGT. PLANS • EXPERT TESTIMONY
Member of International Society of Arboriculture and Society of American Foresters
MEMO TO: Alex Morganroth
Senior Planner
City of Renton
FROM: Washington Forestry Consultants
DATE: November 15, 2023
RE: New Life Church Tree Replacement Calculations
Mr. Morganroth:
We have completed the City of Renton Tree Retention and Credit Worksheet for the New Life
Church project. All reasonable efforts have been taken to preserve trees utilizing the highest
priority possible per Renton Municipal Code. The project is planning to remove three trees in the
existing parking lot and five trees along the Maple Valley Hwy frontage to construct the proposed
project. All remaining trees on the site will be preserved.
The subject parcel is 55.14-acres in size with 34.46-acres preserved in critical areas. Most of the
remaining 20.68-arces has been developed with the existing church buildings, parking lots, and
open fields. Small parts of non-critical acreage have been preserved as forested areas.
A tally of trees was completed in the developed portion of the site and twelve variable area plots
were installed on a systematic grid in the critical areas to determine the size and total number of
trees on the parcel. The plot locations are marked in the field with orange flagging. Data from the
plots were entered into SuperAce®, a forest inventory software program that projected the total
number of significant trees in those stands. See Attachment 1 for a map of the site showing critical
areas and proposed tree retention.
New Life Church Tree Retention Memo
Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 2
The calculated minimum density for the site is 620 tree credits and 114 significant trees. The
current site plan retains 371 significant trees on the site totaling 2,211 tree credits. This exceeds
the minimum density by 257 trees and 1,591 tree credits. No tree replacement is required.
Please give us a call if you have any questions.
Respectfully submitted,
Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc.
Galen M. Wright, ACF, ASCA Joshua Sharpes
ISA Bd. Certified Master Arborist PN-129BU Professional Forester
Certified Forester No. 44 ISA Certified Arborist®,
ISA Tree Risk Assessor Qualified Municipal Specialist, PN- 5939AM
ASCA Tree and Plant Appraisal Qualified ISA Tree Risk Assessor Qualified
New Life Church Tree Retention Memo
Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 3
Attachment 1. Map of New Life Church Site With Trees Saved by Area
Parcel Boundary
Critical Areas
Non-critical Areas
147 trees
721 credits
135 trees
742 credits
89 trees
748 credits
3,914 trees
New Life Church Tree Retention Memo
Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 4
Attachment 2. City of Renton Tree Retention and Credit Worksheet
3 pages
rentonwa.gov/permitcenter | planningcustomerservice@rentonwa.gov | 425-430-7294 10/6/2022 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF RENTON Ι PERMIT CENTER
TREE RETENTION AND CREDIT WORKSHEET
TREE RETENTION REQUIREMENTS
A minimum retention of thirty percent (30%) of all significant trees (as defined in RMC 4-11-200) is required on site.
Please complete the form below to verify compliance with minimum tree retention requirements.
• Identify total number of trees 6-inch caliper or greater (or alder or
cottonwood trees 8-inch caliper or greater) on site: Trees
Trees
Trees
Trees
Trees
Trees Required
Trees Proposed
•Deductions – Certain trees are excluded from the retention calculation:
o Trees that are high-risk, as defined in RMC 4-11-200:
o Trees within existing and proposed public right-of-way:
o Trees within wetlands, streams, very high landslide hazards,
protected slopes, and associated buffers:
•Total remaining trees after deductions:
•Required tree retention (30%):
•Identify number of trees proposed for retention:
•Identify number of trees requested for replacement in lieu of retention
(skip page 3 if no tree replacement is requested):Trees
TREE CREDIT REQUIREMENTS
Tree credit requirements apply at a minimum rate of thirty (30) credits per net acre. Complete the form below to
determine minimum tree credit requirements.
•Gross area of property in square feet: Square Feet
•Deductions: Certain areas are excluded from tree credit calculation:
o Existing and proposed public right-of-way: Square Feet
o Wetlands, streams, very high landslide hazards, protected slopes,
and associated buffers: Square Feet
•Total excluded area:Square Feet
•Net land area (after deductions) in square feet:Square Feet
•Net land area (after deductions) in acres:Acres
•Required tree credits:Tree Credits Required
rentonwa.gov/permitcenter | planningcustomerservice@rentonwa.gov | 425-430-7294 10/6/2022 Page 2 of 3
TREE RETENTION AND CREDIT WORKSHEET
PROPOSED TREE CREDITS
Please complete the table below to calculate the total tree credits proposed for your project. Identify the quantity of trees
for each tree category, after deducting trees within excluded areas, as shown in the previous section.
TREE SIZE TREE CREDITS TREE QUANTITY TOTAL TREE CREDITS
RETAINED TREES
Preserved tree 6 – 9” caliper 4
Preserved tree 10 – 12” caliper 5
Preserved tree 12 – 15” caliper 6
Preserved tree 16 – 18” caliper 7
Preserved tree 19 – 21” caliper 8
Preserved tree 22 – 24” caliper 9
Preserved tree 25 – 28” caliper 10
Preserved tree 29 – 32” caliper 11
Preserved tree 33 – 36” caliper 12
Preserved tree 37” caliper and greater 13
NEW TREES
New small species tree (30' or less at maturity) 0.25
New medium species tree (30' to 50' at maturity)
1
New large species tree (50' or more at maturity) 2
TREE CREDITS PROPOSED:
rentonwa.gov/permitcenter | planningcustomerservice@rentonwa.gov | 425-430-7294 10/6/2022 Page 3 of 3
TREE RETENTION AND CREDIT WORKSHEET
TREE REPLACEMENT JUSTIFICATION
Replacement may be authorized as an alternative to 30% retention provided the removal is the minimum necessary to
accomplish the desired purpose and provided the proposal meets one of the following options:
a. There are special circumstances related to the size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings of the subject
property; or
b. The strict application of the code would prevent reasonable use of property; or
c. The strict application of the code would prevent compliance with minimum density requirements of the zone; or
d. The project is a short plat with four (4) or fewer lots.
Please attach a written justification demonstrating compliance with the requirements and criteria as descripted above.
TREE REPLACEMENT QUANTITY
Tree replacement quantity is determined based on the credit value of the trees proposed for removal. Larger, higher
priority trees shall be used for calculation of tree replacement. Identify the quantity of each tree requested to be removed
in lieu of 30% retention, based on tree size. List the identification number of each tree, as indicated in the arborist report.
TREE SIZE TREE CREDITS TREE QUANTITY TREE INDENTIFICATION # TOTAL TREE CREDITS
Tree 37” caliper + 13
Tree 33 – 36” caliper 12
Tree 29 – 32” caliper 11
Tree 25 – 28” caliper 10
Tree 22 – 24” caliper 9
Tree 19 – 21” caliper 8
Tree 16 – 18” caliper 7
Tree 12 – 15” caliper 6
Tree 10 – 12” caliper 5
Tree 6 – 9” caliper 4
REPLACEMENT CREDITS REQUIRED:
TREE REPLACEMENT PLANTING
Identify the quantity of proposed new replacement trees (minimum size of 2-inch caliper). The total replacement credits
proposed should be equal to or greater than the replacement credits required, as shown in the previous section.
TREE SIZE TREE CREDITS TREE QUANTITY TOTAL TREE CREDITS
New small species tree (30' or less at maturity) 0.25
New medium species tree (30' to 50' at maturity)
1
New large species tree (50' or more at maturity) 2
REPLACEMENT CREDITS PROPOSED:
New Life Church Tree Retention Memo
Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 5
Attachment 3. Critical Areas Stand Summary Reports
New Life Church Tree Retention Memo
Washington Forestry Consultants, Inc. Page 6