Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
RES 4513
RESOLUTION NO. 4513 EXHIBIT A 2023-2024 City of Renton Fee Schedule brochure City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 Rev. July 2023 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 Table of Contents Page SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES 1 SECTION II. MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE 2 SECTION III. CITY CENTER PARKING FEES 2 SECTION IV. AQUATIC FEES 3 SECTION V. CARCO THEATER (REPEALED) 3 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL 3 SECTION VII. COMMUNITY CENTER PASS CARD & FEES 4 SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES 4 SECTION IX. ANIMAL LICENSES FEES* ‐ RMC 5‐4‐24 SECTION X. BUSINESS LICENSES 5 SECTION XI. ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES 5 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES 6 Building Fees:6 Land Use Review Fees:8 Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: 10 Technology Surcharge Fee 14 Impact Fees: 14 Miscellaneous Fees: 15 SECTION XIII. FIRE DEPARMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES (RFA) 15 16SECTION XIV. MONETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRACTIONS ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 7.80 RCW City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES1 2023 2024 1. Maps: a.$4 $4 b. $12 $12 c. $4 $4 d. $12 $12 e. $5 $5 2. Plat: a. $2 $2 b. $1 $1 3. Photocopies: a. $0.15 $0.15 b. $0.20 $0.20 c. $0.25 $0.25 4. Budget: a. $10 $10 b. N/C N/C 5. Audio or Video Recording Copies: a.$2 $2 b.$2 $2 6. Regulations and Plans: a.Comprehensive Plan and Map $30 $30 b.Title IV, Development Regulations: (i) Text and Zoning Map $110 $110 (ii) Text only $100 $100 c.Individual Chapters of Development Regulations $10 $10 d. Renton Municipal Code (two volumes)$400 $400 e.Code Supplements, per year: (i) Titles I ‐ III and VI ‐ X $70 $70 (ii) Title IV $70 $70 7. Miscellaneous Services: a.Certification and Notary Fees ‐ Clerk's Certification $10 $10 b.Notary Public Attestation or Acknowledgement or as $10 $10 otherwise provided for in RCW 42.28.090, per signature c.Hold Harmless Agreements and other similar documents $20 $20 not otherwise provided for d.Lamination of licenses, pictures $6 $6 e.Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Loan Program: (i) Application Fee $200 $200 (ii) Loan Origination Fee $150 or 0.25% of loan amount, whichever is greater $150 or 0.25% of loan amount, whichever is greater (iii) Closing Costs (including any legal fees)50% of total actual costs 50% of total actual costs 8. Miscellaneous Charges for Police Services: a.Police Reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Record Checks (Written Response) $5 $5 c.Photographs ‐ Digital on CD $2 $2 d.Photographs ‐ black & white or color ‐ Cost of developing film Cost Cost e.Fingerprint Cards $5 $5 (i) Each additional card $1 $1 9. Charges for Fire Documents: a.Fire reports per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Fire investigative report on CD $2 $2 c.First copy ‐ black & white or color ‐ Cost of developing film Cost Cost d.Additional copy ‐ black & white or color ‐ Cost of developing film Cost Cost 10. Computer Listings: a.City of Renton new business list $10 $10 b.List of all business licenses $20 $20 c.Copies requested to be faxed, local number $3 $3 d.Copies requested to be faxed, long distance number (i) Multi‐family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1 $10 $10 (ii) Six (6) or more pages (ten (10) page limit)$20 $20 11. Utility Fee: a.Special Request Water Meter Reading $30 $30 b.Utility New Account Setup $25 $25 c.Utility Billing Account Transfer (tenant billing form)$5 $5 d.Water utility outstanding balance search requested by $25 $25 fax, messenger, or letter e Water turn off and turn on fee $60 $60 f Water utility shutoff list processing fee $60 $60 g Water delinquent late fee of 10% of past due charges but not less than fifty cents 10% 10% h Water after hours service charge to turn on water after 3 p.m. (additional fee)$90 $90 i Tenant notification fee for impending shutoff of water per tenant $5 $5 j Petition filing fee for stormwater appeal from category determination and assessment $75 $75 k Meter Accuracy Reading ‐ For testing 3/4" through 2" meter $40 $40 l Meter Accuracy Reading ‐ For testing meters larger than 2"Time & Materials, requires Time & Materials, requires a $60 refundable deposit a $60 refundable deposit prior to test prior to test 12. Schedule of Fines for False Alarms ‐ Security/Burglar: (effective February 1, 2019) a.$25 $25 b.N/C N/C c.N/C N/C d.$100 $100 e.$250 $250 f.$25 $25 g.$50 $50 1 A registration year shall mean January 1 thru December 31 each year. 13. NSF Check Fees $25 $25 SECTION I. MISCELLANEOUS FEES1 (CONTINUED)2023 2024 14. Veteran Park Tile: Three lines $75 $75 15. Electronic Records1,2,3: Late Payment Fee Unregistered Alarm System Fee First False Alarm in a registration year1 One‐time Registration Fee Annual Registration Renewal Second False Alarm in a registration year1 Third or more False Alarm in a registration year1 Audio recording, each copy Video recording, each copy City's Budget to other municipality or quasi‐municipal corporation or other nonprofit charitable or education organization City's Budget Zoning maps ‐ standard 11 x 17 Zoning maps ‐ large 24 x 36 Comprehensive Plan map ‐ standard 11 x 17 Comprehensive Plan map ‐ large 24 x 36 Precinct maps First page Each additional page Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" Each 11" x 17" Each 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" color City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 a.Photocopies or printed copies of electronic records, per page $0.15 $0.15 b.Scanning paper records, per page $0.10 $0.10 c.$0.05 $0.05 d.$0.10 $0.10 e.Body worn camera footage redaction, per minute of documented staff time, plus other documented costs of redaction $0.64 $0.64 16. Document Recording Fees: a.Actual Costs Actual Costs b.Actual Costs Actual Costs 17. Publication Fees: Actual Costs Actual Costs SECTION II. MAPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE 2023 2024 1. a.Weekday: (i) 18 Hole $43 $43 (ii) 9 Hole $32 $32 (iii) 18 Hole, Senior $34 $34 (iv) 9 Hole, Senior $26 $26 (v) 18 Hole, Junior $25 $26 (vi) 9 Hole, Junior $19 $20 b.Weekend: (i) 18 Hole $50 $50 (ii) 9 Hole $32 $35 2. Club Rental1: a.Regular $30 $35 b.Premium $60 $65 3. Golf Cart Fees1: a.18 Hole $36 $38 b.18 Hole Single Rider $28 $28 c.9 Hole $24 $26 d.9 Hole Single Rider $18 $18 e.Trail Fee $15 $15 f.Half Cart, 18 Hole $18 $19 g.Half Cart, 9 Hole $12 $13 4. Driving Range Fees1: a.Large Bucket $13 $14 b.Small Bucket $10 $11 c.Warm‐up Bucket $6 $7 5. Lesson Fees: a.1/2 Hour Private $55 $60 b.1 Hour Private $80 $90 c.1/2 Hour Series Private $200 $220 d.1 Hour Series Private $300 $330 e.Group Series $140 $160 f.1/2 Hour Private, Junior $35 $40 g.Playing Lesson(3‐hole minimum/9‐hole maximum) per hole $25 $30 1 Rates include Washington State Sales Tax (WSST) SECTION III. City CENTER PARKING FEES 2023 2024 1. City Center Parking Garage Fees: Parking rates for retail parking will be as follows: a.Zero (0) ‐ two (2) hours N/C N/C b.Two (2) ‐ four (4) hours $2 $2 c.Four (4) ‐ six (6) hours $4 $4 d.Six (6) ‐ (10) hours $6 $6 e. 10 hours or more $10 $10 f.Monthly pass‐holders, tax included $35 $35 Green Fees1: Transmission of records in an electronic format or for the use of agency equipment to send the records electronically, per gigabyte (GB) Electronic files or attachments uploaded for electronic delivery (email, cloud‐based data storage service, or other means of electronic delivery), for each four (4) files The applicant shall pay all document recording fees charged by King county and all administrative fees charged by the title company for processing. Payment in full shall by submitted to the City before documents are sent for recording 1 The charges identified in RCW 42.56.120(3)(b) (and referenced above) may be combined to the extent that more than one type of charge applies to copies produced in response to a particular request. The actual cost of any digital storage media or device provided by the agency. Alternatively, the City may charge a flat fee of up to $2 for the entire request as long as the cost of uploading and transmitting the electronic records is reasonably estimated to equal or exceed that amount. Only one $2 flat fee per request is authorized for electronic records produced in installments. When records are provided electronically on a CD, DVD, thumb drive, flash drive, or other electronic device, the requestor will be charged for the cost of the electronic storage device. The City may charge an actual‐cost service charge for requests that require use of IT expertise to prepare data compilations or provide customized electronic access services when not used by the City for other purposes. A cost estimate and explanation will be provided to the requestor before incurring the costs. 2 Option to waive charges. The City may waive charges associated with fulfilling a request. The decision will be based on various factors, including the volume and format of the responsive documents. The decision to assess fees for fulfilling a public records request shall be made on a consistent and equitable basis, dependent primarily upon the amount of staff time required for copying, scanning, shipping, uploading, and/or transmitting the records associated with fulfilling a request. 3 Certified copies. If the requestor is seeking a certified copy of a City record, an additional charge of $1.00 per each complete document may be applied to cover the additional expense and time required for certification. 1 Should Section I fees due total less than $4.00 and no other fee is due to the City at the same time, the department administrator may authorize to waive the entire amount due at their discretion. For purposes of this section, "weekend" shall mean Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. "Weekday" shall mean the remaining four days of the week. "Junior" shall mean ages 17 and under, "Senior" shall mean ages 62 and over. Off‐season and promotional rates determined by management; posted on website. The applicant shall pay all Publication fees charged by publication outlet used by the City (The Seattle Times or equivalent). Payment in full shall be made to the City prior to public hearing, permit approval or issuance, whichever comes first Miscellaneous charges associated with document recording, such as courier fees City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 SECTION IV. AQUATIC FEES 2023 2024 1. Admission for the Aquatic Center shall be as follows: a.Regular Session: (i) Infants ‐ under 1 year N/C N/C (ii) Youth ‐ 1 to 4 years $8 $8 (iii) Ages 5 and up $16 $16 (iv) Lap swim ‐ water walking only $5 $7 (v) Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 b.Canopy Rental Fees1: (includes canopy and admission for one leisure swim session): (i) Henry Moses Party Tent #1 (10' x 20' for up to twenty‐five (25) guests on wave pool): (1) Resident Rate, per session $600 $600 (2) Non‐resident Rate, per session $700 $700 (ii) Henry Moses Party Tent #2 (10' x 20' for up to twenty‐five (25) guests): (1) Resident Rate $500 $500 (2) Non‐Resident Rate $600 $600 (iii) Henry Moses Party Tent #3 (10' x 10' for up to ten (10) guests): (1) Resident Rate, per session $250 $250 (2) Non‐resident Rate, per session $300 $300 c.Resident Rate all inclusive1 $3,800 $3,800 d.Non‐resident Rate all inclusive1 $4,800 $4,800 e.Swim Lesson Program: Fees and associated descriptions are published in the "Let's Go Renton " Renton Activities Guide f.End‐of‐year School Party Rentals: (i) Renton School District (1) 001 ‐ 299 students $1,900 $1,900 (2) 300 ‐ 399 students $2,250 $2,250 (3) 400 ‐ 499 students $2,400 $2,400 (4) 500 ‐ 599 students $2,550 $2,550 (ii) Other Schools and Districts (1) 001 ‐ 299 students $2,450 $2,450 (2) 300 ‐ 399 students $2,850 $2,850 (3) 400 ‐ 499 students $3,150 $3,150 (4) 500 ‐ 599 students $3,360 $3,360 1 Sales tax not included in the rental fee 2. Boat Launch Rates: a.Daily resident ‐ 7 days a week $20 $20 b.Daily Non‐resident ‐ 7 days a week $25 $25 c.Overnight resident ‐ 7 days a week $25 $25 d.Overnight Non‐resident ‐ 7 days a week $45 $45 e.Annual parking boat launch permit ‐ resident $70 $70 f.Annual parking boat launch permit ‐ non‐resident $130 $130 g. (i) $110 $110 (ii) $115 $115 SECTION V. CARCO THEATER (REPEALED)2023 2024 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL 2023 2024 1. Outlying Picnic Shelters (Cedar River Trail, Liberty Park, Phillip Arnold Park, Teasdale Park and Heritage Park) Maximum of 50 people: a.Resident 10am‐7pm $150 $150 b.Non‐resident 10am‐7pm $290 $290 2. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (South #1, South #2 and Creekside) Maximum of 75 people: a.Resident 10am‐7pm $150 $150 b.Non‐resident 10am‐7pm $290 $290 e.South Shelters 1 & 2 Resident rate $310 $310 f.South Shelters 1 & 2 Non‐resident rate $610 $610 3. Gene Coulon Beach Park Shelters (North Shelter): a.Resident 10am‐7pm $200 $200 b.Non‐resident 10am‐7pm $360 $360 4. Basketball court rate per hour (Tournament Play Only): a.Resident rate $25 $25 b.Non‐resident rate $30 $30 5. a.Resident rate per hour $25 $25 b.Non‐resident rate per hour $30 $30 c.Temporary Event Permit Fee $85 $85 6. Piazza Park Open Space Event Rental a.Full day rental 10am ‐ 7pm $500 $500 7. Photo Shoots per hour: a.Commercial Film and Photo Shoots per hour $300 $300 8. Electrical Spider Box rental: a. Electrical spider box rental per box, per event, with special event approval $200 $200 Open Space Area in the Parks (Cascade, Teasdale, Phillip Arnold, Cedar River, Earlington, Gene Coulon, Glencoe, Kennydale Lions, Sunset, and Riverview Parks): Fishing Tournaments at Coulon Beach (additional rental fee if using the Pavilion area for weigh in and or electricity at the current rental rate) per event Resident rate Non‐resident rate City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 SECTION VI. PARKS AND FACILITIES USE AND RENTAL (CONTINUED)2023 2024 9. Athletic Field Rental, Lights and Prep Fees: a.Sports field rental per hour ‐ resident $30 $30 b.Sports field rental per hour ‐ non‐resident $36 $36 c.Renton Area Youth Sports Agencies, per hour $8 $8 d.Field prep for softball/baseball ‐ resident per occurrence $35 $35 e.Field prep for soccer ‐ resident per occurrence $50 $50 f.Custom Field prep ‐ resident per occurrence $100 $100 g.Field prep for softball/baseball ‐ non‐resident per occurrence $35 $40 h.Field prep for soccer ‐ non‐resident per occurrence $50 $55 i.Custom Field prep ‐ non‐resident per occurrence $100 $100 j.Field lights all sports ‐ resident per hour $30 $30 k.Field lights all sports ‐ non‐resident per hour $36 $36 10. Banquet & Classroom Rental ‐ Community Center & Senior Activity Center: a.Friday evening 5 hour minimum ‐ resident $750 $750 b.Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum ‐ resident $1,500 $1,500 c.Extra hours ‐ per hour ‐ resident $150 $150 d.Friday 5 hour minimum ‐ non‐resident $900 $900 e.Weekend Rates 10 hour minimum ‐ non‐resident $1,800 $1,800 f.Extra hours ‐ per hour ‐ non‐resident $180 $180 g Banquet Room ‐ Mon ‐ Fri ‐ daytime ‐ resident/hr 3 hour min $100 $100 h Banquet Room ‐ Mon ‐ Fri ‐ daytime ‐ non‐resident/hr 3 hour min $90 $120 i.Damage deposit $550 $550 j Cancellation Fee ‐ Less than 90 days $550 $550 11. Classroom and Gymnasium Rental ‐ Renton Community Center: a.Resident single gym athletic ‐ per hour $50 $50 b.Non‐resident single gym athletic ‐ per hour $60 $60 c.Resident double gym athletic ‐ per hour $100 $100 d.Non‐resident double gym athletic ‐ per hour $120 $120 e.Resident single gym non‐athletic $1,000 $1,000 f.Non‐resident single gym non‐athletic $1,200 $1,200 g.Resident double gym non‐athletic $2,000 $2,000 h.Non‐resident double gym non‐athletic $2,400 $2,400 i.Carpet fee single gym ‐ resident & non‐resident $325 $325 j.Carpet fee double gym ‐ resident & non‐resident $650 $650 k.Classroom resident $40 $40 l.Classroom Non‐resident $48 $48 12. Facility Rental ‐ Neighborhood Center: a.Meeting room ‐ resident $35 $40 b.Gymnasium ‐ resident $35 $40 c.Meeting room ‐ non‐resident $40 $48 d.Gymnasium ‐ non‐resident $40 $48 13. Farmer's Market a.10x10 Lot $40 $40 b.Half Lot $20 $20 c.Application fee $30 $30 d.Electrical fee $5 $5 14. Parklet Rentals a. Parklet Rental including Installation per Occurrence1 $500 $500 15. Outlying Park Buildings (Tiffany Park Building, Kennydale Park Building, Teasdale Park Building) a.6‐hour block ‐ resident $200 $200 b.6‐hour block ‐ non‐resident $240 $240 c.Deposit resident & non‐resident $250 $250 d.Non‐profit fee ‐ per hour (no deposit required)$40 $40 SECTION VII. COMMUNITY CENTER PASS CARD & FEES 2023 2024 Fees and associated descriptions are published and available in the "Let's Go Renton" Recreation Guide. SECTION VIII. AIRPORT CHARGES 2023 2024 1.Airport Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0.08 $0.08 2.JetA Fuel Flow Charge: per gallon $0.10 $0.10 4. 3.T‐Hangar Waitlist wait list, one time fee $100 $100 7. 4.T‐Hangar, Non‐Refundable Move‐in Fee (non‐refundable)$250 $250 5 T‐Hangar Rental Space (monthly) (plus leasehold excise tax)$409.43 $409.43 5. 6.Tie‐down Waitlist wait list, one time fee $25 $25 7 Tie‐down Rental Space (monthly) (plus leasehold excise tax)$106.43 $106.43 8.Penalty for violation of Minimum Standards/Airport Rules & Regulations (each occurrence)$500 $500 9.Penalty for Movement Area Incursions (each occurrence), assessed to sponsor/tenant $500 $500 6. 10.Lost gate card fee per occurrence $50 $50 3. 11.Transient airplane parking (daily)$8 $8 SECTION IX. ANIMAL LICENSES FEES1 ‐ RMC 5‐4‐2 2023 2024 1.Altered Animal Annual License $30 $30 2.Unaltered Animal Annual License $50 $50 3.Economically Qualified Resident Special Lifetime License $0 $0 4.Duplicate Tag $10 $10 1 Long‐Term Right of Way Permit will be required if located within the City Right of Way. See Section XII, Development Fees, of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure: Subsection e of subsection 3, Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees 1 Please note, impounded animals are subject to license fees, microchipping costs, and other out‐of‐pocket costs as specified in RMC 6‐6‐2. City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 SECTION X. BUSINESS LICENSES 2023 2024 1. General Business License: a.Registration Fee $150 $150 b.Appeal of Business License Decision $250 $250 2. Penalties: a.The penalty to reinstate an expired business license $50 $50 b.The penalty for failure to obtain a business license $250 $250 c. SECTION XI. ADULT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES 2023 2024 1. Every person applying for a adult entertainment license shall pay the applicable nonrefundable application fee: a.Adult Entertainment Business License $750 $750 b.Entertainer $75 $75 c.Manager $75 $75 d.License Replacement $10 $10 2. Penalties: a.Civil Penalty, per violation $1,000 $1,000 Failure to pay the license fee within one day after the day on which it is due and payable pursuant to subsection C7 of Chapter 5 of the RMC shall render the business enterprise subject to a penalty of (5%) of the amount of the license fee for the first month of the delinquency and an additional penalty of (5%) for each succeeding month of delinquency, but not exceeding a total penalty of (15%) of the amount of such license fee. 5%‐15% 5%‐15% City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES 2023 2024 1. a. (i)$42 $42 b. (i)$317 $317 (ii)$348 $348 (iii)$254 $254 (iv)$285 $285 (v)$285 $285 (vi)$348 $348 c. (i)65% of permit fee 65% of permit fee (ii)50% of initial plan Check Fee 50% of initial plan Check d. (i)$25 $25 (ii) (1)$6.50 $6.50 (2)$2 $2 e. (i) (1) (a)$269 $269 (b)$285 $285 (2) (a)$209 $209 (b)$221 $221 (c)$26 $26 (d)$209 $209 (e)$93 $93 (ii) (1)$82 $82 (2)$82 + 4.89% of value $82 + 4.89% of value (3)$106.45 + 4.93% of value $106.45 + 4.93% of value Mult $303.78 + 2.58% of value $303.78 + 2.58% of value (5)$1,463.10 + 1.70% of value $1,463.10 + 1.70% of value (6)$4,870.92 + 1.45% of value $4,870.92 + 1.45% of value (7)$15,775.97 + 0.53% of value $15,775.97 + 0.53% of value (iii)$209 $209 (iv) (1)$209 $209 (2)$209 $209 (3)$209 $209 (5) (a)$135 $135 (b)$209 $209 f.$190 $190 Review Fee Temporary Electrical Services Miscellaneous Electrical Fees Multi‐Family, Commercial and Industrial Fees: Fees based on value of work. Residential Fees ‐ Single ‐Family and Duplex State Building Code Fee: Electrical Permit Fees2: Non‐residential projects $1.00 to $500.00 Signs per each Mobile Homes Low Voltage Work (e.g., alarm systems; thermostats; computer, data, or phone lines; fiber optics, cable television, etc.) (4) Job Trailers Building Plan Check Fee1 Building and Demolition Permit Fees:1 Building Fees: (viii) (vii) (vi) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) Base Fee/Valuation $1.00 to $500.00 Valuation $501.00 to $2,000.00 Valuation $2001.00 to 25,000.00 Valuation $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 Valuation $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 Valuation $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 Valuation $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 Valuation $1,000,001.00 and up Combination Building Permit Fees1,2 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). $500.01 to $1,000.00 $1,000.01 to 5,000.00 $5,000.01 to $50,000.00 $50,000.01 to $250,000.00 $250,000.01 to $1,000,000.00 House Moving1 ‐ minimum per hour Inspection Fee: $1,000,000.01 and up Cooling system circuit for new or replaced appliance Up to 200 AMP Over 200 AMP 2 Exemption: Residential telephone communication systems, thermostats, security systems, and cable television installations are exempt from fees 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). 1 This covers only the Building Section inspection of the structure prior to move. There is a separate additional fee charged by the Public Works Department to cover the actual house move permit. A building permit is also required in order to site the structure on the new site. Base Residential Fee Each additional unit after first unit Residential projects: Residential Photovoltaic (PV) Solar Panel Permit fee New Service ‐ Single Family and Duplex1 Service Changes/New Circuits ‐ Single Family and Duplex: Change up to 200 AMP Change over 200 AMP Any new circuits added to above price is per each up to a maximum of $80.00 Minimum fee for remodel/addition of new circuits without a service charge Initial Building Plan Check Fee2 Additional Building Plan Check Fee Plumbing up to 3,000 sq ft Plumbing over 3,000 sq ft Mechanical up to 3,000 sq ft Mechanical over 3,000 sq ft Electrical up to 3,000 sq ft Electrical over 3,000 sq ft 50% of commercial fees Minimum $209 50% of commercial fees Minimum $209 2 Building Plan Check Fee is in addition to the building permit fees, demolition permit fees, and combination building permit fees. The plan check fee is equal to 65% of the building permit fee, or the demolition permit fee, or the combination building permit fee. Includes three (3) review cycles. 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). 2 Combination Building Permit fees are required for each new single family residential structure. $42 + $4.70 x each $100 value $42 + $4.70 x each $100 value $112.57 + $21.63 x each $1,000 value $112.57 + $21.63 x each $1,000 value $610.06 + $15.57 x each $1,000 value $610.06 + $15.57 x each $1,000 value $999.31 + $10.85 x each $1,000 value $999.31 + $10.85 x each $1,000 value $1,541.81 + $8.63 x each $1,000 value $1,541.81 + $8.63 x each $1,000 value $4,993.81 + $7.33 x each $1,000 value $4,993.81 + $7.33 x each $1,000 value $8,659.81 + $5.66 x each $1,000 value $8,659.81 + $5.66 x each $1,000 value $190 on 1st unit / $24 each add'l unit $190 on 1st unit / $24 each add'l unit Inspection Fee For Condominium Conversionsg. City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2023 2024 1. h. (i)$190 $190 (ii)Building Permit Fees Building Permit Fees i. (i)$65 $65 (1)$26 $26 (2) Boiler or Compressor $26 $26 (3)$26 $26 (4) Ventilation/exhaust fan $26 $26 (5) Fuel Gas Piping (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$26 $26 (ii)$96 $96 (1)$45 $45 (2) Boiler or Compressor $96 $96 (3) Refrigeration System $96 $96 (4)$96 $96 (5) Incinerator: Installation or relocation of each $127 $127 (6)$45 $45 (7) Fuel Gas Piping (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$45 $45 j. (i) Residential ‐ Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below $65 $65 (1)$12 $12 (2) Water Service: For meter to house $12 $12 (3) Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping $12 $12 (4) Per drain for rainwater systems $12 $12 (5) Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention $12 $12 (6) Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc.$12 $12 (7) Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment $12 $12 (8) Fuel Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets)$26 $26 (ii) Commercial or Multi‐Family: Plumbing Permit base fee plus itemized fees below $96 $96 (1)$19 $19 (2)$19 $19 (3)$19 $19 (4)$19 $19 (5)$19 $19 (6)$19 $19 (7)$19 $19 (8)$33 $33 (9)$96 $96 k. (i) (1)$317 $317 (2)$317 $317 (ii) (1)$96 $96 (2)$96 $96 (3)$63 $63 (4)$158 $158 (5)$96 $96 (6)$96 $96 l. (i) (1)$158 $158 (2)$158 $158 (3)$158 $158 (4)$175/hr $175/hr (ii) (1)40% 40% (2)50% 50% (3)$158/hr $158/hr (4)5% of Permit Fee 5% of Permit Fee (5)5% of Permit Fee 5% of Permit Fee (iii)2 X Permit Fee 2 X Permit Fee 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). 2 Applies to inspection performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non‐holiday Monday‐Fridays outside the hours of 7:00AM to 3:30PM Decorative Flags fee is per entrance and valid until flag(s) are removed Roof, projecting, awning, canopy, marquee, and wall signs Freestanding ground and pole signs Temporary and Portable Signs: Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap Water Service: For meter to building Mechanical Permit Fees:1 Residential ‐ Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: Commercial or Multi‐Family ‐ Mechanical Permit base fee plus itemized fees below: Within a manufactured home park Manufactured/Mobile Home Installation Fees1: Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code Appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code Outside of a manufactured home park Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents Site Plan/Zoning Review1 Engineering Review1 Fuel Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) Medical Gas Piping: (each gas piping system up to 6 outlets) Sign Permit Fees: Plumbing Permit Fees:1 Per fixture for repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping Per drain for rainwater systems Per lawn sprinkler system, includes backflow prevention Per vacuum breaker or backflow protection device on tanks, vats, etc. Per interceptor for industrial waste pretreatment Miscellaneous Fees: Minimum Housing Inspection Building Fees: (Continued) 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). 1 Includes plan review and inspection fees for the foundation (electrical, plumbing, mechanical, sewer and water connection fees are in addition to the below amounts). WABO ‐ Adult Family Home; Misc building inspection Commercial Hood: Installation of each served by a mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such hood each Heating system (furnace, heat pump, suspended heater, fireplace, wood stove, etc.). A/C system (air conditioner, chiller or Air Handling Unit (VAV) including ducts and vents Reinspection Fee; Misc building inspection Electrical, Plumbing, or Mechanical Permits (percentage of permit fee) Additional Plan Review Fees: Over three review cycles (percentage of plan review fee) Miscellaneous Plan Review: hourly fee. Real Estate Directional Signs, pursuant to RMC 4‐4‐100J2, permit valid for a 12‐months period Grand Opening Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4‐4‐100J6d(i) Per plumbing fixture (e.g., sink, shower, toilet, dishwasher, tub, etc.) or set of fixtures on one trap Work commencing before permit Issuance: Where work for which the permit is required is started prior to obtaining the permit, a special investigation fee in an amount equal to twice the permit fee shall be charged. The special investigation fee shall be paid in addition to the required permit fees Permanent Signs: Inspection Fees: Plan Review Fees: Event Signs, pursuant to RMC 4‐4‐100J6d(ii) and (iii) per sign, per promotion A‐Frame Signs, pursuant to RMC 4‐4‐100J5 Charge is for the first sign, all subsequent signs are $50.00 Commercial Property Real Estate Banner each sign permit is valid for 12 months. After hours inspection2 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2023 2024 2. (i)$56 $56 (ii)$120 $120 (iii) (1)$5,900 $5,900 (2)$5,900 $5,900 (iv) (1)$560 $560 (2)$560 $560 (3)$560 $560 (v)$5,930 $5,930 (1)$2,965 $2,965 (2)$5,930 $5,930 (vi) (vii)$5,900 $5,900 (viii) (1)$3,710 $3,710 (2)$1,800 $1,800 (3)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (4)Application Fee Application Fee (ix)N/C N/C (x)$1,410 $1,410 (xii)$11,240 $11,240 (xiii)100% of cost 100% of cost (xiv)$1,800 $1,800 (xv)$1,800 $1,800 (xvi)$180 $180 (xvii)$6,080 $6,080 (xviii)$180 $180 (xix)N/C N/C (xx)$570 $570 (xxi)$1,230 $1,230 (xxii) (1)$1,230 $1,230 (2)$3,650 $3,650 (3)$1,800 $1,800 (xxiii)$170 $170 (xxiv) (1)$6,080 $6,080 (2)$3,040 $3,040 (3)$12,170 $12,170 (4)$6,080 $6,080 (5)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (6)Application Fee Application Fee (xxv) (1)$6,080 $6,080 (2)$3,030 $3,030 (xxvi) (1)$570 $570 (2)$1,730 $1,730 (xxvii)N/C N/C (xxviii)$5,900 $5,900 (xxix)$120 $120 (xxx) (1)N/C N/C (2)$3,030 $3,030 Mult $3,650 $3,650 (4)$3,650 $3,650 (xxxi) (1)$4,270 $4,270 (2)$3,030 $3,030 (3)50% of Application Fee 50% of Application Fee (4)Application Fees Application Fees (xxxii)$570 $570 (xxxiii)$3,030 $3,030 (xxxiv) (1)$280 $280 (2)$280 $280 (xxxv) (1)$120 $120 (2)$230 $230 (xxxvi)$1,490 $1,490 (xxxvii)$290 $290 (xxxviii)$540 $540 Preliminary Final Waiver or Modification of Code Requirements cost is per request Zoning Compliance Letter Installation Temporary Use Permits: Tier 1 Tier 2 Variance (per each variance requested) Administrative or Hearing Examiner Application Conditional Use Permit Variance Hearing Examiner Review Administrative Review Site Development Plan (Site Plan or Master Plan which includes design review fee for projects subject to RMC 4‐3‐100): Modification (minor, administrative) Modification (major) required new application and repayment of fee required Small Cell Permit, per site4 Special Permit (Hearing Examiner) Street Naming (Honorary) Substantial Development Permit Planned Urban Development: Preliminary Plan Final Plan Reasonable Use Exception: In conjunction with land use permit Stand alone Public Arts Exemption Rezone Routine Vegetation Management Permit without Critical Areas Shoreline‐Related Permits: Shoreline Permit Exemption Landscape Review Fee Legal Lot Segregation Lot Consolidation Major Plat Amendment Manufactured/Mobile Home Park: Tentative Preliminary Final Open Space Classification Request Plats: Preliminary Short Plat Final Short Plat Preliminary Plat Final Plat Minor Plat Amendment Development Agreement Environmental Impact Statement Cost include the coordination, review and appeal. Draft and Final3 Environmental Checklist Review 100% of contract cost 100% of contract cost General Land Use Review1: Additional Animals Permit Address Change Annexation: Less than 10 acres Administrative Appeal of: Hearing Examiner's Decision Administrative Decision Environmental Decision Binding Site Plan (total fee for both preliminary and final phases) Code Text Amendment Comprehensive Plan Map or Text Amendment (each) Conditional Use Permit: 10 acres or more Land Use Review Fees: HEX Revision (minor, administrative) Revision (major) Critical Areas Exemption Critical Areas Permit (xi) Critical Areas Review Fee: for those projects that propose impacts to critical areas and will be billed at the cost of contract biologist’s review.2 Lot Line Adjustment Environmental (SEPA) Addendum Fence Permit (special) Grading and Filling Permit (Hearing Examiner) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED)2023 2024 2. a. b. (i) Land Use Review Fees: (Continued) Miscellaneous Fees1: General Land Use Review1: (Continued) SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE) 1 Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply, and is hereby adopted by reference. A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk’s office for public review. 1 Exception for Projects Vested in the County: For those projects that have vested to a land use permit under the development regulations of King County, the King County Land Use Review Fee Schedule shall apply, and is hereby adopted by reference. A copy of that fee schedule has been filed with the City Clerk and is available at the City Clerk’s office for public review. 2 Per RMC 4‐3‐050F7, the City may charge and collect fees from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in review of plans, studies, monitoring reports and other documents related to evaluation of impacts to or hazards from critical areas and subsequent code‐required monitoring. 3 When the City is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) determines that the EIS shall be prepared, the City may charge and collect a reasonable fee from any applicant to cover costs incurred by the City in preparing the EIS. The ERC shall advise the applicant(s) of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation; the applicant shall post bond or otherwise ensure payment of such costs. The ERC may determine that the City will contract directly with a consultant for preparation of an EIS, or a portion of the EIS, and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. Such consultants shall be selected by mutual agreement of the City and applicant after a call for proposals. If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required, the ERC shall refund any fees collected under this subsection which remain after incurred costs are paid. The City may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice requirements of this Title relating to the applicant’s proposal. The City shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency. The City may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this Title, and for mailing the document, in a manner provided by chapter 42.17 RCW. 4 Prior to issuance of a small cell permit, the applicant shall pay the actual administrative expenses incurred by the City that are directly related to the City's review of the application, including plan inspection, and approval, as authorized by RCW 35.21.860(1)(b), as may be amended. Permit review staff overtime (applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non‐holiday Monday‐Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule) $175/hr $175/hr City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 2023 2024 3. a. (i) Grade and Fill Quantity Cleared or Disturbed Area < 50 cy < 7,000 sf 50 cy ‐ 499 cy 7,000 sf ‐ < 3/4 acre 500 cy ‐ 4,999 cy 3/4 ac ‐ < 1 ac 5,000 cy ‐ 49,999 cy 1 ac ‐ < 2.5 ac 50,000 cy ‐ 99,999 cy 2.5 ac ‐ < 5 ac 100,000 cy and larger 5 ac and larger (1) (a)N/A N/A (b)$520 $520 (c)$700 $700 (d)$1,050 $1,050 (f)$1,400 $1,400 (e)$1,750 $1,750 (2) (a)N/A N/A (b)$500 $500 (c)$1,000 $1,000 (d)$1,330 $1,330 (f)$2,660 $2,660 (e)$3,990 $3,990 (3)1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (4)1.5 x Review/Intake Fee 1.5 x Review/Intake Fee (ii) (1)6% of cost 6% of cost (2)$9,000 + 5% over $150,000 $9,000 + 5% over $150,000 (3)$17,500 + 4% over $350,000 $17,500 + 4% over $350,000 (iii)0.5% of cost 0.5% of cost (iv) $280 $280 (2)$1,700 $1,700 (v)$3,000 $3,000 b. (i) (1)$1,120 $1,120 (2)$2,250 $2,250 (3)$4,500 $4,500 (ii) (1)15% of total 15% of total (2)10% of total 10% of total (3)5% of total 5% of total (iii)$840 $840 c. (i) (1) (a)$4,850 $4,850 (b)$648 $648 (c)$3,650 $3,650 (2) (a)$24,250 $24,250 (b)$3,238 $3,238 (c)$18,250 $18,250 (3) (a)$38,800 $38,800 (b)$5,181 $5,181 (c)$29,200 $29,200 $150,000.00 or less Over $150,000.00 but less than $350,000.00 $350,000.00 and over Site Plan/Zoning Review and Inspection Fee6,7 1 Fees are based on the amount covered by the Latecomers'. Water service fee1,4 Fire sprinkler service fee 2,3 Wastewater fee1,4 $200,000 and over Annual Licenses of Solid Waste Fills Review Fee1,2: SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) New or Replaced Hard Surface < 2,000 sf 2,000 sf ‐ 4,999 sf 5,000 sf ‐ < 1 ac 1 ac ‐ < 2.5 ac 2.5 ac ‐ < 5 ac 5 ac and larger Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: Site Work and Civil Construction Fees: Tier 0 1 2 3 4 5 Clearing, Grading, Excavation, and Mining Permits and License Fees: Fees shall be based on the highest tier 7 Cost of improvements shall be based on the City's bond quantity worksheet and shall include all project related improvements outside of the building envelopes, including, but not limited to, all costs required to construct the following: paved parking lots, private sidewalks or walkways; private and public storm water management facilities; temporary erosion and sedimentation control facilities; water quality facilities; public and private streets; public and private sanitary sewers; public water main improvements; required off‐site street, bike and pedestrian improvements; street lighting improvements; required landscaping and street tree improvements; and site grading and mobilization costs. The applicant may elect to submit a separate, itemized cost estimates for each item of improvement subject to the approval by the City. 1‐1/2 inch: Multi‐family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1 $50,000 or less Wastewater fee4 2 inch: Water service fee4 Water service fee4 Civil construction plan review and inspection fees6,7,8: 8 Fifty Percent (50%) of the fee is due at Civil Construction Permit Application and the remaining shall be due prior to permit issuance. Wet weather (annual fee) 5 If deemed necessary by the City in its sole discretion, the City will contract with one or more consultants to provide plan reviews and/or inspections with the related costs and expenses payable by the applicant. 3 All developers, municipal or quasi‐municipal entities, or utility corporations or companies, except those specifically exempted, shall pay fees under this Section. Exempted entities include City‐franchised cable TV, cable modem, natural gas, telecommunications, and electrical power. Plan Revision following Permit Issuance: (1)Minor (Results in a change 10% or less than the cost of improvements7. Excludes minor adjustments that are approved by the City to be shown on record drawings.) Major (Results in a change of greater than 10% of the cost of improvements 7.) 6 The fee shall be based up percentage of the estimated cost of improvements. 1 The fee for a grading license authorizing additional work to that under a valid license shall be the difference between the fee paid for the original license and the fee shown for the entire project. 2 Any unused fee may be carried forward to the next year. If any work is done before the license is issued, the grading license fee shall be doubled. Segregation processing fee, if applicable Over $50,000 but less than $200,000 4 Includes three (3) review cycles. Additional reviews will be charged $1,700 each. 5/8 x 3/4 inch and 1 inch: Water and Wastewater System Development Charges (SDC): Utility System Development Charges (SDC): 2 The administration and collection fee is deducted from each individual latecomer fee payment and the balance forwarded to the holder of the latecomer’s agreement pursuant to RMC 9‐5, Tender of Fee. Latecomers' Agreement Application Fees1: Processing fee2 (Nonrefundable) $50,000 or less Over $50,000 but less than $200,000 $200,000 and over Fire sprinkler service fee 2,3 Wastewater fee4 Fire sprinkler service fee 2,3 Solid Waste Fills Review Fee1: Inspection/Issuance Fee: Review/Intake Fee: Tier 0 (no permit required) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Tier 0 (no permit required) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 2023 2024 3. c. (4) (a)$77,600 $77,600 (b)$10,362 $10,362 (c)$58,400 $58,400 (5) (a)$121,250 $121,250 (b)$16,191 $16,191 (c)$91,250 $91,250 (6) (a)$242,500 $242,500 (b)$32,383 $32,383 (c)$182,500 $182,500 (7) (a)$388,000 $388,000 (b)$51,812 $51,812 (c)$292,000 $292,000 (ii) (1)$2,300 $2,300 (3)$0.920 per sq foot $0.920 per sq foot (iii)$840 + administrative costs $840 + administrative costs (iv) d. (i) (1) (a)$50 $50 (c)Time and materials Time and materials (d)$275 $275 (e)$95 $95 (f)$250 $250 (g)$560 $560 (h)$1,025 $1,025 (i)$80 $80 (k)$185 $185 (n)Time and materials Time and materials (o)$50 $50 (p)$200 $200 (2) (a) (i)$2,875 $2,875 (ii)$400 $400 (b) (i)$2,935 $2,935 (ii)$400 $400 (c) (i)$2,875 $2,875 (ii)$460 $460 (d) (i)$4,605 $4,605 (ii)$750 $750 6 Temporary connection may be granted for a one‐time, temporary, short‐term use of a portion of the property for a period not to exceed three (3) consecutive years. Fee shall be paid annually (non‐prorated), and shall be nonrefundable, nontransferable (from one portion of the property to another) and shall not constitute a credit to the system development charge due at the time of permanent use of the utility system. The application for temporary connection shall consist of a detailed plan and a boundary line of the proposed development service area for use in the fee determination. (b) (j) $250 + $0.15 per lineal foot Cost of test + $70 processing fee Cost of test + $70 processing fee $60 deposit + time and materials $60 deposit + time and materials Water meter tests on meters 2" or larger Specialty water tests (lead, copper, etc) Water main connections $2,000 deposit + time and materials Installation of isolation valve. Open and close fire hydrants for fire flow tests conducted by others. Water service disconnection (cut at main) Water Construction Permit Fees: Miscellaneous water installation fees. Service size reductions Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 30% of SDC 30% of SDC 30% of SDC Fire sprinkler service fee 2,3 Wastewater fee4 4 inch: Storm Water System Development Charges (SDC): New single family residence (including mobile/manufactured homes) & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1 Storm Water Fee; Fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to that portion of the property. Water service fee4 6 inch: $0.920 per sq foot Wastewater Fee; Annual fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary domestic water meter(s). Utility SDC Segregation Request5 Meter resets Repair of damage to service Water meter tests for 3/4” to 2" meter Water Testing, Construction, and Administration Fees: Drop in meter only Drop in meter only Drop in meter only Drop in meter only Water Fee; Annual fee equal to thirty percent (30%) of the current SDC applicable to the size of the temporary water meter(s). (2) (3) (1) Utility Construction Permit Fees: 5 The applicant shall pay the City’s administrative costs for the preparation, processing and recording of the partial payment of the fee(s). If the same segregation is used for more than one utility’s special assessment district, and/or latecomer’s charge, then only one administrative fee is collected. Utility System Development Charges (SDC): (Continued) 30% of SDC 30% of SDC 30% of SDC Fire sprinkler service fee 2,3 Wastewater fee4 8 inch: $0.920 per sq footAddition to existing single family residence greater than 500 square feet (including mobile/manufactured homes) Fee not to exceed $2,300 3 inch: Water service fee4 All other uses charge per square foot of new impervious surface, but not less than $2,300 Fire sprinkler service fee 2,3 Wastewater fee4 Water service fee4 Fire sprinkler service fee 2,3 Wastewater fee4 Water service fee4 2 Based upon the size of the fire sprinkler service (NOT detector bypass meter) Temporary Utility Connection6: (2) $2,000 deposit + time and materials Water main cut and cap Installation of stub service and meter setter only. $250 + $0.15 per lineal foot Water meter installation fees – City installed: Installation fees for ring and cover castings 1 This fee shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%) for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). 4 Any parcel that currently has water and or sewer service is eligible for a prorated system development charge is eligible for credit of the existing connection. Fee(s) based upon meter(s) proposed for final project will be reduced by the fee(s) based upon meter existing on site. 3 Unless a separate fire sprinkler service is provided, the system development charge(s) shall be based upon the size of the meter installed and a separate Fire sprinkler service fee will not be charged. (l) (m) Water quality/inspection/purity tests Water turn ons/offs after hours New water line chlorination fee. Fee plus $0.15 per lineal foot for any footage after the first two hundred fifty (250) lineal feet Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 1” meter installed by the City.2 Installation of stub service and meter setter only. 1‐1/2" meter installed by the City. 3/4” meter installed by City outside City limits2 3/4” meter installed by City within City limits.2 SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 2023 2024 3. d. (e) (i)$4,735 $4,735 (ii)$950 $950 (4) (a)$50 $50 (b) (i)$500 $500 (ii)$2,000 $2,000 (iii)$25 $25 (c) (i)$50 $50 (ii)$250 $250 (ii) (1) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (2) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (3) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (4) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (5) (a)$375 $375 (b)$375 $375 (6)$375 $375 $375 $375 (iv)$525 $525 (v) (1)$500 $500 (2)$1,000 $1,000 e. (i) (1)$5,620 $5,620 (2) (a)$670 $670 (b)$670 + Time and Materials $670 + Time and Materials (c)$670 $670 (3) (a)Time and Materials Time and Materials (b)$135 $135 (c)$850 deposit + Time and Materials $850 deposit + Time and Materials (i) (1)$715.38 $715.38 (2)$1,430.76 $1,430.76 (3)$2,146.14 $2,146.14 (4)$2,861.51 $2,861.51 (5)$3,576.89 $3,576.89 (ii)Actual cost Actual cost (e)$270 $270 (f)Actual cost Actual cost (4) (a)$10.00 $10.00 (b)$20.00 $20.00 (c)$30.00 $30.00 (ii) (1)$370 $370 (2)$700 $700 (3)$375 $375 Surface water permit fee Repair or modification of any of the above Street light system fee, per new connection to power system Utility Locate Refresh Fee (Fee is due each time excavator calls in for locate refresh during 45‐day locate ticket) Ground water discharge (temporary connection to wastewater system for discharge of contaminated ground water over 50,000 gallons) Rate plus billed for current Renton and King County sewer rate on discharged amount (meter provided by property owner) Drop in meter only Hydrant Meter fees: Hydrant meter permit fee Deposits: 2” meter installed by the City. $220 (3) Water meter processing fees – Applicant installed: For meters larger than 2”, the applicant must provide materials and install the meter. $220 Installation of stub service and meter setter only. SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) Utility Construction Permit Fees: (Continued) Large project locate Surface water permit fee 3/4” meter and backflow prevention assembly. 3” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Deposit processing charge, nonrefundable. Meter rental (begins on day of pickup): 3/4” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. 3” meter and backflow prevention assembly. Per month. Wastewater and Surface Water Construction Permit Fees1: Residential: Wastewater permit fee Wastewater permit fee Right of Way (ROW) Use Permits Fees1 Small work, including trenching less than 60 linear feet or installation of 6 or less utility poles 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). Master Service Agreement Application Fee3 (7) 2 This fee shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%) for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). Cut and Cap/Demolition Permit: Wastewater permit fee Surface water permit fee Reinspection for Wastewater or Surface Water Permits All other reimbursement Tier 2, conduit outside of planter strips excluding signalized intersection crossings, bridges and train tracks Short‐Term ROW Permit Fees (duration 30 days or less)2,7: Public Reimbursement (any costs incurred by the City on behalf of the permit applicant for installation or operation of site equipment) All other fees6 Tier 1, Daily peak kWh <20 Tier 2, Daily peak kWh 21 ‐ 40 Tier 3, Daily peak kWh 41 ‐ 60 Tier 4, Daily peak kWh 61 ‐ 80 Tier 5, Daily peak kWh >81 (d) Site License Addendum Rent Conduit Lease Rates per Lineal Foot (annual fee): Tier 1, conduit in existing planter strips Electrical service (annual fee) Single family residence, one unit only All other uses, excluding those listed Wastewater or storm water service Tier 3, conduit within signalized intersection crossings, bridges and train tracks All other work, permit fee plus staff time per hour6 Other public agencies constructing utilities within City right‐of‐way Small Cell Master Lease Agreement including Site License Addendum and Small Cell Permits Master Lease Agreement Administrative Costs, Staff time per hour and/or cost of materials.6 Pole Reservation, per pole Administrative Fee, Base plus time and/or cost of materials.6 plus King County sewer rate on discharged amount plus King County sewer rate on discharged amount Franchise Permit Fees: 4,5 Surface water permit fee Commercial: Wastewater permit fee Surface water permit fee Industrial: Wastewater permit fee Standard locate Franchise Permit Fees: City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 2023 2024 3. e. (iii) (1) (b) (i)$1,025 $1,025 (ii)$1,025 $1,025 (2) (i) (iv)$10 $10 f. (i)$280 $280 (ii)$280 $280 g. (i)$560 $560 (ii) (1)$840 $840 (2)$1,410 $1,410 (3)$2,250 $2,250 h. (i) (1) (a)$130/LF $130/LF (b)$150/LF $150/LF (ii)$158 $158 (iii)$158 $158 (iv)$158/hr $158/hr (v)$175/hr $175/hr (vi)$175/hr $175/hr (vii)Actual cost Actual cost (viii)$670 $670 2 Unscheduled work includes, but is not limited to, site work that is found to be occurring, or did occur, for which an inspection was not scheduled. Fee is subject to be applied for each occurrence but does not replace a stop work order or other code violation as determined applicable by the City. The fee is in addition to any other applicable inspection fees. The fee may provide day of inspection at the discretion and availablility of the City inspector. Street with existing conveyance ditch 2 Work and/or use of the right of way, including those associated with a Civil Construction Permit and excludes utilities from other public agencies and service providers which shall be considered under a franchise permit. Short‐Term ROW Permit Fee + LET9 Short‐Term ROW Permit Fee + LET9 Within City Limits8; Short‐Term ROW Permit Fee associated with use plus leasehold excise tax (LET)9 Service Installation Only Utility Extension per 100' of Length (Min 200' Length) All uses without public benefit; fee is a per month charge assessed annually based on property value 12 of land to be utilized, plus leasehold excise tax9, if applicable. (a) Long Term ROW Permit Fees (duration over 30 days)2: SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees: (Continued) Right of Way Use Permits Fees1 (Continued) 10 Insurance Required: Public Liability and property damage insurance is also required pursuant to RMC 9‐2‐5B, Minimum Permit Requirements for Excess Right‐of‐Way Use. King County ROW Permits/Inspections: Single family and two family uses11; fee assessed annually plus leasehold excise tax (LET)9, if applicable Duration greater than thirty (30) days but no more than one (1) year: Duration greater than one (1) year8,10: 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9(ii) $50 + LET9 $50 + LET9 5 Applies only if permit review is requested by the applicant to be performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non‐holiday Monday‐Fridays outside of the hours of city staff regular work schedule 6 Any work performed by City forces or under City contract on behalf of a permit applicant to repair damage to the City infrastructure or caused by the permit applicant or contractor under its control, or any and all roadway or right‐of‐way cleanup efforts performed by City forces or under City contract that resulted from the work performed by the permit applicant or contractors under its control. 1 Bond required pursuant to RMC 9‐10‐5 3 The fixed application fee established herein is intended to cover the City’s internal administrative costs in processing and administering the franchise. In addition to the fixed application fee, the City may require applicants to either directly pay or reimburse the City for external costs reasonably incurred to process the application and/or administer the franchise agreement. The City may require applicants to deposit funds in advance to cover legal and/or other professional services fees as they are incurred. 4 The City may decide to contract with a consultant to perform plan reviews and inspections and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. 5 If a franchise agreement does not specify the fee amount, the generic fee, as identified in this fee schedule, shall be collected. 6 Regular hours and standard after hour and overtime fees apply. 11 Except those single family and two family uses that utilize right of way along a waterfront. 12 Right‐of‐way value shall be based on the assessed value of the land adjoining the property as established by the King County Assessor. Street with existing storm drainage main line Public Works Reimbursement6 Standard or minor drainage adjustment review All eligible uses except Single Family Additions less than 1,160 sq ft: 7A no fee permit may be issued for the following: individual homeowners performing work in street ROW for street tree or parking strip irrigation systems; residential moving pods or moving trucks provided that they are in the ROW for no more than three (3) days; use in CD zone provided ground disturbing activity is not proposed; and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. 8 A no fee permit may be issued for the following: A public agency and when the proposed use of the right‐of‐way provides a direct service to the public (e.g., Metro applications for right‐of‐way for bus shelters); and work associated with City of Renton capital improvement projects or City funded projects. 9 Leasehold excise tax (LET) imposed pursuant to Chapter 82.29A RCW on leasehold interests for the use of real or personal public property shall be collected from the permittee at a rate established by the State of Washington. 3 Applies only to those fees that are noted as time and materials and performed during city staff regular work schedule. Single Family Additions less than 1,160 Sq Ft: Proportional share of the fee in lieu of all eligible uses fee based on square footage of addition. (2)(Sq Ft of addition / 1,160 sq ft) of Fee‐in‐lieu (Sq Ft of addition / 1,160 sq ft) of Fee‐in‐lieu Permit review staff overtime5 Regular Staff Review and Inspection Hours3 4 Applies to inspections performed on Saturdays, Sundays, observed City of Renton holidays, and non‐holiday Monday‐Fridays outside the hours of 7:00am to 3:30pm. Inspection for Unscheduled Work2 After hours inspection4 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). Oversize Load Permits (iii)All other uses; fee is a per year charge of assessed value of land adjoining the property12, plus leasehold excise tax9, if applicable. In no case less than $50.00. 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 0.5% x Value12 + LET9 Processing and completion fee, payable upon Council approval of the vacation and upon administrative determination of appraised value of vacated right‐of‐way. Appraised Value of Vacated right‐of‐way: Street and Alley vacation Fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9‐14 RMC, Vacations. Release of easement fees: The imposition, collection, payment and other specifics concerning this charge are detailed in chapter 9‐1 RMC, Easements. Filing fee Processing fee Filing fee Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $75,000 Re‐inspection Fee Over $75,000 Street Frontage Improvements Fee‐In‐Lieu:1 Miscellaneous Fees: City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 2023 2024 4. 5.0% 5.0% 5. a. (i) (1)$11,377 $11,377 $15,510 (2)$4,718 $4,718 $3,514 (ii) (1)$0.00 $0.00 (2)$0.00 $0.00 (iii) (1)$2,911 $2,911 $2,161 (2)$3,697 $3,697 $4,257 (iv)5% x School Impact Fee 5% x School Impact Fee b. ITE Land Use Codes (i)$10.68 $10.68 (ii) (i)ITE LUC 220 7550.02 $0.00 7550.02 $0.00 (iii) (ii)ITE LUC 560 $6.02 6.02 $4.79 (iv) (iii)ITE LUC 936 $248.51 248.51 $175.21 (v) (iv)ITE LUC 937 $261.04 261.04 $211.59 (vi) $6,345.23 $6,345.23 (vii) (v)ITE LUC 851 $249.31 249.31 $207.87 (viii) (vi)ITE LUC 565 $54.94 54.94 $19.81 (ix) (vii)ITE LUC 975 $69.16 69.16 $14.58 (x) (viii)ITE LUC 912 $157.10 157.1 $120.84 (ix)ITE LUC 930 $68.10 (x)ITE LUC 933 $159.44 159.44 $180.23 (xi)ITE LUC 934 $203.13 203.13 $182.87 (xii)ITE LUC 945 $73,411.90 73411.9 $89,966.30 (xiii)ITE LUC 944 $98,150.27 798150.27 $87,536.72 (xiv)ITE LUC 110 $10.68 $6.36 (xv) (xv)ITE LUC 710 $16.39 16.39 $14.07 (xvi) (xvi)ITE LUC 492 $40.49 40.49 $35.23 (xvii)ITE LUC 157 $2.57 (xiii)ITE LUC 155 $2.33 (xix)ITE LUC 156 $10.12 (xx)ITE LUC 154 $1.61 (xvii) (xxi)ITE LUC 610 $8.76 8.76 $7.22 (xviii) (xxii)ITE LUC 310 $4,819.16 4819.16 $4,216.05 (xxiii)ITE LUC 130 $5.62 (xix) (xxiv)ITE LUC 140 $8.04 8.04 $10.36 (xx) (xxv)ITE LUC 420 $2,570.22 2570.22 $2,286.67 (xxi) (xxvi)ITE LUC 720 $37.02 37.02 $36.23 (xxii) (xxvii)$2.89 $2.89 (xxiii) (xxiii)ITE LUC 240 $7,228.75 7228.75 $7,068.11 (xxiv) (xxix)ITE LUC 320 $4,417.57 4417.57 $3,001.25 (xxv) (xxx)ITE LUC 445 $722.88 722.88 $786.04 (xxxi)ITE LUC 220 $7,550.02 7,550. 02 $6,184.59 (xxvi) (xxxii)ITE LUC 620 $2,007.98 2007.98 $1,285.11 (xxvii) (xxxiii)ITE LUC 932 $68.51 68.51 $56.02 (xxxiv)ITE LUC 151 $1.50 (xxviii) (xxxv)ITE LUC 251 $3,293.10 3293.1 $3,694.69 (xxix) (xxxvi)ITE LUC 820 $29.88 29.88 $24.37 (xxx) (xxxvii)ITE LUC 210 $12,208.54 12208.54 $11,485.67 (xxxi) (xxxiii)ITE LUC 850 $73.97 73.97 $63.17 (xxxix)ITE LUC 215 $6,345.23 6,345.23 $6,987.79 (xxxx)ITE LUC 150 $3.29 (xxxii) (xxxxii)$8,031.94 $8,031.94 c. (i)$3,276.44 $3,276.44 (ii)$2,659.70 $2,659.70 (iii)$2,531.21 $2,531.21 (iv)$2,222.84 $2,222.84 (v)$2,325.63 $2,325.63 d. (i)$829.77 829.77 $421.98 (ii)$964.53 964.53 $579.41 (iii)$1.29 1.29 $346.22 (iv)$3.92 3.92 $1,052.00 (v)$0.26 0.26 $0.14 Condominium & Duplexes Townhouses, per dwelling Warehouse, per sq foot2 1 ITE LUC: Institutue of Transportation Engineers Land Use Codes defined in the 11th Edition ITE Trip Generation Handbook 2 Impact fees include a Passenger Car‐Equivalent (PCE) factor. 3 Applied fee reductions based on uses by percentage of Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip: Early Learning Facilities (i.e. Daycare) is 20% and Commercial/Retail/Industrial is 88.97% except uses with PCE factors which will remain at 100%. 4 All uses within the Center Downtown (CD) Zone shall be reduced to 20% of the assessed transportation impact fee. General Light Industrial, per sq foot High‐Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage, per sq foot2 High‐Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS), per sq foot2 High‐Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub, per sq foot2 High‐Cube Warehouse: Transload/Short‐Term, per sq foot2 Industrial Park, per sq foot2 Apartment, per dwelling Multifamily Housing, per dwelling Self‐service Storage, per sq foot Technology Surcharge Fee Impact Fees: SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Transportation Impact Fees1,3,4: School Impact Fees: Issaquah School District Single Family Fee Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU) Kent School District Single Family Fee Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU) Renton School District Single Family Fee Multi Family, Duplex, & Accessory Dwelling Fee (ADU)1 School Impact Fee Administration An additional technology surcharge shall be required for all fees included in the following Subsections of Section XII, Development Fees, of the City of Renton Fee Schedule Brochure: Subsection 1, Building Fees; Subsection a, except for appeals, critical areas review fee, and direct EIS costs, of subsection 2, Land Use Review Fees; Subsections a, b, c(iii), d, and e, except Master Franchise/Small Cell Permit Application Fee and Long Term ROW Permit Fees (duration over one year), of subsection 3, Site Work, Utilities, and Right of Way Fees; and Section XIII, Fire Department Fire Marshall Fees 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). Fast food, with drive‐up, per sq foot Light Industrial, per sq foot Apartment, per dwelling & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1, per dwelling Church, per sq foot Coffee/Donut Shop, no drive up, per sq foot Coffee/Donut Shop, with drive up, per sq foot Condominium & Duplexes per dwelling Convenience market ‐ 24 hour, per sq foot Daycare, per sq foot Drinking Place, per sq foot Drive‐in bank, per sq foot Fast food, no drive‐up, per sq foot Fast Casual Dining with 30 seat max, incl. only walk‐up window, per sq foot Park Impact Fees: Single family Multi‐family: 2 units, Duplexes, & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1 Motel, per room Gas station with convenience store, per pump Gas station, per pump General office, per sq foot Health/fitness club, per sq foot Hospital, per sq foot Hotel, per room Manufacturing, per sq foot2 Marina, per boat berth Medical office, per sq foot Mini‐warehouse, per sq foot Mobile home, per dwelling Movie theater, per seat Nursing home, per bed Restaurant: sit‐down, per sq foot Senior housing ‐ detached, per dwelling Shopping center, per sq foot Single family house, per dwelling Supermarket, per sq foot 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). Net New PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip (Proposed ‐ Existing), per PM Peak Hour Person Vehicle Trip Hotel/motel/resort, per sq foot room Medical care facility, per sq foot bed Office, per sq foot 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). Multi‐family: 5 or more units Mobile home Fire Impact Fees: Residential ‐ single family (detached dwellings & duplexes), per dwelling unit Residential ‐ multi family & Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)1, per dwelling unit Multi‐family: 3 or 4 units City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 2023 2024 5. (vi)$1.99 1.99 $0.61 (vii)$1.25 1.25 $0.66 (viii)$2.36 2.36 $0.42 (ix)$5.92 5.92 $1.44 (x)$0.15 0.15 $0.05 (xi)$0.56 0.56 $0.24 (xii)$0.72 0.72 $28.02 (xiii)$4.48 4.48 $0.13 e.$560 $560 f. (i)$100 $100 (ii)$100 $100 6. a.$1,000.00 $1,000.00 b. (i)$225.00 $225.00 (ii)$500.00 $500.00 SECTION XIII. FIRE DEPARMENT FIRE MARSHAL FEES (RFA)2023 2024 a. (i)$50 $50 (ii)$50 + 2% of the cost $50 + 2% of the cost (iii)$75 + 2% of the cost $75 + 2% of the cost (iv)$200 + 1.5% of the cost $200 + 1.5% of the cost (v)$450 + 1.2% of the cost $450 + 1.2% of the cost (vi)$950 + .75% of the cost $950 + .75% of the cost (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) (1)N/C N/C (2)$75 $75 (3)$150 $150 (xi)$35 $35 b. $150 $150 $75 $75 (iii)$250 $250 (vii)$200 $200 (ix)WFC Current Wage and Equipment Rate WFC Current Wage and Equipment Rate (x)$25 $25 $175 $150 $150 Multifamily Tax Exemption Application Tree Fee in lieu, credit replacement, and/or credit supplement Per diameter inch measured at 4.5 feet above grade Labor cost for each 2" caliper (or 6ft tall) tree to be planted Miscellaneous Fees $250 $250 (xi) (viii) Underground tank removal or abandonment‐in‐ place permit (residential) (vi) Impact Fee Deferral Administration: Each Lot, Single Family Dwelling, or Condominium Each Multi‐family Building $175 Fire plan review and inspection fees: $100,000.00 and above Construction Re‐inspection. Fee is per hour with a 2 hour minimum. The minimum may be assessed if the requested inspection does not meet the approval of the inspector. $0 to $249.99 $250.00 to $999.99 $1,000.00 to $4,999.99 $5,000.00 to $49,999.99 $50,000.00 to $99,999.99 Independent Fee Calculation Review (or unless otherwise established by School District or Renton Regional Fire Authority) SECTION XII. DEVELOPMENT FEES (CONTINUED) Impact Fees: (Continued) Medical/dental office, per sq foot Retail, per sq foot Leisure facilities, per sq foot Industrial/manufacturing, per sq foot Church, per sq foot Education, per sq foot student Special public facilities, per sq foot *(i)‐(ii) is per unit *(v)‐(xi) is per square foot 1 This fee shall be $0 for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). Restaurant/lounge, per sq foot (iv) $175 $175 5% 5% Other requested inspection when not required by the fire code, or when requested for after hours inspections. Fee is per hour with a minimum 1 2 hr hours when approved by the Fire Marshal, such as home daycares. RFA technology surcharge fee applied to Fire Department Fire Marshal Fees, subsection a. (i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi) and subsection b. (iii) NSF check fees 20% of plan review fee ‐ Min. $75 20% of plan review fee ‐ Min. $75 $250 $250 See Fire plan review and construction permit fees See Fire plan review and construction permit fees Underground tank removal permit (commercial) Hazardous production materials permit (for businesses storing, handling, or using hazardous production materials as regulated in the fire code) permit is yearly (v) (VIII) Non‐emergency Billable Services (ie: boat assists, etc) Rates published at: www.washingtonfirechiefs.com Third and subsequent re‐Inspection/Pre‐Citation Follow‐Up Inspection when re‐inspections are required beyond the first and second re‐inspections Construction permit: Operational fire code permit (issued in accordance with Section 105.6 of the IFC) fee is yearly (includes items such as fire special events, covered stages, mobile food facilities, hot works, etc.) Permits for Mobile food facilities that have passed a fire and life safety inspection in another jurisdiction that has reciprocity with Renton RFA Hazardous materials and HPM facilities yearly Late Payment Penalty Violation/Second Re‐Inspection after 30‐day period (whenever 30 days or more have passed since Fire Department notification of a violation, which required a first re‐inspection, and such violation has not been remedied or granted an extension) Preventable Fire alarm fee: First, second, and third preventable alarms Fourth and fifth preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. Sixth preventable alarm and successive preventable alarms in a calendar year, fee is per each alarm. Fire Permit type: (i) (ii) City of Renton Fee Schedule 2023‐2024 2023 2024 3. a.RMC 2‐9‐8.C $73 $73 i. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.1 $73 $73 ii. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.2 $73 $73 iii. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.3 $73 $73 iv. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.4 $73 $73 v. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.5 $73 $73 vi. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.6 $73 $73 vii. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.7 $73 $73 viii. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.8 $73 $73 ix. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.9 $73 $73 x. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.10 $73 $73 xi. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.11 $73 $73 xii. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.12 $73 $73 xiii. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.13 $73 $73 xiv. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.14 $73 $73 xv. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.15 $73 $73 xvi. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.16 $73 $73 xvii. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.17 $73 $73 xviii. RMC 2‐9‐8.C.17 $73 $73 b.RMC 4‐5‐070.C.102 $49 $49 c.RMC 5‐4‐1 $49 $49 d.RMC 6‐14‐22 $50 $50 i. RMC 6‐14‐3 $50 $50 ii. RMC 6‐14‐4 $50 $50 iii. RMC 6‐14‐5 $50 $50 iv. RMC 6‐14‐6 $50 $50 v. RMC 6‐14‐7 $50 $50 vi. RMC 6‐14‐8 $50 $50 vii. RMC 6‐14‐10 $50 $50 viii. RMC 6‐14‐11 $50 $50 ix. RMC 6‐14‐12 $50 $50 x. RMC 6‐14‐13 $50 $50 xi. RMC 6‐14‐14 $50 $50 xii. RMC 6‐14‐15 $50 $50 xiii. RMC 6‐14‐16 $50 $50 xiv. RMC 6‐14‐17 $50 $50 xv. RMC 6‐14‐18 $50 $50 xvi. RMC 6‐14‐19 $50 $50 xvii. RMC 6‐14‐20 $50 $50 e.RMC 6‐6‐1.A $49 $49 f.RMC 6‐6‐5.A $49 $49 g.RMC 9‐17‐10 $100 $100 h.RMC 9‐3‐5 $42 $42 i.RMC 9‐3‐7 $42 $42 j.RMC 9‐3‐10 $122 $122 k.RMC 9‐3‐26 $42 $42 l.RMC 9‐3‐31 $42 $42 m.RMC 10‐12‐25 $67 $67 n.RMC 10‐12‐26 $42 $42 o.RMC 10‐12‐27 $42 $42 p.RMC 10‐12‐28.C $42 $42 q.RMC 10‐12‐28.D $42 $42 r.RMC 10‐12‐28.E.1 $42 $42 s.RMC 10‐12‐28.E.2 $42 $42 t.RMC 10‐12‐28.F $42 $42 u.RMC 10‐12‐28.G $42 $42 v.RMC 10‐12‐28.H $42 $42 w.RMC 10‐2‐5 $47 $47 $48 $48 Owner to Maintain Premises Free of Litter Litter of Vacant Lots Unsafe Use of Scooter Operating Scooter When Prohibited Use of Scooter Where Prohibited Use of Scooter Without a Helmet No Reflectors on Scooter No Muffler on Scooter Scooter Operator Under Age 13 Prohibiting Distribution of Handbills Where Properly Posted Distributing Handbills at Inhabited Private Premises Dropping Litter from Aircraft Posting Notices Prohibited Litter on Occupied Private Property Truck Loads Causing Litter Litter in Lakes and Fountains Throwing/Distributing Commercial Handbills in Public Places Placing Handbills on Vehicles Depositing Handbills on Uninhabited/Vacant Premises Smoking in Park Litter in Public Spaces Placement of Litter in Receptacles Sweeping Litter in Gutters Merchants’ Duty Glass Container in Park with Swimming Area Group Rally/Special Use Permit Parking & Mooring Violation City Events Violation Alcohol in Park Vehicle/Boat Repair in Park Racing in Park SCUBA Diving in Park Camping/Overnight Stay in Parks Metal Detecting All other violations identified by Renton Municipal Code as an infraction not listed or otherwise specified by court rule or law. Animal Control – No License Littering Animal Control – Animal at Large Animal Control – Animal/Fowl Habitual Noise Violation of ATV Ordinance Inattentive Driving Truck Route Violation Avoiding Intersection Encroachment on Public Property Negligent Operation of Watercraft Speed Regulations of Watercraft Obstructions of Waterways Equipment Numbering Violation Violation of Rules of the Road Litter Thrown By Persons in Vehicles Violation of Park Rules (Civil Infraction) Possession/Sale/Discharge of Fireworks SECTION XIV. MONETARY PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR INFRACTIONS ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 7.80 Effect of Schedule. This schedule establishes default base penalties for violations of the Renton Municipal Code that are issued as infractions under the authority of RCW 7.80 RCW, but these penalties do not include any state‐imposed statutory assessments. Except as otherwise prohibited by law or court rule, a court with jurisdiction over the infraction may impose on a defendant a lesser penalty in an individual case. Provided that, whenever the base penalty plus mandatory statutory assessments results in a total payment that is not an even dollar amount, the base penalty is deemed to be amended to a higher amount which produces the next greatest even dollar total Penalties Established by Court Rule or Specific Penalty Established by Law. This schedule does not apply to penalties established by state or local court rule or to a penalty that is established in law with a specific amount (i.e. ordinance or statute setting a penalty equal to a specified amount rather than a penalty up to a maximum amount). To the extent a penalty scheduled herein conflicts with a state or local court rule or a penalty that is established in law, this schedule shall be deemed preempted by the court rule or penalty established in law Penalties: The following violations shall carry the following listed default base penalty, not including statutory assessments: 1. 2. Fire/Barbeque in Park Activities Prohibited in a Park Disregard Park Trail Sign Unauthorized Vehicle in a Park Operating Motorized Vehicle on Park Trail Dismount Zone Violation Speeding on Trails RESOLUTION NO. 4513 EXHIBIT B 2023 Capital Facilities Plan of Issaquah School District No. 411 Page 1 of 24 Issaquah School District No. 411 Issaquah, Washington Adopted: June 22, 2023 Resolution No: 1203 The Issaquah School District No. 411 hereby provides this Capital Facilities Plan documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District. The plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and King County Council Ordinance 21-A. 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Page 2 of 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 3 STANDARD OF SERVICE ............................................................................................................... 4 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................................... 5 DEVELOPMENT TRACKING AND STUDENT GENERATION RATES .......................................... 5 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS ................................. 6 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued) .............. 7 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 8 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ................................ 9 TABLE 2: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY ...................................... 10 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES ..................................................... 11 SITE LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................................... 12 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP ........................................................................................... 13 ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN ..................................... 14 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ............................ 15 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS ....................................... 16 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ............................................ 17 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ..................................................................................... 18 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS ...................................... 19 APPENDIX A: 2022-23 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES .................................................. 20 APPENDIX B: 2022-23 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES ............................................................ 21 APPENDIX C: 2022-23 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES ................................................................ 22 APPENDIX D: 2022-23 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES .............................................................. 23 APPENDIX E: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN ....................................................................................... 24 Page 3 of 24 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Issaquah School District (the “District”) as the District's primary facility planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and King County Council Code Title 21A. This Plan was prepared using data available in April 2023. This Plan is an update of prior long-term Capital Facilities Plans adopted by the Issaquah School District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole Plan for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with board policies, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six- Year Capital Facilities Plan. In June 1992, the District first submitted a request to King County to impose and to collect school impact fees on new developments in unincorporated King County. On November 16, 1992, the King County Council first adopted the District's Plan and a fee implementing ordinance. This Plan is the annual update of the Six-Year Plan. King County and the cities of Issaquah, Renton, Bellevue, Newcastle and Sammamish collect impact fees on behalf of the District. Most of these jurisdictions provide exemptions from impact fees for senior housing and certain low-income housing. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any charges in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. Page 4 of 24 STANDARD OF SERVICE School facility and student capacity needs are dictated by the types and amounts of space required to accommodate the District’s adopted educational program. The educational program standards which typically drive facility space needs include grade configuration, optimal facility size, class size, educational program offerings, as well as classroom utilization and scheduling requirements and use of re-locatable classroom facilities (portables). Different class sizes are used depending on the grade level or programs offered such as special education or the gifted program. With the passage of Initiative 728 in November 2000, the Issaquah School Board established new class size standards for elementary grades K-5. The Board and District Administration will continue to keep class sizes near the levels provided by I-728; this will be done via local levy funds. There is also legislation that requires the State to fund Full-Day Kindergarten by 2018. The District provided Full-Day Kindergarten beginning in the 2016-2017 school year. A class size average of 20 for grades K-5 is now being used to calculate building capacities. A class size of 26 is used for grades 6-8 and 28 for grades 9-12. Special Education class size is based on 12 students per class. For the purpose of this analysis, rooms designated for special use, consistent with the provisions of King County Council Code Title 21A, are not considered classrooms. Invariably, some classrooms will have student loads greater in number than this average level of service and some will be smaller. Program demands, state and federal requirements, collective bargaining agreements, and available funding may also affect this level of service in the years to come. Due to these variables, a utilization factor of 95% is used to adjust design capacities to what a building may actually accommodate. Portables used as classrooms are used to accommodate enrollment increases for interim purposes until permanent classrooms are available. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either moved to another school as an interim classroom or removed. The King County decision to no longer allow schools to be built outside the Urban Growth Boundary Line (UGBL) means District owned property planned for a new elementary school and middle school could not be used for its long planned purpose. The District sold this planned site to a third party. The District has acquired one high school site, two elementary school sites and one middle school site inside the UGBL. The State does not provide funding for property purchases. The District’s voters approved the 2016 Bond to provide funding or a new high school, new middle school, two new elementary schools, a rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. All of those projects are now complete with the exception of the new high school and one new elementary school, which are both discussed further in this Capital Facilities Plan and will require additional funding sources. The District’s voters recently passed a capital levy that will add, in part, funding for the high school. Additional funding for the elementary school is anticipated to be pursued during the six-year planning period. Page 5 of 24 TRIGGER OF CONSTRUCTION The Issaquah School District Capital Facilities Plan proposes construction of a new high school and a new elementary school to meet capacity at the elementary and high school related to recent and ongoing enrollment growth needs. The District recently completed construction of a new elementary school, Cedar Trails Elementary School, a new middle school, Cougar Mountain Middle School, as well as additions at several elementary schools to help address recent growth needs. The need for new schools and school additions is triggered by comparing our enrollment forecasts with our permanent capacity figures. These forecasts are by grade level and, to the extent possible, by geography. The analysis provides a list of new construction needed by school year. The decision on when to construct a new facility involves factors other than verified need. Funding is the most serious consideration. Factors including the potential tax rate for our citizens, the availability of state funds and impact fees, the ability to acquire land, and the ability to pass bond issues determine when any new facility can be constructed. New school facilities are a response, in part, to new housing which the county or cities have approved for construction. The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. DEVELOPMENT TRACKING AND STUDENT GENERATION RATES In order to increase the accuracy and validity of enrollment projections, a major emphasis has been placed on the collection and tracking data of known new housing developments. This data provides two useful pieces of planning information. First, it is used to determine the actual number of students that are generated from a single family or multi-family residence. It also provides important information on the impact new housing developments will have on existing facilities and/or the need for additional facilities. Developments that have been completed or are still selling houses are used to forecast the number of students who will attend our schools from future developments. The District used a third-party consultant to review recent development data and provide updated student generation rates for elementary school, middle school and high school student per new single-family residence and new multi-family housing. Updated rates are shown in Table 2. Page 6 of 24 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS The District relies on school impact fee revenue to help fund growth-related capacity needs. However, by law, impact fees can only be used to fund a portion of a capacity project. State funding and impact fees are also not reliable sources of revenue. As a result, the District must also rely on local funding to fund school construction. The District has two growth-related capacity projects included in this Capital Facilities Plan: a new high school and a new elementary school. The voters funded the projects as a part of the April 2016 bond and (for the high school) the April 2022 capital levy. The District utilized funds from the 2016 Bond to purchase property for the two schools and to engage in design and permitting work. Additional funding, aside from impact fee revenue and State School Construction Assistance Program dollars, is needed to construct the two schools. As demonstrated in Appendix A the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 8,763 students at the elementary level. This leaves the District’s elementary enrollment under permanent capacity by 454 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix B the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,946 students at the middle school level. This leaves the District’s middle school enrollment under permanent capacity by 321 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). As demonstrated in Appendix C the District currently has a permanent capacity (at 95%) to serve 4,921 students at the high school level. This leaves the District’s high school enrollment over permanent capacity by 694 students (current enrollment is identified on page 9). Based on the District’s student generation rates (Table 2), the District expects that 0.589 students will be generated from each new single family home and 0.147 students will be generated from each new multi-family dwelling unit. Applying the enrollment projections contained on page 9 to the District’s existing permanent capacity (Appendices A, B, and C) and if no capacity improvements are made by the year 2028-29, and permanent capacity is adjusted to 95%, the District elementary population will be over its permanent capacity by 329 students, under permanent capacity at the middle school level by 284 students, and over permanent capacity by 776 students at the high school level. Importantly, the above figures incorporate recently completed growth-projects at the elementary and middle school levels. The District’s enrollment projections are developed using two methods: first, the cohort survival – historical enrollment method is used to forecast enrollment growth based upon the progression of existing students in the District; then, the enrollment projections are modified to include students anticipated from new developments in the District. Page 7 of 24 NEED FOR IMPACT FEES AND GROWTH-RELATED CAPACITY NEEDS (continued) To address existing and future capacity needs, the District’s six-year construction plan includes the following capacity projects: Facility Expansions Projected / Final Completion Date Location Additional Capacity New High School #4 New Elementary #17 August 2027 August 2028 Issaquah Issaquah 1600 560 The District recently opened the new Cougar Mountain Middle School, with permanent capacity of 787, and the new Cedar Trails Elementary School, with permanent capacity of 471 students. Both schools were funded by the April 2016 bond and provide capacity to serve new growth. Based upon the District’s capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data, the District has determined that the planned new high school and new elementary school are needed, in part, to provide capacity improvements necessary to serve students generated by recent and ongoing new residential development. The school impact fee formula ensures that new development only pays for the cost of the facilities necessitated by new development. The fee calculations examine the costs of housing the students generated by each new single family dwelling unit or each new multi-family dwelling unit and then reduces that amount by credits for the anticipated state match and future tax payments. The resulting impact fee is then discounted as required by local ordinances. Thus, by applying the student generation factor to the school project costs, the fee formula only calculates the costs of providing capacity to serve each new dwelling unit. The formula does not require new development to contribute the costs of providing capacity to address existing needs. The King County Council and the City Councils of the cities of Bellevue, Issaquah, Newcastle, Renton and Sammamish have created a framework for collecting school impact fees and the District can demonstrate that new developments will have an impact on the District. The impact fees will be used in a manner consistent with RCW 82.02.050-110 and the adopted local ordinances. Engrossed Senate Bill 5923, enacted in the 2015 Legislative Session, requires that developers be provided an option to defer payment of impact fees to final inspection, certificate of occupancy, or closing, with no fees deferred longer than 18 months from building permit issuance. The District adopts the positions that: (1) no school impact fee should be collected later than the earlier of final inspection or 18 months from the time of building permit issuance; and (2) no developer applicant should be permitted to defer payment of school impact fees for more than 20 dwelling units in a single year. The District’s recent and ongoing student growth, coupled with the need for the timely funding and construction of new facilities to serve this growth, requires strict adherence to this position. Page 8 of 24 ENROLLMENT METHODOLOGY Two basic techniques are used, with the results compared, to establish the most likely range of anticipated student enrollment: 1. The student 3-2-1 cohort survival method. Examine Issaquah School District enrollments for the last 5 years and determine the average cohort survival for the consecutive five-year period. Because cohort survival does not consider students generated from new development it is a conservative projection of actual enrollment. For the same reason, these projections are also slow to react to actual growth. The cohort method is also hampered by the fact that it does account for anomalies affecting enrollment (for example, the Covid-19 pandemic, temporary remote learning and the variations in the transition back to in-person learning). 2. Based on information from King County, realtors, developers, etc., the District seeks to establish the number of new dwelling units that will be sold each year and converts those units to new students based on the following: a) The number of actual new students as a percentage of actual new dwellings for the past several years. (The student generation factors are shown in Table 2) b) Determine the actual distribution of new students by grade level for the past several years, i.e., 5% to kindergarten, 10% to first grade, 2% to 11th grade, etc. c) Based on an examination of the history shown by (a) and (b) above, establish the most likely factor to apply to the projected new dwellings. After determining the expected new students, the current actual student enrollments are moved forward from year to year with the arrived at additions. One of the challenges associated with all projection techniques is that, where new development is in the pipeline, they tend to always show growth because the number of houses and the general population always increases. Enrollments, however, can and do decrease even as the population increases. The reason is as the population matures, the number of kindergartners will go down as the number of 10th graders is still increasing. To adjust for this factor, the number of school age children per dwelling is examined. When this number exceeds expectations, it is probably because the District is still assuming kindergarten growth, while the main growth is actually moving into middle school. When this happens, a reduction factor is added to kindergarten to force it to decrease even though the general population continues to grow. A precise statistical formula has not been developed to make this adjustment. After all of the projections have been made and examined, the most likely range is selected. An examination of past projections compared with actual enrollment indicates the cohorts tend to be more accurate over a ten-year time span while dwelling units tend to be more accurate over a shorter period. The probable reason is that over a ten-year period, the projections tend to average out even though there are major shifts both up and down within the period. The Covid-19 pandemic has complicated projections in recent years. The District has experienced a return to in-person learning in the last two years but continues to monitor student enrollment closely. As with last year’s projections, this year’s projections are more conservative than in previous years to allow the District to gather additional data and experience. Like other districts, the District is also experiencing fewer students at the high school level enrolling in Running Start options and instead choosing to be fully enrolled in the District 9-12 program. Enrollment projections for the years 2023-2024 through 2036-2037 are shown in Table 1 (page 9). These projections are conservative in the near-term (within a 5 year period). The District assumes that a post- pandemic increase in enrollment will occur, but does not believe our historical peak enrollment will be reached within the next 7 years. The District however, could have a large uptick in enrollment depending upon land use decisions, housing and labor market, etc. The District will monitor these matters and include updated information in future updates to the Capital Facilities Plan. Page 9 of 24 TABLE 1: ACTUAL STUDENT COUNTS & ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Page 10 of 24 TABLE 2: STUDENT FACTORS – SINGLE FAMILY & MULTI-FAMILY Page 11 of 24 INVENTORY AND EVALUATION OF CURRENT FACILITIES Currently, using the 95% utilization factor, the District has the capacity to house 18,630 students in permanent facilities and 4,290 students in portables. While portables are critical for interim capacity needs, they are not desirable nor long-term capacity solutions. The District looks to its permanent capacity, as adjusted for utilization, for purposes of determining growth-related needs and addressing school capacity. The projected student enrollment for the 2023-2024 school year is expected to be 18,549 which leaves a permanent capacity overage of 80. Enrollment projections indicate permanent capacity needs at the elementary and high school levels over the six-year planning period. Calculations of elementary, middle school and high school capacities are shown in Appendices A, B and C. Totals are shown in Appendix D. Below is a list of current facilities. These facility locations and sites are shown on the District Site Location Map. EXISTING FACILITIES LOCATION GRADE SPAN K-5: Apollo Elementary 15025 S.E. 117th Street, Renton Briarwood Elementary 17020 S.E. 134th Street, Renton Cascade Ridge Elementary 2020 Trossachs Blvd. S.E., Sammamish Cedar Trails Elementary 4399 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd S.E. , Sammamish Challenger Elementary 25200 S.E. Klahanie Blvd., Issaquah Clark Elementary 335 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah Cougar Ridge Elementary 4630 167th Ave. S.E., Bellevue Creekside Elementary 20777 SE 16th Street, Sammamish Discovery Elementary 2300 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Endeavour Elementary 26205 S.E. Issaquah-Fall City Rd., Issaquah Grand Ridge Elementary 1739 NE Park Drive, Issaquah Issaquah Valley Elementary 555 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah Maple Hills Elementary 15644 204th Ave. S.E., Issaquah Newcastle Elementary 8440 136th Ave S.E., Newcastle Sunny Hills Elementary 3200 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd. S.E., Sammamish Sunset Elementary 4229 W. Lk. Sammamish Pkwy. S.E., Issaquah GRADE SPAN 6-8: Beaver Lake Middle School 25025 S.E. 32nd Street, Issaquah Cougar Mountain Middle School 1929 NW Talus Dr, Issaquah Issaquah Middle School 600 2nd Ave. Ave. S.E., Issaquah Maywood Middle School 14490 168th Ave. S.E., Renton Pacific Cascade Middle School 24635 SE Issaquah-Fall City Rd, Issaquah Pine Lake Middle School 3095 Issaquah-Pine Lake Rd., Sammamish GRADE SPAN 9-12: Issaquah High School 700 Second Ave. S.E., Issaquah Liberty High School 16655 S.E. 136th Street, Renton Skyline High School 1122 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Gibson Ek High School 379 First Ave. S.E., Issaquah SUPPORT SERVICES: Administration Building 5150 220th Ave S.E., Issaquah Holly Street Early Learning Center 565 N.W. Holly Street, Issaquah May Valley Service Center 16404 S.E. May Valley Road, Renton Transportation Center 805 Second Avenue S.E., Issaquah Transportation Satellite 3402 228th Ave. S.E., Sammamish Page 12 of 24 SITE LOCATION MAP Page 13 of 24 URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY MAP Page 14 of 24 THE ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SIX-YEAR CONSTRUCTION PLAN The District's Six-Year Finance Plan is shown in Appendix E. Shown in Table 3 is the District's projected capacity to house students, which reflects the additional facilities as noted. Voters passed a $533 million bond in April 2016 to fund the purchase of land for and construction of a new high school, a new middle school, two new elementary schools, the rebuild/expansion of an existing middle school and additions to six existing elementary schools. The voters also funded an April 2022 capital levy to provide additional funding for the high school project as well as other projects. The District does anticipate receiving State matching funds for High School #4 project that would reduce future bond sale amounts or be applied to new K-12 construction projects included in this Plan. The District will need additional funding to construct the new high school and new elementary school. The District anticipates seeking additional funding within six years. Secured funding will be identified in future updates to this CFP. The District also anticipates that it will receive $500,000 in impact fees and mitigation payments that will be applied to capital projects. The District projects 18,549 FTE students for the 2023-2024 school year and 19,451 FTE students in the 2028-2029 school year. Growth will be accommodated by the planned facilities. Per the formula in the adopted school impact fee ordinance, half of the unfunded growth-related need is assigned to impact fees and half is the local share. Page 15 of 24 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS Page 16 of 24 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS Page 17 of 24 PROJECTED CAPACITY TO HOUSE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Page 18 of 24 SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Page 19 of 24 BASIS FOR DATA USED IN SCHOOL IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION COST: x The District previously purchased sites for the new elementary school and high school. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST: x Elementary $52,500,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional elementary capacity x High School $187,500,000 is the estimated construction cost of the project providing additional high school capacity PERCENTAGE OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SQUARE FOOTAGE TO TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: Total Square Footage 2,935,397 Permanent Square Footage (OSPI) 2,744,580 Temporary Square Footage 190,817 STATE MATCH CREDIT: Current Area Cost Allowance $246.83 Percentage of State Match 36.09% Page 20 of 24 APPENDIX A: 2022-23 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITIES Page 21 of 24 APPENDIX B: 2022-23 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITIES Page 22 of 24 APPENDIX C: 2022-23 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Page 23 of 24 APPENDIX D: 2022-23 TOTAL SCHOOL CAPACITIES Page 24 of 24 APPENDIX E: 6-YEAR FINANCE PLAN RESOLUTION NO. ________ EXHIBIT C Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2022-2023 – 2028-2029 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2022-2023 through 2028-2029 June 2023 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7526 BOARD of DIRECTORS Mr. Joe Bento, President Ms. Meghan Margel, Vice Director Ms. Leslie Hamada, Legislative Representative Mr. Awale Farah, Director Mr. Tim Clark, Director ADMINISTRATION Israel Vela Superintendent of Schools Dr. Wade Barringer, Associate Superintendent Strategic Initiatives & Operations Dave Bussard, Executive Director Operations & Facilities Sara Dumlao, Assistant Director of Business Services Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ......................................................................... 3 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" ............................................ 7 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ............................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students .................................... 8 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ........................................................ 9 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan .......................................................... 1ϰ VI - Portable Classrooms ....................................................................................... 19 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ........................................................... 20 VIII - Finance Plan ................................................................................................. 26 IX – Summary of Changes to June 202Ϯ Capital Facilities Plan .............................. 3ϰ X Appendices ..................................................................................................... 3ϱ I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2023 for the 2023-2024 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects͘ This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all the district's needs. The district may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, considering a longer or shorter period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the district as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn, and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to the cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Functional capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the interim capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. 1 The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional interim capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of interim facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the interim use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond, as well as the 2018 Capital Levy. Additional information about these projects can be found on the District’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). Based on revised student generation rates, our capacity and enrollment projections, the District will stay current with non-collection of student impact fee rate for the coming year. For a short overview, see Section IX (Summary of Changes to the June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan). 2 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). For this Plan, the district relied substantially on the results from Dr. Les Kendrick’s study of long-range enrollment forecasts for the Kent School District in the Winter of 2022. King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 2). 7.49% of 24,337 King County live births in 2018 is projected for 1,824 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2023. This is a decrease of 937 live births in King County over the previous year. Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. In addition to live birth data, enrollment projections for October 1, 2023 going forward rely upon the results of the enrollment study by Dr. Kendrick, utilizing the “medium growth” methodology. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. 3 STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .248 Middle School .085 Senior High .107 Total .440 Multi-Family Elementary .130 Middle School .049 Senior High .056 Total .235 The student generation factor is based on 1,728 new SFD (Single Family Detached) units built between 2017 and 2021. The student generation factor is based on 1,526 new MF (Multi- Family) units built during the same period. The multi-family units consisted of 1,222 apartment units and 340 townhome units. The District sees an average of 44 students for every 100 single family units that are built and an average of 24 students for every 100 multi-family units that are built. The rate for apartment units is higher than for townhome units. The District sees an average of 29 students for every 100 apartment units. The student generation rate also varies among apartment developments, based on the number of bedrooms in the unit. Units with three plus bedrooms have much higher student generation rates than units that have two or fewer bedrooms. Noting these differences can help the District when planning for future growth from housing. In preparing the 2022-2023 to 2028-2029 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Educational Data Solutions, LLC led by Dr. Les Kendricks, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. Within the district’s borders there are several income-based and multi-family housing projects coming on-line in 2022/2023. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. One multi-family project worth noting, Covington Commons which appears to have many units with three-plus bedrooms and is likely to show better student growth than the medium project once completed. 4 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live Births LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 October HC Enrollment 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 King County Live Births 1 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 25,487 26,011 25,274 Incr/(Decr) 323 (165) (543)116 402 (122)438 139 524 (737) Kindergarten / Birth % 1 8.40% 8.34% 8.34% 8.17% 8.14% 7.98% 7.93% 6.68% 7.06% 7.42% Kindergarten 2,119 2,090 2,045 2,013 2,037 1,989 2,010 1,703 1,837 1,875 Grade 1 2,186 2,127 2,131 2,067 2,056 2,061 2,036 1,882 1,768 1,945 Grade 2 2,055 2,190 2,163 2,163 2,077 2,008 2,091 1,980 1,817 1,840 Grade 3 1,922 2,070 2,176 2,195 2,143 2,043 1,995 2,001 1,938 1,887 Grade 4 2,087 1,956 2,089 2,195 2,218 2,118 2,038 1,912 1,924 1,953 Grade 5 2,008 2,116 1,958 2,103 2,189 2,169 2,120 1,937 1,872 1,953 Grade 6 2,079 2,023 2,058 1,952 2,120 2,184 2,164 2,024 1,894 1,962 Grade 7 Middle School 2,046 2,104 1,974 2,021 1,922 2,044 2,166 2,010 1,925 1,906 Grade 8 " " 2,121 2,091 2,100 2,021 2,043 1,882 2,073 2,086 1,937 1,956 Grade 9 Senior High 2,483 2,428 2,093 2,105 2,006 2,004 1,888 2,006 2,043 2,011 Grade 10 " " 2,046 2,151 2,165 2,099 2,080 1,946 2,035 1,813 1,959 2,050 Grade 11 " " 1,873 1,802 1,818 1,865 1,823 1,732 1,663 1,744 1,583 1,677 Grade 12 " " 1,539 1,576 1,742 1,730 1,810 1,654 1,634 1,484 1,656 1,467 Total Enrollment 2 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 24,582 24,153 24,482 Yearly Headcount Incr/(Decr)(48)160 (212)17 (5) (690)79 (1,331) (429)329 Cumulative Incr/(Decr)(267) (107) (319) (302) (307) (997) (918) (2,249) (2,678) (2,349) For 2023 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later. 2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students. Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 May 2023 5 KK ENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No . 415 SIX - YEAR ENROL L MENT PROJ ECTION Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 LB in 2020 LB in 2021 Est LB in 2022 Est. LB in 2023 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT October 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 King County Live Births 25,274 24,337 24,090 23,686 23,428 23,583 23,973 Incr/(Decr)(213)(937) (247) (404) (258)155 390 Kindergarten / Birth % 7.42% 7.49% 7.53% 7.60% 7.60% 7.75% 7.75% FD Kindergarten 1,875 1,824 1,814 1,801 1,781 1,827 1,858 Grade 1 1,945 1,937 1,893 1,902 1,888 1,849 1,897 Grade 2 1,840 1,967 1,960 1,945 1,954 1,930 1,890 Grade 3 1,887 1,871 2,003 2,016 2,000 2,009 1,985 Grade 4 1,953 1,874 1,861 2,012 2,025 2,009 2,018 Grade 5 1,953 1,964 1,887 1,893 2,047 2,060 2,044 Grade 6 1,962 1,995 2,008 1,949 1,955 2,114 2,128 Grade 7 Middle School 1,906 1,939 1,975 2,007 1,948 1,954 2,113 Grade 8 " "1,956 1,903 1,936 1,991 2,024 1,964 1,970 Grade 9 Senior High 2,011 1,993 1,941 1,995 2,051 2,085 2,024 Grade 10 " "2,050 2,009 1,991 1,959 2,013 2,070 2,104 Grade 11 " "1,677 1,798 1,763 1,765 1,736 1,784 1,834 Grade 12 " "1,467 1,585 1,691 1,675 1,677 1,649 1,695 Total Enrollment Projection 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 Yearly Incr/(Decr)(100)177 64 187 189 205 256 Yearly Incr/(Decr) % -0.41% 0.72% 0.26% 0.76% 0.76% 0.82% 1.01% Total Enrollment Projection*24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study Dec '22 ("Medium Growth Model") 2022 - 2028 Enrollment Projections PROJECTED ENROLLMENT Live births for King County are estimates for year 2022 & 2023 *Does not include iGrad, RS Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 May 2023 6 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06.1225 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the istrict which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students x Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. x Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided with music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: Multilingual Learner Education (MLE) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) – Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) – State Program 7 Highly Capable Students – State Program Reading, math orscience Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools and one middle school Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10-15 students, depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. x The average class size ratio for grades 7–8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. x The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Like Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the functional capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the Kent School District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 95% for secondary schools. Functional capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. 8 /sͲ/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJĂŶĚĂƉĂĐŝƚLJŽĨ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ^ĐŚŽŽůƐ ƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ͕ ƚŚĞ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ŚĂƐ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚ ĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂů ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ ƚŽ ŚŽƵƐĞ ϯϯ͕ϴϰϳ ƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ ĂŶĚ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŵ;ƉŽƌƚĂďůĞͿĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJƚŽŚŽƵƐĞϰ͕ϭϲϭ͘dŚŝƐĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJŝƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚΖƐ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŽĨ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞĂƐƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚŝŶ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ///͘/ŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐWůĂŶŝƐĂŶŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJŽĨƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚΖƐƐĐŚŽŽůƐ ďLJƚLJƉĞ͕ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĂŶĚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ;^ĞĞdĂďůĞϯͿ͘dŚĞƌĂƚŝŽďĞƚǁĞĞŶƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ ĂŶĚƉŽƌƚĂďůĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJŝƐϴϳ͘ϴйͲϭϮ͘Ϯй͘ dŚĞ ĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂů ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ ŝƐ ƉĞƌŝŽĚŝĐĂůůLJ ƵƉĚĂƚĞĚ ĨŽƌ ĐŚĂŶŐĞƐ ŝŶƚŚĞ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ĐůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵƐ͕ĂŶĚŶĞǁƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͘&ƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJŚĂƐďĞĞŶƵƉĚĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐWůĂŶƚŽƌĞĨůĞĐƚ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ&ĂůůŽĨϮϬϮϮ͘ ĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ͕DŝĚĚůĞ^ĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚ^ĞŶŝŽƌ,ŝŐŚ^ĐŚŽŽůĐĂƉĂĐŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚŝŶ ƉƉĞŶĚŝĐĞƐ͕͕ĂŶĚ͘DĂƉƐŽĨĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͘ &ŽƌĐůĂƌŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐŝƐĂďƌŝĞĨĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞŶŽŶͲƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ĨŽƌƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐŝŶ<ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͗ ŝ'ƌĂĚͲ<ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŚĂƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŚĞ/ŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůŝnjĞĚ'ƌĂĚƵĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞŐƌĞĞWƌŽŐƌĂŵ Žƌ͞ŝ'ƌĂĚ͘͟ŝ'ƌĂĚŝƐĂŶKƉĞŶŽŽƌ;ƌŽƉͲŽƵƚZĞĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚͿ^ĐŚŽŽůƚŚĂƚŽĨĨĞƌƐĂƐĞĐŽŶĚƉůƵƐ ĐŚĂŶĐĞƚŽƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐĂŐĞĚϭϲͲϮϭǁŚŽŚĂǀĞĚƌŽƉƉĞĚŽƵƚŽĨŚŝŐŚƐĐŚŽŽůŽƌĂƌĞĂƚƌŝƐŬŽĨŶŽƚ ĞĂƌŶŝŶŐĂŚŝŐŚƐĐŚŽŽůĚŝƉůŽŵĂďLJĂŐĞϮϭ͘ŝ'ƌĂĚŝƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶ͕ ďĞĐĂƵƐĞŝƚŝƐƐĞƌǀĞĚĂƐĂůĞĂƐĞĚƐƉĂĐĞĂƚƚŚĞ<ĞŶƚ,ŝůůWůĂnjĂ^ŚŽƉƉŝŶŐĞŶƚĞƌ͘KǀĞƌƚŚĞƉĂƐƚ ƚŚƌĞĞLJĞĂƌƐ͕ĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞŝ'ƌĂĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŚĂƐĂǀĞƌĂŐĞĚŽǀĞƌϮϱϬƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ͘ <ĞŶƚsŝƌƚƵĂůĐĂĚĞŵLJͲdŚĞ<ĞŶƚsŝƌƚƵĂůĐĂĚĞŵLJŝƐŽƉĞŶƚŽŐƌĂĚĞƐϲͲϭϮĂŶĚŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ ƐĞƌǀŝŶŐϭϳϭƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞǀŝƌƚƵĂůƐĐŚŽŽůŽĨĨĞƌƐĂĨůĞdžŝďůĞůĞĂƌŶŝŶŐĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽ ĞŶŐĂŐĞƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐǁŚĞŶĂŶĚǁŚĞƌĞƚŚĞLJǁŽƌŬďĞƐƚ͘ ĂĐŚƐĐŚŽŽůĚĂLJǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂĐŽŵďŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨůŝǀĞ;ƐLJŶĐŚƌŽŶŽƵƐͿǀŝƌƚƵĂůŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŽŶͲĚĞŵĂŶĚ;ĂƐLJŶĐŚƌŽŶŽƵƐͿůĞĂƌŶŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞ ŽĨ Ă ƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ďĞůů ƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞ͘ ^ƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ ĐĂŶ ĂƚƚĞŶĚ ůŝǀĞǀŝƌƚƵĂů ůĞƐƐŽŶƐ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞŝƌ ƚĞĂĐŚĞƌƐĂŶĚĐůĂƐƐŵĂƚĞƐ͕ƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶůŝǀĞǀŝƌƚƵĂůĐůĂƐƐŽƌƐŵĂůůŐƌŽƵƉĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶƐ͕ĐŚĞĐŬͲŝŶŽƌ ŵĞĞƚ ǁŝƚŚ ƚĞĂĐŚĞƌƐ͕ ǁĂƚĐŚ ƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚ ǀŝĚĞŽ ůĞƐƐŽŶƐ͕ ǁŽƌŬ ŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚůLJ ŽŶ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ĂŶĚ ůĞƐƐŽŶƐ͕ƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶůĞĂƌŶŝŶŐĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƐŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƐĐŚŽŽůƐĞƚƚŝŶŐĨŽƌĐƌĞĚŝƚŽƌƚŽŵĞĞƚ ĐŽŵƉĞƚĞŶĐŝĞƐ͘sŝƌƚƵĂůƐĐŚŽŽůƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐŵĂLJĂůƐŽĂƚƚĞŶĚƚŚĞŝƌďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJƐĐŚŽŽůĨŽƌƐĞůĞĐƚĐůĂƐƐĞƐ ĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘ 9 2022 - 2023 Year Opened Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 550 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 576 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 620 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 504 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 626 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 602 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 490 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 446 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 602 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 564 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 578 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 596 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 550 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 658 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 580 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 522 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 608 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 580 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 522 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 546 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 642 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 648 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 578 River Ridge Elementary 2021 RR 00000 - 22420 Military Rd S SeaTac, WA 858 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 554 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 600 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 508 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 564 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 578 Elementary TOTAL 16,850 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 1,112 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 922 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 1,154 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 884 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 1,058 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 1,090 Canyon Ridge Middle School 1966 CR 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 0 Middle School TOTAL 6,220 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 2,211 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 2,516 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,940 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 2,608 Senior High TOTAL 10,275 Kent Laboratory Academy 2021 KA 00000 - 208th St Kent, WA 98030 502 Kent Virtual Academy KVA No hard Building i-Grad Program IG Not a KSD Building DISTRICT TOTAL 33,847 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 Functional CapacitySCHOOL ABR ADDRESS 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 10 Kent‐Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA Kent School District 2022/23 School Year High School Boundaries Legend High School Buildings Kent-Meridian High School Kentlake High School Kentridge High School Kentwood High School m 0482 Miles 11 Kent School District 2022/23 School Year Middle School Boundaries Cedar Heights Middle School Mattson Middle School Meeker Middle School Meridian Middle School Mill Creek Middle School Northwood Middle School King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA 0482 Miles Legend Cedar Heights Middle School Mattson Middle School Meeker Middle School Meridian Middle School Mill Creek Middle School Northwood Middle School Middle Schools m 12 Kent School District 2022/23 School Year Elementary School Boundaries Carriage Crest Elementary Cedar Valley ElementaryCovington Elementary Crestwood Elementary East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary Daniel Elementary Glenridge Elementary Grass Lake Elementary Horizon Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kent Elementary Lake Youngs Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Meadow Ridge Elementary Meridian Elementary Millennium Elementary Neely O Brien Elementary Panther Lake Elementary Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary River Ridge Elementary King County, WA State Parks GIS, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA 0482 Miles Legend Carriage Crest Elementary Cedar Valley Elementary Covington Elementary Crestwood Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Fairwood Elementary Glenridge Elementary Grass Lake Elementary Horizon Elementary Jenkins Creek Elementary Kent Elementary Lake Youngs Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Meadow Ridge Elementary Meridian Elementary Millennium Elementary Neely O Brien Elementary Panther Lake Elementary Park Orchard Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Ridgewood Elementary River Ridge Elementary Sawyer Woods Elementary Scenic Hill Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Springbrook Elementary Sunrise Elementary Elementary Schools m 13 sͲ^ŝdžͲzĞĂƌWůĂŶŶŝŶŐĂŶĚŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ /ŶEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϬϭϲ͕ƚŚĞǀŽƚĞƌƐŽĨƚŚĞ<ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĂďŽŶĚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞĨŽƌ ΨϮϱϮŵŝůůŝŽŶ͘dŚŝƐďŽŶĚŝŶŐĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨŽǀŝŶŐƚŽŶ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ƐĐŚŽŽů͕ǁŚŝĐŚŽƉĞŶĞĚŝŶƵŐƵƐƚŽĨϮϬϭϴ͕ƚŚĞŶĞǁZŝǀĞƌZŝĚŐĞ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJƐĐŚŽŽů͕ĂŶĚŽƵƌŶĞǁ <ĞŶƚ>ĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJĐĂĚĞŵLJ͕ǁŚŝĐŚďŽƚŚŽƉĞŶĞĚŝŶƵŐƵƐƚϮϬϮϭ͘ ƐĂĐƌŝƚŝĐĂůĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚŽĨĐĂƉŝƚĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ĐŽƵŶƚLJĂŶĚĐŝƚLJƉůĂŶŶĞƌƐĂŶĚĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲ ŵĂŬĞƌƐĂƌĞĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĚƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌƐĂĨĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌĂůůƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐǁŚĞŶƌĞǀŝĞǁŝŶŐ ĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌŶĞǁƌŽĂĚƐĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚŝƐƐŚŽƵůĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ ĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŽĂŶĚĨƌŽŵƐĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚďƵƐƐƚŽƉƐĂƐǁĞůůĂƐďƵƐƉƵůůͲŽƵƚƐĂŶĚƚƵƌŶͲ ĂƌŽƵŶĚƐ͘ /ŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐWůĂŶŝƐĂŶŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJŽĨƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚƐŝƚĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚǁŚŝĐŚ ĂƌĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůLJĂĐĐĞƉƚĂďůĞƐŝƚĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐŝŶƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ;^ĞĞdĂďůĞϰΘ^ŝƚĞŵĂƉͿ͘ sŽƚĞƌĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďŽŶĚŝƐƐƵĞƐŚĂǀĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞŽĨƐŝƚĞƐĨŽƌƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƐĞ ĂŶĚĨƵƚƵƌĞƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐŝƚĞƐĂĐƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽĚĂƚĞĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐWůĂŶ͘^ŽŵĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŝƐ ƐĞĐƵƌĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐŝƚĞƐ͕ďƵƚƐŽŵĞŵĂLJďĞĨƵŶĚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐĂƐ ŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘EŽƚĂůůƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐŵĞĞƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐĐŚŽŽůĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚ ƐŽŵĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŵĂLJďĞƚƌĂĚĞĚŽƌƐŽůĚƚŽŵĞĞƚĨƵƚƵƌĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐ͘ dŚĞŽĂƌĚǁŝůůĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĂŶĂŶŶƵĂůƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂŶĚƚŚŽƐĞĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶƐǁŝůůďĞ ƌĞĨůĞĐƚĞĚŝŶĞĂĐŚƵƉĚĂƚĞŽĨƚŚĞĂƉŝƚĂů&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶ͘ KƵƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚǁĞŶƚŽƵƚĨŽƌĂŽŶĚDĞĂƐƵƌĞŝŶƉƌŝůŽĨϮϬϮϯĂŶĚĚŝĚŶŽƚƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĞŶŽƵŐŚǀŽƚĞƐ ĨŽƌĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͘tĞĂƌĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƌĞͲĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŶŐĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚůŽŽŬŝŶŐĂƚŶĞdžƚƐƚĞƉƐƚŚĂƚĂůŝŐŶ ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶǁŚŝĐŚĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƐƚŽŵĂŬĞĂƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJƚŽƌĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĞ͕ƌĞũƵǀĞŶĂƚĞĂŶĚƌĞďƵŝůĚ ŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂƐǁĞůůĂƐďĞŐŝŶĂƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƚŽƌĞŵŽǀĞŝŶƚĞƌŝŵĐůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵƉŽƌƚĂďůĞƐĂŶĚĨŝŶĚ ƌŽŽŵŽƌĐƌĞĂƚĞƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĂŶĚĞǀĞŶƚƵĂůůLJĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƚŚĞŵŽƌĞƚŚĂŶϭϲϲ ƉŽƌƚĂďůĞĐůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵƐŝŶŽƵƌĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͘tĞǁŝůůĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJǀĞƌƐƵƐĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚ ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚŝƐŐŽĂůƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĂŶĚŽƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞĂůůƉŽƌƚĂďůĞƐŝŶŽƵƌĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ŝƐŽďƚĂŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŶĞdžƚƐĞǀĞƌĂůLJĞĂƌƐ͘ ƐĂƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶƚƌĂĐŬŝŶŐĂĨĞǁŵĂũŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐǁŚŝĐŚŚĂǀĞĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚĂŶĚǁŝůůĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐΖĨŽƌĞĐĂƐƚƐ͘KŶ DĞĞŬĞƌ^ƚƌĞĞƚŝŶ<ĞŶƚǁĞŚĂǀĞƐĞĞŶƐĞǀĞƌĂůŵĂũŽƌĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚĐŽŵƉůĞdžĞƐ͕ d,K^ĂŶĚDŝĚƚŽǁŶ ϲϰƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞƐĞĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽŚĂǀĞĂŶŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚĂƐƚŚĞLJĨŝůůƵƉƚŚĞŝƌŶĞǁůLJ ďƵŝůƚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ůĞdžŝĂŶ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJWƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĐŽƌŶĞƌŽĨDŝůŝƚĂƌLJZŽĂĚĂŶĚsĞƚĞƌĂŶƐ ƌŝǀĞŝŶ<ĞŶƚĂŶĚǁŝůůďĞŐŝŶŽĐĐƵƉLJŝŶŐŝƚƐϮϴϯƉůĂŶŶĞĚƵŶŝƚƐŝŶϮϬϮϯͲϮϬϮϰ͘ /ŶŽǀŝŶŐƚŽŶ͕ǁĞĂƌĞƚƌĂĐŬŝŶŐĂŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽƵƐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŚŝĐŚŚĂƐďĞĞŶĂƉƉƌŽǀĞĚĂŶĚ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ ŚĂƐ ďĞŐƵŶ͘ dŚĞ ϭϳϬϬͲƵŶŝƚ >ĂŬĞƉŽŝŶƚĞ hƌďĂŶ ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ǁŝůů ĨĂůů ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ŽƵƌ 14 ĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJĂŶĚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶŽĨWŚĂƐĞϰŝƐƐŚŽǁŶƚŽďĞϮϬϮϳ͘ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝŶƚŚĞ<ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƐƚĞĂĚŝůLJƌŝƐŝŶŐŽǀĞƌƚŚĞůĂƐƚĨŽƵƌ LJĞĂƌƐĂŶĚƉůĂŶŶĞĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞŶŽǁďĞŝŶŐƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƚĞĂŵƐŝŶ ŵƵůƚŝƉůĞĐŝƚLJĂŶĚĐŽƵŶƚLJũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐǁĞƐĞƌǀĞ͘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hase 1BPhase 2Phase 3SE 260th St189th Ave SE188th Av e S E 191st Pl SESE 259th Pl193rd Pl SE196th Ave SESE 259th StSE 260th St199th Ave SESE Timberlane Blvd198th Pl SESE 256th StSR 18204th Ave SE 201st Ave SESE 258th St203rd Ave SESE 258th PlPhase 4Phase 1APhasing LegendPhasing MapLakepointe Urban VillagePhasing MapLakepointe Urban Village200400400'0100SCALE: 1" = NNOTE:THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS ANDTRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFICLOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASEDON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THETERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS.January 30, 2017Phase 1B - Approximate Years 2019-2024Phase 2 - Approximate Years 2020-2025Phase 3 - Approximate Years 2023-2028Establishment of final grade, construction of Covington Connector toSoutheast boundary, construction of first phase of commercialdevelopment.Establishment of final lake perimeter, construction of 191st Place SEextension and associated R-12 residential development, construction ofsecond phase of commercial development on peninsula.Construction of third phase of commercial development.Preliminary Plat approval in third quarter 2021. Construction and FinalPlat Recording 2022.Phase 1A - Maple Hills Division 5Phase 4 - Approximate Years 2020-2027Completion of gravel pit reclamation, construction of MR andR-12 residential developmentUpdated September 15, 2021119108817 191st Pl SE Jenkins CreekSE 260th St189th Ave SE188th Av e S E 191st Pl SESE 259th Pl193rd Pl SE196th Ave SESE 259th StSE 260th St199th Ave SESE Timberlane Blvd198th Pl SESE 256th StSR 18204th Ave SE 201st Ave SESE 258th St203rd Ave SESE 258th PlBRCMU PARKS24,956 SF0.57 ACRCMU PARKS97,621 SF2.24 ACMR PARKS110,686 SF2.54 ACR-12 PARKS14,185 SF0.33 ACR-12 PARKS12,500 SF0.29 ACMR PARKS128,425 SF2.95 ACR-12 PARKS32,553 SF0.75 ACR-6 PARKS14,112 SF0.32 ACR-12 PARKS7,254 SF0.17 ACR-6 OPEN SPACE1,880,037 SF43.16 ACR-12 OPEN SPACE572,210 SF13.14 ACR-12 OPEN SPACE4,549 SF0.10 ACR-12 OPEN SPACE34,788 SF0.80 ACRCMU OPENSPACE86,894 SF1.99 ACR-6 PARKS9,908 SF0.23 ACMR PARKS12,799 SF0.29 ACMR OPEN SPACE22,507 SF0.52 ACR-12 OPEN SPACE5,687 SF0.13 ACR-6 OPEN SPACE139,837 SF3.21 ACR-6 OPEN SPACE57,182 SF1.31 ACPCovington ConnectorMaster Development PlanLakepointe Urban VillageMaster Development PlanLakepointe Urban VillageJanuary 30, 2017WetlandWetland BufferUndisturbed Open SpacePublicly Accessible Parks and PlazasMedium Density Residential (R-6)Central Pond FeatureCovington Highlands TrailTrails / Offsite Trail ConnectionsStop LightProposed Park and Ride FacilityTransit StopProposed Truck and Bus Return RoutePublic StreetsHigh Density Residential (R-12)Mixed Residential (MR)Mixed Use / Commercial (RCMU)LegendBBike RouteCENTRAL POND FEATUREGateway ElementSteep Slope and Buffer200400400'0100SCALE: 1" = NProposed Trail ParkingFocal Point / Public Gathering SpotLandscape AreasJenkins CreekPPedestrian / Wildlife UndercrossingNOTE:THE LOCATION OF DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDINGS ROADWAYS ANDTRAILS, IS APPROXIMATE AND DOES NOT VEST TO THIER SPECIFICLOCATION. THE LOCATION OF ALL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASEDON EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AND THETERMS OF THE PLANNED ACTION, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT,AND APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LAWS.Mix of Multi-Family and Commercial isEncouraged within Peninsula AreaUpdated September 15, 2021Disturbed (Graded) Open SpaceSPECIAL PAVEMENTPARKS TABLERCMUMRR-12R-6ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE122,577 SF251,910 SF66,492 SF24,020 SF2.81 AC5.78 AC1.53 AC0.55 ACTOTAL464,999 SF 10.67 ACPOND TABLERCMUMRR-12R-6ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE366,128 SF106,040 SF334,094 SF0 SF8.41 AC2.43 AC7.67 AC0.00 ACTOTAL806,262 SF 18.51 ACOPEN SPACE TABLERCMUMRR-12R-6ZONE SQ FOOTAGE ACREAGE86,984 SF22,507 SF617,234 SF2,077,056 SF1.99 AC0.52 AC14.17 AC47.68 ACTOTAL2,803,691 SF 64.36 ACCOMBINED OPEN SPACE TABLERCMUMRR-12R-6ZONE PARKS2.81 AC5.78 AC1.53 AC0.55 ACTOTAL10.67 AC91.25 AC34.00 AC35.34 AC53.51 AC214.10 ACOPEN SPACE* POND8.41 AC2.43 AC7.67 AC0.00 AC18.51 AC*OPEN SPACE INCLUDES CRITICAL AREAS, BUFFERS, AND OTHER GREEN SPACES13.21 AC8.73 AC23.37 AC48.23 AC93.55 ACNET ACRES**78.03 AC25.27 AC11.98 AC5.27 AC120.55 AC1.99 AC0.52 AC14.17 AC47.68 AC64.36 ACGROSSACREAGETOTALAMENITIESWILDLIFE /PEDESTRIANUNDER-CROSSING**NET ACRES EQUALS GROSS ACREAGE MINUS TOTAL AMENITIESFUTURE CONNECTIONBEYOND PROPERTY BYOTHERS3646125718 VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim capacity for facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students more than functional capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, functional capacity, and no need for additional interim capacity, the District anticipates no need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six- year period to ensure capacity requirement (Noted in section V. Six Yr. Planning Construction). During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced or when possible, be removed due to life expectancy. The Districts goal is to reduce and or eliminate all portables so we may provide an equitable learning environment for all. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. 19 s//ͲWƌŽũĞĐƚĞĚ^ŝdžͲzĞĂƌůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ ƐƐƚĂƚĞĚŝŶ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ/s͕ƚŚĞĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJƐƚƵĚLJŝƐƉĞƌŝŽĚŝĐĂůůLJƵƉĚĂƚĞĚĨŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŶ ƐƉĞĐŝĂůƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚƌĞĨůĞĐƚƐĐůĂƐƐƐŝnjĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐůĂƐƐƐŝnjĞĨůƵĐƚƵĂƚŝŽŶƐĞƚĐ͘ƐƐŚŽǁŶŝŶ ƚŚĞ/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJĂŶĚĂƉĂĐŝƚLJĐŚĂƌƚŝŶdĂďůĞϯ͕ƚŚĞĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJŝƐĂůƐŽƌĞĨůĞĐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJĂŶĚĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚĐŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶĐŚĂƌƚƐ;^ĞĞdĂďůĞƐϱΘϱĂͲďͲĐͿ͘ ŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚŝƐĞůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐĂůůLJƌĞƉŽƌƚĞĚƚŽK^W/ŽŶ&ŽƌŵWͲϮϮϯŽŶĂŵŽŶƚŚůLJďĂƐŝƐĂŶĚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ĂƉƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŵĞŶƚŝƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶŶŶƵĂůǀĞƌĂŐĞ&d ;&d Ϳ͘dŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƐĐŚŽŽůĚĂLJŽĨKĐƚŽďĞƌŝƐ ǁŝĚĞůLJƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞĚĂƐƚŚĞĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚ͞ƐŶĂƉƐŚŽƚŝŶƚŝŵĞ͟ƚŽƌĞƉŽƌƚĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƚŚĞLJĞĂƌ͘ <ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƐƚŽďĞƚŚĞĨŝĨƚŚůĂƌŐĞƐƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ;ďŽƚŚ&d ĂŶĚŚĞĂĚĐŽƵŶƚďĂƐŝƐͿ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ƐƚĂƚĞ ŽĨ tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ͘ dŚĞ WͲϮϮϯ ,ĞĂĚĐŽƵŶƚ ĨŽƌ KĐƚŽďĞƌ ϮϬϮϮ ǁĂƐ Ϯϰ͕ϰϴϮǁŝƚŚ ŬŝŶĚĞƌŐĂƌƚĞŶƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐĐŽƵŶƚĞĚĂƚϭ͘ϬĂŶĚĞdžĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ^ ĂŶĚĐŽůůĞŐĞͲŽŶůLJZƵŶŶŝŶŐ^ƚĂƌƚ ƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ͘ /ŶKĐƚŽďĞƌϮϬϮϮ͕ƚŚĞƌĞǁĞƌĞĂŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůϴϳϳƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐŝŶϭϭƚŚĂŶĚϭϮƚŚŐƌĂĚĞƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŶŐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ZƵŶŶŝŶŐ^ƚĂƌƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂƚĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĐŽůůĞŐĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĐĞŝǀŝŶŐĐƌĞĚŝƚƐƚŽǁĂƌĚďŽƚŚŚŝŐŚ ƐĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚĐŽůůĞŐĞŐƌĂĚƵĂƚŝŽŶ͘KĨƚŚĞƐĞƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐ͕ϰϴϲĂƚƚĞŶĚĞĚĐůĂƐƐĞƐŽŶůLJĂƚƚŚĞĐŽůůĞŐĞ ;͞ĐŽůůĞŐĞͲŽŶůLJ͟Ϳ ĂŶĚ ĂƌĞ ĞdžĐůƵĚĞĚ ĨƌŽŵ &d ĂŶĚ ŚĞĂĚĐŽƵŶƚ ĨŽƌ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ ĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚ ĐŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƐ͘ <ĞŶƚ ^ĐŚŽŽů ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ŚĂƐ ŽŶĞ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŚŝŐŚĞƐƚ ZƵŶŶŝŶŐ ^ƚĂƌƚ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ ƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŽŶƌĂƚĞƐŝŶƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞ͘ ĂƐĞĚ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚ ĨŽƌĞĐĂƐƚƐ͕ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJ ŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJ ĂŶĚ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ͕ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͕ƉŽƌƚĂďůĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJ͕ĂŶĚĨƵƚƵƌĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĐůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵƐƉĂĐĞ͕ƚŚĞ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƉůĂŶƐƚŽĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽƐĂƚŝƐĨLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞŝŶƚĞƌŝŵƵƐĞŽĨƉŽƌƚĂďůĞƐ ;^ĞĞdĂďůĞϱĂŶĚdĂďůĞƐϱĂͲďͲĐͿ͘ tŚŝůĞƚŚĞĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƐŚŽǁƐĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞĚŶĞĞĚŽŶĂƉƵƌĞůLJ ƐƚĂƚŝƐƚŝĐĂůďĂƐŝƐ͕ƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞǀĂƌŝĞƚLJŽĨĞdžƚĞŶƵĂƚŝŶŐĨĂĐƚŽƌƐƚŚĂƚŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ͘dŚĞ<ĞŶƚ ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJŵĂŬĞƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƵƐĞŽĨƉŽƌƚĂďůĞƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚǁĞĚŽŶŽƚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƐƉĂƌƚ ŽĨŽƵƌƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ͘tĞŚĂǀĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚƉŽƌƚĂďůĞƐƉĂĐĞŝŶŽƵƌ ŝŶƚĞƌŝŵ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJĨŝŐƵƌĞƐ͕ĂŶĚǁĞĚŽŶŽƚĐŽƵŶƚƚŚĂƚĂƐĂƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚƐƉĂĐĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶ͘<ĞŶƚŝƐƵŶƵƐƵĂůŝŶ ƚŚĂƚŝƚŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞƐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĂƚůĞĂƐƚϲŵƵŶŝĐŝƉĂůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ<ĞŶƚ͕ ƵďƵƌŶ͕ůĂĐŬŝĂŵŽŶĚ͕DĂƉůĞsĂůůĞLJ͕ZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ĂŶĚ^ĞĂdĂĐ͘dŚĞĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĐŽǀĞƌƐϳϯƐƋƵĂƌĞŵŝůĞƐ ĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŽǀĞƌϰϬƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͘tŝƚŚŝŶƚŚŝƐůĂƌŐĞŐĞŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĂƌĞĂ͕ǁĞĞdžƉĞĐƚƚŽŚĂǀĞƉŽĐŬĞƚƐŽĨ ůŽĐĂůŝnjĞĚĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŶŽƚŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌŝůLJƌĞĨůĞĐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĂŐŐƌĞŐĂƚĞĨŝŐƵƌĞƐ͘ƐŽŶĞ ĞdžĂŵƉůĞ͕ƚŚĞ>ĂŬĞƉŽŝŶƚĞhƌďĂŶsŝůůĂŐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝŶŽǀŝŶŐƚŽŶŵĂLJƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŶĞǁĐůĂƐƐƌŽŽŵ ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJĞǀĞŶĂƐƐƉĂĐĞŵĂLJĞdžŝƐƚŝŶƐĐŚŽŽůƐŽŶƚŚĞĨĂƌŽƚŚĞƌĞŶĚŽĨƚŚĞĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͛ƐďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐ͘ 20 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Actual Permanent Functional Capacity 1 33,847 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) Additional Permanent Classrooms 0000000 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 33,847 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 34,529 Interim Portable Capacity Elementary Portable Capacity Required 3,240 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 336 308 308 308 308 308 308 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 654 540 540 540 540 540 540 Interim Portable Capacity Total 4,230 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 4,040 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 38,077 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 38,569 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 2 24,482 24,659 24,723 24,910 25,099 25,304 25,560 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 13,595 13,910 13,846 13,659 13,470 13,265 13,009 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 May 2023 21 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Actual Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 10,275 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Changes to High School Capacity 0000000 Subtotal 10,275 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 10,097 Portables Interim Capacity 1 654 540 540 540 540 540 540 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 10,929 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637 10,637 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 7,205 7,385 7,386 7,394 7,477 7,588 7,657 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 3,724 3,252 3,251 3,243 3,160 3,049 2,980 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS: Grades 9 - 12 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C May 2023 22 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY 7-8 SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Actual Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 6,220 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Changes to Middle School Capacity 0 000000 Subtotal 6,220 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 7,216 Portable Interim Capacity 1 336 308 308 308 308 308 308 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 6,556 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 7,524 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 3,862 5,837 5,919 5,947 5,927 6,032 6,211 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 2,694 1,687 1,605 1,577 1,597 1,492 1,313 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. MIDDLE SCHOOL: Grades 7 - 8 2022-23 **Middle School: Grades 6-8 2023-24 and Beyond** 2 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Medium Growth Model") P R O J E C T E D G r a d e 6 / 8 2 0 2 3 / 2 4 a n d b e y o n d Middle School Grade 6-8 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B May 2023 23 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY K-6 SCHOOL YEAR 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 16,850 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 000000 Subtotal 16,850 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 16,696 Interim Portable Capacity 3,240 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 3,192 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 / 2 20,090 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 19,888 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 13,415 11,437 11,418 11,569 11,695 11,684 11,692 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 6,675 8,451 8,470 8,319 8,193 8,204 8,196 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Projection Source: Les Kendrick Demographic Study, 2022 ("Medium Growth Model") Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Preschoolers. P R O J E C T E D G r a d e K / 5 2 0 2 3 / 2 4 a n d b e y o n d Elementary Grade K-5 ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 6 Thru 2022-23 **ELEMENTARY: Grades K - 5 2023-24 and Beyond** Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A May 2023 24 s///Ͳ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞWůĂŶ dŚĞĨŝŶĂŶĐĞƉůĂŶƐŚŽǁŶŽŶdĂďůĞϲĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞƐŚŽǁƚŚĞ<ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƉůĂŶƐƚŽĨŝŶĂŶĐĞ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌƚŚĞLJĞĂƌƐϮϬϮϮͲϮϬϮϯƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϮϬϮϴͲϮϬϮϵ͘dŚĞĨŝŶĂŶĐŝŶŐĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ ƐĞĐƵƌĞĚĂŶĚƵŶƐĞĐƵƌĞĚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶŝƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶĨƵƚƵƌĞďŽŶĚŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ƐƚĂƚĞ ƐĐŚŽŽůĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂƐƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͕ĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞ'ƌŽǁƚŚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ ĐƚĂŶĚǀŽůƵŶƚĂƌLJŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶĨĞĞƐƉĂŝĚƉƵƌƐƵĂŶƚƚŽ^ƚĂƚĞ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůWŽůŝĐLJĐƚ͘ /ŶEŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϬϭϲ͕ƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŚĞůĚĂƐƉĞĐŝĂůĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶƚŽĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ ΨϮϱϮ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ŝŶ ďŽŶĚŝŶŐ ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝƚLJ͘ dŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚ ďĞůŽǁĂƌĞƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐ ĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨďŽŶĚƐ;ΨϴϬŵŝůůŝŽŶͿǁĞƌĞŝƐƐƵĞĚŝŶ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϮϬϭϳ͕ǁŚŝĐŚ ĨƵŶĚĞĚ ƚŚĞ ŽǀŝŶŐƚŽŶ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚ ^ĐŚŽŽů͕ ĂƐ ǁĞůů ĂƐŽƚŚĞƌ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘/ŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐǁĞƌĞƵƐĞĚĂƚďŽƚŚZŝǀĞƌZŝĚŐĞ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ^ĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚ<ĞŶƚ>ĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌLJ ĐĂĚĞŵLJƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĚƵĞƚŽĞƐĐĂůĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƉƌŝĐŝŶŐĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞWĂĐŝĨŝĐEŽƌƚŚǁĞƐƚ͘ ĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽZtϴϮ͘ϬϮ͘ϬϵϬ͕ƚŚĞĚĞĨŝŶŝƚŝŽŶŽĨĂŶŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞŝƐΗ͘͘͘ĂƉĂLJŵĞŶƚŽĨŵŽŶĞLJ ŝŵƉŽƐĞĚƵƉŽŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂƐĂĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƚŽƉĂLJĨŽƌƉƵďůŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ ŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽƐĞƌǀĞŶĞǁŐƌŽǁƚŚĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĂƚŝƐƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůLJƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞŶĞǁ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ƚŚĂƚ ĐƌĞĂƚĞƐ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ĚĞŵĂŶĚ ĂŶĚ ŶĞĞĚ ĨŽƌ ƉƵďůŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ ƚŚĂƚ ŝƐ Ă ƉƌŽƉŽƌƚŝŽŶĂƚĞƐŚĂƌĞŽĨƚŚĞĐŽƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĂƚŝƐƵƐĞĚĨŽƌĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚ ƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůLJďĞŶĞĨŝƚƚŚĞŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ǭ/ŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞΖĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůĞƉĞƌŵŝƚ ŽƌĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨĞĞ͘ΗDŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŽƌŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐĐĂŶďĞĐĂůĐƵůĂƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞďĂƐŝƐŽĨΗƵŶŚŽƵƐĞĚ ƐƚƵĚĞŶƚŶĞĞĚΗŽƌΗƚŚĞŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨĂĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚΖƐůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞΗĂƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽŶĞǁƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶͬŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞŵĂLJďĞŝŵƉŽƐĞĚďĂƐĞĚƵƉŽŶĂĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŽĨŝŶƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚĂŶĚͬŽƌŝŶƚĞƌŝŵƉŽƌƚĂďůĞƐĐŚŽŽůƐƉĂĐĞ ŽƌƚŽƉĂLJĨŽƌ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚĂŶĚͬŽƌŶĞǁůLJ ĂĐƋƵŝƌĞĚŝŶƚĞƌŝŵƉŽƌƚĂďůĞƐĐŚŽŽůƐƉĂĐĞƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĂƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚŽĨŐƌŽǁƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͘ĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚΖƐ^ĐŚŽŽůŽĂƌĚŵƵƐƚĨŝƌƐƚĂƉƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŽƌŝŵƉĂĐƚ ĨĞĞƐĂŶĚ͕ŝŶƚƵƌŶ͕ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůŵƵƐƚƚŚĞŶďĞŐƌĂŶƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞŽƚŚĞƌŐĞŶĞƌĂůŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ ŚĂǀŝŶŐƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚLJǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ĐŽƵŶƚŝĞƐ͕ĐŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƚŽǁŶƐ͘;<ĞŶƚ͕ŽǀŝŶŐƚŽŶ͕ZĞŶƚŽŶ͕ ƵďƵƌŶ͕ůĂĐŬŝĂŵŽŶĚ͕DĂƉůĞsĂůůĞLJ͕^ĞĂdĂĐ͕ĂŶĚhŶŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚ<ŝŶŐŽƵŶƚLJͿ dŚŽƵŐŚ ƚŚĞ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĞŶƌŽůůŵĞŶƚ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞ ĨŽƌ ďŽƚŚ ĞůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ĂŶĚ ƐĞĐŽŶĚĂƌLJ ƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂƌĞƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞůLJĨůĂƚ͕ƚŚĞŽŶŐŽŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŽ ŚŽƵƐĞƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐŝƐĂĚƌŝǀŝŶŐŶĞĞĚĂƐƚŚĞƐŚŝĨƚƐŝŶŽƵƌĨĂŵŝůLJƉŽƉƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞ͕ĚƵĞƚŽ ŽŶŐŽŝŶŐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘WƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůLJĐŽůůĞĐƚĞĚ/ŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƐŵĂLJďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ ƚŚĞĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨŝŶƚĞƌŝŵŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJŝŶƵƐĞ͕ƚŚĞ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĂŐĞĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ƚŚĞŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚΖƐůĞǀĞůŽĨƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĞdžƉĂŶƐŝŽŶƐƚŽĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝŶĨƵƚƵƌĞLJĞĂƌƐ͘ dŚĞ<ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽůŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϮϬϮϮͲϮϬϮϯ&WƵƉĚĂƚĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞĚĞdžĞĐƵƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞϮϬϭϲĂƉŝƚĂů ŽŶĚWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ƚŚĞϮϬϭϴ>ĞǀLJWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĚĂƚĂĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨŽƵƌ&ĂĐŝůŝƚLJƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ ZĞƉŽƌƚƐ͘dŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚĂƉŝƚĂůWůĂŶŶŝŶŐdĞĂŵƐŚĂǀĞĐŽŵĞƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌĂŶĚũŽŝŶĞĚƚŚĞĂƉŝƚĂů 25 ŽŶĚWůĂŶŶŝŶŐdĂƐŬ&ŽƌĐĞ;Wd&ͿǁŚŝĐŚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƉĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůƐ͕ƚĞĂĐŚŝŶŐ ƐƚĂĨĨ͕ƐƚƵĚĞŶƚǀŽŝĐĞƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŵĞŵďĞƌƐǁŚŽĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚĞĚĂŶĚĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŶĞĞĚƐ͘ KƵƌŝŶŝƚŝĂůƉůĂŶƌĞǀĞĂůĞĚƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƐĐŚŽŽůƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĚƵĞƚŽĂŐĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌĂĚĚĞĚ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŽ;ϭͿƌĞĚƵĐĞĂŶĚĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞŽƵƌŶĞĞĚĨŽƌƉŽƌƚĂďůĞƐĂŶĚ;ϮͿĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ ŐƌŽǁƚŚĂƐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞ<ĞŶƚƌĞŐŝŽŶĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƐƚŽĞdžƉĂŶĚ͘tĞƐƚĂƌƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂůŝƐƚŽĨϮďŝůůŝŽŶŝŶŶĞĞĚƐ ĂŶĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŝƚĞŵŝnjŝŶŐĂŶĚƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjŝŶŐ͕ǁĞďƌŽƵŐŚƚƚŚĞůŝƐƚŽĨĞƐƐĞŶƚŝĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŽϰϵϱŵŝůůŝŽŶ͘dŚŝƐ ůŝƐƚǁĂƐďƌŽƵŐŚƚďĞĨŽƌĞƚŚĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͛ƐŽĂƌĚŽĨŝƌĞĐƚŽƌƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͘ ĂƉŝƚĂůŽŶĚDĞĂƐƵƌĞĨŽůůŽǁĞĚĂŶĚǁĞŶƚŽƵƚƚŽǀŽƚĞŝŶƉƌŝůϮϬϮϯĂŶĚĚŝĚŶŽƚƉĂƐƐǁŝƚŚǀŽƚĞƌ ĂƉƉƌŽǀĂů͘tĞĂƌĞŶŽǁƌĞͲĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĨŝŐƵƌŝŶŐŽƵƚŶĞdžƚƐƚĞƉƐ͘&ƵƚƵƌĞƵƉĚĂƚĞƐƚŽƚŚŝƐĂƉŝƚĂů &ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐWůĂŶǁŝůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĞƚĂŝůƐŽĨĂŶLJĂĚŽƉƚĞĚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͘tŝƚŚƚŚĞŽƉĞŶŝŶŐŽĨĂŶLJŽŶZŝĚŐĞDŝĚĚůĞ ^ĐŚŽŽů͕ŽƵƌƐŝdžƚŚŐƌĂĚĞŵŽǀŝŶŐĨƌŽŵĞůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJƚŽŵŝĚĚůĞƐĐŚŽŽů͕ĂŶĚŽƵƌďŽƵŶĚĂƌLJĐŚĂŶŐĞ͕ǁĞĂƌĞ ĂĚǀĂŶĐŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽĞǀĞŶŽƵƚĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJĂƚĞĂĐŚƐŝƚĞƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞŽƵƌƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚ ƐƚƵĚĞŶƚͲďĂƐĞĚŶĞĞĚƐ͘ &ŽƌƚŚĞ^ŝdžͲzĞĂƌ&ŝŶĂŶĐĞWůĂŶ͕ĐŽƐƚƐŽĨĨƵƚƵƌĞƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂƌĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐĨƌŽŵ<ĞŶƚ^ĐŚŽŽů ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĂƉŝƚĂůWůĂŶŶŝŶŐdĞĂŵ͘WůĞĂƐĞƐĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϭϯͲϭϰĨŽƌĂƐƵŵŵĂƌLJŽĨƚŚĞĐŽƐƚďĂƐŝƐ͘ ŽƐƚĂƐŝƐ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ &ŽƌŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚĐŽƐƚƐĂƌĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞůĂƐƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ ƐĐŚŽŽůďƵŝůƚŝŶ<ĞŶƚ͕ĂĚũƵƐƚĞĚĨŽƌŝŶĨůĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞĚĐŽƐƚĨƵƚƵƌĞĞůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJƐĐŚŽŽů͕ĂƐ ǁĞůůĂƐĂǀĞƌĂŐĞƉƌŝĐŝŶŐŽĨŶĞĂƌďLJƐĐŚŽŽůĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐƌĞĐĞŶƚůLJďƵŝůƚŶĞǁŵŝĚĚůĞĂŶĚŶĞǁŚŝŐŚ ƐĐŚŽŽůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ WƌŽũĞĐƚ WƌŽũĞĐƚĞĚŽƐƚ EĞǁ ůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌLJ^ĐŚŽŽů Ψϲϴ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ EĞǁDŝĚĚůĞ^ĐŚŽŽů Ψϭϱϱ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ EĞǁ,ŝŐŚ^ĐŚŽŽů ΨϮϮϬ͕ϬϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ ^ŝƚĞĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶŽƐƚ dŚĞƐŝƚĞĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚŝƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂŶĂǀĞƌĂŐĞĐŽƐƚŽĨƐŝƚĞƐƉƵƌĐŚĂƐĞĚŽƌďƵŝůƚŽŶǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ůĂƐƚƚĞŶLJĞĂƌƐ͘WůĞĂƐĞƐĞĞdĂďůĞϳĨŽƌĂůŝƐƚŽĨƐŝƚĞĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐĂŶĚĂǀĞƌĂŐĞƐ͘ ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĚũƵƐƚŵĞŶƚ dŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞĐĂůĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐŽŶƉƉĞŶĚŝdžΘƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂnjĞƌŽͲĚŽůůĂƌŝŵƉĂĐƚĨĞĞƚŽƚĂůĨŽƌƚŚŝƐ LJĞĂƌďƵƚŵĂLJďĞĂĚũƵƐƚĞĚŝĨŶĞĞĚĞĚƉĞƌZtϯϲ͘ϳϬ͘ϭϯϬ;ϮͿ;ďͿƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶ͘ 26 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLANSecured Unsecured ImpactSCHOOL FACILITIES*2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028TOTALLocal & StateState 2 or Local 3Fees 5Estimated EstimatedPERMANENT FACILITIESNo School Projects at this time.$0TEMPORARY FACILITIESAdditional portables 3 - 4$0OTHERN / ATotals$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units.Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities PlanTable 6May 202327 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415Site Acquisitions & CostsAverage of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 YearsType &# on MapSchool / SiteYear Open / PurchasedSoldLocation Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / AcreElementaryNo Acquisitions for Elemenary Schools0.00 $0Elementary Site Subtotal0.00 $0$0Elem site averageMiddle SchoolNo Acquisitions for Middle Schools0.00 $0Middle School Site Subtotal0.00 $0$0Middle Schl Site Avg.Senior HighNo Acquisitions for Senior Highs0.00 $0 $0Senior High Site Subtotal0.00 $0$0Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area.Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 35.Properties purchased prior to 20101 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS) 19842 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard) 19924 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline) 19950.00$05 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property) 199300 09 / Rural Site - McMillan Assemblage (South of MC) 98 - 0410 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288) 199912 / Urban Site - SE 256th Covington (Halleson) 200012a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom) 200412b / Urban Site - SE 256th St. Covington (West of CO) 2004Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre#DIV/0!Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities PlanTable 7May 202228 KENTSCHOOLDISTRICT FACTORSFORESTIMATEDIMPACTFEECALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-Family Elementary (Grades K - 6) 0.248 Elementary 0.130 Middle School (Grades 7 - 8) 0.085 Middle School 0.049 Senior High (Grades 9 - 12) 0.107 Senior High 0.056 Total 0.440 Total 0.235 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student, see side char Elementary 0 Elementary 115 Middle School 850 Middle School 148 Senior High (Academy) 0 Senior High 173 Special Education ?? Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required) 12 Average Site Cost / Acre Middle School (required) 25 Elementary $161,678 Senior High (required) 40 Middle School $0 Senior High $0 New Facility Construction Cost Elementary $68,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $155,000,000 Elementary @ 24 $315,000 Senior High $220,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $315,000 Senior High @ 31 $315,000 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit Elementary 123,702 District Funding Assistance Percentage 51.86% Middle School 10,256 Senior High 21,296 Total 4.4% 155,254 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $246.83 Permanent Facility Square Footage Elementary 1,567,594 Middle School 760,483 District Average Assessed Value Senior High/Other 1,077,315 Single Family Residence $653,485 Total 95.6% 3,405,392 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elementary 1,691,296 Multi-Family Residence $220,293 Middle School 770,739 Senior High/Other 1,098,611 Total 3,560,646 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 $1.02 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0010 Developer Provided Sites / Facilities Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% CPI Inflation Factor 5.20% Budget Preparations | OSPI (www.k12.wa.us) KentSchoolDistrictSixͲYearCapitalFacilitiesPlan (APPENDIXA)May2023 29 KK ENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.248 A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.085 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.107 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.440 A D $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.248 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.085 0.984 $15,252.00 B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.107 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.440 B D $15,252.00 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.248 0.097 $315.74 C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.085 0.016 $14.77 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.107 0.020 $21.75 Total $945,000 84 0.440 C D $352.25 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.248 $3,650.73 D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.085 $1,610.32 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.107 $2,369.52 D D $7,630.57 Tax Credit per Single Family Residence Average SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$653,485 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.77 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r ) 0.10% TC D $5,848.83 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 00FC D 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $15,252.00 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $352.25 Subtotal $15,604.25 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,630.57 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $5,848.83 Subtotal $13,479.40 Total Unfunded Need $2,124.85 50% Developer Fee Obligation $1,062 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) $0 District Adjustment ($1,062) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family ($0.00) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B)May 2023 30 KK ENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary) 12 $161,678 0 0.13 A 2 (Middle School) 25 $0 850 0.049 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High) 40 $0 0 0.056 Total 77 $161,678 850 0.235 A D $0.00 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary) $68,000,000 0 0.13 0.903 B 2 (Middle School) $155,000,000 850 0.049 0.984 $8,792.33 B 3 (Senior High) $220,000,000 0 0.056 0.998 Total $443,000,000 850 0.235 B D $8,792.33 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary) $315,000 24 0.13 0.097 $165.51 C 2 (Middle School) $315,000 29 0.049 0.016 $8.52 C 3 (Senior High) $315,000 31 0.056 0.020 $11.38 Total $945,000 84 0.235 C D $185.40 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization % Student Factor D 1 (Elementary) $246.83 115 0.5186 0.13 $1,913.69 D 2 (Middle School) $246.83 148 0.5186 0.049 $928.30 D 3 (Senior High) $246.83 173 0.5186 0.056 $1,240.12 D D $4,082.11 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$220,293 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.77 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r ) 0.10% TC D $1,971.67 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 3.58% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 00FC D 0 Fee Recap ** A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $0.00 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $8,792.33 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $185.40 Subtotal $8,977.73 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $4,082.11 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $1,971.67 Subtotal $6,053.78 Total Unfunded Need $2,923.95 50% Developer Fee Obligation $1,462 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable) 0 District Adjustment ($1,462) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family ($0.00) Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C)May 2023 31 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % for SCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program new Date Capacity Growth Approximate Approximate # on Map ELEMENTARY MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional Capacity # on Map 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land Use Designation Type 12 256th - Covington (Halleson) 25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom) 25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold Notes: None King County King County Land Use Jurisdiction Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 May 2022 32 ©FRS\ULJKW.52//0$3&203$1<Ζ1&5IJTNBQIBTCFFONPEJGJFECZ,4%6DZ\HU:RRGVElementaryJenkins CreekElementary)DLUZRRGElementary5LGJHZRRGElementary1RUWKZRRG0LGGOH6FKRROLake YoungsElementaryGlenridgeElementaryKentridge +LJK6FKRRO6SULQJEURRNElementary6RRV&UHHNElementary6XQULVHElementaryMeridian0LGGOH6FKRRO.HQWZRRG+LJK6FKRROPark OrchardElementaryMartin 6RUWXQElementary'DQLHOElementaryEast HillElementaryMill Creek0LGGOH6FKRROKent ElementaryKent-Meridian +LJK6FKRRO6FHQLF+LOOElementary.HQW6FKRRO'LVWULFWAdministration Center0HDGRZ5LGJHElementaryPine TreeElementaryHorizonElementaryCovingtonElementaryCedar Heights0LGGOH6FKRROCedar ValleyElementary&UHVWZRRGElementaryMattson0LGGOH6FKRROKentlake+LJK6FKRRONeely O’BrienElementaryCarriage CrestElementaryMeridianElementaryMeeker0LGGOH6FKRROGrass LakeElementaryEmerald Park ElementaryMillenniumElementaryiGradKent Valley Early LearningCenter The Outreach Program (TOP)Panther Lake ElementaryRiver RidgeElementaryKent LaboratoryAcademy334512101212aKENT SCHOOL DISTRICTSITE ACQUISITIONS12b9 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2022 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2022 Plan are summarized here. Capacity changes continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio and program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The District will be moving to a K-5 Elementary and 6-8 Middle School model beginning the 2023-2024 school year. Capacity has been added at the middle school level by reopening the former Sequoia Junior High (now Canyon Ride Middle School). The district worked with Educational Data Solutions, LLC to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility need will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2024 calendar year will result in no collection of impact fees for both Single-Family and Multi-Family due to the capacity study completed in Spring 2023. 34 ITEM Grade /Type FROM TO Increase/ Decrease Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.27 0.248 -0.022 Single Family (SF) MS 0.105 0.085 -0.020 SH 0.075 0.107 0.032 Total 0.45 0.440 -0.010 Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.082 0.130 0.048 Multi-Family (MF) MS 0.035 0.049 0.014 SH 0.029 0.056 0.027 Total 0.146 0.235 0.089 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 52.49% 51.86%-0.63%Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $242.26 $246.83 4.570 Per OSPI Website Link Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $574,784 $653,485 78,701 Per King County AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $360,790 $220,293 (140,497)Per King county Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $0.93 $1.02 $0.09 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 2.45% 3.58% 1.13% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 No Change X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors Include: 35 RESOLUTION NO. ________ EXHIBIT D 2023 Capital Facilities Plan of Renton School District No. 403 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 1 2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Renton School District No. 403 Board of Directors Alisa Louie, President Shelby Scovel, Vice President Avanti Bergquist, MD Stefanie McIrvin, Ed. D Justin Booker Damien Pattenaude, Ed. D, Superintendent July 2023 To Be Adopted by School Board July 12, 2023 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 2 2023 6-YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Annual Update Renton School District No. 403 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS V. GROWTH RELATED PROJECTS VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN VII. IMPACT FEES VIII. APPENDICES Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 3 I. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Capital Facilities Plan: This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) annual update was prepared by Renton School District (the “District”) in compliance with the requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA, the Act), King County Code Title 21A.43, and applicable ordinances of the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. It is the district’s intent that the Plan be adopted by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton as a sub-element of their respective Capital Facilities Plans, and that that those jurisdictions assess and collect school impact fees on behalf of the district, as empowered by the GMA. This Plan, however, is not intended to be the sole planning instrument developed by the district to determine its capital facility needs. The GMA was adopted by the State legislature in 1990 in response to rapidly increasing development, most notably in King County and the surrounding central Puget Sound area. The Act requires state and local governments to manage Washington’s growth by developing and implementing comprehensive land-use and transportation plans, by designating Urban Growth Areas, and by protecting natural resources and environmentally critical areas. The Capital Facilities Plan is one element of a County or City’s Comprehensive Plan that addresses existing public facility capacities, forecasts future public facility needs, presents a plan for expanding existing facilities or constructing new facilities to meet those needs, and indicates how those public facility improvements are to be financed. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as one means of financing new public facilities necessitated by private development. This Capital Facilities Plan addresses the impact of growth on public school facilities by examining: 1. anticipated growth of the district’s student population over the next six years. 2. the ability of existing and proposed classroom facilities to house those students based on the district’s current Standard of Service. 3. the need for additional enrollment or growth driven capital facilities. 4. the method of financing those capital improvements; and 5. calculation of school impact fees based on, among other variables, the number of students generated by recent residential development (student generation factors). Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 4 This plan is updated annually and submitted to local governments for inclusion as a sub-element in their Capital Facilities Plans. Past Plans have been adopted by King County and the Cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton. The district continues to dialogue with the cities of Tukwila and SeaTac regarding implementation of impact fees within their jurisdictions. The new impact fees calculated and associated with this 2023 CFP, are effective Jan 2024. They are further defined in section VII and in the appendices. Overview of the Renton School District: The district is located on the south end of Lake Washington, eleven miles south of Seattle to the west and south of Bellevue to the east. Home to nearly 100,000 people who value working, living, and playing in the Pacific Northwest, Renton has a strong economic base and a favorable business climate. The district spans approximately thirty-two square miles and serves a diverse population of approximately 15,000 students in pre-K through 12th grade at 4 high schools, four middle schools, fifteen elementary schools, and an early childhood learning center. District programs also address the special needs of disabled, academically gifted, and artistically talented students. Four schools (Renton Park Elementary, Hazelwood Elementary, McKnight Middle, and Lindbergh High) are U.S. Department of Education-recognized Blue-Ribbon Schools of Excellence. Community support for Renton schools is strong. School levies, which make up 25% of the district's budget, have been consistently approved by the community for more than 20 years. Voter-approved bond measures or capital facilities levies from 1992 through 2022 have brought exciting improvements in school buildings and support facilities, including the rebuilding of all elementary schools, the remodeling of all middle and high schools, and the recent additional construction of a new elementary school (Sartori) and middle school (Risdon). Voter support has also provided state-of-the-art technology - a must to prepare students for living and working in this leading high-tech region. Every classroom has high-speed Internet connections and ample computer devices for all students. Creating life-long learners is at the heart of Renton School District's instructional goals. Students are encouraged to reach for excellence through a variety of programs that focus on basic academic skills, problem solving, creative and critical thinking, and social and emotional growth. Each year, Renton School District students qualify as National Merit Finalists while the total value of college scholarships earned is in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Elementary level students are well-grounded in science through participation in the Hands-on Science Kit Program, lauded by the National Science Teachers' Association. At the high school level, the district's challenging chemistry program, which provides options for advanced placement college IMPACT FEES effective Jan 2023 effective Jan 2024 CHANGE SINGLE-FAMILY $2,911 $2,161 ($750) MULTI-FAMILY $3,697 $4,257 $560 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 5 credit, has been recognized by the National Science Association, as well as the National Science Foundation. The focus in math is on intensive instruction in the basic skills, supplemented by opportunities to apply developing knowledge to real world problems. The K-12 math program increases student achievement through problem solving, integration of technology, and a rigorous assessment component. Students from elementary to high school levels regularly excel in regional and national mathematics contests. Across all levels and subjects, reading with accuracy and understanding is a primary goal. Elementary students receive a rich exposure to fine literature. Middle and high school students work extensively on reading in the content areas and exploring classic and modern literature works. Reading activities are integrated with a topnotch writing program beginning in kindergarten that provides students with intensive and focused practice for the proficiency in a wide range of language arts skills from creative to business and technical writing. A variety of classes, clubs, and programs give students opportunities to expand their educational horizons and pursue special interests. Choices range from instrumental and music, performing and visual arts, intramurals and athletics, academic-focused and career clubs, and community service opportunities to leadership development programs, business internships, job shadowing, and participation in the annual robotics competition. Special needs students with physical, emotional, and academic disabilities receive individualized attention from skilled teachers. Special education and remedial support are also available and children who are just learning English receive intensive, small-group ESL instruction to supplement their regular classroom learning. Guidance and counseling services are available for primary, middle, and high school students. Intellectually gifted children have many opportunities for extended learning. Operating at two magnet elementary schools and the three middle schools, the Discovery Program offers a challenging curriculum with a special focus on higher level thinking skills. High school students can take advantage of a full range of honors and advanced placement classes. Renton School District staff consistently show a commitment to their most important task - preparing their students for success in work and life. More than 80 percent of certificated staff have five or more years of higher education, and two of every three teachers have advanced degrees in their fields. Several of the district's certificated and classified staff have received the Washington Award for Educational Excellence. Individual teachers have received special honors such as the Christa McAuliffe Award for Excellence in Education, the Outstanding Secondary Science Award, the Washington State High School Social Studies Teacher of the Year Award, and Outstanding College Alumni recognition. Teachers are encouraged to take an active role in promoting their own professional growth through creating and refining curriculum, sharing successful strategies, and looking for new ways to assess student progress. This focus on continuous staff development enables teachers to consistently improve the quality of instruction and prepares them to help students meet rigorous state academic standards. Hundreds of training opportunities are offered to teachers and other staff members each year, ranging from CPR and first aid, technology education, diversity, and crisis intervention to math, science, and reading instruction strategies, assessment techniques, and arts education. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 6 II. ENROLLMENT TRENDS Over the past year, District enrollment continued to decline. There were differences across the region, however. While King County had a net gain of 370 students, public school enrollment in the four-county region (King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish) is still more 23,000 students less than what it was in October 2019. Renton’s decline in enrollment may still be due to the pandemic, but also the continued lower growth rate of immigrant population. Home based instruction also increased in Renton and the surrounding areas. The district will continue to monitor trends, but there are significant conditions that may speak to the potential for enrollment growth in the future. The number of new housing units expected to be developed in the district boundary is larger than what has been experienced in the last decade. Additionally, the most recent economic factors increasing interest rates and inflation appear to be causing a reduction in housing prices, at least in the immediate term. This could drive an influx of new home buyers and new construction in the next few years. Discussion on whether enrollment will return to pre-pandemic levels will continue over the next couple of years with future CFP’s. The early learning model in most cases had been through remote delivery methods and returned to partial in-person learning in 2020-2021. The district returned to in-person learning in the 2021-2022 school year, with families still having an option for a virtual program – but it was not highly utilized. Still, the District will not fully understand the ongoing impact of instructional delivery, the current housing market, fuel increases, among others until further into the next couple of school years. Approval by the community of a 2019 bond measure allowed the district to construct a new elementary school (#16) to accommodate over-enrollment in the K-5 grade span and to provide some elementary capacity relief. Sartori, another new elementary was opened in 2019 as a choice school in the downtown area. Considering the decline in enrollment and the effect of the pandemic, the district chose to supplement the 2020 CFP by further evaluating the enrollment and capacity of the elementary schools located within or near the service areas the new elementary school #16. The conclusion of that analysis reaffirmed the district need for the new elementary school. #16. The new elementary school is scheduled to open this fall (2023) and is discussed later in this Plan. III. STANDARD OF SERVICE & CAPACITY The Renton School District Standard of Service is the standard adopted by the district that identifies the program year, school organizational structure, student/teacher ratios by grade level (considering the requirements of students with special needs), daily class schedule, types of facilities and other factors identified by the district to be beneficial in supporting its educational programs and objectives. The Standard of Service is the major determining factor, together with the number of classrooms (teaching stations), in calculating facility capacity. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 7 The district has adopted a traditional elementary/middle/high school organizational structure that houses kindergarten through Grade 5 in elementary schools, Grades 6 through 8 in middle schools, and Grades 9 through 12 in high schools. The school-year calendar adopted by the District is also traditional; typically beginning in late August and ending in mid-June. Similarly, the District maintains a common daily schedule, with classes beginning between 7:20 and 9:30 a.m. and ending between 2:03 and 3:10 p.m., depending on grade level. The district, and the Renton Education Association, recognize that reasonable class size is necessary for optimum learning, and have established the following targets in student/teacher ratios: Grade Levels K-1 21:1 Grade Level 2 22:1 Grade Level 3 24:1 Grade Levels 4-12 29:1 The 29:1 ratio at the secondary level applies to all Language Arts, Social Studies, Science, Math, World Languages, World Language Exploratory and Health classes. Other ratios apply as follows: Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 Middle School PE 35:1 High School PE 40:1 All other classes 31:1 For the purposes of this report, student /teacher ratio for special education classes held in self- contained classrooms within comprehensive elementary and secondary facilities is assumed to be 12:1. Educational facilities dedicated solely to special education or other specialized programs are excluded from capacity calculations, as are associated student headcounts. In response to new State and District high school graduation requirements, beginning with the 2018-2019 school year, all District high schools changed from a semester system to a trimester system, resulting in the following: x Three 12-week terms instead of two 18-week terms, x Five 72-minute periods per day instead of six 57-minute periods, and x Reduction of classroom efficiency from 83% to 80%, reducing facility capacity. Beginning with the graduating class of 2020-2021, high school graduation requirements require one additional credit of science (three instead of two), and a total of twenty-four credits; three more than the previously required 21. This has impacted high school capacity, especially Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 8 regarding science classrooms, where additional classroom space suitable for the various sciences, or the renovation/upgrade of existing classrooms to accommodate the same, will be necessary. The construction of new science classroom addition at Lindbergh High is one such project included in last year’s update. It is not included in the he calculation of this year’s impact fees or previous year’s impact fees. Student/teacher ratios, referenced earlier, are applicable to both permanent and relocatable classrooms. However, since relocatable facilities do not allow for the full range of educational activities promoted by the district, they are generally viewed as temporary or interim housing, necessary to accommodate enrollment fluctuations and development driven enrollment increases, but only until such time as permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. For those reasons, relocatable classrooms capacities are calculated, but not used in the analysis of future facility needs. Practical Capacity Model: The Practical Capacity Model calculates building capacity based on limitations that existing facilities place on enrollment as a result of current educational program needs, operating policy, and contractual restrictions. This is sometimes also referred to School Program Capacity. The calculation is made by reviewing the use of each classroom/teaching station in each facility. For every room housing student, a calculation is made, assigning a maximum number of students per room. Sometimes the capacity of core facilities, such as the cafeteria or gym, or the quantity of restroom fixtures, may limit facility capacity to a level below that calculated by collective classroom capacity levels. This has generally been reviewed at each school level, giving each school leadership team the ability to utilize classrooms in the most efficient manner possible, considering their current enrollment. In future CFP’s, we may begin to evaluate and report program capacity more specifically and show the impact on overall capacity. For example, if the school enrollment has a higher number of special ed students in a given year, then there is potential for another full classroom/teaching station to be taken out of capacity inventory, thereby reducing the overall school capacity for that given year. Given that we will be entering into a year with boundary adjustments to accommodate the opening of the new elementary school (Hilltop Heritage ES), the 2024 CFP will be a more appropriate year to provide further analysis of enrollment at each school, overall capacity, and program (practical) capacity. Capacity at the secondary school level is further limited by class scheduling restrictions and student distribution among elective classes. Based on a typical middle school six-period day, where one period is designated for teacher planning, capacity is reduced by one-sixth, or 17 percent, of theoretical capacity. Similarly, at high schools, with the newly established five-period day, capacity is reduced by one-fifth, or 20 percent. Elective classes, many of which require specialized classrooms, also figure into the equation for determining a school’s capacity, which together with required classes, require a well thought out Master Schedule if the facility’s capacity is to be maximized. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 9 Current Capacity: Overall building (student) capacity of existing, permanent K-12 facilities, excluding special education facilities and facilities housing alternative learning environments, is 14,788. As mentioned above, the district will begin to look at each school over the next year to better analyze program capacity at each school. When faced with a boundary adjustment this year with the opening of the new elementary school, we learned that the school-student capacity numbers were not completely telling of actual school capacity, when considering each school’s population needs. Based on prior enrollment the district has shown a capacity deficit in the 6-8 grade span in the out years; as well as continued, yet smaller deficit in the K-5 grade span. That deficit has transitioned to a surplus with enrollment decline but will also show more of a surplus when the new elementary school opens this. The opening of the new school this fall is allowing for relief at some of the over-crowded schools, but also allowing the district to intentionally have a lower enrollment at a couple of schools where some building improvements are needed before large new developments finish construction and begin to generate students in the area. We continue to note also that that current and future capacity at the elementary level, as documented in this report, is based on the district’s current Standard of Service, and does not necessarily reflect aspirational K-3 student/teacher ratios of seventeen students to one teacher. The district continues to make progress towards these requirements, by utilizing available classroom space, added staffing and plans to utilize the new elementary school classrooms to work towards this ratio. Most recent ratios have been anywhere from 17.3 to 19:1 but staffing during covid has slowed the districts progress. Continued efforts will be made with opening of the new elementary school providing more classroom space to progress towards the K-3 standard of 17:1. Elementary school capacity has been the district’s greatest challenge. Relying heavily on the use of relocatable classrooms (portables) to accommodate the fluctuating student population, portables at elementary schools account for over 15% of the district’s total K – 5 facility capacity. Portables are not considered permanent structures and are therefore not included in the inventory of permanent facilities. They are viewed as a short-term solution for managing enrollment fluctuation, housing students on a temporary or interim basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. Renton School District’s capital facilities include both permanent structures and relocatable (interim or portable) classrooms. Permanent facilities are further categorized as either K-12 (traditional elementary, middle, and high school configurations), Special Instructional Use, or Non-instructional Support Facilities. The district’s permanent K-12 facilities include 15 (soon to be 16) elementary schools, four middle schools, and four high schools. Two Special Instructional Use facilities house the district’s early childhood, special education, and alternative learning programs. Support facilities include the Kohlwes Education Center (admin.), Transportation Center, Facilities Operations and Maintenance Center, Nutrition Services/Warehouse, Renton Memorial Stadium, and the Lindbergh Swimming Pool. Total permanent facilities encompass 2,595,263 square feet, with 2,417,847 square feet (93%) devoted to K-12 and instructional special use. See Appendix A for District Maps. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 10 The district’s relocatable K-12 facilities are used primarily to address enrollment fluctuations and to house students on an interim or temporary basis until permanent facilities can be constructed. For those reasons they are not considered a long-term solution for housing students and are not acknowledged in the calculation of the capacity of K-12 facilities. Of the fifty-five relocatable facilities in the district’s inventory, forty-four are “double portables” containing two classrooms, and eleven are singles. Combined, they provide the district with a total of ninety-nine relocatable classrooms, encompassing 88,704 square feet of additional space available for instruction. The tables below summarize existing K-12 facility capacity. A complete inventory of District facilities, including undeveloped property follows. Facility capacity worksheets may be found in the appendices. EXISTING FACILITY CAPACITY Facility Elementary Middle High Type Schools Schools Schools Total Permanent 6,895 84.6% 3,435 88.3% 4,458 98.0% 14,788 89.1% Relocatable 1,252 15.4% 457 11.7% 92 2.0% 1,801 10.9% Total 8,147 100% 3,892 100% 4,550 100% 16,589 100% CAPACITY BY SERVICE AREA Facility Type Lindbergh Hazen Renton High Total Elementary Permanent 1843 2423 2075 6341 Relocatable 183 618 451 1252 Total Elem 2026 3041 2526 7593 Middle Permanent 896 1745 794 3435 Relocatable 183 183 91 457 Total Elem 1079 1928 885 3892 High Permanent 1211 1462 1389 4062 Relocatable 92 0 0 92 Total Elem 1303 1462 1389 4154 Grand Total 4408 6431 4800 15639 1. Does not include Sartori Elementary and Talley High, as they are not associated with a particular service area. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 11 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF RELOCATEABLE CLASSROOMS Building ID Location Number of School ID Area Student Classrooms Numbers (sq. ft.) Capacity 53 McKnight Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 54 Nelsen Middle 2 7/8 1,792 46 55 Nelsen Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 56 Nelsen Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 57 Nelsen Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 59 Lindbergh High 1 2 896 21 60 Lindbergh High 1 3 896 21 61 Lindbergh High 1 4 896 21 62 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 2 896 29 64 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 1 896 29 65 Dimmitt Middle 1 3 896 23 66 Dimmitt Middle 1 4 896 23 69 Honey Dew Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 70 Talbot Hill Elementary 1 3 896 29 72 McKnight Middle 2 3/4 1,792 46 73 Lakeridge Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 74 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 77 McKnight Middle 2 5/6 1,792 46 78 McKnight Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 79 Dimmitt Middle 2 1/2 1,792 46 80 Honey Dew Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 81 Cascade Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 82 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 83 Lindbergh High 2 5/6 1,792 42 84 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 85 Dimmitt Middle 1 5 896 23 86 Dimmitt Middle 1 6 896 23 87 Dimmitt Middle 1 7 896 23 88 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 89 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 90 Honey Dew Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 91 Honey Dew Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 92 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 93 Spring Glen 2 1/3 1,792 46 94 Spring Glen 2 2/4 1,792 46 95 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 96 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 97 Cascade Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 98 Cascade Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 99 Lakeridge Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 100 Lakeridge Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 101 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 3A/3B 1,792 58 102 Campbell Hill Elementary 2 4A/4B 1,792 58 103 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 1/2 1,792 58 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 12 104 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 105 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 106 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 107 Sierra Heights Elementary 2 7/8 1,792 58 108 Tiffany Park Elementary 2 3/4 1,792 58 109 Bryn Mawr Elementary 2 5/6 1,792 58 110 Hazelwood Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 111 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 9/10 1,792 58 112 Maplewood Heights Elementary 2 11/12 1,792 58 113 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 1A/1B 1,792 58 114 Talbot Hill Elementary 2 2A/2B 1,792 58 Total 99 88,704 2,669 *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 13 INVENTORY AND CAPACITY OF PERMANENT FACILITIES NAME LOCATION AREA (ft 2) CAPACITY Benson Hill 18665 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 67,533 520 Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 49,157 338 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 57,072 332 LSCascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59,164 467 OHazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 66,161 591OHHighlands 2727 NE 7th St., Renton, 98056 60,000 547 SCHoney Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 54,620 336 YRAKennydale 1700 NE 28th St., Renton, 98056 65,169 622 TNLakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 52,958 398 EMMaplewood Hgts. 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 56,220 402 LERenton Park 16828 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 65,955 476 ESartori 332 Park Ave. N, Srenton, 98057 76,797 554 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 53,992 472 Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 57,844 460 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 58,758 380 Total Grades K-5 Capacity 901,400 6,895 Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 109,070 794 SEMcKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 126,706 847 DDLLONelsen I2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 124,234 896 MCHOSRisdon 6928 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle 98056 136,582 898 Total Grades 6-8 Capacity 496,592 3,435 SLHazen 1101 Hoquiam Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 327,395 1,462 OLindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 242,662 1,211 CHORenton 400 S 2nd St., Renton, 98057 278,373 1,389 H SGTalley 7800 S 132nd St., Renton, 98178 70,831 397 HITotal Grades 9-11 Capacity 919,261 4,458 TOTAL GRADE LEVELS K-12 2,317,253 14,788 Meadow Crest EEC 1800 Index Ave. NE, Renton, 98056 68,752 464 NGLTNIHOME Program - Spring Glen 2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 7,005 84 ARARenton Academy - Spring Glen E2607 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 24,837 48 LTotal Instructional Special Use 100,594 596 Total Instructional Facilities 2,417,847 15,384 SFacilities Operations Center 7812 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 21,894 ECIKohlwes Educational Center 300 SW 7th St., Renton, 98057 57,000 VRLindbergh Pool 16740 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 13,600 SETNutrition Services / Warehouse 409 S Tobin St., Renton 98057 27,466 RORenton Memorial Stadium P405 Logan Ave. N, Renton, 98057 37,213 PTransportation Center 420 Park Ave. N, Renton, 98057 20,243 SUTotal Support Services 177,416 Total All Permanent Facilities 2,595,263 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 14 RELOCATABLE FACILITY CAPACITY BY SCHOOL* ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity Bryn Mawr 8212 S 118th St., Seattle, 98178 88, 89, 109 5,376 174 Campbell Hill 6418 S 124th St., Seattle, 98178 95, 96, 101, 102 7,168 232 Cascade 16022 - 116th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 81, 97, 98 5,376 174 Hazelwood 7100 - 116th Ave. SE, Newcastle, 98056 110 1,792 58 Honey Dew 800 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98059 69. 80. 90. 91 7,168 232 Lakeridge 7400 S 115th St., Seattle, 98178 73, 99, 100 5,376 174 84, 103, 104, 105, Maplewood Heights 130 Jericho Ave., Renton, 98059 111, 112 10,752 348 Sierra Heights 2501 Union Ave. NE, Renton, 98058 74, 82, 106, 107 7,168 232 62, 64, 70, 113, Talbot Hill 2300 Talbot Rd., Renton, 98055 114 6,272 203 Tiffany Park 1601 Lake Youngs Way, Renton, 98058 92, 108 3,584 116 Elementary School Total Capacity 60,032 1943 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity 65, 66, 79, 85, 86, Dimmitt 12320 - 80th Ave. S, Seattle, 98178 87 6,272 161 McKnight 2600 NE 12th St., Renton, 98056 53, 72, 77, 78 7,168 184 Nelsen 2304 Jones Ave. S, Renton, 98055 54, 55, 56, 57 7,168 184 Middle School Total 20,608 529 HIGH SCHOOLS Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity Lindbergh 16426 - 128th Ave. SE, Renton, 98058 59, 60, 61, 83 4,480 105 High School Total 4,480 105 INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL USE Area Location Address Building ID (sq. ft.) Capacity 2607 Jones Ave. S, Spring Glen Renton, 98055 93, 94 3,584 92 Special Education Total 3,584 92 TOTAL ALL RELOCATABLE 88,704 2669 CLASSROOMS *Capacity based on Standard of Service and not actual use Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 15 UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY Skyway Site S Langston Rd. & 76th Ave. S, Seattle 4.18 Acres Chelan Ave. Site Chelan Ave. NE & NE 12th St., Renton 10.80 Acres* Park Ave. N Site Park Ave. N & N 3rd St., Renton 0.31 Acres Park Ave. N Site Park Ave. N & N 5th Ave., Renton 0.45 Acres *Currently under construction – new Hilltop Heritage Elementary School to open fall 2023 IV. ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Projection Methodology: Numerous methodologies are available for projecting long-term enrollments. The most common method is known as cohort survival which tracks groups of students through the system and adjusts the populations to account for the average year-to- year growth. For example, this year’s fourth grade is adjusted based on the average enrollment trend of the past in order to estimate next year’s fifth grade enrollment. This calculation method considers the past five years’ trends to determine the average adjustment factor for each grade, or cohort. The method works well for all grades except kindergarten, where there is no previous year data. For kindergarten, two methodologies are generally used: A linear extrapolation from the previous five years of kindergarten enrollment, assuming that there is a trend; or, alternatively, a comparison of the kindergarten enrollment to births from five years prior can be used to calculate a “birth-to-k” ratio. For example, kindergarten enrollment in 2019 is divided by the total births in King County in 2014 to produce a birth-to-k ratio. The average ratio for the last five years can then be applied to births in subsequent years to estimate kindergarten enrollment. The cohort survival method has been used by OSPI to predict enrollment for all Districts in the state. In past years, OSPI has used a 6-year cohort average for grades 1-12 and a linear extrapolation method at kindergarten. In 2008, OSPI commissioned a study to evaluate the effectiveness of this method for predicting enrollment. The report recommended the use of the “birth-to-k” method for predicting kindergarten enrollment and the use of a housing adjustment factor for Districts that are likely to be impacted by large numbers of new housing developments. The cohort survival method generally works well for Districts that have a consistent trend of gradual increases or declines in enrollment. It is less reliable in Districts where spikes in demographic trends (especially a marked increase or decrease in new housing) can lead to dramatic swings in enrollment from one year to the next. In addition, the use of the linear extrapolation method at the kindergarten level can result in a distorted trend since it does not consider changes in birth rate trends. Combining cohort survival with other information about births, housing, regional population trends, and even trends in service area and private school enrollment can sometimes provide for a more accurate forecast. For this Plan, the average rollup Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 16 at existing grades was combined with estimates of growth that might be expected from new housing, and assumptions about market share gains or losses that the district is likely to see at certain grade levels. Estimates of housing growth for this model were obtained from building permit information provided by the respective jurisdictions. However, there are many unknowns due to the overall market pause in real estate, rising gas prices, inflation, and some still consider the pandemic to be of concern. The districts response to this was to consider three projections: a low, medium, and high. Due to inflation and rising interest rates, real estate prices are leveling off and decreasing in some neighborhoods. Considering the relative prices seen in Renton as compared to outlying and more expensive suburban area, this could drive a higher-than-expected growth rate. Because the District needs to be as prepared as possible for a higher growth rate, we are monitoring all three scenarios. There is more potential for growth in the K-5 and high school grade span in the outyears and some decline is anticipated in the 6-8 grade span. Projections and Future Capacity: Enrollment projections provided by Educational Data Solutions, LLC indicate continued decline in the elementary grade span over the next couple of years, with a minor decrease in middle school and high school enrollment at varied years, but overall, a relatively flat rate in the big picture. Using the high-level growth chart, overall enrollment in the out-years is projected to grow by about six hundred students spread over all three grades spans, but still does not project we are back to pre-pandemic enrollment levels until after October 2028. The district will continue to monitor development, move-in/move-outs, and trends within the four-county area to better predict enrollment more than two years out. As the District moves past the pandemic and related impacts, there is potential for development growth in the real estate market and for a resurgence of immigrant population with recent political administration changes at the national level. The local jurisdiction is still planning on over 5,000 new residential units in various areas over the next 2-10 years. It is the district’s responsibility to monitor these projects, the timing and how the district will be able to respond with appropriate capacity to accommodate instructional delivery. The number of new homes planned for future construction in the District is much higher than the number of permitted units that were built between 2017 and 2021.This may suggest than enrollment losses could be lower in the near terms but could see net gains in the out-years due to growth from new housing. (see past and future housing development in the appendices) Projections show a slight increase in middle school enrollment over the next six years if considering the high growth projections. There are currently no plans to increase middle school capacity, as even with a slight growth, enrollment would still not be back to pre-pandemic levels. Using the same high projection at the high school level, projected enrollment over the next six years will add an additional 185 students. If these projections hold in the near term, this growth could coincide with district plans to replace Renton High School. As part of the voter approved November 2022 bond, funds are provided for both land acquisition and construction of a new Renton High School. The 2024 CFP will address this more completely as the district determines location and construction period. Medium range and high range projections are provided in the appendices. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 17 V. ENROLLMENT DRIVEN FACILITY NEEDS With the opening of the new Sartori Elementary School in August 2018, the 2017 elementary deficit capacity of 1,244 was dramatically reduced by nearly 40% to 755. With the passage of the 2019 Bond Measure, approved by the voters in November 2019, the District is will be opening its sixteenth elementary school, located in the Hazen High School service area, where the district has experienced the most recent growth in the past decade plus. The new school is scheduled to be completed and opened for the 2023/2024 school year. This new school has been named Hilltop Heritage Elementary School. Enrollment declines since fall 2020 show a loss of students from 7,057 students to 6,732 students in fall 2022. While this helps to balance out enrollment vs. capacity in this current school year, we will see an increase in capacity this fall with the new school opening. However, projections do show growth in this grade span by another 413 students in the out years. At the middle school level, decreased enrollment combined with lower projections show that the district will continue to have a small surplus in the next year. We will continue to monitor, but there are currently no enrollment or growth driven capital facilities projects in the planning stages for middle schools. However, there is discussion for future bond planning, the need to replace both Nelson Middle School and Dimmitt Middle School. Those projects would be reviewed in future bond planning discussions and enrollment growth and projections would be considered at that time. As previously mentioned, the 2022 voter-approved bond allows the district to acquire property and plan for the replacement of Renton High School. This will be both an opportunity to add program capacity to address anticipated and projected growth in the out years, but to also ensure program equity across the high school grade space. The district desires to ensure educational space and opportunity is provided and comparable to what is offered at both Hazen and Lindberg High Schools. PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH ACTUAL OCT. 2021/2022 HEADCOUNT ACTUAL 0CT. 2022/23 HEADCOUNT OCT. 2028/29 PROJECTED HEADCOUNT (high) ACTUAL CHANGE 2021/22 - 2022/23 ACTUAL CHANGE (%) 2021/22 to 2022/23 PROJECTED CHANGE 2022/23 to 2028/29 PROJECTED PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2022/23 TO 2028/29 ELEMENTARY 6,745 6,648 7,061 (97.00) (0.01)413 6.21% MIDDLE 3,451 3,227 3,328 (224.00) (0.06)101 0.03 HIGH 4,226 4,318 4,503 92 2.18%185 0.04 other/alt 170 178 194 8 - 16 - TOTAL 14,592 14,371 15,086 (221.00) (0.02)715.00 0.05 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 18 In addition to any discussion around projected permanent facility deficits at the elementary and high school levels, it should be noted that the District is also reaching its maximum limit in providing portable classrooms at its existing sites due to current land use and building code requirements. Although not included in the calculation of potential Impact Fees, the implementation of new relocatable classrooms and/or the relocation of existing ones, remains a viable method of addressing both growth and the shifting of student population, for the short term. Similarly, science classroom additions proposed for Lindbergh High School, as well as other potential high school renovations, additions, or relocations responding to enrollment growth and/or changes in capacity methodology, are not included in the calculation of these fees. Those current projects are more related to program needs and existing enrollment. We have not considered these projects to be added capacity at the high school grade span. The next table compares the current permanent capacity of Renton School District facilities to current and projected enrollment for the next six years. As noted earlier, the district will take a closer look at overall permanent capacity compared to practical or program capacity this next year and will report those findings in the 2024 CFP. *22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 **PERMANENT CAPACITY 6,895 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 7,545 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 6,732 6,680 6,642 6,848 6,957 7,040 7,142 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY)163 865 903 697 588 505 403 **PERMANENT CAPACITY 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 3,435 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 3,301 3,197 3,202 3,375 3,418 3,417 3,407 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY)134 238 233 60 17 18 28 **PERMANENT CAPACITY 4,458 4,458 4,458 4,542 4,542 4,542 4,542 STUDENT ENROLLMENT 4,348 4,432 4,470 4,519 4,439 4,482 4,537 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT CAPACITY)110 26 (12) 23 103 60 5 *current enrollment medium range projection - 23/24 and 24/25 high range projection - 25/26 and beyond **permanent capacity will be adjusted to program capacity in CFP 2024 SURPLUS / DEFICIT CAPACITY PROJECTIONS 1 2023/24 - 2028/29 1. Does not include relocatable facilities (portables) ELEM. K-5 MIDDLE 6-8 HIGH 9-12 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 19 Capital Construction Plan: For the last six-year period, the district’s highest priorities have been to address existing and projected facility capacity deficits, aging infrastructure at secondary schools, and responding to/planning for both growth and program related added capacity. These projects funded by the 2019 bond and impact fees, are projects responding to growth. This has included: x Completion of Hilltop Heritage Elementary school - most of the growth has occurred and relief is needed at some schools in the Hazen High School service area – in the elementary grade-span. x High school additions and/or renovations to create additional science classroom/laboratory space to address changes in State graduation requirements x Planning for replacement of Renton High School, Dimmitt Middle School and/or Nelson Middle School – all aging facilities and potentially impacted by growth x Acquisition of land for future development x Addition and or relocation of relocatable classrooms (interim classroom space known as portables) During the next six years, the district’s voter approved bond on the Nov. 8, 2022, election ballot will allow the district to stay on track to make major renovations, replacements, and upgrades to keep our schools in top operating condition, while protecting taxpayer investments in our buildings and helping maintain high property values. Currently, these are not growth generated projects. These include: Safety & Security x Interior door hardware/lock updates x New key system x Main entry video intercoms x Entryway improvements to provide front door line-of-sight for office staff School Improvements x Update seismic and structural systems in older buildings (retrofitting and modification of existing structures to make them more resistant to seismic activity, ground motion, or soil failure) x Improvements and equipment replacement of school Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) systems x Upgrades to electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems x Upgrades to boilers and domestic hot water heaters Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 20 Purchase Property x Provide for up to forty acres for a Renton High School replacement Build New Renton High School – at a location to be determined x Build a new high school facility for the Renton High School service area, providing a modern learning environment and equitable athletic opportunities for all students The District’s intent in structuring its capital improvement program is to maintain a constant level of construction throughout the program period to optimize the utilization of its management capabilities. The District utilizes a combination of in-house project management (Capital Projects Office) and outside management consultants to accomplish this. VI. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Finance Plan: The primary funding sources for all capital construction projects scheduled over the next six years include 2019 Bond funds, remaining funds from the 2016 capital levy; and school impact fees currently collected by King County and the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton throughout 2023, as growth projects that addressed past capacity deficits are completed. Growth driven projects funded by past collected impact fees and 2019 bond funds are nearing completion. The district also has funds from a voter approved bond in November 2023 for $676 million. The majority of those funds will be directed towards land acquisition and the replacement of Renton High School, as previously described. While there could be placement of temporary facilities or portables due to growth over the next six years at various locations, depending upon enrollment growth - the district does not yet know if the replacement of the high school will need to increase capacity due to growth. This project will not begin for 2-3 years, due to the need for land acquisition. If enrollment and projections show additional capacity is needed to accommodate growth, we will evaluate the collection of impact fees at that time. Enrollment driven projects represent only a portion of the district’s total capital improvement plan. Estimated expenditures for enrollment driven projects over the duration of this six-year plan are indicated below. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 21 II. IMPACT FEES Impact Fees: Impact fees were calculated in conformance with King County Council Ordinance 11621, resulting in a decrease in impact fees for single-family of $750.00 per unit – now set at $2161.00, and an increase in impact fees for multi-family of $560.00 per unit – now set at $4,257.00. Student generation factors were generally the same this year, with a slight increase in multi- family – primarily due to the presence of more low-income units and units with multiple bedrooms. Calculations in 2022 included increased construction costs, and while costs have continued to increase, the district has not added additional construction costs into the calculation for 2023. Assessed and taxable values have increased for both single family and multi-family units, as have bond interest rates. The construction of the new elementary school was front funded by the district and was constructed to address growth in the district. The district will continue collection of impact fees to help offset related costs and will be evaluated on an annual basis moving forward. The 2024-25 CFP will review enrollment, projections, and projected growth to determine if any growth-related projects are needed to address potential capacity deficits moving forward in any of the grade spans. The GMA empowers jurisdictions to assess and collect impact fees as a means of supplementing the funding of additional public facilities necessitated by enrollment growth from new development. In the case of public schools, impact fees are assessed only on residential new development. To determine an equitable school impact fee throughout unincorporated King County, King County Code 21A was adopted, establishing an impact fee formula that has in turn been adopted by the cities of Bellevue, Newcastle, and Renton, in their respective enabling ordinances. The formula requires that school districts establish “Student Generation Factors” that estimate the number of students generated by each new single or multi-family residential unit constructed and establish district-specific construction costs that are unique to that district. Refer to appendices for substantiating documentation on Student Generation Factors. SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN - GROWTH DRIVEN PROJECTS *2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Total Secured2 Unsecured3 New Elem. School 60 6 2 68 60 8 Science Classroom 15 5 5 25 25 Land Acquisition 26 8 7 1 portables 111 10 10 3 Total 78 18 1 0 10 0 101 102 12 *2022/23 and prior 3. Unsecured funds include future school impact fees and potential bond initiatives. Project Estimated Expenditures 1 ($1,000,000's)Funding ($1,000,000's ) 1. Estimated expenditures based on total project cost, including hard and soft costs. 2. Secured funding includes 2019 bond monies, and previously collected school impact fees. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 22 Other factors influencing impact fees include: Site Acquisition Costs - the estimated cost per acre to purchase property. Building Acquisition Cost - the estimated cost to construct facilities unique to the district. Temporary Facility Cost - the estimated cost per classroom to purchase and install a relocatable classroom, including site work and utilities. State Funding Assistance Credit - the amount of funding provided by the State, subject to District eligibility, based on a construction cost allocation and funding assistance percentage established by the State. Tax Credit – Driven by assessed property values, taxation rate, and Bond interest rates. IMPACT FEES effective Jan 2023 effective Jan 2024 CHANGE SINGLE-FAMILY $2,911 $2,161 ($750) MULTI-FAMILY $3,697 $4,257 $560 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 23 XIII. APPENDICES RSD BOUNDARY MAP - MUNICIPALITY OVERLAY Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 24 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Grades K-1 21:1 Grade 2 22:1 Grade 3 24:1 Grades 4-5 29:1 Scheduling Efficiency 1.00 Program Efficiency 1.00 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 SARTORI 32 8 4 4 6 3 7 554 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 TOTAL 430 109 52 50 63 32 116 6,895 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap BENSON HILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 BRYN MAWR 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 CASCADE 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 HAZELWOOD 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 HONEY DEW 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 LAKERIDGE 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 RENTON PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 SARTORI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 SIERRA HGTS. 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TALBOT HILL 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TIFFANY PARK 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 65 0 0 13 32 1 19 1,252 8,147 Permanent Teaching Stations Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 25 LINDBERGH SERVICE Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap AREA BENSON HILL 32 8 3 3 6 4 8 520 CASCADE 31 7 4 0 7 3 10 467 RENTON PARK 32 7 3 3 6 2 11 476 TIFFANY PARK 27 8 3 3 2 2 9 380 TOTAL 122 30 13 9 21 11 38 1,843 Relocatable Classrooms LINDBERGH SERVICE Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total AREA Cap BENSON HILL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 520 CASCADE 6 0 0 4 0 0 2 96 563 RENTON PARK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 476 TIFFANY PARK 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 87 467 TOTAL 10 0 0 4 3 0 3 183 2,026 Permanent Teaching Stations HAZEN SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap HAZELWOOD 32 9 4 4 7 2 6 591 HONEY DEW 22 7 4 4 0 1 6 336 KENNYDALE 33 9 3 5 8 2 6 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 26 11 5 2 0 2 6 402 SIERRA HGTS. 29 8 4 3 4 3 7 472 TOTAL 110 27 16 14 12 8 25 1,832 Relocatable Classrooms HAZEN SERVICE AREA Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total Cap HAZELWOOD 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 591 HONEY DEW 8 0 0 0 6 0 2 174 510 KENNYDALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 622 MAPLEWOOD HGTS. 12 0 0 3 9 0 0 333 735 SIERRA HGTS. 8 0 0 1 3 0 4 111 583 TOTAL 28 0 0 4 18 0 6 618 2,450 Permanent Teaching Stations RENTON HIGH SERVICE Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap AREA BRYN MAWR 25 7 3 5 0 1 9 338 CAMPBELL HILL 25 6 2 6 0 2 9 332 HIGHLANDS 32 8 4 3 7 2 8 547 LAKERIDGE 26 6 3 3 4 2 8 398 TALBOT HILL 26 8 3 2 6 1 6 460 TOTAL 109 28 12 14 17 7 31 1,737 Relocatable Classrooms RENTON HIGH SERVICE Total K-1 2 3 4-5 Sped Other Cap Total AREA Cap BRYN MAWR 6 0 0 0 5 0 1 145 483 CAMPBELL HILL 8 0 0 3 5 0 0 217 549 HIGHLANDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 547 LAKERIDGE 6 0 0 0 1 0 5 29 427 TALBOT HILL 5 0 0 2 0 1 2 60 520 TOTAL 19 0 0 5 6 1 7 306 2,043 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 26 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 PE 35:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 Scheduling Efficiency 0.83 Program Efficiency 0.95 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total Core PE Band Choir SPED Other Support Cap DIMMIT 41 21 3 1 1 4 5 6 794 MCKNIGHT 41 25 3 1 1 4 5 2 847 NELSEN 52 22 3 1 1 2 9 14 896 RISDON 47 24 3 2 1 7 4 6 898 TOTAL 181 92 12 5 4 17 23 28 3,435 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total Core SPED Support Cap Total Cap DIMMIT 4 4 0 0 91 885 MCKNIGHT 8 8 0 0 183 1,030 NELSEN 8 8 0 0 183 1,079 RISDON 0 0 0 0 0 898 TOTAL 20 20 0 0 457 3,892 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 27 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY FACTORS: Student/Teacher Ratios: Core Classes 29:1 (24:1 Talley) PE 40:1 Band/Orchestra 40:1 Choir 50:1 SPED 12:1 Other 31:1 (24:1 Talley) Scheduling Efficiency 0.80 Program Efficiency 0.90 Permanent Teaching Stations SCHOOL Total Core PE Band Choir SPED Other Support Cap HAZEN 78 44 3 2 1 7 18 3 1,462 LINDBERGH 55 32 3 1 1 6 11 1 1,211 RENTON 68 34 3 1 1 7 16 6 1,389 TALLEY 24 13 1 0 0 1 6 3 397 TOTAL 225 123 10 4 3 21 51 13 4,458 Relocatable Classrooms SCHOOL Total Core SPED Support Cap Total Cap HAZEN 0 0 0 0 0 1,462 LINDBERGH 5 4 1 0 92 1,303 RENTON 0 0 0 0 0 1,389 TALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 397 TOTAL 5 4 1 0 92 4,550 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 28 STUDENT GENERATION RATES (SGR) The formula for determining school impact fees, as established by King County Council Ordinance 11621, requires that school districts provide “student factors based on district records of average actual student generation rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation.” The Ordinance also provides that, in the event this information is not available in the District, “data from adjacent districts, districts with similar demographics, or county-wide averages must be used.” In years past, the district used average SGR’S from nearby districts. Starting with the 2021 CFP, the district began using its own SGR derived from residential projects with the district. The district used those SGR’s again for the 2022 CFP - due to paused construction and covid impacts on enrollment. Student generation rates have been updated this year and are included in impact fee calculations. There is not a significant difference is student generation rates from 2021 generated rates. The multi-family rate is higher at 28 per one hundred vs. 24 per one hundred. This slightly higher rate is likely due to presence of more low-income units and units with multiple bedrooms. STUDENT GENERATION RATES Elementary Middle School High School (K-5) (6-8) (9-12) Total SINGLE-FAMILY 0.146 0.046 0.089 0.281 MULTI-FAMILY 0.146 0.065 0.069 0.280 The student generation rate varies among apartment developments, based on whether the units are for low-income residents and based on the number of bedrooms in each unit. These differences can help the district when planning for future growth from housing. Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 29 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 30 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 31 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 32 Prepared by: T.Brewer-Rogstad W:\Board Meetings\2023.07.08\2023 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN.docx 33 2022/23 2023/2024 CHANGE Elementary 6,895 6,895 0 Middle 3,435 3,435 (0) High 4,458 4,458 0 Total 14,788 14,788 (0) 2021/22 2022/2023 CHANGE Elementary 6,820 6,732 (88) Middle 3,512 3,301 (211) High 4,263 4,348 85 Total 14,595 14,381 (214) Jan 2023 eff. Jan 2024 eff.CHANGE Single-Family 2,911 2,161 (750) Multi-Family 3,697 4,257 560 2022 2023 CHANGE Single-Family Elementary 0.154 0.146 (0.008) Middle 0.065 0.046 (0.019) High 0.062 0.089 0.027 Total 0.282 0.281 (0.001) Multi-Family Elementary 0.137 0.146 0.009 Middle 0.042 0.065 0.023 High 0.060 0.069 0.009 Total 0.240 0.280 0.040 2022 2023 CHANGE Land Acquisition per Acre 650,000 650,000 0 Temp. Building Acquisition 177,000 177,000 0 State Match Percentage 0.3133 0.3615 0.0482 Ave. Taxed Value - Single 652,512 769,979 117,467 Ave. Taxed Value - Multi 350,337 308,241 (42,096) Bond Interest Rate 2.45% 3.58% 1.13% Tax Rate per $1000 1.09602 1.09602 0.00000 Construction Cost Allocation 246.83 246.83 0 taxed values vs. appraised -mh CHANGES FROM PREVIOUS PLAN PERMANENT FACILITY CAPACITY (Students) STUDENT ENROLLMENT (October Headcount) STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEE FACTORS IMPACT FEES RESOLUTION NO. ________ EXHIBIT E Renton Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan And Rate Study For Impact Fees ŵĞŶĚĞĚͲ Back to Top Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 CAPITAL PLANNING REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 DEFINITION OF CAPITAL FACILITIES .............................................................................................................. 5 1.4 PRINCIPLES GUIDING CAPITAL INVESTMENTS .............................................................................................. 5 1.5 RRFA HISTORY AND GOVERNANCE ............................................................................................................... 5 1.6 SERVICE AREA ............................................................................................................................................... 6 1.7 CURRENT CONDITIONS AND PROJECTED GROWTH ...................................................................................... 7 2.0 INVENTORY OF EXISTING RRFA CAPITAL FACILITIES .................................................................................. 8 2.1 BUILDING INVENTORY .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 APPARATUS INVENTORY .............................................................................................................................. 9 3.0 MEASURING FUTURE CAPITAL FACILITY NEEDS ....................................................................................... 14 3.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES .................................................................................................................... 14 4.0 FORECAST OF FUTURE FACILITY NEEDS, 2024-2029 ................................................................................. 22 4.1 APPARATUS FACILITY NEEDS ...................................................................................................................... 22 4.2 STATION FACILITY NEEDS............................................................................................................................ 23 4.3 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND CAPACITIES OF EXPANDED OR NEW CAPITAL FACILITIES .............................. 24 5.0 CAPITAL FACILITIES REVENUE ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 26 5.1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................. 26 5.2 FUNDING THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ..................................................................................................... 26 5.3 ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................................................................................................ 26 5.4 FIRE IMPACT FEES ....................................................................................................................................... 27 5.5 OPERATING TRANSFERS ............................................................................................................................. 28 5.6 SIX-YEAR COST AND REVENUE COMPARISON............................................................................................. 28 5.7 POLICY OPTIONS AND OTHER FUNDING SOURCES ..................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX A: AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE ............................................................................................................. 29 APPENDIX B: MAJOR REPAIR AND REHABILITATION FOR STATIONS..................................................................... 30 APPENDIX C: FIRE STATION 11 DRIVE TIME (AID UNIT) ............................................................................................ 32 APPENDIX D: FIRE STATION 12-13 DRIVE TIME (LADDERS) ....................................................................................... 33 APPENDIX E: FIRE STATION 16/WAREHOUSE PRELIMINARY LAYOUT ....................................................................... 34 Back to Top Table of Exhibits Exhibit 1-1. Service Area and Station Locations ............................................................................................ 6 Exhibit 1-2. Service Area Population and Projected Growth ......................................................................... 7 Exhibit 2-1. Fire Station Inventory ................................................................................................................. 8 Exhibit 2-2. Engines in RRFA Fleet ................................................................................................................. 9 Exhibit 2-3. Ariel Ladder Inventory .............................................................................................................. 10 Exhibit 2-4. Aid Units in RRFA Fleet ............................................................................................................. 10 Exhibit 2-5. Hazardous Materials Vehicle in RRFA Fleet ............................................................................. 10 Exhibit 2-6. Brush Trucks in RRFA Fleet ....................................................................................................... 10 Exhibit 2-7. Command Vehicles in RRFA Fleet .............................................................................................. 11 Exhibit 2-8. Dive Apparatus in RRFA Fleet .................................................................................................... 11 Exhibit 2-9. Service Vehicles in RRFA Fleet ................................................................................................... 11 Exhibit 2-10. Staff Vehicles in RRFA Fleet ..................................................................................................... 12 Exhibit 2-11. Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet ................................................................................................... 12 Exhibit 2-12. Small Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet ........................................................................................ 13 Exhibit 2-13. Other Apparatus/Equipment in RRFA Fleet ........................................................................... 13 Exhibit 3-1. Total Cost of Response by Land Use Category ......................................................................... 16 Exhibit 3-2. Response Time Level of Service Standards .............................................................................. 17 Exhibit 3-3. 2022 Response Time Level of Service Standards for Fire/Other ............................................... 17 Exhibit 3-4. 2022 Response Time Level of Service Standards for EMS......................................................... 17 Exhibit 3-5. City of Renton 2018 PC Rating ................................................................................................. 18 Exhibit 3-6. Fire Station 11 Ladder with 2.5 Road Mile Radius ................................................................... 19 Exhibit 3-7. Highlighted City of Renton Planned Development ................................................................... 20 Exhibit 4-1. Capital Costs for Apparatus, 2024-2029................................................................................... 22 Exhibit 4-2. Capital Facility Costs for Stations, 2024-2029 .......................................................................... 23 Exhibit 4-3. Fire Station 16 .......................................................................................................................... 24 Exhibit 5-1. Projected Dedicated Capital Revenues and Costs .................................................................... 28 Exhibit 5-2. Estimated Capital Facilities Revenues and Costs, YOE ............................................................. 28 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 4 1.0 Introduction 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is to identify capital facility needs necessary for the Renton Regional Fire Authority (RRFA) to achieve and maintain adopted standards for levels of service concurrent with, or prior to, the impacts of expected development and population growth over the next six years (2024-2029) and is consistent with the land use and transportation elements of the City of Renton (City) and King County comprehensive plans. This CFP also identifies sound fiscal policies and funding resources for implementation. 1.2 CAPITAL PLANNING REQUIREMENTS The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that a county’s or city’s CFP should consist of: a) an inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities; b) a forecast of the future needs for capital facilities; c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; d) a six-year plan to finance capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identified sources of public money for such purposes; and e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of existing needs (RCW 36.70a.070(3)). The GMA requires that all capital facilities have “probable funding” to pay for capital facility needs and that jurisdictions have capital facilities in place and readily available when new development comes in or must be of sufficient capacity when the population grows. The City prepares a CFP element as part of its comprehensive plan. In accordance with the Interlocal Agreement (ILA) in place between the City and the RRFA, the City will incorporate the RRFA’s six-year plan for fire and emergency services facilities into its comprehensive plan CFP. That allows the City to impose an impact fee. Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities addressed by a CFP element of a comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the GMA (RCW 82.02.050 (4)). Levels of service (LOS) are established in the CFP and represent quantifiable measures of capacity. They are minimum standards established by the RRFA to provide capital facilities and services to the RRFA service area at a certain level of quality and within the financial capacity of the RRFA. As the population grows, it is expected that demands for fire and emergency response services will also grow. Additional facilities will be necessary to meet this growing demand for service. LOS standards are influenced by local citizens, elected, and appointed officials, national and state standards, mandates, and other considerations, such as available funding. Growth, LOS standards, and a funded capital improvement program are to be in balance. In the case where the LOS cannot be met by a service or facility, the jurisdiction could do one of the Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 5 following: 1) add proposed facilities within funding resources, 2) reduce demand through demand management strategies, 3) lower LOS standards, 4) phase growth, or 5) change the land use plan. 1.3 DEFINITION OF CAPITAL FACILITIES The CFP addresses public facilities necessary for providing fire and emergency response services. Capital facilities generally have a long useful life and include RRFA-owned and/or -operated buildings, land, equipment, and apparatus. Capital facilities planning does not cover regular operation and maintenance, but it does include major repair, rehabilitation, or reconstruction of facilities. The RRFA considers capital assets to be assets of more than $5,000 in value and an estimated useful life of more than one year. 1.4 PRINCIPLES GUIDING CAPITAL INVESTMENTS There are two main guiding elements behind capital facilities planning: RRFA standard operating procedures (SOP) that define fiscal policies and the GMA. RRFA SOP 2315 “Reserve Funds” and SOP 2317 “Long-Term Planning” address the RRFA’s policies regarding capital reserves and investments. The CFP supports RRFA in making strategic capital investments that support this effort. RRFA intends to use the CFP as: a tool for budgeting; the basis for capital spending, giving a degree of assurance about how public money will be spent; and a useful guidance document for leadership and staff. Toward that end, RRFA has developed and used the following guidelines to evaluate projects before adding them to the CFP: Growth-related project costs should be timed to match with available remitted fire impact fee revenues. Project costs that are not growth-related should be timed to match with revenues available through operating transfers. Projects should be spaced to allow for progress on RRFA’s other financial goals, especially maintaining its capital and operating reserves. 1.5 RRFA HISTORY AND GOVERNANCE RRFA is a special purpose district that provides fire and medical emergency response services within the City and King County Fire District 25 (KCFD25). The RRFA was established on July 1, 2016, after voters residing within KCFD25 and the City approved Proposition 1. This legislation Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 6 formed the regional fire authority and authorized a fire benefit charge. Prior to the creation of the RRFA, service in the City was provided by Renton Fire & Emergency Services (RF&ES) and both KCFD25 and King County Fire District 40 (KCFD40) contracted for services with the City. Creation of the RRFA consolidated fire protection for the City and KCFD25 under a single special local government authority. The contract for fire protection with KCFD40 remained in place and transferred to RRFA and was renewed in 2022 for an additional twenty years. Accordingly, KCFD40 is treated as part of the RRFA entity for the purposes of this CFP. 1.6 SERVICE AREA RRFA is located at the south end of Lake Washington, between Seattle and Tacoma. According to King County GIS data, the RRFA’s total response area is 37 square miles, including the City of Renton and KCFD25 (27 square miles) and the KCFD40 and Lake Youngs area (10 square miles). KCFD25 is located in the area east of the City and north of State Route 169 known as the East Renton Highlands. KCFD40 and Lake Youngs are located in the area east of the City and south of State Route 169 known as Fairwood. The RRFA service area is bordered by unincorporated areas of King County, as well as the cities of Kent, Tukwila, and Newcastle, with the City of Seattle just a few miles northwest. Exhibit 1-1 presents a map of the RRFA service area and station locations. Exhibit 1-1. Service Area and Station Locations Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 7 1.7 CURRENT CONDITIONS AND PROJECTED GROWTH Renton is the fourth largest city in King County, covering 23.54 square miles and having an estimated 2022 population of 107,900. The City includes residential neighborhoods, a strong industrial base, and a growing commercial/office sector. The City’s downtown and northern manufacturing area were designated as a regional growth center by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) in 1995. The northern part of the regional growth center borders Lake Washington and emphasizes mixed use and regional employment, including the Boeing Company’s Renton Plant and The Landing, a significant recent retail and residential development. The southern part of the regional growth center includes the downtown core and adjacent residential area. Downtown Renton has seen investment in recent years, including the Renton Pavilion Event Center and Piazza Park, the Renton Transit Center, the IKEA Performing Arts Center, Top Golf, the Hyatt, and Southport. The City also contains commercial corridors, multi-family nodes, and extensive single-family neighborhoods. KCFD25 and KCFD40 mostly contain residential areas located in King County outside of Renton city limits. Population projections for Renton, KCFD25, and KCFD40 for the years 2023-2029 are presented in Exhibit 1-2.1 The City is expected to grow by 6,053 residents, 86% of the total population growth forecasted for the RRFA service area. Exhibit 1-2. Service Area Population and Projected Growth Description 2022 Projected Growth 2023-2029 City of Renton 107,900 6,053 KCFD25 7,947 87 KCFD40 22,148 917 Total Service Area 137,995 7,057 City of Renton Share of Population Growth 86% 1 Source: Projections provided by the City of Renton. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 8 2.0 Inventory of Existing RRFA Capital Facilities This section provides a current inventory of capital facilities that are either owned or operated by RRFA, including both stations and apparatus. 2.1 BUILDING INVENTORY Exhibit 1-1 in Section 1 maps the locations and ownership of the seven fire stations operated by RRFA. Exhibit 2-1 provides station locations and square footage operated by RRFA. Exhibit 2-1. Fire Station Inventory Station Address Building Square Footage Operated by RRFA Fire Station 112 211 Mill Ave S, Renton, WA 98057 20,550 Fire Station 12 (Ex EOC) 3 1209 Kirkland Ave NE, Renton, WA 98056 14,800 Fire Station 13 18002 108th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 20,521 Fire Station 13 Shop 18002 108th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98055 6,000 Fire Station 14 1900 Lind Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057 13,659 Fire Station 14 Tower 1900 Lind Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057 3,658 Fire Station 15 1404 N 30th St., Renton, WA 98056 7,497 Fire Station 16 12923 156th Ave SE, Renton, WA 98059 7,732 Fire Station 174 14810 Petrovitsky Rd SE, Renton, WA 98058 6,836 2 Fire Station 11 is owned by the City of Renton and leased to RRFA. The building square footage excludes the area leased by KC Medics. 3 Fire Station 12 is owned by the City of Renton and leased to the RRFA. The building square footage excludes the portion of the building that is utilized by City of Renton Emergency Management. 4 Fire Station 17 is owned by Fire District 40 and used by RRFA through service contract. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 9 2.2 APPARATUS INVENTORY The RRFA maintains a wide variety of highly specialized apparatus in order to fulfill its mission to protect the community it serves. Inventories of RRFA engines, ladders, aid units, hazardous materials vehicles, brush trucks, command vehicles, dive apparatus, service vehicles, staff vehicles, utility vehicles, small utility vehicles, and other apparatus/equipment are shown in Exhibits 2-2 through 2-13. Exhibit 2-2. Engines in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/ Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F074 E413 Station 13 1999 E-One Cyclone II not scheduled $0 F085 E414 Station 14 2005 E-One Cyclone II 2025 $1,103,258 F093 E412 Station 12 2008 E-One Cyclone II 2025 $1,103,258 F114 E313 Station 13 2015 E-One Cyclone II 2031 $1,317,348 F115 E314 Station 14 2015 E-One Cyclone II 2031 $1,317,348 F123 E311 Station 11 2017 E-One Cyclone II 2033 $1,397,574 F124 E312 Station 12 2017 E-One Cyclone II 2033 $1,397,574 F137 E316 Station 16 2019 E-One Cyclone II 2035 $1,482,687 F148 E313 Station 13 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2038 $1,620,172 F149 E314 Station 14 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2038 $1,620,172 F2515 E316 Station 16 2003 E-One Cyclone II 2025 $1,103,258 F441 E417 Station 17 2022 Pierce Enforcer 2038 $1,620,172 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 10 Exhibit 2-3. Ariel Ladder Inventory Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F105 L311 Station 11 2011 E-One Aerial 2029 $2,591,449 F135 L311 Station 11 2019 E-One Cyclone 2037 $3,282,770 Exhibit 2-4. Aid Units in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F110 A313 Station 13 2014 INTE Northstar 2025 $421,371 F111 A312 Station 12 2014 INTE Northstar 2025 $421,371 F138 A311 Station 11 2020 Ford F-450 2032 $518,233 F153 A313 Station 13 2022 Ford F-450 2034 $549,793 F154 A312 Station 12 2022 Ford F-450 2034 $549,793 F440 A317 Station 17 2022 Ford F-450 2034 $549,793 Exhibit 2-5. Hazardous Materials Vehicle in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F120 HM314 Station 14 2017 E-One Freightliner 2037 $826,618 Exhibit 2-6. Brush Trucks in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/ Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F091 BR317 Station 17 2008 Ford F-550 2024 $354,413 F155 BR316 Station 16 2022 Ford F-550 2037 $520,467 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 11 Exhibit 2-7. Command Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F109 B413 Station 13 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe 2023 $111,202 F119 B312 Station 12 2016 Chevrolet Silverado 2024 $114,538 F121 C312 Station 13 2017 Chevrolet Tahoe 2027 $125,159 F122 C314 Station 13 2017 Ford Explorer 2027 $125,159 F125 B313 Station 13 2018 Chevrolet Silverado 2028 $128,914 F134 C313 Station 13 2020 Ford Explorer 2030 $136,764 F139 C311 Station 13 2020 Ford Explorer 2030 $136,764 F156 TBD Station 11 2023 Chevrolet Silverado 2033 $149,446 F158 TBD Station 12 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 2500 2034 $153,930 Exhibit 2-8. Dive Apparatus in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F129 DIV312 Station 12 2018 Ram 5500 2039 $443,087 Exhibit 2-9. Service Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F136 CAR312 EMS 2019 Ford F-150 Pursuit 2029 $110,086 F434 CAR52 EMS 2004 Chevrolet Tahoe 2023 $92,195 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 12 Exhibit 2-10. Staff Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F096A N/A OFM 2009 Ford Escape 2024 $39,035 F104 N/A EMS 2012 Ford Escape 2027 $42,655 F116 N/A Administration 2016 Ford Police Utility 2030 $46,610 F117 N/A OFM 2015 Ford C-Max 2030 $46,610 F126 N/A OFM 2018 Ford Escape 2033 $50,932 F127 N/A OFM 2018 Ford Escape 2033 $50,932 F128 N/A OFM 2018 Ford Escape 2033 $50,932 F130 N/A OFM 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 F143 N/A OFM 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 F144 N/A OFM 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 F145 N/A Support Services 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 F146 N/A Support Services 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 F147 N/A Support Services 2020 Ford Escape 2035 $54,033 Exhibit 2-11. Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F112 N/A SKCFTC 2015 Ford F-250 2030 $85,978 F113 N/A OFM 2015 Dodge Promaster 2030 $85,978 F132 N/A Support Services 2019 Ford F-250 2034 $96,769 F133 N/A Support Services 2019 Ford F-250 2034 $96,769 F140 N/A Administration 2020 Chevrolet Express 2500 2035 $99,672 F151 N/A SKCFTC 2021 Ford F-150 2036 $102,662 F152 N/A SKCFTC 2021 Ford F-150 2036 $102,662 F159 N/A Support Services 2024 Chevrolet Silverado 2039 $112,182 F436 N/A Support Services 2005 Chevrolet Silverado 2023 $69,908 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 13 Exhibit 2-12. Small Utility Vehicles in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F131 N/A Station 14 2020 Ford Transit Connect 2035 $60,022 F141 N/A Station 13 2020 Nissan NV200 S 2035 $60,022 F142 N/A Station 13 2020 Nissan NV200 S 2035 $60,022 Exhibit 2-13. Other Apparatus/Equipment in RRFA Fleet Vehicle Number Call Sign Station/Division Assignment Year Make Model Replacement Year Est. Cost in Year of Replacement F092 N/A N/A 2007 Cargo Trailer 22Ft not scheduled $0 F094 N/A N/A 2008 Eagle Utility not scheduled $0 F101 N/A N/A 2008 Club Inteltrak not scheduled $0 F103 N/A N/A 2008 PLRS Spirit 2025 $100,394 F118 N/A N/A 2016 EZLD Trailer 2026 $17,727 F150 N/A N/A 2005 CGMT Trailblazer 2025 $17,210 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 14 3.0 Measuring Future Capital Facility Needs The GMA was enacted to provide local oversight of community growth with the intent for local governments such as counties, cities, and towns to monitor and mitigate the impacts of growth. GMA Goal 1 promotes placing growth in urban areas where there are public facilities and services, while GMA Goal 12 promotes adequate facilities and services to support development: (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards (RCW 36.70A.020(12)). Concurrency for transportation infrastructure is mandated by the GMA, and local agencies were given the authority to establish concurrency guidelines for other public needs such as water, sewer, and fire services: Purpose. The purpose of concurrency is to assure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development are adequate to serve that development at the time it is available for occupancy and use, without decreasing service levels below locally established minimum standards. Concurrency describes the situation in which adequate facilities are available when the impacts of development occur, or within a specified time thereafter. Concurrency ensures consistency in land use approval and the development of adequate public facilities as plans are implemented, and it prevents development that is inconsistent with the public facilities necessary to support the development. With respect to facilities other than transportation facilities, counties and cities may fashion their own regulatory responses and are not limited to imposing moratoria on development during periods when concurrency is not maintained (WAC 365-196-840). The RRFA CFP identifies the need for $25.5M in capital investments as shown in Exhibits 4-1 and 4-2, to maintain fire service concurrency through the year 2029. 3.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE MEASURES RRFA measures LOS from three different perspectives. The first concerns the cost of facilities for Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 15 incident response per unit of development. The second perspective concerns turnout and response times in accordance with established policy. The third perspective concerns the Protection Class (PC) rating for each of the areas served (the City of Renton, KCFD25, and KDFD40). Each of these LOS measures are described below. 3.1.1 Cost of Facilities for Incident Response per Unit of Development In 2023, RRFA conducted a rate study for fire impact fees. That study presents a methodology for quantifying the need for fire and EMS stations and apparatus to serve new growth, for the purpose of collecting fire impact fees. The level of service standard is the 2022 ratio of apparatus and stations to EMS and fire/other incidents. More specifically, the rate study calculates the annualized facility value per incident as well as the number of incidents produced by different kinds of development. This determines the total cost of facilities for incident response needed per unit of development. This standard is used to measure the systemwide capacity of facilities to support incident response throughout the RRFA service area. Full documentation of the methodology is available in the rate study. A brief summary follows. For apparatus, including engines and other response vehicles, the ratio of apparatus to incidents as of 2022 was selected as an acceptable LOS standard. As growth occurs, more incidents will occur, and therefore more apparatus will be needed to maintain this standard. It is anticipated that much of the growth in the RRFA service area will come in the form of infill development and increased density within the City. As the growth occurs, the RRFA intends to add additional apparatus units to address the anticipated increase in multi-story housing (ladder) and emergency medical calls for service (aid unit). For fire stations, the rate study measures LOS using the ratio of station square footage to incidents. However, a deduction to the station square footage is made to account for unused beds that could accommodate additional fire and emergency response staff. As stated above, it is anticipated that much of the growth in the RRFA service area will come in the form of infill development and increased density within the City. As this growth occurs, the RRFA intends to utilize excess bed capacity in current stations to increase its capacity for emergency response at existing stations. On the next page, Exhibit 3-1 shows the cost of response per unit of development (dwelling unit, square foot, room, or student), by land use category, as calculated in the 2023 RRFA Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees. These represent the total amount of facility investment the RRFA would need to make to maintain the current level of service as growth occurs within the service area, but not the actual fire impact fee to be charged. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 16 Exhibit 3-1. Total Cost of Response by Land Use Category Land Use Type Unit of Development Total Cost of Response to EMS, Fire, & Other Incidents, Per Unit of Development Single-Family Residential d.u. $880.99 Multi-Family Residential d.u. $1,209.66 Hotel/Motel/Resort room $722.82 Medical Care Facility bed $2,196.29 Office sq. ft. $0.29 Medical/Dental Office sq. ft. $1.28 Retail sq. ft. $1.38 Leisure Facilities sq. ft. $0.89 Restaurant/Lounge sq. ft. $3.00 Industrial/Manufacturing sq. ft. $0.10 Church/Non-Profit sq. ft. $0.50 Education student $58.50 Special Public Facilities sq. ft. $0.27 3.1.2 Turnout and Response Time Standards Traffic and geographic barriers currently present challenges to providing adequate response time in some areas. For this reason, RRFA also has turnout and response time standards for measuring performance across the entire service area and by individual station. Turnout and response time standards are documented in SOP 4101 “Response Guidelines”. First, this policy addresses turnout times, or the interval that begins when audible or visual notification is received by firefighters from the 911 center and ends at the beginning point of travel time. SOP 4101 states: “Turnout time for emergent responses shall be expedient and no longer than one hundred twenty seconds.” Second, this policy addresses response times, or the interval that begins with notification and ends with the time the unit arrives on scene. SOP 4101 states: “The organization aspires in a non-disaster situation, under current conditions of funding, staffing, and equipment, to respond to 90% of the emergency service calls within 7 minutes and 30 seconds from the time of dispatch.” These standards are summarized in Exhibit 3-2. 5 Source: RRFA Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees, 2023 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 17 Exhibit 3-2. Response Time Level of Service Standards Service Standard Response Time Meet Response Time Goal Turnout time for emergency response 120 seconds 100% First unit arrival 7 minutes and 30 seconds from the time of dispatch 90% Measuring response time helps RRFA to identify where additional capacity may be necessary. It also helps to identify where current conditions such as station design, local traffic, land use, or geographic barriers are presenting challenges to responding to incidents in a timely manner. For example, Fire Stations 13 and 16 are multi-story buildings that require response crews to travel from a second story to the main story in order to respond, thus increasing their turnout time compared to a single-story station. Similarly, the increased density of multi-family housing and commercial development outside of the Fire Station 11 response area reduces the probability of meeting the response standard and impacts response time level of service for that property type. The response time level of service standards for 2022 are displayed in Exhibit 3-3 and 3-4. Exhibit 3-3. 2022 Response Time Level of Service Standards for Fire/Other In/Out of Jurisdiction Turnout time under 120 seconds Response time under 7.5m In Jurisdiction 50.66% 81.87% Out of Jurisdiction 56.22% 32.33% Exhibit 3-4. 2022 Response Time Level of Service Standards for EMS In/Out of Jurisdiction Turnout time under 120 seconds Response time under 7.5m In Jurisdiction 74.26% 94.06% Out of Jurisdiction 72.02% 72.13% Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 18 3.1.3 Washington Surveying Rating Bureau Protection Class A Washington Surveying Rating Bureau (WSRB) protection class (PC) is a score from 1 to 10 that represents the community-provided fire protection capabilities available at a specific property. A PC of 1 indicates exemplary fire protection capabilities are available; a PC of 10 indicates the fire protection capabilities, if any, are not sufficient to receive credit for insurance. Each community in Washington state has a PC, which is used as a starting point to determine the PC of individual properties. In 2018, the City’sPCwas upgraded from a Class 3 to a Class 2.6 This put the RRFA’s fire protection of the City in the top 5% in the country and top 1% in the state. In July of 2022, the City of Seattle became the first and only fire department in the state to achieve a Class 1 PC. Exhibit 3-5. City of Renton 2018 PC Rating The improvements made to fire and life safety throughout Renton over the past several years have led to this outstanding upgrade in PC for the Renton community. Because a community’s PC is one of the key factors in insurance premium determination, not only does this upgrade represent exceptional fire and life safety protection, but Renton property owners also have an even greater opportunity to realize insurance premium savings. KCFD25 and KCFD40 both maintain a PC of Class 3. A community's PC rating is evaluated using the following criteria: Fire department (40%), including distribution of stations, staffing levels, equipment, and personnel training. Water supply (35%), including water flow capacity, fire hydrant location, and maintenance. Emergency communications system (9%), including dispatching system, staffing, and training. Fire safety control (16%), including fire code and building code enforcement, fire investigations, and public fire education programs. 6 Source: Country Wide PC Ratings were obtained in 2019 from www.isomitigation.com/ppc/program-works/facts-and-figures-about-ppc-codes- around-the-country/. State Wide PC Ratings were published in the WSRB Protection Class Report for Renton, dated October 5, 2018. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 19 Because the PC criteria that most affect the overall rating are the fire operations and deployment of resources for fire protection, the RRFA must maintain the fire protection apparatus, staffing, and deployment that supports its current PC rating as growth occurs. For example, WSRB requires a ladder to be positioned within 2.5 road miles of a given structure. The RRFA maintains a single ladder located at Fire Station 11 in downtown Renton. Exhibit 3-6 shows the 2.5 road mile radius of Fire Station 11 in comparison to the projected new development within the City. A second ladder is required to address the growth in these areas. Exhibit 3-6. Fire Station 11 Ladder with 2.5 Road Mile Radius Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 20 Some of the City-projecteddevelopments that will require a ladder response are shown in Exhibit 3-7 below.7 Exhibit 3-7. Highlighted City of Renton Planned Development 7 Source: City of Renton: Renton Highlighted Development (arcgis.com)accessed 08/04/2023. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 21 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 22 4.0 Forecast of Future Facility Needs, 2024-2029 The following is a summary of capital facility needs for the period of 2024-2029. 4.1 APPARATUS FACILITY NEEDS Over the next six years, RRFA will need to replace 17 apparatus and add 2 additional apparatus to its fleet. The inventory of apparatus in Section 2.2 provides the year of replacement for all apparatus in the current fleet. Exhibit 4-1 summarizes scheduled apparatus replacements and total costs through the year 2029. It also includes the cost of expansions to the RRFA vehicle fleet needed to serve new growth.8 Exhibit 4-1. Capital Costs for Apparatus, 2024-2029 Project Description Quantity Average Unit Cost Total Cost in Year of Replacement Percentage Related to City of Renton Growth Impact Fee Eligible Costs Apparatus Replacements Engine 3 $1,103,258 $3,826,688 0% $0 Ladder 1 $2,591,449 $2,591,449 0% $0 Aid Unit 2 $421,371 $842,741 0% $0 HazMat Vehicle 0 N/A $0 0% $0 Brush Truck 1 $354,413 $354,413 0% $0 Command Vehicle 4 $123,442 $493,769 0% $0 Dive Apparatus 0 N/A $0 0% $0 Service Vehicle 1 $110,086 $110,086 0% $0 Staff Vehicle 2 $40,845 $81,689 0% $0 Utility Vehicle 0 N/A $0 0% $0 Sm. Utility Vehicle 0 N/A $0 0% $0 Other Apparatus/Equipment 3 N/A $135,332 0% $0 Apparatus Fleet Expansions Ladder 1 $2,591,449 $2,591,449 86% $2,222,764 Aid Unit 1 $421,371 $421,371 86% $361,422 Apparatus Total $7,622,299 $2,584,186 8 See the RRFA Rate Study for Fire Impact Fees (2023) for the methodology used to determine the proportion of growth-related apparatus needs based on population. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 23 4.2 STATION FACILITY NEEDS RRFA has three categories of station facility costs: debt servicing for existing stations, new station construction, and renovations to address operational needs. The costs related to these needs are summarized in Exhibit 4-2 and described in more detail below. Exhibit 4-2. Capital Facility Costs for Stations, 2024-2029 Project Description Total Cost Percentage Related to City of Renton Growth Impact Fee Eligible Costs Fire Station Debt Servicing Fire Station 16/Maintenance $15,064,544 18% $2,711,618 Fire Station Improvements for Operational Needs Fire Station 11 Facility Improvements $571,225 0% $0 Fire Station 12 Facility Improvements $883,022 0% $0 Fire Station 13 Facility Improvements $852,489 0% $0 Fire Station 13 Shop Facility Improvements $0 0% $0 Fire Station 14 Facility Improvements $320,319 0% $0 Fire Station 14 Tower Facility Improvements $0 0% $0 Fire Station 15 Facility Improvements $0 0% $0 Fire Station 16 Facility Improvements $190,542 0% $0 Fire Station 17 Facility Improvements $1,069 0% $0 Total Fire Station Costs $17,883,211 $2,711,618 4.2.1 Debt Servicing RRFA intends to relocate Fire Station 16 and build a new maintenance repair facility within the City borders to address the anticipated growth in the area. The percent attributed to City growth is 18%. Construction costs have not yet been developed; however, TCA has provided an estimate of $20M for the project. The RRFA currently has no debt but does intend to issue Limited Tax General Obligation (LTGO) bonds in late 2023 and early 2024 for the financing of the new Fire Station 16 and maintenance facility in the amount of approximately $20M. The debt service in Exhibit 4-2 represents anticipated bond payments for the years 2024-2029. See Appendix A for an estimated amortization table. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 24 4.2.2 New Facility Needs RRFA has identified the need to replace Fire Station 16 in the East Plateau neighborhood on the northeast side of Renton. The existing facility was built in 1974 and is approaching 50 years old and does not accommodate the modern needs of the fire service. Building a new station will increase capacity to serve expected growth in this area of Renton for the next 50 years. In addition, the RRFA intends to build a new maintenance facility to provide the space necessary to conduct apparatus service and repair as we continue to expand our fleet. RRFA’s assessment of facilityneeds to meet our current level of service standardshas determined that 82% of this new station and maintenance facility will address existing deficiencies while 18% will expand capacity to serve future growth. Construction of the new Fire Station 16 is anticipated to begin in 2024. The total estimated cost of this station and additional apparatus repair facility, including land acquisition, is $20,000,000. Exhibit 4-3. Fire Station 16 4.2.3 Capital Projects Associated with Station Operational Needs The RRFA anticipates several improvement projects at existing fire stations necessary to address operationalneedsand maintain concurrency of fire services through 2029. These improvements include major repair andrehabilitation and do not including regularoperations and maintenance. They are summarized in Exhibit 4-2 above and detailed in Appendix B. 4.3 PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND CAPACITIES OF EXPANDED OR NEW CAPITAL FACILITIES 4.3.1 Apparatus The RRFA has identified the need to add one aid unit and one ladder to serve the new growth within the City. Appendix C highlights the areas covered by the addition of an aid unit at Fire Station 11, much of which includes new development parcels. Appendix D highlights the areas Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 25 covered by adding an additional ladder and locating one ladder at Fire Station 12 and one at Fire Station 13. 4.3.2 Station The new Fire Station 16 and maintenance facility will be located at 15815 SE 128th St in Renton. The existing Fire Station 16 is 7,732 square feet (SF) and is situated on a 58,806 SF parcel of land. Due to the limited size of the current lot, the maximum building area allowed is 12,800 SF which will not accommodate a station intended to serve growth over the next 50 years, the average longevity of a fire station. In addition, the current maintenance facility located at Fire Station 13 is at maximum capacity and cannot accommodate servicing any additions to the RRFA fleet. An additional maintenance facility is needed. The new Fire Station 16 will be located on a 150,200 SF parcel of land and that will allow up to 25,100 SF of building space. A single-story station of approximately 15,150 will accommodate eight beds and three bays and a five-bay maintenance facility are planned for the new parcel. See Appendix E for a preliminary layout of the parcel. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 26 5.0 Capital Facilities Revenue Analysis 5.1 OVERVIEW This CFP revenue analysis supports the financing for providing facilities and services, as required by RCW 36.70A.070(3)(d). Revenue estimates, using assumptions based on historical trends, are used to represent realistic expectations for revenue that may be available for capital funding. This revenue analysis provides an approximate, and not exact, projection of future revenue sources. The numbers projected in this analysis are for planning purposes and cannot account for sensitivities such as local, state, and federal policy, economic trends, and other factors. This analysis may not align with RRFA’s annual budget because it is based on multi-year projections of revenue, while the annual budget presents precise estimates of available revenue for spending in a specific fiscal year. 5.2 FUNDING THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Estimated future revenues are projected for the years 2024-2029. The revenue analysis is categorized according to: Dedicated Capital Revenues. Dedicated revenues are required to be used for certain types of capital spending, outlined by the law. The dedicated capital revenues for RRFA include fire impact fees remitted to RRFA by the City. Operating Transfers. Operating transfers-in are those revenue sources that are transferred in from the operating fund. Although these are not dedicated sources to be relied on for capital funding, the RRFA endeavors to make regular operating transfers-in to its reserves on a level basis each year. These transfers are not specifically dedicated to capital spending and could be used elsewhere. LTGO Bonds. Financing bonds that do not require voter approval or include the levying of an additional tax to repay them. Other Funding Sources. The RRFA continuously explores external sources available to fund capital projects such as grant opportunities. 5.3 ASSUMPTIONS The RRFA revenue analysis is based on the following assumptions: Analysis Boundary. The analysis includes the current RRFA boundary as shown in Exhibit 1-1. Growth. Growth targets were provided by the City staff and reflect projections as of August 2023. Property Tax. This analysis assumes that the property tax levy rate will reset to Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 27 $1 per thousand in 2024 with the successful passing of Proposition 1 in August of 2023. Property tax revenues will increase at an annual rate of 1% going forward, with the assessed value and new construction growing according to the July 2023 King County Economic and Revenue Forecast – Office of Economic and Financial Analysis. Fire Benefit Charge. In 2021, the voters approved a ten-year renewal of the fire benefit charge with a vote of nearly 82% in favor of the proposition. By law, the fire benefit charge may be used for up to 60% of the RRFA operating budget. In 2023, the fire benefit makes up approximately 35% of the RRFA’s total budget. With the passing of Proposition 1 (see above), the RRFA intends to lower the fire benefit charge by as much as 50% and is estimating that the benefit charge will account for approximately 17% of the 2024 operating budget. Fire Impact Fees. This analysis assumes the City will adopt the 2024 fire impact fees proposed by the RRFA and will remit fees collected to the RRFA as outlined in the interlocal agreement between the City and the RRFA. Projected residential and commercial impact fee revenues are based on residential and nonresidential growth projections provided by City staff. Fire District 40 Service Contract. RRFA and KCFD40 entered into a twenty-year agreement in 2022 and maintains a collaborative relationship with the governance board for the district. This analysis assumes that from 2024 forward, the service contract grows annually at a rate relative to the costs of operating the RRFA. EMS Levy. This analysis assumes revenues from the EMS levy continue to increase at an annual growth rate of 3%. Permits and Fees. This analysis assumes revenues from miscellaneous permits and fees will remain at now current rates. EMS Services. This analysis assumes revenues from EMS services will increase at a rate of 5% per year and Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT) revenues will remain level. GEMT funding is at the discretion of the federal government and the program could be modified or cancelled at any time. 5.4 FIRE IMPACT FEES The City has collected fire impact fees since 2011. In 2023, the debt service on Fire Station 13 was paid in full and the City now remits fire impact fees to the RRFA on a monthly basis. Impact fees collected through 2023 will be used for capital facility needs identified in the 2017 RRFA CFP. Fees collected beginning in 2024 will be used for capital facility needs identified in this CFP. The RRFA projects fire impact fees of $5,074,209 for the years 2024 through 2029. Exhibit 5-1 compares the projected fire impact fee revenue to the projected growth-related project costs, as presented in Exhibit 4-1 and Exhibit 4-2. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 28 Exhibit 5-1. Projected Dedicated Capital Revenues and Costs Dedicated Revenues and Project Costs 2024-2029 Total Revenues and Costs Fire Impact Fee Revenues (remitted) $5,074,209 Planned Growth-Related Project Costs $5,295,804 Estimated Dedicated Funding Surplus/(Deficit) ($221,594) 5.5 OPERATING TRANSFERS The projected revenues available for operating transfers-in over the planning period of 2024-2029 is $33,200,000. RRFA’s funding streams for these transfers-in and for capital facilities costs include revenues from its property tax, fire benefit charge, KCFD40 service contract, EMS levy, LTGO bonds, and miscellaneous permits and fees. 5.6 SIX-YEAR COST AND REVENUE COMPARISON This six-year comparison looks at RRFA’s total revenues and planned project costs for the six-year planning horizon of 2024-2029 in order to understand the difference between future dedicated capital costs and potential future revenues. Capital costs are presented as year of expenditure (YOE) and include growth-related capital facility and apparatus replacement costs. Exhibit 5-2 summarizes projected capital facilities revenues and costs.9 Exhibit 5-2. Estimated Capital Facilities Revenues and Costs, YOE Capital Facilities Revenues and Costs 2024-2029 Growth-Related Capital Costs $5,295,804 Capital Replacement and Project Costs, not Growth-Related $22,492,690 Total Costs $27,788,494 Impact Fee Revenue $5,074,209 Operating Transfer Potential Revenue $33,200,000 Estimated Funding Surplus/(Deficit) $10,485,716 5.7 POLICY OPTIONS AND OTHER FUNDING SOURCES One additional funding source option is: Unlimited Tax General Obligation (UTGO) Bonds: Financing bonds that require voter approval and include the levying of an additional tax to repay them. 9 Source: Renton RFA, 2023. Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 29 Appendix A: Amortization Schedule Debt Servicing Amortization Schedule Payment: Every 6 Months Term: 10 Years Amount: $20,000,000 Interest Rate: 4.50% Year Beginning Balance Interest Principal Ending Balance Payment Year 1. Year #1 $20,000,000.00 $454,239.90 $801,138.78 $19,198,861.22 $1,255,378.68 2024 2. Year #1 $19,198,861.22 $436,044.44 $819,334.24 $18,379,526.97 $1,255,378.68 2024 3. Year #2 $18,379,526.97 $417,435.73 $837,942.96 $17,541,584.01 $1,255,378.69 2025 4. Year #2 $17,541,584.01 $398,404.37 $856,974.32 $16,684,609.70 $1,255,378.69 2025 5. Year #3 $16,684,609.70 $378,940.77 $876,437.91 $15,808,171.79 $1,255,378.68 2026 6. Year #3 $15,808,171.79 $359,035.12 $896,343.57 $14,911,828.22 $1,255,378.69 2026 7. Year #4 $14,911,828.22 $338,677.37 $916,701.32 $13,995,126.90 $1,255,378.69 2027 8. Year #4 $13,995,126.90 $317,857.25 $937,521.43 $13,057,605.47 $1,255,378.68 2027 9. Year #5 $13,057,605.47 $296,564.27 $958,814.41 $12,098,791.06 $1,255,378.68 2028 10. Year #5 $12,098,791.06 $274,787.68 $980,591.00 $11,118,200.05 $1,255,378.68 2028 11. Year #6 $11,118,200.05 $252,516.51 $1,002,862.18 $10,115,337.87 $1,255,378.69 2029 12. Year #6 $10,115,337.87 $229,739.50 $1,025,639.18 $9,089,698.69 $1,255,378.68 2029 13. Year #7 $9,089,698.69 $206,445.19 $1,048,933.49 $8,040,765.20 $1,255,378.68 2030 14. Year #7 $8,040,765.20 $182,621.82 $1,072,756.87 $6,968,008.33 $1,255,378.69 2030 15. Year #8 $6,968,008.33 $158,257.37 $1,097,121.32 $5,870,887.01 $1,255,378.69 2031 16. Year #8 $5,870,887.01 $133,339.56 $1,122,039.13 $4,748,847.88 $1,255,378.69 2031 17. Year #9 $4,748,847.88 $107,855.81 $1,147,522.88 $3,601,325.01 $1,255,378.69 2032 18. Year #9 $3,601,325.01 $81,793.28 $1,173,585.41 $2,427,739.60 $1,255,378.69 2032 19. Year #10 $2,427,739.60 $55,138.81 $1,200,239.88 $1,227,499.72 $1,255,378.69 2033 20. Year #10 $1,227,499.72 $27,878.97 $1,227,499.72 $0.00 $1,255,378.69 2033 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 30 Appendix B: Major Repair and Rehabilitation for Stations Station/Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Fire Station #11 $ 255,571 $ 26,095 $ 186,491 $ 103,068 AC Unit $ 155,179 Carpet/Tile/Hardwood/ Concrete Finishes $ 67,652 Ceiling Finishes/Drop Ceilings/Acoustic Tile $ 12,490 Exhaust Fan $ 47,306 Expansion Tank $ 1,069 Furnace $ 139,185 Heat Pump $ 95,008 Interior Walls $ 21,857 Water Heater $ 5,384 $ 26,095 Fire Station #12 $ 315,770 $ 111,539 $ 304,134 $ 117,146 $ 26,577 $ 7,856 Air Compressor $ 16,468 Air Handler Unit $ 297,923 Automatic Transfer Switch $ 10,079 Boiler $ 59,290 Carpet/Tile/Hardwood/ Concrete Finishes $ 65,049 Fire Alarm Systems $ 30,022 Furniture/Millwork $ 47,776 Lighting $ 24,290 Pump $ 6,211 $ 6,787 Radiant Heater $ 6,644 Roofing $ 291,480 Unit Heater $ 19,933 Water Heater $ 1,069 Fire Station #13 $ 407,561 $ 423,400 $ 21,529 AC Unit $ 13,439 Air Compressor $ 21,529 Ceiling Finishes/Drop Ceilings/Acoustic Tile $ 17,507 Condensing Unit $ 4,750 $ 5,040 Duct Heater $ 17,497 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 31 Station/Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Evaporative Unit $ 5,320 Exhaust Fan $ 87,660 Expansion Tank $ 950 Expansion Tank $ 1,077 Exterior Finishes $ 61,273 Fan Terminal Unit $ 143,596 Fire Alarm Systems $ 46,432 Furniture/Millwork $ 65,649 Heat Exchanger $ 7,601 Lighting $ 38,693 Roofing $ 314,476 Fire Station #14 $ 129,419 $ 123,889 $ 67,011 Carpet/Tile/Hardwood/ Concrete Finishes $ 64,872 Doors/Hardware $ 38,759 Electrical Panel $ 109,664 Interior Walls $ 19,756 Pump $ 2,139 Water Heater $ 85,130 Fire Station #16 $ 3,075 $ 117,176 $ 49,712 $ 6,921 $ 13,658 Automatic Transfer Switch $ 3,075 Exhaust Fan $ 42,536 Generator $ 6,921 Interior Walls $ 13,658 Package Unit $ 117,176 Unit Heater $ 7,176 Fire Station #17 $ 1,069 Water Heater $ 1,069 Grand Total $ 318,845 $ 891,847 $ 379,941 $ 856,456 $ 157,387 $ 214,191 Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 32 Appendix C: Fire Station 11 Drive Time (Aid Unit) Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 33 Appendix D: Fire Station 12-13 Drive Time (Ladders) Back to Top Capital Facilities Plan 34 Appendix E: Fire Station 16/Warehouse Preliminary Layout Back to Top RESOLUTION NO. 4513 EXHIBIT F memorandum regarding "Transportation Impact Fee Update – Industrial Land Uses," City of Renton dated September 23, 2022 12131 113th Avenue NE, Suite 203, Kirkland, WA 98034 | 425.821.3665 | MEMORANDUM Date: September 23, 2022 TG:1.22123.00 To: Paul Hintz, City of Renton From: Jon Pascal, PE, Transpo Group Brent Turley, PE, Transpo Group cc: Brianne Bannwarth, PE, City of Renton Subject: Transportation Impact Fee Update - Industrial Land Uses The purpose of this memorandum is to document proposed updates to the City of Renton Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) methodology. The updates serve to assist the City in considering appropriate changes to the TIF methodology to better reflect the impacts of industrial land uses on the transportation system. The information presented will allow the City to utilize an updated TIF rate schedule based on the estimated truck activity for specific industrial land uses. Overview of the Existing TIF Methodology The methodology for the Renton TIF is documented in Council Resolution 4299 in the Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation (Henderson, Young, & Company, July 5, 2016). The overall methodology remains unchanged from this document except for the additional adjustments to the rate schedule for industrial land uses. As explained in the 2016 Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation, the transportation impact fees are calculated by the estimated number of new person trip ends that are created by the proposed land use. Person trip ends are used instead of vehicle trip ends because it better aligns with the mitigation fees that are for bicycle and pedestrian facilities that also use person trips. The number of net new total PM peak hour person trips in the City divided by the total TIF eligible projects costs were used to calculate a $7,145.85 PM peak hour base fee. The cost per PM peak hour trip fee is utilized to calculate a fee rate for each category of land use. The existing rate schedule was developed for commonly used land use categories to assist the City in the development review process and determination of the resulting impact fee. The process to develop impact fees by land use required converting vehicle trip generation rates from national sources into person trip rates to align with the multimodal goals of the City. The conversion process from vehicle trips to person trips utilized the following steps (see Appendix A in 2016 Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation): 1. Original vehicle trip rates were assembled from national source (latest ITE Trip Generation manual). 2. This “vehicle trip rate” is multiplied by 1.353 average vehicle occupancy and divided by vehicle model share of 74.2% to create a “person trip rate.” This person trip reflects all modes of travel. 3. A pass-by reduction factor is then applied depending on the land use. A “pass-by” trip reflects that certain land uses do not create new overall trips, but divert an existing trip already on the network (e.g. getting coffee on the way to work at a new coffee shop). 4. A final conversion factor is applied (83.3%) to reduce the trip rate to reflect only person trips using vehicles. 2 Updated TIF Methodology for Industrial Land Uses The following sections summarize the proposed updates to the TIF methodology to better account for the proportionate impacts of industrial land uses related to increased truck activity. Additional Industrial Land Uses The list of land uses and trip generation rates in the 2016 Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation (Table 9) included only three industrial land uses; General Light Industrial, Manufacturing, and Mini-Warehouse (Self-Storage). It is proposed that the list of land uses and trip generation rates be expanded to include additional industrial land use types. The expanded list of land use categories is based upon the land use definitions and rates identified in the ITE Trip Generation manual (11th Edition, 2021). The following new land uses are proposed to be added to the City’s rate schedule: · #130 Industrial Park · #150 Warehousing · #154 High-Cube Warehouse: Transload/Short-Term · #155 High-Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS) · #156 High-Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub · #157 High-Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage The High-Cube Warehouse land use is relatively new and reflects the change in local and regional freight distribution and delivery services due to the rapid, recent growth in e-commerce over the last few years. The High-Cube Warehouse land use is broken into four categories to represent different facilities at different stages of the product delivery process. Updated Vehicle Trips Rates As part of the update process, the trip rate for Manufacturing was updated to reflect the ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition. This was a slight increase from 0.73 to 0.74 trips per 1,000 square feet of building space. The added land uses mentioned above also have trip rates that reflect the ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition. Quantifying Truck Impacts on the Transportation Network In urban settings such as the City of Renton, industrial land uses typically comprise a portion of the available commercially zoned land. Due to the nature of the businesses, the industrial land uses can generate a large number of daily truck trips. Analysis has shown that large trucks have higher equivalent axle load impact on arterials than cars (up to 100-car equivalents). The higher amount of truck trips in industrially zoned areas can have a significant impact on overall traffic operations and the necessary pavement and base material depth of arterials, resulting in increased capital costs. Large tractor trailer trucks take the same physical space as up to four normal passenger cars in a traffic queue. In addition, the slower acceleration and deceleration that is typical of large trucks can adversely impact normal traffic operations. For example, a truck stopped at a traffic signal is slow to accelerate and may take the same time to traverse a major intersection on a green light as the time that 3 to 5 passenger cars would take for the same traffic movement. The term “Passenger-Car Equivalents” (PCE) is used in traffic engineering to better reflect traffic operations with trucks present. For larger tractor trailer trucks, a PCE of 4 is typically used. For example, if 10 trucks per hour are making a left-turn at an intersection, then a PCE volume would be 40 vehicles per hour. For purposes of the TIF methodology, each truck is considered as a four- passenger-car equivalent. 3 Truck Adjustment Factor The PCE ratios were used to update the Impact Fee Rate Schedule to better reflect truck activity for each industrial land use. No truck factors were applied to other land uses. The ITE Trip Generation 11th Edition now includes trip generation rates for trucks for certain land uses, including industrial land uses. By comparing truck trip generation rates and total vehicle trip generation rates, a typical truck percentage was determined by land use. As shown in Table 1, the truck percentages ranged from 5 to 25 percent per land use category. Using the identified truck percentages, and a PCE factor of 4, a Truck Percent Factor was calculated to increase trip rates to reflect PCE vehicle trip ends by each industrial land use category. Table 1 summarizes the Truck Percent Factors and the resulting PCE Vehicle Trip Ends. Table 1. Passenger Car Equivalent Trip Ends per Industrial Land Use Category ITE # Industrial Land Use Category Vehicle Trip Ends1 Percent Trucks2 Truck Percent Factor3 PCE Vehicle Trip Ends4 130 Industrial Park 0.34 12% 1.36 0.46 140 Manufacturing 0.74 5% 1.15 0.85 150 Warehousing 0.18 17% 1.51 0.27 154 High-Cube Warehouse: Transload/ Short-Term 0.10 10% 1.30 0.13 155 High-Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS) 0.16 7% 1.21 0.19 156 High-Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub 0.64 10% 1.30 0.83 157 High-Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage 0.12 25% 1.75 0.21 Source: Transpo Group, 2022 1. Vehicle trip ends updated to reflect latest editions of the ITE Trip Generation manual (11th Edition, 2021). This is the number of vehicle trips generated during the PM peak hour per 1,000 square feet of building area. 2. Percent trucks reflects the how many trucks are anticipated within the total trips generated by the land use. Values shown are based on the truck trip generation factors provided in ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition, 2021) 3. Truck Percent Factor is a factor that is used to convert vehicle trip ends to passenger-car equivalent trip ends. This factor incorporates both the percent trucks information and a 4:1 passenger-car to truck ratio. 4. PCE Vehicle Trip Ends reflects the passenger-car equivalent trip ends. This is calculated by multiplying the truck percent factor by the vehicle trip ends rate. While some land uses such as Warehousing had a higher truck percentage at 17 percent, the actual PCE vehicle trip ends are lower than uses such as Manufacturing or High-Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub which generate a higher rate of vehicles per 1,000 square feet of building area. The updates to focus on in Table 1 are the updated PCE vehicle trip ends compared to existing vehicle trips ends. Updated Impact Fee Rate Schedule The following summarizes how the PCE vehicle trip ends are utilized in updating the impact fee rate schedule for each of the industrial land uses. The rate schedule that includes the PCE factor is also compared to a rate schedule without the factor to understand how the updated methodology captures more of the infrastructure costs to serve land uses that have a higher amount of truck trips. New Vehicle Impact Fee Rates Table 2 summarizes the new Vehicle Impact Fee Rates based on incorporating the PCE Vehicle Trip Ends from Table 1 (both new ITE rates and truck adjustment factors). The conversion of vehicle trip ends, to person trip ends, to vehicle new person trip ends, to vehicle impact fee rates is consistent with the methodology documented in the 2016 Rate Study for Impact Fees for Transportation. 4 Table 2. Updated Transportation Impact Fee Rates Per Unit of Development ITE # Land Use PCE Vehicle Trip Ends1 Person Trip Ends2 Vehicle New Person Trip Ends3 Vehicle Impact Fee Rate (cost per sq ft)4 130 Industrial Park 0.46 0.84 0.70 $5.00 140 Manufacturing 0.85 1.55 1.29 $9.22 150 Warehousing 0.27 0.50 0.41 $2.93 154 High-Cube Warehouse: Transload/ Short-Term 0.13 0.24 0.20 $1.43 155 High-Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS) 0.19 0.35 0.29 $2.07 156 High-Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub 0.83 1.52 1.26 $9.00 157 High-Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage 0.21 0.38 0.32 $2.29 Source: Transpo Group, 2022 1. See Table 1 for passenger-car equivalent trip end calculations 2. Person trip ends reflects a conversion of vehicle trips to person trips using AVO of 1.353 and 74.2% mode share. 3. Vehicle New Person Trip Ends applies a 83.3% factor to convert total person trips into person trips using vehicles. 4. Vehicle impact fee rates reflect the cost per square feet by using the $7145.85 per trip fee. Applicants for building permits who propose development in any of the industrial land use categories in Table 2 can calculate the total transportation impact fee as follows: 1. Select the appropriate land use category from Table 2, and find the impact fee rate per unit in the far right column. 2. Determine the amount of square feet of development the applicant proposes to build. 3. Multiply the impact free rate by the square footage amount to be built. The result is the total impact fee to be paid to the City. Comparison of Vehicle Impact Fees With and Without Truck Adjustment Factor To understand how the updated rate schedule for industrial land uses would compare to a rate schedule without the truck adjustment factor, a comparison table has been prepared. Table 3 compares the updated Vehicle Impact Fee Rate with and without the Truck Adjustment Factor methodology. The “without condition” still uses the updated ITE Trip Generation rates from the 11th Edition for a better comparison. As shown in Table 3, the Truck Adjustment Factor increased the Vehicle Impact Fee Rate about 15 to 78 percent than the default trip generation rate and fee. Table 3. Comparison of Vehicle Impact Fee Rate With and Without Truck Adjustment Factor ITE # Land Use WITHOUT PCE Vehicle Impact Fee Rate (cost per sq ft)1 WITH PCE Vehicle Impact Fee Rate (cost per sq ft)2 Percent Difference 130 Industrial Park $3.72 $5.00 +35% 140 Manufacturing $8.00 $9.22 +15% 150 Warehousing $1.93 $2.93 +52% 154 High-Cube Warehouse: Transload/ Short-Term $1.07 $1.43 +33% 155 High-Cube Warehouse: Fulfillment Center (NS) $1.72 $2.07 +21% 156 High-Cube Warehouse: Parcel Hub $6.93 $9.00 +30% 157 High-Cube Warehouse: Cold Storage $1.29 $2.29 +78% Source: Transpo Group, 2022 1. Reflects the vehicle impact fee with the new ITE Trip Generation 11th Editions rates but without any truck adjustment factors (passenger-car equivalents). 2. Reflects the vehicle impact fee with the new ITE Trip Generation 11th Editions rates and includes truck adjustment factors (passenger- car equivalents). 5 Next Steps It is assumed the updated vehicle impact fee rate schedule for industrial land uses would be incorporated into the overall 2021-2022 fee schedule available on the City’s web site.