Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLUA97-127 i i NIL g 9i as ;jNj; Zk F CCZ •o W. $0 ZQ m 3 W U 41 • — Z W, 0 . 0 0 0 0 O 0 CT)• CO 3 0' Z 30' Q CI- -9' 12' al101/ T c, o 0 - - - - iM1 - . 1 70 t — o o o A I I I— A -I • I-- O — TENANT I TENANT I TENANT 2 TENANT 2 TENANT 2 TENANT 3 TENANT 3 w0 -__ 2250 SF 3000 5F 1500 5F 1500 SF 1500 SF 3000 SF 2250 SF Lil RETAIL/OFFICE SERVICE BAY AREA SERVICE BAYS RETAIL/OFFICE SERVICE BAYS SERVICE BAY AREA RETAIL/OFFICE / — ,r p AREA (S 7 BAYS®15'X 25 (S BAYS o AREA (3 BAYS® (S BAYS a 15'X 25') AREA '�— i/r' --- IS X 257 IS'X 257 I— �s a Q l , - g Ign L •=J d n '1 ® © O O 5 © m © O i 300' a g 0 o c co 2 KEYNOTES O w LEGEND OFLOOR PLAN o _ I. 12'-0'X 12'-0'OVERHEAD DOOR 0 BUILDING STRUCTURAL GRIDLINE __`` . s 39'''0'X 12'-0'OVERHEAD DOOR rc `50'X l'-0'STORE FRONT DOOR w '--Y'''d.YF'R)3'-0'X l'-0'STOREFRONT DOORS ( KEYNOTE DESIGNATION LL J• 5: STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM • 1 6.'CONCRETE SIDEWALK LANDING,77 fj ALUMINUM STOREFRONT UJINDWO SYSTEM LANTER/LANDSCAPE • • .-4. kj1' AREA AE OF CANOPY/ROOF ABOVE snm S."HOLLOW METAL PERSONNEL DOOR A-2 ', °a 975RE .` N _ S.W. 10th STREET_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - a EN19T.Fl.OGT PROPOSED 6'O' PRCP09FD e'-0' PX5nN9 PIPE E+asnn9 POST FEVER VAULT CI.RD/OVff9L3UD91ALK EKI9nNS POST LLRtB/6BrtHi91DEYtALK NYDRAIIT LISNT STANDARD WONT 9TA. ARD A _ tr- IIIII ( IIIIIIIIIIII IIIII // —I-- = • 9` 9 `-10'fYOD. ( : j� `GX9 tb I, � y aPPER•It I :�`CLRB NO ease OP .. USW VAULT 9a 5 g5 I n•.o' — $ $ / EIR MI�O ui t Y�9tl 1F I it RIM 1 W 6I ES4 1 I _ I �'�1 a g 1101 a • ___I y/ IF R v NEW �/ ary //, IV LI Id vI im � mI lid 1,TAX LOT 6D9 0w ion • = 1 _ o� _ R _ �� . _ii= Z /� `ul9nra R ° E%19n11YJ = POI&A POLE 1I .911b v P0.E I T-- + • , I] POWER VAULT u F_ 1O 81 \ Ul 4 ,,,,, - - aelm• _ — — 9• \ — — — — _ _ _ y `1 1:. :•'� 1' LOCATION OP NEN EI.('P81 C I 1 PROPERTY LINE 11IIIIIIII PA911N0 f( Slre•I CCU�CUTTEPANDPR4,K • POPER VAULTS em5rm6 PROPERTY L. TO PE RP,P.,RIDED S.W,GRADY WAY �H) a H co H as U F SITE DATA T o DRIVE WAY DRIVE WAY U 2 Sire WRNS,. CA-ARn3UAL UmaNCW. r 0 9nE AREA. 63.900 Sc(IAT Aosos CC Q 2 911LDUN9 AREA RorAU -I3OOn eP I 7 I I NOTE:TO BE CONFIRMED I Scy LOT COVERAGE 24b I NI 1 7 � 4w `gym 1RE P',IJ� A, An LLILDIN31lIONT 90 0• ' "" 0 1 Y ((� I.BIO-SHALE AREA I CC m Ir'. PROroP.✓9 BNLOIN91a'IBHT O+b•MAK SITE 2.NATURAL VEGITATION AREA(2%) Tn IpiME Ic At RPaIIRm.SMACK A.0 MIN I I I 3.INTERIOR LANDSCAPING 1 I " r"h D T'a PROPOSED SETBACK TTOY4,0- . V / LL J PARKINS MOWED. 52 STALLS N400 SP) TOTAL PARR.PPO/IGPD. 9T STALLS (5e STALLS PER 1000 SP) / W U INTERIOR PARKINS LOT LADSCAPP. 4339 9PlIP(4339r33.161) Z 501 G E N TE . SITE FLAN (�bp�N�� O .' TOTAL LAD9CND16, 11320 9P. N 6u4 T.w `/ - SHEEP NO 2 ALL OTHER LMD9OAnND. 906I sP. LEGAL DESGRIFTION, LOT 3 'H — K�sa^IBLE(WOO)-3 RENTON SHORT PLAT No. HIO5144003 STADARD(PATO)-DIGC COMPACT(E.NP)-n Plot) TAX LOT No. 19210590E407 W -_ VICINITY MAP OF• JOB NO. o - 97105.00 II 10 T T EP (i) 3 2 I o p:E911 11 1 aa:: '' a a i�t:� I I I I -r' Z — _I-- Z a W T W (3 ()NORTH ELEVATION - O 100 " I— Er B c CB Er■_■_■_■ Y . IIIII=IMMIhi. i N N I II■■■■ ■—■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■illi■ ■■■1 , —i■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■ i „ I j w EAST ELEVATION 0 WEST ELEVATION w i/PARIIAET T T (11) EP T T (--F) 0 ® ci , .., mai.- :._TENANT SIGNAGE AREA I—�� r 1 (P) e° 0 T ,,. .:„4„,„ • TENANT AIGNAGE AREA 0 STATE a..s.cw e,.�.�..�. — t - 51G E _ - - �— 1 1 T c. p °SOUTH ELEVATION _- _ 0 0 0 0 1 a c. 6 K 7 O KEY NOTES Z I. 12'-0'X 12'-0'OVERHEAD DOOR C 2. 9'-0'X 12'-0'OVERHEAD DOOR • 3. 3'-0'X l'-0'STOREFRONT DOOR z — 4. (PR)3'-0'X 1'-0'STOREFRONT DOORS a 5. PAINTED CONCREE WALL PANEL CC — 6. PAINTED STUCCO/DRYVIT FASCIA ' J1 " 1 $ . ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM i , u "� S S. PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING 9.PREFINISHED STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING 10. PAINTED AGENT BAND 5.5'WIDTH - II. STUCCO/CONCRETE PANEL 3/4'SCORELINE SNEET W. A-3 CC 3 j • ., •... JOB97pS00 li:2F<` - •` • • • 501 CENTER q y xw_R COVER SHEET e TB Z A PORTION OF SECTION 19,TWP.23N,RGE 5E,W.M. } O RENTON,WASHINGTON 3 z O < a VICPfTY MAP w O w LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF RECORD cc 'X = ,. V.. --� I Provided by First American Title insurance Company 0 �.--�--�� (First American Order No.335092-5 _ _ _ __�—_ _ _ _ _ The land referred to N this commitment Is sdmtee in the slate Q ' pp ' SOUTHWEST 10th b Hbh I a Washington,Count of King and is eeeera.d as follows: ; .-.... • __ _ � 1 -..—V. d:�i ni of weM1`nBcolnwnnime�i i i z o�d`triarTr`aa�Dai" J • I � /' — 7Southwest• Quarter of the Northwest Quarto of IM1e Northwest IL_� , I f l li _1 Quarter of Section 19,Township 23 North,Range 5 East, y I • //I /- �� _• Willamette Meridian,in King County,Washington.described os follows -t t _ „I„� \ l It e `,• PARCEL A: J1__ BEGINNING at the intersection of the West line of Und Avenue, ( PROPOS D BUILDING`9 !T,j----T-y 1�—�=j being 40 feel West.measured at right angles from the centerline �` F �23.J I ��' _� -_ fit /` = there!,and the Northerly line of sold RigM1t of WaY,which L'/ �_LDING �••/ Southerly The al said Right of Waou__I I —.� I-__ __ __ �1.......�..________ ..._ — e of sold of_ r A•r "�Uf--Z��'l i:, Q Thence Northeasterly along said Southerly tin Right 1•/ ,%! Z Way to said West line of Lind Avenue; =d �` ' T I �%/ !- / � Thence Narthedy along sold West The of Lind Avenue to the POINT }.-' _—Q I I OF BEGINNING. S G w —tit.- T �I : ����i�i�l�eiu�<<ilidii : Ili PARCEL B --l` ^= cr W Yt yaortty lhaM1PUM1 eteS and Electric RaawoY RigM1t of Way!'" Lii �' 1 ..,. /i l-- ""'--- Renton BrancM1),in the Northwest Quarter of Section 19,Township o W1al� SOUTHS �}��� 23 North,Rage 5 East.WOomette Meridian,in Nina County.as follows: W ❑m^ WEST GRADI YYH\Y WashinN BEGINNING al the IntelsecUen al he North margin of Southwest Z O N _ - - -- - - - - - Grady Way with ilia Weal margin of Llnd Ave ue southwest 0 O 'v � Thence"gtB"'stercy along the NortM1 margin ai the Southwest 11 l 4 • 3 �he;aW�,aU:o��wy°right a Southwest wavy Way.to U V E9 Southerly line of the a ed Burlington Northern Railroad ❑ 1ii3 OI siboate In the County of King,Slate of WashingtonTOGETHER W1m Lot 3 el City of Renton Short Plat retarded under Retarding No.B105149003,Records•Washington. Situate In the County of King,State of Washington. LL 0 VERTICAL •DATUM a;n AWOK . CIT(OF RENTON MONUMENT T54-CONCRETE MONUMENT IN CASE AT THE INTERSECTION OF n SW 7TH STREET AND SENECA AVENUE SW. ELEVATION:22.313 FEET(6.801 meters) g6 r 3 E c d METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION BASIS OF BEARING hi m li Y 82 that portion of Burlington Northern Inc's former 120 loot wide Right-of-Way In Government Lot 2 and FOUND CON CRETE T MONUt OTT STREETCASE ASSHOWN 3 the Fractional Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 19. RECORD MFORMATON ON SHORT PUT N0.81 0 514 9 0 0J ry`r Io w Township 23 North,Range 5 East Willamette Menden,In King County,Washington,described as Wows: ; o SS ggr _ — Commencing of the intersection of Southwest Grady Thence North l]'211'30•East along said Northwesterly na REaI r2„ms or r...aT2-uc',.o Fg s.-.... a'S,cri, • Way and Lind Avenue Southwest,said intersection Rght-of-Way line,a eS..of 2.27 feel to a line m m monument N a ors parallel with the West Right-of-Way The of said Lind y - Thence North of 11'24•Eaal along the centerline of venue Southwest. (Gin agAB said Lind Avenue Southwest.a distance of 51.47 feet Thence North 011F20 East along said parallel line, (7 Pi NN E - to the Northeasterly extension of the Northwesterly a distance of 123,54 feet to the Southeasterly Right- J en`� Right-of-Way line al said southwest Grady Way. al-Way line of Southwest 10th Street;• Q t PROPOgD Ce Thence South 2y]821 West Hong said Northeasterly Thence North)TY6'30•East along said Southeasterly � • x O extension,a distance of 41.17 feet to the West Right- Right-of-Way line,o distance of 400.00 feel to sold - _ If - of-Way The of Und Avenue Southwest and the TRUE t Right-of-Way Me of find Avenue Southwest; ul _ / PONT OF BEGINNING: Thence South U111'24•West along said West Right- l Id A mum - �\//� 20 frtn wwrrt Thence south 11,521•West along said Northwesterly of-Way line,a distance of 17527 feet to the TRUE 1 I V'y l� �sEmw` Right-of-Way line of Southwest wady Way,a distance of POINT OF BEGINNING. s cgNbgV 395.00 feel; •411 � N Thence North 12'31'39'West,a distance of 50.03 feel 'C� N SECTION A A b a the Northwesterly Right-of-Way The of the Puget Sound isSi oeP CITY OF RENTON WORKS 0 13 Power and light Company Right-of-Way line(formerly IN .1{o PYTINEM'OP PUBLIC (0 . the Puget Sound Electric Railway Right-of-Way line, 11111. s,yy,`67 pVw TWA •_2q - Renton Branch); 5 -. I` EMPIPE5 sf•]aAlf I m ,F LG=-_ �b _ O ofrosm 0,00 • I- — 1.00 Na ,eepe ay Awl DATE A,wa.®� ,,.,..�, .ffr 1 ff 2 Om Fa.50550,.Date/ime 0e/25/1995 T ion s.m•e- - OW zeosx-PA2E1. .2-PS MBA. n-r-4W 1 \ I % : •LY.,---,.-----• . -r '. 1 i •' . : ':77:S---1--•f---If-- :' '• .LOMILICRES 1,141 TRAM1 0 p,,,W..., h ,\ ' -- i \Wpi , r—::--EHE000cH1 NUM '11GIIMII'71 ,_ n 0 D iEVO .1113E'EUB:-.: 0 0 0 0.0 --rf.--__,-- , // •Ti E. ..c=. ). .........._ _._ii, 3-------r----- - , ', " ‘..,‘„ T., .•:'1'0. k,' '..,L'e•- \ k_ i ''''---''' .1-1'"cd= ,{ )4".:!—T:'P''''"' ""Et Ack.'V 1 ru,..\'\A.*, • — — " —ii 2.... -IA le k•'' i IIIEN ''---t. . ---` -1-V--A':-. VI -1.! gl , „ .1' Zit l=—1'1 b . - ..2:1\q:\ ' - ;.: P ‘1:''' ' - 1—7 * •-7 - Q ....to %'..,,1111. i . — D,,..^.7: , ..,4-1-114•••• :'::::4-!-'-'.X.-t: Fl• ,,,,,..i7.:,.,: . VI ti • qEY.:" Z't te:. '• t . \ '.. d k ;,i...„,,,,,,,L -' !,' • .. ., , il — -- • PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE AND TREE PLAN 263D'E ]_0:1M, t D(R, &� rez0 - - - - -- - BA55 or'ELWIC L, LAWNz tLD.,, s 10th 1_ DR,A Cz �� \ V' N 2,z63o �1 9��a 1 ° . , , ' _ _ ,, 1 w ;:.:.: wcl Dr HArtAT • I. -� _ Q 7:: Gnreift �., i u Y KIS,Kt�WTt' G LF' ': 3 0 ill ...p,'�/lrI s .,•t, ".. . . . �A�•—. . 1 1 .,,�—-,T v v ' v ,: ; !vx/r .`...:,7-Q•' �.7• :� �\ O '" -- •.tea') E fl02S -iok`2N_ I I 'I ,,•11 �r -II _ o E • 1 N - _ I i 7PER Nfl ' -,-�" UILDING i _ .M.tv..� _ O PROPOSED B .� •.. A—NAIVE a -i I F.F=23.01 1 —— — ----- — J I. . II"o„ 1 \ =�e mi,e VEe r QN NAzD ALDER I.,LNl in.r,» '� ; , ;s� _A ,,•"`_• , „„%I LIVIEGI -". � G g CI&MUG'nvD aPEP.�m1s 11..-_'��x_L.IJ�.1._." iu. .% _ A.,1Nix ' ' A A A £ :- A s:.AK wsaA A 1-/A l:/•A 4 _ a w_.o"aolRcs a i , • � ° rrT-+t I E n0 i G 2] I /'2. li_ it rA LOT UNE 6, -1,: - - rL�.� o E mueN.K6 a. _ MO LE - - --- �'�- ?s"'----ec— - -S-L -SCzs•-r�1"� -- �CC,L.,.Lw. ' ■ • -- -- ..----- -- -------- y �\_ �. »o' ' L d 'N ^b m a vv vu z.s -,\ � -}i M I'I5�"•"- -'- - _�_ __ "'� _gyI / K m . ¢.. c. - „ O WU.H.DN 17 + a IF t2.5D 1 SEED LAWNiii e ° ;v uNN as $- .. - a g w. . 11EC iT Ell 'PUGET SOUND NATIVE PLANTS SOUTHWEST GAADY WAY PLANT LIST F SYM00L NAME SIZE CONDITION SPACING AURORA REMARKS SI L NAME f SCE�W. CouomON SPACING DUANIIIY REMARKS • �Y•j/ N 7/:3'7 I'[ St O.Et(MI in -- nxCPiGx9UY/ B. B M. B e B A SNOAN 5 NULR-STEM,]]TRUNKS)2 ^• --. -_ RES:- -RUA/ -- -5 -8 B---SM. a St f RO CW ONE GROtnxG SFAROx,HA%. C+A"E(0) - - -- / UDSwEET GUNm NUga teWI IR STREET 12 USE, %01'MOSSON]' . / RMCO SE0a31ATA'KNANUN'/ 5 8 B A yWOAN t STAKE ED 0 05010 100E ISCM6 IDOT s...0 Q n P ANZw CxEARY 1.]'[AL e 0 OMS IATIMIN / .....15'CA BBe AS SHDNN 2 STA2 ND WE ONE OWNS SFISDNCO m e m g AIER CRER,ALIFOBEPM CONTAINER ,CII r. - m.<..................... -u 15''6 I r•C•N•AINER 5 SNMH•2 STAKEyAYp•OU]ONE GROW Sf;AS(lE LOUEMA/ -2" CallAI E A-5 Ga> 1 I . ���lll tur'sonx. ej r ZeJ•_-i1• C yY n SNORE PAIR vulE M• Y 'y n ''E IN JUMPER.CNN FwwA uraG/ WxlNvot S, A' hip-, Lg i I!1 _ Nr• A/ 6.HE 0 8 B AS SNOWN A STAKE AND our MEIIWOMt1G HI '"' __ �W6 ^3r,i REM/ 15 B-G'AMON-AS wide.LB- ' ]• W ry — P NDo�G TWO./ y l '..../ ® °a G �R N° ���\1SII//O� / .'L PRUNUS D1ro WTt S'OTTO M OR n' 24 8 0 25 HOID 3'FROM BORDERS O. (7� L - E i"IW PLKATA 6 HE B e B IS SH0.1,1 5 STAKE AND GUY ONE ROMNG ON J aLBTFRN CDA.R GROUND GOER •' I Q •� NAalMEx95'NR2E5'/ _• ')• `�. -, aryl/111/ DnaOwiEPA/ OR WATER COMMgWltt EDGE;INKIER RECOMMENDED 0 1" aLE E FROM RONDOS AO ES t� GD DaGARpo '"'N"1ER "I mu uuwre w TD Maw ''' b - ED]x GWFEMM/ ME-N' COM. A'-5' 24 A ONES WOO,MO A'radii BOOM AS H]ND SOD `,10,1 `4 be°t '�i.5 r/.'•�,= - e31•,NE, .STATE OF /-` N F,`,��" "�i• CFPASRD,WS/(oSMNNxMJ 24-30° BR 6' A MArtR GLLNNY EDGE wIMFA REmuuFNOm ^ O ZONE." v In ` wH!/PLwtEa ELSE-Clrt 1PAK11pN • ( TM'�°o R P a°C 5 . ii}-� ]�: [CMAMER /J oEPAR K9 W/ 6'MINIMUM N' COrW FANO.5PACWG 0R ArLrOVEN: FE000 PLWING IRiER M��SLSWWLILAA��f IIAAS A5 NOTED "CA I I I Z0�1•A I. . o x5MAu5 YF. 1RDSS I I - I 7 I I (NAMD tNLY te,H Rw. m _ EM se.. 6, N„ d,E . ..., ..,., .•FrPL1 1r 5 m RI,KO_N>ti,./.m.0e/2./,BO]2,.2] BOOR, O Meos]Mrs. 26.052-PA26052-P1,26052-,s26052Ns,. • . PRELIMINARY GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN .' Tv: „AI ....-...-- .,Se:...........:...y,. ,.....,.....Ta cY,a Hytti:.,., 20 o : • .,�,u Z �i—'mod.'.. ��--pp 5 A, r O -_ TT26'00•E 1.115.02(N) 1555.08(P) _— / OuwROPW° _ __ _ - O. _ - _— Z e / &516 OF BORING PROPOSED Sawn UNE B -----t2---- • 1 0 6n UTHWE T h , c 3 SO o. or �i- \ N TT25'00•E 31,.)JOR1VE • CO M221=1WITIMMMMEMICW. ---- Nifaleffi-- --f .,ram_ ffl II ,-',v I�',,■p I lam � �0. I- z \\ p N. •_,9 aI ffi`Via. yv- yi ^�5'w %+ ,., ',{',I 00 r-a a �'.xa' P. I • \toe I ) a ,v m\ ,' / -,,�,/, 120. _�— .m+c sonar s M. COLill r % PRI F. D BUILDING I i 3-I�_ :�L Z t PaxaP. F. .-23.5 1, I/ l'la L —Fit _ <,------ l'r }} ( — 1 tab \ ' I a.at o, I I I i' 1 l 1''`I_ NISEIll I ED ��� I If ll1''"0�l- � aa`oR ��oN PARCEL lo.sr . 0 n U0 ■■■■■m■■� — �I■■ IT r I '1A ;■■m■mam—�_ or: -- ------ r o II »" ,. .�• .e! , ■■■ im ( r ®1®_ ! Ell 5.- --- Ir1 _ram- +�_r� � —"�� .. �■ e. j. m ETA, mi mg �I am 1m� -:toJ In .,. Pen aus - _ ___ .I-"°'____..... , - o _ _ _ _ __ _ _ et cx --_-t6— —_ --'- :,,.,' LL Tre Ox �r .?.. o f „a, r e f (Wf arr ,.,�--- - - -- 00R fie 95 00' a[cx,rvwrss w 1L 21 sI.E22 r F- --�I7 {\ »-.... ... zero 'C}Sena \ WAIT,.R0R oa E,O, .0 1 0fP \ K ,' \ SOUTHWEST GRADY WAY �� a,-.LE 15.PP.0. '£ -- _ - A _ - _ \\� \) N TT28'21•E 518.9.(N) <m .41J— SEE COVER SHEET FOR ^c t a s SECTION A-A 3 s m x Is 1„_. ¢a 0/ >•Y _ CO O6 » oa 4, b0ac WORKS • C B 8N . •`.ox�l <a°� O • �Ifs`Li� Z m 0.a 9/W., Fe to _ O . -4. m g II it IfI //I / YOB � yETPO SEWAGE ATMEN ►CANT ^ �j ` 1 R mfi � - — vti — , ' I CRES RACE TRACi I1 LONGA tr Js4+t JOCKEY , CLUB 11 ® - 1 i�= ---_.---- c-I,,,, 0 ji ___-% ,?..!.0 —,..„,....__ 1,tt,, �ii�Qi LB; ISQLSQQB:. o jF ® �_ `_ ,.. -` Ms ° m = w iP U U II Q U U U - --o-o:, - �� 0QQ 0; :_fUQQQ1 -- 9 F B ®/, m r _ _ •� ___________, . . , , . L• lal 0000.090 pg V2=QQQQQD_L . m ,:, , _ _ Y =_ , . ,.}?. .. _,.____ Yn F w. y o 1• is \1 •..v mar �� Y.1, :._,,,,tit t 'FF. iCl �p = Z �, kl 1 �jgl 0eon Y t►--. •Y k j PACIFIC AVE .�.�- Y--" - — . t ?.;; ``' - Attu •; k D POWELL AVE SW ..- (� 'I":,'1',.._' : :, : ,.., a� Rx I/ • Y +Af-'I^r ill-,pr - Vi1 '' u �;• 'a• �- I :� I ARLINGT0, 7 IN°D"USTRIAL' !Ai =Cr.. N% L ,.� by -A10 l •` itJtl 1 Z "iA'h.�� t THOMAS r GOt99 , -_S W.-.•t _ IIIVII t m $>ti-1 ' !1_ ' r w,1 t PARK t br0. • :a i } T 1 i k 'G �IQ r�� 'l.l\ti !S ,—,-, -‘;,1-, >�+� < _ I �tl Y Y K b Y.. b Y� irMjI Fi • 1• l`� y \ THOMAS AVE - S 1►" + I N •�' _m I.1.hi. ray�4 NIa .... +�' / • Z§ "s1/lilb f.'Y b roY W tle'Yi's, R L �_ �.t. 'O I li �.\ L� CE�X �kfiklt�1M$., Y• Eir :� tARLINGTON INDUSTRIAL PARK ,NO. I I ( I a. \`1 �~ �.—.r.r ..=LiJJ�.....-.LJ.L11.1.1.1. 'sail,. iil .. li' :g ,T l I I t y, E, y •r-- — — ( • i i I I - _ 'T. : , I I 'dtl -• uO 7)OSENECA^AVE. S.W. $ i • J . SENECA . AVE i SW N� _ — r'1, . - I I , . .,a• ' F I! LL t'si ' � rt. \ - �'— •. a S�_ - 1 =tl a N • i,5I 't Lot2 11 ?' a q,r" �i > b` �ay ' u� v� _:Iv L 40 Aaa r a f = ! 1 \i a ... / .... . 4'4 Y - I • 4A. • t LIND T ErTAVE. c, x SW. . ;`t I I L� .-- . nI) ., a ( 8 „ Y I_!i . t � i ;FE lq”! ' F \b , i 9 ;6✓- �" r •,, 1M _ s 1 �; s5 --1-1 `j 1. •f. . t ..t•. I )i . e..tl.. 7 , _'asy " i iy+ i ' A AoT \ ' t2 it i tiS j1 Y1 '1-',.'":. . s. 't` _{ {`. A & !y_ _Ii;ki, - - , ladles < \ i`s -Yt ; •• iI _ .• l!t !i l ! iMi - 1_ SW \ A , I IIIi TT— ,_T- - i . , i � .yn\v c avp dr ni _ I I III 1. 11 i I1.F .✓.iQARD�NS NO. I , i — v Ra - o _ i 1 r . A ,. .. \„ ; ,%, ai ifo,I .I _ _ 1.ota? > tlr{,.._ 11 At-* 1,1: _ \-1: at �� I`f I sl `1Ms o +�. .0 1.. - e� 1. I ` , _ _._.__.._....___ �"_,..�'%,�„�,,,, — �J -o. ,I€ :.: ,I AVE I- Y 355'i'•• --_ — �` ,,+,mow 1.1 k /- NARDIE AVEESSW �.-- __ -�-'— NALLEY iREEWAYI ��.. !� _�'� 4' ( a L�� r -=7,;-1 CIS . OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator • October 20, 1997 • Ms. Rebecca Davidson John C. Radovich Development Company 2000- 124th Avenue NE, B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: 501 Center Project Project No. LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Davidson: This letter is to inform you that the comment and appeal periods have ended for the Environmental Review Committee's (ERC) Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the above-referenced project. No appeals were filed. This decision is final and application for the appropriately required permits may proceed. The applicant must comply with all ERC Mitigation Measures and Site Plan Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 277-5586. • For the Environmental Review Committee, ark R. P , AICP Project ager cc: Mr.John C. Radovich/Property Owner FINAl DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 Aft la Washington State Northwest Region Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Avenue North Sid Morrison P.O. Box 330310 Seattle,WA 98133-9710 54EC Secretary of Transportation Re (206)440-4000 Oil Nl pu\NN1NG DATE: October 10, 1997 of of ReNtoN TO: Donald Erickson City of Renton,Project Manager 200 Mill Avenue South Renton WA 98055 • • Subject: SR 167 MP 26.48 CS 1716 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance-501 Center Project File No.LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF FROM: e osephson, PE, Manager of Planning &Local • Coordinat. n Washington State Department of Transportation Northwest Region 15700 Dayton Avenue North,MS 122 P. O. Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review this project, which is located at 501 SW 10th Street Bronson Way North. Our response is below: We have reviewed the subject document and have no further comments.•The project will have no significant impact on the state highway system. If you have any questions,please contact Don Hurter at 440-4664 or Vickie Erickson at 440-4915 of my Developer Services section VEE:vee File Name • • r. ) CtJR •••• •.•••..••••••••••••••••.••.•••.••••• ••••••••••••••• AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY MAILING • On the 24Iti day of Septemkek- , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing PoeficoF avtek • documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing • • Rzsckoki QavLasccv‘ • • • • • • • • • (Signature of Sender). SuitiLiti_i rv- STATE OF WASHINGTON • ) SS COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfacto.ry evidence that signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluntary act for the ustsiiandurposes mentioned in the instrument. •. .); • (72/1Z/ 6,t Dated: Notary PUN' in and fort e State of WaghThOtbrP1,1.6. Notary (P • t) D- All'' ARGARET J. OULI , My appointment expiregommissION EXPIRe,46,9. • Project Name: Sot iri:Ver ProjeCt • • Project Number: • LUPt• • 1 Sit- , Lr NOTARY.DOC +"I,x • REPORT City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION DECISION DATE: September 23, 1997 Project Name: 501 Center Project Applicant: John C. Radovich Owner: John C. Radovich File Number: LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF Project Manager: Mark R. Pywell, AICP Project Description: The John C. Radovich Development Company is proposing to build a 15,000 square foot commercial structure on a 50,500 square foot site. The land is currently vacant except for a billboard. The planned use for the structure is auto retail (repair, service, and sale of related parts and accessories). The site will provide 57 parking stalls with access from SW 10th Street and SW Grady Way. Project Location: 501 SW 10th Street Exist. Bldg. Area SF: N/A Proposed New Bldg. Area SF: 15,000 sf Site Area: 50,500 sf Total Building Area SF: 15,000 sf I[rI�JTI II c i�r •,g l e e igy�c,• • i I INUUSTNIA/,.Y _ 1 1 ; I �/.::•'ram [..- -� •;. �.ir� .•i: C� ..e 'OP,: i 1.:eir6 F �.,1 CJ ,I ,�o--;_l ,���i(Y.t71k11 .^- ..,.r• _•....r. = ice_...-- _ 0 Occ1177 "3.*"1.;;CIN10.11, ::: —1 [ . F •, •ii ga ;. �1' 5 lL ' I ,0 I o P ! : Li, 1 a=- -- \ is - J $;,1 'n �� 1 ice'Q '` I 1/414 - +• Project Location Map ERCRPT.DOC City ofRenton P/B/PWDepartment Administrative Site Plan Approval&E,. mental Review Committee Staff Report 501 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF ' REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page 2 of 10 PART ONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND The applicant seeks site plan approval to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial building on a 50,500 square foot lot. The applicant intends to use the building for an automobile service center and for the sale of automobile accessories. PART TWO: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In compliance with RCW 43.21C.240, the following project environmental review addresses only those project impacts that are not adequately addressed under existing development standards and environmental regulations. A. Environmental Impacts The Proposal was circulated and reviewed by various City Departments and Divisions to determine whether the applicant has adequately identified and addressed environmental impacts anticipated to occur in conjunction with the proposed development. Staff reviewers have identified that the proposal is likely to have the following probable impacts: (1) Earth Impacts: The applicant intends to develop a vacant parcel of land with a 15,000 square foot building and associated parking area. The applicant will be importing approximately 3,500 cubic yards of fill material in order to improve the subgrade of the site for the building and parking area. Although the source of the fill material has not been selected at this-time, the applicant will ensure that the fill material meets or exceeds City of Renton Code- requirements. The applicant has submitted a Geotechnical Engineering Study prepared by Earth Consultants, Inc., and dated May 13, 1997. The study indicates that the subsurface of this site contains some peat material. However, preloading of the site will induce settlement of the area where the building will be located. Once the settlement has occurred, then the material will be distributed within the parking area both to level the site and to provide the base material for the parking lot. The applicant has submitted a construction mitigation plan a portion of which includes the provision of a wheel-wash area so that trucks will not track mud out onto the City streets. The trucks carrying fill material and removing debris from the site will access the site from SW 10th Street so that they do not interfere with traffic flows on SW Grady Way. Mitigation Measures: None required beyond that provided by the applicant. Policy Nexus: N/A (2) Air Impacts: Construction phase adverse air quality impacts would include fugitive dust during the grading operation and the exhaust from construction equipment. The applicant will need to sprinkler the site as required to control fugitive dust. Vehicle and construction equipment exhaust are regulated by the state and federal government. No additional mitigation is required for this project. ERCRPT.DOC Ci Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report t1'..o.TP - PP S01 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OFSEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page 3 of 10 During the operation phase of the project, adverse impacts could be associated with the heating source for the building and from vehicles accessing the site. Both of these potential sources of air pollution are regulated by state and federal requirements and monitored by a regional agency. No specific mitigation is required for this project. Mitigation Measures: None required. Policy Nexus: N/A (3) Water Impacts: The applicant has submitted a drainage report prepared by Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. and dated August 25, 1997. The report concludes that the downstream area for this project appears to have no major problems. All drainage segments of the downstream area appear to have adequate capacity to convey all upstream flows. No significant erosion problems were found in the downstream area. The report states that there will be no significant downstream problems resulting from this project as long as it incorporates the City of Renton standards (Code requirements). Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures required. Policy Nexus: N/A (4) Police and Fire Services Impacts: Police Department staff have indicated that there are adequate resources to respond to requests for service from the proposed project. Fire Department staff have noted the Code-required improvements for this project. There is also a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of building area. The fee is estimated at $7,800 for the proposed 15,000 square foot building. This fee is due at the time a building permit is issued. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of building area. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. (Estimate: $0.52 X 15,000 sf= $7,800) Policy Nexus: Fire Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) (5) Transportation Impacts: It is estimated that the proposed project will generate 220 daily trips. In order to mitigate the impact of these trips on the City street system, the City has adopted a Transportation Mitigation Fee of $75 per new trip. The fee for this project is estimated to be $16,500 (220 X $75 = $16,500). This fee will need to be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall submit a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per trip generated prior to the issuance of building permits. (Estimate 220 daily trips X $75 = $16,500) Policy Nexus: Transportation Mitigation Fee Resolution, Environmental Ordinance (SEPA) ERCRPT.DOC Citi•of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E. rnmental Review Committee Staff Report 501 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page 4 of 10 B. Recommendation Based on analysis of probable impacts from the proposal, staff recommend that the Responsible Officials make the following Environmental Determination: DETERMINATION OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE NON- SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED. • Issue DNS with 14 day Appeal Period. XX Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment and A••eal Period. Issue DNS with 15 day Comment and Issue DNS-M with 15 day Comment Appeal Period. Period followed by a 14 day Appeal Period. C. Mitigation Measures 1. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.52 per square foot of building area. This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. (Estimate: $0.52 X 15,000 sf = $7,800) 2. The applicant shall submit a Transportation Mitigation Fee of$75.00 per trip generated prior to the issuance of building permits. (Estimate 220 daily trips X $75 = $16,500) Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Comments 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. No underground or above ground storage tanks are shown on this site plan. If storage tanks are required in the future, separate permits and environmental review may be required. The applicant/landowner will need to check for the required permits with both the Development Services Division and the Fire Prevention Bureau. Surface Water Utility 3. The drainage system and temporary erosion control plans for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Storm drainage (SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. on new impervious surface installed on the site by the project will be required. Waste Water Utility 4. The site is adjacent to Metro east side trunk line and connection would be permitted,through a new City manhole on-site (with back-flow device) if the building F.F. level is below 25 foot elevation. Side sewer connection permit will cost $100. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required. ERCRPT.DOC City-of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&F mmental Review Committee Staff Report 50i CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page 5 of 10 Notes Continued Water Utility 5. All new water mains, fire hydrants, and DDCV assembly (building fire control system) needed to protect the proposed on-site building will be required to meet current Fire Codes/Regulations. Any new main, fire hydrants, or DDCV vault located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water(SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required. Transportation 6. 1 New sidewalks will be required on SW 10th Street. Any proposed driveways to serve the site will be installed per City Codes/Standards and locations approved by the Transportation Engineering Section. A traffic study will be required to provide average daily trip generation in/out of the site. Fire Prevention Bureau 7. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,500 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and two fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 8. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 9. Applicant shall complete a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous material. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of any aboveground or underground storage tanks. 10. Turning radius requirements for fire apparatus is 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside. Applicant shall modify sidewalks and curbs to meet this requirement. Construction Services 11. One hour exterior wall construction with parapet at east wall (less than 20 feet from property line) with protected openings is required. No openings less than five feet are allowed. 12. Limitation on projections is covered by Sec. 503, 1/3 distance to center line where openings require protection. 13. Auto repair shops require floor drains to oil/water separator. Airport Manager 141. The approval of this project and the issuance of building permits shall constitute the determination that the project is compatible with the operation of the airport and the flight of all types of aircraft over this site. 15. If construction height are in excess if a 100:1 slope from the runway centerline, a Notice of Proposed Construction I is required, unless the structure is obviously shielded by existing structures. The information provided does not address shielding and height of the proposed structure above sea level. The applicant will need to work with the Airport Manager in making this determination. 16. The applicant shall not construct lighting which causes glare or other interference with the landing or operation of aircraft from the airport. (City of Renton Code 4-31-17) Community Services 171 All landscaped areas outside of the subject property is to be maintained by the adjacent landowner. 18! We do not recommend Western Cedars on the west property line to be located on the property line due to the spreading growth habit of these trees. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&1, mmental Review Committee Staff Report . S01 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page 6 of 10 Noites Continued Police Department 19: Based upon the size of the building, 7.76 calls for service are anticipated annually. Actual number will probably be I higher. SW 10th Street is located in an area of the City that has a high commercial burglary, auto theft, and theft from vehicle report rate. 20i Recommend that building tools and materials be secured when not us use - especially during the construction phase of the project. The construction site should be fenced with portable fencing and be well lighted with security lighting. This will help reduce theft. 21.All exterior doors should be fitted with heavy-duty dead-bolt locks and a monitored security alarm is recommended. To help prevent thefts from parked vehicles, and auto theft, the lot should be fenced in and access prevented after hours by blocking both entrances/exit areas. 22.; Glass windows and doors should have an application of security film added, or be of a shatter resistant material. PART THREE: ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTION - REPORT & DECISION This decision on the administrative land use action is made concurrently with the environmental determination. A. Type of Land Use Action XX Site Plan Review Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conditional Use Binding Site Plan Special Permit for Grade & Fill Administrative Code Determination B. Exhibits The following exhibits were entered into the record: Exhibit No. 1: Yellow file containing: application, proof of posting and publication, environmental review and other documentation pertinent to this request. Exhibit No. 2: Drawing No. A-1, Site Plan (Received August 26, 1997). Exhibit No. 3: Drawing No. A-2, Building Floor Plan (Received August 26, 1997). Exhibit No. 4: Drawing No. A-3, Building Elevation (Received August 26, 1997). Exhibit No. 5: Drawing No. PL1 of 5, Landscape Plan (Received August 26, 1997). ERCRPT.DOC City-of Renton P/B/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&1 9nmental Review Committee Staff Report 501 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 13,1997 Page 7 of 10 C. Consistency with Site Plan Criteria In reviewing the proposal with respect to the site Plan Approval Criteria set forth in Section 4-31- 33(D) of the Site Plan Ordinance, the following issues have been identified by City Departmental Reviewers and Divisional Reviewers: GENERAL CRITERIA: 1. Conformance with the comprehensive plan, its elements and policies; The subject property is designated Employment Area - Valley on the Land Use Element Map of the Comprehensive Plan. Objective LU-EE.a: Provide for a mix of employment-based uses, including commercial, office, and industrial development to support the economic development of the City of Renton. The proposed project will allow for a variety of commercial uses associated with the developing auto mall in the City of Renton. Policy LU-212.2 Compatible and related land uses should be encouraged to locate in proximity to one another. The proposed structure will house a number of auto related uses, such as service uses and accessory sales uses. 2. Conformance with existing land use regulations; The subject property is zoned Commercial Arterial (CA). The CA zone permits automobile repair and service, and the sale of auto supplies. The proposed structure would allow for these auto related uses in an area adjacent to the City's auto mall area. The CA zone requires a front yard setback of ten (10) feet unless a smaller setback is approved with through the site plan process. In this case the applicant is providing the ten feet of landscaped area along the road frontage. The Municipal Code also requires a minimum of 2% of the subject property to be set aside for a wildlife habitat area. The applicant has established a landscaped area that is 1102 sf in area. This is equal to 2.2% of the site area and meets the Code requirement. Depending on how the building is finally used the applicant would need to provide between 75 and 39 parking stalls. The difference is between whether the building would be entire used for retail uses or for auto repair and service. Presumably, the actual use of the building will be some combination of auto accessory sales and service areas. The applicant has shown a distribution of the space between retail area and service area and based the 57 parking stalls being provided on that distribution of the building area. Therefore, the applicant's compromise seems reasonable. 3. Mitigation of impacts to surrounding properties and uses; The applicant is proposing to provide a storm water system on-site that will treat the storm runoff prior to its release into the existing off-site storm water system. The proposed system includes a biofiltration swale, catch basins, and underground storm water detention pipes. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan that provides only a seeded lawn area and trees for landscaping. The inclusion of shrubs and/or a berm especially in the area adjacent to the parking spaces or subject to the movement of vehicles would soften the appearance of the site. City staff recommend that a condition of approval be established requiring the applicant to submit a revised landscaping plan to the satisfaction of the Development Services Division. 4. Mitigation of impacts of the proposed site plan to the site; The single story building will be located in the center of the project site. This will allow all sides of the building to be exposed to the natural sunlight and air. The applicant has shown that all of the area that is not being used for access or the building will be landscaped. ERCRPT.DOC City,of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report Sol CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page 8 of 10 5. Conservation of area-wide property values; The development of the vacant piece of property will help to maintain or improve the area wide property values. 6. Safety and efficiency of vehicle and pedestrian circulation; The applicant has developed a circulation system that circles the proposed building and access both SW Grady Way and SW 10th Street from on-site driveways and through a joint access from the adjacent property to the East. Pedestrian walkways have been designed into the project that will connect the proposed building with the existing sidewalks along SW Grady Way and SW 10th Street. 7. Provision of adequate light and air; As noted above, the single story building is located in the center of the subject property. All sides of the building will be exposed to natural light and the movement of air. None of the buildings in the adjacent area are of a size that would cast a shadow over this site for long periods of the day. 8. Mitigation of noise, odors and other harmful or unhealthy conditions; Ii Potentially hazardous materials could be stored in this building that would be used in the servicing or repairing of vehicles. The Fire Prevention Bureau has already notified the applicant of the Code requirements for the storage of hazardous materials. Noise may be generated from the repairing and services of vehicles. The applicant will need to ensure that the building is constructed in a manner that the noise generated will not violate existing City ordinance. It is not anticipated by staff that noise will be an issue on this site due to the industrial nature of the area and the separation between the proposed building and existing buildings on adjacent lots. 9. Availability of public services and facilities to accommodate the proposed use;and Adequate public service exist in order to accommodate the proposed use. 10. Prevention of neighborhood deterioration and blight. The development and maintenance of this will help to prevent neighborhood deterioration or blight. D. Further Considerations The property lines shown on this site plan are based upon a Lot Line Adjustment that was submitted to the City of Renton on September 17, 1997. The Lot Line Adjustment will need to be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. XX Copies of all Review Comments are contained in the Official File. Copies of all Review Comments are attached to this report. ERCRPT.DOC City-of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E nmental Review Committee Staff Report . 501 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page 9 of 10 D. Findings, Conclusions & Decision Having reviewed the written record in the matter, the City now enters the following: 1) Request: The Applicant has requested Environmental Review and Site Plan Approval for the construction of a 15,000 square foot building to be used for auto service and repair, and for the sale of auto accessories and parts. 2) Environmental Review: The applicant's file containing the application, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) documentation, the comments from various City departments, the public notices requesting citizen comment, and other pertinent documents was entered as Exhibit No. 1. 3) Site Plan Review: The applicant's site plan application complies with the requirements for information for site plan review. The applicant's site plan and other project drawings are entered as Exhibits No. 2 thru 5. 4) Comprehensive Plan: The subject proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley. 5) Zoning: The Conditional Use as presented, complies with the zoning requirements and development standards of the Commercial Arterial (CA) Zoning designation. 6) Existing Land Use: Land uses surrounding the subject site include: North: industrial; East: auto mall; South: commercial/industrial and West: commercial/industrial. E. Conclusions 1) The subject proposal complies with the policies and codes of the City of Renton. 2) The proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation of Employment Area - Valley; and the Zoning designation of Commercial Arterial. F. Decision The Site Plan for 501 Center Project, File No. LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions. CONDITIONS: 1. ,The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that demonstrates a combination of shrubs and ground cover or an earthen berm along both street frontages. The revised landscape plan shall be submitted with the application for building permits. 2. The applicant shall record the proposed Lot Line Adjustment (LUA-97-139,LLA) prior to the issuance of building permits. ERCRPT.DOC City of Renton PB/PW Department Administrative Site Plan Approval&E ,nmental Review Committee Staff Report S01 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97 127,SA A,ECF REPORT AND DECISION OF SEPTEMBER 23,1997 Page 10 of 10 EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION ON LAND USE ACTION: September 29, 1997 SIGNATURES: k)&*(1U Gr/t/VI 4oi i w> Hu vt s ovl s-rp 2.3 1 g q 7 James C.Hanson,Zoning Administrator date Michael D.Kattermann,Zoning Administrator date TRANSMITTED this 24th day of September, 1997 to the applicant and owner: John C. Radovich 2000 124th Avenue NE, B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 TRANSMITTED this 24th day of September, 1997 to the parties of record: None TRANSMITTED this 24th day of September, 1997 to the following: Larry Meckling,Building Official Art Larson,Fire Prevention Neil Watts,Public Works Division Lawrence J.Warren,City Attorney South County Journal ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Determination Comment Process Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination, then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Environmental Determination and Land Use Decision Appeal Process Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. ERCRPT.DOC r '-RENTO Ei.24.2 -3 ( T N 1 .: 4 ;" ^: 1. - --SW.--:-'7TH. -ST.- ess," it .-* ;--'..- - - ... , .__._. ._o._._. • ;1 TRACT'e 't`'''-1II rr , 3 c o • ^I 'G 't L1 `-3_,2 wat, . ..Y a 1 39.85 Acre = 4. l r!'".� . S Q I:1".:.:.,;:'1,1.'i' • NGTON • Gortl Lot t •. N'` a P i I_ % x, M• , °:. moo irS 38201Acres 1 $ T E C N ''. - 1' '' ' �' e; m , • INDUSTRI "',:. - s 'i___ d� of Y Zet . a PARK NO.I 3' ..`Ir o 0. a /• / 1,: CEN `,,E R I R 4 . i ;..- z� ' I \ Q IOrR 5' -ohr�a NrpY ,,Y-�(P�iye1 ^ Z..._�\�-.- \.E • II ! m "° Sµ•• •k°o'"` Rp y sy� M� j,��l �^z, 0 eW �o W'e.. ! a�a9 alv ! n 1.1 I •SW IorHrt. 5- a�,.'•. Al* l lip 4,F A/ 5., ro r ie J:I � '{ �'nO, 1 l \ _„r I v. :>s}x+,"s r•s.x :!v!m�a ri.,�Iu "' IZr• 11'i• , u•6'b n . 1/'•+ '• \.. \ `i\. .. -^-�..- � ,�. &&a a "vy S W.' lylll\ls1sy11'1 3 ddd ,}twYl + . '\, ¢''�. ' - Y r,I e� ' ,nn.Yup' �" 5=z;j?,.i a' ,.a ".'u`7 I� NIP y�• II lI�I i�11J1"3',":L,°,a Yb'-' i1 • ° 5 . �, _-1 r �, GRPt)Y - r ��°'�''L's b 71�wnl"!11 8•' -0 3 rle nb.•^}m O• 'al°• �a ...ail i lye;r: :1 rear"ml •I a "g+:%' N' ... m}}',} 13TH xy gout R e n `, ',..i, 1.1-r o } a I,j.v •".'.79 ,-win \ 7t g SW. • -7 Y, .. CEO }n,r1v ;rAV.,�li IJ" Ia^ I -..-l.�v Ir4: 1"°�'auz °u�a • - ..,...I j{! =, r� r1:mJ-LL- rt,��1^,.���' I ,1 �i. I ..a ,�. �' a - n} �:-- -1 :1 " a;-r �nI�Y' "na , , ter• Q .. a �+ fi I �JI a,.r.. x ,r r^ r rill.� I a � - 11 O ;.,..ceaw�9i1'��'. ..�st_ „•>:.v:aa �ag','n :.. � a7 !!1.Lrn:'. -• � •" I n t erch G n.g e _ NS7ATE'::Fi.W ., .e w r s t .'°_>.pp � ,. a* "'r IT.E13 �eJR•. _ e •,f "l n, t . 'c'O!!! ,•R__s.„ Q w �,5 v x R „. • \ 3 'SB+ a �_A •3�i67tffl,7447, i>_ _E" L G' tnwa • -F 1 11 a, e , mawscypui In T•L1 R+DrI�'. 9 �..r u_?' , 21 l P t y t 7 �����R r_ m}ur. C J m'I® � d l iw acA1a a i � � i ., "� i LF�16TH A K 3- ,. S.W. 16TH rt ---- ... y ,,,. ... _ le ice, s:- 1 Yr,4• -P"" \. L .1.'. Oo j !" . I, F ♦',�I', t1 li I i!, �J�}S( 7)�y�( - �, Yl1;i117iell1a1111i1 y1`iaiLi;1,11131 -1•r..�'�� I'll' !{ a u:e ,1 e`u + 1J�1n�5� \" _;:rr�MlEi R'U_niS"'�. / _.�_ _G« ti~ --1 IZ..............._ ' 1 I: •\ ..=ki--U y - -- p `t u, i 21 ,., 1 _ _ •'^ - :,_:_�:`•;;' :+'•0 1 II4{! v_ f''�-yi111 $j aTl....a� co P lal • 11��-•7ii l.�i�L`----�J \ Jr�c_I@• _ __�_y7��R_ y'I l21 171 :{Q `\I �!;L,--�d \ ;"'?,�r" U � iA'.°-i ., " 1•1s' • • III'', _ __I.a_ 4 ; I� YC—___—GGVr Lo;I bo-acr 'r'- - r'n .3Arr a , a S W 19TH ST. 1•. " a l> (1 d :It p _--1- 1'= crccc'7--___-_ i' ar',,_ �51 -- • Goal Lot 13 1 "a _my . u .' �I'� 27.36 Acres .I u1,' " w„e 1 -- r .rl, -- 1TLA,_ a L ae s ''•--•-----_____!e Y = it '\. I a`, • 'lf. a _�D n':I —lnJ Z•• ~° {+ 11_, ' H ° 4r:1-�� =Ii !l�-I' 1 w.u-: n a,�n _, F'.i ' to �''�-^-� / 1 • '� R ., , I r:' Q / . 1 'I G _:1 µ.a'— -'Ti % _I�4 1 Oa"' 3 Si s - Z '' \t �-`�-��-y �-�--`-�� '1 NI I 'n "' Q 1 1-.___p--�. -1i7J [_ ] `I 1`I1 \ • �-..,.3 4_r._r� I 'I I ', ;;:-'--+u2,T_- tQgll, - ```dA O .I 0 Tar-___--,5,,2g .54 i'I-TI 1 I;a O.` x",4 S 4_„_r,_� ill !. v,Is �E;";__-_ -'erl,,_--_I ,- t9 -- - - if1 4.,�.-ter 4�-..:-.r ..e. u, �' ' `I 1• •I •'nas� w.0 dJ f—�" 4, "r=—u r' I3 '1' !-a,L'� '.A ._ . ��-t�:.l- "NI 0 u'.,iSP, 5 r°4 u } .m 1 I Q -__ - ' `' . ."' __.-._._._._. _._._ ___-.S1Kr.;r ZYBR-:__. _.___, A_r of . ```LEGEND - 1 _%WI ATLAS CF SEATTLE• eta — IA ATLAS OF SEATTLE LEGEND -w�..wa s..•.w u�n,..s' 'm"��:.'� �.."I�"3�""-" ec.c•„Max� "nou■w eowvariv.INC E aenrrLE ,..,.w.:.,n....ae,....« \ �' • ...•.s,"�bo7,., • • _ _ _ _ S.W. 10th STREET GV 5T.neer 1•100r0•430 e'a •}FOND e'a G[nnNS rn¢ uaSme•POST met vALLr �cumnuneu>toewu �wSnra SOBS / OArdeVRCIrrJDmV•LK /' . uexr ervo vm uan mA)oAam / ( I I I I I <' I l l l l f l I I C l l I I°I rt: / MMUS . t ee 1 li y armeC l :ti NO T...Or :a ` 040404LT ►�S n'e A 4 i T. •PAV�TO n r8�e��¢ x ni _ NA: pFA 117 • ..y. ' I .; . _ -� l, . f/j4i _ w QbmoU Oe.oLOT I,. �I I m A A A A ' A A I? , I.�11 A A A /1 A : £ v I b _1 1.z T eo, 0 ILI /� h IY 6.1 R / III t o\ Q `wenlu a r� 1° u L -I �I — s I 0_rwa'aaN°roLe 1 y _ — ran VAULTW . 1...i- I 5 e 7 C -••• 10 L ..,.....,.., kr, R I i J •n - - - - - - — s _ 1. I �. O'Im09. 1 T•d ' LOGAnaI Or IDI meg ` RD Qrr9l•2 I rROrOr Y LV! Q ee 1 1 1 1 1 I `I\11 `exunwe e'o- wSnNS h( SITE 9 0.1m/ I K wema rrcre.D Lne TON SOW➢m S.W.GRADY WAY _ N C S 1 N w SITE DATA j I `\` (/'/ 1� —Sne Same. cA-ARTI UAL COMQOLAL ORIVE WAY -i DRIVE WAY cU'. .iaie MCA. eS,.SO tX ewr ACRtl7 1— 7 Q o=lIILO•k!ARlA(rarAu naaS xI NOTE:To SE CONFIRMED I aALLON.lIL QRDIIL•1enMf ..,o ;, "" III.SIo-__ AREAI0 • .j. ��,r•arOSeO eulvnn loan D+'o-wx y 9� / 2.NAMiAL VEGITATION AREA(2%) N�n�5ERIA0c n'a KR I , I 7.INTERIOR LANDSLAPINB I PA NINO (WOO STALLS OO x) I Q - . • N TOrALIU rROI1OCD. •T STALLS nO STALLSRR iror) (1)ne W =JOI CENTER SITE FLANo U .A•TJr ertflrnn FWD."LOT LAIOSUd He ASS. T)SPA=(455405:1 ' RAINf.1p SHEET NO. TOTAL WO5(MINI. 110 0 Sr. ALL O110•LM0000A•T T TOO Sr. LEGAL DESCRIPTION.PLAT LOT 9 < cv CC — ST pACCEEDIELL�1-T RENTON SHORT NO. DIO5149007 - GOIALT 0.40-n M N TAX LOT No. 19290540E 407 W NONIN MAP _ '- U. Or• S G1,E:.j_i• -• .roe N0. 97105.00 • ill 1 ;- I I 9`E i�°it al 0 17. CCZ Q li 0 • U d mR moo• W, .0 0 0 0 0 . 6 0 0 .0 CO) II ft 3 0' Z 30' Q J _ a_ im • i O o O o I O ® O L. Z -- . wO " "- TENANT I TENANT I TENANT 2 TENANT 2 TENANT 2 TENANT 3 TENANT 3 0 ---- 2250 SF 3000 SF 1500 SF 1500 SF 1500 SF 3000 SF 2250 SF F RETAIL/OFFICE SERVICE BAY AREA SERVICE BAYS RETAIL/OFFICE SERVICE BAYS SERVICE BAY AREA RETAIL/OFFICE p .I AREA CS BAYS m 15'X 25') (S BAYS B AREA (S BAYS o (S BAYS 0 15'X 25') AREA ..�- 15'X 25') 15'X 25'1 I - I e O0 0 0 0 I G > I® ' =-- e 3 . • _ ., „. m., , . a m 300' a o• 0 _ co 0 Z Z KEYNOTES ® LEGEND " . OFLOOR PLAN —• W _ I. 12'-0'X 12'-0'OVERHEAD DOOR a w 4:.,. i5'.0'X 12'-0'OVERHEAD DOOR 0 BUILDING STRUCTURAL GRIDLINE I-z FRONT DOOR "_/ ,'o".21?Y�R)3'-0'X Y-0'SO'SSTOREFRONT DOORS KEYNOTE DESIGNATION 5: STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM 6:'CONCRETE SIDEWALK/LANDING,1. lyANTER/LANDSCAPE AREA ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDWO SYSTEM i .. '^t i .'IgIE OF CANOPY/ROOF ABOVE sm IC. METAL PERSONNEL DOOR q -2 • • . _.___i_i____ .„ , ,, (1 II 10 T O O O O 4 O O O �!llf11 I'i i . ,.. 2 1 L FI::1� 1 1 �" Z, _ 0�rmw F. -r i I I I_ 1�' ,a ¢.00.2113 _ •o / l - - - - • ® " 4 U3i ()NORTH ELEVATION �0 A B C C B W I cc .. ■__I■-_■_■ li1I1 1=1hl. \ m �:u:t: �:�::::l'± — o � ' F. W 0EA5T ELEVATION O LEST ELEVATION w ilrIRIPL, T T T (i) (i) (i--) T 0 0 e 0 0 e.m. _TENANT 51GNAGE AREA I r 1 I O TENANT SIGNAGE AREA O � ,014•410 DINWLPF11f--5I H h4--- — SIGNAGE — —_ _ _ O n` 6 1 .., i. -4-C.> - ■ _- Y t u F u 050UTN ELEVATION 0 OO O 0 KEY NOTES C. - I. 12'-0'X 12.-0'OVERHEAD DOOR - 2. 9'-0'X 12'-0'OVERHEAD DOOR 3. 3'-0'X 1'-0'STOREFRONT DOOR 4. (PRI 3'-0'X l'-0'STOREFRONT DOORS 5. PAINTED CONCREE WALL PANEL ¢ - 6. PAINTED STUCCO/DRYVIT FASCIA LL i..-i 1 .';I l i. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM • 8. PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING 9.PREFINISHED STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING 10. PAINTED AGENT BAND 55'WIDTH • II. STUCCO/CONCRETE PANEL 3/4'SCORELINE s .,on Pi: • ]l'`i• A-3 0,3 • :. -. - M. , .. a 9710000 / I... • • ' . • . . . . . • . . ' . • _ _ PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE AND TREE PLAN .-----_ --__ i.:,...--:.--_-..---,-- rl 7 rn.,o C ,.1,,,,,41, 1.1,UV) -!...0” 1...20. SEED Lowi SOUTHWEST 10th STREET ....•). 406,,, Iv. -"-',;)_ ) 1 ' , ) ) ( ) '• ) .h , • ; ,.-r, -)--::i, ''I 1 'tt.....,... , ,., i -.Ilk'.;... . fi• i-- --01,e fF,,-7,s.--- --r,••-.1:;,..,--....,---,, - .: i......"-. --------- -------q,-,-‘-• MLR WOK" . 'I:1.!.,,:.....,:.itti 0 I ,• ± 13 Ga.; .. /", /;''''po=i 21, ... • .....9,8 •••. '''"' i I . • 1 g i_...k..=... ...0_2:41,1_,.-4t_. :._-..••••••.-;,.-, A.-_....,....,.. ,-.N.a - : •.; , (I) liiiik 1. ,.___4.1. •. '.' 22 a ..•••1_4.4 . _. 494 .‹.-((,.. '--- I i I'4'1?I . ./l'Orrt jos g I • ; ,4•4-7-\ 1.1.1 ? '0' er .... •-- . e " -- ' It /.6.:7i.t., i "Fr% •'-ir%'1, Prl v v v ..,*'' v v 17-1-'417 ,/ - v v v ..rmr, , ,,,,vdrl-. . . . oi , ___q \ 2 1102 f..'ERçNn_t'-'"---1 ') (-• I I 1 ' ' 71 ,7,'; _ I i P -I • . -,:-(' I , 't,.." '-i .... .., kg,II---(2- "C.. i PROPOSED BULDING !.. • , ,,i'i • ,:--NATIVE1- .,1 I I FF.-23.0 I .1 i i/ . .... i'=' I''"'" f!,i'-- 11 I- TPN l', .• i (r;'_c,...t .Ec.,. I I,.:,....... I•• A il'''' I, W 0 I r.E..., •0.,.,=2". I , , 4 I P., • • .2' ,,i3vuAFZI TO.1..BE ROAMED DORM-.--\I .... i i! 1/4,-, 11._. I rri.L. -.4,1 I ( ,..I..„:, .,.." I...t. ..../....1._• ..)' .';', ,I 'IA . • Hi THT.-.7,'ITTL" '‘,. 'ig.„:,wo •'-..... -411"430 I I. ,...' r I / P. J ___, tf, : • .,,,: litl,....4.,,,,,C1 '0 I - A. ,r f6,111 1 . ,. . 1 I ps.._ ___i - to ,,,..,-..',,xcJI-1-3 /,4711.`gf„1400A A riA ib,A .„.7- I- ) /I ii • n.,-;.:. ••.,r..3.., ..,...., $,'- ,,,„ -90 N • , 7./IIL--ii.L,„... --' '&0 ww ..... =5' 1] i -,--,k_k .7, '' • ; i. . 1 i . l! . ci g.4, ss G. _... - Ice V 12 50 3E_ _, = _t_arLik- W, 1- 4. ° . L‘---. Z _----.), 2,r••••..c..r.?.- _.r- ."-.-.-4-"--- _--- 4- 1 2tq, V; - \_ "" "...p";''4___„,11.' - i t \ W rD eT:._„: 2:..... 1i III \ ..,... 9i an -------- • .„--. •,-'---. _...._.-----------' i .1.... I ...t.4,.. ,-,,,. 1 .c•,-...044 w.,,,,-3 vw-k •-'"' ' - -'j.----.'---------' •., , ..• ,. •:., F',",i• .rc I. .r...' ' ', ,n,\JoirbViA...vi,----_-_•-•,__._ „,..,'z_ . ..- - --- . . f "I'D E:A. 1 ' disirl z .8 n . _,..,n 110* ,•.. CC ..... .... ._'- n ;IS _Tint- •4".. .1_!...-_-1..__L-7..W.-..7_ .. , II_'.. Itip,te. .antr eV::( . . WAR 10.91TAT 'atiTA*0440.111EM 11,9.6r ,E.,,,,,,, la 11, ,14.3,..:1 I i';•,' .". MO• 444P241.41 Irtill ,,-/.r IN' igur '..41/.,iftty• ti:.1476140" 1 r '`°1-.'""---------. ... -. fikt•ot 1 tr,..14, -..:,.f,.,_ . i ,'r,• - ,,,r. i•-T, VI, ' '.1”ar---.•:-.-.- . ..-----''':-.1.- _r----. - '''' te.ng„,403.t01114,41 10 ,,, 0.,21 i Ilt •'.. ''''''. r,..1-ao...ery 4: 0 . ,... w --) . D. 17.5 ',.1......_,Ld,•,.4,44, I..5 pf an, ct di n PUGET SOUND NATIVE PLANTS SOUTHWEST GRADY WAY PLANT LJST wc..”.r 153,"0,ACTi[7.1 P Srem MBE SIZE CONDOM SR.. OUANTITV REMARKS NuiE SVE CONDMON SPACING ODANOTT ROOMS 11 --- --- TREES: 1REES:ACM CIPCRIAINI/ e•-5.XL B•B AS SM. 5 LOLTI-SMI.3-5 TRIMS (0.110.1.orooan./ 1.75.CAL. B•If OS SMOIN D SLAT AND CUT COI CR011111D SEA5C41.14OL: 8 VINE KNIE , t OBEET Coy RAISER(MORN VON STREET MEE 1.15E.,15-rOOT STANDARD 0 N. 1.5.GAL II t D CO 1.3 VAN 2 ,.,..1 S1ME AND 0.11 DO ORMOND SEASON....i BRUM scoout/TA 1011.IIN/ 1.75.CV. CCC /s,„.von. lo soul AM112 CUT C•afsEa=SagS01sSa..tic..... V 8 g OREG.'. / CORN101 i''; V2IFF'2. 11 . .1,.......,,,..=........., .1.5.04,••.0 de B INI• AS SNOW/ 2 SURF.ANDOR07194C 41/ _, .. HMO 4 VV.COVO/CR'i -.. 1r-24. OIVAIRIEIOS .4.15'".43 .-1 1431.0 S FROY1a0132S,.,_.,,,,,„, . P.g iZq's g i" • ',. . 0:i;.. ''r' .,,,,2',"- . (..5:. •r..,, . :2 o •Z-eq..• i,y• .1.,..„ °I e . 0 JUNOVITS CNN PrOZERAN4 NASA'/ 15.-to. cam. e-5. 54 MD I'INU19.,B.AAN, : .. 00S CONTORTA CONTORTA/ COO. B•B AS SVC. 4 SURE AND ON ONE.GROBlAt St .- ----- SNORE 9•94 /. 1-1.' li, 110.1C1OTRIC/1011 504PERVIIENS/ . EtUE OAT CRASS 1 OIlleN rs snot. 9 PSEUDOOSLICA TAX60l14/ / ,4 ,04.. 'O ,,,, PROWS VORODERASUS•01TO(none le-24. o•e 3' . IMO 3.room FORMS , ... ', I W OTTO M.VEREL -.....6 .otarck,... e•III. CCI AS SWOON 5 STARE 0N9 CUT CUL CROWNO SEArN .. ". ....'.-'...' GROOM COVER . 94g• 1r fiD le 0 tkErer.weernoess wooer/ L.,444.1 : 22 no 2.MY BORERS so ODER OPEC. X .0301113 mange/ 24.-30. BR OR 6. I RATER MAW/no 1VN.PlitTRIC RECCUIENDED 0_, ! 4 I SOD VOX tom colecreae.two 432., eeiew.O.CrOULY/ . ir-or owence A'-o• 24 4 COOS WOO.;ICED e mem mews I am Lowe moo worm soo ei soon oF - ...•'.. ....... no -0 couotit cuusareees 4o:ow:my 24.-30. Ea ce r 4 OMR OLLNITI MOE NINTER/PlANTDC RECC46NOCED ......„ ---....... VaN/PLANI.EN 114X-CUT TRANSOM WAPONGTON(2 REasiVED CRY OF REN1TON u, 0 • .. ,,-... ".:-....0 r.. sow,Rim COMM TECV (0 oeme.n-rweemr OP 14,131-40 WORK. AS NOTED CATIALr'i I • I' ,'..1 4 I. • nem PVIOND AMR INSTALVT01 / CS SOW%IDDROMPUS/ I I I I / C VNeOrfrdinrarroND Z IS NOTED 51011-011ATM MUM. ...•,,..ii. ARCM musts/ I ',1., ''''' I -Doe V./.7___ F.... M .scoo ruse II Pp. • • • tq - . • CI ....„,. „, „mg,' „r„ O2001EI3---_,..„„.„...,, „,PL1 , 5 2 nr.4e0(e.,po.I4,....,08/20/12W7 21.28 s"0.-e-oo e......eeoeet.--er moso-e.00so-m000so-moecooeor. ..,. - . • • -• . . . . - • ' . • . - . • . . • . • . . .. ' • . . • • • • e.veer.n.... _ erne 501 CENTERi „ ,E COVER SHEET A PORTION OF SECTION 19,TWP.23N,ROE.5E,WM 0 y O RENTON.WASHNGTON 3 CT co VICMY MAP O , I rG •• r - ----P 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF RECORD 2 '--4----- ( tAeeican 31)c.Cnnpw 0 -a- li ..P No.3J5095 -- - - - --T_-.�, -,.T -- - - -- - - me land rele.,.d w x ula commitment situated a lee alone F • VV �tJ{Jlfli EST 1�111 �I� Iel Washington.County of Ring and Is do>aed a.faro..: i �'i'i c-":._� Teat part.of Ue Bur egton Noah.Mee former 120 feel --i e A wide Right of Way N Government Let 2 and the Fractional ' / J or- •-. South..Ouarin of the Northwest Warta of lore Northwest tF1 f i l P f i l l L111!f �l !J G ater of Section TomY ip 23 shalt.Rorigp 5 Ew4 _ 1 I �(-.. _. = I W0a alto Meridian.N NN9 County.WashNglm described as Imo.. • ii ` I ••I • I I�f,L n ,T^ n' - I BEP CON�SMG at the Ygem..of the We.Me of Lbd Avenue, I( -'•- ''BUIL137441 4-LL - TT � j , ' u69 40 feet Welt meas..at right male.,talon whoa cantNne `` w 1 - - �- 0 Norot md bn he NNa my finely 3of said Northerly.ofy,Way. Nth al jn ! — ; 1 I If_. -� 'I light angles.hoer the centeMe of Grade o _ .LLE I F_XISTMG BUILDING { �', a I�q Thence southwesterly along said Nmuerly Me SOD feel: n •u� ' 3 �` w Al _ �l / Nance south,parallel with sold West line of End Avenue to I 5 i' . -��-�� t 1l -I i 1 •Q $wtherl line of said Rigel el Way, -4 — - - - •��• w L ............... .........................�F;'�/ Thence Northeasterly along Bald Southerly INe of said Right el i e •v �1 ( Way to sold West Me of Line Awnua ( —��_._ I , _-_ __ __ —71 r'•• m PARCEL II W 0''—E SOUT}WESTGAAD 'WY () NCO.ohe . ounty folio. O gras , bed�yNING at Way atlnnUi West tion moron to lNo AvenuegIn of S.Nwesl V 1t) 395 feet I !' WNth eestedy of right Oes Bto Southwest body Way.to O Nonce Southwerterly along the North M.D.of No M.N.. NadGradu ...-_.... ................1..._... -- _ ......._........ �..........._........... Ue Southerly eo the a urM91m tkrthem Rai Terht al ence Naataheast rly along the Southerly IS.of the Bw/N9lon Swithern Rosrmd Right of Coy to the West margin of Wd Avenu. ti V Nonce Sotherly along said West margin to the POINT OF BEGINBEGINNING.NN Situate In Sh the County of Mg.Slate of shington. 2 TOGETHER Lot J of City of Renton ort Not Na 135-e1 as 81 1 recorded undo Record.Na 8105149003.Records of qng Counts WwhNgtm, Situate M the County of Ring.Slate of Wash0gim. g S • 0 VERTICAL DATUM a£3 Ott OF RENTON MONUMENT 754-CONCRETE 6 j - YONUYENT Cl host AT INC M0ORSECRON OF m 6 SW TTH STREET AND SENECA AVENUE SW, ELEVATION:22J13 FEET(5.801 meters) is u n `mrym • METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION BASIS OF BEARING w„ry Not portion of Burlington Northern Ine.1 former 120 foot ride Rigel-el-Way M Government Lot 2 and FOUND ON SOTCRETEESTIDTMONUMENTS W CASE AS I gg 00 the Fraclbnal Southwest Quarter of Ina Northwest Mader of Ua Northwest Ouorler of Section 19, SHOWN ON SOUTHWEST 1DTH STREET AND as Tamshb 23 North,Range 5 East,Salanelle Mbim,In.0 Calmly,WaahMglon.described as fe0eex• RECORD WfORYANON ON SNORT PLAT N0.BI051{900J m`o '2�_ Cemmmc al the Intersection of Southwest bed Nonce?forth'11-18'30-East den m loir 160.5etvq,'t9 R sue4351�-90.009 -YW-�-J Mq y g sob Northwest:HY Way and LM Avenue Southwest.Bald MterseclNn Right-of-Way Me,a Oita.of 2.27 feet 10 a line • 1.Ng a monument N a case, parallel wilt Ue West Right-of-Way INe al said L. Ina.N0ln 0111124-East alma the cmlerMe el Avenue SwUwesl; !-N 5 0{'/e acid LNd Avenue Southwest o distance of 51.47 fool Nonce North 0111'24-Ea.alma sold pa dlel Me, y e Aar -roars to the Northeasterly eslenfwn el the NorU.aslely a diatoms of 123.54 feel to the SouNeoslerly Right- J Y ` CR. Right-of-Way Iona of told Swthweet Grady Way, oNWay IMe al SauUwest 10th Street: Q ' \ c South 771821-West dap said Nee..slerly Nonce North NZ 30'E.along said ScoNeaslerly . _ ® eaten .a diatoms of 41.17 feel to Ina West Right- ight-of-Woy IMe,a distance of 400.00 feel to tab to • oNWay INe of Lind Avenue Southwest one the TRUE West Rlyhl-of-Way line of Lind Avenue Southwest: 0/� \+ cum-\\ % • A POINT Of°EONNMP Noce South 0111124-V.t clang sole West Right- V SECeW v / _ Y Nance South yT[BY9-We.dm9 sold Nmthweeterly of-Way IMe.a dlatmce of 17527 feet la Um TRUE ( b V• Right-of-Way line of Sauthnat body Way,a distance of POINT Of BEPNNMG ,(�, ♦k ` 8 s Ow eav Nero.North 12'J1'39'West,a distance of 50,03 feet y/�q f'.w� N -i-F A-A • w N.xaru.eslerly Rant-of-war M.of u.Puget senora L y` CITY OF RENTON SECTION ION se Paver and Light CanpmY Right-of-Way I.(formerly is v p,'14• oEPt sesweeras ON PUBLIC WORKS 8 - the Puget Sound Elect.Railway Rigel-of-Way line, 1,. Rmim Branch): .l w�pY LILLBc�a O 1 QWZgOriC) CO .- ;. .I-; I - {(1f tib I cream _-isms arrna- a ---gym .Q 'Zr asap •••• - - Lego — m Kam, n eon, 0sW ',,.,�_--..,,=.w......,_—_..er 1 2_ m ' row eol0P1.ceYR-eeyxynwe Its 1.....A sou... - norm ie0u_604m 2-as.:605lgn, PRELIMINARY GRADING, STORM DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN r„ s _ — r r„ • r z 1 ) u . i — — amfl195Oi.EIFxG 1a..•-.. .�. Z SOUTHWEST _ .. _ __-- mm. W f — f�. � ., _L_T-I'1" toff, --- _ � ctestu +,..... —_ N TT18']C E pq,y�]Nc 1,,,R----- . a. z ,� • �W• �� , y� n EL"—,Y sD � I.... • I \ 1 -" —.Ili— m�,.cn.x T U tY m \— _ — •— •zy — — _\ ' �/ y 1. _ a]] \b�xK '1 >I•1�Imo:■=. \ ---' d i ., I • s. r�' `a,34 ver .. �11rl'„ \ 'LI nil a IIIi��1161111 --. g r I -- I■� ,,, • , I I aq.w,\ ,iif,. ; I r. inrimil i „ PROPoso . I •31 1 I \ /S \ •::'ati I �I „ 11 I _"-- �11-.: ,. i1 LTIa H g s .. as,�, t.444c�Ah:. t. Sw nn T---1 �� 4,.A .. I ii • i (t..., �� �ua�l I / 11 7 VI�ST .I� „ ,o • Q O --\,) - - IIII w ,,...L. \ I 1 I o ,....1.. . .,,,,,1:0- CL ri ...:....... ]a. MCC M.SO iii IMS. 1100.11 4, � \ $pUT1iWEST CiADY WA N p .. Y2, Es,ns (x _ _ xnx y SEE COVER SHEET FOR 3 SECTION A-A rn' .-... ... . a • E9 6y % av _ „ I N . CtOvRNTON DI CITY ,e•,o wo,'aca to -=��® t .e. 2 s 2 0-0© = ca.n•^•o.na,.a, 1119 :<w s,.•.n 0.cE..c Yogis ,aos,-.,.: - .:m„-os.]msaP5,. • • . : ...... ......:> ......::»»<:::>:>::»»:» ettitiRENT`PLANNIN:»:CilyI�<«:>:::itin `gi> ': : on :': > > >y ''»' . <<> <><> On the �'' day of Seeteviel6tr , , 1997, I deposited in the mails of the United States, a sealed envelope containing ERC de:revtnnivi t16\n documents. This information was sent to: • Name Representing . Department of Ecology • • Don Hurter WSDOT KC Wastewater Treatment Division • Larry Fisher Washington Department of Fisheries I • David F. Dietzman Department of Natural Resources Shirley Lukhang Seattle Public Utilities Duwamish Indian Tribe Rod Malcom - • Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Rita Perstac Puget Power • (Signature of Sender) csUV ix. . k.. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) // I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that '*/bR4 7� i s��Ge-e,_ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be'his/her/their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. / /gyp Dated: g c! 9 7 • Ake, �s�t h/ `;��‘‘SvM is) Notary lic in an or the State of Wash' -s=""�• ' ; e'!a Notary Tint) (U4ARGARET J. My appointment expe 4's,'-- • Project Name: Sol Cev-ter i i ea Project Number: Wlk•91 . 171,SR -t4 ‘E4 NOTARY.DOC CITE OF RENTON Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator September 24, 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Review Section • PO Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Subject: Environmental Determinations 1 . Transmitted herewith is a copy of the Environmental Determination and Environmental Checklist for the following project reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on September 23, 1997: DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE-MITIGATED 501 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF The John C. Radovich Development Company is proposing to build a 15,000 square foot commercial structure on a 50,500 square foot site. The land is currently vacant except for a billboard. The planned use for the structure is auto retail (repair, service, and sale of related parts and accessories). The site will provide 57 parking stalls with access from SW 10th Street and SW Grady Way. Location: 501 SW 10th Street. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments.After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680]and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. If you have questions, please call me at (425)277-5586. For the Environmental Review Committee, Az-5v Mark R. P ICP Project ger cc: King County Water Pollution Control Division, Metro Larry Fisher, Department of Fisheries David F. Dietzman, Department of Natural Resources Don Hurter, Department of Transportation Shirley Lukhang, Seattle Public.Utilities Duwamish Tribal Office Rod Malcom,Fisheries, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe(Ordinance) Rita Perstac, Puget Power AGNCYLTRDOE\ 200 Mill Avenue South -Renton, Washington 98055 • :CIT�rET-RENTON :.LL ; ., Planning/Building/Public Works Department "1 Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator Jesse Tanner,Mayor • - ' .. . September 24, 1997 Ms: Rebecca Davidson': - .: _ ' - - John C. Radovich Development Company • : . - . 2000= 124th.Avenue NE, B=103 • Bellevue,Wa 98005 ' SUBJECT: : : 501 Center Project:. : : • • - Project No..LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF :••.: :• Dear Ms. Davidson::::;. . . This letter is written:on behalf of.the Environmental Review,Committee (ERC) and the Zoning'Administrator have completed their review of the subject project The..ERC,=on September 23, 1997,,•issued.a threshold Determination of Non-Significance-Mitigated with Mitigation:Measures. `See-the:enclosed•,Mitigation`Measures document. The Zon_ing _Administrator, on:September_23,-:1997,;approved.the:Site Plan with conditions. .Please refer•to the staff report and :a'e ision��enclosed.'d c " - y '.'Comments:regarding the environmental determination must be filed in Writing on or.before.5:00 PM October 13, ;:• 1997 ='Any.aggrieved person feeling that the-:environmental.'determination`of the:Environmental Review:Committee is based on.erroneous"procedure,-errors of law.or>fact,:error in.judgment,or;the discovery;of new,evidence that could not :•be'reasonablyavailableat the time of:the determination may submit written comments,After review of the-comments, if, the Environmental Review:Committee finds there is;not sufficient,evidence'to,:amend its_original;determination,-then .there will be:no further extension of the apppal period Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a`: '-format appeal within the:original 15=day.timeframe W mm ritten coents f.nust',�be:filed:with: "Jana Huerter, Land_Use Review Supervisor;City:of Renton Development Services Division,.200:Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. : • Appeals of either the environmental,determination [RCW.43.21.0075(3),=WAC .197-11-680] and/or the land use ., . decision must be filed in writing on or.before 0:00 OM October 13, 1:997. ; If no appeals are -fled•,by this date,,both'"actions'will become.fnal.;';`Appeals'must be filed in writing together with _the- ;required $75.00 application fee with:Hearing:Examiner, City:of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South,.Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner.are governed by City of.Renton Municipal:Code Section'4-8-11 B. :Additional.information :regarding the appeal process-may be obtained,from the`Renton"City Cleric's Office,(425)-235-2501. - The preceding information will assist you in planning for implementation of your project and enable you to exercise your : appeal rights more fully,if you choose to do so. If you.have anquestions or desire clarification:of the above, please call me et(425)277-5586. y q , For the Environmental Review Committee, AICP M P1 ro'ect M. aer 9 o is /Owner Joh nC Rad vi h e SMLTR.DO • 200•Mill AvenueSouth` Rentori•.Washin ton 98055 ." Thisr contains 50/recycled material.20/Post consumer •. .' ... . ,.. Pape � ° ecya ° G ,.' .- :'. .... . CITY.OF RENTON : _:' • DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) MITIGATION MEASURES AND CONDITIONS • • APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-9E7-127,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: John C.Radovich - PROJECT NAME: 501 Center Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The John C. Radovich Development Company is proposing to build a 15,000 square foot commercial structure on a 50,500 square foot site. The land is currently vacant except for a billboard. The planned use for the structure is auto retail(repair,service,and sale of related parts and accessories). The site will provideA57 parking stalls with access from SW 10th Street _. - and SW Grady Way . ;. . : .... LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 SN 10th Street MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. The applicant shall submit a Fire Mitigation Fee of$0.62 per square foot of building !" • area. .This fee shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. (Estimate: 0.52 X 15,000 sf 2. The applicant shall submit a TransportationyMitigation Fee of$7.5.00 per trip generated prior to the issuance of building permits. (Estimate- 220 daily trips X$75 $16,500) j - The Site Plan for'501 Center Project, File`No..LUA_-97-127,SA-A,ECF, is approved subject to the following conditions.• "``_' CONDITIONS: I 1....The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan that demonstrates a combination of. shrubs and ground cover or an earthen berm along both street frontages. The revised _ - landscape plan shall be submitted with the application for building permits. 2. • The applicant shall record the proposed Lot Line Adjustment(LUA-97-139,LLA) prior to the.. issuance of building permits. • CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE - (MITIGATED) • - ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF ' APPLICANT: , ' . : John C. Radovich , PROJECTNAME: 501 Center Project '. : - • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL The John C.Radovich Development Company is proposing to build a• 15,000 square foot commercial structure on a 50,500 square foot site.-The land is currently vacant except for a billboard. The planned Use for the structure is:auto retail (repair, service, and sale of related parts and • accessories). The site will provide 57 parking stalls with access from SW.10thStreet and SW Grady Way. • LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: ; 501 SW loth Street • Advisory:Notes to Applicant: • ;i.• The following notes are supplemental Information provided in conjunction with the :: environmental determination.(Because:these'notes are provided as i nformation only, they are ' • _ ' =not subject to the appeal process for environmenfal"determinations: • General Comments ,,,s. : , 1.r;,Garbage and recyclable'deposit areas and collection°Points shall bp easily and safely accessible to' , .'• :hauling trucks. • ;: . 2. Underground or above- •round storage"tanks':are-shown on'this'site`plan If storage tanks are '- :required in the future,_separate•.permits:and;environmental review:may be required. The applicant/landowner will need to check for the required pernlitS with both the Development Services: f: Division and the Fire Prevention Bureau ' $: ;:` - Surface Water Utility ;: :w>; , drainage .:- 9 y •.;. p ., ry eroson,confro �~,,' �: :.' .:,:',` •' . - - • , . '' :. 3.' The draina e s stem and tern ora l••plans for the:site shall be-designed in :'. - accordance with the"1990 KCSWDMas adopted by'the,City'of Renton. Storm drainage (SDC) fees.: • of$0.129/sq. ft. on new impervious:surface installed on the site by the project will be required. .: • :'Waste Water`Utility 'I' . . : 4. -The site is adjacent to Metro east side trunk line and connection would be permitted through a new I City manhole on-site (with:back-flow device) if the building F.F. level is below 25 foot elevation, Side .; sewer connection permit will cost.$100. .Sanitary sewer(SDC)fees of:$0.078/sq.ft. of gross area of :.--: -. • . ; the site is required. : Water Utility, • " - 5. All new water mains, fire hydrants,and DDCVassembly(building fire control:system) needed to • protect the proposed on-site building will be required to meet current Fire.Codes/Regulations:.Any new main, fire,hydrants, orDDCV'vault located on private property will be required to.be in • easements•that will be held•by the City of Renton: Water(SDC) fees of.$0.113/sq. ft. of gross area -- - :i' of the site is re uired:•: . Trans ortatron - - P - • 's'6: :New sidewalks will be:required on SW 0th sti.vet.:'- kny •proposed driveways to servethe-site will be • j . :installed per City Codes/Standards and locations approved by the Transportation Engineering `:',.• 1- :Section 'A traffic study will be required to provide average daily trip generation in/out of the site. 501 Center Project LUA-97-12 I,SA-A,ECF Page 2 1 _ Fire Prevention Bureau 7. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,500 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and two fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. - • . 8. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 9. . Applicant shall complete a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous material. Separate plans and permits are required for the ' • installation of any aboveground or underground storage tanks..: 10. Turning radius requirements for fire apparatus is 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside. Applicant shall ' ' modify sidewalks and curbs to meet this requirement. :' Construction Services : . 11. One hour exterior wall construction with parapet at east wall (less than 20 feet from property line)with protected openings is required. No openings less than five feet are allowed. - • 12. Limitation on projections is covered by Sec. 503, 1/3 distance to center line where openings require protection. _ 13.Auto repair shops require floor drains to oil/water.separator. . Airport Manager • w° =. :_ ' 14. The approval of this project andl the issuance`of building permits shall constitute the determination , . . • that the project is compatible with the;operation of the airport'and the flight of all types of aircraft. over this site i - ' : :15. If construction height are in excess if a 100:1,;slope,from the`runway centerline, a Notice of Proposed. .. Construction is required, unless the structure is obviously'shielded by existing structures.--The , - `information provided does not address shielding and height of the,,proposed structure above sea level.` -The applicant will need to work with,the Airport Manager in making this determination:', 16. The applicant shall not construct lighting'which causes glare or other,interference with the.landing or' operation of aircraft from the airport:`'(City of Renton:Code4-31-17) Communit Services _ ' 17.All landscaped areas outside of the subject property.is to be maintained by the adjacent landowner. .-. ' 18. We do not recommend Western Cedars on the west.property line to be located on the property line • 'due to the spreading growth habit of.these,trees. ;: .:• : Police Department `-' '`; • • -2 . . • 19. Based upon the size of the building, 7,76 calls for service are anticipated annually. Actual number will probably be higher: SW10thStreet is located in an area of the City that has a'high commercial burglary, auto theft,and theft from vehicle report rate. ' 20. Recommend that building tools and materials be secured when not us use-especially during the '. construction phase of the project. The construction site should be fenced with portable fencing and : : .. be well lighted with security lighting.=This will,help reduce theft. • ,21:All exterior doors should be fitted with heavy-duty dead-bolt locks and a monitored security alarm is : • • • recommended., To help prevent thefts from park_ed vehicles,'and auto theft,the lot should be fenced in'and access prevented after hours by blocking both'entrances/exit areas:.' 22. Glass windows and doors should have an application of security`flm added, or be of a shatter resistant material. = Ir • ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: mil CENTER PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF The John C.Radovich Development Company Is pmposIng to build a 15,000 square foot commercial structure on a 50,500 square foot site.The land is currently vacant except for a billboard.The planned use for the stnicture Is auto retail(repair,service,and sale of related parts and accessories). The site • will provide 57 parking stalls with access from SW 10th Street and SW Grady Way. Location:501 SW 111111 Street. • THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE(ERC)HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT.AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. • COMMENTS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM OCTOBER 13,1997.ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON FEELING THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE IS BASED ON ERRONEOUS PROCEDURE,ERRORS OF LAW OR FACT, ERROR IN JUDGMENT,OR THE DISCOVERY OF NEW EVIDENCE THAT COULD NOT BE REASONABLY AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THE DETERMINATION MAY SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS.AFTER REVIEW OF THE COMMENTS,IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE FINDS THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO AMEND ITS ORIGINAL • DETERMINATION,THEN THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER EXTENSION OF THE APPEAL PERIOD.ANY PERSON • WISHING TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION WOULD NEED TO FILE A FORMAL APPEAL WITHIN THE ORIGINAL 15-DAY TIMEFRAME.WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE FILED WITH:JANA HUERTER,LAND USE REVIEW SUPERVISOR,CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION,200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH,RENTON,WA 98055. APPEALS OF EITHER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION[RCW 4321.0075(3),WAC 197.11-6801 ANDIOR THE • LAND USE DECISION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM OCTOBER 13,1997. IF NO APPEALS ARE FILED BY THIS DATE,BOTH ACTIONS WILL BECOME FINAL APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED$75.00 APPUCATION FEE WITH:HEARING EXAMINER,CITY OF RENTON, • 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH,RENTON,WA 98055.APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-11B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)-235-2501. • • � .I,lu !I i Ifk_: I• i iif • LJ c ( • .tip, '''''' '� j t4 • I ;'1° r t , am �' :•~ , 1/. Irk 1.1 1-• • .�' _ 1 —R'_1• ,G (fi11 [i • ao 1 Iti,.1.! 0o 1• • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION,PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION Please Include the project NUMBER when calling for proper file'Identtfieation. -CERTIFICATION • .I'l/rr /1' ,N,�In , hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted b me ' conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on • rj, ,,o .,. Se9tz'r rn'a ?S I°I 4 7 Signed: • ,./-A7V7 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING )certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that iri -_%/ 4/)l/1/.4l%/ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and voluq,tary'nti-dor the uses • and purposes mentioned in the instrument. •�, Dated: qJi/qi f -- NotaryPu c in and fo a StaEe of•Wdas itngion Notary (Print) ARGARETj ULLAR My appointment expireCOMMISSION EXPIRES 6/9/98 NO TAPtY,DOC , Imo. , ... t.,,:„Jk.:A.,:.,.?, ,,....)1:z.", ,......„0 .,:.:,: .,4,.,f..:..,: ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION POSTED TO NOTIFY INTERESTED PERSONS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION PROJECT NAME: 501 CENTER PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER: LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF The John C. Radovich Development Company is proposing to build a 15,000 square foot commercial structure on a 50,500 square foot site. The land is currently vacant except fora billboard. The planned use for the structure is auto retail (repair,service, and sale of related parts and accessories). The site will provide 57 parking stalls with access from SW 10th Street and SW Grady Way. Location: 501 SW • 10th Street. THE CITY OF RENTON ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) HAS DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT. AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. COMMENTS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM OCTOBER 13,1997. ANY AGGRIEVED PERSON FEELING THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE IS BASED ON ERRONEOUS PROCEDURE,ERRORS OF LAW OR FACT, , ERROR IN JUDGMENT,OR THE DISCOVERY OF NEW EVIDENCE THAT COULD NOT BE REASONABLY AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THE DETERMINATION MAY SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS.AFTER REVIEW OF THE COMMENTS,IF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE FINDS THERE IS NOT SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO AMEND ITS ORIGINAL DETERMINATION,THEN THERE WILL BE NO FURTHER EXTENSION OF THE APPEAL PERIOD. ANY PERSON WISHING TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION WOULD NEED TO FILE A FORMAL APPEAL WITHIN THE ORIGINAL 15-DAY TIMEFRAME. WRITTEN COMMENTS MUST BE FILED WITH: JANA HUERTER,LAND USE REVIEW SUPERVISOR,CITY OF RENTON DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION,200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH,RENTON,WA 98055. APPEALS OF EITHER THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [RCW 43.21.0075(3),WAC 197-11-680] AND/OR THE LAND USE DECISION MUST BE FILED IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE 5:00 PM OCTOBER 13,1997. IF NO APPEALS ARE FILED BY THIS DATE, BOTH ACTIONS WILL BECOME FINAL. APPEALS MUST BE FILED IN • WRITING TOGETHER WITH THE REQUIRED$75.00 APPLICATION FEE WITH:HEARING EXAMINER,CITY OF RENTON, 200 MILL AVENUE SOUTH,RENTON,WA 98055. APPEALS TO THE EXAMINER ARE GOVERNED BY CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 4-8-11 B. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE APPEAL PROCESS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE RENTON CITY CLERK'S OFFICE,(425)-235-2501. jIl{yI ;Em r} m 7 rum ..A �1 -:1- .. .-v, 4 a 7 e a I fo 1 t ... .,,:::,'IDeyti � • ice. 1p ��� ...7i:..... y AEI' --d'v'-.. ..III .m�.�.Yb�... 1---.; _____—:::,—,--------",-"":7.11-,.XF.irli-j..j7 :10-m, -:....irmiglik..°„;Am.-%.. ili.ri.!1•,e. , __. c,,L,,t,_\\- riot a�-d gc'; s4D �,' it _ .II' 11 � L - •pc_ 1 14 i :tril s[( w ;1 iham. te { � e._�A—l-'. tom__ ^"�y._:_. �-�F%AT J:iiii --8= FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY OF RENTON, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION AT 235-2550. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE WITHOUT PROPER AUTHORIZATION ...... ....... dentficatiori`"; ' ' '>;:> >_>;> ;;;:;:::;« ;;<;:Please:ancludeahe; ro ect:.NUMBER:when.;callin ,fnr; ,ro ,er;fle:t.... :. .:::::::::... \ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION Kristina Thompson, being first duly sworn on oath states that he/she is the Legal Clerk of the y�7 D*7,� T • NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 600 S. Washington Avenue, Kent, Washington 98032 RENTON,WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non- a daily newspaper published seven (7)times a week. Said newspaper is a legal Significance - Mitigated for the following newspaper of general publication and is now and has been for more than six months project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. prior to the date of publication, referred to, printed and published in the English language 501 CENTER PROJECT continually as a daily newspaper in Kent, King County, Washington. The South County LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF Journal has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the Environmentalal review and administrative 5, sq. t. site plan approval to build-a 15,000 sq. ft. • State of Washington for King County. , -= The notice in the exact form attached,was published in the South County I structure.Location:501 SW 10th St. Journal and not in supplemental form)which was regularly distributed to the subscribers The 15 day comment and appeal periodT ( PP g y I for this project will run concurrently. The during the below stated period. The annexed notice, a ! comment/appeal periods will end at 5:00 PM on October 13, 1997. Written com- ments shall be forwarded to the 501 Center Project , , Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the pro- a§ ublished on: 9/29/97 , ject file and the mitigation measures p imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are The full amount of the fee charged for said foregoing publication is the sum of$39.31 , available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Legal Number 3684 I Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235- 2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office,First Floor,Municipal • Building. aid I Published in the South County Journal gal Jerk, So!h County Journal September 29,1997.3684 Y_ __ Subscribed and sworn before me on this i d tay of r 4 19 r 7 / n c laitteye �'c,..`SS10i ;. 6 . Notary Public of the State of Washington ;`,`�;o.�' A�*�,.•y; residing in Renton Q•v oTA a�: 0= King County, Washington _®_ i0d` ^pUB LOGp%. Q=``` NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE RENTON, WASHINGTON The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) has issued a Determination of Non-Significance - Mitigated for the following project under the authority of the Renton Municipal Code. 501 CENTER PROJECT LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF Environmental review and administrative site plan approval to build a 15,000 sq.ft. structure. Location: 501 SW 10th St. The 15 day comment and appeal period for this project will run concurrently. The comment/appeal periods will end at 5:00 PM on October 13, 1997. Written comments shall be forwarded to the Development Services Division Land Use Review Supervisor. Information on the project file and the mitigation measures imposed by the City of Renton's Environmental Review Committee are available at the Development Services Division, Third Floor, Municipal Building, Renton, Washington 98055. Phone: 235-2550. Appeal procedures are available in the City Clerk's office, First Floor, Municipal Building. Publication Date: September 29, 1997 Account No. 51067 • dnsmpub.dot F CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT NAME: 501 Center Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The John C. Radovich Development Company is proposing to build a 15,000 square foot commercial structure on a 50,500 square foot site. The land is currently vacant except for a billboard. The planned use for the structure is auto retail (repair, service, and sale of related parts and accessories). The site will provide 57 parking stalls with access from SW 10th Street and SW Grady Way. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 SW 10th Street LEAD AGENCY: City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works Development Planning Section The City of Renton Environmental Review Committee has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). Conditions were imposed as mitigation measures by the Environmental Review Committee under their authority of Section 4-6-6 Renton Municipal Code. These conditions are necessary to mitigate environmental impacts identified during the environmental review process. Comments regarding the environmental determination must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13, 1997. Any aggrieved person feeling that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Committee is based on erroneous procedure, errors of law or fact, error in judgment, or the discovery of new evidence that could not be reasonably available at the time of the determination may submit written comments. After review of the comments, if the Environmental Review Committee finds there is not sufficient evidence to amend its original determination,then there will be no further extension of the appeal period. Any person wishing to take further action would need to file a formal appeal within the original 15-day timeframe. Written comments must be filed with: Jana Huerter, Land Use Review Supervisor, City of Renton Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South, Renton,WA 98055. Appeals of either the environmental determination [RCW 43.21.0075(3), WAC 197-11-680] and/or the land use decision must be filed in writing on or before 5:00 PM October 13,1997. If no appeals are filed by this date, both actions will become final. Appeals must be filed in writing together with the required $75.00 application fee with: Hearing Examiner, City of Renton, 200 Mill Avenue South, Renton, WA 98055. Appeals to the Examiner are governed by City of Renton Municipal Code Section 4-8-11 B. Additional information regarding the appeal process may be obtained from the Renton City Clerk's Office, (425)-235-2501. PUBLICATION DATE: September 29,1997 DATE OF DECISION: September 23, 1997 SIGNATURES: ' it q/2- 3/9 i 7 Gregg erm� a� n� dint rns ator DATE Depart e t of Pldnning/Building/Public Works . C Z7t4 ' Sa hastain, minlstrator DA Community Service Department n a- 4 : i'i c'04- 9�93 97 Le heeler, Fire Chief DAT%' e on Fire Department DNSMSIG.DOC F � _ CITY OF RENTON DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (MITIGATED) ADVISORY NOTES APPLICATION NO(S): LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT NAME: 501 Center Project DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The John C. Radovich Development Company is proposing to build a 15,000 square foot commercial structure on a 50,500 square foot site. The land is currently vacant except for a billboard. The planned use for the structure is auto retail (repair, service, and sale of related parts and accessories). The site will provide 57 parking stalls with access from SW 10th Street and SW Grady Way. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 501 SW 10th Street Advisory Notes to Applicant: The following notes are supplemental information provided in conjunction with the environmental determination. Because these notes are provided as information only, they are not subject to the appeal process for environmental determinations. General Comments 1. Garbage and recyclable deposit areas and collection points shall be easily and safely accessible to hauling trucks. 2. No underground or above ground storage tanks are shown on this site plan. If storage tanks are required in the future, separate permits and environmental review may be required. The applicant/landowner will need to check for the required permits with both the Development Services Division and the Fire Prevention Bureau. Surface Water Utility 3. The drainage system and temporary erosion control plans for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. Storm drainage (SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. on new impervious surface installed on the site by the project will be required. Waste Water Utility 4. The site is adjacent to Metro east side trunk line and connection would be permitted through a new City manhole on-site (with back-flow device) if the building F.F. level is below 25 foot elevation. Side sewer connection permit will cost$100. Sanitary sewer(SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required. Water Utility 5. All new water mains, fire hydrants, and DDCV assembly(building fire control system) needed to protect the proposed on-site building will be required to meet current Fire Codes/Regulations. Any new main, fire hydrants, or DDCV vault located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water(SDC)fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required. Transportation 6. New sidewalks will be required on SW 10th Street. Any proposed driveways to serve the site will be installed per City Codes/Standards and locations approved by the Transportation Engineering Section. A traffic study will be required to provide average daily trip generation in/out of the site. ' 501 Center Project LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF Page 2 Fire Prevention Bureau 7. The preliminary fire flow requirement is 2,500 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150 feet of the proposed structure and two fire hydrants are required within 300 feet of the structure. 8. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 9. Applicant shall complete a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous material. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of any aboveground or underground storage tanks. 10. Turning radius requirements for fire apparatus is 25 feet inside and 45 feet outside. Applicant shall modify sidewalks and curbs to meet this requirement. Construction Services 11. One hour exterior wall construction with parapet at east wall (less than 20 feet from property line)with protected openings is required. No openings less than five feet are allowed. 12. Limitation on projections is covered by Sec. 503, 1/3 distance to center line where openings require protection. 13.Auto repair shops require floor drains to oil/water separator. Airport Manager 14. The approval of this project and the issuance of building permits shall constitute the determination that the project is compatible with the operation of the airport and the flight of all types of aircraft over this site. 15. If construction height are in excess if a 100:1 slope from the runway centerline, a Notice of Proposed Construction is required, unless the structure is obviously shielded by existing structures. The information provided does not address shielding and height of the proposed structure above sea level. The applicant will need to work with the Airport Manager in making this determination. 16. The applicant shall not construct lighting which causes glare or other interference with the landing or operation of aircraft from the airport. (City of Renton Code 4-31-17) Community Services 17.All landscaped areas outside of the subject property is to be maintained by the adjacent landowner. 18. We do not recommend Western Cedars on the west property line to be located on the property line due to the spreading growth habit of these trees. Police Department 19. Based upon the size of the building, 7.76 calls for service are anticipated annually. Actual number will probably be higher. SW 10th Street is located in an area of the City that has a high commercial burglary, auto theft, and theft from vehicle report rate. 20. Recommend that building tools and materials be secured when not us use-especially during the construction phase of the project. The construction site should be fenced with portable fencing and be well lighted with security lighting. This will help reduce theft. 21. All exterior doors should be fitted with heavy-duty dead-bolt locks and a monitored security alarm is recommended. To help prevent thefts from parked vehicles, and auto theft, the lot should be fenced in and access prevented after hours by blocking both entrances/exit areas. 22. Glass windows and doors should have an application of security film added, or be of a shatter resistant material. CITY OF RENTON SEP 15 1997 6U11LUiNu (AVg6lONI CITY OF RENTON PLANNINGBUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS MEMORANDUM. DATE: September 15, 1997 TO: Paul Lambert FROM: ark Pywell SUBJECT: 501 Center Project LUA-97-127;SA-A,ECF Attached is a copy of the Level 1 Drainage Report. Please review and provide comments no later than Monday September 22, 1997. Thanks. ,'4rd e q= /5 - 7 j M iv 6/1-e t-L fh fAuL 1-"Ale&tr c1 501 CeNrest /4%35e ci ,.1,q c,_ ,/f6 v✓F64,e® �i 4�� 1 /,f 41,vi4 kc� 1e,'v/F- 4A2 r//® 7X116 i A/Cr 1c-c s9� svffr /Tle, City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL 8 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: tbktvC COMMENTS DUE: 9/12/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-127,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/28/97 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: 501 Center Project WORK ORDER NO: 78272 LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street SITE AREA 50,500 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 501 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair, service and sale of related parts and accessories). An administrative site plan and environmental review are required. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS I Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major information Impacts impacts Necessary impacts impacts Necessary Earth I Housing Air I Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet 1. ,(4, fO1ii MILS eS' vnaYot anti(,tally- L 0'i c. N. S' c._ �-h-c WC/' Cal ; 1 roPai � lLf ivZ. S - 'or bur�� . , actual nccm l S � 1 lo..Q / a can cz a. G cch,l - has a. high cat/ kitty �j '� t hen k6 r i- rc . t all lfdcll aukrna t � �nvt� In � ?. rn¢r�l (Vase. 7hc S-U should be., -Pencad a wi-khr 'lc Pen n , IL Well- Idi4-h se&4 I?N���h TGlll/1i CCrXSi-rU2 ice. Th.& to Lf At(o f0 redact t1,1u '% (2lGf erl(,Y Glar5 int flaw yaIICt-dC(.tc/ GxLtct � nA;torte Y;cv' gnu /s sfVi r • 7o help 'r' rt!-' Wifirts Qc k d vitrand GG'.(- 17 'r' / cat M k C. he. 'Pen ce d.. r / Gad , areas pre&'d. •it flvuns Octh10C - bo i e akz2nct.f art- ah cod • Ci_a.SS I,[1iAciot aOOi 3idaLcia. nave., alopilaco9n ob seetotry Alai WM, or he 0'6 cL 3 ha - A.css-tant- rytalvia We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable Impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. ,Q 9nature of Direct' or thorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC p Rev.10/P r Renton SOUTH RENTON : ,Z . CRIME PREVENTION Business WatchUNIT 25 235- 71 August, 1997 Dear South Renton Merchants, The next Business Watch class will be Wednesday, August 20th, from 6:30 to 8:00 pm, at Fire Station 11's training room (at the corner of Mill Ave S./S. 2nd St., across the street from City Hall). The training topic is Retail Employee Crime Prevention: employees are shown how to protect themselves and their workplaces from crime. Topics covered include: what to do before, during and after an armed robbery, how to reduce shoplifting, bad checks, and credit card fraud. This training is free. If you'd like to reserve a seat in the class, please give me a call at 235-2571. Due to the number of Commercial Burglaries that occurred in South Renton last month, here are a few prevention tips: • Leave interior and exterior lights on when the business is closed. Criminals prefer a dark business to conduct their crimes in - police prefer a lighted building so that we can see what's going on inside. • Remove expensive or attractive items from window displays. These items serve to attract a thief into breaking into the building. • Use heavy,duty dead-bolt locks on all interior and exterior doors, and install metal latch guards and pry-resistant door locking cylinders. Call the Crime Prevention Unit for further information on installation of security locks. • Keep your registers cleared of cash and use a drop safe. If there's no money left on the premises, it can't be stolen! • Post a sign stating there is no cash left on the premises. • Consider purchasing and installing Security Film. Call the Crime Prevention Unit for further information about this product. Most Commercial Burglaries occur during the hours of darkness, when businesses tend to be closed and the employees have all gone home. Burglars prefer to break into a business that is dark, where the likelihood of being observed by a witness is much less. For a free security survey of your business, give me a call at 235-2571. Sincerely, Ad/tery Nome Business Watch Coordinator Renton Police Department 235-2571 Citizens and Police: Partners for a Safe Community. SOUTH RENTON BUSINESS-RELATED CRIMES RECAP FOR THE MONTH OF JULY, 1997 CRIME/LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: $LOSS: AUTO THEFT: 200 SW 7th St. block '78 Datsun 280Z stolen/found 10 days later by Tukwila Police. $ 1000.00 400 SW 43rd St.block '93 Honda Accord stolen/found 2 weeks later by King County Police. $15000.00 400 SW 43rd St. block Red '90 Honda Accord stolen, license#395CVN. $15000.00 1200 Lind Ave SW block '67 Ford pickup stolen from Seattle,found in Renton parking lot. COMMERCIAL BURGLARY: . 300 SW 43rd St. block Rear door pried open/computer equipment stolen. $ 9170.00 900 Lind Ave SW block Padlock on fenced area cut/3 jetski's stolen. $18700.00 1000 Thomas Ave SW block Window smashed/office equipment stolen. $ 1100.00 1200 Monster Rd. SW block Entry gained via unlocked bay door/computer stolen. $ 150.00 1900 Raymond Ave"SW block Window smashed/office;items&electronics stolen. $ 9697.00 . i FRAUD/FORGERY/COUNTERFEIT: 900 Lind Ave SW block Suspect tried to buy a motorcycle with a stolen check and fake ID. He fled when the business began to verify the transaction prior to the sale. 3700 East Valley Rd. block Suspect used counterfeitl$100.00 bill to pay for services. Under investigation. 3900 Talbot Rd. S.block Suspect tried to pick up forged prescription. Case under investigation. i MALICIOUS MISCHIEF: ' 200 SW 41st St.block Tires slashed on 4 parked vehicles. $350.00 3700 East Valley Rd block Valve stems cut on all four tires of a parked vehicle. $ 10.00 THEFTS: 1 20 SW 7th St.block' Suspect received a hair .it and left without paying for it. $ 11.00 200 SW 43rd St.block Unsecured wallet stolen from employee's purse at a business counter. $ 70.00 ii 900 SW Grady Way block Unsecured cellular phone stolen from office desk top. $ 80.00 ii 900 SW Grady Way block Purse stolen from a student sleeping at a library desk. $ 20.00 3700 East Valley R .block Shoplift/1 adult arrested/soda and pastries stolen. $ 12.00 3700 East Valley Rd.block Shoplift/1 adult arrested/garage door opener stolen. $144.00 4000 Lind Ave SW block Rail lift stolen from a construction trailer. $600.00 4200 East Valley Rd.block Car Prowl/vehicle unlocked/misc. items and tools stolen. $771.00 1 DRUG/ALCOHOL ARRESTS: There were no DUI and two drug related arrests in the South Renton area,during the month of July, 1997. 2 • v,�.Y 0 y�> .. N'::� CTlIRIc2;/.i.•ir TRJOT-1A►T. a : TV l A . .. Adria-...- . . . . . tialliiiR 4. 2 x:; "w ✓ �rr ^�.v :aY.<rqn.mwwar ..w�.w �r:wc✓a.,,a.xr- >:q»..Ro..wc.r. v^raa++wOw• w.v�ox >w�.»w .c�o it" -M. _ 3. Vt Project Name 50 I Cevi fc v Project Address 5 ID 5�U (0x�' ) Contact Person 'Rebecca Dav,v(svvi 1 3C 2. Devt(oftwe.,Z` Co . Address 2000 - 1214 Avc 10c 13-/03) Be //cvke WA QW005 Phone Number (125 ) /)5 4 - 6060 • Permit Number L OA - q?-- 12-7 Project Description /5,600 Sq. 1- ¢.Owt wit vcict 5/✓u c1ivz.e -(vi aulo vela I - vePaiV , SeVV,ce 4 sales vb 've/Cltec loav7S, S r to ccvve.it/i1 ✓aca41. Land Use Type: Method of Calculation: ❑ Residential 0 ITE Trip Generation Manual Retail 0 Traffic Study ❑ Non-retail [ "Other— &v,vohiuental Check/is t Calculation: Checklist ( 14- -f) stcite, tk-te cud., k. 220 e,ta;/y t✓, S t✓r 5 At �7,� � p • ( 220) ( t75 ) = . 16, 600• 60 = Transportation Mitigation Fee: 14,, 500, 0o • Calculated by: iV e,P M0,114 Date: 14A7 Account Number: 26 q Date of Payment City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Feats. COMMENTS DUE: 9/12/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-127,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/28/97 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: 501 Center Project WORK ORDER NO: 78272 LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street SITE AREA: 50,500 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 501 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair, service and sale of related parts and accessories). An administrative site plan and environmental review are required. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shorellne Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historlc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation _ Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet Cif/!mac! B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS /// th-,Ge-E_);4;12370e/7123L__ 5 8 47- c___: i 00e/)7y b-//zL'c ig,t2i_eciee-er- 7 • C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is eded to properly asse this proposal. 7r S nature of Director or Authorized Representative Dat DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Surface/Wastewater Comments Due: 9/12/97 Application No.:LUA97-127-SA-A, ECF Date Circulated: 8/28/97 Applicant: John C. Radovich Project Manager: Mark Pywell Project Title: 501 Center Project Work Order No: 78272 Location: 501 SW 10th St. Site Area: 50,500 s.f Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments Surface Water: The drainage system and temporary erosion control plans for the site shall be designed in accordance with the 1990 KCSWDM as adopted by the City of Renton. The project will require a Type 1 Drainage Analysis to identify any up-stream or down stream drainage problems. Storm drainage (SDC) fees of$0.129/sq. ft. on new impervious surface installed on the site by the project will be required. Waste Water: The site is adjacent to Metro east side trunk line and connection would be permitted through a new City manhole on-site (with back-flow device) if the building F.F. level ist low 25 foot elevation. Side sewer connection permit will cost$100. Sanitary sewer (SDC) fees of$0.078/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date 5oictri City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: COMMENTS DUE: 9/12/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-127,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/28/97 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell C/7-1, r,- PROJECT TITLE: 501 Center Project WORK ORDER NO:. 78272 �U " rrON LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street G' 27 19 SITE AREA: 50,500 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): y' rye ' SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 5011 sN , reet. tld e The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair, service and sale of related parts and accessories). An administraaite plan and environmental review are required. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major information Environment Minor Major Information impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth! Housing Air I Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistodelCulhrrel Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS, We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas• where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of.Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Transportation Comments Due: 9/12/97 Application No.:LUA97-127-SA-A, ECF Date Circulated: 8/28/97 Applicant: John C. Radovich Project Manager: Mark Pywell Project Title: 501 Center Project Work Order No: 78272 Location: 501 SW 10th St. Site Area: 50,500 s.f. Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments New sidewalks will be required on SW 10th Street. Any proposed driveways to serve the site will be installed per City Codes/Standards and locations approved by the Transportation Engineering Section. A traffic study will be required to provide average daily trip generation in/out of the site. The project will require a traffic mitigation fee of$75/trip. Signature of Director r Authorized Representative Date � p 501ctr3 ,y(V'Y O U ,.„ . • .' Y • ♦ =� _41111r.° as Eszygo .'„�nqo.�'�;:»rw.a,�'b).':!R-"•.?liJ:ot9µ•H:10•• »� . .�,..•;.,K„•,�;N,.: .. ;:o< FEE Project Name 50 I Ce-vi tc v Project Address 5 l C) S l,U l 0 1" 5 Contact Person Rebecca Dav,dsoo Devtlo pi/wilt Co . Address 2000 - 12 y Yi A vz OE-, 8--ID 3 B e Ilcvi e WA RW 00.5 Phone Number ('f25 ) •- 454 - 6 060 Permit Number L.OA - q 7- 12 7 Project Description 15,00D Srt, /. e0144nttVcla 5I✓u vtiz,e ccciI4) yelc► I - ifcpa,V , sevv,ce 4 Sales yelet7ec,( loav7`S, s it'd cuvve)atl / ✓aca41. Land Use Type: Method of Calculation:. 0/Residential 0 ITE Trip Generation Manual lJ Retail 0 Traffic Study 0 Non-retail [Other— C h eckA I Calculation: G heck)is C ( i 4- -f) slakes t kr-Le uea l2c 220 ca;/y wits Af 1,7,E (1,24 to? • ( 22o) C 75 ) /6, 6OO. 6O Transportation Mitigation Fee: s/C, 600. °o Calculated by: iV ej Wail) Date: el4/9 7 Account Number: . Date of Payment BC 44. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL It DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVII/ SHEET. OF A�A� REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:,'ve..mp .y COMMENTS DUE: 9/12/97 AUG APPLICATION NO: LUA97-127,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/28/97 g 2 7 1997 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywe1T V gLL/llb� l64/0 PROJECT TITLE: 501 Center Project WORK ORDER NO: 78272 LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street SITE(AREA: 50,500 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 501 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair, service and sale of related parts and accessories). An administrative site plan and environmental review are required. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth' Housing Air ! Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas whereiadditional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Plan Review/Water Comments Due: 9/12/97 Application No.:LUA97-127-SA-A,ECF Date Circulated: 8/28/97 Applicant: John C. Radovich Project Manager: Mark Pywell Project Title: 501 Center Project Work Order No: 78272 Location: 501 SW 10th St. Site Area: 50,500 s.f. Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments No comment. B. Policy-Related Comments No comment. C. Code-Related Comments All new water mains, fire hydrants, and DDCV assembly (building fire control system) needed to protect the proposed on-site building will be required to meet current Fire Codes/Regulations. Any new main, fire hydrants, or DDCV vault located on private property will be required to be in easements that will be held by the City of Renton. Water (SDC) fees of$0.113/sq. ft. of gross area of the site is required. Signature of Director r Authorized Representative Date gP 501ctr2 City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL it DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: ptallf% Reu ter a W VCOMMENTS DUE: 9/12/97 • APPLICATION NO: LUA97-127,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/28/97 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: 501 Center Project WORK ORDER NO: 78272 LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street SITE I REA: 50,500 s.f. BUILDING AREA(gross): /7%. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commer tructure a rt,�g1 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair, service and sale of related parts and acce rrs). An atle)i, rative site plan and environmental review are required. �i)44 "7/ A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code)COMMENTS 04/ Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information impacts impacts Necessary impacts Impacts Necessary Earth I Housing Air I Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation _ _ __ Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ HistorIc/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS I ' C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have Identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 i RENTON FIRE DEPT -inr `rCMMT!fN BUREAU City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REAVOGE2,1I6 law ET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: Fiore_ eue v-h1 COMMENTS DUE: 9/12/97 1"v 4,.:0 I V F D APPLICATION NO: LUA97-127,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/28/97 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: 501 Center Project WORK ORDER NO: 78272 LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street SITE AREA: 50,500 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 501 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair, service and sale of related parts and accessories). An administrative site plan and environmental review are required. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth Housing Air , Aesthetics Water Light/Glare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet ALAAQ__ B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS fi � dt i ? 2 97 We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 CITY OF RENTON vY c.) o. FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU MEMORANDUM , NTo DATE: September 2, 1997 TO: Mark Pywell, Senior Planner FROM: Corey Thomas, Plans Review Inspector SUBJECT: Code-Related Comments for 501 Center Project 11. The preliminary fire flow required is 2,500 gpm. Three fire hydrants are required. One fire hydrant is required within 150-feet of the proposed structure and two fire hydrants are required within 300-feet of the structure. 2. The fire mitigation fees are applicable at the rate of$0.52 per square foot of building: 15,000 square feet x $0.52 = $7,800.00 This fee is payable at the time of building permit issuance. 3. An approved fire sprinkler system is required to be installed throughout the structure. 4. Applicant shall complete a hazardous material inventory statement and comply with all requirements for the storage and use of hazardous material. Separate plans and permits are required for the installation of any aboveground or underground storage tanks. 5. Turning radius requirements for fire apparatus is 25-feet inside and 45-feet outside. Applicant shall modify sidewalks and curbs to meet this requirement. CT:ss Precom City w-. anton Department of Planning/Building/P, ...,.:Works ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT:ebin w n COMMENTS DUE: 9/12/97 el VFRENTON APPLICATION NO: LUA97-127,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/28/97 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywey, 0 2 7 1397 PROJECT TITLE: 501 Center Project WORK ORDER NO: 78272 !�u LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street L„„a-6,1,4%A IJtVtSION SITE AREA: 50,500 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 501 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair, service and sale of related parts and accessories). An administrative site plan and environmental review are required. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth; Housing Air Aesthetics Wafer LIghVGlare Plants Recreation Land/Shoreline Use Utilities Animals Transportation Environmental Health Public Services Energy/ Historic/Cultural Natural Resources Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet B. POLICY-RELATED COMMENTS C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional information Is needed to properly assess this proposal. Signature of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVAPP.DOC Rev.10/93 L. City of Renton Department of Planning/Building/Public Works ENVIRONMENTAL &DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET Reviewing Department Construction Services Comments Due:9/12/97 Application No.: LUA97-127,SA-A,ECF Date Circulated: 8/28/97 Applicant: John C. Radovich Project Manager: Mark Pywell Project Title: 501 Center Project Work Order No: 78272 Location: 501 SW 10th St. Site Area: 50,500 s.f. Building Area(gross): A. Environmental Impact(e.g.Non-Code) Comments B. Policy-Related Comments * One hour exterior wall construction with parapet at east wall (less than 20' from property line); protected openings, :-, P openings less than 5' . * Limitation on projections - Sec. 503, 1/3 distance to center line from line where openings require protection. *Auto repair shops require floor drains to oil/water separator. C. Code-Related Comments ignature of Dir or or Authorized Representative Date h:mp:501ctr City o:, nton Department of Planning/Building/PuL.._ .Vorks ENVIRONMENTAL & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION REVIEW SHEET REVIEWING DEPARTMENT: "kw peer COMMENTS DUE: 9/12/97 APPLICATION NO: LUA97-127,SA-A, ECF DATE CIRCULATED: 8/28/97 APPLICANT: John C. Radovich PROJECT MANAGER: Mark Pywell PROJECT TITLE: 501 Center Project WORK ORDER NO: 78272 LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street SITE AREA: 50,500 s.f. I BUILDING AREA(gross): SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 501 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair, service and sale of related parts and accessories). An administrative site plan and environmental review are required. A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT(e.g.Non-Code) COMMENTS Element of the Probable Probable More Element of the Probable Probable More Environment Minor Major Information Environment Minor Major Information Impacts Impacts Necessary Impacts Impacts Necessary Earth V Housing ✓ Air ✓ Aesthetics Water V Light/Glare ✓ Plants r Recreation r Land/Shoreline Use ✓ Utilities IV Animals v Transportation d Environmental Health r Public Services Energy/ Histonc/Cultural i Natural Resources ✓ Preservation Airport Environment 10,000 Feet 14,000 Feet t� NON,e. B. IPOLICY-RELATED COMMENTS The approval of the project and the issuance of a building permit shall constitute the determination that the project is compatible with the operation of the airport and the flight of all types of aircraft over or near the site. If construction exceeds height in' excess Of a 100:1 slope from the runway centerline, a Notice of Proposed Construction is required, unless the structure is obviously shielded by existing structures. The information does not address shielding and height of the proposed structure above sea level , only height above ground level . C. CODE-RELATED COMMENTS The project shall not construct lighting which causes glare or other interference with the landing or operation of aircraft from the airport. City of Renton code 4-31-17. We have reviewed this application with particular attention to those areas in which we have expertise and have identified areas of probable impact or areas where additional info ation is needed to properly assess this proposal. 1/4Ewlux. 3 tq^l Signa ea of Director or Authorized Representative Date DEVA• '•C Rev.10/93 *U.S.GPO:1993-U-34/-12/ • . i n • .i �. J L A ' NOTICE OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OR ALTERATION §77.13 Construction or alteration requiring notice. §77.15 Construction or alteration not requiring notice:• (a) Except as provided in§77.15,each sponsor who proposes any of the following No person is required to notify the Administrator for any of the following construc- construction or alteration shall notify the Administrator in the form and manner lion or alteration: - prescribed in§77.17: (a) Any object that would be shielded by existing structures of a permanent and (1)Any construction or alteration of more than 200 feet in height above the ground substantial character or by natural terrain or topographic features of equal or greater level at its site. height and would be located in the congested area of a city,town, or settlement (2)Any construction or alteration of greater height than an imaginary surface extending where it is evident beyond all reasonable doubt that the structure so shielded will outward and upward atone of the following slopes: not adversely affect safety in air navigation. (i) 100 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 20,000 feet from the nearest point of (b)Any antenna structure of 20 feet or less in height except one that would increase the nearest runway of each airport specified in subparagraph(5)of this paragraph the height of another antenna structure. with at least one runway more than 3,200 feet in actual length,excluding heliports. (c) Any air navigation facility, airport visual approach or landing aid, aircraft arrest- (ii) 50 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 10,000 feet from the nearest point of ing device, or meteorological device, of a type approved by the Administrator, or the'nearest runway of each airport specified in subparagraph(5)of this paragraph an appropriate military service on military airports,the location and height of which with its longest runway no more than 3,200 feet in actual length,excluding heliports. is fixed by its functional purpose. (iii) 25 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 5,000 feet from the nearest point of (d)Any construction or alteration for which notice is required by any other FAA regulation. the Inearest landing and takeoff area of each,heliport specified in subparagraph (5)of this paragraph. (3) Any highway, railroad, or other traverse way for mobile objects, of a height §77'17 Form and time of notice. which,if adjusted upward 17 feet for an Interstate Highway that is part of the National (a) Each person who is required to notify the Administrator under §77.13 (a) shall System of Military and Interstate Highways where overcrossings are designed for send one executed form set of FAA Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration,to the Manager,Air Traffic Division,FAA Regional Office having jurisdiction a minimum of 17 feet vertical distance, 15 feet for any other public roadway, 10 over the area within which the construction or alteration will be located. Copies of feet or,the height of the highest mobile object that would normally traverse the FAA Form 7460-1 may be obtained from the headquarters of the Federal Aviation road, which aver is greater, for a private road, 23 feet for a railroad, and for a Administration and the regional offices. waterway or any other traverse way not previously mentioned, an amount equal to thelheight of the highest mobile object that would normally traverse it, would (b)The notice required under§77.13(a)(1)through (4) must be submitted at least ' exceed a standard of subparagraph(1)or(2)of this paragraph. 30 days before the earlier of the following dates— ' (1)The date the proposed construction or alteration is to begin. (4) When requested by the FAA, any construction or alteration that would be in (2)The date an application for a construction permit is to be filed. an instrument approach area(defined in the.FAA standards governing instrument However, a notice relating to proposed construction or alteration that is subject to approach procedures)and available information indicates it might exceed a standard . the licensing requirements of the Federal Communications Act may be sent to the of Subpart C of this part FAA at the same time the application for construction is filed with the Federal (5)Any construction or alteration on any of the following airports(including heliports): Communications Commission,or at any time before that filing. (i)An airport that is available for public use and is listed in the Airport Directory (c)A proposed structure or an alteration to an existing structure that exceeds 2,000 of the current Airman's Information Manual or in either the Alaska or Pacific feet in height above the ground will be presumed to be a hazard to air navigation Airman's Guide and Chart Supplement and to result in an inefficient utilization of airspace and the applicant has the burden (ii)An airport under construction,that is the subject of a notice or proposal on of overcoming that presumption.Each notice submitted under the pertinent provisions file with the Federal Aviation Administration, and except for military airports, it of Part 77 proposing a structure in excess of 2,000 feet above ground,or an alteration is clearly indicated that that airport will be available for public use. that will make an existing structure exceed that height must contain a detailed showing (iii)An airport that is operated by an armed force of the United States. directed to meeting this burden.Only in exceptional cases,where the FAA concludes (b) Each sponsor who proposes construction or alteration that is the subject of a that a clear and compelling showing has been made that it would not result in an notice under paragraph (a)of this section and is advised by an FAA regional office inefficient utilization of the airspace and would not result in a hazard to air navigation, that a supplemental notice is required shall submit that notice on a prescribed form will a determination of.no hazard be issued. to be received by the FAA regional office at least 48 hours before the start of the (d) In the case of an emergency involving essential public services, public health, construction or alteration. or public safety,that requires immediate construction or alteration,the 30 day require- (c) Each sponsor who undertakes construction or alteration that is the subject of ment in paragraph (b) of this section does not apply and the notice may be sent a notice under paragraph(a)of this section shall,within 5 days after that construction by telephone,telegraph, or other expeditious means, with an executed FAA Form or alteration reaches its greatest height,submit a supplemental notice on a prescribed 7460-1 submitted within five (5) days thereafter. Outside normal business hours, form to the FAA regional office having jurisdiction over the area involved,if— emergency notices by telephone or telegraph may be submitted to the nearest FAA (1) The construction or alteration is more than 200 feet above the surface level Flight Service Station. of its site;or (e) Each person who is required to notify the Administrator by paragraph (b)or(c) (2) An FAA regional office advises him that submission of the form is required. of §77.13, or both, shall send an executed copy of FAA Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration,to the Manager,Air Traffic Division,FAA Regional Office having jurisdiction over the area involved. ADDRESSES OF THE REGIONAL OFFICES Western Pacific Region Southern Region Great Lakes Region New England Region HI,CA,NV,AZ,GU KY,TN,NC,SC,GA,AL, ND,WI,MI,SD,IL,OH,MN,IN MA,NH,VT,RI,CT,ME Western-Pacific Regional Office MS,FL,VI,PR Great Lakes Regional Office New England Regional Office Air Traffic Division,AWP-530 Southern Regional Office Air Traffic Division,AGL-530 Air Traffic Division,ANE-530 15000 Aviation Boulevard Air Traffic Division,ASO-530 2300 East Devon Avenue 12 New England Executive Park Hawthorne,CA 90260 3400 Norman Berry Drive Des Plaines,IL 60018 Burlington,MA 01803 Tel.310-297-1365 East Point,GA 30344 Tel.312-694-7568 Tel.617-273-7143 Mail Address: Tel.404-763-7646 Southwest Region Eastern Region AWP-530 Mail Address: NM,TX,OK,AR,LA NY,PA,WV,VA,DC,MD,DE,NJ P.O.Box 92007 Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Regional Office Eastern Regional Office WorldWay Postal Center Southern Regional Office Air Traffic Division,ASW-530 Air Traffic Division,AEA-530 Los Angeles,CA 90009 Air Traffic Division,ASO-530 P.O.Box 20636 4400 Blue Mound Road JFK International Airport Alaskan Region Fort Worth,TX 76193 Fitzgerald Federal Building Atlanta,GA 30320 AK Tel.817-624-5534 Jamaica,NY 11430 Alaskan Regional Office Northwest Mountain Region Mail Address: Tel.718-553-1228 Air Traffic Division,AAL-530 WA,OR,MT,ID,WY,UT,CO Department of Transporation Fax:718-553-1384 222 West 7th Avenue Northwest Mountain Regional Office Federal Aviation Administration Anchorage,AK 99513 Air Traffic Division,ANM-530 Fort Worth,TX 76193-0530 Tel.907-271-5893 1601 Lind Avenue,SW Central Region Mailing Address: Renton,WA 98055-4056 NE,IA,MO,KS Federal Aviation Administration Tel.206-227-2530 Central Regional Office Alaskan Regional Office Fax:206-227-1530 .., Air Traffic Division.ACE-530 -:_-:4--1A,.-::/9:-.---4T -0-lN,•0..Q•.,.Y m..-o.i.i. r 1ifi l i0-u-V1 jL ___=_= = 1,1i k, 1rET1i,I..Lz i7 A;,,Ij(Ln1!7A7A11 I2i i\i• f- c 1_3-\1i ` _ 7 Gull,/a r [1w� 1 _ f'r e',,k1\11i . 4 .�- _..--te- r- r--- ' - _--_C -_ , t� 't/ tl� f _= - - - _-- -_ _ _ ___ _, _-�,_ Q . _ 1 . -----:-:::---:-:::":"::::-:::::::::::::-::.-_1:::.::::::::::::::::::::::::::i7K-K.:::.:::::::.:EIK:K:::::::::K.::::::::::::::::EN%I------ ---1—ff.53 1156 ,.....ca _I,.—" 10„.N.ti-----,__, --EEEEEE:33::._:]:-:::-:-,E:E:E:E::::.:E:::.::::::::KEE:Hae::::„:„:„Kt.::::_,,,.,_ 44, 11 I b.-\------- ____,_i...N-ici' m--c. _,...,„ ilr __ ___ __--____ _ - - _:-_ r_ -_::::_A_ I a I���� I � P I M B Im'a;Lc,:=3---bi-, ----:::::::KKEE:::::435:E:_:::_;_::_:..K:E:KE:H.-7-::::::::::EE:3-.K.f ::3::::::::::::1-3:Ef_ • __ I MIA .1 III ..",:,r TA n. -I" ,ratrr. ,41,,, .irri__ ..- , ]il ' V-ii, 4. 71:tEtE:-.1:,A3-.K.:EEE:ii:_EEE:ET:321333.3:1::::_:E:Et.:::__:_.:...]::::::::_:::::* g I eil.wilia_ iv,_I .1111 EMI:„4-71, RR a if 1 DI r iF 4 1.! ,".,A k 41 I IPII I I IN 04 441 4 c7...'"7.••:•:-::-."2"...-H-7.-:•:::•"H":-:••:•••:•":•"..-..r-'-'...'" .........:-:-:-.7-H...7..:% , ) -3, , (0,, ,c•.--.1 ;0R:: b( •4 .“.,"•"7.:::::::::::..:".•:.:::::::::E:E:.K.:E:::.::::::.:_::_::::::_.:::::E::::::::::: i 1 , 1 9.,-i r. 2 . MS Oa riej r,,," i ITAktilppillo'ithi..---=::::_:_:::::-:::::::::::::::•::-.:-_--_-E_E_E*-.E_EE_EjE:::_EjEf_-_:II:E._::::::::-_-:-..E.,:E::::_q:----- d I I, . --ii g '' .1''IA I -. .1.. "ilL ° t , mem gr."1 . r7'• ---__--KEEEE:HEE::::::::::::EV. , a iji,„ ____!,-.CIIM31114 -:-- .•.--".:21:-'. =7,..ow.) EDa_si-iwl\ imi. I ..ii I i ,. 1 L..... I F .11 o ..11t4,,,. .n FIP Id flaT '-j'I'l‘ 7 1114 fiCrir% ! •AU Lill& 0 ��QI M . I , * 111 triti Ir I I IN 7; ( c9 rekt 7.6.14,1 V,, 1 4 Z e.I ,,:ill 1 bi C=1, ___I ..,.., • i ,„I i. ' P 1 N'W4j111::pl L�lLl P �t/[L7 QII7 iniL j Jn a .. it � 1111I� .e , A ' :::„irdi- O� ci MI I�.1!1.I.R7. t k'll Aiill 6 F Law a liel i _ �=iitN �� yo per. �r 4tig- itir Q —c. _ i u,w "I tine t tuua (3 yk.,fr • PEIrki,...1•1 *ill. tqgiri ;' r- -: '1' iiti• a ,1� --:�►�,�r' r.1 it 1.7N +i�I ,,pro, ._. . $ be Ar ALNi.. ritilt ':.--7.'''''' .' .1' .°.44*b ..1 "1/1'it 47'1-- -41W711 ""- -' jai IMFA t'>" 'i Allipi* ‘katinti tr 'Allan'MD F7 0 IG 4'c mut Oa - 4-A, tig. illi.o. Kiri . ) Ire di W DI . .. r..la All;.:01illia'' • A . ' ._ -. . . -.7..,..1.,, ,„ 11111 a m IllukkWlll ! tdl d a !i .� IIP ® per-' �� - - A ''\ i �! /0' 1; 1 _,tr" ' 1 -' A livritiiii t....k ? ,_,-- - .,,,,, i ,, , NI, , )111111. lir co co co " .. .-. ._.--....,,.} • . .,Wrt".......'.. . gr,,,, ) -- 1 1 , mil ___.:, 1..".. , ,.- _ ,Iii.w..- (z_l_1_7-,,i, .4z)1....,. N-.1 Fir-...,4 ' to fL •-tr>•li •-• E rkiii[N)I P ,• �-�i ,,!,.illt(iv_ I I\Ltd 1.9.1 -k _____.—. tad MI ' L . f" __ _, ,. ,., - i 4 AIX'.' 011/ ,„ . - ' Vti M . i rv_ifi A4).. 44 1 ... r.ennow 3. - - In , • : 4..., A ‘71,,,* 1 , s,. ',_ C i.- Idi , .. [- R r F .N I . 1:,=11,:, , , . I(II 6 s, a t CIT`_ OF RENTON :.1 :1 Planning/Building/Public Works Department Jesse Tanner,Mayor Gregg Zimmerman P.E.,Administrator August 28, 1997 Rebecca Davidson John C. Radovich Development Company 2000- 124th Avenue NE, B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: 501 Center Project LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF Dear Ms. Davidson: The Development Planning Section of the City of Renton has determined that the subject application is complete according to submittal requirements and, therefore,.is accepted for review. It is tentatively scheduled for consideration by the Environmental Review Committee on September 23, 1997. Prior to that review, you will be notified if any additional information is required to continue processing your application. Please contact me, at 277-5586, if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mark Pyw I . Project Hager cc: John C. Radovich . ACPTLIR.DOC 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 • RI This paper contains 50%recycled material.20%Host consumer • itiR NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING/BUILDING/PUBLIC WORKS DATE: August 29, 1997 An Administrative Site Plan Approval and Environmental Review Application has been filed and accepted with the Development Services Division of the City of Renton. The following briefly describes the application and the necessary Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: 501 Center Project LUA-97-127,SA-A,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 501 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail (repair, service and sale of related parts and accessories). An administrative site plan and environmental review is required. GENERAL LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street STUDIES REQUIRED/OR AVAILABLE: PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval Building Permit Comments on the above application must be submitted in writing to Mark Pywell, Project Manager, Development Services Division,200 Mill Avenue South,Renton,WA 98055,by 5:00 PM on October 13, 1997. If you have questions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mail,contact Mark Pywell, the Project Manager, at 277-5586. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION DATE OF APPLICATION: August 27,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 28,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: August 29,1997 ._— � __ -�TJutI1 magi-A •. _ '_ `� . is , p Rii'` }t� t r I c .I. ,.•.i. Fey,... �J'i. c ..........�.,e:._r � !'-✓" 'Z'::.:Y: ` ,ILLNlryll = p :_ 0 •qT"�'b a Via$ I - {— Ili rlr III . f . I co co: 5 cac rI'ks\ g;I I GENMALOT.DOC .�„I� ©I cj:7`» `' _ iI �� :�_�.. 2}.is�iPt�ro�Ttiri•� m!59.._:_. E_.-�F —_b-- a 'ill ;7:4 RE IVFDD 1 J AUG 2 6 1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON 501 CENTER 510 S.W. 106 Street Renton, Washington PROJECT NARRATIVE • John C. Radovich Development Company is proposing to build a 15,000 square foot commercial structure on land of 50,500 square feet located at 501 S.W. 10th Street in the City of Renton. The land is currently vacant,with electrical power poles and a billboard as the only improvements. The location of the proposed structure, and its height of twenty-five feet, will not obstruct the view of any existing structures or residential units. The planned use of the proposed commercial structure is auto retail (repair, service and the sale of related parts and accessories). The proposed site plan for the"auto center"will have fifty-seven parking stalls and access off both S.W. 10th Street and Grady Way. JOI1fIC.1IdOV1C11 Development Company 2000-124th Ave.N.E. B-103 Bellevue,WA 98005 (425) 454-6060 ITY. F: TON;::;>< °:DEVELOPMENT: LISOFSURROUNDING ;PROPERTY r ::OWNER • • PROJECT NAME: 501 Center - APPLICATION NO: LUA "q1- 12 •SA-A, The following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of the subject site. The Development Services Division will notify these individuals of the proposed development. NAME' ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Douglas Buck 627 SW 12th Street, Renton, WA 98055 3340'40 4805 Ronald & Jacqueline Forte _ P.O. Box 816, Renton, WA 98057 • 192305 9062 Jim & Marguerite Gotti 5707 E. US Highway 80, #1197, Yuma-, AZ 334040 4590 85365. Leo Hertz 608. SW 12th Street, Renton, WA 98055 334040 4845 Leo Hertz 608 SW '12th Street, Renton, WA 98055 334040 4855 Jeffery & Linda Johnson 1406 E. Woodcliff Road, Spokane,' WA 99203 334040 4785 JOHNSON—LIEBER, INC. 723 SW 10th Street, Renton, WA 98055 ' 192305 9087 " John & Carol Radovich 2000 124th Ave. NE, B-103, Bellevue, WA 192305 9078 98005 John & Carol Radovich 2000 124th Ave. NE, B-103, Bellevue, WA 192305 9084 98005 • RENTON WEST; INC. 607 SW Grady Way, #200, Renton, WA 334040 4705 98055 Joseph & Son Ryerson • 30 W. 'Monroe Street, Chicago, IL 60603 214600 0050 ' THE PENTA GROUP ' 1815 Rolling Hills Ave. SE, Renton, WA 334040 4730 • • 98055 . TIMELESS HOLDINGS PARTNERSHIP P.O. Box 273, Issaquah, WA 98027 334040 4470 • • • • • • • • . • RECEIVE', • 26- 1997 • • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING (Attach additional sheets, if necessary) CITY OFRENTON • t (Continued) NAME ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Applicant Certification I, John C. Radovich , hereby certify that the above list(s) of adjacent property (Print Name) owners and their addresses were obtained from: •••`�'���t"'••o •• 80L •L ❑ City of Renton Technical Services Records C.),40'�oN"'•''•,,�••, :. Title Company Records • �� • !�.a g5 A ., • ❑ King County Assessors Records s :�(13 Aj� P `� g17 PUBS Signed Date �t � SP 4'J . (Applicant) s NOTARY ••••••••t••a��� o ATTESTED: Subscribed and sworn before me, a Notary Public, in/ard for the State of Washington, residing at i J/1.2-2 on the�h day of �-L ' ,L , 19 . Signed aildt-1--tedb*(/, (Notary Public) •>.::.::: ..:.::.:..... ::::.. . r:. _i f.R n n.Use::.;:.;:.;::.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.;:.::.:::.;::..::.::: :.;::;::;:;::;>:;�::>::>::><:><:::>::::::>::::<:>:::>:::>:::;::;:::::.:: .::.:::.:.:..::...:.:.::...:..:. .:.. :... ..............:.. .. TIFI ATION OF::MAILING :<::>::<::<.»:>:::>: ;: :::..::;.;:.><: =':: '1:,.;::>::><::;:<:>::<:. :: :.<•-,i.�>��tr><�d:1(�°�. .� .. .::..::::...:::..:.::::.......:.........:. each;listed ro .ert.::::owne�:.on;:::>::> .:. �:;> :: ::;::.: ::.::.:.:::»:;:.::::<:>::::>::>:>:<:>:>;:::>;»:»:;::>::::>:::<:>::»;;>;:::..:::•:;:�.,........ ...........�.. ..... . .::.::.... ......:... • ....::.... ..:.... ... . . .......... ...:::::.. ATTEST; S ibscribed:and.svv6rn before:me;.a Notary Fubl c• ;:in!;'and`for.the State of<Wash ngton residing::at (o i{�S" 5�•• •/ ' ig• -`'��� 9 • at n lislprop.doc REV 07/95 MARILYN KAMCHEFF 2 LION EXPIRES 6/29/99 _ US,SY O41 �. N'TO.' & NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING!BUILDINGIPUBLIC WORKS • DATE: August 29,1997 An Administrative Site Plan Development Services Division pofr th e City of Renton.and Environmental The following briefly describes the application and the necessary ' Public Approvals. PROJECT NUMBER/NAME: 501 Center Project LUA 97-127,SA-A,ECF DESCRIPTION: The applicant seeks to construct a 15,000 square foot commercial structure at 501 SW 10th Street. The proposed use of the building is auto retail(repair,service and sale of related pads and accessories).An administrative site plan and environmental review Is required. GENERAL LOCATION: 501 SW 10th Street STUDIES REOUIREDIOR AVAILABLE: PUBLIC APPROVALS: Environmental Review Site Plan Approval . Building Permit • Comments on the above on must be ll,Project ment elo Services Division,200 Mill Avenue iSouth,, submitted writing R nton,WA 98055,by5 00 PM on October 13,1997,I Manager,f youhaDvevquesttions about this proposal,or wish to be made a party of record and receive additional notification by mall,contact Mark Pywell, • the Project Manager,at 277-5588. Anyone who submits written comments will automatically become a party of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. `PLEASE INCLUDE THE PROJECT NUMBER WHEN CALLING FOR PROPER FILE IDENTIFICATION , DATE OF APPLICATION: August 27,1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 28,1997 DATE OF NOTICE OF APPLICATION: August 29,1097 • • 1..r €. ft, ii ,,,,- , . ,,,,,- - - ,,_:Nry 1 k ice= �- -:�1q f:�.t • GENWLLDT.DOd —r-� ..,'-""' .r__ CERTIFICATION • Ir ilirrr M,,(i, ,-r-, . hereby certify that 3 copies of the above document were posted by me in 3 conspicuous places on or nearby the described property on • Signed: • .� "'t01, STATE OF WASHINGTON ) • ) SS COUNTY OF KING ) , I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that �/47T /li I/ '1.1 T 1 signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her/their free and v.olu,�XA!ry^ya'Lt.f11gr the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. , ,,,, 4y:••,..-1 Doled: �'i q� No/22s y Pu.Iin and• the State rof:WWsriiggl'on ^.o ,4•, Notary (Print) MARG'ARET J. PULLAR My appointment expires: C®MMISStON EXPIRES 6/9/98 NOTARY,OOC • "'•'X' • ....,;;• > iiir D • ::>:;:;;:::::>::::::::>::>:«:::::::>::.:...�.... . . C.. ...:.:.. . . 4... ...... ... .. .. ';<';1';as."''i3ttacli"art'addit nal`Note:;:'If:thee;is'inore a pp PROJECT OR DEVELOPMENT NAME: NAME: John C. Radovich 501 Center pgeJ I PROPERTY/PROJECT ADDRESS(S)/LOCATION: ADDRESS: 501 SW 10th Street 2000 124th Avenue NE, B-103 Renton, Washington CITY: ZIP: KING COUNTY ASSESSOR'S ACCOUNT NUMBER(S): Bellevue 98005 1923.05-9084 TELEPHONE NUMBER: • EXISTING LAND USE(S): (425)_ 454-6060 Vacant land a.:::::ow.::: PROPOSED LAND USES: NAME: • Auto retail center COMPANY(if applicable): EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION: EAV ADDRESS: • PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION (if applicable): Not applicable CITY: ZIP: EXISTING ZONING: Arterial Commercial TELEPHONE NUMBER: • PROPOSED ZONING (if applicable): ' : N>TAT>:`.PER.:::' .N:;>:: : •:>:::»:; • • •• : :•; :•••;;;;:>•:;;,>::SO ;:; ;::::>::. ::.:::: .•»> Not applicable SITE AREA (SQ. FT. OR ACREAGE): NAME: • • Rebecca Davidson 50,500 SF • PROJECT VALUE: ti,�CON�P.•PyI Y'(i'foapplicable): Radovich Development Company $1.3 million - 4 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN THE AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA? M ,,- ' c ,i.i-g2 0 124th Avenue NE, B-103 y: ' ` No •GI'f•Yi tr,='`J ' ZIP: . ^' B*,,] evue 98005 IS THE SITE LOCATED IN ANY OTHER TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY '4r+ia.�ad,;4,4ae' SENSITIVE AREA? (TELEPHONE NUMBER: No (425) 454-6060 • I - e» es :::,>::.:::.;:>::::::.::::: ::::>.:':L:EGaCDESCt� _011(.::0..::::..�;RO.PERTY::.{Attach..se 2 �:<sheet:>If.;. . .. . .. ....... .y.:;:::.:::::..:. Lot 3 of City of Renton Short Plat No. 138-81, according to Short Plat recorded under King County recording No. 8105149003 >:::>::TYPE: E A PLI TI E S r ne :> �::> :k'alf '''���l n "es a s C to e mr a fe s �<:<::>:<«<:>:» >::;:: ::>::>:::::�::Chec cat t s e. ........................... ... apP o ...tYp. . . — ANNEXATION $ SUBDIVISION: - . o b s i to s erat.ely _ COMP. PLAN AMENDMENT $ /27/9 — REZONE $ _ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT $ _ SPECIAL PERMIT $ — SHORT PLAT $ _TEMPORARY PERMIT $ _TENTATIVE PLAT -$ - _ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $ _ PRELIMINARY PLAT $ _ SITE PLAN APPROVAL $ 1.000 _ FINAL PLAT $ — GRADE & FILL PERMIT $ (NO. CU. YDS: ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: $ -VARIANCE $_ (FROM SECTION: ) _ PRELIMINARY _WAIVER I $ _ FINAL _WETLAND PERMIT $ ROUTINE VEGETATION — $ MANAGEMENT PERMIT $ MOBILE HOME PARKS: _ BINDING SITE PLAN $ • SHORELINE REVIEWS: _ SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT $ _ CONDITIONAL USE $ _ VARIANCE $ I _ EXEMPTION $No Charoe _ ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $ 500 _ REVISION I $ Checklist . I - I, (Print Name) J hh C. WGUIGh ,declare that I am (please check one) the owner of the property involved in this application,_lithe authorized representative to act for the property owner(please attach proof of Suthorization), and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ,C� � N� ATTEST: Subscribe nd sworn to before me, a Notary Public,iin and a..' �� //(` Q-CL O [/�G for a to of residing (Na of 0 ner/Representative) ;" � t9 , on the iay of ''esspul1!14I, ,( / , I , .•;4 BOc b, Si nature of Owner/Representative) ,P ••`^�„,,,.ow�»u. Q �e, (Sig ture• Notary Public ; V.F �ftp N �$ ib CO it.4 olARr .. .::..::::::: ::::::.:.:.::.::: .............................................................................................. :>::.: >; ::>:::::::::><::>:::<::><:::;<:<>:::<:»::<::::::>::>»»»:::<::<::<: :::. ..I...;,...... ......,.;: o::be co eted b ..0 St .f.)......... ....:.:..:: . :.:.... ..:..::.:. . ::: :.:::: ....(..Th s.a.ect�on:t : ...........mp:..: .:...;:..:Y.::::nY.: ::::::. :::::::::.:.:.::::.:.:::::::::::�:. .::. ..:,: I .;.::41'; .;. . .::�t::::::�:.: .:;:;:: ;>;>;:. :::::: >::;;::.: ::>::»: - :»: PA<::::.CU-A>:::<::::C. .. ., t. ,. �„ Clt le:.Number.:.<.<:� <:::::.<,:�:<:.:.a�<:. .: .... ..;»:«AAD BSPCAI'.:5:::::CAp::U:>;:.;:..0....::.::::::<.:: ...:.:::::::::::: :::: .:: .a_-.,- . ::<: M >: M E< TP::>:. . >.;:::': .�. ::>:::;MI1F:.>:FPUD..>::>FF:;.P..:.F::R:::>:::::R�/MP::<::SQ:. >;::;SA=H:>:>:SHPL-A:::::SNPL.H::::<:::SP::>::.S. . ..S .... ...... ,,... ir .... ..: ..::::::.. :::..TOTTAL:PO.STAGE';PRO:V.IDED:::5:. : ' : :> : .... + gnu ; ::..::TOTAL::FEES:: $:>�:��'�.:..:.:: :::.;;:.;;:.>;: : .: ::: ::.;:.;:.;:;:..:.:�..::. • MASTERAP.DOC REVISED 9/96 1 • RECEIVED • AUG 2 6 1997 • G :>::tiEVELOPME. T SERVICES DIV S ONEEN: > > '>' >:::>::»::>:iiii:::::: :>:iii i>::::><:iiii::>im PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: • The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. •The purpose of this.checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of. your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know"or"does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. • USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions (actions involving decisions on policies, plans and.programs), the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Environmental Checklist A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: I 501 Center 2. Name of applicant: John C. Radovich Development Company 3. ...Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2000 124th Avenue NE, Suite B-03, Bellevue, WA 98005 . (425) 454-6060 Rebecca Davidson (contact) 4. Date checklist prepared: August 11, 1997 � I 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Renton Development Services Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin construction Fall 1997 7. Do you have any plans for future additions,expansion;or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. We will be concurrently applying for a lot line adjustment with adjacent property to the east; also under our ownership. 8. List any environmental information you klow about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. See attached "Wetland Reconnaissance" letter 9. Do know whether applications are pendingfor governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Only Lot Line Adjustment referred to in #7 above 10. List a!ny governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Site Plan Approval Building Permit • 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. We will be constructing a 16,500 SF retail center, specializing in auto aftelr-care users, on a 63,900 square foot site located at 501 SW 10th, Renton. 2 Environmental Checklist 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and -range if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,-provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if • reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with anypermit applications related to this checklist. See Site Plan Approval Permit Submittals B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. . General description of the site (circle one); flat;tollin. hilly,.steep:slopes,••:mountainous, other - • b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) The steepest slope on site is approximately 9%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site.(for example, clay, sand,::gravel,•peat,. muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and.note any prime farmland. Site is underlain by very loose to loose silty sand and soft silts (some clay) with several thin peat and organic silt lenses. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Not to our knowledge e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 3,500 cubic yards of structural fill material from an approved off—site source will be imported to prepare subgrade for building and parking area. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The erosion potential on site is moderate. Potential for erosion always exists upon clearing of vegetation, however, temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be implemented g. About what percent of the site will be covered with Impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Approximately 70 to 75 per cent of the site will be covered by impervious surface. 3 Environmental ChedIdist h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Clearing will be limited to those areas necessary for construction. A temporary erosion and sledimentation control plan. will be prepared for the site to reduce and control erosion. 2. AIR • a. ..-- What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.;dust,automobile, ;odors,:industrial wood smoke) du ng construction and when the project.is'completed? If ..any,-generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None b. Are there any off-site sources of -mission or odor that-may-affect your'proposal? If so, generally describe. No c.. Proposed measures to reduce or 'ontrol emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None are necessary r I 3. WATER I I a. ' Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body op or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds,-wetlands)?• .If yes,-describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Immediately adjacent to the east and south of the project, an existing drainage ditch conveys storm runoff from the north and discharges to the southwest corner of the project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe aI d attach'available plans. Parking and drive area shall be construction over and adjacent to existing drainage ditch. • 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Not applicable 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. • No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 4 • Environmental Checklist - 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground Water: 1) - Will ground water be.withdrawn,.or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground.from septic tanks or other sources, .if.any (for.example: Domestic sewage;_.industrial,::containing:.the=following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general'size'ofthe'system,:the-number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None will be discharged c. Water Runoff(including storm water): . 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water).and..method. of..collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters, If so, describe. The source of runoff will be from rainfall only.; Surface water runoff currently drains into existing drainage ditch along south side of property and drains westerly to an existing storm drainage pipe system. Storm drainage runoff from project will be collected with a storm drainage system and discharged into a proposed detention system with controlled release discharge into the existingdrainage ditch 2) Could waste material enter ground or Surface waters? .If.so,.generally descrie. along south side of project. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: A temporary erosion control plan will be implemented during construction per City standards to reduce and control surface water impacts. Detention and water quality measures will also be provided to release surface runoff to the existing system at the pre—development runoff rates in accordance 4. PLANTS with City standards. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: x deciduoustree:r'-Q b maple, aspen, other (cottonwood) evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain • wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants:water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation • b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All vegetation will be removed, except the two percent reserved for wildlife habitat. (See 4d.) 5 • Environmental Checklist • c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None to our knowledge d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Site is within a native preservation district. Two percent of site area is reserved in native vegetation for wildlife habitat. Final landscape will include vegetation. native to the Puget Sound area. 5. ANIMALS a. • ',-:Circle any birds and animals which have been observed•on-or-near,thersite-or•are known to be on or near the site: (see next page) Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver other i Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, Shellfish, other • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain No i I d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None needed 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric and natural gas energy sources are anticipated for use in this project. Electric air conditioning, lighting and some infra—red heaters will require electricity; heating will be provided by gas powered roof units for office areas and ceiling unit heaters for semi heated warehouse/service areas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No • c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? • List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures will include compliance with the state non residential energy code, re: insulation, lighting, HVAC equipment motors, etc. in addition, water heaters, plumbing fixtures, etc. will be energy efficient, low water usage type. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 6 , i. • • Environmental Checklist a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Not applicable 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not applicable I • 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Not applicable b. Noise • 1) 'What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Minimal noise levels from trucks and grading equipment 2) What types and levels of noise would be createdby or associated with the project on a • short-term or a long-term basis'(for example: traffic,.i construction,-;operation;••other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Minimal construction noise, as described above, would only be during weekdays, 7am — 4pm. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: . Not necessary 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is vacant land, with office buildings on the adjacent properties to both the east and west. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. . None d. - Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? Not applicable • e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Arterial Commercial (CA) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? EAV 7 Environmental Checklist - • g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No I i i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 15 — 20 people would work at the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project'displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None needed • I. .Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is.:compatible:with.existing::and:projected land uses and plans, if any: None needed 9. HOUSING • a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate',whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Not applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: • Not applicable 10. AESTHETICS a. ' What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed. Proposed height is 25 feet and exterior building materials will be glass roll—up doors and stucco. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or(control aesthetic impacts, if any: Not applicable 8 „I Environmental Checklist 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Not applicable b. - Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No C. :What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect..your.proposal? None d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None needed 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities•are-in the immediate'vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?,If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts.on.recreation,°°.including :recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Not applicable 13. HISTORIC.AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,generally describe. No I ” b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Not applicable c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Not applicable 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Site is between S.W. 10th Street to the north and Grady Way to the south. Proposed access to both streets are on the west side of the site, as illustrated on the site plan. 9 . Environmental Checklist b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, a half—block to the east along Grady Way c. - How How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the ' project eliminate? 57 parking stalls . d. . ''.-Will the proposal require any new roads or.streets;'or;improvements:to,existing:roads or streets,:not including driveways?. If•so,:generallyr,describe.:(indicate:.whether,.public or private? No • e. Will the project use (or occuj in -the .immediate::vicinity=of);:water;:rail, •or-air transportation? If so, generally describe. • No ;' f. - ....How many:vehicular Arips;per di d-'y:.would be)generateby.:the :completed project?... If known,indicate when peak volu es would occur. Approximately 220 vehicular trips per day g. .Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: I � 15. PUBLIC SERVICES i a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,generally describe. No b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Not applicable 16. UTILITIES • a. Circl: utili •:s currei_Itly availabl'e at the site: electricity' iatural gp3(^, � service-1 elephon- anitary sewer septic system, other. 10 Environmental Checklist b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. • — Power and gas will be provided by Puget Sound Energy — Water and sewer will be provided by City of Renton — Telephone service will be provided by U.S. West Communications — Television cable service will be provided by TCI Cablevision of Washington C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non- significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack o II disclosure on my part. Proponent: // Name Printed: _--Ka I c�f Date: gie j ( 1197 11 Environmental Checklist D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEETS FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS • (1 hese>sheets;should only.:.:=be used:::;for:act ons ;mvolving :decis►ons orr_:;pollc.es; ::plans:;;and programs..You do;not need to.fill<out:these`sheets:for' ro ect actions Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list Of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly-and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;.emissions to air;.production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? . i • Proposed measures,to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: . 1 • 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study)' for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands? . Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: • ' I 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: I ' 12 c . 1111 ■ 1 111. ► TALASAEA RECEIVED CONSULTANTS AUG 2 6 -1997 • DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEV April 10, 1997 CITY OF RENTON TAL-359 Mr. Chris Scalzo JCR Development Co. 2000 - 124th Ave. NE, B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 SUBJECT: Wetland Reconnaissance on KIBO Site Located in the City of Renton, WA. Dear Chris: At your request, on April 2, 1997 I conducted a wetland reconnaissance on the approximately one-acre KIBO site located on SW 10th Street in the City of Renton, Washington. The site is situated south of SW 10th Street, north of SW Grady Way, and west of the Plaza 451 Building. No wetlands were identified on the site utilizing the methodology outlined in the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, 1987. The site consists primarily of a young (< than 6" dbh) monotypic stand of black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) with an understory of Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). A power line easement runs from east to west though the southern portion of the site. Vegetation within this easement is periodically maintained and consists largely of Himalayan blackberry, reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), and Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius). The site is located within an area of high disturbance and appears to have either been historically filled or effectively drained in the past. Soil borings taken throughout the site consisted of highly mottled silt barns and silt clays that appear to be either historic fill material, or possibly relic hydric soils that are now effectively drained. Although the reconnaissance was conducted following a heavy precipitation event during the early part of the growing season (i.e., generally the wettest time of the year), no evidence of inundation or soil saturation was observed. Two drainage ditches are located on or immediately adjacent to the property. The primary drainage ditch is located in the southern portion of the site, and flows from east to west within the power line easement. The on-site portion of this ditch is the only portion of the drainage in the vicinity of the property that has not been piped. The City of Renton, through its Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Ordinance, only regulates those ditches that convey stream flows that occurred,\prior to channelization. This ditch, therefore, would probably not be regulated as a stream by the City, since it appears that stormwater flows within the ditch are a result of ' Resource 'Q Environmental Planning I 15020 Bear Creek Road Northeast • Woodinville, Washington 98072 • Bus: (206) 861-7550 • Fax: (206) 861-7549 Mr. Chris Scalzo April 10, 1997 Page 2 increased runoff from impermeable surfaces associated with the surrounding development. A smaller secondary drainage ditch flows from north to south just beyond the site's eastern boundary. This ditch discharges into the primary ditch in the southeastern corner of the site. At the time of the field investigation, several inches of stagnant water was observed in the ditch. It appears that this ditch would also not be regulated by the City, since it did not convey stream flows prior to channelization. I hope that you will find this information helpful, and that it will assist you in your development plans for this site. It is my recommendation, however, that prior to proceeding with any detailed site planning, the regulatory status of any potential sensitive areas on the site be verified by the City. In the meantime, if you have any questions, or require any additional information, please call me at (206) 861-7550. Sincerely, TALASAEA CONSULTANTS 1 Jolh Altmann Ecologist GENERAL CONTRACTORS /O a®p-- ECE,I E Bir 6 -1997 c , w i 1 I 11 POU/SHCC w ;_ AND ASSOCIATES,INC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING 1-11WW.AL9 0 0 / 3260-118TH AVE.S.E.,SUITE 1000 CITY OF RENTON • i ` 8 P.O.BOX 37 ;' BELA 98009 �- 2061746.10 W W 146-1000 August 19, 1997 Rebecca Davidson JCR Development Company 2000 - 124th Avenue N.E., B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: 501 Center Construction Mitigation Description Site Plan Approval Submittal Dear Rebecca: We have visited the site of the proposed Renton Auto Center. The following address the Construction Mitigation section of the Site Plan Approval Submittal you provided us on August 4. Please let us know if we can be of additional assistance. 1) Proposed construction dates: • Start: November 1 , 1997 • Completion: March 1 , 1997 2) Hours of operation: • Monday-Friday, 7:00 am to 4:00 pm 3) Proposed hauling/transportation routes: • Site access would be through the west parking lot of the Plaza 451 Building. Any export of soil, import of fill or aggregates and the stocking of construction materials would be via S.W. 10th Street, south on Lind Avenue to Interstate 405. 4) Measures to be implemented to minimize dust, traffic and transportation impacts, mud, noise, and other noxious characteristics: • Given the proposed fall/winter construction time frame, dust is unlikely to be a problem. Dump trucks and delivery vehicles leaving the site will have their tires/wheels cleaned prior to entering the S.W. 10th St. corridor. In addition the limits of grading will be bordered by a T.E.S.C.P. approved silt fence. Seattle:206/621-8219 FAX•206/746-3737 CC01-FO-US-HA-C1580D • The size and construction type of the proposed structure will not require a high level of vehicle deliveries to the site. However, flag persons may be used if utility work in the S.W. 10th St. corridor requires open cutting the asphalt. This type of work should be limited. • The site borders the busy S.W. Grady Way and is surrounded by commercial properties. The transmission of noise generated by construction activities should not be a concern. • The proposed structure will not require a construction process that contains, "noxious characteristics". Sincere , Eric Jones Project Manager EJ:st G WATA\ERIC\PENIDINGWCRR91C.WWPD DRIVE WAY /1-' .'-- ‘e l'icez4,4744/..f.‹.y' SOL T- W7ST 1 Otn ST :--------7 CB I . — i , lr CONC. a - — DRIVE DRIVE L_ <, - 7 -- ,,, WAY t.‘) PROPOSED INGRESS/ LOT 3 - .--• .. • al EGRESS EASEMENT . i ' m •. , .- • S.P. 8105149003 - ' ! T. ....._...,., , 25' • 24' <..1 501 CENTER i , , m 00 6'KIS'EN1NY . I MIC1 (4r1 ft.:1 /4 I§ TAX LOT 192305908407 / '' co.. . m 1 1 / ica.D ..,-7 , f 25' I I 5' 24' 4///,/,,,,,/,../ • --------------err— ..-//-.//.,-/. Z co. ..--' •. / / z / /Is) , ..r._ PROPOSED INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT --• --- 4 OH OH . / 1 , CI j 0 . V - - - - - - - . - - - - j 0 --. 376.00' OH ON g OH-- OH 1 - D.CONC.SIDEWALK ;-1 • SOJT---- W=ST GRADY WAY 6' CONO, Ii4 DRIVE DRIVE WAY, WAY - • - . , . . GO _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ mCE1VED DE Lvr�'i�iV 1'PLANNING - CITY OF RENTON GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY ' . 501, SOUTHWEST 10TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON. E-7694 1- - May 1997 .. . 13, l . PREPARED FOR JOHN C.,BADOVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY [- Ray o d A. Co a Staff Engineer ASM� • ZONAL ' rExriF>:II t,h,t 1 , s l-_ Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Manager of Geotechnical Services • f- Earth Consultants, Inc. S • 1805 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite 201 Bellevue, Washington 98005 (206) 643-3780 . - IMPORTANT_ INFORMATION - - ABOUT YOUR - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT F More construction problems are caused by site subsur- technical engineers who then render an opinion about face conditions than any other factor. As troublesome as overall subsurface conditions,.their likely reaction to subsurface problems can be, their frequency and extent proposed construction activity,and appropriate founda- have been lessened considerably in recent years.due in tion design. Even under optimal circumstances actual large measure to programs and publications of ASFE/ conditions may differ from those inferred to exist, The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in because no geotechnical engineer, no matter how the Geosciences. - qualified,and no subsurface exploration program, no The following suggestions and observations are offered matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden by • to help you reduce the geotechnical-related delays, earth, rock and time:The actual interface between mate- cost-overruns and other costly headaches that can rials may be far more gradual or abrupt than a report occur during a construction project. indicates.Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from predictions. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated, but steps can be taken to help minimize their A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING impact. For this reason, most experienced owners retain their REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET geotechnical consultants through the construction stage, to iden- tify variances, conduct additional tests which may be ' OF PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS needed, and to recommend solutions to problems A geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsur- faceencountered on site. exploration plan designed to incorporate a unique set of project-specific factors. These typically include: SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS . the general nature of the structure involved, its size and CAN CHANGE configuration; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; physical concomitants such as Subsurface conditions may be modified by constantly- access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities, changing natural forces. Because a geotechnical engi- ' and the level of additional risk which the client assumed neering report is based on conditions which existed at by virtue of limitations imposed upon the exploratory the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions ' program. To help avoid costly problems, consult the should not be based on a geotechnical engineering report whose geotechnical engineer to determine how any factors adequacy may have been affected by time. Speak with the geo- . which change subsequent to the date of the report may technical consultant to learn if additional tests are affect its recommendations. advisable before construction starts. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and Unless your consulting geotechnical engineer indicates otherwise, your geotechnical engineering report should not natural events such as floods, earthquakes or ground- be used: water fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions •When the nature of the proposed structure is and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical changed, for example, if an office building will be report.The geotechnical engineer should be kept erected instead of a parking garage. or if a refriger- apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to ated warehouse will be built instead of an unre- determine if additional tests are necessary. frigerated one; •when the size or configuration of the proposed GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES ARE 1 structure is altered; PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES •when the location or orientation of the proposed AND PERSONS structure is modified; •when there is a change of ownership. or Geotechnical engineers' reports are prepared to meet •for application to an adjacent site. the specific needs of specific individuals. A report pre- Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems pared for a consulting civil engineer may not be ade- which may develop if they are not consulted after factors consid- quate for a construction contractor, or even some other ered in their report's development have changed. consulting civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise. this report was prepared expressly for the dient involved and expressly for purposes indicated by the client. Use MOST GEOTECHNICAL "FINDINGS" by any other persons for any purpose,or by the client ARE PROFESSIONAL ESTIMATES for a different purpose, may result in problems. No indi- • • vidual other than the client should apply this report for its Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions intended purpose without first conferring with the geotechnical only at those points where samples are taken,when engineer. No person should apply this report for any purpose they are taken.'Data derived through sampling and sub- other than that originally contemplated without first conferring sequent laboratory testing are extrapolated by geo- with the geotechnical engineer. r i - 1 _ _ it ,,,`e 41 r. t ,4 Earth Consultants Inc. 1 / ihl, a Geotechnical Engineers.Geologists,&Environmental scientists I r - 1 . May 13, 1997 E-7694 I L. John C. Radovich Development Company . '_.. 2000 - 124th Avenue Northeast, B-103 Bellevue, Washington 98005 I Attention: Mr. Chris Scalzo i Dear Mr. Scalzo: 1 Wel are pleased to submit our report titled "Geotechnical Engineering Study, 501 Southwest 10th Avenue, Renton, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, selective laboratory tests, and engineering analyses. We' understand two possible options are being considered for the proposed development. At ' this time a paved parking lot or a 12,000 square foot retail building are being considered. Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed developments are _ geotechnically feasible. Silt and silt with sand fill was predominantly encountered to depths ' — with silt were encountered.. Below depths of approximately ten (10) to twelve (12) feet, medium dense soil conditions were predominantly encountered. In our opinion, the proposed retail building can be supported on conventional spread and continuous footings bearing on at least two feet of structural fill, provided a successful sur1. charge program is completed in the building area. The pavement section for the proposed paved parking lot can be supported on a one foot subbase consisting of compacted existing L fill or structural fill. Recommendations for foundation support and pavement sections are contained in the following sections of this report. The recommendations contained in this report should be incorporated into the final design recommendations. We appreciate this opportunity to have been of service to you. If you have any questions, or if vie can be of further assistance, please call. -_ Respectfully submitted, 1 EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. L i Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. • Manager of Geotechnical Services ' "A"lk""Kml. 1805-.136th Place N.E.,Suite 201,Bellevue,Washington 98005 Bellevue(206)643-3780 Seattle(206)464-1584 FAX(206)74-608-60 Tacoma(206)272-6608 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS - - E-7694 PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 T General 1 f ' Project Description 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 Surface 1 Subsurface 2 Groundwater 2 Laboratory Testing 2 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3 General 3 Site Preparation and General Earthwork 4 Surcharge Program 5 Foundations • 6 Slab-on-Grade Floors 7 Seismic Design Considerations 7 Excavations and Slopes 8 Site Drainage 9 Utility Support and Backfill 9 Pavement Areas 10 LIMITATIONS 11 Additional Services 11 • APPENDICES Appendix A Field Exploration Appendix B Laboratory Test Results ILLUSTRATIONS Plate 1 Vicinity Map Plate 2 Test Pit Location Plan Plate 3 Typical Settlement Marker Detail Plate 4 Typical Footing Subdrain Detail Plate 5 Utility Trench Backfill Plate Al Legend Plates A2 through A7 Test Pit Logs Plate B1 Grain Size Analysis Plate B2 Atterberg Limits Test Data Earth Consultants, Inc. {_ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING. STI. - 501 SOUTHWEST 10TH STREET RENTON, WASHINGTON E-7694 • INTRODUCTION General This report presents the results of the geotechnical engineering study completed by Earth i Consultants, Inc. (ECI) for the property located at 501 Southwest 10th Street, Renton, Washington. The general location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Plate 1 . The purpose of this study was to explore the subsurface conditions at the site, and based on the conditions encountered, develop geotechnical recommendations for the proposed site developments. At the time our study was performed, our exploratory locations were approximately as shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. Project Description We understand a paved parking lot or a 12,000 square foot retail building are currently being proposed for the property. We anticipate some raising of site grades will be required to complete either of the proposed developments. The retail development will be a one story structure consisting of masonry or wood frame construction. At the time this report was written, specific structural design information was not available for the proposed retail development. However, based on our experience with similar projects, we anticipate wall loads will be in the range of two (2) to four (4) kips per lineal foot, and the slab-on-grade floor loads will be in the range of one hundred fifty (150) pounds per square foot. If'any of the above design criteria are incorrect or change, we should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report. In any case, ECI should be retained to perform a'general review of the final design. ( SITE CONDITIONS • • Surface The property is located at 501 Southwest 10th Street, in Renton, Washington (see Plate 1, Vicinity Map). The subject property is approximately one acre in size, and is roughly rectangular shaped. Southwest 10th Street and Highway 405 border the property on the north and south, respectively, and office buildings border the property on the east and west. The topography along the majority of the property is relatively flat, with the exception of the ( south and east ends of the property where two ditches parallel the property lines. The site L is' heavily vegetated with deciduous trees and low lying ground cover. I i Earth Consultants, Inc. 1. ' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEEF STUDY • John C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 May 13, 1997 Page 2 Subsurface The site was explored by excavating six test pits at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the Test Pit Logs, Plates A2 through A7, for a more detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. The following is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Silt and silt with sand fill was predominantly encountered to depths of approximately two feet at our test. pit locations (Unified Classification ML) Below the fill, varying deposits of loose silt (ML), silty sand (SM), and sand with silt (SP-SM) were encountered. Below depths of approximately ten (10) to twelve (12) feet, predominantly medium dense soil conditions were encountered. Groundwater Moderate to heavy groundwater seepage was encountered at varying depths below the existing ground surface at our test pit locations. Multiple seepage zones were encountered between depths of approximately two to six feet. At the time of our exploration, the groundwater table was estimated to be at a depth of approximately six feet. Groundwater levels, however, are not static, therefore fluctuations in the level and rate of seepage can be expected depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and the seepage rate is greater•in the wetter winter months (typically October through May). If requested, a more detailed study of seasonal groundwater fluctuations at the site can be conducted. Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify I the field soil classification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering l�- characteristics of the soil encountered. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. Tie results of laboratory tests performed.on specific samples are provided at the appropriate sample depth on the individual test pit logs. It is important to note that these test results may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding our engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by others. In'accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for this project will be discarded after a period of fifteen days following completion of this report unless we are otherwise directed in writing. Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEE IG STUDY John C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 May 13, 1997 Page 3 1 ` DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General • Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion that the proposed developments can be constructed generally as planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. The critical geotechnical aspects of the planned developments are associated with foundation soil support, reducing post-construction settlements, and providing a competent pavement subgrade. The proposed 12,000 square foot retail building can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing on at least two feet of structural fill, provided a successful surcharge program is completed inj the building area. The purpose of the surcharge, program is to induce primary settlements within the underlying compressible soils prior to the start of construction. We recommend a surcharge depth of two feet in the proposed building area. Recommendations for placing and monitoring the surcharge, are presented in the "Surcharge Program" section of the report. Recommendations for structural fill placement and foundation support are presented in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork," and "Foundations" sections of the report. When the anticipated post-surcharge related settlements have reached a tolerable range, the surcharge can be removed and used as fill elsewhere on site, if necessary. Surcharge ultimately intended to be used as structural fill should consist of a free-draining granular soil. Fine grained or moisture-sensitive soils used as surcharge will need to be protected from wet { weather conditions, if the soil is ultimately intended to be used as structural fill. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at our test pit locations, we estimate the surcharge induced settlements will be in the range of approximately two to three inches. The pavement section for the proposed parking area can be supported on a one foot subbase consisting of compacted existing fill or structural fill. Due to the moisture-sensitive nature of the existing fill, compacting the fill to the requirements of structural fill may be difficult if the fill is above its optimum moisture content at the time of construction. Recommended • pavement sections for light and heavy traffic loadings are presented in the "Pavement Areas" section of the report. ( This report has been prepared for specific application to this project only and in a manner 1.,.., consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area for the exclusive use of John C. Radovich Development Company and their representatives. No warranty, expressed (_ or implied, is made. This report, in its entirety, should be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. [.. i Earth Consultants, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY JOhn C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 rMay 13, 1997 Page 4 Site Preparation and General Earthwork IThe building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of organic matter and other deleterious material. Abandoned utility pipes should be plugged or removed so that the pipe { does not provide a conduit for water. Once the area has been stripped, the ground surface where structural fill,. foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be observed by a representative of ECI. Proofrolling may be necessary to identify and delineate loose or unstable areas in the building and pavement areas. Proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of ECI. Areas that are found to be yielding or unstable should be repaired either by re-compacting the area, or overexcavating the unstable soils and replacing with structural fill. The use of a woven geotextile placed on the overexcavated surface may be useful in bridging over unstable areas. During dry weather, any non-organic compactible soil can be used as structural fill. Fill for use during wet weather should consist of a fairly well graded granular material having a maximum size of three inches and no more than five percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve based on the minus 3/4-inch fraction. Due to the moisture-sensitive nature of the native soil, compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moisture is significantly above its optimum condition at the time of construction. Due to the fine-grained nature of the native soil, wet weather conditions may adversely impact the earthwork phase of construction. Exposed native surfaces will degrade when exposed to moisture, potentially impacting the workability of the soil, and possibly the mobility of on-site equipment. Exposed surfaces should be graded to allow for drainage of the site. Water should not be allowed to collect and pond in construction areas. To help stabilize native surfaces impacted by wet weather conditions or groundwater seepage, cement treatment and cement kiln dust treatment can be considered. fill is defined as anycompacted fill placed under buildings, roadways, slabs, Structural p g Y pavements, or any other load-bearing areas. Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts not exceeding twelve (12) inches in loose thickness and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of its laboratory maximum dry density. The maximum dry density should be determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top.,twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. _ Earth Consultants, Inc. I GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEE= JG STUDY - John C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 - May 13, 1997 Page 5 Surcharge Program We recommend the proposed building area receive a two foot surcharge to induce settlements the underlying soils, and help reduce post-construction settlements: The two foot surcharge should. be placed above the proposed finish floor elevation of the building. We estimate primary settlements induced by the site fills and surcharge. will range between approximately two to three inches. The primary settlements induced by the site fills and surcharge should be complete approximately two to four weeks after the surcharge is placed. The actual time period for the primary settlements to occur, however, will depend on the rate acid amount of settlement measured in the field. The surcharge material should have a unit weight of at least 120 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). 'The surcharge should extend at least three feet beyond the perimeter of the proposed building footprint. The side slopes of the surcharge should not be inclined any steeper than 1 H:1 V (Horizontal:Vertical). As previously mentioned, surcharge ultimately intended to be used as structural fill should consist of a free draining granular soil. Fine grain or moisture-sensitive soils used as surcharge will need to be protected from, wet weather conditions, if the soil is ultimately intended to be used as structural fill. Ini order to verify the magnitude of settlement, a monitoring program should be performed. The monitoring program should include placement of a series of settlement markers on the existing site subgrade before any-fill is placed. The settlement markers should be monitored - through completion of fill placement, and continue until settlements cease or are considered within tolerable limits. More specific details of this program are presented below: , • Settlement markers should be placed on the native subgrade of the proposed building area prior to placement of any fill. Four to six settlement markers can be used for the proposed building area. ECI can supply and install these markers. (A typical detail is provided on Plate 3). • A baseline reading is obtained on each marker and is referenced to a temporary benchmark located on a feature that will be unaffected by the fill-induced settlements. • The site fills and surcharge are then placed. Settlement readings are taken at relatively short intervals during this process, since this phase generates relatively large and rapid settlements. • Once the fill operation is complete, readings are obtained on a periodic basis, typically weekly, until the settlement ceases or is judged by the geotechnical engineer to be within tolerable limits. l Earth Consultants, Inc. 1 - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY Jbhn C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 May 13, 1997 Page 6 } • Each set of settlement readings are plotted graphically against time to determine the magnitude and rate of settlement, and are matched against the predicted magnitudes and rates to verify the accuracy of earlier estimates and to make any appropriate modifications. ECI should be retained to acquire the settlement readings. If you prefer to use a surveyor to collect these readings, measurements should be provided to us as quickly after their acquisition as possible for plotting and interpretation. This will help avoid any misinterpretation or misunderstanding regarding the success of the surcharge program. To help ensure the accuracy of the settlement readings, the integrity of the settlement markers must be maintained. In our experience, earthwork equipment (dozers and trucks) often damage settlement markers. The damaged markers require replacement, which adds to the project costs. Additionally, damaged an replaced markers result in less reliable settlement data To avoid this, the project specifications should include a requirement that the earthwork contractor is required to immediately replace any damaged settlement marker and have the settlement readings re-obtained at his own cost. This requirement makes the earthwork contractor more conscious of the importance of the monitoring program and will aid in maintaining the integrity of the program. Foundations Assuming compliance with the recommendations outlined in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork," and "Surcharge Program" sections of this report, the proposed structure may be supported on a conventional spread and continuous footing foundation bearing on at least two feet of structural fill. All footing overexcavations should be observed by a representative of __ ECI prior to placement of structural fill. The use of a geotextile, or a combination of a geotextile and rock ballast may be necessary to stabilize overexcavated surfaces. The structural fill should extend a horizontal distance of at least one foot beyond the edges of the proposed footing. Exterior foundations elements should be placed a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations can be placed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of slab, except in unheated areas, where interior foundation elements should be founded at a minimum depth of eighteen (18) inches. • l.. Earth Consultants, Inc. i GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEE IG STUDY - - John C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 jMay 13, 1997 Page 7 With foundation support obtained as described, an allowable soil bearing capacity of two thousand five hundred (2,500) pounds per square foot (psf) may be used. This value of allowable soil bearing capacity incorporates a theoretical factor-of-safety in excess of three against actual shear failure. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of eighteen (18) and twenty-four (24) inches, respectively. Assuming compliance with the recommendations for the footing overexcavations and the building surcharge, total settlement of one inch and differential settlement of three-quarters of one inch is anticipated for the building. Most of the anticipated settlements should occur during construction as dead Toads are applied. Horizontal loads can be resisted by friction between the base of the foundation and the supporting soil, and by passive soil pressure acting on the face of the buried portion of the foiundation. For the latter, the foundation excavation must be backfilled with structural fill. For frictional capacity, a coefficient of 0.40 may be used for foundations elements bearing on granular structural fill. For passive earth pressure, the available resistance can be computed using an equivalent fluid pressure of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). These lateral resistance values are allowable values, a factor-of-safety of 1 .5 has been included. As movement of the foundation element is required to mobilize full passive resistance,the passive resistance should be neglected if such movement is not acceptable. Slab-on-Grade Floors Slab-on-grade floors should be supported on structural fill. Slab-on-grade floors should be designed by the structural engineer based on the anticipated loading and the subgrade support characteristics. For slab-on-grade floors supported on structural fill, a modulus of vertical .(, subgrade reaction of three hundred (300) pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for design. Tlie slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free-draining sand or gravel. In;areas where slab moisture is undesirable, a vapor barrier such as a 6-mil plastic membrane may be placed beneath the slab. Two inches of damp sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Seismic Design Considerations The Puget Lowland is classified as a Seismic Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code (UBC). The largest earthquakes in the Puget Lowland are widespread and have been subcrustal events, ranging in depth from thirty (30) to fifty-five (55) miles. Such deep events have exhibited no sulrface faulting. Structures are subject to damage from earthquakes due to direct and indirect action. Direct action is represented by shaking. Indirect action is represented by foundation soil failures and is typified by ground failure or liquefaction. iEarth Consultants, Inc. l GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY f-- John C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 May 13, 1997 Page 8 The UBC Earthquake regulations contain a static force procedure and a dynamic force procedure for design base shear calculations. Based on the encountered soil conditions, it is our opinion that a site coefficient of S3 = 1 .5 should be used for the static force procedure as; outlined in Section 1628 of the 1994 UBC. For the dynamic force procedure outlined in Section 1629 of the 1994 UBC, the curve for soft to medium clays and sands (Soil Type 3) should be used for Figure 16-3, Normalized Response Spectra Shapes. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which soils lose all shear strength for short periods of time during an earthquake. Groundshaking of sufficient duration results in the loss of grain to grain contact and rapid increase in pore water pressure, causing the soil to behave as a fluid. To have a potential for liquefaction, a soil must be cohesionless with a grain size distribution of a specified range (generally sands and silt); it must be loose to medium dense; it must be below the groundwater table; and it must be subject to sufficient magnitude and duration of gr�oundshaking. The effects of liquefaction may be large total and/or differential settlement for structures founded in the liquefying soils. Because the proposed building will be supported on structural fill, in our opinion, the proposed building will not experience a total loss of foundation support during a seismic event. Liquefying soils within the lower deposits of loose poorly graded sand with silt and silty sand may indirectly impact the structure in the form of ground settlements. However, a total loss in soil shear strength below the building foundation is, not expected to occur, provided the recommendations for foundation support contained in this report are incorporated into the final design. We anticipate settlements associated with these liquefiable zones may be in the range of! one to two inches. Excavations and Slopes Tl1e following information is provided solely as a service to our client. Under no circumstances should this information be interpreted to mean that ECI is assuming responsibility for construction site safety or the contractor's activities; such responsibility is not being implied and should not be inferred. - I 1- Ini no case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specified in local, state and Federal safety regulations. Based on the information obtained from our field exploration, the sOils encountered would be classified as Type C by OSHA. As such, temporary cuts greater than four feet in height should be sloped at an inclination no steeper than 1 .5H:1V. If slopes ofl these inclinations, or flatter, cannot be constructed, temporary shoring may be necessary. ( This shoring will help protect against slope or excavation collapse, and will provide protection to workers in the excavation. If temporary shoring is required, we will be available to provide shoring design criteria, if requested. Earth Consultants, Inc. _ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY John C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 May 13, 1997 Page 9 Permanent cut and fill slopes should be inclined no steeper than 2H:1V. Cut slopes should be observed by ECI during excavation to verify that conditions are as anticipated. Supplementary recommendations can then be developed, if needed, to improve stability, including flattening of slopes or installation of surface or subsurface drains. In any case, water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any slopes. Permanently-exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion and improve stability of the surficial layer of soil. Site Drainage The site must be graded such that surface water is directed off the site. Water must not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs or pavements. are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed by compacting the surface to reduce the potential for moisture infiltration into the soils. Final site grades must allow for drainage away from the building foundations. The ground should be sloped at a gradient of three percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings, except in paved areas, which can be sloped at a gradient of two percent. Footing drains should be installed around the perimeter of the proposed building. The footing drain should be installed at or just below the invert of the footing, with a gradient sufficient to. initiate flow. A typical detail is provided on Plate 4. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain system. Roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to discharge. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. ( Utility Support.and Backfill 1. Based on the soil conditions encountered at the time of our exploration, the native soil should provide adequate support for utilities. However, groundwater conditions could result in unstable soil in the bottom of utility trenches which would require remedial measures. If remedial measures are necessary to provide adequate utility support, the unsuitable soil could be overexcavated and replaced with a suitable ballast in conjunction with geotextile fabric. Specific recommendations can be provided if necessary, based on the conditions encountered during installation. • I - Earth Consultants, Inc. I j GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEEI;.,JG STUDY - John C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 May 13, 1997 Page 10 Utility trench backfill is a primary concern in reducing the potential for settlement along utility alignments; particularly in pavement areas. It is important that each section of utility line be adequately supported in the bedding material. The material should be hand tamped to ensure support is provided around the pipe haunches. Fill should be carefully placed and hand tamped to about twelve (12) inches above the crown of the pipe before any heavy 1 compaction equipment is brought into use. The remainder of the trench backfill should be placed in lifts having a loose thickness of less than twelve (12) inches. A typical trench backfill section and compaction requirements for load supporting and non-load supporting I_ areas is presented on Plate 5. Pavement Areas The adequacy of site pavements is related in part to the condition of the underlying subgrade. The proposed pavement sections should be supported on a one foot subbase meeting the requirements of structural fill described in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" section of this report. As previously mentioned, the subbase can consist of compacted existing fill or imported structural fill. Due to the moisture-sensitive nature of the existing fill, compaction may be difficult during wet weather conditions, or if the existing fill is above its optimum moisture content at the time of construction. The pavement subgrade should be in a firm and unyielding condition when proofrolled. In localized areas of soft, wet or unstable subgrade, a greater thickness of crushed rock may be needed to stabilize these localized areas. Cement treatment and cement kiln dust treatment may also be considered. The following pavement section for lightly-loaded areas can be used: • Two inches of asphalt concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) material, or • Two inches of AC over three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB) material. Heavier truck-traffic areas will require thicker sections depending upon site usage, pavement life and site traffic. As a general rule, the following sections can be considered for truck- trafficked areas: • Three inches of AC over six inches of CRB, or • Three inches of AC over four inches of ATB. These pavement thicknesses may be modified based on anticipated traffic loads and frequency. • Asphalt concrete (AC), asphalt treated base (ATB), and crushed rock base (CRB) materials shlould conform to WSDOT specifications. All rock base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the ASTM D-1557-78 laboratory test standard. i I Earth Consultants, Inc. • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEI- -,JG STUDY John C. Radovich Development Company E-7694 May 13, 1997 Page 11 LIMITATIONS • Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses, the available design information, and our experience and engineering judgement. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by other members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between test pits may vary from those encountered. The nature and extent of variations between our exploratory locations may not become evident until construction. If variations do appear, ECI should be requested to reevaluate the recommendations of this report and to modify or verify them in writing prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services As the engineer of record, ECI should be retained to perform a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the construction ' specifications. 1 ECI should also be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. We do not accept responsibility for the performance of the foundation or earthwork unless we are retained to review the construction drawings and specifications, and to provide construction observation and testing services. • I ' l � Earth Consultants, Inc. I - ,. - t. I i f • i ]'v8TH :art P ; $ • • ,.....-iz.•--:;:$:;•-...ire'''. il ':•::f•YiK'...•i.::"1,..,.:,_:',::.::-., '. • ' 1 f.:i •,,..2,-,..;;: :, J K�:�,i�M ' :ii' 3L. .• S tt,,n��.,Ct,3X' ihe -F.:ILLONY:kr/e., . ...,:;...7.,:.-7:-;•:.,,''.;.: X- a?y, CT i,' a `- MIMIC. r1Ct>X: lICD: )a'C` \ •-, r t. t!^ l lit, t'4 Y f•1 : + •(a j • ,A F ,a,� r3'§%i 1/t'- .....-'t3 !>> w' yyf �: 'fit .r�55,,,,r I. TC „, cA �"r'y , 'ca i.tiottfeel �qw� , ,1,'f. r• tom F ,,. •:•I f 1 t ;igs k, _, ', C'!" , 'yi � 41 +iJS�'_kart. .� „�y 1�, .Y i,. �`«„�:r.Y�..•�:a,a'� 9 "-a.y " Y t ,� 'K.a Fa., yr"%,.....- p- � � d �.>•rv`. o`o-s .'..cwr .,ay.,>> qq �t 1 tE ',» ''j ••... �• 'r� - .,,, r''r +`R fir' r '�G, 8 :Airi' .. _k •brie ry,`,, ..? �4t, .�r�a,. ."'1,',;}s - tT�MK�un �'� k_J,. Y+ate: Fa „ =s¢aY- F•, • _ _ 1.111 "� ,,,8/� r' ' c:4 .7,0 4;,:. \ or--1 gft „ .. ice'' F•ti 1: ,1?.';.-♦. ' w'y,+., •.a' �(i'•'. 1.ir,'b"�""t J4am k rs`'R'?s `r.-: .,s.'., - '-'va. • l � -I. � :.,..:-�; .. -• ... ��---:. ,,.,:rya,:-.<. - iuwr.��.,, :-cF:.r: ::��+.. _ -.:�,K;�; .,-:.1, - b'`W:� 47�.,t5£ 'C '�?'4- ;, '._?y:,•� � 1. . . . ,. ,:. . ...... ..._ .....„ ... ,,._ . ... • , . . ..r..7"i , l Plar,acr � ii: t /_ • '.. \40 •• is n r< %�fk+ • ,bppn.at�+ • 1: R .b1.Fl h,b kt 4,. "I ��y,, �.. + '' v '::.F • ,i . ram: },Q ���Jr' "'{{ r--- ; t , :,;, '7:, - \ :,F:`_o,E; ai•'; 1' 7- • • 3 g:t i'1,94"14?w"T. i _ • ? gi S s •'9 I . , ,, , itt-4: v3:6r,g r-. r y`,f �',,t . �`..::.... ::...:...:•, it., .,... ...: .- ..,: �'.E;:-�r,� �F q ,...,,< .mat; 1: r. i ;'� Sri'.4U' :. ` ' r� L 5 W Y €.. ,,. . , .....- Sit 2'3�.5'F'... _ .... s,.. ^'�; ��" 4 . -,. 1. .,, ..:.. .r.,,:.. .,, 111 .:A. y t i ItJ•. Ear ��$ Earth Consultants, Inc.. M ti Ir1J�t ) Geotechnical Engineers,Geologists&Environmental Scientists L. 1 ' Vicinity Map Reference: 501 - S.W. 10th Street 1:- 1 King County/Map 656 Renton, Washington _.. By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 1997 Drwn. GLS Date May'97 Proj. No. 7694 r Checked RAC Date 5/6/97 Plate 1 L 1 18 /it I s:44.Vity‘ .........,-.--7 /1 ,16 -.- TP-6 1 FF 1® 'TP-5 19 � I 4 TP-4 19 \,____-__ 1 -iTP-1 / \ \ \, TP-2I 16 11 17 1 1 -/- e 1 18 18 -_ 17 17 0 • LEGEND ITP-1 -:- Approximate Location of ECI Test Pit, Proj. No. 1 Approximate Scale E-7694, Apr. 1997 wini• 1-1 0 30 60 120ft. • `_ I Existing Building t 1;;;116;1.31:iii Test Pit Location Plan sEarth Consultants Inc. 501 - S.W. 10th Street i 4,0,Ntiv viu Geotecttnical Engineers.Geologists 8 Envirotrnenral Scientists Renton, Washington 1 Proj. No. 7694 I Drwn. GLS I Date May'97 Checked RAC 'Date 5/7/97 I Plate 2 I - _ SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE e NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING f • I y prI hre or preload sur charge a 9 i rcha e r or Preload Su 9 Fi ll Fill I ri II1=111. II1:5--- ' L..i' i11=..111=111= =111 =111= i 1 STANDARD NOTES 1) Base consists of 3/4 inch thick, 2 foot by 2 foot plywood with center drilled 5/8 inch diameter hole. 2) Bedding material, if required, should consist of Traction Sand. 3) -. Marker rod is 1/2 inch diameter steel rod threaded at both ends. L 4) Marker rod is attached to base by nut and washer on each side of base. 5) Protective sleeve-surrounding marker rod should.consist of 2 inch diameter plastic tubing. Sleeve is NOT attached to rod or base. [ 6) Additional sections of steel rod can be connected with threaded couplings. 7) Additional sections of plastic sleeve can be connected with press-fit plastic couplings. [7 8) Steel marker rod should extend at least 6 inches above top of plastic sleeve. . 9) Marker should extend at least 2 feet above top of fill surface. I L._ 1 ,I,t.;� ' .44\ TYPICAL SETTLEMENT MARKER DETAIL Earth Consultants Inc. 501 - S.W. 10th Street 11/ 'r' `, Cw-vtechnlol Engineers.Geologists a Environmental Scientists Renton, Washington • L Pro j. No. 7694 lDrwn. GLS Date May'97 Checked RAC IDate 57/97 'Plate 3 14- R +ti w, - . a l:', 0 1 w , , -4-------. Slope To Drain CI . . r - o •o .iri - d o� • 0 •O O -O in h min. -- - O 6 c �e a _ o 0 0 .o 0 a -�ti o' ,..• �-•�•i.;.,•° 'moo' o- o 0 18 inch min. e • o •.o . o . 4 inch min. ..a-' 7� :e o Diameter ... °• : . a •° o a o o - o Pipe Perforated . • • - - Wrapped in Drainage -'' • ° { Fabric ., _ • % f 2 inch min. i 2 inch min. / 4 inch max. _ 12 inch --,- r min.. I SCHEMATIC ONLY - NOT TO SCALE lI NOT A CONSTRUCTION DRAWING it LEGEND f Surface seal; native soil or other low permeability material. Fine aggregate for Portland Cement Concrete; Section 9-03.1(2) of the WSDOT Specifications. O Drain pipe; perforated or slotted rigid PVC pipe laid with perforations or 1 slots facing down;tight jointed;with a positive gradient. Do not use flexible corrugated plastic pipe. Do not tie building downspout drains into footing lines. Wrap with Mirafi 140 Filter Fabric or equivalent. • ii.i ��\: !�*� TYPICAL FOOTING SUBDRAIN DETAIL �� Earth Consultants Inc. 501 - S.W. 10th Street �quiNit11'N. �En dEnW � Renton, Washington Proj. No. 7694 I Drwn. GLS I Date May'97 Checked RAC [Date 5/7/97 I Plate 4 Non-Load Supporting Floor Slab or -r , I °: Areas Roadway Areas f� 1-4 .1 A : 5 r y., d sa . �85^ '_< o0 a o Varies O 00 0 0095 ° o. 0 0 o t :: 1 Foot Minimum F t 95� I A Backfill ac I - - (8 `90. varies .0� :0 d0 � . •00 o•o,o oo :0 o4o0Bedding oQ:u °'Q1� dC , e f ;ld .a'C • Varies :O.•000Oo: 'oo. oQ o: a� O. Q pOo°p o:'e ' O: o:°.O o . Qo.0o5O;pco0o9ooO0Q0 �0,.. .00;OQ a 0.0 o0 vnb9 o° Ooono�,o'0°. eb„oo-o�a°9 V LEGEND: • ;��J r' ..•`,i.`.. �.. p`{ As halt or Concrete Pavement or Concrete Floor Slab , Ono 0p.O ° a a,• Base Material or Base Rock . -..... • ,.• Backfill; Compacted On-Site Soil or Imported Select Fill ;;::.<+ :; Material as Described in the Site Preparation of the General Earthwork Section of the Attached Report.Text. Minimum Percentage of Maximum Laboratory Dry Density as 0Determined by ASTM Test Method D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor), Unless Otherwise Specified in the Attached Report Text. l-- N•. o.Day°-.0 Bedding Material; Material Type Depends on Type of Pipe and 5. °.o.'2,,p; Laying Conditions. Bedding Should Conform to the Manufacturers • Recommendations for the Type of Pipe Selected. L. .. ,p,.. 'OV. ,�*\ TYPICAL UTILITY TRENCH FILL �l Earth Consultants Inc. 501 - S.W. 10th Street l/ 1I, 1 Grogerhnicat Ern:perm Gmfogists&linvimxtmmalScieoasis Renton, Washington Proj. No. 7694 1 Drwn. GLS 1 Date May'97 Checked RAC 1 Date 5/7/97 I Plate 5 APPENDIX A ' FIELD EXPLORATION E-7694 Our field exploration was performed on April 29, 1997. Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by excavating six test pits to a maximum depth of fourteen (14) feet below the existing grade. Approximate test pit locations were determined by pacing from existing landmarks. The test pit locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. These approximate locations are shown on the Test Pit Location Plan, Plate 2. The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engineer from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative samples, measured groundwater levels, and observed pertinent site features. All samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate Al , Legend. Logs of the test pits are presented on Plates A2 through A7. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and tests of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. In actuality, the transitions may be more gradual. Earth Consultants, Inc. t._ - - _ . _ - • • I MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH LETTER SYMBOL SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION 9 d GW Well-Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand Gravel I e o 0 And Clean Gravels 1 4 n 4 n 4 n gw Mixtures, Little Or No Fines Gravelly (little or no fines) "I M ` 4 Gp Poorly-Graded Gravels,Gravel- Coarse Soils • • ■ Grained 1 gp Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines P- .... Soils More Than I 1 GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand- • 50% Coarse Gravels With i gm Silt Mixtures Fraction Fines(appreciable . Retained On amount of fines) # 1 I GC Clayey Gravels, Gravel-Sand- No. 4 Sieve Or ,. it gc Clay Mixtures Sand QQ . 'p oo 'a SW Well-Graded Sands, Gravelly And Clean Sand ' o o 0 o SW Sands, Little Or No Fines Sandy (little or no fines) ;;:;*;-djs! �;';:: +;•• i SP Poorly-Graded Sands, Gravelly More Than Soils :ei:i::w:'::% :::'!:: 50% Material ::;::.:4:::•:!>.;*:::;:{1:::`: Sp Sands, Little Or No Fines Larger Than No.200 Sieve More Than ? SM Silty Sands, Sand- Silt Mixtures . Size 50% Coarse Sands With _ Sm Fraction Fines(appreciable Paessing No.4 amount of fines) / SC SC :::.;,;.':: +' C Clayey Sands, Sand-Clay Mixtures �+' ML Very , ml Clayey FineInorganic Sands;Silts& ClayeyFine SiltsSands w/Rock Slight FlourPlasticitySilty Fine Silts Liquid Limit 1 CL Inorganic Clays Of Low To Medium Plasticity, Grained Clays ��� And Less Than 50 �� CI Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, Lean Organic Silts And Organic I I I I I I I I I OL pi Silty Clays Of Low Plasticity • MH Inorganic Silts, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine More Than mh Sand Or Silty Soils 50% Material Silts Liquid Inorganic Clays Of High Sieve Smaller And CH g y No.200 Sieve Clays Greater ThLimitan 50 Ch Plasticity, Fat Clays. Size / /� OH Organic Clays Of Medium To High l l ,� on Plasticity, Organic Silts `‘.2! `I! `� pT Peat, Humus, Swamp Soils Highly Organic Soils 2,. `t 4 `sue „`i pt With High Organic Contents I . Topsoil '4/4,4,4,4 Humus And Duff Layer �•�•••••• Hiyhl Variable Constituents Fill �•�•��•��• Y I The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature ( of the material presented in the attached logs. I I__ DUAL SYMBOLS are used to indicate borderline soil classification. C TORVANE READING,tsf I 2"O.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER qu PENETROMETER READING,tsf W MOISTURE,%dry weight 11 24" I.D. RING OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER { P SAMPLER PUSHED 1 - * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED Il WATER OBSERVATION WELL pcf DRY DENSITY,lbs.per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT,% 2 DEPTH OF ENCOUNTERED GROUNDWATER PI PLASTIC INDEX DURING EXCAVATION l 1 SUBSEQUENT GROUNDWATER LEVEL W/DATE I -i. Earth Consultants Inc. LEGEND I! \ l 1 (,coat IIIIIt.II,„,guit-crss,( �tlugisIs&c,ivlro.uhltIIi.,l SI.N:I,IISIS �� Proj. No. 7694 I Date May'97 !Plate Al t _ t. l - Test Pit Log - - Project Name: Sheet of • -.501 -S.W. 10th Street 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7694 RAC 4/24/97 TP-1 Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: I • N.W. Excavating Notes: • c .c _ tic Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Sod 4"-6":tall grass&blackberry w a m a �- . 1, bushes % al E W E 2 % ML FILL Brown SILT and SILT with sand, loose,wet 2 32.4 ML Brown sandy SILT, loose, wet • 3 - 4 -light seepage, some interbedded sand 60.6 5 -interbedded organics 6 Q SF-SM Predominantly poorly graded fine SAND with silt,wet to water bearing 20.6 :'�: o:b 7 8 ML Gray SILT, loose to very loose, saturated LL=39 PL=31 9 -moderate caving 5'-9' P1=8 43.9 10 11 65.3 12 -becomes increasingly dense 13 Test pit terminated at 13.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 6.0 feet during excavation. L N _ Test Pit Log c. -: Al Earth Consultants Inc. 501 -S.W. 10th Street G I / \ eolechnical Engineers,Geologists&Environmental scientists } Renton, Washington a Proj.No. 7694 Dwn. GLS Date Apr.'97 Checked RAC Date 5/12/97 Plate A2 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log- ,' • Project Name: Sheet of - r , •• .2,1501 -S.W. 10th Street 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Dater Test Pit No.: 7694 RAC 4/24/97 TP-2 _ Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: r 1 N.W. Excavating • Notes: • • F . j w r a .c v y c Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4"-6": blackberry bushes as a +- a (%) a 33 m u. a n 33 0 0 w f ♦♦ ML FILL Brown SILT and SILT with sand, loose,wet, some concrete and halt fragments 1 — •... • SM Brown to black silty fine to medium SAND with gravel, loose,wet,some 15.1 3 organics 4 SP-SM Grades to gray poorly graded fine SAND with silt, loose,wet to water <<Q: bearing, heavy seepage at 5.5' _ 26.5 r ': 5 -severe caving 5'-8' • `'p 6 — 2 • ;o:a 8 s ML Gray SILT and sandy SILT, loose to very loose, saturated 38.4 . 10 11 i;:.:;::" 12 SP Gray poorly graded fine to medium SAND, medium dense,water :ii o:» e bearing ,«u a ` 13 : ;:Q:::,o:::< ;,..o,::,.:: 14 Test pit terminated at 14.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 6.0 feet during excavation. [. . . L , Li a \ I N N v 0- dal; AI. Test Pit Log 1.1 ��l I1 Earth Consultants Inc. 501 -S.W. 10th Street r lll).,'11//\lir ceo�ec!"'`rat FY��aa Ceoio�b emlaonnrnml scientists ! Renton,Washington J CI- Proj.No. 7694 Own. GLS Date May'97 Checked RAC Date 5/12/97 Plate A3 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. 1 Test Pit Log - Project Name: - Sheet of { s„ f 501 -S.W. 10th Street 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7694 RAC 4/24/97 TP-3 Excavation Contactor. Ground Surface Elevation: N.W. Excavating Notes: • c t . ti c Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil &Sod 4"-6":tall grass&blackberry w a a •++ a. U 2 bushes (%) e 9 e u. a ea fD N G w N ML FILL: Brown SILT and SILT with sand, loose,wet 1 -some organic debris-charcoal ( 2 SM Brown to black silty fine SAND, loose,wet to saturated,trace gravel, 23.9 3 — some sandy silt 4 — ,;✓ 5 - ML Grades to predominantly gray sandy SILT, heavy seeapge s = • -moderate caving at 5'-8' 7 33.9 8 -predominantly silt 9 • 10 11 12 SP Gray poorly graded fine SAND, medium dense,water bearing e:;:;Q,A 13 r.:iEi2i::;a:•:: Test pit terminated at 14.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 6.0 feet during excavation. La N " l!Y` E�1: �(,1�� EarthConsutants Inc. Test Pit Log ; II14isL1�� 501 -S.W. 10th Street "l�"'`°"""'�'sa Renton,Washington Proj.No. 7694 Dwn. GLS Date May'97 Checked RAC Date 5/12/97 Plate A4 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, ( analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. - Test Pit Log _ Project Name: Sheet of 1501 -S.W. 10th Street 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7694 RAC 4/24/97 TP-4 rExcavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: N.W Excavating Notes: , • r o .c v rn o Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4"-6":tall grass&blackberry w a E 0. 4- E N bushes (%) " a o w a 2 a i rA G w H ML FILL:Brown SILT and SILT with sand, loose,wet 1 — 1 2 ---- ML Brown SILT,lose,wet to saturated 44.9 3 I 4 -heavy seeapge and severe caving at 4.5'-7' 5 • 6 Q -becomes very loose, predominantly sandy silt and silt, saturated f 7 64,4 8 ' -becomes loose L. 9 1 10 11 !!!;:ililSP Gray poorly graded fine to medium SAND, medium dense,water . • {_.: 27,7 bearing [ , :::::,.0i,„ 13 — Test pit terminated at 14.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 6.0 feet during excavation. iii . , H • ti in Test Pit Log a. Earth Consultants Inc. 501 -S.W. 10th Street I r ce° 'Y',ca'E,g''eers Geologists`Environmental Scientists Renton,Washington a- Proj.No. 7694 Own. GLS Date May'97 Checked RAC Date 5/12/97 Plate A5 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. Test Pit Log - _ .= Project Name: - Sheet of 1 • 1501 -S.W. 10th Street 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: 7694 RAC 4/24/97 TP-5 (� Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: f :. N.W. Excavating Notes: • o r m ; Surface Conditions: Depth of Topsoil&Sod 4"-6":tall grass&blackberry w L .D 4- . a U bushes lV 16 9 m a 9 ( N vi V • ML FILL:Brown SILT and SILT with sand, loose,wet ••••• 1 N2 ML Brown SILT and SILT with sand, loose, wet 46.0 3 -increasing sand, some silty sand 4 -severe caving 3'-8' SP-SM Grades to predominantly poorly graded fine SAND with silt,very loose, water bearing 25.3 is?sc 8 • ML Gray SILT, loose, saturated 47.2 10 11 • • 12 Test pit terminated at 12.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 6.0 feet during excavation. L: N N I ►! ��\; d4 Test Pit Log �i -- L d Earth Consultants Inc. 501 -S.W. 10th Street 4 `D rt, �ll1 voir Geosechnical Engine=Geologists&EnvircemerialSde"ists Renton,Washington I � a Proj.No. 7694 Dwn. GLS Date May'97 Checked RAC Date 5/12/97 Plate A6 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. - - - - _ - - - - - _ Test Pit Log - wt.Pioject Name: Sheet of • 501 -S.W. 10th Street 1 1 Job No. Logged by: Date: Test Pit No.: • 7694 RAC 4/24/97 TP-6 r- Excavation Contactor: Ground Surface Elevation: N.W. Excavating Notes: • _ .c - Depth of Topsoil &Sod 4"-6":tall grass&blackberry - -o Surface Conditions: W .13 4" • o. C.) .0 bushes • e (%) lLL3 413 te 3 L 13 ca ML FlW Brown to black SILT and SILT with sand, loose,wet, concrete is-g-ments 12"to 18" SM Brown silty fine to medium SAND, loose, moist to wet 22.6 3 ,11!• - 4 ML Grades to sandy SILT and SILT with sand 39.5 5 - 6 -becomes very,loose, saturated 7 -moderate caving 6'-9' • 35.1 8 -predominantly silt, loose LL=35 PL=28 P1=7 9 10 • 61.3 11 12 13 14 Test pit terminated at 14.0 feet below existing grade. Groundwater table encountered at 6.0 feet during excavation. N -I - • r;.. Test Pit Log AD,,, Earth Consultants Inc. 501 -S.W. 10th Street c mu.,,\up iirff Get's:clinical Engineer&Geologists&Envkannental Scientists Renton, Washington ' Proj.No. 7694 Dwn. GLS Date May'97 Checked RAC Date 5/12/97 Plate A7 Subsurface conditions depicted represent our observations at the time and location of this exploratory hole,modified by engineering tests, analysis and judgment. They are not necessarily representative of other times and locations.We cannot accept responsibility for the use or interpretation by others of information presented on this log. - I • • • APPENDIX B Laboratory Test Results E-7694 • L L_: Earth Consultants, Inc. 1. r__ ________ i_____^ _ - - ---- - - ---1 I ----1 ---1 -i SIEVE ANALYSIS HYDROMETER ANALYSIS 'U SIZE OF OPENING IN INCHES I NUMBER OF MESH PER INCH,U.S.STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN MM - O O 1LI (+Q� N �, — — — • — (y N_� v a m .r O tD O O G 0 0 O p O Q 0 0 O O O O O O O F z .- W 'R M N .-0 0 •- ai 03 g '- N M 4 2 8 O 9 N P. 90 10 ]0 - 3) 'O 80 a m - ' 0` m ^ m 70 l�` 30 U 01 a O --I A z TI 60 40 J m R. R. .+ \ 50 0 7 50 �\ o ea i CD b X * 40 60 CO ,gin w 30 70 m y L7 co 20 _ 80 "i 0 m a 10 J so 7d 0 i l l ll I T 1 1 1 III I1 11 I III I I I 1 I_ !ICI{p a �p a i 100 • M 0 O O 000 i00 o M N 0 CO (O ct M N r 00 Ul: Cl N •' O O O O O O O O 0 0 O . O rommo ! y M N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS • o O 99 0 0 rt 0 0 • Z COARSE I FINE COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE FINES co - _N COBBLES GRAVEL • SAND ul N i W N m N rt D Boring or DEPTH Moisture KEY USCS DESCRIPTION Content (%) LL PL' J r Test Pit No,.. (ft.) rt rr -< on cn p m m -u . N O TP-1 6.5 SP-SM Brown poorly graded SAND with silt 20.6 -- -- ia m 6-" TP-3 3 SM Brown silty SAND with gravel 23.9 -- -- i to I-I 0 1 TP-4 2.5 ML Brown SILT 44.9 -- -- too 80 i.� x 60 i w . z 1 40 "—A-Line cn • a. 20 a (3'�1 • CL-ML Gina • 0 20 40 60 80 100 LIQUID LIMIT 1 Natural Boring/ Depth Soil Classification USCS L.L. P.L. P I. Water Key Test Pit (ft) Content 0 TP-1 9.5 Gray SILT ML 39 31 8 40.0 ♦ TP-6 8 Gray SILT ML 35 28 7 36.3 Atterberg Limits Test Data d*, �\: /14�� 501 - S.W. loth Street Earth Consultants Inc. Renton, Washington ��1i(''r`��) ce«echnld a Environmental Scientists Proj. No. 7694 I Date May '97 1Plate B2 - - DISTRIBUTION' 4 Y E-7694 4 Copies John C. Radovich Development Company 2000 - 124th Avenue Northeast, B-103 ( Bellevue, Washington 98005 Attention: Mr. Chris Scalzo • • f • _ Earth Consultants, Inc. • C/It Chri8topher Brown A880ciate8� 879 Rainier Avenue N., 6uite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Fax 772-4321 The John C. Radovich Development Company 501 CENTER a Proposed Auto Retail Center at 501 S .W. 10th Street in the City of Renton • TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS • f c: q O63Q 000.E I'p 'Y"J "•e D�y }try.. W�"9 h.�! m}TJ �3Ksr� ° • • 0000. ‘ August 15, '1 997 atr}c RECEIVED • AUG 26 '1997 Traffic Engineers CAS Tran8portation.Planner8 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RENTON The Jonn C. Radovich Development Lompany 501 CENTER Proposed Auto Retail Center City of Renton TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Table of Contents Introduction & Purpose 1 . Location 2 . Project Description 2 . Transit 2 . Present Roadway System 4. Traffic Data 4 . Adjacent Land Uses 8 . Data References and Sources 8. Horizon Year Traffic 9 . Trip Generation 9 . Capacity Analysis 19 . Site Contribution to Traffic 20 . Traffic Control Devices 21 . Conclusions 21 . List of Figures Figure 1 Vicinity Map 3 . Figure 2 Current A.M. Peak Hour Volumes 5 . Figure 3 Current Noon Hour Volumes 6 . Figure 4 Current P .M. Peak Hour Volumes 7 . Figure 5 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour Volumes 10 . Figure 6 Year 2000 Noon Hour Volumes 11 . Figure 7 Year 2000 P .M. Peak Hour Volumes 12 . Figure 8 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Volumes W/Project 16 . Figure 9 Year 2000 Noon Volumes W/Project 17 . Figure 10 Year 2000 P.M. Peak Volumes W/Project 18 List of Tables Table I Trip Generation, Quick Lube Facilities 13 . Table II Trip Generation Rates, Quick Lube 13 . Table III Trip Generation, Auto Service/Repair 14. Table IV Trip Generation, Renton Auto Center 14. Table V Total Trip Generation, Renton Auto Center 15 . Table VI Levels of Service & Average Delay 19 . Appendix Level of Service Calculations with Geometry & Input Values CiiiiChristopher Atq. 7=01 wnf� A879 Rainier ue Renton, WA 98055-1380 1 L (206) 772-1188 The John C. Radovich Development Company i 501 CENTER 1 Proposed Auto Retail Center 501 S .W. 10th Street 1 City of Renton TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ; Introduction & Purpose ; The John C. Radovich Development Company is proposing the ! construction of a single building of some 15, 000 g. s. f. for an 1 "Auto Center" . The building as presently designed will include ; eight (8) service bays of which three (3 ) are expected to be ; used for quick automobile services particularly with respect to ; engine and chassis lubrication. The remaining five bays will ! most likely be for engine and/or transmission repair kinds of ; services . In a traffic sense the distinction between these two ; kinds of services is that the lubrication bays represent ! shorter duration and faster service with a larger clientele ; while the latter are of a much longer duration with a ! consequential fewer numbers of cars being handled. [ The site is on the north side of S .W. Grady Way, about three ( blocks west of Lind Avenue S .W. in the City of Renton. ; Although this kind of facility is a relatively low traffic ' generator the city has requested a traffic study to review the current and future intersection performance of S .W. Grady Way lat Lind Avenue S .W. including morning and afternoon peak hours land the noon hour as well . ; Given the above mandate, the purpose of this study is to obtain ; current average weekday a.m. , noon, and p.m. peak hour traffic ; data, to review the current traffic operations at this major ! signalized intersection over these time periods and review the ! commercial driveway serving the businesses on S .W. Grady Way. 1 jChristopher Brown a Associate I -1 - 879 Rainier Avenue N., &rite A-201s Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Location 1 IAs noted above, the site is located in the City of Renton ' almost two blocks to the west of Lind Avenue S .W. on S .W. Grady , Way approximately opposite the west boundary of the Saturn dealership. Its formal address will be 501 S .W. 10th Street. The site ' s general vicinity is shown on Figure 1 , page 3 . Proiect Description ; The proposed "Auto center" will be in a single building of some 15, 000 g.s . f. and will be constructed with eight (8) service bays . : About 60 to 70 parking stalls will be provided depending on final site and building configuration although this kind of business is not a major parking generator. Access to the site will be from a single driveway on S .W. Grady Way with a secondary or minor access also being provided to the , rear of the site onto S .W. 10th Street. The site is vacant at the present time so no significant remedial work is anticipated that might otherwise impact current traffic operations along S .W. Grady Way. ! Transit ; While the site is served by Metro transit routes 108, 110, 153, 163 and 340 it is not expected to produce significant demand for transit services . Further, on site employment is not ; expected to be high enough to warrant travel demand management , (TDM) mandatory programs . As schematically shown on the various traffic diagrams commencing with Figure 2, the Current A.M. Peak Hour Traffic ; Volumes, the site is presumed to be served by only a single key Christopher Brown a Associates\ -2- 879 Rainier Avenue N., &rite A-201 Renton. WA '98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 u irH T F TH es7' Po FRED 41) 1f / / J � �I Its li L .,,/ �ME)ER --" ' _ i m 1� j y "ter RR_�..•.'. s� _ s: h f, a S < 'i—}�CX �''S lip S TM ST :�'n _2\1y. `5. aI v�f a SW ITH y� N S °\ z I on' �T 1 5 hTN 5T- N 8 I s o 3 i' ' � ♦ 1 'I 18 _ _� `i' t_-<'- ¢ D 6 RIDE ('' -"- , 3TH Si N Sti Dy Wy v) � EN10ENTER ON u�E s_. i (ia sT = F 0 SW' 11 N ,GO VI S R. TON VILLAGE PL / o - 3 a 12SM�r .AI Y C \. ;op.. vt 15W a :5.. 31 5 C� cZ/s �. o • Z / 'vic.st..•t 5�` �+<15TH SW : 16TH 1 —1 sT 400- $W I } \ o .§ ST �,.. 0� I � oc7 � S 16TFI ST ��iGFz5, S o f� - .n Q/ '.V w < S ✓� sN! —j-------- �._.._ __.-.a.. I 9- - - - 17TH ST - _. r --- i� 'a \ �V —N 7 ' .n - Sur G� .P I o tdrR ' z S 18TH,~�,-- �' rumr .n ? 1 SW 19TH ST °At S �9TH 1 ST ._ T o� �O l';3-. . I ------ ---- - C s ^/ TALBOT— \'y �,1�I 3 20s, HILL< 1',. �1� r ��.:) PARK �S �j mil, F IQC r SY'<I 21ST ST 4 `s 3 lJ ') SW 23RD ST \ S 23RD 3 ST s �}�� < r aas a 2I. r I/ I` maws / IIi I J tile Lu ' roar s . S +----' g St_. 2oT$ SW 27TH r 47 ji st 1i'ts ti�v� 5' '< LS 27TH }-- ___-. ST • s '�C•, / �T ,, I s MI- " I , S 27TH P 2HTH �<I"\`1.bjN ^ PL 1� V CI 1J I cv —n ft, 7L "� E uEchl - 1 SW 29TH ST 70 S:• �,,i, s s t _Pi. ,r,,,,-'Sr ,_ 30 -< � e�§� ��T i_ N!.o 15W 3OTH r s SE 31ST ST -fs CT = < ¢I I ST . e- i Ski 33RD ST 1 I s - P I,", -• _ I I _I SW 14TH I 8 ST 1 < 34THSTS = it 1( I o 1 §rs sr al �� S!1 38TH ST I --I t;37rH sr 37T ST S "I IE. 11774TH ST SW 3 ST g !fH ST l/ r ter h §i rs y SW 41ST ST ^A _—3'"'' sT 11/ S 177TH ST fir o S..ea FIGURE 1 Vicinity Mao Christopher Brown & Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. &uite A-201 _3_ / Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 driveway from S .W. Grady Way. This single driveway would thus be in accordance with the Highway Access Management Act of 1991 propounded in SSHB 1671 . Nonetheless, with a single driveway, separate left and right turn exiting lanes will enhance traffic , operations by reducing vehicular delay, especially for vehicles exiting the site. Present Roadway System The major arterial roadway system serving the site is S .W. Grady Way along the site frontage and to the east the signalized intersection of Lind Avenue S .W. S.W. Grady Way is for the majority of its length a five lane arterial roadway complete with curbs, gutters and sidewalks It has a posted speed of 35 mph. There are no adverse grades that would inhibit traffic operations in the site vicinity. The center 2-way, left turn lane along its length at the site provides access as well as a refuge for eastbound left turning vehicles who will enter the site. Along the north side of the site the minor roadway of S.W. 10th Street is presently STOP sign controlled at Lind Avenue S .W. This road primarily serves local access functions . It has no adverse grades near the site. Traffic Data Current (July) 1997 a.m. , noon hour and p.m. peak hour traffic volumes are shown respectively on Figures 2, 3, and 4 . In addition, Figure 2 also shows the current average daily traffic (ADT) volumes . The data was provided by City of Renton staff. Note that the data is a schematic representation to show the various peak hour traffic movements by direction. Other traffic details are contained in the appendix to the study including truck, bus and pedestrian volumes . The peak hour data observations were taken in July under clear and dry conditions . No adverse weather conditions were present Christopher Brown i Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 -4- Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 ' I . 'I • ^4 11\ O \ �f V (1 cp. fe LEGEND tP rr,-, XX Hourly Traffic 0 Volume, direction as shown by arrol i w © Average Daily Traffic Volume P 3 U) 0 Et; .{J 0 H 3 un gl 17 , (---- j s... iik' \ 0 j /� /C0 • �� �-- --T Lind Avenue S.' . ii-‘ kA \'t. ri3t ! '3, FIGURE 2 Current A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ii Christopher Brown C4 Associates _5_ 879 Rainier Avenue N.. suite A-201 Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 I _ j Q v Q For LEGEND see . Figure 2. b a) C7 a) g v] 0 En .1\01)‘ °\t.1 >!\\'\/ �-- Lind Avenue S.W. Gip FIGURE 3 ri�to her C� tlssociates Current Noon. Hour Volumes P 8Ch'Z9 Rainier ABrownvenue eSuite A-ZO1 _6_ / Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 00 f/A/-0 For LEGEND see Figure 2 • N 0 3 . cd 4-) a) a) 3 • cn 0 H Vs ti 5-19 793 Lind Avenue S.W. FIGURE 4 CurrentChristopher Brown 4 Associates P.M. Peak Hour Volumes 879 rainier Avenue N.. suite A-201 Renton; WA 98055-1380_ _ (206) 772-1188 to skew the data. They may be considered typical for the three ; highest peak hours of the day . , It should be noted however that during the afternoon peak hour ! extreme congestion exists at the S .W. Grady Way/Rainier Avenue S.W. intersection to the extent that at times the northbound , right turn movement from Lind Avenue S .W. could not make its , free right turn due to long standing queues on S .W. Grady Way backing up to the west from Rainier Avenue S .W. In essence, this northbound movement was inhibited; a capacity restraint ! exists that is related to operations on Rainier Avenue S.W. This kind of problem is beyond the scope of this study but is noted for reference purposes only. . Adjacent Land Uses ; The section of S .W. Grady Way west of Rainier Avenue S .W. includes two major new car sales establishments, Honda and Saturn, and a pre-owned automobile sales business, the Good-O.K ; General Motors facility. In this respect, the proposed auto- ' center fits nicely into current land uses . Currently, multi- story office buildings are also located on both the east and , west sides of the site and immediately to the south across S .W. Grady Way. i Data References and Sources References and technical resources used in this study include the trip generation data by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) published in the document, Trip Generation; 5th edition and the Highway Capacity Manual, Special report 209, published by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Washington, D.C. For the latter document reference is also made to the computer programs SIGNAL 94 by Strong Concepts of Northbrook, Illinois and HCS published by MACTRANS, University of Florida. These are used under license to Christopher Brown. Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., ,uite A-201 -8- Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 I - ; Horizon Year Traffic I ; The horizon year for this project is taken at the year 2000 . This will be sufficient to cover both construction and leasing ! periods and allow full occupancy of the site. Background traffic growth of 1 . 064 percent per year is based on ; the rate of growth over the last three years at the WSDOT count ! station at MP 27 . 16 on SR 167 south of SR 900 . This data represents arterial traffic growth in this sector of the City of Renton. Data at this location is published in the 1995 the ; Annual Traffic Report by WSDOT. 1 ! Year 2000 traffic volumes without the development are shown on Figures 5, 6, and 7 for the a.m. , noon and p.m. peak hours . As before the A.W.D.T. is shown with the a.m. peak hour data on Figure 5 . Trip Generation In general, there are two ways to estimate the trip generation for the site. One method is to use the published materials by , ITE under the land use code for "Automobile Care Centers" . ; This is LUC 840 and of the four data sets published by ITE ; includes one up to 22, 820 g.s . f. and two sites less than 10, 000 , g.s. f. Auto related work from these includes stereo and seat ; cover sales and installations . The other method is to obtain ; trip generation data from observations of local, similar ' facilities . The latter has the advantage of using existing sites as a model for this site ; Since quick lubrication services on one hand and automobile ; repair services on the other hand are proposed for this site, ; local trip generation data was obtained since it was apparent ; that the ITE published data would not be correct. ; First, considering the speedy "lube" type of specialty service ; facility manual observations over the peak hours were made at four (4) speedy or minute "lube" establishments located in ; Renton, Kent, Midway and Totem Lake. ; On a per "auto service bay" rate the collected data shows the 1p.m. peak hour demands for the arterial street as follows . Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. c,uite A-201 -9- Renton. WA 98055-1380 ! (206) 772-1188 N 0 rs ?': l' f/'r6 1 cQ For LEGEND see Figure 2. al 3 b rd +) a) 0 a) 3 Cl) 0 H Q O .. 2,,,/7 '` -'. vo-L, _,_"2/E.... ,/ --- /-- � - Lind Avenue S .W 11 Og tX r c;\.n ..._________ 1-7 ,.. .11) FIGURE 5 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour Volumes / Christopher Brown c Associates -10- / 879 Rainier Avenue N.. suite A-201 Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 I . . r\il (D N 0 ce ',s 0 For LEGEND see Figure 2. rd i Ts $4 a) C7 a7 3 En vi 4 0 c . /0) Oc, t Le_/7 • z_ii2 g z .��5— --,•- Lind Avenue S.W. CFI ,,,,,, ri 6 --- , 1 ,a ,__..___ ._, , 4 cP\ • FIGURE 6 Year 2000 Noon Hour Volumes Christopher Brown ff Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., c,uite A-201 -11- Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 For LEGEND see Figure 2 •exs r--(3 N � • c1 b b s-1 a, c� as s'a Cl) N � cp 197 1)\' '); j lu`1 877 Lind Avenue S.W, d1 . FIGURE 7 Year 2000 'P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., 6uite A-201 —l?— ( 410 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 TABLE I Trip Generation Quick Lube Facilities Time Period Traffic Volume Kent Renton Midway Totem Lake P.M. inbound 8 6 3 2 veh. /hour P.M. outbound 3 8 6 6 veh. /hour This data is based on observations taken from 3 : 30 to 5 : 30 pm and is for the highest hour within that interval which naturally coincides with the peak hour of the street system. With three service bays the trip rate "per bay" for the speedy "lube" types of facilities becomes : TABLE II Trip Generation Rates for Quick Lube Facilities Time Period Traffic Volume P.M. inbound 1 . 6 veh. /hour/bay P.M. outbound 1 . 5 veh. /hour/bay Next, auto engine and transmission repair, due to its complexity, is obviously a longer process than only engine and chassis lubrication. Some single auto repair jobs can take a full day. For this portion of the facility trip generation data was obtained from a local firm that performs repairs It is important to recognize that that kind of trade data is private and confidential and so privacy has been requested. In the researched facility there are 22 service bays complete with lifts . Employment includes 25 mechanics, 6 service advisors and 2 receptionists . Warranty specialists and car parts (counter staff) have not been included since the following trip rate discussion is focused on trips per service bay and does not include trips associated with the car parts "counter" Likewise, although clearly in the p .m. peak hour some of the related office staff will be leaving the site and thus are a part of the p.m. peak hour trip rate that component is considered to be small . Chri8topher Brown 4 Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., suite A-201 -13- Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 ; For that repair facility the following results shown below were obtained. TABLE III Trip Generation Rates for Auto Servicing/Repairs Time Period Traffic Volume A.W.D.T. 10 . 0 trips/day/bay A.M. inbound 0 . 9 veh. /hour/bay A.M. outbound 0 . 2 veh. /hour/bay P.M. inbound 1 . 1 veh. /hour/bay P .M. outbound 1 . 2 veh. /hour/bay ; Considering the proposed site with the single building of 15 , 000 gsf and 8 service bays the current design contains: 3 bays for lubrication services 5 bays for auto repair With the local trip data described in Tables II and III the ; following trip generation for the proposed Renton Auto Center can be derived. TABLE IV Renton Auto Center Trip Generation (Based on Local Observations) Time Period Traffic Volume Oil Change Auto Repair 3 bays 5 bays A.W.D.T. 100 120 veh. /day P.M. inbound 5 6 veh. /hour P.M. outbound 5 6 veh. /hour Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., suite A-201 -14- 1 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Grouping the above data the following gross site trip generation is obtained. TABLE V Total Trip Generation, Renton Auto Center Time Period Traffic Volumes Based on 8 Service Bays A.W.D.T. 220 Trips/day P .M. inbound 11 veh. /hour P .M. outbound 11 veh. /hour A final comment with respect to the trip generation data would apply to the facility if any portion of it were to be used as an auto-body shop. In that case it is doubtful more than a car a day would be served at any single "bay" and the trip production per day would be well under 10 and the peak hour probably no more than 1 per bay. Assignment The traffic assignment of site generated traffic is based on the Analogy Method described in Transportation and Land Development, Vergil G. Stover, 1988, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers . The representative model used for the trip assignment is the intersection approach data at Grady/Lind. Horizon Year Traffic Figures 8, 9 , and 10 describe the year 2000 traffic volumes for the a.m. , noon and p.m. peak hours with the site fully operational. Christopher Brown ec Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-2O1 -15- Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 i `/,'(L1, For LEGEND see Figure 2 . • s a\‘‘‘N rco .. 43 'd cd • I a) a) P • 4-3 u) ui .4 • o • H co o t'nh� U) • ,z:. q()); \ ( . c'l _,2\ 1 c2j14 ,....0 —�- —T Lind Avenue S.W. ',,, //,,r- 3g 208 U FIGURE 8 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour Volume � Christopher Brown Cif Associates With Project 879 Rainier Avenue N., suite A-201 ,- OL..) Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 i 1 i '7 N Q I # ,e`s For LEGEND see Figure 2. al 3 . b ci 4) . $4 o 0 N .� 3 rn 0 3 N ft,d\ )\ (Ak) Iii ‘!1'. -1,, j cl c\cr\.;\ 13 I1 q2 - Tar—��- Lind Avenue S. 1% r° 0 L ir FIGURE 9 Year 2000 Noon Hour Volumes Christopher Brown Associates iWith Project (11:1111 " 879 Rainier Avenue N., c,uite A-201 1 7_ Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 i s For LEGEND see Figure 2. f/ir) >1 U fa • -P C7 a) 3 C 4 0 ,ofy 220 —�-� —�- Lind Avenue S.W FIGURE 10 Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Christopher Brown Cc Associates With Project 879 Rainier Avenue N., e,uite A-201 18_ Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Capacity Analysis Capacity analysis is in accordance with the recently published ' Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, published by the ; Transportation Research Board. The STOP controlled intersection consisting of the single access driveway on S .W. Grady Way was performed with the computer program HCS, published by MACTRANS, University of Florida, and fused under license to Christopher Brown, P .E. The signalized lintersection of S .W. Grady Way at Lind Avenue S .W. was assessed ; (and optimized) by SIGNAL-94 from Strong Systems, Oakbrook, Illinois also used under license. The abbreviated results of the analysis are noted in Table V below. For brevity the worst LOS and the longest delays at the driveway ' are reported. This is because at STOP controlled intersections the through movement will always be at LOS 'A. TABLE VI Levels of Service & Average Delay Intersection Current 2000 2000 Year No Project W/Project LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Morning Peak Hour Grady Way/Lind Avenue C 16 . 9 C 17 . 5 C 17 .8 Noon Peak Hour Grady Way/Lind Avenue E 59 . 6 F 67 . 0 F 67 . 7 Afternoon Peak Hour Grady Way/Lind Avenue E 56 . 6 F 71 . 6 F 72 . 0 Morning Peak Hour Grady Way @ Driveway NA NA D 20 . 8 Noon Peak Hour Interurban/Grady Way NA NA F 144 . 0 Afternoon Peak Hour Interurban/Grady Way NA NA F 160 . 6 Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A-201 -19- Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) M-1188 When reviewing the above LOS summaries, note that the computer ; input and results are included in the Appendix. The appendix computations show the degree of saturation, average delays, maximum queue lengths and approach LOS values as well as the overall LOS values . For simplicity, only the LOS and average per vehicle delay (in seconds ) are used in the above table. ; Again, as a planning study it is not the intent to derive the signal operations timing requirements of the intersection at Grady/Lind. It is only to indicate what the overall LOS is suggested under the broad categories of this study. Inherent in , these results is a lack of discrimination between theory and practice. For example, long standing queues backing up from Rainier Avenue S.W. have been discussed earlier. On a theoretical basis it nonetheless seems that the Grady/Lind intersection is at LOS ' F ' in the noon and p.m. peak hours . But, this is to be expected since LOS 'F ' is by definition a • ' delay longer than 60 seconds and when a signal has a cycle ' length greater than 60 seconds it is impossible not to have an ' LOS 'F' is any standing queue is not fully discharged. Unfortunately, as a planning study resources can not be devoted : to addressing potential resolutions to this extremely difficult ' problem. What the study analysis does show is that the project will at ; worst induce a possible delay of about half a second at the ; Grady/Lind intersection. Even that may be stretching the boundary. At the driveway, even with a center 2-way left turn lane, there will be substantial delays for the outbound left turn movement. ; Fortunately, the mitigation for this is the driveway linking the site to S .W. 10th Street where capacity is not an issue since its peak hour traffic volumes are minuscule. Site Contribution to Traffic The fair share participation in city arterial traffic mitigation ; may best be described in terms of the contribution to the ' traffic stream. The data of Table V may be useful in this regard and is recommended for this purpose. Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., &lite A-201 -2 0- Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Traffic Control Devices As noted earlier, one driveway will be provided onto S .W. Grady Way. It is recommended that this driveway include two (2 ) outbound lanes for left and right turns, respectively. This will allow free right turns to operate without being restrained ' by the LOS 'F' of the left turns . No traffic control devices other than a STOP sign at the driveway are recommended. Nighttime illumination at the driveway should be considered as a part of the site design in order to inhibit accidents . This , will be especially important during winter months . Conclusions IThe following conclusions may be considered. 1 . The Renton Auto Center will have 8 service bays . 2 . The facility will generate about 220 additional vehicular trips per day. 3 . During the a.m. , noon and p.m. peak hours the Renton Auto Center is expected to generate 11 inbound and 11 outbound vehicle trips, for planning purposes. 4. The noon hour travel demands may be less but for a worst case the above is assumed. 5 . The a.m. and the p.m. peak hours tend to be the same since customer leave their cars for full day service purposes while quick lube services tend to be constant for these intervals . 6. The current level of service in the a.m. peak period at the arterial intersection of S .W. Grady Way at Lind Avenue S .W. is computed at ' C' with 16 . 9 seconds of delay. It will increase to 17 . 5 seconds without the project by the year 2000 and with project completion will remain at LOS ' C' with 17 . 8 seconds of delay. Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. 6uite A-201 -21 - Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 7 . Currently both the noon hour and the p.m. peak hour at S .W. Grady Way at Lind Avenue S .W. is computed at LOS ' F' with 67 . 0 and 71 . 6 seconds of delay respectively. It will increase by 0 . 7 and 0 . 4 seconds with the project by the year 2000 . 8. LOS computations noted above are based on optimized traffic signal timing and do not assume any external constraints from queues forming at adjacent intersections . 9 . The annual rate of growth in background traffic is 1 . 064 percent per year is based on the rate of growth over the last three years at the WSDOT count station at MP 27 . 16 on SR 167 south of SR 900 . 10 . During the heaviest peak hours of the day, at noon and in the p.m. period, there will be no substantial queuing for the eastbound left turn movement into the site from the center 2-way, left turn lane on S .W. Grady Way. The through movements will remain free flowing. 11 . In these same two peak periods the outbound left turn movement from the site onto S .W. Grady Way will be at LOS ' F' . 12 . The low LOS for the left turn exiting movement from the site will lead to the use of the alternative access driveway onto S .W. 10th Street. Such a driveway is a useful mitigation measure . 13 . The principal mitigation measure will be to ensure the site' s driveway will incorporate both a right turn and a left turn lane so that free right turn movements can proceed without being hindered by any queuing from left turning vehicles wanting to gain access onto S .W. Grady _, Way. Christopher Brown Associate 879 Rainier Avenue N., &lite A-201" -2 2- s� Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772408 The Jc C. Radovich Development ....:.npany Proposed Auto Center City of Renton TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Appendix Table of Contents i Page 1 . A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Counts, July 1997 2. Noon Hour Traffic Counts, July 1997 3 . P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Counts, July 1997 LOS Computations Current 1997 Traffic A.M. Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-C1AM 1- 3 Noon Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-C1NN 4- 6 1 P.M. Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-C1PM 7- 9 Year 2000 Traffic Without Project A.M. Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-H1AM 10-12 Noon Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-H1NN 13-15 P.M. Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-H1PM 16-18 Year 2000 Traffic With Project A.M. Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-P1AM 19-21 1 A.M. Peak Grady Way/Main Driveway JCR-P2AM 22-23 Noon Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-P1NN 24-26 Noon Peak Grady Way/Main Driveway JCR-P2NN 27-28 P.M. Peak Grady Way/Lind Avenue JCR-P1PM 29-31 P.M. Peak Grady Way/Main Driveway JCR-P2PM 32-33 !!!!) TRAF , . 0 VOLUME SUMMS- '( PR aJ ECr7-C ,t/ti(W(' DATE (2)y /”1 /DAY ; 1J✓S. INTERSECT ION OF: Gt 2c' k J2/ AND 2/%,,0,1� - TIME 7� TO 7 P = PEAK HOUR S ,s+1=ovnd, Wes 1 L..)ov1);:l- 1.1=r-4h.tovndl sov-w,+xvr�c!115 TIME ►�;� L S R I L S R L S R L S R ate! - 7/c 2 �.6 /- ,, 1 /U,9 .5- : .7 - Y° / / /°f 3 7/-- i7° 2 2 - 2C. ,S //% C ..2' . .�1' -2 . 7O -S' I�° - 7L/S 7/ ;5— .2 - /D S /72 gL. *) 2% _ - _ fq/5'-PV / -�/l .JY/ J 2 / ,3 . _4/2 , 2 ,,-/ _ M n- c. / Z / / • . %``0/7/7.1- , _ C 8 2. / Pc)? /9 , , /‘ .2F _ 9 ,_ ?ed,7 0 ' 2 / / e_f D / Q' C' ' 7 - ,°-`' ,q ✓q ? 7 ll ? s9C . J i y tr. /� /6 7l-/P °plc • •72 ,, - i .5'11 •'? . C`/ J°.9 •YY -6 -- 'Yd. N. 1 I . TOTALS '. % of TOTAL _ , TRAF VOLUME SUMM, Y rRa.,E-cr c,. - .2) (- -,-- DATE - )// "/;/.`''1.? DAY T-; INTERSECTION OF: ,^; 4NW, //12i' AND -"L- / /k. TIME /2 TO / - f P = PEAK HOUR sc.S-i-bO V rnd• kAdle ! L o jrYci r-t h.bound d Sc v+h bcurc TIME 6-2 4 ,4 4�� z-z rv,. -, ' L S R L S R1 L S R L S R c16,1 /2 D7)- /-2/5' ,' F /5'C 1y ,l2 . /Sr / 6� / O 6 �� // -/2. 1".9 2/0 Yo / '/ '2'2 / 22 12S- ? 2/ 99 , 9 izy,- /.qrf ,;2 ?n? , go /21 2 /5 (7' 2s- , >, 2/ 9-F // ,z/3 -/b Z 2� ?/ FY 7/ 0� 2/ e-9 ? 52- ,2 , // df ? . 22 ,_ D D 2 2 D (/,' 22 2�/ /7 5- /2 w / /9Z , M itz 7 i5 Fila 6 9- 2?-3 y/ ' .a)j Y C 1c9 ' ' 2/A fr- „��� 0.8/ o / G 93 D-2'0 0-V D o12 0 L 0.5 -- 00 D.Yr ,o.0 j/G�lif 3- ,' - -- g / 6 //* 3 / . ys g / iz 7 5- 2 9 J7 %ro�.fir 2 Z / D r r '.. r 'W% TOTALS of TOTAL I T RAF _ _ C VOLUME SUMM Y PRQ.1E7Cr �-fir' DATE �ii/ /v /9I7'11 DAY,,i -A9.' . INTERSECTION OF : G'=' ? G //i/c AND '4 c� _ T 1ME �6-7) TO '' P = PEAK HOUR . s+bLnd. 'AJe b�,,,rd Nkz,r4h.boond- soL.)-w,+xvnci I S TIME 67-re.Wcy _ r,,''`-" L S R L S R L SRLS R ake-I t5-b - ,-1/. -g/ Z‘. 92 /i *fi# VI 76 'YY AC? /5 (') 5,2--- 2/S' - Y3b ,�/y /f ...? , - - 2�"7 2/ F,' /r' / / 2Y -a // /o2 9 .rYt7- Y Y2 2qO 25 // 2 /9.5 / 21/z , 2 C ;2-2.Y (] . g_ - '/!X ,%t Z J' Yo ?2 / > 26 /(Y /c) ,/.r/ 2/7' 1/7 �' /()// ‘ /6 "hf/' ?3 ,ZF'.? 2�f 4 l�'? /( �2 /1F 22s' 2S". `� ' c1 /22 5 I// '/- , ?-Y -9�' 2 A 1g 269 /5 FY /22 /F/ 2/ y° . /v2/. y�D - qqj' yY y ,y( • /2 ,/ /2- /4) -2/ i 4/2 76 72 2/ yy - ; 74 2S? /2 Y5 //t /3 , r/ Y-3 /Y2 .13 ° q ' gi l /71.14 2--- 7 ' 17L o 9 3 S 7 0 • .c•- -qY') /1/4 //O /06 /G/ 7q 1 4S7 s/-9-7 i1 Py 2/3 2 '7l/F '1? Fr -ST -32 .53 -2° -YS . �� .Y� ,5 - G2 9f I UCX r ), /` m / z • 29 I/G3' 7 , 4' 6 o • 9�y. F .j 2cy // // /` 5 �fi-G g /3' • // /o , • o r � ► v , v I_ ► . r •► I r r TOTALS ' o; TOTAL Renton Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 : 36 : 12 Current A.M. Peak Hour Volumes SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 17 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I **/**S + + + + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 338 G/C= . 366 G/C= . 162 C= 90" G= 30 . 5" G= 33 . 0" G= 14 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" 0001 I 1 Renton Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 : 36 : 31 Current A.M. Peak Hour Volumes SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation (v/c) . 54 Vehicle Delay 16 . 9 Level of Service C+ Sq 17 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 + + + + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> 1 * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 338 G/C= . 366 G/C= . 1,62 G= 30 . 5" G= 33 . 0" G= 14 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=38 . 3% OFF=79 . 4% C= 90 sec G= 78 . 0 sec = 86 . 7% Y=12 . 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= .0 sec = . 0% Lane : Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Groip Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Apprroach 13 . 1 B TH+RT 22/2 . 122 . 350 1110 1226 229 . 187 13 . 2 B 95 ft LT 12/1 . 077 . 350 279 352 8 . 023 12 . 4 B 25 ft S Approach 13 . 5 B RTI 12/1 . 160 . 760 1129 1140 137 . 120 1 . 8 A 43 ft TH 22/2 . 118 . 350 1143 1259 219 . 174 13 . 1 B 90 ft LT 12/1 . 323 . 350 263 334 235 . 704 20 . 8 *C 199 ft E Approach 17 . 1 C+ TH+12T 22/2 . 272 . 377 1237 1342 818 . 610 15 . 2 C+ 322 ft LTI 12/1 . 348 . 377 580 668 522 . 781 20 . 1 *C 411 ft W Approach 23 . 1 C TH+RT 22/2 . 160 . 173 401 580 352 . 607 23 . 5 *C 186 ft LT 12/1 . 102 . 173 191 302 68 . 222 20 . 7 C 71 ft 0002 Renton Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 : 36 : 40 Current A.M. Peak Hour Volumes SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 41 - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 17 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** + + + + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> 1 * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 338 G/C= . 366 G/C= . 162 G= 30 . 5" G= 33 . 0" G= 14 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=38 . 3% OFF=79 . 4% C= 90 sec G= 78 . 0 sec = 86 . 7% Y=12 . 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol : vph 15 214 8 53 765 522 137 219 235 107 245 68 2588 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 12 8 0 27 35 16 12 32 0 16 10 g/C Used: % 0 35 35 0 38 38 76 35 35 0 17 17 SV @E: vph 0 1226 352 0 1342 668 1140 1259 334 0 580 302 7203 Svc Lvl :LOS B B C+ C A B C C C C+ Deg Sat:v/c . 00 . 19 . 02 . 00 . 61 . 78 . 12 . 17 . 70 . 00 . 61 . 22 . 54 Avg Del :s/v . 0 20 . 7 19 . 3 . 0 23 . 6 30 . 3 3 . 1 20 . 5 33 . 2 . 0 35 . 9 33 . 1 26 . 1 Tot Del :min 0 20 1 0 80 66 2 19 33 0 53 9 283 # Stops :veh 0 40 1 0 165 115 9 38 51 0 81 15 515 Max Que:veh 0 7 0 0 25 16 2 7 8 0 15 3 83 Max Que : ft 0 95 25 0 322 411 43 90 199 0 186 71 411 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol : vph 237 1340 591 420 2588 Svc Lvl :LOS B C+ B C C+ Deg Sat :v/c . 18 . 68 . 37 . 55 . 54 Avg Del : s/v 20 . 7 26 . 2 21 . 5 35 . 4 26 . 1 Tot Del :min 21 146 54 62 283 # Stops :veh 41 280 98 96 515 Max Que:veh 7 41 17 18 83 Max Que: ft 95 411 199 186 411 0003 Renton Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 : 43 : 24 Current Noon Hour Volumes SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 74 ;I Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** * * * * + ++++ / \ <* * +> <++++ v " **** ++++ v North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 086 G/C= . 171 G/C= . 275 G/C= . 353 C=140", G= 12 . 1 " G= 24 . 0" G= 38 . 5" G= 49 . 4" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" • 0004 Renton ; Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 . 44 : 01 Current Noon Hour Volumes SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1 . 4 ] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation (v/c) . 94 Vehicle Delay 59 . 6 Level of Service E Sq 74 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** * * * * + ++++ / \ <* * +> <++++ v **** ++++ v North <* + +> +> ****> 1 * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 086 G/C= . 171 G/C= . 275 G/C= . 353 G= 12 . 1 " G= 24 . 0" G= 38 . 5" G= 49 . 4" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=11 . 5% OFF=31 . 5% OFF=61 . 8% C=140 sec G=124 . 0 sec = 88 . 6% Y=16 . 0 sec = 11 . 4% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane ! Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 90 . 9 F TH+RT 22/2 . 296 . 093 1 295 349 1 . 074 103 . 9 *F 314 ft LT 12/1 . 278 . 093 1 135 96 . 593 43 . 4 E+ 173 ft S Approach 52 . 0 E RTi 12/1 . 372 . 482 615 751 369 . 491 16 . 3 C+ 378 ft THi 22/2 . 322 . 179 1 625 565 . 887 46 . 4 E+ 459 ft LT 12/1 . 344 . 179 1 291 336 1 . 073 100 . 7 *F 546 ft E Approach 52 . 4 E TH+RT 22/2 . 421 . 360 817 1258 1171 . 931 36 . 8 D 745 ft LT! 12/1 . 414 . 282 116 483 526 1 . 073 87 . 2 *F 752 ftl W Approach 64 . 5 F TH+RT 22/2 . 457 . 360 801 1235 1326 1 . 074 71 . 4 *F 847 ft LT� 12/1 . 316 . 282 118 494 249 . 498 27 . 8 D+ 352 ft 0005 i r' Renton, Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 : 44 : 06 Current Noon Hour Volumes SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 74 I1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** i * * + * * + ++++ / � \ 1 <* * +> <++++ v **** ++++ v North <* + +> +> ****> 1 * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 086 G/C= . 171 G/C= . 275 G/C= . 353 G= 12 . 1 " G= 24 . 0" G= 38 . 5" G= 49 . 4" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=11 . 5% OFF=31 . 5% OFF=61 . 8 C=140 sec G=124 . 0 sec = 88 . 6% Y=16 . 0 sec = 11 . 4% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol : vph 40 309 96 75 1096 526 369 565 336 161 1165 249 4987 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 30 28 0 42 41 37 32 34 0 46 32 g/C Used: % 0 9 9 0 36 28 48 18 18 0 36 28 SV @E: 1 vph 0 295 135 0 1258 483 751 625 291 0 1235 494 5567 Svc Lvl :LOS F E+ D F C+ E+ F F D+ E Deg Sat:v/c . 00 1 . 07 . 59 . 00 . 93 1 . 07 . 49 . 89 1 . 07 . 00 1 . 07 . 50 . 94 Avg De1is/v . 0109 . 5 66 . 7 . 0 56 . 9 92 . 3 26 . 2 70 . 1104 . 4 . 0 79 . 8 43 . 7 72 . 4 Tot Del :min 0 159 27 0 278 202 40 165 146 0 441 45 1503 # Stops :veh 0 87 23 0 282 131 63 138 84 0 331 52 1191 Max Que:veh 0 29 7 0 58 36 15 36 26 0 84 14 305 Max Que: ft 0 369 173 0 745 931 378 459 655 0 1081 352 1081 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol : vph 445 1697 1270 1575 4987 Svc Lvl :LOS F E E F E Deg Sat:v/c . 97 . 98 . 82 . 98 . 94 Avg Del :s/v 100 . 3 67 . 9 66 . 4 74 . 1 72 . 4 Tot Del :min 186 480 351 486 1503 # Stops :veh 110 413 285 383 1191 Max Que:veh 36 94 77 98 305 Max Que: ft 369 931 655 1081 1081 0006 i i" Renton Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 : 48 : 13 Current P.M. Peak Hour SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 64 'I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 **/** * + + * + + ++++ / \ *> <+ + <++++ v ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * V G/C= . 043 G/C= . 246 G/C= . 116 G/C= . 117 G/C= . 335 C=140"1 G= 6 . 0 G= 34 . 4" G= 16 . 3" G= 16 . 4" G= 46 . 9" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" 1 1 0007 Renton Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 : 48 : 18 Current P .M. Peak Hour SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation (v/c ) . 94 Vehicle Delay 56 . 6@ Level of Service E @ expect more delay due to extreme v/c ' s (see EVALUATE) Sq 64 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 **/** * + + * + + ++++ / � \ *> <+ + <++++ v ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> 1 + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * v G/C= . 043 G/C= . 246 G/C= . 116 G/C= . 117 G/C= . 335 G= 6 . 0" G= 34 . 4" G= 16 . 3" G= 16 . 4" G= 46 . 9" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF= 7 . 2% OFF=34 . 6% OFF=49 . 1 % OFF=63 . 7% C=140 sec G=120 . 0 sec = 85 . 7% Y=20 . 0 sec = 14 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 73 . 0@ F TH+RT 22/2 . 301 . 124 1 406 392 . 907 55 . 2 E 341 ft LT 12/1 . 279 . 050 1 64 100 1 . 149 142 . 9@ *F 189 ft S Approach 58 . 6 E RT 12/1 . 660 . 544 724 830 943 1 . 136 95 . 9 *F 852 ft TH 22/2 . 357 . 398 1065 1418 811 . 572 21 . 7 C 483 ft LT 12/1 . 417 . 324 275 568 540 . 951 48 . 9 E+ 722 ft E Approach 35 . 8 D TH+RT 22/2 . 382 . 342 688 1181 940 . 796 29 . 6 D+ 615 ft LT 12/1 . 303 . 125 1 190 196 . 907 65 . 1 F 342 ft W Approach 63 . 8@ F TH+RT 22/2 . 461 . 342 681 1170 1343 1 . 148 65 . 0@ *F 883 ft LT 12/1 . 299 . 125 1 194 185 . 841 55 . 2 E 319 ft 0008 Renton Auto Center 08/13/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 10 : 48 : 24 Current P .M. Peak Hour SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 64 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 **/** * + + * + + ++++ / \ *> <+ + <++++ v ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> 1 + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * v G/C= . 043 G/C= . 246 G/C= . 116 G/C= . 117 G/C= . 335 G= 6 . 0" G= 34 . 4" G= 16 . 3" G= 16 . 4" G= 46 . 9" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF= 7 . 2% OFF=34 . 6% OFF=49 . 1 % OFF=63 . 7% C=140 sec G=120 . 0 sec = 85 . 7% Y=20 . 0 sec = 14 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol : vph 30 362 100 84 856 196 943 811 540 121 1222 185 5450 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 30 28 0 38 30 66 36 42 0 46 30 g/C Used: % 0 12 5 0 34 12 54 40 32 0 34 12 SV @E: , vph 0 406 64 0 1181 190 830 1418 568 0 1170 194 6021 Svc Lvl :LOS E F D+ F F C E+ F E E Deg Sat:v/c . 00 . 91 1 . 15 . 00 . 80 . 91 1 . 14 . 57 . 95 . 00 1 . 15 . 84 . 94 Avg Del : s/v . 0 89 . 9148 . 9 . 0 44 . 1123 . 9 88 . 1 33 . 6 62 . 8 . 0102 . 2 87 . 7 75 . 9 Tot Del :min 0 147 62 0 173 101 346 113 141 0 572 68 1723 # Stops :veh 0 97 25 0 212 48 235 158 132 0 335 45 1287 Max Que:veh 0 27 10 0 48 13 58 38 28 0 103 13 338 Max Que: ft 0 341 248 0 615 342 1469 483 722 0 1325 319 1469 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol : vph 492 1136 2294 1528 5450 Svc Lvl :LOS F D E F E Deg Sat :v/c . 96 . 81 . 89 1 . 11 . 94 Avg Del : s/v 101 . 9 57 . 9 62 . 9 100 . 4 75 . 9 Tot Del :min 209 274 600 640 1723 # Stops :veh 122 260 525 380 1287 Max Que :veh 37 61 124 116 338 Max Que : ft 341 615 1469 1325 1469 0009 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 46 : 00 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 17 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 **/** + + + + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 341 G/C= . 365 G/C= . 161 C= 90" G= 30 . 7" G= 32 . 9" G= 14 . 5" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" , 0010 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 46 : 07 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ]. - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation (v/c ) . 57 Vehicle Delay 17 . 5 Level of Service C+ Sq 17 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 **/** + + + + + + ++++ / � \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 341 G/C= . 365 G/C= . 161 G= 30 . 7" G= 32 . 9" G= 14 . 5" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=38 . 5% OFF=79 . 5% C= 90 sec G= 78 . 0 sec = 86 . 7% Y=12 . 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 13 . 1 B TH+RT 22/2 . 124 . 352 1120 1235 235 . 190 13 . 1 B 97 ft LT 12/1 . 077 . 352 218 283 8 . 028 12 . 3 B 25 ft S Approach 14 . 3 B RT 12/1 . 163 . 762 1131 1142 142 . 124 1 . 8 A 44 ft TH 12/1 . 180 . 352 561 656 216 . 329 13 . 9 B 177 ft LT 1 2/1 . 334 . 352 261 331 243 . 734 22 . 0 *C 205 ft E Approach 17 . 8 C+ TH+RT 22/2 . 279 . 376 1233 1338 845 . 632 15 . 5 C+ I 333 ft LT 12/1 . 357 . 376 578 666 539 . 809 21 . 4 *C 425 ft W Approach 23 . 5 C TH+RT 22/2 . 163 . 172 397 576 364 . 632 24 . 0 *C 193 ft LT 12/1 . 103 . 172 189 300 70 . 230 20 . 8 C 73 ft 0011 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 46 : 14 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour Without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 17 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** + + + . + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** - v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + V G/C= . 341 G/C= . 365 G/C= . 161 G= 30 . 7" G= 32 . 9" G= 14 . 5" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=38 . 5% OFF=79 . 5% C= 90 sec G= 78 . 0 sec = 86 . 7% Y=12 . 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol : vph 15 220 8 55 790 539 142 216 243 111 253 70 2662 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 12 8 0 28 36 16 18 33 0 16 10 g/C Used: % 0 35 35 0 38 38 76 35 35 0 17 17 SV @E: vph 0 1235 283 0 1338 666 1142 656 331 0 576 300 6527 Svc Lvl :LOS B B C+ C A B C C C C+ Deg Sat :v/c . 00 . 19 . 03 . 00 . 63 . 81 . 12 . 33 . 73 . 00 . 63 . 23 . 57 Avg Del : s/v . 0 20 . 6 19 . 3 . 0 24 . 0 32 . 1 3 . 0 22 . 4 35 . 0 . 0 36 . 4 33 . 3 27 . 0 Tot Del :min 0 20 1 0 84 72 2 20 35 0 55 10 299 # Stops :veh 0 41 1 0 173 121 9 40 53 0 85 15 538 Max Que:veh 0 8 0 0 26 17 2 7 8 0 15 3 86 Max Que: ft 0 97 25 0 333 425 44 177 205 0 193 73 425 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol : vph 243 1384 601 434 2662 Svc Lvl :LOS B C+ B C C+ Deg Sat :v/c . 19 . 70 . 44 . 57 . 57 Avg Del : s/v 20 . 6 27 . 2 22 . 9 35 . 9 27 . 0 Tot Del :min 21 156 57 65 299 # Stops :veh 42 294 102 100 538 Max Que :veh 8 43 17 18 86 Max Que: ft 97 425 205 193 425 0012 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 51 : 18 Year 2000 Noon Hour Without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 74 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 1 **/** * * * * + ++++ / \ <* * +> <++++ " **** ++++ v North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 086 G/C= . 172 G/C= . 275 G/C= . 353 C=140" 1 G= 12 . 0" G= 24 . 0" G= 38 . 5" G= 49 . 4" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" 0013 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 51 : 23 Year 2000 Noon Hour Without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation (v/c) . 97 Vehicle Delay 67 . 0@ Level of Service F @ expect more delay due to extreme v/c ' s ( see EVALUATE) Sq 74 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** * * + * * + ++++ / � \ <* * +> <++++ v ^ **** ++++ v North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + V G/C= . 086 G/C= . 172 G/C= . 275 G/C= . 353 G= 12 . 0" G= 24 . 0" G= 38 . 5" G= 49 . 4" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=11 . 4% OFF=31 . 4% OFF=61 . 8% C=140 sec G=124 . 0 sec = 88 . 6% Y=16 . 0 sec = 11 . 4% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C ( vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 102 . 6 F TH+RT 22/2 . 297 . 093 1 294 359 1 . 108 118 . 7 *F 323 ft LT 12/1 . 278 . 093 1 134 99 . 615 44 . 2 E+ 179 ft S Approach 57 . 4 E RT 12/1 . 377 . 482 615 751 381 . 507 16 . 5 C+ 390 ft TH 22/2 . 324 . 179 1 625 583 . 915 49 . 4 E+ 474 ft LT 12/1 . 347 . 179 1 291 347 1 . 109 115 . 9 *F 564 ft E Approach 55 . 5@ E TH+RT 22/2 . 429 . 360 817 1258 1210 . 962 40 . 9 E+ 769 ft LT 12/1 . 420 . 282 116 483 543 1 . 108 87 . 9@ *F 776 ft W Approach 77 . 1 F TH+RT 22/2 . 466 . 360 801 1235 1369 1 . 109 86 . 4 *F 874 ft LT 12/1 . 318 . 282 119 494 257 . 514 28 . 0 D+ , 363 ft 0014 [ I I Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 51 : 28 Year 2000 Noon Hour Without Project I SIGNAL94/TEAPACIV1 L1 . 4 ] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 74 II Phase 1 I Phase 2 Phase 3 I Phase 4 **/** * * + / \ ! * * + ++++ <* * +> <++++ I v " **** - ++++ v 1 North ; <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 086 G/C= . 172 G/C= . 275 G/C= . 353 G= 12 . 0" G= 24 . 0" G= 38 . 5" G= 49 . 4" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=11 . 4% OFF=31 . 4% OFF=61 . 8% i C=140 sec G=124 . 0 sec = 88 . 6% Y=16 . 0 sec = 11 . 4% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N . Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVoll: vph 41 318 99 78 1132 543 381 583 347 166 1203 257 5148 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 30 28 0 43 42 38 32 35 0 47 32 g/C Used: % 0 9 9 0 36 28 48 18 18 0 36 28 SV @E: vph 0 294 134 0 1258 483 751 625 291 0 1235 494 5565 Svc Lvl :LOS F E+ E+ F C+ E+ F F D+ F Deg Sat :v/c . 00 1 . 11 . 62 . 00 . 96 1 . 11 . 51 . 92 1 . 11 . 00 1 . 11 . 51 . 97 Avg De1 : s/v . 0116 . 9 67 . 8 . 0 54 . 6100 . 7 26 . 5 78 . 2112 . 1 . 0 89 . 7 44 . 0 77 . 3 Tot Dep. :min 0 175 28 0 275 228 42 190 162 0 512 47 1659 # Stop :veh 0 89 24 0 296 135 65 143 86 0 342 54 1234 Max Que :veh 0 32 7 0 60 41 15 37 28 0 95 14 329 Max Que : ft 0 403 179 0 769 1039 390 474 725 0 1219 363 1219 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVoll: vph 458 1753 1311 1626 5148 Svc Lvl :LOS F E E F F Deg Sat :v/c 1 . 00 1 . 01 . 85 1 . 01 . 97 Avg Del :s/v 106 . 3 68 . 9 72 . 1 82 . 5 77 . 3 Tot Del :min 203 ' 503 394 559 1659 # Stops :veh 113 431 294 396 1234 Max Que :veh 39 101 80 109 329 Max Que : ft 403 1039 725 1219 1219 0015 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 57 : 41 Year 2000 P .M. Peak Hour, Without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 64 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 Phase 5 1 **/** * + + • * + + ++++ / \ *> <+ + <++++ v - ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * v ��, G/C= . 043 G/C= . 219 G/C= . 157 G/C= . 104 G/C= . 334 C=140 G= 6 . 0" G= 30 . 7" G= 22 . 0" G= 14 . 5" G= 46 . 8" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" 0016 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 57 : 46 Year 2000 P .M. Peak Hour, Without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation ( v/c ) 1 . 04 Vehicle Delay 71 . 6@ Level of Service F @ expect more delay due to extreme v/c ' s ( see EVALUATE) Sq 64 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/** * + + * + + ++++ / . \ *> <+ + <++++ v ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> 1 + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * v G/C= . 043 G/C= . 219 G/C= . 157 G/C= . 104 G/C= . 334 G= 6 . 0" G= 30 . 7" G= 22 . 0" G= 14 . 5" G= 46 . 8" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF= 7 . 1 % OFF=31 . 9% OFF=50 . 5% OFF=63 . 7% C=140 sec G=120 . 0 sec = 85 . 7% Y=20 . 0 sec = 14 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C ( vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 59 . 6@ E TH+RT 22/2 . 302 . 165 1 560 405 . 703 38 . 4 D 336 ft LT 12/1 . 279 . 050 1 64 103 1 . 184 143 . 0@ *F 195 ft S Approach 91 . 1 F RT 12/1 . 676 . 544 725 831 974 1 . 172 115 . 8 *F 878 ft TH, 12/1 . 506 . 412 559 760 797 1 . 049 65 . 6 F 927 ft LT 12/1 . 424 . 298 179 517 558 1 . 071 84 . 5 F 776 ft E Approach 44 . 0 E+ TH+RT 22/2 . 387 . 341 684 1179 969 . 822 30 . 7 D+ 634 ft LT 12/1 . 304 . 111 1 165 202 1 . 052 107 . 8 F 358 ft W Approach 67 . 1@ F TH+RT 22/2 . 470 . 341 677 1168 1386 1 . 187 65 . 0@ *F 912 ft LT 12/1 . 300 . 111 1 169 191 . 974 82 . 4 F 334 ft ao14 i Renton ,Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 11 : 57 : 51 Year 2000 P .M. Peak Hour, Without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 41 - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 64 ' Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/** * + + * + + ++++ / \ *> <+ + <++++ v " ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * v G/C= . 043 G/C= . 219 G/C= . 157 G/C= . 104 G/C= . 334 G= 6 . 0" G= 30 . 7" G= 22 . 0" G= 14 . 5" G= 46 . 8" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" ' OFF= . 0% OFF= 7 . 1 % OFF=31 .9% OFF=50 . 5% OFF=63 . 7% C=140 sec G=120 . 0 sec = 85 . 7% Y=20 . 0 sec = 14 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 1 AdjVol vph 33 372 103 86 883 202 974 797 558 124 1262 191 5585 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 30 28 0 39 30 68 51 42 0 47 30 g/C Used: % 0 16 5 0 34 11 54 41 30 0 34 11 SV @E: ; vph 0 560 64 0 1179 165 831 760 517 0 1168 169 5413 Svc Lv1 :LOS D F D+ F F F F F F F Deg Sat :v/c . 00 . 70 1 . 18 . 00 . 82 1 . 05 1 . 17 1 . 05 1 . 07 . 00 1 . 19 . 97 1 . 04 Avg De1is/v . 0 57 . 3154 . 7 . 0 45 . 3112 . 4 98 . 1 73 . 5 90 . 1 . 0112 . 9 98 . 4 86 . 9. Tot Del :min 0 97 66 0 183 95 398 244 210 0 652 78 2023 # Stops :veh 0 96 25 0 222 50 243 199 139 0 346 48 1368 Max Que:veh 0 26 10 0 50 16 65 44 38 0 114 13 376 Max Que: ft 0 336 267 0 634 404 1659 1120 960 0 1469 334 1659 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVo1: vph 508 1171 2329 1577 5585 Svc Lv1 :LOS E E+ F F F Deg Sat :v/c . 80 . 86 1 . 11 1 . 16 1 . 04 Avg Del : s/v 77 . 0 56 . 9 87 . 8 111 . 1 86 . 9 Tot Del :min 163 278 852 730 2023 # Stops :veh 121 272 581 394 1368 Max Que:veh . 36 66 147 127 376 Max Que : ft 336 634 1659 1469 1659 0018 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 : 01 : 26 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 17 I d Phase Phase 2 Phase 3 **/** " + + + + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 342 G/C= . 362 G/C= . 163 C= 90" G= 30 . 8" G= 32 . 6" G= 14 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" 0019 1 RentonjAuto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 : 01 : 30 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation (v/c) . 58 Vehicle Delay 17 . 8 Level of Service C+ Sq 17 jl Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** + + + + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 342 G/C= . 362 G/C= . 163 G= 30 .8" G= 32 . 6" G= 14 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" I OFF= . 0% OFF=38 . 7% OFF=79 . 3% C= 90 sec G= 78 . 0 sec = 86 . 7% Y=12 . 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% 1 Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group I Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 13 . 0 B TH+RT 22/2 . 124 . 353 1124 1238 236 . 191 13 . 0 B 98 ft LT1 12/1 . 077 . 353 219 284 8 . 028 12 . 3 B 25 ft 1 S Approach 14 . 5 B RTi 12/1 . 163 . 760 1127 1139 142 . 125 1 . 9 A 44 ft THI 12/1 . 180 . 353 564 658 216 . 328 13 . 9 B 177 ft LTI 12/1 . 338 . 353 262 332 246 . 741 22 . 3 *C 207 ft E Approach 18 . 2 C+ TH+RT 22/2 . 281 . 373 1221 1327 854 '. 644 15 . 8 C+ 338 ft LT1 12/1 . 357 . 373 571 660 539 . 817 21 . 9 *C 428 ft W Approach 23 . 6 C TH+RT 22/2 . 166 . 174 404 583 376 . 645 24 . 1 *C 199 ft LTI 12/1 . 105 . 174 192 303 72 . 235 20 . 8 C 75 ft 0020 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 : 01 : 35 Year 2000 A.M. Peak Hour With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 17 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 **/** + + + + + + ++++ / \ <+ + +> <++++ v **** v ++++ North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 342 G/C= . 362 G/C= . 163 G= 30 . 8" G= 32 . 6" G= 14 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=38 . 7% OFF=79 . 3% C= 90 sec G= 78 . 0 sec = 86 . 7% Y=12 . 0 sec = 13 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol : vph 16 220 8 55 799 539 142 216 246 116 260 72 2689 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 12 8 0 28 36 16 18 34 0 17 10 g/C Used: % 0 35 35 0 37 37 76 35 35 0 17 17 SV @E: vph 0 1238 284 0 1327 660 1139 658 332 0 583 303 6524 Svc Lvl :LOS B B C+ C A B C C C C+ Deg Sat :v/c . 00 . 19 . 03 . 00 . 64 . 82 . 13 . 33 . 74 . 00 . 64 . 23 . 58 Avg Del : s/v . 0 20 . 5 19 . 2 . 0 24 . 3 32 . 9 3 . 1 22 . 3 35 . 4 . 0 36 . 5 33 . 2 27 . 3 Tot Del :min 0 20 1 0 87 74 2 20 36 0 57 10 307 # Stops :veh 0 41 1 0 176 121 9 40 54 0 87 16 545 Max Que:veh 0 8 0 0 27 17 2 7 8 0 16 3 88 Max Que : ft 0 98 25 0 338 428 44 177 207 0 199 75 428 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol : vph 244 1393 604 448 2689 Svc Lvl :LOS B C+ B C C+ Deg Sat :v/c . 19 . 71 . 45 . 58 . 58 Avg Del : s/v 20 . 5 27 . 6 23 . 1 36 . 0 27 . 3 Tot Del :min 21 161 58 67 307 # Stops :veh 42 297 103 103 545 Max Que :veh 8 44 17 19 88 Max Que : ft 98 428 207 199 428 0021 HCS : Unsignalized In' -sections Release 2 . 1c JCR-P2AM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph : (904 ) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Access Driveway (E-W) SW Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst C. V. Brown Date of Analysis 8/13/97 Other Information A M Peak Hour with Project, Year 2000 Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----NO. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 3 279 791 8 8 3 PHF . 8 . 8 . 8 . 8 . 7 . 7 Grade 0 0 0 MC ' s (%) 0 0 SU/RV' s ( %) 2 0 CV' s (%) 3 0 PCE' s 1 . 04 1 . 00 1 . 10. Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap ( tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 . 40 0029 HCS : Unsignalized In _rsections Release 2 . 1c JCR-P2AM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 500 Potential Capacity : (pcph) 773 Movement Capacity : (pcph) 773 prob. of Queue-Free State: 0 . 99 Sjtep 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 999 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 499 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 499 P -ob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 99 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1347 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 146 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 145 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) ( sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) Sb L 11 145 26 . 9 0 . 1 D 20 . 8 SB R 4 773 4 . 7 0 . 0 A EB L 4 499 7 . 3 0 . 0 B 0 . 1 Intersection Delay = 0 . 2 sec/veh 0023 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 : 06 : 00 Year 2000 Noon Hour With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 74 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 **/** * * * * + ++++ / \ <* * +> <++++ " **** ++++ v North <* + + > +> ****> 1 * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 085 G/C= . 172 G/C= . 274 G/C= . 354 C=140" G= 12 . 0" G= 24 . 1 " G= 38 . 4" G= 49 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" 0024 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 : 06 : 05 Year 2000 Noon Hour With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 41 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation ( v/c ) . 97 Vehicle Delay 67 . 7@ Level of Service F @ expect more delay due to extreme v/c ' s (see EVALUATE) Sq 74 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 **/** * * + * * + ++++ / � \ <* * +> <++++ v **** ++++ v North < * + +> + > ****> 1 * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 085 G/C= . 172 G/C= . 274 G/C= . 354 G= 12 . 0" G= 24 . 1 " G= 38 . 4" G= 49 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=11 . 4% OFF=31 . 5% OFF=61 . 7% C=140 sec G=124 . 0 sec = 88 . 6% Y=16 . 0 sec = 11 . 4% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 103 . 9 F TH+RT 22/2 . 297 . 093 1 293 359 1 . 111 120 . 4 *F 323 ft LT 12/1 . 278 . 093 1 134 99 . 615 44 . 2 E+ 179 ft S Approach 57 . 7 E RT 12/1 . 377 . 482 614 750 381 . 508 16 . 6 C+ 391 ft TH 22/2 . 324 . 179 1 627 583 . 912 49 . 0 E+ 474 ft LT 12/1 . 348 . 179 1 292 349 1 . 111 117 . 1 *F 567 ft E Approach 55 . 6@ E TH+RT 22/2 . 430 . 361 824 1262 1216 . 964 41 . 1 E+ 772 ft LT 12/1 . 420 . 281 112 481 543 1 . 113 88 . 0@ *F 777 ft W Approach 78 . 6 F TH+RT 22/2 . 467 . 361 808 1239 1378 1 . 112 88 . 0 *F 879 ft LT 12/1 . 319 . 281 114 492 258 . 518 28 . 1 D+ 365 ft 0025 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 : 06 : 12 Year 2000 Noon Hour With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 74 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 **/** * * + * * + ++++ / \ <* * +> <++++ V - **** ++++ V North <* + +> +> ****> * + + + **** * + + + v G/C= . 085 G/C= . 172 G/C= . 274 G/C= . 354 G= 12 . 0" G= 24 . 1 " G= 38 . 4" G= 49 . 6" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF=11 . 4% OFF=31 . 5% OFF=61 . 7% C=140 sec G=124 . 0 sec = 88 . 6% Y=16 . 0 sec = 11 . 4% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol : vph 41 < 318 99 78 1138 543 381 583 349 167 1211 258 5166 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 30 28 0 43 42 38 32 35 0 47 32 g/C Used: % 0 9 9 0 36 28 48 18 18 0 36 28 SV @E: vph 0 293 134 0 1262 481 750 627 292 0 1239 492 5570 Svc Lvl :LOS F E+ E+ F C+ E+ F F D+ F Deg Sat :v/c . 00 1 . 11 . 62 . 00 . 96 1 . 11 . 51 . 91 1 . 11 . 00 1 . 11 . 52 . 97 Avg Del : s/v . 0117 . 7 67 . 8 . 0 54 . 7102 . 0 26 . 6 77 . 0112 . 6 . 0 90 . 7 44 . 1 77 . 7 Tot Del :min 0 176 28 0 277 231 42 187 164 0 521 47 1673 # Stops :veh 0 89 24 0 298 135 65 143 87 0 344 54 1239 Max Que:veh 0 32 7 0 60 41 15 37 29 0 96 14 331 Max Que: ft 0 406 179 0 772 1050 391 474 733 0 1236 365 1236 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 458 1759 1313 1636 5166 Svc Lv1 :LOS F E E F F Deg Sat :v/c 1 . 00 1 . 01 . 85 1 . 02 . 97 Avg Del : s/v 106 . 9 69 . 3 71 . 8 83 . 4 77 . 7 Tot Del :min 204 508 393 568 1673 # Stops :veh 113 433 295 398 1239 Max Que:veh 39 101 81 110 331 Max Que : ft 406 1050 733 1236 1236 0026 i HCS : Unsignalized In° sections Release 2 . 1c JCR-P2NN.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S ) Access Driveway (E-W) SW Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst C . V. Brown Date of Analysis 8/13/97 Other Information Noon Peak Hour with Project, Year 2000 . Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection j Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound 1 L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 3 630 1299 8 8 3 PHF . 8 . 8 . 8 . 8 . 7 . 7 Grade 0 0 - 0 MC' s (% ) 0 0 SU/RV' s (%) 2 0 CV' s (%) 3 0 PCE ' s 1 . 04 1 . 00 " 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap ( tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 . 40 0027 HCS : Unsignalized In _-sections Release 2 . 1c JCR-P2NN.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 817 Potential Capacity : (pcph) 534 Movement Capacity : (pcph) 534 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1634 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 227 Movement Capacity : (pcph) 227 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 2420 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 30 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 98 Movement Capacity : (pcph) 29 Intersection Performance Summary Avg . 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 11 29 195 . 4 1 . 4 F 144 . 0 SB R 4 534 6 . 8 0 . 0 B EB L 4 227 16 . 1 0 . 0 C 0 . 1 Intersection Delay = 0 . 8 sec/veh 0028 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 . 12 : 05 Year 2000 P .M. Peak Hour, With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Optimum Phase Timings Sq 64 I Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/** * + + * + + / \ *> <+ + <++++ v ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * v G/C= . 043 G/C= . 219 G/C= . 157 G/C= . 103 G/C= . 335 C=140" G= 6 . 0" G= 30 . 6" G= 22 . 0" G= 14 . 5" G= 46 . 9" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" 0099 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 : 12 : 08 Year 2000 P .M. Peak Hour, With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages : Degree of Saturation (v/c) 1 . 04 Vehicle Delay 72 . 0@ Level of Service F @ expect more delay due to extreme v/c ' s ( see EVALUATE) Sq 64 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 1 Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/** * + + * + + / \ *> <+ + <++++ v ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> 1 + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * V G/C= . 043 G/C= . 219 G/C= . 157 G/C= . 103 G/C= . 335 G= 6 . 0" G= 30 . 6" G= 22 . 0" G= 14 . 5" G= 46 . 9" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0% OFF= 7 . 1 % OFF=31 . 8% OFF=50 . 4% OFF=63 . 6% C=140 sec G=120 . 0 sec = 85 . 7% Y=20 . 0 sec = 14 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% Lane Width/ g/C Service Rate Adj HCM L 90% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue N Approach 59 . 6@ E TH+RT 22/2 . 302 . 164 1 559 405 . 704 38 . 4 D 336 ft LT 12/1 . 279 . 050 1 64 103 1 . 184 143 . 0@ *F 195 ft S Approach 92 . 0 F RT 12/1 . 676 . 543 723 829 974 1 . 175 117 . 5 *F 880 ft TH 12/1 . 506 . 411 557 759 797 1 . 050 66 . 1 F 928 ft LT 12/1 . 424 . 297 177 517 558 1 . 071 84 . 5 F 776 ft E Approach 43 . 9 E+ TH+RT 22/2 . 388 . 342 691 1183 974 . 823 30 . 6 D+ 636 ft LT 12/1 . 304 . 111 1 165 202 1 . 052 107 . 8 F 358 ft W Approach 67 . 2@ F TH+RT 22/2 . 471 . 342 684 1171 1393 1 . 190 64 . 9@ *F 915 ft LT 12/1 . 301 . 111 1 169 192 . 980 83 . 8 F 336 ft 0030 Renton Auto Center 08/14/97 Grady Way @ Lind Avenue SW 12 : 12 : 12 Year 2000 P .M. Peak Hour, With Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1 . 4 ] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 64 :1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 I Phase 5 **/** * -r + * + + / \ *> <+ + <++++ v ++++ ++++ v North <+ <+ + *> + *> *> ****> 1 + + + * + * * **** + + + * + * * v G/C= . 043 G/C= . 219 G/C= . 157 G/C= . 103 G/C= . 335 G= 6 . 0" G= 30 . 6" G= 22 . 0" G= 14 . 5" G= 46 . 9" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" Y+R= 4 . 0" OFF= . 0%: OFF= 7 . 1 % OFF=31 . 8% OFF=50 . 4% OFF=63 . 6% C=140 sec G=120 . 0 sec = 85 . 7% Y=20 . 0 sec = 14 . 3% Ped= . 0 sec = . 0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol : vph 33 372 103 86 888 202 974 797 558 124 1269 192 5598 Wid/Ln: ft/# 0/0 22/2 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 12/1 12/1 12/1 0/0 22/2 12/1 g/C Rqd@C: % 0 30 28 0 39 30 68 51 42 0 47 30 g/C Used: % 0 16 5 0 34 11 54 41 30 0 34 11 SV @E: vph 0 559 64 0 1183 165 829 759 517 0 1171 169 5416 Svc Lvl :LOS D F D+ F F F F F F F Deg Sat:v/c . 00 . 70 1 . 18 . 00 . 82 1 . 05 1 . 17 1 . 05 1 . 07 . 00 1 . 19 . 98 1 . 04 Avg Del : s/v . 0 57 . 4154 . 6 . 0 45 . 3112 . 3 99 . 0 73 . 8 90 . 1 . 0113 . 6 99 . 4 87 . 3 Tot Del:min 0 97 66 0 184 95 402 245 209 0 660 79 2037 # Stops :veh 0 96 25 0 223 50 243 199 139 0 348 48 1371 Max Que:veh 0 26 10 0 50 16 66 44 38 0 115 13 378 Max Que : ft 0 336 267 0 636 404 1672 1126 960 0 1483 336 1672 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol : vph 508 1176 2329 1585 5598 Svc Lvl :LOS E E+ F F F Deg Sat:v/c . 80 . 86 1 . 11 1 . 16 1 . 04 Avg Del : s/v 77 . 1 56 . 8 88 . 2 111 . 9 87 . 3 Tot Del :min 163 279 856 739 2037 # Stops :veh 121 273 581 396 1371 Max Que:veh 36 66 148 128 378 Max Que: ft 336 636 1672 1483 1672 0031 HCS : Unsignalized In sections Release 2 . 1c JCR-P2PM.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph : ( 904 ) 392-0378 Streets : (N-S) Access Driveway (E-W) SW Grady Way Major Street Direction EW Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst C . V. Brown Date of Analysis 8/13/97 Other Information P M Peak Hour with Project, Year 2000 . Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- No. Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Stop/Yield N N Volumes 3 701 1284 8 8 3 PHF . 8 . 8 . 8 . 8 . 7 . 7 Grade 0 0 0 (%) 0 SU/RV' s ( %) 2 0 CV' s (% ) 3 0 PCE ' s 1 . 04 1 . 00 1 . 10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap ( tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5 . 50 2 . 10 Right Turn Minor Road 5 . 50 2 . 60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6 . 50 3 . 30 Left Turn Minor Road 7 . 00 3 . 40 003 HCS : Unsignalized In,,isections Release 2 . 1c - 'JCR-P2PM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1 : RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : ( vph) 808 Potential Capacity : (pcph) 539 Movement Capacity : (pcph) 539 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 99 Step 2 : LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 1615 Potential Capacity : (pcph) 233 Movement Capacity : (pcph) 233 Prob. of Queue-Free State : 0 . 98 Step 4 : LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows : (vph) 2490 Potential Capacity : (pcph) 27 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0 . 98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0 . 98 Movement Capacity : (pcph) 27 Intersection Performance Summary Avg . 9 5 0 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) ( sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) SB L 11 27 218 . 2 1 . 5 F 160 . 6 SB R 4 539 6 . 7 0 . 0 B EB L 4 233 15 . 7 0 . 0 C 0 . 1 Intersection Delay = 0 . 9 sec/veh A 1 r **************************************************************** City of Renton WA Receipt **************************************************************** Receipt Number: R9705444 Amount: 1, 504 . 16 08/26/97 16 : 19 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: #030323 JCR Init: LMN ;Project # : LUA97-127 Type: LUA Land Use Actions Parcel No: 102305-9011 Total Fees : 1, 504 . 16 This !Payment 1, 504 . 16 Total ALL Pmts : 1, 504 . 16 Balance: . 00 **************************************************************** Account Code Description Amount 000 . 345 . 81 . 00 . 0007 Environmental Review 500 . 00 000 .345 . 81. 00 . 0017 Site Plan Approval 1, 000 . 00 000 . 05 .519 .90 .42 . 1 Postage 4 . 16 RECEIVED AUG 2 6.1997 DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CITY OF RL'NTON • RECEIVED AUG 2 6. 1997 >'D MEN'f O T'. OF R ..................... N <:::::>::::>:<::»::::>::::>::>:::::::»>::>::::>::>::>::............> . :. : .L,.. I:.. RAI AGERE P T.....................:::.....................::..... III" > >< '•.> > ':<>>>>` ?:':?:?3"> »> > ><':<`:•`' ''> .............................. ``` :::::::::...:..::.EAIR; T E...1 W.C.ORNER.OE.THE•INTERSE TIO .;:.;:.;:.;::.::.::.::::.: ..........................................:.... • , OUR JOB NO. 6052 p3 AUGUST 25, 1997 9''P- • Ii rt �0 9 0) cv�' S/26'/q 7 set Oiterre sioNAL Eta I EXPIRES CS-%l-. Y8 I Prepared By: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WASHINGTON 98032 ��,Hays (425) 251 -6222 zC z CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES sG ,py. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 2.0 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 3.0 ON-SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 4.0 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM SCREENING .. 5.0 RESOURCE REVIEW A. BASIN RECONNAISSANCE SUMMARY REPORT B. CRITICAL AREA DRAINAGE AREA MAPS C. FLOODPLAIN FLOOD WAY FEMA MAPS D. OTHER OFF-SITE ANALYSIS REPORTS E. SENSITIVE AREA FOLIOS F. SWM DIVISION, DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION SECTION PROBLEM MAPS 6.0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOILS SURVEY 7.0 WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS ' 8.0 CONCLUSION 9.0 APPENDIX APPENDIX Exhibit A Vicinity Map Exhibit B Drainage Area Maps Exhibit C Off-Site Analysis Drainage System Table Exhibit D Assessor's Map Exhibit E Basin Study Exhibit F Sensitive Areas Folio Exhibit G Wetland Inventory Map (Not Applicable) Exhibit H Drainage Complaints (Not Applicable) Exhibit I King County Soil Survey 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION The site analysis for this Level 1 Drainage Study was conducted on August 25, 1997. The weather was cloudy and rainy. The proposed project will be to construct a retail office building. The total site area is approximately 1.2 acres in size. The project is located in the northwest corner of Section 19, Township 23 North, Range 5 East,Renton,King County, Washington. Based on a more localized description, the project is located near the northwest corner of the intersection of Grady Way South and Lind Avenue S.W. The site's existing groundcover consists of mostly dense brush and blackberry briers with scattered small trees. There is an existing power vault and billboard located on the property. Generally, the topography of the site is fairly flat, however, it has a slight slope from 1 to 3 percent to the west. 2.0 UPSTREAM DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Our project has developments that are adjacent on each property boundary. Each of these developments collect their own drainage, therefore, our site does not incorporate any upstream drainage that sheetflows onto the property. However, there is a 42-inch CMP culvert system that outlets on both the north and south sides of the project. For a picture of this pipe network, please see the City of Renton's Surface Water Storm Drainage Exhibit located within Exhibit "B" of this report. Through our conversation with Scott Woodbury, of the City of Renton, we came up with a fairly clear idea of how much upstream drainage this 42-inch CMP tightline system collects. Please see the Basin Limit Map within Exhibit "B" that helps define portions of the upstream area that are collected within the 42-inch system. From a brief analysis of the upstream area, we found that drainage from approximately 40 acres of land is collected and conveyed through this 42-inch system. 3.0 ON-SITE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The current conditions for all on-site flow consist of sheetflow that enters into an open ditch section that conveys all drainage from the upstream area through the site and exits into a single 42-inch CMP culvert that heads toward the west. The ditch section that runs through the site has approximately a 5-foot bottom width, 2:1 side slopes, is very highly vegetated, and is approximately 3 to 4 feet deep. From our on-site investigation, it does not appear that extremely high level flows are coming through the site due to the fact that the channel is very heavily vegetated and no apparent erosion exists. 4.0 DOWNSTREAM DRAINAGE SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND PROBLEM SCREENING For a more detailed description of the downstream system, please consult Exhibit "B," Drainage Basin Maps, and Exhibit "C," Off-site Analysis Drainage System Table. The downstream drainage from our project begins at the project's southwest corner. It is there that all upstream and on-site drainage enters into a 42-inch CMP culvert. This 42-inch CMP culvert continues in a westerly direction and heads under a couple of developed sites where their drainage 6052.002[BH/sm] appears to enter into the 42-inch CMP culvert undetained. The 42-inch tightline system continues toward the west until it hits an open ditch section, then that open ditch section enters into two 42-inch CMP culverts that cross under Powell Avenue S.W. From there, the open ditch continues westerly until the drainage reaches the Black River. This channel is also labeled on the City of Renton Surface Water Drainage System maps as the P-1 channel. The last 300 to 400 feet of open channel appear to be just recently regraded, and it appears that construction for some type of project is under way. We did not find any apparent erosion or significant downstream problems that were created from flows within this downstream area. 5.0 RESOURCE REVIEW The following is a description of each of the resources reviewed in preparation of this Level 1 Drainage Study: A. BASIN RECONNAISSANCE SUMMARY REPORT The site is included within the Green River Basin and the Black River Sub-basin. A Basin Reconnaissance Summary Report can be found in Exhibit "E." B. CRITICAL AREA DRAINAGE AREA MAPS This site is not located within a critical drainage area. C. FLOODPLAIN FLOOD WAY FEMA MAPS This project is not located within a floodplain as determined by the FEMA Map. The FEMA Map for this project can be found in the front portion of Exhibit "E" of this report. D. OTHER OFF-SITE ANALYSIS REPORTS The review of area maps and a site investigation was conducted for analysis in preparation for this Level 1 Drainage Study. E. SENSITIVE AREA FOLIOS Each of the sensitive area folios associated with this area was reviewed. After review, it was found that the subject property incorporates no sensitive areas. • F. SWM DIVISION, DRAINAGE INVESTIGATION SECTION PROBLEM MAPS The typical drainage complaint reports that are usually described in this section in a standard King County Level 1 Drainage Report were unavailable due to the fact that this site is located within the city of Renton. However, we did research the downstream area with Scott Woodbury, of the City of Renton, and in our conversation he explained that the downstream area of our project appears to incorporate no significant downstream problems. 6052.002[BH/sm] 6.0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOILS SURVEY The U.S. Department of Agriculture Soils Survey for King County has been incorporated in this report and can be found in Exhibit "I." 7.0 WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS The wetland inventory maps that were available for this area were reviewed. It was found that there are no wetlands in close proximity or downstream of our project. 8.0 CONCLUSION The downstream area for this project appears to have no major downstream problems. All drainage segments of the downstream area appear to have adequate capacity to convey all upstream flow. No significant erosion problems were found in the downstream area so, in conclusion, we feel that there will be no adverse impact to the downstream system if the development to our property incorporates City of Renton standards. 6052.002[BH/sm] EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP 6052.002 [BH/sm] VICINITY MAP ., .r.r J. IUTx I N 74"a'''''V . N 6TN ST_ • , Y S1 _ `,: T II wr. I __ ' , KY , ,•� .0 j S7 s . < W'..ar. I 1 1267NT • 11 ' iiii!li / '�. E I 1 s i.Tx PL i, (] ij� . 1(f 4"41'`Ant �I�� �• 128TH D! ST !ierx i43 - �� 11 ST `k ' �sd' A ,Pe. e MIT _ '. ▪ Fl• ° 5 ° -8� � L. H�``I! �c • ■•Ta,o wok .� RFNRW / �.KeP' ll&, ,..ElErr / • S 132ND __ 2ND g Mg �'n �y groRrui ©® - El `; '-134 2: I TDr04: ST18' RENIDN xur \` `"e'.-` •%� \` tif 1 PYr 4• 7"--Pkg'miwri .1',0-sftl, c _n wear -e TrL 3 su'`;:?°;;�r=;�k:�•• , BN W 1 fx R f DYER 1 \� ": ��,'���© �ri d� ','.?a:=il,.�N!'��'-.�s;¢ �F 0�' RENiDN I •Ls:•'�_�8: "3t' t•� L/�`fry( �' � P .•,�. y~:•, A M l ritrr1.., i� r H S 7THYCT'•_....,rp`: :TSB.'. I g �SW .. •ExrGx VILLAGE I 2'5 w ARN17L0,�.si,.. 0(N 9. J I 77 V I CENTER �r . . 'J .,c,,' ft e H ST (j(iAD S R: ON VILLAGE PL e �•1�� FtlL7lNY :rF e.��'vow; INx F�W� i r•Nilintlile —{ ♦ I 1--- 2 �,I�r�`1/�itUTi 1 20 c a ST'. 16, I 400 .TH S7�1'I re Q lg," S 16TH ST y t,,. , iO�tSI! 4= 5 --I,A SE-16TH / L- ---I r r� — -- 1-9 :-17TH 5„ 0 _ gyp.. I Ni nre ` S 18TH urx• 'g ST iMI R' I rn . „� g �s,, . I • �Su 19TH ST ill .��. N u+ � �� 11 S 19TH ST, r LBDr a" v A W aa. •. --"* i'1 4' ?PL'P '< • .ft FELL 9•b S ( �1� 1 '`r v 5 PITY r 0o PUGET`Csv '"•.7 • ,�`t 1%'4 g. 1 fib •4 2tST d V a� •- 'P` GIST•.,"-pal �.. � SW 23RD ST ' 1'•_S 23RD.I E ST S.•I, s 1 AI. -- 1 near ,[II ID I„AI.1 <I>, l \ 9^ G 'rumut -1t ; `° I 62ND k - L P.n Su `27TH ST'-• ,I 1 o a4�,5 j S 27TH ST SE 10900 1.4TH 7L II i S 6Tx P jH,ip'Pry. S 1.5"CT, 1 s 28TH SS1�6: W .e.- SE I I',TII - PLK'- 'tN \ .E 166TH (F 29ni ST 1 29TH ST II,72` ~ t: • PL T` "ST 1 SE 162Tx ST 5Y 30TH \`' sE'J15T ST L a\ < '< i'�� w ¢'N - E n y 3,j�5T I 1! 'gam P 1 - _ `^a 5E 169TH{L •y SE I W � I 4' < 1 x SE- I70TN ST 170T. '<i SW I TH 8 ST ��! ` 31TH ST S ,. DI ,\, SE 1 172ND, ST : SE 72ND: �(o 1 rS , < s er I 2 •tr I fPL d Q f y /� S'�S�sr vvn sl „° Y,SBTH ST I -I 37 ST S E I74TN ST\ Ur Tail. 3 SW 3} 41ST IH ST S' s `' ( I r 4. SE SE 1767E 5$T7 Sli ST 1 D s" F r. Z 1[ s I n s �. n.rn 6 g o E.lihn 1 '�n\*M EXHIBIT B DRAINAGE AREA MAPS 6052.002[BH/sm] • RIVER �I'. w II I V _� 0 J,/, III 21 11.21 1 I I I �\ I%/ , 1 I I X 23 I II :\'1)' ". . ...'''.:::". I 1 . III . IIIII ' ys�'" tli I li II IIIM��T II _ / II ail k'lAvt.c>va 1 11 in g . , L J . 1 ,, __ _ ( . kyk5E ii ii r___ __ . �11 t I I - I I(T) ,.,. — 11 I I �7--� x13 II 11 11 II II 70 / X17 II 7.� 11 �� k� II , e EARLINGTO , GOLF COUR- 40,._ Arir r• w... .- ............. _ _. .._ —25 ,. ..._\14. \t 0"cY% ".." ...............000000000./7,.. - vg II. ..-_-• ........,-.-014 .........'hex .. -- '-. 4). 1? 13?1 • 4. \ v--✓'::•-�'SEAS__- r �►.I , I I inigo:ii-- -- -� — ��- ��� xL ® =�3' ,II im poi _VI --�� 2.� x i2g I1 . h� c %r 0 v. r �� N �rP� 115Ka C _- II ` - -_ r dill 00 2 DO XI _ --- _ `_- 0TNT- I I 0 q C 0 J x a I l o� x11 � o 1 �d 1 1 li�`� =g.� 1111 w r , I�+I 1 I I 1`,.. _.i 0- 15 X I > I III �� I `24 sal x x I I �. ���.��'1 i�21;: I1 � h^� Q r �I` __ )I � I �� xi__ I �� ' x �/X / • U xcka [(� + BR I I 150TH� II IZ10 I x D �--� I . . ' I � �1 II x ----1 ,..• \ . /-- III ! I r1 _- -- x III i I �y!(s (old '��q Jx\��X/ X 15 1 I I x V/ • • is _I_- - �--��i i 1� �_-r� / -- �/ is 1 _- _ - . i i • ' I X 16 1. i e-00 _____,..= ---1...;2 'N. , . . W k°° !V g 16 R II , ,,, --x-r \ '•,‘ r . 11, �0. <• I I, i! ; Ix I Q,7 z 'igII --00 X15 0 qt. II II x . 1 „..==.7== gp3r tp is . �; IIsir n _x_ I 9 II � —153 RD _-- = _ IIlin I I S _J _ XL IR@NTON MtflWAY- 115 KV. • • • x \ x _ x •'+� X 16 CULT. FIELD • _ xl3 CULT, FIELD . 4: a' x +� X 16 k x XIS x —X — ' ammo • ..� V , X I6 �x k ` ', X--�-A x�x�x • 1 x�' l I / x Iz. J t1 � X 13 I il N /'.4 X 12 12 / XIIsx CULT. FIELD I /j • X12 \ XII . -� � C U I T !.41E"as*. - ""-;:lk e .. P774:4*.• .4'/Aild) //I* * 4.0 : ... . ,. . • ..•. .1 •i• . , . blimp ilk .. . •pia" , f --1 \ . . ` �l l•., 1, f?,/agiiiff / , ' a.°,- -%*\ - 1 . , ., , --, ....„.0. _. -,i, . • : • ,. i.... 4 , ,.,. ........ .. ...,,,, .4( .„,..,:.:;.. 4...440\ ,00 if-- ,,,,,--1,..„ , ,, , , ..% .::.. .:.... , 1 -. • , .,,,,,k.„ , ...... .,. . ., . .S,.. 1.ir-v" ..,... , I I . I I( ,',;,.-:fr.,n!.;;•,...ii .,..,4 ;.,„ . J ....S6 tk., L. , • I..r. j p , .-- • ."-L-•'—'-z--.-.:.-__----- -,---....-..." ''" ii. 4 - 14 • ''''hr V `:',` :, SITE _ ' 4 •1 1 ,. 1 ... :.. 1 1 I 4 , . • ..., , 1 ,,\ , , ::1;-: ... r•• 10i. — ' 111 •---- iii -_-_--- 1 • , de.. . —.... . Ott I ( • ,. -ft..:.V;.;, . ...1,:„..____, ---i-airiellr:91911 • 1 P" I • % r,.........--- oe„,,,,,...• if.Ill ei. ' • • .!ilw zr-,....... ...--‘irriajp,I . iiii la, f— % a as :Ik 11 ppl argargUlkOltiL4 al \ • pi I' el si mg Ir . , _ ,, , .___ .............b.— .. I'.- it& • ik\ I •4. gingla : fWily •~ .■ �O •1 1 (1 li , '-11.-4•4 . ,Il , ,....,: • .... . , ,_ fr: 1 . . . . • L __‘,,,, • .4 e °ill s / ii V. b . . .: . . • O Reservoir. . ii\ lk\ iv- • . i ti•1 1) r com D • 1 • 5318 SW 1/4 • orh 16.DB-3 • tq6 E9-z • a_z Ph E• • 19 • • 1 B CI OF REN O N16.DB1; SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM 76.E7 I�EB_B 6.E3-9 ;: : s : :':: z 16.D8 a 16.EB_ I6.E8-0a6•BB-5 16.CB-7 _ + B- •:.x6.E;,2 : d•he)7iilyEQ � : LEGEND �0 � kw - ` \ 21 B� b.�:. 16.D83 Ib.EB-�✓ 6Zg.e 16-f8- ?LF2-2 • v7 3 3 • y To.�` 2Ir2-7 >: • �Q ::2tE2-a n; ¢ }21cz-1 ¢ ¢ 24E2- 44E2-2 • U �s U? �, �LE2- STORM SEWER LINES 0 Vi CI). LC3-6 2u3-. _�.', a- .• Nilik d �211�-5 J 2L ..:. 11T DITCH LINES E tni • • a 0 zD.H3 a ..� N F % 21C7-7 �-2LC3-3 an A a 4. q 2I.E3-4 2LE7-II [_,; 2LC3-2..: �� CATCH BASINS 2 : • 21.C3_11 1 zL�r - 2tE3_lo;•, : i SE 6 MAHHOLEs • Q a.c3-ID 2LC3-9 • MOW 1°11 • ZS• 2LE7-1 . �` DIRECTION ARROWS .. • Z 0 _ 2---;2. _-.\.: . l. 3-y....• ...-- 21F3-2 •` >—� CULVERT \rROSSN`IV 21F i 20,H3_� - •. ........ ....... 2LE - '=. LE7-7 fait Golt'ty�J V ATI V� VS il 01/1 3�� • • • 2LCa-9: '2L3-I T O !�+ • 21Ca-f0...,..,�>\••: - 2403-I 'KEY- RE7\10N CITYS 7 :.:'KE3-6�.. t^ 04 _ -�•zLE3-5 W . NOW : •2LB, B_,.. -• l 21Ca 3 E"'6 21.B,-9 ..,.:.. 2LU-a 210,-) - St 2LU_8\ nth .: t un�: w. 2 _ C�i -stay" 24E4-6 LC. 2LE,_P. t 21 0, t Y • 9 ::..,..,.:. ; $w t� A LLD, M :.. 20,H, G 2LOa- • 21 2LU 5 F I� .,.:::., • __...--::: .:• 2LB,-6 h _ '- w _5 - Oa r •� •J ..::,"24C1_2 2L 4_I , .22 ?I-2LU-20 • !12:. ... 3 D, wµ21.E,-5 .�2LEi-`2"^,....: • nu...,1 •`. "V{tU t3 • 2LE,-6 JY 21Ea-3 Wyy -' t� h:S" / — 2t a-3 21,Ca-16 ztcy_Is : 'CC • O $�:: •zB,-2 r .$W" 2th :s::xN - 2ua_2:. DISCLAIMER � :. -•r^ T INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. AND SLD - C THIS BE USED FOR INVENTORY INFORMATION FOR THE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS SCHEMATIC �EMATIC ONLY. IT VAS COMPILED FROM NUMEROUS SOURC Cg _:_ '2%Bs-, • ---•:_; - - -- IT IS THE SGEN R S AL GUIDANCE ONLY. THE CITY OF RENTON F10I1 "'" ""- IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS OR OMISSION WHEN THIS ~ I INFORMATION IS USED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES. DESIGNERS -'-- zLBs-3 2105-7 { ARE TO EKED VERIFY THIS INFORMATION. lr 2LB5-1 ' 21,135-2 2LD5-19 LLL " "" 21.05 I 2LD5 1 DS-18 5_a ...::.�: ... 21.E _2 ..::-... W _ _ fit., • 2LF 5 a . a c 2LD5-2 H J .'2E05-7 _ 2105_ . tD5-4 • 2LD5-5i 0 • .-2186-7 21.C5-IS 1Ot71 21.C5'k 21 \ =2LD5-6 2LD5-7 - --t—_—+ — _• « _ - _ 400 b.th, .St... rt _.-_S1✓-._z«5-1�._ :. ES . \ 21.06-13 t 2LD6 1t . . 0 • 80 206_5 21,C5-19 2I,C5-la O ® ., �.... -r:i :}::};:::}::: }}}::$::}::i} 2105-1B. 2LC3-16 - � •: .21.86-9 / r1,B6?ID 21,D6-II 2LD6-12 �: • 1 :4 8 0 0 2LC6-b Y • 2LC6-7: 2406-7 2LD6-6 ... 1 O •2136-4 21E6-7 - 2L06-2 24E6-I �' 3 j y 2LE6-e + + P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 2LC6-2 2106-5die �` 2LD6-I �< _ 09/23/96 24C6-1 2L06-ID 21E6-2 1: •� 5319 SW 1/4 5319 NW 1/4 4313 SE 1/4 • • s • w a • • 1��_.r cP • { e2 CITY OF RENTON • • IS,GB-1 • • SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM TEM .:0. 22..... } • . aI5B-20 • LEGEND1 z4�_6� -""-•• w.+�.^...:..-..._ 0,G -I - s ! th-Mst.._, .. ?o 4B 5 16.Ea-.akesdal e:2-1 _ � .v:,:..--Ave SW ........, Z4G2_5 • ................. _ N LIES �.. 20,G2-2 3 STORM SEWER tizoGz-lo �4 a., - • ¢ 2Lc2 1 — DITCH LINES 24G2-9 °' •20.H3-1 • E. o 24G3-. o 2LC3-G 0 CATCH BASINS .` G2_B U 'z4 u, : Cr) 21,C3 Qi 1. O $... MANHOLES o p:241,3 a 20.G3-3 .s • ` It 24G2-7 21,C7-2.i 2LC3- el 24/3 2 `-: .4 DIRECTION ARROWS i E ZLc3-n j / i , 20.G3-2 Q 0LC3-10 2 b. 24G7-7 —a 1 CULVERT \.RO.73N`(V i 24G3-B 75 ✓ z4c3-I zB.ci-i��j_9 I L} 3 O RENTON CRY LIMITS 1 ► :20.13-3 .. (ea (5d• �a : 'i z4G,-11 : 247r3-[� :: 1 20.G,-1• :1 24L3-6 20.G.-14 20.W-8 ,S -1 t�e�t 1 (iv: 24G._i3• ZB.G.-7: 24,,,-1 St - i ire° �: ::20.G3-5 t o `. th LBa 9 Hie r 1 a: W 1� i ,•20,G.-. 20,G.-12 1 20.L.-6 N w •• L �-24G.-2 + •� :.:. - ,::.2LB.-6 ' :-.-1 1 20Ji �,Jy LB.-z DISCLAIMER 4H. 9 ..:.. 1 _ "�� S INVENTORY _ d S MAT INFORMATdON FIR C@tPILED FROl1 NUMEROUS SSWRCES, -- - ........ G. IT IIS THE BESTI NFORNATION AVAILABLE AT THIS TIRE, AND SHOULD : -15.` Zi �— :':^^� BE USED FOR GENERAL GUIDANCE ONLY. THE CITY OF RENTON .--� VI.�Zth.St' ,.- IS NOT R 1 FOR ERRORS OR OMISSIONS- VHEN THIS ESPONS HLE lY �--='U"-21.B5-5: I EORO TION IS USED FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES, DESIGNERS Vf r A FIELD VERIFY THIS INFORMATION. • z4cs-z ::..::' d7 LB : I 7 4fl521.05-1 2L3 5-2 LLL • CJ • 0 8 0 • • _ I : 21.E5_ 0 40 0 LBG- 2LH6 7 - ---- 2LC5- .::.�t w - - 1 :4800 W...16th.:.St ......... :::..: .:........ :- CS 2LH6 5 � y 21B6-921 -IB 2LC5 16" -^ �� • LBG210 ♦ + P/B/PW TECHNICAL SERVICES 0 2LH6-. 4i� �� 09/23/96 4324 SE 1/4 3 N� 4324 NE 1/4 08/25/97 14:25 FAX 206 235 2541 RENTON P/13 j 41001/001 7') ' \ . S •••••"? 0 4i ' < il • .-........ '(4t..\•. \' • t 0 I> 0..--1 ,). k41,. • ... o 0 S11I gr, 2 uM4IMiI CcMcI Z 0 < 0 < 0 44 c°o WiMil LU Clli e . • \ 0 CC Cr C C C 0 Z 0 itr\ i 1 [ ?. h \•(1 CO i M U. < I) am. 0 1 ..... ., • 11.' i. 1 it y 1 R .3\ (,,i, 0 \ 0 2 . , \ --„-,7 .i.,......... •• •...... ,._ 111..f 0 A Z CC ••-•-...1 1 4/ El 5. • \ (/).., •1,., s-, " e \ c.c. ,._ < 1 . .....T = , „. . t t--... . 4-• —I _ . .._. \ , ,. . ._. z- .. CO 4 • -, CD •••re ..... ,. t A ""•`...z r ,,- "' % • • .s., • ..g.-). • es A ' `" '.."( \ . • ,_... • • ilik , -. • , ,.l. • _........,....,;......- 0 . -.•. , ., s.• \ 7:. . It t --.'-••-. 0 ... , . -..,...... r- .. . c , i P"' • . . ., ..f.• ' ' ..• ,... •. t 's. 4 - -T.r: - ••• , _ • f- .. .3.--.C.• '' CV Z4.....i. ;83 s• ..k. \ • * 6 Al! I --li --- \ -, • Al daa • to .41.4 ii. •Z olli- • . %,.._ , • r -...)3 \ . • I- ,: [ :•, .. . ---- •-' a. 0.. u_, Ilk ., ... . ._. ., ., Comitili4 46 : ‘ , , - .9111111141111111111k . . .‘ • J I ; 4tr o.' .•••"' /,,,. ••••. . :'... . .. .. 1 . % „.••,---'4\ • ,,...... ,..-..,...-...'• _. u \ N. • . • . ,---,,.••• • % \ . _. i.. \., . ,. 00100044 ... : .1. . el 1 1 1 s , • r.,=-Fitair 1 1 9 ---- . ;. , ....,; • . ... - . . EXHIBIT C OFF-SITE ANALYSIS DRAINAGE SYSTEM TABLE 6052.002[BH/sm] OFF-SITE ANALYSIS-DRAINAGE-SYSTEM -TABLE - - - Basin: Green River Subbasin Name: Black River Subbasin Number: Effig$POOKO.gaNgiAgOEN i.RENNEVO.011010X1agiNSii;ME i74#011#0giResident See Map Type:sheet flow,swale,stream, Drainage basin,vegetation,cover, Ft Constrictions,under capacity,ponding, Tributary area,likelihood of problem, channel,pipe, depth,type of sensitive area,volume overtopping,flooding,habitat or organism overflow pathways,potential impacts pond;size,diameter,surface area destruction,scouring,bank sloughing, sedimentation,incision,other erosion 1 42" CMP Tightline to west under parking 1% 0'-600' None None No apparent erosion • Has a couple access risers 2 Open channel 2:1 SS, 3' bottom width, 1% 600'-1100' None None No apparent erosion 3' deep, highly vegetated 3 2-42" CMP culverts Under Powell Avenue S.W. 1% 1100'-1200' None None No apparent problems 4 Open channel 2:1 SS, 3' bottom width, 1% 1200'-1900' None None Construction work, recently 4' deep, earth lined • regraded • • • 6052.003 [1311/sm] EXHIBIT D ASSESSOR'S MAP 6052.002[BH/sm] zs� _ .y.g9- /O- 2.5w y6� n \ AccEss b � � lit 4pC V- � ESMT. LAO Assessor's Ma 1 " = 100 ' ,_ ys�.,a_ZSE 297 �� �SB3z 2629 • E V 41` /14, S lir f 1 04 . ci i • o i N 01 a ` Iib I 54 � I V 69,o4Ac IS h . • M 1 58G2 � � � � 3r,7 P 1Oo"8° D RE s 1 • I -�1L,1�4 3'�9.�� P 8 . 6:.: • 4• 4 05° a ; , z� 4 t g, ��-— L oT lir N - _ to W YJ o t• k3,/ L 3 n O I 4-1- 10-SN. S 335 A; //,,F ,M • N ';, ZZ° 1,aoP s 3in rziv-- �.98csY) SW -� o • � wr .f. • - _3i7 13 • uI P - • 30 0 Q03 •k 46G —1E� 3a le . N��- ZG_ 81 >, 8105149° s ZZ-`7 14°i 41/��' '(a _ ge,°o�°�e • aka z, Z4 t5 b -o9b•53 REN SP 138 _ a �.3' �_ - 05 • ^ 28 e • r • — �`y�a o �s +r� Pi•-• „ ' 6 s `�o Ts o • tr o V, t 6• • i o 3' "4 � �� 17- o N sigl "i6 WAY :.,-. 8 g ti y w - - 15 ' , N � J GE Pv 4 L kb a ! ktoN --:z �, p �( i- z 1. zo i9 Fa. 74Z7E,i- - :NJ SAG•o'' ° 1 _ 3Z1 2. 53 G R A • t LI 0. -:.6 A ) /2 31 _s V• .. - s z4- a� L ' , i , - ; - ,o,.,96'-1s`"g"` W 6 ' 29g I wQ ) • s6 3� z9 z6 z7 p V'h14 pprAD - -r r T; i' e°¢ah H` 59 6° 6 s� `^' II , Mro1,l, JVh'C;o F35 'Sr 30 • • 1'y �5k 1 9 -� • vv 1 :o m 54 SS 5'6 '7" ' . • fhb S. 6 k • IR T �� ' 4- 3 Z 1 O 0 �,K0 �1 Y� sI Sl 5�94 `53'�t� m R Rio Sw.57 '� 6 �j 49 � .ai = 7 - '1 2 8 i L 6 47.1 ' 1 Y am. N�• �- o V650.1W S 'f U r I . r� 9 s-�f L/ . �1 • 4 4 IS S r- o• -r- - -r - 1 , O sa L4s� 3a 14 /3 fr. 4' ^�u �A� - J qo "�� az ,�3 ra 7�-�9'S2E Cs ',.4'• is. 3 2 h uj o 1,P411 `�, b 15 �S 0 39 8 0 - '� - r Y (2S ��b - 0 I - •55 36 + --r I tl -r� h :6•'• C oA v--7 , - 3'� 3 i I I Z 0 . N ti ^ w ^o v7 L '��Z Go �Z 10 cJ "T. — —� T i ' ►si 'd' I S <,� yb3 5 •� I 3 P ^ f a! ✓' i 17 I f 6; i j h (1J p b� ,�10 o `-�"J' 30 3 19 r E I 617 _ o b ,6.s' �b6 • �a ► 'I ZB , ^ 2 1 1-1 - ,, 2 I v h. 1g 9 ' 1 _ • I o 4 31 6 a a os . 1�6 1 a o 1 1 , k , „,,.--, .(i*< -K` o e79 a(11 2 Z� 23 24 ^ ^ .. .� - �1 y e cs o4 s ^ to "� ��~`1 n ��'_�`fq� �'�j�,� _ c�.-7 9 ZC I - I j \ 56 3C O • k `jJ I J (7� 61 6Z �0.\a �4 _r� 18 JI ^ .. �.J 3S 31 30l ��.51 o ��0 Sh Q , �3 a , • 6.77 •\• :� 2 'r 1 0 �6 S7 - 59 ;• •�B 1 30 ' G�a.+n Ay ;3 z 0 0`,/7 �� � k' I -5 53 - ,su• ay.> �?�° „ r-� 1 6 5 °0! INp� L 49 5�i 1 �v 77 ib a G w. III sl:s8 r p ` '1- II S:i .. 8 1 0, Mb 7 / a1 ti H a 4-1 __1 ' . • S - , -J ••: 13 12 1 ao0 " . 9 i .„,, Act AP Ai i L .�� 1' i - a i 46 • 9T 4boZ ,rl Su' v 3p 3 tl I_. . �--�. 5. EXHIBIT E BASIN STUDY 6052.002[BH/sm] To determine if flood insurance is available.contact an insurance agent or To determine if flood insurance is available,contact an insurance agent or call the National Flood Insurance Program at(800)638-6620. call the National Flood Insurance Program at teo0)638-6820. lithliiiir lfi APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET .1000 0 1000 500 0 F—+ r—i I--i I H--i r—I . . 500I 111111111111111 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FIRM FIRM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP KING COUNTY, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON AND WASHINGTON AND INCORPORATED AREAS INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 360 OF 1725 PANEL 354 OF 1725 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTED) 1 CONTAINS: ! CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX a KING COUNTY, KING COUNTY, UNINCORPORATED AREAS 530071 0360 F UNINCORPORATED AREAS 530071 0354 F KIRKLAND,CITY OF 530081 0360 F KIRKLAND,CITY OF 530081 0354 F REDMOND,CITY OF 530087 0360 F WOODINVILLE,CITY OF 530324 0300 F MAP NUMBER MAP NUMBER 53033C0360 F 53033C0354 F •CY M,,,t, MAP REVISED. MA .: ;I MAP REVISED:MAY 16, 1995 A, • 1 MAY 16, 1995, y 1 `�1 a , `0 b J Federal EmergencyMane emeat'A$ i �t`.�-,s' t Federal Emergency Management Agency I I • ii S� si_ F54 r yF' wS ,,,.2jx' Tn Z „ i�E,l„ -';^� .,... i / 1 i 2 ': y- ' s F s�xfiill. t• ' NTH STREET • N ;" ZONE X 3 N LLI a g a SITE 19 I -f tvx x' Northern s"%',-Ems='�:.��: .x�`:s'"oe t�,"^Z gisl 1..* Iiiirgs "‘I\ ‘ • LU LU rt Ill �a�£ ; 42Zs;-d=.-ai Abandoned Channel STREET "' Sm. 131n >': u .. ,. '>, ,=£, .1 ZONE AE .' r :_` ZONE X - M:- = 1011 �� IIIII"I x-. :,>..,sad ;mot .. s's(:';„ %S CFFt LLI w-- ,: >„ E ZONE AE 3 W CL :.ell ,:. FziY'SS�_1Fi.,,-3,r,.',%ii" � - 3x-` ;;,` '1a w v:q -• STREET 4`- -°"'=^` ~` SOUTHWEST 16TH �.v;#� � � ••.. 334 ^ --.mx.::^;M x,-" �.;,.w�', '^��'w�,;trc,,y.,.,. ,.;=-:sS,rij:n.,3 r III :ri s.. ,'x''s,;,�-n.r- caG-". r'.,,,..„, ; •• `4'" _ .x, ZONE X ". '"==`"_` xa= ::; a. •;:,:� «: ss�=`r^. - m �x m .,. .,,"..SL,`,> ::s r.t, ,:;F;-=:;. r;<ik•x - TZ - :4-r":ram:r'�t: , >.;, -'7...-(- +} <«w,.i,.,„;;x x.£,s:i` z.s:.-r , ."y 5. •-'`,si" ,� �5.5x_-:a-4w=.,.. ,..,-.,_r 6 d4,x:, �a .a�=<�,.��n,,::�£..'�£;:^.;,�';x,,r Kxz4'. ;%,�;y`rtt�='�;"' .�Mj�;S•;'•�?='=:=i=`•,-M.;. "��" -,.„,', ;g^or„a•:,r r ti -%%: ,.r,�. z£SyEkFM ''": • ;.>k xY•'' ;.t_"M -'„ : = -..;:<:. ." -,-„'t,,-;:,.,,.,, t o +V.:• > s s : ., ,.w .,r,. �.,gxtx? ;e.'::y". _,r„_-•::„,:, s:• : •,,,,•5::?-:T:.m 7X'= :;:w'r< �, ..rz^^,�',. '>„-_..',.. � Y'iz 5 .,,.," , .,~' ;^'k,,,,-.S,,, ..., :.':.' ..iti^ Z,':s ,..t.. ;L",-,.s",za--..,.^k... .r_ �Fra,;'Jr6 aY £: i' :l�'"rx;, ='.?i:SFc•:� .,.-_ s k'a:. -:s'.- ; �-��m' 3>a- �'�.i:fi� W' w,:'s' -a. :;;>Frg> �s�±>:> ,.. 3'a` ,.. ,s ,.> ._,^ - ,M" ", i- 5�->-f;r^,s:;F `• . - - e. » _ sa> . «c.r ,.,._ .. ,..,_ n^.. ,_„ ,_ '4".,:,:,x,»." %s Se ;," »:, • , ,,o.,,,Fr:::'=>: ,o a_+^,",.,"x..,- « ,r. . re.,:xY,,,.--.,..,z,-,., _.,aa:r .;;;.....". .�:, ._u. . ,.,,. ^.„.. .-„x:-:«,w_„ ._ ,�",�:r_ ..,x_�,._ ..": ^...., ,„%�.,.... ....". it?Mz%�r; ..�.,�. Y l:,tx•_?.E::.=��. .e. ;.>_....,",Zew<:i".,. ...,^..s> ....w..8•�.,,c.st„, �. ...,: ki ,v.,.,, n,,..s._,.z^-;' ,ts'�::Y;4, �-_,._„ dr;....._a_.... E,;^v..;. s-x';'„'s,'sr!>'"-w'`•;,';<` =:,�_ a.;is,z.. >;., s.,.,: x.^ .^x._ ...._"-,.�: y , a.,,". � 3w.._,,,.""...., _^,".� "^_ .;;.�,«..,..tx'xxx �;?>?' Mz�,,<ti.'%":::s:• •.e-.E_;:::z,,s,,.ks- -. �:a>w.. �, _ - - - x^ `<i :�5?« -• -,. .,•. , ,. .'� .>,...._,. r -,:..".;rx,-«s.:r _ .,�:w x-'x m: .,„_:r?;#z,.".„«« .�1�' :w,.. �:a_ ,.� :,Mr,:.�x.wau,.. . . . .<...�>, .r5_, _, ,,,r.� „_t_ ��Ma3E _,. �'a-_F.... ,, _ __, ,M ... ,,5" �' `'_- ,r� �. `,,2 x ax}_.,' 5*•:�,z„r ,::cf.:a•;,••• _ „ F •-;,^•:,;'.•';?F:;• ,- .� �, .. .^..,,.._.. ;'� ._ .. r�� " _:�. " _ ..._, mu «..._. .. :'••rx:M 5���=� ,..x «:,zx',,,> Y�s�£££ ;i�sa" w>�.5. _�:t�'S'•�' ���` ., '�� _....;.;,..,, k-,-,S. , e..."..>�vxz;w....." „<^>,..;,. ;n, ,> �, is,.. ^r..,,,E_5�' («--..,,:.. , , a.. "� w:f;'�s?•i�'� s.,y�sz �tc <t2�- . ., r:3• " , .,..^.x. ,.,..,._ c;, ..xr' � __ ..",,."_ „-_:=r:, - w:z'?�.z. „_X^.'<; 'Y,ty-: ,- »„".„ .., ,.: ^w , ,^.. - s,�+ ;-sx._>..: _ ...:x,,_.^.. .. . ,z tF,...,c„..i...,,,,xt::�.," a, .:ss: Est .x ;.•''<? :. c� ,s. .,,z ,,,,,, ,, ; ,,; .,:,:i . -4•;.'•.�r.a.,,,x.>,.,, .>,-k , < ,r , . ...,:,ri.r;- stx -.xi.-,; ,.. _ ^. . ,,,".. ,..,,E� '� "<, .>....,, _" ..,.. .__._. ,,.."._..." ..,., n ,..,_ .,, , µ&... 3;e`;; �=x�'�:•��c�..;"., ,'-gip' S •_ma,..,_. .. >;._.,.-" s". • ., , ;xx. ,_ .,.... ,._. ...:........ ,x.5. ",.. c,_,iss.,y,,. <,-,>::,...".a.�„..s.•„.•a:� . _ „.,, :3 ., „-,-,�*,.,P•;;• f.." .d, F't%a;;o x.ris`s-:^ .,. ;�',z'a„ ,^ _ ^ r....�„ , ..", .e.^s•.,ci_ -.,,,., ^^." .r, _ ,.. .. ' ^s«... c- ,s . .;„ . ._^:.�.^--{x .p7 _.`.„q� "��: "- , a.. .,... ..., -._ c... , ^_ .:,._ "a , x,,. , ,. £."r ,"" .. ._ .;'nrn ?S>£a^3~c' _yz -.h,>•,. s, , =s� r r, ,.! a._ .; ,�b >n.,�', mot - .�. .'W,. ^ ..�;aax' ._ �. r,_.^H.,.-_..,'x __. 2m .s.,.".,%E.":. ,. e,�.. -3a";- », w" x ,..i ^ .," 3':. k;�,:: �;r%�:xK :E�x%.�.. ,,:�;-��r;;,, ra't: • . .-• _ _,. , , ,..5 ,,, ,,-• _„, _:^: _ • _ ,,..„., -..•, a, ,-te.;; _ _ 'q;,' _„ .. _�'< ,. ."-.•x R ,-'- u � �,:Y_ f x._xL`"'< Few;-�5-'Fz ^ »+' `i". , ._ .a7 %!:/•F.z �5 N'i� <:Jz:^.�:fi�oz'as•:gip . .. .. •.-. x,,..a.. . . .. .,'fi -e-i^.�. _r' , _i wr.Y,�,j��z..,. -..,. "s,, n;.Ya ^'j. µ. ,:Y�''„x_4;•-'.,?:/=^F9.,..s„ �� �'.�.$`,�x,..��^.....— G<:rSiis'a`:ra.::=...^:,< F 9 ;!, ,,,, xa t. x e :4-,%,Z. -...,. "`i,"z , .,.,ems, 5'n r'F« ,£rvre'..,.'" -y :-',..= •,.,ir _ ,3' C£.- h?:: y ,L°- ate e a> "•'(^„ax a,'.£ '_^:£»` 'x:E. .•u+_-: ?•rkx s' ,,:�r`iv:,t 4 '•''g 5 2., - < r,. ...w="x: _'�.L:' ^;Mir:^;�;:.�a zr_.•. "• •. .12, ,4... s?zs ,^, ,,e--„3. :,r' ?!x S''3 • 5#.x;- `3 r-�.. ,•: =.-, <i yak :3,>-,: r t�' _'Y�j„ e<r . sx 't`e„- _ ^ri _ -x.",,r,a •o. ,,., c,,...« "v, s: ,,,, .z.r.,.__ . .7,7, aµ'''' ...,..��>%a:•'', ,.'--- ..air - _- `= ,-,,..,,,�«<_ " -' -- '�_..'�<;Y� _ 'a. ,,..«,. .«3,•.'es ,.»r.. 5."r -s,_. ,..r_s::�':`....__., r-... .+^•' R f,o �5 ..., x.. _ .r•» �,,,>...">..z.- a <-i '>:.� .,�i^3 t -.;,v?::: .s: .%S,".3"^...�..:F,•R, s" ,:,x " ,•.�-.�,r, ra'� „ .<.>... E;.... s� , �n .' ,k`= ��:'_ R r rnS A. 49.rw'. �>FS:�: , w .. ,�,. . .,�.,^, , .«.. "".^r.: ...x,.� .. . ; ;,., .r r,FLMc';l;:-F' �'s- %:�B.t3- , , . "z M�-.<£eM1v".,.•... «-.'Fsr�- , ..p.«„- ,%t L.} ..,- c .,. r.., .r.-;`.'<^ ^.,., z..:;x•" �=. :.. ., . 5,�.,. �:C};::^��ei�; ' ':•: ,,:.-uz.i-' ::e�.. �nY_ ,-c., .aJ x::;._.f• x..y;.i--.. . ,-.,L.,%i_„a-."�`'a:t-�_ "_g;y.,e �:jn,.'s�1.x,ii..a s . S. 7:2r. ^i:,z✓c... ...r .;Y. a?:;t4-".1 �k «: W.<.;.n. 's>,.w<'w- Ts t; ;,i.rr'i% z::';,'..r.,. „k,<,. :'..," Z vim. 4- :Sti . ,F%:" 'a'1`-xw _ -- z.'x N ` x�3a'sa a';: _>F ,5 ��',rt zELY:w r tl •-�xi.?r,.::��i 'F%L 3' K .�i ...YY 3' 'sF _ ?K„ •• E b iz'•» ?x � - � x.„fN'f"s i sF�'c c.Y_ { ' :¢F:� ,=' .,,./ a..«-'..s.._ ,�' : t y,.Jy^..5..� t:-G?YSn�:" ....sa ,."Ha, ,..:£• %• .S, , "..- . Y"^, .,. . .<,,., .r�«, x .<._.>�z;.< �-, ::--r � _-.x.:.r i ty,:�,rYa.i'--_.,,.35;:.. ,.,`, z,.,Y.':� :'s s_.^^,_.n.: r_.,,Ef s.,.R, ,:, " �.,-w,,n,Rr- <x^,- y". `0 _Y`L.,',ug•• .. .,.. -.,� .. _ ., __ ,._F, a„ ir^..n .,.G-e �'`•_: d£f>...w.`.£3....k:<rn..2-i 'li>- J�..">'x:. .rz.si., .:+.Fl•r':'F�,%.".,:.n .`'<�-a,:e». -,?!,,•,.,y:.. - •,,z y:�'4.CN,;,. , ,M_`'p�,,,..,1,",_.a�.w.• .,.,>; Y�: ..�., �S _ -?a..sx �w ^f;.,,n, a'�a>'%e� C:•b�`.'•.,:•;:_z�,,.w , ..,..,..:,s ,,:. •�.yr�:n....,.. ..>,c„�i.. ....,,F'-YSr_,., iz.,.a+E' x' ':Y. <w.x.:.<,.:.,r.,::�.n:v:Ernt,r.$a::anln'.v,},.,,,«, �;.r, _ _ _x, -;c: .�. r P>t.£•>'�: ^ c, � �.• icy,:- w •^i;« r«.£x .,. • ��3,. •• `�,. _�.,.,. .;,:.*:.. �<�"%;. ,«�•-tea ,:a�'.:?>z:'€`fi,"-'s::.���-• �r;'.' �i +:X'<< z�`. ;:.?-l~ < was:1'"`w^«_ „'w'+s:,;'"E':,. ,:r-E ,.r,:c«�3,y<t�rx xr -.C�"-;;:.;._,.: -.:;^`s'> �;,?„-.•c>' • ac.+::..,T.•�Y-'' !'-" 55 • r>y•:>m "Y;-,✓3w fi-:;•,t r,r.,"'safi-<sri' j ,:" -ytz:�a:^i 'i^' -•`"^• ^Nf o34: 35<^l.H �. ,. ;)„ 'i:^=y,. c ih'`n~'r: r "� �Y' k'. _-��. ` 2 .:03 ,75 5. . '. . ,q''a'' L� i'" `:'e'.tit"%u'F==k>:i' s,. '? -"r'gr?%�=. b. 01111 el„::i-,', x'fi ,� CPIx 3_ - �€ r» P �tt s ^"' Y " z ,� :M�. «a - «.pis^-{.L_fir', ' f% �X>:' £ "`�'M' �. `wy a;=t• , 7:7, `",^•L`i%; , x' .4n !:5:..., _ • x^'�e.-'`"' w•�`. �h�/.. .-F - ...v 1�ry ,�x ."�r -Y ^'-y_.rr .t...5, ��n�i _ �t - :::T'=- ,r',ss;• "a'. .� - ,a,^•:~ sc• sh; - ,- ,,„r,;.<3:. ,14,•-' '•:: "-c;:K -1 a ,. -::z*---T_x .,...-. Y:.%.--,'s�.. .,`� , 35.,,,,,,;•'3, :"„x�. 2,1,,2 _••.,-, ,7 /.,., 4 ",,, ,,,,,....,- ,y.F,'' _, ,.--rs"5-,,,"' �'''ai_ w:r,� 4 - i�.' ;wr�;M..u:r`' =:' '-.ESY ,.'�"_s'�^- . 'k" �>H'aiM >:'tair; ,. >?wx s;�w ;.*��s=�=�, zM✓`-'..,�,_'; ..`�;-ro;-'^ ;��,.,^�.s� ;.x ==sat e�:;2�'a«="'n=iry i,�, ,�;�b 3'�'"' `�< � , .r..�__s>-.>_�<ia ��"�"^� z":, •',_::�.sr .:Wiz.-_K a.��x3:.:�::;?:F� :'ice-':... �_3r; -1 ,,," _."' .-'5�22.-,:,r"".•,, w_ %•w�" -ti::.,x ^4 ,..-.a:,u;-.. Yx, -•;,,3w x:r.,. � =:••"�r:+-:.x;a ".- sc?•4^iT" �+�' a^ r"':, f�' >:Lsx._,:~•Y<•. ��,s">-:Fei "�'�s•=z - �z,»z;?c...^.re:"Y :'za�o�_,ta^w?sT= z��r3z ' �'. »;'�,a�x,•?E`:`,�a 2^^;,,i:�� . i.:?q;pa:? -»i:-. ..o.r•`;„s,,. =,. ", ,r'r« " ,ce.,- :..�'" 6..h« /., _.:;� ::Yz4—. -- -2„,--> SM;`-,''xx, ,',-a';':,;,-,;-'�,�-�' ,^-� u�s ,t,r.t: :,.t r: .. i,-7:. a {€ -,. •-'[• "i-�. �- ,^.�. ��.nr •,L,'�'-'.-+•> i7�'y� ,C�.`•,s _ ..;��^_�'-`« .:,,t,^,-E,p xv„--sg<` ei;,•w?:Sr�<;:",_ •"s�,3 .w�.r.,:.x� �,,w.-.�,.«.�.u., ...:. �S :.44.,, F";;';=r;za _'c eaz.p 5` ,,•tg- ,1,--DADA-, s' sr'r ,<: -.rz-,:,:3_z':.,•••2.•-•••,;,M£,a?; 'zi: '- ra•t.,r.^"„»-r-4 .. .x,w.w..«,:.a 1....t- x'1'z-` k£. '' ,� "s-":.,x»:„,4,_.5 _ 'r'?, , ��:`'"_;L..., ,,,r-'. _' �_ - .cti,,<,zr: ,;^';`, :?;r%;>;i: s- ,-y :�-'`,fac .-t<.s,�?s<-1'o°•�. ..�.•.eI :'•$� r'.F.�.E2 n,--,:.,,.,;< xr.u.; ;;�:`�«,..4.;<a;i-=.n, ;>��,a>t.,i-,-,.xr�I _ =';�;£:_,c.� ,,,::t.,,,ms;, - .w ',,t., ,� _ rta:�a''S ,p,g z 3z "" '-�'a_N35 .::lf'':.Mca.�z.re. - :;.5:,',..pis>-,.3xs�,,�.-,:"_�}- ' .a ..a.,�'�ra'`zcy _... f<«�`t;.. ;rm,<a"?�'337 ,pR.r" < �;^''%"::.:'"R� -"^.,.t.x;.:eri" � 1E�»�"_•S:?-^�w,z'",':.-.e:'.«=''...:'<�7-..0..=,,,Sz..._.,?::._,.,"x..... RECONNAISSANCE REPORT NO. 14 BLACK RIVER BASIN JUNE 1987 Natural Resources and Parks Division and Surface Water Management Division King County, Washington P:BR.TOC/mlm TABLE OF CONTENTS • I. SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. FINDINGS IN BLACK RIVER BASIN 2 A. Overview 2 B. Effects of Urbanization 4 C. Specific Problems 5 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS 7 A. Expand existing and/or construct additional R/D facilities 7 B. Preserve wetlands on plateau to provide natural storage 7 C. Protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides 7 D. Reduce sedimentation in streams along valley floor 7 E. Enforce prohibitions against dumping domestic trash 7 F. Increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management 8 V. MAP 9 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: . Estimated Costs A-1 APPENDIX B: Capital Improvement Projects Rating List B-1 APPENDIX C: Detailed Findings and Recommendations C-1 P:BR.TOC/mlm 1. SUMMARY - Black River Basin, located in south King County, is named for a river that ceased to exist in 1917, after major alterations to river systems were made to build the Lake Washington ship canal. The reconnaissance was conducted along:the streams and tributaries still remaining in this basin. Development in the basin in and around the cities of Kent, Renton, and Tukwila has produced extensive areas of impervious surface, which are expected to double by the time the basin reaches its development capacity. Storm runoff from impervious surfaces is drained through pipes and discharges in some cases directly into the stream system. Field investigation of problems in the Black River Basin revealed that volumes and rates of stormwater flows have contributed to serious acceleration of erosion of streambanks and lower slopes and have produced downcutting and landslides in some places. Sedimentation resulting from these processes has, in turn, clogged existing conveyance systems, rendering many of them ineffective, and destroyed fish habitat for spawning, rearing, and migrating. In addition, the general inefficiency of the basin drainage system has increased the potential for flooding. Another problem cited was visibly poor water quality resulting from large amounts of domestic trash placed in streambeds and from commercial/industrial runoff, particularly near the Longacres Racetrack in Renton. Recommendations for action in the Black River Basin include: 1) expanding R/D facilities and preserving wetlands to assure adequate stormwater storage, 2) taking measures to protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides; 3) reducing sedimentation on the valley floor with sediment traps, 4) increasing enforcement of regulations against the dumping of trash into streams, and 5) increasing the overall effectiveness of surface water management in the basin through doing more maintenance of facilities, continuing intergovernmental agreements, lowering volumes and rates of release for stormwater, and other measures. H. INTRODUCTION: History and Goals of the Program In 1985 the King County Council approved funding for the Planning Division (now called the Natural Resources and Parks Division), in coordination with the Surface Water Management Division, to conduct a reconnaissance of 29 major drainage basins located in King County. The effort began with an initial investigation of three basins -- Evans, Soos, and Hylebos Creeks -- in order to.determine existing and potential surface water problems and to recom- mend action to mitigate and prevent these problems. These initial investigations used available data and new field observations to examine geology, hydrology and habitat conditions in each basin. Findings from these three basins led the King County Council to adopt Resolution 6018 in April 1986, calling for reconnaissance to be completed on the remaining 26 basins. The Basin Reconnaissance Program, which was subsequently established, is now an important ele- ment of surface water management. The goals of the program are to provide useful data with regard to 1) critical problems needing immediate solutions, 2) basin characteristics for use in the preparation of detailed basin management plans, and 3) capital costs associated with the early resolution of drainage problems. The reconnaissance reports are intended to provide an evaluation of present drainage con- ditions in the County in order to transmit information to policymakers to aid them in deve- loping more detailed regulatory measures and specific capital improvement plans. They are not intended to ascribe in any conclusive manner the causes of drainage or erosion problems; instead, they are to be used as initial surveys from which choices for subsequent detailed engineering and other professional environmental analyses may be made. Due to the limited amount of time available for the field work in each basin, the reports must be viewed as P:BR/jr Black River Basin (continued) ment. Details of the damage, along with suggestions for mitigation, are contained in later section of this report. Dominant geologic and geomorphic features. Black River Basin consists of the part of the Duwamish Valley east of the Green River and the western edge of the Covington drift plain, a plateau underlain by glacial deposits. Small creeks, which flow across its - rolling surface, have eroded deep, narrow ravines up to 1.5 miles into the plateau. Downcutting is migrating headward in the upper reaches, and erosion of banks and lower slopes causes landsliding in the canyon walls, most of which are naturally unstable. Both of these processes are accelerated by increased flows attributable to urbanization. Sediment is deposited where the streams flow onto the valley floor. The surface of the Covington drift plain is dominantly basal till, mantled in places with recessional outwash or deposits of post-glacial lakes. Near the edge of the plateau are several lenses of sediment deposited adjacent to a glacier lobe in the Duwamish Valley. Older sediments are exposed in the ravines and bluffs. In the north, unconsolidated sediments lap up onto the southern limb of the Newcastle anticline; sedimentary and volcanic rocks crop out in the bluffs north of Panther Creek and form the Renton, Talbot, and Earlington Hills in the northern end of the valley toward Tukwila. Coal was mined from this area from 1853 until the 1940s. The Duwamish Valley is part of a trough carved into the drift plain during the last glaciation; it later became an arm of Puget Sound. A catastrophic mudflow originating on Mount Rainier approximately 5700 years ago dumped massive amounts of debris into the trough. This and other events, plus the deposition of alluvial sediment, expelled the salt water. Through the nineteenth century, the combined White and Green Rivers meandered through the valley. Near Renton, the Cedar River flowed into the Black which drained Lake Washington and flowed into the Duwamish. Beginning in 1906 a series of changes was made to these river systems. The Cedar River was diverted into Lake Washington, and the White River was diverted south to the Puyallup. The Black River itself ceased to exist. Geomorphic processes in the Black River Basin are most active on the western edge of the plateau. Lakes and wetlands formed here in the poorly drained swales. Where conditions of drainage and percolation are appropriate, small streams flow between the drumlins, eroding deep ravines into the unconsolidated sediments in the process. Over time, the ravines have been widened by mass-wasting of their walls (a process aided by groundwater) and erosion by tributary creeks; their upper ends have migrated their upstream into the plateau. Sediment carried by these streams was deposited in the Duwamish trough; after the trough became an alluvial valley, small fans formed on its edge. Hydrologic and hydraulic features. There are three distinct geographic features asso- ciated with the hydraulics of Black River Basin: the plateau east of the Lower Green River Valley, the steep (5-35°) erosive hillsides, and the flat floodplain of the valley floor. Mill, Garrison, Springbrook, and Panther Creeks, as well as three small, unnamed tri- butaries (0023, 0006B, and 0006C), all originate from locations on top of the plateau. Panther Creek originates from Panther Lake and the surrounding wetlands. The P:BR/j r 3 Black River Basin (continued) Earlier discussions pointed out the serious effects this is producing in the form of ero- sion and sediment transport to lower stream reaches. Additionally, sedimentation decreases the efficiency of the entire basin drainage system by filling culverts and chan- nels. This in turn increases the potential for flooding. The city of Kent removes an estimated 1,100 cubic yards of sediment annually from its sediment facility at Mill Creek Park. The Washington State Department of Transportation also employs a regular cleaning schedule to remove gravel and sediment from its culvert under South 212th Street on Tributary 0023. Sediment from Springbrook Creek has been transported downstream from the erosive hillside to a pri- vate trout farm west of Talbot Road and rendered it inoperative. Similar examples occur throughout the basin along the bottom of the steep hillside and east of State Road 167. Erosion is further accelerated by drainage outlets from developments and public areas. Discharge from a pipe into Garrison Creek adjacent to Benson Road freefalls for approximately 10 feet before scouring the ravine it enters. Similar erosion occurs on Tributary 0006B where water is discharged from the Fred Nelson Junior High School across Benson Road to the top of a severely eroded ravine. An onsite detention facility downstream at the Victoria Hills housing development accumulates large amounts of sediment. Its capacity is decreasing, and the function of the facility is threatened. • The development trends in this basin mean that land for regional R/D facilities will become more difficult to obtain at:the same time that erosion and potential for flooding are increasing. Additional problems may arise if existing onsite R/D systems malfunction from improper design br construction or from lack of maintenance. An onsite facility for a privately developed trailer park, located west of the Benson Road adjacent to Garrison Creek, exemplifies the potential hazard. Unstable fill was placed on the steep ravine and an R/D pond built on its edge. The fill becomes saturated when the pond is in use, and tension cracks in the fill along the slope indicate potential failure. Such an event would add large amounts of sediment to the drainage system. Development may create similar problems elsewhere if the proper design, construction, inspection, and maintenance of R/D facilities is neglected. C. Specific Problems Identified Black River Basin exhibits serious problems throughout its system, with exceptions only in the south fork of Springbrook Creek and on Panther Creek in subcatchment 10. The most significant problems noted by the field team during its investigation are listed below. 1. Stream channel erosion accelerated by the muting of runoff from developed areas into streams. Major problems exist in the ravines, where streams are cutting into till at the upper ends of canyons and associated landsliding and surface erosion occur (see section 3 below). Although these processes have been taking place naturally for a long time, increased runoff from developing areas on the plateau is causing acceleration of the erosion. a. The worst cases of erosion observed include those on Mill Creek (0005), P:BR/jr 5 Black River Basin (continued) IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION Habitat, erosion, landsliding, and flooding problems in the Black River Basin can be addressed by the measures identified below. Most of the solutions listed here will mitigate specific problems observed during field investigation or will prevent similar problems in the future. However, additional recommendations have been included to suggest administrative or regulatory measures that would increase the overall effectiveness of surface water management in this basin. A. Expand existing and/or construct additional regional R/D facilities on the plateau in order to control storm flows that originate there. Site facilities upstream of the four large creek ravines that are experiencing the worst damage. Facilities should be regional in scope and should follow the general specifi- cations outlined in Appendix A of this report. These will impede the direct conveyance of runoff into the steep, naturally erosive ravines, thereby reducing erosion rates that result in sediment transport and slope instability and that damage habitat. B. Preserve wetlands on the plateau to provide natural storage. In addition, reconsider Panther Lake for use as a regional R/D site. Although the lake has been classified as a #1-C wetland, the amount of storage it offers is substantial with a moderate addi- tional (.25-to .50-foot) fluctuation in depth. - C. Protect steep valley walls from erosion and landslides caused from direct discharges of stormwater: 1. Tightline discharges or provide other appropriate nonerasive conveyance over steep hillsides; provide energy dissipation at the outfalls. This has already been done at several points on Mill Creek (Tributary 0005) with good results. • 2. Consider rerouting flow in cases where tightlining or other methods arc not feasible. For example, runoff from the area southeast of Springbrook Creek might be piped down Southeast 200th Street rather than routed into the north fork (0021) as it is now. 3. Lower the potential for landslides by restricting development in and along the tops of ravines. In particular, strongly discourage filling along the edges; the fill at Benson Road above Garrison Creek (0022) will probably have to be removed. D. Reduce sedimentation in streams along the valley floor in cases where sedimentation is not adequately prevented by R/D and other upstream measures. In extreme cases (probably including Panther Creek [0006]), construct sediment traps (with convenient access for removal of accumulated material) at points where streams flow onto the valley floor. E. Increase enforcement of regulations against the dumping of domestic trash into ravines and stream channels. The Seattle-King County Health Department and the King County office of Building and Land Development should he asked to investigate this ongoing problem and to take appropriate action when violators are identified. P:BR/jr 7 • BLACK RIVER BASIN _ , ,,,.- - Basin Boundary ----- Subcatchment Boundary ° 9j: Collection Point ; °o o ZL - Stream 1 f` rnr, • Tributary Number 's , • o 00301 Proposed Project o A 03 0006 . 1. 4 ra •:., ,,,,,--'41,1.• . ,,..4. Off. 1.. •.Th. , o vs 1 0 �� rmr • 1__._:=• _i - Mu. r t o oc July, 1987 4.w'».. . •ic ,,o'*-- '6 0 • i o °o n 030 0 0301 ;1, ,` °ola • . 030„9:%.,w jjp/!\ . • • /14 1 - 0O�. -' 0023 €ef ''ts �s `jC10;2_ ra if ' C 0345 \ kii s ', -- ' , 450, \ cti / ''' :RYQ76"-4fr Q F h fl s 1.0O , 17 O° 0 •it 00 07 o°` ' APPENDIX A ESTIMATED COST: PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BLACK RIVER BASIN * Indicates project was identified by Surface Water Management office prior to reconnaissance. NOTE: All projects are located on map included in this report. Project Collect. Estimated Costs Number Point Project Description Problem Addressed and Comments 0301* 10 Increase R/D capacity of Panther Reduce erosion and flooding $345,000 Lake by constructing earthen downstream in Panther (Panther Lake is #1 berms and outlet control Creek. " ' Wetland and will require" structure. Trib. 0006, RM 3.40. agreement to use as R/D site. Further biological study also needed at time of basin planning.) 0302* 22 Provide regional R/D facility by Prevent erosion to sensitive $208,000 constructing earthen dam across slopes downstream of (Project costs should drainage Swale. Provide control proposed site by be shared with City structure and overflow spillway on reducing peak flows. of Renton.) Trib. 0021 at RM .40 (Springbrook Creek). 0303* 29 Construct instream R/D facility at Reduce erosion and flooding of $125,000 point where Benson Rd. crosses of Garrison Creek by reducing (Project should be Garrison Creek. Reinforce peak flows, constructed in conjunction Benson Rd. Construct outlet-control with proposed Projects structure around existing cross 0304 and 0305.) culvert R.M. 1.40. P.BR.APA/mlm A-1 APPENDIX B - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RANKING BLACK RIVER BASIN Prior to the Black River Basin field reconnaissance, seven projects had been identified and rated using the CIP selection criteria developed by the Surface Water Management (SWM) and Natural Resources and Parks Divisions. Following the reconnaissance, seven projects remain proposed for this' area. They include one new, previously unidentified and unrated project. This displaces one previously selected project, which was eliminated based on the consensus of the reconnaissance team because no problem was apparent in the field. The previous SWM capital improvement project list for the Black River Basin had an estimated cost of $1,250,000, while the revised list increases to an estimated cost of $1,280,000. This 2.4 percent increase in estimated capital costs is due mainly to upward revised cost figures for securing or acquiring easements over wetlands and costs associated with a new project to solve a previously uni- dentified problem. The following table summarizes the scores and costs for the CIPs proposed for the Black River Basin. These projects were rated according to previously established SWM Program Citizen Advisory Committee criteria. The projects ranked below are those for which the first rating question, ELEMENT 1: "GO/NO GO," could be answered affirmatively. These projects can be considered now for merging into the "live" CIP list. RANK PROJECT NO. SCORE COST 1 0302* 125 $ 208,000 2 0303* 110 125,000 3 0309 100 26,000 4 0301* 95 345,000 5 0305* 90 116,000 6 0307* 60 309,000 7 0304* 55 151.000 TOTAL $1,280,000 * Indicates project was identified by the Surface Water Management Division prior to reconnaissance. P:BR.APB. B-1 APPENDIX C DETAILED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDA'I'IONS BLACK RIVER BASIN All items listed here are located on final display maps in the offices of Surface Water Management, Building and Land Development, and Basin Planning. Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item* River Mile Point Category Prop. Pro'. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 1 0005 3 habitat Fish ladder through pump Based on the condition of Develop and implement a comprehensive RM .30 plant. Automatic counter the basin habitat and future Black River basin plan in agreement records all returning development, these numbers with all local jurisdictions. anadromous species will probably decrease. Habitat improvement would be one goal (apx. 84 in 1986). of this plan. 2 0005 12, 6 Habitat Drainage district has Condition will continue. - Contact drainage district about RM 1.30- removed all stream cover the feasibility of select platnt- 4.65 along drainage channel. ings along the ditch levees. Water quality looks very - Develop a plan to address point poor. Some oil and suds on and nonpoint water quality surface, also very turbid problems originating from the water. thousands of acres of commercial and industrial land in the basin. 3 0005 18 Habitat Large amounts of sediment More erosion, sedimentation, - Increase size and number of R/D RM 8.30- moving down the stream and loss of fish habitat. facilities upstream to reduce 8.70 system has filled in flow volume and rates to non- all the pools. Kent removes erosive levels. 1,100 cubic yards of sedi- ment from Mill Creek at Canyon Park annually. P:BR.APC/mlm C-1 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point . Catec,ory Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations • 8 0005 19 I-Iabitat Fish blockage due to con- Condition will continue. Encourage State Fisheries person- RM 10.05 crete .and asphalt debris nel to organize a citizen-action piled in stream. project to construct a stepped pool or other solution to allow - fish passage. 9 0005 19 Habitat Native vegetation Livestock will erode stream- - Fence to provide a stream corri- RM 10.19- removed down to stream edge bank and defecate in stream dor. 10.30 and replaced by pasture. channel. This will result - Plant native plants or allow in erosion, sedimentation, natural revegetation along and water quality problems. streambanks. . 10 0005A 19 I Iydrology 0307 Tributary contributes to This 'area will continue to - Obtain required casements and RM 0.2 Mill Creek, which experien- develop and will contribute construct a regional R/D facility ces erosion and sediment greater runoff to the - •• in wetland area. transport. Wetland 0308 downstream conveyance system. - Construct berms along the western now provides some RID and The wetland area may be and northern sides of the existing has much more potential damaged by development wetland. capacity. • around the perimeter and this - Increase the storage capacity may decrease the ability of of the wetland by excavation. the surface water to infiltrate. • Runoff will continue to increase and erosion and • sedimentation will likewise continue. 11 0006 7 Habitat Stream flows throuth wet- Condition will continue. If anadromous fish were rein- RM .50- • land. No visible channel. troduced to Panther Creek, 1.40 Fish transit-through this wetland passage would need to he cattail wetland looks assured. A biological assessment difficult. by fisheries and wetland biolo- • . gists would be needed to formulate a viable solution. • P:I3R.APC/mlm • C-3 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 18 0006 8 Geology Large. landslide (transla- Slide will continue to Direct surface runoff away from RM 2.15 tional and rotational contribute to sedimentation top of slope to gravel pit Failure), with raw slope downstream. (to west). remaining; gullying of slope. Apparently caused by combination of under- cutting by stream and routing of road drainage over slope from above. 19 0006 10 Habitat Stream in good condition. Possible erosion and loss of - Maintain stream flows at non- RM 2.55- Setbacks and protective habitat if future develop- erosive levels 3.00 vegetation needed at points ment increases volume and - Maintain a natural stream corri- along the. stream. Some rate of flow. dor from Panther Lake down into good pools and spawning and along Panther Creek. gravel in a few places. 20 0006 10 Hydrology 0301 Panther Lake is a #1-C Future development in this The sensitive nature of the . RM 3.40 wetland that provides a area will triple the amount wetland would require precise large amount of natural of impervious area. The boundary surveys and control over storage; the downstream available area for regional the amount of water artificially system is in fair R/D facilities may soon be retained by the proposed control. condition with some exausted and the system Use Panther Lake as an R/D facili- erosion. The contributing will continue unchecked ty by constructing earthen berms drainage area is not downstream. Erosive on the north and west sides of the currently densely devel- soils throughout the area wetland area; construct a control oped. are further threatened outlet, enhance and increase the as higher amounts of runoff capacity of the downstream channel will increase the rate at (stabilize with vegetation), and which the existing stream obtain easements. erodes. • P:BR.APC/mlm C-5 Trill. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Catcgory Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 25 0006C 5 IIabitat Rolling Hills Creek exhib- Little change due to riprap None. its oil sheen on water in along stream to protect upper portion of the creek. sewer line that parallels Little or no fish habitat stream. (or potential) exists. • 26 0009 9 Geology Bank and lower-slope erosion Flows in tributary will in- - R/D in upper basin. RM-.00- in small tributary channel, crease; erosion will continue - Remove fill along stream. .15 especially behind construe- causing sedimentation down- tion equipment lot. stream and perhaps threaten stability of building. 27 0009 9 Ilabitat Lots of litter; stream has Worsening of water quality, - Reduce the volume and rate of water RM-.15-.20 extensive downcutting, bank sedimentation, and erosion. to non-erosive levels by new R/D. erosion, and bed load - Consider restricting future develop- movement. ment (down-zone). - Community action projects could remove litter. 28 0020 12 Habitat Sediment has destroyed fish Possible flooding and sedi- Remove sedimentation source (see also RM-.20 habitat. City of Kent mentation along S .192nd St. Trib. 0023, RM.95). removes sediment each year. 29 0020 21 Geology Bank erosion, landsliding Problems will continue. - Control storm flows. Increase R/D RM-.50- in canyon due to outfalls above RM .40 in 0021; reroute or .70 at end of SE 196th St. and control flows from vicinity of SE from R/D on 200th plus 200th-(tightline west on 200th). natural sensitivity - Provide energy dissipation at R/D (landslides). Heavy damage outfall (RM .40). in Jan. 86 storm. Sedi- - Restrict development on north side mentation above old road, of 0021 (runoff to be tightlined or and in trout farm below routed around ravine). Talbot Rd., as well as ero- sion in the ravine. P:BR.APC/mlm C-7 1" Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations • 33 0022 26, 28 Geology Bank cutting and slope Natural instability of - Increase RID capacity, especially RM-.20- failure in canyon of canyon walls is aggravated upstream of Benson Road. 1.40 Garrison Creek. Some ero- by increased flows from - Tightline flows to bottom of sion caused by outfall over upper part of catchment. canyon; provide energy dissipa- edges or flow out of tight- tion. lined culverts impinging on - Restrict further development on opposite banks. Deposition edges of canyon. in vicinity of SE 218 St. 34 0022 26 I-Iabitat Large sedimentation zone has Flooding of adjacent proper- Reduce flow rates and volumes RM-.30- filled channel and pools. ties due to rising strcambed to non-erosive levels. Then - . . . . _.. caused by sediment consider habitat improvements.. . deposition. such as large organic debris for pools and instream protection. 35 0022 29,28 Habitat Surface water runoff is More development will exa- Reduce flow rates to nonerosive RM-.30- 26 causing severe erosion and cerbate the problem. . levels by providing more RID. 2.30 sedimentation. Instream Stricter development controls by habitat for fish and benthic down-zoning development areas. organisms is very poor. Most pools are gone, in- stream large organic debris and bedload are both moving. 36 0022 28 Habitat Stream has a whitewashed, Worsening of existing Reduce stream flow rates and RM-.80 sterile look due to the problems. volumes to non-erosive levels. water volume and veloci- Then consider habitat improve- tics. These have created ments such as large organic debris a very unstable system for pools and instrcam protec- that has destroyed the tion. fish habitat and removed most fish, benthos, and macrophytes. P:BR.APC/mIm C-9 Trib. Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 41 0022 29 Hydrology 0303 See Item 40. See Item 40. Construct instream R/D facility RM 1.40 at intersection of Benson Rd. and Garrison Creek. Roadway would be reinforced to act as impoundment. Construct outlet control structure and tie to existing cross culvert. Check realignment schedule with WSDOT. Provide fish passage. • 42 0022 28 Hydrology 0304 See Item 40. See Item 40. Construct instream R/D facility RM 1.00 in Garrison Creek. Construct a dam across the ravine with an outlet control structure and an overflow spillway. Provide access road from SE 220th without increasing landslide potential. Project will provide fish passage. 43 0024 30 Hydrology 0305 See Item 40. See Item 40. Construct R/D facility. Would require excavation of soil, remo- val of existing vegetation, and construction of berms. Facility would require proportional discharge outlet and overflow spillway. 44 0023 27 Geology 7" Downcutting, undercutting Erosion in this ravine has - Control flows into canyon with RM .50- of lower slopes -- extreme been aggravated by R/D upstream of RM 1.00. .90 in upper reach (RM 0.70- increased flows from upper - If possible, route runoff (from 0.90); box-gully up to basin and runoff from resi- development to south RM .70-.90) 22' deep. Deposition in dential area to the south. around the canyon to S 212th St. field at mouth. Worst erosion occurs at - Restrict further development knickpoint of headward along ravine edges; in areas migration (currently RM .80 north of ravine any future out- -.90) and will move up- falls should be tighlined into stream with time. canyon or (preferably) routed around. P:BR.APC/mlm C-11 Trib. & Collect. Existing Anticipated Item River Mile Point Category Prop. Proj. Conditions and Problems Conditions and Problems Recommendations 48 0024 30, 31 Geology Channel downcutting, bank Increase in impervious area - Increase R/D, especially in upstream RM .20 erosion, landslides in on plateau will continue to area of Trib. 0024 (where most ravines. Natural instahi- aggravate erosion in the future development will occur). lity aggravated by ravines and cause deposition - The downstream analysis required by increased streamflows. in Garrison Creek. BALD for new developments should fully address the impacts of new developments on the conditions foun at this site during reconnaissance. New development that will aggravated conditions should be required . to include mitigation proposals prior to approval. 49 0024 30 Ilabitat Loss of pools and instream Any remaining fish, benthos, Reduce flow rates and volumes to RM .10- habitat from high-flow ero- or macrophytes will be lost nonerosive levels with development .30 sion. due to the high, erosive controls and/or with additional stream flows. R/D at existing sites. SO 0024 30 Habitat Urge quantity of garbage More garbage and increased -Encourage citizen project to clean RM .70 deposited in the stream. water quality problems. up the stream. -Large commercial area and parking lot runoff need oil and metals separation before discharge into the stream. • P:BR.APC/mlm C-13 EXHIBIT F SENSITIVE AREAS FOLIO 6052.002[BH/sm] er._''''.". '-"r.',.,V^i',V:•:•:-.'42-7-11,f;".. ' -1"'"•• 'Ir`..:...„:•-. -;.I.i:rtt,..y.;c7-.,X-s.:?::;";-:rickX.:37gi,;.. .-...n.. _ _ _..,..,_,. ,...,.... _...._._. . .... - . . . '....''''.0.''S•'. 2. --•••----- -...,----- •-----...^..w- , • • , . - . , - .. •,...,,-- ,....•,,,..r'-_-'-'7. • •,-• • ).. -• r ,‘ ..,' •.;--...:..r•-,c• :_st---'10- '.."' • , .N.;•••• ••'..".••-L.;-.'‘.•-•':-!-7:.•';'.",;•••'--.i'-';':':•%•-'!.-••• ••::"."-:-..,.."A:-.• '• • •• .4 ''..e' % :. ,r.' -., •,--'• - •'• \-------. ••• -- -.4.._ • 'e.,›•'•-•• P.:. k'‘.4 1:: : - .;:.,....,.....,...:,. :.: ....,,,,..•,...4.-.1,:.,...•,:. ....;.;,-;,:.-- -,.,..:••••,1•••.•.:„ ri- 1,. '-• °'&..' ).k.-›).--e"-V .•':'•:.4•'"::• 1--• . •-,•r''.? ----rr---, Metes91*lithri':: .1- ---•••/-1---:" A- ----- ;'. ••• c'`1 'i-,\.1i '''. :-..."::-.1.-.',.'‘•:-',.')•:::1':x.•':-••-•;:-:"-•.•:;::.••••:-..••:.•-•.,.•4:',1,' .• ' •21k1:3... ,i •,,I.,•,.;', ::.. ...', ..,..-_,-;1';:,.- ••(\‘--Ji L),.::•;,,- ;•.,. •-• -1._i',+: 1 'R,7-'"''''."........,:rk ',:.7.-2.1 .),, '-,.7. -9 i i-'i.11 .,-..:N''..".:,-;-•-i ,•.:","-i'.---:-,:t,;',...i-.-:•:,,.;7?:,..;.,•••;;;:'_.;.-.:••• <,1:.,-v..%-:."-• 113.hill 1 ?'.."(•••'.:i::.•-'-:--"•••'::!.`-7-'• • NI\--''"...'• 1 -`, ,f3,,,i+,,,,ity .; ,. ..\4,, --,.-,,.,..1.1 l ,. .•:,1 ...ii.,',...'.-...':".;•:;;;;;:,..,..i..;',',E;:::.::-„,„-:-.;•;'ff,..;,,,%:,. ..:-'..::: ;"7' ,1 -,.. .."ki--'.:•••.v::::".i;,...!..,::,',.:, . .->',--., ''. i:4: : • ,Ai • ',-- ..\ 1.. 1- coi . , ..._:,\VI i-` .1 • II. 4, '-"1.-:`...;'1,-7,-`,-.;--r,;--,,•:1-,r,..t.,-,-::-'<....:..-..e.,---.. %.-: t..... ".".-7-e-'-.,-;.:-'...',...:-';-s,..",':k:-,1" ....,...1,-,. -.-: - - i\< 1._„-*,.'- - . 1,ir Cr ..3 A. ... . • •,• -1 ' - : • • 11 I--,11 "-..';=;•.,,i....-•..-..".,;.•••‹..-.-;„'4..7•:-.., !...,;;'...!.:.;•- ".%.: ' if 1 t_._-:•-•••''',----- ..::i '-:'.1•.: •..f:','-``, -1.-:-;•-r,-,..i i:J.,•-•.2 : •,, .‘,...\\I--..)---1-1(,(j•• • •- -.,,,-- ,.c„'• r.... , \ 1,. .(4.,:z. ., 1 _i..m:,...;.,,,„•_,I,,,,.. ..-.:„-,..!„-:-,;:-.,....-.,;--; .::-..-;,;-..-.-A...-.......'-..,7.:.:. 's.., , ! - ,,---„,li i.1...IAN•-,--._-,.7.,%'...-:.'7:;','..,,:II N4 .-i. ' i -1_,A4 . .as' .1.,L."2:"e•d.4 • ..I 1.. ....::``..".-.".."-='.:;,;','-:',..."` '•..'."..P*:‘,4 14:., Ar •' . I .:"4.r...:.,-:,• , ....1,,-;-:",'',-,•• •,-i .. .---, . ' •,.:-4,,f. •:.• ,- .2( -- ' ,Zi •• -.-'( -:•''''''''''''.1.'f"'-••'"4.-.^"" ' '-'•-" :.•'.- 1. -;. -•.'4V'/`'ii,t;,. •4 4''''--11••--.. • .A .' : •-- .S.!'-''' • ..';'...''':'•L':''i Lt_ -..'Ti..',,...,,!;: .;.!- . 2,.. ;;- , ,.-• .2. . ,y::4:!,.,:.: ";41'CF,...•''. ;2,-- r,.; • ,.. i,„:,,!A -.....,-ssi--.--.7,7-..,:c • .„ i „ ,.:„ ,- S 111 •• iiidggni:-; , :::. 7 -...1 ‘,•?-.,--,..•••••-,...- • ... .•- 1 •;:•,-,-..,....•; ., •-.:•,=:-,..-•,..:..,..>-,...:-/- - -IF,\ -.-1,-; Ti;\ - -ti-•q_., --••-- . i -•.-----...:S. % :._;• ;',.! =liti!--1;i-•••• •,'•!, -.:'-,••••• : Iiili:-•`i••':•:--,•2•'-„.*• :. '.•• ' ..:.::-.,.3.1,i: ..-', .- •;:- .-.-..,...:".- • •••,4Eg!st._•-1 •,,-,s, L'i --, • - ... - -.:', •- -sa) ''',:-: ' .1:-•-':f i''•••r"Tirirdrait!el - :..--•-,•-.;j:;;;:'-'.,-->, •k`izj-...-..- .--t:...'"-..-..:/:-.:.''.--1"."..-....i'-i. ::!!•'.: . 7..7- ••:- --;-;-X-'•V"•::',•:',-;-,'•::•"?;'-"y; .;..-')'t•: _. 1:-..-T:::\.'I I '"\ 41-- .. " .•-.----,::,-1, . '• • . . • '•-••;.•-•• 1.• •' •:: ':' ..1.''::. ..•-'.•..: . 1 la 1.911J. 1211 1m13. i':;..•l'&'.;-?..:3.)t 71;;''':''';:':11''---:;''''''. ''cri."-. j:A c-''.' -.1 .1';‘••: :- ----- :- : • -,, --•:,,.. ---- -'1:7-111,_ :-:i--z••' , "•;•'•I-.•' -1,,-- ... • ••••• r.-:•:•,\--. . : .:.1-..,.F. " . ..• :, •'..a. eirsvngs .. i-"3;11,‘.;,. ,.---f.--_,_) .'A!..1"..1.-,..?-'::;;•••,-,•:..:fita.!'-•••''.,_: ,rsi, ,:.:. t.li',,t...:-'.........'---.:' •!:' •f.: • 'i 1-,.,.1: 1'r-- ••-• ' .-t-!..i"; .........----i . ZE1MoramEtii. -\ ,._,-- -..;::i-:.";?-...".”:•:".',C,"•.:',7•:,'.-,. . •:.;y•-."!.7'liAm■ ,..:\-*;•'-' -.5":''''''.-.:•:•.•J.'••••-f.•% (' L, : -•I'L,',.,..,C0E11 , .-- ...).1-, .,,,im"nil , . ....1 )-..-,-- -,:____.,..1'•:Lz--;-..7-;:,', ; 7 •- ' ' siims A :.',..:*;•:,.',•-•,m.,-.-4C • • .. ni...-: 1: ,,,i !(-_-• •; '.• --,,,,.......--- ----). .• .,./...,::;. m.. .•....., .. . .n. ;, ...wit ___,_.-,,L\....1 , ...-•.-•,:::,....:,;-,..i.,•-..:,:.--,-"„,.-..::•-.„::/ ' ‘ lft •„4...: • ••:•,-: :.:-.,.. --::::.:- k 1. ••Rake:-' i C 1 t..-i 11 •'•• L''''c- .----- --t-' •J'-'-r- -,:,••-•,.. , ..,...,s,• ,5za•-,..- a .....:Pri..1;;),r...... . ..5,...:,,,:,-•:.•:.•,,:•:,,-!,.---i ' ',•LI: ' -N-1....,-, • '..,--•••••.:-•:',.,',.•,. ; - •:A. 1,1___:•I -,• il-,--:-ri . .:.•,:s.v,,_. ... _.,.. .....'÷!-- '1.,,,!: ; • •.•.• k 0•' um ' ...,- •• ...,, j • , ,.,:....;;;'-';1,::';5_.-.: .4- .....--,-':;! -1.••''...-;''''.:;,,-,nr-1;.1:'il Fr 1 ---\-- ' .1"1-r•-•••' •• :••.,:-.7,".*.-•;;-;,i•-; .... -. ...S.... ill'Z.,'''Wariellialliell',',71.... •'.,,--•••-!,,..-•-,,.:,:-,,,,..1',‘.,..., •-•--...,,,, .,- • ' ;•-•,' ,-.1.-4,-' ,,... ---4:,--4 ',‘ Ill.ri: •••--:A,.).N•-•••:-:•.-- •':,,--,...-::::. • "-.1...1 1-.,14.1 ( ,•)1, .. 4!:. " 4'7:,..'":,, _•.,c....„. ‘:,...:.: • '., •:.t.,?,.:Thrz,K,,,,,Ammax-l' . •:- -.:'• •-2-...: ::-.•- '..-7,•.:. ..• :, PO.. . .vs: 'z'' ' --''',. .:.:. :' ••:1--,•'-. :-,E:.- --___,1 •• ?3,'" ____...,•_. ::::-..:," \ N\\, 4... ..:: '"4111:11=Viak. = ,•''• . -'7,i .5-'.' ._.- sli.E41 Ilrity;--::-:;E-,T6f-A ii (ii' T....„....-.7--.-;.- ;— \\ „,. ,. •••,,, .---4,....11:)•... .,:st1.41, .:-'2:.: '-'--,--•'_-.- .':: :!'..:-••••:: ..•Asp•-7;&-: `..1! -"' '-----."-- ;.A!".•‘ .' ' ":.'5Y'r j. ;:,,--&-"X`2:.%::;,;•':---'4i.,/'•:' - . ''''. .' -' ' ••••3.i. •' er !:•,-"'-"::-...•••• •7-.•.1.-....:;6r--illit- 0-n• . .........7. r... fa - .k-..:•-•:?-"--,--..--...•,-,,,-:4'.....„-,, •r......1 . r e - . . -Ciii,,,1... -:.-1-.::..t.:.!‘tAlli .:.r.':...4 i ,r .P.;-..,,,,,-1";.. .:::.'2:11,'-.-ii-'•'../...(.'..4. ':-7.4 it ' . .r:''l'''':::.:"' t" .4.— 1 ‘ • ' Ili .. --1: : . 3. . . ' • . - NV:- \r,\:.-•• ''''`'..--41i:'' ME .'.,:'...!'"."...•-:-,7',;•:-:. :',...;.....",,',..., •i i.. /.1 ,..7,1: •,:,,,...:'..-. ..:•.! ':‘•., [ __, -., •• „ . ..--,,,, .- • .- • i' • •, ..I.-7.; . 4,-, „a ,,,..„ aim 4-•-•.••'•,;%:.-.;"--••?-}4-.-:.c,k••gt•:.-'7‘i ,.---' LI • imam ,•)fr "•'-';',"----:- 751::, "• ; k.1 c"'-- • " -'\,-L'•.--'s . ' '''' -- . -I • •cr4 *-;,..:-.-1. VIE:tn.eiek •‘•:--,•••';'::1• 7• : .:..• %.*, , : -. .- 111.,.‘', T . • -"' •-k-.•--- :',..:k ' r 'l.,•.t, ....4_ P::-;' ,-4.;-1•:"...,-:_:,-„..c.,:;•.,-..". r,-.-.,...c• r.",:w-../'•:1 , -,...,..•,..: :.- ,'.1! •: .1: ) Ts . . ... . :. -.(, .....,% , .\,... .......j,. -•.•.;,:,-;•L--•••:,...„:••:-.."•: .,:•.•:-..f:,N,..-:,•-.':,,, -...•,'.r...„...0,,v, '••,-.."...•-••-, :-:. • f..:: :._ -...I‘,:-1 " I,ki,... .„-:,..,...:a.•,\ ir'..• ,,-.3.-•.?, aL. milliN • -.• \1,-, .:,. .-::::::-.:i••-:'..f.-,,-,,--;.:.'.,-••••;,:--,-;2',,-.:','' ".* ., '..,. ...:r''\• '. ',,, . .1 . „. ) . ,.... •---- C 1 .: '' -: •--.<•-:, - ,J.;„ &1'. 1 .„'!, (I's.. ;.,-5/41341 IiiiirAtIV-., ....,',:',: -,..:, '._:' ;',.." .,, '3.-11:, 1 ;,('--. . " 2:::.'• "AV. .; .. :'. ..-..',. - .•:,9,:•. . -- .11 : •-, .' • .. N......:,...,,-.... .,!:... ... , .::-.11. .: -",.... :1 t. ... ... - ni",.;... .:-...f'-",:•:;.."/; -':•-:' ••••.."::: •f`.• V. ''': ' . ,.-:•. , ''- , . i - '• •'• -,,'-. ..., Altilikei C.-: '74 j,• ':-.."....,,r,,;,-.:q-..,::...,.:',:..,•-•,.., ',....., • ........ .-.• .. 4,1,A, -, ,i'' ,.. rr• ;-`,---,-,-(C.\,\?•- ) 1 • \ : .. -=. - 1(•,,,- .IcimrAw.."" '.. ;•;-,;'•-:.;•;•. -..-•'•---.-',••'•-•:,,...-...•;.-„•,..:. ... . ••.•: •'•:: --,,-....... ,. ••.--:-..-,'\,. --N. „....,., --••-.•: •7• ..- - .-..Z.,,, .- ' (.., • i 28b • ..: "..,-•:•-• ...- •••• ••••• •`,. ,-..411.1?.. l•-•?-i I- 1,trjmir6 "\;•:..,'-:,..4.e.•-","--..:-...; •,,.''.- --•• - • •• •--;.*::. '19= --- it.„7-..-.. .:,-•--: ...,-.-.., •,-• - -..' - '''"'''''. '.. . • ' •... .' r.••'.2. ..;'.. + • .....Irj:'‘ '...;,':.- 'I ,•-trbliiifeJth. ;),.-"r-.171.4'..1"..;',.."-•-"--.'%., . ---, , .'. -••••• . .-,,, ,.. - .11.14...7f .-(7.' -.-..,-• .."::.--%-i;It i•'.: '.i7,"1117, , ..?"...if , ..\:,...:--'.,-• -. -,:......• ......: - -•''.....2...,-,,:. -';11111•:-.---7: •'• ','-t.•----,(--.:' - -.••• ,- - . \0 . :-.- 1 ,,,t.,:.;ii.....ti z .. - ,% ,•'!•:i..:,'`1\,,..,,,,,.- .; ' _.', •„„..:.:,;:.',.: t;'1 t,•'. • ! .-'.. .- '• .', 7" 1 ...-f-'•r`. • • " • - • •: '4. .':---:.;•••.!,•:;,, • ,\. ,::-'7-.7.',,; ,..:'' -.•.'-'•'..: ....:',.'''...-): !N14 --::,..- ..77...; fals.•:-•.;',, ,.. z:',..":•...,1- ,-..., . .:•-• ....,,I.•:,:,':.,.:.trit. :!:,:,..._ :,.. ', .->„:1:-7.. ir;r3:-:•:..ii:,•::.1,-:.iej.: -..•. •,-...-..---; . • .\: \ '-',--:---.-Y./ 1 ""'•0.•.. - .. :-,\‘.. •.;;.-;•,,::e. •••,...:-..;-•'filis‘, ...'". :,.:,,,,'"-::-..-.-••• .-:.- 'i ' •:-.•,-".-;..: ,.:s.,• :'-'I:j.,.::::-': 1_----:,'.',A,.''. \.\ •um=•-. . -... ,••• • 1 i, N•••;,-1,--.';:, :.. "M, 1 :.44::-:. •:sc.-. ,''''''&Nilli .•:,..,•:.:-.. ‘...': .:-.::•'2'-'... , :li:,-7.-s ...1..`, . ''•• • '._ 7'--- 4,4 - : P".I•.' '.2--, ......-1- , 4- t --• . 1 -• ,..:. ''.' ...,';*;,:. T.:4 L's-':•"--•''.. --. ''......:;:.• -'ll; ....•ve/,-)‘'( z-g--:-•1,..'•-.,',.;.kg ..,s' '::.:.'. -"-•:f.::..'---!",:..•-••I•4'..--...'• -7:.::::::4;-::::, ....4 III.-:..i i;.•:',i• .•..-• .• . .- :-.. -,- , i 004 ':t .'„. , u.,,,, ' •:: -, ;,..: ass4 gtort•..-•.• .-t:-‘., - ,,,- ', . ;• .• • ...,..f .•,•!• ',=t-•-.F.:,•,:•. '•:',4-4-. !......-,,t,_ ,. "tr!"'..",.. ,.).\. , 1 -..:• -.. - .-.• ' ..--• .‘.. .,.. ', ,. . -••. - ---,.:._ -,••,.:.4. • 1,..i. •••••• vl--• ZEIlik-v.-- ".".----y! •."7,.,•,•--"• ••• -1. -- • - . ••',1-- • ' liiiiva"-' . •/••'I-,-1'.7-•-•" -"-;,--- '--:-.--.E7-•• 's•'-';--r--' ..• :,. -. •"'" .• ' • •.•--;.•:-— . '•. •', -mail,1 !,-' : ,"--",?•-•<;I''-.,-• ••• ••• • ..1:.•-•:-••••••:1641. --- •cra =•., 1., • -r.m.44,0 ! ••,,\;,,,,",..:,.-.1:.,.:.• .. :.:..7„.,.#.•,.•.771' is,,... nro-,1 ••• , ,.... '-,-.,.)....'••_, ,• A'.,'iznit. ••• ' F—R ••• - NN . ' :/1—“.1. . '''. -- '''.4"' \'*\'44µ.1::' • • . . ''''•''. • •"s r.-- f• -,7- .•• 7. ._: ai71.5-rni.•,-,.... r. , g ,,,, •',,:•::.:•. 71-..2P:-'• it ,., _,,>,,..._ :., • -. , , tiir .-_k.\..k........i...c.... • . ,...-j-g-,,,.... . :i it ..-. „NI . ',,. '.•,.- A . ; • '"-- 7'.t :' Ns"-r".` ,')- . ..4 1.' nif-,!t_i‘i_li,•"‘ . . :' . II ! t2S`.• - •iiiiiilk.\- ' '-2,'''';':" c.:'•-•:',!4.°.; . ' 1411iii‘ -- °'---r7-'-'• ''''-'-:-.:. 4•••• '"' 1-• -- .11 :'.. I - i - - ---, . . ,,, • ,: ' ...,-, ......, ...,..- ., .., ..:... . • r-, • . ... .. .. .. e.,..i z.•I,-• ,-..._, •-...i-littr,is ../,'.i IL,' 1'1' -:.'s'..••••..'', .•••:',".":-,,..,,'-',.. ...AI.'---1- ,•L i ••:: ' .; Illik2.;;51k, : ,:?;:":..'1'.'...Y.:11---A-.-. .s 'I I'' •••11.•'..k .'•••"':::.•... :rtlyi. 0••:. . -•.• • .L4- •1.-. L ..G.=••, • 0..,..,.n.,,, .. : ....7.• .... ',. ..,-.-.-. gkb, • .s.:_s I,. ;. . .i._.,. ' n i 1-''"` I -'. ,' .••.: !..'' • ''...' ' ,-,h• ILI '• ,1... •4.,,,- -....,, ., :„..„...-,.., ..:..., ; .....„ ,ism :,,,,.,II: ,-:: ,i!,..: inerv.:,/, ...•::,...,.-,,,. .........':-.-.L ''s!.. -,4 -•-7 ,•-• • •-43•.::•,••-.,\ •,-,,.:•.t.,* rQr,, , :isi.÷.i. ,...,:i..--_,. ,..irle '4 •••CEDA •••-••••=--....•- ; - : j 7:-....•.•- • .,. •-•Li*). ' - • .RANE.: . '. ..,1; ,,iota :::. (,,..;•.., , o. - ... . 1 „,. 1 . , ., ,. ... 6_ 1..--4,..... - ••...;....-:,•!...1$ , , ... . _ Iv,t,•-•,,_ ..;..,_.....1.----;,.....:•-• . '-- ,, • -- • .• rit,-'. .Y11: ii%11,1 ' A 7.-r-.7 1 X.,'-- :•''':•;,1';.f.1.,' .' --.T1 .-;;61i E.i.:11(:1:;,: ''.: -.'.11163134";"ii•il.,--..-2-.-.7.4!7'-'?:---...••--:,.4%'-', -,•--,' - "j. :. .:.• ' 1 •11. • t:). ',,, •-.1 - Ili 4A.. " -•-.%'''17-:."• \1-ritttp),e, ' V. -; Ina . :114‘,0,;--4•1;'''V,..'- ' - Locareteedar$ a - • •' '1-"/"" r. ••'ii0.1k.11 se '" • a ''- ' - - vi.• -op ':-"',' ",--..--itt-:•".'• ""."--:'.'' _..,..,-...•-.,---:,k . •.1.,..--..."..-".. •,, 1)7. il;•:111'.,. 7.- WM"..;.'.1,‘: • 4.,- ...t.'-'!"..-1- .• "1- _ •- ••••;\ .1' ,....,A .,,,,,... .. • --,,,,,,2.„_-•.,'1,•,-.•....fx,--•, . _. . .. iffilp ! •i. .;.,-•,. ,--,-• ....._.. .., .r., .. . .„,,,c,,i, t.1-r-f_it_ 1 c 1,....mmormiuM.L....... .t.:. .. %,11p• ;11 l ., _. ti,:11. , .. ". . . 1i ; .T. ri , i,.......:...ttio ..;.41101,-'i::. ...:2,-......-..•..,._•,.. ,•;;:.:,:..K,.f.IX,:‘,...L.',..•.1.1...-.._.. .,-....,.s.,..k..... •,d....,....7..._..: /-1: • • TI‘ & , i • 1. ; ! ‘ .:.. ...Mang" \.114:1,N I•.4...4Se. )i :r.,"'" ! 1 17, -:71 .-•' t ,_am-1mi= ... .„.. :::,,-.....„11 .1 r• .,.':.- 4: ; ' .,-IMMII=IMISE110 ill'iltTr,.: i'....9.H.rz.,,.. .•:'...;. . !.....!:. ' ....ill.iiiii110.4... .. 1./. .., r ..,..,. -",..'i'. . - ,..;•••-*let • . •r 571t, -,•,.. -- • --i---14,-,-- .k:. "` /----Lai'6111ri.'iieelditii:- ( v V;. • '',. - ir -, •-• !.....--' --"- -., • .."- -- 7 11111VON, - _- .... . ? . ..i. .„ . % '.:::'..,-t • ... ..,...rit,lek-•=• • •• • .. --, .. 1-...... mara,..:118,.',..,„ - . . . • l :.j.. .'1,;- ''' (dinommo•r--'3 -!, I:7- .2;-'--." -;-.•. Ito tri-'• • •• • ft .. .._.' %Noir - • .. ••• - .,:: .. - z -:, •Rl e I pi i ... .-- ..- '" •:--"C-\ ilk . - - ''''" " ' .---...TO - f'111%."-' lid -;-%:* I" Z.,, 1 •MEI .1 i.''' \ . .PIRIMU-niVillgsz,• via. •,;"..... -= ?„.111Fir wow • .• Eni • . i.,.....:.. .- nuinft. 4i - • - 6- vE1-4.4 -.3 - : i• , ..„...:-.-..2; [Ili 11111911KENEME • ' k ---, 'i L.' '',%'4 \tigh,--'111 .I ' ': ' - 1%, 41 \ C-lirCil a • : g * • 1 .,-zamilan11111WEIMME ,1; :-.1 ---' ..:.-,;'''.A . 77 ' 2R .' /,'.' .,','I • i!AFIIIIMILINtaiit. 1 2tj--::;. . 61:i,r ' ') i 1.— .Ic '',,':...._ ,. _ . 1 : :71.. . '1 ,- ;.. . go., ti, i j 1r •• . ..,\• li iviliglimendo, l'. _•-•,..., .! .1- .--- i ' - ,-'', • • •Lir : aszerroi 4r• • . -..2 leril, ..,. . ., . .treiC1 , :i •). • •A,r; 4 .....•••.. •• • '•MI 1 4 / 114T - •, • • . ZN,,' -‘, -' tt msfir.ft. ..k : • .... :: • , ;--7-- , r A..,• .. . ••.-• -..:7‘. .. f- , f ., ,f, ..A., : ' ".....•• ,., . , ..,. . . , i .7. ' '' • Duwamish etiands. uxcept those with an Wetlands "b" designation are included in the Wetlands ms..._ County Wetlands Inventory. The n11 Open Water 2 7 13 ---) •ns of wetlands designated "a" have N i. ita. .1 :_c ..urilied on the site by a variety of 41 /A. Wetlands designated "b"are maP- inislem Basin Bc•undaries rbi4:'"i'- / the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service I , a,1 10 ei Weiland.: inventory,but their loca-•.ive not been field verified. Sub-basin Boundaries I-16' 1Z za___1__, r• .. •-• •i ric i II ,/1•• n,i ill hnri TM SC- . . • r . ... „..••••:,•.7..,:i'•;,•-••+::,..i•_•',.,.....,•••......;.•,:-.,,•••••,.7..,zu.'..., ,,,,-,: .•„;:.:;:•;....,;.;:,41..i...L..1.':14"s'.•:•.1....,..1,_::3.•'.'..,,....t1:_-_,-fl-...-.4:-.;:.:A..-:.':,.r.:,:,;:k:,,:.:-.:;.:,..:;..1;:-...,-;;;.:L....'..•••••‘......:•-. •:2-:-....,:- .*•':.:-..2f...,,:•-•:•••:-1:-. •...7:. •" •--,..-•-•...:.,.......-..-: -...-• .. ,,, . r• ...1.•.% -.0--7-7-,---------‘....c .f• 1 )11 1-1-L.., .• gl it : .2.Sr- -1 i 17'.-1-i. 7.1-1. `c.,,----4-. •. •-rl -1-.•r.I.L. -,. 1 ,t)r, , ,/1„;_.1-___Hr-i i.,\.).4-1 :11....i...3.,/,;,,,.__---............7...,..:____Jsill i ,..r.j„,fr, .::ii•.: •••••••.. 0, 4-Li..11, '!.• : • '-.,,"•..-' •r-',:'11,.• .. I. -----• '-•.....i 1'4..,ts.; . ---j-..v.r..t.1---,-,.....k, ''''.--:'-'"..._:'••••"7-..-_,A'. •-•,0--..r21-irjet•-•• riT- • • - •!•..,... '.I. ••,•,..,1.,: 1/:'-f . i---tr. I.'"', Lot •-771- ,-,.:t. ''., !•.::...: r.1 ,...,* ,1, :. 7,' , .....? 4 rir I.,.. ,4,-;••,- t,ft t. .4 tt,-,-.c.4•11. •-. ...,,,...-,4''..-;rri; ',-11.-- ,-• .4---,.• , , . ...- - ----/ '' '.."' v." -'11.,1" •iA '.4.,••••1 , ,-- t.. -.fl:i4,-,i..,j_j-i . )--Li-1- ...., p,,..l_i_._i__„..., ...:„.....,,./. ../..' ', , t I j..ii ....,(I tip I --ly-i-,•_, •ifr,Li kj Y'.-.•i'---- , . (N. . .. 1 ' l--`l •'• ‘..‘; i t l-•' " ...5-. ...._ i •... . ,..--:..--- ./ \ \1 I.. ,,,1 • ---I'C-:"..--112`..---1/4<.- . .-. -• l' i- ' 1 '.\' .. -•' .'l• fik)s-4--- ;•-:....r':-.3:1 ;_y; 1,441_..--tA '• '• •p....:.i.,,s_7.1..2 4 J,__Li. ..i5'..... , . 2 , ,,-.7 •‘, 1 /----1) \,...."If/'•4.--'2-.t.t tie-- :r1":•--1-1.1.1'.:- V:' , /-1 x •-1", s ---1../I ...cc. i:.„.„,_../. . i l::_)..,---, • 3 ---'• 11:"- *`••-• !C.,- .1..: : •• ,_.__ , 11........ ).., . '...,11-: .i.1 tiff;\--jc.._C-i-.•:_!../ .• littlilt • ;-. .', / •:4 4:--T/k-',•r I IL/ ,,:./1-:•. //....' •'.\i•- '\•\•.'''' .•--\5\" .:\.,2'11/ .• .:•- -•', . -: .-.., . -':' .4 ••• ' • •' Y\'•t1-- . \yrte.:-.)7 ..-i-•.''). -/:-' ..../.17:77.•:''; iiis•I. ,1,‘, „ t2-3.---, ,, l'k, ..)... ..-•-..__':- c.....c-,-.--.71,71_,. --• - ,...,,,--r-i--1-„,if-i-t• ...• 1 •• ., :•,.•..-1. „.;.1(sx..„:. .‘ L..I 1 I. _ 1• i.I:.7.4.• • ;_,•-• •.f. '.i'U: '/1.7".--1-,:;.--\-'. ,_ / ,..,'1 ' -,....1 1, I 1\--.1 • 4 ' e..r."--- '',l c.'', ,' V'\•, ..„' -.1--- 1 • ,_,•\,,,t„,,i , --,;--,7.: •-•,,i . -,.:' , -.11;;-7-J' -1-'\1,,,-I!\•:I •r- --O....II:::‘•'.' .- I•: :r,4 4: •.i_I''1' -•,-1-),:I.4:.s: . . . 1'. '1'1‘ 1 I 1-.-1 I I'"'I •1 V .•-• \ i 1'X.,/ / "/ - 1`-/-'.. .-•:•--:.•I..• :'• ' ::-r\-2,cilt_ • _.4,--,- • :•••••4:. ..W., • 172- • ;. 7.7 11'.1. k: ‘-.'l I-1•.'S•••k.... If• 1' --"`-`---••••'-.,"...) `.1.--..(.. ' 1 1 I / .--4•::-I'-r-1::-:• II • ‘'......: '...1....7'_....,.1 1.__ ... 1-',-<-:-.7,;;;_ ••, :'.'.'----. . • :- - 1 '..1 ) _ . .. r-A''.'4,-.. ' r•'--- , , .4 1/1-'4 „. • l' H 1, , i 1/,..„. , .3 .. ..r. (,... iv ".t• -,..r-. ki :. • ' r.::.-..!,.:1.'..., • -- ..,..,.. , I . .., L , , -- _,,),.x.„-_-:4-,::,... ..,-/‘.---1-•' ‘ ... I r-,-1.14.i). , s',-- .. --,- - ' t•- - "• '-•cl--....-.:-.,--.:i • ,- .__••_. ''-' • N _ ,,_ .... . ( t.;-(.1-:. r• • )7‘..7..72,-,`A. -k.1.7" . .'k,-.zt: -.,. - i , . '., 4 • ,...., --j's.,!•.!• -/-:3-.'-^• -7'• 1 I• .1 ..x.:1: '44., ,1.___ i•.": ' .r- • •. '-:':-".7...,.i----14.'`.. :;',,_.:., -:.1[,__.. .1.t. ,i, : 1...I.. r „•-, .., , , /-::•,.."7.---LH:L-;7--___-__.';-. --•• - ,,.‘ 1,1, t 1-•,--! ,_.,s , -*-.,''''..5:1..'l\'`4--t.1-1-....:. .-.-:-1,4-1;:. . -,1,.,/l i • . . . 1 14 • 'q •'' -•-•',. : :,'. .../-- ,,LC 1 l.1 -.L-2:1,\_i,„.! .1--"•-• - - '.- '<sv \ ...i-'l'r'j!'- •'..”:LA.:: ' .,,,...• I? I \ • . . . .' . •\,r.)1 W ..-- `../.., ••-•• • ... . - ),17:?..q.-..-'1 .-." 'I-s-rAY \.. •••• .-,k,..„,„ ..1:,-4, i --,• - ,,.. , A:. ,.. .A. .,.:. i.,..• _•._r t .1../-'j.,' .,1 . •:...;.'"ili.-::.,.'-.;'......... - '. ,-,--;..- 1"- .• ••. \ . 1 •t-'. ). ''' •• - 1 ..--, ----•• di '.''. .1.' .,\'1/ ' ...."'i!c"--1. •7(. .'' .*2 'i • • • [ -(-- .••., ,,.,....\ •\ (-1-...='-'t"." , • ' r., A"1 '.....f..._. -1\. ,`- • \-- ---..--,.‘ , .4. . . , „ .,. , . -‘_Nt..: ,Ly.,.../ • 1 L":4'....Z-..,.'r.'....i, , 'TT.:.,iiv. ''7'_ ,-. • °.:;'. Y ,.4 1-':. 1, p, ; , .. t A\ -i•Ilft.,, • '''''• ''.. ,._,=.,1\s.'s ,--; •- •i-..-:.;'-:••.rt,.,-t;- •,-,-• ,i-t-•'12,k ..,.. .... -,- • • •., •---.-- .• L.,•i-.---.;4'.-:••• ,.14 ....it .,, • .,.,.,•.•,\ • k ' •\,.1/,..,•y t.:::.;,' • •••:,.., •: '.1. ‘ \ '•-• ' •i ' ., \ . .. . • ' ••;:i:. ;/.•, '..n -1-•,, , , „... , .. ..,........„N .• r :1-A-- -E -. 1.)v. t / •, s., : ..' f:'(• ' ..1 .1 ..:. •"\..L.. le• -• -•• . I.' ''•• Yr':--- . :.. :1..„.1 .3. .t \,-0C\t• '1 ' ••!'" l' 0 • 7•\,:Lr :i., .•,--'.•-: 3.1'.:.-: .'•-, -:..... ..si 3' •.-. .,.:71„.;1.,,:...:,i1, 1-,;,•-' / t .-. , . ... ...• •,•/ - .„,../ .1 A\ •I . 'X.,,_.... • 'f.' ‘1 • ' • ‘. r . • "' 'r-t7":"yofit ; ---- ‘:""- •-- f.- •7. ;v, , •L---1 .. • • ' - '-.-..A=,/ 1,•,_ ,,-..1..).„it..:1;‘...i.-...,,'ZA:i„,,,s314'silln IN;... • I. • - • . - .. t...._ .-, -- -: - . -------- -... -• . • I . . IA,.:-.71-h. 1. '.', •`....7' • Mint ili; - . , . • • , • . , •• ,. . , . v_.... ..., .T,. . .... •S71_,- , ,y-....,_\_. .. \ ..!,-7..• ', .,...:,),•••-:5-- . ''•.„'''•••••,, ,- --\ 1 ___ i• ' -..,-3 Li-. -,4,,,k111‘• ..• i ( 1. r•' ..:1.: ''. ...:' •-•:•'•'-'• •••'1' k'' ),lb 1 • •-,:r.'1. •:•••'.•••.•:! 1"---7;',•,\I. \1 .4--•_-----.,---1' 11••-',-- --• tNI; `"Z.•'• •-c,„:::::-." ..., ..-„,-....4....-, •,•,.,;„,„; . . ..r.- •••,;-.4,,..... a---- ..j...••;,' .....1.'.-,,/;.•,7•,',.'.-,',,,.•,1'' /1111/4,!.:,...").--.2.::'7....3--•.•::7_:-.:,.,-1L,:c-•4.,::...t..:',7.,.i..-L-.-'.•::..:.i,",,'.,•,.4,;.,.-.:4.--1;i1..7....-;V1t:4,.„t-,;f.'.„.•1,6;i:.;:,'V•'':..A1i.1 0ll1i1n .. ,.A...rrit:,I.:• .:..t :,:.;.. \v•••\f;2t'•:••,,;,;,•. .•7 1 , 4' 4,U1, Ni:/.:'..4•i t-t...-'';'''i'i-•.-\,„A. .1'71i7--.-7}4.-,.-'t,---,--•1-,.7:-n...,_-2_:2•-r.,_1•••• •.;!/.. .. 1-1.• '.•4;t-.. 1.;; ....;-..lir.:.".-'--2,.1•1•:,•-,•.•.,'._-,„•-•',:,._, .,:• --", 1...t,v••••••••.4, •- ••::,.-•••-:-•-...' r,,;.- '•,,4,- •,,,'-:•..•::•„!.-4',•;••-•4,;;;1•,.:';',.‘,.:,,- ::.•-• '; '0\.t.,'''....(,_'4.‘••;:-.,41.---.. ,•.,,,...-..-7 .-;,--,,,,- z--7.).7-- :..:....-..,-; .---,.•,..'.-,. .1f,,,i ..,..__ . ,•••• . ./ . -,"•-,...,,k, .•=, •„i:',. ••'••• . - ---- "pi:44,u,-..• -,.. ... : _,,s4..A-4 • ••-•' 1/.-N).:,'" • '.. ."'. '..IP' .11;• • • ,. ,- 'an.1i, ' .... .,. t-L__:,\,._....11,-, ., .....:.- • ...::-. ': ,- r. r,---.-_ -...22- !,.. .,t._:7 :,-:-7- -., -..'''''''',..(.. •' ''\13.-. T ... .4i1014.i•-•••41.....: , 1 1 .--• 1.--:::_-------r N:;.-,.., ,,.tc„ - - - ., 'Y'-'1.i 1:`- 1--: -,..•*,..1•.;r111 f\;..-...-1, i-tr-7-i- l''' A•' ..a'• '0‘ • ''''--:-..151 '1'. 1 1 1...1..: •••.--------r i.' 1 .-1 1,1...,, 1 -',....,'. ......, , '...ir.......-.......•..;.-___-.,=.- •,.....L_r-% ..,.••••! V.•-•' : ;.1::-.----J-" I: \s',..--- 1!.; La. -,;.- ••1:.'--41."-71 d'-'7.4. %--:-L.•:, ° ---7 ::::1't• •-r" \ '''-::-.1:' 1 ---1 • I/ • '1 ' '4 1.- ,'-.: ! \r•- ,.:4:---.--- •-‘.. 4t.-- . ..,. .4. .., •-':fit f:.".':1 ',....•'''.''''.•---,-...7"'"---- -----1-71. •1-.. kN .t:: -_ _ _;-----3 : 't t :, • . • /\:- „.,-.t : . .,1 .s t : .., ' * \1 1•-' ' \ -•-i-g;•-'-/-:,-x.•/..‘ • ....-- ; !...i:•, ..,...‘ .1i--i-•:.,-1- -41-....;;•--:,. , '...,;..--.-11t.,1, ,.,.../ - •••\•,k•'..' ,:-...:•.,.,/-.,...1,1 1--,_ -_:__'--:12.1.1_,-...r]'.---i, i i I- ., :... • ‘,..,.. ./.__ .,.• ,. ;I -.Lki.,-..\,..,.., •,., . , ,,. .)....v.. 1 pt-lit;.._:;-..-L-.:7; -, - -• '---- 1 '--1; • Ippi lilkid '' • :..i...•Ai- L .:2----1-- ‘ F1 • t i.i ....:f.r.• 1;-:. k-, ' ' .-• v.'% . ,•- .--..-,••,. - ',/'..;"?.1-',.1„; -- L t•-• •••• \ .7 --1-1,1 ..;- -,•?.."-,... :- ..)A.-.:. ..- 1,•? ... -.,_\.••-___ ..J.I_L.__._ F' ____.• ....11,____ •Li .! ..., ••.,,,,,-,•• .----,;„-=------7-..cr -°- •1 1 .1- . I 1 l'• •-•-• .i +I 1 '.----.." .., . '-',.:•,' • ..: ' ' .+_ 1 -1 i A 1 l'.•. 1174-1?"4:4 '''' ' 4111' . ''.3".::.,..'''''-".:.. .k,c....-----7.7,-;--7-...7!Tr-I. 1---P7 ....5, - t.--','.• ,, .....,• ./ , .• - -.,-• ...,.. "- • •. _. 1 bk..„. ., .• • • .. •••• -- . . 1-- , • 'I \s,1 .:_l• ....- 1 ' •' 1 ---,, ,Hi --1- 1- ,• ..., . ,, .. ..1.1-1,:ii._ 11)140-,-• • - • • • -'' ---s-f_\‘•.•-,. . ..7.'..-.TO- ••^\ .- '^•,• '...". : „:,.. ,...-;7 •••.". ••,•:•:-'--:. ..ty:-..z--. :ti•--; &42 I '1'4 ....-1:.--•:',..:":"r-, •••••-••' '•••'-vi .1-7 i 147-c ,I........., •, . . .•:•-: r r.; ,I. •••••.---4. -r :----)--- .- ...--: ..c-,4f...;,-f 4-.1..)4,---'••. • .--4,-;...;:. -., '. r-tr-i. •,-.•:-,••••-•:----,..,;:•.. • '--• ' ..-..il 1..... 1 '.-.1‘.:r--4-----i-' ' : - 1 i. -•-.•:•••7--• A...r.--.. ; , .,.,;=.1 •-S-,,,,,, ,• . ..---•••--'--.-"`N.'•.•1'7..!•••,.--,t•----'=-1.:-,-4-1...-.J.-L-- -• •••••.1.-- , ‘..‘1•`,,. ..-.....c,..---" .:•_- •• 4---:-7"c---;:rurri--1•',--:' , 1-- , , ...,-) 5,.i i 1-'41-.-4.11.::.•:/\‘‘1/;:f"-P...f.1.‘ • 1":-.(11=-17t_i' -17t,-/-37-••1, *.\:- . / '• . "X..,".'•. . ... • . .. ''' --/ •'31'.:i-1-4"7 •4 : " -7.1 :-. ' .. (- ''-rt).\--Z' i 17. --{Jr- I r. i-,',-; !' ••-•• .t•.i..- - ri . • • -• - --t- . . ''•-• .1• 1,)i i. •,•.'-'.`"-''';'1-"``' •----''','--. :-p: i'•-•:-.' -17••• ' 1- L •-'.t 1:r.r---••f 17 - .-\ ‘• ..._,..-:- .., 7 'XIi•••1, •:: ' , .. '''s 2- .. ...111 •-.'--6:. \ -__.tr,, ., , s _. ••'-`,"'?..A.,....A.?!-•,..,,,_-.-...... ---,,, ,.. ,-.,,,,,•:---.---•-7' ,,....• , „A. i -). •,. • tr,, .,--i--.,.. 1,-,,,:i, ...• --'-'' . • ••• - -• • -."1 . ' •:::- -'•• \• -%. . ' I 1 :• - -'.4:.- i..•)- 1 ' -' .. ?".--. \; ' ‘....:--,;•-• ,..4.7 •• . -. ..t.i, ' 1 L. ."..---4,.--7- I - •i N. \ -- z' -:.•7, <fil‘\:_::::_,..),.- re?'..•:,.- 444 •,-.-,,-,,.'7,-,,,_._ • . • .• • • ••:.„...1.-, •,.....„-. ..... , ••• . -, ,-,-7....._....,-- IL r.-'---;-:-." 4-,, . •k ; t • "... .• • •-• ,_:••••,' ... •-,....., --,,, .......•-•...,:.•••;f.i.r:: '-------:-____-••• . -., • tcra;,-,:-:•••••••,---, -i..•.-,.r , J1.- :: '1,.,jipsx- ,.. - F k-. '-', . '' N .r'' -' ••-• Nts • .) . .„,,,,--," • .al . •• ••,., '..-• t ; '\ -:- L5.-- r•' ,-;.:..(1.4 I z. I i. 1 - r • • •••••..- •r•q--•..., V - • --. ---".i - •..;\:1.-1,',-. :••t \-,* 4---kii-- ' . s . i \._.y.' :....%\,,, •'' l . • •cr`i,--, ""x....- . i,__ ___: --zr•- .'s) ". .. ir----ii .,...-t,,,.•., •t -, i•L ,1 Y -.i •- - -')75,----,--,---,• .f.,:ja,,,..k:‘: \‘-`, -"..*:•-_-•,...!...•___' ' '•.. si l . -'rta. 1 11, '",,f', ' , ,----kt_•,,,- _LI ir_. \r----:---....,:-___-_ ,,,„2.,.._ : ,, _ „ . ,. ti. .., •--•,__.--r,-.L_-• - • 1.--; i •-• :•.:1 .,,-.-.L .i‘ . --; • ••••••.; ., '4,.. •-=.- '(...,_:,._ -1;..i •••,--.71-. • ,.•,.; 1 --1 •• ,-, .-.••: _A-, -31Y. .-1-11-7. .. i .___:.., , , , • ..;F•:• 2.. ...........:,s'I• . ; .-L r-1,-,It•..... .•,',-..),••••-.2'; _I_.,___L„ ., ,...-• %,...; ;,... 4 \.1 . .13 it \ :-..-....r-,;_.7„,- 7,-' ' --- .;. • ...,I , .- 4th/ -,• • ' filt, '. 46.. •••••• .. . ..... . ... ... -77r`:- -.-• •' • • .1. •r:• '•I 1"-•-ii;o: .4-__-_=_Li L ..... i• +4 .• ,i-;' • . • '1A4 -V ii'l--- i •: ' ss s 1 • 4__ :‘ , . ,./%•• •• \ .• . / 411• -.. ,,...- '. ,, , -, •• •(. . 1 --).< . - 71-'-' : V_.:-_1=,-t- ,\1.....c_\)_> ••••• 4 i ' 1, ' .• • ..., , .• ., ,, 1 1-'1.. , .,-2.,,,,, . , • • ,- ., .•,:,-75 - „.1,- •r.i.,..-..-- . -1 . . ..,•;•. ... + it-.1 ;' •-_.1.• :', . ;---- \ ••• i 1, i , • • ----' • .,t k--.-: %1 'r*:-.-- \--t--17 *.'" 3-.7-2-t'l.'-t- • I r->;:i,•• ,--( "-r . ••••. •.: ...,.. ..____ , ‘1 I 7 l•I. ' , ..44 N-••••-.•,---Ii • ir. J i' ''"•, \ .. : '''‘ - , •• '. -1'---T1-' •- •\ , .7,;', ..,,i. •.,', . ,.. • / %''1: ?IN--4 --.......:-.--L--.4...----•-.‘,• .4....... .14,4.....,11. • • 1 - -', '1 t,. _ • .. ... _. _.. .. .- • --- 1=11111M1MMI Class 1 Duwarnish 4 floodplains extend be- Streams and 100- ._._._._. Class 2(with salmonids) N on maps. Flood In- ,•2.:i.-7 7i31 • do not always show the - Class 2(perennial;salmonid headwaters of streams. Year Floodplam. s use undetermined) , 9 14 ,,,' Class 3 10 l' • , 1' y_ • '� _, '•.� ma' I• .^ '� _ - ,'!�•�� �.T, _ + -z'1+.:;_ 020 • ...__ �ryp:■y •':/ ,Eris' '4' � � . _ :1:. _ _ �•{,�Y1. . • � _ i! , :�!'-w�:��I L •:re.� : • '•YYPa"A� h'''r�'� Le�.'••1t• '<. 7 ' _! ' v • • ^ �17.. r. is .f I+ -T JA _ • _ it - -1 ' ����.� -ir.. .''' I; �' v'I .✓ 'K'� /r. Y,',1�', .,:}�� , .f•' '—�f r-�A+ - .i, _ .;-�. <'`,.: zys t''• ,Vic•.• :•1 ,, -- ... _ , .. : , •! , L (g) I }�' =: f r' '1 I F j�....� g\,'r ���r /aP�•',. .1'•��'.^� + 1,-: • . • - C 3- ,' , w T TT ---r-'-- - - r : it--r••. .�' l ! - i„1. •'I I_I 1 1 t'r ,•\ .. r( '-- `- I �,J•-'.. ;'_`\ l_ �...-(: .1 I'•r-, • • __ ]-ram T 'l•7X'7 ,�y .._ � - -C • \'• 1r _ • • • .!.. 'fti. t�:r�. �•: ,_ ,t -_{- - 1 -,�i' -.__}.. ( �-:.1 ._,,j .-:i•i_ ,• 'I�. :�:_ , ,�" -y+•,,:. _ C, ..�' ,J ,i• ':y..t�f �'^J �=��k'- f ••'� i`: T i - 1 17- I 1 I___.! 1 (' {ta/: r - i•.= ;4:. .;5--'ti t f—.,I1- 1' »rT-_I _`' "t",--i i ._..1 • t- -r-- : y-�a'+ '' \'1.' "I: • .'`( ,, .� i•d.: _ -, '. r Lt •i' l 4.'1- s, `4 - ,1 1 ! � , i . • , _ t�,.•,{.t- ' anv(I '� >!r, y'i'�: • :..--i .C;L , I I, l-, •1, - :/,1' - '� _s•1as: �`,ti ?-''• • 1 • • / ." _11.1E•,1, _i -- - . ,_.__. .Z'f .'--t'9 (,. rY "' 1' .. .L.-_ -_`.i v, ( _ C � f t..t _ � 'i/�) 1' !'tol I � � r.4 • \ j-t- - .! (-r% - :F.`?i :i I. --1.r{�'•��-1"i ,S•+'/'vri'<.-. rF � - ? i i i-• % r l i .�'.rr;�.` . 1 Ifili�\��?._; iJ1 vl. ,"..' •••/yji • F. ,� _ • 'f. �r".1__I �~ �� i _-L:.'-::�, .'(.�/�J•" � ?� .• J� ;' . --+ , (��� '' .r' __1' _ -:r 1 - ,f.`-r..l.�-., rT 1; .• • .>r-- '•� ��.- 1::.;;= .':._. i'i.- \ >\` • r • • r. _.,:..i� C, ' k • 7 1. .C' /.." / �F-... Y%.) r7; a L. • m ..r_— ;4-"i 1,,; i_..._ .`--_t "f.; i-1 - 1 ,F i' '`,�' tl I '� •i ! a'r� t� / j' r'i p7r, •rt. 1 1_`:•• µ -- ... `r• _ . .-� ;``` � I i ,--y_ i J, -��. •• : CA Y ., ., , y,j j: 1-{ r- i_ ..- •�j. fiy ,88/}i/(. L {';_1-;; S`.. �(. - 1 ! • i -7' ir7 rl_. �, 'j,T;f'- i :'I/ i ' : ---i------'`--- - L�•- - -'o: CO y'1.1 i';(,,(‘'k..'.iy..:-...;:..):;__:!.,1....::f.:::_.,.':/..';....7",c_::::::'..,,,,,,' \: II:.. ; .,:,...:....:,..:4;1 7., • ,--:1;._;...,(.;.,._,i,l,r.t1.-:.:'... .:T._T.I.." ........2.1:1.171::.;,;„±"...1....;...i.::".'..-.,.-.,..::...,:_.-..- -.' .,...i......•;...;,\k.::.:..s.*\.‘,\!.., ‘''....11 . ,,i.,..:....,.....',.' ;.,,,,',..;;;,';,/.,:,,...'..i 7.: ail,: 7.....' G. _ :I •- .y.._.:....Lam;-�,•�__', • t� � "�'J" `i -i '• ..r'--�-_,_ -- 'i' -i i • s, I l • -L • :__ L.. , I._a'",-,.,.�: . • ._a .-__. f:.:.r•`_ - 1 -'i,Ni vi :c: -'1 3,..1 •L-..�-.. ___1 _r--: >s'. : ..t.- —•T\:�'e�.1)1-_.t— �-_. ..'tom"_�_;--- _— -• - :a��'a J.. "_t ' '. `.1,,;.4 ! .: T;i'•- _ , -S 17 .� r Y. ",.: 1 , -••, .,:_•,.(,1. , , ,.i\,( ,•� r -.:.:5 '-E.._'.: .v.. i, 2 r!��:•�"T�irf'y-- - -~�'/"!i� :�i' %f j ....__ifi r • ,tl- \� '.. `•�,. rI,`j� 0+F`:'' - -' ,7�...� -y - t�_i\`....�.._ dirk.. l,•.'^/� ..�:_ 4. • I r " : 1 ` Ir � ,t }-• 1., ICd }yu I I _ - _./1..'I C +r� Si � 1 n. l/ �(�"�;-..1 { 'tom..:__T _�-_.,/r_,._.�., 1 • Y _ .... ,iirrTs-'; ( • �=} ��' ter`..'. • �x1'`i' =' -1T1 i' ' I' • _ .. F+i • � nl , JJ `•,,r•r '. .. r.;% `4 I i I ±" I. a. /.r �t!;; - A V ` . �• t�,.. , P.,y' t:.:!•:,( ' , • • • .„ ` .• � �' /i�-"LL _ . - � r _. �:�� -1 '' ',t '7 rdY, :. : , �I W d.. ,:, ,. .,.),.,:, ... ,.,,:,,...,,,:;•,. ‘.6..;,,..... •. , ,?.-.›.. •••L,i..,..,_.-,—.___:—. .. -.7-...-,..,....to : ,,,,•,. ...:...._.A i...1_."."1.0,.. .-r r • ,•1 • g 1 • r, - i, v ,Fa°.' - way ,.4411-- lir int:.,.. _ re 9jF�t••�, • 'c J• : r •'c..�; `T°;(,. " .K - _� .~ '� ..:_ J`J 1i . . _ . !...._--_-_Lt,r r ::, •,.- !,‘ r.41.---,_ .._ - ., ,,•".,' ,...i . - - ,,...,,..x„.1.1,.,44+--r.Y.,..,Ns .. ---..-,-5,-_,r-.-i-..;[-F,TIA--.•77.,.p,,,,,,,,,...., ... -; .4 •• ;I' .\..I II.,''''' -..,.•i...i - .,. .."- ..43,.. I ;. :',., C.,•-• I•• I.`•,/',II '''';I‘ ;"`' A i'.7'..'7U•I.I'l r:5'.•,:!'.n.-e.,ir-VIIII1 i.- .. ••'•,..,..;', TA.‘„t;,•'...I..1-.4Js, .',...,-,/- • , • f •N1•••1 ... , .• ..- ',. ,41.,.. r.,, :-.-„,.,Ek..112(.• ''.-7;:-.. -:.,•• • (IP If.: •..•••: -.---v-,---•- •••e,,---::_...-' " :: --- ,,-...-,, ,•• ....._.„.. ..,. ......,._,••••. • • . f . , ,, ,.1 I.;pt -, : fl., *.,---'" ,. •-,-:_,,-..--..,...-i'...1;, •,••,,-.:-.,:, e--.--,tc-vi fi 7: '77: ' ' '."•.A 1-it:-÷..1. ' ...1-1 -717\.,i, F 1-tt-S, ri ':(-. -.':--t-) .... - =' : , • •-,.....15../ . • , 1 . , ,.; - .. ..--,. :_...--, ,,,,q,-•--.,• •;"---.:.._-'".-7_ '2-::-----'. 1•:' ) pt.*' I' -11Trit-t-k i,-.;' • i 1 ' ' *C' • s, . ,;•c,'Ar i t 1• .j;..',i-. ',7_71-‘.'--;\,. . - -.,,'. .. . .•. .3....:..-., - -1,..,.:. "i.5r..)/-TJ'1 I. '.\:.....:-• 7.4...- &-‘11::•5'\,,,,, -"., ,. '7' 11-r\ • ' ..... __---J • ._-. ..,..,,,,r..,.,..,,,!,,,, .. , ..• _,•,..,t.,..-!-. ; 17... •- , .•• ;..c:',.:;:; •.;•,..". ' ;- -; '•-• :--- ?.i.,„ ,.,.. , . .., , ,....i.,2,-6,..: .,• • 5.;. \ . , .., - ..-T'. ; • it ''-'----;%-'• .. •, --. " . . :. ', ;i 1;... ii• ,,..,.': . :. ••,•;1 . ,-- . .-4_,.".- -•,- .;; ..,,,e.,, .•-:..;...-3,-,-,__ ,,••-, . . ,.... ......:„.!:..... ':‘;7: .i •_..f. ,::,..ir=,---- '.k..• -_...... . ...;..-/..N• -......, • : •-. • .i. : -'---:.-1.:,:..- _.`:'.-,/ . /- . •-';.-_, I I:-, . . , . .. . •. .- ..„• , ' ••- . ..... ' ' , 17.----- • - ,L.,:•,., - ',..:. : ! .- .. . . , ., . , . •• ',-,....1,k - ../-• ; . - -:::,.-''',1_:f.-\I-1;E--iLe - • ..+-7-;- 2-:'''...: •.....--.-- 'i r7' 1.!yh--4 (1-7-7- - r , 47. t, ---,.....h--k -..,, ,--.:,. I -...--'-.:". 1.: ..-7,.---f;T: ,-,:: ..N.:.:-.;.; ----- .., \\ - = .. , -.. ....,. . • :: .4,.,-....Iasi:.,... .",..,..-...,-.1..,. •I‘... ,1 - ! -1--- ,.. •-• -,-....,. ,. .14 ' ...,, ! . . • . .....,,,,. - . ......._ . • . _.., ; .--I.. ';.,.,,,' ... _,.....1 .• • .• • ., P.,,:,.....11.,,I...!,,g;.',11 il,•:•-• ., .....„L•4_,:.,:t. .'„Jr —5-1—rk. ... --.. ..• 1-4.,. ),.:,1,--,-..;;.-F-,...7F,-:i..•....__:-:•-•• 1 L-1.7...::.: _.,.._.: , ,, ...--- !. 1-• i L__ • 1 ' 'u L..' ,,i, _.. . , .,..f,,A4:-.,,,,.:'&111-i•••-. ,.. 4 ; .•. •,. [1. 11. •, .ri '',,,..____... i,: ••-•,--... •---,- .., ,c., l• • „ \,--• t: V-,a ••••''''.1:.I.2..2.ti.sr' '' -- 7 - 1)/::----j../, Y .... .• '-'..,1..:' s'. ;-• ''....\ :.. ..r....; ,, I. •) f. 41;p!..' • f ! .---""'•-. -',:-•'.•'.',-(! .• •• ' '-'• •-.4....'!..A-:'-•!.':.':,. :'. 1....1.7-...,,...•;11_:•.1/ . ', tt--;;":.••••' - • ;:.-17;'" (F'j'il --- • , -;t• '\...1/•4•-,---•:-.,-.7--1 ,, -, . , 5\"..,.... .....,:;.:.L'...-::n,slii.''., : •;•.;";71- •1 • )1 ,, ''..." •-- -':• -•,--ifAG I, ''''. .',.. . ./W!..• 2,.-,- .,---,-.----. 7 .--'-..• "\ \ .:,--r-- ;• :47:7'1'. -..‘,*.; - ''.'il•- ,•...!: ' . ' -.'''...1.,:(..?-P- :, I i.,_--:-.:-.:::: . , ''..,-• .‘-'. V -',. - -% ---,--, , '..,...„. ..:.....:-;%,.....-:' ...J.:',... ,,.66....,, "447.... \_ , -1.' 1•.-• ••••i'1 ' ••• li• • ..., ilk I•V' , .--' :): ,! ',-. :'-',--... -r ,•.-f. • t .,1 ...' :,,,i, .1•;:iiYIT: ''. 1,y ,'; 1 .1,I„....,:"..,:.-.••• ' '.•'• • i I A ! i• ,. . . ,•••:...,,.., ,‘,•.,.,. .,.. -.,..,,.:-,.:••:' .: :. • 1.-Sts•:>*' ,,_ . ,L.-.• . • ' i ' ''•' 'L s,'• •'-'"ie;:• ',. •"-i ••'• -- .V• ..„,- ,..),,„ ._ •,...,., 4i.,.._,.:•j.i..:e.•,,•!.._A -.9._:-.-- '\..,.,. •' ,..:-...... 1 - . ,•,...,,,,,tr.t-.. .,:•,i•.•-i. • \ ,4-.3--II"'"---•,--,: '--.., ,:- Iv's!, • ••••., - ••_,-- ,• ., ..,pt_,._---i•..-ii .; - , -,-_-,--, •-- ••-• . ...... . . . . .-,. . • . ,. ._ ...,......-- ..__, -' • • --_, 'as. -••. '-..‘ • :.::•''',-.;.,.' ‘‘: 'rem, i,-- -.. -,.. - • - , l'-'n. -:', • 7-')i• - •::: --'—s---1-•'-'s•. .I.. - I..-'-'..': .14'tI. .h '. 116111-''' ' ' ,, . ...% '..- ._.4.,,;v /.....'.,' • ...•:\itli.. :i••V-IX'' • - . .:,)e. .-.1, k '. --'2-,-,-;..:.,/,,-.*4. ...„-....•,..,...-..„...1,._ . ... , . . .,...s..;.. -..,,1. . . 1,-,--n--,---_, -......• . ...•• . ., • ,\ „, , . i•Ir_,,J-- ;-.,-.) ..•.1.,. --,------ -1, .•__. . . ., ... ,..,,.,. , .. s,.,.-5.,•-• . I 41"r.'--?.7-‘",:::.4,,,',.:•.,-/•,1.,-.4..1. '1,' :.,..,i 1.7•7:-:::::2----;'.;,,,--••-- .:...iii..fi,A--';'' 'i-,-.17•';','. 7,-1.2.-.. ][7.-,,,,i-r.'\II •t.S1;11.\,- ' : .. 4.-.. i. ::,.'!‘,......:.rr-ii -;-.-Tr,t7::,:17t7:.:1:".•?,'•:-rt-'i ',.--.:•1.. '. . ,---:,....-r--.....,...,...-.. i , .,.-- -•.-•----.. . •',..?;•,?,„74,4' t•: il '--•••L' ., '•-,9 .--;',..•....• '.r.-•.,q..?•-c-•:- ---\ics.i.-.fr,,:-.„::•••.....„,',...::,.....:‘....,;,, ,,.. .--.--: •E .:' ' •"' I.,-i.z.,I\..t,, -.. .-„•-_,..-..,•,,. . .,,„ ,, ,[-"*.-,.1 , , •, ;••.,: , - ; ,-,.. ., .. ,- • .:„. !,-,,-,-.1--,1 •:,,-•--•-••••i. / :. .'1------i--•-----•-• I--i F."' -"' •'- • '"1•A• • :'• .1'2:',7.L.-11.....,•,: ' .• .... . ........ ,. _,..,,,,.. , . . . •. L -.k...,,,-' ‘-., ‘4.-.,t?..,,'',Z.-7.....,•.:-4•••I . - "•iii.k....?"V co•. -•''.7---..:. ... ..2‘... '-,i ',- JI---1-.77"--; ":.;.:./.•I...! -.C..;., I,-,r ' I % :' .! • .' '. ' , ...;!.._ __,,2•,2._;..\',I-L-4::I'4.,k.1-,,---,,,-,4-:,-11•2:-.‘'',.':,i.. •,'Fl ', 1 ;' 1 f..----..f.••••". ,/ '''\.''-'4‘1 „----;,..1,;_• .t...4.,:il;,.; 1 '-':-. .-.7',.:. : ..• ; • ' ':V...7,-;Ir."7"..-- .....:L;.,_. ' • \'‘., ••••,-i.':',.: • ' ..'I' I'•I• - • • • ' '' kl.. '' - • • V,i •.•;2,-..I.----.LI.C-.. .,-.;;;;;.;, :,• .. r„ -‘ . : (..f."...:2. ... t....%'k.... ".1.,1' ,. .i.•-:::1 i.....•,',,,....:::., 111........, ii_,__.....j.... , ‘..•_.:?1. ,,„..)._.....;..., ,.,....„;.1,•:.,.,.,..-....,,,,-,-,-,•-• •--- '. • .. _ _ . ,.._ .. ..v..;.:, : ••••,..,\.._-..l'a;:ii:i. --_-_-_-_-..br771: :. ----. L.•i.• ,7 iii-- -.z! •and----.,-,t-r-.-.,-.,\-y.v-7%..Q,2.,:-.t1.--;,-:----12t.---;. • , • --.-- , •-•.Eak ,. -.).---,:• ••.:. 1- ,,,4.,.. • \,i'+:-4. _.' !'- --, 1‘. .....z64 P1111... !•,/ • 1.'\I • ‘7477<(-,j 71:4‘, :_-_.:',--'--",..... , , '..,-il.‘,•.. ... ......:', ' ' Hill.••• \--.. \•-• --•-• • \, .. ..J..••,• . ....•;..i ri -:--4--i,-• . .„': '-- 1 -----,41--,i•1. •,',1\•,-r:,-c-=1-iiii7.V.,1 ;• • , . . • - . .... ...K-4-,••:i.. •:,•'.•,..:l• •-,...-,'-;----..--.-•-!,_•. i: ,--;::1.-. . . , .' ,.k - L .. '''','" ' dirr . .....". : '''-.‘...'1.'t'.....7.'.::.=2... .- .1,- .:-.-..-' ''' • " \--,---A •'NNW :-":"'•'''II, •• '• • . ...• - •-•-•:—.• IC,'•i •-2.--;21,;-:-.' • - ••'- • • -,..':•.-7-:,..---• -IL-. 4'.'7••if.i.,' , .7..., - . 'I . •ri'i ; -,,... r'....! •.• 'II : 1'... '•ff.! I, ,..4-•,:zi,././.,i >,-----.; , _ ._ .' '.. ;, • ,... '•, •; .12.. .;,..,,-,.., -.,, i'1../ •1 •:\I. ••''':'''K- i 41....1 474..zA:....--; :•"-X----t-42',.:116.-,.. . 4:1110. . .), •i•-• • •• • . ... - •i •-. L.:. ••,- f• - •••• • . •--••• . .. i . . . t`. ••-••• t• •.-v.,341N....• . . ..1.4r..:.,,..:: s-sk• •• . • - .... -•-•-•----\-„- • , - ..i ..,..,. .1. -,g 1 .?-1,7,;.?'.N.,- . ,4', • • ., !'. ..,'•••,..,...-7. '141:,- ..,)., _.''' ., /,:l•,;,:' • . -- ,, • • . ...- ---' • ,1, ,. 1 11 . ,,•-•,- :-.-- .• ..... ..._ . .. • "--:- '',--F---..._.•-..----. '_1,- ''-' F"':1' 4.:_:.-14.---A:',--.:,-:',. - .- . ... .. , , ._. 1.:'•.;f:—..'illti:‘' .&-*I•sr,b)'..• . •••••--4;'••:*: .••.:: ••,,.. --- - ,; -.-."/. .'• . ..:-......,./.:--'......•''' lx,...::-.., -•.,. \•',,,' ..,.. , ,.. ., . . . . ,ft . ., v ,4 . ,. , -....---...- • ..• -_ • , ... , . • .- , . -; . •,'„:;"''''''.:::: 7: A 1 1::::"-:."1'!••••':,. ‘••LP.-••: -.....',-...-..',:.'"•,-‘,..'': '••.'''• • ." •••-•.:'.. : ' .... -..I'lj.,11-- ...:'-4.;:\l''..-1'*.i'SNY•-`;-. ---- ‘.--.7.-.''''--.1 - ----.-:- 1--;-'..." • -' ;-- .• • 1:, gi..... i_,,, ... ,..... .1-,/,1, .,?:,.,2.1.-,,..f...,.,,z_.,..--_,.,..„.• 1.,, • • —• :"--. • . ,••11- . ._ . "•••:.. ktr?.....• :•,t:;.-„,„,. ...,....\,...T..,.....•• •. •• . , • ..„.„... -• .....,.-4-•,4,,,--, : -...,_ ,:• t••-•,- . .„, ,.-..,..,--4..:,, v,„. •,,...,..„..,\ . 1 .. .., .,.1 -,•......:•• •,...• : .. •._-..- , „ • , •...,,,....,, • : • :... ,,.....,,,„-.2„:......,.f\:,..1.k.,10 ..:.` :-.':.,.•`.,. 7V",-,,..-,. . ....,....,,.,-, ..„.',,_.;:; 11.;_.=--. , / 'rav • 'ir.,,fra::-:,, ';:i.-"d".41.1,Vi7.s.s`4,zii, ,,...1:Ti!. ..--',.-.. •:`...... • ‘,,l,„: . •••• .1...- \•-•'!-• %.,..-- ..1. ••••.....•-ifteriiirapP,` -, ,... • -.•.. •!.--:-.,‘..._...!,,..- • .• qt.,ir.-41,40.,....1 ',' •,•''',..\._•-•. -• '-•,• ..,.-4-.:1•4-•';',..f.,h90"...... fil15°,4.7.- : 4.i 1 1...,. 1 ' !,,) .1 ,,:'i. /..•',,,,. --/ -4"-----''.) .. •-',..,,--.4.4,-7,4E•..:, --,..-... ,... .4-,5„.,47,?.....; ,.ip, •. . -' ,-,--cc-. v,,,,, r- ' ' ::11' ••- ‘-. 4K -.7 ft i•,..,,,.•- 444,-...,_, k ' ,:,...f.,l.it't -.;t..I....-..7/Yri,-,ii;J:::'AN;,-- --.:.." \ .V.-:.''' . ..:',:,:7-:.--•'.1!"116'"" 7; .: C...Z.,.. f-rri_-_-• ,..,,, ,...• ' ,...,.; . i -' '-,i',.•••?,--,tit-III;--4, . ...11Mlitylairile---...-- ---..14 ...,_,._ - ,....,.:iAr.7. . -... - .--ii.. IIIIIIII•• - ''•• • • • \\.Rt• --- —...1,•. :Vi„ , - .,,,/.-.--,,,, .. ,, •..-:: ;... ...: •••.;,..."4-01mA I r 1 t 00.:,-,...-IZ- )\..-.,opi .0%,....,....:. ,...,,,,,..., ...: , _...::2i . , ...... . i .._____1 ,,...... . ., 1. .. /..... 1..;,, .__1._:::,...."„...±.1....,...1.,;; ,......,.. ,__. . .•:.--.7,.....2. ib*44.t.Y.,,..,'"?!.1.414.47;•:c-g., s.- l7=11firefj#1,'$-,'..11•74_ f ar„, '..•-I-' sj.`` 2E.- . - - AliNi.''--- V'.) ','?:.• ... - / ' :.1-'w'llittliati;n;•.1111r - - -- . I - ' ill ----'I • . -, ‘,.- •- n v. 1 ' ( .2.6-.C. - •;. t--.---c-r'----!----4.-- -..-.•; .;• -.--•!- - . - ,. . . --.: i;/ '-'-i--•••• -•:.••--ti::.11.•i- • - -•-!aZieb. i--1;. __,, i \ 1,,,z;,-.:-.i c\,/. ,• 1 ., 1.,, ,,,• , ,,,.; .e, • ','..:-.- /...-:-.1:::.....:-.,,i17:.........,T;. : :I i•-• .: '`..-,..--.---- ... 1 ' ' ',<,/. _.<c- Vt•I ___i 1 .,'•--;--1-‘ ••••..2..1 r=--' . , ., • , .. ..,. ., _ . ...._t: irtiii. i l'.'', ,.. v,t.w.Ai 1 N.N-..--...L.-.. ' -!----4 y-17 i- -;-.,,•• :::: - ' . , , I . n-v .111111fEbM2 7.:•ip,...;„j-•.„..-.7-... . , •,.. • -1 71611E11M_ ..;_-, ..., ••• , . _..j — :I •• ',-, 1.-..... . 1 i. % '', ,--- - . •..:. '', Iiiiniiiiniit ,..' .. ' ..•• :. • .; • ?1\--1 1 'i 1 )-1 ' •-- .‘•:•-ri..''. EININIIPINIMmle..*,, i.,t-,Z 1, ,-- : !' / ::' - • ..-. ••• •-• '•" - " - - '` . - c-,,, 42.,mih 1 slide hazard maps for Seismic Hazard .,.. .. seismic hazard areas. .?. areas are susceptible . ...-_- •...,‘........quakes. Other seismic Areas N ptible to liquefaction. ;•:,--,,,,--: ••, •Iot shown on this map are iriain by iacustrine sediments; I • ..... ''''., ''• •• • i? . - .. -- ..• •:a-. • . -r-. —7--I.I `I'4 6 1 i 4 r• - -- ;-[I j..:_ _ yap"..-_ - - -- " if j_I \_. • Wig—� .' "? ell[ ^L;! - ' • c - if ":- -.,,:i `, i- !j% : .1' • _:i—.r •, - _.• ^za '! i -. r 'E", • __ _ --.i. xr -, - 1----7.,',---- LSD--I-�' 'I •5 4 • F r•i \\:.'i......••,;•-`ft.-.....-:,:,-ii).:-...— ,f-A•77I -..',•I •ki•4•-.,- - ii j • ',A 1,T "') 'r•�C I a �.. _rr lk\\ .‘,.:,,,..:..11.‘....:/rii:::1 L.\2, '''''''.:i '*.Ii...:-----... .....I1)..f•' .\\' .. •„.„,, .•, •z •, ,,, ,•.t.,,,, ,., , , _,..,, ,y, ' ,. . ,. ...„,„..., .4 .4.2.11,: ; . .; . . .__ • ' 4. F, 2., r : y' � . 11 ),.0,..;•.17,:„.7.17,,:;;T:—_-_-_,c:.„,., , •,,.., 1._._•-•:,.• .....i.,_, . % 4" i ': r 1 i+ ,� iO I t mo`• .'k . p- • • r l T • • �~ o '� - i -/�-� ;�+t..�� .".vii�� � e w~ t • _ f _ �,. s• . , ,.,l,,- - .. I :A- '-''!-'. 1 .:.e..-----. ,*-1.......;:.•..-....-• ..-:". '-.:-'. ...-1', -:- ...- ':-.'-. .-. •.:.:J '..: ..' Am p.. ilip.:.k .,„ • • ..1.4.1_, "1 y��q' �- k ',. S=�?. !' '_I• a.•SLR—WO . �•.p "_ ,,^`, �,•`•,.i:�..,,, - 4t1�' � �1�'N:% .A :r T':,t�..,, ..- yl', y,/oru',._ ,1 sr''' _f c�� �:... lam`• • r ,'Y:11Y'•. '�= -'A1 a�.2 (,�.. +_— =r:F bpi, ` \ �^ i\ \ ./ �' �.j� A 1 Alell�FS"-, . . - .� � •� ..AL-- , • t /17.,.. .,vizm,.., :, Ellifil li-,----,T .- - .IT mime ,I• 1r -ii INWSittigiai il,4 at • .....1' _,,,..: .. ,--111,TEIFIlilliMMOI 1 _,.....; ,.; ••, . .._L:::.j - . 1 : • ,. 1,_,\ ...;_u.,.:_,_;_ i...,..- le had additional min- r)(:', <;:Tiiai I. •nt map was flied with Coal Mine Hazard I rtment of Natural Re- aeveiopment that occurs Areas - -_- .', ese areas should be preceded study to confirm or deny the a . '' '] `' • additional subsurface tunnels. N h 6+�-_- -- ...�.. EXHIBIT G WETLAND INVENTORY MAP (Not Applicable) 6052.002[BH/sm] . EXHIBIT H DRAINAGE COMPLAINTS (Not Applicable) 6052.002[BH/sm] EXHIBIT I KING COUNTY SOIL SURVEY 6052.002[BH/sm] ., • .0 . , -;;de,- : .--:, .)---• --.,.. r ' 1 I ►,.r1 , /.I I U f AgD "01.;iiimpr. t ' r _ ' AR'O' � \- or, rcznialt. AlSi 1� � t J ifiver• f:%AA Ill. 'a . I i�l�� � ���o „i lb - .114/1 ki,A1 \,,,,="v, 'mow• 1%BM/ i •-• "-----11...1 a J I� I�III ,n 'field 1' r .�yi1• ��� x :.L- __��bsta'� 1 . I O q `,''�_', �� -i �:� y'FA'0.*".. ..r• ,Eva ; • ' �• ••I�Q4� •: 11 Ii '� Ur II I '`�r'I� I .. i. •.:....-• -. 1 11; 41?e9_4_110M MI' , .g .N,,,. .1,1,7:, yto,/ • �'� :aseb'dIF/ �� -�--- GRAVEL F BM 4 t_eD „...1--44111,•::-NN 114 WIN Orli lip Park/ .*, I BM p: Mini \II p ocir--- 1160...-. ....••••MPOIMINNE.- illaMir•- ILS`:7 I. igic.ggilia 1 tallii . BeD �yr-- \4''AkF. .. , . • P----------- .411......11r- irgi:. .*'11N"b1111110.-5.1 INiti:.i-- I :., , . ROADT p / i� +, . , ,.• ki AflAv / o���� RA 1• u �,pAoe L� �"7 ,,\\ ` y .y IIII'`Iiiil�l s A Ur' Py iiiier p 111 •.lad, )� TE :-wo -,� Ur ,,JJ/ ,,I' �__ ' •----- • r PY L.id • i :■� THE �i) I* Sew.•_ pR �•m r-- •�� ■ A, \ .r` I �" \\ C a N`,......A. OF Disp• - / — �� ® � 1 "' :�_ •- __; _ Substa l �'' ` 7kit0mid®� Ali a►®` •.,. .. .,1 AgD Zo ,,,, �,, C - �M 16 ••• iI q� .. __ Pu 914L 1 ry% �=C11 1 i iii ___, u rift7it -/, _J ... Ur • I i f:iiii•-.:.'y • 1` .Longacre,,...1;4 I J Pu •- ==1 •• 5•- ®` d L/ o:+ 1 `•ol. I R ,�;umm iii• • ;rBeC1 a •I Wo :eD .n � o"� c-IIII 1M1 Ur I ti" ` •• p11 'II. •• :ii: •r (AgO trr `'•`• • 1� ' pit,--A,` i Track ;,�a. \ _�— I - -� -•n$�•1 B \ .--_ --- i\ 1 _e—,, r 'mik --- `� i 210 ' -' I• 1.76 i:. 'I . Ur CFe 13:1 .k 's . c W �, r- ka 3 F. : -ss • ��l • ..I - 2 • • So Tu m •a "RI �• Z I Jl ,, ,i;\41:1 �II W " Sk •. ' Wo I • lkil 25 Witi \Ur-�Ih li CI' n PY Sk I • .•1. • ` r-,, �� •-_= I • I I • �'-��. AgD •• a1_1391 •L II NINA BM it • :/e 11114. So , 1 $I ' \ I. Wo , Mt.'•1 .-illir- la Airoli:. Jc1 • 11- I•• ` ItrIN - I fi b "'aa I •. , ' •� AmB• , ' 3• "g' B_ C• ; 1 - \�?� :Do I AgB. s '9a, •. GUIDE TO MAPPING UNITS For a full description of a mapping unit, read both the description of the mapping unit and that of the soil series to which the mapping unit belongs. See table 6, page 70, for descriptions of woodland groups. Other information is given in tables as follows: Acreage and extent, table 1, page 9. Town and country planning, table 4 Engineering uses of the soils, tables 2 and 3, page 57. pages 36 through 55. Recreational uses, table 5, page 64. Estimated yields, table 7, page 79. Woodland Map Described Capability unit group on symbol Mapping unit page Symbol Page Symbol AgB Aide/wood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes 10 IVe-2 AgC Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 8 IVe-2 76 3d2 78 3d1 AgD Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 10 AkF : Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep VIe-2 78 3d1 AmB Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes 1/ 10 10 VIIe-1 78 2d1 AmC Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes 1 IVe-2 76 3d2 An Arents, Everett material 1/ 10 IVe-2 76 3d2 BeC Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 11 IVs-1 77 3f3 BeD Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 121 IVe-2 76 3d2 BeF ' Beausite gravelly sandy loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes 12 12 VII VIe-2e 78 3d1 Bh Bellingham silt loam -1 78 3d1 Br Briscot silt loam 12 IIIw-2 76 3w2 Bu Buckley silt loam 13 IIw-2 75 3w1 Cb . Coastal beaches 13 IIIw-2 76 4w1 Ea Earlmont silt loam 14 VIIIw-1 78 _ Ed , Edgewick fine sandy loam 14 IIw-2 75 3w2 EvB Everett gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes 15 IIIw-1 75 2o1 EvC Everett gravelly sandy loam, 5 to 15 percent slopes 16 IVs-1 77 3f3 EvD Everett gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes VIe-1 78 3f3 EwC ,`Everett-Alderwood gravelly sandy loamy, 6 to 15 percent 16 Vle-1 77 3f2 slopes InA Indianola loamy fine sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes 16 VIs-1 78 3f3 InC 'Indianola loamy fine sand, 4 to 15 percent slopes 16 7 IVs-2 77 4s3 nD Indianola loamy fine sand, 15 to 30 percent slopes 17 IVs-2 77 4s3 2Kitsap silt loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes VIe-1 76 4s2 KpC Kitsap silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes 17 IIIe-1 75 2d2 KpD Kitsap silt loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes 18 IVe-122d1 76 ?d2 KsC ;Klaus gravelly loamy sand, 6 to 15 percent slopes18 VIe-2 78 Ma Mixed alluvial land 18 VIs-1 78 3f1 NeC Neilton very gravellyloamy18 VIw-2 78 2o1 sand, 2 to 15percent slopes VIs-1 Ng Newberg silt loam p 19 78 3f3 Nk Nooksack silt loam 19 IN-1 74 2o1 No Norma sandy loam 20 IN-1 74 2o1 Or Orcas peat 20 IIIw-3 76 3w2 Os Oridia silt loam 21 VIIIw-1 78 __ OvC Ovall gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes 21 IIw-2 75 3w1 OvD Ovall gravelly loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes 23 IVe-2 76 3d1 OvF Ovall gravelly loam, 40 to 75 percent slopes 23 VIe-2l - _ 78 3d1 Pc Pilchuck loamy fine sand 23 VIe1 78 3d1 Pk Pilchuck fine sandy loam 23 VIw-1 78 2s1 Pu Puget silty clay loam 23 IVw-1 76 2s1 Py Puyallup fine sandy loam 24 IIIw-2 76 3w2 RaC Ragnar fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes 24 IN-1 74 201 RaD Ragnar fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes IVe-3 77 4s1 26 RdC Ragnar-Indianola association, sloping: 1/ VIe-2 -78 - 4s1 26 Ragnar soil — ___ Indianola soil -- IVe-3 77 4s1 RdE Ragnar-Indianola association, moderately steep: 1/- IVs-2 77 4s3 26 -- ___ Ragnar soil — Indianola soil VIe-2 78 4s1 VIe-1 77 4s2 U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1973 0-468-266 GUIDE TO MAPPING UNITS--Continued Woodland Described Capability unit group Map on symbol Mapping unit page Symbol Page Symbol _ Re Renton silt loam 26 IIIw-1 75 3w1 Rh Riverwash 27 VIIIw-1 78 --- Sa Salal silt loam 27 IIw-1 74 201 Sh Sammamish silt loam 27 IIw-2 75 3w1 Sk Seattle muck 28 IIw-3 75 --- Sm Shalcar muck 29 IIw-3 75 --- Sn Si silt loam 29 IN-1 74 201 So Snohomish silt loam 30 IIw-2 75 3w2 Sr Snohomish silt loam, thick surface variant 31 IIw-2 75 3w2 Su Sultan silt loam 31 IIw-1 74 3w1 Tu Tukwila muck 32 IIw-3 75 --- Ur Urban land 33 -- --- Wo Woodinville silt loam 33 IIw-2 75 3w2 1/ The composition of these units is more variable than that of the others in the Area, but it has been controlled well enough to interpret for the expected use of the soils. ri ROLL NO. START �� � OF ROLL BEGINNING OF FILE FILE TITLE EtF#91--,/,2